Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-12-2021 Council PacketAgenda Council Meeting Monday, July 12, 2021 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of June 28, 2021 2. Council Work Session Minutes of June 28, 2021 3. Claims/Bills 4. Approval of Lawful Gambling One-Day Permit – Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota 5. Approval of Fireworks Display 6. Approval to Hire Part-Time Officer 7. Approval of the LELS Memo of Understanding 8. Approval of the Embedded Social Worker Joint Powers Agreement 9. LA21-000041 – Thomas and Jenny Wilson, 1955 Heritage Drive, Variances – Resolution 10. LA21-000043 – Eric Luth o/b/o Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, 135 Orono Orchard Rd, Sanitary Sewer Easement Vacation – Resolution 11. LA21-000044 – Lecy Bros. Homes & Remodeling, o/b/o John and Lisa Kaercher, 3297 Casco Circle, – Resolution 12. LA21-000037 – Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, 135 Orono Orchard Rd – Orchard Creek Final Plat – Resolution 13. Appointment of Public Works Supervisor (Streets and Stormwater) Public Comments – (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Presentation 14. Pack 285 Arrow of Light (AOL) Den Finance Director Report Public Works Report Agenda Council Meeting Monday, July 12, 2021 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us Community Development Report 15. LA21-000042 – Mohegan Hansen Arch o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Master Development Plan Approval, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat 16. LA21-000040 – Text Amendment Related to Dock Licenses on Big Island City Attorney Report City Administrator/Engineer Report Mayor/Council Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2021 07-19-21 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Matthew Johnson) 07-26-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 07-26-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-02-21 Park Commission Work Session, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-09-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 08-09-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. 08-16-21 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Dennis Walsh) 08-23-21 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 08-23-21 City Council Meeting, Monday, 6:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 6 ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Matt Johnson, Aaron Printup, and Victoria Seals. Council Member Richard Crosby, III was absent. Representing Staff were City Attorney Soren Mattick, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Public Works Director/City Administrator Adam Edwards, and Finance Director Ron Olson. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA Printup proposed adding item number 13 to the Consent Agenda. 1. MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 14, 2021 2. COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF JUNE 14, 2021 3. CLAIMS/BILLS 4. LURTON PARK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 5. BIG ISLAND PARK ADA TRAIL PROJECT (19-033) – INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE & STATE GRANT AGREEMENT 6. LA21-000035 – DARRIN ROSHA O/B/O ORONO STATION WEST, LLC, 2160 WAYZATA BLVD WEST, SIGN VARIANCES – RESOLUTION NO. 7196 7. LA21-000030 – TOM BERGSTROM, 1509 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, VARIANCES – RESOLUTION NO. 7197 8. LA21-000032 – AL AZAD, 165 BEDERWOOD DRIVE, VARIANCES – RESOLUTION NO. 7198 13. PROVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SPRING PARK BY THE CITY OF ORONO Mayor Walsh noted they will also add item 10b) Presentation from the Westonka Historical Society. Printup moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Richie Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road, is here as a Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) representative. He gave a presentation and said for 2022 the Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) levy is zero across the board for all cities. The reason for this is because they have a lot of money in the AIS reserve fund and it did not make sense to charge the cities this year; the City of Orono will save $11,400 dollars. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 6 PUBLIC COMMENTS – Continued Right now in the reserve funds they have $156,978 and at the end of fiscal year 2020 they have $554,000 which includes the General Fund, the AIS Fund, and an Equipment Replacement Fund which are now combined. He spoke about the Save the Lake Fund which are donations that come in for safety, buoys, and education and he would like to focus more on safety. Mr. Anderson said in 2021 they have two dedicated deputies and they worked to raise $84,000; Hennepin County puts in water patrol but those patrols can be pulled off the water for a riot in Minneapolis or other emergencies. Now they have two dedicated officers who will keep the lake safe. They have started a fundraising campaign for the 2022 budget. He read a letter they wrote to Sherriff Hutchinson which said: At no time in the lake’s history has pressure on lake safety been driven more by demand and diversity of lake use. This unprecedented demand has placed pressure on every aspect of Lake Minnetonka and commands that we elevate safety to our highest priority. It is to this end that we have assembled an alliance of stakeholders to unite financially to help meet the financial need to support the presence of additional dedicated deputies for Lake Minnetonka. It is with great concern for the safety of the lake that we present the enclosed copies of donations made to empower the Save the Lake Fund to continue contracting with you to provide two additional deputies dedicated to Lake Minnetonka patrol. In addition to which, you will find the names of business owners and companies represented that without hesitation or reservation provided these donations. It is important to note that all those who contributed highly regard your office and the vital role you hold in keeping the lake safe and enjoyable. Mr. Anderson noted they asked for donations of $2,500 and some even stepped up with $5,000. He stated the checks keep coming in and noted that roughly half of those have come from Orono donations. He walked the Council through the funding, goals, and fundraising for 2022. Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, noted they have 14 cities on the lake and whatever happens on the lake affects Orono profoundly. He spoke about a time in the 1990’s when they broke up a party on Big Island and Fletcher’s had to close at 9:00 and they experienced a six-figure loss in revenue in one night. When people think what happens on the lake is the responsibility of the County - that is State statute - but he asked at what level of service is the County obligated to provide? With the Orono Police Department having Mound, Spring Park, and Minnetonka Beach, they do get a disproportionate amount of impact. Mr. Jabbour stated they have a selfish reason to keep things under control because they will pay for it one way or another. He stated right now the focus is on Minneapolis unrest; they can be the rich people complaining about noise on Lake Minnetonka but these two auxiliary officers will add more patrol after 1:00 as it is not that easy to get the County to do it. PRESENTATIONS 9. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL REPORT Susan Navratil, President of the Gillespie Center, gave a presentation. The Gillespie Center and Senior Community Services (SCS) have been partners since the 1970’s and twenty years ago, the Westonka Senior Citizens became The Gillespie Center. Senior Community Services provides a Home Program, minor repair services, outdoor chores, and housekeeping. They are Medicare Partners, supporting healthy lives by lifting the burden of copays, deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses so receiving healthcare is more accessible for Medicare beneficiaries. Sarah Roberts, their on-site social worker meets with caregivers and seniors that need services and helps them work through the process. CareNextion.org, MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 6 PRESENTATIONS – Continued developed by Senior Community Services is a free online care team tool that helps caregivers coordinate care of a loved one by assigning and organizing tasks, locating local resources, and journaling visits, updates and progress. During Covid-19 they introduced Virtual Programs including virtual tours of museums, games, puzzles, crafts, and more. The Gillespie Center is run by volunteers and they contract for some of their services through Senior Community Services. Ms. Navratil spoke about the COVID Shutdown Plan, and how they kept staff and community members safe during the pandemic. She noted they had one case of COVID-19 in December 2020, they closed down for two weeks, did a deep clean, and were able to reopen again. She shared their financial picture at the end of 2020 and noted it was pretty dire as there were no fundraisers for a year; member dues and support from the cities go into their Investment Fund so day-to-day operations were close to not having money. Thankfully, 10 years previous a Reserve Fund was started and they were able to tap into that fund which is how they are currently operating. In May, fundraisers began again, and activities continue to return, including the Coffeehouse, Card Groups, Square Dancing, Ukulele Group, Cribbage, Quilters, Movies, Defensive Driving, and Wednesday Lunches. She noted the SCS program served 39 Orono residents, and the Center has 31 registered members from Orono. They are celebrating 20 years in July and are planning an anniversary celebration on October 15, 2021. Mayor Walsh thinks they do a great job and will put it on their calendars in October to come and celebrate. 10a. TOUR DE TONKA – TIM LITFIN Tim Litfin gave a presentation on the upcoming Tour de Tonka on Saturday, August 7, 2021. He noted many major sponsors making the event happen; registration started well and many of those are brand-new to the event. He showed some historical numbers and said they have had riders from 43 states throughout the years. The bikers travel through many cities including Orono and they are looking forward to the Tour. He noted people can ride or volunteer for the event at www.tourdetonka.org. 10b. WESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Liz Vandam, 5816 Grand View Blvd, Mound, represents the Westonka Historical society, stating they preserve and share the history of local areas. During the shutdown, they started phase 2 of their inventory and are supported through a Legacy Grant which enabled them to add 2 more rooms to the history museum which is filled with more exhibits. Families and children are welcome to come to the history center in Mound, and they have a quarterly newsletter where they highlight one of the five cities they represent; she brought some past newsletters for the Council to view. Ms. Vandam stated during COVID- 19, 6 of the 9 historical societies that preserve Lake Minnetonka history gathered together and received a grant and they are looking to form some kind of alliance and perhaps even consolidation to align their strengths and resources rather than working side-by-side. They are always looking for volunteers, working on fundraisers, and will start on a “Pastport” project, and are inviting everyone to celebrate July as Lake Minnetonka History Month. Mayor Walsh thinks it is very interesting to go and take a tour to see the build-up of Mound, what it used to look like, the history of Tonka Toys. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 6 PRESENTATIONS – Continued Ms. Vandam also noted the history of the Indian Mounds which is what Mound was named after; she stated they highlight all of the cities. PUBLIC HEARING 11. LA21-000026 – JALIN DESIGN LLC O/B/O TIM HOLLAND, 1395 ORONO LANE, VARIANCES – RESOLUTION NO. 7199 Mayor Walsh noted they voted at the last meeting to bypass the Planning Commission to come directly back to the City Council without having to go through the entire process again. Staff provided a summary packet of information. Barnhart stated the Applicant is proposing to rebuild a boathouse and a carriage house; the Council had some concerns with relocating the boathouse. The Applicant is now proposing to keep the boathouse in the same location but to meet the flood plain requirements by raising it. The raising of the boathouse requires a variance as they are required to have a 15 foot bench on the outside of the building as a place of refuge so one can be rescued from their property in the case of a flood. That 15 feet is not able to be provided due to the proximity of the structure to the property line and the lake. He noted they are looking for feedback and public comment on that variance. Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. A group of neighbors are present tonight and trying to get more information as to what is being approved. Mayor Walsh noted the Applicant can keep the boathouse in the same location but because it is a flood plain, they must raise it up a couple feet which requires a variance. He noted they will most likely tear down the building, raise the floor two feet, and rebuild. The Applicant clarified it is three inches. Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 6:57 Motion by Printup, seconded by Seals, to approve LA21-000026, 1395 Orono Lane, Variances as presented. Vote: Ayes: 4, Nays 0. 12. ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING FOR MS4 STORM WATER PERMIT City Administrator Edwards stated the City is required to talk about the permit on an annual basis. The goals are to educate interested residents and to receive comments from the public. The storm water permit is part of a multi-layer governmental requirement with many agencies/organizations and many requirements within the City. Ultimately the MS4 permit is a way for the City to protect their waters from construction materials, animals waste, fertilizers, trash, etcetera. The basic requirements of the permit are to have a storm water pollution prevention program, best management practices, and report to the State on an annual basis. It also includes that the ordinance have storm water protection provisions. He noted they have 6 minimum control measures and in 2020 they completed the East Long Lake Trail requirement and parts of that project contributed to improving the storm water protection, as well as putting in a rain garden. Edwards noted they completed erosion control and infrastructure inspection and 113 inspections MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 6 12. ANNUAL PUBLIC MEETING FOR MS4 STORM WATER PERMIT – Continued were completed with 9 major repairs and other minor repairs. They also ran the grass and leaf program, website, and street sweeping (a primary best practice) and they calculate they were able to remove 23 pounds of phosphorus and 47 cubic yards of debris. Regarding the MS4 permit, they are at the end of the renewal process and as of May 6, Orono completed part 2 of that application. Key changes in the permit are increased requirements for volume control on any project that impacts more than an acre, performance based responses to TMDL’s (total maximum daily loads), and the City must track chloride, phosphorous, and other things that are sent into the storm system. Edwards stated they must send reports on what they are doing to improve those situations every year and must also look at snow and ice operation, particularly in the use of and storage of salts. Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Barnhart reported on the Comprehensive Plan amendment that the City Council initiated. The public hearings are scheduled for the Planning Commission later this month and the direction from the Council was to create two new land-use categories so there was not a gap or breakdown in densities. Currently they have a Medium Density Residential which is 3-10 units/acre, an Urban Medium High Density which is 10-20 units/acre, and an Urban High Density which is 20-25 units/acre. He clarified if a project came in at 18 units/acre, they would drop the guided density all the way down to 10 and that would impact the land-use categories. Barnhart is proposing to create a new land-use category Urban Medium High with a range of 15-20 units/acre. He said Eagle Ridge (the project at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard) will be re-guided to Urban Medium High. Barnhart is also proposing to rename the Urban Low Density (3-8 units/acre), which is the City’s current lowest density that has access to sanitary sewer, to Urban Estate Density Residential. He noted they would not be changing the density but just the name. The Urban Medium Density Residential is currently 3-10 units/acre and he proposes it to be 3-8 units/acre which would have no impact to density calculations. Perhaps the biggest change is the area currently classified as Urban Medium High mixed-use density would be changed to Urban Medium with a range of 8-15 units/acre; he noted it does not really impact density calculations but gives that stepped density. Barnhart noted they will start to see public comment on that and he does not anticipate a lot of concern or issues. The initial public hearing is scheduled for the July Planning Commission meeting. PUBLIC WORKS REPORT None FINANCE REPORT Finance Director Olson reported they are working on the budget and they have about 10 applications for the Accountant position. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Mattick has no updates. He noted there have been a number of lawsuits filed and is curious if the Council would like to go into closed session regarding those. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2020 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 CITY ATTORNEY REPORT – Continued Johnson asked to receive an update before the July 12, 2021 Council meeting. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORTS Seals noted they had the opening of Pfeffer Meats. She noted her husband was called to a fire while they were at the meat market and she was left without a ride so the police brought her home; she said the ride- along was great. Seals said the police department has a hard gig, they are good men and women, and the perception is that they are pulling people over left and right and that is not true. She noted they tried and tried but the citizens were too law-abiding to pull over. Printup had nothing to report. Johnson reported that he went with Richie Anderson to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) budget meeting the previous Thursday. It has been a slow-moving ship and Mr. Anderson is making tremendous progress there. He noted it was just the two of them and the representative from Tonka Bay - he stated now someone is paying attention so taxpayer dollars are going to a public good and there is benefit to it and they will have $11,000 more in the budget thanks to Mr. Anderson. The big thing is the water patrol with the officers that the donations came in for. Now, regardless of issues of civil unrest or other Sherriff related activities, they will stay on patrol. He noted it used to be an all-call and Lake Minnetonka would be unprotected, but this puts some resources on the lake. Mayor Walsh asked the community to support neighborhood businesses, as well as the new meat store. ADJOURNMENT Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: _____________________________________ _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Council Work Session Monday, June 28, 2021 5:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Victoria Seals, Aaron Printup, and Matt Johnson. Staff members present were City Administrator/Engineer/Public Works Director Adam Edwards, Finance Director Ron Olson, and City Clerk Anna Carlson. Meeting started: 6:00 p.m. 1. Budget Discussion Finance Director Ron Olson presented the draft 2022 tax levy and overview to the City Council. He explained each department’s plan for the main proposed expenditures. City Administrator/Engineer Adam Edwards noted that the overview does not include capital projects. The ones shown to council tonight have been mainly comprised of general budget options. Mayor Dennis Walsh noted that if the City raised the levy, it could result in keeping the money in the budget, and in turn help protect the city in the long run should it face inflation. Olson presented the position overview shown in the budget workbook. Edwards explained that staff would like to look over the organizational structure of the city as is progresses through the budget cycle. The Council discussed various reasons why adding some of these positions would benefit the City, especially with the addition of the Public Works Facility plans. Edwards noted this was intended to be a brief overview and to gather input from the Council. It will be brought back at a later date to discuss other areas of the budget. 2. American Rescue Plan (ARP) Edwards noted the city will be receive estimated $875,595 to use the funds for authorized expenditures. Edwards would like to pull some of our utility projects forward and use the funds for those, including the County Road 19 Water Main Replacement and Tonkawa Forcemain Replacement Phase 3 & 4. This would allow us to expand some of our other capital fund expenditures. Adjourned: 5:50 p.m. Council Work Session Monday, June 28, 2021 5:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 CITY OF ORONO: ATTEST: ________________________________ Dennis Walsh, Mayor _________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: RJO Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 116629 to 116782, totaling $242,730.31. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #116733 Aspen Mills $5,265.39 Payment for four ballistic vests. #116760 MnSpect $31,251.90 Payment for May 2021 inspection services. #116774 Watchguard Video $4,000.00 Payment for computer hardware for the police body and weapon mount camera system. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Item No.: 3 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Finance Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount KUHL DESIGN BUILD 07/01/2021 115274 111920 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA20-000056 3249 CASCO CI 700.00- Total 115274:700.00- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 116729 06302021 651-49910-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Storm Water 384.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 116729 06302021 101-41900-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Central Services 384.58 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 116729 06302021 601-49400-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Water 384.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 116729 06302021 602-49450-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Sewer 384.59 Total 116729:1,538.35 A 1 RENTAL 07/12/2021 116730 158376 101-45210-415 SOD CUTTER RENTAL GC Golf Course 110.00 Total 116730:110.00 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 07/12/2021 116731 446854598 710-49970-413 PW COPIER LEASE 05/20/21-06/20/21 138.26 Total 116731:138.26 ARTCRAFT HOMES, INC 07/12/2021 116732 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS19-000098 3600 NORT 10,000.00 ARTCRAFT HOMES, INC 07/12/2021 116732 07072021-1 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND - RPS19-000099 3620 NORT 10,000.00 Total 116732:20,000.00 Aspen Mills 07/12/2021 116733 276084 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 1,428.54 Aspen Mills 07/12/2021 116733 276305 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 1,278.95 Aspen Mills 07/12/2021 116733 276306 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 1,278.95 Aspen Mills 07/12/2021 116733 276307 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS Police Department 1,278.95 Total 116733:5,265.39 BCA MNJIS 07/12/2021 116734 661352 101-42110-311 CJDN ACCESS FEE Police Department 510.00 Total 116734:510.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271441 602-16500 21-014 2021 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION 1,153.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271443 101-43280-304 LA18-000072 PENCE LANE Special Services 189.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271444 101-43280-307 ORCHARD CREEK Special Services 213.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271445 101-43280-304 LA20-000030 ORCHARD CREEK Special Services 213.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271446 101-43280-304 LA21-000042 EAGLE RIDGE Special Services 1,136.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271447 101-43170-304 RPS21-000029 BUILDING PERMIT Engineering 71.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271448 101-19999 21-021 TONKAWA FORCEMAIN REPLACEMENT 14,630.50 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271449 601-49400-305 GIS MAINTENANCE WATER Water 365.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271449 101-43170-305 GIS MAINTENANCE GENERAL Engineering 500.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271450 101-43170-304 GENERAL ENGINEERING 06/21 Engineering 677.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271450 651-49910-304 GENERAL ENGINEERING 06/21 Storm Water 90.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271451 435-48974-304 2021 STREETS IMPROVEMENTS 21-001 26,862.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271452 225-45200-530 BIG ISLAND IMPROVEMENT PHASE 1 19-033 12,459.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271453 602-16500 LIFT STATION 15 GENERATOR 1,279.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271454 101-43170-304 21-040 NAVARRE PARKING LOT Engineering 593.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271455 601-16500 21-039 PW FACILITY UTILITIY DESIGN 897.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271455 602-16500 21-039 PW FACILITY UTILITIY DESIGN 897.00 BOLTON & MENK INC.07/12/2021 116735 0271456 601-16500 WALTERS POINT MAIN IMPROVEMENT 21-022 5,305.00 Total 116735:67,529.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 07/12/2021 116736 061421 101-41110-439 COOKIES - 6/14 WORK SESSION Mayor & Council 4.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 07/12/2021 116736 061921 101-42110-402 CAR WASH #261 Police Department 15.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 07/12/2021 116736 06242021 101-42110-201 DVD'S VIDEOS Police Department 48.39 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 07/12/2021 116736 062821 101-42110-437 DMT RECERT - T WITTKE Police Department 75.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 07/12/2021 116736 062921 225-16500 BIG ISLAND SIGNS 3,691.31 Total 116736:3,834.69 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 07/12/2021 116737 062321 602-49450-381 1302 SHORELINE - GAS 5/19/21 - 6/21/21 Sewer 13.07 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 07/12/2021 116737 11130023-2 6 602-49450-381 1302 SHORELINE - GAS 5/19/21 - 6/21/21 Sewer 35.02 Total 116737:48.09 CENTURY LINK 07/12/2021 116738 9524731909-101-45210-321 GC PHONE/INTERNET 6/19/2021 Golf Course 240.37 Total 116738:240.37 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017239 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 324.47 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017289 101-42110-402 265 SERVICE Police Department 405.28 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017318 101-42110-402 #264 SERVICE Police Department 47.45 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017322 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 48.35 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017324 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 48.35 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017325 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 43.30 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017327 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 101.75 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 0017328 101-42110-402 SQUAD MAINTENANCE Police Department 43.30 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 07/12/2021 116739 17304 101-42110-402 #251 SERVICE Police Department 194.44 Total 116739:1,256.69 CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH 07/12/2021 116740 20-00006766 602-49450-387 SEWER SERVICE - 2ND QTR 2021 Sewer 164.00 Total 116740:164.00 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 142700000 101-41900-382 JUNE 2021 UB - PW Central Services 228.88 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 142780000 101-41900-382 JUNE 2021 UB - CH Central Services 863.12 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 142780000 101-42110-382 JUNE 2021 UB - PD Police Department 863.12 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 211355200 6/101-41900-382 JUNE 2021 UB - PO Central Services 84.56 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 212345000 601-49400-382 JUNE 2021 UB - WATER PLANT Water 145.54 City of Orono Utilities 07/12/2021 116741 7450265100 101-41900-382 MARCH 2021 UB - GC Central Services 71.97 Total 116741:2,257.19 CITY OF WAYZATA 07/12/2021 116742 06/30/21 602-49450-387 JUNE 2021 SEWER Sewer 12,295.70 CITY OF WAYZATA 07/12/2021 116742 06/30/21 601-49400-387 JUNE 2021 WATER Water 5,990.15 Total 116742:18,285.85 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 07/12/2021 116743 841918 602-49450-352 ACCOUNTANT ADVERTISEMENT Sewer 120.00 Total 116743:120.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 07/12/2021 116744 64270 321-47000-620 PAYING AGENT FEE - 2010A 475.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 07/12/2021 116744 64271 323-47000-620 PAYING AGENT FEES - 2016A 475.00 Total 116744:950.00 ELMER J PETERSON CO 07/12/2021 116745 060921 - 2 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND SE18-000020 2250 LONGVIE 1,000.00 ELMER J PETERSON CO 07/12/2021 116745 060921 - 4 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND SE19-000014 1960 WEST FAR 1,000.00 ELMER J PETERSON CO 07/12/2021 116745 060921 -3 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND SE20-000005 2445 WOODHA 1,000.00 ELMER J PETERSON CO 07/12/2021 116745 062921 - 3 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND SE20-000003 3250 FOX 1,000.00 Total 116745:4,000.00 FASTENAL 07/12/2021 116746 MNPLY1299 601-49400-227 MARKING PAINT.Water 57.84 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116746:57.84 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 07/12/2021 116747 3270-510675 701-49800-221 BATTTERY FOR 471 149.14 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 07/12/2021 116747 3270-610581 701-49800-240 AIR HOSE COUPLER 18.99 Total 116747:168.13 GEPHART ELECTRIC CO INC 07/12/2021 116748 163074 602-49450-406 LS#18 TRANSFER SWITCH Sewer 550.85 Total 116748:550.85 GOPHER ACE 07/12/2021 116749 6998/1 101-45200-223 PARKS SUPPLIES Parks 12.08 Total 116749:12.08 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 07/12/2021 116750 1060652 601-49400-489 SPLIT DISTRIBUTION Water 568.35 Total 116750:568.35 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA 07/12/2021 116751 3609214008 101-45210-092 BEVERAGES FOR CONCESSIONS RESALE-GC Golf Course 545.76 Total 116751:545.76 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 07/12/2021 116752 1000167809 101-42110-414 RADIO LEASE Police Department 2,398.15 Total 116752:2,398.15 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 07/12/2021 116753 1000167929 101-41600-309 JAIL INVOICE Law/Legal Services 552.09 Total 116753:552.09 JANE SZCZEPANIK 07/12/2021 116754 062621 101-42110-229 EXPLORERS CONFERENCE Police Department 108.38 Total 116754:108.38 KUHL DESIGN BUILD 07/12/2021 116755 111920 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA20-000056 3249 CASCO CI 700.00 Total 116755:700.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount LaPointe Utilities Inc 07/12/2021 116756 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND ROW20-000065 1,500.00 LaPointe Utilities Inc 07/12/2021 116756 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND ROW20-000067 1,500.00 LaPointe Utilities Inc 07/12/2021 116756 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND ROW21-000010 1,500.00 LaPointe Utilities Inc 07/12/2021 116756 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND ROW21-000014 1,500.00 LaPointe Utilities Inc 07/12/2021 116756 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND ROW20-000068 1,500.00 Total 116756:7,500.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR S 07/12/2021 116757 JULY 2021 101-21707 LELS DUES - LOCAL 168 7/2021 317.50 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR S 07/12/2021 116757 jULY 2021 (4 101-21707 LELS DUES - LOCAL 40 7/2021 1,302.48 Total 116757:1,619.98 LUBE TECH ESI 07/12/2021 116758 2651200 701-49800-212 GREASE FOR SWEEPER 460 188.85 Total 116758:188.85 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 07/12/2021 116759 P35705 701-49800-222 UNIT #460 SWEEPER REPAIR PARTS 790.79 Total 116759:790.79 MNSPECT LLC 07/12/2021 116760 8667 101-42400-310 MAY BUILDING SERVICES Building & Zoning 31,251.90 Total 116760:31,251.90 NIH HOMES 07/12/2021 116761 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND LA20-000089 4465 NORTH SH 1,000.00 Total 116761:1,000.00 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 07/12/2021 116762 05/31/21 101-42110-402 05/21 CAR WASHES Police Department 153.78 Total 116762:153.78 PIONEER MANUFACTURING C 07/12/2021 116763 iNV794325 101-45200-223 BEDERWOOD PAINT Parks 491.88 Total 116763:491.88 QUADIENT INC 07/12/2021 116764 N8932316 101-41900-401 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 7/28/21-10/27/21 Central Services 878.94 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116764:878.94 SRIXON SPORTS USA INC 07/12/2021 116765 3134320 101-45210-095 GOLF BALLS Golf Course 420.00 Total 116765:420.00 St. Cyr Johnson Enterprises 07/12/2021 116766 32599-1-353 101-42110-226 UNIFORMS CLEANING Police Department 400.52 Total 116766:400.52 SWANSON HOMES 07/12/2021 116767 07072021 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND RPS19-000039 4315 LAKEVIE 10,000.00 Total 116767:10,000.00 THOMSON WEST 07/12/2021 116768 844597093 101-42110-311 INV. DATABASE Police Department 262.65 Total 116768:262.65 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 07/12/2021 116769 m26556 101-41300-319 CC MEETING MINUTES Administration 445.75 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Inc 07/12/2021 116769 m26556 101-42400-319 PC MINUTES Building & Zoning 273.75 Total 116769:719.50 TWIN CITY SEED COMPANY 07/12/2021 116770 49893 101-45200-223 PARKS SEEDING/FERTILIZATION Parks 889.65 TWIN CITY SEED COMPANY 07/12/2021 116770 49980 101-45200-223 BEDERWOOD FERTILIZER Parks 124.70 Total 116770:1,014.35 UNIFIRST CO 07/12/2021 116771 0900632209 101-41900-407 AIR FRESHENERS BATHROOMS Central Services 13.00 UNIFIRST CO 07/12/2021 116771 0900632209 101-41900-223 MATS - CH & CC Central Services 45.00 UNIFIRST CO 07/12/2021 116771 0900632210 101-43000-404 RUGS Public Works Department 19.50 UNIFIRST CO 07/12/2021 116771 0900632210 701-49800-221 SHOP TOWELS 5.70 UNIFIRST CO 07/12/2021 116771 0900632210 101-43000-226 UNIFORMS Public Works Department 97.12 Total 116771:180.32 US Bank Equipment Finance 07/12/2021 116772 446656217 710-49970-413 COPIERS 596.76 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116772:596.76 VARNER MOBILE SERVICES LL 07/12/2021 116773 8777 701-49800-403 AC RECHARGE - UNIT 429 146.05 Total 116773:146.05 WATCHGUARD VIDEO 07/12/2021 116774 4BOINV0007 101-42110-580 COMPUTER - POLICE VIDEOS Police Department 4,000.00 Total 116774:4,000.00 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 07/12/2021 116775 884658 701-49800-403 TIRE REPAIR 430 45.00 Total 116775:45.00 Woodhill Country Club 07/12/2021 116776 0707221 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND GLA20-00014,15,16 200 WO 4,000.00 Total 116776:4,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 07/08/2021 116777 1000167832 101-42110-414 PD RADIO LEASE 6/21 Police Department 270.05 Total 116777:270.05 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 45 07/08/2021 116778 07012021 101-21705 457 - 07/01/2021 1,691.00 Total 116778:1,691.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT-HCSP-07/08/2021 116779 07012021 101-21718 PEHSCP - 6/27/2021 2,489.44 Total 116779:2,489.44 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 07/08/2021 116780 070120201O 101-21705 OBRA - 6/27/2021 565.45 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 07/08/2021 116780 07012021RO 101-21705 OBRA - 6/27/2021 200.00 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 07/08/2021 116780 07012021US 101-21705 457 - 06/27/2021 980.00 Total 116780:1,745.45 ORCHARD TRUST-MNDCP-ING 07/08/2021 116781 070120201 101-21705 457 - 070121 1,770.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 6/29/2021 - 7/12/2021 Jul 08, 2021 12:42PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 116781:1,770.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREM 07/08/2021 116782 070120201 101-21704 PERA 06/14/21-06/27/21 37,893.09 Total 116782:37,893.09 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 651-49910-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Storm Water 384.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 651-49910-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Storm Water 384.59- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 101-41900-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Central Services 384.58 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 101-41900-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Central Services 384.58- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 601-49400-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Water 384.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 601-49400-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Water 384.59- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 602-49450-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Sewer 384.59 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 06/30/2021 201300 06302021 602-49450-322 6/21 UTILITY BILLS Sewer 384.59- Total 20130090:.00 Grand Totals: 242,730.31 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the Gambling Permit for Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota. 2. Background. The Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota is planning to host raffle on August 7, 2021. Orono City code requires City Council to approve Gambling permits by resolution. 3. Recommendation. The Applicants have submitted all the requested documents and have met all requirements. Staff recommends approval of the gambling permit. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Gambling Permit for Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota for their raffle event to be held on August 7, 2021. Exhibits A. Resolution Item No. 4 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Approval of Lawful Gambling One-Day Permit – Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota Presenter: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING APPLICATION FOR EXEMPT PERMIT OF THE DECODING DYSLEXIA OF MINNESOTA FOR A ONE DAY GAMBLING PERMIT WHEREAS, the Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota has submitted an application to conduct lawful gambling activities; and WHEREAS, the Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota has proposed to conduct a one day gambling activity (raffle) as part of its fundraising activities on August 7, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota is required to obtain approval of the one day gambling activity from the city in which the activity will occur; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has no objection to the conduct of lawful gambling by the applicant, in accordance with law, at the designated location. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does hereby approve the application of Decoding Dyslexia of Minnesota to conduct a one day gambling activity (Raffle) at 1065 Tonkaway Road, Orono, Mn 55356, on August 7, 2021. Adopted at a regular meeting of the Orono City Council this 12th day of July 2021. ____________________________________ ATTEST: Dennis Walsh, Mayor _______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1.Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to ask the City Council for approval of a Fireworks Display permit. 2.FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT Applicant: Pyrotechnic Display, Inc. Activity: Fireworks Display Location: Launched from a barge off shore of 2871 Casco Point Road Date: July 31, 2021 Time: 9:45 p.m. 3.Background. Pyrotechnic Display Inc. has submitted a Fireworks Display application. Orono’s City Code requires the City Council to review all applications involving Fireworks. The applicant has been provided a current list of addresses which are within 1000 feet of the launch site of the fireworks. The applicant has acknowledged that they are required to provide a notice of the date, time, and contact information to all property owners with 1,000 feet of the launch site of the fireworks. 4.City Communications. A notice of fireworks display will be displayed on the homepage of the City’s website. This notice will also be sent out on the listserv, posted to Facebook and Twitter. The notice is provided in the exhibits and communications have been scheduled to go out by July 24, 2021. 5.Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Fireworks Display Permit. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the listed permit requested from Pyrotechnic Display Inc. for the fireworks display scheduled for July 3, 2021 at 9:45 p.m. near the shoreline of 2871 Casco Point Road. Exhibits A.Draft Fireworks Display Permit B.Pyrotechnic Display Inc. Permit Application C. Map of Location of Fireworks Display D. City Communications - Notice Item No.: 5 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Approval for Fireworks Display Permit – 2871 Casco Point Road Presenter: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Telephone (952) 249-4600 ● Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT Date Issued: July 12, 2021 Date of Event: July 31, 2021 Time of Event: 9:45 p.m. Location of Event: 2871 Casco Point Road, Orono Launched from barge off shore of property Applicant/Sponsoring Organization: Becky Hanson, Pyrotechnic Display, Inc. 9405 River Road SE Clear Lake, MN 55319 (320) 300-4823 The following documents are required and on file at the City Administrative Offices: • Approval of the Long Lake Fire Chief. • Proof of insurance in amount of at least $1,500,000. • Diagram of grounds and display discharge site with fallout radius. • Names and ages of display assistants. • Plan for notification of properties within 1000 feet of the display site and along lakeshore (addresses provided). • Plan for verification of weather conditions and delay or cancellation of fireworks display. • Contact Long Lake Fire Chief James Van Eyll at 952-473-9701 (office) or 952- 367-6447 (cell) to make arrangements to meet on site on Friday morning, July 30, 2021 prior to setting up the display. (City Seal) _______________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk 38 20-117-23 23 0002 ROBERT E BREON JULIE C BRANDSMA 2691 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0003 BRYANT SLOSS KIMLOAN NGUYEN SLOSS 2695 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0004 MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER 2875 GULF SHORE BLVD N B-302 NAPLES FL 34103 38 20-117-23 23 0005 SHIRLEY A JUNGELS THOMAS J JUNGELS 7730 LOCHMERE TER EDINA MN 55439 38 20-117-23 23 0006 JOANN SUE GINKEL 2745 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0007 MICHAEL G BASKFIELD SHARON J BASKFIELD 2755 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0009 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 23 0010 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 23 0011 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 23 0012 ANDREW WATSON GABRIELLE WATSON 2776 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0016 JOY A GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0017 MICHAEL MCANALLY STEFANIE MCANALLY 2795 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0018 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0019 RICHARD A PUTNAM 2765 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0001 DAVID L RUNKLE 2684 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0004 DAVID L RUNKLE 2684 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0005 PEGGY L KADLEC 2726 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0007 RANDALL L ENGELHART ELIZABETH A ENGELHART 2715 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0008 DONALD J & DAWN R HEBIG 2735 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0010 LANCE L & RHODA L VICKNAIR 2740 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0013 BARBARA S O'REILLY 2700 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0014 LAWRENCE D PILLAR 6827 CARDINAL COVE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 24 0015 TING FANG LIN 2725 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0016 AMBER M PEIFER 2069 3RD ST N SAINT PAUL MN 55109-4013 38 20-117-23 24 0017 KENNETH R SADDLER SHERALYN K SADDLER 2755 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0018 DONNA L LILE 2765 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0019 JUSTIN J HOLMERS MICHELLE N HOFFMAN 3800 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0020 JEFFREY A SCHUTT PIA E SCHUTT 2750 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0021 JEFFREY LOEHMANN SARA JOHNSON 2710 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0022 DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING 2700 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0025 HARRY E PULVER JR 105 MEADOW LANE N MINNEAPOLI MN 55422 38 20-117-23 24 0033 ZIV & TAL LIBERMAN 2690 CAROLINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0034 MICHAEL DARULA 2696 CAROLINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0040 CATHERINE R & JOEL W SHOOP 2720 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0041 ROBERT T LUND 2732 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0044 JANET C KAUFFMANN 2696 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0045 MARC COHEN 2697 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0046 MICHAEL D REVIER 2691 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0002 DONALD SCHRADER 3704 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0003 JILL R & WILLIAM H KOCH II 3730 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0004 JOHN F KLICK 3703 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0005 ROBERT PRESLER 3709 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0009 ALISA A MILLER 3753 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0010 PAUL J FUHRMAN COLLEEN FUHRMAN 3759 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0011 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0014 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0015 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0016 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0020 PENNY J SAIKI 2874 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0021 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0022 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0023 PENNY J SAIKI 2874 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0026 STEVEN G SIGAFOOS 2900 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0027 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0028 ANGELA L WILSON 2910 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0031 BENJAMIN M MAYER MEGHAN J HERMANN 2914 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0032 EMMA LOU POWELL 2916 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0033 PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE RYAN G KANNE 2920 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0034 JONATHAN A MENTH 2930 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0035 ROBERT G SORENSEN STACI D SORENSEN 2940 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0036 PAUL F JOHNCOX 2948 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0038 ED PEKARIK JR 2990 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0039 DONALD SCHRADER 3704 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0040 JAMES W & PATRICIA DONGOSKE 3700 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0041 PETER M GRAFFUNDER 3630 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 JON DUK KIM & YOUNG HYI AN 4700 COVEY TR MEDINA MN 55340 38 20-117-23 31 0043 SUSAN C STIELOW HOME LLC 3660 FORT CHARLES DR NAPLES FL 34102 38 20-117-23 31 0045 NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN 2975 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0047 MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR 2941 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0048 NANCY G BROWN 2933 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0049 DON ADAMS & SHEILA ADAMS 2927 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0050 JENNIFER L BREKKEN 2690 DEER RUN TRAIL E ORONO MN 55356 38 20-117-23 31 0051 ALYSSA DWYER & ERIC BIERMANN 2915 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0052 TODD M BALAN 2905 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0053 GREGGORY A SMITH MELANIE S SMITH 2895 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0054 LAWRENCE D & KATHERINE ELSEN 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0055 ALYSSA DWYER & ERIC BIERMANN 2917 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0056 R E WOLFE 2871 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0057 ROSEMARY IVERSEN 2835 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0058 D R WELTY & M M JIN 3721 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0060 JERRY & BONNIE MARTINSON 2970 CASCO POINT RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0061 JONATHAN R & AMY R MILLER 2980 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0062 DAVID HEISER JENNIFER ANN HEISER 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0063 CLIFFORD A SWENSON BARBARA B SWENSON 1346 PONCE DE LEON DR FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 38 20-117-23 31 0064 TIMOTHY JOHN OARE LESLIE MARIE DENNIS OARE 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0065 THE CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0066 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0067 DAVID B ADAMS 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0071 MARTI LYNN STEVEN ROBERT GOUDY 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0072 MICHAEL D BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0073 DANIEL CLEMENT PALMER THERESA LYNN PALMER 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0006 RYAN LONGHENRY KRISTIN LONGHENRY 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0007 SPRAY ISLAND LLC 2829 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0008 DAVID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0009 RONALD E DEMSHAR MARGARET L MARTIN 2821 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0010 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0011 KURT & KELLE BOWE 2815 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0012 CHARLES PRICE 4703 FAIRHILLS RD E MINNETONKA MN 55345 38 20-117-23 32 0013 THERESA A NORSTED 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0014 JOHN M BAILEY PATRICIA L BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0015 CAROLE L FROMMELT ROGER H FROMMELT 2805 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0016 SHANE M WELTZIN ELIZABETH H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0017 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0018 COLBY G HAWLEY JENNA M HAWLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0019 GREGORY D/BETH S CZERWINSKI 2801 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0020 TODD J THEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0021 BRIAN SWANSON SAMANTHA ERIN SIMON 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0023 CASCO POINT LLC 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0024 CASCO POINT LLC 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0027 CASCO POINT LLC 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0005 CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 42 0006 HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN LAKE MTKA CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT DISPLAY TO TAKE PLACE JULY 31, 2021 AT 9:45 P.M. Notice is hereby given that the Orono City Council has approved a Fireworks Display Permit for Pyrotechnic Display Inc. to be launched from a barge near the shoreline of the property located at 2871 Casco Point Road in Orono on July 31, 2021 at 9:45 p.m. We have attached a map of the location, time, date, and contact information regarding the event to this notice. Anna Carlson City Clerk FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT - CONTACT INFORMATION Applicant: Pyrotechnic Display, Inc. Activity: Fireworks Display Location: Launched from a barge off shore of 2871 Casco Point Road Date: July 31, 2021 Time: 9:45 p.m. AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to hire a part-time police officer. An opening exists for a part-time police officer after Officer Bill Persell resigned on December 30, 2020. 2. Background. Timothy Wessels is currently employed as part-time Deputy Sheriff with Washington County Sheriff’s Office. Wessel has been with the Washington County Sheriff’s Office since 2008. Wessels is also a firefighter/paramedic with the City of Oakdale. Wessels has an Associate’s Degree from Century College. His Law Enforcement certificate is from Hennepin Technical College. Wessels is excited about the opportunity to work for the Orono Police Department. Wessels is currently licensed with the MN Peace Officers Standards and Training. A conditional job offer has been extended to Wessels contingent on successfully completing a Psychological Exam, a Physical (Pre-employment medical) exam. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend to hire Timothy Wessels as a part-time police officer at the starting rate of $33.00 per hour, with a start date of July 15, 2021, contingent upon successful completion of the psychological and medical exam. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the hiring of Timothy Wessels as a part-time police officer at the rate of $33.00 per hour with a start date of July 15, 2021, contingent upon successful completion of the psychological and medical exam. Exhibits A. Resolution Item No.: 6 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Approval to Hire Part-Time Police Officer Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ A RESOLUTION TO DECLARE THAT THE PART-TIME POSITION HELD BY TIMOTHY WESSELS IS THAT OF A POLICE OFFICER AS DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF PERA PENSION ELIGIBILITY WHEREAS, that Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund excludes part-time police officers unless a resolution is adopted by the governing body to authorize eligibility for coverage in the Police and Fire Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota that effective July 13, 2021, the position Timothy Wessels holds is that of a police officer as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.64, pursuant to which said employee shall become a member of the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 12, 2021. ____________________________________ ATTEST: Dennis Walsh, Mayor _______________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The City of Orono and Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc. (LELS) are parties to a labor agreement. In May a grievance was received from LELS on behalf of an Orono officer. The nature of the grievance was that the officer was denied the 3-hour minimum for attending a department training. LELS indicated that this action violated Article 14 of the collective bargaining agreement. Article 14 states: “An employee who is called to duty during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (1- 1/2) times the employee’s base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the three (3) hour minimum.” After meeting with LELS business agent, union stewards and the officer it was determined that this did not violate Article 14, however there needed to be clarification related to Article 26 & Article 14 of the current collective bargaining agreement. A Memo of Understanding (MOU) between LELS and the City of Orono was drafted to clarify these issues. The MOU has been reviewed by city attorney. The duration of the MOU will follow the existing contracts of December 31, 2022. 2. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval of the Memo of Understanding between LELS and City of Orono COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Memo of Understanding between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc, Local 40 and the City of Orono. Exhibits A. Memo of Understanding Item No.: 7 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Approval of the LELS Memo of Understanding Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., Local 40 AND THE CITY OF ORONO This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the City of Orono (“City”) and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. #40 (“Union”). WHEREAS, the City and the Union are parties to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that governs the terms and conditions of employment for licensed essential employees; and WHEREAS, the parties’ current CBA expires on December 31, 2022, and the parties are not yet in the process of negotiating a successor CBA, and; WHEREAS, the parties recognize that it is desirable to clarify items surrounding training, drive time, call back time; NOW THEREFORE, based on the recitals above, which are incorporated herein, and the parties hereby agree to the following clarifications: 1.Article 26 – Training: Officers attending mandatory training will be eligible for up to 1 (one) hour of paid travel time to training at their regular rate of pay (straight time rate). Drive time will be calculated to the next fifteen (15) minutes, not to exceed 1 hour. Officers attending mandatory training will be eligible for up to 1 (one) hour of paid travel time from training at their regular rate of pay (straight time rate). Drive time will be calculated to the next fifteen (15) minutes, not to exceed 1 hour. 2.Article 14 – Call Back Time: Training of less than three (3) hours in length shall not be considered a call back and is not subject to the three (3) hour minimum. 3.Payroll: Any changes to an employee’s time sheet made by a supervisor, paper or electronic, will be communicated to the employee. The employee can then offer an explanation to the supervisor at their earliest convenience. 4.Duration: The City of Orono and Law Enforcement Labor Services agree to negotiate any extension of this MOU past December 31, 2022. This MOU shall remain in effect until such time as a successor agreement is put in place or both parties agree to an extension of the MOU. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Local 40 By: ___________________________ Its: Steward Date: __________________________ City of Orono: By: __________________________ Its: City Administrator Date: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Its: Steward Date: __________________________ By: ___________________________ Its: Business Agent Date: __________________________ AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. Hennepin County on behalf of its Human Services and Public Health Department is partnering with seven local police departments serving the Lake Minnetonka Area to form an Embedded Social Worker Program. 2. Background. The social worker assigned to this program is hired and employed by Hennepin County. The social worker provides follow-up social services in a manner that most effectively and efficiently supports and protects the physical, mental and behavioral health of the individual. There is a significant need in our communities for this program and the social worker can provide access valuable resources and follow up that the police department is unable to provide. The terms of the contract is two years. The program will be evaluated at the end of the contract to determine what level of services are needed to continue this program. Several other police department in Hennepin County have partnered with other agencies and later determined that the need was greater than anticipated and now have single city contracts. Partner cities in the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) are Corcoran, Deephaven, Medina, Minnetrista, Orono, South Lake Minnetonka and Wayzata. The JPA has been reviewed and approved by our city attorney as well at attorneys from other agencies. 3. Cost. Funding for each department in the JPA is $8,600 annually. 4. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Embedded Social Worker Joint Powers Agreement. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Embedded Social Worker Joint Powers Agreement for two years at $8,600 annually. Exhibits A. Joint Powers Agreement Item No.: 8 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Approval of the Embedded Social Worker Joint Powers Agreement Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding a setback variance for a garage addition. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on May 17, 2021 and considered to be complete on June 1st. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on July 31, 2021. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicants are requesting a side yard setback variance in order to construct a one-story, 218 square foot addition to the existing garage, 20.4 feet from the side property line where a 30 foot setback is required and a 32.7 foot setback currently exists. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On June 21st, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variance. Commissioners noted that the home does not have a basement due to the high water table, and the addition is intended to support storage needs of the property. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the neighbors were received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Plans C. Draft PC Minutes D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 06/21/2021 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan D. Proposed Plans and Elevations E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. Site Photos G. Aerial Photos H. Property Owners List I. Plat Map Item No.: 9 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000041 – Thomas and Jenny Wilson, 1955 Heritage Drive, Variance – Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 FILE NO. LA21 -000041 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2021, Thomas Wilson (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1955 Heritage Drive and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 4, Foxhill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow construction of a 218 square foot one- story addition to the existing garage 20.4 feet from the property line where a 30 foot setback is required; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000041. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 2 3. The Property contains 1.01 acres in area and has a defined lot width of over 300 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 3 and hardcover is limited to 35% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. Side Yard Setback Variance 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The proposed setback variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The Property is substandard and has difficulties due to its small size, shape, and topography. The proposed footprint expansions are screened from adjacent properties by existing vegetation and topography. The encroachment results in a minimal one-story increase the massing of the home. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The variance proposed to increase the size of the residential attached garage on this nonconforming lot is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the small addition to the home on the substandard lot is reasonable. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 3 b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The substandard lot size and the location of the home are existing conditions. The limited yard/open space availability on the garage side of the home is a condition not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variance approval for a minimal building encroachment within the setbacks. The addition has been designed to have minimal visual impact on the most affected side; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The variance is requested in order to permit the creation of additional storage space with minimal impact to massing and minimal encroachments into setbacks, which is reasonable. The project should not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a residence is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The Property’s unique and substandard size and does apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood as the plat of Foxhill was created in 1965 and pre-dates the establishment of the LR-1A zoning district. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 4 9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” The buildable area impacts of the wetland and road encroachment are difficulties unique to the Property. 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” Granting the setback variance to permit the garage addition is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. The improvements will not be substantially visible when viewed from off the Property or from the Luce Line Trail. The setback variances facilitate creation of additional storage space within the property and preserve the property rights of the owners. 11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting the setback variance for the addition in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” The use of the Property has been established with the house. The expansion of corresponding improvements may be considered a convenience to the applicants. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow construction of a one-story addition to the existing garage 20.4 feet from the property line where a 30 foot setback is required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 06/01/2021 and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (July 12, 2022). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 5 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 1 3 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 11 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 2 " CH : 8 ' - 9 " FL A T C E I L I N G W / SL I G H T S L O P E PO R C H F. P . 3' - 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 / 2 " CH : 9 ' - 1 0 " CO N C R E T E GA R A G E HE A T E R 29 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 2 2 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 16 ' - 0 " X 8 ' - 0 " O . H . D O O R 9' - 0 " X 8 ' - 0 " O . H . D O O R 3'- 0 " 3' - 0 " EX I S T I N G ST O R A G E SH E D 3 0 ' S I D E S E T B A C K NE W S T U D W A L L DR A W I N G K E Y : EX I S T I N G S T U D W A L L NE W F O U N D A T I O N W A L L EX I S T I N G F O U N D A T I O N W A L L DE M O W A L L AB 1 . 1 AS - B U I L T MA I N L E V E L FL O O R P L A N As - B u i l t M a i n L e v e l F l o o r P l a n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " AB 1 . 1 1 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A B 1 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 0 9 P M 23 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 5' - 8 1 / 4 " 1 5 ' - 7 " 18 ' - 8 " PE A K H T : 1 1 ' - 3 1 2 " CA R P E T BO N U S R O O M BR E A K HT : 8 ' - 2 " BR E A K HT : 4 ' - 0 " S I L L : 4 ' - 7 1 2 " H E A D : 6 ' - 9 " SI L L : 4 ' - 2 1 2 " HE A D : 6 ' - 9 " SI L L : 4 ' - 3 " H E A D : 6 ' - 9 " S I L L : 4 ' - 3 " H E A D : 6 ' - 9 " F. P . 3'- 4 " 2'-0"2'-0" DE C K D N 9 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 2 " 6 ' - 2 1 / 4 " FL A T C H : 8 ' - 2 " BE D R O O M LA U N D R Y FL A T C H : 8 ' - 2 " NE W S T U D W A L L DR A W I N G K E Y : EX I S T I N G S T U D W A L L NE W F O U N D A T I O N W A L L EX I S T I N G F O U N D A T I O N W A L L DE M O W A L L AB 1 . 2 AS - B U I L T UP P E R L E V E L FL O O R P L A N As - B u i l t U p p e r L e v e l F l o o r P l a n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " AB 1 . 2 1 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A B 1 2 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 1 7 P M CH : 8 ' - 9 " FL A T C E I L I N G W / SL I G H T S L O P E PO R C H F. P . CH : 9 ' - 1 0 " CO N C R E T E GA R A G E 29 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 2 2 ' - 0 1 / 2 " CH : V A U L T E D CO N C R E T E 26 3 S Q U A R E F E E T GA R A G E S T O R A G E AD D I T I O N 20 ' - 0 " 1 3 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 1 4 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 36 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 75 S Q U A R E F E E T RE Q U I R E D F O R WA T E R F I L T R A T I O N EQ U I P M E N T 5' - 0 " 3'- 0 " DE M O F O R OP E N I N G R E L O C A T E W A T E R F I L T R A T I O N E Q U I P M E N T 3 0 ' S I D E S E T B A C K 9'-8 1 / 2 " 3' - 1 " AL I G N 6' - 2 " 3'- 1 " (2 ) 2 4 x 2 4 1' - 8 " F T G 8" F D N 2" S L A B L E D G E 6 1 / 2 " F I N F R A M E D W A L L MA I N L E V E L P L A N N O T E S : -M A R V I N E L E V A T E D O U B L E H U N G W I N D O W S -V E R I F Y A L L W I N D O W , D O O R & C . O . H E A D E R H T S . -W I N D O W S , D O O R S & O P E N I N G S S E T A T 8 ' - 2 1 / 2 " T H I S L E V E L U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . SU P P L I E R T O C O N F I R M E G R E S S & T E M P E R E D L O C A T I O N S . NE W S T U D W A L L DR A W I N G K E Y : EX I S T I N G S T U D W A L L NE W F O U N D A T I O N W A L L EX I S T I N G F O U N D A T I O N W A L L DE M O W A L L A1 . 1 MA I N L E V E L FL O O R P L A N Ma i n L e v e l P l a n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A1 . 11 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 1 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 2 5 P M 15 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 5 1 / 4 " EX I S T P E A K H T : 1 1 ' - 3 1 2 " CA R P E T BO N U S R O O M EX I S T B R E A K HT : 4 ' - 0 " E X I S T S I L L : 4 ' - 7 1 2 " H E A D : 6 ' - 9 " EX I S T S I L L : 4 ' - 2 1 2 " HE A D : 6 ' - 9 " 3'- 4 " G L A S S BO N U S R O O M AD D I T I O N 4 ' - 8 " FL A T C H : 8 ' - 2 " BE D R O O M LA U N D R Y PO P - U P T V 2 - 6 TV 3 ' - 6 " 7'- 0 " 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " ST O R A G E EX I S T P E A K V A U L T E D C E I L I N G P E A K 2 - 6 BO N U S BA L C O N Y 2 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 8'- 1 1 / 4 " 8'- 1 1 / 4 " 1 4 ' - 4 1 / 4 " 16 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 3 0 " G A S F . P . 2 1 " D B U I L T - I N S H E L V E S 2 1 " D B U I L T - I N S H E L V E S ST O R A G E 3'- 0 " GA R A G E S T O R A G E AD D I T I O N B E L O W 2 2 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3 7 ' - 2 " 30 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 2 4 " 2 4 " ( 3 ) 3 6 " x 3 0 " (4 ) 4 0 " x 6 0 " 14 " D x 3 6 " H B U I L T - I N CA B I N E T 4 ' - 1 0 " 1 2 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 4 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " 2'- 0 " SN A C K B A R 7 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " I N S W I N G F R E N C H D R W / T R A N S O M A B O V E 6'- 0 " 1 4 ' - 3 " WO O D D E C K I N G 7 ' - 4 " 1 1 / 4 " SH E D DO R M E R AB O V E 3- 0 3- 0 2 ' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " NE W S T U D W A L L DR A W I N G K E Y : EX I S T I N G S T U D W A L L DE M O W A L L UP P E R L E V E L P L A N N O T E S : -M A R V I N E L E V A T E D O U B L E H U N G W I N D O W S -9 ' - 1 1 / 8 " P L A T E H E I G H T -V E R I F Y A L L W I N D O W , D O O R & C . O . H E A D E R H T S . -W I N D O W S , D O O R S & O P E N I N G S S E T A T 8 ' - 2 1 / 2 " T H I S L E V E L U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . SU P P L I E R T O C O N F I R M E G R E S S & T E M P E R E D L O C A T I O N S . A1 . 2 UP P E R L E V E L FL O O R P L A N Up p e r L e v e l P l a n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A1 . 21 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 1 2 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 3 1 P M 3" 2'- 6 " TO P O F M A I N L E V E L S U B F L O O R TO P O F U P P E R L E V E L S U B F L O O R EX I S T I N G H O U S E 3 12 8 ( M A T C H E X I S T I N G ) 12 1' - 2 " 2'- 6 " TO P O F M A I N L E V E L S U B F L O O R TO P O F U P P E R L E V E L S U B F L O O R 3 12 10 " A2 . 0 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S Ex t e r i o r E l e v a t i o n - E a s t 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A2 . 01 Ex t e r i o r E l e v a t i o n - N o r t h 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A2 . 02 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 2 0 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 8 : 4 8 P M 3 12 6 ' - 9 " TO P O F M A I N L E V E L S U B F L O O R TO P O F U P P E R L E V E L S U B F L O O R PA T C H S I D I N G T O M A T C H 2' - 6 " 8 ( M A T C H E X I S T I N G ) 12 10 " RO O F C R I C K E T AD D I T I O N EX I S T I N G 3 12 10 " TO P O F M A I N L E V E L S U B F L O O R TO P O F U P P E R L E V E L S U B F L O O R EX I S T I N G H O U S E A2 . 1 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S 3. 8 . 2 1 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4. 2 3 . 2 1 IS S U E D A T E WD S 95 2 . 2 5 0 . 1 9 4 1 © 2 0 2 1 W i n d m i l l e r D e s i g n S t u d i o 5. 3 . 2 1 5. 1 1 . 2 1 Ex t e r i o r E l e v a t i o n - W e s t 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A2 . 11 Ex t e r i o r E l e v a t i o n - S o u t h 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " A2 . 12 C : \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 2 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 0 0 : 1 8 P M 13 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 11'-0" 9' - 6 1 / 2 " CH: 8'-9" FLAT CEILING W/ SLIGHT SLOPE PORCH F.P. 3'-0" 15'-1 1/2" CH: 9'-10" CONCRETE GARAGE HEATER 29'-1 1/2"22 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 16'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. DOOR9'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. DOOR 3'-0" 3'-0" EXISTING STORAGE SHED 30' S I D E S E T B A C K NEW STUD WALL DRAWING KE<: EXISTING STUD WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL DEMO WALL AB1.1 AS-BUILT MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN As-Built Main Level Floor Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"AB1.1 1 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A B 1 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 0 9 P M 23'-0 3/4"5'-8 1/4" 15 ' - 7 " 18'-8" PEAK HT: 11'-3 12" CARPET BONUS ROOM BREAK HT: 8'-2" BREAK HT: 4'-0" SI L L : 4 ' - 7 1 2 " H E A D : 6 ' - 9 " SILL: 4'-2 12" HEAD: 6'-9" SILL: 4'-3" HEAD: 6'-9"SILL: 4'-3" HEAD: 6'-9" F.P. 3'-4" 2'- 0 " 2' - 0 " DECK DN 9' - 3 3 / 4 " 6' - 2 " 6' - 2 1 / 4 " FLAT CH: 8'-2" BEDROOM LAUNDRY FLAT CH: 8'-2" NEW STUD WALL DRAWING KE<: EXISTING STUD WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL DEMO WALL AB1.2 AS-BUILT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN As-Built Upper Level Floor Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"AB1.2 1 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A B 1 2 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 1 7 P M CH: 8'-9" FLAT CEILING W/ SLIGHT SLOPE PORCH F.P. CH: 9'-10" CONCRETE GARAGE 29'-1 1/2"22 ' - 0 1 / 2 " CH: VAULTED CONCRETE 263 SQUARE FEET GARAGE STORAGE ADDITION 20'-0" 13 ' - 6 " 1' - 4 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 36'-2 3/4" 75 SQUARE FEET REQUIRED FOR WATER FILTRATION EQUIPMENT 5'-0"3'-0" DEMO FOR OPENING RE L O C A T E W A T E R F I L T R A T I O N EQ U I P M E N T 30' S I D E S E T B A C K 9'- 8 1 / 2 " 3'-1" ALIGN 6'-2" 3'-1" (2) 24x24 1'-8" FTG 8" FDN 2" SLAB LEDGE 6 1/2" FIN FRAMED WALL MAIN LEVEL PLAN NOTES: -MARVIN ELEVATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS -VERIFY ALL WINDOW, DOOR & C.O. HEADER HTS. -WINDOWS, DOORS & OPENINGS SET AT 8'-2 1/2" THIS LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SUPPLIER TO CONFIRM EGRESS & TEMPERED LOCATIONS. NEW STUD WALL DRAWING KEY: EXISTING STUD WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL DEMO WALL A1.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Main Level Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 1 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 1 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 2 5 P M 15'-0 3/4"13'-5 1/4" EXIST PEAK HT: 11'-3 12" CARPET BONUS ROOM EXIST BREAK HT: 4'-0" EX I S T S I L L : 4 ' - 7 1 2 " H E A D : 6' - 9 " EXIST SILL: 4'-2 12" HEAD: 6'-9" 3'-4" GLASS BONUS ROOM ADDITION 4' - 8 " FLAT CH: 8'-2" BEDROOM LAUNDRY POP-UP TV 2- 6 TV 3' - 6 " 7'-0" 3' - 0 " 2' - 0 " STORAGE EXIST PEAK VA U L T E D C E I L I N G P E A K 2- 6 BONUS BALCONY 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 13'-9 3/4" 8'-1 1/4"8'-1 1/4" 14 ' - 4 1 / 4 " 16'-2 3/4" 30 " G A S F . P . 21 " D B U I L T - I N SH E L V E S 21 " D B U I L T - I N SH E L V E S STORAGE 3'-0" GARAGE STORAGE ADDITION BELOW 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 37 ' - 2 " 30'-0 1/2" 24 " 24 " (3 ) 3 6 " x 3 0 " (4) 40" x 60" 14"Dx36"H BUILT-IN CABINET 4' - 1 0 " 12 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 2'-0" SNACK BAR 7' - 4 " 6' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " I N S W I N G F R E N C H D R W/ T R A N S O M A B O V E 6'-0" 14 ' - 3 " WOOD DECKING 7' - 4 " 1 1 / 4 " SHED DORMER ABOVE 3-0 3-0 2' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " NEW STUD WALL DRAWING KEY: EXISTING STUD WALL DEMO WALL UPPER LEVEL PLAN NOTES: -MARVIN ELEVATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS -9'-1 1/8" PLATE HEIGHT -VERIFY ALL WINDOW, DOOR & C.O. HEADER HTS. -WINDOWS, DOORS & OPENINGS SET AT 8'-2 1/2" THIS LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SUPPLIER TO CONFIRM EGRESS & TEMPERED LOCATIONS. A1.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Upper Level Plan 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 1 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 1 2 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 4 2 : 3 1 P M 3" 2'-6" TOP OF MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR TOP OF UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR EXISTING HOUSE 3 12 8 (MATCH EXISTING) 12 1'-2" 2'-6" TOP OF MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR TOP OF UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR3 12 10" A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Exterior Elevation - East 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.0 1 Exterior Elevation - North 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.0 2 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 2 0 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 3 : 5 8 : 4 8 P M 3 12 6' - 9 " TOP OF MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR TOP OF UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR PATCH SIDING TO MATCH 2'-6" 8 (MATCH EXISTING) 12 10" ROOF CRICKET ADDITION EXISTING 3 12 10" TOP OF MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR TOP OF UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR EXISTING HOUSE A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3.8.21 1 9 5 5 H E R I T A G E D R I V E O R O N O , M N 5 5 3 9 1 W I L S O N R E S I D E N C E 4.23.21 ISSUE DATE WDS 9 5 2 .2 5 0 .1 9 4 1 © 2021 Windmiller Design Studio 5.3.21 5.11.21 Exterior Elevation - West 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 1 Exterior Elevation - South 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 2 C: \ 0 0 W D S P r o j e c t s \ W i l s o n \ W i l s o n R e s i d e n c e 5 1 1 2 1 . d w g , L A 2 1 , 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 0 0 : 1 8 P M MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. LA21-000041 THOMAS WILSON, 1955 HERITAGE DRIVE, VARIANCES Thomas Wilson, Applicant, was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 1 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). The Applicants are requesting a side yard setback variance in order to construct a one‐story, 218 square foot addition to the garage 20.4 feet from the side property line where a 30-foot setback is required and a 32.7- foot setback currently exists. The Applicant has identified the unique shape of the lot including the encroachment of a cul‐de‐sac, the location of the existing home in relation to lot lines and wetland areas on the property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties, and should be asked for additional testimony tonight. Staff finds that the lot characteristics create practical difficulties impacting expansion opportunities for the home and garage, in addition to the impact of a substandard size property within a 2 acre zoning district. Staff noted the impact from the encroaching informal roadway cul‐de‐sac, the wetland on the property likely resulting in the home location and orientation, the unique shape of the property, and topography. Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the requested variance to allow the one-story expansion of the garage as shown. Thomas Wilson, 1955 Heritage Drive, added to the practical difficulties listed that because of the water table they also do not have a basement for the property. He has pictures available to show how the topography and how low-set the home is. He currently has 3 stalls for the garage. Gettman asked the reason for going from 3-4 stalls as many people only have 2. Mr. Wilson replied it is not meant for a car. He clarified they are on a well that has some of the highest counts of sediment and minerals in it which he submitted, and they are looking to add a water system that will take some square footage that they do not have a spot for as they do not have a basement. He also has some recreational equipment such as kayaks and paddleboards which would be stored. Ressler asked about removal of a storage shed on the property. Mr. Wilson would love to remove that shed and the items in the shed would go into this addition. Libby noted it is a very unusual lot and was originally suitable for a slab-on-grade small rambler which was close to the marsh. With no basement, they do need some storage and he agrees with the non- conformity of the lot. Vice Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Greg Coward, 1950 Heritage Drive, lives across the street and clarified he has no problem whatsoever with this project. Vice Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Gettman initially struggled with the reasonableness which is why he was asking about the 3-4 stalls but after hearing the water equipment storage needed, he is over that. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Ressler agreed in lieu of a basement, storage becomes a premium. He is in support of the application with the stipulation of the storage shed being removed. Libby moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA21-000041, 1955 Heritage Drive Variances with the condition of removal of the existing storage shed. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 05/17/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/01/2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/31/2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 21 June 2021 Subject: #LA21-000041, Thomas + Jenny Wilson, 1955 Heritage Dr, Variance Public Hearing Background The applicants are requesting a side yard setback variance in order to construct a one-story, 218 square foot addition to the garage 20.4 feet from the side property line where a 30 foot setback is required and a 32.7 foot setback currently exists. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the unique shape of the lot including the encroachment of a cul-de-sac, the location of the existing home in relation to lot lines and wetland areas on the property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds a number of characteristics of the lot create practical difficulties impacting expansion opportunities for the garage, in addition to the impact of a substandard size property within a 2 acre zoning district, such as: the impact from the encroaching informal roadway cul-de-sac, the wetland on the property likely resulting in the home location and orientation, the unique shape of the property, and topography. Application Summary: The applicants are requesting a side yard setback variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE # LA1-000041 21 June 2021 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 – Setbacks: LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Front 50’ 56.1’ No Change Rear (North) 50’ ±90’ No Change Northwest Side (Luce Line) 30’ 32.7’ 20.4’ East Side 30’ 95.3’ No Change Wetland 25’ ±100’ No Change Section 78-305 – Lot Area/Width: LA-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200’ Actual 44,207 s.f. (1.01 acre) ±300’ Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 44,207 s.f. (1.01 acre) Allowed: 8,841 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,314 s.f. (7.4%) Proposed: 3,532 s.f. (7.9%) Section 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 3 44,207 s.f. 15,472 s.f. (35 %) 10,215 s.f. (23.1%) 10,341 s.f. (23.3%) Applicable Regulations: Side Setback Variance (Section 78-305) The proposal includes construction of a 218 square foot one-story addition to the existing garage to improve storage options for the owners. The addition is shown at 20.4 feet from the property line where a 30 foot setback is required. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances FILE # LA1-000041 21 June 2021 Page 3 of 5 where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed setback variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties due to its small size, shape, and topography. The proposed footprint expansions are screened from adjacent properties by existing vegetation and topography. The encroachment results in a minimal one-story increase the massing of the home. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance proposed to increase the size of the residential attached garage on this nonconforming lot is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the small addition to the home on the substandard lot is reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size and location of the home are existing conditions. The limited yard/open space availability on the garage side of the home is a condition not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variance approval for a minimal building encroachment within the setbacks. The addition has been designed to have minimal visual impact on the most affected side; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is requested in order to permit the creation of additional storage space with minimal impact to massing and minimal encroachments into setbacks, which is reasonable. The project should not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residence is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. FILE # LA1-000041 21 June 2021 Page 4 of 5 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s unique and substandard size and does apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood as the plat of Foxhill was created in 1965 and pre-dates the establishment of the LR-1A zoning district. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The buildable area impacts of the wetland and road encroachment are difficulties unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the setback variance to permit the garage addition is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owner. The improvements will not be substantially visible when viewed from off the property or from the Luce Line Trail. The setback variances facilitate creation of additional storage space within the property and preserve the property rights of the owner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the setback variance for the addition in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The use of the property has been established with the house. The expansion of corresponding improvements may be considered a convenience to the applicants. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has reached out to neighbors; to date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s ), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested variance to allow the one-story expansion of the garage as proposed. Staff further suggests the Commission review the existing storage shed located on the northwest lot line, and consider requiring removal or relocation of the shed as it is approximately one foot from the property line where a 15-foot accessory building setback is required as a condition of variance approval. FILE # LA1-000041 21 June 2021 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Aerial PhotosD Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. To adopt the resolution vacating and relocating as existing sanitary sewer easement as part of the future Orchard Creek development. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on May 19, 2021 and considered to be complete on May 27, 2021. The 60-Day review period will expire on July 26, 2021. 3. Background. In the review of the preliminary plat for Orchard Creek (then Orchard Hill), it was noted that an existing but unused sanitary sewer easement bisected one of the planned lots. This application vacates a portion of this easement, and the property owner is providing a new easement that effectively reroute the easement to the proposed property lines, to be used in the event sanitary sewer lines are needed in the future. This relocated easement is illustrated as Exhibit F. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On June 21st, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to approve the vacation. The members of the Commission were in agreement that the vacation made sense, and the replacement easement protects the city down the road. 5. Public Comment. No comments for or against the application have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council adopt the resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. PC Minutes – draft C. PC Staff report D. Easement vacation exhibit E. Relocated easement exhibit F. Original Easement document References PC Staff Report & Exhibits 6-21-21 Item No.: 10 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000043 – Eric Luth o/b/o Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, 135 Orono Orchard Rd, Sanitary Sewer Easement Vacation -– Resolution Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 1 of 5 A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 4160083, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. LA21-000043 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2021, Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for vacation of a portion of the Sanitary Sewer Easement within 135 Orono Orchard Road North, PID 3411823440035 legally described and depicted in Exhibit A, hereinafter “Easement”: WHEREAS, on June 21,2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 6 in favor of and 0 against a motion to recommend approval of the requested vacation; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and WHEREAS, the Orono Council finds the vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The Easement was established in 1975 and has not been used in the intervening years, is not anticipated to be used and as a result the Easement is no longer necessary. 2. There are no drainage or utility improvements within the Easement. 3. The applicant agrees to provide an alternative location for the easement in a location acceptable to the city. 4. The City Council finds that the existing Easement to be vacated has no apparent present or future benefit to the public. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the vacation of the sanitary sewer easement area as described above is hereby granted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 12th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: ________________________ __________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 3 of 5 Exhibit A A 35- foot perpetual easement and a 100-foot width temporary construction easement for sanitary sewer purposes over, under and across the following described property: That part of Subdivision No. 1 of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Subdivision No. 1 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and Subdivision No. 1 of Lot 3, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section: thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right of 36 degrees, 45 minutes from said East line of said Section a distance of 220 feet to the center line of the bed of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka: thence following the center line of the bed of said creek in a Westerly and Southwesterly direction to a point in the center line of said creek distant 180 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said Quarter-Quarter section thence in a straight line Southwesterly to said Southwest corner; thence Easterly to the Southeast corner of said Section; thence North to the beginning. Said perpetual easement being 17.5 feet on each side of the following described line and said temporary construction easement being 37.5 feet to the right and 62.5 feet to the left of the following described line. Said line described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23: thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees, 53 minutes 11 seconds East along the East line of said Section 34 a distance of 815.77 feet to the beginning of the line to be described: thence South 69 degrees, 07 minutes, 45 seconds West 141.60 feet; thence South 45 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds West 119.82 feet; thence South 68 degrees 00 minutes 45 seconds West 167.63 feet; thence South 85 degrees 57 minutes 14 seconds West 508.09 feet: thence South 43 degrees 53 minutes 45 seconds West 569.13 feet; thence South 1 degree 29 minutes 43 seconds West 160.91 feet to a point on the South line of said Section 34 distant 1266.39 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Section 34 and there terminating. The side lines of said easements are prolonged or shortened to terminate on the boundary lines of the above described parcel of land. Also a 35-foot perpetual easement and a 100-foot temporary construction easement for sanitary sewer purposes over, under and across the following described property: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 4 of 5 All of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter-quarter Section distant 457.5 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Section 3: thence running South 67 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 570.5 feet: thence running Southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 333.45 feet to a point on West line of said Quarter Section distant 368 feet North of the Southwest corner of said quarter-quarter section. Said perpetual easement being 17.5 feet on each side of the following described line and said temporary construction easement being 37.5 feet to the right and 62.5 feet to the left of said following described line. Said line is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23: thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 28 minutes 02 seconds West along the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1266.39 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South 1 degree 29 minutes 43 seconds West 615.73 feet; thence South 65 degrees 53 minutes West 336.58 feet; thence South 23 degrees 02 minutes 51 seconds West 300.04 feet and there terminating. The side lines of said easement are prolonged or shortened to terminate on the boundary line of the above described parcel of land. Said temporary construction Easement expires December 31, 1976. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Page 5 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 1 3. LA20-000043 ERIC LUTH O/B/O ONYX PERFORMANCE INVESTMENT LLC, 135 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD, VACATION Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 3 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). Barnhart noted this is a vacation of a portion of an unused sanitary sewer easement that cuts through the Orchard Creek Development at 135 Orono Orchard Road. The proposed plat includes the creation and extension of a new private road that will serve 5 single family residential lots. Because the sanitary sewer easement is not used and encumbers the buildability of this lot, the Applicants are requesting it be vacated. Staff supports that but would suggest that the portion of easement that cuts through the buildable portion of the property be shifted to the south along the boundary line of these two lots so that the ability to provide future connections or extensions of the sanitary sewer system are still available. Once they vacate a project or easement it is very difficult to get one back. The Met Council also seems supportive of the vacation. Vice Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Vice Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Gettman moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA20-000043, 135 Orono Orchard Road, Vacation as applied with the Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Council Exhibit B LA21-43 Date Application Received: May 19, 2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: May 27, 2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: July 26, 2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP, Community Development Director Date: June 21, 2021 Subject: #LA21-000043, Eric Luth o/b/o Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, 135 Orono Orchard Rd, Sanitary Sewer Easement Vacation Public Hearing Background The subject property is part of a platting project for Orchard Creek, a 5 lot single family residential subdivision on 39.4 acres. Much of the land area is wetland, reducing buildable sites to a peninsula in the middle of the property. In the development of the plat, it was noted that an existing easement for sanitary sewer significantly encumbers one of the buildable lots. Noting that this easement was not improved, the applicants desire its’ vacation. Applicable Regulations: Sec. 78-9. - Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this chapter; except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice, all as required by Minn. Stat. § 412.851. The council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as boulevard reserve. Analysis: The Council may vacate any publically owned easement which is not being used. The city has confirmed with the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission’s Application Summary: The applicant is requesting vacation of an existing, but unimproved easement for sanitary sewer services. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the easement vacation by shifting the easement to the boundary between lots 4 and 5, and connecting to the existing easement through the wetland. Council Exhibit C LA21-43 FILE #LA21-43 June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 2 successor, that the easement is not being used. (Exhibit G); It appears unlikely that it will be. The vacation of an easement is final, acquiring future easements in the area can be very expensive and time consuming. Planning staff recommends that a portion of the easement be vacated, and a new easement be created. This is illustrated on the attached Staff’s Exhibit D. This would shift the easement to the property line between Lots 4 and 5, allowing for future sanitary sewer needs in the area. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission identify any issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the easement vacation by shifting the easement to the boundary between lots 4 and 5, and connecting to the existing easement through the wetland. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application summary Exhibit B. Easement vacation exhibit Exhibit C. Final Plat Exhibit D. Staff’s annotated exhibit Exhibit E. Original Easement document Exhibit F. Narrative Exhibit G. Met Council response Exhibit H. Public Notice information M a y 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 - 1 : 0 9 p m - U s e r : m s a l o L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 \ C A D \ S u r v e y \ E x h i b i t s \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 - E X H B T - E S M T V A C A T E . d w g Approved: Drawn: Exhibit Number Project No. Issued: Designed: Rev.: Date: CLIENT ORCHARD CREEK OF ORONO ORONO, MN EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT DL MRS 04/05/2021 1/1 20658.03 DENOTES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 200 Council Exhibit D LA21-43 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 OUTLOT A BLOCK 1 OR O N O O R C H A R D R O A D N O R T H M a y 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 - 1 : 1 0 p m - U s e r : m s a l o L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 \ C A D \ S u r v e y \ E x h i b i t s \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 - E X H B T - S E W E R E S M T . d w g Approved: Drawn: Exhibit Number Project No. Issued: Designed: Rev.: Date: GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION ORCHARD CREEK OF ORONO ORONO, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXHIBIT DL MRS 05/19/2021 1/1 20658.03 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 200 DENOTES SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Council Exhibit E LA21-43 Coucnil Exhibit F LA21-43 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding a lot width and lot area variances in order to redevelop the property. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on May 19, 2021 and considered to be complete on June 3rd. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on August 2, 2021. 3. Background/ Summary. The property is substandard with 0.31 acre in area, and 99.9 feet in width within the LR-1C zoning district where 0.5 acre and 100-feet in width are required. The applicant is requesting approval of lot width and lot area variances in order construct a new home on the property. The proposed home meets all zoning requirements. The lot could qualify as a lot of record, but would be restricted to 25% hardcover. With the variance approvals, they are permitted 30% hardcover (Tier 2). 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On June 21st, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested variances. 5. Public Comment. No written comments from the neighbors were received. During the public hearing, neighbors provided comment generally in opposition to the front setback of the proposed home. The proposed home is shown to be closer to the street than neighboring homes. The neighbors believe it would be out of character with the neighborhood. The front setback is shown to be conforming. For more detail please refer to the attached draft minutes (Exhibit C). 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Proposed Plans C. Draft PC Minutes D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 06/21/2021 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form C. Survey/Site Plan D. House Plans E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. Plat: Winship’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots G. Property Owners List H. Plat Map Item No.: 11 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000044 – Lecy Bros. Homes & Remodeling, o/b/o John & Lisa Kaercher, 3297 Casco Circle - Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-350 FILE NO. LA21 -000044 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2021, on behalf of the owners: John David Kaercher and Lisa B. Kaercher, Lecy Brothers Homes and Remodeling, (hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 3297 Casco Circle and legally described as: Lot 169 and Lot 170, Winship’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow redevelopment of the substandard Property with 13,652 square feet in area and 99.9 feet in width where 21,780 square feet in area and 100 feet in width are required; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000044. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 2 2. The Property is located in the LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.31 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 99.9 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 2 and hardcover is limited to 30% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following: a. Lot Area Variance b. Lot Width Variance 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . .” Single family residences are a permitted use within the LR-1C zoning district. This criterion is met. 2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.” The residential home and associated residential amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. 3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The owners are proposing to use the Property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 3 b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The Property is substandard for the LR-1C zoning district. Due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of the property being platted as part of the ‘Winship’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots’ subdivision in 1884, well before local zoning codes were in effect and the applicants purchase; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” The immediate neighborhood consists of similarly sized lots. The single family residence with associated amenities on a single lot in this neighborhood is not inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Lots surrounding Property are all similarly within Hardcover Tier 2. 4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.” This condition is not applicable. 6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.” This condition is not applicable, as a residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. 8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.” The lot area, lot width, setback, hardcover and lot coverage standards applying to the Property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood. 9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.” T The standards applicable to the Property apply to all other properties in CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 4 the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 30% hardcover that other developed similar-sized lots are afforded, variances to lot area and lot width are required. 10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.” In the opinion of staff, the property rights of the owners will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to have the 30% hardcover that neighboring similar- sized lots are allowed. 11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.” Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” In the opinion of staff, granting of the lot area and lot width variances will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the Property to be developed under the same hardcover and structural coverage allowances as other similar-sized developed lots in the neighborhood. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow redevelopment of the substandard Property with 13,652 square feet in area and 99.9 feet in width where 21,780 square feet in area and 100 feet in width are required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the requirements and standards within Chapter 78 of the City Code. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (July 12, 2022). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 5 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: _______________________________ ________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com Dist a n c e : 99. 9 7 p Council Exhibit B MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4. LA21-000044 LECY BROS., 3297 CASCO CIRCLE, VARIANCES Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 4 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). Curtis noted the subject property is 13,652 square feet in area, and has 99.9 feet in width within the LR‐1C zoning district where 21,780 square feet and 100‐feet in width are required. The Applicant requests lot area and lot width variances in order to take advantage of the Tier 2 hardcover level of 30% in order to redevelop the property with a new home. The proposed home meets all zoning requirements. Staff finds the substandard size of the property is a practical difficulty. The neighborhood consists of single family homes located on individual lots as well as combinations of lots. The ability to have the same type of hardcover amenities as other existing developed properties in the same neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. Libby asked if the variance and increase would remedy the issues for the Applicant. Curtis clarified there is no increase; they are asking to be able to utilize the hardcover Tier that they are located in. Libby said for full disclosure, the corporate entity that he is employed with during the day, has as one of its other agents, a principal of Lecy Brothers. He does not interpret or feel that there is any sort of conflict of interest and would like to retain his ability to vote rather than abstain. Gettman asked to see a more recent view of where the house sits today. Curtis showed the house onscreen. Roy Lecy, representing Lecy Brothers and the client, noted the client bought the home on this lot with the intent of living in it. They hired Lecy Brothers to do a major remodel to the home and once they got into the remodel they found major water leakage in the basement that was not disclosed and the walls were completely covered with mold. Based on the costs to remedy the mold plus the cost of renovation it did not make sense to go forward. Thankfully the client was financially able to build a new home and it is the smallest rambler Lecy Brothers has ever designed. He noted if they move the house forward they may be able to meet requirements but the driveway would be way too steep. Vice Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. Sarah Struck, 3287 Casco Circle, noted she has talked with Mr. Lecy and a drawing she has is a little different than what is on screen. Curtis noted it has changed recently as they were still modifying the footprint location. Ms. Struck asked if they are looking to go from LR1 to LR2. Curtis replied no, it is in the same zoning district as Ms. Struck, and without granting variances they would be limited to 25% hardcover for the development. The area this property is in is a Tier 2 so they are allowed 30% hardcover; the variances are required because City code has two different tracks for developing non-conforming properties. Therefore, they are asking for the variances to address the small lot size which according to the code would allow the 30% hardcover. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Ms. Struck asked if most of the lots are smaller as hers was. Curtis replied yes. Ms. Struck asked if the average is one acre. Curtis noted it is required to be a half an acre. Ms. Struck thinks it is common for lots to be under if that is cited as a hardship. If one turns on this street, none of these houses are on the lake and it is kind of quaint, not super crowded, and she asked to understand how far back the new house would be from the street. Curtis does not know exactly from the street, but the setback required is shown in the dotted grey on screen. The setback required is 30 feet from the property line. Ms. Struck asked if this is consistent with other setbacks in the neighborhood. Curtis replied they are varied and the Applicant is not asking for any variances to any setback or any other development standard other than to address the small lot size. Ms. Struck sees two trees and knows some trees would have to come down. She asked if that is true. Curtis noted there is a possibility they could save those trees, although she does not know whose trees they are along the lot line. Ms. Struck is concerned about the tree. Curtis encouraged Ms. Struck to work with the builder and identify where that tree is with respect to the property line. Ms. Struck’s overall comment is that it is a very wide house within a vertical space. She noted this house was flipped and she called the City when they were building their house to let them know the house next door was being worked on and she did not see any permits. When she hears things like undisclosed water damage, she thinks a lot of things were not disclosed on this house. Someone bought the house without knowing, perhaps it passed inspection, and she is not surprised it is in bad shape and it is really too bad. It pains her to see a bigger house put on this lot and although she cannot do anything about it, she hopes her tree does not die. Curtis clarified the Applicant is proposing to meet all the other standards as far as house footprint, hardcover, and the setbacks are concerned. Ms. Struck noted it is close to her property on the side and while they are up it goes down. The street is being redone this year and she noted a pond in her front yard. Curtis stated if Ms. Struck has general drainage concerns she should reach out to the City Staff. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Ms. Struck stated she has in the past and just wants to make sure with the garage there that there is not more runoff as it is a very different location. She does not want to be concerned with water collection on the street or on her property. Curtis said this is not a final proposed survey but they will have to put a survey together to show how they are managing their drainage and the City Engineer reviews that. Brian Nelson, 3305 Casco Circle, has met the future owner and he is a great guy and would be a great neighbor. However, he has one concern which is all the houses are 100 feet from the street and this one will not be but will be sticking forward quite a bit. Curtis noted it will be about 50 feet from the edge of the street. Mr. Nelson noted it will look quite weird as everyone else is 100 feet back. He thinks it will look goofy and inappropriate. He said one would need to drive by the area to understand. He spoke with Mr. Lecy and received two different plans. The big thing is having a house slid 50 feet ahead of all the other will look odd and that is his complaint. He noted the rest is good and if they can push the house back – great. Ressler noted if they move the house back, they create a new problem because they have more driveway and therefore more hardcover. Mr. Nelson said it creates a big problem backing out on to the street as it is 50 feet out and people cannot see. He reiterated moving it 50 feet forward, in looking at the recommendations it said houses should be set in line with the other houses in the neighborhood. Ressler stated one thing to note within the code and guidance, it is within the building envelope and they could go closer to the street. He thinks they could go closer to the street and Mr. Nelson’s feedback is noted because if the City Council decides it is worth revisiting those setbacks they can consider those amendments. However for now, it meets the criteria to build into that envelope. More often they see an average lakeshore setback, but currently there is not an average setback on the street side. Mr. Nelson noted he read the code and it said it should be with the neighborhood setback. Curtis stated there is an allowance to use the average when the homes are closer but it is not a requirement. Ms. Struck agrees with Mr. Nelson, it would diminish the character and the look of the neighborhood greatly. Vice Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Libby stated regarding the safety of backing out, it looks like from the provision of the driveway surface that there is more than adequate area for the average vehicle to be able to turn around and drive face-out. Ressler noted as proposed it does seem to be within the building envelope and what they must decide on today is whether they are supportive of the 30% hardcover versus 25%. Curtis clarified it is the lot area and lot width variance, they are not asking for a variance for hardcover. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Gettman said from day one on the Commission he has always struggled with the issue citizens have brought up which is the essential character of the locality. This one seems to be almost exactly on point because every single house on the street is set back farther. What is that practical difficulty that they are allowing for this single house to get the exception of moving the envelope forward. He is not hearing it; he is hearing the difficulties of a bad purchase. Curtis wants to be clear that the issue they are debating tonight is that the property is within the LR-1C zoning district (the ½ acre zoning district) which means one is required to have ½ acre to build. She stated they do not have ½ acre. They could build today if they limit the property to 25% and they would move the house closer to the street because they can build without variances as the lot is right now based on the City’s code. Granting a variance allows the Applicant the hardcover that the rest of the properties in the Tier 2 area of setback from the lake are afforded. She clarified they are not debating a setback variance or hardcover variance. They are simply debating: can they develop the lot and is there a practical difficulty. Barnhart stated they see lot area and lot width variances frequently when a property cannot meet all the setbacks. This property met all of those requirements so the only variance really, is the lot area lot width and the only reason they are doing that is so they can be consistent with the hardcover limitations with the neighborhood. Gettman brought up a property by the golf course that used to be a school; that property is just not meant to be built on because where they end up having to put the driveway. His purpose in bringing this up is that the character of the neighborhood is going to be altered because of what they end up doing today. Will it get altered if they do not do anything? Potentially. However, with this they are giving approval for a change to the neighborhood. Barnhart would be very cautious with that kind of comment. Yes, the neighboring property owners can build to the building setback line as this one can. He said to keep in mind whenever a new project comes forward there is an impact to the character of the neighborhood, so he would be very cautious in using that argument to deny a project because anything that happens changes things. He noted the Commission is welcome to make the recommendation of denial but he suggested to be cautious because that can be applied every time and they may back themselves into a corner in analyzing these applications because they are trying to find a reason to not approve it versus being more pronounced. Gettman appreciates that and reiterated with the old schoolhouse, he was the one who recommended approval of that but it was just voicing the concerns to the City Council as the advisory board that the Commission is. He said it is the same thing here. He does not see any reason for denying this; the concern is the fact that it is totally different than all other houses there. Curtis stated to process this variance and for the Planning Commission and City Council to review the variance, the Applicant does not need to provide a footprint or show the plan. They are asking if they can develop the lot according to the code-required standards. Ressler stated perhaps Gettman’s concern is perhaps the City needs to consider a text amendment or something along those lines that may allow a little more clarification and guidance as to character of the neighborhood. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Gettman clarified within the envelope and the setbacks. Gettman moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA21-000044, 3297 Casco Circle, Variances, with Staff recommendation. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 05/19/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/03/2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: 08/02/2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 21 June 2021 Subject: #LA21-000044, Lecy Bros. Homes & Remodeling, o/b/o John + Lisa Kaercher, 3297 Casco Circle Variances Public Hearing Background The subject property is 13,652 square feet in area, and has 99.9 feet in width within the LR-1C zoning district where 21,780 square feet and 100-feet in width are required. This substandard Lot of Record qualified for buildability without area and width variances under City Code Section 78-72, however, a qualifier for taking advantage of the Lot of Record status is a hardcover limitation of 25%. The applicant has requested variances in order to be able to exceed 25% up to the permitted 30% limit, to redevelop the property with a new home. Therefore, lot area and width variances are required. The property, based on its’ proximity to the lake, would be in Tier 2, allowing for up to 30% hard cover. The proposed home meets all zoning requirements. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the substandard lot area and width as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds the substandard size of the property is a practical difficulty. The neighborhood consists of single family homes located on individual lots as well as combinations of lots. The ability to have the same type of hardcover amenities as other existing developed properties in the same neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Application Summary: The applicant requests lot area and lot width variances in order to take advantage of the Tier 2 hardcover level of 30%. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. FILE #LA21-000044 21 June 2021 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1C District Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ Actual 13,652 s.f. (0.31 acre) 99.9’ Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 13,652 s.f. (0.31 acre) Allowed: 2,730 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,611 (19%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 2 13,652 s.f. 4,095 s.f. (30 %) 3,907 s.f. * (28.6%) *Upon approval of the lot width and lot area variances, the developed property will be able to modify the proposed hardcover at the time of the building permit to utilize the 30% limitation without further variances. Applicable Regulations: Lot Area + Lot Width Variance (Section 78-350) The property was platted prior to current local zoning regulations and is substandard with respect to area and width for the LR-1C district. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. FILE #LA21-000044 21 June 2021 Page 3 of 4 According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Single family residences are a permitted use within the LR-1C zoning district. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The residential home and associated residential amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The property is substandard for the LR-1C zoning district. Due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of the property being platted as part of the ‘Winship’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots’ subdivision in 1884, well before local zoning codes were in effect and the applicants purchase; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The immediate neighborhood consists of similarly sized lots. The single family residence with associated amenities on a single lot in this neighborhood is not inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Lots surrounding applicants’ property are all similarly within Hardcover Tier 2. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The lot area, lot width, setback, hardcover and lot coverage standards applying to this property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 30% hardcover that other developed similar-sized lots are afforded, a variance to lot area and width is required. FILE #LA21-000044 21 June 2021 Page 4 of 4 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. In the opinion of staff, the property rights of the owner will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to have the 30% hardcover that neighboring similar-sized lots are allowed. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. In the opinion of staff, granting of the lot area and lot width variances will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the property to be further developed under the same hardcover and structural coverage allowances as other similar-sized developed lots in the neighborhood. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The owners on either side of the subject property have signed the acknowledgement form. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances. If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met for the area and width variances, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. House Plans Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Plat: Winship’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. To adopt the resolution approving the final plat and Development Contract for Orchard Creek. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on April 26, 2021 and considered to be complete on July 7, 2021. The 60-Day review period will expire on September 6, 2021. 3. Background. The City Council approved the preliminary plat for this project via resolution 7119 in September, 2020. Since then, the applicant has submitted the Final Plat application and the required documents and revisions. The City Attorney has drafted a Development Contract, and reviewed the Homeowners Association documents. The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the construction plans. The Finance Director has confirmed that there are no outstanding fees or charged to the property. Permits for the connection to the sanitary sewer system have been approved by the Metropolitan Council. 4. Public Comment. To date, no comments for or against the proposal have been received. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council adopt the resolution, approving the plat of Orchard Creek, adding 5 single family residential lots. Staff also recommends approval of the Development Contract. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend, and authorize Mayor Walsh to sign the Development Contract. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Development Agreement C. Final Plat References LA20-000030 File Resolution 7119 Item No.: 12 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000037 – Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, 135 Orono Orchard Rd – Orchard Creek Final Plat – Resolution Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Consent Agenda CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF ORCHARD CREEK - FILE #LA21-000037 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the “City”) is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter “City Council”) has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2020, Eric Luth o/b/o YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities and Gordon James, LLC submitted an application for approval of a Preliminary Plat for property located at 135 Orono Orchard Road in the City of Orono and legally described in Exhibit A (attached); and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on September 14, 2020 the Orono City Council granted approval for the Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 7119; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2021 Onyx Performance Investment, LLC (hereinafter the “Owners”) Owners, through their agent made formal application for final plat approval for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Owners have agreed to comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 7119 and has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements and conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 7119. 2. Dedication on the plat of perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements as required in Resolution No. 7119. 3. Submittal of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits approving the grading, stormwater management facilities, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control plan. 4. Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 5. Execution of a Development Contract including provision of financial security including a Letter of Credit and escrow to ensure that all site improvements are installed and maintained to the City’s specifications and satisfaction, and to establish conditions for future development of the site. 6. Payment of development fees as follows: Engineering, City Administration (escrow) $ 10,000.00 Park Dedication Fee 22,200.00 Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee 32,240.00 Sewer Connection Charge 26,900.00 Final Plat Fee 500.00 Total Cash Requirements & Fees $91,840.00 WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this subdivision and hereby specify approval of each plan and identify them as part of the official record for Orchard Creek, all attached as Exhibit B: Plat of ORCHARD CREEK Sheet 1: Signature Page Sheet 2: Plat Construction Drawings Sheet 1.01: Title Sheet (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 2.01: Existing Conditions (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 2.02: Demolition Plan (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 3.01: Site Plan (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 4.01: Grading Plan (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 4.02: Grading and Drainage (dated 6-9-21) Sheet 4.03: Grading Notes (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.01 Erosion Control (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.02: Erosion Control (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.02: Erosion Control (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.03: Erosion Control Notes and Details (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.04: SWPPP Narrative (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C5.05: SWPPP Narrative (dated 6-9-21) Sheet C9.01: Details (dated 6-9-21) CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Sheet L3.01: Tree Inventory (dated 6-9-21) Low Pressure Sewer Plans Sheet C1.01: Title Sheet (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C2.01: Existing Conditions (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C3.01: Notes and Specifictaions (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C4.01: Forcemain Plan and Profile (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C4.02: Forcemain Plan and Profile (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C4.03: Forcemain Plan and Profile (dated 4-1-21) Sheet C5.01 Details (dated 4-1-21) All of the above noted plans are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 7119, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of ORCHARD CREEK, Hennepin County, Minnesota (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B) subject to the following conditions: 1. Development within ORCHARD CREEK is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 7119, and subject to the provisions of the Development Contract for ORCHARD CREEK dated July 12, 2021. 2. Upon completion by the Developer of the sanitary sewer improvements as shown on the Construction Drawings (Low Pressure Sewer Plans) within ORCHARD CREEK, subject to final certification by the City Engineer that the work is satisfactory, the City will formally accept the utility as public, and the City will maintain said facilities henceforth. 3. The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. 4. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County on or before December 12, 2021 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the conditions of this Resolution have not been met or the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 12th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: __________________________________ __________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ Exhibit A All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter quarter Section distant 457-1/2 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running south 67 degrees 10 minutes West, a distance of 570-1/2 feet; thence running Southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet, to a point on West line of said quarter Section distant 368 feet North of the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter section. Also that part of Subdivision No. 1 S.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 Subdivision No. 1 S.W. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 and Subdivision No. 1 of Lot No. 3, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Westerly and Southwesterly direction to a point in the centerline of said creek distant 180 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter Section; thence in a straight line Southwesterly to said Southwest corner; thence East to the Southeast corner of said Section; thence North a distance of 374 feet; thence West a distance of 24 feet; thence North a distance of 337.82 feet; thence East a distance of 24 feet to a point 711.82 feet North of the southeast corner of said quarter quarter section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty-five (35) Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the South 711.82 feet thereof and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. There is hereby excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Three (3), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, being a strip of land 43 feet in width and lying northerly of and adjacent to the following described line: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) distant 457 1/2, feet South of the northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running South 67 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 570 1/2 feet, thence running southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet to a point on west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE1/4) distant CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________________ 368 feet North of the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼ NE 1/4.). And, there is hereby further excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the S.E. ¼ of the S.E. ¼ of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Northeasterly direction, a distance of 150 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of said creek that intersects said East line of said Section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty five (35), Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the centerline of said creek and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SAMBATEK, INC. ORCHARD CREEK C.R. DOC. NO. SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter quarter Section distant 457-1/2 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running south 67 degrees 10 minutes West, a distance of 570-1/2 feet; thence running Southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet, to a point on West line of said quarter Section distant 368 feet North of the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter section. Also that part of Subdivision No. 1 S.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 Subdivision No. 1 S.W. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 and Subdivision No. 1 of Lot No. 3, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Westerly and Southwesterly direction to a point in the centerline of said creek distant 180 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter Section; thence in a straight line Southwesterly to said Southwest corner; thence East to the Southeast corner of said Section; thence North a distance of 374 feet; thence West a distance of 24 feet; thence North a distance of 337.82 feet; thence East a distance of 24 feet to a point 711.82 feet North of the southeast corner of said quarter quarter section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty-five (35) Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the South 711.82 feet thereof and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. There is hereby excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Three (3), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, being a strip of land 43 feet in width and lying northerly of and adjacent to the following described line: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) distant 457 1/2, feet South of the northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running South 67 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 570 1/2 feet, thence running southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet to a point on west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE1/4) distant 368 feet North of the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼ NE 1/4.). And, there is hereby further excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the S.E. ¼ of the S.E. ¼ of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Northeasterly direction, a distance of 150 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of said creek that intersects said East line of said Section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty five (35), Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the centerline of said creek and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ORCHARD CREEK, and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use the easements as created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. ONYX PERFORMANCE INVESTMENTS, LLC SIGNED: , as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, by , as of Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires I Mark R. Salo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 . Mark R. Salo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43933 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, by Mark R. Salo. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA This plat of ORCHARD CREEK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _______________, 20_____ and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Orono, Minnesota By: Mayor By: Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By: , Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of ORCHARD CREEK was recorded in this office this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, at ______ o'clock ____ .M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder By: , Deputy B L O C K 1 Line Table Line # L1 L2 Length 88.52 81.89 Direction N68°17'16"E N68°17'16"E OUTLOT A 1 2 3 4 Curve Table Curve # C1 C2 C3 Length L=55.10 L=50.76 L=50.30 Radius R=423.00 R=423.00 R=423.00 Delta Δ=7°27'47" Δ=6°52'34" Δ=6°48'47" ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH 5 SITE ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SAMBATEK, INC. ORCHARD CREEK C.R. DOC. NO. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS N.T.S. SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 & SECTIONS 34 & 35, T. 118, R. 23, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 43933. DENOTES MONUMENT NOT SET, PROPERTY CORNER WITHIN ROADWAY. DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND. DENOTES COMPUTED SECTION CORNER. DENOTES OPEN 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST. 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 80 160 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING PLAT BOUNDARY LINES AND LOT LINES ADJOINING OUTLOT A, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 10 5 5 10 Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C1-TITLE.dwg C1.01 TITLE SHEET Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update DEVELOPER/OWNER GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 ORONO, MN 55359 TEL 763-479-3117 CONTACT: JOE MCPHERSON CIVIL ENGINEER SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: ERIC LUTH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: JOSH MCKINNEY SURVEYOR SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: MARK SALO for Final Site Development Plans ORCHARD CREEK Gordon James Construction Orono, Minnesota Presented by: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP SITE CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: N.T.S. CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2013) MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2018 EDITION) GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS LUCE L I N E S T A T E T R A I L 12 O R O N O O R C H A R D R D SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE SHEET C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.02 DEMOLITION PLAN C3.01 SITE PLAN C4.01 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C4.02 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4.03 GRADING NOTES C5.01 PHASE I EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.02 PHASE II EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.02A RESTORATION PLAN C5.03 EROSION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C5.04 SWPPP NARRATIVE C5.05 SWPPP NARRATIVE C8.01 STREET PLAN & PROFILE C9.01 DETAILS L3.01 TREE - TREE INVENTORY PLAN L3.02 TREE INVENTORY DATA 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NGVD29. BENCHMARK #1 TNH NEAR MAIN ENTRANCE IN CURB ELEV.= 955.34 BENCHMARK #2 FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.= 982.01 BENCHMARKS S U B D I V I S I O N N O . 1 S E 1 / 4 O F S E 1 / 4 SCALE IN FEET 0 200100 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C2-EXC.dwg C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 1.SUBJECT PROPERTY'S ADDRESS IS 135 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 3411823440035. 2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 39.64 ACRES OR 1,723,547 SQUARE FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF CREEK. 3. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED RR-1B (ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL- 2 ACRES), PER THE CITY OF ORONO'S ZONING MAP DATED SEPTEMBER 2019. 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N00°01'40'E FOR THE WEST LINE OF THE NE 14 OF NE 14 SECTION 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 04/17/2020. FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 47481 ELECTRIC METER LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FLARED END SECTION ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST SIGN TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING LINE BUILDING CANOPY CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NGVD29. BENCHMARK #1 TNH NEAR MAIN ENTRANCE IN CURB ELEV.= 955.34 BENCHMARK #2 FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.= 982.01 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter quarter Section distant 457-1/2 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running south 67 degrees 10 minutes West, a distance of 570-1/2 feet; thence running Southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet, to a point on West line of said quarter Section distant 368 feet North of the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter section. Also that part of Subdivision No. 1 S.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 Subdivision No. 1 S.W. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 and Subdivision No. 1 of Lot No. 3, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Westerly and Southwesterly direction to a point in the centerline of said creek distant 180 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter Section; thence in a straight line Southwesterly to said Southwest corner; thence East to the Southeast corner of said Section; thence North a distance of 374 feet; thence West a distance of 24 feet; thence North a distance of 337.82 feet; thence East a distance of 24 feet to a point 711.82 feet North of the southeast corner of said quarter quarter section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty-five (35) Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the South 711.82 feet thereof and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. There is hereby excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Three (3), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, being a strip of land 43 feet in width and lying northerly of and adjacent to the following described line: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) distant 457 1/2, feet South of the northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running South 67 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 570 1/2 feet, thence running southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet to a point on west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE1/4) distant 368 feet North of the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼ NE 1/4.). And, there is hereby further excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the S.E. ¼ of the S.E. ¼ of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Northeasterly direction, a distance of 150 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of said creek that intersects said East line of said Section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty five (35), Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the centerline of said creek and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C2-DEMO.dwg C2.02 DEMOLITION PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. LEGEND DEMOLITION NOTES 1.DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK. 2.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PREPARED BY XXXX DATED XX-XX-XXXX. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 4.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. 6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO EXISTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES' FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FOR SERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 8.CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 9.THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDING INCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS. 10.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 11.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES. 12.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES. 13.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 15.CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16.ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFIC AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 18.CONNECTION TO ORONO ORCHARD ROAD MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY WORK. EXTENTS OF REMOVALS SHALL BE MARKED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT AND CONCRETE REMOVED TO NEAREST JOINT FOR CLEAN MATCH LINES. 19.THE CONDITION OF THE HAUL ROUTE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK AND VERIFIED WITH VIDEO OR PICTURES. ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC STREETS AFTER WORK COMMENCES SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR. UNDERGROUND GAS STONE RETAINING WALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN WATERMAIN DRAIN TILE STORM SEWER LIGHT HYDRANT GAS METER SPRINKLER HEAD SPRINKLER VALVE GUARD RAIL HANDRAIL EDGE OF TREES TREES / SHRUBS CONCRETE SIGNS CONCRETE CURB BUILDING REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING SAW CUT EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE EXIST CONCRETE CURB REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 100' Principal Structure Setback from Long Lake Creek 20' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP GFE=982.0 FFE=983.0 LFE=974.0 GFE=958.0 FFE=959.0 LFE=950.0 GFE=955.0 FFE=956.0 LFE=947.0 GFE=949.5 FFE=951.5 LFE=942.5 GFE=956.0 FFE=957.0 LFE=948.0 BOTHWLOUTORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L A 2 4 ' R40 ' 952.73 HP 9 5 4 . 1 951.2 952.5 949.0 948.5 948.5 949 . 5 9 5 1 . 3 9 5 3 . 1 5 0 ' R O W LONG LAKE CREEK C B A A A A SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C3-SITE.dwg C3.01 SITE PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. AREA GROSS SITE AREA LESS OUTLOT A NET SITE AREA LOT SUMMARY AVERAGE LOT SIZE MINIMUM LOT SIZE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE NUMBER OF LOTS OUTLOTS SETBACKS FRONT YARD REAR YARD SIDE YARD ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE EDGE OF BITUMINOUS TO EDGE OF BITUMINOUS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS 8.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHT POLE. 9.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS. 10.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). THE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE 2.08% (1:48). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 11."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY. 12.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SAWCUT LINE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT NOTES KEY NOTES WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE A.POSSIBLE FUTURE HOME AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION B.EXISTING EASEMENT TO BE VACATED C.PROPOSED EASEMENT 1,726,598 SF 39.64 AC 40,550 SF 0.93 AC 1,686,043 SF 38.71 AC 1,674,911 SF 38.45 AC 91,935 SF 2.11 AC 728,385 SF 16.72 AC 5 1 35 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET RR-1B (ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL) RR-1B (ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL) XX XX PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) WBPWETLAND BUFFER SIGN LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 E O F 9 4 8 . 8 6 100' Principal Structure Setback from Long Lake Creek 20' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP GFE=982.0 FFE=983.0 LFE=974.0 GFE=958.0 FFE=959.0 LFE=950.0 GFE=955.0 FFE=956.0 LFE=947.0 GFE=949.5 FFE=951.5 LFE=942.5 GFE=956.0 FFE=957.0 LFE=948.0 946 950948 950 950 952 95 2 948 946 946 BOTHWLOUT 958 956 95 4 952 950 946944 948 9 5 0 ORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L 948.14 948.86 95 0 9 5 2 946 948 954952 950 9 5 4 . 1 951.2 952.5 949.0 948.5 948.5 949 . 5 9 5 1 . 3 9 5 3 . 1 952.73 HP 42 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.95% FES 100 IE=941.2 OCS 101 SEE DETAIL SHEET C9.01 APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 5.3% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 2.0% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 2.0% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 8.0% 10% MAX. APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = VARIES 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION GRADE ROAD AND SHOULDER TO DRAIN NORTH TO BASIN 8" DRAINTILE TYP. SEE BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL SHEET C9.01 T W:947.1 BW:944.0 T W:947.1 BW:946.5 TW:946.8 BW:946.0 TW:947.0 BW:944.0 TW:955.0 BW:954.5 TW:954.9 BW:952.1 T W:953.8 BW:952.3 TW:953.1 BW:953.6 CLEANOUT (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET C9.01 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C4-GRADE.dwg C4.01 OVERALL GRADING PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 902.5 X 902 SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE STORM SEWER SOIL BORINGS DRAINTILE EOF 902.5 D LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE GUTTERS TO BE INSTALLED TO COLLECT HOME IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF AND SHALL DRAIN TO FRONT SIDE OF HOME. RUNOFF TO BE CONVEYED W/ APPROXIMATELY 220 LF OF DRAINTILE @ 3.6% TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION START IE= 956.0 APPROX END IE=948.0 APPROX GUTTERS TO BE INSTALLED TO COLLECT HOME IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF AND SHALL DRAIN TO FRONT SIDE OF HOME. RUNOFF TO BE CONVEYED W/ APPROXIMATELY 52 LF OF DRAINTILE @ 3.8% TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION START IE= 952.0 APPROX END IE=950.0 APPROX GUTTERS TO BE INSTALLED TO COLLECT HOME IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF AND SHALL DRAIN TO FRONT SIDE OF HOME. RUNOFF TO BE CONVEYED W/ APPROXIMATELY 215 LF OF DRAINTILE @ 1.85% TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION START IE= 952.0 APPROX END IE=948.0 APPROX GUTTERS TO BE INSTALLED TO COLLECT HOME IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF AND SHALL DRAIN TO FRONT SIDE OF HOME. RUNOFF TO BE CONVEYED W/ APPROXIMATELY 305 LF OF DRAINTILE @ 0.50% TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION START IE= 947.5 APPROX END IE=946.0 APPROX GUTTERS TO BE INSTALLED TO COLLECT HOME IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF AND SHALL DRAIN TO FRONT SIDE OF HOME. RUNOFF TO BE CONVEYED W/ APPROXIMATELY 835 LF OF DRAINTILE @ 3.7% TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION START IE= 979.0 APPROX END IE=948.0 APPROX LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 E O F 9 4 8 . 8 6 100' Principal Structure Setback from Long Lake Creek 20' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP GFE=958.0 FFE=959.0 LFE=950.0 GFE=955.0 FFE=956.0 LFE=947.0 GFE=949.5 FFE=951.5 LFE=942.5 GFE=956.0 FFE=957.0 LFE=948.0 946 950 948 950 950 952 95 2 948 946 946 BOTHWLOUT 958 956 95 4 952 950 946 944 948 9 5 0 ORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L 948.14 948.86 95 0 9 5 2 946 948 954952 950 9 5 4 . 1 951.2 952.5 949.0 948.5 948.5 949 . 5 9 5 1 . 3 9 5 3 . 1 952.73 HP 42 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.95% FES 100 IE=941.2 OCS 101 SEE DETAIL SHEET C9.01 APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 5.3% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 2.0% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 2.0% 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = 8.0% 10% MAX. APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY GRADE BUILD = VARIES 10% MAX. DRIVEWAY TO BE BUILT WITH HOME CONSTRUCTION 8" DRAINTILE TYP. SEE BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL SHEET C9.01 T W:947.1 BW:944.0 T W:947.1 BW:946.5 T W:946.8 BW:946.0 T W:947.0 BW:944.0 T W:955.0 BW:954.5 T W:954.9 BW:952.1 T W:953.8 BW:952.3 T W:953.1 BW:953.6 CLEANOUT (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET C9.01 SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C4-GRADE.dwg C4.02 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update 902.5 X 902 SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE STORM SEWER SOIL BORINGS DRAINTILE EOF 902.5 D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update Jun 09, 2021 - 2:38pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C4-GRADE.dwg C4.03 GRADING NOTES 1.PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER GRADE. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB. 3.ALL GRADIENT ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08% (1:48). MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE IN 2.08% (1:48). CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 5.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY: COMPANY: BRAUN INTERTEC ADDRESS: 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE S, MPLS, MN 55438 PHONE: 952-995-2000 DATED: JANUARY 16, 2020 CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE DEWATERING AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION. 8.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 9.REPLACE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BECOME UNSUITABLE AND WILL NOT PASS A TEST ROLL. REMOVE UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM THE SITE AND IMPORT SUITABLE SOIL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 11.EXISTING TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS AND SHALL BE A RESTRICTED AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN AT ALL TIMES. EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT NEEDLESSLY BE OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND EXTREME CAUTION SHALL BE EXERCISED WHEN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION. SHOULD CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TO THE TREE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. 11.a.RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE ALL DESIGNATED TREED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ZONE. ALL VEGETATION WITHIN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL REMAIN. 11.b.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION MAY BE RESTRICTED TO A NARROWER WIDTH IN THE FIELD TO SAVE ADDITIONAL TREES AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 11.c.ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES WOULD INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: SOIL AND OTHER MATERIAL STOCKPILING, EQUIPMENT OR MACHINERY STORAGE, DRIVING OF ANY VEHICLE, LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE OF ANY “WASHOUT” OR OTHER TOXIC MATERIAL. THE COLLECTION OF OTHER DEBRIS AND SOIL STOCKPILING WILL BE IN AN AREA DETERMINED ON-SITE BY THE ENGINEER. 11.d.ALL RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL BE FENCED OFF WITH BRIGHT ORANGE POLYETHYLENE SAFETY NETTING AND STEEL STAKES AS SHOWN ON THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL. AT NO TIME SHALL THIS FENCING BE REMOVED OR ACTIVITY OF ANY KIND TAKE PLACE WITHIN IT. FINAL PLACEMENT OF ALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE COMPLETE BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES ON-SITE. 11.e.BEFORE COMMENCING WITH ANY EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL PREPARATORY WORK REGARDING TREE REMOVAL, ROOT PRUNING, TREE PRUNING AND STUMP REMOVAL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 11.f.PREPARATORY WORK SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AND SHALL BE COMPLETED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 11.f.a.TREE REMOVAL: CONTRACTOR SHALL FELL THE TREES. AT NO TIME SHALL TREES BE BULLDOZED OUT, BUT SHALL BE CUT DOWN AND STUMPS REMOVED SEPARATELY. PRIOR TO THE FELLING OF ALL TREES, PROPER REMOVAL OF A PORTION OR ALL OF THE CANOPY SHALL BE COMPLETED SO THAT TREES IN THE RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL NOT BE INJURED IN THE PROCESS. 11.f.b.ROOT PRUNING: BEFORE ANY STUMPS ARE TO BE REMOVED, ALL ROOTS SHALL BE SEVERED FROM ROOTS IN THE RESTRICTED AREAS BY SAW CUTTING WITH A VERMEER DESIGNED FOR ROOT PRUNING, BY HAND, OR WITH A CHAINSAW. TREE ROOTS PROJECTING INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE SHALL BE EXPOSED PRIOR TO ROOT PRUNING WITH SMALL MACHINERY, I.E..., BOBCAT. 11.f.c.STUMP REMOVAL: AT SUCH TIME THAT ROOTS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY SEVERED, STUMPS MAY BE REMOVED. WHERE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN STUMPS COULD CAUSE DAMAGE TO EXISTING PROTECTED TREES, TREE STUMPS SHALL BE GROUND OUT. ALL STUMP REMOVAL SHALL BE UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 11.f.d.TREE PRUNING: PROPER PRUNING OF TREES IN THE RESTRICTED ZONE SHALL BE DIRECTED BY AND SUPERVISION AT ALL TIMES BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 11.g.AN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE PREPARATORY AND CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 11.h.MULCH RATHER THAN SEED OR SOD WILL BE USED AT THE BASE OF QUALITY TREES TO A PERIMETER DETERMINED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. AREAS TO BE SEEDED FOR EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NATURAL GROUND COVER WILL BE MAINTAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 11.i.THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS NEAR TREES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE REQUIRED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD, BASED ON TREE LOCATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY. 12.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 13.TRENCH BORROW CONSTRUCTION: IF ALLOWED BY THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE “TRENCH BORROW” EXCAVATION IN AREAS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN ORDER TO OBTAIN STRUCTURAL MATERIAL. TREES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED OR DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE EXCAVATION, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE EXCAVATION SHALL COMMENCE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE LIMIT OF THE BUILDING PAD. THE EXCAVATION FROM THIS LIMIT SHALL EXTEND AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1 FOOT HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL (1:1) DOWNWARD AND OUTWARD FROM THE FINISHED SURFACE GRADE ELEVATION. THE TRENCH BORROW EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION, AND SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 2105.3F2. SNOW FENCE SHALL BE FURNISHED AND PLACED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE TRENCH BORROW AREA WHERE THE SLOPES EXCEED 2 FOOT HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL (2:1). 14.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED, CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED, ERODED OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 15.TOLERANCES 15.a.THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.b.THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.10 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.c.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.d.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 15.e.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 16.AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETED, IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ANY HAUL ROADS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL INDICATE HAUL ROADS ON EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL “SITE MAP”. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF EACH ROADWAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL POST WHATEVER SECURITY, AND COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED BY EACH GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF EACH ROADWAY. 18.DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN WETLAND MITIGATION SITE AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE WETLAND SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 TO 12 INCHES OF ORGANIC SOILS, PREFERABLY SOILS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED FROM WETLAND AREAS. SEEDING IN THE WETLAND MITIGATION AREAS ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL SHALL BE MN STATE SEED MIX 34-271, WET MEADOW SOUTH AND WEST, OR APPROVED EQUAL. FOR STATE SEED MIXES, OATS AND WINTER WHEAT SHOULD BE SELECTED BASED ON THE TIME OF YEAR THAT THE MIX IS BEING USED. OATS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN MIXES IF BEING USED BETWEEN OCTOBER 15TH AND AUGUST 1ST. WINTER WHEAT SHOULD BE USED BETWEEN AUGUST 1ST AND OCTOBER 15TH. THE SEEDING RATE IS THE SAME FOR OATS AND WINTER WHEAT. MIX 34-271 SHOULD BE APPLIED AT 12 POUNDS PER ACRE. SEED SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS OBTAINED. 19.FILL PLACED WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH HUD/FHA PROCEDURES AND DATA SHEET 79G. GRADING NOTES 1.FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: (INCLUDES ALL DEVICES USING FILTRATION THROUGH A SOIL MEDIUM TO CAPTURE STORM WATER RUNOFF BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: INFILTRATION BASINS, INFILTRATION TRENCHES, BIOFILTRATION BASINS, RAINWATER GARDENS, SAND FILTERS, ORGANIC FILTERS, BIORETENTION AREAS, ENHANCED SWALES, DRY STORAGE PONDS WITH UNDERDRAIN DISCHARGE, AND NATURAL DEPRESSIONS (IF USED TO PROVIDE STORMWATER TREATMENT OF NEW IMPERIOUS SURFACE)) 1.a.PERMITTEES MUST NOT EXCAVATE INFILTRATION SYSTEMS TO FINAL GRADE, OR WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED UNLESS THEY PROVIDE RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. WHEN EXCAVATING AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, PERMITTEES MUST STAKE OFF AND MARK THE AREA SO HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT DO NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE INFILTRATION AREA. ONCE STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION CEASES AND “FINAL STABILIZATION” (AS DEFINED ACCORDING TO SECTION 8 OF THE SWPPP NARRATIVE) OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED, AND ONLY AFTER THE OWNER'S ENGINEER AUTHORIZES CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED, INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO FINISHED GRADE. 1.b.HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT TRAVEL WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN AREA. EXCAVATION WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE PERFORMED BY USE OF A BACKHOE BUCKET WITH TEETH. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISC OR TILL THE SOILS IF REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 1.c.INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SILT FENCE DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ALL DEPOSITED SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF DOWNSTREAM OF INFILTRATION BASIN, IF POSSIBLE. 1.d.ALL FLARED END SECTION INLETS AND CATCH BASIN MANHOLE INLETS SHALL HAVE INLET EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION BASIN HAS OCCURRED. 1.e.ABOVE THE INFILTRATION BASIN OUTLET ELEVATION, INCLUDING THE BERM AND DISTURBED AREAS, A MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION. TOPSOIL SHALL MEET (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION. THE AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MN STATE SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (LOW MAINTENANCE TURF) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 220 LBS/ACRE, OR MN STATE SEED MIXTURE 35-241 (MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 36.5 LBS/ACRE. SOD MEETING (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3878.2-B CAN BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SEED. SEED APPLICATION PROCEDURE: MIXTURE APPLICATION PROCEDURES SHALL FOLLOW (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 2575.3. SEED SHALL BE SECURED BY USE OF (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3885 CATEGORY 1 EROSION BLANKET. ABSENT A SOIL TEST, FERTILIZER MEETING ANALYSIS 22-5-10 (NPK) 80% W.I.N. SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 350 LBS/ACRE FOR SEED MIXTURE 25-131, OR FERTILIZER WITH AN ANALYSIS OF 18-1-8 (NPK) (FOR LOAMS, CLAY LOAM SOIL), OR 17-10-7 (NPK) (FOR SANDS WITH LESS THAN 30% ORGANIC AND CLAY MATTER) NATURAL BASE SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE FOR SEED MIXTURE 35-241. 1.f.BELOW THE INFILTRATION BASIN OUTLET, INCLUDING BASIN FLOOR, PLACE PLANTING MEDIUM SOIL BASED ON - SITE SOIL CONDITIONS, AND ALSO BASED ON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, WATERSHED, AND/OR CITY RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE DETAIL ON PLAN). DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITH MN STATE SEED MIXTURE 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) APPLIED AT A RATE OF 35 LBS/ACRE. DRAINTILE INSTALLATION (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE INSTALLED CONCURRENTLY WITH FLOOR CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: INFILTRATION BASIN FLOOR EXCAVATING, PLANTING MEDIUM SOIL PLACEMENT, DRAINTILE INSTALLATION, ETC. SHALL TAKE PLACE ONLY AFTER THE OWNER'S ENGINEER AUTHORIZES CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED AND AFTER INFILTRATION BASIN SIDESLOPES (ABOVE OUTLET ELEVATION) HAVE UNDERGONE “FINAL STABILIZATION” WHICH INCLUDES FLUSHING OUT ACCUMULATED SILT AND SEDIMENT FROM CONTRIBUTING STORM SEWER. EXCAVATED BASIN MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF DOWNSTREAM OF BASIN AREA, IF POSSIBLE, OR OFF-SITE. SEED APPLICATION PROCEDURE: MIXTURE APPLICATION PROCEDURES SHALL FOLLOW (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 2575.3. SEED SHALL BE SECURED BY USE OF HYDRO MULCH, OR SECURED BY (MN/DOT) SPECIFICATION 3885 CATEGORY 1 OR CATEGORY 3 EROSION BLANKET. ABSENT A SOIL TEST, FERTILIZER WITH AN ANALYSIS OF 18-1-8 (NPK) (FOR LOAMS, CLAY LOAM SOIL), OR 17-10-7 (NPK) (FOR SANDS WITH LESS THAN 30% ORGANIC AND CLAY MATTER), NATURAL BASE SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 120 LBS/ACRE. 1.g.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEED OR REPLANT ANY AREAS ON WHICH THE ORIGINAL SEED HAS FAILED TO GERMINATE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. 1.h.IF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION ARE PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR, THOSE ALTERNATIVE METHODS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. 1.i.COSTS FOR REMOBILIZATION (IF REQUIRED) TO COMPLETE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2.PERFORMANCE TESTING OF INFILTRATION BASINS: (TO BE CONDUCTED IF DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE WAS VERIFIED ACCORDING TO ASTM D-3385-03 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR INFILTRATION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER".) ALL COSTS RELATED TO THE PERFORMANCE INFILTRATION TESTING SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNER, EXCEPT AS NOTED. THE INFILTRATION BASINS WILL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE: 2.a.A MINIMUM OF TWO INFILTRATION TESTS SHALL BE COMPLETED FOR EACH INFILTRATION BASIN (0.5 ACRE FLOOR AREA OR LESS). THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TESTS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER AND THE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. 2.b.TWO ADDITIONAL TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH 0.5 ACRE OF INFILTRATION BASIN FLOOR AREA. 2.c.TEST PROCEDURE WILL FOLLOW ASTM D-3385-09 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR INFILTRATION RATE OF SOILS IN FIELD USING DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER". 2.d.TEST WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE FINISHED BASIN FLOOR ELEVATION. 2.e.TEST WILL BE FOR A PERIOD AS OUTLINED IN ASTM D-3385-09. 2.f.THE TEST RESULTS WILL BE AVERAGED TO OBTAIN THE INFILTRATION RATE USED FOR ACCEPTANCE. 2.g.THE LOWEST MEASURED INFILTRATION RATE SHALL EXCEED THE DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.2 INCHES/HOUR. 2.h.THE AVERAGE OF THE MEASURED INFILTRATION RATES MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN RATE OF 0.2 INCHES/HOUR DIVIDED BY THE CORRECTION FACTOR USED IN CALCULATING THE DESIGN RATE AS NOTED IN TABLE 12.INF.8 FROM THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL. IF THE INFILTRATION RATE AS TESTED DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIRED RATE AS DETERMINED ABOVE, CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE SOIL CORRECTIVE AND/OR SOIL REPLACEMENT WORK AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN AREA AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE UNTIL THE INFILTRATION RATE AS TESTED EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED RATE AS DETERMINED ABOVE. SUBSEQUENT RE-TESTING WILL BE REQUIRED UNTIL THE INFILTRATION AS TESTED EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED RATE AS DETERMINED ABOVE. RE-TESTING SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE AMOUNT DUE THE CONTRACTOR. FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP LONG LAKE CREEK IMPAIRED WATERBODY WITHIN 1 MILE AND RECEIVES SITE RUNOFF CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT NO CONTAMINATED RUNOFF FLOWS TO THE CREEK LONG LAKE IS AN IMPAIRED WATERBODY TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT AND WITHIN 1 MILE NO RUNOFF DRAINS TO IT TANAGER LAKE IS AN IMPAIRED WATERBODY TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROJECT, OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS BUT WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE SITE AND RECEIVES DISCHARGE PERMITTEES MUST NOT EXCAVATE FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO FINAL GRADE, OR WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED UNLESS THEY PROVIDE RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.5 WHEN EXCAVATING A FILTRATION SYSTEM TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, PERMITTEES MUST STAKE OFF AND MARK THE AREA SO HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT DO NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE FILTRATION AREA. IP1 PROPOSED CONCRETE WASHOUT LOCATION IF NEEDED, SEE DETAIL SHEET C5.03 PROPOSED TOPSOIL STOCKPILE LOCATION IF NEEDED, SILT FENCE TO REMAIN AROUND STOCKPILE AT ALL TIMES SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS.dwg C5.01 PHASE I EROSION CONTROL PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP CHECK DAM SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. TSM TS SB EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 2,170 INLET PROTECTION (IP-1)EACH 1 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 SILT DIKE BIO-ROLL LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EOF 902.5 D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 902 * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS IPX LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE X3 14.16 AC X2 22.58 AC X1 2.61 AC 1.PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY OTHER WORK. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP 946 950948 950 950 952 95 2 948 946 946 BOTHWLOUT 958 956 95 4 952 950 946944 948 9 5 0 ORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L 95 0 9 5 2 946 948 954952 950 LONG LAKE CREEK IMPAIRED WATERBODY WITHIN 1 MILE AND RECEIVES SITE RUNOFF CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT NO CONTAMINATED RUNOFF FLOWS TO THE CREEK LONG LAKE IS AN IMPAIRED WATERBODY TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE, OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT AND WITHIN 1 MILE NO RUNOFF DRAINS TO IT TANAGER LAKE IS AN IMPAIRED WATERBODY TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROJECT, OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS BUT WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE SITE AND RECEIVES DISCHARGE PERMITTEES MUST NOT EXCAVATE FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO FINAL GRADE, OR WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED UNLESS THEY PROVIDE RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.5 WHEN EXCAVATING A FILTRATION SYSTEM TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, PERMITTEES MUST STAKE OFF AND MARK THE AREA SO HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT DO NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE FILTRATION AREA. IP1 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS.dwg C5.02 PHASE II EROSION CONTROL PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP CHECK DAM SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. TSM TS SB EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 2,170 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQUARE FEET 1,458 EROSION PROTECTION BLANKET SQUARE FEET 1,200 BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET 18 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION (IP-1)EACH 1 SILT DIKE BIO-ROLL LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EOF 902.5 D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 902 * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS IPX EROSION CONTROL BLANKET EROSION PROTECTION BLANKET LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE S3 12.97 AC S2 20.42 AC S1 5.96 AC LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP 946 950948 950 950 952 95 2 948 946 946 BOTHWLOUT 958 956 95 4 952 950 946944 948 9 5 0 ORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L 95 0 9 5 2 946 948 954952 950 STABILIZE WITH BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) STABILIZE WITH BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) STABILIZED GRAVEL SHOULDER (TYP.) HOME CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROVIDE PERMANENT STABILIZATION/RESTORATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ORONO REQUIREMENTS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT (TYP.) SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS-STABILIZATION PLAN.dwg C5.02 PHASE II EROSION CONTROL PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE LEGEND EOF 902.5 D THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 902 STABILZE R-O-W WITH TURF SOD (HIGHLAND SOD) STABILIZE BASIN BOTTOM WITH MNDOT 33-261 (WET AREA) S3 S2 STABILIZE BASIN SLOPES WITH MNDOT 35-241 (GENERAL MESIC PRAIRIE MIX) STABILIZE MISC WITH MNDOT 25-121 (GENERAL ROADSIDE) Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS.dwg C5.03 EROSION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1.ALL SILT FENCES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 2.TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. DRAINAGE AND REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS (SEE PART 10.1-10.5 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT). 3.SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF SEDIMENT BEING DEPOSITED BY EROSION. CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. THE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK. 4.CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL OFF-SITE PAVED SURFACES, WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO COMPLY WITH PART 9.11-9.12 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS, AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SITE. THE PERMITTEE(S) ARE RESPONSIBLE UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS ASSUMED CONTROL (ACCORDING TO PART 3.1 TO 3.8 OF THE MPCA GENERAL PERMIT) OVER ALL AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY STABILIZED OR THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, AND A (N.O.T.) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. 6.IF SEDIMENT ESCAPES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OFF-SITE ACCUMULATIONS OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACTS (E.G., FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS). 7.ALL INFILTRATION AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS REACHING THE INFILTRATION AREA AND THESE AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DRIVING ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREA. 1.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. WHERE A CONFLICT EXISTS BETWEEN LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND SAMBATEK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, THE MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATION SHALL APPLY. 2.THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS COMPRISED OF THIS DRAWING (EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN-ESC PLAN), THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, AND ITS APPENDICES, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING & SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT, ISSUED AUGUST 1, 2018) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS. THE SWPPP AND ALL OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AS REQUIRED BY THE SWPPP & PERMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE THE INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE OF THE BMP'S AND EROSION PREVENTION FROM BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, IS APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES, AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA BY EITHER THE OWNER OR OPERATOR AS APPROVED ON PERMIT. ADDITIONAL BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH TRAINING REQUIREMENTS IN PART 21.1-21.3 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 6.BMP'S AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 7.ESC PLAN MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THE ESC PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES MUST NOT OCCUR OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. 9.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 10.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE AND SHALL BE CONTAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 11.ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK-PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. SELF-CONTAINED CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON CONCRETE DELIVERY TRUCKS ARE ALLOWED. 12.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 13.DUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 14.SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT & CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS & OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY & MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 15.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT & ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE & DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. 16.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE SWPPP, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AND PRIOR TO SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES UPSLOPE. 17.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED, WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INACTIVITY. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE NUMBER 21-111 OR 21-112 DEPENDING ON THE SEASON OF PLANTING ( SEE MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3) SEEDING METHOD AND APPLICATION RATE SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3. TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3F1 AND 2575.3G. ALTERNATIVELY, HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3H MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF TEMPORARY MULCH. 18.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TIME TABLE DESCRIBED ABOVE. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE COVER. 19.CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES & FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING WASHED BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES, OR DRAINAGEWAYS DISCHARGING OFF-SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS. THE CLEANOUT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 20.ON-SITE & OFF-SITE SOIL STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BMP'S. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 21.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS & CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & GUTTER SYSTEMS OR CONDUITS & DITCHES. 22.SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. 23.DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, CHECK DAMS, INLET PROTECTION DEVICES, ETC.) TO PREVENT EROSION. 24.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACKFILLING OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION. DEVELOPER/OWNER: GORDON-JAMES SITE OPERATOR / GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUPERINTENDENT: CROSS BRACE MI N . 15 " 18 " MA X . 