The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-16-2022 Septic Compliance Inspection ReportMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Comp p Compliance inspection report form 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation – additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: hftps://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wg-wwists4-31a pdf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 15 days of f nal determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local trackinc number Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: Local regulatory authority: City of Orono —.— - -- _. Property address: 2460 Thouroughbred Lane Orono --- Owner/representative: Joe Coianni _ _ Owner's phone: 952-22.1-5711 Brief system description: 2 - 1300 gallon septic & 1300�c anon pump tank with_a mound system System status system status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 2/16/2922 _ ® Compliant–Certificate ofcompliancet' (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. ❑ Noncompliant – Notice of noncompliance An imminent threat to public health and safety (17'PHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) –Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) – Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) – Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) – Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) – Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) – Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permittmonitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) – Noncompliant -local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name bAofsing e above statements to be, true an rrect, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the puing form.Business name: Se _ _ Certification number: C1659Inspector signature:_License number: 2502 _asbee lec onically sig ) Phone: 952-873-3292�Necessary or loed supporting documentation (must be attached) —� ® Soil observation logs ® Locally required forms ® Tank Integrity Assessment El Operating Permit ❑ Other information (list): https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-316 • 1/11/21 Poge l of 4 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System discharges sewage to the ❑ Yes' ®No ❑ Other: ground surface - - --, _---.._ __ __ ® Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes* ® No '.. tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into []Yes* ® No dwelling or establishment________ Any "yes" answer above indicates tjre system is an '.. _ imminent threat to Public health and safety - Describe verification methods and results: Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge Checked for back-up 2. Tank integrity— Compliance component #2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supporting documentation: System consists of a seepage pit, ELI Yes' ® No ® Pumped at time of inspection cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, - Sewage tank(s) leak below their []Yes* ® No designed operating depth? If yes which sewage tank(s) leaks: _ Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Pumped & Inspected Name of maintenance business: Sewer Services License number of maintenance business: 2502 Date of maintenance: _2_/_16_/_20.22 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mm/ddiyyyy): (must bi within three years) (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 8 (1)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary — explain below) ❑ Other: https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 P"ge 2 cf4 3. Other compliance conditions — Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes* ®No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? ❑ Yes' ® No 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? ❑ Yes' ® No *Yes to 3c or 3d- System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and, results: Inspected Attached supporting documentation: ® Not applicable ❑ 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "I'00", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? [:]Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit (Attach) ❑ https://www.pca.state,mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service • Available in alterr�ati eformats wq-wwists4-3lb • 1/11/21 S. Soil separation — Compliance, component #5 of 5 Date of installation 10/15/1997 ❑ Unknown imm/dd/yyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food ❑ Yes ® No Attached supporting documentation: beverage lodging? ® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) Compliance criteria (select one): - ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, ❑ Yes ❑ No' separation (Attach) and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ Drainfield has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 5b. Non-performance systems built April 1,. ® Yes ❑ No* 1996, or later or for non-performance _ Indicate depths elevations - -- -----ions ----- - systems located in Shore/and or Wellhead _A. Bottom of distribution media 1811+ Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: B. Periodical) saturated soil/bedrock 18" desi - - - - y sn - _.. g. Drainfield has a three-foot vertical C. System separation separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* D. Required compliance separation* 38" - — -- --- *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. * 50. "Experimental, "Other, or "Performance" ❑ Yes ❑ No* systems built under pre -2008 Rules; Type /V or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. *Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Boring 1-8" 10yr 3/4 loam 9-22" 10yr 4/4 clay loam Redox 20" Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shore/and areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. https://www.pca.state.mn.us 1111/21 mn.us . 651-296-6300 wq-wwists9-316 1/1 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alter native formats wq-w Page 4 of 4 \A0,-,r� o a� X - Cbl" 14 i 00 Location 'orOProjectG JLot 18 Block '2, DickeyU„ 1 e � Site, Orono ---T Borings made by S -P Testing, Inc. SteveSchirmers Date 4-1:L-94 Classifiction System: AASHO—; USDA -SCS X Unified ; Other Auger used (check two): (land X-- —, or PowerFlight_, or Bucket X � Depth, Boring number 1 Depth, Boring number — 2 I n feet Surface elevation 1022.4 0 - FM 3 - 4 - 5 - 7 - Topsoil dark brown loam 0 - 1' Brown loam 1' - 1 -1/2' -MOTTLED 1 - Rusty olive brown clay 1-1/2' - 214” loam Rusty olive gray clay loam 14" - 3010" Rusty olive gray loam 3'10" - 5' End of boring at 5' feet. Standing water table: present at 3' feet of depth, 20 hours after boring. Not present in hole Mottled soil: Observed at 1-1/2feet of depth. Not present in hole Comments: in — feet Surface elevation 1023.1 0 - Topsoil dark brown n _ i, loam 1 - Brown loam 2 1' - 1-1/2' Brown clay loam 2 - 1-1/2' - 2'2"-MOTTL Rusty olive brown clay loam 3 - 2'2" - 312" Rusty olive gray clay loam w/traces of sand 4 - 3'2" - 412" Rusty olive gray loam Al-" - C, 5 - r' 7 - M End of boring at 5' feet Standing water table: present at 3'9" feet of depth, 20 hours after boring. Not present in hole Mottled soil: Observed at 2'2" feet of 'e9th. Not present in hole Comments: " L- L 3 CERTIFICATIOk' ;I 00627 ILS of Soil 11orinys Location or. Project Lot 18, Block 2, Dickey Site, Orono Borings made by S -P T_estinq, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 4-1.1-94 Classifiction System: AASHO_; USDA -SCS X Unified Other Auger used (check two): Hand X or Power_, Flight_, or Bucket x Depth, Boring number 3 Depth, Boring number 4 in feet Surface elevation 1023.5 in feet -- Surface elevation 1023.6 0 - -- 0 Topsoil dark brown loam Topsoil dark brown sandy 0 - 10" 0 - 8" loam Brown loam Brown sandy loam 8" - 1 -1/2' -NI TTLED 1 1 - 1 _ Rusty olive brown 1-1/2' - 2'4" sandy 1 2 - 10" = 2' -MOTTLED 2' 2 - Rusty olive brown loam 2' - 2-1/2' Rusty olive gray clay loam 2-1/2' - 314" Rusty olive gray clay loam 214" - 314" 3 _ 3 _ 4 - Rusty olive gray loam 4 - Rusty olive gray loam 5 - 314„ - 5' 31411 - 51 5 - 6 - 6 _ 7 - End of boring at 5 feet. Standing water table: present at 3'5" feet of depth, 20 hours after boring. Not present i, hole_ Mottled soil: Observed at 2' feet of depth. Not present in hole Comments: Z M End of boring at 5 feet. Standing water table: present at 3' feet of epth, 20 hours after bora. g. Not present in hole Mottled soil: Observed at 1-1/2' feet of depth. Not present in hole Comments: ,