Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-00981 - addn/remodel/repair Muffm CITY OF ORONO * 2 0 1 4 — 0 0 9 8 1 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 12/17/2014 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS 3035 CASCO POINT RD PIN 20-117-23-34-0001 LEGAL DESC REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0394 : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY 434-RESIDENTIAL VALUATION $ 150,000.00 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED: PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,GRADING/LANDSCAPING, ELECTRICAL(STATE) ADDITION NOTE: SILT FENCE SHOULD BE INSTALLED DOWN GRADIENT FROM THE PROPOSED WORK. INITIAL: NOTE: PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ESCROW FUNDS AN AS-BUILT SURVEY AND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPRQ�(IjL2 INITIAL: /ll� APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 1,356.75 D[ETZ BUILDERS LLC STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 75.00 29315 451ST AVENUE Payment(s) TOTAL 1,431.75 GAYLORD, MN 55334- (507)381-8554 CREDIT CARD 0538 1,431.75 Minnesota State License#: BUIL-20634396 OWNER HULBERT,JAY 3035 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and docs not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. Alit Applicant Permitee re Date Issue W y Signature Date CITY OF ORONO } BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NEW STRUCTURES OR ADDITIONS O Mailing Address: Permit number: PO Box 66 0 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006qDate received: - ` / 7� Street Address:, NIII Received by: yF ` 2750 Kelley Parkway 1 ��14 Plan review fee: 0 0 6 e kEsfio 'i, Orono, MN 55356 v7� 41_ e 9 Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: _ Job Site Address: �35 1�G-Sco yo-/. gog-6 Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR 1 APPLICANT INFORMATION. Name: (=-} State License# Expiration Date: Phone: cell O - /- 6,S office Mailing Address: Ae Contact Person: X1 Applicant is: CQontra6toO / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: v� PROPERTY OWNER I FORMATIO Name: Q 1 C Phone (day): ! -12 7 2 - 3 Address: ZA0 3,5-- C0-560a,,.. - RCA City: ore,(L Email and/or Fax ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORM TION- Name: S��r✓��- � =c�✓� LL(— Phone (day): 7S& Address: 100 City: (f-7 CE :Q ZIP: �SS Email and/or Fax: v-� PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of project: 1. Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3. Structure Type 4. Sewage Disposal & Water Supply ❑ New Construction Single Family with Residence Addition attached garage Garage/Accessory Bldg. )�'Public Sewer Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck ❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer ❑ Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse ❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water "Any earth movement may also require ❑ Commercial ❑ Other(specify) MCWD review&permits. ❑ Industrial ❑ Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Other: (specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1. Structure Dimensions 1. Structure Dimensions (continued) 2.Type of Construction a. Length (ft.)= "�g Number of bedrooms= ^/ t/ Wood/Frame b.Width (ft.)= —I Z Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry Areas in square feet Attached = I ❑ Metal ❑ Pole Bldg. c. Basement= Detached = ❑ ICF d. 15t Story = ❑ On-site Prefab e. 2nd Story= ❑ Off-site Prefab f. '/z Story = El Other(please specify): g.Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable ❑ ❑ Permit Application ❑ ❑ Proposed Building Plans ❑ ❑ MN State Energy Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Requirements Form ❑ ❑ Survey(meeting all requirements) ❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ ❑ Hardcover Calculation(s) ❑ ❑ Septic System Site Evaluation Report ❑ ❑ Access Permit ❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer Improvement Plan ❑ ❑ Engineered Plans for Retaining Walls 4 feet or above ❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee ❑ ❑ Application Escrow&Agreement ❑ ❑ Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they I are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information, the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 1 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. Applicant's Signature: Date: Owner's Signature: Date: Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:33 AM To: Imitchdietz@gmail.com' Cc: jhulbert@twincitiesautomotive.com; Melanie Curtis Subject: 3035 Casco Point Road /#2014-00981 Attachments: Escrow Agreement- Building Permit w Erosion Control 2014-00981.pdf Hello, Attached is an updated escrow agreement combining the land use application with the building permit. No additional money is needed at this time,just have the property owner sign the agreement and return. Once we have the updated, signed escrow agreement, we can issue the building permit. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono MN 55356 (physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing address) W 952.249.4620 , 952.249.4616 M cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Wednesday-Friday, December 24 -26, 2014& Thursday,January 1, 2015 1 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS Address/Permit Number: `:�035 VILSC 1w" Description of work: (� Septic review by: �A Date Approved: Zoning review by: Date Approved: 11 - 115. 