2" X 4" STAKE 3' M I N . DROP INLET WITH GRATE 2" X 4" WOOD (TYP.) 5' MIN. SECURELY FASTEN OVERLAPPING ENDS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL TO ADJACENT STAKES WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO EACH POST WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS (SEE NOTE 1) 1. ATTACH THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO EACH POST AND THE GEOTEXTILE TO THE WOVEN WIRE FENCE (SPACED EVERY 30") WITH THREE WIRE TIES OR OTHER FASTENERS, ALL SPACED WITHIN THE TOP 8" OF THE FABRIC. ATTACH EACH TIE DIAGONALLY 45 DEGREES THROUGH THE FABRIC, WITH EACH PUNCTURE AT LEAST 1" VERTICALLY APART. 2. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF SILT FENCE MATERIAL ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED ACROSS TWO POSTS. 3. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NOTED IN THE SWPPP. DEPTH OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS MAY NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC. MAINTENANCE CLEANOUT MUST BE CONDUCTED REGULARLY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS FROM REACHING ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE MATERIAL ABOVE GRADE. 4. ALL SILT FENCE INLETS SHALL INCLUDE WIRE SUPPORT. OVERLAP 5' MIN. SILT FENCE MATERIAL TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH THREE TIES SPACED AT 30" ON CENTER (SEE NOTE 1) DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX OVERFLOW 1 - CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY 10" FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB CG 3067 HIGH-FLOW FABRIC MIRAFI FF101 ROAD DRAIN CASTING APPLICABILTY ·NEENAH R-3067 ·NEENAH R-3512 NOT TO SCALE 8' X 8' MIN OR AS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN WASTE CONCRETE SIGN TO INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 2'-0" MIN BERM AROUND PERIMETER GROUND SURFACE 12" MIN 12" MIN COMPACTED EMBANKMENT MATERIAL (TYP.)3:1 OR FLATTER SIDE SLOPES NOTES: 1.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY CONCRETE PLACEMENT ON SITE. 2.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE LINED WITH MINIMUM 10 MIL THICK PLASTIC LINER. 3.VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL IS REQUIRED IF ACCESS TO CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS OFF PAVEMENT. 4.SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AT THE WASHOUT AREA, AND ELSEWHERE AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA TO OPERATORS OF CONCRETE TRUCKS AND PUMP RIGS. 5.THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE REPAIRED AND ENLARGED OR CLEANED OUT AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CAPACITY FOR WASTED CONCRETE. 6.AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF AT AN ACCEPTED WASTE SITE. 7.WHEN THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IS REMOVED, THE DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED IN A MANNER ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SILT FENCE MATERIAL COVER EXTEND WIRE FENCE A MIN. OF 3" INTO GROUND EXTEND SILT FENCE MATERIAL A MIN. OF 1'-0" INTO GROUND EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS / "SITE MAP" SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE USGS MAP GENERAL EROSION NOTES: NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION (IP-2)SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION (IP-1) NOT TO SCALE POSTS: 2 X 4 WOODEN STAKE FENCE: WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 GA., 6" MAX. MESH OPENING FABRIC: IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6461 LATEST EDITION. NOT TO SCALE PHASE I: 1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3.CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ON EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 5.CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS, AS REQUIRED. 6. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPs. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 7. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 8. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 9. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. PHASE II: 1.TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3.INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. 4.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6.PAVE SITE. 7.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. 9.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT AREA SUMMARY IN ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 0.59 AC± BUILDING AREA 1.84 AC± SEEDED AREA 0.04 AC± TOTAL DISTURBED 2.46 AC± PRE - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 0.77 AC± POST - CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 2.42 AC± SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONFRAME MAINTENANCE NOTES: FOR USE ONLY IN PAVED AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT LOADS ARE EXPECTED TO BE VERY LOW. FILTER SACK MUST HAVE OVERFLOW HOLES TO PREVENT PONDING. N.T.S. INLET PROTECTION FILTER SACK (IP-3) PUB L I C R O A D HAR D S U R F A C E MI N 0 . 5 % G R A D E 20' M I N I M U M 50' M I N I M U M MINIMUM 0.5% GRADE DOWN FROM PUBLIC STREET GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINER 4"- 6" DIAMETER CLEAN STONE 10" MINIMUM N.T.S. TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION EXIT GEOTEXTILE BAG OVERFLOW HOLES LOOPS SIZED FOR 1" REBAR. USE REBAR FOR A HANDLE TO EMPTY FILTER SACK AT A SEDIMENT COLLECTION LOCATION. LOOPS SIZED FOR RECTANGULAR BAR 2"X1/4". LIFT FILTER BAG FROM INLET USING RECTANGULAR BAR FOR HANDLES. 2"X2"X3/4" RUBBER BLOCK (TYP) (FILTER SACK INSTALLED) FRAME TO HOLD FILTER BAG IN PLACE 1/4" BRIGHTLY COLORED NYLON ROPE EXPANSION RESTRAINT ISOMETRIC VIEW SECTION VIEW SECURE RECTANGULAR BAR TO OR UNDER SURROUNDING SURFACE. 1/4" BRIGHTLY COLORED NYLON ROPE EXPANSION RESTRAINT FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1.GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE A WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS REQUIREMENTS IN THE SPECIFICATIONS TABLE. 2.PLACE AN OIL ABSORBENT PAD OR PILLOW OVER INLET GRATE WHEN OIL SPILLS ARE A CONCERN. 3.THE WIDTH, "W", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL MATCH THE INSIDE WIDTH OF THE GRATED INLET BOX. 4.THE DEPTH, "D", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL BE BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND 36 INCHES. 5.THE LENGTH, "L", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL MATCH THE INSIDE LENGTH OF THE GRATED INLET BOX. D H MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE INSPECTED FOR SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION WITHIN THE CATCH BASIN. REMOVE TRAPPED SEDIMENT WHEN BRIGHTLY COLORED EXPANSION RESTRAINT CAN NO LONGER BE SEEN. 2.REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED IN OR ADJACENT TO A STORM DRAIN INLET MUST BEGIN IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY, WITH COMPLETION OF THE ACTIVITY OCCURRING NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. 3.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR UNINTENDED BYPASS OR IMPROPER FLOW-RATES THAT MAY CAUSE DOWNSTREAM FLOODING. 4.CONTACT THE CEC FOR ALTERNATE INLET PROTECTION IF THE DESIGNED PROTECTION MAY IMPACT DOWNSTREAM BMPS, ADJACENT SLOPES, ETC., DUE TO PONDING ISSUES. ENSURE THAT NO UNDERMINING OF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES HAS OCCURRED. 5.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. INLET GRATE SITE 12 LUCE L I N E S T A T E T R A I L O R O N O O R C H A R D R D SITE Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS.dwg C5.04 SWPPP NARRATIVE Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update SECTION 1: SITE EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, AND PLANNING 1.1 PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION ORCHARD CREEK ORONO ORCHARD ROAD N CITY: ORONO STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55356 COUNTY: HENNEPIN THIS SWPPP ADDRESSES THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE ORCHARD HILL PROHECT WITH IS PART OF AN OVERALL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OF 39.4 ACRES. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTS OF CREATING 5 LOTS WITH CUSTOM BUILT HOMES AND A PRIVATE ROADWAY WITH A CUL-DE-SAC TO SERVE THOSE 5 LOTS. NPDES PERMIT NUMBER: TBD 1.2 CONTACT INFORMATION/RESPONSIBLE PARTIES COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: GORDON JAMES CONTACT NAME: JOE MCPHERSON ADDRESS: 5159 MAIN ST E #200 CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: MAPLE PLAIN, MN, 55359 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 763-479-3117 FAX/EMAIL: JOE@GORDON-JAMES.COM GENERAL CONTRACTOR (TO BE COMPLETED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: INSERT AREA OF CONTROL (IF MORE THAN ONE OPERATOR AT SITE): THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRAM (GENERAL PERMIT). THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY (LGU) HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE A CO-APPLICANT WITH THE OWNER. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. THE “APPLICATION FOR GENERAL STORM-WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (MN R100001)” SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBMITTED ONLINE, ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE, THROUGH THE MPCA'S WEBSITE. UNLESS NOTIFIED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) TO THE CONTRARY, APPLICANTS WHO SUBMIT A COMPLETE APPLICATION FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT ARE AUTHORIZED TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS THE ONLINE APPLICATION PROCESS IS COMPLETE(HTTPS://NETWEB.PCA.STATE.MN.US/PRIVATE/). (NOTE: ALL PROJECTS UNDER 50 ACRES MUST SUBMIT THE PERMIT APPLICATION USING THE ONLINE PROCESS. MAILED APPLICATIONS ARE ONLY ACCEPTED FOR PROJECTS THAT DISTURB 50 OR MORE ACRES, AND HAVE A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN 1 MILE OF A PROTECTED WATER.) ADDITIONALLY, AUTHORIZATION WILL BE DELAYED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: ·IF THE PROJECT DISTURBS 50 ACRES OR MORE AND HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN 1 MILE AND FLOWS TO AN IMPAIRED OR SPECIAL WATER WHOSE DISCHARGE MAY REACH AN IMPAIRED OR SPECIAL WATER LISTED IN SECTION 23 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND A COMPLETED APPLICATION AT LEAST 30 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UNLESS NOTIFIED BY THE MPCA TO THE CONTRARY, COVERAGE BECOMES EFFECTIVE 30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE POSTMARKED DATE OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION. ·IF THE PROJECT INCLUDES ALTERNATIVE METHODS THE APPLICATION AND TWO ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED A MINIMUM OF 90 DAY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SUBCONTRACTOR (RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING & UPDATING SWPPP - TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: TBD CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR (SEE PART 6.1 OF THIS SWPPP FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES- TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: SAMBATEK, INC. CONTACT NAME: JOSH BALZER ADDRESS: 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: MINNETONKA, MN 55344 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 763-476-6010 FAX/EMAIL: JBALZER@SAMBATEK.COM GROUND DISTURBING SUBCONTRACTOR(S): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: TBD CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH ALL OPERATORS ON THE SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE SWPPP WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AND STAY IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS COMPLETE AND THE NOT SUBMITTED. THIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY: COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: SAMBATEK, INC CONTACT NAME: JOSH BALZER ADDRESS: 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE SUITE 300 CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 763-476-6010 FAX/EMAIL: JBALZER@SAMBATEK.COM SWPPP DESIGNER CERTIFICATION CARD: 1.3 NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION: THIS SWPPP HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR MAJOR ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF 5 CUSTOM HOMES, PRIVATE DRIVE, AND STORMWATER BMP'S TOI SERVICE THE COMMUNITY WITHIN THE ORCHARD HILLS DEVELOPMENT IN ORONO, MN. ANTICIPATED APPROXIMATE TIMELINES: ESTIMATED PROJECT START DATE: 05/30/21 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:05/30/23 1.4 SOILS, SLOPES, VEGETATION, AND CURRENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS SOIL TYPE(S): THE NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY INDICATES THAT SOILS ON SITE VARY. THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE CONSISTS OF HSG B/D SOILS AND HSG C SOILS. THESE SOILS HAVE LOW INFILTRATION RATES. IT IS ASSUMED AT THIS TIME THAT INFILTRATION WILL BE FEASIBLE ON SITE. SLOPES: EXISTING SITE HAS LARGE AREAS OF VERY STEEP SLOPES, THESE AREAS WILL BE PRESERVED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. MINOR GRADING ACTIVITIES WILL TAKE PLACE ON SITE TO BUILD THE HOMES. DRAINAGE PATTERNS: THE EXISTING SITE GENERALLY DRAINS OVERLAND OUTWARD FROM THE CENTER OF THE SITE. A PORTION OF THE RUNOFF IS DIRECTED INTO THE SW WETLAND , SE WETLAND AND INTO LONG LAKE CREEK. EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL BE MAINTAINED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT. VEGETATION: THE EXISTING SITE IS MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED LAND WITH GRASS COVER, WETLANDS, AND HEAVY WOODS. RAINFALL INFORMATION: RAINFALL INFORMATION - THE AVERAGE TOTAL ANNUAL PRECIPITATION IS ABOUT 28.32 INCHES. OF THIS ABOUT 17.31 INCHES, OR 61 PERCENT, USUALLY FALLS IN MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER. THE AVERAGE ANNUAL SNOWFALL IS 57.3 INCHES. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION SITE ESTIMATES PROJECT AREA SUMMARY: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 39.4 ACRES CONSTRUCTION SITE AREA TO BE DISTURBED: 2.46 ACRES IMPERVIOUS AREAS: IMPERVIOUS AREA BEFORE CONSTRUCTION (ACRES): 0.77 IMPERVIOUS AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION (ACRES): 0.59 AC FOR ROADWAY AND A MAX OF 1.84 AC FOR HOMES/DRIVEWAYS. TOTAL OF 2.42 AC 1.6 RECEIVING WATERS DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATERS: A PORTION OF THE SITE DRAINS TO TWO EXISTING WETLANDS AND LONG LAKE CREEK. LONG LAKE CREEK IS CONSIDERED AN IMPAIRED STREAM AND DRAINS INTO TANAGER LAKE WHICH IS ALSO AN IMPAIRED WATER. THE STREAM IMPAIRMENT IS DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND THE LAKE IMPAIRMENT IS NUTRIENTS. THESE IMPAIRMENT (S) ARE CONSIDERED TO BE CONSTRUCTION RELATED PARAMETERS AND REQUIRE THE ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 1.7 SITE FEATURES AND SENSITIVE AREAS TO BE PROTECTED CONTRACTOR SHOULD TAKE TAKE CARE TO PROTECT THE EXISTING WETLAND, WETLAND BUFFERS, SIGNIFICANT TREES, AND LONG LAKE CREEK AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCT THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S TO KEEP SEDIMENT OUT OF THE WETLAND. 1.8 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POLLUTION POTENTIAL SOURCES OF SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS TO STORMWATER RUNOFF: CONSTRUCTION PHASE POLLUTANT SOURCES ANTICIPATED AT THE SITE ARE DISTURBED (BARE) SOIL, VEHICLE FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, CHEMICALS ASSOCIATED WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND BUILDING MATERIALS. WITHOUT ADEQUATE CONTROL THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR EACH TYPE OF POLLUTANT TO BE TRANSPORTED BY STORM WATER. 1.9 ENDANGERED/THREATENED SPECIES THERE ARE NO KNOWN THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES ARE PRESENT ON SITE. 1.10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION THERE ARE NO KNOWN HISTORIC SITES ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 1.11 APPLICABLE FEDERAL, TRIBAL, STATE OR LOCAL PROGRAMS LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT (LGU) REQUIREMENTS: THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) IS THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT (LGU) AND HAS PERMITTING AUTHORITY OF THE SITE. THE WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS FOR REDEVELOPMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS: RATE CONTROL FOR THE 1, 10, AND 100 YEAR RAINFALL EVENTS, INFILTRATION OF THE FIRST 1.0 INCH OF RUNOFF FROM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EQUIVALENT INFILTRATION REQUIREMENT. 1.13 MAPS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS: THE FOLLOWING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS SWPPP: C-5.01- PHASE I EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN C-5.02 - PHASE II EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN C-5.03 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS & NOTES C-5.04 - SWPPP NARRATIVE C-5.05 - SWPPP NARRATIVE SECTION 2: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS EROSION CONTROL BMPS: THE PURPOSE OF EROSION CONTROL IS TO PREVENT SOIL PARTICLES FROM BECOMING SUSPENDED IN WATER AND BEING TRANSPORTED TO EITHER DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATERS OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION MUST BE PLANNED FOR AND IMPLEMENTED. IN THE NATURAL CONDITION, SOIL IS STABILIZED BY NATIVE VEGETATION. THE PRIMARY TECHNIQUE TO BE USED AT THIS PROJECT FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF SITE SOIL WILL BE TO PROVIDE A PROTECTIVE COVER OF VEGETATION, PAVEMENT, OR BUILDING. ALL EXPOSED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (BUT NO LATER THAN THE NEXT WORK DAY) TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION, BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 14 DAYS. AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G. CLEAN AGGREGATED STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT, BUT MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 2.7 OF THIS SWPPP (SECTION 8.4, 9.9, 9.10, AND 23.9 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT). SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS: THE PURPOSE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO PREVENT SOIL PARTICLES THAT HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED IN WATER FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AS PART OF THIS SWPPP. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING ADDITIONAL UP GRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST ALWAYS BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND BE LOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES MUST REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED (SEE SECTION 8 OF THIS SWPPP). THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE RE-INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT RAIN EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 2.1 MINIMIZE DISTURBED AREA AND PROTECT NATURAL FEATURES AND SOIL THE WETLANDS ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ANY UNNECESSARY DISTURBANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE WETLAND AREA WITH SILT FENCE AS INDICATED BY THE PLANS SHALL ONLY GRADE THE REQUIRED AREAS. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL AVOID THE WETLAND AREAS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON SITE. 2.2 PRESERVE 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER THE CONTRACTOR MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER (OR IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE PROVIDE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS) WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECTS EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF THE VEGETATION THAT ALREADY EXISTS IN THE BUFFER OR PROVIDE VEGETATION IF NONE EXISTS. 2.3 CONTROL STORMWATER FLOWING ONTO AND THROUGH THE PROJECT MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT “CLEAN” RUNOFF FROM OFF SITE IS DIVERTED AROUND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN THAT RE-ROUTING OFF SITE RUNOFF DOES NOT RESULT IN FLOODING OR OTHER ISSUES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. BMP DESCRIPTION: TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO UP GRADIENT GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: THE WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. THIS STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. THE REMAINDER OF THE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED, BUT MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. DITCHES MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY 7 DAYS, AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN DIVERSION DITCHES MUST BE REMOVED AND ANY EXPOSED SOILS STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. IF PRECLUDED, NOTE REASON FOR DELAY ON MAINTENANCE LOG. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.4 STABILIZE SOILS 1.TEMPORARY SEEDING - DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT YET AT FINAL GRADE BUT THAT WILL NOT BE ACTIVELY WORKED FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE MUST BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY WHERE WORK HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED AND MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER WORK IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE NUMBER 21-111 OR 21-112 DEPENDING ON THE SEASON OF PLANTING (SEE MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3) SEEDING METHOD AND APPLICATION RATE SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3. TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3C. ALTERNATIVELY, HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3E MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF TEMPORARY MULCH. 2.PERMANENT STABILIZATION - ALL AREAS AT FINAL GRADE MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMANENT STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY WERE WORK HAS PERMANENTLY CEASED AND MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS PERMANENTLY CEASED. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH MULCH. PERMANENT MULCH SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 3 AT 2 TONS/ACRE AND SHALL BE DISK ANCHORED. HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF MULCH IF APPROVED BY CIVIL ENGINEER. IF HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IS USED, IT SHALL BE MN/DOT TYPE 6. 2.5 PROTECT SLOPES STEEP SLOPE AREAS - THE CONTRACTOR MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT HAVE STEEP SLOPES (3:1 OR STEEPER). FOR THOSE SLOPED AREAS WHICH MUST BE DISTURBED, THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES, SUCH AS DRAINING AND TERRACING. SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 MUST BE PROTECTED BY EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS. BMP DESCRIPTION: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME ALLOWED FOR STABILIZATION AFTER WORK HAS CEASED IN AN AREA, DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION (I.E. 24 HOURS, 7 DAYS, 14 DAYS) MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: TO FUNCTION PROPERLY, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS MUST BE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL BENEATH THE BLANKET. BLANKETS MUST BE SECURED PER THE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL PROVIDED WITH THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS. INSPECT BLANKETS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR SUPPLEMENT NON-FUNCTIONAL BLANKETS WITHIN 3 DAYS OR BY THE NEXT RAIN EVENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.6 PROTECT STORM DRAIN INLETS ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE MEANS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT/ETC.) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THIS SWPPP. BMP DESCRIPTION: SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL INLET PROTECTION IN EXISTING STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO BEGINNING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES UP GRADIENT OF THE INLET. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON NEW STRUCTURES AS SOON AS THE STRUCTURES ARE PUT INTO USE. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT SILT FENCE EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): BMP DESCRIPTION: INLET PROTECTION (INLET INSERT DEVICE) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL INLET PROTECTION IN EXISTING STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO BEGINNING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES UP GRADIENT OF THE INLET. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON NEW STRUCTURES AS SOON AS THE STRUCTURES ARE PUT INTO USE. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT INLET PROTECTION EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE CAPACITY OF THE DEVICE, OR, IF MORE STRINGENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.7 ESTABLISH PERIMETER CONTROLS AND SEDIMENT BARRIERS ALL STRUCTURAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS INTENDED TO RECEIVE AND TREAT CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND ALTERATION CAN BEGIN AND MUST STAY IN OPERATION UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. BMP DESCRIPTION: SILT FENCE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL SILT FENCE AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO COMMENCING UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT SILT FENCE EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): BMP DESCRIPTION: BIOLOGS INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL BIOLOGS AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO COMMENCING UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT BIOLOGS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE BIOLOG. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (C 2.8 RETAIN SEDIMENT ON-SITE ANY OFF-SITE ACCUMULATIONS OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACT (E.G. FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. IF A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN IS UTILIZED IT MUST FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. BMP DESCRIPTION: TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO BEGINNING UPSLOPE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO ONLY THOSE AREAS NECESSARY TO INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN THE VOLUME OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES ½ THE STORAGE VOLUME. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. IF CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW MAINTENANCE TO BE PERFORMED WITHIN 72 HOURS, DOCUMENT THE CAUSE OF DELAY ON THE MAINTENANCE FORM. REFER TO SECTION 3.1 OF THIS SWPPP FOR BASIN DRAINING GUIDELINES. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.9 ESTABLISH VEHICLE TRACKING PADS VEHICLE TRACKING PADS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACK OFF. IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF SEDIMENT TRACKING FROM VEHICLES IN PAVED AREAS, THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED BY STREET SWEEPING OR OTHER METHOD AS SOON AS FEASIBLY POSSIBLE, BUT NO LONGER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY. (SECTION 9.11 AND 9.12 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT). BMP DESCRIPTION: VEHICLE TRACKING PAD INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING PAD AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. INSTALL ADDITIONAL VEHICLE TRACKING PADS AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT VEHICLE TRACKING PADS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. VEHICLE TRACKING PADS MUST BE PERIODICALLY 'REFRESHED' TO ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONALITY. MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE PERFORMED WHEN THE EXIT APPEARS SMOOTH AND COMPACTED OR WHEN THE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD CEASES TO FUNCTION PROPERLY. VEHICLE TRACKING PAD LOCATIONS SHOULD BE INSPECTED FOR SIGNS OF OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF VEHICLE TRACKING PADS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): Jun 09, 2021 - 2:39pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C5-EROS.dwg C5.05 SWPPP NARRATIVE Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update 2.10 CONTROL STORMWATER DISCHARGE POINTS 1.PIPE OR OTHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT OUTLETS MUST BE STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 2.STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. THE REMAINDER OF THE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF CONNECTION. BMP DESCRIPTION: RIPRAP INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL RIPRAP AS SHOWN ON SWPPP PLANS AND/OR GRADING PLANS. INSTALLATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT OUTLETS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT NON-FUNCTIONING RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 3 DAYS OR BY THE NEXT RAIN EVENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. ANY OFF SITE ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACTS. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.11 CHEMICAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS MUST BE APPLIED AFTER CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ARE UTILIZED. CHEMICALS MAY ONLY BE APPLIED WHERE TREATED STORMWATER IS DIRECTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM WHICH ALLOWS FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN WHEN SELECTING CHEMICALS TO THE EXPECTED SOIL TYPES TO BE EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND TO THE EXPECTED TURBIDITY, PH AND FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER FLOWING INTO THE CHEMICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM OR AREA. IF CHEMICALS ARE PART OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEY MUST BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, AND WITH DOSING SPECIFICATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER OF THE APPLICABLE CHEMICALS. SECTION 3: DEWATERING & BASIN DRAINING 3.1 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING ALLOWABLE NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES, AS DEFINED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT, ARE LIMITED TO DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING. DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMPS, SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES, OR INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. IF THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO UTILIZE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE AND CLEAN THE FILTER MEDIA USED IN DEWATERING DEVICES WHEN REQUIRED TO RETAIN ADEQUATE FUNCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A WATER USE (APPROPRIATION) PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DNR FOR DEWATERING ACTIVITIES THAT WILL WITHDRAW MORE THAN 10,000 GALLONS OF WATER PER DAY OR 1 MILLION GALLONS PER YEAR. SECTION 4: GOOD HOUSEKEEPING BMPS 4.1 MATERIAL HANDLING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 1.SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL - NO SOLID MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION MATERIALS, COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, SHALL BE ALLOWED TO BE CARRIED FROM THE SITE WITH STORM WATER. ALL SOLID WASTE, INCLUDING DISPOSABLE MATERIALS INCIDENTAL TO THE MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, MUST BE COLLECTED AND PLACED IN CONTAINERS. THE CONTAINERS WILL BE EMPTIED PERIODICALLY BY A CONTRACT TRASH DISPOSAL SERVICE AND HAULED AWAY FROM THE SITE. DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTES MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. 2.GROUNDWATER PROTECTION - SUBSTANCES THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLUTING SURFACE AND/OR GROUNDWATER MUST BE CONTROLLED BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THEY DO NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. AS AN EXAMPLE, SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IN THIS REGARD, POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE HANDLED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPACT THEY REPRESENT. 3.SANITARY FACILITIES - ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL SANITARY SEPTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS. PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. TEMPORARY SANITARY FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE WHERE REQUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL REGULATIONS. THEY MUST BE UTILIZED BY ALL CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL AND BE SERVICED BY A COMMERCIAL OPERATOR. 4.2 ESTABLISH PROPER STORAGE, HANDLING & DISPOSAL PRACTICES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & TOXIC WASTE (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) MUST BE STORED IN WATERPROOF CONTAINERS WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, AND THEIR LOCATION(S) MUST BE NOTED ON THE SWPPP MAP. EXCEPT DURING APPLICATION, THE CONTENTS MUST BE KEPT IN TRUCKS OR WITHIN STORAGE FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.4 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MCPA REGULATIONS. RUNOFF CONTAINING SUCH MATERIAL MUST BE COLLECTED, REMOVED FROM THE SITE, TREATED, AND DISPOSED AT AN APPROVED SOLID WASTE OR CHEMICAL DISPOSAL FACILITY. BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS AND PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER BY PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS TO PREVENT DISCHARGE, OR PROTECTED BY SIMILAR EFFECTIVE MEANS TO PREVENT CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 4.3 DESIGNATE WASHOUT AREAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AREAS FOR CONCRETE AND OTHER (STUCCO, PAINT, FOR RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY) WASHOUTS, AND NOTE THE LOCATIONS ON THE SITE MAP. ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LAYER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE IMPERMEABLE LAYER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM SITE WORKERS TO UTILIZE PROPER FACILITIES FOR DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASTES. BMP DESCRIPTION: CONCRETE WASHOUT INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: PRIOR TO CONCRETE WORK. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT CONCRETE WASHOUTS FOR EVIDENCE OF DISCHARGE EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT. REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT NON-FUNCTIONING CONCRETE WASHOUTS WITHIN 3 DAYS OR BY THE NEXT USE, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 4.4 ESTABLISH PROPER EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE FUELING AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AREAS FOR EQUIPMENT FUELING, CLEANING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR, AND NOTE THE LOCATION(S) ON THE SWPPP SITE MAPS. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED AREAS (I.E. THROUGH USE OF A TEMPORARY BERM). THE AREAS MUST NOT BE LOCATED IN ANY SURFACE WATER. SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 4.5 CONTROL EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE WASHING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE LOCATION(S) FOR VEHICLE WASHING, AND NOTE THE LOCATION(S) ON THE SWPPP SITE MAP. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA MUST BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS AND SOLVENTS. ENGINE DEGREASING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES IS ALSO PROHIBITED. 4.6 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL PLAN 1.ACCIDENTAL SPILL - DISCHARGE OF OIL OR OTHER HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IS SUBJECT TO REPORTING AND CLEAN UP REQUIREMENTS. IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL, THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IS TO BE NOTIFIED AT THEIR 24-HOUR TELEPHONE NUMBER: 651-649-5451. REFER TO SECTION 12 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 2.GROUNDWATER PROTECTION - SUBSTANCES THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLUTING SURFACE AND/OR GROUNDWATER MUST BE CONTROLLED BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THEY DO NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. AS AN EXAMPLE, SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IN THIS REGARD, POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE HANDLED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPACT THEY REPRESENT. SECTION 5: POST-CONSTRUCTION BMPS BMP DESCRIPTION: INFILTRATION BASIN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: NO HEAVY EQUIPMENT TO BE PLACED IN THESE AREAS, MINIMIZING THE COMPACTION. PERIODIC CHECK OF FLOW CONDITIONS TO TRACK DRAWDOWN OF THE WATER IN THE BASIN. THE DEVICE WILL BE INSPECTED AND CLEARED OF SEDIMENT BUILD UP TWICE PER YEAR AND AS NEEDED. PLANTED VEGETATION ALSO NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND REPLACED AS NECESSARY. INSPECTION WILL ALSO INCLUDE CHECKING FOR ANY PROBLEMATIC EROSION TAKING PLACE ON THE SLOPES OF THE BASIN. EROSION ISSUES WILL BE REPAIRED AS THEY ARE FOUND. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): SECTION 6: INSPECTIONS 6.1 INSPECTIONS 1.INSPECTION FREQUENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY BETWEEN THE TIME THIS SWPPP IS IMPLEMENTED AND FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION FILED WITH THE MPCA, ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND POLLUTANT CONTROLS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER. THE PURPOSE OF SITE INSPECTIONS IS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE OF POLLUTANT CONTROLS. THE INSPECTIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. BASED ON THESE INSPECTIONS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL DECIDE WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO MODIFY THIS SWPPP, ADD OR RELOCATE STRUCTURAL BMPS, OR WHATEVER ELSE MAY BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. IF THE SWPPP REQUIRES MODIFICATION, THOSE CHANGES TO THE SWPPP MUST BE DOCUMENTED. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE DUTY TO CAUSE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE REPAIRED, MODIFIED, MAINTAINED, SUPPLEMENTED, OR WHATEVER ELSE IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE POLLUTANT CONTROL. 2. INSPECTION PROCEDURES - EXAMPLES OF PARTICULAR ITEMS TO EVALUATE DURING SITE INSPECTIONS ARE LISTED BELOW. THIS LIST IS NOT INTENDED TO BE COMPREHENSIVE. DURING EACH INSPECTION THE INSPECTOR MUST EVALUATE OVERALL POLLUTANT CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS PARTICULAR DETAILS OF INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS. ADDITIONAL FACTORS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS APPROPRIATE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES. A. PRE-INSPECTION PREPARATION: 1. INSPECTORS SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS, PAST INSPECTION REPORTS, AND MAINTENANCE LOGS. 2. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO STORM WATER DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATERS AND WETLANDS; DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATERS AND WETLANDS HAVE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 23 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT, AND ADDRESSED IN THIS SWPPP. B. SITE ENTRY: 1. BEFORE ENTERING THE SITE, OBSERVE THE SURROUNDINGS AND VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTE AREAS FOR IN-DEPTH REVIEW AND ANY POTENTIAL ISSUES. 2. THIS IS A GOOD TIME TO VIEW CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD LOCATIONS AND PERIMETER CONTROLS. C. RECORDS REVIEW: 1. VERIFY THAT A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND APPLICATION FOR THE NPDES STORM WATER PERMIT, AND COPIES OF ALL CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTIONS ARE ON SITE. 2. VERIFY THAT THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION PHASING, IS GENERALLY BEING FOLLOWED. 3. SWPPPS ARE INTENDED TO BE DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS, VERIFY THAT AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES TO THE SWPPP ARE BEING MADE WHEN: A.A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON STORM WATER DISCHARGES B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE C. THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT D. SITE INSPECTION (NOTE TIMELINES FOR MAINTENANCE INCLUDED IN INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE REPORT) 1. INSPECT DISCHARGE POINTS DOWNSTREAM AND OFF-SITE AREAS FOR SIGNS OF IMPACT. 2. INSPECT PERIMETER CONTROLS: A. HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED? B. ARE VEHICLE TRACKING PADS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? ARE ADDITIONAL ENTRANCES/EXITS BEING USED THAT ARE NOT STABILIZED? C. ALL STORM DRAINS MUST BE PROTECTED AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS INSTALLED. D. ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EROSION PROTECTION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INACTIVITY. 3. COMPARE BMPS IN THE SWPPP WITH CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS: ARE REQUIRED BMPS IN PLACE; ARE ADDITIONAL BMPS NEEDED; ARE BMPS IN PLACE PROPERLY INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED? 4. INSPECT AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND ARE NOT CURRENTLY BEING WORKED. ANY UNSEEDED OR UNMULCHED BARE AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN IDLE FOR 7 DAYS SHOULD BE NOTED. 5. INSPECT AREAS WITH FINAL STABILIZATION. IN ORDER FOR FINAL STABILIZATION TO BE ACHIEVED, AREAS MUST HAVE A UNIFORM COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OVER ENTIRE AREA. TEMPORARY BMPS SHOULD BE REMOVED AND AREAS DISTURBED BY REMOVAL SEEDED AS NECESSARY. E. EXIT INTERVIEW: 1. DEBRIEF THE PERSON IN CHARGE. EXPLAIN THE IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES AND ANY AREAS OF CONCERN. F. A COPY OF THE COMPLETED INSPECTION REPORT MUST BE KEPT WITH THE SWPPP ON SITE. THE INSPECTION REPORT USED SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING: ·DATE & TIME OF INSPECTION ·NAME OF INSPECTOR(S) ·FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ·CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN, INCLUDING DATES, TIMES AND NAMES OF PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ·DATE & AMOUNT OF RAINFALL ·RECORD OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE FROM THE PROPERTY AND DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE ·NOTE TO UPDATE THE SWPPP 6.2 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE(S) OR POSITION(S): COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION NAME: NAME: POSITION: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: 6.3 CORRECTIVE ACTION LOG THE INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE FORM, AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, INCORPORATES BOTH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORTING INTO A SINGLE FORM. THIS FORM ALSO SPECIFIES THE TIME ALLOWED FOR CORRECTIONS TO BE PERFORMED. IF THE PARTY PERFORMING INSPECTIONS CHOOSES TO USE ANOTHER INSPECTION FORM, A SEPARATE CORRECTIVE ACTION LOG MUST BE PROVIDED. SECTION 7: RECORD KEEPING AND TRAINING 7.1 RECORDKEEPING RECORD RETENTION - THE OWNER MUST KEEP THE SWPPP INCLUDING ALL CHANGES MADE TO IT DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 7.2 OF THIS SWPPP), ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS ON FILE FOR THREE YEARS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (FINAL STABILIZATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION): 1.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT 2.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE 4.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 7.2 AMENDMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A RECORD LOG OF ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE SWPPP. AN EXAMPLE OF A SWPPP UPDATE LOG FORM CAN BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST. MODIFICATIONS TO THE SWPPP - THIS SWPPP INTENDS TO CONTROL WATER-BORNE AND LIQUID POLLUTANT DISCHARGES BY SOME COMBINATION OF INTERCEPTION, FILTRATION, AND CONTAINMENT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS IMPLEMENTING THIS SWPPP MUST REMAIN ALERT TO THE NEED TO PERIODICALLY REFINE AND UPDATE THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENDED GOALS. THIS SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO KEEP IT CURRENT WITH THE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED AT THE SITE. AMENDING THE SWPPP DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT HAS TO BE REPRINTED. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ADD ADDENDA, SKETCHES, NEW SECTIONS, AND/OR REVISED DRAWINGS. THIS SWPPP MUST BE UPDATED AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS, DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER: 1.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR UNDERGROUND WATERS. 2.INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY SITE OPERATORS, LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR UNDERGROUND WATERS OR THAT THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES. 3.THE SWPPP IS NOT ACHIEVING THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 4.THE MPCA HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT'S STORM WATER DISCHARGES MAY CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO NON-ATTAINMENT OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER STANDARD, OR THAT THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCORPORATE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. IN THIS CASE, THE SWPPP MUST BE UPDATED OR A SUPPLEMENTAL BMP ACTION PLAN DEVELOPED TO ADDRESS THE IDENTIFIED CONCERNS. 7.3 TRAINING THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST FULFILL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE RECORDS OF TRAINING IN THE SWPPP. REFRESHER TRAINING MUST BE ATTENDED EVERY THREE YEARS STARTING THREE YEARS, FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE 2018 GENERAL PERMIT (ISSUED 8/1/18). INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED INCLUDE: 1.INDIVIDUALS PREPARING THE SWPPP 2.INDIVIDUALS OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING, AND AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING INSPECTIONS. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ON SITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. 3.INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON A PROJECT MUST BE TRAINED IN THESE JOB DUTIES. THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING MUST BE COMMENSURATE WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL PERMIT. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES LISTED ABOVE MUST BE PRESENT ON THE SITE OR AVAILABLE TO THE SITE IN 72 HOURS. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE: 1.NAMES OF PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED 2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAMES OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING 3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE, INCLUDING NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING 4.DOCUMENTATION MUST BE KEPT WITH THE SWPPP. TRAINING RECORD/CERTIFICATION TEMPLATE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. INDIVIDUALS MUST BE TRAINED BY LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, OR PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUCH AS THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS, OR THE MPCA. SECTION 8: FINAL STABILIZATION / PERMIT TERMINATION FINAL STABILIZATION - TO ACHIEVE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING MEASURES AFTER ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 1.ALL SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, OR BY OTHER EQUIVALENT MEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS. REFER TO LANDSCAPING PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE OF VEGETATIVE COVER. 2.THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS CONSTRUCTED, MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SECTIONS 15, 16, 17, 18, AND 19 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS HAVE BEEN CLEAN OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS AND DITCHES ARE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT COVER. 3.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED. 4.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON LAND USED FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES FINAL STABILIZATION MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY RETURNING THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE. 5.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, INDIVIDUAL LOTS ARE CONSIDERED FINALLY STABILIZED IF THE STRUCTURE(S) ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE RESIDENCE HAS BEEN SOLD TO THE HOMEOWNER. ADDITIONALLY, THE PERMITTEE HAS DISTRIBUTED THE MPCA'S “HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET” TO THE HOMEOWNER TO INFORM THE HOMEOWNER OF THE NEED FOR, AND BENEFITS OF, PERMANENT COVER. PERMIT TERMINATION - TO ACHIEVE PERMIT TERMINATION FOR THE SITE, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 4 & 13 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 100' Principal Structure Setback from Long Lake Creek 20' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP GFE=958.0 FFE=959.0 LFE=950.0 GFE=955.0 FFE=956.0 LFE=947.0 GFE=949.5 FFE=951.5 LFE=942.5 GFE=956.0 FFE=957.0 LFE=948.0 BOTHWLOUTORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L 2 4 ' R40 ' 9 5 4 . 1 951.2 952.5 949.0 948.5 948.5 949 . 5 9 5 1 . 3 9 5 3 . 1 5 0 ' R O W LONG LAKE CREEK STA -1+00 TO 8+50 ORCHARD CREEK TRAIL 940 945 950 955 960 965 970 940 945 950 955 960 965 970 -0+50 0+00 95 1 . 2 95 1 . 2 4 0+50 95 2 . 3 95 2 . 3 8 1+00 95 2 . 3 95 2 . 5 1 1+50 95 0 . 4 95 0 . 6 6 2+00 94 7 . 9 94 9 . 0 4 2+50 94 5 . 5 94 8 . 5 0 3+00 94 4 . 7 94 8 . 5 0 3+50 94 4 . 9 94 8 . 5 0 4+00 94 5 . 4 94 8 . 5 1 4+50 94 5 . 9 94 8 . 8 0 5+00 94 4 . 9 94 9 . 5 4 5+50 94 5 . 8 95 0 . 4 4 6+00 94 6 . 7 95 1 . 3 4 6+50 94 9 . 0 95 2 . 2 4 7+00 95 0 . 5 95 3 . 1 4 7+50 95 0 . 7 95 4 . 0 4 8+00 2.28%1.80%-4.3 2 % 0.00% PV I S T A = 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 PV I E L E V = 9 5 1 . 2 4 PV I S T A = 7 + 5 3 . 5 6 PV I E L E V = 9 5 4 . 1 0 PVI STA:2+00.00 PVI ELEV:948.50 K:23.13 LVC:100.00 BV C S : 1 + 5 0 . 0 0 BV C E : 9 5 0 . 6 6 EV C S : 2 + 5 0 . 0 0 EV C E : 9 4 8 . 5 0 LP STA:2+50 LP ELEV:948.50 PVI STA:4+42.05 PVI ELEV:948.50 K:55.63 LVC:100.00 BV C S : 3 + 9 2 . 0 5 BV C E : 9 4 8 . 5 0 EV C S : 4 + 9 2 . 0 5 EV C E : 9 4 9 . 4 0 LP STA:3+92.05 LP ELEV:948.50 PVI STA:0+89.50 PVI ELEV:953.28 K:11.15 LVC:73.63 BV C S : 0 + 5 2 . 6 8 BV C E : 9 5 2 . 4 4 EV C S : 1 + 2 6 . 3 1 EV C E : 9 5 1 . 6 9 HP STA:0+78.08 HP ELEV:952.73 SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:40pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C8-STREET.dwg ---- C3.01 SITE PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SAWCUT LINE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE XX XX PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) WBPWETLAND BUFFER SIGN Jun 09, 2021 - 2:40pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-C9-DET.dwg C9.01 DETAILS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. 04/22/202050475 Eric T. Luth Registration No.Date: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. This certification is not valid unless wet signed in blue ink. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this survey which is available upon request at Sambatek, Minnetonka, MN office. 02/20/202040252 William L. Delaney 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update 12'12' 1 3B 3A 4 5 2 1.PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2.BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3.ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATION. 4.THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 4"-6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5.CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3"OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12"APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. 6.PLACE STAPLES/STAKES PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE SLOPE BEING APPLIED. NOTES: 1.IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. 2.FOLLOW EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT SELECTION 4"- 6" 6" 6" 12" 3" N.T.S. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET N.T.S. 1 4 6 7 5 NOTES: 1.HORIZONTAL STAPLE SPACING SHOULD BE ALTERED IF NECESSARY TO ALLOW STAPLES TO SECURE THE CRITICAL POINTS ALONG THE CHANNEL SURFACE. 2.IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY ANCHOR THE BLANKETS. 3.FOLLOW EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT SELECTION. 4"-6" 6" 6" B A B A 8 3 12" 2 1.PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2.BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12"APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12"PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3.ROLL CENTER BLANKET IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW IN BOTTOM OF CHANNEL. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 4.PLACE CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A 4"-6" OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" APART AND 4" ON CENTER TO SECURE BLANKETS. 5.FULL LENGTH EDGE OF BLANKETS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. 6.ADJACENT BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED APPROXIMATELY 4"-6" (DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE) AND STAPLED. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE SEAM STITCH ON THE BLANKET BEING OVERLAPPED. 7.IN HIGH FLOW CHANNEL APPLICATIONS, A STAPLE CHECK SLOT IS RECOMMENDED AT 30 TO 40 FOOT (9m-12m) INTERVALS. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" APART AND 4" ON CENTER OVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL. 8.THE TERMINAL END OF THE BLANKETS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) APART IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. 9.PLACE STAPLE/STAKES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE CHANNEL FLOW OR SHORELINE APPLICATION CRITICAL POINTS A.OVERLAPS AND SEAMS B.PROJECTED WATER LINE C.CHANNEL BOTTOM/SIDE SLOPE VERTICES 6" 4"-6" 6" 4" 4" C C EROSION CONTROL BLANKET N.T.S. 8" HDPE DRAINTILE SEE BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL FOR COMPLETE BASIN SECTION. REFER TO GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR BASIN AND DRAINTILE CONFIGURATIONDRAINTILE OUTLET TO OCS IE=941.60 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS 101) RE=948.10 15" DIAMETER ORIFICE IE=945.60 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL (OCS 101) 15" RCP OUTLET PIPE IE=941.60 N.T.S. PLANT MATERIAL TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT. NATIVE PLANTS RECOMMENDED. 6" ABOVE BASIN BOTTOM MEDIA WIDTH-VARIES BOTTOM-VARIES 3H:1L MAX. PAVEMENT UNDISTURBED, UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL BOTTOM ELEVATION =944.10 FILTER MEDIA UNCOMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS HOMOGENOUS BLEND OF 70% SAND (5% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE, MAXIMUM OF 60% PASSING THE #40 SIEVE) 30% ORGANIC (PEAT MOSS, HYPNUM OR SPHAGNUM) (BY VOLUME) PH=5.5-7.0 ORGANIC CONTENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1% PER ASTM D 2974 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT TYPE 1) OVER GRAVEL BLANKET - EXTENDING 1-2' FROM UNDERDRAIN PIPE SIDES. UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET 1-1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE 8" HDPE PERFORATED DRAINTILE 1: 3 ( M I N ) T Y P 0.25% (MAX) TYP. 1-2' 30 " MI N . BIOFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS GRASS BUFFER STRIP BASIN BOTTOM EL=944.10 8" PVC WYE 45° LONG RADIUS BEND 8" PVC CLEANOUT STACK FEMALE ADAPTOR FINISHED GRADE N.T.S. TYPICAL CLEANOUT LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 OUTLOT A BIOFILTRATION BASIN BOT: 944.10 OUT: 945.60 HWL: 948.31 E O F 9 4 8 . 8 6 100' Principal Structure Setback from Long Lake Creek 20' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer 30' Wetland Buffer WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBPWBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP WBP GFE=982.0 FFE=983.0 LFE=974.0 GFE=958.0 FFE=959.0 LFE=950.0 GFE=955.0 FFE=956.0 LFE=947.0 GFE=949.5 FFE=951.5 LFE=942.5 GFE=956.0 FFE=957.0 LFE=948.0 BOTHWLOUTORCHARD C R E E K T R A I L A 2 4 ' R40 ' S U B D I V I S I O N N O . 