Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MWCA notice of app
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Mike Rodewald 4760 West Branch Road,Orono 08/03/2013 W16-42 Type of Application(check all that apply): ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Summary and description of proposed project(attach additional sheets as necessary): Mike Rodewald has applied for wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 4760 West Branch Road in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Section 6, Township 117N, Range 23W. The boundary/type approval was requested on August 3rd, 2016. A wetland delineation was conducted by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC on July 11th, 2016. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on August 3rd, 2016. One wetland was delineated on site. Wetland 1 (Basin 1) was identified as a Type 2, wet meadow. The boundaries will be reviewed in the field by MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255,Subp.3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum 15 Heidi Quinn business-day comment period): Permitting Technician 08/30/2016(4:30PM) Address(if different than LGU) Date,time,and location of decision: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following the review Minnetonka,MN 55345 of the application and completion of the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952)641-4504 ® Staff hquinn@minnehahacreek.org minnehahacreek.org ❑Governing Board or Council Signature: `i Tl'� � " Date: 08/09/2016 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES Z SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us • BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.meyer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP member: Becky Horton- becky.horton@state.mn.us • DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Leslie Parris- leslie.parris@state.m n.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Mike Rodewald— mike.rodewald@lambtonquay.com ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Wayne Jacobson (Jacobson Environmental,PLLC)—jacobsonv@msn.com,Christine Mattson(City of Orono)- cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny— melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/contact/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidji,MN 56601 Grand Rapids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN:OP-R 180 Fifth St.East, Suite 700 St. Paul,MN 55101-1678 For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, list any other attachments: Z Complete delineation report BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com August 2, 2016 Mike Rodewald 4760 West Branch Road Orono, MN 55364 mike.rodewald@lambtonquay.com RE: Project Name: 4760 W Branch Rd Orono Delineation Comm. No.: 2016-162 Project Location: City of Orono PID 0611723330002 T117N, R23W, Section 6 Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Dear Mike: As discussed, Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE)visited the above referenced site to perform an official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. Adjacent site land use includes residential lots, wetlands, and woodlands on all sides. This parcel is a combination of a wetland, grasslands, and woodland at 4760 West Branch Road, Orono, Minnesota. Figure 5 is a Wetland Delineation Map of the property. Figure 6 is a site location map of the property. All figures referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins and classify the wetland habitat. Grassland Species Noted Wet Meadow Species Noted Trees Trees Black Walnut Black Willow Box-Elder Shrubs Common Buckthorn Herbs Herbs Kentucky Bluegrass Reed Canarygrass Red Clover Tall Goldenrod Common Dandelion Spotted Touch Me Not Birdsfoot Trefoil Lesser Duckweed Ground Ivy Hairy Crabgrass Virginia Creeper Northern Bedstraw The growing season for this site is approximately from 4/15 to 10/15 where the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. The growing season in 2016 started in April. The precipitation for the previous three months along with the comparison of the 7/11/16 precipitation worksheet data was as follows: Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 1 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com June May April Worksheet(Wks) 4.06* 2.51 3.30 * = NWS Data 30% less than 3.24 2.36 1.92 30% more than 5.45 3.96 2.83 2012 Wks Interpret Normal Normal Dry Multi-month score (3*2) + (2*2) + (1*3) = 13 Normal (10 to 14 being normal) The delineation was performed on July 11, 2016 and it is unlikely the precipitation totals in this period affected the boundary of any wetlands in this delineation, since the period was normal. Precipitation data is located in Appendix A. This wetland delineation was performed and reported by Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists —Professional Wetland