The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland info . i i � � ,; � SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES � r;``'� Providing the Sharper Edge in Natural Resources&Environmental Consulting �� r��. June 15, 2010 Michael Huthwaite 7155 Ainsworth Drive Germantown, T'N 38138 RE: SER Project Name: 3382 Bayside Road SER Project No: 2009-048-03 Project Location: Part of Section 5, T118N, R23W, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Letter Purpose: Addendum to original delineation report dated October 12, 2009 Dear Mr. Huthwaite, As you know there was some question as to whether the delineated wetland boundary(Wetland 1) completed by SER in October of 2009 was accurate given that the majority of the delineated area consisted of stream bank. Wetland 1 was originally delineated as a riverine wetland but because much of the delineated area contained steep and abrupt slopes without wetland vegetation present, the Local Government Unit(LGU), Becky Houdek, proposed that only fringe areas containing the mandatory dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil and hydrology criteria shouid be delineated as jurisdictional wetland. The remaining areas exhibiting steep slopes that lead directly into flowing water with a sandy stream bed and where vegetation is unable to proliferate, are not considered wetland. Lynda Peterson of BWSR also agreed with this proposal. Therefore, SER revisited the subject parcel on May 15,2010 and modified the original wet(and delineation based on this guidance. SER delineated three areas (Areas A, B and C) along the fringe of the stream as jurisdictional wetland.See the Figure section far a depiction of the GPS located wetland boundary Areas A,B and C. The three areas fell within the horseshoe portions of the meandering stream which contained depositional soil that was mostly sandy.Hydrophytic vegetation was also dominant in these areas at the time of the site visit. Hydrology was largely based on primary indicators of saturation and high water table observed within the boreholes. See the Data Sheets section at the end of this report for a detailed description of the sample data for each ofthe delineated wetland areas.All three delineated areas were classified by SER as Type 2/3 PEMB/C wetlands. Wetland Areas A, B and C are subject to review by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and approval by the LGU.SER advises that no grading or any other alterations be made to wetland areas until the approval has been made by the proper regulating authorities. 25580 Nelsine Drive • Shorewood,MN 55331 (952) 471-1100 • (952) 471-0007 (Fax) , . Christine Mattson From: Smyth, John R [John.Smyth@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:41 PM To: Christine Mattson Cc: Amundsen, Darren T Subject: RE: WCA Boundary NOA- 3382 Bayside Drive, Orono Christine, I reviewed the correspondence. The watershed had the wetland delineator remove the creek portion from the wetland boundary. This results in wetland boundary that is smaller. As a result the Gronberg survey shows more area that is being protected by buffer then is necessary. Unless the landowner requests a change I would go with the Gronberg survey that shows the wetland buffer along wetland and the creek. Let me know if you have questions. John 7ohn Smyth Associate Direct 651-604-4708 Cel I 651-775-5104 john.smyth@bonestroo.com � Bone�troo Visit the new Bonestroo.com to sign-up for SourceONE, our upcoming newsletter. From: Christine Mattson [mailto:CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:18 PM To: Smyth, John R Subject: FW: WCA Boundary NOA - 3382 Bayside Drive, Orono Sorry, John, I had your email incorrect the first time. From: Christine Mattson Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:16 PM To: 'Amundsen, Darren T; 'jsymth@bonestroo.com' Cc: Melanie Curtis Subject: FW: WCA Boundary NOA - 3382 Bayside Drive, Orono Hello, I received this amended wetland delineation for 3382 Bayside Drive (09-3428). Is there anything we need to be aware of or change on our end? Thanks! i Christine Mattson 952-249-4620 From: Becky Houdek [mailto:BHoudek@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:48 PM To: Lynda.Peterson@state.mn.us; Melissa Jenny; Melissa.Doperalski@dnr.state.mn.us; stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us; mhuthwaite@buckman.com; Brian Burgner; Christine Mattson Subject: WCA Boundary NOA - 3382 Bayside Drive, Orono Good afternoon, Please see the attached WCA Notice of Application for a wetland delineation at 3382 Bayside Road in Orono.The application is also attached. Comments on this application will be accepted until July 22, 2010. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Thanks, Becky Houdek MCWD Wetlands Technician 1 8202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 952.471.0590 x226 www.minnehahacreek.ora �. � MINNEHAHA CREEK WA7ER$►+ED �IST�tICf 2 , , Please feel free to contact Brian Burgner or Frank Svoboda or at (952) 471-1100 if you have any questions regarding the information in this report addendum. SER appreciates the opportunity to assist you with this project and we look forward to serving any future needs that you might have. Sincerely, Svoboda Ecological Resources � _. __ _'`�� Brian K. Burgner, WDC Wetland Ecologist II Cc. Becky Houdek(Minnehaha Creek Watershed District) Melissa Jenny (Army Corps of Engineers) Lynda Peterson (Board of Water and Soil Resources) Stacey Lijewski (Hennepin Conservation District) � � Figure � t t. _ �, � .. . . " �+f , �� , ;� ... �:�' � . �� i-. �� j..�, �� I� �Approximate Parcel Boundary �. ` .sm y- ,, �; � , � „ ' � �� ; _�. � � � . ,t�,�, � Stream . � , :.- � III� .�' � . �i I � .v�h �� '�i� �� Wetland Boundary ��: � � � �,� � � 'R�`Y .. � .`� . .+ n .�� r.. � Sample Points �, ,. • �^' t��=� . � .,. .. � x � d� : . � ,:.: �' � v,�d� i � a ` W x �� k� � x� �,� � r.�S. �: ,.� �_el ��a��a� ,a � �,�" 4.�, � �,. � . 4:x . ,i4 .[kh. A '.: �" m i�� ` �n� � �`''. + 4r �.