Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 2000 - December 2000 vitex Mee g0/26. i k 4,e . � � ` ' /fr `c)0 t J - Fig.tAtknot.1 - 412 0„41, c t*rte sv.o ,► o.s 3 op- fr 'W?fvc4,J G etrY &JA,'J G aF?O 20,/f A)010 17 F )e- Xsrp4 c..., 1-1-1-o(-4/ C4rY ppm I1040L 2iJo/t "7>Se 1.0z c I `/ 86 , 04470o revs owuT- e X 44 r y fitt4A)T 6. se-7--c) deel> ,r- A 70 1.^J/7-s ----747C44•81611040t1 lcwT � /t/Dii �0 = 71* ,cout /o uS/AiG -- s Post-C.7- R) /SUES T/ ffMAASeS Z-V4/14-774)� fr-f6PPCN67-A • Sti LY GeN `41- M TH Z4060-, * rel /NG l— _o/L)/r-"1-7204-(..c �� J�& -i• t%c o s /V .0 S S (41-Pt- 2 ti F,k'4764o\ ©FAQ 5Oc ;eDats-Afr'/VA-10ThU.. 4 PzIPki* , 4-06011,,,t A rgewfit mr/tkiuciri - P tgA)g - 4 f - /7 ioICS" -ak 7 /31Y-K- 1.460-PbvieiAJ6 rrite 6tottPda 7jPiC4014o(11 /5 g -/e) g. 5ilitowt,b sa7s/De -5P-44f-S /977 01\3 69tio � -� /1 FlEee I. DEC 2 0 2000 CI 1 1 ter utToivo December 14, 2000 . 4211A6_,- To: Mayor Jabour Orono City Council Orono Planning Committee Orono Planning Coordinator Subject: Rejection of Proposed Development— Brown Road & Rt.12 I am a resident of Orono and am a Sugar Woods' homeowner and taxpayer. I attended the December 7, 2000, Orono Council meeting and as a result am outraged that the Orono Council appears to be inclined to approve the monstrous condominium complex and office building proposed for the corner of Brown Road and Route 12. Anyone stopping at the Long Lake traffic signal and visualizing this three story "sea wall," stretched out curb to curb with all of the trees cut down, will agree that the proposed structure would make a very uninviting, unattractive entrance to the beautiful Orono area. This eyesore, which would be strategically sitting at the curve in the road, and up on the hill, would become the signature development of Orono. Its central position and imposing presence would be totally contrary to the goals and guidelines previously used to create and engender the Orono ambiance, which we all love and enjoy. I am certain that a mission of the Council is to preserve the beauty and rural character of this area. I cannot imagine that any Orono resident would think that the proposal as stated would come close to satisfying that mission. All of the Sugar Woods' residents invested in their property with a clear understanding of the existing zoning guidelines. I am not aware of any overwhelming reasons to motivate the Council to change the zoning in such a way to allow for the massiveness of this development. Senior housing would be a welcomed addition to our area. However, it appears that what is guiding the huge size of this proposal is the developer's unsupported profit w • I I . goals. I believe in enterprises making a profit, but not when they infringe upon, and degrade my own property value and lifestyle. Other reasons that you should reject this proposal are these: 1. It would significantly increase the already busy, dangerous and congested intersection at Brown Road and Route 12. A traffic signal erected sometime in the next 4-6 years will not solve this problem. 2. It would have a negative impact on the property values of all of the Sugar Woods' homeowners. 3. High density housing (17 1/2 units per acre) of this magnitude in this very prominent location would completely change the rural character of our town. 4. The esthetics of this massive building would ruin the beautiful tree covered landscape and be an eyesore that would highlight an obvious mistake in town planning for years to come. It was clear at the December 7, 2000, Council meeting that the developer has no intention to make this complex significantly smaller in size with much less density in order to fit in comfortably with the surrounding community. Therefore, please reject this proposal. cer- , 411 Illt. 7;, ,, ,I i f kel►� dI, 0 ' .semarie s over 2004 Sugar Woods Drive Orono, MN 55356 Mike Gaffron - Next Planners Meeting Page 1 From: "Matt Goldstein" <goldstein@ci.long-lake.mn.us> To: "Cindy Kirchoff' <water2@ix.net.com>, "Jason Osberg" <josberg@ci.dayton.mn.us>, "Jennifer Chaput" <jennifer.chaput@ci.arden-hills.mn.us>, "Loren Gordon" <Igordon@hkgi.com>, "Matt Goldstein" <goldstein@ci.long-lake.mn.us>, "Mike Gaffron" <mgaffron@ci.orono.mn.us>, "RLA Phyllis Hanson" <phyllis.hanson@metc.state.mn.us>, "Sarah Schield" <citiesl@hotmail.com>, "Sarah Smith" <sarah@wayzata.org>, "Terry Kayser" <terry.kayser@metc.state.mn.us>, "Tom Goodrum" <tgoodrum@ci.minnetonka.mn.us>, "Tom Terry" <tterry@n-y-a.com>, "Wendy Battenberg" <wbattenberg@orono.ci.mn.us> Date: 12/20/00 2:47PM Subject: Next Planners Meeting Season's Greetings! This is the first distribution list that I've created for the West Metro Planners group that has resumed meeting, so please let me know if there are people that are missing from this e-mail list(such as Gus Karpas). The next meeting has been scheduled to take place at the City of Orono City Hall (the street address is 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356) at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 1-24-00. No specific agenda or topic of discussion has been set at this time, so if you have any ideas about things you would like to discuss please let me know. Previously, it was mentioned that we should consider picking a regular monthly meeting time, so please bring your calendars. Reminders will follow after the new year. If you have any questions, concerns, or conflicts, please let me know. Good luck wrapping up the calendar year! Thank you. Matt Goldstein City of Long Lake 1964 Park Ave. Long Lake, MN 55356 952.473.6961, ext. 13 952.476.9622 (fax) City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 294-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19, 2000 TO: Frank Dunbar FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Additional Items for Review of Applications #2540/2541 Staff is requesting the following information to complete the subdivision and site plan review for the Orono Ambar, LLC. request. The next scheduled meeting with the Planning Commission is Wednesday, January 17, 2001 with a public hearing scheduled to begin at 7:30 p.m. ❑ Revised Building Elevations ❑ Drainage Area Map/Grading plan/Stormwater management plans ❑ Signage Plan ❑ Detailed Street and Utility Plans (including sizes) ❑ Lighting Plan ❑ Final layout (including curb cuts, parking, road and driveways Traffic Study d,(2. ❑ Landscaping Plans ❑ Trail proposal to connect east to west ends of property Ll TjSurvel DL D ?tom DR /"b s - 41414C 7 SEC. 10.52 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA. ®(4 u . . inimum Area. To insure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study,applications for rezoning within the study area must include a minimum of five acres. The plans submitted along with these applications must also include enough information regarding the effect of the proposed development on surrounding parcels to insure that the property can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Subd.2.Access and Circulation Plan. The plans submitted along with the application must propose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study.All public easements and road right of way that is needed to allow the construction of service roads and/or the expansion of Trunk Highway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. tg Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 Subd. 3. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Availability. The available sanitary sewer and municipal water capacity to serve the development of this corridor is currently very limited. Therefore, any plans to develop within this area must either demonstrate that it can occur ph utilizing current sewer and water allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems serving this area. If sanitary sewer or municipal water system improvements are proposed as part of the application, then the feasibility of providing this service will also be scrutinized along with an improvement financing plan to insure that the costs associated with t providing this additional capacity will be paid for by the development. \(•,- Z Source: Ordinance 78, 2nd Series Adopted: 1-22-90 Subd.4.Storm Water Management. Site Draii_lassialianust be submitted to insure consistency with the Storm Water Management objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study.Plans c1 will be carefully reviewed to insure both that proposed storm water ponding areas contain sufficient storage capacity and whatever additional measures are necessary to guarantee that the quality of CI q_ runoff from the site, meets or exceeds the City's standards. Subd. 5. Available Zoning Districts. Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that affect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area,applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development ORONO CC 359 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) L § 10.52 approach, outlined in Section 10 of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistency with the Highway 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: B-6 Highway Commercial District PRD Planned Residential Development R-1A One Family Residential District R-1B One Family Residential District M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District Any proposal which requires a mo ification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as Planned Unit Development. `'r Subd. 6. Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: A. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a) Face brick, or (b)Natural stone, or (c)Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative materials or texture, or (d)Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. I VI (e)Other materials as may be approved by the Council.Combinations iin 3 of such materials shall be permitted. u 2 4 u B. All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection till of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the .41 original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural L design and general appearance. CO S C. No building or structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent QL or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. �''r Subd. 7. Requirement of Development Agreement. All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of a ORONO CC 359-1 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 > 1 4 § 10.52 development agreement. Said development agreement shall clearly identify the timing of all of the public improvements associated with the development and the developers' financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall also include any and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance with the Special Minimum Requirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area,as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 SEC. 10.53. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Subd. 1. Authorization: Planned unit development authorization may allow: A. Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities. B. Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks,yard areas,lot sizes,minimum house sizes,minimum requirements,and other performance standards associated with conventional zoning, planned unit development can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics. C. Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility related expenses. D. Density Transfer:The project density may be clustered,basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. QE.District Integration:The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: 1.Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. 2.Mixed residential with increased density acknowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is r utilized. 3.Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. F. Applicability: Utilization of this zoning district is limited to the Highway 12 Corridor as set forth in the City of Orono's Comprehensive Plan Amendment#2 adopted May 23, 1988. ORONO CC 359-2 Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 i ta g § 10.53 Subd.2.Allowed Uses:Uses within the PUD may include only those uses designated on the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated in an ordinance and development plan. The PUD development plan N shall identify all the proposed land uses and those uses shall become permitted uses with the 4 la acceptance of the development plan. Any change in list of uses presented in the development plan will be considered an amendment to the PUD and will follow the procedures specified in Subd. 6 t. of this Title. Subd.3. Required Standards: For the purpose of administering this ordinance,the City shall apply the standards contained in the conventional zoning district that is most similar to the proposed development. In the event of mixed-use developments,the Zoning Administrator shall determine the appropriate underlying zoning standards, subject to the approval of the City Council. VQ Furthermore,the City shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and lki 01/4 purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses,the conservation of woodlands and wetlands,the 144 4k protection of health, safety and welfare of the community and resident of the PUD. To these ends, tt the City Council shall consider the location of the buildings,compatibility,parking areas and other V features with respect to the topography of the area and existing natural features such as streams and large trees; the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets and driveways;the adequacy and location of green areas;the adequacy,location and screening of parking t41: areas; and such other matters as the Council may find to have a material bearing upon the stated V1 standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. v., Subd.4. Coordination With Subdivision Regulations:Subdivision review under the subdivision regulations shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of the PUD. The plans required under this Chapter shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the 11 '1.. subdivision ordinance for the preliminary and final plat. Subd. 5. Revisions and/or Changes. A. Minor changes in the location,placement and height of structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. B. Changes in uses: Significant changes in the location, size, or height of structures,any rearrangement of lots,blocks and building tracts,changes in the provision of common open spaces, and all other changes to the approved final development plan may be made only after a public hearing conducted by the Council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the final development plan. ORONO CC 359-3 Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 t C.All of the provisions of this Title applicable to the original district within which the Planned Unit Development District is established shall apply to the PUD District except as otherwise provided in approval of the final plan. D.Review: If substantial development has not occurred within a reasonable L..., time after approval of the PUD Zoning District as set forth in the Developer's Agreement, the City Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district. It shall not be necessary for the City Council to find that the rezoning was in error. .... Subd. 6. Phasing and Guarantee of Performance. A. The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplished in the various PUD zones with the approved development schedule. B. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and for good cause shown by the property owner, the Council may extend the limits of the development schedule. C.The construction and provision of all of the common open space and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the final development plan must proceed at the same irit rate as the construction of dwelling units,if any.The Development Review Committee shall review all of the building permits issued for the PUD and examine the construction which has taken place on the site.If they find that the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater than the rate at which common open spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided,they shall forward this information to the Council for action. D. A letter of credit shall be required to guarantee performance by the developer.The amount of this letter of credit,and the specific elements of the development program that it is intended to guarantee, will be stipulated in the development agreement. Subd. 7. Control of Planned Unit Development Following Completion. A. After the certificate of occupancy has been issued,the use of the land and the construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures within the planned development shall be governed by the final development plan. B. After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, no changes shall be made in the approved final development plan except upon application as provided below: 1. Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing Q, buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are Ordinance 67, 2nd Series ORONO CC 359-4 Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 consistent with the purposes and intent of the final plan.No change authorized by this Section may increase the cube of any building or structure by more than ten percent(10%). 2. Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with the final development plan unless an amendment to the final development plan is approved under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. 3.Any other changes in the final development plan must be authorized by an amendment of the final development plan under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. Subd. 8. Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development. A. Application Conference: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for and attend a conference with the Zoning Administrator. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of his proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. 1.Purpose: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the City showing his basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: a) Overall maximum PUD density range. b) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. c) General location and extent of public and common open space. d) General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. e) Staging and time schedule of development. f) Other special criteria for development. ORONO CC 359-5 Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 2. Schedule: a) Developer meets with the Zoning Administrator to discuss the proposed developments. b) The applicant shall file the concept stage application ✓ and preliminary plat,together with all supporting data. c) Within thirty(30)days after verification by the Zoning Administrator that the required plan and supporting data is adequate,the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing. d) The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the City Council.Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten(10)days prior to the hearing and written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten(10)days prior thereto to owners of land within three hundred fifty feet(350')of the boundary of the property in question. e) The City may request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. f) The Council may hold a public hearing after the receipt ofthe report and recommendations from the Planning Commission.If the Planning Commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the City Council may proceed without the report. The Council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire Council. 3.Development Stage:Following general concept approval,if given, the applicant shall submit the development stage application and final plat. The application shall proceed and be acted upon in accordance with Section 10.53 Subd. 8(D)for zoning district changes. If appropriate because of the limited scale of the proposal,the concept stage and development stages may proceed simultaneously. 