Scientist#1000, University of Minnesota/ BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019, American Fisheries Society—Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171. Methodology The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were catalogued and assigned a wetland indicator status according to: Lichvar, R.W., Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner, 2014. The National Wetland Plant List:2014 Update of Wetland Ratings, Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant's scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine)were assigned an obligate (OBL)1, facultative wet(FACW), and/or facultative (FAC)wetland status. With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute % cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50% of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetative cover. OBL=Obligate Wetland,occurs an estimated 99%in wetlands.FACW=Facultative Wetland,has an estimated 67%-99%probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative,is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wetlands,34%-66%probability. FACU=Facultative Upland,occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23% probability.UPL=Upland,almost never occurs in wetlands,<1%probability.NI=No Indicator,insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+)or lower(-)frequency of occurrence with an category. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0(USDA NRCS 2010) if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic(reduced) and aerobic(oxidized)conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2. Many of the soils have a high organic matter content 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Wetland Classification Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979)and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998)are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 3 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"-40", noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange "wetland boundary"flagging tape or flagging tied on vegetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped using modern survey methods by others. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Results Basin 1 Basin 1 is a PEMBd ditched Type 2 wet meadow basin comprised of 85% reed canarygrass, 5% narrow leaf cattail, 5% tall goldenrod, 2% lake sedge, and 2% swamp smartweed, along with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Hamel soil to saturated Hamel and Klossner soils in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Figure 2) identifies Basin 1 on the subject site. According to the DNR Protected Waters Map (PWI) (Figure 4)of Hennepin County there are no DNR Public Waters on the site. According to the Web Soil Survey(Figure 3)the following hydric soils existed on the parcel: Hamel Klossner Photographs of Basin 1 are presented in Appendix C. Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 4 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the City of Orono and other agencies. I certify that I performed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. g• 8/2/16 Wa a E. Jacobso Date Professional Soil Scientist#30611 Professional Wetland Scientist#1000 Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019 Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. Regulators: Katherine Sylvia, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Ben Meyer, BWSR Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 5 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans FIGURES Figure 1 - Togo Map J / /it / .- ,,i. ./ P,',/ _ N'., .. //'''' itr"A- N - I I , . , ,0 \,,,- - ___________ ___:_-_______ ,., .:., /,,, . si I of( . .( I )i Y -1,/,../ I +0 IV --.--.--// -------- ,. , „ „ ii,.,-„,„,-- ,:. ,----- •,• ••. \)., \ ...,.. ,,„• „v.-2. . .., , . „..... ,, • i „ • . 1,,„ , „,„, ,11 z,. .,._ , , , ,, ...., --,__.. ,,,,.., ,..,,_ , • . ,.7.---,.,...,:. , gpf,814, „.....8 ,.i ) /‘ _.... ,..--\\ I 4-I '.4,, h ';',-,,,:_.// .0/1"...//./1/07 -) `.--•/ i ' /. )1 t I, :. ---0 fir .„----- -, ,) it'( /---.- \ LI. ( - .- ..--- H I I‘;\\\‘''\'`.,,'\\' / / .,0•- .,„// L. \,„.. „.. .,J s._______.--_,,...:,,--,;7 ?,..:c , . '...,:,,„, \ ' !':7.1, (ir\%s, •''' / /- \ '' I I i -- \ i -A• I \ I ' 7', .`,,. • „ 1 ' . r'1'.''9‘ ffil• ''\:::)%A.':.\::\ i 1.--''''\III 1( ' t''' ''''' iP1//----) ::\''' .,.,\,. ,,,'} YV- I•12r), ..,,., . \'-1.----- .---------:-.'j)0.;-:; . "----• . k \II%\\.\11)111 Oji..\11 dzill I - ‘--- ./IW ..ty---1.-11 1.-,C,\_/-..__-•..,%./0://;:-I-I----__--4 1..\\\\ .40 )/ iiii .. - ,--- \'.\. I 4... / 1 ._— .-;_;----,_ ) y I).1 \\ '',3 i•-/',.1/7/41,7 ,...--.= •:...: I.A', ,.. ,.'. '.. v.'al( t.,-,- ,---.:--,.? ,t f - , ( - .'':m. ,..1\'‘.\00, '.lt ) 1\i:,/,( --'. -.' 1111 ti. ),,i /,,,/p .,_ / !I' /7---"' / • , ,,,,„, •„,„tr , , ,,,,,,„..,„„„,„\,\., , ,...--....- :,._. ,, i 1 I. )1 1,.. i t•- ',,..