Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-09-2021 Council Packet
Agenda Council Meeting Monday, August 9, 2021 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2021 2. Council Work Session Minutes of July 26, 2021 3. Claims/Bills 4. Approval of Park Gun Club Annual Permit 5. Approval of Rental License 6. Public Works Facility Utility Award 7. Appointment of Public Works Maintenance Worker 8. Approval to Purchase Truck and Components 9. East Long Lake Trail Project (20-029) – Pay Request No. 4 – Final 10. LA21-000045 – Revision LLC, 4535 North Shore Drive, Variance – Resolution No. 7209 11. LA21-000042 – Mohegan Hansen Arch o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Master Development Plan Approval, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat – Resolution No. 7207 12. LA21-000040 – City of Orono Text Amendment related to Dock Licensing – Summary Ordinance No. 260, Third Series. 13. LA21-000046 – City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment #6 – Resolution No. 7210 Public Comments – (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Finance Director Report Community Development Report (Planning Commission Representative Jon Ressler) 14. LA21-000029 – Robert Erickson, 365 Westlake Road., Street Vacation – Resolution No. 7211 15. LA21-000047 – MATCOM: Mark Matasovsky o/b/o Temple Israel of Minneapolis, 645 Tonkawa Road, Variances City Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report Agenda Council Meeting Monday, August 9, 2021 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us Mayor/Council Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2021 08-16-21 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Dennis Walsh) 08-23-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 08-23-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 09-05-21 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 09-06-21 Park Commission Meeting, Tuesday, 6:00 p.m. 09-13-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 09-13-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 09-20-21 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Richard F. Crosby II) 09-27-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 09-27-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 5 ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members, Aaron Printup, Richard Crosby III, and Victoria Seals. City Council Member Matt Johnson was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards, Public Works Superintendent David Goman, Finance Director Ron Olson, and Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 12, 2021 2. CLAIMS/BILLS 3. APPROVAL OF RENTAL LICENSE 4. APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTANT – CARRIE KRIENKE 5. PARKS AND GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENT RESIGNATION AND RECRUITMENT 6. LA21-000036 – AZIZ SIDDIQUI O/B/O DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES AND UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS, OUTLOT A, STONEBAY – ORONO CROSSINGS FINAL PLAT – RESOLUTION NO. 7206 7. LA21-000040 – TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DOCK LICENSES AND BIG ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 259, THIRD SERIES Crosby moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. A member of the public asked to take item 7 off the Consent Agenda. Mayor Walsh noted they will take item 7 off. Motion seconded by Printup. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 5 8. LA21-000042 – MOHEGAN HANSEN ARCH O/B/O CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC, 2060 WAYZATA BLVD WEST, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, ZONE CHANGE, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT – RESOLUTION Mayor Walsh said he and Barnhart have talked to the Applicant and discussed whether the height is pre- construction height or pre-development height; he clarified because there was a development there previously which never happened, they received approvals. Then everything was graded differently after the approvals and as Mayor Walsh understands it, the developer wants to go back to what all of the old heights were based on rather than the new grading as it changes things by about 6 feet. The Applicant stated they are trying to adjust their main floor level to meet ceiling heights and by today’s development standards if they were to use the original grades which were never fully finished – they have hauled all the dirt off-site – and the back of the building was cut 14 feet or better. He said they are planning on filling it in so it is not a walkout. They would like to use somewhere between the pre- development elevation which he does not think is unreasonable. Barnhart shared in looking at a proposed building, they spend a lot of time looking at the defined height of the building. He clarified there are a lot of structures in Orono that are higher than 30 feet but based on the City’s definition of height are right at 30 feet or less. On attached family projects height is a critical issue, he noted the apartment building across the street and the senior housing project Stone Bay, and said the City is always bumping up against 30 feet. What the City uses to define the height of a building is to look at the existing grade before doing any work and use that grade to help establish where the house “box” can fit. He said in the past the concern was people elevating their house pad and sticking a house on top of it so they get a prominent view of the lake over the treetops. Over the years the City Council has established a definition or mechanism for figuring out height using the existing grades. In this situation the property was developed in 2006 for office condominiums/townhomes; what was a hill before was cut and created walkout lots. He clarified the Applicant would set the building into the “hill” that is no longer there. Mayor Walsh clarified the way City Code works is they must use the number of what was dug out rather than using what used to be the hill, even though that is how everything was approved back then. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to accept the Staff recommendations amending Part F, height no higher than 30 feet above the highest adjacent grade of 1022 with the clarifying comment that the City does not go back two developments to find different grades. Barnhart would like to come back with a resolution to get the City Council’s final approval. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 7. LA21-000040 – TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DOCK LICENSES AND BIG ISLAND Mayor Walsh stated this has come before the Council about 3 different times and the last time they were just looking at clarifying the final language for the resolution. Jeffrey Hornig, 450 Big Island, bought the property one year ago and they are very happy with the purchase. Mr. Hornig noted this just came to their attention and some pointed out it may be helpful for the City Council to have a perspective of something they may not have seen or heard yet. Mr. Hornig is MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 5 7. LA21-000040 – TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO DOCK LICENSES AND BIG ISLAND – Continued not opposed to this, he believes strongly in government, and has three points to share. First, safety and access; his understanding when he bought it is the road next to his property and he was told his property is the lowest one so that would be the side that emergency vehicles would use. By putting a dock there in the summer, he assumes it would be hard to have access. He noted there were five power outages from August to September. Mayor Walsh noted the property owner’s land on screen as B1-6 and clarified the City Council is looking at B1-4 right now. He stated if they ever did something at B1-6, everyone around it would get notices and that would be the time to come talk about it. They are working on a case-by-case basis and this ordinance is really about the process which was instituted by B1-4. Mr. Hornig also noted the cost of a dock on the lake and when he saw $800 for a permit, he thinks the City is grossly undercharging. He pays $7,000 in Excelsior for a modest spot. Mayor Walsh clarified in Excelsior that is a for-profit business and the City is not a for-profit business so all fees run to what the cost is to do something in general rather than a money-making operation. It is a break-even operation as they do not want government in the for-profit business because they don’t do a good job at that. Mr. Hornig stated there are a lot of snakes on the property and he had a landscaper come out who noted one of the snake nests is down by the space. His understanding is they cannot move snake nests so it is something to start thinking about before digging and disrupting a snake pit. Crosby asked how long it takes Xcel Energy to get out there if a tree goes down and power goes out. Mr. Hornig said it does not take too long, after a big storm they were out within a couple of hours. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to approve LA21-000040 – Text Amendment Related To Dock Licenses and Big Island - Ordinance 259, Third Series. VOTE: Aye 4, Nays 0. Barnhart suggests a $500 per year fee and asked if that is acceptable to the Council as the fee was not in the ordinance. Mayor Walsh clarified the previous motion would also approve the $500 license fee. He asked if the motion was amended and accepted. Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to amend the motion to approve the $500 license fee. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 5 9. WATER CONSERVATION DURING DROUGHT Edwards noted many cities in the area received notification from the DNR that the State is now in a drought warning phase which requires certain actions from municipalities, one of which is to enact a portion of the City’s water emergency plan per the water supply plan. Edwards has provided some information in the packet. Tonight, he is looking for approval or guidance on what portions of the water emergency supply plan the City Council would like to do. Edwards’ recommendation is to go with an informational effort with voluntary actions at this point because currently Orono is not suffering from water shortages within their municipal system. Some surrounding neighbors are but right now the infrastructure pumps and towers in Orono are able to keep up with the heightened demand. However, it is probably a good time to remind people of good irrigation practices. He noted they are also getting many phone calls from residents about how high their watering bills are. Edwards said part of it is the City can look at numbers for the meter reads and the amount of water going on to some of these properties which is excessive. Walsh previously spoke with Edwards and asked the rationale for doing a water ban. He noted 1/3 of Orono is on City water and 2/3 are on wells so there is not a huge demand on the infrastructure from that standpoint, there is nothing that says their aquifers are low. His recommendation is that the City start with information to the public until such time as they need to go to a watering ban. The Council discussed informing the public on the best times to water and ways to cut back on watering. Edwards noted the City has also significantly cut back watering at the municipal golf course, Bederwood Field, and City Hall. Mayor Walsh suggested in the Resolution under “Now Therefore, Be it Resolved” adding the word “voluntary” after abide, and under item e, adding the word “voluntary” restrictions shall remain in place until September 30th, because the Council can remove or amend this if they move from voluntary to mandatory. Walsh moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the Resolution No. 7208 as amended to include the word “voluntary” in the two places mentioned. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Edwards updated the Council and noted personnel is consuming the City Staff right now; he thanked the Council for approving the Accountant tonight and noted they are in second round interviews for the Maintenance Worker position. He noted another Staff member tested positive for Covid-19 and is currently in the recovery period. Edwards noted Olson is running utility billing, doing the budget process, and trying to hire vacancies. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Barnhart noted they are doing public outreach as part of the Navarre parking lot plan in August. There is a virtual question and answer period on August 12 and a public meeting on August 17. They will send out postcards to directly adjacent businesses and posting it on Facebook and the website. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 5 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Crosby would like to start highlighting local businesses in the area to give them some free press. The first one is a new addition who opened up a store in the Navarre area called Pfeffer’s Meats. They purchased some steaks for the 4th of July and everyone at the store was fantastic and smiling and the food is incredible. It is the perfect addition to the community. Crosby also brought up some robberies happening in the area and reminded the public to look out for their neighbors, make sure their doors are locked, not leave valuables in the car, and if someone sees something suspicious to call 911 without hesitation. Seals emailed Edwards about potentially doing an outreach regarding misinformation about Lowry Woods; she thinks it would be a good idea to approach it by sending out the facts that there are no trees being cut down, a bike club wants to use it and has the right to ask; she noted they are just having conversations right now and there are no behind-closed-doors meetings. Mayor Walsh said condolences go out to the families of Sam Schuneman of Maple Grove and Matt Motzko from Deephaven who passed away recently in a car accident. ADJOURNMENT Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 6:47 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: _____________________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Council Work Session Monday, July 26, 2021 5:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Victoria Seals, Aaron Printup, and Richard F. Crosby II. Staff members present were City Administrator/Engineer/Public Works Director Adam Edwards, Finance Director Ron Olson, Public Works Superintendent DJ Goman, and City Clerk Anna Carlson. Meeting started: 5:00 p.m. 1. Budget Discussion Finance Director Ron Olson presented the budget workbook to the City Council. He highlighted each category’s funds and explained the main proposed expenditures. He noted the Fire Department will present their budget mid-August and that he did not see anything out of the ordinary expected. Olson also explained how that increased revenues may offset some of the increased expenditures. Mayor Dennis Walsh asked Olson to further review the revenues from permit fees at the next work session. He added that he would like to revisit the Golf Course, equipment, and more at that meeting as well. Olson noted that Revenues will be further discussed and reviewed at the August 9th Work Session. Adjourned: 5:43 p.m. CITY OF ORONO: ATTEST: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor _________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, May 10, 2021 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. Page 2 of 2 Adjourned: 5:35 p.m. CITY OF ORONO: ATTEST: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor _________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: RJO Reviewed By: Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 116861 to 116935, totaling $356,000.00. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #116873 Blackstone Contractors $84,782.75 The 4th payment for the Big Island project. #116879 Carman Bay Lake Improvement District $17,093.12 Payment to the district for the amount of their levy that was collected with the first half tax settlement. #116916 Orono Woods Apartments LLC $38,464.38 Payment of the 1st half TIF funds collected with the first half tax settlement. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Item No.: 3 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 45 07/29/2021 116861 072920021 101-21705 457 - 07/26/2021 1,691.00 Total 116861:1,691.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT-HCSP-07/29/2021 116862 07292021 101-21718 PEHSCP - 7/29/2021 2,229.50 Total 116862:2,229.50 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 07/29/2021 116863 07292021OB 101-21705 OBRA - 7/29/2021 649.42 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 07/29/2021 116863 07292021RO 101-21705 ROTH - 07/29/2021 175.00 Total 116863:824.42 ORCHARD TRUST-MNDCP-ING 07/29/2021 116864 07292021 101-21705 457 - 07/29/2021 1,770.00 Total 116864:1,770.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREM 07/29/2021 116865 07292021 101-21704 PERA 0712/21-07/25/21 39,113.14 Total 116865:39,113.14 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 08/05/2021 116866 07012021OB 101-21705 OBRA - 7/1/2021 565.45 Total 116866:565.45 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 08/05/2021 116867 07292021US 101-21705 457 - 07/29/2021 930.00 Total 116867:930.00 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 08/05/2021 116868 449228147 710-49970-413 PW COPIER LEASE 06/20/21-07/20/21 126.76 Total 116868:126.76 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS AS 08/05/2021 116869 828190 651-49910-433 APWA MEMBERSHIP Storm Water 225.00 Total 116869:225.00 Aspen Mills 08/05/2021 116870 277628 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 33.61 Aspen Mills 08/05/2021 116870 277691 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 1,169.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116870:1,202.61 Batteries + Bulbs 08/05/2021 116871 P42247449 602-49450-227 LS#9 BATTERY Sewer 50.38 Total 116871:50.38 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819261 101-45200-415 BEDERWOOD PARK Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819262 101-45200-415 SUMMIT BEACH Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819263 101-45200-415 HACKBERRY PARK Parks 170.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819264 101-45210-415 ORONO GOLF COURSE Golf Course 85.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819265 101-45200-415 CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGROUND Parks 85.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819266 101-45200-415 NAVARRE PLAYGROUND Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819267 101-45200-415 FRENCH CREEK PRESERVE Parks 85.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819268 101-45200-415 LURTON PARK Parks 85.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819269 101-45200-415 BRUSH SITE Parks 85.00 BIFFS INC 08/05/2021 116872 W819270 101-45200-415 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Parks 85.00 Total 116872:1,160.00 Blackstone Contractors LLC 08/05/2021 116873 RFP #4 225-16500 BIG ISLAND PROJECT 19-033 89,245.00 Blackstone Contractors LLC 08/05/2021 116873 RFP #4 225-20600 BIG ISLAND PROJECT 19-033 4,462.25- Total 116873:84,782.75 Boyer Building Corporation 08/05/2021 116874 08052021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND RPS20-000146 1495 GREEN 1,000.00 Total 116874:1,000.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 217-0201G 1 101-41600-307 MISC RECORDINGS 06/21 Law/Legal Services 302.95 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 217-0739G 2 101-43280-307 LA21-000026 1395 ORONO LANE Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0004G 101-42110-307 POLICE MATTERS 06/21 Police Department 297.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0741G 101-43280-307 LA21-000031 - 724 TONKAWA Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0742G 101-43280-307 LA21-000033 - 1579 MAPLE PLACE Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0743G 101-43280-307 LA21-000030 - 1509 LONG LAKE ROAD Special Services 220.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0744G 101-43280-307 LA21-000032 - 165 BEDERWOOD Special Services 220.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0745G 101-43280-307 LA21-000034 - 3423 SHORELINE Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0746G 101-43280-307 LA21-000035 2160 WAYZATA BLVD Special Services 82.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0800G 101-42400-307 STAFF MEETINGS 06/21 Building & Zoning 297.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0801G 101-41600-307 COUNCIL MEETINGS 06/21 Law/Legal Services 858.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0802G 101-42400-307 B&Z ASSISTANCE 06/21 Building & Zoning 3,478.31 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/05/2021 116875 2717-0803G 101-41600-308 ORDINANCES 6/21 Law/Legal Services 577.50 Total 116875:6,663.26 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P 08/05/2021 116876 2573263 (2)101-45210-091 BEER FOR RESALE Golf Course 210.50 Total 116876:210.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 AE - 7/30/21 101-45200-223 PARK BENCH FOR SUMMIT BEACH Parks 316.45 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 CF 07/21/21 101-42110-439 POLICE COMMIISSION ITEMS Police Department 19.25 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 JB 101-45210-201 ICE PACKS Golf Course 38.68 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 JB 07/23/21 101-45210-092 BOTTLED WATER Golf Course 26.45 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 JE 7/16/21 B 101-45210-489 STAFF APPRECIATION Golf Course 281.72 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 SO 07/28/21 101-43000-240 SHOP TOOLS Public Works Department 726.49 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 08/05/2021 116877 TS 072721 L 101-42110-439 MEETING EXPENSE Police Department 65.18 Total 116877:1,474.22 CARGILL SALT 08/05/2021 116878 2906395547 101-43000-224 TREATED ROAD SALT Public Works Department 4,379.09 CARGILL SALT 08/05/2021 116878 2906403831 601-49400-216 NAV WTR PLANT SALT Water 5,441.48 Total 116878:9,820.57 Carmen Bay Lake Improvement D 08/05/2021 116879 1st half 2021 239-25694-489 1ST HALF CBLID PAYMENT 17,093.12 Total 116879:17,093.12 CCP INDUSTRIES INC.08/05/2021 116880 IN02810045 101-43000-226 TRAFFIC VESTS Public Works Department 66.34 Total 116880:66.34 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 08/05/2021 116881 11130023-2 101-45210-381 GAS SERVICE 6/21/21-7/21/21 Golf Course 19.96 Total 116881:19.96 Century Link 08/05/2021 116882 7/19/21 101-45210-321 GC PHONE/INTERNET 7/19/2021 Golf Course 240.37 Total 116882:240.37 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017361 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 1,538.34 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017366 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 68.93 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017372 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 82.82 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017376 101-42110-402 #247 SERVICE Police Department 224.49 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017377 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 89.46 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08/05/2021 116883 0017417 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 48.35 Total 116883:2,052.39 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 08/05/2021 116884 19405 601-49400-489 BACTERIAL WATER TESTING Water 31.50 Total 116884:31.50 CIVIC SYSTEMS LLC 08/05/2021 116885 214253 614-49840-329 CITY WEBSITE ANNUAL FEE Cable Franchise 5,482.22 Total 116885:5,482.22 CMI INC 08/05/2021 116886 8043050 101-42110-240 MOUTHPIECES Police Department 211.95 Total 116886:211.95 CORE & MAIN 08/05/2021 116887 P169717 601-49400-227 GATE VALVE SUPPLIES Water 918.70 Total 116887:918.70 David Wiemer 08/05/2021 116888 08052021-1 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA21-000016 1405 REST POI 700.00 Total 116888:700.00 DELTA DENTAL 08/05/2021 116889 CNS0000741 101-21709 4842130001 AUG 2021 3,242.08 DELTA DENTAL 08/05/2021 116889 CNS0000741 101-15998 4842130001 AUG 2021 134.64 Total 116889:3,376.72 DITTER INC.08/05/2021 116890 19494 101-42110-404 BUILDING MAINTENANCE Police Department 1,429.20 Total 116890:1,429.20 DUPONT CONSTRUCTION & RE 08/05/2021 116891 08032021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA21-000033 & RAS00767 15 1,700.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116891:1,700.00 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 08/05/2021 116892 0126234-IN 2 101-45200-223 BAL DUE - ADOPT A PARK SIGNS Parks 18.95 Total 116892:18.95 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 08/05/2021 116893 845804 601-16500 21-039 NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY UTILITY B 70.98 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 08/05/2021 116893 845804 602-16500 21-039 NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY UTILITY B 70.98 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 08/05/2021 116893 845968 101-41300-340 PARK-GC SUPER ADVERTISEMENT Administration 192.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 08/05/2021 116893 846860 101-42400-340 AUGUST PH Building & Zoning 53.64 Total 116893:387.60 EOF Investments LLC 08/05/2021 116894 07232021-1 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND 14-3647 1444 SHORELINE DR 2,500.00 Total 116894:2,500.00 GOPHER ACE 08/05/2021 116895 7011 601-49400-405 1880 SHADYWOOD RD WATER VALVE Water 27.99 GOPHER ACE 08/05/2021 116895 7136/1 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 14.99 GOPHER ACE 08/05/2021 116895 7233/1 101-42110-240 MISC SUPPLIES Police Department 8.99 GOPHER ACE 08/05/2021 116895 7341/1 101-42110-240 MISC SUPPLIES Police Department 6.99 GOPHER ACE 08/05/2021 116895 7355/1 101-42110-240 MISC SUPPLIES Police Department 49.33 Total 116895:108.29 GRAINGER INC 08/05/2021 116896 9004258423 701-49800-221 AIR HOSE REEL - 490 AIR COMPRESSOR 351.91 Total 116896:351.91 Gregory O'Connor 08/05/2021 116897 07232021-2 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND 2013-01285 410 BIG ISLAND 2,000.00 Total 116897:2,000.00 HAWKINS INC 08/05/2021 116898 4978564 601-49400-216 CHEMICALS Water 653.45 Total 116898:653.45 Lecy Bros Homes & Remodeling 08/05/2021 116899 08042021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND RPS21-000034 1,000.00 Lecy Bros Homes & Remodeling 08/05/2021 116899 08042021-1 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND RPS20-000092 1090 HERITAG 1,000.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116899:2,000.00 Linda Shaw 08/05/2021 116900 07232021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND 2014-01137 2290 ABINGDON 700.00 Total 116900:700.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50703 101-42110-310 POLICE RECORDS 08/21 Police Department 7,520.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50703 710-49970-311 HOSTED BACKUP 8/21 908.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50703 710-49970-311 HOSTED COMPLIANCE ARCHIVE 08/21 501.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50703 710-49970-311 HOSTED SERVERS 08/21 1,291.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50703 710-49970-329 INTERNET 08/21 555.00 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 50790 710-49970-401 SOFT TOKENS 458.15 LOGIS 08/05/2021 116901 80772 710-49970-401 NETWORK MAINT 1,031.25 Total 116901:12,264.40 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 08/05/2021 116902 22485715 101-42110-212 UNLEADED FUEL Police Department 3,494.63 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 08/05/2021 116902 22502162 101-42110-212 UNLEADED FUEL Police Department 1,144.81 Total 116902:4,639.44 MIKE & MELISSA SHIELDS 08/05/2021 116903 08042021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND TR18-000002 - 669 MTKA HIG 1,000.00 Total 116903:1,000.00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 08/05/2021 116904 00079711 101-42110-221 OXYGEN Police Department 78.90 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 08/05/2021 116904 00079712 101-42110-221 OXYGEN Police Department 12.68 Total 116904:91.58 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-34210 SALES TAX 6/2021 1.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 601-39610 SALES TAX 6/2021 65.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 601-20806 SALES TAX 6/2021 1,297.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37910 SALES TAX 6/2021 3,765.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37920 SALES TAX 6/2021 1,566.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37930 SALES TAX 6/2021 358.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37940 SALES TAX 6/2021 128.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37960 SALES TAX 6/2021 62.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37970 SALES TAX 6/2021 5.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount MN DEPT OF REVENUE-WIRE 08/05/2021 116905 June 2021 101-37980 SALES TAX 6/2021 23.00 Total 116905:7,270.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Clark - Water 601-49400-437 MRWA CONFERENCE 2021 BRIAN Water 250.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Goman 2021 601-49400-437 MRWA EXPO 2021 Water 150.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Maurer - Wat 601-49400-437 MRWA CONFERENCE 2021 BRANDON Water 250.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Mielke - Wate 601-49400-437 MRWA CONFERENCE Water 250.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Milke R - Wat 601-49400-437 MRWA CONFERENCE RICK Water 250.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Oberainger 2 601-49400-437 MRWA EXPO 2021 SCOTT Water 150.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Rathbun 202 601-49400-437 MRWA EXPO 2021 Water 150.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI 08/05/2021 116906 Schumann 2 601-49400-437 MRWA EXPO 2021 Water 150.00 Total 116906:1,600.00 Morrie's Auto Body & Glass 08/05/2021 116907 T0582902 101-42110-550 SQUAD TEARDOWN Police Department 378.00 Total 116907:378.00 MOUND TRUE VALUE 08/05/2021 116908 176229 101-42110-402 SQUAD SUPPLIES Police Department 108.97 MOUND TRUE VALUE 08/05/2021 116908 176419 101-42110-240 MISC SUPPLIES Police Department 12.98 Total 116908:121.95 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 08/05/2021 116909 1316969-00 101-45210-404 IRRIGATION REPAIR Golf Course 390.00 Total 116909:390.00 NAVARRE HARDWARE 08/05/2021 116910 331916 601-49400-489 S WTR PLANT SUPPLIES Water 34.46 NAVARRE HARDWARE 08/05/2021 116910 332479 601-49400-240 GRINDER BLADES Water 9.99 Total 116910:44.45 Newegg Business Inc 08/05/2021 116911 1303385308 710-49970-221 PRINTER - SQUAD 339.33 Newegg Business Inc 08/05/2021 116911 1303393560 710-49970-575 DESKTOP PC 435.00 Newegg Business Inc 08/05/2021 116911 1303396493 710-49970-221 CAR CHARGER 38.23 Total 116911:812.56 NORLINGS 08/05/2021 116912 38941 101-45200-404 CITY HALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Parks 820.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount NORLINGS 08/05/2021 116912 38943 101-45200-404 CRYSTAL BAY PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC Parks 381.25 Total 116912:1,201.25 Northland Petroleum Service 08/05/2021 116913 23250 701-49800-403 FUEL PUMP LEAK REPAIR 2,013.08 Total 116913:2,013.08 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1817390700 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 73.48 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1826691450 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 5.67 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1828079890 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 51.53 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1828105420 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 23.89 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1828105430 101-41900-201 FLASH DRIVES Central Services 81.18 OFFICE DEPOT 08/05/2021 116914 1839554910 101-42110-201 OFFICE SUPPLIES Police Department 44.78- Total 116914:190.97 OPTUM 08/05/2021 116915 9414093 101-41900-319 HSA MAINTENANCE FEE 2ND QTR 2021 Central Services 222.25 Total 116915:222.25 Orono Woods Apartments LLC 08/05/2021 116916 1st Half 2021 235-45690-489 TIF PAYMENT 1ST HALF 2021 38,464.38 Total 116916:38,464.38 RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 08/05/2021 116917 July 2021 101-41900-404 GARBAGE SERVICE - 07/2021 Central Services 501.36 RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 08/05/2021 116917 July 2021 101-41900-489 GARBAGE SERVICE - 07/2021 Central Services 19.03 RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 08/05/2021 116917 July 2021 101-45200-404 GARBAGE SERVICE - 07/2021 Parks 643.34 RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 08/05/2021 116917 July 2021 101-45210-404 GARBAGE SERVICE - 07/2021 Golf Course 124.34 Total 116917:1,288.07 Riverside Design 08/05/2021 116918 2638 101-42110-352 PRINTING Police Department 278.32 Total 116918:278.32 Robert & Beth Bjork 08/05/2021 116919 07232021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND 2014+-01400 965 EDGWOOD 700.00 Total 116919:700.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Schneider Excavating and Gradin 08/05/2021 116920 RFP #2 601-20600 WALTERS PORT MAIN IMPROVEMENT 21-022 3,359.72- Schneider Excavating and Gradin 08/05/2021 116920 RFP #2 602-16500 WALTERS PORT MAIN IMPROVEMENT 21-022 67,194.24 Total 116920:63,834.52 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 08/05/2021 116921 426 (2)601-49400-201 INDICIA WINDOW ENVELOPES Water 326.00 SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 08/05/2021 116921 426 (2)602-49450-201 INDICIA WINDOW ENVELOPES Sewer 326.00 Total 116921:652.00 SECURITY & SOUND CO 08/05/2021 116922 24077 101-41900-404 PANIC BUTTONS Central Services 1,220.00 Total 116922:1,220.00 SmartPassion LLC c/o Hach Co.08/05/2021 116923 1468636 601-49400-216 WATER, DEIONIZED & REAGENT SOLUTION Water 870.97 Total 116923:870.97 SRIXON SPORTS USA INC 08/05/2021 116924 6510191 101-45210-095 GOLF BALLS Golf Course 210.00 Total 116924:210.00 St. Cyr Johnson Enterprises 08/05/2021 116925 35371-1-357 101-42110-226 COVID UNIFORMS Police Department 400.52 St. Cyr Johnson Enterprises 08/05/2021 116925 35612-1-357 101-42110-226 COVID UNIFORMS Police Department 105.63 Total 116925:506.15 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 08/05/2021 116926 July 2021 101-41600-306 PROSECUTION SERVICES-07/2021 Law/Legal Services 2,963.26 Total 116926:2,963.26 THE HOME DEPOT 08/05/2021 116927 07/07/21 101-45200-223 BIG ISLAND WEED CONTROL Parks 68.73 THE HOME DEPOT 08/05/2021 116927 SO 07/14/21 101-41900-223 SHOP SUPPLIES Central Services 270.21 Total 116927:338.94 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 08/05/2021 116928 M26617 101-41300-319 CC MEETING MINUTES Administration 302.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 08/05/2021 116928 M26617 101-42400-319 PC MINUTES Building & Zoning 372.38 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116928:674.38 UNIFIRST CO 08/05/2021 116929 0639144 101-45210-223 RUGS / TOWELS GC Golf Course 39.30 UNIFIRST CO 08/05/2021 116929 090 0637718 101-41900-223 MATS - CH & CC Central Services 58.00 Total 116929:97.30 US Bank Equipment Finance 08/05/2021 116930 449252063 710-49970-413 COPIERS 656.44 Total 116930:656.44 VALLEY RICH CO 08/05/2021 116931 29689 601-49400-405 WATERMAIN BREAK 19 & KELLY Water 10,567.71 Total 116931:10,567.71 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-42110-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Police Department 1,852.71 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-41900-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Central Services 208.63 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-42400-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Building & Zoning 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-43000-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Public Works Department 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-45200-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Parks 80.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-45210-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Golf Course 115.04 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 101-43100-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Brush Site 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 601-49400-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Water 165.82 VERIZON WIRELESS 08/05/2021 116932 9883484780 602-49450-321 VERIZON BILL 7-06-21 Sewer 165.82 Total 116932:2,693.08 WILLIAMS TOWING 08/05/2021 116933 156092 101-42110-436 TOWING FEES INVESTIGATIVE Police Department 605.00 Total 116933:605.00 Win911 08/05/2021 116934 239XT171-20 602-49450-416 WIN 911 RENEWAL Sewer 660.00 Total 116934:660.00 Yamaha Golf & Utility 08/05/2021 116935 01-242277 101-45210-403 GOLF CART REPAIR Golf Course 597.98 Total 116935:597.98 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 7/27/2021 - 8/9/2021 Aug 05, 2021 12:10PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Grand Totals: 356,000.66 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: Purpose. The Park Gun Club has applied for their annual gun club license effective September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2022. The applicant has submitted the required licensing information and Staff recommends approval as no complaints have been received in the past year. A calendar of events for the 2021-22 license is attached. The Orono Police Department has completed a background check and all required documents have been submitted. Staff recommends approval of the application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Annual Gun Club Permit. Exhibits Exhibit A. Park Gun Club Calendar of Events 2021-22 Item No.: 4 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Annual Gun Club Permit Presenter: Anna Carlson City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the Rental License for the license period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. 2. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the rental license listed in Exhibit A for the license period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. The Rental License Applicant in Exhibit A has submitted all of the requested documents and has met all requirements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the rental license listed in Exhibit A for the license period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Exhibits A. Listing of Rental License Item No.: 5 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Approval of Rental License Presenter: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A City Council 2021 Rental License Renewals RL21-000012 Troy Patrin 100 License# Licensee Total License Fees AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to award the contract for the construction of sewer and water connections to the future public works facility site. 2. Background. In 2020 the City Council expressed an interest in procuring land and constructing a new public works facility. The City acquired the parcel at 365 OCB earlier this year. On March 8th, 2021 the council approved the engineer and design proposal for the utility extensions. The project has been designed, permits from the railroad and MnDOT received, and bids solicited. 