HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-18-2022- 525 Leaf St - Compliance Insp Report1 MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance in
CONTROL AGENCY p
520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) r(
documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be
httos�//www oca state mn us/sites/default/files/wa-vvwists4-31a odf.
Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and syste
determination of compliance or noncompliance.
r information Local trackin
Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range:
Local regulatory authority:
Property address: 525 Leaf Street, Orono
Owner/representative: True Victory Christian Fellowship
Brief system description_1500/2 (house) 2 x 1000 (church) & 2000 cal shared
System status
System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 1/18/2022
® Compliant —Certificate of compliance'
(Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of
an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring
removal and abatement under section 145A.04,
subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists
in Local Ordinance.)
*Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn.
R. 7080,1500 as of system status date above and
does not guarantee future performance.
!ction report form
reatment System (SSTS)
Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement
and attached supporting
here:
within 15 days of final
Owner's phone: 406-585-7797
❑ Noncompliant — Notic*of noncompliance
An imminent threat to IPuI health and safety (ITPHS) must be
upgraded, replaced, o it3 use discontinued within ten months of
receipt of this notice o ithin a shorter period if required by
local ordinance or unc er section 145A.04 subdivision 8.
Systems failing to prol ect ground water must be upgraded,
replaced, or use disco pti ued within the time required by local
ordinance.
Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable)
❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health
❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater
❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public
❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundv
❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3)
❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater
❑ Operating permittmonitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncom
Comments or recommendations
Certification
I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compile
determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conc
abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage.
By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be tr a and correct, to the best
can be used for the purpose fflocessi is f r
Business name: Sewer ices Certification r
Inspector License r
his doa7ment has been electronically signed)
Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must t
® Soil observation logs
❑ Other information (list):
https://www.pca.state. mn. us
wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21
® Locally required forms ® Tank Integrity
• 651-296-6300
• 800-657-3864 Use your
safety
It and safety
ling to protect groundwater
t -local ordinance applies
status of this system. No
s during system construction, possible
knowledge, and that this information
C1659
952-873-3292
❑ Operating Permit
• Available in alternative formats
Page 1 of 4
1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5
Compliance criteria:
Attached supp
System discharges sewage to the ❑ Yes' ® No
❑ Other:
ground surface
_
®Not applicable
System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes' ®No
tile or surface waters.
System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes' ® No
dwelling or establishment.
Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an
imminent threat to public health and safety.
Describe verification methods and results:
Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge
Checked for back-up
2. Tank Intel
— Compliance component #2 of 5
System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes' ®No __
cesspool, drywall, leaching pit,
or other pit?
Sewage tank(s) leak below their ❑ Yes' ® No
designed operating depth?
If yes which sewage tank(s) leaks: I
Any "yes" answer above indicates the system
is failing to protect groundwater.
Describe verification methods and results:
Pumped & Inspected
https://www,pca.state,mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864
wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21
documentation:
Attached supporting documentation:
® Pumped at time of nspection
Name of maintenar ce business: Sewer Services
License number of maintenance business: 2502
Date of maintenance: 1/17/2022
❑ Existing tank integrty assessment (Attach)
Date of maintenance
(mmiddiyyyy): (must be within three years)
(See form instructic ns to ensure assessment complies with
Minn. R. 7082.070( subp. 4 8 (1))
❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary - explain below)
❑ Other.
I
Use your referred relayservice Available in alternative formats
Page 2 of 4
3. Other compliance conditions—Compliance component #3 of 5
3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured?
❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Unknown
3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes` ® No ❑ Unknown
*Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety.
3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector?
3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500?
*Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater.
Describe verification methods and results:
Inspected
Attached supporting documentation: ® Not applicable ❑
❑ Yes* ® No
❑ Yes* ®No
4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 ® Not applicable
Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", A below is required
Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required
BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design
If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed.
Compliance criteria:
a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance.
Describe verification methods and results:
Attached supporting documentation: ❑
https://www.pca.state. mn.us 651-2966300
wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21
800 -1,W -j6154
Use your referred relay service
Available In alternative formats
Page 3 of
5. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5
Date of installation 7/4/2003 ❑ Unknown
(mm/dd/yyyy)
ShorelandMellhead protection/Food
beverage lodging?
5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996,
and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead
Protection Area or not serving a food,
beverage or lodging establishment:
Drainfeld has at least a two -foot vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock.