-.„.:.,,,.. ....,,,: v.:,,T.\,.._ --- - A, if • :7.il ) ( ---, . , A 1 i V ( -'21,/./V/ \ "- ••=-.-...'-____., ,1,/,i,A>4' / / - t- -------:'.9\,;.^ ..:\):• .:: .,,\ •:, -7-^--.:-.-.' '')n, .--',..'-. i n /,A. ,,,,, ,t ,,;• N•• ..\'''''; \:!::%'••:.Y..,,'---"----", ''' ',-' --.7:::-...':'•'.„. 1.' Lti.jj ) ? ''.\•:;" ---7-"::::----- 1.:,'( .-..''--'-..'''- .'-'• ".----='-.4.•-•-""::-... ..-iiik'-:- II -----' . S •,•!.:'. t . -- ---:-----..-,--- .,-\ . . , I •--,:::::-._-_,..-.---z--- ...,7- f:.',,------ .......„/ ,--A,4 • ' • ' "C. '. '. - -.: ,..'.:-,,;:,W":=;,-: -. ,,,e' 0.7...-..---,-:.----:, ----••ftler.. ..: - r /,,,'"",.-.---,-- ---, 1'V 'r..r. , ./...."/ .1.,(0 i ii0/711 7, ('I' - ' •-'' ''' 't." \-''1' . )%\%.-;::'''';\ ""---'.- '''''(------- — . .-Z--z-:---',..? i i :"74 t.-, -"--,-,,"""),, f ."---:::: ‘,k I i - --..._.--' ,Y.1'\'VVV.',.*-1' 3 \';'';\''i';':' " A',.: T,17---..- --• - , -: - .\,_NY..,- '.---:--L- /',--- l'i. , „ , , -\,-, . :'.!-,Z,--.,. •!..„...+4AtN k I s• I, . . , '2 i,("74.77 -,\\..,'.0. -.4pasz--...-::"-:::;.- / __.----. iii7 . i . ,..,\-,t r. 'i' ' --'---- ------ -%---: ::::-\ 1 \ . ---„,...../ i ------ :,;„-f5---- -. 7---__---„;•'-i,I,\? \V) i i. 0 ----- --) ''.:.''''''''': ,\ ':"•;-..;-.A-:1';,' , 1- ,110 .t- ,A,ii',..44.:''',, ')ox - ' .R'.1 ' ' --. i:. ',./-72-7,114'''''--,---L\ ) hilq.//: ' as- • t , ,.._ ..-7,- 4..,,,----1 t- ' - -.1 „ 1 1 i (i.--. -‘\ 1 di/...e..(4-1 ---4,, -.. S.--------,•,:---.-•;-, ,,,.. . • „,,,, , .,, . - , 1 , ,• .: , . k., • 1 - , \ 1! . . , it , •, i i. ,1'I i ---/ . .,----- --r.-- , I 9 , r I 1 ' i , -r i. ,.vr -._ ./ ..--,:.,-' , 1(r, r,r ir" __ ,....,,1'tv,:,,t ..".":-. I 1 j.I „ ...1--...21-. • ..r 1, ) .,-„,„/ .:Ai, ...4., -..A i '' II ,, /,/ % 4--...,,k r---„t t / 7,..,_.=-......,.., - . -,....---.. ...,„,.., . .1 .7_,...•••.,-..-...1111L-=:.=.•:-.......".4 ' - _ '1 . V u...1Timp, .., ,. _ . _.. , . ,..,.. v., :,-.TTLAII.;,•; -- *L--174r-r -7ii.,---=-------. .,, - .i.------_----, ::----,-----7 -=------ -------"` .---T---,-1-.!, , ,,__- , • ,,....--:____ erre?;,r Atif"i-7,. _--- , \lc - 1 " , . " (J.. -,...,.‘ --------,--...- --- r -'N . 1\cS) j i \ A . 1411 .. 1,44 .**.- .;,y,.f..1... , .. '.4.. ', ,) f,,,., .y. „. k.: :- „,\IL-.... .„,.. (---___--..-1,..., .•, ,,,,,..„-7.,...,..,4 t .___„1, , . ,_ ,r,,,,. re4----:---- '------•• :• ' //7"//7— •--c '', x — , ,,, \-,:. - \k,....--:, r - .4;•: - --,•:',--., -=•.,,,-•.--z•-1-....zz.-- , !,,,,.. :,,„,•••;)-r- , 1,4,•?!, — vo -.' - +4.-i<.?----A-..(,;,'-''''•'.,N\',.is'....\'--,::,'''s-..."—.."-/,/.1-W/,6,,i,,';/',,,-.';'.,'':/:,';/',,/:,'-.1-7-..-.'.=, .,......".:.,.'-....•.:'.,.,". i."!....,...-_--=----', '',---„-:--:-:::.:7-±0,,V7:..•.i'.--:..:':1-\.,,z,I./,....,(-.....--.p.-'-:_-,_-_,iI,'.1 1 ' 44101 :1 ,•'1:','-.- '--------:'::=:;,._,------;?'''''.,'"),'"'''0 )1 /1 . "\.."---) 1.--)ilil il /( . ':',.:'' ' /, 't::--:-Ir t".":-..-::,'-. -----1-_:'--,::: .,'S;',” "4%, '''.'::,.•..t.'4: ii I II •••----z--, -...:=-14 irl,.., . f/ 1( , ......) ;) ,...././ 1 1 1, ,.0 ,...0 4.--,.i.:-.7, - ..•,,:.,„,- - lir, 1.,„..,-..,,g, . . ------:-:`;'--r"---(11;..",4// r... ---""-I/ 0." I,' \ , --4.-:----2.i! '' '' 1\ '' -' I --4 1- (:::::,.1,.. ..,„:,,, '-----' I 1,0'1 10.0.60' '_ !, . .....c.,.,.,....,„ - ...1 r„._.- (i"-\...:: •,,,.‘,..:.=:,;,7."..... .,)1,,,, _....."/.1"1 1(.1 N,\\,\,...,:7----7---_-----.1-=-;7,;:.':::,•,'... , .1." r ... ,,k___.j•____ ----,- \ 'N,.. \-,..„, ' ./ .--'..--- , /!4r. ., ," '',,,_ _..1 --' \,, .---_,_-- - --',...:=..-f------",--","i y i I 1 - '-- -------.-------',.\WIli''V't •-•'',-,:. _ . .---------"-'----2-=------'::::.'-;---". '''.. .,.V //11 61.1.,'•!!"------. ' % WO 1.‘....•.____ -.. it 1, -— .• ) P ____ C. ...""-'-- "....' ) i i '',",' '0._ .----- --_ ":-.:;:------7-- — --_ --_-•:'---zz----,--- ..' _ \ I I I., .-.!•.....,-_,---_::„-_-7--.=-:::- 11;Dirlillre ../.... .../ .////)./1.!i..\--_:...\-----;. _ -::-,„-,:•.-5--: ,--.- - : --__:_----_____.---,;_::,, \\,,..,_•::„.,_-_,: ,:•7„,-;-,„:-.•,•:„. - /----:---7.,, \ t '•-, - „, , 1 /1.,.1 .,.\„___,.,_;_::::-:-;_z---__ -, „•.-.,,,,;,;•„- .,„,----77----_,. ., - ,_---_ -_-__-=:::.:- .. - --2------- ."--."-----.-"!--:. ..-1.. 0 0.03 006 0.12 018 MIO 41111111M,Ies Scale: 1:5,861 The State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources makes no representations or warranties expressed or implied,with respect to the use of maps or geographic data provided herewith regardless of its format or the means of its transmission.There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy,currency,suitabNity,or reliability of this data N for any purpose.The user accepts the data"as is." The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred as a result of any user reliance on this data.All maps and other material provided herein are protected by copyright. Extreme care was used during the compilation of this product.However,due to changes in ownership and • the need to rely on outside information,errors or omissions may exist If you should discover an oversight, we encourage you to let us know by calling the DNR at 1-888-646-6367 or by e-mail at info.dnr@state.mn.us. Created on 7/13/2016 Note:Elevation images and contours were generated from LiDAR derived elevation surfaces acquired 2007-2012. Jational Wetland Inventory Print ®i avers� :Bascrnap•• �^^Measure. ,''Share_ , 4750';^;^Branch Rd iDmn 0 ,ligilirihtili _________ IWI Cowardrn Class • :009-2014 ECMN_NWI_UTM — .y. . . Aquatic Bed - 1I ' Emergent rc.,.r= .4- S .: :: Vegetation ©�. 