Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-25-2019 Council Packet
Agenda Council Meeting Monday, November 25, 2019, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. City Council Meeting Minutes of November 12, 2019 2. Claims/Bills 3. Approval of 2020 Liquor Licenses 4. Liquor Violation — Orono Golf Course 5. Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement with Verizon Wireless 6. Accept Resignation & Resolution of Appreciation for Sandy Pettit 7. Non -Waiver of Tort Limits 8. Approval to Dispose of Bicycles Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Public Works/City Engineer Report 9. 2020 Draft Public Works Plan Mayor/Council Report City Administrator Report City Attorney Report Adjournment Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda Council Meeting Monday, November 25, 2019, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Upcoming Events 2019 11-28-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 11-29-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 12-09-19 Truth in Taxation, Monday, 6:30 p.m. 12-09-19 City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 12-24-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 12-25-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 2020 01-01-20 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-06-20 Parks Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. 01-13-20 City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 01-20-20 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-21-20 Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday, 6:30 p.m. 01-27-20 Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 01-27-20 City council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Richard Crosby, III, Matt Johnson, and Aaron Printup. The following members were absent: Victoria Seals. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Finance Director Ron Olson, Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, and City Attorney Soren Mattick. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Veterans were asked to stand and be recognized; the meeting was dedicated to Veterans in honor of Veterans Day. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 28, 2019 2. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 28, 2019 3. CLAIMSBILLS 4. CREDIT CARD CONVENIENCE FEE 5. APPROVAL OF RENTAL LICENSES 6. APPROVAL PROPOSED COUNCIL LIAISON TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS IN 2020 7. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR JACKIE YOUNG RESOLUTION NO. 7040 8. APPROVAL OF RECORDING SERVICE AGREEMENT — TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL FOR MEETING MINUTES 9. APPROVE TO DISPOSE OF CITY PROPERTY — OFFICE FILING CABINETS 10. APPOINT AUDITOR FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019, 2020 AND 2021 11. APPROVAL OF LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT — CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12. 2018 STREETS RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT — PAY REQUEST NO. 5 — FINAL 13. ORONO PRESERVE — FORMAL ACCEPTANCE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS — RESOLUTION NO. 7041 14. APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF FORFEITED VEHICLE 15. LA19-000069 — GORDON JAMES CONSTRUCTION OB/O DALE & JONMARI OLSEN, 3315 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCES & IUP — RESOLUTION NO. 7042 Page 1 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. 16. LA19-000079 — STEPHANIE GRIFFIN OB/O WEEKLEY HOMES, 580 SANDHILL DRIVE, TRAIL VACATION AND REALIGNMENT — RESOLUTION NO. 7043 17. LA19-000081— DAVID & STACEY ROYAL, 3135 JAMESTOWN RD, VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 7044 18. LA19-000082 — ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP OB/O JOHN & CHRISTINE BUBOLTZ, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT RD —RESOLUTION NO. 7045 19. LA19-000083 — JIM CLEARY EVERLAST ENTERPRISES INC., 315 CRESTVIEW AVE, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 7046 Crosby moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Adam Bell, 17615 25th Avenue, Plymouth, Assistant Den Leader, Dens 8 and 9 of Pack 206, stated he brought several Scouts to the meeting to work on their advancement by attending a government meeting and thanked the City Council for their time. Walsh welcomed the group. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 20. LA19-000074 — WILLIAM GRIFFITH OB/O THEODORE BONNETT, 40 AND 45 SMITH AVENUE, REQUEST FOR STREET VACATION Barnhart stated the City received a request to vacate a portion of Smith Avenue and some unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to the Luce Line. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended denial of the request but recommended the applicant provide responses to some of the issues raised in the review. Using a map, he indicated the property location and the right-of-way to be vacated. The applicant proposed an additional easement or right-of-way to build a cul-de-sac at the southern edge of the property. A portion of Smith Avenue and the unimproved rights-of-way would be vacated north of that area. The proposal addresses two issues raised: 1) retaining right-of-way over the sanitary sewer manhole would retain that public interest; 2) improves a circulation issue for motorists in the area because there is no way to turn around at the end of Smith Avenue. Currently people use private driveways to turn around, and Staff is looking for a way to do that outside of private improvements. The proposal shows an additional right-of-way/easement for the City to build a cul-de-sac which is sized according to City Code. If the property is not vacated, a turnaround would likely be created within the existing easement but is not ideal nor consistent with City Code. Barnhart said the Planning Commission also raised the need to connect Smith Avenue and the neighborhood beyond to the Luce Line, a public state trail. Currently people seem to cut through a corner of private property to access the trail, so there is a need to improve that access. The applicant also proposed an easement along the south side of 45 Smith to get from Smith Avenue to Orono Orchard Road. He indicated on a map the path users take to access the trail. He said Staff, in their review of this response, can support the vacation. The barrier the Planning Commission/City Council has to have, is Page 2 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. there a public interest in the property. With the cul-de-sac and with an easement connecting Smith to the road, Staff can't support the vacation of the balance of the right-of-way because it does not serve a huge purpose at this point. The item has raised quite a bit of interest raised in the neighborhood. The Planning Commission recommended denial; Staff, reviewing the response to the Planning Commission comments, can support a vacation request subject to a couple of tweaks as mentioned in the report. Walsh said there are a lot of old street easements in Orono, and the goal is to clean them up and they have done the ones that have made sense. He has met with the applicant and some neighbors and walked the property. The current easements that go to the trail are incredibly steep, which is why people are cutting through the applicant's property, which is a nice, easy trail. He appreciates the applicant in his emails said he would keep the trail open if people wanted to use it. His opinion is there needs to be a turnaround and it needs to meet City Codes and something Staff would support. He does not have a problem with vacating all the different easements but does not think the extra easement to get to Orono Orchard Road is needed. He would like to create a permanent easement where that path is in now in exchange for doing the other stuff. Right now, there is direct access to Luce Line Trail and he does not want to give up direct access, so it would be swapping out some things to make it better for everybody and make it official so it can't ever leave. Crosby asked if any improvements would be made on the easement. Walsh thought, since it would be a permanent easement, the City would be able to make improvements such as gravel because presently it is a trail with big logs all the way there and is pretty worn. He would want to keep that trail by giving up the other stuff to continue to have direct access for neighbors, etc. Printup noted it would be City property to access the trail so it could not be touched. Walsh concurred it would be a City easement and a permanent easement of record on the title. Right now, technically the applicant could close the trail; then the only way through there is to go through buckthorns and it is really steep, not something people would want to go through, which is why he thinks people are not using that path. The City would have to do some major work to improve that path. Crosby stated it would be a City easement, not City property. Walsh said it would be a right that would not go away and so basically City property. He clarified it would be a swap -out to keep the direct access. The other vacations help clean up everything. It gets everything together, a cul-de-sac and a turnaround, and direct access to the Luce Line is kept. Printup commented there would not be future disruption to the neighborhood because once the access is there, it's there. Walsh said he knows there are a lot of people present but wanted to give direction of what his common sense tells him would make the most sense for the neighborhood, because it solves a lot of issues. Johnson asked if the zoning district was a 2 -acre zone. Barnhart answered it was a 2 -acre zone. Johnson asked, with the easement and two parcels, if that would bring the total to six acres. Page 3 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart did not believe it would. Johnson wondered if there would be a real risk of being a redevelopment there. Barnhart did not think so. Walsh offered that it would be two parcels but they would have a little extra width and depth. Johnson asked, that being the case, what the benefit was of having the cul-de-sac in that location versus pushing it farther into the back end of the easement and then having a trail coming off the cul-de-sac. Barnhart stated there was no incentive for the applicant to do that and the City would have to acquire additional land. Johnson stated a hammerhead would be another choice that would fit there. Barnhart agreed a hammerhead would be another choice. Johnson asked whether the cul-de-sac was a City expense. Barnhart said the plan would be to pave this section as part of next year's project, and used the map to indicate the portion that would be paved if the Council grants a vacation. Johnson clarified that the City would also create a cul-de-sac. Barnhart confirmed that a cul-de-sac would be created. Johnson asked if creating a cul-de-sac was an increase of expense as opposed to paving more. Rief responded, square footage -wise, with the development at the end of the hammerhead, it would be pretty much an even wash or even less cost to the City. Crosby asked what the connection would be to the trail. Barnhart stated it would depend on what the Council decided but thought there would be an easement. Walsh said that would be determined, but there needs to be a trail to connect to where the existing log trail is currently. That would have to get plotted out. Johnson said what is being proposed is pretty unreasonable for two reasons: 1) Going over to Orono Orchard, you're going on a busier road; 2) A new property owner, whomever that is, now has a trail going by their house. Walsh agreed and said to get rid of the one being proposed there, it is not needed. Crosby clarified he was talking about the one to the Luce Line. Page 4 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Johnson stated he was bringing a fact to light, that the one that is there is not reasonable. Walsh agreed, stating it is steep going up and down. Rief pointed out if the City decides not to vacate anything or come to an agreement with the easement or the current path that goes across the private property, an option would be to, at the end, go to the right- of - way down the left side, which is a 10-15 foot drop in elevation rather than 20-25 as it is currently. Johnson commented that would bring you onto the DNR land. Rief agreed and pointed out the up -trail on the map, which would bring people to the DNR land. Walsh asked whether anyone from the public would like to comment. Mr. Bill Griffith, representing the applicants, said the issue comes up as a result of concerns about public safety at the end of the road and other places when people discover they have to turn around and there is no place to turn around. In meeting with City officials onsite, given the 2020 project, it made sense to bring forward the opportunity to vacate some of the right-of-way, obtain right-of-way, and maybe resolve some of the issues on a permanent basis. One of the reasons Mr. Bonnett proposed the alignment of the trail at the location is because it creates the most flexibility in the future in terms of the property being potentially subdivided. Mr. Bonnett is willing to look at other options. For example, an option would be to run along Orono Orchard Road within the edge of the property and straight back to the Luce Line. As the Mayor suggested, sometimes the benefit is cleaning up titles and issues that have existed for decades. And the defining is, if there is no public use/benefit of the right-of-way, the City essentially vacates it and it goes back to the adjoining property owners. There is a public benefit to the vacation application because it results in additional right-of-way in exchange to provide the cul-de-sac. The Bonnetts view this as doubling potential access, so they offered to continue the access over his property and also provide this potential permanent right. He and the applicant have not had a chance to discuss the Mayor's suggestion, but Mr. Bonnett will give the Council his perspective as the property owner. The applicant has agreed to the City's conditions, it provides a public benefit, a public safety benefit, and an even exchange in providing the right-of-way. They believe it will be a benefit to the private owner and the City, and they are present to work through the issues. Mr. T.J. Bonnet, 40/45 Smith Avenue, stated he is not here to block anyone from accessing the Luce Line. He thinks if the issue was important to everyone on the block, it would probably have been addressed in the last 20 years. He believes the big concern is all of the turnarounds because of the 6 Smith Restaurant. There are five places of access from the golf course corner to the Palmers' house to the Luce Line, most of which are on private property like his. All the residents are fine with this. If the vacation goes through, there will be six places of access. Initially when this was discussed, the City wanted his land to solve this issue and suggested giving him, in exchange, the end of the street, which is about 23 paces to the end of the pavement. He thinks Almo got thrown in because the Whiteley's said if 45 Smith Avenue is developed, that house could move a little bit away from the property. Whiteley's called and asked their name not to be used, but that is the only reason Bonnett's asked for Almo. He said they do not need the unimproved spot. Mr. Bonnett said there are a number of emotional appeals about the Luce Line access but most are from people who don't live at the end of the Smith cul-de-sac. The safety from the vehicles is the issue, not the path. The former residents of 40 and 45 Smith all support this plan, and he named several people. Several Page 5 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. people offered to write a letter because they feel it is a nightmare living there. Two of the three most affected property owners also support the plan, other than Whiteleys. He mentioned that people at the last meeting stated there was no extra traffic from 6 Smith. He relayed a story about a former resident who was outside when a convertible stopped to ask directions to 6 Smith, hit some potholes that were filled with rainwater from a construction project on Smith, and splashed all the occupants. He said the public safety solution is good for the people; it has nothing to do with the path access. He repeated there are five access points and six after this, which is as many people who do not live on the street who do not support the plan. He encouraged property owners who have path access to approach the City and ask for a permanent easement if they wished to do so. He is more than willing to work with the City. There are eight people who have lived on the street and dealt with the issues who support the plan. The arguments are great but it doesn't hold water when you talk about all the people who have direct access to the Luce Line but they must use his path, a lot of whom do not live in the neighborhood. Mr. Bonnett understands a vacation is common in this type of circumstance, where there is no benefit for the end of that road spur existing. He is giving up land for the cul-de-sac; the City is getting land at the end of the street and does not have to repave that road next year. He believes it is a prudent taxpayer - focused decision. Since 6 Smith has opened, there are 8-10 cars a day going by extremely fast looking at their GPS. They have two small children and he doesn't want to see any accidents happen. They approached the City with the cul-de-sac six years ago; they weren't interested at that point. He wants to get something done on the issue and not kick the can down the road. The issue is, if the path went directly through their property and they want to put a garage there, which is why they're getting more property, so the garage can have water, they want 4.1 acres to get an accessory dwelling unit, they would be hamstrung, or if they would want to move the house on the lot. Mr. Bonnett is reluctant to say, "Let's plow it through direct access" because nobody else in the neighborhood has done it. He understands at the end of the street it touches DNR property and Xcel Energy property and then it goes to the Luce Line. The path has been across private property for 20 years, it's never been an issue, and it's not going to be an issue in the future. He gave names of several people he called or emailed before the meeting to let them know they could use the path. After tonight's meeting they'll be able to use the path no matter what happens. If he builds a barn in the middle of an easement, he would want Luce Line access and would create it at that point across his property for people to use, but running a permanent easement through it clouds the process of solving the issue at the end of the street. He thanked the Council and hopes something can be done tonight. Ms. Stacey Quinn, 125 Smith, said 6 Smith did open and T.J. mentioned a lot of names, but he did not mention her or her husband's names, nor did he speak to them about the potential cul-de-sac. They are not opposed to a cul-de-sac at the end of the street. It is a busy street, and redevelopment/more homes at the end of the street would make it busier. It is a dead-end/short street and T.J. wants to make it shorter. It's a worn path because it's on Smith Avenue. The reason they purchased their home 12 years ago is so they had direct access to the Luce Line which they use quite a bit and have had no issues for several years. The path did cut into a little corner of T.J.'s property; it is very far from the front of his property. They were never asked not to take that path. The path was groomed by the previous homeowner, it used to be very well taken care of, because the neighborhood uses it and will continue to use it. She is opposed to the vacation being granted. She doesn't know what a hammerhead or City easement would look like: how big, how long, how wide. She is very disheartened this is happening in her neighborhood from a neighbor that never approached them, and he cannot get to his home unless he crosses by her home. There is no way 8- 9 people are lost going to 6 Smith. You cannot go 50 miles an hour down the street, especially now, because the street is in complete disrepair. She is requesting a cul-de-sac at the end of the street, access on Page 6 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Smith to the Luce Line at the end of the