The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-16-2021 Planning Commission Packet liZLOAt0 Agenda Planning Commission Meeting August 16, 2021, 6:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 •K£SHos`" 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available on the City website (www.ci.orono.mn.us) in Agendas Minutes & Videos and in the Public Packet—located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Dennis Walsh Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes: July 19, 2021 Public Hearings: 1. LA21-000050 Alyssa Dwyer, 2915 Casco Point Road, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 2. LA21-000052 Petit Design - Barry Petit, 3355 Crystal Bay Road, Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 3. LA21-000054 Sharratt Design &Co., 2695 Shadywood Road, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) Other Business: 4. Update on August 9, 2021 City Council meeting Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to Monday, September 13, 2021 City Council meeting: Bob Erickson Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Scott Kirchner,Commissioners Chris Bollis,Bob Erickson,Matt Gettman,Mark McCutcheon,and Jon Ressler; Commissioner Dennis Libby was absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart and City Planner Melanie Curtis. City Council representative Dennis Walsh was also present. Chair Kirchner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ressler moved,Bollis seconded,to approve the Agenda.VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 21,2021 Gettman moved,Ressler seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of June 21,2021 as submitted.VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.LA21-000029 BOB ERICKSON,365 WESTLAKE STREET,VACATION OF PLATTED RIGHTS-OF-WAY—WESTLAKE AND ADJACENT ALLEY.(STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Bob Erickson,Applicant,was present. Commissioner Erickson stepped down and excused himself for the item. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart stated Mr.Erickson is requesting a vacation to vacate a portion of Westlake Street adjacent to his property. Originally the request included vacation of an adjacent alley but he has removed that from the request. This is part of a multi-step process and ultimately the Applicant is proposing to plat this property and provide right-of-way to complete the portion of a cul- de-sac that is already platted. The Applicant is also proposing to provide an easement for an existing sanitary sewer facility in that area. Staff is recommending- in addition to the easement for drainage and utility purposes- a pedestrian access to maintain access to the lake. Staff has received a number of comments from neighboring property owners who object to that pedestrian access easement. Staff supports the vacation request subject to the easement for drainage and utility purposes,and subject to a pedestrian access easement to maintain or provide access to Lake Minnetonka in this area. Staff notes that there are four other accesses on Stubbs Bay;one is for winter only,one is for fishing only,and two are noted as no public access in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has received a number of comments in support of the vacation, and some comments that object to the easement for pedestrian access. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions. Chair Kirchner asked if the easement and right-of-way for pedestrian access would be improved at this time. Barnhart replied the easement for drainage and utility is already improved,the pedestrian access improvements are not proposed at this time. There would be no change right now, it would be for potential future access to the lake. Page 1of18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Bollis asked if there are any current conditions on access number 14,the one they are looking at vacating, such as winter access,no motorized vehicles,etcetera. Barnhart stated that access is noted as pedestrian access in the current Comprehensive Plan. Ressler asked if that portion of the property is currently being used as pedestrian access. Barnhart said used is a strong term, it is pretty overgrown and he showed some pictures of the access point with large cattails growing. He noted it is not likely that it would be a summer access without significant improvements; he imagines it may be a winter access in the future or perhaps even now. It is not restricted based on the Comprehensive Plan. Gettman asked if a pedestrian access would potentially change the DNR's position. Barnhart replied the DNR provides comment and recommendation but not a lot of weight. The access for pedestrians would support their goals for lake access for the State. Bollis asked what width they are suggesting for this easement. Barnhart said probably similar to the easement necessary for the sanitary sewer;the goal is not to restrict development for the property owners on either side but to maintain access so 20 feet is likely. Bob Erickson,365 Westlake Street,read a letter he sent out to his neighbors: To our neighbors: Thank you for this opportunity to share with you our vision for Westlake Street improvement that we believe will improve vehicle function and home values in our neighborhood Our long-term plan began to take shape in 1999 when we applied for a rearrangement of the two parcels we had purchased at 365 and 372 Westlake so that the unequally-sized lots could be made more equal in area in lakeshore measurements.As part of that process, we donated a half-circle of land on the east side of Westlake Street for a future cul-de-sac.At the same time, the City Council voted to close the part of the street south of the cul-de-sac to all motorized vehicles.Later, we acquired the house at 365 Westlake Street and two smaller houses which were demolished about a year-and-a-half ago. Now the time has come for us to plan for the cul-de-sac completion by applying for vacation of the south 140 feet of Westlake Street and combining that area with the 365 Westlake property for which we will pay$100,000. In addition, we will donate a new half-circle of land on the west side of the street to complete the area needed for the cul-de-sac. We will also donate easements over the vacated land to the City for drainage and sanitary sewer maintenance. In view of the recently announced addition of Westlake Street to the list of streets to be improved during 2022, we are also willing to add a 10x150 foot donation of land at 341 Westlake Street as a boulevard reserve. The original plat for Westlake Street was approved over 100 years ago when most of its traffic was made up of small horse-drawn carriages, the 30 foot right-of-way width was adequate at the time, and firefighters would put hoses into the lake to put out fires. For many years now the Fire Departments have used tank trucks when needed and all types of vehicles have grown in size. That is why a new neighborhood subdivision requires 50 feet of street right-of-way and a 50 foot radius for a cul-de-sac. When complete, the new cul-de-sac will make Westlake Street look and function much like a newer neighborhood Take a quick spin around the Landmark Drive and Eileen Circle cul- de-sacs to compare how modern vehicles can be accommodated. Delivery trucks, garbage trucks, lawn services, and utility workers all have a much easier time getting in and out of those neighborhoods. Ifyou have questions, we are here to answer them in person or by phone. Signed, Bob and Lisa Erickson. Page 2 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Since sending out this letter,Mr.Erickson has received five endorsements of the street vacation and cul- de-sac.Mr.Erickson's general comment regarding the DNR is that he cannot work with this as the DNR is describing it,as it would negatively impact the value of the real estate and the value of their neighbor's real estate.Finally,what the DNR described as having no public value actually has no value to the DNR for access to a lake which is overgrown and has little or no water in it at this point.He stated he has been there for 18 years and the access does not get used for obvious reasons in looking at photographs. He noted the DNR's comment has no basis in fact;to be more specific,the letter talks about present and potential use.Mr.Erickson noted there is no present use. The letter says regarding potential uses: "as land-use patterns change..."As a Planning Commissioner and someone who participated before that in the Guide Plan AdvisoryCommittee,they all get involved in land-use,making those decisions or giving advice. Land-use patterns do not just change by themselves and the Guide Plan is supposed to be good for 20-30 years although it gets reviewed every 10 years. The DNR's letter also stated fluctuation in lake levels, either seasonal or long-term,can be unpredictable. Mr.Erickson has also served on the Board of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)and they work very hard at maintaining lake levels where they would like them to be.He copied a graphic from the MCWD where it shows how the control mechanism works at the Gray's Bay Dam;he noted the lowest the lake ever was,was in the 1930's during the drought and depression where it reached 922 feet above sea level.He noted on the graphic it shows the record high level is 931.1 feet above sea level which has been approached several times over the last 115 years but has never gone over that.He stated for planning purposes a projected regional flood of four- tenths of a foot higher than that;this would be virtually impossible to exceed because before getting to that point there is unrestricted flow into Minnehaha Creek, which leads over the falls and into the Mississippi River. The only way this could happen is if the Mississippi River raises itself 230 feet and it would then be at the 931 that Lake Minnetonka is at.He clarified at the 931 the MSP Airport would be 120 feet underwater. The DNR stated the access may be needed for emergency vehicles,to which Mr. Erickson responded if the airport is 100 feet underwater he thinks the emergency vehicles will be concentrating their efforts in South Minneapolis rather than Lake Minnetonka.He finds it hard to be convinced by a figment of someone's imagination. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Wade Kram,340 Westlake Street,noted Westlake Street is a tiny little street. If they had the public access after the cul-de-sac were to come in and have people come for this supposed snowshoeing or snowmobile access and trample over everything that is already there,when right around the corner they have the Stubbs Bay Road with the beautiful park that has been renovated and all of the parking,it does not make any sense. Why would someone venture off into a neighborhood,park their vehicle on an already tiny street and impede things for service trucks.He said to put that potential traffic far outweighs, in the negative,the positive of some potential access someone may need 50-100 years down the road. He does not understand and from a safety standpoint,he has three little children, and with increased traffic, potential littering, and parking it does not make sense to him. Linda Thrasher, 356 Westlake Street stated Mr.Erickson has presented an unusual partnership as one does not see many private landowners offering to pay$100,000 for beautification of a cul-de-sac. She understands that he,too,will benefit but her advice would be to take advantage of a unique opportunity of which adding public access destroys the integrity of what Mr. Erickson is trying to do. The Erickson's have done a fabulous job with their current property and if their vision for that property is the same for the cul-de-sac, it is going to be gorgeous and will be natural—that is what Ms. Thrasher would like the DNR to see.Having a public access just does not make sense as they have been landowners in the area for 9 years and she has never seen anyone enter the lake for snowshoeing,snowmobiling, or walking. She Page 3 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. walks her dog down there and it is impossible to actually access the lake.Driving by the other access points that were pointed out,they are widely used,and she is asking for a rational decision. She said let's make this rather unattractive,narrow street attractive, and make it easy for vehicles to come turn around and do the right thing. Sherry White,3516 Ivy Place, is here to ask the Commission to recommend to the City Council that they deny the vacation request for this property. The vacation of the lake access will provide no public benefit and that is the standard the City must adhere to,not whether it is a good idea to have this or not,but rather is there a public benefit in vacating the property. She noted there is a significant financial benefit to the Applicant as he assembles property for development,and she finds that disparity very troubling. The lack of public benefit was stated by the DNR and the Staff recommendation says there is a benefit to having a cul-de-sac and it would be a great thing to have utility, stormwater, and pedestrian easement—but of course the City already has those things.That would not be a gain but a clawing back of a loss.There is public benefit in retaining this property,it is obviously access and they do not know what the future holds.There is a natural resource value in all undeveloped land. There are letters of support giving reasons why the cul-de-sac would be a good thing,she buys that,but the blanket statements of support in those letters with no rationale given is not persuasive.A quick note about pedestrian access, she quoted from the DNR letter that they would recommend that if the City did vacate,they would retain the right of the public to travel across the property.That does not say foot traffic. She hopes this will not be vacated but if it is the City should be very thoughtful in crafting conditions for that,which may include stormwater and utility easements,access for pedestrians and recreational vehicles,and City or other government vehicles that may need to access it in the future. She said to require the developer to plant native vegetation, enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to keep that vegetation going,and require signage indicating that there is a public access there.These conditions might somewhat ameliorate the loss of a public property. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. Chair Kirchner said currently in the photographs he saw there is no parking on that street. Is there any intention to widen the street to allow for parking or would it likely remain signed as"no parking." Barnhart does not believe there is any intention to widen the road for parking. Bollis' understanding is that the developer is not proposing to pay for and build the cul-de-sac. Barnhart's understanding is they are providing the right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and next year when Westlake is part of the street project the Applicant intends that the City would pave the cul-de-sac at that time. Bollis asked if there is an estimate on the cost to build this cul-de-sac. Barnhart believes that is in engineering at this stage.The pavement will be a decision of the City Council. Kirchner asked if the application they are voting to approve or deny includes pedestrian access or not? Barnhart replied the request is to vacate the road. Staff is supporting the vacation based on several conditions,including the pedestrian access. The Commission can pull conditions out if they so desire. Page 4 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Kirchner thinks they can all agree that the vacation of the roadway to allow for a cul-de-sac development is a sound judgment and the point of contention here is going to be the pedestrian right-of-way access point. Regarding the pedestrian easement,personally,he struggles to vacate that portion of it as they have heard numerous comments of limited use in the last 9-18 years and he does not see how a cul-de-sac at the end of the street is suddenly going to increase pedestrian traffic to that area.If the area remains signed as no parking,there may be someone who snowshoes or cross-country skis there to access it but if the roadway is entirely signed as no parking that would prevent the increased parking on the roadway.He does not see a problem with it and he would like to see the pedestrian right-of-way remain. Ressler is a little conflicted on maintaining the pedestrian access simply because he feels there are five total accesses on Stubbs Bay,some appear to be seasonal.He knows that the one that is guided for fishing access has been used for other uses besides fishing, as he personally has gone through the landing to snowmobile. If Ressler was an emergency vehicle looking for access to the lake he thinks that would be his first choice because of its convenience,efficiency,and direct access without any encumbrances. This particular property with the wetlands is telling as to why it has not been used.He is conflicted as he thinks they may want to reserve the right to future access and he is okay with the vacation not granting the access based upon the other accesses near this location. He is supportive of the vacation as applied. Gettman said in looking at the density of the different access points,he looks around at West Arm,North Arm, and they have similar density to the access points.More importantly,he learned that one does not give something up unless it is of equal value or more beneficial and that is the whole purpose of doing the vacation, it has to have a public benefit and Gettman is not hearing that.He would latch on to the suggestion that there be signage for public access, keep the cul-de-sac concept as that is good,but also keep the public right-of-way and there would not be the parking issue.He said if they were going to go really far,why not vacate the entire road and let them do the improvement next year and they cannot have their$100,000 invested in whatever but take care of the road. Gettman is not sure he is hearing anything that tips the scale to vacate that public access, it just does not make any sense to him. Bollis thinks they have to keep in mind that there might be five access points on Stubbs Bay but two of those they learned are not actual public access points but for the City's own purposes. Therefore,they are really only looking at three access points, and one has a winter restriction, so there is this access point and the one on Stubbs Bay Road are the only summer access points.He is not in favor of not having some sort of easement if they go the vacation route. He likes the idea of vacating and trading that for a cul-de-sac but would rather see that the developer builds and pays for the cul-de-sac versus the City. It might cost more than the$100,000 to actually build the cul-de-sac. Therefore,the City may be at a net loss. He is not in favor of it as it is applied for and would be a no vote tonight. McCutcheon was surprised there was not access today,and even if they put a cul-de-sac or any improvement in there,no one is going to use it. In the winter there may be someone walking a dog or an ice fisherman but going down there as it is public use to be walked on, and he does not want to see snowmobiles down there. He struggles because logically he says no,they do not need it because no one uses it,but they cannot predict the future and if it is already there,why take it away. He can understand the neighborhood concern on drawing people in and more activity with a cul-de-sac but he still does not see that. He understands right now the way it is,no one bothers the residents in the neighborhood and in putting any kind of improvement people are going to start using this place more so he understands the contention.He is torn but does not think there would be a lot of activity using it so he would be in favor with the Staffs recommendation in leaving the ingress and egress access. Page 5 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler may have misunderstood the application and asked if part of the proposal as applied is a cul-de- sac or is that something they are just discussing that would happen later. Barnhart said the cul-de-sac, sanitary sewer easement,and the storm sewer easement are a part of the application or proposal that would manifest itself as part of a final plat. The pedestrian access easement is a Staff recommendation in addition to those others. Ressler agrees with Bollis that the developer pay for the cul-de-sac would be something he would support as a condition. He has no problem with the proposed amount being paid above and beyond that for the property,he does see adequate benefit for the storm water and utility for drainage as a public benefit as well as the ability for emergency vehicles to turn around in said cul-de-sac. Bollis is confused,and asked if tonight they are just voting on vacation and the potential of a cul-de-sac in the future if that property gets platted,but there is nothing to connect that to the vacation. Barnhart replied yes,that is why there are the recommended conditions in terms of the cul-de-sac provision and the easement for the utilities. Bollis clarified they can vote to approve it tonight based on those conditions later. Barnhart said what the Commission and later City Council would be saying is there is no public benefit or public purpose for this property. Then the County disburses it,typically equally to each property owner on either side. Mr. Erickson owns both properties and he has indicated a desire to re-plat the area, including this to-be-vacated portion. That is when they would see those changes occur and is why they want to see it as a condition. Gettman moved to approve LA21-000029 Bob Erickson,365 Westlake Street,Vacation of Platted Rights-of-Way—Westlake And Adjacent Alley with Staff recommendations that the vacation provide for the drainage and utility easements,pedestrian easement,and additional right-of-way to complete the cul-de-sac. Ressler asked as applied, is Gettman suggesting that the City would pay for the cul-de-sac? Gettman did not say that,he did not mention the$100,000 offered, so it is just as the Staff had recommended. Kirchner asked Mr. Erickson to provide some clarity as to what the$100,000 would go towards. Mr. Erickson has not specified that so far and the reason is that he feels it is really the City Council's call. They approve the budget for everything else that goes on, and have asked for amounts from other access vacations in the past. This one is three times the amount of the former high for a wider right-of-way than this one,and also for another lake access that had usable water at it with docks on both sides.He felt that the number itself is the most generous that has been offered for a number of lake accesses that have been closed in recent history.If he had overreached his position as an Applicant,he could have said he wants all or part of it to improve the existing access at Stubbs Bay Road,for example. Page 6 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart had asked Mr. Erickson to confirm the offer of$100,000—which he did-and the City Council will determine what an appropriate use is for that money.He would suggest Gellman add that as part of the recommendation. Mr.Erickson clarified if he had specified that the$100,000 be used for improvement of a public access such as Stubbs Bay Road,then the DNR objection would have been nullified. Amended Motion by Gettman to include the$100,000 contribution to the General Fund with his original motion.Motion seconded by Kirchner. Ressler clarified the only reason he would be