1,4c1 4! .'fes - 44' y / '• PEI-.11F r Forested r tS Moss/Lichen I - ,... • Open Water ' s."` i¢ � .q*- i rtr.11 :I • .s vw (Flooded Areas) ► s • r Rock Bottom t. ` 4 "` RockyII Shore • • ! 1 ; "'44'..'''t .1 r• r•. Ft-I HAI:. r .. • v % . 'w i'G Streambed :I " ` L.gr:liMGM , (Intermittent) •i \ Scrub-Scrub '` ` . v +, " ,J Forest . . I'F I iI-..1 ,.,• mil. � ,,1, • 4•. Unconsolidated r y ( ,� t• I `rr r l ` U Bottom(Basins& .2--, 111:11• r I I n•:I r.naa �^ 1,4-1.11,r7 nu -r L: ',Ill y rl Channels) • rr s y El I I rF••I, `I t I enl_ A Unconsolidated le Shore(Banks& I ri in ^- t� yr , Sandbars) i..... . # 'r+ ��, 1:111:: r' a_ l j M * SMN_NWI_UTM • 1111 J �* Aquatic Bed i ., + ;:io• al ", tiiii; 1 4 . y, 0 Illlii rrru:,.i . .- Emergent - 4 ^ Vegetation `1 A , - ; ) •r+ ® Forestedso, ' baim !} R, PrkIL: Prr:I11 •p , 2 E Moss/Lichen _ ' lit,$ s , Open Water ., fr. x (Flooded Areas) i I E2Ei1 , w , Rock Bottom MA j . i F•rlII + N'- ► "" IIII Rocky Shore #1 `rss.....1: ..,\ Y r # +(( �. ., ,.. - _-. .. Streambed -I _ (Intermittent) it +� * s l /TM C" r _� e1 n. Scrub-Scrub i e4. r . i 7 . .-P-ii,.-11, s • • ", . w. ,* . .1 . Forest :r., • +10- � ,� F + 1 .f.. Unconsolidated1d1 r" •t;R � w . t Sr V•77,- r . ♦ 11,4 7iR+lLfits.!LHf;^i...R- P'T'?'t . st- 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,MinnesotatA a (Figure 3-Soils Map) 449080 449100 449120 449140 449160 449180 449200 449220 449240 44°57 57"N 0.. 44°57 57'N p r o. M v4' `" I ' L41 C2'i;-'' , s . 1 1 tr i :' 'f M °�� i( L41 C2 I i•` M V - r „ t r _ 4 t - ,.,,,. , v , ,,,,, ,.., , %. - ,.... ti i • 'TA.� V.1" r g r' m 4.3tilit .,,-iii, 4 a ' • L40B ' i o m c o ' w L49AF4 a • ,}} • • L`36A"+t -+4 '.s :s (10i_ r .y .r ,. .1 mat "l'� ��1s . --7151 ; Branch Rd ► ._ I 44°57 50"N a `f a 44°57 Kr N 449080 449100 449120 449140 449160 449180 449200 449220 449240 3 ; e Map Scale:1:1,160 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet Meters N 0 15 30 60 90 m A 0 50 100 200 300 Map pro Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WG584 Edge bcs:UTM Zone 15N WG584 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 Mil Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3-Soils Map) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Area of Interest(AOI) 0. StonySpot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils Very Stony Spot Soil Map Unit Polygons Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line ...A. Soil Map Unit Lines placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. • Soil Map Unit Points .- Special Line Features Special Point Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map V Blowout Water Features measurements. Streams and Canals �.� Borrow Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Clay Spot +44 Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Closed Depression ti Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator X Gravel Pit US Routes projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate • Landfill Local Roads calculations of distance or area are required. A. Lava Flow Background This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of • Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography the version date(s)listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County,Minnesota • Mine or Quarry Survey Area Data: Version 11,Sep 18,2015 Miscellaneous Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 Q Perennial Water or larger. v. Rock Outcrop Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 16,2012—Apr 6, _4.. Saline Spot 2012 Sandy Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background • Severely Eroded Spot imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. • Sinkhole 3' Slide or Slip • Sodic Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Figure 3-Soils Map Map Unit Legend Hennepin County,Minnesota(MN053) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel 1.9 31.3% complex,0 to 3 percent slopes L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex,2 to 6 1.2 19.8% percent slopes L41 C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex,6 to 1.6 25.9% 12 percent slopes,eroded L49A Klossner soils,depressional,0 1.4 23.0% to 1 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 6.