Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-18-2019 Planning Commission Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE I l i I S I I9 ❑ COUNCIL 0 PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. ,- ` "�`' h R(v`u'v' GI\e_i,tv 1 2. . -Thl-eqe =Kel sexq/cdf Loi)i;c 6 ` z;/-.,.II 1P-___5"' 3. 5--'(o 14 kiwi hi- II 4. . e � 4 -1-Oki ! r (VG" &01-1 7 7Z' ,t1T l al./4 r� 5. C&,,,,:-._,T4, 5 y 0 ,v AA...... 1.. .,....„...A...... 6.e)rLs Div"ie coi 7C a4k-rie Al # 7.hall'e 'friAlc. Ad'zitvi ; e(60 3: r4 1--,1 1 4 ,,,r .../ „0. 1-p - �(.s,ma 9IU� 8. Lr 6 t 5 S '�v`'��,�'� l' 9. u,s;k4 &i 1-1la:+ 1 i L ( 1-1,myc.. .1/) ' f / 11,E 111 ( i,/,4/'/z' / 17 f' //( �(7/W /I' ;�C v b 12. PvicA, 6,l�J' (L i'ili r,2 ta,i it./ci ''f- 1 ( 13. - C� -7C° -c. 1 14. ,c/k4C- eger -c c) , 4 / 15. .,_. R ( ct c\ 13 c71-11 c-r ,,,, 7 c'Y r) .45,,cif V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE 0 COUNCIL O PLANNING COMMISSION O OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. •• - ..,,,,:.d•t„ ,,• ...-.... - . ,r.: ...,..: , raeiii. -.:',°).3f- 2:7;%:.,-*6.,‘,,.4.1t'llifitc -i*:,ti'drE/71E-7frHttYP.M:1-ar':-.,'''''':K*:,:',1' 47'47:' :''' '''''''''`':,' ''',:,'•, :4;...."'-,tr".'::1-..: PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. 7/4,)///''s ., 2. 4/:/y...A/7.) V \J---ezif--/e--- ( geY/37 tt V , -7 -1-, ) I -7 ---.. 7 / / 7 ' ---7 ---4( 7 3. ) ,772 ( 7.? /1;."" / 4 ,,,1 t t v • '1/4- • ' __ i 4. ( ) (-- ( rci:.A ,3 ci 1 ).- 4,, . Pi P7/ 5. c i v---1-1 ,i, Mc 1 i' c7,L. Ik-itis(/ L r-ft, 41-1)--&- 1-116 IG/rte,.4 LTh2( 1 • ' --, i 6. 1 1 11 ; - - V 1 i ,; - '- i , ' ,--,--e.----z. 1 1 t, . ... v ( J 71 ' 7. /71 . / (' -4 z) , 44 1 4,4,,,,L)a I 1 --7--- - /- 8. , , "LA L (..'1/ '15 i i ? S c (-5,6,4 (--L. ? ‘ ,---7 .--, 7-----) , 9. 10. --)'"`t- [741--- --Le-- v-- 1 3` P-e A 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V VLEGAL FORMSNFORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE DOC Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, November 18, 2019, 6:30 P.M. G` Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono,MN 55356 4k sH00' 952-249-4600 /www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet— located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Richard F. Crosby II Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes October 21, 2019 New Business 1. LA19-000041 Lakewest Development, 3570 Ivy Place, Subdivision to Replat Lot 1 and Outlot A of Ivy Place (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 2. LA18-000094 Lakewest Development, 3570 Ivy Place, Conditional Use Permit for a permanent Dock (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 3. LA19-000085 Chris & Amy Evenson, 780 Lakeview Parkway, Conservation Easement Amendment/Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 4. LA19-000086 J. Marie Fieger, 580 Big Island, Permit for Dock on Right-of-Way (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA19-000087 Melissa Musgjerd, 4156 Highwood Road, Right-of-Way Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. LA19-000089 Charlene Bystrom, 275 Crestview Avenue,Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 7. LA19-000090 Brent Teele, 577 Park Lane,Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 8. LA19-000093 Alexander Design Group, 1971 Fagerness Point Road,Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 9. LA19-000094 David Burda, 1966 Shadywood Road,Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 10. LA19-000095 John Quinlivan, 2927 Casco Point Road,Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 11. LA19-000096 Drew Hueler, 1398 Rest Point Road, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 12. LA19-000084 Julie Thometz,1340 Baldur Park Road&PINs 08-117-23-31-0006,08-117-23-31-0007, 08-117-23-31-0008, 08-117-23-31-0009, 08-117-23-31-0010, 08-117-23-31-0011, 08-117-23-31-0012, 08-117-23-31-0013, 08-117-23-21-0014, 08-117-23-31-0016, 08-117-23-31-0017, 08-117-23-31-0018, Sketch Plan (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification -‘),OAT� Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, November 18, 2019, 6:30 P.M. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 4kEsxo44' 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us 13. Planning Commission Liaison for 2020 14. Update on November 12, 2019 City Council meeting Time Change for Planning Commission meetings Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to Monday, December 9, 2019 City Council meeting: Bob Erickson Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Date Application Received: May 22,2019 Date Application Considered as Complete:November 12,2019 120-Day Review Period Expires: March 11,2020 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members `‘e c~ Dustin Rief, City Administrator , EsHo4� From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: November 18, 2019 Subject: #LA19-000041, Steve Eggert, o/b/o Lake West Development, LLC, 3570 Ivy Place,Subdivision resulting in a plat Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting to replat the existing Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, both of Ivy Place into one buildable lot. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the Plat, subject to the provision of an easement for access and utilities to 3600 Ivy Place. The applicant, on behalf of the owner of 3570 Ivy Place, proposes plat approval,creating a new Ivy Place second addition. This plat will incorporate Outlot A and Lot 1, Block 1, both of Ivy Place into one buildable lot. This configuration will establish lake frontage on two sides for 3570 Ivy Place. Access for 3600 Ivy Place will be maintained via an easement. Background The City Council granted a variance earlier this year(Case#LA19-000028)that allowed for the replatting of the subject parcels, removing the access outlot A as required by Ordinance. Analysis Given the approved variance, and the provision of an easement to preserve and protect access, staff has no issues with the proposal. The now larger Lot 1, Block 1 will not create any non- conformities. The revised configuration of the lot will not impact the character of the neighborhood. The platting action will not impact existing easements within the subject area. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission have any concerns with the proposed plat? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval, subject to the provisions of an easement maintain access to lot 2, Block 1, Ivy Place recording of an easement for access and utilities. FILE#19-41 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 2 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Ivy Place second addition preliminary plat Exhibit D. Ivy Place Final Plat Exhibit E. Public Notice Information Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 05/22/2019 Address: 3570 IVY PL WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723420037 Land Use Number: LA19-000041 Application Submitted Agent on behalf of property owner By: Owner: Name: RUSSELL KOCON Address: JACQUELINE GIBNEY 3570 IVY PL ORONO, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Steven Eggert Company: Lake West Development Address: 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 SteveEggert@lwestdev.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: RUSSELL KOCON Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Ivy Place Re-Plat Land Use Application Amendmend Application O Type: Appeal of Admin Decision O Concept Application O Conditional Use Permit O Site Plan Application O Subdivision Application C:3 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 I Applicant Signature: C LAKE MI DEVELOPMENT. LLC September 19, 2019 Jeremy Barnhart Community Development Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 5523 RE: Ivy Place Permanent Dock Narrative Mr. Barnhart, Lake West Development on behalf of Rusty Kocon would like to formerly request a Replat of Outlot A and 3750 Ivy Place. In 2017,the developer filed a subdivision application submitting a plat showing a front lot/back lot configuration with an Outlot to provide access across Lot 1 to the back lot (Lot 2, Block 1, 3600 Ivy Place). Outlot A is owned by the original developer and Lot 1 is owned by Rusty Kocon and Jacqueline Gibney. The 2017 subdivision showed a dock towards the west lagoon area. Docks are permitted to property owners along their lake frontage connecting to the principal building located on the property. The Outlot prevented a dock to be installed on the lagoon side and a variance application was submitted and approved by the planning commission on May 20, 2019. The planning commission and City Staff decided the best approach would be to approve a variance, replat the property as one parcel, and apply for a conditional use permit for the dock to be approved. This application (LA19- 000041) is applied for concurrent with the CUP (LA19-000094). If there is any additional information I can provide, please advise. Sincerely, W'e Steven Eggert Planner 952-653-1346 steveeggert@lwestdev.com Lake West Development 114525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 I Phone 952-930-3000 1...NW...0...Id AN OLSE COL UP • •1• U03051 IllaSSI1N 4 k 1.'40 1 1:1 - Lil •5„ ,,, d g- •i—i — eoeid AAI OL9C 'i`or2 - • , Ivo y, 4 1 ; UW 10,08d I Z ? . 0 .. 1 pi I r,--A.! Li „ ili 1--1 i ; .,iifirin,0 E • .1 •Id.,P•.A,*0 1 ..1 ! al IR 0 l''''' P •A I P 7 11 ;'i; 2 .- -2 lt, ISqlOW.F8. 4 V vi'- OW iP P Og' iA i g i l' •,•' 0 al V•000•BeEsitaco••oo '7,' i i `: !. if a ry 0 n . 1 5 l'• li V5 4g 0 > . 'i i g gel r, ..-. a Z i fit kV ljt ggi a-1 1 tA i Offi ig i 1 ,! Li`i 0 111111111 i 7 PI 7 7 , A A gaE lie : U 1111111111 IL.hi-_ LU (f) LU U < _I CL > . > °6‘'.., 4- , o--,% •,... 1--1 . . H '' /,‘",.,;°:%:,,,, ,- .A. ,,' ,/ „...- , ca.. >— , , , \ c , /. s,, .. ,, r. \ u ,•„. z < . , • ,, ,- >co ;5,2.-, •:,- , \ i ;::,,z , Z ,z,,,, ,e \ - ,,,,,,,, -,„ \ - - . ,--... ' ,,,,-1,,-, t,.----\-:,..,..-•, - 11--1 0,;•,„ \\, - ' - -- 7:=........°_,,,.„ ,....:; -4:4--,:-, - -,, - ,_ 1--1 , , ,-,u• z/2:-.,. ..s_--.,==,- .--I.,,- ..'4„'... '' \ '/ ". ( LU ,, „Ot:,t;I: ,. I—I— ; .,› -- o... ,:,,y:, , ,,,,, „ •,, .,,, ,,, ,-, / ....... ro,„ ,r. , , r . , • 1 ((MON 6060)0'606 a MI40 'laid 941.0 UMONS 6e'p618OIPUI (0A001 6060)90106-LE6T'4191 109 01 0000 uo 40050013 00.01 esu000410 sselun'soup 101 BulupIpe pue t(1ppo 1.11 500j 9 04109 ((MON 6061)1 T1E6 a 4T0Z'0162 aunt uo 000005013 1.45114 (GOON 6261)696'14640 00000010 ue 60'04'0810 98 0014011 sfleP005 1.0096=0150510008 31VOS O11.0N d fl O AM 9 u0 calTsilL .I luawnu0W411s¢] 0 --- -- • • e .59544 SIL.P0910W lea luawnuol uo014s Aq you'0/1 0 �o —,.I J,— �p 00100 SS luaulnuold 0041 000501 • 9 3.00.SPs68N to 6upe09 pawni0e ue 601050'00 009309 I I so 4/T 3N e4140 lUll 4NON 041 uo paseq we s6upeae 1 If- IIS II .1.034 NI 910105 :SfHI NMOHS 321V SIN3113SV3 AJJ1LLI1 ONV 30VNPINO 09 0£ Sl 0 Sl OE •- N s> •,...',,,:f• ',Ind.() 0 Y :49 saga 510 0e01el60ll,1100005105 0001.4 'W -9000.0 Z1 le'8000 --r1.1N,` ' 40 A0PC5141 gawp 00041 paw se*Meld AM 40 1001 014110000 Soil AA=MA.041 JJ•' elosauuiw'Alun)uldauUUH'631111 if 05 00110311 .03.04'5 0003 00 5H'5 '4 5100 '9101 a''A= /o A¢p 5 L sIW panwdde 0000 sec 1510 WIN'(6960 099'8680 000005 sa001e15 e10s0uUIW of luensl0d 1-4- 5asauulW'MunoJ wdauuaN'NOISIA30?mums 010000 rill -1A. i llQI0e 105100541 Moro)uldauua0 C10100'A 840W 18500 -10.001 to 004 5141 00)00 '1010 sly 00 PO 4050P P051404 pled 00x9 anal 94!00 lope pue13100 01`11950¢050x5!5dp745Fliaa 040»0 1 \ 5osauu1W'01090)01/1004011'033501139 01015319111055916300010 0 1 ��_ ///111 �/70009 ..40, rot 111011 --(y!/ryl t V :A9 �1 :AN \�K '2u0101Np9n5'00505000'000'00511155951000001 A elos5uulW00000 PU0 SIUOJMD 'ions 10 1010„0 MOM pa9aela soy polled Hop 00 Paquxal0 ac)0o MO 045 A ane 1 400915m/40003 aql pue u0054odsu50 W 1 0003000 so evo9¢Pu 000004 pue 510000100 0045110 0141 '01401511000 41 '8100 ]511/1 40 Asp 4 q�'0510941 P104 611110004 0 6u6a 0108 1 Jo 0aualsslwwo3 0511 00 500900 9941.9 pus 0l0Id NCI ¢In SOswu!W'ou01010 100 05 03 011)all Aq 0010000 pue 000500005 seta 314110 AN!o lead 5141 C V1053NNIN'ONONO 3 :50110x3 uols5lww03 AN ..piP010191 02(r N e100auu1W'M0fO3 UI 006'Wind A0500N iii 1f'1c I 5•)1'1 01ir 01 ^ f 09150005'1 0000 Aq'8002 //a Orn.t-' ""p�/</l 000 au"000109 ppapap..worse 6500 000000501 00060004 all cal'Lill'02 0014,59 100 100 450 61036634 00016001'0110536610500314115 m1440N 5044 4045009100564503 pews,'4u0Wnl0n 50u015459 l'- 0011 4503 01un53 010000051 S9504'oN...El e00001W En'Liu'00 094,¢9 le 541 44106. 4000��11015005'l AOOL 1 ) 1 £Ztl'Liu bZ 1191,01 111 ill � l0 1050003 45,-.1141106=+ _L '8002 �)e1'0I\ 40 '- `�11 5191 pa'e0 '-66'680 M.bb,[So68Nsoil ''''-0870990 9.0054.6: uo pelage'5100 000090 000 03500 omen'110 pue:sect sNI uo pelage'pue tomes 010 meo8P0aa 014110 ales 051140 se' J' 1• !! oq a w* 0e 10511!4ea0 a0o 014110 las 04 110110 0009 0004 sel0 155 00 p511dep 51000000041 Ica 1001 11010 a E'Pg100 040 Nage'uogpee'501555 waglet05 0l 541 130 se Yptel!ao Pu0 40 00 5440 04004 900000 a 511010 s1 Wes pa10u61s e p Ja 000 0010 pee 500 1od sem 1510 Ile ley!!0000 00104 0 all 01 uo0e'i Tawe 5 " I 41 says 1505auu1W 40 01519 all ul/000050055 Pu01 0050000 Alnp a we I loll!uolsing0ns pang Au lagan 00 ate Aq pa0e0a00 sem lel0 51411041 NMOa 0901051 op uallalsuAS'00011 f alV37.411133 SOO/JANOS EZ44 v!...1 '0111'02 490051 15004-3 40P 85006 054 le 400094006 459 4 P00.01 0 10000050005 50 soomeN wounuo/l 1 T 00056 wlf55VYpO`00�1noN eWsauulb�(suJlp] IOwuaH'aIN/�',WPM 0+510N 0011 4001 040003 01000004"' G® / ' .500100.3 uolsslwwo]AW \1�1A �p� (1005��,s I� 5y,.00 0x0'5100 w("rV 151\/ .�/�Wrw�/5yJ/1 (��QJ�®� '9\ 'AueOwaa 0010 11e4ag uo Aueawm 01119011///05110011 51,s1uulW¢'JT 7uawdolanaO 1500 ay510a6¢u¢W 11010'00004 on)0e 'VOL 07 5,l 4o A¢p 1— 5141 aw 000 040/09 paBpalu11a¢sem 100w15u1 ru60106010/041 v -l5 NIAONN31-130116003'0109390144 00 01415 0a6eueW my)'00000 Nn) '9100 IJV)(. 40 004 1 1 041/000/0 000000 Se Aq paubls aq 05 51005000 mays 00504 sec,050200 011190!'Pa8w11 5asw01W 0'711'1uawd01a301saM 0801 pie 05090 55005100 05 'told SIN uo'wogs se ses00md MIIOn pue a60uWJp 19 t1Uawesee 044 000005 000 011gnd 00/00400 051105 01001000 Agway mop 000 33410 AA1 se p0515130604040110909010000044 p05057 508 0101113(0/101104 03583'1 Pole'6 W e 2'T slog 1900 0'UIdauua4 M Mono) 'etosauuIW 40 01019 051!9 P010510 4000010 P0400saP 60100119 041)0 A4000 004'M edwoo NIIINO'P011w0 elo5000114 0'3M'lUOWdO10ne0 1594 09011541 :SINIS3114 35151 AS 500511341101 MON11 X18 bgSS ON 'COQ '1'b ylgz•Q 1. y?'0 1,1 iV1d 191_01 : rld11113 010 Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/22/2019 € 273 2 ' ' 4R ! .l', 9 _.!',',,:f-i•-.7,----_-t-:- ! %. tib. „,,, ,, ,, #'`q( _r 'Y.-- �'+, _ `��: y a k '171 3700 '4'`,.`'.1:1.';. € 3 2'k� am y,= ',-..'7.-,...',,-.? -.*,, . - $ - a'�. F 3659 £ '- `l 3630 Ort} � h 3600 • 4!1 ' `. t s 5 2816 f + t 757Q a £ 020 pi,N:$s4}�a_ 3:569 \'t terns • afi930x �*L ' �xZ2949 , >`ACJ i441 m�uI. l� • 3534 F Pvr =2948 ; %.516rbr-f 4� ' 354829700 p"+' _2960 Ont .-- ." 1 3535 2990 Cl/1 t3.q ir It., 3020051 3486 +9B7 3934 5091 3026 3 3005 til g2) 3271 3466 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I i i i l i ( l l 3570 Ivy Place This data (i) s furnshed 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnishedwithnowarranty of any knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepn County shat rat be Iiadefor anydamage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGiS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE:05/22/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 31 0031 38 20-117-23 42 0019 38 20-117-23 43 0051 DAVID J PICHOTTA RAY F WILSON WILLIAM D GUST 2914 CASCO POINT RD 3534 IVY PL 3034 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID J PICHOTTA RAY F WILSON WILLIAM D GUST 2914 CASCO POINT RD 3534 IVY PL 3034 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0032 38 20-117-23 42 0022 38 20-117-23 43 0054 EMMA LOU POWELL J&S WHITE LEISEL&MARK PFLEGHAAR 2916 CASCO POINT RD 3516 IVY PL 3509 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 EMMA LOU POWELL JAMES M&SHERRY D WHITE LEISEL&MARK PFLEGHAAR 2916 CASCO PT RD 3516 IVY PL 3509 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0033 38 20-117-23 42 0027 PAULA N D KANNE/RYAN G KANNE J C WHITE JR&T R WHITE 2920 CASCO POINT RD 3560 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE TERA R&JAMES C WHITE JR RYAN G KANNE 3560 IVY PL 2920 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0034 38 20-117-23 42 0029 JONATHAN A MENTH Z STROUT&M STROUT 2930 CASCO POINT RD 3525 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN A MENTH ZEBADIAH STROUT 2930 CASCO POINT RD MOLLY STROUT WAYZATA MN 55391 3525 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 38 20-117-23 42 0033 JONG DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN JONATHAN P&JULIE S PAUL 3600 CASCO AVE 3532 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN JONATHAN P PAUL 4700 COVEY TR 3532 IVY PL MEDINA MN 55340 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0005 38 20-117-23 42 0034 VIL OF ORONO TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3545 IVY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 66 5413 MANITOU RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 42 0006 38 20-117-23 42 0035 HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3535 IVY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN 3535 IVY PL LAKE MTKA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0016 38 20-117-23 42 0037 WILLIAM S DAMPIER R KOCON&J GIBNEY 3550 IVY PL 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM S DAMPIER RUSSELL KOCON CLAUDIA DAMPIER JACQUELINE GIBNEY 3550 IVY PL 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0017 38 20-117-23 42 0038 C S PELLETIER&J L GRIVICH CURT FRETHAM 3548 IVY PL 3600 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTOPHER SCOTT PELLETIER CURT FRETHAM JAMIE LYNNE GRIVICH 14525 HIGHWAY 7 6265 3548 IVY PL MINNETONKA MN 55345 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0018 38 20-117-23 42 0039 MICHAEL D DRAZAN LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT LLC 3546 IVY PL 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 MICHAEL D DRAZAN LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT LLC 3546 IVY PL 14525 HWY 7 STE 265 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNETONKA MN 55345 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Date Application Received: October 29,2018 �O1 VO Date Application Considered as Complete:November 12,2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: January 11,2019 A6 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Ft Dustin Rief, City Administrator Ikrsi-iO From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: November 18, 2019 Subject: #LA18-000094,Steven Eggert o/b/o Lakewest Development and Rusty Kocon, 3570 Ivy Place, Conditional Use Permit for Permanent Dock in the Floodplain Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a permanent dock in the floodplain. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval, subject to the following conditions: Reflectors be added every 25 feet along the edges of the dock A path no wider than 4 feet be maintained for access to the dock. All requirements of the DNR and Watershed District shall be followed. Background The property is and has been the subject of a number of recent land use applications. The lot was created in 2018 as part of the Ivy Place Plat (LA18-14). In 2019, a variance was granted (LA19-28) allowing the replat of the subject parcel and Outlot A, both of Ivy Place Plat, into one parcel. The variances was necessary because Lot 1 is the 'front' lot of a front lot/ back lot plat configuration and the applicant desires lake frontage on the lagoon side. The Planning Commission and Council are concurrently considering application (LA19-41)that would replat the property as permitted by the variance. The applicant desires to install a permanent dock on the west side of the property. A permanent improvement in the flood plain requires a conditional use permit. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Applicable Regulations: Conditional Use Permit (78-1118 (3) ) Standards for floodway conditional uses (78-1119) Applicable Regulation:Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The property is guided and will continue to be used for residential purposes. FILE#LA18-000094 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 4 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Accessory docks are permitted by the zoning code. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management; The proposed dock is not expected to increase needs for these services. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The proposed dock will not increase need for water or sanitary sewer services. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The proposed dock will not increase demand of these services. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; A seasonal dock has been placed in the general area in past years. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The permanent dock is not expected to impact the neighborhood character. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The permanent dock is not expected to impact the character of the improvements in the surrounding area. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The permanent nature of the dock is not expected to impact the use and enjoyment of property in the area, provided the dock does not impact an established channel into the lake. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; No screening is proposed or recommended. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare, vibration, odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; No testimony has been offered that suggests the dock will establish a nuisance. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The permanent nature of the dock will not increase traffic. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The dock built for the floodplain will not impact tha natural features of the lake. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; no lighting is proposed and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare.The dock is not expected to introduce hazards,though adding reflectors at intervals along the dock will help winter users of the lake. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. FILE#LA18-000094 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 4 Septic System Status Not applicable. The subject property is served by municipal sewer. Conditional Use Permit Analysis The dock is proposed on the west side of Lot 1, Block 1. The dock as proposed is not intended for human habitation, and will have a low flood damage potential. The dock will not impede flood waters. Electrical features, if added, will need to be elevated above regulatory flood elevation. These meet the floodplan standards. There are two easement in the general area that may be impacted by the proposed dock. Shoreline stabilization Easement (Document T5036119) was established in 2012 to stabilize the shoreline. The easement language (Exhibit D) includes the following: "All Planted and seeded areas will be maintained in perpetuity free from mowing or other vegetative disturbance, except as specified herein, fertilizer application, yard or other waste disposal, and the placement of structures or any alterations that impede the function of the shoreline in protecting water quality, shading the riparian edge, moderating flow into any adjacent wetland or waterbody, or provided wildlife habitat." The dock is not expected to impede the water quality protection, riparian edge water shading, or moderating water flow functions. However, site improvements, including but not limited to tree and vegetative removal, storage features, and seating areas can impede these functions and should not be incorporated in the easement area. Staff concurs with the watershed district's recommendation that a path no wider than 4 feet be established for access to the dock. The Commission could require the corresponding dock sections be no wider than 4 feet. Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement(Document T05539808) The proposed improvement encroaches very minimally into the easement area, and is setback from the sanitary sewer. The improvement is not expected to impact the improvement or the easement. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff supports the Conditional Use Permit as shown, with the following conditions: List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application FILE#LA18-000094 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B. Site Plan Exhibit C. Dock Plans Exhibit D. Shoreland Stabilization Easement Document Exhibit E. Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement Document Exhibit F. Public Notice information Exhibit G. MCWD comments Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 10/29/2018 Address: 3570 IVY PL WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723420001 Land Use Number: LA18-000094 Application Submitted Property Owner By: Owner: Name: BARBARA LUPIENT Address: C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 7100 WAYZATA A BLVD #200 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55426 Applicant: Name: Steven Eggert Company: Lake West Development Address: 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 SteveEggert @lwe stdev.c orn Contact Information: Associated Contact: Steven Eggert SteveEggert@lwestdev.com Associated Contact: Perry Ryan perry@lwestdev.com Associated Contact: Curt Fretham curtf@lwestdev.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Land Use CUP for Permanent Residential Dock Land Use Application Amendmend Application Type: Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application -I Applicant Signature: PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION EXHIBIT Lot 1, Block 1, IVY PLACE SECOND ADDITION City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota t,:\\\\, - s/ LOT 1 `� , II K I I a9� �.t. \ >.e, ,° BLOCK 1�'-- _ r� 1 o 00 0 \ °(34G \IVY PLACE �� // so�s;P ` - 'r�� COND ADD . 'v � - \` � o ,'s / \5 9?, t--,,, \ i/ I / `, -70 O F o \ < i /�,� 'n \ I / ' '/ F./ / / \ o \ter .\fie i x e• 6` 4.V o /�., 5 I / / .\� v ) 1 OoG� ��\ t / / Ota s. \ v 1i, p. , Edge of Water] --) < 1 L 9e -1. 1 t VLto 00 o c? i /0 O� o9..1 �� \ ) < ( \ ( - )�O,��O,,.'�,jP I \v, - <Y I \ i\ `9 o's '} ,. li`• - \_1 \ 1 t , \ , \ 1 NOTE: �'Po \ PROPOSED DOCK LOCA11ON, DIMENSIONS poo / AND SETBACK LINES ARE SHOWN PER �r,C°oG�O�P�oy PERMANENT DOCK SITE PLAN PREPARED r-- O'� \ BY LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC -,' :c'P�� o DATED 4/9/19 1_'I 2 �^ 0 ,rte_ \� i • MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION N 0 I hereby certify that this survey,plan or report was ri.° )iiriiSl.teprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the law • r-' State of Minnesota. G R O u P Dated this 23rd day of October,201• 0 0 60 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 200 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 /111 CivilSiteGroup.com Rory L.Synstelien Minnesota License No.44565 SCALE IN FEET Project No. 17059.04 SHEET 1 OF 1 DOCK & LIFT, INC. DOCK SKETCH DOCK&LEFT Tim & Mike Latterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 >. , ,,., i,-., 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.corn e-mail: info@dockandlift.corn Custsmr Name Customer Address r.------ tlJG(.751\1 t�('x t•-.S ) I U t ft-OCE,- Customer Phone CustomeruspCity,State&Zip _ Date f U4--� Thl Y 3°\ 1 bf" /t o! Customer E-Mail r -\-c cEO S ,cx-1--O._.Jnac\ C.c IA 313.11- ._..._..... '-- r t .....,:44 : I) illt4e*P•' 4 i woo( {0.,„1,44 - ii ibifii---- , ,, . • : • : : : AP? Crasspi!e a ,y /i, 3,x81 •, ---.4-44-444i.---- .___ r r r , _ 1 t r-•._r_._-r_...r____ ....1.... .... ..L....1....t.r..t J....J....J.... .... ._..1.... .... ...1....1 DOCK & LIFT, INC. DOCK SKETCH DOCKL.IFT Tim & Mike Latterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 .Lf ., 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 vwww.dockandllft.Corn e-mail: info@dockandlift.com Ccust1r Name Customer Address om Ttll 01 .z N1 35-10 Uvr jLf-_ Customer Phone C tomer City,State&Zip Date UW`z n 3 9 I l aP.,�/t5 Customer E-Mail 1 9At Wog it n _ ..__ I f Pr 7xS Cros,SPF��� • $ vr- 1 .74 I DOCK & LIFT, INC. DOCK SKETCH DocK LIFT Tim & Mike Latterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 • :,,, , 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.corn e-mail: info@dockandlift.corn Customer Name Customer Address _ 1 ( .....D 1 N, � �-, Customer Phone Customer City,State&Zip Date OCCO° `1J.n`i 1 10/41,/)9 Customer E-Mail (\k- N0. P - "01..crnO\A ,C_.01\ L. 1 1 1 s y y-.._.___.- ..._.__- ....___...,,...-_ _....y • 119 r iii ' • • • r i 41P • r s PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION EXHIBIT Lot 1, Block 1, IVY PLACE SECOND ADDITION City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota \\ �I \ ,,.., s/ LOT 1 <�Tt <:--- „,..s.r y \ ,,, G� yam . <; ., -, r t \ C \ of Q� J<y/ r -, , r � �y BLOCK 1- (-.� _ O \ � � ° \IVY PLACE Y( I O��Se"`O^'�� \\deer \ �c3K \`\ ` ` - r • r� 1,41> \ t I- \\ r" �5 I 1 S � �- S ° \ :-" COND ADD . 4., fry �.N. \ \ - ‘ ,4 " i , ��' • \ �, s.1 \ "I 1 / \ �\ tr 0 \ ,eA J • \ 1/4 \ _ �`/ - � . /H \ \ / // / ~' • \ tI) I ' _ / /ii / r 1 z- \illb , .c. � //�e�y / /// s s l e . / eo • c�l. 4 ' . ^� u, _ / / 0- cP Rs / / / ..e1 i / . ` y J < t , 64-d° � �0 i / i /// `a --`\-/ k/- & p 'O !i,�'O Edge of Water) I j' " J t 1 t • m SOF1pL / - _� ° or -� � - � �mo 'y \ rot i .. \ I_ sor ')o, t r'\ , -- \�, -- y ,L,'7,, sh l v r �\ \, .oE0,. °iy j •/ r\ ' - � ( \ ,4 , 0. • \ 1 < 1 , • / 5. - Y V J / N..../ NOTE: 4,° / PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION, DIMENSIONS .0 o o /j AND SETBACK LINES ARE SHOWN PER `0r°o`0 •,„ PERMANENT DOCK SITE PLAN PREPARED r' \ BY LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC - V-)0 '9', ,0 DATED 4/9/19 r", ', , Z°4` - -' i ct `• `Y �/ MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION N � - i I hereby certify that this survey,plan or report was t site prepared dul byL me or underd my dyot under I and that I r am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the I- r "tate of Minnesota. a R 0 u P ted this 23rd day of October.201' 0 1 60 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 200 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 IIS CivilSiteGroup.com Rory L.Synstelien Minnesota License No.44565 SCALE IN FEET Project No. 17059.04 SHEET 1 OF 1 DOCK & LIFT, INC. " Tim & Mike Latterner 4550 Shoreline Drive DOCK& LIFT Spring Park, MN 55384 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 S A I ES AN SERVICEFax: 952/471-2608 e-mail: info@dockandlift.com www.dockandlift.com Rusty Kocon 3570 Ivy Place Orono, MN 55391 Specs for Piling Dock: We will furnish all labor, material and equipment to install piling dock as per sketch. Material to be used will be 8" to 10" in diameter treated piling, pressure treated stringers and cross pieces and 2" x 8" decking. All lag bolts and decking screws are plated. Piling length vary between 20' and 35', driven into lake bottm 5' to 10'. Distance between piling varies between 10' to 16'. Any alterations to the dock lay out could change this quote. Thank you for the opportunity to give you a proposal on this project. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. Sincerely, Tim Latterner Doc No T5036119 Certified, filed and/or recorded on 12/31/12 4:00 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Rachel Smith, Acting Registrar of Titles Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 18 Pkg ID 901016M Doc Name: Declaration Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs New Certs 1086468 • • This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. DECLARATION THIS DECLARATION ("Declaration") is made this 23 day of April , 2012 by the Estate of James W. Lupient and the James W. Lupient Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Richard Lupient created by Trust Agreement dated February 1, 1991 (Declarant) and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation(City) in favor of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), a special purpose local unit of government with purposes and powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D. RECITALS WHEREAS,Declarant owns real property within the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, platted and legally described as: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, CASCO PONT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the Property) and no one other than Declarant, has any right, title or interest in the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property constitutes the entirety of the land to which MCWD Permit #11-048 applies; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the MCWD as a condition to issuance of Permit#11-048 for the mutual benefit of the MCWD and the owners of the Property; and WHEREAS,Declarant has granted the City an easement (the Easement) for the portions of the Property subject to this Declaration and referred to hereinafter as the shoreline stabilization area and legally described in Exhibit F attached hereto; and WHEREAS, City agrees to perform all shoreline stabilization activities and maintenance as noted herein, and Declarant agrees to allow City to perform all such shoreline stabilization activities and maintenance. 159869v1 NOW,THEREFORE,Declarant makes this Declaration and hereby declares that this Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the Property in perpetuity, and further declares that the Property shall be owned, used, occupied and conveyed subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens set forth in this Declaration, all of which shall be binding on all persons owning or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property, and their heirs, successors, personal representatives and assigns. 1. Shoreline Stabilization. The City shall perform all shoreline stabilization area activity as shown in Attachments A,B, C,D &E, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and the City will maintain the shoreline stabilization area as follows: YEAR 1 a. Watering will occur as needed to ensure new plantings receive 1-2"of water per week. When feasible, watering will occur early in the morning and avoided from 12:00 pm to 5:00 pm. b. The project area will be inspected for weeds at,least once every two weeks during the growing season. Weeds will be hand pulled or spot treated with aquatic formulations of herbicide according to instructions on the herbicide label. c. Mulch will be added to the project area as needed throughout the growing season to prevent soil erosion, weed growth,and to hold in soil moisture. d. Wave barriers and fencing to keep out predators (if applicable) will be maintained as necessary as plants become established. e. The City will submit to the MCWD a brief written report that describes the maintenance activities performed, including dates, locations of inspection,maintenance activities performed; notes on successful species, weed problems, disturbances issues (animal or human) and management needs; and photographs of the project area. YEAR 2 a. Watering will occur as needed to ensure plantings receive 1" of water per week. When feasible, watering will occur early in the morning and avoided from 12:00 pm to 5:00 pm. b. The project area will be inspected for weeds at least once every three weeks during the growing season. Weeds will be hand pulled or spot treated with aquatic formulations of herbicide according to instructions on the herbicide label. c. Mulch will be added to the project area as needed throughout the growing season to prevent soil erosion,weed growth, and to hold in soil moisture. 159869v1 2 d. Upland and shoreland plantings will be replaced and seeded areas will be reseeded as necessary in the spring and fall. e. Any wave barriers will be removed within 2 years of the installation. f. The City will submit to the MCWD a brief written report that describes the maintenance activities performed, including dates, locations of inspection,maintenance activities performed; notes on successful species, weed problems, disturbances issues (animal or human) and management needs; and photographs of the project area. YEAR 3 a. The project area will be inspected for weeds at least once a month during the growing season. Weeds will be hand pulled or spot treated with aquatic formulations of herbicide according to instructions on the herbicide label. b. Mulch will be added to the project area as-needed throughout the growing season to prevent soil erosion, weed growth, and to hold in soil moisture. c. Upland and shoreland plantings will be replaced and seeded areas will be reseeded as necessary in the spring and fall. d. The City willsubmit to the MCWD a brief written report that describes the maintenance activities performed, including dates, locations of inspection,maintenance activities performed; notes on successful species,weed problems, disturbances issues (animal or human) and management needs; and photographs of the project area. ONGOING a. The project area will be inspected at least annually and any erosion or structural problems observed will be corrected within 30 days of inspection to establish and maintain a naturalized, ecologically healthy shoreline that is structurally stable and resistant to erosion. b. Removal of invasive species will occur on an ongoing basis. Weeds will be hand pulled or spot treated with aquatic formulations of herbicide according to instructions on the herbicide label. c. All planted and seeded areas will be maintained in perpetuity free from mowing or other vegetative disturbance, except as specified herein, fertilizer application,yard or other waste disposal, and the placement of structures or any other alteration that impedes the function of the shoreline in protecting water quality, shading the riparian edge, moderating flow into any adjacent wetland or waterbody, or providing wildlife habitat. 159869v1 3 d. Upland and shoreline plantings will be replaced and seeded areas will be reseeded as necessary in the spring and fall of each year in accordance with the approved plan to maintain the ecological health and function of the shoreline. 2. Violation. Violation of any provision of this Declaration is a violation of the Declaration as well as a violation of the MCWD permit for the project for which the MCWD may take action against the City. 3. "Property owner" as used in this Declaration means the owner of the property on which is located the facilities to which the obligations herein apply. 4. "City" as used in this Declaration means the City of Orono. 5. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have executed this instrument the day and year first set forth. 41:- DECLARANT: bara K.Lupient,Pers nal Representative for the Estate of James W. Lupient Ra ph Strangis,Personal Representative for the Estate of James W. Lupient, and Trustee for the James W. Lupient Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Richard Lupient STALE,OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) ? The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi day of Ni ( , 2012,by Barbara K. Lupient, personal representative of the Estate of James W. Lupient, on behalf of the Estate. i Notary Public LESLIE E.JOHNSON 159869v1 4 NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA .;0,44.,; 'My Commission Expires Jan.31.2015 v STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF Agt.its-Plo) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (Z day of Popr1 l , 2012, by Ralph Strangis, as personal representative of the Estate of James W. Lupient, on behalf of the Estate, and as Trustee of the James W. Lupient Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Richard Lupient, on behalf of the Trust. G. boi.u81,1„) JUUE A,DALEIDEN NotaPublic MY •`� ��;:,. NOTARY PUBLIC•MINNESOTA �+* , MYCOMM{88IONDARES 01/31/ 18 f CITY OF ORONO -- By: ia. Irtt-(4)4.14.,' Lili Tod McMillan,Mayor By. i'essica Loftu., C ty • ei inistrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c:17 day of , 2012, by Lili Tod McMillan and Jessica Loftus,respectively the Mayor and City Adminis or of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council, Mortgagor. �slff°flr f frIJ_S MONCAA.FADNESS . SAle, NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan.31,2017NotaryPublic ll1lJ!l✓l✓✓✓./l!./llllllll-llr./� This Instrument Was Drafted By: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 159869v1 5 Attachment A r7l 'f 41/4 ©© ily.-7,p � pi t , t Iv 0_eV _Avp4eeiselic„,,b4rT , I7rE9Y OSV' � *1)444h 1t64ittiitV14/ f� Q illiti"tr. el % 41,1 tt #4 qtt _All*-•$Al '' ''--,1 14%. il ii ,i alto C:p i p El .%44414441';‘\\4 4 © \ i 1 11. 1 PA Vt. r�011$ SHORELINE RESTORATION © al ---1 .___Vc3` .,,,ImitsFIET 1i SHORELINE RESTORATION ORONO,MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 BOtt@.St300 1 CARMANS BAY SHORELINE RESTORATION 1 , 000139080230_FIGURES1.DwG OAtE:nediO110.2011 COMM:000134-10000.0 Attachment B -q SHORELINE STABILIZATION ZONE, - 11;;..L........1. ACCESS ZONE AND EXISTING WOODED AREA.ALL TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 9.64'FROM / BASELINE ALIGNMENT IS A 20 FOOT 6-INCHES OR LESS AND DEAD TREES 10+00 TO MH 283 OFFSET TO THE PROPOSED OHW LINE SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED IN \ N. ,.v,,,.i .93 THIS ZONE. PRUNE ALL REMAINING 1 MI -i , TREES TO A HEIGHT OF TEN FEET. / PROPOSED OHW(929.4) --,..;*):N.,:',,, �* ! —-- --— EXISTING OHW(929.4) "� t -- 100-YEAR HWL(931.5) /i a ��' �\�`� 14.23'FROM 7.57'FROM �� s'\� 4 X4.4+ r-1rt 2-s�l 1+85 TO MH 284 a .�•••::-\ \._\`'' ,:, 3+56.63 TO MH 285 / � _ A . / ''', `11i1,;.,111.3.-_,,C,_ \<'+4,:.., ,N.,\Q„\\ .....)....i..,,,,,,.0,,,\\;77...\\:\ ...:.\:\i,„:„\,/ / i .\tic,.. ,i3O,.... ' `'`'..*.%, 7\ —- `` �—g— c .N‘1..,, ,:,.\-1 3560 3550 E° . 3548 —e---____ 3550 t‘,\ FLOATING SILT CURTAIN — SHORELINE LOCATION FROM r HENNEPIN COUNTY TOPO r ra Fl r? a k P Ch \ VI Hal( I - Z U I I L \ iII _ r SHORELINE RESTORATION-PROPOSED PLAN ORONO,MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Bostestroo CARMANS BAY SHORELINE RESTORATION K:\1391,139090371fADWWG11390903T1303-00W DATE:FEBRUARY 2011 COMM: 000119.10000-0 4. ; • Attachment C 16"FIBER ROLL ---N----40'BUFFER-REMOVE WOODY INVASIVE SPECIES TRENCH IN 4-INCHES EMERGENT PLANTING ZONE 2-3 CF BOULDERS .. 7.5'(TYP.) 10'(TYP.) 5'(TYP.)—J COMPOST GROUTING AND NATIVE --\ BUFFER PLANTING ZONE BUFFER 2 INCHES HARDWOOD SHREDDED EMERGENT PLUG PLANTINGS PLANTING _ MULCH IN BUFFER PLANTING SPACED AT 2'O.0 ZONE ZONE (SHADE) FLOATING SILT CURTAIN i { i 1E C 11_ ..._' i -_hli 1=1 --111= IIHi‘ 1 TOP OF ROCK 930.4 1 ' '' ''• I 1-111-=1 I 1=LI-1 -111-1 —11 I'— LAKE MINNETONKA OHW(929.4) # =1I11-111-11#-I IT_II-1 1- '— �. 111=111=1 I I=1 1 1.-1 1 I— ,-1 I PLANT PROTECTION FENCING- 927.5 A.-—T 111=11' [11=1 I I-I 1 I- i--I 1-' POST LOCATION-SEE DETAIL L �— 1--L=111-1M-:--ill_ I I FOR INSTALLATION __ --�rr��l► T-1 I I�' !I I 111=1TI 1 r31 1 f 1I l i 111 11 1 1 f 1-11)-I 1 I 11 III 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I- 8"SANITARY SEWER BUFFER PLUGS,2'O.0 1-1 I 1—I I I_i!I—I I L-111-111-111_1 i---111_1 111-111 III_ 1" (TYPICAL ALIGNMENT) "1=111.=111-111-1*-111 11 -111- ;111=1'` 6'(TYP.) ENKAMAT 7020 OR APPROVED EQUAL O 1 4 ". 1Mo In res SHORELINE RESTORATION-TYPICAL SECTION a. ORONO,MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 Bonestroo CARMANS BAY SHORELINE RESTORATION K:U391139D90371CAD1DWGU3909037003DWC DATE:FEBRUARY 3111 COMM:000139-10900-0 ;;., 7\ ••111••11•.•1♦••111•'1111♦••••••.••••-♦1111111••••11♦♦11 J Ire:: I 2911 f I'.. 1•+•+•11�••••❖1•�••1••-1••-.•-❖-•1•••+�••-1•.i��•••••1•.�•••+•••�•❖••1••••!•-�••�+•••-•1�• ll ✓ ..,; ;.;;...;..;.;.;.;..:;:❖:❖::•:f* :.❖:::�:•:❖:.:•:;:�❖::❖:.❖:�: Attachment D ...............•....+...1•....••1.11111111111••1••.•1.1 ......1••••111.1•.••1111..•.. •1..1..1.....•.1.•..,... .....++..•.....•.•.•••••1%•••••1••1.••..1•.•1...•1. W +•iii••iii•i•� iiliii•.iii1i i.'�'.+�ii••.•i•�iii•....i..i . 0 z ••:0:0•:.•'•••:••❖i is•ii:44•* i••0::000••i•O.O i•:.::+. bi N .•..•:;..:-.:•i:;::.::•::::•:❖:i;.:..%x::•::.:::.:::•i••: .: Vii:• ::: J 8 •-iii:•:.:*••• :.•.•••i•:iii❖:•:•i:• •:::❖:❖i:❖:❖: i%i-:% ••••1•••••11.1.111.111••••••11••.•+.•.•.•••1.1♦1..0• . .A••i•.:i i•.i••••.:.:*:.•.1 ii1 O•i::••.i.i•i .0•.:.;x::x:•::•: ..••i•.•OO.i-ii 10•.00 i•..i�.i•i i•.•.i i ii0 ii•00•i ii i .O::•- F7 ♦•11111••111.1.1.111.1•.11.1.11.•.1.1..•1•.11.•. •:0•...0•i.1 i i•.•.O 0•i•Pi.•i .0�•••i-i 0 0•.0 i i0'.bi 0•ii.0•i.0 ..•1.1.1.1••1••••••11.••1111.1111.11-•11.11.11-.1.11111 r 111.11••.-•1.••111•••...1•.11••.••1111.11•..1••1.+1•.1• ♦1.11.1111+111.1111111.11.11.111111111111111111111.1111 •11111••1.1111.1.•1...••1111.11.•1••1.1.•••••••.•11.111 •bi 0•i000bb•❖i O:001000�i Di.00•i O••1+0•O.i:0�i...i OOA.O i06 .1.111111111•.1111.111♦1.111111••11.•1.111.11.11••1111• 111+••1.1111111111.111111111111111.11.1.11.1.11.111••1 ••1••••1.1.•1.1.1•••1111 •1111+•••1••1••1+1•••.1.11111• 1111/1111111111.•1.1.111•.1•••1+••••1.111•••1•••1••11•• •11.1••.••••1••1••+••+••.1•••11.1••1••1••••11•••••1•••• 1.••1.1.1111.1••••.11••••1•+•11111.1.11..1111.111•••11♦ • :i•:-:•ii:•i i•:i•00:•i•��:%i�i:•i0••:��.:iii0;::%O�i;:�:;:•:;i:i:•ii:•i❖ :� �:;:�:�:o ;:�: 5,:;:::.:::;:: ::... °�:�:�3:�::�: 2 INCHES HARDWOOD SHREDDED ::•:•3:•:ti❖:❖::❖:❖:❖❖:❖:❖.:o❖:o.:.❖...•:oo:::❖.:;.•:❖:$••;• MULCH IN BUFFER PLUGS .3: :: �3:,:t:;; 1 Attachment E 1 [ii i:r,.,: f zvil ,,i UPLAND SIDE ••�or ••• it ❖J•!.•••.Q•O•i•1; /.i�i ••••••' •• ••'1• RAMSE:RL(2i .•••••••••• '••••�•••�► it *••••.,•••• OQ • ... •�'*I::: 1.Remove Seedling from oatame M ••••••♦ .�••• ••icontainer stock b mni �••••••••••- .•••••'• 2.Protea roots from drying .••••••••- during trem0atkn Resets •-•..=�. .•.•••• 11 LAKE SIDE '00•••••••••••♦•• • •••4j•••• 3.gmrdY Drax e6 dnna9ed rss�Q Ni•••••❖.•••••❖••••••;fir••••••••• •..�•Y.., ♦�.• �►• Qatgnete1 roots it"root .,•.,•�.•••O••••••.;,•••••.... •Op•••,••� it2 ..Ap�drrodentprotemon,M,m •.I.• •••••• ••••..•.••••••.._. n...e•4 •• ii "STM'��� \..- PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL Match Sky* • 2 • 2' • RODENT EXCLUSION FENCE \A • 1. 6'STEEL"T"POST INSTALLED ATA MINIMUM 18" BELOW GRADE,PLACED PER PLAN • • • 2. 3'HIGH TEMPORARY FENCE WITH ONE SQUARE INCH OR LESS OPENINGS SECURED TO POSTS INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE NON-PHOTODEGRADABLE PLANTING DETAIL NYLON CABLE TIES PER POST. 2.O. 3. BOTTOM OF FENCE MUST MAKE CONTACT WITH GROUND SURFACE. SHORELINE RESTORATION-DETAILS ORONO,MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 Ronestroo CARMANS BAY SHOREUNE RESTORATION K:U391139090371CA ADWOIL3909037 DETARSLWG DATE:FEBRUARY 2011 COMM:060139.10000-0 • EXHIBIT "F" TO DECLARATION Public Drainage and Shoreline Stabilization Easement Area Description: A permanent easement for public drainage and shoreline stabilization purposes over,under, and across those parts of Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, said Hennepin County; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 01 seconds East, assumed bearing along the north line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 20, a distance of 147.51 feet;thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds East, 3031.61 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described;thence North 89 degrees 31 minutes 13 seconds West, 33.91 feet;thence South 35 degrees 00 minutes 39 seconds East,48.79 feet;thence South 14 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds East, 65.04 feet;thence South 23 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East, 66.56 feet; thence South 40 degrees 37 minutes 43 seconds East,27.18 feet;thence South 38 degrees 43 minutes 33 seconds East, 45.85 feet; thence South 43 degrees 18 minutes 36 seconds East, 61.26 feet;thence South 35 degrees 37 minutes 45 seconds East,25.51 feet;thence South 08 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds East, 15.28 feet; thence North 89 degrees 28 minutes 50 seconds East,25.16 feet; thence North 07 degrees 50 minutes 37 seconds West, 19.39 feet;thence North 30 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds West, 28.35 feet; thence North 44 degrees 48 minutes 40 seconds West, 54.19 feet; thence North 40 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds West, 88.89 feet; thence North 22 degrees 08 minutes 13 seconds West,49.44 feet; thence North 14 degrees 34 minutes 50 seconds West, 30.09 feet; thence North 17 degrees 38 minutes 10 seconds West, 47.65 feet;thence North 25 degrees 58 minutes 43 seconds West, 36.23 feet to the point of beginning. Said permanent easement contains±8,499 square feet(±0.20 acres). No delinquent taxes Transfer Entered Jun 25, 2018 12:00 PM Doc No 705539808 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Hennepin County, Minnesota Jun 25, 2018 12:00 PM Mark Chapin County Auditor and Treasurer Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 26 Pkg ID 1703977C Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1465575 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. (Reserved for recording) GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor"), in consideration of One Dollar($1.00)and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,does hereby grant unto the CITY OF ORONO,a Minnesota municipal corporation,the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns,forever, a permanent easement for public drainage and utility purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit"A"and depicted on the attached Exhibit"B"(the "Easement Property"). INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors,agents, servants,and assigns,to enter upon the Easement Property at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect,repair,and maintain said public drainage and utility systems over, across,on,under,and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain,pave, and excavate the Easement Property, and the further right to remove trees,bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public drainage and utility systems. The above-named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns,that it is well seized in fee title of the Easement Property; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City;that there are no unrecorded interests in the Easement Property; and it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 1 198176v2 • IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this day of C` �x-t- 2018. GRANTOR: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC By � Curt Fretham, Its Manag- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) -Yh The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this i day of 2018,by Curt Fretham,the Manager of Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. 011it-S 1 41 Guu Notar Public /j; Z 1 CHRISTINA MARIE Notary Public d�+ - State of Minnesota .:.�" : ,0.: My Commission Expires January 31, 2022 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road,Suite 290 Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Telephone:(651)452-5000 ABS 2 198176v2 EXHIBIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Legal Description of Property: Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition.Hennepin County. Minnesota. (torrens property) Legal Description of Easement: An easement for drainage and utility purposes over, on, under,through and across that part of Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota, described as being within a 20-foot-wide strip of land the centerline of which is described as follows: Commencing at the most southwesterly corner of Lot 1,Block 1, said CASCO POINT ADDITION; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 1,a distance of 37.91 feet to the intersection of the most southerly survey line with said southeasterly line of Lot 1; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line of Lot 1, a distance of 29.47 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described;thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 124 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds, a distance of 10.64 feet;thence northeasterly, deflecting to the right 55 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds, a distance of 94.93 feet; thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 55 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds, a distance of 165.34 feet;thence northerly, deflecting to the right 24 degrees 21 minutes 29 seconds,a distance of 179.51 feet;thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 68 degrees 51 minutes 37 seconds, a distance of 32.93 feet, to the westerly line of Lot 3, said Block 1, also being the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and said centerline there terminating. 3 198176v2 EXHIBIT "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT A Description for Utility Purposes Across CASCO POINT ADDITION (11-8-17) .N M i • I I I _ f il I I i 1 1 .,/-"\.,: 1 1 I 1 �j� 1 1 $1 ." I I Iti .(3,• Il ) 1 i I. ` � 1 t11 t f �_ \ ?9 1 `�.ehmeer.y:inn o' !at , _ !� "s1 ! .! s. I i I I • C;•' _age ihnrelr.,rk� ..:., I o I R.. y�F*a��, I 'r 1*ti' ---_- -., 165.3q ri ry 1 ;. _1,_ �# :;) ..t t .� 1% r. 1 1 t2'a� 1 1 l •.o i 'p An easement for utility purposes over under and across that par of Lots 1, 2 and 3. `'' -1 _ '� 1 Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin Z5.64 , •••• t-----__ County, Minnesota, described as being within a 20 foot wide strip of land the �r'a centerline of which s described as Follows: .r' _ r.., 1'` Commencing at the most southwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, sad CASCO POINT 1tn I ADDITiON;thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 1,a distance of .r _ 4_ l 37.91 feet to the intersection of the most southerly survey line with said southeasterly i t -- - line of Lot 1; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line of Lot 1,a ti distance of 29.47 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; eSF thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 124 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds, a r# distance of 10.64 feet; thence northeasterly; deflecting to the right 55 degrees 03 i4 minutes 20 seconds, a distance of 94.93 feet; thence northwesterly, deflecting to the z I isF,R left 55 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds, a distance of 165.34 feet; thence rcrtherly, fl g ley deflecting to the r.ghl 26 degrees 11 minutes 29 seconds, a 6 stant:e of ?19.'e1 feet; I Ihe-!re northwesterly, deflecting to the left 68 negrees 51 rrt,n,,tes !1 se::ruts, distance of:32.93 feet;to the westerly Ilse of tot 3,said Book 1,also heelr.g the snore of I ake Minnetonka;am sats centerline there tear in rtirtg• Fasernert A-aa=9,657 -.-Sq. Fr, nr C,222 - Anne.,' MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION # a a I eae•d`y!:"a!teas rrtt IepuC r IL.I.V1te lxlurid hn!I urn a 4-,.L.•LleeiKet.i L a^d Sur;tr,,::-ands`1t-.e lege::.°Inn Slate of Pl nr-'.aa, G R 0 v P Ua,R3,rls 13th daiar9^' bey 2:t r 493'W.35 HST.SUITE 203 61:":'� 0 60 15:: S'.LOUIS PARK t'N 55415 # y-- 7,, IMMINIVINNINIIIIIIIIII CI'••IISIteCro p,rnm tiny L.,Sym elle't rdlnr.•snLm-;iLYn:e rlu,44-555 SCA'F IN 1-11-1 Project No, 17059 SHEET I OF 1 4 198176v2 Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 5/22/2019 Gy r e PSf%v Y4ta' e 3650 3630 3640 �.� � `C •91$ ''''''' ;',.',1;'-'1 '.' y,r 11 t;',.::•::,..:2.... 1.1-,.:1„..,4:•,, 3600 �) ` ', . -' ah. -�2 fir. 12,, 2916 r • .' 3570 920 930 ',4 xx+ryr �-_ r r 3 s-� = :_''•5C'�l i � ' = , Pr) 00 2944 550 ._{.11 i : �. �a 3 546 R, 2948 • - 3534 Mt #Y k 29700 v v,,,,,;•,.:c. y ' • 35321 1 • r .3516 29$0 M � „ „ �t k"er ...;',:'N-f, * °508 2990ti , x ilik., tit/ QUA /*)- 3020Q51 3486 4. 509 M9$7 ,Q 3026 3030 - 0113005 l (52) 3271 3466 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I ( ( 110101 I 1 1 i I 3570 Ivy Place This data (i) is furn•shed 'AS IS with norepresentation asto completeness or accuracy, (i)is furnished with nowarranty of any knd; and (ii) is curactable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shat not be liablefor any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGiS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,M N 55487/g is.nfo@hennepi n.us RUN DATE:06/25/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 31 0031 38 20-117-23 34 0025 38 20-117-23 42 0029 DAVID J PICHOTTA D J HASSELMAN&J HASSELMAN Z STROUT&M STROUT 2914 CASCO POINT RD 3020 CASCO POINT RD 3525 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID J PICHOTTA DANIEL J HASSELMAN ZEBADIAH STROUT 2914 CASCO POINT RD JESSICA HASSELMAN MOLLY STROUT WAYZATA MN 55391 PO BOX 1238 3525 IVY PL RANCHO SANTE FE CA 92067 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0032 38 20-117-2334 0026 38 20-117-23 42 0033 EMMA LOU POWELL A DETERMAN&T DETERMAN JONATHAN P&JULIE S PAUL 2916 CASCO POINT RD 3026 CASCO POINT RD 3532 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 EMMA LOU POWELL ANTHONY F DETERMAN JONATHAN P PAUL 2916 CASCO PT RD TRINA D DETERMAN 3532 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 3026 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0033 38 20-117-23 42 0005 38 20-117-23 42 0034 PAULA N D KANNE/RYAN G KANNE VIL OF ORONO TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC 2920 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3545 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE CITY OF ORONO TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC RYAN G KANNE PO BOX 66 5413 MANITOU RD 2920 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0034 38 20-117-23 42 0006 38 20-117-23 42 0035 JONATHAN A MENTH HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW 2930 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3535 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN A MENTH HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND SAMSON CYRIL DRENTLAW 2930 CASCO POINT RD NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN 3535 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 LAKE MTKA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0035 38 20-117-23 42 0016 38 20-117-23 42 0037 R G SORENSEN/S D SORENSEN WILLIAM S DAMPIER R KOCON&J GIBNEY 2940 CASCO POINT RD 3550 IVY PL 3570 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT G SORENSEN WILLIAM S DAMPIER RUSSELL KOCON STACI D SORENSEN CLAUDIA DAMPIER JACQUELINE GIBNEY 2940 CASCO POINT RD 3550 IVY PL 3570 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0036 38 20-117-23 42 0017 38 20-117-23 42 0038 PAUL F JOHNCOX C S PELLETIER&J L GRIVICH CURT FRETHAM 2948 CASCO POINT RD 3548 IVY PL 3600 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL F JOHNCOX CHRISTOPHER SCOTT PELLETIER CURT FRETHAM 2948 CASCO POINT RD JAMIE LYNNE GRIVICH 14525 HIGHWAY 7#265 WAYZATA MN 55391 3548 IVY PL MINNETONKA MN 55345 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0038 38 20-117-23 42 0018 38 20-117-23 42 0039 EDWARD PEKARIK JR MICHAEL D DRAZAN LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT LLC 2990 CASCO POINT RD 3546 IVY PL 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ED PEKARIK JR MICHAEL D DRAZAN LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT LLC 2990 CASCO POINT RD 3546 IVY PL 14525 HWY 7 STE 265 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNETONKA MN 55345 38 20-117-23 31 0042 38 20-117-23 42 0019 38 20-117-23 43 0051 JONG DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN RAY F WILSON WILLIAM D GUST 3600 CASCO AVE 3534 IVY PL 3034 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN RAY F WILSON WILLIAM D GUST 4700 COVEY TR 3534 IVY PL 3034 CASCO POINT RD MEDINA MN 55340 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0060 38 20-117-23 42 0022 38 20-117-23 43 0052 J A MARTINSON ET AL TRUSTEES J&S WHITE KRISTEN M/ANDREW V RONNINGEN 2970 CASCO POINT RD 3516 IVY PL 3030 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JERRY&BONNIE MARTINSON JAMES M&SHERRY D WHITE KRISTEN&ANDREW RONNINGEN 2970 CASCO POINT RD S 3516 IVY PL 3030 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0061 38 20-117-23 42 0027 38 20-117-23 43 0054 J R MILLER&A R MILLER J C WHITE JR&T R WHITE LEISEL&MARK PFLEGHAAR 2980 CASCO POINT ED 3560 IVY PL 3509 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JONATHAN R&AMY R MILLER TERA R&JAMES C WHITE JR LEISEL&MARK PFLEGHAAR 2980 CASCO POINT RD 3560 IVY PL 3509 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:06/25/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Steve Eggert From: Heidi Quinn <hquinn@minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 3:47 PM To: Steve Eggert Cc: Christine Mattson (Orono); Melanie Curtis; mcook@lmcd.org Subject: RE: Ivy Place Permanent Dock Request -Variance Application to City of Orono Attachments: Executed and Recorded Declaration - Carman Bay Shoreline Restoration.pdf; 17-367 Shoreline Stabilization.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good Afternoon Steve, The location of the proposed dock as changed since MCWD reviewed the original permit application. Based on review of the updated plan, no MCWD permit modification or Board approval is required. A 4'wide path may be mowed through the wetland buffer to access the dock without modifying the declaration. While the dock will come into contact with the wetland fringe and area of shoreline stabilization easement, docks are typically not regulated under WCA as an impact and MCWD does not foresee the dock impeding the function of the shoreline. For your reference, I have attached an exhibit showing the easement and the declaration associated with the property. Thank you, Heidi 0 Heidi Quinn I Permitting Technician I Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard I Minnetonka, MN 55345 I Office: 952-641-4504 From:Steve Eggert [mailto:SteveEggert@Iwestdev.com] Sent: Monday,April 15, 2019 2:32 PM To: Heidi Quinn <hquinn@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: RE: Ivy Place Permanent Dock Request-Variance Application to City of Orono Heidi, Were you able to take a look at this since last Wednesday? Thanks, 111 LAKE WT DEVELIP1/111 LLC Steven Eggert Planner O 952.653.1346 SteveEggert@lwestdev.com 1 www.lakewestdevelopment.com From: Steve Eggert Sent:Wednesday,April 10, 2019 1:43 PM To: 'Heidi Quinn'<hquinn@minnehahacreek.org> Subject: Ivy Place Permanent Dock Request-Variance Application to City of Orono Hi Heidi, Thanks for taking my call this morning. See attached for the permanent dock on the cove side to compare to your previous drawings. Let me know if anything has changed or needs updating. If I do not need a permit, please write a formal letter/memo stating no permit is required in the form of a PDF. Thank you, iiiLAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC Steven Eggert Planner O 952.653.1346 SteveEggert@lwestdev.com www.lakewestdevelopment.com 2 Date Application Received: 09/20/19 Date Application Considered as Complete:10/21/19 "W` YO 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 02/18/20 11 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members , ` Dustin Rief, City Administrator G1 4kESHOy`� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner i'Y1GG Date: 18 November 2019 Subject: #LA19-000085, Chris &Amy Evenson, 780 Lakeview Pkwy (L7, B3, Lakeview of Orono) Vacate portion of Conservation Easement Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting to vacate a portion of the Lakeview of Orono Conservation Easement. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background The applicants' original home was constructed in 2017; not long after completion they suffered a total loss fire.The home was rebuilt and completed in August 2018; a temporary certificate of occupancy was issued as the landscaping/vegetation was not yet established. This summer,the owners finalized their landscaping and requested the Final certificate of occupancy. Part of the permit compliance is verification of grading and final landscape improvements shown on an As- Built survey. Upon review of the As-Built survey,staff noted improvements (fencing, pergola/arbor, and raised planter beds) constructed or placed within the 10-foot required setback from the Conservation Easement and within the Conservation Easement established with the Plat of Lakeview of Orono. Improvements are prohibited within the Easement. In order to finalize the building permit and issue the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the home, the encroachments must be resolved.The applicants are requesting to solve this by vacating the encroached-upon portions of the Conservation Easement rather than removing/moving the improvements. Staff Analysis Staff understands the intent of the installed fence location was to conform to the edge of the established Easement area defining the limits of the yard. However,as constructed the fence and arbor sit approximately 4.5 feet inside the Easement area; two of the four raised planting beds are within the 10-foot setback from the Easement. There is no relief such as a variance from the Conservation Easement requirements. The applications are therefore requesting to modify the established Conservation Easement area on their property by vacating the 10 foot area from the edge of the fencing. FILE#LA19-000085 18 Nov 19 Page 2 of 3 The requirement for the 10-foot setback from the Easement is detailed in the Development Agreement (Exhibit E) page 9, paragraph K. Page 2, paragraph 1 of The Lakeview of Orono Conservation Easement (Exhibit D) outlines the Prohibited and Permitted Uses. Regarding improvements,the following are specifically prohibited: • Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything, including buildings, structures, walkways,fences, retaining walls, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads, hardcover of any kind, underground utility lines and distribution equipment, light poles, traffic signals, traffic regulatory signs, mailboxes;except: 1)Feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; 2)Docks or boardwalks when allowed by City ordinance and under a valid City permit; 3)Retaining walls when allowed by City ordinance and under a valid City permit;and 4)A private sewage treatment system Additionally, the following are specific prohibitions regarding vegetation or grading within the Easement area: • Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting, destroying or removing trees greater than four inches in diameter, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance;as a part of an approved vegetation management plan; and, to maintain, repair and reconstruct any storm water ponds and facilities within the Easement Premises. Grantor may remove brush, diseased or dead trees of any size, buckthorn and noxious weeds. • Excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland;dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. Environmental sensitivity was an important discussion topic during the creation of the Lakeview of Orono development. The City Council requested conservation easement to protect the rural nature of the development. Staff is sensitive to the loss of the family home due to fire. However, this loss does not support the encroachment into the conservation easement and the reduction in its size. The conservation easement is intended to establish areas for the preservation of natural lands, these easements should be protected. Public Comments Public comments have been received; comments are attached as Exhibit L. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Commission find it appropriate to reduce the size of the conservation easement for the convenience of the applicants? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends denial of the request to vacate the Easement area. The fencing and improvements should be moved to the permitted locations. FILE#LA19-000085 18 Nov 19 Page 3 of 3 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Applicants' Narrative Exhibit C. As-Built Survey Exhibit D. Lakeview of Orono Conservation Easement Exhibit E. Lakeview of Orono Development Contract Exhibit F. Existing Easement Exhibit Exhibit G. Proposed Easement (After Vacation) Exhibit Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit I. Permit History Exhibit J. Property Owners List Exhibit K. Plat Map Exhibit L. Public Comments Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 09/20/2019 Address: 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0611723430021 Land Use Number: LA19-000085 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: CHRISTOPHER T EVENSON Address:AMY M EVENSON 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND, MN 55364 Applicant: Name: Chris Evenson Company: Address: 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono, MN 55364 chris.evenson@pepsico.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: CHRISTOPHER T EVENSON Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Amendment application Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application iii Appeal of Admin Decision 3-.- Concept Application `-1 Conditional Use Permit (- Site Plan Application r_ Subdivision Application -.. Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: RE: Orono Land Use Application#LA19-000085/780 Lakeview Parkway,Orono/Christopher and Amy Evenson This application is an after the fact approval of encroachments within the Lakeview of Orono Conservation Easement which exists on Evensons'property at 780 Lakeview Parkway(hereinafter the"Evenson Property")as"Easement Parcel D"as shown on the plat of Lakeview of Orono.Also referenced on survey dated 08/22/19 by Sathre Bergquist. The encroachments include a fence and an archway with a gate. Additionally, the Development Contract negotiated between the city of Orono and Lakeview of Orono stipulates a 10-foot setback for all principal and accessory structures from the Conservation Easement. The Evensons have constructed raised planter beds within this 10-foot setback. They have requested City approval to allow the encroaching improvements to remain. The Evensons' request involves modification or vacation of a 156'x 5.8' portion of Easement Parcel D over the Evenson Property. Also requested is an amendment to the Development Contract to remove the conservation easement 10-foot setback requirement. CVASE- —P (Z Sod , on behalf of the Lakeview of Orono Homeowners Association/Developer of Lakeview of Orono, acknowledge participation in application#LA19-000085 to adjust the con tion ease en boundary. Signed: Its, ScczE ./ gl Date: l0/0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 'L )ss. COUNTY OF I ehncp,,. ) `,T- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ! 1 i mst,eday of 4^ , 20) by (Mast Pe1ersa- ,on behalf of the Lakeview of Orono Homeowners Association/Developer of Lakeview of Orono. AMY JEAN WILLIAMS 5.*—' 3 NOTARY STATE Of M PUBLIC A I Not..ry 'ublic �--- '' My Commission Expires January 31,20234 Further, my signature below indicates the Lakeview of Orono Homeowners Association's support/approval of the Evensons' request. Signed' A- 1` Its, Date: O(c.t( � STATE OF MINNESOTA j L )ss. COUNTY OF tiO/n /r ) The foregoin instrument was acknowledged before me this q day of a('�71 , 20/47, by CM'Se, f•&rSOYh ,on behalf of the Lakeview of Orono Homeowners Association/Developer of Lakeview of Orono. AMY JEAN WILLIAMS i5: • •� NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public `` STATE OF MINNESOTA ' My Commission Expires January 31,20234 Explanation of Evenson Deed Variance Request Moved into our home at 780 Lakeview Parkway on June 23, 2017 with completed landscaping that included a fenced-in backyard. On July 13, 2018 we had a devastating house fire that resulted in a total loss. We re-built on the same lot and completed the landscaping including the fence that we had prior to the fire plus some improvements. Moved back into our re-built home on August 9, 2019. When the "as built" survey was submitted,we were informed of a conservation easement that had not been indicated on any of the previous surveys and we were unknowingly 5 feet over within our own property. Our original "as built" survey through our 15t builder did not indicate a conservation easement. Now that we are settling our family back into our home, we are simply requesting a 5 foot variance on our property. 1�,,.. yt sk,. / P according Descnmthe recd ed V.plat Mek 3mo,Menne IEWOFORONO, / acc R the recorded Plat tAem+E lfennePin CmmN,Miruxsota. / \5,Is 55.5Add.eu.750 Lake,iew Parkway,Orono.Muucwu. J / / @ J hown art Oman ximate only fox� y.r Malii ne"rsnme me e..ium of air 5 h He RRrenailawfully h. rvmpon.sittle for anv and all damages arising out m exactly ate rve.e r dad en en nitulueradursn NN \ �rnee R mum=.25,open em to accommodate y // \ o �i"•t '� / .� hundred.nf.roma.e/ �., _- I. .�M / he used„benchmarks r . 4° . `e c�trnrom ern `ay aeon b.aend.dt �rrno nt a P,0 m.mt..tl n me en. shall e built. aN % a:> d j I I 5i.+ '. d .' ":mraa _ i surveyOnly eeaseme,tsa; recorded Ke:,.,wiee k.a'-w--6''---,---=_.. e ",S"t 1 .... nd..,e am hereon. �a. Promw1 mn 1 imI i nR foundation refers t pl o/ Fnu� = , ' ; of black JO / firIIS .. -• m7 y5enoce avert prior to y concrete work / h"..4,4'!:;k, t �� ®BLOCK• ,/P DoT Proposed Elev./Ions,0 • //:PS , tA ..fig. IL, ;4 n.R I .n., Pm—'As:: • F 3n 6el 'n a vR JF re, ,IW.R P ,,/ / �ife� t4 .moo .m ,`i' ‘7"..P.6',' `' ' wP RAP structure ..n°,tn hereon re previous tructn,e Mata,on mr„ite • w ,g Fa Setbacks � 1/'''f•.:„. kg FII, F/ min„ w ,P 1. , i�pS" �.t Rt., at:n.t , l \ • y I /' �, I N / \`I N I qN I \�Lx.[v .xR • .' 0.101 \y '_\.-�,.J , I.�,.: Jnr,«..rr..r,r....,.r"..,t I ."°"�I .n,. 0 15 30 PO ISSI i / ▪ .-1-'''''..:: i 1 >o SCALE IN FEET / I m 1 SURVEY LEGEND CS cosi RCN kiCKASENS WOE WALICOJT 6EYATION ISO BELL ". wwc SETBACK CRE'"/ m,. EA.TV ----v. dL_ ; AO___ ___ \°" :: .rf 99 • SURVEY CONTROL PONT _ _ELECTRIC � „ •II - •I 7m, q L _$_ NAND 5RXE —10—MCP poor wococarousio Vii. \it:7,; ---d2 N64 TREE COWEROUS —.55—WS LINDERGROUND —5555—OVERHEAD 1011.1TY 0642 W 21J JJ Y om „ fi o vr. MEMO, SCR.BORING • D ELECATIW 0 TREE DECCUOUs $ 1-r— , • n IFIIDKK® saMANHOLE —5—UNITARY SEWER h: g RR,.0. O CARO o tea.", zW. aTc" ^,:® .0TRLL..,.r -.:.,wo..w, T Hats coed lio. er arm i REVISOR 150,55505 nwa.myw.. ";AL M, mwM.mrers.nN�.m..dRr�.m.myuemkPT,ctCEzd see.wFILE NO. °PAWN 5 JAR 9426/1010 SILT rENCE a 131,01)COVER STRICT,PROMISITE0 AnD1001,0515C.NERE0UsT.NC, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1211 r°``"`"43"'3°'8 SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC.CRE °"` °" ��� /// �, a PR «.:ao. tw,OCOrr"t..r, Pn^ mut Rw� ‘„ 1511 SOUTH BROADWAY www.AATHRE.COM wnru,A.MR.SsaRt(esa)nsemO PREPARED FOR: 21 LEGAL,RrR°LTrn°.„On.L.eNM.e.E Mr�a LwAa.R NORTON HOMES 11011 1111 I I 11111 11111 I 11 11111 Doc No T05284387 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Aug 25, 2015 11:32 AM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 96 Pkg ID 1284495C Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1405129 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Developer and City Installed Improvements) LAKEVIEW OF ORONO Project Number 15-3723 PUD No. 10 THIS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ("Contract") dated July 15th, 2015, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company(the "Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat and a Planned Residential Development for "LAKEVIEW OF ORONO" (referred to in this Contract as the "Plat"). The Land is situated in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the Plat and Planned Residential Development on condition that the Developer enters into this Contract and furnishes the security required by it. The City will cause the Plat to be duly recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles or County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, promptly after compliance by the Developer with all 180976 6/22/15 mpg conditions precedent to such recording pursuant to this Contract,which conditions precedent the Developer shall cause to be satisfied within 180 days after the City Council approves the final Plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted,the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary "security" has been received by the City, 3)protection fencing is installed around proposed and alternate septic drain field sites, and the City has inspected and approved said fencing before land disturbing activities; 4) redundant silt fences are installed wherever work is proposed within 50 feet of wetlands, and the City has inspected and approved said silt fences prior to any land disturbing activities; and 5) the City Planner has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. N/A 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. N/A 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the Land unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary,to the full extent permitted by state law,the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan,official controls,platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract with respect to property which did not receive final plat approval prior to any such amendment. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans (collectively, the "Plans"). The Plans shall not be attached to this Contract. The erosion control plan may also be approved by Hennepin County Environmental Services and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If the Plans vary from the terms of this Contract, the terms of this Contract shall control.The Plans are: Plan A-Plat of LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,Hennepin County,Minnesota Plan B -Sheets C103 &C104(05/05/15): Existing Conditions,Removals&Tree Identification Plan C-Sheets C201 &C202(06/16/15): Final Site Plan Plan D-Sheets C301 thru C306(06/16/15):Final Grading Plan Plan E-Sheets C400A&C400B (06/16/15): Erosion&Sediment Control,Phase 1 Plan F -Sheets C401 thru C406(06/16/15): Wetland Impact&Erosion Control Plan Plan G-Sheets C501 thru C505 (06/16/15): Street and Storm Sewer Plan&Profiles Plan H-Sheet C506(06/16/15): County Road 151 Right Turn Lane 180976 6/22/15 mpg 2 Plan I -Sheet C507(06/16/15):Private Park Grading Plan Plan J-Sheet C601 thru C603 (06/16/15): Surface Water Conveyance&Treatment Plan Plan K-Sheet C701 (06/16/15): Construction Details Plan L-Native Vegetation and Management Plan by PRI dated 04/3/15 Plan M-Development Entry Monument Signage Plans dated 2/4/15 and 3/23/15 S. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built in accordance with the approved Plans(the"Improvements"): A. Site Grading,Ponding,Erosion Control and Restoration B. Setting of Iron Monuments C. Surveying and Staking D. Storm Water Management System E. Street Improvements F. Traffic Control Signs, Street Lights if/where required and Street Signs G. Trails H. Installation of Buffer Signage as Required by MCWD I. Installation of Conservation Area Signage as Required by City The Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances including those concerning erosion and drainage and any prohibiting grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment during specified hours. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. In addition,the City may,at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and an engineer inspect the work as the City may reasonably determine. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned,including the City staff,to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Improvements and before the "security" is fully released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed"Plans,and an electronic file of the"as constructed" Plans in an 180976 6/22/15 mpg 3 AutoCAD.DWG file or a.DXF file format based upon the Hennepin County coordinate system, all prepared in accordance with City standards.All elevations shall be based on the NAVD88 standard. The"as constructed"plans submitted shall contain the following information: • all electronic info on Henn.Co.Coordinates • as-built grading plan(contours,EOFs,ponds,swales,etc.) • as-built street alignments,curb,gutter,edge of asphalt,etc. • as-built sign locations, utility locations (must have as-built points showing elevations, lengths,etc.),tree locations,monument locations • as-built building locations • as-built pond contours,OHW,HWL,outlet structure locations,etc. • as-built wetland delineations • hard copies of signed as-builts (2 copies 22x34, 1 copy 22x34 Mylars, 1 copy 11x17, CD with signed PDFs of Record Plans) 9. IRON MONUMENTS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 505.021 and the Orono City Code, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the"security"is released. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 10. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits,including but not limited to the following to the extent required: • Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights-of-Way • DNR for Dewatering • City of Orono for Grading&Land Alteration and Building Permits • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for erosion control, wetland protection, waterbody crossings and structures,and storm water management permits • NPDES Permits (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems) issued by MPCA 11. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors' and subcontractors' responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all Improvements as contemplated by Section 8 and the approved Plans by August 1,2018, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The final wear course on streets shall be installed between August 15th and !80976 6/22/15 mpg 4 October 15th the first summer after the base layer of asphalt has been in place one freeze thaw cycle. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the"security"to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement must have the written approval of the City Engineer, and may be delayed or scheduled at any time of the year based upon existing site conditions at the discretion of the City Engineer. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Land to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with development of the Land. 14. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City or other permitting authority. The City or other permitting authority may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by excavation and backfilling operations shall be restored according to the terms of the permit requirements. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City or Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten(10) days,the City may draw down the "security"to pay any costs. No development,utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Land is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 15. GRADING. The Land shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading development and erosion control plan, Plans "D", "E", and "F", subject to construction plan review comments from the City Engineer. The plans shall conform to City of Orono specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds,swales,and ditches for public drainage have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the City may issue building permits to the Developer, prior to completion of all grading, provided the City Engineer has determined that adequate erosion control measures are in place, The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified 180976 6/22/15 mpg 5 elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any,and ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer certifies to the City that all lots with house footings placed on fill will have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed current FHA/HUD specifications. The Developer agrees to stake, for demonstration purposes only, the proposed areas to be dedicated to the City for possible use as parks. 16. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Land,the Developer shall comply with all recommendations of the City staff and City Engineer regarding site cleanup and restoration,including but not limited to contaminated soil removal,junk and debris removal,etc. Also,prior to any construction on the Land,the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control,street cleaning,and street sweeping. 17. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS. Developer shall enter into and execute a Private Road Easement and Maintenance Declaration. Upon completion of the Improvements,the City shall inspect the Improvements and notify Developer if any of the Improvements do not conform to the requirements of this Contract. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the ownership of roads shall be governed by the Private Road Easement and Maintenance Declaration. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in the "security." Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates. These fees shall be billed monthly. 20. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor,material, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed,the sums due them have not been paid,and the laborers, material, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22,Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts,to draw upon the"security" in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s)and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the 180976 6/22/15 mpg 6 City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the funds deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys'fees pursuant to this Contract. 21. STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE. The Land is subject to the standard Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee calculated as follows: 46 lots @ 2 acres each @$3,840 per acre,reduced by 44.8%for 65 acres preserved in Conservation Easement=$195,010.00. 22. PARK DEDICATION FEE. The Land is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement for the City of Orono. Because the value of each newly created lot in the Plat will be in excess of the threshold value of$69,375.00,the eight percent (8%)park fee cap of$5,550.00 per lot will apply;therefore,the Park Dedication Fee is calculated as follows: 46 lots x $5,550.00 per lot = $255,300.00 23. LANDSCAPING. NA 24. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to development of the Land: A. Implementation of and adherence to the findings and conditions of approval listed in Resolution No. 6474 Approving the Preliminary Plat for Property Located at 405 North Arm Drive, adopted by the Orono City Council on December 8,2014. B. Implementation of and adherence to the Planned Residential Development plans submitted by the Developer and approved by the City. C. Conservation easements for the protection of wetlands, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces must be established over those areas designated for protection on the approved preliminary plat and final plans and the designated portions of all building lots as shown on the approved Conservation/Preservation Plan drawing. Before the City signs the Plat, the Developer shall provide the City with an appropriately executed Grant of Permanent Flowage and Conservation Easement and Restrictive Covenant for Wetland (the "Conservation Easement"), in recordable form, specifying the proposed conditions and limitations to be placed on the specific areas noted above. The easement shall incorporate as a minimum the following elements: no structures allowed,no fences, no domestic animals (i.e. no horses, sheep, chickens, etc.), no tree or vegetation removal except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan, no excavating or earth movement. Creation and maintenance of non-hardcover walking paths may be allowed. Permanent markers of a design and material acceptable to the City Planning Director shall be placed at all points where the conservation easement intersects a lot boundary or where the easement boundary line changes direction. The recording of the Plat and the Conservation Easement shall be conclusive evidence of the satisfaction of this special provision. 180976 6/22/15 mpg 7 D. Implementation of and adherence to the "Native vegetation and management plan for the Lakeview Addition"by Prairie Restorations, Inc. dated April 3, 2015 with regards to preservation, enhamcement. and maintenance of woodlands, upland grass areas,wetlands,pond and stream buffers, and septic drainfield sites within the Conservation Easement areas. E. Final Plat approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") approval and permits as required. The City will not approve the Plat until the MCWD has approved the stormwater management plans and the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. F. The Plat shall adhere to the purpose and intent of the Orono Community Management Plan,as amended. G. The Developer shall establish a homeowners association providing that the homeowners association will be responsible for all future maintenance of the stormwater ponds and facilities within the Land. H. Outlots C and I are not considered as buildable lots until such time that they are replatted as residential lots. The Developer shall notify and obtain City approval for the future replatting of Outlots C and I into additional residential lots. Outlot I is intended as a privately owned park that will be opened to the public. Outlot I will be subject to a perpetual conservation easement with restrictions for passive park use. Title to Outlot I will be retained by the Lakeview Homeowners Association with conservation easement granted to Citizens for Lakeview Preservation, Inc. (CLP). Site work will be completed by SLD contemporaneous with the other Lakeview of Orono improvements. Maintenance of Outlot I shall be the responsibility of the Lakeview Homeowners Association. The City of Orono does not intend to own, maintain or accept liability for the private park in Outlot I, which obligations shall be the sole responsibility of the owners. Improvements to Outlot I shall be limited to the trails indicated on Plan I, Sheet C-507 as noted in Paragraph 7 of the Agreement; and to the specific signage improvements described in Exhibit C attached hereto. Developer shall obtain a City permit for the temporary sign, such sign to be allowed to remain in place for 90 days from the date of installation; and shall obtain a City permit for the permanent Main Park Sign. The temporary sign and Main Park Sign shall be setback no less than 10 feet from the street lot line of Outlot I. All other signage described in Exhibit C including interpretive/educational signs,tree and planting signs, and memorial or dedication signs, shall not require City permits. I. All Lots except Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 3 shall be accessed solely from a private road system which the Developer shall construct on the Land. Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 3 shall be accessed by one driveway each from North Arm Drive.The private road may be designed to preserve existing vegetation, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Before the City signs the Plat, the 180976 6/22/15 mpg 8 Developer shall provide the City with an appropriately executed permanent road, drainage, and utilities easement, in recordable form, over the outlot containing the private road. The homeowners association covenants shall provide that the private road will be maintained to reasonable standards at all times by the homeowners association and that failure of the homeowners association to so maintain the private road will be cause for the City to accomplish the needed maintenance and to assess the benefited properties for the direct cost of such maintenance. Before the City signs the Plat, the Developer shall also provide a separate "Declaration of Private Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Private Roadway Easement"for maintenance of same over the private road outlots. J. All lots have been tested and found capable of providing suitable primary and alternate sites for on-site sewage treatment systems. For all lots, mound systems will be required. Special precautions, including but not limited to protective covenants as well as physical barriers during construction activity, must be taken to protect these sites on both a short-term and long-term basis, as municipal sewers are not projected to be extended to serve the Land. Before the City signs the Plat, the Developer shall furnish an appropriately executed Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for Protection of Sewage Treatment Sites, in recordable form. With regard to Lot 17, Block 1, the primary drainfield site shall be the newly-tested site located north of the existing golf green, and shall be required to be used initially for service to the home to be constructed on said Lot. The two previously tested sites further south on said Lot shall be designated as alternate sites for possible future use if necessary. K. All of the proposed lots shall contain suitable area meeting all established setback requirements to allow the construction of single family residences. Principal structure setbacks shall adhere to the required setbacks of the underlying RR-1B Zoning District. Additionally, with the exception of septic system components designed to be within the Conservation Easement area, all principal and accessory structures shall be setback at least 10 feet from the Conservation Easement area and compliant with City wetland and wetland buffer setback requirements. L. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City prior to installation of any temporary subdivision identification signs for the Land. The City sign ordinance allows temporary subdivision identification signs on corner lots provided the signs meet area, height, and setback requirements, and provided the Developer submits a $1,000.00 per sign security guaranteeing sign removal when the subdivision is fully developed. M. The Developer shall pay to the city engineer the amounts incurred for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading. N. The Developer shall submit the final Plat in electronic format. The Plat shall be created using Hennepin County Coordinates. The electronic format shall be Auto CAD file, The Developer 180976 6/22/15 mpg 9 shall also submit two complete sets of the Plat on Mylar(one copy for the City's records and one copy for recording with Hennepin County). The Developer shall also provide one copy reduced to 1"=200'. O. The Developer shall install permanent ditch check dams at all ditch outlets to provide energy dissipation prior to runoff discharge. P. The Developer shall install Bioroll check dams as necessary in ditches to reduce runoff velocities and limit erosion until vegetation is established. Q. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota.Following construction,a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.All retaining walls required to be constructed by the Plans,or special conditions referred to in this Contract, shall be constructed before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. R. The Developer is advised that for all lots, the existing grade for determination of the number of stories and building height calculations for new homes, shall be based on the pre- development contours at the anticipated house locations as shown on Plan D. Developer acknowledges that no building pads are being created as part of the site improvements. S. The Developer shall provide information to the initial buyers of each lot regarding the allowed uses within the designated Conservation Area and regarding the necessity of preserving alternate mound drainfield sites. 25. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract,payment of the costs of all Improvements and construction of all Improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit,in the form attached hereto (the"security"),from a bank for 150% of the cost of the Improvements, including any required landscaping. The amount of the security shall be $2,869,533.65 based on the cost estimates attached hereto as Exhibit B. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, upon five(5) business days' prior written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts necessary to cure the default. If the Improvements are not completed at least thirty(30)days prior to the expiration of the security,the City may also draw it down.If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent(90%)of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer, and approved by City's Engineer, shall be retained as security until all Improvements have been completed, all financial 180976 6/22115 mpg 10 obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" Plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 26. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS AND FEES. The following is a summary of the cash requirements and fees due under this Contract, which must be paid in cash at the time of final plat approval and execution of this Contract by the City: Engineering, City Administration(escrow) $ 20,000.00 Park Dedication Fee $255,300.00 Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee $195,010.00 Total Cash Requirements &Fees $49Q,310.00 27. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Improvements against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is two years. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by the City Council. The two year warranty period on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed. The Developer shall post a maintenance bond,letter of credit or cash deposit(the"Maintenance Security")in an amount reasonably determined by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall examine the condition of the Improvements when determining the amount of the Maintenance Security. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security until the Maintenance Security is furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. 28. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Land, including but not limited to Hennepin County Environmental Services and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Land. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Plat approval and development of the Land. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers,employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims,including attorneys' fees. 180976 6/22/15 mpg 11 C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract,including engineering and attorneys'fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots,the Land, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt development and construction of the Land until the bills are paid in full.Bills not paid within thirty (30)days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent(18%)per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges as required by City ordinance or via other agencies for which City acts as agent may be imposed such as,but not limited to,sewer access charges("SAC"),City water access charges and building permit fees. 29. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder,the City may,at its option,perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48)hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act,and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the Land. When the City does any such work,the City may,in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part against any portion of the Land owned by the Developer or any successor in interest to the Developer. 30. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the City may, at its option,refuse to allow construction or development work on the Land until the Developer does comply.Upon the City's demand,the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits,including those for lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Contract. 180976 6/22/15 mpg 12 E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding,amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Contract shall run with the Land and may be recorded against the Land. The Developer covenants with the City,its successors and assigns,that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Land and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Land; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Land; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury,including death,and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of$1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten(10)days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right,power or remedy,express or implied,now or hereafter arising,available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right,power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right,power or remedy. I. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots in the Plat,the Land,or any part of it. Upon request,the City shall provide, in recordable form, a release of any lot in the Plat from this Development Contract if the City determines that the terms and conditions of this Contract have been satisfied. J. All streets shall have been graded and paved with at least one lift of bituminous surface prior to issuance of any building permits. 180976 6/22/15 mpg 13 K. All existing driveway access points on City and County roadways abutting the site that will no longer be used for vehicular access shall be graded so as to prevent vehicular access to the site at the time of final grading. L. If building permits are issued prior to the completion of all Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Improvements and damage to Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with at least one lift of bituminous surface per the provisions of Paragraph 30.J.and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer in writing. M. Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from vacant lots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. 31. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer,its employees or agents,or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 18215 45th Avenue North, Suite D, Plymouth, Minnesota 55446. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator at the following address: 2750 Kelley Parkway, Long Lake,Minnesota 55356; or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Orono City Hall,P.O.Box 66,Crystal Bay,Minnesota 55323. Either party may change the address to which notices to such party thereafter shall be given,by providing to the other party notice of such change. (Signatures contained on following pages.) 180976 6/22/15 mpg 14 CITY: CITY OF ORONO • By: c ' Lili Tod McMillan,Mayor ='Izr •• 7 Iz -"D ,.:: "q"- �, �� By: LC1J ' s .� .A Jam' ,�,•,..r '; � ssicaLo t • •ministrator 140 ;4, ,s / f7i 1�t�.`=._ DEVELOPER: SOURCE LA_ API.' • LLC By_.._ tAd /i eJ[c'�� sQr �, bp.tcrint name] Its (/ a ne.14vt Pet,4,411 e• By //' [print name] Its G11(-94/("";144#1 t ._ 180976 6/22/15 mpg 15 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ./ / day o 2015 by Lili Tod McMillan and by Jessica Loftus,respectively the Mayor and City Ad mstrat o the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation a •ursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 4 DIANE L.TIEGS l N. , Public f ' NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA • My Commission Expires Jan.31,2016 r 9W 'l£'uersarrdx3 uolseptioj V OS3NNJW-ori nd A&vioN S0311'7 3NVICI STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) `The fore ping instrument was acknowledged before e this /5 day of 2015, by `1(' , . ky - and Pc� t k. &Ij/lm� pectively the d ChRepr,r t,{ nota of Source Laud Capital, LLC, a Minnesota limit li ility company,on behalf of the company.Y _ Notary Pub is AMY JEAN WILLIAMS = ; Notary Public,State of Minnesota _.y l My Commission Expires Erp{: January 31,2018 'AXDRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651)452-5000 SMM 180976 6/22/15 mpg 16 EXHIBIT"A" to Development Contract That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 117, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northeasterly of the centerline of County Road No 151 and Westerly of the centerline of County Road No. 43. The West and North boundary lines of which tract are particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7, indicated by a concrete monument bearing a brass plate marked "Judicial Landmark:" located at said point; thence North along the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7, a distance of 1312 and 15/100 feet to the point of intersection of said line with the North line of said Section 7, indicated by a Sandstone monument located at said point; thence East along the North line of said Section 7, a distance of 2008 and 5/10 feet to the intersection of said lien with the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka, indicated by a concrete monument with a brass plate marked "Judicial Landmark"located at said point. The North fourth of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6,Township 117,Range 23. That part of the West 10 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117,Range 23, lying Southwesterly of the centerline of North Arm Drive,formerly County Road 43; The South Half of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117,Range 23,EXCEPT the North 178.45 feet of the West 500 feet thereof; The North 261 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6,Township 117,Range 23. The East 200 feet of the West 400 feet of the South 203 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117, Range 23, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. Par I: The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, except the West 400 feet of the South 203 feet thereof and except the East 150 feet of the West 550 feet of the South 303 feet thereof, and except that part of the North 52 feet of the South 355 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter which lies between lines bearing North 41 degrees 07 minutes 37 seconds East from the Northwest and Northeast corners of said East 150 feet assuming the west line of said East 150 feet bears North 0 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds West. Par 2: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter except the West 10 acres thereof, lying Southwesterly of the center line of County Road No.43. Par 3: That part of Government Lot 3, lying Southwesterly of the center line of County Road No. 43, except that part thereof embraced in Registered Land Survey No. 1508 all in Section 6, Township 117, Range 23, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. [Torrens property,Certificate of Title No. 1384577] 180976 6/22/15 mpg 17 EXHIBIT "B" to Development Contract Cost Estimates (Attached three sheets) 2.. ha ' If, # ''' ^S j ' Y •. ; Sheet 1 of Nyen Cost Estimate PROJECT:Lakeview CONTRACTOR:Nyen Companies LLC LOCATION:Orono,MN 3480 Co Rd 2i Meyer,MN 55360 PREPARED FOR: Engineer:EVS Contract Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIMNIMIIIIIIMINIIMN Mobilization includes Bond Is 1.00 529,703:00 $29,703.00 Demolition(Clubhouse.Cart Barn,Silo Septic&existing Utditles,Cap Well at Club House) as 1.00 533.700.00 $33,700.00 Remove existing Bit Trail sy 5,260.00 $0.65 $3,412.50 Remove existing Bit Parking sy 6,300.00 $0.85 $4,095.00 Stump Removal Is 1,00 $11,424.00 $11,424.00 Additional Tree removal ea 10.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 Common Excavation(includes V of strip in structural 611 areas,Street&topsoil over exc.hold downs&topsoil respred) cy 60,000.00 52.10 $126,000.00 Subgade Correction Cy 3,000.00 $1.85 55,550:00 Trench Borrow cy 500.00 52.20 51,100.00 Rack Construction Entrance ea 1.00 51;200.00 $1,200.00 Inlet Protection ea 18.00 $110.00 $1,980.00 Silt fence&Maint.(Standard with wood post) If 23,820.00 $1.40 $33.068.00 Erosion Control Blanket 3:1 Cat 3 sy 5,675,00 $1.00 $5,675.00 Erosion Control Blanket Ditch cat 5 sy 26200 $2.00 $524.00 Boulder Wails sf 5,300.00 $25.70 $136,210.00 Seed&Mulch-General Grading HC 12.00 5500.00 $6,000.00 Seed&Mulch-seed nix 310 or 328 ac 1.20 $1,200.00 $1,440.00 Seed&Mulch- wetland buffer mix ac 8.01 $1,500,00 $12,015.00 Existing Ditch Reconstruction and stabilization hr 12.00 $360.00 $4,320.00 Stop Sign ea 6.00 5183.00 $1,098.00 Street Sign ea 6.00 $368:00 $2208.00 BOND SITE GRADING TOTAL $425,722.50 30 feet wide class 5 100%crushed 8" sy 22,761.00 $6.98 5158,871,78 28 feet wide class 5100%crushed 8" sy 3,732.00 $6.98 $28,049.36 8'bit trail includes cease 5 abd fabric(INCLUDES BACKFILL FOE TRAIL) sf 24,146.00 $5.00 $120,730.00 B8-12 Curb and Gutter If 341.00 $20.27 $8,912.07 SPWEB240B Wearing Course 1.5" sy 24,6$4.00 $5.88 3145,024,32 SPNWB230B non wearing Course(INCLUDES SHOULDER BACKFILL) sy 24,664.00 $7.87 $194,105.68 Tack Coat Gal 1,233.00 $2.73 $3,366.09 Fabric Non woven sy 24,664.00 $1.21 529,843.44 2"PVC Conduit If 850.00 51.60 $1,360.00 $886,262.74 Sheet 2 of Nyen Cost Estimate MirtiliiiiMINNOMM 4"HOPE Pipe If 111 $19.80 $2,197.80 10"HOPE Pipe if 66 $31.90 $2;105,40 15"HOPE Pipe If 15 $23.10 $346.50 12"RCP Pipe If 345 130.58 $10,550.10 15"RCP CL 5 If 57.00 $29.40 $1,875.80 18"RCP CL 5 If 915.00 $35.64 $32,610:60 21"RCP CI 3 If 252.00 $35.70 $8,996.40 24"RCP CI 3 If 406.00 $38.85 $15,773.10 4"end section with guard ea 400 $130.00 5520.00 10"'end section with guard ea 4.00 $418.00 $1,672:00 15"end section with guard ea 1.00 $535.00 $535.00 12"RCP Apron win TG ea 4.00 1525.00 12,100.00 12"RCP Pipe w TG ea 6.00 $682.50 $4,095.00 15"RCP Apron wt TG ea 3.00 $735.00 $2.205.00 18"RCP Apron wf TG ea 11.00 $810.00 $8,910.00 21"RCP Apron ea 3.00 $98000 $2,880.00 24"RCP Apron as S 0 $1,102.00 $9,918.00 27"DIA CB ea 4.00 51,365.00 $5,480.00 48"Dla CB es 1.00 $1.890.00 $1,890.00 60"Dia C8 as 2.00 $3,090.00 $6,180.00 Skimmer Struct 48`..<8' ea 6,00 $2.940.00 $17,640.00 Skimmer Struct 12"<2' ea 3.00 $1,210.00 $3.630.00 Slimmer Struct 15"<2 ea 1,00 $1,490.00 $1,490.00 4"clean out<2`Solid Flat LID ea 1.00 $199.00 $199.00 6"clean oul<2'Solid Flat LID ea 21.00 $315.00 $8,615.00 8"clean out'<2'Solid Flat LID ea 1.00 $489.00 $469.00 12"clean out<2'Solid Rat LtD ea 2.00 $483,00 $986.00 4"draintile If 1,699.00 $6.61 $11,230.39 8"DrainUle If 430.00 56,93 $2,979.90 Engineered soils 15"depth sy 2,377.00 $23.10 $54,908.70 Clean Course Agg 8"depth ey 1158.00 $15.20 $2,523.20 Deo mpactionl8"depth sy 830.00 515.00 $12,450.00 Class 3 Rip Rap cy 300.00 584.00 $25,200.00 Class 3 Rip Rap cy 80.00 $84.00 $8,720.00 Rock Check Dams 11.5 cy per ea 12 sy fabric ea 43.00 51,000.00 $43,000,00 STORM SEWER TOTAL $310,841.89 Mobilization&Traffics Control is 1.00 $10,500.00 $10,600.00 Silt fence&Maint If 400.00 $1.60 $640.00 Seed&Mulch ac 0,20 $550.00 $110.00 Emission Blanket .sy 500.00 $1.00 $500.00 18"Seiect Granular borrow 14' .sy 500.00 $18.17 58,085,00 12"Class 5 sy 440.00 $18.17 $7,114.80 3"Wear Course sy 400.00 $15.65 $6,260.00 3"Base Course at 400.00 515.85 56,260.00 Tack Coat gel 20.00 $2.73 $54:80 Type 5 Fabric sy 550.00 $1.68 $924.00 Common Exc cy 500.00 $12.50 $8.250:00 4"Solid Line Whigte Apoxy If 118.00 $1.05 $123.90 4"Dashed Line White Apoxy If 300.00 $0.01 $3.00 STREET CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $46,825.30 Kevin Miller SITE GRADING $425,722.50 STORM SEWER $310,641.89 Nyen Companies LLC STREET CONSTRUCTION $686,282.74 3480 Co Rd 21 TURN LANE $46,825.30 Mayer,MN 55360 TOTAL $1,469,452.43 Phone:952-955-2955 Fax:952-955-3582 Prairie Restoration Cost Estimate Lakeview Golf Course installation: Project set up and mobilization $16,200 She preparation(50 acres @$600/acre)........___......................._ $30,000 • Includes up to 3 herbicide applications • Includes a controlled burn • Includes soil prep as needed Seed and seeding PRI Dry Mix(3 acres IP$3,200/acre) $9,600 Seed and seeding PRI Meek Mix(39 acres @$2,400/acre).. .$309,200 Seed end seeding PRI Wet Mix(6 acres®$4,700/dad.........................$28,200 Seed and seeding PRI Shoreline Mix(1 acres$$5,000/aere) $5,000 Seed and seeding PRI Savanna Mir(1 acres di$3,800/acre)... $3,800 MukhIng as specified(20 acres g1$900/acre) $18,000 Total Install Costs $220,000 ••Options: O 5150 Erosion blanket as needed $1.30/yd Installed 'Additional straw muichbig as needed........................L...............................$900/acre 'Straw wattles as needed $3.35/lin.ft. "Native seedling plugs...._............................. ......................................_ $2.10/plant Installed • To be used to enhance high visibility areas • To be used to help establish water's edge areas • To be used to help establish shady areas • 5,000-15,000 plugs depending on budget s 'Marking trees for removal Woodland work: Buckthorn removal/woodland work(9 acres)._...._..........................._.�r R.D.W.brushing(1500 Un.Ft.)......................_............... ..._...................y .:r Conservation easement Wee removal (132 trees,existing brush pile disposals and new cons.easement areasj.tiJiltil-a". Proposed roadway and CIA de sac tree removals(173 trees) • Initial removal to be completed winter of 201445 Total Woodland Costa >o Management: Annual maintenance estimate: Growing season 2016 $22,500 Growing season 2017._.............._..._....._.................................. $28,750 Growing season 2018.................... . .........,..............._ $29,500 Prescribed bum 2018 'TBD Buckthorn herbicide overspray management: Fall of 2015....... .............„.„.... ..... .......... ................ .....,„$3,555+tax Fallof 2016............................................._...........................................$3,555+tax Fall of 2017............................................... ................ +tax Please note;Annual maintenance is typically billed on a dme and materials basis.Work is billed upon completion until the site's maintenance needs are met(the yearly estimate is not exceeded without prior approval). Also note that the first three years of a restoration are the most crucial In terms of needed maintenance. Typically,costs decrease once the restoration readies a relative level of maturity(after the 3`"or 4's growing season). Total maintenance estimate $90,430 Overall Total Project Cost ---- Includes 3 years of vegetation maintenance • Does not Include arty optional Items(i.e.plugs) • Does not Include fence removal • Amount of erosion control is variable at this time • Shoreline work is variable at this time EXHIBIT "C" to Development Contract Sign Descriptions Lakeview Legacy Park Temporary Sign A temporary sign application for a 3'x 5' sign has already been submitted with a description of the type of sign,its location and the duration of its use(90 days). One change to the description has been made.Instead of producing the sign on printed aluminum,the sign will be printed on 16-18 mil heavy vinyl and stretched across the cedar frame indicated in the application. If necessary the banner will be further supported by a wood backing sheet.The sign has been discussed with Dave Engelman, owner of the UPS store in Wayzata,and they will produce the banner. Park Signs Given the educational focus,as well as the legacy aspect,signage will be very important to the Lakeview Legacy Park. Much of the inspiration for the use of signs has come from the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum as well as Noerenberg Memorial Gardens. Signs are also a key feature in the park plan articulated in Citizen for Lakeview Preservation's 501(c)(3) application and in its fundraising literature. Signs will fall into the following categories: 1) Main Park Sign 2) Interpretive/Educational Signs 3) Tree and planting signs 4) Memorial or dedication signs Main Park Sign At this point SLC and CLP have not finalized a specific design or construction for the main park sign.However it is contemplated that it will be similar to the large sign(approx.8'x 4')approved by Orono for Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park and located along Highway 51. The Lakeview Sign will be similarly placed along North Arm Drive. There will be only one main park sign. Interpretive/Educational Signs Considerable thought and inquiry has gone into the plan for interpretive and educational signs. The current site landscape plan has 7-8 such signs. These signs will all be of one construction aligned with the standards of the National Park Service: 2'x 3'phenolic resin high pressure laminate(10 year warranty) Traditional Style low profile base with 6 in wide aluminum41.0 support posts utilizing 2 in x 4 in aluminum tube with a welded plate at 30 degrees. A local vendor,experienced in this type of design, has been consulted and will produce the signs. 180976 Tree and Planting Sign 1 4 . • Newly planted native trees will be identified with #x, a 6 in x 8 in engraved plaque mounted on a 4 in. x 4 in.cedar post as currently found at the Landscape Arboretum,although with a .k somewhat thicker plaque.In some instances the ,,'' sign will refer to a group of trees. The total �, "4,0 IM.�• number of signs will depend on the final w' _ landscape design but is expected to be in the ;*` ? 44.74.—` range of 10-15. Some specific plantings may be identified with smaller species markers also similar to those found at the Arboretum. Memorial and Dedication Signs As a legacy park,there will opportunities for donors to honor specific individuals,pets,or events as is also common at the Arboretum.The following signs are anticipated: Stone Benches—There will be 5-6 benches , engraved on one side,as depicted in this photo: e, Engraved Pavers -An area of engraved pavers,either cut into the asphalt "' MirrPMltl1! trail or surrounding a possible small shelter is planned. The initial area will " ' ' be the equivalent of a 10 ft x 10 ft area. Pavers will be composed of an __ t e , environmentally-friendly recycle product that can be laser cut and will be • 'J either 4 in x 8 in or 8 in x 8 in. tll•wK WW1 urstRUILIAMIOVI .1 :r wa ntmae ••� -td ltlta m+t .. . [e1Cr rrrc:rav, Bronze Plaques— One or two plaques for specific larger donations maybe installed on stones in a manner similar to the following '.�4 k Y 4 M* example from the arboretum. The size would be dependent on the .- "°" � � ;�. +�•. specific usage. =tiY ,' _ w g IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono,Minnesota 55356 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of$ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 , of (Name of Bank) "; — = b)Be accompanied by an affidavit signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Orono certifying that is in default of the Development Contract with the City of Orono and that five(5)business days prior written notice has been given by the City to the Developer with respect to the existence of such default,and such default has not been cured. c)Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) ,on or before 4:00 p.m.on November 30,2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless,at least forty-five(45) days prior to the next annual renewal date(which shall be November 30 of each year),the Bank delivers written notice to the Orono City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of,or cancel,this Letter of Credit.Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail,postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S.Mail,at least forty-five(45)days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Orono City Administrator,Orono City Hall,2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota 55356, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified,or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein,This Letter of Credit is not assignable.This is not a Notation Letter of Credit.More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits,International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. This agreement shall be construed and interpreted under Minnesota Law. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: Its 180976 6/22/15 mpg 18 A CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE �2(20D5"") THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER rCiOOnNtTACT Donna Martin Christensen Group Insurance PH NN Est): (952)653-1000 Iii No 653-1101 11100 Bran Road West nooRESS;dmartin@christensengroup.com INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC S Minnetonka MN 55343 INsuRERA:Cincinnati Insurance Company 10677 INSURED INSURER B: Source Land Development Inc INSURER C: 18215 45th Ave N, Suite D INSURER D: INSURER E: Plymouth MN 55446 INSURERF: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:15/16 Liability Master REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE AODL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER IMMIDDIYYYY) (MM/DDIYYYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGETO RENTED PREEMISES(Ea occurrence) $ 500,000 A CLAIMS-MADE I X I OCCUR SNP 0337213 7/8/2015 7/8/2016 MECEXP(Anyoneperson) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $ 2,000,000 X POLICY71 PRO- — - IFCT 1 1 LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT lEa accident) $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Pec person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY Pec accident $ AUTOS AUTOS ( ) HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE _ AUTOS (Per accident) $ I $ X UMBRELLA UAB —X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 DED RETENTIONS SNP 0337213 7/8/2015 7/B/2016 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y I N TORY I IMITS ER _ ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE EL EACH ACCIDENT $ OFF10ERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? N I A (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,If mare space Is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Orono ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE [ Brandon Perkins/MH ,-- -1 ACORD 25(2010/05) ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. INS025!?mnnEI of Thn ARr1Rrl name and!non arm ranicfcmri marks of ACrlgil • CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend,extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. PROJECT: Llama t C Yy O Old Q_. CERTIFICATE HOLDER&ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Orono ADDRESS: ARCH/ENGR: INSURED: ADDRESS: AGENT: ADDRESS: WORKERS'COMPENSATION COVERAGE POLICY# EFFECTIVE DATE / / EXPIRATION DATE / / INSURANCE COMPANY: COVERAGE-Workers'Compensation,Statutory.Employers'Liability Limit $ Each Accident $ Disease Policy Limit $ Disease Employee Limit ($500,000 Policy limit applies to both accident and disease) GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY# EFFECTIVE DATE / / EXPIRATION DATE / / INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Claims Made ( )Occurrence ( }Owner's&Contractors Protective ( )Other LIMITS: General Aggregate Limit(Other Than Products-Completed Operations) Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit Personal&Advertising Injury Limit Each Occurrence $ 180976 6/22/15 mpg 19 COVERAGE PROVIDED Operations of Contractor: Yes No Government Immunity is Waived Yes No Operations of Sub-Contractor(Contingent): Yes No Property Damage Liability Includes Does Personal Injury Include Damage Due to Blasting Yes No Claims Related to Employment: Yes No _ Damage Due to Collapse Yes No Completed Operations/Products: Yes No Damage To Underground Facilities Yes No Contractual Liability(Broad Form): Yes No Broad Form Property Damage Yes No EXCEPTIONS: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICY# EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: / / INSURANCE COMPANY: ()Any Auto ()All Owned Autos ()Scheduled Autos ()Hired Autos ()Non-Owned Autos LIMITS: Bodily Injury $ Each Person/$ Each Occurrence OR Combined Single Limit$ Property Damage$ Each Occurrence UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY# EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: / / INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage $ Each Occurrence $ Aggregate COVERAGE PROVIDED; Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employers'Liability,General Liability,and Automobile Liability: Yes No Are any deductibles applicable to bodily injury or property damage on any of the above coverages? Yes No If So,List Amount$ AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE: Yes No Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof,the issuing company will mail 30 days notice to the parties to whom this certificate is issued. Dated at: On: By: MN License# Authorized Insurance Representative 180976 6/22/15 mpg 20 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT,INC., a South Dakota corporation, fee owner of all or part of the subject property,the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract,affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by it. Dated this 2D day of August,2015. SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT,INC. By: Patrick HI r-___. Its Chief Financial Officer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of August,2015, by Patrick Hiller,the Chief Financial Officer of Source Land Development,Inc., a South Dakota corporation,on behalf of said corporation. AMY JEAN WILLIAMS Notary 'ublic r + Notary Public,State of Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31.2018 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road,#290 Eagan,Minnesota 55121 (651)452-5000 SMM/jmo 180976 21 Transfer Entered Aug 25, 2015 11:32 AM II 111 I 11111 I I 111 Doc No T05284392 Hennepin County, Minnesota Mark Chapin Certified, filed and/or recorded on County Auditor and Treasurer Aug 25, 2015 11:32 AM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 96 Pkg ID 1284495C Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1409611 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. t (reserved for recording information) GRANT OF PERMANENT FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR WETLANDS This Grant of Permanent Flowage and Conservation Easement and Restrictive Covenant for Wetlands(the "Agreement")made this 114 ' day of , 2015,by SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT,INC.,a South Dakota corporation(" raptor"), in favor of the CITY OF ORONO,a Minnesota municipal corporation("City"). WITNESSETH: The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration paid by the City,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,hereby creates and grants unto the City a permanent easement for wetland flowage and conservation purposes over,under,on and across the land within the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, which is legally described on Exhibit"A" attached hereto(the"Easement Premises"),all as set forth in this Agreement. The Easement Premises is part of residential community within the City of Orono, Minnesota(the"City"), known as "Lakeview" (the "Community"). The Community is comprised of all of the real property within the plat of LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,Hennepin County,Minnesota(the "Plat"). The Grantor is the owner of Easement Premises and all of the other real property within the Plat, The Community is intended to consist of forty-six single family residential home lots(individually a"Lot," and collectively the"Lots"), and related common elements(the"Common Elements"), all being subject to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions of Lakeview(the "Declaration") to be recorded against all of the real property within the Plat in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Community will be administered and operated by Lakeview Owners Association(the "Association"),a Minnesota nonprofit corporation; The Grantor, its successors and assigns,hereby covenants and agrees as follows: 804979.v4 } 1. Prohibited and Permitted Uses. That the following are prohibited in perpetuity within the Easement Premises, except by consent of the City or as otherwise noted in this Agreement or set forth in the Declaration: A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything, including buildings, structures, walkways,fences, retaining walls, fireplaces, clothes line poles,playground equipment,roads, hardcover of any kind,underground utility lines and distribution equipment,light poles,traffic signals, traffic regulatory signs, mailboxes; except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; 2)docks or boardwalks when allowed by City ordinance and under a valid City permit; 3)retaining walls when allowed by City ordinance and under a valid City permit; and 4)a private sewage treatment system (otherwise known as a septic system) serving a Lot(including, without limitation, a holding tank, a drain field,meters, a lift station, piping,pumps, and all other related apparatus and related improvements (collectively,the"Sewage Treatment System")). Creation and maintenance of non-hardcover walking paths may be allowed. B. Cutting,mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting, destroying or removing trees greater than four inches in diameter, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance; as a part of an approved vegetation management plan; and, to maintain,repair and reconstruct any stormwater ponds and facilities within the Easement Premises. Grantor may remove brush, diseased or dead trees of any size, buckthorn and noxious weeds. C. Excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging,mining or removal of earth, loam,peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free roaming of domestic animals(i.e.horses, sheep, chickens, etc.) E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers,whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. 1. The application of herbicides,pesticides,and insecticides,except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. J. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the scenic beauty, vegetation,and wildlife. 804979.v4 2 In addition to the provisions in said subsections A through and K,above, and to the extent not in conflict with those provisions,no alteration, change,modification, installation, or construction, of any type or nature,whether temporary or permanent, structural, aesthetic, or otherwise(collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Alterations"), shall occur on or within the Easement Premises unless and until the Alterations are approved by the Association(or an architectural committee established by the Association)pursuant to the terms of the Declaration;provided,that any portion of a Sewage Treatment System within a Lot shall be maintained,repaired, and replaced by the owner(s)of the Lot as set forth in the Declaration(and each such owner has the right to perform such maintenance,repair, and replacement(as well as does the Association in the event such maintenance,repair, and replacement is not properly performed by such owner(s)). 2. Prohibition of Sewage Treatment System in Wetland Area. No Sewage Treatment System shall be located within the wetland area depicted on the Plat. 3. Rights of the City. Grantor,its successors and assigns,further grants to the City the affirmative right,but not the obligation,to do the following on the Easement Premises: A. Preserve,improve, and enhance the slope,trees,vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation,by changing the contour of the land,and by planting trees or other vegetation. B. Enter upon the Easement Premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 4. Reservation of Rights of and by Grantor. Grantor reserves for itself and for its successors and assigns and its invitees, and for the Association and for the owners and occupants of the Lots (and their families, visitors, and invitees), the right to enter upon the Easement Premises and to do and perform on the Easement Premises such acts as are not inconsistent with the easement rights granted to the City herein. Such uses shall be deemed to include,but not be limited to,planting of trees,flowers, and other vegetation consistent with a conservation easement;walking along trails and paths;bird watching; the study of nature; and all other acts of a similar nature or purpose. In addition to the provisions of this Section 4,or any other provision in this Agreement, and if not in conflict with any such provision(s),no actions or activities by any person on or within the Easement Premises shall violate the provisions of the Declaration or the Association's Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, or Rules and Regulations(all as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time). 5. Grant of Flowage Easement. Grantor hereby grants, gifts, quit claims and conveys to the City a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Easement Premises,but not to the detriment of the Lots, the Common Elements,the Association,or the owners or occupants of the Lots. 804979.v4 3 6. No Public Interest. Nothing contained herein or the dedication in the Plat shall be construed as creating any use rights in the general public or as dedicating for public use any portion of the Easement Premises, except as expressly described in this Agreement. 7, Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument signed by the City and the Grantor, or its respective successors and assigns in interest to the Easement Premises. 8. Representations. Grantor hereby represents to the City that,to the best knowledge of Grantor, Grantor is not aware of any mortgage or ownership interests in the Easement Premises other than the mortgages set forth in the Mortgage Holder Consents attached hereto and Grantor's interest in the Easement Premises. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF,the Grantor hereto has executed this Agreement effective as of the day and year set forth above. GRANTOR: SOURCE L, I D ' OPMENT, INC. / ' ,./k By Its Presi CX STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) OT e foregoing instrument was ackno_ ledged before me this ' i day of NU , 2015, by J-e- 1? f rz4,k- the frtS) of Sourc' Land Development, Inc. (the "DadTeloper'°°), a South Dakota corporation, on behalf of the corp • �r— — �,., �� ABY JEAN UYII�IAMS ;'•„ Notary ku4tk,Stale of Minnesota Nly„ missbn Expires 4 fy31,2018 �N! .411 .1//\. , .. Notary Pub is INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 612 452-5000 SMM 804979.v4 4 EXHIBIT"A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR WETLANDS See attached 9 pages 40 0 fif 804979.v4 5 An Easement for flowage and conservation over, under and across the following described properties: EASEMENT PARCEL A That part of Lots 1, through 8, 11, 12, and 14, Block 1 of LAKEVIEW OF ORONO, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2;thence easterly on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds East,along the north line of said Lot 2 and Lot 1 a distance of 637.94 feet;thence South 30 degrees 30 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 213.85 feet;thence South 68 degrees 10 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 65.74 feet;thence South 83 degrees 51 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 331 12 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 1;thence southwesterly a distance of 47.85 feet along the easterly line of said Lot 1 being a non-tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 315.00 feet,a central angle of 8 degrees 42 minutes 13 seconds and a chord that bears South 34 degrees 53 minutes 55 seconds West to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 1;thence of South 39 degrees 15 minutes 01 seconds West,tangent to said curve, along the easterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 51.71 feet;thence North 85 degrees 50 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 291.44 feet; thence North 67 degrees 18 minutes 07 minutes West a distance of 86.69 feet;thence South 20 degrees 50 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 228.19 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence South 53 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 264.14 feet;thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 577.03 feet;thence South 40 degrees 28 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 252.50 feet;thence South 57 degrees 20 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 243.31 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 8;thence South 81 degrees 29 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 283.40 feet;thence North 41 degrees 46 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 119.95 feet; thence North 18 degrees 59 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 164.38 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 8;thence North 05 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 211.98 feet;thence North 33 degrees 55 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 138,22 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 11; thence South 57 degrees 38 minutes 13 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 11 a distance of 169.51 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 11;thence South 32 degrees 21 minutes 47 seconds West, along the easterly line of said Lot 11 a distance of 32.27 feet;thence southwesterly a distance of 110.68 feet along a tangential curve concave to the east having a radius of 200.00 feet and central angle of 31 degrees 42 minutes 29 seconds;thence of South 0 degrees 38 minutes 17 seconds West,tangent to last said curve, along the easterly line of said Lot 11 and Lot 12 a distance of 208.32 feet;thence southerly a distance of 25.72 feet along a tangential curve concave to the east having a radius of 500.01 feet and a central angle of 2 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds;thence South 54 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 292.70 feet; thence South 81 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 354.16 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 14; thence North 0 degrees 39 minutes 19 seconds East,along the westerly line of said Lot 14 a distance of 80.84 feet to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 14;thence North 88 degrees 48 minutes 45 seconds West,along the southerly line of said Lot 7 and Lot 6 a distance of 440.02 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 6;thence North 0 degrees 39 minutes 17 seconds East, along the westerly line of said Block 1 a distance of 1625.67 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Together with: EASEMENT PARCEL B That part of Lots 9, 10,and 11, Block 1 of said LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 10;thence South 2 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the easterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 67.86 feet; thence continue southerly along said easterly line of Lot 10 and Lot 11 a distance of 215.80 feet along a tangential curve concave to the east having a radius of 225.00 feet and a central angle of 54 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds;thence South 42 degrees 13 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 196.10 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 9;thence North 43 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 146.97 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 9;thence North 12 degrees 30 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 289.95 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 10;thence North 87 degrees 16 minutes 24 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 62.41 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Together with: EASEMENT PARCEL C That part of Lots 15 through 21, Block 1; Lots 1 through 3, Block 2; and OUTLOT B of said LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 15;thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the westerly line of said Lot 15 a distance of 203.17 feet;thence South 41 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 174.44 feet;thence South 81 degrees 38 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 221.99 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 16;thence North 83 degrees 34 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 236.00 feet;thence North 62 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 165.32 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 16;thence North 29 degrees 37 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 316.84 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 17;thence North 20 degrees 55 minutes 39 seconds West a distance of 343.81 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 18;thence North 1 degree 52 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 99.53 feet;thence North 21 degrees 08 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 228.29 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 19;thence southeasterly a distance of 319.55 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 19 on a non-tangential curve,concave to the South, having a radius of 400.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 46 minutes 14 seconds and a chord that bears South 30 degrees 14 minutes 08 seconds East;thence southeasterly a distance of 490.54 feet along a tangential reverse curve concave to the east having a radius of 590.00 feet and a central angle of 47 degrees 38 minutes 13 seconds;thence South 19 degrees 02 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 386.21 feet; thence South 66 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 195.17 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 20;thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 149.05 feet;thence North 2 degrees 30 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 58.27 feet; thence South 86 degrees 34 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 29.91 feet; thence North 22 degrees 06 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 139.35 feet;thence North 53 degrees 41 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 132.46 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 21; thence South 63 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 2,said OUTLOT A and said Lot 1,a distance of 164.65 feet;thence southeasterly a distance of 142.38 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 865.00 feet and a central angle of 9 degrees 25 minutes 52 seconds;thence South 0 degrees 48 minutes 14 seconds West a distance of 361.45 feet;thence North 87 degrees 04 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 122.59 feet; thence North 45 degrees 16 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 69.52 feet;thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 540.27 feet; thence South 8 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds West,along the east line of said Lot 3,a distance of 11.21 feet to a corner of said Lot 3;thence southerly a distance of 36.49 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 189.00 feet and a central angle of 11 degrees 03 minutes 45 seconds; thence South 19 degrees 25 minutes 49 seconds West,along the easterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 135.57 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 3 and the northerly right of way line of West Branch Road;thence westerly a distance of 57.06 feet along said right of way line on a non-tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 1004.93 feet,a central angle of 3 degrees 15 minutes 11 seconds and a chord that bears North 86 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds West;thence North 88 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds West,tangent to said last curve, along said right of way line, a distance of 1107.76 feet to the southwesterly corner of said OUTLOT B;thence North 0 degrees 06 minutes 54 seconds East, along the westerly line of said OUTLOT B a distance of 253.12 feet;thence North 41 degrees 19 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 67.31 feet to a corner of said Lot 21;thence North 88 degrees 03 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 150.07 feet;thence South 41 degrees 19 minutes 24 seconds West, along the easterly line of said Lot 20 a distance of 67.31 feet; thence South 0 degrees 06 minutes 59 seconds West along the easterly line of Lot 20,a distance of 253.12 feet to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 20;thence North 88 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds West, along the south line of said Lot 20 a distance of 200.10 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 20; thence North 0 degrees 15 minutes 26 seconds East,along the westerly line of said Lot 20 a distance of 153.07 feet;thence North 88 degrees 05 minutes 33 seconds West, along the south line of said Lot 17 a distance of 200.10 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 17;thence North 0 degrees 06 minutes 59 seconds East,along the west line of said Lot 17 a distance of 209.32 feet to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 16;thence North 88 degrees 34 minutes 15 seconds West, along the south line of said Lot 16 and Lot 15, a distance of 670.78 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating Together with: EASEMENT PARCEL D That part of Lot 1 through Lot 22, Block 3 and OUTLOT A of said LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 19; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 19, a distance of 218.89 feet to the point of beginning;thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds East,along said northerly line of said Lot 19 a distance of 28.29 feet;thence easterly a distance of 240.18 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 281.35 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds;thence South 41 degrees 07 minutes 03 seconds East, tangent to said curve,along the northerly line of said Lot 17 and Lot 20 a distance of 257.697 feet; thence South 49 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 130.71 feet;thence South 3 degrees 40 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 363.73 feet;thence South 38 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 219.29 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 21;thence South 60 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 231.50 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 22; thence South 45 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds West, along the easterly line of said Lot 22 a distance of 39.13 feet to the most westerly corner OUTLOT I,thence South 50 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds East along the northerly line of OUTLOT A 84.00 feet;thence South 66 degrees 12 minutes 39 seconds East, along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 32.51 feet;thence South 61 degrees 10 minutes 28 seconds East, along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 205.02 feet;thence South 66 degrees 28 minutes 28 seconds East, along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 191.90 feet;thence South 50 degrees 09 minutes 04 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A e of 86.02 feet; thence North 78 degrees 23 minutes 46 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A 34.87 feet;thence South 63 degrees 05 minutes 34 seconds East, along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A 25.49 feet;thence South 24 degrees 51 minutes 08 seconds East, along the easterly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 145.02 feet;thence South 15 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East, along the easterly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 134.44 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 8;thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8 a distance of 271.08 feet to the northeast corner said Lot 8;thence South 24 degrees 11 minutes 18 seconds West,along the easterly line of said Lot 8 a distance of 124.58 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 7;thence South 40 degrees 01 minutes 27 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 7 a distance of 131.63 feet;thence South 78 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 6 a distance of 236.54 feet;thence North 24 degrees 11 minutes 03 seconds East,along a northwesterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 109.96 feet;thence South 65 degrees 39 minutes 42 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 5, a distance of 123.30 feet;thence southeasterly a distance of 213.89, along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 297.65 feet and a central angle of 41 degrees 10 minutes 22 seconds;thence South 24 degrees 29 minutes 20 seconds East, along the easterly line of said Lot 4 and Lot 3 a distance of 722.04 feet;thence southerly a distance of 316.26 feet along the easterly line of said Lot 2,on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 253.48 feet and central angle of 71 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds;thence South 46 degrees 59 minutes 48 seconds West,along the southeasterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 57.80 feet to the most southerly corner of said Lot 2;thence northwesterly a distance of 608.14 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 1004.93 feet, a central angle of 34 degrees 40 minutes 22 seconds and a chord that bears North 62 degrees 27 minutes 45 seconds West,to the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3;thence North 4 degrees 58 minutes 44 seconds East,along the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 150.09 feet; thence North 8 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds East, along the westerly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 11.72 feet; thence South 57 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 271.96 feet; thence North 83 degrees 38 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 130.19 feet; thence North 21 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 267.77 feet;thence North 27 degrees 08 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 271.63 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 3;thence North 40 degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 272.83 feet to the westerly line of Lot 4;thence North 77 degrees 13 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 197.14 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 5;thence North 84 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 358.64 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 7; thence North 79 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 403.54 feet; thence South 27 degrees 47 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 259.89 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 9;thence North 63 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West,along the southerly line of said Lot 9 and Lot 10 a distance of 154.56 feet;thence North 20 degrees 50 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 218.75 feet; thence North 57 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 229.65 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 10;thence North 73 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds West a distance of 203.48 feet; thence South 32 degrees 20 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 198.79 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 11; thence northwesterly a distance of 169.00 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 540.00 feet, a central angle of 17 degrees 55 minutes 52 seconds and a chord that bears North 35 degrees 07 minutes 36 seconds West;thence North 63 degrees 08 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 155.28 feet;thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 320.76 feet to the northerly line of Lot 12;thence North 53 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds West distance of 214.54 feet;thence South 57 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 171.85 feet to the westerly line of Lot 13;thence northwesterly a distance of 102.49 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 450.00 feet,a central angle of 13 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds and a chord that bears North 51 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds West;thence North 57 degrees 38 minutes 13 seconds West,tangent to last said curve, along the southerly line of said Lot 14 and Lot 15 a distance of 413.68 feet; thence northwesterly a distance of 167.84 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 175.00 feet and central angle of 54 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds;thence North 02 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds West,along the westerly line of said Lot 15, a distance of 67.86 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 15;thence North 87 seconds 19 minutes 12 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 15,a distance of 162.06 feet;thence easterly a distance of 8.44 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 190.00 feet and central angle of 2 degrees 32 minutes 37 seconds;thence South 6 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 198.95 feet;thence South 57 degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 263.72 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 15;thence South 80 degrees 30 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 175.91 feet;thence North 46 degrees 14 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 90.79;thence North 2 degrees 57 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 375.89 feet;thence North 47 degrees 33 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 169.21 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 16;thence North 79 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 481.41 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 18;thence northeasterly a distance of 19,48 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 225.00 feet and central angle of 4 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds and a chord that bears North 36 degrees 46 minutes 12 seconds East;thence North 39 degrees 15 minutes 01 seconds East,tangent to last said curve,along the westerly line of said Lot 18 a distance of 107.80 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 18;thence northeasterly a distance of 19.23 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 365.00 feet and central angle of 3 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds;thence South 78 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 185.02 feet;thence North 17 degrees 45 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 355.42 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. 4w W iA 1 '§:r. r IV- 217. j,,/4j ' W I J CC W V/2' iii --- < ‘,41- <-<\, ap_ F-- ',,)' ) ;iii ---,. h i_�111 _ a Z al Jel ii ' ., 1 � i - w iii _'�I.-- ' 'N. '1F--- < A 1 ri i .,,Ly.,., —....11\v, fill 17, _a Q . IL ., .. • -- .�Mr• -- > f� c 2n } ! !lE 84111 '. 11L L1 l'i., 14'1 Li.!3RI9iIi. Lij -- 0 , 1 lijllljEgiit�°Ili lies= a1 j iR11i8 gbn 111 galie8*1Is•�i1!11 11i" il1I111p O �i� 1' }C�• .e1. `n Caa j•11isiikillill.”i U 1.111 pL.jja�' ,fo ■„1f pS 011D.311 i491111i f.p�1 11,a}i1 ;11a1a11111Rn1aj1'1 QEF t 1 a.s Lopot 11101P°111110 11„i aLFl:,a: 0... 10.41 b3% l IlgillE1l;2i1lif 111 1P°111110111r4 11 1E1 c 11:0 n918Ajfnil$ll,Dea„j11.:t.x a^■p i^-b 13 cu o I 111110-1/41 .)113 i� iii..01111'1 ;1;l. jiEi1n i is# i bilisii .11 iii. .1111 il;iiililii i1i21aiiif 1. , 1 1_ 1!I!1IjDI11i1jJtIJjiJJjhiiiiII!It a/ 1L1ej ipil ial p i B! a = 7 xEy 'Ri1p 6, i;liJJj 1 1iib1� aeaDbljl-�, ■�-L1Q � 9■b°j��i'1gpb�jij6;B;fx`1sjL�iL Lab "n 1�_6 °lpL��iL�X11)ijjil� 1b i1 1 allh e i y IiIUIIiiiiiiiiI 9bflyE�p�jR � Q p !£ A !� }jj g.o 1 i11 i�ap s.41. k .4 xlp'°11i"'1- 5 ii ljl' ej^� j :b al J11•■b .. iiib 1 npa �.■��'-sD!J F�ijj 11M1si } b- OAPL J-{11 'il L= lVtigi1� P Fl i i9L7 jj jno^i ■ E � J"aL�iiAl1■ 9' L_-■w 1 g` H b ��-'�lf�n Ae b ■E■ x p �� p k is 7 e fS■ ®^1 1 1 ij-51'_ sF z_ x1 ! 1;j�-' ~' r1,1 9 p1. gl;j1 ml i 43 b` b 9 a j 1• j j' 9�1:a !1111' �• r C � a � 9 9p 1 L c e n Rg. �-� 2.. LI_em ; ' i "Iii 11- 0, ■ RLib 7Y011 sl l 1�•ji 1 'ae.7e. -11�■11' bL a.li- itp FRpa 1 9 9j���t€o !€�� il��bL Fig bl�n�lE1* , s le;j 1jjlbb y . .jpCF y�.jJ�j j1�j � 111�]i�r8g'� jal�5 11 a i• 1` j 1� i li nli 1!1B llii i1 l R 11 1111 x; �DiLai 1bk-QL11111114b! p �..�� �_� ��+a1ltij_y�i i'i !! 1� � $_ � 5p �. ��g 3( � e 1b] E e RR:a" !s F• Rb4121 i `1 1 r 1a L b1 Lit r 9I "1.04"41"1102810• 0a15 11.1^ j9 1 L' JBj 9S a e llARlna7lQi i;p �1 r�i111 �1A BD � b� jl Q � lo`t A 9: 3 9 i � �� 11 Li_ i lifflitpllisiiii1if1111;11111;Si14iiii ; 111 IEP6IIMAMMillifliAi;FI1fillftliiimillialiisi"11ii-1 pr ! L i L L b e pipit” ii.i'x - 11 11 1 7 L1 e4'� A"i ! , 0.1° 1811p n ! A a R 111.1.1111" p c b ■ 9 � � ly a � i !3D b � � ■� �J b i aa�nR j � jjA !! � j � � !e gq` Lj t i � ! a� ppbas vs$ W d 1141,111411/41411111111i11;11 f i ] ib1 e.Yi!- . A•j x z3 isOg ii ES 1 ,R pp � �� 1 i iglli �D11 P la^1 I i1a11 �ii1 > 1j iL A:ii10-11.'SaCibiise bC'pa"bbIDL ..b eint98j, 3 Oi��jR bR : �` �y�! W 1 mo=PTIt iii111111111;TIPIIIiii; � seopitf 3 i ill. j.. 110AR20.: ! n 11 1P58aat ' Dl,ia p9b e # ji3 b`'Si! 11 jp9sfi " P ap iij9iej1j 1^1bs i1 l ii �111iJ•i1 tiij,yg 1j 1!l. 1,i4 Itg,' ij 1`lqi r s gig iii X1111111 a • d b,. �yi■ /�i^ bq■i111ap11041�9 i1..1� b 3 i•1fb al§1 1S B1Aii 111A 1 ��rr �! 1 11 3 EDCippa fl 1 j'A i bi } l W x 1 01 11 x--'-.I. I ;J ! 1 J j i i11� j j_a.= b j� bxL S� D 1 ill `! bi!p� E � �i■_ 3.L ! � int s !E ( ! E ■ (jF �1, "e` 5T1 iij!.:; l b 1xirvsj"919 j - p 1j- 1jj' ■ . ili sif111 x-1i xi r`bi 01 1/,. Aiiiiiiiio iAlca_iel • ! i1�9�-�i,el 1.1 a•ctiF l...f �b 1■^EQR � 1e 10 nAl! j1! �191j'� s 8.jew• 9n1�1!1 1 i�...1j'!"1ja ! i111� jg`ll� ¢:R13'8 E! i■!i111; jljb _1...D1 111°1 s�ji€-10'1 A11E141 D t ff a ij 1Ef b ■ ii ! a ; 9jll1ija_• 11...1111; 1,100.4 192= 1 g a 1■j jb�1 1 .8118•" xiii IIIII1p b b 9 e CQ L AD' t- Q4 D1 a 'JjEb Ry■i !!e"'L L biilLb-a1 rab �pS�pj; 95 I!!!!jlbRR :1' a.pljs 21 LA ii`i i 1 91jj �� �_ ll# i2. Al i l -a I1iai1i } i 719IIfilt� 1 I11 oil Ill 911111:811 ! LAKEVIEW OF ORONO- FLOWAGE and CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREAS o L nuraons,m�It, L .,„ ,�i 1 5--0, IG f-iiouoc+xrwrmEaE�r, —T_ q NORTH ARM DRIVE a I-- +- mama s. �� NORTH ARM ESTATES 2 ram ear sr um • • • \ -F-7,71— • ,, , •.E \\- i y iXO.'LnEO A. Uvt . r❑• f_i 44 FM MEOtorj-, 0 Ypp)4I \� j-- f u • LOT \ j... LOT /) � �YNN•J • Jsm W, i WEM1I,LJ ` JO'n'4E j 1 —7_1 'l - •—.—'--a.°�b'ii-�-•--. L.,E.;Erne. 1 I ., I) fly -ARCEL .i ---7"'1::"'"` f -•1 oF,m"'-' yC)P \\�L?i i, 4°'1r``-1Tfrew`•-•-.-. 4A- _.-.-°ro•a,f / ,•/ �: I \ /.a Lu in EASEMENT if S: EblLEEO'-�• .d$ - �°ry E4SEME 11111 l�,� yy \ k.,\ i PARCELA J85 -� '-- _�.-- i p \ ��r / / )F n i - P CELS i I lit_ \ �`� / /. L0T2 �ewFNEnad - Y L / ` ,/ _ s•t`' W` LOT 87 i / ' --'`� `�,�mir CIE Lor IS LOT 17 '.. • \ / .-J. Di W ' /IF NnrmL I ‘ ` II..1 • \ / - '''‘P h, oF,ar's.-xLr tea+ •ii."'TI•;••••. I i m. 1�%, �J' , I earls ❑ (�' LOT 9 J- i ' �,'d i !I�'�^",o y \\ / ---- Lu a .M.,q` gam OL• P. LOT18 ! • 'I aRF,ianrii-. • w ` / Rp '"fit 2 /ft ovim,e �jf •Cm L''' tOP ior u I� t� I l+ i ,'., ki ,. RIX w,E- 14\►7 !Bp ip+ S° +g 1 .�.•' _ OF ICC., \ j XE LOT 4 • O >!! 9 I , .,6� CRAM=SCALE --'_1 z i o Jam' LOT 10 #j •4 '' i LOT 75 �,,,a r,,,e al i 'ay. : j4 sY rsFO,mlaLvuEE Lm,E �I i I • �� / O 1 l c'k 1,}. Nt. • S�• `,ar is ILOT 14 nEnxa I ) �. •.i` :LbT22 (•NG) -I -t i i (�� % .. BLOCKi 37 :E, NT `mat ii F-I a 1 , I • "a'^•+enE,E� i/ '�,y, ''. ` I r! t - •R'- D '-.. OUTLOT I in LEGEND C]I��'n inE„ALoj i 'tk\ ie. ,� ,'.�45, ` 4.EFa �i ! a,r sL•srw r •n,r+cr®,Nnauon,NertFanO ��I� t I f LOTS • t`4.*,y'�, ,�.,r / / '�'► ,uF� ,�� I • • SWOT T .ss LneeL® n / • r o envnnuFEnzusdme- _ -f f LOT I? ,nvENE-/ % am ��. OF yC ' • •`-rrm sr tram E,nrEEnaul LOOLIBrtsCTW (•�O n 111 ff MUNE-,fi - aF tar„ i . vw:n•u,o\ , <s , r`" ,y{f� �4\`I LOT 13 a MOTTO vslnorl _-T I i= ,+ i LOT 1t ate i ,p �,r ° o�w,vF.xNL>-, / fa- i :`7 l ,r .� n��NE-/ aF 1S L'S 1 l LS + Y9 /5... rNNEi Z.� -�' a -ci 1 1 f , 1 /• lory .. - - - EdEOFaa wE°wc.wm �.)Is r i , �'. Lars % • i r EASEMENT / - . - : -1 t s i i U 1- ---1-----' --- ----- __ 1 NnrLnE $. .., PARCEL D Loll 11 /11,ME r- 1• ,,,,,,,_„---- 1 "- £\ 4';•$ S. ..�•_O N_ I ` `' N7 E 8/ aru J ` $t ENT t I �`- ell. '�.� BLOCK I'I LOTS =, •SEMENT aEoE. j � 0'-_4.,. LOT 1z i . I OF 11.00(1 S .• ' E E.�1 i .•ARCEL A 'F�,Ee..1 ?�I • .d. --mrmF_ 41 { I E , _xvr I PARCEL A •.L,COM I / �' 1 H1ss�1 _ vEnvo 1i -- "-'��1 '-2, 'r°FOOT,. !df o°' I \ om 'P��t�` 8 1 OF LQ,6 • LOT 1z • :`..A //,•-. LOCK I I • NVE.pF — _ .�_------ !Lorts�s°i�.�b � .° i� 4"pa°'w'- 3 t 1 • -6LTlNE --•�'•-•-�. p ' j/'� 451i/ LOT F.:' O � ® ' • I • 11 aS, ;�pEpO,f,arL„E `44 •�� • -WlfICLLY maiOF LOT 1 I 39 �g��s. I LOT 14 .`° I 1 r ) row=w,a IauarENI.s 1 FOrOPOwrHru 1.fi nn I ; r LOT t7 o NNE Lor to; I SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS LAKEVIEW OF ORONO-, FLOWAGE and CONSERVATIONmEASEMENT AREAS SEMENT sl:;s 7 ,<;.----1 y \`p.\ \ j ,} I .._._ I i PARCEL �'/,;EMU I'_ ___-� :s�p� \ ,, �\ \ ¢s3`-` �• �-_ ._anr 6 �. \ \ `,+\ \ d�,_. 80`1 " '•,I :� LOT 12 Tv t L g • ., lleeTIAN: , �� ....- --..4. •;-- -_ _- _ •/----�_\ \ �1 LOT 16 9� r♦rlY& . :, iF `•' w i—.— • 3�` _ Y..,.EApos+r E....., , \1_ ,�' LOT 11 ,'/♦.• \'1/4. --wmmrEE,EI §11 \ 1 1 \r / ®+...� awT,. , '� • LOT 14 3 LOT 13 I L' 1' f - \ ,WEr,E,a.LINE LOT 10/ —hor.__' — "�— — _ ' ! II I I` xin a i s / oo,m,u i I/l i r-•R I OUTLOT C .` / / • ;�.• Of /, (♦ �. E' —i O i i LAT 3E _A — I a4 • r\ /' is �' ` • j I.♦ F / w.,,EE--- — �I {, j; �, / Edr,E OF LOT • I` , 1 wL.,.E \ i:-CIa],:r CC.' (/17 r:•[.'.•-- J C LO,In y!;.': �,t"t4 maw,. d%' ,• a l ♦ LOT 15 LOT 16 0°*.'". LOT 20 LOT 21 /' "� \' ♦ / L,J P I `� al.w „.,E 4• I % el.o c K ii ;` : r--1/ ` —1`40,`‘,•,_'%.,` !EASEMENT N--,-_,....9A,4,„, -El,ri,_.—.� / (i ,/ .;Q,/i/• / Ie] An i n fif � I: LOT 17 \ � La 47!,./ I } I a Z; �><,::�r—n., — ..4 3k '\\/..-v,,r.J/' EASEMENT i —— .2.4.:- •i \ oan.aw.1I-•V.. I • /' rEn s /; PARCEL C Lii TI •-KIMOn:MO c um I \ Tuerm,E (+, EASEM"NT r,•v - •' ...7"i. =-- wEuwo \ I �_ 9 New/Coe arar,e • \�aw�rmn.aunle E —. I \ I }''.. I dpk `ARC c /WOUNDS• ( I EKceTCN I �r OUTLOT B �_ \ \ j a ki I I l -- 5 d 3 p I ' T4\J SW WALOTtr✓ ' aiE';%•• i ___—___—__ wr�wEo--< I I „ S I NWEEa],]1 i \ � E.E.,B,] g l \ . ,C mum=....' I ■ b 1 a,,,,WE-, e 36 21 I I 5�g �•• \ ;♦A t� II\\ I G�r,r i �acw -wvoon \i T' Y WEST BR:dY�H R (C\^,•—R^-•5') T __ --I La,. ��!OEamme — 0 —- ■LEGEND I Yua_wanIVWCII 1 I -� T R——_L ET BR N::3i ROT::—i^^ RO. !sty Rama�nwY�uuwovr MAO I I WEST E3RANOH I !WEST BRAN..fl1 HILL arcawEE wrs-i r -y V. - ---_ ' mua® Emzrw I I ACRES I ll ii iADGREN ^ 1,TION .GENGTeN%M CAST IRON I I L ___ 15E( E.P.AG I4RVEYNG r MAROwEvru lvxSW SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS g ! W s i y s k i a Ft -3 i • o • a -rn • : CD ! W\\\\\ / / 1 CC \\\\ /Y Q / E_ \ \:� / / \. / / I Z ,.L �; T \/ / 1 W3.mac3M h / .,_S .: . ... . un:fp a\\ / �•'%i1./ ., 1 W / 4,-,....:.a \\ \\ / yr��J 1/ �' 11 Q / :7,..,: \, 9 w, 1 1 It1 \\Iy10 2,:s.:>:.4''''::3/4-1-:,4---- , `+�!b' -Wil,.7 -•— ——— `'/,..039110.1l ZW ' 'y 1 /A9 N..mamm,p CV ON HJNWIEl 1S3M :\ \\01302Nd 11• a L r-9 ——.— —....Yot%.440,1----- \ . 3W3Sv3i s. f/ R' — V" \\ •.& I `� `€ 14' /p?yil 0130x '.\i. , _ - \,9 \ ! II + i 91 f 1N3W3SS - - J ,,\ .._\ la o\ ti k \ J. \9 �' ;Ai 1 F� J t� I1 ,II �' ��\ � 1 4 \ \„ 77,21.....1::2:,/ H00i8 1 # ' , 13 W - \\ ��a° \ 1\ ii / r k! \ ' i \ \`p / .\\\.:40,..1.1110:.,i —_—L — 1/ s �9�:'° I 1 1� ��. I i U -.. .w. E I / 4,,,Z4...44....,„,... ) Ole / \;i Y'\ \� dodo 9 / m 1 4/ \\ �',. '�. cocAN . o\1f,QG\\�,g .1....,,`. 1/ 9,.a, • ' ,/\t: 1 ° / N..,�1°Na,I . 1p \„`-.• :,..,..kb .NINNY, 1 .•l;.i,/ / / /� .,mom •-444% 5 / F V / \ \\ i .�•� .4_._.=1'•"9.-2_w _ a.9,aw� // o � i / Q . \ ` .4",'S f - I uatao _gip // fisae 4 /.. `\\ • �i\ ' p`by...-”. an.v// 0 3021tld �.i` /.f1 0 ?\ • 'ice k .0,4• 44\ 1NN33t/3 / ` •\ aoo -' .y 1_J grin i°x� \� \`°:"i°".. •'c,�i\/ -ama� i' - IL E, \1` \ ./ s9iaw \C;--m too O �\N. RlQm3XF. v lo-uno !f We o ra CC \\ I 9v\ i'fy ! p 'o 1 I/,Al Sao woau O W ;'' W >. \ I moll / .y \ MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT FLOWAGE AN]) CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR WETLANDS Bridgewater Bank (the "Mortgagee"), Minnesota banking corporation, which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property legally described in Exhibit A to the foregoing Grant of Permanent Flowage and Conservation Easement and Restrictive Covenant for Wetlands (the "Grant"), which mortgage is dated June 11,2015, and was recorded the office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota, on June 12, 2015, as Document No. 5263412, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consents to all terms and provisions of, and is subject to, the Grant, and agrees that if the Mortgagee forecloses said mortgage on the property, or takes a deed in lieu of foreclosure,the Mortgagee will take title subject to the Grant. Dated this f day of_.,kr t ,2015. Bridgewater Bank By.----------___----- -- Its 1/ / - --- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OFin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ip day of A , 2015, by ,idkarv. Gri[ ,soeN the \lt`ec _s re,Degev,1 of Bridgewater Bank,Minnesota banking corporation, on behalf of the corporation. KRISTEN LEA FENSKE LANGE 'r Notary Pu6lio-Mlnnesota vo-..1 ::.--,x4.--'• My Casenisskxt Expires Jan SI,2017 tY1 LI-' ►, _ . . il. . . 1 o • Public 411 INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612)452-5000 SMM 804979.v4 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR WETLANDS Source Land Capital, LLC(the"Mortgagee"), Minnesota limited liability company, which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property legally described in Exhibit A to the foregoing Grant of Permanent Flowage and Conservation Easement and Restrictive Covenant for Wetlands (the "Grant"), which mortgage is dated June 11, 2015, and was recorded the office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota, on June 12, 2015,as Document No. 5263413, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consents to all terms and provisions of,and is subject to,the Grant, and agrees that if the Mortgagee forecloses said mortgage on the property, or takes a deed in lieu of foreclosure,the Mortgagee will take title subject to the Grant. Dated this 1 l day of 1 list-5 , 2015. Source Land C.;'lit. i By 7 V Its r /es,iko.' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF 4�h n 'ln ) The foregoing ins ent was acknowledged before me this day of I f U J 1 , 2015,by _ �- G the { 1 of S Source Land Capital LLC, innesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. _ AMY JEAN W11.41AMS Notary Public,State or Minnesota i $F.,,=_.... — -# :Y_Com_inf.lsion 0xpiresi; Janur18 ,7. ____ — Notary Public INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612)452-5000 SMM 804979_v4 7# / # ///, j * ♦ ♦ , CONSERVATION I _ EASEMENT PER DOC.— — I 1 _ N0. T05284392 i FENCE / GATE / _ / ui x PERGOLA W 4 ��// . N84`54'27"W 157.36 _ /I 1 BLOCK 3 LI/ — — — / I.::. 3 W/ •0,c, it / . / f 4%ws:;;:-E,.:„--. -:-.%,4i§, / 511NG WALKAiE WUT — 0 / i nT R 5/ E 38°1-- F.:( '..1 / J L — L.vi / / �l ,n / / Sir nE,, a65 / pow ON / LOT C V I J / / / / 11 �j `I / / NORi� / _ / / / 50 25 0 25 50 100 / / / / SCALE IN FEET / / / 't Y':',Z;'1; l L,77.7. 72,11 Easement Vacation Area / ''''°161 / ___ J5 ' alnm .:';i_tn-:Fg:,,I.A-,,,. .-f%,,, ,7.,;,::*-,,,.n,4,,,.,,,,;,,,_-„,_:„,,,,..,,,,,___,,,* _ _________ /ti Mgattaaiiiit*IViii,,,,„'-,7- ::7,,,-,-,a -,.!:-,,,_---_,_„„,--,:_.. / ___T_______ ________ - - —m Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets JOBS:64685-020 REVISIONS i Ens s"`",, H SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT FIELD CREW:AT -— - DRAWN BY:JPR,JJA ., 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA,MN.55391(952)4]6-6000 PREPARED FOR iW CHECKED BY:JJA c"`RS NORTON HOMES DATE:10/16/19 EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of the following described"EASEMENT PARCEL D"created by Hennepin County,Minnesota Document number T05284392 embraced within Lot 7,Block 3,LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Said"EASEMENT PARCEL D"is described as that part of Lot 1 through Lot 22,Block 3 and Outlot A of said LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 19;thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 19,a distance of 218.89 feet to the point of beginning;thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 14 second East,along said northerly line of said Lot 19 a distance of 28.29 feet;thence easterly a distance of 240.18 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 281.35 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds;thence South 41 degrees 07 minutes 03 seconds East,tangent to said curve,along the northerly line of said Lot 17 and Lot 20 a distance of 257.697 feet;thence South 49 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 130.71 feet;thence South 3 degrees 40 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 363.73 feet;thence South 38 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 219.29 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 21;thence South 60 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 231.50 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 22;thence South 45 degrees 04 minutes 57 seconds West,along the easterly line of said Lot 22 a distance of 39.13 feet to the most westerly comer OUTLOT I,thence South 50 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds East along the northerly line of OUTLOT A 84.00 feet;thence South 66 degrees 12 minutes 39 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 32.51 feet;thence South 61 degrees 10 minutes 28 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 205.02 feet;thence South 66 degrees 28 minutes 28 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 191.90 feet; thence South 50 degrees 09 minutes 04 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT Ae of 86.02 feet;thence North 78 degrees 23 minutes 46 seconds East, along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A 34.87 feet;thence South 63 degrees 05 minutes 34 seconds East,along the northerly line of said OUTLOT A 25.49 feet; thence South 24 degrees 51 minutes 08 seconds East,along the easterly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 145.02 feet;thence South 15 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East,along the easterly line of said OUTLOT A,a distance of 134.44 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 8;thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8 a distance of 271.08 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 8;thence South 24 degrees II minutes 18 seconds West,along the easterly line of said Lot 8 a distance of 124.58 feet to the most northerly comer of said Lot 7;thence South 40 degrees 01 minutes 27 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 7 a distance of 131.63 feet;thence South 78 degrees 06 minutes 25 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 6 a distance of 236.54 feet;thence North 24 degrees 11 minutes 03 seconds East,along a northwesterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 109.96 feet;thence South 65 degrees 39 minutes 42 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 5,a distance of 123.30 feet;thence southeasterly a distance of 213.89,along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 297.65 feet and a central angle of 41 degrees 10 minutes 22 seconds;thence South 24 degrees 29 minutes 20 seconds East,along the easterly line of said Lot 4 and Lot 3 a distance of 722.04 feet;thence southerly a distance of 316.26 feet along the easterly line of said Lot 2,on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 253.48 feet and central angle of 71 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds;thence South 46 degrees 59 minutes 48 seconds West,along the southeasterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 57.80 feet to the most southerly corner of said Lot 2;thence northwesterly a distance of 608.14 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 1004.93 feet,a central angle of 34 degrees 40 minutes 22 seconds and a chord that bears North 62 degrees 27 minutes 45 seconds West,to the southwest corner of Lot 1 Block 3;thence North 4 degrees 58 minutes 44 seconds East,along the west line of said Lot 1,a distance of 150.09 feet;thence North 8 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds East,along the westerly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 11.72 feet;thence South 57 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 271.96 feet;thence North 83 degrees 38 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 130.19 feet;thence North 21 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 267.77 feet;thence North 27 degrees 08 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 271.63 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 3;thence North 40 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 272.83 feet to the westerly line of Lot 4;thence North 77 degrees 13 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 197.14 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 5;thence North 84 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 358.64 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 7;thence North 79 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 403.54 feet;thence South 27 degrees 47 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 259.89 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 9;thence North 63 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West,along the southerly line of said Lot 9 and Lot 10 a distance of 154.56 feet;thence North 20 degrees 50 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 218.75 feet;thence North 57 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 229.65 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 10;thence North 73 degrees 09 minutes 07 seconds West a distance of 203.48 feet;thence South 32 degrees 20 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 198.79 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 11; thence northwesterly a distance of 169.00 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 540.00 feet,a central angle of 17 degrees 55 minutes 52 seconds and a chord that bears North 35 degrees 07 minutes 36 seconds West;thence North 63 degrees 08 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 155.28 feet; thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 320.76 feet to the northerly line of Lot 12;thence North 53 degrees 17 minutes 50 seconds West distance of 214.54 feet thence South 57 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 171.85 feet to the westerly line of Lot 13;thence northwesterly a distance of 102.49 feet along a non-tangential crave concave to the southwest having a radius of 450.00 feet,a central angle of 13 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds and a chord that bears North 51 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds West;thence North 57 degrees 38 minutes 13 seconds West,tangent to last said curve,along the southerly line of said Lot 14 and Lot 15 a distance of 413.68 feet;thence northwesterly a distance of 167.84 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 175.00 feet and central angle of 54 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds;thence North 02 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds West,along the westerly line of said Lot 15,a distance of 67.86 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 15;thence North 87 seconds 19 minutes 12 seconds East,along the northerly line of said Lot 15,a distance of 162.06 feet;thence easterly a distance of 8.44 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 190.00 feet and central angle of 2 degrees 32 minutes 37 seconds;thence South 6 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 198.95 feet;thence South 57 degrees 44 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 263.72 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 15;thence South 80 degrees 30 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 175.91 feet;thence North 46 degrees 14 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 90.79; thence North 2 degrees 57 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 375.89 feet;thence North 47 degrees 33 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 169.21 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 16;thence North 79 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 481.41 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 18;thence northeasterly a distance of 19.48 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 225.00 feet and central angle of 4 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds and a chord that bears North 36 degrees 46 minutes 12 seconds East;thence North 39 degrees 15 minutes 01 seconds East,tangent to last said curve,along the westerly line of said Lot 18 a distance of 107.80 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 18;thence northeasterly a distance of 19.23 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 365.00 feet and central angle of 3 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds;thence South 78 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 185.02 feet; thence North 17 degrees 45 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 355.42 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Eos s�R i Sheet 2 oft Sheets JOB#:64685-020 REVISIONS W P -BERGQUIST, INC. EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT FIELD CREW:AT SATHRE_ 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA,MN.55391(952)476-6000 PREPARED FOR DRAWN BY:JPR,JJA zW CHECKED BY:JJA NORTON HOMES DATE:10/16/19 71 MOST NORTHERLY i CORNER OF LOT 7 / NW LINE OF LOT 7 �. h • ry . ry. 3 . 93 „.3 ry� FENCE L /, —EAST LINE OF LOT 7 /x S85°21'31"E 152.96 �,/I / 'PERGOLA' --I-----ti 0 , ^ BLOCK 3 0 — -- ii IP / e :/ LOT 7 // f Ags::::"::'-'''''7'0 // • 4 1 /t. �� / / EXISTING EVIEWUT - ® / iv i 8 5/ 7B,L WAY .:,��I I / / 111 / , ))/ / / 'al, / ON I / „T 6 / / / - / / / / / / / / / < / - / / / / / 1 1 / / / J J __ / ,..1..... A HEREON FROM RECORDED PLAT OM / a, ' / ®� " LLLD...SHOWN .L.___ -- lei Alinii. 52 --------- / ____T_____ ; � r\ \/ -_ . � 5 s L.77./1(....1 Easement Area EASEMENT DESCRIPTION An easement over,under and across that part of Lot 7,Block 3,LAKEVIEW OF ORONO,according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota,lying northerly of the following described line: ��� Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 7;thence on an assumed bearing of South 29 degrees 38 minutes I I seconds West along the northwest line of said Lot 7 a distance of 162.25 feet to the point of beginning of said line;thence South 85 degrees 21 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 152.96 feet to the east line of said Lot 7 and there terminating ,� j N0R1� Easement area:14,100 sq.ft. 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET nor soR�e Section 07-Township 117-Range 23 JOB#:646855-020 REVISIONS ,._ 'Fsr n SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. EASEMENT EXHIBIT FIELD CREW:AT Niy r 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA,MN.55391 19521 47PREPARED FOR 68000 DRAWN BY:JPR,JJA CHECKED BY:JJA "`Rs of NORTON HOMES DATE:10/16/19 • •W • k 4 , F" ...;::',4-7)..-if,,,..;.. Ig. 44:,......•-• 4 ;...4 ‘, .!.. - . [0. ::,,,,„.• , ' 2).:',ui,•:pii!.. ...::.•:•',.... ,....-. --............ - . - . . i --' ';';•.:i °41.1.7' ,:f.f:',4....• 4 t -!'-'' iY 14 • � . • ' 44., - ,. k gas 0 .. - . . . .. -, .. .....,.-. . �t�4� R. i t 3s" .-.y-' `•"fit 4 g4g F . e — 'r•'u I*.7.:),-;:,..--*.', a�' , k+''''.'7 '*-..‘,1., ,F' Y 4 ms's w'.. � } , • j € f 4. , • f jy , �f f f d 3 i •� a ( ` 1 f - r , " f 1 - . - ',,, ...A'lif''' f: ,; l','---' Z ., -,.,-,-lif , L , .!.,..:-4 .. ..4,';'. -141';'4.4;;;*. — ' ,' ' ., J. ' 11 il t --..,-,,if....,.( it ,. , � i i w. �, f,! 