4.Applications:Ten(10)copies of the following exhibits,analysis and plans shall be submitted to the City: General Concept Stage: a) Preliminary plat and information required by subdivision Title. ORONO CC 359-6 Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 b) General Information: (1) The landowner's name and address and his interest in the subject property. (2) The applicant's name and address if different from the landowner. (3) The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. (4) Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD,including a statement of all legal,beneficial,tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified abstract of title or registered property report,and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject property. c) Present Status: (1) The address and legal description of the Property. (2) The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within one thousand feet (1,000') of the property. (3) A map depicting the existing development of the property and all land within one thousand feet(1,000')thereof and indicating the location of existing streets,property lines,easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers,with invert elevations on and within one hundred feet(100') of the property. (4) A Witten ctatpment generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. ORONO CC 359-7 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 (5) Site Conditions:Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at scale of one inch equals one hundred feet(1" = 100'). (a) Contours; minimum two foot(2') intervals. (b) Location, type and extent of tree cover. (c) Slope analysis. (d) Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands and streams and flood plains within three hundred feet (300') of the property. (e) Significant rock outcroppings. (f) Existing drainage patterns. (g) Vistas and significant views. (h) Soil conditions as they affect development. All of the graphics should be the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. (6) Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept including but not limited to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. (7) A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include at least the following: (a) Area developed to residential uses. (b) Area developed to residential use by building type. (c) Area devoted to common open space. ORONO CC 359-8 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 (d) Area devoted to public open space. (e) Approximate area devoted to streets. Approximate area devoted to,and number of, off-street (f) pp parking and loading spaces and related access. , L (g) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses. (h) Approximate area,and floor area,devoted to industrial or office use. (8) When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. (9) When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision J' that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. (10) Any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to °� property included in the proposed PUD. - (11) Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and 1" storm sewers. (12) The City may excuse an applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. (13) The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD. ORONO CC 359-9 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 Development Stage: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementations of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include but not be limited to: a) A final plat and information required by the City subdivision Title. b) Ten(10) sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet(1" = 100')(or scale requested by the Administrator containing at least the following information): (1) Proposed name of the development(which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the county where the subject property is situated). (2) Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. (3) The location,size,use and arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings,and existing buildings which will remain,if any. (4) Location, dimensions of all driveways,entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian;and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. (5) Location, designation and total area of all common open space. (6) Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space,including parks, playgrounds,school sites and recreational facilities. (7) Proposed lots and blocks, if any and numbering system. (8) The location,use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. ORONO CC 359-10 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.53 (9) Detailed sketches and provisions of proposed landscaping. (10) General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (11) Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. c) An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. d) A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. e) A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.t. drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). f) Preliminary architectural"typical"plans indicating use,floor plan, elevations and exterior wall finishes of proposed building, including mobile homes. g) A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structure, including mobile homes, and uses. h) Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. i) A preliminary plat prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. j) A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. ORONO CC 359-11 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 § 10.45 SEC. 10.45 B-6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Subd. 1.Purpose.The purpose of the B-6 Highway Commercial District is to provide a commercial district specifically tailored to accomplish the commercial development objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study Section of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2. Application. All applicants for a building permit in any "B-6" Highway Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3.Permitted Uses. Within any "B-6" Highway Business District,no structure or land shall be used except for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council: A. Offices (business and professional). B. Banks and financial institutions. C. Libraries. D. Motels, and hotels. E. Restaurants (Class I). Deleted via Ordinance No. 152, 2nd Series Effective Date: 10-28-96 Subd.4. Relationship with Chapter 10.53 Planned Unit Development. Other types of commercial uses and mixed use developments may be applied for through the planned unit development process. Applications that include commercial uses within the Highway 12 Corridor shall assume the B-6 District as the underlying zoning district. Subd. 4.1. Conditional Uses. A.Within any"B-6"Highway Business District,no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses except by conditional use permit: 1. Restaurants (Class I). 2. The following uses when such use includes a drive-thru condition: a. Offices (business and professional). b. Banks and financial institutions. c. Libraries. d. Motels and hotels. Source:Ordinance No. 152,2nd Series Effective date: 10-28-96 ORONO CC 351-1 (Sec. 10.45: 5-8-89) § 10.45 Subd.5.Accessory Uses.Within any"B-6"Highway Business District,the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A. Any accessory use as regulated in the "B-1" Business District. Subd.6.Area,Height,Lot Width,Setback Requirements and Design Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements and exceptions contained in Section 10.52 of this Title. A. Lot Area: two acres B. Lot Width: 100 ft. C. Setback - Principal Structure: Front 30 (35) ft. * Side Interior 10 (35) ft. Side Street 30 (35) ft. Rear 30 (35) ft. D. Setback- Accessory Structure Front 30 (35) ft. * Side Interior 10 (35) ft. Side Street 30 (35) ft. Rear 30 (35) ft. E. Setback- Parking Front 15 (20) ft. Side Interior 5 (10) ft. Street Side 10 (15) ft. Rear 10 (10) ft. Setbacks in parentheses apply adjacent to all residential districts. *30 (35) feet or 1 1/2 times the building height whichever is greater in determining front setbacks for principal and accessory structure only. F. Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing floods,erosion,or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans ORONO CC 351-2 (Sec. 10.45: 5-8-89) § 10.45 shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for approval. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. G.Height.No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75 H.At least twenty five percent(25%)of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. The following minimum sizes shall be required at the time of planting: f) / r Overstory Deciduous Trees 2-1/2 inches in diameter 0� Ornamental Trees 1-1/2 inches in diameter Coniferous Trees 6 feet tall if Major Shrub Plantings 5 gallons Gi ! V` .._.I.A11-trash-ash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principa �/, structure, within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure, or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessory structures are proposed, they shall be constructed of the same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. — ' J. Garages,accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. K. The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the urincipal structure. L. External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets,except at access points. M.The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. (Sections 10.46 through 10.49, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) (Ordinance 67, 2nd Series ORONO CC 351-3 Adopted: 5-8-89) RPUD Ordinance - 4th Draft December 18, 2000 Page 16 Subd. 6. Review of Application; Procedures. A. Concept Plan Review. In order to receive guidance in the design of a RPUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large RPUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following: 1) approximate building and road locations; 2) height,bulk and square footage of buildings; 3) type and square footage of specific land uses; 4) number of dwelling units; 5) generalized grading plan showing areas to be cut, filled and preserved; and 6) staging and timing of the development. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall address the consistency of the concept plan with this section. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall be for guidance only and, if positive, shall not be considered binding upon the planning commission or city council regarding approval of the formal RPUD application when submitted. B. Master Development Plan and Rezoning. Approval of a rezoning to RPUD and approval of a master development plan shall be subject to the procedures outlined in the Zoning Code for a zoning map amendment. The master development plan shall contain the following: 1) building location, height, bulk and square footage; 2) type and square footage of specific land uses; 3) number of dwelling units; 4) detailed street and utility locations and sizes; 5) parking layout; 6) drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 7) grading plan and drainage plan including 2-foot contours; 8) generalized landscape plan; ..� ' 9) generalized plan for uniform signs and lighting; 10) plan for timing and phasing of the development; 11) covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; and RPUD Ordinance - 4th Draft December 18,2000 Page 17 12) renderings or elevations of all sides of buildings to be constructed in the first phase of the development. Approval of the master development plan shall indicate approval of the previously listed items and shall occur in conjunction with rezoning of the property to RPUD. After rezoning of the property to RPUD,nothing shall be constructed on the RPUD site except in conformance with the approved plans and this section. The procedure for notification of and public hearing on the master development plan shall be the same as required for a zoning map amendment by this ordinance. C. Final Site and Building Plan. Approval of a final site and building plan for the entire RPUD or for specific parts of the RPUD shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this ordinance. The final site and building plan shall contain information as required by the city, including the following: 1) detailed utility, street, grading and drainage plans; 2) detailed building elevations and floor plans; and 3) detailed landscaping, sign and lighting plans. D. Substantial Compliance. The final site and building plan shall be in substantial compliance with the approved master development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: 1) buildings, parking areas and roads are in substantially the same location as previously approved; 2) the number of residential living units has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent from that approved in the master development plan; 3) the gross floor area of any individual building has not been increased by more than 10 percent from that approved in the master development plan; Ed. Note Items 2 and 3 need additional consideration per Planning Commission 4) there has been no increase in the number of stories in any building; 5) open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original design or intended use; and RPUD Ordinance - 4th Draft December 18, 2000 Page 18 6) all special conditions required on the master development plan by the city have been incorporated into the final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans . necessary prior to application for a building permit, subject to conformance with any conditions on the approval and subject to other necessary approvals by the city. E. Simultaneous Review. Applicants may combine the final site and building plan review with the master development plan review by submitting all information required for both stages simultaneously. F. Basis For Approval; Conditions. In evaluating a site and building plan, the planning commission and city council shall base their recommendations and actions regarding approval of a RPUD on a consideration of the following: 1) compatibility of the proposed plan with this section and consistency with the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Surface Water Management Plan; 2) preservation of the site in its natural state to the greatest extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general character and appearance of neighboring properties; 3) creation of compatible relationships between buildings and open spaces both on the site and adjacent to it,incorporating natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development, giving special attention to: a) an internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community; b) the amount and location of open space and landscaping; c) materials,textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior RPUD Ordinance - 4th Draft December 18, 2000 Page 19 drives and parking in terms of location and number access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 4) promotion of energy conservation through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures,the use and location of glass in structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading; 5) protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses.; and 6) such other factors as the planning commission or city council deem relevant. The planning commission and city council may attach such conditions to their actions as they shall determine necessary or convenient to better accomplish the purposes of this section. Subd. 7. Term of Approval. If application has not been made for a final site and building plan approval pursuant to the approved master development plan for all or a part of the property within a RPUD by December 31 of the year following the date on which the RPUD zoning map amendment became effective or if within that period no extension of time has been granted,the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of a rezoning,the approved master development plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. If construction on the property included within an approved final site and building plan has not started by December 31 of the year following the date on which such final site and building plan was approved or if building construction in a phase of a RPUD approved to be built in phases has not started within this period or if within that period no extension of the time has been granted,the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD RPUD Ordinance - 4"' Draft December 18, 2000 Page 20 application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of rezoning, the approved master development plan and final site and building plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. Subd. 8. Amendments. Major amendments to an approved master development plan may be approved by the city council after review by the planning commission. The notification and public hearing procedure for such amendment shall be the same as for approval of the original RPUD. A major amendment is any amendment which: a) substantially alters the location of buildings,parking areas or roads; b) increases or decreases the number of residential dwelling units by more than 5 percent; c) increases the gross floor area of any individual building by more than 10 percent; d) increases the number of stories of any building; e) decreases the amount of open space by more than 5 percent or alters it in such a way as to change its original design or intended use; or f) creates non-compliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. Any other amendment may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the planning commission. Subd.9. Exceptions.This section shall not apply to any residential PUD or PRD which has received preliminary or final approval by the city council prior to the effective date of this ordinance unless such is requested by the property owner and approved by the city council. Additional Topics for Potential Inclusion: - Phasing and Guarantee of Performance — More detailed list of submission requirements(such as in 10.53,Highway 12 PUD section) mr-c, w /Ng- 60 3D tA„,„-- pc_ - V2w /"tc 21 re. / cry J t-- eAY / >4440/4(7/41bfdtd,erttl 1/ o ?a /Op -S Ame- pew P / r -37-7) owsivoG (.1)" zttotA) ysisfer›.& ADA) (2-6-S g —M.oVIICtg rtv& 4 Cud' rF- ry - . el-z2 Pc_ eiNviAeAf (10u mac, 1/Uu , f- LiCT O ow-1,y y N 11° 'e--eiv1NG �, �/.' So f � . 'AJ OileVf Ars-tAe,,&r- e6.--1-( A,t4iv)17-7e5 &ftuegkcs-Atur — 2 /ev-ov4)*W A dettieeksj-c~- 1/" Alte-es Acmioff4eks 421L " 4,7/7-r-f "-<ewe4)12 r-vs 6,0--e-V/s-wb* cemetiTitt ert-Lp ? 640Uk 4.444-c_ te/Al dr t .r7 Cf ry / ,4- 6 " u vim/ 6 4o-lu-b l SS k. 02/2-4-071.11 401"111-11 f60 S t,t)v'Rr d- s , 7 3 o sr 7-0 AJo o 4 'mkt_ /444e-our Confirmation Report — Memory Send Time : Oct-25-2000 01 :02pm Tel line : +9522494616 Name : CITY OF ORONO Job number 036 Date Oct-25 01 :OOpm To 7633777089 Document pages 004 Start time Oct-25 01 :OOpm End time Oct-25 01 :02pm Pages sent 004 Status OK Job number : 036 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL *** — Cl� '32 Of ?i- c Yl O 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crysrcal Ray, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax.- (952) 249-4616 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Dale: f--e3.- S - To: a>0,14,-1 Fes: -7 — `7o S I ,Re: !P Po s�� p �l-c>Pic- T ~7— g,��w.v.74 Z Sender: -r...�t�_. IV YO IJ SHO ULD RECEIVE / PAGE(S), INCLUDING TI-37S COYER SI-ZEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (952) 249-4600. d14-l soV/�/ C_ �' Confirmation Report — Memory Send Time : Oct-17-2000 10:42am Tel line : +9522494616 Name : CITY OF ORONO Job number 892 Date Oct-17 10:37am To 6514565748 Document pages 007 Start time Oct-17 10:37am End time Oct-17 10:42am Pages sent 007 Status OK Job number : 892 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL *** c;;" CvtXOf C)J 71 O 2750 Kelley Par c-way P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax. (952) 249-4616 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: /e7 7— e /i Fax: /ea 5 / — j/ — y i� - oillor—AdR c-e=/q/aaOJ t"GST- gender: )1A YOU SHO ULD RECEIVE PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COYER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGE'S, PLEASE CALL (952) 249-4600. Con-Iirmation Report — Memory Send Time : Oct-13-2000 12:14pm Tel line : +9522494616 Name : CITY OF ORONO Job number 855 Date Oct-13 12:09pm To 9529381504 Document pages 007 Start time Oct-13 12:09pm End time Oct-13 12:14pm Pages sent 007 Status OK Job number : 855 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL *** • 461 .1c)- C) Cl t Of DY'OYlO 2750 Kelley.Parkway P.O. Box 66 CrySzvl Bay, NlN 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Daze: To: 53 2 --,e11---e› Re: � /"f3- til#"3 �'�t i+.�l-"!—� �i-r^'g,4�ff r�c.eQ iv F;e.ex ,-- Sender: )1A YOU SHO ULD 22.ECEIVE I PAGE(S), INCL UDI2VG THIS COVER SHEET. IF YC)U DO NOT RECEIVE ALL 77-2!E PAGES, PLEASE CALL (952) 249-4600. 5T7 A - S t T-s /S fru cam• t.S t CLN /.0•-> '7--tt- 't'2'- .__ r,i T D l=7'3 E y et.:2ez.1 . S S Ir�D-te-ice 4E� may!C� i.- 7D awe._ 42a=le�` . B.4Ic..£L/rvG ,dlA./`�� unlK.o Gm='a j 0 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 219 4) dimensions of all structures; and 5) the --location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. (Amended by Ordinance 90-589, 11-21-90) b) Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior materials for residential or non-residential buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings except those accessory buildings not visible from any exterior property line. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels. lc) All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash and recycling storage areas shall be enclosed with materials compatible with the principal structure. Low profile, self-contained mechanical units which blend in with the building architecture are exempt from the screening iA µ= requirement. (Amended by Ordinance 90-589, 11-21-90) 1) Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and substantially renovated structures. SUBDIVISION 14. LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS -.) Landscape plans shall be prepared - - - - - - other qualified person acceptable to the director of planning, drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: a) boundary lines of the property with accurate 61111 dimensions; b) locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads and other improvements; c) proposed gradingplan with two foot contour intervals; d) location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; e) a planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; f) planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 220 g) locations and details of other landscape features including berms, fences and planter boxes; h) details of restoration of disturbed areas including areas to be sodded or seeded; i) location and details of irrigation systems; and j) details and cross sections of all required screening. SUBDIVISION 15. MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. a) All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and ground cover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in conformance with the following table: Project Value Minimum (Including building construction, Landscape Value site preparation, and site improvements Below $1, 000, 000 2% $1, 000, 001 m $2, 000, 000 = $20, 000 + 1% of Project Value in excess of $1, 000, 000 $2, 000, 001 ® $3 , 000, 000 = $30, 000 + 0.75% of Project Value in excess of $2, 000, 000 $3 , 000, 001 m $4, 000, 000 = $37, 500 + 0. 25% of Project Value in excess of $3 , 000, 000 Over $4, 000, 000 = 1% In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in this subdivision may be ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 221 adjusted by the city to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this ordinance. The city may permit the seeding of areas reserved for future expansion of the development if consistent with the intent of this ordinance. • b) A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. _ c) All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 1/2 inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 1 1/2 inches. d) All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, patios . or similar hard surface materials shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. e) In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one and two-family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas except areas to be preserved in a natural state. f) Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. No required tree shall be any of the following: 1) a species of the genus Ulmus (elm) , except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm disease; 2) box elder; 3) a species of the genus Populous (poplar) ; or 4) female ginko. SUBDIVISION 16. INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING. a) All parking lots containing over 150 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the city. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 222 necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the "150 stall" standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. b) Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the planning commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the planning commission. SUBDIVISION 17 . MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan and which have died shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the director of planning in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. SUBDIVISION 18. RETAINING WALLS. Retaining walls exceeding five feet in height, including staged walls which cumulatively exceed five feet in height, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. SUBDIVISION 19 LANDSCAPING BOND REQUIRED. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this ordinance a performance bond shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the value of such screening, landscaping, or other improvements. The bond, with security satisfactory to the city, shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The bond shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to one full growing season after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept a letter of credit, cash escrow or equivalent in lieu of a bond in an amount and under such • 1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 223 conditions as the city may determine to be appropriate. In the event construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the owner and the surety. • The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. SUBDIVISION 20. SCREENING AND BUFFERING. a) The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision: 1) Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto located in -any business, industrial or planned unit development district containing non-residential uses shall be buffered from lots used for any residential purpose. 2) Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto located in any R-3 , R-4, R-5 or planned unit development district containing residential development at densities exceeding 4 units per acre shall be buffered from lots located in any R-1 or R-2 district. 3) Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet, and from lots which are used for any residential purpose. 4) Loading docks shall be screened from all lot lines and ""'~ public roads. 5) Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. 6) Outside storage in business and industrial districts which is allowed by other provisions of this ordinance shall be screened from all public views. ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.27 PAGE 224 b) Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3 : 1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. c) All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right of way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. d) Screening or buffering required by this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of this section. Height of plantings required under this section shall be measured at the time of installation. SIIBDI `ISION 21. GRADING, F L ING AND EXCAVATION. This -ectiozl mov_d from Seddon 3 0.27 to 300 28 (Relo - -d by Or. .na e 87-481 11-16-87 and Ordinance 88-500, 7-20-88 . ) CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway,P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 Phone (952)249-4600 Fax (952)249-4616 NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will meet in a work session on Wednesday, October 18, 2000 at 7:30 a.m. at the Orono Council Chambers,2180 Kelley Parkway,to review preliminary plans for a a senior housing and office proposal at Brown Road North and Wayzata Boulevard. This meeting is open to the public. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Posted at: Orono City Offices Long Lake Post Office Crystal Bay Post Office Navarre Post Office Confirmation Report — Memory Send Time : Oct-11-2000 11:42am Tel line : +9522494616 Name : CITY OF ORONO Job number 811 Date Oct-11 11 :38am To 9528900064 Document pages 016 Start time Oct-11 11 :38am End time Oct-11 11 :42am Pages sent 016 Status OK Job number : 811 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL *** • o� "moo Cl 1Y Of OY'O ri O 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O- BPs 66 Crystal Bay, 112V 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 FAX TE2f1NSNITSSION COVER SKEET Dater 'e) ✓,`O 0 Tor 1111 t GI+F-ee4 " �.__ Aleoler2olti 14,-S a Fax-- �,� .:✓ — = era. 4, Re: !"-ffidt.',‘" e4��!C 7—Z- Senders 4$14 h YOU SHO ULD RECENE PAGE'(S), INCL UDING THS.COYER SHEET 1'F YO U DO NOT R.E'CEI7-E ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (952) 249-4600. "7 - c— z•-fl -moo s yea -7— e• 8� P, --- f-'v 1�, 38-, 13, tet-r Tatik0 4A.3 ct>IJ 6, a ),a tip-- A-1__ -c S se'7 , 4f7 Q A'v1-01 r`"'a-C'`'`"' 70'"-ulz--_._ A PA-M-011--f 4-c4tog.s 9vtivk.pre___ etts lAp/U bAif/Plr iiepW y--Z -r-r) CSSu e iv 1 c-s Al\ff > --- oNoi HeN(Ag 14A— ILpry _ l0 Pv - ice J J v s i1ff 1? 70 RNlp- S10� = 2- ? r c 20 Lc.Ma x53ot) = I§ 37 /1 PO 0 \irlAn*/°'‘> i 6,(x c(3) a // 737 VS0 4 a� y37 ygv = fi/p--// �'g ... ... 40,x. ,/ 00 , , 1 CITY of ORONO 1 1 4 : fr /-' Al I: � �e ' r, !fir Municipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: \$zsii.o 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 October 25, 2000 Frank C. Dunbar, President Dunbar Development Corporation 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55422-5146 Re: Application for Proposed Development at Brown Road/US 12 Dear Mr. Dunbar: As we have discussed,the intent of this letter is to provide a format for the PUD application which you are making for the senior housing and office building projects on the Rebers site. I. RPUD District Zoning Code Amendment Status Staff has concluded that the zoning code amendment to create a new Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) District should be a City-generated amendment rather than developer- generated. To this end, we are structuring that amendment to be applicable to other potential sites besides yours,and have not specifically tailored it to your site. Therefore,the$350 fee you paid for that application will be credited toward your development application fees. The status of the RPUD zoning code amendment is that it was tabled by the Planning Commission after brief discussion at their regular October 16 meeting; discussed again by the Planning Commission rather briefly after our work session on October 18,with a few suggestions as to adding more performance standards; and will be heard again at the November 20 Planning Commission meeting, presumably resulting in a recommendation for approval. II. Application Format & Process Your application for the Senior Housing / Office Building project will be reviewed under the umbrella of the Highway 12 Rezoning and PUD process as outlined in Zoning Code Sections 10.52 and 10.53 (attached). This process is divided into a General Concept Stage and a Development Stage. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us . Frank Dunbar October 25, 2000 Page 2 The underlying zoning district for the Office portion will be B-6 Highway Commercial District as outlined in Section 10.45(attached). The underlying zoning district for the Senior Housing portion of the project will be the new RPUD District which will be codified as Section 10.33 (most recent draft version attached). Because the property is currently guided for commercial use,the conversion to residential use for the Senior Housing portion requires amendment of the Comprehensive Plan.Finally,the subdivision aspect of the proposal requires a platting process, to create two buildable lots which can be separately owned. III. Application/Fees Please complete and return the 2 basic application forms attached,and submit the highlighted pieces of information. Also, given the unique nature of this request and the limited applicability of the current City application forms to a PUD project such as this, the following fee schedule excerpts from the City's 2000 Fee Schedule will apply for your initial application for the General Concept Stage: Preliminary Subdivision Application $400.00 plus$30.00 per lot x 2 lots $ 460.00 Special Improvement Fees: -Proposed Public Road $900.00 plus$0.50 per l.f.x approx.900 1.f $ 1,350.00 -Proposed Storm Sewer System $200.00 $ 200.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $375.00 $ 375.00 CUP for PUD/Rezoning: Residential Portion $375.00 plus$40.00 per unit x 70 units $ 3,175.00 Commercial Portion $175.00 per acre($350 minimum) $ 350.00 Commercial Site Plan Review $250.00(plus consultant fees as incurred) $ 250.00 Subtotal $ 6,160.00 Credit for Code Amendment Application $ - 350.00 Due with Application $ 5,810.00 Additional fees you should expect when the application proceeds to the development stage include: Park Dedication Fee Residential 8%of Predevelopment Fair Market Value (Subject to min.fee of$3100/dwelling unit,max. $5300/dwelling unit per Resol. 4063 and 2000 Fee Schedule) Commercial 8%of Predevelopment Fair Market Value (Subject to minimum fee of$7250/acre,maximum$12,250/acre per Resol.4216) Final Plat Review Fee $225 plus incurred legal/engineering/consultant charges Document Filing Fees $200 plus incurred costs/charges Frank Dunbar October 25, 2000 Page 3 IV. Scheduling Key dates in the application process are as follows: • Public Hearing Legal Notice to Paper Tuesday, October 31, 4:30 pm Legal Notice Publication Date Saturday,November 4 Planning Commission Meeting/Public Hearing Monday,November 20, 6:30 p.m. Council Meetings Monday November 27, 7:00 p.m. (Council meets 2"d& 4th Mondays) Monday, December 11, 7:00 p.m. Monday, January 8, 7:00 p.m. We should discuss the feasibility of another work session with Planning Commission prior to November 20. Because there are only 2 remaining Council meetings in 2000, and because the Planning Commission does not meet in December, it is important that the Planning Commission have a high comfort level for the conceptual plans if this is to be reviewed by the current Council. You should also plan to meet with the Sugar Woods neighborhood prior to November 20. I understand you will be in contact with Ron Moorse regarding providing information for Rusty Fifield's review of your request for financial assistance using TIF. Please feel free to contact me or other staff members if you have questions. Sincerely, //X Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator cc: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Planner/Zoning Administrator encl. 09/20/00 11:41 FAX 1 612 377 7089 DUNBAR DEVLPMNT 1003/004 Application# Date Received Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Brown Road / US 12 Type of Application to be Filed Zoning Amendment Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 34-118-23-243058 APPLICANT Phone (home) Name Amberg, TIC Phone (work) 612-377-7090 Address 5000 Glenwood Ave., Suite 225 City Minneapolis Zip 55422 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address City Zip Date Property Acquired Under Purchase Agreement dated 9/13/00 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application $175.00 Residential Accessory Use $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments • $200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals x Other - see Fee Schedule _- Zoning lrrendu nt - $350.00 5 09/20/00 11:42 FAX 1 612 377 7089 DUNBAR DEVLPMNT Z004/004 - - - _ - 632 DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AMOUNT DISCOUNT NET AMOUNT ����,��,� INVOICE NUMBER DATE X - — \c\b0 -LOC 350 DATE CHECK NUMBER 632; BANK COMMUNITY ST DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FIR SAVAGE MN 553 5000 GLENWOOD AVENUE,SUITE 200 75-756 912 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55422-5146 no • PAY �� � S ckS rem DATE AMOUNT II • TO THE ORDER C '1 OF 11'00632311' 1:0912075661: 66 64 : -1 09/20/00 11:41 FAX 1 612 377 7089 DUNBAR DEVLPMNT Z001/004 .ids IONS 7��� r�G�fNi`�'���.���iy��,�,�nZliltS'i� kintitt II, l "s, .� ; rii�� ft tv �4Ai .,es:' "J-Y�».• i-s. "-1 y. -151.7-t7-----:!;i�?.7>.r�.,^' n;'!.-N�l:c r{Ii'' t'SASK}r..,� 4qg,4,....-.. ',_;. .).4!..,,..., Y':.i.-:,',...4•':,!,,,t.!;! ..<',.. :, `;i.�:^�''j K`. .4 . rT it- g 7SS:YrY : v t' ,..Yf "i.nn iar:�n . xl'�'b ..�:nsgiY,<. Date: 9/20/00 To: City of Orono Michael P. Gaffron Phone: 952-249-4600 Fax:952-249-4616 From: Frank C. Dunbar Phone: 763-377-7090 Fax:763-377-7089 Pages: 4 Subject: Brown Road/US 12 Enclosed please find a copy of the Zoning Amendment Application for Brown Road/US 12. Per your conversation with my office yesterday, it is our understanding that you would accept a fax copy by today's deadline to be followed up by mail with the original copies. 09/20/00 11:41 FAX 1 612 377 7089 DUNBAR DEVLPMNT 0002/004 AMBERG, LLC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Suite 225 Minneapolis,MN 55422 (612) 377-7090 September 19,2000 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Proposed development at Brown Road/US12 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Enclosed please find the General Land Use Application along with a check in the amount of$350. We are requesting consideration for a zoning amendment to allow for a 70 unit senior development and a 24,000 square foot commercial building that is not currently provided in the City of Oronos' code. After our meeting on September 11th,I requested Loucks Associates to complete a site plan. Upon completion, we will forward a copy to your office. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, 'r•. l C. Dunbar Chief Manager Enclosure LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SSOCIATES Date: 9/22/00 Planning,Civil Engineering,Land Surveying,Environmental,Archaeology Project#: 00-216 7200 Hemlock Lane,Suite 300,Minneapolis,MN 55369-5592 Telephone: 612/424-5505 Telecopier: 612/424-5822 I o: City of Orono Re: Browns Road North Apartments 2710 Kelley Parkway Orono,MN Orono,MN 55356 ATTN: Mike Gaffron WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA 3HR Messenger THE FOLLOWING: Copies Date Sheet No. Description 1 9/22/00 Preliminary Grading Plan These are Transmitted: p For approval a For your use LjAs requested ❑ For review&comment 1=1 Approved as submitted Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections JV AI, / _ Signed Bill Sharbono Engineering Technician DEC. 11. 2000 9 : 17AM EHLERS & ASSOCIATES NO. 6272 P. 2 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC O To: City of Orono From: Rusty Fifield w Subject: Use of TIF Date: December 11, 2000 The discussion of the senior housing project has focused on two broad issues: (1) What development is appropriate at this site; and (2) Is the City willing to participate financially in this project? As the City Council moves ahead with the planning process, the discussion will shift from concepts to details. This memo outlines some of the key details related to the City's financial participation and the use of tax increment financing (TIF). This memo does not deal with the specific dollar amounts of'1'11- and the City's participation in the project. These matters will be discussed in a subsequent memo to be provided for the December 18 City Council meeting. The City Council should include the following financial factors in the consideration of the proposed senior housing project. 1. Financial Implications: It is important to remember that City required adjustments to the project have economic implications. The frontage road and landscape buffers add to the project costs. The reduction in number of units eliminates income without a proportionate decrease in expense. These changes affect the financial feasibility of the development. At some point, a project can no longer absorb such alterations. TIF provides the means for the City to invest in the project to achieve these "public" objectives. 2. Need: My initial review of the project suggests that the use of TIF is needed for the proposed project to occur. The key to negotiations will not be if assistance is needed, but rather how much assistance is needed. As the project proceeds, the developer will be required to demonstrate the need for the financial assistance_ The statutory test is "but for" the use of TIF the development as proposed would not occur. 3. Use of TIF: The City cannot simply agree to give the developer a portion of the annual tax increment revenue. Tax increment can only be used to pay for statutorily eligible expenses. Typical reimbursable expenses include land, site improvements (grading, landscaping,parking), public improvements, and city utility charges_ The increment can also be used to pay interest on the expenses when the developer is paid back over time. This issue becomes more important as the need for financial assistance grows_ LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 3060 Centre Pointe Drive 651.697.8506 fax 651.697.8555 a„�o�iI! MN c,F111-11(1S rusty@ehlers-inc.com DEC. 11. 2000 9 : 17AM EHLERS & ASSOCIATES O. 6272 P. 3 Use of TIF December 11, 2000 Page 2 4. Duration: State Law allows housing TIF districts to remain in place for up to 25 years. The actual term of payment is a key element of every project negotiation. The developer will push for a longer term with greater assistance. The City typically seeks a shorter with less assistance and a quicker end of the TIF district. Each project is a balancing act. 5. Local Contribution: State Law requires that the City make a "qualifying local contribution" to the TIE district. The contribution represents 5% of the annual tax increment. The City must use its own funds to pay for project relates expenses. These expenses can include such items as streets, utilities, and traffic controls. 6. Bank Qualified Bonds: The project will be financed with tax-exempt bonds. The City of Orono may be asked to issue these bonds on behalf of the non-profit owner of the housing. The bonds are secured solely with the revenues of the project and do not create a debt of the City. These bonds do, however, count against the City's annual allocation of "bank qualified" bonds. Under federal treasury regulations,the City may designate up to $10,000,000 each year as bank qualified. This status results in lower interest rates for the City's bonds. The spread ranges from 5 to 30 basis points, depending on market conditions at the time of sale. It appears that the combined total of bonds for the project and bonds for City needs will exceed 510,000,000 in 2001. In response to this situation, nothing, (2) have the developer find another issuer : (1) doP three basic options the Cityhas p of the bonds, or(3) negotiate a"hold harmless" fee from the developer. 7. Land Control: The City has discussed the potential to acquire the site and lease it to the developer as a means of having long-term control for the use of the housing. Would the City finance acquisition through reserves or borrowing? Would the City seek reimbursement through TIF or from project lease payments? N,1Minnsoio\OAONO\T1Plx.u0121l,wpd a � 1 Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 12/15/00 ` \, Ertl " REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 8, 2000 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Paul Weinberger Zoning Title Zoning Administrator Item Description: Orono Ambar, LLC. 2060 Wayzata Boulevard #2640 Preliminary Subdivision/CUP-Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2641 Site Plan Reviews Existing Zoning: B-1, Retail Sales Business District Lot Area: +6.7 acres Application Summary Orono Ambar, LLC. has submitted an application for a two lot plat of a 6.7 acre property. Proposed is a rezoning for the two properties from B-1, Retail Sales Business District to B-6/PUD (for office use of the proposed west parcel)and RPUD/PUD(for multi-family residential use of the proposed east parcel). The intended use of the properties are a 3 story 70 unit senior housing project and a 23,000 s.f. office building. The proposed residential use of the property would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment as the property is not guided for residential use in the 1980 Plan or the proposed Comprehensive Plan(CMP). The City has a Highway 12 PUD procedure and a Highway 12 rezoning procedure established that provide the process the review requires. Issues for Council Discussion There are three primary issues for Council discussion as a continuation of the Work Session held on December 7, 2000. See the attached summary of Work Session discussion. 1. Site plans and use of the property as residential/commercial. Frank Dunbar will be submitting a new plan reducing the number of residential units from 70 to 62. 