HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation Reprt qt
825 Willow Drive — Orono, MN
Wetland Delineation Report For:
John Brunello
825 Willow Drive
Orono, MN 55391
arrowhead
environm- - - ental
co n s u I tin
Wetland Consulting Services
Performed by:
Ben Carlson, WDC (#1125)
AEC Project # 2012-069
July 26, 2013
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
1545 Minnie Avenue
Orono, MN 55364
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Overview:
Summary of Project and Results
Report Body:
Introduction 1
Methods 1
Results......... 1
Discussion 2
Data Sources and Literature References 3
Project Figures and Supporting Data:
Figure 1: Map of Project Location(USGS Topo)
Figure 2: Map of Project Location(MN DNR PWI Map)
Figure 3: Hennepin County Soil Survey
Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 5: MCWD Wetland Assessment Map
Figure 6: Wetland Delineation Map(GPS Located)
Field Data Collection Forms(Data Sheets)
Photo Log
1
Project Overview
On November 190', 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a
wetland delineation at the 825 Willow Drive property located in Orono, MN.
• One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds; Wetland 1/IA is a
Shallow Marsh located along the western and northern portion of the property.
• Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMC wetland.
• Wetland 1 is indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public
Water Inventory Map (PWI) as basin 27-140P(French Marsh).
• Wetland 1 is mapped in the Cordova and Houghton hydric soil series.
• Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass, cattail species, and hydrophytic
trees and shrubs.
• The wetland boundary was generally placed along the vegetative transition from
hydrophytic to non-hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in
topography)and where hydrology indicators were present.
1L
Introduction
On November 19`h, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a
wetland delineation at the 825 Willow Drive property located in Orono, MN. The legal
description of the project location is: A part of the NW `/ of Section 10, TI 17N, R23W,
Hennepin County, Orono, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 0.82 acres(according to the
Hennepin County Website).
Methods
AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and
Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Excelsior Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the
Hennepin County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), the National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
Map (Figure 4), and the MCWD Wetland Assessment Map (Figure 5) were reviewed
prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process. The delineated wetland
boundaries (GPS located) are indicated on Figure 6 and are overlaid on a 2012 aerial
image. AEC used the routine delineation method.
Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District;
Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI". The Circular
39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants
was determined using the State of Minnesota— 2012 National Wetlands Plant List Final
Ratings provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory.
Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially;
flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample
points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within
representative upland and wetland locations.
Results
Office Results
Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMC wetland. Wetland 1 is mapped in the
Cordova and Houghton soil series; the Cordova and Houghton soil series are classified as
hydric soils (SCS Hydric Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is indicated on the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI) as basin
27-140P (French Marsh). Wetland 1 is indicated on the MCWD Wetland Assessment
Map as a Preserve Wetland.
Field Results
Wetland 1
AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Shallow Marsh (Type 3, PEMF) wetland. Wetland 1 is
dominated by reed canary grass(Phalaris arundinacea) and cattail(Typha)with scattered
boxelder (Acer negundo) and gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa) along the fringe of the
1
wetland. The adjacent upland area is dominated by manicured lawn consisting of
Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis), yellow foxtail (Setaria pumila), and clover
(Trifolium) species.
The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited rather broad slopes (a mild transition in
topography); in general there was a defined transition between the reed canary grass and
dogwoods (wetland) and the Kentucky bluegrass (upland). The wetland soil boring met
the F3 (Depleted matrix) hydric soil indicator with Geomorphic Position and FAC —
Neutral Test hydrology indicators present. The upland soil borings were lacking hydric
soils and hydrology indicators. In general, the wetland boundary was placed along the
vegetation transition zone.
AEC revisited the site in June of 2013 to review the wetland boundary, the wetland
boundary determined in November of 2012 was determined to be accurate and no
changes were made.
Discussion
One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland
met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic
vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator
or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions.
In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the
Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal).
Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act(WCA)
permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling,
draining,excavating wetlands within your project location.
If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please
feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time(612-237-5996).
Thank you,,
'A� 66
Ben Carlson,WDC
Ecologist/Owner
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
2
Data Sources:
USGS Quadrangle Map—Excelsior 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Minnesota,U.S.A.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin
County 1983 (Revised 1996 data from the Mn DNR Data Deli, online).
Soil Survey of Hennepin County. U.S.D.A. Data obtained from the NRCS/SSURGO
website.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map — Excelsior
Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs).