2-01 Building review by: Date Approved: Grading review by: , i1 Q�_Ck Date Approved: Zoning District: 1 C, Zoning File#: — Reso#: f,P4-1 lir Reso Date: Zoning: Lot Area: Z iCP� /AC Width: Lot Coverage: 30 ](o, (o Sf_SF % Survey Submitted: es 0 No Date of Survey: 1016 6 /T Revised date(?): ( I ZJ Proposed Setbacks: Fr t(Lake) r(Street) ( N ( Sa E W ) ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland ide Side i t ado t -- ,5 NcG Defined Height: Peak Height: FFE: FFE minus 6 feet= (Existing Contour) Perimeter(linear feet) = 50% = #of Stories Ok? 0 YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: The distance between the lowest FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH •Tll distance between the top of slab and t highest point of the roof. If you have a... If you have a... • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the highest point ' ¢etween the highest point of the roof of the roof to the low point of the ` Af the low point of the corresponding SUBTRACTION corresponding gable or hipped roof SUBTRACTION ; t gable or hipped roof (BASED ON ROOF GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with (BASED Olf' •` GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with TYPE) windows): Subtract half the ROOF TYPE) ', ' windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the top of the between the top of the highest highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the point of the roof roof • A • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, mansard,etc):No subtraction. mansard,etc): subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab SUBTRACTION Subtract the distance between the (BASED ON and the highest existing grade adjacent to (BASED ON EXISTING basement/crawl space floor and the EXISTING the foundation. GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is less). EQUALS Defined building height F-1 EQUALS Defined building height Shoreland District MCWD Permit Receivect Avera a Lakeshore Setback Met? Bluff Y0 Yes 0 No N/A 0 Yes No es 0 No 'es 0 No 0 N/A Permit Number: Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed Variance Required CUP Required Overlay District Tier Hardcover Hardcover <3'100,LS. 79`tY•5 S Yes 0 No 0 Yes No 3+2_(a(75 33.�010 T e(s): Type(s): Updated: January 2013 kr 'u hlmtuh-mv:\forms\plan review checklist 2013.docx REMARKS (in-house): Fees to be Charged YES NO Permit t/ Plan Review State Surcharge Investigation Fee SAC—Number of SAC Units Other(specify) Square Footage $ per Square Footage Basement X = $ 15t Floor X = $ 2nd Floor X = $ Garage X = $ v Estimated Construction Value: $ LSCa oo Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits 0 Site Plumbing O Grading/ Filling Well 0 Hardcover Removal Mechanical 0 Fire Electrical 'Footing 0 Septic 0 Water Connection J2 Poured Wall 0 Fireplace 0 Sewer Connection 'Foundation Survey 0 Masonry 0 Lawn Irrigation eeckBed- 0 Mfg. Framing 6L Other(specify) Q' Insulation 1'ty LA".5 CA?P"^'� s-Built Survey l � F Final 0 Wetland Buffer W Other(specify) r o,,447I d N W 14 f fR�KA 11 r1 REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access: Existing: 0 YES 0 NO New: 0 YES 0 NO OFFICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED Updated: January 2013 v:\forms\plan review checklist 2013.docx Orono, N N Code of Ordinances Page 1 of 3 Sec.78-1405. - Nonencroachments. (a) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard setback requirements: (1) Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, cornices, eaves, gutters, and similar building elements, provided they do not extend more than two feet into a required yard. (2) Nameplate signs for one-family dwellings subject to the provisions of article X, division 4 of this chapter; lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property and is located at least five feet from the front lot line; public utility poles and overhead lines; mailboxes. (3) Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. Window wells including those for fire egress which do not extend more than five feet from the building. Sidewalks, driveways and parking areas when constructed, located and used in compliance with other provisions contained within chapter 78 (). Driveways may extend to within five feet of a side lot line. (4) In side or rear yards only, bays or cantilevers not to exceed a depth of two feet nor to contain an aggregate area of more than 20 square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of three feet and a depth of four feet, and open off-street parking. (5) In rear yards only, balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters, laundry drying equipment, and recreational equipment except as otherwise regulated; no accessory structure shall be closer than five feet from a rear lot line. (6) In side yards only, no accessory structure shall be closer than ten feet from any side lot line. (7) Air conditioning or heating equipment may be located within a required yard but shall be located within five feet of the building it serves; shall not be located within an existing or required drainage and/or utility easement; and shall be located at least five feet from any lot line. (8) Fences erected in all zoning districts are considered as a nonencroachment when they conform to the following standards: a. Nonlakeshore lots. 1. Fences and walls within a required front yard or side street yard shall not exceed a height of 42 inches above original grade. 