1. ! fix,:: a t EL • ti � I . cI.) ,7 f Letter View City of Orono TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 1300.0220 of the 2015 Minnesota Building Code verifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the local jurisdiction regulating building construction or use. For the following: Building Address: 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND, MN 55364 PIN: 0611723430021 Lot/Block: 007/003 Zoning District: Permit Number: RPS18-000076 Construction Type: VB Residential or Commercial Un-Protected Occupancy Group: IRC 1 Fire Sprinkler: N/A Owner Name: CHRISTOPHER T EVENSON Owner Address: AMY M EVENSON 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND, MN 55364 THE FOLLOWING ARE NOTED AS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING AND MUST BE COMPLETED BY OCTOBER 1, 2019 * As-built survey to be submitted and approved showing: -All exterior improvements completed (driveway, sidewalks, patios, etc.) and shown on the as-built survey - Final Grading Completed and shown on the as-built survey * Erosion control to remain in place until sod/vegetation is established THESE MUST BE CORRECTED OR COMPLETED AND REINSPECTED BY OCTOBER 1, 2019 OR THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE VOID. Failure to correct these deficiences may cause occupancy violation citations to be issued. I hereby agree to make the above corrections and to call for reinspection with the time allowed: Owner/Agent Date August 16, 2019 ROGER PEITSO Date BUILDING OFFICIAL Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.pdf111/13/2019 9:53:13 AM] Letter View CITY OF ORONO RP S 18- 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356 • 76 (952) 249-4600 FAX (952)249- O000kEsu0¢� 4616 DATE ISSUED: 10/18/2018 ADDRESS: 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND, MN 55364 PIN: 0611723430021 PERMIT TYPE: Residential Principal Structure Building Permit - New Construction PROPERTY TYPE: Vacant Land - Residential CONSTRUCTION TYPE: ACTIVITY: Residential Two Story VALUATION: $ 695,000.00 APPLICANT Norton Homes, LLC 18215 45th Ave N Plymouth, MN 55446 • PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE OWNER STATE SURCHARGE (VALUATION): CHRISTOPHER T EVENSON Description Amount AMY M EVENSON 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY Building Permit Fee $4,653.67 MOUND, MN 55364 Escrow $ 1,000.00 Plan Review- Residential 65% $ 3,024.89 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT Surcharge Fee (.0005 of Valuat $ 347.50 Total Permit Fees $ 9,026.06 The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications, applicable City approvals, and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for PAYMENT(S): additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work Payment Date Reference # Amount Paid shall be complied with whether or not specified herein. This 09/28/2018 2820180923910976209 $ 3,024.89 permit will expire and become null and void if construction 10/18/2018 New House $6,001.17 authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance, or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code. This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. Applicant Permitee Signature: ISSUED BY: • 1®' October 18, 2018 Permit Approved.pdf1l1/13/2019 9:45:56 AM] Letter View ROGER PEITSO BUILDING OFFICIAL Permit Approved.pdf111/13/2019 9:45:56 AM] City of Orono CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 110 of the International Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the local jurisdiction regulating building construction or use. For the following: Building Address: 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY PIN: 06-117-23-43-0021 Legal Description: Lakeview of Orono Block 3 Lot 7 Zoning District: Permit No: 2016-01501 Work Activity: Single Family Construction Type: Occupancy: Occupant Load: Fire Sprinkler: N Applicant: Gonyea Homes Applicant Address: 1000 Boone Ave N#400 City,State,Zip: Golden Valley,MN 55427- Owner Name: Gonyea Homes Owner Address: 780 Lakeview Pkwy City,State,Zip: Mound,MN 55364- FOR YOUR INFORMATION For any police,fire or medical emergency-Call:911 Posting of your assigned street number Is required In purchasing a new home,file for your homestead at the City offices.Register your address for voting,drivers license and automobile registration.City water and sewer is billed quarterly.Septic Inspection fees are billed annually.Permits are required for any additions or alterations on your property or for construction of any garages, deck,dock or other accessory structure. Special regulations prohibit any excavation,filling,grading,dredging,tree removal,or construction of any kind within 75 feet of any lakeshore or within 26 feet of any wetlands. ciothitiotat,„ g. � 17 Zoning Administrator Date 'or ' ' 717 ( mg ci Date CITY OF ORONO HUAI '1 I I' �I * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY * A 1 6 - 0 1 5 1 DATE ISSUED: 01112/20172017 ORONO,MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 DRESS : 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY 1-IN : 06-117-23-43-0021 LEGAL DESC : LAKEVIEW OF ORONO : LOT 7 BLOCK 3 PERMIT TYPE : NEW STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : SINGLE FAMILY ACTIVITY : 101-SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES,DETACHED VALUATION : $ 568,229.00 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED:PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,FIREPLACE,WELL(STATE),ELECTRICAL(STATE) NOTE:PLEASE SEE AND INITIAL NEW BUILDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 3,992.17 NYEA HOMES PLAN REVIEW 644.96 1000 BOONE AVE N#400 STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 284.11 GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427- TOTAL 4,921.24 (612)741-9069 Payment(s) Minnesota State License#: BUIL-2459 CHECK 13262 4,921.24 OWNER Gonyea Homes 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND,MN 55364- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be ked at an " e for due cause. i l , ,,,7 Applicant :emit-= "ignature Date Iss - : Signature Date City of Orono Building Permit A lication 1-/- 'i pp l q for New Structures or Additions V I,d' Mailing Address: / �D fi..� 0 ' 1' iztP PO Box 66 Permit number: 94 `VQ qi.,\,tri' d Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006uRECEIVEQDate received: M-1)/---/ 1 Street Address:' DEC 01 20166eceived by: P c,`'. ' 2750 Kelley Parkway St�� y, Plan review fee: YP i-f ?' Orono, MN 55356 CITY OF ORONO ) l'kEstiov- Main: 952-249-4600 Total Fee: oZd! ' ' ���S Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: 7,I0I,4.e WI, <-CA) Pair k(4)4 Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes ELNo If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLJCANT INFORMATION: Name: �D K a 1 0 t-c S State License # YScl Expiration Date: Phone: (cell) j l') -7111- I©b (office) Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Contact Person: Ef jar Applicant is: n acto - / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: e IC, se-I k ..5,011 y-eek hui'VE ; . (o wq_ PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Phone (day): Address: City: ZIP: Email and/or Fax ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION: � � � 1 n l Name: b —e y i7L i/ Phone (day): / Address: ,___� `rt 9_ ZIP: Email and/or Fax: ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION: Name: Phone(day): e V/(4-0_ ---/4-4-e—,- / _ �� �// Address: / 14,14_ ZIP: Email and/or Fax: PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of, /I (11 1.Type of Project 2. Prc 4. Sewage Disposal& Water Supply ew Construction ,,._ _ _ _ e ❑Addition attached garage U L., ,,„ ❑Accessory Building 0 Single Family with 0 Office/Commercial ❑ Public Sewer ❑ Relocation detached garage 0 ResidenceSeptic ❑ Other: (specify) 0 Multiple Family/Condo 0 Retaining Wall(s) (Compliance certificate 0 Public 4-feet or greater may be required) **Any earth movement may require 0 Commercial 0 Storage MCWD review&permits. 0 Industrial 0 Warehouse 0 Public Water Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) 0 Other: (specify) 0 Other(specify) 15320 Minnetonka Blvd;Minnetonka,MN 55345D-Pnvate Well Phone: 952-471-0590 / Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.oro Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ y � > iD Packet Last Updated: January 2016 Page 21 STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1. Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) ,-"Xj a. Length(ft.)= Number of bedrooms= , _ L 2. Occupancy: �,,. l./" / r "'idth(ft.)= Number of garage stalls: 3. Occupant Load: as in square feet Attached= f/ c. Basement= 1 336 Detached= 4. Type of Construcion: -i--- r C/ d. 151 Story = /, 4 c1 e.2nd Story= /61 D 5. Code Edition: i'/q— /iige,. f. '/2 Story = 7/0 ;.er+ f G t r%-iik ' g.Total Area= .C3 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable ❑ 0 Building Permit Escrow Agreement and Fees ❑ 0 Plan Review Fee ❑ 0 Completed Application Form lEr 0 Proposed Building Plans—2 full size sets,to scale and 1 reduced 11 x 17 or 8% x 11 set ISK 0 Minnesota State Enemy Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Requirements pK- 0 Survey—2 full size,to scale(meeting ALL survey requirements) 0 Hardcover Calculations ❑ 0 Septic System Certification ❑ 0 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)Permit or Documentation from MCWD stating no permit is required ❑ 0 Landscape Walls and/or Retaining Wall Plans ❑ 0 Landscape Plan ❑ 0 Stomiwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) 0 0 _Access Permit L0 0 Data Privacy Advisory Form APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. • Agrees that In the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy Is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a$10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. '.7------- - 'cant's Signature: _ Date: l Viz'/ / Owe ier'S Signature: Date: Packet Last Updated: January 2016 Page 22 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS Address: $d IKes1 eco/ Paricway Permit No.: OltVI* 201(0 0 01 Description of work: Noll S n l - Pi1'YUty kat- Date Rec'd: 12--i _I(0 Septic review by: 1-7-61-.4-) Date Approved: / 2 */rte Zoning review by: Date Approved: G'3 ''1 Building review by: 1"..:(>4Date Approved: / /i' // Grading review by: r r 11 d WUt V Date Approved: fl'- (L I ( Zoning District: ge"(.13 Zoning File#: Resolution? Yes Reso#: Reso Date: Signed: Yes o Resolu on NA Zoning: Lot Area: n7 /AC Width: Structural Coverage: SF % Survey Submitted: s 0 No Date of Survey: 10 '(-7' / ( Revised date(?): Landscape plan submitted? Yes Landscaper tO vie(I(m11-4 0 No/None nr^posed Proposed Setbacks: SOU-) Front(L ) Rear(S et) ( N SCE) W ) ( N S E ) VV...4:Y` ni Side' Side b ` 173 ' 52' . j ' i p . Building Height Analysis: _ 41`�' Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof* (See "building height" definition): (a) 1 '1(01 First Floor Elevation (from building plans): (b) qq 31 Highest Existing ground level (per survey) or 10' (c) 4 2 r 00 above lowest ground level, whichever is lower: Difference between (b) and (c): (d) '',, 2.. Defined Building Height(a) - (d): (e) 45 0( Shoreland'District MCWD Permit Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff Met? Yes 0 No' Permit Number iii- Y3(V 0 Yes 0 No AN/A 0 Yes 34,No 0 N/A-see attached Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed Overlay District Tier Hardcover Hardcover Variance Required CUP Required (circle one) (% and sf) (%and sf) 3 4 5 11.15.90 (0q010 0 Yes ( (lo 0 Yes No 1 di) l0 (0 4. 'B 3 f Type(s): Type(s): Updated: October 2016 vaforms\plan review checklist 10-2016.docx Fees to be Charged YES NO Permit ' ,` t7 Plan Review State Surcharge V Investigation Fee ;1'` SAC—Number of SAC Units VI Other(specify) v-- Square Footage $ per Square Footage p Basement / ;3i3 X 1 t 9.`'7) = $ J S 4l3 i l! 1st Roor ic i5 e 7 /(v i gi4 I) x f co, • $ 5z, , 11,"7 g p, rop-i wti- 1 t X ;-7& = $ `.,469' 120 Garage itdkC4 /07%/Z/0-00) X c1, Z-.. _ $ LI-7, 4411; 01 V Estimated Construction Value: $ ., (0 V1 Orono inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Footing O Site lumbing D Grading/Filling Poured Wall Silt Fence/Erosion Control Mechanical 0 Fire oundation Survey 0 Hardcover Removal Fireplace 0 Water Connection 0 Framing 0 Other(specify) 0 Masonry 0 Sewer Connection Waterproofing/Drain tile 0 Mfg. 0 Lawn Irrigation undation Waterproofing 0 Other(specify) 0 Landsca in tE Framing Landscaping Insulation As-Built Survey Final Lathe Required State Permits 0 Other(specify) Well )(Electrical REMARKS (in-house): OFFICIAL REMARKS-TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED: >.(,See Builder Acknowledgement Form D Prior to release of escrow money an as-built survey and hardcover calculations must be submitted and approved. Updated: October 2016 v:\fonins\plan review checklist 10-2016.docx Builder Acknowledgement Form Permit #2016-01501 / 780 Lakeview Parkway Builder Representative Name: 617 v\ Permit Conditions: Initials **NOTE CHANGE** Before scheduling an exterior insulation and/or drain tile inspection, a foundation as-built survey must be submitted and approved by the City or a Stop Work order will be issued. Schedule a minimum of one hour for the framing inspection. J� Erosion control mechanisms must be installed and inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities. The contractor must provide a minimum of a 24 hour notice prior to EAL inspection. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained throughout the entire project and must remain until vegetation has been established. A haul route shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and inspection prior to commencement of hauling from the site.The property owner shall be responsible for cleaning and repair of roadways for any adverse impacts. No underground sewer within 20 feet of well. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy an as-built survey and hardcover calculations must be submitted and approved. In the event of winter or other extended unfavorable weather conditions (which prevent the completion of the exterior improvements and/or as-built survey) a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) may be necessary. A TCO requires a $10,000 escrow. Advisory Comments Any changes to the exterior/landscaping improvements, i.e. patios, grading, sidewalks, retaining walls, etc. not currently shown on the approved survey and landscaping plan will require a separate Zoning Permit application to be submitted and approved prior to the work commencing. Any retaining walls that are over 4-feet in height or tiered walls not separated by twice of the height of the lower wall require engineered plans and a building permit to be submitted and approved prior to construction. w:\street files\lakeview parkway\780\builder acknowledgement form 2016-01501.docx Christine Mattson From: Adam Edwards Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 1:11 PM Christine Mattson ect: RE: 780 Lakeview Parkway/#2016-01501 Chris, I've approved the grading plan with the comment to protect the septic sites. Perimeter sediment control measures should be installed by the Contractor and inspected by the City prior to any work, including demolition. Contractor must provide minimum 24 hour notice prior to inspection. Adam From: Christine Mattson Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 10:05 AM To: Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: 780 Lakeview Parkway/#2016-01501 We received a building permit application for a new single family home. A few items I noted: Silt fence should be updated to protect septic sites • Need first floor elevation (FFE) to be called out • Need landscape plan Please review and provide comments. Thank you! Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono I MN 155356 (physical address) PO Box 66 I Crystal Bay I MN 155323-0066 (mailing address) sr 952.249.4620 18 952.249.4616 [x] cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us I www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Friday, December 23, 2016 Monday, December 26, 2016 Monday,January 2, 2017 Monday,January 16, 2017 1 CITY OF ORONO Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249.4600 /� r ti� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4.616 < c C.' Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us 4kESH04` December 20,2016 Ethan Kindseth Gonyea Homes 1000 Boone Ave#400 Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Building Permit Application#2016-01501 780 Lakeview Parkway The City received a building permit application for a new single family home. Staff conducted a preliminary review based on the information provided and recommends the following items be submitted or revised in order for your application to be considered complete and for the plan review to continue: 1. Certificate of Survey. a. While the height of the house appears to meet City Code standards,please have the surveyor provide the first floor elevation. b. Silt fence Is shown to be Installed through the septic sites. Please protect the septic sites and have the slit fence location modified. After the silt fence has been Installed, please call for an inspection. The contractor must provide a minimum of a 24-hour notice prior to inspection and before any land disturbing activities. 2. Landscape Plan. Prior to the Issuance of the building permit a landscape plan must be submitted showing all the proposed exterior/landscaping Improvements,i.e.patios,grading,sidewalks,retaining walls,etc. The plan should include the name of the individual performing the work. Any proposed patios, grading, sidewalks, retaining walls shown on the landscape plan should also be reflected on the survey. 3. Escrow&Escrow Agreement. Permits involving grading and/or review by the City's engineer require submittal of an escrow and an escrow agreement. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for out-of-pocket costs incurred during the review of your plans. Additionally this escrow will guarantee conformance with City Code Chapter 79 relating to erosion control and stormwater. The required escrow amount for this project is $2,500. The escrow agreement is enclosed. The property owner must sign the enclosed agreement and submit a check for$2,500. Please feel free to contact me at 952.249.4620 or by email at cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions on the above requirements. Sincerely,5C OFORONO, Aft:PK-- Christine a 'ttson Planning Assistant c via email Ethan Kindseth Dave Pemberton Roger Peltso,Building Official enclosure Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:16 PM 'Ethan Kindseth' pemberton@sathre.com; Roger Peitso Subject: 780 Lakeview Parkway/#2016-01501 Attachments: letter.pdf; Escrow Agreement - Building Permit w Erosion Control 2016-01501.pdf Ethan, Attached is a copy of the letter and enclosure being mailed today. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono I MN 155356 (physical address) PO Box 66 I Crystal Bay I MN 155323-0066 (mailing address) lit 952.249.4620 18 952.249.4616 cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us I � www.ci.orono.mn.us O"°-e Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Friday, December 23, 2016 Monday, December 26, 2016 Monday,January 2, 2017 Monday, January 16, 2017 1 Permit Application: Self-Checklist for Completeness Please note, the applicant must initial in the boxes below to acknowledge the minimum required information is included with the submittal. If not, the application will NOT be accepted. Call 952.249.4620 to schedule a meeting with staff if you have questions on application submittal requirements. Ei --'. ---*-- Completed Application ErPlan Review Fee Paid Signed Escrow Agreement & Escrow Payment laps (to scale) x2 11PiCertificate of Survey (to,scale) showing the proposed project & meeting all requirements x2 Hardcover Calculations (if applicable) I am aware that Orono will not issue a building permit without a Elcopy of MCWD permits (or documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project does not trigger their permitting requirements). I will contact the MCWD at 952-471-0590 regarding this project. Signed by: , ---2 ..i. Address: 7 TO 1 ,lj ,vict.,) Fri-r k"14 y Permit #: CCS i cp -0 I .$`Q W:\Applications,License or Permit Applications\Zoning Applications\Permit Application Completeness Checklist 2015.docx KECEIVED . City City of Orono s 11001. 1' 'I Hardcover Calculation Worksheet DEC 01 2016 Property Address: 780 Lakview Parkway,Orono,Minnesota CITY OF ORONO Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Inc. Date: 10/13/2016 SB Job Number: 31202-354 Prepared By: Bryan Voit Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 iiir Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier S Step 1:PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A HOUSE IRREGULAR 3,410 S.F. B DRIVEWAY IRREGULAR 4,800 S.F. C STOOP IRREGULAR 140 S.F. D DECK IRREGULAR 122 S.F. E WINDOW WELL IRREGULAR 30 S.F. F SIDEWALK IRREGULAR 95 S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Proposed Hardcover 8597 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3)Net Proposed Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 8597 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 87,780 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 9.79% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. KEGblVE City of Orono DEC p 1 2016 *yolk Hardcover Calculation Worksheet E Property Address: 780 Lakeview Parkway,Orono CITY OF ORONO Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Inc. Date: 10/13/2016 SB Job Number: 31202-354 Pre•ared by: Bryan Voit Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 l ier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A GRAVEL TRAIL 1,010 S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover 1010 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 1,010 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 87,780 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 1.15% (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Voigt & Associates, Inc. on7.7 ' STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES °Rom c 4635 NICOLS RD. SUITE 204 EAGAN, MN 55122 - PH. (651)686-7727 FAX. (651)686-8444 'chael Karn October 8, 2016 vonyea Homes 1000 Boone Ave No, Suite 400 Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-432-4511 michael C`eonveacompanies.com RE: Evenson Residence at 780 Lakeview Parkway,Orono,MN 55364 Dear Mr. Karn: Per your request, I examined the main level front garage wall of the house plan for the address above for compliance with the 2015 Minnesota State Building Code(2012 IRC w/Minnesota amendments) bracing requirements. Your plan notes that you will be sheathing the entire exterior of the building with OSB permitting the use of Table R602.10.4 Continuous Sheathing Methods, CS-WSP and CS-PFH. Please note IRC Figures R602.10.8(1)and R602.10.8(2)Braced Wall Panel ...to Floor/Ceiling Framing connection requirements for the continuous method (attached). The attached sheet,BP1, indicates the locations of braced wall segments for the front elevation of the main level of this house and the location of portal frames. See Detail Sl. Note that many of the braced wall segment locations may be moved to accommodate unforeseen wall and plate perforations. If you find that you must move a braced wall segment more than 2 feet from its indicated location, please call. ditionally,per your request, I examined the stairwell wall on the plan you sent to me for the home at the above address. e Detail T1. You also asked that I review the tall wall at the sport court. Frame the exterior walls of the sport court indicated on your Lower Floor Plan as walkout with (2)2X6s#2 SPF @ 12"centers, the exterior walls indicated as Look Out with(1)2X6#2 SPF @ 12"centers and the wall indicated as Full Height with(1) 2X6#2 SPF @ 16"centers. A basic assumption of IRC bracing is that the rest of the structure is properly constructed and connected per the appropriate section of the code. There is a notable requirement in IRC Table R602.3(1),Fastening Schedule for Structural Members for braced wall lines. It notes that the connection at the Sole plate to joist or joist blocking at braced wall panels be 3- 16d nails every 16"oc. The information and opinions contained herein are based upon the limited investigation described at the beginning of this report. No warranties are expressed or implied regarding the existence of other unknown conditions not specifically addressed. Our work is in accordance with generally accepted engineering standards and is not intended to be relied upon or transferred to individuals other than the addressee. Should information or conditions become known which differ from the discussion herein, they may alter the opinions or conclusions of the undersigned. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, I Hereby Certify That This Plan, Specification,Or Report Was Prepared IlftcEIVE By Me Or Under My Direct Supervision And That I Am A Duly DEC 01 2016 Licensed Engineer Under The Laws Of The State Of Minnesota. Paul W. Voigt Date 10/8/16 License Number 20705 CITY OF ORONO e ccawr�raace cer�e 'tc,a,IL�, pi /e.c�tt Gct( 7 Q e / New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate Nt . tIVtL) Date Certificate Posted Per R401.3 Building Certificate.A building certificate shall be posted on or in the electrical distribution panel. 10/4/16 DEC 2016 Mailing Address of the Dwelling or Dwelling Unit 780 Lakeview Parkway Name of Residential Contractor MN License Number CITY OF ORONO Gonyea Homes 2459 City Plan ID Orono GH0660 THERMAL ENVELOPE (RADON CONTROL SYSTEM Type:Check All That Apply X Passive(No Fan) o I F>, A T Active(With fan and monometer or ti i �, u ; N v „ a ° other system monitoring device) v v El n d .2 41 t j t.. .o 2 Location(or future Location)of Fan: m 15 .. g ;a ,Fy VT Insulation Location a .52 o co v. U :° ua 41 76 ' ' E c 74 v ° _ no8 ° ii-- , z w c, wx x Other Please Describe Here Below Entire Slab X I _Foundation Wall R-10 X Exterior Perimeter of Slab on Grade X _ _ Rim Joist(1st Floor) R-20 X _Interior Rim Joist(2nd Floor) R-20 X , Interior 1 Wall R-20 X Ceiling,flat R-49 X Ceiling,vaulted R-30 X Bay Windows or cantilevered areas R-30 X Floors over unconditioned areas R-38 X Describe other insulated areas _ Building Envelope air Tightness: Duct system air tightness: i Windows&Doors Heating or Cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces Average U-Factor(excludes skylights and one door)U: .27-.31 Not applicable,all ducts located in conditioned space Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC): .25-.29 R-8 R-value MECHANICAL SYSTEMS l Make-up Air Select a Type Appliances Heating System Domestic Water Heater Cooling System X Not required per mech.code Fuel Type NAT GAS ELECTRIC R-410A Passive Manufacturer Bryant Westinghouse Bryant Powered Interlocked with exhaust device. Model 912SC600100S21 WEC080C2X045 BA13NA048 Describe: Input in100000 Capacity in 80 Output in 4 Other,describe: Rating or Size BTUS: Gallons: Tons: AFUE or 92% SEER or 13 Location of duct or system: Efficiency HSPF% EER HEAT LOSS HEAT GAIN COOLING LOAD RESIDENTIAL LOAD CALL 76,652 39,254 46,228 Cfm's I "rouno duct OK Mechanical Ventilation System "metal duct Describe any additional or combined heating or cooling systems if installed:(e.g.two furnaces or air Combustion Air Select a Type source heat pump with gas back-up furnace X Not required per mech.code Select Type Passive Heat Recover Ventilator(HRV) Capacity in cfms: Low: High: Other,describe: Energy Recover Ventilator(ERV)Capacity in cfms: Low: 40%=124 High: 70°/n=217 Location of duct or system: Balanced Ventilation Capcity in CFMS: furnace room Locations of Fans,describe: ' Cfm's Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfms: 105 "round duct OR Total ventilation(intermittent+continuous)rate in cfms: 210 "metal duct 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono EVENSON HVAC Load Calculations for Gonyea Homes Golden Valley, MN Prepared By: Michael Holum Sabre Plumbing&Heating 15535 Medina Road Plymouth, MN 55447 763-473-2267 Thursday, September 22, 2016 Rhvac is an ACCA approved Manual J and Manual D computer program. Calculations are performed per ACCA Manual J 8th Edition, Version 2, and ACCA Manual D. Rhvac-Residential&Light Commercial HVAC Loads Elite Software Development,Inc. Sabre Plumbing &Heating 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono EVENSON Plymouth,MN 55447 Page 2 Project Report General Project Information Project Title: 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono EVENSON Designed By: Michael Hoium Project Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 Client Name: Gonyea Homes Client City: Golden Valley, MN Company Name: Sabre Plumbing & Heating Company Representative: Michael Hoium Company Address: 15535 Medina Road Company City: Plymouth, MN 55447 Company Phone: 763-473-2267 Company Fax: 763-473-8565 Design Data Reference City: Minneapolis, Minnesota Building Orientation: Front door faces East Daily Temperature Range: Medium Latitude: 44 Degrees Elevation: 834 ft. Altitude Factor: 0.970 Outdoor Outdoor Outdoor Indoor Indoor Grains Dry Bulb Wet Bulb ReLHum Rel. um Dry Bulb Difference Winter: -15 -12.38 n/a 30% 72 29.40 Summer: 88 73 50% 50% 75 35 Check Figures Total Building Supply CFM: 1,784 CFM Per Square ft.: 0.322 Square ft. of Room Area: 5,540 Square ft. Per Ton: 1,438 Volume (ft3)of Cond. Space: 57,547 Building toads: Total Heating Required Including Ventilation Air: 76,652 Btuh 76.652 MBH Total Sensible Gain: 39,254 Btuh 85 % Total Latent Gain: 6,974 Btuh 15 3/0 Total Cooling Required Including Ventilation Air: 46,228 Btuh 3.85 Tons (Based On Sensible+ Latent) Notes Rhvac is an ACCA approved Manual J and Manual D computer program. Calculations are performed per ACCA Manual J 8th Edition,Version 2, and ACCA Manual D. All computed results are estimates as building use and weather may vary. Be sure to select a unit that meets both sensible and latent loads according to the manufacturer's performance data at your design conditions. Thursday, September 22, 2016, 9:27 AM Rhvac-Residential&Light Commercial HVAC Loads Elite Software Development,Inc. Sabre Plumbing&Heating 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono EVENSON Plymouth.MN 55447 Page 3 Load Preview Report Net; ft.z` Sen, Lat. NetSen Sys Sys,, Sys' Duct Dpe ' Ton /Tont Area, Gain! Gain. Gain; Loss Htg' Clg Act' Size CFM CFM= CM' Building 3.85 1,438 5,540 39,254 6,974 46,228 76,652 922 1,784 1,784 System 1 3.85 1,438 5,540 39,254 6,974 46,228 76,652 922 1,784 1,784 18x18 Ventilation 1,165 4,873 6,038 7,799 Humidification 8,052 Zone 1 5,540 38,089 2,101 40,190 60,801 922 1,784 1,784 18x18 1-Basement 1,569 6,040 0 6,040 14,618 222 283 283 3-6 2-Sport Court 710 2,137 0 2,137 12,131 184 100 100 1-6 3-Main Floor 1,569 17,731 2,101 19,832 17,896 271 831 831 8-6 4-Second Floor 1,692 12,179 0 12,179 16,156 245 571 571 6-6 Thursday, September 22, 2016, 9:27 AM Rhvac-Residential&Light Commercial HVAC Loads Elite Software Development,Inc. Sabre Plumbing&Heating 780 Lakeview Parkway Orono EVENSON Plymouth,MN 55447 Page 4 Total Building Summary Loads Component Area Sen Lat Sen Total Description Quan Loss Gain Gain Gain Low EE: Glazing-LowEE Builder Grade.31 U-value, .29 677.1 18,264 0 18,077 18,077 SHGC, Window and Patio Door, u-value 0.31, SHGC 0.29 11J: Door-Metal-Fiberglass Core 37.8 1,972 0 544 544 15A-10sffc-8: Wall-Basement, concrete block wall, R-10 1705.5 6,770 0 150 150 foam board to floor, no framing, no interior finish, filled core, 8'floor depth 15A-10sffc-4: Wall-Basement, concrete block wall, R-10 40 174 0 0 0 foam board to floor, no framing, no interior finish, filled core, 4'floor depth R20 12F-Osw:Wall-Frame, Custom, R-20 Insulation in 3704.6 21,273 0 3,252 3,252 2x6 Cavity, no board insulation, siding finish,wood studs RJ 20 Spray Foam: Wall-Frame, Custom, Rim Joist R-20 502.5 2,187 0 617 617 Closed Cell Spray Foam R49 16B-49: Roof/Ceiling-Under Attic with Insulation on 2402 4,807 0 2,652 2,652 Attic Floor(also use for Knee Walls and Partition Ceilings),Custom, R-49 Blown Insulation, No Radiant Barrier,Vented Attic,Asphalt Shingles 21A-20: Floor-Basement, Concrete slab, any thickness, 2 2279 5,354 0 0 0 or more feet below grade, no insulation below floor, any floor cover, shortest sideof floor slab is 20'wide Subtotals for structure: 60,801 0 25,292 25,292 People: 6 1,200 1,380 2,580 Equipment: 901 4,116 5,017 Lighting: 1250 4,263 4,263 Ductwork: 0 0 0 0 Infiltration:Winter CFM: 0, Summer CFM: 0 0 0 0 0 Ventilation: Winter CFM: 210, Summer CFM: 210 7,799 4,873 1,165 6,038 Humidification (Winter)21.96 gaVday : 8,052 0 0 0 AED Excursion;_..... 0 0... 3 038 3 038 Total Building Load Totals: 76,652 6,974 39,254 46,228 Check Figures Total Building Supply CFM: 1,784 CFM Per Square ft.: 0.322 Square ft. of Room Area: 5,540 Square ft. Per Ton: 1,438 Volume (ft3)of Cond. Space: 57,547 Building Loads Total Heating Required Including Ventilation Air: 76,652 Btuh 76.652 MBH Total Sensible Gain: 39,254 Btuh 85 % Total Latent Gain: 6,974 Btuh 15 % Total Cooling Required Including Ventilation Air: 46,228 Btuh 3.85 Tons (Based On Sensible+ Latent) Notes Rhvac is an ACCA approved Manual J and Manual D computer program. Calculations are performed per ACCA Manual J 8th Edition,Version 2, and ACCA Manual D. All computed results are estimates as building use and weather may vary. Be sure to select a unit that meets both sensible and latent loads according to the manufacturer's performance data at your design conditions. Thursday, September 22, 2016, 9:27 AM `Site address 780 Lakeview Parkway,Orono MN pate _ 10/4/2016 mtractor Sabre Plumbing & Heating Completed teMichael H Section A Ventilation Quantity (Determine quantity by using Table R403.5.2 or Equation 11-1) Square feet(Conditioned area Including 5540 Total required ventilation 210 Basement—finished or unfinished) 5 Continuous ventilation Number of bedrooms 105 - Directions-Determine the total and continuous ventilation rote by either using Table R403.5.2 or equotion 11-1. The table and equation are below Table R403.5.2 Total and Continuous Ventilation Rates(in cfm) Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 5 6 Conditioned space(in Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ sn.ft.) continuous continuous continuous continious •, '1 • s continuous 1000-1500 60/40 75/40 90/45 105/53 120/60 135/68 1501-2000 70/40 85/43 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73 2001-2500 80/40 95/48 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78 2501-3000 90/45 105/53 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83 3001-3500 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88 3501-4000 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78 170/85 185/93 4001-4500 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98 4501-5000 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88 190/95 205/103 5001-5500 140/70 155/78 170/85 185/93 IQ ii 215/108 i01-6000 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98 210/105 225/113 Equation 11-1 (0.02 x square feet of conditioned space)+[15 x(number of bedrooms+1)]=Total ventilation rate(cfm) Total ventilation—The mechanical ventilation system shall provide sufficient outdoor air to equal the total ventilation rate average,for each one-hour period according to the above table or equation. For heat recovery ventilators(HRV)and energy recovery ventilators(ERV)the average hourly ventilation capacity must be determined in consideration of any reduction of exhaust or out outdoor air intake,or both,for defrost or other equipment cycling. Continuous ventilation-A minimum of 50 percent of the total ventilation rate,but not less than 40 cfm,shall be provided, on a continuous rate average for each one-hour period,The portion of the mechanical ventilation system intended to be continuous may have automatic cycling controls providing the average flow rate for each hour is met. Section B Ventilation Method (Choose either balanced or exhaust only) I Balanced,HRV(Heat Recovery Ventilator)or ERV(Energy Recovery 1-1 Exhaust only Ventilator)–cfm of unit in low must not exceed continuous Continuous fan rating in cfm ventilation rating bymote thanj,00%. Low cfm: I I ^ A High cfm: , ., Continuous fan rating in cfm(capacity must not exceed I 't continuous ventilation rating by more than 100%) Directions-Choose the method of ventilation,balanced or exhaust only.Balanced ventilation systems are typically HRV or ERV's. Enter the low and high cfm amounts,Low cfm air flow must be equal to or greater than the required continuous ventilation rate and less than 100%greater than the continuous rate.(For Instance,if the low cfm is 40 cfm,the ventilation fan must not exceed 80 cfm.) Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour. Section C Ventilation Fan Schedule Description Location Continuous Intermittent Directions-The ventilation fan schedule should describe what the fan is for,the location,cfm,and whether it is used for continuous or intermittent ventilation.The fan that is chose for continuous ventilation must be equal to or greater than the low cfm air rating and less than 100%greater than the continuous rate.(For instance,if the low cfm is 40 cfm,the continuous ventilation fan must not exceed 80 cfm.)Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour. Section D Ventilation Controls (Describe operation and control of the continuous and intermittent ventilation) ERV has wall control-set to 40%=124 CFM ERV has wall control-set to 70%=217 CFM Directions-Describe the operation of the ventilation system.There should be adequate detail for plan reviewers and inspectors to verify design and installation compliance.Related trades also need adequate detail for placement of controls and proper operation of the building ventilation.If exhaust fans ore used for building ventilation,describe the operation and location of any controls,Indicators and legends.Tan ERV or HRV is to be installed,describe how it will be installed.If it will be connected and interfaced with the air handling equipment;please describe such connections as detailed in the manufactures' installation instructions.If the installation instructions require or recommend the equipment to be interlocked with the air handling equipment for proper operation,such interconnection shall be made and described. Directions-In order to determine the makeup air,Table 501.4.1 must be filled out(see below).For most new installations,column A will be appropriate,however,if atmospherically vented appliances or solid fuel appliances are installed,use the appropriate column. Please note,if the makeup air quantity is negative,no additional makeup air will be required for ventilation,if the value is positive refer to Table 501.4.2 and size the opening.Transfer the cfm,size of opening and type(round,rectangular,flex or rigid)to the last line of section D. Table 501.4.1 PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE MAKEUP AIR QUANITY FOR EXHAUST EQUIPMENT IN DWELLINGS (Additional combustion air will be required for combustion appliances,see KAIR method for calculations) One or multiple power One or multiple fan- One atmospherically vent Multiple atmospherical- vent or direct vent ap-pliances assisted appliances and power gas or oil appliance or one solid ly vented gas or oil appliances or no combus-tion appliances vent or direct vent appliances fuel appliance or solid fuel appliances Column D Column A Column B Column C 1. 0.15 0.09 0.06 0.03 a)pressure factor (cfm/sf) b)conditioned floor area(sf)(including unfinished basements) 5540 Estimated House Infiltration(cfm):(la 831 x 1b) 2.Exhaust Capacity a)continuous exhaust-only ventilation system ERV=0 (cfm);(not applicable to ba-lanced ventilation systems such as HRV) b)clothes dryer(cfm) 135 135 135 135 c)80%of largest exhaust rating(cfm); Kitchen hood typically 240 (not applicable if recirculating system or if powered makeup air is electrically interlocked d)80%of next largest exhaust rating Not (cfm);bath fan typically Applicable (not applicable if recirculating system or if powered makeup air is electrically interlocked Total Exhaust Capacity(cfm); 375 [2a+2b+2c+2d) 3.Makeup Air Quantity(cfm) — a)total exhaust capacity(from above) 375 b)estimated house infiltration(from 831 above) Makeup Air Quantity(cfm); (3a-3b] -456 (if value is negative,no makeup air is needed) 4.For makeup Air Opening Sizing,refer NOT REQ'D to Table 501.4.2 A.Use this column if there are other than fan-assisted or atmospherically vented gas or oil appliance or if there are no combustion appliances.(Power vent and direct vent appliances may be used.) B.Use this column If there is one fan-assisted appliance per venting system.(Appliances other than atmospherically vented appliances may also be included.) C.Use this column if there is one atmospherically vented(other than fan-assisted)gas or oil appliance per venting system or one solid fuel appliance. D.Use this column if there are multiple atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances using a common vent or if there are atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances and solid fule appliances. • Table 501.4.2 Makeup Air Opening Sizing Table for New and Existing Dwelling Units One or multiple power One or multiple fan- One atmospherically vented Multiple atmospherically Duct di- vent,direct vent ap- assisted appliances and gas or oil ap- vented gas or oil ap- ameter pliances,or no combus- power vent or direct vent pliance or one solid fuel pliances or solid fuel tion appliances appliances Column B appliance appliances Passive opening 1-36 1-22 1-15 1-9 3 Passive opening 37-66 23-41 16-28 10-17 4 Passive opening 67-109 42-66 29-46 18-28 5 Passive opening 110-163 67-100 47-69 29-42 6 Passive opening 164-232 _101-143 70-99 43-61 7 Passive opening 233-317 144-195 100-135 62-83 8 Passive opening 318-419 196-258 136-179 84-110 9 w/motorized damper Passive opening 420-539 259-332 180-230 111-142 10 w/motorized damper Passive opening 540-679 333-419 231-290 143-179 11 w/motorized damper Powered makeup air >679 >419 >290 >179 NA Notes: A.An equivalent length of 100 feet of round smooth metal duct is assumed.Subtract 40 feet for the exterior hood and ten feet for each 90-degree elbow to determine the remaining length of straight duct allowable. B.If flexible duct is used,increase the duct diameter by one inch.Flexible duct shall be stretched with minimal sags.Compressed duct shall not be accepted. C.Barometric dampers are prohibited in passive makeup air openings when any atmospherically vented appliance is installed. D.Powered makeup air shall be electrically interlocked with the largest exhaust system. Combustion air Not required per mechanical code(No atmospheric or power vented appliances) Passive(see IFGC Appendix E,Worksheet E-1) (Size and type Other,describe:Electric water heater, no combustion air required Explanation-If no atmospheric or power vented appliances are Installed,check the appropriate box,not required.If a power vented or atmospherically vented appliance installed,use IFGC Appendix E,Worksheet E-1(see below).Please enter size and type.Combustion air vent supplies must communicate with the appliance or appliances that require the combustion air. Section F calculations follow on the next 2 pages. Directions-The Minnesota Fuel Gas Code method to calculate to size of a required combustion air opening,is called the Known Air Infiltration Rate Method.For new construction,4b of step 4 is required to be filled out. IF--Appendix E,Worksheet E-1 ntial Combustion Air Calculation Method (._. .urnace,Boiler,and/or Water Heater in the Same Space) Step 1:Complete vented combustion appliance information. Furnace/Boiler: raft Hood Dan Assisted C)irect Vent Input: Btu/hr or Power Vent Water Heater: raft Hood E Fan Assisted ❑Direct Vent Input: Btu/hr or Power Vent Step 2:Calculate the volume of the Combustion Appliance Space(CAS)containing combustion appliances. The CAS includes all spaces connected to one another by code compliant openings. CAS volume: ft3 LxWxH LnWnH Step 3:Determine Air Changes per Hour(ACH)1 Default ACH values have been incorporated into Table E-1 for use with Method 4b(KAIR Method).If the year of construction or ACH is not known,use method 4a(Standard Method). Step 4:Determine Required Volume for Combustion Air.(DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) 4a.Standard Method Total Btu/hr input of all combustion appliances Input: Btu/hr Use Standard Method column in Table EI to find Total Required TRV: ft3 Volume(TRV) if CAS Volume(from Step 2)Is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed. If CAS Volume(from Step 2) s less th an TRV then go to STEP 5. 4b.Known Air Infiltration Rate(KAIR)Method(DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) T to/hr input of ail fan-assisted and power vent appliances Input: 0 Btu/hr Use Fan-Assisted Appliances column in Table E-1 to find RVFA: ft3 Required Volume Fan Assisted(RVFA) Total Btu/hr input of all Natural draft appliances Input: Btu/hr Use Natural draft Appliances column in Table E-1 to find RVNFA: ft3 Required Volume Natural draft appliances(RVNDA) Total Required Volume(TRV)=RVFA+RVNDA TRV= 0 + 0 = 0 TRV ft3 Step 5:Calculate the ratio of available interior volume to the total required volume. Ratio=CAS Volume(from Step 2)divided by TRV(from Step 4a or Step 4b) Ratio= 0 / 0 = Step 6:Calculate Reduction Factor(RF). RF=lminus Ratio RF=1- 0.00 = 1 .00 Step 7:Calculate single outdoor opening as if all combustion air is from outside. Total Btu/hr input of all Combustion Appliances in the same CAS Input: 0 Btu/hr (EXCEPT DIRECT VENT) Combustion Air Opening Area(CAOA): Total Btu/hr d f vl d ed by 3000 Btu/hr per in2 CAOA= 0 /3000 Btu/hr per int= 0.00 in2 Step 8:Calculate Minimum CAOA. ' um CAOA=CAOA multiplied by RF Minimum CAOA= 0.00 x 1 .00 = 0.00 in2 :Calculate Combustion Air Opening Diameter(CAOD) CAOD=1.13 multiplied by the square root of Minimum CAOA CAOD=1.13 V Minimum CAOA= in.diameter go up one inch in size if using flex duct 1 If desired,ACH can be determined using ASHRAE calculation or blower door test.Follow procedures in Section G304. IFGC Appendix E,Table E-1 Residential Combustion air(Required Interior Volume Based on Input Rating of Appliance) Input Rating Standard Method Known Air Infiltration Rate(KAIR)Method(cu ft) (Btu/hr) Fan Assisted or Power Vent Natural Draft 1994 to present Pre-1994 1994 to present Pre-1994 5,000 250 375 188 525 263 10,000 500 _750 375 11050 525 15,000 750 1,125 563 1,575 788 20,000 1,000 1,500 750 2,100 1,050 25,000 1,250 1,875 938 2,625 1,313 30,000 1,500 2,250 1,125 3,150 ,1,575 35,000 1,750 2,625 1,313 3,675 1,838 40,000 2,000 _3,000 1,500 4,200 2,100 45,000 2,250 3,375 1,688 4,725 2,363 50,000 2,500 3,750 1,675 5,250 2,625 55,000 2,750 4,125 2,063 5 775 2,888 60,000 3,000 4,500 2,250 6,300 3,150 65,000 3,250 4,875 ,2,438 6,825 3,413 70,000 3,500 5,250 2,625 7,350 3,675 75,000 3,750 5,625 ,2813 7,875 3,938 80,000 4,000 6,000 3,000 8,400 4,200 85,000 4,250 6,375 3,188 8 925 4,463 90,000 ,4,500 6,750 3,375 9,450 4,725 95,000 4,750 7,125 3,563 9,975 4,988 100,000 5,000 7,500 3,750 10,500 5,250 105,000 5,250 7,875 3,938 _11,025 5,513 110,000 5,500 8,250 4,125 11,550 5,775 115,000 5,750 8.625 4,313 12,075 6,038 120,000 _6,000 9,000 4,500 12,600 6,300 125,000 6,250y 9,375 4,688 13,125 ,6,563 130,000 6,500 9,750 4,875 13,650 6,825 135,000 6,750 ,10,125 5,063 14,175 ,7,088 140,000 7,000 10,500 5,250 14,700 7,350 145,000 7,250 10,875 5,438 15,225 7,613 150,000 7,500 11,250 5,625 ,15,750 7,875 _ 155,000 7,750 11,625 5,813 16,275 8,138 160,000 8,000 12,000 ,6,000 16,800 8,400 165,000 8,250 12,375 6,188 17,325 8,663 170,000 8,500 12,750 6,375 17,850 8,925 175,000 8,750 13,125 6,563 18,375 9,188 180,000 ,9,000 _13,500 6,750 18,900 9,450 185,000 9,250 13,875 6,938 19,425 9,713 190,000 9 500 14,250 ,7,125 19,950 9,975 195,000 9,750 ,14,625 7,313 20,475 ,10,238 200,000 10,000 15,000 7,500 21,000 10,500 205,000 _10,250 15,375 7,688 21,525 10,783 210,000 10,500 15,750 7,875 22,050 ,11,025 215,000 ,10,750 16,125 _8,063 22,575 11,288 220,000 11,000 16,500 8,250 23,100 11,550 225,000 _11,250 16,875 _8A38 23,625 11,813 230,000 11,500 _17,250 8,625 _24,150 12,075 1.The 1994 date refers to dwellings constructed under the 1994 Minnesota Energy Code.The default KAIR used in this section of the table is 0.20 ACH. 2.This section of the table is to be used for dwellings constructed prior to 1994.The default KAIR used in this section of the table is 0.40 ACH. '''' ''1,,)on 1'03 il rt,r,:i i f-- — i F 0 R T E 780 Lakeview Parkway; Orono, MN.4te * �` 01:Upper Level Member Name Results Current Solution Comments Bedroom#2 Window Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Master Bath Window Side Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Master Bath Window Rear Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Master Bedroom Window _Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 Stairway Window Front Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 Bedroom#4 Window Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Bedroom#3 Window Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 02:Main Level Member Name Results Current Solution Comments Dinette Patio Door Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Dinette Window Rear Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Dinette Window Side +Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Great Room Window Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 Drop Beam over Foyer/Great Room(H) Passed 3 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"2.0E Microllam®LVL Drop Beam over Hallway/Kitchen(H) Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 , Flush Beam over Hallway(H) Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Foyer Entry Door Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Office Window Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 1/2 Bath Window Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Drop Beam over Front Porch(H) Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Drop Beam over Front Porch(V) Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 16'Garage Door Opening Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 11 7/8"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL 9'Garage Door Opening Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 12 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 Flush Beam over Garage(H) Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"2.0E Microllam®LVL Mudroom Entry Door Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 03:Lower Level Member Name Results Current Solution Comments Sport Court Patio Door Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Game Room Window Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Game Room Patio Door Passed 2 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1/No.2 Rec Room Window Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Drop Beam over Hallway/Rec Room(H) Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Drop Beam over Hallway/Bar(H) Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL Drop Beam over Refrigerator(H) Passed 3 Piece(s)2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No.1/No.2 Guest Bedroom Window _Passed 2 Piece(s)1 3/4"x 9 1/2"1.55E TimberStrand®LSL RECEIVED DEC 012016 CITY OF ORONO Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Forte v5i. Design Engine:V6.5.1.1Je82i Doty,Design Su e:wsor Gonyea Hom-Ys-LJ6o1 L,ner umber Company 780 La e v-.'A',.,%.3,, 0',0 'IN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN 4te ,::-,i ;;;,'ym be- . .,.. n✓20 016 x.,_55'4 Page 1 of 32 a F 0 R T E ; Upper Level,Bedroom#2 Window PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" dimiimmint o 0 o a All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 3510 @ 6'4 1/2" 5738(3.00") Passed(61%) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 2404 @ 5'5 3/4" 4308 Passed(56%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 5257 @ 3'3 1/8" 5919 Passed(89%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Uve Load Den.(in) 0.056 @ 3'2 15/16" 0.208 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.089©3'2 15/16" 0.313 Passed(1/844) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). •Brad®(Lu):AII compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.81" 1283 2185 3468 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.84" 1298 2212 3510 None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) conarrents 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'3" 19' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main 2-Uniform(PSF) 2'3"to 6'6" 19 6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main Weyerhaeuser Notes SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbjwy.00m)Accessories(Rim Board,Bioddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not intended to dreumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jun on.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under tedmical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.cram/services/s_CodeRepats.aspa. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Forte v5.1.Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te j952)470-4866 Evenson Residence teffdoty@lymanIumber.com 10/2012016;#21554 Page 2 of 32 • Upper Level,Master Bath Window Side PASSED FORTE " 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:5'6" + + IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr o 0 .I, 5 X CI All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual e Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 1607 @ 1 1/2" 3825(3.00") Passed(42%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(Ibs) 1011 0 1'1/4" 2872 Passed(35%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 2014 0 2'9" 3946 Passed(51%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.023 @ 2'9" 0.175 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASO Total Load Deft.(in) 0.036 0 2'9" 0.262 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL([/360)and TL(1/240). • Bradng(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 5'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(Ibs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 597 1011 1608 None - 2-Trimmer-SPF - 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 597 1011 1608 None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 5'6" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 5'6" 10'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main Weyerhaeuser Notes •SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.nen/services/s_CodeRepats.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 323:05 PM Jeffrey Ooty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH066D Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN.4te (952)470-4866 Everson Residence jeff_doty@lymanlumber.com 10/2012018;621554 Page 3 of 32 a F 0 R T E ; Upper Level,Master Bath Window Rear PASSED " 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:2'9" + + O 0 26 4- CI o All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 374 @ 0 1913(1.50") Passed(20%) - 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 130 0 10 3/4" 2872 Passed(5%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-Its) 257 0 1'4 1/2" 3946 Passed(7%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.000 0 1'4 1/2" 0.092 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD - Total Load Deft.(in) 0.001 0 1'4 1/2" 0.138 Passed(1/999+) _ -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:a(11360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):M compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 2'9"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 230 144 374 None 2-Trimmer-SPF - - 1.50" • 1.50" 150" 230 144 374 •None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 2'9' N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'9" 3' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 2'9" N/A 100.0 - Wall-Gable Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products wit be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. 0 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY wmATIVE Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.corn/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te (952)4704866 Evenson Res dence eff_doty@lymaniumber.corr 10;20/20161#21554 Page 4 of 32 F 0 R T E " • Upper Level,Master Bedroom Window PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:11'9" 0 0 'r 3' '11'S ' ,r• 3' • 'r CI II LI All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Avowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wan Member Reaction(lbs) 5349 @ 3'3" 5738(3.00") Passed(93%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 1927 @ 4'1 3/4" 4308 Passed(45%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) -2246 @ 3'3" 5919 Passed(38%) 1.15_1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.010©5'10 9/16" 0.175 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Def.(in) 0.015 @ 5'10 9/16" 0.262 Passed(L/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 11'9"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(ibs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50° 1.50" 1.50" 402 855 1257 None 2-Trimmer--SPF 3.00" 3.00" - •2.80" 1955- 3393 5348 None 3-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.75" 1919 3334 5253 None• 4-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 281 643 924 None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Sail Weight(PLF) 0 to 11'9" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 10'9" 19'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main 2-Uniform(PSF) 10'9"to 11'9" 12' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuserru design values. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,BlockingPanels andsoftware. Use for installation re Is n circumvent the need for a designSquash Blocks)are not tion.designed by this software. builderof software Is not Intended to g professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record, or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser Willies are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www•woodbywy.com/servkws/s_CodeReports.aspc. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine.V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway; Orono,MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jeff_doty@lymanIumber.com 10/20/2076,#21554 Page 5 of 32 • a F 0 R T E " Upper Level,Stairway Window Front PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:2'9" + + o 0 2'6' C • Q All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:War Member Reaction(Ibs) 1484 @ 0 1913(1.50") Passed(78%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 517 @ 10 3/4" 2872 Passed(18%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 1020 @ 1'4 1/2" 3946 Passed(26%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Bulking Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(In) 0.003 @ 1,4 1/2' 0.092 Passed((/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(In) 0.005 @ 1'4 1/2" 0.138 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):AS compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 2'9"o/c tniess detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is naquired to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(Be) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessions. 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50' 1.50' 1.50" 546 938 1484 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" - .130' - 130" .. 546- 938 1484 None- - .. - Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Contents 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0to2'9' N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'9" 19'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main ]y�� Weyerhaeuser Notes- - -- - - - IZj)SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Y� Weyerhaeuser a pussy disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bioddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responside to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.conyservices/s_CodeReports.aspo. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23'05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1. Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780'_akeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono. MN.4te 1952)470-4866 Everson Residence . jeff_doty©iymanlumher.cum 10'20/2016;#21554 Page 6 of 32 , FORTE ' Upper Level,Bedroom#4 Window PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" + + o amilimmilt0 C 6' 0 Q All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal,;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDP Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) _ 884 @ 1 1/2" 3825(3.00") Passed(23%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 606 @ 1'1/4" 2872 Passed(21%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 1328 @ 3'3" 3946 Passed(34%) 1.15 1.0 D+1,0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load DeFl.(in) 0.013 @ 3'3" 0.208 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load DeFl,(in) 0.034 @ 3'3" 0.313 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) _ • Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(L/240). • Bradng(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attadtment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 543 341 884 None — 2-Trimmer-SPF - 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 543 341 884 None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 3' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 100.0 - Wall-Gable Weyerhaeuser Notes `^� Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizingof its Y SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. YYY Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by IOC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbwry.corn/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23'.05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5 1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway.Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jaff doty.OIymanIumber.corn 10:202015:#21554 Page7of32 1 F 0 R T E ' Upper Level,Bedroom#3 Window PASSED �l 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" NI+ + o 0 6 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 3520 @ 1 1/2" 5738(3.00") Passed(61%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 2414 @ 1'1/4" 4308 Passed(56%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 5288 @ 3'3" 5919 Passed(89%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl,(In) 0.056 @ 3'3" 0.208 Passed(L/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.089 @ 3'3" 0.313 Passed(L/838) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(L1360)and TL(L/240). •Bracing(Lu):M compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing . Loads to Supports(Ws) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.84" 1302 2218 3520 None 2-Trimmer-SPF- • 3.00" -3.00" - 1.84" • - 1302- 2218 3520 - None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6' N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to ti 6' 19'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main Weyerhaeuser Notes /� - Z SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INATNE - ITIY Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation detais. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocldng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.cum/servkes/s_CodeReports.aspor. The product application,Input design bads,dimensions and support Inforrrabon have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes - 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN.4te 19521 470-4866 Evanson Residence jelf_doly^a!ymanlumber corn 10.127/2013'421554 Page 8 of 32 F 0 R T E " Main Leve!,Dinette Patio Door PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:3'8" + + o 0 4' 3'2' 'r o a All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wet Member Reaction(lbs) 6864 @ 1 1/2" 7613(3.00") Passed(90%) _ -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 6822©1'1/2" 7902 Passed(86%) 1.15_1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 7690 @ 1'3" 11985 Passed(64%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Def.(in) 0.041 @ 1'3" 0.114 Passed(L/990) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD - Total Load Defl.(in) 0.066 @ 1'3" 0.171 Passed(L/619) -- _1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and Ti.(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):AU compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 3'8"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bradng is required to achieve member stability. ._..- Dearing...7 : .: -z-_ iSirdstrrStworts(etf).:. •. Supportsor Total Available Required Dead ive Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.70" _ 2578 116 4286 6980 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.90" 1880 81 2946 4907 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Seff Weight(PLF) 0 to 3'8" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1'3" 2' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level 2-Point(Ib) 1'3" N/A 3240 - 5670 Girder 3-Uniform(PLF) 1'3"to 3'8" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PSF) 1'3"to 2'9" 10'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 5-Uniform(PSF) 1'3"to 3'8" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level Linked from:Master 6-Point(lb) 2'9" N/A 597 - 1011 Bath Window Side, Support 1 Weyerhaeuser Notes 4 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bioddrg Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the author ty having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.mrn/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor - Gonyea Homes-GH3660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 750 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway.Orono. MN.4ie (952)470-4516 Evenson Residence jeff_doty@lyminkimber.com l0'2012015 #21554 Page 9 of 32 iii F O R T E " Main Level,Dinette Window Rear PASSED . 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:12'1" + + . o 0 • X 3'6" % 3'6" X�. 3'6" 0 o a El All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LOP Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 1945 @ 0 1913(1.50") Passed(102%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Alt Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 1350 @ 9'2 3/4" 2498 Passed(54%) 1,00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) -1820 @ 3'11 1/2" 3431 Passed(53%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Uve Load Dell(In) 0.009 @ 10'1 15/16" 0.132 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Dell.(in) 0.013 @ 1'10 9/16" 0.198 Passed(1)999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Alt Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 12'1"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead LP Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.53" 945 1001/-125 320 2266/-125 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 3.74" ' 2047 2717 ._ 490 5254 keine 3-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 3.74" 2047 2717 490 5254 None 4-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 715 1001/-125 176 1892/-125 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 12'1" 14' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 12'1" 3' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 4-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 100.0 - - Waft-Gable Linked from:Master 5-Point(Ib) 0 N/A 230 - 144 Bath Window Rear, Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes Op Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be in accordance with WeyerhaeuserSUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser expressly disdains arty other warranties related to the software.Refer to curentpW designe tikes and published design values. Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation dda85. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlitiea are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/at tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to htip://www.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te 1952)470-4866 Everson Residence ler oty©Iymanlumber.com 10!2012016:x21554 Page 10 0132 F 0 R T E • Main Level,Dinette Window Side PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:3'9" + 1111111111111111 + 0 0 3 6' 0 9 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal-;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual®Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 1274 @ 0 1913(1.50") Passed(67%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(Ibs) 665 @ 10 3/4" 2872 Passed(23%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-Ibs) 1194 CO 1'10 1/2" 3946 Passed(30%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.006 @ 1'10 1/2" 0.125 Passed(1/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defi.(in) 0.011 @ 1'10 1/2" 0.188 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1./360)and TL(1/240). •Bradng(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 3'9"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. _ Bearing Loads to Supports(Ibs) Supports Total Available Required Deade FiciSnow Total Accessories Liv1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 585 75 689 1349 None - 2-711m/tier-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 585 75 689 1.349 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 3'9' N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 3'9' N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3'9' 10'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3'9' 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level Weyerhaeuser Notes Y /� SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Y Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation detals. (www.wuodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having Jurisdiction.The designer of record,bulkier or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlitles are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.conyservkes/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GHO660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN.4te (952)470-4366 Everson Residence 1leff_doty@lyrr.anlumber corn 10/2012016#21554 Page 11 of 32 F O R T E " Main Level, Great Room Window PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:13'7" a 0 .4.• 4' ,t•£� 4 x 4' CI 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AB dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing Is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result WE Load:Combination(Patter.) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 2821 @ 13'7" 2869(1.50") Passed(98%) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(Alt Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 3688 @ 5'6 3/4" 4308 Passed(86%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 4828 @ 11'6" 5919 Passed(82%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(In) 0.018 0 11'6 1/16" 0.149 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(AR Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.029 0 11'6 9/16" 0.223 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(Alt Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):Al compression edges(top and rattan)must be braced at 12'8 5/8°o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(ms) Supports Total Available Required Dead Floor L Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 1094 805/-99 1353 3252/-99 None 2-Trimmer-SPF - 8.00" 8.00" 4.12" 3276 2181 3964 9421 None v 3-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 3.91" 3179 2181 3559 8919 None 4-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 1165 805/-99 1403 3373/-99 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (L15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) Oto 13'7" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 13'7" 10' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 13'7" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3' 1.9'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main Linked from:Master 4-Point(Ib) 3' N/A 402 - 855 Bedroom Window, Support 1 Linked from:Master 5-Point(Ib) 6'3" N/A 1955 - 3393 Bedroom Window, Support 2 Linked from:Master 6-Point(Ib) 11'6" N/A 1919 - 3334 Bedroom Window, Support 3 Weyerhaeuser Notes 0 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.corn/servk:es/s_CodeRcpats.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumbar Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jeff_doty@lymanIumber.com 10(20/2016;#21554 Page 12 of 32 FO R T E Main Level,Drop Beam over Foyer/Great Room(H) PASSED 3 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 2.0E Microllam® LVL Overall Length:10'6" 11111111111161111111.11111111111L + o 0 r, 10'6" 4" x 0 Q All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor - Member Reaction(Ibs) 5783 @ 1 1/2" 11419(3.00") Passed(51%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(Ibs) 4515 @ 1'1/2" 9476 Passed(48%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 13019 @ 4'9" 17662 Passed(74%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Def.(in) 0.251 @ 5'1 9/16" 0.342 Passed(L/490) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.350 @ 5'1 9/16" 0.512 Passed(L/351) -- 1.0 0+1.0 L(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and 11(11240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 10'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. Bearing-._ r._iA4dt10.$uppctta.Libs):-_-.:_ _.•__.....r__ Suppo isTotal Available Required Dead - Floor Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.52" 1633 4150 5783 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 1164 2900 4064 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (Loo) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 10'6" N/A 14.5 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'(Front) 21'10 1/2" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PSF) 6'to 10'6"(Front) 10' 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level Weyerhaeuser Notes 0SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly c isdalms any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,bulder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.conyservkes/s_CadeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-3H0460 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jeff__dotyclymanIumber.--.orn 10/20(2016.721554 Page 13 of 32 Main Level,Drop Beam over Hallway/Kitchen(H) PASSED a F O R T E ` 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:3'7" 111111.11111.1111 + + o 0 3 4" 0 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(lbs) 2729 0 0 2869(1.50") Passed(95%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(lbs) 1364 @ 10 3/4" 3746 Passed(36%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 2445 @ 1'9 1/2" 5147 Passed(47%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Def,(in) 0.010 0 1'9 1/2" 0.119 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASO Total Load Dell.(In) 0.014©1'9 1/2" 0.179 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(L(360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 3'7"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) StIplsFloor Total Available Required Dead tJva Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 758 1971 2729 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 758 1971 2729 None Tributary Dead floor live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 3'7" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3'7"(Front) 27'6" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level Weyerhaeuser Notes (ZjJ SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panes and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having junsd ctlon.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and FSR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For cement code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.conyservloes/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23.05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1.Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono.MN.4te ;952)470-4865 Evenson Residence err_ioty.�iymanlumer corn 1020(2013:221554 Page 14 of 32 ,i_1 F 0 R T C " Main Level,Flush Beam over Hallway(H) PASSED . 1 r I� G 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:7' + IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr + o 0 .. 4 7 x 0 p All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing Is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(lbs) 4115 @ 6'10 1/2" 7613(3.00") Passed(54%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Flush Beam Shear(lbs) 2884 @ 1'1/2" 6872 Passed(42%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 6595 @ 3'6 3/16" 10422 Passed(63%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Dell.(in) 0.122 @ 3'6 1/16" 0.169 Passed(L/666) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Dell.(in) 0.169 @ 3'6 1/16" 0.338 Passed(L/480) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) — • Deflection criteria:LL(L/480)and TL 04249). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 7 o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bradng is required to achieve member stability. .:.._ _.." _ _-:Bearing_- l.QaAr.to.Suppotts£lbs),_- .. Supports Total Available _ Required Dead Fi a Total Accessories _1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.51" 1069 2754 3823 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.62" 1149 2966 4115 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to T N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1'(Front) 16' 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PSF) 1'to 6'(Front) 21' 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 6'to 7'(Front) 22' 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level Weyerhaeuser Notes 0 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Y Weyerhaeuser expressly disdaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsdfle to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have teen evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy,com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. 1 Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono HN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jot!.doty lymanlumber corn 10120/2014:#2-1554 Page 15 of 32 F O R T E " Main Level,Foyer Entry Door PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:5'6" + 11111111111111111L + o 0 4' 5' 4' O El All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual le Location AYowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattem) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 3760©1 1/2" 5738(3.00") Passed(66%) — 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 2404 @1 4'5 3/4" 4308 Passed(56%) 1.15 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 4677 0 2'8 13/16" 5919 Passed(79%) 1.15 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.031 @ 2'8 3/4" 0.175 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Deft(in) 0.056 C 2'8 3/4" 0.262 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(L/240). •Bradng(Lu):An compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 5'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise,Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(Drs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Floor Snow Total Accessories Live 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.97" 1678 803 1973 4454 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00' 3.00" 1.86" 1582 547 1973 4102 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) Oto56" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 4'6" 7'6" 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 5'6" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) Oto 5'6" 19'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Matt 4-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 5'6" 1' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Porch Weyerhaeuser Notes SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the string of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disdains any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bbddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.corn(services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-31-10660Forte v5.1.Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN.4te (952)470-4866 Everson Residence ierf_doty'La�,lymartumber.con 10/20'2016:#21554 Page 16 0l 32 • F 0 R T E " Main Level,Office Window PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" 0 o El 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF_Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 2774 @ 1 1/2" 3825(3.00") Passed(73%) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 1409 @ 1'1/4" 2498 Passed(56%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential • Moment(Ft-lbs) 3086 @ 3'3" 3431 Passed(90%) 1.00_1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Bullring Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defi.(in) 0.045 @ 3'3" 0.208 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD — Total Load Def.(in) 0.078 @ 3'3" 0.313 Passed(L/957) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) . Supports Total Available Required Dead Floor the Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.18" 1427 1170 625 3222 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00 2.18" 1427 1170 625 3222 None _ Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 9' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6 6" 2'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Porch Unked from: 4-Point(lb) 0 N/A 543 - 341 Bedroom#4 Window,Support 1 Unked from: 5-Point(Ib) 6'6" N/A 543 - 341 Bedroom#4 Window,Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes •SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing Of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. y� Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocldng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gony a;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH066b Forte v5.1.Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te (952)470-4856 Everson Residence jeff_duty':Iymaniumoer cam 10120/201 y:#21554 Page 17 of 32 F 0 R T E ' Main Level, 1/2 Bath Window PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:2'4 1/2" + + o 0 4 2 4- 0 Q 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDP Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 5261 @ 1 1/2" 7613(3.00") Passed(69%) _ --_ 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:header Shear(Ibs) 301 @ 1'1/2" 7902 Passed(4%) 1.15 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 914 @ 1'3" 11985 Passed(8%) 1.15 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 live Load Dell.(in) 0.003 @ 1'3" 0.075 Passed(L/999+) — 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(In) 0.006 @ 1'3" 0.112 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):AU compression edges(tap and bottom)must be braced at 2'4 1/2"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. _ _--Betttin9 L-Ad1SD.Ssworta OW SuPPortsFloor Total Available Required Dead Lie Snow Total Accessories i 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.07" 2102 400 3159 5661 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 720 360 847 1927 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (L00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 2'4 1/2" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'4 1/2" 8' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 2'4 1/2" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'4 1/2" W 6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Main 4-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 7 4 1/2" 2' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Monos Linked from: 5-Point(Ib) 0 N/A 1302 - 2218 Bedroom#3 W-rndow,Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes 0 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the siring of Its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. YY Weyerhaeuser expressly disdains any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddrg Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to dreumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.wooibywy.taco/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Goryea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5-1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te 1,9521 470-4866 Evenson Residence ieff_doty@lymanlumber.nom 10,20120161 421554 Page 18 of 32 • • F 0 R T E " Main Level,Drop Beam over Front Porch(H) PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:13'6" + + o 0 „ a o All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual®Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Patten) System:Roof Member Reaction(lbs) 1956 @ l'8 3/4” 10519(5.50") Passed(19%) -- _ 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(Ibs) 1251 @ 2'8 3/4" 4308 Passed(29%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 4087 @ 7'6 7/16" 5919 Passed(69%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.142 @ 7 5 5/8" 0.381 Passed(1/967) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.230 @ 7'5 3/4" _ 0.572 Passed(11597) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Member Pitch:0/12 •Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). •Overhang deflection criteria:LL(21/360)and TL(21/240). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 13'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NOS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories _ 1-Column SPF. 5.50" 5.50" 1.50 762 - 1194 _ ._1956 Blocking 2-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 1.50" 595 943 1538 Blocking •Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 13'6" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 13'6"(Front) 4'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Porch Weyerhaeuser Notes _. . _. SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,budder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/servkxs/s_CodeReports.aspa. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman_umber Comor:ny 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,tiN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN.4te X952)470-4866 Evenson Residence Leif_d,t:'t tyrnaniumber can 10;20/2014:#21554 Page 19 Of 32 ri1 F O R T E ." Main Level,Drop Beam over Front Porch(V) PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:7'6" • + + o 0 • 7'6" _ CI o All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual @ Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Roof Member Reaction(lbs) 1367 @ 4" 7013(5.50") Passed(19%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(lbs) 919 @ 1'2 3/4" 2872 Passed(32%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 2128 @ 3'9" 3946 Passed(54%) 1.15 1.0 D+ 1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.040 @ 3'9" 0.228 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Deti.(in) 0.065 @ 3'9" 0.342 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Pitch:0/12 •Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(L/240). •Brading(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 7'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bradng Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Requited Dead Snow Total Aaoesaories 1-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 1.50" 514 853 1367 Blocking 2—Stud wall-SPF - 530" 5.50"• 1.50". -514 853 - 1367 Bioddng •Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above thee and the full load Is applied to the member being designed. Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Sett Weight(PLF) 0 to 7'6" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 7'6"(Front) 6'6" 20.0 35.0 Snow-Porch Weyerhaeuser Notes (^�J SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products wit be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. YYY Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocldrg Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not Intended to dreumvr t the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadiitles are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For cement code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.cont/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0680 Lyman Lumbar Company 783 Lakeview Parkv.av:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN.4te ,9521470-4896 Evenson Residence elf_dotyL,Liymank:mber.cam 10/20/20 5:421554 Page 20 of 32 fI r O R T E 4Marn Level, 16'Garage Door Opening PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 11 7/8" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:20' + + O 0 2 4. 16' x 2 j 0 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF- Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 2786 @ 18'1 1/2" 7613(3,00") Passed(37%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 1954 @ 2'11 7/8" 9878 Passed(20%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 8779 @ 10' 18346 Passed(48%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Aft Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.223 @ 10' 0.542 Passed(L/874) 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASD — Total Load Defl.(In) 0.579 @ 10' 0.813 Passed(L/337) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). •Overhang deflection asteria:LL(21/360)and TL(21./240). •Bradng(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 13'7 1/4"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bradng Is required to achieve member stability. Bearing Loads to Supporta(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.50" 1730 1056 2786 None 2-Trimmer-SPF - - - 3.00" 3.00"-- - -1.50" -1730 1056 2786 --None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments - 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 20' N/A 13.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0W 20' 3' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Garage 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 20' N/A 100.0 - Wall-Gable /� Weyerhaeuser Notes 4 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products wit be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.cam)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.wcodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. CadeReports. px. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Forte v5.1. Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 g 9 Lyrran Lumber Company 730 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN.4te 19521470-436S Everson Residence :e;f doly`lymanlumher.:oro '10'7!0,2016'321554 Page 21 of 32 . FORTE ' Main Level,9'Garage Door Opening PASSED 3 piece(s) 2 x 12 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:13' + + O 0 1, 2' 9 2' All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result I.DF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall . Member Reaction(lbs) 5496 @ 1'10 1/2" 5738(3.00") Passed(96%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 3035 @ 2'11 1/4" 5240 Passed(58%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 7949 @ 6'6" 7960 Passed(100%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(Aft Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.104 @ 6'6" 0.308 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASO Total Load Defl.