Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-00419 - deck replacement CITY OF ORONO 11111111110111111111111111111111111111111 * 20 1 2 - 0 0 4 1 9 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 05/29/2012 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 2697 ETHEL AVE PIN : 20-117-23-24-0045 LEGAL DESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0115 : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY : 434-RESIDENTIAL VALUATION : $ 15,000.00 NOTE: DECK REPLACEMENT APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 265.50 PORTICO PATIO&WINDOW SOLUTIONS PLAN REVIEW 172.58 99 5TH AVE NW#100 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112- STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 7.50 (651)728-0943 TOTAL 445.58 Minnesota State License#:20636992 OWNER COHEN,MARC&IRV 2697 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA,MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revo d at any ime fo ue cause. / Ap!leant erm e Signature Dat Islf ed By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. • a11 I City of Orono V� Building Permit Application for New Structures or Additions >_--- Mailing Address: Permit number: (AQla —6:7°1? PO Box 66 �� Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: ��1��A 11 Received by: ��,A kt,4 :- ,,i; Street Address: \\1... ` o`i% 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee r� �_ 7� Orono, MN 55356 'l k 1-,Yo-.' �'' 5( -,,----<- Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: d1cR1 e_ 1ne.1 Ro-e- Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes , J No If yes,a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: br\co Q0_Iio t u:cndot..JS,koul^S State License# a0co3(4019 .a Expiration Date: 3)2,1I ae13 Phone: (psi-'I 2-5S-09 4-1') (office) (cell) Mailing Address: gel 5i-k. Aue. N� a lOO City: ►Jet,: 13ric‘hf-r;-' ZIP: S-s-It a Contact Person: Chris Ke_}chv l'vl Applicant is: ontracto / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: Chv tsar Rc:,' coim1. tow' PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: - Ct.1f C LoY'Q1'I Phone (day): sI)- '.1% - 9511 /� Address: Zbci1 tt-hc_t Ave- City: 0fc,1b ZIP: SS39I Email and/or Fax ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION: Name: 1 Phone (day): Address: 1►i� P City: ZIP: Email and/or Fax: PROJECT INFORMATION: 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3. Structure Type 4. Sewage Disposal& Water Supply ew Construction Sin le Familywith ❑ Residence Addition attached garage ❑ garage/Accessory Bldg. ❑ Public Sewer ❑Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with eck ❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer ❑Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse ❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water **Any earth movement may require ❑Commercial ❑ Other(specify) MCWD review&permits. ❑ Industrial ❑ Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Other: (specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.orq Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ 15i (cc STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1. Structure Dimensions 1. Structure Dimensions(continued) 2.Type of Construction • a. Length(ft.)= Number of bedrooms= ,Wood/Frame • ❑ Masonry b.Width (ft.)= Number of garage stalls: ❑ Metal Attached= ❑ Pole Bldg. Areas in square feet Detached= ❑ ICF ❑On-site Prefab c. Basement= ❑Off-site Prefab d. 1S'Story - ElOther(please specify): e. 2nd Story= f. 1/2 Story = g.Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable 0 Permit Application ❑ Proposed Building Plans ❑ MN State Energy Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Requirements Form Survey(meeting all requirements) •0 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ Hardcover Calculation(s) ❑ Septic System Site Evaluation Report ❑ Access Permit ❑ Wetland Buffer Improvement Plan ❑ L Engineered Plans for Retaining Walls 4 feet or above ❑ 0 Plan Review Fee ❑ ❑ Other APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. Applicant's Signature: ` Date: 61 ,J l I3'"' Plan Review Checklist 1,- - (\e,hecklist for New Structures / Additions Address/ PID/ Legal: 2-01 �1,- - (\e, �� ( (AIL' L' Description of work: 00--- 4WY Ylw' t \ n— K-( 14) Septic review by: A :$,-(Avci Date Approved: S- 1 0 '( 2— Zoning review by: C) Date Approved: - 25--1 2._ Building review by: 4) Date Approved: 5- Z5-- -i- ____ z S -l- Grading review by: Date Approved: Zoning File#: N A- Resolution#: Nk Resolution Date: Zoning District Fire Department Post Office School District 1---Ic.