opposed in this vote is because he is concerned over the cost of what the cul-de-sac is going to be as that would be on the burden of the City.He also feels the adequate benefit to the City and would be okay with vacating the public access. McCutcheon said they never want to take away value.He sees this neighborhood and it is a really quiet street.Yes,there was access to Lake Minnetonka but no one used it because it was not really feasible. Putting a cul-de-sac there may make it feasible and may impact their value.He sees the point they make about creating a cul-de-sac and making something more accessible that was not there before.In thinking about that he feels for the neighborhood and from a citizen point-of-view it is not a great access as the cattails are 8 feet tall for 50 feet of lake.He may change a bit and is not in support of the public easement, but he is supportive of the vacation and taking away the pedestrian traffic. Bollis said speaking as the only non-lake resident right now,he does not see a problem with keeping access to the lake for those that do not live on the lake. It will be a no for him because even if they include the easement for people to walk on it,he still feels like the cul-de-sac is going to cost more than the $100,000 being donated. Kirchner hears that concern and noted earlier there was discussion about requiring the developer to pay for the cul-de-sac. This vacation would need to happen before a cul-de-sac would be approved and the Planning Commission approving a vacation does not necessarily mean that a cul-de-sac is going in next year,five years,ten years...it just means that the right-of-way exists in order to do so. Barnhart believes the intention is that the vacation would occur,and the platting would be completed before the street project next year. The intention of the engineering department is that the cul-de-sac and street pavement would occur at the same time. Gettman commented that the cul-de-sac seems to be an advantage for the public so he does not necessarily suggest that the developer be the one responsible for all of it. They are vacating part of the land and for utilities, for emergency vehicles, for deliveries,and everything else. Cul-de-sacs are things they are always asking for and in this case the road will get done anyway. The benefit for the public is to have a turnaround access as it is safer. He does not see the advantage of giving up the public access because it is one of two public access points to that part of the lake. That is his struggle with trying to combine them. Mayor Dennis Walsh, 1354 Rest Point Circle,wants to clarify the road.He asked the Commissioners not to forget that the City already owns the road that is all the way through the middle,they already have the easement to the right;they are only talking about approximately 25%of the cul-de-sac that Mr.Erickson will give the City the land for. If the City is responsible for all of the rest of the cul-de-sac,he clarified Page 7 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. they are only talking about a small piece of the cul-de-sac.He noted it is not an entire cul-de-sac as the City already owns about two-thirds of it,Mr. Erickson will just be giving the City the other one-third. VOTE: Ayes: 2(Gettman,Kirchner),Nays 3 (Bollis,Ressler,McCutcheon). Barnhart feels that Council should receive a recommendation either to deny the vacation outright or amend the motion such that there is a recommendation of approval of a motion. Gettman would be glad to amend the motion.He asked Staff what kind of wording would be appropriate. Barnhart replied"recommendation to approve the vacation subject to provision of a drainage and utility easement, a pedestrian easement, cul-de-sac right-of-way,and$100,000 or the cost to improve 1/3 of the cul-de-sac,whichever is greater." Gettman moved to add the additional language by Staff that the caveat of$100,000 or greater if it is determined that the cul-de-sac is more than $100,000. Bollis understands the motion as$100,000 minimum; if the cul-de-sac costs more, it would be in addition to the$100,000. However if it is less, it is still the$100,000. Kirchner clarified if the cost of the cul-de-sac was$120,000 the cost to the developer would be$120,000 and the City would net zero for vacating this roadway. He summarized that generally the Commission is supportive of the vacation,supportive of the right-of-way of the cul-de-sac,supportive of the drainage and utility easement.Regarding the pedestrian access,there are some dissenting but the majority of the Commission is in favor of that.The biggest sticking point is the monetary value and that could be something that the City Council is made aware of and can be a discussion for them. Gettman suggested denying the application as submitted. Bollis suggested tabling to allow the Applicant time to go back and present them with a plan they could approve. Barnhart noted the Commission reacts to the request in front of them,there is no negotiation.In tabling something,they would generally give the Applicant direction of what they want to see different. If the concern is the cost for the cul-de-sac,the City will not know until February or March of the next year and it is improper to wait for that. Staff's recommendation was supporting of the vacation independent of the $100,000,because the additional cul-de-sac width offsets any"loss"to the taxpayer.A cul-de-sac that provides easy access and turnaround for emergency vehicles,deliveries,etc...offsets what they"lose"for the vacation.He is hearing from the Commission that they are hung up on the cost for the incremental improvement; if that is the issue,Barnhart recommends approval independent of that and to provide a secondary motion for the Council to better understand the impact of the cul-de-sac expense.By that time perhaps they will have a preliminary estimate or expectation from the City Engineer that Staff can share with the Council. Gettman goes back to the motion to deny as it puts it back on the City Council that if and when they get that additional information,they are the decision-makers and the Planning Commission are making the recommendation;they have heard everything that they have said and there is nothing additional that the Page 8 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Commission would add if they even get that information the following month. He wonders if the City Council wouldn't be better off themselves getting that information and making an educated decision. Gettman moved,Bollis seconded,to deny LA21-000029 Bob Erickson,365 Westlake Street, Vacation of Platted Rights-of-Way—Westlake and Adjacent Alley as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 3 (Bollis,Gettman,Kirchner); Nays 2 (McCutcheon,Ressler) This item will be reviewed by the City Council on August 9,2021. Commissioner Erickson returned to his seat at the Planning Commission bench. 2.LA21-000045 REVISION LLC,4535 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,REQUESTS AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 47 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING DECK. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Jay Perry of Revision LLC,Applicant,was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis said the Applicant has requested an average lakeshore setback(ALS)variance in order to construct a 47 square foot addition on the lake side of the existing deck.A small portion of the existing deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback currently. The proposed deck extension is shown to encroach approximately 3 feet lakeward of the ALS line. The Applicant identified the location of the home to the west as the practical difficulty supporting the variance and has provided supporting documentation in the packet and should be asked for additional testimony tonight. Staff agrees that the home to the west contributes to the practical difficulty on this property and the curve of the shoreline also creates challenge regarding the ALS. They have not received any public comments and Staff recommends approval of the ALS variance as requested provided the hardcover not increase above the 25%maximum. The Applicant is showing 24.8%hardcover. Jay Perry,Revision LLC,Wayzata, is asking for the two feet to be approved,basically the size of the desktop in front of the Commissioners. If the home to the west decides to remodel or be torn down and rebuilt they can bring that home closer to the lake and by doing that, it would give the Applicant plenty of room to add the footage. They are just asking for the variance to get that extra two feet at this time. They do not need to put any more footings but are just cantilevering the deck outward. Gettman asked what is the actual difficulty they are trying to address in having those two additional feet towards the lake. Mr. Perry noted they are just trying to open up the deck. Gettman asked why two feet rather than five feet? Mr.Perry replied in cantilevering he can only go three feet and the clients just want the two feet. The extra two feet would allow a 24 inch table to be placed on the deck. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Page 9 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler is in support of the application and Staff's recommendations. They have seen other examples of applications like this that have been positively received by the City Council. Kirchner echoes those statements. Bollis is generally in favor but would like to note that in the previous applications the other house that could be built closer was extremely far back,so this is a little different. If they allow this house to go another two feet closer,that will change the ALS for the next house over more than it is today—and then that house can go two feet closer—which will change the next house and the next house. In general,he is not in favor of the ALS line at all as this will trigger a domino effect down the line.He would be in favor of the application. Gettman asked to pull up Exhibit G on screen and noted how much farther down the house ends up going or extending towards the lake. Curtis pointed out the homes on screen and noted the impact of the deck extension is kind of minimal as it is an angle across one direction rather than another. Bollis noted it would affect the ALS for 4515 and asked if that is correct. Curtis replied yes. Ressler said 4595 already has quite a bit of structure going lakeward so that is not a giant difference and adding that two feet does not appear that it would make a major change because of how much 4595 brings it lakeward.That is the reason it does not seem like a big deal to him. McCutcheon agrees with Ressler;the Commission has seen these before and he understands the practical difficulty to the house to the left and he noted it is not egregious as they are not asking the entire length of the house. Erickson supports the Staff recommendation. Ressler moved,Bollis seconded,to approve LA21-000045 Revision LLC,4535 North Shore Drive, Requests an Average Lakeshore Setback Variance in Order to Construct a 47 Square Foot Addition to the Existing Deck as Applied.VOTE: Ayes: 6,Nays 0. 3.LA20-000047 MATCOM OB/O CAMP TEKO,645 TONKAWA ROAD,REQUESTS HARDCOVER,LAKE AND AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCES TO PERMIT RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANDED BOAT STORAGE BUILDING WITHIN THE 75- FOOT SETBACK.(STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Mark Matasovsky of Matcom o/b/o the property owner,was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis stated Camp TEKO has been operating on the property at 645 Tonkawa since 1965. In 2019,they submitted a Master Plan showing a number of desired future improvements,including new buildings and a new trail network.The owner is working with a new architectural firm and the boat building,which is the subject of this current application,was not part of the original Master Plan approval,nor was it shown on the plan. The Applicant has begun to move Page 10 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. forward with the Master Plan.A portion of Phase One, including a lake access boardwalk change and reconstruction of the"boat building,"requires hardcover and lake setback variances. The rebuilt boat building is located 17 feet from the lake and due to its proximity is used to house lifejackets,paddles,and other lake accessories. The project will result in a hardcover increase of 226.5 square feet.The boardwalk increases the hardcover by 140 square feet and the boat building by 86.5 square feet. The Applicant's practical difficulty analysis and project narrative were included in the packet for Commissioner review. This current request is one of two structures along the shoreline; during the Master Plan review the City Council did not support modification of the eastern building and for that reason Staff cannot support the expansion of this boathouse structure within the 75 foot setback. Staff can support findings that support placement of dock sections providing ease-of-access to the dock in the water given the practical difficulties which include topography and existing site conditions. Staff has not received any comments from the public on this proposal and recommends approval of the hardcover and lake setback variances to accommodate the changes to the boardwalk which will improve safety and comply with accessibility regulations. However, Staff cannot support the expansion of the boat building as noted because practical difficulties are lacking. The boat building can be rebuilt in-kind and if additional storage opportunities are needed the Applicant should consider constructing a new building or expand an existing building located behind the 75 foot setback. If the Planning Commission identifies practical difficulties which support the proposed increase to the footprint and height,a recommendation for approval may be appropriate. Rabbi Marcia Zimmerman noted the camp has been in Orono since 1965 and is one of three congregations in the country within the Jewish tradition that have a camp. She hopes to give her overall perspective on why this is so important.In Judaism they have a sacred text called the Talmud which was written at the same time as the New Testament and says that they are required in their community to teach their children to swim because where the modern State of Israel is there is a lot of water there. Rabbi Zimmerman noted there is also a lot of water around Camp TEKO and no one guessed that Minnesota would have a Jewish population with so much water. Teaching children to swim is survival, independence,and is so crucial.Rabbi Zimmerman stated it is also allowing children with any kind of disability to have access to the outdoors and to learn how to swim, as well. In looking at this project,the first thing they did was look at the lakefront which is very important because they want to have accessibility down to the waterfront,they want kids to be safe,and 60%of their campers are 2nd grade and younger. The idea is that the boathouse and additional hardscape or seasonal docking would make sure that counselors are focusing on the safety of kids rather than carrying down lifejackets and oars,with K- 2nd graders. This boathouse will allow the camp to house all of that safety equipment for very young campers. Mark Matasovsky stated the grade there is incredibly steep and they have a set of stairs that goes up to the four existing cabins. In going back to the 2019 approval,there is a changing building drawn in there.He noted they are leaving the shoreline pretty much as it is with the four existing cabins and the changing building does not exist anymore and they do not even want to build in the bluff setback. They do need a larger life-safety storage area because with Staff carrying life jackets, oars,and items up the hill,the children aren't being watched. That building would have a tambour door the width of the building that would open up. Mr.Matasovsky showed illustrations on screen of what the new building would look like compared to the old building and noted there would be very little change due to the L-shape of the building. This would allow the Staff to be within the building hanging up life jackets without going up that set of stairs up the hill to the cabins. He noted they received funding for ADA accessibility and a number of paths are changing to have access for disabled children and wheelchairs. The seasonal dockage allows them to get a wheelchair across the sand to the dock and out onto the pontoon boat.The boathouse Page 11 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. falls into the same category.He understands the City not liking things within the 75 foot setback so he offered to go back 100 feet and not change anything other if they can just have this 86 feet of boathouse. Bollis understands the seasonal bridge and docks. He asked if this new proposed boat building would be ADA accessible, also. Mr.Matasovsky replied yes.He spoke with the MCWD and they are above the line so they do not need a permit.If one sees the lakeshore,they would not necessarily even know they were there as they keep a pretty low, quiet profile. Bollis asked with the new proposed building,if there was a camper down there in a wheelchair and they needed quick shelter one could wheel them into that building,and they would not be able to do that with the current building? Mr. Matasovsky replied yes. If the Commissioner saw the current building, it is hard to stand up in some spots right now. Gettman clarified if they kept the same footprint and just changed the building, it is the footprint that is the bigger concern for him.He actually lives right across the lake and he does hear, see,and smell all the different things every time the kids go out there. His concern is that it is sacred and with his comments on the previous Applicant,when one comes closer to the lake that is where the Commissioner's largest discussions come from because then everyone else is going to want to change and it is the domino effect. Gettman is still listening for practical difficulties because the camp could have motorized vehicles taking the kids up and down the hill and they would not have to store as much down there.He noted there are alternative ways. Mr. Matasovsky understands the concern with other homeowners coming in and saying they want a boathouse made into a home,etcetera,but they are not serving disabled or handicapped children under 2nd grade. Gettman asked if this camp is free for all children. Rabbi Zimmerman noted there are a lot of scholarships. Gettman asked if the camp is free for all children. Mr. Matasovsky replied not for all. Gettman stated as they were talking with the previous issue,public access is what they are referring to.He definitely appreciates it and he is not against children. So the Applicant is hearing it loud and clear,he stated they are looking at the overcoming practical difficulties for this. Ressler asked if the current versus proposed building is going any further lakeward than it is currently? Curtis replied no it is not. Ressler knows they have heard this application in the past and noted they are not going any further lakeward or increasing the size of the space and asked if that falls within building in-kind. Page 12 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Curtis noted they are increasing the size and showed on the screen the red is the existing footprint. Ressler clarified the new portion would not be going lakeward but would be going inland. Curtis stated the same point of setback that is existing. Mr. Matasovsky said the existing structure sits on concrete which is poured and the new building would be up on posts so water,air, and everything can pass underneath Ressler is familiar with the property and noted the bluff is right upon them so they cannot go back without digging into the bluff and asked if that is correct. Mr.Matasovsky replied yes,the gradient lines are pretty tight going up and the only spot they have is an emergency vehicle path to bring a large golf-cart/four-wheeler down there in case of an emergency evacuation. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Kirchner understands the good intention of this and the thought behind it,however,he does struggle to approve within the 75-foot lakeshore setback.They have had similar applications for boathouse structures in the past and that has been something the City and this Commission have drawn a hard-and-fast line on for the most part. He respects that there are disabled individuals and young children utilizing the camp and he thinks it is a phenomenal asset to the lakeshore.However,Kirchner thinks they would be ignoring a large factor in that approving this they could potentially have a homeowner come forward who has a disabled individual living in their home,or young children, and make the argument that they need their boathouse amended or improved because of a living situation within their own home on the lake. Based on the Commission's past history with these types of applications and his opinion with the 75 foot, Kirchner does not believe this is something that he could support but is open to hearing other Commissioners' thoughts. McCutcheon is the minority on this one and has gone on record multiple times. He noted they had a situation where someone with a boathouse and moved it back and City Council denied it;they just do not want any footprint to change within the lakeshore setback. With this one,there are kids involved,going up that very steep embankment,the Applicant is not asking for a lot,and he would be for approval of this, for the hardcover setback,the lake setback, and expanding the boat building.He likes the camp, he thinks it is an asset to the community,he likes driving by it with his boat and seeing the kids.Anything they can do to make that tradition continue and not turn into a bunch of houses,he is in support of. Ressler echoes McCutcheon.His question for Staff is do they set a precedent because of the different type of property that this is,and can that be something to lean on for approving such an application or does it still set a precedent for a residential application or is there another path they can take for a conditional use permit. Curtis thinks the findings that the Planning Commission cites with any approval or denial are specific to the property that is the subject of the application. She thinks they can craft their findings based on the practical difficulty but specific to the property and how it is used. Page 13 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler continued to echo McCutcheon's opinion that this is a unique property and its use,character, and feasibility for its campers is something that he is really supportive of. He would much rather see this camp continue to thrive and he thinks this will allow it to do so.He does not think that adding the additional structure will add an eyesore to the lake and is thoughtfully placed within the application.He is in support of the application because it is a unique campsite that is trying to find themselves in compliance with ADA as well as being able to accommodate young campers. Erickson does not see a practical difficulty in this; in order to qualify as a practical difficulty the result must be not for the convenience of the Applicant. When they say the reason they have to be in the 75 foot zone is because of kids running around while they are trying to carry lifejackets,but what he did not hear is that perhaps they should hire more staff to watch the kids. To Erickson, it is for their convenience that they can do these things closer to the lake than they are supposed to be and not take on additional staff to watch the kids. To him, it is a convenience issue which does not qualify as a practical difficulty. Bollis would echo McCutcheon and Ressler, and add that he sees the practical difficulty as converting this so it is ADA accessible not only for campers but also for employees working there. He does not believe the current configuration would be accessible to have a wheelchair come in,navigate the space,and then come back out. He thinks there are unique features to this being that it is a camp and not a private residence so he does not think they are setting a precedent there.However,he would like to note that the Applicant is going away from the lake with the expansion of it,and he also likes that they are not proposing to come closer to the lake. Kirchner's biggest hang-up is the expansion of the boathouse,he is okay with the boardwalks,it is strictly the footprints of the boathouse. While he generally supports what Commissioner Bollis said regarding making this ADA compliant,he has not heard that the Applicant has tried to repurpose the existing footprint and found that it is completely unusable to make it ADA compliant.Now the Commission is drawing an inference that they think it could not be made that way and he would rather hear that they have tried and realize there is no physical way to make the existing structure ADA compliant. Mr. Matasovsky noted an ADA restroom needs a five foot circle for a wheelchair turn and that L-shaped has no room for a five foot turn in it at all. The new shaped building would allow for a wheelchair turn around. Gettman thought this building was purely for storage and there would not be activities in the building.He asked if someone with a wheelchair would be turning around or if they would just be dropping off lifejackets and oars. Mr. Matasovsky replied at the front door they would be dropping things off,however if someone needed to be brought inside,the lifejackets are being hung to dry above the head.He clarified this year they have 50%camp capacity and they had trouble staffing that amount. Gettman asked if the Applicant has looked at trying to keep that same footprint and updating or upgrading it. Mr.Matasovsky replied they have done some drawings and looked at it. It then causes them to use the staircase and the one building that touches the 75 foot setback,they have to carry lifejackets up the hill and store it there.He noted they have quite a bit stored on the beach and they would like those things stored away and not have them out all the time. Page 14 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler moved,McCutcheon seconded,to approve LA20-000047 Matcom OB/O Camp TEKO,645 Tonkawa Road,Requests Hardcover,Lake and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances to Permit Reconstruction of an Expanded Boat Storage Building within the 75-Foot Setback as applied with the condition that the non-existing permanent bridge is to be removed seasonally. Gettman sees that the City will be losing the precedent that they already have,that they have protected and argued about,and he is not hearing the practical difficulty.He does not see any advantage for plugging in the seasonal dock as it will already be removed so he does not see the give-and-take on that. VOTE: Ayes:3(Bollis,McCutcheon,Ressler); Nays 3(Erickson,Kirchner,Gettman). Kirchner is hung up on the practical difficulty for expanding the footprint within the 75 foot setback. He hears the argument that it is a different kind of property but he does have concern that it establishes a precedent. They certainly have children under 13 and disabled individuals that use the lake,so to use that here,he does not know that it entirely fits. Ressler thinks they heard Staff share that same concern and what made him comfortable was that each individual property can be assessed based on its use. The only reason he would be opposed is because they do not want to set a precedent for another property and other applications. To him,it is enough to feel like it does not set a precedent because this property's use is different. Kirchner noted if the property were to ever change hands and become residential,they now have a structure there that is larger than what is allowed and would be grandfathered in. In 10-15 years down the road is anyone going to remember that the reason the Commission approved this is because of the use of the property?He clarified that even if the Planning Commission approves something, it is just a recommendation to the City Council and they may deny or approve it. McCutcheon noted this is a unique property,the City is pro-business,and it is a community asset. He suggested they could say if this ever became a private property that boathouse would not be allowed. Barnhart clarified no,they cannot. Ressler noted the Council can hear all of the comments made and they will do with it what they want regardless. Gettman moved,Kirchner seconded,to approve LA20-000047 Matcom O/B/O Camp TEKO,645 Tonkawa Road,Requests Hardcover, Lake,and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances and to deny the Reconstruction of an Expanded Boathouse Building Within the 75 Foot Lakeshore Setback. VOTE: Ayes(Erickson,Kirchner,Gettman); Nays(Bollis,McCutcheon,Ressler). The Commissioners discussed allowing hardcover rather than additional structure. Ressler moved,Gettman seconded,to approve LA20-000047 Matcom O/B/O Camp TEKO,645 Tonkawa Road,Requests Hardcover,Lake and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances with the revision that they would allow hardcover instead of additional structure.VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 4.LA21-000048 COURTNEY PAULSEN, 1090 WILDHURST TRAIL,REQUESTS SIDE YARD SETBACK,AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK AND HARDCOVER VARIANCES IN ORDER Page 15 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND STORY ADDITION WITH A NEW LAKESIDE DECK OVER THE EXISTING HOME. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) Courtney Paulsen,Applicant,was present. Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis stated the Applicants are requesting variances in order to construct a second story addition and new lakeside deck on the existing home including average lakeshore setback(ALS),sideyard setback on the north,and hardcover variances. The existing home is situated 2.6 feet from the north side lot line and entirely lakeward of the ALS. The proposed addition will occupy area within the required sideyard setback and ALS. The hardcover currently exceeds the 25% limitation and the Applicants are proposing a 170 square foot reduction. Curtis noted a 7.5 foot setback is required for the home. The second story addition will result in new encroachments for the second floor within the sideyard setback.The current plan shows the proposed deck stair encroaching into the sideyard more so than the home is currently.Upon receiving Staffs modification,the Applicant intends to modify the deck so it lines up with the setback of the home on the north and add a spiral staircase to be consistent with the home setback and not encroach more into the ALS. The property currently has 31.6%hardcover and the reduction of 170 square feet includes 123 square feet from within the 75 foot setback.The Applicant has identified the existing lot configuration,neighboring home locations,and their home's relationship to the lakeshore as practical difficulties to support the variance. Staff finds that the location of the home,the neighboring home, setbacks from the lake,the curved shoreline, and the narrowness of the Applicant's property create practical difficulties limiting all improvement opportunities for the home. Staff recommends approval of the ALS variance to permit the second story expansions of the home as well as the sideyard setback variance for the second floor. Courtney Paulsen, 1090 Wildhurst Trail,noted they would remove 120-some of the pavers to meet the hardcover and she spoke with the land owner to the north and they would be okay with the Applicant going flush with the north side of the house.They do not want to do anything that would upset neighbors as they plan for this to be their forever home and have addressed the proposed changes with both neighbors and so far they seem to be agreeable. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Loren Schoenzeit,4480 Forest Lake Landing,thinks it is important to note that the house at 4480 Forest Lake Landing is where it is because not shown on the survey,the City has a sewer for which they have no easement so their only building site is the particular location. Ordinarily they would ask the Planning Commission and City to enforce the ALS but the goal of the lakeshore setback is to preserve lake views and 1090 Wildhurst Trail is north of his house and the view there is not to the lake.He would request in the future if another neighbor is ahead of ALS that it would be preserved because it would challenge their view of the lake. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Chair Kirchner noted they are reducing hardcover and they are bettering a situation.He thinks this is something he could support as applied for. Ressler does not have any opposition to the application, it does not seem to impact the peace in the neighborhood, and allows more usability of the property.He is supportive as applied. Page 16 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Bollis supports Staff recommendations. Ressler moved,Gettman seconded,to approve LA21-000048, 1090 Wildhurst Trail,Requests Side Yard Setback,Average Lakeshore Setback and Hardcover Variances in Order to Construct a Second Story Addition with a New Lakeside Deck over the Existing Home based upon Staff recommendations.VOTE: Ayes: 6,Nays 0. 5. LA21-000046 CITY OF ORONO,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CREATE NEW AND AMEND LAND USE CATEGORIES,PRIMARILY IMPACTING 2060 WAYZATA BLVD W,3025 WAYZATA BLVD W,AND SHORELINE DRIVE IN NAVARRE.(STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) Staff presented a summary packet of information.Barnhart noted the City is proposing a Comprehensive Plan amendment that will create a new land-use category and amend three existing land-use categories. They are not proposing to change uses from commercial to residential or from residential to industrial. Rather, it is modifying within the existing framework of their land-use guidance.All cities in the metro area are required to update their Comprehensive Plan every 10 years; Orono last did theirs in 2018.As part of the plan the Met Council requires that the City provide opportunity to meet three key goals within the land-use plan. They must provide an average density of development in the sewered area of the City of 3 units/acre. The City must also provide 154 affordable housing units throughout the community;those areas that are guided for densities at 8 units/acre or more. The third requirement is the City must provide an opportunity to meet the expected growth in the 2020 time period and the 2030 time period.For Orono it was adding 225 units between 2020 and 2030 and another 340 units between 2030 and 2040. This does not mean the City can tap on any property owner's shoulder and say they must develop today;rather,they must provide the opportunity for that to happen. Barnhart explained within each density,Met Council only cares about the lowest density number.The City has tried to sparingly apply density in land-use planning to the area it is most appropriate,usually adjacent to highways,bus routes,employment areas, water and sewer areas. He explained the residential classes and showed them on screen contrasted with the proposed changes of urban estate,urban low,urban medium,urban medium-high, and urban high density classifications. The City Council directed Staff to look at the land use classes;these changes primarily impact two known properties:the Dumas Orchard and Eagle Ridge. Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. Jim Hillier, 1224 Briar Street,has been corresponding with Barnhart to make sure that the zoning density accomplishes the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and those conversations were around how they can make sure they do that. He was very happy to finally see this as he thinks it is long overdue. For years the City Council has been trying to get density and zoning aligned to meet the goals of the plan.He thinks it looks great,however,he thinks the City needs to do a better job of looking at all the opportunities;he brought an opportunity for the Crystal Bay neighborhood to do what they are doing here and expand opportunities for affordable housing. He thinks they must look at all of the opportunities and not just those identified here tonight.He is waiting for a response from Barnhart as to the Crystal Bay neighborhood because there are sewer stubs available,empty lots available,and there are others that need to be looked at. Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Kirchner thinks this is a good step in the right direction and can be supportive of it. Page 17 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday,July 19,2021 6:00 o'clock p.m. Ressler moved,McCutcheon seconded,to approve LA21-000046 City of Orono,Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Create New and Amend Land Use Categories.VOTE: Ayes: 6,Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS—Update on July 12,2021 City Council Meeting Barnhart noted the City Council reviewed four actions from the June meeting and approved all of them. ADJOURNMENT Erickson moved,Bollis seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:39 p.m. ATTEST: Kirchner,Chair Page 18 of 18 • Date Application Received: 07/21/2021 . j Date Application Considered as Complete:07/21/2021 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/19/2021 To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members y04. A Adam Edwards, City Administrator rikESHO- From: Melanie Curtis, Planner I'YiGG Date: 16 August 2021 Subject: #LA21-000050,Alyssa Dwyer& Eric Biermann, 2915 Casco Point Rd, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant are requesting lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore setback variances to redevelop the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant are requesting lot area, lot width, and • rar EXI5ING average lakeshore setback variances in order to ►�ousc 4 • redevelop the property. The existing home is situated "fOD ,;, �' ,/'•' almost entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore �g , `. 97 �' ,\\ setback line which, based on the location of the two adjacent neighbors, cuts through the subject lot at an111V angle.The neighbor to the south is significantly further vacoseo r �� from the lake than most of the neighboring homes ►,0t resulting in the extreme setback. There are no Rt,� -�� Din changes proposed with the existing improvements in s ti., ' . s„MINIM the 75-foot setback. sma <` ' .:Mrd Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the location of the home to the south as the primary practical difficulty supporting the requested average lakeshore setback variance. The existing substandard lot size and shape are identified as practical difficulties supporting the lot area and lot width variances. Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the orientation of the setback line resulting from the extreme setback of the southern neighboring home,the existing lot's substandard size there are practical difficulties supporting granting the requested variances for the new home. ALE#LA21-000050 16 August 2021 Page 2 of 5 • LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350—Setbacks: LR-1C District Required Existing Proposed Rear 30' 84.7' house 40.3' 9.7' detached garage Northwest Side 7.5' 12.8' 8.3' 5.3'chimney* Southeast Side 7.5' 3.9' 7.5' Lakeshore 75' 148' 148' house 142' patio Average Lakeshore The proposed home is located 31.25 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. *City Code 78-1405 permits the chimney encroachment into the setback. Section 78-350—Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 15,425 s.f. (0.35 acre) 60' @ 75'/ 60' @ OHWL Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: • Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 15,425 s.f. (0.35 acre) Allowed: 3,085 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,023 s.f. (13.1%) Proposed: 2,587 s.f. (16.7%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier Tier 1 15,425 s.f. 3,856 s.f. 3,407 s.f. 678 s.f. 3,832 s.f. 678 s.f.w/in (25%) (22%) w/in 75' (24.8%) 75' Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Sec 78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met;such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and FILE#LA21-000050 16 August 2021 Page 3 of 5 • 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for average lakeshore setback variance results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above.Therefore, lot width and area variances are required in order to redevelop the property.The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Sec 78-1279) The proposed home is situated forward of the average lakeshore setback line. The current home encroaches almost entirely into the setback as a result of the home on the abutting southern property (2925 Casco Point Road) creating an extreme setback line.The existing home is approximately 35 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line where it encroaches the most. The proposed home will improve that encroachment by about 3.75 feet. The subject property does not have frontage on Casco Point Road, rather it gains access across an easement over the property to the northeast(2917 CPR).The proposed home is shown to meet the rear setback of 30 feet and cannot be moved further from the lake. The home at 2925 CPR is set back from the lake approximately 213 feet from the OHWL. The applicant's new home is proposed to be 156 feet from the OHWL. Other neighboring properties in the area are situated between 140 and 150 feet from the Lake. The applicant is proposing to build the home almost in line with the majority of neighbors. The owners of 2925 CPR have submitted a written statement (Exhibit H)supporting the applicant's request and indicating that they have plans to rebuild the home on their property which is intended to be in line with the other neighbors. The applicant's proposed home will be roughly 10 feet back from the OHWL (138.4'), improving the average lakeshore setback and getting closer to conforming to the unique setback. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. FILE#LA21-000050 16 August 2021 Page 4 of 5 • According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The requested variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The Property has difficulties in its substandard area, width, and as a result of the location of the adjacent home(s). 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The requested variances to develop the nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of a new home on a substandard lot forward of the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable based on the southern neighboring home's location with respect to the lakeshore. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The nonconforming lot area, lot width and location with respect to the neighboring home were not created by the homeowner;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. • 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The Property's substandard size, lack of road frontage,orientation and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for the Owners in redeveloping the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The Property's substandard size, lack of road frontage, and the setback of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore variances are necessary for the preservation of the Property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the • FILE#LA21-000050 16 August 2021 Page 5 of 5 • requested variances in this unique situation would not be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The requested variances are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Public comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit H. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? • Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Project Summary Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Neighbor Comments Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map • 8/2/2021 View File Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/21/2021 • Address: 2915 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723310051 Land Use Number: LA21-000050 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN Address: 2915 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Alyssa Dwyer Company: Address: 2915 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 alyssamdwyer@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Eric Biermann eric.biermann@gmail.com Associated Contact: Mark Gronberg markg@gronbergassoc.com Associated Contact: Scott Bartz • autdes@frontiernet.net Associated Contact: Project Description: Build a new home on an existing lot(replace current home) Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: • https://www2.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=83848204&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 1/1 Project Summary We are proposing to tear down the existing home and garage which was built in 1941 and construct a new home forward of the average lakeshore setback on a substandard narrow lot.The average lakeshore setback is driven by two unique challenges: 1)the neighboring property at 2915 Casco Point to the South is setback from the lake over 200 feet and is not in alignment with all other homes in the area and creates an average lakeshore setback line that cuts through the subject parcel at a sharp angle and 2) if the home the home were to be moved substantially back,would not conform with City requirement for a building to be placed with a 30' setback from the rear. 2925 Casco Point Road was recently purchased by new owners, and have stated intent to rebuild the home closer to the lake and line up with how other homes on Casco Point Road (including ours)are placed. Please note our proposed plan eliminates a current non-conforming feature—side-yard setback to 2925 will move from 3'9 to 7'9 and will remain in compliance with other ordinances,such as building within the 25% hardcover limitation. Thank you in advance for the consideration! 8/2/2021 View File Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA21-000050 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality and will fit in with the existing homes and place this property in line with 2905 and 2927 and eventually 2925 when it is rebuilt (planned for the next year or two) and will remain within the hardcover limits. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Correct. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Correct. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Understood; this application is to ensure the new home fits in the character of the neighborhood. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight S for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Understood; not applicable. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Not applicable. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The property adjoining this home has a home that is set back further and than most homes in the neighborhood and will be repositioned in line with other homes when it is rebuilt in the next year or two. Furthermore, moving the home back would trigger a separate rear-line setback; conforming to both set-backs simultaneously makes rebuilding a practical impossibility. https://www2.