3. Project Scope. The scope of the project will be to construct water and sanitary sewer lines to service the property at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road. Pipes will run from the existing mains to the north of Hwy 12 under the highway and railroad to the parcel. 4. Cost. The city received five bids. The bid summary is at Exhibit A. The lowest bid was from Pember Companies for $181,155.00. In addition to the construction cost, Bolton and Menk provided a proposal of NTE $ 22,000 for construction oversight. Who Work Cost Status Bolton &Menk Design and Bid Engineering $ 28,736.00 Previously approved Not to exceed Pember Companies Construction $181,155.00 Pending award Bolton &Menk Construction Oversight $22,000 Not to exceed TOTAL $231,891.00 5. Funding. Funding for the project would come from facility fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to award the new public works facility sewer and water utilities project to Pember Companies for $181,155.00 and to authorize Bolton & Menk to perform construction oversite for a fee not to exceed $22,000.00. Exhibits A. Bid Summary B. Fee Proposal from Bolton and Menk Item No.: 6 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Public Works Facility Utility Award Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E City Administrator/ City Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A Bid Summary Company Bid Amount Pember Company $ 181,155.00 GM Contracting $ 233,601.53 GF Jedlicki $ 237,210.10 Kuechle Underground Inc. $ 286,000.00 TE Underground LLC $ 299,835.02 Document1 August 4, 2021 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Public Works Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension Dear Mr. Edwards: As requested, we have prepared a scope of services and estimated fee for the construction services associated with the Public Works Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension project. Scope of Services Construction Staking and Observation Construction staking will be provided along with 75% construction observation. Duties of the Construction Observer will include the following: • Attendance at the pre-construction meeting and all construction-related meetings • Serve as a liaison between the City and the contractor • Review of the completed work to determine if the project is in general conformance with the plans and specifications • Review of all materials testing • Maintenance of construction documentation • Communication with affected property owners, as necessary, to address their construction-related concerns and issues Construction Administration Construction administration duties will include the following: • Administering a pre-construction meeting • Review of shop drawings • Preparation of pay estimates • Contractor Communications • Liaison with City Staff and Council Record drawings detailing the completed improvements as recorded by the construction observer and the City of Orono’s contractor will be completed and furnished to the City in hard copy and electronic format. Record plans will also be linked to the City mapping system and the City’s GIS system will be updated. Public Works Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension Page 2 Document1 Fee Estimate Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a not-to-exceed of $22,000 to be billed on an hourly basis. A separate proposal (if necessary) for materials testing services will be submitted to the City for Review. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Principal Engineer AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: D.J.G Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the agenda item is to gain Council approval to appoint a new Maintenance Worker within Public Works. 2. Background. The Public Works Department currently has six full time maintenance worker positions. The maintenance worker positions are critical to meet current service needs and are essential to City operations. One position is currently being added as part of the Spring Park contract requirements. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the position has been completed. The process involved application screening, an interview panel, practical exercise testing and background checking. 4. Recommended Candidate. The top candidate is Mr. Brody Pool. Brody has 15 years of private utility and construction contractor experience. 5. Recommended Compensation. I recommended that Mr. Pool be appointed to the position of Public Works Maintenance Worker effective August 10th, 2021. a. Salary. Starting salary of $26.84/hr. (Grade 7, Step 2) b. Vacation. Starting vacation to be earned at a rate or 10 days (80 hours) per year. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint Mr. Brody Pool as a Public Works Maintenance Worker. Item No.: 7 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Public Works Maintenance Worker Appointment Presenter: D.J. Goman Superintendent of Public Works Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: DJG Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to purchase Ford F350 Pickup truck and related components. 2. Background. The City of Orono will be supplying public work support and services to the City of Spring Park beginning September 1, 2021. The contract included language showing the need to purchase additional equipment to help supplement the overall public works operation. The truck is the same as ones purchased back in 2018. 3. Cost. The City received quotes for pickup and components, listed below. The pricing is part of State of Minnesota contract pricing. Company Company / Model Cost Waconia Ford F350 Pick up 4WD $32,414.00 + Tax, Lic. Aspen Equipment Tommy gate, Storage box, Snow plow $13,631.00 Total: $ 46,045.00 4. Funding. This vehicle will be funded through the Equipment Fund. 5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval of the purchase. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve Purchase Ford F350 from Waconia Ford and components from Aspen Equipment. Item No.: 8 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: Approval to Purchase Pickup Truck and Components Presenter: DJ Goman Public Works Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council authorization for Pay Request No. 4 – Final for the East Long Lake Trail Project. 2. Background. On July 13th, 2020 the City awarded the East Long Lake Trail Project contract to Blackstone Construction. Construction was completed in 2020 with site restoration completed in 2021. 3. Project Scope. The project consisted of removal of the existing asphalt, construction of a 10ft wide multipurpose trail, boardwalk, overlook point, and interpretive signage. 4. Cost. Pay request No. 4 is for $5,635.63. This included payment of the retainage. Total payments to Blackstone Construction including Pay request 4 is $ 281,688.44. 5. Funding. This project is funded from the Park Fund and a $150,000 grant from the DNR. 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that Blackstone Construction be paid $5,635.63 and the project be closed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve Pay Request No. 4-Final to Blackstone Construction in the amount of $5,635.63 for the East Long Lake Trail Project. Exhibits A. Pay Request Item No.: 9 Date: August 9, 2020 Item Description: East Long Lake Trail Project (20-029) - Pay Request No. 4 – Final Presenter: Adam T. Edwards City Administrator/City Engineer Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Exhibit A AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding an average lakeshore setback variance for a small deck expansion. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on May 21, 2021. The 60-Day review period has been extended and now expires on September 21, 2021. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant requested an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck (shown in yellow on Exhibit B). A small 2-3 foot portion of the existing deck currently encroaches into the average lakeshore setback. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On July 19th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variance as proposed. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the neighbors were received, the neighbors on either side of the property signed the application acknowledgement form. 6. Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance, subject to the site’s hardcover not increasing above the 25% maximum. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Plans C. Draft PC Minutes D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 97/19/2021 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan D. Proposed Plans and Elevations E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. Aerial Photos G. Property Owners List & Neighbor Acknowledgment H. Plat Map I. 60-day extension Item No.: 10 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000045 – Revision LLC, 4535 North Shore Drive, Variance – Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA21 -000045 WHEREAS, on May 21, 2021, Revision LLC, (hereinafter the “Applicant”) on behalf of the property owners Roger S. Haydock and Elanie M. Haydock (hereinafter the “Owners”), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 4535 North Shore Drive and legally described as: Lot 8, Bergquists Addition to Saga Hill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 2 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000045. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.54 acres in area and has a defined lot width of approximately 65 feet at the OHWL and approximately 75 feet at the 75-foot setback. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The requested average lakeshore setback variance is in harmony with the Ordinance as the adjacent neighbors have been notified and have not indicated their views of the lake will be impacted by the improvements, and hardcover will be conforming. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The deck project in the residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 3 a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit portions of a deck lakeward of the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable; the linear shoreline and location of the neighboring homes result in the existing non-conforming condition. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The location of the neighboring homes, the setback of the existing home from the lake, and the orientation of the shoreline are conditions not created by the landowner; c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to permit an extension of the deck on the lakeside of the home will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners or alter the character of the locality. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a deck is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The location of the existing improvements/ home and the location of the neighboring homes generally in line with the Owners’ home along the shoreline are conditions unique to this Property. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 4 9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The location of the existing improvements/ home, and the location of the neighboring homes along the shoreline are unique conditions affecting the Property. 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” The Applicant has indicated the variance is necessary. 11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The application of the average lakeshore setback on the Property severely limits the options for expanding and/or improving the home on the lake side; the granting of the requested variance is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty resulting from the location of the existing home in relation to the neighboring homes. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 12/03/2020 and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (August 9, 2022). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 5 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of August, 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor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verage Lakeshore Setback Line ! " # $ % $ & ! ' # $ ( $ ) * + % , - # . ! ( % $ ! ' $ ) % ! ' / * 0 1 2 3 , 1 4 . © NORTH SHOR£ DRIVE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ s 84050' 38" w 83 °03' 18"£99. 74 ()1 a.a D/\;i _ \:P· \ \ /' Qg;i�t \ 'l- () / ��\,\, \ Ji/ 0 Of \/ ,: \ s;;\�'?\, \ cf:>s '},./\ \� Is:> c.,.J I \.,/·· .,,.� EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING HOUSE .,/---···tJ (:I� I . -'v�-...v ��----�-� � J ,,v?\01.-·, ... ··· g<:i"· �<��i HARDCOVER .. ,,,--EXISTING �x:5···· ,C)'-l ��-·-· �--a HOUSE =3110 SF FPORCH =200 SF FWALK =100 SF DRIVE =1725 SF PATIO = 510 SF WALKS =160 SF l \ \ .... ,,,.,,_ .. ,::!.:::I:Y.. ,. {l) .._ l\½:'.¼/l_'o·: .. _I ,.:.:.,:.· .... , ..... , ...... ., .............................. ·•·•·--"···· ..... ,. . -�··· TOT AL =5805 SF /24.6% \ \ 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET i-,fll·J' = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. X{998.0)= PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION .,.· = DIRECTION SURF ACE DRAINAGE = CANTILEVERED OVERHANG = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE = GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION \ COH OHL GFE TFE LFE = TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION = LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION DESCRIPTION: \ \ \ LOT 8, BERGQUISTS ADDITION TO SAGA HILL, HENN. CO., MN. ADDRESS 4535 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO, MN PID#07-117-23-31-0007 \ \ LOT AREA = 23560 SF/ 0.54 AC X 25% =5840 SF \ \ LAKE PROJECT NO. BOOK BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY DArE PAGE DEC3, 2020 REVISION MN REVISIONS tor I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND HAYDOCK RESIDENCE THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. FRANK R. CARDARELLE REG. NO. 6508 4535 NORTH SHORE DR PROPOSED DECK =47 SF/ 0.2% TOTAL EXISTING TO REMAIN AND PROPOSED = 5852 SF /24.85% � Land Fra.nk R. Carda.relle Surveyor 6440 FL YING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 952-941-3031 DN 3 ' 1 0 ' 12'-8" 3 '-1 1 3 /1 6 " 2 ' - 1 0 5 / 1 6 " 8'-6 13/16" 1 9 '-1 1 3 /1 6 " 8 ' 6'-0 9/16" DECK New dropped beam, sister new canted joists alongside ex'g & back to ledger, add new hangers. Add 5/4" x 3-1/2" IPE blind fastened to match ex'g decking. Extended Deck 1/8" - 1'-0" H A Y D O C K R E S I D E N C E O r o n o , M N 9 /2 /2 0 1 of 1 P r o j e c t N u m b e r : D a t e : 1 S h e e t s : o f I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . P r i n t N a m e : S i g n e d : L i c e n s e N u m b e r : D a t e : S 1 T r e v o r A x n e r 4 5 4 7 0 3 4 0 7 K i l m e r L a n e N o r t h S u i t e 4 P l y m o u t h , M N , 5 5 4 4 1 T e l 6 1 2 - 7 0 8 - 3 5 7 2 w w w . h a n s o n g r o u p m n . c o m COPYRIGHT HANSON GROUP LLC 2020© P r o j e c t : C l i e n t : O c t o b e r 2 , 2 0 2 0 0 . 5 4 6 1 1 0 - 2 - 2 0 R e v i s i o n 1 5 3 E a s t L a k e S t r e e t W a y z a t a , M N 5 5 3 9 1 R e v D e s c r i p t i o n D a t e H a y d o c k R e s i d e n c e 4 5 3 5 N S h o r e D r i v e O r o n o , M N P L A N S S H O W N A R E F O R A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N R E F E R E N C E O N L Y . A S - B U I L T D I M E N S I O N S A R E T O B E V E R I F I E D . P L A N S A R E N O T I N T E N D E D T O B E S C A L E D A C C U R A T E R E M O D E L P R I N T S P A R T I A L M A I N L E V E L D E C K P L A N S H O W N F O R L O C A T I O N R E F E R E N C E O N L Y 1 S 1 R E F E R E N C E P L A N LIMITED PROJECT SCOPEDESIGN OF A CANTED DECK EXTENSION AND NEW DROPPED BEAM AT ANEXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE DONE INACCORDANCE WITH THESE DRAWINGS, STANDARD INDUSTRY PRACTICE,AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE.GENERAL NOTES1.THESE DOCUMENTS APPLY TO STRUCTURAL ONLY. REFER TO DECKDRAWING PREPARED BY REVISION LAST DATED 9-2-20 FOR MOREINFORMATION. THIS STRUCTURAL DRAWING IS NOT INTENDED TO BEFULL REMODEL PLANS, BUT IS ONLY INTENDED TO CONVEY THE BASICSTRUCTURAL INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR THE LIMITED SCOPENOTED ABOVE.2.SCOPE OF ENGINEERING INCLUDES ITEMS SPECIFICALLY NOTEDABOVE AND ON PLANS ONLY. REVIEW OF EXISTING FRAMING ANDFOUNDATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER PROPOSED REMODEL ITEMSARE NOT INCLUDED UNDER THIS SCOPE.3.A SITE VISIT WAS NEITHER PERFORMED NOR REQUESTED.CONTRACTOR AND BUILDER ARE TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ANDCONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. NOTIFY THE HANSONGROUP IF DISCREPANCIES ARISE.4.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDER TO PROVIDE ALL FUTUREPLAN OR FIELD CHANGES TO THE HANSON GROUP FOR REVIEW.VERIFY EXISTING FRAMING LAYOUTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDMATERIAL ACQUISITION.5.ADEQUATE SHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION IS THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR.6.MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR.7.ARCHITECTURAL ITEMS INCLUDING FLASHING AND WATERPROTECTION AT THE LEDGER IS BY OTHERS.8.RAILINGS, STAIRS, AND DECKING ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THESUPPLIER.FOUNDATION NOTES1.EXISTING FOOTINGS ARE BY OTHERS.FRAMING NOTES1.ALL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE WITH ADEQUATE SIMPSON, USPOR EQUAL JOIST HANGERS, CLIPS, POST CAPS, AND POST BASES.2.VERIFY DROPPED VERSUS FLUSH BEAM CONDITIONS WITH DECKPLANS.3.ALL OTHER FASTENERS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE w/ CODE TABLER602.3(1).4.ALL NEW DECK MEMBERS TO BE TREATED.5.MEMBERS NOTED ARE DESIGNED FOR L/360 DEFLECTION CRITERIA. IFADDITIONAL STIFFNESS IS REQUIRED, CONTACT THE HANSON GROUP.6.DECK HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR LATERAL BRACING. PROVIDECODE REQUIRED UPLIFT CONNECTIONS AT ALL POSTS AND TENSIONCONNECTIONS AT ALL LEDGERS AS REQUIRED.MATERIALSTREATED LUMBER:SYP NO.2 GRADE OR BETTERGLULAM:SYP 26FV4 (TREATED)LOADSFLOOR LIVE LOAD:40 PSFFLOOR DEAD LOAD:10 PSFCODES2020 MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL CODE E X I S T I N G D E C K J O I S T S A R E R E P O R T E D T O B E 2 x 1 0 s A T 1 6 " O . C . I N T H I S A R E A 5 ' - 0 " M I N . 3 ' - 0 " M A X . C A N T I L E V E R E D D E C K E X T E N S I O N 2 S 1 F R A M I N G D E T A I L 2 x 1 0 C A N T I L E V E R E D J O I S T S @ 1 6 " O . C . M A X . F A S T E N J O I S T S T O G E T H E R w / ( 2 ) R O W S 0 . 1 3 1 " x 3 " N A I L S @ 8 " O . C . 2 x 1 0 R I M G L U L A M B E A M - S E E P L A N E X I S T I N G 2 x 1 0 ' s B L O C K S O L I D B E T W E E N C A N T E D J O I S T S w / ( 2 ) 2 x 1 0 L U M B E R A L I G N E D T O I N S I D E O F G L U L A M F O R S U P P O R T O F E X I S T I N G J O I S T E N D S R A I L I N G B Y O T H E R S BL O C K S O L I D B E T W E E N J O I S T A T C A N T E D BA C K S P A N E N D w / 2 x 1 0 L U M B E R E X I S T I N G B E A M N E W 2 x 1 0 S I S T E R E D J O I S T S A T 1 6 " O . C . C A N T E D 3 ' - 0 " M A X . - S E E 2 / S 1 V E R I F Y 6 x 6 P O S T E A C H E N D - C U T D O W N F O R NE W D R O P P E D B E A M A N D P R O V I D E N E W S T A N D A R D P O S T C A P T Y P . N E W D R O P P E D B E A M O P T I O N S : 5 1 4 x 1 3 3 4 G L U L A M ( 1 2 " ± M A X . D E F L E C T I O N ) 5 1 4 x 1 5 1 8 G L U L A M ( 3 8 " ± M A X . D E F L E C T I O N ) S P A N N I N G M A X I M U M 1 8 ' - 0 " A L T E R N A T I V E I S T O R E M O V E E X I S T I N G J O I S T S A N D I N S T A L L N E W F U L L L E N G T H 2 x 1 0 M E M B E R S S I M P S O N M L 2 8 Z B E T W E E N O N E S I D E O F E X I S T I N G J O I S T S A N D N E W B L O C K I N G S I M P S O N H 1 Z B E T W E E N C A N T E D J O I S T S A N D G L U L A M D E C K I N G B Y O T H E R S E X I S T I N G C O N C R E T E P I E R - R E Q U I R E S M I N . 2 4 " Ø A T B A S E B Y O T H E R S E X I S T I N G C O N C R E T E P I E R - R E Q U I R E S M I N . 20 " Ø A T B A S E B Y O T H E R S M A Y R E Q U I R E M I N O R N O T C H A T T O P O F N E W B E A M O V E R P O R T I O N O F C O L U M N F O R E X . B E A M B E A R I N G MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2. LA21-000045 REVISION LLC, 4535 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 47 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING DECK. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Jay Perry of Revision LLC, Applicant, was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis said the Applicant has requested an average lakeshore setback (ALS) variance in order to construct a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck. A small portion of the existing deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback currently. The proposed deck extension is shown to encroach approximately 3 feet lakeward of the ALS line. The Applicant identified the location of the home to the west as the practical difficulty supporting the variance and has provided supporting documentation in the packet and should be asked for additional testimony tonight. Staff agrees that the home to the west contributes to the practical difficulty on this property and the curve of the shoreline also creates challenge regarding the ALS. They have not received any public comments and Staff recommends approval of the ALS variance as requested provided the hardcover not increase above the 25% maximum. The Applicant is showing 24.8% hardcover. Jay Perry, Revision LLC, Wayzata, is asking for the two feet to be approved, basically the size of the desktop in front of the Commissioners. If the home to the west decides to remodel or be torn down and rebuilt they can bring that home closer to the lake and by doing that, it would give the Applicant plenty of room to add the footage. They are just asking for the variance to get that extra two feet at this time. They do not need to put any more footings but are just cantilevering the deck outward. Gettman asked what is the actual difficulty they are trying to address in having those two additional feet towards the lake. Mr. Perry noted they are just trying to open up the deck. Gettman asked why two feet rather than five feet? Mr. Perry replied in cantilevering he can only go three feet and the clients just want the two feet. The extra two feet would allow a 24 inch table to be placed on the deck. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Ressler is in support of the application and Staff’s recommendations. They have seen other examples of applications like this that have been positively received by the City Council. Kirchner echoes those statements. Bollis is generally in favor but would like to note that in the previous applications the other house that could be built closer was extremely far back, so this is a little different. If they allow this house to go another two feet closer, that will change the ALS for the next house over more than it is today – and then that house can go two feet closer – which will change the next house and the next house. In general, he is not in favor of the ALS line at all as this will trigger a domino effect down the line. He would be in favor of the application. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Gettman asked to pull up Exhibit G on screen and noted how much farther down the house ends up going or extending towards the lake. Curtis pointed out the homes on screen and noted the impact of the deck extension is kind of minimal as it is an angle across one direction rather than another. Bollis noted it would affect the ALS for 4515 and asked if that is correct. Curtis replied yes. Ressler said 4595 already has quite a bit of structure going lakeward so that is not a giant difference and adding that two feet does not appear that it would make a major change because of how much 4595 brings it lakeward. That is the reason it does not seem like a big deal to him. McCutcheon agrees with Ressler; the Commission has seen these before and he understands the practical difficulty to the house to the left and he noted it is not egregious as they are not asking the entire length of the house. Erickson supports the Staff recommendation. Ressler moved, Bollis seconded, to approve LA21-000045 Revision LLC, 4535 North Shore Drive, Requests an Average Lakeshore Setback Variance in Order to Construct a 47 Square Foot Addition to the Existing Deck as Applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 05/21/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/21/2021 60-Day Review Period EXTENDED Expires: 09/21/2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 19 July 2021 Subject: #LA21-000045, Revision LLC, 4535 North Shore Drive, Variance Public Hearing Background The applicant has requested an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck (shown in yellow on Exhibit C). A small portion (2-3 feet) of the existing deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback currently. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the location of the home to the west as the practical difficulty supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff agrees that the home to the west contributes to the practical difficulty on this property. The concave curve of the shoreline also creates a challenge regarding the average lakeshore setback affecting this property. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to expand a lakeside deck. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE #LA21-000045 19 July 2021 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 + 78-1379 – Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear / Street 30’ +100’ No Change West Side 7.5’ +20’ No Change East Side 7.5’ +40’ No Change Lakeshore 75’ ±182’ existing deck 174’ new deck area Average Lakeshore The new deck portion will extend approximately 3 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. Section 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 23,560 s.f. 5,890 s.f. (25 %) 5,805 s.f. (24.6%) 5,852 s.f. (24.85%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Code Section 78-1279) The proposed deck extension is shown encroaching approximately 3 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line based on the location of the deck improvements on the two neighboring lakeshore lots. The shoreline curves inward slightly, and the home to the west is situated farther from the lake than the subject property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The requested average lakeshore setback variance is in harmony with the Ordinance as the FILE #LA21-000045 19 July 2021 Page 3 of 4 adjacent neighbors have been notified and have not indicated their views of the lake will be impacted by the improvements, and hardcover will be conforming. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The deck project in the residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit portions of a deck lakeward of the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable; the linear shoreline and location of the neighboring homes result in the existing non-conforming condition. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the neighboring homes, the setback of the existing home from the lake, and the orientation of the shoreline are conditions not created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to permit an extension of the deck on the lakeside of the home will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners or alter the character of the locality. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a deck is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The location of the existing improvements/ home and the location of the neighboring homes generally in line with the applicants’ home along the shoreline are conditions unique to this property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The location of the existing improvements/ home, and the location of the neighboring homes along the shoreline are unique conditions affecting the subject Property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has indicated the variance is necessary. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. FILE #LA21-000045 19 July 2021 Page 4 of 4 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application of the average lakeshore setback on this property severely limits the options for expanding and/or improving the home on the lake side; the granting of the requested variance is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty resulting from the location of the existing home in relation to the neighboring homes. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. Hardcover shall not increase above the 25% maximum. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List & Neighbor Acknowledgment Exhibit H. Plat Map Exhibit I. 60-day extension AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. Approve by resolution the proposed Master Development Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat for a proposed 48 unit apartment building, subject to several conditions. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on May 19, 2021 and considered to be complete on that date. The 60-Day review period has been extended to September 16, 2021. 3. Background. At its meeting on July 26, 2021, the City Council directed some changes to the resolution approving the Eagle Ridge apartment building project. The main change was the starting elevation for determining height, and the Council agreed to use the grades that existed prior to the site being graded for the townhome office project. The starting elevation has been established as 1022. The draft resolution is attached as Exhibit A. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Preliminary Plat C. Original Building Height calculation D. Revised Building Height calculation E. Building Height calculation - predevelopment References Case 20-53 file PC Staff report and Exhibits 6-21-21 CC Staff report and Exhibits 7-12-21 CC Staff report and Exhibits 7-26-21 Item No.: 11 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000042 – Mohegan Hansen Arch o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Master Development Plan Approval, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat – Resolution No. 7207 Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN, AND GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT, ZONE CHANGE APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2060 WAYZATA BLVD WEST -FILE NO. LA21-000042 WHEREAS, CBS MN Properties, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter the "Developer") is owner of the property located at 2060 Wayzata Blvd West within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 1-6, Block 1, Amber Woods Office Center (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested General Concept Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat Approval for development of the Property. Proposed is a rezoning from B-6 PUD, Highway Commercial to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District for construction of a 48- unit market rate apartment building; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2021 the Developer filed a complete formal application with the City for rezoning, concept plan and preliminary plat approval for a 48 unit market rate apartment building on the Property; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application and reviewed it on June 21, 2021, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission information, published for the June 21, 2021 meeting, including staff report and exhibits, is incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on June 21, 2021 recommended on a vote of 7-0 that the Council approve the rezoning to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District; grant general concept plan, and preliminary plat approval subject to a number of conditions and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council reviewed the sketch plan for the Property in April 2021, and has reviewed the formal applications at its regular meeting on July 12, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council reviewed the project for height calculation on July 26, 2021; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 2 WHEREAS, the City Council hereby makes the following findings in regard to this application for RPUD General Concept Plan, Preliminary Plat approval, and rezoning: FINDINGS A. Rezoning from B-6 PUD to RPUD 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000042. 2. The Property is currently zoned B-6 PUD and was originally developed as an office use. The Property contains approximately 2.48 acres. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property as high density residential (20-25 units per acre). 3. The property has sat vacant for many years; the city recognizes that there is not a market, nor is one likely, for office uses on the subject parcel. 4. The city desires to identify additional areas appropriate for high density residential wi thin the community. This site was deemed appropriate for high density residential given the adjacent Orono Woods senior housing project, the high traffic Wayzata Boulevard, and the presence of municipal utilities. 5. The Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is intended to be developed using municipal sewer and water, a requirement of the RPUD zoning district. 7. Because the property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for higher density residential, the property should be rezoned consistent with the intended and guided use. The most appropriate zoning for the intended use is RPUD, Residential Planned Unit Development District. 8. The property contains approximately 2.48 acres. The property meets the lot size requirements of Zoning Code Section 78-626 (1) for rezoning to RPUD because the property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between commercial area and residential areas. 9. Rezoning the property to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development is appropriate based on the higher density residential nature of the development, which meets the following general purposes of the RPUD District: a) incorporates flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 3 b) provides lifecycle housing with the potential to meet affordable and moderate cost housing needs; c) incorporates energy conservation through the clustering of buildings and land uses; d) preserves desirable site characteristics and open space; e) provides design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; f) results in a sensitive development in the transitional area located between a high capacity roadway and the high density housing to the east; and g) yields development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding for higher density than the typical urban and rural residential development in Orono. 10. Conformity with Zoning District Standards. In relation to the RPUD standards, there are specific guidelines for development in Zoning Code Section 78-626(7), including Setbacks, Height limitations, and outside storage limitations. However, the concept of a planned unit development process is to allow flexibility in design. Section 78 -626 (16) provides for flexibility in RPUD standards, as follows: (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. This proposed development concept requires flexibility from the RPUD district lot standards for attached dwelling units. The table below identifies specific standards which require flexibility, which the City Council finds acceptable: Section Standard Conforming? 1 (1) Minimum area: 5 acres or certain exceptions… The property to be platted is 2.48 acres. The Council finds that the project conforms to the exception under C: The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 4 intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. 2 Uses. Multifamily residential uses are permitted. 3 Sewer availability Yes. 4 Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property high density residential, 20-25 units per acre. Including the day care center, density comes in at 18.23 units per acre, (48 units over 2.63 acres) which is lower than the 20 units per acre required by the Comprehensive Plan. A Comprehensive Plan amendment will be required. 5 Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. None requested. 6 Floor Ratio, up to 1.0 Calculated at 0.69 (79,125 sq ft of floor area/ 114,562 sq ft of gross land). 7a Setbacks. Setbacks are 50’ to Wayzata Blvd, 35’ to the rear and the side. Drive lanes 20’ from exterior property lines. The plans reflect a setback of 82 feet from the front property line, 36 feet from the side, and 35 feet from the rear property line. It should be noted that these setbacks are measured from the district boundary, the building itself will be developed on its own lot, established just outside the building footprint. 7b Height, stories, roof style The ordinance requires a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof; the proposal is for a flat roof. The Council did not have a concern with the flat roof proposed at sketch plan because of the commercial nature of the street, and a desire to minimize massing impact to the street. The Council requires modifications so that CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 5 the building is no higher than 30 feet in defined height. For purposes of establishing the existing ground level, the Council agrees to use 1022, the highest existing grade prior to development of the site. 7c Outside storage No. None proposed. 11 10% Private Recreational Area (Active and/or Passive) The floor plans show areas labeled “amenity” on the 2nd and 3rd floor, and a 750 sq ft amenity deck on the third floor. 10 percent of the project is 10,800 sq ft. The site conforms. 12 Common Ownership Conforming. Association documents required. 13 Signage Signage located on the building and free standing, details not yet developed. 14 Landscaping Landscaping plans provided, appear to be conforming. 15 Architectural Standards Elevations provided. 16 Flexibility from standards Requested: Hardcover 17 Traffic Studies Not suggested. 18 Building Permits Expected. 19 General regulations applicability Expected. 20 Lighting Lighting plans provided. 21 Trails Sidewalks and public walks proposed. B. Environmental Considerations; Site Planning & Amenities; Transportation; 11. Landscaping. The preliminary landscaping plan will be evaluated for compliance with the very detailed RPUD landscaping requirements. The preliminary landscape plans appear to conform to the RPUD standards. 12. Building Height. For purposes of establishing building height, the Council agrees to use 1022 as the Highest Adjacent Grade. The top of the cornice of the flat roofed building shall not be more than 30 feet above this elevation. 