The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResults of Septic Certification r9 RUSTY OLSON'S SOIL AND PERC. TESTING 11481 Riverview Rd. NE - HANOVER, MN 55341 Phone 763-498-8779 - Fax 763-498-8290 Joseph J. Olson--MPCA license #810 September 01,2005 Darrel Anderson 920 W. Wayzata Blvd. Orono, Hennepin County. To whom it may concern, I was contacted by Darrel Anderson to perform a Septic certification on the property at 920 W. Wayzata Blvd... In the City of Orono. The results of the Septic certification are as follows. Soil borings on the property(920 W. Wayzata Blv Indicate that the Septic system does not conform to the Two foot separation rule from the seasonally saturated soils. Therefore due to the less than Two feet separation to the seasonally saturated soils and that the system is currently overloaded the existing trench system is in a state of noncompliance to Chapter 7080. This system is currently not an imminent public health threat. By city code. This system must be upgraded by the year 2010 or if it becomes an imminent public health threat Soil boring#1 Elv.-91.7 the seasonal high saturated soils or mottled soils were located At Elv.-90.8 Ground at rock trench#1 is at Ely- 92.1, Bottom of the rock is at Elv-87.8 Ground at rock trench#3 is at Elv.-91.4, Bottom of the rock is at Ely-87.8 If you have any questions please call. Sincerely Joseph J. Olson 1/29/02 Water/Wastewater-ISTS4.31 Compliance Inspection Form for Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Completion of this form fulfills the minimal requirements of Minn. Stat. § 115.55(2001)and Minnesota R. ch. 7080(1999). Please refer to local ordinances for other requirements or information, especially for compliance requirements for bedroom additions. General: Date of Inspection: 8/31/05 REASON for inspection: Property Transfer Property Owner(s) Darrel Anderson Telephone (952) 473-1924 Person requesting inspection: Same Telephone ( ) Site Address: 920 W. Wayzata Blvd. City: Orono Zip Code 55391 Fire No./ Parcel No. County: Hennepin Township: Legal Description Local Regulatory Authority: City of Orono Date system constructed: unknown System in Shoreland Area: _f!..9 no System in Wellhead Protection Area: yeses System serving a MDH licensed facility: yes E.:9 Local Permit # (if any) Systems built prior to April 1, 1996 and not located in Systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or Serving a Food, Areas or Serving a Food, Beverage or Lodging Beverage or Lodging Establishment Establishment, or systems Built after March 31, 1996 Is the system an imminent threat to public health or Is the system an imminent threat to public health safety? (a yes answer is an ITPHS system) or safety? (a yes answer is an ITPHS system) - Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YES NO - Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YES OP -Discharge of sewage to draintile or surface waters? YES NO - Discharge of sewage to draintile or surface waters?YES 0 -Sewage backup into dwelling? YES NO - Sewage backup into dwelling? YES it, -Situation with the potential to immediately and -Situation with the potential to immediately and adversely impact or threaten public health or adversely impact or threaten public health or safety? YES NO safety? YES (NO Is the system failing? (a yes answer is a failing system) Is the system failing? (a yes answer is a failing system) - Less than TWO feet of vertical separation between - Less than THREE feet of vertical separation between system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? YES NO system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? /1"ES NO -A seepage pit, cesspool,drywell, or leaching pit? YES NO -A seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit? SES NO Is the system non-compliant? Is the system non-compliant? - Is the system regulated under a monitoring plan or - Is the system regulated under a monitoring plan or operating permit? (if no, go to page 2) YES NO operating permit? (if no, go to page 2) YES Na If yes, If yes, - Has the required monitoring taken place? YES NO - Has the required monitoring taken place? YES NO (If no, the system is non-complying) (If no, the system is non-complying) -The monitoring indicate that the system meets -The monitoring indicate that the system meets performance expectations? YES NO performance expectations? YES NO (If no, the system