The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012 - 00424 - sport court III 1 11111111111111111111 CITY OF ORONO * 2012 - 00424 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 04/25/2013 ORONO,MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 REPRINTED ON 4/25/2013 ADDRESS : 950 WILLOW VIEW DR PIN : 28-118-23-44-0017 LEGAL DESC : WILLOW VIEW : LOT 006 BLOCK 003 PERMIT TYPE : ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : SPORTS COURT ACTIVITY : 329-STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDINGS VALUATION : $ 16,000.00 NOTE: SPORT COURT APPLICANTS SHALL SUBMIT AN AS-BUILT SURVEY REFLECTING CONFORMANCE WITH H APPROVED PLANS,MEETING CITY SURVEY STANDARDS,FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ESCROW RELEASE. APPLICANTS SHALL ENTER INTO AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY AD RESSING THE FIRE PIT LOCATION WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT UPON ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT. APPLICANTS SHALL RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF THE FIRE PIT LOCATION WITH THE MCWD. APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 280.25 KANIVE,JUSTIN&ALYSSA STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 8.00 950 WILLOW VIEW DR LONG LAKE,MN 55356- TOTAL 288.25 PAID WITH CC# 5367 OWNER KANIVE,JUSTIN&ALYSSA 950 WILLOW VIEW DR LONG LAKE, MN 55356- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested i conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked. - y time for due cause. 110 ,,&/.1A /c2(.0/ Cy( / 9-10/ App i•.f't Permitee Signature Date Iss ;. By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. a 0_4104 !oh7/, y City of Orono Building Permit Application for New Structures or Additions ��8- a S MailingAddress: 7,0,� PO Box 66 Pemtit number oZ0 —OC el JNI71- O Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: 5.- I�7 3 -, ;.\ 'Y r a, Street Address:' Received by: ► ` Is ''''41A. ti 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: Z rsr �o Orono, MN 55356 C2 0 / _ 7 Hoo 60 Total Fee: j Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. 2.60o 13S� Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) ttii�� GENERAL INFORMATION: � 20(L'00`� Job Site Address: 95o 1�t t\R W V i-2�) 1brlve� Of0n0 �� 5 , La Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? E Yes tic No If yes,a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: A ty ssc. KoAxve,, State License# Expiration Date: Phone: q57.- 4 2 - q 07C_ . _. . a r-, ',, , i (cell) Mailing Address: c0 U 11Quu Ui23,,3 ur -ZI ,, 2 ZIP: 553 rj(o Contact Person: Aly& KO,Y�U.p, 3 l-7 ne (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: G. Kam iv-e ea m 01 11 I„jdr,,,,a f2rta if( a -K1 / PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: �VL! Un3/u0`� 'SL -\r C018 (31\\11, Phone (day): 92-4 Z(1-LI 0-7 0 CC Address: q 5a ( i 1kow U 1 Dr ZIP: 5 rj 5 l0 Email and/or Fax Ok.KO"'t\P 0 me hS ` ARCHITECT/ENGINEER INFORMATION; Jh I l Irtouv9- 4125-"`' Name: t'S-V 1T1, ZW Oar-1- 01 s q� I�,�' ,n/�/ �y� ��-� Phone (day): Ct1 Z-�O -FUU 4 l�al.� Vy fj �.�✓ir�' ' � Address: 13Q t CU `{ SL ZIP: 65 33`i Email and/or Fax: {Sevin Q Sport ‘41— CNA iy,, �L�J u�, v PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Type of Project 2. Propos__ ___ -_ Sewage Disposal & Water Supply ❑ New Construction El Single Family with 0 Residence ❑Addition attached garage 0 Garage/Accessory Bldg. Public Sewer ❑Accessory Building 0 Single Family with 0 Deck 0 Relocation detached garage 0 Office/Commercial 0 Private Sewer sz Other: (specify) pori' Court- 0 Multiple Family/Condo 0 Warehouse 0 Public 0 Storage X Public Water ""Any earth movement may require 0 Commercial M Other(specify) MCWD review&permits. 0 IndustrialSport- GAur4- 0 Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) Other: (specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd ,r,*. CD u - Deephaven, MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minneha hacreek.orq Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ 1 (0)000 Packet Last Updated: 03-06-2012 -21 - STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1. Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2. Type of Construction a. Length (ft.)= 7 Number of bedrooms= ❑Wood/Frame b. Width (ft.)= 21 Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry Areas in square feet Attached= ❑ Metal ❑ Pole Bldg. c. Basement= Detached= 0 ICF d. 1st Story = ❑On-site Prefab e. 2nd Story= ❑Off-site Prefab e f. %Story = N Other(please specify)S(�pri coLr l g.Total Area= 1 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable 1� 0 Permit Application ❑ 0 Proposed Building Plans ❑ 1� MN State Energy Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Requirements Form 0 Survey(meeting all requirements) ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ 31 Hardcover Calculation(s) ❑ Septic System Site Evaluation Report ❑ 1� Access Permit ❑ 1: Wetland Buffer Improvement Plan ❑ Engineered Plans for Retaining Walls 4 feet or above 0 Plan Review Fee ❑ 0 Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information, the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. • Applicant's Signature: "1,) (7 Date: 5— / 7 J. Owner's Signature: -�4. -4 !#1► '6 Date: Packet Last Updated: 03-06-2' -22 - DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. Alusno_. 7- Kan i First Middle Last L611100 i'ewriUe_J Address () conn Mkt 55 595Z-c1ZA- 94-0 City State Zip Phone I under and my rights as stated abov: 411'e"J' Signature Packet Last Updated: 03-06-2012 - 19- Plan Review Checklistnf� /orp �N� �)New Structures / Additions Address/ PID/ Legal: q 5 \'\/ 1 1'00\A) V lw . Description of work: 5iM-V- C CC,'t{li ( 2"1 1`5- I Septic review by: '-e r Date Approved: 5 -("' ( 2-� Zoning review by: . - Date Approved: ID—oq---17.--- Building review by: Date Approved: Grading review by: J'" Date Approved: it/i// A Zoning File#: Ni PC- Resolution#: NJ Pr Resolution Date: fr.!! Zoning District _, Fire Department Post Office School District b ' .