2. RPUD zoning district(this item will be discussed as a separate agenda item) 3. TIF financing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Provide direction to the applicant on the 3 items listed above. Staff will prepare a letter requesting an extension of the 60 day application deadline. ,r s r � List of Exhibits A Plat Map J LI Office Building Landscaping B Site Plan/Preliminary Lot Layout K L1-1 Senior Building Landscaping C Office Building Views L Section 10.52 Hwy 12 Rezoning D Senior Housing Building Views M Section 10.53 Hwy 12 PUD Ordinance E A2.1 Second Level Building Plan N Proposed RPRD Landscaping Req. F A2.2 Third Level Building Plan 0 Traffic Consult. Review I (11/7/00) G A2.3 Typical Building Plan P Traffic Consult. Review II (11/14/00) H A4.1 Unit Floor Plans Q Property Owner Notification List I A4.2 Unit Floor Plans PUD Process Section 10.53 is the Code section that defines the standards and review process for a Highway 12 PUD and Section 10.52 defines the special requirements for rezoning along the Highway 12 corridor and study area. Those Code sections have been attached as exhibits to this report. The applicant has provided site plans for both properties. A commercial site plan review for the office and senior housing properties and buildings will include a full review of the following items: 1) Landscaping 2) Traffic Flow/Road System 3) Parking Arrangement 4) Building Height/Setbacks 5) Review of Architectural Materials/Building Design 6) Lighting 7) Screening 8) Other I. Preliminary Subdivision/Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment Uses within the PUD may include only those uses designated by the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan Amendment had guided the property for commercial use. The Comprehensive Plan (CMP) as preliminarily approved by the City Council in September designated several Orono properties as areas that would allow medium density. The density proposed in the CMP does not have an existing zoning district that would allow the types of housing that would be offered by as proposed in this application. The proposed CMP did not include this property as a residential site. In fact it has been guided for commercial use as was the case with 1989 CMP amendment. The entire property has been zoned B-i since at least 1967,perhaps earlier. To rezone the east property would require changing the land use designation to residential. The 70 unit building on the 4 acre site would provide 17.5 units/acre of senior housing units at a variety of unit sizes and rental rates. A revised plan of 62 units would reduce the density to 15.5 units/acre. The proposed RPUD zoning district would be the appropriate zoning district to provide the units/acre density requested. Section 10.33, Subdivision 5(E) in the proposed RPUD district would allow the City of Orono to provide incentives to encourage projects which are consistent with housing goals. "Incentives may include modification of density and floor area ratio requirements for developments providing lifecycle housing and low and moderate cost housing." The City has the ability to ensure the housing need, for lifecycle housing, is met. The RPUD district would rely heavily on the CMP designation for housing density and the ability of the developer to meet the housing needs of the community. The office use would not require a CMP amendment as the underlying land use designation is for commercial use. The property is proposed as a 2.7 acre site. The use of the property as office/clinic would be permitted under the B-6 district should the Council approve an amendment to the permitted uses in the B-6 district to permit clinic uses. Platting Process This review is at the preliminary plat stage. A complete review of the preliminary plat will require review and approval of the proposed site plans. The plat would result in two lots. Lot 1 (west property) = 116,832 s.f. or±2.7 acres Lot 2 (east property) = 173,871 s.f. or±4.0 acres The preliminary plat review falls under the standard platting procedures as established in the Subdivision Ordinance. Additional requirements may be imposed by the City on non-residential subdivisions to protect adjacent residential areas from potential nuisance from a proposed commercial/office development including for provisions for a permanently landscaped buffer strip if necessary. Additional special requirements may be imposed to protect the residential areas surrounding the development. The developer has proposed to plat the senior housing project as condominiums. Each unit would have a separate legal description and tax statement. Under this type of plat the units would be owned by a non-profit agency and rented to the occupants under the agreements established for the building. Surrounding Land Use The subject parcel was platted as Outlot F, Sugarwoods the parcel immediately south of the Sugarwoods neighborhood. The only buffer between the residential use in Sugarwoods is a 40'wide platted outlot that is owned by the Sugarwoods homeowners association. Restrictions were placed on each lot within the Sugarwoods neighborhood that prohibits removal of trees greater than 2" in diameter within the rear setback for those lots located closest to the proposed development. The property is located on Highway 12 and the City of Long Lake is located south of Highway 12. Two lots that are located west of the project are developed as the Orono Shopping Center and Conoco gas station. U.S.Highway 12 is proposed to be relocated to the south and the existing Highway 12 will be turned over to Hennepin County. Part of the proposed Highway 12 relocation includes a change to the existing 12 and Brown Road intersection. Currently, Brown Road North ends in a T intersection with 12. The Brown Road south of 12 will be realigned to create an intersection with existing 12 directly across from Brown Road North and a signal light would be installed at that intersection. The property east of Brown Road is the Long Lake State Bank site, in the City of Long Lake. IA. Financial Considerations Briefly,applicant has requested the Council consider various methods of financial assistance to make this project feasible. Such methods include the creation of a TIF district or similar provisions or reimbursements. Council has had early discussions regarding this and has indicated it is willing to consider this. Rusty Fifield,the City's financial consultant,is preparing information related to Tax Increment Financing for the December 11 Council meeting. The information will give the council an idea of the types of issues to be addressed as the concept of using TIF is further pursued. This information will not include any detailed financial analysis related to items such as the amount of development expenses eligible for TIF reimbursement,or the amount of financial assistance needed to keep rents at targeted levels or to meet cash flow needs. This analysis will be done over the next few weeks. II. Site Plan Review (Lot 1 - Office Building) The proposed office building is two stories with approximately 23,000 s.f. of gross floor space. Under the building is a 21 stall underground parking area. The actual building size is 172' X 80' or 13,760 s.f The building is designed to step down from a two story structure to one story immediately adjacent to the Sugarwoods neighborhood. The building would be constructed to only expose the 80' width to the neighborhood. Site Characteristics,B-6 Conformity (Note: Needed variances are shown in bold type) Required/Allowed Existing/Proposed Site area: 2 acres 2.7 acres Defined lot width: 100' 195' Parking setbacks: Required front yard: 15' 15' Required rear yard: 10' 35' Required side yard adj. to "R" district: 10' 125' Required side yard adj. to "B" district: 5' 15' Building setbacks: Front lot line: 30' 190' Rear lot line: 35' 35' Side lot line adj. to "R" district: 35' 35' Side lot line adj. to "B" district: 10' 83' No. of Parking Stalls: Required= 1 per 200 s.f. Required= 1 per 200 s.f. of"net usable floor area for office/medical use" (Net=20,880 s.f.+/200 = 105 stalls required) Total stalls required = 105 Total stalls proposed = 105 Signage Allowance 190 s.f. Not known Additional Standards required by the current B-6 zoning district (Section 10.45): A. At least twenty five percent(25%)of the land area shall be landscaped with grass,approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. B. All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure,within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure,or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties.If accessory structures are proposed, they shall be constructed of the same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. C. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. D. The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the principal structure. E. External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. F. The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. *Note that the proposed B-6 landscaping/screening and architectural standards(application #2638) will be much more detailed than the current standard. The proposed standards have been forwarded to the developers landscape architect for this project. III. Site Plan Review (Lot 2 - Senior Housing) The senior housing building is designed with the same concept of stepping down to decrease the mass of the ends of the building from 3 stories to 2 stories. The building is designed to have 3 levels and a level of underground parking for 83 cars. One significant design element of the building is the clock tower,designed to break up the roof line of the building. The building is designed to have the east i/2 of the entire structure located 10' lower than the west 1/2 due to the existing topography. A MnDot stormwater pond is located at the northwest corner of Highway 12 and Brown Road. The pond is owned and maintained by MnDot. Developer has indicated this pond has existing designed capacity to serve both proposed structures as well as other existing/future development in the area. Site Characteristics, Conformity with the proposed RPUD zoning district standards (Note: Needed variances are shown in bold type) Required'mellowed Existing/Proposed Site area: 5 acres 4 acres * The RPUD district allows the Council flexibility to this standard when findings are made as listed in proposed Section 10.33, Subdivision 5 (A). Parking setbacks: Required front yard: 20' 45-50' Required rear yard: 20' NA Required side yard 20' 60' Building setbacks: The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD lot lines would be 35' except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. One concern is the building location being proposed at 56' to the rear lot line. The property is very limited by the MnDot pond for developing the housing further from the property line. One non-desirable option to allow the building to be located even further from the rear lot line would be to located the access to north of the building. This may not be the best option as a building would be a better "neighbor" to the residential properties to the north than a service road providing access to the buildings and a clinic. Building Height: The intent of the RPUD district is to provide housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and moderate cost housing needs. As discussed with the review of the RPUD ordinance, the housing types may require buildings to exceed the 30'standard that applies to single family residential homes and office buildings. The only district that could allow a building greater than 30' is the Industrial district which all 3 stories or 40'. The proposed building would have a peak height of close to 50'as viewed from the back side of the structure. Staffs determination of the defined height of the building averages 38'. Strict interpretation of the ordinance would define the height at 45', lowest grade adjoining building to highest midpoint of the roof Because the RPUD ordinance has not been adopted,no standard exists for building height in the district. The developer has stated to allow the project to work the building would have to be three stories or moderately priced senior rental units would not be feasible. No. of Parking Stalls: Required = 2 per dwelling unit (Section 10.61) Required = 140 spaces Total stalls proposed = 84 interior spaces 50 exterior spaces Section 10.30 establishes required parking for the M-6, Multiple Family Zoning District as 2 spaces per unit plus .25 spaces for each unit as additional parking areas for guests. A minimum of one space per unit shall be provided on the interior of the building. While this proposal is not subject to the M-6 standards,these standards provide a guideline for parking for a standard apartment building. The standards for a building designed for senior housing use may not require the same parking standards. The applicants have stated they do not feel all the parking proposed on site will be necessary for the use. They will be providing additional information as to parking needs for other similar projects to justify the amount of spaces provided. IV. Road/Parking/Access The property would have two access points. One on Brown Road North to serve the entire development and provide access to a future signal light at the intersection of Highway 12 and Brown Road. A second access point for the properties would be to Highway 12 for right in/right out turns. The City of Orono's traffic consultant has reviewed the plan and has determined the development would expect to generate approximately 500 vehicles trips per day (250 in 250 out). Both reports dated 11/7/00 and 11/14/00 have been attached for your review. A primary concern addressed by our consultant is the proposed interior road would be used for the clinic traffic as well as the residential use. The individual parking spaces in the lots located in front of the senior housing building would back out directly into through traffic. They have recommended a separate primary parking area be designed to not allow two sided parking to have to back out into the through traffic. When the original planning for the site was completed in 1988 it was envisioned that a service road would pass through this property to the Orono Mall property, Otten Bros. and connect to Willow Drive. The plan was completed many years prior to the final route of the Highway 12 relocation. A full service road may not be required since Highway 12 will be relocated and the intersection with Brown Road and 12 will be realigned and lighted in the future. However, the traffic consultant believes that many motorists would seek this service road route as an alternative to the other direct access drives to Highway 12 increasing the amount of "cut thru" dramatically. V. Grading and Drainage The proposed grading plan shows the parking lot in the northwest corner of the site approximately 10' higher than the adjoining property to the south. The City Engineer is recommending this part of the site be lowered at least 4'. The retaining wall could then be eliminated. Additional engineering is required for further review of the proposal. The developer should provide storm sewer and ponding calculations for review. VI. Landscaping Plans/Pedestrian Ways Proposed standards for landscaping are attached as Exhibits J and K. The applicants have provided landscaping plans for each property under review. The plans have placed an emphasis on heavier planting between the buildings/parking areas and the residential use to the north. The Code requires a screen not less than 50% opaque be located between commercial uses and residential uses. The RPUD ordinance has proposed a landscaping value to be required based on a percentage of the project value. For a development greater than$4,000,000 the minimum landscaping value that must be provided would equal 1% of the project value. Wally Case, the City's landscaping consultant, would complete an estimate of the landscaping value based on the proposed ordinance. Some of the existing trees would be removed to make room for the project. The plans submitted have been designed to protect several mature trees that are located between the proposed building and Highway 12. Protection of those trees requires the building and access road to be shifted to the north. An adjacent property owner to the north has expressed concerns about the location of the building being 40'from the rear property line. The Planning Commission should consider the option of shifting the building forward 20' to allow a 60' setback between the rear property line and the senior housing building. Shifting the building forward would likely require removal of the trees located between Highway 12 and the pond. If the trees are removed, it would make the building more visible to the future 12 and Brown Road intersection. This may be a more desired option as the building would be moved further from the adjacent residential properties. A suitable landscape plan would soften the impact of the building as viewed from the Brown/12 intersection,and perhaps enhance the urban feel of this area. SUMMARY OF DECEMBER 7,2000 WORK SESSION DISCUSSION REGARDING SENIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL There was general agreement among the Council Members and the residents in attendance at the work session that the concept of a senior housing development on the site is acceptable. However,there were concerns regarding the height and massing of the proposed building. There was substantial discussion regarding options for addressing this concern. The option determined to be both feasible and effective in reducing the impact of the building's height on the neighbors to the north was to eliminate the top story of the easternmost portion of the building, which is closest to the neighbors. This would result in a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 62. There was also concern regarding the City's ability to ensure the building would continue to be used for senior housing, both in the medium term (20-30 years) and in the long term. It was discussed that the City's financial participation (i.e., through TIF) gives the City control for the duration of this participation (20-25 years). There were two options discussed for maintaining control of the use of the building in the long term. One was the imposition of restrictive covenants that would require the building to continue to be used for senior housing. It is questionable whether the owner of the building would agree to such covenants, and whether those covenants could be extended far into the future. Another option considered was the City's purchase of the land. This would enable the City to control the use through a long term lease arrangement restricting the use of the land to senior housing. These options need to be further explored. Mr. Dunbar indicated financial assistance, i.e., TIF, was essential to the feasibility of the project. Council Member Kelley indicated it was his opinion the City should not be involved financially. Jabbour indicated there is agreement regarding the need for the project. The City's financial participation provides two benefits. First,it makes the project feasible. Second,it provides the City with control over the project, at least in the medium term. It was determined that the use of Tax Increment Financing should continue to be pursued. cgs) 19 up 0 . 4:111,V-------'---7Thm---", r Sr r 21I9Th P. .! .7 V _ri 2 121 g1 NNN Zs. 101...: (I) j 50, " F'l "3' (01 11) g Z; 201 51_1,____14,,., . 1,I ac'----27-13 39 IS i. ----713.rrton, 1311:11,. SO I 2 ' 17' ' 1 34414 Ye-' 141-01•49f-1' a M„,„ A a . " g ,,-. 4 2 1 40.4 I ..-. - 1'1 I (71 Si 1- S _ . 1 On IA ,.) . (?21 - I .. -.49 rr ,., 0,..3 54.'1 a 4 a•e. 1' S . 2 I .6er co.1- , . ... 4 : •••••••,..t.-5.io, . ... r., J t °,t• r; 3 .• 4 r• 0) :;•*;01.II t. . (27) ‘''• el S e . s ei el CM . (30 ';.1 7 p 1 ! (25) r a" TI an F. ,ep '' . ',,- 1 1, I I., i 11", , 3.01 01.12 01.17L01 4 s '42 %LW I 20 0 (/3) ' sqatg . E 1) I. i 4°5 7'N7301:3iTI 1il (2, - 370 4( •-• •.,_., • CV .197••••"•••• •• •-••••••• • ;. . , q12..: .,./ 2 L__17$ 50741E.' (24) 1 il ' 100 2 ,, -1.°P--Z99 ,-,',514.' ,,, -,. i 11. -4:-....,.., • .• • 'T----F---r-:E. a: ait : T 0 W N H 0 M E 5 .lktt7 r•-, _ \Mr),'''‘cte",::------‘—!_!tctx4:35 yr,74 PANCIL WA .• ,.. Z a) 17 / 13) s" . '4C 7--.126.ig --'•„1520, / / 1" 7---f--1 I fii-IS II.----220.2t---1,--,T--;.--,...!--------, / .„--..,,_ z ...-31' . 14,1.-v. , • ;..- , --,.,-,4„ 7 <,s.,,,,....f2. \ .. 2 I 6 li OM; (31) 't'....! 2 .....—rs .2;i7;4S- a S 4)2 4k,II +0 21.; ' 1 11r 1742 1 i ri• i .. v t_14:10.11-1".1.--f "Q) "2 2L Z2 $1 ( . 2 ils) 1---....2.r......:_.T.-221-42--- .Ts, ..; a} • C le . 2 1 ; • 1 1 's , r ,,..,,, . ••.. • cs, 9 OrylP 9 i ofi i,?, , ; -my 4- -=-,- -- .---x• 1 24 • 041 2 iie i i 111 oar ' • 1 341,1)4. on -•%.4.)‹.?4 ._ . \,,,il•k.1170f16 k A r, 2 'g 02) 24'.4.*.'-1,1, < '--'1'--1.A.! as 4 4 •S S 0 4 / •11., ;IV ' V' N S/7 144'1 • S•e MI IPN;C'C;114 i.V. 1 ten •i %, -2'1/-• 1-2 PM- _' v-c' , 2 so,A1 — l- C'‘ ir(-;',Fi 5 Fjo.;°' ' , •'' %/2\3 1 4 '30,1e......lri.2z4 eN\_,A141 -.... re, i I,7,.••t. ,5St itgicIiV,-.6.-'.... '. VI : , ,I\s ("I' t•as 1 • MI 1 . • I I 'Yr- , 14) ! 1 . ••,". I . A , : • ... .• 7 \\\ i •., _.! •.• _ _.•. . _ . _. _ ••••_• .. •: • . \.,• "-------------____. \ ._ ._. . ....,. ..__ i- ! .. ) S ... .... 4:.•‘,...7':'..I ,....:' .; . . . :: .'/ ..„... . •... '-.:: 2 '::.‘ : ....1. J... 4 n A 1 • •. ..• . ir.Z.......G.•-1.1" \44:4......,1f P. .11 / .'`a. G.' as j •"? :73.1 ':: ••••••• ._. • .1 t.!:\ ; ;::3••-•1- • • - . ..:-; :••:...-3 :'..,,,' ;9,...,.. .r..) .,-'• .., '. •-• , 1 , rz:Z.S.1 •-1:..:,....1..., . aiitiams- scaliell: . . Lrncvr o '� / cza❑ 'I XI d -I i Kt/ �rn� \1 elClZp m � S 02'19100" W -..11111.93' . ./"I''i i I r'i� -0 C 3 D y ��'f—S'PARKING SETBACK -r"�' //� 1 ��uu C —_ — �1�/ 1.•1 \ -I G1xi amnEj �� � �Z �..i f `� [.7 7173" 'Z'tJ t M _......„7,.."; m II Z N' I I i�+OLOl A i 1,:r:1------- (---•40 / ti)iv,-n a I n�vl y IL qv � I1.� 7 rr A' m ; y� Dr 1,) 4 \I\(- ,_ N I LI y {loaf-snit S u ` , -7-rief./6 r ,n o \u \ r�'a-�. \ `l r- \ ' Ail. i •4"1.5:1;,;:1,4,'.- a"V;.:Itt;;;4:'•:.'7.:::4.':-!-;:ixt7.,itted: itiN 1 lc..\\,-__---rlf ir: l'IIc �I. I7 Itisis — — -30' EULDINC S£TP —/---- — I I �� i 11\! t„...71 e� ..._. 01\''''.- r l 1 — p ,j `,� k ` i t, <e (1,1 �- - __---- ,_.„,15,r- - _2.7'0 ,.�, 9.1 71.) '{ ppCC I'y I\ .......uiv".." i '' a. \i 'k 1 pc.____ ,,,_____:...„_____2 t __. ill.,_ _ ) ! 1‘,,_/-1,,,e; 1\ ._____..,7 cc-r:\ .‘,,\, I. , 1 /---- .,riz__---- .-- 1 -4 ._.. I . ..,.. 51fQIz--ir........1,;----------\\ �`y13 I I I .'OQh _ 3 ■L4 SZ 0-S . �c� fj I � � , I 1 / P \i‘gl\N Q I‘...„...,.L.I-,...----- 'Pi-- / , L..._,, ,f\....„,„" :‘ I I,K.fpi7;11, 1-----N, -� ,_,_ Cut -•'. -.y M , 1! 111 \ \ 1\ j O IR•LI..-..-.--1:i1.----„„:1?------1:-"I r---- l-" A\ \_,.....,,,zi\, r, „.„,, i0.,.......,,,....,_____,_____ ...., . / ) kt\°•,.'.-- ------7-,1----- -lis-' I.-.--2:1"----1.*:7'. , ----- ' I \ ir...L...-1 ---,1 /---- (1 7A\ k j -... (.1. \ \hi, •-• ii, ''"---. • 24/1•L.., .."\\r \� .. 2 2 r•\ —0.10. \t„ N,, •-,-------------/ /../., \ • ,, . o an, .v_, / ..---N".1.----\ . 'N''''' .,..,. j / /Li ,//i 's. ::' 413.'1\ m \' "a w S-L1 1:}32�+ yy4 ti Jo49;;;14.C. 4 4 �t '% • 'MU" 51.83" � `` 6 �C -' H I1 If • . III -, Ill - - I ill 11 I II I 11 -T i , r i it 1� r 6' In j - 1 - 111 III ' 1 111 L.1 \ �l � �1N 1 1 , ill II , :,',,,- ..ff _ , ,1 1 , I In '1 I,. ► I I 1 ' 1 I ii n-j 01 CI II Ii i CI I � I•I a . - - • - •-• - 1 —1V--- III '8 --I 0 • til 0 1 lot m , • D3 () 1.., a / — 0— .1 • n .0 311E4) i 1 — i• II 0. M iii iml MI )01(1-1 in < AI .. 2 ID -4 6 mil 03 IIII 5 to tn A co Ell AI OE , —74 A MI ill col all cn Fr-- .._. HI DB i • OBI OBI III Po . ' 1 II EMI iu 0) Eli M mil CM 11111 loll SE i ri ' I •___-__-_—.' I' 5311 'ill oill , 0 ----- - < I› --i __, • b, .., mil 031 Ill 5 -6 z in 03 63 Z in . \\ \ I : ul 03 Isu r , I III 1111 • II11111111111 ) 0 1011111111111 • 1 6 / / I J ni::: 15 1:111 CE ! ! .