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=83848204&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true 1/2 8/2/2021 View File 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. • Response: Most homes are located in the area share the same general setback as requested in this variance. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct, the granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. If approved, the home will be located with approx. the same setback as most homes in the area and will allow a new home to be constructed. • S https://www2.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_I D=83848204&ci Display=null&getPrint=true 2/2 SE66-ELPZS6:XYA 1.413,-ELYZ96:3NOHd 9SES9 NW'3)011 ONO,3AIH 1 MOIIIM'N StP Stl3NNVld ONTI'SNOA3MJf1S ONtll'SN33NION31IA13 T+tiw sanw V+n wS -.'3N1 •3NI`SI LVIOOSSV V D�139NOHO "aaa A Yme�n'wnglf vLep MP wap HA»a AVawVI 1,., ]C SNaSN3tl 3.0 U III a r x m � w it w LL Z m 4, Q , . aE :1-1N mma cmc ,jm aso`gym• $nm 0 0 o a�3 .` >+ m am aoo cu �. $1Z 1,,,,V- I-,-5 m oY «n U) m !"¢ �cc >Zf c am°a 1-9 H ? "ha vZa ' X n to= ¢ 04- iu O vN omo `` O. hifl 3 , oyo ' il ? ` i O °,51'z ?otS EEy T QO , 0 'ciir 'I ..s2=15.•-9 ooW P�'GO 8 i; &\ G \\\ 4" *. j as ; / \ N,_ Ali"\\ /4/ •S ` i q I( cc Z Z e >- Q ra r ) Y I 1 �`.s cc cc Q 1\ T IE '- \,' > 1•' F- */*,73.4 > Ci CC Q — Q w Z o '' 1 �\' > ,P ILI zx= V CC a 4 o Z - _ • w ,/ 4 �h ,. .a i 7 LL O w a - ti*,_ Po _�' '' zEin -.` cc w a XZz Ix 4i) _ -+1;•/%•,;,..,/,/,-;/,; O 0., Y a V a. .r; . 61 z Z waw �PG� •N. F«� � 0 Q 4 = l' r°' /,z ' ;�: Z Z > .'. .�'i ;' io H t= � %/ i w N / Z X % Z •'CC eca 2 C a 11,1,-CL4-Z56 VINLIZ Kai A.P."9."-.7 31°,°saw c..Wnla 5 1, 9SCSC WI.3)1V1 Oxo,3/1140 M011/91x1LON S„ ..,, '. Ir-1'� W. XsaaxxrIa awn .61:10AZACAS axr7'sxssxloxa'allo lL cI-c wt.»ow,n.t.",ns li 1.....a,Rry °a41iry po ' W 'DM 'S3,LVIOOSSV 4, `JHaamoaJ .1031`08d 1,ed.","",n"':.11Wpb:ea..°°iwl`Yuio°4-7, m •'"••-- u,n I Ill k rg o g2&6 y 1 , ; s Sag . d i g Ig 0'80 - 1 E ab"g $ u 6. S m ,, ai� •a 4 =1L € E oai6 d _ 58 F F ° n O d .. g . m- z55ofrfr C - b b g fr € o PrE .. OF` - 0 _ 6 6 € o F a 8 t d 4 € € - _ i s °g,° l`� o1. '3t 8 g„ : o o 71g, 040 �`\` i <'^: S S o g x g a"S; G oa s h:V gi `\ CO r-.\ o/ 1 ,.a. to \\ . CD41 \\ .\\\ n\\ o lir Y t. 0) \ i / \ \ • I111..,\''''',e'''. OM1 v p �` \\. I / Ca `p \\\ ` Ra" I ih z i \\\\ � N� co a \ \ i d E z • I I . \ i E Zw a � ZI 1\ I I / \` v�t 0,%‘=, `oar 6 V I I li \\ . ` /�}�. \� ✓ aux=V \\; i/'- C.] \ $c a a^ !g 1,,,. --_5i o r.„1 ."' L, b. ,. ;' W ; ., W F x ^'+ �!....4.-- `, ss 6 W1--1 W z-. \\\\ 11111 __ �, ''�/ i�i''•i 9 N a•! -/It U ad ' 3�r i i 0 F+i 0 \ a,., �i C'.‘ ‘ til �� ' [�] 9 4' 3 (/) �'., H i� :i i//;'-'---- � 9.-:,:.:. 4�;'i ice '��d/ w .a i k `• ii ?i;i - ' / �/ "1/4 Q W /' .0'C.' /' . . /:'�_�� Q' E:: z CI i C.;.;-e-. r i 1.-"'"....0"-....----. "'y �� rd z Q , \r X /, i// is E. EN c4 i 0 -=== =4— `', z � w a • F 0 a fr-, 0 f • `lZ/9Z/L0 7,38 90• 10/90/L0 638 8S �l3.lMa llcti– L8 (ZS6) ",u1 'alosauu'JJ Jo ( t ON X3 ) " ms�m......v d" �) .�../}(��/ -ON X30NI J A4 Zorra.= zom.W �srw.� 10/60/90 wed 95 / N ./13�-i \.J NW 1'11 n b' ' ;o ------------, ,tl3160 3dA1 N80, (03HSINlu Js L99Z)( S3140H 010Z13V9) ` ) 396d NV3d 4008 01 30680 83801 • ..B-.9C W 14106-0114 4008 01 30680 83801 Z. 2/1 1-20 ' . S 1NI0d-0114 4008 01 33680 3068366 a K 2/1 6-.60 W N63d 4008 01 30689 83dd0 ..o-.ee 1NI0d-0114 4008 01 30680 83dd0 2/1 11-.90 ' IiIIIIiIiIIiIiIiIiIIiiiiii1ii14hi:,I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�IiIiIiIiIiIiIiIiIIiIiIiIiIiIiI�IiIiIiIiIiIiIiIi'i'i'i 1.1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,„„,„,„,„„7, 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111blih1IIj111I11iddi1IIIIIIIIIIIlI11111Ihhhl 1111111111111111111111111111111111,Iq''` �o ` 1 IN ■_ ■ ./ 10 • \p�l 1i II I Ihj 1_ I■mI 1I `Z z ..11110110;IIIIIIIi4 i LI rrIhII . U.I o QIIS'•1111111111111111 ,1 ■■I I W z 0 °F-"6 y I 11 1, 1 �II ,II I 1�� J b E o o I I ,- o I I I I u��211 �� W m i 11 z gr I I a FF • � Iz1-b_ IIi'IhI on inI. N� a 'I ._ o I 1.111.11111. rc II I a I � . i IIIIIIIIIIIIIINL 11111111111111111111V-111• ._111 _ �' I� l � � II II � _ .I I II,II I , 'o _o Fg nw o� 0 �w �rc cwi Nog �o< a6 U2 a VV1l azo go • 7 `r 'Lz/ /Lo •A3a BS' ' X— 1360.0.IND kino MU SMIAVNO 3301 DI 1.1.531. - �r1 V Ali lZ/90/CO 'A3lBS 83,1\Ma L L —£LS (zss) ' / ' zOSaUUw eO 'ON X3ONI, TOM 5.5.10 X31100n . � _ , , ,VNd N013,70 N1-,Inln�` mr'iUfTVrt 00v t/0 =m Lz/60/90 mad 85 ' lc, 31VO 3dA1 NNJO, ( )( 53/10H 01OZ13VN) 30Vd) • • O. O. r110 OV �l o i �l o —1-4o 11111111111 1111111 i'i'i'iIi'iIi'iIi'i'iIi'i'iIi'iIi'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'iIi'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'iIi'i'i'i'i'i1i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i 'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i' 144hI14h4h44h'dd14'14h4hh1Ad144:i:i:i IIAIh'I'I'14'd14:1:1:1 4h4h44hh44h4h4h4h444hh'LIIy1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mai II 44h'I'1444 :1:0:044hhh4h444'14h'I'I'1444h4hh'dI'IMIy1I'dly:0:1 44h1:02 h4hh ai: m 4'111I'I'I'I'I'14'I'I'I'I'14444'14'14'144'1444'I'14'14'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'III'144444'14'14444'1444'I'I'14'14444444444 '1444'.III.VIII I'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'I'1'1I II I III I I I'1'I II II'144'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I I I'I III I I II I'I'I'1'I'I'I'1'I III I I I'1'I'1'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'III'I III I.III 'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'iIiIIIIIIIi'i'Illiii'i'i'i4'i'i'iii'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'iIi'i1i'i'i'i'111'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i1i'i'i'i'i'i'i4'i' o a I ih Lf1III LI LI LI LIIILILIIIIILI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LII LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI11LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LILIIILI LI CILLI LIII LI LI LI LIII LI LI LI LI 0 11111111111 1111111 o ~ W b I L n ■ II wUJ w N . 4/ ® i� 11 El _ „, BA 1 �U 1 ry� 0 _i.' NL 1 1 Ok J74. m ,...... .'.1 'L , ',41./\v/ ^'vvi'Ar'''1's✓f'''"'''''Tt% ti\ ,, , NDDDU gin, DODO • . ,,,,, -moo _ro ®®®® m DODO Ilml 1111111111111111 IIi DD (DODO NEEN z Io, 0 7o w 111111 �` w / w - 0 N , Iro I . N 1 1 Z . O LLI -J W W j CI 5 \ Ui 11 L� a - J �o L.� .2• -----F 1> N O m LIIIIIIIII` 7 1111111111 ' IP\ J-i a "10/90 LO 7‘38 EIS.. ' ` ' t—6LSZ - I0/90/L0 1138 GS 13,�Ma 1.1.2-17-2L2 (ZS6) DU] '0105ODU1(4 JO ` 'ON 03061 1tlNl3 NOIS3Q Nwninv ON ICJ 31815106.1 3113tlY Z/60/90 W,ad es ` ' • la 3vti. 310' lir rry . w.r 4�VI 9101533 .m sox \ 31.90 3d).1 N210,( )( S3110H 01071396) \ 309d/ III c r ac a ..8-.Sl rrh-A1 r.e-,Ll rr0 r.0-r6 rr0-r6 ..0 A /. A N ��_ AA A A a ¢- 1 7 / a I ;23JE' 1 ie A A r�Z T2i A Ytcoi bi ' gl .-c .Nn o oz r_ 'S:ro ° oW3�i x\obcoiO N.. N Z O I d l ac a oJm� - e E. 3� o U� r ..C_.S � rcw e m cc Alli 0.-c., DU ,i �m< �g g mW I� ~\Om y obU x I ,*•g y till aa� HW < 1 rr4 o..N o i� t o wz ` II ., ' �mti m ai II d UeQ N Rm yyy'\\+ ya\ F- `8."`61 :,, ogf- I ---- I v--•l I I n I\ /I O L ® JI LL I I rei,MN39 H3fll� `JJ \ I m I \VL I M� :a y �I 2'I+ m I o\\\ O G\Y! i\ < r +•j I p U) J r ,,41 F c �� p W , to CD �( z ,\�M DHy' 0 3 f, ci m, i. rn O O` z05`A1JI ao P �< • vZ 1310 IL11L1 / 'm o 1JJ JL=-I 2 1-- 9bSrN Fo I A a_ 6938 03dd020 i <a ,s� 6 /\ � b Zno� ti 3JVtlO1S A A mwzo e F -iNn 1 w:- i, -_a 1_.Z i Y v rN v I z 0 __ri, tib 4 / 0< 7;,- Z w 1 4- I r r.h- r.L 'r < -1\ t- s r.h-r4Z m 3=� ``,4-.l r.4-.9 �rr8-d / i �rU �� rr9-.LL mO Z 0 Uppm b ismN H W0 o. F Q Q ENI I N. W 3EO C N \ zao� br \ IP; Nr <Eg W gig �Om�Nm r UrUO amJ r,OmNm iH V m� Y YV \ N V V • .01-r£4 30.311 •lZ/9Z/L0 'A3l8 80 1 1-6L9Z -40 _ 10490/L0 'A08 9S 8L AMQ L - L8 (Zc6) ',u •e1osauuli4 Jo N rn��r ' ral I / ltlNLi \ +yam/ //-�� 'ON 030NI `.on WA 31061.00530 30 vto taxw°�m�a.o. tl 1ewma ,J `10/60/90 MllNd 85, / ` N J��J Nl.�n1 n'� ( J. 1010.1 31tl0 3dA1 Nal Nld i.t 3s 4941 S3Ml0H 01071309 J 39tld • a< >< at .A-,9l ..0-.0l ,.0-,9t -JII c 1.--/ ■ ■ IMM1 _A AAAA , v o n h in • 1L� il Y e A A A_A r - i___. _A-T 'Io NV, v ti „4-.Z j S N x W A_,9 oR.ma m a I <-z 3 m os�0 0_ Na II ,_NOU w Lo z !II 0 Oow a UU w`=K __ �u0O (0 `AS �Z� SQ2Kf, k. Z et &'.R3' -A ,o 252S' 1m b z 0 0 a M U�Um< El L _ r V V. z2wz N I A AT ��oaz I I m zgzm_ m I_ 0 I b n . _ o\ b F I I in \ami^ I J3 0 I m �r 6 m K d Y m W-27 4 g r NNI 0 fl 1, A z o,...io °, L__ 1111‘O n I x 1 V Y -�1 � Tip Z m 1 YMil S30688 01'14 oi o • _14_41__ o \ 4CC A _I o a S3A13H5 - // e U- _n _ b N3A0 316600 I i� b ? m o S1400 M HON36 O : m 3a / Z� V 1 U ..9-.CI � a S3A13HS W /3 a LL H M V a 1 0 V III •_. o tr --. ,0-.01 2 0 g0 a m b a o 1 y1o I I n 0 °~', 0_ Ill0 rc m 0 0 0 I'll' V a. ill W E V V V .4-.9 c a 4-.9 " 03-,tZ rIz/9z/Lo -A38 GS.• ° • r- ® LZ/90/LO 'A3a OS eiIAM0 ll217—cL8 (ZS6) I.•07osauuIW Jo X—ON X 1.11.110 VS.3.11 Cal 11121f0 su m uniskodow 3111 GI / / 1tlNl3 'ON X30NI AIN I.TIVISIIIUM.3111 YON Tam warn)mow. `lZ/60/90 Wlad BS C )C,._- ) N 0/s3Q NWnl n v ( )o ) )w a viol iox a nn xn n x>m xoom 3.ox 31tl0 UAL Na0 03HSINI3 3S£04l 53WOH 010Z13VW 30tld 1111 0-.44 1 I `el 1 A A A A A A Al1 n 0 1 �V c II uN Q I I zN W= K N I = N^ Q Z 1 „IN-2L „Z-,£t V)W o v oL ro tn0 f—A Z Cr Z � Od�v �� 7 � ` 7 OD7 0Z yo ° i m OO <� In CO M 0 N N v CD 'Nll A N t=i �J 1 A r 'nV vii t,`il 8 O lir I A g� 0 1 a 0 3 1 , \ I N3N11 J'� t NG V J L .-J _ U n = a / 7ir UCe AT, v - 0 1 NNHS O N 0 . ^ 1Lwal r I V 0 ... Li- o I ii /jS .SI en r- b Z O n 4Pa rNISO eru 019Ap0£ io .�. 11 „Y-,9 '„9 V) ..0-.6 I ,AI-,£ „S-.S ,,6-Q i s Y r 1 a- ,- „0-,L,0-,L 1 U OI g V O u o _I D Z C” n I O = N CO m I m P A 11 .i.4 m 1 o 01 A A V LL--- 17 i X r V r III „Y-.9 ac „Z-.S ,A-.£Z ' ,A-,44 Exhibit F • City of Orono �.9,o� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ) Property Address: 92 S C,t 1c o /c1T RD. ( Or-f/ 'clz i d/FR AGI, ` �F. �'tSH� Prepared by: G4avQ ER G if 4.S'FOc /Arc S, /A-1'. Date: 7_/.3.2/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) (Tier i) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: OPOSED HARDCOYE In the following to le, Iden i y a items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) L4'x 30') (720 S.F.) A fllOG[SE 0-rNlAfd, 2156 S.F. B CPV ER ED lo R C/1 S.F. / C //( ys 0 S.F. D D,tt1/t;rvw Y E B 047,e/ 1-1 c c _ X 5 3 S.F. 3 86 S.F. F r /J_17" Bogy'No1j- / 9j S.F. GE-A.vid)Ll y id4LIf A f'itT,c, _ 12 o S.F. H Aet-rio 4r /701Tfv4H rc. /o i S.F. I Ao!/c.O 61t ICE T, [4.1,1 4,4 26 S.F. J • • K ti ii .i ii Ii ., .-- / 2 !2 �f S.F. _ S.F. L LS.F. NI N S.F. N _ S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F._ S S.F. T S.F. S.F. u _ _ S.F. v S.F. Xw S.F. 1 S.F. Y Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover Yp 9 y S.F. ' Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): G PERI/lac,5' �t vER AATi v icr /Ota TA" j o O S.F. .? Bof DerA A6r_ t.414 Li_ 2 t S.F. J .0t -' .V /2 S.F. K wI ei ii _ /2 if S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 2 62 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line t1)] (4) Total Lot Area 332 S.F. /s,(/2 5' S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 2 41.8Y% 40 Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 City of Orono oNo. Hardcover Calculation Worksheet III Property Address: 2 9/5 ;� CilJ-co /94,/t.-7- ,404,0 (OwYCR) \-,-.4lf!_,,n/ ! Prepared by: Date: Git co Ai,Foe G f Ail a c i,4rrl', i.v �c_ —r'�- 7-/3-Z/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) er 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: XIST1NGHARDCOVER In the following table Identtry'a1l I ems of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key I Ke to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24`x.30') . . (720:S.F.) A ,yQkfE 9 9 2 S.F. B GARAGE Cyg S.F. C Court: AID l Q S.F. D A¢/t/ce.r1Ay 76.a S.F. E AR i C kAtiALS ---- -- /4', S.F. F 1700/° 2 y S.F. G 8A/ck BGKQ cA 55_F.__1 H A/c ,o., - - /0 S.F. 1 S-TaGA _ 2 9 S.F. J DCri< $y S.F. K 80AT//ou1 E 8 ,_S F._ 410 L .}'/DE[.vrf 4K /7/ S.l . M 8o'G/ETC 'ET. e-vAGC /Z S.F. N At �� 26 S.F. o !J ./ •, /2 y S.F. P PAT/0 /O i S.F. Q — — S.F._ R - —i -- —___S.F. S — )— —-- S.F. T • I ,F U I- S .F. ✓ . T S.F. W -- — -- S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z — ------ — ---- 5.F ill Total Existing Hardcover _ _ _ _ ,-3 W:2-- S.F. Excludab'le;Hardcover(See City Code S.e.c 78 1£684); _ _ __/_A't..-___ 1 gGOFR AFT. c4/44,4._ ' / S.F. __ - -------.__2,6_ -. _ - .._Q- — -„ " '' - -----/2'/ �F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover /6z -.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover jSubtract line 2)from line(1)] 3 Yo 7 S }�. ' � (4) Total Lot Area — ^— _ /S y2"t_S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)1-(4) IZ Z, o 9ot/oil 0 ___ (Proposed Hardcover next nage) January s,2013 ,..-‘,.....-,, . . ---...,,,..,;,4iLl'- '.'s,-...t..;044.......,,,, N-A-- • A - rte• ,4� 1 Y4.++r..•lt''', N' +`� ''- • r• .'14 •• ♦_ "\ a. / .P ..•,.. .f IIS 7bo. _ 141,,,._,..i.i minkfl` _ .•C�: WIPP _ . .. .. , „.,, . . _:,:, ?\... .e..... .i ,. `4 -,,, f. '1 4 F' --44„''. 4.. fix? d.' 711) V AN V '' • „,:,'-.•, �. •t, % ' ,,, t t� tee ,, ey a J t 1 tr'! , • � .v - 1 I, N., .` �.I f •`�� 'Rr '. i.,-,'i,,— —S-161-,-,f., . q*.i. • , L 4, S' , . . . . . • .. . .. _. T was � • ✓g. y 1 ♦ .. r - litilIN. 46r It, . /�,♦ '.'` - ,e ..`S •` ; 'AIF 4i; • : .r v Sit\ • 9 - , .40 .-!,k .„:-' ,, ,7'' ::. -, --._. ifti„. . ,-. , , , •_•.,,... ......„,,.. Exhibit I RUN DATE:07/21/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:I 38 20-117-23 31 0004 38 20-117-23 31 0032 38 20-117-23 31 0047 C A SPRINGMAN&J F KLICK EMMA LOU POWELL MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR • 3703 CASCO AVE 2916 CASCO POINT RD 2941 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOHN F KLICK EMMA LOU POWELL MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR 3703 CASCO AVE 2916 CASCO PT RD 2941 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0005 38 20-117-23 31 0033 38 20-117-23 31 0048 R PRESLER/E J PRESLER TRSTES PAULA N D KANNE/RYAN G KANNE NANCY G BROWN 3709 CASCO AVE 2920 CASCO POINT RD 2933 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT PRESLER PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE NANCY G BROWN 3709 CASCO AVE RYAN G KANNE 2933 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2920 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0016 38 20-117-23 31 0034 38 20-117-23 31 0049 CITY OF ORONO JONATHAN A MENTH DON ADAMS&SHEILA ADAMS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2930 CASCO POINT RD 2927 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JONATHAN A MENTH DON ADAMS&SHEILA ADAMS P 0 BOX 66 2930 CASCO POINT RD 2927 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0020 38 20-117-23 31 0035 38 20-117-23 31 0050 PENNY J SAIKI R G SORENSEN/S D SORENSEN JENNIFER BREKKEN LN TRUST 2874 CASCO POINT RD 2940 CASCO POINT RD 2925 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PENNY J SAIKI ROBERT G SORENSEN JENNIFER L BREKKEN 2874 CASCO POINT RD STACI D SORENSEN 2690 DEER RUN TRAIL E ORONO MN 55391 2940 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0021 38 20-117-23 31 0036 38 20-117-23 31 0051 CITY OF ORONO PAUL F JOHNCOX ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2948 CASCO POINT RD 2915 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO PAUL F JOHNCOX ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN • P 0 BOX 66 2948 CASCO POINT RD 2915 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0022 38 20-117-23 31 0040 38 20-117-23 31 0052 CITY OF ORONO J W DONGOSKE/P A DONGOSKE TODD M BALAN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3700 CASCO AVE 2905 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JAMES W&PATRICIA DONGOSKE TODD M BALAN P 0 BOX 66 3700 CASCO AVE 2905 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0023 38 20-117-23 31 0041 38 20-117-23 31 0053 PENNY J SAIKI PETER M GRAFFUNDER GREGGORY SMITH/MELANIE SMITH 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3630 CASCO AVE 2895 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PENNY J SAIKI PETER M GRAFFUNDER GREGGORY A SMITH 2874 CASCO POINT RD 3630 CASCO AVE MELANIE S SMITH ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2895 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0026 38 20-117-23 31 0042 38 20-117-23 31 0054 STEVEN G SIGAFOOS ETAL JONG DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN L D&K E ELSEN 2900 CASCO POINT RD 3600 CASCO AVE 2879 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEVEN G SIGAFOOS JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN LAWRENCE D&KATHERINE ELSEN 2900 CASCO PT RD 4700 COVEY TR 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 MEDINA MN 55340 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0027 38 20-117-23 31 0043 38 20-117-23 31 0055 CITY OF ORONO SUSAN C STIELOW HOME LLC ALYSSA M DWYER/ERIC BIERMANN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3650 CASCO AVE 2917 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO SUSAN C STIELOW HOME LLC ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN P O BOX 66 3660 FORT CHARLES DR 2917 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 NAPLES FL 34102 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0028 38 20-117-23 31 0045 38 20-117-23 31 0056 . ANGELA L WILSON NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN R E WOLFE 2910 CASCO POINT RD 2975 CASCO POINT RD 2871 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ANGELA L WILSON NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN RE WOLFE 2910 CASCO POINT RD 2975 CASCO POINT RD 2871 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:07/21/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 20-117-23 31 0057 38 20-117-23 34 0023 • ROSEMARY C IVERSEN CASCO POINT LLC 2835 CASCO POINT RD 2987 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROSEMARY IVERSEN CASCO POINT LLC 2835 CASCO POINT RD 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0058 38 20-117-23 34 0027 D R WELTY&M M JIN CASCO POINT LLC 3721 CASCO AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 D R WELTY&M M JIN CASCO POINT LLC 3721 CASCO AVE 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0060 J A MARTINSON ET AL TRUSTEES 2970 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JERRY&BONNIE MARTINSON 2970 CASCO POINT RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0061 J R MILLER&A R MILLER 2980 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN R&AMY R MILLER 2980 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0063 D-OARE TRUST/M W-ABBOTT TRU 2965 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DENNIS-OARE TRUST • MICHELE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TRU 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0064 T J OARE&L M D OARE 2967 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TIMOTHY JOHN OARE LESLIE MARIE DENNIS OARE 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0065 CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 THE CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0067 DAVID B ADAMS 2868 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DAVID B ADAMS 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0072 M D BARRETT&D M BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL D BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 20-117-23 31 0073 D C PALMER&T L PALMER 2918 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL CLEMENT PALMER THERESA LYNN PALMER 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • • Exhibit J Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/21/2021 '.),J'I ?7J_ Ff3.? oa, 3759(tot aq 3753 27U4 ui 2829 N. n Ku :•a 3650 817 i•'' ligi3746091 37Q3 2825 pp 36 p 3G '� 2869.n.. 3cG0 A 2825 h)2829 � 7 1974 2835 FI 70, f56 287: CaSede* tll_k. prm� 'i6 2912 ' Oh COI 28101 2920, / 287:1 ,ati 7955.i5] 2.a17 • ti) `s ,• it oil63064 2509 ' ir 1 ! 25411 SII r.. ai., 9915 2Jr5 wl 2927 0 .. M /1254e ,k, 2933„43, ti A, 2971! 29411 WI 2967,xc+r : Ir. . 0 ;0000,0„. ,„ ?al ]75;3 O. .A al110” -r 2987 Rei 3005 $A1 3015 ", 3.33:.: 3025 3='4 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 11 I 11 1 1 t I 2915 Casco Pt. Rd. This data () is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; Qi)is fumished with no warranty of any • knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engneering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info©h en ne pin.us • Date Application Received: 07/21/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete:07/29/2021 %V0/ 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/27/2021 O To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator �� 4kEsHO From: Laura Oakden, LLo Date: August 16, 2021 Subject: LA21-000052, Petit Design-Barry Petit, 3355 Crystal Bay Rd,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting side yard setback, hardcover, 75' lakeshore and roof eaves setback variances to allow for an addition to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval for a home addition and hardcover within the 75' lakeyard,side yard setback and overall hardcover to exceed 25%. Staff does not support the roof eaves encroachment variance into the side yard setback. Background The applicant proposes construction of a 831 sq ft addition onto the existing 815 sq ft home. The addition will include 2 garage stalls and living space on the 2nd floor. Also proposed is a new • front walk and driveway,within the 0-75 lake yard. The existing attached single car garage with roof deck is proposed to be removed.The applicant has designed the addition to follow the average lakeshore setback for the property. The lot is substandard to lot area,width and currently has hardcover and building encroachments within the 75' lakeyard setback and side yard setback. UM WI...) x f :�" e. �s The addition is proposed on the lake side of the -'...--- :-.-5* ,".M N1'9 `s home. A portion of the existing home sits 3'from -.43'i Cr' ,4 .,;,�,%is the west property line and 7.4'from the east W,,$ ;g".4.54 �' � property line. The applicant is proposing to it remove the 3' side yard encroachment along the -towqr V,�� \ 1 1 � _ west property line and wants to maintain the w� " : \ a 9,e • 7.4' eastern side yard setback to allow for the oo (o) _ additional garage and living space. The new n..'\ \( tt, 'Average Lakeshore ..- - 940, I addition, driveway and front walk are within the %, Setback PROPOS 1 75' lakeyard and will increase the hardcover for _. a ,...noN-. 9424'.....,. �., the property to 52.6%.The proposed project will 4*'' (B) - meet the structural coverage requirements and °°"`"_. . ` 0 .�` .• , , the average lakeshore setback. 75'Lakeshore Setback �% FISTING HOUSE 83355 ., The applicant is also asking for a 3' roof eave EXISTING -- V (A) along the west property line. The code allows for 0359 ,"p .. r up to a 2' roof eave to encroach into the setback. m '"°' (Et 0,tip The applicant requests a larger eave due to the 80 9`$41 • design on the proposed addition. 