The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-25-2010 Council Work Session Packet Council Work Session Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers AGENDA l. Request for Proposal for Law Enforcement Services—Correy Farniok (15 minutes) 2. CommonBond Discussion—Jessica Loftus/Mike Gaffron/Melanie Curtis (45 minutes) o Letter from Attorney Schieffer 3. Comments Regarding Information Updates—Lin Vee (5 minutes) 4. Other Issues of Current Interest Previous Work Session Topics May 1 l, 2010—Minutes Attached o CommonBond Discussion o Comments Regarding Information Updates o Other Issues of Current Interest Apri127, 2010 o CommonBond Discussion o Processing Complex Zoning Applications - Start To Finish o Comments Regarding Information Updates o Other Issues of Current Interest - � =�''�_ _ �.'�'�s'°�1�'e m� .v� C I T Y O F LONG LAKE May 19, 2010 Orono Police Department Attn: Police Chief Correy Farniok 2730 Kelley Parkway Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 Re: Request for Proposal for City of Long Lake Policin� Services Transmittal Dear Chief Farniok: The City of Long Lake is currently seeking Request for Proposal (RFP) responses from several local police agency service providers for the provision of law enforcement services in the City of Long Lake beginning January 1, 2011. The City is currently receiving such services from the City of Orono Police Department. The cities of Long Lake and Orono have been unable to resolve future police contract funding issues. Because of this impasse, the Long Lake City Council has unanimously directed staff to seek other options. "I'he City of Long Lake is .9 square miles, is surrounded by the City of Orono on all borders, has an estimated Metropolitan Council population of 1,723, and has a low crime rate. The RFP customer requirements include a request for an all-inclusive fixed fee basic service level in addition to a per patrol hourly fee for supplemental dedicated monthly patrol hours within the City boundaries. In addition to providing this information, respondents should also be available to be interviewed by the Long Lake City Council and staff to describe in detail how policing from your department is operationally planned to be provided. Please review the attachment to determine if your department will be bidding on these requested services. If so, please return a written bid response by June I8, 2010 to City of Long Lake, Attn: Terrance Post, City Administrator, PO Box 606, Long Lake, 55356. If you have any questions, please contact me at(952) 473-6961 ext. 2. Sincerely, �//' Tenan e R. Post City Administrator cc: Long Lake City Council enc: Law Enforcement Services RFP 4�0 Virginia Avenue• P.O. Box 606 • Long Lake, Minnesota 553�6 •952-473-6961 •952-476-9622(fax)•http:iiwww.ci.long-lake.mn.us � � C I T Y" O F LONG LAKE LAW ENFORCEMENT SER�'ICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) T1�e City� of Lon� Lake desires to eilter into a law enforcement and traffic law enforcement services Agreement with a police services provider commencing January 1, ?011. The following customer requirements are requested to be addressed in provider's written response: 1. The initial term of such agreeinent shall be for a period commencing on January 1, 201 l and terminating December 31, 2013. Such three-year term will be"rolling" in nature in that either party must communicate to the other by August 1�t�' of the current contract year if tl�ey wish to term inate the agreement by the end of the last(third j year of the aQreement. 2. The initial provision of services for the years 201 l and 2012 will contain no price escalators and be fixed in nature. BeQinning in the year 2013, the contracting agency will specify which price escalator metric wili be utilized. Such metric must be adopted for followin�year pricing by July 31 s` of the current contract year. 3. The City of Long Lake desires price quotations for two very different types of services. The first level of service is a fixed priced all-inclusive "basic" level that would encompass the full ranae of enforcement and administrative support services excludin� dedicated patrol hours within the City's corporate boundaries. Examples of, but not a complete listing, of administrative services include pre-employment background checks, special events, nuisance dogs, animal impounds, liquor and tobacco license applications, alcohol and tobacco compliance checks, parking enforcement, and seasonal road restrictions. The City is still evaluating the need for supplemental dedicated patrol services within the City's corporate boundaries beyond a basic level of service. Providers should indicate wl�at the hourlti� rate for dedicated supplemental services would be. 4. Provider sl�all propose a servicin, strateg��that, in their opinion, optimizes public safet�� services for residents and businesses. This discussion sbould include targeted response times, achieving a I�eaithy patrol preseuce, and establishing aood public relations. �. Discussion of current pro��ider staffing levels and coverage area. Would capacih� to service Lon� Lake come from existing staff, or would new staff be required? 