� � � 1.: - p �,.., .... '_ ... �.� � :, ":`. . :.`-.3 k � �� ,. . .. - ��, . � ^x� ... � . . . . � ��"`} ,,� .„ � _ � �:. � Y ... .: „. , � � 1 F i � `' . a'Ii \ . . ar. / :. S_v.f , �. . � 3 (�_/� a ,;� .;.:_:: �.� CJY4N • � .q,.. ,:. .,__.. , �. 0 �� ' '� i � _ p �� 'S�� . -q= �. .. � � .. " . > , ,�"� �� . �' a ' � 0 Y,� _ . ,.. (�� ri,.r„-�r. -� _ . s..� ,�� ,�� . .... . C1Y9�J � � .. ' �,` � -} C - � . - • � � :c�c, ��. � � :� � _` � i :�� , � . _ � �� ., � : o � �, �_�, ��: � �_ � � _ t o - '�,�,� � . _ ,� � ,.. � � e _ �rra ��- u E. �� f. � .� , :,.-... � �.. , �. r: � _�... ,. � �� '�� t, p. ,. �d� ��.,�,, �. °i ?i � � �::: F �_. ' s'�� k '��. . . +°�'' .. . u�', r _ �. , ,.,. . ,�� . ��..: ,, . , ,� ... � ,::.... _r .,.,,� ,? Part of Sec. 5 Revised GPS Located N Figu re 1 T118N, R23W. U: _� � Wetland Boundary Map , Overlaid on 2006 Aerial Image 2009-048 .��SVOBQDA o �5 3o so 3382 Bayside Road �M'� Ecological Resources Feet Orono, MN 1 f Data Sheets � ' � : SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES � ,�� -� �.. , ��,�1� �fetlunds lnventory 8c Delineutron•Fisheries• Wildlr�e •Naturul Communitic:.ti� P��e: 3382 Bayside Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin ��pate: 5-25-10 ApplicanVOwner: Michael Huchwaite State: � Sampling Point: sP'A Wet Investigator(s): BKB Section.Township,Ref1Qe: Part of Section 5,Ti 18N,R23w LendtOrtn(hillslope.teRece.etC.): Bas1n LoCel relief(ConCev@,COnvCx,�Or18): None Sbpe(%): Lat: Long: Datum: �983 UTM SOiI M8p Uftit N8fT1e: Hamel-Glencoe NWI GBSSifiC8ti0n: None Are dimatic/hydrdogic condRions on the site rypiCal fw this time of yeaft Yes � No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Sal ,or Mydrology significantly disturbed7 Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes � No Are VegetaGon ,Sal ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area within a Wedand? Yes � No HydriC Soi1 Ptesent? YeS � No Distance from Delineated Edge `�Ft. Above Below � 1NeUand Hydrology Present? Yes `' No Remetks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worlcaheet: Tree Stratum (Poot sizes: 3�f� ) %Cover Scecies? Status Number ot Dominant Species 1• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Fraxtnus/iennsy[vnniui �$ ✓ FACW Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Acxoss All Strata: 4 (8) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5� That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �� (A/B) Total Cover: �5 SadinalShrub Stretum ( ��-� ) Prevalenc�Index workshaet: 1. Total 96 Cover ot: MuRiDlv bv: 2. OBL species 15 x� , I 5 3. FACW species �s x 2- �so 4. FAC speCies 20 x 3= 60 5. FACU species x 4= Total Cover: UPL species x 5= Nerb Stratum ( sl,��-°�� ) i�0 22s Column Totals: (A) (B) ' /.nportencnnndensis 25 ✓ FACW 2 Amphlcarpaea bracreara 20 ✓ FAC Pf@y81@11C@ If1dCX =8✓A= �.OS 3 Phalaris arundinacea 20 ✓ FACW HydrophytlC Vs��t�NOn IndiCatOrf: 4 Angelica atropurpurea 15 OBL '' DOf111�8�1CC T@St i5>5096 r� hydrophy(!um virginionum 15 FACW � Prevalence Index is s3.0' g, Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a seperate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic vegetadon'(Explain) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. T0�81 COVBf: 95 Woodv�ne Stratum ( 3n-ri ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon 2' Present4 Yes '' No Total Cover: Remarics: (InGude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 �I��SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES �; '" Il i•ilun�l�litrrnturt K l)clinrnli�+n•l i�hrrir�•It il<(!i/r•\<riru�ul('��nur�tini�ir� SOIL Sampling Point: SP-A Wet Proflla Descrlption: (Describe to the d�pth�aeded to document ths indicato►or coMirtn d»absance ot indicators.) Depth Mat�ix Redox Features (inches) Cdor(mdstl _� Color(mois8 _� �YDC�—Loc� Texture Remarks 0-6 lOYR 3/2 �oo LS 6-18 lOYR 3/2 �oo lOYR 4/4 5 C M SCL Medium/Distinct 'T : C=Concentration,D=Oe etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore U�i ,M=Matrix. Hydric Sofl Indicaton: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) = Sandy Redox(S5) _ iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Bladc Histic(A3) _ Stripped Mahix(S6) _ Other(Expiain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ SVatified Layers(A5) ^ Loemy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 2 cm Mudc(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Da�lc Surface(A1 t) _ Redox DaAc Su�face(F6) _ Thick Oark Surtece(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F� 'Indicators of hydrophyliC vegetetion and _ Sendy Mucky Minerai(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wedand hydrology must be prosent. 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Restrictive Laver(H observadl: Type: Depth(inChes): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Priman Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that a�niv) $eCondarv Indicators(minimum of two reouired) _ Su�iace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquetic Fauna(613) _ Drainage Pattems(610) � Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(814) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(Bt) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Uving Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vsible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ DriR Oeposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) � Geomorphic PasiUon(02) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Reoent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) � FAC•NeuUal Test(DS) _ Iron Deposits(BS) _ Thin Mudc SuAace(C7) _ Inundatfon Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Deta(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SuAaoe(88) _ Other(E�cplain in Remarks) FINd Obsarvatlons: SuAace Water Present? Yes No '' DepM(inches): Water Table Preserri? Yes '' No Depth(inches): �5 SaturaGon Present? Yes '' No Depth(inches): g Wetland Hydrology Prossnt� Yes � No indudes ca Ila fi Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),ii