(in) 0.160 @ 6'6" 0.463 Passed(L/695) -- _1.0 D+1.0 S(Alt Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TI.(1/240). • Overhang deflection criteria:LL(2L/360)and TL(21./240). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Snow Total Accessories -Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" _ .2.87" 2033. 3462. 5495 . None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.87" 2033 3462 5495 None Tributary Dead Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.15) Comments 0-Serf Weight(PLF) 0 to 13' N/A 12.8 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 13' 15' 20.0 35.0 Snow-Garage /� Weyerhaeuser Notes `2}J SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,budder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.co r/servlces/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. I Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te 052)470-4866 Evensor Residence Jeff doty@lymarlum0ar corn 10`20:20.16.421554 Page 22 of 32 • _ Main Level,Flush Beam over Garage(H) PASSED ' ' FORTE .,R T E 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 2.0E Microllam® LVL Overall Length:8' o 0 t 8 . 4. 0 Q All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(Ibs) 5930 @ 3" 5930(2.26") Passed(100%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Flush Beam Shear(lbs) 4830 @ 1'1/2" 7265 Passed(66%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 12648 @ 4'6 1/16" 13541 Passed(93%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Deft(in) 0.162 @ 4'1/16" 0.185 Passed(1/548) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Def.(in) 0.285 @ 4'1/16" 0.371 Passed(1/312) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) — •Deflection criteria:a(1/480)and TL(1/240). • Bracing(Lu):Al compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 5'5 1/4"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. .. . Supports Total Available Required ` Dead lFll! Snow Total Accessories 1-Hanger on 9 1/2"SPF beam 3.00" Hanger: 2.26" 2741 950 3534 7225 See note 1 2-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 2.07" 2386 970 2866 6222 Blocking - •Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. — •At hanger supports,the Total Bearing dimension Is equal to the width of the material that is supporting the hanger • r See Connector grid below for additional information and/or requirements. Connector:Simpson Stron -Tie Connectors Support Model Seat Length Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Accessories 1-Face Mount Hanger HGUS410 4.00" N/A 46-16d common 16-16d double shear Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads LocationLSlde) width • (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Continents_ 0-Self Weight(PLF) 3"to 8' N/A 9.7 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 8'(Front) 6' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 2-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 8'(Front) 3' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Monos 3-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 8'(Front) N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 4'(Front) 19' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 5-Uniform(PSF) 4'to 5'(Front) _ 19'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main Linked from: 6-Point(lb) 5'(Front) N/A 1302 - 2218 Bedroom#3 Window,Support 1 Weyerhaeuser Notes @SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disdaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having Jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports FSR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://mwrmoodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Je7rey Dory.Design Supervisor Gonyee Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine.V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lak-n naw Parkway Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN.4te 1 (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence ler(do:yo�lymani.imber corn 10/20'2016 #21554 Page 23 of 32 I F 0 R T E d Main Level,Mudroom Entry Door PASSED 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:3'1" + + o a 2'10" 111 CI All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 1760 @ 0 1913(1.50") Passed(92%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 737 @ 10 3/4" 2498 Passed(30%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 1356 @ 1'6 1/2" 3431 Passed(40%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.006 @ 1'6 1/2" 0.103 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Dell.(In) 0.008©1'6 1/2" 0.154 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(L/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 3'1"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable caladatlons are based on NDS. Bearing loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead L�ivoar Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 488 1272 1760 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 488 1272 1760 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 3'1" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3'1' 20'7 1/2" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level //�� Weyerhaeuser Notes (lam SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. err Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warrenWs related to the software.Refer to arrant Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser faditties are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product appicatlon,input design loads,dknenslons and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GHC660 Forte v5.1.Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono, MN.4te ;952)470-4866 Evenson Residence Jeff dotyalymunlumber.corn 1020/2016,'121554 Page 24 of 32 • a F O R T E s Lower Level,Sport Court Patio Door PASSED r Ii G 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" + + o o 4' 6 4' a o All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing Is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 3496 @ 1 1/2" 5738(3.00") Passed(61%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 2398 @ 1'1/4" 4308 Passed(56%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 5252 @ 3'3" 5919 Passed(89%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.043 @ 3'3" 0.208 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Def.(in) 0.089 @ 3'3" 0.313 Passed(1./844) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(/360)and TL(1/240). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and txxtom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing - . Loads to Supports(Ors) Supports Total Available Required Dead Moor Snow Total Accessories Live , 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 1.83" 1789 260 1706 3755 None 2-Trimmer-SPF - 3.00" 3.00" 1.83" 1789 260 1706 3755 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Maln Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 90.0 - - Wal-Main Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 5-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 3' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 6-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 40.0 - - Wall-Gable 7-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 12' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Sport Court /� Weyerhaeuser Notes (, )SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. �r Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.coryseryices/s_CodeRepo.ts.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 7iTC Lakeview Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono,M1\1.4te [952)470-43E6 Evanson Residence jeff_dotyilymanlumber.cam 10:2C/2016.#21554 Page 25 0132 • ✓a F 0 R T E " • Lower Level, Game Room Window PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length: 12'1" o n 3'6" ' 3'6" ', X 3'6" •f, •i' 4' 0 2 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AlI dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Amus @ Location Allowed Resuk LDF Load:Combination(Pattern)(Group) System:Wal Member Reaction(lbs) 3631 @ 0 3806(1.50") Passed(95%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Aft Spans)[1] Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 3864 @ 9'3" 6872 Passed(56%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans)[1) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) -3620 @ 8'1 1/2" 10422 Passed(35%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans)[1] Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Deft.(in) 0.023 @ 10'7/16" 0.132 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Alt Spans)[1] Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Deft.(in) 0.035 @ 10'11/16" 0.198 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(Alt Spans)[1] •Deflection crrteria:LL(1/360)and TL(4240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 12'1"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. Beating_. _. . Lortds:tonpports 11hs).__: Supports Total Available Required Dead IFiJ a Snow Total Accessories 1-Trknmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 1417 2214/-307 301 3932/-307 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 3.61" 3470 5687 562 9719 None 3-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 3.72" 3625 5824 544 9993 None 4-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 727 1405/-213 67 2199/-213 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 12'1' 14' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 90.0 - - Wall-Maki Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1' 14' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 1' N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 5-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1' 3' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 6-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 1' N/A 100.0 - - Wall-Gable Unload from:Dinette 7-Point(Ib) 1' N/A 945 1001/-125 320 Window Rear, SUpport 1 Linked from:Dinette 8-Point(Ib) 4'9" N/A 2047 2717 490 Window Rear, Support 2 Linked from:Dinette 9-Point(Ib) 9' N/A 2047 2717 490 Window Rear, Support 3 Weyerhaeuser Notes 4 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INiTIATNE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbyvry.00m)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to dreur>rent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or harmer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overaN project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser fadlitles are third-party certified to sustainable forestay standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.caryservices/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 'S0 Lakeview Parkway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evanson Residence jelf_dolya2';mankanner-nom t 0120/2016:#21554 Page 26 of 32 ' ..-11F Lower Level, Game Room Patio Door PASSED 0 R T E 2 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:6'6" + + o 0 6' CI o All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing Is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF -Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 2594 @ 6'4 1/2" 3825(3.00") Passed(68%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 1793 @ 5'5 3/4" 2872 Passed(62%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 2906 @ 1'8 5/8" 3946 Passed(74%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.035©3'2 3/16" 0.208 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.078 @ 3'2 3/8" 0.313 Passed(1/962) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and Ti_(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve mernber stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Floor Snow Total AccesLivesories — 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.03" 1379 262 1208 2849 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00" 2.03" 1383 262 1211 2856 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Wider (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comment, 0-Set Weight(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 7.0 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 6'6" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 6'6" N/A 90.0 - - Wall-Main Level 3-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 1'8" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1'8" 10'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 5-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1'8" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 6-Uniform(PLF) 5 4"to 6'6" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 7-Uniform(PSF) S 4"to 6'6" 10'6" 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Main 8-Uniform(PSF) S 4"to 6'6" 1' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level Unked from:Dinette 9-Point(Ib) 1'8" N/A 585 75 689 Window Side, Support 1 Linked from:Dinette 10-Point(Ib) S 4" N/A 585 75 689 Window Side, Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes ()SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty,Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0680 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakevie.v Parkway:0,010,MN 780 Lakeview ;Parkwa Orono, MN.4te (9521 470-4866 Evenson Residence y jell dotyVlymaniumber corn 10,20'2010:-21554 Page 27 of 32 • ✓- F 0 R T E ' Lower Level,Rec Room Window PASSED , 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length: 12'1" iiiiimmiw + + 0 0 4. 3'6" 4‘ 3'6" ,, , 3'6" x 0 o a CI All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(Ibs) 10419©3'11 1/2" 15300(8.00") Passed(68%) — 1.0 0+0.75 L+0.75 S(Adj Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(Ibs) 1394 @ 2'10 1/4" 3746 Passed(37%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) -2261©3'11 1/2" 5147 Passed(44%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(Adj Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.008 @ 2'15/16" 0.132 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(Alt Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Def.(In) 0.013 @ 2'3/4" 0.198 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(AR Spans) _ • Deflection arReria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 12'1"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. •Applicable calculations are based on NDS. .Bearing Loads to Supports(los) Supports Total Available Required Dead Roor Live Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 606 858/-90 260 1724/-90 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 5.45" 4380 4110 3942 12432 None 3-Trimmer-SPF 8.00" 8.00" 5.08" 4062 4122 3414 11598 None 4-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 434 743/-90 51 1228/-90 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (L15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 12'1" 10' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 12'1" N/A 90.0 - - Wall-Main Level Linked from:Great 3-Point(Ib) 3'6" N/A 3276 2181 3964 Room Window, Support 2 Linked from:Great 4-Point(Ib) 8'3" N/A 3179 2181 3559 Room Window, Support 3 Weyerhaeuser Notes SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY wmATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www,woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bbddrg Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,bulkier or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible wits the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeRepats.aspx. The product application,Input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Forte v5.1. DesignEngine:V6.5.1.1 , Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 9 Lyman Lumber Compan; 780 Lakeviesv Parkway:Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway; Orono, MN.4fe (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jeff_doty:atymanlumber:om 10:23%2016:421554 Page 28 of 32 Lower Level, Drop Beam over Hallway/Rec Room(H) PASSED F 0 R T E 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:8'7" o 0 r 8" 0 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are hordzontai.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual®Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(lbs) 5208 @ 4" 13956(5.50") Passed(37%) _ -- _1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(lbs) 3691 @ 1'3" 6872 Passed(54%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 9507 @ 4'3 1/2" 10422 Passed(91%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Dell.(In) 0.230 @ 4'3 1/2" 0.264 Passed(L/413) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Dell.(in) 0.319 @ 4'3 1/2" 0.396 Passed(L/298) _ -- _1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(1/240). • Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 6'6 9/16"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. _.: :...__Loads teSsiopTR/3lbs)-._:.r::_,. - ...._.,. SupportsTotal Available Required Dead F ve Total Accessories 1-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 2.05" 1453 3755 5208 Blocking 2-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 2.05" 1453 3755 5208 Bloddng •Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 8'7" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 8'7"(Front) 21'10 1/2" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Main Level Weyerhaeuser Notes i�)S ITA1NABIE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Y Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.wood ywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to tittp://www.woodtrywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;pian dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te X952/470-4866 Evenson Residence Jeff_doty©lymaniumher.nom 10/20/20 i6.»21554 Page 29 of 32 if 1 F 0 R T E ` Lower Level, Drop Beam over Hallway/Bar(H) PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:4'8" + + O 0 3'9' 0 0 All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combin tion(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(lbs) 7618 @ 4" 13956(5.50") Passed(55%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(Ibs) 3711 @ 1'3" 6872 Passed(54%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 5558 @ 1'7 9/16" 10422 Passed(53%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Def.(in) 0.045 @ 2'3 3/8" 0.133 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:Ash Total Load Defl.(in) 0.063 @ 2'3 3/8" 0.200 Passed(L/758) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) • Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(L/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 4'8"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing Is required to achieve member stability. ._. ____ __lam_ .—::--- _loads o 9epPods(lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Floor Total Accessories Live 1-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 3.00" 2192 5426 7618 Bloddng 2-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50' 2.90" 2051 5300 7351 Bloddng •Blocking Panels are assumed to cany no loads applied directly above them and the full load Is applied to the member being designed. Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 4'8" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 4'8"(Front) 27'6" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 1'6"(Front) N/A 90.0 - Wall-Main Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 1'6"(Front) 27 6" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level Unked from:Drop 4-Point(Ib) 1'6"(Front) N/A 758 1971 Scamover Halhvay/latches(H), Support 1 Unked from:Drop 5-Point(Ib) 4'8"(Front) N/A 758 1971 Beam over Harway/lOtclren(H), Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes warrants that0 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser sizing products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design accent and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need fora design professional as determined by the authority having Jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are t Ird-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports FSR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://bwiw.woodbywy.com/services/s_CodeReports.aspx. ports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator .Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Dory.Desgn Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Comoany 760 Lakevie,.v Parkway:Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono, MN.4te (952)470-48666 Evanson Residence Jeff doty lym3nivmber.:::nni 10/'2012016-.821554 Page 30 of 32 �� t Lower Level,Drop Beam over Refrigerator(H) PASSED �1 F O R T 3 piece(s) 2 x 10 Spruce-Pine-Fir No. 1 / No. 2 Overall Length:3'11" + + 0 0 it 3' 4 1' 1:1 IA All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing is Conceptual Design Results Actual®Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Floor Member Reaction(lbs) 7595 @ 3'7" 10519(5.50") Passed(72%) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Member Type:Drop Beam Shear(lbs) 2047 @ 2'8 1/4" 3746 Passed(55%) 1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 2959 0 2'4 3/16" 5147 Passed(57%) _1.00 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defi.(in) 0.010 0 2'7/16" 0.108 Passed(L/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Den.(in) 0.014 @ 2'7/16" 0.162 Passed(L/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 L(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(L/360)and TL(1/240). •Bracing(Lu):An compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 3'11"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. • Applicable calculations are based on NDS. Bearing Loads to Supports(lbs) Supportsnoor Total Available Required Dead L ve Total Accessories 1-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 1.79" 952 2466 3418 Bloddng 2-Column-SPF 5.50" 5.50" 3.97" 2157 5438 7595 Bloddng - •Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. Tributary Dead Floor Live Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 3'11" N/A 10.6 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 3'11"(Front) 26'3" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 3'2"to 3'11" N/A 90.0 - Wall-Main Level (Front) 3-Uniform(PSF) 3'2"to 3'11" 27'6" 15.0 40.0 Floor-Upper Level (Frond) Linked from:Flush 4-Point(Ib) 3'2"(Front) N/A 1149 2966 Beam over Hallway (H).Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes (Z)SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITWTNE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products win be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. ll Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation detain. (www.woodeywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software is not intended to drcumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.cornVservkrs/s_CodeReports.aspx. The product application,input design loads,dimensions and support information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Dory.Design Supervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1,Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780'_akeVew Poruway;Orono.MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN.4te 19521,17U-4865 Everson Residence y j aff_doty2!yn:anlumber.corn 10'20;2n16.#21554 1 Page 31 of 32 'F O R T E < Lower Level, Guest Bedroom Window PASSED 2 piece(s) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" 1.55E TimberStrand® LSL Overall Length:2'10 1/2" 0 0 J 2'6" X CI Q All locations are measured from the outside face of left support(or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal.;Drawing Is Conceptual Design Results Actual 0 Location Allowed Result LDF Load:Combination(Pattern) System:Wall Member Reaction(lbs) 3552 @ 2'10 1/2" 3806(1.50") Passed(93%) -- 1.0 D+0.75 L+0.75 S(All Spans) Member Type:Header Shear(lbs) 2781 @ 1'1/2" 7902 Passed(35%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Use:Residential Moment(Ft-lbs) 3087 @ 10 1/2" 11985 Passed(26%) 1.15 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Building Code:IBC 2012 Live Load Defl.(in) 0.012 @ 10 1/2" 0.092 Passed(L/999+) — 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) Design Methodology:ASD Total Load Defl.(in) 0.021 @ 10 1/2" 0.138 Passed(1/999+) -- 1.0 D+1.0 S(All Spans) •Deflection criteria:LL(1/360)and TL(L/240). •Bracing(Lu):All compression edges(top and bottom)must be braced at 2'10 1/2"o/c unless detailed otherwise.Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. _„ > Laada3oslt(l�ottta�lba)- SUPPOttsFloor Total Available Required Dead uve Snow Total Accessories 1-Trimmer-SPF 3.00" 3.00' 1.78" 2022 958 2352 5332 None 2-Trimmer-SPF 1.50" 1.50" 1.50" 1600 887 1716 4203 None Tributary Dead Floor Live Snow Loads Location(Side) Width (0.90) (1.00) (1.15) Comments 0-Self Weight(PLF) 0 to 2'10 1/2" N/A 10.4 1-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 2'10 1/2' T 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Main Level 2-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 2'10 1/2" N/A 90.0 - - Wall-Main Level 3-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 10 1/2" 8' 15.0 40.0 - Floor-Upper Level 4-Uniform(PLF) 0 to 10 1/2" N/A 80.0 - - Wall-Upper Level 5-Uniform(PSF) 0 to 10 1/2" 2' 20.0 - 35.0 Snow-Monos Linked from:1/2 6-Point(Ib) 10 1/2" N/A 2102 400 3159 Bath Window, Support 1 Linked from:1/2 7-Point(Ib) 2'10 1/2" N/A 720 360 847 Bath Window, Support 2 Weyerhaeuser Notes (Zj)SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the Sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. ��r Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software.Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for Installation details. (www.woodbywy.com)Accessories(Rim Board,Bloddng Panels and Squash Blocks)are not designed by this software.Use of this software Is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction.The designer of record,budder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project.Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards.Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports refer to http://www.woodbywy.com/ser4cEs/s_CodeReports.aspx. as Reports• px. The product application,input design bads,dimensions and support Information have been provided by Gonyea;plan dated 9/29/2016. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/20/2016 3:23:05 PM Jeffrey Doty.Design Suoervisor Gonyea Homes-GH0660 Forte v5.1, Design Engine:V6.5.1.1 Lyman Lumber Company 780 Lakeview Parkway;Orono,MN 780 Lakeview Parkway:Orono. MN.4te (952)470-4866 Evenson Residence jeff_dotyg)lymanlumber.tom 102012016;#21554 Page 32 of 32 CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN DAT j / 7 TIME / / INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED f11 PERMIT NO. -.71)/(,-; .-DI,Sc)I COMPLETED ADDRESS L. a /L U i e Pk L J OWNER TELE NO. (' - 7 V/ - 9,0&94 CONTRACTOR C-17 Q/I( 0 1---fres . DESCRIPTIONP7-07-) -7— / N C /VQ u ) . cvr W0 FOOTING 0 DEMO- FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL 3 ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING © ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP 0 AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 S ER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ElPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU* YES__._NO COMMENTS: CC CC dm tae F _ . CPe% Qv .1t . © 4 - Cx)c-,e--f--- i x i 01 ,r41 ._.)ecLt. rr;/2 giik -iwy ..,J 4 )----. `41/49cc z • F >. — c< r'1 _S W (s s'4t/dr / CC f-)k. a W 8 '• 'K SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE cCW • IP qb RRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY Lj BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT O CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. 0 PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cali for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor sit Inspector. 1?6 L- White Copyltnspector's Flle Canary Copy/Slt.Notice Pv:-.5 c.9_-,- , TE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN f INSPECTION N TICSSCHEDULED /'" ,, 6- PERMIT NO. v `" / OMPL D ADDRESS -a OWNER LEPHONE NO. ' r s CONTRACTOR (21 ` " - al. 'et--' • •DESCRIPTION 1_�u-i i11)O ' /i / ' WE0 FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC iie L. A ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/c 0ING/FILLING FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS I., ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT 4 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z „I ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:-�YES_NO Si COMMENTS: l�u�f.� �% it . 4 1 n,5 rte.• _a K j p t _ it c3ce,tce4fr-40-v tilr--er• -i t ‘ iti/rezik O ,Pet r G rls d'r e k• '45- G ! ✓-. cc Q w z vu CC W ►'. • KSATISFACTORY:PROCEED 0 PROJECT COMPLETE ttW 0 •s RRECT WORK&PROCEED 0 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY tJ BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector: J - White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 0 ) --\-- \ 1,: ii#1/ i Ct''' DA TIME\ ' CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE_ i SCHEDULED l ,e,-"`:.A PERMIT NO. Zi tp–D Ii COMPLETED ADDRESS 7 &1I L--a- i e-LO Vit. ‘-x% OWNER1TELEPHO kl NO. LO '- meq," `batt CONTRACTOR '/ 0Y\-i`Q- -- 1s, PP DESCRIPTION UULAIL4 LU CAC ( 1 W 0 FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL 4' POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING C ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:—YES___.NO • COMMENTS: aW. itbair r vitapiesot ..,- e- 6pec I it .. 14 ty eile--er,igt,- ,,,• 51,. . - Co v.,Zi of K. .5- eev-4 ,- et a w W tt WKSATISFACTORY PROCEED /'?' " • ECT COMPLETE 14 0 CORRECT WORK&PROCEED 0 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY C:5 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. CI PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnerContractor on site: Inspector: 9E1" cf<f- White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSlte Notice ronyea nomes, coy haKeview rarxway,vrono, m iv 00011 urIsign uy buliuN:apea l/1111111ILMI,t.14,1 in vraur dy At'b,Jc1111l, r dill,All, chilli 1 kale:fr=V \ \ \ _ Pay.z..c..) DEC 31. 7016 \ CITY OF ORONO 11,Revats Plan Reviw e Site P11,Rev' Date fr-c- OVED P El APPROVED WITH REVISIONS(see notes) I ril 61,Pravea seed -.----- \ 0 DENIED DOT \ , ..---------- , \ \ Sod,krdsorrue trriLs /---. 5od,lanieeepe lents i ,,*, .. ,, -.-'ur:,,/ V.' \ as ft baffler wed • 8 ft between uolls ,,t, ,MILVII, 2 ft hgh oak,rearing wall "v"" ', '-_ S ir\ 6 Mac*carpet vi-ea Icate . \ Arrtbele hydrangea Ni. 0 56,-.4 sno6 6.,f3ePPle tree ORONO COPY , 14x1Cbritk path lame rock cr 0 do:,,,,,,,b,,,,cnel,rl d isle sir,* 2 D.Lerf hintay spruce —NA lerrkuerpe inris f Int.,.eras wet,.the twee \. Ed*,wee.dr..-of lane \ r=1,dctoice Frers urn \ wee 1 . ' 3 Bbe dir.frOeF \ landscape kn., :---------------------------- \ 7 G'''''''''rrY : (ow, ortooT \---.1., .._. -- 6 Feather reed g- \ Sod,landncepe ferns \ \ .,...7.. \ \ \ • r= \-- 5od,lent:tape fent, --->----...... ..____„, \ . ,. Sod,Icreiscepe int, \ . \ \6 t kr7tatit 66.66,,,.....6i \ Seed di cfoloise deoc tolF \ Seed d dearbe deco wth PIN POT teldeveo ded ._----- \ \ \ \ \ Z.— V \ ,' '' ''' Lckeview Parkway ,,,,-,_0, • /-- -'-'-- .....,0 -• N --- 5- ...-- - ---- e--, ,.., - Lalkojely Pcr6ay \ , -- . / ,, «3* S. — ..L.7..EL.3. �,oeMn., m ,1; *.b,.de..mdOmMemorkr ,...,Mama. . -„ .k..e..rh. ,a,. •y. ,,w.. •. .x .m, /:�; �'� ., ab 2 E.on.•ux.v ter shown m m in0romwu.+l 0... / // / ' fa..m.m,tl.0 arced.Ne ear.lr.mmaranyand all ..a•/ �K/” ✓i e,An. ,gmkk tdn.n'sod.II d.q....runyu at mete he.[01090.11.re0K He mhos lobe my ! _+.� ...Ey kxeEnd w=,.•,.y w all.,,.onrnot�.. p i� / ryry ! a/ /�.nai,�� �„ 3 •mt�2,emoe v.d4*.n....Le 4 �., id —�/,�—- • 5_ . �. i�alx•evd ubav' o(.Im sal cm i / .Y: r4.ASM1v pap.to Aso.gaudy hos Eve Ertra,ty FltsdlIte beilL 4' /',..,'''' ''''.:,.,,..c.<'.;:- i !'/ ,.All Cy.1 ,ue*mon....n.rel.ene....o..rr...ru:. ���� �"r �� ��. d '1". 1 p— / e. au,i«dt..""ehereon the recorded wn.e.m.., . / //iP�Jl'l/ H/„/�K 3 rA�;\�� i I �/ , nw..eamd...—.d;•�w kola,w.neeb..w. n// / �/ /J/ 1 'r.. I .o«ere ati // y/ �d�.�/ .x, gyp .r it '�.(,.. .. vm6..�..n.,.ut rna+rr.r.......e. / 5�/ / ,/,�T 1: 1 I l / ie/ 8-j au.-.hrn 1,' --',-JI no o I "r i eii / ' �l r x. "'n''.”k' �,.. / 7.' / � 1e` \ I' '/ "� , et • ol ar d D /; ;,•y I, a re• 1 a LOT 5 ,r, / dU f ' p�1_ d// 1, :1 / / ; ;�� �[,� 1 1T 15.,,. / / .n �, 1 F ,-,i r*as I, r / • +' rt` I pe,.ltbt /3 / H.rpwvr • / �� {y.nV t{/ I' 1 1 I _ w ' � 5411 7 e„ 1 Q1 r` � •w � �b / i I I y ..,,T B tier. / j 1\. , /..� 1. /~ „Wa•... V.4 11 k ,� I xi I 1 � — ® f (7,t — I a......, •o�;,. W f� I �,. r .,f //\ ,� Y�5 ,,, /�\ / cam.m.a,.rc 0 IS 3a La l I \m 1I ... \,. •'e9/ �. -,, / ,ma 20 SCALE __ /� �� SURVEY LEGEND EV 7:::t‘ N. .: r ......s__ ...........,.%,,„.,,,,.___Itt„\\t ........,,,,..:,_,,,_:„iiii,\,i.„,,,,_\_,::.\,:::.......1.,‘..„.,..til 1..4„,„„,,,7„.::,t-sts1.,,,l'::,:t„...7::.„1_71:12.ill11;1„..,,,,,,:71".'1."1:::://::.,:1.1411./.'.::,,:';',/// / a N. n I � 213 33 R $ r / .a. _ -----,-.1,--1.---_.„..t________ LAKEVIE W PARK �� ` ®, _ WAY `\ / .n.,,,v, ... T .,r..,.. .o .. 1 w„ ...d ....r�uoro�wr..,wm...uc. ,..o,...nse n.•.,evwr.n,........wy,..xrm m..,.......do....dw,w„w / x /...:r.'. .. .�,��.. w.� ss/a ..roo,o.,....c...alnoo. w..e.rck.r.ea.r,e.,ou..mm,® ,kn.e.,r..... �.. "• FILE NO. «r.� a" . ,..."" b��""'"'`o` n "" �� SAT ...1•000•..y�`� CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY „m:x (p23` HRE-BERGQUIST,INC. TI R r. .. w�u.. . . .tee ,..� ew..mrrcmun.rv..,....m,w.,.<., —�,w,.. -'^"T �msau .v,.Moro ew.m,.i PREPARED FOR: .u..wo,nre..m s..,.,y..r.cam,.�a•rwE.. _ au1.>e,noo MO Me..;, e,y.,.,.,,�..a.r.. .ww..,.aw. GONYEA HOMES 00010 1 ''...;,,,,," ;',.=:,..........,. .rx� ... �. , _ ,.,w 1 DATE TIME 1 CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN /'f INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED 1 1 PERMIT NO. 1e)th- o/c.-e7 COMPLETED ! ADDRESS 1 '( (`C /'..0 _ (�-'l L. illi:j11:- Ct7:1 /4.211-1 OWNER TELEPffONO. '' f , /C% 4 , CONTRACTOR 6:-/C.)jam7`-f' 7S / (..g `` DESCRIPTION f (.--1Y4-7-2/ W 0 FOOTING 0 DEMO- FINAL 0 SEPTIC FIt1AL ▪ ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q 0 FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL i• pirADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION '4C 0 FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT 4 ❑ FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP ❑ AS BUILT- SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL • ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL 5▪ OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES____NO • COMMENTS: tt 4,1 a. bra r p©� o roCtc 4 Q k.� CS 6ea� 5 !a , ,e6Q .� 74-...a4=Y- 0 CC ,p e 4 e6r-rr�ra,'n , -` p (! 4. W CC e___ _____ ____,6 41 0......Z w Z W CC2yi/YORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED I I PROJECT COMPLETE ❑ CORRECT WORK&PROCEED H ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 4.4 O ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY () BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. C l PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN 17 CITATION ISSUED ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnerlContractor on site: inspector. l h't' White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 5e.)._ DATE TIM' CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN -3--/----) 7 INSPECTION N I E /SCHEDULED , -..- -2.,,----/ 7 /O 'i PERMIT NO. 1 "� CO L ' � �ETE �1 cp a l ' Y ADDRESSI f OWNER TELEPHONE NO.&/Z`" 7 '- lob 9 CONTRACTOR ,-Yl. / ( 64A_ Q 1 DESCRIPTION 1'`/:C IQ ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO- FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL C'Q ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS 1, ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT -4 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP tij ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:`YES_____NO 97 kreii Gt,�1,91'^011 . /-'o2,1%r/`7 W 4 f r.---7:4,--1-‘ k_ • - 1 ,,,,,„_, _s 4, .c_z__<_.."- / L- 1 cr..„„.....,„ 6,---k- cc 0 4. W / -- FLS{. --_i c , / .,� / ILA c / 1/Q / '.247 IA' (i 1 ''''''l Cre 0 /w ‘ UJ " • ',A-5/ -�' ('r C.,'‘-- ( t i G f J a W a ' •RK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE CCW El *4)RRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CO 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. [I PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN 0 CITATION ISSUED ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor onsir: Inspector. t White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 1 1/ to/P. 6 j i Y DATE // / %TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN __. INP INSPECTION NOTICE c - f SCHEDULED _..:401.;i PERMIT NO. (;'L (4- COMPLETED y� ADDRESS1'7 C2 C A�.r I I f - ' ,,.' it cc (./ OWNER TELEPHONE N9. 9 Vs 1 CONTRACTOR C r%�'t-y, L.—/-t—of 6 `t t'4 aDESCRIPTION j-,-1'2 5 c ( Glu ?.717 I IQ ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO- FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING O ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF El PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION /t 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS i,,,„INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP ID FOLLOW-UP Z ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL ❑ DEMO- SITE ❑ TIC INSTALL ' OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET, YES—NO COMMENTS: - 1-1/€44 — •64144 i-tf eL. i9/ 1/, • cc IQ f frus - e-,‘3 alt V9,12,... G 4. Art. 0 ac .lcfi Pt-5 /rte £� 'L► Q'r�..s• e ' / V). r---[Q...1 WW06>~ �� d I., k 0 A. -- a. L.- . QP-S [94z>,6-F-fuer Q ei 6 .0 .r j..C�.t-W Q t 4,.L. , d1&- k $4-14.PGot,vj61r3 /O , tu Lu jGe..," #1'v c C `6--f--- r..)K mer-- Gras e✓- Lu ❑ WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE QCtufr> RRECT WORK&PROCEED 0 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY ti BEFORE COWERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. LI PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnedContractor on site:, Inspector. /i -' a�J White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice 1 4_0 .„,,,,,re_____.,/ DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE ,i r.,, SCHEDULED 2'/ '. 30 PERMIT NO. i'.;ICI('2 COMPLETED •r < r (----kt• v ADDRESS ( )j _{ } t lc-A_ c'1 OWNERpertTELEP O ENO. ((( -- / CONTRACTOR i - 0/1 k c,--4 E DESCRIPTION I'�- Li, 0 FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL � ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING ElFOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL La— ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS Z ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 PTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES NO cl COMMENTS: ct Lu I 4( es Pt 2c-,,# . af f�.o e 1— ediceroof1, CC o a. CC 1 C.40 1 r e52-40,544-- e.cc ..s-j i5 co/vfa yr .. W cc Q i e",/,.( --6`— Gr'im'e Lij W CC aXVMeRK SATISFACTORY`.PROCEED D PROJECT COMPLETE 0 CORRECT WORK&PROCEED 0 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY C BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT O CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN D CITATION ISSUED O STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR O INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnedContractor on site: Inspector: 9-/iv, 'Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice CITY OF ORONO 3 CALLED IN DA TIME INSPECTION NOTT; , SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. IP ``e-Y&Y J COMPLETE ADDRESS /8O itIk0 or&w fi2r4 DVCy OWNER _ TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION LN 0 FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL AuPOURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING C ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL ❑ RADON SLAB 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL v 0 DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNBVCOMTRACT�OR TO MEET YOU: YES—NO COMMENT& km CC rt. et/gd OC 64L1 Q 9j%1(/Y� jL cc ( t41 3e 3 W 0 WORK SATISFACTORY.PROCEED ECT COMPLETE w • ❑ CORRECT VMORK&PROCEED ❑ I E CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHI N HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cal for the next Inspection u hours In advance. (952) 249-4600 on site: CopyfInspectoes Flo Canary CapyiSIN Notice \(\ / DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN r INSPECTION OT�'ICE 15 1 SCHEDULED CC I7 I I c& PERMIT NO.E ca G COMPLETED ADDRESS ►I /v La Q vi victu 49E- - `� OWNER TELEPHONE NO. bh-" / C CONTRACTOR a__ ihAr &S DESCRIPTION Ly . /� ( A1kY1Cj W0 FOOTING 0 DEMO-FIW. 0 SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING C• ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION ' 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W Ict ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL LS Z OMIN TO MEET YOU:_YES-_NO 2 COMMENTS: E fee- P',./ay - b - / 33 !/27 cc 141 ,. 64&vei' / 4 — b K ` "4. Ere 7 67,,,,Lc s o _ emf✓ rj40/4, r�•ft. -ode , >. s :a. _D . G�GVedaro ,'-' o 4 - , e wGr/a b cc W O Prole G SoI�G� c.o.d.- cz,t ACC66.14 54e/0e_y et Q flit d4" 06 f K Camp le.e+_ ,r- c Duel. e. ez Pr A6 ' Code IQ cr a 0 W D WORK SATISFACTORY.PROCEED 0 PROJECT COMPLETE LU W 0 CORRECT WORK&PROCEED 0 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O 0 CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. 0 PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN 0 STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR 0 CITATION ISSUED 4NSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. 'r5,4-p64". CaN for the next Inspection 24 hours In advance. (952) 249-4600 OwneriContractor on site: Inspector: White CopyAnspactor'a Me Canary Capy/SIb Nodes RUN DATE:09/20/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 06-117-23 31 0016 38 06-117-23 42 0006 38 06-117-23 43 0021 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS C T EVENSON&A M EVENSON 575 NORTH ARM DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC VICTORIA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS CHRISTOPHER T EVENSON 18215 45TH AVE N STE D C/O THOMAS MAZER AMY M EVENSON PLYMOUTH MN 55446 560 NORTH ARM DR 780 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 32 0017 38 06-117-23 43 0001 38 06-117-23 43 0022 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC S BAKLUND&M BAKLUND SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 650 NORTH ARM DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC STEVEN BAKLUND SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 18215 45TH AVE N STE D MELISSA BAKLUND 18215 45TH AVE N STE D PLYMOUTH MN 55446 650 NORTH ARM DR PLYMOUTH MN 55446 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-2334 0009 38 06-117-23 43 0002 38 07-117-23 12 0009 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC S J GIRARD&B R GIRARD J R FELDMANN&D L FELDMANN 735 LAKEVIEW PKWY 680 NORTH ARM DR 805 FOREST ARMS LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC SANDRA J GIRARD JOSEPH R FELDMANN 18215 45TH AVE N STE D BRIAN R GIRARD DONELLE L FELDMANN PLYMOUTH MN 55446 680 NORTH ARM DR 805 FOREST ARMS LA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 34 0010 38 06-117-23 43 0012 KIRBY SNEEN&TAMARA SNEEN KH&B M SHIN 765 LAKEVIEW PKWY 645 NORTH ARM DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 KIRBY CONRAD SNEEN KWANG H SHIN TAMARA HANSON SNEEN 645 NORTH ARM DR 765 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 34 0011 38 06-117-23 43 0013 J S MAJKRZAK&L J MAJKRZAK SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 770 LAKEVIEW PKWY 775 LAKEVIEW PKWY ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JEFFREY S MAJKRZAK SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC LIZA J MAJKRZAK 18215 45TH AVE N STE D 770 LAKEVIEW PKWY PLYMOUTH MN 55446 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 34 0012 38 06-117-23 43 0014 J S MAJKRZAK&L J MAJKRZAK C KONING&P A KONING 750 LAKEVIEW PKWY 795 LAKEVIEW PKWY ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JEFFERY S MAJKRZAK CHRISTOPHER KONING LIZA J MAJKRZAK PATRICIA A KONING 750 LAKEVIEW PKWY 795 LAKEVIEW PKWY MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 06-117-23 34 0013 38 06-117-23 43 0015 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC K DE CLERCQ&A CAUWELS 730 LAKEVIEW PKWY 4315 LAKEVIEW CT ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC KARLIEN DE CLERCQ 18215 45TH AVE N STE D ALEXANDER CAUWELS PLYMOUTH MN 55446 6811 LILY LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 06-117-23 34 0016 38 06-117-23 43 0018 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC DINGMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4340 LAKEVIEW CT ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC DINGMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 18215 45TH AVE N STE D 9010 90TH LANE PLYMOUTH MN 55446 GREENFIELD MN 55373 38 06-117-23 34 0017 38 06-117-23 43 0019 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC J BURRIS&S BURRIS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4350 LAKEVIEW CT ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC JOSHUA BURRIS 18215 45TH AVE N STE D STEPHANIE BURRIS PLYMOUTH MN 55446 4350 LAKEVIEW CT ORONO MN 55364 38 06-117-23 42 0005 38 06-117-23 43 0020 B V JOHNSON&P R JOHNSON SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 580 NORTH ARM DR 800 LAKEVIEW PKWY ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BRYCE V&PAULA R JOHNSON SOURCE LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 580 NORTH ARM DR 18215 45TH AVE N STE D MOUND MN 55364 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 9/20/2019 pY 3r T6-7� '3t F,,,.Nil. - —' * t s �.4 ms } y s' `' y.-'::::;.--.,.*-.,..:'.!--:-.:;--.::;1.----.:, ` t'fi �..F tip.., ,y.. , " €'. sy 'ate*x ^ tom' y zt'' t d } 'ace F a :. jp ""tt`3, t .- "c 5 is C1 - Y ys F • N 4,...,481- ,47� k r .� �.t 3 @ €} A: 41 ..0 � K*` 111 '''''. '' ,.'I''''' .._A ... �. i,. 645 Of3 r , n,... t.„) 770 750 �yy�y Wi1ti1 . 80 0 L PI - }N.... .€.P .„, _. 4340 Niiiiiiiiit A . w,�, 4010 VIII WaR 765 N. 80 l 775 CR? 795 4111 4 ‘At ortlie 44:15 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I iii l i l i l 780 Lakeview Parkway This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to competeness or accuracy; (i)is furndhedwith no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennep n County shat not be liablefor anydamage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,M N 55487 rgisinfo@hennepin.us November 11, 2019 Chair Orono City Planning Commission 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55323 RE: Public Notice LA19-000085 Evenson request for amendment to Lakeview of Orono Conservation Easement Dear Members of the Orono Planning Commission, Along with our North Arm neighbors and many other Orono residents we watched in horror as Chris and Amy Evenson lost their home,their landscaping, and their beloved dog to a terrible fire on July 13, 2018. After an outpouring of sympathy and support we are all delighted that the Evensons have decided to rebuild and remain a part of the Lakeview community. We have lived at 580 North Arm Drive for 33 years. Our property is across the road from the Lakeview Development and the Evenson property. We are also founding members of the non-profit entity that owns a conservation easement establishing Lakeview Legacy Park,which is north of the Evensons and has a clear view of their house and backyard area. We are unable to attend the Commission meeting on November 18th and are therefore providing these written comments. Since the written description of this request and the proposed ordinance language was not available prior to the requested deadline for written comments from the public,we can only express our opinion after a telephone inquiry with City Staff and a conversation with the Evensons themselves. Based on the information orally available to us, it appears that this was a tragic sequence of unintended events in which the Evensons landscaped their property without knowledge or intent of encroaching upon their conservation easement and without guidance or objection from the City. Absent the tragedy of the fire, it seems unlikely that this issue would have ever arisen. We as neighbors and as one of the benefactors of Lakeview Park do not object to the Evensons request. We believe that it is only fair to allow them to recreate what was already defacto approved by the City and do not believe that this small change in the easement would have any adverse effect on the function or intent of their conservation easement or on the nearby park. In addition, it is our understanding that the Evensons have also added a native planting area on the non-easement portion of their property that could be viewed as offsetting part of the disputed conservation easement area. We believe that in this case common sense and a recognition on the part of the City that they are also responsible for the error that occurred should allow this family to keep their landscaping as rebuilt and redraw their conservation easement to reflect that. This is truly an unusual situation and should not in any way threaten the amount or intent of the remaining Lakeview development conservation easements,for which we are very supportive and appreciative. Sincerely, Bryce and Paula Johnson Evenson, Chris {PBC} From: Jeffrey S Majkrzak <jsmajkrzak@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 18,2019 3:00 PM To: jonRessler@outlook.com Cc: Evenson,Chris{PBC} Subject: Public Notice LA19-00085 - Evenson Conservation Easement Request Dear Members of the Orono Planning Commission, I am writing this email in support of the request made by Amy and Chris Evenson to amend the conservation area adjacent to their property. My wife and I live next door to the Evenson's at 770 Lakeview Parkway. We witnessed first hand their devastating loss of their home and family pet a year ago this past July. I can't imagine what they have had to go through and know we will never forget that dayl They are such great people and we were thrilled when they decided to re-build and stay in our neighborhood. Ultimately building their new home slightly larger with many upgrades both inside and out. Everyone in the neighborhood was happy for them to be able to put their devastating loss behind them and move forward. The issue that is before the Planning Commission is confusing to me. We witnessed first hand their building process since our properties were under construction at the same time.The rear fence along their property line appears unchanged from their initial build.So I am confused as to how this was missed with their initial"as built"survey. Regardless,this family has been through enough and are now caught up in an administrative mess that doesn't seem fair. They have re-built a beautiful home and have offered up a reasonable solution. We respectfully request that approval be granted. Best regards, Liza and Jeff Majkrzak 770 Lakeview Parkway Orono, MN. Sent from my iPad 1 Date Application Received:09/21/19 Date Application Considered as Complete:9/25/19YJD . 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 01/23/20 y To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members 11104., Dustin Rief, City Administrator 4kEsHO‘1"ti From: Melanie Curtis, Planner I'Y1GG Date: 18 November 2019 Subject: #LA19-000086,J. Marie Fieger, 580& 590 Big Island Permit for Dock on City ROW Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a permit to install a dock on City right-of- way to access their non-lakeshore, interior property on Big Island. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant owns 580 and 590 Big Island,two non-lakeshore properties on Mahpiyata Island, the western portion of Big Island. The applicant's properties are adjacent to the platted 30-foot wide right-of-way between 570& 600 Big Island. The applicant is requesting approval to install a seasonal dock on this right-of-way, pursuant to City Code Section 78-657.This code provision provides a mechanism for an off-lake property owner to request a permit to install or construct private improvements on public rights-of-way. The dock allows access to their property. There are no roads on big island. This provision only exists within the RS District (Big Island and Deering Island), however not on the mainland. Applicable Regulations: Permit for Private Improvements within Public Rights-of-Way (Section 78-567) This section states that"it is unlawful for any person to alter, improve or use for private purposes in any RS district any platted public right-of-way... without first obtaining a permit from the council, as follows"(The following section has been abbreviated for analysis,the entire section is attached as Exhibit E): 1. Inland property access, persons desiring access to property located inland and not abutting the shoreline may apply for a permit to privately use and/or improve platted public right-of-way for such purpose.The permit applicant shall demonstrate and the council shall find: • That there is no reasonable alternative access available. The applicant's property does not abut the lake or a public dock access. • That the proposed improvements and/or type of use would not unreasonably affect other properties abutting the right-of-way. The installation of a seasonal dock on the right-of-way as proposed should not adversely impact the other properties on this side of the island as all but the applicant's properties are lakeshore properties. FILE#LA19-000086 18 Nov 19 Page 2 of 3 • The council may approve, deny or place restrictions on any such permit based upon public health, safety and welfare considerations, including without limitation the configuration of adjoining record lots,the location,width,topography, drainage and vegetation on the right-of-way and the number of existing or future property owners who may require access at the same location. Any land alterations or improvements approved shall be the minimum amount necessary to provide reasonable inland access. 2. Land alterations. Grading or physical alteration of any platted public right-of-way for any purpose, including inland property access, is prohibited except when such work has been specifically authorized as part of a permit issued by the council... 3. Dockage on right-of-way. Installing, maintaining, keeping or using a private dock on any platted public right-of-wayfor any purpose,including inland property access,is prohibited except when such dock has been specifically authorized as part of a permit issued by the council... The council may establish reasonable standards or requirements in approving any such dock permit. 4. Encroachments prohibited. No private property, buildings, structures, fences, boats, vehicles,dock parts,junk or debris shall be built,stored, parked or kept at any time within any platted public right-of-way, within any platted public park, or on any other property owned by the city except as specifically authorized by a permit issued under this section. 5. Permit exceptions. No permit shall be required for any person to walk on or over any platted public right-of-way or any platted public park when such use is made without altering the natural state of the land... 6. Public use limited. Any permit issued under this section shall be deemed to open the platted public right-of-way only to the extent necessary as established in the permit, and for the limited use of the permittee and his invitees. 7. Permit limitations. A permit issued under this section shall not grant or vest any property rights to use of the public right-of-way or other public property, or in any improvements. Permits issued under this section shall be valid for one year, shall be subject to change, alteration or revocation for cause by the council at any time, and shall be automatically renewable on the anniversary of the date of issuance except upon written notice from the city to the permittee at least 30 days prior to the anniversary date. 8. Hold harmless... As a condition of issuance of any permit, the applicant shall in writing release, indemnify and hold harmless the city from any and all claims or causes of action arising out of the use or alteration of the platted right-of-way by applicant or his invitees. 9. Permit hearing and notice. The planning commission or the council shall hold a public hearing or hearings on each application for a permit... Analysis Staff finds the request meets the criteria outlined in Section 78-567 for approval. Up until this time, staff understands that the applicant has been informally sharing a dock with neighboring lakeshore property owners. This arrangement cannot be legally formalized as Orono City Code prohibits establishment or creation of an easement which grants access to the lake to any person for any uses, including but not limited to docking, mooring, swimming and launching of boats (Code Section 82-225). FILE#LA19-000086 18 Nov 19 Page 3 of 3 Engineer Comments The City's Public Works Director, Adam Edwards notes that the right-of-way in question leads to Pleasant View Park. Should a dock be installed as proposed, the city should request the right to use the dock for the purposes of accessing the site for any required maintenance or inspections. This was discussed with the applicant and she has agreed to this condition. Public Comments Comments from the public have been received; comments are attached as Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested permit? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the permit. Further, staff recommends the Planning Commission consider applying the following conditions: 1. The location of the installed dock shall meet the LMCD's requirements, and shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 2. The dock shall be removed for the winter season. 3. The permit issued shall be valid for one year, and shall be subject to change, alteration or revocation for cause by the council at any time, and shall be automatically renewable on the anniversary of the date of issuance except upon written notice from the city to the permittee at least 30 days prior to the anniversary date. 4. The dock shall be permitted one boat slip for use by the owner of 580 & 590 Big Island exclusively. 5. Dock sections shall not exceed 6-feet in width. 6. No canopy shall be erected. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Site Plan Exhibit D. Map/Aerial Photo Exhibit E. City Code Sections Exhibit F. Public Comment Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 09/21/2019 Address: 580 BIG EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 Parcel Number: 2211723310031 Land Use Number: LA19-000086 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: JANET MARIE FIEGER Address: 275 S SUTTON LAKE BLVD JORDAN, MN 55352 Applicant: Name: Janet Marie Fieger Company: Address: 275 S. Sutton Lake Blvd. Jordan, MN 55352 jmarie@nemerfieger.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Install dock on City ROW for access to interior island property on Big Island Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision - Concept Application ', 1 Conditional Use Permit i Site Plan Application Subdivision Application --i Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application 1 Applicant Signature: /dr September 25, 2019 History of access to my landlocked cabin on Big Island and request for permanent access My parents purchased the three lots with a cabin on plots 580/590 Big Island in 1974. At that time,the dock that was included with the sale was on the Right Of Way, and they were told that their access was up the right of way between the two cabins. The neighbor,Selden Robb, requested that my parents agree to create a shared dock on his property to allow for a larger span of beach. My parents agreed and since 1974,we have shared installation, purchase of parts/materials and the removal of the shared dock each fall, as well as a path to and from the cabin across the Robb property. Our families have remained friends and continue this unwritten agreement through today. I purchased the cabin from my father in 2014 and am now putting it up for sale. I'd like to request that the future buyer of my cabin,which is three landlocked lots accessible only by the public right of way, be allowed to install a dock on the public right away in perpetuity. I have attempted to purchase a ten-foot strip of land from the beach to my property from the Robb family, but to date,they are not interested in this potential solution. Thank you for your consideration and ability to access plots 580+590 on which sits my cabin. Sincerely, J. Marie Fieger jmarie@nemerfieger.com , cell: 612-940-1668 home: 275 S. Sutton Lake Blvd.,Jordan, MN 55352 Recreation Point - • . Gery&Andrea Scane I t , Lydia&Brian Botham Gerald Erickson I '1/4Dee Kordek 700 720 .,1\64.....s Janie Hill Q688'" William Bryson „-'moi Cinda Collins 590 James Fieger,J.Mari; 'eger Lydia&Brian Botham 650 James Fieger Jeff Person 40 580 �� 630 Christian Famliy Ch ch Janie : . -. .' 620 610 570 560 a 1 ) Tom&Vena Lapp' g \\.Z1 Donna Adams 64 i To 'obb cho Bay Big Island Inc R.F. Faus Gabriel Jabbour` fl J�`� 550 540 >1.--' i Sk ' r, 0-- ( I 9S0 9 i --i, ;-� 433 i. � \i \ m (---• r-� C N r Ieij I X11 I r p � '� 1 1 C --0 ' ---; 1,_ �'3 I 9516 J`› 2¢3 4. I ( f) 0,... 952' 4 J;o _r I Y> 951 -951 ��y .A�(,i7'II y. �--^ - --t "1• 00 `L D 1'1 I ---1 6�O t71 In �T, e 1 o in 0 i 1 1 rD o I. It. T 34 ITT 1 ic '' t\ l i I 9Ss� O � I It t, D' r.,'I \ 1 SO r ,, °7 m . 1`q r 00', y 'Sn 1 54.0'S AT 7$O Q\ W 9qq N5490MEAS r _S 76°30'ppt, S 84696O . j °N S• :E946•g V �- 1 pry 3j y 94 TREE t r - U?DRaINp G`� `, i' �1.00,�.- 7 / g4gx / _ �` UTY EA� Np S { , $76°3 9r a 953X$ I� II mmEN c r A 116,�pp E lb - (Ti ' "`•4 2 •1 il 5I o-vY ..,-" ,m P ul �i o lam fu z g`� n N782941"W 7y� t r. r (,) .7.88` % c �o I ' o s-- ri • � 03, ,,' Y r v i- 2 t I o C7f •42.6 u) 1 Cl• r-` . 0 ......,, • A 'W � .# `3mZ f--T � „,1� 11,76� o I i�N » r m �- r{ J � nw _ P � n.o14 PJ, I OK r„ I '�mE [n"N+ A ' z mkg • 01 rnM •o �' 15.34 .A , NA7z5 6.'3,-• -m �i o ^'ori W o �� 1 �� m W cool '4 DECK ' w N w1 -_ '0 13' rl 93 $.m r. 0 930 l . I ' m , 4T-" J•P Z (J1 n 'I'VE Lk -_,....2.' �_ >�J I 1 �T l II 1 t 1 , =___„,.._ NG 000� y o 1---,der'''''.-^'W,orNW , n , a m m m 93 ' --- '1. 01 rn Xx r • 3 I • /931.. / I 1 11 (` I v� \r� I .-- - i\_I _ mm , I y If, 1931 6 '4'1"-1 , i �` '• , 1 � 84-- + 3p.00. 4 I =gyp,' -I ',sj7e-gN=«— --- 146.16-1L> ; • �5 82` 86°19'39"E — • — c r • y Si:-1; '� UNE 1 929 4 -.SURVEY LINE •i ' t6 ' 929 4 r. --_-_,•,.., 937 3 ,t 92' �.". SHORELINE SE MBC-R 7gYg 96 '..--;:"6"-------__,_,-f,"'-� �-- -`'rte �- 11 II LA /cF 0' MINNETONKA a l-....y f r j • i ,. i i 1 • r } - • . ,E r" f t ' A 2 a 7-411 • s , . . -'gym=,- .c ,�,.a""` a :!`� meet • . . ... y i,4;;;;,:.;:::i:::;:;:i-,..:::'',.:-.:':...71;.:;;,;;;.'.,.-:..:-:,:1,,',...7,:'::', ,,,, :-..:,..-:,-,;7,11.fri:::%,:l''':;:.,7':iii,j:,,k..::-'1.1,t,...,.,7';t:2:,',.:..-'1."'.'ZI6H7'...3.3.'''''::::''':''IcH;14.:,.,.„:: ;.,,.,,,, ..:::;:::::4:'-'4,;;;:',,,,e';.:4-,...-.1.,..:-..1'1.„-;'.4,,H1,..,3'e.,::44 -t* E y !. ".- .; ate;;; x -',"...7/ - ..el-a, _ 'ib� 1, .: ,;:.' mar Y; t '''''. •'404i.' 1.1X.,,44:1;, 't....i.r,; ..tV't:$.,;.'..''' -2,,,,,,-,A,,,,,-.4,„.4,,,,,...,.-1,,4,;',,,,,(ATA,,,,..*„' -,'„i.,,,,,,:',5.‘.. i ,-,t,...,_,:__,,..,,, ..,„,§ t. 0 f ,7 y:mt < t a S -, • 5 a �',1 ii++ 7yn�.,;,.f t lift .i f: iiit 'r' J tia. %,4, `{ ,.:-..A..,':, r�4 . , 4t, _{ at y'fr''L'+"44� •OM1 1 5� _t*�,� aC.• -,...71:: '7, Nr:Nw ''a inn y,..,.„..... $ 4,1"--,,,--..,."'''q K. r • ,t.• .ia 4R' I a -4-2‘4,:,14,701,1• e t M'j••?.a t'• h. 41:rys " fi*j ' c, ., ,a . '14;'''''-': y.t :l [e ! S 4,t' 4.F - ''`-'4.., * yet, •----,.."-,--A‹-.'77;. ''''',11.r!"". . :' '.""`',,,*•' .•.' ." .t• 'C-t: ' ''''',.7 t.,"4it','"N,''''• •".4'''X."'";te. '-':tr'_,-xt :jt.,"'',' ..., ,„ ',ft'. ,:ttg, t',,;S"."4.J1 '"'' 4 ' 'J1.... '' .10 -11.tflA,-,,:::.i*i..k:'AR.t "" ' ''''%,'"'"'"'':':*.'': ''' ',�1 t . Alli'y 4 .+s'+, *.7• X2'%1-tai u �W�°#j, �• e , F,:--<+ c �'! h 5C; �Cy d r.{,y�r ':'",:‘,VO`3;. S • ..,:, . ... .;... ,„:.,‘,'...77: ,,:1`.11,,i - -..--,7,h.. N-1,'"'e' .,-44*,,,,,-' - . To, moi$ '.•eAF,. t ' Y k-' i ' yet < 7 +" tt of r fC°i' c ^. K '3 •�. Nirz 2� •.'S,�y •� V,.`,y, ^Y 9, ,y. .., .W'S.L.t .yE i` "... 4 d:' 'r•' "V,7.4.14` lo! =‘,N, , a r1+e�,,i . ,'. ,, ef::.. .,....'urn „''}Lr -frig '7',. "'1tKK • YY4 n•}- a rs '1'* „ {'fit" _ n ,�`'; e''i <- i ,9 1 )s-s.',•'''. Y '3�: ' *w • - : 4,17 A tee; i'''''4''';' ,''4,4 2:..!. -',Ap,i'''''''.-4,#:" - ' ' ..ft?I'''''r:-. ---,., '.*'. �..'laka . I ' + i .r Itr.-..fretiittoss.s '4 a4sr. 7 4.,..,,,,,, -s , -4.^ '''.r 't,,:k'..' — .- • ' "A'-, - ' y 0 , ......,..,4k,,,,,7-,-7: -...'. ' : r a 3 di � .e' ' M tdts- ., ..:**‘1...,.:,*4 , x-- 4i : ,..-a. 'i`FE- `-- -ti x rj 4 a*r ", ri �;�" � '� . far � � � '' �a tea• .° d.'„: r .,.-.-;,;0-,,:-.-.,-,- S < rxs rr ` > t - -.,.� r, •,..�'!" `^ . r h rot Ei ;.Z>. int .. r . .. -311:„... --:.,-.-:,-,,,,-.1',..,--,.--. w - r� a,^s 9 e,,.e,-‘14;t77;'-'17'4-4';!..-4:.:'-1‘.444-'%',46...0.4 �' .x^1.4' �� w l i}•3�,j" . � _ .....:,,':-,°`_.'=:',* t�'p_` a r •!. tom.{, t� .. ,,,i- f ,- . ',i-:'.::-.,,LC:;;;A:y. :V'4,.: ' .// p 1r ,,:?•,-.,. .....,, h -t� rM � # .ge .. r , : �_ z. � om . .: r fi` "a ,�'�-`4` �• t�. y« 3. i� '-.1?' t t q ��ttt �{- 7 i �*t��.k ^.t _ C 4C Oil ` 7. I'll ` ..y :,ij:k ..f to 1 ..r� l ' ZZ'';--:=',3:4i;:4_.:::;:;1,; •'IV'S,� i i i, ::-.,..,,:::4.,. ..,:!f..,--:.:7*. ;j;, •. ��g++g 'e a�a t �.G �i J r '''::k , A.";.;---,',P ---7:W.''\ 4 .- }•.4' p +, T , � � ' orf .} .f''f "nr Y --,- ,i � 4 $1 }n•`i' ti f , ,.-(:_.4.',.,,, 4..\0e. �t l'i. lw j s" . p»eds> osn. Sec. 82-255. - Lakeshore lots. The granting of easements which purport to grant access to the lake to any person for any uses, including but not limited to docking, mooring, swimming and launching of boats, is prohibited and shall be deemed a violation of this chapter and subject to all of the penalties and proceedings as set forth in this chapter. (Code 1984, § 11.31(4)) Sec. 78-567. - Permit for private improvements within public rights-of-way. It is unlawful for any person to alter, improve or use for private purposes in any RS district any platted public right-of-way, any platted public park, or any other property owned by the city without first obtaining a permit from the council, as follows: (1) Inland property access. Persons desiring access to property located inland and not abutting the shoreline may apply for a permit to privately use and/or improve platted public right-of-way for such purpose. The permit applicant shall demonstrate and the council shall find that there is no reasonable alternative access available, and that the proposed improvements and/or type of use would not unreasonably affect other properties abutting the right-of-way. The council may approve, deny or place restrictions on any such permit based upon public health, safety and welfare considerations, including without limitation the configuration of adjoining record lots, the location, width, topography, drainage and vegetation on the right-of-way and the number of existing or future property owners who may require access at the same location. Any land alterations or improvements approved shall be the minimum amount necessary to provide reasonable inland access. (2) Land alterations. Grading or physical alteration of any platted public right-of-way for any purpose, including inland property access, is prohibited except when such work has been specifically authorized as part of a permit issued by the council. The permit applicant shall provide a detailed land survey of the right-of-way and appropriate engineering drawings sufficient to identify the full extent of all proposed work. Permit approval shall be subject to obtaining a grading permit from city staff; and land alterations involving filling and grading shall be performed with only clean fill, and all other permits as may be required by other agencies having jurisdiction. Public rights-of-way so improved shall be maintained by the licensee. (3) Dockage on right-of-way. Installing, maintaining, keeping or using a private dock on any platted public right-of-way for any purpose, including inland property access, is prohibited except when such dock has been specifically authorized as part of a permit issued by the council. Not more than one seasonal dock will be approved for access to any one property. In review and approval or denial of such permit, the council shall consider the width and topography of the right-of-way, the number of property owners requesting dockage at that location, the plan of the proposed dock, and conformance with city and Lake Minnetonka Conservation District dock regulations. The council may establish reasonable standards or requirements in approving any such dock permit. (4) Encroachments prohibited. No private property, buildings, structures, fences, boats, vehicles, dock parts, junk or debris shall be built, stored, parked or kept at any time within any platted public right-of-way, within any platted public park, or on any other property owned by the city except as specifically authorized by a permit issued under this section. (5) Permit exceptions. No permit shall be required for any person to walk on or over any platted public right-of-way or any platted public park when such use is made without altering the natural state of the land. No permit shall be required for any person whose property abuts a platted public right-of-way or a platted public park to control weeds or brush, seed, sod, mow or otherwise maintain the right-of-way or park in a neat and presentable manner. Persons whose record lot established by section 78-568 consists of tax parcels divided by platted, unopened public right-of-way may incorporate and use such right-of-way as part of their yard without a permit, provided no permanent structures are erected or maintained within the right-of-way. (6) Public use limited. Any permit issued under this section shall be deemed to open the platted public right-of-way only to the extent necessary as established in the permit, and for the limited use of the permittee and his invitees. (7) Permit limitations. A permit issued under this section shall not grant or vest any property rights to use of the public right-of-way or other public property, or in any improvements. Permits issued under this section shall be valid for one year, shall be subject to change, alteration or revocation for cause by the council at any time, and shall be automatically renewable on the anniversary of the date of issuance except upon written notice from the city to the permittee at least 30 days prior to the anniversary date. (8) Hold harmless. As a condition of issuance of any permit, the applicant shall in writing release, indemnify and hold harmless the city from any and all claims or causes of action arising out of the use or alteration of the platted right-of-way by applicant or his invitees. (9) Permit hearing and notice. The planning commission or the council shall hold a public hearing or hearings on each application for a permit as required by section 78-48. (Code 1984, § 10.31(5); Ord.No. 210 3rd series, § 12, 6-25-2018) From: whaleblazers. To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Mom; Brett;lay;tialLQ Subject: Re: RN:LA19-000086/dock request for 580 Big Island Date: Thursday,November 14,2019 10:26:25 PM To Whom it May Concern: My name is Eric Adams and I am writing on behalf of my family, which has owned the property at 600 Big Island since 1977. We are writing to oppose the permit application for the city of Orono to grant a private dock on the public right-of-way between 600 and 570 Big Island. It is important to note that having a clear right-of-way serves an important access point for the public, all property owners on Big Island as well as emergency, utility and construction crews. Setting up a private dock would infringe upon the rights of all of the above parties. We are also writing with an alternative solution to provide lake access for the property owners of 580 Big Island. We oppose granting the permit for the following reasons: • The right-of-way provides critical access to the point of entry for power lines which serve all the residents of Big Island. By building a private dock, utility crews would lose their public access to work on the lines especially when repairs are needed due to branches falling on power lines after storms. • The right-of-way is used byproperty owners to bring construction vehicles to the island by barge. Having a dock on the right-of-way would prevent the ability of a barge to land on the beach and deliver construction equipment. • Having a dock would also prevent a barge from bringing emergency vehiclesand firefighters in the event of a fire on the island, which has happened in the past. • The right-of-way sits in a primary drainage area of Big Island. Construction of a dock will disrupt the flow of water from the island into the lake and disturb the sensitive wetland ecosystem nearby. • A private dock will impact vegetation around the drainage, which will increase erosion and impact water quality as runoff drains into the lake. • Allowing a private dock would block the public from being able to land their watercraft and access Pleasant View Park on Big Island. Living on the island creates a unique living environment, one that our family has cherished for over 40 years. However, the uniqueness of the island also forces the necessity to create modifications to regulations when necessary. An example of this is a shared septic system our property has with the property for sale, or the well system we share with our neighbor. Not ideal circumstances, but we worked together as neighbors to come up with the best possible solution for all parties. Our island community works very hard to maintain cordiality and work cohesively to support each other. It is important for the City of Orono to consider the uniqueness of property owners on Big Island to ensure we can continue to foster our small community in a highly interrelated system. When the current question about lake access arose,the property owners of 600, 570 and 580 Big Island came together to explore the best possible solution for all parties. For over 40 years the Fieger property has utilized the eastern border of the Robb property as their boat access point. We understand the need for a new property owner to have this access legally declared to assure them access, which is why the three parties proposed a sale of land, from the Robb property to the Fiegers,to provide permanent access along the eastern property border of 570 Big Island. All parties were in accord and each member satisfied with this plan of accommodation. There is precedent for sale of land to adjoining property owners on Big Island including the purchase of land from (610 Big Island to 600 Big Island in 1993). Also, land was divided between the property owners at 670 Big Island and 650 Big Island as they divided and purchased the property in between them. It is our sincerest hope the council will recognize the benefits of having neighbors who resolve challenges together with a plan that works for all parties. We look forward to the council working diligently to retain this high level of consideration and accommodation we have built life-long relationships upon in this special island environment. In summary, it is important for the city of Orono to protect its public access locations on Lake Minnetonka as they serve specific purposes to ensure safety and allow the public the right to use city property. We feel that the solution agreed upon by the three property owners is the best path forward to preserve the right-of-way, protect the environment and provide access to the lake for the inland residents. Best regards, Donna, Brett, Jay and Eric Adams From: brian botham To: Melanie Curtis Subject: 580 Big Island dock access Date: Thursday,November 14,2019 11:34:57 AM Regarding: LA19-000086 J. Marie Fieger, 580 Big Island dock request It is my opinion that the City right-of way should not be blocked by a private boat dock. This access needs to be kept available for both public utility companies and the Fire and Police departments, the same as a Fire Lane on the main land. It is also the access point for construction materials and large deliveries for most of the island residences along the west shoreline. While I am sympathetic to J. Marie's situation, as this would be the easiest solution to her access problem, the City right-of-way is not the correct solution. Thank you. Brian Botham Recreation Point LLC 700 Big Island Orono, MN 55323 Brian Botham 387 Margaret Cr. Wayzata, MN 55391 612-490-7753 From: Thelma Bryson To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Donna Adams;whaleblazersaalhotmail.com;Willie Bryson Subject: Current Big Island Right of Way Date: Thursday,November 14,2019 11:12:29 AM We ( Brysons) are in agreement of the proposal for J Marie Fieger to accept Tom Robb's offer of an easememt/strip of land East of Robb's property at 570 Big Island, Orono to build a dock and have access to the Fieger property at 580 Big Island, Orono. William (Bill) and Thelma Bryson 670 Big Island, Orono From: Web Hill To: Melanie Curtis Subject: LA19-000086 3.Marie Fieger,580 Big Island dock request Date: Thursday,November 14,2019 1:30:25 PM I am writing you to express our concern and objection of the above referenced permit request to install a dock on the city right-of-way on the southwest side of Big Island. This right-of- way was established to provide access to the island for fire/police, public utility companies and barge deliveries. This access needs to be kept available for these services not a private dock. While I am sympathetic to the situation, I do not believe this is the right solution. Thank you Web Hill 620 Big Island Orono, Mn. 612-991-9387 RUN DATE:09/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 22-117-23 24 0001 38 22-117-23 31 0030 GERALD A ERICKSON JR ET AL PAMELA A MILLER 720 BIG ISLAND 640 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 GERALD A ERICKSON JR PAMELA A MILLER 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W 640 BIG ISLAND MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 22-117-23 24 0006 38 22-117-23 31 0031 RECREATION POINT LLC JANET MARIE FIEGER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 580 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 RECREATION POINT LLC JANET MARIE FIEGER 387 MARGARET CIR 275 S SUTTON LAKE BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 JORDAN MN 55352 38 22-117-23 24 0008 38 22-117-23 31 0032 RECREATION POINT LLC WEBSTER A HILL 700 BIG ISLAND 620 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 RECREATION POINT LLC WEBSTER ALAN HILL 387 MARGARET CIR PO BOX 27 WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 22-117-23 24 0010 38 22-117-23 31 0033 THELMA L BRYSON T J LAPPING&V L LAPPING 690 BIG ISLAND 610 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 THELMA L BRYSON THOMAS J&VENAL LAPPING 3082 WILLOW DR 8200 KINGSLEE RD MEDINA MN 55340 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 38 22-117-23 24 0011 38 22-117-23 31 0034 W E BRYSON II&T L BRYSON D L ADAMS&B D ADAMS TRSTS 670 BIG ISLAND 600 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 WILLIAM E BRYSON II DONNA LEE ADAMS THELMA L BRYSON 203 MILL ST#202 3082 WILLOW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MEDINA MN 55340 38 22-117-23 31 0001 38 22-117-2331 0035 FAUS FAMILY INVESTMENTS LP CINDA COLLINS REVOC TR ETAL 550 BIG ISLAND 650 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 FAUS FAMILY INVESTMENTS LP CINDA J COLLINS 3810 YORK AVE S 301 KENWOOD PKWY#301 MPLS MN 55410 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 38 22-117-23 31 0002 38 22-117-23 31 0036 CHRIST'S FAM CHRCH METRO INC JEFFREY A PERSON SUBJ/L E 560 BIG ISLAND 630 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 CHRIST'S FAM CHRCH METRO INC JEFFREY A PERSON 7375 BUSH LAKE RD 17345 9TH AVE N EDINA MN 55439 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 22-117-23 31 0020 JANET MARIE FIEGER 590 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 JANET MARIE FIEGER 275 S SUTTON LAKE BLVD JORDAN MN 55352 38 22-117-23 31 0028 CINDA COLLINS REVOC TR ETAL 650 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 CINDA J COLLINS 301 KENWOOD PKWY#301 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 38 22-117-23 31 0029 SELDEN THOMPSON ROBB JR 570 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 SELDEN THOMPSON ROBB JR 5010 MANITOU RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 9/23/2019 } `2 ;i :1:11.4'.:0414,4,44 :`�`-' 700 ...: at P . 720 670 tir# k ? s S R�{ 650 giii : 650 c +1 r w 'ice r ' ,- a �r,t ' ' 1119 't 640 g t; # .yf 560 e y..ss 620 Phi #! :E. 5- 5' ,t=r5r..,`40 s .a .�,. °"' 550 *S ft $, L i G ,# ;, 4, ; 4 d tom4..e*,,s -,, .'# - ..k-2,,,i'4';',.? fir ,��'� 44. 'f, 4� �'�z��� �,�, I a � 2s�- Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I i l l l l l l l 580 Big Island This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy, (ii)is fumished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,M N 55487/g isi nfo@hennepi n.us From: Thomas Laming_ To: Melanie Curtis Subject: LA19-000086 3.Marie Fieger,580 Big Island dock request permit Date: Friday,November 15,2019 11:48:45 AM Melanie, I am writing you to express our concern and objection to the above-referenced permit request to install a dock on the city right-of-way on the southwest side of Big Island. This right-of- way was established to provide access to the island for fire/police, public utility companies, and barge deliveries. This access needs to be kept available for these services, and a private dock will not be acceptable. All of us on the Island have been neighbors with the Fieger family for years. Tom Robb, the owner of 570 Big Island, has shared his dock and access to the property with the Fieger family for approximately 40 years. Mr. Rob stated that he is willing to sell an easement to the Fiegers. However, he has been told by the city that he does not have enough landmass to support an easement, yet the shared access has been in place since the J. Marie Fieger's parents purchased the property. If the city is going to make a change to its ordinance, this is the route I suggest the city makes. Using public access un-necessarily burdens everyone, and whoever buys the Fieger property will not want to be considered a burden to the neighbors on Big Island. The city should be willing to provide the easement to Tom Robb's 150' of lake access and keep the peace with all parties. Best, Tom Thomas Lapping tlapping@gmai l.com 612.669.1130 Date Application Received: 09/22/19 Date Application Considered as Complete:10/06/19 AWN4 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 02/03/20 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator G1 -1kEsHO From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 18 November 2019 Subject: #LA19-000087 Scott & Melissa Musgjerd at 4156 Highwood Rd and Douglas& Roban Smith at 4167 Highwood Rd, Right-of-Way Vacation Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicants are requesting City approval of vacation of the undeveloped 20-foot right-of-way between 4156 Highwood Road and 4167 Highwood Road. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background The applicants are requesting to vacate the unimproved 20-foot wide alley right-of-way directly abutting their properties. The right-of-way was originally dedicated with the plat Highwood Lake Minnetonka. The applicants have included a narrative with their application attached as Exhibit B. There is an existing City manhole and sewer line crossing the right-of-way. Due to the notification timing for the DNR review,the Public Hearing is to be continued at the City Council meeting. Applicable Regulations: V MN State Statute 412.851 VACATION OF STREETS The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley,public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four-fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks'published and posted notice. The council shall cause written notice of the hearing to be mailed to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation at least ten days before the hearing. The notice must contain, at minimum, a copy of the petition or proposed resolution as well as the time, place, and date of the hearing. In addition, if the street, alley,public grounds, public way, or any part thereof terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent to any public water, written notice of the petition or proposed resolution must be served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources at least 60 days before the hearing on the matter. The notice to the commissioner FILE#LA19-000087 18Nov19 Page 2 of 5 of natural resources does not create a right of intervention by the commissioner.At least 15 days prior to convening the hearing required under this section, the council or its designee must consult with the commissioner of natural resources to review the proposed vacation. The commissioner must evaluate: 1. the proposed vacation and the public benefits to do so; 2. the present and potential use of the land for access to public waters;and 3. how the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. The commissioner must advise the city council or its designee accordingly upon the evaluation.After a resolution of vacation is adopted, the clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings which shall contain the name of the city, an identification of the vacation, a statement of the time of completion thereof, and a description of the real estate and lands affected thereby. The notice shall be presented to the county auditor who shall enter the same in the transfer records and note upon the instrument, over official signature, the words "entered in the transfer record."The notice shall then be recorded with the county recorder.Any failure to file the notice shall not invalidate any vacation proceedings. ✓ MN State Statue 462.358 Subd. 7.Vacation The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways under a home rule charter or other provisions of law. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve". ✓ Orono City Code. Sec. 78-9. -Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this chapter;except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two weeks'published and posted notice, all as required by Minn. Stat. §412.851. The council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, and telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as boulevard reserve. ✓ Orono's 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan:Transportation Chapter 4A- Lake access, preservation and management, attached in Exhibit D. ✓ Orono's 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 4E Parks,Trails, and Open Spaces, attached as Exhibit E. FILE#LA19-000087 18 Nov 19 Page 3 of 5 City Engineer/Public Works Director Comments It is the Public Works Director's opinion that the Right of Way provides a public benefit and should not be vacated at this time. His comments are as follows: 1. The unimproved alley way is a lake access point for the city. It provides some drainage (unimproved)for the area and is used by some residents for access to the lake. 2. A sewer line crosses the alleyway and a sewer manhole is located within it. Should the right-of-way be vacated, a utility easement should be required. Although, admittedly it does not make sense to vacate a right-of-way, only to establish another easement. If vacated: a. A utility easement of 20 feet centered on the sanitary sewer line should be obtained. b. An access easement over the existing alleyway to the sanitary manhole should be obtained. c. An access easement for public access to the lake should be established. d. A drainage easement over the existing alleyway to provide for any current or future area drainage needs. Lastly, it appears that a stone retaining wall has been built within the right-of-way. The wall appears to have been built without a permit or encroachment agreement. The wall should be removed and site restored; or a permit processed and an encroachment agreement approved. Staff Analysis In addition to State statute and the DNR,the comprehensive plan provides some guidance on lake accesses. The comprehensive plan in the Parks, Open Space, and Trail Goals section (Exhibit E) states: • [Goal] 5.To maintain and increase access for all residents to the city's lake resources such as Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. (Part 4E, Page 6) • [Policy] 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City's intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5)To this end,the City will follow these policies: o Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby.The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. o The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. (Part 4E, Page 8) The Transportation section of the Comprehensive plan (Exhibit D) also discusses lake accesses: • "General Transportation Policy 5: It is the city's intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat)for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access FILE#LA19-000087 18 Nov 19 Page 4 of 5 corridors and fire lanes as requested,taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography,water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions,the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement." (Part 4A, Page 23) These policies are a departure from past practice,when the Council would not consider a vacation. The nearest lake access is approximately 670 feet to the east, between 4075 and 4051 Highwood. That lake access appears to be less overgrown and has a more gradual grade to the lake.That access also includes utility improvements,with a storm sewer. The Council, in approving recent lake access vacations (Case No. LA19-000017 Paidosh) has accepted an easement to protect existing infrastructure. In that application,the City Council considered the proximity and the number of lakes accesses within that same bay. Lake accesses are shown on the 4E-2, attached as Exhibit F. Staff has noted confusion on the part of commenters regarding the "drainage-way" notation on the Lake Access Points map in the Parks section, attached as Exhibit F. The notation is intended by the drafters to identify the main use of the access. This notation is not intended as a limitation on other uses. The transportation section does not identify the designated use in the same manner as the parks section. The neighbor comments indicate a history of using this alley to access the lake in summer and winter for recreation. DNR Comments The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has this request under review. A representative from the DNR, Nancy Spooner-Mueller, contacted staff with questions about the location of the vacation and indicated that comments would be forthcoming. She offered that the DNR recommendation was likely to be consistent with feedback in the past, and they would likely oppose the vacation.Their analysis indicated that the proposed vacation does not provide a public benefit nor does it protect future public use of the land to access the lake. Formal DNR comments have not been received;they are anticipated prior to the City Council's review on December 9th Public Comments Staff received written comments from neighbors which are attached as Exhibit L. Issues for Consideration — Does this request follow the Comprehensive Plan? — Does this request meet the statutory requirements for approval? — Would approving this action set precedent for future lake access vacations? — Are there any issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the request to vacate the right-of-way for the following reasons: 1. State Statute. The improvements within the right of way establish public purpose; state statute does not support vacation. 