Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-18-2022- 525 Leaf St - Compliance Insp Report1 MINNESOTA POLLUTION Compliance in CONTROL AGENCY p 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) r( documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be httos�//www oca state mn us/sites/default/files/wa-vvwists4-31a odf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and syste determination of compliance or noncompliance. r information Local trackin Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: Local regulatory authority: Property address: 525 Leaf Street, Orono Owner/representative: True Victory Christian Fellowship Brief system description_1500/2 (house) 2 x 1000 (church) & 2000 cal shared System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 1/18/2022 ® Compliant —Certificate of compliance' (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080,1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. !ction report form reatment System (SSTS) Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement and attached supporting here: within 15 days of final Owner's phone: 406-585-7797 ❑ Noncompliant — Notic*of noncompliance An imminent threat to IPuI health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, o it3 use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice o ithin a shorter period if required by local ordinance or unc er section 145A.04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to prol ect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use disco pti ued within the time required by local ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundv ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) ❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permittmonitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncom Comments or recommendations Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compile determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conc abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be tr a and correct, to the best can be used for the purpose fflocessi is f r Business name: Sewer ices Certification r Inspector License r his doa7ment has been electronically signed) Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must t ® Soil observation logs ❑ Other information (list): https://www.pca.state. mn. us wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21 ® Locally required forms ® Tank Integrity • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 Use your safety It and safety ling to protect groundwater t -local ordinance applies status of this system. No s during system construction, possible knowledge, and that this information C1659 952-873-3292 ❑ Operating Permit • Available in alternative formats Page 1 of 4 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Attached supp System discharges sewage to the ❑ Yes' ® No ❑ Other: ground surface _ ®Not applicable System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes' ®No tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes' ® No dwelling or establishment. Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge Checked for back-up 2. Tank Intel — Compliance component #2 of 5 System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes' ®No __ cesspool, drywall, leaching pit, or other pit? Sewage tank(s) leak below their ❑ Yes' ® No designed operating depth? If yes which sewage tank(s) leaks: I Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Pumped & Inspected https://www,pca.state,mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 documentation: Attached supporting documentation: ® Pumped at time of nspection Name of maintenar ce business: Sewer Services License number of maintenance business: 2502 Date of maintenance: 1/17/2022 ❑ Existing tank integrty assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mmiddiyyyy): (must be within three years) (See form instructic ns to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.070( subp. 4 8 (1)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary - explain below) ❑ Other. I Use your referred relayservice Available in alternative formats Page 2 of 4 3. Other compliance conditions—Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes` ® No ❑ Unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? *Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Inspected Attached supporting documentation: ® Not applicable ❑ ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Yes* ®No 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ https://www.pca.state. mn.us 651-2966300 wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 800 -1,W -j6154 Use your referred relay service Available In alternative formats Page 3 of 5. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 Date of installation 7/4/2003 ❑ Unknown (mm/dd/yyyy) ShorelandMellhead protection/Food beverage lodging? 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfeld has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 51b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shore/and or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment' Drainfeld has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* 5c. "Experimental", "Other", or "Performer] systems built under pre -2008 Rules, Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically ® Yes ❑ No Attached supporting documentation: ® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical Yes F1 No* separation (Attach) ❑ ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) ® Yes ❑ No* Indicate depths or elevations A. Bottom of distribution media 14" B. Periodically saturated soiUbedrock __22" design C. System separation 36" D. Required compliance separation* 36" ❑ Yes ❑ No* *Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Boring 1-11" 10yr 3/2 loam 12-25' 10yr 4/4 clay loam Redox @ 24" *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by/ocal ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shore/and areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. h"ps://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21 800-657-3864 Use your breferred relay service Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 4 S)s s Lea -� �iovst A 6 C D MH a� M H tom.. M► -14 4a'6" 53' MHS Mo tit' MN6 '1 S`i, if -3o -()Lt st ( `W Sr `�\tj� C r'�hr `�P26 I de,. - 13 0 60fc% z ---> S -P TESTING, INC. Steven B. Schirmers - MPCA Cert.No. 627 951 Katydid Lane NE - St. Michael, MN 55376 - (763) 497-3566 FAX - (763) 497-5011 State License #394 New Thought Church of Religious Science 525 Leaf Street Orono, Henn. Co., MN Borings completed on 12-16-02, with a hand bucket auger. BORING NUMBER 1- Elev.100.3 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 26" - no standing water present in boring. 