Aerial Photos were obtained the Land Management Information Center website(2012).
Literature Referenced/Technical Documents:
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg,Mississippi.
U.S.Army Engineer Research and Development Center.2010.Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. US Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station,Vicksburg,Mississippi.
Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of
Minnesota and Wisconsin.US Army Corps of Engineers,St.Paul District.263pp,unclassified.
Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service,Circular 39. 67pp.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31.
103pp.
Midwest 2012 final regional wetland plant list -Lichvar,R.W. 2012.The National Wetland Plant
List. ERDC/CRREL TR-12-11. Hanover, NH: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions
Research and Engineering Laboratory.
USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. 2012. Field indicators of Hydric
Soils in the United States. A guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils,Version 7.0
National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA
Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. Publication Number 1491. 1991.
3
t
riR 'z._
IL
96
1 5
1 f, , •fL • _r .� �� - ' Fox .j
fit ♦ r.-_
16 ILL
1c LLJ. ti 41L. �bber.Hillshy
r
L l-_� , - L tiLw..
IPi ,. • .. rr
�•f .—A
` 1
1 ii.1.1:L.• �l 411. r _r R
.�I e. ,-{111. �,� , .1►sre
1LLiJ.C.. F.
. .SL:r
• l ' i♦
T ll L. L k./ •- ..
.1 yf ■
JL
r
ALL
.0�
OA\Il
if
Map of Project Location
Overlaid cc USGS Topo Map
arrowhead Approximate Parcel Boundary Figure 1
onviT"oI111 ental
Feet 825 Willow Drive
[' O CI s 11 I 1 11 � 0 250 500 1.004 Orono.MN
Unnamed {27-862 W)
U ed {27-8591WI
7 -_
` YY ii
" French Marsh (27-140 P)
epi
m
.a �
French Marsh (27-140 P)
Unnamed (Pond A)(27-864 W)
1
French Marsh (27-140 P)
Map of Project Location
Overlaid on MN DNR PW Map
arrowhead Q Approximate Parcel Boundary Revised Inventory Figure 2
environmental I Feet 825 Willow Drive
l' t.1 t 1 t l l t l Iln 0 260 500 1,000 Orono.MN
9f 1
!fN�,rop
a Y-•y +1�y�+! ye` it
N�
+v
y
k*M �a\ ~,yam�ji6�i 97' ,�..«.� «+, .'*�'u, �"#"a a7" �� 3-,t � •
y t s ,�
+Psi :a • 1� 4 "
� � ,fit � +Jaw"1"�"•"` >. �/w d
}
;W
a � f
✓�fi.it_wi^�..,eir�'-T ".+► t+.. „M�!r ,�+ ¢ r � a ` >'• ���'..l�"F..
Alf
AO
w✓!�"f
«
•• 6-4 •.� a T • r a ,,.�y o 1 +p' >' t`..p "«etbW—
jl ijt •+ � .
a f„, � 1j w h�♦ !�
j�c'a'y �"'h i �' i ri;�'*i ,y, �� # v' �y• #'�'t C'a, 9" ���x 1"�y
�ey
�..W. 'l WLR/p7r i t *rr ilt 3 f, 7idr��A'I�M� �t,yrd
41,
��*;f •' . •y 1 �, ,,, r.s Y ;tigaiwP # a�`. °'�! ick
{#L' v # .0.! .Y ♦. �, :.y/, 1 � ,pf'�y M y'�* A 'tr tl'4� � +
� *�! `� � �� it � tt • v Ek✓ Y � ✓'� w n
}. a
1xk
4� gra'�iR'y^�i n1'•y 4.z - ', ! '� �"��} .. '«s`�"~a y Mg�.*
ur
.�,*�•.•�• x � ,;xfi SSM'. q � o-- �;&
`* '¢;C fie+Y � #',�� r� � r� � m b '�� "• a�` y:,�
i��$ � ��"' �'# Mari, 4 �i C.s9# r' : � •'�y�5 )
'"''j+� �'rc`.i . .., �.i a k� ��N w" ��A a,.. t'.,a .. »' led4' � ,'�l•+4.� �.
v
^"." .!✓ r"'S.�:5,i' i���:a#i•,tea t.', �� ;*h, �' n T� - i*`
y
e:}'>!of .«i,'�•"s I i � r ... LY a +a� `�� �, _. �j�f e^ '� «
" y
F �
a p
,. ..,- .:...iM4 r`z fid• * 0 ! t 9
' k
a•. z t. +r t 1 x .,,r #,3 6.: *`. ,i ...n sLiv Y ,::. A!' ILA" .m..
