Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015 - MN wetland Cons. Act
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Carson&Karolien Glad 625 Ferndale Rd N,Orono Application Number 3/24/15 W15-13 Type of Application(check all that apply): ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Summary and description of proposed project(attach additional sheets as necessary): Carson&Karolien Glad have applied for wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 625 Ferndale Road North in the City of Orono(Hennepin County PID 3611823110021, S36, T118N,R23W). Legal description: Section 36,Township 118N,Range 23W. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. on November 13, 2014. A complete delineation report and application was submitted to MCWD on March 24, 2015.Two wetlands were delineated on site. The boundaries will be reviewed in the field by MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255,Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Beth Brown business-day comment period): Permitting Technician 5/15/2015(4:30PM) Address(if different than LGU) Date,time,and location of decision: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following the review Minnetonka,MN 55345 of the application and completion of the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952)641-4504 ® Staff ebrown@minnehahacreek.org ❑ Governing Board or Council gn.Oti Signature: Date: 4/14/15 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 . 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES • SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski- stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us • BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer-ben.meyer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): • DNR TEP member: Brooke Haworth-brooke.haworth@state.mn.us ❑ DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): • Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Carson& Karolien Glad- glad@cargill.com • Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Consultant-Andrew Krinke-andrew@kjolhaugenv.com City of Orono—Christine Mattson-cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny—melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/contact/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidji,MN 56601 Grand Rapids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions,see:http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.anny.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul,MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 5.ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application,list any other attachments: ® Complete delineation report ❑ ❑ BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 Project Name and/or Number: 625 Ferndale Road PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity,partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Carson&Karolien Glad Mailing Address: 625 Ferndale Road North Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: (763)-221-4114 E-mail Address: Glad@cargill.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Andrew Krinke Mailing Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone: (952)-401-8757 E-mail Address: Andrew@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 625 Ferndale Road N(3611823110021) Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): S36 T118N R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 4.0 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland,lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 625 Ferndale Road PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact' Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. __ Type of Impact Duration of County,Major Aquatic Existing Plant Aquatic Resource (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Size of Watershed#, ID(as noted on Resource Type Community drain,or Permanent(P) Size of Impact' Aquatic and Bank (wetland,lake, remove or Temporary Resource 3 Type(s)in overhead view) Service Area# tributary etc.) Impact Area° vegetation) (T)' of Impact Areas . 'If impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". 'Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". 'Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3'd Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. sRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature p Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: O '"� Date: 372. ...