available: Remarks: US Army Corps ot Engineers Midvvest Region—DRAFT Version&1-2007 � ��f/ � : SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Y� � ;��` Wetlands lnventory& Delineution•Fisheries• WildliJc� •,�V'uturul Communitie.ti� ProjecUSfte: 3382 Bayside Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin ��i�Date: 5-25-10 AppliCenUOwne►: Michael Huthwaite State: MN Sampling POint: SP-A Up If1VC3t198t0�(S): BKB Section,Township,R8f1g@: Part of Section 5,TI 18N,R23W Landiorm(hitlslope,terrace,etc.): upslope �oca��e�iet(concave,convex,f10r1C): None Sbpe(%): Let: Long: Datum: 19g3 UTM SOiI Mep U�it NemC: Hamel-Glencoe NWI G8SSi6C0ti0n: None Are dimatic/hydrologic�itions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes '� No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significaMy disturbed9 Are"Nortnal Circumstances"present? Yes � No Are Vegetation ,Saii ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? pf needed,expiain any answers in Remartcs.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling polnt locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophy6C Vegetation Present� Yes � No Is the Samplad Area within a WeUand? Yes No � H ric Soil Present? Yes No '' � Distance irom Delineated Edge 5 Ft. Above � Below Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � RemaAcs: VEGETATION—Use scient�c names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanoe Test worksheet: Tree SUatum (Plot sizes: 30f� ) �Se9� �� t�t� Number of�ominant Species 1• That Are OBI,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Fr�xlnu.s penne_tdvnnicn j 5 ✓ FACW Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across Ail Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5� That Are OBL,FACW,w FAC: 100 �ag� Total Cover: �5 �a;nu/Shrub Stratum ( �'-f ) Prevalence Index worlcsheet: 1. Totai 96 Cover of: MuRiolv bv: 2. OBL species x 1= 3. FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= Total Cover: UPL Speaes x 5= k�erb Saatum ( 'f��-"�� ) Cdumn Totals: (A) (B) � Laponencanadensi.s 2� ✓ FACW 2 Amphicarpaea braGeala 15 ✓ FAC Pf@V81C�CC 1(f�CX =BIA= 3 Phuluris urundmuceu 10 FACW HydrophytlC VsgetiHOn IndiCato►i: 4 Pou prutensis 25 ✓ FAC � Domi�ance Test is>50% � Glecoma hederacea FACU Pf@Vel@f1CC(�1d@X IS 53.0� g. Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a sepa�ate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation'(Explain) 9. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must �� be present. Totel Covet: �� Woodv Vine Stratum ( 30�� ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation 2' Pretent? Yet � No Total Cover: Remarks: (Indude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—DRAFT Version 8-1-2007 .��;�;�S�'OBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES �< . r '�� Ili��lun�l�lrrrrnlurr R l)rlrn.uriun•hi�lrrrir�•Ifihlhl. •\ulur�d C��mnun�i�ir� SOIL Sampling Point: SP-A Up Profile Desc►iptfon: (Dascribe to the dapth naeded to document tl�e indicator or cor�firm the abse�ce of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color lmastl �_ Color(moist) �_ Tvoer—Loc� Texture Remarks 0-5 IOYR 3/1 loo SL 5-15 lOYR 3/l ioo SCL 15-18 lOYR 3/2 �oo lOYR 3/2 l c tv� SCL Few/Faint 'T : C=ConcenVation.D=De etion.RM=Reduoed MaVix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. =Location: PL=Pore Lini ,M=Matrix. Hyd�ic Soil Indicators: Indicaton tor Problemat(c Hydr�c Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gbyed Mat�ix(S4) _ Coast Prai�ie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(SS) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ BlaCk Histic(A3) _ Stripped Metrix(S6) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(M) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) SVatified Layers(A5) _ Loartry Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ 2 Cm Mudc(A10) _ Depleted Malrix(F3) _ Depleted 8elow Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Thick Dark SuAace(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F'� 'Indicatws of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressio�(F8) weUand hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Restrictive Laver(ii observedl: Type: �P��$)� Hydric Soil PresentT Yes No � Remarks: HYDROLOGY W�dand Hydroloyy Indicators: Pnmarv InQicetors(minirtwm of one is reauired:check afl that a�uNl $econden Indicators(minimum ot Mro reauired) _ Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soii Cracka(B6) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Drainage Pattems(B10) _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Ozidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ SaturaUon Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ DriR Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(G) _ Geomorphic PosiUon(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Reoent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soiis(C6) � FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck SuAace(C7) _ Inundatlon vsible on Aerial Imegery(67) _ Gauge or Well Data(D9) _ Sparsey Vegetated Concave Surface(88) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Fleld Obsarvatlons: Surface Water Present? Yes No � Depth(inches): Water Table PreseM? Yes No '' Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No '' Depih(indies): Wetland Hydrology Prewnt� Yes No � indudes ca illa hi Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring weli,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: RemaAcs: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-ORAFT Version 8-1-2007 i ` � SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES , ;�� . ��,�� Wellands lnventnry& De/ineution•Fisheries• Wi/dlr/e •Nutural Comnrunitic.ti� ProjecVSite: 3382 Bayside Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin �mpling Date: 5-25-]0 ApplieanUOwner. Michael Huthwaite State: � SBmpling Point: SP-B WET Investigator(s): BKB SeCfion,TOwnship,Ref19@: Part of Section 5,Tl 18N,R23W Landfortn(hitlslope,teRace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex,nOf1C): None