The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-23-2010 Council Work Session Packet ��.s2. Council Work Session Tuesday, March 23, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers AGENDA 1. Long Lake Fire Department Update—Fire Chief James Van Eyll (20 minutes) 2. Comp Plan Discussion—Mike Gaffron (20 minutes) 3. 2485 Dunwoody Avenue Sewer Service Quotation—Tom Kellogg (10 minutes) 4. Police Matters—Ron Olson (10 minutes) 5. Other Issues of Current Interest 6. Comments Regarding Information Updates—Lin Vee (5 minutes) Previous Work Session Topics March 9, 2010—Minutes Attached o Geo-thermal Presentarion o CommonBond Discussion o Emily Program Follow-up o Zoning Prosecution Services o Comp Plan Discussion o MCWD Rules Update o Joint Orono/Long Lake Council Meeting o Police Matters o Miscellaneous-Metro Landscape Restoration and Clean Water Grant;Election Assistance for Individuals with Disabiliries(EAID) Grant;Natural Shore Technologies,Inc. Workshop Proposal;MCWD Long Lake Creek Restorarion Project o Comments Regarding Information Updates February 23, 2010 o Orono Engineering Costs for 2009 o Update on Long Lake Sewer System o Comp Plan Discussion o Golf Event 7/5/10 o Police Matters o Website Update o Update on MCWD Rulemaking Process o Comments Regarding Information Updates o Miscellaneous _ .1 \ptiGtsv Long Lake Fire Department � E � M R g F Serving!he Communflles of Long l,ake, Medina and Orono i��ith Prrde nnd Pro%ssionalism ' "�� lt��j�c� they� I.crc�c�eF~ss a�td �In.S�c.�.� Calls for December Valume 3 Issue 1 02I01/10 We went on 34 calls last month. The breakdown was 1 fire, l0 fire alarms,4 cancelled en-route,9 medical, 1 gas/hazmat/CO,2 car Station and Training Goals for accidents, I vehicle fire and 7 miscellaneous. 2010 Chief's Report Station Goals for 2010 The Officers and Coordinators met on December 29 to create a set of goals for 2010 and to �• SOPs review the goals for 2009. The goals for 2010 are listed to the right of this article. 2. ReCI'UIt�Ret1111 FlI'eflg}]t- ers The question 1 receive quite a bit is how did we do in 2009. I feel the Long Lake Fire Department did an excellent job in 2009. Just in reviewing our goals that we had for the 3. PCep�anS& I11SpeCtlOriS year,we completed die majonry of them. There were one or two that we are still working 4. Tools& Equip List for on today. We are currendy working on Officer Training and SOPs which were 2 goals from las[year. The Officers and Coordina[ors are currently going to a Fire Command class E11$lt]2S taught by Greg Hayes. He is a nationally reco�iized insvucror that has taught at FDIC $. FIIIiS�l MelllOC11� 2010 will be another year of change for the Department but for the better. Look for the 6. Create Special Events changes that will be coming. POS1t10I] Grant to replace Engine I 3-We have not been contacted yet. Round One of the disburse- �• Centeril711�COTTlIII It[ee men[s have wen[out and the rejection letters have not been sent yet So no news is good 8. Fire Prevention Program news. Even if we are not successfiil we need to replace this engine and we will have to Improvement review our options. Training Goals for 2010 1. Pumps Class& Driver Budyet Review for YTD Training We are still working with year end estimates for 2009 budget but it appears 2• �ff C0I'TI'1lning bOth that we were under budgeL I don't think we should ever do that again. lt inside and outside the does look good because this is the first year since Terry Post came here that Departmental Training the Department was under budget but I feel that we should be right at or a 3. More Training with our li[de over budget at year end. We did buy much needed equipment in De- cember and some of it has arrived and some is still in transit. MutuB� f�ld p1t't11e1'S 4. FFI & IlClass The 2010 budget was handed out to the Officers and Coordinators on Janu- S. TI'altllllg II7 oUC COmpa- ary 11. If you would like to see the budget please contact your Lieutenant. nieS. Upcoming Meetings and Assistant Chief of Operations' Report Training Events Recently a group of LLFD firefighters attended a symposium presented 02/01 -Training by nationally acclaimed Fire Chief Rick Lasky of Lewisville,TX,in 02/08-Truck Checks&Meeting cooperation with the MSFDA Region 1 l. 02/10-Long Lake Chamber Meet- ing Station 1 I 100 hours Although Chief Lasky spoke for 8 hours,you thought you where there 02/I 1 -Hennepin County Fire for only a couple. His message is that good.A few of topics Chief Chief s Meeting at Brooklyn Park at 1900 hours Lasky spoke about were: pride,ownership,traditions and the history of 02/15-EMT&First Responder the fire service. .►ust to name a few. Training at 1800 hours After hearing his message I want to encourage you to ask yourself: Do 02/22-EMT&First Responder you take Pride and Ownership in the LLFD?If not,why?Do you re- Training at 1800 hours member how you felt when you first joined the department? 1 do. If 02/22-Metro Chiet s Meeting at not,try to discover that feeling again You might be surprised how easy Jax Cafe it is. Pride in the department,what is it and do you have it? Ownership, what does it truly mean? One example:knowing your equipment and a how it works.Do you know the history of the LLFU?How many tire _ houses have we had and where have they been located? I strongly encourage all of you to go see Chief Lasky next time he I I � �� I�I�� comes to the area,you won't be disappointed.To learn more visit � � �c+v�v.prideando�+nership.com � o After attending Chief Lasky's seminar on Pride&Ownership in the fire `r� � r m � service,I can truly say that I love this department and my fire family. �--� _ . `�_� Stay safe! Chief 2 f 3 k� Long Lake Fire Department �' �.% ,n SerrinR Ihe Commiinrlies of Long Lake, Medina and Orono i��ith Pride and � Pro%s.e innnl ism �; � � w�r,w ��ex„. � �� "S� �� -�� tl�en Ladde�s crnd ��<�,se�� Ca tain 1'I �/��ame 3 Issc�e 1 p 02101/10 Yet another firefighter has died because he didn't use his seatbelt. Please make it click! A group of us went to see Chief Rick Lasky on August 28th. I for one,took a lot from this training. Chief Lasky spoke about managing change, leadership and fire house tradition. If you get the chance to � see him speak, [ would recommend it. As always,there are a bunch of events posted at both fire houses. Please take a minute on the next call to look at them. There are many to choose from. Any help you can give would be great! Big Base was a huge success! It was great to see all the past and present members. It was great to talk to the guy who had badge number l, Dean Nielson. If you see a retired member,go talk to him or her. They have great stories about Long Lake Fire Department. Great job to all that that made this event happen. Mmmmm,pig roast. Lieutenant 12 2010 Social Goals ' Medical calls can sometimes be a complex and difficult situation that can � More Community ln- turn on you as a responder in a second. It is important to understand what our role is in the overall picture of the situation and what are capabilities volvement and publlC are. Understanding that we are just one piece of the overall picture is eduCatlon important to keep in perspective as well. 2, Mot'e soClal events as a Department i.e. Ban- I was reading in Consumer Reports the other day on how many medical quet, PiCl1iC, BBQ... conditions are created and/or are affected by the person's perspective of the situation. The number was somewhere in the 30-40%of overall con- ditions. Where Pm going with this is sometimes when we respond to a call,the best thing we can do is insure the patients that they are in the best of hands and that everything is Iooking good and going well. When we � are nervous,anxious,and unorganized,the paticnt's mental status of the situation will reflect the environment. . ., �, To sum it up,be confident in your abilities and focus on the patient. � Sometimes us�ust bemg there,taking vitals and discussmg the situation � � with them and the family is the best thing. ��/ � �� 2010 Apparatus Goals , Lieutenant 22 1. Equipment consistency Company 22 met recently to discuss our goals for the between similar apparatus upcoming year. We have agreed that an area of improve- 2. Consistence and updated ment at our station would include becoming certified to drive truck check sheets code. During the month of February 1 am going to be spend- 3. LLFD ID tags on all �ng time with people logging their driving hours on the util- equipment ity and rescue. Upon completion of their required hours they 4. Hose testing and ID tag- µ'>>> need to test out with either captain 21 or lieutenant 21. ging We have also started a"tool of the month".This month Chris Adams chose the gas powered fan. It will be his as- signment to give a short presentation on the proper usage, limitations,basic maintenance,fuel type and of course safety �—� �_=:— � considerations. We will be meeting once a month for about � �)J � _ � an hour or so to go over the"tool of the month" 7J�� 1 look forward to working with everybody and serving �..�� ,,�—�' the LLFD as lieutenant 22. Thank you ' � � O � " ' � � �� , �� ; � � � � � � � � ,� � N N � � � �^ •Q � � � � N � �� 5. � . 'f :w+Yty �` � �V � '�` � . � � �' � � � � i� :� 1 y"� '� � •+v � ' � � , g � 's ,� �� , � 5� � � � �' � � `� � � � .ri��' 4 , , � � � � � � �'.t :�, , .u ., � � .,�. 4 �; � a�� _ , " � � �� <a ' � �� =;. '...:,�. ", " � � � � ,�`» �� ;� ,��ati� `;�x�r 3� : �� z�.x� � �,,�*'�� ,�,�� "'n .�� y'��' " �"�,' �� '� , �� , �� f , ��. - ,�* ,.x w�. �` � ,�'�'' .c <,; �;`` � � 4 v � '� � � �k�� . ��,�L�;3bl�.yx`�t` � f.:. Y y. . ��e ,`nY��...',�'k^P T +�ti � � � � �`�'�S��c�" ��,�E � � �� ,. �>, � �-�� ` � � ��V _\ � � � � � ('-� �� ;� ��.� �� ' �,� �: � � � • �7 �� + �� N � � � � `� v � � �� o .,� O �..�, ��#� �, �� w � � .� '�,� '� y � � c� � � ��„ �� , � � � � � ` „,, � �� Y � "��`'��'*�.�"�'sh'v�CF � /� � � V ' i ;� ' xi a � � \I� w � . � � �\ ` � '`�,� hk'�w . � � � t '�`(� .�^ 'a' � . �� Yu.'" �` � � . 4 � 3l��' •1 �. •� . *v4yb'4 �,+� .u�� :, "�' � •� � � � � � '�L` �" � � A . .. � r � � � .�� E'�,. r �� , ` � ��, �� T— • � �$` �, �f�` 4�.'Ct 3�*� � �1I � � � ��. �kxy,, i".�F � � � � � � � 7� t � d:��'�.,��i` �� \..� .�,�-�+. � ` .,� Y�w�� T�1 . . ��1� � � � /� ��.s �� 11V � � � �� . . \^ "�YI/ � r�� "5. �� ;r yti �. � .. � ��V � . y � � � � � . � � � �� Y��x�� ' � � � ...� .q..P9ti� ��t � � A �i .� � � . S t �'�a, a�"�� . '. . ,� ,i��`�� i�1J �7 �i a `, ��R # � x., . u.... � ' T ...: � �_` �/� � � . �1 ( ]/� T� '�.�` �� '�.' �. � �` � '� � � ,i�� vj .. �. � �� y �� j� ��, a„ � � *,`t+�s ��`� � j � � � �� ; , . � , � � � �� Q� � *� � � � ' � �� _ wy �Y' � � � � ti� � � � � �, � � �� ; � ,o � �,,� $ �� . •� p� o ,,� �y �,, � � q � � � . � � � �� :�� : . � � _�., , ��r� � _ r �_ .�� . � � ��"�� , � �� V � 4$�Y . , �� b�T+ . �� ..� �'.: ••�� . .. # � � � � � � �� F',. � � � � �� . � ��II 'f_. � � . � � � � M • � .��"� rw.��^'r ��' � C"a � � �4 � . ^� CU � �� u�� "k 4-+ � �� . y ". �. �� ' ? � � �� O ��,r� � � �y �� •�u,V >� ��Y� f..k.� } � � � �� }�— ` . � $ � 1 � � �� •� ,� Q3 � O �, � �. � �� ` ��r� ,� N �� Q� �"� .� �"'' ��{ � ��,' � ,�j � � �� { �� '�� h� � � � � ,�5 � �� ',�..��_ ,� .,�� A `.. � � �h�a ��` � . . �-� � � � � �,,,� � �,, � 7 � � �.zTf:�^� � � � � . � � "*.�. 3L�N r'� � . �� o 0 � �a � o� � �"�.� S+A ..:"t� f� ' �� . . � . �� , � �i � � R '� �� t" � x x � { _F �::� o �, s ��'� �r (�`'�(^' � �^` l •'1� � . ,� � . � � � _ V � v • � . . r= �w � ,�� `s� E,'� �` ��'�. A d `�'�1 •a` •� � �h ��`n x ,'�� . �11� �� . � � � � � � � .e.��'a�.�-+'�,^.q��;;�`��``"�"r a: x��' . . v�� ' ��t�„ " �at �` ��. '*� #�u-. � ��.L&*.r. � � � ♦�V � r�11� � :4�' .*4� 7;�m. .T?��l �„ N \�f !� � 1 � � = � `�', '"'' '''*� :�� 4 .y��P ,}F �a.� $ �p"}S . . :-. ,,.'�� ;'��`�� . - . ,LL � � � � � � � � � � � , �� :� � . �. .. ,�. �.� �� : � 5 �. *^ ki ��'��fi� ''� '� �� "� ��m�rc z.r��:�,.,��.�Z`3a�.; L... . . . . . . � z �� "t:,v,,:-�-'�*.�:x �..;..,��... ,� ..�...�e';, . ...:' � �'. �. _ .. '+.a=� � .�;. �� x �� ; �" �� f � � �� > �`� �`� ' '� �� = � � � � a_ - � ; � � �,� ,. ti°� � � �, � � � � �� ;� �� o �1 � � � � i � � '� � .� � •�,,, .��''' +.� ''� � � � � � � � � � � ,,,, �� c� � � � � � � � ° �� '�W„� � t �� -�� ,, �� i �� x �, ��` ^� ��'�"�" � � V � � t U}1 f'e` °'� `t`�t; ` � � . . . ,y �� i � � ..� � � � � . k i'`�a.�� -.�' � � . 'S� ..`k°'�*� � �.. a� � . �-r ; � k''L c� . � .- , '� }�� '.,�,� t .��"'`"�; . . � i T •1�a � � .�^� ��`� ''ti ' �' . �y . t � r'`� r..��"x�� •�'"�� Tw � '�1 a,��'� a� .r }� fs► �'�` `j s.� '" � � �/.. . � •� v �� T� � � � � i, �� . r '5 �E x � � � � � � ` ^'�'� � � � � �� ,�. � � �� y�� *� � 1,,�� o o � � � � ��""�,�,� � i� � � � � `Iv � ��.�� Q� �� , �� -� �� , �F�, � '*►� 'rv ��2� �� v ''�v `�,v .� � � � �� ` �'�� ►�'�� ,,� CJ �� y� _ ��` �� •�"�� . � �iv �iv � � '� t�`�'v� �� , � � � � � � �� r, � .� �� , �� ,,� � �..� � � � � � � F �" ,,� ,,� • �.:$ �,j"� rv ,� •�,y �'*��' `'�a � � .� r�•� � � � �i � � �� " �• . � � •� v � . �..,. .� ,_,. .. � . .._, � �,.,� �� __ � _ � �. �.: � 3;; , �; , 3'�=. ,�z �� _ � � � � : :� �- �� '� �� , .. � � �...�� `��`��'°� _ , .,� �'�� ,� �,.��,. � � �� _ � .,w. x -.,. �.. e.,. �� _ � �� {��, x �� `�{� ��r �; �" ��",� � �i � ., �__,, � . o �. �, �* �v — . � ��;�v,i ;; W r ,�,,, ,. �� I y:, ::: ; <;�";,; ""�, �,. �i�Is �� rv;. �. � � :�� #° : ��,: � �. � � � s�: �� ,� '` r �v , . , < ...o.�.- ....�.� � �. . . ' �'��' p�yr^.,� . '�w �� z ��q �"e " -��`h�� . .�-c�"�. lrrn "� 'S'.+�+.a,� � $�.: � �',�' �Er ��.Nl. ` @LS' ... . ..g. . . . . .... . .,, �„- . .. .. . .. .:��. w r,..a.a'^,..: st� _ .:=.: , "�..... �. �:p d� ��` �� . . � . � � �+,. �� . .. , � . � , . � ` � Y . �, �. . . � "-�nd's3e'uE��'E"I- �c.ev3,w� ,..� �� `' r S� � �' � n�3�A+R ��a.� 'w.$4 � y,� e� � �'�t . t..>4'�n a . � 3... � . ' ,, s: .�..� .,.�... � � ` i �;y_1�� E4 '�`S`U�`�? ` � � �-. . . � � 5,<, , -- , .... �.,.,. ..,. �fi�L� 5h y . � � , _,, ��':�� ,,. w � r - s; �- � . e ,� .�,��.�� . � �'�s�„�^,�� ` `��o-' �� tn x �� _ - � � � ' ��,� }t ��; : �� `.i F , • � �� Y� „;� ?:� �. � ��:�� i „ , r � �� . : -� � ,� .w. �, ,Y, .,,�.� �7� r�� 'i.+, v � � �------ - __ '� `.1 E 4 „ -, �` 4'v �'",aF; ��.�""4Tm�.{ \ ��'�'�.�3� ' � �' .`£ w ,� , ... ,. . � ^ � :- � � ,.... . �rr.b- „ � � i4�� x�� '.. � �� "�� `� *ifr ; 4 �'�` ��.�'`s ; yU°F`.� �'"i�w.. . ��n �, � £ � . � . . \, I � .- S�, �.$` . ei*a- .: �a€ �xs�L � �.�� . . t}� ...�� . _. .. T`� 's,�,� y..a�, . , . �� a� ��: : � s�� " � � � `� A �,5 ��fi'x� '�� ''�� »::'l�k , . �.tP �„ � . � . �� 4� � 1 � � �� . . � . .. ,t�S:.'sE�.' . � §�.� �� : ... . . . n.`�'�� "�;��.t �'S • � . . �e i '�'a .�,` �� } � . � � � �� - � � � • �,�� .,� Q� 4.� .�.< • �,,� �J �-=, � 4 � '''" � e, � � � � � 4� � , 0� �` �' � � � �, .,�`� W �.. �`' � ; cy � �� + � � � � � ,� . g � � � �, 4�► �� '� -�:� p� � ` � �� ,.� �,,,,� � � � � � � � � � oa � � Q 3�� v � � � r '� �` �, � c '`� °� � . _ � � � � �� t1�� +-� ..� �' �; �,,.., v� � �� x �"" . rt ��a� � �,� Nr� � �`"�f� ;. a � , �� , ,�� ' �� .��"�._ � i�t ��,�� ',�" , � � �� y � J �� a� fi } _ 4-�"'*,�; '�%. y- �105�i� � � �� ro-�` '��'�` � ^�:`�`t� ' � �-�*�'"�� y�;�� . . �.a '" :`r �,i:,�;. •:jY . . � . ,,, :"y.;." �ti� �,;3i �"��, . . T=T". �;i , ..:.. '��' .x�$� ` �, 4� K � � `yi� ""v.'��, 'i s� n�*�., . ��a t ,;�� x fl`.��3 r�z... '� �, s,' � . ..;�J��:"� �' L� n. GS� � } # �� §''�:.�� ' . . . .. � \. � �,,=4� _ � .. . �� ita ��§R�,��Al . �,�� s .. . � . . . � •�.. : .. � � �. � w� � ' ::ro $ �! ? �: . � � � �� . � �/V � . . � � � ��. ,.� � . . . �� • '" 3�. � ` � � n\ :', �.�c^ � � � . . � .,w"�'.�r."r'� � �� ti/ � :�� w f� � � � �� v� �� t� � �� : � � . a � � - � ,. -� � �� ;�� ,,� � �� N. �� , � � � � � � � � � �� o �� o � � � � � �� _�� A4 �fl W �� . � �� `� ��'�� ° � . �� .�m- �, 1 �..:�� [�� s , `k -!,}2t 4 4, y. 1 . 'C.. %.�^Y�.. ��L'�; �p i'j, t^; '":§ Pd� i. � � � ` � � ` ` _ � � ,� ` � � ` � � � � ` • , ` � � ;3. � & W� '� S`c'��' � � � '�.'�. � 3�n k�� 4 � a�� # }"r �, �� +�,��.`� .��-�`y�b k.� n" ��:. �t�� >� ,t'�-�� '�� ` � . �� w 4}�;`�� ',�f�'� �i.�: � s�',�� . ��i�c : �g� ��'"4�� r .»� at �:,�� ,� �� a `��x.� ` .�� `..�� ! + � �� -_ � , 1.. > � V�'''� �� ', I�i,�,, .I'!, � rr► � � � � � � • � � ` � � ` � � �, t • �, • • ♦ � ` • � � {. � ��'��' ��, "x'�t�4 f�, t h.�� .�+¢ k� ��.°�R 'k� Y.'a�x�$ �� '�x �z.`w.� a;�, , i� �t` r �� N �k�}.:.;H�.� '�� i� � g tN c Ty � `�r �� Y, }, �S .�, � w�.. . . . � � .�?�` �¢ '�,�a.`� ��.c� ��'�'�^E� ,`�:'��..�3 �� .�z�� .T'� � � _� :�rt �" --a _ �� . � �� . � , � � � � � ' � �. � � � � � � � � i� � � � � � � � � � � � �� ' "*�a � � „ � � � � •� � � E � � ; '.:a: N � � �' � t � � � ; .� ti ,+� �^+ � �.L,, �'`' '� N' �R ; � �0 � � � � .a4 ^� � � �y "N `i ` � � �� - � � � � � � ? V �,�, � �' � t�,� � O 'v �"1 � ��, �"'; � ,� � � � ~ � �, � Q� q �, •°�. � ��'' �. C.� � � �� °' � � � o � � � �� N � •� o �,a. '� '� � � ,� � � � ;� ;� '� ;� :'" �" � � � "� � �+ v �� '�'� � � ,,,�, � •� �x � � ►� � � �, � � � �� , � � :� � � �. '� � � � .. � � o � �� : v �u o � c� � � �i � � � � � �, � � �.1 � � °�� ' I �` � � 000 � o � oor°�',, � *'� Q� � � ,� �q �O � N N c,C�y � t�y � � ,o I l � I I i � � ` � ' l 1 � ; � �.,�,,, cy �.,, cy �.,,, t�j *� M ch � N � � . �:- �� *�„� *�,, "� � �, '� ''�, `�� '"'�, *'.� � j , .� � �; �,.�. W � � [� C� � � �� ;��. �; �. c. , , � � ' � c „_, � � � �' h_ � , ,�. ti ua"�, .�. � .�,� � . . . .. � �� ""� � � + � � �: � � r �� 3�� . a� � �� ,}+�,,"�.�, �.-;-.�" . ��`ae.. 4; � � . x � � �,��i�..t`�� .� ^'�+.�� . � . . � � s ' �.r� �. ?t �$.x x� ��".,�'��`�' ,. � � �... � � � �� : � � �> � � �'�� ,_ � � � < ��> �.-. 4i ��R�li��'<�� .. .�. i . '�3k+us ��' ' ` � � . , . � � �'� ��: `��'x i�`" � .. � . � �1� � � . `ti � �"�'�-� � � �E'=... . !WJ .. �}V :',.. .. . � qa •� �._ � ��` •� � �� • �� 'H �� . �� . � � � � � � k . �� r� �� o � c� � � � o Q � � • °�' ��x ,o o � � �� r�,� r`,'� �, . �� _�� . � '.� �� "� �� '� �� ;. �C�.. ,"� � � �,, Q � �` O O � � � � ti � ' � � ` �'� � �V ` � q , M 4 � � �.: '� �= u.� O t�U O C� . Q �� c= 'N � � � � cy' ., ,� � �- � � �� r � �� T ,:� v,,, '�'`1 ''"'� � � � � �1 W w �i ;Y :�� ,, �� ::,�;:� � , : _ � r< _ � � ; �� ..��. �� : �� : � �. �� ., � � �� . ., +1" 'rr ,,.... . , i� ^ ' _,.,. ::._ � � _� ;�� , � ,�� ,��:.: ` .� � �.�� x�� ;��`: �� '�'� �� '.� ��: �� ';<�t. _` � �: e.a, � k-��. .��r' . `t.. ,.w. '� _ � � ' � � ' ' � �� :.�, " ��F � < ��,=�� ;_�' �';-. �� "' �� ;:;,,�: �,�, 'k`i �mM ��v i�' �v� 'v j � � N� P+ ' 0 L. - . <� � m - � �a> �� '�� `'�� . ; • �, E� �` �� ; ��i� � �, t� fi t u ,.. a„ '`�;;; ,,, , �� ,,. . .. .-_.� . .:. ��_, t��, � �..:�. ri. ,�. ., � �. w ar " . . . . .. . . . �� .a,��", . . xr <•- • �� - u�a..�? �� , _: � �� t�� $ � � . . . .,+fi .x: "` �s �x�,� � a�r"'`�-- '� . � ':.�,, � � � ��. �, ..; � � � � � ,, ,, � � _� � � ;�. � � �K�: �� , :� d* "�I fi � � � � �� ... � _ � � � 0 �� .� � `� ` �:� o .5 � w � � Y Q °* o "y� a� ��°� ,�; ".� � �i � L" 1 � '�" �_ __�; � � ��i � w._ �y '' 3 � y � V a v "� s 6 �'� � � ' �� " y p1 y � � � ;�L7 , .i, vi 7�, � f�, a►� "w �► c.7 � U � G�7 U W a°.� A r� � °�v "� ' � � :�: : . ;� �� _ : '+ . ,�m.F 3.�, r . , � ,�. I � ` .�� x. � e .Y� �. : �� , . � , . � s � � % }� � F� '��'; -Riw�;�.`> i' y �, �� 'o tl ��r�`,�' �� sd� �I � 8�� ' ��9��'jj#o�;�pP" 9`�,' �� { ��ay � �� i� � �� e :.�, � � � � .� �.� �§��r��+f�s's }�� ',a � � . � j �� 4a�J{�� . .... . e t'�� t�� if� ��,s= . � } i�� 'i tf�f'��I . .Y��3i'�+F� � � . ��3_d ti ' a� � ��: �, � �`*;`y s t�. . . ��' � � � ��,� � —�r .. , _ . � � n .� _w � hw,.; . .�� ke _ �° � ��. � � �� . ,— � �r: , . �� .$- �� F. � 3 � � i � �� O � `� � '� �' � � � � � '.� ° o� o � � � � o � . �, �� t�_'` ��`�_ �•,�,� "'� �.: � , � *� . � � � � *{. � � 4.1 � � � p °' � � � � + ,� • �, .,��, � � �o � � � o � � � � � M p � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4� D � � � � � � � � ti � 3 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � C� � � O ti � "� '� ,� � `'`'� O � � � � ., � � � � � � O � �, \ o Q _- � cy "'� r.� c� ; '�.�. �� `� o � : � , . v � . . t . ��" d t $'��^.i i*` . k: .zi; ..g.i��-. . �. " .: :� ,n k s � � f;t t,ov, s.. . ._ . .. ..« ., . .. "`• ?v�3. :.,x, . . , ' . � .. � . . . �:�?':"L.' . . ..� . . . . ;�. � ': .... �, �. . . .. cb �� 3 � ��"� � t �,��' `� . <,�`,. �'�`�i � . . . ... � �. � � `�;.� �3 's�''�� `�',� .. . .. ... . .. . . . � '�� ' ;� . � .. ... . � . . .. �.n�"� �, . . �� i �� . . . � S � ��`�` ��` k9 P;.' � n � �� `� N � O r+�1 . � .. . ��, �� . �a �.�a �+�- > �. . ��1� /�� . . ,. �;�'s� :`� � = � � � �iI 4/ � . . � �� `� � � � �� . .. . . +� •�*1 ��3 �' � t�.. }f y' f 1 \�•�� y �:1�� '� � � � � �� a� �� , � �/�� x *W Ir"\ ii < ;'� ��.,�, �.iN � .� . �� , � � . ��','�k �k,, Wn F . � �i�+�{ 1�� •f�l �A ,� '� ,e��.5 ��' �� 7'�nl � ... � ' � ;: ��,�"..�,ri� t ��35.; , � �� . �� 'r ,��: '� . � � � ��:' ��' *� 43 • �� ., � �� . e. � � �° ,�y , � ,�; � � �, .,� r,.,; ��`� °' '� �� , ��,�� A �� ` � p., � . � � � . � � � � �� ~ .� � Q .� � �+ 'b� d� �,. � �� 4� � '� �� ; �.,� �. � .: ,�. �� . : � �. � ,�. . . . � 4�.;. � �'.... � /�Z.. "� � , . V/ �; : � � � � � � a .��y A ` ! w. 4 �� a � •w � ;� � �' � � � � � �� " � � c�v �., T� % � � �_ � E�'�+ "� � O (.� .� .� . �� ..� � �:, x _ � �:; �: ,� � �� ,� .�a�� _., , . .. , ;u� 4 �* f . . y��., ,. . � . �� r� i a '� '1%�.,� � � � h; � � � � � ..� .� �� ^ � �:� "� y�-.^�,: � . .. � � : . �� z. Q � � .�� O � � � ' � _} � � �� p � � � � � �, � �� ` �. � � � � � �o '� c.� '� ,,� '� �„� #.� Q � � � �� r., � � �� .,� � � � � v� � � � `_ C� � � � � �� 3 � g �. . . /^�`�..�' � � ` Y ;'� �. � ti��. Ss'��S'�.3 �' \1 l � . � ; �� t�,� x� '�Yr" ��'�=�� "t " 1Y/ � � � ;� �a:, +'� � .. � "�-. t � ��\. � M,��, � �. "i �� . � . �� ti '� . � �� . . .. � � � �� '� l � � •'� ,� �+ 4 � � � '� ::� ��_� � � � �� c, � � � � � � � � � � � � I o� � �' °� � � . � � � o � � `�, � �� . � o � °' � .�, � � � � � � � .� � � � o � � `� � � . � � � � � �� '� �� b�0 � � o� °' � •� � � � � � G�� '� �,, � � � � . �O � '� � � , �� w �j ��, � � � �,��, Q � � � '� �� : : 4�: � � (,� ,�,,,� *,,,,,,,� � � � � �,,;� � , �1,, ,� ,,N � � �� F, �, � � � � � � � � � �T � � .� � � � � o� � ,.�.4 �: x. c� ,, ►� •� ,,�, � � � � � � F � ��. � C� � .� � � ,, �„� 4 � *� � , � � � � '� � 'N � � q� � � ,.,x � . _.. ��.. � . °� � ` � � � *�l .,�r.� _�.�; _ �� ,T: ��:..-� ,,.,. . e � .. .�. �:, . . y4.:. r2.. �� o�, i., � . _{� 1.j _±*' �da ��.��, ... .. �� ,„ 1C Fmh :�'�'$iy�� ^�' 'y # � . ��=,..k � 2.„�.�;'z.� R"�k : 'i P34 �2�2 "tt'. -2"'A.Y' k %z€= � �yi 4Y a ,��.�$ +.. . . � � �� "° �'z� ' � ' ' �. �� < �� ,r, � h � +��, .�E�,�y�� ''�� h.�Y��s� `�iyY'k0d�'�e . . ��A � ,y,� 5 , � .� ,�� . +�'" ��`.ta� *ws �h.. . � � � � �� . ,�� v � o � � � - �, o� �. o � �, :� � � � �� .�° � � .��,,, � � � � � �., � ��, . �� o �, � �v� � � �� v �� s�= � � � � � c� n� � � � o � � .,,�� ° ` �, c, .,� � `'� . � � � � =� '� �, � .� � �� ,� �rt � � � � �� .,� � �.� � �� o� � � � � � � � � � � • � c� � � � .� �7 � .,� � .,,,, � . � � �, �� , - .� � . . ,� � - � �� , a. � � � fl ,� 4� � � x , � � � , �� •� o) � ,, � c� � .� � � � � � � ; �- o `''� � �,. V � � � � , �� _ - �� . _ �� t. {. �; � �` g C �`��t ��`�` �.'"�, �-.. . . ��,.��^��' ��« � ' � �,�•,� !� �� ` ' � � �� ;�-, � � � x � yV � � � � � � �' � � � � � c� � � .�., � �� .,� �. � � � ° � � � � - � � � � � �"� � � �, � � � � �, � .� � � � � � �o �, �� # -� ��_'��.� . �� .. �w , � � � � � � �� r ��,. ,�. , � � t'V .� � � ti�,� � � � � . '� �� '�'+ `�,,,�. �,,,� � � � ,� ,,,a � �, � �, ,o � ,,� : , � 4� ,� � ��, � `� � � ° o � ° � � � �''' �} � � � , a� . � c� � � � �y � � � � � � � � � �' � •� '� � � � � �� Q� �� .� -�� ,�' � � � ,� � �� + p � � �;�� .1 � �,,, � � � �..� a, � r,. � , . � F�� . �t . �.o- . s � a � � ��u �:��°� �n �� h � � � � �� -�} �� t �� t;� �,,��r : �� , � � � �>. n r � *�.��a y � � - � , . . � ��"' r�� . . � � � . . r��,�t'��y �� ,, w�'��`� �, �``'`� � , � �2 t �` v�; P,�" �� A�� x� E '. � _\ ' � . '3 3' ` l� � �i 1 � 1 � ,,,�� ,; � � 3 ��ka � �'c . �, �� u � � �� ,R ts4� .. � � �� .. ' ,� C� ;�, {� �"''" � � � � � � .,,,,, � � � O �� t�� t� � � �`'�'� �� - � ��., � '�� C� � � � r � ��, � � `� � V , � � � � � �: L � �j �► �� O �v ��, � '"'� � 0 � �-,- � � � � Cl. � �. .,., � �� i. � O �.�..� � ,�s .� �... �� c� ._ � � � ,� �� -� t� � � � U � ,� � tr� �,-- . �,.. -.. �, � -.., �:� � �.. � v � cr� �- � cv * � �iy : � q� cu cU ,— � � c� ° � � c�► � C� � -. c� �. �� .�� .�.., � � �„�� ` � f`,`. `. ; � � � � � �!�' � . `7 ��: �,� � � �� C� �- '� t� � �� x�� -��_ �� m (� n v (� � Q � �'�� `�� 5.., � � �I.,r �•• Q �.� ;��,��,.�� Vr/ � � . � " v ��`,�r�� , :,��;,,�� `�*!�., .� � ., �� . � , :, � �� z ,� , ��,� ,�. , ,, �..�. . , � � �� ' __ °T �"��``�� ``�� ` ¢�� .� � ,�� ^'� . n. _ .' a'.-y...-� ....z,.«� . a.: ��h, �A3 r� ��:. �� . . .. . . .. . }r:'`.. �..��;, ;,�� . ._..,,:.._... . . .�.:';a.. . *.'�"��r �,��. ,� '�' « �. < r.�.fi 3� F i¢ ��, . . ..:tv"'.,.,� t :e; � ��•: "� �...-�z�'� " . .. �- � ; ; � , � � � � � � � = � � 1 � �� .. -� � �' �. � � � � � ,o � � � � o � 'Q � . �' c� �' — , ,c� � � v � � � � � � � � � c� � �� ._ c.� ,� � �� -- o v — � � � '''' .� .� �. �� ,� �, � � �, � � . �� ... p cu � � � ,� � c� � � . S* ,� t� r- � '� ,� � � ''�• � � "•,,., � � � •v �, � � � � Q. �. � � � �,,� E,,y �. � -� ,�, a' � � U � � � �, � •- .� �, •� y.. � . � ,c� � � -, �.... .� - R � � '� ''".. � h� .�� ; �� t- � ��, r ,z��; � . . . . . . . . .. . �, ._•._ ..�..,. . ni?tet@ 'p�.; . .�'� a.i , Y,�<�.: ( e e.�:_ i .� �t � 3 � � �� : ,� � }pok yfi' t;PEf s ARV��'��{`{ .p 7 �� k �„°i � �t�'u�c;�2�a�f��)fP��4'i��t;u : e�„"% ! " '& i a4 %t. ;�e; g,, ��a� { a3s �a �� ,,,� �� ,�� .�� a, ��, �� "�; r �. ;� �, } �� " �� ,. �� . �.�:. � � � �.. �'. °a�r:_ � � • ` £�� : �� c � � � � �` '�„ ;", � �`'�� `` �� : � " t� . a'^ p �, k y�r �' ��a �' �. �a� �k ��, �v� � ��'` �°�.€ r.�' c �s'�a�e � � �� y ',a ti�� . '��'^. �,.a� x��` `� ..,,�, ,,:�_�u � � , �, , , _q.. . „.�.. �� ,.�. -•_— t : .. : { �. - , . ,<w<�. _:,. ,:s;,ava..r .. �"' .. ��-. . .� . . . .. , �y, � �.' a �.fig�s� � , ' . w �� r: k � !r4r: L 'M Ay�y �`...' ti� ` .�e+.v..... 's : � �'� .� .-'�'. ' �. � �� '" �: < � ��-��''�� ; :�. x.�', s�� , .�_� ,�' � � � � � � a 3 ��:��2" ��'��4�� .,`,�`v�' ��''� :�� N � ... �. 3�� ,.,x '� �. py"-a, pl y� � `.`-- ----____. � �� ;,_ � , _ , �/ '�/i �� r �%a o��, i� , � :��- ; �� CITY of ORONO �,, � , r,�.� �, � � �r�',,, � �, '��„ !4 Municipal Offices �� , ��,� �dy� �i; ��.� " � �' ,�G/' Street Address: Mailing Address: V��t'EgKO�'�%' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66 ,_ �= — Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 PRESS RELEASE CITY OF ORONO MARCH 24, 2010 Notice of Open House and Public Hearinq City of Orono 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan Wednesday April 7, 2010 at the Freshwater Center, 2500 Shadywood Road Open House 5:30-7:00 p.m. Presentation and Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. The City of Orono 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Community Management Plan or"CMP") is in its final stages of completion. Updated every 10 years, this document is the City's guidebook for all land use decisions, and it details the community's intent for all facets of City functions and facilities. The CMP includes chapters regarding Community Philosophy; Parks, Trails and Open Space; Transportation; Sewer and Water Systems; Environmental Protection; Housing; Land Use; and Public Services. While the 2010-2030 CMP is essentially a re-affirmation of Orono's long-standing philosophy of land use policies for preserving Lake Minnetonka and the City's natural environment, there are minor changes proposed for a small number of properties. In the Navarre area, a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. are proposed to be re- guided for "Mixed Use". The Mixed Use designation would allow for the possibility of higher density multi-family residential developmen� such as senior assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment. In northern Orono, a few selected residential properties abutting new Highway 12 have also been identified for re-guiding to allow increased residential density. An Open House and Public Hearing have been scheduled for April 7 to allow interested citizens an opportunity to review and comment on Orono's plans for the next two decades. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Asst. City Administrator Mike Gaffron at 952-249-4600 (mgaffron(a�ci.orono.mn.us) or view the draft Comprehensive Plan on the Orono website at www.ci.orono.mn.us. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us �� o� , � ; a o '� � C ITY of 4RON0 � � r�� ' �+ ' \�i�,, � � ��I � ti Municipal Offices �`� ��'�� 4�� Street Address: Mailing Address: �;,l�q g,�,;;. ��E3H0 2750 Keiley Parkway P.O. Box 66 � — Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Notice of Open House and Public Hearinq City of Orono 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan Wednesday April 7, 2010 at the Freshwater Center, 2500 Shadywood Road Open House 5:30-7:00 p.m. Presentation and Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. Dear Orono Property Owner, The City of Orono 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Community Management Plan or "CMP") is in its final stages of completion. Updated every 10 years, this document is the City's guidebook for all land use decisions, and it details the community's intent for all facets of City functions and facilities. The CMP includes chapters regarding Community Philosophy; Parks, Trails and Open Space; Transportation; Sewer and Water Systems; Environmental Protection; Housing; Land Use; and Public Services. While the 2010-2030 CMP is essentially a re-affirmation of Orono's long-standing philosophy of land use policies for preserving Lake Minnetonka and our natural environment, there are minor changes proposed for a small number of properties. You are receiving this individual notice because your property is proposed to be re-guided for higher density residential uses, or is within 350' of such a property. This re-guiding is in response to Metropolitan Council requirements for providing suitable areas in each community for workforce and lifecycle housing options. In the Navarre area, a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive, are proposed to be re-guided as "Mixed Use". The Mixed Use designation would allow for the possibility of higher density multi-family residential development such as senior assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Actual development of such uses on any given property would not occur until a developer applies for and successfully completes a formal rezoning process during which there would be ample opportunities for public input. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently guided & zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but some existing commercial property could be converted to higher-density residential use or mixed residential-commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects through a future, separate public hearing process. In northern Orono, a few selected residential properties abutting new Highway 12 have also been identified for re-guiding to allow increased residential density. The attached maps indicate the properties in Navarre and along Highway 12 that are proposed to be re-guided. We encourage you to attend the Open House and Public Hearing to review what Orono has planned for the next two decades. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Asst. City Administrator Mike Gaffron at 952-249-4622 (mgaffron@ci.orono.mn.us). Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us CMP Part 3B - Land Use Plan 3-23-10 Revisions Summary: Note: For this section, the first attachment shows the proposed NAC revisions in underline/strikeout format. The second attachment shows the final language, which includes a few additional revisions by MPG for clarity or to accurately reflect all the intended changes. The page numbers below refer to the NAC revisions set. P. 3B-10: Revised text acknowledging wider options for higher density P. 3B-11 thru 13: Population and Households Forecasts revised to match Met Council Systeins Statement forecasts (text and Table 3B-1); text revised to reference new Mixed Use areas in Navarre. P. 3B-19: Revised text on P. 19 regarding appropriate locations for higher density and mixed use development. P. 3B-21/22: Text revised to note changes identified in plan will change the Urban and Rural Area boundaries (only change is adding Eisinger property on Hwy 12 to Urban Area). P. 3B-28 thru 33: Land Use Capacity Table 3B-2 is removed, as is reference to it on Page 3B-28, and replaced by new Table 3B-2: Existing Land Use. Table 3B-3 Existing Land Use is replaced by a new Table 3B-3: Orono 2030 Planned Land Use. Tables 3B-4a thru 3B-4e are eliminated and replaced with new Tables 3B-4a: Summarv of Proiected Households; 3B-4b: Forecasted Emplo,yment; and 3B-4c: Net Densitv of Residential Development (the one that gets us over the Met Council hump). P. 3B-33-34: Revised descriptions of the residential land use categories, to incorporate additional categories. P. 3B-3� thru 38: Revised all elements of Table 3B-5 in re-describing the development parameters for the five Highway 12 area Parcel Groups. I have made a variety of additional changes not shown in NAC revisions; I suggest you read the second attachment to see the final version. P. 3B-40: Added item 8 to list of challenges for development of the Navarre area. New or Revised Maps: Map 3B-1: Urban & Rural Areas Map 3B-5: Existing Land Use Map 3B-6: 2030 Land Use Plan Map 3B-6a: Planned Development Sites Map 3B-6b: Navarre Area Mixed Use Sites Map 3B-7: Highway 12 Areas Guided or Proposed for Multifamily i f A B a800 MOp <00p � 3600 � 3200 E 3800 F 2100 � 2000 � 1600 � 1200 � P00 K 400 � 0 12a0 —�200 SIX�N E C R� 1 , r � , 2008 Defined Urban and Rural e� A� _ Areas Q -800 —b � z war r w. �� v � � - Z City of Orono °°°- �w `„ " __ \ � ` �L0 Minnesota H N.S.R -400 c „� cavcrwee 4,� 3 � N ! � lQ9 a 0 0 ��f w�rz�u a — ��Defined Rural Areas 9 �]Defined Urban Areas � ,�,o --qpp �Recreational Trail py o y�� gmmw p o L�Railroad Right-of-Way 5 �y �Parcels S 5 �o ��Open Water 800 5 (N CJN p9- 800 OSP n�r nxw uRc � 6 My I 6 �uh � 1xJa 4 I 1200 � � M1 ' � � ] 1600 � � l�, — ,. , � '� N , , � B � � ' � �s.,�,.a„u � w � , 8 � 9.