Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-16-2018 Planning Commission PacketAGENDA City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for April 16, 2018; 6:30 PM Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Council Representative: Wendy Danke Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet — located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. New Business 1. Oath of Office Bob Erickson Dennis Libby Jon Ressler 2. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2018. 3. LA18-000033 Jeff Martineau, 1335 Arbor Street, Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) (18-4000) 4. LA18-000012 Mark Stipakov, 2150 Sixth Avenue North, Subdivision Resolution Amendment (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA18-000034 Apex Holding, LLC, 2635 Kelley Parkway, Final Plat, Final Master Development Plan and Rezoning (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. LA18-000035 K. Ryan Hasse, 3800 Shoreline Drive, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review (Staff: Laura Oakden) 7. LA18-000036 Orono Apartments, LLC, 2745 Kelley Parkway, Site Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 8. LA18-000024 City of Orono, Text Amendment to Sections 78-1 and 82-2 related to zoning and subdivision definitions, including in-kind, dry buildable and others (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 9. Update on March 12, 2018 City Council meeting. 10. Planning Commission Liaison for May 14, 2018 Council Meeting: Jon Ressler 11. Other issues for discussion. Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notifications J I t3 a` 'Pa Park c. t! II I I Q � r BYO in - 6■N■q■11■IN N■fi■Ii.q■11 ■Ii■f1.1!■11■N■IIMI.11■tib/NNIriN magn1mI I'UllmanLae Jam// ■II.H�f rr11r//fff■� A"Rey yF `, 11"kE0� SH ' ttr11■N■N.11■q■i 1 ■N■q� I I.N.1/■ 11 ■11■11l11 6 th& e N a i ICY CA18-000012 AGENDA + Oro1-to City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for +Legend ; City Limits April 16, 2018; 6:30 PM '- LA18-000036 Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, hAQt18-0035 tom take Orono, MN 55356 n � "�"'" }"■"fir. _ iy* �,pIIC A`hva fCul Slat- 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us r BIYO Council Representative: Wendy Danke o `s New Business 1. Oath of Office 44MLm�J Bob Erickson t.. B Sidtt"* 140%,"40,010 • Dennis Libby �+ '+..A inM+iJiq■11■"■■Ii Jon Ressler i #f.■,■ w 2. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2018. Ask 3. LA18-000033 Jeff Martineau, (18-4000) 1335 Arbor Street, too# Fox St---, Orono I �...� Variances o (Staff: Laura Oakden) County Road 151- west Branch Rd fey c� �. 4. LA18-000012 Mark Stipakov, 12160 Ut Sixth Avenue N, ° Subdivision Resolution Amendment For,E; t X Reach take ! (Staff: Melanie Curtis) �a1e (0 i 5. LA18-000034 Apex Holding, LLC, ,#A18-000033 (18-4000) 2635 Kelley Parkway, Final Plat, Final Master �'°rth 5norr Development Plan and Rezoning *{ (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Ole� 6. LA18-000035 K. Ryan Hasse, a�►,���� 3800 Shoreline Drive, �,*` - Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review ► , 1 tbtl i�° ton{ a Beat_ s = (Staff: Laura Oakden) LLC, 7. LA18-000036 Orono Apartments,i j y _ ��"�11���...■II+IPS -- 1 r 2745 Kelley Parkway, ��tyt4al,e arc+��rlli Pari O° � ° - j - i Site Plan, Comprehensive Plan ,//��. ��—�0'IJ� iiq■It■11■fit■V- � a Amendment and Rezoning :....... ......�.f,.`# ti}• (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) �� ��. .. ,� %* ;> T �ale Map mNae #, Disclaimer: This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a BOLTON survey is is not intended to co used fo one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data 0 2,240 Feet I & M E N K city, county, and state offices, and other located a affecting sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. © Bolton &Men k, Inc -Web GIS 4/13/2018 11:14 AM Real People. Real Solutions. Item 1 CITY OF ORONO MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 2018 TO: Chair Thiesse, Planning Commissioners Dustin Rief, City Administrator FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director RE: Oaths of Office New Commissioners Jon Ressler, Dennis Libby, and Bob Erickson will be sworn in at the beginning of the meeting on Monday, April 16t" I will administer the Oath to each of the Commissioners, concurrently `RkES H0 OATH OF OFFICE State of Minnesota ss. County of Hennepin I, , do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Minnesota, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the Office of Planning Commissioner of the City of Orono in the County of Hennepin, the State of Minnesota, to the best of my judgment and ability. Signature Subscribed before me this 16th day of April, 2018. (stamp) Signature Item 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Kevin Landgraver, Bruce Lemke, Denise Leskinen, Loren Schoenzeit, and Jon Schwingler. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planners Melanie Curtis and Laura Oakden, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Dennis Walsh was present. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Thiesse thanked Loren Schoenzeit, Jon Schwingler, and Denise Leskinen for each of their nine years of service on the Orono Planning Commission. NEW BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 12, 2018 Leskinen moved, Landgraver seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of February 12, 2018, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 2. 18-3996 GEORGE STICKNEY, 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH, PRELIMINARY PLAT, 6:33 P.M. — 7:03 P.M. George Stickney, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a residential subdivision of the 20.5 -acre property to create one additional 5 -acre lot for a single-family home. The plat is proposed as a front/back lot subdivision with a private drive outlot. Flexibility regarding the average lakeshore setback requirements as applied to Lot 1 is being requested by the applicant. Page 1 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. The existing property has a home, a guest house, and barn located on the property, all of which will remain following the subdivision. The property is zoned LR-lA with a two -acre minimum. As proposed, the plat is less dense than the prescribed minimum density contemplated within the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is proposing that the existing horseshoe driveway configuration would remain as it serves the existing home and the two vacant lots situation between the subject property and the properties on Little Orchard Way. The northern portion of the horseshoe driveway will be upgraded in width and contained within an outlot to serve as the private shared driveway access for the new Lot 1 and the existing home on Lot 2. Comments were received from Hennepin County today regarding the application and have been provided to the Planning Commission for their review. There is an existing city sewer line located in Old Crystal Bay Road South directly abutting the property. Because sewer is available, the lots should be served by City sewer and private water supply wells. The applicant has designed septic systems that do conform to serve both of the lots and has requested a waiver from the sewer connection requirement until such time as the property is further developed. The preliminary plat reflects the applicant's requested flexibility with regards to the average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback requirement is determined by the existing home at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South and the home at 3051 Farview Lane. The applicant is requesting a waiver to permit the home on Lot 1 to be as close as 80 feet from the ordinary high-water level. A 30 -foot wide private driveway outlot has been provided. Hennepin County has requested an additional 17 feet of right-of-way as detailed in their comments. The Planning Commission should discuss the application and provide comments with regard to the air- conditioning units, the average lakeshore setback request, the septic line, the requirements of the MCWD, and the comments submitted by Hennepin County. Planning Staff recommends approval conditioned upon the recommendations of the City Engineer as well as the requirements of the MCWD. The Planning Commission should make a recommendation regarding the sewer connection. Landgraver asked if there is a bluff on the property. Page 2 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis indicated there is not. George Stickney, Applicant, stated they are attempting to preserve what has existed for 100 -plus years and takes 20.5 acres and only creates one new lot. Stickney stated the lot is more than conforming at 5.7 acres. The roadway on Outlot A will act as a driveway and has been there for over 107 years. The entry monuments are within that outlot as well. Stickney stated in response to some of the comments received today, he would note that the existing entry monument in the front is 43 -plus feet away from the right-of-way. The main structure starts at 40 feet and then horseshoes toward Old Crystal Bay Road, which results in it being approximately 30 feet from the right-of-way. Stickney stated currently the distance is 420 feet wide, with Hennepin County suggesting 660 feet of width for safe passage. Stickney noted there are three to four driveways across the street, and as it relates to the line of sight, he is able to see more than a half a mile to the north and then past Fox Street and all the way down to Carpenter Road before there is a sightline issue. Stickney indicated he has compacted ground to work with on the driveway since it has been used for 107 years and that they will make it better by increasing the width to 15 feet wide. In addition, the area next to the road will be landscaped. There will also be covenants covering the north boundary consisting of a 10 -foot tree preservation area where no trees can be cut, which will further buffer the homeowners on the north side of the property. There is also a 10 -foot tree preservation agreement between the two lots. Stickney commented this is a unique development because there will only be one septic site. As it relates to sewer, Stickney noted the outlot runs almost 1,000 feet and then they would have to add another 500 feet of sewer line to the new house, which is exorbitant for two homes on 20 -plus acres. Stickney stated they would also have to incur a lot more costs with a lift station and grinder pumps as well as having to remove additional trees. Stickney indicated this proposal has one septic site in excess of 340 feet from the lake with numerous alternate sites being available. Stickney stated the only time a septic site will fail is when the installer inadvertently compacts the ground. Stickney stated they are taking a very conservative approach to the development and that by connecting the horseshoe to the new driveway will let the property owner reach the guest house and barn. Stickney stated in his view it is a better proposal for fire trucks and other vehicles. The apron near the home is for extra parking and safety. Stickney stated the development will be very private and secluded and the neighbors will not know anything has changed. Page 3 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse requested Mr. Stickney address the issue of the AC units. Stickney indicated the owner would love to have those stay and that they would work out an easement with the owner of the new lot. Stickney stated the building has been there a long time and is very well built and located in the woods. Thiesse asked what will happen to the trees between the house and the lake. Stickney indicated they will clear a site pad and that they are only building one house, one driveway, and one septic site. Stickney stated if the lot was to be further subdivided, then a sewer line might be appropriate, but that there is a big buffer in between the sewer site and the lake. Judson Dayton, Applicant, stated this is not a development but is merely taking one piece of property and placing a house on a large parcel. Dayton stated normally sewer lines are connected to multiple new homes and that the current house is hooked up to a drain field and septic system. If the waiver is not granted, it would be necessary to bring in sewer almost 1,500 feet for one house. Dayton stated they have performed all the septic tests and have plenty of alternative sites available. Dayton stated he would be happy to address the sewer issue at the time more homes are built. Landgraver noted the Watershed District has raised the issue of the two adjacent lots, with a question towards whether those will be developed. Landgraver asked what the intent is for those two adjacent lots. Curtis pointed out the two adjacent lots. Curtis noted they are existing lots that can be built on today with septic systems and are not part of the subdivision. The Watershed District is looking at it with regard to ownership status. Curtis stated to her understanding that is still being discussed from a watershed rules standpoint. Stickney noted the Watershed District also saw an earlier plan that depicted two homes. Landgraver asked if the two adjacent lots are required to be hooked up to city sewer. Curtis indicated they are not. Lemke asked whether there is any septic system for the horse barn. Dayton stated the barn connects into the guest house and there is a septic system there. Dayton indicated it is not a permanent residence and there are no horses. Lemke asked whether it is a totally separate system from the house. Page 4 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Dayton indicated it is. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. Landgraver stated in his view there are extenuating circumstances for the average lakeshore setback and that it will not block any views due to the trees. Landgraver stated he is comfortable approving a variance. Thiesse indicated he is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver. Dayton noted they were granted a variance ten years ago, which was extended for another year or two, but that they never received any offers on the land so the plat was never filed. Dayton stated in his view there is precedent to approve the average lakeshore setback variance. Leskinen and Schwingler indicated they are in agreement with the comments made about the average lakeshore setback. Lemke stated it seems like a long way to extend the sewer for one house and that perhaps it would be more appropriate if the land was subdivided in the future. Schoenzeit stated as long as the City Engineer feels the existing two septic sites do not need to be replaced, then he would be okay with not extending the sewer. Thiesse indicated he is in agreement. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission could recommend that if the situation changes, the septic situation be looked at again. Leskinen stated she is in agreement, noting that there are alternative sites available. Thiesse asked what the AC units are serving. Dayton indicated 20 -plus years ago the air-conditioning units were moved further away from the home and placed on a concrete slab inside an old structure to keep them out of sight and to block the sound. The air-conditioning units are now located on the new lot line, and if the buyers are willing to leave them there, Dayton stated they would like to leave them there. Page 5 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse asked if there is a well on the other side of the property. Dayton indicated that is a well with a pump that keeps the pond at a consistent level and that there will be an easement for the well so they can keep the pump. Schoenzeit stated if that equipment is more than 10 years old, they should consider replacing it with newer equipment since the newer equipment is silent and super energy efficient and will pay for itself in about four years. Thiesse asked if the City is amenable to an easement or whether the line should be redrawn. Landgraver stated that begs the question of why the line is not drawn to the side of it to get around this issue. Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, noted the topography drops off quite a bit to the west and that relocating the line would require a lot more fill and grading on the west end. Schwingler stated he does not have a problem with the air-conditioning units and that it should be left up to the future buyer. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they would be comfortable with an easement for the air-conditioning units. Schoenzeit stated as it relates to the road and safety, the Planning Commission does not have the flexibility to approve the monuments and that Hennepin County will need to make the final decision. Thiesse asked whether the monuments are going to be in the right-of-way. Stickney stated the front entrance gate is 40 feet from the center of the road and that they are adequately placed for a 33 -foot right-of-way. Stickney stated the issue is that they start curving toward the road so the two wings are within 25 feet of the roadway. Stickney noted if you go north to Crystal Bay Preserve, there are two newer entry monuments that are 25 feet from the right-of-way and that there are other monuments on the street that are the same way. Stickney stated the monuments are old and that they would like to preserve as much of it as they can. Thiesse stated with regard to the items related to Hennepin County, the City has no control over. Schoenzeit stated one issue is an easement for a potential trail and that this is an opportunity to preserve that. Page 6 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated the City is recommending a joint 10 -foot trail and utility easement be granted and that Hennepin County is asking for seven more feet. Schwingler moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 18-3996, George Stickney, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South, granting of subdivision/preliminary plat approval per Staff recommendation and conditioned upon the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer being met. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 3. LA18-000013 NATHAN VANCAMP, 601 MINNETONKA HIGHLAND LANE, VARIANCE, 7:03 P.M. — 7:08 P.M. Nathan VanCamp, Applicant, was present. Oakden stated the applicant is proposing to build an addition to an existing home and is requesting a rear yard setback variance. The home is surrounded by three streets and the applicant is proposing to build the addition towards the one shared lot line away from all the streets. This shared lot line is considered the rear yard and has a 30 -foot setback in the LR -IB zoning district. The addition would be located 18.8 feet from the rear property line. The current setback is 40.8 feet. The proposal meets the structural and hardcover requirements. Staff finds there are inherent practical difficulties that exist with the location of the wetland and the close proximity of the right-of-way on three sides of the lot. Due to the orientation of the home, the rear yard acts as a side yard for the property owner and neighboring residents. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. The neighboring property owners have submitted the acknowledgement form and are in support of the project. Planning Staff recommends approval of the rear yard setback variance. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Nathan VanCamp, Applicant, stated he has nothing further to add to Staff's report and that the neighbors are supportive of the project. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Page 7 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver commented the application is pretty straight forward. Leskinen moved, Schwingler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LAI 8-000013, Nathan VanCamp, 601 Minnetonka Highland Lane, granting of a rear yard setback variance per Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 4. LA18-000015 MICHAEL JONES, 3186 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCES, 7:08 P.M. — 7:18 P.M. Michael Jones, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated a new residence was constructed on the lot in 2009. At this time the applicant is requesting a hardcover variance in order to reconstruct an existing non -conforming detached garage in a conforming location. The existing garage does not have an existing improved (paved) driveway and the new driveway would require additional hardcover. The proposed hardcover level would not exceed the existing level and does include the new driveway. The applicant is proposing to stay within the 28 percent hardcover. Staff has conducted a practical difficulties analysis which is contained in Staff's report for review by the Planning Commission. Staff finds practical difficulties exist due to the property's unique shape and size. The existing detached garage can be legally reconstructed in the same footprint and location. While it does not exist currently, the assumed hardcover serving the existing garage could be constructed at any time by the property owner. The permitting requirements apply if the project results in over 50 cubic yards of disturbance. Therefore, the applicant's argument regarding the use of the total assumed hardcover as "existing" hardcover level may be reasonable. Public comments have been received and are included in the Commissioners' packets. Planning Staff supports the variance request. Lemke asked what the height of the existing garage is versus the new garage. Page 8 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated the applicant would be able to answer that question. Landgraver noted the new garage is significantly larger. Landgraver asked if the reason the hardcover is not more than what currently exists is because the driveway has been shortened. Curtis indicated it is and that the larger garage would be more functional for the applicant Michael Jones, Applicant, stated his plan was to try to make it a win situation for himself, the neighbors, and the City. Jones stated he is guessing the structure was constructed around 1930 and is located 5.9 feet from the property line to the west. The original plan was to rehabilitate the property and fix it up but the foundation for the garage has been crumbling for years. In addition to the poor foundation, the roof leaks, and so it is not worth saving at this point. Jones stated as a result, he looked at different options for what could be done. Jones stated he can commit to the City that the hardcover will be reduced on the property. Jones noted there have been significant improvements on the neighboring properties, and that now that area has been cleared out, the garage is more visible and is an eyesore. Jones stated he would like to remove it and replace it with a new structure that is consistent with the new home. Jones noted attached to the proposed apron is a driveway turnaround, which was not made large enough at the time the house was built. By attaching it in this location, it makes that turnaround a little larger and easier to maneuver. Jones indicated he does not know the exact height of the existing garage but that the new garage would match the height of the existing garage. Jones stated if that red piece was eliminated, he would be at 23.7 percent hardcover but he understands that that access is part of his property. Jones stated he also has talked to several of his neighbors and everyone is in support of the project. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Page 9 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. Leskinen commented it is a reasonable request and that the homeowner has made a strong case for the practical difficulty that exists with the lot. Leskinen stated she also appreciates that the other encroachment issues will be resolved and the setbacks will be met. Lemke commented it is an attractive improvement to the property. Landgraver stated part of him would like to try to reduce the hardcover further but that the larger turnaround is needed for safe access down to the street. Thiesse stated he also had the same thought but that the applicant is dropping the overall hardcover by around 300 feet even with the larger turnaround. Thiesse stated the practical difficulty is the need for safe access onto the street, which the turnaround accomplishes. Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LAI 8-000015, Michael Jones, 3186 North Shore Drive, granting of a hardcover variance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5. LA18-000016 DALE GUSTAFSON, 1370 CHERRY PLACE, VARIANCES, 7:18 P.M. — 7:35 P.M. Dale Gustafson, Applicant, was present. Oakden stated the applicant has submitted an application to add retaining walls and landscaping to the shoreline of the property located at 1370 Cherry Place. The property abuts Lake Minnetonka and has a slope along the shoreline. There are currently stairs leading down the slope creating access to the lake. These stairs would be removed as part of the project and new stairs would be constructed. There is also an existing boathouse the applicant is proposing to retain. Retaining walls are not permitted within 75 feet of the lake. As a result, the applicant is requesting a setback and hardcover variance. The applicant proposes to build new stairs to the lake around the boathouse and add retaining walls to support the slope. The plan includes multiple retaining walls running along the stairs and running along the slope. Oakden illustrated the location of the existing stairs and the proposed retaining walls. The applicant is proposing 17.9 percent hardcover in the lake yard. To date one comment against building in the lake yard in general has been received. Page 10 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the applicant has met the standards for a practical difficulty to warrant a variance and whether the applicant has made an attempt to meet the City standards for stair access to the lake. Staff is recommending approval of the project, with screening of all the retaining walls be required to preserve the natural look of the shoreline when viewed from the lake. Schoenzeit asked whether there are any elevation drawings. Oakden stated there are no cross-sections of the plans but that essentially the applicant is looking to install stairs that would be embedded into the slope. The retaining walls are being requested to hold back earth. Schoenzeit asked if the retaining walls exceed four feet. Oakden stated the elevations vary but none of the rocks will exceed four feet. Dale Gustafson, applicant, stated he is the landscape designer for this project and that this lot is a typical kind of problematic lakeshore lot with a steep bank. Currently the slope is just a collection of weeds and invasive trees and that there is the typical problem with trying to maintain that. In addition, the existing stairway is beginning to deteriorate and needs to be replaced in some shape, manner or form. The walls that were originally installed were substandard and the stairs going down to the boathouse are sinking and are not very safe or useful. Gustafson stated it is the property owner's plan to resurface and redo the boathouse and then install the stones more into the ground. Gustafson indicated they are anticipating using granite slabs. The retaining walls are simply to retain the soil on either side of the stairs. Gustafson noted as someone comes up the stairs, the wall might be nonexistent on one side and on the other side it could be two feet high. Gustafson stated the idea is to plant vegetation around the retaining walls and stairs so they are not very visible. Oakden displayed a picture of a sample stone stairway. Gustafson indicated it would consist more of stone outcroppings to control the slope. Thiesse asked if it will be similar to what is depicted. Page 11 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gustafson stated it will be. Gustafson pointed out the boathouse will block the view of the stairs from one side of the lake. Gustafson stated at this time of the year there is not much vegetation but that they do plan on putting some wooded shrubs in there to help screen it during the winter. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. Thiesse stated it does not appear there is a railing around the boathouse at the top or access. Gustafson indicated the access will be up at the top of the boathouse and is depicted on the plan. The access will consist of three stepping stones and there will be a railing around there. Lemke commented it is an improvement from what is there now and that what currently is there is not very attractive or safe. Landgraver stated his initial reaction was that the snaking design creates the need for the retaining walls and that a stairway straight down would requires less hardcover. Landgraver stated the mitigating factor is the fact that it comes down and goes behind the boathouse, which helps reduce the massing effect. Thiesse stated he is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver and that he is not a big proponent of wooden stairs. Leskinen stated the look of the stone stairs with the plants around it is an improvement but that she has a concern with the amount of hardcover and whether that might speed up the runoff down to the lake. Schoenzeit questioned whether the overall project should be reviewed by the City Engineer even though it is under four feet. Oakden stated if it under four feet, the applicant would need to submit plans for a zoning permit but it would not be reviewed by the City Engineer. Thiesse asked if the City Engineer looks at all applications. Schoenzeit commented it would be nice to have it vetted by an engineer and that the Planning Commission could encourage the applicant to supply documentation. Page 12 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated the City Engineer will review the grading and drainage but that he will not look at a retaining wall that is less than four feet in height. Gustafson stated the stairway and wall will be constructed from a barge off the lake. Gustafson stated when the bigger rocks are placed to retain the grade, there will be drainage rock behind them, which will help capture some of the water. If the stairway is straight, the water will go straight down and lead to erosion. Gustafson noted they will have to do some slight grading and that they will add more vegetation to help hold the bank in there. Gustafson stated the company has been around a long time and that they want to do it right the first time around so repairs do not need to be made. Lemke moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000016, Dale Gustafson, 1370 Cherry Place, granting of a 0-75 foot lake setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 6. LAI 8-000019 MARK WILLIAMS, 2697 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCE, 7:35 P.M. — 7:58 P.M. Mark Williams, Applicant, was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance, a 75 -foot lake yard setback, a hardcover variance, and lot area and lot width variances in order to construct a new single- family house. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing house and construct a new house. This lakeshore lot is lower in the street third of the lot, forming a bowl on the back end of the lot, which limits the building envelope of the lot. The new proposed home sits partially within the footprint of the existing home. The applicant is asking for variances to center the home on the lot, which creates a new encroachment into the 75 -foot lake yard with the porch and corresponding hardcover. The applicant is also proposing to move the home back from 61 feet from the ordinary high-water level to 64.5 feet. To meet the average lakeshore setback, they would need to be 66 feet from the OHWL, which is the same distance as their neighbors to the south. The lot to the north is currently vacant. The new structure will consist of approximately 140 square feet of the single -story porch within the 75 - foot lake yard and roughly 30 square feet in the average lake setback where no structure currently exists. Page 13 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the minimal encroachments are appropriate given the location of the existing structure and the distance of neighboring properties from the lake. The new home meets the structural and hardcover requirements. The applicant should also be required to meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. Landgraver requested a bird's eye view of this property and the neighboring property be shown. Oakden displayed an overhead view of the area and noted the current property is very similar to the neighboring properties on either side. Access is gained through the property to the north. Mark Williams, Applicant, stated he represents the property owners. Staff report states that the overall hardcover will be reduced but the number is incorrect. Williams indicated they will be doing a 5 percent overall hardcover reduction resulting in 25 percent hardcover. Williams noted in 2001 the neighbor was granted a variance. Williams stated the hill is very steep and oftentimes in the winter guests have to park on the street. Because of the location of the existing garage, there are times they cannot drive out of there and the new garage will be end -loading, which would allow for more room. The existing porch essentially is two stories and the new porch will be one story and pulled back three feet to help reduce the impact to the neighbor. Williams stated with the changes they will be reducing the massing and that the sketch shows the existing home and then the new home. Thiesse asked if they can pull it back to the 75 -foot setback, which would be taking it back ten feet. Williams stated they have a concern with the existing topography, which is the main reason for the proposed location. Thiesse stated from the survey it appears that the existing garage is at about the center line of the cul-de- sac to the north and that the new house is back further than that. As a result, there will be quite a bit more room to maneuver. Williams stated given the number of issues they have encountered, they feel this is a good solution. Leskinen noted in order to meet the average lakeshore setback, they would only need to move it back about a foot. Leskinen asked if there is a reason why that setback cannot be met. Williams stated they felt their request was reasonable but that he will discuss it with his clients prior to the City Council meeting. Page 14 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented they would have more usable backyard if the house is moved further back and would be in conformity with the 75 -foot line. Williams stated they would be happy to consider that and that in his view it would be a pretty minor adjustment. Williams stated he believes the property owners would be agreeable to that. Mary Enger, property owner, stated the house originally belonged to her parents and that they are attempting to maintain the essence of the home for sentimental reasons. Enger stated they attempted to meet the side yard setbacks and that they are only looking to add some features that would make it safer and allow them to have visitors easier. Enger indicated she has a large family and they spend a lot of time in the front porch, which is why they would like to keep it close to the house. Landgraver asked if Mr. Williams has any response to the City Engineer's comments. Williams stated they are aware of it and that they understand the issues. Williams stated they understand they will need to meet the engineer's requests, but they will have to sit down with everyone to resolve that. Landgraver suggested that be resolved prior to proceeding to the City Council. Williams asked if they could make the permits subject to that being resolved in the event the neighbors are not around. Thiesse stated the City Council will need to be made aware of that. Thiesse noted the neighbor has expressed a concern about the drainage. Williams stated when the landscape architect becomes involved, they will discuss that and create a drainage plan. Williams noted the basin area turns into a skating rink on this property and that the neighbor is attempting to sell his lot. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. Schoenzeit stated in his view the Planning Commission should make the recommendation that the house be relocated behind the average lakeshore setback line. Page 15 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver indicated he is in agreement. Lemke stated he has issues with the 75 -foot setback, especially since this is a clean sheet design. Thiesse noted the applicants are making improvements overall to the situation. Landgraver stated he sees the driveway as a practical difficulty. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission does not have a good contour of where the bowl starts. Thiesse stated the existing garage is very close to the contours of the new home. Thiesse stated by forcing a person to build their house ten feet back, they may lose their lake sightline because they are being forced back, which is a practical difficulty. Leskinen stated she can accept the encroachment within the 75 -foot zone but not within the average lakeshore setback. Leskinen stated she can appreciate the sentiment of wanting it similar to what it was before, but that she can find no practical difficulty for the encroachment, particularly since the lot next door is vacant, which is more reason to pull it back a foot and a half. Oakden noted if the proposed house is moved to the 66 -foot mark to where the existing house is, the line would be drawn there, and they would be subject to the average lakeshore setback or the 75 -foot line, whichever is more restrictive. Schoenzeit stated if they split the difference, it would be 69 feet. Thiesse stated at the end of the day, it is likely the properties will be at 66 feet. Leskinen commented they could also build in-kind. Thiesse stated they are improving the situation. Lemke stated he still has a concern with the encroachment into the 75 -foot zone. Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000019, Mark Williams, 2697 Casco Point Road, granting of a 0-75 foot lake setback variance, hardcover variance, lot area and lot width variances, subject to the conditions of the City Engineer, and to recommend denial of the average lakeshore setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Lemke opposed. Page 16 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 7. LA18-000020 KUHL DESIGN, 2280 FOX STREET, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:58 P.M. — 8:04 P.M. Dan Murphy, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a pool building with the installation of a full bathroom, including shower. The building will be used seasonally and is a permitted use. The bathroom facilities require a conditional use permit. A conditional use analysis was provided in the staff report. Staff did receive a phone call from a neighbor who had some questions about the proposal, but no formal concerns have been submitted. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit conditioned upon septic system compliance and the property owner's agreement to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the City or if allowed by this Code; used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained; or if rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Dan Murphy, Kuhl Design Build, stated he knows one of the concerns for a conditional use permit is that the structure will be used as a dwelling. Murphy noted none of the walls are insulated and that there will be a sliding screen that goes up and down on the posts. In addition, there is no heat supply to the structure and as a result it can only be used during the summer. Murphy stated the structure will be strictly for pool use only. Murphy noted they are on track for septic approval and that the property owners have already paid for the septic and the money is in escrow with the City. Murphy indicated they are fine with the covenant. Murphy stated the neighbors down the road were talking about doing some pine tree landscaping along the roadway to make it more private and that he talked to the homeowner about it today. Schoenzeit asked how they can drain a chlorine pool with a septic system. Murphy indicated the pool is not drained and that it will be covered in the winter. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Page 17 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Thiesse stated it appears the applicants are addressing the septic and that all the other issues are resolved. Leskinen moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000020, Kuhl Design, 2280 Fox Street, granting of a conditional use permit. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 8:04 p.m. to 8:07 p.m.) 8. LAI 8-000023 CITY OF ORONO, AMEND ARTICLE XI OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO WETLANDS AND WETLAND SETBACKS, 8:04 P.M. — 8:19 P.M. Barnhart stated this application deals with a review of wetland setback requirements. Last year the Council elected to change the wetland delineation requirements but did not elect to change the wetland setbacks. Last fall the City Council directed Staff to review an ordinance that would consider adjusting the setbacks. Barnhart indicated the first time the setbacks were reviewed by the City Council there was some confusion between setbacks and buffers. Setbacks are established by the City and prevent construction within a certain area, such as a front yard setback or side setback. The Watershed District establishes a buffer in certain circumstances, usually at the time of platting or at the time a new house is being constructed, and at that time they will usually require wetland delineations and buffers. In addition to certain setbacks, no grading, fertilizers or structures are allowed within the buffer. As it relates to this proposed change, the amendment only addresses setback. Based on Council direction, Staff put together a draft ordinance with the goal of making it easier to understand. Some sections of the current code were removed that Staff did not feel apply. In addition, Staff attempted to try to simplify what the requirement is in terms of separation of a structure from the wetland delineation. Staff is proposing that if the Watershed District requires a buffer, that that be the separation between the improvement and the wetland. Orono currently has that buffer as well as an additional 10 -foot setback, which Staff is proposing be removed under this text amendment. Barnhart stated when a buffer is not required, which applies primarily to decks and accessory structures that do not trigger Watershed rules, the City has a current setback of 35 feet. That setback comes from a Page 18 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 10 -foot separation as well as the 25 -foot setback. Staff is now proposing a 25 -foot setback, which removes that extra level of setback that many cities do not require, Staff also proposes removing the table that talks about the type of protection classification for the wetland, the description, and the additional protection. Since that is regulated by the Watershed District, Staff felt it was redundant. Barnhart stated at this time Staff is looking for a recommendation from the Planning Commission to take to the City Council. Schoenzeit stated the extra 10 feet was added to help in situations where there was a door leading out to the back yard and there was a buffer. Schoenzeit stated the extra 10 feet was designed to give the homeowner some extra room and this seems to take that away. Schoenzeit suggested Staff consider adjusting it for a door going out to that area. Schoenzeit stated if the door is on the side of the house and not next to the buffer area, they might not need that extra room. Thiesse noted it was the City's request previously to add that extra 10 feet. Schoenzeit stated that extra 10 feet provides additional protection to the wetland buffer. Thiesse stated they could also state that no door is allowed into that area. Barnhart stated the Watershed District's sole purpose is to protect the wetland, and it was the thinking that if the Watershed District does not require an additional setback to the buffer, why should the City. Thiesse stated the minute something is allowed right next to that buffer, activity is going to start to occur within the buffer because there is a need to maintain someone's property. Landgraver noted in the past the Planning Commission has recommended the additional protection be added. Schoenzeit stated it is similar to the 75 -foot zone rather than a 50 -foot setback. Thiesse stated his concern is if the 10 feet is removed, all that accomplishes is that the structure is moved up to that buffer and the City now has something they cannot enforce. Barnhart stated the homeowner can walk in that area but they cannot mow or add fertilizer. Barnhart stated to some degree it is not the City's rule to enforce and it falls to the Watershed District. Page 19 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented if it is not broken, there is no need to fix it. Thiesse asked if the City has received a number of requests to go within the 10 feet. Barnhart stated it is his understanding that there are a number of residents who have spoken to elected officials about the extra setback but that he does not have any hard data about that. Landgraver commented the City needs to balance what Orono has stood for in the past and the requests from a couple of residents. Landgraver stated he believes the 10 -foot setback was a reasonable enhancement and that he has not been convinced that anything has changed. Leskinen concurred that if it is not broke, it doesn't need fixing. Leskinen stated the City has the variance process if there is a need to encroach into the 10 -foot setback, and that if it is just a handful of people, she would be reluctant to change what is in place currently. Schoenzeit stated it might be compelling on a small lot but that can be looked at through the variance process. Thiesse noted it was determined it was a problem previously, which is why it was established. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Lemke stated it should be looked at on a case-by-case basis. Lemke moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend denial of Application No. LA18-000023, City of Orono, Amend Article XI of the City Code Related to Wetlands and Wetland Setbacks. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 9. LA18-000024 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 78-1 AND 82-2 RELATED TO ZONING AND SUBDIVISION DEFINITIONS, INCLUDING IN-KIND, DRY BUILDABLE, AND OTHERS, 8:19 P.M. — 8:27 P.M. Barnhart noted Staff is not asking for a recommendation at this point and that the Planning Commission will be reviewing this again more thoroughly in a month. Staff is currently in the early stages of Page 20 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. clarifying some definitions to help clarify issues, and from a usability standpoint, Staff has identified seven or eight definitions that are used daily but may not be thoroughly defined. Barnhart stated Staff is looking at family and dwelling definitions due to the new rental house ordinance. In addition, the City currently has a defined unit for animal but Staff is seeing more requests for how many goats or chickens are allowed, which is not defined in the ordinance and should be clarified. Also included in the City's definitions is building height, which includes the location of the top most window. Building height is also used to determine massing. Barnhart stated it comes down to the question of what impact the highest window has on massing, and so Staff is proposing to cut that last sentence. Barnhart stated the change might have a marginal impact on height but the overall height limit will remain at 30 feet. Also being reviewed are the definitions for cornice and dry buildable. Dry buildable is important when considering plats and subdivisions and is part of the process in RPUD calculations. Barnhart indicated that should be included in the code. Landgraver asked why it is not just considered buildable. Curtis stated buildable area is used sometimes in setbacks. Barnhart stated dry buildable is a term that has historically been used and that he would prefer to leave it as is. Schoenzeit stated if someone has a 20 -acre lot that is mostly wetland, the term dry buildable helps set the expectation that that portion of the property is not counted as buildable. Lemke asked if the buffer should be included in there as part of the equation. Barnhart indicated the wetland buffer, steep slopes, and bluffs currently are not included in the buildable area. Thiesse asked if setbacks are included. Barnhart indicated they are. Barnhart stated as it relates to dwelling, the code contains independent living, sleeping, housekeeping accommodations, and sanitary facilities for occupancy by one family. Barnhart stated this is important when talking about guest houses, guest apartments, and pool houses, and if any of those improvements predate that requirement, Staff would like to clarify what a dwelling is. A Page 21 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Another definition Staff is looking at is family. The historic family is married or related but that is not necessary the case currently. Landgraver noted it says blood and family, and recommended the word "or" be used rather than "and". Barnhart stated as it relates to in-kind, that is used in the context of replacement or nonconforming structures. The homeowner is allowed to replace what is existing and Staff tries to use the terms location, height and depth to help define what can be rebuilt. Barnhart noted the Planning Commission will see this item next week at the work session and then again as an ordinance amendment in April. Barnhart requested the Planning Commission send him any comments or suggestions they might have. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. 10. UPDATE ON FEBRUARY 12, 2018, CITY COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart reported the majority of the items on the February 12 agenda were placed on the Consent Agenda and the meeting was relatively short. 11. PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON FOR APRIL 9, 2018, CITY COUNCIL MEETING: CHAD OLSON 12. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Lemke asked about the Planning Commission replacements. Barnhart indicated interviews are being conducted on Tuesday by the City Council and that the new commissioners will be sworn in prior to the April Planning Commission meeting. 1I W W. `I►11►[11�K1 u7 lu if.XYC17�[K�� ► " None ADJOURNMENT Page 22 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver moved, Schwingler seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:31 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. ATTEST: John Thiesse, Chair Page 23 of 23 Item 3 Date Application Received: December 13, 2017 Date Application Considered as Complete: January 4, 2018 60 -Day Review Period Expires: March 5, 2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Reif, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: April 16, 2018 Subject: LA18-000033 (18-4000), Jeff Martineau o/b/o Barbara Garcia, 1335 Arbor Street, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting multiple variances for lot area, lot width, front setback, side street setback and interior side setback Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. Background The application had previously requested the same setback variances and a structural coverage variance. The Planning Commission on January 16, 2018 denied the request due to the structural coverage variance. The City Council on February 12, 2018 tabled the application and asked the applicants to redesign the home to meeting the structural coverage standards and bring the application back through the public hearing process. It is appropriate to have the Planning Commission review the redesigned building, and allow further public comment. The applicant proposes to construct a new home located at 1335 Arbor Street, replacing an existing home on the property. The proposed home will be more centered on the lot. The site is a corner and through lot with streets on three of the four sides. The applicant proposes to build a full basement rambler style home with two stall garage and a deck. They are located in the RR -113 2 acre zoning district and the lot is extremely small at 0.20 acres in a zone requiring 2 acres. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420 - Setbacks: DISTRICT RR -1B Required Existing Proposed Front (Arbor St) 50' 15.4 40' Rear (Briar St)_ 50' 97.5 53' Street (Prospect Ave) 30' 15.5 8.5' Side 10' 7.7 7.5' Section 420- Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT RR -113 Lot Area Lot Width 18-4000 April 16, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 1200' Actual 9,100 s. (0.2 acre) 52' Section 78-1403- Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 9100 s. (0.2 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. Proposed Proposed: 1,996 s.f. (House and Entry) Zone (21.9%) *On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 3 9,100 s.f. 3,185 s.f. 2,112 s.f. 3,119s.f. (35 %) (23.21%) (34.27%) Applicable Regulations: Setback Variances (Section 78-4201 The applicant is proposed to construct a new home that is oriented towards Arbor. They are requesting a 40' front yard (Arbor Street) setback where a 50' is required. They are requesting a 7.5 interior side yard setback where a 10' feet is required. They are requesting a 8.5 side (Prospect Ave.) street setback where 30' is required. The front and interior side yard setbacks seem reasonable for the small lot location. The proposed site plan is showing window wells which encroach closer to the setbacks then the principle building. Per the City Code 1405 Nonencroachments, window wells are permitted to encroach into the setback but not to extend more than 5 feet from the building The building plans also show a small bump out in the south west corner of the home parallel to the interior side lot line for a chimney. This bump out is not shown on the survey. It should be clarified if this is included as part of the footprint of the home before a final decision be council is made. Lot Area and Width Variance (Section 78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. Not Met. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 35 percent of the entire lot area. 18-4000 April 16, 2018 Page 3 of 5 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. Not Met. The applicant's need for a multiple setback variances results in the property's inability to conform to #1 and #4 above. Therefore, a lot width and area variance is also required in order to develop the property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The variances for a 40' front, 7.5' interior side and 8.5 street side request is reasonable considering the configuration and buildable area of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing use of the property in a reasonable manner with the construction on a single family home. There is limited space to construct a conforming structure on the site. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and shape, and its uniqueness being a lot abutting 3 streets. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the surrounding homes. d. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 18-4000 April 16, 2018 Page 4 of 5 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the RR -113 District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The size of the lot with in the RR -113 zoning district and abuting 3 streets is unique for the requested lot width, lot area and setback variances variances. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The size of the lot and its locations as it pertains to the existing zoning district is peculiar to the property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this statement to be true to allow for construction of a single family home on this parcel. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application has stated the narrow corner lot has setback challenges for construction of a single family home. The property is unique in size location between three streets. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Engineer Comments A proposed grading plan will be submitted and reviewed with the building permit. Depending on roof line, roof overhang or small areas for drainage water may be able to be mitigated with a gutter system. The applicant should show how they plan to address drainage on the site with a submitted grading plan. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. 18-4000 April 16, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, lot width and proposed setbacks. Due to the size of the lot located within the 2 acre RR -16 zoning district. The lot is also unique in that has street which is abutting 3 sides of the lot. Public Comments Public comments made at the January 16, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting were in favor of the proposed project. A major concern that came up from the neighborhood was the proposed height of the building and for it to remain a one story home as to not overshadow the street to have the home maintain the character of the neighborhood. This was a discussion by the council as well. The new redesigned home is a one story home with no windows above the first floor. Issues for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission should discuss the side street setback and the visual impact that may have. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Planning Commission options for consideration If the Planning Commission has discussed and has sufficient findings for the requests, staff would recommend approval of the request variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Site Pictures Exhibit F. Setback Exhibit Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map City of Orono Variance Application StreetAddress: 2750 Kelley Parkway Application # Orono, MN 55356 Date Received: R Main: 952-249-4600 Staff ; fax 952-249-4616 Mailing Address. Fee: $275 P.O. Box 66 Escrow: Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION:t-- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (attach necessary) APPLICANT INFORM ff N: Wt check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: -11 Phone (Primary): cZ Mailing Address: 2-0 I _ STQ C. ZIP: Email: � � � � � - � - Tio PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 13 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Mame: raQ �� pre I IQ Phone (Primary): Mailing Address:I On , C' ZIP. Email: hl�b APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and praperty owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknawtedge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council_ If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend In place of the applicantiowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project • Information will be distributed -a ail. Applicant Signature: 4N)— Date: 1 Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Variance Apprica5on – September 2017 Page 4 Date: 1 Z 13 REQ , Date: 0 0 Ci -Y OF ORONO °moo City of Orono z Variance Pre -Application °0 Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre -application meeting_) -ydrt ce lise onI it - �r�c�-�atrrie. FCUatet_- What is the purpose of a pre -application meeting? Pre -application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: Property Identification Numbe Zoning District: Size of Property: S 2 X 1 `( C_ _ DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: ❑ Average Setback >tide Yard Setback Cl Rear Yard Setback ❑ Hardcover LI Lot Coverage ❑ Lot Area ® Other: ❑ Lake/Front Yard Setback ❑ Lot Width AppiicanVs Initials: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form, understands it as it has been explained to them, and is Property aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance Owner's application. Initials: Applicant's Initials: BILLS AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, Property Owner's as well as provide an escrow in the amount of $ to guarantee payment of the Q above. Initials: *Please note: Your v, form will be completed Applicant Signature: (_ Owner Signature: fJ Vadance Applicafion — September 2017 ccepted without a pre -application meeting during which this Date: .