street, and don't make the street shorter. If there is talk of a City easement, she would like to see what it looks like. Mr. Doug Whiteley, 60 Orono Orchard Road, said he has never seen an issue that caused an uproar like this other than a proposal to put a cell tower on the Orono Public Golf Course. There is an overwhelming negative response to the proposal. He thinks a permanent easement from Smith Avenue to Luce Line is a very viable solution, but putting one on Orono Orchard Road would be a tragic mistake. He walks to Luce Line 5-6 times a week with his dog, noting as you walk south around the curve from Woodhill Avenue, there's a straightaway and the Luce Line bridge going south, there is a blind spot and you cannot see cars going around the curve. It is dangerous; there's no shoulder and it is not safe. The topography of the proposed easement from Smith Avenue to Orono Orchard is very steep and makes no sense. He agrees with the previous speaker that the cul-de-sac should be by the dead end. He is not opposed to the cul-de- sac but is opposed to the Smith to Orono Orchard Road proposal. He never spoke to T.J. about swapping land. Mr. Sean Benson, 1220 Lyman Avenue, opposes the plan proposed by the Bonnetts. He referenced the Planning Staff's comment that they could not support the proposal unless, among other requests, there is "an inclusion of a trail easement from Smith to the Luce Line." He said this plan does not include that but is an easement that goes to Orono Orchard Road which does not make sense and is also a safety issue. He referenced an email from Mr. Bonnett which stated, "We will maintain the path that is currently available to all neighbors as invitees. This hopefully should not affect anyone too much. The permanent easement cannot be run directly through our property at this point in time as the property line will change if the vacation is granted." He said the plan appears to allow no direct access from Smith to the Luce Line. However, Mr. Bonnett is indicating neighbors can use the current trail but at his discretion. He does not feel that is an appropriate solution because a future property owner could decide not to allow trail access. He wanted to know if a resident of Orono, who doesn't live in the neighborhood, would be prevented from accessing the Luce Line from Smith Avenue. He believes it is better for the City Council to make an explicit decision about allowing community -wide access from Smith directly to the Luce Line. Mr. Benson also questioned the fundamental equity of this plan and said there's a lot of talk about cleanup as though it is normal that residents get free land, which he feels sets a dangerous precedent. He understands the City would give up .66 acres of land with the vacation and the Bonnetts would give up .06 acres of land for the cul-de-sac, so the Bonnetts would receive .6 acres of land at no cost. He does not think it is a benefit for any residents to receive City land at no cost. It also sets an inappropriate precedent for residents to request similar vacations in the future. He would propose an alternative plan whereby the City would move the cul-de-sac north to the end of Smith Avenue, and that way it would lead directly to the DNR -owned trail that leads to the Luce Line. In return for the cul-de-sac, the City could allow the Bonnetts to receive a similarly sized piece of land, .06 acres or something that is equitable. If the Bonnetts do not want to trade property, the City could consider putting in a hammerhead turnaround which should not require any exchange of land. The residents would get the turnaround, direct access from Smith to the Luce Line, the Bonnetts don't have to contend with people on their property, the City does not have to contend with any permanent easements while addressing safety concerns, and it is fair. Mr. Matt Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, stated as far as traffic, it's UPS trucks and a few strange cars. The path was supposed to go straight to the Luce Line, not to Orono Orchard. If you walk along the ditch, there are culverts with water and other things. It should go straight at the end and the cul-de-sac should be right where the end of the road is now, or a hammerhead. A turnaround is not needed. People back in the driveways. Repave the road and make the road decent because it is a pretty rough road. He does not see Page 7 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. people speeding. It's the end of the road; people are slowing down. When people back into your driveway it can get frustrating at times but that's what happens when the road is narrow. He thinks a hammerhead would work; a cul-de-sac is not needed. Mr. Merritt Jackley, 80 Smith Avenue, knows there was an issue when people put 6 Smith in Google Maps, that people went to their location; but they have worked with Google Maps and it should now have people going to the restaurant. T.J. gave him verbal approval to use the path for friends and family which he appreciates, but he feels it's in the community's best interests to make it a permanent easement. He agreed with Mayor Walsh's proposal and plan but suggested the plan be put into writing so the citizens can see it and vote and decide from there. Mr. Ash Stoesz, 1170 Lyman Avenue, does not want to stop anyone specifically but referenced the Alamo place and asked, before anything is vacated, the City explore whether that is something that is viable in that if a tree falls over at the end of Smith Avenue, everyone is landlocked in, and to the extent there's an opportunity to evaluate a second point of exit, it would be interesting to think about. Ms. Pam Cariveau, 60 Smith Avenue, does not feel the plan submitted meets the Planning Commission's recommendations, citing lack of an equitable access to Luce Line Trail. The newly proposed easement does not provide access to Luce Line Trail; it provides access to Orono Orchard Road. She feels routing the easement down a steep embankment and onto Orono Orchard is not safe or equitable in comparison to a direct -access path at the end of Smith. Ms. Cariveau noted the City -owned land at the end of Smith Avenue is the nearest and only non -private property access point to the trail in the neighborhood. The next nearest public access point is on Orono Orchard Road, which is not the safest access point. Currently the trail at the end of Smith Avenue has been routed through private property with Private Property signs. There is much public interest in retaining City -owned land at the end of Smith Avenue so everyone can enjoy safe and unfettered access to the Luce Line Trail via City- and DNR -owned land without the need for an easement. Ms. Cariveau stated the DNR has given permission for a simple footpath or a more formal path should the City decide to coordinate with the DNR. The DNR is working to remove trails that cut through private property. Future access points will only be allowed through City and DNR land according to a letter from the DNR. If the City decides a cul-de-sac is inevitable, she suggested an equitable exchange of land with the Bonnetts might be to give them the City land that runs parallels to the Luce Line Trail while maintaining the original length of Smith and the City -owned land to access the trail via DNR land. Ms. Cariveau noted the Bonnett's are asking for 28,750 square feet of land when only 2,600 square feet of land is needed to effectively make a cul-de-sac. If the City vacates the land parallel to the Luce Line Trail, both sides, the Bonnetts will still receive more land in exchange than what is required for a cul-de-sac, which she stated was reasonable. Ms. Alisa Benson, 1220 Lyman, said their family has taken up the sport of geocaching, which is not permitted on private land, the caches must be placed on City or DNR land, so this type of cleaning up prevents that activity. Mr. David Klema, 40 Orono Orchard, stated T.J. has less than 3 acres and the vacation would total .6 acres but referenced Mr. Bonnett's comment about building an accessory dwelling unit that required 4.1 acres and asked how the math comes out if he is under 3 and the total vacation is .6. Walsh stated that would not be part of the decision-making process either way. Page 8 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mr. Klema asked whether the smaller lot could be resized so Mr. Bonnett could take acreage from that to make his other lot bigger, in theory, he could subdivide that lot. Walsh stated these are 2 -acre minimums so there would only be two lots there no matter what. Mr. Klema wasn't sure whether the small lot could be made smaller because it is already less than 2 acres. Walsh stated you cannot subdivide something unless it meets the zoning requirement. Mr. Klema asked how you would be able to have an accessory dwelling unit, if it was possible. Printup stated he had no idea. Ms. Angie Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, believes the vacation of the property is not to the benefit of everyone in the neighborhood and City of Orono. If a cul-de-sac is needed, it should be at the north end of Smith and allow the City property to be the direct access to the Luce Line. She referenced an email T.J. sent which stated he gives access through his property to his discretion and everybody has access with the exception of one person. She asked how in the future they would know they still have access through the property and said T.J. should not have the discretion to cut people off if there is a permanent access. She asked, if the cul-de-sac goes in where it is now and there is a permanent easement, does that go from the Smith Avenue cul-de-sac all the way through to the Luce Line. Walsh stated it would. Ms. Hopping asked who would patrol that to make sure everyone still had access if there are Private Property signs set up, how would you get access. Walsh stated there could not be Private Property signs up if it was an easement. Ms. Hopping said the current access is not very inviting because of the Private Property signs. Mr. Bonnett says he gives access, but it's to his discretion, which she does not believe is fair. She also does not believe it would be fair to give that much property in return for the small amount of the cul-de-sac. Mr. T.J. Bonnett, 40/45 Smith Avenue, felt if there were a hammerhead at the end, people would continue using driveways and a cul-de-sac is more desirable. Regarding the path, his intention would be to rip up the end of Smith, beautify it, make it better, get rid of hard space, put some green space in, and landscape it. He would eventually like to build a garage somewhere, but it's probably five years from now so he can't really say what the plan is. Early on they talked about could it be three lots, what developments are going to go on there, is it going to be a bunch of condos, an office building. That is not his intention, and he feels he has communicated that. The neighbor that is not allowed to access the path destroyed his property, there was a lawsuit, the judge sided with Mr. Bonnett, and he thinks any reasonable person would not allow that person to cross the property. That's the only exception for people using the path. Mr. Robert Miller, 60 Smith Avenue, stated he is the excluded neighbor, which he is fine with. The plan as proposed does not meet the requirements put forward by the Planning Commission as well as City Staff. He is not opposed to a cul-de-sac; he feels it should be at the end of the street. He is not entirely opposed to vacating some property to the Bonnetts to allow for the cul-de-sac. Mr. Bonnett is giving up some land so he should get something out of it. He thinks it would be more appropriate to take land Page 9 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. parallel to the Luce Line than shortening the street and eliminating the direct access to Luce Line Trail and the DNR property. Mayor Walsh closed the public comment section at 6:52 p.m. Printup thought this winter neighbors might get together and make sure there's some sort of footpath on public property so private property is not touched, nor should it be. The cul-de-sac would be nice and convenient in timing because of the upcoming road project. He said the City could also repave it and leave things as -is and then designate the path going to the Luce Line on City property and there is no private property affected. He would deny the proposal as presented until a plan is brought up to grant the public access to the Luce Line Trail. From a bureaucratic standpoint it sounds kind of small because it should be about vacations and roadways and road improvements, but he is okay with not having a hammerhead or cul-de-sac and leaving the road the way it is after it gets paved. His two takes are to either leave it alone and dedicate a path, or do some sort of improvement but have a dedicated path. Walsh stated the goal for the City is to do the best long-term solution which, in the end, is a cul-de-sac because it's the best way to turn around, although where the cul-de-sac goes is up for debate. The City has direct access and he did not feel the City would give that up. He also would not approve the plan as presented. An option would be to ask the applicant if they would like to table it and come back with a plan based on comments they've heard, and then everyone could see it on paper and then stake it out. The trail through the Bonnetts' land is a very calm, easygoing trail. It would not be the best solution to go through City land because it is so steep, but it could be done. Not everybody is going to be happy. If the City is going to clean things up, they want to come up with the best solution for the citizens long-term. Crosby said it makes sense to have the cul-de-sac at the end of the road and some type of connection from the end of the cul-de-sac to the trail leading to Luce Line. If the Bonnett property's elevation is better for the path, a swap may be a good idea to make it more accessible. He is not in favor of the proposed plan. He agrees a cul-de-sac is going to be needed, but the question is placement. There is a better place, which is down the road. There should be an equitable land swap to make things better for everybody. The neighbors should work together and the applicant should come up with a better proposal from what he is hearing. It can be a win-win for everybody safety -wise and a permanent access to the trail for everyone. He is not an advocate of the trail going to Orono Orchard. Johnson agreed with the previous comments. It would make sense to him to move the cul-de-sac to the end of the street, which removes any question about people's continued rights to gain access to the trail. Historically, the City has done a good job keeping people's access to parks and trails. There may be an opportunity to vacate some of that once the cul-de-sac is in the right spot. The City needs the property owner's cooperation to put a cul-de-sac there, and there has to be something in it for the property owner. There needs to be a good, usable road; and the City will find a way to continue the access people have come to enjoy. The safety side of it is important as far as emergency vehicles. If it was a new development, a cul-de-sac would be put in. It is also reasonable for citizens to see the final plan before it gets approved, so it needs to be brought before the Council. He noted he does not know if putting the cul- de-sac there would create nonconformity with the required setbacks from the houses. Walsh asked if the applicant would like the Council to vote on the plan as proposed or if he would like it tabled and go back to the drawing board a little bit. Page 10 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Mr. Bonnett said he would like to know where the path has to be because eventually, they would like to build on some flat ground. He reiterated that he has to get something if he is giving something. Walsh stated the City would like the best path, easy walking. The path that is there now is very walkable. He suggested working with Staff, and if there were a better route that makes sense that can be put in without a lot of difficulty, that would be fine. If the City were to do an entire huge grading project, the City might as well put in the hammerhead and deal with what the City has. Mr. Bonnett said putting in the hammerhead would be expensive, paving the end of the land would be expensive, and grading the path to put a path in would be a lot of money. Walsh commented the existing path is really good. Everything else, once you get to the hill, is steep. At the end of the street, if you go left, it's a non -working solution. Mr. Bonnett, using a map, suggested a route which would curve down into the path and thought the confusion might be over the wording of "direct" or "indirect." Crosby asked why the City wouldn't just be able to move the cul-de-sac to the end of the road. Mr. Bonnett responded with why would you just want to drive farther for the fun of it. He added that also does not get him what he wants, which means the City will not get the cul-de-sac that everybody would want. He stated he wants to work with the City. Mr. Bonnett asked where the City wanted the cul-de-sac to move. Crosby said down to the end. Mr. Bonnett asked if he should amend that part of the plan and pointed to the map. Walsh stated the applicant and Staff needs to figure out what makes the most sense, but the existing pathway is the best pathway. Mr. Bonnett commented that the Engineer said that's where it should go because that's where the manhole cover is, which the City wants access to with their big trucks. Walsh reiterated the applicant should work with Staff because he is not here to plan the road, that's what Jeremy and Adam do, and if they can bring back a recommendation knowing what's been said tonight as to the most logical and best place, and then the applicant can talk to them about the pathway. Mr. Bonnett said he is in favor of that and he understands that and the easements. He said if everything has to be voted on and waited out, with all due respect to Mr. Johnson, he would be back after the road gets repaved, which is what he wants to avoid. Mr. Bonnett indicated he just heard about the easement today or yesterday. Barnhart indicated he thought it was Friday. Mr. Bonnett said he is trying to get it as complete as he can and appease everybody. Page 11 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh noted it's a process starting with the Planning Commission, neighbors have reached out, Council members have talked about it and have been to the site and the City Council is trying to make sure the right thing is done for the long-term, not just whether the neighbors like it or not. Mr. Bonnett agreed with Walsh. Walsh stated the City needs cooperation from Bonnett and if he is willing to take direction from Staff and figure out the best spot and then the pathway from there, it could be tabled. He could meet with them and then come back with a new plan for everybody to look at again. Crosby agreed that would be the way to go. Mr. Bonnett agreed to table the matter. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to table the matter. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. RECESS AND RECONVENE The meeting recessed at 7:04 p.m. and reconvened at 7:10 p.m. 21. LA19-000078 — LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, 3245 WAYZATA BLVD W, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Barnhart presented a Sketch Plan Review for a proposed development on Wayzata Boulevard. He stated in 2016-2017 Eisinger Meadows was reviewed by the City Council, a 27 -unit townhome type of development on the subject property. Last fall the Council reviewed a sketch plan for a large condominium in the area that was previously a landfill. During the development of the larger attached family dwelling unit last year, the applicant discovered the costs associated with that development were higher than expected and is looking at other options. One of the options is, instead of doing the Eisinger Meadows townhome-type development, to do some higher density along Wayzata Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan that was just completed guided this area for 3-10 units an acre, consistent with the Eisinger Meadows project, but not consistent with a development of this scale. Barnhart asked if the Council has any appetite to add higher density to the northern portion of the Eisinger property and likely a use similar to a detached family apartment or condominium building. During review Staff did not spend a lot of time on site development or architecture of the building, partly because the same comments that were generated at that time still hold true. If Council wants anything specific changed, Council should let Staff know. The Planning Commission reviewed this last month and generally supported the adding of density, noting it's probably the best location for density because it is far away from any other residential use and surrounded by Wayzata Boulevard to the north and Highway 12 to the south. He stated the applicants are present. There are two questions: 1) If the Council is interested in adding density there; 2) Whether there is or isn't, are there any changes the Council would like to make to the rest of the property. Johnson asked what the proposed density per acre was. Page 12 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart said currently it is guided for 3-10 units per acre and it was developed at about 5. In the development shown, the guiding range is 20-25 units an acre and comes in at about 22-23 units an acre. Crosby asked whether the guiding was 5. Walsh stated 5 was the amount approved previously. Walsh asked if the applicant had anything to add. Mr. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, said his company is wrestling with the cleanup portion of what was approved for the high-density component, recognizing that the cleanup on the north portion on the phase being presented is going to be more economical to clean up. They thought it would get their feet wet to find out what there really is for cleanup because there will be some cleanup on the western edge of that proposed building. He is looking for feedback if the Council can support the density change or not. Walsh asked if there was anybody who wanted to talk about the item. Mr. Tony Sarenpa, local resident, stated he is in favor of the higher density proposal, stating why not do a little more if it is already higher density, that it makes sense. Crosby asked why he would be in favor of it. Mr. Sarenpa stated if it is right next door to it, it seems to make sense, rather than break it up. Crosby commented that it is basically replacing what he was proposing earlier. Mr. Sarenpa clarified whether he meant with detached homes. Walsh stated the density where the landfill site is, he is moving it over there. Mr. Sarenpa reiterated that it made sense to him. Barnhart, using a map, stated the applicant is proposing to keep the 20-25 units the same and then indicated the area where the applicant would like to add higher density. Ms. Stacey Royal, 3135 Jamestown Road, said she was against the 244 units; she thought it was a little too much for the area. Now 127 units is being proposed for this, and she thinks that is still a lot. There is not a complex that size in this area. She commented the resident that was talking with the developers beforehand maybe has more information about the development. The townhomes increase it already to 27 units, which could be 3-4 people per unit so that already increases the numbers. She does not think a high- density apartment complex is great for the area, based on the facts there are schools there, the driveway would be right by the main school driveway that's used to get into the activity center, and there are already traffic issues on old Highway 12 and Highway 6 during school hours. She understands density has to be done someplace but does not know if it is the best place because it is by the schools. Walsh noted the Council went through a lot of thoughtful discussion on how to zone and guide the area and feels the density along that corridor was a very nice development and it was kind of an afterthought when the Council said, Where the dump site is, if you can figure that out, you can put some extra density Page 13 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. there. He feels what Curt came up with the townhome development was spot-on, and he obviously has flexibility to do something in the back. A big complex will change the look of the whole area. From a long-term perspective, he thinks it will be a much more viable project. From an aesthetics point of view, that is what it's already guided for and what Curt has brought to the table. The Council actually brought that to the table to say that was a possibility, because it was not guided because it was back in the trees and you wouldn't see it and it seemed like a pretty good place to be able to put it. Printup is okay with how the Council has guided the density. Johnson commented that is what he was going to say before, that the Council has their equation regarding the City's density and he would not be in support of increasing it beyond what is slated. Crosby stated he is also not in favor of increasing density because he would be concerned it would be taxing on the schools and he is comfortable with the original guiding. Walsh said they did a great project. He suggested parceling it off into two different parcels so there's a separate investment parcel. Mr. Fretham stated, for clarity, he heard some different things but he thought he heard that the Council would prefer not to change the density that they've already approved. Walsh confirmed he was right. Mr. Fretham asked if the Council had any objection if the guidance was kept on the overall parcel but changed the layout so there might be low density or medium density on the other side of the parcel, whether there was any insight or flexibility on that. Walsh indicated there was thoughtful discussions of what they wanted to see along the corridor, which is why that guidance is in place along Old Highway 12 and the old dump site. There have been thoughtful and long-term discussions with Staff to get to that point, so they would not be looking to change those for any particular reason. He did not believe he saw any appetite from anyone else on the Council to change anything, either. Crosby said he liked the proposal the Council originally looked at. Johnson stated he was nodding his head in agreement also. Walsh asked the applicant what other guidance could be given to him. Mr. Fretham indicated he was stumped because he does not have a viable plan for how to develop it. The infrastructure for getting the 27 villas is too demanding to break it down into one. Bringing that mainline out is a big deal, which is why he thought to switch to the high density. The cleanup, without some kind of assistance, is a hurdle they have not been able to figure out how to do. He's got approvals on guide plan changes and a plan that looks great, but from an economic standpoint he cannot figure out how to make it work, which is why he's trying to come up with an alternative. After visiting on the topic of TIF, he understands that is not appealing from the City's perspective. Page 14 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh commented financial issues don't come into play for making decisions from the City's standpoint. If Staff has logical reasoning to support something in particular, knowing where the Council is coming from and what the City is trying to accomplish, and they come back with something that says, We can support this and this is why we support it, then the Council has more of a thought process of what could be there. Right now, there is nothing that tells the City they need to do anything different because it's been thought through pretty well. If Staff brings something to the Council that says this would work in the overall framework of what the Council wants to accomplish for the community, the Council would probably listen and understand how it works and then have a discussion if it made sense or not. Mr. Fretham stated he appreciated that and that he did talk at the Staff level but they wanted to hear what the Council had to say. Johnson stated that is the direction given to Staff, that they don't necessarily spend a bunch of time going down a rabbit hole for something having no possibility of getting approved by the Council. What is needed is something that gets within the parameters the City has, and then Staff can spend more time on it. If it is something that is outside of the parameters and the answer is consistent from the Council, we don't want Staff spending time going in that direction. Walsh said it's not unlike the item that was just in front of the Council. Staff was given pretty good direction to meet with the applicant to say, because we know where the Council is coming from, here's where we think it should go, and they kind of know where the support comes from and what they can do. So then they don't bring something to the Council and it's, `Well, where did that come fromT The Council is always open to something, but it has to be worked out and thoughtful and then presented. It doesn't mean the Council will agree to anything, but that is the process. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Johnson reiterated Happy Veterans Day to everyone. He has a son in the Army and his dad was a Veteran. Johnson commented Tanager Lake is frozen over. Crosby asked that people not walk on it, that there be no testing. Walsh reminded everyone that ice is never safe. Johnson stated that is what the Sheriff puts on the signs. Crosby added that it is true. Crosby thanked our Veterans for the privilege of freedom they have given all of us. It's not politicians; it's the Vets that keep us safe and keep us free. Walsh echoed the same sentiment to all the Vets. He said Happy Thanksgiving to everybody. He noted he will not be at the next meeting; it will run into vacation schedules. Mr. Printup will be taking over the Mayoral responsibilities. Johnson indicated he missed Walsh saying, "That's 4-0, Jackie." Page 15 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh replied that he missed Jackie, was very sad to see Jackie go, and that we don't have Jackie anymore. We have someone who will just do it offline and nobody will be here. Crosby mentioned it is not the same. Printup stated that means everything will be word for word and brevity is key. Walsh agreed that brevity is key. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT 22. APPROVAL OF OFFICIAL 2020 CALENDAR Rief stated they were presenting the annual calendar for 2020. There are two options being brought forward: One, to leave the normal meeting times; another one, to potentially move meeting times up to 6:00 p.m. and then have a work session for Council before every meeting at 5:00 p.m. Walsh asked if that would move the Planning Commission also to 6:00 p.m. Rief confirmed that and said that also applied to the Park Commission. Crosby asked if the work session would be before every meeting. Walsh confirmed it would be at 5:00 p.m. at every meeting. Instead of two hours at the end of every month, it would be one hour each time. There may be times where a work session isn't needed but one would be planned at 5:00 p.m. every time, allowing everybody to get home a little better. Staff sits around a lot because they are waiting for the meeting at 7:00 p.m., so this would be trying to make things as efficient as possible in government. If it doesn't work, it can be changed. He thought it was worth giving it a shot. Printup clarified that "sitting around" means working up until the meeting. Walsh agreed with Printup's clarification. Crosby asked if the proposal would be to set it that way for the whole year. Walsh answered yes and said that could always be changed. Crosby proposed a trial run of six months. Walsh noted an initial calendar has to be put out. Crosby asked if the calendar could be changed midyear. Walsh answered that it could be changed any time the Council wanted to. Crosby agreed that it would be fine. Page 16 of 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2019 6:00 o'clock p.m. Barnhart suggested moving the Planning Commission Workshop to another night, stating currently it is Wednesdays, which is often a conflict with religion for some of the members. He added he would like to talk with Dustin about that before it is finalized. Walsh stated the motion would be that meeting to be determined when it comes for signature at the next meeting. Barnhart confirmed his statement as correct. Printup moved, Johnson seconded, to approve Option B for the next year's calendar contingent on finding out what day works for the Planning Commission workshops. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Mattick stated there was no attorney update. He thanked the Council for Item 11, stating he enjoyed working with the City Council and hopes to work with them for some time to come. ADJOURNMENT Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 7:32 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 17 of 17 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 2 Item Description: Claims/Bills Date: November 25, 2019 Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 112893 to 112972, totaling $379,596.92. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #112896 American Environmental $39,898.00 Payment for the 2019 sewer televising project. #112957 Schneider Excavating & Grading $5,114.88 Final payment for Old Long Lake Road Ravine Stabilization. #112965 The Gillespie Center $9,500.00 Payment for 2019 annual grant for services provided to Orono residents. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Prepared By:./ MP—'U Reviewed By: 5bV Approved By: -19 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Department Invoice Amount .01 00 Police Department 783.84 783.84 Public Works Department 70.00 70.00 10,885.00 Sewer Police Department 298.00 Police Department 186.90 484.90 300.00 300.00 Special Services Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Special Services 57.00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/14/2019 1 TEST 101-19999 Test Check Image CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/14/2019 1 TEST 101-19999 Test Check Image Total 1: A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 11/25/2019 112893 21742 101-42110-401 Repair PD Hall Light, Battery Packs Total 112893: ADAM EDWARDS 11/25/2019 112894 111419 101-43000-437 CE Course - Pavement Registration Total 112894: All Traffic Solutions 11/25/2019 112895 SO -020150 406-48720-580 2019 ATS -5 Trailer Total 112895: American Environmental LLC 11/25/2019 112896 1566 602-49450-406 2019 CCTV Inspection of Sewer 19-016 Total 112896: Aspen Mills 11/25/2019 112897 246745 101-42110-226 Uniform Patch Aspen Mills 11/25/2019 112897 246970 101-42110-226 Boots Total 112897: Assistant Hennepin County Attorn 11/25/2019 112898 111419-1 231-35610 Vehicle Forfeiture Case #19-008211 Total 112898: BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241696 101-43280-304 LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241699 101-43280-304 Southways Development 18-3999 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241700 101-43280-304 LA18-000036 2635 Kelly Parkway BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241702 101-43280-304 16-3858 Crystal Bay Estates BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241704 101-43280-304 15-3739 Mooney Lake Preserve BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241706 101-43280-304 LA18-000062 387 Orono Orchard Rd BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241707 101-43280-304 16-3868 Shadywood Villas BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241708 101-43280-304 LA18-000072 2709 Walters Port Lane BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241710 101-43280-304 Lakeview Addition 15-3723 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241711 101-43280-304 16-3867 Tanager Estates Department Invoice Amount .01 00 Police Department 783.84 783.84 Public Works Department 70.00 70.00 10,885.00 Sewer Police Department 298.00 Police Department 186.90 484.90 300.00 300.00 Special Services 869.00 Special Services 523.00 Special Services 344.00 Special Services 403.00 Special Services 86.00 Special Services 57.00 Special Services 638.00 Special Services 951.00 Special Services 660.00 Special Services 467.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241712 101-43280-304 LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary Special Services 236.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241713 651-16500 2019 Drainage Improvements 19-029 101-41600-307 1,385.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 651-49910-305 GIS/Mapping Storm Water 690.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 101-43280-304 Orono Preserves Special Services 135.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 101-43170-305 GIS Updates Engineering 1,970.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 601-49400-305 GIS/Mapping Water 990.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 601-49400-305 Mapping Meter Water 605.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 602-49450-305 GIS Updates Sewer 440.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241715 225-45200-304 Big Island Master Plan 19-033 Police Department 890.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241719 651-49910-304 SWPP Storm Water 945.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241719 101-43170-304 General Engineering Engineering 459.50 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241719 435-48972-304 Bracketts Point Mill & Overlay 19-046 0201 G-89 1,121.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241721 602-16500 2019 Sewer Improvements 19-013 112900 7,475.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241723 435-48972-304 2019 Street Improvements 19-001 11/25/2019 13,959.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241725 435-48973-304 2020 Streets Improvements 20-001 2020 Street Improvments 48,156.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241727 225-45200-304 Bederwood Park Improvement 19-032 CAMPBELL 11,787.50 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241731 225-45200-530 Big Island Improvement Phase 1 425.00 18,380.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241734 602-16500 CR 15 & 19 Reconstruct 19-021 2,006.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241734 601-16500 CR 15 & 19 Reconstruct 19-021 2,006.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241755 225-45200-304 East Long Lake Rd Concept Dev 20-031 5,309.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241757 402-48055-304 OCB Project 18-021 OCB Road Reconstruction 441.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/25/2019 112899 0241758 101-43280-304 Orono Preserves Special Services 749.00 Total 112899: 125,133.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 W Lafayette Rd Matter Law/Legal Services 116.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 Data Practices Law/Legal Services 402.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 General Legal/Review 10/19 Law/Legal Services 1,107.73 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 Franchise Agreement Law/Legal Services 294.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 651-49910-307 Drainage Issues Storm Water 186.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 Collocation Agreement Law/Legal Services 434.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 OOOOG-167 101-41600-307 Variance Litigation Law/Legal Services 899.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0004G-155 101-42110-307 Police Matters 10/19 Police Department 310.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0115G-110 101-41600-308 Code Enforcement/Ord Violation 10/19 Law/Legal Services 465.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0150G-100 101-43290-800 Contempt Matter 10/19 Special Projects -Contingencies 1,209.10 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0201 G-89 101-41600-307 Misc Recordings 10/19 Law/Legal Services 505.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0558G-5 101-43280-307 LA18-000038 1400 Bracketts Point Rd Special Services 50.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0637G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000067 3129 Casco Circle Special Services 500.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0638G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000069 3315 Crystal Bay Rd Special Services 200.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/25/2019 112900 0639G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000085 780 Lakeview Parkway Special Services 425.