HomeMy WebLinkAboutW19-18 TEP Findings1 TEP Findings should be a meaningful concise summary detailing the project conditions, technical data, and what rules apply.
The TEP recommendation should be clear,based on rule and best professional judgement.
Rev. 12/17/2013
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Technical Evaluation Panel Findings Report
Date(s) of Site
Visit/Meeting: September 4, 2019 LGU: MCWD
County: Hennepin LGU Contact: Erin Manlick
Project Name: W19-18 2740 White Oak Circle Phone #: 952-641-4586
Location of Project:
(attach map if possible) 2740 White Oak Circle, Orono Email
Address: EManlick@minnehahacreek.org
TEP ATTENDEES: OTHER ATTENDEES: OTHER ATTENDEES:
LGU: Erin Manlick, MCWD Mark Kjolhaug - Kjolhaug
Environmental
SWCD: Stacey Lijewski Tim Johnson - Livit Site + Structure
BWSR: Ben Carlson Karen Berrell - Property Owner
DNR: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING: The Applicant submitted a boundary and type application dated August 13, 2019 for the above referenced property. The TEP met on-site to review two wetland boundaries in the field as well as discuss a proposed landscaping plan to
prevent flooding on the property.
TYPE OF MEETING: Check all applicable
Office On-Site Phone Conference E-Mail Other:
TEP FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1:
The TEP found that the two wetlands identified in the delineation report met criteria for wetland characteristics and
both boundaries located were confirmed. It was agreed upon that Wetland 1 may have encroached westward in recent
years and that a no-loss status might be claimed by the property owner as a result of incidental wetland. The TEP
agreed that supporting materials, including historical aerial imagery and evidence of altered drainage upstream, would
be needed to prove an incidental wetland. Next steps to be taken by the property owner and/or their representatives
are to modify the existing, or submit a new, WCA application requesting a no-loss determination for incidental status of
Wetland 1.
SIGNATURES
9/10/19
SWCD Representative Date BWSR Representative Date
Do not concur Do not concur
1 TEP Findings should be a meaningful concise summary detailing the project conditions, technical data, and what rules apply.
The TEP recommendation should be clear,based on rule and best professional judgement.
Rev. 12/17/2013
LGU Representative Date DNR Representative Date
Do not concur Do not concur