� . Date: l 2 1 1-7 RECEIVED A1993 ., � DEC 13ZUio CITY OF ORONO PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The propert=)� r proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." 2. "The pligh,pf the landowner is due to circumstances unique to hi ,property not created b the landowner." / Ka 5 it2 e --7 i " _� y-/ A. ±57-2- Lo 3. "The vasa ce, if gragted, will not alter the esTtial character of the lob t ." 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, h n 'n harmony with this Chapter." 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for_pr rty in the zone where the affected person's land is located." RECEIVED Variance Application — September 2017 0 ID6C I ,fit � u I i Page 7 =0 CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council mpermit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 1, I 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or landi question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property..// by�,7Zr.%� --t—, //i i� 9. "The conditions do not a ly to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjo ment of a substantial property right of the applicant." l 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to tD9 intent of the Zoning Code .,"�'/ 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is' necessary to alleviate demonstrable diffi ulty." P,Gge e% Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Ntellln -7 _/ x,e <;I (,.' / /4 L) Variance Application — September 2017 Page 8 .140 0 0 DEC i3euir CITY OF ORONO v O /W CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR OF CO 11, BLOCK Z,-MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUN-1Y, MINNESOTA Mut OF tsMum i UP SHED 10.0 (E) n III PROSPECT AVE. POOL 1/ _ v STwP \ / I RRESRHUED 62.1 / ECEv = (y5g.v) u, EXISTING N RUU5E #1335 62.1 S 89020'30" It 175.00 EXISTING RDUSE x#1355 O 0 Siwr �� (F) ,.. � O U (A) -" 0 GARAGE FLOOR�-- ECEv = (95t.t) BEACKTOP o ------------------ DRIVEWAY Z 15.4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PRERIBES: LOT 1, SIOCK Z, ITARKVICCt • : uwfi ote� iron marker Lound p : Denotes iron marker set -- 56— Denotes ex6iing curimor ii"u, iTiooan 3ca level dato, I his Soy vey zonows the boos dal ies of the above described property andthe locaiion Man exisun9 nvu=, Qiivevvay, angio aria ooA6u� iy hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or itripruvcmu its. / o / (/J r O 0 r Q!� O Z /m CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR OF CO 11, BLOCK Z,-MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUN-1Y, MINNESOTA Mut OF tsMum i UP SHED 10.0 (E) n III PROSPECT AVE. POOL 1/ _ v STwP \ / I RRESRHUED 62.1 / ECEv = (y5g.v) u, EXISTING N RUU5E #1335 62.1 S 89020'30" It 175.00 EXISTING RDUSE x#1355 O 0 Siwr �� (F) ,.. � O U (A) -" 0 GARAGE FLOOR�-- ECEv = (95t.t) BEACKTOP o ------------------ DRIVEWAY Z 15.4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PRERIBES: LOT 1, SIOCK Z, ITARKVICCt • : uwfi ote� iron marker Lound p : Denotes iron marker set -- 56— Denotes ex6iing curimor ii"u, iTiooan 3ca level dato, I his Soy vey zonows the boos dal ies of the above described property andthe locaiion Man exisun9 nvu=, Qiivevvay, angio aria ooA6u� iy hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or itripruvcmu its. 00 I 0 00 18-087 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR COLIN FELLER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EDGE OF BLACKTOP O / O N / 9 LLI O U) o O / T 0 Z----------- m FENCELINE ' PROSPECT AVE. ---------- ;� :Cp : 00 i J 35.0�� \\ (H) 3 — �0 \ p N / n WALK -t-Q)----------------- �- Z / ENTRY C) 3 13.0 9.0 �? "� 15.5 PROPOSED PATIO (B)�� DOUSE # 13.35 (A) I w IQ o � 18.0 28.5 �i C3 WINDOW WELL i IPOOL tii 22.0 ol BLACKTOP; N DRIVEWAY: (E) \ uu)i 40.00 U 0 O 0 S 89020'30" E 175.00 EXISTING I HOUSE I #1355 I I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 1, Block 2, MARKVILLE 3-21-18:REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE SCALE • Denotes iron marker found 1 if — 20' O : Denotes iron marker set DATE — _956– –_; Denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum 12-6-17 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property and the location of an existing house, driveway, shed and existing JOB NO- hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments 1 R—(1R7 or improvements. r- 00 0 1 00 -J �i PROSPECT AVE. ---------- ;� :Cp : 00 i J 35.0�� \\ (H) 3 — �0 \ p N / n WALK -t-Q)----------------- �- Z / ENTRY C) 3 13.0 9.0 �? "� 15.5 PROPOSED PATIO (B)�� DOUSE # 13.35 (A) I w IQ o � 18.0 28.5 �i C3 WINDOW WELL i IPOOL tii 22.0 ol BLACKTOP; N DRIVEWAY: (E) \ uu)i 40.00 U 0 O 0 S 89020'30" E 175.00 EXISTING I HOUSE I #1355 I I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 1, Block 2, MARKVILLE 3-21-18:REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE SCALE • Denotes iron marker found 1 if — 20' O : Denotes iron marker set DATE — _956– –_; Denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum 12-6-17 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property and the location of an existing house, driveway, shed and existing JOB NO- hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments 1 R—(1R7 or improvements. r- 00 0 1 00 v v CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR OF LO 1 1, BLOCK 2, MAR-K/I LLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROSPECT AVE. i N EDGE OF SMu ii uP ---S-89!-20"300-E- _.S-89!-29`30"-E-1-------------- :00 CC) \ DECK 75 :v � � �-. Vo 12PRUPUSEU o V, WALK - .- -- N1.0 - i HubbE co o / o ?F1 ss5 9.25 CJ)v / (A) o BLACKTOP 0 Of i 0- / N o DRIVEWAY CV (t) V m Z - 70.00 it // O: /_ FENctuNE __....__-.. �?: \ 40.00 Q S 89020'30° It 115.00 EXISTING POOL HOUSE T#1355 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISE: Cot -i, aiocK /-, MARK711M • Denutc5 irt;n iafRer Lound _ I hereby certify that this plan; specification, or report 5(;A -LE O :Denotes iron marker set ��%• was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 1" = 20' RS, and that I am a duly EicenSed Eand Surveyor under vA r E -- 956 -- Denotes existing contour line_ mean sea iuvv aurum the laws UT the State UT MirineSuta. 12-6-17 I fiia aui vcy aFt-uws the Bum iBarlCs Ot the a60ve tlesCi iced Ni upwrty and the location UT an umzltiritj Mnuao, driveway_ aR2O and er atiny JOB NO. hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments Ur improvements. I � ort!ont Mfakl. rtooKl�G�rss�v RodFh � ^�- ------ f � � t � lavpecaevenrxhc.:c._sgrcv�wctu2cDS�ei:ia.�pi�..�� EB .0ia I ----- {''IZO-S�IPL"�iT_._` i�F�f-�_N'Ct'�'-'•'EG�VA'T9'SKI-----�---....-_..__..,_-..__...___.�.—..—. i I I NYZDx_ .._----- IL ' I ....... T._ ls3'1'�IZT6�C _--f!, 4tAjKAWj 14AM90 PA ..... X s-484 MAV," ]-�-AaA4E 1 -y -ft = Ab4 i. iq,&Aif fST­ FLOOR Pty ... ................ .. ... ............. 1. .- I ... Lex , (or so, R -DT- 77�-- -42. tktX4 4z cyT 77�-- City of Orono a Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: r{k Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 ier Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:ARDCOV_ In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey(Square Total Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 3V 720 S.F. A `� 04e � / 9 e'- S.F. B Z70 S.F. C -rZ'Y 28 S.F. D &4Lx 13V S.F. E raze. 7 _ S.F. F G € W4 L S.F. G Al r! do 7 S.F. H /1 S.F. _ I S.F. S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W _ _ S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. 2 S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 777, .; S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. '(21 Total Excludable Hardcover O S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line Q H S.F. 4 Total Lot Area Y1 D O S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) +(4)) 3V. 27% Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with,provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 04125/2011 1295 OP I110 RROSPE 5 TAW! IN1EAt - V PRQ PE6 r.• Ar AYE ,a 1 0 P•ROSPEE AYE " oma J 4 W al �\k �� sidet�zad , w I : � fide. hard 10 `min o CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BARBARA GARC IA OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MARKVI LLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROSPECT AVE. Gnrgz nF GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952.473-4141 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Numbfr 12755 1.— N LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 1, Block 2, MARKALLE SCALE • Denotes iron marker found 1" = 20' O : Denotes iron marker set DATE ---956---; Denotes existing Contour line, mean sea level datum 12-6-17 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property and the location of an existing house, driveway, shed and existing JOB NOhardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments 17-437 or improvements. City of Orono �No Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: `'kswo*E` Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 ier Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:ARDCOV_ In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey(Square Total Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 3V 720 S.F. A `� 04e � / 9 e'- S.F. B Z70 S.F. C -rZ'Y 28 S.F. D &4Lx 13V S.F. E raze. 7 _ S.F. F G € W4 L S.F. G Al r! do 7 S.F. H /1 S.F. _ I S.F. S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W _ _ S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. 2 S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 777, .; S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. '(21 Total Excludable Hardcover O S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line Q H S.F. 4 Total Lot Area Y1 D O S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) +(4)) 3V. 27% Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with,provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 12/13/2017 0 12,33 2v7r (93) 251 1295 (4n 2180 (t9) it? 1212 ` 1215 1224 1223 (74, (71) (IvS; 1241 1250 1261 (39) (32) 12'10 (38) 1271 (33) 1290 (3/. 4 2(35) 160 1012 (45) Crystal Ave 1245 1 yC:5 (69) 1223 1230 (65) 1240 1241 i (99) 0 12L #a�. 1250 I+osl (22), 1 (23) { E. 1270 (29) 127. (2d) t (25) 1' E`f (15t 2150 2140 Crystal Bay 2170 (16) (103) 38 (17) PAround 2160 fires ertAve 2ti15 35 1955 (52) 1335 (161) b til 1365 1375 O r', 20"1 �) ( (55) - (49) (48) a: w ) 380 i6.1 Q 1380 CQ 2180% (5) 1330 2060 1385 !' 2080 (4) G 1 ,17) Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: i I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any RECEIVED kind; and (iii) is no uifor legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin Coountynty shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. DEC 1 20 For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us CIN OF ORONO, RUN DATE: 12/13/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 10-117-23 110002 38 10-117-23 310036 38 10-117-23 310055 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH M & J BLUE GERALD F SEILER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 1385 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY MARCUS J & JUDY A BLUE GERALD F SEILER REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 2562 WESTERN AVE N 7014TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 ORONO MN 55391 C J & J L ALBRECHT 38 10-117-23 23 0004 38 10-117-23 310043 38 10-117-23 310056 C DAHL & D L HOPP ET AL PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1291 BRIAR ST 2140 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTOPHER DAHL PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY DEBORAH L HOPP 1291 BRIAR ST 2885 SANFORD AVE SW 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR WAYZATA MN 55391 #34389 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 GRANDVILLE MI 49418 38 10-117-23 310016 38 10-117-23 310044 38 10-117-23 310057 KYLA R HUDSON TRUST J A GERBER & P C REITAN KAREN BARTELT 2150 PROSPECT AVE 1295 BRLAR ST 1335 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KYLA & CASEY HUDSON JOEL A GERBER KAREN BARTELT 2150 PROSPECT AVE P.O. BOX 74 1335 BRLAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310017 38 10-117-23 310048 M MADDIE & M MADDIE CRAIG B SARNER 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1375 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL & MELISSA MADDIE CRAIG B SARNER 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1375 BROWN RD S CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310018 38 10-117-23 310049 JANE WHITE CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 2170 PROSPECT AVE 1380 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 JANE & TIM WHITE CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 16820 CO RD 122 1380 ARBOR ST MAYER MN 55360 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310019 38 10-117-23 310050 D& K BECKER P F& L KALEY 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1395 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 DONALD & KATHERINE J BECKER PHILIP KALEY 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1395 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310027 38 10-117-23 310051 VIL OF ORONO BARBARA J GARCIA 1285 BROWN RD S 1335 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO BARBARA J GARCIA PO BOX 66 P O BOX 114 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310028 38 10-117-23 310052 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ET AL R F CRAIG & S F CRAIG 1290 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ROBERT F CRAIG SHERRI STRELOW-LUNDBLAD SAMANTHA F CRAIG 1290 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310034 38 10-117-23 310053 C J ALBRECHT & J L ALBRECHT J ZITZLOFF & B ZITZLOFF 1285 ARBOR ST 1380 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 C J & J L ALBRECHT JEFFREY ZITZLOFF 1285 ARBOR ST BRENDA ZITZLOFF WAYZATA MN 55391 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310035 38 10-117-23 310054 TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1295 ARBOR ST 1365 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND CHRISTOPHER R PERRY 1365 ARBOR ST 1125 HUNTER DR PO BOX 161 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310058 AARON H PRINTUP 2195 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55323 AARON H PRINTUP 2195 PROSPECT AVE P O BOX 104 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310097 VILLAGE OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 VILLAGE OF ORONO POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310098 MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 310101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310103 EMILY K FISCHER 2140 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55323 EMILY K FISCHER 2140 PROSPECT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 32 0019 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2240 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 RECEIVED DEC 13 2017 CITY OF ORONO kV RY* 8460*" l CaSy reel- HQure55 Lduel®i 1.7o to avery.com/ templates l Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge l Use Avery Template 8460 38 10-117-23 110002 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 10-117-23 23 0004 CHRISTOPHER DAHL DEBORAH L HOPP 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310016 KYLA & CASEY HUDSON 2150 PROSPECT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310017 MICHAEL & MELISSA MADDIE 2160 PROSPECT AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310018 JANE & TIM WHITE 16820 CO RD 122 MAYER MN 55360 38 10-117-23 310019 DONALD & KATHERINE J BECKER 2180 PROSPECT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310027 CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310028 DEAN T LUNDBLAD SHERRI STRELOW-LUNDBLAD 1290 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310034 C J & J L ALBRECHT 1285 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310035 TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC CHRISTOPHER R PERRY 1125 HUNTER DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310036 38 10-117-23 310055 MARCUS J & JUDY A BLUE GERALD F SEILER 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 2562 WESTERN AVE N WAYZATA MN 55391 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-117-23 310043 38 10-117-23 310056 PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY 1291 BRIAR ST 2885 SANFORD AVE SW WAYZATA MN 55391 #34389 WAYZATA MN 55391 GRANDVILLE MI 49418 38 10-117-23 310044 38 10-117-23 310057 JOEL A GERBER KAREN BARTELT P.O. BOX 74 1335 BRIAR ST CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310048 38 10-117-23 310058 CRAIG B SARNER AARON H PRINTUP 1375 BROWN RD S 2195 PROSPECT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 P O BOX 104 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310049 38 10-117-23 310097 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER VILLAGE OF ORONO 1380 ARBOR ST P O BOX 66 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310050 38 10-117-23 310098 PHILIP KALEY MSSP ORONO LLC 1395 BROWN RD S ATTN RAJIV GARG WAYZATA MN 55391 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 310051 38 10-117-23 310101 BARBARA J GARCIA CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 114 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 310052 38 10-117-23 310103 ROBERT F CRAIG EMILY K FISCHER SAMANTHA F CRAIG 2140 PROSPECT AVE 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310053 38 10-117-23 32 0019 JEFFREY ZITZLOFF MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS BRENDA ZITZLOFF 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310054 6 ECEIV DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND D, 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 DEC 13 7.0 1 7 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 # 4 0 0 0 Cri-Y OF ORONO Pat: averycom/patents ; Etiquettes d'adresse Easy Peel® 1 Allez a avery.ca/gabarits 1 RPnfiP7 a IA hachaIrP afin rip revPlPr lP rphard Pnn-un® i i irir— is A.,o.,, RAAn Item 4 Date Application Received: 02/13/18 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/09/18 60 - Day Review Period Expires: 06/08/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 16 April 2018 Subject: #LA18-000012, Mark Stipakov, 2150 Sixth Avenue N / Outlot A Phillips Woodland Terrace 3rd Amend Conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 4202 Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the original conditions of subdivision approval regarding the driveway. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Application Summary The applicant, Mr. Stipakov, has described his request and proposed use for the property in a letter dated June 12, 2017 (attached as Exhibit B). The request is to allow a 'hammerhead' type turnaround, in lieu of the typical required cul-de-sac. The turnaround will require the creation of an easement. The impetus for the request is the applicant's desire to develop the vacant property. Background Phillips Woodland Terrace 3rd Addition ("PWT 3rd") received final plat approval in 1999. This subdivision created 2 lots and one outlot from then Lot 1 Block 1 Phillips Woodland Terrace 2nd Addition. Adding the third lot, the Council required the platting of a 50 foot wide road, but did not require a cul-de-sac as was the standard at the time, and is so currently. Council discussion at the time included a review of the cul-de-sac requirements. No review has been completed. The City also did not require an upgrade of the private driveway to a width and profile of a private road at that time. These improvements, "to city standards" was deferred until the subject lot was developed. PWT 3rd preliminary plat Resolution No. 4202 states the following: 1. The applicant shall execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway in Outlot A, and to define future financial obligation of the owners of 2140 and 2160 Sixth Avenue North at such time the driveway is upgraded to City standards to serve a third residence on Lot 2 (i.e. 2150 Sixth). [Page 3 ¶4] 2. No building permit will be issued for Lot 2 until the construction of driveway and drainage improvements is complete. [Page 3 ¶71 The minutes and Resolution from this meeting are attached. Although the discussion regarding the cul-de-sac is somewhat reflected in the minutes, the translation to the resolution language is FILE #LA18-000012 16 April 1028 Page 2 of 3 not specific enough to result in clear direction today. Staff believes the Council intended to not require a road upgrade, however the reference to "upgraded to City standards" in the resolution (#2 above) appears to contradict that interpretation. Regardless of intent, the wording of the resolution governs, unless waived or amended by the City Council. The owner of 2150 Sixth Avenue North plans to develop the property with a residence. He met with staff a number of times regarding the deferred requirements which appear to trigger paving a 24 foot wide private road with a cul-de-sac (as is today's road standards for three or more lots served). Limited by the constraints of the 50 foot wide platted outlot, and dry buildable area on his own property, he is seeking a solution which meets the needs of the City and emergency service vehicles, and yet both maintains the character of the small "neighborhood" and does not create a financial or property hardship (land reduction). In order to seek an alternative solution, he requested a driveway permit from Hennepin County to access Sixth Avenue North (CSAH 6) directly; this permit was denied (Exhibit G). The applicant has provided a plan which creates a private road, increasing the width of the existing driveway from ±12 feet to 24 feet until it branches off to the northeast (±125 feet from County Road 6) where a 20 foot wide hammerhead is shown to provide backup opportunity into the applicant's property. This configuration appears to meet the dimensional requirement for a turnaround. Beyond the 24 foot width private road the two homes at 2140 and 2150 will be served by a private driveway. The hammerhead will be accomplished by the creation of an easement over the applicant's property dedicated to the public, benefitting the public and the adjacent property owners. Engineer Comments The City Engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the request, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the road improvement plan, including easement creation, as proposed on the survey by Gronberg dated 04/09/18 (Exhibit C). Staff further recommends approval of the requested amendments to the subdivision resolution (Resol. No. 4202). A separate private road easement should be drafted to address the hammerhead area. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary (via citizenserve) Exhibit B. Applicant's Request Narrative Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Road Plan Exhibit D. Half Section Map Excerpt (original lot) Exhibit E. Aerial Photos Exhibit F. City Engineer Comments FILE #LA18-000012 16 April 1028 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit G. Hennepin County ROW Permit Denial Exhibit H. 2015 MN Fire Code Appendix D Exhibit 1. PWT 3rd Prel Plat Resolution No. 4202 Exhibit J. City Council Minutes 1998/1999 Re: PWT 3rd Exhibit K. PWT 3rd Final Plat Resolution No. 4369 Exhibit L. Road Easement: Outlot A, PWT 3" Exhibit M. Road Declaration: Outlot A, PWT 3rd Exhibit N. Property Owners List Exhibit O. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 02/13/2018 Address: 2150 SIXTH AVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 2711823310027 Land Use Number: LA18-000012 Application Submitted By: Owner: Name: Mark & Izabella Stipakov Address: 2020 Salem Ct ORONO, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Mark Stipakov Address: 2020 Salem Ct Orono, MN 55356 Project Description: Subdivision to create an easement to accommodate the cul-de-sac/turnaround Land Use Application Type: Subdivision Application M Applicant Signature: June 12`h,2017 To:Melanie CurtisCity Planner,City of Orono Hello Melanie, We are purchasing a lot at 2150 County Road 6 legally described as lot 2 block 1,13hilips Woodland Terrace Third Addition.Our plan is to built a rambler with 4 bedrooms which will house people with autism including our 21 year daughter Shana. We are residents of Orono since 1994 and love the area. Of course proximity of our residence(We live on Salem Ct) is playing big difference in us buying this lot. We found out that, city wants all Outlot A to be constructed by the owner of the lot to be a private road since there will be more than two properties accessed from existing driveway. I received a proposal from the JBT Company indicating that the cost of such construction will be around $60,000(including cutting many trees). This will make our project very difficult to do and will exceed our budget, since we will built a modest residence. We would like to ask the city to consider deviation from original plan by allowing us to make a road from County rd 6,widening existing entrance to the north, ending at the intersection of two existing driveways approx.. 123 feet long.The rest of the driveway leading to the existing house at 2140 County Rd 6 will be shared only with one residence(our future house) and will be in line with city of Orono regulations. I hope, I made my proposal easy to read and understand. Sincerely, Mark Stipakov AW (612)598-4001 Also,Attached is copy of survey with marking of proposed road. 00'1-tl M „0i� ,blol0 S — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I o I sl M I I r7 in o oCo O 00 00 z I S9'8l l M 110C ,blol0 S n o ----------T-1 I I I I I I I OS � Q O O E-+ 3 F� i„02 ,tilal0 N Q w I o~Z I d 1 I L I a� `\ z �Wz ` \ I I I x \ `\\ W \ ` I 1 Ud 6\ d E- r C'U)oz \` Q O O E-+ 3 F� i„02 ,tilal0 N Q w Q d 1 I Q --� ---� `\ z �Wz ` \ I I I x \ `\\ E-+ ` \ ` I 1 Ud 6\ d E- Q O ou \\\ F� \ 0, (A / I K 7 W I II WEE `\ z �Wz ` \ I I I � ` `\\ \ ` I 1 I C'U)oz \` O �D z W�p o as \ E” d Q.z o v=v w as 9 wl�a E -1F-1 U •� E > d Ix xz 3 ao'. wZa W W o �0E c' �x Z w --7.Vo w J O y OO HI N O O O(3- C O Cr a is o o n Loc c°'o o �l U) a E w f N $cc"c Y W O Z J C _J O 2 0 O; y yN s V N 4 ._ a d C o >. O wvyno o `" 0o a U s c ,ca E_ w o o v � �' O EM C 1 m - V >yov� L_ D 1-1 r r- Q N m N U n 0 y U i C J J I C m 0 0 I6-264 \ \ I I C* \ 50 \ I I I I I I 10L __I I \ o a OB 09 1, ou \ ,I V)Wu \ 0, (A / I K 7 W I II 1 ` \ I I I � ` I I \ ` I 1 I \ \ I I C* \ 50 \ I I I I I I 10L __I I \ o a OB 09 1, I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 2, Block -1, PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRACE THIRD ADDITION 9 . denotes iron marker found HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 908,3908,3denotes proposed spot elevation 1032' 170 denotes existing contour line, per County maps Q '001) 00n -7n A 1 0011 C' 930 denotes proposed contour line Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of all visible utilities, septic areas, as shown on SP Testing drawing dated 6-24-98, building setbacks, trees, edge of wetlands as delineated by Jacobson Environmental and existing contours from County maps, and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. L 14-" SPRUCE 14" SPRUCE OLD IRCh IN BLACKTOP--• _----- DRIVVAY P----------- DRIVAY / / /RED PINE< ow 0 1008 CI; 0 01� —1010, T— o PROPOSED 24' WIDE BLACKTOP PRIVATE ROAD ..... PER CITY STANDARD TYPICAL SECTION RED PINE ROW < /0 PROPOSED SILT FENCE ---,I ami 1 808OREVISED.SCJ 1014- 70 L0 /0 /0 L0 SILT FENPROPOSED-­ LO CE 0 /0 L? 0 -10 103 /0;R Q) '\PR OED 103 EWA ... .... .... . ..... 7 37. \ 9 PATIO �) 73.0 6 B) 0 ry 00 N S8k : \ . .. — 7010 7.0 c� 7.0 0 6"x`12" WILLOW PROPOS jo 1034— 0 11�) 1008 HbUSE . %(Z) I\ 70, 0 /0 #2150 3 10 ... ------- U6— C\ o �0(A) 0 30" WILLOW -�PC P 0)\S E D rn ,,,/ S�TIC 15 SITE 1 0 0 T 2� V 0 WETLAND STAKE PER JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL 0 . .................. . 70 .. ....... ........ L0 Q � i ,I III i I �Qti � � I y POSED FIRE ('0 10" MAPLE CK TURNAROUND U 30II 1 00 1()08 &M"x2-12" PROPPSED-�,'� WILLOW i II j I ISILT ENCEI 11 I PROPbSEDI EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND PER JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL FUTURE 14" MAPE PROPOSED SEPTIC SILT FENCE z 00 10" SPRUCE C14 0 16� 4P—L,E 4P 2" oCq SPRUCE kc) ry/00 0 0 C) L0 0 U-\10 7 16 SPRUCE 0 (D L— — — — — — — — — C) V) 2-12" ASH 2 0716" T.7777 --1010— — OVERHEAD WIRES INV=(11005.1)— ----S 89054' 07" W- 372.17 PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION N 0 '\ ENTRANCE 0 00 OTH \AV h NO'. 12-28-17 PROPOSED HOUSE, DRIVEWAY AND GRADES I 2-22-18 PROPOSED ROAD DESIGNED, DELINEATED WETLANDS AND TREES LOCATED, SHOWN ON DRAWING 4-9-18 REVISED ROAD/DRIVEWAY C-4. -10 nhNu CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN, 55356 952-473-4141 83.0,0 N /88045' 3011 W 1 Garage = 1031.0 2) Top of foundation = 5-0-3-1--01 3) Main floor =D= 4) Basement == I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 M UJ=11.01 ;4 k 4,L. G R L A s w R n y; Iw I —1227 rr. Original Lot. Lot 4, Block 1 Phillips Woodland Terrace �� .. X84 �.��.R •7..--. 2 00 14e Y S //2 Ir ' n 9 = A r7i.,.. a 06 ...... 'y +gyp MIS —T 3 1 �F Y r I 577- Mg DICKS SEC. 200 sc�1e ,d 835 A+D- 74-1 . ►w 43a 77 LANE 2 I /.I W.` T "7: , or L-7 779r -6tli-Ave -N- 74.1a. W -m r---+vAll Pmhr2 - ft - Map layeTs Aj� t S. .%ll hv W.` T "7: , or L-7 779r -6tli-Ave -N- 74.1a. W -m r---+vAll Pmhr2 From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE: LA18-000012 Stipakov Survey 040918 Date: Thursday, April 12, 2018 2:12:26 PM Melanie, I've reviewed the subject plan with respect to the proposed road improvements and offer the following comments: 1. The street width and layout appears to confirm to city standards. 2. The plan calls for a hammer head in lieu of the required Cul-de-sac. As the road is less than 150ft long this seems an acceptable alternative to support service vehicle turn arounds. 3. The applicant should provide an easement for the portion of the road planned outside of the existing right of way. The easement should cover the proposed pavement plus end feet on each side. 4. The applicant will need to coordinate with Hennepin County for a right of way permit to allow for the connection to CSAH 6. Adam -----Original Message ----- From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:01 AM To: Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: LAI 8-000012 Stipakov Survey 040918 Adam Can you please review this revised plan for private road improvements, specifically including the departure from cul-de-sac design, and provide comments? This has been submitted to James Van Eyll for his comments as well. Thanks. Permit Application Application for Private / Residential Permit UID#: 323 Road: 6 Hennepin County Maintenance District: South Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Department (Roads and Bridges) - Operations 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 Permit is for the construction of Installation - Res (Permanent) - Residential, surfaced with Bituminous Applicant Property Owner Contractor Name: Mark N Stipakov Name: Mark N Stipakov Name: Mark N Stipakov Address: 2020 Salem Ct Address: 2020 Salem Ct Address: 2020 Salem Ct Orono, MN 55356 Orono, MN 55356 Orono, MN 55356 Phone: (612) 598-4001 Phone: (612) 598-4001 Phone: (612) 598-4001 Pager: Fax: Email: markstip@gmail.com Dates Entrance Needed By: 04/01/2018 Location The proposed entrance is on the N side of county road no. 6, 4 miles W of Cty rd 101. Street Address: 2150 County rd 6, Orono Plat Information Name of platted addition/subdivision: Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition Year of platted addition/subdivision: 1999 Lot: 2 Block: 1 Public Land Survey System Information Township: 118 Range: 23 Section: 27 Building Information Zoning Type: Construction Description: single family Permit acquired: No Driveway Width: 150 feet Present number of driveways: 0 Sketch n° 2150 Cty rd 6 N,Orono plat09122017.pdf na City Of Orono resolution 1024201 7.pdf Description of Work We would like to build driveway from County rd 6 to single family house to be constructed on that Iot.County Rd 6 is not nearly busy now in this part of Orono,since the construction of Hwy 12 bypassing city of Long Lake completed several years ago.Per City of Orono resolution 4369 on October 25th 1999 access was approved by Hennepin County for one additional lot General 1. No work shall be started until the application is approved and the permit issued. 2. Contact the Hennepin County Permit Office at 612-596-0339 a minimum of 2 business days prior to starting construction. 3. After driveway construction is completed, persons requesting the installation must notify the Permits Office that such work has been completed and is ready for final inspection and acceptance by Hennepin County. 4. No changes or alterations in entrances may be made at any time without written permission from the County Engineer or designee. 5. Approval of this permit does not deny the County Engineer the future right to revise, relocate or close any entrance to expedite the movements of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The County retains the right to close said entrance(s) at its discretion, based upon the necessity for traffic regulation, control and safety. 6. Existing driveways are not automatically perpetuated. In the event of a change in land use or a major change in the traffic pattern of the existing facility, new driveway applications may be required by the County. 7. Inclement weather shall be reason for delay of the project start or suspension of the project as determined by Hennepin County. 8. Permits or copies shall be kept on the work site, while work is in progress, in the custody of the individual in charge, and shall be exhibited upon request by any county official. 9. These general permit requirements and specifications shall be considered as forming an integral part of each and every permit issued for operations on county roadways. The work authorized by this permit shall be done at such time and in such manner as shall be consistent with the safety of the public and shall conform to all requirements and standards of the County of Hennepin as herein specified. If at any time, it shall be found by Hennepin County that the work is not being, or has not been, properly performed, the Permittee, upon being notified, shall immediately take the necessary steps, at their own expense, to place the work in conformance to said requirements or standards. In addition, no residential driveway may exceed 22 feet in width and no commercial driveway shall exceed the width dictated by the Hennepin County Access Management Guidelines. 10. In the event of failure or neglect, will or not, by said Permittee or Permittee's employees, to perform and comply with the prescribed conditions, restrictions and regulations, the Transportation Department may revoke and annul this permit and order said Permittee to immediately remove any and all structures or property belonging to said Permittee from the legal limits of the roadway or county property. 11. The installation shall be made in conformity with all applicable laws, regulations and codes covering said installations. All installations shall be made inconformity with regulations of governmental agencies for the protection of the public. 12. Americans with Disabilities Act - Any work in the County's rights-of-way that impacts any pedestrian facilities requires that the restoration of the pedestrian facilities impacted be restored to conform to current ADA requirements and standards. 13. If pavement, roadway or right -of way is damaged; same shall be restored, in a timely manner to its original or a better condition, at the sole expense of the Permittee. Permittee's failure to correct such damage in a timely manner will result in Hennepin County, through its own forces or contractors, making said repairs and billing Permittee for all costs and expenses related thereto. Permittee shall make payment to Hennepin County within fifteen (15) days of receipt of said bill. Permittee agrees that if it fails to make payment of said amounts within the specific time, to Hennepin County, it shall pay all costs relating to debt collection, including, but not limited to, court costs, frees, interest and attorney's fees. 14. No driving onto highway from ditch or driving on shoulders or over curbs where damage will occur. 15. It shall be further understood that the Permittee will be responsible for maintenance or repair of any and all failures due to settlement, erosion, lack of vegetation growth, rutting or other job related problems for a period of three (3) years after project completion and Notice of Work Completion form has been received by Hennepin County. Permittee shall perform all said maintenance. Immediately after it has been notified of said deficiency. Permittee shall be responsible for all costs and expenses related to said maintenance. Permittee's failure to perform said maintenance immediately will result in Hennepin Count, through its own forces or its contractors, performing said maintenance and billing Permittee for all costs and expenses related thereto. Permittee shall make payment to Hennepin County within fifteen (15) days of receipt of said bill. Permittee agrees, that if it fails to make payment of said amounts within the specified time, to Hennepin County, Permittee shall pay all costs related to debt collections, including, but not limited to, court costs, fees, interest and attorneys' fees. 16. Emergency Vehicle Accesses must be signed and closed to general traffic at all times. Continued unauthorized use of an Emergency Vehicle Access shall result in the removal of the access at the discretion of Hennepin County at the owner's expense. 17. Unless stated elsewhere in the Special Provisions, all access permits expire 1 year from the date that the permit is issued. Sediment Control & Drainage 1. Street surface and roadside shall be kept clean, neat and presentable throughout construction as determined by the Hennepin County Transportation Department. 2. Dust control shall be provided upon request of the Hennepin County Transportation Department. 3. The existing drainage patterns shall not be altered unless approved by Hennepin County Watershed District approval and drainage calculations are required if plan alters existing drainage patterns. 4. Permanent restoration plans must be submitted to the Permits Office for temporary restoration/winter stabilization for work occurring between November 1st and April 30th prior to starting construction. Site Plans - Private / Residential Applications for entrances serving private residences, farms or parking lots of less than five vehicle parking spaces need not submit a site plan, but shall make an appropriate sketch in the space provided on the from of this form. Such sketch shall generally locate the entrance, indicate its dimensions and location relative to right of way. Traffic Control 1. If the installation of this driveway makes it necessary to work on the roadway, traffic must be protected; proper temporary traffic control including lights, signs and proper barricades must be in place. Temporary traffic control must conform to the current version of the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control and/or accompanying Field Manual. Said devices shall be removed from the job site promptly upon completion of work. 2. Safety vests shall be worn by ANYONE occupying County right-of-way. 3. The Permittee shall use due diligence in the execution of the work authorized under this permit in order not to endanger or unnecessarily obstruct travel along the said highway. Operations shall be so conducted at all times as to permit safe and reasonably free travel over the roads within the limits of the work herein prescribed. All safety measures for the free movement of traffic shall be provided by the Permittee at its own cost. Payment method Payment details Credit Card Add another sketch Special Provisions Special provisions: • No special provisions Notes: Residential Driveway $125.00 Total: $125.00 After review of the completed permit application, Hennepin County is denying the request to place an additional access onto County Road 6 for the following reasons: Orono City Council Resolution 4369 provides that Outlot A of the Phillips Woodland Terrace 3rd Addition will contain a private road that provides access for Lots 1-3 within the plat. We believe that Outlot A would provide safe and reasonable access for Lot 2 Block 1, addressed as 2150 County Road 6, Orono. The City of Orono supports future access to Outlot A from 2150 County Road 6, Orono, and has stated that the intent of the configuration has been planned for some time. County 6 is a high speed road (55 mph) and the proposed driveway placement does not meet standards for adequate sight distance. For a 55 mph road, the minimum required distance is 550? as shown in the County Access Management Guidelines. County 6 is classified as a Rural Arterial. Rural Arterials with less than a 7,500 ADT (average daily traffic) require a 660? access spacing between existing driveways to be in compliance with Hennepin County access spacing guidelines. No direct driveway placement from Lot 2 Block 1 onto CSAH 6 would meet these guidelines since the distance between the existing driveway in Outlot A and the driveway for 2100 County Road 6 (to the east) is already approximately 600 feet. Is Approval Digital Signature Applicant Mark N. Stipakov - 12/21/2017 12:49 PM c7fc831d2a8660fab3b85f9ebbe0a693 17dd82e815fe6878018d06bc6f9f42b9 publicACCESS 2015 Minnesota Fire Code APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS The provisions contained in this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance. SECTION D101 GENERAL D101.1 Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code. SECTION D102 REQUIRED ACCESS D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds (34 050 kg). SECTION D103 MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders (see Figure D103.1). For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. s6' 28' R TYP. 26' 86 -FOOT DIAMETER CUL-DE-SAC 60 -FOOT ' Y" 60, - 60' 20' 2$'R TYP. 26• 120-FQ QT FIRM ME R H EAD 20' 26' 20' 20' MINIMUM CLEARANCE AROU NR A F IRE HYDRANT 28' R TYP. 70' 21 a©' ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO 120 -FOOT HAMMERHEAD FIGURE D103.1 DEAD-END FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD TURNAROUND D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade. Exception: Grades steeper than 10 percent as approved by the fire chief. D103.3 Turning radius. The minimum turning radius shall be determined by the fire code official. D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with TabI6 D103.4. m 0 Lu TABLE D103.4 LU REQUIREMENTS FOR DEAD-END ILL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS LENGTH (feet) WIDTH (feet) TURNAROUNDS REQUIRED 0-150 20 None required 151-500 20 120 -foot Hammerhead, 60 -foot "Y" or 96 -foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.1 501-750 26 120 -foot Hammerhead, 60 -foot "Y" or 96 -foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.1 Over 750 Special approval required For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. The minimum gate width shall be 20 feet (6096 mm). 2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the key(s) to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval by the fire code official. 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. D103.6 Signs. Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING—FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. SIGN TYPE 'A" SIGN TYPE 1C" SIGN TYPE 'W NO NO NO PARKING PARKING PARKING 18' FIRE LANE FIRE LANE FIRE LANE FIGURE D103.6 FIRE LANE SIGNS D103.6.1 Roads 20 to 26 feet in width. Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on both sides of fire apparatus access roads that are 20 to 26 feet wide (6096 to 7925 mm). D103.6.2 Roads more than 26 feet in width. Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on one side of fire apparatus access roads more than 26 feet wide (7925 mm) and less than 32 feet wide (9754 mm). SECTION D104 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. D104.2 Buildings exceeding 62,000 square feet in area. Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet (5760 m2) shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet (11 520 m2) that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. SECTION D105 AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roadse shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersectio6� of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. on D L1 D105.2 Width. w Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. SECTION D106 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS D106.1 Projects having more than 100 dwelling units. Multiple -family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings, including nonresidential occupancies, are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2. D106.2 Projects having more than 200 dwelling units. Multiple -family residential projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. SECTION D107 ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS D107.1 One- or two-family dwelling residential developments. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3. Exceptions: 1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 , 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the International Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required. 2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. D108 REFERENCED STANDARDS ASTM F2200-05 Standard Specification for Automated Vehicular Gate Construction D103.5 ICC IFC -12 International Fire Code D101.5, D107.1 UL 325-02 Door, Drapery, Gate, Louver, and Window Operators and Systems, with Revisions through February 2006 D103.5 Y U Q m W W LL ��� JAI/ CiTyof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ 42"0 2. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELEVIINARY APPROVAL FOR A CLASS II SUBDIVISION AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2140 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - FILE NO. 2430 D WHEREAS, Paul R. Phillips and Mary B. Phillips (hereinafter the "subdividers") on October 26, 1998, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 1, BIock 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace, Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on November 16, 1998, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on November 23, 1998, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdividers noting the following findings of fact: i. The property is located within the RR -1B, One Family Rural Residential District, requiring 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each lot. 2. The property contains a total of 4.5 acres, including a low area on the proposed Lot 2 which impacts the suitable area for septic systems. 3. The proposed plat contains two lots as follows: A. Lot 1, located in both Orono and Medina, with an existing residence, proposed at 2.0 acres. Lot 2, proposed to be 2.0 acres. Page 1 of 5 off` 0�o CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, 4202 B. Outlot A, to provide access to three zoning lots (the new lot, 2140 and 2160 Sixth Avenue North). 4. The property is not located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and shall be developed under rural standards. 5. Septic testing has been approved by the City and confirms that each lot has suitable area for the development of a primary and alternate septic system. 6. Hennepin County has approved access to the new Lot 2 via an existing curb cut. 7. Lot 2 can be developed for residential use without the need to grant variances to the applicable zoning standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Paul R. Phillips and Mary B. Phillips for the property located at 2140 Sixth Avenue North per the survey dated September 23, 1998, most revised October 26, 1998, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. A grading and drainage erosion control plan for the entire site shall be submitted for review. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to any grading. Additional erosion control measures will be needed during construction on Lot 2. 2. The site drains westerly to an existing wetland identified as LL -P4. Phosphorous loadings leaving the site shall be limited to a maximum of .28 lbs./acre/year. The low area west of the septic location on Lot 2 may serve as a water quality pond to provide rate control and nutrient removal for stormwater. A drainage area map and ponding calculations shall be provided with the final plan set. 3. Drainage and utility easements shall be 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet along the road right-of-ways. Drainage easements shall be provided along all wetland, drainage, and pond areas. Page 2 of 5 ���o �'\ 0 o' *0 V, ,�tt N ti GSI CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -_4202 4. The applicant shall execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway in Outlot A, and to define future financial obligation of the owners of 2140 and 2160 Sixth Avenue North at such time the driveway is upgraded to City standards to serve a third residence on Lot 2. 5. The applicant shall grant to the City an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot A. 6. Protection of drainfield sites via fencing shall be in place during construction of the driveway improvements to serve Lot 2 and drainage improvements. 7. No building permit will be issued for Lot 2 until the construction of driveway and drainage improvements is complete. 8. No curb cut/access for Lot 2 will be allowed on Sixth Avenue North except via Outlot A. The outlot is the only location that meets the recommended sight distance minimum to the east. 9. The Northwest Hennepin League of Municipalities Integrated Park Trail System, dated December 1995, as prepared by SRF Consultants, designates Sixth Avenue North as an existing local bike trail. The Orono Parks Commission has identified Sixth Avenue North as an area where wide shoulder bike routes are preferred at a width of 6 to 8 feet. 10. Lot 1, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Second Addition was platted in 1986. A park dedication fee of $400 was paid at that time for the entire subdivision. The existing residence at 2140 Sixth Avenue North is included in the 1986 park dedication fee. 11. The Hennepin County Assessor has determined the fair market value of undeveloped Lot 2 to be $70,000. The park dedication fee per Section 11.62 of the Municipal Code and Resolution 4064 shall be $4,900. The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. Required submittals are as follows: Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 420-2--- 1. 20-2--- 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, dated September 23, 1998, most revised October 26, 1998. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines.. C. Naming of plat. D. Maintenance and ownership agreement for Outlot A. 2. Legal .documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The subdividers shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. The subdividers to dedicate to the City a road and utility easement granting permanent access, improvement, and utility easements over said Outlot A. D. The subdividers have created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefitting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein all abutting and/or benefitting owners agree to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said future Outlot A. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $5,300* A. Final plat fee = $200 B. Legal review fees = $200 Page 4 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.' , 4202 - C. Park dedication fee for Lot 2 = $4,900 * Upon approval of the preliminary plat, the subdivision shall be referred to the City Assessor to determine value in accordance with Section 11.62 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 23rd day of November, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabrie abbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of November, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NOTA.RYFUBLIC-M 'NEV ESGTA �, .";.' HFNNEFIA+CGJNTY Notary Public WY Crmrnsssien Ea;in?s Jo. 3'. 20r9 Page 5 of 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 23, 1998 (#2428 Terry Maurer, continued) Kelley inquired whether the City does have procedures in place for inspecting the driveways. Weinberger stated yes, they do. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Application #2428, 2515 Kelly Avenue, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4201, a Resolution Granting Variances to allow an accessory structure to remain on the proeprty without a principal structure, and variances in hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback and in the 250-500' lakeshore setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#11) #2430 PAUL PHILLIPS, 2140 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 4202 Paul Phillips was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant is proposing to divide his 4.5 acre homestead parcel into two lots. Each lot would contain 2.0 acres served by a .5 acre outlot. The Planning Commission reviewed this application and had a concern whether a cul-de-sac was necessary, and determined that a cul-de-sac was not necessary based on the location of the existing residences and driveway. The majority felt that the proposed subdivision met the intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinance. • The Fire Department and Police Department have received this plan and wanted to insure that the road had the proper width for emergency vehicles to get in and out. • Van Zomeren stated that the Applicant has previously paid a park dedication fee of $400 for the one lot and will need to pay $4900.00 on the other lot. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view he does not think the cul-de-sac is warranted in this case. Van Zomeren remarked that the septic sites have to be taken into consideration when platting the cul-de-sac and if a cul-de-sac is required, the lots would not meet the two acre minimum. Mayor Jabbour commented that the ordinance requiring cul-de-sacs might need to be reviewed since there is some confusion over when a cul-de-sac is required. Flint noted there is some ambiguity concerning the stormwater ponding and that the MCWD has indicated via a telephone call that they will not require stormwater ponding for this subdivision. Flint inquired how the City will be regulating the drainage on this parcel. Mayor Jabbour stated it has been the philosophy and practice of the City Council to have each property owner be responsible for their water runoff, and the City is merely checking with the MCWD to verify that there are no other issues that need to be reviewed and drainage is subject to final review and approval by the City Engineer. Phillips stated he has no problem with drainage. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City is trying to insure that everyone understands the policy of the City as it pertains to drainage. Page 16 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 23, 1998 (#2430 Paul Phillips, continued) Van Zomeren stated that some template language could be added to the resolution reflecting the City Engineer's letter. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2430, 2140 Sixth Avenue North, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4202, a Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval for a Class II Subdivision, subject to the inclusion of the template language in the resolution reflecting the City Engineer's views on the stormwater issues. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ("#12) #2435 JEFF LITZAU - LUTZ CONSTRUCTION, 3433 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4203 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2435, 3433 Livingston Avenue, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4203, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Lot Area and Lot Width. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#13) #2437 JEFF MARTINEAU, 2565 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4204 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2437, 2565 North Shore Drive, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4204, a Resolution Granting Variances to Average Lakeshore Setback and Hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. • (*#14) #2438 MICHAEL SLETTEN, 4680 BAYSIDE ROAD - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4205 Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2438, 4680 Bayside Road, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4205, a Resolution Approving a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement of a Property Located at 2680 Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Item #15 follows Item #18) (#18) JOE FIEDLER - REFUND APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4208 Joe Fiedler was present. Barrett suggested that Paragraph #2 on page three be stricken from the draft. Moorse indicated that that paragraph has already been stricken. Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4208, a Resolution Approving a Partial Refund of Sewer Assessment for 373 Westlake Street. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Peterson and Goetten opposed. (#15) #2439 SERVICE 800, INC., 2190 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN • REVIEW - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4206 Page 17 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 25, 1999 • Jabbour amended his motion to include denial of the comprehensive plan amendment to guide the land use designation from two acre density to one acre density. Peterson seconded the motion. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. There were no public comments. VOTE ON MOTION: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#6) #2531 ROGER AND ELIZABETH OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4367 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4367, a Resolution Granting Renewal of Variances to Allow Remodeling and Expansion of the Existing Residence Located at 815 Partenwood Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#7) #2538 ROB AND TORI JAFFRAY, 540 BARRETT AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4368 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4368 a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Construction of Dormers on the Second Story of an Existing Residence Located at 540 Barrett Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#8) #2541 PAUL PHILLIPS, 2140 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, FINAL PLAT OF PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRACE THIRD ADDITION - RESOLUTION NO. 4369 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4369, A Resolution Approving the Plat of Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#9) REQUEST FOR DOCK ACCESS - DAVID LOVELACE, 220 BIG ISLAND David Lovelace, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting dock access to his property located at 220 Big Island. Back in April, 1999, the City Council granted a lot area variance for this property to permit the construction of a seasonal dwelling on the property. As of today's date, the City has not received a request for a building permit from the Applicant. The property is 4.3 acres in size and is landlocked. This property is one of several lots on Big Island that potentially will request dock rights. Weinberger stated that according to Municipal Code, installing, maintaining, keeping or using a • private dock on any platted public right-of-way, when such a dock has been specifically authorized as part of a permit issued by the Council, is allowed. Not more than one seasonal dock Page 7 TRANSFER ENTERED NENNEPIN COMT'Y TAXPAYER SERV#GES DEC 2g 1999 ; �.Ilk �:7 .. '5 0 My,, -&v q(q STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION # } -.9 72368 OFFICE OF S:'',:`' i Y RECO"DER NEN3dI_PW C t t#iY° MINNESOTA CERTIFIM rI! r7 AIE0 OR KL qt" i:; 0 CN 99 OEC 29 Ali 12'. 31 723698 DEPUTY I, Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on October 25 1999 is a true and correct copy of said resolution duly adopted by said City Council at said that the same In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this Ist day of November , 19 99 . Linda S. Vee, City CIerk rj. 04��0 �4 CITY of ORONO ti �~ RESOLUTION OF THE C14Y COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRACE THIRD ADDITION FILE NO. 2541 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision'of a two (2) lot residential development by Paul R. Phillips and Mary B. Phillips (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR -1B, 2 Acre Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a single family residence to be fully developed; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1 • Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4202, the resolution granting Preliminary approval of the Class Ii subdivision. 2. Dedication on the plat of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. 3. Declaration of private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance has been developed for ownership and maintenance of the private road to be located within Outlot A. The property owners of Lot 3, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace; Lot 1, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition;.Lot 1, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition shall also be responsible for maintenance and construction of the private road based on the conditions set forth in the Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance. Page 1 of 4 J%f ti CITY of 01RONo RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL _J NO. 4 8 o 4. Subdivider has granted to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for Outlot A. Creation of covenants for all Lot 2, Block 1 for protection of drainfield sites, including protective language for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites, and alerting future property owners of the need to protect sites on adjacent properties. b. Payment to the City for the final plat review fee and fee for legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $400.00. 7. Payment to the City for park dedication fees for the creation of one (1) new lot in the amount of $4,900. 8. All Iots shall have access to the private road to be located within Outlot A. 9• Hennepin County has approved the access for one additional lot on County Road 6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions; 1. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced off prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain in place until such time the individual lot is developed and the City Septic Inspector authorizes removal. 2. The City Engineer approves the grading and drainage plan prior to releasing the plat for filing with Hennepin County. Prior to City release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements and requirements of Preliminary Plat approval as may be required by the City Attorney Page 2 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolution in a format acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing, and shall complete all conditions to the satisfaction of City staff, prior to release of the plat for filing. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before April 18, 2000 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono ,,for subdivision review. Dated this 25th day of October, 1999. Vie' City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day oil October, 1999 by Gabriel Iabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 CO q 0 p Q n o C fl ° � 1y11 C • s F� s = D� = •1a 00 0<. a S a y 'e Q . � y 4J e =aoNq aw W 3 $ • c k I O P • O I �• Fp p'b•°> c i•'° • � i � ° u l O b ° p 'I 1� �— �� e 0 s� I I I r•'n to sZ eP NZ�"d W g� v 4a5 o`n$•w 6 4! mE N �'Q abd a, • S a •-•a n 3 0Z. 33 pEJB$ •9 w Wa WY1'gcd y a A Je S e ' d 20 MO 11 $ e b Yg`p z°v°Sa-w� d oOsel • .ornl.m s e Ivc -T,, � �, Iglc-'cr..--• r t I I I O P • O I �• � PZ b i•'° • � i � ° u l O b ° p 'I 1� �— �� e 0 s� I I I r•'n to sZ eP me W g� v 4a5 o`n$•w e0 Iae Ind Him ~ O - CI'I � a a e`e� O0 u•d gl n9 � •n nI,Z ¢:oE$erV a 9e M 20 MO cU o Zug 5,z u°3d WOti -Se e33o� Oa O s= a~9� 1 O's O�O IQ C w oOsel • .ornl.m s -T,, � �, Iglc-'cr..--• r t I I I I ! , ! I L I I I 1 ! 1 I gl 1 i # I ul I 1 1 L m; I 1 1 I I , 1 • I I '• 1 I ---------------=----------------------------' 1 O 0rwr 3 MM.&Ox -+ %-1(200/� 4of4 nm ".oc M.IoS I f J V I V 1 A v M I � ! SS I !g I = 0 7236200 ROAD AND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made thisl8th day of August , 19 99, by and between Paul R. Phillips as Trustee of the Paul R. * , hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)", and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee." *Phillips Revocable Trust under Agreement dated November 3, 1997 WITNESSETH, that Grantor(s), in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration given by Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public ingress, egress, access, road and utilities purposes and uses, on, across and under the land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, as follows: Outlot A, Phillips Woodland -Terrace Third Addition including, but not by way of limitation, a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct, install, maintain, operate and repair a sanitary sewer interceptor, lift station, main or line, a water main or line, gravel or paved road and any and all appurtenances, including drainage control structures, incidental and related thereto, (such are hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvement), and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and advisable to the construction installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the Improvement. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns, permanently. The Grantor(s) herein certify that the lands herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances except: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor(s) have set their hand(s) on the day and year first above written. au I K. Phi STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this 18th day of August 19c ,before me personally appeared Paul R. Phillips, as Trustee of the Pau 1 * to me known to be the person(s) described in and who signed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge that)they executed same asfr free act and deed. his *R. Phillips Revocable Trust under Agreement dated November 3, 1997 k—x--�-Vj NOTARY PUBLIC STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: 1ACt'IAaT HOEK" NOTARYPUBU MINNE M .,M NyCommisslonB &31,2000 This instrument is drafted by: LMMM POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 333-4800 1 !,ND PRIOR TAXES PAW TA} PMER SERVICES TRANSFER ENTERED DEC 28 I= F-PlttCOUNTY MAN. AA oiveuT n rn PZ— '71 Cy rric en n rn PZ— '71 Cy 'D F!Cl,4 TAXES PAR TAXPAYER SERVICES TRANSFF-R ENTEREO DEC 2$ 09 E SPIN WUNTY MINk -------------------------------------------------- DECLARATION OF PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF SAME KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; OFFICE CcI YMINNA 7236204 CERTIFire F=LED AND OR RECUJED &N 99 DEC 29 AM 12: 31 :. 'Z -_ 'DEPUTY WHEREAS, Paul R. Phillips as Trustee of Paul R. Phillips Revocable Trust under Agreement dated November 3, 1997, (hereinafter "the subdivider") is the fee owner of that certain parcels of real estate located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition; Lot 2, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition; and Outlot A, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition according to the plat of that name on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin, County; and WHEREAS, the subdivider now. desires to create a non-exclusive private road easement for driveway, ingress and egress, drainage and utility purposes over and across Outlot A, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition except the most Westerly 50 feet thereof. (hereinafter "the private road") for the mutual benefit of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition. 1 WHEREAS, Subdivider acknowledges that there appears of record a Declaration of Easement dated July 1, 1986, filed March 21, 1990, as Document No. 5643591 creating a driveway easement over The most Westerly 50 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace (now The most Westerly 50 feet of Outlot A, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition). Further, that when the plat of Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition is recorded, said Declaration of Easement, Document No. 5643591 will, by it's benefit and provide access for the following properties: Lot 3, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace; Lot 1, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition; and Lot 2, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition EASEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in addition to any easements created by any other Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements, including, but not limited to, Declaration of easement, Document No. 5643591, the Subdivider does by this Declaration for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby declares, grants, and creates a non-exclusive easement for driveway, ingress and egress, drainage and utility purposes over and across the following property: Outlot A, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition except the most Westerly 50 feet thereof for the mutual benefit of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Phillips Woodland Terrace Third Addition, (hereinafter "benefitted lots"), and MAINTENANCE WHEREAS, the subdivider is the sole owner of the private road and all the benefitted lots. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the receipt of One Dollar ($1.00) and the granting of the above private road easement for the benefitted lots, the above owner of each benefitted lot, his assigns and successors (hereinafter referred to as owners or owner) hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. That the owners do hereby acknowledge the existence of said private road easement and the existence of the private road, which is not a publicly dedicated roadway, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to maintain or service said private road, and that the City of Orono does not intend to acquire or open said private road as a public roadway. 2 2. That the owners will and do hereby assume and agree to pay a proportionate share of the costs of constructing, maintaining, repairing and replacing, if necessary, the private road over said easement described herein to at least a standard of quality equal to a private road, and as may be required from time to time by the ordinances of the City of Orono in regard to private roads. Each owner's share of such costs shall be due and payable on the date such costs for construction, maintenance or repair are due and payable to the person or entity rendering an accounting therefore. Each owner's share of such costs shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8 %) per annum from such due date to the date of payment. Any owner may bring action, on behalf of the non -defaulting Owners, to collect a defaulting Owner's share of such costs which are not paid when due, and shall be entitled to recover such reasonable attorney's fees as the court may allow, together with all necessary costs and disbursements incurred in connection therewith. No Owner may exempt himself from the liability for assessments by waiver of the use or enjoyment of any of the private road or by the abandonment of his lot. In the event that the Owners of each Lot described herein fail to construct, maintain, repair or replace the private road as provided for herein, it is agreed by all parties that the City of Orono may undertake to construct, maintain, repair and replace the private road as provided for herein, and that such actions by the City of Orono, will not result in the private road's becoming a public roadway, and that each of the Owners will pay to the City of Orono one-half (112) of the cost incurred by the City of Orono within thirty (34) days of the receipt of such charges, or else such charge shall become a lien upon each Lot at the proportion as provided for herein. Said half shares are to be determined by dividing the total costs of construction, maintenance, repair, or replacement, including without limitation, the cost of cleaning, snow removal, surfacing and resurfacing, by two; and each Owner shall become liable for their share from and after the date of this Declaration. 3. Each of the Owners of a Lot described herein hereby covenants with each of the Owners of the other Lot described herein, and each Owner of a Lot described herein, by acceptance of a deed therefore, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such conveyance, shall be and hereby is deemed to covenant with the then Owners of the other Lot described herein, that he/she/they shall pay promptly when due his/her/their share of the costs described in the preceding paragraph. The costs described in the preceding paragraph shall be a personal obligation of the person or persons who are the owner(s) of such Lot at the time when such costs were incurred, and said obligation shall not pass to his/her/their successors in title unless expressly assumed by them. 4. The private road shall be used strictly in accordance within the easements granted therefore. Except as herein provided, no Owner shall obstruct or interfere whatsoever with the rights and privileged of other Owner in the private road and nothing shall be planted, altered, constructed upon or removed by an Owner from the private road. K3 If an Owner shall violate this section, the remaining Owners shall have the right to restore the private road to its prior condition and assess the cost of such restoration against the Owner who violates this section and such assessment shall become due and payable upon demand of the remaining Owners. All of the remaining Owners, or any of them shall have the right and power to collect the cost of such restorations in a legal proceeding for that purpose. If an Owner interferes with the rights and privileges of another Owner in the use of the private road, except as herein provided, the remaining Owners, or any of them, may commence an action to enjoin such interferences and the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover such reasonable attorney's fees as the court may allow, together with all necessary costs and disbursements incurred in connection therewith. No Owner shall obstruct or interfere with the passage of any vehicle, school bus, or emergency vehicle over or across said private road. Any Owner may delegate his right of enjoyment to the private road to his tenants who reside on a Lot, to the members of his family and his guests and to his invitees. 5. This covenant shall run with the land and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto executed this easement and covenant the day and year first above written. Paul R. Phillips" T' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z,2, day of by Paul R. Phillips as Trustee of Paul R. Phillips Revocable Truk und& Agreement dated November 3, 1997. NOTAe--MINNESOTA WR GHT 7" My Cc;r;m. Exp' ms ka 1. _OCQ 4 Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Michael T. Hoekstra Attorney at Law 19075 Easton Road Wayzata, MN 55391-3126 (612) 473-9374 RUN DATE: 02/13/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) 38 27-118-23 310002 38 27-118-23 310028 TRINITY ENG EVAN LUTH CH INC S R GIBSON & R D GIBSON 2060 SIXTH AVE N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STEVEN R GIBSON 2060 6TH AVE N RACHEL D GIBSON LONG LAKE MN 55356 4070 WILD MEADOW DR ORONO MN 55356 MEDINA MN 55340 38 27-118-23 310005 38 27-118-23 32 0008 JACOB SELSETH/AMANDA SELSETH J SWEARINGEN/L SWEARINGEN 2135 SIXTH AVE N 1180 PHILLIPS DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JACOB SELSETH JESSICA M SWEARINGEN AMANDA SELSETH LANCE L SWEARINGEN 2135 CO RD 6 1180 PHILLIPS DR ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 310014 38 27-118-23 32 0009 B W DEWITT & M H DEWITT D DENNISTON & M DENNISTON 2145 SIXTH AVE N 1200 PHILLIPS DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRUCE W & MELANIE H DEWITT DAVID & MICHELLE DENNISTON 2145 SIXTH AVE N 1200 PHILLIPS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 310017 38 27-118-23 32 0016 WILLIAM TYLER & MIKI MORI SARAH M KOSTIAL 2160 SIXTH AVE N 1115 COX FARM RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 WILLIAM TYLER & MIKI MORI SARAH M KOSTIAL SARAH L SCHERER 1115 COX FARM RD 2160 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 310021 80 27-118-23 24 0001 G R WAGENER & L L WAGENER DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1120 COX FARM RD 80 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 MEDINA MN 00000 GREGORY R WAGENER DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT LAURA L WAGENER ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 1120 COX FARM RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 27-118-23 310022 80 27-118-23 24 0003 L O EVERSON & K A EVERSON WILLIAM TYLER & MIKI MORI 1090 COX FARM RD 2160 SIXTH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 MEDINA MN 55356 LANCE O & KRISTI A EVERSON WILLIAM TYLER & MIKI MORI 1090 COX FARM RD SARAH L SC14ERER LONG LAKE MN 55356 2160 SIXTH AVEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 310024 80 27-118-23 24 0005 ORONO WOODLANDS INC KIMERLIE LEZA GERACI 2100 SIXTH AVE N 1250 PHILLIPS DR ORONO MN 55356 MEDINA MN 55356 ORONO WOODLANDS INC KIMERLIE LEZA GERACI 2100 SIXTH AVE N 1250 PHILLIPS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 310025 80 27-118-23 24 0010 BRADLEY W PANKONIN ET AL S R GIBSON & R D GIBSON 2085 SIXTH AVE N 2140 SIXTH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 MEDINA MN 55356 BRADLEY W PANKONIN STEVEN R GIBSON MARCIA S PANKONIN RACHEL D GIBSON 2085 6TH AVE N 4070 WILD MEADOW DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 MEDINA MN 55340 38 27-118-23 310026 S R GIBSON & R D GIBSON 2140 SIXTH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 STEVEN R GIBSON RACHEL D GIBSON 4070 WILD MEADOW DR MEDINA MN 55340 38 27-118-23 310027 MARK STIPAKOV & I STIPAKOV 2150 SIXTH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 MARK STIPAKOV IZABELLA STIPAKOV 2020 SALEM CT ORONO MN 55356 PAGE: 1 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 2/13/2018 1250 1200 (2) 1200 As. x- 1180 (e) 1115 1120 (21) 1115 1120 `:050 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 2150 Sixth Ave N 216V (3) 2160 (17) 0 1090 (22) E 2140 (10) 2140 (24) (26) 2100 2060 (27) �6 thiFA 2145 2145 (14) 2140 (12) 2135 I,/ 2085 213 I LiYb 2bou 0 60 120 240 ft I I I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Item 5 Date Application Received: 03/20/18 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/20/18 60 - Day Review Period Expires: 05/18/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 16 April 2018 Subject: #LA18-000034, Apex Holdings LLC (Sanjeev Mangalick), 2635 Kelley Parkway, Final Plat; Final Master Development Plan; and Rezoning Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting final plat approval including final master development plan and rezoning to RPUD for the 70 unit senior housing project [reviewed under application numbers: 17-3948; 17-3956; 17-3957; & 17-3958]. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background This project for a 70 -unit senior housing use went through a sketch plan review in 2016; and received preliminary approval in 2017. The Comprehensive Plan amendment was approved by the City in August 2017; the final approval of the amendment was granted by the Metropolitan Council in October, 2017. The final approval process requires three actions: final plat approval; final master development plan approval; and rezoning from RR-113PUD to RPUD. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET The concept master plan was approved with flexibility from specific sections of the RPUD requirements as summarized in the table below. The proposed building and site plan is consistent with the original plan. This development requires flexibility from the RPUD district lot standards for attached dwelling units. This table identifies specific standards requiring flexibility, which the City Council approved via Resolution No. 6786. RPUD District Minimum SFR Standard proposed lot Standards Flexibility Required? Minimum project size: 5 acres 3.5 No Building Setback (Kelley Parkway) 35 45 No Building setback (Wayzata Blvd) 50 54 No Minimum side yard setback: 35 feet 37 feet No Maximum FAR: 1 0.52 No Parking lot and driving lane setback 20' 8-27 feet Yes Private Recreational Area: 10% of gross area 10.5% proposed Granted Building height: Maximum of 30 feet 30' No Number of stories 3 (Max.) 2 No Hardcover 50% 63% Yes FILE #LA18-000034 16 April 18 Page 2 of 3 Plan Review Comments Number & Type of Units: Parking: The two story building reflects 70 units: 22 memory care; 24 assisted living; and 24 independent living units. This is consistent with the number of units approved within the concept plan review. Per Met Council, all units count toward the city's density calculation. Site Plan: The final site plan is consistent with the approved preliminary plans with the addition of the modifications directed by Resolution No. 6786. There are outstanding comments from the City's engineer which should be addressed by the developer prior to the City Council review. Parking: The plan reflects 85 total parking stalls: 46 surface spaces; and 39 located in the underground garage. This is consistent with the number approved within the concept plan review. Architecture: The Stonebay development has established a certain design characteristic. During the concept review Staff recommended that the building materials be consistent with the pattern established by the Stonebay development, and include architectural shingles, cement/ fiber board siding, brick and/ or stone. The materials appear to be consistent with the Stonebay development and are detailed in the final master plan (Exhibit F7 -sheet A 5.0). Final Plat. Final Plat is necessary to re -plat, not subdivide, Outlot D to a buildable lot. Platting Fees: Below is a summary of the fees, collectible in full at the time of approval of the final plat. These fees have been recalculated to reflect the current (2018) Fee Schedule. Park Dedication Fee: $3,250/unit x 70 (# of units) _ $227,500.00 Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee: Residential > 4 units/acre: $8,490/ac x 3.5 acres = $29,715.00 TOTAL: $257,215.00 uue at ine time or permit: Met Council SAC Fee: TBD by the Metropolitan Council Sewer Connection Charge: $5,100 x # of SAC units = $ TBD* Water Connection Charge: $4,240 x # of SAC units = $ TBD* *Sewer & Water connection charges will be due with the SAC fee at the time of the building permit. Engineer Comments The City's consulting engineer has provided a detailed review and comments on the plans. Those comments are attached as Exhibit H. The developer should address all applicable comments prior to placement on the City Council's agenda for final action. Public Comments To date, no additional public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the proposed building and site layout are consistent with approved concept plan? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? FILE #LA18-000034 16 April 18 Page 3 of 3 Planning Staff Recommendation The final plans as submitted are generally consistent with the previously reviewed, preliminary set. The developer should address the comments from our engineer prior to placement on the City Council agenda for final review and approval. Additionally, the developer should comply with the permitting requirements from the MCWD and Hennepin County, as necessary. Staff recommends approval of the master development plan; approval of rezoning to RPUD; and final plat conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of the City's consulting engineer, and permitting requirements of the other regulatory agencies. The City Attorney is drafting a development agreement to outline the developer's responsibilities. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Resolution No. 6786 Exhibit C. Met Council Approval letter 10/26/17 Exhibit D. Final Plat Drawing Exhibit E. Final Civil Drawings / Site Plan Exhibit F. Final Building Plans and Elevations Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. City Engineer Memo 04/09/18 Exhibit 1. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/20/2018 Address: 2635 KELLEY PKWY LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 3311823120009 Land Use Number: LA18-000034 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: APEX HOLDINGS LLC Address: 16135 55TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 Applicant: Name: Gretchen Schroeder Address: Project Description: Senior Housing Development Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application ,' Subdivision Application 11,u� �w� Applicant Signature: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6786 NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN, AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, ZONE CHANGE, AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2635 KELLEY PARKWAY - FILE NO. 17-3948 WHEREAS, Apex Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter the "Developer") is owner of the property located at 2635 Kelley Parkway within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Outlot D, Stonebay Addition (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested General Concept Plan, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat Approval for development of the Property. Proposed is a rezoning from RR -1 B PUD, One Family Rural Residential District Planned Unit Development to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District for construction of a 70- unit Senior Housing, Assisted Living, and Memory care facility; and WHEREAS, the Developer has concurrently requested an amendment of the 2008- 2030 Orono Community Management Plan ("CMP") to change the proposed land use from Office to High Density Residential and allow said development at a density of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre, where no residential density is prescribed in the CMP; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017 the Developer filed a complete formal application with the City for Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and concept plan & preliminary plat approval for a 70 unit senior care facility on the Property; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application and reviewed it on July 17, 2017, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission information, published for the July 17, 2017 meeting, including staff report and exhibits, is incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on July 17, 2017 recommended on a vote Page 1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 67 8 6 of 7-0 that the Council grant the proposed CMP; the rezoning to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District; grant Conditional Use Permit, grant general concept plan, and preliminary plat approval subject to a number of conditions and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council reviewed the sketch plan for the Property in September 2016, and has reviewed the formal applications at its regular meeting on August 14, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby makes the following findings in regard to this application for RPUD General Concept Plan, Preliminary Plat approval, CMP amendment, Conditional Use Permit and rezoning: FINDINGS A. Community Management Plan Conformity, CMP Amendment 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3948. 2. The Property is currently zoned RR -1 B PUD as part of the Stone Bay development, The Property contains approximately 3.5 acres. The Stonebay Master Plan suggests an office use for the property. The CMP guides the property as office. 3. The property has sat vacant for many years; the city recognizes that there is not a market, nor is one likely, for office uses on the subject parcel. 4. The Metropolitan Council established density goals for the City of Orono, and the city responded by carefully selecting parcels at densities that would potentially allow for more affordable housing options. Metropolitan Council guidelines require an overall new sewered development density of at least 3 units per acre. In order to meet these goals, certain parcels within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) were guided for densities significantly higher than 3 units/acre — to allow those shoreland areas in the MUSA historically zoned and planned for low density, to develop at the 1 -acre and 2 -acre lot sizes desired by the City. Recent developments within the MUSA have been approved at densities lower that prescribed in the CMP. 6. The city desires to identify additional areas appropriate for high density residential within the community. The rationale for the density increase at this site was Page 2 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6786 primarily the location adjacent to a high -traffic roadway; the availability of municipal utility services; and the remote location from single family residential development. 7. The City Council has reviewed the development proposal with regards to the CMP and finds that it meets a number of goals for housing as established within the Housing element of the CMP, including: - Provides opportunities for housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. - Provides housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. B. Rezoning from RR -1 B to RPUD 8. The Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is intended to be developed using municipal sewer and water, a requirement of the RPUD zoning district. 9. Because the property is proposed to be reguided in the CMP for high density residential, the property should be rezoned consistent with the intended and guided use. The most appropriate zoning for the intended use is RPUD, Residential Planned Unit Development District. 10. The property contains approximately 3.5 acres. The property meets the lot size requirements of Zoning Code Section 78-626(1) for rezoning to RPUD because it is part of a larger Planned Unit Development, Stonebay. 11. Rezoning the property to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development is appropriate based on the High- Density residential nature of the proposal, which meets the following general purposes of the RPUD District: a) incorporates flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; b) provides lifecycle housing with the potential to meet affordable and moderate cost housing needs; c) incorporates energy conservation through the clustering of buildings and land Page 3 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6786 uses; d) preserves desirable site characteristics and open space; e) provides design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; f) results in a sensitive development in the transitional area located between a high capacity roadway and the high density housing to the north; and g) yields development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding for higher density than the typical urban and rural residential development in Orono. 12. Conformity with Zoning District Standards. In relation to the RPUD standards, there are specific guidelines for development in Zoning Code Section 78-626(7), including Setbacks, Height limitations, and outside storage limitations. However, the concept of a planned unit development process is to allow flexibility in design. Section 78-626(16) provides for flexibility in RPUD standards, as follows: (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. This proposed development concept requires flexibility from the RPUD district lot standards for attached dwelling units. The table below identifies specific standards which require flexibility, which the City Council finds acceptable: Page 4 �o�o CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �� N O . 7 6 �FSHo'V C. Conditional Use Permit for Assisted Living 13. As required in Section 78-624 (2) Assisted living facilities are a conditional use in the RPUD zoning district. The Council finds, in the review of the standards for granting a Conditional Use: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The Community Management plan maps the site for office use. The Commission is considering an amendment to the Community Management Plan, if approved the use would be consistent. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed rezoning to RPUD would allow for consistency with use regulations. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The property was laid out to accommodate an office use. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served by municipal water and sanitary sewer Page 5 RPUD District Proposed lot Flexibility Minimum SFR Standards Required? Standard Minimum project size: 5 acres 3.5 No Building Setback (Kelley Parkway) 35 44 No Building setback (Wayzata Blvd) 50 54 No Minimum side yard setback: 35 feet 37 feet No Maximum FAR: 1 0.52 No Parking lot and driving lane setback 20' 8-27 feet Yes Private Recreational Area: 10% of roses project 11% proposed No area Building height: Maximum of 30 feet appx 32' Yes Number of stories 3 (Max.) 2 No Hardcover 50% 63% Yes C. Conditional Use Permit for Assisted Living 13. As required in Section 78-624 (2) Assisted living facilities are a conditional use in the RPUD zoning district. The Council finds, in the review of the standards for granting a Conditional Use: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The Community Management plan maps the site for office use. The Commission is considering an amendment to the Community Management Plan, if approved the use would be consistent. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed rezoning to RPUD would allow for consistency with use regulations. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The property was laid out to accommodate an office use. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served by municipal water and sanitary sewer Page 5 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6786 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; No additional public service costs associated with the proposed use are anticipated. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The adjoining properties to the north are high density residential; to the south and west are commercial. To the east across a stormwater pond is vacant, commercial land. The proposed quasi commercial residential use appears to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; An amendment to the Community Management Plan would allow the proposed use. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The existing building has both commercial and residential characteristics and its location and design make it compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. 8) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. 9) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; Adhering to the RPUD landscaping requirements will provide for adequate screening. 10) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. 11) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. 12) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; There are minimal natural, scenic features of the site. 13) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The site plan shows minimal measurable light at the ground off site; and 14) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. There is no evidence that the proposed use will have detrimental effects. Page 6 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 0 D. Environmental Considerations, Site Planning & Amenities; Transportation, 14. Landscaping. The preliminary landscaping plan will be evaluated for compliance with the very detailed RPUD landscaping requirements. The preliminary landscape plans (Exhibit A8) indicate 58 trees will be planted within the development area, in a variety of deciduous, coniferous and ornamental species. 15. Parking Lot and driving lane setback. The Ordinance requires a setback of 20 feet for drive lanes and parking areas. The driveway lane around the building, provided emergency access and on site circulation encroached in this setback as close as 8 feet to the side property line. The Council finds that this is acceptable given the size of the building and the proposed use. 16. Building Height. The building height as shown on the plan is 30 feet 1 and '/4 inches, higher than the maximum permitted by ordinance. The final grading plan may impact the defined height of the building. The Council finds allowing up to 32 feet in defined height appropriate given the size and width of the building, the desire to retain a residential style roof structure, and the fact that the building is two stories, fewer than the maximum 3. 17. Hardcover. By virtue of the RPUD zoning, per 78-1701(4)(a) the property is assigned to Hardcover Protection Tier 4, which allows up to 50% hardcover of the gross lot area. The proposed hardcover is 63%, due in part to the complex residential use, and need for onsite circulation. The Council finds flexibility is appropriate given the high intensity uses surround the property (Industrial and Wayzata Blvd to the south, Condominiums and Public Works facility to the North.) If the parcel was not zoned RPUD, there would be no hardcover limitation due to the site distance from lakes. 18. Easements Required. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries will be required. Additional easement or property may be requested by Hennepin County to permit expansion of the stormwater pond east of the site, for Hennepin Council retention and treatment needs. 19. Trail. A trail was envisioned along the south property line, to be constructed by the developer as part of the global Stonebay development. If Hennepin County provides a trail as part of the Wayzata Boulevard project, and requires city easement or financial support, the developer, in lieu of providing a private trail alongside a public trail, will provide the city's share of the financial contribution, not to exceed Page 7 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6796 their expected responsibility to design and construct a private trail. (example: if the private trail is to cost $100,000, and Hennepin County requests city funding of $200,000 for a public trail, the developer will provide $100,000.) 20. 10% Private Park RPUD Requirement. The private recreation area of `10% of the platted property' required under the RPUD standards will be satisfied via the pavilion and the reflective spaces in front of the building, and upper level patio areas. 21. Park and Trail Dedication. There are no identifiable public parkland needs at this location. The Stonebay master plan identified park dedication needs for residential development because development of the proposed housing will generate additional use of existing City park facilities in the area. The Council fords that no park lands need to be dedicated and the park dedication should be in the form of a Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands as allowed by the Municipal Code and as stipulated by the StoneBay Planned Unit Development Agreement. 3,250 per unit = $3,250 x 70 = $227,500.00 22. Stormwater Management. Stormwater management is proposed to be provided by the existing stormwater pond area east of the site. The stormwater facilities will be subject to standard drainage easements. In addition to the City of Orono, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have approval authority over the applicants' stormwater management plan. Final stormwater plans will be subject to the recommendations and approval of the City Engineer. 23. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements & Fees. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee. Recent Council action to revise the Trunk Fee provisions would result in a fee (for development at greater than 4.0 units per acre) of $8,490 per acre (2017 Fee Schedule), based on non -wetland acreage. The fee is estimated at $29,715 ($8,490/ac x 3.5 acres = $29,715.00) 24. The applicant has provided General Concept Plans and Preliminary Plat Drawings attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A-1 through A-17 including: Plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services: Al - Plan Sheet 1 of 10 — Cover Sheet dated 6-19-17 A2 - Plan Sheet 2 of 10 — Survey dated 6-19-17 A3 - Plan Sheet 3 of 10 — Site Plan dated 6-19-17 A4 - Plan Sheet 5 of 10 — Grading Plan dated 076-19-17 Page 8 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b796 A5 - Plan Sheet 6 of 10 — Utility Plan dated 6-19-17 A6 - Plan Sheet 7 of 10 — Civil Details dated 6-19-17 A7 - Plan Sheet 8 of 10 — Civil Details dated 6-19-17 A8 - Plan Sheet 9 of 10 — Landscape Plan dated 6-19-17 A9 - Plan Sheet 10 of 10 — Lighting Plan dated 6-19-17 Plans prepared by Viren Gori, Architect: A 10 — Sheet A 1.0 — Title Sheet AI I — Sheet 2.1 — Site Plan dated 6-15-2017 Al2 — Sheet 3.0 — Landscaping Plan dated 6-15-2017 A 13 — Sheet 3.1 — 1St Floor Plan dated 6-15-2017 A 14 — Sheet 3.2 — 2nd Floor Plan dated 6-15-2017 A 15 — Sheet 3.3 — Roof Plan dated 6-15-2017 A 16 — Sheet 5.0 Elevations — 6-15-2017 Preliminary Plat prepared by Westwood Professional Services A17 - Preliminary Plat, Stonebay Eighth addition Council finds that the plans submitted are generally sufficient to indicate the intent of the developer and the potential impacts of the project. 25 City Engineer Comments. General Development Plans and Final Plat approvals will be reviewed for conformity City standards. 26. The City Council finds that the development of this property must set a high standard for the quality, character, context and compatibility of development desired by the City for high density development in Orono. The Council finds that the proposed comprehensive plan reguiding, rezoning and proposed development of the property for high density senior use is appropriate for the property, will not have negative impacts on the surrounding properties when all Concept Plan Approval conditions are met, and is in keeping with the goals, policies and philosophies of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the Amendment to the Community Management Plan, subject to the written approval of the CMP amendment by the Metropolitan Council. Failure to gain Metropolitan Council approval within the 120 day review period, expiring October 27, 2017 or Page 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. failure to obtain residential density credit for 70 units shall be cause to deny the applications for zone change, Conditional Use Permit, Concept Master Plan and Preliminary Plat. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that upon Met Council approval of the CMP, the General Concept Plan, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat for development of the property at 2635 Kelley Parkway shall be approved, subject to the following declarations and conditions: A. Conditions. 1) Unless noted otherwise, plans shall be consistent with the project outlined in Exhibit A. Developer shall provide a final Master Development Plan for the development that conforms to all standards of the RPUD District except as modified herein, and shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all RPUD standards have been met and shall demonstrate where such standards have not been met, and shall satisfy the City Council that non- compliance with said standards is remedied in a manner acceptable to the Council. 2) Developer shall provide a final landscaping plan meeting all of the requirements of the RPUD District and addressing the elements of Conservation Design to the satisfaction of the City Council. Final landscaping plans will be reviewed for conformity with the RPUD standards. 3) Building footprints and styling shall be generally per the examples included in the attached Exhibit A-13 thru A16. Developer shall make every attempt to ensure that identical dwelling units are not placed side-by-side. 4) Flexibility shall being granted for the building height, hardcover, and drive setback as noted in the Findings section above. 5) Applicant to confirm with SHPO that there are no archaeological sites within the property. 6) Applicant shall dedicate an easement for potential future public trail purposes over the southerly 10 feet of the property; this requirement may be waived pending resolution of the public trail question as part of the Wayzata Boulevard planning process. Page 10 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7) Transportation: a.) Internal site circulation shall be provided as shown on the site plan, provided as Exhibit A3. The new road serving the development shall be platted as two private road outlots as shown on the Preliminary Street & Storm Sewer Plan. The east -west segment of road (Outlot D) shall have a platted corridor width of 40' and a paved width (back of curb to back of curb) of 28'. The north -south segment (Outlot C) shall have a platted corridor width of 50 feet with a 32' paved width. The north -south segment will remain privately owned and maintained until such time that Outlot A is further developed, at which time the City will determine whether the road in Outlot C should be taken over as a public road. b.) A second access drive shall be provided at the east end of the site, to line up with a drive on the north side of Kelley Parkway. 8) Utilities; Stormwater Management a.) Sewer and water mains shall be installed by the Developer per the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A5, subject to the modifications noted in the City Engineer's comments. b.) The City will own and maintain the sanitary sewer and water mains within the development. The City will inspect these systems during their construction to ensure proper installation. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be granted to the City of Orono over all sewer and water main lines and facilities that are not within dedicated public rights-of-way in order to facilitate future system maintenance. c.) The Developer shall install stormwater management facilities generally as shown on the various attached plans. Developer shall provide suitable evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval of the stormwater management plan before Development Plan and Final Plat Approval will be granted. The Developer shall provide sufficient drainage and utility easements as necessary to allow for future City maintenance access for stormwater management facilities. Page 11 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 17�v 9) Grading, Erosion Control a) Erosion control shall adhere to 'Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and to the approved SWPPP. All erosion controls as required by the City and the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencing excavation on the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working order until the site is revegetated. b) The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and vegetation outside of the construction limits area. 10. Plans and Specifications. a) Proposed plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the Final Plan set. The Public Works Department and any other pertinent reviewing agencies shall review and approve all utility improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided and are subject to approval by the Public Works Department and City Engineer. b) Final Street and Storm Sewer Plans. C) Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP showing existing and proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. General Development Plan Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater plans. Preliminary Grading plan is attached as Exhibit A4. d) Final Landscaping Plan with planting schedules including numbers and species, in accordance with the landscaping requirements of the RPUD zoning district, and the recommendations contained within the Conservation Design Master Plan. Preliminary Grading Plan is attached as Exhibit A8. e) Detailed signage and street lighting plans, if any. Page 12 �°moo CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF/THE, CITY COUNCIL G~� 6 N O . 6�ESH6,� f) Any additional plans and specifications deemed necessary by the City as review progresses. 11. Platting Process. Applicant shall complete all requirements for Final Plat Approval as follows. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator 2 weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1). Record plat drawings in the form of two (3) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1 " = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property lines.. B. Naming of plat. 2). Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. D. Signed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of improvements. The City Engineer shall establish the amount to be provided in the Letter of Credit. E. Signed Trail Easement over the southerly 10 feet of the property. 3). Final plat application fee to be paid 12. Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the development. 13. Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The City Engineer shall complete an estimate of improvement costs, including but Page 13 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6786 not limited to public and private streets, curb & gutter, sidewalks, storm sewers, landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, driveways and parking areas, trails, sidewalks, retaining walls and stormwater management facility construction, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of 150% of the improvement costs. 14. Fees required Development of the property is subject to the various fees established within Exhibit M of the PUD No. 4 Agreement, all of which were deferred until a development plan is approved for each of the commercial outlots (Outlots A & D). Below is a summary of the fees, collectible in full at the time of approval of the final plat. These fees will be recalculated at the time of Final Plat: Park Dedication Fee: $3,250/unit x # of units (example: 48 units x $3,250 = $156,000) Sewer Connection Charge: $6,330/acre x 3.5 acres = $22,155.00 Water Connection Charge: $10,480/acre x 3.5 acres = $36,680.00 Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee: Residential > 4 units/acre: $8,490/ac x 3.5 acres = $29,715.00 Note that per the Agreement, the Park Fee is not adjusted for inflation, while the connection charges and Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee are calculated based on the current (2017) Fee Schedule. B. This General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat approval is based upon the known issues that may affect this project, but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. C. This General Concept Plan Approval resolution approves the development concept subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of this resolution and all other requirements of the City. This resolution does not permit construction of the project illustrated in Exhibit A. Such approval shall only be considered when the City Council approves the Master Plan and the Final Plan, after finding that all "Conditions for Development Plan Approval" as identified herein have been met. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28{h day of USS , 2017. Page 14 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. X786 ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 15 Prel0 iminary Plans for Removals, Site, Grading, Utilities & Landscape for Orono Senior Housing 2635 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota Prepored for: Apex Holdings LLC MO Lyndak Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 5540.5 Contact Sanjeev MangaH& Bmail san' Prepared by. :m....�..d.r..e.ar Project number: 0011740.00 RECEIVED JUN 2 0 Z01 i CRY OF ORONO # 3948 948 6786 Resolution Exhibit A 17-3948 Preliminary Plans der R—Wass, she, Qat & u" im t uwbc pe b omen smiar 116u a�aea. as�m�d s.r ar/Ws sl.c rare -- 1 . a>r ASIEYPMCWAi 1. _ MY�--• <�___..v -z__7i - _�'Ci^ _Y�_=!4.! 'fib N[ fE :.� M M la « 1— ewes dh I LEG4L a ►�w Eee r Dewe .� _. a � over a sarnrx ..w• s.....�rr i , I (EP49M AWES r 4N ��vM Yaw w M1r •rrerww tell Yatr o-rulr-O1pMit. M rbva� Yn.-.Ar1. -w e�r M AI M lIY. ` I w wawt MwrIY Ae wwl rbry rr aA (rYr • Ilrn 'aww Y'�r.e"i'riwar rs�r w t...! w..ar w.• nw ..r.w wY Yr � o - ..w ..r nouc I aan frYr • xw a � rl,�,,;,. tet' \ I i � ks rrmnb <rrrr sax cart n lfll ,��`` sw wart n•+w/ 4 w r.s Isr• • ww s fW Yw� � � \ a yM r.4�rr erre o rr /•W .Yav ndrY o rrrYar rrav fve • rw a/ �lSi�w \v J � ! \ I ��usw�nrt rrsrsr •w rY ry .I.�.w..w �ra�� w a�w , av r � C r •rldaNr r>n /� - _ '. t � rI wirvvr rYY wY � � NMS Y�r,�r��sr wMYr i � r. err � M wrI `" � ,'^1 - ... �.. y r � r e. Yrwr r �wtr r,rr ..• .r•w.....mlr r.� rr m,++r wrYe w rr...Y rw. rnw. �. I .:nr.r,l� r.,.,r a:p �. �,r.,�,r Yir �� �� om � r..Y r,.,rAa ftYe • Y.. n ` • a 1 't•, - aY I "\\ -� F M+rf 1l' �\ � a awM w art a YYnaw weer w.swr brat wwr rr .. rs r lura ,o=' ,�o i ,r rt n � j \ ,� �� � «aw�irinai rnn r aia1°a: rr� regia sme .aw m:LE 4 .o arec'.wpiovn !I OMOT D - -t li a wrwr we. rrwrw ww...t r arrrr w. want. arYlEramo�e=av arear d a.rr '.GY o1Y ranfaEs Y aircrwrYrYrc °a �r CERII .A7LIC.W I ir�. - ' .k �! I _ re.a. rwrp sia tYrr ra we+,rwr.r wwY..sr I C� Mir � rr4v.w�r 4 Y. .Vrrs+r.r aY rwa > �t.srrr s� w�raM � Yr ter. Ys+r :�� - - 1 I ♦a'vJ�l iLLlarrrri .r rr. sY..� +•.� o. ' LEGEND we ® orYr M rev Ywwr9 trN I ygp OM451A`OI1 OCKL /LLL 3E �' � $ Ar-nes-i�Ir-rz-act I � _ ' aarYn me m m.Enrorr ter r• s,. # P, - - �',S L - � 'T` n. a net rsYrnr M ntnYre YYrrt . i•'.ara tern trr .. 1f{U r....� �tart rvar - _ ♦r rbM 7111 n I\' ms's. I Q wrp aaw (PJ 1tYrs=mree sa r_r ` rawK aMr woes alar teas Yet ***Alp __._ - -__ -. r - —r �rB•r - ,o tPKB fib` •l. - -I ., en ar 0 aalMSY6 �— s \ - _ - - r •..v .-, - ... - % ` ,M~ NJ LLECY[ tr' lO1r=rrE1T w[ _._ _' _ twos _, nResc rrr amwri RE ,r a _ 1 Yr +[v _ ..xw nrw rErrerw ter •Y-�ht. - w � A ii s, �Z ✓';R^���f' Ty .:' .r. � T r4r; r;.,�'A � , � � iyi � -''� Y..^'G t LLl a.t av v -.�- roa. r.armw Y Q 143h WAYZA�TA BOCI EYA/D off"',4 s" tYYa -r Tnure Ye.rr ` � X Jam'—_— s -.'1 ,T ; Be - :r ,-: ti sarnswe vau aae. wsnt ' - r.r xox rnrear. �� morr vaa e =carat � sYaarre OSY: a rtom ran � � aarL a�.a a• n• �. a. RECEIVED Vull LV LV II CITY OF ORONO — Apm °w 948 m Lp" Asa. Orono Senior Housing or WMIU — 2 w 10 ALTA-NSIPS Land Tide Survey RECEIVED JUN 2 0 ?01, - CATy OF ORONO viestwood WAMTA SCXL NV MEW 04M"W COMOYSTATEAVASOPMAY W — T ...an (Amo Senior Apex Hokfiffs LLC Housing 3948 or WN/v 4 -10 Sive r" - . — OM1 .4'., Mt Or Sibe Developitim-it Smnm-y Site 1ASend General Site Notre pwvpFmw ACA 15z" W, (1s AC) MPa°aVD COMW ja� �M" twmmwp�srmls NUBYc PAABBM: M L*N� 0.rE)ABOB/M RAft AIDAL PIANS SKXK DD= nw M �y WT� Er swwccr, av w/w/2wa BmLvm OBJS SBL AAAJBY roraA5 n�AWA-MM am 2=x PFMgB MFA 55-� S' MIX W" (vx an—) it PAKu&r W f7ASAM Wa� � Ugya� WAD- av "��x cavxbwwft� mo KR- WYE caw� Lma� � w =81 ==LOr ZI, W01 ALL A.N)�AW Mf�M�MMM �.ftm 0BaWOC2 MoRm RECEIVED JUN 2 0 ?01, - CATy OF ORONO viestwood WAMTA SCXL NV MEW 04M"W COMOYSTATEAVASOPMAY W — T ...an (Amo Senior Apex Hokfiffs LLC Housing 3948 or WN/v 4 -10 Sive r" L*N� 0.rE)ABOB/M RAft AIDAL PIANS SKXK DD= sm� ffao a. ALL ctm�nvr"aramv)� KBJ-EYPAWWAY ""'WMM an AM wrim 9eY1. ar W12 IABFss opmax Man ar AE9100w MR =aw arw= SUCH M aimwA= WCESZ � w "am w r =4=2w� � � 1W 0rVPtAC111Wr VEW= 9ftL W APFfMbEV SY � Oxam Fww M �r. *VDEW DEW= WCM CT � aVVW W �NUMC STA� ftmakiwr cvkxs*w stcson w w x ACVCOM¢ WW W Wl AU ACCM M APAKWT FAMMM3 6u= a0NS1AtACIION Pw2v AM Ske Key Notes lix I A a02 C cum MES � ft— ww &RA MICU? &MABj F M" cm aff� �nw G E)SVM COWCMW AAFA (SC tAMs1`AJF PIAN) ----L cavcXw XOdJBAMQ 1 1 f M=� &"K RE JLU[., (Mr �wc� PROPOSED BUILDING 0. P—aw Footpivit - 39,976 sl fWtOKr PAMWW FFE-i 027.0 LAWftW PA. soewor vow 1016.0 R �W&GOAC"�� S FROM= SMASFOONIN L�1 r PAIUO/I U —AIBID eU_ ALL B O 4 rt. M W L9rBFD BY A SAKCAPM ENONSM RECEIVED JUN 2 0 ?01, - CATy OF ORONO viestwood WAMTA SCXL NV MEW 04M"W COMOYSTATEAVASOPMAY W — T ...an (Amo Senior Apex Hokfiffs LLC Housing 3948 or WN/v 4 -10 Sive r" j� ......y LeB-d warnwauewnnmaawwwe6wwneewwnwww CODE Rneagn CASIpII rK / aAa wlN WrNw —� • sANtcrr srFlr c9w 1 »—� sNAw xlu rat-ron.m / � error rw NV (3}Iw�.a1 p2 100 _ .. __ __ -- _ / ► swan oa straw rtm�• e. tnralee - __ sr v-rs' - _ _ _ � • as3e _._ ?<—.-�-_ � / — - _ -�.� MK (•}181131 1 I a•I.IarLA I 31➢ Y SEA _. - _ — 1aFla$m-I i �—I _ - — - RAIN ✓r � _ � - '\ \r � � NV. (II)"/OIS mPllO rAwr IX sA.• In• (3}INAIS • nSA W (•}/e/aT - Na-ro/e.2_ J-._ �� ;- �. 7� Nr / - I B--O— PROPOSEDBUILDING I Footprint = 39,976 s.t • n1I FFE+1017.0 I BSM7+1016.0 snN /I Pao-1o:..w ---_---}---z-- --- AIA (lr}rw�n u U -It' rrK (s}lalaw Saw1 S1FJP - • ns /Ilo•Al�/r I WeStyy rw�r�+r»war 'Aw'-----Aw- iwrrormm vv lr� wrw es[n naso 0r-/m1m NA M}roam I RlO .t rF I N�m•LIN roIX caatmAr NV. 16a.N I 17 Ap m Holdings LLC >d��&.&�� a.�r.A r.