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Payee CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON CAMPBELLKNUTSON Total 112900 CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE CARDMEMBER SERVICE Total 112901: CARGILL SALT Total 112902: CARTEGRAPH Total 112903: CECE S SIGNS Total 112904: Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount 11/25/2019 112900 0640G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000068 580 Orchard Park Rd Special Services 75.00 11/25/2019 112900 0641G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000071 2090 Shoreline Dr Special Services 75.00 11/25/2019 112900 0642G-1 101-43280-307 LA19-000072 4265 Forest Lake Dr Special Services 75.00 11/25/2019 112900 0800G-50 101-42400-307 Staff Meeting 10/19 Building & Zoning 387.50 11/25/2019 112900 0801G-50 101-41600-307 Council Meeting 10/19 Law/Legal Services 620.00 11/25/2019 112900 0802G-50 101-42400-307 B&Z Assistance 10/19 Building & Zoning 1,069.50 11/25/2019 112900 0803G-41 101-41600-307 Ordinances 10/19 Law/Legal Services 108.50 A CAA 77 11/25/2019 112901 041119-1 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Special Projects -Contingencies 193.53 11/25/2019 112901 110619 101-45210-437 Annual Golf Course Staff Development Event Golf Course 160.05 11/25/2019 112901 110719-1 710-49970-221 Hot Spot Replacement Battery - PW 39.76 11/25/2019 112901 111219 701-49800-222 Grease Fittings for Onspot Chains 11.82 11/25/2019 112901 111219-1 602-49450-406 ROW Permit for Shoreline Dr work Sewer 330.00 11/25/2019 112901 111319 101-42110-437 PLEAA Fall Training - H. Gehlen Police Department 40.00 11/25/2019 112901 111619 101-42110-402 Carwash for Squad #261 Police Department 13.00 11/25/2019 112901 111819 101-41900-223 Urinal Screens Central Services 41.95 11/25/2019 112901 111819-1 101-42110-322 Search Warrant Submission Police Department 11.26 11/25/2019 112901 111819-2 101-43000-437 Seminar on Pavement Public Works Department 70.00 11/25/2019 112901 111919 101-42110-240 Business Associates Xmas Cards Police Department 251.03 11/25/2019 112901 111919-1 101-42110-201 DVDs for Video Evidence Police Department 53.54 1,215.94 11/25/2019 112902 2905070535 101-43000-224 Treated Road Salt Public Works Department 11,647.01 11,647.01 11/25/2019 112903 BD0000668 710-49970-416 2020 License -Asset Management Software 5,733.60 5,733.60 11/25/2019 112904 8214 701-49800-403 Unit#460 Reflective 80.00 Century Link 11/25/2019 112905 110419 601-49400-321 Water Plant Phone/Internet 11/4-12/3/19 Water 138.04 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 112905: Centuryl-ink 11/25/2019 112906 1480094524 614-49840-329 Internet 10/8/19-11/7/19 Total 112906: CHARLIE'S AUTO BODY 11/25/2019 112907 111219 703-49960-379 Police Squad #246 Claim #CA92404 Total 112907: CINTAS CORPORATION 11/25/2019 112908 4034620726 101-43000-226 Uniform CINTAS CORPORATION 11/25/2019 112908 4034620726 101-43000-221 Shop Towels CINTAS CORPORATION 11/25/2019 112908 4034620726 101-43000-404 Mat Service - PW CINTAS CORPORATION 11/25/2019 112908 4035210345 101-43000-226 Uniform CINTAS CORPORATION 11/25/2019 112908 4035210345 101-43000-221 Shop Towels Total 112908: CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-439 Bottled Water CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-489 Alcohol Compliance CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-489 Tobacco Compliance CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-401 Repair coffee machine CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-331 Parking Reimbursement CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-41300-489 Condolence Card CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 11/25/2019 112909 111919 101-42110-322 Postage Total 112909: CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATIN 11/25/2019 112910 102614219 101-45210-404 Clubhouse Boiler Repair Total 112910: COROMED 11/25/2019 112911 PS-INV11133 101-42110-580 Cardiac Science AED Total 112911: CORREY FARNIOK 11/25/2019 112912 111119 101-42110-226 Reimb Clothing Department Cable Franchise Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Administration Police Department Golf Course Police Department Police Department Page: 4 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Invoice 138.04 1,059.23 1,059.23 2,594.61 2,594.61 2.63 14.40 59.54 2.63 55.30 8.47 4.49 7.00 1,095.00 198.69 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Page: 5 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 144.83 Water 276.00 276.00 11.92 Total 112912: 11.92 Police Department 647.73 647.73 DITTER INC. 11/25/2019 112913 12150 101-42110-404 Furnace Repair & Maintenance Total 112913: 4,500.00 5,800.67 Police Department 9.67 DOG WASTE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112914 307757 101-45200-223 Dog Waste Roll Bags-Lurton Total 112914: DPC INDUSTRIES 11/25/2019 112915 827001525-1 601-49400-216 Chlorine Total 112915: ECM PUBLISHERS INC 11/25/2019 112916 739921 231-45650-340 2000 GMC Yukon Denali Ad Total 112916: EDDIES AUTO AND MARINE 11/25/2019 112917 47466 101-42110-402 Squads Repairs Total 112917: Emergency Medical Products Inc 11/25/2019 112918 2115749 101-42110-240 Squad Medical Supplies Total 112918: FILEONQ INC 11/25/2019 112919 7956 101-42110-311 Software Support 2020 FILEONQ INC 11/25/2019 112919 7976 710-49970-575 Software Upgrade Total 112919: FRED VARGAS 11/25/2019 112920 111419 101-42110-437 Reimb Meals - 1st Responder Training Total 112920: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 11/25/2019 112921 3270-458512 701-49800-240 Electrical Terminal GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 11/25/2019 112921 3270-459039 701-49800-222 Shop Supplies & Chipper Box GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 11/25/2019 112921 3270-459181 701-49800-222 Fuses for Unit #428 and Shop supplies GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 11/25/2019 112921 426450 101-42110-402 Credit for Squad Supplies Page: 5 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Department Invoice Amount 198.69 Police Department 2,843.37 2,843.37 Parks 144.83 144.83 Water 276.00 276.00 11.92 11.92 Police Department 647.73 647.73 Police Department 101.69 101.69 Police Department 1,300.67 4,500.00 5,800.67 Police Department 9.67 9.67 3U.1 b 15.87 Police Department 52.70- City of Orono 11/25/2019 112925 9345808688 701-49800-240 Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT GRAINGER INC 11/25/2019 112925 9348972341 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Wrench Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 112925 9353341416 101-43000-224 Hook for Chain Public Works Department Total 112921: Girk, Christopher & Cari 11/25/2019 112922 112019 101-22205 Escrow Refund Z19-000020 2011 Sugarwood Dr. Total 112922: GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 A68468 701-49800-221 Winterize Pontoon Unit#619 Task#33247 GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 8538015 101-43000-224 Sign Supplies GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 8538503 701-49800-222 Unit #470 Repair GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 B538503653 101-45200-221 Pontoon Life Jacket GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 B538757 234-45680-224 Lurton Tree Signs GOPHERACE 11/25/2019 112923 B543678 601-49400-405 Irrigation Line Hydrant Dig Total 112923: GPS INTERNATIONAL TECHNO 11/25/2019 112924 23957 710-49970-416 TrackFusion Annual Fee Total 112924: Department Public Works Department Parks Water GRAINGER INC 11/25/2019 112925 9345808688 701-49800-240 On Spot Chains GRAINGER INC 11/25/2019 112925 9348972341 701-49800-240 Wrench GRAINGER INC 11/25/2019 112925 9350544327 101-43000-224 ForChain & Hook - Concrete Blocks Storage Bins fo Public Works Department GRAINGER INC 11/25/2019 112925 9353341416 101-43000-224 Hook for Chain Public Works Department Total 112925 HEALTH PARTNERS 11/25/2019 112926 93592510 101-21706 Health Insurance 12/2019 HEALTH PARTNERS 11/25/2019 112926 93592510 101-15998 Health Insurance 12/2019 HEALTH PARTNERS 11/25/2019 112926 93592510 101-42110-135 Health Insurance 12/2019 Police Department Total 112926: HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY 11/25/2019 112927 111419 231-35610 Vehicle Forfeiture Case #19-004341 Total 112927: HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 11/25/2019 112928 1000138916 101-42110-414 PD Radio Communication -10/19 Police Department HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 11/25/2019 112928 1000138939 101-43000-414 PW Radios 10/19 Public Works Department Page: 6 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Invoice A-- .00 -- .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 14.88 2.59 11.99 one an 240.00 240.00 13.93 15.16 210.49 42.79 282.37 46,108.00 3,660.00 654.50 50,422.50 9,480.00 9,480.00 2,150.41 195.57 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 112928: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 11/25/2019 112929 1000139135 101-41600-309 Jail Charges-Oct/2019 Law/Legal Services Total 112929: JAMI WITTKE 11/25/2019 112930 111419 101-42110-437 Reimb Meals for Training Police Department Total 112930: JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PR 11/25/2019 112931 21298547 101-42110-404 Annual Fire Alarm Monitoring & Sprinkler Test Police Department Total 112931: LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DI 11/25/2019 112932 110119 101-45200-441 2020 Big Island Dock App Parks Total 112932: LAKESCAPE LLC 11/25/2019 112933 476 101-45200-404 Beach weed removal Parks Total 112933: MAILFINANCE 11/25/2019 112934 N8016284 101-41900-401 Postage Meter Lease 12/16/19-3/15/20 Central Services Total 112934: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/25/2019 112935 21538008 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel Police Department MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/25/2019 112935 21538009 701-49800-212 Diesel Fuel Total 112935: MARGARET UNG 11/25/2019 112936 111119 101-41300-489 Staff Development Event Administration Total 112936: Metro Gas Installers, Mike Ellis 11/25/2019 112937 102419 101-32530 Refund Permit M19-000299 Total 112937: Page: 7 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Invoice Amount 2,345.98 471.00 471.00 7.51 7.51 1,870.56 1,870.56 290.00 290.00 674.68 674.68 376.50 376.50 2,183.44 748.84 2,932.28 37.96 37.96 26.25 26.25 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 11/25/2019 112938 00050362 701-49800-221 Oxygen & Acetylene 30.69 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 11/25/2019 112938 00050363 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 61.05 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 11/25/2019 112938 00050364 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 7.13 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 11/25/2019 112938 20126981 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 106.50 Total 112938: 205.37 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 11/25/2019 112939 P87326 101-45210-221 Rough Mower Steering Knob Golf Course 13.56 Total 112939: 13.56 Minnesota Pollution Control Agen 11/25/2019 112940 SD -2669 602-49450-437 Wastewater certification renewal - B. Rathbun Sewer 23.00 Total 112940: 23.00 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 11/25/2019 112941 20107415-20 101-43000-433 Tree Care registry DJ Goman-20107415-Jan-Dec 2 Public Works Department 25.00 Total 112941: 25.00 Morrie'sAuto Body & Glass 11/25/2019 112942 RG137882 101-42110-402 Squad #253 Repair Police Department 3,427.95 Total 112942: 3,427.95 MOTOROLA 11/25/2019 112943 16077459 101-42110-580 APX radios and accessories (qty 4) Police Department 18,161.00 Total 112943: 18,161.00 MOUND TRUE VALUE 11/25/2019 112944 164425 101-42110-221 Squad Supplies Police Department 17.98 MOUND TRUE VALUE 11/25/2019 112944 164430 101-42110-240 Insulation Police Department 1.99 MOUND TRUE VALUE 11/25/2019 112944 164534 101-42110-240 PD Supplies Police Department 10.58 Total 112944: 30.55 NARTEC Inc 11/25/2019 112945 13390 101-42110-240 Test Ampules, Certification Fee Police Department 426.96 Total 112945: 426.96 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/25/2019 112946 164554 101-42110-322 UPS Shipping Charge Police Department 43.71 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/25/2019 112946 321335 101-43290-800 Christmas Tree Extension Cord Special Projects -Contingencies 103.56 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/25/2019 112946 321354 601-49400-223 Utility Heater Water 59.98 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Department Invoice Amount 207.25 320.00 320.00 Public Works Department 85.00 Public Works Department 659.00 744.00 Police Department 447.00 Public Works Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Central Services 250.04 Sewer 599.50 Total 112946: NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS. 11/25/2019 112947 6732001220 101-21710 Pera life 12/2019 Total 112947: NEWEGG INC 11/25/2019 112948 1302474220 710-49970-221 Computer for Microfiche NEWEGG INC 11/25/2019 112948 1302474223 710-49970-221 Computer for Booking - PD Total 112948: NORTHERN SPECIALITIES INC 11/25/2019 112949 00088651 101-43000-224 Repair Gate at PW NORTHERN SPECIALITIES INC 11/25/2019 112949 00088651 101-43000-404 Repair Gate at PW Total 112949: NORTHERN STAR EXPLORER 11/25/2019 112950 111419 101-42110-229 Orono Police Explorers Post 3776 Renewal Total 112950: OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 3915439920 101-43000-221 Office Supplies - Toner - PD OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 3930741240 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 3966866470 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 3966866480 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 3985424920 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 4000858680 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/25/2019 112951 4000858680 602-49450-201 PW Calendars Total 112951: OPG -3 INC 11/25/2019 112952 3695 710-49970-416 2020 Imaging Support/Licensing Total 112952: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/25/2019 112953 21071 234-45680-404 Lurton Park Vegetation Mgmt Total 112953: Premium Waters Inc 11/25/2019 112954 850551-10-1 101-42110-201 Spring Water Department Invoice Amount 207.25 320.00 320.00 Public Works Department 85.00 Public Works Department 659.00 744.00 Police Department 447.00 Public Works Department 71.99 - Central Services 64.77 Central Services 162.52 Central Services 67.89 Central Services 31.49 - Central Services 250.04 Sewer 599.50 857.50 857.50 Police Department 125.33 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 112954: Richard Crosby 11/25/2019 112955 101119 101-42260-489 Support Fire Operations Fire Protection Services Total 112955: RON OLSON 11/25/2019 112956 111519 101-41900-201 Reimb for Office Supplies Central Services Total 112956: Schneider Excavating and Gradin 11/25/2019 112957 PAY#3 FINAL 651-20600 Old Long Lake Road Ravine Stabilization Final #3 Total 112957: Schugel, James & Jen 11/25/2019 112958 111919 101-22205 Escrow Refund LA19-000093 1971 Fagerness Pt R Total 112958: SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABS 11/25/2019 112959 0424746 -IN 101-42110-240 Drug Tests Police Department Total 112959: STA SAFE LOCKSMITH 11/25/2019 112960 00208173 101-42110-404 Keys Police Department Total 112960: STAR TRIBUNE 11/25/2019 112961 110319 101-42110-208 Subscription Acct 1069427 10/14/19-1/13/20 Police Department Total 112961: STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/25/2019 112962 11391817 101-42110-226 Trouser Pants Police Department STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/25/2019 112962 11392195 101-42110-226 Battery Police Department STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/25/2019 112962 11392835 101-42110-226 Botts & PD Equipment Police Department STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/25/2019 112962 11395446 101-42110-226 Uniform, Equipments Police Department Total 112962: SUSAN SCHULTZ 11/25/2019 112963 111419 101-42110-437 Meal Reimb - 1st Responder Training Police Department Page: 10 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Invoice Amount 125.33 92.61 92.61 34.76 34.76 5,114.88 5,114.88 700.00 700.00 83.63 83.63 22.50 22.50 139.23 139.23 su.99 7.89 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 112963: 7.89 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 11/25/2019 112964 111419 231-45650-307 Vehicle Forfeiture Case #19-009449 1,800.00 Total 112964: 1,800.00 THE GILLESPIE CENTER 11/25/2019 112965 110519 101-41800-490 2019 Annual Grant Human Services 9,500.00 Total 112965: 9,500.00 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2011946 651-49910-240 Shop Supplies Storm Water 39.60 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2011946 602-49450-240 Shop Supplies Sewer 39.60 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2011946 601-49400-240 Shop Supplies Water 39.60 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2011946 101-43000-240 Shop Supplies Public Works Department 39.60 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2310695 101-43000-240 Shop Supplies Public Works Department 14.24 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2310695 601-49400-240 Shop Supplies Water 14.24 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2310695 602-49450-240 Shop Supplies Sewer 14.24 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 2310695 651-49910-240 Shop Supplies Storm Water 14.23 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 5011953 101-45200-223 Big Island Snowmobile Fence Parks 167.16 THE HOME DEPOT 11/25/2019 112966 7011457 101-45200-223 Crystal Bay Temp. Irrigation Parks 87.91 Total 112966: 470.42 THN ENTERPRISES 11/25/2019 112967 2090 101-45200-404 Big Island Dock Transport Parks 3,300.00 Total 112967: 3,300.00 U.S. AutoForce 11/25/2019 112968 6713145 101-42110-402 Squad Tires Police Department 2,752.00 U.S. AutoForce 11/25/2019 112968 6797238 101-42110-402 Squad #258 Winterforce Police Department 571.79 Total 112968: 3,323.79 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-42110-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Police Department 1,868.22 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-41900-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Central Services 251.07 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-42400-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Building & Zoning 70.02 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-43000-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Public Works Department 140.04 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-45200-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Parks 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 101-45210-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Golf Course 147.09 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 601-49400-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Water 158.57 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12 Check Issue Dates: 11/13/2019 - 11/25/2019 Nov 21, 2019 09:58AM Department Sewer Brush Site Golf Course Public Works Department Central Services Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Parks Water Sewer Golf Course Invoice Amount 20.10 40.76 157.55 876.40 31.83 177.78 2,154.89 33.96 5,797.23 2,740.23 13,659.48 379,596.92 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number VERIZON WIRELESS 11/25/2019 112969 9841576961 602-49450-321 Internet 11/7/19-12/6/19 Total 112969: WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 11/25/2019 112970 0060623-280 603-49500-316 Recycling 11/2019 Total 112970: Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 11/25/2019 112971 3502758870 101-45220-381 Brush Site 10/1/19-11/1/19 Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 11/25/2019 112971 3502758870 101-45210-381 GC Security 12/1-12/31/19 Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 11/25/2019 112971 3502758870 101-43000-381 Electical Service 10/1/19-11/1/19 Total 112971: XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-41900-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-42110-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-42110-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-43000-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-43000-386 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-45200-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 601-49400-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 602-49450-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 XCEL ENERGY 11/25/2019 112972 660310696 101-45210-381 Electric 9/17/19-10/16/19 Total 112972: Grand Totals: Department Sewer Brush Site Golf Course Public Works Department Central Services Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Parks Water Sewer Golf Course Invoice Amount 20.10 40.76 157.55 876.40 31.83 177.78 2,154.89 33.96 5,797.23 2,740.23 13,659.48 379,596.92 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 3 Date: November 25, 2019 Item Description: Approval of 2020 Liquor Licenses Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2020 Liquor License Renewals. 