Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> �e�—�--- <br /> �' <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: Au�ust 8, 1997 <br /> Item No.: �' <br /> Department Approval: ^ Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Name: Michael P.Gaffron <br /> �i�iu�� zoning <br /> Title: Senior Planning Coordinator ' <br /> Item Description: #2282 Valerie Petersen, 1125 North Arm Drive - Lot Area/Width Variance- <br /> Procedural Variance <br /> List of Ezhibits: Exhibit A-Memo from Bruce Vang, Field Inspector <br /> Exhibit B -Variance Application Submitted 8/6/97 <br /> Exhibit C - Survey <br /> Exhibit D -Area Plat Map <br /> Please review the attached memo from Bruce Vang. This house was 100%destroyed by a fue. The <br /> Inspections staff conectly concluded that a new house to replace the destroyed house would have <br /> to meet all hardcover and setback requirements. The existing house was only 6'from the north lot <br /> line where 10' is required. <br /> The builder proceeded to design a house to meet all requirements and made application for a <br /> building pernut this week. The survey he submitted with the pemut application showed that the lot <br /> does not meet the minimum area and width standards of the LR-1B district, although it is similaz in <br /> azea and width to other lots in the neighborhood. Unfortunately,this was not identified as an issue <br /> during the City's early discussions with the builder and homeowner. As Bruce's memo notes,the . <br /> house could have been rebuilt in its same substandazd location if it had been only 75%destroyed. <br /> On behalf of the owner,the builder is requesting that the City issue a building permit prior to the <br /> normal variance process, primarily based on the time that will be lost waiting for the variance <br /> process to conclude. A variance application has been submitted and applicant fully intends to go <br /> through the required process, but under the normal schedule this would be scheduled for the . <br /> September 15 Planning Commission meeting and final approval could not be granted by Council <br /> until September 22, hence the builder would lose 6 weeks. <br /> The property owner's insurance company is paying for housing only through December, hence loss <br /> of 6 weeks will create a hazdship for the owner. <br />