�1 sm # 3 9 4 8 d N Ila++ Mar+ ®nog CAnwW Uffi ty Notre Bil a aa001t.o•m � o..r Aasra I. K mlar M 6 .v[t:M.YLr cAaraCa aur M LoanW MOMP OLVA/g1 or lgNC malas AS Saw w aEY BANS war 6YSD w 1EG5'rO5 a' K VAIeOK mMI)Y mrPAIKi AIO LS/CD 1CA9ACCEAIrs rANE/I N M PCLv. M NRIwAi101 9WL Iror L IrEite w AS aFea RAcr w mwr/r. K a3VNACRW 9lAu roar R6•Yn aawnws new ro mllSilllCaw AAD YOiFr M aNla w tNiIEN or NSaoFpANwA S. ALL SW wmm S/WI S[rEA AID qaA lIII/ MSIAW RNS SM•L L PCN W1C M Pte da AIN N ALCMVY NN K awav1r m11ar a iT WW S[6AL'1Aa6 fw IaaF Y.11r AIO 9A14IK IBIALLAAa/ MD SAN/ARr SEAR AIN SIaN 4881 rasrwua••r AS PIIPA09 sr M on FN•EFIrs ASSIpaA613e ar+eeas•rA 1 R w ro LVrS/RCbA M aNNALILR e,ur wrAI1 M I[QSYMYrmOrw• SIAL Aro lR^.A[ /6a06 PRr K IVW� a3N w 1 NN K a w raaanr aur R is -w ww aermw P mm 9 L M NL4a✓9S/IY ff M ma/1G1n1a1 a"" •eLAwg "nw w NN AC OreCiP. l m1rnww S RPrA ro AAM/r x /S.SeS rw f r LOGAw AID wE161a6 6 OaNN1 rS RAW% Mlu'r mato PiZOS et eMP RIC/IaarS Ab RAI'/ 6I1L•Mr UinY maaCaar LNJa' 6 S ALL P w uwn 9NIL L LOrS xv N Amaww/2 NW M cICAaa16 6 K ASR1arwA/E murr mlvwr. K mrlNAcrov 9lwt CLO6M.36 K SRMq: LMP mASwLCila1 NM K ala/IY m1PMEs a OarAPACION 91ML m/AN ALL KOSSMf aT' RAMS !ar mulr QMCCgaIj Ab muNs 9RIL L e9[c6D AIN APPAOIEO BY K an: K an S L MO'FD I6-Ila/6 P/RN ro MaCAAaM K LIN w m/Nr w AMY R i/aC. nf1/FK/w 9WL Itlr OpaIC MAAOC wwt oat caYEC1 iAL - w IInY A w iAP ANY wror YAN wlM SF K an IrA[a RAY NIeA]a'ED ro m m BY K OOY. ••1r AOIERY mCD /ISpENaS L a7lRA® w IeSnLRALa OvePIgICS Q• 4AraS ro K R.wIC AL A L K 1ipOA#//Y L M nWNALw i. mm I IPx6 As 90aI AL ARaawaN IIawNlrw umm ALLo•IpP AMNwA[ PFIr NLw e6U11aC w aoRs w NIa 6rPlrcaYs AL alaaan M AAT aPIMBO s SM1I lar rtorW M NAl•ar LaweNlo er K RF WNFALnIIA w BY LAGa mNNIC 9COCARa6 FlIAIC51Na•aD ro aaI31NCI wmr YArr 9MIL L IAOIdD N wIw Y.W m/6Nrrcrw A Pr11/aX MM WN 1/r•ISr rFsw n Rrr air SIAMAae eea•I M A A aINaN I nrG SP•ARA/ ar N NO[S N 11ErtINm AI ALL Ia1Flf IG1r 0`n.9N6 1 s Wl 3aR w s/nl•r SeClr w m ff SRIIfSS I1PG11Lr off 3' WILL Autw aYL 1.1106S aFIwa SA1W w MM rr. ALL WA S 9lwr a r oral K =toKwrns or K arc /A ALL Mayr UCS 9611L L dCNr MOI NLIRFD M POIFAIrILrE aAS Sr IeM ti 1eWM mN3 P•wK IaYL S1ANlOI ai 11' /801 SANIARY sem SaAI S1F0 1/9AAK NYC1P •W F ILSS alM r.0 tr m1NL IS MSIAANN 9RIL L 8aI srvwa R 90wN t3 w re6rlwEw NN 1 VOLS dr i1Av(S It sANIAer sv nPc W/SCC M NNerle N KWE 9I•L L PrR aka =45 M snu os a�rMsir"MIs , B rownllla�N masa srwt L /rC sotDlAi N/. /a srow srllr nc 9L•L L rot•a/am m/IacN IVI (aA 3 I0a Pec .LWA S w AIro SRaAR aASS J Pm /•L mAlrAlrs rI' Alw tAA01r uA[3S •FlRIa9' aD�) NM A•-1 aAVI/S w INPE SIaaI YI[/I A! F AILOIm aY K M Iarl Slaw P•F 9MLL wrI 1aRararlr/rs a ASA scala PF[ ,volt H aRa a•Ir ALCawMa A ASN etNr IaaWrOpVIi sr PI.W P'w LarJ 1186 NILE Af7 6 APSC Sla•f STIR PK SMwt L SRMIa2 q PK. f1AND aN SY'eiNi 9wuW1 ff L 1117 NM NASI IrMmS • IN'�PAP. ro POSr NerG11w Purrs 9wt R awr r-S,.fa (w raRYllOrn CQN/G ,a.A SGMAa ales AID Orr SIAWNNa YaK ro L CCalVN1a .tl11 NAa- SA 1C YuII roar ro L Aaf6IANL Ica s PPti 0 a 6v9M et K tI¢wrwt Amar s,.rR1 9L•L L alar ea rcvsz (w rwYAtP/ wr) I> AIIIIP mrsalceor 6 Mnnm w RNNAtrw scat nvwar K own Nw Aa AS -61N r LOIp a' VN M WKSINWRa M wt AS-Qar 9Na" lnCAMe AILD IPLIGN R1aAwi w 0"cm M K RMC mlliaA w ro 1lFlY a w OIOI[DI KAEe A NAIL NN PQSr CAW a Rab 6 X RECEIVED JUN 2 0 201 I CITY OF ORONO SF �• •.. 06/19/17 w •6 w n Orono Senor Housing UdWy Phn I • - I --- - - • n1I • I ---_---}---z-- --- I — • • — Ir sacral scar • 0Fl N aN1.ImS,AI 0-0 /al.letS.0 .-- ^'-----..r IX SON ro Am (ai INe.3F Nr. rt}rwasz ACr ►a. �}wola�ae it-Iwtas Nv. M}alnm +. I Nv. (s}rowan I WeStyy rw�r�+r»war 'Aw'-----Aw- iwrrormm vv lr� wrw es[n naso 0r-/m1m NA M}roam I RlO .t rF I N�m•LIN roIX caatmAr NV. 16a.N I 17 Ap m Holdings LLC >d��&.&�� a.�r.A r.�1 sm # 3 9 4 8 d N Ila++ Mar+ ®nog CAnwW Uffi ty Notre Bil a aa001t.o•m � o..r Aasra I. K mlar M 6 .v[t:M.YLr cAaraCa aur M LoanW MOMP OLVA/g1 or lgNC malas AS Saw w aEY BANS war 6YSD w 1EG5'rO5 a' K VAIeOK mMI)Y mrPAIKi AIO LS/CD 1CA9ACCEAIrs rANE/I N M PCLv. M NRIwAi101 9WL Iror L IrEite w AS aFea RAcr w mwr/r. K a3VNACRW 9lAu roar R6•Yn aawnws new ro mllSilllCaw AAD YOiFr M aNla w tNiIEN or NSaoFpANwA S. ALL SW wmm S/WI S[rEA AID qaA lIII/ MSIAW RNS SM•L L PCN W1C M Pte da AIN N ALCMVY NN K awav1r m11ar a iT WW S[6AL'1Aa6 fw IaaF Y.11r AIO 9A14IK IBIALLAAa/ MD SAN/ARr SEAR AIN SIaN 4881 rasrwua••r AS PIIPA09 sr M on FN•EFIrs ASSIpaA613e ar+eeas•rA 1 R w ro LVrS/RCbA M aNNALILR e,ur wrAI1 M I[QSYMYrmOrw• SIAL Aro lR^.A[ /6a06 PRr K IVW� a3N w 1 NN K a w raaanr aur R is -w ww aermw P mm 9 L M NL4a✓9S/IY ff M ma/1G1n1a1 a"" •eLAwg "nw w NN AC OreCiP. l m1rnww S RPrA ro AAM/r x /S.SeS rw f r LOGAw AID wE161a6 6 OaNN1 rS RAW% Mlu'r mato PiZOS et eMP RIC/IaarS Ab RAI'/ 6I1L•Mr UinY maaCaar LNJa' 6 S ALL P w uwn 9NIL L LOrS xv N Amaww/2 NW M cICAaa16 6 K ASR1arwA/E murr mlvwr. K mrlNAcrov 9lwt CLO6M.36 K SRMq: LMP mASwLCila1 NM K ala/IY m1PMEs a OarAPACION 91ML m/AN ALL KOSSMf aT' RAMS !ar mulr QMCCgaIj Ab muNs 9RIL L e9[c6D AIN APPAOIEO BY K an: K an S L MO'FD I6-Ila/6 P/RN ro MaCAAaM K LIN w m/Nr w AMY R i/aC. nf1/FK/w 9WL Itlr OpaIC MAAOC wwt oat caYEC1 iAL - w IInY A w iAP ANY wror YAN wlM SF K an IrA[a RAY NIeA]a'ED ro m m BY K OOY. ••1r AOIERY mCD /ISpENaS L a7lRA® w IeSnLRALa OvePIgICS Q• 4AraS ro K R.wIC AL A L K 1ipOA#//Y L M nWNALw i. mm I IPx6 As 90aI AL ARaawaN IIawNlrw umm ALLo•IpP AMNwA[ PFIr NLw e6U11aC w aoRs w NIa 6rPlrcaYs AL alaaan M AAT aPIMBO s SM1I lar rtorW M NAl•ar LaweNlo er K RF WNFALnIIA w BY LAGa mNNIC 9COCARa6 FlIAIC51Na•aD ro aaI31NCI wmr YArr 9MIL L IAOIdD N wIw Y.W m/6Nrrcrw A Pr11/aX MM WN 1/r•ISr rFsw n Rrr air SIAMAae eea•I M A A aINaN I nrG SP•ARA/ ar N NO[S N 11ErtINm AI ALL Ia1Flf IG1r 0`n.9N6 1 s Wl 3aR w s/nl•r SeClr w m ff SRIIfSS I1PG11Lr off 3' WILL Autw aYL 1.1106S aFIwa SA1W w MM rr. ALL WA S 9lwr a r oral K =toKwrns or K arc /A ALL Mayr UCS 9611L L dCNr MOI NLIRFD M POIFAIrILrE aAS Sr IeM ti 1eWM mN3 P•wK IaYL S1ANlOI ai 11' /801 SANIARY sem SaAI S1F0 1/9AAK NYC1P •W F ILSS alM r.0 tr m1NL IS MSIAANN 9RIL L 8aI srvwa R 90wN t3 w re6rlwEw NN 1 VOLS dr i1Av(S It sANIAer sv nPc W/SCC M NNerle N KWE 9I•L L PrR aka =45 M snu os a�rMsir"MIs , B rownllla�N masa srwt L /rC sotDlAi N/. /a srow srllr nc 9L•L L rot•a/am m/IacN IVI (aA 3 I0a Pec .LWA S w AIro SRaAR aASS J Pm /•L mAlrAlrs rI' Alw tAA01r uA[3S •FlRIa9' aD�) NM A•-1 aAVI/S w INPE SIaaI YI[/I A! F AILOIm aY K M Iarl Slaw P•F 9MLL wrI 1aRararlr/rs a ASA scala PF[ ,volt H aRa a•Ir ALCawMa A ASN etNr IaaWrOpVIi sr PI.W P'w LarJ 1186 NILE Af7 6 APSC Sla•f STIR PK SMwt L SRMIa2 q PK. f1AND aN SY'eiNi 9wuW1 ff L 1117 NM NASI IrMmS • IN'�PAP. ro POSr NerG11w Purrs 9wt R awr r-S,.fa (w raRYllOrn CQN/G ,a.A SGMAa ales AID Orr SIAWNNa YaK ro L CCalVN1a .tl11 NAa- SA 1C YuII roar ro L Aaf6IANL Ica s PPti 0 a 6v9M et K tI¢wrwt Amar s,.rR1 9L•L L alar ea rcvsz (w rwYAtP/ wr) I> AIIIIP mrsalceor 6 Mnnm w RNNAtrw scat nvwar K own Nw Aa AS -61N r LOIp a' VN M WKSINWRa M wt AS-Qar 9Na" lnCAMe AILD IPLIGN R1aAwi w 0"cm M K RMC mlliaA w ro 1lFlY a w OIOI[DI KAEe A NAIL NN PQSr CAW a Rab 6 X RECEIVED JUN 2 0 201 I CITY OF ORONO SF �• •.. 06/19/17 w •6 w n Orono Senor Housing UdWy Phn I • - I --- - - -- T-- - - • I ---_---}---z-- --- I — I WeStyy rw�r�+r»war 'Aw'-----Aw- iwrrormm vv lr� wrw es[n naso 0r-/m1m NA M}roam I RlO .t rF I N�m•LIN roIX caatmAr NV. 16a.N I 17 Ap m Holdings LLC >d��&.&�� a.�r.A r.�1 sm # 3 9 4 8 d N Ila++ Mar+ ®nog CAnwW Uffi ty Notre Bil a aa001t.o•m � o..r Aasra I. K mlar M 6 .v[t:M.YLr cAaraCa aur M LoanW MOMP OLVA/g1 or lgNC malas AS Saw w aEY BANS war 6YSD w 1EG5'rO5 a' K VAIeOK mMI)Y mrPAIKi AIO LS/CD 1CA9ACCEAIrs rANE/I N M PCLv. M NRIwAi101 9WL Iror L IrEite w AS aFea RAcr w mwr/r. K a3VNACRW 9lAu roar R6•Yn aawnws new ro mllSilllCaw AAD YOiFr M aNla w tNiIEN or NSaoFpANwA S. ALL SW wmm S/WI S[rEA AID qaA lIII/ MSIAW RNS SM•L L PCN W1C M Pte da AIN N ALCMVY NN K awav1r m11ar a iT WW S[6AL'1Aa6 fw IaaF Y.11r AIO 9A14IK IBIALLAAa/ MD SAN/ARr SEAR AIN SIaN 4881 rasrwua••r AS PIIPA09 sr M on FN•EFIrs ASSIpaA613e ar+eeas•rA 1 R w ro LVrS/RCbA M aNNALILR e,ur wrAI1 M I[QSYMYrmOrw• SIAL Aro lR^.A[ /6a06 PRr K IVW� a3N w 1 NN K a w raaanr aur R is -w ww aermw P mm 9 L M NL4a✓9S/IY ff M ma/1G1n1a1 a"" •eLAwg "nw w NN AC OreCiP. l m1rnww S RPrA ro AAM/r x /S.SeS rw f r LOGAw AID wE161a6 6 OaNN1 rS RAW% Mlu'r mato PiZOS et eMP RIC/IaarS Ab RAI'/ 6I1L•Mr UinY maaCaar LNJa' 6 S ALL P w uwn 9NIL L LOrS xv N Amaww/2 NW M cICAaa16 6 K ASR1arwA/E murr mlvwr. K mrlNAcrov 9lwt CLO6M.36 K SRMq: LMP mASwLCila1 NM K ala/IY m1PMEs a OarAPACION 91ML m/AN ALL KOSSMf aT' RAMS !ar mulr QMCCgaIj Ab muNs 9RIL L e9[c6D AIN APPAOIEO BY K an: K an S L MO'FD I6-Ila/6 P/RN ro MaCAAaM K LIN w m/Nr w AMY R i/aC. nf1/FK/w 9WL Itlr OpaIC MAAOC wwt oat caYEC1 iAL - w IInY A w iAP ANY wror YAN wlM SF K an IrA[a RAY NIeA]a'ED ro m m BY K OOY. ••1r AOIERY mCD /ISpENaS L a7lRA® w IeSnLRALa OvePIgICS Q• 4AraS ro K R.wIC AL A L K 1ipOA#//Y L M nWNALw i. mm I IPx6 As 90aI AL ARaawaN IIawNlrw umm ALLo•IpP AMNwA[ PFIr NLw e6U11aC w aoRs w NIa 6rPlrcaYs AL alaaan M AAT aPIMBO s SM1I lar rtorW M NAl•ar LaweNlo er K RF WNFALnIIA w BY LAGa mNNIC 9COCARa6 FlIAIC51Na•aD ro aaI31NCI wmr YArr 9MIL L IAOIdD N wIw Y.W m/6Nrrcrw A Pr11/aX MM WN 1/r•ISr rFsw n Rrr air SIAMAae eea•I M A A aINaN I nrG SP•ARA/ ar N NO[S N 11ErtINm AI ALL Ia1Flf IG1r 0`n.9N6 1 s Wl 3aR w s/nl•r SeClr w m ff SRIIfSS I1PG11Lr off 3' WILL Autw aYL 1.1106S aFIwa SA1W w MM rr. ALL WA S 9lwr a r oral K =toKwrns or K arc /A ALL Mayr UCS 9611L L dCNr MOI NLIRFD M POIFAIrILrE aAS Sr IeM ti 1eWM mN3 P•wK IaYL S1ANlOI ai 11' /801 SANIARY sem SaAI S1F0 1/9AAK NYC1P •W F ILSS alM r.0 tr m1NL IS MSIAANN 9RIL L 8aI srvwa R 90wN t3 w re6rlwEw NN 1 VOLS dr i1Av(S It sANIAer sv nPc W/SCC M NNerle N KWE 9I•L L PrR aka =45 M snu os a�rMsir"MIs , B rownllla�N masa srwt L /rC sotDlAi N/. /a srow srllr nc 9L•L L rot•a/am m/IacN IVI (aA 3 I0a Pec .LWA S w AIro SRaAR aASS J Pm /•L mAlrAlrs rI' Alw tAA01r uA[3S •FlRIa9' aD�) NM A•-1 aAVI/S w INPE SIaaI YI[/I A! F AILOIm aY K M Iarl Slaw P•F 9MLL wrI 1aRararlr/rs a ASA scala PF[ ,volt H aRa a•Ir ALCawMa A ASN etNr IaaWrOpVIi sr PI.W P'w LarJ 1186 NILE Af7 6 APSC Sla•f STIR PK SMwt L SRMIa2 q PK. f1AND aN SY'eiNi 9wuW1 ff L 1117 NM NASI IrMmS • IN'�PAP. ro POSr NerG11w Purrs 9wt R awr r-S,.fa (w raRYllOrn CQN/G ,a.A SGMAa ales AID Orr SIAWNNa YaK ro L CCalVN1a .tl11 NAa- SA 1C YuII roar ro L Aaf6IANL Ica s PPti 0 a 6v9M et K tI¢wrwt Amar s,.rR1 9L•L L alar ea rcvsz (w rwYAtP/ wr) I> AIIIIP mrsalceor 6 Mnnm w RNNAtrw scat nvwar K own Nw Aa AS -61N r LOIp a' VN M WKSINWRa M wt AS-Qar 9Na" lnCAMe AILD IPLIGN R1aAwi w 0"cm M K RMC mlliaA w ro 1lFlY a w OIOI[DI KAEe A NAIL NN PQSr CAW a Rab 6 X RECEIVED JUN 2 0 201 I CITY OF ORONO SF �• •.. 06/19/17 w •6 w n Orono Senor Housing UdWy Phn MI oil 1-17M . M EEO C,7 22 if 14.1 999 iqw i PT i"'I ORN 0 filti l, ylii�, iC 11 R.9111.1,HP! t 1 M I Ed MI oil N— S -- V -a rec„�"z— FL SLi 101L. Mw- 2xM9N.A.A MTAWf OV.XXE AWN SMWE JWAW —7— '- MOIL. - ffi-j, �1- A— r—Mr T xl=lz :I nn Em#zi w. t77 RECEIVED JUN 20 2017 enso CITY OF ORONO -Wo/V — a v 10 Owno Senior Westwood Apex Holdings UC JW lfdWk an Deb& Homing A B..h 3 9 4 8 8 ir9�� dEy � R @E a8 = 6r 6 ! Big N NM QQ ��"ya4gCi Ng! a ip�a0`1 g�� l 1- g5g�y l ( gg E„ E Cgaa�yg�@fpe!tl�ye¢ a§- g`ii 1tl�yy yYi. �� fi t HgIII igHE1! 111 I Fp giga$ t oil " ;r "I a MIR 01 01 j psi Valli d�4$$T R E @ �j •� d c ((jfjj gg g t € I�� � ea 488Np�i �a� ag�Y� �i 3rQYYYfR$ a€$ E y $6p 4e R��p.Bl�p Ili "'ROM I 2ill, pR�pq��if Oil ¢d$ 51 A y4 ONO" X 114 HiNg 41 wa V i r t 'I e i �..j/ r r i i I ' S �• r I t I N+ ------------------------- ED ------ I wof" g SSS666 i I � iI , —�9 --------------------------------- 6 811 a ed81l. RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO ;eaai�onmlw»• rw.tr�`i+lsl'.w' I'I� 1 I.J A Lm„n »n um..00u ma s »u nal onP,Yll •. ar cr r xrs.r w. -x o.• MIX.— ............. , . »»,� t w...m Q Westwood = Appy Holdings LLC >s�,.... Kam 3 9 �4 8 �^ .r✓wv Ir,l.—__.. - ----- sea..r.Bwl M�,rk,ers+e she 6'r — le.lesnahlswuyrrer �S 1 - y t � r 1. COURAC1pB ro OOONMIITE fM OTQ rraa�rli 2 4ERY PMgIG lDr UGIT LOC�TOIIS PROR ro NSTNUIgrI a tnrlso enrol ro a sno 11c EIC st sena. wslc/mwr urarl s saoune ro � cresol sa0. rsla o e[ wrlxca. s. Parc roar IassxB ro Asa uorr nsnne ru. a •r arr kc. rxalMlc maB �, 111! IYrns Ma.. rb.s1 oseas W '.lSIZO .r> D7 -awe 1anwlrwscw All. PIlCPOIgD UCi1T FO[RNES /q� Fuir �� Orono Senior Housing rr. �� �. ]� O► LI I rf=a'"i; r'1 PROPOSED BUILDINGJ. • !! + Y Y ' FaoQxint =39,978 s.f. • I FFE-10270 J 1 BSMT=1018.0 1 � 7 T 1 4 1 fLlX - . . ... . .. . .. . .. Westwood = Appy Holdings LLC >s�,.... Kam 3 9 �4 8 �^ .r✓wv Ir,l.—__.. - ----- sea..r.Bwl M�,rk,ers+e she 6'r — le.lesnahlswuyrrer �S 1 - y t � r 1. COURAC1pB ro OOONMIITE fM OTQ rraa�rli 2 4ERY PMgIG lDr UGIT LOC�TOIIS PROR ro NSTNUIgrI a tnrlso enrol ro a sno 11c EIC st sena. wslc/mwr urarl s saoune ro � cresol sa0. rsla o e[ wrlxca. s. Parc roar IassxB ro Asa uorr nsnne ru. a •r arr kc. rxalMlc maB �, 111! IYrns Ma.. rb.s1 oseas W '.lSIZO .r> D7 -awe 1anwlrwscw All. PIlCPOIgD UCi1T FO[RNES /q� Fuir �� Orono Senior Housing rr. �� �. ]� O► LI I rf=a'"i; r'1 6786 ORONO SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITY, SDESIGNG PACKAGE ORONO, MINNESOTA 0. .. I ,r::..t: �"•`, '�_.._ – - —.�_ -aE—Fes-:-�.. _—_ O i Senior HousingCommunity, Orono, Minnesota Rl a ASSOCIATES .�a W.�....r....._�.. Ar pp.....� RECEIVED a., JUN 2 0 2017. A 1.0 ^W [CTR 20,E-0- 3948 CITY OF ORONO `;U m z n a o m 13 m v ADJACENT SI TF. ZONED B6—PUD UUTLOT O: EMSDNO RETENTION POND Orono Senior Housing `' Community D CO �, :4. Orono, Minnesota �� 6786 SCHEMATIC DESIGN � PACKAGE -------------.— -- 06/ts/n H \ < >o4y�Z4 '!e.. ;• .. �``-• • ''I�..— I 21 39 I Ia 27 12e I 25 �i :s Z] ]] I Asa cn r�<ti. f I I I C ( � - 39 55'A.ES 4' t 7 �• \ I 1 G I O — E `2 ]3 3a ]5 � � M � I STOR,CE �--� 00 r ]ip Of *eUCr "�o;g. InI p �°• I O \ to G+ -- - - ----- ----- eF,.] -------------- _--- '---------------- EJ> ---- — — — —— x�• :j� t5 j1 SFR � Amh1i -------------------------------------- ..-- RECEIVED [1 1� 48R JUN 202011 # 39�A'30 6786 SCHEMAPC DESIGN PACKAGE 06/15/17 - � aavhiem: -N'v'�vo _ I IOwner. ,1.114?^:4 �,' di�i.,,. �1..✓ 4 � � ✓.. ./� • � •7y. I � 7 � 111 I Xh�_T _ �_� Htf•f -- V..r I n.._ � C �I 1 — � 9fCN - I f' II BFT+ I L� I L•• 0 �asc �Y— �" �— M. E g ° � �f. �, � ,a a .,, : a `o � ^ I •� E � :r �a v) 0 o �.rrs w . i�-••m cv�c � ernes, e I,� `�. \l� ` � �I 0 2 r . �\--- --._._---_---------------------------——.—————————.--—————————-- — — — — —— ------ —�_ An;hasq: �' I mw•wsaaw+as wm.mm...« iw p,vl DliS)Y f•rr..•m .+.. m��Wa✓s Mrm[ywfammw.mn RECEIVED A3. JUN 2 0 2011 # 3948 A 3.11 =no�mr r zcn-r CITY OF ORONO V co F W r 6PSBUUIW OUO1Q N ,. Nva g � BuIsnOH JOIuag ouoJp aX �� 9 47 - -------- it a — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -------------------------------- 6786 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PACKAGE 06/15/17 --------------------------------- ROSIME-5 ------------- JUN 2 0 2011 CITY OF ORONO # 3 wwa.amcu.cs amnxa]z A 3.3 MCT . 30I7-0' 6780 sCHEMAnC DESIGN PACKAGE a- 06/13/t7 _ 'I 4 "€ ------ NORTr E_EVA7'C%n am..n �11 E Owner: �•.. 'gni E_EVATION C Pill J,! 11HIM :s e b .. . y IsE :A 0 b 0 V arm -- C S---1 ELE`k"O'i � RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2011 Al CITY OFORONO wnt`r" �w x �.r. = #3948 ...... sT E�-vAT:cv ;.,,fir A 5.0 , .»._,• 6786 __j S TONEBA Y EIGHTH ADDITION I CA. DOM . �.0 /®s w •ewes r M x.lwa. ue . nwr r•q r�.•r. r r r r rrw•r r.rr r+•ba+.rr .. .� Ki::,, - n.r ��uw .. �..wrwlrbr�wr �rs�.rma/arorrrrr. rr.rrrrre r.rr�rre.,r �.. •.b�r•r/W trlN�an,rb br•r•/bbrrr rla lb_4r D.. � 8 ELOCK 1 1 I � �s�oaw 1 I A 1 �r.,Y•.__ tw4 rr 1 Lor 1 r , - a I .s rr •..,awe w/r.�/rrbr rr rarre•r 4.aiiria� r�r ��"../rr �rw rr�.�. \/ 1-ar h� 1 ,� ✓ ,y ..r rrr �r� ��rr ay. a.rrrrrw►..arrww.r •r rr.r rrc rra.r w... 1 I � 1 � Wei. faqir 1 1 I 1 1 1 woe I I 1 armor aa.�r as r 2AF ________________________ 1 ar n••o.�.., /•. ora _____—___�----------------------- ,.rrr .. .� �va® s WAMs. 'rte+ r.r g nl.,nn,n Cvvi.�vr„njv .��:�i •• • /a� is v. i �% az rs�A1WY6w�,ampar awwl rl bway a•rrr..rra•r•rwn r.rr rr/WY �r+Wws•w rY.�+m �rz •b r.rr•r... a.�,y/rr err OI4R s Yr•4 aor 1:1 I /r +s..sY r.�►�rwr->_. r. r•r/rr rr. rrr. rrr_b r a ayr a•y rr ay s rwwraarasIr r rr••/bla�ala'�'rot _ � �bea.1 �Y/r�tlr �.+•N�4r • r ,w..•s b u za>r.� ~ • rer M ,•ea•M/ bur sl/ r,aa/ r •ls� ar r. rt a.b a.r/r b /�� r�.r .�r 'rr a�rarraesrar,�+rw rrrr_•ar u RECEIVED • p abr na.r a.yar.w n �" sr. w rl JUN 2 0 2017 Westwood OW Gr- QRGNG 30),A ne►.rrrs.a.kwo __j October 26, 2017 Mr. Jeremy Barnhart City of Orono 2705 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RECEIVED NOV 1 "2017 CITY 0 RE: Orono Senior Housing Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Administrative Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20637-8 Metropolitan Council District 3 Dear Mr. Barnhart: The Metropolitan Council received the City's Orono Senior Housing plan amendment on October 11, 2017. The amendment reguides 3.5 acres from Office to High Density Residential located north of County Road 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) and south of Kelley Parkway. The purpose of the amendment is to support the development of a 70 -unit senior housing project. Council staff finds the amendment meets the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Review Guidelines adopted by the Council on July 28, 2010. The proposed amendment does not affect official forecasts or the City's ability to accommodate its share of the region's affordable housing need. Therefore, the Council will waive further review and action; and the City may place this amendment into effect. However, staff offers the following advisory comments for your consideration: Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) Several additional proposed subdivisions, not requiring plan amendment, could add an additional 200 housing units. These additions of housing could boost households and population in Orono beyond the 2020 forecast. No I -s-` -' - ^ e4aoa +-+h- .;._ +„r rb amPnrl hent -- but maybe needed if additional _ pre -2020 housing projects are initiated. Please be in touch with your Sector Representative about the appropriate forecasts to use in your 2040 comprehensive plan. Housing (Jonathan Stanley Todd Graham, 651-602-1555) The City should be aware that its share of the region's 2021-2030 need for affordable housing is 154 units. In preparing the 2040 comprehensive plan update, the City should note that the minimum density of land guided to address this need is 8 units per acre. The City is encouraged to contact their Sector Representative or Council housing staff with any questions regarding the Council's housing policy for the 2040 comprehensive plan update. 00i METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C L Mr. Jeremy Barnhart, City of Orono October 26, 2017 Page 2 The amendment, explanatory materials, and the information submission form will be appended to the City's Plan in the Council's files. If you have any questions please contact Patrick Boylan, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1438. jgjs,Manager Assistance CC: Steve O'Brien, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Jennifer Munt, Metropolitan Council District 3 Freya Thamman, Sector Representative Patrick Boylan, Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator N: ICommDevILPAICommunitieslOronolLetterslOrono 2017 Orono Senior Housing CPA 20637-8 Admin Review. docx Q) � / \/L_L_L_L_ l/ ir� AIi �)r vV l/ Found Capped Iron Pipe i inscribed License No. 41842 S TONEBA Y EIGHTH A DDI TION r- Found Capped Iron Pipe \ i inscribed License No. 41842 i LO N IA//I \/-7A -T- /I V V/—I l L_/ -I l/ -I • - W i v r VVG.T.7 n i i I F- i i /I I�) F) L _ L_ v /-� l \ Ll 40 0 40 80 120 Scale in feet I A/F-^T VVL_\" l /view° l lI/'�l IIA//I \/ F71lJc7 V V/ -I I �- Found Capped Iron Pipe inscribed License No. 41842 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Apex Holdings, LLC, a limited liability corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Ou tlo t D, STONEBAY Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as STONEBAY EIGHTH ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said ----------- has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of 20 OWNER'S NAME By By Name, Title Name, Title STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of -------- ° f ----------- °------------- on behalf of the --------- (Signature) Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota 20 , by ------- (Name Printed) and I Craig W. Morse do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that l am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat, and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of 20 Craig W. Morse, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 23021 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ,- Found Capped Iron Pipe This instrument was acknowledged before me on this i inscribed License No. 41842 day of . 20 , by Craig W. Morse. (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires A / , ,� N ORONO, MINNESOTA I v L/. i L i This plat of STONEBAY EIGHTH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of . 20 if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA By By The south line of Outlot D, STONEBAY is assumed to bear N890 05' 10"W. O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron rebor set and marked by License No. 23021. • Denotes iron monument found and marked as shown. Mayor Manager RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of 20 Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By day of 1 20 COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of STONEBAY EIGHTH ADDITION recorded in this office this day of at o'clock M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder By Deputy 20 2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Fi for Removals, Site, Grading, Utilities & Landscape for Orono Senior Housing 2635 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota Prepared for: Apex Holdings LLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Contact: Sanjeev Mangalick Email: sanjeevmanaglick@comcast.net Prepared by: Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project number: 0011740.00 Contact: Ryan M. Bluhm Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 ALTA—NSPS Land Title Survey 3 Removals Plan 4 Site Plan 5 Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 6 Utility Plan 7 Civil Details 8 Civil Details g Tree Inventory 10 Landscape Plan 11 Landscape Plan 12 SWPPP Narrative i13 SWPPP Notes NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS Final Development Plans for Removals, Site, Grading, Utilities & Landscape for Orono Senior Orono, Minnesota Housing Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 1 of 13 0011740CVP01.d c2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. IIN V S I �. i , sro — SAN 2.1 /NCIH-� �-1021.13 RIM �! 1009.83 INV. E- W SAN Ti �- sAN TWA T PVA r 1020.56 R! 1013.69 INV N 1012 91 /NV E /-8 /NCH SAN WA / 12 INCH —WAr -1024 5 T X2230 /INCH X02 �1 sro a ° A1000n-PW *1 1" azo zc- a 10e8 , / tio2 _� 1026CD / Q —1025 1024 � -� -1023.74 RIM ��m i 1012.74 /NV.NV E- w KELLEY PARKWA , �3 � \ � 0 � 1 .. — i � � v — — -1022.92 RIM m sAN _ cD m r 1014.89 INV. W -S_- \ ` -war war war WA T----_ 1025 j I SWAT i n �-1021.58 RIM 1 wAT 1A__ 1012.02 INV N -S ` l i a a a ° _ _ sro s _ 2s a26o5, ! ¢ R,Sj Do � CU CD 5 �--FOUND - -FO 5P s R INAGE AND UTILITY 3 U CA PEsTo L774102+2 \ AS ME S PER X02 LS #41842 1 `/.55 FEET TH ANL F T N AY EM #5 .38 FEET NORTHAy — \ OS FE ST OF oN AND .06 FEET WEST / 110 \ Q/ 10 I I COMPO E T ` 1022 OF COMPUTED POINT --1021.76 R4M ° 0�- �A jO� j 1010.12 / V E- W �� / q 1020.16 RIM \ J 1 1011 '471NV N \ sro i 1 .03 INV W- SE 1020 .. \ 1-00, J zo W "� / FOUND CAPPED ON ---" cL LS #41842 1025 I � / / .21 FEET NORT I 0 \ qr Y z I I AND .18 FEET EA T I \ 1p20 � oN 10 1022 / OF COMPUTED P INT o / ca n I '00000 t I 10 6 LO J / I 1019\ \ OI I J 1023 15 - oo 1025 NOIT�UILDINGS (b OBJECT PROP RT 101 o J% iIo I ` B C W J l C 10109,24 V, 1 N I Z L6 o~ �/ / l� 30 /NL�`- 1o�4 (O n/ r 1 I A 1 O I'��� �' 11_�h I co 10 N 3 I o ,• , N- ��, 102 O � 4 I �, l l 0 10 _ 1025 -1 ;, "0000,�_ cLLJJ n/ /7 l l r v/ co 1/ Iplo1 ✓ D In O C N , o Q0 DAHLSTRO .// , 9`0 WCD (I o!a D VEL OP fNT LLC CC o —23-12-0062 WATr�RI�INE�ESORM SEWER ��'� _ I I T/ nT APPEAR TO BE OUTSIDE OF 7 co 8 V / _ U / 51 I (` D INAGE & UTl ITY ASEMENTS -�\ --- ! o I o \ 10 I 1 ) 1 / -� t - Ip A TERLI E ON /NUES S U 09 " DRAINAGE AND UTILITY - ` �� �� ER ITY ARSB L I 030 ® EA SEMEN IS PER PL A T �1 1024.OF STONFo 4 Y I TEM #5 1 f?ri4A-�L - - _ - � � 2, N ' sro 1012.43 /NV E ` ----- ---i---"z------------------------ �----- -------- --as. ro `* i 1012.14 /NV W \ i --------- - - - ----- pro ----- - ��-- j�= - 1 9.4_4N1� sro sro sr x-30 INCH / sro \ \ 1027 i o sr 102 - -70 sro co 01 p�� Q o 1� D CA ED \g �� - _ - " \. �S / o 36 FtETLS 2 OR -� \ ....... �� X- -1 2 95 RlM 1023 _ x x x x x x 1 0965 INV (�2 AND .17 F TWE cos G o A GAS x N OF COMPO ED POIN l LOIS- GA GAS 1025— POH i POH 'OH �POH POH GAS GA i POH POH GAS POH GA �- D j i� 10� S8900581 RE 9 H 0 POH POH IO POH POH p OUN , 1 /2 / CH OPEN g _ .4 FEET SOUTH A D �_- EN NTA 1 20 .49 FEET EAST OF i STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. \ J UTED POINT v 112, PLAT 9R ITFM 7 i 1023`- 1022-\ 1021 ` -1025 ---1024 - _ -`. 102,3- 026 023026 g ' i i ir-n In lr-�r�ln l inn � �n i—� � ;-TA Tr- Air, � A YZA TA BOULEVARD WEST (HENNEPIN COUNTY STA TE AID HIGHWA Y 112) - i - i rO25 � 102n 1023 - 1023 (7, 1022 -1020 1019 I 1018 Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Crew. fiw ciudea: RIH Drawn: TJD Record Drawing by/date: Prepared for: K Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION Common Ground Alliance Outlot D, Stonebay, Hennepin County, Minnesota GENERAL NOTES 1. This survey was prepared using American Land Title Association, Policy Number 0-9301-003042632, File Number MT14-70005-R having on effective date of January 31, 2014 at 2. -PM. 2. The address of the surveyed property is 2635 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356. (Table A Item 2) J. Subject property appears to be classified as Zone A when scaled from Flood Insurance Rate Map Community - Panel Number 27053C 0302F dated November 4, 2016. (Table A Item 3) 4. Subject property contains 152,3981 Sq.Ft. or 3.50f acres. (Table A Item 4) 5. No Zoning information provided by the client. (Table A Item 6 (a)) 6. Subject property contains 0 total parking stalls, including 0 handicapped stalls. (Table A Item 9) 7. The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. (State One Call Ticket No. 1 70 79 0 783). (Table A Item 11) 8. Bearings are based on Hennepin County Coordinates. Elevations shown hereon are based on NAV988. The following notes correspond to the numbering system of Schedule B of American Land Title Association, Policy Number 0-9301-003042632, File Number MT14-70005-R . 5. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat. AS SHOWN ON SURVEY. 6. Declaration of Easements, Restrictions and Covenants as shown in Document No. 8406752 and Declaration as shown in Document No. 8406755. 8406752 BLANKET DESCRIP77ON NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY. 8406755 REFERS TO PROPERTY LOTS 27-45, BLOCK, LOTS 1-9, BLOCK 2 AND OU7LOT G, STONEBAY, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, NOT SUBJECT PROPERTY NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY. Master Declaration as shown in Document No. 8406753, with Declarant Rights transferred by Document No. 8690577. 8406753 BLANKET DESCRIP71ON NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY. 8690577 DOES NOT REFER TO SUBJECT PROPERTY, NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY. All Declarant Rights subsequently transferred by Document No. 9440875. BLANKET DESCRIP77ON NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY. 7. Highway Plat for Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 112 as shown in Document No. 10021115. AS SHOWN ON SURVEY. CERTIFICATION To Apex Holdings LLC, Stewart Title Guaranty Company and American Land Title Association: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a) (b), 7(a), 8, 9, 11 and 13 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on March 24, 2017 Date of Plat or Map: 4/03/2017 Robert L. Houle Minnesota License No. 43999 Bob.Houle@westwoodps.com LEGEND Date IO SANITARY MANHOLE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX co SEWER CLEANOUT OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE 5T STORM MANHOLE Tv CABLE TV BOX ® CATCH BASIN ® TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN HAND HOLE ® FLARED END SECTION TRAFFIC LIGHT r0-' POWER POLE STREET LITE GUY WIRE BUSH/SHRUB ❑E ELECTRIC BOX CONIFEROUS TREE • E ELECTRIC METER DECIDUOUS TREE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WETLAND >< GA TE VALVE -Cry CABLE TV HYDRANT -GAS- GAS LINE W WATER METER -POH- POWER OVERHEAD CURB STOP BOX -PUG- POWER UNDERGROUND �W WATER MANHOLE -SAN- SANITARY SEWER Ow WELL _ST0- STORM SEWER GAS METER -TOH— TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ® STEEL/WOOD POST TUG TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND -� SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER _WA T- WATERMAIN tea- SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER -FOP- FIBER OPTIC FMAILI MAIL BOX x FENCE LINE HANDICAPPED STALL CURB & GUTTER G PERC TEST ACCESS CONTROL Mw MONITORING WELL GAS VALVE FIRE HOSE CONNECTION a° CONCRETE SURFACE ® CULVERT BITUMINOUS SURFACE FLOOD LIGHT GRA VEL SURFACE O SOIL BORING Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota O Denotes Iron Monument Set • Denotes Iron Monument Found ODenotes Cast Iron Monument Found Vicinity Map Not to Scale 0' 30' 60' 90' 0011740ATF01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 sheet•. 2 of 13 ALTA-NSPS Land Title Survey C)2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (=) Sign Legend REFERENCE S.1 STOP SIGN S.2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE S.3 DO NOT ENTER S.4 BEGIN ONE WAY .-o. Site Development Summary SIZE MnDOT DESIGNATION PROPERTY AREA: 152,398 SF (3.5 AC) PROPOSED PARKING: 30" X 30" R1-1 EXISTING ZONING: RR -113 PUD UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS 39 12" X 18" R7 -8M PROPOSED ZONING: RPUD SURFACE PARKING STALLS 46 (4 ADA) TOTAL 85 30" X 30" R5-1 BUILDING GROSS SIZE: 39,976 SF 24" X 30" R6—X1 FLOOR—AREA—RATIO: 0.52 BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORIES (31'-1") PERVIOUS AREA: 56,933 SF (1.31 AC) 37.36% IMPERVIOUS AREA: 95,465 SF (2.19 AC) 62.64% X g — I �" X o Site Legend EXISTING TOTAL UNITS: 70 UNITS (SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS) 0 VQ r, v KELLEY PARKWA Y AT ra _ � I G` \ \ F \ — — — — 10' EASEMENT S.1 \ _ 20' PAR ING SET AC — — R412' _ _ / / \ 24' a \ _ — \35' BUILDING SETBACK4 R20'-:� C 45.98-' R388 --R15' ilk U X X X X X X X XIX—X POH GAS GAS POH POH POH POH POH rE)POH GAS POH GAS GA POH POH POH POH Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. M WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST (HENNEP/N COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 112) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revisions. direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota 08/07/17 — City Comments 03/20/18 — Final Development Approval Plans %R11L Ryan K Bluhm Date 03/20/18 License No. 41257 pestped; PUB Checked: RMB Drawn: Sn Record Drawing by/&ft Prepared for: PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE CURB AND GUTTER FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST I \ � I � _ \I 7� — GAS POH POH —mom X X X Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 General Site Notes Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT OBTAINED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ON 06/02/2016. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MUTCD CONSTRUCTION PHASED TRAFFIC CONTROL AS REQUIRED TO PROTECT WORKMEN AND THE PUBLIC. Site Key Notes 0 A 8612 CURB AND GUTTER B PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP C TRAFFIC ARROW (TYP.) D HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING E BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) F MATCH EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND VALLEY SECTION G EXISTING CONCRETE CURB H PLANTED AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) I CONCRETE SIDEWALK J FLUSH CURB K TRANSITION TO FLUSH CURB L TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) M UNDERGROUND PARKING ENTRANCE N DELIVERY TRUCK PARKING 0 EMPLOYEE PARKING P FIRE LANE Q MONUMENT SIGN R INTERIOR COURTYARD S PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION T PICNIC SHELTER U RETAINING WALL. ALL WALLS OVER 4 FEET IN HEIGHT TO BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0' 30' 60' 90' 0011740SPP01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 4 OF 13 Site Plan ©2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. cU N - SAN \10e , 1025.20) C 1024.1 RhW J 1012.43 INV E ` 101s2.14 INV W POH - Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 1023 )7 l C _ YZA TA BOULEVARD WEST ;_7 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota %R11L Ryan K Bluhm Date 03/20/18 License No. 41257 Revisions 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cal1811.com Grading Legend Grading Notes Common Ground Alliance EXISTING PROPOSED 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PROPERTY LINE PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND -980- _�98o- INDEX CONTOUR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE -982 -982 _ INTERVAL CONTOUR NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. CURB AND GUTTER 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND to RIDGE LINE DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND SILT FENCE EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. Sro® ►► ■ STORM SEWER / V 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF STANDARD -7025- / (`P RIPRAP SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS � 1024 / Qwar WATER MAIN PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. SAN ► SANITARY SEWER 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR Q� \ ROCK EXIT SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 3 �-1022.92 RIM \ FIBER BLANKET 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC 1014.89 /NV. W -S \ 91.00 CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN -WAT No �-1021.58 RIM XXs1.00 SPOT ELEVATION AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF WA 12.02 INV N -S THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC war O U INLET PROTECTION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. D so \ *4 RETAINING WALL 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 102 .3 STo 1022.0 \ o i o o 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A _ 1022.44 '� ro SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS kill.Z Q 1022.1 1 ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. _ � "�\ � 7 0 �3 6 - 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, \ 1 \1020.16 RIM \ _loi V1 10 �g 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE 9.\ INV w -SE �� - FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.31`1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. I \�� 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE -1020.80 �qr GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR H WL=1013.0 UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND -1020.7 8 � AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. n THE REGULATING AGENCIES. T-1\�� 00 �yq r\ -1020.E 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A -T-;n-", nn-�_ I LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER �T-1025.70 --B-1017.93 T-1026.00 B-1017.82 ,'l 1009 �104912. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT \ REQUIREMENTS. 6 - 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, \ WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY _loi V1 MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY -LOADED TANDEM -AXLE DUMP ro TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF - FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.31`1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY CD COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT NWL=1009.0 EXISTING POND WL t GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR H WL=1013.0 UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. (PER DESIGN PLAN) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS � AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. n Erosion Control Notes 1009- 10 10 009- 1010 RMB Prepared for: Apex HLLC Checked: RMB Drawn: SYE 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Record Drawing by�date Minneapolis, MN 55405 1. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND SITE IN ALL FILL AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE SITE, PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 3. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CATCH BASIN INSERTS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO OR EQUIVALENT) AROUND ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER OVER EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IF NOT BEING ACTIVELY GRADED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS. 6. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR WOOD FIBER BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 7. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY. Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0011740GDPOl .dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 5 OF 13 Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan C)2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. SAN -1020.46 RIM �i 1014.13 INV NE 1016.61 INV W i 1013.91 INV S X ;PST ---- 70.-- { STO 24 /NCH- I 1-1021.13 RIM o 1009.83 /N V. E -W 8 /NCh - SANSAN SM WA WA AT- I 1020.56 RIM --- 1013.69 /NV N 1012.91 INV E CBMH 206 RE=1025.50 IE=1021.50 49 LF 12" I RCP 0 0.88% 1024. 1012.43 INV E \` 101s2.14/NVW G. POH - POH Utility Legend EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE / - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE / CURB AND GUTTER SAN SANITARY SEWER STO F= ►► ■ STORM SEWER WA T- I WATER MAIN VQ WA I-..} HYDRANT >< GATE VALVE _ FLARED END SECTION CONNECT TO EXISTING 6 PVC SANITARY (WITH RIPRAP) CONNECT TO EXISTING r-1023.74 RIM STUB AND EXTEND 33 LF. FIELD VFRIFY WM STUB WITH HYDRANT i 1012.74 /NV. E-ry 0 I N AND INVERT ELEVATION. AND 6" GATE VALVE cd^ K'tLEP 'PARKWA Y N H - SAN �a A= -1022.92 RIM \ W WAr war- 4ZlOR-TO-STORM SEWER _C� STRUCTION V y- N r 1014.89 /NV. W -SE \ CLEARANCE AT UTILITY�ROSSING WITH --Fid �-1021.58 RIM \ VERIFIED SANITARY STUB IN RT. NOTIFY ENGINEER WA CONNECfi TO EXLS151a.02 /NV N \ sro sro 30 /N��' IF ADJUSTMEN H T CBMH 104 \ I F CBMH 106 RE=1023.90 IE=1020.40 Westwood C71 STMH 205 RE=1026.30 I E=1021.07 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ro r 7( crn � � AND 6" GA VALVE RE=1023.00 \ 17U --sro D - "N)=1017.50 \ 57 LF 12" - - s ` 1-(S)=10i 4.27 \ _ - - - - - RCP 0 0.58% ! ar IE(E)= i 4.10 \ ZBWH_1b5 ► % \ ro qr \ RE=1024.00 �► - \ 257 LF 12 RCP 0 1.00% ►► \ \ IE=1020.07 _ �j wSg CF�' sr wq \ AREA DRAIN 302 AREA DRAIN 301 RE=1027.50 RE=1027.50 IE=1020.90 IE=1020.70 STMH 204 RE=1026.90 I E(E, W)=1020.79 IE(S)=1021.50 LF 12'" ;JP 8 LF 12" RCP 02.00% 8" PVC WM STUB PROPOSED BUILDING SANITARY STUB-/ IE=1019.00 COORDINATE GARAGE DRAIN SUMP WITH MECHANICAL VERIFY SERVICE SIZE WITH PLUMBING DESIGN PER STATE PLUMBING CODE HYDRANT WITH 6" GATE VALVE STMH 202 Footprint = 39,1976 s.f. SCHEDULE FFE=1028.p IE E,W,N =1020.40 ( ) GARAGE=1017.0 3" PVC RE=1026.60 0.50% 101 59 LF 10" SCH-40 0 0.50% - - IES =1021.35 STMH 203 RE=1026.90 SANITARY STUB-/ IE=1019.00 COORDINATE GARAGE DRAIN SUMP WITH MECHANICAL VERIFY SERVICE SIZE WITH PLUMBING DESIGN PER STATE PLUMBING CODE HYDRANT WITH 6" GATE VALVE STMH 202 011.47 X44 LF 12" \ RCP 0 0.30% 20 LF 0 1.00% TRENCH DRAIN RE=1016.90 IE(S)=1014.60 IE(N)=1014.40, STMH 201 RE=1026.70 IE(W)=1019.25 IE(SE)=1019.2; IE(S)=101020.6-5 11- 48 LF 127�" RCP 0 1.00% \-1021.95 RIM CBMH 210 025 90 1009.65 /NV E -W IE=1021.13 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST (HENNEP/N COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 112) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revisionm direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans %R11L Ryan K Bluhm �� 03/20/18 ><.iaene Na 41257 Checked: RMB Drawn: SYE Record Drawing by/date: CBMH 1030 Rr= =l 022.00 =1013,52 O OT 1 I� � 13 � II CBMH 102J RE=1024.00 IE(NW)=1012.25 IE(E)=1012.05 LF -8" _Pt I I II �I I I I I 3 I I I �I I j___L I� I I 11020.16 RIM I 11909.03 /NV W -SE 1 � 1 *1 \ 0 `1009.24 /NV 30 /NCH I -FES 101 IE=1011.70 I 35 LF 18" RCP 01.00% -8" GATE VALVE -CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" PVC WM WITH 12"x8" TEE i 1009.01 INV 30 INCH -APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 12" HDPE SDR11 WM. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF WM. 70J Prepared for: Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com General Utility Notes Common Ground Alliance 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 -HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER MAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE, CLASS 52 WITH 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18" FROM SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5' OF COVER. 13. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 14. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, PIPE SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 15. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WITH R-4 GASKETS, OR HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY. HDPE STORM PIPE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2648. PIPE SHALL BE WATER TIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D3212 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS & RIP -RAP. STORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NUMBER TYPE IE E,W,N =1020.40 ( ) CASTING TYPE 6 LF -6 PVC RE=1026.60 101 FES IES =1021.35 102 IE(W,S)=1019.92 48" R-3067 103 CBMH 48" R-3067 104 CBMH 48" R-3067 105 IE(E)=1019.92 6 LF -8" PVC�L�-�-['-' R-3067 106 2011 LF7 -8" PVC 1 I 2'x3' j�LF 12" RCP 0 0.��% - - - - ►►97 LF 12" RCP ®►�50% - - ►► 94 LF 15" RCP f►0.50% R -1642B 202 12 LF 12"� --- ---- R -1642B 203 RCP ®1.00% aT -30 /NCH 14 LF 15" -sro s,o CBMH 209 CBMH 208 8 LF 12" RCP To - c n crn 5T( RCP ®0.35% RE=1026.60 IE=1021.66 RE=1026.60 01.00% CBMH 207 CBMH IE=1021.43 R-3067 RE=1026.10 x x x x x_ IE=1020.04 CBMH - GAS R-3067 209 CBMH Gr, �e PON rG: -POhI OH „ POH CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 RAISE STMH RIM AND ADJUST AREA DRAIN 12" NYLOPLAST CASTING AS NEEDED TO AREA DRAIN 12" NYLOPLAST AVOID PROPOSED CURB RE=1026.34 IE(N)=1020.60 IE(E,W)= I009� .65 011.47 X44 LF 12" \ RCP 0 0.30% 20 LF 0 1.00% TRENCH DRAIN RE=1016.90 IE(S)=1014.60 IE(N)=1014.40, STMH 201 RE=1026.70 IE(W)=1019.25 IE(SE)=1019.2; IE(S)=101020.6-5 11- 48 LF 127�" RCP 0 1.00% \-1021.95 RIM CBMH 210 025 90 1009.65 /NV E -W IE=1021.13 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST (HENNEP/N COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 112) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revisionm direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans %R11L Ryan K Bluhm �� 03/20/18 ><.iaene Na 41257 Checked: RMB Drawn: SYE Record Drawing by/date: CBMH 1030 Rr= =l 022.00 =1013,52 O OT 1 I� � 13 � II CBMH 102J RE=1024.00 IE(NW)=1012.25 IE(E)=1012.05 LF -8" _Pt I I II �I I I I I 3 I I I �I I j___L I� I I 11020.16 RIM I 11909.03 /NV W -SE 1 � 1 *1 \ 0 `1009.24 /NV 30 /NCH I -FES 101 IE=1011.70 I 35 LF 18" RCP 01.00% -8" GATE VALVE -CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" PVC WM WITH 12"x8" TEE i 1009.01 INV 30 INCH -APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 12" HDPE SDR11 WM. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF WM. 70J Prepared for: Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com General Utility Notes Common Ground Alliance 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 -HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER MAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE, CLASS 52 WITH 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18" FROM SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5' OF COVER. 13. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 14. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, PIPE SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 15. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WITH R-4 GASKETS, OR HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY. HDPE STORM PIPE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2648. PIPE SHALL BE WATER TIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D3212 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS & RIP -RAP. STORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NUMBER TYPE DIA. CASTING TYPE 101 FES 18" 1----- 102 CBMH 48" R-3067 103 CBMH 48" R-3067 104 CBMH 48" R-3067 105 CBMH 48" R-3067 106 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 201 STMH 48" R -1642B 202 STMH 48" R -1642B 203 STMH 48" R -1642B 204 STMH 48" R -1642B 205 STMH 48" R -1642B 206 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 207 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 208 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 209 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 210 CBMH 2'x3' R-3067 301 AREA DRAIN 12" NYLOPLAST 302 AREA DRAIN 12" NYLOPLAST Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0' 30' 60' 90' 0011740UTPOl.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 6 OF 13 Utility Plan C)2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. L COMPACTED BACKFILL Bc O.SBe 2000# CONCRETE 0' SBC LOAD FACTOR 2.3 BC+12" MIN. "Bc" DENOTES O DECLASS A DIAMETER OF PIPE CONCRETE BACKFILL TO 0.5 OF OUTSIDE DIAMETER WITH SHAPED BEDDING. 12" COMPACTED BACKFILL + + + ~• 0.5Bc+++ BC/4 BUT NOT COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE + + + + + P + MNDOT SPEC. 3149H MOD. LESS THAN 6" - + + + + + + - LOAD FACTOR 1.9 ec+12" MIN.7DIAMETER Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE CLASS B Bc+12" 7MIN. OF PIPE HAND SHAPED FROM ANGULAR LBEDDING MATERIAL 6" COMPACTED BACKFILL _ Bc • • COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT SPECT 3149H MOD. 0.580 "BC' DENOTES OUTSIDE LOAD FACTOR 1.5 Bc+12" MIN. DIAMETER OF PIPE CLASS C-1 HAND SHAPED FROM FIRM UNDISTURBED SOIL 6" COMPACTED BACKFILL BC/4 BUT NOT+++ COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT SPEC. 3149H MOD. +�� 0 �- + + LESS THAN 6" - + + + + + + LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE CLASS C-2 =1+11MIN.1 DIAMETER OF PIPE HAND SHAPED FROM ANGULAR BEDDING MATERIAL Q A. LAST REVISION: O O BEDDING METHODS JAN 2006 F FOR RCP <4$seuoa� GEN -4 139 GEN-4.DWG PVB�G�O� Sa,M IV, 46, ROCK -6" MINIMUM DEPTH- J pU. p(, p(� p(, WOOD/MULCH-12" X9..0 00 DO DO 00 0 MINIMUM DEPTH OQOOQOOQOOQO OOo OOO WASHED ROCK OR WOOD/MULCH PER VJtOAN SPECIFICATIONS 20 M`NlMUM 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTES: 1. MnDOT 3733 TYPE 4 FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK OR MULCH TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH MATERIAL. 2. FUGITIVE ROCK OR MULCH WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY. 3. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS ON THE SITE. 4. THE ENTRANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER CONDITION TO PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD OFF THE SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL ROCK, WOOD/MULCH, OR REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF THE PAD. 5. THIS ENTRANCE WILL BE USED BY ALL VEHICLES ENTERING OR LEAVING THE PROJECT. 6. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS SURFACING. 10.04, REVISION: 0. �O CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Aprii zoos ROCK WOOD / MULCH PATE NO. GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 1/2 DIAMETER AT PIPE AND SLOPE GROUT 2" TOWARD INVERT. \ MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. / NEENAH R1642B FRAME AND COVER OR EQUAL WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES. MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 6 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH 2 BEADS OF PLAN RAM-NEK BETWEEN BOTH BOTTOM RING AND STRUCTURE AND TOP RING AND FOR 6' DIAM. MANHOLE AN 8" CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN PRECAST SLAB IS REQUIRED. MIDDLE RINGS. MORTAR SHALL BE PURE PORTLAND SPECMIX OR APPROVED EQUAL. INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE (MIN. 2" OVERLAT.) 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE i. MANHOLE SLAB WITH #4 BARS AT 5" O.C. EACH WAY AND 244 BARS AT ALL SIDES OF OPENING. y S., INSTALL INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R1981J OR EQUAL, 16" ON CENTER. u� 4'-0" OR 6-0" ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. a ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE > � SLOPE "O" RING RUBBER GASKETS. PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLUSH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' 5" DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', SECTION AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6" 10/10 MESH. O� Q ASO LAST REVISION: •Y JUNCTION MANHOLE WITH SLAB TOP JAN 2011 " > F STORM SEWER • G [�N�0 139-STO-2.DWG Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. COMPACTED BACKFILL 12" +++ + + + + ++ GRANULAR BORROW Bc ++ + MNDOT SPEC. 3149A b++ MOD. 6" =12MIN' Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE IAMETER OF PIPE PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS COMPACTED 1 BACKFILL 12" + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + COURSE FILTER + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + BO + + + + + AGGR. MNDOT ++++++++++ 0.8B+++++++4 - SPEC. 3149H MOD. + + + + + + + + + + 6" PAY DEPTH FOUNDATION 6" PAY Bc+12" MIN. "Bc" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS 04Q LAST REVISION: 0 BEDDING METHODS JAN 2006 y F FOR VCP, PVC, DIP OR HDPE O PLATE NO. GEN -5 139 GEN-5.DWG NOTES: ALL DIP WATERMAIN SHALL BE DROP LID WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL POLY wnrER TYLER NO. 6860 INCLUDING ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS MUELLER NO. H-10361 BIPPY-STE-CROIX NO. B-5160 7.5' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. MEGALUGS OR 2 - 3/4" TIE RODS REQUIRED FROM VALVE TO TEE. GRADE TOP TYLER NO. 6860 26" ADJUST TOP TO 1/2 BELOW MUELLER NO. H-10361 26" GRADE. BOX TO BE SET TO BIPPY-STE-CROD( NO. VB502 27" PROVIDE 12" OF ADJUSTMENT. EXTENSION TYLER NO. 6860 TYLER NO. 58 14" MUELLER NO. H-10357 NO. 59 18" BIPPY-STE-CROIX B-5001 N0. 60 24" GATE VALVE BOX, SCREW TYPE, MUELLER NO. 58 14" 3 PIECE, 5 1/4" SHAFT, SIZE G NO. 59 20" BOX, 7-6" EXTENDED, #6 BIPPY-STE-CROIX ROUND BASE VB520 NO.57 9" VB521 NO.58 14" VB522 NO.59 20" VB523 NO.60 26" NUT EXTENSION INSTALLED ONLY WHEN REQUIRED BOTTOM STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS TYLER NO. 6860 65" MUELLER NO. H-10361 65" BIPPY-STE-CROIX NO. VB516 60" RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS 3' GATE VALVE ADAPTER r MEGALUG �MEGALUG BASE 8" CONC. BLOCK 04 Q LAST REVISION: �O GATE VALVE AND BDX JAN 2011 INSTALLATION pLATENO. 139-WAT-I.DWG 24"X36" SLAB OPENING FOR NEENAH R3067V OR EQUAL (VANE GRATE SHOWN) GRATE SHALL HAVE "DUMP NO WASTE, DRAINS TO FRESH WATER ON CASTING. DIMENSION FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF PIPE. 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BACK OF CURB 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BACK OF CURB V DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BACK OF CURB 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BACK OF CURB MINIMUM OF 2 AND MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK BETWEEN BOTH PLAN BOTTOM RING AND STRUCTURE, TOP RING AND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAR 3" RADIUS BETWEEN MIDDLE RINGS. INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE AROUND ALL ADJUSTING RINGS (MIN. Y' OVERLAP.) 1 VARIES RING W/RAM-NEK=0.23'; MAX. HORIZONTAL OFFSET=0.25'(3"). 12'-16" 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. TOP OF BARREL SECTION UNDER TOP SLAB VARIES TO HAVE FLAT TOP EDGE SEALED WITH 2 4'-0" TYP. BEADS OF RAMNEK OR EQUAL. WRAP EXTERIOR JOINT WITH INFI-SHIELD v 5" GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL. LWn ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE "0" RING RUBBER GASKETS. PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R19813 OR �6" PIPE EQUAL, 15" O.C., ALUMINUM STEPS DIA APPROVED. 4" PVC TEE FOR DRAINTILE CONNECTION. E. NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR SECTION STRUCTURES 14'IN DEPTH. INCREASE MAL SHALL BE PURE PORTLAN THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH SPECMIX OR APPROVED EQUAL. GREATER THAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6" 10/10 MESH. GROUT BOTTOM Q A� LA57 REVISION: Ol O CATCHBASIN MANHOLE JAN 2011 TYPE II Ci PLATE ND. r 139-STO-3.DWG STEEL FENCE POST (T -POST), MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE MINIMUM 5' LONG, FABRIC PER MNDOT TABLE 6' MAXIMUM SPACING. 3886-1. ATTACH FABRIC TO POST WITH MINIMUM 3 ZIP TIES (50 LB. TENSILE) PER POST IN TOP 8" OF FABRIC. POST NOTCHES TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC. LAY FABRIC IN THE TRENCH, BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL, AND COMPACT WITH LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE POSTS. DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 6- 24" MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT 6" NOTES: 1. SPLICING WILL BE MADE AT OPPOSING SILT FENCE POSTS BY PLACING POSTS AND SILT FENCE NEXT TO EACH OTHER AND ROTATING 360'. 2. HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE IS MACHINE SLICED TYPE SILT FENCE THAT IS HAND INSTALLED IN AREAS INACCESSIBLE TO EQUIPMENT DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS, WET SOILS, STEEP SLOPES, ETC. 4 Q � UST REVISION: O O 11 SILT FENCE AP�i zoos HEAVY DUTY ° PIATENO. ERO-1C "HYDRAFINDER" HYDRANT LOCATOR (PROVIDE 2 PER HYDRANT, HYDRANT SHALL BE WATEROUS DELVER EXTRA ONE TO ORONO PACER WB -100 OR WB -67 WITH PUBLIC WORKS.) STAINLESS BOLTS AND 16" TRAFFIC BREAK OFF SECTION HYDRANT SHALL BE FOR 8.0' BURY. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE T-6" OF COVER. FOR VALVE BOX INSTALLTION SEE DETAIL PLATE NO. WAT-1. CONNECT PLAN LAST REVISION: ]AN 2006 s O <'AEeITOO WATER MAIN WET TAP TRACER WIRE 36"- 90" BEND WAT 4 r B1 TO BOTTOM m a D2 16" BREAK OFF HYDRANTS AND GATE VALVES NUT OF x 12" 1 -+ 12" Om ru 1'-S" SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH HYDRANT WITH DIRECTION . g 111" MEGALUGS. RING TERMINAL m 2'-8" 2'-0" 12"1'-10" a WOODCHIPS, 3,1" a� RESILIENT WEDGE VALVE III - STRAW MULCH 2'4" CONFORMING TO AW WA DRIVEWAY 6'-2" C-509-80 STANDARDS. OR ROCK ENTRANCE BERM OR APPROVED EQUAL 2'4" GRADE EXTEND SILT FENCE, WOODCHIPS, 8'1" 4'4" OR GEOTEXTILE BAG TO 4'4" ALL D.I.P. WATERMAIN PERIMETER OF ENTRANCE SILT FENCE \ ; o PROFILE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH Mly TO MATCH BACK OF SILT FENCE --_,,22 a T-3" 6'4" 8 MIL PLASTIC. INCLUDING 6'-0" pm g , ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS DIRECTION OF FLOW �y �" a in Fes: 0 24" U I-4-6" Y N 3, AND POLY TAPED AT ALL WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. -�0 Y ¢ .0 .. JOINTS 2O G STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS GATE SOD, OR VALVE STRAW MULCH MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' lIrrM UG 11 NOTE: INSTALL SILT FENCE USING SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED METHOD Q LAST REVISION: 0. O '6 „LEAD L :..:::.. ..: ...a LOOP 8" CONC. BLOCK TRACER 1 CU. YD. OF 1 1/2" ROCK, COVER WIRE TO WITH 2 LAYERS OF POLYETHYLENE. HYDRANT 04 Q LAST REVISION: �O VALVE AND HYDRANT JAN 2011 INSTALLATION "d, G PLATE N0. <°'ri.:tasoa� WAT-2 TAPPING SLEEVE �X �MEGALUG \ c 0 I A PLAN CONDUCTIVITY STRAP NOTE: ALL DIP WATERMAIN SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL POLY. INCLUDING ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS 7.5' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS SECTION A -A COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL UNDISTURBED EARTH 8" CONC. BLOCK 1604` ` 0. V0 PLAN LAST REVISION: ]AN 2006 s O <'AEeITOO WATER MAIN WET TAP PROFILE 36"- 90" BEND WAT 4 r B1 Dl m a D2 B3 D3 ILII x 12" 1 -+ 12" Om ru 1'-S" w U w 12" 4-0„ 3„ r DIRECTION . g 111" OF FLOW , 2'-1„ m 2'-8" 2'-0" 12"1'-10" a WOODCHIPS, 3,1" a� SOD, OR III - STRAW MULCH 2'4" 1 _ DRIVEWAY 6'-2" T-6" OR ROCK ENTRANCE BERM OR APPROVED EQUAL 2'4" PLAN EXTEND SILT FENCE, WOODCHIPS, 8'1" 4'4" OR GEOTEXTILE BAG TO 4'4" T-0" PERIMETER OF ENTRANCE SILT FENCE \ ; o PROFILE 3 0" Mly TO MATCH BACK OF SILT FENCE --_,,22 a T-3" 6'4" 17-0" 6'-0" pm g , 0 z m w DIRECTION OF FLOW �y �" a in Fes: 0 24" U I-4-6" Y N Fa V 'f� WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. -�0 Y ¢ .0 .. 2O G ,cm WOODCHIPS, SOD, OR < STRAW MULCH MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' NOTE: INSTALL SILT FENCE USING SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED METHOD Q LAST REVISION: 0. O AP i zoos AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6"10/10 MESH. BACK OF CURB PERIMETER CONTROL r F v WITH SIDEWALK pATENO. <°n �p4 w4-, �.p� ERO-1F TAPPING SLEEVE �X �MEGALUG \ c 0 I A PLAN CONDUCTIVITY STRAP NOTE: ALL DIP WATERMAIN SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL POLY. INCLUDING ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS 7.5' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS SECTION A -A COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL UNDISTURBED EARTH 8" CONC. BLOCK 1604` ` 0. V0 BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS LAST REVISION: ]AN 2006 s O <'AEeITOO WATER MAIN WET TAP PLATE NO. ` 90" BEND WAT 4 r 139-WAT-2.DWG 139-WAT-4.DWG Y-0" NOTE: VANE GRATE SHOWN 0 V FACE OF CURB DIRECTION OF FLOW CATCHBASIN CASTING NEENAH R3067 OR EQUAL WITH VANE GRATE 2" RADIUS CURB BOX. PLAN GRATE SHALL HAVE FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN 'DUMP NO WASTE, MIDDLE RINGS. MAX HORIZONTAL DRAINS TO FRESH WATER OFFSET = 0.25'. ON CASTING. GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER MIN. OF 2 MAX. OF 6 GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. RINGS WITH 2 RINGS OF VARIABLE RAM-NEK BETWEEN BOTH BOTTOM RING AND TOP OF CURB STRUCTURE, TOP RING AND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN MIDDLE RINGS. 24" X 36" 6 1/2" INFI-SHIELD SEALING PRECAST SLEEVE OR APPROVED 5" EQUAL (MIN. Z' OVERLAP.) 3" GROUT DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND THE INSIDE. MORTAL SHALL BE PURE PORTLAND SECTION SPECMIX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 0 LAST REVISION: TYPE II JAN 2011 r CATCHBASIN PLATE NO. r 139-STO-5.DWG I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revisionm direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGIAIESR under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans Ryan K Bluhm �,� 03/20/18 �� Na 41257 DISTANCE TO c VARIABLE 3"R FINISHED WEAR COURSE 1 SLOPE Y' TO BE 1 ABOVE EDGE O 3/4" PER FT zOFGUTTER M s� CONCRETE MNDOT B618 FINISHED WEAR COURSE TO BE ^�50 �1/2" ABOVE EDGE OF GUTTER. C .q.. ' • . '. 1 +y . . . .. 'M 17 1/2" 10 1/2" CONCRETE SURMOUNTABLE D-428 3'RESIDENTIAL VARIABLE 3' RESIDENTIAL `8618 5' COMMERCIAL V COMMERCIAL / CONTROL JOINT L EXPANSION JOINT DRIVEWAY CURB CUT (BOTH SIDES) 2 1/2" 6'0„ 1 1/8"R BITUMINOUS SURFACE N 2" BTUMINOUS-6" SHOE FORMED CURB O� Q�O IASi REVISION: JAN 2008 CURB AND GUTTER P ATE NO. STR-1 J 139-STR-I.DWG RMB Prepared for: cite�xea: RMB Drawn: SYE Record Drawing by/date: ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT 1.5' INTERVALS. STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL LONGITUDINAL JOINTS FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS MINIMUM OF 6" SPECIFICATIONS ANCHOR TRENCH 1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH 3. STAPLE AT 1.5' INTERVALS 4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT'6" 5. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' I WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH ... .1....J� NOTE: SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS, STICKS, VEHICLE IMPRINTS, AND GRASS. BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. 4 A. U15T REVISION: O O Q EROSION CONTROL BLANKET APrii zoos F INSTALLATION Ci FEPF2A NOTES: 1. SHAPE OF BACK OF BUTTRESS MAY VERY AS LONG AS POURED AGAINST FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. DIMENSION C1,C2,C3 SHOULD BE LARGE ENOUGH TO MAKE ANGLE 0 EQUAL TO OR LARGER THAN 45". 3. DIMENSION A1,A2,A3 SHOULD BE AS LARGE AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH MJ BOLTS. 4. 0 = 45o MINIMUM. S. PLACE POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN CONCRETE & PIPE. 0 -SEE NOTE 4 0 -SEE NOTE 4 eP A PLAN 900 BENDS PLAN 450 BENDS VARIABLE 3 MIN. 0 -SEE NOTE 4 6" CONCRETE SHALL BE A IN CONTACT WITH -� `y. " A THIS QUADRANT OF 0 PIPE o BEDDING MATERIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH CONCRETE SECTION A -A PLAN 22 1/2° BENDS 0¢ 0 lASi REVISION: V0 MARCH 2008 CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING '� PLATE NO. G <arx:>n °w4' WAT-6 J 139-WAT-6.Dwg CATCHBASIN FRAME & COVER NEENAH R-3067 OR EQUAL WITH TYPE DL GRATE ' ,Q .x� .,illlll NOTE CATCHBASIN TO BE DEPRESSED 2" 1P�ZN BELOW DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE A_ B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER ISOMETRIC 2 - #4 REBARS NO SCALE o O 10' MIN. TRANSITION 10' MIN. TRANSITION z0 z `^ 0 TOP OF a W) CURB- =7 URB 2" a a w DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE 2 - #4 REBARS FRAME & CASTING SECTION A -A NO SCALE Q� 0 \O LAST REVISION: <Y B618 CURB & GUTTER JAN 2ooe F CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN O PLATE N0. 139-STR-2.DWG Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 ISOMETRIC VIEW -FILTER ASSEMBLY POLYESTER SLEEVE STRUCTURE COVER ASSEMBLY CATCH BASIN IN-PLACE ELEVATION VIEW Y Q- AUST REVISION: O 0 INLET PROTECTION, TYPE A APrii zoos ROAD DRAIN 2x3 TOP SLAB MODEL pATENO. �eoG ERO 4C 12 AWG WATER -PROOF RING TERMINAL O FINISH GRADE CONNECT END OF BOTH TRACER 1/2" PVC WIRES FINISH GRADE HYDRANT CONNECTION 12 AWG 1T MANLINE J 12 AWG WIRE, STRIP, BRANCH DO NOT CUT. WIRE, STRIP DIRECT BURY LUG Q ]AST REVISION: O, O MARCH 2011 TRACER WIRE CONNECTIONS F �� , s Ci PLATE N0. <aBitiseuoa� WAT-8 EXISTING CURB OVERFLOW IS 1/z OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT O � 00000 000 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY i- CURB BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS t - FILTER ASSEMBLY PIPE 22 1/2o BEND 45° BEND 90" BEND SIZE B1 Dl B2 D2 B3 D3 6" V-5" 1'-5" 1'-S" 1'-5" 2'-1" V-6" 8" 111" 1111, 2'-1„ 1'-6" 2'-8" 2'-0" 12"1'-10" V-10" 3,1" 2'-0" 4'-9" 2-6" 16" T-0" 2'4" 3'-10" T-0" 6'-2" T-6" 20" T-6" 2'4" T-6' 3'1" 8'1" 4'4" P24" 4'4" T-0" 6'-10" T-10" 9'-8" T-0" 3 0" Mly TO MATCH BACK OF - T-3" 6'4" 17-0" 6'-0" 0 -SEE NOTE 4 0 -SEE NOTE 4 eP A PLAN 900 BENDS PLAN 450 BENDS VARIABLE 3 MIN. 0 -SEE NOTE 4 6" CONCRETE SHALL BE A IN CONTACT WITH -� `y. " A THIS QUADRANT OF 0 PIPE o BEDDING MATERIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH CONCRETE SECTION A -A PLAN 22 1/2° BENDS 0¢ 0 lASi REVISION: V0 MARCH 2008 CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING '� PLATE NO. G <arx:>n °w4' WAT-6 J 139-WAT-6.Dwg CATCHBASIN FRAME & COVER NEENAH R-3067 OR EQUAL WITH TYPE DL GRATE ' ,Q .x� .,illlll NOTE CATCHBASIN TO BE DEPRESSED 2" 1P�ZN BELOW DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE A_ B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER ISOMETRIC 2 - #4 REBARS NO SCALE o O 10' MIN. TRANSITION 10' MIN. TRANSITION z0 z `^ 0 TOP OF a W) CURB- =7 URB 2" a a w DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE 2 - #4 REBARS FRAME & CASTING SECTION A -A NO SCALE Q� 0 \O LAST REVISION: <Y B618 CURB & GUTTER JAN 2ooe F CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN O PLATE N0. 139-STR-2.DWG Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 ISOMETRIC VIEW -FILTER ASSEMBLY POLYESTER SLEEVE STRUCTURE COVER ASSEMBLY CATCH BASIN IN-PLACE ELEVATION VIEW Y Q- AUST REVISION: O 0 INLET PROTECTION, TYPE A APrii zoos ROAD DRAIN 2x3 TOP SLAB MODEL pATENO. �eoG ERO 4C 12 AWG WATER -PROOF RING TERMINAL O FINISH GRADE CONNECT END OF BOTH TRACER 1/2" PVC WIRES FINISH GRADE HYDRANT CONNECTION 12 AWG 1T MANLINE J 12 AWG WIRE, STRIP, BRANCH DO NOT CUT. WIRE, STRIP DIRECT BURY LUG Q ]AST REVISION: O, O MARCH 2011 TRACER WIRE CONNECTIONS F �� , s Ci PLATE N0. <aBitiseuoa� WAT-8 EXISTING CURB OVERFLOW IS 1/z OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT O � 00000 000 PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY i- CURB GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 1/2 DIAMETER AT PIPE AND SLOPE GROUT 2" TOWARD INVERT. VARIES t - FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, / 6" ON -GRADE CONCRETE CURBz 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, MESH AND HAVE 6" OF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE z Z INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. 96 0 A LAST REVISION: 01 YO INLET PROTECTION, TYPE C April 2008 CATCH BASIN INSERT AFTER PAVING PATE NO. EQUAL WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES. ERO-4I GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 1/2 DIAMETER AT PIPE AND SLOPE GROUT 2" TOWARD INVERT. 139-WAT-8.Dwg 139-STO-I.DWG VARIES CONCRETE SLAB 5" MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND 6" MINIMUM THICKNESS -~c / MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED CONCRETE CURBz RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS r AND GUTTER (SEE 2 SO THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION PLATE STR-1� z MESH AND HAVE 6" OF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE z Z a OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. < NEENAH R1642B FRAME AND COVER OR e w z EQUAL WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES. SECTION 0 � u PLAN INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE S• MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 6 CONCRETE Cr- $OS�C,- S GYrlO� ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH 2 RINGS OF i FR7y RAM-NEK BETWEEN EACH. El's UNF gNSlON 27" MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R19811 OR EQUAL, 16" ON CENTER. V- ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. �fNT 0�,0`N� ONS ALL ]DINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE G CONCRETE PAVEMENT S Mly TO MATCH BACK OF "0" RING RUBBER GASKETS. P 5„ 4'-0" NOTE: ISOMETRIC CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE CURB PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLUSH NOT TO EXCEED 10' SPACING THROUGH DRIVEWAY SECTION. WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. -�0 DRIVEWAY SECTION PLATE NO. > NOTE: KOR-N-SEAL MANHOLE OR EQUAL CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', SECTION AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6"10/10 MESH. Q LAST REVISION: �O 0. JAN 2006 w4-, �.p� STORM SEWER JUNCTION MANHOLE PLATE N0. 6G 139-WAT-8.Dwg 139-STO-I.DWG R VARIESCL VARIES R VARIES TO BACK VARIES TO BACK 4.0% MIN. 2,0% VARIES 3.0% 3.0% 6.0"/" MAX. �� STREET SECTION AS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF TRAIUSIDEWALK 8618 CONC. CURB &GUTTER AS SPECIFIED. NOTE: SEE DETAIL PLATE NO. GEN 5 FOR LOCATION VOR 6' WIDE I FACE OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS S WIDE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS 6' WIDE ALONG COLLECTOR STREETS 4" CONCRETE WITH 4" MIN. CLASS 5. DMEROCK *UNLES DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY ENGINEER PLAN VARIES CONCRETE SLAB 5" MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND 6" MINIMUM THICKNESS -~c 5 FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS. BOTH o CONCRETE CURBz RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS r AND GUTTER (SEE 2 TO BE REINFORCED WITH 6X6-10/10 WIRE o w PLATE STR-1� z MESH AND HAVE 6" OF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE z Z a BASE. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) a p < 0 o e w z SECTION 0 � u NO SCALE S• '?, '0 Cr- $OS�C,- S GYrlO� PROs i FR7y El's UNF gNSlON ��O�N� ORS 301 3, Q-agysl GO� 6.MfN �fNT 0�,0`N� ONS G CONCRETE PAVEMENT S Mly TO MATCH BACK OF Py CONCRETE CURB AT G\- OF O THIS POINT NOTE: ISOMETRIC CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE CURB NO SCALE NOT TO EXCEED 10' SPACING THROUGH DRIVEWAY SECTION. .Q, Q A� '�Y 0. 1��] -�0 DRIVEWAY SECTION PLATE NO. R VARIESCL VARIES R VARIES TO BACK VARIES TO BACK 4.0% MIN. 2,0% VARIES 3.0% 3.0% 6.0"/" MAX. �� STREET SECTION AS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF TRAIUSIDEWALK 8618 CONC. CURB &GUTTER AS SPECIFIED. NOTE: SEE DETAIL PLATE NO. GEN 5 FOR LOCATION VOR 6' WIDE I FACE OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS S WIDE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS 6' WIDE ALONG COLLECTOR STREETS 4" CONCRETE WITH 4" MIN. CLASS 5. DMEROCK *UNLES DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY ENGINEER PLAN VARIES DESIGN STREET GRAD MAX 20:1 SIDEWALK/TRAIL AS CURB & GUTTER SPECIFIED SECTION A -A 0 LAST REVISION: 0. V0 JAN 2006 TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL O PLATE NO. 139_STR-4.DWG 139-STR-I1.DWG Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0011740DTPOl .dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 7 of 13 Civil Details ©2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 6" MAX. SEE PLATE NO. ST05 FOR RIPRAP PLACEMENT. ANCHOR CLIP TIE LAST 3 PIPE JOINTS. USE 2 TIE BOLT FASTENERS PER JOINT. INSTALL AT 600 FROM TOP OR BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE 3 ANCHOR CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUARD TO FLARED END SECTION HOT DIP GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. H J TRASH GUARD SIZING PIPE 'H' BOLT STD. BAR HEAVY DUTY SIZE DIA. DIA. BAR DIA. 12"-24" 4" 5/8" 5/8"0 3/4"0 27"-48" 6" 3/4" 3/4"0 1110 54"-90" 8" 1" 1110 1 1/4"0 LAST REVISED. Wfts{wood FLARED END SECTION WITH TRASH GUARD 1 01104107 ACE Of CURE STXX CK OF `3_1`2 I 5 i17 4 B L PLAN TABLE OF QUANITIES -I--_ 3' 2 11. ' RIPRAP 1.0' 1O Illlli GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT 3733, TYPE IV. SEC, A -A NOTF- 1.0' 1O RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT 3733, TYPE IV SECTION B -B 9" MIN. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CL. 5 AGGREGATE GRAN. SUBBASE '�- 4" PERFORATED PVC PIPE SDR 35 W/ FABRIC SOCK GROUT INSIDE & OUTSIDE OF CATCH BASIN NOTE: TYPICAL LENGTH = 50 L.F. CATCH BASIN TYPICAL STREET SECTION WEAR BASE CL. 5 AGG. BASES °au•a°. a,0.: >ao o �•"aMoIN4 i o•a°�,o u•a� g" gVARIES U CLASS II d50=6 CLASS III d50=9" CLASS IV d50=12•' 2. 6" SEED AND WOODFIBER 9" 4" PERF. PVC 12" Dia. BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIPE IS INSTALLED, EXTEND AREA 12 Depth 18" Depth 24" Depth Round L Depth Granular Depth Granular Depth Granular Pipe SOCK Riprap Filter Riprap Filter Riprap Filter (In.) (Ft.) (Cu. Yd.) (Cu. Yd.) (Cu. Yd.) (Cu. Yd.) (Cu. Yd.) (Cu. Yd.) 12 8 2.8 1.4 4.1 2.1 5.5 2.8 15 8 2.9 1.5 4.4 2.2 5.8 2.9 18 10 3.9 2.0 5.9 3.0 7.8 3.9 21 10 4.2 2.1 6.3 3.2 8.4 4.2 24 12 5.5 2.8 8.3 4.2 11.0 5.5 27 12 5.8 2.9 8.7 4.4 11.6 5.8 30 14 7.3 3.7 10.9 5.5 14.5 7.3 36 16 9.2 4.6 13.8 6.9 18.3 9.2 42 18 10.9 5.5 16.3 8.2 21.7 10.9 48 20 12.9 6.5 19.4 9.7 25.8 12.9 -I--_ 3' 2 11. ' RIPRAP 1.0' 1O Illlli GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT 3733, TYPE IV. SEC, A -A NOTF- 1.0' 1O RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT 3733, TYPE IV SECTION B -B 9" MIN. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CL. 5 AGGREGATE GRAN. SUBBASE '�- 4" PERFORATED PVC PIPE SDR 35 W/ FABRIC SOCK GROUT INSIDE & OUTSIDE OF CATCH BASIN NOTE: TYPICAL LENGTH = 50 L.F. CATCH BASIN TYPICAL STREET SECTION WEAR BASE CL. 5 AGG. BASES °au•a°. a,0.: >ao o �•"aMoIN4 i o•a°�,o u•a� g" gVARIES U FOR PIPES GREATER OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 15. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE RIP RAP, PULVERIZED TOPSOIL, SEED AND WOODFIBER 4" PERF. PVC PIPE SDR 35 BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIPE IS INSTALLED, EXTEND AREA TO MATCH UNDISTURBED GRANULAR SUBBASE 12" STM a a • °° < a SOIL. MIRAFI 140-S MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT O DIMENSION "E" EQUALS INSIDE WIDTH OF APRON. PEA ROCK OR WASHED FILTER FABRIC SOCK 4. RIP RAP SHALL BE CLASS 3 SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. GRAVEL IN THIS AREA 12" SELECT GRANULAR SUBBASE BUILDING FACE RIP AT RCP COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) LA0j/0j/08ST V10. TYPE C GRATE REFER TO GE07EC77VICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. MAX -3/16" L REVISED:AST -RAP OUTLETS BITUMINOUS PAVENEW SECTION FINGER DRAIN 42" 03 03 8 SLOPE ST05 Westwood ST08 d ° HANDICAP PARKING d SPACE WITH PAINTED NOTE: BOTTOM OF INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL SIGNS TO BE 12" STM 8 8' 8' OF ACCESSIBILITY WITH MOUNTED 60"-66" a ° m CONC. PAVING �I L URB FACE OF CONTRASTING SQUARE FROM PARKING GRADE, CAP UNIT, ADHERED TO �I� MIN. MIN. MIN 0 O3 i`�1 CURB BACKGROUND, CENTERED (v SEE SIGN POST SWALE AT TOP OF WALL TOP COURSE WITH 3 TOWARD DRIVE AISLE INSTALLATION DETAIL MAY BE REQUIRED, VERIFY _ _ ADHESIVE ❑l�n� NO PARKING SIGN PARKING N M w0 ® 011111avd CENTERED AT HEAD OF 4' MIN. MIN. 5' Y+' MIN. 5' o °N� VEHICLE ID HANDICAP PARKING ANCHORING PINS AS REQUIRED SPACE ON CENTER PARR�LAN 00 MIN. AERJPLAN MIN. U STRIPE REQUIRED SIGN, 12"X18'; OR 8" MIN. LOW PERMEABLE SOIL PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP � HANDICAP SIGN UP TO $200 FINE PER LOCAL CODE CONCRETE MODULAR U. CENTERED AT HEAD FOR VIOLATION BLOCK CURB FACE OR RAMP LANDING OF SPACE ON CEN TER HANDICAP VAN -III-1 I I -I I r GUTTER 5'-4" MIN. 4' MIN. ACCESSIBLE PARKING " =III=III 1" - 1 1/4" STRIPE VAN FILTER FABRIC II. 59 APPROACH ___ _______ SIGN, 12"X6'; OR PER SLOPE MAX I_T HANDICAP PARKING ACCESSIBLE LOCAL CODE, II 8 FINISHED GRADE _ RETAINED SOIL (� RAMP 8.339' RAMP ACCESS AISLE WITH AS APPLICABLE 7) - SEE NOTE #4 MAX. SLOPE NO PAINTED 12" HIGH _ o = __ HANDICAP �. (PARKING UNIT DRAINAGE FILL 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT CONCRETE WALK uV LETTERING OF 'NO SIGN IEE (3/4" CRUSHED III III -III III -III III III III-ISI-1�1- FILLER MATERIAL SECTION A -A PARKING" CENTERED _ NOTE.' SEE PLAN FOR TOWARD DRIVE AISLE o ROCK OR STONE) III IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1lIElIIIIIIIIIIIIII=III=IIllll-' 6" HEIGHT MAX. SIDE FLARE ROUND ALL SLOPED 5 111=l - PARKING LAYOUT =111= :I I -111-III-111- I , - 10Z MAX. SLOPE INTERSECTIONS APPROXIMATE LIMITS UNREINFORCED CONCRETE OR 4" WIDE PAINTED 10" DIAMETER CENTER OF EXCAVATION CRUSHED STONE LEVELING PAD 5' MIN. 4' MIN. 5' MIN.n STR/P/NG, 45 DEGREE SYMBOL IN PARKING °NiravJJJd CROSS HATCH STALL, ALL LINES 4" PERFORATED PVC DRAINAGE TILE NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO SIDE FLARE RAMP SIDE FLARE R-1 ON, \ ® PATTERN AT 2' O.C. NOTES: ELEVATION OF RAMP TO BE 5" WIDE. WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC, FOUNDATION SOIL PROVIDE ENGINEERING AND • AT ACCESS AISLE TO DAYLIGHT OR STORM SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS IF WALL IS 1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS. 2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48" LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT -GRADE CROSSING. 3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH. 5. RAMP AND FLARED SIDE SURFACE TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH. 6. LANDING AND RAMP AREA IS CONSIDERED AS CONCRETE WALK, AND TRUNCATED DOME AREA IS INCIDENTAL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. LAST REVISED. Westwood PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP o' 31 12 SI09-CP Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. FACE OF CURB N AS REQUIRED GREATER THAN 4 FEET TALL. SIDEWALK CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT WALL BLOCK TYPE, SIZE, AND COLOR I FOR APPROVAL. �- HANDICAP SIGN NOTE: STRIPING TO CENTERED AT HEAD MATCH PARKING, OF SPACE, 2' MIN. UNLESS PER LOCAL AND 8' MAX. FROM CODE FACE OF CURB HANDICAP HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL Westwood HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under ffie laws of the State of Minnesota %R,>L Ryan K Bluhm Dabs 03/20/18 License No. 41257 Reviskmic 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans "ll, / 67.5° LAST REVISED: 0L/9 16 S115 -C LAST REVISED: Westwood MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL o3 31 10 S134 -C PUB �e& RMB Drawn: SYE Record Drawing by/date: 20' TRENCH DRAIN RE=1016.90 TRENCH DRAIN Prepared for: Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 LAST REVISED: 021915 Westwood STXX PAVEMENT SECTIONS Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota LAST REVISED: 11/03/15 S119 0011740DTP01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet•. 8 of 13 Civil Details N SLOPE , 12" STM a a • °° < a 2" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" MnDOT TYPE SPNWA330E BASE COURSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 10" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE 12" SELECT GRANULAR SUBBASE BUILDING FACE NEENAH R -4990 -CX COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR) TYPE C GRATE REFER TO GE07EC77VICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. MAX -3/16" GAP BITUMINOUS PAVENEW SECTION 42" 12" 42" SLOPE SLOPE d ° d 10" d a � 12" STM EL. VARIES a ° m CONC. PAVING CROSS SECTION TRENCH DRAIN Prepared for: Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 LAST REVISED: 021915 Westwood STXX PAVEMENT SECTIONS Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota LAST REVISED: 11/03/15 S119 0011740DTP01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet•. 8 of 13 Civil Details o 2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. sro 19sro 1 GAS 102D PON POH 0 10 2 6 —�-� Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my Revisions. direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 08/07/17 – City Comments 03/20/18 – Final Development Approval Plans Nicholas Meyer, PLA Date 03/20/18 License No. 53774 IUcfLl / Designed: SAR Checked: NPM Drawn: SAR Record Drawing by/date: Prepared for: \ \ 1025 41 10 10� 1014 OI Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Tree Inventory TREE TAG SPECIES SIZE (DBH) TREE NOTES STATUS 5001 Norway Spruce 8 SAVED 5002 Norway Spruce 11 SAVED 5003 Cottonwood 8 REMOVE 5004 Boxelder 6 REMOVE 5005 Cottonwood 28 REMOVE 5006 Cottonwood 13 REMOVE 5007 Cottonwood 12 REMOVE 5008 Cottonwood 26 REMOVE 5009 Cottonwood 24 Multi -Stem REMOVE 5010 Bitternut Hickory 6 REMOVE 5011 Boxelder 19 Multi -Stem REMOVE 5012 Cottonwood 7 REMOVE 5013 Cottonwood 6 REMOVE 5014 Cottonwood 8 REMOVE 5015 Norway Spruce 20 REMOVE 5016 Sugar Maple 44 REMOVE 5017 Cottonwood 9 REMOVE 5018 American Elm 11 REMOVE 5019 Boxelder 11 Multi -Stem REMOVE 5020 Sugar Maple 16 REMOVE 5021 Boxelder 6 REMOVE 5022 Boxelder 9 REMOVE 5023 Boxelder 10 REMOVE 5024 Cottonwood 10 REMOVE 5025 Boxelder 22 Multi -Stem REMOVE 5026 Boxelder 18 REMOVE 5027 Boxelder 14 Phy. Dam. REMOVE 5028 Boxelder 26 REMOVE 5029 Cottonwood 14 REMOVE 5030 Douglas Fir 5 REMOVE 5031 Douglas Fir 5 REMOVE 5032 White Pine 10 REMOVE 5033 Douglas Fir 4 REMOVE 5034 Norway Spruce 6 REMOVE 5035 Norway Spruce 9 REMOVE 5036 Norway Spruce 5 REMOVE 5037 Norway Spruce 5 REMOVE 5038 Norway Spruce 5 REMOVE 5039 Norway Spruce 6 REMOVE 5040 Norway Spruce 4 REMOVE 5041 White Pine 8 REMOVE 5042 Cottonwood 8 Multi -Stem REMOVE 5043 Cottonwood 10 Multi -Stem REMOVE Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0' 30' 60' 90' Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 0011740TPPOl.dwg Date: 3/9/18 Sheet: 9 of 13 Tree Inventory o 2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. STO 1°24� / / \ Planting Notes 0 10�� 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO SAN7:7 S — �a� �aINSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. SAN —� \ WAr WA WA WA WA WA WA WA cN \ \ 7025 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 1 PRE 4 PRE SAN WA r D o ro sro 2° A oz WA — ` 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. sro y sr ti Ar NV 4_ a \ \ 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE 3 BHS : 102 s s �qT \ CONTRACTOR. FIELD SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. + + \— — _ �— — � — �► — � — — — — — — — — — — — — — �a ° a o 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR STo--: yqT ` OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON \ ► ► _ PLANTING. SKH — 1 PRE ------ 3 NO s► STD wqT 6. AT TIME OF PLANTING ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA -GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED L2 — BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ST \ ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, OPEN WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ABM 6 SS 1 ° ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. a 691 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. � 2 ,ABM ____� ------ - \ ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. 77 �7 i : 00000000 6 JTL 1 CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. I,---- - -_\1 \ \ 3 BHS \ ® a 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. • I T T f \ 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. o� 1 e X22 I X020 10. AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION, TWINE AND TOP OF BURLAP MAY BE LEFT ON FOR INITIAL YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION ONLY IF BIODEGRADABLE TWINE AND BURLAP ARE USED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TWINE AND BURLAP DEGRADATION AFTER ONE YEAR PERIOD AND REMOVE ANY REMNANT MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. I ; . + + 2 ABM I o - 11. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. `........ + a I 12. REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. V ; i i : i 5 WHP ) f7070, ti 13. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. / 14. STAKING OF TREES IS OPTIONAL AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION; REPOSITION AND PLUMB IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. NON -PLUMB TREES TO BE SUBJECT l /) TO WARRANTY REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY I I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. I I J. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE NATIVE TOP SOIL FROM SITE I FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4 DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL -- 025 : i I I I LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. — I I 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4 DEPTH OF SHREDDED 10 \ Z I g ' I I HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS D SHALL HAVE 2 DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER CD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ► 02 I o I J ti I d SKH o I I 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE GAS J �I I PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS I I 1 TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V -SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE,dd7, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). • ..a •, , a e y a y.a . ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED EXCEPT POND AREAS AND WETLAND BUFFERS (SEE GRADING PLAN / EROSION CONTROL). SOD TO BE STANDARD O 00-9000�0�0 a . • _I�i - DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. \ I o \ MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE SLOPES OF 3.1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. ' • � PARKIN �• � \ I �\o s o 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ►► ►►— \ 2 SKH 'STO I OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. LAWN SPRINKLERS/IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL ALL HAVE RAIN SENSORS TO LIMIT ►► —o — ti — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —!►— — — — — — _ ►it — — — — — — —UNNECESSARY WATERING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR TO sro l — — \ WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. sro sro - sro sro -- 1 fill \ \ °�g 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. + - + + + o2p OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. x x x X + + + \ 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. UA GAS GAS (4) t — POH POH POH �POH POH p ROH GAS A GAS GA POH off POH GAS 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. L A POH POH POH POH POH p FY4 NOP � FYL 4 NOP �020� 1 FYL 2 SWO 4 BHS - _ X1023 23 1022- 3 NOS 1 -1021 X Final Plant Schedule Landscape Requirements WHP 5 White Pine / Pinus strobus 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN H 50'-80' W 30'-40' NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my RevlBiOne direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 08/07/17 — City Comments 03/20/18 — Final Development Approval Plans Nicholas Meyer, PLA Dab~ 03/20/18 License No. 53774 TOTAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 41 TREES * OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES 41 TREES - THE GREATER OF ONE TREE PER 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING TREES FOOTPRINT OR ONE TREE PER 40 LINEAL FEET OF SITE PERIMETER. 38 (BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 39,978 SQUARE FEET) * ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. MATURE SIZE ABM 6 Blaze Maple / Acer x freemanii 'Jeffersred' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN (SITE PERIMETER = 1,607 LINEAL FEET) H 50'-60' W 40' SWO 3 Swamp White Oak / Quercus bicolor 2.5" BB AS SHOWN H 50'-60' W 40'-50' FYL 5 Frontyard Linden / Tilia americana 'Frontyard' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN H 60'-70' W 30'-40' PRE 6 Princeton Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN H 60' W 40' SKH 6 Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN H 50' W 30'-35' JTL 6 Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 6' HT., BB CLUMP AS SHOWN H 25'-30' W 20'-25' SSC 6 Spring Snow Crab / Malus 'Spring Snow' 2" BB AS SHOWN H 25'-30' W 15-20' BHS 14 Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densato 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN H 30'-40' W 20'-30' NOS 8 Norway Spruce / Picea abies 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN H 60'-80' W 25-30' NOP 11 Norway Pine / Pinus resinoso 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN H 50'-80' W 30'-40' WHP 5 White Pine / Pinus strobus 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN H 50'-80' W 30'-40' NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my RevlBiOne direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 08/07/17 — City Comments 03/20/18 — Final Development Approval Plans Nicholas Meyer, PLA Dab~ 03/20/18 License No. 53774 TOTAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 41 TREES * OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES 41 TREES - THE GREATER OF ONE TREE PER 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING TREES FOOTPRINT OR ONE TREE PER 40 LINEAL FEET OF SITE PERIMETER. 38 (BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 39,978 SQUARE FEET) * ORNAMENTAL TREES (SITE PERIMETER = 1,607 LINEAL FEET) TREES * CONIFEROUS TREES 13 TREES - MIN. 30% OF REQUIRED OVERSTORY TREES MUST BE CONIFEROUS * UNDERSTORY SHRUBS 134 SHRUBS - THE GREATER OF ONE SHRUB PER 300 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT OR ONE SHRUB PER 30 LINEAL FEET OF SITE PERIMETER. (BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 39,978 SQUARE FEET) (SITE PERIMETER = 1,607 LINEAL FEET) Landscape Provisions TOTAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 76 TREES * OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES 26 TREES * CONIFEROUS TREES 38 TREES * ORNAMENTAL TREES 12 TREES * UNDERSTORY SHRUBS 229 SHRUBS NTM Prepared for: Checked: NTM Drawn: NTM Record Drawing by/date: Planting Legend (D DENOTES DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE DENOTES EVERGREEN TREE DENOTES ORNAMENTAL TREE Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0' 30' 60' 90' Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 0011740PLP01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet- 10 OF 13 Landscape Plan o 2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND �e (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. o BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) °` ga BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS a gip° ao�a EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND aP a �a OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SEC URE ° TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, II 2X BALI I OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE DIAMETER AGAINST TRUNK. 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. _ _FORM III—III III =BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED I I' I I II111- BACKFILL solL. I II I II SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. III III- REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR — =III—i III— NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. Westwood DECIDUOUS TREE C1 LA28 / C-*.- -- - 'A -4-L, —, 1AI-4.----' PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED d� WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS ° ! ° SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. 2 BA DIA FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH — SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD III -III— �I-I1— FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. Westwood EVERGREEN TREE LA29 PLANTING REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL o ® GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE. o p ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC. o EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. III III 111HIM F —I —— = — SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF . — —I - HOLE. 1- I I'' I—III— —III—III_ —III -1-11' BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. N.T.S. Westwood SHRUB PLANTING LA27 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. STO ST WA T WA T WA r STo STO �sro� 4 Redwing Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'J.N. Select' #5 CONT. Final Plant Schedule - CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. o 0 4'-0" Ruby Stella Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Ruby Stella' O.C. 7 TEA 22 Techny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' #7 CONT. 5'-0" O.C. #5 TAY 64 Taunton Yew / Taxus x media 'Taunton' #7 CONT. 4'-0" O.C. —SAN— —SAN _ SAN SAN —WAT WA T— WAr WAT WA WA WA WAT a a s�o �——a— ° STO ST ° ° a sro a a 4 sro RWV 4 Redwing Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'J.N. Select' #5 CONT. 6'-0" O.C. ABH 59 Incrediball Hydragea / Hydrangea arborescens 'Abetwo' #5 CONT. 4'-0" Ruby Stella Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Ruby Stella' O.C. 18" 20 Summer Wine Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Seward' #5 CONT. 4'-0" O.C. O.C. — SWN SA) LDN 9 Little Devil Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' #5 CONT. 3'-0" O.C. A U10 C1 A- 4-L,,-, , \AI -4.---- / C-*.- -- - 'A -4-L, —, 1AI-4.----' 11C /InAI-r " n" n r, KFG 131 Karl Forester Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Forester' #1 CONT. 36" O.C. LBS 49 Blue Heaven Little Bluestem / Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' #1 CONT. 24" O.C. SDO 191 Ruby Stella Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Ruby Stella' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. AFS 66 Autumn Fire Sedum / Sedum x 'Autumn Fire' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. 102� NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. I• I• .I . 16 FS I I . + +\STo a \ \ d 'STO D 29 SDO ►► — — — G�--- — -- — — — — — 22 3 TAY 7 AWS ` ►►� , \\ Sro � 8 KFG 3 TAY ► ° a 4 A ►. °° \ 5 T Y NIN tld i ON 00000 5 BH ' I 4 TEA + + I T + I I+ I a T I+ 5 TAY 2 ABH \ + I I 3 TAY i d ti d° i \ I I + i �o� 15 LBS 15 LBS CD 5 ABH 2 ABH I 7 TAY i I i a `$ 17 AFS I I 17 AFS i` . I ji 106 5 ABH i 5 AWS 41 21 SDO i 21 SDO ° a i 2 TEA ��2� I /I I 8KFG 8KFG I i0 I I 11 AWS ° ° m °a ° da ° d" 1 23 I + + +I o■ °■ I` 3 TAY (I �--- —--- I I O I + .O 0•' ° 4 KFG x x x x 00 000 l I ;. O I 7 AWS 7 AWS I 0' I 10e 9 FG I — —� i i• 0 O I OI I I J J / ;\_ I 4 RWV 5 TAY i — ------ a° ---I ABH I 2 TEA 8 KFG 3 TEA ------------ � + � �-- � 10 AB OOOOQ 00� — — ---- o— I I d � 6 T�' I I a +� I d + +I I I I I 3 TEA + I 5 T 'Y i 7 AWS 5 TAY I la 2 TAY 2 TEA 8 KFG I I ° 8 KFG I I I —1025 -- O WN I 102 / 1 7 AWS 0' (� O I d I 1 0 I / / 6 WN i 0 --- ° \ / N 3 ABH I ° + as 10e L 2 TEA 42 SDO da g 5 T to i 2 TEA 5 ABH 8 KFG 4 TAY 5 SWN I I ► ►1 I � I 9 LDN 2 ABH i 5 KING ' �A' I \ / 8 KFG � ° O5 ABH I I I4 VN 3 T Y 1 sro + _ r — ` • / ° ° a d a d ----- -+ -+ - + ------ / O Td Oda. � 7 I \ � l lo�� •� — �4• a a °� ° ad°° a ° a d d 0° �16 FG 4, d a ° a ° d a d I a ° ° A d a ° d° d � I ARKIN 33 KFG 1030 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — S S To sro sro 1027 026 X X X X X X X X �,;� X + — GAS GAS GAS qS qS X GAS POH POH POH � POH POH 27 O O ("�� i4 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my RevlBiOne direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 08/07/17 — City Comments 03/20/18 — Final Development Approval Plans Nicholas Meyer, PLA Dab~ 03/20/18 Licenae Na 53774 GA GAS GA S POH Po A DedxnedL N7U Prepared for: Checked- NTM Drawn: NTM Record Drawing by/date: GAS GAS H POH REM .�1'• GAS GAS POH po� POH,..� \ • • 7 -, n OH Orono • - • Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Housing Orono, Minnesota 0' 20' 40' 60' Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance 0011740PLP01.dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet- 11 of 13 Landscape Plan ©2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. SWPPP NARRATIVE THE SWPPP IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REGULATIONS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT. THIS REPORT SHALL BE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER MUST ALSO KEEP THIS SWPPP ON FILE FOR THREE YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. THE FOLLOWING ARE OUTLINED IN THIS SWPPP: - CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION - CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION - INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR ORONO SENIOR HOUSING SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SWPPP. PROJECT LOCATION THIS DOCUMENT PRESENTS A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR ORONO SENIOR HOUSING IN ORONO, MINNESOTA. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE BETWEEN KELLEY PARKWAY AND WAYZATA BVLD W, THE 3RD PARCEL EAST OF N. OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD. OWNER/OPERATOR INFORMATION ORONO SENIOR HOUSING IS OWNED BY APEX HOLDINGS LLC, 2110 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE C, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405. ORONO SENIOR HOUSING IS OPERATED BY TBD. OWNER/OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES OWNER -DEVELOPMENT OF SWPPP PRIOR TO APPLICATION/NOI SUBMITTAL. -SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE APPLICATION FORM (NOI) -COMPLIANCE W/ ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT -SWPPP SUBMITTAL FOR 30 REVIEW FOR PROTECT GREATER THAN 50 ACRES & DISCHARGING TO SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN 1 MILE OF SITE DISCHARGE. -KEEPING PERMIT COVERAGE UP-TO-DATE (TRANSFER/SUBDIVISION) (PART II.B.5) -NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETING NPDES REQUIREMENTS & COMPLETING ACTIVITY ON SITE. -IDENTIFY WHO HAS LONG TERM 0&M PERMANENT STORMWATER SYSTEM. -DEVELOP CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH ALL OPERATORS TO ENSURE NPDES COMPLIANCE. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CHEMICALS AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT LOCATION CONTROL MEASURE ANTIFREEZE DIESEL FUEL FERTILIZER VARIOUS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DRIP PAN VARIOUS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DRIP PAN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IN EQUIPMENT FUELING AREA SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SECONDARY CONTAINMENT / DRIP PAN GASOLINE GLUE ADHESIVES CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT HYDRAULIC OILS FLUIDS CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PAINTS CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT GREASE CONTRACTOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DRIP PAN SANITARY WASTE PORTABLE BATHROOMS SERVICE PROVIDER TO SECURE UNITS FROM TIPPING OVER AND MAINTAINED SOIL AMENDMENTS VARIOUS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT LANDSCAPING MATERIALS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT WASHOUT AREA CONCRETE MORTAR MOBILE MIXER S.C. WASHOUT AREA ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS OBTAINED AND DISCHARGE WATER WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT OR CONSTRUCTION NOTES IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR MAINTAIN A STOCKPILE OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR IMMEDIATE USAGE. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SEDIMENT DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE STATE, OR ANY DISCHARGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL OF REPORTABLE QUANTITY, CONTACT THE MPCA STATE DUTY OFFICER AT 1-800-422-0798. TIMING OF BMP INSTALLATION THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED (PART II.C.) SURFACES AND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. THE FOLLOWING LIST DEFINES THE TIMING OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN SPECIFIC AREAS. OPERATOR -RESPONSIBLE FOR PARTS II.B., II.C., IV. & APPENDIX A, PART C. IF APPLICABLE. (JOINTLY WITH OWNER) -COMPLETE AND SIGN APPLICATIONS FOR PERMIT TRANSFER AND MODIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH OWNER AS NEEDED, THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY PERSONNEL KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED (TRAINED PERSONNEL) IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S WHO WILL OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION WILL BE INCLUDED WITH THE ON-SITE SWPPP WORKBOOK AND DOCUMENTATION. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 3.50 ACRES. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, GRADING, UTILITIES, CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI -STORY BUILDING WITH AN APPROXIMATE 40,000 SQ FOOTPRINT, AND LANDSCAPING. PRE -DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS THE EXISTING SITE IS AN UNDEVELOPED FIELD. THE SITE HAS A SLIGHT SLOPE FROM WEST TO EAST WITH SOIL STOCKPILES AT A FEW LOCATIONS. POST -DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS THE PROPOSED SITE WILL CONSIST OF A MULTI -STORY BUILDING, WITH ASSOCIATED DRIVE LANES AND PARKING. PERVIOUS AREAS WILL BE VEGETATED. DRAINAGE WILL BE COLLECTED VIA SITE STORM SEWER WHICH WILL DISCHARGE TO AN EXISTING REGIONAL POND TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. THE POND WAS DESIGNED TO HANDLE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. LAND FEATURE CHANGES THE DISTURBED AREA IS 3.5 ACRES. EXISTING SITE IS 100% PERVIOUS. THE PROPOSED SITE IS 62.6 % IMPERVIOUS THE NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 2.19 ACRE. IMPAIRED WATERS THERE IS ONE IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN 1 (ONE) MILE OF THE PROJECT SITE DISCHARGE LOCATIONS) AS INDICATED ON THE PCA IMPAIRED WATERS MAP. LONG LAKE IS IMPAIRED FOR MERCURY IN FISH TISSUE AND NUTRIENT/EUTHROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS, AND IS LOCATED 5215' EAST OF THE PROJECT SITE. SPECIAL WATERS THERE ARE NO SPECIAL WATERS WITHIN 1 (ONE) MILE OF THE PROJECT SITE DISCHARGE LOCATIONS) AS INDICATED ON THE PCA SPECIAL WATERS MAP. SOIL TYPES THE SITE CONTAINS 1.5 TO 4' THICK LAYER OF TOPSOIL, OVERLAYING FILL AND DEPOSITS CONSISTING MAINLY OF CLAYEY SAND AND LEAN CLAY. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED 01/18/2018 completed by BRAUN INTERTEC. THE SOILS HAVE SLIGHT EROSION POTENTIAL. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL CONSIST OF THE EXISTING WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN CONSTRUCTED EAST OF THE PROJECT. THE POND WAS DESIGNED FOR MNDOT HIGHWAY WORK AND A FEW AREA DEVELOPMENTS. THE DESIGN POND STORAGE IS 14.2 ACRE-FEET. EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PREVENTION MEASURES TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ALONG WITH THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED TO ESTABLISHED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY FOR SITE CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, AND WITHIN THE PROJECT STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT PERMANENT TURF SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS PER NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE GRADING AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN. SEEDING THAT IS TO OCCUR AFTER OCTOBER 20TH SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DORMANT SEEDING PER THE MN/DOT SEEDING MANUAL 2007. POTENTIAL STORM WATER POLLUTANTS POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT ARE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE, ARE DESCRIBED IN THE SECTION. BY IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE BMPS, THE POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ARE NOT REASONABLY EXPECTED TO AFFECT THE STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota Ryan U Bluhm Data 03/20/18 Ucense No. 41257 PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION: 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND THE PERIMETER OF AREAS TO BE GRADED AND ALL AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 2. CONSTRUCT GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AT FIELD ENTRANCES TO THE SITE AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 3. INLET PROTECTION IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM WATER INLETS WHICH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO RECEIVE STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHIN 200 FEET OF LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES. ALL SILT FENCES FOR STOCKPILES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO GRADING CONTRACT IF STOCKPILES ARE PLACED OUTSIDE OF SILT FENCES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 1. PHASE GRADING WORK TO MINIMIZE THE DURATION THAT ANY DISTURBED SOIL IS EXPOSED. 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER OVER EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IF NOT BEING ACTIVELY GRADED AND/OR IF NOT AT FINAL GRADE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASING. TEMPORARY SEED MIX 150, APPLIED AT A RATE OF 40 LBS/ACRE, SHALL BE USED PRIOR TO WINTER, IF SITE NOT SODDED. 3. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REPLACEMENT OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL OVER TURF AREAS WHEN GRADING IS COMPLETE. 4. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 2 TONS/ACRE OF STRAW ON ALL AREAS AFTER REACHING FINAL GRADE WITH TOPSOIL AND ANCHOR STRAW WITH EITHER A STRAIGHT DISK, HYDROMULCH OR POLYMER. 5. STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING THE DRAINAGE DITCH TO ANY CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS. THE FIRST 200 LINEAR FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. THE REMAINING DITCH SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. 6. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES WHICH ARE NOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OR OTHER PERIMETER CONTROLS. 7. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO BUT NO SOONER THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE APRON IS INSTALLED. RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER APRON LIP ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD DETAIL. 8. SUFFICIENT PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS SHALL BE MOBILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A WRITTEN ORDER BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO CONDUCT CORRECTIVE WORK AND INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL WORK IN THE CASE OF AN EMERGENCY. 9. REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS AT THE END OF THE DAY OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTION, OR MORE FREQUENT AT DIRECTION OF SITE INSPECTOR. 10. COLLECT ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IN DUMPSTERS AND ROLL -OFF BOXES, EMPTY WHEN DEBRIS REACHES TOP OF DUMPSTER 11. INSPECT POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED WITHIN PART IV.F OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 12. REPAIR SILT FENCES, INLET PROTECTION, GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AS NEEDED AND AS DEFINED IN THE PART IV.E.4 INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP REMOVAL IF INLET SEDIMENT CONTROLS (WIMCO TYPE OR EQUAL) BMPS ARE REMOVED FOR FLOODING / FREEZING CONCERNS UPON REQUEST OF THE MUNICIPALITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR OTHER AGENCY, DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE INSPECTION REPORTS AND THIS SWPPP OR BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF REQUEST. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE A WRITTEN FORM OF CORRESPONDENCE VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHOUT PERMANENT IMPERMEABLE SURFACES WILL BE VEGETATED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION. IF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS NOT REQUIRED, THE SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 250 APPLIED AT 70 LBS/ACRE AND TYPE -1 MULCH APPLIED AT 2 TONS/ACRE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 2575. 2. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE, INLET PROTECTION AND OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER VEGETATION IS 70% ESTABLISHED BY UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION COVER OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. REPAIR ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING REMOVAL OF BMPS. 3. CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. THE CLEAN OUT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 4. THE ORIGINAL PERMITTEES (OWNER AND OPERATOR) WHO HOLD THE NPDES PERMIT MUST SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE. Rens: 08/07/17 - City Comments 03/20/18 - Final Development Approval Plans Designed: RMB Checked: RMB Drawn: SYS Record Drawing by/date A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) CAN BE APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IF ALL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: 1. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS 2. AT LEAST 90% BY AREA, OF ALL ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED ON THOSE AREAS. 3. ON AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE, PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. SWPPP INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A TRAINED AND QUALIFIED PERSON EVERY SEVEN DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT EXCEEDING 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. THE OWNER OR AN ALTERNATE WILL CONDUCT THE INSPECTIONS AS SPECIFIED IN THIS SWPPP. ALTERNATES WILL INCLUDE INDIVIDUALS TO BE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER AND MAY INCLUDE CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL OR OTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS AND SHALL BE LISTED IN THE PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION SECTION OF THIS REPORT. FOLLOWING A RAIN EVENT INSPECTION, THE NEXT ROUTINE (WEEKLY) INSPECTION WILL TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS. THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING EACH INSPECTION: 1. RECORD DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION 2. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTION 3. RECORD RAINFALL RECORDS SINCE MOST RECENT INSPECTION 4. INSPECT THE SITE FOR EXCESS EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION 5. INSPECT SITE FOR DEBRIS, TRASH AND SPILLS 6. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DEVICES 7. INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES FOR SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED STREETS. 8. INSPECT THE ADJACENT STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER FOR SEDIMENT, LITTER, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. 9. INSPECT SITE RUNOFF OUTFALL OR DISCHARGE AREAS 10. RECORD FINDINGS OF INSPECTION, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 11. RECORD CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES) 12. RECORD CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.5 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT 13. THE SITE INSPECTOR WILL VISUALLY CHECK A DISCHARGE FROM A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS OBTAINED AND DISCHARGE WATER WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT OR OTHER NUISANCE CONDITIONS. MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SITE. THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE IF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR REPLACEMENT: 1. IF SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCE ARE FILLED TO 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE CONTROL DEVICE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. 2. IF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES APPEAR PLUGGED WITH SEDIMENT, ARE FILLED TO 1/3 CAPACITY, OR HAVE STANDING WATER AROUND THEM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE SEDIMENT AND CLEAN OR REPLACE THE FILTER WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. 3. IF THE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES ARE FILLED WITH SEDIMENT OR OTHERWISE FAILING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EITHER REPLACE THE ENTRANCE OR ADD ADDITIONAL GRAVEL WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. 4. IF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE IS OBSERVED ON PAVED ADJACENT STREETS OR OTHER PROPERTIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. 5. IF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE IS OBSERVED ON ADJACENT STREETS, IN SURFACE WATERS OR OTHER PROPERTIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY THE SOURCE AND DISCHARGE LOCATION OF THE SEDIMENT AND IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THOSE LOCATIONS TO PREVENT FUTURE DISCHARGES. (additional controls and information is described within the "SWPPP Notes" plan sheet) SEDIMENT MUST BE RETRIEVED WITHIN 7 DAYS FROM SURFACE WATERS UNLESS ADDITIONAL REGULATORY APPROVAL IS NEEDED. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK TO REMOVE SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE. 6. IF TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS APPEAR PLUGGED WITH SEDIMENT, OR FILLED TO 1/2 CAPACITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DRAIN THE BASIN AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. 7. IF EXCESSIVE SEDIMENTS OR DEBRIS ARE OBSERVED AT THE FLARED END SECTION OUTFALLS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE SOURCE AND DISCHARGE LOCATIONS OF SUCH MATERIALS. IF THE DISCHARGE HAS OCCURRED ON THE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE SEDIMENTS AND DEBRIS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION AND CORRECT THE SOURCE OF SUCH MATERIALS. 8. IF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE IS OBSERVED TO BE DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE, THE MPCA WILL BE NOTIFIED THE SAME DAY. AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION, THE RATE OF INSPECTIONS OF THE STABILIZED AREAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE A MONTH IN AREAS WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION IS ACTIVE AND 70% DENSITY VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. MONTHLY INSPECTIONS TAKING PLACE WHERE AREAS OF THE SITE OR THE ENTIRE SITE ARE STABILIZED AND NON-ACTIVE WILL BE CEASED AFTER A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS IF THE SITE OR PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE NON-ACTIVE AND STABILIZED. INSPECTIONS WILL BE INITIATED ONCE AGAIN UPON CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BEGINNING OR UPON REQUEST FROM THE PCA OR THEIR APPOINTED INSPECTOR. INSPECTIONS WILL CEASE DURING FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS BUT WILL BEGIN AGAIN WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RUNOFF EVENT. Prepared for: Apex HLLC 2110 Lyndale Avenue South Suite C Minneapolis, MN 55405 Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 0011740SWP01. dwg Date: 06/19/17 sheet: 12 OF 13 SWPPP Narrative ©2018 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. SWPPP NOTES Listed below are additional BMP's that may be considered for use if the BMP's identified in the erosion control plans prove to be insufficient. Payment for these BMP's may only be made if prior approval from an Owner has been given. 2. 3. 4. 5. A 7. STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION • STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREAS THAT COULD DISCHARGE TO AN INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. • • INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS OR APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGS ARE NOT IN PLACE. AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. • • INFRASAFE DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGS ARE IN PLACE AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. • DOCUMENTATION IS NEEDED WITHIN 72 HOURS IF REMOVAL OF PROTECTION BMPS IS NEEDED DUE TO WINTER CONDITIONS OR FLOODING CONCERNS. STOCKPILES (TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT) • LOCATE STOCKPILES A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM CATCH BASIN INLETS, PONDS, AND SITE DRAINAGE ROUTES • PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STOCKPILES IF NOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL. • • TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL BE USED TO STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES AND THE STOCKPILES SHALL BE SHAPED TO FACILITATE SEEDING AND MINIMIZE EROSION AND SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • • IF TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH CANNOT BE USED, THEN THE STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED WITH HYDROMULCH, TARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER. • IF STOCKPILES MUST BE PLACED WITHIN A CONVEYANCE A TEMPORARY BYPASS SHALL BE INSTALLED (I.E. PVC PIPE) TO ADEQUATELY CONVEY RUNOFF. TEMPORARY BYPASS BMPS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT UNLESS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE OWNER / ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING • DURING DEWATERING ACTIVITIES, THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER CANNOT BE DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TO SURFACE WATERS. OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE TURBIDITY OF THE WATER INCLUDE: (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT): o CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR TURBID WATER DISCHARGE. o USE A PORTABLE SEDIMENT TRAP SYSTEM. o APPLY NATURAL BASED FLOCCULENT TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS CHITOSAN IN SEDIMENT TRAPS OR A SERIES OF DITCH CHECKS TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT. o DISCHARGE THROUGH FIBER LOGS OR A ROCK WEEPER INTO A LARGE VEGETATIVE BUFFER AREA. o PUMP TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN. • ENERGY DISSIPATION WILL BE PROVIDED AT ALL DISCHARGE POINTS. • DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES WILL NOT CAUSE EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ADVERSELY IMPACT WETLANDS. • ALL EROSION CONTROL OR SEDIMENT TRAPS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIRING DEWATERING. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES • A TEMPORARY CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIP PAD SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE VEHICLES LEAVE THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. • THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE AT LEAST 50 FEET IN LENGTH. • GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE PLACED UNDER THE CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIPS TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MATERIAL. • ROCK PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ROCK 1 TO 3 INCHES IN SIZE AND PLACED IN 6 INCH LAYERS. • CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND MAINTAINED AS NEEDED. • TRACKED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PAVED SURFACES AT THE END OF EACH DAY USING PICK—UP TYPE STREET SWEEPER. • IF TRACKING INTO ROADWAY BECOMES PROBLEMATIC THE ENTRANCE PADS SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR ANOTHER TECHNIQUE APPLIED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MONITORED CLOSELY DURING WET CONDITIONS. IF TRACKING INTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS OCCURS, THE FREQUENCY OF STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE INCREASED. CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT • CONCRETE TRUCKS SHALL UTILIZE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO WASH AND RINSE THEIR EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE. • WASHOUT OF CONCRETE MIXER TRUCKS WILL BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ONLY. • WASHOUTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND CONCRETE WASTE GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS. • WASHOUTS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED ON SITE WITH SIGNAGE BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR WITH APPROVAL FROM OWNER. • WASHOUTS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND WATERCOURSES. • CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL. • IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLYLINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER. • WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE • ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL OCCUR IN STAGING AREAS ONLY. • VEHICLE WASHING SHOULD BE AVOIDED. IF WASHING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING WILL BE CONTAINED AND LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. • ENGINE DEGREASING SHALL BE AVOIDED. IF DEGREASING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THE OPERATION WILL BE CONTAINED IN A LINED SEDIMENT TRAP AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AT A TREATMENT FACILITY. • ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENT TRAPS AND CONTAINMENT FACILITIES AND PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASH WATER/DEGREASING AT A TREATMENT FACILITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. FUELING • ANY FUEL TANK OR TRUCK STORED ON THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. • FUELING AREAS SHALL NOT BE WASHED OR RINSED WITH WATER SINCE THIS COULD CAUSE FUEL SPILLS TO BE DISCHARGED INTO STORM WATER SYSTEMS. • ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANING UP SMALL SPILLS. • ALL REQUIRED FUEL CONTAINMENT AND CLEAN—UP MATERIALS AND THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF THE MATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 8. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED TO PREVENT VANDALISM OR UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS. • CONTAINMENT UNITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. • MPCA STORING AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE. • NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHOULD BE STORED WITHIN 200 FEET OF AN IDENTIFIED CRITICAL AREA. • ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CONTRACTOR ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANING UP SMALL SPILLS. • IF BUILDING MATERIALS, CHEMICALS, OR GENERAL REFUSE IS BEING USED, STORED, DISPOSED OF, OR OTHERWISE MANAGED INAPPROPRIATELY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CORRECT SUCH DEFECTS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION. • ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSAL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. 9. CHEMICAL CONTAINMENT • GASOLINE, OIL, PAINT, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER CHEMICALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CONTACT THE GROUND SURFACE, BE EXPOSED TO GROUNDWATER OR BE RELEASED TO A SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER EXCEPT IN DE MINIMIS QUANTITIES. • ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE KEPT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINER, WITH ORIGINAL LABELS STILL ATTACHED, UNLESS THE CONTAINER IS NOT RESEALABLE. • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE AREA AT THE END OF EACH DAY. • AN EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO STORE ONLY ENOUGH PRODUCTS TO DO THE REQUIRED JOB. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TANKS OR BARRELS TO COLLECT LIQUID BYPRODUCTS THAT POSE A POLLUTION HAZARD. • THE POLLUTANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. • ALL SPILLS SHALL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDED METHODS. • ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSAL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT • ALL STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE SECURED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS. 10. SOLID WASTE • SOLID WASTE SHALL BE STORED IN APPROPRIATE CONTAINERS AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ON A REGULAR BASIS. • CONTAINERS SHALL BE COVERED TO PREVENT WIND BLOWING THE WASTE AROUND THE SITE. • MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL SOLID WASTE. • SOLID WASTE STORAGE CONTAINERS AND PROPER DISPOSAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. 11. DUST CONTROL • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A VARIETY OF DUST CONTROL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A. RAPID STABILIZATION METHODS ON SLOPES B. WATER ON ROADWAYS AND GRADED AREAS C. ALTERNATIVES: IN THE FORM OF VEGETABLE POLYMERS, WATER AND CALCIUM CHLORIDE PETROLEUM EMULSION RESINS, OR ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS MAY ALSO BE USED. • ALL REQUIRED DUST CONTROL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 12. NON—STORMWATER DEWATERING • HYDRANT FLUSHING: FLUSHING OF HYDRANTS WILL BE DISCHARGED THROUGH TEMPORARY PIPES AS NECESSARY, ONTO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR TO STABILIZED AREAS WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE DISCHARGE POINT. THE DISCHARGE SHOULD BE COLLECTED BY THE STORM WATER BASINS AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM. • POTABLE WATER DISCHARGE: ALL WATER LINES WILL BE FLUSHED USING HOSES AND DISCHARGED ONTO AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE BY NON—EROSIVE MEANS. 13. WORK NEAR OR IN IMPAIRED WATERS • EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. • TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN NEEDED WITHIN AREAS 5 ACRE DISTURBANCE WITH COMMON POINT OF DISCHARGE. • IF WORK IS NEAR SPECIAL WATERS REFER TO APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. • NO UNTREATED DEWATERING WILL TAKE PLACE AND DISCHARGE TO "IMPAIRED WATERS" I hereby certify that thisIan was b me or under m direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL FM Prepared for: HLLC ENGINEER under he laws of the State of Minnesota 08/07/17 — City Comments Apex 03/20/18 — Final Development Approval Plans QIeckmh RMB Ryan M. Bluhm Drawn: SYs 2110 LY ndale Avenue South Suite C Dates 03/20/18 License No. 41257 Record Drawing by/date Minneapolis, MN 55405 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance TITLE COMPANY NAME CONTACT NUMBER OWNER CONTRACTOR SITE NPDES INSPECTOR ALTERNATE ENGINEER Westwood Professional Services GRETCHEN SCHROEDER 952-906-7480 STORM WATER INSPECTOR DUTY OFFICER STATE OF MN 1-800-422-0798 CITY ENGINEER CITY OF ORONO ADAM EDWARDS 952-249-4600 Orono Senior Housing Orono, Minnesota 0011740SWP01. dwg Date: 06/19/17 Sheet: 13 OF 13 SWPPP Notes ORONO SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITY, ORONO, MINNESOTA Orono Senior Housing Community, Orono, Minnesota bbbbil" LORI & ASSOCIATES a r c h i t e c t s 4633 1st Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55419 Tel- (612) 232-9539 Fax: (651) 305-6884 email:viren@gori-associates.com www.gori-associates.com Bid package 01/05/2018 (not for construction) Revisions: Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build ■ E E 0O U) O o O L L ® O U) O r 0L O 0 z E _ w O O- O La C ?� N O (/1 t o O 3 + O O - Q L 7 0 0 p t N 0 C:L-c L + L Q + O 0 0E.T�a)a' X c c T 1 C C N X T O a 7'U a-+ L X U N O- U O 7 X N � -- Architect: a -+Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 1st avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Title Sheet A 1,0 PROJECT #: 2017-01 0 n z O N (IO LLJ U Q Q KELLEY PARKWAY 12'x8' MONUMENT o SIGN 2 SIDED MONUMENT SIGN r— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----- — — — — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 45'-0" I I I I I I I I _ I I \ w� Q� I ww rm FT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LANDSCAPED BERM L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — SERVICE DRIVE FIRE LANE/ TRASH BIKE PATH ENCLOSURE � WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10, 11 I I ARKING 12 STALLS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- ------ SERVICE SERVICE DRIVE DRIVE z� o — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 2 L C LL L a IN r 1— C City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build E E O V i0 U) O o 0 L O O E� i O r O L O 0 z o ' �`° o amE000 z� Cn 3 o n O C > i 0.0 i X �oE.�°�°' x ° c ° U O Q d U z'� i U N O 3 X Q) dU ° E 7� N L U UU O U) a O °° m Z (n Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 1 st avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Site Plan A 2A PROJECT #: 2017-01 City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build ■ E E 0 V CF)co -I-,U) (j) 0 0O L 0 O ■ Cl) 0 r 0 L O 0 Z E a rn o cj:� CO o o_ N E o 0 0 z M 3 o n � +- C (!7 0 + O O d i O O O O O O ✓ i T N ,O .0 CD x O E .NO N O C C i T L C C N X Qx O O� O - U �� i O N O 0 X T Q N NQ) -O O O E +- Q. L .— +o m a'o 0 0 o to Z (n D Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 1st avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Lower Level Plan A 3,0 PROJECT #: 2017-01 1l I City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build ■ E E 0 V ca 00 0O L LM 0 O ■ U) 0 a 0 L 0 0 z O O+ CN o O Z O i C O 3 N 'C' O 3 L1 75 c ,� O d i G O O D w O E .L N x O C C U O- ".L)�� i -0U N U— U O x N —T + a) �U 0L E -0 L - 0 — V) a� a a (0 Z (n 0 Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 list avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG First Floor Plan A 11 PROJECT #: 2017-01 City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build ■ E E 0 V ca 00 0O L LM 0 O ■ U) 0 a 0 L 0 0 z O O+ CN o O Z O i C O 3 N 'C' O 3 L1 75 c ,� O d i G O O D w O E .L N x O C C U O- ".L)�� i -0U N U— U O x N O —�' "O' N a)'U Ca -U 0 L N L - 0 — V) a� a a (0 Z (n 0 Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 list avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Second Floor Plan A 12 PROJECT #: 2017-01 City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: Civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build ■ E E 0 V ca 00 0O L LM 0 O ■ U) 0 a 0 L 0 0 z O O+ CN o O Z O i C O 3 N 'C' O 3 L1 75 c ,� O d i G O O D w O E .L N x O C C U O- ".L)�� i -0U N U— U O x N O —�' "O' N a)'U Ca -U 0 L N L - 0 — V) a� a a (0 Z (n 0 Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 list avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Roof Plan A 3■3 PROJECT #: 2017-01 — — — C 5 5 Pon O O 5 z � � ■■ ■■ oto � ■■ ■■ � � ■■ Di � ■■ ■■ � m ■■ ■■���� ■■ ■■ � — ■■ ■■ — � O'G ■■ ■■ -A ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ �' ■■ ■■ � ■■ ■■ �.F�'C �. ■■ ■■ 1 � — ■■ ■■ — I ■■ ■■ 1 FIBER CEMENT BOARD LAP SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE: COLOR 1 7 ALUMINIUM RAILING: BLACK POWDERCOATED OR VINYL CLAD 2 FIBER CEMENT BOARD LAP SIDING, 8" EXPOSURE: COLOR 2 8 WHITE COLOR ED"7i= -WMDOWS 2A FIBER CEMENT BOARD VERTICAL SIDING, 12" EXPOSURE: ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ COLOR 3 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 3 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 10 ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 1" FIBER CEMENT TRIM BOARD/WINDOW HEADER @ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ — — � � � � � � � � — — TRIM SILL (BUFF/TAN OR AUTUMN BLEND) 13 EXTERIOR GRADE DOWNCAST WALL SCONCES. 6A 8" HIGH X21" THICK MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER ( ), 2 ( ) HEADER @ ALL STONE VENEER LOCATIONS 14 PREFINISHED METAL LOUVERS W/ SCREEN 6B 22"(HIGH)X4"(THICK) MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER M ■■ i � F F O r .FN ©SOUTH ELEVATION 01 0 1 "=12'-0" 5 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, 5/12 PITCH, TYPICAL EEO lam IIIII`1--------------2111 i i i moi —..r �, >`• �_ i �_ � ■■ L�� ��� - � J ■■ =11 ``IIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIJ`` �r ��a� ■■ ��a� ��� ■■ r ' �'a� ' � ■■ � � ��� I�Illllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllll � .®1e ■1 1. _ —�1 " �,�, �1�� � �� Q • -OS ll.BEARING •. e �� �� e _ �i i e �_©11■e �_� ■�e w.� � e—r—�_ � 1_e w•�_�1'�� 9 �•�_�11■�� 7 EXTERIOR F N SH LEGEND 1 FIBER CEMENT BOARD LAP SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE: COLOR 1 7 ALUMINIUM RAILING: BLACK POWDERCOATED OR VINYL CLAD 2 FIBER CEMENT BOARD LAP SIDING, 8" EXPOSURE: COLOR 2 8 WHITE COLOR ED"7i= -WMDOWS 2A FIBER CEMENT BOARD VERTICAL SIDING, 12" EXPOSURE: WHITE POWDERCOATED STOREFRONT DOOR / FRAME COLOR 3 9 SYSTEM WITH INTEGRAL GRILL AND FIXED LI TES AS 3 FIBER CEMENT BOARD FACIA / TRIM BOARD: SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. COLOR WHITE 10 WHITE COLORED FIBERGLASS DOORS WITH INTEGRAL 4 1" FIBER CEMENT TRIM BOARD/WINDOW HEADER @ GRILL. SIDING: COLOR 4 11 INSULATED HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME 5 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER WITH CEMENT BOARD 12 PREFINISHED GUTTER / SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT 6 TRIM SILL (BUFF/TAN OR AUTUMN BLEND) 13 EXTERIOR GRADE DOWNCAST WALL SCONCES. 6A 8" HIGH X21" THICK MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER ( ), 2 ( ) HEADER @ ALL STONE VENEER LOCATIONS 14 PREFINISHED METAL LOUVERS W/ SCREEN 6B 22"(HIGH)X4"(THICK) MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 'SILL' @ ALL STONE VENEER LOCATIONS City Submittal Package 03/20/18 Revisions: Not for construction Owner: Consultants: civil: Structural: Nelson Rudie and Associates Structural - Mechanical - lectrical Consulting Engineers 9100 49th Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55428 Tel: (763) 367-7600 Fax: (763) 367-7601 Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Build i E E 0 V 4-0O G 0 0 0 L 0 0 U) 0 i 0 L O a z E ° o z rN N NO m � -0- ca 3 +0°��0 L N O L s+ L C Q + O O C.7 X Na) X C >' � � C .0 � X v.°� a° >� x :3'U"J`� X -0.2 N U)O X L T � U°p,.V N ° N O N N '° U ° °i -� CL L . - L + ° ° U) 0 -o ° ° to Z (n 0 Architect: GORI & ASSOCIATES 4633 1st avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SG CHECKED BY: VG Exterior Elevations A 5.0 PROJECT #: 2017-01 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey Total (Square Feet) Example (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] % This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. April 9, 2018 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Site Plan Application #LA18-000034 2635 Kelley Parkway Engineering Review #1 Dear Adam: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1. The regional pond located directly adjacent to the east provides rate control for stormwater runoff from this parcel. However, due to rule changes since the pond's construction, stormwater management measures must be included to limit runoff volume and discharge of Total Suspend Solids and Total Phosphorus to that of existing conditions. The existing condition was modeled as approximately 50% meadow and 50% woods in the approved Stone Bay Stormwater Management Plan, dated September 5, 2002. A revised Stormwater Management Plan must be submitted accordingly. 2. Storm sewer calculations must be submitted to verify adequate sizing of drainage system. 3. A separate City permit must be obtained for the sanitary sewer and water connections. 4. The condition of the regional pond adjacent to the site must be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work. The pond bottom must be verified with survey prior to any work, and once work commences, the Contractor shall be responsible for removing any sediment added to the pond due to site construction. 5. The condition of Kelley Parkway and adjacent sidewalk must be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work and verified with video or pictures. Any damage to the street or sidewalk after work commences shall be deemed to be caused by the Contractor and the Owner's responsibility to repair. 6. All work within public right-of-way and connections to watermain must be coordinated with the City. Contractor must provide a minimum 48 hour prior notice. 7. All construction equipment must be parked on site. Clear drive lanes must be maintained on Kelley Parkway at all times. 8. Temporary barricades must be installed at the east entrance to direct traffic through the rock entrance until the site is permanently stabilized. 9. Drainage and Utility Easements must be revised to adequately cover utilities as follows: a. Watermain, hydrants, and valves (except private service lines) b. Stormwater management facilities used to meet governmental requirements 10. Per the resolution approving the Concept Plan, a 10' trail easement must be provided adjacent to the south lot line. H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-LA18-000034_2635 Kelley Parkway\2635KelleyPkwy-1_2018-04-09.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Site Plan Application #LA18-000034 2635 Kelley Parkway Page 2 11. Extent of removals at connections to existing pavement shall be coordinated in the field with the City prior to any work. Concrete sidewalk removal limits shall be located at a joint. 12. Pedestrian ramps must be provided on the sidewalk adjacent to Kelley Parkway at the connections to the driveway entrances. 13. The Grading Notes must be revised to indicate a minimum 6" topsoil replacement on disturbed green areas. 14. Retaining wall plans must be provided for review and approval prior to their construction. 15. A fence should be provided on walls 4' or greater in height, and details should be included accordingly. 16. Once the sanitary sewer stub is exposed and location, size, and elevation are field verified, layout and design of service connection must be submitted to City for review and approval prior to construction. 17. In order to limit potential for sewer blockages, a grinder pump should be included prior to connection to public sanitary sewer. 18. The hydrant on the south side of the building should be relocated to the south side of the fire lane to minimize potential for issues with falling walls during firefighting operations. 19. The final location of fire hydrants, valves, and fire connections must be reviewed by the Fire Chief. 20. Due to the short distance and drop in elevation, all joints between CBMH 102 and FES 101 should be tied. 21. FES 101 should be relocated to the NWL (+/-1009.0), and the incoming pipe should be installed with minimal slope to maintain the lowest velocity possible and minimize erosion potential. 22. Sump manholes should be included prior to connection to the regional pond or trunk sewer to limit potential transport of sediment to the regional stormwater management system. 23. Due to heavy soils in the area, the applicant should consider installing finger drains at low point inlets (per detail provided). 24. Riprap installed should be Class III per detail provided. Notes should be included accordingly. 25. Signs should be provided for manholes, gate valves, and flared -end sections in the area east of the retaining wall to mark utilities if grass is not mowed here (see Comment 26). 26. The final locations of trees should be coordinated to avoid conflict with utilities. The tree in the island north of the entrance appears to be in conflict with proposed storm sewer. 27. Native vegetation should be indicated in the area east of the retaining wall and adjacent to the regional pond to minimize the need for maintenance or mowing in this area. 28. The Contractor should be required to submit a Site Management Plan prior to work. The plan should outline concrete management, work that will require dewatering, and any other work requiring protective measures to minimize potential for negative environmental impact. 29. The Contractor should be required to submit a Traffic Control Plan prior to work. 30. The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted conditional to Final approval. 31. The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit (NPDES) to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than 1 acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 32. The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, and designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities. 33. Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-LA18-000034_2635 Kelley Parkway\2635KelleyPkwy-1_2018-04-09.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Site Plan Application #LA18-000034 2635 Kelley Parkway Page 3 If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. -(2c-64g "4 Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-LA18-000034_2635 Kelley Parkway\2635KelleyPkwy-1_2018-04-09.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. RUN DATE: 03/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: I 38 33-118-23 110062 38 33-118-23 110116 38 33-118-23 110126 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC HP MINNESOTA I LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2625 CASCADE LA 2632 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC HP MINNESOTA I LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC C/O WILLIAM HENNEY 180 N STETSON AVE #3650 16135 55TH AVE N 5101 THIMSEN AVE #200 CHICAGO IL 60601 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 MINNETONKA MN 55345 38 33-118-23 110066 38 33-118-23110117 38 33-118-23 11 0127 STONEBAY COMMUNITY ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2615 CASCADE LA 2630 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOHN TERRENCE HOMES LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 2500 KELLEY PKWY 16135 55TH AVE N 16135 55TH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23 110067 38 33-118-23 It 0118 38 33-118-23 110128 STONEBAY COMMUNITY ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2613 CASCADE LA 2628 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOHN TERRENCE HOMES LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 2500 KELLEY PKWY 16135 55TH AVE N 16135 55TH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23 110068 38 33-118-23 110119 38 33-118-23 11 0129 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 723 STONEBAY DR 2611 CASCADE LA 2616 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 6109 BLUE CIR DR #101 16135 55TH AVE N 16135 55TH AVE N MINNETONKA MN 55343 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23 110069 38 33-118-23 110120 38 33-118-23 110130 CHERYL A KULSETH ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 725 STONEBAY DR 2609 CASCADE LA 2614 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHERYL A KULSETH ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 725 STONEBAY DR 16135 55TH AVE N 16135 55TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23 110070 38 33-118-23 11 0121 38 33-118-23110131 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 737 STONEBAY DR 2607 CASCADE LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 6117 BLUE CIR DR #101 16135 55TH AVE N C/O CEDAR MNGMT INC MINNETONKA MN 55343 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 7260 UNIVERSITY AVE #200 FRIDLEY MN 55432 38 33-118-23 110072 38 33-118-23 110122 38 33-118-23 12 0007 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC H R A CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2605 CASCADE LA 2700 KELLEY PKWY ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC H R A CITY OF ORONO C/O CEDAR MANAGEMENT INC 16135 55TH AVE N 2700 KELLEY PKWY 7260 UNIVERSITY AVE NE #340 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FRIDLEY MN 55432 38 33-118-23 110107 38 33-118-23 110123 38 33-118-23 12 0008 IAN C GATEHOUSE ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC BERKSHIRE PARTNERS LLP 743 BRIDGEWATER DR 2603 CASCADE LA 2745 KELLEY PKWY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 IAN C GATEHOUSE ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC BERKSHIRE PARTNERS LLP 743 BRIDGEWATER DR 16135 55TH AVE N 835 PASTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 110114 38 33-118-23 110124 38 33-118-23 12 0009 KEITH LUNDHAGEN ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC APEX HOLDINGS LLC 2629 CASCADE LA 2601 CASCADE LA 2635 KELLEY PKWY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 KEITH LUNDHAGEN ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC APEX HOLDINGS LLC 2629 CASCADE LA 16135 55TH AVE N 16135 55TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23110115 38 33-118-23 110125 38 33-118-23 12 0027 JUDITH TRUCANO THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 2627 CASCADE LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2637 CASCADE LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 JUDITH TRUCANO THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC 2627 CASCADE LA C/O CEDAR MANAGEMENT INC 16135 55TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 7260 UNIVERSITY AVE NE #340 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 FRIDLEY MN 55432 RUN DATE: 03/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 33-118-23 12 0028 38 33-118-23 12 0038 38 33-118-23 12 0048 ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC LISA A BISHOP V V KLITZKA & G A KLITZKA 2635 CASCADE LA 2670 KELLEY PKWY 108 2670 KELLEY PKWY 118 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC JOHN J HOVANEC GERALD KLITZKA 16135 55TH AVE N SARALEE W HOVANEC VICTORIA KLITZKA PLYMOUTH MN 55446 2670 KELLEY PKWY #108 2670 KELLEY PKWY #118 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0029 38 33-118-23 12 0039 38 33-118-23 12 0049 ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC CAROL A ALLEN REV TRUST KATHERINE POLEY 2633 CASCADE LA 2670 KELLEY PKWY 109 2670 KELLEY PKWY 201 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ESSAY HOLDINGS LLC CAROL A ALLEN KATHERINE POLEY 16135 55TH AVE N 2670 KELLEY PKWY #109 2670 KELLEY PKWY #201 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0030 38 33-118-23 12 0040 38 33-118-23 12 0050 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC R H ROELOFS & J D ROELOFS ELIZABETH ILONA SIMS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2670 KELLEY PKWY 110 2670 KELLEY PKWY 202 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC RONALD H ROELOFS ELIZABETH SIMS 2670 KELLEY PKWY #I 15 JACQUELINE D ROELOFS 2670 KELLEY PKWY #202 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #110 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0031 38 33-118-23 12 0041 38 33-118-23 12 0051 W P DEASE & C A DEASE R FISCHBACH & J FISCHBACH CEKIEL DUANE DANIELSON ET AL 2670 KELLEY PKWY 101 2670 KELLEY PKWY I11 2670 KELLEY PKWY 203 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 WILLIAM P & CHERYL A DEASE ROGER FISCHBACH CEKIEL DUANE DANIELSON 2670 KELLEY PKWY #101 JANIS FISCHBACH JILL L DANIELSON LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #111 2670 KELLEY PKWY #203 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0032 38 33-118-23 12 0042 38 33-118-23 12 0052 ANN L ROETTGER DEBORAH A CARLSON KATHLEEN V LEACH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 102 2670 KELLEY PKWY 112 2670 KELLEY PKWY 204 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ANN L ROETTGER DEBORAH A CARLSON KATHLEEN V LEACH 2670 KELLEY PKWY #102 2670 KELLEY PKWY #112 2670 KELLEY PKWY #204 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0033 38 33-118-23 12 0043 38 33-118-23 12 0053 KATHRYN Y DURYEA TRUST LINDA S WISMER D E TERRY & L K TERRY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 103 2670 KELLEY PKWY 113 2670 KELLEY PKWY 205 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 KATHRYN Y DURYEA LINDA S WISMER DEAN E TERRY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #103 2670 KELLEY PKWY #113 LESLEY K TERRY LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 2675 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391 38 33-118-23 12 0034 38 33-118-23 12 0044 38 33-118-23 12 0054 CONSTANCE M PERSONS TIC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC TODD HAUGAN/TERESA HAUGEN 2670 KELLEY PKWY 104 2670 KELLEY PKWY 114 2670 KELLEY PKWY 206 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CONSTANCE M PERSONS TJC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC TODD R HAUGAN 2670 KELLEY PKWY #104 404 SPADARO DR TERESA J HAUGAN LONG LAKE MN 55356 VENICE FL 34285 2670 KELLEY PKWY #206 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0035 38 33-118-23 12 0045 38 33-118-23 12 0055 MICHAEL E & PAMELA J LINK KIM A GOWDY/ELIN KAY S GOWDY MARK BAUER & DEBRA BAUER 2670 KELLEY PKWY 105 2670 KELLEY PKWY 115 2670 KELLEY PKWY 207 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL E & PAMELA J LINK KIM A GOWDY MARK BAUER & DEBRA BAUER 2670 KELLEY PKWY #105 ELIM KAY S GOWDY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #207 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #115 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0036 38 33-118-23 12 0046 38 33-118-23 12 0056 CRAIG M FELBER/MARY M FELBER PATRICIA A RUYF TRUSTEE M GUBERUD & B J GUBERUD 2670 KELLEY PKWY 106 2670 KELLEY PKWY 116 2670 KELLEY PKWY 208 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CRAIG M FELBER PATRICIA A RUYF M ROBERT GUBERUD MARY M FELBER 2024 SHOREWOOD LANE BARBARA J GUBERUD 2670 KELLEY PKWY #106 MOUND MN 55364 2670 KELLEY PKWY #208 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0037 38 33-118-23 12 0047 38 33-118-23 12 0057 R W CASWELL & M K K CASWELL A C LEMING & C LEIDING ELIZABETH CARPENTER DUFF 2670 KELLEY PKWY 107 2670 KELLEY PKWY 117 2670 KELLEY PKWY 209 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 RICHARD W CASWELL ALAN C & CHRISTINE LEMING ELIZABETH CARPENTER DUFF MARY K KILLORIN CASWELL 2670 KELLEY PKWY #117 2670 KELLEY PKWY #209 2670 KELLEY PKWY #107 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 03/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 3 38 33-118-23 12 0058 38 33-118-23 12 0068 38 33-118-23 12 0078 JACK VACCARO/SHEILA VACCARO CORY C MORTENSON DANELLE J WOLF & MARK T WOLF 2670 KELLEY PKWY 210 2670 KELLEY PKWY 220 2670 KELLEY PKWY 310 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JACK VACCARO/SHEILA VACCARO CORY C MORTENSON MARK T & DANELLE J WOLF 2670 KELLEY PKWY #210 4820 QUANTICO LN N 2670 KELLEY PKWY #310 LONG LAKE MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0059 38 33-118-23 12 0069 38 33-118-23 12 0079 DAVID QUIGLEY TRUST H B DETTLOFF & J L DETTLOFF BARBARA J VOORHEES 2670 KELLEY PKWY 211 2670 KELLEY PKWY 301 2670 KELLEY PKWY 311 ORONO MN $5356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID QUIGLEY TRUSTEE HOWARD B & JEAN L DETTLOFF BARBARA J VOORHEES 4203 BAY BEACH LANE #3C 2670 KELLEY PKWY #301 2670 KELLEY PKWY #311 FORT MYERS BEACH FL 33931 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0060 38 33-118-23 12 0070 38 33-118-23 12 0080 JANE KENNEDY & DAVID BENSON THOMAS M WICK HELEN S WALDRON 2670 KELLEY PKWY 212 2670 KELLEY PKWY 302 2670 KELLEY PKWY 312 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JANE KENNEDY & DAVID BENSON THOMAS WICK HELEN S WALDRON 2670 KELLEY PKWY #212 2670 KELLEY PKWY #302 2670 KELLEY PKWY #312 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0061 38 33-118-23 12 0071 38 33-118-23 12 0081 J A OBERSTAR/A J OBERSTAR LEONID FROLOV R H MURPHEY & JUNE M MURPHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 213 2670 KELLEY PKWY 303 2670 KELLEY PKWY 313 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOHN A OBERSTAR LEONID FROLOV ROBERT H MURPHEY ANTHONY J OBERSTAR 2670 KELLEY PKWY #303 JUNE M MURPHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #213 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #313 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0062 38 33-118-23 12 0072 38 33-118-23 12 0082 BRETT OSLUND & DIANE OSLUND R & S HAEGELE REVOC TRUST DONNA KJONAAS & MURRAY SMITH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 214 2670 KELLEY PKWY 304 2670 KELLEY PKWY 314 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRETT OSLUND RANULPH F HAEGELE DONNA MAE KJONAAS 7511 PLEIN AIRE SANDRA L HAEGELE MURRAY T SMITH SAN DIEGO CA 92127 2670 KELLEY PKWY #304 2670 KELLEY PKWY #314 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0063 38 33-118-23 12 0073 38 33-118-23 12 0083 L A SCHWARTZ & D C SCHWARTZ RICHARD & LILA MOBERG MATTHEW J LATSON ET AL 2670 KELLEY PKWY 215 2670 KELLEY PKWY 305 2670 KELLEY PKWY 315 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LARRY ALBERT SCHWARTZ RICHARD & LILA MOBERG DANIEL B LARSON DEEANNE CARYNE SCHWARTZ 2670 KELLEY PKWY #305 1160 CORD 19 2670 KELLEY PKWY #215 LONG LAKE MN 55356 MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0064 38 33-118-23 12 0074 38 33-118-23 12 0084 L O HARRELL & MARY A HARRELL LOUISE N KANIVE REVOC TRUST KATHERINE A NORTHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 216 2670 KELLEY PKWY 306 2670 KELLEY PKWY 316 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LEONARD O HARRELL LOUISE N KANIVE REVOC TRUST ROBIN M MOHN MARY A HARRELL 2670 KELLEY PKWY #306 2670 KELLEY PKWY #316 2670 KELLEY PKWY #216 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0065 38 33-118-23 12 0075 38 33-118-23 12 0085 CLINTON BROVIAK PAUL N JENSEN/LORRI A JENSEN CARRIE A KAMINSKI 2670 KELLEY PKWY 217 2670 KELLEY PKWY 307 2670 KELLEY PKWY 317 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CLINTON BROVIAK PAUL N JENSEN CARRIE A KAMINSKI 2670 KELLEY PKWY #217 LORRI A JENSEN 2670 KELLEY PKWY #317 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #307 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0066 38 33-118-23 12 0076 38 33-118-23 12 0086 HAZEL J KUJAWA S G S-HEISER/ROBERT J HEISER SHIRLEY PYLE 2670 KELLEY PKWY 218 2670 KELLEY PKWY 308 2670 KELLEY PKWY 318 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 HAZEL J KUJAWA SHARON G STEPHENSON-HEISER SHIRLEY PYLE P O BOX 310 ROBERT J HEISER 2670 KELLEY PKWY #318 SYLVAMA OH 43560 2670 KELLEY PKWY #308 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0067 38 33-118-23 12 0077 38 33-118-23 12 0087 EUGENE R KUEHN PATRICK G LYNCH J B ROTSCH & S E S ROTSCH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 219 2670 KELLEY PKWY 309 2670 KELLEY PKWY 319 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 EUGENE R KUEHN PATRICK G LYNCH JAMES B & SUSANNE E S ROTSCH 2670 KELLEY PKWY #219 2670 KELLEY PKWY #309 9833 EAST SUNRIDGE DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CHANDLER AZ 85248 RUN DATE: 03/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 4 38 33-118-23 12 0093 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 2670 KELLEY PKWY #115 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 13 0002 ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2687 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCH DISTR #278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 13 0015 WJM PROPERTIES LLC 2605 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 WJM PROPERTIES LLC ATTN GREGORY W WAGENER 12550 WAYZATA BLVD MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 33-118-23 13 0019 METRO STORAGE ORONO LLC 2725 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 METRO STORAGE HHF VENTURE METRO STORAGE LLC 13528 BOULTON BLVD LAKE FOREST IL 60045 72 33-118-23 14 0021 THE 10 SPORTS DOME LLC 2465 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE MN 55356 THE 10 SPORTS DOME LLC 2465 WEST WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. M Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/20/2018 2700 ' 2745 (e) 2725 1 2687 (2) 2725 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: b 7kj 7 766 764 ° lam) (e' (110) (734) 765 (133) 765 (90) 758763(91) l»�� 761 (92) � (75) AMS $ t6 7� ps) r 745 743' (108) 107) yi (17) (30) 1� 7 (31-87) R __J�(121 Wayzata Blvd W 2605 2605 2465 1 2455 1 J2445 0 60 120 240 ft This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy, (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South.. Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: March 21, 2018 Date Application Considered as Complete: April 9, 2018 60 -Day Review Period Expires: June 8, 2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: April 16, 2018 Subject: LA18-000035, Ryan Hasse, Nicole Speck and Gary Johnson 3800 Shoreline Drive, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a dog kennel in the B-5 limited neighborhood district and a Site Plan Review to add a new accessory building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for "DogHaven", subject to the following conditions: 1. The operator maintains the annual kennel license. Failure to maintain the kennel license shall render the Conditional Use Permit to lapse. 2. Dogs shall be supervised while outdoors at all times. 3. All MCWD requirements are met. 4. Re -strip the parking lot to improve and identify the parking stalls, per city code. Background Per the City Code (92-161) definition of Commercial kennel means any place or premises where three or more dogs over six months of age are kept or housed at any one time for commercial purposes, including sale, boarding, breeding, grooming, training or medical care. Kennel is listed as a Condition Uses in the B-5 district. Proposal Use. The applicants propose to use the existing building (1244 sq.ft.) for "DogHaven", a dog daycare, grooming spa, and training facility. The will offer overnight boarding on a limited basis. They will have staff on-site anytime there are dogs being boarded overnight. A staff member will also always be present if dogs are using the outdoor area. Site Plan Zoning Use North LR -1C Hennepin County Garage South LR -1C Shoreline Drive East LR -1C-1 Navarre Fire Station West B-5 Commercial Hope Chest- Retail Site Plan LA18-000035 April 16, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Buildings. The applicants are proposing to update the existing building fagade by painting the exterior grey with white trim and replacing the roof with a dark gray metal to match the proposed building. They are also proposing to construct a 1,932 sq ft accessory structure (42' x 46'). This proposed building will match the color scheme of the main house with grey horizontal siding, white trim, dark grey roof. The applicants will also add stone fagade on the lower portion of the building and glass windows to cover the street side of the building. Elevations drawing are included as Exhibit B. This accessory building will be open interior with one restroom. This will be used as an indoor play area for the dogs year round. They will also add a 6 foot white vinyl privacy fence surrounding the outdoor dog area. They will also use the same fence to enclose the garbage area which directly abuts the west side of the new building. The applicant will also fence a small "Dog Catch Area" for a transition into the property and a small potty grass area for better maintenance of grounds and improved dog care. Exhibit C is a narrative of the project which includes plans to address noise and waste. Landscaping: The applicants are proposing the place a 6 foot white vinyl privacy fence along the north and east side the property with a 10 foot setback from the property line. The applicant has stated the setback will allow them access and maintain the fence from both sides. They are not proposing to place the fence forward of the principle building. Sec. 78-766. - Area, height, lot width, setback requirements and design requirements. (f) Fencing. Wherever a B-5 limited neighborhood business district abuts an R district, along the side or rear lot line, a fence or compact evergreen hedge no less than 50 percent opaque nor less than six feet in height shall be erected along the abutting lines except within the required front yard. There is a small "potty grass" area that will be added to the site between the two buildings. Exhibit D was provided by the applicant for further detail. Parking: The existing parking lot will change slightly. The existing lot contains 8 parking spaces. The new parking plan shows 7 parking spaces due to the placement of the accessory building which will remove one space from the lot. The applicant will restripe and maintain the 7 proposed parking spots. The ordinance does not anticipate the proposed use in its parking ratios, though the code prescribes for the most similar use, Day nurseries, which was also used for The Woofington which is a similar use. The applicant provide a Parking Analysis as Exhibit C. Per city Code 78-1516: Day nurseries, four, plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. The Principle building is 1244sq.ft. Following the city code this would require 5 total parking spaces. The accessory building is 1932 sq.ft. If total building area is used to calculate parking requirements, (total of 3,176sq.ft) 8 spaces would be required. The Planning Commission should discuss the interpretation of the parking regulations as they pertain to this business and discuss if the accessory building area should be included as part of the interpretation of the code. Should the applicants provide proof of parking for potential future congestion with the site? LA18-000035 April 16, 2018 Page 3 of 6 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-766 - Setbacks: DISTRICT B-5 Required Existing Princpal Building Proposed Building (New Accessory Building) Front 35' 75' 151.5 Rear 35' 83' 35.5 Side -West 15' 46' 24.5 Side East 35' (abuts R District) 60' 87.5 Section 78-766 - Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT B-5 Lot Area Lot Width Required 20,000 s.f. (0.459 acres) 100' Actual 29,724 s.f. (0.68 acre) 150' Section 78-1403- Structural Coveraee: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 29,724 s.f. (0.68 acre) Allowed: 5,944.8 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 3,176 s.f. (10.6 %) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 10,403.4 s.f. 8,048 s.f. 9,499 s.f. Tier 3 29,724 s.f. (35 %) (27.08%) (31.96%) Applicable Regulation: Section 78-766 Design requirements (g) Building design and construction. In addition to other restrictions of this chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: (1) All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: a. Face brick; b. Natural stone; c. Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; d. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are of any of those noted in subsections (g)(1)a—c of this section, or glass; or e. Other materials as may be approved by the council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. LA18-000035 April 16, 2018 Page 4 of 6 (2) All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the proposed outbuilding meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. Applicable Regulation: Site Plan Review (Section 78-145) Before granting approval of the site plan review, the City Council shall determine that the proposal: 1) Is compatible with surrounding land uses; the use is an appropriate use in the B-5 zoning district, and the design of the building lends itself to the proposed use. 2) Preserves existing unique and natural features of the site and minimizes impacts to wetlands, floodplains, and shoreland areas; the site plan is triggered by the change in use and new accessory structure, which does not impact these features. 3) Creates harmonious relationship of buildings and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship of the development; the site plan is triggered by the change in use and new accessory building. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the proposed accessory structure is cohesive with the existing principal structure. 4) Achieves a safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation system; Vehicular and pedestrian traffic is logically separated. 5) Places no excessive demands on services and infrastructure, including local streets; Not anticipated. 6) Conforms to the city's plans for parks, streets, and walkways; no change to these features. 7) Conforms to the Orono Community Management Plan; the CMP focuses on preservation on natural resources, and preservation of residential areas and neighborhoods. The proposed use is not regional in nature. The CMP does not reach to the level of zoning districts, only general commercial uses. 8) Achieves a maximum of safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian movement; no conflicts anticipated. 9) Incorporates sufficient landscaping to reasonably screen undesirable features and to enhance the image of the development; the retention of the landscaping areas provides sufficient screening. 10) Protects abutting properties and does not create detrimental disturbances to surrounding properties; the separation of the building and the play areas as well as the fencing areas provides sufficient protection. 11) Conforms to all requirements of this chapter unless a variance has been granted. 12) Incorporates efforts to conserve energy whenever practical. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the LA18-000035 April 16, 2018 Page 5 of 6 application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan the CMP focuses on preservation on natural resources, and preservation of residential areas and neighborhoods. The proposed use provides a service for Orono residents. Further, the proposed use is not regional in nature. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; this statement is true. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; the subject property is adequately served by these services. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; the subject property is adequately served by these services. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; this statement is true. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The Planning Commission should discuss; it appears to be consistent with the commercial nature of the area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; this statement is true. The CMP calls for the improvement of existing commercial structures. The proposed facelift will enhance the appearance of the building. 8) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The main, unique impact anticipated is the noise due to barking dogs, and the elimination of pet wastes. The applicants' plans to address these issues appear to satisfactorily mitigate the concerns. The Planning Commission should discuss these impacts and the proposed solutions. 9) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; the retention of the landscaping areas provides sufficient screening. 10) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; none expected. 11) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; none expected. 12) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; not applicable. 13) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; lighting will be designed to accommodate lighting requirements of the zoning code. and 14) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This statement is expected to be true. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. LA18-000035 April 16, 2018 Page 6 of 6 Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Analysis All uses have impacts, and uses within a commercial district can expect a certain elevated level of traffic, noise, and lighting over residential uses. This proposed use may generate additional impacts over these 'normal' impacts with dog barking, and smells sometimes associated with animals and animal boarding. The applicants are well aware of the noise concerns, and has taken multiple steps to address these through building design and operations. The applicant should describe the sound mitigation strategies so the Planning Commission understands the proposal. The site will be improved by building a new accessory structure for year round indoor play for the animals and privacy fencing surrounding and enclosing the property. Waste will be picked up and disposed of in the garbage. Liquid waste will filter through to the ground. The trash enclosure, proposed at the north corner of the building, may need to be relocated to accommodate clearer traffic movement. The trash enclosure will be screened with white privacy fence. The applicants are proposing to eliminate one existing stall so the site will have a total of 7 stripped stalls. The Planning Commission should discuss how the parking applies to the site. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission should discussion the Parking Analysis and determine if more parking stalls should be required as proof of parking for future use. A potential condition to be added could be: A re -review of the Conditional Use Permit can be done at any time if the city receives complains about parking on the site. Additional parking may be required to be installed) 2. Does the Planning Commission find the proposed use addresses the standards for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval, and thus are appropriate uses on the property? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested conditional use permit? Planning Commission options for consideration Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for "DogHaven", subject to the following conditions: 1. The operator maintains the annual kennel license. Failure to maintain the kennel license shall render the Conditional Use Permit to lapse. 2. Dogs shall be supervised while outdoors at all times. 3. All MCWD requirements are met. 4. Re -strip the parking lot to improve and identify the parking stalls. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing & Proposed Survey and Elevation Drawing Exhibit C. Project and Building Narrative and Parking Analysis Exhibit D. Pro Lawn Truf Detail Exhibit E. Property Owners List ------- r 0 O co co 1 � !,I , 'III , I 111 1111 11 111 I liq IN GOVT. LOT 8, SEC 17-117-23; AND IN LOT 1, BLOCK 9, TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OVERLP IN DESCRIPTION WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY 945.2 12.0 945.9 RAMP 9162 1 N 89040'29" E 154.02 146.34 RE LL TW �T3 5 BW = 942y 34.1 945.9 945. 1 14.5 (C) 0�coE, 0 EXISTING HOUSE #3800 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION = 947.1 938.7 938.7 941.3 (F� A/C PAD (A) (G) EAST �LINE OF/Z GOV'� LOT 8, --------------- SEC, / 17-117-23 Cr RET WALL TW = 941.9 BW = 938.7 'LL RET WALL TW = 941,3 BW = 938.7 gi ;.reg .If. I111 �'11111, 1111,115111 gi I p ig-,' iipigli' 150.88 N 89040'29" E 154.91 SHORELINE DRIVE SOUTH LINE OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 17-117-23 The South 233.00 feet of the East 150.00 feet of Government Lot 8, lying Easterly of the West line of said Government Lot 8, as monumented, and Westerly of the Plat of Townsite of Langdon Park, and that part of Lot 1, Block 9, Townsite of Langdon Park lying West of a line drawn at right angles to the South line of said Section 17, from a point on said South line distant 1315.97 feet West from the South Quarter corner of said Section 17, which lies South of the a line drawn parallel with and 233.00 feet North of said South line of said Section 17, ®* the road. * : Denotes found iron marker o Denotes set iron marker ---94e— Denotes existing countour line 946.0 Denotes existing spot elevation DATE DESCRIPTION FAT ,, "No SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 0.20 X M C15 17 1315.97 W WEST LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 9 TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK SOUTH QUARTER CORNER 17-117-23 im ME SCALE IN FEET I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by my or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 1-19 MN LICENSE NUMBER SCALE 1 1.=20' JOB NO. 18-018 945.9 o zor BITUMINOUS PARKING (H) 945.2 12.0 945.9 RAMP 9162 1 N 89040'29" E 154.02 146.34 RE LL TW �T3 5 BW = 942y 34.1 945.9 945. 1 14.5 (C) 0�coE, 0 EXISTING HOUSE #3800 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION = 947.1 938.7 938.7 941.3 (F� A/C PAD (A) (G) EAST �LINE OF/Z GOV'� LOT 8, --------------- SEC, / 17-117-23 Cr RET WALL TW = 941.9 BW = 938.7 'LL RET WALL TW = 941,3 BW = 938.7 gi ;.reg .If. I111 �'11111, 1111,115111 gi I p ig-,' iipigli' 150.88 N 89040'29" E 154.91 SHORELINE DRIVE SOUTH LINE OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 17-117-23 The South 233.00 feet of the East 150.00 feet of Government Lot 8, lying Easterly of the West line of said Government Lot 8, as monumented, and Westerly of the Plat of Townsite of Langdon Park, and that part of Lot 1, Block 9, Townsite of Langdon Park lying West of a line drawn at right angles to the South line of said Section 17, from a point on said South line distant 1315.97 feet West from the South Quarter corner of said Section 17, which lies South of the a line drawn parallel with and 233.00 feet North of said South line of said Section 17, ®* the road. * : Denotes found iron marker o Denotes set iron marker ---94e— Denotes existing countour line 946.0 Denotes existing spot elevation DATE DESCRIPTION FAT ,, "No SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 0.20 X M C15 17 1315.97 W WEST LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 9 TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK SOUTH QUARTER CORNER 17-117-23 im ME SCALE IN FEET I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by my or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 1-19 MN LICENSE NUMBER SCALE 1 1.=20' JOB NO. 18-018 Ix m z ro Z N W W W _ �/1 VJ Z O — o N J_ a a w a o — Q \ LL.I i m FRONT ELEVATION 1 SCALE 3/16"=1'0" 1 W Z J W � M LO iO z 0 0 o � W o ui — J ui OO Q O O M HUD PF I 17-j jmkb- EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16"=1'0" 1 w m ° � Nz Z z> uj W w W N J_ IL0 Z O . l Q Q W J LLI I_ _ m - - - W Z_ co J � W `r' NORTH ELEVATION 1 z O SCALE 3/16"=1'0" 2 c=n o C) [If O O co M � Z � OEM 2 U) O 00 O O J IJ '- WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16"=1'0" 2 w m D M D \ I w w z z > w of ro 0 N J_ IL IL 1 � � I Wp W I co } co Z W Z � "' NW E Z O 1 O z O CD O 0 O 0 co 0� _. Q W Z_ Z � W w � O _ = o C O I -= - 42' Ix w O Z r 6,_9., 5' 6,_9„ 5' 6'-9" 5, 6'-9" w w sF% 503 Fx 50.36 , w x fV - -I - -- II I 8 I I II I I I o Q- Z a II J ui I I I i I Li OII VI AT I I I I O a I, sL�e 40'A" 44-9" F -- J LL I II I I m a I s z II I I I CROSS SECTION 0 al II I SCALE 1/8"=1'0" 4 �I w Z M I I J LO LU Z O 2 0 z II -CM 7�- O w I I I � � W NII g Q Z SLAB }mss' -10" z r z" s Z J W Q =O 9" S'6" -1 5oan.x (n � O — — — —— — — — — — —— p 00O Q M W-011/16" T-11 5/16" 42' FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8"=1'0" 4 CROSS SECTION�3� SCALE 1/8"=1'0" 4 I IC-INNLrilV ..... ........ EAST J45,56 tt 11 J2 A Rkto wl AMA#40C.4 I A.'A atit try 0,� LAE OF T LOT 00 17-1178 QMASUMD NEW %01�4 3% CJ (4. D* . ........... ................ Y -C" LWC A, NYC VVCR�AF- IN V EXISTING 12.1 0 \��ipj i I pony HOUSE Lo RFAL &RA s' t KI ........... T ....... ......... 150.0 ........... * ............................. ...... ... ..... .. ... V-6 ............. V t4 '' �/j i I c rc SOUTH LME OF City of Orono �oNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 38 pa fHo�FLik/F Qf�vF (y,�.S.rF) S" Ilk Prepared by: Date: GRavBF� G � /ffo c i.rrFs, IA -,C. Date: 9 - i8 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 ier Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER 35 9. 1uoc4ro In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey Total (Square Feet (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A Fw G S.F. 13 � � 19 S.F. C S.F. MA .� S.F. E Gv S.F. F 75 S.F. G A Ic oiPi4 Y S.F. H .t lri i1 Sl 5r 7—Y91iNG d EIk - 0 — S.F. 1W �� S.F. � RZOACTP / S.F. K S.F. L LS.F. S.F. N N S.F. S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover S 7 Y S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1664): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 7 S S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 30, F 9 Y — ,t/ 0 6 t -r P 24),729jr S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4) l „?