1 te1�!.t LA21-000052 August 16,2021 Page 2 of 6 Practical Difficulties Analysis • Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the substandard lot area and width and the existing conditions for the current home as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. They also noted the access to the property with respect to lakeshore, Crystal Bay Road and the Dakota Trail. Additionally,they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty,Staff finds that there are practical difficulties in the lot's size,width, and the configuration of the existing home and access to Crystal Bay Road being completely within the 75' lake yard to support applicant's request for side yard, hardcover and 75' lake setback variances. While the proposal doubles the size of the home footprint, it is in character with the other homes in the neighborhood. Staff does not support a 3' roof eave encroachment. The code allows for a 2'eave encroachment. The applicant has stated the addition roof eave encroachment is due to the desired design of the home,which is clearly based on convenience,and does not meet the practical difficulty standards. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350—Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Rear 30' 9.5' No Change Side(East) 7.5' "'3' 7.5' Side (West) 7.5' 7.4' 7.4' • Lakeshore 75' 65' 59' Average Lakeshore Met Section 78-350—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 4,593 s.f. (0.1 acre) 47 @ 75'/ 29.8' @ OHWL *As with other lots on Crystal Bay Road, in evaluating lot area and hardcover,we do not include the square footage of the improved drive lane of Crystal Bay Road. Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 4,593 s.f. (0.1 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. Existing: 815 s.f. (17.7 %) Proposed: 1,646 s.f. (35.8%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 4,593 s.f. 1,148 s.f. 1,816 s.f. 2,416 s.f. Tier 1 s.f. (25%) (39.5 %) (52.6%) • LA21-000052 August 16,2021 Page 3 of 6 • Applicable Regulations: Side Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-350) The property is roughly 42 feet wide at the average lakeshore setback which presents challenges to allow for 7.5' side yard setbacks and a 2 car garage.The existing home is 3'from the western property line and 7.4'from the eastern property line. The applicant is proposing the remove the encroachments along the western property line and build the addition to meet the 7.5' setback. The applicant is request to maintain the 7.4'setback along the eastern property line and allow for a 2nd story to the home in this space. Hardcover; 75-Foot Setback Variances (Sections 78-1680&78-1700) The property's±120 feet of depth is challenging, particularly due to the applied average lakeshore setback at approximately 70-feet from the OHWL,the 75-foot lake setback, and the 30-foot rear yard setback.The required setbacks leave an approximate 15 foot deep building envelope. The proposed addition maximized the allowable building envelope and is proposed to encroach into the 75' lake yard. The applicant is working to build the addition to follow the neighboring homes and to meet the average lakeshore setback. Part of the existing home to be removed encroaches into the 75-foot and the side yard setbacks. The new addition is proposed to meet the average lakeshore setback and will encroach approximately 15 feet into the 75-foot setback. A new driveway and front sidewalk are also proposed with the project. • The proposed hardcover level of 52.6% is a 600 square foot increase from the existing conditions.The increase is primarily resulting from the increased building and driveway coverage.The proposed home is nearly twice the size of the existing home.The old driveway only served a 1 car garage and the proposed driveway will service a 2 car garage requiring a larger driveway. Eave Encroachment(78-1405) The code allows for a roof eave to encroach up to 2 feet in the required setback. The applicant is choosing the design the home with an angled eave that will be 3 feet in width at the widest point along the eastern property line.The wider eave is proposed on the same side yard where the applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance. The wider eaves is a design element and not necessary for the use of the parcel. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. • Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, LA21-000052 August 16,2021 Page 4 of 6 subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a • variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot includes difficulties in its small size and width, manipulated topography,and proximity to the lake. The lot is also challenged by Crystal Bay Road which runs through the lake yard.The average lakeshore setback is proposed to be met protecting views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the addition to an existing home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake,and side yard setbacks,appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, Crystal Bay Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties. The hardcover encroachments proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. The roof eave variance to allow a 3' encroachment request is not reasonable as a design element on the home. • b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The uniquely small lot size, width and location to the lake and roadway within the LR-1C zoning district standards prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed hardcover level are unique to the property to serve the proposed home. The roof eave design is created by the property owner. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of an addition to an existing home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as single family resident is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 4111 LA21-000052 August 16,2021 Page 5 of 6 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, Crystal Bay Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, Crystal Bay Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. However the existing home location unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting side yard, hardcover and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant.The eave encroachment is not necessary for the enjoyment of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested hardcover,side yard and lake setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for lakeshore setback, hardcover and side yard setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The roof eave variance is a design element for the proposed • addition and acts as is not necessary for the use of the property. It acts as a convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Engineer Comments The City Engineer has not reviewed the proposed plan. A thorough review will be conducted at the time of building permit. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? LA21-000052 August 16,2021 Page 6 of 6 Planning Staff Recommendation • Planning staff recommends approval variances as requested as they are supported by practical difficulties. If the planning commission makes the same conclusion, approval may be appropriate. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map S • Letter View Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary likplication Date: 07/21/2021 Address: 3355 Crystal Bay Road Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1711723410024 Land Use Number: LA21-000052 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: JEFFREY DONALD HEMENWAY Address: 3355 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Name: barry petit Applicant: Company: petit design Address: 420 Peavey Ln Wayzata,MN 55391 winpet@aol.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: barry petit winpet@aol.com Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Garage, Living Room and Bedroom addition Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application Conditional Use Permit El Site Plan Application Subdivision Application El Subdivision Exception Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application CI (Yj Applicant Signature: 14\ 0 file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(10).htm[8/12/2021 1:44:50 PM] 0 Variance Requests for Jeff Hemenway 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, Minnesota Narrative: The current house is quiet modest and lacks many of the spaces and expectations found in contemporary residential design. The Owner has chosen to remodel and expand rather than tear down. The current main-level living space is approximately 800 SF with two small bedrooms. The lower level include a single car garage of very marginal (unusual) construction and a storage utility space. A new two-stall garage will be added along with a more gracious entry. The main level will 1) expand the kitchen, 2) create a more defined dining room, 3) add a main bedroom and 4) recreate the deck S Outline of Variance Requests 1 Increase hard cover: 52.78% zoning = 25% 2 Side yard setback: 7' -4 3/4" zoning = 7' -6" (See page 3 for explanation) 3 Lakeshore setback 59' -2" zoning = 75' 4 Eave overhang 3' zoning = 2' (See page 3 for explanation) 111/ Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 1 Letter View Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA21-000052 . The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The use is permitted 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes: The properties along Crystal Bay Road are old plats that typically pre-date contemporary zoning and thus many of them have required variances to make changes 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: No 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variances are necessary to virtually do anything with the current site. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. *sponse: As stated the challenges stem from the fact that this neighborhood was established before *sponse: zoning. Changes become very difficult because many of the lots are substandard and - many cases - need severe relief to make changes. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The use is allowed 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Remains a single family home 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Yes. Many of the properties along this road have required variances 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Yes. The restrictions on this lot a very similar most of the other sites along Crystal Bay Road. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(9).htm[8/12/2021 1:44:51 PM] Letter View Response: The requested changes help transform the current home from a worn out 'cabin-like' structure to a environment that meets the expectations of contemporary home design. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, • morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: It will not. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The main level is 800 SF. Example of the core changes include increasing the kitchen to replace the 10.3 cubic foot regenerator with a normal 24-25 cubic foot capacity. A master bedroom will be added. The current largest bedroom is 123 SF with virtually no closet. One of the current small bedrooms will be changed into an at-home office to accommodate the work pattern of the Owner. The poorly built single-car garage will be replaced with a two-car garage and a new convenient entry into the house directly from the driveway will eliminate the awkward steps. The deck has deteriorated and needs replacement. A dining areas will be added. Currently there is no dining space. Even after completion the main floor will have a single bathroom. The two small bedrooms will accommodate S • file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(9).htm[8/12/2021 1:44:51 PM] CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JEFFREY HEMENWAY OF LOT 11, WALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY 929.4 CONTOUR / a` LINE (O.H.W.) �`i`e{tS,.y. H yTj S. /9 i--i ` - LCt' iP -• "932 C.( �y�. ,NMT v , Y" \ SAS "i� . p,9 q \� w Op Roga�r / X11 � �' .� ut —' \ PROPOS��''''''pppppp /\ DRIVEWA� \--"91')C41. . (D) /mac ` /'J SETBAO- O(K \ /-,-..„,"3941. / .C!'-' a Average Lakeshore 1 V V 4 �s�940 EXISTING Setback I PROPOS ! - _ lcs� HOUSE ¢ \ n+TION 7- 9 #3349 ,��5.- (B) / /•. • 42-- • • SCREEN PORCH •� t' \eo ,V/ '44.0) IA ^1 75' Lakeshore SetbackISTING 1 HOUSE CI) .... #3355 ., • EXISTING � s (A) •• p4. HOUSE #3359 (r0 ELAcsraNE ee1e)PA(TE) 6 16'.., 0 20 40 80 m ° C9 ° wrtlrt�+l• �� 41� ..N.N.N.+� �� , SCALE IN FEET ,tie C,,6%. 0t~.cs� SHED' Q ./.0%,,W. Q 1 �gg p J� ;SHED 944——— LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : l�p�°�P Lot 11, WALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH o : denotes iron marker • : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum —19301 : denotes proposed contour line Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, spot elevations, topography,all visible "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed addition, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 21007A2SCA 7-21-21:PROPOSED ADCnaN 7-29-21 41, I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report SCALE G R 0 N B E R G AND was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1"=20' ASSOCIATES, INC, and thatoI am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. DATE CONSULTING ENGINEER , LAND 5-17-21 SURVEYORS, do SITE PLANNERS ,7/4.,../....X.,...4 , lea No. 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 """"'� 952-473-4141 Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 21-007A 21-007A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JEFFREY ��T�� HEMENWAY �� OF LOT 11, YYALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA �� LAKE MINNETONKA CRY0TAL BAY �r I� YwA0,3<l' 4 z, 0_ , , ,„...,, ,., • • i . • 0 • #3359 (k0 PATIO4 ,1.Pr. Nmmi�mm��m m..�� ```. _—'^/� \ �~ SCALE | N FEET "\-4 t';‘) ' V.I.SHED <I,' �� 0 `, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : w~ Lot 11, WALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH o : denotes iron marker • : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot o|ovotion, mean sea level datum --o1r--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum --- 19301 : denotes proposed contour line Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing houoo, spot e|ovotinn,, topogruphy.o|| visible ^hurdoover^, and the proposed location of a proposed oddiUon, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. ,.===� ��|.�°�==M� G ��'�T�T�� AND that this �= �� ^^^°~^��^^^��~~^ ^�^,^^ °=" n�v="^ *, �� "�° supervision, �^~uo �N�� ""u ��^ / °� " u"°".°u �""^ m",°v", ""^", �^" INC laws °, m" sm^°"��w/"""""�"� DATE ASSOCIATES, ^^` ^'` 5-17-21 CONSULTING LAND noav�rnmm ao�zop��m�oo *m �m� *�vw ��vsmw �m^ ww ^^ovs ��°�~~v� JOB NO. 952-473-4141' ' � Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 21-007A c1—oorx CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JEFFREY HEMENWAY OF LOT 1 1, WALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE MINNETONKA CRYSTAL BAY 929.4 CONTOUR\ // 6; LNIE (O.H.W.) /�i �Bj 4k `S v., wso, — r)Tww 1 T`‘S, ` 7 e -- / NR6 * • , - / PSE A11i.%�j i _ =•�} (D) sp a".�. 8� 4 BLACKTOP t o� �� DRWEWAT -- • • �: cit, r 94O EXISTING 4, NE , s HOUSE 4L.. °dARAOE 11. .,.- ts-..i: - �\.. #3349 FLOOR)•',a 147' / o �� SQEEN \ .�/IOwER MAN tOROM •�E\VACE ECK FLOOR= • �• (944.0) .� EXISTING p HOUSE • • #3355 .` '0J. I�0 � EXISTING s (A) • HOUSE o '., • 1";;) 3359 Fucsrorc J 0434) (r) u 6 1 0 20 40 80 o .-011,4/". O 1.00 • X,41 • �� fti • �5 p� SCALE IN FEET y, p, C 0 9 0 SHED 44, l^_O 1 . �� RP l SHED . S : V P 4-6\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 11, WALLACE' S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH o : denotes iron marker • : denotes iron marker found (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ---917--: denotes existing contour line, meon sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, spot elevations, topography and all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. G R O N B E R G AND I hereby certify that this pian, specification, or report SCALE was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1"=20' 1110 ASS 0 C I A T E S INC C. and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the o lows of the State of Minneesoota. DATE CONSULTING ENGINEERSI, LAND 5-17-21 SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 2 ' ', /_ _ JOB NO. 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE. MN. 55356 ""`r"�' 21-007 952-473-4141 Mark S. Gronbera Minnesota License Number 177.55 Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road, Orono, MN July21 , 2021 0 Driveway 374 SF • Grass 2,723 SF 929.4 CONTOUR /moi �`�� Sidewalk 162 SF LINE (O.H,W.) �� it �o '. 0,./..-_--",:. � • House / Garage 1 ,054 SF .,..►,,,,, 9�Z,�--- OP , •�O 'J` Total Site Area = 4,434 SF �.) 4 L" •J� .• . . • Total Hardcover = 1,590 SF ��,� �� % Hardcover = 35.9% `�€iiR '.1: • • • I\\ \ 794OT SE eA5.1 w / TING s Sr • r:.. •GARAGE \ /-.,4 •' -- _ FLOOR. .Y . I (934.9) r'r, -_i - / 0 9A51 ••• N 13 LQWER • +� 0 GARAGE II LLO�OR- 1'Ci1 *I/4ECK '. e� co y� AROvE (94♦0) fl - EXISTING • Y , HOUSE ,�, • #3355 n'' 3.s, • • (A) 94 r��p • (c)'#` PATS Torg N,, -. (99 j (F) 1c1\•C;) 01091'. i • • /�'� b° Existing Hardcover Calculation • 8 Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road, Orono, MN July27, 2021 • Driveway 543 SF Grass 2,221 SF 929.4 CONTOUR\� /�... (s" Sidewalk 33 SF LINE (O.H.W) / io , :N Addition 827 SF /ut` j ‘s • . .//../t 1 M• •_.------- 1:11,110 (Sy .• � ••932 � ��N S Exstg House 806 SF {� 'st HYD'D'T ASo f� Oma, Total Site Area = 4,434 SF 1..,_% Y r g y%. r Rte. Total Hardcover = 2,209 SF Rp • r,•k, .._... �� (i) hHardcover = 49.8% '__ ._ti R „. 1� o,) . . .• ... x / p is '-. �P O : oNCRETr ESA N o • I.vEwAr j !. 9l ACK TOP (D) ZC 0 •$f,r 6, • DRTvEWAY �% • c / ga4- TING •, :''SNT HAC)E� !/r J� "E . SE • •... i }\ "GARAGE f d r gad y' rLObR= 17(rf� .'1 "� "tr, (6Ss t, eF, t? A.1 f pwFR AIA* �{„ � GARAGE r pt` fp CARAE K .•. X94 ) 13 �p EXISTIv. NG `s"� HOUSE I-, k 3355 gs . g� , • rLAGSTONE .(G) PATO el C:,.• (943 6) (F) b' kcP °T 01 • .•" 7 . Proposed Hardcover Calculation Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 9 The actual eave a �_.. s dimension at this r'x .'. kciIt3. point is 2'-10.75" ; j III / \moo . i4c5'-' Point where eave ,/ ip crosses over the 75" foot allowance ,-,:), -(i'. ) 0\)\- N'tk\° c.4§6 A g4 . _ --- 9u4 ihlE TP , • ..„_ — ..of tt) ( � , ~ '1 As indicated in the 0 i - t36 photo the existing *F Rrola, .4- eave is virtually 1RA{;E MAIN flush with the siding. UUR "DECK • •KWE (944.0) ��' -' EXISTING ,/ ,, „v....7-, t,.. ,:,*1.,,.:; - ,.., . , .. , . . ., .:., , , ... }}} 1'11 W� li 1. .. ..._ _ . • ' \,..---t..... ...._ .„._:,7,z.,,,,,-,..: _ pr'� _'� 1 LL- it ., 1 e . _ . el 11 K , + ,, . 1 ) , i„, e.,,,,,, , „._, .,,„ .. ,,„ ,.. ,4 • Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 1 3 Exhibit D • c,hoc kcld: dtl hal 2 k d by Eclisse to eq 3" EKC 4296 %. J 2 • N I 2zchmg 1,. 9' i x•63. 2$. broom fin con< 20' .'! 2 rs $mg the grade la detelmine the core coursing At this corner the existing house is 7' -4 3/4"from the side yard.Zoning allows 7' -6" .We would like to start the new foundation at this corner which places the addition 1 1/4"within the setback Starting at this line the new wall angles in to parallel the side yard property line. • We are requesting that the roof eave is allowed to continue straight in order to keep the roof structure a simple geometry.This means The overhang increase to 3 feet at the lake-side elevation. `t4•y I .g_ • Variance Explanations Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27 , 2021 3 0 a ;it t!.,.1.'11 ltil :11' ll i' T. iii: ys j i. ti111'11 t iii i � d I j JfIA t cs y '' 1 j ,`. • t iii PR'' / ti- • ' ,w ,' r • ;, ski • .t.' 3 ! -0 1'7 i1 s _ tat U r, a .` k 'i (Asha • • � f,. 'y `4 f - Image • Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 4 �., 0 • Vis. I. ar s 2 ii IL West Elevation Scale 1 / 8 " • i 1 1 I l f 1� . f i d { 0 i • East Elevation Scale 1 / 8 " 5 Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 • T ii + 4 .. , x r N Ni ' v� I 5v Lake - side North Elevation Scale 1 / 8 " 11110 i Allihith_ ill ' Ili I li l I�� . !I Ii ;i South Elevation Scale 1 / 8 " • Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 6 27 _.__ __. __ ......_......... i __._original dim pi was 3'-8" as pei • , can p water 0 . - 22 consider theis entire area as an extension fir of the garage clear head drain room under stairs approx here 577 SF unex 18' dr typ car dim Is 6'x 16' Garage Level Scale 1 / 8 " 1 ioB E I 111111 6'high partition LP44"x 80" grille :h''. dining fable 40•• cable ___ railing I ., cable rolling ■ El: 4 i Limie'l • immms]Lomm II ( UIIII' __ ' I I 4'barn door 31"opening enough room " for a lounge IA office with . choir. .r • fold-out - r bed den w/fokf-out • a �I bed. . O • ___,,,,,... it, Main Level Scale 1 / 8 " Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 Exhibit E City of Orono ,i1.0.-iii, , Hardcover Calculation Worksheet • KProperty Address: 'IS `.z 33 SS C.<rfTAC. BAY Re . 67ricg 1/e41 E'Avui t 4r) 't HJ✓ Prepared by: Date: Grco,, 'cit c ,' Aliociii rF,r ' - c . 7-29-2/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: ROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify a items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width _q 24x 30') (Square Feet) (Example) (Garag -� ' (720 S.F.) A Noziff (EX/.7/A/ ,) _ $i5 S.F. a /rt oPPrce A De i T-i orV $?i S.F. c A/t&Parc, 44.4c,K .39 S.F. D /�fat0 ve ,OAtt/f S0/ S.F. E FLAG rroN- A,"re o (6Xr.P-ri,, cJ 2 2 4 S.F. F AlC AAO r Y S.F. G H _ S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. 0 L S.F. N S.F. O — S.F. P _ S.F. Q S.F. S.F. R S S.F. T S.F. U - S.F. v S.F� WS.F._ x S.F. S.F. Y Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. 2 Y/6 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover (Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 2 0 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 1''i/A./4S .6L„t CI<7-GP FOR CAYUr/c. 14,7, /0 _ Y55.1 o S.F. S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)j 52_ 60% 0 Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 • r . ✓ r� _ '?- i s > ..' ;4 t. --., Via r y, .1-, ` . ji� t 9 f 7 tst s 41111t 4 r �yr*-, !-I' 4 ;' } S illi,111 IP lei*. , y 44t * 4litt aze . „le, .,4, 4*... .1).4 ..,1 `.— ,. ' '- y..., ,ate"+ e r . ,..-• . ..t ,..-• ,3,-..„,,re"„:- te ‘kio, 9000. i .. , ,,,..,, „ , ,... ,_. t 01844r. dr 'A , 4 t I. ii 40 , , r 6 32.4% 41% 47.6% 58.7% 46% 56% 48.4% 52.7% 53.4% 47.2% 39.8% 52.3% 57.5% 60% Comparing the Hard Cover percentages on 14 neighboring properties. The average hard cover is 49.3% Median Hard Cover is 50.4% • Figure Ground Hardcover Comparison Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road, Orono, MN July27, 2021 1 0 City of Orono Otic Hardcover Calculation Worksheet III �' Property Address: `� 3355 Crystal Bay Road ^ :° Prepared by: Date: Barry Petit July 27,2021 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24' x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C Lawn Area abstract shape 2,726 S.F. D S.F. E Existing House Structure 22.5' x 36.2' 815 S.F. F S.F. G Existing Attached Garage within 75' 11.3' x 22' 113 S.F. H Existing Attached Garage beyond 75' 11.3' x 22' 135.6 S.F. I S.F. J Asphalt Driveway within 75' abstract shape 374 S.F. K S.F. op L Air conditioning pad 2 x 2 4 S.F. M S.F. N Sidewalk within 75' abstract shape 163 S.F. O Sidewalk beyond 75' abstract shape 81.7 S.F. P S.F. Q Flagstone patio abstract shape 226 S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z (1) Total Existing Hardcover [ 1,905.3 Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): 1 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2)from line (1)] 1,905.3 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Not including Crystal Bay Road 1 4,593 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) _ (4)] 41.5 % ill Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 City of Orono 41(.0A,,- Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 3355 Crystal Bay Road nc' Prepared by: Date: p Barry Petit July 27,2021 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey(must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C Lawn Area abstract shape 2,221 S.F. D S.F. E Addition within 75' approx 17'x 29' 457 S.F. F Addition beyond 75' approx 11' x 33' 377 S.F. G Existing house beyond 75' 22.5' x 36.2' 815 S.F. H S.F. I Asphalt Driveway all within 75' abstract shape 501 S.F. • JS.F. K Sidewalk all within 75' approx 7.8' x 5' 39 S.F. L S.F. M Flagstone patio abstract shape 226 S.F. N S.F. O Air conditioning pad 2 x 2 4 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 2,419 S.F. 1 Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2)from line (1)] 2,419 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Not including Crystal Bay Road 4,593 S.F. • Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 52.7 % Hemenway Remodeling 3355 Crystal Bay Road , Orono, MN July27, 2021 12 4111111, , • R@ i a 4 II I .,it..; ' t i t* : t".."