HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-13-2009 Council Work Session Packet Council Work Session
6:15 p.m., Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Orono City Council Chambers
AGENDA
1. Ken Potts— Contract Services and Rates (6:15-6:45)
2. RideNet (6:45-7:00) �
3. Fee Schedule Review (7:00-7:15)
4. Stormwater Plan Update—Authorize Commencemept of Work (7:15-7:30)
5. Process for Visioning and Goal Setting (7:30-8:15)
Previous Work Session Topics
December 9—Minutes Attached
o ID Badges for Council Members
o Request for Trapping Permit
o Michael Kuruvilla— 850 Wayzata Blvd W �
o Gillespie Center Discussion
o Casco Point Reconstruction Project
- Preparation for Neighborhood Meeting
- Funding and Final Design Specifics
o Annual Appointments
November 25
o Long Lake Fire Department Update
o Senior Housing at 875 Wayzata Boulevard West
o Attorney Contract
o Xcel Franchise Agreement
o Engineer Contract
o Casco Point Feasibility Report
o TNT Preparation by Finance
o Review of Citizen Survey
o Finalize Work Session Dates for 2009
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR WHITE AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
MANAGEMENT TEr1M
FROM: LIN VEE, CIT'Y CLERK
SUBJECT: KEN POTTS—CONTRACT SERVICES AND RATES
DATE: J�NUARY 12, 2009
Ken Potts, Prosecuting Attorney, will attend the January 13`" work session to review his services and
rates. r,ttached is a copy of the current Agreements with Mr. Potts.
I �
KENNETH N. POTTS, P.A. 5101 Thimsen Avenue
Attorney at Law Suite 200
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345
TELEPHONE(952)474-4240
TELECOPIER(952)474-0987
LETTER OF AGREEMENT
To the Orono City Council,
As a duly licensed attorney to practice law in the State of Minnesota, I agree to perform
all the duties out lined in the attached Prosecuting Attorney Position Description for the
City of Orono upon appointment b;�the City Cauncil.
Further I agree to the following:
Term of Employment. The City employs Prosecutor as an attorney for a term beginning J
January l, 2007 ending on December 31, 2009 unless terminated under the termination
paragraph.
Termination. This Agreement shall terminate as follows:
a) By mutual agreement of the parties.
b) Upon the death of the prosecutor.
c) The City may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice after
which the City shall have no further liability to the prosecutor.
d) In addition, the City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement
immediately upon the occurrence of any one of the following events:
1) The revocation or suspension of Prosecutor's license to
practice law in the State of Minnesota.
2) The conviction of Prosecutor of any crime punishable as a felony
involving moral turpitude or immoral conduct.
Compensation. The City shall pay to the Prosecutor as compensation for his services
$31,500.00 per year. Said fee paid by the City encompasses the entire amount owed,
except for expenses such as subpoena fees, filing fees and transcript fees. The City shall
pay prosecutor one twelfth of said annual amount each month upon receipt of invoice.
Orono City Council
Page 2
Entire AQreement; Modifications; Waiver. This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained in it and
supercedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and under-
standings of all parties. No supplement, modifications or amendment of this Agreement
shall be deemed, or shall constitute, waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar,
nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless
executed in writing by the party making the waiver.
Sincerely,
��?
� J
� �
/���- �G6
Kenneth N. Potts, P.A. Date
i�
_
KENNETH N. POTTS, P.A. 5101 Thimsen Avenue
Attorney at Law Suite 200
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345
TELEPHONE(952)474-4240
TELECOPIER(952)474-0987
LETTER OF AGREEMENT IN REGARD TO FORFEITURES
To the Orono City Council,
The Council has determined that it is in the best interests of it's citizens that vehicles
being driven by multiple DWI offenders be forfeited to the City.
I agree to pursue forfeiture actions as set forth in Minn. Stat. §169A.63. This would
include the following services:
a) Filing the Summons and Complaint.
b) Bringing the appropriate motions.
c) Trying the case to the Court.
d) Filing all appellate pleadings, if necessary.
e) Obtaining appropriate title so the vehicle can be sold or maintained as set
forth in the statute.
Compensation. The City shall pay attorney Kenneth N. Potts $70.00 per hour plus
expenses, if any, to represent it in these forfeiture actions.
Te:m of E:r.plo��nent. The City em��loys Kenneth N. Potts as the attorney to represent it
in these forfeiture actions beginning January 1, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2009.
Termination. Should the City discover that the costs of pursuing these forfeiture actions
outweigh the benefits the City may terminate this agreement immediately.
Sincerely,
�
� ,-� �������-�
Kenneth N. Potts, P.A. Date
�
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR WHITE r�ND COUNCIL MEMBERS
MANAGEMENT TEr�M
FROM: WILLIAM WF.LLS, CITY�DMINISTRr�TOR
SUBJECT: RIDE-NET
DATE: JANUARY 12, 2009
A representative fxom RideNet will attend the January 13`h work session to share information about
the RideNet program. Attached is a copy of the brochure that was provided to the City.
�:. � _ � . . .. �:n sa,'- �
NEED PRCJVIDE
-�� A RIDE? � A RIDE !
�
�
One call gets you there! One call and you can help!
8�0-4 5 O�6 7 0� Now you can help local members of your com-
munity�et a ride.Throu�h CT RideNet you can
Ci-� . become a local ambassador, certified volunteer
R � driver, an advisor or a community partner. We
i d e N et have driving opportunities for:
With just one call or click,CT RideNet can con-
• Volunteer • Professional
nect you with a ride in your area for medical • Scheduled • Part-time
appointments, shoppinQ, work and more. Our • On Call • Full-time
multilingual, live operators are available 24/7 •your vehicle •
Our vehicle
to provide information about all transportation
options in your area includina public, private, Call or visit our website for more details.
and volunteer services. TTY service available. 800-450-61 00
www.CTRideNet.com
• Bus •Public
•Taxi • Private
•Accessible Van •Aaency ��
•Automobile •Volunteer R ' d e N e t
WWW.CTRid@N@t.0011'1 6��r-kin; T��oetllPr- to Get Yoz� There
� . � , . � . . �. � � � , � � � �� � . •
.
NEED CT RideNet is an easy to use �vay for you
, A R��E� to access free information on all available
� transportation options in your area. Just call
R i d e N et g00-450-6100 to get or give help.
800���0��+ � OO MultilineualandTTY ��'
0 service available. R�d e N et
v'.�'.:'':� r'�ie✓ .� n���+..�u..�3-a�a�:�.�.w�d.d���j
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr1YOR WHITE AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
MANAGEMENT TEAM
FROM: LIN VEE, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: FEE SCHEDUI.F REVIEW
DATE: JANUARY 12, 2009
rlttached is a copy of the Council Action memo from the December 8, 2008 Council meeting which
identifies the proposed changes and increases to the 2009 Fee Schedule. Staff will be available to
answer questions regaxding the proposed changes.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: November 19, 2008
ITEM NO:
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Lin Vee City Administrator's
Title City Clerk Repart
Item Description: Proposed 2009 Fee Schedule
Attachment: A. Summary Ordinance
B. Proposed 2009 Fee Schedule Ordinance
The proposed 2009 Fee Schedule Ordinance and Summary reflecting the proposed changes are attached.
The proposed changes include:
• Increase in contractual inspection service monthly retainer fee and inspection charge.
• Increase of SAC charge. Fee is set by the MCES, but collected by the City and
forwarded to the MCES.
• Increase of approximately 4.0% in all water connection charges.
• Increase of approximately 4.0% in all sanitary sewer connection charges prior to 1997
and 6.0%— 8.0% after 1997.
• Increase of approximately 4.0% for storm water and drainage trunk fees.
• 3.0% increase in sewer rates and 3.0% increase in water rates.
• 3.0% increase in storm water utility rates.
• 5% increase in recycling charge per year.
• Increase permit fees for Plumbing, Mechanical, Demolition, Septic, Sewer Connection
and Water Connection permits.
• Increase Annual Service Charge for the On-Site Septic System Program.
• Increase postage and handling fee.
• Increase kennel, dog, garbage hauler and tobacco license fees.
• Increase Police Special Services (Officer 119 Rate).
• Planning and Zoning fee increases as follows:
o $100 increase in application fees for subdivisions, variances and conditional use
permits.
o Incorporation of the filing fees into the fee for a Final Plat application
o Increase of$25 per acre for planned developments.
o Increase of$100 for PUD rezoning in Hwy 12 corridor.
o Addition of a$2,500 escrow for subdivisions with no public improvements.
o Increase of the fee for public road and easement vacations.
o $100 increase in the fee to create an easement outside the subdivision process.
