The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/13/2021 Septic Compliance Inspection reportMMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Compliance inspection report form 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Doc Type: Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation — additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: httos://www. oca. state. mn. us/sites/default/files/wc-wwists4-31 a. odf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 15 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Property address: 105 Orono Orchard Road, Orono Owner/representative: Kelly Lowe Owner's phone: 952-686-3941 Brief system description: 2 - 1000 gal septic & 1000 gal pump tank with a mound System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 5/13/2021 ®Compliant —Certificate of compliance* Noncompliant —Notice of noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A.04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1500 as of system status date above and does not guarantee future performance. An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A.04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required bylocal ordinance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) — Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) —Failing to protect groundwater ❑ System not abandoned according to Minn. R. 7060.2500 (Compliance component #3) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil separation (Compliance component #5) — Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) — Noncompliant -local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the purpose of processing this form. Business name: Sewer S wCes Certification number: C1659 Inspector signature: License number: 2502 (1151s doc nenthas been elecb nically signed) Phone: 952-873-3292 Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) ® Soil observation logs ® Locally required forms ® Tank Integrity Assessment ❑ Operating Permit ❑ Other information (list) https://www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 1 of 1. Impact on public health — Compliance component #1 of 5 criteria: System discharges sewage to the ❑ Yes' ® No ground surface System discharges sewage to drain ❑ Yes* ® No the or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into ❑ Yes` ®No dwelling or establishment. Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: Searched for surface outlet or ground discharge Checked for back-up Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Other: ® Not applicable 2. Tank integrity— Compliance component #2 of 5 criteria: System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes' ®No cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, Sewage tank(s) leak below their ❑ Yes' ® No designed operating depth? Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Pumped & Inspected Attached supporting documentation: ® Pumped at time of inspection Name of maintenance business: Sewer Services License number of maintenance business: 2502 Date of maintenance: 5/13/2021 ❑ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mm/dd/yyyy): (must be within three years) (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 8 (1)) ❑ Tank is Noncompliant (pumping not necessary — explain below) ❑ Other: https://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 2 of 3. Other compliance conditions — Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? ❑ Yes* ® No ❑ Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? ❑ Yes' ® No ❑ Unknown *Yes to 3a or 3b -System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non -protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? ❑ Yes' ® No 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? ❑ Yes' ® No *Yes to 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Inspected Attached supporting documentation: M Not applicable ❑ 4. Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #4 of 5 M Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design /f the answer to both questions is "no" this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria: a. Have the operating permit requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any "no" answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: Attached supporting documentation: ❑ Operating permit (Attach) ❑ hups://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relayservice • Available in alternative formats wq-ww1sts4-31b • 1/11/21 Page 3 of S. Soil separation — Compliance component #5 of 5 Date of installation 6/1/2006 ❑ Unknown (mm/dd/yyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food beverage lodging? Compliance criteria (select one): 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfeld has at least a two -foot vertical separation distance from periodically 5b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, orlodging establishment: Drainfeld has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* 5c. "Experimental"; "Other", or "Performance" systems built under pre -2008 Rules; Type / v or V systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfeld meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically ❑ Yes ® No Attached supporting documentation: ® Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) ❑ Two previous verifications of required vertical ❑ Yes ❑ No' separation (Attach) ❑ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) 171 ® Yes ❑ No* ❑ Yes ❑ No* *Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: Boring 1-12" 10yr2/2loam 13-24" 10yr 4/4 clay loam Redox @ 22" Indicate depths or elevations A. Bottom of distribution media 18"+ B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 22" C. System separation 40" D. Required compliance separation* 36" *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance. Upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. if an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 • 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 4 Owner: Jamie Lowe Date: 4/7/06 Location: 105 Orono rchard Road, Orono Method used to seasonal water table: (Soil Boring, Elevations and Records) Soil Boring 1 Ground elevation @boring 97.0 Depth of Boring 3.5 ft. Seasonal water table depth r elev. 3.0 ft. Standing water table depth elev. Elev. of bottom of drainfieL media Limiting layer depth or e1evj 94.0 Sampling Location A B Ground elev. @ sample 1'on 100.0 100.0 Depth to bottom of drainfiel media 1.83 ft. 1.7 ft. Elev. of bottom of drainfieL media 98.17 98.3 • X tis` M \Y\ b of �`�� I, �+L lanky &A lbf-"W'0A au>1d SySTtw1 MSTS ` a division of WRM Services, Inc. P.O. Box 458 o SIG Kimball, MN 55353 Phone: (320) 398-2705 Fax: (320) 398-2075 Page 2 of 2 SOIL PROFILE LOG Client: Streeter Associates, Inc. Date: -4/11/06— Completed By: _Jeremy George & Jeremy Donabauer Project/LegaUAddress:_105 Orono Orchard Road, Type of Observation: Bucket Auger Vegetation: wooded Landscape Position: side slope Observation # 1 Elevation: Horizon Depth Soil texture Matrix color Redox. Color(s) or Features Grade Consistence 0-6 Loam (fill) 10yr 2/1 Weak Friable 6-30 Sand (fill) IOyr 5/4 ffBlocky Massive Loose 30-36 Loam 2.5y 3/2 Weak Friable 36-40 Loam 2.5y 5/4 I Oyr 6/6+5/2 Weak Friable Depth to Restrictive layer: 3.0 ft. Depth to standing water table: not encountered Other comments: MSTS Kimball, MN 55353 Phone: (320) 398-2705 Fax: (320) 398-2075 SOIL PROFILE LOG Client: Streeter Associates, Inc. Date: -4/11/06— Completed By: _Jeremy George & Jeremy Donabauer Project/Legal/Address:_105 Orono Orchard Road, Orono Type of Observation: Bucket Auger Vegetation: wooded Landscape Position: aide slope Observation # 2 — _. -- — — ---- ----- -Elevation: --- — Horizon Depth Soil texture Matrix color Redox. Colo s or Features Shape Grade Consistence 0-5 Loam IOyr2/1 Blocky Weak Friable 5-18 Sandy loam IOyr 3/6 Blocky Weak Friable 18-24 Sandy clay loam 1Oyr 5/4 Blocky Weak Friable 24.30 Sandy clay loam IOyr 5/4 IOyr 6/8+5/2 Blocky Weak Friable Depth to Restrictive layer: 2.0 ft. Depth to standing water table: not encountered Other comments: MSTS Kimball, MN 55353 Phone: (320) 398-2705 Fax: (320) 398-2075