--1r \, Zoning: Lbt Area: SF/AC Width: E 75Depth: 2134 5 i iU Survey Submitted: ❑ s ❑ No Date of Survey: -5 3 305 I C — Proposed Setbacks: �01 f Z, rout Lake) ear~ et) oNSEW ) ( NSEW ) Other Buildings Wetland Side Ide S l''i( 1 90 ' 2-0 1 I i .2 I I4-' (iifki ) Building Defined Height: Building Peak Height: #of Stories Ok?: 0 YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: START WITH the distance between the basement floor/crawl START the distance between the slab and the highest space floor and the highest roof peak, the top of WITH roof peak,the top of the cornice of a flat roof, the cornice of a flat roof,the deck line of a the deck line of a mansard roof, or the mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round uppermost point on a round or other arch-type or other arch-type roof roof SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window and SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window highest roof peak of a pitched roof and highest roof peak of a pitched roof SUBTRACT the distance between the basement floor/crawl ADD the distance between the slab and the highest space floor and the highest existing grade within existing grade within the foundation the foundation or 10 feet,whichever is less. EQUALS Defined building height • EQUALS Defined building height Lot Coverage: SF % Shoreland District MCWD Permit Received Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A ❑ Yes 0 Yes No 0 Yes 0 No A - Permit Number: Setback: Hardcover Zones Existing Proposed Variance Requir CUP Required/ 0-75' 0 Yes No 0 Yes /KNO 75-250' ` - Type(s): Type(s): ✓✓✓ 250-500' N\ 500-1000' -/-,�U / �,�jjj 4 REMARKS (in-house): 1 h = 4�Gy GsI / ' - tiC�e APF. l Y rq-Cei,Gt± iAV tt.0i frf�,o-I \:�/=°!f.� ft-e(�%3_�lUpdated: 09/'9'1/ 09 011%/ '0—"L z:\forms\plan review checklist.docx Fees to be Charged YES NO Permit Plan Review State';Surcharge Investigation Fee SAC-=:Number of SAC Units Sewer Connection Water Connection Park Fee Site-Inspection Other(specify) Miscellaneous Fees Calculated By: Square Footage $ per Square Footage Basement X = $ 1St Floor X = $ 2nd Floor X = $ Garage X = $ Estimated Construction Value: $ tc Orono Inspections Required (Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits O Site 0 Plumbing 0 Grading / Filling 0 Well O Hardcover Removal 0 Mechanical 0 Fire 0 Electrical X Footing 0 Septic 0 Water Connection O Poured Wall 0 Fireplace 0 Sewer Connection O Foundation Survey 0 Masonry 0 Lawn Irrigation O Radon Rock Bed 0 Mfg. O Framing 0 Other(specify) ❑ nsulation As-Built Survey 7 final O Other(specify) REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access:Existing: 0 YES 0 NO New: 0 YES 0 NO REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED BY PERSON PULLING PERMLT) 'Vita) ID ap1nSvecd tuti 'ttac9-1 de(il�t. 7d /ak a- - j 1-e t I'llit -e v4 o-l-cJ • ) 414 a d, 1- -tic)n‘rtl' -11, --111,--e //o ' c. L ui vv /( (‘i chi I I-wt)d 6K-- ( lid- l' i- COY L' iNiw fy-; <Je-- /.cam- - 1� �'C> Updated: 09/11/2009-) il teLf-y,/�.�e�-^^ " z.\forsns • -• iew checklist.dook g- ,i ►l t 6 di Gf s i:-,-.r jl�Le. k.,_t•-, c?-t C�I2 L c-L I' , Ev Y-�' e f-(f c D,- 6a eF-ei-'-U/Lf.0._'4 t,) a f[SK lam'rC'iJj�l e;< lr,2,l . Jesse Struve ORONO COPY From: Jesse Struve Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:58 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Christine Mattson Subject: 20121011 950 Willow View Dr-2012-00423 Melanie, I have reviewed the permit application and will sign the permit, but I have concerns regarding the property: 1. The survey does not address 2 of 3 of my comments from September 14. No erosion control was ever shown on the survey, and the top and bottom elevations of the propose retaining wall was not shown. It appears the wall will be under 4' in height, but if the wall exceeds 4' the applicant will need to submit engineered plans and specifications signed by a registered professional engineer. 2. The survey does not accurately reflect the site conditions. There is an existing patio and fire pit (see attached photo)which is not shown on the survey). Both of these things need to be included in the as-built survey. Furthermore the fire pit may be located within the drainage and utility easement or within the wetland delineation boundary or buffer area for the wetland. There are no records of a permit being pulled for either the patio or the fire pit, but there is aerial photographic evidence both were installed sometime between 2009 and present. If a permit was obtained through the City, it would not have been allowed to be installed within the utility and drainage easement or within the delineated boundary of a wetland. If the fire pit falls within the 2012 delineated wetland boundary, it will be required to be removed from the wetland and relocated outside of the drainage and utility easement. If it is only located within the drainage and utility easement the City will allow it to remain in place with the understanding if grading or utility work is needed in this area,the homeowner is required to remove the fire pit out of the easement area. All costs associated with this work is the responsibility of the homeowner. Prior to the release of the escrow,the applicant will need to provide an accurate as-built of the entire site including the location of the fire pit. If the fire pit is located within the delineated wetland boundary,the fire pit will need to be removed prior to the release of the escrow amount. If the fire pit is only located within the drainage and utility easement,the applicant will need to obtain an easement encroachment permit with the City prior to release of the escrow. Please contact me with any additional questions you may have. Jesse Struve, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Orono (952) 249-4661- Direct (952) 249-4616- Fax www.ci.orono.mn.us 1 OI3ONO COPY EXCAVATION CALCULATIONS FOR JUSTIN&ALYSSA KANIVE IN LOT 6,BLOCK 3,WILLOW VIEW October 8,2012 CUT AREA DEPTH AREA(SF) VOL(CF) 0' 900 > 816 = 30 C.Y. 1.7' 60 Additional cut for sport court materials. 37' X 27' X 0.33' = 330 C.F. = 12 C.Y. Total = 42 C.Y. GRONBERG di ASSOCIATES.INC. 445 N.WILLOW DR RECEIVED LONG LAKE,MN 55356 OCT 0b 2012 CITY OF OHONO • 50 (1031.9) cam- t-o� S 88° 17' 08" E (1030.4),! (1028.8) (1027.4) (1026.6) i N. to 1—> \ I /' I 132 .94 L _. `n ------' i \.__ 2 00 — 11 i \...,(:__1029.6) i S X4°46' 06" W // \ (1028.6) \ 17.26 , \ 11 10 _} 30-� :r •••• .\_15 SIDE SETBACK'N71 r. \ I1 I — 1-8-. �.0 4 \�\ \\ I // kl— i \‘,.. \ \ \ . 1 / ; \ (1027.6) \� H r (1028.,)1 Tr v / /� (1035.0 E \ `, ` i J. ki°\ 1 < r / (1035.6) 246 � ' PROPO.QD ' ^ OS\ /I / to�s_ 1ii. SPORT'COURT O \ 1----I -`5,,. / / GARAGE I J-\(1 L w / / °° FLOOR=03 ) N I�' . 1028.]I �:. / V. o � 1 �_ 1� 1 I I 20 7;194:1 \ v. (1032.7) 3 it I ) BLACKTOP i. (1028.3) DRIVEWAY - I \ p 13.5 PORCH 1 I / P I 1----41033.1 1 EXISTING 4.0 III11111Ias.oco DECK EX (1026.6) �. I m HOUSE rw II i II m #950 1 'oma I I I 1.1 LOWER 1 HI I II > 6.0 FLOOR=) II V ` ! I 1 \ // I I 4.0 1 o (1028.5) / I 1\ 7.0 TA' L 1�" I I PORCH o I I 24.4 I I (1029.1) 1 (1027.0) I / 3i y \� 1 ' 11 trj (1033.7) , i I m 0I 1 C's i (AI �� I N �c 1 ! \ / I I \ / I '/ i \ /I� i I? / 1 I I -Z O G:1 o eou� aies rerson: }K�,, n Construction Profile Game Courts, BB, Tennis & Putting Greens Name..'54y c(1A \ 15 sc„ uRONO COPY v L Address: City: /ro Home Phone#. s.