- Zoning: Lot Area: SF/AC Width: Depth: Survey Submitted: ❑ YesO Date of Survey: • Proposed Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) ( N S E W ) ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland Side Side Building Defined Height: Building Peak Height: #of Stories Ok?: ❑ YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: START WITH the distance between the basement floor/crawl START the distance between the slab and the highest space floor and the highest roof peak, the top of WITH roof peak,the top of the cornice of a flat roof, the cornice of a flat roof,the deck line of a the deck line of a mansard roof, or the mansard roof,or the uppermost point on a round uppermost point on a round or other arch-type or other arch-type roof roof SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window and SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window highest roof peak of a pitched roof and highest roof peak of a pitched roof SUBTRACT the distance between the basement floor/crawl ADD the distance between the slab and the highest space floor and the highest existing grade within existing grade within the foundation the foundation or 10 feet,whichever is less. EQUALS Defined building height EQUALS Defined building height Lot Coverage: SF Shoreland District MCWD Permit Received Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff YYe ❑ ❑ Yes 1:1 No ❑ N/A / ❑ Yes No s 0 No Yes 0 No ./p'N/A Permit Number: Setback: Hardcover Zones Existing Proposed Variance Require CUP Required 0-75' 0 Yes / No 0 Yes o 75-250' Type(s): Type(s): 250-500' 500-1000' REMARKS (in-house): Dec,e t,✓A,5 A pd.-cued 6? vAn.(.4-r/c.a 47'lo2 c.J �c,c( / !72 NA/4.406c_ 1,0A-5 �IL A 3 ' aA-� c c4. - 6-c cc. L ..,4s ,gJ , ( v�[T- Z ' Updated: 09/11/2009 r/- -- & r- L.,( n '- �1.: y (4 c.-,P p/1-.on.7C- /I/w3 9- /Y`A.1-4' 3 i 5_,2.4-1340 z:\forms\plan review checklist.docx Fees to be Charged YES_ NO Permit bV Plan Review !� State Surcharge Investigation Fee SAC— Number of SAC Units Sewer Connection Water Connection Park Fee Site Inspection Other(specify) Miscellaneous Fees Calculated By: Square Footage $ per Square Footage Basement X = $ 1St Floor X = $ 2nd Floor X = $ Garage X = $ Estimated Construction Value: $ )S1 0()0 "`. Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits ❑ Site ❑ Plumbing ❑ Grading / Filling 0 Well O Hardcover Removal 0 Mechanical 0 Fire 0 Electrical ,00ting 0 Septic 0 Water Connection O Poured Wall 0 Fireplace 0 Sewer Connection O Foundation Survey 0 Masonry 0 Lawn Irrigation O Radon Rock Bed 0 Mfg. ,12tFraming 0 Other(specify) ❑ Insulation ❑ 9.s-Built Survey Final O Other(specify) REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: _ Date Approved: Access:Existing: 0 YES 0 NO New: 0 YES 0 NO REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED BY PERSON PULLING PERMIT) Updated: 09/11/2009 z:\forms\plan review checklist.docx Al _..x^ "`' y 5� '', _ v. ^i '' - - i , proven7 :,.i.. ./ : , , � Fas and �ff��� �t Performance „ , ... . . „ , „ ,„„._.,„ „ ,..., , ,. ,,,, ... „ . _,.._ tnstal�ati®n .. Over 15 Years of Installations...No Call Backs! Testimonials • Fast Installation You can Frame Immediately DiamondPier • High Strength 3 North Wind reconstructed a boardwalk destroyed by • Save an Inspection Call it in Later p pS0 Reinforced Concrete Hurricane Ivan,at Hurlburt Field Air Force Base.Two p months later,the tidal surge from Hurricane Dennis • Proven TechnologyHigh TechnologyHead meets or r submerged the boardwalk,and it was repeatedly Foundations standarexceedds CI 318 rammed by a 26'sailboat in 100 mph winds.Then Field Tested Over 15 Years Worldwide -i Katrina struck...The boardwalk maintained its level N 1 *Galvanized Pins and sturdiness,and not a single Diamond Pier was `" • Low Environmental " ;, g .. {` meet or exceed compromised....the Diamond Piers acted as a major ?