0 „
r
ot
Ir
10
-44
14
AOO
,
.. .. 1�J-ti�Imo• rv, �nFF "'+iPe i"sN '11�."6,
s
J
a
• � y� � ���� - t � �� �� t tJtZ1L1.7
., � • F � ��, E x�., .+ � �'° # a to M.
a o
,
y a l a
e/II q
1i
t
i e
• #
a
� w
� +fi
F
•
1
.�
, Fy+
001,
V.010 4f
Xj
00
,� • .
w . �
JJa t
` OVf.s s�►��t 1 '! sI 1001. 40� till
! ` { j✓ / /
/'
y}
r / ' *�
0 Of
".,s
a ;
,.
itWW
old
IFF
At
OVA
, i
• Mira
of
y . �
49
OF
i # k
tea' :v'r,. � � +� � ;� ,�.„ ��'X'`� ,►�
• A
a r
r �
Y+a�
�J '., ��i�F � i Af � �aaa � �y� Ir�y,,'`'*"a�•� ¢!'`xw � 'f �v � '�:� * ,Y.� � �� ,�...{
v
� 4
a
INV
Jf
aldi-
hep r �
e-7 IF �wA
•.a
49
� t
o-
tilt
wr
AV
PR
w +
o ^
.
40
ok-
F
' 44,
..
�Y
• `� "` .r ��.,,�� ��1 5w �,�,�,, ' � „ ,,, ,,,. - '.s,,-. it �. � w
{�i • y* ► r a#' " t 'fin
1111 m � � �� � } • �-:� � �^ *�� µ P '� �®® - d �`'���^..'"y�, ,
14
It w
��� �}•'fit,.*� ��`��'�4`f� �i�� �,., �� ., � `� R
r.
0 0
� 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Ske 825 Willow Drive City/County: Oronokfennepin Sampling Date: 11119/2012
Applicant/Owner: John Brunello State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet
Investigator(s):BPC(VVDC#1125) ection,Township,Range: NW 114 Sec.10,T117N,R23VV
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin ocal relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Cordova(Hydric) dtM Classification: PEMC
Are climaticJhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year' Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled all ea within a wetland? Y
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute t Indicator Dominance Test Wor ksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' } %Cover Species Staus Species that are OBL,
1 • • • FACVV,or FAC: 2 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B)
4 Species that are OBL,
5 FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (AAB)
0 =Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub stratus (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Cornus racemose 10 • Y • FAC • Total%Cover of:
2 OBL species 70 x1 = 70
3 FACW species 10 x 2= 20
4 FAC species 10 x3= 30
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plat size: 5' ) Column totals 90 (A) 120 (B)
1 Ca/amagrostis canadensis 60 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.33
2 Pha/arts arundinacea 10 N FACW
3 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL Hydr ophytie Vegetation hidicator s:
4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
6 X Prevalence index is 93.0`
7 Morphogical adaptations`(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 _separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation"
80 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 be present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydi ophytie
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL Sar"P&W Pant: 1-1 wet
Profile Description: )Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moat) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 512 80 7.5YR 416 20 C PLAN Sandy clay loam
*Type:C-Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS-Masked Sand Grains. '"Location:PL=Pae Lining,M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Nndicatorsfor Problematic Hydric Soils:
Fist isol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(Al 6)(LRR K,1,R)
—_Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(SS) _Dark Surface(Sl)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) ^Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L.R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) -Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Iron-Marganese Masses(F12)(LRR K.L,R)
_Stratified Layers(A5) ^Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2)
2 cm Muck(Al 0) X Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
^_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) —
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) —_Depicted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and weltand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer 411 observed):
Type: HydFk sod present? Y
Depth(hchesx
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland"ology Indicators:
Primary Indicators[minimum of one is rem*ed check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_Surface water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Sol Cracks(86)
_high water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
__water Marks(B1) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —_Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) X Rods(0) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) 'Presence of Reduced Ion(C4) Stated or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) —Recent Ion Reduction in Tiled Sols X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Ion Deposits(BS) (C6) _-R-FAC-Neutral Test(DS)
_hu ndation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Thin Murk Surface(C7)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Gauge or Vel Data(D9)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations: —
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(names): indicators of
Water table preset? Yes No X Depth(inches): wetland hydrology
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Site 825 Willow Drive City/County: OronoJHennepin Sampling Date: 11119/2012
ApplicarMwner: John Brunello State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up
Investigator(s):BPC(WDC#1125) ection,Township,Range: NW 1/4 Sec.10,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope ocal relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Cordova(Hydric) M Classification: None
Are climaticfiydrologic conditions of the sde typical for this time of the year' Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute t Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species Staus Species that are OBL,
1 • • • FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B)
4 Species that are OBL,
5 FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (AM)
0 =Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub stratui (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 • • • Total%Cover of:
2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
3 FACW species 0 x2= 0
4 FAC species 90 x3= 270
5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40
0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 100 (A) 310 (B)
1 Poe pratensis 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.10
2 Setaria pumila 10 N FAC
3 E/ymus repens 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicatoi s:
4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is}50%
6 _Prevalence index is 53.0"
7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 _separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
100 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 be present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydi ophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Manicured lawn
SOIL SarnpingPoinb 1-1 up
Profile DestripWM (Descr"to the depth needed to document the imlicator or confirm the absence of imitators.)