13. Hardcover. By virtue of the RPUD zoning, per 78-1701(4)(a) the property is assigned to Hardcover Protection Tier 4, which allows up to 50% hardcover of the gross lot area. The proposed hardcover is 60%, due in part to the need for parking to support the 48 units and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 6 the existing day care center, and need for onsite circulation. The Council finds flexibility is appropriate given the high intensity uses surround the property (Wayzata Blvd to the south, Senior Housing to the east, and a gas station to the west.) If the parcel was not zoned RPUD, there would be no hardcover limitation due to the site distance from lakes. 14.Easements Required. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries will be required. Additional easement or property may be requested by Hennepin County to permit expansion of the stormwater pond east of the site, for Hennepin Council retention and treatment needs. 15.Trail. Connection to the trail along Wayzata Blvd is required. 16.10% Private Park RPUD Requirement. The private recreation area of ‘10% of the platted property’ required under the RPUD standards will be satisfied via various amenities proposed by the applicant, including dog run, roof top deck, community room, and exercise room. 17.Stormwater Management. Stormwater management is proposed to be provided by the existing stormwater pond area east of the site. The stormwater facilities will be subject to standard drainage easements. In addition to the City of Orono, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have approval authority over the applicants’ stormwater management plan. Final stormwater plans will be subject to the recommendations and approval of the City Engineer. 18. The applicant has provided General Concept Plans and Preliminary Plat Drawings attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A-1 through A-19 including: Plans prepared by Loucks and Associates: A1 – Preliminary Plat dated 5-19-21 A2 – Existing Conditions Plan Sheet C1-1–dated 6-14-21 A3 – Demolition Plan Sheet C1-2–dated 6-14-21 A4 – Site Plan Sheet C2-1–dated 6-14-21 A5 – Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet C3-1–dated 6-14-21 A6 – SWPPP Sheet C3-2–dated 6-14-21 A7 – SWPPP Notes Sheet C3-3–dated 6-14-21 A8 – Utility Plan Sheet C4-1–dated 6-14-21 A9 – Detail Sheets Sheet C8-1–dated 6-14-21 A10 – Landscape Plan Sheet L1-1–dated 6-14-21 A11 – Landscape Details Sheet L2-1–dated 6-14-21 Plans prepared by Mohegan Hanson, Architect: A12 – Title Sheet A11 – Sheet A200 – Floor Plan Lower Level dated 6-19-21 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 7 A12 – Sheet A201 – Floor Plan – Level 1 dated 6-19-21 A13 – Sheet A202 – 1st Floor Plan dated 6-19-21 A14 – Sheet A203 – 2nd Floor Plan dated 6-19-21 A15 – Sheet A400 – Unit Plans dated 6-19-21 A16 – Sheet A300 Exterior Building Elevations – 6-19-21 A17 – Sheet A300A – Renderings A18 – Lighting Plan A19 – Patio relocation sketch dated 7-6-21 Council finds that the plans submitted are generally sufficient to indicate the intent of the developer and the potential impacts of the project. 19. City Engineer Comments. General Development Plans and Final Plat approvals will be reviewed for conformity City standards. 20. The City Council finds that the development of this property must set a high standard for the quality, character, context and compatibility of development desired by the City for high density development in Orono. The Council finds that the proposed rezoning and development of the property for is appropriate, will not have negative impacts on the surrounding properties when all approval conditions are met. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the General Concept Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat for development of the property at 2060 Wayzata Blvd West shall be approved, subject to the following declarations and conditions: A. Conditions. 1)Metropolitan Council shall approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment allowing for a reduction in guided density below 20 units per acre. 2)Developer shall provide a final Master Development Plan for the development that conforms to all standards of the RPUD district except as modified herein, and shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all RPUD standards have been met and shall demonstrate where such standards have not been met, and shall satisfy the City Council that non-compliance with said standards is remedied in a manner acceptable to the Council. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 8 3) Building design and floorplans shall be generally consistent with the examples included in the attached Exhibit A-11 thru A15. 4) Flexibility shall being granted for the building roof design and hardcover as noted in the Findings section above. 5) Applicant to confirm with SHPO that there are no archaeological sites within the property. 6) The Developer shall install stormwater management facilities generally as shown on the various attached plans. Developer shall provide suitable evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval of the stormwater management plan before Development Plan and Final Plat Approval will be granted. The Developer shall provide sufficient drainage and utility easements as necessary to allow for future City maintenance access for stormwater management facilities. 7)Grading, Erosion Control a) Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and to the approved SWPPP. All erosion controls as required by the City and the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencing excavation on the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working order until the site is revegetated. b) The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and vegetation outside of the construction limits area. 8) City Engineer and Fire Department approval. a)Proposed plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the Final Plan set. The Public Works Department, Fire Department and any other pertinent reviewing agencies shall review and approve all utility improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided and are subject to approval by the Public Works Department and City Engineer. b) Any additional plans and specifications deemed necessary by the City as review progresses. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 9 9) Additional conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and confirmed by the City Council: a.) The building shall be no higher than 30 feet, defined height. b.) To reduce the noise and activity, the private patio in the NE corner of the site shall be relocated to an area not adjacent to single family residential. c.) A fence should be added to provide additional security for the residential neighborhood to the north, Sugarwoods. B.Platting Process. Applicant shall complete all requirements for Final Plat Approval as follows. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the City at least weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1). Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 11”x 17”. Drawing to include: A.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property lines. B. Naming of plat. 2). Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. D.Signed Developers Agreement and Financial Guarantee for construction of improvements. 3). Final plat application fee to be paid. 4). Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the development. 5). Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The City CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 10 Engineer shall review an estimate of improvement costs provided by the applicant, including but not limited to stormwater management, landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, driveways and parking areas, trails, sidewalks, and retaining walls, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of 125% of the improvement costs. This financial guarantee may be in the form of the Letter of Credit or cash. 6). Fees required: Development of the property is subject to the various fees. Below is a summary of the fees, collectible in full at the time of approval of the final plat. The fees below, based on the 2021 fee schedule, will be recalculated at the time of Final Plat: Sewer Connection Charge: $5,380/unit x 48 units = $258,240.00 Water Connection Charge: $4,370/unit x 48 units = $209,760.00 Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee: Residential > 4 units/acre: $8,490/ac x 2.48 acres = $21,055.00 A SAC fee imposed by the Metropolitan Council will be due upon issuance of the building permit. C. This General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat approval is based upon the known issues that may affect this project, but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. D. This General Concept Plan Approval resolution approves the development concept subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of this resolution and all other requirements of the City. This resolution does not permit construction of the project illustrated in Exhibit A. Such approval shall only be considered when the City Council approves the Master Plan and the Final Plan, after finding that all “Conditions for Development Plan Approval” as identified herein have been met. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of August, 2021. ATTEST: _________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor ____________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 5 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 1 9 : 4 6 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 1 9 7 6 7 B - P r e P L A T OUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION EAGLE RIDGE APARTMENTS 2060 WAYZATA BLVD. W. ORONO, MN 55356 CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55330 763-424-5505 1. Prepared May 19, 2021. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 2060 Wayzata Blvd. W., Orono, Minnesota 55356. 3. The bearings for this survey are based on the plat of AMBER WOODS OFICE CENTRE. 4. Benchmark: MnDOT 2713 AG - in Long Lake, in the sidewalk in the NW corner of C.R. 146 Bridge No. 27273 over T.H. 12 and the Railroad, 0.2 , mile south along Brown Road from the junction of T.H. 912 and C.R. 146, 25.0 feet west of C.R. 146, 300.0 feet south of City Hall, 3.0 feet east of the NE corner of the NW pillar with a light pole, 3.0 feet west of a curb, 0.2 Foot north of an expansion joint. Elevation = 997.40 feet (NGVD 29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located approx. 125 feet east of entrance from Wayzata Blvd. W. and 125 feet north of Wayzata Blvd. W., as shown hereon. Elevation = 1011.82 feet (NGVD 29) 5. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0302F, Community Panel No. 270178 0302 F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 6. The field work was completed on March 24, 2021. OWNER/DEVELOPER: CBS MN Properties, LLC PO Box 575 Long Lake, MN 55356 Current Zoning: B-6 PUD (Highway Commercial) Current Building Setbacks:Current Parking Setback: Front 30 feet Front 15 feet West Side 10 feet West Side 5 feet East Side 35 feet East Side 10 feet Rear 35 feet Rear 10 feet Proposed Zoning: RPUD (Residential Planned Unit Development) Proposed Building Setbacks:Proposed Parking Setbacks: Front 30 feet Front 15 feet Side 35 feet Side 5 feet Rear 35 feet Rear 10 feet ZONING INFORMATION Areas: Proposed Lot 1 Area = 6,242 +/- square feet or 0.14 +/- acres Proposed Lot 2 Area = 32,221 +/- square feet or 0.74 +/- acres Proposed Lot 3 Area = 76,300 +/- square feet or 1.75 +/- acres Total Property Area = 114,763 +/- square feet or 2.63 +/- acres SITE DATA SPOT ELEVATION CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE GUY WIRE TREE (GENERAL) DECIDUOUS TREE OVERHEAD UTILITY TOP OF CURB TOP NUT HYDRANT RETAINING WALL SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB CUT MAPPED WATERMAIN POWER POLE SURVEY LEGEND POST INDICATOR VALVE License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS 48988 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19-767B MLS SFM MLS CMS 05/19/21 05/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 OF 1 SITE Council Exhibit A LA21-42 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 2 8 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 1 - 1 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-1 1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM AN PARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS & PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION PLANS (AMBER WOODS). UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SUCH AS SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, FORCEMAIN, ETC. WAS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF ORONO RECORD PLANS. 2. WE HAVE SHOWN BURIED STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON AND/OR SERVING THE SITE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS DO NOT CONSISTENTLY RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY AND LOCATION PURPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE UTILITY OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM THE MAIN LINE TO THE CUSTOMER'S STRUCTURE OR FACILITY - THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. IF A PRIVATE SERVICE TO AN ADJOINER'S SITE CROSSES THIS SITE OR A SERVICE TO THIS SITE CROSSES AN ADJOINER, IT MAY NOT BE LOCATED SINCE MOST OPERATORS WILL NOT MARK SUCH "PRIVATE" SERVICES. C. SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS DURING WINTER MONTHS MAY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. D. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FIELD LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR INCONCLUSIVE. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS ARE VERY OFTEN AT A VERY SMALL SCALE, OR NO SCALE. E. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THE SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651-454-0002. F. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SUCH AS NATURAL GAS, ELECTRIC LINES, TELEPHONE LINES, FIBEROPTIC LINES, CABLE TELEVISION LINES, UNDERGROUND PIPELINES, ETC. WAS SUPPLIED OR LOCATED BY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. EXISTING CONDITIONS GENERAL NOTES SPOT ELEVATION CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE GUY WIRE TREE (GENERAL) DECIDUOUS TREE OVERHEAD UTILITY TOP OF CURB TOP NUT HYDRANT RETAINING WALL SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB CUT MAPPED WATERMAIN POWER POLE SURVEY LEGEND TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TYPREMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT & VALVE REMOVE PORTION OF RETAINING WALL REMOVE RETAINING WALLS REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING WATER & SANI. SERVICE 6" DIP FIRE 1" DOMESTIC COPPER 4" PVC SANI. REMOVE & REPLACE CASTING. SEE UTILITY PLAN REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WATER & SANI. SERVICE 6" DIP FIRE 1" DOMESTIC COPPER 4" PVC SANI. REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE PARTIALLY BUILT BUILDING REMOVE & SALVAGE EX. LIGHTPOLES, TYP. REMOVE & SALVAGE EX. LIGHTPOLES, TYP. SIGN TO REMAIN & BE ALTERED AS NEEDED N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 3 1 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 1 - 2 D e m o l i t i o n P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DEMOLITION PLAN C1-2 REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING METERS, SIGNS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING DEMOLITION LEGEND: TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND SWPPP FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALS ARE TO BE MADE TO A VERTICAL SAW CUT OR TO A NEAT MILLED EDGE. 7. CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER AND OTHER POURED CONCRETE ITEMS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO AN EXISTING EXPANSION OR CONTRACTION JOINT. SAW CUT AS NECESSARY FOR A NEAT EDGE OF REMOVAL. 8. ALL REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN A MANNER MEETING ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL SIGNS, MAILBOXES, ETC. 10. ANY DAMAGE TO ITEMS NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION WITH NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. SITE DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING HCHC EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE 15 10 2 7 11 5 12 EX. RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS MEET & MATCH EX. CURB PROPERTY LINE 1' OUTSIDE PATIOS REINFORCED TURF 45'R 17'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 10'R 3.4'R HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT MEET & MATCH EX. CURB DOG RUN 16.4 14.3 18.0 28.0 22.9 70.2 286.2 164.2 28.0 15'R 5.0 5.0 CONCRETE WALK EX. RETAINING WALL EX. PLAY AREA EX. PLAY AREA DOG WALK EXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLE BLACK WROUGHT IRON FENCE ON TOP OF WALLS SIGN 2.0 OVERHANG N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 0 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 2 - 1 S i t e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS SITE PLAN C2-1 PAVEMENT TYPES CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE & REPLACE PARKING LOT 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CURRENT ZONING: B-6 PUD PROPOSED ZONING:B-6 PUD PROPERTY AREA:2.63 +/- AC DISTURBED AREA:1.62 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.85 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.60 AC TOTAL PARKING: 62 SURFACE STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 66 UNDERGROUND STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 1. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET(S) OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. 11.ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 12.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED 11/30/16. 13.SUBGRADE PREPARATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2112. THE TOP 3 FEET SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 14.AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE MNDOT 2211 CLASS 5. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD. 15.PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2360 WITH MIX DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD. 16.CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 200 FEET AT ALL FIXED OBJECTS. CONTRACTIONS JOINTS EVERY 10 FEET. 17.CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2521. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS AT ALL FIVES OBJECTS. CONTRACTION JLINTS EVERY 5 FEET. 18.WORKING HOURS ARE 7 AM - 7 PM (MONDAY - FRIDAY) AND 9 AM - 7 PM ( SATURDAY.) A 48 HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. SITE NOTES SITE DATA GENERAL NOTES EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x 1017.5 x 1007.5 x1007.5 x x 1009.75 1008.6 x 1018.0 x 1017.5 x x x1000.6x x 1015.5x1010.0 x 1013.5 x1008.4 x 1012.0 x 1010.5 x x 1016.5 xx x1016.5 x1018.0 x 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW x x x1010.05 x 1016.5 x1016.95 x1016.25 x 1017.0x 1017.0 x 1018.25 TW 1018.0 GWx1017.5 x 1016.5 x x 1018.0 x1011.25 x 1016.1 x 1014.1 x 1017.6 x 1018.0 x 1018.2 x 1017.85 x1015.9 x1016.5 x1015.45 x1014.95 x 1016.7 x 1014.1 x1014.2 x1018.0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 x 1016.5 8 8 x 1016.5 8 8 8 8 x1017.0 EOF x1017.0 x1017.85 x 1017.75 x1016.88 TC x 1007.5 x1007.6 x1008.1 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 x 1018.0 TW 1017.1 GW x1016.5 1018.5 TW 1017.1 GW 1017.75 TW 1017.5 GW 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW x 1017.25 TW 1012.0 GW 1017.75 TW 1017.5 GW 1009.5 TW 1001.8 GW 1009.0 TW 1000.6 GW 1009.0 TW 1005.0 GW 1005.0 TW 1000.6 GW 1017.5 TW 1009.5 GW 1010.5 TW 1010.3 GW 1009.25 TW 1009.0 GW 1007.25 TW 1007.0 GW 1017.5 TW 1008.5 GW 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT GRADE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 3 7 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 1 G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-1 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR SOIL STABILIZATION INFORMATION. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DETAILS SHEETS OF THESE PLANS. ALL CURB SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE-UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF PREMIUM TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO.16.61753.100), DATED 12/08/16 AS PREPARED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 6.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 7.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 8.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 9.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 11.A STREET SWEEPER MUST BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 3 HOURS UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY THAT THE STREETS NEED TO BE SWEPT. 12.THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. 13.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT. THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND TURF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED. 15.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. 16.FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE +/-0.1 FEET TO FINISH GRADES. 17.UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BLOW THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7:00 AM - 10:00 PM, MONDAY - SATURDAY. A 48 HOUR NOTICED IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. 21.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) SHALL BE LANDLOK 450, AS MANUFACTURED BY PROPEX GEOSOLUTIONS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OF THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. 22.STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL, FENCING AND HANDRAIL DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 23.REGIONAL POND AND STORM SEWER EAST OF THE SITE MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK. THE POND BOTTOM MUST BE VERIFIED WITH SURVEY PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND ONCE WORK COMMENCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ANY SEDIMENT ADDED TO THE POND OR SEWER DUE TO SITE CONSTRUCTION. CITY TO BE GIVEN 48 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE REVIEW IS WANTED. 24.RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 INLET PROTECTION TYP INLET PROTECTION TYP INLET PROTECTION TYP SILT FENCE TYP SILT FENCE TYP SILT FENCE TYP ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 5 1 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 2 S W P P P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN BIO ROLLS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE SHEET C3-3 FOR SWPPP NOTES AND C3-4 FOR SWPPP DETAILS. GENERAL NOTES C ADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 2 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 3 S W P P N o t e s & D e t a i l s OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES & DETAILS C3-3 1.THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A 48 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED UTILITIES. 2. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE & BIO ROLLS AROUND SITE 3. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE 4. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 5. REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES 6. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 7. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 8. ROUGH GRADE SITE 9. IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND/OR BALANCE AS NEEDED 10. INSTALL UTILITIES 11. INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 12. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 13. INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS 14. FINAL GRADE SITE 15. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES 16. SEED AND MULCH 17. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND BIO ROLLS AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 3. SITE DATA: AREA OF DISTURBANCE / PROPERTY AREA: 2.63 AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.85 AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.60 AC GENERAL SOIL TYPE: SEE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 4. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR & INSPECTED BY CITY PRIOR TO ANY WORK. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. 6. ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 7. ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. DENOTES SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ALL 3:1 SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 8. ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 9. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 10. SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S. 11. IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN IS TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY PARTIALLY EXCAVATE AND LEAVE THE BASIN 2 FEET ABOVE FINISHED ELEVATION. 12. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH WDNR DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 13. EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. 14. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 15. THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.B., PART II.C, PART II.B-F, PART V, PART IV AND APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. 16.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE WDNR. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A. FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT PART IV.G. HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. B. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. 16.INSPECTIONS A. INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. B. EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. C. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D. FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. E. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 17.MINIMUM MAINTENANCE A. SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS B. SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS D. CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 HOURS. E. PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS 18. THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 19. OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. 20. SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A. THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. C. THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 21. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA A. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASH-OUT CONTAINER WITH RAIN PROTECTION PER PLAN. B. CONCRETE WASH-OUT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNAGE STATING "CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA DO NOT OVERFILL". C. CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER NEEDS TO BE PUMPED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STANDING WATER IN WASHOUT AREA. 22. IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. 23. PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 24. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 25. RESPONSIBILITIES A. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A PERSON WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ B. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ 26. THE MINNESOTA DNR OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS OR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMPS. 27. LIST OF CONTACTS SWPPP NOTES INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT 3 FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) 8" 12" 4" 2" 2 4 FILTER BAG INSERT 1 OVERFLOW HOLES (2" X 4" HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) 1/2 W D W 1/ 2 D INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET 4 NOTES: SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, 3886 & 3891. MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES LISTED ON Mn/DOT'S APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. 1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, MEETING SPEC. 3886. 2. FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL. 3. INSTALLATION NOTES: 3.1. DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES, MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. 3.2. THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. 3.3. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. 4. FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3015 DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF ROCK FILTER LOG LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 0 1,850 0 20 SEEDING AC 1.25± ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CERTIFICATION NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMPAIRED WATER TYPE OF SPECIAL WATER LONG LAKE NO YES RECEIVING WATERS WOLSFLED LAKE NO YES TITLE NAME OWNER DALE RICHARDSON COMPANY PHONE NUMBER PROJECT MANAGER JEFF SHOPEK LOUCKS 763-496-6715 ENGINEER SWPPP VAL ANDERSON 763-496-6728LOUCKS CONTRACTOR SITE MANGER PENDING CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC 612-708-6085 PENDING WOLSFELD WOODS SNA LAKE/OTHER YES NO SCIENTIFIC & NATURAL SITE LONG LAKE RECEIVING WATER WOLSFELD LAKE & WOODS NOT RECEIVING WATERS MERCURY, NUTRIENTS NUTRIENTS 2023 SPECIAL & IMPAIRED WATERS EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 HCHC 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 HYDRANT W/ GATE VALVE 6" DIP WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" DIP CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 8" DIP CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 8" DIP CORE DRILL SANI. SERVICE INV-1000.78 22 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% SANI. SERVICE INV-1001.00 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN (VERIFY EXISTING SIZE & MATERIAL) CBMH 10 CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP RIM: 1008.5 INV: 1004.1 FES 11 RIM: 1009.0 12' - 12" RCP @ 2.0% CBMH 12 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1008.76 W INV: 1003.92 SW/E 18' - 15" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 13 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1003.04 88' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% 88' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 14 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1002.16 47' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 15 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1001.69 66' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0%CBMH 16 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1001.03 90' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 17 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1000.13 80' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 18 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 999.33 N INV: 996.41 SE 33' - 18" RCP @ 2.0% CONNECT TO EX. CB INV: 995.75 +/- CBMH 20 RIM: 1015.8 INV: 1006.66 +/-CBMH 21 - SOLID CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1015.2 EX. INV: 1006.48 +/- CBMH 22 - BEEHIVE CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1007.9 EX. INV: 1003.26 +/- CBMH 23 CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP RIM: 1007.6 EX. INV: 1002.99 +/- CBMH 24 - SOLID CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1008.1 EX. INV: 1002.41 +/- 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE PIV CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN (VERIFY EXISTING SIZE & MATERIAL) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 6" GATE VALVE 8" GATE VALVE 300' HOSE REACH FOR FIRE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 8 : 2 7 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 4 - 1 U t i l i t y P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS UTILITY PLAN C4-1 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2013 EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 & SCH 40 6" TO 8" DIAMETER STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE 12" TO 15" DIAMETER 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12.CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON THE UTILITY PLAN. 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 14.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOIN.T 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO FINISH GRADE. 19.ALL CONNECTIONS TO SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CITY. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOUR PRIOR NOTICE. 20.RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. UTILITY NOTES WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! C ADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 9 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 8 - 1 D e t a i l S h e e t OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DETAIL SHEET C8-1 C ADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 7 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 8 - 1 D e t a i l S h e e t OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DETAIL SHEET C8-2 EXISTING BUILDING FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 BLS 4 TA 2 BLS 4 TA 2 BLS 4 TA 4 TA 3 BLS 2 BLS 4 TA 4 TA 4 TA 3 BLS 3 BLS 1 SSC 19 RGD 2 IH 7 WC 4 WC 3 WC 7 WC 5 WC 1 SGM 7 BAJ 5 FLM 5 FLM 2 QA 14 FG 30 PPJ 27 NSG 3 BS 10 BLS 10 BLS 10 TGA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 1 IH 8 RSD 5 BLS 9 AJS 5 RSD 5 RSD 2 PRC 4 TA 2 AD 4 TA 4 AD 12 SJ 6 AD 5 FLM 6 FG 9 SSD 4 SJ 8 SSD 11 FG 3 BS 1 SSC 1 SSC 1 PRC 3 SSC 3 SSC 2 SGM 1 SGM 4 SGM 3 BO 2 QA 2 AP 3 BO 3 AP 1 AB 1 AB 3 RM 14 RSD DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE AB 2 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze`B & B 2.5"Cal BO 6 BURR OAK Quercus macrocarpa B & B 2.5"Cal IH 3 IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Impcole` TM B & B 2.5"Cal QA 4 QUAKING ASPEN Populus tremuloides 25 gal RM 3 RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum `Franksred` TM B & B 2.5"Cal SGM 9 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen`B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE AP 5 AUSTRIAN PINE FULL FORM Pinus nigra B & B 6` HGT BS 7 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FULL FORM Picea glauca `Densata`B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE PRC 3 PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE Malus x `Prairie Rose`B & B 1.5"Cal SSC 7 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Malus x `Spring Snow`B & B 1.5"Cal SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING AD 12 ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea `Artic Fire`5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. BLS 59 BIRCH-LEAF SPIREA Spirea x betulifolia `Tor`5 gal 24" HGT 36" o.c. RGD 19 RED GNOME DOGWOOD Cornus alba sibirica `Red Gnome`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. GRASSES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING FG 31 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` 1 gal 24" o.c. FLM 15 FLAME MISCANTHUS Miscanthus sinensis `Purpurascens` 1 gal 48" o.c. NSG 27 NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS Panicum virgatum `North Wind`1 gal 30" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING BAJ 7 BLUE ARROW JUNIPER Juniperus virginiana `Blue Arrow`10 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. PPJ 30 PENCIL POINT JUNIPER Juniperus Communis 'Pencil Point' 10 gal 24" o.c. SJ 16 SCANDIA JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Scandia'5 gal 48" o.c. TGA 10 TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn'5 gal 42" o.c. TA 52 TECHNY GLOBE ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis `Techny Globe 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING AJS 9 AUTUMN JOY SEDUM Sedum x `Autumn Joy`1 gal 18" o.c. DWH 1 DREAM WEAVER HOSTA Hosta `Dream Weaver`1 gal 24" o.c. RSD 32 RUBY STELLA DAYLILY Hemerocallis x `Ruby Stella`1 gal 24" o.c. N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 1 2 : 1 8 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ L 1 - 1 L a n d s c a p e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Gregory A. Johnson - LA Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24610 19767 JAS GAJ GAJ 06-14-21 06-14-21 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1-1 IRRIGATION NOTES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED AND LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. IRRIGATION IS NOT NEEDED IN NATIVE SEEDED AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL NOT SPRAY ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTINGS AND SOD AREAS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. LANDSCAPE PLAN ROCK MULCH - 1-1/2" GREY TRAP ROCK 4" DEPTH ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE - $12,000,000 UNIT COSTLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SOD / TOPSOIL - SEE NOTES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE - 2.5" CAL PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE - 3" CAL PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE - 1.5" CAL (2 ORN = 1 CAN) PROPOSED SHRUBS GROUNDCOVER LEGEND PLANT LIST EDGING 27 12 10 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT - 1% OF $12,000,000 = $120,000 PROPOSED PERENNIALS / GRASSES 205 152 PROP EST COST $500 $450 $350 $60 $15 $13,500 $5,400 $3,500 $12,300 $2,280 PROPOSED SOD PROPOSED ROCK MULCH ED G I N G ED G I N G DOG RUN DOG PARK TOTAL LANDSCAPE COST OPINION 1,500 sy $25 $37,500 $3,000 $127,980 $120,000 PROPOSED GRAVEL PAVE $2,500 PROPOSED IRRIGATION $48,000 GRAVEL PAVE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT - 26,396 SF PROPOSEDTREE REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED CANOPY TREE - 2.5" CAL PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE - 3" CAL 27 12 REQUIRED 27 12 EXISTING SIGN 42" ORNAMENTAL FENCE - SEE L2-1 #### #### C ADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 1 2 : 1 9 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ L 1 - 1 L a n d s c a p e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Gregory A. Johnson - LA Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24610 19767 JAS GAJ GAJ 06-14-21 06-14-21 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2-1 LOUCKS Deciduous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2x ROOT BALL WIDTH CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) MULCH - 4" DEEP. NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE. SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. CUT BACK WIRE BASKET PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING1 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING LOUCKS Coniferous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. ROOT BALL SET ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. MULCH MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. 2 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. MULCH FOR TURF SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE TYPE 5 WOOD FIBER HYDROMULCH CONFORMING WITH MNDOT 3884. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS WITH SLOPES 15% OR GREATER SHALL BE MNDOT CATEGORY 1, STRAW RD 1S BLANKET CONFORMING WITH MNDOT 3885. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V-CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. COMMERCIAL GRADE 5" BLACK POLY EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH UNIFORM PIECE SIZE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECIEVE 3" OF MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP MULCH WTH A FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. ROCK MULCH SHALL BE 1"-1-1/2" GREY TRAP ROCK, 4" DEEP OVER A FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR. WARRANTY SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. VARIES SEE PLAN EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN MULCH - 3" MIN DEPTH - SEE NOTES LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING 12" DEPTH (MIN) LOAM PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES PERENNIAL PLANTING LOUCKS Perennial Planting.dwgSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" BU I L D I N G W A L L ( T Y P ) 4 REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. MULCH - 3" DEPTH - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING BU I L D I N G W A L L ( T Y P ) SHRUB PLANTING LOUCKS Shrub Planting.dwgSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"3 42" ORNAMENTAL FENCE - DELGARD LOUCKS 42INCH ORN FENCE - DELGARD.dwgSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2" SQUARE FENCE POST 3' - 8 " 6'-3/4" 4" 6" 1' - 6 " 3" MODEL: 42" ELBA RESIDENTIAL FENCE BY DELGARD (OR EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK 1-800-235-0185 WWW.DELGARD.COM 1" X 1" TOP AND MID RAIL 5/8" X 5/8" PICKET 1" X 1" BOTTOM RAIL GRADE EXISTING SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTING 5 SITE LOCATION AREA MAP CIVIL LOUCKS INC 7200 HEMLOCK LANE, SUITE 300, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 JEFF SHOPEK - PRINCIPAL 763-496-6715 JSHOPEK@LOUCKSINC.COM ARCHITECTURE/ INTERIOR DESIGN MOHAGEN HANSEN ARCHITECTURE | INTERIORS 1000 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200 WAYZATA, MN 55391 JENNIFER KAPLAN, AIA - PROJECT MANAGER 952-426-7421 JKAPLAN@MOHAGENHANSEN.COM PROJECT CONTACTS 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391 T: 952-426-7400 F: 952-426-7440 PR O J E C T CL I E N T PR O J E C T A D D R E S S DA T E PR O J E C T P H A S E PR O J . N O . MohagenHansen.com CB S - M N P R O P E R T I E S , L L C / 2 1 0 1 1 / C I T Y S U B M I T T A L / E A G L E R I D G E M U L T I - F A M I L Y CBS-MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575, LONG LAKE, MN 55356 EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY 05-19-2021 21011 CITY SUBMITTAL 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 NEW CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION 18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER: I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHARGED. CLIENT APPROVAL TITLE: AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF: UP DN UP A3001 A300 4 3'-4"20'-0" A300 5 18 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 3'-7 3/4"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0" 14 28 20 2 2 1 2 3 4 A300 2 UTLITY LOBBY ELEV. EQUIP STAIR 2 TRASH PARKING 66 STALLS STAIR 1 COMMUNITY SPACE: BIKES 441 SF DRIVE THRU DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N AR C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r _ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A200 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. 1/8" = 1'-0"A200 1 LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN UP DN UP A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 STAIR 1 UTILITY MAIL ROOM WC OFFICE VEST. 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 3 BED COMMUNITY SPACE: EXERCISE 930 SF STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED GARBAGE LOBBY DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A201 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 1 LEVEL 1 - FLOOR PLAN N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN UP UPDN A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 UTILITY WC 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 3 BED STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED GARBAGE STAIR 1 2 BED COMMUNITY: SITTING 243 SF CO M M U N I T Y SP A C E : B I K E S 18 7 S F DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A202 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/8" = 1'-0"A202 1 LEVEL 2 - FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN DN DN A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 2 BED 2 BED STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED STAIR 1 2 BED UTILITY WC 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 GARBAGE WC COMMUNITYSPACE: COMMUNITY ROOM 921 SF COMMUNITY SPACE: AMENITY DECK 745 SF ROOF COMMUNITY: SITTING 243 SF DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A203 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/8" = 1'-0"A203 1 LEVEL 3 - FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 W/D W/D W/ D W/D 30 ' - 7 3 / 4 " CL CL 26'-6" KITCHEN LAUNDRY CLOSET BATHROOM WALK-IN CLOSET BEDROOM LIVING 1 BEDROOM 797 S.F. OUTDOOR DECK HVAC ENTRY DINING KITCHEN DINING LIVING HVAC BEDROOM CLOSET LAUNDRY CLOSET BATHROOM ENTRY WALK-IN CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM OUTDOOR DECK CL CL 49'-6" 28 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 2 BEDROOM 1,397 S.F. 3 BEDROOM 1,781 S.F. CLOSET CLOSET LAUNDRY ENTRY KITCHEN WALK-IN CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH LIVING DINING CLOSET BEDROOM BATH BATH BEDROOM 27'-7 3/4" 67 ' - 3 1 / 2 " MASTER BEDROOM WALK-IN CLOST MASTER BATHROOM HALF BATH DEN LIVING DINING KITCHEN ENTRYCLOSET BATHROOM WALK-IN CLOSET LAUNDRY BDEROOM HVAC OUTDOOR DECK 2 BEDROOM LARGE 1,937 S.F. CLCL 68'-4 3/4" 28 ' - 7 3 / 4 " N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ s h a y e s @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A400 UNIT PLANS Checker Author 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 1 TYPICAL 1 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 2 TYPICAL 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 3 TYPICAL 3 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 4 TYPICAL 2 BEDROOM LARGE UNIT 26 UNITS 14 UNITS 6 UNITS 2 UNITS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE BRK-1 BRICK: STANDARD MODULAR COLOR: RED/BROWN EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND MTL-1 METAL PRE-FINISHED COPING AND TRIM: FIRESTONE UNICLAD COLOR: DARK BRONZE MTL-2 METAL RIBBED PANEL - FIRESTONE DELTA COLOR: DARK BRONZE MTL-3 METAL PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM PERGOLA FRAME AND LOUVERS: COLOR: DARK BRONZE 1. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES/ MULLIONS: DARK BRONZE 2. VENTING/ LOUVERS: DARK BRONZE 3. BALCONY METAL: DARK BRONZE, BALCONY METAL RAILING: DARK BRONZE, BALCONY RAILING SCREEN: CLEAR GLAZING 4. METAL PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES: DARK BRONZE 5. ALUMINUM PERGOLA: MTL-3 6. ARCHITECT TO BE PROVIDED WITH ALL SAMPLES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION TO REVIEW AND APPROVE. CSTN-1 CAST STONE: STONEWORKS COLOR: BUFF LIMESTONE ACM-1 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL: ALUCOBOND COLOR: DARK BRONZE LOWER LEVEL 89' - 4" B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 MTL-1 MTL-3 CSTN-1 MTL-2 PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER ACM-1 DECORATIVE BACKLIT METAL SIGNAGE: NATURAL LIGHT BRONZE DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES PERGOLA B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER LOWER LEVEL 89' - 4" B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-B 132' - 4" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER PERGOLA DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES MTL-3 GRADE BEYOND B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-B 132' - 4" BRK-1 MTL-1 CSTN-1 ACM-1PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE 3 A300 4A300 5 A300 1 A300 2 A300 B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER PERGOLA MTL-3 BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES MTL-2 BRK-1 CSTN-1 MTL-3 ACM-1 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS S.PAETZEL Author 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - NORTH 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - WEST 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 5 ELEVATION - EAST 2 1" = 40'-0"A300 6 KEYPLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - EAST NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A300A RENDERINGS S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 12" = 1'-0"A300A 1 RENDERING - ENTRY 12" = 1'-0"A300A 2 RENDERING - DRIVE UP NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 Page M of 1Project #:Date:6/10/2021Calculated light levels shown are estimates based on information available at time of layout request.Due to unknown site conditions JTH Lighting assumes no responsibility for installed light levels.1. Lighting Reflectance of 80/50/20 used unless no ted otherwise 2. Interior calc points shown at 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise 3. Exterior calc points shown at grade unless note d otherwise 4. Emergency egress calc points shown at 0" A.F.F.5. Photometric drawings are for Design purposes on ly, not for Construction documentsPaper Size: ARCH D - 24X36"MN, ND, SD, W. WI 6885 146TH ST W APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 952.223.6300 WWW.JTHLIGHTING.COM EAGLE RIDGE Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l Ca l c T y p e Un i t s Av g Ma x Mi n Av g / M i n Ma x / M i n LO T _ P l a n a r Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 1. 4 3 6. 4 0. 0 N. A . Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ma n u f a c t u r e r De s c r i p t i o n Ar r a n g e m e n t Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts LLF N. A . 2 AA AS L 1 - 1 6 0 L - 1 0 0 - 4 K 7 - 3 - U SI N G L E 12010 87.6 0.950 6 AA 2 AS L 2 - 3 2 0 L - 1 4 5 - 4 K 7 - 3 - U SI N G L E 20738 143 0.950 E L E E L E T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E LTEL T E L T E L TE L TE L TEL T E L T E L O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O u t l o t D S U G A R S A N M H R I M =1 0 0 1 .3 T O P =1 0 0 2 .9 O H O H (D I R C E T I O N A N D I N V E R T A R E U N K N O W N ) O u t l o t D EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G 1012 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 6 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 21010 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 6 101610141016101210101008 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 4 GF E - 1 0 0 7 . 5 FF E - 1 0 1 8 . 0 HC HC GF E - 1 0 0 7 . 5 FF E - 1 0 1 8 . 0 AA MH : 1 8 AA MH : 1 8 MH : 2 8 AA 2 AA 2 MH : 2 8 AA 2 MH : 2 8 MH : 2 8 AA 2 AA 2 MH : 2 8 AA 2 MH : 2 8 0. 3 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 5 2 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1 . 9 0.0 0. 6 0. 2 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 5 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 4. 1 1. 2 0. 7 0.0 1. 4 2 . 1 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 5 0. 1 0. 5 0. 1 1. 4 2 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 3 4 . 3 2 . 1 0 . 7 0.0 0. 4 3. 3 0. 2 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 9 4 . 1 0.0 3. 7 2. 7 3. 0 2 . 0 0 . 3 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 4. 2 0. 5 0.0 1. 9 2 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 2 1. 1 0. 7 2. 0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 0 4 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 3 0. 1 0. 7 0.0 2. 8 2 . 5 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0.0 0.0 3. 1 0.0 1. 7 2 . 6 4 . 0 4 . 1 3 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 8 0. 1 3. 8 0. 2 0. 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 3 4 . 7 2. 7 4. 4 2. 7 3. 2 2 . 7 2 . 7 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 5 2. 6 4. 8 4. 2 1. 9 1. 7 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 7 2 . 6 3 . 5 4 . 1 3. 0 4. 1 3. 5 4. 1 3 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 4. 3 4. 3 0. 7 0.0 3. 0 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 5 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 2 2. 3 1. 1 2. 3 0. 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 5 2 . 2 3 . 5 1. 6 1. 7 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0.0 0. 0 2. 8 3 . 1 2 . 9 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 5 2 . 0 0 . 5 0 . 2 2. 8 0.0 0. 0 2. 9 3 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 6 2 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0.0 2. 1 3 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 2 1 . 1 0. 1 0. 1 0.0 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 6 0. 0 0. 0 3. 6 4 . 1 4 . 8 4 . 5 2 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 1 0. 0 2. 4 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 9 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 7 4 . 5 4 . 4 0. 0 3. 9 3. 9 3 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 4 0. 1 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 8 3. 9 4. 2 3. 8 4. 1 4 . 7 4 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 4. 2 0. 0 2. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 7 0. 0 1. 6 2. 7 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 8 2. 8 3 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 6 4 . 5 4 . 5 2 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 2 0.0 3. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 3. 3 0. 1 2. 3 1 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 2. 4 0.0 1. 3 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0 . 0 2. 7 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 3 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 3. 4 4 . 8 4 . 5 3 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 5 0 . 1 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 4. 6 5 . 9 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 5 1 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 4 3 . 5 3 . 2 2 . 5 1 . 6 0 . 8 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 2. 7 3 . 9 3 . 7 2 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 4 3. 4 0. 4 0.0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 0 0.0 0. 6 0. 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0. 0 0. 5 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 7 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 2. 4 2 . 8 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 1 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 9 5. 2 0. 1 0. 9 2. 8 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 1 . 6 2 . 0 0.0 1. 4 0. 0 0. 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 9 1. 0 4. 6 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 6 5. 0 1. 5 3. 9 0. 6 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 8 2 . 9 4 . 2 0.0 2. 1 1. 0 2. 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 5. 4 0.0 5. 0 2. 0 3 . 0 3 . 7 4 . 0 3 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 9 4. 6 0.0 5. 0 2. 2 3 . 5 4 . 9 5 . 2 5 . 0 4 . 5 3 . 9 3 . 4 3 . 5 4. 8 4. 6 0.0 5. 1 4 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 1 3 . 0 3 . 1 3 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 2 3. 9 3. 5 3. 8 3 . 4 3 . 5 4 . 0 4 . 9 5 . 8 6 . 0 5 . 4 4 . 4 3 . 7 0.0 3. 3 0.0 3. 6 3 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 9 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 3. 3 2. 0 2. 3 1 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 4 3 . 7 2. 1 3. 0 4. 5 1. 1 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 3 3 . 4 2 . 7 3. 9 5. 3 6. 4 5 . 6 4 . 0 2 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 5 5. 7 4. 6 3. 9 2 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 2 0. 4 4. 5 0.0 1. 8 0.0 2. 8 3 . 4 3 . 1 2 . 3 1 . 5 0 . 9 0 . 4 0 . 1 0.00.0 0. 1 2. 5 2 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 1 1 . 3 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 2 3 . 3 2 . 6 1 . 7 0.0 0. 4 1. 0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 5 3 . 4 3 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 4 0. 9 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. Adopt a summary ordinance for publication. 2. Background. On July 26th, the City Council approved ordinance 259, related to dock licensing on Big Island. An ordinance is effective upon its passage and publication. In instances where the ordinance is lengthy, the City Council may adopt a summary of the ordinance to be published. Staff has prepared a draft summary ordinance for that purpose. 3. Public Comment. No comments for or against the proposed summary ordinance been received. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council adopt the Ordinance as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the ordinance and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Summary Ordinance draft Item No.: 12 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000040 – City of Orono Text Amendment Related to Dock Licensing – Summary Ordinance No. 260, Third Series Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. _____, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING A DOCK LICENSING PROGRAM FOR USING DOCKS INSTALLED ON CITY RIGHT OF WAY ON BIG ISLAND NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 26, 2021, Ordinance 259, Third Series was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No.259, Third Series, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the Council amends Chapter 38 of the Orono City Code regarding regulations pertaining to docks on the right of way on Big Island. The Ordinance establishes a program for the city to issue licenses for the use of public docks installed on public rights of way on Big Island for inland lot of record owners. The full ordinance is available for review at the Orono City Hall during normal business hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 9th day of August, 2021. ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Summary Ordinance published in The Laker Pioneer newspaper the week of ________, 2021. AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. To consider a resolution approving amendment #6 of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Background. The Comprehensive Plan identifies several different land uses for specific areas of the community. The Metropolitan Council identifies certain goals (growth, affordable housing, and density) for Orono, our ability to meet these goals are based on the lowest of a prescribed density range for the given area. In the development of certain parcels, the City Council had found that reducing density below the lowest range could have negative consequences on Orono’s goals within the Comprehensive Plan. For example, the Orono Crossing’s project was required to have 37 units to maintain the 10 units per acre guided for the property. Re-guiding the project to the next lower land use category would have had negative impacts on the affordable housing and density calculations. In May, the City Council directed staff to prepare a comprehensive plan amendment to more appropriately guide land use densities in certain areas of the city by introducing interim land use categories. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On July 19th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to approve the proposed amendment. The members of the Commission were in agreement that the proposal was appropriate and did not negatively impact the city and its land use obligations. 4. Public Comment. Minnetonka Beach has provided comment. No other comments in support or opposition have been received. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council adopt the resolution. Upon approval, staff will submit the application to the Met Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Draft changes to Chapter 3B C. PC Staff report D. PC Minutes E. Land Use Map F. Summary Table 3B-4 G. Minnetonka Beach Comment References Orono Comprehensive Plan File LA21-000046 Item No.: 14 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000046 – City of Orono – Comprehensive Plan Amendment #6 – Resolution No. 7210 Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #6 TO ADD A NEW LAND USE CATEGORY AND MODIFY THE NAME AND DENSITY RANGES OF EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES (FILE NO. LA21-000046) WHEREAS, the City of Orono (City) adopted it’s Comprehensive Plan “Plan” on June 10, 2019; WHEREAS, in the implementation of the Plan, the City desires to adjust land use density within the city to more appropriately serve the neighborhood and the Council’s land use goals; WHEREAS, on May 10, 2021, the City Council directed staff to initiate an amendment to the Comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the Comprehensive Plan Amendment were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on one or more of the following findings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File LA21-000046 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment). The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. Council Exhibit A LA21-46 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 2 2. There is a need to add and modify the guided land use density ranges between Urban Medium Density (3-10 u/a), Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use (10-20 u/a), and Urban High Density (10-20 u/a). 3. To introduce interim uses within these ranges in a logical manner, some modifications of existing land use names was necessary, including adding a new Urban Medium High category and renaming Urban Low to Urban Estate. 4. The changes proposed do not reduce from the required 154 units of affordable housing, based on the number of acres guided for densities 8 units per acre or greater. (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B-3) 5. The changes proposed include a density of 3.2 units per acre over the sewered areas, over the minimum density of 3.0 units per acre required for Emerging Suburban Edge communities, as designated by the Metropolitan Council (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B- 5). 6. The changes proposed meet the prescribed housing growth for the periods 2021-2030 and 2031-2040 (Comprehensive Plan Table 3B-6.) CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: I. Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants approval of an Amendment to the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the changes attached as Exhibit A and directs staff to submit same to the Metropolitan Council for approval. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of August, 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3B GENERAL LAND USE PLAN Introduction 3B-2 Scope 3B-3 Basic Land Use Concepts and Principles 3B-3 Table 3B-1: Orono Population and Households 1970-2040 3B-4 Table 3B-1a: Orono Populations and HH adjusted 3B-5 Land Use Goals and Policies 3B-6 2040 Regional Development Framework 3B-12 Existing and Future Land Use Summary 3B-13 Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary 3B-13 Table 3B-3: Orono 2040 Planned Land Use 3B-14 Navarre Area Plan 3B-18 What Changed 3B-21 Future Development/ Staged Plan 3B-21 Table 3B-4: Planned Development Sites 3B-22 Table 3B-5: Net Density 3B-24 Table 3B-6: Planned Development by Decade 3B-24 Employment 3B-25 Figure 3B-1 Employment 3B-25 Figure 3B-2 Employment by Industry 3B-25 Historic Site Preservation Plan 3B-26 Appendices Map 3B-1 Urban and Rural Areas Map 3B-2 Existing Land Use Map 3B-2B Existing Land Use-Navarre Area Map 3B-3 Proposed Land Use Map 3B-3B Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Map 3B-4 Planned Development Sites 3B-A Navarre Area Plan Council Exhibit B LA21-46 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 2 CMP PART 3B LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION This Land Use Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practices of Orono citizens. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues the basic land use concepts developed by Orono Township in 1950 and it conforms to the goals established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. The Land Use Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials, City staff, and other parties involved in land development and growth management in Orono. Orono's land use plan indicates the basic location, density and types of land uses in the City that are considered to be compatible with environmental conditions and beneficial to the long term health, safety and welfare of the City and its citizens alike. 2. The Land Use Plan is intended to be a guide for future development so as to reinforce our environmental protection commitment and to ensure such development will be consistent with existing land use. This Plan is compatible with the plans of nearby cities for land use of abutting neighborhoods and for overall levels of services and facilities. 3. The Land Use Plan is intended to advise the Metropolitan Council and our municipal neighbors of Orono's planning and growth management programs. The Land Use Plan illustrates and coordinates the various goals and policies of all the elements of the Community Management Plan. 4. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a basis for public facilities planning. The Land Use Plan plays an important role in determining each neighborhood's ultimate population, the required capacity of public facilities, and an appropriate capital improvements program. 5. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as the basis for developing responsible ordinances for land use management. Zoning and subdivision controls have been established and will continue to be refined to implement the intent of this Land Use Plan. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 3 SCOPE The time framework of the Land Use Plan is intended to be consistent with the regional planning period of 2020 through 2040 and with the City's permanent planning policy for rural Orono. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan and no expansion of the existing urban service area. This commitment is particularly important to the many Orono citizens who are making private investments based upon this concept. BASIC LAND USE CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES Orono's planning programs have long recognized the development paradox, or urbanization spiral, which often results from arbitrary planning assumptions or from incomplete analysis of planning alternatives. The most striking example in Orono's situation is the documented evidence that over- extension of sanitary sewers, ostensibly to solve a pollution problem, can easily in itself cause irretrievable water quality degradation of Lake Minnetonka. Chapter 1 of this Plan outlines the “urbanization spiral”. Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds, alum treatments, and a wide variety of Best Management Practices provide added tools to manage runoff from rural densities. However, Orono cannot and will not rely solely on man- made systems for preserving water quality, and will not increase density to pay for stormwater management infrastructure. A principal goal of Orono's planning program is the protection of natural resources and environmental amenities, particularly the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake Minnetonka. Retention of natural vegetation, light, air, and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion and alteration. Water quality preservation is dependent upon effective sewage treatment programs. Urbanized areas, shoreland areas and remaining existing higher-density housing clusters within the Rural area have been or will be provided with municipal sanitary sewer to prevent discharge of untreated or insufficiently treated sewage effluent into the Lake. In the rural areas, low density land use can be safely served long- term by individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. These two development patterns offer a variety of housing to meet residents’ lifestyle and service desires. The citizens of Orono have determined that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, and with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area. Orono is partly in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and partly outside the current MUSA. The MUSA was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. Urban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require, and to financially support, municipal sewer and water CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 4 services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreat ional facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas have limited density and have environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have new residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the Community Management Plan. Additional of higher density housing is anticipated in the planning term to accommodate a wider range of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively low. The rural area is expected to have continued infill residential development. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and development objectives of Orono. Community leaders have consistently held firm to the quality over quantity in approving development proposals, and will continue to do so. The projected population is a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Table 3B-1 illustrates Orono Population and Household growth, from 1970, projected through 2040. The most recent data supplied by the Met Council, in 2016, shows 7,691 people in 3,037 households. Table 3B-1: Orono Population, Households, and Employment 1970 - 2040 Amendments 1-6 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,834 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,603 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,437 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,306 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,029 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,335 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 5 Table 3B-1a illustrates the number of households need to be created based on the 2016 updated numbers. In summary, the city will need to add 523 sewered households to meet 2030 projections, and 340 households in the 2030s to meet 2040 forecasts. Table 3B-1a: Orono Households 2010 - 2040 Amendments 1-6 (Sewered and Unsewered adjusted Forecasts) Household Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. Change from 2016 2030 Est. Change from 2020 2040 Est Change from 2030 Sewered 1780 2253 2306 53 2,498 192 2,785 287 Unsewered 1046 784 1029 245 1105 76 1,113 8 Total City 2,146 3037 3,335 298 3,560 225 3,900 340 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on Highway 12 through Orono and Long Lake. Environmental and social pressures have eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 15 along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans were revised three decades ago in response to Orono’s plans for low-density development. The final Orono-Long Lake Interceptor is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent with Orono's goals for the rural area. Orono's commercial and economic development has always been centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been met by commercial facilities and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. New urban housing will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family, attached townhome, and apartment dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels along Wayzata Boulevard and in the Navarre Area. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry-buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required by urban and rural CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 6 neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area. Orono's transportation plan is tailored to the different needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. Near the lakeshore and in some rural areas, the collector roads are relatively slow speed with circuitous alignment dictated by the hills and bays rather than by commuter preference. The urban areas are provided with a typical network of city streets connecting residential and shopping areas with each other. The rural area is gridded-off with a core system of publicly maintained collector and minor arterial streets running at regular intervals. Orono's parks and open space facilities reflect different urban and rural characteristics. In the urban area, the City provides numerous small neighborhood parks and playgrounds offering centers for neighborhood activities such as swimming, skating, softball, and soccer. In addition, three larger preserves (Casco Circle, Saga Hill, and Highwood) offer substantial "natural" areas. In the rural area, a variety of City-owned parks and preserves offer a range of active and passive recreation opportunities. Large public and quasi-public recreational facilities include Three Rivers Park District lands, several golf courses, a gun club, the Luce Line state Trail, the Dakota Rail Trail, as well as two 'big woods' Scientific and Natural Areas. LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Land Use Plan is based upon the following goals and policies which in turn have been actively developed and fostered by Orono residents over the last 45 years. Land Use Goals 1. To reinforce Orono's environmental protection commitment, with special emphasis on the protection of Lake Minnetonka and Orono’s other lakes. 2. To maintain the historic identity and character of the separate urban and rural neighborhoods. 3. To provide appropriate places for a variety of local residential, educational, recreational, industrial and neighborhood commercial activities. 4. To protect neighborhoods from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 5. To coordinate Orono's land uses with that of neighboring communities. 6. To coordinate land uses and developed density with the financial and physical capabilities of the City. General Land Use Policies 1. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural Areas is fixed. Orono's Urban Area will not be strictly defined by the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary or future expansions of the MUSA boundary but will be fixed by this and the other elements of the Community Management Plan. Orono’s defined Urban and Rural Areas are best described by CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 7 the planned development types and densities. Orono’s Urban and Rural areas are depicted and fixed by Map 3B-1. 2. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) will define the areas of Orono where municipal sewers may be extended. The MUSA will include all parts of Orono's Urban Area and may include parts of Orono's Rural Area where appropriate. The MUSA boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not strictly define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 3. Orono's land use plans will be based upon environmental protection policies. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. 4. Development density will be limited throughout the city to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. Urbanization increases the rate and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. To the extent that it is practical and feasible, the City will supplement existing natural assimilation capacities with man- made ponding areas, but will not allow increases in development density beyond the defined density as a result of such supplementation. 5. The wetlands, floodplains, and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as an economically practical and effective method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. The city will not support the filling of a wetland to provide a buildable lot. 6. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with Orono's Shoreland Management regulations, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. 7. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to limit surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. Where determined to be feasible and practical, alternative natural methods of shoreline protection other than rip-rap will be promoted. Excavation, filling and other grade changes at or near the shoreline for the sole purpose of accommodating development will be discouraged. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 8 8. The City will work to encourage and facilitate slope stabilization measures prior to slope failures. 9. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. The City will observe and administer Flood Plain regulations as required by the DNR. 10. Orono's land use plan will promote the preservation of open space, light and air. Sufficient open spaces will be provided in each neighborhood and on each lot to prevent overcrowding and to ensure adequate light, air and recreation for all residents. 11. Private ownership, maintenance and stewardship of the land, including open space and many types of improvements, is favored over public ownership as being in the best and most beneficial interests of the property owner and the public, providing for more intimate, responsive and economical land management. 12. No land owner should be denied the right to develop his land by any staged growth, land banking or no-growth policy, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. 13. Future development must enhance the community. Land development should respect preserve the value of the land and the integrity, stability and beauty of the community. 14. Physical improvements required to accommodate new development must be provided by the developer. It is the policy of the City that development pays for itself, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to development In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configurations, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. All physical improvements must conform to city standards. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform, City-established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. Developers must dedicate lands required for public use. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, trails, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. If the individual development's property is not conducive to public land dedication, then in lieu of lands the developer may be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase of such CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 9 lands or the improvement of such facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase from multiple small developments. 17. No land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Urban Land Use Policies 1. The majority of Orono's urban area will be reserved for residential land use. Many urban residences will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive environmental conditions. Medium and High Density multi- family residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation services, but will not be appropriate within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka except when in close proximity to the Navarre commercial area abutting CR 15 or CR 19. 