2019 ANNUAL LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS — APPLICANTS • Orono Liquor Inc. DBA Narrows Saloon 3380 Shoreline Drive Navarre, MN 55392 • Orono Public Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard Road South Orono, MN 55391 • O'Sullivans HolidayNoyageur Service Centers 2420 Shadywood Road Navarre, MN 55392 • Spring Hill Golf Club 725 County Road 6 Wayzata, MN 55391 • Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 • Wood & Associates Inc. DBA Navarre Liquors 3421 Shoreline Drive Navarre, MN 55392 • Woodhill Country Club, Inc. 200 Woodhill Road Orono, MN 55391 The 2020 Liquor License Applicants have submitted all the requested documents and have met all requirements. The documents are on file in the City Clerk's office. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the above listed liquor license renewals for 2020. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -1V AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Date: November 25, 2019 Item Description: Liquor Violation — Orono Golf Course Presenter: Soren Mattick, Agenda Consent Agenda City Attorney Section: Purpose. The purpose of this item is to present a liquor violation to the City Council. Background. The Orono Police Department conducts periodic compliance checks with all establishments licensed to sell tobacco and liquor within the City of Orono. When an establishment sells tobacco or liquor to a person that is not eligible to purchase these items, the City Code imposes a presumptive penalty on the licensee. In July of 2019 at the City's Golf Course alcohol was sold to an underage person in violation. A violation also occurred in August 2016. Pursuant to Orono City Code, any individual who sells or provides any alcohol to a person under the age of twenty-one (2 1) years within three (3) years of a previous violation is subject to an administrative civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1000) and a three (3) day suspension (City Code 34.23). As such, the liquor license issued to the Golf Course will be suspended for May 4, 5, and 6, 2020. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to approve the suspension of the liquor license issued for Orono Golf Course for May 4, 5, and 6 of 2020. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: November 25, 2019 Item Description: Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement with Verizon Wireless Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda Director of Public Works/City Section: Engineer 1. Purpose. The purpose of this council action is to gain council approval of a Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement with Verizon Wireless. 2. Background. Verizon Wireless has submitted a collocation agreement to the City for review and adoption. The agreement dictates the process for Verizon to place small wireless facilities on City owned structures within the city Right of Way. 3. Staff Recommendation. The agreement has been reviewed by the City Engineer, Finance Director, administrator and Attorney. Staff finds the agreement to comply with federal state and city code. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to adopt the attached Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement with Verizon Wireless, LLC. Exhibits A. Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement Prepared By: Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By -19a City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement This Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement (the "Agreement") is made this day of , 20_, between the City of Orono, a Minnesota local government unit, with its principal offices located at 2750 Kelley Parkway in Orono, Minnesota 55323 ("Lessor) and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, with its principal offices located at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW 100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 ("Lessee"). Lessor and Lessee are collectively referred to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party." WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, authorizes Lessor to manage and control access to and use of public rights-of-way within city limits; and WHEREAS, Lessor has elected to manage its rights-of-way as authorized by Minnesota Statues, Sections 237.162-.163 and Lessor's municipal code of ordinances Chapter 18, Article IV. Right -of -Way Management; and WHEREAS, this Agreement shall apply to the collocation of Small Wireless Facilities (as hereinafter defined). "Collocate" or "collocation" means to install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing Wireless Support Structure (as hereinafter defined) that is owned by a local government unit; and WHEREAS, a "Small Wireless Facility" means: (1) a wireless facility, as defined by Minnesota Statues, Section 237.162, subd. 13, that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all its exposed elements could fit within an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet; and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility, excluding electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment, is in aggregate no more than 28 cubic feet in volume; or (2) a micro wireless facility as defined by Minnesota Statues, Section 237.162, subd. 14; and WHEREAS, Lessor owns or controls existing structures in the public right-of-way that are designed to support or determined by Lessor as capable of supporting a Small Wireless Facility ("Wireless Support Structure"), which are located within the geographic area of a license held by Lessee to provide wireless services; and WHEREAS, Lessor has elected to set forth the terms and conditions of collocation on its Wireless Support Structures, and Lessee desires to install, maintain and operate Small Wireless Facilities on Lessor's Wireless Support Structures; and WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to enter into this Agreement to define the general terms and conditions which will govern their relationship with respect to the particular sites at City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 48063050 which Lessee will collocate its Small Wireless Facilities on Lessor's Wireless Support Structures; and WHEREAS, Lessee shall compensate Lessor for the collocation of Small Wireless Facilities on Lessor's Wireless Support Structures. The fees imposed by Lessor are (1) based on the actual costs incurred by Lessor in managing the public rights-of-way; (2) based on an allocation among all users of the public rights-of-way, including Lessor, which shall reflect the proportionate costs imposed Lessor by each of the various types of uses of the public rights-of- way; (3) imposed on a competitively neutral basis; and (4) imposed in a manner so that above ground uses of public rights-of-way do not bear costs incurred by the local government unit to regulate underground uses of public rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that they will enter into an agreement supplement ("Supplement") in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with respect to each particular Wireless Support Structure on which Lessee will collocate; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is not exclusive and Lessor reserves the right to grant permission to other eligible and qualified entities to collocate Small Wireless Facilities in Lessor's rights-of-way and this Agreement does not limit any rights Lessee may have in accordance with Laws to install its own poles in the public right-of-way or to attach Lessee's equipment to third party poles located in the public right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. PREMISES. Pursuant to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable Supplement, Lessor agrees to lease to Lessee certain space described in the applicable Supplement upon Lessor's Wireless Support Structure in the public right-of-way (Lessor's Wireless Support Structure, personal property, public right-of-way and surrounding real property are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the "Property"), for the installation, operation and maintenance of Small Wireless Facilities; together with the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress from a public right-of-way, seven (7) days a week, twenty four (24) hours a day, over, under and through the Property to and from the Premises (as hereinafter defined) for the purpose of installation, operation and maintenance of Lessee's Small Wireless Facilities. The space leased by Lessor to Lessee described in the applicable Supplement is hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Premises." The Premises may include, without limitation, certain space on the ground (the "Equipment Space") on the Property, and space on the Wireless Support Structure sufficient for the installation, operation and maintenance of antennas and other equipment (the "Antenna Space") as described in the Supplement. Notwithstanding anything in the Supplement to the contrary, the Premises under each Supplement shall include such additional space necessary for the installation, operation and maintenance of wires, cables, conduits, and pipes (the "Cabling Space") running between and among the various portions of the Premises and to all necessary electrical and telephone utility, cable, and fiber sources located within the Property. If there are not sufficient electric and telephone utility, cable, or fiber sources located on the Property, Lessor agrees to grant Lessee, or the local utility, or fiber or cable provider, upon Lessee's approval, the right to install any utilities, cable, and fiber on, City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 2 48063050 through, over, and under other properties owned or controlled by Lessor necessary for Lessee to operate its communications facility, provided the location of those utilities, cable, and fiber shall be as reasonably designated by Lessor. Lessor's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2. PLANS AND DRAWINGS. Before receiving approval from Lessor to install a Small Wireless Facility on Lessor's Wireless Support Structures in public rights-of-way, Lessee shall submit to the Director of Public Works or the Director's designee, detailed construction plans and drawings for each individual location, together with maps, showing specifically the Wireless Support Structures to be used, the number and character of the attachments to be placed on such Wireless Support Structures, equipment necessary for the use, proposed replacement of existing Wireless Support Structures and any new installations for transmission conduit, pull boxes, and related appurtenances. The Director or the Director's designee shall determine, within the ninety (90) day time frame imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 237.162-.163, whether to give Lessee permission to proceed with the work as proposed by Lessee. As required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 237.162-.163, if the ninety (90) day time frame expires without rejection by the Director of Public Works or the Director's designee, Lessee's submission shall be deemed approved. Lessee shall perform all work at its own expense and make attachments in such manner as to not interfere with the services of Lessor. This Agreement is not intended to in any way limit or waive either Party's present or future rights under applicable state and federal law. 3. CONDITION OF PROPERTY; ENGINEERING STUDY. Any expenses necessary to make the Premises ready for Lessee's construction of its improvements shall be the responsibility of Lessee. Lessee must obtain and submit to Lessor a structural engineering study carried out by a qualified structural engineer showing the Wireless Support Structure and foundation is able to support the proposed Small Wireless Facility. Lessor makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use, except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. 4. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. A. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee the right to use the municipal public right-of-way for the installation, maintenance and operation of Lessee's communications equipment in and on the Wireless Support Structure located within the public right-of-way. B. All communications equipment shall be installed in accordance with applicable Laws (as hereinafter defined) and Lessee shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations adopted by Lessor. Within the public rights-of-way, the location of the communications equipment shall be subject to the reasonable and proper regulation, direction and control of the Lessor, or the official to whom such duties have been delegated by Lessor. Lessee shall have no ownership interest in any Wireless Support Structure owned by Lessor. C. Lessee and its authorized contractors shall give Lessor reasonable notice of the dates, location, and nature of all work to be performed on its communications equipment within the public rights-of-way. This Agreement shall allow Lessee to perform all work on Lessee's communications equipment within the public rights-of-way, and to park vehicles in the streets City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 3 48063050 and other public rights-of-way when necessary for the installation, replacement, abandonment, operation or maintenance of Lessee's communications equipment. Following completion of work in the public rights-of-way, Lessee shall repair any affected public rights-of-way as soon as possible, but no later than the time frame established in the applicable Supplement. No street, alley, highway, or public place shall be encumbered for a longer period than shall be reasonably necessary to execute the work authorized by the applicable Supplement and this Agreement. D. Any damages to Lessor's Wireless Support Structures, equipment thereon or other infrastructure caused by Lessee's installation or operations shall be repaired or replaced at Lessee's sole cost. 5. STRUCTURE RECONDITIONING, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT. A. From time to time, if Lessor paints, reconditions, or otherwise improves or repairs the Wireless Support Structure in a substantial way ("Reconditioning Work"), Lessor shall reasonably cooperate with Lessee to carry out Reconditioning Work activities in a manner that minimizes interference with Lessee's approved use of the Premises. B. Prior to commencing Reconditioning Work, Lessor shall provide Lessee with not less than thirty (30) days' prior written notice. Upon receiving that notice, it shall be Lessee's sole responsibility to provide adequate measures to cover or otherwise protect Lessee's equipment from the consequences of the Reconditioning Work, including but not limited to paint and debris fallout. Lessor reserves the right to require Lessee to remove all of Lessee's equipment from the Wireless Support Structure and Premises during Reconditioning Work, provided the requirement to remove Lessee's equipment is contained in the written notice required by this Section and Lessor provides such notice at least sixty (60) days in advance of the Reconditioning Work. C. During Lessor's Reconditioning Work, Lessee may maintain a temporary communications facility on the Property, or after approval by Lessor, on any land owned or controlled by Lessor in the vicinity of the Property. If the Property will not accommodate Lessee's temporary communications facility, or if the Parties cannot agree on a temporary location, the Lessee, at its sole option, shall have the right to terminate the applicable Supplement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Lessor. D. Lessee may request a modification of Lessor's procedures for carrying out Reconditioning Work in order to reduce the interference with Lessee's use of the Premises. If Lessor agrees to the modification, Lessee shall be responsible for all reasonable incremental cost related to the modification. E. If Lessor intends to replace a Wireless Support Structure ("Replacement Work"), Lessor shall provide Lessee with at least sixty (60) days' written notice to remove its equipment. Lessor shall also promptly notify Lessee when the Wireless Support Structure has been replaced and Lessee may re -install its equipment. During Lessor's Replacement Work, Lessee may maintain a temporary communications facility on the Property, or after approval by Lessor, on any land owned or controlled by Lessor in the vicinity of the Property. If the Property will not City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 4 48063050 accommodate Lessee's temporary communications facility or if the Parties cannot agree on a temporary location, the Lessee, at its sole option, shall have the right to terminate the applicable Supplement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Lessor. F. If Lessor intends to repair a Wireless Support Structure due to storm or other damage ("Repair Work"), Lessor shall notify Lessee to remove its equipment as soon as possible. In the event of an emergency, Lessor shall contact Lessee by telephone call to Lessee's Network Monitoring Center at (800) 624-6620 prior to removing Lessee's Equipment. Once the Wireless Support Structure has been replaced or repaired, Lessor will promptly notify Lessee it can reinstall its equipment. During Lessor's Repair Work, Lessee may maintain a temporary communications facility on the Property, or after approval by Lessor, on any land owned or controlled by Lessor in the vicinity of the Property. If the Property will not accommodate Lessee's temporary communications facility, or if the Parties cannot agree on a temporary location, or if the Wireless Support Structure cannot be repaired or replaced within thirty (30) days, Lessee, at its sole discretion, shall have the right to terminate the applicable Supplement upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Lessor. However, at Lessee's sole option, within thirty (30) days after the casualty damage, Lessor must provide Lessee with a replacement Supplement to lease space at a new location upon which the Parties mutually agree. The monthly rental payable under the new replacement Supplement will not be greater than the monthly rental payable under the terminated Supplement. G. If Lessee's installation requires an existing Wireless Support Structure to be replaced by Lessee (the "Replacement Wireless Support Structure") then, any such Replacement Wireless Support Structure, shall be deemed to be a fixture on the Property and the Replacement Wireless Support Structure shall be and remain the property of the Lessor, without further consideration to or from Lessor, and without documentation required from Lessee. Upon completion of Lessee's installation, Lessor shall be responsible for any and all costs relating to the operation, maintenance, repair and disposal of the Replacement Wireless Support Structure, except to the extent such costs are due to the negligent installation by Lessee or contractor hired by Lessee. If the Replacement Wireless Support Structure replaces an existing structure, then also as part of Lessee's installation, Lessee shall remove, dispose, salvage and or discard the existing structure at Lessee's sole discretion. 