‘"'474' 't 1-""" ‘ w 4 OP R it "41111111 a•I. LJJ • I t t 00 t Illiii, e .- .1111: -... - . • s° lig 4111111"* 6 111 t' i . Ilk 41115 Mr a ' ..t .' 4,T * '''' • fir. 4,. ,, ..,... 44 A, b 1111111i ..„ + y `, • • lilt r 40 'a iislor, 1 a4 �i. 1. Q� a, a • y• 4. ,. M'• err$ . a . 0 s ,.fi A .! a w', .• +-_ ,,� _'mak ..,1 -1� r '� ii 11:04.4%, '" - --'•„ ''''.7."- .., a 4.'4,', --..."",,',-, - . . • 1 • ..., 110'7,- 1 -k-..-.W -ari ;1111111 -.,.. 0,,,,, ..,0,„t• - A . - An 46,01r,,,, ' • e,oei, 4•„:„.„.,,,,,,,,,,,,,•;.,-,- , . r. ....0. * 1...., . 1111 • ' * . ,.„ . . .". ' '4 ', ,,,A - • :, .„-,- • . 0 . ill . •,,,-, ', .' .. :` . . '. ...„ „. ,.., * N, ...„. . C ' . , . ,. .. ,, ,.7. . ,.- . ...r 44. , , . , , t , ... , , r ' . . 1.. . . _ ...... A r ' r. - "4" ' O.' '-•— ' . ..„, •- ..,, . - • , , • , 1„ • • - 4 , 1 ihr „... ..... . . . , . . . . 'I ' '••0 7 4 itlitirew`di . f". '• „, -, . '` IA' , 11* .\ ....lir '... • ' *" . - .. . . 1111.10ipl' ' 4 ;' Ar ., - .. • , 4 . Iry ' „I . ,. ... . . .• •,.. . ,i,„.-''''.g T i'' fl g• .' g il g g .. ,. - .., , . ,...,,. .. ,• 1 f . . -.. . A ri ... ., ... ,,,,:ir • .-, 0:to-- . .: _. . ,, • : -. t. . .. .. -- - - -P,-‘' - ... F .. CI r..",` tot i IN '1 • - ` NPF '-. ` . t , : ' Pt L . .r I a,,..al. . . . - • - -- NO r .. ,, ... , .„... , NI • i . I It' a A., ,. . --' - . ... ... .. .... . .. , . a . ., " :, T." . • . .. . , - tie . . .....,,e ", .a. "'�` .. 1 ' �� k . 11,-0. , , i) 14`.Ly,.R. }A PJB kh -- r�;•,. : :. � • s° II 1f l6- 4 f k i1 - •M,I 1111. i' \ -. } 5 F*' ' , i .,' ... v4,. IIII ' Ig''''t lit «Isf # i 4,.., 111$. 1:kc' t''' - .1 - M . it \ .. ....p. a 'tar ,, iu . 4' . �, 4 .�y ir r0 .,a 4 c 4 6,�' ...• 4 `-' ►'" • ..rte* tt „',$"�' .a 414 � '=,, 4,_ ',,WS t +' 4 I ¢, o ,,, F f ior r' r d4::,11`,.{ Pit"'"' g, 71a y + p 2 :. �4.. L x$ffi -� s T . . 9 a3 p . � � f.t°" IMr p,A-(��`. . . ..' 4 p:.. k 7 1 � }r'' a a t« a• , �� 1• n , p 41 4 i. IA , .. i . . , Iiiiiki * ,,, - Io¢ ma I L r 4 y . ',..34/(,...), 0; `« . '4•.>.+� ,! • -,,-,, •,: $ moi .- ., '--..„-SI-' . ;`,o' I: -10;,'1. ,..,,:,';'. 1): 11/4...', A 1...,..'. . . , _ it r'''''1 - ' , 104.? ''. '4-..'-.--.4-!#:!,4 #A- •,.-a* .. . .-: ' , , , 45 ," , 4i �, r. 3. i III i i ..1t, i 4,... ...,---, .,-,„„1,,,,, ,,, :....,.. t.) r ..4 LIP7.1(t f y ... g p *� Y 5" A :z p t • 4011 ,,i;I : • } 44 0, ,i V ' 1164 ' il _ h. A p • « to p... > P i or AL ' " y .1:..J I , IA fropetill'i . ` « , 4i.'• . ...-. ),-.°,.'"‘„4, ' . ., 4,•,. '‘'..-:.k:.,,.. ,,1,141%*- ,1',, -:; ....,,.,.. ...-.-it . .,.. ... _ ....... ,,,,, • - Nrs:::,,,, zi-• ,,,, , . . .t. ,1-4. . - • . „ ... • .4,,,,-... -%. . • V'. ',.- f'").', '-,.,41-', ,,,ti-:.:4:,„; • . , , ,. . - •••••'''. , 41ii,;.-4-f.:it' :!, ,. ,,,, .,.ec .#,!..;:z....,,;-;:i''' •• - • 44;• 4*.'' ..14. ."'....,.......• .....40,„...."....,.11.,11. ....C.:' ••.'' .140°.l.' ‘N."'.:.... ..y Atl.. ' ' . . ; . ,L 's'....',..Y:S•:. .. .,'''.‘:''.•t,W''.....f•'.‘ . ,'t ' ...;Pt. ' ''..'.• .' • ; ' *::, .i' ." t 00 i. 1,..... ' '1.,;it.,..1%;;4'''':'....,. '.140::•-,• '",`.....‘-;-* .....,;,, . .. ., ,. '''.',;4-,!. ,,,,, ,,.••...1,;;,-,.4'...,. ..* . t 7:_ ..,,----• , . ... .• 7.*:-1•!:..:;.q ''rf ;-1,' '',1-','"'' ‘,-•'-',T.'',;-Za&''‘ 44:-1';.. '1V; ''' - - , •-. ., . . , .,•-• • 4,, '-,t, 4,4,•,. -., . - : 1r • ..' ,---- - ''''''-,. ''. -,.." . • „' .• - :. 4,,'r,„.;, ..-%. .'.., , ' . .r...----rp- - - -#.,... •.. " • .E.;,•..- - • ., -• ..• ,.., .;:.";.':' ‘,., .' . ..'. • I''. •:1;1.,,,•'..,:-':.::,4. ,'' ,....,. ' ' •-•-:..:,-., .,. .. ....,'it.;‘,. 4,'S• Y' ::4.. • ' • .'/' . .. ,, . •'.'.. •, . - •if: . . . -... ':. ,-:'.3, i: ,. • e. '-I. •..:• 7#'si...-..iik.:, ' ,•.:‘ ' '... _:-", ,.-.,...1 '.v, • s; ' ": - • 0 . „:,,,.... . -:-;.• -•••:•4"..... ,: , .-.-....._....------....-.....--...___ _.___—_,,,,_.._._-. ..z.-.-...a-•---...., (1.- ...r . .., .1. •,, , • ttR*::1::;': '''-el-• 1.!':..4.•1,,.; . , . . ..' ti... - ,....t,.._ ...-'••••••-•-••••---.-.-.--•----....--.'-,----..._, A v4if-: -04.P 1 I 1111,101Y- .mi , -.... - '1;,...,- a .., .11 . • 1/1 I i t‘ltr I t,1,I A: .. • ‘ . . .... :.,...ttl..„4.„...,...„..,,.. .t. ..,1, .. .. ., ..... .. . . ., 4,..... . „ir- 1 ill ..,. . , -.•••• ,..,.... ..... ..„ . -- . . , • -,- • j . . . ,, •, . .. ,,. . •• . ., • .„...........„.. ,. -..,..4 ir • . , . , ...„.„, , • ' . - p . . . , . . . ',• , • , • . . . . , „ . _- • '. . ' . _, . - . I . V . . . . Pi‘.4:H 1 ' ' ' .,' , ''-': ' .. '''' •'VS' '.,.;''', ' '''''; N t2:'''.;144e:: --..':11 •ViO'.. ' '''' • '„. - .. ' . - •- , ..."'„•,,,..13%,-4.4. . -,,,;,-,,,,'?`:'„.,.,'1.!''''•.''-.':'-.4.' "4_, ..,„k..., ....,, , ii;,ir . ,. •,,... 1 • ••• - ;‘... .,-- - -.•- ., - : ,t...,,, . . .- ..,..., • . • ,. .,,,..:„. .,... .•, -.. 7:1'-r.- ;- , OS', " ,' ;:•'''',--V ''' ' .";, ' ,f. ,,....-';'%. -417.-i .- :*"' . . , ' .'' . - • • •.•' • ,".''-'-•...-...7:.1.4 :v;\.'";'•• '' it , •';,,i,- ,„ ...,.. , ,'`'•,•4.. 's•k-f. *...q,,,„.......# ‘1•1 ,•,• ,o;4-'`;:r '„, ' .' '' '.. ‘,• . -."': w*- ';'`..‘ "-'I!41-' • ...II,- 4 .°,:i ' t'elle . ' . '... 'I.• t" '14,61i;ititt.:1',4-' 'c -, .. .. `.- t- „, ---.4.' ,,,, ,....- -?•.,... 1 4'7 'st: i, --. , i • - ',.',.:'',.:K.,,.., „:.f;-'' i,,,,,,.47,4.!4.4.,4- '''.. ; ,i7::. ''''' r.,*..\k"..„. .,...'.'c*.t.`:' ' '',NA .- • .,...- .. ..- .."..: ‘-•. ..' , *". $1-41.1 ..-.`..'.:'' '..f -----, . -. .- fl, ,-, • . +t , ,.,4i,-. -'-'..-A.., -:-. , , f,„...i.,..;,,,a,k,h4 r .. . .;.‘,31-1t... '..,,,.-,,;,,A,,,, ...„... ... -..e.?&... . , ,..,- 4'''' . 14 •'11:;;„'„1,',i/''..-7 ic."..10*-1q77''', . '''''' 4''..4i, 414'1' ; ' * ' '1 7', ''•'''te r ', ..tA?4,.....r',....,-:-4,i . 2,‘, - '''..,-/,',,,i ‘`..til , *...---. .. • s., ,-, ,,, or_s...-,,,.-: ,. ., ••••• lo- . 01ii-zr, ;*.dt;,4, • . ......— .4,, 4 '. n';'' ." —4iittrik'447,-''',-',4 ,_ 1;-,;9'''%?..-?.‘, -4 • ,, 40,..ti..4 ... 11‘°..k.#%4,,l'ii:4;-; :''• ....it,,,,, ,. 4s„,-,-, A 4., 't n•-,'- •,• - .` -7`4•,,. ,t,* 4,''' .. • , ..vtik. . - . ,. ' ' . ‘s'a .-'44 '• f `'....*-.A ' " , .- •,i. , -' , \'' '..„. ..•-•••-: F..fu.'.;='.:.,,„ _1,'..A '-:',';14-4../.* . 7". • ..._ 471,,..f.•.4- '4'''''''.',_•'±',47,14 ..4 '1,c't _,' 4'. .44-- .. _ . - ii•Ri.:.4' :4:- 41,;...4•42,',':-.,,, .., l'-''• ' $ , , ' I ,,,- '..7,'ir. •;',t...'..w ,..,..•.' A—..—...--‘1.tli.,:,t '.(f.. -,,,-. '-.••••" ''— .'4-•., 14‘'''')',.el ,t'V:,r-,-';.-.':, '!'. • :\,'''' . '''''' . '% .....1%.."‘ *** -.,;* ..,,.4.".::, •4,,,, •-',,.. - '-44 '' .4.• .... ',......• ...44 t.••,:c.' ,4.4.14*--. IP.11.1.11,?-'' ';- ' - . 1 ..illre if..• ....Nii -.: - 4.•I .. ' 1 ."., f.! . - -4„...-L4.,04141444-' ..e..•4/- .c:,:s..V,:f . . ,,, .16.it '' •Ni '•)'''l -.- h,::•‘. t - 1.16;c:'1.-,isi , •-id i , , .1 — . .• . , vw. ,-,::,- , 4 ' ' ,,' ''' '' '• .e' '7 ,,,.'.,-- `'''''''*4111100' , . ,... ' A. . , A.. + . .... „t t # - lilt ',Joilt .. ,.....,-. , .,......,,,A. ,zsi .r. . . -7 . ' . - -' - •,---4's--;- ,„>:X l'.*.....-,- .' " . . 44 V AC \ —el ,,,. • '''' ' • „,,dr_.- •• .1. , , '- ,,,,..-------.7.---....--7--:---- , - . -. rf'." -: •, , 4.' ' ,., ''i :,,' ....- • , ' ..-----/-- ' •' '':. 1 4 --- •• . • ... • ' •' ' ft.,,,,4,,•41, , / "•••• 'e. a. *,Nr,., , .. • -.•, , .„,... . 0•••„. ik.a. . , ..-. ,• , , ,t - • 4 I,„ -?**.„ :' .'.. • •••. ' .)4.• •• •••( . ' t.. ' •. C 114.sr . '--3-, ,- -. .,:e4...„:".='s.,, 41•4..••• , . . , - • f • '''• , ‘c• .- ‘': ...'''.4-'-' '''.., V.- .. ,......•",. - .!.;•Ty• '1 ••.;.- 1f11 ' -... ..." . . ,,, , ,... 0., 0.4,, t ,, l'f. :.• -0•44,.‘ ..4f•4. ••- './..- . ,..".•,f°,A.,.... 7..' .... -A i 4‘ .4 • \A, 3: . . -,-- - -, • :.„ ,-,5,,,t•,‘,-, g-,i* s . ',"•,, ' , ii- .- •,....,. -., -•Nttt .. 4.4V-441,....,-i' s •, . • ......°9 ,-,...... -......„.„ • ... . ^ • ...---•••• •'....Z ''. '''. ' '. J. - I. . r • ,i i .1.k.,-°0'.•'- '''' ''' '',__._.E'.7--,1•;-:'1.:t-__:T.; - -. rre. 1 1 111101' -• 1 I i . ' •j.. ---..... " --- __..., .f.'„, '.'i •*. ''.- ----0,04 ,„„ ---,_ • __ 'NI% --='.--,--------."--- --,•,--,.., j _ • -- 1 .t.- . 711' Jif . . . „ J..- • v.c2"- .f ....... ,. f .• •1 • * •:.. •: ill r - ' ., . -•-/ 4," A..c,i,,,, ; 1 c IIIi.-. itilillir 1 ..,..„..,„..,....... , .........4.,......„...... \,... ii,,,, _ • . gilL":"" ..• ' 57 1111101.11WORPO ,,,.. ---- rvonel A 4011 • •,•: - . • .• -. . um . ,. .- , r.s.ffAiks .......m.--. • . • .; ' i .. ,si e-- - . _ _ • .,,%,410,iik• - „t,, „,„'„:1i‘, ,.:4--,_,„„0: .--!. ..'., '' - „ . ,.,„ ,„_ ..„ ..-4,„k., . • . --. ,,, 4,„-6-•' - ,,,,Itt,:-4 * .--• nr- .. ,..._e`i .'.7. -$ ;, . • i , .•(.•-•'- tat. ir, •.,, • ' •-=`.;t-• ' tAP-142 '"1.'{' ')'''','„ iiifsktli**--.7P' .4".' . ":7" ' '4 •...1,A.„,-'''i.,'''4-?"',•• t'., ' . ' • ' ' 1 '''''4' •v` ''''''rlic4'4,'""''''';',ieittioi•it t5'''' -•-' --: 1'--"-' -tV-4 =- 7 • . ..'?el'„. - ,' = - • ".0 „, 1,`'‘,„1.„,„',Ali:.10 •Al.'4,19t.'z .--":41.'4,,,,.. '.,r, ,‘ ',.•AA' S .. ,, ' . .. _.,. ,,,, ,,_, ,, ra .... t,„,,..,-.,,,4,,„,40,4.,,J,,, ,,,,,..„_., , 4,..„....,,,A,—, ,4,,.„, )0,,„,„.. pc.„,t;-• , • -""--' ,/ , •;4`,,,iffi;:,214:44,,,, - 4.- .i;-k-1;‘,.."..",..- . :0:1444)444t.,/'W ';- ''.••4.., t4s0 '••• -4- • 0 4..X % . • -' 1 .. 1..t.,,,'4,,s' ry,•;4"„„,,.. 4""•'.•'•>4.'4•, It'. t•"'' 'L` •4 •'''' .-11. ,.,•4,4‘,..!.* .44:1 -fY.••.' ,,.'' _,,,.....- 40-",... .-...-":„,,'. ;,,.4,$kk:ii, . , lt,,,iO4,L 4'1,,:isrm•••',ii: ',.;,,,,•„'S..-i..!tv't•-,:••• ,•;‘,0.41- „,-.,-,..isk, ' ,',.;', '.1 •-•-c..z--/,F,,,,„:.,: ,4.w,;.•---- 7:''1'. '' • i/' '''. ' - - •::.. ' •/.-..,r4.--.44:.•• ".s:NC .„? ,,..11&-W, , •-N,:‘,::, -';,:-;,,-.„ t. , s• ',7-- ''-, ,0:,', , .• . ,', .,.‘• ' --.0„. ...e, ..., m•. ,..7.—• ,,,..., ,! , , tr#4,740,4,"i„,t,' •,,t,, - 7,.Tti 74.*","_ , .V- --,6,1"., ' 1-, r''' :__,,,, , ,•4's- i,t,''at: - ' - "• ----- w-C--, „‘,.. k., , Pt4.2:"tt` ;t: :,'• 4”' ,V-- 4:- •: ' :,' ,t-s ' , ,.... e , * - - -, -4-'' -•41,e,,,,st isi , .. s .--.; 414.4*"-'Tt,h.! : , \.;1',,444,, '404,4 1, '""1 '; -4., - 4? 11 .., ' :",-,„.,_ ,_ ' . ,'."4.-- • . %,.,,,t_ I.„-..‘4,44, ,-"- '-' '-'.. ' ' , \'' ,, '.,,- .,w•-' - 4,44,,,,,M.'Sci../--:.:-.'''N.'' '; ' .•1';'''.! •"...4, '•• AIR • - .4.--••••• • 1..4.-—-.,' V' •• .., 40."4r.....4.,...1.$4..„ . . Y',.. „;14..,`" -.1.,..1.."ivirc ''' ... A..4,,,N.• `i .r , ,.. .. , z., 4 AA,. - . ',- • :'-'4.-- ' -7-4" !..,.-:......4.„; •,---. -..--...4t•'- •-• . •.' 7. ,..,-:. . • `•,.--;. • ;•-s ,,,,"'!ho,,,.4, ,,,, • °Iv, .• .r° , -r 1 •••• '- 0' - -•••‘ lib' - - -''•• ft.4.Aaqa. .4*,-:••-•' .... ...”i .3., - e• - *1',. . t„„'*-•T s•41,4;57.444is.+,- . ,,..-e«,4-- f- -,-,* '... •' • s';•--:. ' '' • ..- - . _ i,,,,,,'r.:-111F:+04,441tr_ ..,.'-.. 7* : • ''...„ft.,44,16.;., L „.k'..4-',-" ,;-",:z144..,e't ,- -4 - , ti,4,--',' ' - " 1. _"' , • .'Jere... jr , ... -__ _ .. ,r.:------ . . ,..:-.. -- . Am.. .0.... -.Ty fr, f. 4•Lo rtIci'NA.t k ....,.i,„ .' • ' - . 4-.5:•-•": '••:, . ,,,,•• ^- ' ,. •• ,-- '•....'".'41'1-•,•• •••1 .. ''' ‘.-S.: - • ••••-;•.- •••••k • -, °'Ift-# . . 'r'•' . .7! Not. l're.°'r:• . r . trikst\- 'It - ' . ..; , ' - „p";"'',.;..'""i ."...! ' ... . t ," ,• -• . ' '''_ 't-4;4 7,. , t* ;4 4'. ' / gr'it 1. / / 1- -0 •7 . " ! . ••.17°'''....L'''•..„:„Z? , ., , , i , ,-- , , . '.• ;41.,, - A .-- r t , _. 4 t .',..,'„ 7,..:-..,. . „7.4.4..4_. , '" ,4' ..'.' ' 4.. i, /. ,1. e:' - ., -- -. `-' ' -e4 i• • - . - .'".--"Pf.' ;•';';-6 " ;'' - „,.,sc'''•:',;-f _di, 4 0—tor .. - _ .,.1...,,- / "-11,,,,..., 7-,4; _ . , - ' • -..; 44,---,-,--..,,;)'/4 4,e-i-- .., - • . -,.;,.-.:.:7-;' -...,..--,:i ''''.." '. r 4..04. AO, : , 40; . "*IiiriP ' ..:. -' SI,e, - - , .„../' -"' • ' '-•1 - ' ‘'` 'It' ...'""•41M.r. T.Y1",..4"44'r+'•' ... • • ' _ .....4''....' til* i ;441' ' i .' '.f" 1°X...°•°11tri ••L.:1k 4, •AO°4.4,4f* di ./ f •/NaV 141111L jle--,‘..... t _v la.,04 • *.A>*..'/.• ' ;" F-. . ,, • • , p. .,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,),,,,' ,..-.sti-,`.:q",-,-,,,.'7 --,, N C ,•....''•--="--:- f•.,,...,;, ' ''-• * , :,••'.. 4 4sc..,'''' ..x!','' '..,.1"•i'.ey.-(kti N:.•' 4 . . ''' 4 ; .4''''.1‘Ii.:•..Y•!..:. ..',,t; i :.'",r01,, 's. •71p.• ----slog .. 1 . - ••• •‘ .--.34K-', . ,•z, , •-.4 .„4, t. . , t,..„ ,, i ; ." 1 ' t ,li • .,) t. .-- .. II i ' •::., ' ' ' ',1-...._•.••-:-, •"it," ..ti. 1 ' at L , ...-- , ,i, ,e,te., N'411. 4c't`,...‘'''.• 1 . 0 , ? -4 II' ---/\ • 1• • - '.,:,--tikt.„-it:,.. • •....'sv,t*,:))4 1 7.-'., ....a..• ", 4'''4''• ', ' _ . .°.°Y-N, , V (r ' ‘,4kt'-'1,*. 1, •t„: • .,,, ,,,, , '', • , ,-,..' 4.'''' -,AIIIK cm MI ',..._,• ' •. • -4I 11111111111111 A • . . ,,.' •4.... • 114.1111ii• 2 . -.: • ,..\ . •••,:-.,\.' 4 ,; , . I . ,• i.• .•., ' ",----,:* , • --- , • • ---!: ",, in . . • .. :2.',,,- •'-'7,' 'k 4''•'• - -I \ ( \ I (_. . .., ... ..,y.., -..- \ i ,,j -, •4"•,,,!,kik,, ,... s. A 1..1_, I . , • . „..., 1 \ k • ."NS , i71 , ....... _ t Ai,„,...,. • ..... 4.4:3,..,....;,...- . I.,. ...-..,, ,,, ..... at ....,....-......„.,-,-.-0, : , ‘., ,•t i -., . mil . . •:: _., .. . . , • • ..• .• ... .,. .. . .. . . ... ,. • • • •, , . . . . . . . . . ,. ,. . . .,...: . . . . . . . „ . . . . . • ...., . , . • .., . . ..,;, .. .„., ,. ... . . • . ., . . . . • , • .. •••..... .._. • . • . ..„ . . .. . . . .• .4,..41, ,.4 \ . . . - ,. •- • •. .-• ,•,.:.-.•.,..., ...•... . -. . , •. ' . ' ' ..-- ' '' ' • ' ..,. ..,' 4::.,s,:;_.ft s ' •!,.iiit: • ' .r--; .„, • =. • I . ,, ,,„ :-, •,.• •.. . .. , , , -• - . ...,• , .. . . „ , -, .. . . , .. , ... .. . , . .. ... ., . . . . . ,, . • . ... , ., _ .. • .- . .. I I1 •- • ' 1, ' / ' ,..?:•%,'•' I '.," •' .•,. . , ... , ,. ,, . ,,,,,••.•. ,,,,,,,,_. ,_• .•- ` ... . . . . . .... A •• 1 -I • • • ' ai ' [i-•'*.'.','" . . -- • ....,...,... ,.., . ••.• .... . ' . 1 ' , ' .:•••!..',,,,".•••'-,";•r•:',.,,i.:!••1•-• 1,TI,4,5 s.4,4 t- .....,..„„t. 1\•4`, / • •1 . .... .., . ..••., --,.- •,,,r. 4.;•••..t.nt.:1 '•^, z:',i.....1,16c.i%'-`7i•-1...••.- ,I,S;'' 1* .:'' •1.• 4.;' s .,-;est..:*:.ofz•o.:„.-...,--.‘A--,•,,,,,:s.--r...?••••• •••,:..):i-y,..-.,...,,---•-• -,-,:..,..,,..,-,;,... • 1,—, : l';''-';',''.'..''''..'..\'-‘:‘,...-','''''7.,,-A%-- .7:-7F.1.:',.;':::''.'.':....:i: A . • IL 06 .. ' ' •,f t t, , I .'.'''' ..',7If.....VI.A.ti:,':,..7'0'.-..''.„' .r;L!..,...C:.... : ..;,. ''r'4.' . ct-. . . • .,.. , . , 1' 17... ".4 1. , 1. . , :. 1,' '‘..4 , • ''. . i. .,,... . . - ' . f .4 .. . „ . . ; i:izir,•••,,:.. .- .,,,,,,f,...:0,,,..-,--,-,-;•,,,,-:-•,...4.-,••1.-..-.,;.! ar&FT."-- - ''ti,k',.•"' '`t..4.1,i'l,'_,..--•-•• -;,..-•.,-,,-,...• --, ---,= — !•17,*,,,;,,.,,,,t, -- -..;.,:,.. -.•..;',-.----::----,-•,:••'1,;',k,-74. .,•-c...:,,,.---,7,-....,••,--,-,.. -,- •-.- - ---,-•:3,173,•;1....,-,1f. "- •-:-..-;..;.;,,,..,..t :T..t.::•:-.7•;•.:,:-..?..,...,•;•;:::,:-.-,,!..,..........:.•••‘-.-..---.•,,!.:--•:.-; '47.?,‘,,,,,,,,4c, . :. ,,':"';;:,-,..'-',..4',,''''''-7.:','.;'•..:.7:-.,-,••%,..'''::: '''':..•-,1*.':,,"' '.."'I.V.:,••••:' .•-:''.,:.-2.: ., ,--...............- ' ,t-Vjt7t;.,' ...; •'.,',..--:.!:: ',-.::1;.,•,'.'.--::.:•.':,--...-..‘'....:-.:.'i:-.,..•::!...:'..,--`,2?.:4-:...'-:`..'..;:.,:,,i,T.'.... -..\.•• , ,, ,e..-:. , . ..._ •,;.',J.,:,4;:i:,,:::,...1',.., ..;.. ..'.,•,,:-.-:•.::e....-3c,'-:.i.',...;;.::'.: -...,-.:-.:',...,...:,::,-.--;-... ',.,-4'.•••-,.:,:',4..is,f, ................___ - ....., ...—:-' I M.- ------ .,-;ii!'‘..:...,i1::i::''-f.:4,,' '‘'. ' ' . ,- .... •-,' ..:,!,-;'-,..::-.;''''''''''''''.-'''''i , .-..X-,','..2.',,,,.-7.iici! `4tti,: '-',..' _:,,--„,,!-',-,!.-•;•,,-:::-''',‘;'!-.7:','-:----;;;;,f '''-- 1.-..,-,/,7%-:•'',--.,--4%4 r,..'' — - -- -: ..-...... , g : r„_r • :=:.,:t. r. •,.f:-A:i.„......,,,.,..,...,;_;.,...,. .,... • .. .:;., ..' • • . , I L, , : . , . : r; ,..4 11 .., i., ' . ,'..A.,'.. -'.;,..,,-?...;.,N •i",,•';.=41 . , ,,,,,-.1..-zi:•-„,E,:v„.-.••. ;•''' , ; '• ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .1,.--; ,J. p. ' .: :-e-s,'.7••••!,-ti.'s1,,k' ',..); ;. , . . :-.1.,;',:--,,,':,•••zk: .N. ..':„': , \ - "' ' : / / • : •,.,../.;,'" ' - , / -,44,-,; 11 , ,,,,,,A. •-- X;.k.,•-, ,,ot.% IIIN - -31.,:-..4-1,' *- ...4-..-." -•2 It i I ,..i.. 4: 4!‘.:,,1-..71' 1 ., -„..i',:, • - ! . i - .......-.-t.,'.,.;..-:.,.-.•,:;.•'.4=c,,,,.,.:,k:;,.rt,,•...•,..,-Aet-r„4s-•.'-.z''.°..-,...:,„,',''-A'.'.,,„',. ,..-, 1k- .. .. . . 41,. :•:•:.,.•,•.••i. ,•, •,, . i '. , . ."4-41.g';'•' 't , . • ' ' ''''•••t‘',0,y,'1.-41 OEM, t. • I., 4'4-- f ',I' ,, '',.' :'''` ''',',J 1' '4, ' '-No k h; ' • '-' 4...7,7;1.it--‘*-7-',:,7.4k.i.;ota....'5%,1 ., k..-:--, .,, ,.'''.--'74. ..,.'-xi,l's.'• x ' ' .• 111/1// 1 . i. ,.. ,. + ,,,-, .-7-, ..4.170•17-.4•!... . .-!-, - 't .!-'',,,Fft7eA.4.•...VC. 2 ) yank 1 : :::.;''''' ../t.. . . _ • --.4,-.‘....:;. ';,',”. •••• , ,, • t, %. ::::;•.!1-'144i:'`-3-'''' •,-,-_. . ••,( -- , ' ‘V. . . . ' lattlitagitikaNit ,; • „. . ti 1 V t, — .. \ .r ' ''45';.7 'rA7-0%%le. el' .,%„'`.;:.--'ti$. ..444 l'i.. 'LA. ''. ' '" I.:::, AI i. . : . -o,''. ''''''.1,..,,::-„,; , ,•. M, a.y- i .. • .<..,, . . ., . , 1 `.• 4 • fl �4 1 ---,...\\.4":„` '•'�Ff tp 1 L.•K� t+, `ri ��'4' j� +.~al t �,� I �� 1±..t.., 1 :::,•_,... , .,••( . . • •, ,,, ,„ A \I imi , . .,, ,,,.. .,0•0,,,,.;k X::,.•„,.. ' • W �� • l' ,„,,,,...K ' cr ,. ,i..;.. 4."� /".-Fq . •,..-.'•.1.,.. ' .- ,v, . , k e I ? A. M ( ti �� v F"—: A id i. • M I. r` • a 4 t� • \\\\ • • • • 2i ads rtra ,Oral ; q ili .. �•.. r ''`� it 'hlY� f % SF'4,�,�'�A, : �r if i 1 _ !I • �I J {a. :•••:-' 4*-'''',- ..up :. R.al_t �I h f 1��' 1 1 y y (. ` '. ��,rt' ? 1 „1 �1��lr7'I 117+1 -�i d_ _ ` � `£ 1 • 1 f MI„ 1 „ iii ii r..,!:••••..,,-,,,,,,::N r1 r,, .. Irl ! � ". ' .4,;:r..",-:if. 1 N. . .„..„- .., ,k ,or,,,4-..,. „.• -.,,, . •. .,:r,,•-•-:lr'--- ., r.' i .- , , ', - .'. '-"--•••••tx‘, ' ' i i• , � it 1L. £s, R , 5 "z4.1 4vtilil:'..:, ►�'1 I . .. . , '' II , 11 • :,. .. , . . , . ,.. . , • „ , . . y. , . •-. ' , • . . I . , ..„• ' . , ., - • I \II .. , 111.1 •• . . , . , . . • . . . • . s ,. , , ,i, , , .; ,• • /, , . - • • • ', '- `. , , .• . . ., ,. . . .. , . . . ., . . . . . . , •! • . f' i . , ,' • • -., -„ E , • . . . .. I • , . . .: • . . , . • ...-- .. 1. , it,• ',. ' ' i ,,. . . , - . . . ' --4. * ' - • •*: '-4 --,-.'4'.'"4 . • f .; . , #: ..: •.' ' . ' ., , .• • . . .:-. ,'..A.'.44•. •- •...;,..z. .i.,..',77.1. - 4 ,' •' . ., : - ., . •- • . . .-VH.. .-...7. ‘,..,:'-..,...:*.,,, I rt'-4:'.+.‘.::!'::. •• ,','.'.'i- 1, 'i.II ... .,,,..nh,:•.• • ..t. ,.... .• ;001/ . ..• .,. . .• , ..., ...,, • I • i • . .. • . .. .....- ' ' •• ..'7*''-' '''... -:,,'11.......4 44,1%.%.„'..:,'4,'. ' . ,, . , tcP..t.•' , , . . , I ' ' . - • ' ,-'.", I.:` , . . '.,,It • -...' 41.,;, - p?, ,....., ...„,„.. . . ,...c.. ...„„,,,.,...,.. ,.. . , • ,... „ ..;:..t.,,-.-•••• ......, ,, , ,. . • ., • . , . ..,4-1,...,...-.. --i.'.: --'r . . \- 11 4.;-. .,-:. - . ,. , .. .. _. . .. . . .1 : •:.--.•, 11 - ' 4' . : . . - . -• - "': .:.., • . . \71111K.. .-,..' .'.:. . •..:..:..,: 1. -,-,--,, t • -4. -: ,• ,,,-- .... ..,....._ .., ,,,,.....„... .. :. . :: .11,..- -..,,,.. • - • * cr,:s:'-;.. -••-:•:.-...•,--....-,.,:.• . ..:..,' -.::':-.."--.' ,..".:,,,;••,,,-...-,,..-.,.• ., -• , . . ' ;. : . .- .., -- , . - ..- ... :,...,,,,, . . . . -.. ,. __ NB 1.11111611,' ' ,,.....:-; .2,. 'I '-''-V'- e ,. , ',it.'.,,.•4.,:',,-4,,.'-c, ''.. , -- ' •,. _ •—.-•.,,1; .it* _ f_ki- 11-_,,:.., •:— -' ..- _ ';:7-7•''2.-'"-': ,-• ...--.7.7'k:!**--'-., .-..'')'''it • , . :. . . i"'i,,1.4'J'I''''.:''''4 ••• ' , •.-‘. IAtTS,V), '.:'.' •‘..:4L^:::••,-7.-ZSI'4 -'-•-•- -••• t' •''' Ali' 4;1•i, ' C.:V.P ll;'!•1,1','• • •• ' ' • -, •-•,, ' 4 0 - ' ,,,f....e. .4,•,..;,_--'...,,,,,. -..'2, ' --It.11.tv.,'..';'• ••....,? IL •,. ,— ‘.. r• ., . A.i 1 46 . , .1 . , . ' . : ti;0011444; ' ••,..-'4" .'ff.1 41 , -.—.. I I .— i - ii ...-:.%. ', -4-kf yi.,.;%.4?•.,-.•--1.--.wio,.*".•,-..- .• - %)\r. ,-- -,-, . . ••-• -ei.i:7`...;-4:t. ;-...-...ce..-- - 1 ._.•._ . 4 „,..,„,•.,,,,- ':', 114 .....A5.,-e., :;•10.•', ti,t ',.t.e..:,.. ,'.• ..t.. ol•_•.4. • - . . t.,ip.p,•-••••,:-: ..,,...,.:„. -, • .,; 4., . ..,•.• .4„.4„41,,,.. , .. ..i.,..t ...,.ti,..- .I. ( ? , •',,:'-'1N.- - .4- % '-',-t.,*,,,', , - .i.f '-- I.. t .-...:,..; ,')I. ,-I i'h- . ,• -, - -, .. . , • ,.• .... ;-. - ,,4, ..0ilp',.: , r- 4 i ,• '- !I.'.'II-', .,,,"!..i.... ,.,'41' 4 i r',, * ' '. '4'N1417'' . , .. . ' I g., *4., , ,.,.. :.;; :., .,-;!..ilt.-.'',..Y ' • • .1" * -4' '1.-:' ' ' - ,"' ' GA'?.\ i ' *, , . I , • 1 ''.k lii'4-''/'..•\ ••.... ,., ' iS4 1 , . :. ', • I '' ' I .'.7.r'_!1!..,.,.:::-.K.,f,-,q,• ,.t ',,. - ,s' . ,,, i . ,.• •• 1Vit.. ':.'..".1.-; ;.4.. I ,, — ' — '°. ..' ) , - A. --11 k .. 44• ,,,'.- •-!*, ..t. , - 1 -1 1 .I ' s'.•74'-',..X.--.!-•-.'. - itil,t .4!„t.'- 1%,' ?, ; , ft ... , t 0 . *.•• .- '• 'If'''''-. '0P, .'54.t',,,,,'...-:'..-i.'"..!..: s: , .. , . 1, , . .. ,. ... ''' " -.4k4,4:! ei-''4 •.'-''.., -,. ,', ,,..k* 1 ,..,.-- - Ate-,,,:!-'::--is ,-;',,,.',1s;u,.:T"': .•L-A-ii. :f ' • V" ' - — t t i . . ',",,'tir-7,e,r';:,, l'.1:-;,.„..-14 .•'-,..:4;,:lk.,,i;.:: -. ' (- ''--11f.,- ' ''„' 4V . . - r- f•1:".....i4,', ., .• " -L. .:---_L,„7„'.:.„.:-.,....• .' *',. - - • . . _:%1 .•..,' • . [(.,', '..•......4 '-,._...i..'':.,:,..,.'•.;)dAk:,•ilfl.•,i,,z..-...:X.t,„-..ir!-,:4*!z-1:c„...4L....S1f•,ps-LIj4-TgJ."1.k,`I.,.A,w..-.-.t-14l,7i,7.;k-.:,..',.14,.4..F-.....1•..0.,•A.,i:,-••..,:,•„,..''..tf.:'s!,;, . ; , , .,..0.Z,,....,..i.t.,.,,. ,. • '. . . ' ,,:' 441 ' ; .„'4',. '.., , ''S. • I.. : -__,..;,Ir. .1,A,•,,tpl .- -7,--4.i.:4:,1' it; L#Wit . • . . ,• ,,,,,4.-A••,.., ,•4,—•-?......461:7; 't- /Qtt • , ,. 4-,,.•1,16+,11itiwr.k • •• ,,_,-,-i‘, , ,.,..„•-:....,f;•,7,,v,...i.,y.. ., . . '. ,'-;• ,:,• :::-''.',',',,Y.,,!::.•...1‘,.,•-iiiiii. ,,,', •-..- 4.,' •,,, ,,y 71"2.... / , . • '4 -, -.'''':: .'.-.'•' -..' ' . -7:i.' / ,,,, '''''' --'"--- — WIRIONRINE* .,,' ,.''- •1' ..-Y.',. ':. '.-..- .,,:''',', •--4 / ,- ;;* ' ,,'IM. , \. . ,. :•,,...114,; .. „.,,e,,,4, _ „.... t„.1..., ... ' .• , .-;!:,. -..., --,---,, ,. „.4...u„ N. , . :f 1::rft.;,..,-'."k. . 1 - ' - -84 ..!-..' - \ ..,, „_....... j#,„,..- ' •• ' .' ,:- ... ..',.. ...IA't. -.4: ., . .: ... -•• - . :-,.... ••.4 .,-,,4 ,,i4,4: ' , 1 t-- ' , ::, Exhibit G Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map . Date: 7/21/2021 r t i 3294 416, • .125 ("216a ns: .,-, 1 131] 2712175 'x. 1J ,35C 33'' p - �i 11, • „ 6:4 91 77 3355 '3353 ,a 1 ' �4 2215 Z. oot 3375 t�y+�,•'' t 3405 3240 m 32A5rwi ,5 •2 1111 mo, =* 3290 200 1' 223:'.' • pn AO s 3280 2250 . . tort lQ5 04.7., 226?} �/ 2195Ik111112215 ; to nt 23aa 33aa,M, :':308 : ` 1251 2314 23aa x 22"t_ fel as, r265 .275 0//d, , , 2328 rao ' _�z �� 2318 4g1 7330 3t' •s e"i4 r,, 2344 13t;`_ alo ',:t'4 235,3 in' \tN 3320A1C* 331.E 0' %fs.'� Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 3355 Crystal Bay Rd This data () a furnshed 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; 0i)is fum'shed with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable fa any damage,injury or loss resulting from the data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepn.us RUN DATE:07/21/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 17-117-23 34 0052 38 17-117-23 41 0034 38 17-117-23 44 0021 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH PAUL J&LOIS E REHMAN ROLAND M BRENNY . 