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 dal Ilk , • t%b`W' M♦ :i4 r ev1 I 0 \ 31 • 91t�n1! $y' '— ',. \ s -"--T tom_V-t-1-, 7 - - Mme_ 4 �� F - _...� 16. � + •l 1 ' r '. P\ r I .1` ClI7rT S I Site tli . I011SW 1t1 1 ffiP 4--- 1111W :1- - 4 — I I OS? 0 "Irrr \ 1 \. 0 Saga Ht1 . o , IVlP- ►C li, b fLEITIME ,J S I r= . I, . n Figure 4 DNR Public Waters Inventory Map TN Jacobson Environmental, PLLC Project No. 2016-162 s � aA • -\ % - 4t* .... n , xv>144.' id,. +:• � " ",r � ' ... 0534 -0611723320003 ; $: -," ,V., -e't,e1 r': t.1sw` r`a � 1 ,. 3 17'T-V M ' f may- 0:42fw y �'' 'R a ..-;,4,4 053-0111724440001 rwlF ;'t' y •v ........ret.� y . 1: : r' 053-0611723330005 ��-' P'+.��4,`51"':+i4, i • W '4 - -;y.. f --A 053-0611723330003 �- "` • ''' , - '. � *: * 1-WET ::t.... a ° , _ 1-UP +� ,...„..4.,.„.,„,,,_ _ k .. °`' ... W +' LI Ce • . " ryc { - t053-0611723330002 i rr',fl;4r i «. + -'+e h. ° �` i ~ r'' ` �'... 1 t .+' ` �'" 4.art.," a ,a• Z - +•1 ,,. • , �l 'h‘ilt -!. 18 4 SI- m y s4> r p, j -..* �: J ", ' ..h m- -=*, iN`w i .1„ paT ♦ „ t .p Y t p v r 3 tl 5 a ytiox- - �i r. a,,,,174Y7'74,‘,%"%;,,,` of _- t„Ivy, yt,a ., ,- �� 1'11' 2-WET .'-.4.' 2-UP ¢ 053-0611723330006 l #'#k ,y - - 053-0111724440002 , '.- y -. �F - ° .w, ;: 053-0611723330004 t •,.°1 1 ,i.' Wetland Size -� fr ! :. �..,._ ' ;� 37,522 SF y'. i ° , k te, _ �_ ,a»>=COUNTY ROAD 151 �. �,.+,. - �.,,:. ° r; • A•+aa� � . 053-1211724110001 t- �. .�_ - ; _., . _._ Mound,Hennepin County,Minnesota Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. Phone:(612)-802-6619 sl w 0 50 100 200 E-matl:jacobsonenv@msn.com Figure 5 �°N”"a^ Date 9 2o1a16z 02-02-2016 Feet 1.10X Name Project No Wetland Delineation Map 6760 West Branch Rem 10563 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/11/2016 1.1 'tie, f1 a r , :A 4.• 'R,c• ;1, ,. `t , 7 I nh law r r, F fC,41 ' s's.. � s w. • ir xw # i= i� f.V a. M., 4 w s r t N Q * _ Kf a, s I a<,. s 1 inch =200 feet PARCEL ID: 0611723330002 Comments: OWNER NAME: M K &C H Rodewald Figure 6 -Site Location Map PARCEL ADDRESS: 4760 West Branch Rd, Orono MN 55364 PARCEL AREA: 5.09 acres, 221,568 sq ft A-T-B:Abstract SALE PRICE: $140,000 SALE DATA: 02/1997 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or ASSESSED 2015, PAYABLE 2016 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no PROPERTY TYPE: Residential warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitab le for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD: Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any MARKET VALUE: $438,000 damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: $4,724.38 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 COUNTY 2016 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $449,000 3 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota 3 4 (Figure 7-Hydric Soil Rating) fR M 449090 449120 449150 449180 449210 449240 44°57 57'N 8 44°57 57'N rS_ a a i M 1i H t R Ilis# , 1 ,r 4R (:I . tl 11192a 4110610t, a a 't Ia e 111 i eN ' + # .Y 'IL40Br r is ', rn. A I $, I� ! tv 0 v U 144‘,./'j f,• s -4P. 1 L36A _:_ K r, cf fu, .1s v sui. 5,. 151 W,Branch Rd _ • - aY "Z 4t } r r +W 44°57 49"N F It 0, 44°5749'N 449090 449120 449150 449180 449210 449240 3 3 Map Scale:1:1,190 if nted on A pri portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet Meters N 0 15 30 60 90 rn A 0 50 100 200 300 Map Protection:Web Narrator Gomer coordinates:WGS84 Feet Edge tics:UTI Zone 15N WGS84 USDA�_ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 7-Hydric Soil Rating) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(A01) Transportation The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. I Area of Interest(AOI) Rails Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils Interstate Highways Soil Rating Polygons Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause US Routes misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line 0 Hydric(100%) Major Roads placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Q Hydric(66 to 99%) soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Local Roads 0 Hydric(33 to 65%) Background Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Hydric(1 to 32%) 111 measurements. Aerial Photography 0 Not Hydric(0%) Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Not rated or not available Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Soil Rating Lines Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator r0. Hydric(100%) projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts .-. Hydric(66 to 99%) distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate • • Hydric(33 to 65%) calculations of distance or area are required. .nr Hydric(1 to 32%) This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of •.r Not Hydric(0%) the version date(s)listed below. • • Not rated or not available Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County,Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11,Sep 18,2015 Soil Rating Points Hydric(100%) Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. • Hydric(66 to 99%) Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 16,2012—Apr 6, ▪ Hydric(33 to 65%) 2012 ® Hydric(1 to 32%) The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Not Hydric(0%) compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting p Not rated or not available of map unit boundaries may be evident. Water Features Streams and Canals USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 7-Hydric Soil Rating Hydric Rating by Map Unit Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Summary by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota(MN053) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel 45 1.9 26.8% complex,0 to 3 percent slopes L40B Angus-Kilkenny 5 1.8 25.9% complex,2 to 6 percent slopes L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny 5 1.7 24.4% complex,6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded L49A Klossner soils, 100 1.6 22.9% depressional,0 to 1 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 7.1 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/11/2016 00111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 APPENDIX A Precipitation Data 7/20/2016 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota Climatology Working Group :D State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Stubbs Bay section number: 6 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Monday, July 11, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches first prior second prior third prior A'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived month: month: month: from radar-based estimates. June May 2016 April 2016 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: 4.06 2.51 3.30 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 3.24 2.36 1.92 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 5.45 3.96 2.83 type of month: dry normal wet normal normal wet monthly score 3 * 2 =.6 2 * 2 = 4 1 * 3 = 3 multi-month score: 13 - Normal 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Other Resources: • retrieve daily precipitation data • view radar-based precipitation estimates • view weekly precipitation maps • Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) http://climate.um n.edu/gridded_data/preci p/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm 83=449915&passYutm 83=4979962&passcounty=Hennepin&passcounty_num ber=... 1/1 7/20/2016 High DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Minnesota Climatology Working Group -TD State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search ID Nearest Station Precipitation Data Retrieval Minnesota's precipitation data archive is searched for data closest to a selected target location for each month. Values from the site closest to the target location are returned below after clicking the retrieve monthly data or retrieve daily data buttons. The precipitation data are made up of measured rainfall and the measured liquid content of snowfall. Temperature, snowfall, and snow depth data from National Weather Service reporting stations are no longer retrieved from this application. To obtain those data, see our newest data retrieval tool (May 2014). National Weather Service precipitation data continue to be available from this application. Obtaining data for legal purposes Guide for column headers in the data table target location: Hennepin-Excelsior-Stubbs Bay 117N 23W S6 (latitude: 44.97133 longitude: 93.63515) ! click to select target location years: [2016 •1 to 2016 • ' number of missing days allowed per month: 3 j retrieve monthly data]rretrieve daily data results: Target: T117 R23 S6 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn 00000000 pre (inches) dis Jan 2016 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG .25 4 mi . Feb 2016 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG .90 4 mi . Mar 2016 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG 1.18 4 mi . Apr 2016 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG 2.95 4 mi . May 2016 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG 2.15 4 mi . Jun 2016 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG 4.06 4 mi . Jul 2016 m 999 mi . Aug 2016 m 999 mi . Sep 2016 m 999 mi . Oct 2016 m 999 mi . Nov 2016 m 999 mi . Dec 2016 m 999 mi . Where indicated: Missing values are shown as'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as'-'. 'TTTT RR SS' is the'public land survey(PLS)' or'legal' location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC 'TIC' locations plus 100. 