2. Fences and walls within a required rear or side yard shall not exceed a height of six feet above original grade. b. Lakeshore lots. 1. Fences within the required street (rear)yard or side street yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed 42 inches above original grade. Exception: A fence not exceeding six feet in height may be located along the street lot line of a lake frontage lot which abuts a major thoroughfare. A major thoroughfare for purposes of this section means any about:blank 10/22/2014 Orono, MN Code of Ordinances Page 2 of 3 county road or state highway. If such fence involves fill or berming, the total combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed six feet above the height of the crown of the major thoroughfare. 2. Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed six feet in height, and any portion located lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line shall not exceed 42 inches in height. The term "average lakeshore setback line" means a line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner's principal residence structure and the most lakeward projection of the adjacent affected principal residence structure. 3. Fences shall not be constructed within the defined lakeshore yard of a lakeshore lot, i.e., shall not be located within 75 feet of the shoreline for general development lakes, 100 feet for recreational lakes, or 150 feet for natural environment lakes. c. Special provisions. Split rail fences of no more than three rails within a required front, street or side street yard may have a maximum top rail height of 48 inches above original grade. Board rail fences within a front, street or side street yard for the specific purpose of enclosing permitted domestic animals may have a top rail height of 60 inches and shall be no more than 50 percent opaque. d. Intersection sightline obstruction prohibited. No fence shall be installed so as to obstruct a required clear view at street intersections as required by section 78-1371 () e. Fence construction and maintenance. 1. The owner of a fence shall maintain it in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance and shall not allow it to become or remain in disrepair or in a dangerous condition. 2. Fences shall be installed with the finished side facing neighboring properties or the street. The term "finished side" means that side having no structural supports. (9) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered nonencroachments when they conform with the following standards: a. Each monument, with a maximum of two per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; c. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with section 78-1467 () e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; f. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a about:blank 10/22/2014 Orono, MN Code of Ordinances Page 3 of 3 minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; h. Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 () and at the discretion of the planning director. i. When a gate is proposed, the following requirements must be met: 1. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and 2. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and 3. Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and 4. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met(if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405 Q(8), and 5. Gates must maintain an opacity level of no greater than 25 percent, and 6. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and 7. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved, traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking. A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. j. A building permit is required for installation. A survey must be submitted depicting where the monuments will be placed, and the property corner pins must be located for inspection purposes. (b) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on structure height requirements: (1) Parapet walls that extend no more than three feet above the height of the building. (2) HVAC cooling towers. (3) Elevator penthouses. (Code 1984,§ 10.03(15);Ord. No.211 2nd series,§§ 1-5, 11-26-2001;Ord. No. 12 3rd series,§ 1, 5-24-2004;Ord. No.30 3rd series, § 1, 11-28-2005;Ord. No. 43 3rd series,§ 1,2-25-2008,Ord. No. 106 3rd series,§22, 6-10-2013) about:blank 10/22/2014 Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:52 AM To: 'Wes Sampson' Cc: Mike Sharratt Subject: RE: Hulbert Addition and Remodel I reviewed your attached plan and the questions below. Regarding the side setback, it looks acceptable. Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 >-� mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us From: Wes Sampson [mailto:wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 12:45 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Mike Sharratt Subject: RE: Hulbert Addition and Remodel Melanie: We need your input on another item.We are in process of revising the drawings for the Hulbert addition and remodel. 1. We have the exterior face of concrete at the line of the existing deck based on your previous comments to us (see emails below); the 2.5" of the rigid insulation for the ICF (insulated concrete form) and the 1.5" allotted for the stone veneer below the siding to grade are outside the line of the existing deck. 2. Where the screen porch occurs on the upper level the studs for the porch cant out 2" beyond the face of the concrete below with the face of the%" sheathing applied to the studs to align with the exterior face of the rigid insulation to enable siding to run from one level to the next without an offset. 