• Water meter costs are not available for 2009 and will be updated when available.
• Golf course charges will be reviewed in the spring. Fee changes will be adopted by
resolution at that time.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt the attached ordinance adopting the City's Fee Schedule for 2009 and Summary
Ordinance for publication.
ORDINANCE NUMBER ,THIRD SERIES
SUMMARY APPROVED
The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this oxdinance marked "Official
Summary of Ordinance Number ,ThiYd Series," and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs
the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that the publication of
the title and such summary will clearly inform the puUlic of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER ,THIRD SERIES
ORDINANCE NO. ,THIRD SERIES
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2009 FEE SCHEDULE
AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 40,THIRD SERIES
The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number , Third Series approved by tl�e Ciry
Council of the City of Orono on December 8, 3008.
The followin sections have chan es, additions and/or deletions:
DESCRIPTION 2008 FEE 2009 FEE
ZONING APPLICATIONS
VARIANCE
13ase Fcc �6�}+�E1 700.00
Renewal�'aiiance �9A 350.00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Residential�ccessoi�- Use �Ei99-99 700.00
Institutional Usc �Fi99-99 700.00
Duplex Cxedit �Fi9A-99 700.00
Guest House/Guest.�partment �i99-99 700.00
Commerical/Industrial Use �Fi99:99 700.00
Non-Conforming Use �Fi99:99 �700.00
Land�lteration:
-Grading&filling-designated wedand �H99:99 700.00
-Grading,fillixig,etc. (over 500 cubic yards) �Fi9g:98 �700.00
-Sea walls,xetaining walls 0-75'lakeshore �Fi90:98 700.00
_lpplication Escrow(any of above) �H99:98 700.00
_lmend Eaisting CUP �i99:99 700.00
Renewal Condiuonal Use Pexmit �5�99 350.00
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PID_�pplications �A8 200.00
�68�99} (minimum$1.000.00�
PUD Rezoning(Hw�� 12 Corridor Only)
Residential . $700.00 per dwelling unit
Commercial/Industrial �1-�99-ger�c�e $200.00�er acres
�68�5:99} (muumum$1,000.00�
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
;�pplication Escrow �9&89 700.00
ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING �98 700.00
REZONING
REQUEST TO AMEND �H99.�9 700.00
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SUBDIVISION
Basic Subdivision Applicarion �i99-98 700.00
Pxeliminary Plat Review �59-99 850.00
Final Plat Review $�59:89 600.00
ees�s
g.� eas�s J
Renewal of Subdivision_� xoval ��99 350.00
Page 1 of 6
DESCRIPTION 2008 FEE 2009 FEE
:�pplicauon Escxow e,n nnn nn...:._:.�..._. $2,500.00-no public improaements
$10,000.00 minimum witli�ublic
im�rovements
VACATIONS $100.00 per benefiting�ro�ert�
Public Road . $700.00 minimum per a�plication
. 200.00
Easement�'acations w/Subdivision�lpplications ��8 700.00
Easement�'acauons not�ssociated with �98
Subdivision 1lpplicauons
EASEMENT CREATION 700.00
Easement Cxeation not_�ssociated with �699-99
Subdivision,� lication
STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK
FEES
New Development Land Use � 2 660
Single Famil}-Residential 5,�cxe Zone � 3 330
Single Family Residential 2_�cxe Zone � 4 330
Single Familp Residential 1 .1cre Zone 4-509 4 990
Single Famil}�Residential'/z.�cre Zone � 6 000
�fulri Tamil}�Residenrial 4 Units/A�rc��r l�ss -�7-3 7 000
Commeicial or Industrial � 7 990
Area of Impervious Surface Expansion Residential Redevelopment Commercial or Industrial
Redevelopment
2008 2009 2008 2009
0-100 Square Fee �� 1 170 �-�Fi9(� 2 800
1000-2000 Squaxe Fect �-?�9 2 330 �5,-�5 5 590
\lorc ihan 2U0(1 Squarc I�cct �u 3 330 �9� 8 000
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES
DEMOLITION PERMIT
Principal Structure ��9.89 75.00
��ccessory Structure (39:99} 50.00
PLUMBING PERMIT
�liiiimum Fee • $50.00 minunum�er project
�tail-in postage&handling charge {�1�8) 2.00
MECHANICAL PERMIT
Residential
�Iinimum Tee • $50.00 minimum�cr project
\Iail-in postage&handling charge �0} 2.00
Commercial, Industrial& Multi-Family
�Iinimum Fee �� 50.00
MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT
Scwer �� 50.00
SAC (Sewer.�vailabilin�Charge)-Determined �� 2 000.00
by�iCES
Water �g 50.00
�Iail-in osta e&handlin char e �g 2.00
Page 2 of 6
DESCRIPTION 2008 FEE 2009 FEE
ON-SITE SYSTEMS
Residenrial System Pexmit 100.00
Repair e�sting system �59:99
New/Replacement System �gg_gg 200.00
Non-Residenrial System Pexmit
New ox Total xeplacement $100.00 200.00
����
rlmival Ser�rice Charge ���.��T�� ��5.00/system/��ear
CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE
tilonthly Retainer Fee �99-per�err�k $30.00 pex month
Ins cction Charrc Q��nn„,...:„.�, _«:�� � �
p �, -���.������_ $30.00 per tnspection
LICENSES&MISCELLANEOUS CI-IARGES
GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE
-rlar iate c�`��-r'�r', 75.00
General Administrative Licenses/Fines
Tobacco Licenses �1-99:AA 125.00
General Administrative Documents
lfail-in Postage and Handling Chargc �-59 2.00
DOG LICENSES
Biannual License ��5-99 20.00
.�nnual License �9 10.00
�1ai1-in Postage and Handling Chax�e 2.00
KENNEL LICENSES
Residential,-lpplication&Inspection Fee �99 30.00
DOGS AT LARGE—RELEASE FEE
First Offensc �99 60.00
Second Offense �98 80.00
Third Offense �,z5-99 100.00
POLICE SPECIAL SERVICES (Officer 119 �-�r.99 80.00
Rate)
Page 3 of 6
�
SEWER PROJECTS Unit Charge + Area o�Acre Ch�e Credit to Area
2008 2009
By District- Project
1��3 sr-i��,Ls-1.�,si�-1s,Ls-1� �e:ee ��oo.00 �1�
1964 LS-1A ox LS-1B �Er,44�99 6 700.00 (1)
1965 LS-1 �Fr4�49:89 6 700.00 (1�
1��5 r.s-i_� �e:ee ��oo.00 �i�
1967 LS-1 �i;44&99 6 700.00 (1)
1969 LS-1 Shore Hills �9�5-99 �16 720.00 (1�
1969 LS-2 ChevS�Chase �''',�� 13 070.00 (1�
¢�� �i�nn
1970 LS-1 Saga Hill �� 13 070.00 (1)
ei� �i�nn
1971 LS-1 Dunwood�� �w 13.070.00 (1�
1973-1 �;8�-5:98 $16 720.00 (1)
s�2��n nn
1980-1 �finnetonka Bluffs � 14,510.00 (1�
1980-1 West Ferndale/County Road 15 �3�.?49&99 33 700.00 (1�
1980-1 Orono Lane � '�,�. .� �26 970.00 (1�
1980-1 Count��Road 15/�farinas �99 11 290.00 (1�
1980-2 North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine Ln �;499:99 �33.700.00 (1�
1981-1 North Shore Drive/Highwood �99 �17.350.00 (1�
1982-1A Navarre Utilities �99 3 690.00 Trunk.�rea�4�9:99 1 508.00 (1)
1982-1B Navarre Utilities Northern��ve �-99 600.00 �$�5-99$3.990.00 Per rlcre (1)
1985-1 Crystal Bay ��&99 $17,540.00 (1)
1983-1 Highway 12 Orono-Long Lake-lfedina �� 1 730.00 (1�
1989 Highway 12 �98 6 330.00/acre (1)
1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer
I Stubbs Bay NE/NW-BaS�side East ��98:99 19 750.00 (1�
II Bederwood �49�99 30 580.00 (1�
III Bayside North �4;99�98 25 900.00 (1)
I�'Oxford �98 36 550.00 (1�
�"Cygnet and Leaf �49�98 29 540.00 (1�
1997 Sewer
