HomeMy WebLinkAboutW19-18 TEP FindingsMinnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Technical Evaluation Panel Findings Report
Date(s) of Site
Visit/Meeting:
County:
Project Name:
September 4, 2019
Hennepin
W19-18 2740 White Oak Circle
Location of Project: 2740 White Oak Circle, Orono
(attach map if possible)
TEP ATTENDEES:
LGU: Erin Manlick, MCWD
SWCD: Stacey Lijewski
BWSR: Ben Carlson
DNR: N/A
LGU: MCWD
LGU Contact: Erin Manlick
Phone #: 952-641-4586
Email EManlick@minnehahacreek.org
Address:
OTHER ATTENDEES:
Mark Kjolhaug - Kjolhaug
Environmental
Tim Johnson - Livit Site + Structure
Karen Berrell - Property Owner
OTHER ATTENDEES:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING:
The Applicant submitted a boundary and type application dated August 13, 2019 for the above referenced property.
The TEP met on-site to review two wetland boundaries in the field as well as discuss a proposed landscaping plan to
prevent flooding on the property.
TYPE OF MEETING: check all applicable
❑ Office ® On -Site ❑ Phone Conference ❑ E -Mail ❑ Other:
TEP FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS':
The TEP found that the two wetlands identified in the delineation report met criteria for wetland characteristics and
both boundaries located were confirmed. It was agreed upon that Wetland 1 may have encroached westward in recent
years and that a no -loss status might be claimed by the property owner as a result of incidental wetland. The TEP
agreed that supporting materials, including historical aerial imagery and evidence of altered drainage upstream, would
be needed to prove an incidental wetland. Next steps to be taken by the property owner and/or their representatives
are to modify the existing, or submit a new, WCA application requesting a no -loss determination for incidental status of
Wetland 1.
SIGNATURES
SWCD Representative
Do not concur
Date BWSR Representative
❑ Do not concur
9/10/19
Date
i TEP Findings should be a meaningful concise summary detailing the project conditions, technical data, and what rules apply.
The TEP recommendation should be clear,based on rule and best professional judgement.
Rev. 12/17/2013
LGU Representative Date DNR Representative Date
Do not concur ❑ Do not concur ❑
1 TEP Findings should be a meaningful concise summary detailing the project conditions, technical data, and what rules apply.
The TEP recommendation should be clear,based on rule and best professional judgement.
Rev. 12/17/2013