�v ' \ � 2000 I i�i."r� � AmVNSITAVRA \ ` 1 I z� ) RBBACN � � � _ _ �i/ 1 I � �`�'" � � 9 0 3000 6000 eran�v � � �� PARI[ � Z"0° � ii`��` — � J � Z,� Scale in feet � ��'� �'° � �, � �u / i �o `'"`" `""�. " , �:s�.'Y � "_0�� / � / 'o ��¢ �O\�� z� � �,. _ a ,�..�,. � , ze� „ ::,;.. �Bonestroo i 0 � � ��'�t��',}.,.r,i y�/ u L / ` _ _ — _ �,'.+qK�" i � � >> i 1200 MAP 3B-1 \ r —3200 9800 q H00 g qppp �� 3600 p 32�1 E ]BOp F 2900 � 2000 H 1600 � 1200 � 800 N qpp � 0 R.�Wew.�i�suu�.tB��op i r ._--_. _-.- ______. . __ —__ _ -- . _. - _ _ . .. _ ��n��■ � C�� wn�� au�u��r��n�u' n . , _, � .�..,,..�. ,. ..,...�1.��.�..�.. I � � rJ�� e � �a+- r.f ��' ,'��` ��/�j'��ii� . � � ' ��,�„'" �� I�,r o, � �_�, �,� ; f� �.:,, �� '� �. �� '�� '!�j��,,"��;;��// ', :�<�4.`.', � Existing Land Use ', � ��a� �� ` �} i� I� � %�1,.��//��Y �'`�'/ ii�i�� %r'� �;, = ��'� S i�T ( � ' r'..!.�i� /::.`� �� q�'�. �t.Y`�. � � �//fj�/ .-�� ..�.- "�,..- I �N�II � <�- j�,'/Jj�' 1T — � .�i� • � � ' '�� ';__�,�.;�� :� �._ ,,, �,�r. ,..- �� Ci ofi Orono = �`' ��,, :'��, i:-� _ . ///�,( �`�� .,, , , �?M �\, . 1 " I I � � �'• � � � � ��, °� 1 �I i' _ , m ;6 � r �. �r ; �?��',} l-, j �``_ .'�� .% n-.�� ,�% Minnesota I .i,. �e�:.a. �� , � �' ' �{��,�, :a� , ,;� ♦� � �� ,� ':� �� i'f -��' �� R�d ��'�6Y' � ' i � � �.��+,� �� , _ • �t p� , � ,�p',� �� i n * �f CV� •� � . Existing Land Use �� i'7 ' `_ .l,. st, � w �'Ca� a �.� '{�►� r� �L� F� i�. ii 9 � ,� .:. � � 5'7! 1 1 .' •b'tn 7� .r � �, "�'��y � � '�,�j� „ „ A�• , � F ,. �i��/ , Rural Res 2 Acre Min � I'!� �"� �//i "",`, % r[y ,. . 1 �,.:.�� ' � ��+'' � ( �"� �� _,/J�� a ., , � r SF Rural Res 5 Acre Min ��_. x }�� (�, �,"�� '//�% �l�k�'�`''o �s� -�', �� :� _ . �� 14� � f�r� � ' i� �fi� � �- �y-t� 'V1 ' �,� �,� � .%� � Low Density Res 0.2-0.5 units per acre . � �! ,.Jy Q �4. � t% �i •.1'Cv��', m � -i� � �.L. �'r' . . ,'� � �r� 1,��.� �-y „� �r� � ��'. � (:`,, ;� SF Med Density Res 0.6-0.5 per acre I I v� � �� U + l�-R, �.��1�� /i �- � i � ri��/� � ( e' ° � �-�� / �� - High Density Res 3-15 units per acre i /�i/��I /,�/%///�/ �/ ,�f� i i/i/ ,'r 1 �,� V/. �/ r ��i/� �%'�i�j;i>> �;+'Srr«l� �//�:'�// ��%�; , �I /`, ; ��/cli��"�� Commercial ��i��r ��/��j � r ,� � � �"'n � ��,��j �✓� � %� � �r ��' _ ', Office ; ��', /'� , '� , ✓�,. , � � �� J � � � , '� ,l� �%'�r/�. f. l�/ � , - Industrial i I � � / r �, ✓/ // . .//� � / � �!� . �1% �`f � � ��i�� / �/� ,� �/� � �� Inshtuiional i ! �r / ( � / � / - j i / i µ��/,�i C��/ +� 1�i .,/j ;/� �, µ,i� �. � � �/% z;,//�� / � ��,,��r� ��— ��. � Park/Open Space � i t''��,.Q,l,// i � , �'�l�"// �%l�i� /.. I � �(///ly�+`+1��',/�� ,,,�,r��" � ��'L`� �./.7�1�!.�i�''` i% zooa nnusa I _�/ �1////�j�� I� !� ,�/;� 'lfrf �Proposed MUSA � , / r,. iii; . i ✓/j / : . , 'i� � � I !1 l�.�i/l'�i i / � �, r' 1,,, ,� ,�/� / / «� �r��/� L.� Open Water ✓ �i �; � ,'• ;; // �Z? Wetlands li � � , I � � �. • / ' ' � �' � ' � ,,✓'�� ..� .�.. � � �� Parcei � � ..�d�c O� r��i�s+.�s�* —{— Railroad II �� ,T �l �.�i City Limits �I .�..�n�..�..� :' �•�i . � /l.., I ./��f%�%i lY i�t/�l.�� .... , � ��'l/'`,�,%'� '• ,,�/ �.. +s,,_ 1 � // �ii� ;' .�" w e i �. . � . � J //,, , /� .�. .� I j�� I'�/�il�� ' ,• ,�*� S �i'/%%/� i� %�r'�,rJ'rA� � .t� ��'�l'�� "� .� 0 3,500 7,000 �' � .�� % � ��..�..�..�..�..�..� Feet . �/,� �,�•�'' � •�,, /l.� ....�...,,.,.o.�.. �.,.,,,,.�., ,.. �., I� ��, � ��rn�a��u� Source: Bonestroo,NorthwestAssociated Consultants. Date:February 24,2010. MAP 3B-5 .s,t+� ,. , - �'p�Y j'u'�'d'��,'-�,"°1-'L' ;y-• , ,. ` T�,._.��.a.._.. u ,� !_ � t�� ' ��s1 I 71__._ L ' r .. �i_ 1t�<��l �.)O��e� �rw��• �a '/ oe ,r �n � I ,�y i' j�� T � � / �,�li'� �'� � F C � �- I IIYf � 4 �- } �.-,-�, �� e��'�' 'y�"��`,' _� ��, � � L�t��°�°�e�q� ;�. �^�i�� °'� 2030 Land Use Plan ..�_� �� ,�_ �' �� r� �r ( � �_ � � �,� � '•r I � ",,'�I{zt�\� � �, f �� -' �\�I, jf.�'. i�(�r'" ' '�j Y rl� _� .- -'�b �� v 9 i , _ u ,_, � ..i � „' � , F � j �, �� , _ ,� 4 ;- �; � �,. � =o, � � _.� _�� City of Orono •--, ^ �;,_ � i� , e _"a., . �� v�- 4 -i 1 N- ,{ --i .� �lf�'�� _ �� •�' � � , , i �.�a� ' ._� .�� } '�_, � � • � �� - � ��"I �/� ' � � � � ' y i ~ L� 1 �?, � L , �, Minnesota 1 jrc� �(_ �1.-F`��1��t`-��,� �� t �i � � -� � � Y�;��-S i 1 � i�� ° `� y,`i �t�`� j � i_ ; ` _ '�� tl L� rf',(� `1� =� �__ ,''�-� F�� , v.�:l u , i;-- � � , � ! v� '� � ��,�� ' �` � Future Land Use Cate ories � � �'� �'� � � " � 9 7 1 ,�' , �� I' �� -j � I�.� \ , z1� � � �,. } � 7 I i � �r��j �� t � �. ;L o � � ��' E� � �( �`'e.��'��`" �i � � � .�F �r � � �;� ��.. ,�,, �� , '; ; t � �'_ ��-f� ,- ��a, �y � � `�a �=i. �� ,� Rural(1 unit/Sao) I � I '- �.t�i �� T ��17�'� i � �i �y�� rr�� Y� _. i _ n � _ � � �� , r a�,� G ��' � �Rural Residential(1 unit/2 ac) 1 � y, 1 '-s ` �� y� .�: � �� ' � � � � t . � �. .- � ' � '�, � i 1', �� "� �[h � ✓F� r d� �.i�� ti - � � � �� Low Density Residential(0.5-2 units/ac) : l'� ��l� -'�i: �i ,� ��+P��"t �,��- �� , ( , � �, � Low-Medwm Density Residential(2-3 units/ac) �Y -. �z"'!4E_�' � � � �� f��.I'4�'�h �1-_-- � < - � �.��,i``& �� {E�� _ �— a �L�C,,,�- ' I � ��' �S� t ! . "-� ��=' F y � �-- j: � �i-� I�MediumDensityResidentfal(3-7units/ac) � � �� 4i �l_ � I �, �� 1.�1',�1� ' � �:�j �� w , '��-i �� ,�/ �o� �,ir3 � �Medium-High Density Residential(7-10 units/ac) �� f ��t V �- 1 ��i _ ,L_.. n � --9 e� Q \b � � r}��_L.f El r � �Y` J� 1- ►�w � o �, � �'7�x�� - ' �;�� ` ��"�i��, �High Density Residential(10-15 units/ac) :� �fi .� �. {� � ` �� _ � �j �`��' � � �}1� ' � � °��"-E� � Mixed Use Residential(6-15 unitslac) ,;. � � .. . � }� �d;' �V3`�i ,.� �Ij'� 1: - � `� 4 -�, �, �� i'�-�� y',:� � ° � .� y �� . � � �Commercial �� ` \ 'L � Office - j j t' "1` �' ( � �� .�� _ - � '' � � �� 11' � �1� �, � ��-� .-v. � I�a� � �' ;�,'� � C' •.�� -�. ) ; � Industrial � � �, L �- �i� d o � �,� ��'«� �°� ��—�<�� 5 � Park,Recreational,and Open Space .j I av�v, ,} � I'`l " ( `, ' � } /�`�' �t _'� 1 : ,u ;� �� P ,M ��'� - Institutional ,�� ,�.�. -��,� 1� ,. � � �� , .�r' s,. Z� i 1 i � i- � °p i � �'� � �PfopOsed MUSA I � �� :� � , � �'. t r � � � ?� Open Water �= � i �� 1 �� i �� ''��0� �F! �� 2_5 Wetlands r �,, , ,� .. , �� '+ � ��I �� J � Parcel ;�%�� `' + ♦ � . � � r �++� , t- Railroad � rl � ~� rC � , ', � � �+ City Limits 2�.>> �s + r r`�.,' ,� i i 1��u�Naa�� • �'. \ /.. . � r'_ 4-\\;r ; � � - . .. . . _. .i �r ° .� �,�.�li�.--'i..�..�..� � ,� w G � �, ��a � y, �� . � �Y �y�� 'A u � S � t � � � F�`'` �` ��N��' r�i�� + 0 3,500 7,000 � � �S;xt. ��_� �' ' � � 0�. � �.� Feet � <4,.,� �a �'''' �► �'` , '�'`�� '''�. *� • ..�...� . .�..��.�.�..� .o....„,.,,o�,.,..�o,.�,..... ,.. . �,,, , :;±�,5,, � _.__....----- ------------_ . ��_..� , •� ., �� Source: Bonestroo,NorthwestAssociated � �'�..�.+��. Consultants. Date:March 18,2010. i MAP 36-6 � {n�a�� I r �} _.�._— ��=��•f-.. / Yl�. `�a.��u�� i�l _.._—_.. ._ _—.___.—.__—..__ a n��uu� ��n�n � u�u�u u �I�u u�r� � f��■e��uu u f it � �i 1 u�u�� /J �� r �I i � r� ..� —` � � � _ ��r ��/� '�r � J ��" �✓,�/ � �\l��i�a� i I -_ --': � 1 ' Planned Develo ment =1� � ' '�;�� ,/i� �/� '/�/�,��1'�'� � J r-,� ��'`1 � �� p �_-- 4 � ��r� �✓ !r �,� i�� '� ��;V r �',° ��,�� % /%,;r�/��,�� _� s �.,� SIteS r% ,. , � �� '�: � � � _ , % � � ��, � � ''�` ,i j_�-- - '� � ��'/J'',,��, �. � , _, .�l _ _�r= - ;— � .��il.rrr��'��'�h , f �� , _ _ - ' j � + ��.,.. •"''� � I__ __ . J �-�Ir ;-- - ��! J � ,��r-��-_ _ _ .� B ''t�.�e � � � �J ;�� City of Orono , i.�l` _ � ri r I�_ ; ,, - ' ;; ' �,.�, f�.�, � ,'; �� ' _ f/� Minnesota r j t- �' ,,� � ,,� I �' \� I \ .il� i i'i � � �i i�7 Y/ �T ;�� '!� �� Y } ...�� , / � �L-1 �. F� T ��'i i 7� � �. � ll � '1r��I � �� P • �� 11\\��I � �_�� j�� I'.�j�� rP ��: i��T�� . .,�.'7�'r��,. . ��.� ` ��fr�.lvs��ra��fi t` � ��i ff l i j �� L,�'� 7 i � �•" � / lf/� �t�� i. -� � �� ,�__ ,� ,'1 ��,r ��y_�� _ � ��■� Planned Develo ment Areas �'I J_�� ' � j�'��r -'- �i��'/ ��` ..�, � _;��5.� ✓.��'/- ' /�� ` � i � � P /,.. I • j � -_ ,� r'�� ` � �7 ' ,� � / a � Parcel � � �\ �'(�r'�'i'��J�, ! % lrl�r �� :1( }" � I _' _C., 1 �`,r/�. � •i /!s.�•.+ � i i �� '��;/,/� - � �; � , � i�,if.�� 1 ��/ 2008 MUSA � ��-� 3,.�l G�1✓/ l�, - �. /�/ � ' '"' ;'. I V,�i�l;��/��'�/� � � � �� I �jo��. �j% �� " � �'� �.,%�-" Proposed MUSA2010-2030 s f � %'� � l��u f ////�/ � r � ,�' � ..�.. � %� t�� .•�, .� ��a � �/ ., . � City Limits ...•, ',�� 7 %�� %'�' �'�� /y� � �,�I� /��%'//,J/i� �,' � ..�..� , l �� .. ��r 1�/ $�/�, , �✓,��/ �/ l,t. - �,��, .. �� f�: ✓/��l% �/�/�✓✓'� --- :.� � A- Orchard Area �'�'�'��, i. /�,�.�'� ��' II/i��r ��%%'%��'� � ! B - Fire Station Area � t�,,�',,��'?�!1i:�/l�/i,� �!� /'�. i!� �� ; ''" ! C - High Density Site r�rr�i �' r l ' �' ,� �.�� /�- / ///// � �, 'I �'''•� ��,��,�,;y,;�,� � '�✓/ � D - New MUSA Sites •.� ,r � � ��.,� j I i _ � „ � . .. �, E 2 Acre Sewered Lots � 1 '� i �. � �� i ! �;�� .�° '�..�,��- F - Navarre Mixed Use Area , � ;� �� '� �.��. � �� ` •••�, j Map associated with Net Density of � � � �'� �� '� y ��i, ti � Residential Development Table. :...�..�.��.�..•• � j . /�i�!�� j I :��f�;;1 j N � �� - . . .._.. ; ; � ,1 � f>�/lfr,/ �Jjff��',-, i/��J f,•�,r ,''�dr�,' f �I 4I � ''��`, W E � ' �� / /�j� •• �o r �, �I � �I �/'I�/!��%i � �� I �� t; �� S / ,�r� ��j�4� j � 4_.1_ � . ,p � ��y'l��j/ �.. � 'r�. �� .�� •' 0 3,600 7,200 j �� ✓ I'� � � � 1, �f� I�. � � Feet � �� ',�. : �` . ♦n�n�u�n�n�n�` �� ♦ �� l✓.+t�� ?� o.�w..,�., �4� 1 --,--_--- �� ---r�_ �o�..�..�� I Source: Bonestroo,Northwest Associated Consultants. Date:February 24,2010. iL MAP 3B-6a Navarre Area - � Proposed Residential Mixed Use Sites Existing Zoning Map City of Orono ; Minnesota � � ,;'i i j � i ��, ,,�., � I �`, i - ��. . � � , •• v ��•�� ,SY:,. �� '��'. .�. I ...�.. �. , ..,... � �II� _ ��:A:�.._ ' kp � . . . � ��4��1 'e� A'a.Ot:..s� —r— I F' � . � � �.'_ � � '9 �.. .� ',... G�: � .. A ��" � ; .a�. � '"�� Lyric Ave o ,1 � ,.� ' ., . -, , I� , ^. , o +" '- s , ' .�____r--.�_; _ ...., 1 � , � .= . . i . , .� , o. - �.�� .Shoreline Qr . .. __._ �.�..�..�.. ,� � �{ � O '-"`� >. �' � �� ' , � ;C_ _ ,. ______�_ 'o k St —� , G ... � � � ��,� �� ;� —�� -----J —�� ___� �L . � QO� .�/ GO ,� y __--...._ G � �� 9 \ ��o ___._ � ��.� /. f ; %�� , ----r-- / �' T � %', j � _ % ' � i J� i, � --.�� . _-��t'�� I ZONING DISTRICTS Q Proposed Mixed Use Designations I __. _ _ B-1 -Retail Sales � Open Water � B-3-Shopping Center �� City Limits I - B-4-Office/Professional Parcel i —� Railroad i - B-5-Limited Neighborhood � %_; LR-1 B-One Family Lakeshore Residential-1 Acre � W �j C I - LR-1 C-One Family Lakeshore Residential-1/2 Acre c� � --"- S I I LR-1C-1 -One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict- 1/2 Acre - PRD-Planned Residential Development 0 820 1,6a0 Feet i � ! wo��nr�� •�wci.no co�suiuwi�. iHt. Source: City of Orono, Bonestroo, Northwest " � Associated Consultants. Date: March 18, 20�0. MAP 3B-6b , � � �l � , I � \ ��I -� � �� 0~ -- �— =- _ . \ , � _ ,.. � m '� �`'` ' � - _ i >� � � i �;� s � � _�,.,o' - � / F {� ',� �� _ �- � � _ " 5�� `T ',�`��' I — � � � �� , Z � � '_ � � �i �� -- - � �� ,� � � � � -- � � _ � ,� � __ _ � 1 �_ — ;a � .` ' � ��.—��0 � ., � I � �- � � �. -� , , i �:�> . i , _ — � } - I _ � � � � f ., , - _ — _ --- , .a, f�-r � � � ,.;� `�a 1F!' � - ri ( _ _��C1- � -= '�� '� =--- ' � ,-._ -`� � rcelaC"qr.ou p � ��T�-�� -' T� � , %� � � " ��-^, ��.� �ti -�" }� a� i � ii �. ��/ � � � .�� s, ' _,s� t � . � .__ - „ ,�7 � �. '. � _,� , �� . � � � � ��1" � ' , ,� y"% � i � �� ..�u�..�u�u ' / ,;` }�'y""' �� _ �� ' L,, � ,, i � PaCC@I GCOUp 2, n � ��,..� ��+ i O i c � �`r+� _ �� H� \ a � 1 f�� %! , '1" �_ ��' �"� �%� � I �' -- -' , � / �_ �,� j i —_ ..�..��.� �_ . i ; -,�. � � 1 - �� %� � � � . � �. . �.. �� ! ��. �� t � '>�' �{� � J ��_ I�arr ;G',,up 3 _ y `�.'%'�-. �� f� � � - �-��—��''" 'f__- . �-�� •"�.. �� (� �� F— __ � �� _ .. � _, �► ♦ �� —�- ,� - ,.- - - - �E_� '�. � / -�- ._ i a ,�!�� '��j' � � .r � —,-�` ;;�, �� i � :—� -, � �i � ��]��'�: ,,,.!�� ` •. _„_.._..3_�. _ � , � , �, _� _ �---� �� 1 -,� �J , � E , "'� ' �,t�",*�. �,\� � �< , %, � �.. , � . ;t �\� ' � - � p�—�L � -��'-1°7 __ �J� " �*Z�' j 1 \ ` ` �\�� - ^ � . � � . � .� • % ' i�:;. •� ` r ■ Y� � �� / � �II �� O \ � ' _ �—. _ �S�/'_�- �_ ,i�� . � �a��C � � \ /,,i � , �/ �-.'� ��,.;�S: i I r1 n� . � - -• • _ �� — ��-- �-�.— °° �t ,�-� ', � 1=x� ��— '' `• ' ___ , : _; \ `� f� r Oi_` \ .—:- I ,- b�� _: �8 � L!� , �� , :` 4!j �i/ , � " ,�i � . _ _� , � , r . . � � _ � o � r � Q �il � �' h_ � � T` �I� � a Il �� a, � m ! � - - � ..�..�..�.. � r � � '� �`�;�,� ;' I-'I ,I�c��'�(�� ' � � ��" , , r�,� - _ , =''�;`�-- - ._ , �-. `� . I �, � _ _ } ;� _ � � i= �'� , � ��v r� ! �( r�f � i ;� _r��,.�,T�,,�� 1 , .�'�� `�. - Parcel Group 1 Future Land Use Categories Highway 12 Areas Existing Zoning: RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development �'�'�'l Med��moe�S��vRes�de��a� Guided or Proposed II' �Medium-High Density Residential fo r M u Iti-Fa m i I Parcel Group 2 �High Density Residential y � Existing Zoning: RR-1 B Rural Residential -Commercial * � Residential Uses i OHice � Parcel Group 3 -Industrial City of Orono I Existing Zoning: RPUD Residential Planned Development and RR-1 B SFR Rural Residential -Inshtutional � OpenWater Minnesota Parcel Group 4 z� Wetlands i Existing Zoning: RPUD Residential PLanned Unit Development Parce1 'This map corresponds with Table 38-5. -�—Railroad Parcel Group 5 N yf'. City Limlts «o.,�.�., .,,o��...o �o..�,,..,,. ,�<. _ _. _ __.___._�.________ _. Existing Zoning: RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development W � ; Source: Bonestroo,NorthwestAssociated 0 1,700 3,400 Consultants. Date:February 24,2010. jS Feet �__ MAP 3B-7 --- -- — _� • CMP Part 3B. Land L"se Plan ,(/t.� lirban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require, and to financially support, municipal sewer and water services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreational facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas, on the other hand, have limited density and have environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. The existing rural densities do not require extensive public services and, in fact, could not economically support an urban service level. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have new residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the surroundinQ neighborhoods. Economic development will likely be limited to neighbarhood services in the existing Na��arre Area, and greater utilization of the industrial and commercial potential near Long Lake. While a significant amount of higher density housing will be developed to accommodate a wider ranae of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively low (development in this planning period will ran�e from 0.5 to 1� units per acre) because of the ecoloQical considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. y The rural area is expected to have continued residential development at a slo��, steady pace. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. With the lar�e percentaae of wetlands, steep slopes and public open space, the majority of the rural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least � dry buildable acres. When wetlands, roads, steep slopes and public open space are factored in, nearly 80% of the City's land will be developed at densities averaaing from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. The net developed density will be not more than 1 unit per 2 acres of dry-buildable land (0.� units per acre), this being determined on a detailed review of individual site conditions. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and de��elopment objectives of Orono. The 19�0's and 1960's were years of great expansion and reliance upon the powers of science and industry to solve all problems. Population b aphs showed gro��th projections running off the paper. Suburbs boomed while core cities were fightin� for their very survival. The 1970's brouQht a ne�v environmental a��areness and an understandinQ that nature, not science was the key to our planet's survival. This simply cauQht up to Orono's environmental protection philosophy that has driven development of the City since the 19�0's. Cit�- of Orono Communih-Management Plan 2008-2030 Paae 3B-10 C:��TP Part 3B. Land lise Plan • The Twin Cities metro area continues to e�pand both in population and in territory covered. Suburban developments continue to appear at the urban-rural frin�es and have expanded past the Metropolitan Council's jurisdictional limits intoysunoundina counties and even into Wisconsin. Pressures have mounted to control this "urban sprawl", focused at redevelopment of the core cities, greater use of hi�her density infill development in the inner ring suburbs, and b eater density of new development at the developing fringe. Hand-in-hand with the attempts to curb urban sprawl have been pressures (and a real need) to provide new housing to meet the needs of a population that is widely di��erse in aae ranges, lifestyles, and income levels. � Orono's ultimate population projections have been droppin� from estimates of 37,000 made in 1970, to 23,000 in 1972, to 14,000 in 1974, to 11,000 in 1979. Population trends durinQ the last 30 years and a careful analysis of development capabilities of remaining land as compared t rono's urrent zoning and land use plan, suggest an ultimate population of aro nd 9,800. his fiQure is very close to Orono's current (2008) estimated populatio , 0. This downward trend over the last 3 decades is clearly a result of Orono's 197� city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reactinb to environmental concerns regardin� protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. The projected population is in line �vith and a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Table 3B-l: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2030 � (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) � Population I"ear � 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 � 2030 Se«�ered -- -- -- -- �,800 7,000 i,300 Unsewered -- � -- -- � -- �.500 � ?.�00 �.�00 � Total Cit�� 6,787 6,84� � 7,28� i 7,�38 8,300 � 9,�00 9,800 � � Households i i I 1'ear 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 I Se��ered — -- -- ?,�56 �,950 3.020 Unsewered — — i -- i -- 944 1.000 1,080 Total Cit�• 2,146 2,291 2,613 ; 2,766 3,200 3,9�0 4,100 Persons/HH � 3.16 ?.99 ?.79 �.73 � ?.59 ?.41 2.39 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Cit`• of Orono Communih'nlanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-11 CMP Part 3B. Land tise Plan ReQional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on HiQhway 12 throu�h Orono and LonQ Lake. A new 2-lane limited access `through' route paralleling Hiahway 12 from Orono's eastern border to the Co. Rd. 6 intersection was completed and opened to traffic in December 2008, dramatically decreasin�the traffic levels on Old Highwav 12 and providina a more attractive alternative to County Road 1� for commuters from Mound, Minnetrista and points west. Environmental and social pressures have permanently eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 1� along the lakeshore. Orono wi11 continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. ReQional sewer sezvice facilities plans were revised three decades a�o in response to Orono's plans for low-density development. Oi-iginal plans called for sewering all of Orono with capacity for 37,000 people. But the final Orono-Long Lake Interceptor was relocated and is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly desicned to pro��ide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent �vith Orono's environmental concerns for the rural area and with MCES regional concerns includina the limited design capacity and massive environmental discharge problems associated with the central sewage collection and treatment systems. Orono's commercial and economic development has al��ay�s been centered in the historic to�i�n centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been more than amply met by commercial facilities and shoppinQ centers located in Na��an-e and in sun-oundina communities. Rural and urban residents alike utilize these facilities and in fact, the commercial ��itality of the neiQhboring cities relies in pai-t upon the reQional seivice area that includes all of Orono. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accoinmodate all planned population gro«�th in a wide variety of h ' g opportunities. The forecast population � increase of ?.000 person in the n t twenty ye�r anslates into a housing "demand" of approxima ely 800 n dwellin` nits ��he decreasinb household sizes are taken into ac unt. is averaae of 40 ne � dwellin�s per year is consistent with or sliahtly below Orono's ra of a al new residence building peimit issuance durina the past two decades. ased on the Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. New urban housing will be in a �•ariety of forn�s including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family and attached townhome dwelling units on �acant sewered parcels in the Navarre area and on larger parcels Cit�� of Orono Communit�� Ianagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-12 CNTP Part 3B. Land L"�se Plan ` desi�nated for urban development in the Hiahway 12/Lon� Lake area; hiaher ' density residential alon� the Hiahway 12 corridor; and hiaher density residential in the form of Mixed Use Development in the 1�Tavarre Commercial District. Other new units will be in the form of replacement or conversion of existin� seasonal or substandard dwellinQs especially alon� the lakeshore. Most new rural housin� will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry-buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brouQht into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required respectively by urban and rural neiahborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area, but there is insufficient capacity for any inajor expansion of the existing urban area to densities commensurate with Metropolitan Council goals of 3.0 units per acre for all new sewered development. All new rural non-Shoreland development is intended to be permanently self-sufficient in terms of on-site sewage treatment. In the event that existing rural neighborhoods outside the 2008-2030 MUSA are identified as havin� significant on-site system failures with no on-site alternatives for sewaQe treatment, requests for extension of municipal sewer will be considered only if the affected residents are willin� to pay all costs associated with such service, under the condition that rural densities ��ill not be compromised and rezonina to urban densities will not occur, and subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council when required. Orono's transportation plan is tailored to the different needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. Most roads within Orono directly service the abutting properties. The intended exceptions are the Old Hi�hway 12 con-idor fiom Brown Road to Old Crystal Bay Road, and the ne�� Hiahway 12 Bypass �rhich is a limited-access arterial be�innina east of the City and extending west to County Road 6 with no interchan�es or local access. Near the lakeshore and in some rural areas, the collector roads are relatively slow speed with circuitous alignment dictated by the hills and bays rather than by commuter preference. These roads have been desi�nated "scenic park�vays" to connote their aesthetic qualities and lack of hiQh speed, through traffic potential. The urban areas are pro��ided with a typical network of city streets connecting residential and shopping areas with each other. The rural area is �-idded-off with a core system of publicly maintained collector and minor arterial streets running at regular intervals. Within this orid, most rural homes are located on neighborhood owned and maintained private roads servinQ fi•om three to ten Cit�- of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-13 • CMP Part 3B. Land lise Plan 18. No land will be developed unless its location and characteristics are suitable for the proposed use in accordance with this plan. Land to be developed must be of such size, character and location that it can be safely used for the intended purpose without danger to health, without peril from fire, flood or other occurrence and without undue impact upon neighboring properties. No land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewa�e disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. tiRBAI�' LAND USE POLICIES 1. The majorit� of Orono's urban area w�ill be reserved for residential land use. Orono's urban residential neighborhoods will provide the opportunity for a variety of housina types and price ran�es. Many urban residences will be � �mately associate e shoreline and will be subject ensity restrictions because of sensiti environmental con tions. Medium and Hi�h Density multi-family resid tial uses will be limite � � ansportation services, but will not be appropriate ��ithin 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka except when in close proximity fo the Navarre commercial area abuttin� CR 1� or CR 19. 2. Limited commercial areas ��ill be pro��ided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercial areas ��ill be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to seive Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban seivices, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature (i.e. "big box" retail) which would increase traffic, particularly on collector streets ser��ing low density , residential development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial Development is targeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas w�ill be provided for public access and limited lake-user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishin� supplies, boat sernice and boat repair facilities which Cit�� of Orono Communit�•1�lanaaement Plan 2008-2030 Paae 3B-19 CVIP Part 3B. Land Use Plan • are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limited to areas where full urban services, includin� municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. y 4. The City will encourage private unification and coordination of the existing commercial areas. Unplanned strip commercial developments w�ill be discouraged. Coordinated projects desi{Jned to aesthetically enhance; unify and identify the business areas will be encouraQed. 5. Future industrial development will be limited to the area of the existing Orono industrial park. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is entirely consistent with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. 6. Commercial and industrial development will not be permitted to adversely affect neighboring residential propert�. The location, scale and types of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach upon or adversely impact the primary residential land uses in Orono. V�'herever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. Public urban services must be a��ailable for all future commercial, industrial and urban-i-esidential development. Commercial, industrial and urban-density residential uses ��ill be pennitted only where rnunicipal sanitary sewer, adequate transportation, police and fire protection sen�ices are available. In addition, commercial, indush-ial and multi-farnily residential development wi11 be permitted only where a municipal water system is available for adequate water supply and fire protection. 8. lirban development will utiliae the capacit�� of eaisting public facili�ies. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and ��ith the e�isting or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. Ne�� development �vill not be permitted to overburden these services af the expense of the e�isting users. New urban development will not be permitted if it requires additional unplanned local or re�ional facilities capacity. � 9. The existing ui•ban area will not be expa . Orono's Community ManaQement Plan is not a staged aro��th p n. Except in limited cases, as Cit�� of Orono Couimunity Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-20 � CMP Part 3B. Land lise Plan defined by this plan, the ban service area will not be expanded into the defined rural area and, rban services and facilities will not be extended � o the rural a for purposes of fostering or allowing increased development density in those areas. 10. The design and densitv of urban development will be controlled to assure protection of light, air and solar access for neighboring properties. Requirements for minimum lot size, amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum buildin� heights will be desi�ned to assure protection of these �•alues for all urban residents. ll. A significant amount of natural woodlands and open space will be retained on each property. Retention of the natural environment requires careful sitina and preservation of trees and open space on each urban property. 12. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks ancl structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural veQetation. Lake use regulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City rebulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters a�-ailable for pri��ate docking and boat storage. 13. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree heiQht. Minimum areen belts will be provided ��ith prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural veRetation will be preserved on slopes and retainina wa11s will be discoura�ed except �hen absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural ��egetation. RliRAL LAND tiSE POLICI ES 1. Orono's rural area will be resei-ved for permanent low-density i-esidential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of stornl water nutrient loadiny vs. marshland assimilative capacity precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low-density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be peinZitted in the rural area. City of Orono Communit��Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-21 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan - 2. Orono's rural area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses, orchards, truck farms, riding stables and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. 3. Rural densit,y is limited b�- natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including extensive wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, which factors influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. 4. The existing t-ural area «�ill not be urban' . r��ornmun'r Mana�eir�rif-P"an is no staged growth an. Except in limited cases as � identified in this plan, the rban area will ded into the area. n services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and rural land use density will be maintained at a level to ensure that private on-site sewer systems will operate satisfactorily and that rural wetlands and draina�eways will not be overloaded with storm water nutrient pollution. �. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban sei�ices are not compatible with i-ural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. 6. Ruc•al Iand uses do not i-equire municipal sewer service. Orono's soil, topo�-aphy and low-density rural land use pro��ide the ingredients necessary to assure safe, adequate, pet7nanent on-site sewage treatment and waste water disposal without hazard to ground water, surface water or the public health. Extension of sewer seivice to properties in the rural area will be avoided, except when necessary to protect the public health, or to avoid or eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. Future expansions of the sewer system into the Rural Area to solve existing neighborhood sewage treatment problems or along the lakeshore to avoid or eliminate potential ne�ative impacts on lake ��ater quality, will not result in a reclassification of those neighborhoods fiom Rural to Urban. Expansion of the sewer system into the Rural Area will not result in the provision of additional urban sen�ices, nor will it result in changes to allowed developinent densities. Cit�� of Orono Communit��Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-22 ' CMP Part 3B. Land lise Plan the 7-county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation pro�-am that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element of the implementation pro�ram is a housing implementation program, "...including official controls to implement the housin� element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing." Orono's share is forecasted at 311 new affordable housinQ units for the decade 2011-2020. � EXISTING AND FUTURE LA�D L'SE SUMMARY Map 3B-� depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2008. As shown in Table 3B-2: Orono E�isting Land Use Summary�,just over 1i3 of Orono's total area is in open water; of the 2�3 that is land area, 89% is devoted to residential or parks & open space uses. Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land LTse Summary (2008) Land Gse Cate°or�• Acreage I % of Cit�� Rura( Residential ?,709 � 17.6% Sinole Family Rural Residential 1,?14 7.9°ro i � Lo� Densiry Residential 1,96� 1?.9% � Sinale Family Medium Density Residential 1,?14 7.990 High Densit}�Residential 67 0.4°�0 Commercial 44 0.3°io j Office 31 0.?% � Industrial 42 0.3°�o I � Institutional �34 � 1.5°io i Park/Open Space 1,796 � 11.7°o p I I Open Water �,244 34.1°o i j Railroad 114 0.7°i6 �� Right-of-a'a�� 68? f 4.�% , � TOTAL 1�,356 100% J; Source: Existine Land Use Map Cit�� of Orono Communit�� 'Ianagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-28 CNIP Part 3B. Land [Jse Plan ' Map 3B-6 indicates the detailed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use map will form the basis for land use zoning decisions. Table 3B-3 is a summary of Orono's Planned Land Use in �-year increments through 2030. Note that the Summary reflects that the planned uses are to be allowed to take effect immediately rather than being staged over a period of years. Table 3B-3: Orono 2030 Planned Land Use'Summar I 2030 Land Use Cateaories I 2010 201� 2020 2025 2030 , � Acreaae Rurai 1,214 1,214 1.?14 1,214 1.?14 Rural Residential � ?.677 ?.677 ?.677 2.677 ?.677 Low Density Residential 1,921 1,9�1 1,921 1,9�1 1,921 � � i Low-Medium Density Residential � l,?09 � 1,?09 1.209 1,?09 1.?09 � Medium Density Residentia( �� 52 5? Medium-Hi�h Densiry Residential 102 10? 10� 10? 102 Hi�h Density Residential �3 �3 ?3 23 23 � Mixed Use 3� 3� 3� 3� i 35 Commercial 3? 3? ;� �� , Office '0 � 20 ?0 ?0 20 Industrial 4? 4? 4? � 42 4� , Park.Recreational. and Open Space 1,78� 1.78� 1.78� 1.785 1.78� � Institutional �?7 ��7 � �� Open Water � 5,?44 5,?44 �.?44 �,?44 �,244 � Raili-oad 114 114 114 114 I 114 Rieht-of-�%a�� 6�9 659 6�9 6�9 I 6�9 TOTAL 15,356 15,3�6 1�,3�6 15,3�6 15,3�6 Future Land Use Projections Table 3B-4a is a projection of the numbers of sewered and unsewered households by �-year increments from ?O10 throuah 2030. Cit�� of Orono Communin�Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-29 . � CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan a �� ii � ;,� -'� F � i' ` Table 3B-4a: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 Summar-�- of Projected Total Households 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Sewered 2256 2603 2950 2985 3020 Unsewered 944 972 l 000 ]040 1080 Total Households 3200 3575 3950 4025 4100 Persons per Housel�old 2.59 2.45 2.41 2.40 2.39 Total Population 8,300 8,750 9,500 9,650 9,800 Table 3B-4b is a projection of employment by �-year increments for the period of 2010 throu�h 2030. � Table 3B-4b: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 Forecasted Employment 2010-2030 Within Outside Total MUSA MUSA Em lo ment ZOlO 1�35 35 1370 2015 1425 40 146� 2020 I515 40 I555 2025 1�55 40 1595 2030 1595 40 1635 Table 3B-4c depicts Orono's net density of residential development by residential use categories based on the 2030 Planned Land Use Summary. The Planned Development Areas are depicted on Map 3B-6A. �Table 3B- 4c Orono Net Densi of Residential Develo ment* � � � '�� Sin�lc ' � '� Acres �� I � i � Family Acres Public Acres Acres Net Land Use #of Multi Acres Wetland& Parks/ Arterial Other Net Density (Planned Units Family# Gross water- Open Roads Un-developed Res Units/ Dev.Areas Tar et of Units Resid. bodies S ace ROW Land Acres Acre H=GD- A Q C D E F G E-F-G (A+B)/H Med-High(A) - 441 101.91 44.06 - - 0 57.85 7.62 High(B) - 90 8.94 0 - - 0 8.94 10.07 High(C) - 59 ]0.43 4.58 - - 0 5.85 10.09 Low(D) 4 - 7.32 0 - - 0 7.32 0.55 Low(E) 58 - ]30.96 15.12 - - 0 1 15.84 0.5 �� Mixed Use (F) - �� 176 � ��.>6 �� ?6 - - 0 � �9.30 � 6.01 '� TOTAL 62 766 294.12 69A2 - - 0 225.10 3.68 �� *This table corresponds��ith Map 3B-ba. � City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-30 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan + URBAN LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE Urban residential development will retain the basic single family character of the community but will also provide for a wider range of housing types at generally low densities consistent with available services, the natural amenities of the land, and environmental protection. Planning devices such as clustering will permit a limited amount of multiple dwellings such as patio homes, townhouses and garden apartments to be located near commercial areas within the overall planned density of the neighborhood. Urban residential development requires municipal sanitary sewer, an adequate transportation system, neighborhood recreational facilities and other typical urban services. The location of urban residential uses depends to a substantial degree on the environmental impact on Lake Minnetonka and the protection of the natural wetlands system for storm water filtration and purification. All urban residential land within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka will require special environmental restrictions and lower land use densities in order to assure shoreline protection and minimal direct storm water runoff pollution. �� LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 0.5 to 2 LTNITS PER ACRE � This is the typical urban residential density developed and planried for areas which are within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka and which have particular environmental impact on the lake. LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 2 to 3 LTNITS -PER ACRE � This is the typical land use density of the historic development in Navarre and the older residential neighborhoods. Certain other residential areas are planned for this density where services are available beyond 1,000 feet from the lakeshore. Municipal water is generally provided to these districts for supply � ( and fire protection, in addition to the necessary sewer service. � f s MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 3 to 7 UNITS PER ACRE � These densities are provided for along Highway 12 as shown on the Land Use ; Plan. Development at these densities will be limited to properties where ` special conditions such as abutting land use, as well as proximity to urban � utilities and services, would make the parcel appropriate for housing clusters : or multi-family development. Since the areas identified for this higher density E development are to some extent limited by environmental constraints, each ( such development must be analyzed and reviewed on an individual basis. The R properties identified for residential development at densities of 3-7 units per acre include properties guide-planned for such use as a result of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1988, as well as properties � City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-31 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan �0, heretofore planned for single family development at rural densities. All identified properties are located relatively high in the Lake Minnetonka � watershed, allowing ample opportunity for effective stormwater rnanagement. : MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 7 to 10 LTNITS PER ACRE This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely si�uated that residential development at a density exceeding 7 units per acre will have no negative impacts on the surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Sites proposed for this density will be analyzed and reviewed on an individual basis. Properties proposed for this density shall be outside the Shoreland � Overlay District. The initial areas targeted for inclusion into this land use � designation are along Highway 12, near the more intense commercial and industrial land uses west of Long Lake. HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL— 10 to 15 UNITS PER ACRE This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for � higher density projects. MIXED USE—6 to 15 UNITS PER ACRE The Mixed Use Residential and Commercial designation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residentiaL This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near-by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive, as shown on Map 3B-6b. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi-family residential development such as senior assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher-density residential use or mixed residential-commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects. Properties identified for urban densities of 3-7 units per acre or 7-15 units per � acre, along Highway 12, are detailed in the following tables and maps� which identify required development parameters. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-32 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan �f�� l l Table 3B-5: Highway 12 Areas Guided or Proposed for Multi-Family Residential Uses* pal'Ce� GPOUp 1 50-acre site located north of Old Highway 12 (Wa,yzata Blvd) between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bav Road Background, Site Characteristics Planned Development Parameters Current Development Status 1988 CMP Amendment#2 guided 1. An east-west service road(Kelley As of January 2009 Kelley this area for a combined Parkway)has been developed to connect Parkway has been completed and commercial and townhome Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow opened. development. Drive. This will allow for one tier of North of Kelley,development of developable lots between Kelley Municipal facilities were Parkway and HiQhway 12, such lots to 157 units of MFR is underway, developed at the west end of the have access to Kellev but not to including a 57 unit condomimum parcel in 1991,at which time the Highway 12. � buildin�and l00 rambler and initial segment of Kelley Parkway two-story townhome units in was developed. 2. The portion of the property between �roups of 2 and 3 units. Potential development options for Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway may be South of Kelley, 5 commercial the remainder of the site were developed with one tier of commercial parcels of 2-5 acres each have generated by the City in l 998, uses,to include professional office as been latted.A medical-dental well as limited service uses, and retail p accounting for extensive wetlands uses accessory to the office use. office has been completed, a and an existing Highway 12 second medical office and a stormwater pond. The site is very 3. The property north of the service road bank/office combination have flat, with high water table soils, may be developed for a mix of single been approved but construction partially wooded. family and multi-family uses at a density not yet commenced, and a third of 3-6 units per dry buildable acre. office site remains vacant. Additional Development Factors,Parcel Grou� 1 A stormwater pond serving the entire 50-acre development site has been developed along Highway ]2. Parcel Group 2 102 acres located between Wayzata Boulevard and the new Highway 12 / BN Railwa corridor,abuttina and west of Old C stal Ba Road. Current Development Status: East 18 acres is vacant. West 84 acres contains working apple orchard; a former sanitary landfill site; and 2 single family homes. Parcel Group 2 has been eapanded to include the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard. Background,Site Characteristics The westerly 29-acre property at 3245 Wayzata Property includes 6 separate tax parcels currently zoned Boulevard is co�nprised of two tax parcels containing for single family rural development at a density of l unit a single-family residence and a closed sanitary per 2 acres. New Highway 12 corridor abuts the south side �andfilL The property contains approaimately 5 of this property group. developable acres, with an additional 10 acres Gross area: 102 ac+ encumbered with the former landfill, plus 14 acres of Wetlands on site: 34 ac+ wetland. The property is being re-guided in this CMP Unusable landfill area: 10 ac+ to allow for medium-high density multi-family Net available for development: 58 ac+ residential development. Easterly portion is relatively flat with high-watertable soils and interspersed wetland pockets. Central portion has 5%- 15%slopes,dropping a total of 50'down to major wetland basin. Soils are better suited for use of septic systems, but p�anned Development Parameters: slopes may be a factor for individual sites. This area is more wooded and contains apple orchard. Medium—High Density Residential The easterly acreage of this property group was 441 Units 7.6 units/ac. incorporated into the MUSA with the 2000 Comp Plan update. City of Orono Communitv Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-33 CMP Part 3B. Land LJse Plan Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 2 This parcel group has a number of factors which make it unattractive for 2-acre rural residential development as currently zoned, including: - Location between two hi�hway corridors is not conducive to rural development. - Location across from Industrial Park is not conducive to rural development. - East portion abuts one of the busiest intersections in Orono. - Much of site is poorly suited for development with septic systems due to soils and topography. Municipal sewer and water are relatively available as compared to most other areas of the City. Group 2 has direct access to arterial and collector road system, and is relatively near urban services as compared to most other areas of the City. Furthermore,the Group is separated from existing rural nei�hborhoods by the Orono Schools, by existing wetlands,by the existing railroad and freeway corridor. Because of these separations, development at hi�her densities will have minimal impact on adjacent or nearby rural character neighborhoods. Development of this Group will be required to adhere to the principles of Conservation Design. Parcel Group 3 9 acres east of Willow Drive between Glendale Drive and new Hwy 12 Background,Site Characteristics Planned Development Current Development Parameters Status This acreage is the northerly portion of a Qroup of Conversion from rural An urban-density SFR properties reguided in the 2000-2020 CMP to allow residential use(1 unit per 2 development including for development of urban density single family acres)to an urban residential, eiaht new 1/3-acre lots was homes. The southerly portion of the oriQinal group high density residential use at completed in 2006 on the remains zoned 2-acre rural residenrial development, a densiry of 10-]5 units per southerly portion of the to be rezoned to RPUD at a density of 2-3 units per acre. ori�inal 20-30 acre group. acre as development occurs. New development at urban The northerly 9 acres The northerly 9 acres is reguided via this Update to density will be required to comprising Group 3 allow for multi-family residential use. adl�ere to the principles of contain the recently Conservation Desian. constructed Long Lake Fire Municipal sewer is potentially available via `� Station#1 and one existing connections to either the Hackberry neigllborhood single-family residence. system or the Fire Station extension, both of which dischar�e to the Long Lake sewer system. The area is traversed by a small creek, and is characterized by gently sloping uplands. The]ocation between two � areas of denser development make this is an appropriate location for higher density residential uses. Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 3 A 3.5 acre site located adjacent to the Long Lake Fire Station is owned by the City of Orono. This site is currently under consideration for affordable/workforce housin�. Parcel Group 4 Property at 2040 Wayzata Boulevard (NW uadrant of Wa zata Blvd and Brown Road North) Background,Site Characteristics Planned Development Parameters Current Development Status Site located near downtown Long Lake Subject to covenants ensuring use of 62-unit senior independent was re-�uided in 2000-2020 CMP to the property remains senior housinb. living building was constructed allow for a senior housing facility. on the property in 2001. Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 4 City owns the site, owner of Orono Woods Senior Housing has 100-year lease; only TiF project in Qrono; 20%of units must remain available to persons with less than 50%of area median income. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-34 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Parcel Group 5 The 10.4 acres identified as PINS 35-118-23 43 0003 & 35-118-23 44 0005 located westerly of existing Wayzata Boulevard,easterly of the new Highway 12 corridor,south of the Luce Line Trail and north of the Wayzata city boundary. Background,Site Characteristics Nature of Surroundina Propertv. Residential property to the west and east of Parcel Group 5 (PGS) is guided and zoned for single family residentia] use at a density of 1 unit per 2 acres. The property west across the Highway 12 corridor has been developed with low-density SFR use for many years. The property directly across Wayzata Boulevard to the east contains a church building that has undergone a variety of tenants, and is currently serving as a Montessori school (being reguided to institutional use). The cemetery property to the immediate south in the city of Wayzata is �uided for institutional uses and is zoned for Low Density ResidentiaL Lots to the north of the Luce Line in the city of Long Lake are guided for sin�le family uses (R-I) with a minimum lot area of 10,000 s.f. and 75' width, i.e. SFR at 4 units per acre. However, the existing sin�le family lots abutting the north side of the Luce Line in this area range from 1/4 acre to 1-2/3 acres in area. Current Zonin�and Land Use Plan Status. PG-5 is zoned RR-1 B Sinale Family Rural Residential, which allows the development of single family homes at a density of 1 unit per 2 dry buildable acres, and is within the defined Rural Area of Orono as shown on CMP Map 3B-2. PG5 was mapped and guided for Rural Residential Use in the 2000- 2020 Land Use Plan. PG-5 was re-guided in 2007 to allow for residei�tial development at a density of 1.43 units per acre to allow development of 9 detached dwellin�s on the site. Because that project did not proceed, the rezoning to RPUD did not take effect. MUSA. Municipal Utilities Status. The property was added to the MUSA in 1987. Municipa] sewer and water are potentially available to the site from the City of Wayzata via a proposed extension of the Wayzata systems to serve the nearby Myrtlewood neighborhood. Basis for Amendment. The 2000-2020 CMP indicates that to more closely approach the development density goals established by Metropolitan Council, Orono has defined certain areas of the City where conversion from planned Rural densities to planned Urban densities is appropriate. These are areas where provision of urban services can be efficient, cost-effective, and have the least ne�ative impacts on the City's environmental goals and on surrounding development. In defining where urban areas should be located, the City considers proximity to existing hibher density development; proximity to existin� municipal sewer lines with available capaciry; proximiry to existing urban services; adjacency to eaisting transportation corridors; and ]ocation high in the watershed to limit stormwater impacts. Parcel Group 5 was not identified for change from Rural to Urban in the 2000-2020 CMP. Further,this 2008-2030 CMP establishes a number of policies which generally do not support the conversion of Rura] land to Urban status. However, certain factors that suggest such a change is appropriate for PGS include: l. The property is essentially an"orphan", with relatively little relationship to the development that surrounds it,i.e. it is surrounded on three sides by transportation corridors (Old 12, New 12, Luce Line Trail); it is topographically disconnected from the primarily single family residential uses to the north; and it abuts a cemetery on the south. This lack of connectivity to surrounding residential areas makes use of the site for a "family friendly"neighborhood unattractive and poorly inarketable at best. 2. The potential for non-residential institutional, public or private uses for the site under the current Land Use Plan and low-density zoning is limited by the size of the site, and vehicular access limitations. 3. Vehicular access to the site has limitations due to existin; and future expected traffic patterns and adjacent roadway confi;urations, suggesting that a low intensity residential use should be favored over potentially hi�her- intensity uses that might be available via a conditional use permit. 4. The property is at a location highly visible to traffic entering Orono from the east. Development at this site might be considered as a `main entrance' to Orono, and as such will inherently set a tone as to the character of the City, and therefore a visually low-intensity use of the site should be strived for. City of Orono Communit3� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-35 � CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan 5. The property abuts the Luce Line Trail,which as it traverses Orono has a completely different feel than it does in Plymouth to the east;a rura] feel rather than a suburban feel. Development of a 50 unit residential building rather than 9 individual buildings is anticipated to result in a more compact, centered footprint, not as spread out as the previously approved 9 single family homes. This has a potential to then retain more of the long views to the southwest enjoyed by trail users, given that those views are now of a freeway and railroad corridor. Due to the trail crossing of the freeway immediately west of the property, this is one of the very few locations in Orono traversed by the trail where denser development might not seem out of place. 6. Residential development at a densiry of 2 or more units per dry buildable acre would be inconsistent with eaisting and expected residential development surrounding tlle property. While the property in Lon� Lake to the north is zoned to allow up to 4 units per acre, it has developed in the past with a wide ran�e of lot sizes and at a substantially lower density than it is zoned for. The above factors suggest that this location lends itself to a low- inte��sity, low-profile multi-family use such as senior assisted living. The traffic �enerated by this use would be limited, and the profile of the residents would not require immediate adjacency to most urban amenities. Therefore,development of such a use at a density of up to 10-15 dwelling units per acre would be appropriate for the site. Planned Development Parameters Land Use Plan Amendment-2009 In addition to the permitted, conditional and accessory uses allowed within the RR-lB zoning district, this amendment allows for residential development of Parcel Group 5 at a density of 10-]5 dwelling units per net dry buildable acre (i.e. exclusive of wetlands and required wetland buffers). Based on the net area being 5.9 acres, this would allow a minimum of 59 units. The following parameters shall be adhered to for any residential development of PG-5 at a density greater than 0.5 units per net dry buildable acre of land: 1. All dwellin� units shall be contained within a single residential building that shall not e�ceed two (2) stories in height and have a footprint of no greater than 20,000 square feet. 2. The residential building shall maintain a low-profile and be designed in a residential architectural style that blends with the natural surroundin�s of the site. � 3. The development shall be subject to the PUD development process, and shall be rezoned to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development. The entirety of the property shall be so developed as a single PUD project. 4. The development shall be served with municipal sewer and water. 5. The development shall adhere to all regulations of the City with respect to wetland protection. 6. The development shall adhere to the principals of Conservation Design as established through the Orono Rural Oasis visioning process. 7. Site development shall be desiQned and constructed in such a manner that projects a rural character as viewed from Wayzata Boulevard as motorists enter the cities of Orono and Long Lake from the east. 8. Site development shall be desianed and constructed in such a manner that minimizes the visual impact of density as viewed from the Luce Line Trail. 9. Site vehicular access shall be via a single connection to Wayzata Boulevard. * This table corresponds with Map 3B-7. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-36 CNIP Part 3B. Land tise Plan � URBAN COMMERCIAL LAND USE Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. NAVARRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be the crossroads center of Navarre. This area will provide sufficient opportunity for neiahborhood retail and service businesses, plus adequate professional offices, to serve the needs of most Orono residents. Accessory functions such as offices and owner-occupied living units or limited inulti-family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian-friendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in I�Tavarre to allo�� for an expanded range of neiQhborhood seivices and local small business opportunities. The Navarre Commercial Distnct extends alona either side of Shoreline Di-ive from the intersection of County Roads 1� and 19 westward to the Orono-Spring Park border, and alon� both sides of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue to Lydiard Avenue. The commercial uses alonb these intersectin� comdors are typically only one tier deep, with virtually all commercial properties abutting either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Additionally, the commercial properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among them, inaking for a somewhat frayniented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. AlonQ these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential, hence the business uses in many cases are in close proximity to individual homes. Past City planning efforts for the Na��arre area have identified a number of challenaes to be addressed as I�avai-re redevelops in the years to come: 1) HiQh traffic volumes and the e�istin� traffic mana�ement infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestrians have limifed options for crossing CR 1� or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and infle�ibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of the PR.R lot) requires that bus patrons cross CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2) Parking a�•ailability is a limitin� factor for expansion or redevelopinent of existing businesses. 3) Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as w�ell as financial constraints. _� � Cit`• of Orono Communit�- NTanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 38-37 CMP Part 3B. Land lise Plan 4) Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local businesses to survive and thrive, reducina the incentive to redevelop. y �j There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existin� buildinQs. Navarre hasn't decided whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the street, parking in the rear) or suburban (buildings set back, parking at the front) in character. 6) Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neiahborhood can become an issue. 7) Expansion of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8) Introduction of hiaher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL AREA An additional commercial area is designated along Old Hi�hway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono ��ill coordinate its coinmercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Lona Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downto«�n retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neiQhborhood scale rather than `bia box' regional scale development. The types of retail uses ��ill be those that focus on providing services to fhe residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, «�hile also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Hiahway 1? corridor. However, the retail development is not to dra�� substantial traffic fr•om beyond Orono. The development plans for the Hiahway 12 area will encouraQe locally-owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Lon� Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian-friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks alonQ the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gatherinQ place for the public. Cih� of Orono Communih-1�lanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-38 � . ��.�� - I�`V t S l o�1 S � CMP Part 3B. Land l��se Plan Urban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require,and to financially support, municipal sewer and water services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreational facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas. on the other hand. have limited densit� and have em�ironmental restraints prohibitin� urban density eneroachments. The existing rural densities do not requi��e extensive public services and. in fact,could not economically support an urban service level. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have neti residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods. Economic development will likely be ]imited to neighborhood services in the existing Navarre Area, and ereater utilization of the industrial and commercial potential near Long Lake. While a significant amount of higher density housine will be developed to accommodate a wider range of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively lo��(development in this olanning period will ranee from 0.5 to 15 units er acre�-a�rging€rem 1 ani��er aer�F� es rnt�eh as 1� �niF�-�e�aEre, � '*��. 3nditi idaal rn�}�i €amil�—s+�es—,��g�—as�-3—�s--p�--as�e) because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. � The rural area is expected to have continued residential development at a slow, steady pace. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. With the large percentage of wetlands, steep slopes and public open space, the majority of the i-ural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot,��ith an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least � dry buildable acres. When wetlands, roads. steep slopes and public open space are factored in,nearly 80%of thc City's land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's em�ironmcntal protection goals. The net developed density will be not more than 1 unit per 2 acres of dry-buildable land(0.� units per acre),this being determined on a detailed review of individual site conditions. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and development objectives of Orono. The 19�0's and 1960's were years of great expansion and reliance upon the powers of science and industry to solve all problems. Population graphs showed gro�vth projections running off the paper. Suburbs boomed while core cities were fightin� for their very survival. The 1970's brought a new environmental a��areness and an understanding that nature, not science was the key to our planet's survival. This simpl}�caught up to Orono's environmental protection philosophy that has driven development of the City since the 19�0's. City of Orono Communih-Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-]0 r � CMP Part 3B. Land l�se Plan The Twin Cities metro area continues to expand both in population and in territory covered. Suburban developments continue to appear at the urban-rural fringes and have expanded past the Metropolitan Council's jurisdictional limits into surrounding counties and even into Wisconsin. Pressures have mounted to control this "urban spraw]". focused at redevelopment of the core cities. greater use of higher density infill development in the inner ring suburbs. and greater density of new development at the developing fi•inge. Hand-in-hand with the attempts to curb urban sprawl have been pressures (and a real need) to provide new housing to meet the needs of a population that is widely diverse in age ranges, lifestyles.and ineome levels. Orono's ultimate population projections have been dropping from estimates of 37,000 made in 1970, to 23,000 in 1972, to 14,000 in 1974, to 11.000 in 1979. Population trends during the last 30 years and a careful analysis of development capabilities of remaining land as compared to Orono's current zoning and land use � plan, suggest an ultimate population of around �9899.800. This figure is very close to Orono's current (2008) estimated population of 7,800. This downward trend over the last 3 decades is clearly a result of Orono's 197� city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reacting to environmental concerns reearding protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. The projected population is in line with and a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Seivices(MCES). Table 3B-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 -2030 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts � Population �i 1'ear 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- 5,800 7,000 7,300 Unsewered -- -- I -- -- 2,500 i 2,j00 �,500 i Total City 6,787 6,845 j 7,285 7,538 i 8,300 � 9,500 9,800 f� i Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- — -- �,�56 �,950 3,020 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 944 1,000 1,080 Total City 2,146 2,291 � 2,613 2,766 3,200 3,950 4,100 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2 7; ?59 2 41 2.39 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement City of Orono Communih M1lanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-11 CMP Part3B. Land t�se Plan �Table 3B-1: no Population Projections (March 2008) �'`�. Population Forecasts Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 �2010 ' 2020 2030 UrbanArea(1/2&1ac.) 4,160 3. 