1 S E 1 / 4 O F S E 1 / 4 75' EX. CREEK SETBACK 100' EX. CREEK SETBACK 40' EX. WETLAND SETBACK 50' EX. WETLAND SETBACK 40' EX. WETLAND SETBACK 50' EX. WETLAND SETBACK 50' EX. WETLAND SETBACK 10' EX. WETLAND SETBACK LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SCALE IN FEET 0 12060 NORTH Jun 09, 2021 - 2:40pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-L3-TREE.dwg L3.01 TREE - TREE INVENTORY PLAN Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SAWCUT LINE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE XX XX PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) TREE DATA KEYED TO # IS LOCATED ON SHEET L.02 TREE REVIEWED FOR GRADING IMPACT TO CRITICAL ROOT ZONE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS FOR DECIDUOUS = 1.5 X DIAMETER IN FEET = RADIUS FOR CONIFEROUS = HEIGHT / 5 = RADIUS OR 5' MIN. RADIUS TREE TO BE REMOVED BECAUSE 30% OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE DISTURBED TREE # 822 30' RED PINE POOR CONDITION TREE# 872 9" GREEN ASH GOOD CONDITION Jun 09, 2021 - 2:40pm - User:jbalzer L:\PROJECTS\20658.03\CAD\Civil\Sheets\20658.03-L3-TREE.dwg L3.02 TREE INVENTORY DATA Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: Client GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 ORCHARD CREEK ORONO, MN JEB CJS ETL FINAL 04/22/2020 20658.03 04/22/20 City Submittal 05/01/20 MCWD Submittal 05/04/20 City Resubmittal 07/22/20 City Resubmittal 04/01/21 Final Plat 05/19/21 Final Plat City Comments 06/09/21 Stormwater Basin Update TREE TAGGING - 20658 Tag ID No.DBH Tree Species Latin Condition Comments 670 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 671 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 672 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 673 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 674 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 675 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 676 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 677 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor L 678 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 679 9 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 680 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 681 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 682 9 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 683 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 684 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 685 10 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Poor L 686 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 687 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 688 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 689 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 690 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 691 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 692 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 693 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 694 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 695 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 696 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 697 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 698 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 699 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 700 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 701 15 Basswood Tilia americana Good 702 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 703 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 704 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 705 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 706 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 707 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 708 6 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 709 19 Black Walnut Juglans nigra Good 710 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 711 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 712 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 713 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 714 6 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 715 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 716 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 717 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 718 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 719 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 720 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 721 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 722 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 723 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 724 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 725 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 726 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 727 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 728 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 729 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 730 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 731 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor L 732 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 733 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 734 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 735 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 736 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 737 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 738 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 739 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 740 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 741 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 742 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 743 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 744 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 745 24 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 746 6 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 747 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 748 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 749 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 750 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor 751 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 752 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 753 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 754 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 755 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 756 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 757 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 758 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 759 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 760 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 761 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 762 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 763 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor L 764 12 Black Walnut Juglans nigra Good 765 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 766 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 767 6 Apple Malus spp Good 768 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 769 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 770 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 771 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 772 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 773 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 774 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 775 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 776 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 777 6 Apple Malus spp Poor L 778 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor I - broke 779 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 780 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 781 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 782 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 783 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 784 6 Apple Malus spp Poor L 785 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 786 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 787 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 788 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 789 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 790 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 791 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 792 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 793 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I 794 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 795 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 796 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 797 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 798 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 799 20 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 800 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 801 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 802 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 803 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 804 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 805 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 806 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 807 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 808 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 809 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 810 25 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 811 25 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 812 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 813 40 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 814 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 815 40 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 816 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 817 40 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 818 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 819 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 820 10 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 821 6 Hackberry Juglans nigra Good 822 30 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Poor S - 1/2 Dead 823 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 824 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 825 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 826 12 Black Walnut Juglans nigra Poor L 827 40 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 828 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 829 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 830 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 831 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 832 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 833 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 834 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 835 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor L 836 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 837 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 838 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 839 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 840 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 841 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 842 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 843 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 844 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 845 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 846 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 847 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 848 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 849 10 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 850 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 851 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 852 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 853 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 854 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 855 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 856 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 857 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 858 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 859 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 860 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 861 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 862 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 863 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 864 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 865 50 White Pine Pinus strobus Good 866 50 White Pine Pinus strobus Good 867 25 White Pine Pinus strobus Good 868 50 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Poor S - 1/2 Dead 869 50 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 870 50 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 871 45 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 872 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 873 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 874 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 875 12 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 876 40 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 877 40 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 878 40 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Poor S - Sparse 879 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 880 40 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 881 40 Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Good 882 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 883 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 884 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 885 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 886 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 887 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 888 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor MS 889 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 890 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor MS 891 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 892 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 893 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 894 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 895 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 896 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 897 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 898 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 899 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 900 15 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 901 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 902 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 903 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 904 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 905 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 906 15 Siberian Elm Ulmus pumula Poor MS 907 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 908 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 909 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 910 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 911 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 912 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 913 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 914 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 915 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 916 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 917 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 918 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 919 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 920 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 921 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 922 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 923 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 924 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 925 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 926 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 927 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 928 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 929 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 930 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 931 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 932 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor S 933 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I 934 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor 935 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 936 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 937 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 938 21 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 939 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 940 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 941 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 942 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 943 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 944 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 945 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 946 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 947 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 948 17 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 949 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 950 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 951 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 952 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 953 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 954 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 955 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 956 23 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 957 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 958 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 959 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 960 20 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 961 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 962 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 963 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 964 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 965 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 966 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 967 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 968 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 969 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 970 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 971 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 972 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 973 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 974 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 975 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 976 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 977 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 978 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 979 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 980 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 981 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 982 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 983 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 984 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 985 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 986 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 987 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 988 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 989 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 990 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 991 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 992 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 993 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 994 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 995 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 996 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 997 20 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 998 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 999 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1000 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1001 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1002 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1003 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1004 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1005 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1006 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1007 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1008 24 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1009 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1010 16 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1011 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1012 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1013 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1014 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor 1015 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1016 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1017 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1018 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1019 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1020 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1021 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1022 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1023 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1024 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1025 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1026 7 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1027 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1028 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1029 15 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1030 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1031 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1032 26 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor S - Sparse 1033 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1034 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1035 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1036 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1037 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1038 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1039 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1040 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1041 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1042 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1043 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1044 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1045 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1046 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1047 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1048 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1049 22 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1050 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1051 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 1052 15 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1053 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1054 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1055 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1056 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1057 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S - Sparse 1058 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1059 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1060 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1061 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1062 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1063 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1064 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1065 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1066 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1067 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I 1068 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1069 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1070 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1071 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1072 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1073 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1074 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1075 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1076 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1077 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1078 13 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1079 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1080 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1081 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1082 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1083 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1084 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1085 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1086 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1087 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1088 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1089 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1090 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1091 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1092 11 River Birch Betula nigra Poor L 1093 40 White Pine Pinus strobus Good 1094 50 White Pine Pinus strobus Excellent 1095 16 Silver Maple Acer saccharinum Good 1096 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1097 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1098 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS - Split 1099 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor 1100 50 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 1101 13 Silver Maple Acer saccharinum Poor MS - Split 1102 45 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 1103 7 Siberian Elm Ulmus pumula Good 1104 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS - Split 1105 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1106 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1107 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1108 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1109 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1110 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1111 12 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Poor MS - Split 1112 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1113 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1114 12 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1115 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1116 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1117 7 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1118 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1119 11 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1120 21 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1121 10 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1122 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1123 11 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1124 8 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1125 27 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 1126 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1127 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1128 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1129 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1130 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS - Split 1131 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 1132 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1133 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1134 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1135 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1136 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1137 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1138 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1139 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1140 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1141 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1142 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1143 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1144 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1145 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1146 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1147 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1148 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1149 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS - Split 1150 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1151 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1152 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1153 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1154 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1155 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1156 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1157 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1158 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1159 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1160 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1161 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1162 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1163 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1164 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor S - 1/2 Dead 1165 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1166 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1167 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1168 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1169 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1170 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1171 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1172 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1173 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1174 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1175 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1176 27 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1177 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1178 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1179 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1180 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1181 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1182 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1183 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1184 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1185 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1186 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1187 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1188 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1189 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1190 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1191 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1192 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1193 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1194 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1195 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1196 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1197 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1198 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1199 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1200 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1201 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1202 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1203 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1204 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1205 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1206 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1207 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1208 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1209 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1210 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1211 13 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1212 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1213 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1214 22 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1215 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1216 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1217 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1218 12 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1219 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1220 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1221 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1222 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1223 7 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1224 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1225 7 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1226 19 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1227 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1228 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1229 27 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1230 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1231 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1232 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1233 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1234 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1235 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1236 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1237 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1238 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1239 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1240 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1241 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1242 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1243 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1244 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1245 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1246 29 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1247 26 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1248 23 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1249 26 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1250 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1251 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1252 40 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 1253 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1254 33 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1255 24 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor MS - Split 1256 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1257 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1258 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1259 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1260 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1261 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1262 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1263 17 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1264 20 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1265 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1266 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1267 12 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S - Sparse 1268 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1269 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1270 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1271 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor L 1272 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1273 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1274 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1275 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1276 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1277 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1278 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1279 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1280 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1281 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1282 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1283 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1284 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1285 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1286 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1287 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS - Split 1288 9 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1289 20 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I 1290 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1291 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1292 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1293 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1294 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1295 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1296 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1297 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1298 21 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1299 17 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1300 11 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1301 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1302 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1303 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1304 22 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1305 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1306 18 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1307 31 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1308 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1309 16 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1310 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1311 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1312 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1313 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1314 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1315 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1316 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1317 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1318 6 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Good 1319 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor L, I, MS - Split 1320 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1321 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1322 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1323 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1324 36 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1325 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1326 33 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1327 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1328 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1329 22 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1330 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S - Sparse 1331 8 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1332 7 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1333 12 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1334 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1335 16 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1336 10 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Good 1337 7 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1338 7 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1339 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1340 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1341 10 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1342 14 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor L 1343 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1344 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1345 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1346 22 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1347 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1348 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1349 8 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1350 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1351 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1352 15 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1353 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1354 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor MS - Split 1355 22 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1356 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1357 26 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1358 26 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1359 8 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1360 11 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1361 11 American Elm Populus tremuloides Good 1362 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1363 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1364 8 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1365 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1366 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1367 7 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1368 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Poor S 1369 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Good 1370 9 Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Good 1371 11 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 1372 21 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1373 10 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Poor S 1374 10 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1375 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1376 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor S 1377 24 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor S 1378 29 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1379 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1380 33 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1381 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1382 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1383 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1384 8 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1385 10 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1386 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1387 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1388 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1389 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1390 17 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1391 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor L 1392 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, MS 1393 18 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1394 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1395 26 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1396 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1397 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor S 1398 33 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1399 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor MS 1400 20 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1401 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1402 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1403 7 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1404 24 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1405 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1406 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1407 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1408 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1409 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor MS 1410 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1411 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1412 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1413 12 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1414 14 Red Oak Quercus rubra Poor L 1415 12 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1416 18 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1417 17 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1418 13 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1419 14 Basswood Tilia americana Good 1420 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1421 9 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1422 30 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1423 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1424 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1425 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1426 17 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1427 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1428 31 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1429 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1430 24 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1431 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS - Split 1432 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1433 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1434 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1435 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1436 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1437 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1438 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1439 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1440 15 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1441 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1442 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1443 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, S - Broke? 1444 34 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1445 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1446 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1447 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1448 18 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1449 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1450 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1451 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1452 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1453 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1454 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1455 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1456 14 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1457 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1458 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L, I 1459 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1460 34 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1461 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1462 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor L 1463 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1464 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1465 11 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1466 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1467 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1468 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1469 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1470 14 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1471 27 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1472 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1473 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1474 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1475 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1476 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1477 7 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 1478 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1479 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I, MS 1480 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 1481 9 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 1482 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1483 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Poor L, I 1484 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1485 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1486 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1487 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1488 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 1489 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1490 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1491 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1492 19 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1493 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1494 6 Box Elder Tilia americana Poor L, I, MS 1495 11 Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Good 1496 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1497 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1498 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1499 26 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1500 6 Silver Maple Acer saccharinum Poor L, I 1501 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1502 14 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Good 1503 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor MS, S 1504 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS, S 1505 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1506 23 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1507 13 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Good 1508 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1509 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1510 14 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1511 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1512 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1513 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1514 17 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1515 9 Green Ash Ulmus americana Good 1516 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1517 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1518 7 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1519 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1520 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1521 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1522 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1523 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1524 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1525 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1526 28 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 1527 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1528 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1529 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1530 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1531 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1532 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1533 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1534 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1535 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1536 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1537 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1538 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1539 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1540 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1541 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1542 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1543 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1544 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1545 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1546 8 White Oak Quercus alba Good 1547 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1548 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1549 6 Red Oak Quercus rubra Good 1550 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1551 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1552 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1553 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1554 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1555 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1556 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1557 9 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1558 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1559 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1560 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1561 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1562 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1563 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1564 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1565 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor l 1566 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1567 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1568 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1569 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1570 23 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1571 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1572 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1573 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1574 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1575 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1576 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1577 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1578 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1579 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1580 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1581 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1582 17 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1583 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1584 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1585 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1586 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1587 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1588 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1589 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1590 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1591 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1592 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1593 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1594 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1595 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1596 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1597 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1598 18 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1599 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1600 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1601 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1602 24 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1603 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1604 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1605 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1606 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1607 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1608 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1609 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1610 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1611 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1612 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1613 40 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1614 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1615 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1616 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1617 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1618 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1619 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1620 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1621 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1622 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1623 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1624 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1625 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1626 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1627 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1628 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1629 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1630 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1631 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1632 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1633 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1634 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1635 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1636 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1637 11 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Poor L, I, MS 1638 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1639 10 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1640 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1641 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1642 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1643 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1644 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1645 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1646 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1647 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1648 13 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Poor MS 1649 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1650 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1651 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1652 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1653 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1654 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1655 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1656 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1657 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1658 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1659 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1660 22 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor I 1661 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1662 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1663 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 1664 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1665 25 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1666 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1667 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1668 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1669 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1670 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1671 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1672 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1673 18 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1674 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1675 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1676 8 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1677 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1678 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1679 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1680 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1681 32 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1682 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1683 22 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1684 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1685 15 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1686 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1687 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1688 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1689 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1690 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1691 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1692 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1693 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1694 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor S - 1/2 Dead 1695 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1696 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1697 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1698 13 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1699 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1700 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor S 1701 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1702 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1703 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1704 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1705 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1706 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1707 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1708 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1709 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1710 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1711 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1712 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1713 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1714 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1715 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1716 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1717 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1718 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S 1719 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1720 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1721 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S 1722 20 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S 1723 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1724 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1725 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1726 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1727 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1728 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1729 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1730 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1731 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 1732 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1733 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1734 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1735 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1736 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1737 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1738 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1739 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor I 1740 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor MS 1741 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1742 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1743 22 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1744 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1745 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1746 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1747 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1748 13 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1749 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1750 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1751 15 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1752 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1753 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1754 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1755 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1756 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1757 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1758 27 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, MS 1759 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, MS 1760 7 Black Ash Fraxinus nigra Good 1761 17 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1762 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1763 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1764 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1765 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1766 11 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1767 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1768 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1769 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1770 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1771 14 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1772 21 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1773 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1774 16 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1775 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1776 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1777 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1778 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1779 12 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1780 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1781 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1782 19 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1783 10 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1784 10 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, MS 1785 22 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1786 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1787 12 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1788 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1789 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1790 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1791 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1792 13 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1793 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1794 9 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1795 16 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1796 8 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I 1797 6 American Elm Ulmus americana Good 1798 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1799 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1800 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1801 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L 1802 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1803 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1804 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Good 1805 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1806 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1807 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1808 14 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1809 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1810 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor MS 1811 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S 1812 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1813 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1814 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1815 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1816 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1817 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor L 1818 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1819 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1820 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1821 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1822 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1823 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1824 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1825 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1826 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1827 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1828 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1829 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1830 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1831 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1832 12 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1833 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1834 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1835 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1836 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1837 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1838 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1839 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1840 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1841 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1842 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1843 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1844 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1845 9 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1846 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1847 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1848 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1849 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1850 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1851 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1852 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1853 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1854 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1855 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1856 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Poor MS 1857 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1858 40 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor S 1859 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1860 20 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Good 1861 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor MS 1862 15 Red Pine Pinus resinosa Excellent 1863 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1864 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1865 30 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1866 35 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1867 15 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1868 15 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Poor I 1869 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1870 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1871 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1872 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1873 11 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1874 25 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Good 1875 7 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1876 8 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1877 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Good 1878 6 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS 1879 7 Box Elder Acer negundo Poor L, I, MS DEVELOPER/OWNER GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION 5159 MAIN STREET SUITE 200 ORONO, MN 55359 TEL CONTACT: CIVIL ENGINEER SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: ERIC LUTH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT:WILLIAM DELANEY SURVEYOR SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TEL 763-476-6010 CONTACT: CRAIG JOHNSON ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION Gordon James Construction Orono, Minnesota Presented by: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP PROJECT CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: N.T.S. CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2013) MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2018 EDITION) GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS LUCE L I N E S T A T E T R A I L 12 O R O N O O R C H A R D R D PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE SHEET C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.01 NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS C4.01 FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE C4.02 FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE C4.03 FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE C5.01 DETAILS CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 2021 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS C1.01TITLE SHEET ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION 71 S U B D I V I S I O N N O . 