97-1 North L.L./L.L.C.C. �4T���o $26,280.00 (��
97-2 Bracketts Point �99 $43,7G0.00 (��
97-3 Ba��Ridge ��',�� �23 360.00 (��
1998-1999 Sewer
1998 Shoreline/Heiirage �9;�5-99 �22,440.00 ���
99-1 Orono Oxchard �3?�i.� $29 570.00 (��
99-2 Edgewood Hills �9�99 �37 570.00 (��
2000 Sewer (g�
2000-1 Webber Hills �9�9:99 9 580.00 (g�
2000-2 Fox Ridge �9;99�99 $21 140.00 (g�
2000-3 East Long Lake �`�,59�99 �16.790.00
2000 Little Orchard Wav �e To be
df��ed-E�y determined
2003 Sewer � �Engineex (1)
2003-1 North Long Lake East �;���.99 �12925.00 (1�
2003-2 Old Long Lake Rd �1-8�99 7 630.00 �1�
2003-3 Sixth.1ve N/Brown Rd (Phillips) �n9;39�99 9 990.00
Page 4 of 6
SEWER PROJECTS Unit Charge + A��or A.4ce C��c Credit to Area
2008 2009
2004 Se«•er
2004 North Long Lake East�;xtension ��-1�8:99 12 210.00 (1)
2004 West Farm/Homestead �Er,S�39:99 7 320.00
(1)
2005 Sewer (1)
2005-1 Webber Hills/S Bxown Rd Est Q1.,�99 11 100.00
2005-2 Dickey Lake Dr N Q''',��z��.� 13 320.00 (1)
2006 Sewer
2006-1]amestown Road �A;44�99 $11.100.00 (1)
2007 Sewer
2007 Farview Lane Sewer �$8a99 8 370.00 (1)
1984 Forcemain and Lift Station#7 #6 By Pass + #7 Forcemain Credit to Area
Existing Propexties/Increasc �99 680.00 (4)
New Bldgs Replacing Existing Bldgs �-99 680.00 (4)
New Residenual w/Eaisung Stub �1>�99 1 940.00 (4)
New Residenrial without Stub ��8�.��}�610.00 �11 �-SFr5:s9$1 940.00 (� (1) and(4)
Fxeshwater Biological pn�l. A�1ar,1,��r�.nFry�ec�c l.��i,) �99�}�'610.00 (�. �39:9E3$760.00 (4) (1) and(4)
1989 Graviry Line and Lift Station Fixed Charge + #10 By Pass Credit to Area
(see map fox affected areas) �39-99 240.00 �;-28�-09 3 420.00 (1)
WATER PROJECTS Unit Charge + Area/Acreage Front Foot Credit to Area
By District- Pcoject
1)67 L��-1 I Iigh��-a� 12/Ci-�-stal Ba�-Road ��A 5 710.00 �-}A-=� -12.-�Q (1)
1969 LW-2 Chevy chase �499:99 5 710.00 (1)
1970 LW-1 Navarre Residential �2�5-99 2 820.00 -�4 28.25 (1)
1970 LW-1 Na��arre Commercial �4;9�r99 4 240.00 �49-�� 42.50 (1)
1982-1.�Navarro �89 3 020.00 (1)
1989 Highway 12 �9;9�5�$10.480.00/acre (1)
1999 Naearre��later Treatment Plant Rehabilitation �4�9:99 470.00 (1)
Page 5 of 6
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
MUNICIPAL SEWER RATES bv unit: 2008 Fee 2009 Fee
1st @'�`' ^2 i��-����-'�- 105.50 per quartex
2nd �n''������..��'�� 95.45 per quaxter
by flow: � � Qi/�nnn V,.n..� i i..,. 398/1000 gallon plus
@ n'���-�..�-`�-��- 9.94 per quarter per
c�erz connection
MUNICIPAL WATER RATES
Navarre��rea (_�rea#1)
Billing&Read��to Serve Chg � ''n•� 30.11/qtx
Water Usage Rate �r ���i�nnn�.� 2.54/1000 gal
Unconnected Pxopext��Chg ��t-� 30.11/qtr
Highwa�� 12_lrea(��rea#2)
Billing&Readj�to Serve Chg .�9 10.92 tr
Water Usage Rate �-�44�999-� $3.54/1000 gal
Chevy Chase.�rea (��rea#3)
Billing&Ready to Serve Chg �'�•� 10.92 tr
Water Usage Rate � '' ��%� $2.64/1000 gal
Bulk sale to�Linnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge�1xea _'-�� -++, u,..,. m� n�i,nnn v..n,_._ Area#1 Rate-$2.54/1000
ag llon
Charge for Unpaid Accounts Certified for �
Assessment
25.75
Water Turn-On �
Water Tuxn-0ff �.g 25.75
25.75
MUNICIPAL STORM WATER UTILITY RATES
One Residenual Unit
�.�8-99-�t�a�e�
RECYCLING CHARGE 10.30 per quartex
�
25.00 ear
� printed copy of the 2009 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the
office of the City Clerk during regular office hours.
This ordinance becomes effective the week of January 1,2009.
rldopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 8th day of December, 2008, by a vote of
ayes and nays.
AT"I'EST:
Linda S.Vee, City Clerk James M. White, Mayor
�
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
MUNICIPAL SEWER RATES b� unir. 2008 Fee 2009 Fee
1st Q'�'' ^� ��-�--�-��- �105.50 per quarter
2nd ���� 95.45 per quarter
by flo�v: � �gi/�nnn V,.n..� ��..� 398/1000 gallon plus
9.94 per quarter per
c�et� connection
MUNICIPAL WATER RATES
Navarre_lrea(l�xea#1)
Billing&Ready to Seive Chg �� 30.11/qtx
Water Usage Rate @ ���/�nnn V..� 2.54/1000 gal
Unconnected Propert��Chg �� 30.11/qtr
Highway 12_�xea (_�rea#2)
Billuig&Read��to Sen�e Chg 9.-�� 10.92 tr
Watex Usage Rate Q���^n"���� � 3.54/1000 gal
Chev�-Chase.-�rea(�1rea#3)
Billing&Ready to Serve Chg ¢'n•� 1092 tx
��/ater Usage Rate Q '' ����-�,-'�� $ 2.64/1000 gal
Bulk sale to�limietonka I3each for Lafayette Ridge.1rea '-�� �' D�`� ��n�/�nnn o..n�_ 11rea#1 Rate-�2.54/1000
a,g llon
Charge for Unpaid Accounts Certified for
Assessment � 25.75
��/ater'Iurn-On � 2S�S
Watex Turn-Off �5,gg �25.75
MUNICIPAL STORM WATER UTILITY RATES
One Residential Unit
10.30 pex quaxter
RECYCLING CHARGE
��� 25.00 �ear
r1 printed copj� of the 2009 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the
office of the City Clerk during regular office hours.
This ordinance becomes effective the week of January 1,2009.
r�dopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 8th day of December, 2008, bj� a vote of
ayes and nays.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk James M. White, Mayor
. �
�
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
Bill Wells, City Administrator
Ton Kellogg, City Engineer
From: Mike Gaffron, Asst. City Admin. - Long Term Strategy ��:�������
Date: January 12, 2009
Subject: Surface Water Management Plan Update - Authorization to Commence
(For January 13 Work Session - Formal Action January 26)
List of Attachments �
A - Bonestroo Proposal Dated 1-8-09
B - Excerpts from Met Counci12030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan: Pp. 83-87
C - MCWD Mandate & Checklists
SWMP Update Required. The Orono Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) was
completed in 2001 by Bonestroo & Associates and received formal Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District approval in 2002. There are a number of regulatory changes that have occurred since
2002 that we are required by statute to address, as well as mandates from Metropolitan Council
as described in their 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan (see excerpts, pp. 83-87
from that document). A significant change since 2002 is the requirement to meet specified levels
of phosphorus reduction.
Because the level of expertise required to address these changes is beyond that available in-
house, the attached proposal to update the SWMP was requested of Bonestroo & Associates. The
intent is to bring the SWMP into compliance in a timeframe commensurate with completion of
the Comp Plan.
Scope. This proposal has received a significant level of scrutiny by staff to ensure that the
required mandates are addressed without excessive expenditures. For instance, we have had two
meetings with Bob Barth of Bonestroo regarding the specific elements to be updated, and have
met with MCWD staff to clarify the level of detail and range of options for meeting our
phosphorus reduction requirements.