� '%2 7 0 - Work Phone#: Directions to Site: Size of Pad: c77V07 Sleeves to be placed: 1400F' yle i- Ate • ❑ Court to be squared off: house fence other EDCourt has been staked or painted and squared. RECEIVED ElCourt has been approved by customer. OCT -8 2012 CITY OF ORONO *Note house location on side of court (2 LA.../2 tccc fSi /F �� N. ce. 6 Q/ C'-' Y )'O �jG n ce-e,k f '`GDS fA'S 11 e iv '/l cGxcc '`'''`I ✓� �� r'f'. x 3 I, fly' de b se- 0-4- C%ss 3- fi.e.2- le) I/we agree to the above courout. -- 37 Customer Signature: Date: I I A illicit 1 II 7.. 1 ,., ... . r.„,t,# , tnn DaE-- I-°—)1F. . E l ,• o1 it - -,...".",. lilt, 1 t; 9 4011114111‘ •-,-,, • 1 crA:h ...„.,...,_ ti 1 x5 t t. e . as Vw p new IMYp suoi�nai) 1ainie\ ,g - Ag pauElsaa J v CJ rTh I o o ;, :tom1 1 0 " •i 1 o a a 0NI. � d I 0A )--7 42.--_ '" 1 :2 . I p,. 'z ..r.. 't i 1 s i . I .--- I _ : -az; : .iirmit,r, I -':,- 1.17J0,1 •w,erl i U22.175 ��,� • I 14$4444"." * '14° etigittittil 0 •< aDuapisa� Qa 0 0 4,0 • : I • tal I " 000 4TH' ., • I et � I T . t I19N 1� '� ` I• I ,' '--N, i f " /( //9\ or' ,� BO L_TON & M N K , I N C® p Z Consulting Engineers & Surveyors �\ '� 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200•Chaska, MN 55318-1172 \ r Phone(952)448-8838• Fax(952)448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com September 19, 2012 City of Orono Attn: Christine Mattson PO Box 66 Orono, Mn 55323 RE: Wetland Delineation/Permit#2012-00424 950 Willow View Drive Dear Christine: As requested, we have reviewed the Vegetation Management Plan for 950 Willow View Drive. We offer the following observations, comments and recommendations for your consideration. 1. The Vegetation Management Plan received on September 19, 2012 is acceptable as proposed. 2. The buffer management plan does not indicate a timeline for vegetation establishment. A minimum of 3 years should be anticipated for the proper establishment of the buffer. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Mark L. Perry, WDC Natural Resources Specialist Cc: David Martini, Bolton&Menk Robert Bean, Bolton & Menk 4 - Vegetation Management Plan The following is the proposed vegetation management plan for the wetland buffer at 950 Willow View Drive, Orono,MN Project Goals & Objectives The goal of the project is to remove the areas of manicured lawn dominated by Kentucky blue grass so as to provide a natural wetlands buffer free from invasive plants. Site Preparation • Areas of manicured lawn dominated by Kentucky blue grass will be removed through spray treatment of Roundup Originalmax in specified area. The site will be prepared by agitating and loosening the soil to a minimum depth of 3 inches for seeding in the buffer area. • Areas of invasive or exotic species, such as Canadian thistle will be spot sprayed using Roundup Originalmax herbicide as per manufacturer's directions. • Site preparation and seeding to be completed by the end of September 2012. Seed Mixes and Plant Materials • MnDOT seed mix 350 will be used to seed the buffer area as this seed mix is recommended for upland buffer areas. • Seed will be applied either by drop seeding or broadcast seeding. Timing of seeding and other planting activities identified Vegetation Maintenance& Schedule of Activities • Re-seeding and over-seeding to occur early each spring and late fall until full sustainable natural buffer has taken root • Annual removal of invasive plants and spot treatment of invasive species to occur annually or as more or less frequently as recommended by Prairie Restoration, Inc. or such other qualified firm. Sev'tI- Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:59 AM To: 'Alyssa Kanive' Cc: 'Mark' Subject: 950 Willow View Dr-2012-00424 Alyssa, Our engineer reviewed the survey dated 8-27-12. His comments are included below. We need the survey to be revised to reflect the wetland edge as determined by Arrowhead Environmental on June 25, 2012. The 16.5' buffer and the 20' structure setback should be added. The other comments from our engineer should be addressed also. I sent your vegetative buffer plan to our wetland specialist for approval. We will review your permit request based on the revised survey with the above information. Wetland delineation approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is required before the wetland buffer escrow is returned, if approval is not received prior to our permit issuance. If the MCWD makes changes to the delineated edge,the changes will also need to be made on your property and on the survey before the wetland buffer escrow is returned. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Christine— I have reviewed the permit for the proposed sport court and have the following comments: • The survey shows the wetland edge and buffer area "as shown on grading plan dated 4-7-00". I am fine with the wetland boundary shown like this, but the buffer edge seems to have changed since 00 and should be reflective on the survey. They should show where the edge of the mowed grass and compare it to where the buffer was shown in 2000. • The proposed retaining wall needs to call out the top and bottom elevations. If the wall exceeds 4' in height or if a tiered wall is not separated by 2x the height of the taller wall (as measured from the face of the upper wall to the back of the lower wall), the applicant will need to have the wall engineered by a registered professional engineer. • The plan needs to show the erosion control measures on it. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Jesse Struve, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Orono (952) 249-4661 - Direct (952) 249-4616- Fax www.ci.orono.mn.us 1 • Jesse Struve From: Jesse Struve Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 4:19 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Christine Mattson Subject: 20120914 950 Willow View Dr-2012-00424 Melanie, I have reviewed the permit for the proposed sport court and have the following comments: • The survey shows the wetland edge and buffer area "as shown on grading plan dated 4-7-00". I am fine with the wetland boundary shown like this, but the buffer edge seems to have changed since 00 and should be reflective on the survey. They should show where the edge of the mowed grass and compare it to where the buffer was shown in 2000. • The proposed retaining wall needs to call out the top and bottom elevations. If the wall exceeds 4' in height or if a tiered wall is not separated by 2x the height of the taller wall (as measured from the face of the upper wall to the back of the lower wall),the applicant will need to have the wall engineered by a registered professional engineer. • The plan needs to show the erosion control measures on it. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Jesse Struve, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Orono (952) 249-4661 - Direct (952) 249-4616- Fax www.ci.orono.mn.us 1 �o�� BOl_TON � M � NK , I p Z Consulting Engineers & Surveyors m� 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200•Chaska, MN 55318-1172 fin&Sur' Phone(952)448-8838• Fax(952)448-8805 . www.bolton-menk.com September 11,2012 City of Orono Attn: Christine Mattson PO Box 66 Orono, Mn 55323 RE: Wetland Delineation/Permit#2012-00424 950 Willow View Drive Dear Melanie: As requested,we have reviewed the wetland boundary and buffer area at 950 Willow View Drive. We offer the following observations,comments and recommendations for your consideration. 1. I reviewed the wetland delineation report on September 10,2012 and agree with the wetland boundary as marked. However, final approval of the wetland boundary is the responsibility of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD). A copy of any permits and approvals required from MCWD should be submitted to the City prior to any land disturbing activities. 2. The proposed construction has the potential to adversely impact the wetland which will trigger the wetland protection ordinance requirements.Therefore,the following should be considered: a. This wetland is listed as a"management 3"wetland in the MCWD's Functional Assessment of Wetlands inventory,which requires a 16.5 foot buffer per City code. b. The wetland delineation report indicated that the buffer area is"manicured lawn dominated by Kentucky blue grass." The area of manicured lawn within the buffer area must be removed and native vegetation will need to be established in its place. MnDOT seed mix 350 is recommended for upland buffer areas. A Vegetation Management Plan, including methods for removal and control of any invasive plants and a schedule of native vegetation establishment, should be submitted for review. c. Wetland Buffer markers should be placed at the upland boundary of the buffer edge located at lot lines and changes of buffer edge direction and spaced a maximum 200 feet apart. d. A $2,000 escrow should be submitted by the Owner to cover the cost of buffer development if not completed by the applicant. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON&MENK, INC. Mark L. Perry,WDC Natural Resources Specialist Cc: David Martini, Bolton&Menk Robert Bean, Bolton&Menk Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:25 PM To: 'Alyssa Kanive' Cc: Melanie Curtis Subject: 950 Willow View Drive/#2012-00424 Attachments: 950 Willow View Dr-Recommendation_0901112.pdf; Escrow Agreement-Wetland Buffer 2012-00424.pdf Hi Alyssa, Our wetland specialist has reviewed the wetland edge and buffer. I have attached his comments. We know the MCWD already stated this project doesn't trigger their requirements, so don't worry about that comment. Please submit a plan for the wetland buffer establishment, see 2b. Once the plan is submitted, I will submit it to our wetland specialist for approval. I'm continuing to move this application through our other departments for their review. My hope would be by the time your buffer plan is submitted and approved, the permit will be ready to issue. A requirement of the wetland buffer establishment, is a wetland buffer escrow and escrow agreement. Also, attached is a wetland buffer escrow agreement. Please sign and submit with a $2,000 check. We will deposit the check and hold the funds until the new buffer area is established. Our wetland specialist will revisit the site after a growing season to verify it's in compliance with the approved plan you've submitted. The wetland buffer escrow is held in addition to the building permit escrow you've already submitted. Once the building permit is finalized and an as-built survey is submitted and approved, send me an email requesting your building permit escrow to be refunded. The building permit escrow can be refunded after I verify there are no outstanding, unpaid pass-through engineering bills. The wetland buffer escrow is also refunded once it's established and approved and I verify there are no outstanding, unpaid pass-through engineering bills. I know this was a lot of information, so please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono MN 55356 (physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing address) 952.249.4620 8 952.249.4616 cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us I www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Monday, November 12, 2012 1 Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 2:27 PM To: 'Mark Perry' Cc: Melanie Curtis Subject: 950 Willow View Drive/#2012-00424 Attachments: admin@ci.orono.mn.us_20120831_111015.pdf; W12-22_Boundary&Type NOA.PDF Mark, The property at 950 Willow View Drive, permit#2012-00424 is proposing a sport court. This project does not trigger the MCWD requirements so they did not require a wetland delineation. The attached partial copy of the survey shows the delineation edge and buffer from 2000 when the subdivision was created. The property owners have also had Arrowhead Environmental Consulting permit a delineation which is not depicted on the survey. The wetland edge and buffer are marked on the property. Please visit the site and advise if the buffer meets our requirements or if it needs improving. We would appreciate your report by Tuesday, September 11, 2012. Thank you. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono MN i 55356(physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing address) 1ir 952.249.4620 I 952.249.4616 cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Monday, November 12, 2012 1 Jay Kanive From: Catherine Bach <cbach@minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Monday,August 20, 2012 10:18 AM To: Jay Kanive Cc: a.kanive@mchsi.com; Ben Carlson Subject: Buffer Map - 950 Willow View Drive, Orono Attachments: 00-024_plan.pdf Jay, As we discussed during our meeting at your property, a wetland delineation was performed throughout the entire Willow View development for the subdivision permit in 2000(MCWD permit#00-024). The wetland on your property was expanded and re-graded as part of the developer's wetland replacement plan, and a 16.5' buffer was incorporated along the wetland boundary (see attached plan). If your current project triggered the need for a MCWD permit, we would just have you add the original wetland boundary and buffer as required for the development permit onto your current survey rather than have you perform a new delineation. Even if the wetland boundary changes from when it was originally delineated,the 16.5' buffer does not move with the boundary, and is shown on the attached plan. While a field delineation reflects the most accurate and current wetland boundary,for the purposes of consistency throughout the development (and logistics relating to buffer layout, etc.), this is how we would handle it. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Catherine Bach District Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 Direct: (952) 641-4504 Main Office: (952)471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.org MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Think Green - please do not print this email unless necessary 1 Christine Mattson From: Catherine Bach [cbach@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:45 PM To: 'Stacey.Lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us'; 'Peterson, Lynda (BWSR)'; 'Doperalski, Melissa (DNR)'; 'Jenny, Melissa M MVP'; Christine Mattson; a.kanive@mchsi.com; Ben Carlson Subject: WCA Boundary&Type Notice of Application - 950 Willow View Drive, Orono Attachments: W12-22_Boundary&Type NOA.pdf Good afternoon, Please find attached a Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application for a wetland boundary&type determination for the parcel located at 950 Willow View Drive in Orono. The complete application is included. Comments on this application will be accepted until 4:30 PM on August 7, 2012. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Catherine Bach District Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 Direct: (952) 641-4504 Main Office: (952)471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.org ,.1 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Think Green - please do not print this email unless necessary . . cl. 0.4i. 7 O O CITY of ORONO _ Municipal Offices pa Y:' D+ Street Address: Mailing Address: "�' �:;.� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 �� G~ �hx �L04� Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 ESH May 25, 2012 Justin &Alyssa Kanive 950 Willow View Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: 950 Willow View Drive Building Permit Application #2012-00424 The City is in receipt of your building permit application which was received by this office on May 17, 2012. Staff has identified a wetland on the property which is classified as a Manage 3 and requires a 16.5' buffer and a 20' structure setback. After a cursory review your application is incomplete. The following items must be submitted or revised in order for your application to be considered complete and for the plan review to continue: 1. Wetland Delineation. Please have a wetland delineation performed on the wetland on your property. The wetland delineation must be submitted to and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). After the MCWD approves the delineation, the delineated edge of the wetland must be shown on the survey, along with the required buffer and structure setback. 2. Certificate of Survey. Once the wetland delineation has been approved by the MCWD please update the survey with the new information and submit two copies. 3. Plans. Please submit two sets of plans pertaining to the sport court construction. 4. Escrow & Escrow Agreement. Building permits involving grading and/or review by the City's engineer require submittal of an escrow and an escrow agreement. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for out-of-pocket costs incurred during the review of your plans. Additionally this escrow will guarantee conformance with City Code Chapter 79 relating to erosion control and stormwater. The required escrow amount for this project is $2,500. The escrow agreement is enclosed. The property owner must sign the escrow agreement and submit a check for$2,500. Additionally, the City's wetland regulations and wetland buffer requirements may be triggered by the project. Please review the enclosed information sheet regarding Construction near a Wetland and following the instructions provided. The above information is required in order for the plan review to continue. Please feel free to contact me at 952.249.4620 or by email at cmattson(c�ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO DALLIkkal0T---- Christine Mattson Planning Assistant c Alyssa Kanive via email -a.kanive(a�mchsi.com Kevin Zwart; Sport Court Minnesota via email—Kevin(a sportcourtmn.com enclosures Telephone (952)249-4600 • Fax (952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us Approximate Parcel Boundary Arrowhead 2012 Boundary Buffer Ix Kjolhaug Delineation I mit p I 4111110164. F .. . y a K 6, § . rt 41 �m`�!' T �� ice,..�„y�„r+Y --IN:: � +v _..1 4s s. r` 4- _ a � Map of Wetland Delineation 4 Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Image arrowhead environmental 'Feet 950 Willow View Dr. wiiOrono, MN 55356 consulting0 50 100 200 Kanive Parcel ' http:!/map•.googltcom.lmaps?hl en&tab wl .to- n d X ,�',��44995564,-93586803 Goo... x L. A, inf.'" Ede Eft view Favorites Ioots Heti) 14 71 Suggested Sites.. §Web Slice Gallery.. nt - ® - ci rig gage• safety• Tools• •• n +You Search Images Maps Play ,'.• News Gmail Documents Calendar More- Google 44.995564.-93.586803 Q Sign in Get directions My places iffp W 'f .., .4144. ...: •,-,-,-4 .... ,,,,..toA44.az.,..„._ , .. .,.,..,,,,,,... ,_,,,,,,,,., ,,.„4t,Z. .4„.,:. ,, �� '1.)./` yN t 4 950 Willow View Dr •:4',...:- a"' . Long Lake,MN 55356 127 ft NE113 et* �1 Traffic ,.(V •,` 1 :.s"= , -.,,,,,,,-.1,,,..t..,,,,,,� " :; ." . Or r' Directions Search nearby more- `� t tb a.^ • Maps Labs-Hep ' 1 r.1.-..'of �i i .�,s' Googi Maps-12012 Googr.•TRIMS o/Use-Privacy ►7 °'" } ��L,"""�+��,,• 1111...4.,1.1 S 'y I 4 V . •^ r i 1:. �" A.• - • s 4. 1i ?'^R i+ '*' �/ • .:',..t '�' •�° +, rMi' 'I.sfi _1y "' `' �yt w C �"'...i.N. p Rte.«.' ir::.. .1. f rt . •4 ��... � rC;....,....F' +�-.� VII rn r< I { ' -1111.0111111111, ..- :,.moi,f� kr —mimMi P Approximate Parcel Boundary ••' _ _ • , Nil ; r1 a. L fA-' Arrowhead 2012 Boundary _ . , ' _ II' fir? ; . Buffer lir [ ,iii.- " __ ::: 171:,:ieerfr ;:ier!f/P:a- I= �-1 Kjolhaug Delineation 142., 7111111111111111:. - } ' : .. : Cli T ' . r • 1 1 J el, C _ Alf. • Jiliersc' r..... ,„.. , ,,,„ . . c. , r,„. ci: .1 ,,,,..„....t,. . 7 S /.0„,i . , ....,....., lier---1 , X r a..... r3.... ., _1/2._ . . . . . g . , ' d+ - Sit _ p. Jo rt oil .q S 59 i i y '6 ■: l i f Fr , ter . .4 I AI"' r fe.4.....'.- -i": 011:1, - 0--.00,;(4i-d-drallr if Id fri 1., aii ...I , . 11 iiii i . . ie ., die ., 1 41214.151:1 1 efli'dio . I IU1-, .4101r/O. ;.