3. Is this within the requirement that the addition must be within the outline or boundary of the existing deck? Is a 2" cant on 2 sides allowed for the screen porch?The screen porch is one level above grade. We have attached a section at%" through the lower level wall at the bathroom and the elevation of the screen porch in the background to illustrate the relationships explained above, we also have a proposed lower level plan at%" for you to look at; the existing deck outline in the heavier dashed perimeter line work. Call if you have any questions, we will wait to proceed until we hear back from you. Thank-you, Wes Sampson Wes Sampson Sharratt Design & Company 464 Second Street- Suite 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 Main: 952-470-9750 E-Fax: 952-767-5888 wsamgson(c1sharrattdesign.com www.sharrattdesiqn.com From: Melanie Curtis [mailto:MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 9:18 AM To:'Wes Sampson Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? Wes I don't think I responded to this. Your drawing looks good. It appears that the overhang of the deck/roof meets the intent of the nonencroachment provisions. Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 mcurtisCaci.orono.mn.us From: Wes Sampson [mailto:wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:20 AM To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? Melanie: This is what we are proposing, enclosed a rough section cut and partial elevation. What do you think? From: Melanie Curtis [ma iIto:MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:48 PM To: Wes Sampson Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? The setback is measured to the foundation or wall. From that a 2' roof overhang is allowed to encroach into the setback. A deck would need to meet the required setback, but I'm not exactly sure how what you're describing lays out... any chance you could shoot me a rough elevation/side sketch? Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 �-< mcurtisCaci.orono.mmus From: Wes Sampson [mailto:wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:33 PM To: Melanie Curtis Subject: SYS Encroachment? Melanie: I am working on an addition/remodel and wonder: • Would you would consider a roof deck one story above grade with an integrated gutter/fascia/guardrail applied to the face of the wall below which is just behind the 10' sideyard setback to be an encroachment?This would not protrude much more than 8" from the face of the wall below and the bottom would not be much more than 12" below the top of the roof. Thanks, Wes Sampson Wes Sampson Sharratt Design & Company 464 Second Street- Suite 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 Main: 952-470-9750 E-Fax: 952-767-5888 wsampson(cDsharrattdesign.com 2 m c- z O —D m X U' Z Gll 7 i nO -m m m --- -- - Cp A ]�'. � V (P N I rnrn -- ITI ({ I A (0 I ]C 4'-1 5/8" A) rn 4'-3 5/8" I r4 Q O d 43, \ . ' m �, n N _ _ NA I z lel'-4 3/4" m b Y-4 3/4 2'-4 5'-3 /4 �n I fl rrn 3 X r D - rn m r N r SLOPE I p X 2'-6"x6'- -- - FL. w N ( �1 rn \ -� Q r � D - - "x62"OYE r N � N 2'-6"x -0' 5'-11 1/ 'w N 1 n \ \ w \\ \ 4' / I (2)R \\ z� -n I I 5ENOW W/ NOOK N75 a, a, I I a' ON WALL A O Io-5Pall Tmz - -i 2 -25 I� m Nm � _ Q1 I -2 /8° I p a N D r a (P = I �- a, I �� � � O mmrn• I I I� mNDZ < I ,- +, m I I 0 E I I c = n I N c N I 10'-11" PRE IO I I N I I I � I � IFn 1 ?° I a. Ea. n m �}J}j jz W/ EXISTIN II'-1 " EXT.FACES OF CONC.FDTN. N EXISTING INEW CONSTRUCTION nm -n jjw 12'- " EXT.FACE OF ICF INSULATION 9 S M? a EAT.FACE OF SHEATHING m SCRN "' x 2 PORCH ABOVE r 2 N N• O pl N--1 m 19 '-4" E T.FACE OF CONC.FROM EXT.FACE Z m r n OF E T'G BLOCK WALL,FIELD YE Y m I p D r N � m= « b I � — b I I I I Melanie Curtis From: Lora Pohtilla [Ipohtilla@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:48 PM To: Melanie Curtis; Christine Mattson Cc: wsampson@sharrattdesign.com Subject: 3035 Casco Point Rd, Orono Hello all, Wes Sampson had submitted a survey with a proposed addition for the above address. Wes will not be needing a permit from the MCWD. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Lora Pohtilla District Representative LpohtiIla@minnehahacreek.org Direct:(952)641-4580 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55345 MM * MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED] DISTRICT 1 z Melanie Curtis From: Wes Sampson [wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:20 AM To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? Attachments: 2014-05-13-Hulbert-Roof Deck Edge Elevation-Proposed.pdf; 2014-05-13-Hulbert-Roof Deck Edge Detail-Proposed.pdf 4L.10 (*— Melanie: This is what we are proposing, enclosed a rough section cut and partial elevation.What do you think? From: Melanie Curtis [mailto:MCurtisCai)ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:48 PM To: Wes Sampson Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? The setback is measured to the foundation or wall. From that a 2' roof overhang is allowed to encroach into the setback. A deck would need to meet the required setback, but I'm not exactly sure how what you're describing lays out... any chance you could shoot me a rough elevation/side sketch? Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 � mcurtis(@d.orono.mn.us From: Wes Sampson [ma iIto:wsampson(absharrattdesign.com] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:33 PM To: Melanie Curtis Subject: SYS Encroachment? Melanie: I am working on an addition/remodel and wonder: • Would you would consider a roof deck one story above grade with an integrated gutter/fascia/guardrail applied to the face of the wall below which is just behind the 10' sideyard setback to be an encroachment?This would not protrude much more than 8" from the face of the wall below and the bottom would not be much more than 12" below the top of the roof. Thanks, Wes Sampson Wes Sampson Sharratt Design & Company 464 Second Street-Suite 100 Excelsior, MN 55331 Main: 952-470-9750 E-Fax: 952-767-5888 wsampson(@_sharrattdesign.com www.sharrattdesign.com 1 i i i i i i , 117rn do Dov G1,31or door txt-1130c� 12MaN sus alGIVo >�Daa \ ZIXZ-L4�!il lvioslvd r i AINIVI ------ ------- - i ------ ----)OBGI ma — � I :E :iF\ r --- ---------------------------- City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property roperty Address: b ; 3 S LAS Lo lgKESH4��V Prepared by: t/ Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet (Exampl (Garage) (24' x 30') (720 S.F.) e A Hc�.se b6•S -,&' U. t t -733,-7 S.F. B s t 2 0 S.F. C �, -7. ?,z S.F. D NMAc-4t El�!' C-A, t6.3 Stn , "2- S.F. E 17F-cS.F. F S.F. G " " vL x iz 1 S.F. H 9 x 9 1 S.F. I STE 5 -DEc-Y- (S ?" to) S.F. J t?6,-N;c�" tS x to. `6 'Z S.F. K C0V. C-R ET 6: S.F. L CoN c R C--T E SToo� (3 S.F. M B,Tv.M,NOU.s Dit,%%jF—WAV, S.F. N UEC-K 19'4 t_ K e x t 5 1 -IS S.F. O QErAr +-41tjC, wAL--L— tZo S.F. P RETo,ins t tCr W �,_ So n SO S.F. Q T o rJ U A t_ K-- C Z.49 r-, 3 t S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): 0 jRETA,NWr, tJc,11 /\o+ WNt. W% 7S' 1.,1<4L MO x t t Zv S.F. P 'e SO S.F. Q 1 100 S Jl. o Perv;av-S L joa1 O C S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover Z-7 o S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S S S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 23,6 6 Z- S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) :(4)] 3q (Proposed Hardcover next page) Packet Last Updated: 04/19/2013 Page 14 of 23 T City of Orono Hardcover calculation Worksheet Property Address: 3035 Cob" C., c, A— kzSHoRE` Prepared by: Date: L9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle on �ier ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet (Example) (Garage) 24'x 30' 720 S.F. A 96 C.S yl26. t 1'13S •-I S.F. B S; x tz J(10 S.F. C y.C1 < -?.4 3"i S.F. D (let S x 16.3 Slcs , -- S.F. E - cam Tc� _ S.F. F S.F. G M o,J t✓ --�-�-F�{� S.F. H S.F. S.F. E lZea> '-r62-- ° S.F. K « -V� N - . y.-7 x tCt- S 9Z S.F. L <<<4-e-. Sk 3 3 S.F. M '\s v. t3 'C-1 J L= 3 tt1 n W- var', GI, `-14C.9 S.F. N n 1 S ) 75- S.F. O cy. 1 120,E 120 S.F. P t�;O S.F. Q b x 31 3 S.F. R S.F. S New 5t-a; rS 3.b X. 1 5.3 65. `1 S.F. T Niro A-z' -t- ICS' (J%,I- x ti .8 Z .4 S.F. U %• (m-t 96 's S.F. V �` t�t.s n6.9 13o. 6 S.F. W 6.z x t3. ' 'Lt2. Z S.F. X 5x S ZS S.F. S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 8Z S C S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): O Wa.l\ no-� w`,Vi -15' o� Lak Zt� x 1 2C� S.F. " s6 t SSS S.F. 4 �= t00 S Pertia0 S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover Z'i O S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 -7920 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 23,6 r.Z S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_ (4)] 3 3 % Packet Last Updated: 04/19/2013 Page 15 of 23 � TI CITY OF ORONO 4CALLEDIN DATE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED S - PERMIT NO. .�h� "� COMPLETED ADDRESS t j �n ,_r OWNER TEIEPHONr NO! CONTRACTOR NIf / DESCRIPTION I ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL �_ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ;�FRkMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS (�?RS�ATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ PTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES_NO COMMENTS: cc % No fal,I,�b*&x N-but W amu,` �LkO n r+un W — a ,Ea // o ,� / ✓ W ��41 aK G�y -� c�l�G• ,oaACy� - �o�s +�° yk_ J d W O WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W Cv L BA WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O [I CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY Ci BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. Q (�_— 44 White CopylInspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice D TE� IME r T3-- CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE �j SCHEDULED �- �i�llJ► PERMIT NO. -�/d� OMPLETED ADDRESS OWNER EPHONE N _7e/_15b CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINA ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING R ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ElPLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO COMMENTS: W a Cr J O cc O W cc Q 2 W z W cc J O W D WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED PROJECT COMPLETE cc D CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 00 D CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY C1 BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT D CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN D STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR O CITATION ISSUED D INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. 1 iI ,i Call for the next inspection 24 hours'n adva ) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. White CopylInspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice _/0 5_r AT TIME V/ CITY RONO CALLED IN —�-�y-- INSPECTION OIC SCHEDULED `7'/-!S PERMIT N e�COMPLETED ADDRESS '30 5 OWNER 7MO E NO. '3D�� CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION - ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING h ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS ❑ IN ULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP w ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO COMMENTS: Fv�w, K'� -Gr "/a,r Syale-l" a C45A -6 ,92IFGdtiIra j cc ` ►S .tlp / L��1.