4.135 4,063 4,600 ,0�0 �,760 Rural Area (2&5 ac.) 2,627 2.850 "0 3,475 �, �0 3,600 3,840 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7, 8,150 � 8,650 9,000 Occupied ouseh Forecasts* Year 1970 � 1980 i 990 2000 2 i2020 2030 Urban Area(1/2& 1 ac.) �,316 l,� � 1,483 1.491 1,775 100 2,1�0 Rural Area(2&5 ac.) 830 954 1,130 1.27� 1,37� � 1.5 1_600 Total City 46 � 2,291 2,613 2,766 3,150 3,600 3, _ Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 ' ?.59 2.40 2.40 Sources: 1 .. 00 U.S.Census data and City records;2010-2030 Metropolitan Council forecasts; City records and forecasts. *Does not include vacant dwelling units Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on Highway 12 throu�h Orono and Long Lake. A new 2-lane limited access 'through' route paralleling Highway 12 from Orono's eastern border to the Co.Rd.6 intersection was completed and opened to traftic in December 2008,dramatieally decreasing the traffic levels on Old High�e�ay 12 and providing a more attractive alternative to County Road l� for commuters from Mound. Minnetrista and points west. Environmental and social pressw•es have permanently eliminated any plans for expansion of Count�° Road l� along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traific away fi•om the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans�vere revised three decades ago in response to Oronds plans for low-density development. Original plans called for sewering all of Orono with capacity for 37,000 people. But the final Orono-Lone Lake Interceptor was relocated and is in place with a design capacity for less than 8.400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's. the Maple Plain Interceptor ��as similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capaeity limitations are consistent with Orono's em�ironmental concerns for the rw•al area and with MCES regional concerns including the limited design capacity and massive environmental discharge problems associated tiith the central sewage collection and treatment s��stems. Orono's commercial and economic development has always beeo centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment. education and social needs of Orono residents have been more than amply met by commercial facilities City of Orono Communih Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-12 CMP Part 3B. Land Gse Plan and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Rural and urban residents alike utilize these facilities and in fact,the commercial vitalitv of the neighboring cities relies in part upon the regional service area that includes all of Orono. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all ptanned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. The forecast population increase of�2 000 persons in the next twenty years translates into a housing "demand" of approximately 689-800 new dwelling units when deereasing household sizes are taken into account. This average of�5-3940 new dwellines per year is consistent with or slightly below Orono's rate of actual ne�� residence building permit issuance during the past two decades. Based on the Land Use Plan. approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. New urban housine will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on seattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including miaed single family and attached townhome dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels in the Navarre area and on larger parcels designated for urban development in the Highway 12/Long Lake area; �^a�,r �� ^'� '^"'' ^'' '' "' higher densitv residential alone the Hiehwav ]2 corridor; and hi�her densitv residential in the form of Mired Use Development in the Navarre Commercial District. Other new units will be in the form of replacement or conversion of existing seasonal or substandard dwellines � especially along the lakeshore. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dre-buildable area. all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, ne�a� low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regiona] capacit}� and the differing levels of service required respectively by urban and rural neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capaciry is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area, but there is insufficient capacity for any major expansion of the existing urban area to densities commensurate with Metropolitan Council goals of 3.0 units per acre for all new sewered development.All new rura] non-Shoreland development is intended to be permanently self-sufficient in tenns of on-site sewage treatment. In the event that existing rural neighborhoods outside the 2008-2030 MUSA are identified as having significant on-site system failures with no on-site alternatives for sewage City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-13 CMP Part 3B. Land L'se Plan proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase from multiple small developments. 18. No land will be developed unless its location and characteristics are suitable for the proposed use in accordance with this plan. Land to be developed must be of such size,character and location that it can be safelv used for the intended purpose without danger to health,without peril from fire, flood or other occurrence and without undue impact upon neighboring properties. No ]and will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage. soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities. or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. URBAN LAND USE POLICIES 1. The majority of Orono's urban area will be reserved for residential land use. Orono's urban residential neighborhoods will provide the � opportunity for a variety of housing rypes and price ranges. Many urban residences will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive em�ironmental I conditions. Medium and Hieh�Densit} �� ^^�*� ^�^^^��`_multi-famil�� residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation services. but will not be appropriate within ],000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. 2. Limited commercial areas will be provided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercia] areas will be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directiv necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature(i.e."big box"retail)which � would increase traffic. partieularly on collector streets serving low densit�� residentia] development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commereial Develooment is tareeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas wi11 be provided for public access and limited lake-user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require Cih of Orono Community n4anagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-19 C!�1P Part 3B. Land Gse Plan 9. The existing urban area will not be expanded. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Except in limited cases, as defiined bv this�an.�the urban service area will not be expanded into the detined rural area and urban services and facilities will not be extended into the rural area for purposes of fosterin� or allo�ving increased development density in those areas. 10. The design and density of urban development will be controlled to assure protection of light, air and solar access for neighboring properties. Requirements for minimum lot size. amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum building heights will be desiened to assure protection of these values for all urban residents. ll. A significant amount of natural woodiands and open space will be retained on each property. Retentio❑ of the natural environment requires careful siting and preservation of trees and open spaee on each urban property. l2. Land use standards wiil limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural veeetation. Lake use reeulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City regulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat stora�e. l3. Retention of natural vegetation wi❑ limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heiehts�°ill be limited to less than the typical tree hei�ht. Minimum green belts will be provided w°ith prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except ��hen absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. RURAL LAND USE POLICI ES 1. Orono's rural area will be reserved for permanent low-density residential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commereial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs. marshland assimilative capacit� precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore. the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low-density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted City of Orono Community Vlanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3[3-21 CMP Part 3B. Land [ise Plan in the rural area. 2. Orono's rural service area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses,orchards,truck farms, riding stables and recreation areas sueh as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more erowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properiies. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. 3. Rural density is limited by natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including extensive wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, which factors influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. 4. The existing rural area will not be urbanized. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Exeept in limited cases as identified in this plan, �the urban service area will not be expanded into the rural area. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and rural land use density will be maintained at a level to ensure that private on-site sewer systems will operate satisfactorily and that rural wetlands and drainage�vays ��ill not be overloaded with storm water nutrient pollution. 5. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Eatension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or ��ater eannot be economically,justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. 6. Rural land uses do not require municipal sewer service. Orono's soil, topography and low-density rural land use provide the ingredients necessan� to assure safe, adequate, permanent on-site sewage treatment and waste water disposal without hazard to ground water. surface water or the public health. Extension of sewer service to properties in the rural area will be avoided, except when necessary to protect the public health, or to avoid or eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. Future expansions of the sewer system into the Rural Area to solve existing neighborhood sewage treatment problems or along the lakeshore to avoid or eliminate potential negative impacts on lake water quality, will not result in a reclassification of those neighborhoods from Rural to Urban. Expansion of the se��er system into the Rural Area will not result in the provision of additional urban services, nor will it result in changes to allowed development densities. Cit� of Orono Communih Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-22 C!VIP Part 3B. Land l:se Plan 4. Approve and permit proposed housing developments in light of'population forecasts, existing housing stock, and current and future community and regional needs, as appropriate. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2011-2020. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7-county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the eomprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element of the implementation program is a housing implementation pro�ram, '`...including official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan,whieh will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing." Orono's share is forecasted at 31l new affordable housing units for the decade 2011-2020. In order to establish whether suitably positioned land and resources are available ,_.--- Fo�matced:H�9ni�9nt �--------- -- -- — — --- -- -- ---- -- ---- — -- --- to address Oronds forecasted share of the regional affordable housing need, the Developable Land Analysis originally completed in 1999 has been updated far 2008. Table 3B-2: Residential Land Use Capacity by Zoning District & �� MUSA Status-2008(see following page)provides an analysis of the current and � future state of residential development in Orono,defining the numbers of existing � and potential homes that can be developed under current and planned zoning. � This analysis was completed by reviewing the additional development capacity of each of Oronds approximately 4000 tax parcels,taking into account the available land area,wetlands,potential road needs,etc. Map 3B-5 depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2000. As shown in Table 3B-3: Worksheet A - Existing Land Use Summary, nearl� 91% of Orono's land is devoted to residential or parks&open space uses. Map 3B-6 indicates the detailed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use ma��ill form the basis for land use zoninR decisions. �.f. Tab1e 3B-3: Orono`Existin Land Use(2008) � Land L'se Categon� Acreage � %of Citv � � � Rural Residential � 2.709 17.6% �� Single Familv Rural Residential 1,274 7.9% ��i Low Density Residential 1,965 12.9% � � Single Family Medium Density 1,214 7.9% i � Residential , High Densin�Residential 67 0 4% ��J Commercial 44 0.3% �� City of Orono Communit� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-28 , CMP Part 3B. Land Lise Plan Office 31 02% Industrial 42 0.3% Institutional 234 l.5°/o i ;� ) �� Park/OpenSpace 1,796 11J% j �l-� Open Water 5244 34.1% f � Railroad 114 07�0 Rinhi-ot-�1'a)' �— 682 � 4.�°io ' � 'TOTAL '15,356 100% Source� F.sistine Land Use Mar � Table 3B-3: 2008 Orono Existi�g Land Use Summary (Met Council"Worksheet A") Based on 2000-2U20 Ci�1P Guide lan ML'S.� Acres '\on- MUSA Total %of Existing Land Use Acres Acres Citv Developed lindeveloped Total Single Family Residential 3,324 153 3,477 4,3�1 7.828 76J% (developed and vacant) Multi-family Residential* 66 35 101 0 ]0 1.0% (develo ed and vacant) Commercial 6 � 14 78 0 78 0.8% Industrial 44 0 44 �- � 44 Q4% Public and Semi-public 187 7��- 194 22 216 2.1 % � (Institutional) Agricultural 0 0 0 332 332 3.3% Parks/Recreation/ 215 0 215\ 1.386 1.601 1�J% Open Space � Total Land Acreage(Incl 3,900 9 4,109 6, 10,200 100% wetlands&roads,excl lakes) Land That Is Restricted For Development Environmental Restrictions Wetlands -- -- 6�7 918 1,575 1�.4% Lakeshore Setbacks incl.Bluffs(est.) -- -- 370 80 450 4.4% Open S ace Easem'ts (est.) -- — 1� 90 105 1.0% Public&Semi-Public tise Restrictions Roadways 329 75 344 440 784 7J% Public/Semi-Public Uses 187 7 194 22 216 2 1% Public Parks/Rec/Open Space 215 0 275 1,386 1,601 l�J% Total Area of Land With Develo ment Restrictions 1,795 ac. 2,936 ac. 4,731 ac. 46.3% *MFR includes: Navarro- 10 ac./Lk Mtka Woods- 10 acl0rono Sr Hse-4 ac/Stonebav-42 ac./ Comforts of Home site- ]0 ac./Dumas&James prop-25 ac. F�ture Land Use Projections Tables 3B-4a thru 3B-4e comprise Warksheet B - Projecting Future Land Use as City of Orono Communit� Vlanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-29 CMP Part 3B. Land l:se Plan required by Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook. The followin� notes apply to these tables � 1. \umber of households=number of dwelling units x 9S%occupancy 2. Total Residential Acres figures used to calculate densities include wetland and right-of-way acreage but exclude lands devoted to Commercial/ Industrial/Parks,Open Space and Trails/Public and Semi-public uses. .;� _ ' `a��nsi .�,pf��2esidentia�DevE10 m�nfi��., r='; , .- , �,� �� Single Acres ' Family Acres Public Acres Acres Net Land Use #of Multi Acres Wetland& Parks/ Arterial , Other Net Density � (Planned linits Family# Gross water- Open Roads lin-developed Res � Units/ Dev.Areas) (Ta et) I of linits Resid. bodies S ace ROW Land Acres I Acre (((�� H=GD- � A B C D ' E � F G E-F-G (A+B)/H Med-High(A) - 441 101.91 44.06 - - 0 �7.85 7.62 � � High(B) - 90 8.94 0 - - 0 8.94 ]0.07 High(C) - 59 10.43 4.58 - - �� , 0 5.85 10.09 Low(D) 4 - 7.32 � 0 j - - 0 7.32 0.55 � Low(E) 58 �� - �� 130 96 ' 15.12 I - - 0 l l�_R4 0 5 �4i�cd lise(I) - I 176 '� 34�6 I 5.26 � - �� - 0 ' 29 30 6 01 �TOTAY, ;� ,�.:�, :62 766 : 244.12 69.02 _ _ 0 225.10 3.68 "'Chis table corresponds with D9ap 3B-X. Table 3B-4a: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 (Met Council Worksheet B-1 Ezisting S Futurc Development Within Current(2000-2020) 11L;SA Forecasted Projected Household Density Acres lnfiu Total Households** (households/gross acres) Acres and Resid'tl / (95%of total Vacant Redvlp'mt Acres* `� connections) Single-family Multi-family Developable \ Land 2010 ��55�9s=2240 2140 x.95/3477 = 0.58 215�95/10] = 2.02 - 188 3,578 � 201� 2650 x.95=2520 2312 x.95/3477 = 0.63 338 x.95/101 = 3.18 - 120 3,578 2020 2890 a.95=2740 2452� 95/3477 = 0.67 438 x.95/101 = 4.12 - 3� 3.578 2025 2930 x.95=2785 2492 x.95/3477 = 0.68 4S8 x.95/101 = 4.12 - 10 3.578 2030 3965 x.95=2820 2527 x.9�/3477 = 0.69 438 x 95/101 = 4.12 - 0 3_578 "Gross acreage in current MGSA is 4,109 acres;residential acreage per Table 3B-3 is 3,578 acres **Same HH forecasts as used in CSPP -see Table 4G2a Multi-family units inventory-existing and projected: 1)Navarro twinhomes: 24 units on 9.4 acres Existing 2)Lake Mtka Woods to��nhomes: 29 units on 10 acres Existing 3)Orono Woods Sr.Housing: 62 units on 4 acres Eaisting City of Orono Communih�11anagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-30 CMP Part 3B. Land I se Plan 4)Stonebay townhomes/condos: 100 units existing+57 more on 42 gross acres(by 2015) �)Comforts of Home Sr.Asst'd Living: 46 units- 10.4 acres(by 2015) 6)Sr.Hsg.behind LL Fire Station: 20 units-3 acres(by 207 5) 7)SW quadrant of OCB Rd/Wayzata Blvd.: 100 units-2�acres(by 2020) Table 3B-4b:Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 (Met Council Worksheet B-2) Existing& Future Development In Proposed MUSA Expansions 2008-2030 Projected Household Densit�• Total Residential Acres \ Forecasted (houscholds/gross acre) Gross acreage in proposed MUSA � Households ezpansions is 11.8 acres;residential Singlc-family Multi-family acreage is 11.8 acres 2010 5 �/1 1.8 = 0.42 (None) 11.8 2015 � 5/1 I.S = 0.42 (None) ll.8 2020 5 5/1 I.8 = 0.42 (None) 1].8 2025 5 5/1 I.8 = 0.42 (None) 11.8 2030 5 5/1 1.8 = 0.42 (None) 1 I.8 Notc: This table is based on 8�0 N'ayzata Blvd not being added to the MUSA Table 3B-4c: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 (Met Counc�i worksheec B-3) Ezisting R 1�uturc C nse�cered Dc��elopment (Outside l�;xisting/Proposed �71�5:�) Projected Household Density Total Residential Acres Forecasted (households/ ross acre) Gross acreage outside Households Single-family Multi- existing/proposed MUSA is � family 6,079 acres;residential gross acreageK is 4,683 acres \ 2010 1000 x.9�=950 9�0/4683 = 0.20 (None) 4,683 2015 920 x 9�=875 875/4683 = 0.19 (None) 4.683 2020 910 x.9�=865 86�/4683 = 0.18 (None) 4.683 202� 950 x.95=905 905/4683 = 0.19 (None) 4.683 2030 985 x 9�=935 935/4683 = 0.20 (None) 4.6R3 *Residential Gross.qcrea�e includes SPR/MFR and Agricultural Land as sho�a�n on Table 3B-3 Table 3B-4d: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 Summary of Projected Total Households 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Sewered 2256 2603 2950 2985 3020 � �(� � 1 v - �v l City of Orono Communit� Ntanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-31 2� ✓ CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Unsewered 944 972 1000 1040 1080 Total H ouseholds 3200 3575 3950 4025 4100 Persons cr Household 2.59 2.45 2.51 2.40 2.50 Total Population 8300 8.330 9500 8.870 9800 Table 3B-4d:Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 (Met Council Worksheet B-4) Summary of Projected Total Househoids / Cl 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 �` Existing MUSA 2240 2520 2740 2785 2830 �/ Pro osed VIL'SA � 5 5 5 5 �� \` ' Outside MUSA 950 875 86� 905 9�5 Total Households 3195 3400 3610 3695 3760 Persons er Household 2.59 2.45 2A0 2_40 2 40 Total Po ulation 8.150 8,330 8,6�0 8.870 9.000 Total Dwelline Units 3350 3580 3800 3890 39i0 `^� V'J Table 3B-4e: Future land Use Projections 2010-2030 � Forecasted Employment 2010-2030 , !1 Sewered Unsewered Total �V� �b Em lovment �� 2010 1230 0 1230 � �/ � � 2015 1325 0 132� � � 2020 1420 0 1420 � 202a 1460 0 1460 2030 1500 0 1500 � � � ��/r Table 3B-4e: Future Land Use Projections 2010-2030 (Met Council Worksheet B-5) , (�„� Forecasted E ployment 2010-2030 v-l. Outside V1'ithin Existing MUSA Within Proposed: li'SA Existin roposed Total M Em lovment 2010 1335 0 3� ]3 2015 142� 0 0 146� 2020 1515 0 40 I555 2025 155� 0 4 1595 2030 1595 0 40 163� City of Orono Communit3°14anagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-32 CMP Part 3B. Land l�se Plan � �� ' �e;�$�XXi Orono 2030 Planned Land Use � 2030 Land Use Categories 2010 201� '� 2020 2025 2030 � � '� Acreage � � ( Rural 1,214 1,214 1,214 1?14 'I 1,314 '� � Rural Residential 2,677 2,677 2,677 2,677 i, 2,677 ' � � Low Density Residential 1,921 1,921 1,921 ' 1,92] ' 1,921 � �/� � ' Low-Medium Density Residential 1,209 1,209 1.209 1,209 � 1,?09 ' �� ` � Medium Density Residential 52 52 52 52 I 52 � i Medium-High Densiry Residential 102 102 102 102 102 � �I High Densitv Residential 23 23 23 23 23 � Mixed Use 35 3� 3� 35 3� � Commercial 32 32 32 32 32 Office 20 20 20 20 20 Industrial 42 42 42 42 42 Park,Recreational,and Open Space 1,785 1,785 1,785 1,785 1,785 Institutional 227 227 227 227 227 Open Water 5,244 5,244 5,244 5,244 5,244 2ailroad 114 114 114 114 1]4 Rieht-of=Wa}' 6�9 659 659 659 6�9 TOTAL 15,356 15,356 15,356 15,356 15,356 URBAN LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE Urban residential development will retain the basic single family character of the community but will also provide for a wider range of housing types at generally low densities consistent with available services. the natural amenities of the land. and environmental protection. Planning devices such as clusterina v�-i11 permit a limited amount of multiple dwellings such as patio homes. towmhouses and garden apartments to be located near commercial areas within the overall planned density of the neighborhood. Urban residential development requires municipal sanitary sewer. an adequate transportation system.neighborhood recreational facilities and other typica] urban services.The location of urban residential uses depends to a substantial degree on the environmental impact on Lake Minnetonka and the protection of the natural wetlands system for storm water filtration and purification. All urban residential land within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka ��ill require special environmental restrictions and lower land use densities in order to assure shoreline protection and minimal direct storm water runoff pollution. Cit,y of Orono Community�lanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-33 CMP Part 3B. Land Cise Plan � id-�p��" LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -�-0.� to � �"��'-�-.,-T�:QUNITS PER ACRE This is the typical urban residential densitv developed and planned for areas which are within 1.000 feet of Lake Minnetonka and ��hich have particular environmental impact on the lake. id�n��^r.—'`� LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - 2 '-'�"t'nm.T T-��to 3 LJNITS-PER ACRE This is the typical land use density of the historic development in Navan�e and the older residential neighborhoods. Certain other residential areas are planned for this density where services are available beyond 1,000 feet from the lakeshore. Municipal water is generally provided to these districts for supply and fire protection,in addition to the necessary sewer service. � d��.-'`' MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENT]AL - 3 to�7 �"x1z'',z,�Q�UNITS PER ACRE These densities are provided for along Highway ]2 as sho�vn on the Land Use Plan. Development at these densities will be limited to properties �vhere special conditions such as abutting land use, as well as proximity to urban utilities and services, would make the parcel appropriate for housing clusters or multi-family development. Since the areas identified for this higher density development are to some extent limited by environmental constraints,each such development must be analyzed and reviewed on an individual basis. The properties identified for � residentia] development at densities of 3-�7 units per acre include properties guide-planned for such use as a result of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1988. as�vell as properties heretofore planned for sinele famil} development at rural densities. All identified properties are located relatively high in the Lake Minnetonka watershed, allowing ample opportunit}� for effective stormwater management. �A�'-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - ^�noc -runri c rn,n-rc �_" D�r D��7 to ]0 LJNITS PER ACRE This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to � be so uniquely situated that residential development at a density exceeding 6-7 units per acre will have no negative impacts on the surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into co�sideration in determining the appropriate locations for this densiry will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Sites proposed for this density will be analyzed and reviewed on an individual basis. Properties proposed for this density shall be outside the Shoreland Overlav District._The initial areas tarQeted for inclusion into this land use desienation are alon� Hi�hway 12, near the more intense commercial and industrial land uses west of Lon Lake. City of Orono Communih Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-34 CMP Part 3B. Land lise Plan HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL— 10 to 1� UNITS PER ACRE This land use desienation is reserved for sqecific sites based on their proximity to services and transoortation corridors are deemed appropriate for hisher densiri� projects. MIXED USE—6 to 1� UNITS PER ACRE The Mixed Use Residential and Commercial desi�nation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transoortation routes to introduce an element of higher densitv residential. This residential component will serve to au�ment the commercial uses with a near-by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. Properties identified for urban densities of�-63=7 units per acre or�7- 1� units per acre. alon�Hi�hwav 12. are detailed in the following tables and maps,which identify required development parameters. Table 3B-5: HiEhway 12 Areas 6�te�ec�Pronosed for u:^~^~"^~^:��.D��;a^^�:^' � II £kwele�ttteFt�Multi-Familv Residential Uses* PaPCeI CYOup 1 50-acre site located north uf Old HighH•a��12(�'1'a��zata Blvd) behveen VVillow Drive and Old Crystal Ba Road Bacl:ground,Site Characteristics Planned Development Parameters Current Development Status 1988 CMP Amendment#2 guided l. An east-west service road(Kelley As of January 2009 Kelley this area for a combined Parkway)will be developed to connect Parkway has been completed and � commercial and townhome Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow opened. development Drive.This will alloti�for one tier of North of Kelley,development of Munici al facilities were developable lots between Kelley � � Parkway and 13ighway 12,such lots to 157 units of MFR is underway, developed at the west end of the have access to Kelley but not to I including a 57 unit condomin�um parcel m 1991,at which time the H�g��,ay�� buildina and]00 rambler and initial segment of Kelley Parkwaq two-story townhome units in was developed. 2. The portion of the property between ; groups of 2 and 3 units. Potential development options for Highway 12 and Kalley Parkway may be South of Kelle >commercial developed ti�ith one uer of commercial y- the remainder oY the site were uses,to include professional office as parcels of 2-5 acres each have generated by the Cit�•in 1998, Well as liinited ser��ice uses,and retail been platted.A medical-dental accounting for extensive wetlands uses accesso to the office use. office has been completed,a and an eaisting Highway 12 ry second medical office and a stormwater pond. The site is very 3. The property north of the service road bank/office combination have flat,with high water table soils, may be developed for a mi�of sinele been approved but construction partially wooded. family and multi-family uses at a density � not yet commenced,and a third of 3-6 units per dry buildable acre. office site remains vacant. Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 1 A stonnwater pond serving the entire 50-acre development site has been developed along Hightia� 12. � Pai'CCl �il'OUP 2 �60 acres located beriveen Wayzata Boulevard and the new Highway � 12/ B�'Railway corridor,abutting and west of Old Crystal Ba�� Road. i Current Development Status: East 18 acres is vacant West 31 acres contains working apple orchard. Cih�of Orono Communih Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-35 CMP Part 3E3. Land lise Plan Bacicground,Site Characteristics �' Planned Development Parameters i� � Property indudes 3-7 separate tax parcels��'�� , Site B Residential Develooment Ootions: .currently zoned for sinele � family rural development at a density of 1 unit per 2 acres. Densih°oarameter Dwcllin�l.inits Dcnsih� New Highway 12 corridor abuts the south side of this Current 2-acre zoning 16-I 8 Units U.3 units/ac. property group. (septic systems) � Gross area��^'�`•�^�^-••��^'^��' �102 ac± 2-acre zoning 20?2 Units 0.4 units/ac. "'''"':��'..�•'��'�Wetlands on site: -4 44 ac (sewered,standard plat) + 2-acre zoning 24 Units 0.5 units/ac. Ale�v He��--1'righ4�f Fva; '?� (sewered,PRD) Net available for development: 49-58 ac+ 1-acre zoning 42-44 Units 0.8 units/ac. � Easterly 25 ac is relatively flat with high-watertable soils (sewered,standard plat) and interspersed wetland pockets. Not easily developable �-acre zoning 47-48 Units 0.9 units/ac. with septic systems. Mostly open fields that have been (sewered.PRD) farmed previously. 1/2-acre zoning 80-85 Units l.S units/ac. Westerly 30 acres has 5%-15%slopes,dropping a total of (sewered,standard plat) 50'down to major wetland basin. Soils are better suited ��2-acre zoning 95-100 Units 1.8 units/ac- for use of septic systems,but slopes may be a factor for (sewered,PRD) individual sites. This area is more wooded and contains 3 unit/acre PRD 140 Units 3.0 units/ac. � apple orchard. Preferred Devclonment Ontion: This property group was incorporated into the MUSA with �'��ef 93 uniEs/ae SFI� the 2000 Comp Plan update. � Medium—Hieh Densitv Residential „�n41 Units �:57.6 units/ac. � Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 2 This site has a number of factors which mahe it unattractive for Z-acre rural residential development as currently zoned,includin¢: - Location between n�o highway corridors is not conducive to rural development. i - Location across from Industrial Park is not conducive to rural development � - Site abuts one of the busiest intersections in Orono. - East half ot�site is poorly suited for development with septic systems. Municipal sewer and water are relatively available as compared to most other areas of the Citv.The site has direct access to arterial and collector road system,and is relatively near urban services as compared to most other areas of the City. Furthermore,the site is separated from existing rural neighborhoods by the Orono Schools,by existing wetlands,by the existing railroad,and by existing and fLture road/railroad corridors.Because of these separations, development at hieher densities will have little impact on adjacent rural character neighborhoods. Development of this site will be required to adhere to the principles of Conservation Design. Pal'CC� �il'OU�3 �8-�g9 acres east of Willow Drive between W'atertown Road and 13\ Rail�ap. Background,Site Characteristics �� Planned Development Current Development Parameters Status This group ot'properties was reeuided in the 2000- ; Conversion from rural This property group 2020 CMP to allow�for development of urban residential use(1 unit per 2 contains a church and the density single family homes.The majority of the acres)to an urban residential, recently constructed Long group remains zoned 2-acre rural residential b'.�`"-�.*""y-a��hiah densit� Lake Fire Station#1.,as development,to be rezoned to RPUD as residential use at a density of � well as six existing single development occurs. Municipal sewer is potentially ]0-?315 units per acre.�#ri� family homes..4n urban- available via connections to either fhe Hackberry .�u"u;=�;a;°^-.