// I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 625 Ferndale Road Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU)provide me with the following(check all that apply): ®Wetland Type Confirmation ® Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring,not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). ® Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Delineation.IDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 625 Ferndale Road North Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Lecy Construction by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2014-241) March 5, 2015 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 625 Ferndale Road North site was inspected on November 13, 2014 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI map showed a PUBG wetland within site boundaries. • The soil survey showed Dundas-Cordova as the hydric soils present within site boundaries. • The DNR Protected Waters map showed no DNR Protected Waters, Waterways or Wetlands within the site boundaries. However, two DNR Protected Waters (Hadley 27- 109P and Lydiard 27-159P)were located near the site. • Two (2) wetlands were delineated within site boundaries as summarized below Wetland Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Wetland ID Type Classification Classification Dominant Vegetation reed canary grass, 1 Type 5 PUBG shallow, open water community cattail green ash, reed canary 2 Type 1 PEMA seasonally flooded basin grass I 625 Ferndale Road North Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The 625 Ferndale Road North site was examined on November 13, 2014 for the presence and extent of wetland. The 4.0-acre site was located in Section 36, Township 118N, Range 23W, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Generally the site was located south of Lydridard Road and west of Ferndale Road North(Figure 1). Site limits were comprised of Hennepin County PID 3611823110021. The site consisted primarily of a single-family residential lot dominated by mowed Kentucky bluegrass and planted conifer(red pine &white spruce) and deciduous (green ash and boxelder) trees (Figure 2). One (1)wetland was located in the north area of the site in a depressional area dominated by reed canary grass. An open water pond was located along the southern boundary of the project area. Generally topography was highest on the north half of the site and sloped gradually downhill toward the south. Adjacent to the site were single-family residential homes on large lots. II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Determination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual(Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest (Version 2.0) as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetlands, which met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags and were located by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveying IncCraig, I have a couple things attached in the email. First is the wetland delineation report for your review. I also attached a page of the WCA Application that needs to be signed and dated by the client.Can you send me a scanned copy of the page and the contact information of the client(mailing address,email and phone number)? Thanks, Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal 2 coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 18-20 inches (unless otherwise noted) utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are from the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Version 7, 2010) which are commonly found in the Midwest. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2014 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, J.T. 2009. North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, and BONAP, Chapel Hill,NC.). III. RESULTS Review of NWI, and DNR Information The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Excelsior Quadrangle, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1991) showed a PUBG wetland within site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/) showed the following soil types within or near site boundaries (Figure 4). • SMU Map Unit Name Acres Percentage Hydric Percentage Hydric Category in AOI of AOI of Map Unit L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, 2 3 58.6% 2 Predominantly moderately eroded Non-Hydric L22D2 Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent 0.04 0.9% 0 Non-Hydric slopes, moderately eroded L44A Nesse! loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 0.3 7.1% 10 Predominantly Non-Hydric L45A Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 1.1 27.9% 30 Predominantly percent slopes Non-Hydric The DNR Protected Waters Map,Hennepin County(http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/) showed no DNR Protected Waters, Waterways or Wetlands within site boundaries (Figure 5). However, two DNR Protected Waters (Hadley 27-109P and Lydiard 27-159P) were located within 1000 feet east and west of the site, respectively. Wetland Determinations and Delineations 3 Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on November 13, 2014. Two (2) wetlands were identified and delineated on the subject site (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that date, herbaceous vegetation was actively growing and hydrologic conditions were assumed to be typical for that date based on available precipitation data (Appendix B) and field observations. A survey of the wetland boundaries is included as Appendix C. Wetland 1 was a Type 5 (PUBG) shallow, open water wetland with a saturated fringe dominated by reed canary grass with lesser amounts of cattail. Adjacent upland was a single-family residential lot dominated by mowed Kentucky bluegrass and planted red pine trees. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation composition and topography. Wetland 1 corresponded to a PUBG wetland on the NWI map, but was located in an area mapped as hydric soil (Dundas-Cordova) on the soil survey. Wetland 2 was a Type 1 (PEMA) seasonally flooded wetland dominated by reed canary grass and green ash trees. No inundation or soil saturation was observed within the wetland or at the sample point. Adjacent upland was a single-residential lot dominated by mowed Kentucky bluegrass and planted trees. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation composition and topography. Wetland 2 did not correspond to a wetland on the NWI map, but was located in an area mapped as hydric soil (Dundas-Cordova) on the soil survey. Other Areas An area located in the middle of the site was mapped as wetland according to the MCWD (Figure 6). The area was dominated by mowed Kentucky bluegrass and mature red pine, sugar maple, and white spruce trees. Do to the absence of hydrophytic vegetation KES determined this area to be non-wetland. Another area of interest was located east of the home on the site. This area was a depressional landscape feature lined with landscape rock and rip rap and dominated by Canada thistle and planted with yew shrubs and white spruce saplings. Do to the absence of hydrophytic vegetation KES determined this area to be non-wetland. No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown with hydric soil on the soil survey map, or as wetland on the NWI map. 4 V. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 Andrew Krinke, Ecologist/GIS Specialist Report Prepared by: Andrew Krinke, Ecologist/GIS Specialist .t, Report reviewed by: Date: March 5, 2015 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 5 625 Ferndale Road North Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure 1 —Site Location Map • Figure 2—Aerial Photograph • Figure 3 —NWI Map • Figure 4— Soil Survey Map • Figure 5 —DNR Protected Waters Map • Figure 6—MCWD Management Classification Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an 5rr,, official survey product. y,t5 C,„ay Road6 N p e 12th Averuc Neth Site Location 11th A .914-4 L 404 9th Ave"— '11414-41* ��_�.��{ �ia:„ # . s + a h s ©OpenStreetMap(and)contributors,CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map 625 Ferndale Road (KES 2014-241) 7 . 0 0.125 0.25 Orono, Minnesota T >� Miles — l JOLT t UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A •� / '" ' / V : *4 , ''• _ Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure L. "' ,` , ,+ . ;. are approximate and do not constitute an ., . .' , R 1030 • 11111 ` official survey product. 0- . -<., , �>.. .�.. 20' _ J, 46* �• ill Ill t , *. .'. ` '1!►tr ., h. 11. 444-Wetland 2 A .. ''' �- ... ' *t' ,' ` gip, / ar#'0, ♦.r _ L -. �. r' 7 , op 7 il. ..,, . 17 •* •A 1 .f * JVr7` #� :fir, 'i- ffik, '..1.0,.',.,4.• /Wu gt +, r t1111“,..,,-,,, * „ .tib ' * c4 * * , G y t 411 '1 , JP - •.. + . '0 4 4 +A1 � �, I , -i,v. • 14 .,.*....„- pi,. ... ..; tip+ „ �... e y _ y jot 0. • ar ,r ,,gyp. *, {- ° w /071000 ~ , , -Irr''i : . �rift ;,,� s ' . ,' ,.,%Wetland 1 , kI 7/., Pr . )' , s 1p 10ft Lidar Contours ',,• Transect t: ,14, N Wetland Boundary „ 'i Figure 2 - Property Boundary Map (2013 FSA Photograph) 625 Ferndale Road (KES 2014-241) ,:.„°Y 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota v ` Feet `'' i N �(' T u�TT _ � 1 JOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A . . • .; `w'- '4.': :, -.� 1.. r , w ,. Note:Boundaries indicated on this figure • 4-- '•' . ' �• , <` ` are approximate and do not constitute an ;� '•43 ,* '1* . t'* •, 4% 4114161410- official survey product. ' y y! ' r ,.. , • ';'...,.c-'4.a r' ••, a - r ' f,• ;,v. ,d,i. • sir' . -'6'' ''' iitil. ‘4 4:"4it4. '1. '' -4' 4;.*!**iviiiiiir'''''' '''' 1 : -0 it 440' ' „ 4.4c ,i' . • 0 • / • • % T 'Ss 1' :.t• ,Mt 4- .. " >. s r + y ` • r •lt I J.,t*, w • � - ,..- ' ir,,, „;c., • .,._" : ii,00%..,,,i) "'.. . :0,' . . *. ' . #fre ''', ,k rt,' ,... Ai ' 47'. ',,-. - . — 4;- PEM1A +�" * b - ;� . • ' -` ,q i . ... r, .lir .... , 4 , „ri,,,v.: , , . ... ,r, , .. : . , i 4, , ,,,,e.4; . ,- %R.eo, , s . '" , , ,•• 1 P.UBG � . s •r •. � '44 ..., tit k Figure 3 - NWI Map (2013 MN DNR) 625 Ferndale (KES No. 2014-241) \,` 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota _.. Feet N ! - KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A oft Nit-i, -: .......vor,7, -, r „fit - _, ,.., :. ..,...,„, . * <.J •► , -. Aa Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure -. ''..t.; r'- '. . 1 ', 41146 IIEE are approximate and do not constitute an ' t 5 :, .;k• a official survey product. pd it "r..� Li Atilt 117$7 `$C .• = , , ..., .,„, ,,,e....,-/ ' v,*- - 416,4,.. '. '41* ';'i ii i/0. 4,4W er 0'Y-*0:4 .wr * + 4 - ..-..." 'Ply -- ." ., pr,alr,• ' i r • ':4km,.. AI Ile e / i re f if:A;14,,e,, , ,, tr'MP. : ,,; "6„, 'or t aa se ;0001 '''' r If,raj 4:1; ir Pit 1-e",-iffier . `--- 4 -' ' , / , ' rP •t, , , //// I: I 4/..• ''''/,,t,..,.44,4*.. ), , , )4 '1.'4 , ye 4, ., . ftr'1'.''-_,e'''Cr':-41.:#•*F14'',,Alr -'. ' 7 : -4' " If .. .- 4/Pr r.4;*.4 'It f '4$ ,, * . or ,,,,,.., ,,,,, 0 ,,,,,,, -4- t--. i ;dr .,,tf- - t ..., .,,, , 4 ' 4 ' '/r �.' * . X1 fi i r ,,m," v." 4 ' : 4 ' M < J -1;. ' a L22C2' -41/4,12 iCfR N 11 a f ' Ali: A..,‘0. *.*K...11,41 - 1111 0*1 r '. S ' I _Q `i, � ii, .� n ' a irst # "i' -7- .'' ,. 1 : , ., ja fl ` ,` 44;* R . om r • 1 / (eort:/i.--Ayel.:- l' ,4- .*:',0-ri„,,,,.#7.41,,, --°k:7,,;;._ ' -- . , r ....t. .. -.". . A.::d":":4,-..14.' 7, ' ,, . .-. ., erif a. .�i ice. „ +moi . .w.: 6. 'r'• Map Unit Map Unit Name Slope (%) It, , L22C2 Lester loam, moderately eroded 6to 10 Non Hydric Soils L22D2 Lester loam, moderately eroded 10 to 16 L44A Nessel loam 1to3 Hydric Soils • } L45A Dundas Cordova complex Oto 3 x Figure 4 - Soil Survey Map 625 Ferndale Road (KES No. 2014-241) 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota _•� Feet N t � - 1lJOLI-IA G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A vOlamowv . . iv. -. i . Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an • 4"1. A official survey product. • . n.. -4 hos,„ 4 Ifyit 5,-,,, i. .,- -, ,...,........ . ... , h �r f ♦ Kay. • t ' IV/. s ' ). ' . 4, s 1..: *3,a , Vi. la: . '',' , ... ,.,, „,, „ , „ , „. ,► - • t 4440.400 4 6 . ,4.,f„.. ,,,,,, .. # '„ ” -1„.at a,- t. ill'„,.....#. 4„,:y: x ktir h. ,.._�.._ . :, i - '; .. 1 Ii 'ilii l- ` ',,-.4a,,' s •fit � Lydiard;(27-159,P) ;1„,i',' . .. . ' it* ' :404410* ' 91%: ilk ' f "` � �" HadleyY(27-109 P) y .rr - 4 4 is v' .-1 . s. ... �"w ° * tp ; • J ;'+ 14 t '� Fes,,"g,,� a; � ��_^ e p4 .41 46. 14144FT .;1' ,it re- II, - . ...,, , , ,,,, ,,,..„ .,%,... ., ),„..i..,.„, 4.le,,, .-,„. '4 ' r ''.$4 -, 7.1 I e 4? ' . ‘ .i '7 4 ,rditiso. 44 . ' ti.4 -, . t.Iti :**.- r ' .. 4.. Protected Waterways ,h„ 'K, .. - PI rProtected Waters r N _ . „ _ Figure 5 - DNR Protected Waters Map 625 Ferndale Road (KES No. 2014-241) . 'Y0 0.125 0.25 Orono, Minnesota t, ,t j(' T u� Miles N � - 1 IJoui4 UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A k; , ffi t Wit:( • r . . _.�_ s,¢itr . l Note:Boundaries indicated on this figure _ !• ( � % -" • °.t are approximate and do not constitute an t. ` .' " � 1' ',4-.',4,-.0`.. r..-- , • a, r ' " official survey product. f .P°"".A M r ' ^ { it . Al �, 0 ,.- •,.• -'�' ._ ?.5 1' 0 la A 1,401 • "'• ' + i -4. '0"-`1. ,' s •t ` i, kj .` +rte "Y ! v. ' -si, .-,,, .m. '-.tit 4:4* n 4Ft 4 Y 4 10, ,..' ,, P4 111 A V i is i , r d �... V *, c;-.,--,,-, t er .„.. . , , . , ,1 . i� . ir. „it:4. . , . ,„ ,.. .., , ,, ,,,... , , ,,r .. . ire « C +' Jam. } • a y�� 1: 4.i i:31 9. i• i f i}<• { e 4 it • • p.N...'fit ::*. r. rr r� .:"*"4 * e� p a_ k .i , p `r! , . 'i •O.. • rte' ..x: - ... �,R , 4 , ti. . *r d " r. r A# ,!11 r 'l -P� t � 11 4 i' - '.� •� . *�°"" ".„.04% • r Manage 2 Not Classified .'`. �. it; Figure 6 - MCWD Management Classification 625 Ferndale (KES No. 2014-241) �1 Ys 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota / Feet 1 N ` L. KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A 625 Ferndale Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 625 Ferndale Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/13/2014 Applicant/Owner: Lecy Brother Const. State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125)AK Section,Township, Range: Sec.36,T118N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex, none): Linear slope Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Dundas-Cordova complex VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions dry based on the 30-day rolling average. Point taken in upland on slope leading down to wetland. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus resinosa 10 Y FACU that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 75.00% (A/B) 20 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 90 x 3= 270 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 130 (A) 390 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00 2 Cirsium arvense 10 N FACU 3 Phalaris arundinacea 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 4-10 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 5/1 10 D M Loam 10-14 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 5/1 10 D M Sandy Loam 14-24 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol(A1) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) _Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) _2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: Top 14" likely excavated material from pond placed on native topsoil at this location. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High_ ter Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) —Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) -Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 21 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 625 Ferndale Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/13/2014 Applicant/Owner: Lecy Brother Const. State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125)AK Section,Township, Range: Sec. 36,T118N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Dundas-Cordova complex VWI Classification: PUBG Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions dry based on the 30-day rolling average. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 110 (A) 210 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.91 2 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL 3 Urtica dioica 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Persicaria pensylvanica 10 N FACW _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 110 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Clay loam 8-12 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay loam 12-30 10YR 2/1 100 Clay loam 30-36 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) _-Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) _-2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) `High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _-Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) -Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site 625 Ferndale Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/13/2014 Applicant/Owner: Lecy Brother Const. State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125)AK Section,Township, Range: Sec. 36,T118N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): None Slope(%): 1 to 3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Glencoe(Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions dry based on the 30-day rolling average. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Celtis occidentalis 15 Y FAC that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (A/B) 30 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhus typhina 20 Y UPL Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 55 x 2= 110 4 FAC species 15 x 3= 45 5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40 20 =Total Cover UPL species 20 x 5= 100 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 110 (A) 305 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 25 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.77 2 Frangula alnus 15 Y FACW 3 Carex pedunculata 10 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Solidago canadensis 10 N FACU _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 60 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-15 10YR 3/2 100 Loam 15-30 10YR 3/4 100 Loam *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) -Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(89) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 625 Ferndale Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/13/2014 Applicant/Owner: Lecy Brother Const. State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125)AK Section,Township, Range: Sec. 36,T118N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 2 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Dundas-Cordova complex VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions dry based on the 30-day rolling average. Point taken in upland on slope leading down to wetland. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 15 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 75 x 2= 150 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40 20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 95 (A) 200 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 25 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.11 2 Frangula alnus 15 Y FACW 3 Carex pedunculate 10 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Solidago canadensis 10 N FACU _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 60 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/2 100 Loam 8-17 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam 10YR 5/1 5 D M 17-30 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay Loam 10YR 5/1 5 D M *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) _Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) — Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) —High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) _-Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) -Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) _-Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 625 Ferndale Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Data 625 Ferndale Road, Orono: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals : 2014 Target: T118N R23W 536 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn 00000000 pre Jan 2014 27 118N 23w 2 WSD .99 Feb 2014 27 118N 23w 2 WSD .96 Mar 2014 27 117N 23W 26 WSD .51 Apr 2014 27 117N 23w 24 MOSQ DEEPHAVE 7.81 May 2014 27 118N 22w 17 SWCD 4.95 Jun 2014 27 118N 22w 17 SWCD 11.80 Jul 2014 27 118N 22w 17 SWCD 3.77 Aug 2014 27 118N 22w 17 SWCD 2.90 Sep 2014 27 118N 22w 17 SWCD 2.02 Oct 2014 27 118N 23w 20 MOSQ MEDINA .60 NOV 2014 27 118N 23w 20 MOSQ MEDINA .20 March/April/May Daily Records Date Precip. Date Precip. Date Precip. Sep 1, 2014 .75 Oct 1, 2014 - Nov 1, 2014 - Sep 2, 2014 T Oct 2, 2014 .30 Nov 2, 2014 - Sep 3, 2014 0 Oct 3, 2014 .20 Nov 3, 2014 - Sep 4, 2014 .28 oct 4, 2014 - Nov 4, 2014 - Sep 5, 2014 0 Oct 5, 2014 - Nov 5, 2014 - Sep 6, 2014 0 oct 6, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014 .20 Sep 7, 2014 0 Oct 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 - Sep 8, 2014 0 Oct 8, 2014 - Nov 8, 2014 - Sep 9, 2014 0 Oct 9, 2014 - Nov 9, 2014 - Sep 10, 2014 .21 Oct 10, 2014 - Nov 10, 2014 - Sep 11, 2014 .11 oct 11, 2014 - Nov 11, 2014 - Sep 12, 2014 0 Oct 12, 2014 - Nov 12, 2014 - Sep 13, 2014 0 Oct 13, 2014 - Nov 13, 2014 - site visit Sep 14, 2014 0 Oct 14, 2014 .10 Nov 14, 2014 - Sep 15, 2014 .10 Oct 15, 2014 - Nov 15, 2014 - sep 16, 2014 0 Oct 16, 2014 - Nov 16, 2014 - Sep 17, 2014 0 Oct 17, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 - Sep 18, 2014 0 Oct 18, 2014 - Nov 18, 2014 - Sep 19, 2014 0 Oct 19, 2014 - Nov 19, 2014 - Sep 20, 2014 0 Oct 20, 2014 - Nov 20, 2014 - Sep 21, 2014 .42 Oct 21, 2014 - Nov 21, 2014 - Sep 22, 2014 0 Oct 22, 2014 - Nov 22, 2014 - Sep 23, 2014 0 Oct 23, 2014 - Nov 23, 2014 - Sep 24, 2014 .02 Oct 24, 2014 - Nov 24, 2014 - Sep 25, 2014 .03 Oct 25, 2014 - Nov 25, 2014 - Sep 26, 2014 0 oct 26, 2014 - Nov 26, 2014 - sep 27, 2014 0 Oct 27, 2014 - Nov 27, 2014 - Sep 28, 2014 0 Oct 28, 2014 - Nov 28, 2014 - Sep 29, 2014 0 Oct 29, 2014 - Nov 29, 2014 - Sep 30, 2014 .10 Oct 30, 2014 - NOV 30, 2014 - oct 31, 2014 - 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.52 0.40 1.25 1.91 2.66 3.19 2.57 3.01 2.47 1.29 1.04 0.67 16.67 27.56 26.37 70% 1.05 0.90 1.97 2.67 4.13 5.29 4.21 4.83 3.95 3.29 1.89 1.44 21.51 33.73 34.47 mean 0.84 0.83 1.78 2.56 3.51 4.36 4.07 4.15 3.42 2.39 1.71 1.17 19.51 30.78 30.60 10 Site Visit Climate Conditions g 625 Ferndale Road, Orono N a) S c° 8 C C 0 7 2 30 - day rolling •Q total 'v 6 a) ti. To 5 O s 4 C O E 3 -• C normal ca �, 2 precip range Fs 1 - 9/11/14 9/26/14 10/11/14 10/26/14 11/10/14 o monthly precip — daily precip 30d rolling total 625 Ferndale Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C: Wetland Boundary Survey t3 1 V V / / VI` Q) Err tql \C1' 9 B / 7QTOC pBT / / 7:• BT 02-26 BT . BTOC Tab 26'A•li / 1 DEEND / BRC/EBT BT -G'- e ..0 c .BT 9`. - :Nr : 3.5E3.5W Z R i o �GARAGE. .1 :LDREHD „ IRM44 ; • e:9 I, ►::�.P18 � B_ a _ '�' Je's, . 48.2 '�,.��o MA i -20 T L 1 213 �`7a K r./1Raca � R mg=.5�� OW � 0 QTR DC 44.14241 E C (40 a! EXISTING boulder wn//a eiii HOUSE n� rrh 21D' �o'Ikpb �.