6. Discussion of current coverage area and how the addition of Long Lake would be inteQrated into patrolling. 7. The City requests that montlily presentations be made to the City Council regarding the previous month's activity and any trends or concerns the community should be aw�are of going for��ard. 8. The City realizes tl�at eacl� a�enc}�responding to this RFP may have its own legal services a�reement format. Modifications to and changes to the format are anticipated and will require recommendation for approval from the City Attorney. However, the customer requirements indicated above�vill be represented in tl�e final aQreement format. rev0517]0 4>0 Viiginia Avenue• P.O. Box 606 •Lon� Lake,Mimiesota ��35(i • 9�?-473-6961 • 9�2-476-9622 (faaj •1�ttp:;�:N�.ci.lona-lake.mn.us - Meeting Date: May 18, 2010 ---°; REQEJEST FOR �4CTION ,c i i o r' LONV �/'iK� �� I COU�4i� Lo��LAt� Agenda Item: No, 6 Subject: Request for Proposals, Law Enforcement Services �; ��-� I 1 Prepared By: Terrance Post, City Administrator Staff Initiais: l�� ,f � Recommended Cif.v Council Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve the Request for Praposal (RFP) for Law Enforcement Services and to direct staff to issue said RrP to selected municipal and county service providers. Overview / Background The cities of Long Lake and Orono have been in discussions for most of the past year concerning changes the Cfty of Orono would like to institute to a Law Enforcement Agreement that was last formally adopted in 20D3. The changes basically involve both the way police services are delivered (i.e, from a '�basic and suppiemental"approach to a "service district" approach); and the way the cost of services are aliocated out to contract cities (i.e, from an equal weighting of population and market value factors to the addition of calls as a factor coupled with a reduction in the weighting of the market value factor). While the City of Long Lake has been supportive of a service district policing approach, the cost implications �f the proposed change in allocation factors has not been supported by the �ity of Long Lake. These cost allocation factor changes would have seen Long Lake allocated costs increase (after Orono '�subsidy'� from a baseline of$302,177 in 2009 to $356,000 in 2012. This would represent a three-year, $53,8Z3 or 17.8% increase. Both cities agreed that if contract agreement cost allocation issues could not be mutuaily resolved by June 1, 2010, that other alternatives would be pursued. It appears unlikely that outstanding issues will be resolved by June 1, 2010. Staff recommends approval or"the attached Request for Proposal for Law Enforcement Services. Staff intends to issue RFP's to the municipal Police Departments of Medina, Orono, and Wayzata, in addition to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Department. Proposals wiil be accepted through Friday, June 18, 2010, to be reviewed immediately thereafter. Each law enforcernent agency responding to the RFP will als� be required to make an interview presentation to the Long Lake City Council to be conducted prior to July 16, 2010. It is anticipated that the selection of a law enforcement agency to begin delivery of law enforcement services on January l, 2011 could be chosen by the first regular City of Long Lake Council meeting in August. Supportinq Information • Request for proposal (RFP) • RFP Transmittal Letter Example Financial Impact: �0 Budgeted (Y/ N)? Source: Notes: . � � RE��'IV�D MEMORANDUM j��A�1' � �2�� TO: ORONO CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF C'TMOFpRO'�� FROM: R. J. Schieffer, Conflicts Attomey � �+ �.��_,,� �� . ,�� ,,��na,,,�A DATE: May 14, 2010 °""�r�','`- ,. .�,�✓�� RE: Willowfire Utility Agreement I drafted a letter to be sent to the Mr. Post and the Long Lake City Council prior to their meeting on May 18, 2010. The letter identified and refuted the issues raised by Mr. Post and stated we would be in attendance to further clarify these issues. However, on Friday morning I received a message from Jessica Loftus saying that Mayor White had a conversation with Mayor Gilbert and they agreed that Orono representatives not attend that meeting. Instead, I understand the two mayors arranged a meeting later in the month to address the water capacity issue. I then redrafted the letter as a discussion item. The letter has not been sent to Long Lake officials at this time. RJS 5-14-10 - . �� : � DOVE FRETLAND & VAN VALKENBURG LAURA K.FRETLAND PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP PARALEGAL PAUL D.DOVE ' ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAURA J.LINS JANE VAN VALKENBURG 5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416-1492 413 SOUTH RUM RIVER DRIVE,SUITE 6 OF COUNSEL PRINCETON,MN 55371 952-545-9000 763-389-2214 RICHARD J.SCHIEFFER FAX: 952-545-1793 FAX: 763-389-5506 