- .1.i ,, i r,,,„„.A 4 rJj .,. f� ,fes 01!7.7r., ` l .FF:ji dr ' i I I . -•.".4NrifiliFiif:/ f 7 re?"7/..,„... ZF'1° d 1 ir lk .1., III lo" l !U • ; - u f _-i' 4-11 l a 1 R aWii) Map of Wetland Delineation +,Overlaid on Site Plan arrowhead environmental 'Feet 950 Wlllow View Dr. Orono, MN 55356 consulting 0 50 100 200 c Kanive Parcel DATE TIME V CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO.070/A -0641dii COMPLETED 7-d F-/f' ADDRESS f..5-0 VI 663 14c4) 10 r OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION 5/art G06y? IQ CIFOOTING 1:1PLUMBING FINAL LI EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS ' ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL • ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q 0 RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS V❑ FINAL CI SEWER HOOK-UP CI COMPLAINT Q DEMO-SITE CISEPTIC MAINT /,FOLLOW-UP UP ❑ DEMO-FINAL CI SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO 93 COMMENTS: pt em•t hd 1c0e.� iLfe.t, ct� cc O iarrK g,O .! -eiri.el W /04 64c 4r.0 -S--- .��e - ,',0 °` e c��ec� -o%e:� Q ' Z0 /ti 4$ -,64,.1..e .514 r uey /lc ref 1 es) ro ar W L r•.c4 44 0 0 .rz0,V,.. des c i acJ_ cc cie--1.0.--t :sr 4r 4O I LU ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED l iIIOJECT COMPLETE W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 LI CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY C.1 BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN El CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR 0 INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector.9 .., White Copyllnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice ri • 7 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 1.PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Alyssa Kanive 950 Willow View Drive Application Number 6/25/12 W12-22 Type of Application(check all that apply): ®Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑Replacement Plan ❑Banking Plan Summary and description of proposed project(attach additional sheets as necessary): • Alyssa Kanive has applied for approval of wetland boundary&type at the parcel located at 950 Willow View Drive in the city of Orono(PID#2811823440017). The application was received on June 26,2012. The delineation was performed by Arrowhead Environmental Consulting on June 7,2012. The boundary will be reviewed in the field by MCWD staff. 2.APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Catherine Bach business-day comment period): District Technician August 7,2012(4:30 PM) Address(if different than LGU) Date,time,and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following field review Deephaven,MN 55391 of the delineation and completion of the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952)641-4504 ® Staff cbach@minnehahacreek.org minnehahacreek.org ❑ Governing Board or Council Signature: leg '1 / Date: I-A t BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 3.LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member:Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us BWSR TEP member:Lynda Peterson—lynda.peterson@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): O DNR TEP member: DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Melissa Doperalski— Melissa.Doperalski@state.mn.us O WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different):Alyssa Kanive—a.kanive@mchsi.com ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Consultant:Arrowhead Environmental Consulting(Ben Carlson)—benc@arrowheadec.com City: Christine Mattson—cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Melissa Jenny—Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION >For a list of BWSR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/contact/WCA areas.pdf >For a list of DNR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidji,MN 56601 Grand Rapids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions,see:http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >For a list of Corps of Project Managers:www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN:OP-R 180 Fifth St.East,Suite 700 St.Paul,MN 55101-1678 >For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 5.ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application,list any other attachments: 111 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Application for Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: 950 Willow View Drive Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek WD (Orono) Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): SE 1/4 of Section 28, T118N, R23W 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Alyssa Kanive Address: 950 Willow View Drive City, State, Zip: Orono, MN 55356 E-mail: a.kanive@mchsi.com Phone: 952-426-9070 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): Arrowhead Environmental Consul. Contact Person: Ben Carlson Address: 2909 Meadow Lane City, State, Zip: Mound, MN 55364 E-mail:benc@arrowheadec.com Phone: 612-237-5996 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: 0 Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) El Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner to pursue this determination. 6/25/12 Applicant or Authorized Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 , 950 Willow View Drive — Orono, MN Wetland Delineation Report For: Alyssa Kanive 950 Willow View Drive Orono, MN 55356 )CAr arrowhead environnentai cons uconsult .ing Wetland Consulting Services Performed by: Ben Carlson, WDC (#1125) AEC Project # 2012-033 June 25, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting 2909 Meadow Lane Mound, MN 55364 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Overview: Summary of Project and Results Report Body: Introduction 1 Methods 1 Results 1 Discussion 2 Data Sources and Literature References 3 Project Figures and Supporting Data: Figure 1: Map of Project Location(USGS Topo) Figure 2: Map of Project Location(MN DNR PWI Map) Figure 3: Hennepin County Soil Survey Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 5: Map of Wetland Delineation(GPS Located) Figure 6: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Functional Assessment Map Field Data Collection Forms (Data Sheets) Photo Log Project Overview On June 7, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation at the 950 Willow View Drive Property located in Orono, MN. • One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds; Wetland 1 is a Shallow Marsh located in the eastern portion of the parcel. • Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMC wetland. • Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map. • Wetland 