Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 7060
• II II 111111 I 11 11 11 Doc No A10738925 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Dec 20, 2019 1:53 PM Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, County Recorder Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 133 Pkg ID 1923343E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. BOAT CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ti� �� NO. 7060 G t4&Es t_i A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA19-000090 WHEREAS, on October 10, 2019, Brent Teele ("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 577 Park Lane and legally described as: Lot 12, Block 6, Minnetonka Summit Park (hereinafter the"Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for an average lakeshore setback variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow the creation of the second story 3 season porch; and WHEREAS, on November 18,2019, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2019, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA19-000090. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.21 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 50 feet. 1 �O.Aip CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �� ,� NO. 7060 _ G t.kESHO- 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. To allow a 3 season porch over an existing second story deck forward of the average lakeshore setback 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance The proposed location of the home additions do not block lake views of the adjacent property owners, and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The average lakeshore setback variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The variance requests are residential in nature and are reasonable considering the unique nature of the property as a large peninsula on the lake. The relatively large flood hazard area and existing improvements on the property creates difficulties in locating a conforming structure. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; ; The location of the structures on the property and configuration of the lot were not created by the property owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The visual impacts resulting from the additions proposed within the average lakeshore setback will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Rather, the home will not impact views from the lake nor will it appear to be more visually obtrusive than the existing buildings on the property. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as 2 -8-,v0.Aip CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y� � NO. 1 0 6 0 G l�1 ESHOO" defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an allowed conditional use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing home footprint is not set to change. The applicant I looking to include the 2nd story of the home over an existing main level. The home currently sits within the setback and the addition is not going to change the setback from the lake. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The proposed addition will not change the current setbacks from the lake or property lines. The location of the existing home is unique. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home can be re-built in kind, the proposed addition is necessary to permit the property owners continued enjoyment of their property. The addition is located in a location which serves the intent and goals of the ordinance by minimizing visual impacts to the lake. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The proposed project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting of the variance will resolve and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-171279 to allow for structure in the average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated September 3, 2019 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3 ‘ ONp CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7060 G t�kESHO- 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (December 9, 2020). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this en day of , 20 II ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: OlYnk-(1,61 \ I - 410 Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 4 7060 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR \ z BRENT TEELE / \sz \._ "_F OF LOT 12, BLOCK 6, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK I / E--,2 i HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA awv $AR a \ / Lig' / Off ; , / Ensu ` / 6"gA af<om EXISTING Ch W' •• A � v HOUSE v \ pa v\\ \\ \ \ \ \ /567 e, z4,, VA \ A AA \ \ \ AV V DECK 166¢ 4 ' •� �8Jg a \\ V V \ VA \\ \ \ \ y_a' ° N X X C ^\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ YSS_--_ � 6T0ERISc) o\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ / /� \ A � •tr ' \ e- � m \ A V \ \ A A A A \ A n�q O . �\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ , yl ,n f / t.\ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ t95' °�' PROPOSED t.: /10 3 ro '2, V A QD„�� \ A EXISTING ��; „ \ \ \' I I / P6 `a” -< a�''1 / ADDITION t\ f 9 ,,,,,, ° HOUSE ...00 t\�� �') #577 ` \\ \ J �f°ie ` `\ SEl6Acx II 10 (A) aaU\\ \\ ,,....‘-'1--- \ i.(� --- - 25' e\ \ \ INmi I ,' \\ YIP \... u.,nvm t\ \ ,��w'aI arca m) / sst Nw\ Iv 1v v v too v I v1 \ 'y,�, �i 15136 v szsa coNra6 \ \ w\ \ - ) \ate\ \ -� \ LAKE M.tau, \ \ q`\ \ \\° ,e .) t.e,ar\ .a�,a, r' 1 ri'q \ wp-Vv 4 „' ' v $�\ -.,•::.:\'----_wti---- DRIVEWAY v\ St MINNETONKA A \ .,\�v vv \ /u..v �a;,,,ee v\vvVvPS.) v � \ \ Q \ i \\�i\\ suev6r�^\\ \\ \ ����gam\ \\\\\\'_�— — EXISTING � a�g o` LME •. \� \\ \ – NORTH ARM \ \ 'o\\� �_ 4 \ \\ \ ° HOUSE I EXISTING ss \ 'mwVv`�� I t 4,1\ /sea Iv GARAGE / F3° \ \ / _-\ \ \\ V \ \ \ \ \ \ _ / z \ \ I \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ % \ \ I�'I \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ / \ \ \ \ V\ \ \\ \\ \ ' \ i \ \ \ \ / \ \ • \ \ \ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES \ I Lot 12,Block 6,Minnetonka Summit Park \ I \ a denotes iron marker \ \ (909.3). denotes existing spot elevation.mean sea level datum ]y \ 1- \ --5 --: denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum 9 \ \ Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 4 a i This sus y intends to how the boundaries of the above described property,the locationo o/ n existing house,shed,garage to be removed,spot elevations,topography ell visible"hardcover',and the proposed location of aprposed addition thereon. 9 r1 It does not purport to show any other improvements o encroachments. '''iii • 95£95 NW'ONOUO .o�..._1 'OO13 1:1331,1111 NNW3NVl ONIUdS EF, - °"iNOI to SNRO 6909-99L(e9L) f 3NV1 NMI LLS 1 .., .. N?3 Q OW 3C43S V10S3NNIIN')Itltld 3)IV1 ONIUdS FZ . 'O 33N301S39 31331 = 3N 3f1N3SV ltltl1N3O 63E3 w p h emi d. �' O '3N1 S3IVIOOSSV ONINNVId 3WOH y a e- d. 2 0 Edi mF a 1'. e °oIiiIiIi 19 2S IEP IA i o F 12y1y I IIIili. 3 has 1161101161 Pi /11 Vii laggV ViVi 0 il.II , Ai--A 11°i1117%11010111111111111111, NWealli�1101i111!11111''IP All IL 010 ij / IMP III ( dr#1 010011.1041 d --.A0-• r i I se di,00 r!ti\O.,ii ullid I 1 il!l"il I't�i IH I C- 111!!it if 1/f.1,44/ t.I n� 'll. I� I'r��I 'I o y� 9 �l� ���/ Os, - — - II' I • I1hhII1F3 — o . 1 O I ',,1• 1t-: :-i' IS 1 a . I., _— 111.1.711141 II 1, . �� ',��1��j1 � N 1 , 411111,4111F-, � i II ibliiikillii Pi ,I �i'l iv eif dak► � '11II, II 110141111 ��11,11 01,1„ I I ilii/V = ,�'� /;Arm" 1 �!�� �� o 1 ovy a:F.., 1 Ily A .4 --,._ iv, ,,11 ii/ i=p , -> — 1 iii BIE0r4Leir 1 110 ;.-.--11'070ivilr'''' A/ o adi6it ill‘ _ 9 �z-z s cen Z i ?_ 11 $g§ 1111/11q 1.0018 0 Bli gar thi tis€ € a CP, � a JESSE e rr HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. " C .,o.". rp i 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE ,_[ _....o.!.�rm TEEIE RESIDENCE E ,„1,= SPRING LAKE PARK,MINNESOTA 55432 M d D E R N"�`®�"�"��,.'�..�,a.""�" 577 PARK LANE 02:1N 3 (763)786-6069 MN 55356 CO NBTRU DTIDNr+eer+"co".+.cc.�o"M". " ORONO, v a SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. -c'"'""c"+' O T i Al, 4c inic 3F o 0 yIo__ 1 a +� �� Orr riA„,S A 11111 ly_ 12 1 F. k-‘-‘' i ZIII SII II I l • )\ .—.441\k 11 6.1L14 I - -_ .�.._� • art 6Pi WIiIIzp9V zg Fg ani's- = o0 ii �^i yOXN- 'i m ��� 99� 9 m r Ali sk i of,-aim Oi 3 In g fd i c71. .1 6 o lig pB x , . i 11 i c:) 0 ° T HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. ”. z ��y 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE pic ����:.:�+ TEELE RESIDENCE Sp m 75 c SPRING LAKE PARK,MINNESOTA 55432 e:.®..ee=..=o...,,,.-�e.n 577 PARK LANE two n `�m (783)788-8069 MODERN. ' MN 55356 GOORONO, S'', SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. _.,,,-.,....•^ N ...•.L18N OO 'OO18 tl38Wfll)WVd 3)IV1 ONIHdS w x 9SfSS NW'ONONO •�� 6808-98L(E9L) 3= E z� N213DCt 3N1/1 MNtld LLS 2E6SS tl10S3NNIW')INtld 3)1V1 ONItldS z 7 w 33N3O153N 37331 0 3N 3fN3AV 1VN1N3O 62E8 `w 2,;,) $o, • -ON1 S3IVIOOSSV ONINNV1d 3INOH « o 0 — Q 1 So P•••-• II 1 rii b it 3 II e?i.' Ifilili N O 3 wFoc ®®®�wa3 2 2 s' z 4 F W, �SF9 i�J .7p.7pi C -fd%¢¢ 613111' .m N 20�a gl Haas O O Z OnaG MOH y Z O N6SJ GL W.3 z OGU3- 1101/111 Q30 S. g§! 11a •it>( 0 t _ A z1. j ti 44 �' j_, 0k---- X53.55-n1U ,it S -0 d- 48. u 5 3 f a $ Trc fes a I•�" b 1i i 'S 9• -t Sii� ';'I3' ' ,'-1 \a ,P.I a 1 � d E S % 1 N t 's , s ) i - -Volirffe. ; uir „,,,, ,, A, % ,_ .„,e, ,,, ; E N. ro, As/01 K I 01441 ) N t '1in T- t-��q'�i Z'-4" Aos s .- 'A 0 6 7 C S sa �� i i -A� o 5 ,_ 3a 3 1111111111 111$11 3€ I tip ii qii MEI a `11 I p I CC ° T HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. • 124 N m 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE ,. TEELE RESIDENCE .c 4 RSPRING LAKE PARK,MINNESOTA 55432 A•-Ay=p D �.N 577 PARK IANE e LT, mi (763(788-6069 C©NSTRUCTION .. ORONO,MN 55356 s a SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. 0••....”0*• 5