is non-complying) (If no, the system is non-complying) Page 1 of 2 wq-wwists4.31 Property Owner(s) Darrel Anderson Site Address: 920 W. Wayzata Blvd. System Components (Please describe the system components): 2-Seepage Pits, 3 approximately 60 foot long trenches What methods were used to make the determinations for the compliance inspection? (Note:No standard protocol exists. The fol owing list is not exhaustive, not in sequential order nor indicates which combinations are necessary to make a determination) Watertight tank(s) Hydraulic Functioning Vertical Separation Distance ❑ Probed tank bottom eet Searched for surface outlet m Conducted soil borings ❑ Observed low liquid level U Performed hydraulic test Depth to limiting layer 70. U Examined const. records 03 Searched for seeping in yard Depth to system bottom g7, U Examined empty(pumped)tank ❑ Checked for back-up in home U Examined records ■ Probed outside tank for"black soil" s$ Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes U LGU Limiting Layer Verification ❑ Pressure/vacuum check a Homeowner testimony U Other ❑ Other U Examined for surging in tank a "Black soil"above soil system U Other Status of the system Based on the compliance criteria,the system status is: (check one) ® failing (to protect groundwater) ❑ an imminent threat to public health or safety (ITPHS), ❑ non-compliant (monitoring issue). ❑ compliant (non-of the 3 previous conditions). Is this system a EPA Class V Injection Well? ❑ yes I® no Therefore,this document is a: ❑ Certificate of Compliance I Notice of Noncompliance Certification I hereby certify as a state of Minnesota licensed Inspector and/or Designer I or Qualified Employee Inspector and/or Qualified Employee Designer I that I conducted an investigation that accurately determined the compliance status of this system and that my recorded observations are accurate as of this date. No determination of future hydraulic performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. Inspector's name(print) Joseph J Olson Phone: (763)498-8779 License and/or Registration Number 810 Address: 11481 Riverview Road NE.,Hanover, MN. 55341 Employed by: Rpsty Olson's Soil &Percolation Testing Address: 11481 Riverview Road NE., Hanover, MN. 55341 Signature --- Date: 09/01/05 Upgr Requirements fderived from Minnesota Statutes§115.55) An ITPHS must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system fails to provide sufficient groundwater protection, then the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by rule or the local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This does not apply to systems in shore/and areas, wel/head protection areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. Suggested Attachments 1) Site sketch which includes the system location (mandatory). Other items could include: well, well setback to system, dwelling or other buildings, tank(s), reserved soil treatment area, surface water and soil boring locations. Include as-built drawing if available. 2) Soil boring logs, showing each horizon. Indicate the texture, color, redoximorphic features depth to bedrock, standing water and whether the material is fill. 3) A list of any and all requirements of the local ordinance that are different from the state requirements referred to on this form. 4) A homeowner survey of system performance, signed by the homeowner as being factual. 5) Monitoring data as appropriate. Page 2 of 2 Logs of Soil Borings License#810 Location or Project: 920 W. Wayzata Blvd. Borings made by: Rusty Olson's Soil and Perc testing 8/31/2005 Classification System: AASHO ; USDS-USDS-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two): Hand_X_, or Power , Flight, Bucket or Probe X_ Boring Number_1_Surface elevation_91.7_ Mottled Soil at 0.9_feet 0"-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H2O present at_X_inches 10"-28" Rusty dark brown loam 10yr3/2 28"-36" Rusty olive brown clay loam 2.5y5/3 34"-42" Rusty brown clay loam 10yr4/3 APPRvx gx‘sn ut, `�. ExuTw� TREA,e 4 c ELL �$ 6s \ \ EuX`lSTIAJ(r ' �'AUS'rt . r t r MAIM V \\'t::: �1, K Re vVA { �� mam To? Dr- LrAol,e 13 13 ELV-/U4.U U Silo- Scale: ' 3e; e Percolation Test Q Soil Boring • 8 Bench Matic Chock all underground utilitic • Properiy of: ,ARftE g5oA) �0 .0 WAY2 6 LVA, oP.. o Nt. ' "fr Date C IQLI�S P11(763)49a-R7; Rusty OIson's sail and percolation testi) -t., Designed by