'NWS ID' the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the'PLS will always be correct for precipitation data while the'NWS ID'will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the'NWS ID' number applies to all shown data. State Climatology Office - MnDNR - Ecological and Water Resources http://climate.umn.edu/H1Dradius/radius_new.asp 1/1 APPENDIX B Sample Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 4760 W Branch Rd City/County: Orono Sampling Date: 7/11/16 Applicant/Owner: Mike Rodewald State: MN Sampling Point: 1-UP Investigator(s): WEJ&CMC vection,Township, Range: Sec.6,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): convex Slope(%): 2% Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam(Hamel JWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year% Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N , or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil , or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 55 x 3= 165 5 FACU species 40 x 4= 160 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 95 (A) 325 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 55 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.42 2 Trifolium repens 10 N FACU 3 Lotus corniculatus 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Glechoma hederacea 10 N FACU Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Digitaria sanguinalis 5 N FACU X-Dominance test is>50% 6 Taraxacum officinale 5 N FACU -Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR3/2 100 sandy loam 8-18 10YR2/2 100 loam 18-24 10YR2/1 100 loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M=M2 Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) -Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) —High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) -Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) -Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site4760 W Branch Rd City/County: Orono Sampling Date: 7/11/16 Applicant/Owner: Mike Rodewald State: MN Sampling Point: 1-WET Investigator(s): WEJ&CMC >ection,Township, Range: Sec.6,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): depression Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave Slope(%): 1% Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam Hamel JWI Classification: PEMBd Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year% Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N , soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 90 x 2= 180 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 5 x 4= 20 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 95 (A) 200 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.11 2 Solidago altissima 5 N FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 _ X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam 12-24 10YR4/1 98 7.5YR4/2 2 C PL clay loam *Type:C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Mz Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) -Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) —High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) -Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(35) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) -Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 16 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 4760 W Branch Rd City/County: Orono Sampling Date: 7/11/16 Applicant/Owner: Mike Rodewald State: MN iampling Point: 2-UP Investigator(s): WEJ&CMC lection,Township, Range: Sec.6,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): convex Slope(%): 2% Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam(Klossner !WI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year% Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Juglans nigra 20 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Acer negundo 20 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 6 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) 40 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 60 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 130 x 3= 390 5 FACU species 60 x 4= 240 60 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 190 (A) 630 (B) 1 Rhamnus cathartica 40 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.32 2 Glechoma hederacea 20 Y FACU 3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 20 Y FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Galium boreale 5 N FAC Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Hydrophyllum virginianum 5 N FAC Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8_ _ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 90 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 5% bare ground at this sample point US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR3/2 100 sandy loam 8-16 10YR2/1 100 loam 16-24 10YR4/1 100 clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M =Ms Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) -Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) — High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) -Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) -Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) -Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) -Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site 