The attached proposal has been reduced in scope and cost from an earlier version received in
December 2008, eliminating review of the CSPP (Sewer Plan) Chapter which staff believes is
unnecessary. The proposal also converts the Phosphorus Reduction Plan work to an hourly rate
which provides some flexibility in the collaboration between staff, City Engineer and MCWD in
�he iterative process needed to devise an acceptable plan. Further, the creation of a Design Guide
providing detail for developers planning to work in the City has been separately priced as an
option, with two levels of detail (see page 4 of proposal). Staff believes that either the Level 1 or
Level 2 Design Guide would be very valuable in providing the justification that developers have
begun to demand relative to stormwater management requirements and fees given the current
economic climate; however, the creation of the Design Guide is not as time-critical as the SWMP
update.
i
SWMP Update
January 9,2009
Page 2
Funding. Base cost of the SWMP update is $18,900, with additional time as needed at standard
Bonestroo hourly rates for work on the Phosphorus Reduction Plan. The Level 1 or Level 2 �
Design Guidelines would be an additional $2,500 or $3,600 respectively should Council choose
to add that to the mix.
This mandatory update will be funded from the Stormwater Fund, which currently is at a level of
approximately $727,000. The Stormwater fund has two input components: the quarterly
Stormwater Utility Fees which generate approximately $120,000 per year; and the Stormwater &
Drainage Trunk Fees paid by new development, which generates variable amounts from year to
year depending on the level of development activity. For example, development of Stonebay
Outlot A will generate approximately $25,000 in SW&D Trunk Fees. Note that expenditures
from the Stormwater Fund have been minimal to date, and we have not made much progress
toward implementing projects in the 5-year Stormwater CIP that was established in 2002. As
part of the update, the Stormwater CIP will be revisited.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Staff requests Council authorization at the January 13 work session for Bonestroo to proceed
immediately with work on the SWMP update and Phosphorus Reduction Plan, with formal
action at your January 26 meeting.
Additionally, Council should provide direction as to whether a Design Guide should be prepared
at this time.
� �
2335 Highway 36 W
5t.Paul,MN 55113
� Te1651-636•46Q0
Fax651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
lanuary 8, 2009 �Bonestroo
Mike Gaffron
Assistant City Administrator for Long Term Strategy
City of Orono
P.O. Box b6
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Re: Proposal for Surface Water Management Plan
Dear Mike,
Bonestroo is providing you with a proposed scope of services and cost for the following:
1. Update Orono's 2002 Surface Water Management Plan
2. Prepare a summary of the Surface Water Management Plan for the Environmentai
ManagementlProtection Plan within Orono's Comprehensive Plan
3. Prepare a Phosphorus Reduction Plan that meets Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
requirements.
Scope of Services
Surface Water Management Plan
Task 1: Project Initiation and Management
We will rely on existing sources of data to prepare the SWMP, These existing data include USGS maps,
aerial phatographs, antl other Department of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Council or Watershed
Management Organization mapping resources, We propose one meeting with staff since our praposed
schedule calls for rather quick delivery of a draft report for staff review, Periodic check in with staff wilf
occur through phone calls and email. We have allocated time for a brief presentation to City Council.
Task 2: Assessment
The SWMP assessment section will identify locai and regional water resource issues and potential corrective
actians that could involve Orono. The assessment section will focus on TMDL or water quality assessments
ongaing or planned including Minnehaha Creek's Phosphorus Load Reduction requirement and the 230
pounds of phosphorus reduction determined for Orono. Issues and potential corrective actions will be
identified based on input from Orono staff, the 2002 SWMP, and MCWD sources. Items fram the 2002
SWMP table 7,18 will be revisited as ta whether the assessment of these items as current problems is still
valid. Any gaps or discrepencies in regulatory controls will be identified within this section, This wil!be a
new section for the Orona SWMP.
� City of Orono poge 2
Surface Water Manogement Plan ,Iranuary 8,2W9
Task 3: Update Sections of the 2002 SWMP
Task 3 involves significant update to sectians of the 2002 SWMP based upon regulatory changes that have
occurred since 2002 and based upon guidance from Metropolitan Council in their 2030 Water Resources -
Management Policy Plan. These updates are described as follows:
• An Executive Summary of Orono's updated SWMP will be provided as required by statute and
Metropolitan CounciL
• The 2002 SWMP Introduction will be rewritten to reflect current regulation regarding local surface
water management plans, The introduction will be augmented by describing the specific purpose
of Orono's updated SWMP.
• The Physical Environment section will be updated to reflect new information regarding water
resources within Orono and water resources to which Orono discharges.
� The Goals and Policies Section of Orono's SWMP will be updated to reflect back on priorities
identified within the assessmerit and to set the stage for the prioritized impiementation program,
• The System Description and Technical Backgraund sections wil!be left largely intact but will
updated to complement updates to other sections of the SWMP and ta better reflect current, _
accepted water resources management practices.
• The Wetland Management Section will be updated to reflect results from MCWD's own wetland -
inventory and to reflect any changed regulation regarding wetland management.
• The Implementation section of the Z00� SWMP will be significantly updated to inciude new
implementation priorities for capital projects, implementatian af new regulatory controls such as
ordinance updates, and SWPPP implementation such as public and staff education, inspection, an�
public works practices. 7he updated Implementation Section will prioritize implementatian items
in the form of an implementation program and will consider the financial implications of these
implementation items.
• A section on Amendment Procedures and Plan Administration will also be provided. -
• An appendix or report discussion will be added to reflect current water resource management
agreements to which Orono is a party.
Task 4; Revise Comprehensive Plan Chapter
When the tasks described above are substantially camplete,we will update the Environmental
ManagemenUProtection Plan within Orono`s Camprehensive Plan. We anticipate approximately 10 to 20
pages af revisians ta update this chapter according to the content of the SWMP.
Task 5; Report Production, Review and Approval
We prapose two hard copies of the first draft report for City staff review as wel! as an electronic�.pd�
version. We propose 4 hard copies of the second draft—one each for Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,
Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County, and City staff, Hennepin County conducts a brief review of the
SWMP to determine its impact on their groundwater plans. As with the first draft,we will create a .pdf of
the second draft,
Following agency review,we will prepare a final report. Under the fee proposed here, we will provide 4
hard copies of the final report and an electronic version as described above. We will organize the report in
a three ring binder with tabs simifar to the current report. All report sections(those updated and those
from the 2002 SWMP}will be consistent in font antl formatting. Several 8-1/2 x 11" figures will
complement the report sections. Examples af appropriate figures include;
• Location Map{by Bonestroo)
Ctfy of Orono Page 3
Surface Water Management Plan January 8,2009
• 2030 Land Use Map(from City)
• Existing Land Use Map(from City, if available}
• County BiolQgical Survey(from public saurces, prepared by Bonestroo) -
• Wet(and Functions and Values Map(either from previous City work or from new work by MCWD,
formatted by Bonestroo}
• Figure showing the following four subwatersheds{for the purpose of the Phosphorus Reduction
Plan};
o Long Lake Creek upstream of Long Lake
o Long Lake Creek from Long Lake to Tanager Lake
o Painters Creek
o Lake Minnetonka
• Soils map(from public sources, prepared by Bonestroo)
• Implementation Priorities Map(prepared by Bonestroo)
• DNR PWI map(from public sources,formatted by Bonestroo)
The Surface Water System Map from Orono's 2002 SWMP will not be modified but will be intluded in the
updated SWMP. Appendix sections A thraugh F will be inserted into the updated SWMP as currently
formatted and without revision or update, Appendix G will be updated to reflett changes in practices and
Orono`s new Gaals and Policies. Appendices H and I will either be integrated into the Wetland
Management Sectian or replaced as appendices by materials prepared by MCWD that are more consistent
with their wetland management program.
Typicai agency review cornments for a SWMP run one to two pages for smaller communities and can
generally be resolved for $1,500 in labor cost. We assume,for the purposes of our fee estimate,that the
watershed comments are of similar scope.
Schedule
Once authorized to proceed,we can have a draft report to City staff in eight weeks, Once staff comments
are received we will then submit the SWMP to Metropolitan Council, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
and Hennepin County. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has 6�days to review the plan after which we
respond to their comments and obtain their board's approval of Orono's SWMP. Subsequent to this the
Orono City Council adopts the SWMP and an approved copy is sent to Metropolitan Council. The follawing
table summarizes our proposed schedule.