1 S E 1 / 4 O F S E 1 / 4 S U B D I V I S I O N N O . 1 S E 1 / 4 O F S E 1 / 4 S U B D I V I S I O N N O . 1 S E 1 / 4 O F S E 1 / 4 SCALE IN FEET 0 200100 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL XX. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N00°01'40'E FOR THE WEST LINE OF THE NE 1 4 OF NE 1 4 SECTION 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 04/17/2020. FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 47481 ELECTRIC METER LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FLARED END SECTION ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST SIGN TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING LINE BUILDING CANOPY CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NGVD29. BENCHMARK #1 TNH NEAR MAIN ENTRANCE IN CURB ELEV.= 955.34 BENCHMARK #2 FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.= 982.01 LEGEND BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL O R O N O O R C H A R D R D C2.01EXISTING CONDITIONS 72 ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL General 1.Contractor shall not store any equipment or materials in the Orchard Road right-of-way. 2.Contractor shall control traffic on Orchard Road per City of Orono standards. Contractor shall submit traffic control plan for work along Orchard Road. 3.Contractor shall provide continuous driveway access for all residents along the project alignment. 4.Working Hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday - Friday. Weekend and Holiday working hours must be requested and approved and shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.. Force Main 1.Force main material shall be HDPE SDR-11 sized for IPS complying with ASTM D2239 and ASTM D3035. Fittings shall be molded and comply with ASTM D3261, ASTM D2683, or ASTM F1056 depending on proposed coupling method. 2.Force main shall have minimum 8 feet of ground cover. 3.Force main to be pressure tested to 100 psi for 1 hour with no leakage. 4.Service connections to be made per EOne requirements. 5.Curb stop shutoffs shall be constructed just inside of the property line as shown on drawings and be capped on the residential side. Earthwork 1.Excavate trenches sufficiently wide to enable installation and allow inspection. 2.Contractor shall dewater all open trench areas to a depth of at least 12 inches below invert of forcemain per City of Orono standards. 3.Place and compact backfill materials in maximum 12 inch lifts. 4.Restore disturbed areas to original grade. Tracer Wire 1.Tracer wire shall be installed for the entire length of force main. 2.Tracer wire shall be minimum 12 AWG copper clad steel rated to 30 volts and be insulated with minimum 30 mil HDPE per ASTM D1248. 3.Tracer wires shall be interconnected with approved at-grade access box at HDD/open cut transition locations or maximum 500 foot spacings and be grounded at all ends. Horizontal Directional Drilling 1.Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing utilities withing the construction limits. 2.Contractor shall protect open drilling pits from surface water entering. 3.Contractor shall submit proposed alignment and drilling pit locations to Engineer before beginning construction. 4.The drilling equipment shall be capable of placing the pipe as shown on the plans. 5.Drill path to be monitored for depth, pitch, and position at all times. The guidance system shall be capable of installing pipe within 1 ½ inches of the plan vertical and 2 inches of the plan horizontal. 6.Pull back forces shall not exceed the allowable pulling forces for the pipe being installed. 7.Drilling fluid shall be a mixture of water and bentonite clay and shall be suitable for existing soil conditions. Contractor shall provide water and bentonite clay. 8.Disposal of excess fluid and spoils shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C3.01NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS 73 ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P W B P CS CS CS CS CS CO R/W R/W 925 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 925 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 0+00 95 1 . 0 0+50 95 0 . 8 1+00 95 0 . 2 1+50 94 7 . 7 95 0 . 3 0 2+00 94 6 . 4 94 9 . 5 8 2+50 94 5 . 4 94 9 . 1 0 3+00 94 5 . 7 94 8 . 4 3 3+50 94 5 . 9 94 7 . 6 5 4+00 94 5 . 2 94 7 . 1 3 4+50 94 4 . 8 94 6 . 6 1 5+00 94 4 . 5 94 4 . 9 7 5+50 94 5 . 9 94 5 . 9 5 6+00 94 8 . 8 94 8 . 8 2 6+50 95 1 . 3 95 1 . 2 8 7+00 95 2 . 6 95 2 . 5 5 7+50 95 1 . 7 95 1 . 9 1 7+71.74 95 1 . 4 95 1 . 4 1 1 1 4" SERVICE LATERAL 1 1 4" SERVICE LATERAL 8 F T M I N I M U M C O V E R EXISTING GRADE FUTURE CUL-DE-SAC GRADE 1 14" SERVICE LATERALS CLEANOUT SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH 10050 A p r 0 1 , 2 0 2 1 - 3 : 3 5 p m - U s e r : j g o n z a l e z L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 \ C A D \ C i v i l \ S h e e t s \ F o r c e M a i n \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 - C 4 - U T I L _ F M . d w g C4.01FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 0+00 TO STA 7+71.41 PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 2" HDPE SDR11 FO R C E M A I N FUTURE CUL-DE-SAC 74 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS FORCEMAIN (SAN.) SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED S LEGEND EXISTING CO CS CLEAN OUT CURB STUB POWER POLE CAUTION CS-2 CS-4 CS-3 CS-1 CS-5 ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION TERMINAL FLUSHING CONNECTION TERMINAL FLUSHING CONNECTION 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 965 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 965 7+71.84 95 1 . 4 95 1 . 4 1 8+00 95 2 . 1 8+50 95 5 . 2 9+00 95 7 . 5 9+50 95 7 . 3 10+00 95 6 . 9 10+50 95 5 . 7 11+00 95 5 . 2 11+50 95 0 . 8 12+00 94 8 . 3 12+50 94 9 . 3 13+00 94 4 . 8 13+50 94 6 . 1 14+00 94 7 . 6 14+50 94 7 . 7 15+00 94 5 . 7 15+50 94 4 . 6 16+00 94 4 . 6 16+50 94 3 . 7 17+00 94 5 . 1 17+50 94 7 . 5 18+00 94 9 . 5 18+50 95 0 . 8 19+00 95 3 . 3 19+45.35 95 6 . 3 8 F T M I N I M U M C O V E R 8 F T M I N I M U M C O V E R EXISTING GRADE CLEANOUT CO R/W CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CLEANOUT SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH 10050 A p r 0 1 , 2 0 2 1 - 3 : 3 4 p m - U s e r : j g o n z a l e z L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 \ C A D \ C i v i l \ S h e e t s \ F o r c e M a i n \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 - C 4 - U T I L _ F M . d w g PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 2" HDP E S D R 1 1 F O R C E M A I N C4.02FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 7+71.74 TO STA 19+45.35 75 OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS FORCEMAIN (SAN.) SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED S LEGEND EXISTING CO CS CLEAN OUT CURB STUB POWER POLE CAUTION ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION CONSTRUCTION LIMITS MN DNR R/W 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 965 930 935 940 945 950 955 960 965 19+45.35 95 6 . 3 19+50 95 7 . 0 20+00 96 1 . 4 20+50 96 0 . 4 21+00 95 2 . 4 21+50 95 0 . 9 22+00 94 7 . 5 22+50 94 8 . 2 23+00 94 9 . 8 23+50 95 0 . 1 24+00 95 1 . 0 24+50 95 2 . 0 25+00 95 6 . 1 25+50 95 5 . 4 26+00 8 F T M I N I M U M C O V E R EXISTING GRADE EXISTING SANMH RIM EL. 955.22 IE. 947.00 (NW) IE. 943.17 (SE) CONNECT TO EXISTING MH SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH 10050 A p r 0 1 , 2 0 2 1 - 3 : 3 0 p m - U s e r : j g o n z a l e z L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 \ C A D \ C i v i l \ S h e e t s \ F o r c e M a i n \ 2 0 6 5 8 . 0 3 - C 4 - U T I L _ F M . d w g PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 2" HDPE SDR11 FORCE MAIN C4.03FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE STA 19+45.35 TO STA 26+00 76 OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS FORCEMAIN (SAN.) SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED S LEGEND EXISTING CO CS CLEAN OUT CURB STUB POWER POLE CAUTION ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION PAUL J. HERUBIN 4524304/01/2021PJH JJG JJG 20658.03 1 4/1/21 JJG FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 2" FORCEMAIN 48" 27" 1' - 4 " 4' 7" A A NOTE: PROVIDE MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2"/FOOT FROM FORCEMAIN TO GRAVITY SEWER AT ALL POINTS WITHIN MANHOLE SECTION A-A STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE AS N E E D E D EXISTING SEWERSLOPE MANHOLE CASTING AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642-B, ESS BROS. 309, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH TWO (2) CONCEALED PICK HOLES. GASKETED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION (TYP) STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SEE DETAIL) 2" ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (MIN. 2, MAX. 4) ADJUST CASTING TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHED BITUMINOUS GRADE. N.T.S. 1 FORCEMAIN CONNECTION TO MANHOLE BRING TRACER WIRE INTO MANHOLE AT PIPE CONNECTION, PROVIDE 3' MIN COIL OF TRACER WIRE WITHIN THE MANHOLE C5.01DETAILS 77 • • • • Brass components conform to ASTM B62 and ASTM B584, UNS C83600 -85 or ASTM B584, UNS C84400 -81-3-7-9 (latest revision) Lid and Base made of Cast Iron per ASTM A48, Class 25 Upper Section made of steel pipe Coated with black dip 85-5-5-5 (latest revision) N.T.S. 2 CURB BOXES - 5612 ORCHARD CREEK LOW PRESSURE SEWER EXTENSION ELBOW SS STRAP 24" OC BY OTHERS ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SAMBATEK, INC. ORCHARD CREEK C.R. DOC. NO. SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter quarter Section distant 457-1/2 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running south 67 degrees 10 minutes West, a distance of 570-1/2 feet; thence running Southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet, to a point on West line of said quarter Section distant 368 feet North of the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter section. Also that part of Subdivision No. 1 S.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 Subdivision No. 1 S.W. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 and Subdivision No. 1 of Lot No. 3, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Westerly and Southwesterly direction to a point in the centerline of said creek distant 180 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner of said quarter quarter Section; thence in a straight line Southwesterly to said Southwest corner; thence East to the Southeast corner of said Section; thence North a distance of 374 feet; thence West a distance of 24 feet; thence North a distance of 337.82 feet; thence East a distance of 24 feet to a point 711.82 feet North of the southeast corner of said quarter quarter section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty-five (35) Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the South 711.82 feet thereof and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. There is hereby excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) of Section Three (3), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, being a strip of land 43 feet in width and lying northerly of and adjacent to the following described line: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE 1/4) distant 457 1/2, feet South of the northeast corner of said Section 3; thence running South 67 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 570 1/2 feet, thence running southwesterly on a right curve with a radius of 5729.65 feet, a distance of 833.45 feet to a point on west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 NE1/4) distant 368 feet North of the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼ NE 1/4.). And, there is hereby further excepted from the foregoing description that part which is described as follows, to-wit: That part of the S.E. ¼ of the S.E. ¼ of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Section 34, which point is 340 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence running Southwesterly, making an angle to the right, of 36 degrees 45 minutes from said East line of said Section, a distance of 220 feet to the centerline of the creek which flows from Long Lake in Town of Orono Southwesterly into Mud Lake near Lake Minnetonka; thence following the centerline of the bed of said creek in a Northeasterly direction, a distance of 150 feet more or less to a point in the centerline of said creek that intersects said East line of said Section; thence North to the beginning. Also that part of the West 250 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter (S.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4) of Section Thirty five (35), Township One Hundred Eighteen (118), Range Twenty-three (23), lying North of the centerline of said creek and Southerly of the centerline of Orono Orchard Road. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ORCHARD CREEK, and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use the easements as created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. ONYX PERFORMANCE INVESTMENTS, LLC SIGNED: , as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, by , as of Onyx Performance Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires I Mark R. Salo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 . Mark R. Salo, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43933 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, by Mark R. Salo. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA This plat of ORCHARD CREEK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _______________, 20_____ and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Orono, Minnesota By: Mayor By: Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By: , Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of ORCHARD CREEK was recorded in this office this _______ day of _________________, 20_____, at ______ o'clock ____ .M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder By: , Deputy B L O C K 1 Line Table Line # L1 L2 Length 88.52 81.89 Direction N68°17'16"E N68°17'16"E OUTLOT A 1 2 3 4 Curve Table Curve # C1 C2 C3 Length L=55.10 L=50.76 L=50.30 Radius R=423.00 R=423.00 R=423.00 Delta Δ=7°27'47" Δ=6°52'34" Δ=6°48'47" ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH 5 SITE ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SAMBATEK, INC. ORCHARD CREEK C.R. DOC. NO. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS N.T.S. SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 & SECTIONS 34 & 35, T. 118, R. 23, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 43933. DENOTES MONUMENT NOT SET, PROPERTY CORNER WITHIN ROADWAY. DENOTES HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND. DENOTES COMPUTED SECTION CORNER. DENOTES OPEN 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST. 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 80 160 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING PLAT BOUNDARY LINES AND LOT LINES ADJOINING OUTLOT A, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 10 5 5 10 Prepared By: Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this council item is to gain council approval to appoint the new Public Works Streets and Stormwater Supervisor. 2. Background. The Public Works Supervisor (Streets and Stormwater) position replaces the vacancy left by D.J. when he got promoted to Superintendent. At the May 24th meeting the City Council authorized staff to begin the recruiting and replacement process. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the position involved advertising the position, application screening, and interviews. The selection committee consisted of the Public Works Superintendent, Parks and GC Superintendent, Public Works Supervisor, City Administrator and Community Development Director. 4. Recommended Candidate. The recommended candidate is Mr. Brent Weldon. Brent has been with Hennepin County Public Works for 16 years, the past 10 as a Forman. 5. Recommended Compensation. I recommended that Mr. Weldon be appointed to the position of Public Works Supervisor effective July 27th, 2021. A. Salary. Starting salary of $35.40 /Hr. (Grade 10, Step 5) B. Vacation. Starting vacation to be earned at a rate or 15 days (120 hours) per year and then per the schedule set out in the Collective bargaining agreement and personnel handbook. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint Mr. Brent Weldon as the Public Works Supervisor. Item No.: 13 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Appointment of Public Works Supervisor (Streets and Stormwater) Presenter: D.J. Goman Public Works Superintendent Agenda Section: Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to have Pack 285 – Arrow of Light (AOL) Den to attend a council meeting as part of them completing the requirements as a AOL and to move on to BSA Scouts. 2. Background. The 6 AOL scouts are currently WEBLO Scouts and they are working to complete and move on to BSA scouts. The module for this meeting is called "Building a Better World" and this is requirement #4 which is to "Meet with a government or community leader, and learn about his or her role in your community and to discuss with the leader an important issue facing your community. The boys are all 10 years old and all will be attending 5th Grade at Grandview Middle School in the fall. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED No action requested. Item No.: 14 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: Pack 285 – Arrow of Light (AOL) Den Presenter: Correy Farniok Police Chief Agenda Section: Presentation AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. Direct staff to draft a resolution of approval or denial of a proposed Master Development Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat for a proposed 48 unit apartment building. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on May 19, 2021 and considered to be complete on that date. The 60-Day review period has been extended to September 16, 2021. 3. Background. This project was presented to the Council as a sketch plan in April, 2021 (LA20-53). The Council generally supported the project, including the density, hardcover, and flat roof characteristic proposed, but suggested the applicant keep the defined height of the building to 30 feet, maximum. Master Development Plan The project is generally consistent with the presented sketch plan. The three story building will include 48 apartment units (with the potential to convert to condominiums in the future), a community room, exercise room, and a roof top deck. The building will also feature one level of underground parking. Additional improvements include a proposed dog run area on the west side of the parking lot, and a patio in the NE corner of the site. The attached staff report (Exhibit E) to the Planning Commission provides additional analysis of the project. The project plans, building floorplans, and elevations are provided as Exhibits A-C. The proposed building is 30’9” in defined height. The plans reflect a 31’ foot tall building, but that applicant has agreed to reduce the height 1 inch on each floor. Exhibit M illustrates the building height analysis. Zone Change. The project is being developed as a RPUD development. This is consistent with most of the high density developments in Orono. One item of note is the proposed density is 18 units per acre, which is lower that the prescribed density based on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A comp plan amendment has already been initiated to create a new land use classification for the property. Any approval of the project is subject to the Met Council approving the Comp Plan Amendment. Preliminary plat. Due to the existing lot configuration, the property owner proposes re-platting the property into three lots, (day care center, apartment, and common lot). While this activity will result in a new plat, it is not considered a subdivision since the project is not creating new parcels. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On June 21st, the Planning Commission reviewed the project and held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 (Ressler) on a motion to approve the project subject to the 5 staff recommended conditions, and the following three conditions: a. Height no higher than 30 feet b. Relocate the patio from the NE corner of the site c. Provide fencing or similar security to prevent trespassing. 5. Public Comment. Written comments received are provided as Exhibit F. Comments received during the public hearing included concerns related to visual impact and the location of the patio for potential noise and trespassing concerns. Residents of the single family neighborhood to the north also Item No.: 15 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000042 – Mohegan Hansen Arch o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Master Development Plan Approval, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Community Development Report AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A.Carlson Approved By: commented on the traffic impacts and the overall density of the development. Planning Commissions minutes are provided as Exhibit D. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on July 6th. Following that meeting, the applicant agreed to relocate the patio from the NE corner of the site, as illustrated on Exhibit N. This change, and any others directed by the Council should be reflected in revised drawings to be attached to an approval resolution. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council direct staff to draft a resolution of approval for the proposed Master Development Plan, zone change, and preliminary plat, incorporating the following conditions: a. Met Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment that reduces the density below 20- units per acre b. MCWD approval c. City Engineer approval d. Fire Chief approval e. Approval of the final plat and Development Agreement f. Height no higher than 30 feet g. Relocate the patio from the NE corner of the site h. Provide fencing or similar security to prevent trespassing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the approval resolution and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Preliminary Plat B. Site Plan C. Architectural plans D. PC Minutes-draft E. PC Staff report F. Public Comment G. Exterior amenity H. Fire Hose Reach I. Fire Truck turning J. Narrative K. Engineer response letter L. Staff comment letter response M. Building height analysis N. Revised site plan References Case 20-53 file PC Staff report and Exhibits 6-21-21 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 5 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 1 9 : 4 6 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 1 9 7 6 7 B - P r e P L A T OUCKSL QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION EAGLE RIDGE APARTMENTS 2060 WAYZATA BLVD. W. ORONO, MN 55356 CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55330 763-424-5505 1. Prepared May 19, 2021. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 2060 Wayzata Blvd. W., Orono, Minnesota 55356. 3. The bearings for this survey are based on the plat of AMBER WOODS OFICE CENTRE. 4. Benchmark: MnDOT 2713 AG - in Long Lake, in the sidewalk in the NW corner of C.R. 146 Bridge No. 27273 over T.H. 12 and the Railroad, 0.2 , mile south along Brown Road from the junction of T.H. 912 and C.R. 146, 25.0 feet west of C.R. 146, 300.0 feet south of City Hall, 3.0 feet east of the NE corner of the NW pillar with a light pole, 3.0 feet west of a curb, 0.2 Foot north of an expansion joint. Elevation = 997.40 feet (NGVD 29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located approx. 125 feet east of entrance from Wayzata Blvd. W. and 125 feet north of Wayzata Blvd. W., as shown hereon. Elevation = 1011.82 feet (NGVD 29) 5. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0302F, Community Panel No. 270178 0302 F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 6. The field work was completed on March 24, 2021. OWNER/DEVELOPER: CBS MN Properties, LLC PO Box 575 Long Lake, MN 55356 Current Zoning: B-6 PUD (Highway Commercial) Current Building Setbacks:Current Parking Setback: Front 30 feet Front 15 feet West Side 10 feet West Side 5 feet East Side 35 feet East Side 10 feet Rear 35 feet Rear 10 feet Proposed Zoning: RPUD (Residential Planned Unit Development) Proposed Building Setbacks:Proposed Parking Setbacks: Front 30 feet Front 15 feet Side 35 feet Side 5 feet Rear 35 feet Rear 10 feet ZONING INFORMATION Areas: Proposed Lot 1 Area = 6,242 +/- square feet or 0.14 +/- acres Proposed Lot 2 Area = 32,221 +/- square feet or 0.74 +/- acres Proposed Lot 3 Area = 76,300 +/- square feet or 1.75 +/- acres Total Property Area = 114,763 +/- square feet or 2.63 +/- acres SITE DATA SPOT ELEVATION CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE GUY WIRE TREE (GENERAL) DECIDUOUS TREE OVERHEAD UTILITY TOP OF CURB TOP NUT HYDRANT RETAINING WALL SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB CUT MAPPED WATERMAIN POWER POLE SURVEY LEGEND POST INDICATOR VALVE License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS 48988 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19-767B MLS SFM MLS CMS 05/19/21 05/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 OF 1 SITE Council Exhibit A LA21-42 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 6 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 2 8 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 1 - 1 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-1 1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WAS PREPARED FROM AN PARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS & PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION PLANS (AMBER WOODS). UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SUCH AS SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, FORCEMAIN, ETC. WAS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF ORONO RECORD PLANS. 2. WE HAVE SHOWN BURIED STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON AND/OR SERVING THE SITE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS DO NOT CONSISTENTLY RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY AND LOCATION PURPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE UTILITY OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM THE MAIN LINE TO THE CUSTOMER'S STRUCTURE OR FACILITY - THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. IF A PRIVATE SERVICE TO AN ADJOINER'S SITE CROSSES THIS SITE OR A SERVICE TO THIS SITE CROSSES AN ADJOINER, IT MAY NOT BE LOCATED SINCE MOST OPERATORS WILL NOT MARK SUCH "PRIVATE" SERVICES. C. SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS DURING WINTER MONTHS MAY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. D. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FIELD LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR INCONCLUSIVE. MAPS PROVIDED BY UTILITY OPERATORS ARE VERY OFTEN AT A VERY SMALL SCALE, OR NO SCALE. E. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THE SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651-454-0002. F. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, SUCH AS NATURAL GAS, ELECTRIC LINES, TELEPHONE LINES, FIBEROPTIC LINES, CABLE TELEVISION LINES, UNDERGROUND PIPELINES, ETC. WAS SUPPLIED OR LOCATED BY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. EXISTING CONDITIONS GENERAL NOTES SPOT ELEVATION CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE GUY WIRE TREE (GENERAL) DECIDUOUS TREE OVERHEAD UTILITY TOP OF CURB TOP NUT HYDRANT RETAINING WALL SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB CUT MAPPED WATERMAIN POWER POLE SURVEY LEGEND TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Council Exhibit B LA21-42 EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TYPREMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT & VALVE REMOVE PORTION OF RETAINING WALL REMOVE RETAINING WALLS REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE EXISTING WATER & SANI. SERVICE 6" DIP FIRE 1" DOMESTIC COPPER 4" PVC SANI. REMOVE & REPLACE CASTING. SEE UTILITY PLAN REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE EXISTING WATER & SANI. SERVICE 6" DIP FIRE 1" DOMESTIC COPPER 4" PVC SANI. REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE, TYP. REMOVE PARTIALLY BUILT BUILDING REMOVE & SALVAGE EX. LIGHTPOLES, TYP. REMOVE & SALVAGE EX. LIGHTPOLES, TYP. SIGN TO REMAIN & BE ALTERED AS NEEDED N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 3 1 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 1 - 2 D e m o l i t i o n P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DEMOLITION PLAN C1-2 REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING METERS, SIGNS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING DEMOLITION LEGEND: TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3.CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND SWPPP FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4.CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALS ARE TO BE MADE TO A VERTICAL SAW CUT OR TO A NEAT MILLED EDGE. 7.CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER AND OTHER POURED CONCRETE ITEMS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO AN EXISTING EXPANSION OR CONTRACTION JOINT. SAW CUT AS NECESSARY FOR A NEAT EDGE OF REMOVAL. 8.ALL REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN A MANNER MEETING ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL SIGNS, MAILBOXES, ETC. 10.ANY DAMAGE TO ITEMS NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION WITH NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. SITE DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING HCHC EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE 15 10 2 7 11 5 12 EX. RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS MEET & MATCH EX. CURB PROPERTY LINE 1' OUTSIDE PATIOS REINFORCED TURF 45'R 17'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 10'R 3.4'R HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT MEET & MATCH EX. CURB DOG RUN 16.4 14.3 18.0 28.0 22.9 70.2 286.2 164.2 28.0 15'R 5.0 5.0 CONCRETE WALK EX. RETAINING WALL EX. PLAY AREA EX. PLAY AREA DOG WALK EXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLE BLACK WROUGHT IRON FENCE ON TOP OF WALLS SIGN 2.0 OVERHANG N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 0 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 2 - 1 S i t e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS SITE PLAN C2-1 PAVEMENT TYPES CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE & REPLACE PARKING LOT 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CURRENT ZONING: B-6 PUD PROPOSED ZONING:B-6 PUD PROPERTY AREA:2.63 +/- AC DISTURBED AREA:1.62 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.85 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.60 AC TOTAL PARKING: 62 SURFACE STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 66 UNDERGROUND STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 1.MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5.IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6.THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET(S) OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8.ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9.ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. 11.ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 12.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED 11/30/16. 13.SUBGRADE PREPARATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2112. THE TOP 3 FEET SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 14.AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE MNDOT 2211 CLASS 5. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD. 15.PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2360 WITH MIX DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD. 16.CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 200 FEET AT ALL FIXED OBJECTS. CONTRACTIONS JOINTS EVERY 10 FEET. 17.CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2521. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS AT ALL FIVES OBJECTS. CONTRACTION JLINTS EVERY 5 FEET. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7 AM - 7 PM (MONDAY - FRIDAY) AND 9 AM - 7 PM ( SATURDAY.) A 48 HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. SITE NOTES SITE DATA GENERAL NOTES EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x1017.5 x 1017.5 x 1007.5 x1007.5 x x 1009.75 1008.6 x 1018.0 x 1017.5 x x x1000.6x x 1015.5x1010.0 x 1013.5 x1008.4 x 1012.0 x 1010.5 x x 1016.5 xx x1016.5 x1018.0 x 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW x x x1010.05 x 1016.5 x1016.95 x1016.25 x 1017.0x 1017.0 x 1018.25 TW 1018.0 GWx1017.5 x 1016.5 x x 1018.0 x1011.25 x 1016.1 x 1014.1 x 1017.6 x 1018.0 x 1018.2 x 1017.85 x1015.9 x1016.5 x1015.45 x1014.95 x 1016.7 x 1014.1 x1014.2 x1018.0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 x 1016.5 8 8 x 1016.5 8 8 8 8 x1017.0 EOF x1017.0 x1017.85 x 1017.75 x1016.88 TC x 1007.5 x1007.6 x1008.1 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 x 1018.0 TW 1017.1 GW x1016.5 1018.5 TW 1017.1 GW 1017.75 TW 1017.5 GW 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW x 1017.25 TW 1012.0 GW 1017.75 TW 1017.5 GW 1009.5 TW 1001.8 GW 1009.0 TW 1000.6 GW 1009.0 TW 1005.0 GW 1005.0 TW 1000.6 GW 1017.5 TW 1009.5 GW 1010.5 TW 1010.3 GW 1009.25 TW 1009.0 GW 1007.25 TW 1007.0 GW 1017.5 TW 1008.5 GW 1017.25 TW 1017.0 GW 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT GRADE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 3 7 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 1 G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-1 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR SOIL STABILIZATION INFORMATION. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DETAILS SHEETS OF THESE PLANS. ALL CURB SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE-UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF PREMIUM TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO.16.61753.100), DATED 12/08/16 AS PREPARED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 6.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 7.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 8.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 9.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 11.A STREET SWEEPER MUST BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 3 HOURS UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY THAT THE STREETS NEED TO BE SWEPT. 12.THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. 13.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT. THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND TURF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED. 15.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. 16.FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE +/-0.1 FEET TO FINISH GRADES. 17.UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BLOW THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7:00 AM - 10:00 PM, MONDAY - SATURDAY. A 48 HOUR NOTICED IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. 21.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) SHALL BE LANDLOK 450, AS MANUFACTURED BY PROPEX GEOSOLUTIONS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OF THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. 22.STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL, FENCING AND HANDRAIL DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 23.REGIONAL POND AND STORM SEWER EAST OF THE SITE MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK. THE POND BOTTOM MUST BE VERIFIED WITH SURVEY PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND ONCE WORK COMMENCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ANY SEDIMENT ADDED TO THE POND OR SEWER DUE TO SITE CONSTRUCTION. CITY TO BE GIVEN 48 HOURS NOTICE BEFORE REVIEW IS WANTED. 24.RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 INLET PROTECTION TYP INLET PROTECTION TYP INLET PROTECTION TYP SILT FENCE TYP SILT FENCE TYP SILT FENCE TYP ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 5 1 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 2 S W P P P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN BIO ROLLS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE SHEET C3-3 FOR SWPPP NOTES AND C3-4 FOR SWPPP DETAILS. GENERAL NOTES C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 2 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 3 - 3 S W P P N o t e s & D e t a i l s OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES & DETAILS C3-3 1.THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A 48 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED UTILITIES. 2.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP 2.INSTALL SILT FENCE & BIO ROLLS AROUND SITE 3.CLEAR AND GRUB SITE 4.STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 5.REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES 6.CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 7.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES 8.ROUGH GRADE SITE 9.IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND/OR BALANCE AS NEEDED 10.INSTALL UTILITIES 11.INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 12.INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 13.INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS 14.FINAL GRADE SITE 15.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES 16.SEED AND MULCH 17.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND BIO ROLLS AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 3.SITE DATA: AREA OF DISTURBANCE / PROPERTY AREA:2.63 AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.85 AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.60 AC GENERAL SOIL TYPE:SEE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 4.THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5.PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR & INSPECTED BY CITY PRIOR TO ANY WORK. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. 6.ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 7.ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. DENOTES SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ALL 3:1 SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 8.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 9.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 10.SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S. 11.IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN IS TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY PARTIALLY EXCAVATE AND LEAVE THE BASIN 2 FEET ABOVE FINISHED ELEVATION. 12.SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH WDNR DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 13.EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. 14.NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 15.THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.B., PART II.C, PART II.B-F, PART V, PART IV AND APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. 16.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE WDNR. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A.FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT PART IV.G. HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. B.TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. 16. INSPECTIONS A.INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. B.EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. C.STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D.FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. E.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 17. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE A.SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS B.SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C.SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS D.CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 HOURS. E.PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS 18.THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 19.OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. 20.SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. C.THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 21.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA A.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASH-OUT CONTAINER WITH RAIN PROTECTION PER PLAN. B.CONCRETE WASH-OUT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNAGE STATING "CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA DO NOT OVERFILL". C.CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER NEEDS TO BE PUMPED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STANDING WATER IN WASHOUT AREA. 22.IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. 23.PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 24.FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 25.RESPONSIBILITIES A.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A PERSON WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ B.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: CONTACT:__________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ 26.THE MINNESOTA DNR OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS OR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMPS. 27.LIST OF CONTACTS SWPPP NOTES INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT 3 FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) 8" 12" 4" 2" 2 4 FILTER BAG INSERT 1 OVERFLOW HOLES (2" X 4" HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) 1/2 W D W 1/ 2 D INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET 4 NOTES: SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, 3886 & 3891. MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES LISTED ON Mn/DOT'S APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. 1.ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, MEETING SPEC. 3886. 2.FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL. 3.INSTALLATION NOTES: 3.1.DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES, MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. 3.2.THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. 3.3.WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. 4.FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3015 DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF ROCK FILTER LOG LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 0 1,850 0 20 SEEDING AC 1.25± ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CERTIFICATION NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMPAIRED WATER TYPE OF SPECIAL WATER LONG LAKE NO YES RECEIVING WATERS WOLSFLED LAKE NO YES TITLE NAME OWNER DALE RICHARDSON COMPANY PHONE NUMBER PROJECT MANAGER JEFF SHOPEK LOUCKS 763-496-6715 ENGINEER SWPPP VAL ANDERSON 763-496-6728LOUCKS CONTRACTOR SITE MANGER PENDING CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC 612-708-6085 PENDING WOLSFELD WOODS SNA LAKE/OTHER YES NO SCIENTIFIC & NATURAL SITE LONG LAKE RECEIVING WATER WOLSFELD LAKE & WOODS NOT RECEIVING WATERS MERCURY, NUTRIENTS NUTRIENTS 2023 SPECIAL & IMPAIRED WATERS EXISTING BUILDING 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 HCHC 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 HYDRANT W/ GATE VALVE 6" DIP WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" DIP CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 8" DIP CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 8" DIP CORE DRILL SANI. SERVICE INV-1000.78 22 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% SANI. SERVICE INV-1001.00 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN (VERIFY EXISTING SIZE & MATERIAL) CBMH 10 CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP RIM: 1008.5 INV: 1004.1 FES 11 RIM: 1009.0 12' - 12" RCP @ 2.0% CBMH 12 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1008.76 W INV: 1003.92 SW/E 18' - 15" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 13 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1003.04 88' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% 88' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 14 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1002.16 47' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 15 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1001.69 66' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0%CBMH 16 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1001.03 90' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 17 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 1000.13 80' - 18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 18 RIM: 1016.5 INV: 999.33 N INV: 996.41 SE 33' - 18" RCP @ 2.0% CONNECT TO EX. CB INV: 995.75 +/- CBMH 20 RIM: 1015.8 INV: 1006.66 +/-CBMH 21 - SOLID CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1015.2 EX. INV: 1006.48 +/- CBMH 22 - BEEHIVE CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1007.9 EX. INV: 1003.26 +/- CBMH 23 CONSTRUCT OVER EX. 15" RCP RIM: 1007.6 EX. INV: 1002.99 +/- CBMH 24 - SOLID CASTING ADJ. RIM: 1008.1 EX. INV: 1002.41 +/- 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE PIV CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN (VERIFY EXISTING SIZE & MATERIAL) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 6" GATE VALVE 8" GATE VALVE 300' HOSE REACH FOR FIRE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 8 : 2 7 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 4 - 1 U t i l i t y P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS UTILITY PLAN C4-1 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2013 EDITION. 2.ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4.ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 & SCH 40 6" TO 8" DIAMETER STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE 12" TO 15" DIAMETER 9.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a.PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b.PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c.ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d.WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON THE UTILITY PLAN. 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 14.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOIN.T 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO FINISH GRADE. 19.ALL CONNECTIONS TO SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CITY. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOUR PRIOR NOTICE. 20.RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. UTILITY NOTES WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 9 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 8 - 1 D e t a i l S h e e t OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DETAIL SHEET C8-1 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 4 7 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 8 - 1 D e t a i l S h e e t OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 06-14-21 06-14-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS DETAIL SHEET C8-2 EXISTING BUILDING FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 HCHC FFE - 1018.0 GFE-1007.5 10 09 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 16 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 BLS 4 TA 2 BLS 4 TA 2 BLS 4 TA 4 TA 3 BLS 2 BLS 4 TA 4 TA 4 TA 3 BLS 3 BLS 1 SSC 19 RGD 2 IH 7 WC 4 WC 3 WC 7 WC 5 WC 1 SGM 7 BAJ 5 FLM 5 FLM 2 QA 14 FG 30 PPJ 27 NSG 3 BS 10 BLS 10 BLS 10 TGA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 4 BLS 4 TA 1 IH 8 RSD 5 BLS 9 AJS 5 RSD 5 RSD 2 PRC 4 TA 2 AD 4 TA 4 AD 12 SJ 6 AD 5 FLM 6 FG 9 SSD 4 SJ 8 SSD 11 FG 3 BS 1 SSC 1 SSC 1 PRC 3 SSC 3 SSC 2 SGM 1 SGM 4 SGM 3 BO 2 QA 2 AP 3 BO 3 AP 1 AB 1 AB 3 RM 14 RSD DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE AB 2 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze`B & B 2.5"Cal BO 6 BURR OAK Quercus macrocarpa B & B 2.5"Cal IH 3 IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Impcole` TM B & B 2.5"Cal QA 4 QUAKING ASPEN Populus tremuloides 25 gal RM 3 RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum `Franksred` TM B & B 2.5"Cal SGM 9 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen`B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE AP 5 AUSTRIAN PINE FULL FORM Pinus nigra B & B 6` HGT BS 7 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FULL FORM Picea glauca `Densata`B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SIZE PRC 3 PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE Malus x `Prairie Rose`B & B 1.5"Cal SSC 7 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Malus x `Spring Snow`B & B 1.5"Cal SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING AD 12 ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea `Artic Fire`5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. BLS 59 BIRCH-LEAF SPIREA Spirea x betulifolia `Tor`5 gal 24" HGT 36" o.c. RGD 19 RED GNOME DOGWOOD Cornus alba sibirica `Red Gnome`5 gal 24" HGT 60" o.c. GRASSES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING FG 31 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`1 gal 24" o.c. FLM 15 FLAME MISCANTHUS Miscanthus sinensis `Purpurascens`1 gal 48" o.c. NSG 27 NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS Panicum virgatum `North Wind`1 gal 30" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING BAJ 7 BLUE ARROW JUNIPER Juniperus virginiana `Blue Arrow`10 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. PPJ 30 PENCIL POINT JUNIPER Juniperus Communis 'Pencil Point'10 gal 24" o.c. SJ 16 SCANDIA JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Scandia'5 gal 48" o.c. TGA 10 TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn'5 gal 42" o.c. TA 52 TECHNY GLOBE ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis `Techny Globe 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE FIELD3 SPACING AJS 9 AUTUMN JOY SEDUM Sedum x `Autumn Joy`1 gal 18" o.c. DWH 1 DREAM WEAVER HOSTA Hosta `Dream Weaver`1 gal 24" o.c. RSD 32 RUBY STELLA DAYLILY Hemerocallis x `Ruby Stella`1 gal 24" o.c. N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 1 2 : 1 8 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ L 1 - 1 L a n d s c a p e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Gregory A. Johnson - LA Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24610 19767 JAS GAJ GAJ 06-14-21 06-14-21 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1-1 IRRIGATION NOTES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED AND LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. IRRIGATION IS NOT NEEDED IN NATIVE SEEDED AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL NOT SPRAY ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTINGS AND SOD AREAS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED. GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. LANDSCAPE PLAN ROCK MULCH - 1-1/2" GREY TRAP ROCK 4" DEPTH ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUE - $12,000,000 UNIT COSTLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SOD / TOPSOIL - SEE NOTES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE - 2.5" CAL PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE - 3" CAL PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE - 1.5" CAL (2 ORN = 1 CAN) PROPOSED SHRUBS GROUNDCOVER LEGEND PLANT LIST EDGING 27 12 10 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT - 1% OF $12,000,000 = $120,000 PROPOSED PERENNIALS / GRASSES 205 152 PROP EST COST $500 $450 $350 $60 $15 $13,500 $5,400 $3,500 $12,300 $2,280 PROPOSED SOD PROPOSED ROCK MULCH ED G I N G ED G I N G DOG RUN DOG PARK TOTAL LANDSCAPE COST OPINION 1,500 sy $25 $37,500 $3,000 $127,980 $120,000 PROPOSED GRAVEL PAVE $2,500 PROPOSED IRRIGATION $48,000 GRAVEL PAVE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT - 26,396 SF PROPOSEDTREE REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED CANOPY TREE - 2.5" CAL PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE - 3" CAL 27 12 REQUIRED 27 12 EXISTING SIGN 42" ORNAMENTAL FENCE - SEE L2-1 #### #### C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 06 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 1 1 2 : 1 9 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ L A N D S C A P E \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ L 1 - 1 L a n d s c a p e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06-14-21 CITY COMMENTS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Gregory A. Johnson - LA Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24610 19767 JAS GAJ GAJ 06-14-21 06-14-21 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2-1 LOUCKS Deciduous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2x ROOT BALL WIDTH CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) MULCH - 4" DEEP. NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE. SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. CUT BACK WIRE BASKET PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING1 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING LOUCKS Coniferous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. ROOT BALL SET ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. MULCH MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. 2 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. MULCH FOR TURF SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE TYPE 5 WOOD FIBER HYDROMULCH CONFORMING WITH MNDOT 3884. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS WITH SLOPES 15% OR GREATER SHALL BE MNDOT CATEGORY 1, STRAW RD 1S BLANKET CONFORMING WITH MNDOT 3885. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V-CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. COMMERCIAL GRADE 5" BLACK POLY EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH UNIFORM PIECE SIZE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECIEVE 3" OF MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP MULCH WTH A FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. ROCK MULCH SHALL BE 1"-1-1/2" GREY TRAP ROCK, 4" DEEP OVER A FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR. WARRANTY SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. VARIES SEE PLAN EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN MULCH - 3" MIN DEPTH - SEE NOTES LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING 12" DEPTH (MIN) LOAM PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES PERENNIAL PLANTING LOUCKS Perennial Planting.dwgSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" BU I L D I N G W A L L ( T Y P ) 4 REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. MULCH - 3" DEPTH - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING BU I L D I N G W A L L ( T Y P ) SHRUB PLANTING LOUCKS Shrub Planting.dwgSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"3 42" ORNAMENTAL FENCE - DELGARD LOUCKS 42INCH ORN FENCE - DELGARD.dwgSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2" SQUARE FENCE POST 3' - 8 " 6'-3/4" 4" 6" 1' - 6 " 3" MODEL: 42" ELBA RESIDENTIAL FENCE BY DELGARD (OR EQUAL) COLOR: BLACK 1-800-235-0185 WWW.DELGARD.COM 1" X 1" TOP AND MID RAIL 5/8" X 5/8" PICKET 1" X 1" BOTTOM RAIL GRADE EXISTING SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTING 5 SITE LOCATION AREA MAP CIVIL LOUCKS INC 7200 HEMLOCK LANE, SUITE 300, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 JEFF SHOPEK - PRINCIPAL 763-496-6715 JSHOPEK@LOUCKSINC.COM ARCHITECTURE/ INTERIOR DESIGN MOHAGEN HANSEN ARCHITECTURE | INTERIORS 1000 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200 WAYZATA, MN 55391 JENNIFER KAPLAN, AIA - PROJECT MANAGER 952-426-7421 JKAPLAN@MOHAGENHANSEN.COM PROJECT CONTACTS 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391 T: 952-426-7400 F: 952-426-7440 PR O J E C T CL I E N T PR O J E C T A D D R E S S DA T E PR O J E C T P H A S E PR O J . N O . MohagenHansen.com CB S - M N P R O P E R T I E S , L L C / 2 1 0 1 1 / C I T Y S U B M I T T A L / E A G L E R I D G E M U L T I - F A M I L Y CBS-MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575, LONG LAKE, MN 55356 EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY 05-19-2021 21011 CITY SUBMITTAL 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 NEW CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION 18074 TODD MOHAGEN, AIA, NCARB I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. REGISTRATION NUMBER: I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHARGED. CLIENT APPROVAL TITLE: AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF: Council Exhibit C LA21-42 UP DN UP A3001 A300 4 3'-4"20'-0" A300 5 18 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 3'-7 3/4"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0" 14 28 20 2 2 1 2 3 4 A300 2 UTLITY LOBBY ELEV. EQUIP STAIR 2 TRASH PARKING 66 STALLS STAIR 1 COMMUNITY SPACE: BIKES 441 SF DRIVE THRU DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N AR C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r _ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A200 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. 1/8" = 1'-0"A200 1 LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN UP DN UP A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 STAIR 1 UTILITY MAIL ROOM WC OFFICE VEST. 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 3 BED COMMUNITY SPACE: EXERCISE 930 SF STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED GARBAGE LOBBY DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A201 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 1 LEVEL 1 - FLOOR PLAN N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN UP UPDN A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 UTILITY WC 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 3 BED STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED GARBAGE STAIR 1 2 BED COMMUNITY: SITTING 243 SF CO M M U N I T Y SP A C E : B I K E S 18 7 S F DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A202 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/8" = 1'-0"A202 1 LEVEL 2 - FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 DN DN DN A3001 A300 4 A300 5 A300 2 2 BED 2 BED STORAGE/ UTILITY/ AMENITY 2 BED 2 BED STAIR 1 2 BED UTILITY WC 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED STAIR 2 GARBAGE WC COMMUNITYSPACE: COMMUNITY ROOM 921 SF COMMUNITY SPACE: AMENITY DECK 745 SF ROOF COMMUNITY: SITTING 243 SF DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A203 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/8" = 1'-0"A203 1 LEVEL 3 - FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES TAG KEYNOTE 1 AREA WELL FOR AIR EXHAUST WITH METAL GRATE COVER. 2 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ELEVATOR PIT. 3 EXHAUST FAN AND LOUVER GRILL. 4 AREA WELL FOR INTAKE LOUVER GRILL. N TRUE NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 W/D W/D W/ D W/D 30 ' - 7 3 / 4 " CL CL 26'-6" KITCHEN LAUNDRY CLOSET BATHROOM WALK-IN CLOSET BEDROOM LIVING 1 BEDROOM 797 S.F. OUTDOOR DECK HVAC ENTRY DINING KITCHEN DINING LIVING HVAC BEDROOM CLOSET LAUNDRY CLOSET BATHROOM ENTRY WALK-IN CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM OUTDOOR DECK CL CL 49'-6" 28 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 2 BEDROOM 1,397 S.F. 3 BEDROOM 1,781 S.F. CLOSET CLOSET LAUNDRY ENTRY KITCHEN WALK-IN CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH LIVING DINING CLOSET BEDROOM BATH BATH BEDROOM 27'-7 3/4" 67 ' - 3 1 / 2 " MASTER BEDROOM WALK-IN CLOST MASTER BATHROOM HALF BATH DEN LIVING DINING KITCHEN ENTRYCLOSET BATHROOM WALK-IN CLOSET LAUNDRY BDEROOM HVAC OUTDOOR DECK 2 BEDROOM LARGE 1,937 S.F. CLCL 68'-4 3/4" 28 ' - 7 3 / 4 " N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ s h a y e s @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A400 UNIT PLANS Checker Author 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 1 TYPICAL 1 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 2 TYPICAL 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 3 TYPICAL 3 BEDROOM UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 4 TYPICAL 2 BEDROOM LARGE UNIT 26 UNITS 14 UNITS 6 UNITS 2 UNITS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE BRK-1 BRICK: STANDARD MODULAR COLOR: RED/BROWN EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND MTL-1 METAL PRE-FINISHED COPING AND TRIM: FIRESTONE UNICLAD COLOR: DARK BRONZE MTL-2 METAL RIBBED PANEL - FIRESTONE DELTA COLOR: DARK BRONZE MTL-3 METAL PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM PERGOLA FRAME AND LOUVERS: COLOR: DARK BRONZE 1. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES/ MULLIONS: DARK BRONZE 2. VENTING/ LOUVERS: DARK BRONZE 3. BALCONY METAL: DARK BRONZE, BALCONY METAL RAILING: DARK BRONZE, BALCONY RAILING SCREEN: CLEAR GLAZING 4. METAL PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES: DARK BRONZE 5. ALUMINUM PERGOLA: MTL-3 6. ARCHITECT TO BE PROVIDED WITH ALL SAMPLES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION TO REVIEW AND APPROVE. CSTN-1 CAST STONE: STONEWORKS COLOR: BUFF LIMESTONE ACM-1 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL: ALUCOBOND COLOR: DARK BRONZE LOWER LEVEL 89' - 4" B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 MTL-1 MTL-3 CSTN-1 MTL-2 PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER ACM-1 DECORATIVE BACKLIT METAL SIGNAGE: NATURAL LIGHT BRONZE DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES PERGOLA B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER LOWER LEVEL 89' - 4" B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-B 132' - 4" BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER PERGOLA DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES MTL-3 GRADE BEYOND B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-B 132' - 4" BRK-1 MTL-1 CSTN-1 ACM-1PIN LETTER SIGNAGE: DARK BRONZE 3 A300 4A300 5 A300 1 A300 2 A300 B.O. DECK 128' - 6" LEVEL 1 - FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. STRUCTURE-A 130' - 4" LEVEL 2 - FLOOR 109' - 6" LEVEL 3 - FLOOR 119' - 0" BALCONY VENTING/ LOUVER PERGOLA MTL-3 BRK-1 MTL-1 MTL-2 CSTN-1 ACM-1 DECORATIVE PRE-FINISHED PLANTER BOXES MTL-2 BRK-1 CSTN-1 MTL-3 ACM-1 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS S.PAETZEL Author 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 1 ELEVATION - SOUTH 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 3 ELEVATION - NORTH 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 4 ELEVATION - WEST 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 5 ELEVATION - EAST 2 1" = 40'-0"A300 6 KEYPLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A300 2 ELEVATION - EAST NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 N DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Suite 200 Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952-426-7400 Fax 952-426-7440 DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N PH A S E IS S U E R E C O R D RE G I S T R A T I O N A R C H I T E C T PR O J E C T N A M E COMPUTER DIRECTORY: SH E E T D E S C R I P T I O N THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NOT F O R C O N S T RU C T IO N C: \ R e v i t P r o j e c t s \ 2 1 0 1 1 _ E a g l e R i d g e M u l t i F a m i l y _ M a s t e r_ j j o h n s o n @ m o h a g e n h a n s e n . c o m . r v t A300A RENDERINGS S.PAETZEL J.JOHNSON 05-19-2021 21011 EagleRidge-MultiFamily_21011 CITY SUBMITTAL EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION 2060 WAYZATA BLVD ORONO, MN 55356 12" = 1'-0"A300A 1 RENDERING - ENTRY 12" = 1'-0"A300A 2 RENDERING - DRIVE UP NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CITY SUBMITTAL 05-19-2021 Page M of 1Project #:Date:6/10/2021Calculated light levels shown are estimates based on information available at time of layout request.Due to unknown site conditions JTH Lighting assumes no responsibility for installed light levels.1. Lighting Reflectance of 80/50/20 used unless no ted otherwise 2. Interior calc points shown at 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise 3. Exterior calc points shown at grade unless note d otherwise 4. Emergency egress calc points shown at 0" A.F.F.5. Photometric drawings are for Design purposes on ly, not for Construction documentsPaper Size: ARCH D - 24X36"MN, ND, SD, W. WI 6885 146TH ST W APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 952.223.6300 WWW.JTHLIGHTING.COM EAGLE RIDGE Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l Ca l c T y p e Un i t s Av g Ma x Mi n Av g / M i n Ma x / M i n LO T _ P l a n a r Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 1. 4 3 6. 4 0. 0 N. A . Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ma n u f a c t u r e r De s c r i p t i o n Ar r a n g e m e n t Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts LLF N. A . 2 AA AS L 1 - 1 6 0 L - 1 0 0 - 4 K 7 - 3 - U SI N G L E 12010 87.6 0.950 6 AA 2 AS L 2 - 3 2 0 L - 1 4 5 - 4 K 7 - 3 - U SI N G L E 20738 143 0.950 E L E E L E T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E L T E LTEL T E L T E L TE L TE L TEL T E L T E L O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O u t l o t D S U G A R S A N M H R I M =1 0 0 1 .3 T O P =1 0 0 2 .9 O H O H (D I R C E T I O N A N D I N V E R T A R E U N K N O W N ) O u t l o t D EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G 1012 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 6 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 6 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 21010 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 6 101610141016101210101008 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 4 GF E - 1 0 0 7 . 5 FF E - 1 0 1 8 . 0 HC HC GF E - 1 0 0 7 . 5 FF E - 1 0 1 8 . 0 AA MH : 1 8 AA MH : 1 8 MH : 2 8 AA 2 AA 2 MH : 2 8 AA 2 MH : 2 8 MH : 2 8 AA 2 AA 2 MH : 2 8 AA 2 MH : 2 8 0. 3 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 5 2 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1 . 9 0.0 0. 6 0. 2 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 1 . 5 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 4. 1 1. 2 0. 7 0.0 1. 4 2 . 1 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 5 0. 1 0. 5 0. 1 1. 4 2 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 3 4 . 3 2 . 1 0 . 7 0.0 0. 4 3. 3 0. 2 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 9 4 . 1 0.0 3. 7 2. 7 3. 0 2 . 0 0 . 3 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 4. 2 0. 5 0.0 1. 9 2 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 2 1. 1 0. 7 2. 0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 0 4 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 3 0. 1 0. 7 0.0 2. 8 2 . 5 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0.0 0.0 3. 1 0.0 1. 7 2 . 6 4 . 0 4 . 1 3 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 8 0. 1 3. 8 0. 2 0. 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 3 4 . 7 2. 7 4. 4 2. 7 3. 2 2 . 7 2 . 7 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 5 2. 6 4. 8 4. 2 1. 9 1. 7 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 7 2 . 6 3 . 5 4 . 1 3. 0 4. 1 3. 5 4. 1 3 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 4. 3 4. 3 0. 7 0.0 3. 0 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 5 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 2 2. 3 1. 1 2. 3 0. 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 5 2 . 2 3 . 5 1. 6 1. 7 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0.0 0. 0 2. 8 3 . 1 2 . 9 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 5 2 . 0 0 . 5 0 . 2 2. 8 0.0 0. 0 2. 9 3 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 6 2 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0.0 2. 1 3 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 2 1 . 1 0. 1 0. 1 0.0 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 6 0. 0 0. 0 3. 6 4 . 1 4 . 8 4 . 5 2 . 0 0 . 6 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 1 0. 0 2. 4 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 9 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 7 4 . 5 4 . 4 0. 0 3. 9 3. 9 3 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 4 0. 1 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 8 3. 9 4. 2 3. 8 4. 1 4 . 7 4 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 4. 2 0. 0 2. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 7 0. 0 1. 6 2. 7 0. 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 8 2. 8 3 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 6 4 . 5 4 . 5 2 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 2 0.0 3. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 3. 3 0. 1 2. 3 1 . 5 0 . 8 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.0 2. 4 0.0 1. 3 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0 . 0 2. 7 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 3 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 3. 4 4 . 8 4 . 5 3 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 5 0 . 1 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 4. 6 5 . 9 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 5 1 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 4 3 . 5 3 . 2 2 . 5 1 . 6 0 . 8 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 2. 7 3 . 9 3 . 7 2 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 4 3. 4 0. 4 0.0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 0 0.0 0. 6 0. 6 0 . 9 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0. 0 0. 5 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 7 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 2. 4 2 . 8 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 1 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 9 5. 2 0. 1 0. 9 2. 8 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 1 . 6 2 . 0 0.0 1. 4 0. 0 0. 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 9 1. 0 4. 6 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 6 5. 0 1. 5 3. 9 0. 6 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 8 2 . 9 4 . 2 0.0 2. 1 1. 0 2. 5 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 2 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 5. 4 0.0 5. 0 2. 0 3 . 0 3 . 7 4 . 0 3 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 9 4. 6 0.0 5. 0 2. 2 3 . 5 4 . 9 5 . 2 5 . 0 4 . 5 3 . 9 3 . 4 3 . 5 4. 8 4. 6 0.0 5. 1 4 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 1 3 . 0 3 . 1 3 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 2 3. 9 3. 5 3. 8 3 . 4 3 . 5 4 . 0 4 . 9 5 . 8 6 . 0 5 . 4 4 . 4 3 . 7 0.0 3. 3 0.0 3. 6 3 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 9 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 3. 3 2. 0 2. 3 1 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 4 3 . 7 2. 1 3. 0 4. 5 1. 1 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 3 3 . 4 2 . 7 3. 9 5. 3 6. 4 5 . 6 4 . 0 2 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 5 5. 7 4. 6 3. 9 2 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 3. 2 0. 4 4. 5 0.0 1. 8 0.0 2. 8 3 . 4 3 . 1 2 . 3 1 . 5 0 . 9 0 . 4 0 . 1 0.00.0 0. 1 2. 5 2 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 1 1 . 3 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0. 1 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 1 3 . 2 3 . 3 2 . 6 1 . 7 0.0 0. 4 1. 0 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2. 5 3 . 4 3 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 4 0. 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 6 2. LA21-000042 MOHEGAN HANSEN ARCH O/B/O CBS MN PROPERTIES, 2060 WAYZATA BLVD WEST, SITE PLAN, ZONING CHANGE, PLAT Todd Mohegan, Applicant, was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 2 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). Barnhart stated the Applicant is requesting approval for Master Development Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat approval for a proposed 48 unit market rate apartment building. The building is three stories, plus one level of underground parking. The units themselves are a mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments, with balconies. The L shaped building exterior will feature brick, limestone, and cement panels on all four sides. There is private recreational space throughout the building to conform with the PUD zoning district. The project includes a rooftop deck and a patio on the northeast corner of the site. Exercise and community rooms are also proposed. The building height is proposed at 30 feet 9 inches - which is 9 inches taller than the City’s 30 foot standard - so Planning Commission is asked to comment on that. The density of the project is 18.23 units/acre which is lower than the guidance for this property; it was guided in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan at 20-25 units/acre. Staff has been directed by the City Council to initiate an amendment to the Comp Plan to lower the density. He walked the Commission through setback analysis and noted Staff recommends approval subject to the five conditions outlined in the Staff Report: 1.) Met Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment that reduces the density below 20- units per acre, 2.) Watershed District approval, 3.) City Engineer approval, 4.) Fire Chief approval, 5.) Approval of the final plat and Development Agreement. Gettman asked about the height of the building and taking off 1 inch per floor rather than 4 inches per floor to get down to the 30 feet. Barnhart stated the City has the authority to approve a building taller than 30 feet that is part of the R- PUD zoning district and it is really the Planning Commission’s feedback on whether the 3 inch drop is enough of a concession to address the Council’s concerns. He noted part of the challenge is the highest adjacent grade is at the northwest corner of the building and there is underground parking at the south corner of the building so there is quite a bit of elevation change within the site. The 30 foot limit is a long- standing practice by the City and he believes it originated in trying to keep buildings below the tree canopy. Erickson asked how the height of this project compares with the senior housing project on Kelley Parkway. Barnhart believes the senior housing project on Kelley Parkway is at 30 feet and the senior housing project east of this project is higher than 30 feet. The City has only approved 2 buildings higher than 30 feet. Peterson noted a letter from one of the neighbors objecting to a change in the zoning. Barnhart learned that just before the meeting and did not receive a copy of that. He is not surprised that some may object to the rezoning as it is proposed to be rezoned to the R-PUD district which would allow higher density development. Ressler said right now it is guided for more density than is applied. He clarified every City in the area has to obey the Met Council’s demands for more density and many cities need to find ways to meet those Council Exhibit D LA21-42 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 6 density requirements. The City of Orono has done the best they can to maintain the character of the City but when they have these density requirements they run out of areas where they can do developments like these. He asked what part of the building, or if it is the entire building, that is above the 30 foot height. Barnhart replied 30 feet 9 inches is the defined height which looks at the highest adjacent grade (1,018 feet on this property) and then identify the lowest floor of the building and add 10 feet. So whichever is lowest is what they pick. The lowest floor of this building is the garage, so that is the starting point and then they measure to the top of the flat roof of the building. Todd Mohegan, Mohegan Architectural Group, 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Wayzata, is the architect for the project. He noted regarding the height there was a lot of discussion in the Planning Commission and the City Council and the Applicant was making efforts to get to the height that Council was okay with. Ressler asked if this project is able to be constructed and still map out at 30 feet. Mr. Mohegan replied it is always a possibility but it reduces the livability of the space. Libby asked the ceiling heights in the interior units. Mr. Mohegan answered they will be around 8 feet 6 inches, 8 foot 9 inches. Libby asked if there is nothing from an architectural design standpoint that could remedy the 9 inches over the 30 foot standard. Mr. Mohegan said with difficulty; it is all about running ductwork, electrical, and those things and 8 feet 9 inches is seen as a minimum for people. The lower the ceiling gets the less desirable it is. Gettman clarified they could have an 8 foot space and then have the mechanicals above that, and asked if that is correct. Mr. Mohegan replied one could. Vice Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:31 p.m. Michael Ricks, 2108 Sugarwood Drive, would be directly north and adjacent to the building. Regarding the 30 foot building height, he asked if that is 30 feet above the parking lot or the lowest grade of where the property is cut out. Barnhart replied looking at the north elevation and starting at the level 1 floor, the top of the structure is 30 feet 4 inches. Mr. Ricks said today they look at an eyesore as it has been for a dozen years and was a failed project involving fraud. To get something in there would be understandable and probably better than looking at a dilapidated foundation. He noted there are obviously some concerns and height has been an issue. Regarding trees, there is a boulder wall on the north and east side of the property with a small berm on topo and asked if that is where the trees will go. He planted pine trees on Sugarwood to provide screening MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 6 and if they put another 15-20 deciduous trees, eventually they will shade and destroy the coniferous trees that are there now. Barnhart replied the landscaping is being proposed to go over on the north side. Mr. Ricks said if it is done well and is not intrusive to the existing plant situation but it needs to be compatible with what is already there. He noted the top of the boulder wall has also been an eyesore and he has spent days pulling noxious weeds out, he has called the City, and to get something to remedy it but not be intrusive would be helpful. He asked about a rooftop deck on the north side of the property and asked if that is a community-type deck. Barnhart replied the patio is on the northeast corner which would be a community patio. The rooftop deck is on the south. Mr. Ricks stated he lives in a small community of 25 houses or so, and have zero issues with crime or trespassing, and now they will have 100 people right next to them. He is sure the intention is to have first- class people but it will be high density. One concern is keeping people out of the woods and keeping them safe and out of his backyard and his neighbor’s backyard. He asked if this property will allow Section 8 housing. Barnhart noted they are not proposing that, but are proposing market rate. Angela Mahoney, 2107 Sugarwood Drive, asked the Commission what joint efforts they have done with the City of Long Lake to plan for the traffic needs in the area because of this complex and other projects happening in Long Lake. Ressler stated when they go through a Comprehensive Plan they must figure out where they will put things and part of that is density and how it is zoned and guided. It is a pretty thoughtful process and there is lots of community input. For roads that are the responsibility of the City, there are traffic studies done. He does not know if that particular section of Wayzata Boulevard is the jurisdiction of the City or the County. If a property is guided for a certain density the City must allow it to be developed but must also take into consideration how they will manage the traffic for that. Ms. Mahoney asked who is responsible for Brown Road. Ressler replied that is a City road. Barnhart noted Wayzata Boulevard is a County road. He clarified they have not collaborated with Long Lake on these projects specifically, but when they do the Comprehensive Plan they work closely with Long Lake to make sure they receive an opportunity to comment and see what is coming. It is the same with MnDot and Hennepin County. He noted the timing may be a surprise, but what is happening is not a surprise to those agencies. Ms. Mahoney noted Brown Road is not in good condition so if they are going to add more traffic to it, it will just break down that much faster. She also has security concerns about an apartment complex being that close and Mr. Ricks’ comment about the woods is very valid as there are pools in the neighborhood and it could be a drowning concern. She does not like the location of the patio as she thinks it will be a party scene, it will be loud, and will destroy the peace and sanctity of the neighborhood. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 6 Ressler noted the comments are appreciated and the Planning Commission and the City Council take into consideration in their guidance. It is also nice to have the developer here to take those things into consideration, as well. Ms. Mahoney is also concerned about who would find this location attractive given that it overlooks the existing business which is not aesthetically pleasing in any way. George Mileusnic, 2110 Sugarwood Drive, also wants to share his concern about the patio, the noise level, and how close it is to his deck. He does not know if there is another location to put it as a gathering spot. His is also curious about fire access on the north side, what that would look like, and how far back that would require excavating and understanding how much that may encroach on the properties behind it, as well. Barnhart said the Fire Chief has advised that he has to be able to touch every point of the building with a 300 foot hose. It is not necessarily a road. Barnhart noted the Fire Chief seemed to be generally okay with this but they do not expect to see fire roads. Karl Berg, 2112 Sugarwood Drive, said the comments made about it being a nice place to live and viable community are all very applicable. He noted the senior housing development is behind his house and in the wintertime when leaves are off the trees it is like staring at a battleship in the backyard. He suspects they will have a hard time selling their house because of the development that is there. It’s a little better in the summertime because of leaves on the trees, although air conditioners are noisy in the summer. He thinks it is a hardship for everyone that lives on the south side of Sugar Woods and to see this come in now is a huge disappointment. He said it sounds like there has been some good thought and consideration given to the project which he appreciates. He asked if they are at about 20,000 cars per day on that road. Barnhart does not know what that traffic is. Mr. Berg thinks that should be done before they do this project because they are seeing a tremendous increase in traffic at his medical building on the same street. Adding 40 more units there and with the other developments in the area, he does not think they can really predict what will happen when people get off that bypass and start coming into town through his community there. He thinks the City will have their hands full in managing that. He noted the majority of the development is right in the Ricks’ backyard and he hopes the Commissioners will listen to the concerns of the residents and good choices will be made. Chris Case, 2100 Sugarwood Drive, noted the development has been there since about 1991 and he is here in support of everything that has been said by the other neighbors. He would ask the Commission to consider that the reason he and many of his neighbors live in Orono is because of the low density and green space in the community. Orono has kind of been defined as single family homes with large lots. He knows there are Met Council requirements on density and Mr. Case respectfully requests that the Commission re-look at this site as the appropriate place to meet those requirements, to step back and look at the families that have invested in this community and if there is a way to move those dense developments closer to other dense developments or other green space in the community rather than immediately adjacent to single family homes. Before retirement, Mr. Case was director of real estate for Target, so he has looked at sites for viability. From a residential standpoint, he is concerned about the long-term viability of what market rents will mean to that site. Because the site will look directly out at semi-trucks, gas pumps, and an industrial site, those rates may decline quickly if they struggle in leasing MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 6 the site. The lower the rents, the developer will get stressed, and he asked what will end up happening to this property in the long-term. Vice Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. Ressler remembers in the previous discussion of this application a request to reduce the height which they have done. He reminded the Commission that the roof would be higher if the style were gabled or peaked rather than flat; in theory, one observation is that the overall height of the structure could be higher based on how they measure it. Peterson shared he has always enjoyed the bigger lots in Orono and being spread out compared to the density they are talking about. He just hopes they are not trying to compete with Wayzata on structures like this. Erickson noted the first speaker mentioned the issue of safety as it might relate to residents wandering into his backyard. It raises the question of some type of barrier fencing along the boundary between Sugar Woods and the project. Ressler asked the Applicant if they would be open to that. Dale Richardson, owner of the property at 1260 Wayzata Boulevard, noted there is currently a wrought iron fence on the north portion, but not quite the entire portion. He said they had discussions about wrapping it around because the boulder wall is not going to be that tall as they are filling in the lower level where the garage is. He stated it would be very easy to fence that and noted it will be a higher-end project and will have an expensive market rate. He spoke with the new owners of Orono Station and Orono Station West and they plan to have the trucks out of that property by the time this project is complete, and they are working on drawings for a building on that site. He clarified they are happy to work with residents on landscape. It will be a very secure building, it will not be cheap to live there, and they have had a lot of feedback from current residents. Mr. Richardson stated they envision it to be more of a “snow bird” type of place. Libby is grateful to the citizens who feel comfortable enough to come in and utilize this forum. He reminded them that the Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council and noted some of the concerns brought up are new and may take some time. Gettman reiterated regarding the landscaping, he is not wedded to the idea of having the patio in the back as it is too conducive to having people migrate up the hill. He then looks to the dog run and wonders if there is a way to partition that off and have the green space in between the two. He remembers talking about if there are children in the area, how to keep them away from the road, as well. He thinks they need something else other than a low wrought iron fence for safety and privacy. Gettman is still stuck on the height issue and appreciates that the architect has come up with the 8 feet 6 or 8 feet 9 and Gettman wishes he had the height in his own house. He noted 8 feet is the norm as far as older homes and he is not sure he understands why they have to go over that, especially when trying to protect inches; he noted when they go horizontal the City is extremely vehement about not going an inch to the right or left and protecting the lake, the view, and adjacent property owners. However when they talk vertical they seem to be willing to throw away the inches and he is not buying that they must have 8 feet 6, 8 feet 9 as opposed to cutting it down to all 8 feet 6 to get them down to the 30 feet. Finally with traffic, this particular project is part of a Comprehensive Plan which defines what the Met Council wants which is high density. He MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, June 21, 2021 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 noted the Applicant is coming in at lower density and thinks everyone needs to understand that this is meant for high density. He noted they cannot just pick it out and put it somewhere else. Ressler clarified his opinions and believes condensing the height of the roof is a mitigant which makes him comfortable going to 30 feet 9 inches. Reducing the density from what is guided to what is proposed certainly helps and is hopefully helpful for the general public, as well. Another mitigant for exceeding the 30 feet height makes it a more desirable building with more desirable tenants and perhaps better neighbors. Ressler stated they have had proposed developments that have gone through sketch plans west of this location in the past and that road will get busier which is something they will all have to adapt to. Traffic counts are worth noting and he thinks those will be monitored as they see development go through. He noted they have a shortage of housing in the community for those who want to live in Orono so this gives some opportunities for families to get into the community they all appreciate. He is for this project, he thinks it is tasteful, and thinks the comments that have been made by the developer seem to be that they want to appease the neighbors, be peaceful, and keep everyone happy. Libby asked to clarify the primary focus and intent of the Applicant’s need at this point. Barnhart stated the Applicant has applied for Master Development Plan approval, a zone change to the R- PUD zoning district, and a preliminary plat. Libby asked if the zoning change is still within the guided spirit of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Barnhart clarified the property is guided for high density residential which is 20-25 units/acre. He noted they do not have a zoning district, other than the R-PUD district, that allows an apartment building at that density. They do have the R-PUD zoning district that allows them to zone the property based on a project they find acceptable for that given area. The Comp Plan guides this for 20-25 units/acre and this project is 18 units/acre, so per the Met Council, Barnhart needs to amend the Comp Plan to allow that lower density which is what they have initiated already. Ressler asked if anyone has an opinion on the patio location. Gettman does not support the location of the patio as proposed. Barnhart noted the Commission could approve or deny and then recommend the Applicant address the height issue, the patio, and the fencing/security issue. Gettman moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA21-000042, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Site Plan, Zoning Change, Plat as applied with the 5 Staff Conditions/Recommendations and the 3 additional criteria of the 30 foot maximum height, the adjustment to the fence, and the movement of the patio. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1 (Ressler). Barnhart noted this item will be reviewed by the City Council on July 12, 2021. Date Application Received: May 19, 2021 Date Application Considered as Complete: May 19, 2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: July 18, 2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP, Community Development Director Date: June 21, 2021 Subject: #LA21-42, Mohegan Hansen Arch o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Master Development Plan Approval, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Background The project was presented as a sketch plan (LA20-53) in March and April of this year. This formal submittal is generally consistent with that submittal. The subject property was/ is the site of the proposed Amber Woods Office Center in 2007. Only one building of that project was built. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guided this property as High Density Residential, from the Office use previously. Proposal The applicant proposes a 48 unit market rate apartment building. The building is three stories, plus one level of underground parking. The units themselves are a mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments, with balconies. Each unit is shown with laundry facilities. There are community spaces throughout the building, most notably a community room and adjacent rooftop deck on the south end of the building, on the third floor. The L shaped building exterior will feature brick, limestone, and metal panels on all four Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval for Master Development Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary Plat approval for a proposed 48 unit market rate apartment building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the Master Development Plan, Preliminary Plat, and zone change to RPUD subject to: 1.Met Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment that reduces the density below 20- units per acre 2. MCWD approval 3. City Engineer approval 4. Fire Chief approval 5. Approval of the final plat and Development Agreement Council Exhibit E LA21-42 FILE #LA21-42 June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 5 elevations. The applicant has indicated there will be no roof mounted mechanical units (Heat/ Ventilation/ Conditioning). Any such units will need to be screened from view. Site Improvements. Site improvements include a dog run located west of the existing parking lot, a trail terminating in an outdoor patio in the NE corner of the site, and a large concrete patio type area in the front of the building. Portion of this area will be covered with reinforced turf, to accommodate fire apparatus turning movements. Staff has suggested that a connection to the public trail along Wayzata Blvd be added. Parking. City Code requires 2 parking spaces per unit. Under-ground, there are 66 spaces, and on the surface, to the west of the building, are 55 spaces, totaling 121 spaces. Adjacent to the building is an existing day care center. This day care center will remain, and require 15 stalls. Total parking provided on site is 121 spaces, exceeding the 111 spaces required. The underground spaces are dimensioned as 9 feet by 18 feet, with a 2 foot overhang. The code requires 9 x 20 foot spaces. Access. Access to the site is via a shared driveway off of Wayzata Blvd at the SE corner of the project. There is future potential for this frontage type drive to connect to the commercial businesses to the west, including Orono Station. Cross access easement are recommended. Utilities. The site will be served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. Stormwater will be collected at a number of catchbasins in the parking lot and along the rear of the building and diverted to an existing stormwater pond at the NW corner of Brown and Wayzata Blvd. Plat. The plat proposes to replat the existing property, which now includes 5 office pads, and common area into two building sites (one for the day care center) and a common lot. Because no new lots are created, there is no subdivision proposed. Signage. The building plans show building signs on the south side of the building, one facing Wayzata Blvd, and a second above the entrance. Additionally, the applicant has indicated a desire to upgrade the existing freestanding sign south of the drive. 10% Private recreational. RPUD standards require 10% of the gross land area to be dedicated for private recreational space. These spaces are often tailored to the eventual users of the property, and has varied from trails and gazebos, to recreation rooms and tot lots. The applicant proposes 3500 sq ft of indoor amenities, and 2800 sq ft in exterior amenities: Private Recreation area Bike Storage 441 sq ft Excersize Room 930 sq ft Sitting area (second floor) 243 sq ft Sitting area (third floor) 243 sq ft Community Room 921 sq ft Roof top Deck 745 sq ft Dog Run 2100 sq ft Patio 706 sq ft FILE #LA21-42 June 21, 2021 Page 3 of 5 Trails 440 feet 6329 sqft 10% of the gross area is 10,800 sq ft. The plans (Exhibit E) shows the applicants proposed amenity, which includes virtually all of the green space on the north and east sides of the building. The Commission should comment on this space as meeting the private recreation requirement. Applicable Regulations: Division 10 of the Orono Zoning Code-RPUD regulation (Exhibit K) Analysis: Building Height. Building Height is limited to 30 feet, though the Council has the discretion to approve a building higher than 30 feet. The Building Height Analysis (Exhibit L) shows the building at 31’-0”. The applicant has proposed to lower the ceilings of each of the floor 1 inch, bringing the building to 30’ 9”, though the plans have not been revised. RPUD zoning establishes a number of conditions and/or criteria. Staffs analysis of these conditions is summarized in the following table. Section Standard Conforming? 1 (1) Minimum area: 5 acres or certain exceptions… The property to be platted is 2.48 acres. The Council may find that the project conforms to the exception under C: The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. 2 Uses. Multifamily residential uses are permitted. 3 Sewer availability Yes. 4 Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property high density residential, 20-25 units per acre. Including the day care center, density comes in at 18.23 units per acre, (48 units over 2.63 acres) which is lower than the 20 units per acre required by the Comprehensive Plan. A Comprehensive Plan amendment will be required. 5 Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. None requested. 6 Floor Ratio, up to 1.0 Calculated at 0.69 (79,125 sq ft of floor area/ 114,562 sq ft of gross land). FILE #LA21-42 June 21, 2021 Page 4 of 5 7a Setbacks. Setbacks are 50’ to Wayzata Blvd, 35’ to the rear and the side. Drive lanes 20’ from exterior property lines. The plans reflect a setback of 82 feet from the front property line, 36 feet from the side, and 35 feet from the rear property line. It should be noted that these setbacks are measured from the district boundary, the building itself will be developed on its own lot, established just outside the building footprint. 7b Height, stories, roof style Non-Conforming. The ordinance requires a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof, the proposal is for a flat roof. The Council did not have a concern with the flat roof proposed at sketch plan. As noted above, the height of the building is 30’ 9 inches. The Council may approve a deviation from the height for projects in the RPUD zoning district, but is not obligated to. 7c Outside storage No. None proposed. 11 10% Private Recreational Area (Active and/or Passive) The floor plans show areas labeled “amenity” on the 2nd and 3rd floor, and a 750 sq ft amenity deck on the third floor. 10 percent of the project is 10,800 sq ft. 12 Common Ownership Conforming. Association documents required. 13 Signage Signage located, details not yet developed. 14 Landscaping Landscaping plans provided, appear to be conforming. 15 Architectural Standards Elevations provided. 16 Flexibility from standards Requested: Height. 17 Traffic Studies Not suggested. 18 Building Permits Expected. 19 General regulations applicability Expected. 20 Lighting Lighting plans provided. 21 Trails Sidewalks and public walks proposed. Comprehensive Plan implications. The 48 units on 2.63 acres establishes a density at 18.235 units per acre, below the 20-25 units per acre required for the subject property, requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Council has authorized the initiation of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to create a new land use category of 15-19.9 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will be considered at the same time as the Council considers the Final Site and Building Plan, and the Final Plat. Engineer Comments. The city engineer has provided some review comments. They and the applicants response is provided in the attached Exhibit J. Fire Comments. The Fire Department has provided comments, incorporated in the staff comment letter, Exhibit I. FILE #LA21-42 June 21, 2021 Page 5 of 5 Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate any potential impacts of the proposed development ? 2. Does the Commission have comment on the flexibility requested: a. Height 30’9” instead of 30’ b. Private recreation area. 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the Master Development Plan, Rezoning, and preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed above. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Preliminary Plat Exhibit C. Site-Civil Plans Exhibit D. Architectural Plans Exhibit E. Exterior Amenity Space Exhibit F. Fire Truck Turning Exhibit G. Fire Hose Reach Exhibit H. Narrative Exhibit I. Staff Response letter Exhibit J. Engineer response letter Exhibit K. RPUD Regulations Exhibit L. Building Height Analysis Exhibit M. Mailing Information From:Victoria Seals To:Jeremy Barnhart Subject:Fwd: Proposed rezoning of 2060 Wayzata Blvd Date:Monday, June 21, 2021 5:44:00 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Rick Apple <applerc@gmail.com> Date: June 17, 2021 at 9:59:56 PM CDT To: jonressler@outlook.com, eriksonrobert@comcast.net, Christopher Bollis <christopherbollis@gmail.com>, Matt Gettman <MattGOronoMNPlanCommissionMbr@gmail.com>, Scott Kirchner <kirchner.scott@gmail.com>, Dennis Libby <dennislibby@remax.net>, Mark McCutcheon <mccutcheon.r.mark@gmail.com>, Dave Peterson <dpete40131@gmail.com> Cc: Connie Apple <connapple@gmail.com>, Denny Walsh <dwalsh2@ci.orono.mn.us>, "Aaron H. Printup" <aprintup@ci.orono.mn.us>, Victoria Seals <vseals@ci.orono.mn.us>, Richard Crosby <rcrosby@ci.orono.mn.us>, Matt Johnson <mjohnson@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Proposed rezoning of 2060 Wayzata Blvd Good evening. My name is Richard Apple and I am a resident of Sugar Woods, the neighborhood adjacent to the lot on which CBS MN Properties has requested a zoning change to accommodate a proposed three-story apartment building. While we are not yet privy to the details of the proposal (my understanding is that the deadline for comments is now, before the details are made available), I can say without hesitation that no three-story apartment building should be considered for that site and the proposal should be rejected without hesitation. As you know, there are communities in the Twin Cities who consider growth to be a defining attribute, an attribute that contributes to their "greatness." Plymouth, Maple Grove, and Woodbury are but three examples of communities that take pride in the amount of new development they have fostered. But other communities, Orono among them, have not and should not become a community of their sort. Since its founding, Orono has been defined by large open spaces, modest development, and a more rural character. Those are, in fact, among the most important qualities that drew my family and so many like-minded friends and neighbors to this area decades ago. I understand that reasonable people can disagree on what sort of community is Council Exhibit F LA21-42 most appealing. Varying preferences are, as they say, "what makes the world go 'round." For those who want rapid growth, increasing population, and the energy that comes with that, they have the option to seek out such a community; the three I mentioned are but examples of many. But those of us who want what Orono has traditionally been or, more correctly said, those of us who have been promised (via zoning regulations) what Orono has traditionally been, should not have the rug pulled out from under us. We have made our homes here, raised our families here, volunteered at the schools, and made this community the center of our lives. To allow our area to become a high density zone with multiple multi- unit dwellings would be to set aside all that we were promised and to reject us and all that we have contributed. That is not overstating the point. Consider how you would react to a zoning change that allowed an apartment building to be constructed next to your home or neighborhood even if such a building had not been allowed when you purchased your residence. It would be the breaking of a pact between a government and its citizens. So how could you in good conscience sanction the requested rezoning simply because it affects our neighborhood rather than yours? I hope you will reflect on these brief comments, take them to heart, and do as we ask: reject the request for rezoning. Sincerely, Richard Apple 2101 Sugarwood Drive EXISTING BUILDING HCHC DOG RUN 3,643 SF FRONT PATIO 1,575 SF BACKYARD/PATIO 11,588 SF N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 5 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 1 1 1 : 4 1 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ E X H I B I T - E x t e r i o r A m e n i t y S p a c e OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS-MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 05-19-21 05-19-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL EXTERIOR AMENITY SPACE EXHIBIT AREAS EXTERIOR AMENITY - 16,806 SF TOTAL Council Exhibit G LA21-42 EXISTING BUILDING HCHC EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE 15 10 2 7 11 5 12 EX. RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS MEET & MATCH EX. CURB PROPERTY LINE 1' OUTSIDE PATIOS REINFORCED TURF 45'R 17'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 10'R 3.4'R HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT MEET & MATCH EX. CURB DOG RUN 16.4 14.3 18.0 28.0 22.9 70.2 286.2 164.2 28.0 15'R 5.0 5.0 CONCRETE WALK EX. RETAINING WALL EX. PLAY AREA EX. PLAY AREA DOG WALK EXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLE N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 #### #### CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 5 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 1 9 : 3 7 A M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ C 2 - 1 S i t e P l a n OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 05-19-21 05-19-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN C2-1 PAVEMENT TYPES CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE & REPLACE PARKING LOT 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CURRENT ZONING: B-6 PUD PROPOSED ZONING:B-6 PUD PROPERTY AREA:2.63 +/- AC DISTURBED AREA:1.62 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.85 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.60 AC TOTAL PARKING: 62 SURFACE STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 66 UNDERGROUND STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 2 HC STALLS 1. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 6. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN, OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET(S) OF THE PROJECT PLANS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. 11.ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 12.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED 11/30/16. 13.SUBGRADE PREPARATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2112. THE TOP 3 FEET SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 14.AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE MNDOT 2211 CLASS 5. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD. 15.PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2360 WITH MIX DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS. COMPACTION SHALL BE BY THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD. 16.CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 200 FEET AT ALL FIXED OBJECTS. CONTRACTIONS JOINTS EVERY 10 FEET. 17.CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2521. CURING SHALL BE BY THE MEMBRANE CURING METHOD. EXPANSION JOINTS AT ALL FIVES OBJECTS. CONTRACTION JLINTS EVERY 5 FEET. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7 AM - 7 PM (MONDAY - FRIDAY) AND 9 AM - 7 PM ( SATURDAY.) A 48 HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. SITE NOTES SITE DATA GENERAL NOTES Council Exhibit H LA21-42 EXISTING BUILDING HCHC St . P a u l F i r e T r u c k SURMOUNTABLE CURB N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Pl o t t e d : 0 5 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 2 7 P M W: \ 2 0 1 9 \ 1 9 7 6 7 \ C A D D D A T A \ C I V I L \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ E X H I B I T - F i r e T r u c k T u r n i n g OUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS EAGLE RIDGE ORONO, MINNESOTA CBS-MN PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Shopek - PE 19624 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19767 JAS TRG VMA 05-19-21 05-19-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3-2 SWPP PLAN C3-3 SWPP NOTES & DETAILS C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAIL SHEETS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 05-19-21 CITY SUBMITTAL FIRE TRUCK TURNING EXHIBIT 41.17 7.17 18.42 4 41' Fire Truck Overall Length 41.170ft Overall Width 8.170ft Overall Body Height 10.461ft Min Body Ground Clearance 0.892ft Track Width 8.170ft Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual)45.00° Council Exhibit I LA21-42 Project Narrative Eagle Ridge Residential Development As an existing business owner in Orono, the objective of Dale Richardson and his company is to improve the property location and maintain the high quality standards the city proudly displays. The project will compliment the city's available need for up-scale multi-family housing. None of the existing multi-family developments in the area are specifically focused on the up-scale demographic being proposed. In addition, the project can provide an alternative to Orono residents who are downsizing and considering leaving the area to find this type of higher end rental options. The proposed development property was originally zoned for Light Office use and the business owner has submitted request and is awaiting Multi-family Residential approval to house the proposed Eagle Ridge Residential Development. The proposed development is an up-scale residential building offering fully self-contained (heat/AC, water heater and laundry) units and deluxe amenities. Amenities to include: Guest unit Rental (nightly) BBQ/Fire Pit Area Outdoor Recreation Area Fitness Room with Sauna Dog Run & Off-leash Play Area Underground Parking with Electric Car charging station Bike Racks Roof Top Deck Eagle Ridge Residential will feature a variety of 1Bedroom, 2 Bedroom and 3 Bedroom units housed in one building located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard in Orono, MN. The project will include underground parking and surface parking with extra spaces for guests. The driveway system allows access for emergency vehicles and handicapped-accessible parking will also be provided. A secure bike rack area will be provided, allowing residents to easily utilize the community's many bike trails. Owner may convert the proposed rentals in to private condominiums and sell as such in the future. Council Exhibit J LA21-42 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeremy Barnhart, City of Orono FROM: Val Anderson, PE, Loucks Associates CC: Dale Richardson, CBS MN Properties, LLC DATE: 6/11/2021 PROJECT: Eagle Ridge SUBJECT: Engineering Review #1 Loucks has received comments from the City’s engineer dated June 2, 2021. We have reviewed comments and addressed the comments to the best of ability. Please see written comments and responses below. 1.The following permits will need to be obtained and copies provided to the City conditional to City approval: a.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit b.NPDES Permit for Stormwater Discharge i Noted, permits are being submitted for as required 2.The rock construction entrance and pavement reconstruction are proposed on the adjacent property, and retaining wall construction along the east property line may require access to adjacent property. Therefore, a Temporary Construction agreement will be necessary with the owner of 2040 Wayzata Boulevard to install proposed improvements. A copy of the agreement must be provided to the City conditional to final approval. a.The rock construction has been moved to the property. There is some pavement disturbance to connect water. Our understanding is the current joint easements cover maintenance items. 3.An Engineer’s Estimate for proposed improvements must be provided to determine the Letter of Credit amount required. The letter of credit shall be 150% of the estimate. If Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requires an escrow for erosion control and restoration, additional escrow to the City of Orono should not be necessary for these items. a.An engineer’s estimate will be provided once final design is approved. 4.The condition of the regional pond and storm sewer east of the site must be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work. The pond bottom must be verified with survey prior to any work, and once work commences, the Contractor shall be responsible for removing any sediment added to the pond or sewer due to site construction. a.A note on sheet C3-1 has been added to verify the pond bottom. 5.Hydrant, gate valve, and fire connection locations must be reviewed by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. a.City staff has reviewed and will continue to review as needed. 6.All connections to watermain and sanitary sewer must be coordinated with the City. Contractor must provide a minimum 48-hour prior notice. a.Added to notes on sheet C4-1. 7.Perimeter erosion control measures must be installed by the Contractor and inspected by the City prior to any other work. Contractor must provide minimum 24-hour notice prior to inspection. a.Added to notes on C3-3 Council Exhibit K LA21-42 Page 2 8. Retaining walls 4’ or greater in height must be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer. Wall plans must be submitted for review prior to construction. a. Retaining walls over 4 ft in height will be designed by a professional engineer during construction plan preparation. 9. Fencing must be provided on walls 4’ or greater in height. Fencing must be indicated on the plans and details included accordingly. a. Fencing will be provided on top of walls to match existing black wrought iron fence along north side. See Architectural for detail. 10. Gate valves must be provided at or near proposed connection points to the existing system. The eastern connection must be adjusted so it is not directly under curb or in conflict with the storm sewer. a. Gate valves have been added and the rerouting has been adjusted so it is not under the curb or storm sewer. 11. Due to the inaccessible location of CBMH-18 and manhole depth, the applicant should consider removing the sump. a. Sump has been removed. 12. A Prairie Rose Crabapple near the entrance is indicated over the watermain. This tree location must be adjusted to remove the conflict. The Prairie Rose Crabapple has been relocated. 13. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans shall be revised as outlined in the attached SWPPP Review Checklist. Following are the general items that must be addressed: a. Identify persons responsible for inspections and BMP maintenance. A contractor has not been selected yet, when the project moves forward and a contractor is selected, their responsible person will be listed for maintenance and inspections. b. Provide map of surface waters, impaired waters within 1 mile. The map has been added, as well as a list of water bodies. c. Provide training certifications. Designer certificate has been added to the sheet C3-3, a copy of other certificates will be stored with the SWPPP as contractors are selected. 14. Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. a. Noted Page 3 Page 4 June 14, 2021 Mr. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: City Response Letter Eagle Ridge Multi-Family City File # LA21-000042 Mohagen Hansen Project #21011 Dear Mr. Barnhart: In response to your Inspection/Plan Review letter dated June 7, 2021, regarding the above referenced project, we would like to offer our explanation and resolution to the outstanding issues: Building Height 1. By my calculations, the building is 31 feet high, based on 10 feet above the lowest ground level. I’ve attached my worksheet. The Council was clear in not supporting any building higher than 30 feet, defined height. Response: The building can be reduced 1” for each residential floor. The final adjusted building height will be 30’-9”. Fire Comments 2. The Fire Chief, James Van Eyll, has provided comment: The fire department requires access to all sides of the building. The truck needs to be able to stretch a 300 foot hose line and reach all sides with the tip of that hose line. The Fire Department Connection (FDC) is required and so is the Post Indicating Valve (PIV). Both should be located in a visible spot. We prefer the front side of the building. The PIV should only shut off the water to the sprinkler system and not the entire building. Response: The attached graphic shows the 300 ft hose line will reach all sides of the building as well as C4-1. The attached plans show the PIV and FDC proposed locations. A separate domestic water line has been added to service the building on sheet C4-1. Engineering Comments 3. The city engineer’s comments are attached. Response: See attached Responses from the Civil Engineer General Comments 4. Please confirm the Floor Area Ratio by provided the floor areas of all levels of the structure. a. Please note on the plan where mechanical units (heating/ ventilation/ AC) will be located. If they are to be located on the roof, please provide a cross section of the elevation of the building with these units, to verify screening as required by 78-626 (14)g. Response: FAR = Floor= 79,125SF, Site=114,562.8SF – 79,125/114562.8 = .69 Response: The mechanical/AC will be located in each unit. The common area will have the same type of system with an interior closet within the common area. b. Please show any freestanding signage proposed. Council Exhibit L LA21-42 Eagle Ridge Multi-Family Response Letter June 14, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Response: The Existing Monument sign on Wayzata Blvd will be modified. c. Please provide a photometric plan, showing light levels throughout the site. Response: See Attached. Additional lights will be added to the building at each entry/exit door 5. Sheet A200 a. Please verify the turning radii for the spaces at the short end of the el, in particular those ‘west’ of the staircase. Response: Final parking will comply with parking regulations. See attached for Back-up dimensions. b. The width of the parking spaces are not dimensioned. Response: 9’-0” wide parking stalls provided. See Attached. c. I note that the spaces are 18’ deep where the city code requires 20’. Response: We have provided a 2’-0” min overhang. See Attached 6. Sheet A201. Please provide a layout of the apartment types. Response: See Attached. 7. Sheet A202. The community sitting area is highlighted, and outside of the building there is a note for community bike space. Please clarify, this appears to be up a level from grade. Response: This was a drawing error. 8. Site Plan a. Engineering will be required for the retaining walls. Response: This will be done with construction plan documents b. Some sort of fence or similar is necessary along to top of these walls that are greater than 4 feet. Response: Back picket fencing (similar to existing) will be on walls over 4 ft tall 9. Plat. The plat proposes a drainage and utility easement over all lot 3. Please verify this lot may also be used for parking, access, and signage. Response: Lot 3 will be used for parking, access and signage. D&U easements do not restrict these surface improvements 10. Grading and Drainage plan. This plan shows the existing sign for the day care center. Is another freestanding sign proposed, or with the apartment building utilize this sign structure? Response: The existing monument sign will be modified for new project Eagle Ridge Multi-Family Response Letter June 14, 2021 Page 3 of 3 11. Exterior Amenity Plan a. Please provide a detail of the fence around the dog run. Response: Black metal fence. b. A trail connection to the trail along Wayzata Blvd is recommended. Response: A trail connection to the sidewalk on Wayzata Blvd already exist at the SE corner of the site. 12. Landscaping Plan a. Landscaping requirements are outlined in Section 78-626 (14). The number of trees are based on the greater of 1 tree / 1000 sqft of footprint area, or 1 tree per 40 fee of lot width, whichever is greater. My calculations require 27 over-story trees, 12 coniferous, and 51 shrubs. Response: See attached for new landscape plan. b. The landscaping plan should include the 2-foot contours. Response: We will comply c. Please adjust the plan to meet those requirements. Response: See attached Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (952) 426-7400. Sincerely, MOHAGEN HANSEN Architecture | Interiors Jennifer Kaplan, AIA Project Manager K:\Jobs\EagleRidge- MultiFamily_21011\01_Admin\CODE_Entitlement\20210614_ResponseInformation\21011_RespLtr_JeremyBarnhart_20210609.docx Last Updated: January 2021 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 1 of 1 BUILDING HEIGHT Planning & Zoning Department 952-249-4620 www.ci.orono.mn.us All buildings in Orono are limited to a maximum building height of 30 feet or less, as defined within City Code Section 78-1 as follows: Building height means the vertical distance between the highest existing ground level or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the top of the cornice of a flat roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round or other arch-type roof, or the median height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. How to determine the defined height for a building: Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof* as defined above. (a) First Floor Elevation (from building plans): (b) Highest existing ground level touching the building’s footprint (per survey) or 10' above lowest ground level, whichever is lower: (c) Difference between (b) and (c)**: (d) DEFINED HEIGHT **If highest existing adjacent grade is above FFE - Height is (a) - (d) OR If highest existing adjacent grade is below FFE - Height is (a) + (d) (e) For More Information Contact the Planning and Zoning Department at 952-249-4620 or planning@ci.orono.mn.us. *Highest Existing Ground Level is 1018 Lowest Ground Level 89'4" + 10' is 99'4" 30' 4" 100' *99' 4" 8" 31' 0" Council Exhibit M LA21-42 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING PLAYGROUND PLAYGROUND D O G R U N PATIO ENTRY WAYZATA BOULEVARD N EAGLE RIDGE MULTI-FAMILY SITE PLAN ORONO, MN 07/06/21 Council Exhibit N LA21-42 AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: A. Carlson Approved By: 1. Purpose. To consider changes to the city code pertaining to issuing licenses allowing for the placement of docks on right of way on Big Island. 2. Background. On May 10, 2021, the City Council directed staff to prepare changes to the city code that would allow for the issuance of licenses for inland Big Island property owners to place a dock on 1 of 7 Big Island rights of way that terminate at the lake. On May 28th, the Council adjusted the plan to have the city install the docks. This shift required additional changes to the draft ordinance, which were prepared by the city attorney. The draft ordinance was sent to the LMCD staff and Orono’s representative, Richie Anderson, for comment on June 11th. Mr. Anderson’s response is attached as Exhibit C. LMCD staff’s response is attached as Exhibit G. In phone conversation, it was noted that licensing, variances, or other approval from the LMCD may be necessary depending on the site and the requested lot configuration. City staff has reviewed the rights of way labeled BI-4, BI-6, and BI-7. Staff’s observations on these accesses are: BI-4: “very flat and easy access. No maintenance required. Couldn’t find any clear markings of where the ROW is. The posts you see in the pictures seem to be an old volleyball net.” BI-6: “Much tougher to find this one. Very wooded and on a decent slope. A lot of maintenance would need to be done for immediate access. Only have one picture because the shoreline was too rocky to get the pontoon up to it.” BI-7: “this is the skinny one, but probably the best access in the immediate. Clearly you can see someone had used it this spring when it was wet. Deep rutting. Clear marking must have been done by the neighbor to the south which looks like a pretty new building.” 3. Public Comment. Public Comments received to date are provided as Exhibit D. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council approve or amend the draft ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the ordinance and adopt or amend. Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance B. Draft license agreement C. LMCD Rep Anderson’s comment D. Public Comment E. Big Island Dock Map F. Dock site pictures G. LMCD response comments Item No.: 16 Date: July 12, 2021 Item Description: LA21-000040 – Text Amendment Related to Dock Licenses on Big Island Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Agenda Section: Community Development Report Title IV - BUSINESS, LICENSING, LIQUOR REGULATION Chapter 38 - AMUSEMENTS AND ENTERTAINMENTS ARTICLE VI. PUBLIC LAKESHORE, LAKESHORE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND DOCKS Orono, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 1 of 6 ARTICLE VI. PUBLIC LAKESHORE, LAKESHORE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND DOCKS 1 Sec. 38-900. Definitions. 2 For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the meaning given them. 3 Dock shall mean any wharf, pier, boat ramp, boat slip, or other structure constructed or maintained in, upon, 4 or into the water of a lake from either public property or public rights-of-way. 5 Dock accessories shall mean all structures and materials used in conjunction with a dock including but not 6 limited to boat lifts, buoys, fences or other obstructions and permanent or semipermanent steps, ramps or other 7 structures leading to the shoreline. 8 Dock site shall mean the property designated in the license issued pursuant to this section and as designated 9 on the dock location map to be maintained by the city. 10 Public property or public rights-of-way shall mean all publicly owned property and all public rights-of-way 11 that are immediately adjacent to a lakeshore, as designated on the dock location map to be maintained at all times 12 by the city pursuant to this section. 13 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 14 Sec. 38-901. License required. 15 No person shall erect, place, keep, or maintain a dock or other structure from on public property or public 16 rights-of-way without a dock license for Crystal Bay Road dock sites. No person use a dock on a dock site on public 17 rights-of-way without a dock license for Big Island dock sites. 18 19 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 20 Sec. 38-902. Applications. 21 Applications for dock licenses shall contain the following information and such other information as the city 22 deems necessary: 23 (1)Full name of applicant; 24 (2)Address;25 (3)Preferred dock location on the dock location map and, if applying for Crystal Bay Road dock site, dock26 specifications; 27 (4)Boat license number of any boats to be moored at the dock. 28 (5)An application fee as established by the city council. The application fee shall be refunded if the29 applicant is not awarded a dock license.30 (6)Proof of ownership of residential lot.31 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 32 Council Exhibit A LA21-40 Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 2 of 6 Sec. 38-903. Eligible applicants. 33 34 A. Crystal Bay Road. 35 Property owners of land adjacent to city owned lakeshore parcels as described in the table below are eligible 36 to apply for a dock license for said site or sites. Only one individual per household may apply for a dock license and 37 only one license shall be issued per city owned parcel. 38 Residential Lot Dock site PID 3445 Crystal Bay Road Is eligible for 1711723430123 3435 Crystal Bay Road Is eligible for 1711723430119 3415 Crystal Bay Road Is eligible for 1711723430117 3407 Crystal Bay Road Is eligible for 1711723430115 39 B. Big Island 40 The city has identified 7 properties with lake accesses on Big Island on the official dock site map maintained 41 in the office of the city clerk. Inland lot of record owners on Big Island may apply for a dock license on city-42 owned property or right-of-way for the express purpose of facilitating access to their property via boat. 43 Sec. 38-904. Application approval and denial. 44 The dock administrator shall provide a recommendation to the city council who shall approve or deny all 45 applications. No application shall be approved if there are any outstanding noncompliance orders against the 46 applicant or if the proposed dock will not comply with all terms of the City Code. 47 Applications will be reviewed in the order in which they are received. 48 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 49 Sec. 38-905. Terms of license for Crystal Bay Road dock sites. 50 Before a dock license is issued for Crystal Bay Road dock sites, the applicant must sign a license agreement 51 containing the following terms and conditions and other provisions as the council may require. 52 (1) Rights and liabilities. Except as otherwise provided, a city dock license entitles the license holder to the 53 exclusive use and control of the dock site and the same rights, obligations and liabilities as a private 54 property owner. In addition to the provisions of this section, all dock license sites shall fully comply 55 with LMCD regulations and all applicable state laws and regulations. 56 (2) Indemnification. Dock license holders shall be solely responsible for the dock license site and all 57 activities thereon. The license holder shall indemnify, defend , and hold the city, its officers, boards, 58 commissions, agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all lawsuits, claims, causes of 59 action, liability, and costs, of any nature that the city may at any time, directly or indirectly, suffer, 60 sustain in any way connected with the grant of a dock license or activities on the dock license site. 61 (3) Docks. The license holder shall maintain only one dock at the dock license site. 62 (4) License plates. Dock license plates shall be issued by the city after approval of the license applicati on. 63 The license plate must be securely fixed to the streetside end of the licensed dock. License plates shall 64 be maintained by the licensee and shall remain the property of the city. 65 Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 3 of 6 (5) Transferability. Dock licenses may not be sold, assigned, licensed, or otherwise transferred in any way 66 to any person, partnership or corporation, except that the license may be transferred to a purchaser of 67 the license holder's residential property within the city . Dock space may not be rented. (6) Removal 68 of docks. Upon termination of a dock license, the license holder must completely remove the licensed 69 dock and all accessory items, including but not limited to stairs leading to the dock from the public 70 property or public right-of-way. Any dock or accessory item that has not been removed will be 71 removed by the city and all costs the responsibility of the last license holder for that dock site. 72 (7) Dock construction; specifications and dimensions. 73 a. Docks on dock sites shall comply with LMCD regulations. 74 b. Docks shall be constructed of materials approved by the dock inspector; docks shall be of plank 75 or rail construction; and all dock posts shall be of equal height above the dock; 76 c. Docks shall not be located closer than ten feet to a neighboring dock license site or private 77 property line. The dock administrator may refer, and the city council may grant exceptions where 78 there are unusual circumstances and such an exception will not have a detrimental impact on the 79 lake. The city council may impose conditions on any exception granted under this subsection. 80 d. Docks may not be permanently installed. 81 (8) Dock accessories. All dock accessories must be approved in writing prior to use at a dock site. 82 (9) Dock storage. Docks must be removed from the water no later than November 1. Docks and dock 83 accessories may not be stored on the dock site between November 1 and April 1 of the following year. 84 (10) Declaration of watercraft—Requirements. Watercraft that are moored at a city dock or multiple slip 85 site must be declared on the dock license application. The applicant must provide the city with a copy 86 of the current DNR watercraft registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation or recently applied for 87 DNR watercraft registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation for each watercraft, at the time of 88 application. This DNR registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation must verify that the watercraft is 89 in the name of the licensee. If a declared watercraft is removed from the city dock program, the site 90 holder may substitute a replacement watercraft upon providing the city with required documentation 91 as stated above. Newly declared replacement watercraft may be subject an additional LMCD fee. 92 a. Allowable mooring of non-owned watercraft. Mooring of watercraft not owned by the dock 93 licensee is permitted for a period of up to 48 hours, two times in a calendar year. 94 Unless permitted under the preceding two subsections, no watercraft shall be moored at a city dock 95 site. 96 b. A license grants the licensee one boat per dock site. Two license holders may share a dock allowing 97 a total of two boats. 98 (11) Subject to inspections. All licensed docks are subject to inspection at reasonable times by the dock 99 inspector or his or her designee. 100 (12) City access. The city shall be free to enter the dock site for any reason at any reasonable time and to 101 perform maintenance and regulatory functions to be specified in the terms of the dock license 102 agreement. 103 (13) Costs. All costs of maintaining licensed docks and dock accessories are the responsibility of the license 104 holder. 105 (14) Term. All dock licenses on Crystal Bay Road shall be valid for ten years. 106 (15) License fee. The city council shall establish license fees. License fees shall not increase during the term 107 of a license. A licensee must pay a license fee in full at the beginning of the term of the license by April 108 Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 4 of 6 1 of each calendar year of the term of the license. Failure to pay the license fee by April 1 sha ll result in 109 the termination the license agreement. 110 In the event the licensee paid a license fee at the beginning of the term, and the license is terminated, the 111 city may refund a prorated amount of the license fee, based on the number of years remaining at the time of 112 refund request, unless the licensee owes the city for costs and expenses as outlined in the license 113 agreement. 114 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 115 116 Sec. 38-9065. Terms of license for Big Island dock sites. 117 Dock sites on Big Island are offered to provide dockage opportunity for inland lots to access their property 118 via public right of way. Before a dock license is issued for Big Island dock sites, the applicant must sign a license 119 agreement containing the following terms and conditions and other provisions as the council may require. 120 (1) Rights and liabilities. The Licensee shall be permitted to use the Property for the purposes described in 121 this License Agreement and shall not use the Property for any other purposes. In addition to the 122 provisions of this section, all dock license sites shall fully comply with LMCD regulations and all 123 applicable state laws and regulations. 124 (2) Indemnification. Dock license holders shall be solely responsible for the dock license site and all 125 activities thereon. The license holder shall indemnify, defend, and hold the city, its officers, boards, 126 commissions, agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all lawsuits, claims, causes of 127 action, liability, and costs, of any nature that the city may at any time, directly or indirectly, suffer, 128 sustain in any way connected with the grant of a dock license or activities on the dock license site. 129 (3) Docks. The license holder household may obtain only one license. shall maintain only one dock at the 130 dock license site. 131 (4) License plates. Dock license plates shall be issued by the city after approval of the license application. 132 The license plate must be securely fixed to the lakestreetside end of the licensed dock. License plates 133 shall be maintained by the licensee and shall remain the property of the city. 134 (5) Transferability. Big Island dock licenses may not be transferred. 135 (6) Storage Items. The license holder shall not store any accessory items at the dock site except fo r the 136 boat. The City may remove any accessory items from the dock site and treat it as abandoned property 137 in accordance with law, and all costs will be the responsibility of the last license holder for the site . 138 (7) Removal of boat. Upon termination of a dock license, the license holder must remove the boat. Any 139 item that has not been removed will be removed by the city and treated as abandoned property in 140 accordance with law and all costs will be the responsibility of the last licen se holder for that dock site. 141 (87) Dock specifications. Docks within right-of-way on Big Island will not extend more than 24 feet from the 142 Ordinary High Water Line (OHW).). The dock administrator may refer, and the city council may grant 143 exceptions where there are unusual circumstances, and such an exception will not have a detrimental 144 impact on the lake. The city council may impose conditions on any exception granted under this 145 subsection. 146 (98) Dock accessories. All dock accessories must be approved in writing prior to use at a dock site. 147 (109) Dock and Dock Site Usage. Docks and dock sites may only be used after the City places the dock on the 148 dock site. The City will endeavor to place docks on dock sites on by May April 1. The license holder shall 149 not be entitled to a prorated license fee if the City places the dock on the dock site after April May 1. 150 Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 5 of 6 The license holder shall cease using the dock and dock site on November 1 of each year. The license 151 holder shall remove the boat from the dock site no later than November 1 of each year. 152 (110) Declaration of watercraft—Requirements. Watercraft that are moored at a city dock or multiple slip 153 site must be declared on the dock license application. The applicant must provide the city with a copy 154 of the current DNR watercraft registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation or recently applied for 155 DNR watercraft registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation for each watercraft, at t he time of 156 application. This DNR registration or U.S. Coast Guard documentation must verify that the watercraft is 157 in the name of the licensee. If a declared watercraft is removed from the city dock program, the site 158 holder may substitute a replacement watercraft upon providing the city with required documentation 159 as stated above. Newly declared replacement watercraft may be subject an additional LMCD fee. 160 a. Allowable mooring of non-owned watercraft. Mooring of watercraft not owned by the dock 161 licensee is permitted for a period of up to 48 hours, two times in a calendar year. 162 Unless permitted under the preceding two subsections, no watercraft shall be moored at a city dock 163 site. 164 b. A license grants the licensee one boat per dock site. Two license holder s may share a dock allowing 165 a total of two boats. 166 (121) Subject to inspections. All licensed docks are subject to inspection at reasonable times by the dock 167 inspector or his or her designee. 168 (132) City access. The city shall be free to enter the dock site for any reason at any reasonable time and to 169 perform maintenance and regulatory functions to be specified in the terms of the dock license 170 agreement. 171 (143) Costs. All costs of maintaining licensed docks and dock accessories are the responsibility of th e license 172 holder. 173 (154) Term. Big Island Dock licenses expire November 1 of each year. 174 (165) License fee. The city council shall establish license fees. License fees shall not increase during the term 175 of a license. A licensee must pay a license fee in full at the beginning of the term of the license by April 176 1 of each calendar year of the term of the license. Failure to pay the license fee may be causer theyo 177 denial of they license application. by April 1 shall result in the termination the license agreement. 178 Sec. 38-9076. Administration. 179 (a) Dock administrator. The city council shall appoint a dock administrator who shall be responsible for the 180 administration of the city dock licensing program to include: processing applications, and maintaining the 181 dock location map. 182 (b) Dock location map. There shall be on file with the city a map maintained by the dock administrator showing 183 the approved locations of docks on public land and public rights-of-way. The map shall contain the following 184 information: 185 (1) Locations of public property and public rights-of-way; 186 (2) Specific dock locations; 187 (3) A numerical designation for each dock location to correspond with a list of license holders; 188 (4) Restrictions applicable to certain areas of shoreline; 189 (5) Shoreline access points; 190 (6) Shoreline areas available for winter storage. 191 Commented [SC1]: License fee amount for Big Island Docks? The Crystal Bay licenses are $325 per year. To be determined based on the costs. Created: 2021-05-05 16:16:04 [EST] (Supp. No. 19, Update 2) Page 6 of 6 (c) Inspections; license revocation. The dock administrator or designee shall from time to time inspect any dock 192 erected or maintained on public property or public rights -of-way. If there are any violations of the City Code, 193 state statute or state regulation, the dock license holder shall be notified in writing of the way or ways the 194 dock or dock area does not comply. The license holder shall have 14 days to remove the dock or otherwise 195 bring the dock license site into compliance. If the violation is not corrected after 14 days, the license shall be 196 revoked and all property removed from the dock license site unless, within the 14 days, the dock 197 administrator receives from the license holder a written request for a hearing. 198 (d) [Appeals.] Appeals from any decision of the dock administrator shall be as provided for in section 2 -41 of the 199 City Code. 200 (Ord. No. 239 3rd series, § 1, 3-9-2020) 201 202 1 DOCK SITE LICENSE AGREEMENT BIG ISLAND THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is made on _______________________________ between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55323 (the “City”), and ___________________________, an individual who owns property at _______________________________________________________ (“Licensee”). WHEREAS, the City has made available docks and dock sites at specified locations on public property and public rights of way; WHEREAS, Licensee wishes to utilize a dock at a dock site and agrees to the terms of this License Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1.License to Use Property. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License Agreement, the City hereby grants to the Licensee a license to use Dock Site # _______ (“Dock Site”), as designated on the official Orono Dock Location Map. 2.Term. The term of this License Agreement shall be for one (1) year and will commence on __________________________ and end on November 1st, subject to Section 3(J) of this Agreement, unless terminated prior thereto as provided herein. 3.Conditions. The City and the Licensee agree that the Licensee will use the Dock Site subject to the following conditions: A.Docks. The Licensee shall maintain only one (1) boat at the Dock Site. B.License plates. Licensee shall securely fix the license plate issued by the City to the end of the licensed dock. License plates shall be maintained by the Licensee and shall remain the property of the City. C.Storage Items. The Licensee shall not be permitted to store any accessory items on the dock site, except for the boat. The Licensee understands that the City may remove any storage items from the dock site, and the costs of said removal shall be the responsibility of the Licensee. D.Fires. No fires of any kind shall be permitted on the Dock Site. E.Landscaping. Licensee shall not cut or disrupt any trees or other vegetation along the shoreline in any way. All landscaping activity must be approved by the City. F.Mowing. Licensee shall mow and maintain the Dock Site area. G.Trails. Licensee shall not obstruct the trails adjacent to the Dock Site in any way. H.Watercraft. The Licensee shall only moor watercraft that were declared on the Licensee’s Dock License Application at the Dock Site. If the declared watercraft is Council Exhibit B LA21-40 2 removed from the City dock program, the Licensee may substitute a replacement watercraft upon providing the City with the documentation it requires. Newly declared replacement watercraft may be subject an additional LMCD fee. Mooring of watercraft not owned by the Licensee is permitted for a period of up to 48 hours, only two (2) times in a calendar year. Except as described in the Orono City Code and herein, no watercraft shall be moored at the Dock Site. I. Dock accessories. All dock accessories must be approved in writing by the Dock Inspector prior to use at the Dock Site. No boat lifts or covering structures are permitted. J. Dock Usage. The Licensee may only use the dock and dock site after the City places the dock on the dock site. The City shall endeavor to place th e dock on the dock site by April 1 of each year, but Licensee understands that the weather or other constraints may prevent the City from placing the dock by April 1. The City will place the dock on the dock site as soon as practicable. If the dock is placed on the dock site later than April 1, the Licensee shall not be entitled to a prorated license fee. The Licensee shall cease using the dock on November 1 of each year. The Licensee shall ensure that the boat is removed from the dock by November 1 of each year. 4. Use and Control of Property. The Licensee shall be permitted to use the Property for the purposes described in this License Agreement and shall not use the Property for any other purposes. The Licensee shall not use the Dock Site, or permit anything to be done in or about the Property, which will in any way conflict with any law, statute, ordinance, or governmental rule or regulation. The Licensee shall use and keep the Dock Site in a clean and orderly condition. 5. City Access. City staff shall be free to enter the Dock Site for any reason at any time to perform maintenance, landscaping, inspections, and other regulatory functions. 6. Failure to Comply. If the Licensee fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement, the City Code, a state statute or a state regulation, the Licensee shall be notified in writing of the way or ways the dock or Dock Site area does not comply. The Licensee shall have fourteen (14) days to bring the Dock Site into compliance. If the violation is not corrected within fourteen (14) days, the license shall be revoked, this Agreement shall be terminated and all property shall be removed from the dock site unless, within the fourteen (14) days, the Dock Administrator receives from the Licensee a written request for a hearing. 7. Payment. The Licensee agrees to pay for all costs of bringing the Dock Site into compliance, including the costs of removing property from the dock site. 8. Indemnification. The Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from and against all liability, damages, penalties, judgments, or claims of whatever nature arising from injury to person or property sustained by anyone arising out of use by the Licensee, its members, guests and invitees and occupancy of the Dock Site and will at Licensee’s own cost and expense defend any and all suits or actions (just or unjust) which may be brought against the City or in which the City may be impleaded with others upon any such above-mentioned matter, claim, or claims. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement will include indemnity against all costs, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claims or proceedings brought thereon and the 3 defense thereof. All of the indemnifications contained in this License Agreement shall survive the expiration or termination of this License Agreement. 9. Liability Insurance. Licensee will, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, provide and maintain during the term of this License Agreement a blanket or general liability insurance policy against claims for personal injury, death, or property damage occurring in connection with the use and occupancy of the Dock Site. 10. Property Damage Insurance. Licensee will, at Licensee’s sole cost and expense, provide and maintain all risk property insurance during the term of this License Agreement in an amount sufficient to cover all items of property owned, maintained, or controlled by Licensee, its members, guests and invitees on the Dock Site. 11. Transferability. Dock licenses may not be sold, assigned, licensed, or otherwise transferred in any way to any person, partnership or corporation. Dock space may not be rented. 12. Waiver of Default. Any waiver by the City of a default under the provisions of this License Agreement will not operate or be construed as a waiver of a subsequent default by Licensee. No waiver will be valid unless in writing and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk on behalf of the City. 13. Invalidity of Provisions. If any term or provision of this License Agreement or any application hereof to any person or circumstance is to any extent found to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this License Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable will not be affected thereby and each term and provision of this License Agreement will be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 14. Entire Agreement. This instrument together with the Lease Agreement contain the entire and only agreement between the parties, and no oral statements or representations or prior written matter not contained in this instrument will have any force and effect. This License Agreement cannot be modified in any way except by writing executed by both parties. 15. Governing Law. This License Agreement will be governed exclusively by the provisions hereof and by the laws of the State of Minnesota, as the same from time to time exists. 16. Attorney’s Fees. The Licensee shall pay all of the City’s costs, charges, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and fees of agents and others retained by the City, incurred in enforcing Licensee’s obligations hereunder or incurred by the City in any litigation, negotiation or transaction in which Licensee causes the City, without the City’s fault, to become involved or concerned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective the day and year first above written. 4 CITY OF ORONO BY: Mayor Dennis Walsh Attest:__________________________________________ Anna Carlson, City Clerk LICENSEE: Printed Name: From:Anderson, Rich To:Jeremy Barnhart Cc:Adam Edwards Subject:RE: Dock License Ord for LMCD review Date:Monday, June 14, 2021 3:15:01 PM Adam and Jeremy: “The City will endeavor to place docks on dock sites on April 1” I think this should be more vague…. General ice out on the lake is April 15th, and wondering why the city would want to assist in this buying and placement of the dock…. If the licensee does not perform according to the specs, make them come into compliance…. If city wants to buy and place the docks, give the dock installer some wiggle room on timing of install…. The fall is no problem…. b.A license grants the licensee one boat per dock site. Two license holders may share a dock allowing a total of two boats. Only question I have on this reg is the situation where the setback requirement does not allow a second boat in the setback…. I have not looked at any other application than the one that was brought up last meeting, two boats = 17’…. 10’ setback on each side=20’ so we are at 37’ and maybe a 4’ dock so 41’…. Does that fit as I remember something like 35’ of frontage…. I like the 24’ rule for length and assuming someone has thought of the average boat length on Minnetonka is 24’…. Thanks for allowing me input and will support the city in the way they want to go…. You should definitely charge more money for the privilege of using city property…. $3500/ year would be more than fair…. From: Jeremy Barnhart [mailto:jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 10:26 AM To: 'Matthew Cook' <mcook@lmcd.org>; 'vschleuning@lmcd.org' <vschleuning@lmcd.org> Cc: Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us>; Anderson, Rich <rich@nsmarina.com> Subject: Dock License Ord for LMCD review Vicki and Matt, The City of Orono is contemplating establishing a program where inland lot of record holders on Big Island could obtain a license to dock their boat on a city owned dock that is on one of the platted right of ways on Big Island. The ordinance establishing this program is attached, and I would appreciate any feedback you have for the Council’s consideration. I anticipate this ordinance being presented to the City Council on Monday, June 28th, and if you have comments to be included in the Council informational packet, please provide them by noon on Tuesday, June 22nd. If you would like to discuss the ordinance, feel free to give me a call directly at 952-249-4626. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Council Exhibit C LA21-40 City of Orono 952-249-4626 Council Exhibit D LA21-40 From:Melanie Curtis To:Jeremy Barnhart Subject:FW: Big Island Dock Date:Friday, June 11, 2021 8:24:02 AM Attachments:Big Island Nature Park Rules (PDF).pdf May 24 Orono City Council Meeting.docx FYI Can you respond to David or at least acknowledge his email? Melanie Curtis (952.249.4627 *mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK! From: David Saari [mailto:david.saari@advantagesolutions.net] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:10 PM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Eric Saari <esaari@na.ko.com> Subject: Big Island Dock Melanie, Thoughts I had planned to share with the Mayor and City Council on the 24th are attached. Clearly there is disagreement on the rights of inland land owners to access the island via the property adjacent to us at 260 Big Island. However if legal access is ultimately granted, management of the water front is paramount. The access is just that, an access. The property is not to be construed as waterfront for the inland land owners as evident by the taxes assessed. The city has already developed a thorough list of rules and regs for the Big Island Nature Park that need to be considered and appropriately applied to all granted access locations. Sec. 22-113. Regulation of General Conduct and Sec. 22-114. General Park Operation Regulations have applicable rules and regs that should be considered and modified if needed. The following bolded statements from the Regulation of Recreation Activity are certainly applicable: (1) Camping. Overnight camping within the Park is prohibited. (2)Picnicking. Picnicking in the Park is allowed subject to the following: (i) No person or group shall assume exclusive use of a picnic site or shelter. (ii) No person or group shall set up temporary shelters, tents, tarps, canopies and other such devices without authorization by permit. (3) Swimming. Swimming in Lake Minnetonka is at the individual’s own risk. Lifeguards are not provided. (4) Boating & Dock Use. It shall be unlawful to land a watercraft or leave a watercraft unattended except at locations designated for that purpose. The docks at the main landing area are intended solely for the purpose of loading and unloading boats. No overnight docking is allowed. It shall be unlawful to fish, lounge, sunbathe or otherwise loiter on said docks. It shall be unlawful to dive or jump from the docks. It shall be unlawful to use the docks in a manner so as to disturb or endanger any other person. (5) Hunting & Fishing. Hunting and trapping are prohibited in the Park at all times. Shore fishing is allowed except in the designated swimming beach area. Fishing from the boat docks at the main landing area is prohibited. It is unlawful to fish in an area designated as a “no fishing” area. (6) Golf Practice. Hitting golf balls in the Park is prohibited. (7) Research Activity. Research activity within the Park shall be by permit only There is significant disagreement with the city approving additional access to the island via our neighboring property. We do not know what the outcome will be. However, unlike the initial Dock Site License Agreement LA21-40 presented at the May 24 council meeting, there should be public input into the License development to insure visibility for all involved. Should we get to that point, I would volunteer my time to participate in the development of the Dock Site License. Thank you for sharing my thoughts with the Mayor and City Council. Regards. David Saari 21035 Oak Lane Greenwood, MN 55331 M: +1 612-747-3606 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e- mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Judson and Aleya Champlin 2643 Thoroughbred Lane, Orono, MN 55356 612-240-8100/612-419-0200 June 2, 2021 Jeremy Barnhart Community Development Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re:Follow-Up to Orono City Council’s May 24th Proposal Director Barnhart: In view of the City's new May 24th proposal to install a City-owned dock at a public right-of-way on Big Island, we are providing additional comments objecting to the new proposal. Under this new proposal,it is not clear whether the City-owned dock would be a municipal dock or a private dock under LMCD rules,as the Council indicated that the dock would only be available to Big Island interior lot owners requesting a dock license.The City,however,would be purchasing the dock and paying for its operations,such as installation, removal and storage. Our objections to a private dock on the public right-of-way at Bay Place are on the record.We are now providing additional objections if this new proposal is for a municipal dock,owned by the City,on the Bay Place public right-of-way.These new objections supplement our prior objections that apply to any dock on the public-right-of-way at Bay Place,including setback limitations (see attachment for details on the setback objections). Special Density License As noted previously,a special density license would be required from LMCD,as the City plans to accommodate two boats on a single dock at the 37 foot Bay Place right-of-way,which exceeds LMCD’s one boat per 50 feet of shoreline ordinance.(See,LMCD Code §2-4.05 Subd.1.) Further,as a general matter,LMCD Code §2-4.11 Subd.1 notes that one watercraft per 50 feet of shoreline at a specific site is appropriate for Lake Minnetonka. LMCD Code §2-4.11 Subd.1 provides an exception to the 50-foot rule under a “special density license”where,“increased watercraft storage density may be clearly demonstrated to be a benefit to the Lake.”A dock at the Bay Place right-of-way offers no benefit to the Lake and in fact will result in environmental degradation to the Lake due to damage to shoreline caused by a dock and increased boat traffic in an area which provides natural filtration to water runoff from Big Island. Further,LMCD Code §2-4.11 Subd.2 states that “A special density license may only be issued for the following structures:(a)Commercial single dock;(b)Commercial multiple dock;(c) Commercial mooring area; or (d) Municipal multiple dock.” A “multiple dock”is defined in LMCD Code §1-3.01 Subd.55 as “any dock constructed or maintained for the storage of five or more restricted watercraft.”In addition,LMCD Code §6-3.01 Subd.4(c)requires that there be no overnight storage.Please also see the Review Criteria set forth in § 6-3.01 Subd. 3. The proposed City-owned dock at the Bay Place right-of-way is therefore not eligible for an LMCD special density license under the LMCD Code.As such,watercraft on a dock at the Bay Place public right-of-way will not comply with LMCD’s one boat per 50 feet of shoreline ordinance (LMCD Code § 2-4.05 Subd. 2). Even if the dock were to qualify for a special density license,LMCD setbacks for multiple docks are doubled from the standard setbacks (LMCD Code §2.303 Subd.2.)further reducing the authorized dock usage area at the public right-of-way at Bay Place. Additional Proposal We strongly encourage the City to instead consider installing a City-owned private dock at Orono’s Big Island Nature Park which would fully comply with the LMCD ordinances and would provide licensed dock access to the interior lot owners on Big Island. A City-owned private dock at Big Island Nature Park could be configured as a municipal multiple dock,and therefore would be eligible for a special density license on the Orono park property as needed.The private dock operations could easily be coordinated with the City’s installation,maintenance and storage of the public docks at Big Island Nature Park,minimizing the City’s expenses and liabilities.Placing the dock on the Orono park property would provide the City with the maximum level of control over the dock and the shoreline on which the dock is installed. This Big Island Nature Park approach could accommodate five or even more watercraft, providing a resolution to the current issue as well as options for future dock license requests from other interior lot owners on Big Island. Thank you for your consideration of our comments and additional proposal. /Judson Champlin/ /Aleya Champlin/ Judson and Aleya Champlin Attachment Diagram based on March 11,2021 email communication from Jud Champlin to Melanie Curtis indicating approximation of setbacks from adjacent property lines as described by LMCD Applicant’s proposed dock location as shown in Dock Permit Application LA21-000017 80 0.0 © Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Dock Sites - Big Island This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 5/18/2021 2:44 PM 800 Feet Railroad City Limits Parcels (4/20/2021) Boundary Footprint Image Red: Red Green: Green Blue: Blue Council Exhibit E LA21-40 Dock site B1-4 Council Exhibit F LA21-40 Dock Site BI-6 Dock Site BI-7 From:Vickie Schleuning To:Jeremy Barnhart Cc:Adam Edwards; Vickie Schleuning; Matthew Cook Subject:RE: Dock Ordinance Date:Wednesday, July 7, 2021 11:31:27 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png Hello Jeremy, The following information is in response to your inquiry regarding the LMCD code as it relates to a proposed city ordinance which would expand the docking and lake storage at city properties, beyond the existing licensed city sites. I briefly reviewed the draft ordinance and there are a few conflicts with LMCD code. It should be made clear to applicants that they must meet the minimums of the LMCD code and each site needs to be reviewed independently. Further, any deviation from LMCD code would require a variance from LMCD. I would also suggest that you check with your city attorney regarding language about “exclusive rights” to city property since that was a point of contention during the recent litigation involving a different city. It appears that the intent of this ordinance is to only allow private docking/storage at certain city properties located on Crystal Bay Road and Big Island. For Big Island, I understand that the City is contemplating an ordinance establishing a program where inland lot of record holders on Big Island could obtain licenses to dock their boats on city owned docks located on seven platted rights-of-way on Big Island per your map. More details would be required for each site if you choose to apply for licenses to allow the installation of docks and storage of watercraft/structures at these locations. In the meantime, the following general information is offered in light of the proposed ordinance as it relates to the LMCD code. 1.Since these appear to be new dock/storage sites, generally the current code would need to be met for setbacks, length, boat density, etc. If the site does not meet certain code requirements, an application for consideration of a variance could be submitted for review by the LMCD Board if the variance criteria are met. (LMCD Code 6-5.01. Variances) 2.The riparian rights holder and any legal shared rights would be reviewed as part of the application review process. The City would need to verify riparian authority as part of the process and provide information about the reasonableness of the proposed uses. 3.A license is required, and the license holder would be responsible for compliance and ongoing maintenance. 4.The dock use area requirements for length and side setbacks would apply. Setback distances may vary depending on the measurement of the 929.4 ft OHW shoreline. In certain cases, the setback distance may be doubled where not located adjacent to a site with a multiple or commercial dock license. The use of canopies may also affect the required setback. In cases where a site was in existence on February 2, 1970, and has 50 feet or less, reduced setbacks may apply. Please see the enclosed setback requirements for more information. 5.The boat density is generally one watercraft per 50 feet of shoreline. There may be some Council Exhibit G LA21-40 exceptions depending on when the site was in existence. 6. Other items that would be taken into consideration for each site include vegetation, water depth, utilities, converging lot lines, and other issues that might affect the use of the site. Please note the LMCD Board of Directors has not taken a formal position on the regulation of docks by cities. These comments do not express an opinion on whether the proposed regulations are preempted under the same rational as the Court’s ruling in City of Birchwood Village v. Simes, 576 N.W.2d 458 (Minn. App. 1998). Highlighted Code Excerpts 2-3.01. Authorized Dock Use Area Regulations. Subd. 1. Uses Outside of Dock Use Area. No person shall use any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docks, moorings, watercraft storage, swimming floats, ski jump storage, or diving towers, unless such use is specifically permitted under the provisions of this Code. Subd. 2. Uses Within Dock Use Area. No person shall use any area of the Lake within any authorized dock use area for docks, moorings, watercraft storage, swimming floats, ski jump storage, or diving towers without the consent of the riparian owner. Subd. 3. Discarded Watercraft. No person who is in charge or control of any property on the Lake, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allow any sunken, wrecked, junked, or discarded watercraft to remain within any authorized dock use area for a period of longer than one week. This limitation shall not apply to watercraft within the authorized dock use area of a commercial establishment engaged in the business of repairing and rehabilitating watercraft while so engaged with regard to such watercraft. 2-3.03. Determination of Authorized Dock Use Area. Subd. 1. Generally. The dimensions of an authorized dock use area for sites bordering the Lake are determined in accordance with this Section. The authorized dock use area shall be measured from the point which forms the shoreline when the Lake is at elevation 929.4, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (“NGVD”). The authorized dock use area includes the area on, under, and over the surface of the Lake. Subd. 2. Length. The length of the authorized dock use area is measured on a line parallel to the site side lines as extended into the Lake and is limited as provided in this subdivision. (a) General Limit. The length of an authorized dock use area extends into the Lake a distance equal to the length of shoreline frontage of the site as measured at right angles to the side site lines as extended into the Lake. The total length of the authorized dock use area shall not extend beyond 100 feet, even if the site has more than 100 feet of shoreline frontage, unless otherwise specifically provided in this Section. (b) Commercial Structures – August 30, 1978. The authorized dock use area for sites with commercial uses that have a commercial structure that was in existence on August 30, 1978 shall extend into the Lake a distance of 200 feet. The lakeward extension of the authorized dock use area more than 100 feet from the shoreline shall be limited to the distance from shore of the docks in existence on said date and that portion of said docks more than 100 feet from the shoreline may not be altered or expanded. (c) Qualified Commercial Uses. The authorized dock use area for qualified commercial marinas, qualified sailing school, and qualified yacht clubs extends into the Lake a distance of 200 feet. (d) Existing Site – February 5, 1970. The authorized dock use area for a site in existence on February 5, 1970 shall be determined as follows: (1) Over 40 feet of Frontage. If the site has a Lake frontage of 40 feet or more, but less than 60 feet, the authorized dock use area extends into the Lake a distance of 60 feet. (2) Under 40 feet of Frontage. If the site has a Lake frontage of less than 40 feet, the authorized dock use area extends into the Lake to the point necessary to reach a water depth of four feet, measured from 929.4 NGVD, except that no such dock shall be located or extended more than 60 feet into the Lake. Side setbacks requirements shall be observed unless the Board issues a setback variance under Section 6-5.01. (e) Public Safety Docks. The authorized dock use area for dock facilities owned and operated by state agencies, Hennepin County, the LMCD, or municipalities bordering on the Lake and used exclusively for law enforcement, public safety, or LMCD purposes extends into the Lake a distance of 125 feet. Subd. 3. Width. The width of an authorized dock use area is determined in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision. The width of an authorized dock use area is less than the width of the site due to the need to comply with setbacks imposed from the side site lines. (a) Setbacks. The width of an authorized dock use area is limited by the following setbacks, which are measured from the side site lines as extended in the Lake: For that portion of the length of the authorized dock use area which extends from the shore: The setback from the side site line as extended in the Lake shall be: Zero to 50 feet 10 feet 50 to 100 feet 15 feet 100 to 200 feet 20 feet Where boat slips open toward a side site line, the setback provided shall be at least equal to the slip depth, but shall not be less than 20 feet. (b) Setbacks Doubled. Setbacks shall be doubled for all multiple docks or mooring areas and commercial single docks on each side where such structures are not located adjacent to another multiple dock, mooring area, or commercial single docks. (1) Exception – May 3, 1978. Multiple docks, mooring areas, and commercial single docks in existence on May 3, 1978 shall be considered nonconforming structures and shall not be subject to setback doubling if such structures are not expanded. The reconfiguration of the structure pursuant to Article 2, Chapter 8 shall not be considered an expansion. (c) Sites with 50 feet of Width or Less – February 2, 1970. For a site in existence on February 2, 1970 with a width of 50 feet or less, the authorized dock use area may be expanded to a side setback limitation of five feet, provided that such setback in no way impairs access to neighboring docks. (d) Canopies. Canopies must be setback from side site lines a minimum distance of 20 feet. 2-4.05. General Density Rule. Subd. 1. How Density is Determined. The number of restricted watercraft that may be stored at a site, which is referred to herein as restricted watercraft density, shall be determined in accordance with this Section and any applicable special density rules set out in Section 2- 4.09. The restricted watercraft density for a site may be increased if a special density license is issued as provided in Section 2-4.11. For purposes of this Chapter, a site is considered to be used for mooring or docking more than the permitted number of restricted watercraft if a greater number of restricted watercraft than are allowed by this Chapter are moored, docked, anchored, or secured at the site, for any period of time, on three or more calendar days in any 14-day period. Subd. 2. General Density Rule. A site is allowed one restricted watercraft density for each 50 feet of continuous shoreline. If the site has continuous shoreline greater than 100 feet and the shoreline measurement would result in the allowance of a fractional restricted watercraft density, any fraction up to and including one-half shall be disregarded, and fractions over one-half shall be counted as one additional restricted watercraft density. Subd. 3. Compliance with Density. No docks or mooring areas shall be constructed, established or maintained that provide space for, or are used for, mooring or docking a greater number of restricted watercraft than is allowed under this Section unless authorized to do so by special density license issued in accordance with Sections 2-4.11 and 6-2.13. 2-4.09. Special Density Rules. The number of restricted watercraft stored at a site under the general density rules may be increased as provided in this Section. With respect to residential sites, the homestead or non-homestead status of property for ad valorem real estate tax purposes has no bearing on or application to this Section. Subd. 1. Additional Watercraft Density. Unless a greater number is authorized under this Section, up to four restricted watercraft may be moored or docked at a dock or mooring area located on any site if all of the conditions of this subdivision are met. (a) There must be one, and no more than one, single-family residential structure on the site. If there is no residential structure on a site, any one off-lake lot, parcel, or other piece of property may be designated to be a part of one site by the owner for purposes of this subdivision if it: (1) Is legally subdivided and recorded in the office of the County Recorder; (2) Adjoins the site or is separated from the site only by a public right-of- way; (3) Is under common ownership and unified use with the site; and (4) Is occupied by one single-family residential structure. (b) The dockage rights at the site are owned exclusively by the owners of the lot parcel or other piece of property on which the residential structure referred to in paragraph (a) of this subdivision is located. (c) All of the restricted watercraft moored or docked at a dock or mooring at the site must be owned by and registered to persons who live in the one residential structure referred to in paragraph (a) of this subdivision. Subd. 2. Sites in Existence on August 30, 1978. Unless a greater number is authorized by the provisions of this Section, up to two restricted watercraft may be moored or docked at any dock or mooring facility that is located on a site that was in existence on August 30, 1978. Vickie Schleuning Executive Director | Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 5341 Maywood Road, Suite 200 | Mound, MN 55364 Ph 952-745-0789 | vschleuning@lmcd.org www.lmcd.org CONNECT WITH US From: Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 4:31 PM To: Vickie Schleuning <vschleuning@lmcd.org> Cc: Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Dock Ordinance Vicki, If you have any comments on Orono’s Dock ordinance for Big Island, I would appreciate them by Wednesday Morning. Thanks. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director City of Orono 952-249-4626