--‘ i• ' sii / (-3 i I OH mil CU 211 -......-- /— - 1— ) , Ho 011 BE, 111111131111, '' SE VII IMO ink.1111_s11 III i- iiil all IIJB ni il 131 •to 4 s. 4 I. ..._ _. _ i_ir.___H _ •1 ill IR Bill 111 011! Dill DB o / mil illl E1111 Hii i 1 _I r u CM in • 3ID I; , (_-.) s Il! I-- 0.:..I. I\E I ! ) • °Z LE-BIT ' til till: • iy--• ' 1111 ED 11 ill ril ill 679ii pn , /I , 1311 1' • r- ii: in on ---1 ' T-1-- -- ' --4- .. ..[... ion Inn MU mil Dill LIB 4 _ III EMI bll III INIE SE , MN RBI MII - , II QM EM 1 no •, -1- 1 I -1Ill r SE •i 4 -s! Q , Ill mil III c 1, mil EMI mi ..1 ,s. i i OBI 1 6 ow 03 Ill z Z .] _ _.. 1 PA ON 1411 inia mil DID 411 fill I i Fill _ im. -( ; MIIIIININ H ‘1 1111111111 NE I --- \ in CBI in . I DiF1iI1111111141111 3 -- - m iN EH I . .11111*;111 P N C • 11111 III do -- —--'t.t2) 111 11111 ill 03 in r- in •: 111 0111 111 -6-t . Butes!nil . • z on up ti4pp ',. . la .--N • cm F1 0 1 I . o0 1 1 0 1.-.J.--0 o i r m m ,'.,. , r . TI • . a 0 J/ \� V / _ • . / T , - \\ . / 4V41% x N. 4* 'N .0 4 •,,,,, . XI K N 4/4,' .0/ Y/\\, / / 1 • \, 14,\- *. . 1 1 , p,x 477 , , A ,,,,, . :. - ,... fee • _ p •N. • /4 0 •74.,..1 7 4111101, • 2 fr A, N 4 'N , / p-NN:4 .. —„9, V pri, 4 / a 'x - V V P Oil- - 1 . :�, rr, Ill . -, iMI m I74 Ilk . L 1] II . SII'' I' I mil 1 C 1; 1;x[" 1Win.l '?I- ;� 1 . I a TtU �.— ! 1 1 m , m ! , • , ....... b 0 ti ll, i i-,il II ,,,,,,/ 22, .., ,ick",*' . r / m I ' �; r i a 1./ \moi - --' '0 0 +O e o i 'I co ;1 =Jr ,-- , +N :I 11111 4,4* -N) ..... - F., , 411**,, i7 ' k1 N'AN‘ /N ca Fl Z ^ ic. D N. i'l '.-1 / d74,1>`" 4 „ A 04. 7 ,* i re.:4 . , -4\4, ,./ 4 i 41p , ..... . , !,,, ,, N ,... Atifit .N, ,,,.,. ,,, p 'p N,37/4/ ,„-. c m % g \e!* \ • N il 416.., wit 4.11...N. 4,5,,,,o. ,,,- 4,,,,,, I 11.4111‘ A07 I ' \.. 11110.01 efir i , 4, ;40 c + 1 3 In C 1 m �i : 1 I Tf R1. 4 In i M L n II, r- 11 ' I � S / _ 1 • • 0 • il ...m. , g _ l� !�� m 'Ill 1! it _ fel 1101 aIh I m a - P _ 1 �:, , > ° Ali Z -.`I. .- NE:ti 1 II �e� 1_ 1, No:. ,. . . , K,,,, 1 1 _ ___,_ 1- • irN , 1 . ‘%' t siN, :107,,,, , -. , .t,„.„,, i ir / 4,4: _ -„ .,,,,qt/ - do,/ ., 44107 ,, , -4.•,.. # N., N.\,\,, 4 . 9 / , /(/* :4/10,,,to - , qa, „, 4 b, ', 0 / -•NzAk, . No, /- IV Ns • 1 / 4 N.,‘ • N . ,( /• j\> ' __, . •-,,,,, ,, .. .. • i[ki :fr'. N, tf'ci / 7'--• \,..4 / 61.. /- Itip," :"<" . , ' '1'../ 'N/ /41, 4*/ ''' , 1. ; `�'irt , 1! 1... 44./ ,fpyr* 'id*. ,fiCili I� Mr" ri 01 . 0 ' . ) 7 i; to II- L J n;-„,. 1 sii__ ___ _ _ Irk lit. 1 11111111 ' itillith iii r-- , I � , -----__._.—.--.—._— _. .. .. .._. _........... ..._.____. ._ ._..... . . • • ....4. HS , • z • - , , ••0,1 r . •A) co 4 6!'i .I ' , '4,7 4•1 n• Al —._ __ •1 I —,I4 i ,.... ,s -c 00 L.-..„ --,-- 0 \ ,.7 \ , r._._:„..,....,______A:„.....,...=.2.1_ ,--L=41___b__ ..__ _..-.. J 1 r• ? 1 I •— — —1 I I 4 ti 1 I _r---r--- T _I i . 'a: i I 0 4 6 -------- -- 1 I I 1 .47 _7,, ,.. 1 '_ _ _ _ 1 N.,,, . .._. ...... t,-, -- _ i ,. _ • . . . , n.) ...__. . ._...._. ......_. _....._. . _....._ ............. ........__ . _____ .._.___ • Z (p ) . 4 4.4 g ..i 41 I.i 1 — — —_ _ l• . `''. • ry 1. • ci., . ...L______.-- L__, — I 11 2 re . 0 ,....__ .: • i o , .1—___ i 0 A! vi... ---1... 11 I 2_______ _ ...\\ Li.; '''''—=1 ____L 0 \. —...11 I .. .. . . . ........... ........ .. .. . .........._............. . I --- ----- __----_=-- __ _ _.... .._ _ .... I - I _ - \ VI ....e. I en. wee — ne • —.....—..—_—..._s----9, o x Zt C -(. _.... —. ....... t Z I -it Ill a -- ; IN, . CO . X I 4 .•••--- z r ,, . --..... 4-1 . I — ..; Z ; WI A ' 1 - \41* / 0 4 / \' 7 7" -,. . 4444 . /I 6. z. :2 / _ / / ..../ ' • / • ..._... ____ .. .— ___ _y... -- - — _ J I A' • 0: I r: I ' ti* . •L I_____' - i , 1 Y c 0 , 1.! \ U U r a, . 1 -r 1 I . __ i[ i I __.___. 777_,.._._ rr= 0 i. IP ". • I. r) . I.. . .. L . 1 - 1. i-'''N I r 1ii ii 1ii I pi m 4 at �41 �„!A I , aay � 9 m E Ke 1 i 9 XQ d d l $ In 1 P.1 n 1.10‘lr o 4n a n n u r.,-, r r l z _ Z qi+l 71 Pn[lN q D D : 11 a v P.- N ^ Z , O �• • y.° gana q ^ 1t11D 7 PD D •-.. G) �11�.� ``Ommmine AO q 11 l P.S O 4 l 1 1 O 5' q 3 inl zZ I rill I 1 P 7 q C �N 1 0 N 4.N 7 1 .+ a� Z Vl VI -O z 0 0 m D T) C) Gj II'11111� ' N °aQ . `,NN H o , Cu r n o 0 0 0 0 3 o C 11=1. l lT 70 7 a 5. N 7 o l 10 -1 Y O a .a n C 3 -C =11c•-Z. 3.1 ;I:1 Q. q N P,p N ^ P p N /Nl N A• 7 30 f ; `OG 2 fl II}11 i q • l q C N P n O ^ p'1 = 7 P 7 r q 0 O _ ] [ D O C = C l q 1 7 P a�1 .� a N 9.0 Q P q P ° 7 Y r1 ] o N 3 Z (,1 N .. 7 N•q q[ P q aC q a N (1 v0 D 0 (1) ......... ....., wt n poll° OPi1q q N nCI .. AN .N-. D In N o L R 1,Al p D q P a P P q C 1 a C 0 j r1 l q ,. lax l 7 X N P ) P z; P C an D a P Raq N a ]P 1 -g S O ] rC N 01 7 P )(' O q V- q c q :1 ,+1 C 7 q q A 1 0 re D n 1 & 1 n 7 a P a ,, y� r Nf} R 7 A D,q n l 0 0 O� ] rt ] ii n u ] n o n V QV1 ff111 411 •P N CLC P q p O N p N uC]i ` n N ka{ 7 D . 7 N K [ 1 F�_ 1� N N p(?-4' P a P q p a n Y U N O j O r•1 D l l ""co) C lJ Ili 7 _1 n N a P y1� N N q G7 Na n n Za C II V P q tr q 7N q a N aP D q N ,Ol - ] 3 n 0. 0 0 3 rn PP!VII P• °<' a q q N 0• IP- 1 P a ] a `1 z- p D q0 a 141.1.1 :ret dol f/ rI m 10 P 5 ] l q n N rola i 1 1 7 _ 13 n P ri o II-f=lam' r • p n n q q-. a. 5. N 7 1:1 .o N ° ° n• °- 1111=1..�rJ 11[I 0 aII-11 p �.1• q a „,1- 1 fla i - n . A I al� 5.• P p <^N m a o P o et p y, 1■■I W IIln1 • q 1 y1 P P a N p q L y 17 7c ] 1 all .-I' � q m r ,� n n_ P o 7 n pp 7 1 ] P D FS-. •_I q P 7 1 �5 r P n 7 ' Z G. (.)'oo n D q — G7 n ^N N 7 n q P 1 q 1 7 q p [ O D 1 n NI al N N U U 01 O, UI 1 A l. (1„, n N . "' P U, U U I I • r",-,La P 'l aC 7 7 A] N 7 I CO l I O O m m 0 lI N b n N q q P 0a ] n R' 0 ('1 R. IZ a P o a Y P q 0.°g ,1+ ,+ N Cu Ol al O < q 7-4 q Nq O• 7 q 7 1 7 r_`;'. P a -< 5tn ♦ 1l ND n j P ,+ 10 q 7 P 11 11 aa ' 7 q a N ^— �_ P O, o ti a a P O1W .fir �r' Pr p IIIIIIIIIla ✓ ^^ N lq a mV a.P s ^ a q n 5• m R'O 4011 CD-0 N 3 �� / v 001 a I D 4R1- S , 41. ,,...„ ..,.,..„. •JJ_ -! o o �Ijil� U u ! _ a :Ul p _ I Vi a s I x �' a n o-s-"(i. ' R m 3 o o - C III v ° r D n a 0 r c n S ,I ,o om l�I:Ir — 01303s co om , R°c R'U0 ----- w((i) m° ��' 0 is, °n 41 ° I.° Lk I _ I I n _ 411 v M N o �r,�'� 0 ; S 02'19'00' W 188.93' r -5' PARKING p SEIBACK , --j- -I 1J� BI LIINI TIAC co I co . u f g m L- : I 1 �- _ 1 S 02'19'00' W 211.45' r 5'PARKING SETBACK J I - J- I' -JO' BALDING SETS.a .J . \\ m I u I E v CM I \ ` 1 II � \ 5 z Ed R n Z to J 0 E um I Oo 114a • ill r., ❑ 1 _— �� i ,18'001 Nj, 9. . .L4,4b .10 S ('�" .i:41,.. 0 0 0'p;) O VRiq ' :7` I aI J 0 .az I .vy : v Nr c , > . D o-{ •40 N •— CD 0 L -IP O 0 O Pr �+ I O • Z O .• ❑ . .. ,j, i I i i faSile.0— —1'42. ehli°0177" . G /4.1T IPM u *ti11T1TT app SZ v1 •%r 00 o Col 4lie ►1' 1,0,. 0 0 0.1 ,0041E 0 S 01' 1332` W O. I 51.83' e4ko''94000 OO'\ r/ \,� • /� p 1 • �. 1 1 L § 10.52 SEC. 10.52 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA. Subd. 1. Minimum Area. To insure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study,applications for rezoning within the study area must include a minimum of five acres. The plans submitted along with these applications must also include enough information regarding the effect of the proposed development on surrounding parcels to insure that the property can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Subd.2.Access and Circulation Plan. The plans submitted along with the application must propose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. All public easements and road right of way that is needed to allow the construction of service roads and/or the expansion of Trunk Highway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 Subd. 3. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Availability. The available sanitary sewer and municipal water capacity to serve the development of this corridor is currently very limited. Therefore, any plans to develop within this area must either demonstrate that it can occur utilizing current sewer and water allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems serving this area. If sanitary sewer or municipal water system improvements are proposed as part of the application, then the feasibility of providing this service will also be scrutinized along with an improvement financing plan to insure that the costs associated with providing this additional capacity will be paid for by the development. Source: Ordinance 78, 2nd Series Adopted: 1-22-90 Subd. 4. Storm Water Management. Site Drainage plans must be submitted to insure consistency with the Storm Water Management objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Plans will be carefully reviewed to insure both that proposed storm water ponding areas contain sufficient storage capacity and whatever additional measures are necessary to guarantee that the quality of runoff from the site, meets or exceeds the City's standards. Subd. 5. Available Zoning Districts. Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that affect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development ORONO CC 359 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.52 approach, outlined in Section 10 of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistency with the Highway 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: B-6 Highway Commercial District PRD Planned Residential Development R-1A One Family Residential District R-1B One Family Residential District M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District . Any proposal which requires a modification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as a Planned Unit Development. Subd. 6. Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: A. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a) Face brick, or (b)Natural stone,or (c) Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative materials or texture, or (d) Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. (e)Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. • B. All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. C. No building or structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement,tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. Subd. 7. Requirement of Development Agreement. All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of a ORONO CC 359-1 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.52 development agreement. Said development agreement shall clearly identify the timing of all of the public improvements associated with the development and the developers' financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall also include any and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance with the Special Minimum Requirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 SEC. 10.53. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Subd. 1. Authorization: Planned unit development authorization may allow: A.Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses,housing types and densities. B. Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks,yard areas,lot sizes,minimum house sizes,minimum requirements,and other performance standards associated with conventional zoning, planned unit development can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics. C. Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility related expenses. D. Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. E.District Integration:The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: 1. Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. 2.Mixed residential with increased density acknowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is utilized. 3.Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. F. Applicability: Utilization of this zoning district is limited to the Highway 12 Corridor as set forth in the City of Orono's Comprehensive Plan Amendment#2 adopted May 23, 1988. ORONO CC 359-2 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 Subd.2.Allowed Uses:Uses within the PUD may include only those uses designated on the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated in an ordinance and development plan. The PUD development plan shall identify all the proposed land uses and those uses shall become permitted uses with the acceptance of the development plan. Any change in list of uses presented in the development plan will be considered an amendment to the PUD and will follow the procedures specified in Subd. 6 of this Title. Subd. 3. Required Standards: For the purpose of administering this ordinance,the City shall apply the standards contained in the conventional zoning district that is most similar to • the proposed development. In the event of mixed-use developments, the Zoning Administrator shall determine the appropriate underlying zoning standards, subject to the approval of the City Council. Furthermore, the City shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses, the conservation of woodlands and wetlands,the protection of health, safety and welfare of the community and resident of the PUD.To these ends,the City Council shall consider the location of the buildings, compatibility,parking areas and other features with respect to the topography of the area and existing natural features such as streams and large trees;the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets and driveways; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of parking areas; and such other matters as the Council may find to have a material bearing upon the statzd standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Subd. 4. Coordination With Subdivision Regulations: Subdivision review under the subdivision regulations shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of the PUD. The plans required under this Chapter shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision ordinance for the preliminary and final plat. Subd. 5. Revisions and/or Changes. A. Minor changes in the location,placement and height of structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. B. Changes in uses: Significant changes in the location, size. or height of structures.any rearrangement of lots,blocks and building tracts,changes in the provision of common open spaces,and all other changes to the approved final development plan may be made only after a public hearing conducted by the Council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the final development plan. ORONO CC 359-3 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 C. All of the provisions of this Title applicable to the original district within which the Planned Unit l5evelopment District is established shall apply to the PUD District except as otherwise provided in approval of the final plan. D.Review: If substantial development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the PUD Zoning District as set forth in the Developer's Agreement,the City Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district. It shall not be necessary for the City Council to find that the rezoning was in error. Subd. 6. Phasing and Guarantee of Performance. A. The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplished in the various PUD zones with the approved development schedule. B. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and for good cause shown by the property owner,the Council may extend the limits of the development schedule. C.The construction and provision of all of the common open space and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the final development plan must proceed at the same rate as the construction of dwelling units, if any. The Development Review Committee shall review all of the building permits issued for the PUD and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If they find that the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater than the rate at which common open spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided,they shall forward this information to the Council for action. D. A letter of credit shall be required to guarantee performance by the developer. The amount of this letter of credit, and the specific elements of the development program that it is intended to guarantee, will be stipulated in the development agreement. • Subd. 7. Control of Planned Unit Development Following Completion. A. After the certificate of occupancy has been issued,the use of the land and the construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures within the planned development shall be governed by the final development plan. B. After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, no changes shall be made in the approved final development plan except upon application as provided below: 1. Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are ORONO CC 359-4 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 consistent with the purposes and intent of the final plan.No change authorized by this Section may increase the cube of any-building or structure by more than ten percent (10%). 2. Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with the final development plan unless an amendment to the final development plan is approved under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. 3.Any other changes in the final development plan must be authorized by an amendment of the final development plan under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. Subd. 8. Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development. A. Application Conference: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for and attend a conference with the Zoning Administrator. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of his proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. 1.Purpose: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the City showing his basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: a) Overall maximum PUD density range. b) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. c) General location and extent of public and common open space. d) General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. e) Staging and time schedule of development. f) Other special criteria for development. ORONO CC 359-5 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 2. Schedule: a) Developer meets with the Zoning Administrator to discuss the proposed developments. b) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and preliminary plat,together with all supporting data. c) Within thirty(30)days after verification by the Zoning Administrator that the required plan and supporting data is adequate,the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing. d) The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten(10)days prior to the hearing and written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten(10)days prior thereto to owners of land within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the boundary of the property in question. e) The City may request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. f) The Council may hold a public hearing after the receipt of the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission.If the Planning Commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the City Council may proceed without the report. The Council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire Council. 3. Development Stage: Following general concept approval, if given, the applicant shall submit the development stage application and final plat. The application shall proceed and be acted upon in accordance with Section 10.53 Subd. 8(D)for zoning district changes. If appropriate because of the limited scale of the proposal,the concept stage and development stages may proceed simultaneously. 4. Applications: Ten(10)copies of the following exhibits, analysis and plans shall be submitted to the City: General Concept Stage: a) Preliminary plat and information required by subdivision Title. ORONO CC 359-6 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 b) General Information: (1) The landowner's name and address and his interest in the subject property. (2) The applicant's licant's name and address if different from the landowner. (3) The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. (4) Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all legal,beneficial,tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified abstract of title or registered property report, and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject property. c) Present Status: (1) The address and legal description of the Property. (2) The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within one thousand feet (1,000') of the property. (3) A map depicting the existing development of the property and all land within one thousand feet (1,000')thereof and indicating the location of existing streets,property lines,easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers,with invert elevations on and within one hundred feet (100') of the property. (4) A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. ORONO CC 359-7 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 (5) Site Conditions: Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100'). (a) Contours; minimum two foot(2') intervals. (b) Location, type and extent of tree cover. (c) Slope analysis. (d) Location and extent of water bodies;wetlands and streams and flood plains within three hundred feet (300') of the property. (e) Significant rock outcroppings. (f) Existing drainage patterns. (g) Vistas and significant views. (h) Soil conditions as they affect development. All of the graphics should be the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. (6) Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept including but not limited to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. (7) A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include at least the following: (a) Area developed to residential uses. (b) Area developed to residential use by building type. (c) Area devoted to common open space. ORONO CC 359-8 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 (d) Area devoted to public open space. (e) Approximate area devoted to streets. • (f) Approximate area devoted to, and number of,off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. (g) Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses. (h) Approximate area,and floor area,devoted to industrial or office use. (8) When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. (9) When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. (10) Any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. (11) Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. (12) . The.City may excuse an applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. (13) The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD. ORONO CC 359-9 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 Development Stage: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementations of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include but not be limited to: a) A final plat and information required by the City subdivision Title. b) Ten(10) sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet(1" = 100') (or scale requested by the Administrator containing at least the following information): (l). Proposed name of the development(which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the county where the subject property is situated). (2) Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. (3) The location,size,use and arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings,and existing buildings which will remain, if any. (4) Location,dimensions of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts,parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian; and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. (5) Location, designation and total area of all common open space. (6) Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space,including parks, playgrounds,school sites and recreational facilities. (7) Proposed lots and blocks, if any and numbering system. (8) The location,use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. ORONO CC 359-10 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) § 10.53 (9) Detailed sketches and provisions of proposed landscaping. (10) General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (11) Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. c) An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. d) A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. e) A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.t. drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). f) Preliminary architectural"typical"plans indicating use,floor plan,elevations and exterior wall finishes of proposed building, including mobile homes. g) A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structure, including mobile homes, and uses. h) Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. i) A preliminary plat prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. j) A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 ORONO CC 359-11 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) N. Landscaping. 