6. TERM; RENTAL. Each Supplement shall be effective as of the date of execution by both Parties (the "Effective Date"), provided however, the term of each Supplement shall commence on the first day of the month following the day that Lessee commences installation of its equipment on the Premises (the "Commencement Date"), at which time rental payments shall commence and be due at a total annual rental of $175.00 (the "Annual Rental"), representing $150.00 per year for rent to occupy space on a Wireless Support Structure, $25.00 per year for maintenance associated with the space occupied on a wireless support structure, and all other right-of-way management costs. Consistent with Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.162-.163, the term of each Supplement shall be equal to the length of time that the Small Wireless Facility is in use (the "Term"), unless the Supplement is terminated pursuant to this Agreement. The annual rental for each Supplement shall be set forth in the Supplement and shall be paid in advance annually on each anniversary of the Commencement Date, to the payee designated by Lessor in the Supplement, or to such other person, firm or place as Lessor may, from time to time, City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 5 48063050 designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date by notice given in accordance with Paragraph 19 below. Lessor and Lessee agree that they shall acknowledge in writing the Commencement Date of each Supplement. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that the initial rental payment for each Supplement may not actually be sent by Lessee until ninety (90) days after Lessee's receipt of written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date of each Supplement. Upon agreement of the Parties, Lessee may pay rent by electronic funds transfer. Lessor hereby agrees to provide to Lessee the reasonable documentation required for Lessee to pay all rent payments due to Lessor, including a completed, most current version of Internal Revenue Service Form W-9. Annual Rental shall accrue in accordance with this Agreement, but lessee may not deliver rental payments for up to ninety (90) days after the requested documentation has been received by Lessee. 7. ELECTRICAL. Lessor shall, at all times during the Term of each Supplement, provide electrical service and telephone service access within the Premises. As provided by Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.162-.163, an annual fee for electricity used to operate the Small Wireless Facility, if not purchased directly from a utility, shall be paid with the annual rent due under each Supplement at the rate of. A. $876.00 per radio node less than or equal to 100 max watts; B. $2,184.00 per radio node over 100 max watts; C. The actual costs of electricity, if the actual costs exceed the amount in item (A) or (B); or D. As agreed upon by Lessor and Lessee. The amount of any such annual fee shall be set forth in each Supplement. Lessee shall be permitted at any time during the Term of each Supplement, to install, maintain, and/or provide access to and use of, as necessary (during any power interruption at the Premises), a temporary power source and a temporary installation of any other services and equipment required to keep Lessee's communications facility operational, along with all related equipment and appurtenances within the Premises, or elsewhere on the Property in such locations as reasonably approved by Lessor. Lessee shall have the right to install conduits connecting the temporary power source, and the temporary installation of any other services and equipment required to keep Lessee's communications facility operational, and related appurtenances to the Premises. Alternatively, Lessee may purchase electricity directly from a utility provider. 8. APPLICATION FEES AND ENGINEERING COSTS. The Parties acknowledge and agree that, pursuant to the FCC Order and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 237.162-.163, Lessor may charge a non-recurring application fee not to exceed $500 for an application to collocate on existing structures for up to five facilities and $100 for each additional facility beyond five (the "Application Fee"), which shall cover all of Lessor's non-recurring fees. The Application Fee shall be paid with the submission of each Supplement. 9. USE. Lessee shall use the Premises for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and operating Small Wireless Facilities and uses incidental thereto. As long as the City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 6 48063050 modified installation meets the definition of a Small Wireless Facility, Lessee shall have the right, without any increase in rent, to replace, repair, or otherwise modify its utilities, fiber or cable, equipment, antennas and/or conduits or any portion thereof, and the frequencies over which the equipment operates. Any additions shall require Lessor's written approval, which shall not be unreasonably conditioned, withheld or delayed. 10. GOVERMENTAL APPROVALS; PERMITS. It is understood and agreed that Lessee's ability to use the Premises is contingent upon Lessee obtaining all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the "Government Approvals") that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities, as well as a satisfactory structural analysis that will permit Lessee use of the Premises as set forth above. The parties acknowledge and agree that a right-of-way permit application will be submitted for each Supplement. Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee in its effort to obtain the Governmental Approvals, and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property with respect to the proposed use thereof by Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to terminate the applicable Supplement if. (i) any of the applications for Governmental Approvals is finally rejected; (ii) any Governmental Approval issued to Lessee is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority; (iii) Lessee determines that the Governmental Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner; (iv) Lessee determines that the Premises is no longer technically compatible for its use; or (v) Lessee, in its sole discretion, determines that the use of the Premises is obsolete or unnecessary. Notice of Lessee's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to Lessor in accordance with the notice provisions set forth in Paragraph 19 and shall be effective upon the mailing of that notice by Lessee, or upon such later date as designated by Lessee. All rentals paid to the termination date shall be retained by Lessor. Upon such termination, the applicable Supplement shall be of no further force or effect except to the extent of the representations, warranties, and indemnities made by each Party to the other thereunder. Otherwise, the Lessee shall have no further obligations for the payment of rent to Lessor for the terminated Supplement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Lessor, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the extent caused by Lessee's use of the Premises or Lessee's breach of this Agreement. Lessee's indemnification obligation shall apply to Lessee's contractors, subcontractors, or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Lessee, or anyone for whose acts Lessee may be liable. Lessee's indemnification obligation shall not apply to any liability resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or other indemnified party. Lessor will provide Lessee with prompt, written notice of any written claim covered by this indemnification provision; provided that any failure of Lessor to provide any such notice, or to provide it promptly, shall not relieve Lessee from its indemnification obligations in respect of such claim, except to the extent Lessee can establish actual prejudice and direct damages as a result thereof. Lessor will cooperate with Lessee in connection with Lessee's defense of such claim. Lessee shall not settle or compromise any such claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of Lessor and without an unconditional release of all claims by each claimant or plaintiff in favor of Lessor. The indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. Neither party will be liable under this Agreement for consequential, special, punitive or indirect City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 7 48063050 damages, whether under theory of contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise. 12. INSURANCE. A. Waiver of Subrogation. To the extent allowed by law, Each Party hereby waives and release any and all rights of action for negligence against the Other Party which may hereafter arise on account of damage to property, resulting from any fire, or other casualty of the kind covered by standard fire insurance policies with extended coverage, regardless of whether or not, or in what amounts, such insurance is now or hereafter carried by Each Party. This waiver and release shall apply between the Parties and shall also apply to any claim asserted as a right of subrogation. All such policies of insurance obtained by Each Party concerning its property shall waive the insurer's right of subrogation against the Other Party. B. General Liability. Lessee agrees that at its own cost and expense, it will maintain commercial general liability insurance with limits of $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury (including death) and property damage; and $4,000,000 general aggregate including premises - operations, products -completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury, and contractual liability. Lessee shall include the Lessor as an additional insured as their interest may appear under this Agreement. C. Automobile Liability. Lessee shall maintain commercial automobile liability Insurance covering all owned, hired, and non -owned automobiles, with a combined single limit of $2,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage. D. Workers' Compensation. Lessee agrees to provide workers' compensation insurance for all its employees in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota and employers' liability insurance with limits as follows: $500,000 each accident for bodily injury; $500,000 disease each employee; $500,000 disease -policy limit. E. Additional Insurance Conditions. (i) Lessee shall deliver to Lessor a certificate of insurance as evidence that the above coverages are in full force and effect. (ii) Lessee's policies shall be primary insurance and non-contributory to any other valid and collectible insurance available to Lessor with respect to any claim arising under this Agreement. (iii) Upon receipt of notice from its insurer(s) Lessee shall provide the City with thirty (30) days' advanced written notice of cancellation of any required coverage. 13. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Except for indemnification obligations pursuant to Paragraph 11, neither Party shall be liable to the other, or any of their respective agents, representatives, employees for any lost revenue, lost profits, loss of technology, rights or services, incidental, punitive, indirect, special or consequential damages, loss of data, or interruption or loss of use of service, even if advised of the possibility of such damages, whether under theory of contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise. Lessee shall not City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 8 48063050 be liable or responsible for addressing environmental conditions that do not result from the activities of Lessee. 14. INTERFERENCE. If there are any current communications facilities that are located on or near a Wireless Support Structure, and at the Lessor's request, Lessee shall obtain a radio frequency interference study carried out by a professional radio frequency engineer showing that Lessee's intended use will not interfere with such existing use(s). Lessee shall not transmit or receive radio waves at the Premises until such evaluation has been satisfactorily completed and approved by Lessor, such approval not to be unreasonably conditioned, withheld or delayed. Lessee agrees to install equipment of the type and frequency which will not cause harmful interference which is measurable in accordance with then existing industry standards to any equipment of Lessor or other tenants of the Property which existed on the Property prior to the date the applicable Supplement is executed by the Parties. In the event any after -installed Lessee's equipment causes such interference, and after Lessor has notified Lessee of such interference by calling Lessee's Network Monitoring Center at (800) 624-6620, Lessee will take all commercially reasonable steps necessary to correct and eliminate the interference, including but not limited to, at Lessee's option, powering down such interfering equipment and later powering up such interfering equipment for intermittent testing. If the interference continues for a period in excess of 48 hours following such notification, Lessor shall have the right to require Lessee to reduce power, and/or cease operations until such time Lessee can make repairs to the interfering equipment. In no event will Lessor be entitled to terminate a Supplement or relocate the Equipment as long as Lessee is making a good faith effort to remedy the interference issue. Lessor agrees that Lessor and/or any other users of the Property who currently have or in the future take possession of the Property will be permitted to install only such equipment that is of the type and frequency which will not cause harmful interference which is measurable in accordance with then existing industry standards to the then existing equipment of Lessee. If Lessee determines, in its reasonable discretion, that Lessor's equipment or any other user's equipment permitted by Lessor is causing interference, Lessor shall, upon written communication from Lessee to Lessor take all reasonable steps necessary to correct and eliminate the interference, including causing other users causing such interference to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference continues for a period in excess of 48 hours following the notification, Lessor shall, or shall require any other user to, reduce power and/or cease operations until such time as Lessor, or the other user, can make repairs to the interfering equipment. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this Paragraph and therefore, either Party shall have the right to equitable remedies, such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance. 15. REMOVAL. Lessee shall, within ninety (90) days after expiration of the Term, or any earlier termination of a Supplement, or an abandonment of its facilities, remove its equipment, conduits, fixtures and all personal property and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted, at Lessee's sole cost and expense. Lessor agrees and acknowledges that all of the equipment, conduits, fixtures and personal property of Lessee shall remain the personal property of Lessee and Lessee shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable Laws. If the time for removal causes Lessee to remain on the City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 9 48063050 Premises after termination of the Supplement, Lessee shall pay rent at the then -existing monthly rate, until such time as the removal of the equipment, fixtures and all personal property are completed. If Lessee fails to remove its facilities within the required time period, Lessor reserves the right to remove the facilities and charge Lessee for the full cost of the removal and storage charges. 16. RIGHTS UPON SALE. If, at any time during the Term of any Supplement, Lessor decides: (i) to sell or transfer all or any part of the Property or the Wireless Support Structure thereon to a purchaser other than Lessee, or (ii) to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in that portion of the Property occupied by Lessee, or a larger portion thereof, for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof, that sale or grant of an easement or interest therein shall be subject to the Supplement, and any such purchaser or transferee must recognize Lessee's rights hereunder and under the terms of the affected Supplement(s). If Lessor completes any such sale, transfer, or grant described in this paragraph without executing an assignment of the Supplement in which the third party agrees in writing to assume all obligations of Lessor under the Supplement, then Lessor shall not be released from its obligations to Lessee under the Supplement, and Lessee shall have the right to look to Lessor and the third party for the full performance of the Supplement. 17. QUIET ENJOYMENT AND REPRESENTATIONS. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying the rent and performing the covenants herein and in a Supplement, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee as of the execution date of each Supplement, and covenants during the Term, that Lessor is has good and sufficient title and interest to the Property, and has full authority to enter into and execute the Supplement. Lessor further covenants during the Term that there are no liens, judgments or impediments of title on the Property, or affecting Lessor's title to the same and that there are no covenants, easements or restrictions that prevent or adversely affect the use or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee as provided in this Agreement and in the applicable Supplement(s). 18. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement and each Supplement under it may be sold, assigned or transferred by the Lessee without any approval or consent of the Lessor to the Lessee's principal, affiliates, subsidiaries of its principal, or to any entity which acquires all or substantially all of Lessee's assets in the market defined by the FCC in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization. As to other parties, this Agreement and each Supplement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the Lessor, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. 19. NOTICES. All notices hereunder must be in writing and are validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows or to any other address that the Party to be notified may have designated: City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 10 48063050 Lessor: City of Orono Attention: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55323 Lessee: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing. 20. DEFAULT. If there is a breach by a Party with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement, or under the provisions of an individual Supplement, the non -breaching Party shall give the breaching Party written notice of that breach. After receipt of the written notice, the breaching Party shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure the breach, provided the breaching Party shall have such extended period as may be required beyond the thirty (30) days if the breaching Party commences the cure within the thirty (30) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion, but in no event more than ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of written notice. The non -breaching Party may not maintain any action or effect any remedies for default against the breaching Party unless and until the breaching Party has failed to cure the breach within the time periods provided in this Paragraph. 21. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 20, the Parties shall cooperate and use their best efforts to ensure that the various provisions of the Agreement are fulfilled. The Parties agree to act in good faith to undertake resolution of disputes, in an equitable and timely manner and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 22. CASUALTY. In the event of damage by fire or other casualty to the Property that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within forty-five (45) days following same or, if the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so that such damage may reasonably be expected to disrupt Lessee's operations at the Premises for more than forty-five (45) days, then Lessee may, at any time following such fire or other casualty, provided Lessor has not completed the restoration required to permit Lessee to resume its operation at the Premises, terminate the Supplement upon fifteen (15) days' prior written notice to Lessor. Any such notice of termination shall cause the Supplement to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date originally set as the expiration date of the Supplement and the Parties shall make an appropriate adjustment, as of such termination date, with respect to payments due under the Supplement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rent shall abate during the period of repair following such fire or other casualty in proportion to the degree to which Lessee's use of the Premises is impaired. 