2. Finality. Vacation is final, and to reestablish access will in most cases be cost prohibitive. 3. Options. Vacation reduces options the Council can consider in the future. FILE#LA19-000087 18Nov19 Page 5 of 5 4. Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states the importance of lake access,this access is one of two in the neighborhood, and it is not known definitively which of the access is better,should the City desire to improve one of them. 5. DNR. The DNR Commissioner is expected to oppose the vacation,which has the effect of incrementally closing the lake to public use. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey Exhibit D. 2020-2040 Comp Plan Chapter 4A Transportation Exhibit E. 2020-2040 Comp Plan Chapter 4E Parks Exhibit F. Map 4E-2 Exhibit G. Utility Company Comments Exhibit H. 2012 Variance History Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Exhibit K. Aerial Photos Exhibit L. Public Comments Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 09/22/2019 Address: 4156 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723440019 Land Use Number: LA 19-000087 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: SCOTT & MELISSA MUSGJERD Address: 4156 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND, MN 55364 Applicant: Name: Melissa Musgjerd Company: Address: 4156 Highwood Rd Orono, MN 55364 mmusgjerd@studiom-int.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Scott Musgjerd scott.musgjerd@ubs.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Vacation Application Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application _J Appeal of Admin Decision l ' Concept Application Conditional Use Permit --1 Site Plan Application Subdivision Application i- Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application -. Applicant Signature: 10.2.19 We, Scott and Melissa Musgjerd, along with our neighbors, Douglas and Roban Smith are applying to the vacation of the firelane in between our two properties. We are proposing that the vacated lane be divided as proposed—12 feet to The Musgjerd's at 4156 Highwood Rd, Orono MN 55364 and 8 feet to The Smiths at 4167 Highwood Rd, Orono MN 55364. We are offering a donation of$35,000 dollars for the vacation of the firelane. We have discussed this amongst ourselves and will be dividing it 60/40. We, Scott and Melissa, are seeking the 12 feet as we are wanting to add on to our home. We have lived in the neighborhood for over five years and love everything about our neighborhood but were limited with our home size when we originally built. We have asked every year about the possibility of obtaining the firelane and have always been told that it was never a possibility. When Scott contacted Melanie and Jeremy a couple of weeks ago they informed us that the City Council is now looking at each of these properties and that we should apply for a vacation. Thank you, Scott& Melissa Musgjerd Douglas & Roban Smith 'urur ars (1J rtifirttir Proposed Lot Consolidation with Vacated Alley prepared for: SCOTT&MELISSA MUSGJERD 974.0 975.3 w Power X /974.0 itta"-,,,, ---.. 983.7 NE corner of Lot 24 c'm ^ 5 ozs s /uh N'Wcomer ofLot 23 Existing Alley e - _ _ Power O �,, GUY, 1e12,,ee ♦ i' R-O-W Shown in Alter.1 d I S 7- .72 72.4 i'O� 4T72 ' Yellow747 . • �7 X 97/.6 Basis for / /�e �; ,-I � 1" � w, bearings L 4s• E4 85°17'02"E g /17'..S'/ r 9s7 ��'7 4.54 w�s Power assumed 3.3 '/97/. <969.5 -,.t,:) ,x,956.6";:,6e_�-/i X .�� 4X 6 q� -"xy96�:_ 970.: m ynal 991.5_ // 2 J `r - - o / 0 r- //'--75- -_z 969.'197/.2 I .'5/ 6.3,-.,..-,g68 9 F L 97!4 //i • Denotes Found Iron Monument =/ . 5 ¢• / 96'4.x'.8 ' '•% 97/.� X969.4 6 8 1� /g I \ 966.2 +, ��'I /. , G(t 0 Denotes Iron Monument / l - R 6 p,.e•-964 s :,u -4/.6 O.O. 965 5� � is 9 2.3 /'---,,____ Denotes Existing Contours /; xi c, '2--T-9X62 6 1 4/ 'pies t t•.:• �. 7//3/X, X 963: e''96 „?6-'2'-'7--, 6-4.-1,.." /9i ' 968.0 '' x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation '(2 ■i/ a.96 x-§60C4„6. ----97995 '5 2:14:'�"�•� P Y 23.6 Orr l,� GARAGE -_____til i•,cg595 .60.4 960x ' w \I = I �: x964 // /k ,5'�uyie -_X9-- 958.0 a l ! , 'v__-/ ,959;z___964:0-.55.3 .9 62�x____I._�•• .I, I• 966�; �-`y 970.7 FFE /1-�9 d'7--.5-5-75-,-`95:.g' -X955'5 ___j._''° + 2.0 966.5 i 968.7 S96ri 6 9J - 3 ¢ r�, . • ' W t� '� °ee ....9 reZ r W h I v\• PPf /��x/k 953.4 x95 52. I` ^w'j OO 7 n,• 1 II 970.0 9,5/6 I 49 5 I,;, 95Tj �, cry vv` RESIDENCE N w z I M t 9�.2 i''- Wo4/59 �e / cs'..: ^�5 •L�`n • I s3 % ,I,i.o.96/7 WO Wi c• 1 ]T / x t / O.5 . al 23 6 � \ / .0 __ F 4 I ' �� 5• '-�� .955.5? I , c ,'i�//y41 ; 9B 945.5 I-f� : I�p ct •9p6 Bali co t o► •- 49 949.1 X 14167HOAwood Road N , -7 ih 10'0.0 / 6/ • .47.•'. /,. v N . ___ 958.3 I ' `_7 X '8.5 ,,,, ; /-951, ,k-,-)12.4"5 - t.- i$`•,,,;5","„`'954.• I I S • 948.9.... / i /�P 943.5 it / - n/' X 4\ �' 1__ tt x / )8S x / ``v 19-2.6---;- .4e,..7 944.Y94e-`. / li 0o- --MF .,-r,.� .ss`6 ,. // MI 497 / _ t�l "I 41561Lehtuond7Wwd `\999` lD.3 •oat /' ./ rix___Al.;, ela - `_992 1 ,` _ _ :38 I e X 38/9 -''93 4, 4,:c5,,,-4,1,-wry934x34 7 46_ \\ *41.4/ .r 912.0 _935.:-3,- a„s l---2 � .: I 4 7e -.r:i I/ F • /S"'. .v //cl 937. 9!"„ .6.8 1934.9 --- -_ a t , k -934=-935.3 3 0. / y ,/ I t 7-'4';", yt I ,- X 933.033.2 I 9 ,ot„,4,9.�.a 33tpO, �'S�.Sl. 93 1` IX934.0 x PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION DESCRIPTION • 'aeiy7/rcF.s'w°cam `�i t/� . `•3�933.s To vacate that part of the Alley as donated and +l \ C `,•2/ff•02 / 'I 932.q 932.4 / dedicated on the recorded plat of Highwood Lake �•� �l,r • • ;S/�� ' 935 s '56° 4.27,E 61.74---- h32 23 Minnetonka,(Hennepin County,Minnesota,which lies �'"• � °�• 4 �. p 933 4 -f'• e ,6 x between Lot 23 and 24 and which lies Southerly of a .r { n0.C� \ x s, /y 32 o line drawn between the northwest corner of said Lot ,(- ' j1,,`,' x 5x932o ! 23 and the northeast corner of said Lot 24. �/\� _ l /1932 929 30 Manhole ,v4`2---,-,/ ET ones=929.4 - :"' a Ojl/,� RlP RaP PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 4156 Highwood Road: Lot 23,Highwood Lake Minnetonka,Hennepin County,Minnesota and the 4156 Highwood Road: Easterly 12.0 feet of the vacated alley lying adjacent thereto. Lot 23,Highwood Lake Minnetonka,Hennepin County,Minnesota 4167 Highwood Road: 4167 Highwood Road: Lot 24,Highwood Lake Minnetonka,Hennepin County,Minnesota and that Lot 24,Highwood Lake Minnetonka,Hennepin County,Minnesota part of the vacated alley lying adjacent thereto and lying West of the Easterly 12.0 feet thereof. Project No. 83749A Scale: 1"=30' NOTE:The only easements shown are from plats of Property located in Section Drawn By record or information provided by client. 7,Township 117,Range 23, F.B.NO. 1 109-64rawn y Y-k$ I Certify that this survey,plan,or report was prepared by me or under my I lennepin County,Minnesota Address:4156&4167 Highwood Road direct supervision and that I ate a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under Orono,MN the laws of the State of Minnesota D E M n R C _ Surveyed this 2.. ay of October 2019. LAND SURVEYING a ENGINEERING Signed /_ri-. / 7601 73rd Avenue North (763)560-3093 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com Gry R.•rasch,Minn.Reg.No.24992 F3survey tighwood-hennepin\23-24\83749A\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Bese.dwg CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction 4A-2 Purpose and Scope 4A-2 Roadways 4A-3 Table 4A-1 Roadways Classification Summary 4A-4 Table 4A-2 A Minor Arterials 4A-5 Table 4A-3 Collectors 4A-6 Table 4A-4 MSA Roads 4A-7 Table 4A-5 Road Design Capacity 4A-8 Table 4A-6 Road Capacity 4A-9 Fig. 4A-2 Ring Road Concept 4A-10 Table 4A-7 Future Capacity 4A-11 Fig 3 Access Curve 4A-11 Fig. 4 Maintenance/Cost Curve 4A-12 Table 4A-8 Maintenance 4A-13 Trails 4A-14 Lake Access 4A-16 Table 4A-9 Lake Access Points 4A-17 Transit 4A-20 Freight 4A-20 Aviation 4A-21 Implementation Plan. 4A-21 Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives 4A-22 Table 4A-11 Transportation History 4A-25 Appendices 4A-A. TAZ Zones Map 4A-1 Functional Classification Map 4A-2 Jurisdiction Classifications Map 4A-3 Traffic Analysis zones Map 4A-4 Traffic and Crash Information Map 4A-5 Forecasted Traffic Information Map 4A-6 Non-motorized facilities and Points of Interest Map 4A-7 Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure Map 4A-8 Freight,Rail, and Heavy Commercial Corridors City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 1 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The City of Orono's transportation system generally operates well today. The City's multimodal transportation system includes facilities for personal vehicles, freight, walking, and bicycling. Facilities are operated by a number of agencies, including the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, MnDOT, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad. This transportation chapter has been prepared in compliance with state statues and applicable Metropolitan Council guidelines. As part of this plan, the City has reviewed existing and future conditions for each mode and identified safety, operations, and network improvements that will be important to address before 2040. The City has also developed goals, objectives, and strategies to preserve and improve the transportation system. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) This plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The TPP is a regional plan that evaluates the existing transportation system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current residents while accommodating the region's anticipated growth. The TPP also guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and established regional performance measures and targets. The TPP is guided by the following goals: • Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets. • Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users. • Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. • Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State. • Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system contributes to communities' livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments. • Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity, and sustainability. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A,Page 2 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan • Lake Access, Preservation, and Management. Access to the Lake recognizes the value of the lake and reinforces the desire to protect its value to the community and the region. Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current transportation revenue will not meet the region's transportation needs through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long- term investment scenarios: a fiscally-constrained scenario under current revenue, and an increased revenue scenario that identifies priorities should additional transportation funding become available. Under the current fiscally constrained revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway mobility and access are limited to those that address multiple TPP goals and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility, access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth. Orono's Place within the TPP Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. The TPP does not include any planned regional investments in Orono. Density Allocation With two communities in one, rural and urban, Orono finds that higher density development sites are most appropriate adjacent to high volume transportation corridors, within MUSA, and near commercial services (employment, shopping, etc.) While historically located primarily in the Navarre area, additional appropriate sites were identified in the north Orono area, due in part to capacity and safety constraints of the County Road 15 and 19 intersection in Navarre. ROADWAYS The sections below provide information about the existing and future roadway system within Orono; including functional classification,jurisdictions, capacity, safety, access management, and maintenance. Functional Classification System The Functional Classification System organizes a roadway and street network that distributes traffic from local neighborhood streets to collector roadways, then to minor arterials and ultimately the principal arterial system. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land and mobility for through traffic. Functional classification gives an indication of the relative hierarchy of roadways in the transportation network. Four classes of roadways are included in the Seven-County Metropolitan Area functional classification City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 3 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan system:principal arterials,minor arterials,collector streets,and local streets.Map 4A-1 shows the existing functional classification of each road in the City of Orono and Map 4A-2 shows existing roadway jurisdiction. The following sections describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways fall into each classification. Table -1 Roadway Cla s kation Summary Table Criteria Principal Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Arterial Place Connections Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects metro centers major trip neighborhoods blocks and regional generators and minor within business business neighborhoods concentrations concentrations and land parcels within Intersections Grade separated Traffic signals, All-way stops, As required for or high-capacity roundabouts and roundabouts and safe operation intersection cross-street stops some traffic controls signals Parking None Restricted as Restricted as Usually necessary necessary unrestricted Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct Limited access to Access to Unrestricted property access property properties is property access common Typical Average 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 1,000-15,000 Less than 1,000 Daily Traffic Posted Speed 45-65 mph 35-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 Limits mph Right-of-way 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Width Transit Priority access Preferential Designed for use Normally used Accommodations for transit in treatment where by regular route as bus routes peak periods needed buses only in non- residential areas Principal Arterials Principal arterials are roadways that provide the greatest level of mobility and access control. Within the metropolitan area, the great majority of principal arterials are under MnDOT jurisdiction. Principal arterials are typically Interstate highways or other state or US freeways or expressways. Principal arterials also connect to other cities, regions, and states outside of the metropolitan area. Principal arterials are intended to maintain average speeds of 40 mph during peak traffic periods.To maintain mobility and speeds on principal arterials, land access and transportation system connections are limited. There is little to no direct land access from principal arterials.Access is limited to interstate freeways,other Principal Arterials, and A Minor Arterials. Access points are typically grade-separated or controlled with a signal and are spaced approximately one to two miles apart. Within the City of Orono, there is one principal arterial: US Highway 12. The TPP does not identify City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 4 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan any specific regional mobility improvements on this highway, including expansion of any lanes, although maintenance and preservation investments will be made on all highways. Highway 12 is currently 2 lanes, in the "Super Two" Concept. The lanes are separated by a concrete barrier to address safety concerns raised in the last 10 years. Minor Arterials The minor arterial system supplements the principal arterial system and provides connections to the principal arterial system. Minor arterials also support access to major traffic generators, including regional job concentrations and freight terminals,and between rural centers within and just outside the region. Access points along minor arterials are generally at-grade and typically controlled with signals or stop signs. The Metropolitan Council has established a system of "A" Minor and Other Minor arterials. "A" Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has further split"A"Minor arterials into four types,described below. The City has three (3) miles of minor arterial roads. :41r VC.f 1:tt 441 A Minor Arterials Other Relievers Augmenters Expanders Connectors Purpose Provide Supplement Supplement the Provide safe, These supplementary the principal principal arterial direct roadways capacity for arterial system system in less connections connect major congested, in more densely between rural traffic parallel densely developed or centers and to generators in principal developed or redeveloping principal arterials the region. arterial redeveloping areas in rural areas Other arterials areas without adding are not eligible continuous for federal general purpose funding lane capacity Hennepin CSAH 112(3 CSAH 6 (2 CSAH 6 (West CSAH 19 (N County Lanes) Lanes) of McCulley of CSAH 15; System CSAH 15 (2 Rd, 2 Lanes) 2 Lanes) Lanes) CSAH 19 (S of 15, 2 Lanes) Orono McCulley Road System (2 Lanes) Collector Streets Collector streets provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one another. Collector streets generally favor access to the system over mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. These roadways are generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. They are usually owned and operated by cities,although counties operate some of these facilities. Orono has 20 miles of Collector Streets. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 5 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-3: Collectors Major Collector Minor Collector Major collectors serve higher density Minor collectors serve shorter local trips and lower Purpose residential areas (often penetrating density land uses (often penetrating residential residential neighborhoods for neighborhoods only for a short distance). significant distances),job and activity centers and freight terminals that are not on the arterial system, and they serve longer local trips, including local bus service. Existing Other CSAH 84 (Bayside/Leaf Fox St/Old CSAH 151 (West Branch North Arm Dr) Jurisdictions Crystal Bay Rd) CSAH 51 North Shore Dr) CSAH 146 (Brown Road S) CR 201 (Homestead Tr) CSAH 135 (Tonkawa Rd) Existing Orono Brown Road N Stubbs Bay Rd (Bayside Ferndale Rd W System Old Crystal Bay Road(N of Fox) to Watertown) Hunter Dr Watertown Road Ferndale Rd N North Arm Dr Willow Drive (S of CSAH 112, north Kelley Pky Orono Orchard Rd of Fox) Leaf Street Tamarack Dr Fox Street(Willow to Brown) Casco Point Road Wildhurst Trail Ferndale Road W) Dunwoody Ave Fox Street(W of Willow and E of Brown) Local Streets Local streets connect blocks and land parcels, and the primary emphasis is on land access. In most cases, local streets connect to other local streets and collectors. In some cases,they connect to minor arterials. Local streets serve short trips at low speeds. Local streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of Orono. Orono currently has 27 miles of publicly owned local streets. Orono's history has had a significant impact on the local road way systems. Northern Rural Orono Roads The straight-line road grid system in central and northern Orono was established along section lines a century ago to efficiently serve the agricultural activity in the City. This grid has readily adapted to use as a collector system for the many local and private roads created to serve new rural residential subdivisions in the last 40-50 years. Southern Lakeshore Roads The seasonal recreational uses that grew up along Orono's 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline a City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 6 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan century ago resulted in a network of winding roads that commonly followed the center of the narrow peninsulas between bays, creating local road frontage for lakeshore lots while also often serving as the main road between settlements. A large number of these roads do not meet current specifications as they are narrow, winding roads with steep slopes. Private Roads A private road is a privately owned and privately maintained road, located in the rural area or within a planned development that functions as a local access street. In order to curb maintenance expenses the city has,since the 1980s,maintained a policy that developments in Orono's rural area would be serviced by privately maintained roads. The city does require that the private roads are built to city standards and that the city is granted an underlying easement to ensure right of access. As a result Orono currently has 20 miles of privately owned and maintained roads. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. Rural properties should be served by private streets unless through streets. State Aid Roads To support the state's system of streets, roads and bridges, MnDOT distributes funds for highway maintenance and construction to counties, cities and townships based on a formula determined by the Legislature. The roads that are on the state aid system � �' typically carry heavier traffic Name Description State Aid# volumes, connect major Willow Dr County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 101 points of interest, and provide Old Crystal Bay County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 102 an integrated and coordinated Rd road system. The majority of Watertown Rd Willow Dr to County Road 6 MSAS 103 the county Roads within McCulley Rd Entirety MSAS 104 Orono are designated County Fox St Old Crystal Bay Rd to MSAS 105 State Aid Highways (CSAH). Brown Rd The City has 9.45 miles of Brown Rd N County Road 6 to Wayzata MSAS 107 roadway eligible for Blvd Municipal State Aid (MSA). Leaf St Watertown Rd to Bayside MSAS 109 Rd Ferndale Rd County road 6 to City MSAS 110 Boundary Planned Functional Classification Changes There are no planned changes to functional classifications of roads within Orono. However, four jurisdictional transfers are under consideration based on existing functional classification and traffic patterns. McCulley Road to Hennepin County to tie CSAH 19 to CSAH 6. Bayside Road (CSAH 84)From Hennepin County to Orono. Tonkawa Road(CSAH 135)from Hennepin County to Orono. West Branch/North Shore (CSAH 151) from Hennepin County to Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 7 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Roadway Capacity A roadway's capacity indicates how many vehicles may use a roadway before it experiences congestion. Capacity is largely dependent upon x.-" the number of lanes. Table 4A-5 lists planning- Roadway Type Daily Capacity level thresholds that indicate a roadway's Planning Level(ADT) capacity. Additional variation (more or less Two-lane undivided 10,000 capacity) on an individual segment is influenced urban by a number of factors including: amount of Two-lane undivided 15,000 access, type of access, peak hour percent of rural traffic, directional split of traffic, truck percent, opportunities to pass, and amount of turning Three lane urban 17,000 traffic, the availability of dedicated turn lanes, (two-lane divided with turn lanes) parking availability, intersection spacing, signal timing and a variety of other factors. Roadway Capacity—Traffic Forecasting The Metropolitan Council uses Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) for traffic forecasting. Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Orono, is divided into a series of TAZs (see Map 4A-3). The TAZ data for Orono can be found at Appendix 4A-A. The modeling shows the majority to the projected growth in the city within the TAZs that correspond with City Municipal Utility Service Areas (MUSA)which further corresponds to the cities areas for higher existing and planned densities. Current and Future Regional/Hennepin County Capacity At the planning level, capacity problems are identified by comparing the existing number of lanes with current traffic volumes. The table below illustrates the existing number of lanes on state and county arterial roadways within the City. To identify the need for potential future capacity improvements, Hennepin County compared 2030 forecasts to planning-level roadway capacities. Nearly all State and County roadways within the City have adequate capacity to handle forecast 2040 traffic volumes with little to minimal congestion. (See Map 4A-4). Based on traffic counts in 2015 the only Hennepin County road currently undersized based on capacity is Shoreline Drive(CSAH 15). The 2015 ADT for CSAH 15 was 17,600. Those roads projected to exceed their design capacity by 2030 are highlighted red below. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 8 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-6: Road Capacity Road Name Type #of Lanes State Aid Current 2040 Route# ADT ADT Estimated Highway 12 Principal Two Lane-divided NA 23,100 UKN Arterial Wayzata Blvd Minor Three-lane-urban CSAH 112 11,000 15,900 Arterial County Road 6 Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 11,000 8000 Arterial undivided-rural Watertown Road Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 10,000 14200 (CR6) Arterial undivided-rural Shoreline Drive Minor Two-lane, CSAH 15 17,600 22,000 Arterial undivided-rural Shadywood Drive(N Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 5,700 7400 of 15) Arterial undivided-rural Shadywood Drive (S Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 11,900 13100 of 15) Arterial undivided-rural Northshore Drive Collector Two-lane, CSAH 51 4650 5700 undivided-rural Brown Road S Collector Two-lane, CSAH 146 1450 2200 undivided-rural West Branch Collector Two-lane, CSAH 151 1750 2300 undivided-rural Bayside, Leaf, Fox Collector Two-lane, CSAH 84 690 1100 Streets undivided-rural Old Crystal Bay Road Collector Two-lane, CSAH 84 1800 2600 S undivided-rural Tonkawa Road Collector Two-lane, CSAH 135 560 800 undivided-rural Homestead Trail (CR Collector Two-lane, 1050 1400 201) undivided-rural * Data from Hennepin county's 2040 ADT Forecast prepared in 2018 County Road 15 is the primary minor arterial for commuter traffic through southern Orono. Because County Road 15 abuts the shoreline along much of its route,the City is committed to retaining its character as that of a scenic parkway serving local residences. Such a character is incompatible with its minor arterial function.It would therefore be preferable to reduce the volume of traffic on County Road 15 by providing an additional east-west corridor in southern Orono. However,the configuration of Lake Minnetonka's bays and the severe topography between them, as well as the large number of wetlands in the shoreland City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 9 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan areas,preclude the development of such a corridor. To address this issue, the Ring Route was established in 1980 by connecting County Road 19 to County Road 6 via McCulley Road,providing a relatively direct route northeastward to Highway 12 from the western Lake Minnetonka area. The City will encourage the use of this ring route to address traffic congestion through the Navarre Area. Maple Pla n "' ip .1.f '' 201 12 Q) +' Medina p. m ;o j./. MIMIIMIMIMIM. O' Y n.e.en.en.• O e 2t �( 4, fi ► !riir" 1! a16%•7"K-, 12 1101"--, 11TI �CJ6 0 1 �r a 011111Willw Wayzata — Minne ' .® \ Ilk tit CD ' i \ -! J 1 � r -p ®, t�, ,i*• --r` o` mai 1. 1._ 'err 4 \:\ se' s'• S Figure 4A-2 Ring Road 4—'" , 9 .' Concept Congestion policies The City will continue to work with the County and other transportation agencies to facilitate improvements to the transportation networks. This assistance may include right of way or easement procurement, staging of Orono projects, and information outreach. Orono Roadway Current and Future Capacity Collector and minor arterial roads under the City's jurisdiction are all two-lane roadways, are currently, and are projected to remain under their maximum capacity guidelines of 15,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Forecasted 2040 traffic volumes are shown on Map- 4A-5. Right of Way Expansion The City has not identified any critical right of way acquisition needs. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 10 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Road Name Type #of Lanes State Aid 2015 2040 ADT Route# ADT Estimated* Fox St Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 105 1025 1639 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 1948 3116 Rural Willow Dr Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 101 4319 6908 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 4708 7530 Rural Watertown Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 103 4428 7083 Rural McCulley RD Minor 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 104 5633 9010 Arterial Rural * the 2040 ADT estimate is based on the 2015 ADT x the Increase in the # of households which is 60% Roadway Safety Providing a safe transportation system for all users is a high priority for the city. This needs to be accomplished through a combination of engineering, education, and enforcement and is to be targeted towards all users including drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The City continues to proactively work with the county and other regional local and state partners to incorporate safety into all transportation designs and efforts. In order to address safety issues on city streets the City adopted a Traffic Management Policy in 2014. The policy is intended to provide a systematic process for the City to address traffic concerns by a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management and safety techniques. Access Management The purpose of access management is to provide adequate access to adjacent land development while maintaining acceptable traffic flow on higher 4Freeway level roadways. Management consists of carefully Principal Arterial controlling the spacing and design of public street /� L , Minor Arterial intersections and private access points to the public �- k,. Major Collector roadway system. Arterials, being designed for higher speed, longer distance trips, generally have m Minor Collector reduced or restricted access, while local streets can Local Street accommodate much greater access. Collector roadways fall in between arterials and local `-Cul De sac roadways regarding the amount of access that is ( Increasing Access ----- permitted. The agency with jurisdiction over a Figure 4A-3: Access roadway sets access management guidelines. Curve City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 11 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Regional/County Road Access Access to US 12 must meet MnDOT access management guidelines. Hennepin County has established access management guidelines for county roads.Hennepin County requires permits for new driveway access to county roads and when land uses change at a site adjacent to a county road. In addition, the county reviews development plats for access management compliance. Hennepin County typically requires that new access points meet its guidelines; however, the county can make exceptions to the guidelines with sufficient justification. (See Hennepin County Transportation Plan for detailed county access requirements and guidelines). Orono Access Management Management of access to principal and minor arterials is necessary to ensure a safe and efficient arterial system. Direct individual property access to arterials is regulated in the Orono Municipal Code by requiring development of local or private roads to serve new residential developments of 3 or more units; by limiting the number of curb cuts per residence; by prohibiting direct access to principal arterials; and by a number of other regulations involving the location, type and number of access points to the arterial roadway system. However,many of southern Orono's arterials near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline have historically served a dual function as both arterials and as local/collector streets, due to geographic and topographic limitations. It should be noted that there are existing access points that do not meet City, County, and MnDOT access spacing guidelines. In most cases these access points were established prior to agency access spacing guidelines. In other cases the agency has granted an exception to the existing guidelines. As roadways are reconstructed, each of these agencies generally works to modify and/or relocate access points that do not meet current access spacing guidelines in the interest of long term safety and efficiency. Pavement Preservation /Maintenance. Pavement Preservation is a program employing a network level, long-term strategy to c710 75%Time enhance pavement performance $1.00 of �\ 40% Renovation by using integrated, cost- > Quality +/(` Cost Here effective set of practices that 8 �� Drop Lowest Annual Will Cost$4.00 extend pavement life, improve0 0 Resurfacing Cost to $5.00 It Delayed to safety and meet resident's — 6 Here. expectations. As the diagram to u_ the right illustrates, as the —— 4 pavement condition decreases, 8 40% the cost for the appropriate a. 2 Quality method of repair can increase Drop Total Failure significantly. Maintenance a. 12%lime activities applied to surfaces in 4 8 12 16 better condition, such as Years sealcoats thin or structural (Time Varies for Each Road Section) Source:"7he Hole Story,"American Public Works Association overlays may prove to be more cost effective than waiting until the pavement is in Figure 4A-4: Maintenance/cost curve poor condition when it is necessary to perform more costly maintenance or reconstruction. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 12 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan An effective preservation programs addresses pavements while they are still in good condition. A cost-effective treatment in a timely manner will restore the pavement almost to its original condition. By doing so, the cumulative costs of such treatment are substantially less then reconstruction or major rehabilitation over the life of the pavement. In addition the disruption of traffic is less for more frequent and minimal treatments in comparison to larger construction treatments. A proper Pavement Preservation program consists of three primary components: Table 4A-8 Maintenance t fi Type Description Examples Preventive A planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to Chip sealing maintenance an existing roadway system and its appurtenances Slurry or micro surfacing that preserves the system, retards future Thin overlay deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity). Routine Day-to-day activities that are scheduled by Cleaning of ditches&structures maintenance maintenance personnel to maintain and preserve Pavement markings maintenance the pavement at a satisfactory level. Crack filling Pavement patching Minor Minor Structural enhancements that extend the Overlays rehabilitation service life of an existing pavement and/or Mill and Overlay improve its load carrying capacity. Geiger, D.R.,Pavement Preservation Definitions, FHWA Memorandum dated 12 September 2005. County Road/Pavement Maintenance Hennepin County implemented a pavement management system in 1996 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. The Program is used by the County to develop priorities for pavement maintenance projects on county roads. (See Hennepin county Transportation Plan for details on their Maintenance program) Orono Road/Pavement Maintenance The primary need for Orono Roadways in the coming years is maintenance. Over the last decade Orono had underfunded road maintenance and replacement operations and therefore the roads have fallen in to disrepair. Orono adopted a pavement management system in 2014 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. While a certain share of the City's annual levy is dedicated to Pavement Management Fund (PMF) each year for maintenance, much of the city's infrastructure is aging. This is particularly challenging in the older,more developed parts of the city. Many of these roads are old, were not initially designed to support the land use forms desired today, are not pedestrian or bicycle friendly, and are in need of both infrastructure and land use revitalization. Also a lack of adequate funding for preventive maintenance activities has resulted in a great deal of deferred maintenance. This deferred maintenance has undesirable consequences from a financial as well as a user perspective, and effective planning is needed to ensure that quality infrastructure is sustained over time. Streets that receive no preventive maintenance are often beyond repair in just ten years, while streets that are properly maintained at critical stages in the life-cycle can last up City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 13 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan to twenty-five years or more. Local roadway maintenance has the potential to become more of an issue in the future due to Orono's reliance on privately maintained roads to serve the rural neighborhoods. Orono's 20 miles of private rural area roadways are currently maintained by individual property owners or through neighborhood homeowners associations. Conversion of these private roadways to a public status with public maintenance would result in Orono's road maintenance costs increasing substantially. Bridge Maintenance State and County Bridges The vast majority of bridges located within Orono fall under the jurisdiction of the state and county. Orono Bridges All three bridges under Orono roadway jurisdiction have been completely replaced within the past ten years. These include the bridges on West Ferndale Road, Fox Street, and McCulley Road. The three bridges are enrolled in the state bridge maintenance system and receive bi-annual inspections. The weight capacity of the bridges under Orono jurisdiction are as follows: Ferndale, 36 ton; Fox, 60 ton; and McCulley, 33 ton. TRAILS This section addresses network needs for walking and bicycling within the City of Orono. This section includes information on the existing non-motorized transportation network within Orono, connections to land use planning,the planned local non-motorized transportation network, and the planned regional non- motorized transportation network. This section also includes recommendations for intersection improvements and design best practices. This section also addresses the needs of people using wheelchairs and assistive mobility devices such as mobility scooters, as they are considered pedestrians. Existing Non-Motorized Transportation System The existing non-motorized transportation system consists of sidewalks, multi-use paved trails, turf trails, and paved shoulders. Map 4A-6depicts the existing and planned trails within the City limits of Orono. There are currently limited facilities for walking and bicycling in the City, and these facilities serve recreational uses better than transportation uses. There is not currently a connected network in place to serve the needs of people bicycling and walking for transportation. Regional Non-Motorized Transportation Network The Metropolitan Council established a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) in 2015. The RBTN establishes regional priorities for bicycle transportation so that regional destinations are accessible by bicycle. Regional multi-use trails within the City limits include the Luce Line, Dakota and Independence Regional trails and are owned and operated by Three Rivers Park District and the Minnesota DNR. Several existing and planned trails and shoulders will be key links in the expanding regional non-motorized transportation network. A Tier 1 alignment, identified in the RBTN, includes a segment of Shadywood,north from excelsior,connecting to the Dakota Rail Trail. There are no other connections contemplated by the RBTN. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 14 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Orono Non-Motorized Transportation Network Sidewalks are generally located within newer residential developments and more dense residential and commercial portions of the city. As part of our recreation-open space plan, Orono has developed a trail plan focused on providing links between both local and regional recreational and open space areas, as well as links within the urban areas for pedestrian and bicycle access to Orono's Navarre commercial area and links between the Orono Schools and the Long Lake downtown area. Connections to Land Use Planning The City of Orono has development patterns consistent with its designation as an Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community. Existing residential development is low density and commercial land uses are separated from residential land uses. This means that people walking and bicycling must cover greater distances to reach commercial areas from their homes. The development patterns in the City are better suited to bicycling than walking, due to the distance between residential and commercial areas of the City. Non-Motorized Transportation Design Considerations As non-motorized facilities are planned and designed, the City should consult additional planning and design resources, including: • Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan • Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual • Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices • Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials • Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials • Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)—US Access Board Accessibility Accessibility is a very important consideration for non-motorized design. All new pedestrian and bicycle facilities must meet the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility guidelines. To address accessibility issues, the City developed and adopted and ADA transition plan in 2017 aimed at bringing sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA guidelines. Trail Policy It is the policy of the City to encourage the development of sidewalks and trails. In urban densities, sidewalks should be added to at least one side of roads. In all development densities, connections to the existing or planned trail network should be made or rights preserved. The City will support the expansion of trails and or bike lanes if feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 15 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan LAKE ACCESS, PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. This value was long ago realized by City leaders. In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16'to 66' in width. These right-of-ways (often referred to as "fire lanes" or "lake access roads") vary considerably in their proximity to traffic,parking availability,proximity to housing, lakeshore conditions,and other factors that effect their recreational value. Some of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice-fishing accesses. Certain accesses have docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography, shallow water depths, undesirable lake bottom conditions, and/or dense vegetation and experience little or no usage. Of the City lake accesses shown in Table 4A-9,half of those located outside of Big Island are either undeveloped or closed to public use. In addition to Orono's relatively small public lake access corridors, other governmental agencies own and operate significantly larger lake access properties in Orono. These include the DNR Maxwell Bay Access, Hennepin County's North Arm Access and Hennepin County's Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park.These three large facilities benefit from Metro Transit bus service on their County Road 51 frontage, and are used regularly by visitors from the greater metropolitan area and beyond. The Noerenberg Gardens lack the docks and ramps supplied at the nearby Maxwell Bay and North Arm locations, however the Noerenberg shoreline in Maxwell Bay is a popular place for boaters to anchor and swim. Even more popular destinations for Lake Minnetonka boaters are the Hennepin County beach at Cruiser's Cove on Big Island, and Orono's Big Island Park, which has dockage and hiking areas. Orono also owns and operates Summit Park on Long Lake. Orono offers public lake access through five commercial marinas within its boundaries. Its private recreational facilities with lake shore are Camp Teko on North Arm Bay and the Minnetonka Power Squadron on Big Island. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 16 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan t t R €4* sic A i e c' ' r s Designated se '`c t r i vreID Access Name Plat Between Designated UPDATED 4-24-2018 or Street Section Address Use # Name #s Notes Brown's Bay(Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline -- Shoreline Drive - 2-S Across from Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area "Molly's Corner" 1410 and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; (Outlot A, Shoreline popular fishing spot;winter vehicular access feasible. Dragonfly Hill) Fire Boat dockage Smith Bay(Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Winter vehicular access allowed. Spates 3 North Shore Drive 10-S Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep at Shoreline Drive slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay -- North Shore Drive 9-S 2605/2655 No longer a public access ("Town Road") 4 North Shore Drive 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30'wide platted road right-of-way at Baldur Park Road -- North Shore Drive 17-N 3685/3705 33' wide eastward extension of North Shore Drive east of Shadywood (Hennepin County jurisdiction) Road 5 Shadywood Road at 17-N 1998/2000 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on Sunset Dr either side 6 Crystal Bay Road 17-S Adj to 2264 66'wide platted road extending to lakeshore;City also (West end) Shadywood owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200'of shoreline,over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for "boating and bathing"... status currently under discussion 7 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3405/3415 20' relocated alley from Railroad property to (Relocated shoreline;potential lake access from railway corridor. extension of The only known documentation is Doc.#507616 deed Bayview Place in filed Nov. 10,1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which plat of "Wallace's states that the 20'strip is"heretofore taken for street Addition...") purposes" and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 8 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3339/3345 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer (Platted extension of lines, potential access from neighborhood and Hillside Place) Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing-Fox 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian Tax records show access as Outlot A,owned by owner St. year-round, of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City vehicles winter maintains access only City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 17 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Stubbs Bay I 'Access Name P Between Designated Use ; '� Sec ion Address#'s 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30'platted road gated March 1 -Dec. 1 11 Bayside Rd. at 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33'platted road("Oak Street" in plat of"Bay View Stubbs Bay Rd. Park") Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from NA Two 60'platted roads and one 65'platted road to the 3640,3700, Lake(Park,Spring,and Maple Streets in plat of Bay 3750 Bayside View Park;and Theresa St.in plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka). These potential access points are not opened for public use. 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of NA 30'realigned platted road(Realigned"Lake Street"in 3775 Bayside the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka)(See street file 3775 Bayside).Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 30'platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only. North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60'wide platted road,paved to shoreline-usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 30'wide platted road,not developed,steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from NW end of platted developed road as it extends to 1384/1392 shoreline 18 Oak Place (Platted 8-S 3768/3818 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from road in plat of North Shore North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to "Crystal Bay Dr shoreline;mostly wetland or under water View") 19 Sandy Beach 8-S 3898/3908 Swimming 60'wide platted roadway used for City beach (Extension of Maple Cherry Ave Beach Place) 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/ 50'wide platted road,undeveloped 1330 Cherry P1 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway,undeveloped 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40'wide platted road;also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 60' wide platted road right-of-way , access not developed,walking use only 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 20'wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 "Summit Avenue" 7-S 1067/1101 50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to (Extension of shoreline Elmwood Avenue) 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not 1453 Park Dr developed West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive 7-S "4795" 33'platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co.Rd. west end (adjacent 19 plus tax-forfeited Lot 10,Block 6,"Bergquist and Shoreline to Orono/M'trista Wicklund's Park..."; undeveloped corridor primarily border) for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 18 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ID Access Name Plat Between Design 0 Use Section Address#'2 �' 28 North Shore Drive 7-S 4731/4745 40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of at "Adams Street" "Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..." undeveloped, Extension very steep,used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 33'platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline,paved but no boat launching available 31 Orchard Beach 7-S West of 1530 50'platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline;tree Place growth and topography limits vehicular access 32 Highwood Lane 7-S 4156/4167 20'platted alley right-of-way to shoreline;steep slope Extension Highwood Rd to shoreline,undeveloped 33 Highwood Road 7-S 4051/4075 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not Alley developed 34 Corral Road 17-N 1785/1825 20'platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking Extension Concordia access 35 Eagerness Point 18-N Across from Accretions to the 40'originally platted road in the plat Accretions 1965/1985 of"Eagerness"; title registrations by most abutting Eagerness Pt owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no Rd longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no public access remaining Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Swimming 60' wide platted road ("Carman St") used as a City Casco Pt Rd Beach swimming beach 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60'wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle-undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy 20-S 3486/3508 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Place) shoreline east of Ivy Place-steep,used for drainage 39 "Spring Street" 20-S 2600/2618 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Casco Pt Rd Road to shoreline along south side of plat of"Kaster Cove"-undeveloped,walking access only 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Carman/ 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to 3555 shoreline,fishing dock Frederick 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Swimming 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Lydiard Rd Beach shoreline,used as a City swimming beach Big Island A N. End of "Lawn 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Avenue" Island Park B E. end of "Tooisit 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Avenue" Island Park-slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted r'dway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable gravel road for emergency&service vehicle access D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+/-wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, Morse Island Park City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 19 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Use k Section Address#'s E "Meadow Lane East 23-S 280/290 20' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Extended" Morse Island Park-steep slope makes use difficult F "Meta-Comet 23-S 340 33'wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Avenue South" Park and Lot 3,Morse Island Park 2nd Addition G "Massasoit Avenue 23-S 440/450 33'wide platted roadway between Lot 1,Morse Island West End" Park and Lot 1,Strivers subdivision of Lot E,Morse Island Park-steep slope • H "Meadow Lane 23-S 450/460 16'platted alley between Lots 5 and 6,Morse Island Alley" Park-drivable for emergency and service vehicles I "Pleasant View 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Street" Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3,Island Pointe TRANSIT Orono is categorized as a Transit Market Area IV. Transit Market Area IV has lower concentrations of population and employment and a higher rate of auto ownership. It is primarily composed of Suburban Edge and Emerging Suburban Edge communities. This market can support peak-period express bus services if a sufficient concentration of commuters likely to use transit service is located along a corridor. The low-density development and suburban form of development presents challenges to fixed-route transit. General public dial-a-ride services are appropriate in Market Area IV. The three primary routes serving Orono are Express Route 645 and 677, which provide express service to downtown from the Mound, Navarre and Wayzata commercial areas along County Road 15, and Express Route 674 which provides similar express service to western and central Orono,Long Lake and Wayzata. The TPP's Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Orono in the Current Revenue Scenario. (See Map 4A-7).To expand the reach of these fixed routes, the City will promote dial a ride services throughout the city. The Transportation Policy Plan discusses the expansion of Transit Advantages,though none are expressly identified within Orono boundaries. Given the limited right of way and the growing congestion of County Road 15 through Navarre, improvements and programs to expand Transit Advantage in the area should be closely considered. FREIGHT Freight transportation in Orono is primarily served by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail line parallel to US 12. There are no freight facilities within Orono. The BNSF rail line does not cross any roadways within the City. There are no large freight traffic generators within the City.Most truck and rail traffic is passing through Orono on trips to, from, and through the Twin Cities. Heavy truck traffic is for the most part constrained to roads under Hennepin County and State Jurisdiction. (See Map 4A-8) The development of the lake areas in Orono as seasonal recreational in the late 1800s early 1900's established many of the transportation patterns found throughout the community. In the lake areas, this pattern led to roads that are substandard to today's standards. Local residential roads are not designed for heavy freight movement. As the City expands its maintenance program, improvements to turning radii, width, and stormwater retention are considered. There are no known locations where truck access is not available. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 20 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan All local city roads are constructed to a 7 ton standard, though weight restricted to 4 ton in the spring months to protect the longevity of the road structure. AVIATION Orono is not in an influence area of a regional airport and is therefore not subject to associated land use restrictions. Airspace protection should be included in local codes/ordinances to control height of structures. There are currently no existing or planned aviation facilities within the City of Orono. However, the City is responsible for airspace protection in order to reduce hazards to air travel within the region. Given the distance to the nearest airports, there are no radio beacons or other air navigation aids located in off-airport locations in Orono. Any person or organization who intends to sponsor the construction or alteration of a structure affecting navigable airspace as defined in Federal Regulation Title 14; Part 77 needs to inform the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) of the project. This notification is accomplished through the completion and submittal to FAA of Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. In Orono, this requirement applies to any construction or alteration exceeding 200 feet above ground level. The City's zoning code allows a maximum structure height of 30 feet; therefore it is unlikely that any structures in the City will require FAA notification. There are no seaplane bases located within the City. There are currently no heliports in Orono nor any known plans to construct one. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. The existing level of seaplane operation is satisfactory to Orono. The City will support the LMCD in their monitoring of seaplane operation and in any reasonable changes in regulations necessary to prevent seaplane conflict with the primary boating use of the lake. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section of the Plan provides the goals objectives and strategies that can help city officials implement the Transportation Plan and make wise long-term decisions. Goals and Objectives The following table 4A-10 displays the goals and objectives of the Orono Transportation Plan.The goals listed below represent the City's overall vision for transportation over the next 20 years. The objectives listed below provide guidance that the City can use to reach the transportation goals. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 21 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ... Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives "{ Goals Objective 1.Facilitate efficient movement of 1.1. Regularly assess transportation maintenance needs and include people within and through the City roadway, trail pavement, and other transportation infrastructure maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan. 1.2 Efficiently preserve and maintain the City's transportation system in a state of good repair. 1.3. Provide safe and efficient routes for emergency and public safety vehicles. 1.4.Coordinate with appropriate jurisdiction(MnDOT,Hennepin County) to provide adequate capacity to relieve congestion. 1.5.Encourage sound access management. 1.6 Encourage, with other government agencies, the expansion of multi- modal and transit services in the city to support resident and business transportation needs 2. Facilitate efficient movements 2.1. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions(BNSF,MnDOT,Hennepin of goods within and through the county)to ensure the safe and efficient flow of Freight through the city of City Orono 3. Provide a transportation system 3.1. Coordinate transportation system investments with the Orono Land that is integrated with land use and Use Plan. development 3.2. Design, construct, and maintain roadways that fit the character of the adjacent land use 3.3. Require all new (private or public) residential streets be designed to City standards. 4. Improve transportation safety 4.1.Implement safety improvements to address high crash locations for all users and modes of 4.2. Proactively address bicycle and pedestrian safety concerns along transportation roadways and at crossings. 4.3.Bring sidewalks,trails,and intersections into compliance with ADA. 4.4. Support traffic calming and design to minimize speed on minor City collectors and local roadways. 5. Develop a safe and convenient 5.1. Invest in multi-modal transportation solutions including bicycle and multimodal transportation system pedestrian infrastructure. 5.2. Preserve and acquire adequate right of way for sidewalk and trail construction. 6. Conserve and enhance 6.1. Incorporate storm water Best Management Practices into all environmental resources transportation construction and maintenance projects. 6.2. Incorporate natural feature preservation into road construction project as practical. 6.3 Incorporate Best Management practices for natural resources within the city rights of Way General Transportation Policies 1. Commuter and general arterial traffic must be directed away from Lake Minnetonka. The sensitive environment of Lake Minnetonka, and the property rights of the riparian landowners, are being damaged by continued reliance on this outmoded roadway location. 2. Orono will actively promote use of the Ring Route and Highway 12 to provide viable efficient alternatives to continued over-use of County Road 15. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 22 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 3. Existing collector and arterial roadways will be upgraded as necessary in a manner that does not encourage additional commercial traffic or through commuter traffic on any of the City's primary north-south collector roads. These roads,specifically Orono Orchard Road,Brown Road, Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road,are primarily located in the rural area and serve a dual function both as collectors and as local streets. Discouraging expansion of their use by non- local traffic will help to preserve the rural character of the area while enhancing safety. 4. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. 5. It is the city's intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography,water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions,the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. 6. As always, both public and private property rights will be considered. To this end,the City will be guided thusly: a The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. b. The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 7. Orono will consider conversions of private roads to public roads as requested on a case by case basis. The factors considered in evaluating a proposal may include: a. The condition of the street. The condition of the street is consistent with city standards. b. Affected property owners. The desire of the affected property owners. The city does not intend to acquire maintenance responsibility for private roads unless requested by a majority of affected property owners, or c. Safety. If the condition of the road restricts access to the parcels by emergency vehicles, the City may affect the improvements. d. Ownership. Provision of Right of way or an easement Urban Transportation Policies 1. Local streets in the urban area will be owned and maintained by the City. 2. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. 3. Urban streets will be constructed to urban design standards. 4. Curb cuts and driveway locations will be limited for traffic safety. 5. On-street parking will be strictly limited.All urban development must provide adequate on- site parking facilities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 23 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 6. The City will pursue additional pedestrian and bike-hike trail facilities. 7. The City will promote improved mass transportation services for urban neighborhoods, including park and rides. Orono encourages improved bus scheduling and improved service, especially at off-peak hours. Rural Transportation Policies 1. Public streets in the rural area will be primarily limited to the existing collector and arterial grid system. 2. The Ring Route concept utilizes as much as possible the existing rural highway system. 3. The City of Orono will encourage all necessary road system improvements required to accommodate and to facilitate through traffic on the Ring Route. 4. Rural residential developments will utilize private road feeders to supplement the existing public road grid. 5. Private rural roadways will be constructed to rural design standards. 6. The City will guarantee reasonable maintenance levels and public access on all private roads. 7. Driveway locations and rural street or private road intersections will be limited for traffic safety. 8. Rural trails are an integral part of the total alternate transportation system. 9. Mass transportation services for rural Orono are not economical, hence the City will promote the use of Park and Ride locations where local service is not feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 24 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Transportation Plans i ,,Y ' I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 gl� y+. a 3 �, `%'r.'a a �' 'i , a'ri`a`,. !. ilt? ;,. - .. .` �, ?°� f � ss, Policy or Plan Description Adopted Traffic Management Provides a systematic process for the City to 14 December 2015 Plan address traffic concerns from residents through a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management techniques Snow and Ice Policy Established the city's response to snow and ice events Under Review that impact the cities roadways. Setting policies for snow and ice management involves balancing the following priorities: public safety, personnel safety, environmental stewardship,cost and Adaptability. Pavement Establishes the standards and priorities for Maintaining 27 October 2014 Management Plan the city's roads over a ten year time period. Further it identifies the annual Operating budget needs for pavement maintenance. Americans with The plan guides the Cities policies and practices with 13 November 2017 Disabilities Act respect to maximizing accessibility and use of city (ADA) Transition facilities by individuals with disabilities. Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 25 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Appendix 4A-A. TAZ Data 2010 2020 2030 2.040_ TAZ Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp 920 38 12 3.17 6 48 19 2.526 8 60 24 2.500 8 57 24 2.375 8 921 66 24 2.75 215 135 53 2.547 208 307 125 2.456 208 529 221 2.394 201 922 179 58 3.09 120 240 94 2.553 187 315 129 2.442 191 319 133 2.398 190 923 300 118 2.54 247 357 144 2.479 285 381 158 2.411 275 406 169 2.402 249 924 101 28 3.61 14 88 33 2.667 23 89 34 2.618 23 89 34 2.618 21 925 33 14 2.36 3 45 18 2.500 2 52 21 2.476 2 60 25 2.400 2 926 447_ 1.56 2.87 190 457 185 2.470 77 465 193 2.409 73 473 197 2.401 66 927 251 93 2.70 9 279 113 2.469 41 300 124 2.419 40 329 137 2.401 38 928 266 98 2.71 16 261 107 2.439 54 280 117 2.393 52 301 128 2.352 49 929 204 77 2.65 0 234 88 2.659 1 276 106 2.604 1 320 124 2.581 1 930 387 123 3.15 11 366 138 2.652 28 400 153 2.614 27 417 162 2.574 26 931 640 224 2.86 51 655 246 2.663 72 698 267 2.614 69 727 282 2.578 66 932 345 124 2.78 11 349 131 2.664 20 346 132 2.621 19 343 133 2.579 18 933 92 34 2.71 2 98 36 2.722 1 100 38 2.632 2 101 39 2.590 2 953 1969 765 2.57 127 2125 825 2.576 101 2177 864 2.520 102 2248 904 2.487 96 954 565 200 2.83 92 611 230 2.657 67 729 278 2.622 70 858 332 2.584 70 955 220 85 2.59 35 226 93 2.430 9 241 101 2.386 18 257 109 2.358 26 956 297 126 2.36 149 315 129 2.442 176 312 133 2.346 197 311 139 2.237 206 957 691 294 2.35 188 766 321 2.386 219 770 335 2.299 217 776 348 2.230 210 958 328 167 1.96 76 431 192 2.245 119 487 220 2.214 185 562 252 2.230 256 971 18 6 3.00 0 13 6 2.167 0 15 6 2.500 0 17 7 2.429 0 7437 2826 408 8099 3201 1698 8800 3558 1779 9500 3899 1801 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 26 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Appendix 4A-A. TAZ Data 2010 2020 2030 2040 TAZ Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp 920 38 12 3.17 6 48 19 2.526 8 60 24 2.500 8 57 24 2.375 8 921 66 24 2.75 215 135 53 2.547 208 307 125 2.456 208 529 221 2.394 201 922 179 58 3.09 120 240 94 2.553 187 315 129 2.442 191 319 133 2.398 190 923 300 118 2.54 247 357 144 2.479 285 381 158 2.411 275 406 169 2.402 249 924 101 28 3.61 14 88 33 2.667 23 89 34 2.618 23 89 34 2.618 21 925 33 14 2.36 3 45 18 2.500 2 52 21 2.476 2 60 25 2.400 2 926 447 156 2.87 190 457 185 2.470 77 465 193 2.409 73 473 197 2.401 66 927 251 93 2.70 9 279 113 2.469 41 300 124 2.419 40 329 137 2.401 38 928 266 98 2.71 16 261 107 2.439 54 280 117 2.393 52 301 128 2.352 49 929 204 77 2.65 0 234 88 2.659 1 276 106 2.604 1 320 124 2.581 1 930 387 123 3.15 11 366 138 2.652 28 400 153 2.614 27 417 162 2.574 26 931 640 224 2.86 51 655 246 2.663 72 698 267 2.614 69 727 282 2.578 66 932 345 124 2.78 11 349 131 2.664 20 346 132 2.621 19 343 133 2.579 18 933 92 34 2.71 2 98 36 2.722 1 100 38 2.632 2 101 39 2.590 2 953 1969 765 2.57 127 2125 825 2.576 101 2177 864 2.520 102 2248 904 2.487 96 954 565 200 2.83 92 611 230 2.657 67 729 278 2.622 70 858 332 2.584 70 955 220 85 2.59 35 226 93 2.430 9 241 101 2.386 18 257 109 2.358 26 956 297 126 2.36 149 315 129 2.442 176 312 133 2.346 197 311 139 2.237 206 957 691 294 2.35 188 766 321 2.386 219 770 335 2.299 217 776 348 2.230 210 958 328 167 1.96 76 431 192 2.245 119 487 220 2.214 185 562 252 2.230 256 971 18 6 3.00 0 13 6 2.167 0 15 6 2.500 0 17 7 2.429 0 7437 2826 408 8099 3201 1698 8800 3558 1779 9500 3899 1801 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 26 cob LTON ® 11—mENK Functional Novem ber 2018 Roadway Func • - Existing a "::' tii:.,' !I a0111111111.021) a °.., . ,,,, .....1..-••-• -.. ',..4.i. - 6„) ' ; ''''''''' ' a .. b . ..71:,. ..9.....4 vii Comprehensive Plan '' - ..:,....c...._.7...-•'9 7 ,... ; ., ,_,. re 2040 ComP .. I Q., i 41.,' 01,'' .2,....1.: „%..f, '', .,, ,.'„, ., sPring'.4" .. 'Lithard ille, '' re ,„,,,- 7, , N ,„ . Lake "C„. ..1 AveiN Z. ,...,,,I.,9.. ..-:,,-:.1 r''''S.,"-) z : 4- Orono,M L8th I. 0 ,Acker ,2 , ., Classification is ...,_•.-.7.--7::, ,,,,! z._•••1—"" G., Lake -a-- - ' _ , :1', , .,, u —c2N '`411u-stio'' B .-3--",-. '.,: L01131,„„,,,, r. , . \r ,---) C:3g ,,,,,,,Ati,•,',„. ,::°..,,.' :'''' s 6,.. .,,,,,,,,,,,,R.,,;,ea,,I,People.4 ,u1,1.e3.,a1 Solutions. _ Laf'ei.......,L .:..: ' •'1.'7' 0 11 I, .•-7-,',..,''''' c."\i • ,, Turn.r Rc'd 1 ''Cia68e".1?:;:12'' .4,8 IKelk"YloPL-k.4.1 Ilire!ils11:‘ 4 ,,,;,,..., :.. ir41 'C'<o,,9,k. R/604.;..:.!,:..- -:- ":' 7,, 1 Drake Dr I lidit *1, 1 ) , .,,,__i-,, „::,..,:, cr..!, lel 'D'r2. r/1:3:,? Pc7I,q 1.'-' ,,i '1'!'.. .-•• -'"6...,E ..-: Hifor,kv k'k• ,71 -") ' ,2 g g,_f_____ _____:--„ii liGra ...-1-1i'l ) . F7,_ . ...... way„ta Blvd VV, 111b. to ..... .., ,rei IIIIIIIIIII arP47.244;iptif.,,,Joh,Blvd E ir \S--1 L. ',q1L.42411, 111 Lak! 7 1 ,ii . , „. 1-7 .,, . .. ..c, - ,,b,,.„,,,„0, ,1 , 1L- -..r.—...„.. . _ ... --- o . It -,,, all c' .4.'-iic":",r`'.,''.•'" "--4.'"'"-a.'-'0".....,...Ak';''.9.5 •••' ("1 -- si mo line Road oct /:6 ---' )' I. a'.;4241 - ',.., ''''''. frlt., -.,.'':'''.:;::''',f'-';'"''3':''It'YT.-' "N ' --. I 1 c:i"'9-Y* cl.'-' -'''''''' ' 2.'"'' - 1ileV:::.':',;.;';',i;:'‘':':':';'':'!''''':'''C::::':::' 1 C.' 1 ,..t .....\ r'it [ 110 19 i„.,'''''''''''..;•';,i,s'2 ) -r--S a'; . • . - 0.0.ti.,'" 1 ."41-•1'45 ;-"...t.;"7,,,,f..0.,,••• ''',-'•f: ;rt, '.." "'"-7--'' •' - - ' - '"" . '."'" LL ,'„.•:.,,,,'.•,,•61;, ......./- ,, ?..............s.--;,- f:.'4.'""t4'.?".'.'•'"" 1- ••'. ' leke.', :".,.,,.:,..,:, ,„,,,, I -,,,i,:z.,,,;=::::1...:...,,,.:*., 2:9 ir 1 ' "71-lk' - ' ' :---- 4,41.,„:' ';,,4";`44i.::. i '*t ---.'' ' '''''''':''''''';',..•'''''''''''''',' 60 ',:-., ' 7-1. *. -,,(' '., .., , :....]........,:, -........0,i,,ic-iii... • . ,,,, .;...,..;7:',...,:....-i3,....;;T.'„,),,,!:, ; -1 =;.:., :::..,:,,, ::., :.,.w...i.t.h.,..' k ''"-'"''.'-'filij•E'X'"114‘.4.1••.'":'•-lp .'-'..,A.ferh-.±. - ''',--1;.,. . -.'"-,;7' ,..':',„,..:...-':,.... ;-3.-kg4-4/NR. Rote 0- ; '..',.. ....7...t.e.;..'," ' I •-...i'-'.'',••...-j,"''' ''• ''''-'- ' -"' - . - i it.••91k :. , ., .._ r•:, i — - -, ' S r ' 2''''''' g 1 .".!It?1,12itnI'' ."L ..'ppit°"11;kii:To , -- ; Rood\'l'\ County Rood _ 7, '' -' „,',,,,,.;',',„,-;''''- , :- ----- , i „-: di;',.?,-,,-.4L,'-,' -.. „ ..,,^,,,,,‘,%",,i1„,,,,,i;iO3-'1,"'-ilv--":..f.'4.- :„ r,„,„,...1 1111. „,, .Brooch ,04041."C'' .:,. ''''''.-:'1'1 t '.. ..: , ar'... >. :'....:'1. :3 'g?.,r< Z'',.':.,r::,','":':'?'tr'' Min ne'tonka taw,. 4004,1 ..,....., 0 , -2 '' .. ...-. ,..;.-..v.::`'..•••'.4"."•,;",...' ?:•.,"''-l'''4.•.-411;"*"'.37 ' ' '''''-'''-`;-'''''-::-'''•'. '...: •.2 Kalil Ilaar. V mi '',:',''''' •,.$.i.,.1 1 s .4"-,..-1 l;'"":".•Z;-:".1•"11.''''''''''1".".'''''''' 1 5'' '." .-..., . .. ;'-i'4.1kem,„nka--•.„:"....;";: :,.:.."'44:',:%::,,;.,„..,»'' ,4•911 .., . ...' -tion g ,.. ca A' g.„aYfi'ld Rc'd E .r.,,,,i...4:4:r.,''iti;i7t1:t,.. '.7;','" .,. I ' .. ''. CryOtal . .... ...,.;...'''..:777i'.W :4."*. ,t'-'1.;;TI.":',..,2'...$4:;,;'''''Ir31'717,: '14;14:24'4:111'12-7.1t::'''''' 4t Functional Classification A Minor r 7:2, f::: g 'I , ,"„'..., ,1 ,. .Q..i.,i.,,i:.> '''''"7.' ' ..• '' A6...-' , ..,,.„,,-.,..:.iiL " , ,,,:..::9,,,,„ P d E ..f.",,...' Ili ii-ii#I\%::''' '1''''likrrn ' ; Air .1: ..- , '.1 ''' `.';'7 ,..' -^-''''''''', 2'• ..":, ',,„.,* Minor er ...' Major Collector .....' r Expander Iil G.r„e Fa ra,Rc'' IF * Ilp 1%,, ,. ,;,.,..i....,.,...„,..,........ „.,..,„.,4.'„ .,,. '-•''' '''::- '. ',,:-.•,,•,,,,,,,,,,,,'"'"'":':kiii.,./..;.!:."4"ab"!?:::%1 A Minor . or Collector x aon min C u . io „f. ,,,.,.,,.„,,,,ng.:„ ....„4:g,krt.g,'.;g.?g "'f, iafayette N ;..!.,i.-.,:,... ' ,,,,.., ,',..":,'"irlo.. .ds..".;;-,'F,:k•54-'...t-4,41.,,,,,,,...*- — , c.;,. ; :,;.,''.'-' 'I;'irr:fi ''''''"":''.'"''' ..'.."-; .,...,,,N4F:.,..„..- .,....,,,V,4,-,',11.2f:- " - .7i:"..;',":4". ..,,..1:". •,,,'"':-C,-.4',.:: .......:... 7, ',...,'•`..i.,,,,....',":;;•"'".,-; :1;•`,,Iiita.:„'`,.'•''.•' c: "le."'" ''''"".,,pa..y• ',:,.. ,,. .., ,.7477.7.2, ,L./ , ...177 ir•.!-= • ‘,"4..i''''' .'.•••''' ' , :::4,,,,ir...„4„;;;*•., .,'4..,.. ' .INII":444::::','" (74.,4 Arteriale v —Otherconnec Arterialto . • , .. • . , .. . ....„,,..,4, 4A-1 -., • ma P !,: -'„" lb g wilk shore,,,:.iiiieviir , ...... ..k. •-•"?'":1).T"Ik ''' .'.....'4" . :-, ''''-'..'''. rinciPaiReli 7,..r.p1,\..,....„,j..‘ W e% ''''":., 4"'''`,747.;;:; ' '.,11-:' ' ' Carrnan'3 .•' 2A. ' .. - -;•":,,,',,:,..,,,g!...,:io''',,,,''k,77,,g.7;4g.-e.i4t,L..;.;31!" g C .""'_.L- '! Wief, ;' 5....,,„,,:,,,,,,,,,,,...i.4. ' s::;..,..1. ' ''...-` coeht'"i, ,,,,.:„., 1,...,--V fl.-. t , r . 71 ,'-,.. .. , A'''''"'"':-.•''''''''''":"'- 11i ' .-...,..,.:.,'...',-,L;;W:T."..„..,.:-..-',:, ....;/..°...k'''' ' '*' ;' ' ' E Legend '' Lakes&Ponds —4b " -'.•77 ....) . • -',-;',"iif-ii,T,A,4p4"04,-,,,„TiN,s,,,,,t, ,,,,,,,,,,,,-..„,,,-.--.p,,,_ ' _,,_ - i - ,,,. .' rele/Z4'14 -'''' '' ' '' ' '' '' 7, , ...•7 City Limits W446.........-',. .'°•-. %'''.1,--.'Zit',.%.".'".1...,•.'-.,•;,,-...• .;:c,•!4"f"":""• • t s1,4%.'14 . g Shear's 2 •:..r• woo,••''.,. ;'',"'„'' ..." "."" _...: .. , 1 2040 MUSA 3.500 1 0 Feet Council,City of Oorgn79' .... , ---. r„:fleet- County.Mn s• Sou Hennepin ., 2040 Comprehensive Plan Existing Roadway Jurisdiction BOLTON �' %( K � Orono,MN November 2018 & MEN K • f� estlo�� Real People.Real Solutions. -1i3rk: Turner Road v dt!<r Sia.._ �� CI- ' N &o �z `���" n • ��++ ---"-'•7 .�. ...�..�-. m t ltt1 Tr90 / Drake Dr T a Nc+, � u ,.. ° Poad 4�e H I o mir6:'� W" `rz:,' .� Yake 3 Lane a SPrin �2` �L "'. �9"„i-'J '";' :x pue N Classes.,,. E. ..' .. r 112 m Kelley.pkaY Ld4n.. r*"h.. �.r'm c I I F r oaa � :_ ,m 111111117114 ,^ya L,aYCe���.' � o� r=� pvea m c P .'�. K yl'n r � 47,4e.,';',:,!!,.1.'54'7:,' po0e. T .. ,., •1 !.. Bth AveN.,,,,;c4. yP�eN t > ce rc ° c 5� v� pa ;,„, Moline Road ?2' d m Orcha: �� O� 2 u J6'7,!::::::::* ST"a �� II a m e all ve tl4n 1 4th Ave N r w, wnROd a o111111111gr• �/ ' n9 Lad03rd,Avet s. 110484- Vy , N.-J.146. r R°a �°' ` ' • TTk.. r/'„26 19' Ba,..,... y�tla o 146 ..� Wayzata,.. h ,°wo.E - m Rod rn c - , ittPar HiAjhway z? aj � _..yv, � .. e<:"lt ,1..,. '� ° . ,: �' ,„.,r1,14,:;., � f Wayzata Blvd E -�• y -�-410 ubba t=.. —15 i _.r.��m Lak�� Painter Road ( m� - Xy Foz St m t ©fiv �� �' . '4 W Branch Road County Road 151 tY I .e�m \ aur2h"" : at ,.sxae Wayzata Ann ° r '::yenagat ; gay` ° &♦X v,x a A' �1 "�,. MaxX� ',4",4'4' w ut�' . .�^a-r' ``�'" �r� ,� �a`` � . 1 French 1 t Sunnyfleld Road E "r" l'.''''''' tf;i,. ro .84 Math ti. *.+` ",=r*.,. ,r :Tgr * a a :,•,y 1�1 m q -n kms,r''•^ '� _`,�. € ashore Or ' 1 " .w? hu.:.':'..,..,.'''''.,it.,-""`r r. <.. , n Bay * i 51 Ir► y ;rr II I 2 r,c , Game Farm RoadE o _+ Po .yT &y „ I D - t �„f`. '% '. ,,r _,) .u"sm. Y,-,..,,i",..,-,7•,,,.--,"----;„, �'.„- _irnri 1 ° ":''r t c • /��;���, � 3• -_' &;` 'esti is ;,ate ••••,......-- , 15� a , ? 11. • ,> " -2i,,,,,—,..,54‘,, �� o Lake > .,„..4.,1. .+,$";"'",,.z°'z <:I` ..' Bay Point r w*•4°^ 3„.„,,,,,,,4,.,,A.,10..•.,,,...•';.4„. ,*, Aaaii- n , .. ` - Y ��, -Y innetonka L�nod Blvd E a� :,..,,..•,,,,-- .0,-,.,--.., I �. ra aHzr" a 1 Ji 11 ' Shoreline Dr .,; g • L I "'� oAlba / t► °°�� ��1ti, : ., .,.,,,,,i,...,,, ,,,,_,.., ,,,. , 1 ac" r < tl ry ,.". 3� 'r �' 9 ..5�`� n wY V Y ° 0 44011111 ��)lel :1• l rj �' (,r ^a *. : }� a; ,x..- ';, •+ r1.Rut1er19e�Roatl s Y .- �„, y-„"BA '*., ,,°Y, I L k renRoatlr �r Day Ply c,Ave Legend e 4z , •s ♦ Ii:I zx Per-a a veall ice■ tt °o=. a,;♦ ♦ Jurisdictional Class ifications o "x _ r: city umlts lakes s ponds �� ` c` st7ir�l", " " �: ai -1' ,a*� '"°`♦ "■" MnDOT Municipal Street ti � gay Bay ans :I m,1,',Y'� `'Ie a .,; � zoao Musa -✓`,-�- Rivers s straams ♦ � .,� yr +1 I y � i r. Hennepin County Private Road m � z a t.1x:!/ `'T � I9.� .. r � vxr.aa'..*i :Ta x"Ia�a"„ � i• n 0 3,500 r , � � . ,.�._.,. ., • `, i Feet n , ,. # tT ` Source.Met.Council City or Orono, Fr.``^ ;Point 1 ''T„`.prt°;.�°+' r rr' Hennepin County,MnDOT d' Map 4A-2 t. N.."' v* .,: "_" °`x;" nT inn Wd 2 1 r. ;, ...-...•:".•":".,:'," �,�� ..,..,ai',, w .. , ;<.� � x 5 'raw 'Ci °1\1(- ''' n BOLTON 2040 Comprehensive Plan Traffic Analysis Zones I & MEN K { Orono,MN /a'1 November 2018 '�'tKesiioA�: Real People.Real Solutions. Turner Road m ...'S= � Gajke _ � ,•+_ ,.924; c 7C7�2Mh' ,1 - a P,�. - - 925 04 CI P.rL:a ry,key, Z 6 •• _ °1 m z w AvoN 10‘11 d 934 0 920 t Ave N 11 Drake Dr ;w- o 6th Ave N ", t*r`" xr 1.2' '1 921 . p► Rod 1003 y °, 937 ° �� _ � a '� Y !�""# ° 933 922 Dldkey ■ � 10.10 6; ` Gbh *.:. pveN \ Giessen a �L 1-----;":41,7:1•71,7-1I440 ,'...' ff. �€.r,9 »r :1-1:.,;":!,!„.. v ffi-. >_ • Qr'�a0(. ° -... roJ` :�M.y ... 11, Ke 22' 923 m (d`'h 40 ,m^` ° .",_.-.,02 1001 ` w 311111,P \Z -..Wayzata�Blvd�i.... '•. f { �: m t Ave N Avec Y .Y#. 936 J'i aterto •� .`° '♦ ` �,..1 �.*.z,.' 6 ° i.� i Lpl > GJ Wn z "' � ��' � 5'6' .-m • 935 a �� L. �d, A v IJ Orchargr �� °a c 'o tT � athAveN ._ * m -- ,g Grand Ave Lo <o o y t. u .. "';7"" r "r Moline Road 931 °..929kap., r�, .. ''91-.3‘. 8 latre Rlgga 3 t 1 000 ,3 -} _rgAveN " sa 932 0 Dr `_`* .^ ',..i..'.."::::'1::. *.,.,' Aa 140 � F` ,�11ey.' ti . . ,� y�qa928 ,�a,t 11°;; ' - ,, ' ' ' a 996CY9930 R `' 972�(Pie. w. 974 " ,: ��� '; ° ^ ebbs „Shoreline Dr i s " 'fRtc Hata g G)0 Highway`2•E o y i o 952. ��, 1 m d PainterR�d .. . _ Fox STS � � � � aveY Ln 'Op o'.� • Lake'•��E QOD p yj r ii. °4 :03, •..� ", 3y°,a Ot C 1, :zi w. S(, 975 g 9 aat�BlVd n W Branch Road County.Road 151..: ktr'y „o °^" _,y ° ;:'!•',55 �,.„•, '°* F rn a ��a' ' rq +z':., v~ : 4. - S '-` e^a B/..Ro�W"(F°� ^`,xq * 4.0-,...,;..,',;„,..,;,.....,4;:,,,,,,,- Y+t8z ani Id NortEr': o .;, °I,",. r- cTahqk78r 1 11 ' , * ,,A"* �'.,4 - Rrm41. ? a1:at ' ,-3t „, w,,,'hz .r Al r IN,-^z;"x, .--,-..,-„,-;,,,,d,./.,:..: ; 941 ,� °;, a '*=t°+„ French : ° l;'" F`t .' :.i 97_1 " �a,m x 1 °:', , k = D b"?{$t. 4" 3 Old nR "I'A�... • :. ashore or ' ,•..-o *i,, r+t,-yam r:A :.tt,,. t ,y' . m »# Tam' ; o Sunnyfield Road E 3 u, y "* - i ;fiL�xr41 .1.$,Z.*:, *+"t„ '^ . ''.4.'''..:' '..'i4.,..-.1H0 T- * ' r: ..;^. o�at:;e* ^. Qh his t - � » _ J i ,� �" �� x �v �`, '"`P t c:"ta"L"4 ♦a 3=r'� yt.' ' �' a � '� f`` °" 953 A ° �� L .� � m o . , ,, x ,� k 1 • ',d 976 "® gin. 993 dE .m ; rr'„°** 1� a ='`` :."{` tt ;954 ^•" �Y,, •�` ,: � ,;, :::(7....:4:',4:i.,\ 'L�n »!;, V ®11 GametFarm Roa „.S: (/j( x" L :. ,.-: r ,!1.t.,',",*,;'„;''.:',.. A c •`r r.r ` z C P o xb a ,*.F1-.c - B� < o ..Wm-r d+s•`rc 'wT� y. .r»„:^ :z:. * `_ = -� 1 >tir ”" ;,U * ,.w * -"F �e Bei »s .,.: * � ":.m., a„�r;QAa sC..k+. ° * .� ru'r?tc` `" ::;11''''''';':: 1.:1:::':::'::'::" ..:''''': : 't "� �.. >#I�a., Yie . :..w � *{d,*:, �,.:aT {,;- 4 o -.. 'nx,w,�rt 'Oa l •', ,,;� �, .__ r* w°, 1 � �Rs Sv» ry,� d, ���� q o' La"7te _ a`" ^u,„..t ""a Moo>, +. ^*4 .% 'RaY ... rTa ri. 'a*'.tx3c. ?x,'"`'',4 1 ».:"r =;.:'^ - ba •--.1w.4111i °.:; .'",!i7,1".,,-.:...1:••-•.,',.; Q J m :+.„ S,. = V z p. • , wrt Y? X97:0 - Minnetonka "m,''t h i `. ,,s�.',.. �� Narr/3oh .: Y' �" "`i.;4 e + Ott.; '''''''''''::ii':: ''‘ :' ;*;� :t" E.-'ta �" +demi .o , .»-•pr g ttt:.';:rs.r4,, ';.,z:. t .� �-. S' W ! r J ■ @'', ,^ E 951',;w. �»� ' `4`' S oto Road` Arcola V` "' .ems r a nLH g N ��� \��,�# �a. 992 ��� E 'Et*ii:4a O' c:, tog „'- :1 t1,"i '' 'aa ,zr. '. agv.,y —,Highland Ave :�' i • .-,_.,1—• Shoreline Dr hero m^ g¢, Rutled r/� v l` ` 949 Lynwood Blvd Ci � '_` W:Am'D No Me ORI ^n, t "Y"t n" n r r`'" "tr 'S' .=e Roadn 1.1.r o j1��1 :: S� v ..'.. � • � _..---,,,-.,•'-'T---,,,,.4.--, ,;-,61,....,;:No �.� A .t�etaYa a",c Io sr wr �-_ Ii ■: ka M+ •*11'l ' o�xG A � V�t ,•��T,�ri� d.---:= r� `'�"r¢d.°#s b �.�w*.. d >ty ��Azu re.Roatl iris c.Day PI'r^. • �i ''.-":":7:':...., 77.::::1-..........:-.9.,.5.7:::;„"..',.,:, Cync Ave 4 Bg P 'c �� 97 o tra ii � I 9,58 .%13,72":' w da,,*.: X * ' + ^'R"Ti s% n, r d � Lake Ave. �• � '.: Legend �y °oq� # ?' Traffic Analysis Zones `S .` 9 0 i "- a.ura9�: m 957 -9r. Ro ;"' " "' �'z""rr c`= a " *°`�' � - - Y • ° •- ¢* p° TAZ Boundary o •-• • City Limits "a- LakesBPonds SPrrnq *' w"° A **"" ., -.�• � - : ,� � { �amans 961 ..:.::,';:-......„,,,,r77:956 w •Lakevtevt #9.59 .5!`vt` `:.' ,. ' 1 tk";'"='s„" , ood R d tz,✓�St.°lL.'A.,,,,, 1----1 y zoao MusA Rivers a sveams °` .-+ o' ; µ TAZ ID o•s`a # 0 a' r3< or tt tl 0 3,500 �,If►o3xa-cr",^rv;+ •'w: o L a",=x "* Ta 969.„ Feet rr gla o- -* v; 0. ,r an°Road z z Source:Met Counc,city of O ono, yang � }ii Ro o ; M Ni 4A-3 Hennepin County,MnDOT * r, W°�k_1 9 68 car-ii „r 0No 2040 Comprehensive Plan Existing Traffic Volume&Crash Data BOLTON yA ' Orono,MN November 2018 & MEN K Real People.Real Solutions. 'U# is .Katona g l L'.; , 1 . Turner Road „„ 'Lake '� to a17 r'` S s 5 x� ,.S _ v { ` , `i� _"100 T -0",0"1 - ..E. .. _ .. '-14:',5''''''1"44i: a �r 20th AaefN 1 l�O 510• nth-Avon.'y -.-. �/ ® Drake Dr © ..., � 0 4000 O O m 45 (�•ssoo <<� q� ! ���„ 4•1*.,'�, ��,0 ,.,,/ `` O r K e� 2 O 6 O 6th Ave N ® „� F • x. r=^ O � Drckelo � ,,„.y 03 s �° O I ` � Q ; ©ADD 1 lasoo-OOQO����0 Q 5800 a !7 6 Sp it1© Lake„ `, N Lake 1, , �' any Nine ©O L ' m • ^po 1 ,�Cai� `� loo O ®1000 Q*.s -2°1 taa'..f - ,.:Q� x t .``Gy and z• �'� • O ,,, : ig c`. `'.-?10 '."1.'' t 0 DIS, � � Longi Cake a . (� �© 0a �l0 u" / c, _\� . �O© : �. :; ' 7400 ����©� Lake �T" =Rimy- y c J ©OAtli ©`p Ok :`",,:"tt�`*�, .'r/ •j a 8th Ave N 0 =-♦ �.0 6th Ave N n !'���0© o 2., ® O11 J, �0• © I©" 038 t O " 6©, .» dtht legitO U O Q C)70, i a>S 1 me) O r 4'3,90 .��oo ,w O ©1 O --1600®sso 84 l J 870 I k� , p . , 9 zt _ O 01eso p•r�ooQ Oo_0_' • ©♦© - - O(gear&ae _ LN -c,..... O w ..;., OJ Q, © -tie � O� , 0 .1050 26 O © a .,:,. ?ooy©O © O o ,0 O(®Q9.aD ��� OQ r"+ ® lei o Ai 9 1Q 9 N Arm Dr 850 Q s '� o-- o ". , .�15 IR9 ,ynt rhQQ yit�}j 1 cid 74000 a Paln�r oad© n _ '0 © `._="x. _,,,,e,-, ���V`'�1`tQ ®) �� .0� µ i o Bay ..,;y I,!e—. '.„ Q m�O�. o ` ,� A ;: , ` O sso O p loo0 0 w ("\nO© , O \\ g. O O n�,.'__.,_.''--W Branch Road\ . ,- ma,„ ^ I * _0 0 U 330 ©©©Ow© 0 \ Sfubb , o � , Browns o �©� x�x �ata 1 ®� '. v O North. ;., #4,, O oTane ei Bay k t Bay a I © _ N 'F ''fi4-. Maxwell 0 .O , "Lake n ;,rl : a o m _- © O a+ ' Bay' :':'.$4 n"c"Ir"' s. , af "",. x„ `. baso © Sunnyfleld Road E © 0„„„+, >prast _ o Marsh O r;' 4 7. i: .. ' , 101 O C\ t v , take. O ,. ..::..v...---,,...) ..„-„,-. ■ o , I ''t ,.a =:. .. ,kennings 1 Q O t, ',,:r.." ... .. 9,e x. -, r 1�-^"y ^^+„.”` - ; L E -lis x.4a:': .., .°T ,". <? ..: O 400xay.: 4300 1�Q0 ^^*t'P ; ? t - iit �_ Sxr`"°'..-,s.. ` % - .` 1 , g00 Q : x^zs -r Smith �aa^,vz. -s. ta^#✓`ay- a Dutch `_ ®� ©3o'•©�✓ c Ayyerm q.Q < .s Crystal {,. �' ` 5 fix. 1 a T„ O /��L Ponos z lc t 1 - ? Lake ....r•:^.h=... .... k::. • Mina a a I .,_. n O ©2!O i O .p ,. ,� � M � Traffic and Crash Informtion `-+!O 'Q = ii ,; 0,...,,,,,,,,,t4,,,,-::- i Average Annual Daily ::: t:: ;1:: Summary���`O �� OQ 13700 O5J'^ 07 0ltengr„ t 2014 QEffff/ w eO p $ ,. g iiiiiii„ls I� © ��EO© � , .:,� � `moi' a zolz Fatalaies 4 .' ""' Q Spr;nI:"' 1A �� ,� 'OM'''. x } Non-Motorized Crashes N200.0 11 Crashes ;a © i ^ City Limits Lakes 8 Ponds ,/� 9I 0 "`Cannan 5 , .w I �' o ( ) �o r. r' b / 2006-215 o �.. '^, lark: ©� .,:. - •Yr ( (2002015) v1 y Bay r1�' xti° i1 Y 1.� • Pedestrian �e 2040 MUSA -./1.r�-- Rivers 8 Streams : I 1 L .x, y ( Incapadtating Injury . r © . : !. I- _O db Bicycle • Fatal Injury °1 C. 0 3,500 Oo max. ♦ ©:, Feet i •, Po mato t r0,© tO Oj© E Source:Met.Council,City of Orono, Map 4A-4 tio1 , Hennepin County,MnDOT 1 — ©t �j0 IrA °�hd. .. t . .,, �` y Q 1pt Y& �j i7 ^�7�m��} \t 7 `�QND 2040 Comprehensive Plan Existing and ProjectedTraffic Volume BOLTON .011 y Orono,MN November 2018 B MENK '�kbsho'�k' Real People.Real Solutions. n'aH nd , t .4 -__--_-4-4800.7,.,,z.. Turner Road WaYZai e -tee«e a %so A ++�.�..�.� ❑ .� �. �` ..-"-%':'..•.', .� N1oan \AveN ',?oo' rz 2i'''';1'111 103 tt �d.�s-..�.��. ,v take lL 5,9 /vtl -- key §.. .6400' ._. .a d Y 41,-Av,H Drake Dr '.'"4 ,, w.1p'700 ° f12-46'1:502 400 4800 �1. 4800�z 6'y/q �, �4D0 F BODO + '' ''\\!b 19th Ave !Y;1 • w2300 2500 _ /' 350- 3 ( S._f keN `Ya 10110 6 6500 500 rv' \2� 0 f c 4200 6100 0 0 / °ad 1 ( 10000 0 11000`, 71 6300 2900 ., :3600 i ` 1300 N �= DiCkey o R 6300 ♦10o soo 7400 1100 6 azOD ;. `Lake S . 1500 14600 u 1800 N � 400 szno Lake z '"'�- Aging� ,u• � azoa 1 pve 11aoo 11 1000 as6en, o' ! nrrt =• • S � SSDO ' ..--. .....'"'"'"-112. Kelle Y ♦-....t a ♦ i S70 6 14200 0:^Y. aL000 La ,,,„,,e.° 600 = 0 2800 z 1900 5500��-7900`-•� X14000 -15900` '�,,, „ x,,F: c� a� „;:1„r m i oaa 'FA m .� 3950 3900 ♦ \+ z° e =° Daniela8 5100 1 •` ''. 8th AvefN veN 1 40,11i;z z Moline Road'c °'@ m v__L..... Grand Ave Orchard -•�� W ayta�� Or°'` , e O th Ave N " o i . ° 14 ci■ g's _•.:..` v zzo0 bODo 7°wnR,_. �( o rl c x23lpo �a n9 Wke Abe �., 3rtl,Ave R °1 301 n aso °atl S 870 2. I I � lg e� {1 T S 110 1900 1850 1700 .. * 9 rrw.o .-• a.F", z-«�'� 6$0 670 � � v ----- __.__���1� �13500� .�.. .47$0 "� _� r 4 °ary m... - _ 0 26 w 1430 y °" o.,,, .J--�.,� �. 000 5p0 . 0 56000 ‘I ''''''''''''''''' Ia ¢lji 6 x105 ,,,, 16 ,:A w x vi. . 9 , Parkes Hi :�s �a 4:4''''''''''''''''*('-'''' .sa:.c <v"„,., `_ sso 610^ '°. Gya o �® Sf, ay o♦ - o ^+ 3150 n 24o ubby 690 5r r c r 'w /1 w afa Blvd E v F \a 7.3000 y Blvd 0 240 1 J 690 J i 1135Shoreline Dr)J : 1U► ke ? G° Wa zata BI d Road ':4100 4� � 0 21000 ' Z $au ,ay L 4� a.* b '\.A/'e� D o ` 111 ,... o n st v Painter 22„950 I m Fox S °ya m y A"a'kLak '* ' ro P' c 4650laoo a 1a5 a 1000 t zaoo a ay t Ro e:Sr 5900 1600 A �. pm O. !y 1 °'e O< • t A „., r c -W Branch Road 2R`Count Road 151 •1200 200 kwY p .,,`�,�i 1 "3`' ��e bC -i�``"*„� °• la na ❑ a y 4650 1400 b'Fe z.', Ol`= rFerntla/e Road W ek¢F 1 *” r ,''''' n 1' ... `"^.mer R°ad O "a , 2750 l''.'7, a ,.,,reneger. ,6. � aay �i b" Z 550 td \� ,Ann � Maxwell. -A. S Lake 1 / �a.0,°h..,t S" ;z m °�/n0, ! A id,- ..,O °r-. o•m Bay Freeh �� -,..,„/";-.,:;,-,',P:'-'-'7'.:::',-.7*'-' v'.^ ;„ 1 ,2 (5<Ni"' s "'r, 1DI ROed/1, Sunnyfleld Road E {, FbreSf � `` ' � 16g00 '" o . :,.♦ .1 Leke... 1800` �///���`r�---•1450 .y 1 3 „.., � 17$ � �^°'� .a�. 00 } /22005000 y .�;^.l " �. Jo , 4650 (� � o Jennmg's 1 0 1r *s�° s12150-0 � .cr ^ rY rn • 1750'.'"' •.o• 0:... 756 500 1 :X"`' w;` • Y 200 •aeoo� a5oo \.•4100 a 550 5400 g50�.p,56110 p1 4100 1460D�'S`/n1t)i a"-.. °""^ y 1^'`r ,i,� `. 5-1 000 ♦ ?8$o Its soo 1100 ,r.....-.0,,,,:.,'"'''''''''''. 4600: isloo ga BWOIieks 1 si R d E F-x r. '�' 4800 `"° 700::^Ia1500 Y Point ¢ ;e.g �... ,` ° Game Fa nn Road /111600 � �' tr r „"- �`• ♦." •• � ji :"�:_ "•:: °"�` � - e noD 1wa *X000,-1o'1c d' 1. Went ". -,,., 'ay , )J r t4.-P,,.,44';',1.4.44,,, `'""a r v.,„,. 