Siope(96): LeL Long: Datum: 19g3 UTM SOiI Mep UnR Nethe: Hamel-Glencoe NWI C18ssifiCetion: None Are dimatic/►rydrologic cor�ditions on the site lypical fw this time of yeer? Yes � No pf no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Nortnal CirCumstanoes"present? Yes � No Are Vegetation ,Sal ,or Hydrology naturally problemaOc7 (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showfng sampling point locattons,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area withln a WeUand? Yos � No Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No DisWnce from Delineated Edge 5 Ft. Above Below ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes '' No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pomi�ance Test worfcaheet: Tree Suatum (Plot sizes: 30j ) 96 Cover Soecies� Status Number of Dominant Species L That Are OBL.FACW,or FAC: '' (A) 2 Fraxmuv/ienns.rlvnnicn IS ✓ FACW Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: loo �aB� Total Cover: 15 $adfna/Shrub Stratum ( 1'f' ) Provalence Ind�x workaheet: 1, Total%Cover of: MuftiDfv bv: 2. OBL species 5 x t = �� 3. FACW species so x 2_ ibo 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species z 4= Totel Cover: UPL SpeCies z 5= �Stl8tUR1 5-jt(!-mJ N � � Column Totals: 85 (A) 170 (B) � ],�ponen cnnadens�s 3� ✓ FAC W 2. C'G/eX 5'fl. IS _"""" P(BVaIBnCC If1deX ��A� Z.� 3 hydrophy!lum vrrginrunum 20 ✓ FACW Hydrophytte Vepatatlon Indicaton: 4 Osmundu cinnumomeu 15 FACW � Dominance Test is>5096 5 Angelicu utropurpureo 5 OBL " Prevalence Index is 53.0' g, Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remerks or on a separate sheet) 8 _ P�oblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 9. 'IndiCetors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 10. be present. Totel Cover. gs woodv vine Sttatum ( so fi � �. Hydrophytic V�getation Z' Pnsent? Yet '' No Totel Covet: Remarks: (InG�e photo numbers here or on a separate sheetJ US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 ��,�;�SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES �: •. il i•N�utd.�brrrnturi 8 /)rGnru�inn•l ichrrrr.•II iL!(iJr•\u�uru!Cr+mnrtnti�i:� SOIL Sampling Point: sP-B WET Profila Description: (Doscriba to the depth n�edad to document ths indicator or conflrm tho absence of fndicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cdor(mastl �_ Color(moist) � �vce�LocT Texture RemaAcs 0-4 lOYR 3/2 �oo SL 4-8 lOYR 3/2 �oo SCL $-1g 10YR4/2 100 l�YR4/4 10 C M SCL Medium/Distinct 'T : C=ConcenVaGon,D=De etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,C�Covered w Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pwe Lini ,M=Matrix. Hyd�ic Soil Indicators: Indicators tor Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16} _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Iron-Manga�se Masses(F12) _ Bladc Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ loartry Mucky Mineral(F1) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 2 cm Mudc(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) '' Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dahc SuAace(F6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and Sandy MuGry Minerai(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wedand hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3} Restrictfve Laver(ii observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hyd�ic Sotl Presant? Yes � No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wedand Hydrology Indicaton: Priman Indicators(minimum o(one is reauired:check atl that ao�lvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum ot tw�o reauiredl Suriace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cradcs(B6) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Drainage Pattems(610) '' Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(814) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Bunows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ SaturaUon Vslble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposfts(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) � Geomorphic Positlon(D2) _ Algal Mat o►Crusl(84) _ Reoent Iron ReduCtion in Tilied Soils(C6) � FAC-NeuVal Test(DS) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Mudc Surface(C7) Inundatlon�sible on Ae�al Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SuAace(88) _ Other(Explain in Remarics) Fl�ld Obsarvadons: SuAace Water Present? Yes No '' Depth(inches): Water Table PreseM? Yes No '' Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes '' No Depth(inches): �2 Wetland Hydrology Prosant� Yes � No indudes ca illa fi Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),ii available: Rema�ics: US Army Corps ot Engineers Midwest Region—DRAFT Version 8-1-2007 � i ' � _ SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES _�� .�1"• �tietlund.i• lnventnry& Delineation•Fishc�rie.r• Wildlife •;�u�ura!Comnrunities ProjeCUSite: 3382 Bayside Road City/Counly: Orono/Hennepin $ampling Dete: 5-25-10 ��v��, Michael Huthwaite EWP State: � Sampling Point: SP-B Up Investigator(s): BKB S@CtIOn,TOwnShip,R8f1ge: Part of Section 5,Tl 18N,R23W Larxttorm(hillslope,terrace,etc.): upslope �ocal reliet(concave,convex,f10(18): None Slope(%): Lat: Lo�g: Datum: 1983 UTM SOII M8p U(11t NBmE: Hamel-Glencoe NWI CI8S3i6C2GOn: None Are dimaGc/hydrdogic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no,explain in Remarlcs.) Are Vegetation ,Sal ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? Yes � No Are Vegetation .Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locatfons,transects, impo�tant features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present7 Yes `' No Is tha Sampled Area withln s Wedand? Yas No � Hydric Soil Ptesent? Yes � No Distance from Delineated Edge 5 Ft. Above ✓ Below Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scient�c names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicetor pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot sizea: 30-r� ) �L � �� Number ot Dominant Species �• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Fraeinuspennaylvnnico 25 ✓ FACW 3 Prcea gru„�u t s ✓ pACu Total Number of Dominant 6 Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5� That Are OBI,FACW,or FAC: 83 (A/B) Totel Cover: 40 ding/Shn�b Stratum ( �'j ) Prevalence Ind�x worlcsheet: 1. Total 96 Cover ot: MuRioN bv: 2. OBl species �s x� = 30 3. FACW species �s X 2- �so 4. FAC speaes 5 x 3= �5 5. FACU species 15 x 4= Total Cover: UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum ( s'�`�r-"'� ) t io ��o Column Totals: (A) (B) � Lnponencnnadensi.r 2� ✓ FACW 2 Alliuriu petiolatu 5 FAC Pf@V81@I1C@(�dCX =B/A= 1.5 3 hydrophyllum virginrunum 15 ✓ FACW Hydrophytic Vsg�taHon Indicaton: 4 Osmunda cinnamomea 15 ✓ FACW � �pR11f18f1CC T@81 IS>�9{� 5 Anhelicu utropurpureu 15 ✓ OBL � Prevalence Index is 53.0' g. Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegeta0on'(Explain) 9. 'IndiCatoB of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 10. be present. Total Cover. �� woodv Vne Stratum ( j0f� ) 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation 2' Present? Yes � No Total Cover: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-ORAFT Version 6-1-2007 }��;:��,SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES i<: 'i: Il i�l/und�lacrmurt'cC /)c/rnruliun•/7.ltr�ii�•11 il<I/il�'•1 ulrirul('unrnnutirir� SOIL Sampling Point: SP-B Up Proflle DascripNon: (Desc�ibe to the d�pth needed to document ths indlcator or confirm the absence ot indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inchesl Cdor(mdsU �_ Color(moist) �_ Tvce�—Loc� Texture RemaAcs 0-10 lOYR 2/1 loo SL 10-15 2.SY 5/4 too SCL 15-20 2.SY 5/4 l00 7.SYR 4/6 5 C M SCL Medium/Distinct 'T : C=ConcenUation,D=De etion,RM=Reduoed Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Lini ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicaton: Indicators for Prablematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(SS) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Bladc Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S8) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loartry Mudry Mineral(F1) _ Stratified layers(A5) _, Loamy Gieyed Matrix(F2) 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) � Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Suriace(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depieted Dark Surtace(F� 'Indicatws of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy MuCky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressio�(F8) weGand hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Restrictiva La�rer(H obaerved): Type: Depth(inches): Hydrfe Soil Presont? Yes � No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrolopy Indicaton: Primanr Indicators(mini�m of one is reauired:check aU that aooNl $eCondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl _ Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(69) _ Surface Soil Cradcs(B6) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Drainage Pattems(610) _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(614) _ Dry-Season Wate�Table(C2) _ Weter Merks(Bt) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Creyfish Bunows(C8) _ Sediment Depoaits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation vsible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drill Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Geomorphic Position(02) _ Algal Mat w Crust(64) _ Reoent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) � FAC-NeuVal Test(DS) Iron Deposits(BS) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) Inundabon Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave SuKaoe(B8) _ Ofhe►(Explain in Remarks) FINd Observadons: Surface Water Present? Yes No '' Depth(inc�es): Water Table Present? Yes No `' Depth(inches): Saturation Present7 Yes No '' Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology PresantT Yas No � indudes ca illa fin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps ot Engineers Midwest Region-DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 i ' � : SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES �,�� '��;��` Wetlunds Inventory c4c Delinctution•Fisheries• Wildlife •Nuturul Contmunities ProjeeUSfte: 3382 Bayside Road C��ry: Orono/Hennepin ��Date: 5-25-10 AppliCentlOwne�: Michael Huthwaite State: MN Sempling Polnt: SP-C WE"I Investigator(s): BKB Section,Township,Ren9@: Part of Section 5,Tl 18N,R23W �andtorm(hillslope,teRace,etc.): basin �oca1 re�ief(concave,convex,tlOtl@): None Sbpe(%): Lat: Long: Datum: 1983 UTM SOiI Mep U�it NBme: Hamel-Glencoe NWI ClesSifiCdtion: None Are dimatic/hydrdogic condftions on the site typical for fhis time of yea(T Yes � No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed7 Are"Nortnal Circumstances"present? Yes '� No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally probiemadc? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showi�g sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes '' No �s Ms Samplad Area within a Wadand7 Yas � No Hyd�ic Soil Ptesent7 Yes '' No Distance irom Delineated Edge 5 Ft. Above Below ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes '' No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scient�c names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test woAcaheet: Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 30fr ) �Se9�L � �_ Number of Dominant S Acere�accharinum 25 � PACW �� 4 1• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 2 Fraxinu.s/iennnylvnnica IS �/ FACW 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5� That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: t oo �� Total Cover: ''0 �Dlin�/Shrub Stratum ( �'-f ) Prevalence Indsx worlcsheet: 1. Total 96 Cover of: MuRi�iv bv: 2. OBL species x 1 = 3. FACW speCies 9' x 2= ��0 4. FAC speCies 45 x 3= 135 5. FACU SpeGes x 4= Total Cover: UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum ( 5-��-^�� ) Column Totals: 10 (A) 32' (8) � /.aporreacnnndero�i.r 45 ✓ FACW .j Phnlnris arurufinncen 45 ✓ FAC Prevalence Index S 8//4= 23 3. Hydrophytic Vs��tation Indicaton: 4, � Dominance Test is>5096 5. '' Prevalence Index is s3.0' g. Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic VegetaGon'(Explain} 9. 10. '�ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover. `'0 iNoodv Vine Stratum ( sn fr � 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation 2' Present? Yes � No Total Cover: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 �I��;�SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES � �� 1{i•Il<ind�hnr�Nurr cf' l)c(inrulirm•Fi�hrrir�•(I71<(!i/r•\uhn�d(unrnuiniric� SOIL Sampling Point: SP-C WET Profile Desc�iption: (Dsscribe to the dopth needed to document the indicator or cordirm the absence ot indicators.) Depfh Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(mastl �_ Color(moisU �_ Tvue�Loc� Texture Remarks 0-10 IOYR 3'3 100 LS 10-17 lOYR 4/2 100 I OYR 3/4 10 C M SL Medium/Distinct 17-19 lOYR 4/2 100 lOYR 3/4 IO C M SCL Medium/Distinct 'T : C=ConcenVaGon,O=De etion,RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. =Location: PL=Pore Lini ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) � Sandy Redox(S5) _ Iron-Ma�anese Masses(F12) _ Bladc Histic(A3) _ SVipped Metriz(S6) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Stratified�ayers(A5) ^ loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 2 an Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted 8elow Darlc Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Suriace(F6) _ Thidc Dark Surtace(Al2) _ Oepleted Dark Surface(Fn 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) weUand hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mudry Peat or Peat(S3) ResMctfve Lave�(if obseroed►: Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soll Presant? Yes � No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Weda�d Hydrology indicaton: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aonM �scondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl _ SuAace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(69) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Teble(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Drainage Pattems(B10) � Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(814) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marics(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ CrayBsh Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation vsible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ DriR Deposits(B3) _ Presenoe of Reduced Iron(C4) � Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Atgal Mat w Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(CS) = FAC-Neutral Test(OS) Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) Inundatlon Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or We0�ate(D9) _ Sparaey Vegelated Concave Surface(88) _ Other(E�lain in Remarks) FINd Obsarvatlons: Surface Water PreseMT Yes No '' Oepth(inches): Water Tab►e PreseM? Yes No '' Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes '' No Depth(inches): �� Wetiand Hydrology Prossnt? Yss � No indudes ca illa fi e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspeCtions),it available: Rematks: US Army Corps of Enpir�ers Midwest Region—ORAFT Version 8-i-2007 . � , i ��,� SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES �� '�Y � ��` Weticmu+s Inventory& Delrneution•Fisheries• Wildlife•Nuttrral Communitie.ti� ProjeeUSite: 3382 Bayside Road CityJCounty: �rono/Hennepin �mpling Dafe: 5-25-10 AppllCenVUM18C Michael Huthwaite State: MN Sempling POlnt: SP-C UP Investigator(s): BKB SCdIOn,TOWfl3hlp,Rat19@: Part of Section 5,"rl 18N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terraoe,etc.): Upslope Local relief(concave,convex,f10l1C): None SIOpe(%): Let: long: Detum: �983 UTM Soil Mep Unit Neme: Hamel-Glencoe NWI CleSsifiCdtton: None Are dimatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical fw this time of year7 Yes � No (Ii no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Sal ,or Hydrology significanty disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes '� No Are Vegetation ,Sal ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Ii needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling pofnt locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Veyelation Present� Yes '' No is the Sampled Ares within a Wetland? Yes No � Hydric SOiI Pre86nt? Yes No � Distance from Delineated Edge!� Ft. Above � Below Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scient�c names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominsnce Test woAcsheet: Tree Stratum (PIOt SiZe3: 30-jr ) �S4YSL �� d�. Number of Dominant SpeCies � Acer saccharrnum 25 ✓ FACW �at�e�Bl.FACVV,Of FAG': ' (A) 2 Frnsinw-/�ennsylvantcn 15 ✓ FACW 3 Total Number oi Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Oominant Species 5• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �oo �ag� Total Cover: 40 Sadina/Shrub Stratum ( �'f ) Prevalence Index waricahaet: �. Total 96 Cover of: MuRinlv bv: y. OBL speCies x 1 = 3. FACW species x 2= 4. FAC Species x 3= 5, FACU species z 4= Total Cover: UPL species x 5= Nerb Stretum ( 5-f�!�-"�� ) Cdumn TOt818: (A) (B) �. Laporteacnnadensis 75 ✓ FACW 2 Al[iaria periolnm 5 FAC Prevalence Index =�A= .3 Angelicaarropurpureo 5 OBL Hydrophytic Veg�btlon Indicaton• 4 hyrlrophyllum virginianum io Fncw Dpmi�ance Test is>5096 5. Prevalence Index is 53.0' g. Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 7. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegeta0on'(Explain) 9. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 10. be present. Total Cover: ys Woodv�neStratum ( 30fi ) �, Hydrophytic Vsgetation 2' Present4 Yes � No Total Cover: Remarks: (InGude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 . ,��SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES j� . i: '�� Ili•�Icm�b hrrrnlnrr d' !)rlinrurinn•I'iclirrir�•I{il<!!i/r•\ultrrul(unirnunuir� SOIL Sampling Point: sP-C irn Profile O�scription: (Describe to the depth n�eded to document the indleator or coMirm the absence ot indlcators.) Depth Matrix r (inches) Cdor(mdstl _� Color(moisq �_ Tvoe Texture Remarks 0-]0 10YR4/2 ]00 LS ]0-14 lOYR 3/1 100 SL 14-20 lOYR 3/1 100 SCL 'T : C=ConcenVation,D=De etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lini ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicatws to�Problamatic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Hisdc Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Other(Ezplain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Stratified Leyers(A5) ^ Loemy Gteyed Matrix(F2) 2 cm Mudc(A70) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark SuAaCe(A11) _ Redox�ark Suriace(F6) _ Thidc Dark Surtace(At2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F� 'Indicators of hydrophyGc vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mudry Peat or Peat(S3) Rsatrictive Laver(H observadl: Type: Depth(inches): Hyd�ic Soil Presant? Yea No � Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wedand Hydroloyy Indicaton: P�imarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:G►eck all that a�olvl �ndarv Indicators(minimum of Mro reauiredl _ Surfaoe Water(A1) _ Water-Stafned Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soi1 Cracks(86) _ High Water Table(A2) _ AquaUc Fauna(B13) _ Orainage Pattems(810) _ Saturation(A3) _ True AquatiC Plents(814) _ Ory-Season Weter Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation vsible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Geomorphic Positlon(D2) _ Algai Mat or Crust(84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilied Soils(C6) _ FAC-NeuVal Test(DS) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Mudc SuAace(C7) _ Inundatlon Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) _ Gauge or Well Data(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BS) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) FINd Obsarvadons: Surfaoe Water PreseM? Yes No � Depth(inches): Water Table PreseM? Yes No '' Depth(ind�es): Saturation Present? Yes No � Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � indudes ca illa fi Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitorinfl well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if availabie: Remarks: US Army Corps ot Engineers Midvuest Region-DRAFT Version 6-1-2007 � � � � � � �� / � � o � f � � I 1. Project/Site Information ProjectlSite Name: 3382 Bayside Road Local Government Un t: MCWD Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): Same as site name 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Mike Huthwaite Address: 7155 Ainsworth Drive City> State, zip: Germantown, TN, 38138 E-maif: mhuthwaite@buckman.com Phone: (901} 351-7741 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): SER �ontact Person: Brian Burgner Address: 25580 Nelsine Drive City, State, Zip: Shorewood MN, 55331 E-mail: brianb@gpsinnovations.com Phone: g52-471-1100 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: pp Wetland Boundary (must atiach wetland delineation report} ❑x Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, lhe applicant requests a determination from ihe Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetlanc� boundary and Eype information in this application. The applicant also affirms t at�t y are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the lan�wne to pursu is eter �nation. ; ` _.- -- ��' - /C� A icant or thoriz d Agent ign ure Date lmportant Notes: • 7he applicant may be required to submit multipfe copies of the reporUinformation to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies direct(y to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirernents. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11l10/08 A � Y Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd, Dee haven,MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Michael Huthwaite 3382 Bayside Road Application Number 6/18/10 W10-04 T e of A lication check all that a 1 ; � Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑Banking Plan Summ and descri tion of ro osed ro'ect attach additional sheets as necess Michael Huthwaite has applied for approval of a revised wetland boundary for the parcel located at 3382 Bayside Drive in the City of Orono(PID#OS-117-23-14-0035).A wetland delineation for this property was previously completed by Svoboda Ecological Resources(S�R)and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)in October 2009.After further discussion between SER and MCWD, it was detertnined that certain areas of the streambed and bank that were included in the delineation may not meet wetland criteria and should be reassessed.This re-delineation was performed by SER on May 25,2010. The addendum to the original delineation report is attached. The revised boundary will be reviewed in the field by MC WD staff. 2.APPLICATION REVIEW AND DFCISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255,Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Beeky Houdek business-day comment period): District Technician Jul 22,2010 Address(if different than LGU) Date,time, and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following�eld review Deephaven,MN 55391 of the delineation and completion of the comment eriod. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: 952-471-0590 ext.22G � Staff bhoudelc@minnehahacreek.org ❑ Governin Board or Council � , �� 7 /� /� Signature: C �'" .'�l��`�'� Date: .�V r BWSRForms 11-25-09 Page 1 of2 . � � � � � I 3.LIST OF ADDRESSEES i � SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski-stacev.li'ewski co.hennepin.mn.us �, � BWSR TEP member: Lynda Peterson-lvnda.