1. Landscape Plan Requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the City, drawn to the scale of not less than 1 inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: a) boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; a) locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads and other improvements; b) proposed grading plan with 2-foot contour intervals; c) location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; d) a planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; e) planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; f) locations and details of other landscape features including berms, fences and planter boxes; g) details of restoration of disturbed areas including areas to be sodded and seeded; h) location and details of irrigation systems; and i) details and cross sections of all required screening. 2. Minimum Landscaping Requirements. a) All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees.sculpture,foundations,decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in conformance with the following table: 8 Project Value Minimum Landscape Value (Including building construction, site preparation,and site improvements) Below$1,000,000 2.0% $1,000,000- $2,000,000 1.7 % $2,000,001 -$3,000,000 1.4% $3,000,001 -$4,000,000 1.15 % Over$4,000,000 1.0% In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development,the application of the standards in this section may be adjusted by the City to allow credit for such material,provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this ordinance. b) A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. trees shall be balled and burlapped All new overstory or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2V2 inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 1%2 inches. d) All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots,driveways,patios,or similar hardsurface materials shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. e) In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one and two family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas except areas to be preserved in a natural state. 9 f) Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. No required tree shall be one of the following: 1) a species of the genus Ulmus(elm),except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm Disease; 2) box elder; 3) a species of the genus Populous (poplar); or 4) female ginko. 3. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping. a) All parking lots containing over 150 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the City. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the "150 stall" standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. b) Parking lot landscape areas,including landscape islands,shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the Planning Commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall'be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the Planning Commission. 4. Maintenance of Landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape 10 plan, and which have died shall be replaced within three months of — notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. 5. Retaining`Valls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height,and staged walls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than 4 tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. 6. Landscaping Performance Security Required. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this ordinance a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering,legal,contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to one full growing season after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be appropriate. In the event that construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the awner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted,the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. 11 7. Screening and Buffering. a) The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision: 1. Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto used for residential uses at a density of greater than 4 units per acre shall be buffered from residential lots located in any "R" district. 2. Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet. 3. Loading docks shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. 4. Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. b) Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms,hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. c) All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot • occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. d) Screening or buffering required by this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of this section. Height of plantings required under this section shall be measured at the time of installation. 12 IjBonestroo Memo �a Rosene Anderiik Associates Engineers&Architects Apartments Project Name: Orono A Traffic p n T affic Review Client: City of Orono To: File No: 139-98-000 From: Bryant Ficek Date: 11/07/00 Re:Traffic Flow for the Orono Apartments The proposed Orono Apartments will be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highway(TH) 12 with Brown Road North in Orono,Minnesota. No development currently exists on this site. The current site plan, dated October 17, 2000, shows two buildings. One building is proposed to be an apartment complex with 70 dwelling units and would be located on the east side of the site,next to Brown Road North. The other building is proposed to be an office building with approximately 23,200 square feet of area and would be located on the west side of the lot. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' trip generation rates for developments of this kind, the following table shows the estimated traffic volumes to and from the site. Office Building Senior Housing Total Site Trip Ends Time Period In Out In Out In I Out Average Weekday 130 130 120 120 250 250 AM Peak Hour 30 5 5 5 35 10 PM Peak Hour 5 30 5 5 15 I 35_ Average Saturday 30 30 90 90 120 120 Average Sunday 10 10 95 95 105 105 As shown in the table, the site could expect about 250 vehicles in and 250 vehicles out of the site during a typical weekday according to the size and type of these developments. Site Access The current site plan shows the three access drives to and from the proposed development. The first access drive connects to Brown Road North on the east side of the lot. We would recommend aligning this site access drive, if possible, with the access to the bank and private homes on the east side of Brown Road North, creating one four-legged intersection rather than two closely spaced 'T' intersections. One lane in each direction on the access drive should suffice for the expected amount of traffic. From this full access driveway, motorists could continue south to the existing full access intersection of Brown Road North with TH 12. Motorists should expect delays at this intersection of Brown Road North and TH 12 due to the traffic volumes on TH 12. We would not recommend a signal at this TH 12 intersection since other nearby intersections in both directions on TH 12 have existing signals. The current geometrics at this TH 12 intersection are also adequate for the expected amount of traffic. Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36+ St. Paul,MN 55113+ Phone: 651-636-4600+ Fax: 651-636-1311 November 7, 2000 •Page 2 oft The second access drive connects directly to TH 12, south of the proposed site. At the location of this access,TH 12 currently has a closed median. We would recommend a right in/right out only access at this location, leaving the median_on TH 12 closed. We further recommend a short right turn lane be created from TH 12 into the access drive. By re-striping the existing markings with a short taper immediately • following Brov n Road North, this lane could be created without widening TH 12. One lane in each direction would suffice for the amount of traffic expected for this access drive. A third access is in the northwest corner of the site. Based on site plan drawings and field reconnaissance, we were unable to determine where this access leads. Further investigation will be needed before making a recommendation. However, we would not recommend this access if the drive connects into a residential area. Due to the high volumes on TH 12 and the likely delays for vehicles turning onto TH 12 from the side streets, it is likely that many motorists would seek this route as an alternative to the other access drives. Thus, the amount of'cut-thru' traffic in the connected area would likely increase dramatically. Internal Traffic Flow From the access directly off TH 12, motorists proceed to an internal intersection and are able to choose to go to the office building or the senior housing. This allows vehicle trips to and from each building without disruption of activity at the other. The access drive connecting to Brown Road North does not provide this type of separation. Motorists using this access to and from the office building would be driving through the middle of the senior housing parking, creating safety concerns. Correcting this potential problem would require changes to the existing site plan. Some options include: • Swapping the location of each building so the office building is on the east side of the lot and the senior housing is on the west side of the lot. Although this may result in the undesirable situation of apartment residents driving through the office parking lot, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building's parking lot. • Provide a separate drive aisle to the south of the senior housing parking. This puts the parking close to the building while allowing other vehicles to continue through the lot without disruption from parking activities. • Provide a separate drive aisle north of the senior housing building. Apartment parking could remain as shown or be shifted to the north side of the building as well. Either option would allow office users to use this drive instead of going through the apartment parking area. Changes should be made to separate the office users from driving through the senior housing areas. The access drive in the northwest corner of the site could have motorists from the senior housing driving through the middle of the office parking, depending on where this access leads. Although not desirable, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building's parking lot. As stated before, this access drive and its relation to the internal traffic flow should be re-assessed when more information is known. Pedestrian Movements To provide additional safety and encourage pedestrian movements, sidewalks should connect each building to the existing trail and sidewalk system, located on the east and south sides of the lot. This would allow people from either building another option to use to reach nearby land uses or for general exercise. Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul, MN 55113 + Phone: 651-636-4600+ Fax: 651-636-1311 Bonestroo Rosene Memo VI AAssociates& ates Engineers&Architects Project Name:Orono Apartments Review Client:City of Orono To: Paul Weinberger File No: 139-2641 _... From: Bryant Ficek, Tom Kellogg Date: 11/14/00 Re:Traffic Flow and other issues for the Orono Apartments The proposed Orono Apartments will be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 with Brown Road North in Orono,Minnesota. No development currently exists on this site. The current site plan, dated October 17, 2000, shows two buildings. One building is proposed to be an apartment complex with 70 dwelling units and would be located on the east side of the site, next to Brown Road North. The other building is proposed to be an office building with approximately 23,200 square feet of area and would be located on the west side of the lot. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' trip generation rates for developments of this kind, the following table shows the estimated traffic volumes to and from the site. Office Building Senior Housing Total Site Trip Ends Time Period In Out In Out In Out Average Weekday 130 130 120 120 250 250 AM Peak Hour 30 5 5 5 35 10 PM Peak Hour 5 30 5 5 15 35 Average Saturday 30 30 90 90 120 120 Average Sunday 10 10 95 95 105 105 As shown in the table, the site could expect about 250 vehicles in and 250 vehicles out of the site during a typical weekday according to the size and type of these developments. Site Access The current site plan shows the three access drives to and from the proposed development. The first access drive connects to Brown Road North on the east side of the lot. We would recommend aligning this site access drive, if possible, with the access to the bank and private homes on the east side of Brown Road North, creating one four-legged intersection rather than two closely spaced 'T' intersections. One lane in each direction on the access drive should suffice for the expected amount of traffic. From this full access driveway, motorists could continue south to the existing full access intersection of Brown Road North with TH 12. Motorists should expect delays at this intersection if this project is completed before MNDOT's realignment of TH 12. As part of the MNDOT TH 12 project, South Brown Road will be realigned to be the fourth leg of the Brown Road/TH 12 intersection. MNDOT plans include signalizing this intersection. Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36+ St.Paul,MN 55113+ Phone:651-636-4600+ Fax:651-636-1311 November 14, 2000 Page 2 of 3 The second access drive connects directly to TH 12, south of the proposed site. At the location of this access,TH 12 currently has a closed median. We would recommend a right in/right out only access at this location, leaving the mediarron TH 12 closed. We further recommend a short right turn lane be created from TH 12 into the access drive. By re-striping the existing markings with a short taper immediately following Brown Road North, this lane could be created without widening TH 12. One lane in each direction would suffice for the amount of traffic expected for this access drive. A third access is in the northwest corner of the site. Based on site plan drawings and field reconnaissance, we were unable to determine where this access leads. Further investigation will be needed before making a recommendation. However, we would not recommend this access if the drive connects into a residential area. Due to the high volumes on TH 12 and the likely delays for vehicles turning onto TH 12 from the side streets, it is likely that many motorists would seek this route as an alternative to the other access drives. Thus, the amount of'cut-thru' traffic in the connected area would likely increase dramatically. Internal Traffic Flow From the access directly off TH 12, motorists proceed to an internal intersection and are able to choose to go to the office building or the senior housing. This allows vehicle trips to and from each building without disruption of activity at the other. The access drive connecting to Brown Road North does not provide this type of separation. Motorists using this access to and from the office building would be driving through the middle of the senior housing parking, creating safety concerns. Correcting this potential problem would require changes to the existing site plan. Some options include: • Swapping the location of each building so the office building is on the east side of the lot and the senior housing is on the west side of the lot. Although this may result in the undesirable situation of apartment residents driving through the office parking lot, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building's parking lot. • Provide a separate drive aisle to the south of the senior housing parking. This puts the parking close to the building while allowing other vehicles to continue through the lot without disruption from parking activities. This will require locating the drive aisle a bit further south than originally shown. This will not impact the site any more than shown on the proposed grading plan. A sketch of this option is included with this submittal. • Provide a separate drive aisle north of the senior housing building. Apartment parking could remain as shown or be shifted to the north side of the building as well. Construction of this drive aisle would impact an area north of the buildings not shown to be graded on the proposed grading plan. Either option would allow office users to use this drive instead of going through the apartment parking area. • Changes should be made to separate the office users from driving through the senior housing areas. The City should evaluate the proposed access drive in the northwest corner of the site. This access could, at a minimum, provide access to the City's pump house. Pedestrian Movements To provide additional safety and encourage pedestrian movements, sidewalks should connect each building to the existing trail and sidewalk system, located on the east and south sides of the lot. This would allow people from either building another option to use to reach nearby land uses or for general exercise. Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36+ St. Paul, MN 55113+ Phone: 651-636-4600+ Fax: 651-636-1311 November 14, 2000 Page 3 of 3 Grading and Drainage The proposed grading plan shows the parking lot in the northwest corner of the site approximately 10 feet higher than the adjoining property to the south. We recommend this part of the site be lowered at least 4 feet. The retaining wall could then be eliminated and 4:1 slopes graded between the parking lot and the adjoining property. If the proposed grades are not revised the developer should work with the adjoining property owner to replace the existing timber wall with a segmental block retaining wall. The developer should provide storm sewer and ponding calculations for our review: • Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36+ St. Paul, MN 55113+ Phone:651-636-4600+ Fax: 651-636-1311 __,. ,Lit < . AI--1 .- • 1 . Ni V - - M 0• 4 H H a N •W S S Y U U o z Q H H H 0 0 H H FO. NN NN C MH N. 1 0NN C 5 •0 W W L N Z W W 0 N W o N. << H EL 1 Ni N. ZZ H MHF- I- a O 01 U. M .0 r4 CC .0 NC EE .0 NCX W .0 N 00 LA Ni 066 .0 w O > H it LA 0066 LA o CIHH LA 000 Z ui 0OHH ul OZHHOu1 C o JS M o HH M a XX M o HH M o I-►- o w U > M Ci 0 i CIZZC LA 0 0117 ❑ CJC Lel 0 U U 0- 0 0 J ul H 00 - > ul .t0HHQ LA H0 W W 0111 H0 W 0 L .I00M r-1 NN CO LAI N 6 J N 0 0 0 N O N 0 E 7 N O C C X Z N 0 0 0 I- CC03 3 CCO 2640 2 0.0 SI- F L NQ < 6 Ni 464 Ni C H H 0 NiC I- 0 MC ') 00 NiC N N I- Ni W I- N N W W< Z N < >> 0 Z N 6 cd H O Z N 6 < O Z N < Z Z VI Y N C>Y 6 Z 1 •} 23I- L t 0 3L t 0 ZXZ t 005 -1xn 1000 W t ❑ W WNL COQ < 0704000 07N6C 07 \ C a0 UUSJ 00 J JY .4332N W HN < w HN W < W HNNJ< W HN F- J .t4JJ6W H > X H 77C.DX H L04CDX H X 0X H OQuA < .i QQSY 1 L L 6 6 I 7 6 I E 7 6 I 0 _i. < I J J 1 > I > > < 1 < 43J 1 N VI NJ 1 HENJ 1 Hu10J 1 6< -I 1- 2J M OHH NiIn < 4 MNX MCO C < Pel SZZ W MCOZZ .0 JJO CD o E E t110 O ONO o SO0 r-100 .IJ M W W In H J J.0 Z H OO o Z H LOO Z .1 J 0 o Z H 0 0 o a O W W 0 Z cO NHH .i0 CO N =...H0 CON 0.10 - CON MHO ONUU .0a CO o CC .4O Pet O22NJ M 01`-I- NJ Mot-NNJ MOZZNJ M OZZ1. 6 MCILIONJ E W r N 0 0 U CC OO N J L us E W N N U O aJ 00 06QZ I- N. .0 0• < a Ni UU •0 00 oNCCH < I- to .0 HC .0 HCJ6 .0 NCNN .0 N CC CC CC .0 MNW WI- LN 0 al 00 in 00 LA 00 in OOWw LA o < ZZU CH 0Z Ni 0Ni o W W Ni Co EZ Ni 0 CO CO M 0Z337 0J u1 0 Cul OHHCLel 0 Cul 0 Cul 7000 U. NO ill H0 C3 LA .IOZZQUI .IO W WQLI H0000111 H W W I•- W Z N H C N 0 S N O Z Z N O N O N N E L N > .0 HC Z 21-20 2000 2 D 040 2 E E 0 NOOZ <.4 W M Z Z Z M C H F O M C U U O M C 0 Ni C 0 M W S S 0 1 Y Z N 3 0 0 0 Z N < Z H O Z N 6 O Z N < C C 0 Z N Q X Y O Z N C U C 1n F- 3 1000CE I 0 VIZ3E 1000043E 1 0W WXE 1 0 3E 1 ❑ NN WI) CO CO CCC CO NC CO C 07ZZC O7 od cd C CO ❑ 0 ❑ N W HCl <QZ W HNa < W .