0 7 1's $ .. DdiicK' o =,.�/2•ari �o :.r.'-'''?.':7f a '4rm o Cryslat 8ofins�., �•3�= ;� *s," °°« J lake m ,.• BaY .Poin!; r.: axr .,, 1r „ A,,.. ._,`,'-� ;4°,;.. c .1 .. ,° .fin"- �.•.,. 'lei vn¢? =� zip ''"'+' ,'a ° 4 toe' 1250 9700 "C0 6bn a otl .�57.0 s •, •. „” "' • .;:°:�+ \*x Minnetonka , .y a. . Minnetonka Blvd 1 ti ^ �� rv�l 17�� 1 v e t a3oo 'B8y r �:x ! 14 1_ 1 o f ," ss r �n *f s• 8�1�0 ���1 1300.111000%I Ed9ewa�Q ' • .ryb1.1700-4go`��` ",.t -,,*.r Arcol�A600 1 f ° r. n,„1: � ,`m- �o' ,� • 148Q -1700„ •. .�..�. `LL -•yy', ' e Lynwood•Blvd i` 520 0 4900. p "� n y . „, " 1 '�..--.tHi hlandrAve 7� ,�� '� M-' 0 14000 11000 .W>Arm"'Dq�j 600 6300 lafaYeite 0°a°; °'" X 'Pain ) ° ��3000- o-h a 13300 7—Ti 5� X17 1aoo��'a kz r x "r7 a aL_ N " m .-t�r"�-J 17100 0000 *" 1 - -17600 .r $Yq 1 x • �- "' `� :+:' 4900 19600 2400 r3;� L s7oa 2700 F °'. • Forecasted Traffic Information Legend e 500 ! °6yh°Oyr 11600 * a , ,F Farb Average Annual Daily s F-,.. 9P °Otl,P 13100'1] 1«"x, • a TraKc tAADT) • 2040 o _ City Limns Lakes 8 Ponds .hlre,B�a a900sng� re i°d 15;Oy0 m •" !a"v , �°' a L � ,, ,1,r; /� #Ik## 2016 Current Volume ce g .� ��yo =B 1 Bad anrs ���000-i ; 7u. l ,'J o^7t"� f# 2015 2040 Forecast ((� 2040 MUSA .J\,- Rivers&Streams _495 9�0 'ki `" '.-+ ,`rsrs i�)s fi �4 r� , "" `11' ;d ROi? �f5';1'.", 'S-••-" Growth jar z q9 4.H .,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,i4.,,,,,,,,.:. • G� a -Y*:.+k R ."a 'ate • x `�' x p 0 3,500 °rr ♦ n •� r F' - iF /r Feet �,, a ♦ Caaut :+ ,' .h` •' , € Source:Met.Council,City of Orono, Ana �"1' k� ...rr;a., Point t • o yx.x - , not R°ad= Map 4A-5 .t` Hennepin County,MnDOT '`�j r' _ "`> Ai ,= yQ k„ ¢ass ho�a f ..�/ V _ ��``a�Y i���`', b°.i„ •4.# �. ���' 1 ` � vv L.� gt�"/C� 1 11 V� ill �1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Existing Non-Motorized Facilities&RBTN ah M BOLTON �fi�^Ar`roA� Orono,MN November 2018 & MEN s. Real People.Real Solutions. gNi\ Turner Roatl a775 .10 ♦♦ ,,,r;',., o� Maori }�� '( � + '. leo i Drake Dr W� o,, v ,Ei4 ; :; Ave w s u { 3 r 6 ° •o �� �o' ♦I' �a�'` `�� �•6spvo14 5! ` � , w,... �oa� aSpAn. Z. I • ♦♦' R' ♦� Z ��Z !KelleywPkiz . „„r m �° c ` % . ./. ♦, , :..�6°\\a� /I �� y, I< • 8th AvelN �pve :'ir='ly „, '''';":::2'.1":-. ,..0111111 Moline • Road m . ‘1;S,?..,,,,,, m kliis p, !S�” a�' .,: a" ;:am,iwNb.,.."= a Y ° e Grand Ave Ln. 11" .' ♦ f ..,. Ratl I , ��� ' ..voir,,.....---t3:'1,. a ,, .. ,R/o, . w's 0 p,,-4 . i , .. 19 eaysl e % a I µ3 ti eWs P I w tl m 26 / m - � �•��. ,i`�� �Q7 rise CQ7a _ ,.. ,_. Wa �v Road �1ss ,.: m Painter `^ a'a. �" 1S5 Fox St I. ��� o' W Branch Road County Road 151 .'`"r ,�, Y" - LL., w.: '♦ „,,,,,,,,.,;1,$0-_,,,,.,,—.11, ,,, ,,,.,yam ,. • 'Norfh. .�.},. ,1„,,..6., . abagar C . .,:a�, .�q r► 1 Arm 'Muyyvll. ' 1r!,, ,'♦ Lake .e Non-Motorized Facilities&Points of Interest y 1 sunnyrleid Road E ° ;sorest ,., ,. 4 tarsh �� -z +' Points of Interest Regional Trails r^ g z Lake �� t 0 Marinas if7 Dakota Rad � �' Jaamngs t • y ., � ��.`� :„„,„.,„„..-.,t-''' � Regional Trail D� �yI' , i er g m 1 + .N shore Dr © Navarre Lake (Game Farm a rm;RoadE ~'.... i _.+� �� ,. .,.„ g Smith gra4kaltE y �r Orono Hi h �y Independence 11 — x =:: ��; • Bay Fbrn School Regional Trail N 4 0 West +'.' + 5 Lake Minnetonka � � � /y�`` . � „p Q no ceArena Villi 4r ,411 ..,44iitni-- Dalcfr Crystal gey,� � �)I� „� �^"° Oro I if,. - LRT Regional rz o Lake'. Bdyf ,� Orono Trail .i t* ,t.' +�° �6ke 0 Intermediate Luce Line State � Hay � " � :� �.'1.."':';''''''''''-' t .i ,.;;;',4.•:'''' v Mmnefanka School m f� r d ,/ Trail r � E ri�� r '4^,;,,,,''''. � r � � � ��I� O Orono Middle 8 �Lynwood nwood Blvtl E -,•+. � - ` R �� Tiegr 1 RBTN y o■iY�'q --Jam+ �� .5)4, �t "+ School �' — ". „,� '�^ — �/Ali nment !� w �� „ - ,<S"-- —.tea 4 y r cn I r Schumann 7:-- ._; ��, ,' �a 15 y �a�� ��;„skafayaffe: t„.� : ,, a c .T e Q Etementa /�� �Tier 2 RBTN -m77'-'' , w me Ave 2 y « — \/Alignment N , r School Tier. RBTN w 0 Legendr =am Other Trails ' r ' � '''''''-'":1,:- -� ♦ � :� 'T� • �, Corridor _ , :„,. 1, c t ' , •f„.c�. `E'" , ^ , Existin o CityLimits Lakes 8 Ponds ' SpriRg/ ¢ / ` ' f - °'_ ' v g Regional Trail f e� t •;PeH etmans , ' i a _ "'. ♦ y 'I N • Search Corridors r i a ♦ ♦ Planned i ° gay Bay ♦ '''"'-'''':g"'''-'''''''4':'''''''''. �r► • ~ Regional Trails- ? 2040 MusA ✓'s Rivers a Streams I !0 /� /Local Sidewalks 2040 System E I�� t ! i - V &Trails Additions •r 0 3,500 mv ♦ -c;-..'"co.,,,;::.,,,,„,,,,,,,,",„' `•v ; I ♦ rvd.:„ w� Feet „. Pkun l�:s n;' .' .,, "'. *”' .° '✓�• ® ► �� 1-, Source:Met.Council,City of Orono, a 4A-6 ry F & Hennepin County,MnDOT i t �4 0e t' map 'om I► �� t jj w ��N�, BOLTON a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure / B MENK Orono,MN November 2018 ........,.. or kesNOPt. Real People.Real Solutions. II w YP '" ...LLL 'm Turner Road m, .. w. M Stae ��� ��4 Y ,,,,-,,:'-'•..':.a a ' • a -.-_dA11 �� Lake Tr t �a A a� - rir ,/ul Drake Dr i° p .. 6ty ii v "' .�.. o. -° `'DCCkeY c Boyj•-"i . d �N f w'x... 2 M p o 6 •. �•,. Laky m Spring �� .. z take meµ lig spvea Classes z •' •,`, 112 rc Kelley.pkt!Y Lony r2'.;.,'",.',„iso r v".�111111 �. ra I F I O°� \ 1m •1111;11�' c �81 AveiN y. �1 pay a, ,w% Wa > c ry F }ZOG r v ! Orchr. g. .� O' LL ° 5 :: ttra �y 2:,•;',.'6'.,•,. Moline Road w dr',town °� v Grand Ave ararc t U 4th Ave N t . : o. T�w�'Roary o ,loipx.i...4 ' , ,g�kB'P w� �, 3ra,Aeee l' f � 1� 19 N �4 y o om to : ..,.». eayslrle 11' •�` ayzata,,, yy. —,E f, . .., \( �,��,2B 19 Rosa - c m •_ �® r •. wghway r7F .„ ;' ` o v !,,,,,,',',7-es,f 1 � m 1 E $IvdE � � .....15.........- _ �r• _. ink f Road s•` Bey Fox St m „c,., re .,-.,:i.::•.-77 p a Painter : `_,. . ' v �' m� �ti�W Branch Road County Road 157 ., V 11, i �m♦D� ' � .�. �'`w c NoRh: ,.w✓ o '�, rv8rh'wns ,��.::: P.eFaFec,�ryc�.l*`�""' af5�,� s. o tnr<- 7u3ra9er aY sit/ ` Mayw�lf:� .. Lak✓t 1 > LrZ1 ;"t L.r^; >t l ` Sunnyfleld Road E Katasf • .• ." .N .`''''f' ^ *w•.w :_:.' � MafbhJ}(3 't"�tr L a"•'s. '.,,,,i_%„,-,,,,,,--7,.,*;,-...,,,,,, y ..4T.,,,,-,':'!,..'y y I()I ;'ra' o a r.�.y. -Jen r-. r;,� Lake E� lYShoro pr �:•x �, 1" '``+,'�h. 6*.,,',.`• gwi w a Z Y Jenntngk..l . .-,.�� � �- ■ ``�.°+..a"r `r "�` �� '.v � �' s "" .,. a o a 51 m c „,-:"..,.,,,,..,,,,-.7,.„7.,..,„ a r v s i 4 ' Game Farm w Bran wri ♦ r ,7,4•.x.,w in :.4'.• ^?rr.„ ,, ♦n*w I ' c� „, :t; ��� �i�tnr ---,„1. :1-.1,-4,,,,,,,„--7,,::;4,-;-- ." ��' vsr- 4”+,.. '�r+s $g6'YP,'> 10 F..\. „,. ( c ./ .;;4'.....' J� West a`*'k .vii �.ry"`��._',1 1 r" w "' ».•.,.LPd-Y�.: 'kl, ,Lw.�"a , •;',„„r„,'"":� , Duty * -///�Wit,4,,,,,,4.7.,..,:.:..t.:. . .T°� t +s r .crystal pphiis ♦. -x;r a a ..c`t'` t % r� rq`,` �. rsa ,a ,/,‘, ♦ ..ww a, '.' ,_?, .wr"� ;, ,, *r et aw y tw ,..4..'. .. 4 ys" ;w . r k'e� > ` t 1f,4 .-1,-P,14"..!44,44' f a �re^rn 1 a a. =a �r ��` °'' ,,1 -'4,„t Laky • s 4 •�`f� BaY `YF - ` 1 6"....•II,I"4.4.14.*''''''',..I1...4I2I-II • *Ih)hrnro7ttt ----- , Lynwood Blvd, E.�d� r �' •'"` `.� .�,;�,:....._.._,._/ . 11111111!.„,,,,,...„......;�`,."� + „ �. t Transit Infrastructure • ` Sho=ine Dr:�.: A 9 ����►' + 5vr w't"''M ka, e* 1�#'r+ '.v1.^ c ■■�1 � � t :1 Y Park and Ride Transit Advantages o` rT 5° <yr_Arve - ` :Larayerta , r' "ra ». ;r , 1 a • � i elle► ; x x• .��a.�.i�$ ar ,--,-,..4.1'''''''' �,� • � Existing �,� HOT Lane 9 e ....-P-'..:''''' ` Legend ;; m/y 4c / `� �', PT i ,,--•......... Transit Routes �� Meter Bypass 0. e y s'.=. n` ,. u tilt � ,: o Ciry Limits Lakes 8 Ponds / P 9� = •' "� Transit Cente shoulder Lane �. rs S ■ 0 9 -,....,*,4.1,.., BaY , , 44 ,■ 2oao MUSA �•✓1,r^-- Rivers&Streams7 '4.!...;.,7-,,;i:•71.--,-, va .� :.1 r /'4.4 o Transit Stops t p 0 3,500 a,- ` ;:i�*„�, � I ...„....,..A.....„.:.;;...: ,.€��}�� + s Feet ntl� ,,,„„„.„,i;„„..„-;,;„;„,:,'',r,,....'27%..‘':..'-•• Caseo ;,r, x a Punt t '' M 4A-7 € Source:Met.Council,City orO ono, > ■ 8p Hennepin County,MnDOT ,;,,: "t n A�sswd1 Z f = t---r * - P0ON P°e14AIN `LL s al co r W � � N ul BJnge>IoIA ,.N� .i' m J — y 2 ,Z o.Peoa ACI, >H M ff = 4 1°1,?c.'',11111 ► fALIF , a j A' '4 ,f 'Q Ilk NAll A N ul MJ!>IunO '� 3 a".. I !1 E� N N IN i 6 pAOW C' l+ i T a { ® � � a 1.10.111 w , < ��s ' / i m � E io 0 O N ' ' Peoapund0 m� ,N qw, '` ,,S p t6 Rigid - (� > A t` t ml N m�c'+7�f/I st= �i A. ,, zs;., 10 n N c'J N ' : Z of�. '; ityli:)wa�• � ,''^ N ; = U u I I E ��..�...� N.Peaa alTO ePuied. id SPeo � U F=U � r� O 1 - m boa Al: Ppm 1,1g -NJ B �•-- C •J!.auIA : v as Ja JelunNl .m Y=. , sid as 1 ii/4, ca f. oo �/ i ,ax , �r ps cc �a 1 - 5;, ct da>f�edewel - +�'."� =W� at ..-,,4-... !..4*.!-- ro t ♦ 1 IZO lb N Peoa�moJg y��� 1: --I,,,•,..,:r walr :1: t ri ♦ 1 I )(—(� 4 ails . 4 ��ir" fir► agr NJO•mall!M T-11111 �� iC 1 \ t t — ,,, /'{� N Peoa! e8'Ieisti0 PIO S Peoa 6e8 Ie3e,U0 PIO o rt j y" � ` .i. ' '4' '. `a leas " r „ .jam K _�. 5 _ o - g _ 1 is Je61 LL -44. �' • Q� N is LJ�• oma" 4411 fir` --ckey Road h .N Peoa,(ee s9yn3S .`,Q ,I, III-y ilk �$ yf^oh.. D i a 's „� /�11 m Lj u¢ c I • t! a -'54.-;'' y r 9 ,moo . • R 9 '�' z • r+ . it '61- .... ^o i ' ' Air") ! aJo� �. 6l Peoa,yunoO 3a 1 . `t Ili P �' ya f!y r Vs co County Road i`n ` ,' �~ 'Ill O. o iii , .* `r A O v • CD E £B Peoa QunoO , f N•013 PEON 40000 P018r ll.,,.„„ ,....••• oO )J U Uc cu O Z v r ' ♦1 o `0 a. N O o o rc ''; ekx o " < o m °U m t m �1 a t re _ `ag as M 1. . m N '4.,.A ale U t� N �o 'gyp` ctOld c o 06 Peoa 6luno0 ;r PEON 41018E '1'4' :.: OJ '•V• m J o 0 .0....\ „,,,(` I �^r Jit, . �,, U:.: rld LE:94 b 91039144.Pvne5 qv0 Paw'lLlxll qn= Lp00NH0luopeyodsue+y'sdeyry9s3\x49Vll[laON9O'SI•J\l+euav+y":luewn,odefy CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails,and Open Spaces TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4E PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL PLAN Introduction 4E-2 Existing Park, Open Space and Trail System Inventory 4E-2 Park Classification and Definitions 4E-2 Table 4E-1 Parks Facilities 4E-2 Table 4E-2 State or Regional Facilities 4E-4 Table 4E-3 School Facilities 4E-4 Table 4E-4 Lakes 4E-5 Park System Needs Identification 4E-5 Table 4E-5 Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification 4E-6 Park, Open Space and Trail Goals and Policies 4E-6 Park, Open Space and Trail Action Plan 4E-9 Table 4E-6 Big Island Implementation 4E-9 Table 4E-7 Golf Course Implementation 4E-10 Table 4E-8 Trail Implementation 4E-1 1 Resourcing 4E-11 Appendices 4E-A. Park Details 4E-B Park Classification and Definition 4E-C Lake Access types Map 4E-1 Parks and Trails Map Map 4E-2 Lake Access map City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E,Page 1 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces INTRODUCTION The provision of parks, open space areas and trails is an essential quality of life element for the residents of the City. It is important for Orono to develop and implement a thoughtful strategy for meeting these needs in an efficient, economical manner. This Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practice of the City of Orono. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues many of the basic open space concepts established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's, the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and the 1980 Community Management Plan, the 2000-2020 CMP, and the 2010-2030 CMP. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. To identify the recreation and open space needs of the City and its citizens. 2. To be a management tool for City officials, appointed commissions, City staff, and other parties involved in developing,maintaining,and managing recreational programs and city owned facilities in Orono. 3. Serve as the recreation open space element of our community management plan, designed to address and conform to all the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan EXISTING PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL SYSTEM INVENTORY City of Orono Facilities The City of Orono maintains over 260 acres of parks, trails and open space. The table below summarizes the types of parks and facilities available throughout the city system. Map 4E-1 illustrates the City parks, trails and recreation system. Appendix 4E-A has detailed descriptions of each park. Table 4E-1 below summarizes major features of the Park system. Appendix 4E-B includes a description of each park classification. u d u u Q Q � u O W K R ^C �. L R c yn CI'it .E Park Acres a n eel w C7 i E Z a w w R Notes Mini Livingston Tower Park 0.2 I I I X Neighborhood Roberta Lee Antoine Park 1.3 X Crystal Bay Park 2.3 X X X X X X Navarre Playground 1.1 X X X X Community playfields Bederwood Park 9.05 X X ©- X X X X Hackbe 3.58 X X ©-- X X X City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 2 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails,and Open Spaces Casco Point Ice Rink 3.1 X _ X Community Parks Casco Point Park 8.5 _ _ XX French Creek Preserve 33.9 X X X _ X _ Saga Hill Preserve 28.9 X X X Big Island Nature Park 56.5 _ XX _ X X X Lowry Woods 14.1 X X Highwood Park 13.6 X X X Seven Nations Park 3.0 X _ X Pleasant View Park 1.2 X Lake Accesses There are 50 lake access point below are those capable of support recreation activities. A comprehensive list is at Map 4E-2 and Appendix 4E- C. Casco Point Beach(36) 0.3 X Lydiard Beach 0.7 X X Sandy Beach(19) 0.28 X Summit Park Beach 4.5 X X X Browns Bay Molly's 0.04 comer (la) X X 0.02 Winter Vehicular Shoreline at Spates(2) North Shore Drive at 0.04 Winter Vehicular Baldur Park Road(4) Crystal Bay Road(6) 0.04 Boating and bathing deeds for select parcels Gibbs Landing-Fox St. 0.04 Pedestrian year- round,vehicles x winter only Eastlake Street(10) 0.04 Winter Vehicular x Bayside Rd. at Stubbs 0.04 Winter Bay Rd.(11) snowmobiles access,Fishing X x X Dock Westlake Street(14) 0.04 Pedestrian X Access Park Lane(15) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Loma Linda Avenue(22) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Corral Road Extension 0.04 Pedestrian (34) X Access Ivy Lane(38) 0.04 Pedestrian X Access Spring Street(39) 0.04 Pedestrian X Access Carman Street(40) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Trails Ferndale Road 1.8 x Willow Drive 0.7 x CR 6 0.6 x Brown Road 0.7 x Special Use Areas Orono Golf Course 45.6 Golf , Winter Sledding and X- X X X country Skiing Lurton Park 39 Off Leash Dog X X Park City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 3 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Regional Facilities There are numerous state and regional parks, trails and open space facilities within Orono's boundaries. Agency Facility Acres in Classification Orono Morris T.Baker Regional Park Reserve 255 Existing Regional Park Noerenberg Memorial Gardens 73 Existing Regional Park Three Rivers Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park 65.45 Existing Regional Park Lake Independence Trail 3 Existing Regional Trail Dakota Rail Regional Trail 30 Existing Regional Trail Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural40 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Area MnDNR Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area 220 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Luce Line State Trail 57 Existing State Trail School and Other Publicly Available Recreational Facilities Orono Schools The Orono School District campus on Old Crystal Bay Road North provides a wide range of facilities for school and community use, including tennis courts, football and soccer fields, baseball/softball, etc. Additionally, the school property is home to the Orono Ice Arena (developed by the Orono Hockey Boosters) and Lee Carlson Baseball Fields (developed by the Orono Baseball Association). Facility Acres in Orono Classification Orono School Campus fields 20 Community Playfields Orono Ice Arena 4 Special Use Lee Carlson Baseball Fields 8 Community Play Fields Westonka Schools,Wayzata,and Minnetonka Schools. Westonka,Wayzata,and Minnetonka School Districts offers facilities for sports and recreation use,but are not listed here because those facilities are not located in the City of Orono. Private Parks Available to the General Public One of the most recent additions to the Orono Park roster is the Lakeview Legacy Park. The park is 4.5 acres of privately owned publicly available park land. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 4 CMP Part 4E. Parks,Trails, and Open Spaces Lakes and Lake Access With more than 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline and nearly 5 miles of additional lake shorelines,Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. Lakes A defining characteristic of Orono is access to lake recreation opportunities. The two major lakes within the community are Lake Minnetonka which is managed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Long Lake which is shared between Long Lake and Orono. In addition to access that lake shore property owners enjoy the city maintains a number of lake access points. The DNR and Hennepin County each maintain boat access points on Lake Minnetonka. _Ta a 4 -4. t' a ' - Agency Facility Acres in Orono LMCD Lake Minnetonka 4,700 Orono/Long Lake Long Lake 221 Lake Access In order to provide lake access for the general public,as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted,dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16'to 66' in width. The historic level of use of these right-of-ways (sometimes referred to as a fire lanes or lake access roads) ranges from minimal to year-round. A number of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice- fishing accesses. Certain accesses are provided with docks for fishing,and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography and experience a relatively low level of usage. Map 4E-2 shows Lake Access Point and includes a complete listing of lake access points. Appendix 4E-C also includes a listing of lake access points. PARK SYSTEM NEEDS IDENTIFICATION At the present time, there are many parks and open space facilities located in the City of Orono. These recreation and open space facilities are primarily under City, State, County, and School District jurisdiction. Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification Table 4E-5 below depicts the amount of park,trails and open space within the boundaries of Orono by type. The National Recreation and Parks Association recommends a minimum of 9.6 acres per 1000 population of available park land. Orono is well above this standard with 34.3 acres of parkland per 1000 population with just city maintained facilities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 5 CMP Part 4E. Parks,Trails, and Open Spaces e tr, l i` , ' • ,Open ®a elal Trails Acreage by C asstftca tan( ! Classification Acreage Acres per 1000 Mini-Parks 0.2 0.0 Neighborhood Parks 4.8 0.6 Community Playfields 12.6 1.6 Community Parks 160.0 20.6 Lake Access 6.4 0.8 Trails 3.9 0.5 Orono Special Use Areas 79.1 10.2 Other Orono Preserved Areas 0.0 City Subtotal 266.9 34.3 Regional Park 515 66.2 Regional Park Reserve 78 10.0 Special Use 77 9.9 Regional Trail 13 1.6 Lake Access 5 0.6 Community Play Fields 28 3.6 Community park 4.5 0.6 Regional,school and private public 720 92.5 Grand Total 986.9 126.8 Lakes 4921 632.1 Summary and Conclusions 2018 Citizen Park Survey To help inform this chapter the city conducted a parks, trails and open space survey. The results of the survey are available on the city website or by contacting the City Clerk. PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is based upon the following goals and Policies,which in turn are consistent with the other elements of Orono's Community Management Plans: Goals 1. To provide passive open space and active recreational opportunities to serve the needs and desires all residents. 2. To protect, preserve, restore and provide access to ecologically significant natural resource areas, wildlife habitats and open space. 3. To provide citywide bike and walking trails that provide connections between area parks, trails and open space and when possible function as a transportation corridors. 4. To identify,preserve and highlight areas of historical significance. 5. To maintain and increase access for all residents to the city's lake resources such as Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. 6. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens by City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 6 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces developing fiscal and management policies that support maintenance, development and acquisition of parks and open spaces. Policies 1. The city will maintain a Park Commission of appointed residents to continually assess and evaluate the current parks, trails and open spaces within Orono. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 2. The city will actively encourage civic involvement in developing and maintaining Orono's parks and open spaces through programs such as adopt a parks and park clean up days. (Supports goals 1, 2, 6) 3. The City will cooperate and actively work with public and private organizations to provide additional opportunities for recreation and open space that complement existing municipal, regional and private facilities. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 4. Orono will require land developers to provide for recreational space to serve•all new subdivisions. New developments that results in increased land use density will be required to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional parks,playgrounds, bike-hike trails and open space or will be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase,of such lands or improvement of existing recreation facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 6) 5. Orono will encourage the preservation and protection of natural recreational and open space amenities including lakes,marshland,wetlands,and natural woodlands on private lands though open space through conservation easements, private donations, land trusts and other preservation methods that allow the private sector to play role in preservation of open spaces. (Supports goals 2, 6) 6. Orono will coordinate with other jurisdictions, agencies and non-profit organizations in the provision of sufficient active recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of the community. Orono will actively encourage all school districts to coordinate their programs and facilities and to open them to the public whenever feasible. Orono will actively support and cooperate with the Orono and Mound-Westonka School Districts in their community service recreation programs. The City will encourage planning for organized team sports on a community/sub-regional basis. Orono will work with public or non-profit groups to fund the acquisition and development of recreational and open space lands and facilities. (Supports Goals 1, 4, 5) 7. Orono will strive toward connectivity between the various park and open space facilities. The interrelationships between neighborhood parks, conservation areas and the rest of the park system should be strengthened through the proper location and use of green ways, trails, underpasses and overpasses. Trail connections should be provided to neighborhood parks to enable pedestrian access. Trail corridors/ easements will be incorporated at the edge of subdivisions and adjacent to major roadways. (Supports goal 3) 8. Orono will acquire additional public open space parcels as opportunities arise. The priority for City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E,Page 7 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces any acquisitions will be for ecologically significant lands that abut existing park land, land that provides improved access to existing parkland and trails or land that facilitates the development of the planned trail system. (Supports goals 2, 5, 6) 9. The City's park dedication fund will be used for purchase of additional park land and/or for improvement of existing park land. Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, this fund will not be used for park maintenance or recreation operating expense. (Supports goal 6) 10. Where possible, recreational facilities will be designed to be barrier-free so that handicapped citizens have reasonable access to facilities. Orono will ensure that select new parks are constructed with accessibility in mind and to incorporate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards with projects to upgrade existing parks. (Supports goals 1, 3, 5) 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City's intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes,regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end,the City will follow these policies: • Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. • The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 12. The city will conduct a periodic (10 year cycle)park usage and needs community wide survey to determine if residents' needs are being met. (Supports goal 1) 13. The city will review the existing park and facilities conditions to identify needed maintenance upgrades and replacements. 14. The city will provide sufficient funding for the administration and maintenance of the existing parks, trials and open space system as part of the regular City budget levy. Other sources of park funding such as development park fees, grants, support from local organizations, private donations, will be used for acquisitions, capital improvements and major renovations. (Supports goal 6) City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 8 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL ACTION PLAN The following paragraphs describe how Orono intends to act on the goals and policies of the previous section. Park Commission The Orono Park Commission serves as an advisory body appointed by the City Council to make recommendations about park, open space and trail issues. The Park Commission will continuously evaluate park, open space and trail facilities and community needs. This ongoing evaluation process allows for identification and prioritization of improvements; taking into account such factors as population growth,demographic changes,levels of facility use,health and safety factors, condition of facilities, special populations, adjacent land use compatibility, and life cycle recreation; invasive species removal and satisfaction of community needs. The Park Commission will monitor the parks, open space and trail systems to satisfactorily address the goals and policies of this plan. Focus Parks and Trails The Park Commission will focus on the following Park, trails, and recreational facilities. Big island In order to achieve the level of management needed to operate Big Island Park successfully, the City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed district created and adopted the Big Island Nature Park Management Plan,November, 2011. The management plan contains a vision and a series of goals for the park. The specific bullet points require additional clarification and coordination with the Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan for Orono 2040 will be a three-phase process as outlined below: 4 1 is !t 1 mplementattot p .> a. Phase I: This Phase will focus on the making the park safe and accessible. • Clean up existing trails so they are passable for hiking. • Purchase and place a safe container for mowing and trail maintenance equipment. • Mow and maintain trails. • Establish controls for unauthorized use(snowmobiles) • Renovate existing structure(visitor center) • Evaluate Historical value • Create a plan to improve security. Phase II This Phase will focus on completing Goals in 2030 Comp Plan. • Establish a master plan for day use facilities, including but not limited to: bathrooms, shelter, viewing platform,picnic tables,historical marker,accessible paths,and a veteran's memorial flag. • Clarify the Natural and Recreational Areas in the conservation easement. • Re-evaluate the Management Plan together with the MCWD and make revisions as needed. • Construct day use facilities • Provide access for those who are physically disabled. • Conduct a process involving all possible stakeholders to create a long-term Vision. • Establish a true Vision for the Orono Big Island Park(what should it look like in the year 2040?) Phase III This Phase will focus on the long-term potential of the park. • Create the partnerships required to implement the plan(MCWD,LMCD,surrounding cities,state of MN, Veterans groups,Three Rivers Park District,etc.) • Create a phased approach to the vision(masterplan) • Seek and obtain funding. • Implement the plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 9 CMP Part 4E. Parks,Trails, and Open Spaces Golf Course The city will look to secure the long term viability of the Municipal Golf course through a series of capital improvements focusing on both golf and alternative recreational activities on the site. In 2017 the city under took the development of a mini-master plan to lay out options for the park. Future projects may include: Table 4E-7 Golf `: e Implemen 'i '. Priority Project Description I Porch/Patio Includes porch for clubhouse 2 Cart Parking Run concurrent with Porch project as the porch project eliminates current cart parking.Includes retaining wall and pavement for cart parking. 3 Fest Tent Area Leveling and clearing a 40'x60' area for placement of a fest tent to facilitate more events at the golf course 4 Fire Pit Natural gas fire pit area. 5 Lawn Bowling Project pending further analysis. Installation of a 30'x 120'2 lane lawn bowling facility 6 Snow Tubing Hill w/Tow Project pending further analysis. Installation of a tow rope and Rope procurement of snow tubes. 7 Multi-Use Trail Project pending further analysis. Installation of a perimeter multiuse trail at the golf course. Annual Focus Parks In addition to specific City initiatives or activities supporting Big Island and the Orono Golf Course, the Park Commission will designate one or two of its Parks each year for special consideration as "Focus Parks". In addition to normal maintenance activities, Focus Parks (neighborhood or community, recreational or natural) will be evaluated from a broader perspective, including potential capital investment. Examples for consideration could be: • Are there additional opportunities to increase use of the park (e.g. new trails or recreational facilities)? • Are special ecological or historical features of the park effectively featured? • Could the park benefit from more extensive removal of invasive species? • Are directional signs to the park and within the park adequate? • Are parking facilities appropriate for existing and proposed uses for the park? When designating a Focus Park, the Commission will also seek input from surrounding residents who could be impacted by changes in park use or investment. Recent examples of Focus Park designation included the conversion of the Susan E. Lurton Nature Area to include an off-leash dog park (2016-2017), extensive removal of invasive species, trail widening, new signage and benches at Saga Hill Nature Area (2017-2018), and potential new uses and improvements at Bederwood Community Park(2018-2019). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 10 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Trails The City recognizes that search areas for extensions to the Dakota Rail and the Lake Independence Trails are located, in part,within City of Orono boundaries. The city supports extensions and connections to these features where extensions can be made while being sensitive to environmental features. Map 4A- 6 shows the locations of all trails, and planned areas for expansion. Table 4E-8:Trail Implementation ; Priority Project Description 1 County Road The city does not support an on-street trail on County Road 15 due to its close 15 West of proximity to Dakota trail. Navarre 2 Navarre The city will actively partner with Hennepin county and Three Rivers park Dakota Trail District to complete a trail connection along County Road 19 connecting Connection Navarre to the Dakota Trail 3 Old Crystal The city will support an off-street trail that provides access from the Luce Line Bay Road Trail at Old Crystal Bay Road to the Dakota Trail at North Shore Drive. 4 Wayzata Blvd The City is partnering with the city of Long Lake and Hennepin County to Trail provide a multi modal trail along the north side of Wayzata Blvd from the Luce Line trial to the western Boundary of the Orono School Property. The trail is being included as part of the CSAH 112 Turn back Projects. 5 Lakeview The city will plan a trail that connects Lakeview Legacy Park to the County Legacy Park Road 19 trail as well as trails to the south that connect with the Dakota trail. 6 Hunter The city will partner with the Hennepin County to connect the trails in northeast Drive/Ferndale Orono to the Luce Line and Dakota Trails via Hunter Drive and Ferndale Road. 7 Lowry Woods The city will plan trail access to the Lowry Woods Park. 8 Old Long Lake The city does not support the addition of an off-street trail along Old Long Lake Road Road due to the nearby access to the Luce Line Trail in several locations. RESOURCING Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's parks, trails and open space system. The majority of the resourcing will come from the General Fund Levy. The golf course and Lurton off Leash Park have separate funding sources for maintenance. The golf course is funded through greens fees and the off leash dog park through a combination the Lurton Park Fund and annual permit fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures at parks as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City's goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions.Changes in community priorities,infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 11 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements As Orono becomes fully developed over the next two decades,the amount of money collected via new development park dedication fees will decrease substantially. Funding for the acquisition of park lands and for improvement of existing facilities will require alternative sources of capital in the future. The City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding and will continue to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintain the level of active and passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. Orono currently provides funding for park, open space and trail acquisitions and improvements by the following methods: Mandatory developer contributions of land or cash payments to the Park Dedication Fund at the time property is subdivided or developed;transfers from the City's general fund; private contributions of land or funds; fees for use; and grants. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 12 +��NO 2040 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Trails / BOLTON c Orono,MN June 2019 & MEN K •'illifti\JIIC o Real People.Real Solutions. ® - Katrina illillo 'y+•a'r o' o �.,i(, "i' 12 1♦ ,Lake �+ re.- Mon 2ptnAveNi 's pvo`' Legend e -- w, � ..�„'. -- �, ._. , ._.. •_. _.._ .._. take Tioy� � ' 2nd yrare @/�d�ice^ -3R-2 •'+"o-^ Imo, S.2 Z; rte-fl MCWD-1•E = 1 „:sa'.: ., 19tfhAve3 •.4 N r; City Limits 2040 MUSA � Y"'” 1 C.; Dlck z " 6 - ad � o' e - (j �� take ° take c i! o _ � � : .. :.. � eN 0-24 Clasen. S 1.x11 ,' ; z , °j 0 Feet !, 6J`� ` ,�zee�ley p.Fury• svc\O Lydia.0 D - illt s 3,500 �. IMIM=I Q Long Lake z° A 'i lerlir "JI Sou ce:Met.Council,City of Orono, : �oaa zl° •�����m Lke�• ` Cath Ave NCX y7 �/ Hennepin County,MnDOT r ' 1 r 7� DNR a `1 rh Aye _ 1-4 J p°4 0 /i ® ���. .. � 1 .O-9 lob' `. l J I E` ,� N• i 1 c _- ♦�Q 1°GJ �, to ..' rd .` •• -« -L I of v U Ste N 1)----1.--§, Moline Road c -- .� m 1 w C41- � Grand Ave L, --..!le -1/41.-4 Wayzata 6/a » v ro Ipl c o '�Oiiiii,N1'.."11171. Y o 19 N Q� ♦♦ 4 Wq a 1� - , L, _ !--��Z, `.•^. ♦♦♦ 3rd Ave 0 ' or 110 84. .... ♦ m O 115 �� ORONO PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEM J 6 ♦♦1.0-10 rn 1 ad O-1 Casco Pont Park ^♦ 1 O 12 D•r O-2 Casco Point Beach — 19 aysrdo I. �� .. i 1 o. O-3 Casco Point Ice Rink 26 ` R O1 °aa ♦♦ Cy°j 1 DNR-1 n, o��a ®o O� Lydiard Beach v '♦♦ -� z g I O ' O-8 Livingston Tower Park / Sh/bbs I. lli _ r p-6 H ndy.BePark I v Pp-1 ce i f slit 15•♦ aR oad L� 60 :.:. 3 �;��-•.urs an Patnlera c c Fox St ` I • a agY'" T. O-8 S dy Beach a A ? m i� L..�;°i�i ea Toro O-9 Summit Park Swimmin Beach o —� U 'Okw ioDt �a 0-70 Hackbed Parkg a•Y c qv+Lnf y' ,O'° sq.c. 0-11 Hackbeny Park a Parks and Trails o ^� F 0-12 Orono Golf Course Nd-r'rh�dii 0 -'. 137Dwn 1 a ndale Road W F° ''W y ,� e fen&ger gg 'uP xm l /ffi+Le„ Se en Natlons Park 0-13 v 13 Regional Trails Other Trails y ?° rraxtYettr m Lake at+ 0-14 Navarre Playground ar, o+ - 1t ` 0-15 Crystal Ba Playground s -8 D a 9aY - Fr6iinh a r-, L;- *. 7 FLow/ W°°de # Dakota Rail /44�/ Off-Street , t` a Regional Trail Forest - 8 Mash �, ,'+SIF. a 1. r P.K t,+. K 0- Preserve y Lake a it,' ,S, u 1 18 Sage Hill Preserve € Lake /� , On-Street In ngs 1 ■rit ho-ts s,eY 0-19 Pleasant'dew Park —h j Independence , v o ' �t N6nore Dr 1 r#k t pJ 1 0-21 WrtosnOff- 14\ OfF nd Leash DogkPa k Regional Trail '+s . planned eat, " It l .. '»� Planned • I•�0�8 H 1.f �� Bay a d r Yk s PRNATE/PUBLIC Lake a1 POm( PP-1 Lakeview Legacy Park /� � Minnetonka LRT d, . On-Street, �� 14rk t o_s q ��a Planned d'P7:::, 1 Ar»r �s?al '..61,75''' XRS + / ' NATURE CONSERVANCY Regional Trail ,gN ♦po B8y , 1 v 1 NC-1 Ferndale Marsh W Luce Line State ^ , LOCaI$Idewe u O f � 1"' rte y , 1 1 ORONO SCHOOL SYSTEM FACILITIES o Trall / V &Trails y:, .' ° •�;�Or " j' '"""' `_ „. Mfr M1nnetonka S-1 Orono School System Facilities ter' _ , `,°o o Road aVc '``" vY t L, 1't S-2 Lee Carlson Baseball Fields Regional Trail Orono Parks Iewa o _.`a:`...:Zi 9 ! .......-1........=„" Arcot \r 1 Search Corridors r^+� _ W�"Adri,Dr NbM1ha�Ave + r i a �;'c ' 3j Highh DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE Region Parks ��i _ �� r r ,O�1?r` !af8 CB 1 "' ,% r 1,Lok a DNR-1 Luce Line State Trail 9 ' ` a�lra•► 7. \`(l - 't 1 tY:,i y ; 9 DNR-2 Wolsfeld Woods Scientific o o and Facilities 033 , x ,6 I Lake AveAand Natural Area Regional Trails- O /� ha ��•_ ': -. 0-20 ♦, Qarkq DNR-3 Maxwell Ba Lake Access 2040 System Private\PUblic °1 W „..4'..,'":,,,;...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,c-7,,, vB DNR-4 Wood-Rill Scientific&Natural Area tri Additions Park �° ° FaR J„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-;-t...,,.- "t ' y� m ��^ - L MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHE:SI71 y�I i .-.-*"„: Orono Public o) Wnsh 3 Spnfigi.' ''. m O` a '"a" ,w a ''''!4'.e, L MCWD-1 Wolsfeld Creek a:„. Park �0 2 C§vmans '_ I Lakeview A� g Schools _ _ Bay ,- Bay '`'♦ „,.� 5 'Oao, 1r`D/i HENNEPIN COUNTY y� r ` r{; g '•+� 19 d� � ,',,,,..f.:- Regio f` �� H-1 North Arm Boat Landin Open Water i - ► o ♦ "'”' 4 O • • ° � THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT � aec `L1 ', Cir+, ap yk+�:* m r ”' SD 3R-i Baker ark Gardens .r,771. ="„'is/an , �� Point 1 "'d x°,56 t x 1.M\nnetonka 0 corµoad Q° 3R-2 Baker Par Reserve E /� Map 4E-1 ,,,,,.; s' :::::,,,,...?.......i.'-'-'4:',;,17.'+'`v,--' 4 _ .�°° ° � ,.. .� 1NI'a = etwr 3R-3 Lake Minnetonka Island 8/ � "� .„` ++ate w A q � n Q ' I of Regional Park - 1 / V .. _,'. �, ....,;. ... :. , '..T„:„' ar .,,, �1�►�..:'';..,. ^>:.:: ,,,,, •°) lV C L.� '�-I ' 1' NV6` f �L 2040 Comprehensive Plan Lake Access Points If BOLTON 5�rI kis Orono,MN November 2018 & MEN K Real People.Real Solutions. _ ernes \‘...21 { m— -- / Turner Road :c.. K''eyr rLaka - ) • ITi. �� ` Moon , ..�.._.._. "" III 78'' . .ard e/ m_..�..�..�n� .�. �,..�..��. ° take o �tl{y-. ,� .�..�..�..� .�..�. �..� `m Drake Dr rr¢ ---'-- . z, -- i z E. c `J""i .ci Pi* 12 'o .- ,.. <. .p, :. •o �; QlC1se� �6th Ave N R°ad ` ..........................._..... ' UWilli K p .a ; L 1 V� ! -. e `�� take _ Lake ,.....,...�.... ..,.__ p'' H Lake n,, m - ; Spring Z' .. ° ` �` Z ,,... rC�"• r" , n::Kelley PK`; m 1ydrard 0.. °i'1.. m \ tarp . „ w .:,... 11► a I • U :°GJ. i° " jj d` a, 112 W a 0 ()L--- �„LL, �..... _ Moline Road 'o � �( Df Char n _� Y�(y, �o•� i t-" -.-_- 7°Wn R a Ng ' =e„, l� °tl�a/rp V—Riygr °ay •. 4 U' t,"tits �'r Ad � v� n�. .. . J 1y ,.. .. . • ..... ,. e4, Ys,ye 13 12 1� r Jo os _ 26 � ,a, _,_ .....„..... °d° I N C n z° 14 1D � v _.._._ °Wnn„ � 16 Stubbe J A ' Shprelme,or _ a .+'n”" '" ". m y o v `/° 9 15Y U Fox St .1 Ln -...a--",,-,....,.,,7.4 ::.i err �� 1.15 +^ .t, v_ t 63" `Wy �'''',1.:2...'161' R°;.,. «... . --:::::---.:::::-.'.-----.-- •!-----1— _ -SON county Road t si. ,.-, ..,'"4,,, .. -II1 o �i 1A + it �c ��''' - W Branch Roatl North c��_/ .. Oa �� .•_ Browns" Ferny - P_e(,' 8 . 1 r1 p� w, Takeaget Ba ,ale Road W +xw.•w-, ^ !' i Trl Arra a - M ',..-^N La Y 1 , Y' _ ., " n. 23 zdk24 22� : .,do , Baa ;It .,Marsh 9 g% + :t,�^ " o r r .s 1 e low .; s 272 28 Lka�-:'.:r 21 � � 1 xY,'^` ,...........�.._ .' " Jennir�5..1� ''25 2D ..� �co ,�". ;.�a r 1 2 n .��10♦ 6aTi 1 �D 19 r.«„ x•,17'4 ..;t';'' NDr a.y„ „ �d ...- ,.. .....-. ...,�..... 33 '„ c i. 7h .:o' 'fors, , "„, Wasf' 32' 34 ♦ ;+. �._ 1 i,,, L:.;::::::-„.,ea n rB�d s�o :1 Affh , .; l ' hrfS s`��..' +♦ 1 ,...^;' :„ ”` tP , .. .._._ _.._. 1j� (7 ii ry, � wiiiPGIM owig m :. Bay r "!�wl '''',:',,;VC..;." -- Hanieun �I 1. �� � ,�. u.Mrnnefonka� p ., ,1. . Arcola ° Lynwooy " i ewe �.. 090 Road '� • 1 — 1,. �.. Blvd-. -. Ede ,O .. : • � 4 Iz a E -, � ,111.0111111%,7,- W�drm D 'i�� v �+`�1 I � 3 ° ■1� r ehe fL°a 1 o,.,., V �rr. .���!��^ �' ��Y��d��f ^s c"� + _R etlnd� ...,.� ( �,..w ..... _ ". m , s� ••J ! <.yrioAve ..� "1 {La Rio "La ...+ - - .. .;:-'.. ;:: - /• — - . • Bay v _ y r wLa l � � S4 ♦ �, '�. ,,. w`. � ...{Lake ,... .,_ ..., '� d ::::,,,, ,,:;40!!„:1::',:,::;:" .std! I•, � I ark;y 1 .--� . �p Legend e 3s °.1 °yr �• A1g P e Lake•Access Points �' s " / 0' I f C ,_ I r T. Lakeview'P°e L Lake Access �. City Limits Lakes&Ponds 36 Carman' 41 t �rjr^� -,,..%,:. I D ♦ ��'�� . Points IT 4 Bay l r r A" " -,Hj E I ` Ott°rt• (r 2040 MUSA Rivers&Streams 38 •• - °s411) G ,,,...ii ,,, ,,,,,,„.„,„.., Road o Ngr 0 3,500 t",;;;:';'" wia 3=Casco •� v t" n a , Feetcity Case 1 $ ` 1... d�p�rr E ,!. Source:Met.Council,City of Orono, ♦ 19y Qo hoc Ro?t= �d �x-....4,,\ ;; Map 4E-2 Hennepin County,MnDOT 3�,� .fid -� rr p own ur -p Vine St S Ln Appendix 4E-A: Park Histories and Details. Park Name: Antoine Park -. r vv Classification: Neighborhood Park Location: 1780 Concordia Street ' '1:: Size(in acres): 1.3 Description: Mainly open parkland with some large �r 1780 `v 14," deciduous trees. . Facilities: Playground Sign � 9a;,. !', Picnic Tables ' it,`` "� Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential fi ..1„..„.,< ;.Y.,,, KK4 r 3 l Restrictions or Park sign must read "Roberta Lee Antoine "z { Conditions: Playground" in the name of the donor. I ) i -,a History/Notes: The property was donated to the city in 1974 by Roberta Lee Antoine. Until 1995 a recreational ice sati kng rink was maintained at the park. The abandoned buildings on the property were previously used to store the city's docks during the winter. Some winters and for the annual neighborhood picnic,area residents use one of the buildings as shelter. The Park Commission on January 6, 1997 recommended installation of new playground equipment. The Commission also requested that the City evaluate the existing buildings for a possible use as a picnic shelter,warming house or for their removal. The buildings were removed. PIDs Acres How and When Ac'uired 17-117-23 22 0026 1.30 Donation in 1974 from Mary Antoine Park Name: Bederwood Classification: Community Playfield • Location: 55 Stubbs Bay Road 9.05 Description: Mainly open parkland with a scattering of E smaller trees throughout the terrain while older deciduous trees surround the park along its borders, a Little League baseball iryr uk I_ field is located nearly in the center of the a,� park; park is located near a small residentialrih, `' ` : nei:hborhood Facilities: Baseball field , ° Playground Benches Picnic tables i Temporary chemical toilet facilities --' ;` E Gravel parking for park&Trail (a..roximatel 25 to 30 vehicles) ,� ' w- Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential/Luce Line State ` Trail Special use Groups/ Orono Baseball Association,trail users. Stakeholders: _ Restrictions or None ; Conditions: ' '' ''..--,,° t° g r .,4. c s ri M 3620 .: 1,. , , Notes: A 4" well has been constructed to provide drinking water and for flooding the ice skating rink. Improvements and equipment were funded through CDBG(community development block grant)funds and park dedication. A soccer field was proposed in the original plans for the park that was to be located in the north part of the parcel. PIDs Acres How and When Ac.uired 05-117-23 21 0001 8.75 City purchased in 1974 05-117-23 21 008 TF 0.30 1979 Transfer from DNR to City Park Name: Casco Point Beach -4 .,1,°4^;5",7•,,.: Aik;&;1 ,..,,.,,ssso ...„ ssssss , r Classification: Public Lake Access/Beach ,. ,,,', ;.. �. Location: Off Casco Point Rd. on Carmen Rd cdg`'pant Rd , N v '+ r': 0.3 , ' �' 1147 ' 1' .: y' Description: Narrow strip of Land that was originally a �► t , street used as a water access point to fill fire ,-«t. , , trucks with water. Park is situated between i` a two residential lake shore •ro.erties. •�„ `` A', '. Facilities: Bike rack Picnic Table `' �' it 7Apo Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential t,4'• ' ' 10� 4 4 :° ir , Special use Groups/ Neighborhood residents Stakeholders: � Restrictions or None " t f � Conditions: `` Notes: Casco Point Beach is a narrow strip of land 60 feet wide and 235 feet long between 2871 and 2879 Casco Point Road on Spring Park Bay. PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired Dedicated ROW 0.3 Dedicated right-of-way("Carman Ave.")in the plat of`Spring Park' (1881) Park Name: Casco Point Ice Rink a' +a"rD1Rik . ry Classification: Special Use Area �' _�. i , Location: On Casco Point Rd. before Dunwoody Ave. • and one block south of Shoreline Dr. " -'„ Size in acres : 3.1 Description: The majority of the land is now open space p .�" 47 which abuts an adjoining wetland area, an open area used as an ice rink occupies the 4* front of the park. The park is heavily wooded in the rear. Facilities: Ice Rink Parkin:. 1 Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential 4. ,,. _,..,,, y Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: N. - i Restrictions or None i0" I F.Conditions: . �. `' q¢,: '. " -' 2C Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired 20-117-23 21 0022 3.00 Purchased by City in 1966 Park Name: Casco Point Park ��,. > h ,~-'� s2e� Classification: Community Park '' --7::::;:;-: ' ::,;;:(„ ??a9 �,,yti,L.- :''' ''::?:' e « fir, Location: Casco Point Circle � ,� �� `' � ` 3zA" , ,fly a c ` "4 -^. - 8.25 ,:-'46,- ': ° .5.\,. 1232112122511111MDescription: Heavily wooded lot with several meadows `moo * s a .4.,,,..,_:‘,47..,:,..1,,..:, Is and gradually sloping terrain located at the tip ' ` _ " *' of Casco Point, park has one low lying area *` .- that acts as a catch basin;passive conservation ` `,.,, . '` area ^, y �� ' Facilities: Sign m' z Mowed Areas h ; 4 f Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ ' *' Stakeholders: v Restrictions or The deed to the property, dated December Conditions: 30, 1971, specifies that the conveyed premises shall be maintained as an open ,� space natural woodland,that no buildings ' .. •- N k\ ,t may be constructed,no recreational facilities € ,r.t3 e`� as ' .,,,„,,,,,4„..,.. ` . inconsistent with the retention and preservation of the land, and no construction of a parking lot,washroom facility and/or other permanent structures. Notes: Casco Point Park is an 8 acre park at the end of Casco Point Road. It is left in its natural state and only mowed 3-4 times per year. PIDs Acres How and When Ac s uired 20-117-23 43 0031 8.50 Quit-claim deeded to City in 1971 by Casco Point residents Park Name: Crystal Bay Park i3 -' ,r.1 .t..i's i Classification: Neighborhood Park "`' ,ti - -�, - 1251 <:" Location: 1335 Brown Road South 1250 ; Jf r ` it • 2.39 i_ 1270 Description: Flat terrain with a division in park space, between the playground . i 1275 area and the open space by a row of tall evergreens. The park shares / it a .arkin_ lot with the C stal Bay Post Office. Facilities: Playground 1290 Park benches 1285 / it Picnic tables -r---.0 Park identification sign Well Small Basket Ball Court o ca i Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential c� • , k J Special use Groups/ Noner Stakeholders: - Restrictions or None Conditions: s Notes: This playground was developed using park dedication and CDBG .4 7risii funds. The portion of the park area north of the Post Office was 1335 converted into a park by the City when they demolished the old city ` f x136 administrative and public works buildings in 1993. Open space on ,f, the north side of the park may at some time in the future be developed ,' x` into an ice rink µ o ,„ f PIDs Acres How and When Ac.uired 10-117-23 31 0024 0.17 Orig. Village Hall site, acquired 1906 10-117-23 31 0025 0.16 Purchased 1920 10-117-23 31 0026 0.15 Purchased 1944 10-117-23 31 0027 0.14 Purchased 1944 10-117-23 31 0097 0.90 Purchased 1958-67 (4 parcels total) 10-117-23 31 0101 0.87 Purchased 1974-1980 (3 lots) 1111:;rts; Park Name: Livingston Tower Park Classification: Mini-park Location: Corner of Livingston and Blaine streets IIBENTEM• V 0.2 Description: Very small parcel with pine trees and three benches Facilities: Picnic Tables Benches Bike Rack Historical/Information Signs Paver Patio Flower Gardens Adjacent Land Use: Single and multi-family residential. Special use Groups/ None I 4 Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: air 4' Notes: Sculpted bird bath was constructed with funds from Westonka Lions and park dedication funds for the city by a local artist. Park was rehabilitated in 2015. PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired 17-117-23 34 0048 0.20 Dedicated as 'Park Outlot' in plat of`Navarro' (1982) Park Name: Seven Nations Natural Area fie• �3 r. Classification: Community Park "=;r Location: Watertown Rd '"'" 1 i�' lallEMEM 3.04 Description: Truncated piece of property that has slightly rolling terrain located within the � i ; Thorou:hbred subdivision f 1 Facilities: Parking Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential in Special use Groups/ There have been claims of a connection of CV Stakeholders: the land with Native American !you.s. �. Restrictions or None Conditions: • • f 4, A 2643 Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Ac I uired 04-117-23 12 0020 3.04 Acquired in 1994 via Park Dedication from development of Old Crystal Bay Road Addition Park Name: French Creek Preserve „ . Classification: Community Park . -ate Location: 898 Old Crystal Bay Road South IMEraliV 33.9 j Description: About 7 acres of the dedicated portion are a wetland wildlife and about 4 acres are prairie y land preserve. The 7 acres open pond(which ° 20 years ago was once a sewer pond) is from r 1.5 feet to 4 feet in depth and is surrounded by wetlands on the east and south. The NW corner of the 4 acres is a restored prairie which rises us sli t htl from the mond. Facilities: Gravel parking for approximately 8 to 10 Vehicles 1 7 : Benches . i � Restored prairie ' 4” Trails 1 _ 41111, Park identification sign Information sins Adjacent Land Use: Mostly open space, some single family residences Special use Groups/ None' Stakeholders: a"' ° Restrictions or None , ' t, Jsrest,,,..,__„,..-....;1 -,,,-; ‘___ Conditions: Notes: There has been some discrepancy on determining how many acres the preserve actually holds,the city dedicated the northern portion of the property as parkland,which has been noted in records as being approximately 11 acres. Another portion of the preserve which fell into tax forfeiture makes up approximately 19 more acres;the whole property of Outlot A has been estimated around 30 acres. The park opened in the Fall of 1994. The City has set aside the NW 4 acres. The City transferred$90,000.00 from the City's park dedication account to the general fund for the purchase of this land. PIDs Acres How and When Acs uired 09-117-23 11 0007 32.7 Acquired for sewer plant(1963) 09-117-23 12 0009 1.15 Park dedication as part of plat of French Creek Woods(1995) Park Name: Hackberry Park Classification: Community Playfields v IIMPrilIF Location: 126 Hackberry Hill , REIMIZMIIII 3.58 Description: Terraced terrain, upper west side has play r`1 Tl , ' i equipment and ice rink, lower east contains "' two ballfields. A residential house is situated 1 in the middle half of the western .ortion. ;* ...".:,- Facilities: Playground Half size basketball court 2 T-ball fields Soccer field ' . Picnic tables ' �� `M1 Chemical toilets l` 40 Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential "- , Special use Groups/ Orono Baseball Association RR •.i Stakeholders: 126 Restrictions or None ,r Conditions: �� �" l,r ,. Notes: This park was developed with the assistance '` `r of the Minnetonka Optimists Club, Community Development Block Grant ` Funds and Park Dedication Funds. The City 6•. . '' Purchased the residential property at 140 k 1;4"^--,A y - , ,�& Hackberry Hill with living mortgage in 2016. The ice rink stopped being maintained in e --. . . 3 c 2016 due to lake of use. , . .. ��='nom w'i' d "n PIDs Acres How and When Ac s uired 33-118-23 44 0003 0.51 City purchased in 1971 33-118-23 44 0004 0.52 City purchased in 1971 33-118-23 44 0006 0.53 City purchased in 1967 33-118-23 44 0007 0.41 City purchased in 1967 33-118-23 44 0034 1.61 Dedicated as Park in plat of`Daniels Long Lake Heights"(1950) Park Name: Highwood Park Classification: Community park 7 Location: North of North Shore Dr. T • 142,.w Size in acres): 13.69 Description: Nature trail area that is surrounded by single- 1431 family residential housin_. - Facilities: Gravel parking lot 1453 Trails ��'i ,461 Com{ .. il. Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential has "'ig 1417 Special use Groups/ MnDNR for Parcel 0057 a ` Stakeholders: _ jq93" Restrictions or01 \ 150 Conditions: (`.1 y o Notes: Highwood was purchased by the city in 1971. The area has been left in itss natural state with the exception of a walking trail that was developed. Several species of birds, ground hogs, fox and deer are common in this area. PIDs Acres How and When Ac a uired 07-117-23 44 0074 11.29 Purchased by City in 1971 07-117-23 44 0059 TF 0.22 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44440058 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1980(Owned by MnDNR) 07-117 23 0057 0.23 Tax forfeit ? 07-117-23 44 0056 TF 0.22 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0055 TF 0.12 Tax forfeit 1988 07-1 17-23 44 0054 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0053 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1991 07-117-23 41 0002 TF 0.32 partof 1971 purchase? 07-117-23 41 0003 0.60 Park Name: Lowry Woods =£'41 }¢, Classification: Community Park "' fi. h Location: South of the Luce Line Trail between the roads of _ ` Luce Line Ride and Cristofori Circle r "t 14.1 Description: Isolated and currently land-locked parcel of land. =w ". 'JS It is heavily forested along with rolling to steep terrain. The property is densely vegetated with - deciduous trees and contains a segment of old growth Oak, Maple and Basswood forest. There ,.. . � a- is also a small evergreen mix of Pine varieties. Mi - r., Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential ". riga Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: r Restrictions or Conveyance from Nature Conservancy requires ' Conditions: -that the City of Orono maintain the property in a u "` natural state. No development except trails is allowed. Notes: Lowry Woods is a ?';i,> \t«f;ty; ,crol7.lri; of the Old Maple Basswood forests once found throughout ;, „i ; "�rte:"1_ _ 5.the area. The forest is available for research by j , ... scientists or for nature walks and study. Mr. and Mrs. Lowry donated the 14 acres of land to the ` Nature Conservancy in 1965 for use as a natural •: 4.3,3,., area with the idea that if it became inappropriate to be held as a natural area it could be sold. The proceeds must be used to purchase another natural area. PIDs Acres How and When Ac 1 uired 31-118-23 43 0009 14.1 Donated to Nature Conservancy by Mrs. Lowry in 1964; conveyed to Orono in 1994 Park Name: Lydiard Beach 40, Classification: Lake Access/Beach , Location: At the east end of Lydiard Ave , tin q • ( .85 Description: Narrow strip of land 66 feet wide. Parking lot is near the beach area. Area is adjacent to lagoons which serves as small marinas for Walters Port Lane and Carman Road residents. Facilities: Sand beach Bike rack a Gravel parking lot i Picnic Table gate and fence Buoys. j Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential ,i Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired Dedicated ROW 0.70 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of`Townsite of Langdon Park' (1893) P": �. Park Name: Navarre Playground } , : ' i 2 '� ;�,� � -", M M M Iti , \‘, Classification: Neighborhood Park i..„.\\ Location: 3408 Lyric Ave . , • ,:' ' ''',. 1.08 .o- Description: Small park along busy a t? intersection. Located near both CO „ M commercial and residential areas. b' Facilities: Playground ell BenchesAte” Picnic Tables Half court Basket Ball Information Si Ins � '' Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential and ` . Commercial 3-i1 'S Special use Groups/ None ` Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: Original improvements and playground equipment were funded through CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) and park dedication funds in the 1970's. This is one of the only playgrounds located in the most densely populated southwest corner of Orono. PIDs Acres How and When Ac$uired 17-117-23 43 0078 0.31 City purchased in 2004 17-117-23 43 0079 0.15 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0080 0.15 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0081 0.11 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0082 0.03 Old Right of Way 17-117-23 44 0008 0.14 Tax forfeit 1982 17-117-23 44 0015 0.19 Tax forfeit 1980 Park Name: Orono Golf Course Classification: Special Use Area" F.. Location: 265 Orono Orchard Road South } , ' 45.63 '',1 " ; L. tom` i Description: 9 hole Golf Course on rolling I . hills. .. Facilities: Golf course ., Club house ., t Parking lot(approximately } r, 35-40 vehicles) ,,,, x,, Adjacent Land Use: Single-family residential ! Y'� 0 N Special use Groups/ Golfers Stakeholders: Sledding and Cross countryI ,. - �a skiers in the winter x . . '. fi Restrictions or None Conditions: it l r a`mss �a t ",„,. i,' ;w /'."1 ^n , . :••••4- r & Notes: The Orono Golf Course is a picturesque nine-hole course with varying topography, elevated greens,mature trees, and a wooded buffer on the course perimeter. It was founded in 1924, and has the distinction of being the first public golf course in Minnesota with grass greens. In 2017 the parks commission had a master plan prepared to look at both golf related and other recreational future o..ortunities. PIDs Acres How and When Ac.uired 02-117-23 22 0005 45.63 Purchased by City in 1967 Park Name: Pleasant View f4" Classification: Community Park Location: Mahpiyata Island (west island of Big Island) IZEREENZMIE 1.25 Description: Largely natural and undeveloped land ...' 3 Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Single-family cottages ;t n Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: , Restrictions or None ' Conditions: Notes: Island residents use park to access each other and water. " 4 l co' PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired Dedicated 1.25 Dedicated in plat of`Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka' (1888) parkland Park Name: Saga Hill ,*'N Classification: Nature/Conservation Area , PJ Location: Located along the west side of the Wildhurst Trail about 1/3 mile north of Tonkaview Lane. EMICEIMMIll 28.96 �,.. Description: The park is also a wooded site. Facilities: Parking Lot x. Trails Benches Information Signs ,d. Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ DNR Stakeholders: Restrictions or Conservation Easement The DNR portion"(a)The Property shall Conditions: be managed and maintained consistent with the purpose and type _ .� 3 of property acquired using appropriate management and protection practices to protect the natural and/or scenic resources;and(b) Y This part of the Property may not be used for any other purpose _ A without the express written approval of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(the'DNR')." This ,,,w--,,,,, 1 _ declaration shall be binding and run with the property for a period "-4 l of twenty(20)years and shall be automatically renewed for consecutive ten(10)year periods. Tax forfeiture parcel has no use restrictions. Notes: The portion of the park with the DNR restrictions was purchased from Midway Bank in St.Paul. Area residences raised the funds for this and were successful due to anonymous donor. The park was restored in 2017. PIDs Acres How and When Ac a uired 07-117-23 22 0007 3.43 Purchased 1999 07-117-23 22 0008 3.45 Purchased 1999 `Sollner Properties" 07-117-23 23 0019 1.46 Purchased 1999 07-117-23 23 0029 8.70 Tax forfeit 1998 07-117-23 23 0034 0.70 Tax forfeit 2008 07-117-23 23 0020 1.72 Purchased 1996 07-117-23 23 0021 1.88 Purchased 1996 07-117-23 23 0022 1.91 Purchased 1996 Park Name: Sand Beach "7" 41 Classification: Lake Access/Beach Location: At end of Maple Place on North Arm Bay IMICTIMISIMI 0.28 Description: Narrow stretch of lake access.. Facilities: Bike rack Picnic Table Ci information si:n Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: . Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired Dedicated ROW 0.28 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of`Crystal Bay View' (1891) Park Name: Summit Park Beach ^ Classification: Lake Access/Beach «... ' Location: 455 East Long Lake Road EIMQ 4.56 _ 5 -( ter, } b Description: Park is somewhat secluded off of East Long Lake Road, park F _ 4 consists of a small beach area with a dock, a wooded picnic ,...,. �- area, a canoe launch and a wetland area toward the north side -...i4., . - : of the parcel. ' Facilities: Gravel parking lot(10 to 15 vehicles) Picnic tables Canoe storage rack :I. ;'_ Seasonal chemical toilets Park identification sign Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential r, Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: City Beach property on Long Lake was donated to the city by Bruce Dayton. This park is close to the Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area which was donated to the Department of Natural Resources by Bruce and Ruth Dayton. Motorized boat access to the park is not allowed. Park Name: Susan B Lurton Park Classification: Special Use . -,,,,s:S*1 er Location: 3589 Wayzata Blvd I 239 r` Description: Off Leash Dog Park :" ,,,..,,, .:**"44"'' ''': *'4 , Facilities: Parking Trails ::11: ;' ry Toilet , :- Well ° ' Picnic Tables �. �'�.d Information Signs !Y Benches , •. Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential t r, . , "Ff. Special use Groups/ Lurton Family * ' ' Stakeholders: , Restrictions or Restrictive covenants were established that Conditions: limit improvements. Hunting and ballfields 4 are specifically prohibited on the property. Notes: "Lurton Park Property" is the former C. W. Gordon farmstead located on the southwestern shore of Lake Classen and originally established in the nineteenth century. The 39-acre property was donated to the City by William and Susan Lurton in 2000 for use as a passive,natural environmental park. The park was transformed into and off leach dog park in 2017. Park Maintenance is provided through a special Lurton Park Fund and through user fees. PIDs Acres How and When Ac•uired 32-118-23 12 0001 30.45 Donation in 2000 by Bill and Sue Lurton Park Name: Big Island Nature Park Classification: Community Park Location: Big Island, Lake Minnetonka Size in acres : 56 *To ,. Description: :. v -* ._ Facilities: Docks Beachr Small Buildin: Trails is.1 N.:' ., Adjacent Land Use: Season Recreational Cabins :STM Special use Groups/ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District r t Stakeholders: , II Restrictions or A majority of the site is in a Conservation £} Conditions: Easement. 41 The park is managed under the Big Island #" Management plan, 2011. The park has it own section in the city Code r: ' Article IV, Sections 22-111 thru 116 Notes: The Park is intended to serve a dual role in preservation of a unique natural setting while offering the public a variety of passive recreational opportunities.The land on which the Park lies has a rich history of recreational use that today's casual.passerby might never have imagined.It was home to an amusement park in the early 1900s operated by the Twin City Rapid Transt Company This regional attraction lasted only 6 seasons before it closed and was eventually dismantled.Remnants of the grandeur of the Big Island Amusement Park can still be found on the site,including the grand entry portal stairway and old foundation remnants hidden among the Island's wooded glens. In 1923 the property became the Big Island Veterans Camp,offering camping and other recreational opportunities to Minnesota's war veterans. Use of the camp by veterans and their families continued until 2003,when the Vets Camp Board of Governors voted to dispose of the property and use the proceeds for other veterans needs throughout Minnesota. The City of Orono stepped up and in partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District obtained a grant from the State of Minnesota to 'urchase the .rose for .ark .ur.oses. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 23-117-23 21 0001 46.12 City purchase in 2006 with$2M State/$3M City/$850K MCWD 23-117-23 22 0001 4.67 14-117-23 34 0001 5.66 Name: Lake Access Point 2 ,h. Classification: Lake Access �0, 7960 0 co LS2 s Location: Spates Avenue at Shoreline i Facilities: Gravel access lanehh Adjacent Land Use: Comercial and Residential E;g.+Q jj� ` \ 0 e *. Special use Groups/ Marina at 1955 Shoreline ** „ 1.110t4 Stakeholders: „tea-;, Restrictions or Winter Access Only �'" ' - Conditions: Notes: �titir ,` ir gra .1, Name: Lake Access Point 4 .=, � 17 Classification: Lake Access �A�wRp G� �6i 44* .�,R "' % 'keLocation: North Shore Drive at Baldur Park 0�o Road between 3498/3510 `,,sj, v eP Facilities: 30 ft wide graveled lane ,s Adjacent Land Use: Residential _ RE p . ,O Special use Groups/ None N�• ,+�N Stakeholders: µ Restrictions or Winter access Only k' Conditions:' Notes: '(n.' 1'4- Name: Lake Access Point 6 Classification: Lake Access Location: Crystal Bay Road Facilities: 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore. City ' BAY Cts also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Local property owners Stakeholders: co Restrictions or A number of inland private parcels claim deeded cyto Conditions: access rights for"boating and bathing" �? ti Notes: M r- tt w aom s. '":` . . Name: Lake Access Point 9(Gibbs Landing) Classification: Lake Access r �F Location: Adjacent to/west of 3125 Fox Street. Facilities: Trail to Lake Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Owner of 3125 Fox Street Stakeholders: Restrictions or Pedestrian access year-round,vehicles winter only 4- Conditions: Notes: Tax records show access as Out lot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Out lot, , .;•. Name: Lake Access Point 10 2. R Classification: Lake Access i 3403464 Location: East Lake Street between 3424 and 3465 3444 3390 144 Facilities: 30' platted roadway 342°4 ' LS-3,,. Adjacent Land Use: Residential , Special use Groups/ None "` 4,:,-;1, 34„'° + , r 3415 4, o `oma' 3403 Stakeholders: Restrictions or Winter access Only Conditions: m�.,::, Notes: 405 JMrt 1 Y;. Name: Lake Access 11 Q Classification: Lake Access 3640 M '`f Location: Bayside Road at Stubbs Bay Road m �R a Facilities: Fishing Dock LS-4 Adjacent Land Use: Residential BAYSIDE ;n r Special use Groups/ None ` °• --Stakeholders: ` o Restrictions or Summer Fishing Dock ��` Conditions: Winter Snowmobile Acess aiti t Notes: Name: Lake Access 14 Classification: Lake Access 349 LS-5 Location: South end of West Lake Street :w i *- Facilities: None 365 ', Adjacent Land Use: Residential L 37 389 Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: § Restrictions or Walking Access Only Conditions: Notes: Drainage way for Est Lake Street. e Name: Lake Access 15 P601 . 151 Classification: Lake Access Ir."` Location: Park Lane between 607 and 649 CC " ' 606 Facilities: Fishing Dock .rw' do Adjacent Land Use: Residential ' ' 1 63 Special use Groups/ None90 Stakeholders: Restrictions orprim Conditions: LS 28 *0111=- Notes: 60'wide platted road, paved to shoreline-usable for boat launch but there is no parking available Name: Lake Access 22 Classification: Lake access '1 1082 Location: Loma Linda Avenue beween 1098 and 1130 1119 1090 Facilities: Fishing Dock 109b Adjacent Land Use: Residential n LINDA A lg Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: 1130 Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: 40'wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Name: Lake Access 34 *' 1761 Classification: Lake access Location: Corral Road between 1785 and 1825 Concordia 178, Street Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Residential f8s R*fit, Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or Walking access only Conditions: Notes: Mainly used as a drainage way. Name: Lake access#38/Ivy Lane Classification: Lake Access 6 '1 ' Location: Ivy Place between 3486 and 3508 i 1c.n°, Facilities: 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or Pedestrian Access Conditions: Notes: Steep, used for drainage Name: Lake Access 39/Spring Street 2600 Classification: Lake access Location: Between2600/2618 Casco Pt Rd. from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south 2 61 8 side of slat of"KasterCove" Facilities: 40'wide platted road right-of-way Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Used by 2618 Casco Point road to access lakeshore Stakeholders: sortion of.ro.ert . Restrictions or Walking Access only Conditions: Notes: Name: Lake Access#40 Classification: Lake Acess 2455 " l. Location: Between 2470 Carman/3555 Frederick. Facilities: 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to 2469 �� shoreline, fishin_dock 1 0. *aad' REaERICK . Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ t, Stakeholders: Restrictions or r Conditions: Notes: Appendix 4E-B App` ' B Park Classification and Definitionst .,' . =, Mini-park Specialized facilities that sane a concentrated or Less than 1/4 mile radius <1 acre May be publicly or privately owned and/or limited population or specific group such as lots or incorporated into a development site,such senior citizens. as apartment, Neighborhood park/playground Arca for intense recreational activities such as field V.to'L mile radius to serve a <25 acres Physical geography suited for intense games,court games,crafts,apparatus area,skating,population of 4,000—5,000 development.Proximity to elementary and neighborhood centers. (one neighborhood) schools or residential neighborhoods. Community play field Area for intense recreational facilities such as 3-5 neighborhoods or one 25-50 acres Physical geography suited for intense athletic fields and swimming pools;could include a community development.Proximity to secondary neighborhood useschools and other public facilities. Community park Area of natural or ornamental quality for outdoor 3-5 neighborhoods or one 25-100 acres Proximity to community facilities and recreation such as walking,viewing,sitting, community resources. picnicking,could have mine field and court games. Conservancy lands Area of natural quality such as watercourses and Municipality,tow nslap,county,Variable,based on extent of Natural resources that merit preservation wetlands that am preserved for environmental or or state resourcesand that would be negatively affected by aesthetic benefits to the community and/in-because development. of the negative environmental or economic effects ef development in them. Local linear parks,trail.corridors and Area developed for one or more varying modes of A neighborhood or several Contained within one city or On-or off-road trails that may or may not parkways recreational travel such as hiking,biking, neighborhoods in a cin'or township.Width and length traverse scenic areas v.lule assuring the trail snowmobiling,horseback riding,cross-country township minimums vary by locality. treadway has no adverse effect on the skiing,canoeing and driving. natural resource base. Lake access' These areas provide access to lakes for activities 3-5 neighborhoods or one <l Acre Developed or undeveloped public right of such as swimming.boating,fishing,snowmobiling,community way. walking skiing.snowshoeing and winter vehicular lake access. County linear parks.trail.corridors and Area developed for one or more varying modes of Several cities and/or townships Traverses one or more On-or off-mad trails that may or may not parkways recreational travel such as liking,biking. in a county municipalities.Width and traverse scenic areas whole assuring the tail snowmobiling.horseback riding.cross-country length minimums van by treadway has no adverse effect on the skiing.canoeing and drivingcounty. natural resource base. Special recreation feature Area that preserves.maintains and provides Community Specific standard applicable to Appropriate to particular special recreation speciahzed or single purpose activities desired feature. feature.Sited where most advantageous for the special recreation feature and the oveal park system. Regional Facilities County park Area of natural or ornamental quality for outdoor County 25-100 arms Affords natural features with vaned recreation such as walking.viewing.sitting. physical geographic interest.Proximity to picnicking;could have some field and court games. community'facilities and resources and/or where resource occurs Regional park Arca of natural or ornamental quality for nature- 3-5 communities 200-500 acres Complete natural setting contiguous to ware oriented outdoor recreation such as picnicking, bodies or watercourses where possible. boating.fishing,swirmning,camping and tail uses Where natural resource occurs-particularly water. Regional park reserve Arca of natural quality for nature-oriented outdoor County,multi-county arca 1000+acres Diversity of unique resources,such as recreation such as viewing and studying nature, topography.lakes,streams,marshes,flora. wildlife habitat,conservation,swimming, fauna.Where natural resource occurs picnicking,laking.boating,camping and tail uses. Regional destination ez linking trails Area developed for one or more varying modes of The entire metropolitan region Sufficient corridor width and When feasible,off-road trails that utilize non-motorized recreational navel such as hiking. length to accommodate tail. human made and/or natural linear resources biking.horseback riding.cross-country skiing.and such as utility corridors.railroad and canoeinghighway rights of way,stream/nver valleys,or at the edges of forest or prairie. On-mad tails are acceptable when off-mad tails are not feasible.Preferably adjacent to high-quality natural areas.The trail treadway should be placed inhere it has no adverse impact on the natural resource base When feasible,linking nails should attempt to connect to population economic and social centers along its mute. 'from Met council Parks Definitions 'City of Orono Definition Appendix 4E-C Lake Access List City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current Status ID Access Name Plat Section Between Designated Use UPDATED 4/2/01; UPDATED 5/21/08;UPDATED 1/26/18 # or Street Name Address#s Notes Brown's Bay(Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 No public access Not open for public use;plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline la Shoreline Drive-"Molly's Corner" 2-S Across from 1410 Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline (Outlot A,Dragonfly Hill) Shoreline Drive;popular fishing spot;winter vehicular access feasible Smith Bay(Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at Spates 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Gated in summer;winter vehicular access allowed. As of 2016 privately owned with city easment for lake acess and sanitary back up generator. 3 North Shore Drive at Shoreline Drive 10-S No public access Tracts S&U,RLS 192;these tracts are on the steep slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive;due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay 4 North Shore Drive at Baldur Park 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30'wide platted road right-of-way Road 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr I7-N 1998/2000 drainage way 15.2'wide platted alley-closely abutting homes on either side 6 Crystal Bay Road(West end) 17-S Adj to 2264 Pedestrian 66'wide platted road extending to lakeshore;City also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the Shadywood Access/Bathing east for an additional 200'of shoreline,over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for"boating and bathing". 7 Crystal Bay Road(Relocated 17-S 3405/3415 Pedestrian 20'relocated alley from Railroad property to shoreline;potential lake access from railway corridor. extension of Bayview Place in plat of Access The only known documentation is Doc.#507616 deed filed Nov.10,1908 from Wallace et al to "Wallace's Addition...") Priebe which states that the 20'strip is"heretofore taken for street purposes"and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court 8 Crystal Bay Road(Platted extension 17-S 3339/3345 Utilities 25'wide platted roadway;contains municipal sewer lines,potential access from neighborhood and of Hillside Place) Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing-Fox St. 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian year- Tax records show access as Outlot A,owned by owner of 3125,City has easement over Outlot,City round,vehicles maintains access winter only Stubbs Bay 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30'platted road gated March 1-Dec. I 11 Bayside Rd.at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33'platted road ("Oak Street"in plat of"Bay View Park")Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from 3640,No public access Two 60'platted roads and one 65'platted road to the Lake(Park,Spring,and Maple Streets in plat of 3700,3750 Bay View Park;and Theresa St.in plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka).These potential access Bayside points are not opened for public use. 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of 3775 No public access 30'realigned platted road(Realigned"Lake Street"in the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka)(See Bayside street file 3775 Bayside).Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 Pedestrian 30'platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore;walking access only. Access ID Access Name Plat Section Between Designated Use yi`=s' UPDATED 4/2/01;UPDATED 5/21/08;UPDATED 1/26/18417.,-; 1.w # or Street Name :.;; Address#s Notes ? ,,. .. .. ,... North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60'wide platted road,paved to shoreline-usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 drainage way 30'wide platted road,not developed,steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from Winter Access NW end of platted developed road as it extends to shoreline 1384/1392 18 Oak Place(Platted road in plat of 8-S 3768/3818 North No public access 40'wide platted undeveloped road extending from North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to "Crystal Bay View"; Shore Dr shoreline;mostly wetland or under water,Encroached by shared driveway 19 Sandy Beach(Extension of Maple 8-S 3898/3908 Cherry Swimming 60'wide platted roadway used for City beach Place) Ave Beach 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/1330 Drainage way 50'wide platted road,undeveloped Cherry El 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 No public access 40'wide(remaining after partial vacation)platted roadway,undeveloped,Encroached 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40'wide platted road;also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 ,Pedestrian 60'wide platted road right-of-way,access not developed,walking use only. Encroachments present Access 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 drainage way 20'wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 "Summit Avenue"(Extension of 7-S 1067/1101 drainage way 50'wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to shoreline,drainage way Elmwood Avenue) utilities 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 1453 drainage way 50'wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline,not developed,drainage way Park Dr West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive west end 7-S "4795"Shoreline 33'platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co.Rd. 19 plus tax-forfeited Lot 10,Block 6, (adjacent to Orono/M'trista border) "Bergquist and Wicklund's Park...";undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due to drainage way very steep slopes 28 North Shore Drive at"Adams Street" 7-S 4731/4745 40'platted road right-of-way extension in plat of`Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..."undeveloped, Extension drainage way _verv_steep,used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 Pedestrian 33'platted right-of-way corridor,pavement does not extend to lake Access 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 Pedestrian 16'platted road right-of-way widens to about 40'at shoreline,paved but no boat launching available _Access 31 Orchard Beach Place 7-S West of 1530 Pedestrian 50'platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline;tree growth and topography limits vehicular acces Access 32 Highwood Lane Extension 7-S 4156/4167 20'platted alley right-of-way to shoreline;steep slope to shoreline,undeveloped Highwood Rd drainage way 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 drainage way 20'platted alley right-of-way to shoreline,not developed 34 Corral Road Extension 17-N 1785/1825 drainage way 20'platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking access Concordia pedestrian access 35 Eagerness Point Accretions 18-N Across from No public access Accretions to the 40'originally platted road in the plat of"Eagerness";title registrations by most 1965/1985 abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline;it appears that Fagemess Pt Rd there is no public access remainine ID Access Name Plat Section Between Designated Use UPDATED 4/2/01;UPDATED 5/21/08;UPDATED 1/26/18 # or Street,Name,,, Address#s Notes Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Casco Swimming 60'wide platted road("Carman St")used as a City swimming beach Pt Rd Beach 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60'wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle-undeveloped drainage way Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane"(Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 60'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place-steep,used for drainage drainage way 39 "Spring Street" 20-S 2600/2618Casco Pedestrian 40'wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of Point Rd Access "Kaster Cove"-undeveloped,walking access onl) 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Carman/ 3555 30'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline,fishing dock Frederick Fishing dock 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Rd Swimming 66'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline,used as a City swimming beach Beach Big Island A N.End of"Lawn Avenue" 23-N 110 33'wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46,Morse Island Park B E.end of"Tooisit Avenue" 23-N 110/120 33'wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45,Morse Island Park-slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90'wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39,Morse Island Park-City has established drivable gravel road for emergency&service vehicle access D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+/-wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54,Morse Island Park E "Meadow Lane East Extended" 23-S 280/290 20'wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60,Morse Island Park-steep slope makes use difficul F "Meta-Comet Avenue South" 23-S 340 33'wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Park and Lot 3,Morse Island Park 2d Addition G "Massasoit Avenue West End" 23-S 440/450 33'wide platted roadway between Lot 1,Morse Island Park and Lot 1,Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park-steep slope H "Meadow Lane Alley" 23-S 450/460 16'platted alley between Lots 5 and 6,Morse Island Park-drivable for emergency and service vehicles I "Pleasant View Street" 22-S 570/600 30'platted roadway between Lot 9,Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3,Island Pointe 4°NO\ BOLTON 2040 Comprehensive Plan Lake Access Points M 4' `l Orono,MN November 2018 & MEN K r7kPsuoFt Real People.Real Solutions. namna Turner Road m K'eyr ..:Lake - � ...... ._..�..2�1 �._ 6 Mtc:. .. ala.4/ � .. \.s.1.1: `:}� .. �. .�..�. �..� .. ...Lake v 0 ° ah Drake Dr � �� � 'o = L z •.. :.:. a n. "m ~ 6th Ave N °yd ry=Ackgd°, �; F 1 � S Lake � L'eke; SPring d' rr/ a i .. ..... ...w..- -' paa , ♦ Lassen , m o .; .. _ z roJ` , ` s.. ., m Kelley pkNY• m Lydiard W - . PaiNerC Long teke-: z "�'.,`1.. _ 1 = ..� w. Lake .. a y, • V • I e1/2 ?.' am re ��77 ..�., .u•... ie°G d 1.' orchar ' 1 112 WaYza4 °4,', ra u. .. ... Moline Road o �° m �i'�}�!/. r1 Ln .t B �° ,p- Ric' a_ Road = , r� :fit .p ♦ ~. .,......• .... .w� y- ma y 146 sa 4� ,... ''.... Yy°e R t 3 12 11 lice.z—q .. \ .." Nw o D, C 26 °ay I eye/ ;oa. =f ''')6'-V. 16 Stahbs" J. : §h°relined)r - .w ,.. say � 3 x .o v, a l"xoi ''6 �5 .::2) Fox St L •Yo ��'0e eY Ln P° ?� , o, ;i 135, 9 �, aa.Dt '''..c", 3o Ao �i��� t o 1 a�as ° ti County Road 161. Y 7. .�,� ° y " �� .k-,' W Branch Road NOrth o��� '�4 d g :151 .Arm �"e -m'' ,y,-;,, Tanager g 1 F .� „•_•., , > �/ ' Maxwell .... :Lekp eri''''.-4'4'''''"°'' ° n _ 5 ntlele Road W mwn .a ��� r.0 French v _rnan1.... I a0 „1 ti ° e Forest24 ,. ;Marsh o A '„4.r'sh.i gyp-- 27 •28 . Lake l•21 ,�� � °9 1 ....,,Y ,., der.mngs 1A 25 0 2 s: . 110• Say :',�29 ♦26 20 3 ,_ v..�....,w.......,.,w N`Shore Dr ..-�-.......w.. _. '•♦30. .31 33 ^ Smith Brackens 1 1 t 8 R., s , ♦ BaY Point , .. q ♦ •w 1 '� p�/e ▪ Md''''''',.'",2''''''''' 34 w 1 i m Y Thr°evPo O°��s 1 Arm .es ,,,Le tal BtahnS .�... h d so m a'g'tr'.. a e ^1 _ _5' Jyd'ia --- w - :,'2.-':4-#4t/186%':'.°'-',.?1,‹ - ♦. Leke w a a, �� m :N4,1::i oy ♦• y” w x Mntnefooka rc...... —, ��a , s day _�' ..r .. Arc° .M., Lynwoory ew le. ▪ .�..>..�:, 'Cogo Road '''',%; � ,` 1 1� x� Blvd E {!��f E■tl9 a+p n A t • 3 r CI :.. °Ei �15•�� W rNorthe �afaY 7e P9 .. � • .. � : '; ;`,„•. Q4 - .,r��.»..^ '�1 'Arm D 6 e o. r *�1 � n � ., LafayePtaS Rutted r 1. <yric.Ave 4L .�..� Ba q ' 1 AZure.RO ,..�....•.� ' .,- . . . .......-r.=. ....� .. z ,.,. • Y I ''.,'4,-.P1,,,,,,, �L ke AJ F> Le: _ aa ,. 40, sb ♦ �1,�rk i —•- �- Legend 0 3j..,@ as sP e io �� �°tlR ♦ �� �4°4' A�► Lake Access Points °Ba �• G e Laken/re ew t-� Lake Access o _ r: City Limits Lakes 8 Ponds 35 Garman 41 �� i..,_ i D, > ♦ .��,�t, 't Points Lr, o ` 3aY .,. 91 , ♦ H- E ♦ l ,. od Road ,,,jr 2040 MUSA Rivers&Streams 38 c GA s Me 0 3,500 •••:""�, Gasu9 ♦ . .,,• Feet ♦ Potrrf""16; aoyd p�yo Source:Met Council,CityofOono, w •• Ni : .z.6":. otOW •an°t = y„ 7 Map 4E-2 Hennepin County,MnDOT 3 T .4 t f _ ° �� s 1j..t„„^ua�.,>:.t.-1 f x � gown ur f�� :. \ 1 Ca .. ...a;�.""d^,1.°,awc,„: 'f: "/r VineSt �.. S Ln� /^���\rL y`'r✓ 1 r S3� From: Jacobson,Tim To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE:Vacation Request in Highwood Plat Date: Monday,October 7,2019 4:26:11 PM Thank you, Melanie. Our records indicate no Frontier-owned facilities in conflict with this easement vacation. Thanks, Tim Jacobson Network Engineer 14450 Burnhaven Drive Burnsville, MN 55306 (952) 435-8505 timothyjacobson@FTR.com j +ier' US•Based Workfot From: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 10:32 AM To:Jacobson,Tim <Timothy.Jacobson@ftr.com> Subject: RE:Vacation Request in Highwood Plat WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links. The 20 foot wide alley between 4156 and 4167 Highwood Road. See attached survey, I just received this today. Melanie Curtis T0952.249.4627 ®mcurtisCaci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. From:Jacobson,Tim [mailto:Timothy.Jacobsoncftr.com] Sent:Thursday, October 3, 2019 4:31 PM To: Melanie Curtis Subject:Vacation Request in Highwood Plat Hi Melanie, The attached letter was passed along to me regarding a vacation request for an alley in the Highwood Plat in the City of Orono. However, I'm having a hard time finding the actual location of the area to be vacated. Would you provide me some street names within the Highwood Plat that I could use to find the alley to be vacated? Thank you, Tim Jacobson Network Engineer 14450 Burnhaven Drive Burnsville, MN 55306 (952)435-8505 timothy.jacobson@FTR.com ,ciiern,U&bsedV4brktare This communication is confidential. Frontier only sends and receives email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.frontier.com/email disclaimer. 400 11 11 111 11 111 11 11 Doc No T05045152 Certified, filed and/or recorded on 1/28/13 4:00 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Rachel Smith, Acting Registrar of Titles Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 1 Pkg ID 927791M Doc Name: Resolution Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs New Certs 1360448 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. 