The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSeptic info � ✓ CITY OF ORONO Date ADDRESS � Connected to CODE SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal Sewer Address �_J '�/ � ��1SID� �1j Property I.D.J�-Il�-�3 %'7 '�r::�-j'� �NELL DATA ,�Standard trench ? � I I l�+rS /C...�/ B i..J� Cc: � Mound o, System type C'� Other Legal Description `�/400 —39oU � � � r Permit No. /�-�� Date of permit — Installer ? £�cNN��Yz � p d No. Bedrooms Garbage � � ( Building type ��DE7'UC E or GPD � $ie '± Laundry X Dishwasher Disposal � o Q E a d SEPTIC TANKS: Material CGwL B Lc`�c� Capacity 1) 2) ° � 'o a Proper outlet and inlet Baffles Liquid depth to RO level � }� � � m � i � Height of tank bottom above water table Distance to nearest building Z� Q N m '`1` O DRAINFIELD: Total length of lines Number of lines Trench width 0 Y C Total treatment area(sq.ft.) Height of drainfield above water table � U Type of filter material Soil type a �• H � E t - Distance from nearest bldg. Tile size Perc rate min/in ° � Q � U N Depth of fill over drainfield Depth of rock over tile under tile ,�, a „ " y E c � p a Cj � � ,I LOCATION �� INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD a �� SKETCH G 1, ��' DATE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS W �/� �7 � ,. � '"'-� /�Z .�o .t u��-.�c i�c> n�o�� 2 /��1 =�`�� , ' �: '� � �Z_ ._� - � ��9�/ ` 3 � , _ ,_ , , � � , ; ` J � lt 1� �� 3� �v 2/ '(o �� cN- � I Include: 1) Well location I 2) Distance from house to � septic tanks,dist.box, an rain ie C— CONFORMING S—SUBSTANDARD N — NONCONFORMING 3) North arrowand road , �i '�,,�x ,., :�d_�� __,, , �- . , �q !SiD€ �� On the North Shore of Lakc Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. � � � Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER �gY"�j�P�.�. /�TP,�� ADDRESS /$iQ� K!�[. PERMIT NO.'S. �� DATES � CONTRACTORS Q��`✓ City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is ,�.an existing system ❑ new construction) � � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properiy, � 2 Does not meet ali current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generaliy in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly; no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. � 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. � 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. �-Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. � within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated �Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system co�dition) Adequate ❑ High water table ❑ Low �"Fair ❑ Lot size �-Medium � Poor �Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible urface disch rge. � � COMMENTS: ��L� � � e- � � �jy�. 5 v�, C�' �n � Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner C � f}' } �� .��r f .R.,��,a, ��'. ` CIT�' of ORONO '+�=s�'<='.,,.�`�_;.,�;3 fr; �l c f'�"� � � `^�'-•�-, Post Office Box 6G•Crystal Bay,Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices ;..!� q,;. rj }.��`��`f � �"'��;;; On the North Shore o(Lake Minnetonka �5 E E � � ... .x _��` ... .. � . ,. .. . . . , April 6 , 1984 i�1rs . Harriet Hehl 3348 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mrs . Hehl : I apologize for any misunderstanding created by either myself or other Orono staff personnel questioned about the legality of the fence constructed last year on Lot l, Block l, Steilows Second Addition. I regret that we have not made it clear that indeed, the fence as constructed and located on the subject property, meets all pertinent standards of the municipal code. The grade changes referenced in your letter (received this office April 2 , 1984 ) were originally approved in a site grading plan submitted sometime in 1981 , the year the building permit for the house was issued . The existing grade along County Road 84 at the time the fence was constructed in1983wasalready established/approvedinl981 although the final site grading work was not completed until early 1983 when the mound septic system was finally installed. The fencing and tennis court were installed at the request of the new owner. The site grading plans presented by the builder in 1981 never revealed fencing along County Road 84 . I would suggest that you make arrangements to visit the City offices so that I may review the entire file with you. At that same time, I will be able to answer any questions you may have concerning the interpretation of the ordinances in relation to the grade changes and location of the fence. If , after that, you wish to protegt the interpretation by staff , there is an appeals procedure application available to all residents that I would be happy to review with you. Bl,'ILUI'�'G & ZONI'�G - 473•7357 • ADMINISTRATION& fINANCE -473-7358 • PUBLIC k'ORKS - 473-7359 ASSESSING 'Mrs . Harriet Hehl April 6 , 1984 Page 2 Please call :my office if you hav:e any questions concerning .the statements made in this letter . . � Sincerely, ��'r"`'�Q l.� ` �` "'"�"�� Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator ps cc : Arthur Burton, 405 Oxford Road Walter R. Benson, City Administrator Thomas J. Jacobs , Building Official