0 - 2" Fill soil - loam with rocks 2" - 18" Original soil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2 18" - 26" Brown clay loam 10YR 5/4 26" - 40" Rust brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 6/8 40" - 48" Rusty brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 7/1,10YR 6/8 BORING NUMBER 2- Elev.100.7 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 20" - no standing water present in the boring. 0 - 6" Topsoil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2 6" - 12" Gray brown loam 10YR 5/2 12" - 20" Brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 20" - 38" Rust brown clay loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 7/1,6/8 38" - 48" Rust olive brown loam 10YR 6/3 - mottles 10YR 7/1,6/8 BORING NUMBER 3- Elev.99.9 - MOTTLED SOIL AT 38" - no standing water present in the boring. 0 - 8" Topsoil dark brown loam 10YR 3/2 8" - 14" Gray brown loam 10YR 5/2 14" - 22" Brown loam 10YR 5/4 22" - 38" Yellowish brown loam 10YR 6/6 38" - 44" Rust brown loam 10YR 5/6 - mottles 10YR 6/8 44" - 48" Rust olive brown loam 10YR 6/3 - mottles 10YR 7/1, 10YR 6/8 SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVA Py \ 1• t . CITY of ORONO ` ra,;;�t•,.,^^.>;� `} ,�F� Municipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: E$Ii 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 553230066 Owner New Thought Church Phone (Home)_(952)955-1961 Address 525 Leaf Street City Orono State MN Zip Site Evaluator_Steve Schirmers State License k627 Phone# 7� Type of Establishment: Single Family_ Multi Family_ Commercial Est. Gallons Per Day _ No. Potential Bedrooms Slope: 3% Depth of Sand: Upslope: 1.2 Downslope: 1.5 Soil Sizing Perc Rates P-1 5.7 P-2 4.4 P-3 4.7 P-4 ____ P-5 Restricting Layer Depth B-1 26"" B-2 20" 13-3__L8" B-4 Type of Treatment System: Standard X Altemative_ Other _ Performance _ Pressurized Mound System X At -Grade Systei Gravity Trenches System Pressurized Tre: Gravity Trenches W/ Lift Pressurized Bed Systen Holding Tank W/ Alarm i Septic Tank Size 1000 & 1500combo # of Tanks 3 1 Pump Brand GPM 44 Head 32 Treatment System: Minimum Square Feet with 9 inches of rock Bed_(10*41) Mound Treatment Area (41*R' (Work) _ — P-6 P-7 B-5_ B-6 System Tank Size 2000 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a design approval fot . which gust accompany the site plan. A permit must be issued to a licensed septic contractor prio to instal ation. NOTICE TO INSTALLERS: Any changes to the approved plansin t have prior approval of the inspector (952-249-4600) Call for inspection 24 hours in advance. ALL DRAINFIELD AREAS MUST BE FENCED OFF prior to wilding site excavation and fencing must remain in place until final site grading. Approval to pou 7 footings will not be grantdd until the Inspections Department has verified the primary and alternae sites are protected. NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF ANY HIND is allowed within 20' f tested a protected. sites ever. ACCEPTED X DENIED_ By the City of Orono subject tq existing regulations and the following c--0,**;-^ df U,%lir .,wvia K Uti t °^t) OPV fr<<.1 Att�5 y C q\\u•w:,.5-12�n1(y Yy yc By: �azC l �bua�m, '7_ L4_o,3 Matt Bolterman, On -Site Systems Manager Date Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.cl.orono.mn.us MOUND DESIGN WORK SHEET (For Flows up to 1200 gpd) Lwdina Rata Gallo! Per dsypar Absorption RaUo A. Average Design FLOW ramsand htadlum Sand InunY Sand 1.20 079 1.00 1 So 1o ,A -l: Estimated Sewage Flows In Gallons per Day Estimated 14 S 0 gpd (see figure A-1) number o bedrooms Clan I Clan 11 Class III Class IV or measured x 1.5 (safety factor) = gpd 2 300 225 180 60% Silty say SaM ary 3 450 300 218 of the B. SEPTIC TANK Ca Capacity p t y 4 600 375 256 values 5 750 450 294 In the 6 900 525 332 Class 1, a - /000 gallons (see figure C-1) 7 1050 600 370 11, or iii I - ISoo -auati y}g,�y(,�y_ y+,us� 8 1200 675 1 408 1 columns. C. SOILS (refer to site evaluation) 011 Se ilc @ak Ca adties flil alions r i t 1. Depth to restricting layer = /��, feet Numbuof Minimum liquid Bedrooms opacity Liquidcapacity with subaso disposal th wrthdicapacty 2. Depth of percolation tests = /• o feet iaslae 3. Texture Lt,{ tail. n 2orless 750 7or4 1000 nu 1500 1500 Percolation rate 5.2 mpi 7, or 9 2W 300 3°p°° 30M 4S 4. Soil loading rate .gpd/sgft (see figure D-33) 5. Percent land slope Mi D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS 011 3. Multi ply average design flow (A) by 0.83 to obtain required crock layer area. L4 0 gpd x 0.83 sgft/gpd =, U 3 sgft-wo*o gOcP Determine rock layer width = 0.83 sqft/gpd x linear Loading Rate 0.83 sqft/gpd x tZ _gpd/sqft = )0 ft Length of rock layer = area + width = 1,0 sgft (D1) + Jo,_ ft (D2) = u 1 ft E. ROCK VOLUME 1. 2. 3. (LLR Mound LLR < 120 MPI <12 > 1,20 MPI < 6 Multiply rock area (Dl) by rock depth of 1 ft to get cubic feet of rock 4) 0 sgft x 1 ft = 910 cuft Divide cuft by 27 cult/cuyd to get cubic yards 4) 0 cult + 27 cuyd/cult = ) S' cuyd Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons —ice cuyd x 1.4 ton/cuyd = - ;Q_ tons SEWAGE ABSORPTION WIDTH ption width equals absorption ratio (See Figure D-33) rock layer width (D2) a c� x Jct ft = a� ft D-33: Absorption Width Sizing Table Per lattan Rate In MI�per 1 soil Texnus Lwdina Rata Gallo! Per dsypar Absorption RaUo Faster than ramsand htadlum Sand InunY Sand 1.20 079 1.00 1 So 1o .00 .< 46w60 swlra.y Slit Clay Lam 0,45 2.67 1 to 120 Silty say SaM ary 0.24 5.00 ower Wet 1204 •a umdd tartaw nth rnM haanm Put.=