�I0f 0-y;t 'oi1c` ° 004OLde-LQ cc Kt 4, 1i!s-! �' k ie si t eb nrrr�e&.kaj /JI I,e^,�f ILt�f =10,14 �6r CY�L�LOP__ ,A !!Vlek/�lyFs. w J 40 f- JV 0.0-11 Alf__ ro✓ d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE ;oc RRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED-CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. 4611 for the next ins ion 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Ownntractor on site: Inspector. White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice w / DATE TIME T CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION IC SCHEDULED f a PERMIT NO. V_&t9g/ COMPLETED ADDRESS OWNER TELEPHONE NO"[ 70/ CONTRACTOR p >; D SCRIPTION G�CdLL� w OOTtNG ❑ PLUMBING FIN ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING 4 ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL 1 ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS Q L1 FRAMING L1 MECHANICAL FINAL El TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO o COMMENTS: LQ C O 0 LQ CC Q Z cc w w GW ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE cc ❑CRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY w O CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V EFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. 0 PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN C CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice ATE V CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTIO TIC l SCHEDULED \,l CY_ PERMIT NO. COMPLETED ADDRESS 3 O 3j QS OWNER V_P-r-z' TELEPHONE NO. z.30'Il CONTRACTOR -t-�'?`C�4- DESCRIPTION FO- ��00TING L1 PLUMBING FIN ElEXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q✓❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKE SH OR ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNEWFIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNEWCONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO COMMENTS: Cr W a 0 �Ili � �' Wg SL` e �' /h���lo✓ � Kc ccLL W CC Q aLQ Poor i10® r�-DiG Cay r�P�S � e S�e�s 1� -Far e vti�d r'� Sa 4¢h s" W J d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED D PROJECT COMPLETE Cr ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector_ White opyilnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 1/ TE , TIME C� CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �% 6 INSPECTIO I SCHEDULED Y � PERMIT NO. "-Bg OMPLETED r ADDRESS 3 CSS Ccs -04-- rC1__ OWNER TELEPHO7 E NO. u(2-7b CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION WOOTING ❑ DE -FIN L [:1 SEPTIC FINAL QElPOURED WALL ❑ PL MBING I ElEXCAV/GRADING/FILLING QElFOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUM G FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP 2 El AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO oy COMMENTS: cc . - a UH ►'t9 NK b �i����"/.yam_ cc 5. - rk civ ec L, Olins AA-b ! 121 LL -4G� eoi O4we✓ i W _ , 2 GI4 r C b ►'e 6MI� a� Q 2 � cSOU '� S►�.d ^F�l�'tK SOi! Q��q/�li' r'epe.� j d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED G PROJECT COMPLETE C' iAQRRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W A OO CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owned ontractor on 6�✓ Inspect . Wh a Copylinspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice `v � 1 DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN , INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. L/ "COS L COMPLETED ADDRESS 3 C OWNER TELEPHONE NO. I G I Z "�C)f -5gQ0 CONTRACTOR Le i I z 1?D( cI r S DESCRIPTION S ������ LAjC - l I-c., ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q El POURED WALL El PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING y ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ PTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES_NO COMMENTS: CC -^ W a J O cc O W 2 Q 2 W W cc O W XWOF K SATISFACTORY:PROCEED E PROJECT COMPLETE cc W RECT WORK&PROCEED E ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O D CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY U BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. E PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR D CITATION ISSUED D INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 ho u in adva ) 49-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice DATE TIME 'CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED _ PERMIT NO.26me-_ Dom, COMPLETED ADDRESS 3� 5,S Cid/ 2d2 OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR __!! DESCRIPTION 4 '� J7o�.«c Die✓ �! 14,0,r 9A�ING E-1PLUMBINGFINAL / LlMAWGRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES—NO Zt oy COMMENTS: or W �d► 4, t%4 p 1` cc O .c��4 W cc Q ` z �o to o ✓��� e 6 k n.�2 A 44 L✓®� W j �dvL� { ✓o !� �G Ll AfORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE cc W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY Cj BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector.� tl White CopylInspector's File Canary CopylSlte Notice pk�efi$ef�� Q w, o �-.---.--------� i is ——— — — QPM - - -- ice; i uu© Ei �� �u _� ERILE W 01�•N.4d'U.4 I _ - — —_ _— _L__ SAw6E r, © _____- ____� --- —� _ ^ �� exsrb wr+� ex5T6 e.R tibg�c_. I SHORING I LOCATIONS-TYPE LA ( I STEPPED FOOTM65 A6 FEaRw 'T 1 — - TO MATCH EAST- SEE DR 36 r21 M=ALTERNA SCALE TE ------- - �.— --_ :.