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3399 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PAUL J&LOIS E REHMAN ROLAND M BRENNY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3399 CRYSTAL BAY RD 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 17-117-23 41 0016 38 17-117-23 41 0035 38 17-117-23 44 0022 DAVID A SCHMID C G OWEN&J L HUGHES CATHERINE L SWEET 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2175 KENWOOD WAY 3405 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID A SCHMID CLIFFORD G OWEN CATHERINE L SWEET 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD JILL L HUGHES 3405 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2175 KENWOOD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0017 38 17-117-23 43 0115 38 17-117-23 44 0023 DALE OLSEN&JONMARI OLSEN TOWN OF ORONO TOWN OF ORONO 3315 CRYSTAL BAY RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 DALE OLSEN&JONMARI OLSEN CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO 4680 CREEKWOOD TRAIL PO BOX 66 PO BOX 66 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 41 0018 38 17-117-23 43 0116 38 17-117-23 44 0025 TODD OLSON&ANGELA OLSON WILLIAM L WOLFSON JENNIFER A STACK 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3407 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2205 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 TODD OLSON WILLIAM L WOLFSON JENNIFER A STACK 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3399 CRYSTAL BAY RD 14875 TIMBERIIILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNETONKA MN 55345 38 17-117-23 41 0019 38 17-117-23 43 0117 38 17-117-23 44 0026 C M MCSHANE&R A MCSHANE TOWN OF ORONO }IPA BORROWER 2018-1 MS LLC 3329 CRYSTAL BAY RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2215 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 CHAD&REBECCA MCSHANE CITY OF ORONO HP MINNESOTA I LLC el 3329 CRYSTAL BAY RD PO BOX 66 120 S RIVERSIDE PLAZA WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 SUITE 2000 CHICAGO IL 60606 38 17-117-23 41 0021 38 17-117-23 44 0016 38 17-117-23 44 0027 J D&T J HOFER VIRGINIA E LOFRANO TRUST TERESA ANNE KOCH 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3365 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2225 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN&THERESA HOFER VIRGINIA E LOFRANO TERESA KOCH 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3365 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2225 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0022 38 17-117-23 44 0017 38 17-117-23 44 0028 SEAN R FOY/PERRESA K EGGERS JOSHUA JABS&NICOLE JABS MICHAEL P MCDONALD REV TRUST 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3369 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2245 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SEAN R FOY JOSHUA JABS&NICOLE JABS MICHAEL P MCDONALD 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3375 CRYSTAL BAY RD PAMELA J MCDONALD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 4695 LAGOON DR SHOREWOOD MN 55364 38 17-117-23 41 0023 38 17-117-23 44 0018 38 17-117-23 44 0029 JULIE B LENSING LYNN GORDON KELLY A&SHAUN S RIOUX 3349 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3375 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2253 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JULIE B LENSING LYNN GORDON KELLY ADELIA RIOUX 3349 CRYSTAL BAY RD 462 VIXEN RD SHAUN SCOTT RIOUX WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2253 BAYVIEW PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0024 38 17-117-23 44 0019 38 17-117-23 44 0030 JEFFREY DONALD HEMENWAY GREGORY A HELMER ALEXANDER MARK BALTES 3355 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3385 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2265 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JEFFREY DONALD HEMENWAY GREGORY A HELMER ALEXANDER MARK BALTES 3355 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3385 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2265 BAYVIEW PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0025 38 17-117-23 44 0020 38 17-117-23 44 0031 • R A LUZAICH&J N URAL P W MYERS JR&M E MYERS TR JAMES R ANDERSON 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3393 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2275 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RICHARD A LUZAICH PHILLIP WARD MYERS JR JAMES R ANDERSON JENNIFER N URAL MARY ELIZABETH MYERS 2275 BAYVIEW PLACE 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3393 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:07/21/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 17-117-23 44 0041 38 17-117-23 44 0109 • KRIS A&BRETT FERRELL G ASHDOWN&G M ASHDOWN 2250 BAYVIEW PL 3286 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KRIS ANN FERRELL GLEN ASHDOWN 2250 BAYVIEW PL GRACE MARIE ASHDOWN WAYZATA MN 55391 3286 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0042 38 17-117-23 44 0110 M BRASSINGTON/M BRASSINGTON ODELL TUTTLE&LARA TUTTLE 2240 BAYVIEW PL 3290 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHELLE M BRASSINGTON ODELL TUTTLE&LARA TUTTLE 2240 BAYVIEW PL 3290 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0057 MURRAY R MAURSTAD/VICKI AUNE 2215 KENWOOD WAY ORONO MN 55391 MURRAY R MAURSTAD VICKI AUNE 2215 KENWOOD WAY ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0082 SHANNON WOLCOTT 2200 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 SHANNON WOLCOTT 2200 BAYVIEW PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0083 J L SCHNECK&P M SCHNECK 2230 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 JL&PM SCHNECK 2230 BAYVIEW PL S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0096 B A WILSON&C A WILSON 2300 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 BLAIR&CAROL WILSON 2300 BAYVIEW PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0098 MICHAEL J SWANSON 3300 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL J SWANSON 3300 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0104 CLAIR T ROOD 3240 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 CLAIR T ROOD 3280 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0105 CLAIR T ROOD 3280 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 CLAIR T ROOD 3280 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 • 38 17-117-23 44 0108 C P BLOCK&C R BLOCK 2260 BAYVIEW PL ORONO MN 55391 CHRIS&COURTNEY BLOCK 2260 BAYVIEW PL WAYZATA MN 55391 • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • • Date Application Received: 07/21/2021 Date Application Considered as Complete:07/30/2021 -V _O.Ai 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/28/2021 $14.,.. To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members y Adam Edwards, City Administrator `°� � 4kESHOR‘`' From: Laura Oakden, LLO Date: August 16, 2021 Subject: LA21-000054, Sharratt Design & Co-Michael Sharrat, 2695 Shadywood Road, Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS) variance to permit the addition and deck improvements to the house to be lakeward of ALS. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed. Background The existing principle home on the property is nonconforming to the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is requesting to build a 3 season porch and deck addition along the east side of the home.The proposed roofline of the addition will be lower than the roofline of the existing • home maintain the same defined height of the home. The project is proposed to be lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. All other city codes are met with the project. Practical Difficulties Analysis Bo oR, i Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has ,'. / ("y,' Ni> identified lack of a building envelope for the current . ' o ,o° h' 6 22 SPRUCE property and the location of the neighboring home as ',` `, - practical difficulties supporting the requested q�S. y`' Fq 1� • variance. Additionally,they have provided supporting 'sem.- ',=*w <, ., esPRucE documentation regarding Practical Difficulties vD�'i`� •,...;,- 36,--, Average Lakeshore PRU6E g g 2. ,• R Exis-nto3 Setback attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for ---.-- -- . SE a ,\' .`, ,-''"r • ` e SPRUCE additional testimony regarding the application. <r P,nO` .5 _T`A' ,6',(F( �'tA UCE Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff � , s rv+es4MA?1.1'4!.f,`c agrees with the applicants arguments for practical s Ees ,--ewsaao � � difficulty due to the extreme setback on the 2 ' ,� n},,�. proposed Addition neighboring home which eliminates a viable building 75 Lake setback � ,;, ��. , envelope for the property. The property is unique > �'-_;j / ,p for the neighborhood due to the depth of the parcel .�'so, t `\ ' - , (roughly 170') compared to the neighboring lots -.....,'0:7,' Mt �, \,./, .w '` beingover 300' in depth. The deeper lots allow the ",..,..7-20 ,,1, . ,,ti , r - P p2y c>••` home to be built farther away from the lake creating �`�1--, an extreme average lakeshore setback for the subject --.„ ,<,`'s,1 - property. Staff supports the variance request. `t-,-<� , 15 MOE LAKE ACCES£ , i FOR LOT 1 PER DOC.N LA21-000054 August 16,2021 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET • Section 78-330—Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear 30' 40.9 No Change Side (West) 10' 90.2 No Change Side (East) 10' 50.7' 32.3' Lakeshore 75' 78.8' 77.9' Average Lakeshore Not Met Section 78-330—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140' Actual 38,963 s.f. (0.9 acres) 220'@ OHWL Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 38,963 s.f. (0.9 acres) Allowed: 7,792.6 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,268 s.f. 5.8 (%) Proposed: 2,524 s.f. (6.4%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: • Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 38,963 s.f. 9,470 s.f. 4,950 s.f. 5,440 s.f. (25%) (11.5%) (13.96%) Applicable Regulations: Section 78-1279 (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL)than the average distance from the shoreline of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots;This does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, and/or stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes,flagpoles and pump houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries.The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way,the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the principal building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. b. In situations where the average lake shore setback line bisects the principal building located on either adjacent lot,the next most adjacent lake side point of the bisected principal building shall be used for determining the average lakeshore setback. If the line continues to bisect the principal building,the next • LA21-000054 August 16,2021 Page 3 of 5 • most lakeside point is to be used until the setback line does not bisect the principal building on an adjacent lot. The average lakeshore setback line is roughly 120'-165'back from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. The entire existing home is located lakeward of the ALS,78.8 feet from OHWL. The proposed addition is connected to the existing home and is proposed to be 77.9'from OHWL creating a new encroachment. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary • use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of the average lake shore setback is to preserve neighboring properties'views of the lake. The proposed encroachment will not impact these views. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The proposed use of the lot for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as is the preservation of lake views and Shoreland management. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The placement of the addition is a reasonable location given the intent of the ordinance to preserve views, and manage sensitive environmental concerns. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing conditions of a uniquely shallow lot for the neighborhood,existing house location and the extreme average lakeshore setback due to the neighbor to the east are circumstances not created by the landowner and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The encroachment into the ALS will not impact the character of the locality Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. LA21-000054 August 16,2021 Page 4 of 5 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight • for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The extreme distance of the average lakeshore setback due to the neighbor to the east only apply to this property is unique to this property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The conditions do not apply to other land and structures in the district due to the unique lot for this neighborhood. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.The applicant states this to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed encroachment is not anticipated to impair any health or safety goals of the city. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Per the applicant,granting this proposal is not for convenience. Granting is necessary to allow a totally unbuildable site a reasonable use and very reasonable and minor improvement. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, the applicant has submitted letters of acknowledgment from 2705 Shadywood Dr (easterly neighbor) and 2693 Shadywood Dr(northern neighbor), attached as Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed. • LA21-000054 August 16,2021 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey,Annotations and Ariel Images Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Neighbor Comments Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map • Letter View Exhibit A Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/21/2021 Address: 2695 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55331 Parcel Number: 2111723240056 Land Use Number: LA21-000054 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: BETH A PAULSON Address: 2695 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 Applicant: Name: Michael Sharratt Company: Sharratt Design& Co. Address: 464 2nd Ave Ste 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 msharratt@sharrattdesign.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Michael Sharratt msharratt@sharrattdesign.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: • Associated Contact: Project Description: 3-season porch addition and deck Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application ❑ Subdivision Application ❑ Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: f r • file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(9).htm[8/12/2021 9:13:46 AM] Letter View Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA21-000054 . The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner desires a reasonable use of their property. Presently, there exists absolutely no buildable area by current ordinances adopted after the property was sub-divided and the current home was allowed to be built. Since the existing home more than substantially meets every other control (e.g., structural coverage, hardcover, maximum height, etc.), it would be unreasonable not to allow a small addition to be constructed as is proposed. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The owner did not create any of the circumstances of this extremely unique property, including sub-division, building of the existing home, and the earlier ordinances, all of which did allow this situation to happen as well as subsequently more restrictive revisions to same. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The character of the locality is single family homes. Some homes with lakeshore ? some without. This will not be altered. With the existing home being 1-story and a low pitched roof, the proposed project is totally sympathetic to that aspect of the locality and surrounding neighbors. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. eesponse: Economics are not at all a justification nor a practical difficulty of this application. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This application has no aspects relating to issues of solar energy systems or earth sheltering. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The proposed use is permitted within the present zoning classification/district. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Temporary use as a two-family dwelling is not related in any way to this proposal. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The conditions of this existing land and its existing structure are very peculiar as it relates to the ea in general. Only one other project of Sharratt Design?s projects in the City of Orono had no buildable a . . . that project was granted seven (7) variances/CUPs combined. This request will require one (1), to e best of our determination. file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(8).htm[8/12/2021 9:13:45 AM] Letter View 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The special conditions of this structure & land, and the totally restrictive impacts, do not apply most all properties in this district. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Granting this proposal is necessary to preserve and enrich the experience of lake living being the primary asset of this land and its location. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting this proposal will not impair or be contrary to any aspect of the intent of the ordinances that cause a site to have no buildable area. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Granting this proposal is not for convenience. Granting is necessary to allow a totally unbuildable site a reasonable use and very reasonable and minor improvement. • • file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form%20(8).htm[8/12/2021 9:13:45 AM] CITY OF ORONO PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES WORKSHEET FOR VARIANCES Beth Paulson 2695 Shadywood Road 1. "The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance." This variance request utilities the guidance of the zoning ordinance City Planning Staff through demonstrating practical difficulties in meeting exact ordinance requirements with specific situations which create an impossible ability to abide to the ordinance as written. It is these situations that the ordinance provides for exceptions to full compliance through a variance/public hearing process. The ultimate and honorable goal is to control yet still allow all properties to be put to a "reasonable use." This is the spirit of this application. 2. "The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan." The comprehensive plan does not suggest the subject property to change its designated use as a single family use;therefore, it is consistent. 3. "The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties." a. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;" The property owner desires a reasonable use of their property. Presently,there exists absolutely no buildable area by current ordinances adopted after the property was sub-divided and the current home was allowed to be built. Since the existing home more than substantially meets every other control (e.g., structural coverage, hardcover, maximum height, etc.), it would be unreasonable not to allow a small addition to be constructed as is • proposed. b. "There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;" The owner did not create any of the circumstances of this extremely unique property, including sub-division, building of the existing home,and the earlier ordinances, all of which did allow this situation to happen as well as subsequently more restrictive revisions to same. c. "The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality." The character of the locality is single family homes. Some homes with lakeshore—some without. This will not be altered. With the existing home being 1-story and a low pitched roof,the proposed project is totally sympathetic to that aspect of the locality and surrounding neighbors. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economics are not at all a justification nor a practical difficulty of this application. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This application has no aspects relating to issues of solar energy systems or earth sheltering. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." The proposed use is permitted within the present zoning classification/district. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 411 Temporary use as a two-family dwelling is not related in any way to this proposal. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." 41111 The conditions of this existing land and its existing structure are very peculiar as it relates to the area in general. Only one other project of Sharratt Design's projects in the City of Orono had no buildable area . . .that project was granted seven (7)variances/CUPs combined. This request will require one(1),to the best of our determination. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The special conditions of this structure& land, and the totally restrictive impacts,do not apply to most all properties in this district. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Granting this proposal is necessary to preserve and enrich the experience of lake living being the primary asset of this land and its location. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting this proposal will not impair or be contrary to any aspect of the intent of the ordinances that cause a site to have no buildable area. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Granting this proposal is not for convenience. Granting is necessary to allow a totally unbuildable site a reasonable use and very reasonable and minor improvement. • • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Exhibit C BETH PAULSON OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CHAPMAN ADDITION • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA / / / N6)71, // °o // `\ °p ,' °90 %/ EXISTING '1', r",, \;r HOUSE - A2685 , ' i - / \ i 1 W --.........------ ... , i i / soC �/ p. 70// II .......1' ?, BLACKTOP`', ".jj' / / / 4/ y^ / 41w\ Q I" S 22 SPRUCE .� e/— O` to SPRUCED ` .` � 4-4 ry 4*'''''''; 1, 1 ,f r, F4:'`` `r.� 950 \ `y�+ `¢7EP8`�,� B SPRUCE`1 .``\.I ```<``'` `1t2 BPRU E \ %! ',' ' '. ' `I Average Lakeshore t , // `4m44.,,,,,,-,,, �,� t`• I 24 @UrTERN,e R EXISTING Setback `, `, // 'G i1 ----- '4`•, HOUSE .b OSP�UCE R 1 I i • • /22 SPRUCE j",F�`�3 SPRUCE �¢ 895IA) j. ` \`.y'`` r/ /!�)` ` I`; i i HOUSff.!FX27 "3' .. F4.1 .�/.: ,:I 1111,1`\1`1; i® 92705E (ri .44;-+;:'," b y ' lE 4.4 j11-/-"a•-'S� . 11 111 11` BOAT .." _ ,. V YH. °/ c;,Bw939.1 a'.,// 1 1 HOUSE ... v 0 (K)//,'' �// 1 - + �,1L) Proposed Addition RIP 75'Lake Setback" 4R.`� . RAP �� lMl Y / j418 f 7'41 N. 70 o• -� . \, ,,S41,,,,\\N,IQRING : \` ` . •4' (u) °' ' CO)- / < ZV/ a° /% `'' [N f,' FOR LO liAKEACC.NO,16EMENT '4' / FOR LOT 1 PER DOC.NO.1803854 \`` LAKE ///,r .^ \MINNETONKA / 'r gY w So,.?j 44, i 0 ' N... J1 0 / LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2,Block 1,CHAPMAN ADDITION 0 30 60 120 •:Denotes found iron marker --936---:Denotes existing contour 0 *II**. -~1•01111•- This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,and existing house,drive,topography,major trees,and visible hardcover.It does not purport to show any other encroachments or Improvements. SCALE IN FEET REVISIONS 'L°°NE' !