_ Impact ASTM standards stabilizing factor. '4,4' * % , , 4 • Easy to Install '' •r /` •Hi h Impact Taj Goodpaster-Project Manager.North Wind,Ince r41 i g p ,, ., ,i ! / Inspection Plugs D&C Construction built a 1500 ft b 12 ft wetland ` • Repositionable t y ��APin Caps install boardwalk for the Metropolitan District Commission of Remove Pins with w ''�; Massachusetts winter of 2004.The followingspring, n / 41 L: after inspection p g Pipe Wrench Y, E_ �� •Pre-Cast 1/2" -too year floods rose over the boardwalk.Inspecting ;- �> I the work after another sever winter a year later,the • Lifetime Warranty ' Galvanized Anchor Diamond Piers remain precisely in place with no y = • �t J j', Bolt to secure movement.This product truly lives up to expectations - Parts and Labor b. } j standard post and is without a doubt the foundation of the future. ° i brackets James Morris-Director of Operations,D&C Construction v.iz US Patents 5 039 256 6 910 832 7 326,003 $ a;,� i ,...'.� For all applications refer to p Timberform constructed 3 boardwalks in National GreenSpec• the manufacturers complete LISTED Parks in Hokkaido.Top rails of handrails and all installation guidelines planking have kept perfectly level.There is no damage , Load Bearing Capacity Comparison M= <mm from frost heave.Diamond Piers have not moved Soil Pier Types -I', Pin Driving Bit and the whole structure is perfectly sound. v Types* 18"Round 16"Square DP50 % "" for use with most impact hammers Eiji Maeno -Timberform Japan Co,Ltd i...,.-,;f:f'-_-_=,-. 1.77 sf 1.78 sf 1.8 sf equivalent bearing 1 that accept an 1-1/8"hex shaft Diamond Piers have been used on projects throughout i' w 2000 psf 3540 lbs. 3560 lbs. 3600 lbs. Sands Commercial Grade Piers also available: Chicago since 1996.To date there have been no ' _ t j owner or buildingofficial 1500 psf i DP75 and DP100 c- 2655 lbs. 2670 lbs. 2700 lbs. Silts/Clays complaints regarding g;` 1 settlement or movement due L. „t - I, IRC 2006/2009,Table R401.4.1 i _ to frost heave.The system ,;:e.:!, .- _--, ' 4 provides an equivalent, ,',.. • r'_, '..17 ° i About the Company Founder durable and safe alternative _ + to typical concrete piers. i CO (dial marsh. ir Rick Gagliano developed the first Steven Michels 0 , pinned foundation system in 1984 Structural Engineer '** '�I. COMPLIANT ''. After completing his arfor an installation in a chitectural ural State of Illinois i', thesis study on rigid pile clusters, 441 } The Diamond Pier DP50 is recognized by the Rick founded Pin Foundations,Inc. International Code Council (ICC) for residential in 1992.with 7 patents supporting w i1. applications.The report (ESR-1895) and test theuniquely technology,the Diamonde i Pier - i- - - - - --- � - is a uniquely durable,versatile and ,, - ( - _ - - - iresults are available on our website at... environmentally friendly approach - ; ;--_ to construction. HIGH TECHNOLOGY '' wwDiamondPiers.com/ESR w. FOUNDATIONS i' M / • www.diamondpiers.cor � Diamond 253 858-8809 p \Ch Pier' 858-8607 f • Local Building Official Report Review Assistance—ESR Report .1.895, DP-50 Diamond Piers" We appreciate your taking the time in your schedule to review this newly recognized foundatic product for residential porches,decks. walkways and stairs. The Diamond Pier foundation has been u successfully for public works projects across the country since 1996. The DP-50 model,geared specifically for residential use,has many environmental advantages for the homeowner, and many scheduling and time advantages for the deck builder. The packet has been presented to you by a curre or future permit applicant to make sure you concur with the Evaluation Service's thorough review of t product under the code requirements of the RRC. The simple intention of the tent criteria devised by the Code Council to evaluate the Diamond i centers on the table for generic soil bearing values (IRC Table R401.4.1), which may he used"in lieu complete geotechnical evaluation" fol.your local soil conditions,just as you would for any convention deck. As you can see from the excerpt page of the Third Party Test Report, the load tests conducted o the piers, were