Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2968 O O 44AL, O CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SH0 NO. 2968 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TOs MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE ` w ,w SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5(B) FILE #1545 WHEREAS , Tom and Mary Lou Lutz (hereinafter "the applicants" ) are owners of the property located at 258 Cygnet Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows : Lot 10, Block 3, Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property") ; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a 3-season porch to be located 21' from the south side lot line where a 30' side setback is normally required, and to permit the construction of a 7.5' high screening wall attached to the house, such wall being proposed 48' from the rear lot line and 28' from the east side lot line where 50' and 30' setbacks respectively are normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1545. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variance on a vote of 7 to 0, based upon the following findings: a) The triangular shape of the lot and the orientation of the perceived rear of the house against what is technically considered a side lot line, make this a unique lot. Page 1 of 5 r y w /O O y CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2968 kESH0 N O. g� b) While this lot is approximately 0.6 acres in area in a 2 acre zone, the property was developed prior to the 2 acre standards, at a time when the side setback requirement was only 10 ' . c) There is a pre-existing deck at the proposed location of the screened porch. d) There is adequate vegetative screening and distance between applicant's residence and the neighboring property to the southwest such that the proposed additions will not have a negative visual impact on the neighborhood. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10. 28 , Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a 3-season porch addition to the south side of the residence, such addition being 21' from the south side lot line where a 30' setback is normally required, and granting variances to permit the construction of 7.5' high screening wall to be located 28' from the east side lot line and 48' from the rear lot line, where setbacks of 30' and 50' respectively are normally required, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO C� G RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��kEs to NO. 2968 1. Applicants are advised that the City will not look favorably on future setback variances in the south yard of this residence. 2. Any changes in plans from those reviewed as part of this application may be subject to further City review. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval , or this variance will expire on that date (June 10, 1992). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 4V O O :f CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2968 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of June, 1991. AT ST: o othy allin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor i Property wner(s ) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of June, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. THERESA L. NAAB / G �✓"— NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA l HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires 9-8-92 Notary Public Page 4 of 5 O O CITY of ORONO �� 41RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��kESH�g NO, 2968 STATEifiI�NESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On thisr1 day of 199/ before me a Not�ry Public within and4fo --i—aid county, personally appeared (,1��1 /1lc 4' h�-rna z� rn.t % r% known to me to be cuted the foregoing the person(s�) described in and who exe instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC THERESA L NAAS EENOTARY PUBUO•MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission 9*im 9.8.92 MY COMMISSION EXPTR STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1991 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s ) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they ) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 RESOLUTION #2968 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallin , City Clerk of the City of Orono , Hennepin County , Minnesota , do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on _ June 10 , 1991 , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting . In Witness Whereof , I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 11th day of June 19 91 dor thy M. (Jilin , City Clerk (SEAL)