1 is mapped in the Cordova and Hamel soil series. • Wetland 1 is dominated by Canada bluejoint, reed canary grass, sedges, rushes, and cattail with scattered willow and dogwood shrubs. • The wetland boundary was generally placed along the vegetative transition from hydrophytic to non-hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in topography), and the presence or lack of hydrology indicators. Introduction On June 7, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation at the 950 Willow View Drive Property located in Orono, MN. The legal description of the project location is: A part of the SE '/ of Section 28, T118N, R23W, Hennepin County, Orono, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 1.16 acres (according to the Hennepin County Website). Methods AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Excelsior Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the Hennepin County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map (Figure 4) were reviewed prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process. The delineated wetland boundaries (GPS located) are indicated on Figure 5 and are overlaid on a 2010 aerial image. Figure 6 shows the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Functional Assessment Map; the wetland in question is considered a "Manage 3" wetland under the Districts classification system. AEC used the routine delineation method. Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District; Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI". The Circular 39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — Region 3 (Sabine 1999). In accordance with the Midwest Regional Supplement, the + and—have been removed from the vegetation indicator status. Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially; flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within representative upland and wetland locations. Results Office Results Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMC wetland. The delineated wetland is located in the Cordova and Hamel soil series. The Cordova and Hamel soil series are classified as hydric soils (SCS Hydric Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map(PWI). 1 Field Results Wetland 1 AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Shallow Marsh (Type 3, PEMF) wetland. Wetland 1 is dominated by Canada bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), sedge (Carex) species, rush (Scirpus) species, path rush (Juncus tenuis) and narrow-leaved cattail (Typha angustifolia) with scattered willow (Salix) and dogwood (Cornus) species along the fringe of the basin. The adjacent upland area is manicured lawn dominated by Kentucky blue grass(Poa pratensis). The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited a rather abrupt transition; the wetland boundary was generally placed along the transition from reed canary grass, path rush, and Canada bluejoint(hydrophytic vegetation)to the manicured lawn. The wetland soil boring met the F2 (Loamy Gleyed matrix) hydric soil indicator. Water was observed within 7" of the soil surface with saturation observed at the soil surface at the wetland sample point. The upland soil boring did not meet a hydric soil indicator, non-hydrophytic vegetation was dominant and hydrology indicators were not met. It appears that several wetlands in the area were excavated and expanded during the construction of the housing development. Discussion One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions. In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal). Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling, draining, excavating wetlands within your project location. If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time (612-237-5996). Thank you, ,A3j7dvv C o Ben Carlson, WDC Ecologist/Owner Arrowhead Environmental Consulting 2 Data Sources: USGS Quadrangle Map—Excelsior 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Minnesota, U.S.A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin County 1983 (Revised 1996 data from the Mn DNR Data Deli, online). Soil Survey of Hennepin County. U.S.D.A. Data obtained from the NRCS/SSURGO website. United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map — Excelsior Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs). Aerial Photos were obtained the Land Management Information Center website(2010). Literature Referenced/Technical Documents: Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. 2007. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263pp, unclassified. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, F W S/OBS-79/31. 103 pp. Sabine, B. J. 1999. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Region 3 — North Central (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin). Resource Management Group, Inc. 77pp. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. 2006. Field indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. A guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 6.0 National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. Publication Number 1491. 1991. 3 Figures . i . \ ‘... 1 \ 4'V) ye \..\.....j ,-. el i• ar • :RA — r ----. "`")rnir; _. ... • • ..____ --- . _ , ..* .. FR ir s V . ... .E 1 II .5 1 • 1 • 1 * la 41--,_ _ 9mSiarn:- ." I !, iir .:2--.... i a ,.. a .0 a 1 • II a • • I.• Ca ... , .- i'... 1,4.-....... , - / .-1 I .77 ..**'"*•— ' * /-,'''.• ' '''''''''...,.......... ________ ..... ..., ., • i• ,,, --.._, .4, a • • . i - .--- .--o'N., \ ,' '-. •1'' 1 \ ,- .,. - -__•-' ...,- "--,, •• -s."--- ' . 1: "•, e . 1f.""'11.--1..-.,-W.4•'I 4 ,. s *zrr -...:z. n 0I I.,i•'.;.'".'•,',t II "." ' ----- , ...,-,--- 077::(71 i ..2 , ,..i.„) t7.4 .) . , . i 'I 1 HIP VI 1/14-4 I . 1 ,,j.! ksliNs ( 1 II i 1 -•• ',,t.) NI.). / / 't .„ NO i. f- —6th -/ r !‘ , "----- ; ) ....._-- -\ •-,.., i , .1.. , --- 999 1 .-i; .--. ' _,...... ....__..3 • . _ -_ --- • , ...._,, ---2., TiO2 ,., , i ) ,,. --.! I e. ---- — ', ' --- .. . ... . „.• , ,--_, i.,.. , ( ,- ) ..,.......;zrz.•.--T.,/ , - - %, , ,4 , r-----:'"\\ c \ - . . ,,... ; ,.., N...\.: r % `.. ... ‘,. • - \ ''s,-,zi .-",-' • 0Q.:-.11 ( i----,.:-,... ,... •• .., ; w) r— ( -;.. .• ....„,,--......, 1 I I I --.s:\- ==.-7,',.....e. \ ,"— ..."4"' ........„, . ) I 7- r $ - , , ...,- 1 1,, c--' - / L a k i , , 1 , .,„ • 1 N . ....,-..------iZa. ill N, 1 . \ - ...---- -....) Project Location I, . ., \ 1 1 I , k, .. _ 1 • ._. ) - i i \ k ) 3 \i, • ›,,•/ .- . ....., _._- 1, C k (0) ..- .. . 413 1 6.-I 03 r $ 1 —....- 1 -,,,, N...... lom, \ ---..e.N.., .„ f" —..... ... , _,-- ----- .,, Dickeys.Lake O''... %--- _,-"- ---r. • CY 411.7----..