�-arr�� density SFR development neighborhood system or the Fire Station extension. " includina eieht new 1/3- City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-36 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan both of which discharge to the Long Lake sewer acre lots was completed in system. The area is traversed by two small creeks, dertsi�y- 2006. and is characterized by genUy sloping uplands. New development at urban While soils are not unsuitable for on-site sewage density will be required to treatment systems,the location between two areas adhere[o the principles of j of denser development make this is an appropriate Conservation Design. i location for higher density residential uses. � Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 3 � A 2-acre site located adjacent to the Long Lake Fire Station is owned by the City of Orono This site has been � considered for possible future MFR senior housine. No density parameters have been assigned tbr such a E development. Parcel Group 4 Property at 2040 Wayzata Boulevard (NVb' uadrant of Wavr.ata Blvd and Brown Road liorth) Background,Site Characteristics � Planned Development Parameters Current Development Status Site located near downtown Long Lake Development of senior housing at 62-unit senior independent � was re-guided in 2000-2020 CMP to this site must be subject to covenants, living building was constructed ; allow for a senior housing facility. zonine controls,or other methods to on the property in 2001. ensure that the use of the property remains senior housing. Additional Development Factors,Parcel Group 4 City owns the site,owner of Orono Woods Senior Housin�has 100-year lease;only TIF pro,ject in Orono;20%of units must remain available to persons with less than 50%of area median income. ` -- — — --- — — ---- ____ --- — — — — ------ --- — --_---- Formatted:Font:l0�t Pat'Cel GI'oup 5 The 10.4 acres identified as PI1S 35-118-23 43 0003&35-118-23 44 OOOi located westerly�of ezisting Highwa�� 12,easterly of the new Highway]2 corridor,south of the Luce Line Trail and north of the Wayzata cit,y boundar��. � ! Background,Site Characteristics Nature of Surcoundine Propertv. Property to the west and east of Parcel Group 5(PG-5)is guided and zoned for single family residential use at a densiry of 1 unit per 2 acres. The property west across the railroad corridor has been developed with Iow-density SFR use for many years. The property across Highway 12 to the east contains a church building that has undereone a variety of tenants, and is eurrently serving as a Montessori school. The , cemetery property to the immediate south in the city of Wayzata is guided for institutional uses and is zoned for Low Density Residential. Lots to the north of tl�e Luce Line in the city of Long Lake are guided for single family uses(R-1)with a minimum lot area of 10,000 s.f.and 75'width,i e.SFR at 4 units per acre. However.the existine � single family lots abutting the north side of the Luce Line in this area range from 1/4 acre to I-2/3 acres in area. Current Zonine and Land Use Plan Status PG-5 is zoned RR-1 B 3ingle Family Rural Residential,which allows the , development of single family homes at a density of 1 unit per 2 dry buildable acres,and is within the defined Rural Area of Orono as shown on CMP Map 3B?. PG-5 was mapped and guided for Rural Residential Use in the 2000- 2020 Land Use Plan.PG-5 was re-guided in 2007 to allow for residential development at a density of 1.43 units per acre to allow development of 9 detached dwelli��gs on the site. Because that project did not proceed,the rezoning to � RPUD did not take effect. � MUSA_Municipal Utilities Status. The property was added to the MUSA in 1987. Municipal sewer and water are � potentially available to the site from the City of Wayzata via a proposed extension of the Wayzata systems to serve I City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 36-37 CMP Part 3B. Land Lise Plan the nearby Myrtlewood neighborhood. Basis for Amendment The 2000-2020 CMP indicates that to inore closely approach the development density goals established by Metropolitan Council,Orono has defined certain areas of the City where conversion from planned - Rural densities to planned Urban densities is appropriate. These are areas where provision of urban services can be efficient,cost-effective,and have the least negative impacts on the City's environmental goals and on surrounding development. In defining where urban areas should be located, the City considers proximity to existine hisher density development; proximity to existing municipal sewer lines with available capacity; proximity to existing � urban services;adjacency to existing transportation corridors;and location high in the watershed to limit stormwater impacts. Parcel Group 5 was not identified for change from Rural to Urban in the 2000-2020 CMP. Further.the 2000-2020 CMP establishes a number of policies which generally do not support the conversion of Rural land to Urban status. However.certain factors that suggest such a chan�e is appropriate for PG-5 include: I. The property is essentially an`orphan",with relatively little relationship to the development that surrounds it,i.e. it is surrounded on three sides by transportation eorridors (OId 12, NeN 12, Luce Line Trail); it is topographically disconnected from the primarily single family residential uses to the north; and it abuts a ceme[ery on the south. This lack of connectivity to surroundin� residential areas makes use of the site for a "family friendly"neighborhood unattractive and poorly marketable at best. 2. The potential for non-residential institutional,public or private uses for the site under the current Land Use Plan and low-density zoning is limited by the size of the site,and vehicular access limitations. 3. Vehicular access to the site has limitations due to existing and future expected traffic patterns and adjacent roadway configurations,suggesting that a low intensity residentiai use should be favored over potentially higher- intensity uses that might be available via a conditional use permit. 4. The property is at a location highly visible to traffic entering Orono from the east.Development at this site might be considered as a`main entrance'to Orono.and as such will inherently set a tone as to the character ofthe City, and therefore a visually low-intensity use of the site should be strived for. 5. The property abuts the Luce Line Trail,which as it traverses Orono has a completely different feel than it does in Plymouth to the east;a rural feel rather than a suburban feel. Development of a 40-�0 unit residential building rather than 9 individual buildings is anticipated to result in a more compact,centered footprint,not as spread out as the previously approved 9 single family homes. This has a potential to then retain more of the long views to the southwest enjoyed by trail users,given that those views are now of a freeway and railroad corridor. Due to the trail erossing of the freeway immediately west of the property,this is one of the very few locations in Orono traversed by the trail where denser development might not seem out of place. 6.Residential development at a density of 2 or more units per dry buildable acre would be inconsistent with existing and expected residential development surrounding the property.While the property in Long Lake to the north is zoned to ailow up to 4 units per acre, it has developed in the past with a wide range of lot sizes and at a substantially lower density than it is zoned for.The above factors suggest that this Iocation lends itself to a low- intensity,low-profile multi-family use such as senior assisted living.The traffic generated by this use would be limited, and the profile of the residents would not require immediate adjacency to most urban amenities. Therefore,development of such a use at a density of up to 10 dwellino units per acre would be appropriate for the site. � Planned Development Parameters Land Use Plan Amendment-2009 In addition to the permitted, conditional and accessory uses allowed within the RR-1B zoning district, this amendment allows for residential development of Parcel Group S at a density of^��-�'"�� '� ''?10-15 dwelling units per net dry buildable acre(i.e.exclusive of wetlands and required wetland buffersj.Based on the net area being 4.9 acres,this would allow a�minimum of�9�}3�units The following parameters shall be adhered to for any residential development of PG-S at a density greater than 0.�units per net dry buildable acre of land: � l. All dwellin� units shall be contained within a single residential building that shall not exceed two (2) , City of Orono Communih Nlanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-38 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential, hence the business uses in many cases are in close proximity to individual homes. Past City planning efforts for the Navan•e area have identified a number of ehallenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to come: 1) High traffiic volumes and the existing traffic management infrastructure result in poor pedestrian aceessibility. Pedestrians have limited options for crossing CR l� or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of�the P&R lot)requires that bus patrons cross CR 1�on at least one leg of their commute. 2) Parking availability is a limiting factor for expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3) Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as wcll as financial constraints. 4) Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allo��local businesses to survive and thrive, reducine the incentive to redevelop. � � 5) There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. Navar•re hasn't decided whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the st�•eet, parking in the rear) or suburban (buildings set back, parking at the front)in character. 6) Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighborhood can become an issue. 7) Expansion of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8) [ntroduction of higher densitv mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan ORONO/LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL AREA. An additional commercial area is designated along Old Highway ]2 (Wayzata Boulevard) where the availabilit� of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake,make commercial use appropriate. City of Oruno Community�lanagement Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-40 1 ♦ CMP Part 3C - Housing Plan 3-23-10 Revisions Summary: P. 3C-3: Added text noting additional 102 acres being re-guided to 6+ units per acre P. 3G8 thru 11: Population and Households Forecasts revised to match Met Council Systems Statement forecasts (text and Table 3G1); text revised to reference new Mixed Use, Medium-High Density Residential and High Density Residential designations in Land Use Plan; deleted text on P. 3C- 11 that addressed inability to meet affordability goals. P. 3C-19/20: Added text on P. 20 noting re-guiding of property in northerly Hackberry area (Parcel Group 3 in Land Use Plan) to multi-family at 1� units per acre. P. 3G25 Revised limited urban area density text from 2-6 to 2-15 units per acre -�__,_� � CMP Part 3C. Housin Plan ♦ l. Develop and imp t comprehensive 1 at provide land appropriate for a variety of af or a e an ife-cycle housing options; 2. Adopt local housing goals and implementation plans; 3. Use local official controls and resources to facilitate development of a range of housing densities, types and costs; and 4. Approve and permit proposed housing developments in light of population forecasts, existing housing stock, and current and future community and regional needs, as appropriate. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2011-2020. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7-county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element of the implementation program is a housing implementation program, "...including official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and modera�e income housing." Orono's share is forecasted at 311 new affordable housing units for the decade 2011-2020. To accomodate Orono's share of new affordable housin� units the Land Use Plan has desi�nated 102 net acres for development at 6 units per acre or higher All of this land is desi�nated for development immediatel� This Housing Plan is an indication of the ongoing policies and concerns of Orono residents toward solving our own housing problems while taking considered and appropriate measures to address regional growth concerns. This Plan is a refinement and restatement of the planning direction established in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and the 1980 and 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plans, and is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. The Housing Plan is intended to provide a review of Orono's existing housing stock. As an older outlying municipality on the developing fringe of the Metro area, especially one with miles of desirable lakeshore, it is easy to forget or to overlook the true housing situation in Orono. The Housing Plan includes a brief review of eXisting housing statistics which illustrates the variety and diversity of existing housing in Orono. 2. The Housing Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials, City staff and other parties interested in improving the condition of Orono's available housing supply. The Plan includes City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3C-3 • -^ ' .. ' f.--^ r�......... ' ..,.. � /�C:T� S-�C;ii.. /ld(� �� l � CMP Part 3C. Housin Plan / Population trends during � ysis of development capabilities of remaining land as compared to Orono's current zoning and land use plan, suggests a year 2030 population of around 9,000. This figure is very close to Orono's current (2008) estimated population of 7,800. This downward trend over the last 3 decades is clearly a result of Orono's 1975 city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reacting to environmental concerns regarding protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. The projected population numbers for 2010 through 2030 shown in Table 3C-1 reflect the gradually decreasing size of the typical household, reduced from 3.16 persons per household (PPH) in 1970 to 2.73 PPH at the 2000 census. Household sizes are projected to shrink even further to a level of 2.4&39 PPH by �8�9-2030. Orono's 2030 population projection of 9,89�-800 reflects an estimated�&4100 households at�-�8?.39 persons per household. The projected population is in line with and a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies. The population projections are consistent with Orono's rural land use preservation policies. The population projections reflect a careful parcel-by-parcel analysis of existing and planned development according to the Land Use Plan presented in this 2030 CMP update. In Orono, the Land Use Plan is the determinant factor in future growth, rather than allowing growth to drive the Land Use Plan. This is the cornerstone of Orono's long-term development hilosophy and policies. NEW TABLE 3G1: Table 3C-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2030 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- 5,800 7,000 7,300 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 8,300 9,500 9,800 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- 2,256 2,950 3,020 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 944 I,000 1,080 � Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 3,200 3,950 4,100 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.7� 2.59 2.41 2.39 urce: Metropolitan Council System Statement City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3C-8 1 CMP Part 3C. Housina Plan OLD TABLE 3G1 TO BE REPLACED: Table -l: Orono Population Projections (March 2008) �� Population Forecasts Year `� 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 � Urban Area (1/2 & 1 a . 4,160 3,995 4,135 4,063 �4,600 5,050 5,160 Rural Area (2& 5 ac.) 627 2,850 3,150 ��75 3,550 3,600 3,840 Total City 6,78 6,845 7,2$�5� 7,538 8,150 8,650 9,000 Occtipied Household Forecasts* Year 1970 ��980 990 2000 ZO10 2020 2030 Urban Area(1/2 & 1 ac.) 1,316 1,337 1,4 � 1,491 1,775 2,100 2,150 ,-- Rural Area(2 & 5 ac.) � �'� 830 954 1,130 75 1,375 1,500 1,600 Total City �,'� 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,76 3,1�0 3,600 3,7�0 Persons/HI�"�� 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2. 2.40 2.40 � �$ources: 1970-2000 U.S. Census data and City records; 2010-2030 litan Council forecasts; City records and forecasts. *Does not include vacant dwellin�units Orono's land use plan accommodates all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. The forecast population increase of approximately �98�2000 persons in the next twenty years translates into a housing demand of approximately �-800 new dwelling units. This average of ?�-3840 new dwellings per year is consistent with or slightly below Orono's rate of actual new residence building permit issuance during the past two decades. Based on the Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. The Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework adopted in January 2004 and the Minnesota Livable Communities Act emphasizes the need for a wide range of housing alternatives and locations such as that afforded by Orono's differing urban and rural neighborhoods. The location of housing alternatives is directly related to the opportunities and services enjoyed by residents of the Metropolitan Area. Location influences not only access to employment, but also the availability of neighborhood parks and recreational programs, libraries, health care facilities, day care centers, and access to major retail centers, highways, and public transit. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3C-9 . � CMP Part 3C. Housin�Plan Successful development of a wide range of housing alternatives is directly related to the ability to obtain the necessary infrastructure and public services. In today's market, affordable housing and many fornzs of lifecycle housing are only feasible at urban densities, which require urban infrastructure such as municipal sewer and water, and the wide range of urban services not available in the 80% of Orono that is planned for low-density rural residential development. New housing alternatives in Orono are planned primarily to occur within the exis�ing urban area as well as in specified urban area expansions that are detailed in the Land Use Plan. These housing options will include a range � of housing styles and types at densities of 2 to �15 units per acre. Where feasible, affordable housing units will be incorporated within multi-unit new housing development, in areas desi�nated for Mixed Use Medium-High Densit� Residential. and Hi�h Density Residential in the Land Use Plan .- Development Densitv and Housin� Goals Minnesota Statutes 473.859 Subd. 2(c) states that the content of the land use plan element of comprehensive pla�7s shall "include a housing element containirrg standards, plans and programs fo�° providirrg adequate housir�g opportur�ities to meet existing and projected local and regional housing rreeds, including but r�ot limited to the use of o�cial controls and la�rd use planning to promote the availabiliry of larrd for the development of low and nzoderate incori�e housing. " 2000-20I0 Housing Goals. In the 2000-2020 CMP the City of Orono did not strictly commit to providing a specific number of affordable housing units. Rather, as is shown in Table 3C-9, the City established a 2000-2010 goal of providing 160 `affordable' townhomes, with `affordable ownership' defined as owne�•-occupied townhome units developed at a density of at least 6 units per acYe; and a goal of 120 `affordable' rental units with `affordable rental' defined as attached multi family rental units developed at a density of�at least 10 units per ac��e. In its acceptance of Orono's 2000-2020 CMP, the Metropolitan Council recognized that the variety of economic factors inherent to Orono would make it impossible to develop housing that would meet the price-point definition of `affordable', and accepted the premise that provision of higher-density opportunities was a realistic method to allow for a variety of price-points. Orono has made significant progress toward meeting these goals. As described in greater detail later in this Chapter, the Highway 12 area "Stonebay" townhome development in and of itself, at an overall density of 6.23 units per acre (157 units on 25.2 net acres) will essentially meet Orono's 2000-2010 goal for number of owner-occupied townhomes. For rental units, the Orono Woods Senior Housing project completed in 2003 containing 62 uiuts at a density of 15.35 units per acre, accomplished half of the City's 120-unit multi-family rental goal. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3G10 CMP Part 3C. Housina Plan 2011-2020 Housing Goals. Far the period 2011-2020, Met Council in collaboration with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) established a 4-step methodology for determining affordable housing needs for the region: 1) determine forecasted household growth in sewered areas; 2) determine the proportion of growth expected to be made up of sewered households; 3) estimate the number of new affordable housing units that the private market will provide to new low-income households; and 4) calculate the net need for newly- constructed affordable housing units. A two-step approach was then used to allocate the need among the region's � sewered municipalities: Step 1 - Apportion new low-income housing need in each community according to its growth based on 2010 household forecasts, assuming the metro-wide average of 30.6% of all new housing units would be affordable to low-income renters or buyers; Step 2 - make adjustments far each community based on a) low-wage job proximity; b) affardable housing stock; and c) transit service. Orono's share based on this formula is 3ll X affardable units needed during the period 2011-2020. As stated, previouslv, the City's land use plan accommodates for these units in areas guided for development at 6 units per acre or hi her. _.... ":??@ " �6�6�6�-�6@S-rrA�c��O--ucE6iirr+i--Ear2ii�`�'�-r+i--rn��^E�rcc�Ei a��e��trx�s-e��ee-pe��E�o°�a e�b�B-�4�e�Tz�—�� , �: » �€€e��}e--ke�s�s �a�� *�� „r^^„��a �nn4 �mn r��rv r a rr ni 9�e�e-�r�-��--a��e�-4��e=��e�e�-k�„�• ��o �sea�� t�-�e�i��zeerr'�-998-a��-9-��4a�r;�� o--e�o�e-b98- ��--�e+ � •+ �Fe��ie=�urea--6�--�v�-�*c�C`�s, wvc i�ee�-te-�Ch2 „+.,L.lo �.,�1, City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3G11 • CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan The Lake Minnetonka area is comprised of a number of individual cities, both large and small, each of which have the capacity to provide housin� for certain 'niches' of the population, but few of which have the capacity to provide for all categories of lifecycle or affordable housing. In order to identify the existing life-cycle and diversified housing, and to identify opportunities for such housing from a sub-regional perspective, the 16 Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities (LMACC) in 1998 prepared a Sub-Regional Housing Study. The LMACC Study identified a number of key issues which set the stage for addressing problems and identifying opportunities for development of adequate housing in the subregion. The key issues relate to two primary factors: the changing profile of the LMACC cities, including demographics, life-cycle housing, population turnover, and low/moderate income households; and the housing stock, including market trends, housing conditions, housing values, and housing options. The Study proposed a series of six Housing Initiatives, including: 1) A Subregional Approach to addressing housing needs; 2) Actions to create Sustainable Communities; 3) Development of Diversified Housing Options; 4) Establishment of Support Services such as transit access, child care assistance, etc. 5) Establishment of a Subregional Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA); and 6) Protection of Existing Housing. Housing Needs Related to Reroutin� of fli�hway 12 The rerouting of Highway 12 resulted in the acquisition and removal by MnDOT of a number of dwelling units within the cities of Long Lake and Orono. The City of Long Lake was substantially impacted by the rerouting as approximately 10% of its tax base was lost. Further, as a fully developed municipaliry Long Lake does not have sufficient land area to accommodate relocation of these homes, many of which were in the $100,000-200,000 price range. To potentially assist in replacing these lost dwelling units, Orono's 2000-2020 CMP expanded the MUSA in the area east of Willow Drive between the Burlington Northern Railroad and Watertown Road, and re-guided this area from 2-acre Rural SFR to Urban SFR at a density of 2-3 units per acre, similar to the adjoining development in Orono's Hackberry Hill neighborhood and to abutting residential development in Long Lake. The goal of this expansion was to make City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3G19 ♦ CMP Part 3C. Housin�Plan land available at a density that might support moderately-priced housing at or below the $350,000 -500,000 range. It was hoped that such housing could accommodate the relocation of some of the Long Lake households displaced by the Highway 12 rerouting. The first development within this expanded MUSA area created 8 new SFR building sites at a net density of 2.0 units per acre. Initial residential construction within this development is priced at levels higher than anticipated. The Ciry of Orono will investigate and promote methods by which more moderate priced housing can be provided as this area further develops. The northerly portion of this area (Parcel Group 3 in Land Use Plan) is currently bein� reQuided to allow for multi-familv residential development at a density of up to 15 units per acre. Metropolitan Livable Communities Pro�ram In 1995 the Minnesota legislature enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, which established funding for metro-area cities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housinb initiatives. The Metropolitan Council is responsible for implementing the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program, and negotiating with individual municipalities to establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide Orono has participated in the Livable Communities program since 1996. The program establishes benchmarks for housing affordability, life-cycle housing, and housing density. In response to the Met Council benchmarks, the City Council in June 1996 adopted a Housing Action Plan identifying rehabilitation of existing substandard housing as the City's top priority, citing limited commercial-industrial development and employment opportunities, as well as limited availability of public services, and the skyrocketing price of land as barriers to providing opportunities for affordable housing in Orono. While Orono did not commit to any specified numeric goals within the context of the Livable Communities Act, the City is required to identify numerical goals in response to the Land Planning Act. The City's housing goals in terms of affordability, life-cycle housing and density for new sewered development in the period 2000-2010 appear in Table 3C-9. To address the need for additional lifecycle housing options, Orono in its 2000- 2020 CMP guided new areas within the northern portion of the City near the Highway 12 corridor for medium density residential use. These revisions provided for a mix of single-family and multi-family development at densities ranging from 2-6 units per acre (see Map 3B-7). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3G20 ! CMP Part 3C. Housina Plan HOZISING GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Housing Action Plan is based upon the following Goals and Policies which are designed to be consistent with our regional housing responsibilities and with the Goals, Policies and Plans of the other elements of the Community Management Plan. Housin� Goals 1. To improve the housing conditions of persons residing in substandard housing. 2. To provide safe, bealthful, and blight-free residences and neighborhoods. 3. To provide opportunities for a mix of housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. 4. To provide housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. 5. To provide immediately beneficial housing programs for the greatest number of Orono residents with affordable housing needs. Urban Housina Policies 1. The residential areas of urban Orono are primarily suitable for single family development. Because of historic development patterns, most of Orono's urbanized neighborhoods are located along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline, or within 1,000 feet of the shoreline. These lands are environmentally sensitive to overuse or over development such as typically occurs with large scale developments. Urban residential development in a limited number of areas further from the shoreline at a � density of 2-6-15 units per acre is compatible with Orono's environmental policies of limited hardcover and maximum retention of natural open space and vegetation to protect Lake Minnetonka. 2. A wider range of housing types will be provided by planned residential developments. A limited amount of land is available within the Urban Service Area for planned developments of attached City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3G2� h I f CMP Part 4A - Transportation Plan 3-23-10 Revisions Summary: P. 4A-5: Population and Households Forecasts revised to match Met Council Systems Statement farecasts (text and Table 4A-1) P. 4A-9 Traffic forecasts updated to 2030 data recently available from Hennepin County (text and Map 4A-1) P. 4A-14 Population and Households Forecasts by Traffic Analysis Zones revised to match Met Council Systems Statement Pop. and HH forecasts (Table 4A-2) _ ^ . ' CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan `, � powers of science and industry to solve all problems. Population graphs showed growth projections running off the paper. Suburbs boomed while core cities were fighting for their very survival. The 1970's brought a new environmental awareness and an understanding that nature, not science, was the key to our planet's survivaL New social concerns revived the cities and showed how characterless the suburbs had become.Inflation and population stabilization brought unlimited expansion to a halt as roads, schools, and all public services began scrambling for maintenance dollars while overbuilt facilities quickly became terrible taxpayer burdens. The cost of energy dramatically refocused everyone's attention on conservation and careful planning of any new facility. The results of these changes on the Twin Cities region and on Orono were significant. Orono's ultimate population projections have been dropping from estimates of 37,000 made in 1970, to 23,000 in 1972, to 14,000 in 1974, to the Metropolitan Council's projection of 11,000 made in 1979. Population trends during the last 30 years and a careful oing analysis of development capabilities of remaining land as com ared to Oron 's current and intended zoning, suggest an ultimate population of aro nd 9,000. Th' downward trend over the last four decades is clearly a result of Or o's 1975 city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reacting to envir tal concerns regarding protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Table 4A-1: Orono Population Projections (March 2008) _...__ _�..._. Population Forecasts � Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 OIO 2020 2030 Urban Area (1/2 & 1 ac.) 4,160 3.995 4,1�5 4,063 4,600 5.050 �.160 Rural Area (2 & 5 ac.) 2,627 2,850 3,150 3,475 3,550 3,600 3,840 Total City 6,787 6,84� 7,285 7,538� 8,150 8,650 9,000 _ Occupied Household For ast * � Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 010 2020 2030 Urban Area (1/2 & 1 ac.) 1,316 1,337 1,483 1,49 1,775 2,100 2,150 Rural Area(2 & 5 ac.) 830 954 1,li0 1,2 � 1,375 1,500 1.600 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,7 3,150 3,600 3,750 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.�9 2.40 2.40 Sources: 1970-2000 U.S. Census data and City records; 2010-2030 M opolitan Council forecasts; City records and forecasts. *Does not include vacant dwelling units The projected population as shown in Table 4A-1 is in line with and a direct result of Orono's rural land use preservation policies,and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council's Environmental Services section. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4A-5 CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan � (� powers of science and industry to solve all problems. Population graphs showed growth projections running off the paper. Suburbs boomed while core cities were fighting for their very survival. The 1970's brought a new environmental awareness and an understanding that nature, not science, was the key to our planet's survival. New social concerns revived the cities and showed how characterless the suburbs had become.Inflation and population stabilization brought unlimited expansion to a halt as roads, schools, and all public services began scrambling for maintenance dollars while overbuilt facilities quickly became terrible taxpayer burdens. The cost of energy dramatically refocused everyone's attention on conservation and careful planning of any new facility. The results of these changes on the Twin Cities region and on Orono were significant. Orono's ultimate population projections have been dropping from estimates of 37,000 made in 1970, to 23,000 in 1972, to 14,000 in 1974, to the Metropolitan Council's projection of 11,000 made in 1979. Population trends during the last 30 years and a careful and._ongoing analysis of development capabilities of remaining land as comp�'ed�to Oro o's current and intended zoning, suggest an ultimate population of aro nd 9,800. is downward trend over the last four decades is clearly a result of Oro ' 75 city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reacting to environmental concerns regarding protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. ; Table 4A-l: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2030 � (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) _,�._ �, Population --�""�. - , Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- 5,800 7,000 7,300 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total Cih� 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,53 , 8,300 9,500 9,800 Households ___..._____�_ Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 20 � 2030 � Sewered -- -- -- -- 2,256 2,950 3,020 Unsewered -- -- -- - 944 1,000 1,080 Tj otal City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2, 66 , 3,200 3,950 4,100 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.7 2.59 2.41 2.39 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement The projected population as shown in Table 4A-1 is in line with and a direct result of Orono's rural land use preservation policies,and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council's Environmental Services sec�ion. Cit�- of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4A-5 CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan � S UMMAR Y OF EXISTING TRANSPOR TA TION ISS UES Orono's existing transportation issues generally fall into 3 categories: congestion, safety and system maintenance. Congestion is caused by daily and hourly traffic volumes that exceed the traffic handling capacity of the road system. The capacity for a given roadway is a function of many factors including the number of lanes,the number and type of access points and intersections, the configuration of the roadway and the condition of the pavement. Traffic volumes that exceed the traffic handling capacity can result in traffic backups that ultimately have a secondary impact on parallel corridors. The two primary routes in Orono that have historically been congested are County Road 15 and U.S. Highway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard). County Road 15 currently exceeds its traffic volume design capacity based on generally recognized standards. A two-lane arterial facility such as County Road 15 is usually considered as being , congested when the daily volumes reach 13,000-18,000. County Road 15 has a 2006/2007 ADT of 18,200 vehicles through the Navarre area and 23,900 vehicles just ' east of the Orono/Wayzata border, and these counts are forecasted to increase to 21,000 and 27,000 vehicles per day respectively by 2020. Old Highway 12 had a 2006 ADT ranging from 17,700 in western Orono to as high as 24,700 (2005 Data) east of downtown Long Lake. Future traffic counts for the new Highway 12 bypass and Wayzata Boulevard now that the bypass has been opened are eXpected later in 2009. Orono has a number of unique Qeographical factors that limit the options for reducing congestion, the most apparent being Lake Minnetonka and its many bays and associated wetlands. It is also significant that the volumes of traffic causing congestion are generated by commuters from developing communities to the west of Orono. Safety is an issue of concern where the impacts of congested commuter roadways spill over into parallel corridors, as well as where major collectars intersect the principal and `A' minor arterials. As traffic counts have risen and congestion has increased, access onto County Road 1� has become more difficult and drivers are willing to take more risks in entering the traffic stream. The addition of a third lane for turns along County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road has improved this segment of 15,but the roadway west of Orono Orchard Road is difficult to upgrade due to constrictions in the right-of-way caused by geographic characteristics. County improvements to the Orono Orchard Road / CR-1� intersection are scheduled for 2009. Prior to completion of the Highway 12 bypass,its route throu�h Orono and Long Lake was the primary commuter route for a string of rural communities as far west as Willmar, and had built-in safety concerns due to the volume of traffic and the many crossroads. While the level of traffic on Wayzata Boulevard has significantly decreased. additional future development near the Wayzata Boule�°ard / Old Crystal City of Orono Communit�� Manabement Plan 2008-2030 Pa�e 4A-9 CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan � � � SUMMARY OF EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Orono's existing transportation issues generally fall into 3 categories: congestion, safety and system maintenance. Congestion is caused by daily and hourly traffic volumes that exceed the traffic handling capacity of the road system.The capacity for a given roadway is a function of many factors including the number of lanes,the number and type of access points and intersections, the configuration of the roadway and the condition of the pavement. Traffic volumes that exceed the traffic handling capacity can result in traffic backups that ultimately have a secondary impact on parallel corridors. The two primary routes in Orono that have historically been congested are County Road 15 and U.S. Highway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard). County Road 15 currently exceeds its traffic volume design capacity based on generally recognized standards. A two-lane arterial facility such as County Road 15 is usually considered as being congested when the daily volumes reach 13,000-18,000. County Road 15 has a 2007/2008 ADT of 18,200 vehicles through the Navarre area and 23,900 vehicles just east of the Orono/Wayzata border; these counts are forecasted to decrease slightly to 18,100 and 21,400 vehicles per day respectively by 2030. Old Highway 12 had a 2006 ADT ranging from 17,700 in western Orono to as high as 24,700 (2005 Data)east of downtown Long Lake. Hennepin County forecasts indicate that by 2030, traffic counts on Wayzata Boulevard through Long Lake will be at an ADT of 16,600 with an ADT of 27,100 on the new Highway 12 Bypass. Orono has a number of unique geographical factors that limit the options for reducing congestion, the most apparent being Lake Minnetonka and its many bays and wetlands. It is also significant that the volumes of traffic causing congestion are generated by commuters from developing communities to the west of Orono. Safety is an issue of concern where the impacts of congested commuter roadways spill over into parallel corridors, as well as where major collectors intersect the principal and `A' minor arterials. As traffic counts have risen and congestion has increased, access onto County Road 15 has become more difficult and drivers are willing to take more risks in entering the traffic stream. The addition of a third lane for turns along County Road 15 east of Orono Orchard Road has improved this segment of 15,but the roadway west of Orono Orchard Road is difficult to upgrade due to constrictions in the right-of-way caused by geographic characteristics. County improvements to the Orono Orchard Road / CR-15 intersection were completed in 2009. Prior to completion of the Highway 12 bypass,its route through Orono and Long Lake was the primary commuter route for a string of rural communities as far west as Willmar, and had built-in safety concerns due to the volume of traffic and the many crossroads. While the level of traffic on Wayzata Boulevard has si�nificantly decreased, additional future development near the Wayzata Boulevard /Old Cr��stal City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Pa�e 4A-9 CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan 1.�, TRAFFIC VOL UME FORECASTS Existing and projected traffic volumes for the arterials and collectors in Orono are shown on Map 4A-1. In order to better analyze current and future travel patterns, cities are divided into geographic Traffic Analysis Zones(TAZ's). Map 4A-2 depicts the eight TAZ's which are entirely or partially located within Orono. The projected population,households and employment within each TAZ are shown in Table 4A-2. Table 4A-2: Population/Household/Employment Projections 1990-2030 b Tr one (Taz TAZ Po lation Ho olds s 1990 200 2010 2020 2030 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 627 327 l4 360 340 3�0 134 13 140 ]40 l45 630 860 09 860 835 850 3l2 3 6 325 34� 355 631 738 40 885 86� 89� 306 15 335 355 365 643 587 70 635 635 655 224 OS 240 260 265 644 2355 2 7] 2480 2470 2580 842 78 940 1020 ]065 645 938 l 19 1065 115� 1165 31� 55 435 465 475 646 1343 15 4 1480 1470 1595 43� 15 �60 600 655 647 Li7 l 1 385 880 910 4� � 175 415 42� Totals 7285 753 81�0 8650 9000 2613 276 31�0 3600 3750 Perso s Per Household 2.79 2.73 2.59 2.40 2.40 TAZ Total Employment* Retail Employment* 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 627 4� 90 l00 100 100 1� 0 65 6� 65 630 105 l36 140 140 140 45 50 65 70 70 631 11� 122 l45 145 145 4� 0 110 ] 10 ] l0 643 3� ]00 65 65 65 � l00 10 ]0 10 644 45 77 40 3� 35 20 34 20 20 20 645 5� 58 250 270 270 25 50 80 90 l00 646 4� 45 �5 » 55 0 0 � � 5 647 57� 482 �40 705 785 10 20 20 30 40 Totals 1020 1110 1335 1515 1595 140 2�4 375 400 420 *Employment projections reflect that all known employment is sewered, and do not account for self-employed home workers or domestic help. 1990 and 2000 Employment data source: Metropolitan Council City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4A-14 ...w.__--�-- - �,.,:.� •'_<, CMP Part 4A. Trans ortation Plan � TRAFFIC VOL UME FORECASTS Existing and projected traffic volumes for the arterials and collectors in Orono are shown on Map 4A-1. In order to better analyze current and future travel patterns, cities are divided into geographic Traffic Analysis Zones(TAZ's). Map 4A-2 depicts the eight TAZ's which are entirely or partially located within Orono. The projected population,households and employment within each TAZ are shown in Table 4A-2. Table 4A-2: Population/Household/E lo ment Projections 1990-2030 Update - 0 bv Tr c Analysis ne (Taz) TAZ Pop tion Ho olds 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 627 327 31 380 340 350 134 137 145 140 145 630 860 80 8�5 880 920 312 31 330 365 385 631 738 7 0 880 900 945 306 31 340 375 395 643 587 5 0 635 720 765 224 2 5 245 300 320 644 2355 23 1 2460 2480 2630 842 8 9�0 1030 1100 645 938 10� 9 1140 1130 1145 315 55 440 470 480 646 1343 IS'4 1485 2040 2030 435 15 570 850 850 647 137 1 ��1 465 1010 1015 45 5 180 420 425 Totals 7285 753 8300 9�00 9800 2613 276 3200 3950 4100 Persons er Househol 2.79 2.73 2.59 2.41 2.39 TAZ Total Employment* Retail Employment'� 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 627 45 90 100 100 100 15 0 65 65 65 630 105 136 140 140 140 45 50 65 70 70 631 ll 5 122 145 145 145 45 0 110 110 ll 0 643 35 100 65 65 65 5 100 10 10 10 644 45 77 40 35 35 20 34 20 20 20 645 55 58 250 270 270 25 50 80 90 100 646 45 45 55 55 �5 0 0 5 5 5 647 575 482 540 705 785 10 20 20 30 40 Totals 1020 1110 1335 1515 1595 140 254 375 400 420 *Employment projections reflect that all known employment is sewered, and do not account for self-employed home workers or domestic help. 1990 and 2000 Emplo,yment data source: Metropolitan Council City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4A-14 , .... . 3p ... .... .. .. . ..... ...�,.. �.. . .. . . 50W �� . ._ ---.. _. ,�os`" � oa � 7550 ;� e'so = . -9700 Existing and Projected 6' � � 7 Traffic Volumes � � d �, �,,_ 9j� j8�50 . g 570 �� . �- � o . . : . . . �� -- ,66� g City of Orono � moo zssao r------ _� :"•° e Minnesota � :. . ��p � a. , . . 27f00 \�� . . . o ' � �� .�� -._ .. . . � -� � ��s$ .. . . ' . ,.., , � . . N - _ So 01 �✓ � : � „ , _ .� �_ znoa : o �n� zsoo: ��_ i ( � ��., ' �s000 Existing Traffic Volumes . 570 � ' '�^ �..2450 ... "�.. . . ... .., ...... - \�._,.. . NI g� , , • (MnDOT 2007 and 2008 AADT �o> �_ Volumes) $ � o p '� l Z�aoo to5oo 2030 Projected Tra�c Volumes � a � � � 23gp0 (Hennepin County 2030 AADT . ' 2aoo : 170° Forecast) � �;: T,. � . ..�. '�, 1575 . 980 ., ... .1400 , 1800 rytia� City Limits . _. . .. .. . u+ � , � . i m o � . � . . � $ . ,,. . , M . . � . �� N . �. . , � o . �� , . , . .. . O . - '.;tb9 . . (. "-. • N . - . . ... ��SQ� � . .. _. ^ �..23�q0 . j ., ' . . .. . 193� ��. N � " � � � . .. 3� ' _5700 ��: � . .�. 3as0 - sio0 � �' ' F i.._.,, . 520� � o � .. � � ��5500 " ^� . � \ j S 1 i_� � � �.pO ......... , t 0 3000 6000 � �, ; �.;�,, � � k-_ ___.�_� ' � � � Scale in feet � s�oqo ` � �i , ',�`;. � - �__^ �aioo ,b'�'i , . I � �- ia2oo � � � � �- ' �:, � 04��0 �� . , . � �� , �� . , i� --� � ;� ,, x. �� Bonestroo � _ ; ( + F' ' � � . 1 f . / I� '� , tt . _(, ., .Y . �� ';��:A�-�i: i \.%� �.. ''•. � ~Ritl�rG�. e I ` ` � ..__ .. t ` /� y� ~ �. �'.� �...... ��.... �.� � �� ' -�� MAP 4A-1 �______--___..._.__� �,=„=o . r CMP Part 4C - Sewers 3-23-10 Revisions Summary: P. 4G9: Population and Households Forecasts revised to match Met Council Systems Statement forecasts (text and Table 4C-1) P. 4C-14: Sewered Households, Population and Employment tables revised to exclude unsewered figures and reflect Met Council forecasts. P. 4G 19: Added text regarding MUSA Part XXXXX - Eisinger property. P. 4C-41: Revised table 4G5 to reflect updated Sewer Capacity Demand figures based on Met Council forecasts. P. 4C-43 thru 50: Updated all projections for Residential Equivalent Connection numbers in Tables 4C-6 thru 4C-9 based on Met Council forecasts and my estimates of when/where connections will occur in next 20 years. Added text for MUSA Part XXXXX on Page 4C-47. P. 4G51: Updated Table 4G12 based on results of Tables 4C-6 thru 4C-9. P. 4G52 thru 54: On 4G53/54, revised bits of text to match all of the above and Updated Table 4G 13 P. 4C-61: Updated Table 4G15 to reflect a"guesstimate" as to when additional sewer connections might occur each year for 2010 thru 2020. Map 4G2 MUSA: Revised (in process) to reflect addition of Eisinger property Map 4C-2 Supplement: A new map that illustrates the history of when each of our (now up to a total of 50) MUSA areas was added. \ . , CMP Part 4C. Com rehensive Sewer Policv Pla I The 1950's and 1960's were year great expansion and r ' e upon the powers of science and industry to solve a p . opu ation graphs showed growth projections running off the paper. Suburbs boomed while core cities were fighting for their very survival. The 1970's brought a new environmental awareness and an understanding that nature, not science was the key to our planet's survival. New social concerns revived the cities and showed how characterless the suburbs had become. Inflation and population stabilization brought unlimited expansion to a halt as roads, schools, and all public services began scrambling for maintenance dollars while overbuilt facilities quickly became terrible taxpayer burdens. The cost of energy dramatically refocused everyone's attention on conservation and careful planning of any new facility. � The result of these changes on the Twin Cities region and on Orono was significant. Orono's ultimate population projections have been dropping from estimates of 37,000 made in 1970, to 23,000 in 1972, to 14,000 in 1974, to 11,000 in 1979. Population trends during the last 30 years and a careful analysis of development capabilities of remaining land as compared to Orono's current zoning with a small number of proposed changes, suggests an ultimate population of around 9,800. This figure is not far from Orono's current (2008) estimated population of 7,800. This downward trend over the last four decades is clearly a result of Orono's 1975 city-wide rezoning to lower residential densities, reacting to environmental concerns regarding protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Table 4C-l: Orono Population and Households 1970-2030 Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 20I0 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- 5,800 7,000 7,300 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 2,500 2,J00 2,500 Total City 6,787 6,84� 7,285 7,538 8,300 9,�00 9,800 Households Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Sewered -- -- -- -- �,2�6 2,950 3,020 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 944 1,000 1.080 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 3,200 3,950 4,100 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.59 2.40 2.40 Sources: 1970-2000 U.S. Census data;2010-2030 Metropolitan Council System Statement City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Pa�e 4C-9 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan The following tables provide an estimate of sewered households, population and employment based on Orono's 2008-2030 CMP. , � i Table 4C-2a: Estimates of Sewered Aouseholds by Interceptor Service Area 2010-2030 i � 2000 2010 2020 '� 2030 I' � I Interceptor Service Area � � LS-59 (Orono) --- 1525 1625 1650 LS-60(Long Lake) --- 380 850 870 Downstream Interceptors --- 265 350 �375 Wayzata Direct --- 86 125 12� Plymouth Direct --- �� 0 0 Sewered Households' 1844 2256 2950 3020 'Source of 2010-2030 data: Orono Systems Statement Table 4G2b: Projected Sewered Employees 2010-2030 � Interceptor Service Area 2000 2010 i 2020 � 2030 Lift Station 59(Orono) 285 300 330 360 Lift Station 60(Long Lake) 900 1000 ]150 1200 Downstream Interceptors 20 20 20 20 Wayzata Direct* ]0 ]0 10 10 Plymouth Direct 5 5 5 � Total 1220 133_5 1515 1595 Met Counci12005 Forecast ----- 1230 1420 1500 Source: City Forecasts;Met Council 200�Forecasts; * Does not include emplo}�ees of Woodhill CC(located in Wayzata but discharging to Orono sewer s��stem):and does not include employees of Wayzata CC(located in Orono but discharging directly to Wavzata sewer system). Table 4C-2c: Estimates of Sewered Population by Interceptor Service Area 2010-2030 � Interceptor Service Area � 2000 2010 2020 2030 � LS-59 (Orono) �-� 3940 3900 397� LS-60 (Lon� Lake) --- 980 2000 2125 Downstream Interce tors --- 680 800 900 Wavzata Direct --- 200 300 300 Plymouth Direct --- 0 0 0 Persons/Household(per MC) 2J25 2.59 2.41 2.39 � Sewered Population' S,025 5,800 7,000 � 7,300 'Source of 2010-2030 data: Orono Systems Statement City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G14 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan 5. This 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan will immediately expand the current 2008 MUSA by adding the following institutionally-used residential property: MUSA PART XXXXIX - 8�0 West Wayzata Boulevard (This 6.2- acre property contains a former church building currently used as a Montessori school. The property is zoned and guide-planned for Single-Family Residential use at a density of one unit per 2 dry buildable acres. At the request of the property owner, the property is being re-guided for Institutional Use as part of this 2008-2030 CMP, which will require a CMP amendment before it could be developed for residential use; the current school/daycare use is an allowed conditional use in the RR-1B zone via a Conditional Use Permit, and will continue to operate under the terms of that CUP. The building has a nonconforming septic system. The site is surrounded on three sides by property in the MUSA and on the fourth side by MnDNR's Luce Line Trail and Wood Rill SNA.) 6. This 2008-2030 Comprehensive Plan will immediately expand the current 2008 MUSA by adding the following residential property for future high- density development: MUSA PART XXXXX - 3245 West Wayzata Boulevard (This 29-acre property is comprised of two tax parcels containing a single-family residence and a closed sanitary landfilL The property contains approximately 5 developable acres, with an additional 11 acres encumbered with the former landfill, plus 13 acres of wetland. The site is situated between new Highway 12 and Wayzata Boulevard, just east of the confluence of those two main transportation routes. The property is being re-guided in this CMP to allow far medium-hiba density multi-family residential development.) 7. While the City has no s�aged development plan, and currently has n scheduled projects outside the existing MUSA, any future MUSA expansions will be considered within the context of the following guidelines: a. The RR-lA 5-acre zoning district, plus the additional areas of northwest Orono encompassing Three Rivers Park District's Baker Regional Park, will not be incorporated within the MUSA during the planning period 2008-2030. b. Areas within the 2-acre single-family LR-1 A Lakeshore Residential and RR-1B Rural Residential zoning districts which are not included within the 2000-2020 MUSA as amended (Parts I thru XXXXV) nor within the proposed expansion areas (Parts City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-19 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan The Orono-Long Lake Interceptor is designed and constructed with sufficient capacity to permit planned development within the urbanized areas of Orono, Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach, and the Morningside area of Medina. The Interceptor was also designed with sufficient capacity to accommodate additional flows from Orono including a number of rural neighborhood clusters where pre- existing residential development required municipal sewer, and to accommodate additional planned urban development in northern Orono primarily along the Highway 12 corridor. However, capacity is not unlimited and is not sufficient to accommodate sewering of all of rural Orono at urban densities. This capacity is consistent with the land use plans of the other chapters of Orono's Community Management Plan. Table 4C-5: Orono's Share of Orono-Long Lake Interceptor Sewer Design Capacity (1980)Versus Year 2030 Projected Demand 1980 Pipe and Pump Design Y'ear 2030 Demand Average Daily Flow Average Daily Flow Projected Sewer Units (cfs) (mgd) Sewered Population Res. Non-Res. Total Res. Non-Res. Total Res. Non-Res. Total Orono Pump Station(LS-59) 1.37 O.13 L�0 0.89 0.08 0.97 397� 16�0 273 1923 L. L. Pump Station (LS-60)* 0.03 0.14 0.17 0.02 0.09 0.11 212� 870 348 1218 Orono Downstream 0.09 ---- 0.09 0.06 ---- 0.06 900 375 47 423 Connections Totals 1.49 0.27 1.76 0.97 0.17 1.14 7000 2895 668 3563 MGY Equivalent 416 356 Source: Adapted from 1980 Orono CD4P based on Cih� of Orono Resolution No. 901 dated 4-]7-78; Addendum \o. 3, Preliminary Engineering Report on Orono-Lon�,Lake Interceptor prepared by McCombs ICnutson Associates for MWCC dated'�ovember 1977 *This 1980 dat�does not account for the flows from the J�laple Plxin Interceptor which had not been constructed as of 1980. Flow�rate used for 1980 data= 1 15 gaUcapita/day and 3.2 persons/household=368 gpd/unit Flow rate used for 2030 data=274 gpd/REC Note:This table does not include flows directly to Wayzata and Plymouth 6. Maple Plain Interceptor The seventh and last municipal sewer plant discharging into Lake Minnetonka was the Maple Plain plant. Maple Plain had been designated as a freestanding growth center in the late 1970's and most of the sewage entering the plant was generated in the Crow River watershed. The Metropolitan Council's 208 Water Quality Study concluded that only minor plant alterations would be necessary to upgrade this plant for satisfactory levels of phosphorus removal. As of 1980, the 208 recommendation, and the accepted plans of Maple Plain, Orono, Medina and the MWCC, all agreed that the then 15 year old idea for a Maple Plain interceptor was no longer necessary and was in fact no longer a valid taxpayer expense. This decision had been reinforced by the final routing of the Orono Long Lake Interceptor and bv the then planned lack of Maple Plain capacity in that Interceptor. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-41 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan B. MUNICIPAL FACILITIES The City of Orono owns, operates and maintains municipal sanitary sewer facilities as indicated on Maps 4G4(a thru f). The City of Orono originally constructed and operated a cornplete sewage collection and treatment system to serve the Navarre Area. With the elimination of the Orono Sewage Treatment Plant in 1980, the City remains responsible for a municipal system of sewer trunks and laterals serving all of urban Orono and parts of rural Orono. Because of topography and historic development patterns, the Orono municipal sewer system includes a number of disconnected sections which can be categorized into 4 distinct service areas: 1. "SOUTHWEST ORONO SYSTEM": All lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to MCES Lift Station#59 (LS-59). CONSTRUCTION Eighteen (18) Projects 1964-2007 1963 Project (Main Trunk/Forcemain) 1964 Project (SE Navarre) 1965 Project (Casco Point, Additional Neighborhoods Along Trunk) 1969 Project (Shorehilis) 1970 Project (Saga Hill) 1971 Project (Dunwoody Ave) 1973 Project (Tonkawa Road) 1979 Project (private) 1980 Project (North Shore/Scotch Pine) 1981 Project (Highwood) 1982 Project (Navarre Upgrade incl. Navarro/Northern Ave.) 1983 Project(Carman Street, Highwood) 1984 Project (LS 7 & FM) 1985 MCES Project 85-67 1992 Project(Stubbs Bay) 1998 Project (Little Orchard - Private) 1999 Project (Livingston Extension - Lake Mtka Woods) 2007 Project (Farview) This is the original municipal sewer sys�em and it still serves the majority of urban Orono. These lines were installed to provide pollution abatement and sewer service to the Navarre business area and to the urban residential areas along Lake Minnetonka. The system was originally designed with capacity to discharge flow from the saturation population in the areas currently served including those areas designated for service but not yet developed. The original design included capacity for Minnetonka Beach. Those portions of the trunk sewer which serve an interceptor function are now operated by MCES. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-43 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan Existing and projected sewer connections to LS-59 are shown in Table 4C-6: i Table 4C-6: Review of Orono Sewer Connections Updated 3-16-10 � Metro Lift Station 59 (Orono) MUSA Part/Description Eaisting Projected Additional Connections (REC's) Connections (Residential connections in bold type) 2008 (REC's) By 2010 2010-2020 2020-2030 Orono LS#s Add Total Add Total Add Total Part I: Navarre/Forest Lake/Tonkawa l. Residential 1340 +10 = 1350 +70 = 1420 +20 =1440 2. Non-residential LS 6-9& 11-28 �55 +10 = 165 +10 = 175 +lp = l85 Part XII: North Shore/Scotch Pine GS-1 ij +0 = 15 +0 = IS +0 = l5 Part XVI: Stubbs Bay LS -3,4, 5 130 +0 = 130 +0 = 130 +0 = 130 Part XVII: Orono Sewer Plant Property 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 Part XXXI: Maxwell Bay Area 13 +10 = 23 +10 = 33 +0 = 33 Part XXXXII: French Lake Shoreland LS-2 � +p = 5 +20 = 25 +5 = 30 Residential Connections 1505 +20 = 1525 +100 = 1625 +25 = 1650 Total LS-�9 REC's Non-Res. Connections l55 +10 = 165 +10 = 17� +�0 = 185 TOTAL RECs 1660 1690 1800 1835 Total LS-59 Flow Rate(MGY) 166.0 169.0 180.0 183.5 2. "HIGHWAY 12 AREA SYSTEM": All lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to LS-60. CONSTRUCTION Fifteen Projects 1967 - 2006 1967 Project; 8" VCP graviry 1973 Project(Hackberry Hills) 1983 Project(Orono/MedinalLong Lake Bypass) 1984 Project(Trunk Repair) 1989 Project(SuQarwoods/Highway 12) 1990 Project(East Willow Woods) 1991 Project(Kelley Parkway) 1997 Project(North LL, LL Cou��try Club, Ice Arena) 2000 Project(Willow View- private) 2000 Project(Foa Ridge, East Long Lake) 2003 Project(North Long Lake Extensions, Phillips) 2004 Project(West Farm/Homestead) 2004 Project(Stonebay- private) 2005 Project(Dickey Lake Drive N. Extension) 2006 Project(CR 6, Jamestown Road) Cit�� of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-44 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan This portion of the municipal system was initially constructed in 1967 as an extension of the Long Lake municipal system primarily to provide sewer (and water) service to the Orono High School being built on the campus west of Old Crystal Bay Road. In addition, this system provided service to two other school buildings and to the Orono Industrial Park. The Hackberry Hills area was a compact development of 2� homes constructed in the 1950's on small lots and with poor septic systems. The area was experiencing multiple system failures and health hazards by the early 1970's which resulted in the construction of sewer laterals. Because the surrounding area was rural pastureland, this neighborhood project was designed and constructed solely to serve these homes with no reserve capacity for future development. Also, the system discharged into the Long Lake system at a location that at that time had no capacity for additional Orono service. This discharge was originally intended to be temporary; however, upon completion of the Long Lake bypass described below, there was sufficient Long Lake capacity to accommodate these 25 units on a permanent basis. All flow from the Orono School System originally discharged into the Long Lake municipal system and eventually into the Long Lake Pump Station of the Orono- Long Lake Interceptor. Capacity in that system was limited by restrictions of certain downstream lines in Long Lake. In a cooperative agreement with the cities of Long Lake and Medina, Orono participated in construction of a bypass line in Long Lake in 1983 to alleviate these constrictions. The basic purpose of this bypass was to provide capacity for sewering 83 homes in the housing cluster of Medina-Morningside to eliminate an existing health problem caused by failure of the on-site systems due to small lot sizes, tight soil and high water table. This project bypassed the Long Lake restrictions with a new 10" line allowing sufficient capacity for Medina-Morningside to be connected to the existing Orono sewer line near the Orono High School. In addition, the bypass provided reserve capacity for the Long Lake industrial area and other Long Lake users, rerouted enough flow to allow permanent connection of Orono's Hackberry Hills area without modifications and permitted reallocation of the reserve in the Orono lines to the existing system users. Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1989 planned for the future development of additional commercial and higher density residential areas along the north side of Highway 12. The Highway 12 sewer system was extended beginning in 1989 to serve the coinmercial property as well as the Sugarwoods neighborhood. Additional extensions in 1990 and 1991 served two residential lots in East Willow Woods and the new municipal facilities on Kelley Parkway. In 1997 a forcemain and laterals were provided to the pre-existing North Long Lake and Long Lake Country Club neighborhoods as part of the City's ongoing policy of providing sewer service to higher density neighborhoods within the rural area and within Shoreland areas. The Orono Ice Arena, located on the Orono Schools complex, was also served at this time. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-45 CMP Part 4C. Comnrehensive Sewer Policv Plan � � Table 4C-7: Review of Orono Sewer Connections: 2008-2030 Updated 3-17-10 ' Metro Lift Station 60 (Lon Lake) Eaisting Projected Additional Connections (RF.C's) Conneetions (Residentia]connections in bold type) MUSA Part/Description c��y Ls#5 2008 �uEc�s> 2010 20l 0-2020 2020-2030 Add Tota] Add Total Add Total Part II: Orono Schools/Industrial Park 1. Orono Schools, west side of OCB Rd. 50 +0 = 50 +0 = 50 +0 = 50 2. Orono Industrial Park Morries Auto (40)+(15 future) 54 +10 = 64 +30 = 94 +2� = 115 Harren Golf (4)+(1 future) Ryan (l0)+(45 future) Part]II: Hackberry 26 +0 = 26 +0 = 26 +0 = 26 Part X: Highway 12 Corridor West 1. Sugarwoods/Orono Woods Residential 87 +0 = 87 +0 = 87 +0 = 87 2. Interspace West Office 0 +6 = 6 �4 = 10 +0 = 10 3. "Orono Shopping Ctr."Commercial 6 +0 = 6 +6 = 12 +0 = 12 4. Service 800 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 5. Otten Brothers 5 +0 = 5 +5 = 10 �10 = 20 6. Ciry Offices Complex 12 +l = 13 +2 = 15 +0 = 1� 7. Orono Schools Annex 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 8. Orono Middle School 15 +0 = IS +0 = 15 +0 = 15 9. Willow View Residential 25 +0 = 25 +0 = 25 +0 = 25 10. Stonebay Residential 94 +l8 = 112 +43 = 157 +0 = 157 1 l. Stonebay Commercial 0 +6 = 6 +0 = 26 +0 = 26 l2. Kelley Pkwy Dental � +0 = 5 +0 = 5 +0 = 5 13. Kelley Pkwy 2-st. Med Ofc 0 +]2 = 12 +0 = l 2 +0 = ]2 Part XII1: 650 Brown Road North 1 +0 = 1 +0 = 1 +0 = 1 Part XIX: North Lon Lake LS-31 31 +0 = 31 +0 = 31 +0 = 31 Part XX: Long Lake Country Club LS-30 20 +0 = 20 +0 = 20 +0 = 20 � Part XXI: East Lon Lake 7 +3 = 10 +0 = 10 +0 = 10 Part XXIII: Fox Rid�e 10 +0 = 10 +0 = 10 +0 = 10 Part XXIX: Orono Schools: Ice Arena GS-8 12 +p = �? +0 = 12 +0 = 12 Part XXX: Dillman Property 0 +1 = 1 +0 = 1 +0 = 1 Part XXXII: Dumas Orchard 0 +0 = 0 +260 = 260 +20 = 280 Part XXXIIL Lake Classen NE GS-8 6 +11 = 17 +0 = 17 +0 = 17 Part XXXIV: Hackberry East 1. Residential 2 +8 = 10 -+45 = 55 +0 = 55 2. Fire Station 4 +0 = 4 +0 = 4 +0 = 4 3. Presb. Church 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 Part XXXV: Van Eeckhout Creekside 0 +4 = 4 +6 = 10 +0 = 10 Part XXXIX: Dicke Lake Shoreland 9 +0 = 9 +31 = 40 +0 = 40 Part XXXX: Lon�Lake Shoreland LS-30, 31 12 +3 = l� +33 = 48 +0 = 48 2010 MUSA Additions: Part XXXXVI: 5/15 Brown Rd. S. 