done in soils with strengths matching the two lowest bearing categories of this table: 1: psf silts and clays, and 2000 psf sands and gravels. These tests confirmed that the DP-50 system perfo just like an ordinary, flat bottom, pad or cylinder footing,having a bearing area of 1.8 square feet. (Section 4.1 oftlw ESR Report) This capacity is equivalent to an 18"cylinder or 16" square concrete Footing. We know the Diamond Pies looks uique, and that it would seem to involve complicated Pile theory to analyze its performance. file reality though is that with very short stiffpiles, locked in the concrete head,the entire system pushes against the soil as one uit,gaining bearing strength from the engaged beneath the rigid, 4-way Pin frame. This Pin frame not only does all the bearing work, but it's deep spread configuration also ft:nctions like a bell shaped footing, providing an alternate to conventional heave protection,resisting fi rees of frost or expansive material. while upper soils cleave around and past the bottom of the diamc shaped head. In these soil zones, as indicated in the Manufacturer's Instructions,Pin length is based o providing sufficient resistance to heave pressures rather than reaching a specific vertical depth. With these features, the Diamond Pier can be used for porches, decks, or stairways attached to primary dwelling (Section 5.3 of the l.S'R Report). and can he inspected at any time during construction check for proper Pin length, and the installation of level, intact piers. if you have any questions about this report,please call David Pereg or Nick Stoklia at the ICC. 1-562-699-0543. extensions 3275 & 3283 respectively, or call Pin Foundations at 1-253-858-3844. Thank you. I'iN FOUNDATIONS INC 8607 58ih Ave NW Gig 1/arbor WA 98332 / .shipping: 2105 34''Ave NW Unit 30 Gig Harbw; WA / DAT TIME V CITY OF ORONO 'CALLED IN 7-/1 INSPECTION NOTICE vvv SCHEDULED 7-12 -/2 - PERMIT NO. 020/02 -oG(fi 9 COMPLETED ADDRESS c 9 7 -Q 41-)-e- OWNER -c -e.OWNER TELEPHONE NO.651 728 ° 7g3 CONTRACTOR Per,-n LO DESCRIPTION F'' /Ili -4 r/Ka-L Oe�y k. u CIFOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING 4. Q 0 POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z 0 INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP 0 PROGRESS ❑ FINAL 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. 0 FOLLOW-UP :El_ CI DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC INSTALL CI HARD COVER REMOVAL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO o COMMENTS: CC W Q. CC J .k.T/a 1 tb Q(_C 0 W Q /t5ii IA 4-&OA) --A. �12ee---40/0 r® r 020/61-(no 5 S c\i/ ,- I © W w cc • 4?"VQRK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ROJECT COMPLETE CC W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED El ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 9 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY t j BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice • ... H ..1.... ,, \ Nq, ' ' . , . ... . _ •,-. N. - .;-.A. ''''''' -... ,. '‘-•.% . IV+•••• ..' e'- '''', -- -•,.N.' ' .' , . . , ' .7'''''''`*AIWA -.• . ... r-'elr• •• - i ' 4,'-•,1••••7"tf•NI '.• -1 *,11., - - , :•,-0.jk .'. . , r —,-------- , •- 1 r:,t''''It.,..•.i..1,; 1 •''''`i. : !,P1 ,kiek. ..s.,V,•••;• l •„ ..*-- - '''44'40!::..--`• 41 2]. il:,d, . . k 14 .1t i-, ' :',". . "•:, . T):, il . . V". -- 7I' ,• 1•• 1•,,, '-- , ' ,! _as ) r, -, , ...., •,..,, ,,, . .„ „ , •, •„•,.......„, „. , - ,. .,_„,....,.... • , -,,•- •. ....,....•-i t. 4 . _-, ,,4......A. , . ,... ,..i ..„ 4,,..•-,7,- ,: ,. - Nito ' I 1 . •,1,..3.- I \•\''- 1 ...\00,. ,...." ,.-..._ , . . . _ . . •0,., •-•...,, „, t - • . .,,.0%, • /- r.-.-7..: ----1 b 4 .,.& .:, -1-4 .- , ______. . ' nom, 1 \ 2,.. 1 11 11 ii -.AI iii PP0,- '•' 41- -"\ )\ • - amillic '' ...--- ii 2-911_•••,:z-v w snow ' a •- .. ..-- ..,:i • . ! k alit •.•_. „ •--- - . .-,' 'r ..:,-..:, ,,!;•" ., z.j.k.0.. i • ; ..,. . • I II , , ! . _ ___ 1•:::.41 . 0, :1 , . .,...,. ..,---- :,-,;-.T ii4.. .,:'; • I ,• • i:: ' --'''... _------ , , ' ...,,..,".:ei.',' • " ' 'kV 4-, 1,..'-:.: -,:, 7..fi4:i''.. '•' 0 ..---- .--- . --1,', • .,, .4:...,,i . . iiii„•k; II - . - . _..,. --, .. . ' .4,.. ... ' . '.. '• • . _ . ,,