51b. Non-performance systems built April 1,
1996, or later or for non-performance
systems located in Shore/and or Wellhead
Protection Areas or serving a food,
beverage, or lodging establishment'
Drainfeld has a three-foot vertical
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock.*
5c. "Experimental", "Other", or "Performer]
systems built under pre -2008 Rules,
Type IV or V systems built under 2008
Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400
(Advanced Inspector License required)
Drainfield meets the designed vertical
separation distance from periodically
® Yes ❑ No Attached supporting documentation:
® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach)
❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical
Yes F1 No* separation (Attach)
❑
❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area)
® Yes ❑ No* Indicate depths or elevations
A. Bottom of distribution media 14"
B. Periodically saturated soiUbedrock __22" design
C. System separation 36"
D. Required compliance separation* 36"
❑ Yes ❑ No*
*Any "no" answer above indicates the system is
failing to protect groundwater.
Describe verification methods and results:
Boring
1-11" 10yr 3/2 loam
12-25' 10yr 4/4 clay loam
Redox @ 24"
*May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local
Ordinance.
Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced,
or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by/ocal ordinance. If the
system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by
local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the
system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict.
This provision does not apply to systems in shore/and areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food,
beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law.
h"ps://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300
wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21
800-657-3864 Use your breferred relay service Available in alternative formats
Page 4 of 4
S)s s
Lea -�
�iovst
A 6 C D
MH a�
M H
tom..
M► -14 4a'6" 53'
MHS Mo tit'
MN6 '1 S`i,
if -3o -()Lt
st
( `W
Sr `�\tj� C
r'�hr `�P26 I
de,. - 13 0
60fc%
z --->
S -P TESTING, INC. Steven B. Schirmers - MPCA Cert.No. 627
951 Katydid Lane NE - St. Michael, MN 55376 - (763) 497-3566
FAX - (763) 497-5011
State License #394
New Thought Church of Religious Science
525 Leaf Street
Orono, Henn. Co., MN
Borings completed on 12-16-02, with a hand bucket auger.
BORING NUMBER 1- Elev.100.3 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 26" - no standing water present
in boring.
0 -
2"
Fill soil - loam with rocks
2" -
18"
Original soil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2
18" -
26"
Brown clay loam 10YR 5/4
26" -
40"
Rust brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 6/8
40" -
48"
Rusty brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 7/1,10YR 6/8
BORING NUMBER 2- Elev.100.7 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 20" - no standing water present
in the boring.
0 -
6"
Topsoil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2
6" -
12"
Gray brown loam 10YR 5/2
12" -
20"
Brown clay loam 10YR 5/6
20" -
38"
Rust brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 7/1,6/8
38" -
48"
Rust olive brown loam 10YR 6/3 - mottles 10YR 7/1,6/8
BORING NUMBER 3- Elev.99.9 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 38" - no standing water present
in the boring.
0 -
8"
Topsoil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2
8" -
14"
Gray brown loam 10YR 5/2
14" -
22"
Brown loam 10YR 5/4
22" -
38"
Yellowish brown loam 10YR 6/6
38" -
44"
Rust brown loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 6/8
44" -
48"
Rust olive brown loam 10YR 6/3 - mottles 10YR 7/1, 10YR 6/8
SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVA
Py
\ 1•
t . CITY of ORONO
` ra,;;�t•,.,^^.>;� `} ,�F� Municipal Offices
Street Address: Mailing Address:
E$Ii 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 553230066
Owner New Thought Church Phone (Home)_(952)955-1961
Address 525 Leaf Street City Orono State MN Zip
Site Evaluator_Steve Schirmers State License k627 Phone# 7�
Type of Establishment: Single Family_ Multi Family_
Commercial Est. Gallons Per Day _
No. Potential Bedrooms Slope: 3%
Depth of Sand: Upslope: 1.2 Downslope: 1.5 Soil Sizing
Perc Rates P-1 5.7 P-2 4.4 P-3 4.7 P-4 ____ P-5
Restricting Layer Depth B-1 26"" B-2 20" 13-3__L8" B-4
Type of Treatment System:
Standard X Altemative_ Other _ Performance _
Pressurized Mound System X At -Grade Systei
Gravity Trenches System Pressurized Tre:
Gravity Trenches W/ Lift Pressurized Bed Systen
Holding Tank W/ Alarm i
Septic Tank Size 1000 & 1500combo # of Tanks 3 1
Pump Brand GPM 44 Head 32
Treatment System:
Minimum Square Feet with 9 inches of rock
Bed_(10*41) Mound Treatment Area (41*R'
(Work) _
— P-6 P-7
B-5_ B-6
System
Tank Size 2000
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a design approval fot . which gust accompany the site plan.