/. PC % Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 City of Orono �oNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet s Property Address: 3800 I'NaReC"AvE �kESHoa` Prepared by:Date: GR orv/� F' 4 G d A rj, & C /A TFY, Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2ier Tier 4 Tier 5 359, A[tdcri60 Step 1: (STING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to -Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet -(Example) _(garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A0S" 2 S.F. B 19 S.F. G Toa R S.F. D iq A4 P ! S.F. E Odw Fit 13 S.F. F �' 1 t /8r 2 2 f V 7S S.F. G Ale 0,4 ,0 S.F. H e r4 -r DA I/F 7,Vi R Ye AIC -7/57 S.F. I RAVFL lWe' J 1112 S.F. S.F. K S.F. L LS.F. S.F. N N S.F. S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T TS.F. S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total EAsting Hardcover / 2 3 S.F. Exctudablo Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 D S.F. 4 Total Lot Area J-70 89 — / 1'F' 22, 72 Y S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] Z. 7, o 8 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 DogHaven at 3800 Shoreline Drive DogHaven will be a luxurious doggie daycare, grooming spa, and training facility. Additionally, we will offer cage free overnight boarding on a limited and select basis. The proposed facility has been specifically designed to reflect our commitment to the safety and well-being of our dogs and our community. Our goal is to provide dogs of all sizes with a tranquil, safe and enriching place to learn and play. The exercise and the basic training our dogs will receive creates better K-9 citizens in their homes and our community. What sets us apart from our competitors? Training and our large green space for dogs to play! As for training, both the dogs and staff will undergo continuous training, a big part of our holistic approach to improving our dogs' social manners. The facility has been designed to provide a great environment for supervised play as well as for learning. Our clients will choose this environment for the betterment of their dog as we create a wonderful and happy K-9 companion for our clients beyond mere daycare. Obedience training while at daycare will not only make for a safe environment at our facility but will make for happy and well-balanced dogs at home. We pride ourselves and have many years of experience in understanding dog behavior and utilizing that understanding to bridge the human/K-9 language barrier. Our clients are often busy professionals, citizens of Orono who simply don't have the time during their work week to provide care for, exercise, and train their dogs. But, exercise and safe social interaction skill training creates a happy and well-behaved dog. We are happy to provide this service to enhance the quality of life for both our dog and human clients. While at daycare our dogs will be continuously supervised both in and outdoors. As for our other valuable differentiator, our proposed large and beautiful fenced -in green space also sets us apart from other daycare facilities. We will utilize our fenced back yard for 100% supervised doggie playtime. This gives our dogs the opportunity to play and explore in a safe environment. The vast majority of our suburban competitors cannot offer a natural and significant outdoor play space for their dogs. We understand that the majority of clients value green space but have difficulty finding a facility that offers such space. Our staff will monitor all dogs outside and as part of their training. Dogs will not be permitted to engage in excessive barking. Additionally, our 6' high 100% solid vinyl fencing will mitigate sound and exterior stimulation. We will offer, by reservation only, cage free boarding for a limited number of dogs on an overnight basis. The purpose of cage free boarding is to simulate a comfortable home environment and mitigate the noise and anxiety often created by a traditional kennel facility. An employee will be onsite when there are overnight dog guests to provide comfort and ensure safety. Cage free boarding has been utilized by others in the industry including Augusta Dog Training in Long Lake, and with great results. Our motto in this regard is "your dog's home away from home." Therefore, this is not the traditional "put the dog -in -a -cage -lock -the -doors and come back in the morning" facility. Our select clients will pay a premium for this level of service for their beloved K-9 family member. Quiet and sanitary conditions are key to our upscale facility. To maintain a tranquil environment for our clients, their dogs, our staff, and our neighbors, we intend to employ many sound mitigation techniques, including rubberized flooring, sound mitigation panels, insulated walls and solid exterior fencing. Just as important, our staff will monitor barking; and correct our dogs when if it becomes pervasive. Dogs who bark excessively will be dismissed from our program; they won't fit our pack model. Additionally, sanitation is of the highest priority to maintain a safe environment. We will utilize specifically designed "potty grass" in designated potty paddocks. Dogs will be conditioned to go potty in those areas. All pet waste will be removed immediately and placed in a sealed container until removed from the property grounds. Collectively, we have lived and worked in Orono and the Lake Minnetonka area for many years and understand the level of service our clients and our community expect. We will cater to the high expectations of our neighbors, and the surrounding community by providing premium services, training, and dog care to those who expect the best. In this way, DogHaven brings a much needed and valuable service to the citizens of Orono. Sincerely, DogHaven, LLC. Management Team Gary Johnson, Plymouth, MN. Managing Partner, Co -Founder Gary Johnsen is the Managing Partner of Doghaven and Spa and a senior leader with Deloitte Consulting. He is a management and human resources consultant specializing in helping organizations design and deploy innovative HR strategies, operating models and creating innovative customer experiences. With his 29 years of experience, Gary leads Deloitte's HR transformation strategy practice as the national deputy. He has worked as a consultant, leader and manager in several large and small companies across multiple industries. He strongly leads with values of customer and employee service, believing that employees that love their job and company care for their customers and pets. He is a native resident of Minnesota, has a master's degree in psychology from the University of St. Mary and an MBA, mini, from the University of St. Thomas. He is a licensed psychologist. He is a life-long lover of dogs and can be found early in the mornings on the streets and paths of Minneapolis running with his daughter's yellow lab Sebastian. Nicole Speck, Wayzata, MN. Partner, Chief of Operations, Dog Trainer, Co -Founder When it comes to dogs and their owners, Nicole has the magic touch. She has been in the Canine Industry for 11+ years, training, grooming, and caring for dogs (and their owners!). In her short 3 years here in MN, Nicole has quickly garnered a loyal following of clients and pet owners who absolutely love her dedication to customer service, knowledge of dogs, and her approach to creating a cohesive relationship between dogs and their human companions. Also a life-long dog lover, her current Golden Doodle, Maci, is not only a beautiful animal, but a showcase for Nicole's love and capabilities. Nicole is a U.W. Madison Alumni, having majored in Psychology. K Ryan Hasse, Orono, MN. Partner, Co -Founder K Ryan Hasse has been involved with many start up organizations in a multitude of industries. His duties range from capital raising, business planning and strategy formulation, and operations planning. An owner of a tech firm, his specialty is creating alignment between business, management, and I.T. A former dog owner himself, K Ryan has embraced the passions of this team, and our desire to bring a First Class experience to his hometown. K Ryan is a graduate of Gustavus Adolphus College, majoring in Music, Politics and Economics. A New 2"d Building at 3800 Shoreline Drive In order to provide the very best for our clients and their beloved dogs, as well as for the beauty and protection of Orono and its citizens, DogHaven, LLC is intending to construct a new 2nd building on the 3800 Shoreline property. This new facility will be in compliance with all building ordinance and setback requirements. To provide for noise mitigation and safety of the neighbors and dogs themselves, significant design elements are being employed. THE BUILDING: DogHaven intends to build a new structure 42 wide and 46 feet deep, or 1932sf. This building will be built on a new concrete slab in accordance to state and local codes. The building itself will be fully conditioned with insulated walls and ceiling, both for heating/cooling purposes, but also for noise mitigation. It will be a simple, gable -roof structure with a 4/12 slope, and gutters on each end. Wall height will be 12' at the sidewalls, and vaulted in the center to about 21' (exterior dimension). The exterior fagade materials will meet all City of Orono requirements outlined in Sec 78-786 wood and/or concrete reinforced wood paint finished horizontal siding, and some brick and/or concrete fagade styling elements. We intend to have many insulated glass windows, at least one garage door, and at least 2 entry doors. Our goal is to provide our clients and Orono residents with an "upscale look and feel", and this is our Flagship store, so this will be an attractive structure. The interior will consist mainly of a large open area for the dogs to play. The insulated walls will be finished with a combination of products, such as Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) type panels in the first 6' of wall height designed for durability, ease of cleaning and disinfecting. For the comfort of our animals and employees, as well as for preventing noise from escaping the building itself, the upper sections of the wall will have materials selected for their sound deadening characteristics. The floors will have rubber padded surfaces designed specifically for dogs. This flooring also deadens noise. Once the building is built, a sound engineer will design a plan specifically for this building's sound characteristics. It is very important to DogHaven to have a quiet, tranquil, safe space for our employees, the animals, and our neighbors. The new building will also require a bathroom. A plumbing and sewer plan will be drafted and submitted at the time of permit application, along with the HVAC, Electrical, and any other plans that would be necessary for each respective permit. The existing building will undergo a facelift with a look similar to 2377 Shadywood Road in Navarre. We would like the new building to have a look that compliments the face -lifted building which will be similar to this: 9 ■ +.■ a _'� SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: NO VARIANCE REQUIRED: The building will be placed on the NW side of the site, about 15-18' from the B5 zoned lot line on the West (based on the swale area: see below), and 30' from the "R" zoned rear, and in compliance with existing setback requirements. The new building will be at least 10' from the main building. The Site Plan shows the approximate location of the new building. If it is possible to seek a variance regarding the 30' setback in the rear, this would potentially change the shape of the building to be longer and narrower and would be our preference. This variance probably wouldn't affect the site to the North, a DMV site where they store sand and salt. A variance in this regard would be our preference, but not required. There will be a fenced in dumpster on the West side of the new building. This dumpster may be rotated so as to comply with the fence setback requirements. HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS: NO VARIANCE REQUIRED: Gronberg and Associates, Long Lake, completed our Site Plan and Hardcover Analysis. Based on Mark Gronberg's calculations, we have more than enough hardcover square footage to build a building this size. Based on final building placement, we will be removing a small portion of the existing parking lot, which further reduces our total combined hardcover. RAIN WATER RUNOFF/MCWD: We are aware of the MCWD plan for this site. There is a swale area that is used for parking lot runoff. Our intent is that we will not disturb that area, and continue its use as -is. Rain water from the new building gutter system will be directed toward the existing area which is what happens now. Attached to this application you will find the current MCWD plan which we are intending to maintain. Below is a general view of what we propose to build, though we will have more windows overall to give the building an even more upscale look. An ADA compliant entry door will apron flush to the existing driveway. We would like to construct a building with a somewhat modern look and feel, but still very consistent with the existing home/structure. The colors and presentation would be similar to the 2377 Shadywood example. The two building combined will have a design continuity with each other. WWSB-1508 DogHaven at 3800 Shoreline Parking Plan and Analysis There is sufficient parking at 3800 Shoreline for our business use. While we will be reducing the number of existing spots by a net of 1 with the new building, the area in the back of the parking lot that has served as an oversized back -in area will be re -captured as a parking spot for employee use. This new parking spot is to the West of the new building, and is already paved. A parallel spot could also be created behind the new spot on the Western most edge of the parking lot —again, for employees only. Our employees, 1-3 at a time, will utilize the back spots. The remaining 5 spots in front will be for our customers. Generally speaking, we wouldn't expect this parking lot to ever reach capacity because our customer's drop off and pick up their dog(s) very quickly, most often in just a couple/few minutes. However, we could add more parking to the front of the building as needed. We have the room in the existing Hard Cover allocation. Net Business Square Footage used as "public" space/customers: Lobby: 150sf. Entryway: 80sf. Total: 230sf 4/9/2018 Prol-awn Turf I Pet Turf - Pet Friendly Artificial Grass - Fake Grass for Pets Free Design Estimates - 1-877-405-5296 info@prolawnturf.com 1 1 w PRODUCT PORTFOLIO Atsuu i u- ii ESTIMONIALS BLOG CONTACT Pet Turf Artificial Grass for Pets Home Pet Turf "How does Prol-awn hold up under the use of our furry friends?" is one of the most common questions asked. Not only is it a ver) really the most important question a pet owner can ask. Prol-awn's line of pet turf products are engineered to be one of the mos - available on the market. For many years, one of the most common complaints with artificial turf has been the odors caused by pet urine. The primary rea been the system of drainage. Most turf products offer a solid urethane or latex backing system with holes punched in the backini drainage system logically will show it's obvious flaw. Most of the urine that gets into the turf does not magically find its way to on your dog has incredible aim). Therefore, the urine sits in the turf. The bigger problem with urethane or latex is that, by nature, th of their mass in moisture. When this happens, no amount of cleaning or hosing of the product will completely get rid of the urine Prol-awn Turf's 100% permeable DuraFlo backing system is designed to allow moisture to drain through 100% of the products ba Environmentally Engineered DuraFlo Backing Systems is made of a Geo -Textile Polyolefin, or spun plastic. As we know, plastic do by nature, allow a good soaking to wash the pet urine out of the product and into the absorbent base underlayment material. Th https:Hprolawnturf.com/pet-turf/ 1/6 4/9/2018 Prol-awn Turf I Pet Turf - Pet Friendly Artificial Grass - Fake Grass for Pets higher permeability rates than the urethane /latex backed turf products. This unique characteristic makes Prol-awn one of the ml available on the market today. The short answer to the question is that most turf products are not a very good solution for pet owners. However, have been end Prol-awn Turf is a great solution for pet owners, kennels, and pet boarding facilities anywhere. https://prolawnturf.com/pet-turf/ 2/6 4/9/2018 ProLawn Turf I Pet Turf - Pet Friendly Artificial Grass - Fake Grass for Pets Here's a testimonial letter from a busy pet fac Dear ProLawn Turf., My husband and I own two commercial dog boarding kennels. The dog exercise area gets heavy use from some very active and.5 had our concerns whether artificial turf would stand up to such abuse. We researched the different types of turf available and dE most recent projects because of the backing (it drained well) and the weave seemed to need less raking to prevent matting. The c problems with dogs digging in it or tearing it up. It is easy to keep clean and our kennel is so much cleaner now. We even use sm, outside portion of the dog kennels to encourage the dogs to "potty" in that area of their kennel. These small pieces are surprisin€ dogs just don't tear them up like they do the lambswool beds and the rubber mats. ProLawn is the turf we selected for our own home landscaping project. Our own dogs love rolling in it after theyget their baths a installed the ProLawn we had a continuous battle with the gophers and now we never are bothered with gophers. We love the ProLawn Turf because it is beautiful, it is a time saver, its clean, and affordable. Our only regrets are that we did not Sincerely, Karen Pechacek Spring Creek Kennels https:Hprolawnturf.com/pet-turf/ 3/6 Al z� r aw •„ g if —�Ahl,— — .or.6d —: AO . -VI 3 mm r" ��iWJir�t .xs v4j1 I�`Ji n 4 4/9/2018 About ProLawn Turf The founders of ProLawn Turf have been designing and installing custom synthetic putting greens, golf practice areas, and artificial lawn projects in Southern California since early 1998. Starting their careers with one of the largest synthetic turf companies in the world, the team developed a passion for the industry and gained a technical expertise that few can rival. Prol-awn Turf I Pet Turf - Pet Friendly Artificial Grass - Fake Grass for Pets ProLawn Links Mhero- REGISTERED CONTRACTOR CSoCal n AWater$mart Powered by Cali Style AC.CIZEDITED BUSINESS Recent Projects op 'J J „ter- - Contact ProLawn Phone: 1 -877 -405 -LAWN (5296) Email: info@prolawnturf.com Corporate Offices 27617 Commerce Center Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 CA License #: 910073 Turf FAQ Blog Product Portfolio Testimonials Contact Us https://prolawnturf.com/pet-turf/ 6/6 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/20/2018 11:3901 LZZ4L E � 3750 3140 '�a- 0 3760 A (672258 3822 3816, 3780 N ov th e i n (p) (18) 3842 3832 3800 3763872 3852 3900 3862 1916 - - � \ e 37n3 0 N o r twig (�vpv 37 is - �,.•• (s9) 3755 3880 tpn�lA 3900 61) (86) fi '> (43) 3770 J o )Moa (4) (41 3860 3850 (6) i (5) • X905 3895 3117124257(9 (4) ta1386 (12) 2445 (11) 2465 (13) 2475 (14) Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 3800 Shoreline Drive, Orono )1` 3745 C 2420 (7) \ :O �i 464 O (1) 2460 6) 2466( N (Z) 2470 (5) 2476 (4) 2480 2485 (3) 2500 1.. -*-J 3745 1 2545 0 60 120 240 ft I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE: 03/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) 38 17-117-23 33 0005 38 20-117-23 210025 DAVID UMBEHOCKER NW ENG LUTH SYNOD 3860 SHORELINE DR 3745 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID UMBEHOCKER GOOD SHEPHERD LUTH CHURCH 3860 SHORELINE DR 3745 SHORELINE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0006 38 20-117-23 22 0007 LEERYAN OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC J MICKELSON & T MICKELSON 3850 SHORELINE DR 3865 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 BARBARA S HENSLEY JEFFREY & TINA MICKELSON 3850 SHORELINE DR 3865 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0007 38 20-117-23 22 0008 M E BREWER & B L BREWER BRENT D WALTON 3800 SHORELINE DR 2405 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARK E & BARBARA L BREWER BRENT D WALTON 3800 SHORELINE DR 2405 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0151 38 20-117-23 22 0009 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN JEAN WALSH 3880 SHORELINE DR 2425 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN JEAN WALSH ATTN: REAL ESTATE MANAGER 2425 DUNWOODY AVE 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 17-117-23 34 0083 38 20-117-23 22 0010 LAKE MTKA WOODS ASSOC JAMES C BEISE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2435 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC JAMES C BEISE C/O COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 2435 DUNWOODY AVE 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E #101 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0085 38 20-117-23 22 0011 TONKA VENTURES LLC M N SCHUEHLE & S K SCHUEHLE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2445 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC MARK N & SANDRA K SCHUEHLE C/O COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 2445 DUNWOODY AVE 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E 9101 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0086 38 20-117-23 22 0012 CITY OF ORONO JAMES C BEISE 3770 SHORELINE DR 2437 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JAMES C BEISE 2750 KELLY PKWY 2435 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 210001 38 20-117-23 22 0013 JOSEPH & MARGARET HENDERSON ROBERT V UMBEHOCKER 2464 DUNWOODY AVE 2465 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOSEPH & MARGARET HENDERSON DOUGLAS R UMBEHOCKER 2464 DUNWOODY AVE 4785 WILSHIRE BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 210002 AMY MARIE STEELE GAYLORD 2460 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 AMY MARIE STEELE GAYLORD 2001 LAKESIDE LANE MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 210018 CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 PAGE: 1 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Item 7 Date Application Received: March 21, 2018 Date Application Considered as Complete: April 10, 2018 60 -Day Review Period Expires: June 9, 2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: April 16, 2018 Subject: LAI 8-000036, Orono Apartments, LLC — John Patch, 2745 Kelley Parkway, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Change Amendment, Site Plan Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the Community Management Plan (Land Use) and Zoning Map (Zoning) to develop the 2.55 acre parcel into an apartment building. The Master Development Plan are prerequisites to the Map and Land Use changes. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment to RPUD, and the Master Development Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Metropolitan Council Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 2. Approval of the final Master Plan 3. Additional Easements to protect existing water and storm sewer infrastructure. 4. Approval of hardcover waiver as described. 5. Revised Landscaping plan to meet plant number and size requirements. 6. Expansion of the sidewalk along Kelley Parkway 7. Siding material consistent with Stonebay Condominium. An 8' bituminous trail shall be provided along the southern property line. 8. Payment of fees as prescribed. 9. Watershed approval of the drainage and erosion control measures. 10. Building shall meet all fire and building codes. Fire chief shall approve all hydrant/ connection locations. Background The property under review is Lot 1, Block 2 of the City of Orono Addition, and is located immediately south of the Orono Public Works garage. The property is currently zoned B- 6 PUD, and is guided for Commercial Office use. The site is and has been vacant for many years. In 2004 a plan was developed for a proposed office building; though no formal action on that plan occurred. FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 2 of 8 There does not appear to be a market for additional office space in Orono, and the Comprehensive Plan suggests no retail uses west of Willow Drive, reducing the land use options for the subject parcel. In February 2018, the City Council reviewed the project in the context of a sketch plan (Case Number 18-4002). This proposal is generally consistent with the sketch plan. The minutes from the City Council meeting is attached as Exhibit J. Proposal The property owner proposes the construction of a 56 unit apartment building on the 2.55 acre property. Improvements will include the 2.5 story building, underground parking, and surface parking and associated utility connections. To complete this project, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment will need to be approved, as will a rezoning to a RPUD. RPUD rezoning requires approval of a Master site plan. The apartments include 1, 1+, and 2 bedroom units. All units are proposed to be market rate. No financial subsidy is requested. The building is U shaped and fronts Kelley Parkway. The defined height of the building was found to be 29 feet. The building elevations suggest rock accents similar to the Stonebay Condominium building. The building is of a residential style, with a peaked roof, consistent with the RPUD standards. The property has been located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in the 1980's, and will be served with municipal sewer and water. The applicant's proposal is described in their narrative, Exhibit C and illustrated in the site plan, elevations, and floor plans, Exhibits D 1-D8. General Site Characteristics The site is vacant. The property is very flat with a relatively shallow water table. There are no wetlands mapped on the property. There are some areas of volunteer trees of low quality, these will be removed and replaced with planned landscaping. To the north of the property is the public works garage, which generates noise and truck traffic not commonly experienced in residential neighborhoods. Also to the north is a 3 story condominium building. To the south is Wayzata Boulevard, a Hennepin County arterial serving approximately 8,000 vehicles per day. Further south is Orono industrial uses. To the west is a medical office building, to the east is vacant land, subject of a proposal to construct a senior housing project. RPUD/ Master Site Plan Analysis The property was zoned to B-6 PUD in June of 2003. Permitted uses were those listed in the B-6 Highway Commercial District, offices, banks, motels, and hotels. There are no zoning districts that permit apartment buildings by right or by conditional use. The developer proposes a rezoning to RPUD. The RPUD District standards are found in Zoning Code Sections 78-621 thru 78-629, attached as Exhibit I. FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 3 of 8 The RPUD district standards indicate an RPUD site must be at least 5 acres in area, but does allow for smaller sites under specific conditions, as noted in the code excerpt below: Sec. 78-626. - Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in compliance with the following: (emphasis added in bold) (1) Minimum area; shoreland district limitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed by the existing zoning district. (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council for review. It would appear that the provisions of 78-626(1)b would be applicable, as the proposed use is adjacent to the Orono Senior Housing project which itself is a component of the Stonebay Master Development and is across Kelley Parkway from the Stonebay Lofts, which are similarly zoned RPUD. Further, because the site is guided for commercial office use with the intention of being rezoned for commercial use, the rezoning would fit within the provisions of 78-626(2). It should be noted that the Council has recently approved three smaller RPUD developments (Orono Senior Housing, Shadywood Villas, and the Eisinger site) so that rezoning the Kelley Parkway parcel to RPUD would not be inconsistent with prior actions. FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 4 of 8 Building Design and Use As noted above, the elevation drawings provided suggest stone accents similar to the Stonebay Condos. Siding material is not noted, staff suggests materials consistent with the Stonebay project, no vinyl. Lot Layout and Lot Standards The specific lot requirements for a multi -family building in RPUD can be found in Section 78-626(7). A summary of those standards is as follows: SETBACKS Required Proposed Building setback from local streets (Kelley Parkway): 35 75.4 Building setback from arterial streets 50 51.5 (Wayzata Boulevard): 36.7 (east), 62.6 Building setback from side lot lines: 35 (West) Parking lot and driving lane setback from 5 (West, 20 (North), all lot lines: 20 15 (South), 62 (East) Minimum setback must be no less than height of the building Building setbacks are met. Parking is proposed via an extension of the existing shared parking lot. The north and west parking setbacks are not met, but are consistent with the existing parking setbacks. In particular, setbacks for the parking spaces on the west side are shared with the lot to the west, a 20 foot setback is impractical and counter to goals of sharing parking spaces. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three stories (not including underground parking level) and shall maintain a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure. The proposal includes a two and 1/2 -story building with a defined height of 29 feet. This defined height meets requirements and is lower than the Lofts across the street and the senior housing project next door. The proposed Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) is 6 feet above Kelley Parkway. According to the architect, this is the worst case height, as the applicant desires the building to be low as possible, but this final elevation is dependent on the elevation of the water table. In the concept stage, some comments were generated regarding the height of the building, and its impact of blocking views from the Condominium building. The applicant has provided a sketch showing the height differential between the subject building and the adjacent Stonebay condos and the as yet developed Senior Housing Project, attached as Exhibit E. The proposed apartment building is the shortest of the three multiple family buildings in the area. FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 5 of 8 Floor Area Ratio. The FAR for a RPUD is capped at 1.0 for residential structures. FAR Analysis Parking Level 31,742 1st Floor 31,742 2nd Floor 31,742 3rd Floor 5,236 Total Building area 100,462 Lot area 111,310 FAR 0.90 Floor Area Ratio of 0.9 meets the requirements. Access, Internal Circulation and Parking The site plan includes 2 driveways onto Kelley Parkway. There is no access to Wayzata Boulevard. One of the access exists, shared with the medical office to the west and is on the property line. The second access is generally 155 feet west of the NE corner. This driveway does not line up with a driveway across the street. It was commented during the concept plan phase that the driveway should line up with a drive on the north side of Kelley Parkway. From staff's perspective, it is not critical that the drives line up. The two drives in question are used almost exclusively by city employees, and one of the drives is primarily an entrance only. The Commission should discuss whether the driveway locations should line up. It does not appear they can shift to the east, this will impact stormwater retention options. Internal circulation is proposed to be provided by a paved driveway along the west side of the building for parking, and a loop driveway in front of the building. Parking includes 54 surface stalls and 72 underground stalls. Parking requirements equal 2 spaces per dwelling unit. Assuming 56 units require 112 spaces, 126 are shown. 14 of these spaces are shared with the medical office to the west. A dumpster enclosure serving the medical office building is located in the SW corner of the site. There is a proposed refuse area located in the parking level. Parks, Trails, Sidewalks The sidewalk along Kelley Parkway from the west terminates near the NW corner of the site. This sidewalk should be continued to the NE corner of the site. A trail along the south property line is anticipated as part of the Stonebay project. Preliminary Hennepin County plans for the upgrade of Wayzata Boulevard include a trail along the north side of Wayzata Boulevard from Willow Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road, within the right of way. The applicants should expect that a trail will be required along their south boundary, with a possible connecting link to Kelley Parkway along the west edge of the stormwater pond. If the trail is to be located on public right of way, the developer should anticipate paying the portion of the trail equal to their front foot costs. RPUD standards include a requirement for 10% of the site being dedicated to private FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 6 of 8 recreational purposes. The project does not show any private recreation. The concept plan discussion introduced the payment of a fee in lieu of this private recreational requirement. There is no park dedication required as this property has been platted. Site Grading, Stormwater and Drainage Improvements Originally, it was anticipated that stormwater, received on site, would be collected and diverted to the large, regional pond to the east. However, based on new stormwater requirements, stormwater will be collected and treated on site, through three rain gardens along the south and east property areas. The city engineer's review of the stormwater plan continues, and their comments will be added to the City Council's review. The property is not within the Stormwater Overlay District, but if developed as RPUD is subject to a maximum hardcover per lot of 50%. Hardcover proposed is 55% of the lot area. A portion of this hardcover is the shared parking lot and dumpster enclosure along the west side. Hardcover calculations are attached as Exhibit F. Stormwater management will be subject to City and MCWD review and approval. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee as noted below. Landscaping The RPUD requirements includes some specific landscaping standards, based on the size of the building and of the parcel. The landscaping plan requires some additional plantings to meet these standards: *The Planning Commission should comment whether the prairie type grasses meet the goals of the shrubbery requirement. Conservation Design While the property is subject to the City's Conservation Design Ordinance, the Council waived this requirement during the concept plan review phase. Comprehensive Plan Amendment In developing the Orono's 2008-2030 Community Management Plan, The city guided specific properties for higher density sewered development (3-7, 7-10, 4-15 and 10-15 units per acre) in order to offset the long -planned sewered development at low densities in the Shoreland areas. In effect, the higher -density guiding of a select number of strategically located properties established a numerical `buffer' which allowed properties previously added to the MUSA and guided/planned for 2 -acre minimum lot sizes, to be developed as historically planned. This allowed for sewerage of lakeshore without increasing density along the lakeshore. Over the last several years, properties guided for higher density development have been Required Proposed 78-626 (14) Size Number Size Number Overstory 2.5 cal 34 2.5 26 Evergreen 6' BB 10 Shrub 3 gal 106 1 gal 131* *The Planning Commission should comment whether the prairie type grasses meet the goals of the shrubbery requirement. Conservation Design While the property is subject to the City's Conservation Design Ordinance, the Council waived this requirement during the concept plan review phase. Comprehensive Plan Amendment In developing the Orono's 2008-2030 Community Management Plan, The city guided specific properties for higher density sewered development (3-7, 7-10, 4-15 and 10-15 units per acre) in order to offset the long -planned sewered development at low densities in the Shoreland areas. In effect, the higher -density guiding of a select number of strategically located properties established a numerical `buffer' which allowed properties previously added to the MUSA and guided/planned for 2 -acre minimum lot sizes, to be developed as historically planned. This allowed for sewerage of lakeshore without increasing density along the lakeshore. Over the last several years, properties guided for higher density development have been FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 7 of 8 developed at lower densities via amendments of the CMP, and the `buffer' established in the 2008-2030 CMP has functionally been eliminated (Eisinger Meadows, Orono Preserve are two recent examples. Some of that buffer was replaced by the recently approved Orono Senior Housing (17-3948) project to the east. The CMP also includes lifecycle housing goals. A project like this does satisfy those goals, especially considering originally planned located were developed at lower densities. The proposed density is 21.9 units per acre (56 units on 2.55 acres). It is worth noting that the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Group is developing a plan amendment that supports additional high density residential along this corridor, rather than introducing additional density along the lakes or in the Shadywood Area of Navarre. It is appropriate to amend the Community Management Plan for the use, given the surrounding land uses and the community goals regarding housing and density. Fire Chief Comment. The Fire Chief has reviewed the project and has added his comments, attached as Exhibit K. Public Comment To date, staff has received one written comment in opposition to the zone change. This letter is attached as Exhibit M. Development Fees Summary As the property has been platted most development fees have been paid. However, staff has identified the following fees applicable to the project: Private Recreation provision: In lieu of the property owner providing 10% of the land in a private recreational component as required by the RPUD zoning, it is suggested that that a recreation fee be paid. 10% of the land value is $41,500. The donation should equal that, less the developers portion of the cost for the trail improvement along the south property line. Water and Sewer Connection Charge: Water and Sewer Connection and SAC charges apply, based on the number of SAC units applied. These fees would be due at the time of Building Permit. The following fees are based on the number of SAC units, as determined by the Met Council, at the time of Building Permit: SAC $2,485 x SAC units = $ TBD Water $4,240 x SAC units = $ TBD Sanitary Sewer $5,100 x SAC units = $ TBD FILE #LA18-000036 April 16, 2018 Page 8 of 8 Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee: Storm water trunk fees apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties and provide funding for the storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the City. The trunk fee is based on the land use and acreage of the property being developed. Residential > 4 units/acre: $8,490/ac x 2.55 acres = $21,649.00 These numbers are based on the 2018 fee schedule and are adjusted at the time of final approval. Summary of Issues for Consideration Staff suggests that the primary focus for consideration and discussion by the Planning Commission should include the following topics: 1. Is there justification for the necessary CMP amendment and rezoning to allow the guiding of this property to be converted from commercial office to residential? If that conversion is not allowed, what other uses for the site might be acceptable (aside from office)? 2. Is the Planning Commission comfortable with the density of the development at over 20 units per acre gross? 3. Should the driveway be shifted to line up with drives on the north side of Kelley Parkway? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this proposal? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Location graphics Exhibit B. Application Exhibit C. Applicants' Narrative Exhibit D. Applicants' Submitted Exhibits: 1. Site Plan 2. Landscaping Plan 3. Garage Plan 4. 1St Floor Plan 5. 2nd Floor Plan 6. Roof level — Section drawings 7. Unit Plans 8. Building Elevations Exhibit E. Building Height Comparison Exhibit F. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Airphoto Exhibit H. Comp Plan Map: Land Use Plan Exhibit L RPUD Ordinance Exhibit .I. City Council minutes dated February 12, 2018 Exhibit K. Fire Comments Exhibit L. Public Notification Map and List Exhibit M. Public Comment PC Exhibit A 18-000036 VVI[ aa" Holl al IDng L`ok� ffig isiona "'�} I �Gen�rnl5mre 12 6,;- L.zm= 0".. ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC GENERAL SITE LOCATION Condos to the Northveest Nlr a L 9 �o �L a 4 EM LL Tfpchni ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC ENLARGED SITE LOCATION Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: Applicant: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Land Use Application Summary 03/21/2018 2745 Kelley Pkwy Orono, MN 55356 LA 18-000036 Property Owner Name: Address: Name: John Patch Address: 3071 Lake Shore Blvd Wayzata, MN 55391 56 unit apartment Amendment Application V Comprehensive Plan Zoning Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application D� PC Exhibit B 18-000036 PC Exhibit C 18-000036 18 March 2018 CONCEPT PLAN FOR JOHN PATCH ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC KELLEY PARKWAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION This application updates the Concept Plan Submittal as approved in January. We have adjusted the stats as shown below. The project is a two story building with partially subgrade parking which meets or exceeds all setback requirements and meets the 30 height requirement. The project tabulation is as follows; SITE AREA 111,310 SF (2.55 ACRES) BUILDING FOOTPRINT 31,784 SF SURFACE PARKING AREA 29,614 SF (27,788+1688+140) TOTAL HARD COVER 61,385 SF (55%) TOTAL GREEN SPACE 49,925 SF (45%) TOTAL BUILDING AREA: FIRST FLOOR 31,742 SF SECOND FLOOR 31,742 SF ROOF LEVEL 5,236 SF TOTAL 68,720 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO .61 APARTMENT UNITS: 2 BEDROOM 16 @ 1100 — 1200 SF 29% 1 BEDROOM + DEN 24 @ 900 — 1000 SF 42% 1 BEDROOM 16 @ 700 — 850 SF 29% TOTAL UNITS 56 PARKING PROVIDED: ENCLOSED NEW SURFACE TOTALAPARTMENT SHARED PARKING TOTAL ON SITE DENSITY: 73 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/UNIT) 40 SPACES 113 SPACES (2.01 SPACES/UNIT) 14 SPACES 127 SPACES (2.26 SPACES/UNIT) SITE AREA NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF BEDROOMS AVERAGE SIZE OF UNITS 2.55 ACRES 56 UNITS 21.9 UNITS/ACRE 72 BEDROOMS (2X16 +24+16) 28.2 BEDROOMS/ACRE 964 SF By comparison the Stonebay Condos at 2670 Kelley Parkway the numbers are: Site area 125,242 sf 2.87 acres Number of units 57 condos (19.9 units/acre) Number of bedrooms 114 bedrooms (39.7 bedrooms/acre) (all units are 2 Bedroom units) Average unit size 1800 sf (smallest unit is 1500sf and largest is 2100 sf) SUMMARY POINTS TO CONSIDER: We are limited in the ability of put the garage level totally underground by groundwater conditions. The project concept proposed meets all setback requirements and height requirements. 1. Market Rate Rental Housing There is a high demand in the area for high quality market rate rental housing. There currently is no rental option in the area of this quality. A full range of available housing will provide Orono residents a needed option which would allow them to remain in the community when looking for housing. 2. Density Evaluation The density of this project compares favorably with the Stonebay condo project. Orono Apartments density is 21.9 units/acre while the Stonebay project is19.9 units/acre. While units per acre is one measure of density other factors are worth taking into account. In addition to being similar in units per acre, Orono Apartments are averaging just over half the physical size of the Stonebay project. Orono Apartments average 964 sf in area. Stonebay units average approximately 1,800 sf When comparing the density of bedrooms Orono Apartments are at 28.2 Bedrooms/acre while Stonebay Condos are at 39.7 Bedrooms/acre. The number of bedrooms generate residents and car traffic. Both size of units and bedroom density are measures that effect the impact of the project on the site. And both are significantly reduced on our site. 3. Building Massing We will design the projects to have a height of 30' (average of roof slope). The highpoint of the Orono Apartments is 14'2" LOWER than the highpoint of the Stonebay condos. We are also comparable in height to the recently approved Orono Senior Housing Community on the adjacent site to the East of our site. We believe that our project will fit well into the community physically while meeting the needs of the community in general by providing market rate rental housing in an area that has a great need for this type of housing. We will look forward to concept approval so that we can develop the engineering and architectural plans for your review and final approval. We have updated the area calculations for the parking, hard cover areas and the floor area ratios based the developed plan. The final hard cover calculations show a hardcover of 55% which means that we have 45% green space. The previous plan approved (Phase II of the medical office proposal) had a hard cover of 71.14% thus leaving a green space of 28.86%. We have therefore decreased the hard cover by 16.14%. Therefore, storm water runoff has been decreased from the previous project. Thank you for your consideration. We will look forward to addressing any questions you have of us. John Patch Orono Apartments Neil Weber, AIA Weber Architects & Planners " N7 MAH0022.98 HOLE RIM=(l 022.98) IW=(l 008.0 1) W (1023.2)1022.5) ...... . .. .. , EXISTING 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER (102Z2) (1021.5) ............(CC7=020!18 GATE L GATE VALVE VALVE __�102 EXISTING 8" DIP WATERMAIN--­!!�_____ (1021.1) TIL CATCH )01 GATE BASIN ...... --­---------------- ----- S 89"15' 26" E (1021.6 VALVE RIM= 1022.70 377.31 --------------- \ ............... *N102 INV=001g-10) (1023.2)-, 3.2) �(l 023. �1)�(1422.6 (1022.1) GATE VALVE GATE 1023.3) ---- 53.0 .... (1021.6 0 VALVE EXISTING 30,---,, TOP OF 81, DIP TOP OF HYDRANT (1022.1 GATE VALVE 30_ To 8.` DIP P OF HYDRANT EXISTING CONC. WALK ( 10 HYDRANT =(1023.47 ME MENEM 41026.34) 1(1023.5) 6" PVC SEWER SERVICE BENT METAL PER CITY AS- BUILT PLANS-* FENCEPOST 0 -- - - - - - (1022.8) 1022.9 .1022.4 10 .5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 102 - - - - - - - WATER SERVIeE F, EXISTING ---- ---PROPOSED CURB & GU ER - Ln PER CITY AS- I CURB U� �3 LIQL4-.61 =1024.4� 024 1024, BUILT PLANS 1019-25of i . I11 $1, PLUG 0 PROPOSED AREA 3 RAIN GARDEN NWL= 1121.0 1024.3 > r1024.1 -1 100 YR HWL 1022.32 23.6 n 5 ------------ ----- ------ ----------.. S 'A C ESl . ... 1 1090 ......1. > 1022 -�\-\ _ \ LU 1 Ld EDGE OF 021 La 1023.2) EXISTING-_,� 1023.4 1020 pi BLACKTOP (1023.8) B L NG 1022.7 E B C 35 PROPOSED (1022.7) IN S ..... % Ld CURB AND C� GUTTER 7 CATCH BASIN ..... V) .1 ....... W 0 1022:85 1022.9 1021.8 1019. �11�"V:� 1018 g5� - 0--023J (1023.5) 1 2 IU2 102 1023.6) UTTER 1026 1023 1023.8) PROD -S 1024.5 1024.2 25 10 -------- 102 % .........................64.5 ... .......... 1025.3 4." 710 1018.0 36.7 ONC ETE CN IL f 1026.0 CURB & 10 A (1023.3) PROPOSED/' 1026 GUTTER FRENCH DRAIN RIM= 1018.0 <1025 INV= 10 16.5 0 I 1024 0 1025 C> 0') 4K EXISTING :BL(1023.3) ACKTOP to kPROPOSED Cn LIJ 0 PARKING AREA -------- 2�,. 0 CLEANOUT (1023.3) IN a- U U 0s < 30 3.0 0 < C14 C .0 V) 10 70 (1024.4) 6 DOOR 1026.4 3t 4 ........ 26 DOOR C> _J0 L0 W t I I (1023.0) L__Z_ z Li /1022.6)____5- < uS CATCH BASIN (1023.7) RIM1022.4CL =�jINV= 019.161to 1027.0 1026 142 1027.a 1027 a c4 (0-4 z o Cd 0 co < V r, 6111_� (1023.2 (1023.3): 1123. Ld -3 SPACES C\1 < LLJ W 0 (61026.5 1027.7 < - cr, 0 (1023.2} = V) OD Ld of 0 PROPOSED n WALK Z 0 1023.4) (1024,6) I EL 36.0 60.0 �\ \ I q (1023.2) 36.0 to 5�(1023_4) Ll (1023.6) 6.0 / \ 23.51 (1024.3) Lij /110 P R ON P O -S 3,0 35 11 1 B I r11- 7 1 MAIN FLOOR 3.0 L0 (g L IT)" I N U GARAGE LEVEL c6 0 1022.7) 0\ #2745 35 0 1022.4} I 0 (1024.5) I PC Exhibit D1 18-000036 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY & PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR F pa" W F B A 14 IT T MANHOLE RIM= � 1020.94) INV= 1009.54 ,_,.L_CATCH BASIN IM=(1020.32) L INV=(1013.27 JNV= 10 15.4 1021.6) RIM= 1 PROP( : WEIR 02.3 : 0 0 LO *--(1024.1) (1025.7) 0 0 0 0 0 Z, V) G a I I C-4 100.0 10.0 4 ............ ..1,. .0 96 n....... . -- ---- F o I 28.0 .(J.Q 38 - - - - - - - ___ : - - - - - - - ........ .. ..... ..... . . ... Ci 18-073 1-022,1025 0 / 1024 0 C: Ln 2 a) ; rLO - .4 .. .............. 1023.5 1022. 75 >0, W 0 :3 0 A027 11026.5 �D E z ,I I Z cf) PROSED C*4 Z) 0 1 E z 1027 z n, 0 CURB C: C:0 Q) C: z W L - n PROPOSED AREA PROPOSED NWL=1023 5__ 5 RAIN GARDEN 10��"WL 1024.96 022.75 1025.4 ;IN CO- 41 4-1QJ C) 0 5 CtTCH BASIN RiteJ = 0 a) :to 0 WEIR OUTLET -1102ary -4- 5 0 INV DRAT E ND EME ..... i_EX9 S CURB 1025 (1023.9) L 1024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- 1023.7) - - - - - - - C) (1024.3) 50.0 TOP OF 1023.8) HYDRANT =(1026. --------------------------124- TE E H N 024-4) (1023.4) (1022.9}_ .......................... -TELEPHONE M MANHOLE (1022.7) N 89015' 26" W (1022.7) 377.35 .............................. (1022.7)- (1022.6) (1022.2) H. A - ,.-NORTH EDGE OF BLACKTOP ROADWAY% N7r7 " A Y LATA LWA'r 'r T" b VD W. Ci 18-073 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 1, Block 2, CITY OF ORONO ADDITION o : denotes iron marker (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum _917- denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing parking lot, curb and gutter, visible utilities, spot elevations and topography, and the proposed location of a proposed building, parking lot, sidewalks and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Lot area = 111,310 Sq. ft. Proposed building = 31,742 sf Existing & proposed parking = 27,788 sf Proposed walks = 1686 sf Existing walk = 140 sf Total hardcover = 61,356 sf Proposed green space = 49,954 sf OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CITY OF ORONO ADDITION 0 C: Ln 2 a) TI HENNEPIN COUNY, MNNESOTA rLO - .4 < 0 >0, W 0 :3 0 �D E z Z cf) N Ln 0 1 E z z n, 0 C: C:0 Q) C: z W L - n 0 �4 t__1 > ;IN CO- 41 4-1QJ C) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 1, Block 2, CITY OF ORONO ADDITION o : denotes iron marker (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum _917- denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing parking lot, curb and gutter, visible utilities, spot elevations and topography, and the proposed location of a proposed building, parking lot, sidewalks and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Lot area = 111,310 Sq. ft. Proposed building = 31,742 sf Existing & proposed parking = 27,788 sf Proposed walks = 1686 sf Existing walk = 140 sf Total hardcover = 61,356 sf Proposed green space = 49,954 sf 0 C: Ln 2 a) rLO - 0 :3 0 0 a) L E z cf) E 0 C: C:0 Q) C: Z V) C: E-:03 CO- 41 4-1QJ C) 0 a) 0 CD -4- 0 Autumn Blaze, Naple Japanese Tree Ginko Nackberry Prdriefire, Crab Tree, i 0 1 . 0 . . 0 . w - 0 NAYZATA BLVD. K 12 FAR<NA)-" PC Exhibit D2 18-000036 QTY PLANT SIZE DO NOT FEAVLY PRHNE 1'IE TREE AT j o0 TREES PLANING PRINE ONLY CROSSOVER � ° � p � � NMBS. CA MAN LEADERS. AND " ""�\ 5 CRAB, PRAIRIEFIRE 2.5" BB 4 GINKO, AUTUMN GOLD 2.5" BB 2 HACKBERRY 2.5" BB 2 LILAC, JAPANESE TREE 2.5" BB 2 LOCUST, SKYLINE 2.5" BB 6 MAGNOLIA LEONARD MESSL 2.5" BB 13 MAPLE, AUTUMN BLAZE 2.5" BB 3 MAPLE, GREEN MOUNTAIN 2.5" BB NARRNOOD STAkES Gk OTNek APPROVCTJ STAKE MATERW. BO MM (2 W lNJ.01. DO NOf RACE DO NOT COVER THE TOR Q TIE ROOT MULCH NCONTACT —H TREE TRNK. MANFAN THE MIL.CH WEED -FREE FOR SHRUBS and GRASSES A ANIMllM GF fNEEE VEARS AMR PLANING 33 FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT. 84 PRAIRIE DROPSEED #I CONT. 14 SEA GREEN JUNIPER #1 CONT. DO NOT FEAVLY PRHNE 1'IE TREE AT j o0 PLANING PRINE ONLY CROSSOVER � ° � p � � NMBS. CA MAN LEADERS. AND " ""�\ INM Ok DEAD BRANOES SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL o DRANCIIES MAV DE PRWED� p ° q� ° a Po� o NOWEVB2, DO NOT MOVE TVE a o JN, BUDS W BRAVOES fliAT a THAT a%TCND TO TFE EDGE THE CROWN, o o o Q a o 0 0 0 15 MM (V2 W RAM. o PlnsM Bose �� o �_ o a GMVANZED WRE OR CABLE 0 0 �� o �o SET TOP OF ROOf DALL AT LEAST � TWIST WISE TO TIGH M o o 25-50 MM (1-2 W ABOVE GRADE COIL o 0 HICi[k IN SIAWLV v SOILS) o 0 0 EACH TREE MAST BE PLANTED SH01 8300x90 MM (>2N s FV9W THAT TIE THINK FLAB 5 VISIBLE AT T11E TOP Q f1E ROOF BALL NARRNOOD STAkES Gk OTNek APPROVCTJ STAKE MATERW. BO MM (2 W lNJ.01. DO NOf RACE DO NOT COVER THE TOR Q TIE ROOT MULCH NCONTACT —H TREE TRNK. MANFAN THE MIL.CH WEED -FREE FOR PALL WH SOIL. A ANIMllM GF fNEEE VEARS AMR PLANING 100 MM (9 W HICK EARTH SALCeR BEYOND EDCf OF ROOf BALL I -III = TANK SOIL AROIND ROOT PALL _ _ // III BASE PRMLY WIYN FOGY PRE551Y� 50 THAT RODE DALL DOES NOT SIPf. REMOVE All THANE, ROPE AW WIRE. MIB BIYJ.N' F m TOP HALF OF Woo BALI. F PLANE 5 51WEV WXN A WEP BASKef AROIND THE ROOT DALL. CIX TFE WIRE BASKEY N FOHR R.ACE5 PLACE ROOT BALL ON HM%CAVATM AW FOLD DOWN 200 MM . w NTO RAVING HOLE. M TANPED 50L. nI;CIPUOU5 1'Mr PLANTING nE!TAll. TYPICAL WfALLATION - 313 (75MM) CAUPW OR M55 Green Nountain Naple. Autumn Blaze Naple, Nackberry yQ`�P',ON FROM TliL, G�pOU�O �� Gq OTTEN BROS. Garden Center & Landscaping 250 W. Wagzata I31vd, �oncj Lake, Mn 55 56 952-4'73-5425 3-20-2018 0 8 N ^SCALE N FEET Pe5Ign Pq Howard Schriever mh,5chr1ever@oUen6ro5,com Often Pro5L Nur5eq & I.JrpL Inc, N PC Exhibit D3 18-000036 ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 18 MARCH 2018 RKING LEVEL IkTf 10 ou C) ID i�ln� 0 architects & planners «80 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 • nw@weberarchitects.com 1 0 UNIT 7 UNIT 6 UNIT UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 1 1— NIT6 UNIT UNI t8 UNIT ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 18 MARCH 2018 UNIT 10 UNIT 1 UNIT 1 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 4 FIRST FLOOR n 30 PC Exhibit D4 18-000036 UNIT 7 0 -wit -2- UNIT 2 10 nu N919pm architects & planners 80 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 2 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 • nw@weberarchitects.com UNIT 1 UNIT 1 UNIT 7 UNIT 6 UNIT 2 L I UNIT 3 I F UNIT 1 UNIT 1 G UNIT 6 UNIT 5 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNI APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 18 MARCH 2018 PC Exhibit D5 18-000036 UNIT 7 UNIT 2 UNIT 2 SECOND FLOOR om 90 10 vu p G � architects & planners 80 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952-476.5863 • nw@weherarchitects.com 3 1 PC Exhibit D6 18-000036 UNIT 2 - -UNIT 10 ORONO 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 18 MARCH 2018 UNIT 10 UNI 1 L ROOF LEVEL 10 °V 0 0 0 architects & planners 1pt2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 4 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 • nw@weberarchitects.com ORONO 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR APARTMENTS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAMADLLYREGISTERED ARCHITECT 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ORONO, MINNESOTA DATE 18 MARCH 2018 NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION #11325 I PC Exhibit D7 18-000036 UNIT 1 irI architects & planners 2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5963 nw@weberarchitects.com ORONO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUW, SPECIFICATIONOR APARTMENTS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYMY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT DU T I AM A LY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY acrSTaATION 611326 ORONO, MINNESOTA UNIT 2 � p O architects & planners 2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5663 nw@weberarchitects.com 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION #11325 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA UNIT 3 �W oI�n� architects --planners ORONO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN. SPECIFICATION OR �� �� �� REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT. SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT' p yew' UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ORONO, MINNESOTA NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION 011325 18 MARCH 2 10 UNIT 4 11 "Wy —Doi —9 -� architects & planners .22N Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 552.476.5863 nw@,meberarchitects.com ' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATE NEIL WEB R, AIA REGISTRATION 411325 ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 8 MARCH 2018 UNIT 5 D '9 Jv architects & planners ".2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 nw@weberarchitects.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TM PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REOISTEREO ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION 011 32 5 ORO O 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY DRONO, MINNESOTA UNIT 6 DA architects & planners 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS RAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY f&ZG$STERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA, ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA DATE 19 MARCH 2019 NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION #11325 UNIT 7 architects planners 2260 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55656-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 552.476.5663 nw@weberarchitects.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SIRS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. �0-1100rlbo] APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA UNIT 8 architects & planners il x DATE 852.476.4434 NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION #11325 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPAMM BY ME OR UDDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REli15TEREO ARCHITECT' UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION 011325 ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA IS MARCH 2018 UNIT 9 "architects & planners 2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 1 952.476,4434 - Fax 952.476.5863 nw@weberarchitects.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED RY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DL&Y RIEM- FRED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE NEIL WEBER, AIA REGISTRATION #11325 ORONO APARTMENTS 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MINNESOTA 18 MARCH 20 8 UNIT 10 architects & planners ".2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 - nw@weberarchitects.com A L)RUNU 4 APARTMENTS ELEVATIO 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY DRONO. MINNESOTA iff I ��� 111 ��.z I w#ww t■■t■■ 1■tt■ ■■■t' ■rfl■ t■ t■1 ■w■■ ■�r 0 ON IRS 111111V �t1■�y���r�■ rr � :�1 � �a �nlr ■■ ■ ■i�,r !� i! NEI!�us m; ORION MOI: am rr� '■SII ■` �:��'Willi ►r iif—Izt.t1-11111.tr�it,tTM 11 1-7 1 rw.l w�r ■�■'■�.■� ��,� 11 � 111►�� � � N r 11111111 ME �. awl Tl .rw till _�,. l.rr� ���� ; _ ' ! 111::,=i Ifiilf ONNEI dill i w i!i141� ... �t��AAA•1 Till A1111101 111 �I 111111! INV" m 0 0 54 ii "IIII1111111illllir "�`"""" - .moi: —T STONEBA BUILDING HEIGI 10 APARTME r ®ww wr�sw.wr�.i Fis ► l■ . r `Iq \� mom no �14 MON INS u■ ■� r• X31 moi+ 1111 / � .Irr no I � ■ �t � s 4 ... . 1.� wl r �I�■ � �1 r. ■ r� ■ r r _ al i■ , i . �� ..r.■.w _ lim ;111 Mom l f � �F"` o —mom NINh INo �Iw•rw�w.w --=7j _ ire!now , �Illfll' w� 111 11111. ON Ir WINES �--- ■ i. .. __,..�...,.: - 111..___x._.__•_. __. .__ 1 1I ( i �i �-) I iii II1:: '!III I �- HIGHPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENT ROOF 36'0" MIDPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENTS ROOF 30'0" f W 1 i.,. w.... i.».. Y ATI 0 i �f ORONO SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITY ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC Kelley Parkway o architects S plamiers 2280 Watertown Road, Long Lake, MN 55356-9419 952.476.4434 • Fax 952.476.5863 • nw@weberarchitects.com PC Exhibit F City of Orono 18-000036 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2 7 415 kr<ccEY .4Aitwx yF SHoa£ Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) CXE,41,4 7 -- Strep 1 s,X STIMG HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width -Survey(Square Total Feet (Example) Gara a (24'x 30' 720 S.F. A d. CIVA e. 7g2 S.F. 6 C� k S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover / I, 3,10 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See C4 Code Sec 78-9684 S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 t/ i o S.F. 4 Total Lot Area Y/ o S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)+(4)] j�a, ,' % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an infonnation packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein, however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8of9 City of Orono �Q Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2'741S A'E44Fr AA,Rlew r (wea rA 4 f rN/ rFrrr " G ES140&� Prepared by: Date: .. Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) CX Colo r Step 2. O DH DCOVE In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width -SurveySquare Total Feet) -(Example) (Garage) (24'x 30 720 S.F. A u/Gpi11-1/0'?V1V0 X/ -7YZ S.F. B 4#4km-'c / C'4'eA e Corgsej'7`1/.0,/70S.F. C 1 #-1 /.f tir60 6 g! S.F. L? 4401A CA ✓ VO S.F. E 4fletts (/'de, to L F j Z6,F6' S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H ST. I S.F. J S.F_ K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. D S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X I S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. Al)Total Proposed Hardcover is! 5 S. Excludable Hardcover See Citt Code Sec 78-1684 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover p S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 frr/ S.F. 4 Total Lot Area st / -?/ Q S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) +(4)] % Subdivision Application - January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 4r 112; a. . Jana Naomi Jf Nlr a L 9 �o �L a 4 EM LL Tfpchni ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC ENLARGED SITE LOCATION JLcn� Luke Genual' -" L.zm= .r ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC GENERAL SITE LOCATION Condos to the Northviest PC Exhibit H PC Exhibit 1 18-000036 DIVISION 11. - RPUD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTM Footnotes: --- (7) --- Cross reference— Planned unit development, § 78-1001 et seq. Sec. 78-621. - Purpose. The purpose of the residential planned unit development (RPUD) district is to provide a district which will allow for the implementation of certain residential housing goals established in the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan ("CMP" or "comprehensive plan"). The RPUD district is established to accommodate the densities and types of residential development contemplated in the CMP by incorporating the principles of the planned unit development concept. The RPUD district will encourage the following: (1) Flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; (2) Provision of housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and moderate cost housing needs; (3) Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses; (4) Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, poor soils and trees; (5) High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; (6) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city; and (7) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(1), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-622. - Exceptions. This section shall not apply to any residential PUD or PRD which has received preliminary or final approval by the city council prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this division is derived, unless such application is requested by the property owner and approved by the city council. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(9), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-623. - Permitted uses. Within the RPUD district, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) One -family detached dwellings. (2) Publicly owned parks and playgrounds. (3) Municipal buildings. (4) Multifamily attached dwellings only when consistent within the areas of the city designated as urban area in the comprehensive plan. (Code 1984, § 10.20(2); Ord. No. 202 2nd series § 1(2), 2-26-2001) State Law reference— State mandated permitted uses, Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 7. Sec. 78-624. - Conditional uses. Within the RPUD district, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: (1) Public service structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings, such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power substations, provided no building shall be located within 50 feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an R district. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. Public service structures that have been approved by the city at required public hearings for public improvement projects shall not require a conditional use permit, but such structures shall be subject to all other appropriate standards set forth in this section; amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of these structures will require written notice by the city to all affected property owners 14 days prior to the adoption of the amended plans by the council. Personal wireless services and commercial broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered public service structures. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall be reviewed for compliance with the PUD master development plan and with the applicable conditional use permit standards of this division. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall also be subject to site and building plan review pursuant to this division. (2) Assisted living facilities. Assisted living facilities as defined in this chapter, subject to the general conditions and multifamily -specific conditions applicable to uses in the RPUD district. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(3), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 75 3rd series, § 1, 7-12-2010) Sec. 78-62S. - Accessory uses. Within any RPUD district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (1) Private garages and parking space. (2) Private swimming pools, tennis courts, and paddocks. (3) Home occupations, as defined in this chapter. All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of section 78-1376, and the licensing provisions of section 26-76, when applicable. (4) Signs, as regulated in this chapter. (5) Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructing on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. (6) Gardening and other horticultural uses, including aviaries and decorative landscape features. (7) Communication reception/transmission devices as follows: a. Accessory antennas, which shall be limited to radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs, and amateur shortwave radio transmitting and receiving antennas. Accessory antennas that are accessory to the principal use of property are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: Height. A ground -mounted accessory antenna shall not exceed 20 feet in height from ground level. Yards. Accessory antennas shall not be located within the required front yard setback, corner side yard setback or side yard setback abutting a street. 3. Roofs. If vegetation or obstructions interfere with satellite signals at a location in any allowable placement area, the accessory antenna may be placed on the roof of any authorized structure on the premises. 4. Location. Accessory antennas shall not be located within a required yard or setback area or within drainage or utility easements. Antenna towers shall be set back from adjacent property lines a horizontal distance no less than the maximum height of the antenna. 5. Building permits. A building permit shall be required for the installation of any accessory antenna requiring a conditional use permit. Building permit applications shall be accompanied by a site plan and structural component data for the accessory antenna, including details of anchoring. The building official must approve the plans before installation. 6. Lightning protection. Each accessory antenna shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 7. Electrical code. Accessory antenna electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 8. Color/content. Accessory antennas shall be of a neutral color and shall not be used as signage. b. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers which do not meet the conditions for accessory antennas may be allowed with a conditional use permit in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: Height. When an amateur shortwave radio antenna is mounted on an antenna tower, the total height of the antenna and tower shall not exceed 65 feet. Yards. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within a front corner side or side yard. Setbacks. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within any required setback area and shall be located no less than the height of the antenna and town from the property line. (8) Privately owned buildings to be used for recreational or social purposes, or for use as storage areas for maintenance equipment or rubbish. (9) Other uses that are customarily incidental to, and subordinate to, the allowed permitted and conditional uses in this district. (Code 1984, § 10.20(4); Ord. No. 161 2nd series, § 6, 6-7-1997; Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1 (4), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 221 2nd series, § 3, 9-23-2002; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 12, 6-10-2013) Sec. 78-626. - Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in compliance with the following: (1) Minimum area; shoreland district limitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed by the existing zoning district. No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of a protected lake or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD. However, for a property that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially located more than 250 feet from the OHWL, the portion located more than 250 feet from the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other requirements are met. (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council for review. (3) Sewer availability. A site proposed to be rezoned to RPUD with proposed density greater than one unit per two acres must be in the metropolitan urban services area (MUSA) and must be serviced by municipal sewer. (4) Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. If the site is not designated in the comprehensive plan for residential use, the appropriate density shall be determined by the city based upon the city council's finding that such density is consistent with the intent of this division and of the comprehensive plan. Developments with proposed densities in excess of the densities contemplated in the comprehensive plan shall be allowed only on properties which are currently zoned and guided for commercial use, in order to maintain the character and integrity of the areas zoned and guided for residential use. (5) Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. Incentives may include modification of density (only for properties currently zoned and guided for commercial use) and floor area ratio requirements for developments providing lifecycle housing and affordable and moderate cost housing. Incentives for affordable and moderate cost housing may be approved by the city only after the developer and city have entered into an agreement to ensure that the low and moderate cost units remain available to persons of low and moderate income for at least 20 years. (6) Floor area ratio . Floor area ratios (FARs) shall be limited per the following table: Maximum Floor Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Ratio* Low or medium density residential (up to 50 and including 6.0 units per 0.5 acre) High density residential (in excess of 6.0 units per acre) 1.0 *FAR = Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area Individual lots within a development in the RPUD district may exceed these standards as long as the average meets these standards. (7) Development standards for attached and multifamily dwelling structures. Each site rezoned to RPUD and developed for attached or multiple -family dwelling uses shall be subject to the following standards: a. Setbacks and separation of uses. Within the RPUD district the setback for all attached and multifamily dwelling buildings and their accessory buildings from any bordering or abutting street line shall be 35 feet for local streets and 50 feet from railroad lines or collector or arterial streets, as designated in the comprehensive plan, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD site lot lines not abutting a public street shall be 35 feet, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. Building setbacks from internal public streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Parking lots and driving lanes shall be set back at least 20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a RPUD site. The setback for parking structures, including decks and ramps, shall be 35 feet from local streets and 50 feet from all other street classifications, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the structure. Parking structure setbacks from external lot lines shall be 50 feet or the height of the structure, whichever is greater, when adjacent to residential properties; 35 feet, when adjacent to nonresidential properties. Parking structure setbacks from internal public or private streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Where industrial uses abut developed or platted single-family lots outside the RPUD site, greater exterior building and parking setbacks may be required in order to provide effective screening. The city council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening proposed by the applicant. Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth berming, existing and proposed plantings and other features, such as roadways and wetlands, which provide separation of uses. Property rezoned to RPUD shall be considered a residential district for purposes of determining building and parking setback requirements on adjacent high density residential, commercial and industrial property outside the RPUD. b. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three stories (not including underground parking level) and shall maintain a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure. No mansard or flat roofed multiple -family building will be allowed. C. Outside storage limitations. Building materials, recreational vehicles, boats, RV's, snowmobiles, and other items of personal property shall not be stored outside within any site used for attached or multifamily uses. (8) Development standards for single-family detached dwellings in the RPUD district. Each RPUD site developed for single-family detached dwellings at medium density (i.e., densities ranging from one unit per acre to six units per acre) shall be subject to the following standards: a. Permitted locations: in areas of the city where smaller single-family detached dwelling lots will allow for clustering to preserve significant natural features, or in areas where a mixture of higher density attached dwellings and lower density detached single-family dwellings will result in a development that does not exceed the overall guided density. b. Minimum SFR lot size: 15,000 square feet. c. Minimum lot width at the setback line: 90 feet. d. Minimum lot depth: 125 feet. e. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet on internal streets within the RPUD site. On exterior or through streets a setback of 35 feet must be provided on local streets and a 50 -foot setback on collector or arterial streets, as defined in the comprehensive plan. f. Minimum side yard setback: ten feet along interior lot lines; 15 feet on lot lines along the exterior of the RPUD site. Side yards abutting streets must meet the minimum front yard setbacks as noted in subsection (8)e of this section. Structures in side yards abutting another residential zoning district shall meet the side yard setback requirement of the adjacent zoning district. g. Rear yard setback: minimum of 40 feet or 20 percent of the depth of the lot, whichever is less. h. Building height: maximum of 30 feet. i. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. j. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the state building code. k. Accessory structures shall conform to the setbacks established for principal structures, except as follows: 1. All accessory structures located more than ten feet from a principal structure may be located a minimum of ten feet from a rear or side lot line when that line does not abut a street right-of-way. 2. No accessory structure shall be located closer to the front lot line than the principal structure, regardless of the principal structure setback. I. No accessory structure shall occupy more than 30 percent of the side or rear yard in which it is located, nor exceed 1,000 square feet in area, nor exceed 12 feet in height. M. Off-street parking shall be provided for at least two vehicles for each single-family dwelling. A suitable location for a garage measuring at least 20 feet by 24 feet without a variance shall be provided and indicated as such on a site plan or certified site plan to be submitted when applying for a building permit to construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage. (9) More than one building allowed. More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in a RPUD site. (10) Single housing type permitted. Any RPUD development which involves a single housing type shall be permitted, provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this division and the comprehensive plan. (11) Private recreational area. Each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of the gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area shall be for active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. Private recreational area requirements are in addition to the standard park dedication requirements. (12) Ownership. All property to be included within a RPUD development shall be under unified ownership or control, or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved master development plan and final site and building plan. (13) Signage. Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in a sign plan approved by the city and shall be regulated by permanent covenants. (14) Landscaping, screening and buffering. a. Landscape plan requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the city, drawn to the scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: 1. Boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; 2. Locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads, trails and other improvements; 3. Proposed grading plan with two -foot contour intervals; 4. Location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; 5. A planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; 6. Planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; 7. Locations and details of other landscape features, including berms, fences and planter boxes; 8. Details of restoration of disturbed areas, including areas to be sodded and seeded; 9. Location and details of irrigation systems; and 10. Details and cross sections of all required screening. b. Minimum landscaping requirements. 1. All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives, trails or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of deciduous and coniferous species, including overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in conformance with the following table: Minimum Tree and Shrub Requirements Vegetation Type Size Quantity Overstory 2.5 -inch bb One tree per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint area or one deciduous trees (Caliper) tree per 40 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. height Coniferous trees 6 -foot tMinimum of 30 percent of required overstory trees must be coniferous bb Understory 3 -gal. potted One shrub per 300 gross square feet of building footprint area or one shrubs or 18 -inch shrub per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. Ornamental 1.5 -inch bb Not required; but two ornamental deciduous trees may be substituted deciduous trees (Caliper) for one required overstory deciduous tree (maximum substitution equals 25 percent of required overstory deciduous trees) Credits for existing trees: The city council shall have sole discretion whether credit shall be granted for existing healthy trees In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in subsection (14)b of this section may be adjusted by the city to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this division. A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. 3. All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2'/2 inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 1'/2 inches. 4. All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, trails, patios, or similar hardcover shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one- and two-family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas, except areas to be preserved in a natural state. Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. The city shall maintain a list of prohibited species, which shall not be used for landscaping. Interior parking lot landscaping. All parking lots containing over 100 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the city. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the 100 -stall standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the planning commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the planning commission. d. Maintenance of landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan, and which have died, shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. e. Retaining walls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height, and staged walls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than four tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. f. Landscaping performance security required. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this division, a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least 1'/2 times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal, contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to two full growing seasons after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be appropriate. If construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the owner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping, if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions, which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. g. Screening and buffering. The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this section: i. Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto used for residential uses at a density of greater than four units per acre shall be buffered from residential lots located in any R district. ii. Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet. Parking facilities shall be buffered with landscape zones. iii. Loading docks shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. iv. Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. V. Access roads serving multifamily buildings shall be screened as necessary to eliminate the impact of vehicle headlights shining toward adjacent residential neighborhoods. Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. 4. Screening or buffering required by subsection (14) of this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of subsection (14) of this section. Screening methods incorporating roofs over storage, trash or mechanical facilities to screen from higher adjacent properties or buildings may be required. Height of plantings required under subsection (14) of this section shall be measured at the time of installation. (15) Architectural standards. a. It is not the intent of the city to restrict design freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest of the city to promote high standards of architectural design and compatibility with surrounding structures and neighborhoods. Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified persons acceptable to the city and shall show the following for all structures other than single-family detached dwellings: 1. Elevations of all sides of the building. 2. Type and color of exterior building materials. 3. A typical floor plan. 4. Dimensions of all structures. 5. The location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. b. Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior materials for residential principal and accessory buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels. c. Accessory buildings shall be architecturally compatible with principal structures. d. All rooftop or ground -mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash and recycling storage areas shall be fully enclosed or screened so as to be not visible with materials compatible with the principal structure. e. Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and substantially renovated structures (the term "substantially renovated" shall mean when the renovations exceed 30 percent of the prerenovation value of the structure). (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. (17) Traffic studies. The city may require a traffic analysis to be prepared by a registered traffic engineer approved by the city to assess potential traffic impacts on local streets. If impacts on service levels of roadways and intersections are anticipated, the project will be approved only contingent upon a traffic management plan that adequately mitigates those impacts. The plan may include travel demand management strategies, use of transit facilities or other appropriate measures to reduce traffic generation, and necessary improvements to road systems. The developer shall have the responsibility to install all necessary road system improvements. (18) Building permits. No building or other permit shall be issued for any work on property included within a proposed or approved RPUD development, nor shall any work occur unless such work is in compliance with the proposed or approved RPUD development. (19) General regulations applicability. The requirements contained in this division pertaining to general regulations for residential districts and performance standards shall apply to a RPUD development as deemed appropriate by the city. (20) Lighting standards. All RPUD developments shall be subject to the general performance standards for lighting in this chapter. (21) Trails. When any portion of the project is within 1,000 feet of a public trail system, pedestrian access shall be provided to the trail system by means of a public trail constructed at the developer's expense. Where public rights-of-way are available, at the city's discretion the trail may utilize the public right-of-way. Trails shall be of bituminous construction, or such other material as may be approved by the city and shall be not less than eight feet in width. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(5), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 94 3rd series, § 2, 9-24-2012; Ord. No. 189 3rd series, § 6, 4-10-2017) Sec. 78-627. - Review of application; procedures. (a) Concept plan review. In order to receive guidance in the design of a RPUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large RPUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following: (1) Approximate building, road and trail locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized grading plan showing areas to be cut, filled and preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall address the consistency of the concept plan with this section. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall be for guidance only and, if positive, shall not be considered binding upon the planning commission or city council regarding approval of the formal RPUD application when submitted. (b) Master development plan and rezoning. Approval of a rezoning to RPUD and approval of a master development plan shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this chapter for a zoning map amendment. The master development plan shall contain the following: (1) Building location, height, bulk and square footage; (2) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (3) Number of dwelling units; (4) Detailed street and utility locations and sizes; (5) Parking layout; (6) Drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; (7) Grading plan and drainage plan, including two -foot contours; (8) Generalized landscape plan; (9) Generalized plan for uniform signs and lighting; (10) Plan for timing and phasing of the development; (11) Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; (12) Renderings or elevations of all sides of buildings to be constructed in the first phase of the development; (13) Trail plan; and (14) Lighting plan. Approval of the master development plan shall indicate approval of the listed items in subsections (b)(1)—(b)(14) of this section and shall occur in conjunction with rezoning of the property to RPUD. After rezoning the property to RPUD, nothing shall be constructed on the RPUD site except in conformance with the approved plans and this section. The procedure for notification of and public hearing on the master development plan shall be the same as required for a zoning map amendment by this chapter. (c) Development agreement/financial guarantee. Following the approval of the master development plan but prior to final plan approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city relating to the terms of the RPUD development, and shall also provide such financial guarantees as the city requires or deems necessary. Such agreement may take the form of: (1) A development contract; (2) A site improvement performance agreement; and/or (3) Another form of binding instrument as may be required by the city. (d) Final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan for the entire RPUD or for specific parts of the RPUD shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this division. The final site and building plan shall contain information as required by the city, including the following: (1) Detailed utility, street, grading and drainage plans; (2) Detailed building elevations and floor plans; (3) Detailed landscaping, sign and lighting plans; and (4) Detailed trail plan. (e) Substantial compliance. The final site and building plan shall be in substantial compliance with the approved master development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: (1) Buildings, parking areas, roads and trails are in substantially the same location as previously approved; (2) The number of residential living units has not increased or decreased from that approved in the master development plan; (3) The gross floor area of any individual building has not been increased from that approved in the master development plan; (4) There has been no increase in the number of stories in any building; (5) Open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original design or intended use; and (6) All special conditions required on the master development plan by the city have been incorporated into the final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans necessary prior to application for a building permit, subject to conformance with any conditions on the approval and subject to other necessary approvals by the city. (f) Simultaneous review. Applicants may combine the final site and building plan review with the master development plan review by submitting all information required for both stages simultaneously. (g) Basis for approval, conditions. In evaluating a site and building plan, the planning commission and city council shall base their recommendations and actions regarding approval of a RPUD on a consideration of the following: (1) Compatibility of the proposed plan with this section and consistency with the goals, policies, and objectives of the comprehensive plan and surface water management plan; (2) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the greatest extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general character and appearance of neighboring properties; (3) Creation of compatible relationships between buildings and open spaces both on the site and adjacent to it, incorporating natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development, giving special attention to: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community. b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (4) Promotion of energy conservation through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading; (5) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; and (6) Such other factors as the planning commission or city council deem relevant. The planning commission and city council may attach such conditions to their actions as they shall determine necessary or convenient to better accomplish the purposes of this section. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(6), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-628. - Term of approval. (a) If application has not been made for a final site and building plan approval pursuant to the approved master development plan for all or a part of the property within a RPUD by December 31 of the year following the date on which the RPUD zoning map amendment became effective or, if within that period no extension of time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of a rezoning, the approved master development plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (b) If construction on the property included within an approved final site and building plan has not started by December 31 of the year following the date on which such final site and building plan was approved or, if building construction in a phase of a RPUD approved to be built in phases has not started within this period, or, if within that period no extension of the time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of rezoning, the approved master development plan and final site and building plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(7), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-629. - Amendments. Major amendments to an approved master development plan may be approved by the city council after review by the planning commission. The notification and public hearing procedure for such amendment shall be the same as for approval of the original RPUD. A major amendment is any amendment which: (1) Substantially alters the location of buildings, parking areas or roads; (2) Increases or decreases the number of residential dwelling units; (3) Increases the gross floor area of any individual building; (4) Increases the number of stories of any building; (5) Decreases the amount of open space or alters it in such a way as to change its original design or intended use; or (6) Creates noncompliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. Any other amendment may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the council. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(8), 2-26-2001) Secs. 78-630-78-640. - Reserved. PC Exhibit J MINUTES OF THE 18-000036 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 12, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 18. #18-4002 JOHN PATCH O/B/O BERKSHIRE PARTNERS, 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY, CONCEPT PLAN, APARTMENT BUILDING, 8:26 P.M. — 9:00 P.M. Barnhart stated this is a sketch plan review and involves a proposed land use plan and zoning map amendment to allow a 56 -unit apartment building. The site is platted and currently guided for office use and is zoned for Highway Commercial Uses. An apartment building would require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The building is designed to meet the height limits of 30 feet, though the final determination will be made when a full grading plan and architectural plans are developed. Parking will be provided both above ground and underground. Approximately 14 spaces of the surface lot are shared with the dentist/medical office to the west. Even with the shared parking, the site meets the parking requirements for the proposed use. The property will be rezoned to RPUD and tied to the Stonebay development across the street to meet size requirements. Staff anticipates a similar design palette to the Stonebay project. The net development density based on 56 units on the 2.55 -acre parcel would be 21.9 units per acre. The highest density anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan is high density residential at 10 to 15 units per acre. The senior housing project to the east was approved at 20 units per acre. Density at this level will help the City meet its work force housing and density goals established in the Comprehensive Plan and could allow for lower densities elsewhere. Seals asked what is meant by work force housing. Barnhart stated work force housing is not defined in the City Code and that it is likely the people who will be renting will be people who work in the area and perhaps do not have the ability to afford a large home. Barnhart noted the developer is not requesting any subsidy and the City is not offering any. Crosby asked what the rents will be. Patch indicated the rents will be market rate, meaning that the one -bedroom apartments will probably rent in the $1,100 to $1,300 range and the two-bedroom apartments will be between $1,400 to $1,600 per month. Walsh noted Staff has laid out five issues for discussion. Walsh asked whether the Council feels this site should be rezoned to residential. Printup stated one of the reasons it was zoned business was to help keep the density down. Walsh stated higher density on this site would give the City more flexibility on other developments. Walsh noted the Council approved lower density on the Orono Preserve development with the idea that higher density could be built elsewhere. Seals stated she does not believe the residents will want the higher density. Page 1 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 12, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh noted there is basically the same density with the senior housing and that this building will stay at the same height as Stonebay so it will not look out of place. Dankey commented the density will also impact the school district. Crosby asked what the ramifications are from the Metropolitan Council if they do not approve higher density. Barnhart stated the City will be submitting a Comprehensive Plan Update later this year and that it is a possibility the Metropolitan Council will not approve that if the City does not meet its density and affordable housing goals. Barnhart noted currently there is quite a bit of density in the Navarre area and that higher density in the Navarre area is probably misplaced due to the traffic levels. Barnhart stated the City should try to provide more affordable housing options and that they are looking at this site as one option. Seals stated there are some areas in Orono that offer affordable housing but that she struggles with the Metropolitan Council dictating what happens in this area. Seals asked what would happen if the City Council does not approve this. Dankey stated the City Council also needs to consider whether Orono is willing to expand the schools as well if higher density is approved. Barnhart stated the school district obtains an understanding of the new growth in the area from the City and that part of the formal Comprehensive Plan Update process does involve the school district. Barnhart stated the question for tonight is whether the City is open to changing the zoning on this site. Walsh noted this development is consistent with the area. Seals stated she is hesitant to allowing the Metropolitan Council to drive the density in Orono since people move out to this area to get away from the higher density. Walsh noted next door there is a senior housing project as well as the Stonebay development, which are basically two apartment complexes. Walsh asked whether the Council agrees that there is justification for changing the zoning. Rief stated based on the Navarre Area Study, there is plenty of office space in the metro area and that it is unlikely someone will come out here and build an office complex. Printup stated the Council might want to re -discuss at a work session the possibility of sending a letter to the Metropolitan Council in conjunction with other cities about their density goals. Printup stated this location is probably more appropriate than in the middle of another neighborhood. Walsh stated the Council is looking at changing this site from office to residential and getting credit for the density. Crosby stated he is on the fence because that gives the okay for more density. Page 2 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 12, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated the City has identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that higher density will go in the Navarre area. Staff is suggesting higher density should be put on this site rather than in the Navarre area because the rationale is that this is a better location for it. Crosby concurred that if the City is going to have higher density, this would be a better spot for it. Walsh stated as it relates to Item B, it would be consistent with what has already been approved next door and would be in character with the area. Walsh pointed out if this development is approved, the City could go with lower density elsewhere. Walsh noted the City also does not have the sewer and water issues to deal with at this location. Barnhart noted this site was identified in 2008 for new growth. Barnhart stated out of the seven areas that were identified for growth, all were within the MUSA area. Barnhart noted the City expected Orono Preserve to come in at seven units per acre, which actually came in at three units per acre. If the City still wants to provide access to municipal sewer near the lake and provide sanitary sewer access to Area E, the Metropolitan Council requires that the minimum density be three units per acre in order for the sewer to be extended. In addition, the City anticipated the Eisinger property would be developed at 10 to 15 units per acre but the proposal came in at five units per acre. Barnhart stated the challenge is the City's density rate is dropping, which means the City is in danger of not being able to provide sanitary sewer to the properties on Fox Street and other areas. Barnhart stated the City does not want to see high density along the lake and that this project will help bump the City's density rate up and allow the sanitary sewer to be extended to those identified areas. Barnhart stated Staff is trying to add density in a strategic way as well as providing sanitary sewer where it is deemed appropriate. Seals commented the issue is that the City Council does not want to provide areas for higher density. Barnhart noted the Metropolitan Council has to approve the Comprehensive Plan and that he would be cautious about how that issue is raised with them. Dankey asked whether that density number could ever be renegotiated. Dankey stated the fact that Orono provides a lot of tax dollars to the Metropolitan Council should be given some weight. Barnhart stated the City addressed that density number in 2015 and that the Metropolitan Council modified the number slightly. Barnhart stated zero growth is not an option and that Orono has been building 40 new houses a year for the last 15 years. Barnhart stated Orono has growth but it is not at a rate like Plymouth. Walsh asked whether the City Council is okay with the higher density. Crosby stated Staff made some excellent points, and that while he might not like it, he is more comfortable with it. It was the consensus of the City Council to be open to a donation to the park dedication fund in lieu of a 10 percent private recreation space. Page 3 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 12, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh stated this proposal is probably the best solution to the City's density number and that he cannot think of another site in Orono where a 60 -unit apartment building can be built. The City Council took no formal action on this item. Page 4 of 4 PC Exhibit K 18-000036 From: James Van Eyll To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Re: Apartment building Date: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:46:14 AM Attachments: 1461960826 Instagram. ono 1461958277 square-linkedin.png PastedGraphic-Itiff Hi Jeremy, I don't see any problems with this as long as they meet all fire codes. Some minor problems are access to the backside of the building. I don't know what the setback is fro Co Rd 112. They might have to put a hydrant inside the complex so that we can have one near the FDC. This might change due to the type of fire suppress system that is installed or the type of construction materials used. Thanks James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvane, ll longlakemn.gov I On Apr 11, 2018, at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart a,ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Chief, Can you add any comments to this proposed apartment building proposed at 2745 Kelley Parkway, next door to the dentist office? <18 March 2018 First Floor Plan.pdf><l6 March 2018 Site Plan .pdf><18 March 2018 Elevations.pdf> PC Exhibit L Hennepon County Locate & Noffy Map 18-000036 Date: 3/22/2018 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I t I I t t t I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Ct (93) 7 rt 7�5 00 o! 6 V1 may. L U 2 0 (31-87) 1 10M'M11111111111111111KIelley<.pkc, Y 2765 (2) 2635 (s) 580 1 550 2725 2687 26 5 580 k 570 560 550 550 2725 540 i (21) 2605 530 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I t I I t t t I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE: 03/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 33-118-23 12 0002 38 33-118-23 12 0036 38 33-118-23 12 0046 PROFESSIONAL PROP ORONO LLP CRAIG M FELBER/MARY M FELBER PATRICIA A RUYF TRUSTEE 2765 KELLEY PKWY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 106 2670 KELLEY PKWY 116 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 PROFESSIONAL PROP ORONO LLP CRAIG M FELBER PATRICIA A RUYF 835 PARTENWOOD RD MARY M FELBER 2024 SHOREWOOD LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #106 MOUND MN 55364 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0004 38 33-118-23 12 0037 38 33-118-23 12 0047 CITY OF ORONO R W CASWELL & M K K CASWELL A C LEIDING & C LEIDING 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2670 KELLEY PKWY 107 2670 KELLEY PKWY 117 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CITY OF ORONO RICHARD W CASWELL ALAN C & CHRISTINE LEIDING 1335 BROWN RD S MARY K KILLORIN CASWELL 2670 KELLEY PKWY #117 WAYZATA MN 55391 2670 KELLEY PKWY #107 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0007 38 33-118-23 12 0038 38 33-118-23 12 0048 H R A CITY OF ORONO LISA A BISHOP V V KLITZKA & G A KLITZKA 2700 KELLEY PKWY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 108 2670 KELLEY PKWY 118 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 H R A CITY OF ORONO JOHN J HOVANEC GERALD KLITZKA 2700 KELLEY PKWY SARALEE W HOVANEC VICTORIA KLITZKA LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #108 2670 KELLEY PKWY #118 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0008 38 33-118-23 12 0039 38 33-118-23 12 0049 BERKSHIRE PARTNERS LLP CAROL A ALLEN REV TRUST KATHERINE POLEY 2745 KELLEY PKWY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 109 2670 KELLEY PKWY 201 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BERKSHIRE PARTNERS LLP CAROL A ALLEN KATHERINE POLEY 835 PASTENWOOD RD 2670 KELLEY PKWY #109 2670 KELLEY PKWY #201 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0009 38 33-118-23 12 0040 38 33-118-23 12 0050 APEX HOLDINGS LLC R H ROELOFS & J D ROELOFS ELIZABETH ILONA SIMS 2635 KELLEY PKWY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 110 2670 KELLEY PKWY 202 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 APEX HOLDINGS LLC RONALD H ROELOFS ELIZABETH SIMS 16135 55TH AVE N JACQUELINE D ROELOFS 2670 KELLEY PKWY #202 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 2670 KELLEY PKWY #110 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0031 38 33-118-23 12 0041 38 33-118-23 12 0051 W P DEASE & C A DEASE R FISCHBACH & J FISCHBACH CEKIEL DUANE DANIELSON ET AL 2670 KELLEY PKWY 101 2670 KELLEY PKWY 111 2670 KELLEY PKWY 203 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 WILLIAM P & CHERYL A DEASE ROGER FISCHBACH CEKIEL DUANE DANIELSON 2670 KELLEY PKWY #101 JANIS FISCHBACH JILL L DANIELSON LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #111 2670 KELLEY PKWY #203 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0032 38 33-118-23 12 0042 38 33-118-23 12 0052 ANN L ROETTGER DEBORAH A CARLSON KATHLEEN V LEACH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 102 2670 KELLEY PKWY 112 2670 KELLEY PKWY 204 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ANN L ROETTGER DEBORAH A CARLSON KATHLEEN V LEACH 2670 KELLEY PKWY #102 2670 KELLEY PKWY #112 2670 KELLEY PKWY #204 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0033 38 33-118-23 12 0043 38 33-118-23 12 0053 KATHRYN Y DURYEA TRUST LINDA S WISMER D E TERRY & L K TERRY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 103 2670 KELLEY PKWY 113 2670 KELLEY PKWY 205 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 KATHRYN Y DURYEA LINDA S WISMER DEAN E TERRY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #103 2670 KELLEY PKWY #113 LESLEY K TERRY LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 2675 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391 38 33-118-23 12 0034 38 33-118-23 12 0044 38 33-118-23 12 0054 CONSTANCE M PERSONS TJC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC TODD HAUGAN/TERESA HAUGEN 2670 KELLEY PKWY 104 2670 KELLEY PKWY 114 2670 KELLEY PKWY 206 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CONSTANCE M PERSONS TJC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC TODD R HAUGAN 2670 KELLEY PKWY #104 404 SPADARO DR TERESA J HAUGAN LONG LAKE MN 55356 VENICE FL 34285 2670 KELLEY PKWY #206 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0035 38 33-118-23 12 0045 38 33-118-23 12 0055 MICHAEL E & PAMELA J LINK KIM A GOWDY/ELIN KAY S GOWDY MARK BAUER & DEBRA BAUER 2670 KELLEY PKWY 105 2670 KELLEY PKWY 115 2670 KELLEY PKWY 207 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL E & PAMELA J LINK KIM A GOWDY MARK BAUER & DEBRA BAUER 2670 KELLEY PKWY #105 ELIM KAY S GOWDY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #207 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #115 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 03/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 33-118-23 12 0056 38 33-118-23 12 0066 38 33-118-23 12 0076 M GUBERUD & B J GUBERUD HAZEL J KUJAWA S G S-HEISER/ROBERT J HEISER 2670 KELLEY PKWY 208 2670 KELLEY PKWY 218 2670 KELLEY PKWY 308 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 M ROBERT GUBERUD HAZEL J KUJAWA SHARON G STEPHENSON-HEISER BARBARA J GUBERUD P O BOX 310 ROBERT J HEISER 2670 KELLEY PKWY #208 SYLVANIA OH 43560 2670 KELLEY PKWY #308 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0057 38 33-118-23 12 0067 38 33-118-23 12 0077 ELIZABETH CARPENTER DUFF EUGENE R KUEHN PATRICK G LYNCH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 209 2670 KELLEY PKWY 219 2670 KELLEY PKWY 309 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ELIZABETH CARPENTER DUFF EUGENE R KUEHN PATRICK G LYNCH 2670 KELLEY PKWY #209 2670 KELLEY PKWY #219 2670 KELLEY PKWY #309 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0058 38 33-118-23 12 0068 38 33-118-23 12 0078 JACK VACCARO/SHEILA VACCARO CORY C MORTENSON DANELLE J WOLF & MARK T WOLF 2670 KELLEY PKWY 210 2670 KELLEY PKWY 220 2670 KELLEY PKWY 310 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JACK VACCARO/SHEILA VACCARO CORY C MORTENSON MARK T & DANELLE J WOLF 2670 KELLEY PKWY #210 4820 QUANTICO LN N 2670 KELLEY PKWY #310 LONG LAKE MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0059 38 33-118-23 12 0069 38 33-118-23 12 0079 DAVID QUIGLEY TRUST H B DETTLOFF & J L DETTLOFF BARBARA J VOORHEES 2670 KELLEY PKWY 211 2670 KELLEY PKWY 301 2670 KELLEY PKWY 311 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID QUIGLEY TRUSTEE HOWARD B & JEAN L DETTLOFF BARBARA J VOORHEES 4203 BAY BEACH LANE #3C 2670 KELLEY PKWY #301 2670 KELLEY PKWY #311 FORT MYERS BEACH FL 33931 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0060 38 33-118-23 12 0070 38 33-118-23 12 0080 JANE KENNEDY & DAVID BENSON THOMAS M WICK HELEN S WALDRON 2670 KELLEY PKWY 212 2670 KELLEY PKWY 302 2670 KELLEY PKWY 312 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JANE KENNEDY & DAVID BENSON THOMAS WICK HELEN S WALDRON 2670 KELLEY PKWY #212 2670 KELLEY PKWY #302 2670 KELLEY PKWY #312 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0061 38 33-118-23 12 0071 38 33-118-23 12 0081 J A OBERSTAR/A J OBERSTAR LEONID FROLOV R H MURPHEY & JUNE M MURPHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 213 2670 KELLEY PKWY 303 2670 KELLEY PKWY 313 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOHN A OBERSTAR LEONID FROLOV ROBERT H MURPHEY ANTHONY J OBERSTAR 2670 KELLEY PKWY #303 JUNE M MURPHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY #213 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #313 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0062 38 33-118-23 12 0072 38 33-118-23 12 0082 BRETT OSLUND & DIANE OSLUND R & S HAEGELE REVOC TRUST DONNA KJONAAS & MURRAY SMITH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 214 2670 KELLEY PKWY 304 2670 KELLEY PKWY 314 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRETT OSLUND RANULPH F HAEGELE DONNA MAE KJONAAS 7511 PLEIN AIRE SANDRA L HAEGELE MURRAY T SMITH SAN DIEGO CA 92127 2670 KELLEY PKWY #304 2670 KELLEY PKWY #314 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0063 38 33-118-23 12 0073 38 33-118-23 12 0083 L A SCHWARTZ & D C SCHWARTZ RICHARD & LILA MOBERG MATTHEW J LATSON ET AL 2670 KELLEY PKWY 215 2670 KELLEY PKWY 305 2670 KELLEY PKWY 315 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LARRY ALBERT SCHWARTZ RICHARD & LILA MOBERG DANIEL B LARSON DEEANNE CARYNE SCHWARTZ 2670 KELLEY PKWY #305 1160 CO RD 19 2670 KELLEY PKWY #215 LONG LAKE MN 55356 MAPLE PLAINMN 55359 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0064 38 33-118-23 12 0074 38 33-118-23 12 0084 L 0 HARRELL & MARY A HARRELL LOUISE N KANIVE REVOC TRUST KATHERINE A NORTHEY 2670 KELLEY PKWY 216 2670 KELLEY PKWY 306 2670 KELLEY PKWY 316 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LEONARD 0 HARRELL LOUISE N KANIVE REVOC TRUST ROBIN M MOHN MARY A HARRELL 2670 KELLEY PKWY #306 2670 KELLEY PKWY #316 2670 KELLEY PKWY #216 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0065 38 33-118-23 12 0075 38 33-118-23 12 0085 CLINTON BROVIAK PAUL N JENSEN/LORRI A JENSEN CARRIE A KAMINSKI 2670 KELLEY PKWY 217 2670 KELLEY PKWY 307 2670 KELLEY PKWY 317 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CLINTON BROVIAK PAUL N JENSEN CARRIE A KAMINSKI 2670 KELLEY PKWY #217 LORRI A JENSEN 2670 KELLEY PKWY #317 LONG LAKE MN 55356 2670 KELLEY PKWY #307 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 03/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 3 38 33-118-23 12 0086 SHIRLEY PYLE 2670 KELLEY PKWY 318 ORONO MN 55356 SHIRLEY PYLE 2670 KELLEY PKWY #318 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0087 J B ROTSCH & S E S ROTSCH 2670 KELLEY PKWY 319 ORONO MN 55356 JAMES B & SUSANNE E S ROTSCH 9833 EAST SUNRIDGE DR CHANDLER AZ 85248 38 33-118-23 12 0093 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 THE STONEBAY COMM ASSOC 2670 KELLEY PKWY #115 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 13 0002 ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2687 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCH DISTR #278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 13 0015 WJM PROPERTIES LLC 2605 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 WJM PROPERTIES LLC ATTN GREGORY W WAGENER 12550 WAYZATA BLVD MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 33-118-23 13 0019 METRO STORAGE ORONO LLC 2725 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 METRO STORAGE HHF VENTURE METRO STORAGE LLC 13528 BOULTON BLVD LAKE FOREST IL 60045 38 33-118-23 13 0021 PINE CORNER PROPERTIES LLC 550 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 PINE CORNER PROPERTIES LLC 550 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. ��E�TIFI��ATE c�F AILI G STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. CITY OF ORONO ) I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #18-000036 was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 30th day of March, 2018. yjr Mo ica A. Fadness RLCLEWED AHK 10 ZU18 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit M 18-000036 April 10, 2018 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Pkwy Orono, MN 55356 Dear Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing to express my disagreement to amend the existing commercial zoning in order to allow for a high density apartment building at 2745 Kelley Pkwy. I recently purchased a condominium across the street at Stone Bay of Orono. Prior to this I was a resident of Long Lake for thirteen years. It is my understanding that the building would be a high end luxury property. However, due to the transient nature of renters my concern is that the long-term upkeep would dissolve. Another concern is that of section eight housing requirements that may be required. Does Orono have background checks in place for this due to the proximity to the school district? I have chosen to live in Orono due to the high quality of life and safety standards. I will be here for many years to come and an apartment building can only detract from these standards. I definitely approve of maintaining the existing commercial zoning law and would be in favor of any office or retail space. Thank you for your time. Regards, Carrie Kaminski Item 8 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director April Date: 16, 2018 Subject: #LA18-000024, City of Orono Text Amendment: Definitions Public Hearing Application Summary: The city is considering an ordinance that would add or amend definitions applicable to the zoning ordinance. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should consider the proposed changes to definitions. Background Definitions form the foundation of interpreting and applying zoning ordinance regulations. Through the course of applying these regulations, it becomes evident that the definitions need to be reviewed and when necessary, updated, to reflect community goals. Staff has identified 7 additions or amendments to the zoning ordinance definitions. These nine are still being reviewed, and additional changes may be introduced as review continues. The Planning Commission is asked to give additional feedback, formal recommendation will be requested in April. Animal Unit: Amended definition. Occasionally, staff is asked to identify the number of alpaca, goats or pigs that equal an animal unit. Animal unit is useful in determining the number of farm animals per acre. Building Height: Amended definition. The change proposed removes the height calculation based on the location of the highest window, which does nothing to impact mass, which building height is intended to address. Building cornice. New definition. Building height calls on the location of a building cornice in certain roof types. Building cornice isn't defined. Dry -buildable. Not currently defined. Dry buildable is useful in determining the number of lots possible given a particular property, and is necessary in preparing subdivision plans. Dwelling. Amended definition. The change is intended to clarify the difference between renting a couple of bedrooms (allowed via the rental licensing program) and a second unit of bed, bath, kitchen, and living areas, which is not. Family. Amended definition. Intended to clarify the difference between one and 2 family dwelling units. FILE # LA18-000024 April 16, 2018 Page 2 of 2 In-kind: New definition. Critical in replacing non -conforming structures and buildings. The Commission may adopt all or parts of the proposed ordinance. The intent with the draft definitions is not to change practice, but merely to clarify current practice or provide appropriate direction to address comments recently generated. New text is shown underlined, and text to be deleted is shown StFUG'449blgI4. Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft definitions PC Exhibit A LA18-000024 April 16, 2018 1 ORDINANCE NO. 196, THIRD SERIES 2 3 CITY OF ORONO 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 7 PERTAINING TO DEFINITIONS WETLAND REGULATIONS 8 9 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: 10 SECTION 1. Section 78-1 Definitions shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 11 follows: 12 Animal Unit: Animal unit means, for one animal unit equivalency, one cow or steer; one horse, donkey 13 alpaca, or llama; two pigs, three sheep or goats; or 25 fowl. 14 Building Height: Building height means the vertical distance between the highest existing ground level 15 or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the top of the cornice of a flat roof, 16 or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round or other arch -type roof, or the 17 median height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate 18 the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building 19 height. 20 Cornice means any horizontal decorative molding that crowns a building or wall. 21 Dry Buildable: Dry Buildable means that portion of the lot not encumbered by the waters of a duly 22 recorded lake or river, wetlands, bluffs, or slopes greater than 18%. 23 Dwelling: Dwelling means a building or part of a building containing independent living, sleeping, 24 housekeeping accommodations, and sanitary facilities for occupancy by one family, intended to be 25 occupied exclusively for residence purposes, but not including rooms in motels, hotels, nursing 26 homes, boardinghouses, nor trailers, tents, cabins or trailer coaches. A dwelling shall not be 27 interpreted to include lodging rooms. 28 Family: Family means any number of individuals generally, but not necessarily, related by blood and/ 29 or marriage, living together at one location maintaining a common household as a single, nonprofit 30 housekeeping unit, as distinguished from a group occupying a boardinghouse or rooming house, hotel 31 or motel. 32 In -Kind: In-kind, when used in the context of replacement of a non -conforming building or 33 structure, means the replacement of a building or structure completely within the limits (location, height, 34 width, and depth) of the previous building or structure. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall 35 take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. 36 ADOPTED this day of , 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City 37 Council of Orono, Minnesota. 38 ATTEST: 39 40 41 42 Anna Carlson, City Clerk 43 44 Dennis Walsh, Mayor 45 Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2018.