700 ' `ti J A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-330 FILE NO. 12-3575 g. 0.4 . O O CITY of ORONO 2 `�;`Ntht.t^h�, ,L RESOLUTION OFCITty Y CITY COUNCIL t ,,,,� ilif' c NO. lkESHO40' A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-330 FILE NO. 12-3575 WHEREAS, Scott Gary Musgjerd and Melissa Ann Musgjerd, a married couple (hereinafter the "Applicants") are owners of the property located 4156 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 23, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter"the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for variances to Orono Code Section 78-330 to allow construction of a new residence on a lot with an area of 11,443 square feet (0.26 acres) and a defined width of approximately 51 feet at the ordinary high water level and approximately 47 feet at the 75-foot setback where 43,560 square feet (1.0 acre) and 140 feet of width are normally required; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow a 7.6-foot side street setback for the garage portion of the home from the adjacent unimproved alley right-of-way and a 3.5 foot setback from said alley for a lake side deck where a 35-foot setback from the alley is normally required in conjunction with the construction of a new residence; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 17, 2012 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 12-3575. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 1.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 140'. Page 1 of 5 v. 0.4,. O O CITY of ORONO PIS pgo atlit , ►, RESOLUTION OF. HE CITY COUNCIL ikESHOg' 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on September 17, 2012 and recommended conditional approval of the variances based on the following findings: a. The Property contains 11,443 square feet (0.26 acre) in area and has 51 feet in width at the OHWL and 47 feet in width at the 75-foot lake setback. b. Sanitary sewer is available. c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot area or lot width into conformity. d. At 24.9% of the gross lot area the Applicants' proposal conforms to the hardcover limitations for a Tier 1 lot. e. The topography and shape of the Property creates a practical difficulty for locating the home in a conforming location. f. The Property widens from the street to the lake. In order to meet the 10 foot setback from the east lot line the house will be angled so that at its closest point it will be 7.6 feet from the west side street lot line and as it approaches the lake will meet a 10 foot side street setback. g. An existing retaining wall along the east property line is proposed to remain, but will be buried and a swale will be created on top of the filled area. h. To address the steepness of the lot a French drain is proposed across the driveway which will drain along the east, side lot line toward the lake. i. Retaining walls are proposed within 5 feet of both the east and west sides of the lot which will facilitate the construction of the new home and alleviate grading concerns. Engineered plans will be required if the walls exceed 4 feet in height. j. The Planning Commission finds that a 5-foot deck setback from the alley would be more appropriate than the 3.5 foot setback proposed, and recommends that a 5-foot setback be required. k. The Applicants' request will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the Property and not created by the Applicants. Page 2 of 5 it. 0.4 . O O CITY of ORONO "3 l` \' e . �„ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '�, �`' ,,� l_ ,i tib' NO. � ,' ima _ c, keggo- I. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent properties. m. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. n. The Applicants have demonstrated that enforcing the side, street setbacks, lot area and lot width provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the Applicants of the reasonable use of their Property. 4. The City Council reviewed this application at a meeting held on October 8, 2012 and took the following actions: a. The Council voted 2 to 3 on a motion for approval of lot width and lot area variances, approval of a 7.6 foot setback on the west lot line for the garage portion of the home and approval of a 5.75 foot setback on the west lot line for the deck; the motion failed. b. The Council then voted 3 to 2 on a motion to approve the lot area and lot width variances as well as side street setback variances from the west lot line to allow a 7.6 foot setback for the garage portion of the home and a 10 foot setback for the deck; the motion passed. Staff was directed to draft a resolution reflecting this action. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 5 ii. 0.4i. O O CITY of ORONO ,.� '� �, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL \\\N„....,._ kESHOly CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow construction of a new residence on an existing lot 11,443 square feet (0.26 acre) in area and 51' in width at the OHWL and 47' in width at the 75-foot setback where 43,560 square feet (1.0 acre) in area and 140-feet in width are normally required; and a variance to Section 78-330 to allow a 7.6-foot side street setback from the unimproved alley right-of-way for the garage portion of the home and a 10 foot side street setback for the portion of home and deck located further southward (as depicted on the survey attached as Exhibit A) where a 35-foot setback is normally required in conjunction with the construction of a new home, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey, building plans and landscape plan submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A and B. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover shall not increase above the allowed level of 2,860 square feet (25%) for this Tier 1 property. 3. The Applicant's building permit survey and plans shall address the City Engineer's comments and recommendations. 4. The home plans submitted are for the purpose of hardcover and setback review. The construction plans and survey submitted for building permit will be reviewed for conformance with Orono's building height and number of stories calculation. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (October 22, 2013). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned Applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Applicants and the Applicants' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Page 4 of 5 . . . fit. 0.4,. O O CITY of ORONO +-7 lae,014* A,r RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��� ,i.,•7., ,04 44,6 NO. 7 kESHO „Adapted by the Orono City Council on the 22nd day of October, 2012. :.:',Y---,,,,' 4 !;iti /v 4 - i 4 {f k 17 ,•,1r...a., .ires. Ke..p14......4.ex 4. ' r =LFft 1a S Ve CitynCleerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor n., L jiA. '...,1A1 41 roperty, •wner �`' Prope Own-r(s STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this?n day of De cetitie"- 2012, by Scott Gary Musgjerd, husband of Melissa Ann Musgjerd. //% i✓-you_^.'✓_ _ �'? ''- -rip„,'"-. BARBARA G.SILUS a,�,4, 3 SE-L-14- • ` ' NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA G, ifit Notary Public My Commission Expires Jan.31,2013 l� STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this o day ofdc:a,,-,-,/), 2012, by Melissa Ann Musgjerd, wife of Scott Gary Musgjerd. Ler%(-C Notary Public Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the Orono City Council on October 22, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this 24th day of October , 2012. (2f-ivi4.1-0- (/,€_e_ City Clerk (seal) 0 • • Resolution I SSN ExhibitA OF LOT 23, HIGHWOOD LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 35 4 1 I I 36 6 1 T esu 11 '-,S syr �OODe,• , °B4OS., .12OAD MU) —oto 10 /ir Oh_ 35.�h ,^4.54 e44'56" E ^ i 09 D\ re � POSED A -a'. RIVEWAY 1�! •64 �: a. ' �' I ` 4, _ ♦ ( n _10 0 10 20 Jo i ;37 NINE MEM ./ , �' r\vk a EXISTING MMIll `\ MU ,sw I S CA LF IN FEET �♦ � i 1 ill GARAGE •I \ PROPOSED vAnws. t)Smogs DEN --, I L, � L \ N:I \s, �1 F000(.1RM , �' Lower 3)Loer leve,e® t� HOUSE I \ ) tir j #4156 i I \ • LEGAL DESORPTION CF PREWES: \ \I , �� �,♦ Lot 23.I tWOE0 LAKE IfIEtCHCA .r%%]�\\\ ted:;r_. dl I ♦ \ I I N. 0: derote,iron mocker set ',moi 1 23 ` 2? •: denotes iron me•k.0 found I (9Ds.J): denotes..sling spot wvalion,rdeer,sea laved datum 24 I EXISTING ®p: a«pt.a vrppa..a mot wvmra,cora Owe rel mfr \ \ \ HOUSE --5,,.—.: denotes existing contour me,arm .\ \ I I ' \ — sea level mtur. 1 1 _ \ ►4149 1 1 1I ' I \ Bearings.thorn ore Ddeedttpon�on assumed datum,Beal s proposed inloVi -....-34. \ \ I I \.. I N ♦\\ Tlda survey intends to show 1M eouMarioa of to.aDer.described properly, \ I r ���/fRT�77 the location al m eusleg house and Qa'o9e,to A.removed,and the propose, _ \\\ \\ �!�y, - ' L' ' peon.1I dovelocation of o �l pupatea e to ghat ony other rrnfiovemenit .or ener°rooderrenls. \i ♦ .,Dtr �-yam \ ���� \ ' ------- \\ ....-----104 `Y� �� \\ / 75'r..?-'....,-, _ - -- -.VE \--' o'�--' -- / /' W / / m _ \\\\\ \ 8 •, v eV \ \ �5 ----9�' --erre._ ,n rrrr���� / _.--- -0----------------,I \ • /sem \ i \ / \ / I =a '"•N 6?)---\\' ' - -- - / °D" 50.0°--' tI �— I /I . Wet0R" ID .... / - LAKE .�'" -.61.0oOE ' \�--, MINNETONKA -...,� WEST ARM �asioNs — t k-.Dr la. Ws e..A.daesaeL>'� PROJECT .--r-,2 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. »o « .e A9 .o,thatMew.I de t urs.der.nerd oar loO,a. v s r i.l*row. Lea seen..w. / �CIVIL nrcm,t>s95.LAND euamos4 LAID pumas ewe. � r,_ws or der Stele el Yrre.ta. —l rye" • o, pee V w5 KMIn 1rLLOW PAM LONG LANE.MN SSJSS sow 5.orwowo mama Lase Nw,.MIan,, 'tan- 951-4]}.141 m • , Resolution Exhibit B4 . , 6 7 7 7. '\, -iv- • • - - . -_ • • , \ - • 1.,1 ' 4111\ /,..• • ••,- . , . . . 41 ..., i ..- 7"1:0-hae•I:inel Ni*,... 1 1111117/"... illIMINSuaillnill ''•'''s N' ' • IOW. MO . p,,p6,1/4, 0 glem,j p 1,17-4,--Ali Anis' •;m1 •- min - 0 7.411 1111 illi 10 • t t... I \.., 1-11,.vle i•••fr-,e2,p tat.170.0 - -i rJ .s5 - if , i - F1.4..R.... i 0 1.-0 frA Kir •RAA.t tit -aitli A.! :iiiiiiii iii1311:: Wit - - "'An . ......i_ ____Fi„..._., = I 0.4.4se t. ism, iiimilam mil • --- - I 4=4" 'T''''' Williiiiit: timilillui .., 1,,......a. ram -h-rf'• fee.P1471,,(qew#1".'5 ......... ' • 1- rc,o.r-, l I.-bi4 1 l . • _ - 11 f 1.01-0ii . • q4-• st-N-1-rk macre/La; - i— — ——— — . . 1 - '•,. . ' ____ . - - _.._ . ___ . • , .. . . _ , r r • I . _ ..4047-iist.6 IL) 1.-oc.. ' . , -1 *.•--— • !•": :„•ss,, . 8,, __-. i al .,. .'7.-7,---=' tz- ---° •': — - ,------- .47p,7aliatt<;'":- ......:40;;;Li .,.. -- -4.... ......,-_,., 111121711kk'\rait.,.'1‘,., -- w,;5141:11--rirsi k.4111m.,-- - TI.:71alipimi Nor alrgif, . - • .. .. ./... ,. __ ,,t411911111111 I . ..q.,! _.,..___ • :,.. ......PIWPII..6..., - w3 • — 40 iis- --1 ?gni 1 ..... , . • — - • -,41.._-mmr.i. .__,......., .. . . ..........1 - i - - ,-71 A mem Ione WI •.ii..L1.1 ,I..1..,-,1,,,,, ,.,, • -- - ilroliiiiiii . - - nal- , . :,:.:::::„J.-7, , „ — ,,,,. 11,21444 - ; ' 11 of "....1...... ..... tip Ip_ .,. • . .„,. I.* . . , -, i.• f '= 12 S.- 2:12:1 .,, „. .. . ., „ i. - - . __ _ - tg WO W411414'11'1.q cd., r . ... _. • . , •=.t .f---___-__.—.#---_____— ____—____ _=_.:_.-__-41_ , • 7 _ ' _s...641t A71=-1. e• At tot *d...-.1 ft.•I:7. H iShi• •. liA"-_-_.-11-00 . ... .. --....'• .-__0014...' , . 4' ve • fi / zt zolz.... Fa Er-y.. P.,F- feAg• toil / . . , . .. .62. • , i' i. ry 441 � it* u. I Ik. u 4. i, & ,DA N jj / Ill% ,---- - 4 - •-, -- „ I pi t 'Ali! a 11111=11 11 1 d! ,,„.. v 4- _L.. 1- 4 , i ,, ?v,.. t—I 11 1 ii i - ,s I : + � • i k I t, ) , 1 = f �a 1 g 1 *� i 1 __ �..jsi•._ 71j t. •. i .I , 1- - - --I r :7i i ; � ;t I. t` its ` a ` tr t{ i Ii I i a -- ! i, Q ; -11 �I�i! i ( *,Xy s ;S:::..C..4\ 14,-. No ---.---------------- atTI•itsrid.�..•„Y3d(tir04-"DA — - �_. .. '' -iioZ/b�ol ay3tMd i� •• . _: . . . . -.44±. .n�ar sow - _ _ a` I • /. '-:.1 • vim ,...... __ _ _____ ,-1-0/1•r)lo t- --------...-------.--!:-.—•• 4,11, -I yvol • •-• _ .. 446 , •''''5;1417T1:7--laTei ';f4°3------0-57:-•----- — sa�a��o-T f t tpNtai 3 ami° iIl Ili i I • - --- -- -- --- ' O'4` t7,, / f4 -•••-•40.1.4-7v$,-,-,0-0,- ) II • I i ' a .wxstiYW� 9 .'Pif • - /,t L zilela17,, aU ,�r�r� • 1 . , , .6t • • $ 177 .i. 2.-zt;-(.1, , lot..., • r EL- rI5.4-1 I. 421 R-Crr.w r re& ar/MFf`e. r z'a256v 044vriy. ,0, -'6,_,• w l SM6L - 6fH41-;6N+E. C 1 I tea• -—.1`pD.«s_L�Fi-_, � i yr 11111111 � ' r < •i U I1t : 1 k,I w II �II 1,..r_ I r ki+f as 1- • .G • • - RIZ..4- It . Ij _t,-L13— GPr. • 1 L _�v ,ak , ___ • I ---- el . ' 1 I 1. . .14 • .1 s ' I I P1 GA'Mu :v--..E- qv tee_-.. IllI,.. ^ �� i i .iR,-.='34,41-• . nrscw__,ecs�_: .f 1 • r!' I 1 fit { �, 4- i, 1 i w ^ w w,M1 ,Jo I ., , . yi,,,,�R, d p i ,( • 4 NE • `'''- . YrT w • r �Tsb ---_Vyhl IF oU t' Loo -� lJ -..._-_ �YL_1d�Gv� )C 1� 17 _J4�IK !— . �_ ___. ___ __ ` .9e'i_d`-,2.14. 45G_.14Jf_ltWq,-0e!VP��PA t, �aoG 5P--t-i- !'W lti1-IED 1-4-rt , 4 1;,;. - - ry�" lty. Ira"D 5 F. -hri.-. • tzar:.6t3c L'zsr-lD/f6/"0`L . , J5 --fart; 17....ty.e. - 6 1 7 7 -1,,. e - I . -_,43:EL-13. tQc1/1"tm•;-P-faettSerizni-__4_ • `-t..41.4,a••• 11 7 I i_.. It 'I -.. I \ gi,„ .44. -7 , . , 1 I m-4 -o, I \ / • — II L / 7 . IJ . , I / \I I 1 _. 7 , - 1 u ®- i?ej „ 4_ 1,et.. 1 1 I \no f I., ,, 11 • j lot t 1• „-,a-4.,..,1 ;,„ To.B.A4 = 0 I L.14;14 AFF 1111iL Cal..Y. %,i I --7' -- i I F — I -I * I _I I 4 -r 1 v _ „, if - r o..c alF ,- 1....,...rm: 0. 11 41.0, 1' 1-44-Pri.-NOP i — 1 ___ _,te..tir I 111•4•,•#...I- 1_ , I - 1 , 1 .1 i i., A .2 . II 1 ":- I . I I 1 -- -ro ' -- I ..., -, . 1 1 on:4. L j 6,..."•vt:_ . • „1, ,j t--, fifif54-4 - , ,,,,-„ , , r , , _ _ .,"4” I- -- I fait,144.- , 1 _ _0 IL .-1--,..ti I / "--- ' I 1 Vail& f ... ' to'ro w-40, 1 5.,...i.„ le'-oll (( r ekke 40!goat, ,s....- • __ -6 -4 a ivy,t-I e.-') eftioroo-ta.,, t.. F i r_ .1-• r L.." pc- 7.- L-•'•Is-4 • .7440.44•0.1 cli0 5 -4/-Fir-31 .12/1-i-r.12,44tvpie ., .cv ., tyliyz.,,pit,-___ ____4"' io,To 5,F. _ac.":7-902.4.S_ • __ Pg4edik,ow...c.,.., ig/ /76..gerz, • 19.0 .5 , srr-_-,-,r-, ,f, h-l• oise44. P44/ 500-_Ps WIC/240ra-- _ 1 ea 09.... . -;6 f_e_4_6214figgre ..Y__E912-,__'6462 -7•41h e____4215 ___ . � t72 • • . 6 1 77 Z 3r_`� • III z. , Cr._ 9R3 i 111111 - if DI -4-• , rii - goo _ . - i tet". Az [ I , I� (I _ j' , a;o, lr1 1 _j, - _:til I —.° 111111111111u 1 1 ----a- . ¶iiioilI'll '' a ifi,,,,.. .- N. t lag: . . . Igo �� �1 .� ��,�, !� , . .... LigigragiLe,.,4_11M rile! • - ' . . . - r1. . ._. . i . i, ...i.e.O'll i . /II 1I .•-rft, w.4r,. • e L D_.E.k.of C I-.1 'Ael k/4_ 101.f4-0 }'�A,M__e ` — ` 01' 11. %.kiJk 1#4 pts _._ lt.5o.5se, +11-.1:.liN_ ltE� _ .. . Sp _._ . __ . .-. I..Z_a1_y- reurio�+- t'/+ s Rs..<.reit_ PS,G. I a/14 ze(� 7- �` MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application#12-3572,Matthew Fritz,4055 Elm Street,granting of lot width and lot area variances,subject to Staff and the City Engineer's recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. *3. #12-3574 GUSTAFSON DESIGN,INC.,ON BEHALF OF CHRIS PATNODE, 1430 CHERRY PLACE,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE, Leskinen moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application#12-3574, Gustafson Design,on Behalf of Chris Patnode, 1430 Cherry Place,granting of a hardcover variance within the 0-75 foot zone and granting of a conditional use permit for land alteration within the 0- 75 foot zone. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 4. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES,6:40 P.M.-7:26 P.M. Scott and Melissa Musgjerd,Applicants,and Mike Sharratt,Designer, were present. Curtis stated the applicants are requesting the following variances in order to build a new residence on the subject property: 1. A lot area and a lot width variance to allow redevelopment of a property 0.26 acre in area and 50 plus feet in width where 1.0 acre and 140 feet of width is normally required. 2. A 75-250 foot zone hardcover variance to allow 37 percent hardcover where 42.8 percent currently exists and 25 percent is normally allowed. 3. A side yard setback variance to allow a 6.2 foot setback for the proposed home where a 10-foot setback is required. 4. A side, street setback variance to allow a 10-foot setback for the home and a 5-foot setback for the deck where a 35-foot setback is normally required from the undeveloped alley right-of-way. The subject property is located in the LR-1B zoning district. It is a narrow property which gets narrower as you move toward the road. Abutting on the west side is an undeveloped 20-foot wide public alley. The applicants are proposing to redevelop the subject property a construct a new residence. Because of the size, shape and orientation of the property,the applicants are requesting lot area; lot width; 75-250 foot zone hardcover; side yard;and side street setback variances in order to construct the proposed 1,580 square foot home. The subject property currently contains 42.8 percent hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone. The new home and improvements will result in 37 percent hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone, 905.5 square feet over the allowed 25 percent of this zone according to the City's current code. At the September 24 Council meeting, Staff anticipates the adoption of new hardcover regulations which will change how hardcover is calculated. The new regulations place this property in Tier 1 of the newly designated Stormwater Quality Overlay District. Tier 1 properties are allowed hardcover up to 25 percent of their entire lot area. Based on its area,this property would be afforded 2,860 square feet of hardcover or slightly below the level the applicants are currently requesting. -- — Page 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. The subject property abuts an undeveloped 20-foot alley right-of-way. As it is a platted, public right-of- way,the alley is considered a side street for the purpose of measuring setbacks and a 35-foot setback is required. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 10-foot setback from the alley for the home and a 5-foot setback for the proposed deck. The existing home is situated as close as three feet to the east side lot line. Due to the narrowness of the lot and the narrowing of the lot closer to the road,the applicants are requesting a side setback variance of 6.2 feet from the east lot line. This will allow them to construct their home and garage with a 23-1/2 foot width. The property's narrow width, when combined with the required side and side street setbacks,only allow for a long,thin triangular building envelope five feet wide at the widest point. Staff finds that the applicants propose to use the subject property in a reasonable manner. The subject property has a very narrow configuration with almost zero legal buildable area. The buildable portion of the lot consists of a narrow triangular shaped area with a buildable envelope approximately five feet in width at its largest part. The lot's shape is due to circumstances unique to the subject property not caused by the landowner. While the proposed home and hardcover does not appear to alter the essential character of the neighborhood, Staff would suggest that a minimum of a 10-foot setback be imposed along the western property line abutting the alley. If the Commission is amenable to the reduction of the alley setback to ten feet or less, Staff suggests it may be appropriate to reduce the proposed deck and move the home to the west slightly to avoid the encroachment into the eastern property line requested by the applicants. Additionally, Staff would suggest the Planning Commission consider requiring a landscape plan on the applicants' property along the right-of-way which offers screening and delineates the right-of-way from the subject property. Staff would suggest the Planning Commission discuss the following issues: 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the subject property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? Is the level of hardcover proposed within the 75-250 foot zone reasonable? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Should the applicants redesign to avoid the encroachment into the 10-foot side yard setback? 4. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? 5. Should a landscape plan or vegetative screening be required to clearly define the separation from the applicants' property and the City right-of-way? Planning Staff recommends approval of a lot width variance,a lot area variance,and a side street setback variance resulting in a 10-foot setback from the alley in order to redevelop the subject property. Additionally, Staff recommends approval of a 75-250 foot zone hardcover variance at a level which does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot. — -- – Page 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis noted the City has received an e-mail from a neighbor to the east containing his concerns regarding the application. The e-mail reads as follows: "Per our discussion this morning regarding the variance application for our neighboring property at 4156 Highwood Road,I am submitting our comments/questions since I may not be able to attend tonight's meeting. My wife Nancy and I live at 4149 Highwood Road,which is the adjacent property to the east of the variance request for 4156. I had a chance to view the submitted plans of Scott and Melissa Musgjerd and would welcome the proposed home as a significant improvement for our neighborhood and our property. I would suggest the home conform to the 10-foot standard setback on our shared property line by moving the home's footprint to the west by the 3.8 feet being requested in the variance and as I understand the Orono Staff is also recommending(I would not want this to be a deal breaker for Scott and Melissa however!). I also inquired about how the grade of the lot as it exists today would change on our lot line for the proposed new plan. Currently there is a cement retaining wall along our common lot line that extends from their driveway to roughly 10 feet beyond the porch of the existing structure that accommodates the elevation difference between our properties. Is the elevation of the final grade going to remain relatively the same; and if so,what would be done during construction to maintain the integrity of the wall?" Schoenzeit asked which property owns the retaining wall. Curtis indicated the retaining wall belongs to the applicant. The concern of the neighbor was regarding the grade and the existing vegetation along the lot line. Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission could recommend that a swale be constructed in that area. Curtis stated the City would require that. Thiesse commented that it appears from the elevations on the drawing that they are planning to fill in that area. Curtis stated the City Engineer has not reviewed the plans in detail at this point and, in fact,requested more detailed plans. Thiesse asked why Staff is recommending the applicant not approach any closer to the alley. Curtis indicated typically 10 feet is a standard minimum setback that is used but that there is no planned or intended use of the alley by the City at this time. Landgraver asked if there is any significant difference between an alley and a street. Curtis stated in this instance there is not. The existing garage is located in its present location at a 0 foot setback. Schoenzeit asked if the basement meets all the requirements of the City in order to be considered a basement. Curtis indicated she has not conducted a review of that at this time. — — Page 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen asked if the existing garage will remain. Curtis indicated it will not. Levang asked whether the alleyway would be considered a public roadway. Curtis stated she does not consider it a public roadway. Levang asked what the alleyway is intended for. Gaffron indicated its primary purpose is for drainage. The alley was platted approximately 100 years ago and exists now as a dedicated public right-of-way. If the alleyway is ever vacated by the City, each property owner on either side of it would get half of it. Levang asked if the City would like to keep it as is. Curtis stated they would since it provides access to the lake. Gaffron stated to his knowledge this alleyway has not been maintained by the city. Curtis noted there are some erosion concerns that the applicant has raised,which have been passed along to the City Engineer. If the applicants are willing to participate in a correction of that area,the City would be willing to work with them but that it is not a project the City is proposing to do at this time. Gaffron stated the City's Comprehensive Plan lists the alleyway as Highwood Road Extension and it is a 20-foot platted alleyway down to the shoreline. Melissa Musgjerd,Applicant, stated they have looked at a number of properties throughout the City and eventually found this property. The property has a good view of the lake and grassy area. They have three children and they would like to enjoy the entire piece of property. Musgjerd indicated she is an interior designer and has worked with numerous properties and that there is potential for this lot. Musgjerd indicated they have met a lot of the neighbors already and that they would like to construct a home that fits into the neighborhood and would increase their values as well. Musgjerd indicated she does have a couple of pictures of the alleyway. The alleyway basically is full of trees at this time. Musgjerd indicated they did ask the City if they could eventually purchase it but were told they cannot. There is runoff that is causing some erosion to the beach on this property and they would like to work with the City to correct that situation at some point in the future. Sharratt noted the Musgjerds'purchase agreement is contingent upon the City's approval of their application. Sharratt stated the area depicted in yellow on the survey is the only buildable area on the lot. The existing garage is located on the street property line. The existing home is only two and a half feet from the east property line. Sharratt stated when they began this process, they set out to try to cure every possible nonconformity that they could. The 6.2 feet is an alternative that was discussed with Surveyor Mark Gronberg. The site plan says a 10-foot side yard setback on the east side but the proposed plan shows the house as being 10 feet — Page 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. from the west side,which is a discrepancy that will need to be corrected. Sharratt indicated they would be willing to have the 10-foot setback on the west side since that is what the neighbor would prefer. Sharratt stated in addition,they have resolved the existing garage setback issue and they are now in excess of the 30 feet required on the street side and 10 feet on the east side. The neighbor would prefer it to be shifted to the west,which can be done. Sharratt noted Staffs report states the lot on the street side is 50 feet wide but it is approximately 40 feet wide. Due to the narrowness of the lot,they will need to be over one of the setbacks no matter what in order to have a two-car garage. The Musgjerds would like to have an outdoor space at the main level,which is what the deck is for. The deck has been designed up on brackets so there are no posts in the ground. Sharratt stated he realizes the deck would still be considered structure but that they are attempting to minimize the impact to the setback on the alley side. They are also in complete conformance with the lakeside setback. As far as the hardcover is concerned,the existing hardcover on the lot is at 42.8 percent in the 75-250 foot zone,which would be 28 percent under the new ordinance. The applicants are proposing 37 percent hardcover under the current regulations,which would be 24.2 percent under the new hardcover ordinance. Sharratt indicated they attempted to keep the mass of the house low by designing the roof in this fashion. Landgraver noted the land drops down significantly and asked how the grading would change since the neighbor to the east is up higher and the alley is down low. If there are already erosion problems in the alley,there is a further potential impact from the house. Sharratt indicated they are basically taking the existing retaining wall on the east side and for the most part eliminating that. They are also proposing to raise the basement floor level starting with the existing grade and to raise the ceiling height in the basement by two and a half to three feet. Sharratt indicated they will also be eliminating the retaining wall on the east side. On the west side against the alley,there will be a retaining wall that goes to a maximum height of four feet and then dissipate. Sharratt indicated they are basically taking the retaining wall from the east side and placing it on the west side. Schoenzeit asked where the existing grade is. Sharratt pointed out the location of the existing grade on the overhead. The existing grade is at the top of the driveway and not the bottom. Schoenzeit asked what the total height of the building is. Sharratt stated the building is within the City's height restrictions. Levang asked why the deck cannot be reduced five feet so it fits without encroaching into the setback. Sharratt stated if the deck were reduced any further, it would become a nonfunctional deck. Schoenzeit commented the deck could be put on the backside of the house rather than encroaching into the setback. Curtis noted the patio is currently in that area. _._ Page 7 __ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Sharratt stated if the deck is located in that area,they would be up higher and not able to see what is going on in the yard. The applicants have two little children and they would like to be able to watch them from the deck. In addition,they would have a view of the lake through the railings of the deck. Schoenzeit asked if only the deck would encroach into the setback. Curtis indicated it would. Sharratt pointed out the 10-foot setback line and noted that the lot gets narrower the closer to the street you get. Lemke asked if the erosion in the alleyway area is a concern. Sharratt stated currently water flows perpendicular to the contour line, and that what is happening is that at the upper part of the lot the runoff is okay but then it changes further down the lot. Sharratt illustrated the area where the ground is eroding, and noted that the runoff is spilling over onto the applicants' land. In order to have a yard and proper drainage,they will need to address that at some point. Sharratt noted there are also a number of very large trees in that area and that there is only a very small path through that area. Thiesse asked if the applicants are comfortable with the house being parallel with the east property line. Sharratt stated if the Planning Commission recommends that,they would find it acceptable. Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Jim Cusack,4140 Highwood Road, stated he has resided at his property for the last 19 years and nine years he decided to build a new home. Cusack indicated he was required to comply with a number of regulations relating to hardcover and structural coverage as well as setbacks. Cusack stated he realizes that the Musgjerds have a very small buildable area and that he does not have a problem with the 10-foot setback on the alley side and maintaining the 10 feet to the neighbors to the east, but that it is unfair he will lose his entire view of the lake. Cusack stated when he constructed his home, he had built it so there was an upper deck that is utilized quite a bit in the summer. If the house is built as proposed, his view of the lake will completely disappear. Cusack indicated he invested heavily in his property in order to construct his new home in the Orono area. Cusack noted they maintained the setback from the street and conformed on hardcover and structural coverage. If this project goes forward as planned, Cusack stated he will not have a view of the lake. Cusack noted there are five other neighbors that live across the street from the lake and that there are approximately seven people who use the easement. The easement is typically used in the wintertime by ATVs and snowmobiles. Cusack noted there is a pretty defined path that goes down there and the area has been in that condition for the entire time he has lived there and it does not appear to be getting worse. Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. Page 8 ..._. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated whenever there is new construction being proposed,the Planning Commission should require the property owners meet as many of the City's regulations as possible. Schoenzeit indicated he would like to see a 10-foot setback given the fact that this is new construction. Thiesse asked what the rationale is for that. Schoenzeit stated the City is essentially giving them 25 feet of a required setback. Schoenzeit pointed out if the applicants were keeping the existing footprint,they would be allowed to continue to encroach, but that with new construction,the City has some opportunities to require them to meet the setbacks. Thiesse stated he likes the deck as proposed because it provides a good view of the lake and the alley. Thiesse stated in his view it is a perfect location for the deck. Currently there is a garage that sits right on the property line. The applicants will be moving that five feet away from the property line,which is an improvement. Leskinen indicated she is in agreement with Commissioner Thiesse and that a smaller deck would not be very functional. Leskinen stated this is a very challenging lot due to the steepness and that she does not have a problem with the proposal. If there was structure below the deck, Leskinen indicated she would have an issue with that. Leskinen noted the current home is a two-story home and asked how the new home will change the view for the neighbor across the street. Leskinen asked if the proposed home is considerably higher than the existing house. Curtis indicated it is. Sharratt stated the existing home is 2-1/2 stories and that the proposed roof pitch is a little bit steeper in order to create space up inside the roof. They are also raising the first floor up approximately four feet. Sharratt indicated he did not do an overlay of the existing house onto the proposed house but that he could provide that if requested. Landgraver noted the applicant would like to take advantage of the wooded area across the alley but pointed out that it is a developable lot and that at some point in the future someone could build in that area. Levang expressed a concern with the impact on the neighbor's view. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission cannot tell someone they cannot construct on their property because someone has a view from across the street. Thiesse stated moving the house over 10 feet and providing that access allows a larger view. Thiesse stated in his view the neighbor will be able to see the lake between the houses. Cusack stated what is going to happen is the pitch on the roof is going to change and it will be a straight wall that runs down and parallel to the house to the east. Cusack stated due to the way his house is sighted,he will not be able to see over the top anymore. Thiesse noted Mr.Cusack currently does not have a view over the city property or the property to the west due to the large trees. _.__....—. Page 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Cusack indicated they can see through the canopy. Curtis noted the City has no regulations to protect the view of the lake from an off lake property. Schoenzeit indicated he is in agreement with that. Schoenzeit stated if the setback was in question,that would be a different issue,but the sight line from a non lakeshore property is not protected. Thiesse stated by rotating the house, it provides a better view for the neighbor across the street since the area is now opened up more. Thiesse asked if the City is looking at doing some remediation at the bottom of the hill,whether that would be incorporated now or whether that would be something that would be addressed in the future. Thiesse noted a retaining wall may be required. Curtis stated the property owners should work with the City on that and that if a variance becomes necessary,they will need to come back. Curtis indicated she does not want to incorporate anything now without knowing what the solution to the problem will be. Thiesse stated he does not want the applicants to have to come back and request a variance for a small amount of hardcover. Curtis indicated that is something the City Council could address. Schoenzeit asked if the retaining walls would be counted as hardcover under the new ordinance. Curtis indicated they would be counted as hardcover. Landgraver commented he can envision in a heavy downpour that that area could turn into a pipeline down to the lake and that the retaining wall will help with the drainage. Landgraver indicated he is in agreement with the 10-foot setback. Schoenzeit stated the question comes down to whether they prefer the massing on the lake or on the side. Thiesse asked if there is anything stopping the property owners from dropping columns directly down if the deck is approved. Thiesse stated he would like the applicants to not cantilever off the house as proposed and to actually drop posts down. Curtis stated the Planning Commission can require that as part of the approval. Thiesse stated he would like to allow them to have vertical support underneath the deck. Leskinen asked if that could be converted into an enclosed structure at some point. Thiesse commented that would be true of almost any structure. Curtis stated if the Planning Commission is going to allow the cantilevered deck because it is cantilevered and it is not going to have structure below or a screen porch above, the Planning Commission could incorporate certain conditions into their motion and those will be contained in the resolution if the Council agrees with that recommendation. Page 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 17,2012 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit noted the envelope is five feet if approved as is and that they should expect it to be used in different ways unless it is specified that it cannot be. Thiesse moved,Schwingler seconded,to recommend approval of Application#12-3575,Scott and Melissa Musgjerd,4156 Highwood Road,as proposed,granting of a lot area variance,a lot width variance,side yard and side-street setback variances,and a hardcover variance in the 75-250 foot zone,with the understanding that there will be a setback of 10 feet on the eastern side of the property and allowing the deck on the west side a5-foot encroachment,subject to complying with the City Engineer's recommendations and per Staffs recommendation that total hardcover not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 5. #12-3576 JOHN AND SHERRY GORMAN,3585 FREDERICK STREET,VARIANCE, 7:27 P.M.- 7:58 P.M. John and Sherry Gorman,Applicants,were present. Curtis stated the applicants are requesting a hardcover variance to allow the construction of a 3-stall garage and front porch additions to the home. The proposed additions will be completely within the 75- 250 foot hardcover zone. With concurrent proposed driveway hardcover removals,the 75-250 foot zone hardcover will decrease from 48.2 percent to 46.9 percent. Structural coverage is proposed to increase from 10 percent to 14.7 percent. The existing home was constructed in 1964 and has been remodeled a number of times over the past 50 years. The applicants are requesting a hardcover variance in order to convert the existing garage space into living space and construct a new, attached approximate 26' by 24' 3-stall garage with living space above. Because the property currently has 48.2 percent hardcover,which exceeds the allowed level within the 75-250 foot zone, and because the proposal will not achieve the allowed level of 25 percent,a hardcover variance is required. In addition,the applicants are proposing to reduce hardcover in part by removing the loop portion of the driveway. However,the proposed hardcover levels still far exceed the code allowed 25 percent or 3,601 square feet. As the Planning Commission is aware,the City is about to adopt new hardcover regulations, which would classify this property as a Tier 1 lot and would afford this property 25 percent of the entire lot area or 5,296 square feet. At 6,756 square feet,the applicants' proposal exceeds this level by 1,460 square feet. Sherry Gorman,applicant, stated they purchased the property in December of 2008 and one of their concerns is lack of storage. Being that it is a lake home and there is a pool in the back yard,they have a two-car garage but they have more than two vehicles and a lot of boating equipment in addition to the pool equipment. The original intent of the project was just to add the three-car garage but it has blossomed into more than that because it became clear that some adjustments would need to be made on the home as far as the roofline. Gorman indicated they are willing to make the investment into their home to make those adjustments. They are adding some new lines basically to the front of the house, which will improve the street appeal for the neighbors and the resale of the home. Curtis displayed a picture of the existing home and a picture of the proposed home with a three-car garage. Page 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #12-3574 DALE GUSTAFSON WITH GUSTAFSON DESIGN,INC., ON BEHALF OF CHRIS PATNODE, 1430 CHERRY PLACE, Continued) Rahn stated the issue is the fact that it is not a straight stairway. Rahn asked whether a variance would be required if they decided to add a lockbox at 20 square feet. Curtis indicated it would not require a variance. Rahn commented he also wanted to ensure that the applicants were not being charged two$700 fees prior to approving the application. Curtis stated the Staff has done an analysis and there is a breakdown of what the City incurs to process various applications. Rahn asked if a conditional use permit request should be on the same application as a variance application. Curtis indicated there is a different notification requirement for each of these applications and they need to be kept separate. Rahn asked if a variance application was completed. Curtis stated to her knowledge they have a variance application on file. Rahn moved,Printup seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO.6173,a Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit and Hardcover Variance per Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1282,78- 1286,and 78-1288, Christopher Patnode, 1430 Cherry Place. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD— VARIANCES Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to construct a new residence on the property. Due to the size, shape and orientation of the property,the applicants are requesting lot area, lot width, and side street setback variances in order to construct the proposed 1,580 square foot home. The Planning Commission held the public hearing for this application prior to the adoption of the new hardcover regulations. At that time a 75-250 foot zone hardcover variance to allow 37 percent hardcover was being requested. Using the gross lot area,the proposed hardcover is at 24.2 percent. The applicants' hardcover now conforms to the revised hardcover regulations for a Tier 1 lot. At the Planning Commission it was discovered that there was a discrepancy in the applicant's survey and the architect's plans. The Planning Commission voted 7-0,based on the architect's plans,to approve a motion recommending the following: 1. Approval of a side street setback variance to allow the home to encroach into the west side, street setback consistent with the applicants' architectural drawings,resulting in a setback between 10—7.6 feet from the west,side lot line; Page 7 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) 2. Approval of a side, street setback variance to allow the proposed deck to be set back 5 feet from the west side street lot line; 3. Approval of lot width and lot area variances. Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested lot width and lot area variances. Staff recommends approval of a side street setback ranging from 7.6 feet to 10 feet from the west lot line where a 35-foot side street setback is required. This is justified based on the minimum width garage proposed and the narrowness of the lot. However, Staff continues to recommend that the deck be redesigned to meet a 10- foot setback from the alley lot line rather than the 3.5 to 4-foot setback proposed or the 5-foot setback recommended by the Planning Commission. Curtis noted the applicants have provided a revised survey and plans. Staff has not had an opportunity to review the plans in detail but expects all engineering issues to be addressed prior to drafting a resolution. McMillan asked what size the deck would be if it was reduced down to meet a 10-foot setback. Rahn stated it appears to be 5.5 feet. Curtis indicated there would be more width at the lake end but at the top of the deck there would be 5 to 5.5 feet. Curtis stated the applicants can speak to the reasons for the proposed design. Rahn stated his personal belief is that these homes that are next to fire lanes have a tendency to encroach into the fire lane, and to allow a brand new home to encroach is not the right path to go down. Rahn stated in his view the fire lanes are underutilized throughout the City and that the four borders for each fire lane should be identified. Rahn commented it could be that the City ends up receiving complaints from the property owner if people are down at the beach and they have a deck that is close to that area. Rahn stated he is in agreement with Staff and sees no reason for the deck to encroach. Michael Sharratt,Designer,stated they started with a very nonconforming situation with a home that is located 2.5 feet from the east property and a garage that is 0 feet from the side alley Iine. Sharratt commented he is saddened that applicants are seldom congratulated for doing a good job,which is what has been done here. The applicants are asking for the side yard setback to accommodate the deck. The deck has been cantilevered so it will not touch the ground. The reason for the variance request is that without it,the deck would end up being seven feet wide, which basically does not allow for a table and chairs. Sharratt indicated they do have an option to place the deck in front of the great room windows on the first floor,but that when you have a lot that is roughly 40 feet above the lake,you would not be able to see the shoreline if you were sitting on the deck. The applicants have small children and would like to be able to see the shoreline and yard,which is the reason the deck was located on the side of the house. Sharratt stated they felt that a cantilevered structure would be an acceptable encroachment given all the other nonconformities that have been resolved. Sharratt noted they are under the 25 percent hardcover limit and under the structural coverage limit. The plan also exceeds the street setback and meets the east side setback. Sharratt noted the home is only 23'/6"wide and that their setback variance seems like a reasonable request. Page 8 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) Sharratt commented he is not sure if the entire Council has walked the fire lane but that it is extremely steep. The water currently travels perpendicular to grade and then starts to turn and eventually comes right off the alley across this property,which has resulted in a washout area. A survey from 20 years ago shows that the washout area was not there and he is not sure how it developed over the years. The washout issue has been brought up to Staff and the applicants are willing to work with the City in an effort to deal with the problem. The fire lane over the years has predominantly been used as a snowmobile path and not many people walk down to the lake using the fire lane. The alleyway is also overgrown with trees. The street is 41 feet above the lake and it is quite a steep walk down the fire lane. Sharratt noted the neighbor across the street had a concern about constructing a bigger house on this lot. That owner would like this house to be between 8 and10 feet away from the property line. Sharratt stated locating the house eight feet off the property line would be an option and would allow a bigger deck on the other side. The neighbor on the other side of the street raised some concerns that he was going to lose his view of the lake. Sharratt noted that neighbor's view will actually be widened. Sharratt stated they have attempted to address all the concerns of the neighbors and the City and that they are proposing to construct a much nicer home than what currently exists. Franchot asked what the likelihood is that the alley would ever be used for anything other than its current use. Struve indicated based on its location,the likelihood is that it will not be used for much beyond how it is currently being used. Franchot stated in his view this is a reasonable request and that there is open land between the two lots and that the effect of being too close to the neighbors is not a real issue. Franchot stated with the cantilevered deck,he does not see any safety issues. Franchot stated part of the City Council's role is to assist its citizens in having the best home they can have without it causing harm to the lake or the neighbors. Franchot stated the other concerns raised are simply possibilities and that in his view they do not rise to the level where the application should be denied. Printup commented it would be easy to allow a deck but questioned where it would stop. Printup stated a similar request could happen to the neighboring property or the property down the road. Printup commented it seems that these situations have come up a number of times in the past and asked whether that would leave the City exposed to future variance requests of a similar nature. Franchot asked whether a precedent would be created by granting this variance. Mattick stated each of the applications stands on their own. Future applicants will likely look at variances that the Council has approved and that it is a question that will be asked. Dennis Walsh, 1354 Rest Point Circle,commended Mike Sharratt for his design given the tough nature of the lot. Walsh stated the City owes it to its residents to allow them to build houses that are saleable and that they should grant some leeway on narrow lots. Walsh stated in his view that shows the residents that Page 9 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) the City is willing to help them by granting small incremental changes in order to allow a useful deck. Walsh commented a deck in the front tends to destroy the view of the home. Bremer asked how the plans the City Council received tonight are different from what was before the Planning Commission. Sharratt indicated the deck was originally designed to be 12' x 17'. The applicants late last week received an engineering review letter and that they have attempted to draft a response to his concerns. Sharratt indicated he is in agreement that the driveway was too steep at 11 percent. To lower the grade of the driveway, some risers have been placed on the first floor with steps going down from the garage into the house. Raising the garage results in a 2.8' foot drop from the edge of the road and creates a 6.3 percent slope. The basement floor elevation rose by six inches. The reason the house can only be raised six inches is to meet the 50 percent rule. McMillan asked if the deck would be 12'x 7' if it were to meet the 10-foot setback. Sharratt indicated it would be 7' x 17'. McMillan commented it would still be a fairly substantial deck but that it would be rather narrow. McMillan noted there is not a stairway coming off the deck. Sharratt indicated there is not a deck stairway and that they have to go back into the house to go out on the yard. Franchot asked if the setback is denied,whether they would move the house to the east two feet to get a little more space. Sharratt indicated they did not get anything in writing from the neighbor but that he had indicated he would not be opposed to eight feet. Franchot asked if moving the house would be the reaction of the applicants to the City Council turning down the setback variance. Sharratt stated it would likely trigger that design change. Franchot noted the other consequence of moving the house is that it would make it closer to the property line on the other side where there is actual structure. Bremer noted the City Council would need to approve the house relocation since it would also require a variance. Sharratt indicated there is no buildable area on the site that would meet all the setbacks. Curtis pointed out they would need a variance to enclose above the deck but that they would not require a variance to enclose the area underneath the deck. Bremer asked if the intention is to enclose the area underneath the deck. Page 10 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) Sharratt stated due to the steepness on the alley side, they cannot dig that area out. The applicants would be agreeable with saying that there will never be a screened porch and that they would be willing to put that into the title or deed. McMillan indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Rahn and Staff on this application and that a 10-foot setback is appropriate. McMillan stated part of the reason the City changed the hardcore ordinance is that they did not want to get into a situation where the setbacks were disregarded. McMillan commented there has to be some sort of parameters on setbacks and that the 10 feet setback being recommended by Staff is a good compromise. Printup moved,Rahn seconded,Application#12-3575,Scott and Melissa Musgjerd,4156 Highwood Road,to accept Staff's recommendation. Sharratt asked if the City Council is suggesting that the design revision is a requirement in order for them to proceed. McMillan stated they can enclose the deck as part of the house and that it is not a necessity to have a deck. McMillan stated the deck has to comply with the 10-foot setback. McMillan stated the City Council can either vote on the application tonight or the applicants can request that their application be tabled. Mr.Musgjerd indicated they are supposed to close on the property November 13th. Curtis noted the next City Council meeting is October 22nd. Mattick stated no one is requiring the deck. Sharratt stated unless they are willing to redesign the home to make all the space interior or place the deck on the lakeside,those are their only options. Rahn noted on the alley side they are required to have a 35-foot setback and Council would allow a variance on the garage end of the house,but on the lake side of the home the majority of the Council is agreeable with a 10-foot setback instead of 3.5 feet. McMillan stated she considers the garage to be a hardship and that a deck is not a hardship. Rahn asked if there is an average lakeshore setback for this property. Curtis indicated the average lakeshore setback line is shown on the overhead. Sharratt asked if the motion prevails if that means they need to maintain the footprint of the house. Bremer stated the answer is no. McMillan stated the deck footprint would have to be reduced to comply with the 10-foot setback. Page 11 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) Mrs. Musgjerd indicated they also have concerns about the fire lane. If you visit the site,this lot is basically the entrance to the lake off of the fire lane. Anybody that snowmobiles or walks their dog down to the lake,has to come through this lot and basically go through that little beach area. If you go down by the shore and would like to access the lake, it is about a four foot drop down to the lake. Rahn stated the City Council does not know what the future use of that path will be and that it is conceivable that the fire lane is improved at some point. Mrs. Musgjerd stated in her view they are being penalized. McMillan stated she is not aware of this lot being used to access the lake by the public. Mrs.Musgjerd stated that was the whole point of why they came to the City and asked to work with them to make the whole area better. McMillan stated obviously people are using private property rather than the fire lane to access the lake and that perhaps that area could be blocked off by the property owner. Mattick stated he is not sure whether a fence could be erected within the 0-75 foot zone but that the City can help steer people down the right-of-way rather than on to this property. Mrs.Musgjerd stated they have done everything they can to make the house compliant with the City's regulations. Musgjerd noted the new residence could be constructed in the same place as the existing house but that they are attempting to benefit the neighbors by relocating it. Musgjerd stated she had hoped there would be a little bit of give and take since they have improved the lot overall. Musgjerd noted they do not have time to redesign the house and that they have spent a lot of money designing a house. McMillan commented the City Council has to follow the codes whenever possible. Mrs. Musgjerd stated there is not a big enough buildable area on the lot without some variances. Rahn noted the Council is agreeable to a 25-foot variance to the setback. Mrs. Musgjerd commented that basically the existing house will rot because no one will want to purchase it. Musgjerd stated in her view this is not a big house when you compare it with the other homes in the area. McMillan stated the City will not be able to resolve the issue tonight of people going on private property rather than the fire lane to access the lake and that tonight they are looking at the proposed house and the setbacks. The City Council can either vote on it or table the application to allow them to redesign their plans to comply with the 10-foot setback. McMillan stated they would have two weeks to redesign their plans but that she is not sure what the City can do in two weeks to resolve the fire lane issue. Rahn commented that would be a police issue. Sharratt pointed out they are not asking for resolution of the fire lane use at this time. Page 12 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) McMillan asked if they would like their application tabled. David Beeker,Builder, stated he understands the concern for setting a precedent,which is why things are put in writing. The City Council has to use their best judgment on each individual application and that they would not be setting any type of precedent by granting this variance. If the application does not go through today,the other option is that someone else will buy the property and remodel the existing house. Beeker noted the garage is sitting on the fire lane and is three feet away from the house to the east. The City has an opportunity today to change that and improve the situation for the neighbors. Both neighbors are in support of the project. Beeker reiterated the Council has to take advantage of the opportunity to make things better tonight and that the applicants are not asking for very much given the small size of the house. Beeker commented they are taking the property and making it better than what exists. Bremer asked why they are opposed to a lakeward deck. Sharratt stated if it were a fairly level lot,that would be ideal,but given the topography of the lot,they would not be able to see the shoreline or yard if the deck is on the lake side of the house. Bremer commented they typically see people doing the exact opposite of what is being proposed tonight. Bremer asked if there is a reason why they proposed 12 feet as opposed to 10 feet. Bremer indicated she is basically in agreement with the rest of the application and that she would hate to see something that would be a benefit to the neighborhood go away over what appears to be a minor issue. Bremer asked what the difference is between a 12-foot deck and a 10-foot deck,especially when there are no stairs going down. Sharratt stated it is not the difference between a 12-foot deck and a 10-foot deck but rather the difference between 12 and 6.5 or 7 feet. Sharratt stated the issue with the front deck is you would look through a railing and you would not be able to see down to the yard. There will be a patio on the lower level and they would like to be able to see the kids and the lakeshore from the deck. In addition,a 7-foot deck is not functional for a table and four chairs. Bremer commented in the great majority of these cases it is her instinct that they should hold to the 10-foot setback. Bremer indicated she was hoping the applicants would have said, okay, six feet is too skinny but I could go to 10 feet, and that she would be much more supportive of that. Bremer stated the applicants have to be mindful of all the other applications that come before the City Council and that they are dealing with the concern that the City cannot anticipate what the future use of the fire lane will be. Bremer stated in her view a 10-foot setback is ideal but that she is not in favor of granting a 3.5 foot setback or a 5-foot setback and would have liked to see some type of compromise. McMillan noted if the alleyway were a house instead,they would be requesting a 10-foot setback. McMillan asked why a 35-foot setback is required. Curtis indicated it is considered a side street,which is the reason for the 35-foot setback. Page 13 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) Bremer stated that question focuses on how far would you let someone go in that circumstance and in her view the number is not three feet in that situation. McMillan commented the City has seen a considerable amount of encroachment on fire lanes in the past and that it is a legitimate issue. Sharratt noted the garage is currently on the property line. McMillan asked if they would like their application tabled or to have Council vote on the application. Sharratt indicated his clients would be willing to reduce the setback to 10 feet. Printup indicated he will rescind his motion and that he would be willing to make a new motion to table the application. Previous motion rescinded. Printup stated they have already heard a number of times that everyone is agreeable with the house and garage except for the deck. Curtis asked whether the Council would be agreeable if Staff brought a draft resolution reflecting approval of the revised proposal that they can either approve or deny at their next meeting since the applicants do not have sufficient time before their closing to come to a meeting in November. Rahn stated if the Council has a specific number in mind,they should just say it. Bremer stated she is not sure if that number is accurate and that it is difficult to tell from the survey. Sharratt stated the setback would be 5.5' on the street side of the deck and approximately 7'to 7.5' on the lakeside. McMillan asked if they would like a deck that is wide enough to accommodate a table and four chairs. Sharratt stated the deck is rectangular and that there will probably be a 4-foot table and chairs in one area. Sharratt stated if they went to the full 10 foot setback, it would result in a 5.5 foot deck at that location. Rahn noted if the deck is extended beyond the house, it could be wider but it would block the view of the neighbor. Rahn stated the City Council is not going to get into redesigning the plan tonight. Franchot moved,Bremer seconded,Application#12-3575,Scott and Melissa Musgjerd,4156 Highwood Road,approval of lot width and lot area variances,and approval of a 5.75 foot setback on the west lot line. McMillan noted the deck would be reduced by two feet. Bremer indicated the deck would be 34 square feet. Page 14 of 21 ' MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD, 4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD, Continued) VOTE: Ayes 2,Nays 3,Rahn,Printup and McMillan Opposed. Printup moved,Rahn seconded,Application#12-3575,Scott and Melissa Musgjerd,4156 Highwood Road,to accept Planning Staffs recommendation approving lot width and lot area variances and a 10-foot setback from the west lot line. VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 2,Bremer and Franchot Opposed. *9. A#12-3577 CITY OF ORONO—AMEND ZONING CODE SECTION 78-72,LOTS OF RECORDS—ORDINANCE NO. 95,THIRD SERIES Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 95,Third Series,An Ordinance Amending Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code Regarding Lots of Record. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT Struve reported there was a ribbon cutting ceremony for Crystal Bay Park earlier this evening. The park appears to be getting more use by the residents. Struve stated as it relates to Orono Orchard Road,the majority of Phase I has been paved and work is progressing between Fox Street and County Road 15. Struve indicated the contractor has done a very good job thus far. McMillan asked how the mill and overlay is going. Struve indicated they have completed the manhole adjustments and that they were delayed approximately one week due to some other work. The final mill and overlay should be completed by the end of October. McMillan asked if he is happy with the surface coating. Struve indicated he is happy with the coating. Struve stated all the streets have been swept and that the contractor just needs to pick up his signs. *10. PAY REQUEST NO.3, ORONO ORCHARD ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to approve Pay Request No.3 for the contractor Minger Construction,Inc.,in the amount of$622,950.09 for the Orono Orchard Road Reconstruction Project. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. *11. PAY REQUEST NO.3—CARMAN BAY SHORELINE RESTORATION PROJECT Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to approve Pay Request No.3 for the contractor Sunram Construction,Inc.,in the amount of$10,710.54 for the Carmen Bay Shoreline Restoration Project. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. Page 15 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 22,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT *5. #11-3531 LORI GHERARDI ON BEHALF OF WOLVERTON PLACE,LCC,4550 WOLVERTON PLACE—EXTENSION TO FILE FINAL SUBDIVISION—RESOLUTION NO. 6176 Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6176,a Resolution Granting a Six-Month Extension to the Effective Period of Subdivision Approval Established Per Resolution No.6136. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. *6. #12-3575 SCOTT AND MELISSA MUSGJERD,4156 HIGHWOOD ROAD—VARIANCE, RESOLUTION NO.6177 Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO.6177,a Resolution Granting Variances to Orono Municipal Code Sections 78-330, for the property located at 4156 Highwood Road. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. *7. #12-3578 DENNIS AND DEBORAH KRUMP,25 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH— VARIANCE,RESOLUTION NO.6178 Bremer moved,Franchot seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6178,a Resolution Granting a Variance to Orono Municipal Code Section 78-395,for the property located at 25 Stubbs Bay Road North. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT Struve reported that all roads identified in the City's pavement management plan for improvement this year have been milled,street base repairs have been completed,the manholes have been adjusted,and paving will start tomorrow. The contractor still expects to complete the project by the end of the week. As it relates to the Orono Orchard Road project,the contractor is still finishing up some of the minor restorations in the area north of Fox Street. That work should also be completed relatively soon. Due to the lack of rain, sod conditions in the field are poor. The contractor has requested that they be allowed to place seed this fall rather than sod. If the seed does not grow next summer,they will replace it with sod next fall at no additional cost. Struve noted there are some people with irrigation systems close to the road that may have been damaged but those systems will be repaired. If the system has already been shut down for the season,they will be repaired next spring. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT McMillan thanked City Clerk Lin Vee for her work on putting together the City's recycling contract. McMillan noted she has also received a number of e-mails about the Council considering the banning of roosters. McMillan recommended that Staff put something on the City's website on the action taken by the City Council on that item. Gaffron indicated he would follow up with a website update. Page 4 of 7 RUN DATE:09/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 07-117-23 43 0007 38 07-117-23 44 0015 38 07-117-23 44 0029 DANIEL AND JANE HOUCK TRUST G W&J L APPLEBAUM ALEXANDER BURCH/JAMIE BURCH 1535 FAIRVIEW COTTAGE LA 4109 HIGHWOOD RD 4148 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 DANIEL E HOUCK GEORGE W/JOANNE L APPLEBAUM ALEXANDER C BURCH JANE HOUCK 4109 HIGHWOOD RD JAMIE L BURCH 1535 FAIRVIEW COTTAGE LA MOUND MN 55364 4148 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0008 38 07-117-23 44 0018 38 07-117-23 44 0030 ROBERT M EMFIELD TRUSTEE M P KOCH&N A MARK-KOCH J D CUSACK&C M GRACE 4203 NORTH SHORE DR 4149 HIGHWOOD RD 4140 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ROBERT M EMFIELD MARK KOCH&NANCY MARK-KOCH C GRACE&J CUSACK 27420 HICKORY BLVD 4149 HIGHWOOD RD 4140 HIGHWOOD RD BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0012 38 07-117-23 44 0019 38 07-117-23 44 0031 CITY OF ORONO S MUSGJERD&M MUSGJERD SCOTT G&CATHERINE ANDERSON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4156 HIGHWOOD RD 4132 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO SCOTT&MELISSA MUSGJERD SCOTT G&CATHERINE ANDERSON P O BOX 66 4156 HIGHWOOD RD 4132 HIGHWOOD ROAD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0033 38 07-117-23 44 0020 38 07-117-23 44 0037 T G BECKER/M SNYKER BECKER D M SMITH&R G SMITH TRS JAMES M CLEARY 1565 FAIRVIEW COTTAGE LA 4167 HIGHWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 TIMOTHY G BECKER DOUGLAS M&ROBAN G SMITH JAMES CLEARY MARY E SNYKER BECKER 4195 HIGHWOOD RD 4109 NORTH SHORE DR 1565 FAIRVIEW COTTAGE LANE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0009 38 07-117-23 44 0021 38 07-117-23 44 0038 F J SHIDEMAN&J H SHIDEMAN D M SMITH&R G SMITH TRS JAMES M CLEARY 4075 HIGHWOOD RD 4175 HIGHWOOD RD 4109 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FREDERICK J SHIDEMAN DOUGLAS M&ROBAN G SMITH JAMES CLEARY JACQUELINE H SHIDEMAN 4195 HIGHWOOD RD 4109 NORTH SHORE DR 7405 COVENTRY WAY MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 EDINA MN 55439 38 07-117-23 44 0010 38 07-117-23 44 0024 38 07-117-23 44 0039 TINA PROVETTO B P BOWEN&S M DOWNS JAMES M CLEARY 4079 HIGHWOOD RD 4190 HIGHWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 TINA PROVETTO B P BOWEN&S M DOWNS JAMES CLEARY 4079 HIGHWOOD RD 4190 HIGHWOOD RD 4109 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0011 38 07-117-23 44 0025 38 07-117-23 44 0046 F L JOHNSON&D L FOSS S A&J W RICHARDS II D L MCCAMMON&B A ORTALEZA 4091 HIGHWOOD RD 4182 HIGHWOOD RD 4191 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FREDERIC JOHNSON SARAH A&JOHN W RICHARDS II DANAH L MCCAMMON 4091 HIGHWOOD RD 4182 HIGHWOOD RD BARON A ORTALEZA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4191 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0012 38 07-117-23 44 0026 38 07-117-23 44 0075 ALONZO B SERAN III RICHARD BRECKE/SUSAN COCHRAN CITY OF ORONO 4099 HIGHWOOD RD 4174 HIGHWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 ALONZO B SERAN III RICHARD BRECKE CITY OF ORONO 4099 HIGHWOOD RD SUSAN COCHRAN P O BOX 66 MOUND MN 55364 4174 HIGHWOOD RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0013 38 07-117-23 44 0027 38 07-117-23 44 0083 GARY L GERMUNDSEN NORA R PASSE ERICK G&LAURIE S CELMS 4101 HIGHWOOD RD 4166 HIGHWOOD RD 1535 HIGHWOOD LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 GARY LAWRENCE GERMUNDSEN NORA R PASSE ERICK G&LAURIE S CELMS 4101 HIGHWOOD RD 4166 HIGHWOOD RD 1535 HIGHWOOD LA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0014 38 07-117-23 44 0028 38 07-117-23 44 0084 J J PETERSON&A K PETERSON JON LLOYD BAKKE JOHN W&ROBERTA J HENRICH 4105 HIGHWOOD RD 4150 HIGHWOOD RD 4125 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JASON J PETERSON JON L BAKKE JOHN W&ROBERTA J HENRICH ANELISE K PETERSON 4150 HIGHWOOD RD 4125 HIGHWOOD RD 4105 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 RUN DATE:09/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 07-117-23 44 0086 S SQUARED CAPITAL LLC 4104 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 S SQUARED CAPITAL LLC 261 SCHOOL AVE#240 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 07-117-23 44 0088 PHILLIP M OTTO 4116 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 PHILLIP M OTTO 4116 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0089 M WAFFENSMITH&D ABBOTT 4108 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 MATTHEW G WAFFENSMITH DENISE N ABBOTT 4108 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0093 MARI J GOODFELLOW 4175 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 MARI J GOODFELLOW 4175 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0095 R G SMITH&D M SMITH TRES 4195 HIGHWOOD RD ORONO MN 55364 ROBAN G&DOUGLAS M SMITH 4195 HIGHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 9/23/2019 P4118 ' 4196 1530 .£ 4215 4140 s ; _ ei 4209 t , !....:,'!-'....••rt,i4,-,-_?,,,,,i:,„.4:,7-7,7,-,.,_0,,„,,,,,,:,,,',,,,y 42G5 #191 04 ' 4064 4203 h1. 1535 �tjr,4141,440 , 40' 1, -141 � . 4109 dtrt i t4" 41tta a108 4104 * . 1565 r} 4 .. ail as!!`.: st 4150 .a *.y ;. t� 4132 4051 - W, : .--,.. 11. '.ryye� n xty •10 T! v 4109 1 �' t 'i-.;..-.K.:!#4 i-S;;F::f. .-1'--:,1,7:Ti:::-:,-,::!.::.:;' ... IP g 16r --,--....:7.:',4:',::" ;.; _ #tom }' ,.r �' `" . Y ti:' Fpy , af' / a v , + mss &- _ _�. . r'' at4 c: -� . . r T 'kms r.�r `_ 7:57,-,., * � - }^ ��-- ,;�,t jF�- ,,[3.,„,:,,,,,,r,..,:.„;.;.,:,-..,„_ . �:`��rf' rx ��y Y +����.�'` ;ice' i ` '-f-i.--.?..ti� � e r se,#, 'k: ,� , - .- T'f..y. #� .'+�� _.r_ c+-�r�."�x. : ,��..si�{�-x 1's. . Fart . ':��� `��,��',.:* - _— Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 4156 Highwood Road This data (i) s furnsned 'nS IS' with norepresernationasto completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnishedwithnowarrardy of any khd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shat not be liable injury or loss resulting from Ws data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGlSOffice 3006th Street South,Minneapdis,MN55487/gs.infoi hennepin.us R GI R R O R Z Frlr II r CI ^, k `y ,% ..,--,,,,,;.,-'%:i.,,,.=.,-,- ' _ l t kitl-A4P-Fitg-4temlbfilitr&Art,, ,14,:j„jf""fit:- ',,, ,,,-,- - . ! ,!! __- ' _ , ,._34.:A,,,..31. F'4 +, Cv ' ys € _- _ � �+Yy {t . W t z c aA i=. L _ k rry Afkt Fi: - rra>ia 5:� '..,-,;*--.411.:7i, r. s. ' ' s __ �_ r R ^x ;yo- x ti {, ,.- 9 Y- 0,414,,..:211,-,.:14-1:!!!-,4„-4,;, 4rv~`t 1-. N" �f:, �' ' fi{ *40 '•fit _e- x- _ - ;. ",4t.-.` `-: as +":- .. -,-.*;-...4.-1'...: :-", „t 1. - •; x l - > F r^ ` '�,s 'k`.` : it tt�' "..' . _ to -•i.. 1. r "c fi 3 '--,•-_ _` ”` �^ rt g :.. : r *"_ RooveCii�uS ;x • r a 3 a� Ota r r _ IF Resolution No 4795 /1 � ''' erF granted permission for 1. _ '' use of the alley for 1 ' driveway purposes /i', I ' 'F1 associated with the ,A ,., property at 4051 Highwood Road. '--- _ F a n:I 1 1 r • 4 ♦� 1 I 11 iii 1 4t .,, ' .Qct , 1 , ty I C: I „ ; t 41t. ' I I-I I,:\\,.'C 5 y 1 / P ,NIII �_•-� 0.iti\-\ ;7O gyp- • CITY of ORONO '\ Attr - 40,;/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL \��kESH04NO. 479 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PERMISSION FOR A DRIVEWAY ON A PLATTED ALLEY IN THE HIGHWOOD LAKE MINNETONKA PLAT WHEREAS, Alexander G.. Vongries and Edith A. Vongries as trustees of the Alexander G. Vongries Trust, an undivided %2 interest in and to Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1420 County of Hennepin;and Edith A.Vongries and Alexander G.Vongries as trustees of the Edith A. Vongries Trust, an undivided V2 interest in and to Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1420 County of Hennepin. (hereinafter"the applicants")are owners of the property located at 4051 Highwood Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1420 (hereinafter"the subject property") WHEREAS, the applicants have requested permission from the City of Orono to continue the use of an existing driveway located on a 20 foot wide platted public alley that is located between 4051 Highwood Road and 4075 Highwood Road in the Highwood Lake Minnetonka Plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. The Highwood Lake Minnetonka Plat was established in 1917 and the streets and alleys in the plat were dedicated for public use forever. 2. The subject property is adjacent to a 20 foot wide platted alley in the Highwood Lake Minnetonka plat. 3. The residence on the subject property was constructed sometime prior to1970 with a single car garage that had driveway access from Highwood Road. Since this time, there have been several building permits issued for renovation and remodeling of the residence. 4. On October 21, 1983, the City of Orono issued building permit number 5152 for removal of the existing single car garage and construction of a new three car garage. The survey with the building permit shows the garage doors facing the platted alley with a 10-foot setback from the property line to the front of the garage. Page 1 of 5 \\ (iO _ O`, ,.`` Ali CITY of ORONO ' ' ,1 - S'' '/ JA�'rilif4. OS/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 5. The location of the garage doors with a 10-foot setback from the edge of the platted alley definitively shows that a portion of the driveway needs to be located on the alley to provide access to the garage. A survey of the alley that was completed in 2002 for a proposed storm water project shows a portion of the driveway for the subject property on the platted alley. 6. The driveway shown on the platted alley is an appropriate use, as one of the functions of platted streets and alleys is to provide access to private property within the plat. 7. The driveway on the platted alley does not adversely impact or create an obstruction for public use of the platted alley, as the public can easily travel across the driveway to access the alley. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above,the Orono City Council hereby grants approval for the continuation of the use of a portion of the platted alley for driveway access to a garage located on the subject property, at 4051 Highwood Road subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing driveway can remain in use across the platted alley as long as the existing house and garage remain on the property.In the event of future removal of the house and garage for redevelopment of the property, the City reserves the right to terminate the use of the driveway on the alley and require driveway access from Highwood Road to serve the property. 2. Maintenance and repair of the driveway are the sole responsibility of the property owner. 3. The sole purpose of City approval of the driveway across the platted alley is to allow access to the subject property which is a legitimate use of a platted alley. City approval of the driveway on the alley expressly does not infer or grant any additional property rights to the subject property over the platted alley. Page 2 of 5 „... . • , --.4 o.4-„N ,o � , o �� _ .d p, CITY of ORONO ,,., �� '1.4- :041; � �G/�` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL - ESH NO. 4 7 9 6 4. Approval does not create any obstruction or restriction on the public use of the platted alley. 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of April 2002. ATTEST: `, 6 1 �/n--ittc,t--6: 2 & (c / ,may) Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor aki-a-4A-41-52A--E 6 Alexander G. Vongries E�Z�� Edith A. Vongries ;J Trustee, Alexander G. Vongries Trust Trustee,Alexander G. Vongries Trust ,-,ak tr J aoi„,,, / t-te .G,-7of iCtomAlexan er G.. Vongries Edith A. Vongries 9 Trustee, Edith A. Vongries Trust Trustee, Edith A. Vongries Trust STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of April,2002 by Barbara A.Peterson,Mayor of the City of Orono,a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. No : Public _. Page 3 of at,. - JACKIE YOUNG w, P. 1P2c. NOTARY PUBUC-MINNESOT, Ary Commission Expires Jan.31,2005 (' �w r ---.--/-i1/4, o4i. (040A\1 �K ,_ bio- ; CITY of ORONO �� ��lie�i� G�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL E NO. 4 7 9S STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this ,-?L,� )day of /fir i / , 20 (20-- by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL DODGE S c.„., _ ,_z,„„„,.....,,,,,,---,-....-_,-_,--_,--- --..., , t ��C� z G z C_' faG'c NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNE."OTA ti My Commission .31,2005 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this..6--117 day of /v7 , -/ , 20 023-Alexander G. Vongries and Edith A. Vongries. Trustees of the Alexander G. Vongries Trust. personally appeared before me, who is personally known to me ,/whose identity I proved on the basis of /77A1 D 1--- whose whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation , a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. ---727a , Notary Pub , " MARY ANN JOHNSON ti ti `x '. :�; NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA R. '1.' � ..�,: My Cortmissbn Expires Jan.31,2005 Page 4 of 5 _ _ (:v. 0.iii.'-- \ (0 t , ( It:: ; : , � CITY of ORONO ��� G~/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL \� to ''1ESH.0�`�� NO. 4 7 9 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 , Alexander G. Vongries and Edith A. Vongries,Trustees of the Edith A. Vongries Trust. personally appeared before me, who is personally known to me whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation , a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 • ''..,-::::•;,:j,,(7---:—. .-- ' . . . . , . ..... _ . . . . , , 1I •- - .,, RE #1 on the Map: ..- . .‘• 3309007 • -• la 898 iwit5Y'',-: - • ‘,, : ,..,,• r.. ._..' . ,-.. '- - - 'Mote of Minnesota) • ' • ' - 4,,- 1 . • County of Hennepin) , • . • ,,, . . .• , .. .,.., ' . ' , - -•:_:=->"--41. ---'.'- 1-r-Nc - ij-:4,.-!-. 7,--, • — : .,!. dertitioetti : . • • • -'t,'-,'' : -. • •:''-':: . ' • ' . - ..• , , I,tha:undereigned,Clerk of the Village of Orono,County'of Hennepin, i,•;', .,- State of Minneeots,do hereby certify that I have compared the paper .', I , , . . • .. i Writingof the vacation notice attached-tolthin certifloate,with the I, ' .'original'Vecating the 16 foot right-of-way in Rest Point Park,Henneph „..,._. County,Minneeota,paseed by the Counoll of the Village Of-Ortiiito,dourity \ . . . . , -ofHennepin,State of Minnemota,on'the 14th day of Auguet,I98I,ae the same appears of record In the maid Clerk's offioe,at the Village Hall . • of the Village of'OronoiHennepin Cpinty,Minneeota,and find the name 4 '' / to be a true and correct copy thereof. IN 'TESTIMONY.WHERE0P,I have hereunto net my hand and affixed the seal of said Village of Orono at the Village of Orono,in said County, , 4 this 14th day of Auguet,I98I. • . . I .,.. 4P ,,---/i , .... ,.... . Villeg Clerk. ' .';'.;:444-„t4-,''-...:,f,-;4 . ::::;'::•/, ?3•7--;=:-0,:- . . .; :•=.;.. i-4,-,,;(--:;.r,,,,,:•,:i.i'Fg, . . ' _-.•:'.., •,..J':-,...:-.,,;,•!-,-,.s •- . ,A.,..?,),..y•:.•:;...,.."•• . .,..:•' =-.: ,..,;,,,,:s: . . . . . . . • • . • . • . . I . •, .... . • . . , . * . . . . , . . , . . . i J • . . • , k) . . . ,. , • . . . . . , . . . . • . - • , • . . ! . , , • I . ; • . . • I t' • . ...-- ., . . . ' ,;•..:::::.- : ,--' ' - . '. •,:.'.:;, ,.- ' ' . . •a . '. . • • , • • ._�blsc 8�8 fluke • - --- ------- ------�� ..._.. .�..�� f10D11 - 'Village-of Orono, 1'-: Hennepin County,Minneeot'a. •�, • - Vaoation Notioe- Vacating the 16 foot public right-of-way lying between'the Northeasterly line of Lot IO,and the Southwesterly linle of Lot 9,Rest Point Park,Seotion 7 Township II?,Range 23,Village of Orono. ?Yhereae;the owners of land abutting on the above described right-of-way, have signed a petition dated July I0,I96I,for the vacation of said ,right-of-way; and Whexeas,pureuant to said petition,a public hearing on said petition was held on the 84th day of July I96I,before the Village Counoil of the Village of Orono County of Hennepin state of Uinneeota,upon direction of Council of said Village of Orono,and after due and proper published notice of said hoaxing; and Now therefore be it,pueol d ly the C un. , , of the Village of zono,County of Hennepin,9(ate o:ir8 otterthat e • ve mentioned right, and c) hereby is va ell-aiAs i�Ltp on r own in looatior deeo abed in • • first peragrg04 (no•8 - , Be •LL further ¢ I"�` � n �p }�' tribd e tis�L ase ti rvo y of this notice she for�reoord reit e iB to g Dee J 'd for said County of/HSDrf pi Stale of Minns of . m 3 { o - Cr a C"..11 Paeged by the` ou S of then V1.1179ofr g.no this I4th day. AOgtiet,I BI. 0 4 JJ� H.R.Roes,Mayor. • AttbgL I `il ni''d.E• • ohnnon,Clerk. 1• f`,' • - o• Nf, rr• M• 8'7 00rn 1 J • a:, Y s rritA• Filed for record on the'18 day of Sep AD 1961 at 2140 o'olook P.H. • • • • . 1 • • • • gid` =cra -.,�.,,... .. _ .'.e�✓iiCtili- __ "y_. ..tx:....y:,;..:?... <,.- r'-eam.a,. c. .. ,, -....,-. 3'719200 • RE: #2 on the Map RESOLUTION 0 227 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OP AN UNNAMED STREET IN REST POINT PARK WHEREAS, pursuant to due and proper notice according to law, a public hearing was held by the Village Planning Commission at the Village Hall, in the Village of Orono, Minnesota, on October 16, 1967 , at 7: 30 F.M., CDT. , to consider a petition brought by a majority of abutting land owners for the vacation of the following described street situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: All that part of an unnamed twenty-foot street between the following described property: Lot 6 lying SE-ly of NW-1y 40 feet thereof, Plat 43080, Parcel 2700. Rest Point Park, and Lot 9, Plat 41940, Parcel 9000, Rergguist Addition to Saga. Hill, Section 7 , Township 117, Range 23. WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined the vacation of the said street is in the best interests of the Village; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED as follows : The petition requesting vacation of the above described street is hereby granted and that portion of the above described street is hereby vacated subject to utility easements . Adopted at a regular meeting of the Village Council of the Village of Orono, Minnesota held March 25, 1968. Cri #0-44 _rr H:;` ass, ayor Att t' - - �c: . r� A:m istrator • /5- ,/r IJ f I v 1 4 STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HEN1E2Iff MB VILLAGE OP ORO) O RESOLUTION #227 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF AN UNNAMED STREET IN REST POINT PARK I, P.7ank VI)mt Village Clerh of the Villa,-;e of Orolo , Hennepia County, Winnosotc., do hc!reby ooxtify :that I ham ompare6 the fr.:: e-c0Ag $lopy of 1:(!aoJulA,y1 . ;o Counoftl of 'ohs -;i1Lau of Orono wit1th oTlig1 )0.! reno.,'1 o1 such vero?AttioAi hr MiAMtU8 o LU Oulincil al a naetiA; of ;.,Eci.d V..1.13age (: 1111, a 'not(t oa March 25 , 1968 and that the sane io a iirm. ) copy of nai6 o: i. record amt that :3 U pxo duly adcptc& bs Fiaid Villccg'3 Covateil Et ale wationg, IN WITNESS WEREOF, I. have hereun.4o set .4];, hand and oaal thin . aaY /OP / t 14,Urg StOf ASCre<1171.-L L211., Fran EU:to,7 V' 11LIgo t\Y '1: II . • • \V •• ., r ' - ' • :r . ' •;• • !‘ n •" 3719200 lb) 1 , t// k JUN12•68 9 2 0 0 a OO2.1OBo A P:, _ , . orricr OF REGISTER OF DEEDS ['Tf.1, U. M1NIIESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I hereby certify that the within instrument was filed for record in this office on the 12 day of JUN A. o. 1968 at ) o'clock911., and was duly recorded in book 8 rof Hennepin County Records } v,c.ge :3'71 X3200 qk - i„� „-1„ - • �O�DEEDS _ gy �`ff,I/1r.�-. } •EPUTY REOIBTER OP DEEDS t 1 Z2/< (R-lz / C/G+0_40+ -- • /r.•.' .e-k) 624 ci te.tx ,-,2-1. ,..,,_, . G Os, r Doc No 9023318 08/13/2007 12:48 PM Certified filed and or recorded on above date: RE• #3 on the Map Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Michael H. Cunniff, County Recorder TransiD 334456 Deputy 3 Fees $35.50 DOC $10.50 SUR $46.00 Total • • TRANSFER ENTERED HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES AUG 13 1007 HPIN COUNTY MINN. BY, C DEPUTY STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned,being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the Orono City Council on March 22 , 1965, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City,this` 18'h_ day of July , 2007. 4-0:`�_-, r: ,0 % • 0 City Clerk ' r '(seal') '• -' -, - a 0 fAa II 1 Eq; (Resolution #92, Continued) Adopted at a regular meeting of the Village Council of the Village of Orono, March 8, 1965. • 71..4 H. R. Ross , Mayor- Attest: /7/7./.