-I N77 < W .-I N 0 < W .i0 < W H600L ) M. H JJ 3X -10 Y H 0 Y H 0 0 0 CDX 007 CSX 0 0 W CO O F- I 06 I > 76 - I 0076 I 1 SS06 CC06 I 1 32 CO W C C 1 , 7 C J 1 N N J 1 C C N J 1 U U N J W W N J 1 W 3 Z E a W M O CO MN odQ M H66 M .O NN M NCZ 33 M CO CCC CL. o• UU 0o ENSU' o2S0 .0 H NM66 al (i) } 0 47H1-4o Z H7002 HUU0Z HLEo0 .-I HC9C.D . 0 oOOONJ C CCoOHOH F 00 0 • O N SO NHCO40 0 \ LA a O ON HO N 077 Za MO W W .0 J M o I-H NJ MOCCNJ MOCCNJ MOXXNO J MONNUME 7 0 U Z H Cl. W Z z Ls, S 0 0 J 0 0 J 0 N N O N Z CD Z < < U C 6 0 Z W CO N S 1INN0 1 111 J 0 0 N 011 S O CO NCC H o .0 H C = .0 H C S .0 N C N .0 N C U 6 N N W W N 0 in 00 6 ul o0 1n ( OJH LA 006Y .0 0 < ZZU O Z M 0 Ni 0 0 M o J U M 0 X Q LA o Z 2 2 7 111 0 CC 111 0 Cul OHZC ) 0 <N CM 0O0 C NO 1A .10 0 L .i0 < 0111 H00 <0 LA .IO F- 0111 .4 W W I- UP HC NO Cu N 0 Z CC NO C NO CO Ni N0ELN > •0 O F-S 2 Z0 5 < < 0 S VI 1.1. CI 20 0 NOOZ< H M Z J I- NiC 60 NiC CO N 0 NiC O NiC 60 MWSSO 1 N3O W OZ N < NHOZ N60 OZ NQ ta. ed O •- N< EHO NC UC111 IOOZ 10CCI2E 10• SO43E 1 CD 3L 1 0 C2 Z I 000 W 117 CO CHC 07 W C 00 C 007 edNC 0000d6C L CO000NF- H CO W 4 Z W H N J 05 < W H N 0 7 < W H N Q W H N E 6 H 6 0 0 C N H VICD3X .I S 0X H 0X .i JZCDX H = COX .I OO LU CO 0 < I 6E7 < I VIJ04 t J1u06 1 Oof/ 76 I 2301 WZ 1 C C C J 1 N J 1 J Ni ..J 1 H S N J 6 N J 1 W 2 Z Mo CO MCf` 00 MM od < M1 0U re) 0Y< MOCCC 0 1116 < CO 0 HPCD 0 OM LI 0 F-SCD .4< CO00 M6 < u1 V) 0 .O Z Z O Z H ed > O Z H 7 2 O Z H N W 0 Z H I- < N Z C O CD O N J \ 00 < 4u10 CO N < r40 ON < H0 ON CHO ON N .4O CO 077 \ ulCI. Ns MoI-F- •0J M000NJ M0CCNJ N) OCDCDNJ M000NJ 1,10NYUMZ N O H W C LU C LU C W C W C W C O C E 0 C E 0 C L 0 C E 0 C E 0 C E 0 W. 0 0 6 0 0 O Q C O ❑ Q C O 0 < C 0 0 6 C O 0 6 0 0 I- 11) 0 Z W 6 O Z W < ❑ Z W < O Z W 6 02W-0C 0 5 1 1 6 6 < > \ 6 Y\ 6 Y\ < Y\ < } \ 4 > \ 0 S C<W C <W C 4 W C <W C 6 W C Q W U a W a L a W a E a w a E a W a L a W a L a W a L 2 I- O Z x < O Z X< 0 Z x< 0 Z x < O Z X 6 O z x 6 O 4 C2 < Z C 26Z CC X 6 Z C X -Z C36Z CC 36Z C 03 0- 01- 0O F- 0O F- ao1 aot- 0- 0H or hml.1 del C ii Y r H0 1 LA M o 1 N H . O. . . w 0 0 Z4 a. F-• Ww s 3 3 Y Y x o O ri r♦ < < C. o n .0 f. 0 J J .0 H W .0 N WN LU 'C 1 o rri W 0 > Ul 0 > 3U1 o > in o > C O > 41 o> N C O J M 0 J 0 CD hi O 4 Ni 0 << ' rl 0 < M O J YC H 01J t -4 U1 CD 22❑t11 0 W 0` Ul CO O 1 4 -4 Ln M OO> Ln 1¢ LU un 14C M 1 < W U1 1 I-H N4H H H < JJJ NH LL> NHU W Lll NH > N<JJ 0Ll1 H W CS H CO ZLL.k4 Z > Lll Z < HJJ LI M4 < hi <U.U. hi H U.: MHCO < MH M <00 < NNC W }Z NNOO<Z NCD0C <Z NCD NCD } < Z NNUO H I } < 2 C Z 1 } H£ I C C H£ t C £ N I C} CO H £ 17.N N O w < w C N 4YY4 00F 2Z CoH W Z 0HC W Z OO <HH NZ ri333 W W .43ZZNW H > £}HW ri > 05CH £ H > W £ Hw r13CC W£ ri 02 H 6 < }Y H J (3X H < a' H - £ N0X ri CD CZ Z I Z £ YQ 1 00024< I N C < I C LUC.< I Cl) C < 1 HZJ 1 « UJ S 3J 1 JHJ Cr 4C0H 1 SHJ 1 MOUND MOHH < M1 W W MN01 } > MLIW U 4 MMU > P1 1.11 U. £4 N J J S C7 ,C H H 1 CD - N C CD S C o N ri Z CD NO 2 Z C_ r/ JJ Z O` 4<.CZ 141 ) UJNZ LAUZOO } U) MLUL() Z O2SON CON H h4 ,0 O NHHH0' O No 2NO NO 40' 4 No 3r10 NNOO \ MH M o33MJ NC0NrIJ no -) UU1J l. Oon ria P. 000Lt1J r` O7-1Ut1N W . H N >- 0 Z . W ¢ Z Z H O CD Z C H H W 5 < 3 3 H H o N H CO CD M 4 H N VL H .0 H Z Z H LU .0 N N LU .O M ❑ M £ N o < 0 L11 O > 4N o > Cl) o >CC o > U1 0 > ZUl C H O Z hi o .J H 0 O 6 M o J < r1 0 < Ni 0 J LA 0 J 0 W 1.0 CO C CD 41 O W C• Lt t9 0 0 < LL N N U1 M < C1 1 < LU Irl 1 C M 14 W Ln 1 HHJ it V) NN H r0 < CDQC •C NH U.> N4U W Ul NH > N4ZZ HC N 0 H =H M Z . U. < H > Ul ZZZ < H W W 3Z W MW O hi4NO3to MHLL M < Ca 4 MHZZ M4£ £W £ }Z CJC J Z NNOHW U1 CV La 0C4z NN NC.D4 < < Z NNHHH H 3 t ❑ Z Z I } C D C H 1 C C H £ t }£ GI 1 C£ Z H £ I } N V 7 > W CO O0 ❑ W °C 006 H> OD hi ZZ 00 < WZ OOHo ❑ Z CO .W W V) > W H6H W ria « W r1 > £ } HW H3 oa CH £ ri > JJH W r13» CDO C_ } r♦ h- CD Y r-1 C.Y Z H J0Y H 44 H LU W CD IC ri Z Z Z C O H I 0 C 0• < I C 4 £ 1 0 C Q I C W O. 4 1 U. U. CC 4 I H H H CD CC 1 01J Cr 07J 1 JHJ 1 QC Cl) H 1 HJ 1 Y D. W M CO J LL N M N ea ❑ M N oa } > M U1 W U 4 M U1 3 3 > M LA£ £ LU 0.. M W. 0 n .1 L11z N C 0 1C oN N CD 1 HJ } 0 o OPHXZ P 00 .05 1117W NZ OUZOO } Ul } }U12 oea nal O- h- C On o J O O N H <T O N O S N CO N N < C' < N C » N O N N M < Za Mo UUC) J No O. 0-unZ N. UUIJ nOo ❑ r13 1.... CD C90UIJ us CD.1"•) 4C £ 0 0 0 Z H 0- W Z Z W . s 0 W N N Z Z C C .0 H .0 Z 0 W W H 2 W N C1 01 Cr 3 C 3 U l H H 0 V) W W U1 N D. O Ul n .0 H H 43 L11 N C C Ln o 0 H .0 H W •C N W .0 MI J J .0 02 0 LCI 04 o > NUo LA o > 111 0 > Ln o > 442L11 O W M O Z < 4 04W < > Ni 0 <}} hi O < hi o J H H M C. W Cl) 0 C C W 2 C J LA W LU L11 U1 C)Z Z O U1 N Cl) UI Cr < <w2 1 SH ❑ Ul 1 <J.1WUl 14 W Ll1 1 LULU > Ul N N H N N 0O > £ N <CD N H W LU> N H > N 4CCJ Cl) 0 N C C 4 H 0 0 4 2 H H 4 Z C C < H 00 M W O M W < < Y M 4 < C H M H Y Y M H w W M 4 H F- 04 CC NC J Z N CmmCC NNSO < Z NCD < Z N0JJ < Z NNW W ¢ Z I CD £ 1 Cl W < 1 } NLLNI• £ 1 C22H £ 1 CJJH£ I } CD CDH £ 0 0 W oa C) o ea oa H 0- CO < D. T OOH 2 2 Z CO H H H Z CO <❑ ❑ < H< H W rl < Cl) .•13 £ W 4.0 W rl > O O H W r-1 > ZEHU r13OON W ri H ❑ Y r0 CO CO CO ri Y3 Y H '1 '") 0 Y H CD IC H COm } Y I OC O' ¢ I WH t } ¢ X< I C < I O0C6 I 44 1 OSJ 1 }}30 1 CJ30J 1 f/) NHJ 1 HJ < JJ-2J hi0JLLN hi00UJW O MMO Co MN4< > MU1SS> M0`W W CD M U. CD )i Z Z UI J r. C CD M CD H£ £ CD M H H CD .0 Z Z C CD O OedHXZ o0 ❑ N O WZL. OZ U100NZ UlHH U12 oWCD 0Z \ an JO0 O O HHL21H NNCOo 0 NO= SHO NO W WMO C4CJHHOO P. Mo U 00..4 M o NNM V) POCDJNC. J (. 0 1.-H1.1 .J I. o YYLC) J (. CDSCNJ N 0 rl LU C LU C W C LU C w C LU C CO C £ 0 C £ 0 C£_ 0 C £ ❑ C £ 0 C£ o W 0 o < CC0 C7 <Co o < CL' ❑ ❑ < CGn - o6C0 ❑ QC1C ❑ H L11 02W4 nZW4 ❑ ZW <- OZW < ❑ZLU < n2W 4 a a } \ < ›-\ - < ). \ < }\ 4 }\ 4 }\ CD = Caw cc ¢w C¢ W C< w z 4 w C o w U) o_ wa £ o w � £ awa £ o wa £ a wa £ dwa £ 2 H 0 2 X 4 0 2 X .2 O z X < o z X 6 o z x a O z X 4 0 < C x < Z C x ¢Z C 2 ¢ 2 C 3 < Z C 3 a z C 3 4 z C 0 C- CDH aOH 0. OH C. OH CL.OH CLOH • - - r r PO '�, tit ' H .. t a O0 1:'1.1 % ':•_ 'i 01.- Z 4 1. : CN a J a0 "....-, Ti 0 W -' \ H 4 h - .. W O] C o 0 N H 1 'c, a N WU .D / Wim _ W o Z LO •. C O FL I1 M '� :t .{ O WH C S N O UN N. 1 FHO N N H Z LL i•y�__ -1/4...-*. _ -r 1- . 4416.1 2 C N _ a W Z Z (([������]]]... N W W Z 1 Z Z W L J L ` W4 ZeO W t- /' WHH I ZZX44 c" - [`VrS J H W 0 ❑J rF c. UNF- M CO H O f.�y'--, v:v; '.V U= CO Z LU WI 0 _, - <H >> '\\ o W Y O W Z _ 1A77 N N O < CO - h00'JaNJ 47,77. _ A ZNCr ''''-I : %..2 W W O CC Ilk r-i n=x 4 a a c., } 4...k ❑ 4 W V CO WHO V wVZ W N 4 W Q a O Z N O CC HdtL O 4 W W LU Z O NL ❑ H F- H 4 CO 1- C J 4 H Cr, o U O } W ❑ 4 H .T W H Lit Laa.Z Z CO L N o >W C H o 4 ZH ❑ 0J NI' LU LLU4 : Z LO N H H C 0 .O F Z H O H w M H Q 0 3 I41 .2 0 a ❑ }Z N 0 0S W L[1 = H W W C O O H N0 > 0 I-4 Z X >- H W O LL rHi 0Yz < LL Z S Z 0 H t a a Z. 00 H W Y CCC a N J VI LL aLU MO C. 0 • J CC t.LIS } O. aJ LA Z 4 W CHL U a CC NoaLZ 0 CCZa. I. saLi1H00 O0 U Z H CI- LLI Z z _. W U z H 3 C 0 > 0 N. C ❑ N H - .O .O .O o > NU ❑ L[1 O UO CO o J W 4 > M 0 C Z Z M 111 S �S I.-. C:1 L41 1 ❑ HUl M N< 0 N C 0 0 H D 4 W U U M 4 4 C H M H N N= 0 4 Z NLN N C Z 1 } NLL. NNS 1 W 000 H 3 L W < .O W 2-I 0. H H C W r-1 Y 3 Y r-1 0 W Y I > < X < 1 J J H Q S Cr J 2 0 J S O CO L J o M N. 0 0 MPO 0 � 0 M 0 C 0 O O W Z h O Z O C C a Z • \ NNCOO 0 No -27 0 N. l's o0JNaJ t. 0 CCriJ N co ri CO C E 0 C L 0 W 0 ❑4 X ❑ 4 CC - 4:, ❑4 Z > \ ❑a 2 >\ 0 = C 4 W C 4 W U a W a L a W a L Z H 0ZX < OZX4 CC 0 sora- = ao1 = .1 Jol ).____ S n2°llQO° W 1gR 9 �/ tiw . \pr Oi8 vyz/--------q a_ pOO 91 r^-910 /-------°t7,o1:....--1 .it'O • 19 to c _ 004 y; Z ig w 00 IIP P a p .- 26 Cl/ \\•-.. . 900 J _ vp G = kl / r7--/j .t-------L7,......N.\\_......_.....1„ o: N 8 i\-_000 (arl \ \ \.* q . n, 44. O1 a N -A., Of _y1 07 OO a — D': OJ "00��� • 1.,_____s6" W �OZ4 gy0l�-: T . ° a/ ° 996 I6. 3 „L .10 S w.-4 910 'v N 7 j\'' .9., 9: J J '9Z �n m, co A /: 715P 4., 4\ oo '\ 000-.1�. co NI 06j \s,4,,, 9 9� NJ 9 CNr gNi 9� 9 W v 99 86 A 9A '8 s '8 9 •8:NN.-----.''"N_No �� 6d dy A«nxe Z9.r 9it._ 1 (N\ l s f1?•t�n" w ,as o s' rlo / o. '2;-7-7 S,PAR�C SETBACK ��30 Di C 11:71111W.: Nele N a •10 aA * czi .() :1 i y AO Al0 .i P) 004 _,i z !D:. 00 I 1 0 �u a u- 'p0 � 14 I ,....Z.:•• � m_ \-......_ 0 <0 N Ai- l0 e > r II N N 30' :U4DWG iirommillin N (n 8Will 8 ,i + o 7. 9) o ''-'' N ~ 141{m 4. ♦ N> co - \\....................._ O1 -1 WEL . 1024 m %-1 )157: .!„,.1:: . .,, pi_i . •• ____, ti. ;. c?, im• ,..... r, ' , .LO Oristm. s::. 3 . _agaido! S (4c1.41 lr 0 .V 9' y0 �i z j. 9g1.`..) ..c; i/ uLtHr".*1114 lir . Vj ,o. os ink:, 6`. . . :?IA r 0 ♦ . . \ \ IVI.LIN : • a4. iiiii* 9• 99N _ ' \s, •9V,, , , „ ,„.„, c99 a tpWo UW m v 4 .:,. 116, \ • S �.. -4 m -984 d• •- n CO C9,, .9S� 9 x m Z 2 n K B MI\ m o rn°��°r oo___Th $ •• • '32'�W 8•_ J°.eU/CO � 99? �0 ) • Y / n0 5O X89.2 1. NO¢pARkiNO 1../ tIO °r 012 i -- 6a--:, . ).- x` `S' I� wx e. to Kr 'LC) r iii °1.4r/I:11 ! '4111r.to A ;10 � 1 • Opo .: Nf c 005_ Mr*. 0 „ / 900 :3 `t:-. II rill/x cn Offp a �l Y o .00 N g Atitlyrigalpfil ~4. 0101 !w- � N . o& i • r .. 6 - II Y1, �00B�x mu 024 > p ,a. „, - :\ 0. ' tip N m L\ 1.4j \. c),,, Alai - . :i .L tokbahi 1 NM liw.- ..-1-0-z.. AMPS ="9' ''I'Kai 1M*4 1 3 „/. 1.10 S i.....: 2- 0;4' ' r 3 ^ / IJ I VINIELPIE �� -Id G I 9pJ Q r �- ""V „0Y, 0-n 9 ■, 0 II Nei o 06. i ilk NIrn f o0 WI oQm Is s° \,‘N 70,7 41111111110W- ; '"1111111114111111•1* 9,9 111 -44104 \ .'. ',itk\,,,,as VO\ N.K tO u g W • v a, t / r.` ( \ )012/ I' \ -_5..a2°L9II ' O=NL—_ 1/48 Q3' /1101 % r °o _- o, /- 1 s o%, e _,V. /. (/I . / ` //is NN /�-� Z ' C. / Z~h '/ 1 \ U N T.— -- / ....- 41' // f i. . Cf/ 11 ( \. p., T— "� I • vi—N.i,er/ — / I i it \ ,L, — 1 �� \ — i i /'I `\ . A Z 7'' ‘.-70044--. pp4 = g C....' f \ in o \\*-------^A u- \ /3��io 00' fir r /� i,. -_ - \ L. - _ f ____ ,,,.._,.... ___________,..\ N N ,.• D r N.', 011gir --i \ \ ) . // . - '. \ ,0I 071 1 I Ip p= low® l' N , .-- ^lam \` `\\�\ N �� A i 1 0/ \ °) ot)4-.5: � a `t �� ---', \ ��666� 5. it o N \\ \ \\o �0?ate ��8\� : v m ,------------j%„.. ) 2 8 9:\ \ 1f\ t',111 \ \?_-, \ s17.5 _____. \ � j/r \ � \ gJ `-.,______.,°.(1,8Z°::- ----------- -,Cc ZO / \ \I i � i 3 LS,ZZ,DS /j .,., ------\'996–� ' `I 16'004 \ •'' ! ,1 ‘,4 :in \ Ili , /1/ \\\ , \ 374, 1./. ( '9 g„, , / o.U MIS, • / ,� i J � , 1 sr oe. I <•C'k- 0 c.... ..s. , ° 1 e' er --y, 0 N \ \ \ JI9.. \ • r9a� \ .,..„..,,---.' \ ., I 1 \ 4#- \ . ' \,,9\ / ass f 2 Z ff x ,` �,• 'lq t If 1 n z c / 9Za �._ Vo..,:- S . • 32e` .`` :` , \ LoTh I, • mrn 51 • g1 ` \\ d , i 1 , ::.a -'/ / .8 \�. \\ 1 \ c v� / , 7.40.4-. O 0 CITY of ORONO �,', 11, r `, G�ti j Municipal Offices yk s',,:-,I, _40 Street Address: Mailing Address: _`4 rgg0 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 TELECOPY COVER LETTER Please deliver the following page(s) to: Name: Frank Dunbar (763) 377-7089 From: Mike Gaffron Total number of pages including this cover letter: 4 Date: September 15, 2000 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES,PLEASE CALL US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Phone: (952) 249-4600 and ask for Mike Our fax number is: (952) 249-4616 Additional Message: Attached letter re: proposed development at Brown Road @ Highway 12. Original and application forms to follow by mail. Please contact me at 952-249-4600 if you have questions. iI / Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us +f • 1 O 10 A 1 -'? CITYofORONO ', l;`al 11, 1ti Municipal Offices ✓;v,.. �� I " )` ca �.�G Street Address: Mailing Address: \$EggO 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 September 15, 2000 Frank C. Dunbar, President Dunbar Development Corporation 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55422-5146 Re: Proposed development at Brown Road/US l2 Dear Mr. Dunbar: As we discussed on Monday, your proposal for senior housing and an office building on the Rebers site poses a number of planning challenges for the City, in terms of requiring the creation of a new zoning district and performance standards. This is not in and of itself a problem, but the schedule necessary to arrive at final project approvals prior to the end of the year may be difficult. Your proposal will require the following applications: • `R c UD C©� . P c ) 1. A request for an amendment of the zoning chapter to create a ne zoning district to allow the proposed senior housing use. City staff will draft an amendment that creates a new zoning district with performance standards to accomplish this intended use. For the moment for discussion purposes we will name this potential district "MFSR" (Multi-Family Senior Residential).However,we are also contemplating a single new PUD district that allows both office and certain multi-family residential as Permitted uses. 2. A request for rezoning of the property. 3. A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the guide plan for this area from strictly commercial to allowing multi-family residential under specified circumstances, as a conditional use and most likely as a PUD/PRD. 4. A request for subdivision(platting)of the site into two separate tax parcels(and to eliminate the current Outlot status of the property). 5. A request for conditional use permit to develop the entire site as a PUD/PRD with MFSR as the underlying district for the residential portion and B-6 Highway Commercial District as the underlying district for the office portion. \ /� Dry r\._, Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us Frank Dunbar September 15, 2000 Page 2 A zoning code amendment to create a new zoning district could potentially be scheduled for a public hearing by the Planning Commission at its October 16 meeting, if you make application for that amendment by next Wednesday, September 20. The remaining elements of the application process (items 2-5) relate to the actual site and its planning. It is imperative that,prior to consideration by the Planning Commission,your application is totally complete and staff has had sufficient time to fully review all aspects of the application; it would be our intent to work with you to refine the application so that it meets the City's development requirements. It does not appear that it is possible to accomplish this in time for Planning Commission consideration of the application at its October meeting. If we push to get to the October meeting, there will, almost certainly be unresolved issues that will result in a continuation of the application to the November Planning Commission meeting. A preferred alternative is to submit the application as soon as possible, but to target the November Planning Commission meeting for consideration of the application. During the interim period,staff will work with you to identify issues and refine the proposal to address the issues. This process would include a work session with the Planning Commission in early October to identify issues that can be addressed prior to final application submittal for the November Planning Commission meeting. In addition,a meeting could be held with the neighbors in Sugar Woods to identify and address their concerns. This process would substantially increase the probability that the Planning Commission would be able to forward the application to the City Council for Council consideration in early December. To summarize: 1. Apply for the zoning code amendment no later than 12 noon on Wednesday September 20, to be heard by the Planning Commission on Monday October 16. 2. Apply for the rezoning,Comp Plan amendment,subdivision and CUP for PUD/PRD no later than 12 noon on Wednesday October 18,for consideration by the Planning Commission on Monday November 20. 3. Prior to October 18 and preferably around October 1, we would hope to schedule a work session with the Planning Commission and Council to identify issues and concerns,to assist you in making a more complete application by the October 18 deadline. Based on this scheduling, it would be feasible to have Council consideration of the preliminary plat and PUD at the Council's December 11 meeting. Lii , • L4L \ 1.1 1 . ' , 1 )5 \ ,, . , \ .... , . .. .„• ,,,Q.,.. , ;„‘ , ,,:tritA, ,, ...:_ . ri • el ) .. . 1 k • •(, ,• • • ,$,,Lft..ti • itilt 1 ? , 1 .. __\.-„. • ..,.•fettNt- ? ' ' i) i) • ' - ' .'4•••,--c,'",t .3 1 11.1' , ,, v. ' • I 4 \ ..1 °' 1 • ' 44' 't" - ..a V 3 . i , .,- .. I . r -•• ' .' VA s?j . • 031. 1.. „.:,...%...-‘ . V-1., ,, 4:•. .. • 1 : : • . sillAiii• r ,2-5,, :,..rpt'dr 147 ffi II Ire 3 ) $ .- • .1 " ,-/'-.4 ' •. .I'- -- '44k- -- , ..,,, ..•,..• „•••• ',.,.4•4. . . . -4 - , ''_- .'-i*''.. ,• ..:-. ' •_. : \ t ' • '.,'J. - - 41 ' 1 . 4 .'L-1'.' 4 : . ., If. : 1‘*. . ' .: • i \ * 1 i , PJ .k I ..)- 1. ' .'' . iqr. i/\ .' .) '11=--•', ,',4. ','.=-- H Ifi(A ''„..r.i, . 1' • .,1 .,I.I.A1,41Y,4J),litn#1,1.,11',h AA‘1, ; -,44 ' ' . 1. ,.it ',Iiie.t.i gr{,A•••'' ii:,gliitl;..1:111 I 1),1 i 4/ • ' L I\ • 'Ili., • r •-'...•. 44,9 . , „...,,,,, ,:, „,\\' v\ i , $ , , , .' f: ' - , ---., ... , .t;i. '. .'''•• '- . . ,i.?' L,4 "--!`l \ \ 1‘ . .‘i ':1 • : ..t. -11,.t, '41,! 1,. .‘ I,\ \ 1 ''\ :' 1r 1 , ,. 4. "4 \ •- 1K1 .:. ‘ \ \ . ''.•A 1 , I .11 . 4.-6444 lit ,i. '4 , .1 ,.1 ,1 -W % • \ 6 ' \ A• ' • - \ , ;1114 A •1 . I \...1 vl 1 -1' i I 1-111 •' .4 ,r •4. '.”. r 4'lr t5 ..' YirMii 7 ' . •.' '-' 1' ' • . Iv ..,\ :. " ‘, .t , 1 \ ,1 \lx,:a'Ailit\i. if ., . .t. ,C _ 1 --1- Va .., \ \ 5 4 \ \t r \ • I , ... '0• 1 .: F74€..-_,2?_37'..L:-..-,_'.L.-V'.....,- -141 1 Ili‘` ., -4", ‘;4. 4,-...yre---4.7,34=_ P.p.;./ ) r,. , •' , I .I+. .-4.1k.,14111:. .. , #01 10 -* — '\ \ \ 01 \. ,-, ‘-ri ,\ lt 0 1 4.... li.t •.A,..Utir An-aoll '\ \.','' 1 I ( . . •'''',... lc r ..it I",:V. ' ••Ar,r'.4ilitir:ri.-17.,,,•W-a' ri10 rr , i ••r-4 ,t.,, i,,..., ,c40 i .10 — ,\,,,,,, 1, . • . L 1= I ,.. 1 • ti:, '.i'.2', ,1111. ,,,..„. LI--,- • 'P.,744 q-L. 1 .,4.il , pl . ,; .:0:,.. _ ,. .:, y ,114".• 1. itl::h Ilf . I :,,, . • I I *N..1•.. i7---1.-...-.1‘i4AW;;741 -ri - , ,-6 ,,j1ktitrii alw i' h l e ' - ' ,r if • id - , , . it . • ' . . 1 ''• . -•''— 1°0 . ER. 11.%.,121-.- .;;; .fl,i joi :,,,c,._ ..i ,,,i,„ ., ...Tfrfirt-i_-_iv, \et fro ',s • FFd -, 1 : p/.--.--li Pltz,!N.F,-.-- . . .. ,,, io it,tta.....„_sk,lai„,„'7A - if:3+..•, , I ,, , -.•, -. g q!...;.•,t ..-,‘,.:1 ‘r..,i.'7:ra 0;iy. le,:• i ., .._ 1 11 ,,.i. ki11.1 die. ,, 1 * p,,,,', / il ,— ; i#1,. • - , 1 1 " .., 't, ." f,i. a'i :II,N .. gli,..0; IL` 1 s'i-I • ' '' j 11'i , ..: ' '11N,,. • -' 0 l••‘ 141- r ill .--,.Thr r (-ZS , 1 r ; i Iii .„;...,*ii 0 41.4...1..„..... , i i . , ',Il I I' I rill P' 'ft .1 i ......A.- ...'2. t.%ia.... I I ,''S f I 1 ( ' .. • -.A,' • ' ' \ ' \:. . , ‘,..,,, .st_.,,,.. ., , , k.,. °it 1 ,' ., . j)-im �J/�J����~- - ' '_ - -~ / _ ~- — ._7 .� / « ._ __/ / /~ ��� ^ � / �Tywuca`~~� / ( �»c�� e,&,t) 1,5;1 (4/-:\.,) a:---F-rc--- -X47\i' - (4it-NA-s DA) 7-42.cyee-t_t_ IIi( 4,44,0,L — c2-1•-).__ ___c_ . 11 - _ opAop-o.s/A5 asy/tioaie) p-Lkes 2 s-7mistrg-z- , fl' (a_ r---3(2-tcs wat.e.e.4. ive .,, t/ ,(__,,t,fe_ F0,07---f,e,4_,-7--) II II . 5 -.64 vf4T .___ 11 c -\N ,, . ‘ . ____., Tv 1111 la 11 li )2--- "3 0—?:, ,/,)w:),::- ser H5PO4, - -- 0,./5,04,,,,,,r„ ,,,:,,,„t_,,, 're_ ,1-1.4-5t,i7 _ iq bt•-- .3-g—?: 446 ,t..a ___TY/P, 7 2- '6,0,-- t 4.4 r9- ° ? 45 ietz,-;) - //c707,44,t, I - (trim,- 1 ST,1) tr---t-w - . r)( '' ?) ii _ ___ ---- ^ ` -- UK ----' =� -----------------------' -------�— ----------- - _� - -^ .�_ -~ / 151Q" 03 / pp m 2ecp eietk,s- (-32 'O I/L./ N1®1 2 0 PPS 8 did X 5 o = +. � )‹. 3 , o etot.i Pig / Yevtl-' i„,,k , E k /-# 5 ÷ `It Z 4 1 c Q o. i % : 0 a) _, 0 w r _..., ,7. _. �.�+� .. _. r [ .TON peow LTMOig • N,.. • . C I 71 to o •FA c x 4 1 • 1 . 7. .rC.4M,� 1 1 1 _j ct I ) •1 .11 1 i I W r L1-o \ 1 d , ' n o c;f 1— l rc7 t >) c 1, 'r ck\ i-Alimi_Aez_ A siN 3 'J N. ‘41 rN s --N-1\ 1 r3-13 5, -t\ a\\> S' -7 c‘N _,; 1 1 A r % I , Dunbar Development Corporation April 6, 1999 Mr. Gabriel Gabbour West Photo 21 University Avenue NE Minneapolis MN 55413 Dear Gabriel: Thank you for the opportunity to get together to learn about your activities and the housing needs for seniors in Orono. Enclosed are pictures of recent developments we have done in and around the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. Sincerely, _Oeg Frank C. Dunbar President Enclosures 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55422-5146 (612)377-7090 FAX(612)377-7089 ...., 11111 • I I • r..._, 1 I It I ...! 'ill!! CCZ •!i1,7, 0 1. 0 EVZ cc MI 1 •• LIJOUZI,u . , !! ! ! --Icntu—z gR .: I j —I z 03 cE z •2 =III 0 0 g I—cc !'••; i Iiii:i i ! C°111 IT 11J : :';.•'..''..-.', 1111(I'/I 03 c) F4!gilylfrj!' ,. !• 1 x w< 1.— C. 5,11 "..-°°W ii .. ., -'•-•-•--• - . •• ••..,..,....... -,•. ,.,,,....-.,..... .,.'„ :•Ilk?". 1 15 -,,..•-:-.-__, - --.: ---,- : ,f,-- -,-,_.•, _- -,- ...-• ,.-,41-7 117'•:. i • -.. ,-„....... . . .._•.„'.... ..... . ....., it ity,77.111 .1 . l 1 ... i' - .,.... 4.1 FL L , .f •• ',... mug O.= .. - - 11-.. II—----":1;. i ..... ..,........ .;.. - , ,.,,• ,..•,......, ,.... , , . : • i — !I . .., . .... ...,.. ...... .. . t 4 4t.3 •... 'I ,,,, D-i r. ; 1 , . • . . „ . . .. • - — - -. 1 ..' -.:' 0---1 MIMI , . •' -' rf Fi E• . ,, li i • •,,, ,. 2 ; , . .. Fial ••—.I 1 .\ • , . mom I , .• PEI . .. . . .....__. . , . , ,, . .. , ,,,.. .,;,,, 4zi 1 , \ ,, ,., . . ,,,, • .-• . . 1 c•• (iri 1:._._1[ • / I . .t. ...- • MIMI V • CD . :.... 1 .-ill:•::Z:.ir i ' C 11111 —41t.—7. ' 1 •MIN N I . , .., ..... C 11 Om. IIIIi -,2 -chiii / o_ ca / . .., . .„..... . . > c a) -..57•• __-- - 111.1:•",:}1' ' . cl 0 ,.,• if ' ,•, .-, _.. 4 . , , a) 4.0 th MIMI 0:1 ' . / = II IMO 4..r . S..' ' E / 0 w i ''' a) .. / --...._ .., . 03 V •i .' .i •• . — !: ! . CI- ,0C 0 > ....! 03 0: imam (i) ' ,• VA_ -1 5 1( / • c / - • 4 ,', -,t . , * -1 -31 - ' • • f P. • -1 As t . - , 4 , '4- . . . \ : • . . -1 A • t . 1 ) WV ritilik J 1 , . ' r I V • /Air e. A . . .....-s Ili Ili III ...- , , .,-, •t., *1•"e.,?-- - ;, . - , 4 f,i n . ' . • *I •• 1 „ , , . -,..?. ,4„,, .,-• „,. - 4 • • ir ' a • !, . •f-,1, •.:-• . Iry A - .4.4 •z . • 'fi !•••••• .:1,... , -' - • ., _, . • - t.- - • . . .1., • , \ A ''. .1.* •.,44t" - = - - - -": .,-, • . . ' \ • ......-- . , . ; I' '' ''- ' i - , i.,. ,,••1-t. .. .-••.*;: ---•.A - , ,.. .,...„_:,...r. • ..,.....-,,,i4. • ‘,.. i .. _ 1.,,, ,..„44e.s1-10,:,,,,re:,:f.to.,,,,y---. .,---.',E,e*. 7."... ., ‘ •' - 4. 4 I F.'" 'S.. . d''' ;. '''...• ' ':.1,'-:";,...'. 1 11/111114.\ • ,:4 rk"-:," , - ! ... .- ,- ', , . • , -__.,-.-- 1 P'1 •!'--... ' ':' : - ' ' ' ' f ' .*- ---.- -- -L-7- .--- ---z:.-•,- 1 , _I 4'.. - „.,..4 • ... v --- • , % t:v-t.4 .. • •• -.4 1111111 . • . • • . - - - 4 , .