HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 7173 III II mil mil
LAND TYPE Abstract (A)
DOC NUM 10935930
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Mar 24, 2021 9:28 AM
Office of the County Recorder
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, County Recorder
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 161 Pkg ID 2202624E
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
-OAT CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�• NO. 7173
4kEsu0
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-1279 (6)
FILE NO. LA21-000008
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2021, Brad Barinski o/b/o BJB trust("Applicant"), applied
for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1825 Lakeside Trail and legally
described as:
Lot 4, Block 1, Willow Bay Sanctuary, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the
"Property");
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 (6)to allow construction of a structure
lakeward of the Average Lake Shore Setback line; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at
which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity
to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the variance; and
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application and the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning the Property:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA21-000008. The analysis contained
within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the
above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings
are hereby incorporated by reference.
1
8,7LON. CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 7 1 7 3
c,
4&ESH0°-
2. The Property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District.
3. The Property contains 3.52 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 210/200 feet.
4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater
Quality Overlay District.
5. Applicant has applied for the following variance:
a. Average Lake Shore Setback
6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values
of property in the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when:
1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of
the average lake shore setback is to preserve neighboring properties' views of the lake. The
proposed encroachment will not impact these views.
2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed use of the lot for
residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as is the preservation of lake
views and Shoreland management.
3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties.
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by the official controls; The placement of the house is a reasonable location given the
intent of the ordinance to preserve views, and manage sensitive environmental
concerns.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the
location of the neighboring house, the presence of a tributary, and the previous
discussions of a 'new'ALS where not created by the land owner and
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The encroachment into
the ALS will not impact the character of the locality.
Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as
follows:
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations
have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
2
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 7 1 7 3
�
,�kESHOR
5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in
Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition
is not applicable.
6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono
City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This
condition is not applicable, as single family residential is a permitted use in the LR-1A zoning
district.
7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a
two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable.
8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property
or immediately adjoining property. The tributary that runs along the north side of the lot, and
the previous discussion regarding a 'new' ALS has been considered in previous lakeshore
subdivisions.
9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land
is located. The applied ALS is based on the lot to the east, 770 Brown Road N, which is
substantially distan7 from the subject property and the lake.
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant. The tributary and its 75'setback limit buildable sites consistent
with the character of the neighborhood.
11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort or morals,
or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed encroachment is
not anticipated to impair any health or safety goals of the city.
12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variance is permitting a buildable site that
was intended to be approved as part of this subdivision.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS:
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 (6) to allow construction lakeward of
the Average Lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings.
2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated January 18, 2021 submitted by
the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A.
3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
3
-OAp CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
y� G1 NO. 7 1 7 3
.kEsHO`-c'
4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction and commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of
Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 8, 2022).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may
result in the termination of any authority granted herein.
ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of March, 2021.
ATT ST: CITY OF ORONO:
/ Ajp,
iL L -�
- na Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor
4
Line B
Line C
Line A
Resolution No. 7173