DAMIEN F TOVEN FAX: 952-542-9210 800-343-4545 "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW 235 HASSAN STREET SE SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE E-MAIL�. DFW@DFWLAW.COM HUTCHINSON,MN 55350 BAR ASSOCIATION VVWW.DFWLAW.COM 320-587-6239 FAX:320-587-4096 May 14, 2010 Terrance R. Post Long Lake City Administrator P.O. Box 606 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 RE: Long Lake/Orono 2002 Willowfire Addition Utility Agreement Our File No. 13565 Dear Mr. Post: This office represents the City of Orono as conflicts counsel with respect to the negotiation of the Police Services Contract, and I have been asked to review several questions regarding the above agreement as well. These questions arise both from your written comments regarding the Orono Comprehensive Plan on April 26, 2010, and from information which you provided orally to Amanda Novak of CommonBond Communities. My inquiries are not interposed to take a position for or against the CommonBond project, but to recognize that this is the first occasion in which the Willowfire Utility Agreement may be put to use and to further recognize that the interpretations given to it at this time could have long-lasting implications far beyond this particular project. I would like to clarify or discuss the following items: 1. Utility Aqreement Validity. In discussions with Ms Novak of CommonBond, apparently you have suggested that the Utility Agreement is no longer enforceable because the members of the City Council have changed since 2002,the implication being that a subsequent city council may safely decline to honor contract provisions. While this theory (a current city council cannot bind future city councils) has some validity on internal city matters such as zoning or special assessment policy, when the rights of third parties are involved, the concept no longer applies. Contracts, whether they involved purchasing a squad car or providing sewer capacity, are binding agreements and require the consent of all parties to make changes. . / ��a��'� , �� 2. Capacitv in the Water Svstem. You have indicated in your comments regarding Orono's Comprehensive Plan (your letter of April 26, 2010), that providing water service to Orono is contingent upon the City of Long Lake determining that it has sufficient capacity in its water system. First, this contingency on capacity only applies to selected properties as set forth in Paragraph 5 of the Utility Agreement. Those properties include the East side of Willow Drive between Watertown Road and the new Highway 12, the properties in the Hackberry neighborhood and the properties on Woodhaven Drive. Second, with respect to Outlot A, Willowfire Addition, Paragraph 5 of the Utility Agreement, provides that the water line constructed by MnDot is available to serve Outlot A. The Utility Agreement further states that Long Lake agrees to provide water service to Outlot A. Therefore, it appears that the capacity issue is not relevant to the providing of water service to Outlot A, Willowfire Addition. It is true that prov�din� water service to the other selected properties mentioned in the preceding paragraph is contingent upon sufficient capacity in the Long Lake water system. However, the Utility Agreement is silent on the question of how the decision is made on the question of capacity. In the event there is future development in any of the selected areas, and a request for water services made, the two cities would have to come to agreement that capacity is lacking. Since this is largely a technical and engineering matter, a release of the pertinent information by both cities would be a step in the right direction. 3. Sewer Connection Charqes. The Utility Agreement is straight forward in that it provides a sewer connection charge of $3,450.00 which includes the metro SAC charge of $1,200.00. There is no escalator clause for the 350 units of sewer capacity covered by the Agreement. Any change in the connection charge of $3,450.00 would require further negotiations between the two Cities. 4. Water Connection Charqe. Paragraph 5 of the Utility Agreement provides that the connection charge for properties in Outlot A, Willowfire Addition is set at $2,700.00 per residential property. Again, there is no escalator clause and any change in that fee would be subject to further negotiations between the two Cities. The water connection charge provisions for the several selected prcperti�s outside of Outlot A mentioned in Paragraph 5 of the Agreement for water service, contain an escalator clause in that the water connection charge for those properties would be the charge in effect at the time the water connection is made. Certainly, CommonBond Communities and the City of Long Lake have the right to negotiate agreements for water and sewer availability for the current proposed project, if they wish to do so. However, to the extent such agreements vary from the terms of the Utility Agreement between Long Lake and Orono, they do not set a precedent for future development of land which may benefit from the Utility Agreement. � ��id'��t�� I would be happy to stop by your office at a time convenient for both of us to discuss any of the issues raised in this letter. Sincerely, DOVE FRETLAND & VAN VALKENBURG, PLLP Richard J. Schieffer RJS:rb cc: Orono City Council Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Michael Gaffron, Asst. City Administrator Melanie, Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator .\� MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: LIN VEE, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: COMMENTS REGARDING INFORMATION UPDATES DATE: MAY 21, 2010 Attached are the Information Update memos from May 7 and May 14 for reference if Council wishes to discuss any of these items. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: ORONO MANAGEMENT TEAM SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE DATE: MAY 7, 2010 • Attached is a summary of permit data from 2007 through Apri127, 2010. The information compares the number of permits, valuation of projects, and city revenue for all types of permits. There is a separate section listing only new structure information. Note: Not all permits are based on valuation. • In February, Orono was awarded$9200 from the Hennepin County 2010 Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Program to be used for organics recycling. The Organics Committee developed an online survey to obtain information that will be helpful in determining effective methods to promote participation in organics recycling. A city-wide postcard mailing announcing the survey was sent on Thursday. Attached are copies of the Postcard and Organics Survey. • Ron Steffenhagen received his "return to wark" authorization as of 5/4/10 and is back to work at the golf course, working in the office. • The City received the attached letter from Joann Anderson,Mayor of Minnetonka Beach,regarding e- bikes on the Dakota Rail Regional TraiL Minnetonka Beach plans to coordinate a joint meeting with neighboring cities and the Three Rivers Park District in the near future. • The City received the attached letter from the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition announcing their intent to dissolve the organization and donate the remaining funds to the Orono Police Department. Action to accept the donation will be scheduled for a future Council meeting. • The City was contacted as a courtesy by the City of Maple Plain recently regarding a request for temparary signage. Maple Plain has requested permission from MNDoT to place a semi-trailer with a large sign on the side along the new Highway 12 within the MNDoT right-of-way. The purpose for the sign would be to let travelers know that Maple Plain businesses are open during the road construction. As this sign would be in the MNDoT right-of-way, City rules would not apply. Additionally, we recently observed a similarly warded sign along the westbound(north) side of Highway 12 just west of the Hwy 12/CR6 interchange. As we are unable to determine if this sign is located on private property or within MNDoT right-of-way we contacted Maple Plain for more information. (MC) • Attached far your information is the May newsletter for the DNR's Shoreland Rules Update Project. Planning staff is following this process. (MC) • Gabriel has advised that the Big Island Docks have been installed. (MPG) • Willie has been warking with property owners on North Farm Road(south of CR 6 east of Brown Road)toward gaining support for a neighborhood sewer project to serve 8 existing homes. The neighborhood is in the MUSA, most homes are pre-1985 vintage, and some do not have alternate septic sites available. Expect more info on this in the next few months. (MPG) Information Update May 7, 2010 • The City received notification that it is a recipient of a federal Election Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities grant in the amount of$9,808. Staff submitted the grant application for automatic doors at City Hall and the Council Chambers as polling place improvements. Action to accept the grant and execute the grant contract will be scheduled for a future Council meeting. (RO) • Mike is warking with Tom Crosby to complete the filing with Hennepin County of the Spring Hill Golf Club plat and�nal documents, dating back to 1999-2000. The short version of a long story is that the plat and associated documents were never filed,pending completion of construction of the golf course and final survey work for the wetland mitigation areas. In the interim, the plat mylars were on hiatus at the City of Medina for a number of years waiting for signatures (the plat is partly in Medina) and then sat here waiting for final assembly of filing documents. In now completing that assembly, it has been determined that certain items were never fully signed by all parties, and Soren indicates the cleanest way to resolve this is to create new documents,have Council reaffirm them, and have the current