• 4 ,. . '''' • . - • 'k. ' ;',";4„-t• :,...r..04,14, "'' ' .i -, . k',•'.',I'.kk>....1*,.,gs-k.,,, ,,,..--"'"- ' . ' • 0 ••-**.' '- 'I' ; „‘",,,; , ....• A,0 1) • - • 4,4,-,.,;" --4-: -.t,i,s'' ••: ' - 1 `• '0'• ., . , -.. 41.) , , , .. ' Z = *-.<4...• ...SA- - -.11;-,.: . - . - • - - ,..-.4 -,-,-, • 3 .5 . . , . ,4: - -!,.. •Al t.4...-• , ,. -. -.- 4•14-:-4-.7, - , ,-- . . ..4 4,, -a - „?:-1.11:..--,." ---....,44! ... - - - I-0 1, 1 ?,!* 's-' „ ...,,- ;•4,„,-k. ' et I • . ---. .4. Fi W E • -0:, -i.• r v __. ., . r - 'No,'”- . . . !' _lee . ''i ' l'A . k. V ' ' ' F7.• • ' ''',. :7 ' k...lita-'*!:''.4 ' ' ".k,, 4 .. ' •••,t.',..4.4 • .,, ' ,. .. dr- ' " ek" fie likt, ti," . . .• , • , -,ilPt •. -' . . 'S.'. •••• .- , - • ' • I -41*-....4,4.4-1. , • li" - ......_-. , s �r�� ? ' } ` t f . V i • k - n , t v4" r - .i, �: f T i is • 3 r,r 4;'.�. Ati , 1, ., -,-, , _ -- li-..,101. ••,,, ____ t ,i I\- , . Td 1 ' J W i • I ., � • 1 F u 7r. Y 3.4.45:::.si,. - :,,,,,. . . , I ‘,.- 1 -1r- ' _fid •••••-••,,,¢ s.. _Y ''. t_ - r — . I'l i atgf.: * . - z'''''' t 4lo i4 • • t I : �' It *1,� -�__.. ®i 1 1 4. 0" ..� 400 40,01 0004 a -1:..........,....„.....„..... , { 3 + i -i r r ;fit b 1 ^ \\ rF. w i. 1 H l�� l iC4 co. • _ V 44 \ �.. w- _ i i 's''':::1- � 1 •fit :? ` - , n 1 s� .L.fill. _,:i4::. �.� .7 7 F , :::::: !,*:s'. '. - :, ' ;: �'1 tit 'F + y Y i ;.1`......;4::.‘: S . iI I _ - 4 , t a ' f • • . :J..' - ,\, t NMI I jl I g € � } s ' Y k i i dl r4 ' -i 1i(s t + moi t. t .- t -_ — !` 'i 'FI -i . %- -_-._ 1 1. - Y k '11 1 � c» pp� � a= 1,,,i;„;v, jji4 k�E k ' ami ," ' 1 ' $z ' ' ' L-4'-,•''.; Pt ti ,4 7-7d , Nom 6e___ T7-,01) cfr --/O.§Z) Gly//A-)CD Gam-{'6,1`3u.&i i #11-'e S zoo .u�,, _ Arz-oieL--e-oterg- St-(12-vicc_. ;,,t2 eitio /, V v4 /D 7/e2 6,t/,rb-rnv ilAWT e-f))el 70 , 14NiT" l5 off _A-yu ofeL4r7dAduz 39-db'R�PoI ruT S/P6(2--1 lAAP(3s C} ---r) lazi.J ' re) 00,--Jr \ )11/ ()(2_ /06-call. ? tt) AANk-65- #APPe3U I fp1 //t) 7-4/ c.41_5 -1-2) �ld-rs z so / c goloc -rw(2,0 / - b4,„,eittpi,7 C(4) ff-4-ty G.,. p„,, 0)2,0„20e.,31 1 trI7A,rz ?4._// „,_a-0 fig4-012------- Li#01--CAik, (� ' <-1 x-15 s P.40 ti--.),A) _ /4,4- /2---- e . ,,„--..,P•L-P-6g1.frIA(e" t" • 49MC,,,i6.- F-. 9-e,),\-- 2----(Afr— E3 a X,LLD ,!-- Oto\P---4._ 01AtAt ,_ __A(2- -4- 2._ --5r2)A-16-,---cz. 7,1.1,4iove / V yo-z3 / �-e� \re--� -4 2.__ � 5 S—/ • —., _/ O- e - MSI p'i =, ' , .. ''''''f,0\07")–C .C7 aNi y-to_w Aireevivb lekaiAJG 1.--'07-3 Dunbar Development Corporation Frank C.Dunbar President 5000 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 200 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55422-5146 (763)377-7090•FAX(763)377-7089 E-Mail: fcd_ddc@visi.com Planning I Civil Engineering Minneapolis, MN 55369 ' Land Surveying MILLER Tel 763.424.5505 HANSON Environmental WESTERBECK Fax'63.4` o5822 gy Archaeollogy BERGER, INC mstmarti@loucksmclagan.com ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS Michael J.St.Martin,RE. KENT SIMON,Vice President Civil Engineer Architect �/C 1201 HAWTHORNE AVENUE 612-332-5420 Web:www.mhwb.com L O U C K S MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55403 FAX 612-332-5425 e-mail:ksimon@mhwb.com ' offices: Minneapolis, St.Paul TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator A, DATE: July 12, 2000 / SUBJECT: Frank Dunbar Senior Housing Proposal on the Rebers Property Several months ago,Frank Dunbar presented a four-story senior housing proposal to the Council that included retail uses on the first floor. The Council indicated the four-story building was too tall,and suggested the first floor retail be eliminated, leaving a three-story senior housing building. Mr. Dunbar has now developed a proposal for a three-story senior housing building on the east portion of the Rebers property, and a two-story medical office building in the northwest corner of the Rebers property. The proposed concept plan is attached. Building Massing Staff has advised Mr. Dunbar that the massing of the building, particularly as viewed from the intersection of North Brown Road and Highway 12, is a key concern of the City. Access Issues Staff has several concerns regarding access issues related to the concept plan. These are as follows: 1. There is no connection between the office building and the senior housing building to provide access from the office building to North Brown Road. 2. There is no connection from the office building to a frontage road to the west. 3. The concept plan shows two separate access points to Highway 12 for the office building and senior building. These should be combined into one access point, and the access should be right-in/right-out only. The concept plan creates a situation where the only access for the office building is from Highway 12. In addition to staff's concern regarding left turns on Highway 12 at uncontrolled access points, there is an existing median on Highway 12 along the entire length of the Rebers property that prohibits left-hand turns. The concept plan would require eastbound traffic to make a U-turn at North Brown Road to access the office building. From staffs perspective,the plan should include,at minimum,a connection from the office building to a future frontage road extending across the northern portion of the Wear property to an extension of Brimhall Road (please see the attached map). If the senior housing/office building proposal moves forward, it should trigger the construction of a frontage road as a permanent solution to the Highway 12 access issue. dy Frank Dunbar September 15, 2000 Page 3 Preliminary Key Issues As noted at our meeting Monday, there are a few key issues which the City sees as critical in development of this site. It would be very helpful to have information regarding these issues prior to the early October work session: A. The adequacy of the existing stormwater pond to serve this development.The pond is owned and controlled by MnDOT. We will expect that you provide the appropriate engineering calculations to confirm its adequacy or show how you will rectify any inadequacies. B. The access issue is complex, involving: - circulation within the site and between the two buildings/uses, including parking layout; - whether(or when) it may be necessary to complete the service road connection from your site to the Highway 12/Brimhall Avenue intersection; - how access to and from this site will function in relation to Brown Road and Highway 12, especially in the interim period before a semaphore is installed at Brown/12 as part of the Highway 12 re-routing project. You should plan to have a traffic study completed as part of the submittals to address this issue. C. Height and massing of the buildings,especially the senior housing,as viewed from Highway 12 and Brown Road, and as viewed from the Sugar Woods residential neighborhood. Illustrative before and after views will be helpful to the City in assessing these impacts. We are looking forward to working with you on this project, and will seek to provide whatever assistance we can in moving the process forward. Please feel free to contact me or other staff members if you have questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator cc: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Planner/Zoning Administrator Mayor Jabbour and Councilmembers Chair Liz Hawn and Planning Commission Members di‘ 0.N. 0 0 . CITY of ORONO *$* i 1 � H2 Municipal Offices 9 ', <" ::.',42/ Street Address: Mailing Address: 4'Egg 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 September 15, 2000 Frank C. Dunbar, President Dunbar Development Corporation 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55422-5146 Re: Proposed development at Brown Road/US 12 Dear Mr. Dunbar: As we discussed on Monday, your proposal for senior housing and an office building on the Rebers site poses a number of planning challenges for the City, in terms of requiring the creation of a new zoning district and performance standards. This is not in and of itself a problem, but the schedule necessary to arrive at final project approvals prior to the end of the year may be difficult. Your proposal will require the following applications: 1. A request for an amendment of the zoning chapter to create a new zoning district to allow the proposed senior housing use. City staff will draft an amendment that creates a new zoning district with performance standards to accomplish this intended use.For the moment for discussion purposes we will name this potential district "MFSR" (Multi-Family Senior Residential).However,we are also contemplating a single new PUD district that allows both office and certain multi-family residential as permitted uses. 2. A request for rezoning of the property. 3. A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the guide plan for this area from strictly commercial to allowing multi-family residential under specified circumstances, as a conditional use and most likely as a PUD/PRD. 4. A request for subdivision(platting)of the site into two separate tax parcels(and to eliminate the current Outlot status of the property). 5. A request for conditional use permit to develop the entire site as a PUD/PRD with MFSR as the underlying district for the residential portion and B-6 Highway Commercial District as the underlying district for the office portion. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us Frank Dunbar September 15, 2000 Page 2 A zoning code amendment to create a new zoning district could potentially be scheduled for a public hearing by the Planning Commission at its October 16 meeting, if you make application for that amendment by next Wednesday, September 20. The remaining elements of the application process (items 2-5) relate to the actual site and its planning. It is imperative that,prior to consideration by the Planning Commission,your application is totally complete and staff has had sufficient time to fully review all aspects of the application; it would be our intent to work with you to refine the application so that it meets the City's development requirements. It does not appear that it is possible to accomplish this in time for Planning Commission consideration of the application at its October meeting. If we push to get to the October meeting, there will, almost certainly be unresolved issues that will result in a continuation of the application to the November Planning Commission meeting. A preferred alternative is to submit the application as soon as possible, but to target the November Planning Commission meeting for consideration of the application. During the interim period,staff will work with you to identify issues and refine the proposal to address the issues. This process would include a work session with the Planning Commission in early October to identify issues that can be addressed prior to final application submittal for the November Planning Commission meeting. In addition,a meeting could be held with the neighbors in Sugar Woods to identify and address their concerns. This process would substantially increase the probability that the Planning Commission would be able to forward the application to the City Council for Council consideration in early December. To summarize: 1. Apply for the zoning code amendment no later than 12 noon on Wednesday September 20, to be heard by the Planning Commission on Monday October 16. 2. Apply for the rezoning,Comp Plan amendment,subdivision and CUP for PUD/PRD no later than 12 noon on Wednesday October 18,for consideration by the Planning Commission on Monday November 20. 3. Prior to October 18 and preferably around October 1, we would hope to schedule a work session with the Planning Commission and Council to identify issues and concerns,to assist you in making a more complete application by the October 18 deadline. Based on this scheduling, it would be feasible to have Council consideration of the preliminary plat and PUD at the Council's December 11 meeting. Frank Dunbar September 15, 2000 Page 3 • Preliminary Key Issues As noted at our meeting Monday, there are a few key issues which the City sees as critical in development of this site. It would be very helpful to have information regarding these issues prior to the early October work session: A. The adequacy of the existing stormwater pond to serve this development.The pond is owned and controlled by MnDOT. We will expect that you provide the appropriate engineering calculations to confirm its adequacy or show how you will rectify any inadequacies. B. The access issue is complex, involving: - circulation within the site and between the two buildings/uses, including parking layout; - whether(or when) it may be necessary to complete the service road connection from your site to the Highway 12/Brimhall Avenue intersection; -how access to and from this site will function in relation to Brown Road and Highway 12, especially in the interim period before a semaphore is installed at Brown/l2 as part of the Highway 12 re-routing project. You should plan to have a traffic study completed as part of the submittals to address this issue. C. Height and massing of the buildings,especially the senior housing,as viewed from Highway 12 and Brown Road, and as viewed from the Sugar Woods residential neighborhood. Illustrative before and after views will be helpful to the City in assessing these impacts. We are looking forward to working with you on this project, and will seek to provide whatever assistance we can in moving the process forward. Please feel free to contact me or other staff members if you have questions. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator cc: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Planner/Zoning Administrator Mayor Jabbour and Councilmembers Chair Liz Hawn and Planning Commission Members T- x 1005.5 1010 x FFE=101 GARAGE W-1 IV fX i .c O T 1 r , r g^�h� N x 1005.5 1010 x FFE=101 GARAGE W-1 IV fX i .c O T x 1005.5 1010 x FFE=101 GARAGE W-1 IV FFE =--100.1: GARAGE=991.5 3.0s J N i .c O T A r , r g^�h� N l - �: r � F FFE =--100.1: GARAGE=991.5 3.0s J x990.4 x890.5 to Cn N i .c O T A r x990.4 x890.5 to Cn r�t • NJ = fli ICITY OF I M I N N E .c O T A OWNER/DEVELOPER g^�h� N �: qq GSy�' v� r�t • NJ = fli ICITY OF I M I N N E S O T A OWNER/DEVELOPER CADD FILE OVALIFICATION: '... CADD files prepared by the Engineer/SurveXor for this project are instruments of the Engineer's/Surveyors professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project or for completion of this project by others without written approval by this Engineer/Surveyor. With the Engineers/Surveyor's approval others may be "permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Engineer/Surveyor from any all responsibilities, claims and liabilities. SHEEP I TITLE C1-1 TITLE SHEET 131-2 LEGENDS/KEY PLAN C2-1 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA A C2-2 LAYOUT PLAN -AREA B 172-3 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA C C3-1 GRADING PLAN - AREA A C3-2 GRADING PLAN - AREA B C3-3 GRADING PLAN - AREA C C4-1 UTILITY PLAN - AREA A C4-2 UTILITY PLAN - AREA B C4-3 UTILITY PLAN - AREA C C4-4 ENLARGED UTILITY PLAN C4-6 D MESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C4-7 FIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C5-1 SITE DETAILS C5-2 I SITE DETAILS 135-3 UTILITY DETAILS C5-4 UTILITY DETAILS IDATE REVISION IQUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: BY: DATE: ASSOCIATES Planning . Civil Engineering • land Surveying Environmental 0 Archaeology 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369-5592 Telephone: (612)424-5505 Fax: (612)424-5822 © 2000 Web Page loucksmclagan.eom PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & ERSION CONTROL PLAN PROJECT NO, 00-216 C-3-1 C3010. I lAiTG I � I I� N N E S 51 F. d f js CITY OF M I N N E S O T A OWNER/DEVELOPER CPDD FILE QUALIFICATION: CARD files prepared by the Engineer/SurveXor for this project are Instruments of the En Eng" professional services "for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files .'shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project or for completion of this pro'ect by' others without written approval 11 by this Engineer/Surveyor: N9�h the Engineer s/Surveyar's approval others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CARD drawing ,.� files forinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or h--t-ne-ty shail hold harmless and indemnify ;t. c - Engineer/Surveyor from any & all responsibilities, claims and liabilities. SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLE Ci -1 TITLE SHEET C1-2 LEGENDS/KEY PLAN C2-1 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA A C2-2 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA B C2-3 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA C C3-1 GRADING PLAN AREA A C3-2 GRADING PLAN - AREA B C3-3 GRADING PLAN - AREA C C4-1 UTILITY PLAN - AREA A C4-2 UTILITY PLAN - AREA B C4-3 UTILITY PLAN - AREA C C4-4 ENLARGED UTILITY PLAN C4-13 DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C4-7 FIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C5-1 SITE DETAILS C5-2 SITE DETAILS C5-3 UTILITY DETAILS C5-4 UTILITY DETAILS DATE REVISION S 1� QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW- BY: EVIEWBY: _ DATE: ASSOCIATES Planning • Civil Engineering • Land Surveying Environmental • Archaeology 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55300-5502 Telephone: (012)424-5505 Fax: (612)424-5022 02000 Web Page loucksmetagan.com PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PROJECT NO. 00-216-`�_1 C4010.DWG )0 I 0 is CITY OF M I N N E 3 0 T OWNER/DEVELOPER CADD FILE OUAUFICATION: CADD files prepared by the Engineer/Surveyor for this project are instruments of the Engineer s/Surveyors professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used an other projects, for additions to this project orfor completion of this p ject by others without written approve by this Engineer/Surveyor. ith the Engineer's/Surveyor's approval others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintenti, revisions, additions or deleti ns to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that Pat, making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Engineer/Surveyor from any & all responsibilities, claims and liabili SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLE Cl -1 TITLE SHEET C1-2 LEGENDS/KE PLAN C2-1 LAYOUT PL — AREA A C2-2 LAYOUT P — AREA B C2-3 LAYOUT P — AREA C C3-1 GRADING P — AREA A C3-2 GRADING PLA — AREA B C3-3 GRADING P — AREA C C4-1 UTILITY PLAN — AREA A C4-2 UTILITY PLAN — AREA B C4-3 UTILITY PLAN — AREA C C4-4 ENLARGED UTILITY PLAN C4-6 DOMESTIC WArER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C4-7 FIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C5-1 SITE DETAILS C5-2 SITE DETAILS C5-3 UTILITY DETAILS C5-4 UTILITY DETAILS DATE REVISION QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: BY: DATE: SISOCIATES 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300, Minneapolis, Iftnnesota 55369-554 Telephone: (612)424-5505 Fax: (812)424-5822 © z000 web Page loucksmelagan.com PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & ERSION CONTROL PLAN PROJECT N0. 00-216 C-3�-' A CITY OF M I N N E S 0 T A 0�,$/DEVELnPER KEY PLAN CADD FILE DUAUFICATIDN: CADD files prepared by the Engineer/SurveXor for this project are instruments of the En ,,S professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project or for complefan of this project by others without written approval by this Engineer/Surveyor. With the Engineer's/Surveyors approval others may be permitted to obtain cosies of WGe CARD drawing files for information and reference only,, All intentional or unintention, revisions, additions or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Engineer/Surveyor from any do all responsibilities, claims and liabilitie SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLE Cl -1 TITLE SHEET C1-2 LEGENDS/KEY PLAN C2-1 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA A C2-2 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA B C2-3 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA C C3-1 GRADING PLAN - AREA A C3-2 GRADING PLAN - AREA B C3-3 GRADING PLAN - AREA C C4-1 UTILITY PLAN - AREA A C4-2 UTILITY PLAN - AREA B C4-3 UTILITY PLAN - AREA C C4-4 ENLARGED UTILITY PLAN C4-6 DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C4-7 FIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C5-1 SITE DETAILS C5-2 SITE DETAILS C5-3 UTILITY DETAILS C5-4 UTILITY DETAILS DATE REVISION QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: BY: DATE: SSOCIATES buvtroamentm - Arenaeology 7200 Hemlock lane, Suite 308, Minneapolia, Lfmnesota 55369-559 Telephone: (612)424-5505 Fax: (612)424-5822 02000 Web Page loucksmclagan.eom PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PROJECT N0. 00-216 C -2 - Q� CITY OF M I N N E S 0 T OWNER/DEVELOPE KEY PLAN CADD FILE QLAURCATION- CADD files prepared by the Engineer/Su—r�or for this projec are instruments of the Engineer's/Surveyors professional ser foruse solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used or. other projects, for additions to this pi or for completion of this project by others without written c by this Engineer/Surveyor. With the Engineer s/Surveyor's up, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD dray files for information and reference only. All intentional or ur revisions, additions or deletions to these CADD files sholl be at the full risk of that party making such reviswns, additior deletions and that party shell hold harmless and indemnify Engineer/Surveyor from any & all responsibilities, claims ani SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLE C1-1 TITLE SHEET C1-2 LEGENDS/KEY PLAN C2-1 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA A C2-2 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA B C2-3 LAYOUT PLAN - AREA C C3-1 GRADING PLAN - AREA A C3-2 GRADING PLAN - AREA B C3-3 GRADING PLAN - AREA C C4-1 UTILITY PLAN - AREA A C4-2 UTILITY PLAN - AREA B C4-3 UTILITY PLAN - AREA C C4-4 ENLARGED UTILITY PLAN C4-6 DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTE C4-7 FIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM C5-1 SITE DETAILS C5-2 SITE DETAILS C5-3 UTILITY DETAILS C5-4 UTILITY DETAILS II DATE REVISION QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: PY• DATE: Ili Lo,.QCKS OCIATI 7200 Hemlock lane, Shite 300, Minneapolis, Minnesota Telephone: (612}424-5505 Fax: (612)424-5E 02000 lfeb Page loucksmelagan.com EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT N0. 00-216 C