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 Part XXXXX: 3245 Wayzata Boulevard 0 +0 = 0 +50 = �0 +0 = 50 Residential Connections 332 +48 = 380 +470 = 850 +20 = 870 Total LS-60 REC's Non-Res. Connections 170 +35 = 205 +(� =27? +31 = 303 TOTAL RECs 502 �85 1122 1173 � Total LS-60 Flow Rate (MGY) �0.2 58.5 112.2 117.3 � 1 REC=274 gpd= 0.1 mgy � k � �Ty of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-46 � r�r�� CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan The Willow View sewer extension in 2000 served a new 25-lot residential development on the west side of Willow Drive. Two city projects to serve existing Orono neighborhoods were also completed in 2000, both discharging directly to the Long Lake system. Additional extensions to serve existing neighborhoods were completed in 2003-2006. The Stonebay sewer extensions in 2004 provided service to a new 157-unit residential development as well as 3 commercial outlots guided for primarily office use. Proposed MUSA Part XXXXVI is intended to incorporate the two existing residences at 5 and 15 Brown Road South into the MUSA. These two homes were connected to the Long Lake sewer system in 2001-2003 using two of the 50 "floating" sewer units allotted to the City in 1996, but inadvertently not included in the amendment that added 25 Brown Road South in 2007 (Part XXXXIV). Proposed MUSA Part XXXXX incorporates additional developable acreage just west of the Dumas Orchard property. This site which contains a single family residence and a closed sanitary landfill, is being reguided in this CMP to allow for multi-family residential development at a density of 6-7 units per acre. Existing and projected sewer connections to LS-60 are listed in Table 4C-7. 3. "DOWNSTREAM INTERCEPTORS": All trunk and lateral lines which directly discharge to the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor (MCES 7113 and 7113A) downstream from L.S. 59 or L.S. 60. These direct discharges are via City-owned and maintained lift stations pumping into the MCES forcemain at a limited number of locations. Construction occurred durinb 1980-1999 and includes the following lateral systems: a. Crystal Bay (1985) / BayRidge-Hartwood (1997) / Foxhill (1998) / Webber Hills (2000) Lateral System (Discharge to MCES 71li): MUSA Parts VIII, XVIII, XXIV, XXVII, and XXVIII. Future extensions of this lateral system will include MUSA Part XXXVIII and portions of Part XXXXII. b. Bracketts Poin� Lateral System (1997) (Discharges to MCES 7113) MUSA Part XXVI. Future lateral extensions will serve the southerly shore of Tanager Lake (MUSA Part XXXVII). c. Shoreline Drive Marinas Lateral System (1980) (Discharges to MCES 7113) MUSA Part VII. No eXtensions of this lateral are expected. d. Minnetonka Bluffs - Orono Lane - West Ferndale (1980) /Edgewood Hills (1999) Lateral System (Discharges to MCES 7113)(MUSA Parts VI and XXV) (Includes Woodhill Country Club flows from property in City of Wayzata). MUSA Part XXXVI allowed for additional individual property connections to this lateral system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-47 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan e. Orono Orchards Lateral System (1999) (Discharges to MCES 7113A) (MUSA Part XXII) Each of these neighborhood lateral systems resulted from Alternative Waste Management Studies conducted by the City. In each case, the Studies determined that municipal sewer was the most appropriate long-term method of sewage treatment for the area. Each of these areas exhibited substandard lot sizes, difficult slopes or soil conditions, or were adjacent to the lakeshare. Existing and projected sewer colmections to downstream laterals are shown in Table 4C-8. Table 4G8: Review of Orono Sewer Connections 2008-2030 Updated 3-17-10 Downstream Interceptors (Direct Connects to 7113 and 7113A) Eaistinc Projected Additional Connections(REC's) MUSA Part/Descri tion �onnecr�o�s p as of 1/1/OA (Residential connections in bold type) Cih�LS/GS#s (REC's) 2010 2010-2020 2020<030 Add Total Add "I'otal Add Total Part Vl:Bluffs/Orono Ln/W. Ferndale LS-1 56' +0 = 56 +1 = 57 +0 = 57 Part V[I: Co. Rd. 15 Marinas GS-6 1. Residential 3 +0 = 3 +2 = 5 +0 = 5 2. Non-residential a. Marine Max 6 +0 = ( +0 = 6 +0 = 6 b. Genmar/Minnetonka Marine 5 +p = j +0 = 5 +0 = 5 Part VIIl: Crystal Bay LS-2 l. Residential 78 +0 = 78 +2 = 8p +0 = 80 2. Non-Residential a. Mtka An Center 8 +p = g +2 = 10 +p = ]0 b. Environmental School 1 +0 = i +Q = � +0 = 1 c. Sailor's World Marina 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 d.US Post Office 1 +0 = 1 -r 0 = 1 +0 = 1 Part XVIII: Nettles Propem� LS-2 1 +0 = ] +0 = 1 +0 = 1 Part XX[I: Orono Orchards LS-10 23 +2 = 25 +2 = 27 +0 = 27 Part XXIV: Webber Hills LS-2 23 +9 = 32 +5 = 37 +0 = 37 Part XaV: Edgewood Hills LS-1 8 +0 = 8 +i = 9 +0 = 9 Part XXVI: Bracketts Point GS-9 17 +0 = 17 +0 = 17 +0 = 17 Part?CXVII: Foxhill LS-2 19 +2 = 21 +3 = 24 +0 = 24 Part XXVIII: Ba��ridge/E[anwood GS-10 to LS-2 8 +0 = 8 +7 = 15 +0 = 15 Part XXXV1: Bluffs Extensions LS-1 3 +0 = 3 +1 = 4 +0 = 4 Part XXXVII:Tanager Lake GS-9 4 +4 = 12 +16 = 24 +0 = 24 Part XXXVIII:Murphy North Shore LS-2 0 +0 = 0 +20 = 20 +l0 = 30 Part XXXXII:French Lake Shoreland LS-2 3 +2 = 5 +25 = 30 +15 = 45 Total Direct Residential Connections 246 +19 = 265 +$j = 350 +25 = 375 IntercePtor Non-Res.Connections 24 +0 = 24 +2 = 26 +0 = 26 Connection REC's TOTAL RECs 270 289 376 401 Total Direct Interceptor Connection Flow Rate 27.0 28.9 37.6 401 (MGY) 'Does not include flows from Woodhill Country Club which are generated in Wayzata. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-48 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan 4. WAYZATA SYSTEM EXTENSIONS: Sewer laterals which connect to extensions of the Wayzata sewer system along Orono's eastern boundar_y. CONSTRUCTION 6 Projects 1970-2009: ]970 Project(Chevy Chase/North Ferndale) 1977 Project(private) (Herrick Circle) 1979 Project(private) (Northgate) 1980 Project(3 West Ferndale Homes) 2003 Project(Old Long Lake Road) 2009 Project(Myrtlewood/850-875 Wayzata Blvd) This portion of the Orono municipal sewer system functions as an extension of the Wayzata system serving existing housing adjacent to the Wayzata border. The majority of the system was extended in 1970 to provide sewer (and water) to the existing Chevy Chase neighborhood. The two private projects provide service to small developments of vacant land within the service area. As in the case of Hackberry, the surrounding land use is very low density rural residential. There is design capacity in this system only to service the existing vacant residential lots with no capacity allocated for any future system expansion. These 65 units flow directly into the Wayzata system and are therefore not included in the design capacity of the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor. Existing and projected connections to the Wayzata lateral system are shown in Table 4C-9. Table 4C-9: Re��iew of Orono Sewer Connections Updated 3-17-10 Wa zata Direct Connections MUSA Part/Description Existing Projected Additional Connections(REC's) Connections (Residential connections shown in bold type) 2008 (REC's) 2010 2010-2020 2020-2030 Orono LS# Add Total Add Total Add Total Part IV: Herrick Circle 6 +0 = 6 +0 = 6 +0 = 6 Part V: Chevy Chase/Ferndale Green 58 +0 = 58 +2 = 60 +0 = 60 Part XL• Hwy 12 E. (875 Wayzata Blvd.) 0 +0 = 0 +36 = 36 +0 = 36 Part XIV: Fairway Hills Addition 2 +p = 2 +0 = 2 +0 = 2 Part XXXXIII: Old Long Lake Road 1 +7 = $ +0 = 8 +0 = 8 Part XXXXV: Myrtlewood 0 +9 = 9 +1 = 10 +0 = 10 Part XXXXIX: 8�0 Wayzata Boulevard 0 +3 = 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 Part VI: West Ferndale GS-5 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 Total Wayzata Residential Connections 70 +16 = 86 +39 = 125 +0 = 125 Direct Non-Res. Connections 0 +3 = 3 +0 = 3 +0 = 3 Connection REC's TOTAL RECs 70 89 128 128 Total Wayzata Direct Flow Rate(MGY) 7.0 8.9 12.8 12.8 City of Orono Communitv Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G49 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan A lateral to serve 8 existing homes was constructed in 2003 along Old Long Lake Road (MUSA Part XXXXIII). Future connections in this area abutting Wayzata include the property at 875 Wayzata Boulevard (MUSA Part XI) and 10 existing homes in the Myrtlewood neighborhood (MUSA Part XXXXV). The property at 850 Wayzata Boulevard (proposed MUSA Part XXXXIX) is an existing Montessori school that is being re-guided in this Plan for Institutional use, and would also be served by the Myrtlewood system. Three additional homes are connected to a short extension of the Wayzata system on West Ferndale Road where a channel crossing was avoided by connecting to the Wayzata system. �. PLYMOUTH DIRECT CONNECTIONS. In addition to the 4 service areas, the City has one property directly connected to the Plymouth municipal system, St. Edwards Church on North Ferndale Road. This property is MUSA Part XXXXL No further connections to the Plymouth system are anticipated at this time. Table 4G10: Review of Orono Sewer Connections Plymouth Direct Connections Existing Projected Additional Connections (REC's) Connections MUSA Part/Description 2008 2010 ZO10-2020 Zp20-2030 (REC's) �� Add Total Add Total Add Total �� t. Edwa-ds Church - � ` (Propose MUSA Part XXXXI) 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 � � Total�ly uth Direct 5 0 5 0 5 p 5 � � Conn ctio EC's � f� Total Ply uth Direct Flow 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 � Rate (MG u Th municipal sanitary sewer design capacities listed in the 1977 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan (CSPP) plan were those ultimate capacities utilized for final design of the Orono-Long Lake interceptor. A major function of Orono's 1977 Comprehensive Sewer Plan was the engineering review and analysis of the ultimate design capacity of the Orono municipal sewer system as necessary criteria for the final design of MWCC's Orono-Long Lake Interceptor. The municipal system was analyzed by McCombs-Knutson Associates to determine the actual number of existing and potential users, the critical pipe size and slope, the lift station capacities and the expectable rates for average and peak flows. The study methods and raw data were assembled in the appendix section of the 1980 CSPP as they appeared in the 1977 CSP. The net system capacity was summarized in Table 4Gll. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G50 �� . . � CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan � � � Table 4C-11: 1980 TOTAL ORONO MiTNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEM CAPACITY � � ; 1980 Basis for Unit Calculation: 1 unit= 115 gpd/capita x 3.2 persons per HH=368 gpd System Existing Units Reserve Units Ultimate Design � � 1980 1980 Capacity � Southwest Orono LS-59 1.51 l 1,099 2,610 Orono Schools/Hi hwa 12 incl. Hackber LS-60 125 l20 245 "Orono Injectors'' (future connections to downstream 0 163 163 � , interce tors) � Total Flow to Interce tors 1,636 1,382 3,018 � Interceptor Design Capacity Assigned to Orono 3,025 Units (3,025 units x 368 GPD x 365 da / r=406 MGY) (406 MGY) Wavzata S��stem 54 � 1 1 65 TOTAL ORONO UNITS 1,690 1,393 3,083 (414 MGY) The 3,025 unit assigned design capacity far Orono was based on a unit equivalent of 115 gpd/capita and 3.2 persons per household, or 368 gpd. The City's current estimates far future flows are based on a Residential Equivalent Connection (REC) value of 274 gpd. Table 4C-12 provides a summary of existing and projected flows for Orono by interceptor for the period 2008-2030, and compares this to the assigned capacity for Orono as indicated in the Met Council's 2005 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Under current projections which include land use changes proposed in the Land Use Plan of this 2008-2030 CMP, potential Orono flow rates will slightly exceed _ the annual flows forecasted by Met Council through 2030, but do not exceed the Interceptor Design Capacity assigned to Orono as indicated in Table 4C-11. Table 4C-12: Review of Orono Sewer Connections Updated 3-]7-10 Sewer Connections and Wastewater Flows 2008-2030 (By Interceptor Service Area) Interceptor Se1'�'ice Area Existing Projected Connections (REC's) Connections 2oos(REC's) 2010 2020 2030 Metro Lift Station 59 (Orono) 1660 1690 1800 1835 Metro Lift Station 60(Long Lake) 502 585 1 122 l 173 Downstream Interceptors 270 289 376 401 (Direct connects to 7113 and 71 13A) Wayzata Direct Connections 70 89 ]28 12g Plymouth Direct Connections 5 5 5 5 Total REC's 2507 2658 3431 3542 Total Annual Flow Potential (MGY) 250.7 265.8 343.1 354.2 Avg. Annual Flow Potential (MGD) 0.69 0.73 0.94 0.97 2005 Met Council Forecast: --- 0.63 0.70 0.71 Av . Annual Flow (MGD) Note: Avera�e Annual Metered Flow for the 5-year period 2003-2007 was 0.51 MGD City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G51 CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan SEWER FACILITIES PLAN Orono's Plan for future sewer facilities includes upgrades to certain existing local sewer facilities as well as retrofitting a small number of existing neighborhoods with municipal sewer service. These system improvements and expansions are not expected to require addi�ional capacity allocation in metropolitan sewer facilities. Any potential need for additional capacity in metropolitan systems is tied directly to past revisions to the Land Use Plan in 2000 which allowed for increased housing density. The increased housing density was necessary in order to meet identified City housing needs as well as to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's life-cycle housing goals. The existing population and household ratio is split 70% sewered and 30% using septic systems. There are estimated for year 2008 approximately 3,350 occupied and vacant residences in Orono of which 2,300 are connected to sewer and 1,050 utilize on-site systems. In terms of Residential Equivalent Connections or REC's (1 REC = 274 gpd = 100,000 gpy), Orono in year 2008 is estimated to have 2,585 REC's (as compared to 2,420 REC's in 2000 and 1,987 REC's in 1990) which translates to an annual flow of 258.5 million gallons per year. Orono's actual annual flows for 1985- 2007 are shown in the following chart: Annual Sewer Flows 1985-2007 300 262 250 250 I 241 232 I214 224 221 221 219 227 208 213 201 200 190 194 �91 193 � 167 175 179 178'� � 161 158 3 i ° 150 I i _ i a I 100 50 II p ' _ . _ _ _. ..._ _ . _. _ _ ^�'��.�'06�.�'�� ^�0��.90��A�'�qA�'I`.��u''L.�°�u''y^�+v'a^°�o��^��'6 r�°�o'� .�A�'0.�°��i ��O ��,• ��`L ��'S ��P ��0 ��0 O�'` ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti The CSPP element of the 1980 CMP indicated an ultimate interceptor design capacity assigned to Orono of 3,025 units based on a flow of 368 gpd per unit (115 gal/person/day x 3.2 persons/household) totaling 1.14 mgd or 416 million gallons per year (MGY). Current City forecasts as shown in Tables 4C-11 and 4C-12 indicate that Orono's estimated annual flows for 2010, 2020 and 2030 are expected to be equal to or less than the ultiinate interceptor design capacity. City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G�2 CMP Part 4C. Comnrehensive Sewer Policv Plan Orono has sufficient land available in the Rural Area for the level of rural unsewered development currently forecasted. Likewise, Orono has sufficient land in the existing urban area and in the few areas re-guided in 2000 from rural to urban development, to allow for the forecast levels of urban development. The urban and rural development forecasts have been derived from careful analysis of available land on a parcel by parcel basis, taking into account recent development trends and the City's intended development types and densities for each parcel. In the period 1980-1999 Orono added approximately 500 new residential connections to the municipal sewer system, the majority of which were the result of installation of sewer lines to serve existing residential development. Many of the neighborhood housing clusters served were adjacent to a metropolitan interceptor and made use of interceptor injector stations. In the period 2000-2008 an additional 400 new residential units were connected to the municipal system. Approximately half of these were connections for new multi-family dwelling units; most of the remainder were connections of existing homes in neighborhoods where new sewer laterals had been installed. Infill development in the urban area accounted for a small number of these additional units. During the period 2008-2030, anticipated residential connections will be from three primary sources: 1) new urban-density residential development occurring along the Highway 12 corridor in north central Orono; 2) connections of existing homes in neighborhoods previously retrofitted with municipal sewers to solve sewage treatment problems; and 3) additional retrofitting of neighborhoods within the Shoreland areas added to the MUSA in 2000. The primary impacts will be to the LS-60 interceptor service area. While Orono's other interceptor service areas will experience only modest flow rate increases, Orono flows to LS-60 are eapected to double by 2030, primarily due to new residential development, but partially due to additional commercial and institutional development. Because most of the planned urban-density housing in this area is expected to be completely developed by 2020, Orono's total flows are expected to be at the high end of Met Council's flow estimates for 2010, but nearer the low forecast for 2020 and 2030 (see Table 4C-12). Orono's projected sewer facility use and capacity needs are indicated in Table 4C-13. Population and household projections are included. These are based upon actual building permit records during 2000-2007 as well as on City expectations for future development based on current and planned zoning and extension of sewers to the areas added to the MUSA in 2000. Future capacity needs for potential future MUSA expansions under the criteria listed herein, are not included in these projections. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G�3 , � CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan Table 4G13: Projected Sewer Facility Use and Capacity Requirements 2010-2030 (U dated 3-17-10) POPULATION DWELLING UNITS SEWER UN[TS MGl' MGl' Sewered Se tic Total Sewered Se tic Total Res. Non-Res. Total Actual Forecast EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 1980-2000 1980 Actual 3,975 2,870 6,845 1,437 1,036 2,473 1,437 240 1,677 - 168 pph=2.99 1990 Actual 4,430 2,855 7,285 1,692 1,095 2,787 1,692 295 1,987 196 l99 pph=2.79 2000 Actual 4,773 2,765 7,538 1,844 1,065 2,909 1,844 425 2,269 191 227 h=2.73 ESTIMATED EXISTING CONDITIONSAS OF 1/1/08 2008 (Est.) 5,425 2,625 8,050 2,200 1,000 3,200 2,200 360 2,560 178 256 PPh=2.62 (2007) FORECAST DET�ELOPMENT 2010-2030 2010 5,800 2,500 8,300 2,256 944 3,200 2,256 402 2,658 - 266 h=2.59 2020 7,000 2,500 9,500 2,950 1,000 3,950 2,950 481 3,431 - 343 h=2.40 2030 7,300 2,500 9,800 3,020 1,080 4,100 3,020 522 3,542 - 354 h=2.40 Map 4C-2 indicates the location of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) within Orono for year 2010 and beyond. The MUSA does not coincide with the boundary between urban and rural Orono as discussed elsewhere in this Community Management Plan. As indicated in the preceding table, forecast growth in sewer facility use will occur primarily within Orono's Urban Area, but may also occur to a limited extent in the portions of the Rural Area that are within the MUSA. Sewer facilities planning for urban Orono is based upon inventory and analysis of the various con�ributing areas to the existing municipal system. The review of Orono Sewer Com�ections (See Tables 4C-3 and 4C-4) includes an analysis of expected development within each of the 4� existing MUSA areas as well as the areas proposed to be added to the MUSA. For purposes of sewer facilities planning, this expected growth is divided into five categories: 1) INCREASED FLOW FROM EXISTING USERS. In the case of building expansion or increased occupancy, higher flows could be expected through existing service connections. No new municipal sewer facilities are required. 2) INFILL URBAN DEVELOPMENT. In the case of development of existing vacant urban properties, new connections can be expected through existing service stubs. No new n�unicipal sewer facilities are required. City of Orono Communit�� Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4G54 . CMP Part 4C. Comprehensive Sewer Policv Plan 7) EXISTING INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - The On-Site Management Program is expected to continue enforcing major improvements to, or replacement of, existing on-site systems per City ordinances if and when they are determined to be failing. Table 4C-15 indicates the anticipated new sewer connections by year during the period 2010-2020. Note that because there is no defined staging for addition of these connections, the timing shown below is at best speculative and should not be construed as a staging plan. .� Table 4C-1�: Expected New Sewer Connections (RECs) by Year: 2010-2020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Interce tor LS-59 1� 1� 1� 10 l� 10 1� 10 1� 1� l� ll� Ls-6o 10 50 100 50 100 50 40 40 40 30 27 537 Downstream Interceptors 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 87 wayzata Direct 5 �0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �9 Plymouth Direct � 0 � 0 � � � 0 � � � � 1'ota�New Connections 33 98 120 70 118 68 58 58 58 48 44 773 CONSTRUCTION DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW SEWERS The original segments of the Orono sewer system date to 1963-1965 when the lateral system serving much of the Navarre area was installed, connecting to what is now the Metro forcemain system ending at LS-59 on Old Crystal Bay Road South. The initial lateral system was constructed of clay tile, which is now 40- plus years old and beginning to show signs of abing, such as shifting, cracking, and increased infiltration problems. Because portions of the system are at or below the level of Lake Minnetonka, infiltration management has been an ongoing task for the City. In the 1970s a shift to use of PVC pipe occurred for new installations, reducing the incidence of joint failure and thus reducing the potential for infiltration. Graviry Sewers vs Pressure Sewers. Historically, Orono strived to provide gravity sewer system laterals wherever possible for ease of maintenance and to allow for direct connections to homes with minimal homeowner maintenance responsibility. However, a number of factors have changed this, including: - the substantially lower construction costs of a pressure system vs. a gravity system; Citv of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 4C-61 ;�'.�v�SIo N A S S�(�."�,ti-'f (,f�L��LU�y' _ 9800 A MW B i0W C 3(AO D 3200 E 2 . F ZOpp G 2000 H 1600 I 12(p ] 800 M qpp L 0 lp�_ I I I I I I I I I 51%TH F —1200 � .R� � � � 2008 MUSA and Planned , � �- � Expansions �� _� z WAYZ,r��o. -��-�� z City of Orono aoo— � T.M.13 � �. °`° Minnesota e.ns.a �- '0° � mAnu� �W,. 3 < � � Part XX)0(VI 3 � Recreational Treil a— _o �Railroad Right-of-Way roF � art��w��r �!Area within the 2008 MUSA a �_J Proposed Additions to the 2008 MUSA a � Parcels 90°— � O en Water tiqP Part xx)occVl o --aoo I_.J P ry 9� u�� o � �O 5 R `, 5 Proposed MUSA Additions eoo— — — rvcH oa Part xxXxVtl �,,,,, —� Gross Net Dry 2oning MUSA PART Additional NameAdentifier � °�P :�.a ur � (acres) (acres) DistriR 6 u ' Part XXXXVI 5 8 15 Brown Rd S 4.3 4.3 RR-t B 6 __'. �" � Part XXXXVII 465&525 Leaf St 6.5 6.0 RR-1 B �zoo o I I —�zoo Part XXXXVIII 3060 Fox St 1 A'I 0.95 RR-1 B � Part XXXXIX 850 Wayzata Bivd 6.2 5.0 RR-1B � � ai� � _ � . � � ' P,�tr ys 24.o s o -16 ��- � v � -�� ,""' e , ' � ,.,�.,.a.,�. , w - � � "'� , - � B �- '� � � � A, � �°�"�" � � � - z� S �._ ' ' ._,.'.' _.' J' 1 1 9 � � � 9 0 3000 6000 z4ao— � � — —. J � Sc�al-fee' .. � �.. �� ,.v rme —zaoo � w`� ) / / io �wn�,,,� t" � �� m ��'¢ 1`TC�\ Za°°- ; � �' �'�O� � °�)� �Bonestroo ��. , -z� , �t:x.. � 0 � !��+ �'��r�'��'�� , , � ,� � � ,' \��of r � , _�, , �.._.._.._ _.._,._.._,._... u 3200— ` \ � � � � �� -3� MAP 4C-2 i800 A 4q0 B 4000 `C�� .36W U 32U1 E 2800 F 2900 G 2000 H 1600 I 1200 ] �0 K 900 L 0 �� '��P��-t� iM��, ,�r,�,r'?�?�'�k:x , n �/�Srw'� ti — - c--�, 'v� ��"�.,��-�( . a800 " "°° B '°°° �°° ° _ _ �° F =^� G z� „ ,� , 1z� , � � � � o Orono MUSA Expansion � I 3200 E 2 1700 — '__�._..�.._.._.._..�.._.. .��.--.'� _ CO. I I � SIXMAVENUEN ._.._.._ � _'_�._'�" _."'_'_'_ _ .. __.._ "_'"_._'� ]200 ao b ,�, H istory � x�,x xx , ` ' °�` x � z°°' City of Orono � �^°"" � �_ � X x } I , 9� � �, ;9� x ; „„„„ roo; ,�,�_ I Minnesota � � " - ix u �` ��z,m . � � zoai s°° ..P,...,.,... 1987 �� flrme 11NSA Fq��n�m Ifiwm�Ipt�1�1� , , _ _ �<�, � , _�.. ��w°::":. . .�o.d.., 'w v t X xui c.�� z i � w4rE. . Z — t99J � � (+�'eq ti,a... iW miv..a . RTpwN ` ^xx 0.o JocX%III ' � �� ¢ B.N.S.R. xx% � ` �"�.. �� 2003 � � � �. �\ �. Cq� � v I...G...� � ;� � � 19nG� � %%XIV fOACII 1� �XV) � a� .�� 3 a � .(�� I � $ m �1001 1997\� �X%N%1% _ IN vn . n�.�.,o P� ,,A, .. � F</ry� � XXX%VI � . � 3 � �y� �n III � �-- —' , rv � mn '_� "( . & �9Rn � � . ' �1980 � ' � r� 9 ��.._....._._._ .�— o �w � ��4-�.. � � '�a� � '. '� reee _�� werzerw nv � — — u ,rv . ,,. . ...n .,.s, 5.,.q3 a�e �:. ]993 O �v -.. �...�a..�i . .. .�..� �-uc� ...... 9 I - . � . �.._..1 f--1 —_ zn �� . . . 1 . � � svu .. . ..rnr s� e aa�e %VI I C-7 I 1997 -� �tlll � � � _ _ 100 � a Y.- �S �op� ,� . �x%%�cvn a' �vs5 �' ..J aao � � � . ' � _ q9� � � J%%%INIII o / / 13 y %%XVI(` �` � �� n 5 I �'P � )001 � s . �. .. a »ooaitm � x �, s r , :00 _ . _, 1946 �NP�' L� � � na IwE57 6R+W61 RO '�. %X%XV I I I �"." -" p`pf,�'� %%%VII� 800 � �' � ,aa � �� 2001 ( p Jpplur � . XViI �P r� � _ 6 I��-� `�t993 OP� � �VI[ � "e� 'v'�x�IDn 19P1 1 6 _ _ —.— -- - � w��lcn.io�er) � ua I �� X%V11�� ':.� � 1�vm�nw�. n9 n RRIB 1200— XII .� 9�,� � � - 09 ..,.,��.�.oi is La-� %%xtYltl � Opj�"' I 1200 �� E�Ol .V I '� L_-.] %VIII �%%VI � � - � . � � 199J� 1996 L 1 ' I ' � — L..` � ] — zi�xu� rea.a w na3 io-n-o� �s art�e ' i xxYV1I1 � ?zi+�v s �su ner. �o-e-m � aa.ie .` ...._'—_ I600 � ],OOI �_.. %XVIII I � �saxv rn.a w... rxri �o-�o> » 2a�e '�l�r �� /� ��., 1996 ' —l� G �lol ''ue'i � � 1 C—] n.oua e � a�,y, � \.� . uia�maa�wa� 1 �7 �. �...e i � ' 8 D.mo.h.dt.11d+.rllRi OK...y .u�l.u.�oriboft..�vt.�. Nt. �1-Oo.nw p �L �..�. z000 I �'" . eroMu � 1 I N asial zooa L,_ � i � �,._..�._._..J , ' � �Q Cy" ' W E � SRt/MO � � 1 � 9 IAR�C C� 2900 �..��.1 / � J � �'� ,,,,�,�,,,, i znoo 0 3000 6000 � . � "�, Nf / � ' _ �RA(Z � m `"'� t.. � '�,,,,,^'^ �� Scale in feet a.v i �vwnm i� �o - �� ' w c � �/��!� � � 2e� ((° °`�� '�Bonestroo , ,�.,�,. , , , , , , _ ' ' t;''' �' „ � . , , � , ,- �.._._.._ _._.._.._.._... �, ��?�.�}./� �� '� �� :zA,., 4a� q <�00 B <� 'z , ,� o ,Z� E ,� F �� ' � 3200 MAP 4G2 Supplement � z000 H ieoo � iZoo � eoo k aoo i o �,,,wa„.,�,s«w.oas . , MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCII, MEMBERS FROM: TOM KELLOGG, CITY ENGINEER/SCOTT OBERAIGNER, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR SUBJECT: 2485 Di.JNWOODY AVENUE SEWER SERVICE QUOTATION DATE: MARCH 22, 2010 The attached information related to the sewer service at 2485 Dunwoody Avenue will be discussed at the work session. ' � \ .� � s � � \ � I � IXMH-245 � \ MH-251 � ,; i ;� — > � ' � Dunwoody Avenue � _l_� _�, � i � �"� � _. �.:� � � i � � , , � k I � � � � � � i � 7 ,�� I � Bulkhead I � . —� � I I I �� Abandoned I I i I I � I �, Services I I � " � � � � .1 I �I � I I � n �,�� I �� 1 �1 � I � � n I \ � � II I � ` n � I I � I� � � �� ,� I I � � I I I I — L � — � R�'/f / � / �� I I �� — _ _ �� ''i i � � � � �� — ;� 5 � �;I I 2485 I � r J � ulkhead I �,j � � � � _ J� � /V I r - - , ' _ J if I � � —i r _ .� I I � 2505 � � � 25 i � - - -- � � � J � � � I � I � � � � -- - - � - -- - - J IShown on As-Builts i ---> ---- Actual Conditions '—� i -----> ------ New Service Installed I i � � 2477 � Existing Clean Out L_ I J � 0 50 100 Scale in feet 2485 Dunwoody Sanitary Sewer Issue � City of Orono FIGURE: 1 Bonestroo Casco Point Reconstruct Project 13908023C401S-2485 SEWER ISSUE.DWG DATE: 3/17/10 COMM: 000139-08023-0 `� �� . _ � — :`�°�`. ��'�'=��'.�� . � ,c, ��—Z`--�,�;_ —`�� _ ��` � ' �\ \ ,,._ _ :�.�, �� . �—�--�--- --�--- J �, � _ . . . �� i �....'._..."��,""�„-.—�-��"�'� d � � ��y'�r vfe,�c,.d's�r�'. � .. � � � �, ��. � �� ,�Edc�eka ►�: � � '� . � � i ;r � �� -- i — —- — -- _ ,�..:,---- � � . � � � �'' �v�H � � I � ' � Z' (3��H � '� � . � '�..- � � � � � � �� I � \ W � � � �'^ � � . � � 27 ��`'� - — z \ � ` � � � , � ' � �'� ' � � ,:.. _...�..�,� - `` �, . � � '\ � � � �.� .� � �.t.l � � i . . . � �, , � ��. �L _ � `� ' , ' � �1 � � � �' �'� '� � � = �; � �. � � _ � � ��.-� � � � , � p • p�As V�. (� , { F -- — � � � I P, � � � �� a � i . � �� `� � � .. � � � � . � � ; [�.. �.�,� �� , � I ��. � �� _ _ __. --- !. :�....._ p '� C3 ��" oqv. � � I . . `• ; '4; ,��•� c4_ � , . � �� • � � ��f� � � � � ' ,�r ( �, Z��06'+�`� � . _ _ ___ . i i � ��, �� I i � �r ..�..--- e.r..A... . ��._... ��r ��6►t{.I iy y�e'�' � � ' � `°'°�°�� ----�, .�-�-�� .. . � CL/� � i P � �i � � I � 1 � � U >� � . . �, i � � c� `__`� . ,`": ,t . ' Y., � � � j:01 � ` vxt "�I v� �( U�; L�� .��iL i��1V' . �,,ta,��i�">'�'�r,;i� ._._._ _ . . _ . � �� '� � ,a,J;y�� a_S. ..... _. .. .__.. . �4 :}ti � �a e,l� ' .,,T�.�,� ,._-___. ------_ _ � ' , , � ,� � ��. � - �[`�.�A..j ... ..._._ __`"_._'._. .. .. .. __ ? . .. . . } 'j�(� M, ��( r�t �;.�7 ... t1�"�13G{a . ._ _.._.�t+-- � �� ..r � �f� k;' { �'+ � �i �'�,a � , , ,. � ��r k. _A__�___..__ c,?_ � ,�. .� _ _. �' � � ... r' '' ` ' - �� S � „ , _, f ; � , �' �+;� _ ---- --- _- -__ _ __ _ _ .� � � 7 � � `s F:+ ` , �'- �{4:� ; �: u� � ,�. -- ----- - - _ _ _ � � . � �� c. �� I � W'< < '� ---- - --- - �- - - _ --. _ . `a n _ _ _ - - 1 1'`:� ;b � .d i� � � o � � � , ,� , o ��__ -. r -- - .__ w �_ —� _ - - _. ..-- --- - .� � � ry i" A � � ., _ � / � ,, -': � �_ _ � +,� r �. .,---� --._. _ . -- - v C?� _ _, r, � � l, '° � � �� .y � � j :. Lti11 �1,� � � W � ( ` ' .'r --''�-- -__ _. _ ___ . . _ _ � R� __. � � -- ; s� .r� , t s�,ti . �.) � tIJ "'3 �ra '4 --�`n =�- --- --_ _..__ 3-� n � il) p _ _ _. _ ' z ';� ` v� �f b R+ � GS � .c i , ".<" �. _Y� � � _ . . _ T .T , � , ..,._ -- -- -- _. -� _ �� ' `f iP..ry . , f�� _� �f � }�1 f S� �� ,:, �. � . . . .. . .__ E _..-�.'_ �.__�_ '_. ____ .._.� ..... __.___ __ . . . . . . . _._.._. �� : .; . _ _ ;__ i cQ ��'w � ; ; � ,3 . _ ,_ _.,. __. ,�___ 00._ -___ ____ � 4} `�t � , r Y'r,�r.� . � ; / : � � _..-- t5 i3..G{' � .i . .. . . . . . . .. _., . . . ___ ! ' �....:.. __._... ._.._. .. ... ._ . _. . .' _ . ' f � � � � ` �� O R7�`[�3: `'' ; _ � -- - 1�t .'y Y 1 ' '"_' ._" __"_.... . _ _ �� . �1 ��if .:U : 1 � �. ,., i � � ! � . '� ; . � / �fM�{`'�� . ' ':" . . . . . _ . . . . . . . _ _ _... _ . � . . .._ -..-_'."'_ :�� VCI^{ti� '.---+• '--.I ..-'__'_' __"...'_._ _. . .... _.,.. .. .... ./:� . xl'.1 't1" 1 � ��p�� : ,,x��,,,k� :;< �` _ _ _- _ _ _ � � _ ---_. . ,. T .. - f�y�� . ---., ��q .• , �� ,,� , -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _... , , � -- - 7 � . 1 3 �l 4 $r� , '�- .,._ ; ' . .�,�,��'�`�S� �: -•'— - -------- -_'. _ . __._ _ _ _ _ _. _ ____. 't�'' ��'n� � / _ ^4', �� . � . _ � � , � Q _ _ _ _ _-. -=- - ---. _ z ^ f�` ~ � ,_ J � � - :;ftF�� . ' - - -- . . . _ �. � _� �. . . . a ��F�_____.- � „• -----.. � - -_ ___ _ , _ , � �_ - _ _c ; �f�` f��J:p .`�.. � �� , . . ' . .. . . . . . . . _ � O. � _ .. _. .._.. __ .'_ _ �..._r f q5 ' �.' ,�'f/J'� �\'5�-- -�^__...� -_- ,. �_..__..__._..._""_._ ._...'. ___. ._. . . . .� F � C. .'S � �T:� . `�� ^'-• ' ' '- � ; . � . . . � � " � C T �'� � t i - _ ._.._.. .. ......... . .... ... . . . _ _ .. . . _ __ � ) �� d ~A I � '__. ,"_._.'_._ ,f. � �kf�� 1�'.' �-� G � ; � � �� .e.� \ f ' . _ __ . _ . _ _ �? _ .. . ?_. i�t�,, __(� — --- --- - _ � r '�- �4� �i 1 , . � .' . '�.\. . � '-� . . •]�/, _`{� ti;, - .fly �. .. vl---• ""'�+ _ ._.._ ... ......... ...... ` y. . .. . .. .. . .. , � ... . . _. . -_ . . C C �y � � C � — � I � � I,t `-- � ',_ ^ i } � ; : �; ta ,7� . �-�=� - - - -- ,.... _. ^ - r� _ V � _ F'f J� __ � R! S; ..� -,5 t� ; , w . ,�- _ , . X� ___ _ . c _ _c : �� r � ----"-'- . .. . _- �---'.. .._..e.. _ . . ' . . ^- .. . .- \, :; �� .:' : -. .' - \ �j � � , Q n � ' �' � '� ;, , , . tty f34�•��-, �� .� , __ _ � ., � � � ,r --- T `'� � � � v 41 � � � --_ . � : �i � . � i'i �l � ', �1 � �1i r , � , r;---- ___.—_ . ---. ... __ _ � ',�t, __ 00. � �!: �L� �b : s `,,�y' � .r- C C. � \S v G� • y. : Y s i `\ � � �,.1, >'�� : f;,. � � - ' F .�M ,�/ '/•%, /�J �' ' q r. ;:� �L t ��. 7 L �� 's ;,�{{ � � , 3 �r� F�` ' � �� f ,;� / ' �':� 't . � t t':.,1 I � �.Ji�. "d i �� ; ,;,�! . � e . � :n; � ;., � �.�,�.t� ' ' � _ � - iti� �Cr `::i — _ :-- ._� --� � � ,_ I ! ��.��`:.j ..-_._" . -_ -- = r �=, �, ``_ � ! �, �, . � ^, :�;' , ,� � �J _ _- ---* , � �f;,' •! � — ---- -�--— -- ----- - --�---�--- � �— ------- I � � _�� r 4t�,� �I ---_'�' �/� . r ' � �� ; ��` , I � �;� � - � � � _ -------., ��=4�;� � `�• i ,, a Vj I �� `' t/�/Cl 1�.../ � .7 C�j ....<�. Y= �� t�_ ""'' � ` f �. . � C /f � � ;� C� � �c.� ' �' � /, :r'_t (;'r 1:.:c� /"-"c � - ' ',=;.'4`';{.:� ;, � i "7 5 ' `� '�i C I.. �I� u � ; / �`,-,� <<�._ f�Y4 � � G `, r r ' .r _ `- - ~G + %,�5 i� �. / . a a=„�. � / �- I?It �� .� C �' �.-c =%.-_.�� I <�.i' ,�Y'�`�J'"Rl� �.r . �3;! (�, �yx.ltr�:� � . .*5,,��o'..:a'� �__�-- P� tr � � ° ' C ;�: c� I �,��-• �. � r �ti,,�,� �--_�._�-----' j � :�.t'�� r F r�S I I 't - i { ` \ � ��e.c.j . -_ —.---_ �- "ti.6 a: I�yA .. Y''��`�t «� �;< �� '/ �! �f,'" /'_ . - .1 `; L �,—�� j � .L�.