Mayor, Clerk and Spring Hill representatives sign them. Therefore, as a last-minute addition to Monday's agenda, Mike will be presenting for reaffirmation a Guest House CUP Resolution adopted by Council in 1999, a Trail Easement Agreement approved in 1999/2000, and a quit-claim deed to extinguish prior wetland easements that will be re-dedicated via new easements as part of the plat. We didn't reach the conclusion that reaffirmation was necessary until after the packets went out today, so you will see these documents Monday night. (MPG) • Additional attachments: o Friday Fax, a legislative update from League of Minnesota Cities—April 30, 2010 o Metro Cities News—May 7, 2010 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: ORONO MANAGEMENT TEAM SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE DATE: MAY 14, 2010 • Website Update—Following Council approval of the GovOffice software for website redevelopment, staff worked with the web designer in January and February to prepare the site for redevelopment. Staff has completed training and is working on updating and rebuilding pages from the current website to the new website for testing. The existing website has over 40 sections,most of which have sub-sections within them, consisting of approximately 200 pages. Approximately 20°/o of the Administration pages have been rebuilt. Planning and Zoning and the Police Departments are also warking on their sections. The goal is to have the new website "live"in early September. • Planning Staff inet with Terry Schneider who represents the Klinglehutz property at 2535 &2545 Shadywood Road to discuss a Memory Care facility project for the site. We expect to see an application fairly soon for a 20-unit building. The site is zoned B-4 (Office)in which nursing homes are an allowed conditional use. • Staff(Mike, Melanie, Evelyn, Scott and Tom Kellogg)met with Bob Erickson (Welsh Co), Steve Johnston and representatives of Ecumen to discuss a Senior Care Project at 875 Wayzata Blvd. It was a productive meeting and the City should be expecting an application(RPUD rezoning&Concept Plan approval)by the deadline for the June PC meeting. (MC) • Over 200 responses to the Organics Survey were received this week—the response deadline is May 315C • Addirional attachments: o Friday Fax, a legislative update from League of Minnesota Cities—May 7, 2010 o Metro Cities News—May 14, 2010 Orono City Council Committee of the Whole May 11, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers Present: MayorJim White, Council Members Doug Franchot, Lili McMillan and Jim Murphy; City Administrator Jessica Loftus, Assistant City Administrator for Long-Term Strategy Mike Gaffron, Planning and Zoning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, City Clerk Lin Vee, Attorney Dick Schieffer 1. CommonBond Discussion Attorney Dick Shieffer, conflict counsel for Orono, attended the work session. Discussion ensued regarding the financing alternatives for purchase of the city property for the proposed CommonBond project and concerns, including utilities, raised by the Long Lake Council regarding the project. 2. Comments Regarding Information Updates There were no comments. 3. Other Issues of Current Interest Status of the Police Services Contract with Long Lake was discussed. It was noted Long Lake intends to send out Requests for Proposal. Updating the City logo is moving forward and a local resident will be assisting with the art work. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk James M. White, Mayor Page 1 of 1 I�� Cost for Police Services for long lake �I 400,000 - _ _ _ ___ _ i 350,000 - �,--_ __ ------ ---- - � i �I 300,000 _ - "y�'/ I --_— __----------------- � i 250,000 - ______-----------__�---- --------_--------- � 200,000 �___ _—-— -----_ __ ---------------------__ -- ------------ � 150,000 _^ -------------._ ___�----------------- I I 100,000 - 50,000 - _ _ _ _ I 0 , , , , rn o .� c� m � u� � r� oo rn o ,� c� m v �n � � oo rn o .-� nr m 0o rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� .� .� .� rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I e-1 .-i .-i .--I .--1 �--1 �--I .--I i--I �--I .-i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1989 Contract formula was 15% Population, 35%Assessed Value, 15% Miles of Road and 15% Area (Square Miles). 1992-1994 formula was 25% Population, 50%Assessed Value, 12.5% Miles of Road and 12.5% Area (Square Miles). 1995-2009 Formula was 50% Market Value and 50% Population. 2007 Long Lake dropped one supplemental officer estimated at $75,000 (Reduction of$66,799 from previous year) *2011-2013 are proposed costs. Columnl Columnl Column2 1989 218,065 1990 232,249 1991 239,215 1992 218,970 1993 222,006 1994 222,498 1995 231,083 1996 233,534 1997 239,406 1998 248,850 1999 258,804 2000 266,928 2001 276,752 2002 287,822 2003 299,335 2004 316,255 2005 334,083 2006 353,326 2007 286,527 2008 300,850 2009 302,177 2010 310,000 2011 320,000 2012 325,000 2013 330,000 To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range. MN State Auditor Report City Comparison Tooi -2008 , 350 --_-------------------- ---------- ' 300 ._. -- - -_____ ___ , 250 ' ___ __.._--- ____ _ ----- ------ _ --- -- _ ----_... ---- -._.