2. Commercial areas will be provided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercial areas will be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature (i.e. “big box” retail) which would increase traffic, particularly on collector streets serving low density residential development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial Development is targeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas will be provided for public access and limited lake -user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishing supplies, boat service and boat repair facilities which are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. 4. The City will encourage private unification and coordination of the existing commercial areas. Unplanned strip commercial developments will be discouraged. Coordinated projects designed to aesthetically enhance, unify and identify the business areas will be encouraged. 5. Future industrial development will be limited to the area of the existing Orono industrial park. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is consistent CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 10 with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. 6. Commercial and industrial development will not be permitted to adversely affect neighboring residential property. The location, scale and types of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach upon or adversely impact the primary residential land uses in Orono. Wherever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. Public urban services must be available for all future commercial, industrial and urban- residential development. Commercial, industrial and urban-density residential uses will be permitted only where municipal sanitary sewer, water, adequate transportation, police and fire protection services are available. 8. Urban development will utilize the capacity of existing public facilities. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. 9. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City regulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 10. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Rural Land Use Policies Orono's rural area will be reserved for permanent low-density residential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs. marshland assimilative capacity precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low- density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. Orono's rural area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses, orchards, small hobby farms, riding stables, and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 11 Rural density is limited by natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, factors which influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. The existing rural area will not be urbanized. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. Rural development will be subject to proven on-site sewage treatment capability. Future development in the rural area will be contingent upon the developer providing prior technical evidence that the site contains sufficient suitable land for all development, an acceptable primary drainfield area, and reserved space for at least one alternate drainfield area. The zoning area requirements for rural Orono will therefore be based upon minimum areas of dry, buildable, contiguous land exclusive of roadways, wetlands, streams or areas of high water table. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate home-sites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our wildlife. Public open space will be provided on a large-scale or Park Reserve basis, but neighborhood or mini-parks are unnecessary because of the large amount of available privately owned and maintained open space. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shoreland and within the MUSA will be provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Municipal sewer service connections will be available to new or existing residences within the designated Shoreland Overlay District and within the MUSA when requested, costs to connect will be the responsibility of the property owner. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Lakeshore Residential Land Use Policies Although Orono’s lakeshore has a wide range of diversity in lot size and home size, the predominant character of Orono’s lakeshore is natural. Natural is defined in part by much of the lakeshore being historically developed as large estate lots with homes set back a substantial distance from the lakeshore, or being developed as moderate homes on moderate lots leaving substantial open space. Natural includes remnants of native forests and vegetation, protection of the lakeshore from hardcover and impervious surface encroachments. The exception to the natural lakeshore is the areas where historically small cottages were built on small lots close to the lakeshore. These cottages in many cases have been updated, remodeled or expanded into year- round homes. The key goal of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to protect Lake Minnetonka, and other Orono CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 12 lakes and waterways which includes the preservation of the natural character of the lakeshore and the water quality of the lakes. As the demand for, and value of, lakeshore property has dramatically increased, so has the pressure to expand or replace older homes with much larger homes. This pressure has the potential to substantially alter the natural character of the lakeshore, and the more open and natural environment enjoyed by property owners along much of the lakeshore in Orono. The following policies will guide the City in addressing development on the lakeshore. 1. Lake Minnetonka shall be protected as a natural and recreational resource. 2. The natural character of the lakeshore shall be preserved, and when possible, enhanced. 3. The views and open space currently enjoyed by lakeshore property owners shall be reasonably protected. 4. The size of a house to be allowed on a lot shall be determined, in part, based on the size of the lot, as well as on the shape and topography of the lot. 5. The increase in massing of structures on the lakeshore shall be limited. 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2015 adopted “Thrive MSP 2040” to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommoda ting expected growth in the region. Forecasts indicate the metro area will grow by 820,000 people between 2010 and 2040, and as the average household size continues to shrink (from 2.55 in 2010 to 2.43 by 2040) an additional 389,000 households must be accommodated. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a “one size fits all” approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. In general, Orono’s area within the MUSA boundary is designated as “Emerging Suburban Edge” and the areas outside the MUSA boundary are “Rural Residential”. Metropolitan Council has identified a set of implementatio n strategies for each of these categories, as well as an umbrella of strategies that will apply to all communities. Map 3C-1 outlines the Community Designations and the community responsibilities. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2021-2030. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7-county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element is a housing implementation program, “…including CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 13 official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing.” Orono’s share is forecasted at 154 new affordable housing units for the decade 2021- 2030. EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE SUMMARY Map 3B-2 depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2016. Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary, shows just over 1/3 of Orono’s total area is in open water; of the remaining 2/3 that is land area, 92% is devoted to residential, parks & open space uses, or underdeveloped. Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary (2016) Land Use Category Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 302 1.97% Rural Residential 2,098 13.66% Island Residential 76 0.49% Urban Low Density Residential 2,441 15.90% Urban Medium Density Residential 32 0.21% Urban High Density Residential 21 0.14% Commercial/ Office 86 0.56% Industrial 35 0.23% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1,529 9.96% Undeveloped 3367 21.93% Right-of-Way 137 TOTAL 15,356 65% Source: Existing Land Use Map Note: Open Water is a dominant natural feature of Orono and represents 34.03 percent of the “land” area of Orono. However, because it is not a land use, it is not included in Table 3B-2 above or on Map 3B-2a. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 14 Map 3B-3 indicates the proposed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use map will form the basis for land use and zoning decisions over the next 20 years. Table 3B-3 is a summary of Orono’s Planned Land Use. Note that the Summary reflects that the planned uses are to be allowed to take effect immediately rather than being staged over a period of years, thus the 2030 and 2040 predicted acreages are the same as 2020 levels. The Plan does not suggest a change in land use over the next 20 years, after the adoption of this Update. The land uses identified in Map3B-3a and Map 3B-3b are outlined in greater detail below. 1. Lakes and Open Water Areas within the city boundary of open water. The Lakes and associated watersheds are a significant influence on the quality of life and character of the City. However, since they are not a land use, they are not included in the land use calculations for the city. Open water constitutes approximately 34% of the surface area of the City. 2. Rural Preserve (1 unit per 5 acres) The northwest corner of the City is planned for a lower density of one unit per five acres. This area has been developed to provide large lot and quasi agricultural home sites. The extension of municipal water or sewer is not intended for these areas. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. 3. Rural Residential (1 unit per 2 acres) This is the typical rural residential density developed and planned to be permanently self -supporting. No rural density will be allowed greater than one unit per two acres except for those residences in existing rural housing clusters that were originally developed many decades ago and in most cases have been provided with municipal sewer within the past 3 decades. New rural developments may include housing clustering when environmental and site conditions allow, provided the overall density within the development conforms to these requirements, and provided that all sewage treatment needs can be adequately met within. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached Land Use Category 2020 Acreage % of City 2030 Acreage % of City 2040 Acreage % of City Rural Preserve (1 unit / 5 acres)1207 8.39%1207 8.39%1207 8.39% Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres)2808 19.52%2808 19.52%2808 19.52% Island Residential 55 0.38%55 0.38%55 0.38% Urban Estate Density Residential (0.5 – 2 units /acre)3177 22.08%3177 22.08%3177 22.08% Urban Low Density Residential (3 -8 units/ acre)165 1.15%165 1.15%165 1.15% Urban Med-High Residential/Mixed Use (8 –15 units / acre)86 0.60%86 0.60%86 0.60% Urban Medium High Density Residential (15 -20 units per acre)3 0.02%3 0.02%3 0.02% Urban High Density Residential (20 -25 units per acre)51 0.35%51 0.35%51 0.35% Commercial/ Office 46 0.32%46 0.32%46 0.32% Industrial 42 0.29%42 0.29%42 0.29% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1570 10.91%1570 10.91%1570 10.91% TOTAL 9,210 64%9,210 64%9,210 64% Table 3B-3: Orono Planned Land Use Summary Source: Proposed Land Use Map Percentages based on total city area, including 6014 acres of open water and Highway rights of way CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 15 structures. 4. Urban Estate Low Residential (0.5-2 units per acre) This is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of lots developed many decades ago smaller than 1 acre, and have access to sanitary sewer services. These lots have a particular impact on lake water quality, and lake character and storm water management, massing, and hardcover controls are critical to the retention of this character. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. 5. Urban Low Medium Residential (3- 8 10 units per acre) This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely situated that residential development at the prescribed density will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single and two family structures. 6. Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential ( 8-15 10-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. The Mixed Use Residential designation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residential. This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near-by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi -family residential development such as senior and assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher-density residential use or mixed residential-commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects. The Metropolitan Council requires that communities provide a measurement of forecasted employment. Acceptable measures include floor area ratios, building footprint percentages or impervious surface percentages. The City anticipates mixed use within the context of the neighborhood, and not necessarily specific to a particular parcel. Where employed, the City can envision ground level commercial services, with 2nd and 3rd level residential, though that is not the expected universal development pattern. The employment and service centers in Orono are very suburban in nature, equating to low Floor Area Ratios (FAR). The City anticipates development and redevelopment of its employment and service centers to continue that development pattern, given the City’s goals toward open space, stormwater management, and relatively modest building scale. The City anticipates its commercial and mixed use areas to be driven by retail and service industries, with a corresponding FAR between 0.2 and 0.35. Properties in Area E of Table 3B-4 and Map 3B-4 are the primary candidates for mixed use CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 16 development. The City has identified 48 51 net acres of properties that could be developed or redeveloped in the next 20 years. Based on the height limit (30 feet) and the desire for commercial services to mix with residential, the City anticipates 70% of Area E to convert to residential uses, the remaining 30% to Commercial. Assuming a FAR ratio of 0.25 to 0.45, there is the potential of 418,000 and 731,000 sq ft of building area. Assuming up to a third of that being used for Commercial purposes, that nets between 125,400 and 219,500 sq ft of commercial space, primarily in Area E. Total Sq Ft (Total SF * FAR) 1/3 of area for Commercial Jobs, Assuming 1000 sqft per worker FAR 0.25 522,720 172,498 172 FAR 0.45 940,896 310,496 310 Applying the Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey findings*, in particular the median square feet per worker, we can extrapolate a conservative estimate of 1000 sq ft per worker, based on likely retail, office or service employment, census region, climate, and number of floors. This yields a range of potential employment of between 172 and 310 workers in Area E alone. * Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey completed by the US Energy Information Administration, updated December, 2016 7. Urban Medium High Density Residential (15-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects, but not appropriate for the highest densities. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the abili ty of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units are anticipated to be provided as 3-5 unit townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and senior housing structures, no higher than 30 feet in defined height. 8. Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units are anticipated to be provided as 4 unit townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and senior housing structures, no higher than 30 feet in defined height. 9. Island Residential (1 unit per 5 acres) The Island residential is characterized by limited access, utilities, and municipal services for properties originally developed as seasonal cabins. The Land use category is intended to preserve this land use without encouraging additional subdivision. This area is envisioned for seasonal occupancy in single family detached structures. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 17 10. Commercial/ Office Commercial/ Office is the general land use describing 3 sub land use categories: Lakeshore Commercial, Navarre Commercial District, and Orono/ Long Lake Business District. Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL Lakeshore Commercial, restricted to lake access and lake user service businesses, including marinas, are appropriate for a lakeside community and require a lakeshore location. Special performance standards are necessary to assure protection of the lake environment. Parking, utilities, lake/ Highway access, and pedestrian circulation must be considered in siting new Lake Shore Commercial Uses. NAVARRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See also Urban Medium High Density Residential/ Mixed Use. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be Navarre. This area will provide opportunity for neighborhood retail and service businesses, plus professional offices. Accessory functions such as offices and living units or limited multi-family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian-friendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in Navarre to allow for an expanded range of neighborhood services and local small business opportunities. The Navarre Commercial District extends along either side of Shoreline Drive from the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 westward to the Orono-Spring Park border, and along both sides of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue to Lydiard Avenue. The commercial uses along these intersecting corridors are typically only one tier deep, with virtually all commercial properties abutting either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Additionally, the commercial properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among them, making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential. Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identified a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to come: 1. High traffic volumes and the existing traffic management infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestrians have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cross CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2. Parking availability is a limiting factor for expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3. Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as financial constraints. 4. Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 18 businesses to survive and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5. There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. 6. Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighborhood can become an issue. 7. Desire to expand pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8. Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE BUSINESS AREA An additional commercial area is designated along Wayzata Boulevard where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than “big box‟ regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally-owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian-friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. Parameters for commercial use of this area are as follows: 1. The area affected is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, west of Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. Allowed uses in this area include professional offices, limited service uses, retail uses accessory to the office use, and senior and assisted living uses. 3. Access to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway. Direct access to Wil low Drive, if allowed, are intended to be right-in/right-out only. There shall be no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 19 4. “Big box” retail uses will not be allowed within this area. 9. Park/ Recreation/ Open Space Park, Recreation, and Open Space Land Use includes public and private parks and natural areas throughout the community. The recreational facilities identified on the Land Use Plan are principally large natural or open space areas which are compatible with their Rural Area location. 10. Industrial This district provides space for industrial activities for companies that are able and willing to achieve superior standards of design and environmental protection. Industrial land uses should be restricted to areas abutting major transportation corridors and individually cited so as to minimum negative impacts on residential areas. Based on their heavy hardcover needs, industrial areas should be located further than 1,000 feet from lakes. The Metropolitan Council requires that communities provide a measurement of forecasted employment. Acceptable measures include floor area ratios, building footprint percentages or impervious surface percentages. Orono anticipates that new development in the Industrial land use will tend to result in FAR of 0.32 to 0.4. There is about 10 acres of vacant or underdeveloped industrially guided property. Applying the same methodology as outlined in the Mixed Use section: Total Sq Ft (Total SF * FAR) Jobs, Assuming 1500 sqft per warehouse worker FAR 0.32 139,392 93 FAR 0.40 174,240 116 The City can anticipate an additional 93 -116 jobs upon the full buildout of the Industrial areas. These two areas, using the conservative estimates outlines, demonstrate Orono can accommodate employment growth projections. 11. Major Highway and Railway Uses Identifies land occupied by federal or state highways and railway improvements. NAVARRE AREA PLAN In 2018, the City completed the Navarre Area Plan (NAP) with the aid of a Planning Consultant, WSB and Associates. This planning process focused on the land range vision and land use goals for the Navarre area, and to inform the Comprehensive Plan, for this update. The proposed land uses shown on Map 3B- 3 include the findings from the Navarre Area Plan. Map 3B-3a shows the Navarre area specifically. The Navarre Planning Process employed a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), consisting of 13 members of the Navarre area community, including business owners and operators and residents. The Planning Process included three PAC meetings, an open house in January, and a Joint Work session in April. Public comment was collected via the open house, work session, on-line surveys, and the use of a social media tool, Social Pinpoint. The full report, including the appendices detailing the comments received, and the market study, are attached in Appendix 3B-A of this chapter. The NAP evaluated several factors influencing the changes in the Navarre neighborhood over the next 20 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 20 years, including the market, traffic and transportation. The goal of the PAC was to influence and guide this change toward a Navarre area that can serve as a pseudo “downtown” of Orono, while still respecting the core Orono values as a small, rural community. A market study was completed by Maxfield and Associates, tested the land use assumptions made by the land use plan. The market study was used to adjust the planned land use map from the 2030 to the 2040 Plan. Traffic and transportation issues are a major influence on the character and change in Navarre. In 2019, Hennepin County is expected to improve the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 (Shoreline and Shadywood Road), though these improvements are not expected to increase capacity. Capacity challenges of this section of the community are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The findings of the Navarre Area Plan are highlighted below. Interaction with Lake Minnetonka As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, the City should work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. Future Development Cautiously consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development. Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas. Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, façade articulation, and entryways. Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw. Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking. Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses. Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles. Consider developing a façade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 21 Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features. Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. Shadywood Trail Connection Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward. Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required. Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events Encourage the development of a community festival. Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail. Utilize the city-owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event. Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival. Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre. Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers’ market to organize a farmers’ market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre. Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Tear Downs Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 22 redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures. Proactively address blighted properties through the City’s code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City’s code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. WHATS CHANGED This update of the Comprehensive Plan introduces higher residential density along Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, lowers density for the properties adjacent to the fire station on Willow, removes residential mixed use density along Shadywood, and introduces additional properties to potential mixed use development/ redevelopment along Shoreline in Navarre. These changes are all reflected on maps 3B-3a and 3B-3b. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT/ STAGED DEVELOPMENT The City does not intend to establish a staged growth plan, limiting a property owner from the use of their land, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. The City anticipates its growth to occur in the same manner has been employed over the last three decades. The majority of subdivision based growth will occur via the splitting of larger lots into subdivisions of less than 6 new building sites. Small areas of the community are conducive to higher density. These projects have served to accommodate our aging community, and provide additional housing and neighborhood options not prevalent in Orono. The City’s new residential growth within the MUSA area is expected in one of 5 primary areas, depicted on Map 3B-4 Planned Development areas, and summarized in Table 3B-4, Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas. The table predicts growth over the next 2 decades and identifies the MUSA part and the Traffic Analysis Zone impacted. Assuming development at the minimum range, the city will meet its household growth projection for 2030 and 2040. The city also maintains opportunity for property owners to provide housing to meet affordability goals. The Net Density for the sewered areas of Orono identified in Table 3B-4, is summarized for clarity on Table 3B-5. The 763 891 units planned to be served by sanitary sewer services over the next 20 plus years yields a net density of 3.21 4.16 units per acre. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 23 A B C D E F G H I 1 2 Dumas Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)25.1 8 200.8 200.8 32 921 3 Eisinger Meadows Urban Low (3-8 u/a)5 3 15 15 4 Eisinger Flats Urban High (20-25 u/a)10 20 200 200 50 921 5 40.1 415.8 215 200.8 6 7 "St. Thomas Prop"Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)3.69 8 29.52 29.52 0 10 922 8 2060 Wayzata Urban Medium High (15-20 u/a)2.51 15 37.65 37.65 10 923 9 6.2 67.17 67.17 0 10 Area C, North Fire Station Area 11 Hwy 12 frontage Urban Low (3-8 u/a)1.71 3 5.13 5.13 34 929 12 Garden Prop.Urban Low (3-8 u/a)3.41 3 10.23 10.23 34 929 13 Glendale Drive Urban Low (3-8 u/a)3.82 3 11.46 11.46 34 929 14 8.94 26.82 0 26.82 15 Area D (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) Urban Low Density 16 690 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)18 0.5 9 9 40 927 17 740 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 40 927 18 3400 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.26 0.5 2 2 31 954 19 3295 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.23 0.5 2 2 31 931 20 3345 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.69 0.5 2 2 31 931 21 3350 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.12 0.5 3 3 31 954 22 3320 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.06 0.5 1 1 31 954 23 3300 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.55 0.5 2 2 31 954 24 3280 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.95 0.5 2 2 31 954 25 3250 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.31 0.5 2 2 31 954 26 3200 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.12 0.5 2 2 31 954 27 3175 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.49 0.5 3 3 31 954 28 3125 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.44 0.5 3 3 31 954 29 825 Old Crystal Bay Road Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)17.61 0.5 8 8 31 954 30 1700 Shoreline Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)20.14 0.5 10 10 37 955 31 1100 Millston Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)12.7 0.5 6 6 37 955 32 1003 Wildhurst Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)10 0.5 4 4 1 953 33 135 Orono Orchard Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)13 0.5 6 6 53 928 34 365 Old Crystal Bay Road Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.85 0.5 2 2 54 931 35 158.7 70.59 6 64.59Area D Total Area A Area A Total Area B Area B Total Area C Total Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3B-4 (Amendments 1-6) Predicted # of units (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ Zone IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL LAND USE CATEGORIES Name Land Use Category Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 24 A B C D E F G H I 36 Area E Navarre Area 37 3880 Shoreline (Hennepin County) Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)9.37 8 74.96 74.96 1 958 38 3890 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.68 8 5.44 5.44 1 958 39 3860 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.64 8 5.12 5.12 1 958 40 3850 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.78 8 6.24 6.24 1 958 41 3800 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.7 8 5.6 5.6 1 958 42 3596 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.62 8 4.96 4.96 1 958 43 2389 Blaine Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)1.11 8 8.88 8.88 1 958 44 3574 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.47 8 3.76 3.76 1 958 45 3572 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 46 3542 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.46 8 3.68 3.68 1 958 47 3502 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 48 3496 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 49 3480 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 50 3472 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 51 3468 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 52 3465 Lyric Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.62 8 4.96 4.96 1 958 53 3440 Shoreline Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 54 Forfiet Land Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 55 Forfiet Land Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.1 8 0.8 0.8 1 958 56 Parking Lot Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)0.86 8 6.88 6.88 1 958 57 2520 Shadywood Urban Low Density (3-8 u/a)2.02 3 6.06 6.06 1 956 58 3770 Shoreline (Firestation) Urban Medium Density/ Mixed Use (8 -15 u/a)4 8 32 32 1 958 59 24.11 182.78 38.06 144.72 60 Planned Totals 238.1 763 326 437 Area E Total Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3B-4 (Amendments 1-6) (Continued) Predicted # of units (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ Zone IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL LAND USE CATEGORIES Name Land Use Category Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 25 Table 3B-5 Net Density by Land Use (Amendments 1-6) Planned Development Area Net Residential Acres (NRA) # of units (NRA x lowest guided density) Urban Estate Residential (0.5-2 u/a) 158.8 70.5 Urban Low Residential (3-8 u/a) 16.0 47.9 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (8-15 u/a) 50.9 407.0 Urban Medium High (15-20 u/a) 2.5 37.7 Urban High Density Residential (20- 25 u/a) 10.0 200.0 Totals 238.2 763.1 Net Density of Sewered Growth 3.20 This Net Density of Sewered Growth is consistent with the Emerging Suburban Edge designation requiring 3-5 units per acre. 63% of the land (and 6% of the number of households) identified for future sewered growth falls within Orono’s Urban Low Density areas. Development of these areas typically follows a piecemeal pattern as individual properties split into 1-3 units, where lots can accommodate subdivision. 20% of the land (and 40% of the identified for future growth) is in the Navarre area; Due to the costs associated with redevelopment, including acquisition of multiple parcels, and the city’s conservative view of public financial aid to private sector development, it is anticipated that this growth will be slow. The balance of the predicted sewered growth will occur on the remaining larger parcels where municipal services are available currently. Table 3B-6 below illustrates that based on predicted development patterns, the City can meet its projected growth in the sewered areas. Table 3B-6 Planned Development in MUSA areas by Decade (Amendments 1-6) Households Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. 2030 Est. Change from 2016 2040 Est Change from 2030 Households (all city) 2826 3037 3335 3,560 225 3,900 340 Growth predicted (MUSA areas only) 326 437 Surplus (Deficit) 101 97 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts, Table 3B -4 Based on the planned growth identified in Table 3B-4, there are no negative impacts to wastewater or transportation systems. At build out, additional water storage and/or conservation measures may be necessary in the Navarre area, as described in Chapter 4C of this Plan. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 26 EMPLOYMENT Employment levels in the City have grown slowly, and are expected to remain static over the next two decades, as shown in Figure 3B-1 below and Table 3B-1. Figure 3B-1 Employment As illustrated in Figure 3B-2, Education services are highest employer by industry at 32% of all jobs in Orono. Retail trade is the third highest employer at 15% of jobs. The City anticipates employment growth to occur as existing businesses evolve and grow. With the exception of new commercial areas along the west side of Shadywood, the City does not anticipate the expansion of commercial areas in the city. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2030 2040 Employment 1970 -2040 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 27 Figure 3B-2 Employment by Industry HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION PLAN Orono began to develop in the mid 19th Century, and many of the vestiges of early development are still present, in the form of standing buildings and structures, foundations, fence lines, roadway corridors, place names and other more subtle reminders of the past. Additionally, due to Orono’s unique location on the shores of Lake Minnetonka, prehistoric native burial mound sites are known to have existed in various locations throughout the City. Orono has long encouraged the preservation of historic sites and structures, but has never adopted a formal preservation plan. Because no formal plan has been in place, many historic properties have been lost or significantly changed as development and redevelopment progressed. The subdividing of many of the old lakeshore estate properties has typically left a stately mansion surrounded by modern high-end homes rather than formal grounds. The City is fortunate that the West Hennepin Pioneer’s Association Museum is located in neighboring Long Lake, with its members serving as an invaluable resource for helping to preserve the past. Historic Preservation Policies 1. In order to ensure that Orono’s heritage is preserved, the City will consider development of a Historic Preservation Plan. The intent of such a plan would be to establish goals, policies and local regulations resulting in preservation of historic sites, buildings, place names, corridors, etc. 2. Orono will work with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in determining whether properties proposed for development contain historically significant resources which should be preserved. To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP, Community Development Director Date: July 19, 2021 Subject: #LA21-000046, City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan amendment to create and amend new land use categories, primarily impacting 2060 Wayzata Blvd W, 3025 Wayzata Blvd W, and Navarre. Public Hearing Summary of Changes: Existing Land Use Classes Class Density (Low) Density (High) Urban Low Density Residential 0.5 2 Urban Medium Density Residential 3 10 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 10 20 Urban High Density Residential 20 25 Proposed Land Use Classes Class Density (Low) Density (High) Urban Estate Density Residential 0.5 2 Urban Low Density Residential 3 8 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 8 15 Urban Medium High Density 15 20 Urban High Density Residential 20 25 Background The Comprehensive Plan (Plan) establishes Land Use Classes for each area of the city. With each residential land use class, the Plan applies a density range, establishing an appropriate level of density based on a number of factors, including surrounding land use, transportation Application Summary: The City is proposing minor changes to the Comprehensive Plan that include renaming three existing Land Use Classes, introduction of a new Land Use Category (Urban Medium High Density Residential) and modification of two existing Land use categories’ density ranges, summarized on the table below. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the amendment as proposed. Council Exhibit C LA21-46 FILE # LA21-46 July 19, 2021 Page 2 of 3 opportunities/ character, and utility options. Developments outside of this range require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. When a development is proposed with density below a guided class, the next lowest density class is used. For example, when the Orono Crossing townhome project was being reviewed, the developers and City were required to accept 37 units on the property to maintain 10 units per acre. If 36 units were proposed, the density would have fallen below 10 units an acre, and the next lowest class, Urban medium density (density range 3-10 units per acre), would have had to be used. Because the growth and housing goals in the Comprehensive plan are based on the lowest density in the class range, a reduction from Urban Medium High Density (10-20 units per acre) to Urban Medium Density (3-10 units per acre) would have had a negative effect on the Plan, including falling behind on our growth and affordable housing goals. The solution may have included adding higher density to areas not desired. The City Council has directed staff to prepare an amendment that provides interim steps between the classes; 3-10 units, 10-20, and 20-25. This amendment has two primary goals: 1. Establish appropriate levels of density in specific areas, and 2. Prevent situations where a reduction in density does not have a substantial negative impact on the Plan. Plan Analysis: The City is required, by Metropolitan Council mandate, to meet certain goals, including affordable housing, growth opportunity, and density. Affordable Housing. The City must provide for opportunity for 154 new affordable housing units. The Met Council recognizes that densities at 8 units per acre satisfy the affordable housing goal. The city meets this by guiding the appropriate amount of acres at a density greater than 8 units per acre. Reducing the number of acres guided for 8 units per acre or more would impact the number. Sewered Growth. The City must provide opportunity for sewered growth to meet the expected demand in the time periods 2020-2030 and 2031-2040. This is accomplished by identifying parcels with the potential to develop in the given time periods. While the city cannot require development of any parcel, anticipating the growth is important for infrastructure, service and school planning. Density. Finally, the city must develop at a density average of 3.0 units per acre in its sewered area. The city wants to provide sewer to areas adjacent to the lake without increasing the density in those areas, so higher density is identified as appropriate in other areas. Exhibit B is table 3B-4 from the Comprehensive Plan, which identifies parcels eligible for development, their guided land use and density, anticipated growth period, Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), and Traffic Analysis zone (TAZ). How the Plan satisfies these requirements is illustrated in the following table: FILE # LA21-46 July 19, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Note that the density exceeds 3.0 units per acre (3.21), Growth exceeds requirements for both the 2020 and 2030 time periods (101.23 and 96.93, respectively), and affordable housing units exceed requirements (644). This amendment does not introduce higher densities anywhere within the city. Public Comments To date, no written comments from constituents have been received, though staff has fielded a number of calls requesting additional information. Minnetonka Beach has responded to a request for comment, attached as Exhibit C. Issues for Consideration 1.Does the Planning Commission find the land use changes appropriate? 2.Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the changes to the land use tables. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Proposed Land Use Map Exhibit B. Table 3B-4, Impact of Additional Land Use Changes Exhibit C. Minnetonka Beach comment Exhibit D. Mailing information A B C D 1 2021-2030 2031-2040 2021-2030 2031-2040 2 590 272 326 437 3 225 340 225 340 4 365 -68 101.23 96.93 5 6 7 Density (Units/ acres) Total units Required # units Difference Provided Required (Table 3B-6, as amended) Difference Growth Affordable Housing (acres guided for 8 units or more) Current (up to Amend #5)Comp Plan Change Dashboard 154 605 63.39 644.69 154 490.69 3.70 3.21 With adjustments as noted 63.39 759 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 1 5. LA21-000046 CITY OF ORONO, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CREATE NEW AND AMEND LAND USE CATEGORIES, PRIMARILY IMPACTING 2060 WAYZATA BLVD W, 3025 WAYZATA BLVD W, AND SHORELINE DRIVE IN NAVARRE. (STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart noted the City is proposing a Comprehensive Plan amendment that will create a new land-use category and amend three existing land-use categories. They are not proposing to change uses from commercial to residential or from residential to industrial. Rather, it is modifying within the existing framework of their land-use guidance. All cities in the metro area are required to update their Comprehensive Plan every 10 years; Orono last did theirs in 2018. As part of the plan the Met Council requires that the City provide opportunity to meet three key goals within the land-use plan. They must provide an average density of development in the sewered area of the City of 3 units/acre. The City must also provide 154 affordable housing units throughout the community; those areas that are guided for densities at 8 units/acre or more. The third requirement is the City must provide an opportunity to meet the expected growth in the 2020 time period and the 2030 time period. For Orono it was adding 225 units between 2020 and 2030 and another 340 units between 2030 and 2040. This does not mean the City can tap on any property owner’s shoulder and say they must develop today; rather, they must provide the opportunity for that to happen. Barnhart explained within each density, Met Council only cares about the lowest density number. The City has tried to sparingly apply density in land-use planning to the area it is most appropriate, usually adjacent to highways, bus routes, employment areas, water and sewer areas. He explained the residential classes and showed them on screen contrasted with the proposed changes of urban estate, urban low, urban medium, urban medium-high, and urban high density classifications. The City Council directed Staff to look at the land use classes; these changes primarily impact two known properties: the Dumas Orchard and Eagle Ridge. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. Jim Hillier, 1224 Briar Street, has been corresponding with Barnhart to make sure that the zoning density accomplishes the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and those conversations were around how they can make sure they do that. He was very happy to finally see this as he thinks it is long overdue. For years the City Council has been trying to get density and zoning aligned to meet the goals of the plan. He thinks it looks great, however, he thinks the City needs to do a better job of looking at all the opportunities; he brought an opportunity for the Crystal Bay neighborhood to do what they are doing here and expand opportunities for affordable housing. He thinks they must look at all of the opportunities and not just those identified here tonight. He is waiting for a response from Barnhart as to the Crystal Bay neighborhood because there are sewer stubs available, empty lots available, and there are others that need to be looked at. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Kirchner thinks this is a good step in the right direction and can be supportive of it. Ressler moved, McCutcheon seconded, to approve LA21-000046 City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Create New and Amend Land Use Categories. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays 0. Council Exhibit D LA21-46 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake Density Reducedto 8 - 15 units/acre L o n g L a k e C r e e k P a i n t e r C r e e k Minnetonka Blvd Wi l l i s t o n R o a d V i n e H i l l R o a d Lake St Extension Highland Ave T u x e d o B l v d 6thAveN Fe r n d a l e R o a d N Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 N S u n s e t D r Hu n t e r D r W i l s h i r e Blvd Star k e y R o a d Rutledge Road 22ndA v e N Lynw ood Blvd Co m m e r c e B l v d Highw a y 12 E 6 t h A v e N T o n k a w o o d R o a d C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 In t e r s t a t e 4 9 4 H i g h w o o d Dr C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 N A r m D r S h a dywoodRoad Azure Road B r o w n R o a d N S h o r e l i n e D r Highway 7 19 t h A ve N Oaklan d Ro a d F e r n d a l e R o a d S W o o d h i l l R o a d I nte rsta te 394 8th Ave N N S h oreDr C r o s b y R o a d StoneR o a d H a r b o r L n N RiceStE Watertown Road G l e a s o n L a k e D r B a r t l e t t B l v d M ee t i n g S t Hi g h l a n d R o a d P a i n t e r R o a d 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d S Wi l l o w D r N C a n t e r b u ryDr Donald D r Brockton L n N BaysideRoad L i n n e r R o a d Du n k i r k L n N KelleyPkw y Wi l l o w D r S County Road 151 Le a f S t Ra n c h v i e w L n N Lake Ave Da niels St M c C u l l e y R o a d C o u n t y R o a d 1 1 0 N H i g h c r o f t Road Vi c t o r i a S t S p a r r o w R o a d Drake Dr O ro n o O r c h a r d R o a d S 1 2 t h A v e N LakeStE I s l a nd V i e w D r Sunnyfield Road E P k w y 4th Ave N Ni a g a r a L n N To w n L i n e R o a d D e v on Dr P a r k Ave V i c k s b u r g L n NOrchardLn S t e e l e S t Park St E Grand Ave B u s h a w a y R o a d C a r l s o n P k w y No r t h e r n A v e S u s a n L n Do v e L n M a n o r R o a d 20th A v e N Fin c h L n 9 t h A v e N Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d N OldLongLake Ro a d Le r o y S t 23rd Ave N Co u n t y R o a d 8 3 Lyric Ave Sussex D r Spring H i l l R o a d Te m pleDr Crown Dr E astw o o d R o a d 5 t h A v e N Fox St Moline Road Ta m a r a c k D r D e b o r a hDr F arvie w Ln C y g n e t P l W Branch Road Turner Road S hore l i n e Dr Wa yza ta Blvd E W a y z a t a B l vdW 1 8 t h AveN Ma p D o c u m e n t : \ \ A r c s e r v e r 1 \ G I S \ O R N O \ C 1 3 1 1 4 8 1 4 \ E S R I \ M a p s \ L a n d U s e \ O R N O _ 3 B - 3 _ P l a n n e d L a n d u s e _ 1 1 x 1 7 L . m x d | D a t e S a v e d : 7 / 1 3 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 1 1 : 1 0 P M 2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Proposed Future Land UseJuly 2021 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit / 5 acres) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Island Residential Urban Estate Density Residential (0.5 - 2 units / acre) Urban Low Density Residential (3 - 8 units / acre) Urban Medium Density Residential / Mixed Use 8 - 15 units / acre) Urban Medium High Density Residential (15 - 20 units / acre) Urban High Density Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Commercial / Office Industrial Park, Recreational, and Open Space Map 3B-3a DickeysLake GVWX112 W ayzata Blvd W Wi l l o w D r N Kelley PkwyOl d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d N W i llowViewDr B r o w n R o a d N Dickey L a k e D r S ugarwoodDr Density Reduced to 8 - 15 units/acreLakeMinnetonka GVWX19 GVWX15 Bl a i n e A v e N a v a r r e L n S ha dywood R oad Shoreline Dr N o r t h e r n A v e Na v a r r e A v e L i v i ngston Ave Crystal Pl Lyric A v e O liveAve B a yviewPl K e l l y Ave Inset 1 Inset 2 Inset 1 Inset 2 Council Exhibit E LA21-46 ABCDEFGHI J 1 2 Dumas Urban Medium/ Mixed Use (8-15 u/a)25.1 8 200.8 200.8 32 921 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a Eisinger Meadows Urban Low (3-8 u/a)5 3 15 15 Not yet developed, added to earlier table 3 Eisinger Flats Urban High (20-25 u/a)10 20 200 200 50 921 No change to density 4 40.1 415.8 215 200.8 5 6 "St. Thomas Prop"Urban Medium/ Mixed Use (8-15 u/a)3.69 8 29.52 29.52 0 10 922 Amendment #5, approved at 10 u/a 7 2060 Wayzata Urban Medium High (15-20 u/a)2.51 15 37.65 37.65 10 923 density dropped from 20 to 15 8 6.2 67.17 67.17 0 9 Area C, North Fire Station Area 10 Hwy 12 frontage Urban Low (3-8 u/a)1.71 3 5.13 5.13 34 929 No change to lowest density in range 11 Garden Prop.Urban Low (3-8 u/a)3.41 3 10.23 10.23 34 929 No change to lowest density in range 12 Glendale Drive Urban Low (3-8 u/a)3.82 3 11.46 11.46 34 929 No change to lowest density in range 13 8.94 26.82 0 26.82 14 Area D (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) Urban Low Density 15 690 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)18 0.5 9 9 40 927 Class Name Change only; No change to density 16 740 Brown Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 40 927 Class Name Change only; No change to density 17 3400 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.26 0.5 2 2 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 18 3295 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.23 0.5 2 2 31 931 Class Name Change only; No change to density 19 3345 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.69 0.5 2 2 31 931 Class Name Change only; No change to density 20 3350 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.12 0.5 3 3 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 21 3320 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.06 0.5 1 1 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 22 3300 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.55 0.5 2 2 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 23 3280 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.95 0.5 2 2 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 24 3250 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.31 0.5 2 2 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 25 3200 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.12 0.5 2 2 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 26 3175 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.49 0.5 3 3 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 27 3125 Fox Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.44 0.5 3 3 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 28 825 Old Crystal Bay Road Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)17.61 0.5 8 8 31 954 Class Name Change only; No change to density 29 1700 Shoreline Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)20.14 0.5 10 10 37 955 Class Name Change only; No change to density 30 1100 Millston Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)12.7 0.5 6 6 37 955 Class Name Change only; No change to density 31 1003 Wildhurst Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)10 0.5 4 4 1 953 Class Name Change only; No change to density 32 135 Orono Orchard Rd Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)13 0.5 6 6 53 928 No change to density, Amend #3 33 365 Old Crystal Bay Road Urban Estate (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.85 0.5 2 2 54 931 No change to density, Amend #4 34 158.7 70.59 6 64.59 35 Area E Navarre Area 36 3880 Shoreline (Hennepin County) Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)9.37 8 74.96 74.96 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 37 3890 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.68 8 5.44 5.44 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 38 3860 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.64 8 5.12 5.12 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 39 3850 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.78 8 6.24 6.24 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 40 3800 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.7 8 5.6 5.6 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 41 3596 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.62 8 4.96 4.96 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 42 2389 Blaine Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)1.11 8 8.88 8.88 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 43 3574 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.47 8 3.76 3.76 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 44 3572 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 45 3542 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.46 8 3.68 3.68 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 46 3502 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 47 3496 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.31 8 2.48 2.48 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 48 3480 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 49 3472 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 50 3468 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 51 3465 Lyric Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.62 8 4.96 4.96 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 52 3440 Shoreline Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 53 Forfiet Land Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.15 8 1.2 1.2 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 54 Forfiet Land Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.1 8 0.8 0.8 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 55 Parking Lot Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)0.86 8 6.88 6.88 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 56 2520 Shadywood Urban Low Density (3-8 u/a)2.02 3 6.06 6.06 1 956 No change to density 57 3770 Shoreline (Firestation) Urban Medium/ Mixed use (8-15 u/a)4 8 32 32 1 958 Class Name Change; Lowest density dropped to 8 u/a from 10 u/a 58 24.11 182.78 38.06 144.72 59 Planned Totals 238.1 763 326 437 Notes Area D Total Area E Total Area A Area A Total Area B Area B Total Area C Total Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3B-4 Predicted # of units (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ Zone IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL LAND USE CATEGORIES Name Land Use Category Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density Council Exhibit F LA21-46 From:Heidi Honey To:Jeremy Barnhart; "sweske@longlakemn.gov"; "dtolsma@ci.spring-park.mn.us" Cc:Adam Edwards Subject:RE: City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment LA21-000046 Date:Wednesday, July 14, 2021 1:55:41 PM Hi Jeremy, Since the City of Orono is proposing reducing density, we do not have any comments on the proposed changes. Thank you, Heidi Honey City Administrator City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:09 AM To: 'sweske@longlakemn.gov' <sweske@longlakemn.gov>; 'dtolsma@ci.spring-park.mn.us' <dtolsma@ci.spring- park.mn.us>; Heidi Honey <hhoney@ci.minnetonka-beach.mn.us> Cc: Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment LA21-000046 The city of Orono is contemplating Comprehensive Plan Amendments that will: 1.create a new land use category, Urban Medium High Density Residential, (density 15-20 units per acre) which will be applied to the property at 2060 Wayzata Blvd, and 2. adjust the density ranges for the Urban Medium High/ Mixed use from 10-20 units / acre to 8-15 units per acre, which will be applied to the Dumas Orchard property and many of the parcels along the north side of Shoreline in Navarre, and 3. adjust the density ranges for the Urban Medium from 3-10 units/ acre to 3-8 units/ acre These changes are illustrated on attached map. If your community has any comments on the proposed changes, I would appreciate them by August 3rd for inclusion in the City Council packet. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at the number below. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director City of Orono 952-249-4626 Council Exhibit G LA21-46 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. To consider a resolution approving vacation of approximately 140 feet of Westlake Street. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on April 21, 2021 and considered to be complete on April 21st. After a 60 day extension, the 60-day review expires August 18th. Due to the 60 day review statute, two resolutions are provided, one for approval and another for denial. The Council must make a decision before August 18th. 3. Background. The applicant is anticipating a platting project that combines several parcels that he owns on the south terminus of Westlake Street. The vacation request is the initial step. He requests to vacate the southern 140 feet (approximate) of Westlake. In exchange, he proposes to provide the remaining 1/3 of the cul de sac as part of the plat, a drainage and utility easement for existing sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements, and $100,000 as a cash donation. Staff has recommended a pedestrian access easement to the lake. The Comprehensive Plan takes an open approach to considering vacation requests. In Chapter 4E Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Policies: 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City’s intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end, the City will follow these policies: Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public’s right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. These policies are echoed in the General Transportation Policies, Part 4A: 5. It is the city’s intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography, water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions, the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. The Lake Access map is attached as Exhibit G. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 19th. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 3 to 2 on a motion to deny the requested variance. Erickson abstained, Ressler and McCuthcheon voted no. 5. Public Comment. Comments from the neighbors were received and are attached as Exhibit E. Several residents spoke at the public hearing, most in support of the vacation, but not in support of the pedestrian access easement. One resident spoke against the vacation. Planning Commission minutes are provided as Exhibit C. Item No.: 14 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000029 – Robert D. Erickson, 365 Westlake Road, Street Vacation – Resolution No. 7211 Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Community Development Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 6. Staff Recommendation. The provision of easements (pedestrian and drainage/ utility), the completion of the cul de sac, and donation of $100,000 are benefits to the city, minimizing the undesirable impacts of the vacation. Staff recommends approval of the vacation subject to those provisions. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution a. Resolution of approval b. Resolution of denial B. PC Staff report C. PC Minutes –Draft D. Vacation graphic E. Public Comments F. DNR Comment letter G. Lake Access points H. Area utilities I. Site photos J. Applicant photos References PC Staff Report & Exhibits 7-19-21 2040 Comprehensive Plan CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 1 of 2 A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF WESTLAKE STREET WITHIN THE PLAT OF HILLSIDE PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. LA21-000029 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2021, Robert Erickson, (hereinafter the “Applicant”), made a complete application to vacate the southern 140 feet of platted right-of-way abutting lots and legally described as follows. That part of Westlake Street (dedicated as Lake Street in the plat of “Hillside Park”) which lies southerly of a curve concave to the north having a radius of 50 feet. Said curve passes through the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1, “Hillside Park” and passes through a point on the westerly line of Lot 10, said Block 1 distant 74.16 feet south from said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of said curve is on the center line of Westlake Street, subject to a drainage and utility easement to the City of Orono over all of the above described property. WHEREAS, on April 23, 2021, information on the vacation request was sent to the DNR, as the right of way provides access to Lake Minnetonka, and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 3 in favor of and 2 against a motion to recommend denial of the requested vacation; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Orono Council finds the vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The applicant agrees to grant the public a drainage and utility easement to protect existing drainage and utility infrastructure. 2. The applicant agrees to provide right of way for the completion of the cul de sac at the proposed southern terminus of Westlake Street. 3. The applicant agrees to his unsolicited a donation of $100,000 to facilitate public improvements and services in the area. 4. The applicant agrees to provide a 20 foot wide public access easement to the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka to provide for future access. 5. The City Council finds that, with these easements and other considerations: a. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. b. The City does not intend to develop, improve, or use the existing right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that upon provision of items 1-4 listed above, the vacation of the right of way area as described above is hereby granted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 9nd day of August, 2021. ATTEST: ________________________ __________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 1 of 2 A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF WESTLAKE STREET WITHIN THE PLAT OF HILLSIDE PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. LA21-000029 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2021, Robert Erickson, (hereinafter the “Applicant”), made a complete application to vacate the southern 140 feet of platted right-of-way abutting lots and legally described as follows. That part of Westlake Street (dedicated as Lake Street in the plat of “Hillside Park”) which lies southerly of a curve concave to the north having a radius of 50 feet. Said curve passes through the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1, “Hillside Park” and passes through a point on the westerly line of Lot 10, said Block 1 distant 74.16 feet south from said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of said curve is on the center line of Westlake Street, subject to a drainage and utility easement to the City of Orono over all of the above described property. WHEREAS, on April 23, 2021, information on the vacation request was sent to the DNR, as the right of way provides access to Lake Minnetonka, and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 3 in favor of and 2 against a motion to recommend denial of the requested vacation; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Orono Council finds, relative to the vacation as proposed: 1. The right of way in question is currently being used for sewer, drainage, and other utility purposes. 2. The right of way in question includes one of 5 lake accesses on the north side of Stubbs Bay. The City Council finds that, with these easements and other considerations: a. The vacation may affect access to or use of any adjoining property in the future. b. The vacation limits options for the city in terms of future development, improvements, or use the existing right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the vacation of the right of way area as described above is hereby denied by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 9nd day of August, 2021. ATTEST: ________________________ __________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Date Application Received: April 20, 2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: April 21, 2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: August 18, 2021 (after extension) To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP, Community Development Director Date: July 19, 2021 Subject: #LA21-000029, Robert D. Erickson , 365 Westlake Rd, Street and Alley Vacation Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing a platting project that combines several parcels, vacated right of way, and a new cul de sac in the area of 365 and 372 Westlake. This initial action is to vacate the portion of Westlake that extends to Lake Minnetonka and a portion of existing alley on the west side of 365 Westlake. Applicable Regulations: MN State Statute 412.851 VACATION OF STREETS The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four-fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice. The council shall cause written notice of the hearing to be mailed to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation at least ten days before the hearing. The notice must contain, at minimum, a copy of the petition or proposed resolution as well as the time, place, and date of the hearing. In addition, if the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent to any public water, written notice of the petition or proposed resolution must be served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources at least 60 days before the hearing on the matter. The notice to the commissioner of natural resources does not create a right of intervention by the commissioner. At least 15 days prior to convening the hearing required under this section, the council or its designee must consult with the commissioner of natural resources to review the proposed vacation. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval to vacate approximately 66 lineal feet of platted alley and 140 lineal feet of Westlake street, south of a proposed cul de sac. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval, subject to the provision of Drainage/ Utility easements, on the plat, and a pedestrian easement, and additional right of way to complete the cul de sac. Council Exhibit B LA21-29 FILE # LA21-000029 June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 4 The commissioner must evaluate: 1. the proposed vacation and the public benefits to do so; 2. the present and potential use of the land for access to public waters; and 3. how the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. The commissioner must advise the city council or its designee accordingly upon the evaluation. After a resolution of vacation is adopted, the clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings which shall contain the name of the city, an identification of the vacation, a statement of the time of completion thereof, and a description of the real estate and lands affected thereby. The notice shall be presented to the county auditor who shall enter the same in the transfer records and note upon the instrument, over official signature, the words "entered in the transfer record." The notice shall then be recorded with the county recorder. Any failure to file the notice shall not invalidate any vacation proceedings. MN State Statue 462.358 Subd. 7. Vacation The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways under a home rule charter or other provisions of law. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve". Orono City Code. Sec. 78-9. - Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this chapter; except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice, all as required by Minn. Stat. § 412.851. The council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, and telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as v acation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as boulevard reserve. Orono’s 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan: Transportation Chapter 4A - Lake access, preservation and management Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. This value was long ago realized by City leaders. In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to 66' in width. FILE # LA21-000029 June 21, 2021 Page 3 of 4 These right-of-ways (often referred to as “fire lanes” or “lake access roads”) vary considerably in their proximity to traffic, parking availability, proximity to housing, lakeshore conditions, and other factors that affect their recreational value. Some of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice-fishing accesses. Certain accesses have docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography, shallow water depths, undesirable lake bottom conditions, and/or dense vegetation and experience little or no usage. Orono’s 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 4E Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces 1. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City’s intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end, the City will follow these policies: Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public’s right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. Analysis: The Council must find that there is no public benefit to the land in question. If none, the county will distribute it back to the original owner, usually half to each abutting owner. There are public improvements within the right of way in question, though these benefits can be preserved in other ways. Staff is recommending placing a 20 foot wide easement over the storm sewer and providing an easement for pedestrian access to the lake. The Comprehensive plan identifies extension of Westlake as a lake access, noting it is for walking access only. Due to the heavy vegetation at the waters edge, access is likely limited to the winter time. There are 4 other lake access on the north side of Stubbs Bay. The portion of right of way to be vacated lies south of a platted partial cul de sac. The rest of the cul de sac will be platted as part of the process. The right of way includes sanitary sewer along the middle of the right of way. Stormwater surface flows through ditches to the lake. Given the additional right of way for the cul de sac, and the recommended easements maintain access to the lake and for storm water, staff finds that there is public benefit to the vacation request. DNR Comments The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has received the vacation request. Their FILE # LA21-000029 June 21, 2021 Page 4 of 4 comments are provided as attached Exhibit D. They do not support the vacation because, in part, future needs are not known. Engineer Comments A portion of the sanitary sewer system is located within the Westlake right of way to be vacated. This infrastructure, and the overland stormwater flow, can be preserved with a drainage and utility easement to be shown on the plat. Public Comments To date, two letters in support of the request have been received, and are attached as Exhibit E. Issues for Consideration 1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff supports the proposed vacation, subject to additional right of way for the cul de sac, and the provision of drainage/ utility and pedestrian easements. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Vacation Graphics Exhibit C. Lake access Map with Table Exhibit D. DNR Comments Exhibit E. Public Comments Exhibit F. Area Map Exhibit G. Area Utilities Exhibit H. Sketch Plan and aerial photos Exhibit I. Site Photos Exhibit J. Mailing Information MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 8 1. LA21-000029 BOB ERICKSON, 365 WESTLAKE STREET, VACATION OF PLATTED RIGHTS-OF-WAY – WESTLAKE AND ADJACENT ALLEY. (STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Bob Erickson, Applicant, was present. Commissioner Erickson stepped down and excused himself for the item. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart stated Mr. Erickson is requesting a vacation to vacate a portion of Westlake Street adjacent to his property. Originally the request included vacation of an adjacent alley but he has removed that from the request. This is part of a multi-step process and ultimately the Applicant is proposing to plat this property and provide right-of-way to complete the portion of a cul- de-sac that is already platted. The Applicant is also proposing to provide an easement for an existing sanitary sewer facility in that area. Staff is recommending - in addition to the easement for drainage and utility purposes - a pedestrian access to maintain access to the lake. Staff has received a number of comments from neighboring property owners who object to that pedestrian access easement. Staff supports the vacation request subject to the easement for drainage and utility purposes, and subject to a pedestrian access easement to maintain or provide access to Lake Minnetonka in this area. Staff notes that there are four other accesses on Stubbs Bay; one is for winter only, one is for fishing only, and two are noted as no public access in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has received a number of comments in support of the vacation, and some comments that object to the easement for pedestrian access. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions. Chair Kirchner asked if the easement and right-of-way for pedestrian access would be improved at this time. Barnhart replied the easement for drainage and utility is already improved, the pedestrian access improvements are not proposed at this time. There would be no change right now, it would be for potential future access to the lake. Bollis asked if there are any current conditions on access number 14, the one they are looking at vacating, such as winter access, no motorized vehicles, etcetera. Barnhart stated that access is noted as pedestrian access in the current Comprehensive Plan. Ressler asked if that portion of the property is currently being used as pedestrian access. Barnhart said used is a strong term, it is pretty overgrown and he showed some pictures of the access point with large cattails growing. He noted it is not likely that it would be a summer access without significant improvements; he imagines it may be a winter access in the future or perhaps even now. It is not restricted based on the Comprehensive Plan. Gettman asked if a pedestrian access would potentially change the DNR’s position. Barnhart replied the DNR provides comment and recommendation but not a lot of weight. The access for pedestrians would support their goals for lake access for the State. Bollis asked what width they are suggesting for this easement. Council Exhibit C LA21-29 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 8 Barnhart said probably similar to the easement necessary for the sanitary sewer; the goal is not to restrict development for the property owners on either side but to maintain access so 20 feet is likely. Bob Erickson, 365 Westlake Street, read a letter he sent out to his neighbors: To our neighbors: Thank you for this opportunity to share with you our vision for Westlake Street improvement that we believe will improve vehicle function and home values in our neighborhood. Our long-term plan began to take shape in 1999 when we applied for a rearrangement of the two parcels we had purchased at 365 and 372 Westlake so that the unequally-sized lots could be made more equal in area in lakeshore measurements. As part of that process, we donated a half-circle of land on the east side of Westlake Street for a future cul-de-sac. At the same time, the City Council voted to close the part of the street south of the cul-de-sac to all motorized vehicles. Later, we acquired the house at 365 Westlake Street and two smaller houses which were demolished about a year-and-a-half ago. Now the time has come for us to plan for the cul-de-sac completion by applying for vacation of the south 140 feet of Westlake Street and combining that area with the 365 Westlake property for which we will pay $100,000. In addition, we will donate a new half-circle of land on the west side of the street to complete the area needed for the cul-de-sac. We will also donate easements over the vacated land to the City for drainage and sanitary sewer maintenance. In view of the recently announced addition of Westlake Street to the list of streets to be improved during 2022, we are also willing to add a 10x150 foot donation of land at 341 Westlake Street as a boulevard reserve. The original plat for Westlake Street was approved over 100 years ago when most of its traffic was made up of small horse-drawn carriages, the 30 foot right-of-way width was adequate at the time, and firefighters would put hoses into the lake to put out fires. For many years now the Fire Departments have used tank trucks when needed and all types of vehicles have grown in size. That is why a new neighborhood subdivision requires 50 feet of street right-of-way and a 50 foot radius for a cul-de-sac. When complete, the new cul-de-sac will make Westlake Street look and function much like a newer neighborhood. Take a quick spin around the Landmark Drive and Eileen Circle cul- de-sacs to compare how modern vehicles can be accommodated. Delivery trucks, garbage trucks, lawn services, and utility workers all have a much easier time getting in and out of those neighborhoods. If you have questions, we are here to answer them in person or by phone. Signed, Bob and Lisa Erickson. Since sending out this letter, Mr. Erickson has received five endorsements of the street vacation and cul- de-sac. Mr. Erickson’s general comment regarding the DNR is that he cannot work with this as the DNR is describing it, as it would negatively impact the value of the real estate and the value of their neighbor’s real estate. Finally, what the DNR described as having no public value actually has no value to the DNR for access to a lake which is overgrown and has little or no water in it at this point. He stated he has been there for 18 years and the access does not get used for obvious reasons in looking at photographs. He noted the DNR’s comment has no basis in fact; to be more specific, the letter talks about present and potential use. Mr. Erickson noted there is no present use. The letter says regarding potential uses: “as land-use patterns change…” As a Planning Commissioner and someone who participated before that in the Guide Plan Advisory Committee, they all get involved in land-use, making those decisions or giving advice. Land-use patterns do not just change by themselves and the Guide Plan is supposed to be good for 20-30 years although it gets reviewed every 10 years. The DNR’s letter also stated fluctuation in lake levels, either seasonal or long-term, can be unpredictable. Mr. Erickson has also served on the Board of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and they work very hard at maintaining lake levels where they would like them to be. He copied a graphic from the MCWD where it shows how the control mechanism works at the Gray’s Bay Dam; he noted the lowest the lake ever was, was in the 1930’s during the drought and depression where it reached 922 feet above sea level. He noted on the graphic it shows the record high level is 931.1 feet above sea level which has been approached several times over the last 115 years but has never gone over that. He stated for planning purposes a projected regional flood of four- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 8 tenths of a foot higher than that; this would be virtually impossible to exceed because before getting to that point there is unrestricted flow into Minnehaha Creek, which leads over the falls and into the Mississippi River. The only way this could happen is if the Mississippi River raises itself 230 feet and it would then be at the 931 that Lake Minnetonka is at. He clarified at the 931 the MSP Airport would be 120 feet underwater. The DNR stated the access may be needed for emergency vehicles, to which Mr. Erickson responded if the airport is 100 feet underwater he thinks the emergency vehicles will be concentrating their efforts in South Minneapolis rather than Lake Minnetonka. He finds it hard to be convinced by a figment of someone’s imagination. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Wade Kram, 340 Westlake Street, noted Westlake Street is a tiny little street. If they had the public access after the cul-de-sac were to come in and have people come for this supposed snowshoeing or snowmobile access and trample over everything that is already there, when right around the corner they have the Stubbs Bay Road with the beautiful park that has been renovated and all of the parking, it does not make any sense. Why would someone venture off into a neighborhood, park their vehicle on an already tiny street and impede things for service trucks. He said to put that potential traffic far outweighs, in the negative, the positive of some potential access someone may need 50-100 years down the road. He does not understand and from a safety standpoint, he has three little children, and with increased traffic, potential littering, and parking it does not make sense to him. Linda Thrasher, 356 Westlake Street stated Mr. Erickson has presented an unusual partnership as one does not see many private landowners offering to pay $100,000 for beautification of a cul-de-sac. She understands that he, too, will benefit but her advice would be to take advantage of a unique opportunity of which adding public access destroys the integrity of what Mr. Erickson is trying to do. The Erickson’s have done a fabulous job with their current property and if their vision for that property is the same for the cul-de-sac, it is going to be gorgeous and will be natural – that is what Ms. Thrasher would like the DNR to see. Having a public access just does not make sense as they have been landowners in the area for 9 years and she has never seen anyone enter the lake for snowshoeing, snowmobiling, or walking. She walks her dog down there and it is impossible to actually access the lake. Driving by the other access points that were pointed out, they are widely used, and she is asking for a rational decision. She said let’s make this rather unattractive, narrow street attractive, and make it easy for vehicles to come turn around and do the right thing. Sherry White, 3516 Ivy Place, is here to ask the Commission to recommend to the City Council that they deny the vacation request for this property. The vacation of the lake access will provide no public benefit and that is the standard the City must adhere to, not whether it is a good idea to have this or not, but rather is there a public benefit in vacating the property. She noted there is a significant financial benefit to the Applicant as he assembles property for development, and she finds that disparity very troubling. The lack of public benefit was stated by the DNR and the Staff recommendation says there is a benefit to having a cul-de-sac and it would be a great thing to have utility, stormwater, and pedestrian easement – but of course the City already has those things. That would not be a gain but a clawing back of a loss. There is public benefit in retaining this property, it is obviously access and they do not know what the future holds. There is a natural resource value in all undeveloped land. There are letters of support giving reasons why the cul-de-sac would be a good thing, she buys that, but the blanket statements of support in those letters with no rationale given is not persuasive. A quick note about pedestrian access, she quoted from the DNR letter that they would recommend that if the City did vacate, they would retain the right of the public to travel across the property. That does not say foot traffic. She hopes this will not be vacated MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 8 but if it is the City should be very thoughtful in crafting conditions for that, which may include stormwater and utility easements, access for pedestrians and recreational vehicles, and City or other government vehicles that may need to access it in the future. She said to require the developer to plant native vegetation, enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to keep that vegetation going, and require signage indicating that there is a public access there. These conditions might somewhat ameliorate the loss of a public property. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. Chair Kirchner said currently in the photographs he saw there is no parking on that street. Is there any intention to widen the street to allow for parking or would it likely remain signed as “no parki ng.” Barnhart does not believe there is any intention to widen the road for parking. Bollis’ understanding is that the developer is not proposing to pay for and build the cul-de-sac. Barnhart’s understanding is they are providing the right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and next year when Westlake is part of the street project the Applicant intends that the City would pave the cul-de-sac at that time. Bollis asked if there is an estimate on the cost to build this cul-de-sac. Barnhart believes that is in engineering at this stage. The pavement will be a decision of the City Council. Kirchner asked if the application they are voting to approve or deny includes pedestrian access or not? Barnhart replied the request is to vacate the road. Staff is supporting the vacation based on several conditions, including the pedestrian access. The Commission can pull conditions out if they so desire. Kirchner thinks they can all agree that the vacation of the roadway to allow for a cul-de-sac development is a sound judgment and the point of contention here is going to be the pedestrian right-of-way access point. Regarding the pedestrian easement, personally, he struggles to vacate that portion of it as they have heard numerous comments of limited use in the last 9-18 years and he does not see how a cul-de-sac at the end of the street is suddenly going to increase pedestrian traffic to that area. If the area remains signed as no parking, there may be someone who snowshoes or cross-country skis there to access it but if the roadway is entirely signed as no parking that would prevent the increased parking on the roadway. He does not see a problem with it and he would like to see the pedestrian right-of-way remain. Ressler is a little conflicted on maintaining the pedestrian access simply because he feels there are five total accesses on Stubbs Bay, some appear to be seasonal. He knows that the one that is guided for fishing access has been used for other uses besides fishing, as he personally has gone through the landing to snowmobile. If Ressler was an emergency vehicle looking for access to the lake he thinks that would be his first choice because of its convenience, efficiency, and direct access without any encumbrances. This particular property with the wetlands is telling as to why it has not been used. He is conflicted as he thinks they may want to reserve the right to future access and he is okay with the vacation not granting the access based upon the other accesses near this location. He is supportive of the vacation as applied. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 8 Gettman said in looking at the density of the different access points, he looks around at West Arm, North Arm, and they have similar density to the access points. More importantly, he learned that one does not give something up unless it is of equal value or more beneficial and that is the whole purpose of doing the vacation, it has to have a public benefit and Gettman is not hearing that. He would latch on to the suggestion that there be signage for public access, keep the cul-de-sac concept as that is good, but also keep the public right-of-way and there would not be the parking issue. He said if they were going to go really far, why not vacate the entire road and let them do the improvement next year and they cannot have their $100,000 invested in whatever but take care of the road. Gettman is not sure he is hearing anything that tips the scale to vacate that public access, it just does not make any sense to him. Bollis thinks they have to keep in mind that there might be five access points on Stubbs Bay but two of those they learned are not actual public access points but for the City’s own purposes. Therefore, they are really only looking at three access points, and one has a winter restriction, so there is this access point and the one on Stubbs Bay Road are the only summer access points. He is not in favor of not having some sort of easement if they go the vacation route. He likes the idea of vacating and trading that for a cul-de-sac but would rather see that the developer builds and pays for the cul-de-sac versus the City. It might cost more than the $100,000 to actually build the cul-de-sac. Therefore, the City may be at a net loss. He is not in favor of it as it is applied for and would be a no vote tonight. McCutcheon was surprised there was not access today, and even if they put a cul-de-sac or any improvement in there, no one is going to use it. In the winter there may be someone walking a dog or an ice fisherman but going down there as it is public use to be walked on, and he does not want to see snowmobiles down there. He struggles because logically he says no, they do not need it because no one uses it, but they cannot predict the future and if it is already there, why take it away. He can understand the neighborhood concern on drawing people in and more activity with a cul-de-sac but he still does not see that. He understands right now the way it is, no one bothers the residents in the neighborhood and in putting any kind of improvement people are going to start using this place more so he understands the contention. He is torn but does not think there would be a lot of activity using it so he would be in favor with the Staff’s recommendation in leaving the ingress and egress access. Ressler may have misunderstood the application and asked if part of the proposal as applied is a cul-de- sac or is that something they are just discussing that would happen later. Barnhart said the cul-de-sac, sanitary sewer easement, and the storm sewer easement are a part of the application or proposal that would manifest itself as part of a final plat. The pedestrian access easement is a Staff recommendation in addition to those others. Ressler agrees with Bollis that the developer pay for the cul-de-sac would be something he would support as a condition. He has no problem with the proposed amount being paid above and beyond that for the property, he does see adequate benefit for the storm water and utility for drainage as a public benefit as well as the ability for emergency vehicles to turn around in said cul-de-sac. Bollis is confused, and asked if tonight they are just voting on vacation and the potential of a cul-de-sac in the future if that property gets platted, but there is nothing to connect that to the vacation. Barnhart replied yes, that is why there are the recommended conditions in terms of the cul-de-sac provision and the easement for the utilities. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 8 Bollis clarified they can vote to approve it tonight based on those conditions later. Barnhart said what the Commission and later City Council would be saying is there is no public benefit or public purpose for this property. Then the County disburses it, typically equally to each property owner on either side. Mr. Erickson owns both properties and he has indicated a desire to re-plat the area, including this to-be-vacated portion. That is when they would see those changes occur and is why they want to see it as a condition. Gettman moved to approve LA21-000029 Bob Erickson, 365 Westlake Street, Vacation of Platted Rights-of-Way – Westlake And Adjacent Alley with Staff recommendations that the vacation provide for the drainage and utility easements, pedestrian easement, and additional right-of-way to complete the cul-de-sac. Ressler asked as applied, is Gettman suggesting that the City would pay for the cul-de-sac? Gettman did not say that, he did not mention the $100,000 offered, so it is just as the Staff had recommended. Kirchner asked Mr. Erickson to provide some clarity as to what the $100,000 would go towards. Mr. Erickson has not specified that so far and the reason is that he feels it is really the City Council’s call. They approve the budget for everything else that goes on, and have asked for amounts from other access vacations in the past. This one is three times the amount of the former high for a wider right-of-way than this one, and also for another lake access that had usable water at it with docks on both sides. He felt that the number itself is the most generous that has been offered for a number of lake accesses that have been closed in recent history. If he had overreached his position as an Applicant, he could have said he wants all or part of it to improve the existing access at Stubbs Bay Road, for example. Barnhart had asked Mr. Erickson to confirm the offer of $100,000 – which he did - and the City Council will determine what an appropriate use is for that money. He would suggest Gettman add that as part of the recommendation. Mr. Erickson clarified if he had specified that the $100,000 be used for improvement of a public access such as Stubbs Bay Road, then the DNR objection would have been nullified. Amended Motion by Gettman to include the $100,000 contribution to the General Fund with his original motion. Motion seconded by Kirchner. Ressler clarified the only reason he would be opposed in this vote is because he is concerned over the cost of what the cul-de-sac is going to be as that would be on the burden of the City. He also feels the adequate benefit to the City and would be okay with vacating the public access. McCutcheon said they never want to take away value. He sees this neighborhood and it is a really quiet street. Yes, there was access to Lake Minnetonka but no one used it because it was not really feasible. Putting a cul-de-sac there may make it feasible and may impact their value. He sees the point they make about creating a cul-de-sac and making something more accessible that was not there before. In thinking about that he feels for the neighborhood and from a citizen point-of-view it is not a great access as the MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 8 cattails are 8 feet tall for 50 feet of lake. He may change a bit and is not in support of the public easement, but he is supportive of the vacation and taking away the pedestrian traffic. Bollis said speaking as the only non-lake resident right now, he does not see a problem with keeping access to the lake for those that do not live on the lake. It will be a no for him because even if they include the easement for people to walk on it, he still feels like the cul-de-sac is going to cost more than the $100,000 being donated. Kirchner hears that concern and noted earlier there was discussion about requiring the developer to pay for the cul-de-sac. This vacation would need to happen before a cul-de-sac would be approved and the Planning Commission approving a vacation does not necessarily mean that a cul-de-sac is going in next year, five years, ten years…it just means that the right-of-way exists in order to do so. Barnhart believes the intention is that the vacation would occur, and the platting would be completed before the street project next year. The intention of the engineering department is that the cul-de-sac and street pavement would occur at the same time. Gettman commented that the cul-de-sac seems to be an advantage for the public so he does not necessarily suggest that the developer be the one responsible for all of it. They are vacating part of the land and for utilities, for emergency vehicles, for deliveries, and everything else. Cul-de-sacs are things they are always asking for and in this case the road will get done anyway. The benefit for the public is to have a turnaround access as it is safer. He does not see the advantage of giving up the public access because it is one of two public access points to that part of the lake. That is his struggle with trying to combine them. Mayor Dennis Walsh, 1354 Rest Point Circle, wants to clarify the road. He asked the Commissioners not to forget that the City already owns the road that is all the way through the middle, they already have the easement to the right; they are only talking about approximately 25% of the cul-de-sac that Mr. Erickson will give the City the land for. If the City is responsible for all of the rest of the cul-de-sac, he clarified they are only talking about a small piece of the cul-de-sac. He noted it is not an entire cul-de-sac as the City already owns about two-thirds of it, Mr. Erickson will just be giving the City the other one-third. VOTE: Ayes: 2 (Gettman, Kirchner), Nays 3 (Bollis, Ressler, McCutcheon). Barnhart feels that Council should receive a recommendation either to deny the vacation outright or amend the motion such that there is a recommendation of approval of a motion. Gettman would be glad to amend the motion. He asked Staff what kind of wording would be appropriate. Barnhart replied “recommendation to approve the vacation subject to provision of a drainage and utility easement, a pedestrian easement, cul-de-sac right-of-way, and $100,000 or the cost to improve 1/3 of the cul-de-sac, whichever is greater.” Gettman moved to add the additional language by Staff that the caveat of $100,000 or greater if it is determined that the cul-de-sac is more than $100,000. Bollis understands the motion as $100,000 minimum; if the cul-de-sac costs more, it would be in addition to the $100,000. However if it is less, it is still the $100,000. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 8 Kirchner clarified if the cost of the cul-de-sac was $120,000 the cost to the developer would be $120,000 and the City would net zero for vacating this roadway. He summarized that generally the Commission is supportive of the vacation, supportive of the right-of-way of the cul-de-sac, supportive of the drainage and utility easement. Regarding the pedestrian access, there are some dissenting but the majority of the Commission is in favor of that. The biggest sticking point is the monetary value and that could be something that the City Council is made aware of and can be a discussion for them. Gettman suggested denying the application as submitted. Bollis suggested tabling to allow the Applicant time to go back and present them with a plan they could approve. Barnhart noted the Commission reacts to the request in front of them, there is no negotiation. In tabling something, they would generally give the Applicant direction of what they want to see different. If the concern is the cost for the cul-de-sac, the City will not know until February or March of the next year and it is improper to wait for that. Staff’s recommendation was supporting of the vacation independent of the $100,000, because the additional cul-de-sac width offsets any “loss” to the taxpayer. A cul-de-sac that provides easy access and turnaround for emergency vehicles, deliveries, etc…offsets what they “lose” for the vacation. He is hearing from the Commission that they are hung up on the cost for the incremental improvement; if that is the issue, Barnhart recommends approval independent of that and to provide a secondary motion for the Council to better understand the impact of the cul-de-sac expense. By that time perhaps they will have a preliminary estimate or expectation from the City Engineer that Staff can share with the Council. Gettman goes back to the motion to deny as it puts it back on the City Council that if and when they get that additional information, they are the decision-makers and the Planning Commission are making the recommendation; they have heard everything that they have said and there is nothing additional that the Commission would add if they even get that information the following month. He wonders if the City Council wouldn’t be better off themselves getting that information and making an educated decision. Gettman moved, Bollis seconded, to deny LA21-000029 Bob Erickson, 365 Westlake Street, Vacation of Platted Rights-of-Way – Westlake and Adjacent Alley as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 3 (Bollis, Gettman, Kirchner); Nays 2 (McCutcheon, Ressler) This item will be reviewed by the City Council on August 9, 2021. Commissioner Erickson returned to his seat at the Planning Commission bench. Council Exhibit C LA21-29 Council Exhibit E LA21-29 Email comment: Linda Thrasher <lthrasher01@gmail.com> Expressing Support for Application LA21-000029 -- Bob Erickson, 365 Westlake Street, Vacation of platted right-of-way By way of introduction, we reside at 356 Westlake Street in Orono and are writing to express our support for Bob Erickson's proposed right-of-way. We have met with Bob and Lisa Erickson and reviewed the details of completing the proposed cul de sac and support Mr. Erickson's proposal to apply for a vacation of the south 127 feet of Westlake Street and combining the parcel with 365 Westlake Street. While Westlake Street does not have a high volume of traffic, various delivery trucks and other large vehicles have increased in recent years. One of the reasons for our support is that many of these vehicles turn around at the end of our driveway and frequently cause damage to our sprinkler system, landscaping and outdoor lighting. Having a cul de sac at the end of the street would mitigate this issue and also increase the aesthetic appearance of the street. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Linda & Rick Thrasher 356 Westlake Street Orono, MN 55356 From:Mike Shields To:Jeremy Barnhart; Scott Kirchner Cc:Bob Erickson (ericksonrobert@comcast.net); Mike Shields; lthrasher01@gmail.com Subject:Support for passing Application LA21-000029 -- Bob Erickson, 365 Westlake Street, Vacation of platted right-of- way Date:Thursday, July 15, 2021 12:34:12 PM Gentlemen - We reside at 364 West Lake Street in Orono and are writing to express our support for Bob Erickson's proposed right-of-way. We have met with Bob Erickson and reviewed the details of completing the proposed cul de sac and we support Mr. Erickson's proposal to apply for a vacation of the south 127 feet of West Lake Street and combining the parcel with 365 West Lake Street. While West Lake Street has a low volume of traffic, various delivery trucks and other large vehicles have increased in recent years. Our reasons for our support is that many of these vehicles turn around at the end of our driveway and many times cause damage to our sprinkler system and landscaping. Having a cul de sac at the end of the street would mitigate this issue and also increase the aesthetic appearance of the street. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Mike & Janelle Shields 364 West Lake Street Orono, MN 55356 Direct – 612-850-8442 Fax – 952-697-6262 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Central Region 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 Office of the Regional Director DNR Central Region Headquarters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 July 7, 2021 City of Orono Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: Proposed Vacation right away adjacent to 372 Westlake and 365 Westlake, terminating at Stubbs Bay, a bay of Lake Minnetonka, Orono, Minnesota. Dear Mr. Barnhart, Thank you for seeking input from the Department of Natural Resources regarding the above referenced proposed vacation. Your letter was forwarded to me to review and provide comments as required by M.S. 412.851. M.S. 412.851 indicates that “No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so.” In response, “The commissioner must evaluate: (1) the proposed vacation and the public benefits to do so; (2) the present and potential use of the land for access to public waters; and (3) how the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources.” The DNR has reviewed the proposed vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to 372 Westlake and 365 Westlake, terminating at Stubbs Bay, a bay of Lake Minnetonka in the city of Orono, and we offer the following comments: The proposed vacation public benefit: There is nothing in the application/letter or survey that indicates a benefit to the public. Present and potential use of the land for access to public waters: As land use patterns change this right of way has potential for access to land and water that may be of vital importance in 50 to 100 years. Fluctuation in lake levels either seasonal or long term can be unpredictable and the city may find the right of way of the road invaluable for emergency access and property owner access during these events. We ask the city to consider this. Council Exhibit F LA21-29 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Central Region 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 If the city chooses to vacate the right of way, we strongly recommend that, in addition to retaining an easement for drainage and utility, the city explicitly retain the right of the public to travel across the property as well. In summary, the Department of Natural Resources concludes that the proposed vacation does not provide public benefits or protect present and potential public use of the land to access to the public water and is opposed to the vacation. If you have any questions or concerns about this letter, please contact Nancy Spooner-Mueller, with DNR Parks and Trails Division, at Nancy.spooner-mueller@state.mn.us. You may contact her by phone at 651-269-1370. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed vacation. Sincerely, Grant L. Wilson Central Region Director Minnesota Department of Natural Resources cc: Nancy Spooner-Mueller, Division of Parks and Trails Rachel Henzen, Division of Parks and trails. #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o n g L a k e C r e e k M i n n e h ahaCreek Pai n t e r C r e e k M i n n e h a h a C r eek Paint er C r e e k GVWX15 GVWX16 GVWX15 GVWX112 GVWX84 GVWX135 GVWX101 GVWX110 GVWX146 GVWX125 GVWX5 GVWX151GVWX19 GVWX6 GVWX19 GVWX101 GVWX6 GVWX51 %&'(394 %&'(494 )*12 )*12 ?@A@7 ST26 ST201 M i n n e t o n k a D r Minnetonka Blvd W o o d h i l l R o a d T hreePointsB l v d Lake St Extension Orcha rd Roa d Highland Ave LynwoodBl vd P e a v e y R o a d 6 t h Ave N Fe r n d a l e R o a d N Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 N Star k e y R o a d Rutledge Road 2 2 n d Ave N Co m m e r c e B l v d Highway 12 E 6 t h A v e N T o n k aw o od R o a d C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 In t e r s t a t e 4 9 4 Highw oo d D r N Arm Dr Wi l l i s t o n R o a d Azure Road B r o w n R o a d N S hor e line Dr Ferndale Road W 19th Ave N M a n o r R o a d O a kla n d R o adFerndaleRoad S Inte rsta te 394 Highway 7 8th Ave N NShore Dr StoneRoad Rice St E W atertownRoad G l e a so n L a k e D r C a r l s o n P k w y N 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Bl vd E Wi l l o w D r N Bayside Road W a y zata B lv d W Ke lley P k w y Lakeview A v e County Road 151 Grays B a y B l v d Ra n c h v i e w L n N Lake Ave Daniels St Ma p l e w ood R o a d LakeStE P k w y 4th Ave N Av o n D r D e v on Dr P a r k Ave S Ln OrchardLn S h o r e w ood L n S t e e l e S t Park St E Grand Ave N o r t h e r n A ve Vine St Do v e L n 2 0 t h Ave N Co u n t y R o a d 8 3 9 t h A v e N Ridge v i e wDr E Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d N Fox St OldLongL ake R o a d M i n n ehaha P l Day Pl H e r i t a g e L n Rai n b o w D r Lyric Ave W Branch R oad R i n ger R o a d Hu n t e r D r Wayzata Blvd Spring H i l l R o a d Temp l e Dr Arco l a L n C ou n t y R o a d 1 5 Crow n Dr E astw o o d R o a d 5 t h A v e N C h i m o W W i l d h u r s t Trl Moline Road Ta m a r a c k D r Wayza t a B l v d W T o go Roa d W Arm Dr R e g e n t s W a l k G a l e R o a d Pea v e y Ln C y g n e t P l Drake Dr Turner Road L i n w o o d Road K elly Ave McGintyRoadW M a n it o u R o a d WilshireBlvd C o u n t y R o a d 1 0 1 ShadywoodRoad G l e a s o n L a k e R o a d C r o s b y R o a d H a r b o r L n N Ba r t l e t t B lv d Hi g h l a n d R o a d Co u n t y R o a d 1 9 Ol d C r y s t a l B a y R o a d S V i n e H i l l R o a d C a n terbu r y D r Donald D r L i n n e r R o a d Du n k i r k L n N W illo w D r S Le a f S t H o l d r i d g e Dr To n k a w a R o a d M c C u l l e y Ro a d C o unty R o a d 1 10N Vi c t o r i a S t B r o w n R o a d S I slan d V i e w D r EastmanLn Ni a g a r a L n N Ed g e w a t er D r Vi c k s b u r g L n N W P o i n t R o a d Lafa y ette R o a d B u s ha w a y R o a d W o o d h i l l R o a d L a k e view Pkwy Le r o y S t St u b b s B a y R o a d N Sussex D r Troy L n N H i l lside D r W 18thA v e N 2 1 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 222324 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 A B CD E FG HI 1A Ma p D o c u m e n t : \ \ A r c s e r v e r 1 \ G I S \ O R N O \ C 1 3 1 1 4 8 1 4 \ E S R I \ M a p s \ L a n d U s e \ O R N O _ 4 E - B _ L a k e A c c e s s P o i n t s _ 1 1 x 1 7 L . m x d | D a t e S a v e d : 1 1 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 3 : 2 7 : 4 4 P M 2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN November 2018Lake Access Points Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Lake Access Points #*Lake AccessPoints Map 4E-2 Council Exhibit G LA21-29 50. 0 © Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Current utilities This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 6/14/2021 10:49 AM 50 Feet Sanitary Manhole Sanitary Manhole (Medina) Sanitary Manhole (MCES) Sanitary Lift Station Sanitary Lift Station (Medina) Sanitary Lift Station (MCES) Sanitary Clean Out Sanitary Termination Valve Sanitary Isolation Valve Sanitary Grinder Station Sanitary Gate Valve Sanitary Gate Valve (Medina) Sanitary Flushing Valve Sanitary Curbstop Air Release Manhole Sanitary Pipe Sanitary Pipe (MCES) Sanitary Service Pipe Sanitary Forcemain Sanitary Forcemain (Medina) Sanitary Forcemain (MCES) Storm Manhole Storm Culvert Inlet Outlet Storm Control Structure Catch Basin Storm Culvert Pipe Storm Pipe Storm Drain Tile Storm Open Waterway Water Tower Water Curbstop Water Gate Valve Water Hydrant Watermain Council Exhibit H LA21-29 365 Westlake Site photos Council Exhibit I LA21-29 365 Westlake Site photos 365 Westlake Site photos AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding lake setback and 75-foot setback hardcover variances to reconstruct the existing “boat building/shed” with a small footprint and height expansion and change the lake boardwalk configuration within the 75-foot setback. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on June 22, and considered to be complete on July 7th. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on September 5, 2021. 3. Background/ Summary. In 2019, Camp TEKO came to the City for approval of a concept Master Plan. Those approvals are reflected in Resolution No. 7003 (Planning Commission Exhibit G). Temple Israel, the owner, has engaged a new architectural firm and are planning to implement the Master Plan in phases. The boat building which is the subject of this current application was not part of the original Master Plan approval, nor was it shown on the plans. Phase One of the Master Plan is underway. Included in Phase One are lake access boardwalk changes and reconstruction of the “boat building” storage shed which require hardcover and lake setback variances. This portion of the project will result in a hardcover increase of 226.5 square feet within the 75-foot setback. The re-built “boat building”/storage shed within the 75’ lake yard is used to house lifejackets, paddles, and other lake use accessories in addition to providing a place for shelter and safe harbor in case of inclement weather. The improvements to this building are intended to facilitate additional storage capacity, a re-worked configuration to allow for both better visibility for chaperones of the campers on the lakeshore and increased floor area to allow for individuals in wheelchairs to be able to maneuver in and out of the building. Please refer to the owner’s revised narrative included with Exhibit A for more detail. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On July 19th, the Planning Commission held the public hearing and had an extensive discussion about the request. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to partially approve the requested variance. The Planning Commission did not find practical difficulty supporting the increase in building size, however seemed to agree that the hardcover reorientation was supported, including a suggestion to place new boardwalk hardcover in the location of the proposed building expansion as noted on Exhibit D. PC Recommendation 5. Public Comment. No comments from the neighbors were received. Item No.: 15 Date: August 9, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000047 – MATCOM: Mark Matasovsky o/b/o Temple Israel of Minneapolis, 645 Tonkawa Road, Variances Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Community Development Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 6. Staff Recommendation. Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover and lake setback variances to accommodate the changes to the boardwalk to improve safety and comply with accessibility regulations. However, staff cannot identify practical difficulties which support the expansion of the boat building footprint. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The applicant has provided some supplementary detail sheets (Exhibit B) and is planning to present additional information relating to the accessibility accommodations in support of the project at Monday’s meeting. Staff is requesting direction from the Council. Exhibits A. Proposed Plans B. Additional Information from the Applicant C. Draft PC Minutes D. PC Recommended Plan E. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 07/19/2021 A. Application & Narrative B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Existing Site Plan D. 2019 Approved Master Plan E. Proposed Building Plans F. Proposed Site Plan G. Resolution 7003 H. Property Owners List I. Plat Map 6' - 0 " 8 ' - 8 " 7' - 3 " 0 ' - 1 0 " 6 ' - 2 " 1 ' - 2 " 2' - 2 " 1 6 ' - 2 " 7' - 2 " 2' - 2 " 8 ' - 2 " 9 ' - 8 " 5 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 2 " 8' - 2" SO U T H E L E V A T I O N EA S T E L E V A T I O N NO R T H E L E V A T I O N W E S T E L E V A T I O N 9 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 8 " 9 ' - 8 " EX I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N SO U T H E A S T V I E W 0 ' - 8 " 6' - 1 " 15 ' - 5 " 1 6 ' - 1 0 " 1 6 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " PR O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N EX I S T I N G A N D P R O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N S 25 6 S Q . F T . 16 9 . 5 S Q . F T . 