- - E:II'-0' F ase ------- 3 FOOTING B FOUNDATION PLAN 4a 4-0' y -5 'SCALE,I/4'•1'-0' �S STEP F00TIN65 AS RECJ.TRED TO MATCH EXI57IN6.5EE LETAIL ° 561 FOR M"RH WINS STEP. �Y^ � FOOTING SCHEDULE MARK SIZE REINFORCEMENT �. �A 10'X 10'DEEP COM 1-4 CORE. WP ° RERiORLEKK © 56•x 11'DEEP COM. 5EE DETAL 20 © 2'-6'X 7-6'X IO'DEEP 3,-84 X 7-0•EA.MY BOT. ��` of o f �D 60'%11'DEQ W. `$MAL 165 TYPIG.AL r (31 STEPPED FOOTING 51 $GALE:NTS. FOOTING& FOUNDATION PLAN S1 I OP 141% SHORING FOR EXISTING WALL IN SECTION 1/S5: NOTE: CONCRETE WILL BE POURED THROUGH TO FILL VOIDS BEHIND NEW CONCRETE AND CMU WALL. r- - - - I I NON-SHRINK GROUT AT TOP TO MAINTAIN FULL BEARING. USE 4" HIGH #5X2'-6" DOWEL AT BLOCK FOR TOP COURSE 24" O.G. W/ HILTI AS REQUIRED. HIT HY-200 ADHE5IVE (6" EMBED INTO EX15T) 8"x16" SOLID-GROUTED CMU W/#5 VERT/HOOKED POUR PORTION OF DOWEL &#5 HORIZ @ 18" FOOTING AT EACH O.C. PRE-DRILL HOLES SHORING LOCATION FOR HORIZ. REINF. ° d a d d 8 o ° a 5- #5 CONT d° a ° S" 1'4' SE�TOil ctj 5CALE: 3/4" = I'-0" Encompass engineering consultants forensic analysis February 2,2015 Mr. Brad Kvanbek ICF Construction 8008 West Deer Creek Road Minnetrista, MN 55359 Re: Shoring Evaluation 3035 Casco Point Road Orono,MN 55391 Encompass Project 15-5876 Dear Mr. Kvanbek: Encompass, Inc. has reviewed the shoring design for the existing stair wall in the structure located at 3035 Casco Point Road in Orono,Minnesota. Background/Scope: Our evaluation/analysis is limited to the following components: • A shoring design of the existing stair wall to facilitate the work shown in detail 1/S5 of the structural documents issued by A.M. Structural Engineering on 8/18/14. • The provided shoring design is intended for temporary use only. All other structural and architectural components, unless specifically modified to act as part of the stair wall support, are specifically excluded from this analysis. Analysis/Recommendations: • The stair walls are to be supported by CMU piers at the corner, adjacent to the existing structure, and at mid-span on the long side of the stair, as shown in red in the attached plan view. Locate and reinforce as shown in the attached detail. • All other information on sheet S 1 is the work of A.M. Structural Engineering. 14850 Martin Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone 952-854-4511 fax 952-854-3126 3035 Casco Point Road Page 2 2/2/15 This report is prepared based on observations and review of the material available as of this date. Our opinions may be revised based on the availability of additional data. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein represent our professional opinions. These opinions were arrived in accordance with accepted engineering practices at this time and location. No other warranty is implied or intended. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, 01 Anne Crisp, P.E. Project Engineer I I—rccy celdy INs pian,s;'ncitic,. on o;ra t•r me or udCr my difect surlenvision and ?'%'m Li.essd Profmional Engine;.r under the laws of Lw F�innesot3 1112 41, act, Z Licen o R HAUGO b-W1 =4zUV Daily Soil Observation Notes Project No: Date: Report No: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Temp/Weather: Project Manager: Time Arrived: Departed: Areas Observed: ❑ Building Pad ❑House Pad ❑Roadway ❑Parking/Walks ❑ Footing ❑Proof Roll ❑Other(describe): Soil report available? ❑ Yes [:]No Report reviewed? ❑Yes ❑No Report prepared by: Finish floor evaluation: Bottom of footing elevation: Bottom of excavation elevation: Approved plans available? ❑Yes ❑No Specified compaction: Fill source: Oversizing appears adequate? ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No Soils observed agree with Soils report? Dyes ❑No Soils appear adequate for design loads? ❑Yes ❑No Proposed project bearing capacity(psf): Contractor notified of results? Dyes ❑No Name of person notified: Was a copy of this report left on site? Dyes ❑No If so,whom was it submitted to? ` N . 11 , id- Ilk- Notes/Comments: r C. Performed By: Reviewed By: Date: ti This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed.Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendation conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take precedence over,those indicated in a preliminary report. .A City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet s Property Address: WIS �SG® 'P�'. VA Ofo�nc� >MN SS3q t F � `KFSxOaPrepared by: Date: y,Ij IS. Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one(Tier 1 ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 3 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet (Exampl (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) e A A a 7 S.F. B 2 x 5 0 ® S.F. C S.F. D 1 .s g 10,'Z S.F. E «t k 19.Is 92.0 S.F. F -1, Y- 9, a S.F. G L=314' xv= VaLit 469. • S.F. H }, Is ,/'s 7S .° S.F. 1 0. in X 1 120. ° S.F. J vio k\ So 1 So.° S.F. K L4031 HS n 0.6-7 30 •I• S.F. L 1-0.► a I► 2 5 x O,G,7 14's S.F. M o nt A S 313.® S.F. N +e.es 'i x 3 17 ,0 S.F. 0 x 2. s 5 S.F. Pd ' -:o✓� 1?.9 x 17 .6 725.S S.F. Q IIA -1"7. 11 a2,6 S.F. R it " 0,1 x 6.6 l'1-6 . ' S.F. S it " 16.6 x 14.3 ZZ'1 4 S.F. T t. S x 4.z ® S.F. /2t . U rJ+wti 0 A��t�•01� I .3 K q 6S."z S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover 8295,4 0 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): 2 Rt+0.411 7 S ' o 14k e• 2,o 12o• 10S.F. S It Sb x i So . S.F. K 38.S In �. o4 \,a-e! rcV W'.•1,1 K-]S'04 to k .S Yc 0 .61 .s S.F. L Is ln4L.C'�- 1i A..Ar w*%;n ?S` a4- 1., S X o.67 10. 1 S.F. s+ loo .4.4. 160 •a S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 30s,01 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 7 11b 9.s S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 7--S,6 6 2. S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)i(4)] S Z.?7 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Packet Last Updated, 04/99/2013 —:;!Q� WCO poi y- 0 Pang 94 of 9.9 Zpl4-ooq t+ /M -1 ou i 1T Ilion �� ►��► W 1IBM • �/� mss- • - .. � `I ,. fir t y} el lit MIAL � f [ y"f ,• ..1 ,.'mss,•� , .