Item Timeframe
Authorization to roceed lanuar 12, 2009
Cit staff be ins review of draft SWMP March 10, 2009
Cit staff comments obtained March 31, 20Q9
A enc review be ins April 8, 2009
Agency cornments due June 8, 2049
Revised SWMP and MCWD board approval 1uly, 2409
Orono City Council atlopts SWMP August, 2009
We will submit the revised Environmental ManagemenUPratection Plan for Orono`s Comprehensive Plan by
February of Z009 so staff can proceed an assembling the comprehensive plan for community review.
I
�i�
Cify oi Orono Page 4
Surface Water Management Plon Jc�nuary 8, 2009
Proposed Compensation
We propase a fee of$18,400 for the work described above, Miscelfaneous expenses would be billed as
encountered and are estimated at$500. The propased fee includes printing reports as described above. ff -
additional reparts are desired, we would gladly print these for the City on a time and materiais basis. We
could provide a cost quate for additional reports if requested.
Hourly 1'ask: Deveiopment of a Phasphorus Reduction Plan
As required by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Orana must develop a plan to reduce phosphorus in its
surface water discharge by 230 Ibslyr over the 10-year span covered by the updated SWMP. This effort
entails identifying potential projects and development cantrols and quantifying their benefit toward
phosphorus reduction, We will also review projects since 2000 and apply phosphorus reduction obtained
from these to the 236 pound target identified by the watershed.
On January 7, 2009 we met with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District t�discuss the outline of the _
phosphorus reduction plan. We determined that Orono's best tourse of action entails a collaborative and -
iterative pracess with the watershed. As we discussed, Orono will develop its initial draft through the -
combined efforts of Orono and Bonestroo staff. Subsequent revision to that draft due to watershed
comments may also involve the combined efforts of Orono and Bonestroo staff.
The Phosphorus Reductian Plan will be a separate section of the SWMP but will be integrated with other
applicable sections including the Assessment, Goals and Policies, and Implementation Sections. We
propose that the Phosphorus Reduction Plan rely on modeling already completed by the watershed and not
on new modeling performed by Orono.
The level of effort needed to prepare a Phosphorus Reduction Pfan is somewhat uncertain. This
consideration and the fact that City and Watershed staff resources will be used, ieads us to recommend �
hourly compensation for this specific work item.
Potential Supplemental Services
As we discussed at our meeting, Orono might benefit by having a cohesive and single source of stormwater
design guidance. A level one tlesign guide takes the form of a several page document outlining:
1, Submittal requirements
2, Design requirements for stormwater infrastructure
3. Performance measures(volume,water quality, and rate control}and how these are evaluated
The design guide complements the SWMP by praviding more detail on specific elements of the stormwater
system and by outlining how different parts of the system are analyzed, A level two design guide adds
more introductary discuss+an on design and modeling theory—further cementing a consistent approach to
design and analysis within Orono`s stormwater systern. We have an example of a level one and level two
design guide that we could provide for your review. We could prepare Orono's design guidance for the
follawing compensation:
• Level 1: $2,540
• Level Z; $3,600
Cify of Orono Page 5
Surface Water Management P1an January 8,2009
The foliowing table summarizes our proposed campensation.
Item Com ensation
Surface Water Mana ement Plan $18,900
Phosphorus Reduction Plan Hourly
Level 1 Desi n Guide or $2,500
Level 2 Design Guide $3,600
I will be involved in project oversight, contratt management,and invoicing. I#you have any questior�s
regarding this propasal please contact me at b51-604-4740.
Sincerely,
BONE R , INC. -
Bob Barth
Project Manager
Cc: Tom Kellogg, Bonestroo
�
�
_� .
r �
(�¢ ('v��"� Cc`� 4:f\.�C i C i/L�r`�:V J.�-T� -
�
8. Map showing the service areas through 2030, staging plan if available, and any
proposed changes in governmental boundaries affecting the community, including any
areas designated for orderly annexation.
b. Local Surface Water Management Plan Elements
Background
In the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, all cities and townships are covered by one or more
watershed management organization (WMO). WMOs are required to prepare plans to
address watershed management issues (see Minn. Stat. Sec. 103B.201). Cities and
townships are required to prepare local water management plans that are consistent with
all applicable WMO plans (see Minn. Stat. 103B.235). In addition, Phase 1 and II
NPDES MS4 permit communities are required to prepare stormwater pollution
prevention plans (SWPPPs). Some MS4 communities are listed as nondegradation
communities and required to provide information in their SWPPP related to
nondegradation. With the multitude of planning requirements, there is a need to
coordinate and consolidate all of these different planning documents. Comprehensive
local water management plans (plans that address all of the water management planning
requirements out there) are crucial in helping the region meet its goal of no adverse
impact on area waterbodies.
In 1995, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act was amended to require that each city and
township's comprehensive plan include a local water management plan. Local water
management plans need to be consistent with the requirements in Minnesota Statutes
103B and in the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Local water management plans are
reviewed by the Metropolitan Council (Council) as part of the local comprehensive
planning process prior to their approval by the WMO and adoption by the city or
township. Local water management plans are crucial in helping the rebion meet the
challenge of cost-effective management of water quality and quantity.
Local Water Plan Requirements
Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 (Metropolitan Area Local Water Management), requires
the local water management plans to address the specific elements. In the Council's 2030
Regional Development Framework, the Council adopted a water management goal for the
region, "the quality of water leaving the metropolitan area is as good as the water quality
entering the metropolitan area, and in compliance with federal and state regulations." To
meet this goal, the Council has linked the control of pollution from point and nonpoint
sources. The 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan states that if a community
does not have a local water management plan as part of its 2008 comprehensive plan
update, the comprehensive plan will be found incomplete for review. If the community
has a plan that does not meet Council requirements for local water management plans, the
Council will likely find the plan to have an impact on our system, thus requiring a plan
modification.
The following list is an expansion of the requirements under Chapter 84l 0. The list is
intended to clarify, through additional detail, what communities should do to ensure that
their local water management plan is consistent with the Council's 2030 Water Resources
Management Policy Plan.
83
1. Purpose of plan
2. Water resource management related a�reements
3. Executive summary
4. Land and water resources inventory (For this requirement and others that follow,
communities are encouraged to use as much of the WMO plan as they can. The
community should be aware that not all WMO plans will contain the leve] of detail
needed for the community and in those instances,the community will need to provide
additional information).
5. Establishment of policies and goals
A. All communities need a strong policy statement to show that they are committed to
a goal of no adverse impact(nondegradation) for area water resources.
B. All communities need goals for their lakes consistent with Watershed Management
Organization plan goals.
C. The Council's 2030 Regional Development Framewos•k classified communities as
urban planning areas (developing and developed areas) and rural planning areas
(rural centers, agricultural, diversified rural and rural residential areas).
Communities classified as developed or developing and MS4 communities in the
rural planning area need to include actions that show the community is committed
to the goal of no adverse impact or nondegradation goal for area water resources.
Actions should include:
i. Adopting erosion and sediment contro] ordinances that are consistent with
NPDES Construction Stormwater permit and MS4 permit requirements
ii. Preparing wetland management plans (refer to 8G for more details of what
should be in a wetland management plan)
� iii. Adopting ordinances that control peak runoff(Suggested guidance -
Minnesota Stormwater Manual)
iv. Adopting best management practices for development that will result in TSS
and TP reductions of 80%and 50%respectively
v. Adopting best management practices for redevelopment that will result in
TSS and TP reductions (Suggested guidance - Minnesota Stormwater
Manual)
vi. Including funding mechanisms that support implementation and enforcement
D. Developing and developed communities that are a Phase I or Phase II NPDES
MS4 permit community need to integrate their Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan policies and goals into their local water management plan, in accordance with
MPCA requirements and schedules.
E. Developed and developing communities listed as nondegradation communities as
part of their NPDES MS4 permit need to revise their Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan to include the required information for nondegradation.
Nonde�radation policies and goals should be summarized or integrated into their
local water mana�ement plans.
F. Rural planning area (rural centers, agricultural, diversified rural and rural
residential) communities need to include actions that show the community is
84
committed to the goal of no adverse impact (nondegradation goal) for area water
resources. Actions should include:
i. Adopting erosion and sediment control ordinances that are consistent with
NPDES Construction Stormwater permit and MS4 permit requirements
where applicable
ii. Preparing wetland management plans (refer to 8G for more details of what
should be in a wetland management plan)
iii. Adopting ordinances that control peak runoff
iv. Including funding mechanisms that support implementation and enforcement
6. Assessment of problems and corrective actions for problems identified
A. All communities need to assess the water quality and quantity related problems in
their community,prioritize the problems and include actions to adequately solve
the problems that were identified.