�a.w«�urr Mal as rlan waer d:«,«,D DATE aEN4as «u^.,mrb�wo-^Mo ¢2'-2' GRONBERG&ASSOCIATES, INC. am+mar l am aaey Licensed Land-Sums,° 7-21-21 ADDED PROP.DECK.PORCH Wm a me stets d Nyxbena. 1`-30' _ CMLENGMEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS 7-28-21 ADDED ADNL.INFO y� CHEESE, Jtse S _ 21-102 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 oA^.7-Z9¢/ som.MUSE MIMBEFI 7,,KS PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:952-473.4435 21-102 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BETH PAULSON OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CHAPMAN ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • (5; 90 / 00 00 / ..pO 90 / \ EXISTING ' HOUSE - ``al f`N #2685 / / ` /Q 1 // i // .� 1 / .` �" "'....// i Roc / ..`y.. .. / �/ /''''.. R .....'''/;...',, JjSr .....F 18)� / \`.`. 4/�. ,�O' Poi/ T`•,i ,'..`b?/ / `/ BLACKTOP'„ �'yY /// `5. / DRIVE ``` �.4 AA / glya,. . E7•. I • 22 SPRUCE QA" ^o/� ` •TG,6"ee SPRUCE,;,-..,:t. �g�- .. `•i ``` •�g� ` �� '' TR • L1`�ria<'^d 4' a 6Pa• 950 `` `y 11vRTEP6�.° -2 .`` ``I ``�`.,� sFRucE 1� •R-‘...4. O°°�^'^ '$� ! w RAE ``AV I i / �' .\• ?`• N_° �'+e EXISTING € ```. W • HOUSE y } ' 11 1 1 //22 SPRUCE �/'1'F `�30 SPRUCE °ill#2695(A) 's `x•1.1. / �i��` 11 1 1 1, \ r :; ; ; ; EXISTINGIII 1T[ PRUCE f i',,, 11 , 1 HOUSE c13 / tacrv� '�" ��, `;r./ 11 11 1i ® #2705 'Ns `'�`,� O1 4 r L . / i\,k - .`1,1 11111 1`111 BOAT _ ewe-ese1.° y% b i-`J HOUSE //'? ` i b�. r.. 1 044,; °"4,-,--,-.7.,, RIP (<) �1`- ' ��1�¢/ O / ..PAP \\y.M�I 1 w.®14i�A../p (wSFOP J `-�` \ `^..._,`.` f �Cw •y Ano f °re a '�>i it j `.�6a+ � ,� IS NIDE LAKE ACCESS EASEMENT \ I/ FOR LOT 1 PER DDC.NO.1803854 • \` LAKE i /{ 0 \ MINNETONKA /''" ^ sem° Ir & A a4. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2,Block 1,CHAPMAN ADDITION CI 3C) 60 120 •:Denotes found iron marker 1• _� _ --936---:Denotes existing contour . ml This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,and existing house,drive,topography,major trees,and visible hardcover.It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. SCALE IN FEET REVISIONS �Nnr 11-� a•sa•� � GRONBERG &ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE pOWeta p.p.SY.'.wun m p.wen a-Li-z1 and H...Os u.., sm..,w um. 7-21-21 ADDED PROP.DECK PORCH �� Sum If 1' 30' CIVIL ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS 7-28-21 ADDEDADNL INN 21-102 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 okr ,„N....Nuke.727SS .,.,. PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:952-473-4435 21-102 1 ,I 1 1 1 i • 1 1 I p . _ I N I 1 1 . i 0 I i \\ \\ i _ 1 i .„ , „ , ,i , , , „ , ....., , , 1 \ \ I , , . 1 • /i ;1 \ ' // // , \\ \\ j O I-7,4its, 1 1 j I , ,• // 1 ._ / // I / OZ 1.5£ 3 „OQOZ£ w �/ IE£OL I 1 I ' - r.r--- �.. 1 i.. o \ I I 1 ...... 1'•.. -+jE Z' r i91'b5 Jac*. —_- 00.09 6 (1 /I ; i ' , c -ft 7,7.) J I- 1 1r �J1 I-- Icaw � J� >J odun 0-1 41 I ! 47" /I1h W1 cc /I, ..,1.--; -N.% 4jI�I 01 ne •... 1 ‘,144,.-.:,,, 1 p / v7 . - I \J/ N ,p ii. QoN f/ ty\;1- N 1 i S 1 it - ^. L2 `�' 3�'� it / N I I Zl. • ciI I I 8 0 5 1 N rd �� a U�+^ sqv �I I N 606 ��6'� +_6$��` �J J i ) II/ 1 11 �1 4-CJ O 1 1- 'q•S z 4 / o I I N M o,0 ! I I o r Imo- 0 8or, LtQ4cp /!dJ I Z 1 / N z -,, 0 AY QOM O //� I j 11. t� f ii zit• �O 07/d,d�sc. �'./N/DD♦IU♦U 7 \\ 0J p I 1 I Q ��o ii i •s r 2d� \\\ oda i �� ii :, �/ \ 0- (> 0 1 s �/ I .:4461 / a , z p I LU I / 02 / 5d . --0 I 9 I IIy1 c6• ��J _:< �J / of 'i m� I p IN I 8 1 /•eS W / I I I U \ -rte 1 /0 U / II �• J i 1.L }- I 1 i m % Ir �S+ 1 \ n. I li. / W t- / 1 p 1 1 V 1 �. Q N ki Pct'' \I --- --_-- ,I • \\ '1 L 'OLZ 3 .,00,0£oZE N `1 so•o6\\' \ 11 \I i \.>>cS1 \\ 1 I\ i � O O7y \ 1 \ _ \ 1 I I V, 8-- \\ '1 11 I \ 1. ' 111 w 1''','Zil" . ..‘1, • .... •' Or 2..'i'74t. .."''NI 11'4 r ../.... '•••A ,.''''P • ''' ..1 ,,.'':.';'‘'.., . ::-.. 37::i....... 44'• .../ a 40l. . .. . ....: . - A lab. .4 .0 q • ,.,.• f . -:.t•'r...1.) ' • ,. ., - .:. .'' 4/44 : I' ' ,. .:- -. ":"--4:',..:--','',-- ..1 • - 4i''''0"-- ' - Ai. ft-4 ,#.. •'.....'-. . '`- .1,.-'`,i •-;;;',ii-_,.1-'- ''',-.. '-;f:Z..,7:.'6 ,,;'. li-,,'....:, -4/ ',. ...jrir- ,-,'.. ,, .., :: '•\ : . , ,.. ... .-''' - -' -,...Ttr,"- • ..,..,. ,. _ .,.i. ,,... ;,..,...... , ...,........ ,. • . _.,..,4,,,, - _ -..,4,••• ,• ,,,-..:",..•/"., .4:. N, .-: .- ,,,,,. : 0,—, - ,,. . ._,,,, .,.,;..,, ' - ,. .: ,. . ,- :::.__-.•-*„.,-.,-, , .; 2 , *. --...,• --:: :-,..„,/../.,-,,,- :.,',..r..z.,.-. c:- T . -",1 - - -,-, 4 .-;,-:',..,: --,/,-,-......-- -oi,t •-- ...--n- .; 7",....4",..; *4::•.'",• / t ... :', ..-. . . '..,',...e.•--'..,, ' . '''...,...:'...aitg.-L t• • -;•4 .,-,44!. . :,_. .., ,,•..:-'7.,.., -, . ,,••......,,•, ,_ •7:41, ; ! ..'•'.,....t' -• Ar st. ;• .;;- ' .:'''' , .., , ...,... ., . ...., . k ‘ littistilitt„ „-- . • I 'N•' ' .:',..• -..,'. ,...-, .. . ...,. ' - ... . ., -•-• eclN'.' ...," '''?'''. ',. / T .'' ' • N. 445 ,,,,,440.',41,' ...* • . • - - , •....,.... • ,t *ke. . •I , ''''. i . .. • 0•• ?- A.,,..._. ' -.* '.',`',4'4•1 ' . ._ . .. v.i „,.• • . . . ..„. , . . ,. ... . ..01;" . ' ' • • > •..' -: ''',... ,.,. .,,, ie,-.. - ''.: -? . : .',"r ...., .• -' ''..7:,,‘4%'•:,-.-.. .,. ...., .., . ..„, •, , •L 1.• .'doc . ?1,---.*A.._ ,, ,..,.. _. - • . .,iy.. 3,4, t•-.7--- , , , "' virii -,/ .,.......... ./ , .., c ---; ..,-- -1.„:1, ,_., Aratil,..,.. ._ -N.-- -.,,-7 '-- ... 3.- ,:-'4' e- • ' 4.:-.-.4: •-•.? ;'- - _ ".',`,'.,,At- --'t.,..-.'1--41/.. .1k t",..-.', : *-7 ..' . --•_ , Fr (## i- =,Ir ,. ''''' • ' -* i-f- fr- j ' 1.0. . ' }? j. ' •' • .1. ._-: .. ... . . .',. .......S 1. .' t /IP. VI''1 .7 ...-- r 'at' . ,,_,..... ...., ,., .. .. : .,..„ , - - ., .. '' '-' - .' 4 pop . *41 V,,,j _ rill . • . . . . '••, -P • . L '..'• .- . . ... -. . . ,... • . ,,,.. .„..., .,,.„. . _.,.. , .... ...„.., „...,....„. ,...i. .. , „......,., . . __., T.,,,..„..,. --s ::.:4:i-T-'- -•-_1- .-. , ,_., _.. •,•' ::'•' 4 . . .. . _,:.,:, . .c _ . 44. - : .t.' -.'A.e.,.. .... t ' pa •'':6: 4V: -4 . ..., .e..e.,.P...... . .., . , • • .., • . 0 , , • . • - ...4 ... ' .+.,,. ''''•• ..... ' . A '4, •,52Yr - . , ....„„ .--,',... , :•:—.,.. ,.- - - . .• ' .4:PI,', t. , ., ,. . . . 16• '. ..'.:' .'''. .''';', '.1; . ':.:' . „ -' -• ' ' - fe, k •-• -*- t.'.. ' -',. -. 47- -....': . . -. ....... . , .. .. ,_• . . . .. ..- . • . • ;al-) . - - . ' 1 - % • • . •4 -;•4` : '• '' .. • -•. ..-..:i.:•,,..t.,..,,,,:. ..,x;v:',.- '-4-.-- • -..,...,:- , ......., ...:. „;,. •. , .. . , , ..-.'....,.: .; . ''''%'.f, • F. ......-.*. '- t g• 4 ' :4. . ,4.ir ',,,,, 'f . St„..t ' . ..411:j 0=''-'' '-',',.,•-%;:'rol, .4.7.4,-. .‘ - . I _,,,...--...,-. l ,i4-'4. ,..-.i* - .t.ieNIi.;,... -'. -1,• -..-• - 't - • ,- . . .;.• ....:‘ . .1.,,r.. Alf,"-,),*-., - . t'4-.-- • ,' . .. ,.. wt.-- . ; 4 ...:- z• .-;.- ,-, 4:.- _ , . „.., .... ..., .• ... •. ..4 ' ...4.-.X, • .... .. ..... . . .. 1 . ', :,;'.1:N.':;.= -4...--. -• ':7'..',.4:-- • ,, s' 4 • .,.;; . ---. 404 i Al1 . . ., ' ' .' t' 4 ' -Ni.-- ! Y 1+,.,/1,_',•,., -.-:. • ,,: , . - '.."N"t .a...t.‘-:,.' ..:-.."- 1 :I.,.•kt.le'..: 4,- 7. . ,. .4_,...:-k-Vie .t1'''''' ...' • I-, .... -• - -war- ,tit • %.-.2.:-. -::itf . , '.'s- ••- 1 .-t... •••*),• i .0:7' I •' . -1, •"`• r . ...- - --?.. :' •' - -2•••*. " -' -,4 - . - • ,, :;.:-.• -,... , , . • . •....0 ,...„5,,, ...-.--. .-._,4,-..,c:. ....,if.: •p-,., .'... ... .., ...,:t.),:. , .. 4.:i..,.._1 ,..-`,., .-_-, _._ ----.,=,1r.:.•,,,' •. •• -...c•-• -,..-,•- • ,.... •,... ,.... . _ ,,.. ilk -.----,• .••••47N4.417v,,,- !., . _ ,1, , ,...,-..! :`,- ...:„.1i--: ,,,-:- ..k.- - ..1 'ft, *-t,'•,:.;,. . • - ::„..s-'?./c,..' •,... -. 0 . . i'. 4011* . •, • , _ . .. ' -,. .. .;,..4.„; -4... ,,•,• • - /.„,,,, -. • . • ., . . , ,- -,ii..*_.47..,,,s ,''''','',.., ,..%.- ,• . ,A... . -.......,... _ ., '4,•:"4;.1 e.":...A.,..• . s ,...„i,..r- . . , A: ' i 'tit.. • -' 'P'''. •• • - A- k. . ', . , ..,,,, *I. '0'7‘..-.,*;"4`..4. .‘,44." - . '.% ;:-..--.'.:-..• r "r.'", '''''''' -4- ''''-.1;-'.2 -- .. . ' ' ' - ,y* ' , . . ,r4'!" '', -,... . ,: ' '4' 't,.''.•••,-,:. - ;;, ' t, .. . ../,''' . -.a, -.t - at'''' 44 -'".-f, •- - ''. 1. ' Kik' 't,.. ,.. ..__ _, ...„... , .. ,...,_ .. .,... . , , .,...„._._ _ ...41,,,,,,..,.....„..... 00, •, , _. .... .. .... _ , , • „ • . ; , ''. ,. -'''.., ,:2*., -: •-,...-: .' Oltr . ‘..,iii' ;Ir.' .1,4.f.i, ,6,.,...,',:like,'•-,.: ,,,,.':l,"!..- ' , 4 . :V., , -',.4•44#4-4,„ - '4.4-:,;-..it: 't - i* ' ' • ' . ''''-',, Z-:''-''', ‘.' •','''' , ... • , ' /''''' ,. ., ,'"',..,,,,,. ...,•t.). ,,,,,:,...c.,....c..1. ..„,,' . ,.710, . ..,....,,,,s, 0. ' . . . . . , . ..."47• ,..•. ...it:z....„,‘....,..e. 7 , -• ,. -- • . . - - • .7 , .44 ,t+15t. . , . A -'...,.' - - --- - .,..• .. ._ ... . . ,..,..-.!.... ,_..:.., •-• ...:,,t , tot . .. ... i.._ •- ....:.;. .,...., .-xi;.-., 4...t. .,. ,- • • - ..- .p•:. ••-..,.. , - . • ,--,-. ...- • 4- . • • _ . ,i. - . - .....,.../ • •,-r, -,•. , .., . .,...-4., ,..- .-- .4,. . ... -I.. 44..: N.,.,..,.„..•:: 4.:., s.."Vie*i-`,,ra,.„," r,-,,I.1,, if:' . l' -' - • ' flail.*".* t 'to .; ' l'" I:• - - ,4:' r :...!/ .0"'.... ., .;‘, .-.::' •' 4.--.ye 11.i--• '`'',''.. ''' / ' . '• ' . fr 7- ; *;, ,,, .-.,-11I - . ' " ' ' - '^ )...- -'--." .i.doc?- - ...-. ' - 4.,.-i.....,''''';';1',-•"`It. . ....:".., :'.'" '.. 7 4-•-• . •„, i! ''.. r 2"V .- • , ' r 4 -,".".:,.. .. ''. ' 't.:ir-, , _ .•",-•, ...,.....„,r.f1;.,.. , is,..!?1..,..;•• " .,,'' . '''''"Gr"ii. ' ,/, -• - :1 r'','-': , ,—* ),#1,,' -'V.,r 4.- • 'I.,'11;' • i" r', ' .....'v• .,. .• • r ••:, .• .„„--..„ . .Ar . . ... ,. ..., I. .i..-..•, ,,., ...1.4*... .,. ..•.. -° .• - - • .: ,"6'I'' .** ' ' -.4 - :_- :, 40,-,:•:.-' ..,-;„, —,.-,:,-. /-... --. , ,,A. •)y-..,..,-,', -, • -, ...,.-. . . , ... ..!....-,:,',. ,-,..-4. ,.,,, '.,ii--:i..i ' •;:`,-.. . i'''-,-,-,-,.. •••• -,. .,... --.'; .. . Lyly . ,..il, .. . ' -; '-...-i.,_ -'--,..,,-,- • • , ,,..„,, .,. ,,, ,,,.;,.' i! ..,.....„ . ... _.,„,. :,,, ,„ . ...,, . ,.,........„. • ,:, .,,,, ,,, . '----,,T;',-..,....,----474.' .tr•:::".r.f..-i - -,._ 1 ' .-. • ,-- ..- , .„--,.. ,-,=,; ...-:,.. n •- • •-..:!.. , -, .:!...;-,- -- -i:-?-: - , . . . . .... L. • , „_ ,''' ,..,:444...L. , 7':**tC.'4.,. t' . s:''.- :„,•, - ..; ‘'.:',;. -ill ••• '.4 .e kb... ' :''''', ''''' ' •, ' ', i- ' - - '.7' ,, ••• - _ IN, ' ..• '. * ...` ' It'''' '''''', '11, -**, -'''' * .4.:^ ' .• ..... ..,- •,. ,,"",St- ',- ,i, .... i •k-;,„/.1 _ 4- ....• . - •_,N.,, ,. i‘: ' ' ,s,- .., - '• - • - '.5' _ ' .?: r ; •..... ., .741itkr . . . . . ,,.. ...'t.:.•- . ...,..• .1 • , , 4I -..,--- 1.;. .' - ;'.x.,4°....' 4 -....„,;,V .• • . 4.. . .,) p. ' t. .'-' "` - ' AI:,• • . , . t r,- . V i ,, .„,,,•• ".'• : ,,,#1, . ' - •.' ,. , ..,,, -. -.' . . -'• 4,..";-, '------ r:i.- '- 4.'4.,."..' ' ' ' • , . :. .,..r.A ,..!,..-- -.... 4.•,,Y:,.•-,... ,5 .- ... ,. :.-: .'...".:'•..",. •. • ..- ,0„....:,,, -. •.,, .k •:, • ,. '" -' . --. ''. ,..* ;-.. • ".17:-- :'•--.4* I. , •,:•,_•,. ,..:•*''' ' -i 4! .‘" , '-`• * '. -••''' 40:101, ,,,,,, • -' 4• -;4;•••- •.' • „.0,s', ...-' '14 ..-.•':•.:.4 A.,;' •' ..:„. '49 lip• '- ,e, • -0 . •!'''‘','-t,,•.-•..'z:,- w ° -.-•,. ::".1' ' . ,... t•, „ . - 7,-.'.1,s-,V1,',-4.',.7-.,."," swiii t.,,,..i.p . . .., - -...,:z..A..--. .-,,, . . . • . . .... • ... ..„„ .1'4.!‘mti.'" ::.; ...,: , ! 44,,i f...1 ii' TV it .: , y ••'-',- - ...,!-. •.-,,, -...4 --,:,.- . .4.. ,, _, . .*.r.....p_ . ...4 • , , -., AA.,•... .,. -•,- „. 4-,. {s. :iv ;, I , .. .►' .` a lite' KGs w y it ;� . , r � ” t e+ �f' f 4 "4144 • 0 aoR4. r� #e t J, 1 4 ..j sh `t" gy r � '44 v � !f i r4 ,7 }l ;11.24 �' Jr11 s 1I it t 4 9f0 } 'j t r .71' / , r'orf 4$ , . *1'1' r ..,-.1 . .„F., r'.f ,' S ,y.„,,...,„,,.., #yej• i r' n f ly 1 2 4 M • > ,' / ! ` 41 '';',' ' '' '"';, - "l'''' . . ,"ZAC: ' ' - ' /. ' .„4:004stl 0'•.4 , '„A•W,.,. ' „ . ..I .. . " ...... ii:V, '''' .% 1- '`'I'' '') "' LJ ,*If', *.. 4,. fff l ! ...'3 { - 4 ..; a s • j .. ..:r • • f � A .s4' •'r. { ,1 yI ':; � ilfe i..4-. ,,' y^ ,„.4,...t � '4r • -roller P, AI + Ilk, al':,,, 6, 4ert 4, -l` Y� •may44#110- ir' ' 't Y 'ice•" . . • At c s I i ti a[ tee-' ,'' *;s / ww yv y._Y r 9 n +�r�s 1 A � f 7' t e 4v ' 'i s'''tir~, It ,i l ,,„4 .„ # r ti? t' �1' ". ,. a a • a xv 4 d` r ,»' •« }'''111":::k,*,rA. )" ,} . •*try 4 lt • at. , 71. 3. 1 ! per Ii+ 't8,•a y t voiiiit jj t x ; k '..«��• , ' ,t .. 7° ' h,i `1 FfA{ ` C, • S ^# #tl • ,W a.t _,i ,,.0. tt t. M M '•y1� y sir`„Y i f i• w ��¢ 1 4 rte +i++ ix7 �4k4, • w 4., ►yt' •Y w ctet; ° 4 1 v ., 40406;4it.,,,.- r� ,: r� 4 s ,. a r. V7 ..�, , .,4, ••..k. x ,V ' IP IIII lot rr t � ' + ti.. 7 *, .:k,,,' yrt � f f_ ...lit,„.,.....„. . .-..r . , ' -,,,,_1; 4”: V a t , "y j(yy.,, , RST r as .pr t,. v. £. 7 .s '1,1*`` N. 7 p. tri ;I- • ,, 4, A ii ,_ k , , .. __ .,, -.-. _ ., :T7 + JAI • Ij 4 . H ' • d . 1 Iii-i, old 1E 1 9R Mx 4 I . ,I f Is �en I - • i I a i - LI i I � VI H " !-I . of , I 1A' �` • !1 IaI i I1 . i jj i j lI -_,. IN -- . ' II I S I ' � i • • • 11)! • n\ '1, I i - I /›.\..? . I • p III -'*11.I ol - ,4 . ! 1 ' 1 �• y; iyN1 ► I 1 ,.. ll �__: , . 2 I p'' J I t ! ,.. I . j ei v2 KiL— ! o- . obi„ I • 4_ r� Sh ~ I I 3 0 — I , F " 4 t 3`� �� W 1 c -'.% �� '1 fl � a v al I -j ! � � 1 4-:, ad-1. -: ;; ! v,0, 1s ' I,% ' ! 'a y ', t El . , f . ..,__ ___,_ \__._.... . .,. ! ri • ' la* 1J----- . LH III A ; !': 1 , I y, c=„ 4 4,J jD x 1.4 ill tisjil . . ;:kt. %......ik ,____,___,L..1./ I N/ ' I Ii 1 it I I I • i 1 i . 0 i • ; vi 1 1 . , . . . i t4 i . , 1 ______ I_,. ...__. . 4, . 11 I •,:i• .41 t - 1 . . . II I 1 1,1 I, 3 , H Al . 1 L ir 1 1.1! , .. --- -I --I-, 1 ._ i, -r-p- 1 H i ... 1 __ j I • .ul V, 11 'sill I 1 i I , kl . 11 I !- 1 ;1 1 II a . t! 1 iN I I.21 i i 1 ID Ni 1 i\ •t- 1 4 _ _ --"A--- -J-1 -1 * 1- .. • 0 3,, 1 1 _.‘ A 111: N I 1 . t -/+ 1 le ' ! -1— 14 ik t, ) \ 14'' li -1, I . '. lir " i ,aZ ekla-437-71 - • 4 44-71 a.44 I I • , . , -. ______ L.... _40, ' � i H :1to , _ ,i,;........i4 4, : , 7_ _4 1 ul a : I g ; l ! ! A �' 1 1 1 I‘k., i —4 I 4i d d I H ,,i I I , ' i i 1 A� I I I I • 11r_ iiii .!.. ! ' i i it 1 t ff.( fl � f1. /is. , c%, i 1 11 ul c A cl-- 4.-1 iii 1 1- `' �'� ` S j11 1 MD ' _ - 1 -A - v — 1, -- i • t' I o r I 1 i I �� i 1 i 9 ' _...,\ 1, Ji I I I1tk I ,li j ,..\:1 1 j1jiiIu1iI -11 lit 1 K/fil t— i �� 0 _ + \ / 1 7 .1... , i. il ,/, 1 — - law 1 % . / II .„. . ......, q Ill Llm.....i -1‘ : e ,,ii \ I ,, "!= .___ ,, ,, , i .., \ , , i2 Nil 1 -Li A 11- IIt a ci, . i . f. , „__J ,, ., t Ili ii -' - --)'il o; „ ,y i,,, . ,t. .....,, :[I; .� CI q. 11 1I v hcil ' . P. I � • Exhibit E City of Orono w3„.04,0 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: if, At ,,z 2 695 .1NX10rwa¢o "0'449 (8E711/ Aeu4J'o,U) '+sNo•` Prepared by: Date: GRovtio-AC .4 A'1'loc/4Tr ,i,s/c_ 7-U-4/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:oP ARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key Surveo Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Y (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) . (24'x 30') A (720 S.F.) ,4au.fe <FX/fr, i-.') 2268 S.F. B Derr< C r ir, o ., S i 8 S.F. D S 7ERS 1 5 S S.F. .l E A Roe/ „ BS S.F. F l.+vit`/( 9SS.F. G Q,,f2/4/E-- •• 285 S.F. H Rack Softie/Z.1' „ _. 1245V S.F. IC- S.F. I I Ate /A Q „ (To IF/tote-O) 9 S.F. J FtRF 4eltiG 10 • K AOrK R`T. W44.4 �, / S.F. L 3/ S.F. itaf!/JFa f C�t6FN D MrN 256 S.F. M /Aa/OJ6D ,CCK 26S S.F. N N0 _, S.F. P S.F._ 0 S.F. S.F. RS.F. T S.F. S.F. V S.F.: W S.F. X S.F._ Y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 54/7/ S.F. Excludable Hardcover(Sea City Code Sec 78-1684): K AO ct< it 6 T_. GciA[,L 3 ,' S.F. S.F._ S.F._ S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 3 / S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover (Subtract line(2)from line(1)] syet p S.F. (4) Total Lot Area A ocive 5i2.4.c/ S'O1vi�442 .38 5169 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] /,j.9 6 % • Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an informationacket p regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 Exhibit F ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM • I(we) . \ UQIOrcl1 of ;7r/en �In VU�-'4' >G► t' k (print name(s)] [print add ss] PAS have revi , ewcd the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Iso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval o le property or u e but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvem- • .ns and that th:. •roposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. P irQ •wner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM • I (we) 31 viA`16..1ArtVV 1t1 r ,z v`of 9-10`1.3 '-,r,„( [print name(d)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at AIS '51evIJYtr•--d also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the im vement plans --• that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property 0 er I Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form—January 2021 • Exhibit G Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map • Date: 7/23/2021 G `:>5 € b4\ 2660 ... %yr1� 2670 . !673 1 a _. s,. I • t 412680 Ai> �ilyPf� O- A. k: ( 44:Viti. 2670 *a ¢n 2675 S3i ipso ,�, Mt -..44,-,, - • 2700 , 2693 2720 42' 2685 30) 2730 2700 "7r 11, al 2727 ?695 2705 ray 2730 '' • /;-,.., s, .,:i..,,:-. 2760 2735I':. : .64n i r'` '0 . ant d 65 illoirio , 1t 2 ) li ;.,15 7r Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I i i i l ( i ) I 2695 Shadywood Rd. This data (i) is furnshed 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(i)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying • purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from the data. For route information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,M i nn ea pd i s,MN 55487/gis.info©hen ne pin.us RUN DATE:07/23/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 21-117-23 23 0014 38 21-117-23 23 0058 38 21-117-23 24 0037 PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNERS T J MAHONEY&K A MAHONEY THOMAS G WINTZ REV TRUST • 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2760 PHEASANT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 PHEASANT LAWN HOMEOWNERS TIMOTHY H MAHONEY THOMAS G WINTZ 2700 PLEASANT RD 2760 PHEASANT RD 2680 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0017 38 21-117-23 24 0003 38 21-117-23 24 0038 MICHAEL J CULLEN ET AL S S NEWRAI&J E NEWRAI MARGARET L LOWE REV TRUST 2700 PHEASANT RD 2705 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 MICHAEL J CULLEN SOHRAB S NEWRAI MARGARET L LOWE 2700 PHEASANT RD JULIE E NEWRAI 2630 LAFAYETTE RD W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2705 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0019 38 21-117-23 24 0004 38 21-117-23 24 0039 L W GETLIN&D I GETLIN M D&R A MEEK ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER 2690 PHEASANT RD 2725 SHADYWOOD RD 2655 WEST LAFAYETTE RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 LAWRENCE&DEBORAH GETLIN MICHAEL D&ROBERTA A MEEK ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER 2690 PHEASANT RD 2725 SHADYWOOD RD 2655 W LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0020 38 21-117-23 24 0005 38 21-117-23 24 0045 M A&K M DOLLIFF JOHN MATACHEK MARGARET L LOWE REV TRUST 2680 PHEASANT RD 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 MATTHEW&KATHLEEN DOLLIFF JOHN MATACHEK MARGARET L LOWE 2680 PHEASANT RD 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 2630 LAFAYETTE RD W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0021 38 21-117-23 24 0028 38 21-117-23 24 0046 JEANNETTE L WYATT MERI L AULT ET AL THOMAS G WINTZ REV TRUST 2670 PHEASANT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2680 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 JEANNETTE L WYATT UNDIVIDED THOMAS G WINTZ • 19 HAWKEYE PL 2680 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING TX 77381 ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0022 38 21-117-23 24 0029 38 21-117-23 24 0047 PATTI J PETTY/PAUL B PETTY JOHN R MATACHEK ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER 2660 PHEASANT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2655 WEST LAFAYETTE RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 PATTI J&PAUL B PETTY JOHN R MATACHEK ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER 2660 PHEASANT RD 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 2655 W LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0023 38 21-117-23 24 0030 38 21-117-23 24 0051 T J HADDEN&J M JOHNSON KELLY A LABATT ANDREW ASBURY/DEANNA ASBURY 2600 PHEASANT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2660 MAPLERIDGE LA ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 T J HADDEN&J M JOHNSON KELLY A LABATT ANDREW ASBURY 2600 PHEASANT RD 2700 SHADYWOOD RD DEANNA MAE ASBURY EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2660 MAPLERIDGE LA ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0050 38 21-117-23 24 0031 38 21-117-23 24 0052 MARION H BROWN KELLY A LABATT AMOS KIDRON&ORIT KIDRON 2685 SHADYWOOD RD 2700 SHADYWOOD RD 2670 MAPLERIDGE LA ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 MARION H BROWN KELLY A LABATT AMOS KIDRON&ORIT KIDRON 2685 SHADYWOOD RD 2700 SHADYWOOD RD 2670 MAPLERIDGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0052 38 21-117-23 24 0032 38 21-117-23 24 0053 MARK C&ANITA S RIDGE B A KVAM&J C KVAM TRUSTEES JOHN CROTTEAU/DONNA CROTTEAU 2720 PHEASANT RD 2720 SHADYWOOD RD 2675 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 MARK C&ANITA S RIDGE JOHN C&BEVERLEE A KVAM JOHN CROTTEAU 2720 PHEASANT RD 2720 SHADYWOOD RD DONNA CROTTEAU EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2675 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0057 38 21-117-23 24 0036 38 21-117-23 24 0055 . M M COTTER&J A COTTER J R GAGNE&V L GAGNE J G WARNER JR&W J R WARNER 2730 PHEASANT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2693 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 MARGARET M COTTER JAMES R GAGNE JAMES G WARNER JR JEFFREY A COTTER 2615 WEST LAFAYETTE RD WENDY J ROAL WARNER 2730 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2693 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 RUN DATE:07/23/2021 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 21-117-23 24 0056 • BETH A PAULSON 2695 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 BETH A PAULSON 2695 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0060 T M RANDGAARD/M J BARRETT TR 2765 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 THOMAS M RANDGAARD 1730 KENWOOD PKWY MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 38 21-117-23 24 0061 LEIGHTON FAMILY TRUST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 STEVEN&DONNA LEIGHTON 8830 POINTE VISTA DR VICTORIA MN 55386 38 21-117-23 24 0063 S SHANNON&C SHANNON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 RANDY&TRACY GUSTAFSON 19565 ROSEDALE AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0064 J R MINER&S L MINER 2730 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 JAMES R MINER • STEPHANIE L MINER 2730 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0065 KIMBERLY K SCHOTTLER 2740 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 KIMBERLY K SCHOTTLER 2740 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 31 0003 JOE JASPERSEN 2745 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 JOE JASPERSEN 2745 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0003 D E HABERMAN&H R HABERMAN 2799 PHEASANT RD ORONO MN 55331 DONALD E HABERMAN HEIDI R HABERMAN 2799 PHEASANT RD ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0004 JAMES D ECHTENKAMP ET AL 2800 PHEASANT RD ORONO MN 55331 JAMES&JEAN ECHTENKAMP 2800 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 • • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • •