Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-11-2006 Council Work Session Packet Council Work Session 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 11, 2006 Orono City Council Chambers AGENDA 1. Report by County Assessor in Preparation for Board of Review Hearing 2. Dakota Rail Easement far Driveway to Serve Crystal Bay Road Properties 3. New Radio Read System for Water Meter Reading 4. Joint Utility Agreement with Long Lake 5. Mapping of Road Corridor for Frontage Road to Serve Industrial Properties South of Highway 12 and East of Old Crystal Bay Road 6. Other TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members �� G FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator �' ./ DATE: April 5, 2006 �` SUBJECT: New Radio Read Water Meter System Approximately two years ago,the City purchased a radio-read system for water meter reading from Badger as part of initiating the ability to remotely read water meters. This included software, a remote water meter reader, and an initial supply of water meters equipped with radio-read heads. The system that was purchased was selected to be compatible with the City of Wayzata, which was the first City adjacent to Orono to move toward a radio-read system. To date,the City has installed about 200 of the radio-read water meters. Recently,as part of working with the Orono Schools regarding the upgrading of their water meters, we used a consultant who has worked with the Neptune radio read system that has more capabilities and has a substantially more powerful hand-held reader than our current system. The reader is powerful enough to provide readings from a greater distance,i.e.from a pick-up on the street rather than walking up to the house. The system also can provide more information that can be used to diagnose water usage problems. Based on the information from the consultant, and additional information obtained from the system vendor,we have determined that,because we are early in the process of the change-over to the radio-read water meters, the benefits of the new system merit changing to the new system. This involves purchasing the new hand-held meter reader and related software, and purchasing a supply of water meters with the new heads. The cost of purchasing a new hand-held meter, new software, and training is $8,937.50. The new water meters cost $187.50 per meter. This is very similar to the cost of the Badger radio-read meters. The City currently has an inventory of 150 Badger radio-read water meters that were planned for installation in the neighborhood south of County Road 15 and West of County Road 19. These meters will be returned to Badger,and we will replace them with Neptune meters. The existing installed Badger radio-read meters can be retrofitted with Neptune heads at a cost of$90.00 each. The Badger meters will be retrofitted over time,as we have an opportunity to get into the homes. TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator /� DATE: April 6, 2006 SUBJECT: Joint Sewer Agreement with Long Lake Orono has a number of neighborhoods that have city sewer service that connect to the Long Lake sewer system in order to get to the Long Lake MCES lift station located at the intersection of Orono Orchard Road and Orono Oaks Drive. Most of these are small neighborhoods with less than ten connections. In addition, as part of the sewer work related to the Highway 12 project, the sewer flow from the North Long Lake neighborhood in Orono was rerouted through the Long Lake system so that Orono could eliminate a lift station at Brown Road and Highway 12. This brought the total number of properties using the Long Lake sewer system to about 200. The original agreements with Long Lake regarding the small neighborhood connections included a sewer connection fee equal to the Long Lake sewer connection fee, and no operating fee (i.e. no quarterly sewer fee) payable to Long Lake. The flow from these sewer interconnections is not metered, but the estimated sewer flows are credited to Long Lake, and the per unit MCES sewage treatment charges are then billed to Orono by the MCES. With the addition of the North Long Lake neighborhood sewer flows to the Long Lake system, Orono and Long Lake staff have been reviewing the existing sewer agreements, and discussing options for sharing the costs of the maintenance of the jointly used Long Lake sewer lines, and lift stations where applicable. Long Lake has proposed that, rather than calculating the volume of sewer flows from Orono to Long Lake, so that Orono pays the correct amount to the Met Council Environmental Services for sewage treatment, Long Lake would pay the treatment costs for all of the flows, and would charge Orono the same sewer charge Long Lake charges to its own residents--$67.00 per unit per quarter. Currently, Orono has a broad range of arrangements with the Cities that have shared sewer flows. For sewer flows from Orono to Wayzata from the Chevy Chase neighborhood, Orono pays the Metro sewage treatment costs, but no quarterly costs to Wayzata. For flows from Orono to Wayzata from the Old Long Lake Road area, Orono does not pay the Metro costs, but pays a quarterly fee to Wayzata of$88.00 per unit per quarter. For sewer flows into Long Lake, Orono pays the metro treatment costs, but does not pay any quarterly fees. Orono does not currently charge any operating costs to Medina for the sewer flows from Medina Morningside. Because the Long Lake sewer fee is significantly lower than the Orono sewer fee, it is possible to pay the full Long Lake sewer fee, while still having a portion of the Orono fee available for Orono sewer costs. The remaining questions are whether the remaining portion of the Orono fee is sufficient to cover the share of Orono's overall sewer costs related to the properties connected to Long Lake, and whether this revenue split is a reasonable solution. Orono's quarterly sewer fee is $96. This fee is higher than the average fees charged by other cities, due mainly to the operation and maintenance costs for 45 sewer lift stations. The MCES charges are about 35% of the sewer system operating cost, or $35 per quarter, which leaves $61 per quarter for system operation and maintenance. Long Lake's sewer fee is proposed to be about $67 per quarter which covers the MCES treatment charges in addition to the Long Lake system operation and maintenance costs. After factoring out the $35 per quarter MCES charges from both Orono's $96 sewer fee, and Long Lake's $67 fee, the revenue that would be available to cover Orono's sewer maintenance costs would be reduced by $29 per property per quarter, or a total of$23,200 per year based on the 200 units connected to the Long Lake system. This is about 4% of the annual budget for the operation and maintenance of the Orono sewer system. The 200 units are about 10% of the total sewer units in Orono. Although the Long Lake fees would reduce Orono's revenues, the amount of the fee is within the range of reasonableness. TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator �� DATE: April 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Driveway Easement in Dakota Rail Corridor for Crystal Bay Road Properties Several properties on Crystal Bay Road use a driveway that is in the Dakota Rail Corridor right-of-way for access. Although this driveway has been used for many years, the properties do not have a legal right to use it. As the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) now owns the Dakota Rail Corridor, they have jurisdiction over the driveway. The HCRRA has agreed to provide an easement to the City that enables the driveway to continue to be used. The cost of the easement is $84,879.81. The cost of the easement is to be allocated to the benefiting properties. There are a number of issues related to this cost allocation. These include whether the costs should be allocated on a per-unit basis or a linear foot basis,whether a portion of the cost should be allocated to the City,whether all parcels that abut the driveway benefit from the driveway, and whether the cost should be assessed to the properties over a number of years. It is important for the council to discuss these issues prior to meeting with the affected property owners. There are seven properties along the driveway. The width of the properties along the driveway varies, with one property being a double lot. If the easement cost was allocated on a per-unit basis, each property would pay $12,125. If the cost was allocated by linear foot, the cost per property would vary widely, due to the large differences in the width of the lots adjacent to the driveway. The City has generally allocated the cost of sewer projects on a per-unit basis rather than on a linear foot basis, so that properties pay the same amount, regardless of how wide the lots are. Some of the early projects were assessed partly on a per-unit basis and partly on a linear foot basis. The City has a water line that runs parallel to the driveway, on the north edge of the driveway. The driveway is the only means of accessing the water line to perform maintenance and repair activities. This raises the question of whether the City should pay a portion of the easement cost. If the driveway was privately owned,and the City needed an easement for access to the water line, the City would compensate the property owner for an easement. On one of the properties, the house is located closer to Crystal Bay Road, has its access from Crystal Bay Road, and does not use the driveway for access. If the owner of this property was to object to an assessment for the easement, it may be difficult to show that the driveway easement would provide a substantial benefit to this property. An option to consider is to allocate the costs on a per-unit basis,and treat the City as one unit. Then,the total cost would be divided by one additional unit.This addresses the concern about the City's responsibility,and because it reduces the cost per unit,it is a good compromise between the per-unit allocation and the per-linear-foot allocation. It is recommended that the cost to the benefiting properties be assessed over a 15 year period at an interest rate of 6.25%. A copy of the easement is attached. The easement is not a perpetual easement. The easement language enables the HCRRA to terminate the easement at the time the land is needed for the purposes of the HCRRA. Because the purpose of the HCRRA is rail transportation, the easement could be terminated if the land is needed for a light rail line. The probability of the land being needed in the foreseeable future for light rail is very low for two reasons. First, light rail is many years away from this portion of the metro area. Second,the land in Minnetonka Beach that is directly east of the land in the easement is owned by Minnetonka Beach and used as a public street. This land will not be available to the HCRRA for a light rail line. So a light rail line would not be able to be located in the driveway area. However, the area could be used for a use that supports the light rail line. r , w R Agreement No. 73-37379 ALLEY EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT made on this day of , 20 , by and between the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA), a political subdivision and local government unit, under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR"), and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, GRANTOR is the owner of certain right of way (by fee, easement, license, joint use agreement, governmental grant or other interest) located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, commonly referred to as the Dakota Rail Corridor (hereinafter referred to as "Corridor"), formerly owned by the Burlington Northern Railroad Company and Dakota Rail, Inc.; WHEREAS, GRANTOR acquired the Corridor for transportation purposes, including without limitation, rail, bus, bicycle and foot travel, for the location of communication facilities, including fiber optics lines, and for other future transportation uses; WHEREAS, GRANTEE maintains that certain public roadway, generally known as Crystal Bay Road located in the City of Orono. Crystal Bay Road connects to that certain public roadway in the City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach generally known as Northview Road. Both public roadways are located in the vicinity of the Corridor. WHEREAS, Seven (7) single family residences are located in the City of Orono facing Crystal Bay Road to the north and the Corridor to the south on those certain parcels of land legally described in Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as "Alley Access Parcels"). Traffic from the south {ot lines of the Alley Access Parcels currently access Northview Road by encroaching upon a portion of GRANTOR's Corridor that runs upon and is parallel to the Corridor. WHEREAS, GRANTEE has requested and GRANTOR has agreed to grant to GRANTEE a nonexclusive public alley easement over that portion of the Corridor legally described on "Exhibit B" (hereinafter referred to as the "Easement Area") for ingress and egress from 1 � t Northview Road to the Alley Access Parcels for such time that such access is consistent with GRANTOR's current and future intended use of the Corridor; WHEREAS GRANTEE wishes to make certain guarantees to GRANTOR in exchange for the grant of easement. NOW THEREFORE, GRANTOR and GRANTEE agree to the following: 1 . GRANTOR, in consideration of the sum of Eighty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Nine and 81/100 Dollars (584,879.81), the "Cost" of this easement, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR from GRANTEE, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants unto GRANTEE, a nonexclusive easement for a public alley (hereinafter referred to as "Alley") over that portion of the Corridor legally described on "Exhibit B" (hereinafter referred to as the "Easement Area") and depicted on "Exhibit C" for ingress and egress from the south lot lines of the Alley Access Parcels to Northview Road for such time that such access is consistent with GRANTOR's current and future intended use of the Corridor as determined by GRANTOR in its sole discretion. Included in this grant of easement is the right to construct, maintain and sign the Alley, in such manner that does not conflict with GRANTOR's use of the Corridor as solely determined by GRANTOR, and as limited by the terms of this easement agreement. 2. Said easement shall be limited solely to providing public access for up to seven (7? noncommercial seasonal recreational or homestead single family residences, located on the Alley Access Parcels as those parcels are currently configured. The easement shall expire automatically if use of the Alley Access Parcels changes. The Alley shall have a passage way of not wider than twenty-five (25) feet and shall be located fully within the Easement Area. Upon expiration or other termination of this easement, GRANTEE shall deliver to GRANTOR a release of easement suitable for recordation. 3. This easement is granted with the understanding that plans for the segment of the Corridor affected by this arant of easement are only preliminary. GRANTOR reserves the right without further consideration, at GRANTEE's sole expense, upon two hundred seventy (270) days written notice from GRANTOR to GRANTEE, to terminate the easement and require removal of any Alley improvements or to require relocation or modification of the Alley, if GRANTOR determines that doing so is necessary for implementation of alternate uses on the Corridor. Such uses shall include, without limitation, operations, changed operations or planned operations of any current or future transportation system for rail, bicycle or foot travel or any other public use; and shall include, without limitation, renewal, replacement, repair, alteration or construction of tracks, bridges, culverts, thruway facilities, structures, properties, facilities and appurtenances. In the event GRANTEE fails to so relocate, alter, change, or remove the Alley within two hundred seventy (270) days after notice, GRANTOR may remove, alter or relocate such Alley at GRANTEE's expense, or terminate the easement. In the event that GRANTOR, at GRANTOR's initiative other than as a consequence of GRANTEE default, causes the termination of this easement at any time within Ten (10) years of the commencement date of this easement, GRANTOR shall reimburse GRANTEE for the Cost of this easement as follows: GRANTOR shall pay to GRANTEE the Cost of this easement less ten per cent (10%) per year, or partial year, that has passed since the commencement date of this easement.lf 2 GRANTOR requires that the Alley, or portion of Alley, be changed, altered, or removed for any reason, GRANTEE shall deliver to GRANTOR a release of the easement, or a release of a portion of the easement as applicable, suitable for recordation. GRANTEE acknowledges and agrees that no further processes or vacation proceedings are or will be, necessary to put into effect termination of this easement, and if any is required, GRANTEE hereby unconditionally consents to said vacation or termination as a part of the consideration for the granting of this easement. The granting of this easement shall not be deemed a dedication by statute or common law, nor shall continued use and maintenance of the Easement Area create a roadway accruing to the public or any individual in the meaning of Minn. Stat. Sec. 160.05, subd. 2. GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, shall be responsible for all maintenance (including without limitation, trash and snow removal, weed control and removal of diseased, dead or hazardous trees), all permitted improvements, special assessments and all costs related thereto, and all other costs related in any other manner to use of the Easement Area or any required relocation of the Alley or termination of the easement. GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, shall be responsible for the payment, if any, of relocation benefits or costs or just compensation due to third parties resulting from termination of the easement rights granted by this agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this easement agreement is not intended to create rights in third party beneficiaries other than that to the general public for use of the Easement Area as a public alley until such date this easement agreement is terminated by GRANTOR. 4. GRANTEE and its contractors shall not unreasonably interfere with use of the Corridor for transportation or other public purposes except with consent of GRANTOR which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. GRANTEE'S use of the Easement Area is subservient to all federal laws and rec�ulations governing rail operations on the Corridor. 5. Prior to construction of any modification or relocation of the Alley, GRANTEE shall submit its plans to GRANTOR for review and comment. GRANTOR reserves the right to reject any plans for construction proposed by GRANTEE on the grounds, in GRANTOR's sole discretion, that said plans are inappropriate or incompatible with its present or future use of the Corridor. No work shall be done or obstruction placed over any track or pathway on the Corridor unless GRANTEE has arranged to furnish, at GRANTEE's or its contractors' expense, such flagging as GRANTOR deems necessary for protection of railroad or other transportation operations on the Corridor. Such flagging shall not relieve GRANTEE or its contractors from any liability. 6. The rights granted herein shall be effective upon full execution of this Agreement subject to the rights of those certain parties identified in section 14. 7. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify, defend and hold GRANTOR and its officers, directors and employees harmless from and against all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense of every nature including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, whether or not suit be brought, resulting from injury to or death of persons or loss or destruction to property which arises out of or in any 3 way is connected with or incident to the exercise of GRANTEE'S rights on, over, and across the Easement Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision is not intended to waive GRANTOR's or GRANTEE's statutory and common-law rights to limitations and defense on liability. 8. GRANTEE hereby covenants and warrants that it shall not use, employ, deposit, store, dispose of, place or otherwise release on the Easement Area, in connection with the exercise of its rights under this Easement, any hazardous substance, hazardous waste or pollutant or contaminant as such terms are defined under any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, rule, code or regulation, nor shall it create or permit any condition on the Easement Area that could present a threat to human health or to the environment. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify defend and hold GRANTOR and its successors and assigns harmless against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense resulting from or due to the release of or threatened release of hazardous substances, hazardous wastes or any pollutants or contaminants or any other environmentally regulated materials, including petroleum products and the various constituents thereof, which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed or otherwise released on or from the Easement Area by GRANTEE, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision is not intended to waive GRANTOR's or GRANTEE's statutory and common-law rights to limitations and defense on liability. 9. GRANTOR reserves the right to use and occupy the Easement Area and shall have the right to agree to other occupations of the Easement Area by one or more persons or firms, provided, however, such uses shall not unreasonably interfere with the easement rights granted hereunder. 10. GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, is responsible at its sole cost for the design, construction and maintenance of the Alley, including the installation and maintenance of advance warning signs and pavement markings in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) as may be needed at present or in the future due to GRANTOR's adjacent use of the Corridor. 1 1 . This grant of easement is conditioned upon the premise that use of the Alley and exercise of the rights granted under this.- Agreement shall not adversely affect future transportation uses and other use of the Corridor for transportation purposes including without limitation, rail, bus, bicycle and foot travel, for the location of communication facilities, including fiber optics and for other future transportation uses or other future public uses. 12. The rights herein granted are subject to existing rights of way, whether or not of record, for highway, roads, railroads, pipelines, canals, laterals, ditches and fiber optic, electrical or other transmission lines, and should it, at any time, become necessary because of GRANTEE`s use of the Easement Area to relocate any of said facilities by reason of GRANTEE'S exercise of the rights granted herein, GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, shall bear and pay the cost of so doing. GRANTEE also accepts said Easement Area subject to any want or failure at any time of GRANTOR's title to said Easement Area or any part thereof and GRANTEE shall assume any 4 damages sustained by GRANTEE in connection therewith. GRANTEE also accepts such Easement Area subject to rights of any party, including GRANTOR, in and to any roadways, easements, leases and permits, whether granted, at GRANTOR's sole discretion, either prior to or after the date of this Easement Agreement except that any subsequent grant shall not unreasonably interfere with GRANTEE'S use of the Easement Area. GRANTEE agrees to provide to GRANTOR or other tenants of GRANTOR access over across, and through the Easement Area should such access be deemed necessary by GRANTOR. GRANTEE accepts said Easement Area subject to the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors when reasonably necessary to walk upon said Easement Area to repair adjacent property and the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors to temporarily place equipment upon the property when reasonably necessary for the purpose of maintaining, repairing, inspecting or constructing upon GRANTOR's property. 13. It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument covers all the agreements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. 14. The terms of this agreement are subject to the rights of the State of Minnesota contained in Agreement between Hennepin, Carver and McLeod County Regional Railroad Authorities and the State of Minnesota dated December 23, 2002 (MnDot Agreement No. 84001 , HCRRA No. A06072) and Mortgage of Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority to the State of Minnesota (HCRRA No. A06062) dated November 14, 2002. 15. This easement agreement and the rights and obligations of GRANTEE contained herein shall not be assigned to or assumed by others without the express written consent of GRANTOR. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. THIS PORTION OF THE PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK . . .r . . 