•'�±a / �;f 'M i�j�e � x ]k{ ` � 11 •f• 1 .L l�r� ,, � �x / �. .� , /� •T� I ,�J `\.i I'.v, 1 `I 1 ` 'i - ��j�Y �y4..��, f • 1 ..,,(i"'. SII _ •^ i`�� r � � - Y. X'`•.!'. ' r .' ' Christine Mattson From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Monday, June 29. 2O153:51PyW To: 'Jay Hulbert' Cc: \waooampson@sharnattdeaign.00m'� Adam Edwards-, Christine Mattson; RogerPeitao; Mitch Dietz Subject: FW: 3035 Casco Point Road /#2014-0O981 Attachments: 15359A8_23JUN15.pdf; EX|3T|N8-HARD-COVER'CALC 23JUN15.pdf Hello, Jay. We have received and reviewed the as-built survey for your project (attached). Currently, there are couple concerns of note, specifically the new patio and retaining wall constructed within 75 feet ofthe lake where no hardcover is permitted. The wall and patio were not shown on your proposed plan and should be removed. Retaining walls beyond the 75-foot setback are not counted against your hardcover totals; however the patio will be counted regardless oflocation. Our inspector will be visiting the site to verify the as-built and visually inspect the drainage. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Please contact me if you wish to discuss. � / Thanks, /�� 4 ��� ��, �� �v*���x»*/�Meanie A�It? ' ` ~ Melanie Curtis 2952.249.4627 Z From: Adam Edwards Sent: Thursday, June Z5, 2015 3:47 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Christine Mattson Subject: RE: 3035 Casco Pont Road / #2014-00981 Melanie, 1. | concur with your assessment that there is apatio and retaining wall with inthe 75 'setback. While top and bottom of the wall elevations are not provided, based on the contours it does not appear tobemore than around 1fttall. 2. Drainage pattern depicted appears tobeinkeeping with approved plan. Inspector should confirm the runoff from the addition area runs toward the lake and not toward the southern neighbor. Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Wednesday, June Z4, 20158:57AM To: Adam Edwards Cc: Christine Mattson Subject; FW: 3035 Casco Point Road / #2014-00981 Adam Please review the newsyƒas'bui|tsurvey attached and provide comments, if appropriate, The file, including paper copies of the approved plan, is in your INBOX. I note there is a new, unapproved retaining wall and new patio area within the 75'setback where they should not be located. Thanks. l . . Melanie Curtis 2952.2*9.4627 :�K From: Kurt D. Nelson Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2O1SS:1SPM To: Mitch Dietz; Melanie Curtis Subject: RE: 3035 Casco Point Road / #2014-00981 Hello Melanie, Please find attached a PDF copy of the as-built survey and existing hard cover calculation work sheet for Jay Hulbert, Thanks, l ]�.11%l[ �^��. Nelson ��/soII P.LS. #45356 Hutchinson: (320) 587-2025 VVaconia: (32O) 952'5348 ADDRESS: 99D-5"AVE. SE, SUITE 2 Hutchinson, MN553S0 MW ELM an am IN I G 0"M Ila SO N Is"'311 Professional Land Surveyors 4-1S-11 19,37, The electric data is transmitted for your convenience and is the sole property of E. G. Rud &Sons, Inc. 8yaccepting,the recipient agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend E. G. Rud &Sons, Inc.,from and against any and all damages, liabilities, claims, losses and expenses (including attorney's fees) arising from the use Vfthis data. This electronic data is subject tochange and updates are the responsibility ofthe recipient. E. G. Rud &Sons, |nc, isnot responsible for updating the data or for compatibility with recipient's hardware and/or software. Please check this file for virus contamination prior to use. From: Mitch Dietz Sent:Tuesday,June 23' 2OlS4:39PM To: Kurt D. Nelson Subject: Re: 3035Casco Point Road/#2014-O8981 |fyou sent anemail tothe city you can just mail mine tomysame address isaslast time Sent from myiPhone On Jun 23' 2015' at 3:30 PM, Kurt D. Nelson < wrote: 2 Mitch, Please see attached. Let me know if you'd like to come pick this up and I'll be sure to print off some copies. I'll be out of the office tomorrow, but could leave however many copies you needed for you. Thanks, From: Mitch Dietz [mailto:mitchdietz@gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday,June 17, 2015 10:43 PM To: Kurt D. Nelson Subject: Fwd: 3035 Casco Point Road/#2014-00981 Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Christine Mattson <CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us> Date:June 15, 2015 at 4:32:59 PM CDT To: "'mitchdietz@Rmail.com"' <mitchdietz@gmail.com> Cc: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: 3035 Casco Point Road/#2014-00981 Mitch, We received the as-built survey dated 6/5/2015 for the above noted address. Per our telephone conversation, attached is our hardcover information packet which includes our hardcover calculations sheets. Please have the surveyor completed as-built hardcover calculations and submit to us for our review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono , MN 55356 (physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay ' MN !, 55323-0066 (mailing address) 9 952.249.4620 952.249.4616 cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us www.ci.orono.mn.us Summer Office Hours: (Monday, May 18 through Friday,August 28,2015) Monday-Thursday: 7:30 am to 5 pm Friday: 7:30 am to 11:30 am OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Friday,July 3, 2015 <1 53 5 9AB_2 3 JUN 15.pdf> <EXISTING-HARD-COVER-CALC_23JUN 15.pdf> 3