�eterson a,state.mn.us I ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): I ❑ DNR TEY member: �i � DNR Re�;ional Office:Melissa Doperalski-melissa.doperalski e,dnr.state.rrm.ns ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): � Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different):Michael Huthwaite—mhuthwaite(a�buckman.com � Consultant: Svoboda Ecological Resources,Brian Burgner—brianb,�,psinnovations.com i � City; Christine Mattson-cmattson cr,ci.orono.mn.us ❑ Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Melissa Jenny-melissa.m.jenny cr,usace.acm�mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank lan a lications onl : 4. MAILING INFORMATION ➢Far a list of BWSR TEP representatives, see: www.bwsr.statemn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives, see: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf I ➢De artment of Natural Resources Re ional Of�ices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.�col.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 F,.I{wy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy, 15 South Bemid'i,MN 56601 Grand Ra ids,MN 55744 St. Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers, see:www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatoiy/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St.Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul,MN 55101-1638 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul,MN 55155 5. ATTACHNIENTS In addition to the application,list any other attachments: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ f I BWSR Forms 11-25-09 Page 2 of 2 � � - • . - � � - • ' • - • - • � - • ` �- � Name and Address of Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Name of Applicant: Michael Huthwaite Project Name: 3382 Bavside Road Application Number: W 10-04 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Exemption ❑ No Loss ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan � Wetland Boundary/Type Date of Decision: 8/13/2010 Check One: � Approved ❑ Approved with conditlons (see note on page 2 regarding use of wetland banking credits) ❑ Denied Summary of Project/DeClslon(indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420A122,if applicable): The wetland boundary delineated by Svoboda Ecological Resources(SER)at 3382 BaYside Drive in Orono (PID#0511723140035)in October 2009 was revised on May 25, 2010. It was agreed between SER& MCWD that some areas originallv delineated maY not meet wetland critera and should be reassessed. The areas that were classified as wetland in the October 2009 delineation report contained areas with steep slopes and no hydroph, ic vegetation. These characteristics do not meet the criteria to be classified as a jurisdictional wetland. The revised boundacy was reviewed in the field on Jul�16,2010 b�Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD staff. The three wetland areas(Areas A, B and C)were all identified as TXpe 2/3 PEMB/C lwet meadow/shallow marsh)wetlands. Reed canar�grass and Canadian wood nettle were the dominant ve�etation within the wetland. The boundarv with upland was characterized bv an abrupt chan�e in elevation&a transition to primaril, n�_ydrophytic ve etation. The boundat a�-� s flagged in the field and labeled in the addendum to the ori�inal delineation report submitted on June 18, 2010 is accepted by the MCWD. This decision is valid for 3 years.A proiect on this property may require a permit from the MCWD.If vou have any questions, please contact Catherine Bach at 952-471-0590. List of Addressees: Landowner: Michael Huthwaite -Page 1 of 2 W 10-04_Revised Boundary NOD 10/02/07 7155 Ainsworth Drive . Germantown, TN, 3 813 8 Consultant: Svoboda Ecological Resources, Brian Burgner- brianb@gpsinnovations.com City: Christine Mattson - cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Lynda Peterson- lynda.peterson@state.mn.us Stacey Lijewski - staceylijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Department of Natural Resources Regional Office (select appropriate office): NW Kegion: N�Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Regional Director Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE Div.Ecol, Services Div.Ecol.Services lliv.Ecol. Services Bemidji,MN 56601 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Grand Rapids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 DNR TEP Representative (if different than above) Melissa Doperalski -Melissa.Doperalski@dnr.state.mn.us Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only Melissa Jenny- melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above- referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government _ Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0200 and 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal within thirty(30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: -Page 2 of 2 W 10-04 Revised Boundary NOD 10/02/07 � ❑ (For LGUstaff decisions and decisions made (For LCGUdecisions made after a public hearin� without a public hearing, list name and address of Executive Director LGUgoverning body or designated appeal body.) Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 520 Lafayette Road North 18202 Minnetonka Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 Deephaven, MN 55391 NOTE: Approval of Wetland Replacement Plan Applications involving the use of wetland banking credits is conditional upon withdrawal of the appropriate credits from the state wetland bank. No wetland impacts may commence until the applicant receives a copy of the fully signed and executed "Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits," signed by the BWSR wetland bank administrator certifying that the wetland bank credits have been debited. THIS DECISION ONLYAPPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be reqarired. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicant proceeds at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the appeal time period has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised zrnder appeal the applicant is responsible for all wetland impacts. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT 8/13/10 Signature Date Catherine Bach, District Technician Name and Title -Page 3 of 2 W 10-04 Revised Boundary NOD 10/02/07