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of , 20 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY Reviewed By: By: Assistant County Attorney Chair, Board of Commissioners And: Deputy/Executive Director Attest: Deputy/Clerk of HCRRA Board CITY OF ORONO By: Its: Mayor By: its: Reviewed By: By: City Attorney Its: City organized under: Plan A Plan B Charter This Instrument was drafted by: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority 417 North 5th St., Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1362 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by , Chair, Board of Commissioners, Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by , Deputy / Executor, Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 200_, by and , the Mayor, and City Administrator, of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said munieipal corporation. Notary Public 7 I )� '.� � � -��_.� `YL.. East Line cf Gov 't Lot 6, 17-117-2�-----��" � � �EXHIBIT C ��� 17-117-23-41--0011 "' � ; "2j� ', 16-117-Z3-32-0054 , ��i`1 � DEPICTION EASEiV�NT AREA � s I7j � 3205 Grystal Bay Road -� � , , '� 1-'c'3 , � � `' : � �l 9i. ', �:,' (V , i �i , � i �_'v� � �` Bdy�7I0'� � � � �'� ' � � 17-117-23-41-0009 �� ' � i � � ' �\� � �� 3235 Crystal Bay Road �, � !� � a . , ----- � W E ; Y � �,, � - �(�'` \ 17-117-23-41-0012 ``�� •,���' • \`1�i �.�4� ; • . . , �`}. �5 u��'ai oay r+0ad �� � i I '� • � - � � .y( . (� � �` � 1 i , ���`� \ ✓ � � � � S � � ' � `'�'� ` ` l.f�'�•; ( ` r`�t' �c., 't ` i �� �'�f_� �e� � � Ir'��� � �j�� �e ` '.. '(�, �'>`,::;_.:.� I � 17-117-23-41-0014 \ �- ea�A r�' ..,.•.•:• ''. -!::�::. = � {:� \ 3265 Crystal Bay Road \ QJ�11,g�� ;'l` ... . ....r. , �:'_;: '•30� / i � � � � � . k �L� �� C a��'L �`� �� % A NORTH BEARING �N THIS SURVEY � ' IS GRID NORTH AS BASED UPON THE �--�`� ``�.` ��a o c�e ��� , ,�o Q p, M I N N E S O T A C D�F O I N A T E S Y S T E M, � �'�. . � � _ : -;;" :.•` Za�ti� . / SOUTHERN ZDNE. NAO 1983. i .� � C � , �9,r'�Qe � \ .�, _ �;<;. �oo �\(�' ,� ` 'P .-y: - t o za ,o i , �\ _ � ., , ,: � �, , . .; , �,� � � . , \ �_O� � '�•. . - - _ � � . 1 .- �'��oE i � � � _ - , � ._ , � 17-117-23-41-0015 ��.•'• � � � . �`� 3285 Crystal 9ay Aoad ''� ` ` �. g0 - �"" / . . ,�. .^- t . � �` �� ; . � 1� � �.. _ L��3VD � � � . . � . - i \ Qp .."-..`': -' � I \�`� �A�� ,a-y�� ,� �� PFIDPEaTY LINE � . , Q, `. . - - o,�a LOT LINE i `� � � P�AT LINE ° . �. ..-'��I._=.,::�>' ,.pa t1 �. �e r :� t - Y - 17-117-23-41-a013 � �. � - �'�' r� C�`f-�'' � ALLEY EASEMENT �INE i • �` Vk\ � 3295 Crystal 6ay Foad . `� �. `•� � � EASEMENT LINE � . ,d�'' � : �`�'� --�� p�� , i, ��- � �5 e --- , �� .... : i - � ...... . . ;�. c� ('' �� .` ......... . � 0 N ........... , � j , ���-� '..��; Cp � A� �,�_ . ._........... , ..:.�-; ---------- 6g P Q TAX DZVISI N LI E i � ��L . `\ � �..�'..�� � � '' `�.'? I � � - _ :•' ,�A� �GPP RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE i �i� :�� r� � �.:':> . . \\� _� `_ �_�.L � ��. _ _- A 1,�A� ' e p� SECTiON LINE ; �`, � . ' . ���v��'�Y�� 17-117-23-41�016 u�v� .� ,s:` `;` `�,.';'r' ✓ � 2��1� ���������. BUIL�ING WALL � �;`�a "� iL� 3309 Gystal Bay Road `` �. e�� � . ' r• � G EDGE OF WO�DS & 6RUSH t= ` � . i �� � `� ,.�f`_'.' �,�� CONCRETE SURFACE i \ `\ ��- � � �A�,.`::' . / � \ a � ^ � BITUMINOUS SURFACE i C3 , ., � 5�� � `F� �� GRAVEL SURFACE i � .::...::::::. '�~:- .' i \ �,i•::�:ri:i•:�i:•::.��',-' .`a ' � , . B ..'2?:.'rr.{i'rr.'r.-."�.:.:�-5�5 `,`�tS ` Y . � t • OENOTES FOUND MONUMENT L_�i� i �� -- ' . -b98 � ��s - , --a- POWEA POLE � . . --- ,�1'.:-:�:::•:=::-}::=�":::}::=�r 1 ' ,�==-- _ - � 6,P >>'� , pg�t�9� : . �� =�._ _ ��'� Q' FIRE HYORANT � � ' oE -. `a� f ,�,�, '� � -::::' ce � e+ti��ot�� �S 0 �� � �ECIOUOUS TREE i .'�' / i i { � -i MEMORANDUM To: Mayor& Council From: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director ' Date: Apri17, 2006 Subject: Official Mapping of Industrial District Service Road Corridor As a result of discussions about an Industrial District service road with representatives of the Ryan Companies and with Peter Johnson representing Morrie's, it appears that both entities are on board with a public service road location that would serve their respective properties. City Attorney Matt Brokl has suggested that the City take steps to adopt an"Official Map" of the road, which would establish a definite corridor location and provide the current property owners as well as potential purchasers/developers with a firm expectation of the City's intent. The steps in such a mapping process include: 1) Get cost estimate for survey work. 2) Notify all property owners of costs to do the mapping process. 3) Staff/Council/ stakeholder meeting to discuss process, locations, costs 4) City surveys the proposed corridor and generates a map. 5) Property owners notified, hold a public hearing, accept comments. 6) Council adopts Official Map by ordinance. Ryan Companies has requested that the City proceed with the mapping process. We are requesting that Council authorize staff to obtain quotes for the survey costs for this process.