-arRI it •5 14812.5 c TOO 2 1 0 o I.9 W480101.5 BtiROH/POR -i 1(3 K o �y pm',IBS JO'114719 *"1 JOti 1L4 12/8/8/8 t • - �� B[TC BD7C / ,T B't1-J?'a drPlC 1. w•. .4 C �..:.N ,,:..5 mi BCC/4.0 ECK Z. •0• • Ndl P2 4 os PEAr :0�:1.. • ;.o \ V. APIC /� 1 NAIL Z �IC 16'4„,„,, (jai v iii.C., 2 01(01 J wtca,a (0e Poo/ Oen e 0 QP)• b REND '� . T --* . V 16' J4 sty= / / 1o10 / Z 1' '1' ii le. __ _ P 32 '�* / // ' delineate 2 / �� <51 / / r _4 it ia3 cs'k. WL 1-4 WL 1-5 �' Z / -g 10p2 / WWL1- POND WL 1-8 .-i1,1- / ,�o a line parallel with eine A. o0.-N ,o, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55391 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Carson & Karolien Glad 625 Ferndale Rd N, Orono Application Number 3/24/15 W15-13 ® Attach site locator map Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss [' Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ❑ Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary(or attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: ® Approved ❑Approved with conditions(include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): Carson&Karolien Glad have applied for wetland boundary&type approval for the wetlands located at 625 Ferndale Road N in the City of Orono(Hennepin County PID 3611823110021, S36,Ti 18N, R23W). Legal description: Section 36,Township 118N,Range 23W. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. on November 13,2014.A complete delineation report and application was submitted to MCWD on March 24, 2015. Two wetlands were delineated on site. Wetland 1 was classified as a Type 5 shallow, open water wetland and Wetland 2 was classified as a Type 1 seasonally-flooded basin. MCWD reviewed the boundaries in the field on April 21,2015. MCWD was in agreement with the boundaries of the wetlands on site and approves the wetland boundaries and types as delineated in the field and documented in the delineation report.This decision is valid for five years.A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ['Financial Assurance:For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ['Deed Recording:For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Beth Brown Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail ��Lam` E>tioc� 5/21/15 (952)641-4504 ebrown@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal,the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and$0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55391 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.meyer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ❑ DNR TEP member: ® DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Brooke Haworth- brooke.haworth@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Carson&Karolien Glad— carson_glad@cargill.com ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Andrew Krinke(Kjolhaug Environmental Services)—andrew@kjolhaugenv.com,Christine Mattson(City of Orono)— cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny— melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION >For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf >For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Hwy.2 Div.Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions,see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.anny.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St.Paul,MN 55101-1678 >For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul,MN 55155 6.ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map,list any other attachments: ®Approved wetland boundaries BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 5�hq"' HonanM Road CaJaY Road B 1201 Avau Morin Site Location 1ltnA' q LL a ®� n ltmAva eN ©OpenStreetMap(and)contributors,CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map 625 Ferndale Road O(KESrono, Minnesota 2014-241) f 0 0.125 0.25 Miles N � i KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A A 1 • .+ • ; "40- Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure x ^.* "� are approximate and do not constitute an 16 1 CCED 411 . official survey product. ... ' j h . 14 • 7 . i i 1020 . may �, #1m • d• �h - . ° rrad .vx s • • --..'7. , f� - • y w, 4, _ It - h l,k• .t•- '` Wetland°2: ''�. ,,, •` ✓' - * "7 '*' 0,± i. ` j I p M - P 1.,•• • 4,,. • ", y '., i• „ +` $X3 r . , 4.. t,- egille 4 •`4I / i • �}jp T k" �k • f r N ' . ' I . . . i �.[[ 1 f f. ... .0(•.,„•.; * _' ,''K ffi!�►�,1t VI". � Lft e , .i. it. 4 1111 'Ai, '1!:4 i'- 4, ' 4 - 2 .Aft. - % , 14,1k1 r: * !* , �', `.. , r.,,ria . 1000 ':. 1- V -`• • 4.,4_ ,: • •. • ••Wetland 1 "• w; a' i iv , 4.,r ra �.. 10ft Lidar Contours .0• ,' .0* �3r, to a y 1 , t Transect C. , _' ,_ 4 Wetland Boundary ' '•f: 0", :zy#P,IYA. 2 Figure 2 - Property Boundary Map (2013 FSA Photograph) 625 Ferndale Road (ICES 2014-241) 1.;,y 0 100 200 Orono,Minnesota Feet �. ,c, N ••••••• ,/ KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY A +I 64,