23. APPLICABLE LAWS. Applicable Laws means any and all laws, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, judicial decisions, rules, permits and approvals applicable to the subject City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 11 48063050 of this Agreement or Lessee's use that are in force during the term of this Agreement, as lawfully amended including, without limitation, Lessor's city Code and the rules, regulations and orders of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), including but not limited to FCC 18-133 issued by the FCC adopted September 26, 2018 and released September 27, 2018. Lessee and Lessor shall comply with all Applicable Laws. This Agreement does not limit any rights Lessee may have in accordance with Laws to install its own poles in the right of way or to attach Lessee's equipment to third -party poles located in the right of way. This Agreement shall in no way limit or waive either party's present or future rights under Applicable Law. If, after the date of this Agreement, the rights or obligations of either Party are materially altered, preempted, or superseded by changes in Applicable Law, the parties agree to amend the Agreement and/or Supplement to reflect the change in Applicable Law. 24. GOVERNMENT DATA. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is considered public data not on individuals and is accessible to the public under Minnesota Statutes, Section 13.03. Lessee and Lessor agrees to abide by the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statues, Chapter 13, and all other applicable state or federal rules, regulations or orders pertaining to privacy or confidentiality. 25. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior or contemporaneous representations or agreements, whether written or oral, between the Parties and contains the entire agreement. B. Captions. Captions contained in this Agreement are for reference only, and therefore, have no effect in construing this Agreement. C. Ambiguities. If any term of this Agreement is ambiguous, it shall not be construed for or against any Party on the basis that the Party did or did not write it. D. Amendments. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall require a written agreement signed by both Parties. E. Third Party Rights. This Agreement is not a third party beneficiary contract and shall not in any respect whatsoever create any rights on behalf of any person or entity not expressly a party to this Agreement. F. Nondiscrimination. In the hiring of employees or contractors to perform work under this Agreement, Lessee shall not discriminate against any person by reason of any characteristic or classification protected by State or Federal law. G. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. H. Waiver. The failure of either Parry to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or the waiver by either Party of any breach or failure to City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 12 48063050 comply with any provision of this Agreement by the other Party shall not be construed as, or constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this Agreement. I. Force Majeure. Except for payment of sums due, neither Party shall be liable to the other or deemed in default under this Agreement, if and to the extent that a Party's performance is prevented by reason of force majeure. "Force majeure" includes war, an act of terrorism, fire, earthquake, flood and other circumstances which are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Party affected and which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the Party affected was unable to prevent. J. Further Assurances. From and after the execution of this Agreement, the parties shall fully cooperate with each other and perform any further act(s) and execute and deliver any further documents which may be necessary in order to carry out the purposes and intentions of this Agreement. K. Savings Clause. If any court finds any portion of this Agreement to be contrary to law, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. L. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and which taken together shall be deemed to be one and the same document. M. Conflicts with the Code. The insurance and indemnity provisions of the Code are hereby superseded by the insurance and indemnity provisions of this Agreement. Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows. City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 13 48063050 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties, have caused this Agreement to be approved on the date above. Lessor: City of Orono By: Name: Its: Date: By:_ Name: Its: Date: Lessee: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By:_ Name: Its: Date: City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 14 48063050 EXHIBIT A COLLOCATION AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT This Collocation Agreement Supplement ("Supplement"), is made this day of , 20 between the City of Orono, a Minnesota local government unit, with its principal offices located at 2750 Kelley Parkway in Orono, Minnesota 55323 ("Lessor") and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, with its principal offices located at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW 100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 ("Lessee"). 1. SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY COLLOCATION AGREEMENT. This Supplement is a Supplement as referenced in that certain Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement between the City of Orono and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, dated , 20 , (the "Agreement"). All of the terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof without the necessity of repeating or attaching the Agreement. In the event of a contradiction, modification or inconsistency between the terms of the Agreement and this Supplement, the terms of this Supplement shall govern. Capitalized terms used in this Supplement shall have the same meaning described for them in the Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein. 2. PREMISES. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee certain spaces on and within Lessor's Property located at , including the location of the Wireless Support Structure on the Property is shown on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Equipment Space, Antenna Space and Cabling Space are as shown on Exhibit 2, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. TERM. The Commencement Date and the Term of this Supplement shall be as set forth in the Agreement. 4. CONSIDERATION. Rent under this Supplement shall be $175.00 per year, payable to the City of Orono at as set forth in the Agreement If Lessor is providing electricity pursuant to Paragraph 7 of the Agreement, an annual electrical service fee shall be added to the annual rent due under this Supplement. 5. SITE SPECIFIC TERMS. (In this section include any site-specific terms, including whether Lessee will be installing a Replacement Wireless Support Structure.) City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 15 48063050 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties, have caused this Agreement to be approved on the date above. Lessor: City of Orono By: [not for execution — exhibit only] Name: Its: Date: By: [not for execution — exhibit only] Name: Its: Date: Lessee: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By:�jnot for execution — exhibit only] Name: Its:_ Date: City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 16 48063050 EXHIBIT 1 Site Plan of Property City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 17 4806305v3 EXHIBIT 2 Equipment Space (if any), Antenna Space and Cabling Space City of Orono, Minnesota Small Wireless Facility Collocation Agreement 18 4806305v3 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 6 Date: November 25, 2019 Item Description: Accept Resignation & Resolution of Appreciation for Sandy Pettit Presenter Ron Olson, Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval accepting Sandy Pettit's letter of resignation and to recognize Sandy Pettit for 21 years of service to the City of Orono. Background. Sandy Pettit was hired as a Payroll/Utility Billing Clerk on March 16, 1998. On October 23, 2019, Sandy submitted a letter of resignation from her position with the City of Orono. Her last day in office will be November 27, 2019 and official termination date being December 15, 2019. The City of Orono and its staff wish Sandy Pettit the best of luck in all of her future endeavors and appreciate the years of service she dedicated to servicing the City of Orono, the residents and staff. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the resignation of Sandy Pettit effective December 15, 2019 and adopt a Resolution of Appreciation to Sandy Pettit for her 21 years of service to the City of Orono. Exhibits A. Resolution of Appreciation to Sandy Pettit Prepared By: A. Carlson Reviewed By: 5bV Approved By: -S A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO SANDY PETTIT FOR HER 21 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION NO. 7047 WHEREAS, Sandy has served the City of Orono since March 16, 1998 as the City's Utility Billing / Payroll Clerk; and WHEREAS, Sandy has demonstrated thorough bookkeeping of the City's Human Resources records; and WHEREAS, Sandy has diligently provided concise records and the processing of the City's Employee Payroll and benefits and Utility Billing; and WHEREAS, Sandy earned both respect and friendship of residents, contractors as well as city staff members; and WHEREAS, Sandy's years with the City have been marked by a strong commitment, work ethic and respect and has proven great success and admiration; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to Sandy Pettit for her dedicated service to the City, and does commend her for the manner in which she has carried out her duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby extend to Sandy its best wishes for success in her future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 25th day of November, 2019. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Item Description: Non -Waiver of Tort Limits Date: November 25, 2019 Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to adopt a resolution making a selection not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability. 2. Background. Minnesota Statutes 466.04 limits a city's tort liability to a maximum of $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. Because cities have the right to waive the liability limit, our insurance carrier, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), requires that the City Council adopt a resolution stipulating whether the City will or will not waive the statutory limits under the laws. A waiver of the limits would result in increased liability exposure and an increase in premiums. 3. Cost. Because waiver of the statutory limits increases the amount that the LMCIT could potentially be responsible for, waiver of the limit will increase the city's general liability insurance premium by approximately 3.5% ($3,500). The City also carries excess liability coverage in the amount of $2,000,000. A wavier of tort limits would increase this premium by 25% ($8,600). 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the adoption of the resolution not to waive tort limits. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt a resolution making a selection not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability purposes. Exhibits A. LMCIT Liability Limits Information B. Resolution C. Tort Limit Waiver Form Prepared By: 21(9 Reviewed By: 5b Approved By lb)X RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 4 3. Risks for which specialty coverage is needed • Aircrafts (a drone is not considered an "aircraft" if it's not designed for the transport of persons or property). • Architects. • Big boats. • Doctors, most nurses, dentists, pharmacists, and psychologists. See Section HL& Liquor . Liquor sales. liability. See section 1113, Special • Motorized amusement rides, such as carnival rides. events. • Motor vehicle demolition derbies, racing, pulling contests, or stunt driving. • Prisons. • Railroads. See Section III.T, Special • Rodeos. events. • Specialty type operations such as hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and licensed child care programs. See Section IILT, Special • Stunting activities or events that involve a significant risk of serious injury events. to the participant, performer, or others, such as high -wire acts, base or bungee jumping, skydiving, circus type acts, and acts involving dangerous animals. D. Coverage limits LMCIT gives members options for structuring their liability coverage. Members can also choose either to waive or not to waive the monetary tort caps the statutes provide. It can also select from among several liability coverage limits. 1. LMCIT primary liability limits Minn. Stat. § 466.04. The statutory municipal tort liability is limited to a maximum of $500,000 per claimant and $1.5 million per occurrence. These limits apply whether the claim is against the city, against the individual officer or employee, or against both. LMCIT's liability coverage provides a standard limit of $2 million per occurrence. Higher limits are in place for a couple reasons. See Section H.D.3.a, First, the statutory liability limit caps the city's liability for many types of Statutory limits may not apply. claims. But some types of liability claims aren't subject to the statutory tort caps, so the city's potential liability is unlimited for some types of claims. Second, it's increasingly more common to see contracts require more than the statutory limit. A more common figure is $2 million. LMCIT's higher limit meets this requirement, but if even higher limits are required, there is the See section H.D.3, option to carry LMCIT's excess liability coverage. LMCIT can in some cases Purchasing higher liability also issue an endorsement to increase the city's coverage limit only for claims limits. relating to a particular contract. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 4 RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 5 In addition to the LMCIT coverage limit of $2 million per occurrence, there are annual aggregate limits, or limits on the total amount of coverage for the year regardless of the number of claims. A $3 million annual aggregate applies for the following: • Products. • Failure to supply utilities (water, electricity, gas, steam service, and phone and internet or other electronic data transmission services.) See section II1.13, Data . Data security breaches (a $250,000 sublimit, which is part of and not in security breach and computer-related risks.pp addition to the $3 million aggregate, a lies for Payment Card Industry Ym Y fines and penalties and data security breach regulatory fines and penalties resulting from a data security breach claim.) • Electromagnetic fields. • Limited contamination (sudden and accidental release of pollutants; herbicide and pesticide applications; sewer ruptures, overflows, and backups; lead and asbestos claims; mold claims; organic pathogen claims; hostile fire claims; and excavation and dredging claims, which are also subject to an annual $250,000 sublimit.) See section IILJ, Land use A $1 million annual aggregate applies to land use and special risk litigation. and special risk litigation. This coverage is provided on a sliding scale percentage basis, which is based on participation in LMCIT's land use incentive. See section II1.1), A $100,000 annual aggregate applies for employees' activities in outside Employees' activities in outside organizations. organizations. 2. Statutory liability limits Minn. stat. § 466.04. The statutory municipal tort cap is limited to a maximum of $500,000 per claimant and $1.5 million per occurrence. These limits apply whether the claim is against the city, against the individual officer or employee, or against both. The LMCIT liability coverage provides a standard limit of $2 million per occurrence. See summary ofLMCIT At the city's coverage renewal each year, it must decide whether to waive or Liability Coverage Options and the effects of choosing not waive the statutory limits. There is no right or wrong answer, and it's a the various coverage discretionary decision each governing body must make. structure options. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 5 RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 6 a. Waiving the statutory limit Members who waive the statutory limits are waiving the protection of the statutory limits, up to the amount of coverage the city has. A claimant could recover up to the LMCIT standard limit of $2 million, rather than the statutory limit of $500,000 per claimant. Because the waiver increases the exposure, the premium is a bit higher for coverage under the waiver option. A city may choose to pay more in premium for the waiver option because the statutory liability limit only applies in cases where the city is in fact liable and the injured party's actual proven damages are greater than the statutory limit. Some cities may want to have more assets available to compensate their citizens for injuries caused by the city's negligence. See section H.D.3, In those cases where the city waives the statutory limit, but also purchases the Purchasing higher liability limits. LMCIT excess liability coverage, a claimant could potentially recover more. If, for example, the city has $1 million of excess coverage and chooses to waive the statutory tort caps, the claimant or claimants could recover up to $3 million in damages in a single occurrence. The cost of the excess liability coverage is higher if the city waives the statutory tort caps. The cost difference is proportionally greater than the cost difference at the primary level because for a city that carries excess coverage, waiving the statutory tort caps increases both the per claimant exposure and the per occurrence exposure. b. Not waiving the statutory limit For cities who choose not to waive the statutory limits, the city's liability is limited by the statute to no more than $500,000 per claimant and $1.5 million See section H.D.3.a, Statutory limits may not per occurrence. LMCIT's higher coverage limits would only come into play apply. on those types of claims that aren't covered by the statutory limit. 3. Purchasing higher liability limits LMCIT makes available the option of carrying higher coverage limits than the basic limit of $2 million per occurrence. The LMCIT excess liability coverage is available in $1 million increments up to a maximum of $5 million. There are several reasons why cities may consider carrying LMCIT's excess liability coverage. a. Statutory limits may not apply Minn. stat. § 3.736. The statutory tort caps do not or may not apply for the following types of claims: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 6 RELEVANT LINKS: 42 U.S. Code § 1983. • Claims under federal civil rights laws, including Section 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Claims for tort liability the city has assumed by contract, which occurs when a city agrees in contract to defend and indemnify a private party. • Claims for actions in another state, which may occur in border cities that have mutual aid agreements with adjoining states or when a city official attends a national conference. 