Depth matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc"" Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 312 100 Cloy lam
14-18 10YR 514 95 7.5YR 5A 5 C M Sandy day loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. "Location:PL=Pore Lam,M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic hydric Soils:
_Hustled(Al) Sandy Greyed Metrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_Wstie Epipedon(A2) ^Sandy Redox(SS) Dark Surface(ST)(LRR K,L)
_Black Hatic(A3) ^Stripped Matra(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) ^_Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K.L,R)
Stratified Layers(AS) —
Loamy Greyed Matra(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
�2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)_Redox Dark Surface(F6)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophyticc vegetation and wetand
^Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? N
Depth(hchesk
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:(minimum of one is reauired:check all that awly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_High Water Table(A2) —True Aquatic Plants(B14) ^Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ^Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living ^—Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Roots(0) Saturation Visite on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ^Stunted or Stressed Plorts(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) ^Recent Iron Reduction In Tied Solis —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(BS) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS)
'h ndation Visible of Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ~'
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Wei Data(D9)
_Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inchesX Indicators of
Water table present? Yes No X Depth(Inches wetland hydrology
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Present? N
(mss capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring wen,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Site 825 Willow Drive CityiCounty: OronoAiennepin Sampling Date: 1111912012
ApplicarWwner: John Brunello State: MN Sampling Point: 1 A-1 Wet
Investigator(s):BPC OMC#1125) ection,Township,Range: NW 1/4 Sec.10,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin ocal relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 1 Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Houghton(Hydric) 4M Classification: PEMC
Are climaticYhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year' Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation sal or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled ai ea within a wetland? Y
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute t Indicator Dominance Test WoikSheet
Tree Stratum (Plat size: 30' ) %Cover Species Staus Species that are OBL,
1 sank nigra 40 • Y • OBL • FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B)
4 Species that are OBL,
5 FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A)B)
40 =Total Cover
Saplina/'Shrub stratus (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence 61clex WOlksheet
1 Cornus racemosa 30 • Y • FAC • Total%Cover of:
2 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC OBL species 40 x1 = 40
3 FACW species 0 x2= 0
4 FAC species 50 x3= 150
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
50 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 90 (A) 190 (B)
1 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.11
2
3 Hyde ophytic Vegetation Inclicatoi s:
4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
6 X Prevalence index is s3.0'
7 Mar ho ical adaptations*p g pt (provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 _separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation"
0 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 9ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 be present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hyde ophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL SanW&V Potts: 1 A-1 wet
Profile Deseription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the kwilcator or cotsirm the absence of inilicators.)