4760 W Branch Rd City/County: Orono Sampling Date: 7/11/16 Applicant/Owner: Mike Rodewald State: MN >ampling Point: 2-WET Investigator(s): WEJ&CMC lection,Township, Range: Sec.6,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2% Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam(Klossner IWI Classification: PEMBd Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year% Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil , or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Salix nigra 20 Y OBL that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 20 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 40 x 1 = 40 3 FACW species 70 x 2= 140 4 FAC species 20 x 3= 60 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 130 (A) 240 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.85 2 Impatiens capensis 30 Y FACW 3 Lemna minor 20 Y OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X-Dominance test is>50% 6 X-Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 90 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 5% bare ground at this sample point US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR2/1 100 mucky loam sulfitic 6-24 10YR4/1 100 clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=ME Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) –T Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) -Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) —Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position(D2) -Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) -Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) -Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region APPENDIX C Site Photographs , Y . . .-',., * .‘,„4, I ;0. r , r ^ #� A ':I '' IP IP 44 N� �� file - t /� ;. wn.°> 1 t,,�" �� '4,11 `yr' `. t 4 r • i rt" ;I'e . • • +ji, + v , d .�+ ;�R > l 'nt ` t•ri tot r = * •1 ' r- 6�` r`ilk, i� 1`f R:R� 4 „ 1}.t f +`'`/ x,.bl, �, ff. s }i 9 i @ "` te : '- ^ _ + '.t i r ! . �s., . �.. '. +w ,nx°, .�y;y^: ,44,0,- ;,0. , ,te'," ';:',,',,, , A;y:',' t 7,i)„ ..,.,,. ,.•,, . ,,, , r..., . -, t, ,.• f.. .il �r , � � � 7�� ; i,`} F '� Fn� � its t ' F } b.AQ P �.. _ f )rthern portion of Basin 1 facing West Basin 1 facing West t . - 4 Alto { ' ' ' t'14.'. ',,,kg. i , ., .,4 '. ,'l s � . itet Basin 1 facing Southwest Basin 1 facing West APPENDIX D Wetland Delineation Approval Forms Project Name and/or Number: PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership,etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Mike Rodewald Mailing Address: 4760 W. Branch Rd, Orono, MN 55364 Phone: 952-472-5372 E-mail Address: Mike.rodewald@lambtonquay.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Wayne Jacobson,WPC, PSS,Jacobson Environmental Mailing Address: 5821 Humboldt Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: (612)802-6619 E-mail Address: jacobsonenv@msn.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 4760 W Branch Rd, Orono, MN 55364 Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): Sec. 6,T117N, R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. See Figure 6 Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 5.09 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Project Name and/or Number: PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact'. Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below.Include all anticipated impacts,including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s)of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Type of Impact Duration of County,Major Aquatic Existing Plant Aquatic Resource (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Size of Watershed#, Resource Type Community ID(as noted on drain,or Permanent(P) Size of Impact2 Aquatic and Bank (wetland, lake, a Type(s) in overhead view) remove or Temporary Resource Service Area# tributary etc.) Impact Area s vegetation) (T)' of Impact Area 'If impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". 2lmpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the Bowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet). 'This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". °Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3"4 Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below,I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature. Gt/(, Date: I hereby authorize Wayne Jacobson to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request,supplemental information in support of this application. e � VJa} e E Jacobso. 'The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. _ 1 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply): X❑Wetland Type Confirmation E Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). ❑X Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. n Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationiDGuidance.aspx