B. All communities must acknowledge and list any impaired waters within their
jurisdiction as shown on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters list. A TMDL is
a calculation that determines the allowable pollutant load that can be discharged
into the impaired water such that the water is not impaired. A community that
discharges water to an impaired waterbody within or adjacent to the community,
needs to explain how and if it intends to be involved with the development of the
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study.
i. If a TMDL study is not completed, the city should identify the priority it
places on addressing impaired waters and how the city intends to participate
in the development or implementation of TMDL studies.
ii. If the city is not directly involved in the TMDL study,the city should show
how it intends to implement the study findings once the study is completed
by the responsible party.
iii. If a TMDL study is completed for the impaired water,the community needs
to include an implementation strategy including funding mechanisms that
will allow them to carry out the TMDL requirements.
More information on the MPCA's TMDL program can be found on the
MPCA's web site at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/tmdl/index html.
7. Financial considerations
A. All communities need to include a 5-year CIP that includes funds to solve the
problems identified in number 6 above. �
B. All communities need to include funding in their CIP or operating budget for
ongoing maintenance of their stormwater infrastructure.
8. Implementation priorities and pro�ram
A. Developed, developing and any MS4 communities in the rural planning area need
to provide information on how they intend to manage stormwater:
i. Include an erosion and sediment control ordinance consistent with NPDES
Construction Stormwater permit and MS4 permit requirements
ii. Identify ways to control runoff rates (subgested guidance - Minnesota
Stormwater Manual) so that land-altering activities do not increase peak
stormwater flow from the site for a 24-hour precipitation event with a return
frequency of 1 or 2, l 0, and l 00 years.
85
iii. Require criteria for wet detention basin minimum pollutant removal
efficiency to protect and improve stormwater runoff quality. Best
management practices for development and redevelopment should result in
TSS and TP reductions (suggested guidance - Minnesota Stormwater
Manual).
iv. Require infiltration of the first '/z inch of runoff from the impervious areas
created by new projects where there are A and B soils. Use of infiltration
techniques is prohibited in some potential stormwater hotspot areas, e.g.
vehicle fueling areas (suggested guidance - Minnesota Stormwater Manual).
v. Recommend adding a soil amendment and requiring soil ripping 1 '/z-2 feet
after mass grading is complete for all soil types.
vi. Require infiltration in wellhead protections areas to be based on the
community's wellhead protection plan and at the discretion of the local
government. �
vii. Require pretreatment of stormwater prior to discharge into all lakes and
streams.
B. Rural planning area communities, excluding MS4 communities, need to provide
information on how they intend to mana�e stormwater:
i. Include an erosion and sediment control ordinance consistent with NPDES
Construction Stormwater permit requirements
ii. Identify ways to control runoff rates so that land-altering activities do not
increase peak stormwater flow from the site for a 24-hour precipitation event
with a return frequency of l or 2 years
iii. Require criteria for wet detention basin minimum pollutant removal
efficiency to protect and improve stormwater runoff quality for areas where
development is occurring. Best management practices for redevelopment
(suggested guidance - Minnesota Stormwater Manual) should result in TSS
and TP reductions.
C. All communities with designated trout streams must identify actions in their plan
to address the thermal pollution effects from development.
D. All communi�ies with special waters, such as outstanding resource value waters,
need to meet state requirements for development near these waters (see Appendix
A part B.1-8 of the Minnesota Construction General Permit for a list of these
waters and Appendix A part C.1-5 for specific requirements). �
E. All communities need to consider the use of stormwater practices that promote
infiltration/filtration and decrease impervious areas (better site design and
integrated stormwater management), where practical.
F. All communities need to include information on the types of best management
practices to be used to improve stormwater quality and quantity and the
maintenance schedule for the best management practices.
G. All communities need to include a wetland manabement plan or a process and
timeline to prepare a plan. At a minimum, the wetland management plan should
incorporate a function and value assessment for wetlands. Other items to address in
the plan include the pretreatment of stonnwater prior to discharge into all wetland
types, and the use of native vegetation as buffers for high quality wetlands. Buffers
should be consistent with the functions and values identified in the plan.
86
H. Developed and developing communities that are a Phase II NPDES MS4 permit
community need to include information on how the community is meeting the
permit conditions for required Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans:
i. Public education and outreach
ii. Public participation/involvement
� iii. Illicit discharge detection and elimination �
iv. Construction site runoff control
v. Post-construction runoff control
vi. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping.
vii. Activities planned to be undertaken along with numerica] goals, strategies,
and timelines
viii. Funding source for the various required activities.
I. Developed and developing communities which are required to revise their
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan to include the required nondegradation
information as part of their NPDES MS4 permit need to summarize or integrate the
nondegradation information into the local water management plan.
9. Amendment procedures: Each local plan must include year the plan extends to and
establishes the process by which amendments may be made.
87
Orono
The City of Orono has land in the Painter Creek, Lon� Lake Creek, and Lake Minnetonka
subwatersheds. In addition to the general requirements for Local Management Plans, the
following items must be addressed in the city's Local Plan.
8� � � �_ r1_: � ;,4.,;F�
12 � l `
�..n°�� � - _... _.�. .� -� .= N00�'c. '
� �i 6
I �` - Private Dtrve� :�J-� ..- --.:� --
` �i Priv�te Drnre_—��. � � � ��_.�" �-
Independ�nce � j� � _ ' �?"--� -Piymouth
-� . ,
� -�i ';, � tONG �� �'t Long Lake Road • �-'
� I . - --� \--- �long Lake - �`�'s�Long Lake+� _
' -r' - . _' ' -�:"� . - ' _
�� �y lu�me TYaU`� i `�
�� i- .. � '� �'Orono � � '~ i. _ ___ � r.�2
o ; - +' Wayzata .'
�_ �. ti �r�
�
-'�.S7U86S� , prv i_;� � d !, .R
� '^ - .. 94v .- . Fox 5t : . -naj•. _ .
_'�"
�MIM`f(IStd ,4tAYWELL `� ._. l � � - . �hA`r'_ATA� :.1�
• � _ � 8av , �,,_•T�N�G , gq�
� =ORES'" NOR*N�j �o i�� � �� /
r RRl4 E� � .. � .-.J :'101 `�
I �'r1 �, � -��i��, .
.._ � JENN/i'AGSBAY,.� �_` �1 .,-'----._ �C� 51„ 7��'. �' -.. �.s craa
. ' !. ��-/ C��SiA! �� VO(.��d
- ��"'-'" s W flll
-�'� '+VEST � � �- Bav �15 � '
. ' AP.M ' CvVFR �
T ti ''� � - LAri E : . . .
1` .i. � h'L�i27h .:. � ".�� -
�- .� � .�.� - .
5/ —� _. I f � �' Minnetonka 8each � � 'r.a�e�.n�e� c.epie«,�a�
'�..f Q H;sdog�c Bo�ndo��
tivo`. Spriny,Park � D�,,,eiau�,as�n�.�«,n.a�
Mound: � ����,o���,
�z�
' � � ❑ainaga Iswas
_ - . $PP,iNG � � Z - . _ '- �� .���,:.
� COCNS F�Rti � . . \.:� .
BAv 5a" J .
'`' Tonka Bay . , o 5 0 25 u G 5 �
�OVYtR / .�"
�' �.----- _ _ , _ar,e sour,+ hQ �r,ies;
Flgure/. Subwatershed drainage areas and reported or modeled drainage issues.
Phosphorus Load Reduction
The Local Plan must include strategies and specific steps for the achievement of the following
load reductions assigned to the City of Orono. These strategies may include operational, land
use, and capital improvements implemented since 2000, and those planned for the future. The
Plan must also include a provision for annually reporting progress towards this goal.
Table 1. Re uired Annual Phos horus Load Reductions,Citv of Orono(in ounds).
Subwatershed Receivin Waters Annual Reduction
Lake Minnetonka Maxwell, North Arm,Nonh Lower,Jennings Bay, 152
South Lower,S rina Park, Stubbs,West Arm
Painters Creek Jennin�s Ba I?