A permit must be issued to a licensed septic contractor prio to instal ation.
NOTICE TO INSTALLERS: Any changes to the approved plansin t have prior approval of the
inspector (952-249-4600) Call for inspection 24 hours in advance.
ALL DRAINFIELD AREAS MUST BE FENCED OFF prior to wilding site excavation and
fencing must remain in place until final site grading. Approval to pou 7 footings will not be grantdd
until the Inspections Department has verified the primary and alternae sites are protected.
NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF ANY HIND is allowed within 20' f tested a protected.
sites ever.
ACCEPTED X DENIED_ By the City of Orono subject tq existing regulations and the
following c--0,**;-^
df U,%lir
.,wvia K Uti t °^t) OPV fr<<.1 Att�5
y C
q\\u•w:,.5-12�n1(y Yy yc
By: �azC l �bua�m, '7_ L4_o,3
Matt Bolterman, On -Site Systems Manager Date
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.cl.orono.mn.us
MOUND DESIGN WORK SHEET (For Flows up
to 1200
gpd)
Lwdina Rata
Gallo!
Per dsypar
Absorption
RaUo
A. Average Design FLOW
ramsand
htadlum Sand
InunY Sand
1.20
079
1.00
1 So
1o
,A -l: Estimated Sewage Flows In Gallons per Day
Estimated 14 S 0 gpd (see figure A-1)
number o
bedrooms Clan I Clan 11 Class III
Class IV
or measured x 1.5 (safety factor) = gpd
2
300 225
180
60%
Silty say
SaM ary
3
450 300
218
of the
B. SEPTIC TANK Ca
Capacity
p t y
4
600 375
256
values
5
750 450
294
In the
6
900 525
332
Class 1,
a - /000 gallons (see figure C-1)
7
1050 600
370
11, or iii
I - ISoo -auati y}g,�y(,�y_ y+,us�
8
1200 675
1 408 1
columns.
C. SOILS (refer to site evaluation)
011 Se ilc @ak Ca adties flil
alions
r i t
1. Depth to restricting layer = /��, feet
Numbuof Minimum liquid
Bedrooms opacity
Liquidcapacity with
subaso disposal
th
wrthdicapacty
2. Depth of percolation tests = /• o feet
iaslae
3. Texture Lt,{ tail. n
2orless 750
7or4 1000
nu
1500
1500
Percolation rate 5.2 mpi
7, or 9 2W 300
3°p°°
30M
4S
4. Soil loading rate .gpd/sgft (see figure D-33)
5. Percent land slope Mi
D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS
011
3.
Multi ply average design flow (A) by 0.83 to obtain required crock layer area.
L4
0 gpd x 0.83 sgft/gpd =, U 3 sgft-wo*o gOcP
Determine rock layer width = 0.83 sqft/gpd x linear Loading Rate
0.83 sqft/gpd x tZ _gpd/sqft = )0 ft
Length of rock layer = area + width =
1,0 sgft (D1) + Jo,_ ft (D2) = u 1 ft
E. ROCK VOLUME
1.
2.
3.
(LLR
Mound LLR
< 120 MPI <12
> 1,20 MPI < 6
Multiply rock area (Dl) by rock depth of 1 ft to get cubic feet of rock
4) 0 sgft x 1 ft = 910 cuft
Divide cuft by 27 cult/cuyd to get cubic yards
4) 0 cult + 27 cuyd/cult = ) S' cuyd
Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons
—ice cuyd x 1.4 ton/cuyd = - ;Q_ tons
SEWAGE ABSORPTION WIDTH
ption width equals absorption ratio (See Figure D-33)
rock layer width (D2)
a c� x Jct ft = a� ft
D-33: Absorption Width Sizing Table
Per lattan Rate
In MI�per
1
soil Texnus
Lwdina Rata
Gallo!
Per dsypar
Absorption
RaUo
Faster than
ramsand
htadlum Sand
InunY Sand
1.20
079
1.00
1 So
1o
.00
.<
46w60
swlra.y
Slit Clay Lam
0,45
2.67
1 to 120
Silty say
SaM ary
0.24
5.00
ower Wet 1204
•a umdd tartaw nth rnM haanm Put.=