42 U.S. Code § 1983. • Claims based on liquor sales, which mostly affects cities with municipal liquor stores, but it could also relate to beer sales at a fire relief association fundraiser, for example. • Claims based on a "taking" theory, which are suits challenging land use regulations frequently include an "inverse condemnation" claim, alleging the regulation amounts to a "taking" of the property. b. Annual limits apply in LWIT's coverage for specific risks See Section H.D, Coverage Besides LMCIT's overall coverage limit of $2 million per occurrence, there limits. are annual aggregate limits for certain risks. If the city has a loss or claim in one of these areas, there might not be enough limits remaining to cover the city's full exposure if there is another similar loss during the year. There are, however, a couple important restrictions on how the excess coverage applies to risks that are subject to aggregate limits. The excess coverage does not apply to the following: • Failure to supply utilities. • Mold. • Lead and asbestos. • Excavation and dredging. • Sudden and accidental release of pollutants below ground or within or on the surface of any body of water. • Auto no-fault claims. • Uninsured/underinsured motorist claims. • Workers' compensation, disability, or unemployment claims. • Claims under the medical payments coverage. • Claims arising from the activities of outside organizations. • No-fault sewer backup. • Liquor liability, unless the city has specifically requested it. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/15/2018 LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 7 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regards to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the choices available are as follows: to not waive the statutory tort limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, and to waive the limit and to add insurance to a new level. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held November 25, 2019. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 0 LAGUE LMCMINNESOTA CITIES LIABILITY COVERAGE — WAIVER FORM Members who obtain liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the member's effective date of coverage. Return completed form to your underwriter or email to pstech(&lmc.org. The decision to waive or not waive the statutory tort limits must be made annually by the member's governing body, in consultation with its attorney if necessary. Members who obtain liability coverage from LMCIT must decide whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision has the following effects: • If the member does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant could recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether the member purchases the optional LMCIT excess liability coverage. If the member waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could recover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence (under the waive option, the tort cap liability limits are only waived to the extent of the member's liability coverage limits, and the LMCIT per occurrence limit is $2,000,000). The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. • If the member waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 145 University Avenue West PH: (651) 281-1200 FX: (651) 281-1298 INSURANCE TRUST St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 TF: (800) 925-1122 www.Imc.org LMCIT Member Name: City of Orono Check one: ❑1 The member DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04. FIThe member WAIVES the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of member's governing body meeting: November 25, 2019 Signature: Position: Acting Mayor o: AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 8 Item Description: Disposal of Bicycles Date: November 25, 2019 Presenter: Correy Farniok Agenda Consent Agenda Police Chief Section: Purpose. The Orono Police Department has 9 bicycles that have been turned in to the department. The bikes were found or abandoned within the city. The following bicycles have not been claimed. All of the bicycles and have been in the department's possession for more than 60 days. The police department considers the bicycles as abandoned property and would like to dispose of them by donating to Free Bikes for Kids for repair and distribution back to children and young adults. The bicycles that cannot be fixed/used will be destroyed by Orono Public Works. 19-8319 Green womans mtn. bike 19-7377 boys mtn. bike 19-8319 kids BMX bike 19-8453 kids BMX bike and red mtn. bike 19-8615 kids silver scooter and blue kids bike 19-8812 womans mtn. bike 19-8719 womans mtn. bike 19-8074 womans mtn. bike 19-6983 pull behind bike, childs trailer Staff Recommendation. Recommend a motion to approve the donation of bicycles to Free Bikes for Kids to be repaired and distributed to children and young adults and those that cannot be repaired will be destroyed by Orono Public Works. Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: Correy Farniok Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 9 Date: November 25, 2019 Item Description: 2020 Public Works Plan Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to gain Council approval for the 2020 Public Works Plan. 2. Background. The 2020 Public Works Plan is an effort to improve the planning and budgeting of Public Works and Engineering activities for the City of Orono. The intent of the plan is to: a. Provide an increased level of detail and refinement on those items from the Capital Improvement plan (CIP) that are scheduled for the upcoming calendar and fiscal year. b. Improve the coordination/timing of projects. c. Provide City Council a comprehensive list of work for approval early in the year in conjunction with the CIP and Budget approvals. d. Ensure that the Public Works and Engineering Department's priorities and work items are meeting Council intent and direction and aligned with City goals. e. Identify items for planning and engineering the year prior to their execution. 3. 2020 Public Works Plan. The 2020 Public Works plan is attached as Exhibit A. Upon approval, the public works and engineering staff will begin executing the plan. Many of the projects will require further Council action for design approvals and/or award of contracts. 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend Approval of the 2020 Public Works Plan. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approval the attached 2020 Public Works Plan. Exhibits A. 2019 Public Works Plan Prepared By: Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -Tga 2020 Public Works Plan The 2020 Public Work Plan describes the planned activities of the Public Works and Engineering Department broken down by functional area. The list includes capital investment items and the larger maintenance and operations projects. Once approved by the City Council it will be the guiding work document for the Department's activities in 2020. Table of Contents Public Works Overview 2 Public Works 2020 Plan by Function 3 Streets 3 Sewer 4 Water 4 Storm Water 5 Parks 5 Equipment & Facilities 6 Maintenance District Map 7 Project Map 8 References: City Council Mission, Vision and Goals Park Commission 2019 Goals/Priorities 2018-2040 Community Management Plan 2020 Draft Capital Investment Plan, 2020 Draft Budget Water System Plan, 2013 Well Head Protection Plan, 2013 Pavement Management Plan, 2014 Sign Retro -reflectivity Policy, 2015 Traffic Management Policy, 2015 Orono Standard Plates, 2018 Orono Snow and Ice Policy, 2018 Surface Water Management Plan, 2018 Orono MS4 Program/Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, 2015 Public Works and Engineering Department Overview Vision: Making people's lives better through the services we provide each day. Mission: Orono Public Works enhances the safety, welfare and livability of the community by providing and managing infrastructure and services for Water, Sewer, Facilities, Streets and Parks. Goals: • Proactively maintain the City's infrastructure thru established and aggressive preventative maintenance programs • Develop, support and retain a qualified, motivated and well-trained work force • Provide a responsive, respectful, customer service oriented focus in all we do • Ensure construction and maintenance activities are conducted to standard in a fiscally and environmentally responsible way • Identify and champion sustainable funding for Public Works services Organization: Public Works Director: Adam Edwards, P.E. Streets and Storm Sewer Utilities Parks & Golf Course Engineering Supervisor: David (DJ) Supervisor: Scott Supervisor: Jason Goehring City Engineer: Adam Edwards, P.E. Goman Oberai er • Equipment Maintenance • Sanitary sewer system • Parks • Design, management and • Municipal Street Signage • Lift stations • Playgrounds construction of the cities infrastructure • Residential Street Lights • Water production & • Beaches • Implements the SWPPP, NPDES, • Snow Plowing distribution • City docks Well Head Protection, and Pavement • Street Repairs • Fire hydrants • City grounds Management plans. • Roadside Tree Trimming • Meter reading • Ice rinks • Reviews Construction and Zoning • Sidewalks • Water meters • Trails permit applications (Grading and • Drainage • Water Quality Report • Manage and maintain a 9 hole Erosion) • Storm Water System • Underground utility municipal Golf Course • Support PB&Z property complaints • Street Sweeping locates 6 Maintenance Workers Clubhouse Manger (Seasonal) Engineering Consulting Firm: 3 Maintenance Worker (Seasonal) Park Maintenance Workers Bolton and Menk, Inc (Seasonal) Dave Martini, P.E. Clubhouse Attendants (Seasonal) Streets ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-001 2020 Streets This project includes the reconstruction, reclamation or Mill and overlay of the following streets: Smith& $ 1,353,140 Pavement Lyman Avenues, Livingston & Navarre Avenues, Windjammer Lane, Rest Point Lane, and Togo Road. Stormwater Funding dependent Briar Street and the eastern end of Fox Street will also be completed. Design work is Water also underway for Casco Circle, Dickinson & Russel Streets although these streets have been differed to Sewer Funds 2021 construction. Projects also include storm water improvements, water system rehabilitation and sanitary sewer Rehabilitation. 20-002 2019-2020 Snow and Ice Annual snow and ice removal. Performed in accordance with the Snow and Ice Policy. $ 120,000 Streets Operating Budget removal / treat 20-003 2020 Preventive Street Select streets shall have their cracks routed, cleaned and sealed. Spot sealing will be required on areas with $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Streets Operating Budget Maintenance a concentration of small cracks. 20-004 Annual Sign Inspection This activity includes the inspection all of the street signs in maintenance area 2. Damaged and failing signs $ 17,400 Streets Operating Budget and Maintenance will be replaced in accordance the Traffic management policy and the Sigh Retro -reflectivity Policy. 20-005 Annual Right of Way Tree Annual tree trimming and stump removals within the rights of way. 2020 focus will be for rights of way $ 20,000 Streets Operating Budget Trimming within Maintenance District 2. 20-006 Spring Street Sweeping Spring Street Sweeping $ 13,000 Streets Operating Budget 20-007 Fall Street Sweeping Fall Street Sweeping $ 13,000 Streets Operating Budget 20-008 Annual Road Patching Reactive Street maintenance including in house and contracted patching, shoulder repairs and pothole $ 50,000 Streets Operating Budget and Shoulder filling Maintenance 20-009 2020 ROW Mowing Mowing of select potions of the ROW. $ 10,000 Streets Operating Budget 20-010 Annual Light Pole Light pole decorations -Holiday lights, banners and flags $ 2,000 Streets Operating Budget Decorations 20-011 Right of Way Tree This project will be a continuation of last year's parks tree inventory. The project will consist of the $ 5,000 Streets Operating Budget Inventory inventorying of trees within city Right of Ways. The purpose is to establish the species mix and overall health of the city's public tree canopy. The results will be used to conduct further planning to address issues such and Emerald Ash Bore and Dutch Elm disease. The project will be dependent upon a Tree Grant from Hennepin County. 20-012 Street Inspections This project includes the inspection of all the public streets scheduled for work in 2021 and 22 as well as $ 5,000 Streets Operating Budget those in Maintenance District 2. 19-046 M&O Brackets Point A mill and overlay of the public portion of the roadway between CSAH 15 and the new Development $ 26,975 Permit Funding Pavement. Timing is tied to Southways Development wear course. Which was delayed pending 1400's hauling completion. 18-043 CSAH 112 PH2 The cooperative agreement for the CSAH 112 Phase 2 project assigns Orono the task of managing the $ 70,000 CSAH 112 Turnback Funds Landscaping landscaping project. Project was scheduled for 2019 but road construction delays followed by high bids have pushed the project into 2020. Sanitary Sewer ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-013 Lift Stations This project will rehabilitate 3 of the City's 45 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation includes the inspection, and $ 8,000 $ 140,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Rehabilitations replacement of a lift stations piping, motors, pumps and control as well as repairs wet well. The Lift 20-021 Water valve exercising Stations identified for 2020 are Grinder Station #10, Lift Station #19 and Lift Station #30. Rehabilitating 2 $ 5,000 $ 28,000 Water Operating Budget and inspection and lift stations per year is part of the city's preventative maintenance plan. Allows City to provide extensive replacement. maintenance to each Lift Station once every 25 years. 20-014 Sanitary Sewer This Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) lining of infiltration $ 290,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Rehabilitation (CIPP and susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement. The purpose of the project Manhole Sealing) is to reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Sanitary sewer systems and extend the life to the existing pipes. The lining process creates and new durable pipe within the older pipe at a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling in order to replace the older pipe. 20-015 Annual Sewer Main This project includes the cleaning of 1/5 of the City's sewer mains. This project is part of the City $ 14,000 Sanitary Operating Budget Flushing preventative maintenance program. 2019's focus will be in maintenance area 2. 20-016 Annual Sewer Main This project includes the cleaning and inspection of 1/5 of the City's sewer mains. This project is part of the $ 50,000 Sanitary Operating Budget Televising and Inspection City preventative maintenance program. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs. 2020's focus will be in maintenance area 2. 20-017 Annual Lift Station Annual Inspection of all lift stations. These preventive maintenance inspections to determine maintenance $ 8,500 Sanitary Operating Budget Inspections needs. 20-018 Annual Generator Annual inspection and routine maintenance for the City's generator fleet. $ 27,000 Sanitary Operating Budget Inspections and Maintenance 20-019 2020 Back Up Generator This project will provide a backup generator for Lift Station #3 (East Lake Street) which services the sanitary $ 150,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Installations sewer system east and North of Stubbs Bay and for Lift Station #13 (Casco Point) which services the sanitary sewer in the south end of the peninsula. Water ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-020 Annual Hydrant Flushing This project includes the annual flushing of the city water mains, testing and inspection of hydrants. $ 8,000 Water Operating Budget and Maintenance 20-021 Water valve exercising Exercise and inspect all of the water valves. Replace any defective valves $ 5,000 $ 28,000 Water Operating Budget and inspection and replacement. Stormwater ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-022 Annual Storm Water This project includes miscellaneous storm water repairs and improvements include culvert replacements, $ 5,000 $ 100,000 Stormwater Fund Improvement Project curb and gutter Improvements and drainage way improvements; small but critical storm water issues. 20-023 Annual Storm Water Each year the City inspects and cleans 1/5 of the storm sewer system. The focus area for 2020 is District 2. $ 10,000 Stormwater Fund 20-026 Inspections and The inspections then drive future repair activities for the city. $ 5,000 Park Operating Budget Maintenance use. Includes removal of Docks, Swim buoys, debris cleanup, opening of winter lake access points, closing 20-024 Spring Thaw The project consists of all of the annual maintenance items that occur each spring. $ 12,000 Stormwater Operating 20-027 Annual Park Inspections Inspect all parks and lake access points. This annual inspection process ensures playground and park safety. $ 5,000 Budget Parks ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-025 Spring Parks Transition This project includes all of the activities required each spring to transition our parks from winter to summer $ 5,000 Park Operating Budget Activities use. Includes installation of Docks, Swim buoys, debris cleanup, opening of summer lake access points, closing of winter access points. 20-026 Fall Parks Transition This project includes all of the activities required each fall to transition our parks from summer to winter $ 5,000 Park Operating Budget Activities use. Includes removal of Docks, Swim buoys, debris cleanup, opening of winter lake access points, closing of summer access points. 20-027 Annual Park Inspections Inspect all parks and lake access points. This annual inspection process ensures playground and park safety. $ 5,000 Park Operating Budget and Maintenance Inspection results are used to plan future maintenance activity. 20-028 Summit Beach This project consists of paving the parking Lot and adding a playground. In addition signage, beach, picnic $ 95,300 Park Fund Improvements tables and other amenities will be replaced or refreshed. Grant 20-029 East Long Lake Road To This project includes the conversion of the northern end of Eat Long Lake Road to a multimodal trail. The $ 261,000 Park Fund Trail Project project also will include stormwater and lakeshore improvements. This project received a Grant for $120K from the DNR. 20-030 Dakota Trail connection. This project includes a trail connection along CSAH 19 from Livingston to the Dakota Trail. The project is a $ 160,000 Park Fund three way partnership between the City, Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District. Three Rivers has Grant the design and project lead. 19-033 Big Island ADA Trails This project includes converting select trails at Big Island to be ADA compliant. This project is dependent 6 $ 400,000.00 Park Fund upon receiving a grant for cover 1/2 of the cost. Grant Equipment and Facilities ID Description Notes Operating Capital Funding Sources Budget Improvement Plan Budget 20-031 2020 Equipment Procurement of: $ 293,600 Improvement/ Equipment replacements A new engine for Truck 431, Outlay Fund An anti -icing tank and pump for Truck 425, Televising and GIS equipment of the Sewer, Water and Stormwater Departments, A replacement for the right of way mower, A replacement for Golf Course Aerator 611 New mower for the Parks Department. 20-032 PW Cold Storage This project will provide a cold storage facility for the storage of Public Works materials. $ 30,000 Improvement/ Equipment Outlay Fund 19-039 Emergency Generator for Replacement of the emergency backup generator. The existing generator is undersized. The new $ 175,000 Improvement/ Equipment PD and City Hall generator will be sized to support the City EOC, Police Department, City Hall and Public Works Facility Outlay Fund 2020 Public Works Projects Ferndale Road N Ke M&© (MSA) wlEmeienc Plymouth far CiryL Hall and PD iaa d i _' a ' ; -ti East Lon Lake epasS M g - u Trail Cnng Lake aKe Summit Beach LONG.! �>I LAK- E Park Improvements Lift Station Rehab LS 30 Backup + i E9 M �_ Smith and Lyman _ i 1 _ e ° Y wartATA Reclaim Generator LS 3 a masse a ���� ■ r — — — — — »� _ , Lift Station'• , � .. �� - c �" �-� � Fox Street Fav Rehab LS 19 Construction !�� l r yP, l Bri=Street M&© � '5 r LJ*@ Bay jUmd aFInnel' l R d uBaY w ~ M&O IPJ ♦ e I S t aka R ,I r,� ' ►»� rT * % Lift StationReha6 GS 10 Rest point Lane w M&C, '-r wes. �; Crgy �21nr' §''�.�•yL ff' L I Livingston and. _! I A Navarre Ave Q �w 5x SMM MIN NfrC N {A ACvi Reclaim BE �� � Livingston and ~�°"""`"•� ,� � '' � � ■ Navarre Ave Reclaim r SPRINGS G Lafayeae v �= 2 Water Main vARK t T gar Bi Island ADA Replacement wl ' - j+l e g HC Project g31„ - f y� BIG ao nr Trails and Force maul R .L; ^ �° y ISLAND craarm g Improvements Replacement ra NKA T z sprang Darr Back Up ith HC project_gay BAN crown a Stn �.�.�� Dau�d Generator LS 13 Streets Stormwater Sanitary Wa#er Parks ` Funding Dependent