--- I 200 _�. -- -- - - ------- ---____ __ ___ _ _ -- -- ---- I f 150 -I -- -- -- - - _ _--- ___ -- -- -- -._ __ --- 100 !_ _._. _ _- --- -- __ --- --- — -- --- - _ __ I 50 �, _ _ _ --- - --- -- --- __ __- -._.. __ _ _--- - �Cost Per Capita 0 r- _ _ , �e �a �.a •�� c,e �a aJ �� ,a .�a �ot oa �o t`�- r �,a J tia �a � �a � po �.`� a� �y o o a a j �oc�O �� s1a�aQ��Q��a�o°a o��'a 5'�' \�� c�i-��e�� t��O�c��e i � � \�a� � C� `� ��,o c� �� i L____----___._--- ----------------------- -____- - ----- ---_______--._ ' Cost Per Capita Long Lake 177.08 Mound 203.7 Wayzata 299.91 Maple Plain 233.64 Independena 227.8 Woodland 184.93 Tonka Bay 230.01 St. Boni 105 Minnetrista 288.16 Medina 269.15 Excelsior 235.65 Greenwood 235.26 Orono 320.68 Spring Park 273.53 Minnetonka E 193.68 To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range. May 25, 2010 City of Orono Attn: Jessica Loftus, City Administrator 2750 Kelley Parkway Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Citv of Long Lake Water Svstem At Capacitv Dear Ms. Loftus, By means of this letter communication, the City of Long Lake wishes to communicate to the City of Orono that there is not sufficient capacity in the City of Long Lake water system, as it is presently configured, to accommodate the expansion of future additional water connections as well as fire flow safety requirements to development projects within the City of Orono that would be served by the Long Lake water system. While previous City of Long Lake comments on this subject were more general in the context of the City of Orono's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update and not specific to any development project. However, although a process for communicating infrastructure requirements between the two cities for the current CommonBond proposal has not been evident; there appears to be an assumption on the part of the City of Orono that there is capacity from the City of Long Lake water system to accommodate this proposed development. Such an assumption would not be a correct one. Sincerely, Terrance R. Post Long Lake City Administrator cc: Long Lake City Council City Engineer Dan Boxrud, SEH May 24,2030 WM Extension from Old Hwy 12 and Willow Drive to Common Bond Site Preliminary Cost Estimate Plat No.10-3460 Cost Estimate: Watermain Extension Units Qty $/Unit Total Mobilization LS i $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Traffic Control LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 18"Steel Casing-Jacked LF 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 18"HDPE Casing-Directionally Drilled LF 200 $300.00 $60,000.00 14"HDPE Watermain-Directionally Drilled LF 2150 $200.00 $430,000.00 Connect to Existing WM EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Hydrant EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 14"GV and Box EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 6"GV and eox EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 14"x 14"Tee EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 14"x 6"Tee EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 14"Plug EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 Erosion Control LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Bituminous Street Patch SY 300 $100.00 $30,000.00 Restoration LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Estimated Construction Cost $615,000.00 +5%Contingencies $30,750.00 +25%Legal and Engineering $153,750.00 +5%Bonding $30,750.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $830,250.00 K:V139\139GEN\PLATS\Plats 3400-3499N39-3460 Common Bond\WM Prelim Cost Estimate 5-24-10.x1s a Orono City Council Committee of the Whole May 11, 2010,6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers Present: MayorJim White, Council Members Doug Franchot, Lili McMillan and Jim Murphy; City Administrator Jessica Loftus, Assistant City Administrator for Long-Term Strategy Mike Gaffron, Planning and Zoning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, City Clerk Lin Vee, Attorney Dick Schieffer 1. CommonBond Discussion Attorney Dick Shieffer, conflict counsel for Orono, attended the work session. Discussion ensued regarding the financing alternatives for purchase of the city property for the proposed CommonBond project and concerns, including utilities, raised by the Long Lake Council regarding the project. 2. Comments Regarding Information Updates There were no comments. 3. Other Issues of Current Interest Status of the Police Services Contract with Long Lake was discussed. It was noted Long Lake intends to send out Requests for Proposal. Updating the City logo is moving forward and a focal resident will be assisting with the art work. ATTEST: ��-- �! ��-� � � t,�� ti Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Ja es M. White, Mayor Page 1 of 1