Depth M&K Redox Features
(inches) Color(mast) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks
0-16 1 OYR 5r2 1 60 7.6YR 416 20 C M Sandy day loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D-Depletion,RM-Reduced Matrix,MS-Masked Sand Grains. "Location:PL=Pore Lining,M-Matrix
Hydric Soil Indieators: bm icators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
_hlstisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prakle Redox(Al 6)(LRR K,L,R)
_Fistic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) gipped Metrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Ped(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
^_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ^—Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) ~ion-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Stratified Layers(AS) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ~Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(Al 0) X Depleted Matrix(F3) ^Other(explain in remarks)
^Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)^Redox Dark Surface(F6)
Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) ^Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetand
^Sandy Murky Mineral(S1) ^_Redox Depressions(FB) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer(it observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? Y
Depth(inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators fminirmn of one is realrect check all that awls) Secondary indicators(minimum of two reauired)
Surface wrier(Al) Aqu clic Fauna(013) Surface Sal Cracks(B6)
-_High wrier Table(A2) —_True Aquatic Plants(B14) —_Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) _hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Tables(C2)
�wder Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhaospheres on Living —Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Roots(C3) 'Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iran(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
—Drift
Met or Crust(84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Sols X Geomorphic Position(D2)
—Iron Deposits(BS) (C6) XFAC-Neulyd Test(DS)
hundation Visine on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muds Surface(C7)
—'Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) ^Gauge or well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(89) ^—Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(fiches): b"Neators of
wrier table present? Yes No XDepth(fiches): wetland hydrology
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(fiches): presets? Y
(Includes cry fry)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Site 825 Willow Drive CitylCounty: OronoJHennepin Sampling Date: 11119/2012
ApplicarMwner: John Brunello State: MN Sampling Point: 1 A-1 Up
Investigator(s):BPC WC#1125) ection,Township,Range: WV 114 Sec.10,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope ocal relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Cordova(Hydric) M Classification: None
Are climaticJhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year' Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation ,soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled ar ea within a wetland? N
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute t Indicator Dominance Test Wor ksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species Staus Species that are OBL,
1 FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B)
4 Species that are OBL,
5 FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (AB)
0 =Total Cover
SaplinalShrub stratul (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Total%Cover of:
2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
3 FACWN species 0 x 2= 0
4 FAC species 100 x3= 300
5 FACU species 10 x4= 40
0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 X5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 110 (A) 340 (B)
1 Poe pratensis 60 Y FAC Prevalence Index=BIA= 3.09
2 Setaria pumila 40 Y FAC
3 Trifoliumpratense 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
6 _Prevalence index is 93.0"
7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 _separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation`
110 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 be present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydr ophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Manicured lawn
SOIL Sampling Point: 1A-1 Up
Profile DeecrilMon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR U2 I 100 Loam
4-16 10YR 4/2 55 10YR 416 5 C M Clay loam Fil material
4-16 10YR 212 40 Fl material
16-26 10YR 7f2 100 Sand
'Type:C-Concentration,D-Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS-Masked Sand Grains. "Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix
Hydric Sol indicators: indicators for Problematic HydFic Sols:
Histisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Metric(S4) Coes!Prairie Redox(Al 6)(LRR K,L,R)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ~Sandy Redox(S5) —Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
_Black Hissic(A3) ~Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ^Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) �Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Stratified Layers(A5) ^Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2)
2 cm Muck(Al 0) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
^_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1)^Redox Dark Surface(F6)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) ^Depleted Dark Surface(F7) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric sol present? N
Depth(fix
Remarks:
Mixed soils, likely fill material (not recent). Chunks of glass and debris in soil
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Primary Indicators lmninum of one is rem ed:check all that an*0 Secondary Indicators(minknum of two reaired)
Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Farm(B13) Surface Sol Cracks(B6)
_High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 'Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living —'Crayfish Burrows(CO)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) Roars(0) ^Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) ^Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Met or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction In Tiled Soil Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) —'FAC-Neutral Teat(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ^Thin Muds Surface(C7) —'
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) ^Gouge or Wel Data(D9)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Fifield Observations:
'Surface water present? Yes No X ;Depth(inches): indicators of
Water table present? Yes No X Depth(irkchesy wetland hydrology
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches} Present? N
(includes Capillary fry) T
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
p
tys
/f
f � a
'•P � K. ,°`���;� r.?�a�1 " Y.s� Y"'C';P to +i� ��L. �. ''
of. 411
r. �,.tsY„r►a.,� y,� ' 'ir.,y �,�ry ;,' '��S4
OK
a
l•`^!\ �,...� >�a� 6� *�.?'� s �� d•6, ����j M1 n r� I �' .y �L”' ,�\ w
' ti w�"' ' tf wrM" ay�� t'" r`• a @ * '; t k Vis 'h.
Vii { t �, •`.E i Ill's P �p r,
f v" �`''�,'x'11�• � +�� 1 � k.� ���P� � ''�� �� �' �a �.
oil • '• • 1 11 • • • ' •