�c � Ci.�/ << � �-.. .. �".!: ;.:9 .. �� r C ,af �_ � .. . _ � - y �—� r, -r _ -, r'. . 'c — `� �c' � " c r �.- . .�� / � � , -�' �'�� 1 �� ( t �� ,r � . , " �^ G. '7 I�, (G . ��/� C_ �C _. , ` � " � / � /� f �� --�� / � /l i /,��, i:^�� L- � .f'. ..§ / i+��! '1 ' `,c ' P � ,Y , `—, � —�— ° ' �'�� ' . _.l_ � �� :, , �. /:� -- 1� ,i .Y � � ' lS ,� � _ � ,� c_J , /4/ i . / -L !� �C l c'G'�� =� (��; �i> r �L � �'. ' i i i '_.j /f Jy '�/ � �� -- Cl :�; .-_ �� • 4`',- 1 L-_ C/ Z � � -T-� (_; �' -� �� . 5 �7 (�' �. <' � '� ;>:� ,a ; . �f� � , ..� l � I , ♦ . �\.. / .' �/7� � �� `7 "-7 L' .� ' f r `y 'T_ ` c��-_ ->�-C_ �� _ '� � � T� . i.,�q � l e_ - . ��I'� t/ '`1 .� ��`':-� � "..1,v"L�. "'_�� i ' /-! .? � l.� _ /^ �� / "- i� '� — -- ^-li-- - � „ �� "%� !�. � �; . % , �' � f '�?� --/ ,'/ :1•i��:-��M�t;� / -� � � ^-�r C� 1t-L1�C,^._ ✓ (7 � �� : ' � � ' 1 /(� /1_.I-��. � � �8��I��I� �Bt�E[K �� ) ��°��5�� Du��€�� QUALITY OF V�/A,TER `—�--` 'i� UALITY OF LIFE 1Vlarch 16, 2010 �� The Minnhaha Creel< Honorable Mark Hanus �'/',�� Watershed District is City of Mound `�° committed to a leadership 5341 Ailaywood Road C��'�FO `��jC Mound, Miiulesota 55364 !� role in protecting, �NO improving and managing Re. Six IVlile Creelc Potential Land Acquisitions the surFace waters and Dear Mayor Hanus: affiliated groundwater Thanlc you for your input into the Mirulehaha Creek Watershed District's resources within the recommended Wetland and Shoreline iules changes. As we finalize this multi- year, public process, it's important to remeinber our goal and how we can District,including their continue to worlc together to achieve it. relationships to the The MCWD is committed to protecting water resources ecosystems of which Our lakes, streams and wetlands are among our region's most valuable they are an integra[pait resources. However, these resources and their quality face significant pressures and tlueats. Unprotected, water quality degradation will negatively We achieve our mission affect recreation, fish and other wildiife, and ultimately,property values near through regulation, affected water bodies. capita�.projects, That's why in 1967, state statute created the Minnehaha Creek Watershed education, cooperative District and other districts like it across Miruzesota. Since then, our District has remained focused on the mission of protectina water qualitv throu hout endeavors,and other the Miiulehaha Creek watershed. progiams based on The proposed revisions to the Wetland and Shoreline rules are designed to sound sdence, achieve public support and voTunta�-y compliance of best practices that Innovative thinking,an �'ill protect our region's water quality in a reasonable and cost-effective manner. It's a goal we take seriously, and based on much of the feedback we informed and engaged have received, it is a priority for many residents and communities. constituency, and the Wetland and Shoreline rules: A step in the ri�ht direction cost effective use of Led by our public Rule Making Task Force and Technical Advisory Coininittee (TAC), the District has undergone an extensive and very public public funds. pi•ocess to develop rules that meet our goals for improved water resources. Your consulting engineer, David Poggi, seived on the TAC. I3istrict managers and staff have listened to extensive public feedUack and continue to 13202 Minnetonl<a Eou�evard, Deephaven, MN 55391 � Omce: (952) 472-0590 � Fa;;: (952)471-OGo2 � www.ninnehahacreek.o�� 1. � have discussions with local officials and staf£ Final approval of the rules this spring will allow us to accomplish the following: Wetland Protection Rule ■ Protect regional wetlands to improve water quality � Encourage wetland replacement on a project site or within the watershed district ■ If construction occurs, tie wetland replacement to quality and location o Ensure monitoring and maintenance of newly established wetland buffers • Regulate wetland excavation currently not regulated by the Wetland Conservation Act Shoreline and Stream Bai�lc Stabilization Rule • Preseive natural shorelines to prevent erosion and protect water from runoff • Limit the amount of vegetation that can Ue removed fronl shore land while providing reasonable shoreline access to property ov�nlers • Align ne�w shoreline stabilization plans with potential erosion rislcs • Ensure riprap is used only when necessary and consistent with Department of Natural Resources policies ■ Allow maintenance of e�:isting riprap. We are respondin�to input We have appreciated the various comments avout these rules, and have listened carefully to the feedback. In response, we are revising our final reconunendations to help address community concerns while remaining true to our goals. Ainong the most significant concerns addressed are: • Who is affected — The new iules are not retroactive and will only affect redevelopment or new construction. Wetland rule triggers will remain unchanged. ■ Wetland requirements foi• homeowners— The Wetland iule will provide more flexible wetland buffer widths for new single-fainily home construction/tear-down rebuilds of single-family hoines. Existing single-fainily homes will not be affected. • Mitigating wetlands during construction—The rules will allow landowners to continue to use Wetland Conservation Act exemptions and give property owners more flexiUility. Increased wetland mitigation ratios for mitigation away fi-om the site of impact will be removed. Other revisions address concerns related to transportation projects and signage requirements. • Wetland monitoring and maintenance—The new rule ouly will require monitoring and inaintenance of wetland buffers that were disturbed by �ading during constructioil. ■ Riprap along shorelines—Property owners who cuizently have riprap shorelines will be allowed to repair and maintain their riprap as they do under the cun•ent rule. However, the District will establish a grant program to help interested property owners establish natural shorelines, which have been shown to do a better job of protecting water quality. The rule also focuses on preserving existing natural shorelines and streain banlcs— consistent with DNR rules. ° �1se�-�a-eend➢y p�ocess — The District and rules vvill provide a inore user-friendly process for determining erosion rislcs and llow to solve them. C��n��a�ga�� t�work wi�h v�e-u�aes s�:a➢�e��e�ea�s �Je understand thai some rule changes will continue to raise questions and we're committed to worlcing with your city aiid others to answer them. However, with the ultimate �oal of protecting and improving the water resources within the I�istrict; our process has been extensive at�d fair, and is responsive to reasonable comments from cities and the public. Sincerely, . /,.�. ��,(�,.�,�o ames Callciizs, Board of Managers President IViinnehaha Creek Watershed L7istrict cc. MWCD Board of Managers Kandis Hanson, l�ound City Manager Mound City Council Mayor Paul Skrede, City of Deephaven Mayor Nick IZuhl, City of Excelsior Mayor Deb Kind, City of Greenwood Mayor Marvin Johnson, City of Independence Mayor Randy Gilbert, City of Long Lake Mayor, Terry Scluzeider, City of Minnetoi�ica Mayor Joaru7 Anderson, City of Miruietonka Beach Mayor Cheryl Fischer, City of Minnet�•ista Mayor Jim White, City of Orono Mayor Kelli Slavik, City of Plyinouth Mayor Clu•is Lizee, City of Shorewood Mayor Mary Hershberger Thun, City of Victoria Mayor Ken Wilcox, City of Wayzata Nayor 3ames I)oalc, City of Woodland ��,,�� -+n v�<<��•�� :>. ��ot� Lakeshore Weeklj� Ne�ws � 1VIM � O E NTAR _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ __ _ ___. . __ �� v 1-��-1 � ___.__ ____ ____ ___ -----_ ___ ____ ___._ .____ FARGO- MOc - 5A ND BAG- ( ' M A�C 1 -T AE �� I � O CO�O �CUUR C�t�.L g Pve had sunshine on my mind recently stuff," said Council Member Jim Murphy. � � and I'in not just thinking about the weath- But he said �n�hen he watches other cities' er. Last week was Sunshine Week,which is meetings he finds them boring. an annual effort led by the American Soci- "It's an excuse for people to sit at home ety of News Editors to encourage a dialogue and complain," said Murphy. He'd prefer about the importance of open government residents attend council meetings instead. and freedom of information. There was no shortage of residents at � �, i The timing of Sunshine Week was fitting meetings in recent weeks. But the standing ��'��`� /` as dust was settling on�the ruckus sur- r�om �niy crowd represents only a tiny frac- rounding The Emily Program's tion of the people living in the application to move to Orono. In city. recent meetings, neighbors, �� z;gp�:.� � Murphy speculated that if the W,,r,,, council inembers and others � `�_� �� council took a vote on whether to gave impassioned speeches �� ; tape council meetings, the coun- �- � about whether the eating disor- ;� �, cIl would approve it. But not with der clinic should Ue allowed in '� '�� his support. the city. � "Taping isn't all that it's But unless you were there,you � � �� ;� cracked up to be," said Murphy. � �E�� won't be able to watch what hap- '�`""""` The obvious reason to support pened at those meetings. Unlike ��'-'='� �-��—�� taping of the meetings� is the the majority of cities around ��itor gieater transparency it offers. But Lake Minnetonka, Orono doesn't Murphy said transparency can be �E�� record its meetings so people can view hard to define and is typically used with them. Instead, the city audio records the thinly veiled innuendo. � meetings. To me, transparency is siinply making it Environmental It isn't because of a lack in resources that easy to see what's going on. While Orono Orono's meeting go unrecorded. does all it is legally required to do in terms Trust Func� The city is one of 17 that are members of of open meeting law and other require- To the Editor: the Lake Minnetonka Communications ments, it could do more to make it easier for Recently the Minnesota Commission (LMCCI. The LMCC offers its residents to understand city business and House of Representatives services, at no additional cost to cities, to why decisions are being made. passed the Legislative Citizen record council meetings and air them on Orono Council Member poug Franchot, Commission on Minnesota local cable stations as well as stream them who represents the city on the LMCC board, Resources project proposals. online. Of the 17 member cities, four of said the city already operates with plenty The projects are funded using them choose not to record their meetings. of transparency. Environmental Trust Fund In addition to Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Like Murphy, he said that he's worried dollars, and I am concerned Woodland and Loretto have opted to avoid taping the meetings would discourage resi- that the House bill does not the airwaves. dents from attending. While he said he's not spend these dedicated funds No one I spol�e with last week could tell against the city taping the meetings, he said in the way Minnesota resi- me wl�en or why Orono made the decision. he doesn't support it either. dents expect them to be used. "They've been given the opportunity to Both Franchot and Murphy said that they The Environinental Trust do that if they choose," said Sally Koenecke, haven't given the topic a great deal of Fund was established by a LMCC's executive director. "On an ongoing thought. Because reside�ts aren't complain- constitutional amendment in basis we let them know they have the ing about the untelevised meetings, they 1988 "far the public pur�+ose opportunity." don't see a need to bring it up. of protection, conservation, But the council members I spoke with So residents of Orono, are you interested preservation and enhance- last week don't seem interested in changing in seeing your council in action? If so, now ment of the state's air,water, the city's course. would be a good time to speak up and ask land,fish,wildlife and other "I understand transparency and all that for sunshine. nattu-al resources." I question whether projects � like digital photograpl�y class- �-�r--c�rF��:-�� . - - MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: L1N VEE, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: COMMENTS REGARDING INFORMATION UPDATES DATE: MARCH 22, 2010 Attached are the Information Update memos from March 12 and March 19 for reference if Council wishes to discuss any of these items. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: ORONO MANAGEMENT TEAM SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE DATE: MARCH 12, 2010 • Melanie, Mike and Tom Kellogg met with the CommonBond group on Thursday afternoon to discuss their upcoming proposal. CommonBond plans to have a representative attend the Comp Plan Open House (March 29) to be available for resident questions on that particular piece of property. They will be presenting their proposal to the Planning Commission at the April 19th meeting in a sketch plan format. They also plan to canvass the neighborhood with flyers beforehand. The City will publish notice to the properties within 350' of the site as well as a legal notice in the paper in order to have public input at this meeting. A formal application will be made and heard by the Planning Commission at the May 17th meeting. (MC) � Update regarding the sign in violation at North Shore Marina: Rather than making a variance application the owner has indicated that the sign will be brought into compliance and permitted. (MC) • Harvest Moon Coop's building permit application is in and should be ready to issue within the next week or so. (MC) • Planning staff and the Planning Commission have been working on changes to the CUP standards as well as a review of the current CUP uses within each zoning district for appropriateness and more up to date language/terminology. The public hearing on these amendments will be held at the April 19th Planning Commission meeting. (MC) • Planning Commissioners Tess Rice and Linda Feuss both have terms ending on March 31, 2010. They have both expressed an interest in reappointment. Unless directed otherwise, staff plans to prepare a memo reflecting reappointment for both Commissioners for your next meeting. (MC) • News from Correy: o One week till graduation. Looking forward to returning home and to work. The Ciry of Orono complies with the Minnesota Data Practices and Open Meeting Law. The recipients of this electronic file m•e asked not to "Forward"or "Reply to All"concerning information contained in this email. MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: ORONO MANAGEMENT TEAM SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE DATE: MARCH 19, 2010 • The Sewer Department was recently notified of a sewer issue at 2485 Dunwoody Avenue. In brief, the property has not been connected to the sewer system since last September. A tank has been placed at the residence to temporarily fix the problem. Staff is currently soliciting quotes to permanently correct the situation. The homeowner has been understanding and is working with the City on a solution. Tom Kellogg will be at the work session on Tuesday to explain what happened. • The joint meeting of the Orono and Long Lake City Councils has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m. as the first item on the Orono Council regular meeting agenda for April 12. Jim Grube of Hennepin County will make a presentation about the Highway 12 Turnback process, with time available for questions and discussion. • The Planning department sent out a notification email to 43+ advertisers of`Boat Slips far Rent" in Orono. The emails contained a notice that dock space rental in Orono violates our City Code. We are finding these ads on Craigslist, the classifieds and other local "realtor type"websites. (MC) • Planning & Building staff has recently been communicating with a woman who intends to open a salon at 3205 Shoreline Drive in Navarre. This is the same building where State Farm is located. All of the conversations with staff have been revolving around a"salon"however upon further research staff discovered that massa e therapy is one of the services provided. (Click on the link for the salon's website) The only provisions within the Zoning Code referencing"massage" are under 78-1 Definitions within the definition for Sports and health facility (which is not specifically permitted in any district) and under 78-1377 Sexually oriented businesses. Sexually oriented businesses or"Adult Uses" are permitted only within the Industrial district. Basically, staff will have to tell the applicant that the therapeutic massage portion of her salon is not allowed. In light of the plan to revise and modernize our Conditional Use regulations staff would like the Council to indicate their desire to have staff and Planning Commission pursue revising the Code to allow "therapeutic massage" as a conditional use in some commercial districts. Many cities regulate salons and massage parlors by business license. Please contact Melanie if you have specific thoughts on this matter. (MC) The Ciry of Orono complies with the Minnesota Data Practices and Open Meeting Law. The recipients of this electronic file are asked not to "Forwarc�"or "Reply to All"concerning information contained in this email. (FYI Definitions: 78-1 Definitions. Sports and health facility means a facility where members or nonmembers pay a fee to use equipment or space for the purpose of physical exercise or training. A sports and health facility may include aerobics, weight training, muscular exercise programs, yoga, Pilates, court games,jogging, or other similar activities. It may provide as an accessory use personal services to patrons, including but not limited to therapeutic massage, tanning, saunas, and whirlpools. 78-1377 Sexually oriented businesses. (b) definitions, specified adult business (13) Massage parlor means a massage parlor or health club which restricts minors by reason of age, and which provides the services of massage, if such service is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities.) • Draft agenda attached for March 23, 2010 Council Work Session. The City of Orono complies with the Minnesota Data Practices and Open Meeting Law. The recipients of this electronic file are asked not to "Forward"or "Reply to All"concerning information contained in this email. Orono City Council Committee of the Whole March 9, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers Present: Mayor Jim White, Council Members Cynthia Bremer, Lili McMillan and Jim Murphy; Assistant City Administrator for Long-Term Strategy Mike Gaffron, Finance Director Ron Olson, Planning &Zoning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, Public Works Supervisor pon DeBaere, Building Official Lyle Oman and City Clerk Lin Vee 1. Geo-thermal Presentation • Oman introduced Jim Cusak, an Orono resident who has installed geo-thermal furnaces for 13 years, and Hollis Linehan, Executive Vice President of MEP Associates, a company that specializes in renewable energy. • Oman explained the city facilities are 17 years old with 17-18 furnaces. The natural gas heating and air conditioning systems are getting to the end of reasonable use. Staff has been looking at options for system upgrades, include geo-thermal systems. • Geo-thermal has been in use for many years and is recognized as one of the best heating and cooling solutions available today, especially for using renewable energy. • The city's existing system would make an excellent conversion to geo-thermal as it would be a cost- effective installation and operating system. • An electric base system is used for heating and cooling along with a loop field (pipes) outside. • Geo-thermal systems are generally about 30% more efficient. The real benefit is the way it works by providing carbon reduction. • Basically the system moves heat from inside the building and puts it in the ground in the summer; and in the winter the system takes heat from the ground and puts it back into the building. • The contractors propose to do a feasibility study to understand how a new system would affect the building and economic situation. They design a model building in a computer simulation, including lights, occupancy, walls, etc. and analyze the existing utility bills. The existing system is then replaced with a geo-thermal system to use as a basis for estimating the energy savings. • Average payback for a changeover is about 8 years. • There is an additional cost to install the pipe/loop field in ground, which has a life expectancy of 100 years. When inside equipment needs to be replaced, the loop field wouldn't have to be replaced. Geo- thermal equipment has been outlasting other types of systems for up to 30 years.The loop field would be about the size of the building and could be insta►led under parking lots or in any green space (preferable). Once the loop field is installed, pavement can be repeatedly laid over the top of the loop field. • The system uses electricity. Electricity prices fluctuate much less than natural gas. • The system is designed for ground temperatures at 20-25 below zero. Supplemental heat is generally not required. Council had some concern that a back-up system may be needed. • Fans move the air, similar to existing equipment. A freezer/refrigerator removes heat from the unit, it doesn't make the food cold. Geo-thermal operates in a similar fashion. • Grants and stimulus funds are available for public facilities, but there are many applicants. There are also some monies available as a tax credit; since the city doesn't pay taxes it would be available as a 10% grant. • The cost for a feasibility study is approximately$3000. Xcel Energy would reimburse 50%of the cost after approved. • The Public Works building doesn't lend itself to geo-thermal because it has radiant heat. The contractors have some other suggestions for the Public Works building. • Oman has scheduled an energy audit with Xcel Energy. • Rough estimate of cost: $25 per square foot for new systems. In the city, some ductwork exists that could be used. Contractor would need to do further analysis including the costs for the loop field installation. Page 1 of 5 Orono City Council Committee of the Whole March 9, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers • If the system were abandoned, the pipes in the loop field would need to be filled, similar to wells. • The soil in this area is conducive to the geo-thermal system and generates high BTUs. 48 degrees is the common ground temperature. • Council directed staff to move forward with a feasibility study. 2. CommonBond Discussion � Gaffron reviewed the documents included in the packet outlining the CommonBond proposal. • The City Attorney is reviewing a draft purchase agreement. Council will need to determine how they want to make the city property available to CommonBond. Options include sale at fair market price, below market price, at no cost (donation), long-term lease similar to Orono Woods Senior housing, or some other method. White stated the city needs to get an appraisal and should consider a redevelopment agreement instead of a business subsidy. • Amanda Novak, representative from CommonBond, expressed her appreciation for the letters of support provided by the city. Their next major application for tax credits is due June 17`". They need some sort of site control as part of the application. It is a competitive application based on point criteria. Points could be acquired by items such as a land donation or reduction of fees. o If CommonBond is required to pay the full $600,000 in development fees,they would need to reduce the number of affordable units. • McMillan asked what percentage of occupants would be from Orono. Novak estimated 65-70%would be people who would move from outside Orono from communities such as Plymouth, Long Lake, Maple Plain, and Wayzata. • Murphy questioned how the public would become informed about the project. Gaffron responded that the Comp Plan public hearing will provide an opportunity for the public to discuss properties that are proposed to be reguided. Staff has committed to send notice to individual property owners whose property is affected, but could consider a larger area for notification. Reguiding doesn't guarantee this project would be approved and developed. • Rezoning follows Comp Plan approval by Met Council. The rezoning process involves a complete review process and notification of neighbors within a specific distance. • Gaffron noted there would be very few homes that would be affected by the CommonBond project. • McMillan expressed concern about the timing of the project. People are concerned about tax increases. They want to be able to stay in Orono and helping others to move into Orono may have a negative perception. People have very little patience for government and the city may get a backlash from the larger community in addition to the neighbors. • White stated they will need to provide information and justification to the public and show financial impacts. • Novak suggested they could distribute flyers to the neighborhood presenting the project concept. • Council agreed that CommonBond should submit an application that would follow the normal review process, including Planning Commission and Council meetings. • Novak stated an application could be submitted for the April Planning Commission meeting with Council review in May and asked if the city would want a purchase agreement before the rezoning occurs. White stated they could be worked on concurrently. • McMillan commented that the public will be asking if the city has been doing financial due diligence. CommonBond can provide an analysis. • The Planning Commission reviews parking, etc. but not necessarily bigger issues. • Council discussed experience of the Planning Commissioners, especially in relation to larger development applications, and how Council could be involved. • Curtis suggested that Novak attend the Comp Plan public hearing to answer questions about the CommonBond proposal for the property that is being reguided by the fire station. Page 2 of 5 Orono City Council Committee of the Whole March 9, 2010,6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers • Gaffron stated that it will take about a week to get the Comp Plan to the Met Council following the public hearing and Met Council probably won't act on it until May. CommonBond is about a month ahead of where they should be in relation to the city's Comp Plan process. • Council agreed that the CommonBond concept stage will take more than one Planning Commission and Council meeting and the applicant should submit their application and allow the Planning Commission to do as much as they can in one meeting to move the process forward. • Gaffron expressed concern about the city's commitment to project. Both the applicant and staff need direction about the city property before additional money is expended without Council support. • McMillan questioned if the Council would move forward if grant deadlines were not an issue and expressed concern about the timing given the city's workload in the next 3-6 months. • Curtis noted that the City Attorney is a good partner in the team and will be very helpful. This is a typical application and will follow the normal process. She suggested a meeting with Kellogg, Gaffron, Novak, architects and herself on Thursday afternoon to discuss further details. • White stated he would discuss a redevelopment agreement with the City Attorney. • Murphy stated the Council's task is to determine if they want to move forward. White, Bremer and Murphy were in favor of moving forward. McMillan had reservations about the timing of the project. • Council will need to collectively determine how to handle transfer of the city property. Olson commented that if the land is sold, the money goes to the general fund; and fees go to stormwater or sewer funds, etc. • Curtis distributed a brochure that Evelyn Turner put together entitled "Thinking of Buying a Lakeshore Property in Orono?" 3. Emily Program Follow-up • The City Attorney will not be available for the April 12 Council meeting. • Curtis reviewed the direction staff will follow based on the Council meeting. o Additional information will be obtained regarding traffic, parking, intensification of use, lighting, hours of operation and what programs are operating out of the first floor. o The City Attorney will review how the use fits into the definition of hospital and provide interim use permit information. o One or two council members, the City Attorney and staff will meet to discuss prior to the next Council meeting. • Murphy commented that the Peterson letter was well written. The process has been good and narrowed down to a land use issue—either it fits or it doesn't. • Code language should be reviewed and revised in the near future. The definition of a hospital from the 1968 code is a good example of how definitions can change over time. • The data practices request was discussed. A copy of everything provided to the requestor should be kept on file at City Hall. In addition, a complete set should be copied to the City Attorney and Mayor. 4. Zoning Prosecution Services • Olson reviewed the change in zoning prosecution services suggested by Curtis last year. • The City Attorney, Soren Mattick, is much more familiar with zoning issues than Ken Potts, even though his hourly rate is higher. • Council approved using the City Attorney, Soren Mattick, for zoning prosecution services. • McMillan asked if there is any impact on the contract with Ken Potts. Olson confirmed there is no impact. 5. Comp Plan Discussion Page 3 of 5 Orono City Council Committee of the Whole March 9, 2010,6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers • Gaffron discussed optional dates for the Comp Plan hearing, which will be scheduled for Monday, March 29th since it was the best day for the majority of Council and Planning Commission Members. • Although there is no obligation to notify individual property owners of the Comp Plan public hearing, Council determined that property owners within 350'of any property that is affected by the proposed Comp Plan changes should be notified. 350' is consistent with the notification requirement of other zoning applications. • White also suggested a newspaper article and will contact a reporter. • Gaffron noted that Kyle Colvin was receptive to the numbers proposed in the recent letter to Met Council regarding the Long Lake sewer interceptor. 6. MCWD Rules Update • Mayor White and Gaffron attended a meeting regarding the proposed MCWD rule changes and were pleased with the MCWD response to comments submitted by lake area cities. The MCWD seems to be heading down a path that Orono can support. • The Mayor of Mound has organized a meeting for Wednesday regarding the MCWD rules. No representatives from Orono are planning to attend. 7. Joint Orono/Long Lake Council Meeting • Long lake is proposing a joint meeting at the March 22"d Orono council meeting. Council suggested the first Council meeting in April. Gaffron will confirm. • Gaffron asked for Council input regarding the consultant engineering services for the TH 12 Turnback project. Council had no objection to including the engineer for either Orono (Bonestroo) or Long Lake (SEH) in the RFP process. 8. Police Matters • The letter sent to Long Lake regarding police service was discussed. 9. Miscellaneous • Metro Landscape Restoration and Clean Water Grant o Olson explained that a grant is available through Hennepin County for landscape restoration and clean water. Don DeBaere and Tom Kellogg have been working on a grant application for the March 8 deadline and have identified two project areas that could benefit from grant funds. The grant requires a match of up to $25,000. Submittal of the grant application technically requires Council authorization. Council approved submittal of the grant application. • Election Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities (EAID) Grant o Vee stated that last fall Council authorized submittal of a grant application for automatic door openers for the Council Chambers and City Hall entrances as part of the Election Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Grant program to be used for polling place improvements. No metro cities were awarded grant funds. o A second round of EAID grant funds has been made available with a March 19 application deadline. Staff has submitted a second application for the same program. • Natural Shore Technologies, Inc. Workshop Proposal o Vee explained that Natural Shore Technologies has approached the city with an offer to hold a workshop about the benefits of native plants and native landscaping. The workshop includes a 90 minute presentation with 30 minutes for plant sales and would be held in the Council Chambers. Information could be included in the Spring newsletter. Page 4 of 5 Orono City Council Committee of the Whole March 9, 2010, 6:30 p.m. Orono City Council Chambers o Council was in favor of proceeding with the workshop. • MCWD Long Lake Creek Restoration Project o Gaffron met with the Watershed District about a project they want to do that involves some stream bank restoration. Their plan is to do a feasibility study this year and design work next year. Council was in support of the feasibility study, but directed staff to monitor the design plans as they proceed. • Gaffron distributed a letter from Three Rivers Park District about a proposal to allow electric bikes on regional trails. Council comments should be directed to Gaffron. 10. Comments Regarding Information Updates • None Page 5 of 5