Lon�Lake Creek U stream of Lon Lake 3j
Lon�Lake Creek Long Lake to Tanaaer Lake 31
Total 230
Landlocked Basins
The HHPLS identified several landlocked subwatershed units in the city (see Figure 1). The
Local Plan must identify any significant non-outletting areas; discuss and incorporate strategies
to minimize new volumes and address any flooding issues.
Floodin� or Modeled High Water Locations
The HHPLS identified three specific locations in Orono where there are known or modeled
flooding issues (see Figure 1 and Table 2). The Local Plan must identify these and any other
known flooding areas; evaluate the associated risks to public health, safety, and property; assess
whether the risk of occasional flooding is acceptable; and set forth a plan to address the flooding
issues.
Table 2. Known or modeled floodin issues,Cit of Orono(source: HHPLS).
Descri tion Modeled Event
Fox S[reet 100- ear
East LonQ Lake 100-year
Private Drive South of HWY 6 100-year
Flow Velocitv and Erosion
The HHPLS identified three locations where the model indicates existing and future high pipe
peak flow velocities may require erosion control measures or energy dissipaters at inlets and
outlets (see Figure 1 and Table 3). The Local Plan must assess the need for erosion control at
this location and any other locations where excessive velocities may be contributing to localized
erosion.
Table 3. Known or modeled eak i e flow velocities issues,City of Orono(source: HHPLS).
Descri tion Modeled Event
LLC-16 Private Drive 100- ear
LLC-48 Luce Line trail 100-year
LLC-24 East Long Lake 100- ear
Land Conservation
Large areas of Orono have been identified as Key Conservation Areas (see Figure 2). These
areas include the Long Lake Creek and Classen Creek corridors; key riparian wetlands to the
lakes and streams in the city; and other wetland, tributary, and upland connections between those
corridors and Lake Minnetonka. The Local Plan must identify these areas and the strategies the
city will use to protect and conserve the hydrologic and ecologic values of these areas and other
natural areas in the city.
Operations and Maintenance: Previous Proiects
The District has previously completed construction of a detention pond at the outlet into Long
Lake downstream of County Road 6, and retains responsibility for inspecting, maintaining and
dredging the pond.
Ma le PI i � � � =� �'� `
aa ,c. .�'� ,��` Medina �-���oor,�r • s Dea
�ti,�� � ". _� �'�,' ; � -� ''
`� �xF;�F�! - ^�` f „ � ^ ' _�6.,� � MO�'�fGEC:
._ . . .� 5" � �i i � : ' z.�.•- � ( . .i �,
'. � "�...`�} �'��� � � it, `�- . ,c� ' �y� � �.. �
Ind pind�nte,y� � 'kN` � �,`'��.� �. �,r�` �'-< ,�£� ;Plymouth
3�< S � � r ,}� _,."';,r �--�
� ~J��Sxj(1:7. �f'..�\: �V�����'1��.1+� � LONG .,t. .'+�� �`�� _�f-"1 _
f x � h. � n''>'�'�,�` �, L ��ig� k���L,,,��Y � [.�°"`� -
�,—.` F�t7�r'_'"�,?� � ..'..��`yy�' �,/'`5���+j' ' � Y
. � 18 ,J�_ ��� -A�, � \-'������� ..,p✓" '"i/Y� ... ��1 , `� �
1 .� '`..'7 �i
� � �.�=��1 r, � �t<',� j'�,,,,�^ 11D Yhlayza
� , � �
��--� { �}, � ;<' `x �y '' ,� �-
��/'� fV �[�� � �"r I ..v / �� ,�
J �
L .� `' i ' sruaes _ �' , � `"�/ ��' " �' . . � i .=
, � ti
i 4�. - � --;
s�- �� �-`�e''� Ordno � ��� �
i netrista i :� ,unx�,.c ��( ��� ara _ '
� � � �� BAV �.� ��a� ANAG - '�ai ne�D uKi�g i �.uny�q Y
-•L � _, i ,�_J� 1
�� �6RE5'�r NORFF�n35 �� =( ��� �� ��� �. �-
ARht `�' � �-�+m ��.�..�bv:atarsvx6 MOE
,-'�� `_ � Kr ��v�r,awn��es=. .
JENNlNGS BAY/�ti� ;�- �� b -�ga
\ r +.,��- �� �� �j(����sti ct Pr�rRy 1ie�s
!
r -�'� � CRYSFAL �,d 1 a
�S:re�trR ana�1aar.�areas
`���-�,� :NES7 � BRY �� . �
L �a3r.s�-�rpen SRace /'-
�.\ AR.M ���+� �:,
� '��, 1 N �ti � � i /� f �
A
���
`� � 'Mirinetol�k�B ch o.5oz5 0 0.5 '� f's�
t
5 �-- ,� pring Fe�k�"F_`� �� �Miies i
NG �
MOU�'IC��� �"� `1 �1., � y,
'� , � " Dee.pta veli
—1 � CS 'IZS �
U � � .
l '�!� /� f
�:. COOKS ���PARF'J `, ��\ __' .. �� . '4;x _�� o?.�'}.
-� BAY ��.' 84Y� \
t .,✓ �� •,. • LOWER f` . �
` : _ _' —�i,� To ka ay LAKESOUTH .
�i
Frgure 2. Key Coaservation Areas in Oi-o�ro and udjacent areas.
Potential Capital Pro_iects
Several potential improvement projects have been identified (see Figure 3), including:
• Lona Lake Creek Stream Restoration • Stubbs Bay Internal Load Management
• LLC-48 Detention Pond • Swan Lake Pond
• Classen Creek Stream Restoration • LLC-2 Regional Infiltration
� Wetland Restorations • CLC-2 Regional Infiltration
• Katrina Marsh Restoration • NA-LM Regional Infiltration
The Plan should acknowledge how the township intends to work together with the District to
identify and evaluate potential projects.
i!I
z9 .. ._ - .L.,S._:- . *
ea -- Medina • __ ,�,a=.
. � ,'- � ��Z�� , ---WetWnd Restoration �. � '_ c .��xo
` � yl- �_ LLC-2 Infiltration- - _ ��' �=;"`'� -- '4
-,♦ -��.���_ ��a Marsh� � � �' �\. ,.���' � _. . .
�Ind pend8nce_!+ ', Rescoranoo _ 4f'��`c� _ Plymouth— -
_�_Z
�...
Katrina Marsh Int � • �
� .Outlet Structure . CLG2., �- -
Stubbs Bay iltratlon� , '�Long Lak`e"j_"��,��
.... '. _ ` Internal Load_.. ' � .. ' � ".� -
r � ' _Classen Creek � �1_� A �
�y� _ r�, � Management �,,. � �nagement �„��� � -
NA-LM��. ; . -��. �� � � �� -
■
Inflltration — � � Stream�,.�.. '
� � ' ,.. OttLLC-18 ..3-�"'• i `Restoration �.1._.,,- i r .
--- � `
� -Swan LakePond' i -- � ?' WayZata ���'
0 9": �Pond �� t s' � i
- : �
. ' n,,. "Exca6aHon i ., -,1l - '•,i��.._ "
� ' � 751— '� '
-'Ntinn trisia n;ia ' f' f ' 7-'^�_ v✓P a7� 17
�@ , . � � . �fiG. � JAuE � BA'.
� � �, _ Y : Wetland
r-ORfS.' ;-'i6 Restoration �� �� � ,pJ
• -._ ... : � i _,� . �.
- .. . :c4Y. - �.� l,�s�1R. �.=: ' _:Ad
_. .'t. _ . �' . �..
_ -' -�' c�:sra� ',� � .Woodland
' ' W'c_" 8AY i�y � . �
�. aP.'. �� ` LOWE?
�KC /
yT ^ �� r�` .,/ �� * NC�:� � J�-,
PotentialProjects '� f T"�- �M19innetonka�Beach ' ;-,,,�,s�„a���.y�eow�.,, ,J
■ �n�ivaoa, ' -.� __,� : � n.aom ewnaa�
� Intastructure Spring�ark,�:: _ �� � ��� �
� Q Lan.t'oWa�wb'rvatwsf�aas
� Intemal load R/gnn -i • ...-• ' ��
'725 i . •Counr;Otcn
* �.\eceUaneai. ` . � . • Ra�.touat���onyiala,l P�qa.:tf
� �- S �°- , _ , _ - �J
Fwa a �
� Vx11anE R»saoc� � � j �� `� � � �
� TonKa F�ay ,:;�a�,, _ �e c�� G o c: �
'� StraamRe�daalion ' `j _ ' -..� :
-� - � �'n:E SC:;" %i�S�IIOTt'W �P.111d5�
,htt_�.:
Figure 3. Pote�uinl District cnpital projrc rs i��Ornnn.