\ xi i---_(75. up • • ' ..." irA..-44-.44 ,1 Kelley _ , . - '-. ,-..-..•!c..-'>..i.6....'l,„..:',',v,'.•-a i rriit-!i„l;I - N, spa -, 1 1-..-\it •- s N N 74:-....-77-::-- -::-..:::-.:.:7;.-/--______ _ __...,, wit; ) IF 1 - N, .1 H aya '- ,..... -'----"' LI'''. -I ...\ , LAI • • 4I L i • Vkla III AIII0 Map of Project Location -ft df.._ Overlaid on USGS Topo Map arrowhead iiim Approximate Parcel Boundary Figure 1 \ 11.011111CIllti miNINEL950 Willow View Dr.1 Feet Orono, MN 55356 (' () I'l ',4 li I t I tI (i. 0 375 750 1.500 Kanive Parcel ._—, Pli I . _ _L.16 - T . - T i IC Mk war mow - r � 1 1 D( tivit 1 1 1 1 Dickey's (27-161 W) 1 it qpi S43 clAt ... _ ____ 10 4 1 6111.1 1 Unnamed (27-839 W) a ‘ r LL Map of Project Location 4- Iv Overlaid on MN DNR P0/1!vial) arrowhead mi Approximate Parcel Boundary Figure 2 (.11\ 1 I'()11111(.111 11950 Willow View Dr amma. 1 Feet Orono.WIN 55356 consulting 0 375 750 1.500 Kanive Parcel '• DPW olle • /r x " e ,, 'Al, t * ' ' I , i c ws ,.-0,:1,,.. e r ,n u 1 ",r 1144 WO r 4 '''''r I. a. t Hared} '-,sem >tc , #'(rt110vil 56 " e } is.. Artr # . '` , , waw t rpt a :::., ,(.:'#,,,%In, / F , r s- .,„, +: 41 Hennepin County Soil Survey T1= '` Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Image Figure arrowhead p Apprnxnnate Parcel Boundary Non-Hydric J Hydric r�g u re 3 (..`:.1\ l.1't?11 111 C'I 1 t d l 950 Willow View Dr. Feet Orono• rv1N 55356 (' 0 1 `+ 1 1 I 11 D 50 100 -00 Kanive Parch t +'. n »z p; yy W s 'h • ' to , ;' r',1, , litligft***4‘41111101e*: ''' :r, t „',45* f *I r ate, :. $ ;'k % PEMC 4 lt 1 ' %1% v f Y`p mow: ' 4;irr ,,,:te:::,,r*.S.,,N.,,' • ” 3w, National Wetland Inventory Map ��= Overlaid ori 2010.Aeritl lii i:ir arrowhead Approxnnatr, Parcel Boiin4iry ',...\,,W1j Figure 4 `'1 1 I'i>11 1 t 1�.'I 1 I ;; tK�i tNillovr View (7r Feet Orcno. MN 55356 t' 1 I 1 t i 1 �� 0 50 I00 „co Kaniue Parcel , ...,,, . . iiiiiito k , t s J., , „. , „ ,,, , ., ,,,.. r k 1 M r• ,. M1 (ij ,y 'v -''''N:'''' i . rw e* ,' x ittiiih'r `' Wetland �] a.1:4;;;A r ' . y ,., w ,�, -- I Y r St emr • 4 Y* rc M, 1111 Approximate Parcel Boundary ,. • Sample Point I GPS Located Wetland Boundary e (,•\,-Wcij Map of Wetland Delineation ��= Overlaid cn 2010 Aerial Image arrowhead Figure 5 (` 1 1 1-t_?11 1 I1 C I I t t Z I Feet O0 Willow View Dr. c C! i 1 ' 1 i 1 t I !1 s`, 50 100 200 Orono. i 553566 Kani4e Parch ilio * a mss ,� v. ;y T ) 1 lir'- i 4.; 7 v a ,, . ., k .w , . ,,,,, ,,...'w. oa h, /..., ,....., , . , „,1 12-Lrai)43.)19 - ik.4-i" fip, v Manage 3 ,, . i6'['* ,�A M.� e Ak µ `'k , i ' ''''.: .m a N a: S'''''''''''; 7 yf Ne y sa At - AV , b; d . Manage3 -ui Approximate Parcel Boundary ;4' ... =I FAW Assessed_Wetlands ' GPS Located Wetland Boundary re,,_ MCWD FAW Assessed Wetland Map ..1 ., (�VA4 Overlaid cn 2010 Aerial Image arrowhead Figure 6 (.`:l\ II.t111 1111.I l 1.itI 'Feet 950 Orowillno, AN 553ew 56 (' f! i 1 S 11 1 t I !1 �'- ., 50 100 200 Orona, tv1N 55356 Y, Kanive Parcel Supporting Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site 950 Willow View Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/7/2012 Applicant/Owner: Alyssa Kanive State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) Section,Township,Range: SE 1/4 Sec.28,T118N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 2 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Cordova(Hydric) VWI Classification: PEMC Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y If yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Well above average precipitation for the previous 2 months. VEGETATION --Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (NB) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Salix bebbiana 35 Y FACW Total%Cover of: 2 Salix amygdaloides 25 Y FACW OBL species 70 x 1 = 70 3 Cornus racemosa 10 N FAC FACW species 60 x 2= 120 4 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 70 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 160 (A) 280 (B) 1 Calamagrostis canadensis 40 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.75 2 Scirpus atrovirens 20 Y OBL 3 Juncus tenuis 20 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is=3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 90 =Total Cover _(explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-14 10Y 5/1 95 lOGY 6/1 5 C M Clay *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol(A1) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) _Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) _-True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots X Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _-Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 7 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site 950 Willow View Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 6/7/2012 Applicant/Owner: Alyssa Kanive State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) Section,Township,Range: SE 1/4 Sec.28,T118N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 2 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Cordova(Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N If yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Well above average precipitation for the previous 2 months. VEGETATION --Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover — Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 50 x 3= 150 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 50 (A) 150 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 50 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is=3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 50 =Total Cover _(explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Manicured lawn, area partially graded for sprinkler system installation. e SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 3/1 100 Clay loam Mixed material/texture 20-28 2.5Y 4/1 100 Clay 28-34 5Y 5/2 100 Clay *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: Topsoil likely fill material from development of property. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) _-Iron Deposits(B5) _(C6) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) -Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: a 1 ` • F SJ P „'1,'1;15;4 1� Me'}, A4 '�f,'Ir`a"' .`., q of �"', SI '♦ M � } q M� Rd M �` % #y'a'k J y,•r s T • "tW �p • *° i .. . . 7. 3E 1' • pp r2 � F,� 4 ••,1‘. t r f M tom' r )1,14..t.“ t- ""4„.."0,44;444-4t- ,./1r7-/ 7 a„."-**11, - a" `4/4 vP ,• r >IAN** n ✓,w «NL �W t ♦ - -. i ',g p,'._ y Photo 1: View of Wetland 1 edge at transect 1-1 location facing east. 4r`` • ♦...4 : ' i `„ er410 4 • W ' Photo 2: View of Wetland 1 facing south from the transect location.