My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2282 rebuild
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Arm Drive
>
1125 North Arm Drive- 07-117-23-14-0065
>
Land Use
>
#2282 rebuild
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:31:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2021 10:22:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1125
Street Name
North Arm
Street Type
Drive
Address
1125 North Arm Dr
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0711723140065
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> �e�—�--- <br /> �' <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: Au�ust 8, 1997 <br /> Item No.: �' <br /> Department Approval: ^ Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Name: Michael P.Gaffron <br /> �i�iu�� zoning <br /> Title: Senior Planning Coordinator ' <br /> Item Description: #2282 Valerie Petersen, 1125 North Arm Drive - Lot Area/Width Variance- <br /> Procedural Variance <br /> List of Ezhibits: Exhibit A-Memo from Bruce Vang, Field Inspector <br /> Exhibit B -Variance Application Submitted 8/6/97 <br /> Exhibit C - Survey <br /> Exhibit D -Area Plat Map <br /> Please review the attached memo from Bruce Vang. This house was 100%destroyed by a fue. The <br /> Inspections staff conectly concluded that a new house to replace the destroyed house would have <br /> to meet all hardcover and setback requirements. The existing house was only 6'from the north lot <br /> line where 10' is required. <br /> The builder proceeded to design a house to meet all requirements and made application for a <br /> building pernut this week. The survey he submitted with the pemut application showed that the lot <br /> does not meet the minimum area and width standards of the LR-1B district, although it is similaz in <br /> azea and width to other lots in the neighborhood. Unfortunately,this was not identified as an issue <br /> during the City's early discussions with the builder and homeowner. As Bruce's memo notes,the . <br /> house could have been rebuilt in its same substandazd location if it had been only 75%destroyed. <br /> On behalf of the owner,the builder is requesting that the City issue a building permit prior to the <br /> normal variance process, primarily based on the time that will be lost waiting for the variance <br /> process to conclude. A variance application has been submitted and applicant fully intends to go <br /> through the required process, but under the normal schedule this would be scheduled for the . <br /> September 15 Planning Commission meeting and final approval could not be granted by Council <br /> until September 22, hence the builder would lose 6 weeks. <br /> The property owner's insurance company is paying for housing only through December, hence loss <br /> of 6 weeks will create a hazdship for the owner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.