Other Issues
Cities must prepare and submit annually to the District, in a format approved by the MPCA and
District, a report detailing actions taken in the previous year to implement the requirements of
the WRMP.
Areas in Orono drain to Long Lake, Tanager Lake, Jennin;s Bay, and West Arm, lakes that do
not currently meet state nutrient standards and which may be in the future designated as Impaired
Waters. At such time as that may occur, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study would be
prepared. The capital improvements program, operatin�pro;rams, and watershed nutrient
reduction goals in this Plan may need to be revised to achieve the load reductions that would be
identified in the TMDL. Once that TMDL is finalized and approved by the MPCA and EPA, the
City would have 18 months to revise its NPDES permit to include TMDL implementation
activities.
The District will periodically evaluate conditions in Painter Creek and Classen Creek and will
work cooperatively with the City to spot repair erosion that is contributing to downstream
sediment conveyance.
, �linnehaha Creek {9atershed Di�trict
Local Water Mana�ement Pfan Review Checklist
Minnesota Stafe Law Chapter 103B Reyuiremcnts
Included Requirement Minimum Content Suggested Section Comments
Describe existing and Narrative Land&Water
proposed physical Resource Inven[ory
environment and land use
Define drainage areas and the Narrative,map Land&Water
volumes,rates,and paths of Resource Imentory
stormwater runoff,and the
stormwater system
Identify azeas and elevations Map of stormwater Implementation
for stormwater storage system,pollution Program
adequate to meet control structures,
performance standacds pipes and sizes,
established in the watershed outfalls and water
plan surface elevations
Identify known flood problem Narrative,map Establishment of
areas and acceptable risk Goals&Policies
Identify land-locked Narrative,map Establishment of
subwatersheds and strategies Goals&Policies
to manage stormwater
volumes
Identify areas of high erosion Narrative,map Establishment of
potential and strategies to Goals&Policies
implement corrective actions
Define water quantity and Narrative.location Implementation
water quality protection map of Program
methods adequate to meet improvements,table
performance standards summarizing
established in the watershed quantified load
plan , reductions
Identify regulated areas lvarrative Land&Water
Resource Inventory
Identify Key Conservation Narrative,map Establishment of
Areas and strategies to meet Goals&Policies,
performance standazds Implementation
Program
Contrast wetland regulatio❑ Narrative,map, Establishment of
and management table of weUand Goals&Policies
classification with MCWD management
Functional Assessment of classification
Wetlands
Set forth an implementation Narrative,location lmplementation
pro�ram.including a map of Program
description of official improvements,table
conuols and,as appropriate,a summazizing
capital improvement plan schedule,cost,
benefits,purpose
and description of
each proposed
capital
improvement
Describe permittina process Narrative Implementation
for land and wetland Program
alteration work;evaluate the
need for future amendment
Describe conformance with Narrative,map of Implementation
NPDES Program including impaired waters Program
TMDL's and Nonde_radation
Minnesota State Rules Cha ter 84]0 Re uirements _, '
Included Re uiremeut S ecifics Comments -MliSA Reference
Purpose Purpose of Water based
pro�rams '
Water Resource Include a2reemenu
recreation areas
Management and land ownership
Related Fish and wildlife
Agreements habitat,
Executive manacement plans,
Summary surveys
Land and Water All relevant data -MLCCS Data
Resource on:
Inventory -Biological Studies
Precipitation -State
Geology and Mana�ement Plans
topographic data Unique features
Surface water and scenic areas
resources data
-Public waters Pollutant sources
and ditches (landfills,
-National hazardous waste,
Wetlands feedlots.etc.) �
Inventorv Map Safe Drinking
-Functional Water Act
values of Information*
wetlands pazk B Open Space
inventorv or plan Integration�
-Hydrologic
characteristics of Easement
public waters Dedication"
table if provided Low Impact
by DNR
Development*
-Maps showing
areas served by
stormwater lnterest Conflicts*
systems Stormwater Facility
identifyino ponds Ownership'
and outfalls
-100-yr flood Preliminary P*at
Development
levels and peak `Su plements to 5410,MCWD Com rehensive Plan
discharges of Establishment of Consistent with
existing and policies and eoals MCWD and
proposed establish the
stormwater pondc relation to local,
and channels Assessment of
problems
-Known flooding
Correctivc actions Nonstrucmral,
problems Programmatic,and
-Flood insurance Structural
studies
Financial Cost of plan
-W'ater 9�>iti' consideratian
data and PCA,
DOT.etc. Implementation On the local level:
information
priorities and
program
-Monitorin�sites
Regulatory controls
-Surface water
appropriationc Design
Groundwater performance
Data standards
Soil data lnformation
program
Land use and
Monitoring
public uti]iTy program
services
-Existing Land
Management
program
-Future Land lise
Amendments to Procedure for
Plan amendments
A endix
Land d Water Resource Inventon'Supplements
. Water Resources Re�ulatorv Program- Implementation Program Section
Included Re uirement S ecifics Comments
• Land lise c�Water Describe how land Included Re uirement S ecifics Comments
Quality use and water Assumption of
quality issues are MCWD Rules(if
reconciled at the desired)
local level in the
plan period and Rule B:Erosion Control
bevond
lnclude W ellhead Rule C:Floodplain Alteration
Safe Drinking Protection Plans and
Water Aot measures to protect Rule D:Wetland Protection
Information groundwater
Describe how water Rule N:Stormwater Management
resource protection Description of public review
is integrated into � process,vaziances,approvals;self
Pazk d Open Space pazks and open Procedura]Details issued permits
Integration space planning
Describe how
easement dedication Compliance Description of the monitoring and
and protective Monitoring enforcement program
convenants will be
Easement used for water Desciption of the internal or
Dedication resowce protection contracted expertise utilized for
Identifi�azeas review and monitoring of water
elligible for low resource permits with annual
impact development budget(if extemal)allocated for
implementation and Technical Expertise such activities
Low Impact integration into land Identification of the entity
Development use regulation responsible for implementation of
Describe conflicts WCA for those areas within the
betweeen Watershed District:include
development code Wetland annual budget(if external)for
setbacks and water Conservation Act such activities
resource
requiremenu and Update of ordinances or consent
how conflicts aze District Rule to District implementation within
Interest Conflicts resolved Revision one year ofrevision by MCWD
Demonsuate
compliance with
requirement for
stormwater
facilities.wetlands
and wetland buffers
Stormwater Faciliri- on outlots Nnthin
Ownership developments
Include language
within subdivision
ordinanceto
forward preliminar}�
Preliminary Plat plats to MCWD for
Development revie���
�
Im lementatioo Priorit��Items-Ap endix C.MCWD Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
Included Requirement Minimum Content Suggested Section Comments �
Phosphorus Load Reduction Narrative,integrated Implementation Pro�mam
implementation plan
including capital
improvemenu and
programmatic acitivites,
summary table
Landlocked Basins Narrative,map Implementation Program
Flooding or Modeled High Narrative,integrated ]mplementation Program
Water Locations implementation plan
including capital
improvements and
programmatic acitivites
Flow Velocity and Erosion Narrative,integrated Implementation Program
implementation plan
including capital
improvements and
programmatic acitivites
Land Conservation harrative,ma Im lementation Pro am
Operations and Maintenance: Narrative,schedule,capital ]mplementation Program
Previous Prolects bud et,ma
Capital lmprovements Pian Narrative,capital Implementation Pro6mem
improvements table;purpose
statement,project
description,schedule,cost,
location(map)for each
individua] rolect
Housekee ing Requirements-Implementation Program Section
Included Re uirement S eci5cs Comments
Housekeeping
Requirements
Describe Current
Practices
Potential
Improvements to
Current Practices
Bamers to
Implementing
Improvements
Implementation
Program Integration
Anticipated benefit
to water quality
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR WHITE AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
MANr1GEMENT TEAM
FROM: WILLIr�M WELLS, CIT'Y ADMINISTRIITOR
SUBJECT: PROCESS FOR VISIONING AND UOAL SETTING
DATE: J�NU�RY 12, 2009
The Council and Ciry Administrator will participate in a discussion regarding a process for visioning
and goal setting.
i �