1 2 ' - 4 " 0 ' - 4 " 1 2 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 8 " 1 2 ' - 4 " PR O P O S E D S O U T H E L E V A T I O N PR O P O S E D E A S T E L E V A T I O N SO U T H E L E V A T I O N EA S T E L E V A T I O N NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1 ' - 4 " 7 ' - 8 " 6' - 5 " 2' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 " 2' - 1 0 " 6 ' - 5 " 9 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 7 ' - 8 " 9 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 9' - 8" 9 ' - 0 " 9' - 0"9' - 8" EX I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N SOUTHWEST VIEW PR O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N EX I S T I N G A N D P R O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N 25 S Q . F T . 41 S Q . F T . 5' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 4 " 8 ' - 1 0 " 9 ' - 0 " PR O P O S E D E A S T E L E V A T I O N 0' - 6"8' - 6"9' - 0"PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATIONSHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEOWNERLOCUS ARCHITECTURE 4453 Nicollet Ave,Minneapolis, MN 55419 Wynne Yelland 612.232.3609ARCHITECT OF RECORD NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT 2020 Locus Architecture, Ltd.03/02/2021 A-001EXISTINGBEACHBUILDINGSTEMPLE ISRAELPERMIT SETCAMP TEKO SWIMMING BEACH BUILDING No.Description Date 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 EX I S T I N G B O A T B E A C H B U I L D I N G 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 EX I S T I N G S W I M M I N G B E A C H B U I L D I N G BOATING BEACH EXISTING BUILDING BOATING BEACH EXISTING BUILDING, NEW BEACH BUILDING OVERLAY BEFORE AFTER LA K E M I N N E T O N K A EX I S T I N G S E A S O N A L DO C K 0 6 0 7 0 9 EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T W O O D D O C K T O R E M O V E 11 12 EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E T O R E M A I N 10 7 S F 17 0 S F EX I S T I N G ST R U C T U R E 16 9 . 5 SF LA K E M I N N E T O N K A 0 6 KA Y A K S T O R A G E MA I N T A I N SA N D B E A C H 0 7 0 9 11 12 NE W ST R U C T U R E 25 6 S F MA I N T A I N S A N D B E A C H EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T BR I D G E T O R E M A I N SE A S O N A L D O C K SE A S O N A L D O C K C O N N E C T I O N SE A S O N A L D O C K HA R D W O O D M U L C H P A T H SA N D B L A N K E T SU R F A C I N G L E G E N D ( N O T A L L H A T C H E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) PL A N T I N G L E G E N D ( N O T A L L H A T C H E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) BOULDER LA K E S H O R E E D G E -IR I S V E R S I C O L O R P L U G 3 6 " O . C . -CA R E X C O M O S A P L U G 3 6 " O . C . -W E T L A N D E D G E S E E D M I X 3 8 L B S / A C (M N D O T S E E D M I X 3 4 -26 1 ) IN S T A L L W I T H E R O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T WOODLAND EDGE -CAREX PENNSYLVANICA PLUG 36" O.C.-CAREX BLANDA PLUG 36" O.C.-WOODLAND EDGE SEED MIX 24 LBS/AC (MNDOT SEED MIX 36 -211)INSTALL WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET UP P E R R E S T O R A T I O N Z O N E -W O O D L A N D E D G E S E E D M I X 2 4 L B S / A C (M N D O T S E E D M I X 3 6 -11 ) LAKESHORE EDGE -IRIS VERSICOLOR PLUG 36" O.C.-CAREX COMOSA PLUG 36" O.C.-WETLAND EDGE SEED MIX 38 LBS/AC (MNDOT SEED MIX 34 -261) FE S C U E S E E D M I X SE E D R A T E : 2 L B S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q . F T . SCHIZACHYRIUM PLANTINGS AND FESCUE SEED MIX -108 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM PLUGS SPACED EQUALLY -20 #1 SIZED SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM FESCUE SEED RATE: 2 LBS PER 1000 SQ.FT. RESTORATION ZONE (STAKE IN FIELD FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL) RI V E R R O C K ( 3 " -7" SIZE)EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS930 930 REVISIONS DATE:DRAWN:CHECKED:APPROVED:PROJECT NO:SHEET:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAW OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME LICENSE NUMBERDATERYAN HERM 07 -06 -2021 55576 CAMP TEKO 645 TONKAWA RD, LONG LAKE, MN 55356BOAT BEACH EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 07/06/21 RLH MWK RLH 270102 L5PERMITDRAWINGS 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 BO A T B E A C H E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 2 BO A T B E A C H P R O P O S E D L A Y O U T SA N D B E A C H EX I S T I N G : 4 4 6 . 5 S F ( E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E , P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E A N D W O O D D O C K A S S H O W N ) PR O P O S E D : 6 7 3 S F ( N E W S T R U C T U R E , P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E A N D N E W S E A S O N A L D O C K S A S S H O W N A B O V E 9 2 9 C O N T O U R ) LA Y O U T K E Y N O T E S KE Y C O N T E N T 02 R E T A I N I N G W A L L ( E X I S T I N G ) 04 B I O - L O G 05 B U C K T H O R N R E M O V A L 06 H A R D W O O D M U L C H P A T H W A Y 07 E X I S T I N G T R A S H R E C E P T A C L E 09 O . H . W . L . ( O R D I N A R Y H I G H W A T E R L E V E L ) ( + 9 2 9 . 4 0 ) 10 F L O O D P L A I N 1 0 0 Y R ( + 9 3 1 . 5 0 ) 11 F L O A T I N G S I L T C U R T A I N 12 S I L T F E N C E 13 E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E 14 A R E A O F C U T W I T H I N F L O O D P L A I N 5 1 5 S F (N O T A L L K E Y N O T E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) HA R D C O V E R C A L C U L A T I O N S 6' - 0 " 8 ' - 8 " 7' - 3 " 0 ' - 1 0 " 6 ' - 2 " 1 ' - 2 " 2' - 2 " 1 6 ' - 2 " 7' - 2 " 2' - 2 " EX I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N 0 ' - 8 " 6' - 1 " 15 ' - 5 " 1 6 ' - 1 0 " 16' - 0"16' - 0" PR O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N 25 6 S Q . F T . 16 9 . 5 S Q . F T . NO N A C C E S S B I L E AP P R O A C H 6" S T E P NO N A C C E S S I B L E CO R R I D O R CL R 2' - 3 " NO N A C C E S S I B L E AP P R O A C H NO N A C C E S S I B L E TU R N I N G R A D I U S NO N A C C E S S I B L E DO O R H A R D W A R E EX I S T I N G S H E L V I N G 3 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 " AC C E S S I B L E A P P R O A C H AC C E S S I B L E TU R N I N G R A D I U S AC C E S S I B L E AP P R O A C H AC C E S S I B L E D O O R HA R D W A R E NE W S H E L V I N G A -002 BE A C H B U I L D I N G A C C E S S I B I L I T Y DI A G R A M TE M P L E I S R A E L CA M P T E K O 3/ 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 BE A C H B U I L D I N G A C C E S S I B I L I T Y 07 / 2 9 / 2 0 2 1 W LA K E M I N N E T O N K A BO A T B E A C H EXISTING STAIRS75 FOOT SETBACK LINEEXISTING CABINS, TYP.PROPOSED ADA PATH 7/19/21BOAT BEACH CONTEXT EXHIBIT CA M P T E K O 1" = 4 0 ' - 0 " 1 BO A T B E A C H C O N T E X T 40'0'8.04.2021 L1 2 L2 1 L2 7/19/21BOAT BEACH CONTEXT EXHIBIT CA M P T E K O SE C T I O N T H R O U G H H I L L S I D E SE C T I O N T H R O U G H E X I S T I N G P A T H 1” = 2 0 ’ - 0 ” 1” = 2 0 ’ - 0 ” 1 2 5% G R A D I E N T EX I S T I N G B O A T H O U S E EXISTING BOATHOUSE LAKE MINNETONKALAKE MINNETONKA EXISTING TREES 5% G R A D I E N T 93 0 ’ 93 0 ’ 95 5 ’ 97 0 ’ 8.04.2021 L2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3. LA20-000047 MATCOM O/B/O CAMP TEKO, 645 TONKAWA ROAD, REQUESTS HARDCOVER, LAKE AND AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCES TO PERMIT RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANDED BOAT STORAGE BUILDING WITHIN THE 75- FOOT SETBACK. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Mark Matasovsky of Matcom o/b/o the property owner, was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis stated Camp TEKO has been operating on the property at 645 Tonkawa since 1965. In 2019, they submitted a Master Plan showing a number of desired future improvements, including new buildings and a new trail network. The owner is working with a new architectural firm and the boat building, which is the subject of this current application, was not part of the original Master Plan approval, nor was it shown on the plan. The Applicant has begun to move forward with the Master Plan. A portion of Phase One, including a lake access boardwalk change and reconstruction of the “boat building,” requires hardcover and lake setback variances. The rebuilt boat building is located 17 feet from the lake and due to its proximity is used to house lifejackets, paddles, and other lake accessories. The project will result in a hardcover increase of 226.5 square feet. The boardwalk increases the hardcover by 140 square feet and the boat building by 86.5 square feet. The Applicant’s practical difficulty analysis and project narrative were included in the packet for Commissioner review. This current request is one of two structures along the shoreline; during the Master Plan review the City Council did not support modification of the eastern building and for that reason Staff cannot support the expansion of this boathouse structure within the 75 foot setback. Staff can support findings that support placement of dock sections providing ease-of-access to the dock in the water given the practical difficulties which include topography and existing site conditions. Staff has not received any comments from the public on this proposal and recommends approval of the hardcover and lake setback variances to accommodate the changes to the boardwalk which will improve safety and comply with accessibility regulations. However, Staff cannot support the expansion of the boat building as noted because practical difficulties are lacking. The boat building can be rebuilt in-kind and if additional storage opportunities are needed the Applicant should consider constructing a new building or expand an existing building located behind the 75 foot setback. If the Planning Commission identifies practical difficulties which support the proposed increase to the footprint and height, a recommendation for approval may be appropriate. Rabbi Marcia Zimmerman noted the camp has been in Orono since 1965 and is one of three congregations in the country within the Jewish tradition that have a camp. She hopes to give her overall perspective on why this is so important. In Judaism they have a sacred text called the Talmud which was written at the same time as the New Testament and says that they are required in their community to teach their children to swim because where the modern State of Israel is there is a lot of water there. Rabbi Zimmerman noted there is also a lot of water around Camp TEKO and no one guessed that Minnesota would have a Jewish population with so much water. Teaching children to swim is survival, independence, and is so crucial. Rabbi Zimmerman stated it is also allowing children with any kind of disability to have access to the outdoors and to learn how to swim, as well. In looking at this project, the first thing they did was look at the lakefront which is very important because they want to have accessibility down to the waterfront, they want kids to be safe, and 60% of their campers are 2nd grade and younger. The idea is that the boathouse and additional hardscape or seasonal docking would make sure that counselors are focusing on the safety of kids rather than carrying down lifejackets and oars, with K- 2nd graders. This boathouse will allow the camp to house all of that safety equipment for very young campers. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mark Matasovsky stated the grade there is incredibly steep and they have a set of stairs that goes up to the four existing cabins. In going back to the 2019 approval, there is a changing building drawn in there. He noted they are leaving the shoreline pretty much as it is with the four existing cabins and the changing building does not exist anymore and they do not even want to build in the bluff setback. They do need a larger life-safety storage area because with Staff carrying life jackets, oars, and items up the hill, the children aren’t being watched. That building would have a tambour door the width of the building that would open up. Mr. Matasovsky showed illustrations on screen of what the new building would look like compared to the old building and noted there would be very little change due to the L-shape of the building. This would allow the Staff to be within the building hanging up life jackets without going up that set of stairs up the hill to the cabins. He noted they received funding for ADA accessibility and a number of paths are changing to have access for disabled children and wheelchairs. The seasonal dockage allows them to get a wheelchair across the sand to the dock and out onto the pontoon boat. The boathouse falls into the same category. He understands the City not liking things within the 75 foot setback so he offered to go back 100 feet and not change anything other if they can just have this 86 feet of boathouse. Bollis understands the seasonal bridge and docks. He asked if this new proposed boat building would be ADA accessible, also. Mr. Matasovsky replied yes. He spoke with the MCWD and they are above the line so they do not need a permit. If one sees the lakeshore, they would not necessarily even know they were there as they keep a pretty low, quiet profile. Bollis asked with the new proposed building, if there was a camper down there in a wheelchair and they needed quick shelter one could wheel them into that building, and they would not be able to do that with the current building? Mr. Matasovsky replied yes. If the Commissioner saw the current building, it is hard to stand up in some spots right now. Gettman clarified if they kept the same footprint and just changed the building, it is the footprint that is the bigger concern for him. He actually lives right across the lake and he does hear, see, and smell all the different things every time the kids go out there. His concern is that it is sacred and with his comments on the previous Applicant, when one comes closer to the lake that is where the Commissioner’s largest discussions come from because then everyone else is going to want to change and it is the domino effect. Gettman is still listening for practical difficulties because the camp could have motorized vehicles taking the kids up and down the hill and they would not have to store as much down there. He noted there are alternative ways. Mr. Matasovsky understands the concern with other homeowners coming in and saying they want a boathouse made into a home, etcetera, but they are not serving disabled or handicapped children under 2nd grade. Gettman asked if this camp is free for all children. Rabbi Zimmerman noted there are a lot of scholarships. Gettman asked if the camp is free for all children. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Matasovsky replied not for all. Gettman stated as they were talking with the previous issue, public access is what they are referring to. He definitely appreciates it and he is not against children. So the Applicant is hearing it loud and clear, he stated they are looking at the overcoming practical difficulties for this. Ressler asked if the current versus proposed building is going any further lakeward than it is currently? Curtis replied no it is not. Ressler knows they have heard this application in the past and noted they are not going any further lakeward or increasing the size of the space and asked if that falls within building in-kind. Curtis noted they are increasing the size and showed on the screen the red is the existing footprint. Ressler clarified the new portion would not be going lakeward but would be going inland. Curtis stated the same point of setback that is existing. Mr. Matasovsky said the existing structure sits on concrete which is poured and the new building would be up on posts so water, air, and everything can pass underneath Ressler is familiar with the property and noted the bluff is right upon them so they cannot go back without digging into the bluff and asked if that is correct. Mr. Matasovsky replied yes, the gradient lines are pretty tight going up and the only spot they have is an emergency vehicle path to bring a large golf-cart/four-wheeler down there in case of an emergency evacuation. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Kirchner understands the good intention of this and the thought behind it, however, he does struggle to approve within the 75-foot lakeshore setback. They have had similar applications for boathouse structures in the past and that has been something the City and this Commission have drawn a hard-and-fast line on for the most part. He respects that there are disabled individuals and young children utilizing the camp and he thinks it is a phenomenal asset to the lakeshore. However, Kirchner thinks they would be ignoring a large factor in that approving this they could potentially have a homeowner come forward who has a disabled individual living in their home, or young children, and make the argument that they need their boathouse amended or improved because of a living situation within their own home on the lake. Based on the Commission’s past history with these types of applications and his opinion with the 75 foot, Kirchner does not believe this is something that he could support but is open to hearing other Commissioners’ thoughts. McCutcheon is the minority on this one and has gone on record multiple times. He noted they had a situation where someone with a boathouse and moved it back and City Council denied it; they just do not want any footprint to change within the lakeshore setback. With this one, there are kids involved, going up that very steep embankment, the Applicant is not asking for a lot, and he would be for approval of this, MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ for the hardcover setback, the lake setback, and expanding the boat building. He likes the camp, he thinks it is an asset to the community, he likes driving by it with his boat and seeing the kids. Anything they can do to make that tradition continue and not turn into a bunch of houses, he is in support of. Ressler echoes McCutcheon. His question for Staff is do they set a precedent because of the different type of property that this is, and can that be something to lean on for approving such an application or does it still set a precedent for a residential application or is there another path they can take for a conditional use permit. Curtis thinks the findings that the Planning Commission cites with any approval or denial are specific to the property that is the subject of the application. She thinks they can craft their findings based on the practical difficulty but specific to the property and how it is used. Ressler continued to echo McCutcheon’s opinion that this is a unique property and its use, character, and feasibility for its campers is something that he is really supportive of. He would much rather see this camp continue to thrive and he thinks this will allow it to do so. He does not think that adding the additional structure will add an eyesore to the lake and is thoughtfully placed within the application. He is in support of the application because it is a unique campsite that is trying to find themselves in compliance with ADA as well as being able to accommodate young campers. Erickson does not see a practical difficulty in this; in order to qualify as a practical difficulty the result must be not for the convenience of the Applicant. When they say the reason they have to be in the 75 foot zone is because of kids running around while they are trying to carry lifejackets, but what he did not hear is that perhaps they should hire more staff to watch the kids. To Erickson, it is for their convenience that they can do these things closer to the lake than they are supposed to be and not take on additional staff to watch the kids. To him, it is a convenience issue which does not qualify as a practical difficulty. Bollis would echo McCutcheon and Ressler, and add that he sees the practical difficulty as converting this so it is ADA accessible not only for campers but also for employees working there. He does not believe the current configuration would be accessible to have a wheelchair come in, navigate the space, and then come back out. He thinks there are unique features to this being that it is a camp and not a private residence so he does not think they are setting a precedent there. However, he would like to note that the Applicant is going away from the lake with the expansion of it, and he also likes that they are not proposing to come closer to the lake. Kirchner’s biggest hang-up is the expansion of the boathouse, he is okay with the boardwalks, it is strictly the footprints of the boathouse. While he generally supports what Commissioner Bollis said regarding making this ADA compliant, he has not heard that the Applicant has tried to repurpose the existing footprint and found that it is completely unusable to make it ADA compliant. Now the Commission is drawing an inference that they think it could not be made that way and he would rather hear that they have tried and realize there is no physical way to make the existing structure ADA compliant. Mr. Matasovsky noted an ADA restroom needs a five foot circle for a wheelchair turn and that L-shaped has no room for a five foot turn in it at all. The new shaped building would allow for a wheelchair turn around. Gettman thought this building was purely for storage and there would not be activities in the building. He asked if someone with a wheelchair would be turning around or if they would just be dropping off lifejackets and oars. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Matasovsky replied at the front door they would be dropping things off, however if someone needed to be brought inside, the lifejackets are being hung to dry above the head. He clarified this year they have 50% camp capacity and they had trouble staffing that amount. Gettman asked if the Applicant has looked at trying to keep that same footprint and updating or upgrading it. Mr. Matasovsky replied they have done some drawings and looked at it. It then causes them to use the staircase and the one building that touches the 75 foot setback, they have to carry lifejackets up the hill and store it there. He noted they have quite a bit stored on the beach and they would like those things stored away and not have them out all the time. Ressler moved, McCutcheon seconded, to approve LA20-000047 Matcom O/B/O Camp TEKO, 645 Tonkawa Road, Requests Hardcover, Lake and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances to Permit Reconstruction of an Expanded Boat Storage Building within the 75-Foot Setback as applied with the condition that the non-existing permanent bridge is to be removed seasonally. Gettman sees that the City will be losing the precedent that they already have, that they have protected and argued about, and he is not hearing the practical difficulty. He does not see any advantage for plugging in the seasonal dock as it will already be removed so he does not see the give-and-take on that. VOTE: Ayes: 3 (Bollis, McCutcheon, Ressler); Nays 3 (Erickson, Kirchner, Gettman). Kirchner is hung up on the practical difficulty for expanding the footprint within the 75 foot setback. He hears the argument that it is a different kind of property but he does have concern that it establishes a precedent. They certainly have children under 13 and disabled individuals that use the lake, so to use that here, he does not know that it entirely fits. Ressler thinks they heard Staff share that same concern and what made him comfortable was that each individual property can be assessed based on its use. The only reason he would be opposed is because they do not want to set a precedent for another property and other applications. To him, it is enough to feel like it does not set a precedent because this property’s use is different. Kirchner noted if the property were to ever change hands and become residential, they now have a structure there that is larger than what is allowed and would be grandfathered in. In 10-15 years down the road is anyone going to remember that the reason the Commission approved this is because of the use of the property? He clarified that even if the Planning Commission approves something, it is just a recommendation to the City Council and they may deny or approve it. McCutcheon noted this is a unique property, the City is pro-business, and it is a community asset. He suggested they could say if this ever became a private property that boathouse would not be allowed. Barnhart clarified no, they cannot. Ressler noted the Council can hear all of the comments made and they will do with it what they want regardless. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 19, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Gettman moved, Kirchner seconded, to approve LA20-000047 Matcom O/B/O Camp TEKO, 645 Tonkawa Road, Requests Hardcover, Lake, and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances and to deny the Reconstruction of an Expanded Boathouse Building Within the 75 Foot Lakeshore Setback. VOTE: Ayes (Erickson, Kirchner, Gettman); Nays (Bollis, McCutcheon, Ressler). The Commissioners discussed allowing hardcover rather than additional structure. Ressler moved, Gettman seconded, to approve LA20-000047 Matcom O/B/O Camp TEKO, 645 Tonkawa Road, Requests Hardcover, Lake and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances with the revision that they would allow hardcover instead of additional structure. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. LA K E M I N N E T O N K A EX I S T I N G S E A S O N A L DO C K 0 6 0 7 0 9 EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T W O O D D O C K T O R E M O V E 11 12 EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E T O R E M A I N 10 7 S F 17 0 S F EX I S T I N G ST R U C T U R E 16 9 . 5 SF LA K E M I N N E T O N K A 0 6 KA Y A K S T O R A G E MA I N T A I N SA N D B E A C H 0 7 0 9 11 12 NE W ST R U C T U R E 25 6 S F MA I N T A I N S A N D B E A C H EX I S T I N G P E R M A N E N T BR I D G E T O R E M A I N SE A S O N A L D O C K SE A S O N A L D O C K C O N N E C T I O N SE A S O N A L D O C K HA R D W O O D M U L C H P A T H SA N D B L A N K E T SU R F A C I N G L E G E N D ( N O T A L L H A T C H E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) PL A N T I N G L E G E N D ( N O T A L L H A T C H E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) BOULDER LA K E S H O R E E D G E -IR I S V E R S I C O L O R P L U G 3 6 " O . C . -CA R E X C O M O S A P L U G 3 6 " O . C . -W E T L A N D E D G E S E E D M I X 3 8 L B S / A C (M N D O T S E E D M I X 3 4 -26 1 ) IN S T A L L W I T H E R O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T WOODLAND EDGE -CAREX PENNSYLVANICA PLUG 36" O.C.-CAREX BLANDA PLUG 36" O.C.-WOODLAND EDGE SEED MIX 24 LBS/AC (MNDOT SEED MIX 36 -211)INSTALL WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET UP P E R R E S T O R A T I O N Z O N E -W O O D L A N D E D G E S E E D M I X 2 4 L B S / A C (M N D O T S E E D M I X 3 6 -11 ) LAKESHORE EDGE -IRIS VERSICOLOR PLUG 36" O.C.-CAREX COMOSA PLUG 36" O.C.-WETLAND EDGE SEED MIX 38 LBS/AC (MNDOT SEED MIX 34 -261) FE S C U E S E E D M I X SE E D R A T E : 2 L B S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q . F T . SCHIZACHYRIUM PLANTINGS AND FESCUE SEED MIX -108 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM PLUGS SPACED EQUALLY -20 #1 SIZED SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM FESCUE SEED RATE: 2 LBS PER 1000 SQ.FT. RESTORATION ZONE (STAKE IN FIELD FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL) RI V E R R O C K ( 3 " -7" SIZE)EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS930 930 REVISIONS DATE:DRAWN:CHECKED:APPROVED:PROJECT NO:SHEET:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAW OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME LICENSE NUMBERDATERYAN HERM 07 -06 -2021 55576 CAMP TEKO 645 TONKAWA RD, LONG LAKE, MN 55356BOAT BEACH EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 07/06/21 RLH MWK RLH 270102 L5PERMITDRAWINGS 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 BO A T B E A C H E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 2 BO A T B E A C H P R O P O S E D L A Y O U T SA N D B E A C H EX I S T I N G : 4 4 6 . 5 S F ( E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E , P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E A N D W O O D D O C K A S S H O W N ) PR O P O S E D : 6 7 3 S F ( N E W S T R U C T U R E , P E R M A N E N T B R I D G E A N D N E W S E A S O N A L D O C K S A S S H O W N A B O V E 9 2 9 C O N T O U R ) LA Y O U T K E Y N O T E S KE Y C O N T E N T 02 R E T A I N I N G W A L L ( E X I S T I N G ) 04 B I O - L O G 05 B U C K T H O R N R E M O V A L 06 H A R D W O O D M U L C H P A T H W A Y 07 E X I S T I N G T R A S H R E C E P T A C L E 09 O . H . W . L . ( O R D I N A R Y H I G H W A T E R L E V E L ) ( + 9 2 9 . 4 0 ) 10 F L O O D P L A I N 1 0 0 Y R ( + 9 3 1 . 5 0 ) 11 F L O A T I N G S I L T C U R T A I N 12 S I L T F E N C E 13 E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E 14 A R E A O F C U T W I T H I N F L O O D P L A I N 5 1 5 S F (N O T A L L K E Y N O T E S A R E S H O W N O N S H E E T ) HA R D C O V E R C A L C U L A T I O N S Date Application Received: 06/22/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/07/2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/05/2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 19 July 2021 Subject: #LA21-000047, MATCOM: Mark Matasovsky o/b/o Temple Israel of Minneapolis, 645 Tonkawa Road Variance - Public Hearing Background Camp TEKO has been operating on the property at 645 Tonkawa since 1965. In 2019, they submitted a Master Plan showing a number of desired future improvements. These include a new program center, program cabins, waterfront improvements, changing rooms, parking, welcome center, maintenance building, entrance monuments/gates, cabin renovations, leader lodge, pavilion, program platforms, new shelters, restrooms, and a new trail and path network. Resolution No. 7003 is attached as Exhibit G reflecting the approvals granted for implementation of the Master Plan. Temple Israel, the owner, is working with a new architectural firm. They are planning on implementing the Master Plan in phases. The boat building which is the subject of this current application was not part of the original Master Plan approval, nor was it shown on the plan(s). The applicant has begun to move forward with Phase One of the Master Plan (Exhibit D page 2). A portion of Phase One (lake access boardwalk changes and reconstruction of the “boat building” (shed)) requires hardcover and lake setback variances. The project will result in a hardcover increase of 226.5 square feet. The re-built “boat building”/storage shed within the 75’ lake yard is used to house lifejackets, paddles, and other lake use accessories. Please refer to the owner’s narrative included as Exhibit A for more detail. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified topography, proximity to the lake, and existing conditions as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances in addition to their specific use accessibility needs and safety concerns. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances to reconstruct the existing “boat building/shed” with a small footprint and height expansion and change the lake boardwalk configuration within the 75-foot setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends partial approval as noted on Page 5. FILE #LA21-000047 19 July 2021 Page 2 of 6 They have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application if necessary. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: This is one of two ‘boat houses’ in the camp. The City Council did not support the modification of the other one during the master planning process. Staff cannot support the expansion of this boat house structure in the 0-75. Staff can support findings that support the placement of dock sections providing ease of access to the dock in the water given, including site topography, and existing conditions as practical difficulties. The overall proposed Master Plan is using the land in a reasonable manner and taking into considerations the unique characteristics of the property. Proposed building shown with Existing Building as RED overlay LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 & 8-1279 – Boat Building Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear / Street 30’ +300’ No Change Side Yard 10’ +300’ No Change Lakeshore 75’ ±17’ ±17’ Average Lakeshore The shoreline curves into the property; the average lakeshore setback is met. Section 78-330 – Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140’ Actual 801,054 s.f. (18.3 acres) ± 1500’@ 75’ / 1500’ @ OHWL FILE #LA21-000047 19 July 2021 Page 3 of 6 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 801,054 s.f. 200,263 s.f. (25 %) 72,718 s.f. (9 %) 3,378 w/in 75’ 123,110 s.f. (15 %) 3,300 w/in 75’ *Overall hardcover calculations pulled from the 2019 application #LA19-000039 Applicable Regulations: Hardcover and Lake Setback Variances (Sections 78-1279 and 78-1680) The use of the 18+ acre property is for a summer camp and the improvements are minimal. Overall hardcover is proposed to be approximately 15% of the total site area where 25% is permitted. Due to the nature of the use, some of the improvements are at or near lake level. The existing boat building is 169.5 square feet and has an “L” shaped footprint. It is proposed to be replaced with a square 256 square foot building (an increase of 86.5 square feet). Within this project area there is 446.5 square feet of hardcover which includes the existing building and different wooden walkways. The project will result in 673 square feet of hardcover in this area, which is an increase of 226.5 square feet. With the exception of the boat building footprint increase the additional 140 square feet of hardcover is the result of the boardwalk type walkways which will allow for individuals with disabilities to better access the building from the lake. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances take into consideration storm water, drainage, safety, protection of sensitive areas, as well as access and mobility options for all of the camp users. The use for a camp on this size property follows the general intent of the ordinance. The enlargement of an existing non-conforming structure is not in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Similar to Orono’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Camp TEKO’s design philosophies include maintaining the natural character of the site, minimizing impacts such as hardcover, grading, tree removal, and the control of storm water runoff to Lake Minnetonka. FILE #LA21-000047 19 July 2021 Page 4 of 6 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The Camp TEKO property is zoned as LR-1B, one- family lakeshore residential district; the camp is an existing conditional use within this District. This District is intended for a combination of medium-residential developments and limited agricultural activity that should not endanger the quality of runoff into Lake Minnetonka. Additionally, this property also falls within the Shoreland Overlay District. The use of the property is reasonable for the size and location of the property. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The property has approximately 1,500 lineal feet of shoreline on Lake Minnetonka. There are additional options for the creation of larger storage buildings. The site topography and beach characteristic make access to the lake change challenging for individuals with mobility disabilities; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Camp TEKO has been part of the community for over 50 years, Camp TEKO can be described as a longstanding piece of the character. The proposed master plan elements are intended to improve on that character. In addition, most of the proposed development is screened by existing vegetation from the lake and surrounding areas. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a summer camp is an existing, allowed conditional use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property has many unique features with multiple wetlands, steep slopes, bluffs and a unique shoreline which is different from the neighboring property owners. Because of the property’s many of natural features, there are a variety of different rules and regulations in place for protection and preservation which may not be in line with all uses. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s historical use and it’s unique natural features including wetlands, steep slopes, bluffs, and the natural shoreline makes it different from the neighboring properties. The land conditions are unique for this property including the limited accessibility to the lake due to the bluff, steep slopes, and beach characteristics. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. This property is located in a residential district but has operated historically as a seasonal camp for children of all abilities. Each specific variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of campers as has been described above. FILE #LA21-000047 19 July 2021 Page 5 of 6 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The use of the property, along with all other proposed elements in the Camp TEKO Master Plan, are intended to improve the health, safety, comfort, and morals of all users compared to the existing camp as it currently exists. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicants have requested the variances necessary to support and improve their use with minimal impact to the surrounding area. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s ), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover and lake setback variances to accommodate the changes to the boardwalk to improve safety and comply with accessibility regulations. However, staff cannot support the expansion of the boat building as practical difficulties are lacking. The City Council denied the previous request to expand the existing storage shed on the east side of the lakeshore near the new swimming piers. The Council did not find practical difficulty supporting the expansion of the existing building on the lakeshore within the 75-foot setback. Instead the Council granted approval to permit construction of a new changing room building near this boat building (indicated with the blue arrow on Exhibit D, page 1), outside of the 75-foot setback. The applicant received a building permit earlier this year to rebuild this storage shed in-kind. The boat building can be rebuilt in-kind similar to the existing storage shed. If additional storage opportunities are needed the applicant should consider an expansion to the approved changing room building to accommodate this storage. If the planning commission identifies practical difficulties which support the proposed increase to the boat building’s footprint and height within the 75-foot setback a recommendation for approval may be appropriate. The boat building’s floor elevation should conform to the Floodplain Regulations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Site Plan Exhibit D. 2019 Approved Master Plan FILE #LA21-000047 19 July 2021 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit E. Proposed Building Plans Exhibit F. Proposed Site Plan Exhibit G. Resolution 7003 Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map