-Y Frank ixa, C k . RESOLUTION #93 A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE VACATION OF THAT PART OF WEBB STREET LYING BETWEEN LOT 1 OF COFFEE'S ADDITION TO SHADYWOOD AND LOT 14 OF EAGERNESS , TWP. 117 - RANGE 23 WHEREAS, pursuant to due and proper notice according to law, a i public hearing was held by the Village Council at the Village Hall, in the Village of Orono, Minnesota, on March 22, 1965, at 8:00 P.M. to consider the vacation of the following described street: That part of Webb Street lying between Lot 1 .of Coffee' s Addition to Shadywood and Lot 14 .of Eagerness, Twp. 117 - Range .25 ; and • WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined the vacation of 'the said street is in the best interests of the Village ; ._ NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED as follows: - The petition requesting vacation of the following described street: That part of Webb Street lying between Lot 1 of Coffee' s Addition to Shadywood and Lot 14 of Eagerness, Twp. 117 - Range 23 is hereby vacated. • Adopted at a regular meeting of the Village Council of -the Village of Orono, March 22, 1965. H. R. R ss, Mayor 1- 21- Attest: - rank Mi a, Cler CELMS November 11, 2019 To the honorable Orono Mayor Dennis Walsh and City Council members Re: Public Easement located on Highwood Road We are penning this letter out of great concern regarding a request that has been made to vacate the undeveloped right of way,or alley,located between the residents of 4156 Highwood Road and 4167 Highwood Road which would prevent local residents access and enjoyment of Lake Minnetonka.This request is in complete disregard for ones neighbors. How are you able to have open communication with your neighbors and build relationships if you are so willing to close off that communication by alienation.The alley has been used for a variety of reasons...most notably,snowmobile access,cross country skiing,winter walking on the lake,etc.and for decades(we have been residents for 28 years) without any disturbance or harm to the land.Those of us that have had the opportunity to use this small piece of property over the years have been diligent about keeping it clear of litter as well as keeping it as natural as is possible. We are also aware of a recent landscape project that occurred blatantly extending into the"alley or easement" owned by the City of Orono without prior permission from the city planners,surveyors, or its inspectors. No written notification was mailed to surrounding neighbors for input,approval,or rebuttal of the project. I guess the"old saying"has some truth."It's easier to ask forgiveness later than it is to get permission first" by Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper. This entire request has the appearance of entitlement and can be viewed as egotistical and self-serving. To think that one would have no regard for anyone other than themselves has become common place and we are facing it in ail aspects of life. So in ending this letter we would like to again voice our strong opposition for the request to vacate the undeveloped city land which has given local residents right-of-way to access Lake Minnetonka again located between the addresses of 4156 Highwood Road and 4167 Highwood Road. Sincerely, (.._ 22,12,t_e_eCi A Erik and Laurie Celms 1535 Highwood Ln Orono, MN 55364 CUSACK From: Jim Cusack To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE: Retaining wall in alley between 4156&4167 Highwood Date: Thursday,October 24,2019 9:20:22 AM Attachments: image002.pnq image003.onq image004.pnq image005.onq Melanie After speaking with a few of the folks in the neighborhood It seems as if the illegal construction and encroachment on city property needs to be addressed and resolved BEFORE the vacation request is even considered I was at the council meeting when the variance to build 4156 was issued. at that time it was made clear to the homeowners the restrictions there would be on developing their lot As I have stated before the ally has been used by many folks in this neighborhood for as long as I have lived here (1993)to gain recreational access to lake Minnetonka and needs to be maintained for future residence this ally belongs to and is used by the residents of Orono Thank you, Jim Cusack Territory Manager/National Trainer Cell; +1-763-219-2787 Main Office: +1-618-664-9010 ENERTECH ENERGY.TECHNOLOGY 2506 S Elm St. Greenville, IL 62246 GeoComfort I Hydron Module I TETCO II 13 Ell Confidentiality Note:This email may contain confidential and/or private information. If you received this email in error please delete and notify sender. From: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent:Tuesday, October 8, 2019 2:01 PM To:Jim Cusack<Jim.Cusack@enertechgeo.com> Subject: Retaining wall in alley between 4156 &4167 Highwood Jim I wanted to follow up with you on your question about the improvements within the right-of-way. I spoke with our public works director and he noted that: • The wall appears to have been built without a permit or encroachment agreement. • The wall should be removed and site restored or a permit processed and an encroachment agreement approved by the Council. Let me know if you have questions. The public hearing for the vacation request is on November 18th Melanie tilidr4PW. Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. From: Jim Cusack To: Melanie Curtis Subject: alley between 4156&4167 Date: Tuesday,November 12,2019 11:47:08 AM Attachments: imaae005.onq image006.onq image007.onq imaoe008.onq Jim Cusack 4140 Highwood Rd. Melanie As I have stated to you before I have lived here since 1993 and this alley has always been a lake access point for the residence of and a highlight of the Highwood neighborhood You had asked me to send you real estate listings that included the alley as a highlight of the property Here you go Thanks for your help https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/4148-Highwood-Rd-Mound-MN-55364/1756664 zpid/? • r: ~" ' t�rr • • Sr • • • Lai '417 U , r+ ^ } .P7 4148 Highwood Rd Mound, MN 55364 2 beds•2 baths• 1,136 sqft Is this your rental? Get a monthly local market report with comparable rentals in your area. 0 I own and manage this rental I manage this rental for the owner trier€msii Subscribe Claim this home as your residence Note:This property is not currently for sale or for rent on Ziflow.The description below may be from a previous listing. Your new home is located in a small,quiet neighborhood across the street from Lake Minnetonka. Grocery stores,restaurants and bars just minutes from your doorstep.You'll also be close to the Dakota Regional Trail and Highwood Nature Trail(Orono Parks System)is right at the end of the street.Open floor plan,great for entertaining Hardwood flooring throughout the home Living room is wired for surround sound Gas and Charcoal grills Fire lane across the street that provides access to the lake(swimming,non- trailered vessels)lust 2-minutes from the nearest boat launch Oversized water softener and Reverse Osmosis filtration system for drinking water Gas fireplace for Thank you, Jim Cusack Territory Manager/National Trainer Cell; +1-763-219-2787 Main Office: +1-618-664-9010 ENERTEC. i ENERGY+TECHNOLOGY 2506 S Elm St. Greenville, IL 62246 GeoComfort I Hydron Module I TETCO D Confidentiality Note:This email may contain confidential and/or private information. If you received this email in error please delete and notify sender. HENRICH October 11, 2019 KOCH Honorable Mayor and City Council of Orono Re: Public Easement on Highwood Rd. It has come to our attention that there is a request before the Council by private parties on Highwood Road to vacate the alley between their properties at 4156 and 4167 Highwood Rd. Over the years many people have used this alley to gain access to and enjoy Lake Minnetonka. Your approval of this request would deny Orono residents of access to the lake, which has been used in the past and will be used in the future. We request that you reject this request and keep the alley accessible to Orono Residents. Sincerely 1 t 1 � / 110-C `/1-11311/ 1 33 (.9 ) ..LzilLA..), RECEIVED Nov 0 4 2019 CITY OF ORONO OTTO From: ottod(@frontier.com To: Melanie Curtis Subject: alley access Date: Thursday,October 24,2019 11:39:56 AM Hi Melanie, Darcy and I have resided at two home locations on Highwood Road (Orono, MN) for a period of over thirty years and it has come to our attention that there may be a consideration to eliminate an alley access to lake Minnetonka from Highwood road. I am referring to the access between 4156 and 4157 Highwood Road, on the end of Highwood Lane. Ourselves and several neighbors have been using this access for sporting activities on lake Minnetonka for the entire time we have lived here. The last number of years it seems that there has been an effort to block this access with the use of storing dock sections on it forcing us to maneuver around the stored material to gain access. Now it appears that there is actually a retaining wall on this access, which we had not received any notifications showing this wall was being constructed. We would prefer that this alley access remains an asset to the residents of the Highwood road/lane neighborhood. If there is anything we can do to voice our opinion other than this email....we would be glad to do so. Respectfully, Phil and Darcy Otto 4116 Highwood Road, Orono MN Date Application Received: 10.23.2019 �O`VO Date Application Considered as Complete:10.31.2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12.31.19 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator ikESHO From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: November 18, 2018 Subject: LA18-000089,Jim Cleary Everlast Enterprises Inc, 275 Crestview Ave,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary:The applicant is requesting a rear setback variances Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval Background The property owners recently bought the property from a building who constructed a new home.The property received a lot area, lot width and rear yard setback variances in 2018. The applicant is proposing to construct stairs to an already existing deck to access and use of the back yard. The applicants have stated the stairs are necessary and reasonable to the enjoyment of their property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305-Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1A Required Proposed Front 24.5' 24.5' Rear 30.8 20.9' Side (North) 10' 12.3' Side (South) 10' 10.2' Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 3 6,264s.f 2,192.45 s.f. 2,128 2,160 s.f. (35%) (34%) (34.5%) Applicable Regulations: Rear Setback(78-305) The applicant is proposing to construct stairs for a rear deck, proposed to be setback 20.9 foot from the rear yard, 50 feet is required in the LR-1A Zoning District. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider LA19-000089 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 3 recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to deck stairs which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The variances for a rear yard setback request is reasonable considering buildable area of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for a deck stairs in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The applicant is proposing use of the property in a reasonable manner. The deck, already approved by variance, encroaches into the setback. Any stairs would require a variance. Stairs are a resoinable improvement for an elevated deck. There is limited space to construct a conforming structure on the site. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. LA19-000089 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 3 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The size of the lot within the LR-1A zoning district is unique for the requested rear yard setback variances. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The size of the lot and its locations as it pertains to the existing zoning district is peculiar to the property 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Deck stairs are a relative minor improvement but important to the use of the deck andf yard. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variance would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application has stated the shallow lot has setback challenges.The property is unique in size for this zoning district. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds is inherent practical difficulties with the small lot on the LR-1A, 2 acre zone. The applicant has stated the deck stairs are necessary for the enjoyment of their property without stairs to the deck. The Commission should discuss whether the rear yard setback encourages development out of character with the neighborhood. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey and Setback Map Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Photos Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 10/08/2019 Address: 275 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723140023 Land Use Number: LA19-000089 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: NOAH BYSTROM Address: CHARLENE BYSTROM 275 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Charlene Bystrom Company: Address: 275 Crestview Ave Orono, MN 55356 charlenebystrom@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: NOAH BYSTROM Associated Contact: Jim Cleary jim@everlastdesignbuild.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Steps On Deck in Back Yard Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application D Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary.pdf111/15/2019 7:55:39 AM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000089 The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by Lice Zoning Chapter. Response: Our practical difficulty is that we have an above ground deck and would like to access the back yard from the main floor of the house. This would provide both more safety for fire egress and a way for the our dogs to get to the fenced back yard. This small increase in hardcover does not put us over our hardcover allowance (see survey). This also does not block any of the neighborsA?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A? a? ???A?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A?a??A?A4??A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A?a??A?A ??A?/E??A?a? ???AVE?? A?a? ??A?/E??A?Act??A?/E??A?a??A?AA?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A? Alt??A?/E??A?a??A?AA?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A,??A?/E??A?a??A?A4A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A? A??A?/E??A?3??A?A4A?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A?a??A?At??A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A ??A?/E??A?a??A?A-1A?/E?? A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A ??A?/E??A?a??A?AiA?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A?a??A?A ??A?/E?? A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A ??A?/E??A?3??A?A-1A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A? a? ??A?/E??A?A4??A?/E??A?8??A?ASA?/E??A?8? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A,??A?/E??A?a??A?ASA?/E??A? a? ??A?/E??A?A??A?/E??A?a??A?AA?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A?a??A?A.*??A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A??A?/E??A? a??A?A-,A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A ??A?/E??A?a??A?A3/4A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ?A?/E??A? a??A?A??A?/E??A?a? ???A?/E??A?a? ??A?/E??A?A??A?/E??A?a??A?Act views. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: N/A 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. sponse: No, it will not: the back lot is fenced so no one can see the stairs. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: With current setbacks, a set of stairs is not allowed, which also prohibits an additional fire egress from the home. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: No access to the deck and no egress to the back yard. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Stair systems on single family homes are allowed. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A "he special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(11).pdfj11/15/2019 7:55:40 AM] Letter View Response: No ? most of the lots in the neighborhood have decks ? some of them are elevated with stairs. Some of the neighborhood decks do not currently adhere to present setback restrictions. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Most of the lots in the neighborhood do not adhere to present setback restrictions. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: A stairway allows them access to the back yard as well as providing another fire egress. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Approving this request will have zero impact on health and safety of any resident, nor have any impact at all on the supply of light or air to adjacent properties. Nor will there be any impact on street congestion or public safety nor diminish property values in any way. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes. It will allow access to the back yard and provide fire egress. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(11).pdfll 1/15/2019 7:55:40 AM] a • n bn v� Oob'ubi LC) o yh^p 6'6' oab C_�ig c ll II F�°b ...o+Il 0 32o O>O 00o C ell v v II °o c-,--: �a3io 0 `04�� `o�" o a oL`o.`ooE v.'s.: (.) II Pi y 4 F U W rn .0 d 21i CSI°o� q bO^hµCON,- OO <t 0 I N .d Z v n U n 2 n OvNc0 0 &a Mw oOUcu �o. � 1c._-. . 3 0- Ir •mVA2]b U CO bgCC 0. > retC) OU `ryc O II UU • ; ., °j . 3 2 1 0 'IO 4 y4x° ih v U --.• �.- N °c oJ io: d 02om _.`8-CH a` moo. II =C v o v I 101 tia bI I //3/ (n • b P „ bN�h a�i0 r;2 N ly au4-1 9Jaa ua3- aA�7 a M27AlSa ia• y� 0 0 0 2 5,h 3 Q) • % snowlunpe jo a6p3- -, 2 `•3 i;y W m , ce:5' r'" 0005 3.f;OO.ON X 9Bs. -0°�m° o 0 0 • Q T P i I q gtiT A 1� z I .�C Y I 96• 9� I E a O Il to ��x Px xoy� a a ..E 3 v 95 a in .q e} }� 4J N �x N q y• r a N CD 0 N y O I�� I I m4 y.si 1+- l'6 o m d 2 W � - 0h--m, xa,. 3P-v I I , 4�2 13 m .,�:h �a.,� '11 D; .• , 951. ti.,.,N O .' l Z[ •moi c°� y y C O L \ 0h P • .y�' ,v" o c t 3 0 I y I y C O P m i , \h.,` ,'o�q Zh O W i0al sx 1 J O h P `q5 ° 7 • \.1-,,,_� 9h kk:),.,•,,,\\ \ \ ;sa��l \ o maw I a,.a. �P 1.4\ Nf,_.,-, _. i@ei ,-61, ‘ � o� �Io% .CII II II A ^ _ C IU GI 3 4 :".. x W�ti\\ z'Z'.. P ! li t.o .. 'x h \c h a"1 Wim; •h9 `?1 ;2 ami o..� wy� \I Ii x ^ a 95591 U m a P vet. °(N q k 0 W ti �� m 'o---y-IatYto- �', c(i�ry N + • 0 o a0 �y'Vl wiz/ zo I 'i r..-19.0--- 9y5' = yyt -c 0 0 P %of — 9 1 m. U O J Q Li) \\\ ® -.‘• — I +(0\ p ` i'\ m\ ya' L\ o a , U.D\., ♦I W O`A P\ P 1 c'''' ] M k(�W\ I a, O 'e� fn' v 1:" i x 0. P I' u v vJ K j yI .,2:,°' 11-.e`�, �sP 1 A I P 1 , O V C ~• . • O pld) 05x o T-- • o m m o • •W•D p W U aouaj-` M„�'F,LO.OS �" CQ Z -gr:',,,, o U ry 4a 0, � `l a', _ II J { e:3 1 Grading Prep ai Everlast E )1 i // xisting House } 24.5 9569 5. 3 (35'.6 9 ' �� istin'g/ x 9 N89.46 89 46'47"W x 95e5 x g�8. rl x 9611 G//Garage / 957'5125.30 (comp.) gy9 0 9 • s9s�N 959 8 • /�ii/9 956 _ 125.25 (plat) CO gb �� 956? .5%, 958.7 x x 958,8 95 c� !",.o'y, ,9,5>j, 57, y 9Sy 9s L • I • I ^ 7 957.4 sq.`Tx 9Sy3 ^ 'r 1 ® Ni --RW -i. Ni +9 I� 02p7.----44.I0955•9' 55 2 9s _i9ss� .573 958.5 x 959 9 .60.5 960,4 • / 1x Deck 24.4E �9 's n-StepsP!T •v --- 410.1House 1. Bitumin ^ - . 2.9/ vewO 5553 1.39 5 6 1.Dx9547522.1 _;; 9so. ::.. • -.0- se.1 i Pavers e..: 40.7 - o h9 55 66 ".."5".1765-9 I9'S> ci 6 RW 5 ' Drain Tile- .f 95 ' g5 . 95 91 3 I 12.9 .5\N„,..9_6.0.• 960 �" g6o sx Outlet 95491. Nxi�/94`-RW p I 63S9s• ss 74 3 1�,......i___.../s,_955.9 95'3.5 95?8•� 95k .5.4-6 955 .65.3 *9556" 95 -.r�4.. ._..A.1`.:. � �' `95 t 96/ t 95 ,� �9oeo •_ • •- • --• w • • .• •- _----. - '9'3'; �3> '--Fence S89 45'26"E z9 s•� �°� s o _ - --24.5 --=�- 125,4t1 (comp.) 9y6� Existing House kis ? 125.25 (p fat) FFE=959.1 Legend • Found Iron Monument --0-- Drainage O Set Iron Monument (LS 14700) O Existing Well Bearings based on assumed datum. x 000.0 Existing Elevation 0 Manhole 1 hereby certify that this certificate of survey was prepared by me A SCHOBORG or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered LA D SERVICES Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. / . /1111 !,. INC. �' - _� 'aul B. Schobor•�---- 753-972-3221 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SEII �,y www.SchoborgLdnd.com Delano, MN 55328 Date: , //{fit 37- t,i_c1/i` Registration No. 14700 '- -"t Survey 'd for: riterprises Site Address: 275 Crestview Ave Orono, MN 55356 Boundary Description (supplied by client) Lot 6, Block 2, BAYSIDE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat AMR 960.8 thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject '� to any and all easements of record. ha 90 x41 off: ti x �? accy m U) As—Built Elevations: Proposed Elevations: I, First Floor = 962.9 First Floor = 963.5 Q) Garage Floor = 96 r e0 s):11.0 Garage Floor = 961.0 9 V _6p2 Top of Foundation = 961.3 Top of Foundation = 961.3 I Q; Top of Foundation (lookout) = 956.5 Lookout Window = 956.8 Basement Floor = 953.3 I 9.59.9 9 Q) �^1 cAs—Built Hardcover Calcs. (sq. ft.) Project Benchmark: House 1,456 Top of Rim of Manhole at centerline o a 4a e6 Bituminous Driveway 469 Crestview Ave and Lot 5. x 95 Cantilever 31 Elevation = 960.8 �,,) Stoop & Steps 47 ox Ss, Pavers 84 m s Deck & Steps 132 Retaining Wall 72 14 I 2,291 I� (less cantilevers > 4 ft above grade) —31 (less the first 100 sq. ft. of deck) —100 2,160 Total Lot Area 6,264 Percent Hardcover 34.5% b Number: 8670 lok/Page: LL rvey Date: 5/29/18, 12/20/18 7/29/19 SCALE awing Name: everlast.dwq zn o io zo w awn by. DM5 visions: 7-11-18 (hardcover colts) 10-1-18 (house dimesnions) 1 inch = 20 feet 12-20-18 (foundation as—built) 8-1-19 (grading as—built) M /Cant/ 15 6' 1 6 / / II'-3' P R MAD VOR • 7-T119 3 1 a kr [ D\ Er 2 m 2: 16 : , G a a, 410 \ a 6 . §i- Ree GIRDER iOXo _ F3 —y Z \ T � s 16�6 . —m 11 1 i'-‘ 1 ao g m 4 8E12110 a 1— 1O 3-b' 3 6' II 0 I/2' / zO 111 73 4®, ,. 3 •432 �., / 1— IMFF-171--Mi"..6'.; .... —w! z a Wa b-\ o § I. §A P Ey! Ord ® T: P rill gyc{P c.' -1E1.6 5'-0• \ ON 7N,GL -'R Waal TO 6TOOP a o€L> S Y b•q 11.1416E8R TI6E6 — 1t-ogrx s o AD DOOR 1 1 1 2-14'tot HEVER /Q^�\ nrnnwauTO WALL \ \ \ I /Cat. 4-2 2-B I,f. K-B 7-B / / A'-4' / II e / ,, g. c / - -- 275 Crestview Ave Ln M -�,�` NI Orono,MN z 10> ° m JIM CLEARY s» u N T EVE T JIM612-868-0748CRz �� ENTERPRISES jim@everlastenterprises.com �� Erq} ft 0 qG• yl f 4 - - .7th' ` ,. i ii t A At . I %'.# i .' A ,01..• . .; 7,,, may t ,...„...,_,•,--...,-.'I'' , .4„1 ......,....;2„, ,•,,,4 • }1!, .• _.„ , ,. ..... . , ,,_____ ___ k------- s; ., 1 ;,, ., ;;. -,-44,,,,„, ;,;,,,, ; .,, ,,,......:,,,,i4. •. r�� .:* • , . ; ; , ... , . .,,....,,,... .,,..„ e •• . . ., ..„ . .., •.... .. • ,. ... . . r. . . . . .. . , „ y , .. . ,.... ... ., . ili*, ' '-ii:' . . , • . . ,.. .., ,. ... . . ... _ . . _ . . - . '' ... , ,. . .. . . . , • . . . . .,.. , . . , ! . - . ; A.,,,,. ---: , .-. : - ; „.,- 1, Ked a, _ „. .. \ "..� • : -•:: -4.-- a „. ,. . . . . - . .. . • 4'.7.-7W1.-'--...'. ...; ,-.. - - . ” :..-- . --,.- ,:f' ,..,. .. W_ _,.. , . .. -... ,.:-.,,,,.- ,.###-- #'-. •#..0# 4. -. .4 - r' i .. 0 ` ., ”` +r d s "; 'a' �d - ,,- r- , 1 .L # fit: • It hi I 11 II IiI d 00e1W. °I i HI� • j. 7/ II1 , , { ,,�' III ., . f I $ F .. .8..,u§yam. -`'%—''` illy II ;s • N = .. 1 --------— ___ 44 ---- .v�- �1 Aw l&' I, a f v+ N. 1 • • • r • ¢ ,u . , RUN DATE:10/08/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 05-117-23 11 0006 38 05-117-23 13 0053 38 05-117-23 14 0024 L C DOUGHERTY&M DOUGHERTY T G VAUGHAN&N P VAUGHAN THE RETURN HOMES LLC 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD 205 TONKA AVE 285 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LUCY C DOUGHERTY TIMOTHY&NATALIE VAUGHAN THE RETURN HOMES LLC MICHAEL T DOUGHERTY 205 TONKA AVE 2613 COMMERCE BLVD 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 MOUND MN 55364 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 12 0015 38 05-117-23 13 0054 38 05-117-23 14 0025 STATE OF MINN T M ZIESMER&M T ZIESMER THE RETURN HOMES LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3440 BAYSIDE RD 285 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT TODD M&MARIE T ZIESMER THE RETURN HOMES LLC ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 3440 BAYSIDE RD 2613 COMMERCE BLVD 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 MOUND MN 55364 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 05-117-23 13 0012 38 05-117-23 14 0008 38 05-117-23 14 0028 BLAIR MILESKI&APRIL NEWTON J W WOJCIK&K L WOJCIK P O SKOOG&S L SKOOG 3420 BAYSIDE RD 3310 BAYSIDE RD 250 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BLAIR MILESKI&APRIL NEWTON JOHN W WOJCIK&KIT L WOJCIK PAUL 0&SHERRY L SKOOG 3420 BAYSIDE RD 3310 BAYSIDE RD 50950 S BIG TRAVERSE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LAKE LAKE MN 55356 LAKE LINDEN MI 49945 38 05-117-23 13 0028 38 05-117-23 14 0012 38 05-117-23 14 0029 M JAMIESON&N JAMIESON STATE OF MINN C C WEBBER&E M REDMOND 295 TONKA AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 230 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL JAMIESON DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT CASEY WEBBER NATALIE JAMIESON ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN ELLEN M REDMOND 295 TONKA AVE 500 LAFAYETTE RD 230 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0029 38 05-117-23 14 0018 38 05-117-23 14 0030 BARBARA J HUBER SCOTT D HOCHSTEDLER KAE PARTNERS LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 290 CRESTVIEW AVE 315 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA J HUBER SCOTT D HOCHSTEDLER KAE PARTNERS LLC 3390 BAYSIDE RD 290 CRESTVIEW AVE 1400 MAPLEWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0030 38 05-117-23 14 0019 38 05-117-23 14 0031 DANA S BRUMITT BRYAN QUADERER WENDY SULLIVAN 3400 BAYSIDE RD 235 CRESTVIEW AVE 325 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DANA S BRUMITT BRYAN QUADERER WENDY SULLIVAN 3400 BAYSIDE RD 235 CRESTVIEW AVE 325 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0042 38 05-117-23 14 0020 38 05-117-23 14 0033 HUNSLEY FAMILY JT REV TRUST JOHN D TIES BARBARA J HUBER 3464 EASTLAKE ST 245 CRESTVIEW AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 MARK A HUNSLEY JOHN D TIES BARBARA J HUBER NANCY E HUNSLEY 245 CRESTVIEW AVE 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3464 E LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0046 38 05-117-23 14 0021 38 05-117-23 14 0039 JEANNE M BRAUN TRUST STEPHANIE REIMAN KARL NYGREN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 255 CRESTVIEW AVE 340 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JEANNE M BRAUN STEPHANIE REIMAN KARL NYGREN 14342 HARBOUR LANDINGS DR 255 CRESTVIEW AVE 340 TONKA AVE UNIT C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 FT MYERS FL 33908 38 05-117-23 13 0050 38 05-117-23 14 0022 38 05-117-23 14 0043 B W HENNING&R L HENNING KAE PARTNERS LLC THOMAS R BETZ 245 TONKA AVE 265 CRESTVIEW AVE 300 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRIAN W HENNING KAE PARTNERS LLC THOMAS R BETZ REBECCA L HENNING 1400 MAPLEWOOD DR 300 CRESTVIEW AVE 245 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 13 0051 38 05-117-23 14 0023 38 05-117-23 14 0049 R A TOFTELAND&M TOFTELAND N BYSTROM&C BYSTROM STATE OF MINN 1 225 TONKA AVE 275 CRESTVIEW AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 RYAN A TOFTELAND NOAH BYSTROM DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT MARTHA S TOFTELAND CHARLENE BYSTROM ATTN: DEBBIE GURTIN 225 TONKA AVE 275 CRESTVIEW AVE 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST.PAUL MN 55155 RUN DATE:10/08/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 05-117-23 14 0050 38 05-117-23 14 0066 STATE OF MINN AMY S KORSI REVOC INT TRUST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3215 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT KEITH P KORSI&AMY S KORSI ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 3215 GRAHAM HILL RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 05-117-23 14 0052 38 05-117-23 14 0067 BARBARA JOANNE HUBER SCOTT NAISBITT/NANCY FAHIM 3390 BAYSIDE RD 3225 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA JOANNE HUBER SCOTT NAISBITT 3390 BAYSIDE RD NANCY FAHIM LONG LAKE MN 55356 3225 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0055 38 05-117-23 14 0068 JEFFREY S MELBY COURTNEY R KILL TRUSTEE 240 CRESTVIEW AVE 3235 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JEFFREY S MELBY ROBERT C&COURTNEY R KILL 240 CRESTVIEW AVE 3235 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0056 38 05-117-23 14 0069 J F LEHMEYER&T L LEHMEYER MICHAEL&MARILYN HUTHWAITE 320 CRESTVIEW AVE 3382 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOHN&TRUDY LEHMEYER MICHAEL&MARILYN HUTHWAITE 320 CRESTVIEW AVE 3382 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0057 W R STEPHENS III ET AL 350 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 WINFIELD R STEPHENS III 3770 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0058 DENNIS LAPPEN/DEANNA LAPPEN 3300 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 DENNIS LAPPEN 3300 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0059 MICHAEL R GILBERTSON ET AL 375 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL/GRETCHEN GILBERTSON 375 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0061 PA&KSSKOOG 280 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 PHILIP&KAREN SKOOG 280 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0062 SUSAN A M GOHMAN TRUSTEE 330 TONKA AVE ORONO MN 55356 SUSAN A M GOHMAN 330 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 14 0063 ROBIN WEISS GRIERSON 270 CRESTVIEW AVE ORONO MN 55356 ROBIN WEISS GRIERSON 270 CRESTVIEW AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/8/2019 ht 4 3240 3211 3415 3315 p'1 kri 1 3 285 � i On 250 205 a 225 215 23 5 I2t :,3 23 0 _,3. az y '. :A toll -33 245 MwI .33 1 Y q 245.1n Mini 24 Y. Ott 250 t 265 ra 3470 3440 t 275 270 I 041 133I all 3 285 Qs, 03. 5 295m, gf1z 2643 .?_ 26i 285 .003 '42Q4aI f�, p„ i 300 3 t.rAI 13 s . MI330 434 3400 i 3201.16. 3 25 3 3>M 8'40 r ' t ,:lti S3AQbx �1 034 350 { % 3444 ( , No •iNu tr e 3 } s 3 424 fkl xt* t�I 3310 4 ` 1 . 3382 E' IaRU$ R� 4 ' 3348 - Nivt1 .3435! 3415 3400 3405 '. 3465 MO t rom 34Q7 bo-) ��+ , 3403 �4+ dwRd 405 ,..a..3 . -3333 4001 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 275 Crestview Ave This data (i) 6 furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (u)is fumehed with no warranty of any knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shat not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55,437/gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received:10.10.2019 �O�VO Date Application Considered as Complete:10.10.2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12.10.2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator ikESH°R� From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: November 18, 2019 Subject: LA19-000090, Brent Teele, 577 Park Lane,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is request an average lakeshore setback variance to construct a covered screened in porch to an existing 2nd story deck. An extension on the roof line is required to create the screened in porch. There is an existing screened porch on the main level directly below the proposed addition. The home currently sits forward of the average lakeshore setback. There would be no changes to any other setbacks, hardcover or structural coverage. The applicant received a hardcover variance for a home addition in July 2019. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330-Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Street 30' 50' Side (north) 7.5' 31.6' Side 7.5' 7.9' Lakeshore 75' 8.9' Average Lakeshore Not Met No Change Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: No Change Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 9, 389 s.f. (0.21 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. Proposed: 1,997 s.f. Section 78-1700- Hardcover Calculations: No Change Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 2,346.75 s.f. 3,235 s.f. 3,233 s.f. Tier 1 9, 389 s.f (25%) (34.45%) (34.43%) LA19-000090 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 4 Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The subject property is currently existing forward of the neighboring properties. The home is set back roughly 89'feet from the OHWL. The first level screen porch is already existing and is included as part of those calculations. The proposed addition for a new roofline would be roughly 9 feet forward of the average lakeshore setback over an existing 2"d story deck that the family is currently using. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance The proposed location of the home additions do not block lake views of the adjacent property owners,and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The average lakeshore setback variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The variance requests are residential in nature and are reasonable considering the unique nature of the property as a large peninsula on the lake. The relatively large flood hazard area and existing improvements on the property creates difficulties in locating a conforming structure. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; ; The location of the structures on the property and configuration of the lot were not created by the property owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The visual impacts resulting from the additions proposed within the average lakeshore setback will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Rather,the home will not impact views from the lake nor will it appear to be more visually obtrusive than the existing buildings on the property. LA19-000090 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 4 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a residential home is an allowed conditional use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing home footprint is not set to change. The applicant I looking to include the 2"d story of the home over an existing main level. The home currently sits within the setback and the addition is not going to change the setback from the lake. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The proposed addition will not change the current setbacks from the lake or property lines.The location of the existing home is unique. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.The existing home can be re-built in kind,the proposed addition is necessary to permit the property owners continued enjoyment of their property.The addition is located in a location which serves the intent and goals of the ordinance by minimizing visual impacts to the lake. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed project will not impair the health,safety,comfort,or morals of the public. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.Granting of the variance will resolve and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds practical difficulty in the existing location of the current home. In order to have reasonable use of the second floor deck for year round use the roof must be extended over the existing deck footprint. The applicant is not creating any new or increasing the current setbacks from the lake. The proposed addition or a screened porch is entirely over the current home LA19-000090 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 4 footprint. Public Comments 567 Park,the neighbor to the North, has submitted a letter of support for the project. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Annotated Survey Exhibit F. Neighbor Acknowledgement Signature/Letter Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary plication Date: 10/10/2019 Address: 577 PARK LA LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0611723410046 Land Use Number: LA19-000090 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: BRENT J TEELE Address: 577 PARK LA LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Brent Teele Company: Address: 577 Park Lane Orono, MN 55356 teele12@yahoo.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Jesse Hartung Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Screened Porch Update Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: Cr—C2---Cj-----ZO Land Use Application Summary(9).pdfll 1/15/2019 8:07:32 AM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000090 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner proposes to us the property in a reasonable manner and is simply looking to improve and strengthen the existing screened porch / deck structure without changing the existing footprint that exists today. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The screened porch / deck structure already exists. The homeowner is not looking to change the footprint of the structure, only increase the height of the structure to allow the existing deck to be screened in. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The requested average lakeshore setback variance to improve and strengthen the existing screened porch / deck structure will not adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This condition is not applicable 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This condition is not applicable 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: This condition is not applicable. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The majority of the homes both to the north and south of the property have very similar proximity to the lake and are consistently in line with each other. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdfjl 1/15/2019 8:07:33 AM] Letter View 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. sponse: The proposed improvements to the existing screened porch / deck structure will make conditions er and more enjoyable for the homeowner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The proposed improvements to the existing screened porch / deck structure will create a safer environment for the homeowner. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdtj11/15/2019 8:07:33 AM] \ Cor CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR \ Z x OF LOT 12,BRENT BLOCK 6, NTEELEMMIT PARK I /// \1 r=4.1 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA am¢G.r / 015; 1 cn> <4.T n 51 EXISTING _ I f��'3 .v 1 vv �� HOUSE ^ i 1 \ \., AV V AV /567 1 ' A>•, m 0 Xi 2 i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ DECK _- ---§se �S`�\ `-9ay. Q 2 �\ V v \v vv v � vV \\ v A i ul IX 0 , BATOP \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 'I `\ �SB� — i (i0 BE RENOVED)A(C) Uo 46_77 v ., [[[/// ,,,,..............---------------,,,‘,'k:79---0?.;\\[,\____---\-\:.,4 v' \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \.._ lam e' nae PROPOSED \\ /(U �� \ V A o„v EXISTING (9>,i C, \ v v a 6'�5vs r 1 ,1 ,i ADDITION \\- / w V A �v� f e r e HOUSE r a) 'y V o V A �� v v 1l �® 7,TBAcx N(0) ,e a'V A\ 'I— — a P m U v 2 ,v v v v 1 ,t.,..;0, v ixc 11.. aqr, v A 05— l > gore) V.' / • .nv v v v v .,,,,,\\._.11..., \ v A «w, wp+tp �A tir Av v "”'�nj 1' N"e°�\,, rox,a rra sTae�+n \\ ij g i 9199 CDNTpIa....� O_ 6 I to ,,t,..: \ —PS,s'---- o °,rr\ v A v 1 5 a','i ` v f' y LNE(D.NW.) \ 'Y tf \\/6 \ w 1 (H)\ , - 1 $.S LAKE \ w\ % DRIVEWAY v 4' - \ \ � v, vv r0.. ..*°'� `ay `\v\y---) lav 1 €mo o MINNETONKA = 7 \\�A SURVEY--" ) °z _ EXISTING id A \A A P., v\ V A g���oA9 NORTH ARM \ s A a�\\1�,�� � \� �`a„.a HOUSE EXISTING \ o VmomVvC 1 A 1 v, /56a 1 GARAGE €�° W A 1 0'I�b� ) 1\ \\ =' � P 1M 1 eMA \ 11 11 \ A \ \ A\ \ A 1 A A v VI i 1 1 \ \ — � 1 \ A i1 \ \\ \\ A\ / \ \ V 1 Al \\ \\V A AV A % \ I Il 1 \ \A A A `` \ I 1 \ \ N\ \ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES 1 \ \ Lot 12,Block 6,Minnetonka Summit Park i 1 I \ Bp o, denotes iron marker e \ \ (BOBS): denotes existing spat devotion,mean sea level datum 3 y \ \ --917---: denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum 1 p \ \ Bearings shown are based upon on ossumed datum. 0 i This survey intends to how the boundaries of the above described property,the location of an existing house,shad,garage to be removed,spot elevations,topography, 6 11 visible"hardcover',and the proposed location of a proposed addition thereon. 1] It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. BA y,{ 19-1318 Ar l s 11116a 11;11111 '1lPorird101 V t 11 hi 014,..,,,,l, I,/ 4 1ifluII1ff' ! n '�!. I mil, I - hk hLI�:F��. ,� � �,1 IIS °,� T x !• , .46 ,,_ ill 1i IiIII 11041!) ,--- 41001440k46 i L 1 fir Olt r 1 1/,. h 0/1riVr,_ri / , 1l1ll_, ilo!I1 A/l - 14111illllilll,�IlPllllilll�:!Ijj!$1' IF-� Iil9 1 01 11 0 pi K ii 'lop Milli� ola DmOHO t3PB� 0 s C ° T HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. • w5 U I 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE TEELE RESIDENCE ,Ac z SPRING L432 763786-( ) ORONO,MN 55356 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. .......^_^ q v• 5`t lO Z \ • � l 82y gypy 3�8 d2i0i0p 111111111$3G 11-1��2N23 p I 411 01111111 Se r HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. MC gyp? m 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE ,_l ==6==you TEELE RESIDENCE b Ac. SPRING LAKE PARK.MINNESOTA 55432 A y CO.N BTDRU CTI❑N'r+ee.."oo".*."=.o"""._.," 577 PARK LANE I m (763)786-6069 M0ER � ORONO,MN 55356 a a SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. -"•"'""`•"" . ,.h^. -.: - - .. -F_ .�wiparab.:,u+w>awm' w�w.oa-•.s..�.w.., 0 T 5 0 O 1 O_ c, � --A a• sr r. sr 11111 II 7-'i kr1 � I p;` lit % ,' • 1 s e 11 1 RgN 41 $;I 10 PH , ZooUI ill I PO N oomm g 5 °Pill!1 P I,-A z , E ii III 11 HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. • w z r�m 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE MC .;,:,;11„;,!-R,... TEELE RESIDENCE O E m A E SPRING LAKE PARK,MINNESOTA 55432 MODERN•e......ae.,..o.,�..�..o..w�re. 577 PARK LANE bR mi m¢ (783)788-8069 Go NSTRu GTION'nao.,,,,ce.,..,��.�a. ORONO,MN 55356 s 2 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. _.+,- NOIl.....5N E10 Dale H38WD1 NHtld 3308 DNIHdS s x 9SESS NW'ONONO n •� IN '�Q[�. 6909-981(E9L) l',4 • I m 3N1/1 NNW 115 my ZE999 tl10S3NNIW'NHtld 3Ntll ONIHdS z 7 ?,s,33N301S3N 37331 3N 3aN3Atl ltlH1N30 eZE9 w 2 h 3 F4 A "ONI S3IVIOOSSV ONINNVId 31111011 o 2 g 114 e 11 111 113 6 0za08 3Ya ,7p7 J C 0, . 1:6 Qp&y 11 3 m N OOa !lap 1 `$7 Z J 0 `,2,°x-r4 Z ii i LFil. -2C1=—u3z <�r 1111 4Eel 4 2i Ili b i Def NI1 1a. gGlgi V 0 11 _ q ir I \ ISI . v (. 4� , - J J i 1. i __________1,,, il�I J-4. -t II .tk sI!1 93 3 II 44... '' azss- qT o Iy IBi TV -If- - °a s • ® a_ p I !i10111 �I 01:11 N (), te � ffJJ �7 C •A U • a 921 11111il 11 11 012414 1 Egad6 ° T HOME PLANNING ASSOCIATES INC. V "£ N-KT) 8329 CENTRAL AVENUE NE TEELE RESIDENCE �D mE SPRING LAKE PARK,MINNESOTA 55432 m S (763)788-6889 I` �NNSTDRU cTITIONn ® 577 PARK LANE ORONO, u N 5356 33 SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER BLDG. o..�i.+.••e�n CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR \ z BRENT TEELE // \. z d gi - OF LOT 12, BLOCK 6, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK I F HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA omvSmR c r \ U v O/ ff= / d EXISTING 'v v\ �\ HOUSE A \ \ \ `\ \ \ `\ \ \ \ DEck /5s� '-166? i`.� t4� Z CV� v \ vv � � �� �mnEwArV v A \ v , _ �Se_ (o eE REMo )D \ \ \\ `\ \ \\ \ }Ave 9 L9k shoves tbk L .._\ / y \ t \ �� %1— r� aYn \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Pmposetl 2nd Story ,c ,s \ `;\\ m•v'` \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ (screen porch t 5 \ �p +` J' C \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 1 y,u 1 Y -...., „,,,..T.._. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - e? �°°' s PROPOSED \\ 490.) d �� \ v v v v v- ` \ , EXISTING �"si ,e ° '6 ADDITION w \\ 4 p 1 \ HOUSE �4 M) e\ V \ \ } V A A'” v t S I4 I #577 n Wit'• '\ 4 _.. \ ` \ pB .. 0 i • �.— _ wt v''uv� \ v 5v v '°„, 7 ,,.„,‘ wnv � 12 a v — �tr- f i 15P.16 \939,TI.V. et---- 1 .:\ \g�� \ \ ',,,,l a \\ la-- : �. p LAKE .�(Dxw.) Yk D\yle) vv v n)I M)v vv� t°u., • . MINNETONKA �\ ®\ ..\w v vv v\ 4_,,s��.,Sef�,. ��`A\ ,�" % DRIVEWAY /, , — 6.i = Ee �r \ \ ecy�\\ \ \ �` �' \\ \\ -- EXISTING / rg �' !Io_ NORTH ARM \ \ ��,\toll_11,4 \ \\ \ _,.,a,.�- HOUSE - F '� � —*c v v ,(.7. EXISTING ��'' \ �' !v v' ) ' �v W\v A /sea \ GARAGE / F€2"° \ \..........._._._, \` \ j J , / k_�"'CCC \ 32. \ ,'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ------- i� sus OU 'a \ \ 't` 1 1 \ \ \ \ -- ' ��� 10 \ \ '� \ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ / '7 I S S I \ \ \ \ \ I A\ A\ \V \ IS \\ \V ; \ \ \ \ \ ` LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES \ I Lot 12,Block 6,Minnetonka Summit Park \ o: denotes iron marker y� \ \ 19093): denotes existing spot elevation,mean sea level datum d \ \ -- can se -gip---BITdenotes existing contour line,m a level datum \ \ Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 4 5 p g anis s y intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,the location of an ossein;house,shetl,garage to be r m ved,spot alevatioro,topography, @� all visible"hardcover',and the proposetl location of a proposed addition thereon. It does rat purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 6113 10-131B Teele Residence 577 Park Lane Attention: Laura Oakden City Planner City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono Mn. 55356 Adjacent Resident: Darrell S. &Sandra M. Alden 567 Park Lane Orono Mn. 55356 Dear Ms. Oakden, This short letter is in response to the proposed Deck Addition to 577 Park Lane. After reviewing the survey and the drawings provided to my wife and I by Mr.Teele we thought we should also look out our windows and go out on our own deck to see if there would be any impact to our privacy or view of the lake. It is our conclusion the proposed addition will not obscure our view or cause any possible damage to our property and there for are in favor of the proposed deck addition. Sincerely, Scot & Sandi Alden 567 Park Ln. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we)Darrell S. & Sandra M.Alden of 567 Park lane [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 577 Park lane also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Scot Alden Oct. 10, 2019 Property Owner Date Sandi Alden Oct. 10, 2019 Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application—January 2017 Page 15 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we) 91AVOri aiVinI of d R1VK YV [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 7 7[1 y U LAI, also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. .Y.coperty • ner Date 1V r11020 )C lxperty Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application—January 2017 Page 15 RUN DATE:10/11/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 06-117-23 41 0001 38 06-117-23 41 0061 38 06-117-23 41 0095 RICHARD R RUDD LORI ANN MELANDER S M WELLMAN&H L WELLMAN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4105 OAK ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 RICHARD R RUDD LORI ANN MELANDER SCOTT M WELLMAN 607 PARK LA 550 PARK LA HOLLY L WELLMAN LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410040 38 06-117-23 410064 38 06-117-23 410096 LOIS M BREDAHL S M WELLMAN/HOLLY L WELLMAN B E PETERSON&M J PETERSON 525 PARK LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4075 OAK ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 LOIS M FLANNERY SCOTT M WELLMAN BRIAN E&MARNIE J PETERSON 525 PARK LA HOLLY L WELLMAN 4075 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410043 38 06-117-23 41 0072 38 06-117-23 410099 TERRY R JOHNSON G M ROSCOE&K M ROSCOE LORI ANN MELANDER 543 PARK LA 4030 ELM ST 550 PARK LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TERRY R JOHNSON GEORGE M ROSCOE LORI ANN MELANDER 543 PARK LA 4030 ELM ST 550 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410044 38 06-117-23 410080 38 06-117-23 41 0102 T O'DONNELL&JOAN O'DONNELL JESSICA R NEWMAN D&K OLSON 559 PARK LA 615 MINNETONKA HGLD LA 537 PARK LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TIMOTHY O'DONNELL JESSICA R NEWMAN DOUGLAS&KAREN OLSON 559 PARK LA 615 MINNETONKA HGLD LA 537 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410045 38 06-117-23 41 0084 38 06-117-23 41 0103 P H PRESTHOLDT ET AL ROBERT ALAN DURLAND HPA BORROWER 2017-I ML LLC 567 PARK LA 594 PARK LA 4085 OAK ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DARRELL&SANDRA ALDEN ROBERT ALAN DURLAND HPA BORROWER 2017-1 ML LLC 567 PARK LA 594 PARK LA 180 N STETSON AVE#3650 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CHICAGO IL 60601 38 06-117-23 410046 38 06-117-23 41 0085 38 06-117-23 410104 BRENT J TEELE CITY OF ORONO ZACHARY C STALOCH 577 PARK LA 584 PARK LA 4081 OAK ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRENT J TEELE CITY OF ORONO ZACHARY C STALOCH 577 PARK LA 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY 4081 OAK ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410047 38 06-117-23 410086 38 06-117-23 410106 GINA R&STEWART L HANSEN CITY OF ORONO MATTHEW FRITZ/KRISTINE FRITZ 583 PARK LA 584 PARK LA 4055 ELM ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 GINA R&STEWART L HANSEN CITY OF ORONO MATTHEW D FRITZ 583 PARK LA 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY KRISTINE FRITZ LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 4055 ELM ST ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 41 0048 38 06-117-23 41 0091 38 06-117-23 44 0003 SHANE R&KRISTINE M RUDD NATHAN VANCAMP ETAL EXCELSIOR PROPERTY LLC 601 PARK LA 601 MINNETONKA HGLD LA 650 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 SHANE R&KRISTINE M RUDD NATHAN VANCAMP MARK JUNDT&JENNIFER JUNDT 601 PARK LA WENDY S VANCAMP 650 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 601 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 41 0049 38 06-117-23 41 0093 38 06-117-23 44 0005 BRUCE L MEYER/NANCY J MEYER ERWIN D SMITH ET AL BRIAN JAMES WILLIAMS 605 PARK LA 507 PARK LA 649 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BRUCE L MEYER/NANCY J MEYER E D&M D SMITH BRIAN JAMES WILLIAMS 605 PARK LA 507 PARK LANE 649 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 410060 38 06-117-23 41 0094 38 06-117-23 44 0006 M MACAULAY&A MACAULAY D&D SIEGEL R H&K L SPEETER 4100 ELM ST 4111 OAK ST 659 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK MACAULAY DAVID H SIEGEL RICHARD H SPEETER ASHLEY MACAULAY 4111 OAK ST 659 MINNETONKA HGLD LA 4100 ELM ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE:10/11/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 06-117-23 44 0007 M SHIELDS&M SHIELDS 669 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL SHIELDS MELISSA SHIELDS 669 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0014 B J GAMBONI&J A GAMBONI 630 PARK LA ORONO MN 55356 BENJAMIN GAMBONI JACKIE GAMBONI 630 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0015 EXCELSIOR PROPERTY LLC 640 PARK LA ORONO MN 55356 MARK JUNDT&JENNIFER JUNDT 650 MINNETONKA HGLD LA ORONO MN 55356 38 06-117-23 44 0017 KATHLEEN M RUDD 607 PARK LA ORONO MN 55356 KATHY RUDD 607 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/11/2019 t 0� 1i ; -- Allip,.,.. ';,, t ria" St '',-,7;4:41.07,1'4:!:', ..::-'---',=:.,s.,,--'..i,.-..,;2,'..4?4'XIcti.-.y.:,,,----:-.i_ 11.111111 ibli all p uc` ' erg, a VV X — m'.s-t -;,,,--::z.., lIl g X'' :'!!1;:::.".„.,k.A,,:':t;.--v-Z4 ..or . t. .„tea, .,,:i„' .... . .., c,,,..._,„ a .,<3 . /111111111 �ty • 04, y r a � y r - t s ,4�f i i p2t r3 Cyt ' :^ xw[9 ,fir 3__ �`,�} ,,rb '� e, a'^ ¢a@ _ _ �a �+;, acct' - .. e _ rf ' �` , • 5^a^ . -g "� .ate' ta, it Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I ( i I I I I I I 577 Park Lane This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy, (i)is fumahedwithnowarranty of any knd, and (iii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering orsuneying purposes.Hennepin County shat not bieliableforanydarnage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,'M i nn ea poii 5,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 10.22.2019 Date Application Considered as Complete:10.31.2019 ��NO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12.31.2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator -1kFSHO From: Laura Oakden Date: November 18.2019 Subject: LA19-000093, Alexander Design Group, 1971 Fagerness Point Rd,Variances, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting hardcover and structure in the 75 foot lakeyard and an average lakeshore setback for additions to an existing home. __ Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The subject property, bisected by Fagerness Point Road has lakeshore on two sides which significantly limits the buildable area.The proposed additions includes a new covered porch, foyer addition, deck/stairs, and a butler pantry addition.The new covered porch is proposed to be located within the average lakeshore setback along the (east) of the home. Portions of the foyer addition are also located on the east side of the home within the average lakeshore setback.The deck/stair are new and will replace the existing deck in the 75 foot lakeyard along the west lakeshore of the property. Lastly,the butler addition runs along the north side of the existing home and is set within the 75 foot lakeyard setback along the east of lakeshore and within the average lakeshore setback for the west side of the property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350&78-1279 Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Street/Fagerness Pt Rd 30' 28.7 No Change North Side 7.6' 23' 20' South Side 7.6' 19' 17.5' West Lakeshore 75' 50' 47.5' East Lakeshore 75' 107' No Change Not Met-the home sits within this setback on the southeast Average Lakeshore side of the property. A new covered entry porch is proposed as a new improvement within this setback. Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' West 83' @ 75'/77' @ OHWL Actual 16,768 sq.ft. (0.38n acres) East 78' @ 75'/76' @ OHWL LA19-000093 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 16,768 sq.ft. (0.38 acres) Allowed: 3,353.6 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,547 s.f(9.2%) Proposed: 1,935 s.f. (11.5%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay District in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 1 16,768 sq.ft. 4,192 s.f. 2,791 s.f. 1,037 2,777 s.f. 981 w/in (0.38 acres) (25%) (16.64%) w/in 75' (16.54%) 75' Applicable Regulations: Lake Setback,Average Lakeshore Setback&75-foot Hardcover Variances (Code Sections 78- 1279 and 78-1680) The property has approximately 500 sq.ft. for a building envelope. The west lakeshore 75 foot setback and the east lakeshore average lakeshore setback creates an extremely limited building envelope. The foyer addition is mostly located within the building envelope.The butler addition on the north side of the home runs along the side on the existing home and crossed into the 75 lake setback and the average lakeshore setback. The porch addition sits entirely within the average lakeshore setback on the east side of the property. The new deck/stairs sits within the 75 foot setback on the west side of the property. Many of the changes will be over existing hardcover on the property the additions will create new structure on the lot. The applicant is removing other hardcover and building on the lot so the overall hardcover for the property and within the 75 foot setback slightly decrease with this project. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot LA19-000093 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 4 includes difficulties in its double lake frontage, small size, and width. The additions were designed to protect lake views for the neighbors and meant to be within existing improved areas. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to improve this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit the additions to the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the dual frontage lakeshore, Fagerness Point Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties. The hardcover level, and encroachments proposed within the average lake setback, side yard, street yard, and lake yard appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The uniquely small size, location with respect to the lake and roadway, and required setbacks prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed hardcover level and setbacks are unique to the property;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of additions to the home which are designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residence and garage are allowed uses in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's substandard size, dual lakeshore frontage, topography, Fagerness Point Road, and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the requested variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. LA19-000093 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 4 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. .The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that a number of the property characteristics are practical difficulties making development and improvement challenging. The topography of the lot, the dual lakeshore frontage, which applies lake and average lakeshore setbacks on both sides of the property, the narrowness of the lot,and the proximity to the road are all difficulties that support the requested variances. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary plication Date: 10/22/2019 Address: 1971 FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1811723140007 Land Use Number: LA 19-000093 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: JAMES E SCHUGEL Address: JENNIFER A SCHUGEL 1971 FAGERNESS POINT T RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Kathryn Alexander Company: Alexander Design Group Address: 401 Lake St East Wayzata , MN 55391 kathryn@alexanderdes igngroup.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: variance application Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary.pdf111/15/2019 8:28:12 AM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000093 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner is requesting a variance to do a small addition off to the side of the house. Because of the lakeshore setbacks, this addition falls into the setback on one side of the house, therefore needing a variance. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: This is a unique property that has lakeshore on two sides. it creates very restrictive setbacks so that the building pad is quite small. We are looking to do a minimal addition that requires asking for a variance. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: This request is not based on economic conditions. The difficulty is in the small nature of the building pad. Even with the addition we are only at 16.56% hardcover. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined it Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The houses along this part of Fagerness Pt. are unusual in that they have lake on both sides. this is unique and untypical around the lake. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Most lakeshore homes only have one side of the home as lake. This one has two sides of lakeshore creating a unique problem when it comes to buildable area. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdf111/15/2019 8:28:12 AM] Letter View 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. sponse: The home is in need of remodeling and updating. Granting this variance will allow the meowners to continue using their property in a manner they can enjoy. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: This variance request will not affect the health, welfare or safety of the general public. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The hardship with this property is the extremely small buildable area. Granting this variance will alleviate the difficulty the homeowners face with it. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdfjl1/15/2019 8:28:12 AM] moo' ‘, - \ F \ \ .n� b �,".� w ��tiS Baa /i \ ,;=.,===. «:. •<�''>, R,:i/1%, •J ', vd \ 44' �.. ,,,„/ itibiik ,,,s' • ��,I °gals / ' • /o �A,o '//;'-'/-k,''',.4%, + / Y '''*, ' ' Sd R"4. �i/i «o z <a " l Ii \°+t, � i gd,5ryxi �/l//ir. / \� ..., .(�+ra'b4 ei '''..*''',t,�`�q: y4"‘':',47.„v,�. .,4 ' L ® A �`,,' St I I,.«°'{,a, ` r.{” q:' fit C'5 `%' ,u` 7v I `pi' h ssi «. Ss���a�,'' ,,...',As*,b�44 � N 548'19'37"W '.o- �� ''''''''''1' �p�,. r I l y, �:,� r..' ' ., / '°a six , �..Yy A / �/i a SWC A' <* \ 1°z s '''' (? /$ 'H..i .u ,—fi .4 7 / i 3)x0)f'• , ,a A �' ; ,o `/ •a. '°' f, ,�j F 1+ _ scut w FEET 4 / , L SURVEY LEGEND O PON PRE MOMMINT SET LW AWOL POLE F.ORR RCOR ELEM.. \ / / °aw 4 +,,� WRE x• e`er mum CFE WARE FLOOR ruvAnow2.1 TOP OF RINDATION ELICI OPEENRC EL. ANITARY R� uR DE OE pax ,o. Kumar __ RUING !ROAM yRSM .BLE IN �. w MT PONTPONTENDE.T.A«R,, ° CATREE DECEMOLIS ME TV REEDER. nem mamas Cep min.PROWS. 't;$6;''' ELECTIO0 MM.. EIRCE DR/WOE REIM.—ELF—ELECTRIC / �. _= W «R LISH2 DOLE 1.111.0(PEDESTAL —LELLE—05930,,,x wury ORE DB.HOOK UP WATER..WNW. —9—S.M.,'HBO FLAG RIX ATEDWARDI - STOW DEFER o f t1C WDERM00.3 CEu —EX— O GAS METER m 1111 GAS VALVE Eaw9-- TR.,9.NAL REV HYDRA. EIDI ® o«W o. e II NALNANRO. ®SOL BOMB D. g •I.,m sol ti,,<q.*"'" ,mi„^,.,^ mMm.w.^e..mr m..,•y.,.i.i^—"-'-'''vv-tee RG E _ FILE NO. ^".^'^ '"'°"'"""^""'"°`"'" N.,,,,,, "^n CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ,szvsa,z SATHRE—BERGQUIST,INC. ORONO, 1 I052.,s-soon PRRPARFD FOR: .,s,.nA7 , '"'"7""T a �•,.n e.-.....MJF,,. ..^..R..o, �� V """'"'„NRE.G«, w,.U,.,«N.zz s MINNESOTA DENALI CUSTOM HOMES / M m Mme^ 1 0 ilb by i. 44, o z F-o Q E�'` 00 5�O z� w¢ /• �o <},�` two 31 0 dsJ',y p �o` � .� �`- \ 'ate fi O I- a.' z z Li, NW'ONasi0 _C C '1<e' elouvw 13D 3JINply'n @J 11.410d NIOd 11_67 '0'6 S i` f0D® OIOILVITIY-Po.212 �� �. 610L ; LL VIDTIZINDOZI�tne�a 3ON3QIS3z! 1311-10G V ��� I II f,1 7-9 i i i i—i—i—ilii ii X1.0.1. I Cs A / !IOIIII!IIIIIIIII U MIIIIIuII ��:>� i... ZA7. rir ri 1 1I III {®I'� III 1 III I IN rill!'iliiill ■I ®I�I wZ -r.0�,1 -rs• -ns� Zw.�r401 a 4 �PJ 4.11-4,1 "11111 I 4 1111111 ; r„ inittil 1:1 1 i _ 11111111111111111 it 111111111111111'. ��� MIII �, :::sA I I II II I I I < J E �.� - __. I. r meal M. jlll 1 111111�11i-' 1 QQ y awoII e. fp 1111111111 ' i 1'1'1:I'1'1'I.1'1'111.111 - .Ltf.� g f i $ i i a 44441111rrrr'•rrrrrrrr19111111111 '!44h4444444h4444444 $ SS, N g 0 A I II 1,1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4f 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1111.1.1.1.1.... .. IdLLL11lAAAAI.LLIL 1 111 ll III lit ya II Ifiall_ 11111111. -►I lo,arid 3 )-..agar14 m 3 i vo ! I I I ISI r I ��� �I ��������111 _1 J } ter. 1 - 11,'4 rumalikidImIllillllllllllllll limmi i� 1...............1.1.,.,.,.,.,. I'I'I'1111111114111111111111111111111111 I'I'1999•I'I'I'I'I'1'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I.1'1'1.1.1.1.1�1�1�1�11111111111�1111111�1�111114111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111411111111411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111141141111111111444441111111 II�I11!i1iiiiiU ''' I!1I11!I�I�II IIII1IIIIII11;1111�111111111111�i�i�i�i�i�111 1194 �111�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1. Illlllllllllllllll MIMESI= 1 i 0. 8 i i / - �' - ..1/2,,7.,.1....,..,:4 mrperinurirenzasJnrvw lid'OMOaO I� aTJyRNn ®iNiO 99�A 3�JOd aw (CA \ _ _ '..1r..` WELL a JdElmo-vs 3�N34163� Z HSS `r R° 'QVG1Wf �NOIlda7B34"�d11N'aQ p l � @gii;i;iii;i;i;i;i;;i; i;i; i;i; ;liiiiiiiiiii aai i IiIII IiiibiiiiiiiIJI q 9Fi111 JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII / 1 ; !. 1 1 f -,'1, 1 [muff {_--_t- .- 1 ..—ti4,1 1111I1I1IlCI1�1 W � w3 II t tk ' 6 7_ s„ 6i Bp�__r_r eG y� '111111111111[IIII1) _fi_ c F lii 1 . , ,l 2Ma li 1P _ F " h IN :-''',.:4,e,4 § , _'__41,.. .. $ imNuJN 4--a'— e 1 X11 1 1 1 1 1 „,,, ri:/---„,.,„, iir.-„tr,... 114 k ka.rA k E I ill I 1 t I II II II �I 1 _ V.— IL/7372 nMFA k E K ` Q 1 D E 2 E 4 g. krk� O ;711111141 (I = - < WM ,.CZ N 1W1ililbl 13327 "r• MNWNW 11410.1 aexd BM cel ! � tig e�� ! i }- - IFIN 1111.111,h JIIb1II1tIh!iI f ra I r4 k . [ .7,..T. e at k t .1a- r .. -1.1 1.1N 1kl Ii - \ /altri.'' iI • .II � � � ,.ni r il�le 11 , � Jil .. : �in! i@ '1 � '\— — ! iii § 0 \\\\\ ' R W 3 11e l l I I I I II1 11 11 1 A IIk O ii 10 ,y I I 1 Ne r3.a��u��� , .«1sura TO • 1. ...,0 FAL 111��� .ru .+! .Oi / SINK y� 1 1 1 i i NW'ONniN0 z. 3 i.' II_ _ Qpy® 13G 27%4 elYA Cita 1 d #J NIQekaNk13Cd IL61 Er - LL 7. clmca3001000Z ""•"°�•'""" 3ONdIS3e1laAlt•tOS `r B 2d Ai Bil :1 R it!; gid M •i !• 0 411!0i 111 I '--:: i .� 1 .,Y ..-se AS .NU t 1c Fa a ,,\ \ \\\ y,� y,� y� \\\ ^A ^.i ^ /17 ` Elnn -, 4 k to_,. e • iv €+ II t iil 11 aro IL i ( ) 'i_'' cam; Ii7. 1 1 a }} ii r S 1 _ f y i1� 1 III , ^ 1411 I 1-(t-',-71-,,1,; , ; ! II I I </ I I , , ' 1,,i, _IT 1:EL I1u_IFi`sI I ❑ LI I El 11%0 I I 11!CD IE �? 4 I • .M 01-4^/ .w A,l -__.�i s-M-! I. al fl-1 - .1. ...., , Jn ru , :FP • .MM / .ccFK• *X *..sr 1 6 EP Q5 i 5 1 1 i I 6 'v.. r ./i VP , rive /-IVP Y Ni TM T.IIT ! rr rP, a _. `..�"' ,a1 "•` 11 i i~ .,. - ! 1 , - ..ter, , x § • •f G SII 'I, II _ I I III rr f o ZieZZIEE__ �r ` § i 1H-4 * y L o• iii S II v a �_(- 4i ;IL__.,' i, i I�.1 - ice .F--�--,� 1 4. Ili 1 ..,,,.,I, r --- �i I I Ig . �,.,r r-P r+ Y.VII , 1,01.? C-r-v ± / -r PT n-r yr +ST § f IV l f L — S11L1�I V a § N 111111� hgila01eg i� I CI ell ie 5i 1. f i DRAWRG DEBCRIP1IOW CTGDER ¢ _ \ SCHUGEL RESIDENCE a2ocraeeRs®Ie s� \ LIT . 1.1 MR PLAN (...i. (�"� IBII FAGEREBe PONT R7VARIANCE BE7 s V oI'do 4O.MN z / z 3;?? �v� 1.-1.......,.., 132 32."(VA ON 1HIOd G93AI3�A'd IL61 R e< �mz u 3�N34I 13v11tfoS CvC) o r6 a 4 :.a t ! s_ 0 a ce• Itt it N� 'II • iii—x1 ---I 11 i 1 it II . ,t O 4: LI 1 1 16 1 g i mriermwgrorovaigi .ti.� a.11NIO�d .d CLW (1— t = S e' c4«aaaoyro u ""°° 30N3QIS3Z! '13Vni-tS — § mvalIwr .N01.6.217930 PVITTher 9 � i i mA \ a* 11 f aa W -....{ IIS s 0 a I $ —_I' i1N 'lN IIRt .ma.ew.. krtS F 1 t i i i _ " NWa�ioao EnS MYrvl wt� 139371NI7R'n ®I 1N10.91 9B$EI#lo'd IL9 Qaucoal SPa slot cc ,NOIia ea2p9 �amvaa �:JN341S32� '13�flH 9 t;) I I L Iir Ii # It w '"' —,_-_-_.—_—` —1 t A 9t II111111II i c' diF •T;'a1 UM 0 141 MI EM MI L — J 1 I 0 1 d g. 1 City of Orono t�oNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet F �: Property Address: 1971 Fagerness Point Road e'*kfsHos-s' Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 8/22/2019 SB Job Number: 19295-012 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 782 S.F. B Driveway 671 S.F. C Deck 150 S.F. D Concrete 90 S.F. E Deck in 75 foot setback 39 S.F. F Concrete 16 S.F. G Deck 52 S.F. H Pavers in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. I Stairs in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. J Stairs 93 S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q House in 75 foot setback 765 S.F. R Concrete in 75 foot setback 42 S.F. S Deck in 75 foot setback 35 S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z 2,891.00 S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover D First 100 feet of deck 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 2,791.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 16,768 S.F. 16.64% S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] % (Proposed Hardcover next page) informatio City of Orono 4oNa Hardcover Calculation Worksheet yf L� Property Address: 1971 Eagerness Point Road 4kEs 00' Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 8/22/2019 SB Job Number: 19295-012 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width _ Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E Deck in 75 foot setback 39 S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H Pavers in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. Stairs in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q House in 75 foot setback 765 S.F. R Concrete in 75 foot setback 42 S.F. S Deck in 75 foot setback 35 S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z 1,037.00 S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover D First 100 feet of deck 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 937.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 16,768 S.F. S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 5.59% (Proposed Hardcover next page) informatio i O,V City of Orono o Hardcover Calculation Worksheet � `� Property Address: 1971 Fagerness Point Road `.ktsriov--" Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 10/18/2019 SB Job Number: 19295-012 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of Proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict Proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 782 S.F. B Old Driveway Removed 0 S.F. C Deck Removed 0 S.F. D Concrete Removed 0 S.F. E Deck Removed 0 S.F. F Concrete Removed 0 S.F. G Deck Removed 0 S.F. H Pavers Removed 0 S.F. I Stairs in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. J Stairs Removed 0 S.F. K Butler Area Addition 79 S.F. L Deck Addition in 75'setback 60 S.F. M Foyer Addition 90 S.F. N Covered Porch Addition 141 S.F. O New Driveway 593 S.F. P New Stairs 171 S.F. Q House in 75 foot setback 765 S.F. R Concrete in 75'setback to be removed 0 S.F. S Deck in 75 foot setback to be removed 0 S.F. T Butler Area Addition in 75'setabck 78 S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z 2,837.00 S.F. (1)Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover L Deck 60 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 60 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 2,777.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 16,768 S.F. 16.56% S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] (Proposed Hardcover next page) informatio 4��N0 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ti', Property Address: 1971 Fagerness Point Road kfS HO Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 10/18/2019 SB Job Number: 19295-012 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of Proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict Proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. S.F. H S.F. Stairs in 75 foot setback 78 S.F. S.F. K S.F. L Deck Addition in 75'setback 60 S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q House in 75 foot setback 765 S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T Butler Area Addition in 75'setabck 78 S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z 981.00 S.F. (1)Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover L Deck 60 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 60 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 921.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 16,768 S.F. 5.49% S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] (Proposed Hardcover next page) informatio •Cy Y. T f N .. '. ,., .,- s. syr` . y .rye.q ! if 4's '-'9*. ...„,,,-..1,, ,,,..=7.--,-, ,_ ,,,....1.„:., ,, '.' • ,,i t,. ,',:-,1,r,---.,. $i) , D, ,r,..,, ,... zP,.. '§r {gyp" OrIllt h slit 4 ,/ .,741, �. �‘1.3 ,-- , ', 4 ,... _ . _ , s. ,,-,..--v4$3, 4 . ' ' '' ot:co f:45,.°- , - 41:11.' '',:11:':116'.* :tt- '41' rialk413i5;lf->lti?:. '''' ''' l''.1*'::' L P.:401:0 .---r'*"..t: ... ' , #:,1114: ' , * f $ 1• d' l ft �tr �' ,�, 1y «a • }4: x ,, ,..„4,., ..L, . ' " .141...tt'' 1444* ' . � ` (�'`. 01 � �ttf Y t yY �j� '-'-•-,_.y .A� �;Fi g/ � ; Arfix' h44t • T`'' j • . 'lei • '-- -'N'T., ,.. 0, 404„:.....„, ,_ .,;- :,'...,":::.? ,_„.;.....is,. illo. ,. ...... ., . ... . , .. g• �y .0 itioilip 44:4, Ift. 1,,' '':', .. ,,..„...,..„„?. .,,......„,,,,,,, g 3 �r .'••••'••-.,44',..r• 4• t ,ft `- 1 I fr�� i rre '„ ,+ice.; 4A; . _ `; .p, t. 0 « .4� i• .+4''+' '. tit!PZ 'y" ! r'4.',! %,„.,: tiin . k i�.-',.......6,,. 1 ° 3� yy •'-i..";',..,-'y fq(�t Pfj ,/ t • # '�r Y� �' • 4•°ra;it' ! sf' , 1:br' P x.�, ,� ! y `. ',•tie F i X11 f w� ' wr ar' ^tl 'yrr"pr�r .„6?: i' 2s a�`'a • til. '?�1. v s• �. • G� r.J +sir \ \ At i ' . s fir• 'TV,4 i. 1t • ti .„0:,,,‘,;" ,-ill+° 7 \ ' , \ r 99 • 4 t .�fr ,,S ., �� � / { $ e°! ' - k .k 'VII \ 1,,, ,', V ' \ ' 11 '''') kr 1 } q • / \'` de ' ` ! ° .$, r ✓ Al f ;,k4 t % fil 1 I/min ,t, Y 4 ,1 �� r ", ., j 19 4II 44 / 44 9j5 t /? Ql ' t f t • / k,, 0 ' }x 6 • d (Z-Ip.,- 't/ , ,\,' , ', "' ',-;',' :-;-',..i,:::-. - .."`,...„ .,1,- - 5.V.4 '..74::,3'.,:''.. '' i }t 4( �tY kid t• .vim t * akJ ". q,. ^yea S a�t -'* .,.14tf$1-1.–k ''l'-'N').,%,:i*,,=,„- 4 . ;e tc. e ,r ggpp .„ ry e , • 14 tis i€€ r.� . f+ +C.� ,..1.-4....,':..-- a }� t 11 � �• ° . ; .;. 3 "7 I 4 y.,i J.I `\ .. ` ,3 ; i . 'qs 1 , c.. > " ; ". - / ifig:,,:a..,,,,, f 0 �,,.. . ri y... , 0 t • r,.. "tip :,.'"--11:`,41t ',71.7.1---- --." .J• " d �: y-�:. til. d ` • • a • .4.-T./.1.-„,;* V d r • �.,,gin '\. !'}' '"s ;! �'• dd 4%.:„-- i si `�; i .� .ifV JL. '� � e.b$•„ -...1)4.-.,::--- ` L A r i ��, _ s� t ,' K +y .' :;h*,+j •' t . .9 : •.�+�` t ;4::'*: s'y'Nfl`. .� Y'KY ha ! . . Av �j A fr '`-.:-, a A, d y`� ry�t r Sp. 01tt fr --4:-..,,"Y".lt , ,T. s `_ 1 '',...... --'4,41�,� a } . .,....:...,_. , ,,,..,,,,,,j0:, .....,,,,..:::: :,,,,. , , : , . , ...,,,, a w ,_--- mum L t 24�N.. , Y a,d r .; t17 i crfix, ,.,r • 4"l t , ALEXANDER , Schugel DESIGN GROUP 3D Conceptual Illustration ,,,- -,,, Copyright 2019 Y TFt .;:i„.` •� ID11 im' •+ma�yy �.( c` +'i!^" e....,........4,-.k.,, ` ` Q :w 11 =. AF, t htI. . �� y '•� • ;. .;' ,,,. aZ k y i'/ .F A a,1 1 1./ fr n 'fi'� �.. �` t r` ,'•••1':"..,''',, s, ' wyrw.` 4 t -,'''01,,11 t, ;i tn.. / ,o- } {'i "+ n • Axa. ,� it,. .� p u• .•_-, :,•,-!'l "i,' '�cr- -'.•:--t-4.:,'.,---..; a`Tn -. i • F'' ,r '^• - '°'k t x, ' ' • -_„'���� N. — --Y' ,�'tl* *moo »c +,.y .14 rya • illi,_ *.. r a HI _��P � ��_�� III"1 y • _____ __ . .. _ y' v_ . > _ � t',. , ,,, ....... , .. '4jilit 'Allr ' �r� �w� L �yp+ _y au ?2 .•``a"- - .+• . +t-;�'d :.N : °icy” ' W't w """TnZn Z 1":' }' :::,.4-!;`;...i.<„, S`w p 4^ ALEXANDER k DESIGN GROUP FagernessPQit Road 3D Conceptual Illustration Copyright 2019 RUN DATE:10/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 17-117-23 23 0017 38 18-117-23 14 0009 A F-THOMPSON&ERIK THOMPSON G L EKLOF&C F LEE 1940 CONCORDIA ST 1965 FAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ANNETTE FUNKE-THOMPSON GARY EKLOF/CATHY LEE ERIK THOMPSON 1965 FAGERNESS PT RD 1940 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 23 0018 38 18-117-23 14 0010 DANIEL MCINTOSH M S IVES&K F GEMPLER 1945 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1955 FAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL MCINTOSH KARLTON&MARIA GEMPLER 1945 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1955 EAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 23 0028 38 18-117-23 14 0011 DANIEL MCINTOSH J B WALDRON&LYNN H WALDRON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1951 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL MCINTOSH JOHN B WALDRON 1945 EAGERNESS POINT RD LYNN H WALDRON WAYZATA MN 55391 1951 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0002 38 18-117-23 14 0012 WILLIAM AUSTEN GRIERSON JANET RAGATZ/RICHARD RAGATZ 1989 EAGERNESS POINT RD 1945 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM A GRIERSON RICHARD W&JILL RAGATZ 1989 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1945 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0003 38 18-117-23 14 0013 M R MILLER&J L MILLER T R CURTIS&J M CURTIS 1987 EAGERNESS POINT RD 1935 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL R MILLER& TIMOTHY RALPH CURTIS JUDITH L MILLER JANETTE MARIE CURTIS 1987 EAGERNESS POINT RD 1935 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0004 38 18-117-23 14 0014 MATTHEW BRIGGS/ALISSA BRIGGS THOMAS M KONAT 1985 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1925 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MATTHEW BRIGGS/ALISSA BRIGGS THOMAS M KONAT 1411 SCHOOL HOUSE RD 22275 BRACKETTS RD SANTA BARBARA CA 93108 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 18-117-23 14 0005 38 18-117-23 14 0016 NICOLE HARTUNG W F&K A PETERS 1981 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1950 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 NICOLE HARTUNG WILLIAM F&KARAN A PETERS 1981 EAGERNESS POINT RD 1950 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0006 38 18-117-23 41 0001 JOHN PURDY/SUSAN PURDY TRSTS DOUGLAS FICK&SUSAN FICK 1975 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1991 FAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOHN K PURDY DOUGLAS J FICK SUSAN L PURDY SUSAN K FICK 1975 FAGERNESS POINT RD 1991 FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0007 J E SCHUGEL&J A SCHUGEL 1971 FAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JAMES E SCHUGEL JENNIFER A SCHUGEL 1971 FAGERNESS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 18-117-23 14 0008 J BUBOLTZ&C BUBOLTZ 1973 FAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JOHN BUBOLTZ CHRISTINE BUBOLTZ 901 RIDGE CREST DR CARVER MN 55315 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/23/2019 "i-.t1','s .a-nom -:<';.'. .:. 4,-:<_: ',r, ''',Pi ;a�.:• '1;'f`ti•- + x� >s.,1 vt ,mac , k T ";,T.-.;----: ,- ` �` . --.*.IF-t _S'. :'tJ'.e% t -� 7 'Lr 'i-#ss£:-,--„r.,'.:;,,,!...,: . ,,i , -:::...:-:.,.,,,,,,v4:-:-- 4 1x 3 4 �'t., t7,-,11 ,,,,t4, -.,,,-.4.4.,„t � fid", , Y�,F::,,t.,,-..,,,,..,..,.T.,,,,4,,,„,,,' i .s: V �'�.< , iitiftftosemw, . �. u1 ' - -'.; g'.grA > . } / s74M , r ¢ -. s , " * 'r,`�as- 4. � . �,� . 3_, k» �>_4�g br _V ' -{ y� nA ':-74-1'344'... i'1414411 �� �� y�� ' °` - + : ', '�.bS .7t� ,.i ,s� {Fa}�� a � T;N :: Jhfi�r v. #A, ?'tY n.u _ ,.},.rift ',->:,4 e:,-,—:. r.5 *..1:E' ,--,--.1-;- ,�,�<,'�-�` , s: �. :�L,',,,r,x�,„_e': "a::. E=i�z,�-�=;�§ ,�- ,.1,,i..,,,-;,,,./:,..:2- ,J t.,.:,!:,-:„..--„:1--,: -..41,:z:le.,:o.!:i:.:-..tii..4i,,,,-,74-,:g.v.:eat.;--.-, -;:z.-.-„:4,-4:1, ,-z.:: Ill lTzs 'fizz 'fl,"-?4'..:'-' 'yr54*; - ,1if,?'sy`_- oi , .,, ':ce , ,li-, - - t: =- .011t..„ ..,- f`" ` i .'. € :i , sst �4t 1£J. _ •:,Icr `''-�i~"'~ �^..W� ..ti. z`'i. n fz 5-u =r. Q • F p 'X v'{,Y ' "- [ s.F- X =4 ,�r t, '.-.,_::? ,:,,,jr- .C3E•v �..a.z.'`• ^i�a 13N 'ft'-` �l ] l x i_ 'r Vi ', lir t sem.(-�--� W X" .firIt, ,:,. .•:` ' Y -.�: } f. . • - il" ;' 'a --r- -- ;tom.,, _ .;.,::.,...:, ,;i"; ��.:�.�:� :'•.>r,::-.�. :fie:,: _>"�-:..'j�+. .;.ei:ir:::.::,,,:..:, ': ., _ ii'. ;.:v---',!, "« ' cr � e 0.. -�',�2. ,.n.nt',F'. P _k y. >;.�=mac ;, Vit.' ",<, s-', 'k?3r __''� z';s_;y - .,e"s-'.kph+. �'K:7,`;�i-t� _%If' ��" r;{:i' �.� ,,�:f >-;:':�.:st� 3�:.'''c�3`;_ -i�.,. �'� £ ._ ,.#Y-a .;. 21€� 'gift,. ,a- ".41' +. .c.' _v-3{ v.r'r" .F"<"tp i. ._ t;.i.y - -j'"ay^'.».,y,.-iii_ _ "k... +i>-�' _�_ -..-� :�` 4'�+ � z-'_ .} ..'~S�]�ta" y ':-s����y"�-:s(#1�.,`> _ ,� �- �'.,i, �h�.•__' A�:3"'..lu..}.°:�:.�? '�ri'krie>,•,'; -it rx• ' `f••:: :y, - it Sc aAg.--W.,.1-11.:-:",".....i.• t...�.ce r Nii . u' 'i : ax s2 _ .Weir"p��-'n kz- ' :� •Y' .� }is - MfJ1-�" 4,5„,..:.,.--,_fi:.. syr't:.�a-:t,-ice' Xf .rt'., :;` ,�'�; ',: . :' . ' # - us. : .. = „^ ,s+ ? ='� ,zGe �: ; _ i; Wiz'" ._ = :'- : 5:4,i:"_`i 4 '' t ;. . ,-. i ;'_��' „>is .-..r,:,.... ..,,,,..:.;,.7-&-----. a,:` +-:� . .A-�....." .s "ZrV. tAr3' y : >Cr= f. ". i - :��� -WY "� y + : ' y : �th+ X2 :_ ._ a-h'+'_' . Ay:�in.:: 'i�P\ ' . ` ..v---,i.‘-e2,-� 3 : ,' zi:`".. � z '! E :# -'".t ' 3� �;nt::..p# 'i.�n;?r.:. `�:�.'>> s Kv �1 ;":-' -_St��. � ,� ,<.,,�2 . -'. ,,r.. v , a,. . - i „ ,s...,,oic-x4 .A ^, '-!----'--.4: t }'a ,rS Y h ,. "t''..::f1 -'-.1 Y, ' T ,F ."- o. Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 111111111 1971 FagemessPoint Rd This data (i) a furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy, (i)is furnished wth no warranty of any knd, and (u) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surany ngu purposes Hennepin County shaD not be liablefor any day injury a loss resulting from this data. Fo r na reinformation,contact Hennepi n County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,M N 55487/g is i nfo©hennepi n us Date Application Received: 10.21.2019 Date Application Considered as Complete:10.30.2019 "WA/O 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12.30.201911 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members �� ; Dustin Rief, City Administrator lkFSH°O" From: Laura Oakden Planner Date: November 18,2019 Subject: LA#19-000094, David Burda, 1966 Shadywood Rd,Variances, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances to allow structure and hardcover in the lake yard, side and rear yard, and hardcover in excess of 25%to allow for an addition to the home Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The home is located on a channel of Lake Minnetonka,the entire lot is within 75 feet of the lake, eliminating a conforming building envelope.The applicant is proposing to add a 46 sq.ft (5.7 x 8 feet) breezeway to the home connecting the existing home and garage. The breezeway connecting the home and garage creates one larger principle building, so a side and rear setback variances are required.The applicant is also converting windows into sliding doors on the east side of the home and is proposed to add a steps and a paver patio(hardcover) on the lake yard. The applicant has proposed to remove hardcover throughout the property which will allow for a slight decrease in overall hardcover for the property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Lake (North) 75' 16.5' 16.5' (No Change) 38' 38' (House) Lake (East) 75' 29' (Proposed Patio) Street (West) 30' 42.4 (House) 17.4 17.4' (Garage) Interior Side (South) 7.5' 11' (House) 10.8' 10' (Garage) Average Lakeshore No Change Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 8,014 s.f. (0.18 acre) Allowed: 2,000 sq.ft. Existing: 1,771 sq.ft. Proposed: 1,817 sq.ft. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: LA19-000094 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 4 Stormwater Total Area Allowed Proposed Overlay in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Hardcover District Tier Tier 1 8,014 s.f. 2,003.5 s.f. 3223 sq.ft. (40.22%) 3216 sq.ft (40.13%) (25%) w/in 75' w/in 75' Applicable Regulations: Variance (78-1680 and 78-1700) hardcover in the 75-foot setback and hardcover over 25% The property is located on the lake limiting the hardcover to 25%. However,the entire property is located within the 75' lake yard setback prohibiting hardcover. The zoning regulations eliminate a building envelope for the property. The applicant is proposing to add a 46 sq.ft breezeway addition connecting the garage to the home. The applicant is also proposing to add a 14x16 stairs and paver patio as hardcover. As part of the project the applicant will be removing hardcover in other areas of the property including part of an existing deck, concrete walkways and cone retaining walls.The overall hardcover of the property will decrease by 7 sq.ft. Variance (78-350) Rear yard setback The breezeway addition connecting the home and the detached garage eliminates the accessory building requirements. The garage is will now be considered part of the principle structure and those setbacks will apply. The house is currently set 42.4 feet where 30 feet is required. With the addition of the breezeway connecting the garage,the new rear yard setback is 17.4 feet where 30 feet is required. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Ordinance.The small lot includes difficulties in its double lake frontage, small size, and width. The additions will have no visual or massing impact on adjacent lots. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to improve this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. LA19-000094 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 4 a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit the additions to the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the dual frontage lakeshore creates difficulties.The hardcover level,and encroachments proposed within the side yard,street yard, and lakeyard appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The uniquely small size, location with respect to the lake and roadway, and required setbacks prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed hardcover level and setbacks are unique to the property; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of additions to the home which are designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property's substandard size,depth and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property unique with its dual frontage abutting a channel on Lake Minnetonka. It is substandard to size and depth eliminating a building envelope. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the requested variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. . The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. LA19-000094 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 4 The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that a number of the property characteristics are practical difficulties making development and improvement impossible. The substandard size and dual lakeshore frontage on the lake and abutting the channel eliminate any building envelope and any opportunities for property improvements without variances. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommend approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Narrative Exhibit G. Neighbor Acknowledgement Signature Exhibit H. Photos Exhibit I. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary (plication Date: 10/22/2019 Address: 1966 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1711723240024 Land Use Number: LA19-000094 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: RHONDA VIGNESS Address: 1966 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Name: David Burda Applicant: Company: Address: 1966 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 david.burda@cppna.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Mark Gronberg markg@gronbergassoc.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Breezeway, Sliding Door Steps & Patio Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application El Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application El Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary(1).pdfll1/15/2019 8:58:16 AM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000094 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: This home will be the permanent residence for my wife and I once all renovations are completed. All use will be in accordance with local zoning and ordinance rules. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property is unique in its proximity to the lake on the east side and the channel to the north. Exposure to boating traffic is constant. Creating private access to the house/garage through the breezeway creates a needed privacy and security. The addition of a lakeside sliding door entrance also allows for improved privacy, and ease of access, when going from house to lake/dock. The patio off of the sliding door provides usable outdoor space that is not right on top of the channel traffic. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The breezeway is to the far south of the property (furthest from the channel) thereby minimizing any visual impact. Both the breezeway and sliding door/patio are designed to enhance the overall character of the property and the area. Adding material improvements to the property (cultured stone, new windows, LP Smart Siding, etc.) improve the overall character of the location. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The request for variance is not based on economic considerations, rather the request is based on factors related to safety, convenience, privacy and usability of the property. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1167.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Approval of the variance for the requested enhancements to the property will help alleviate the 2 most prevalent issues with the property: safety and privacy. The breezeway provides safe passage between house and garage and the sliding door steps and patio provide much needed privacy for a property that is over-exposed based on proximity to one of the busiest channels on Lake Minnetonka. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The property is definitely unique which on one hand is part of the overall attractiveness but on Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pditl1/15/2019 8:58:16 AM] Letter View the other hand is also part of the concerns with privacy and safety. It is impossible to completely escape the channel boat traffic, which is only a few feet away from the access to the house. This request for variance is not intended to solve the boat traffic issue, but instead is intended to provide a few enhancements to make property more usable and safe. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: I cannot speak to the challenges of the other homes on Lake Minnetonka that are situated on a channel, but the channel on this property is very busy with only my house and the house across the channel being affected by the traffic. That said, the house across the channel is a bigger house on a bigger lot so the exposure of that house to the channel is not as substantial. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: One of the primary reasons that my wife and I bought this property was for the fantastic lake access that the property provides. However, the lake access from the house is currently over exposed by having to basically walk along the sloping yard along the channel to get to the dock. Approving this application for variance will provide much needed privacy in accessing the dock and the patio provides as much separation as is possible with this lot from boat traffic for relaxing and socializing. The breezeway is all about safety and privacy. The current set-up going from house to garage is uncomfortable in good weather and down right dangerous in poor weather due to the steps, the narrow space, the overhead power lines and the two doors that need to be locked and unlocked upon entry/exit. Enclosing the space alleviates these issues. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. sponse: Correct. These changes are purely for enhancing the safety, privacy and overall enjoyment of the property by me and my wife. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The breezeway helps to solve for the current safety and comfort issues when trying to move between 2 doors, 3 steps & cracked concrete in a narrow 6' of space during poor weather conditions as well as improving overall privacy and safety when going between house and garage. Also, the breezeway will provide protection from the main electrical service lines that run directly above the door to the house. Going from the house to the lake and dock right now requires you to walk out a door that is right on top of the channel and then you walk along a sloped lawn to get to the dock and lake. Adding a sliding door with 2 steps down to a flagstone and grass patio allows for direct private access to the lake and dock and the patio provides a much needed spot to visit and relax that is not exposed to the ongoing noise and commentary coming from the channel traffic. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdt111/15/2019 8:58:16 AMI CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR U g2 N u,DAVID BURDA €:4 OF LOT 36,"SHADY-WOOD" w o5 2 q \ HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA Qx il CHANNEL V tri g �w 0 E .- SEAWALL _ >w 0 SS asv _- _ - --5&55355 E ids ) t - — - ,ERS WTOMaNE.,.C�,,.�. 5„ ,,,,�„MI / s o E-, $10111.a ...-------\ 0 I I. O m 10) EXISTING g n o j \ €1 \ A Z ddd GARAGE p e.ewo,a sfro �J6 I\% \ 1 ' ' `L lot EXISTING / �\ '\ 1 n / $, i HOUSE I \ 16......, I � M1986) n O \ \ 1 m / n.a W 40 o �O �o) (r) / �� �� fAsP 1 (al • w(M) / 1 O Z \ 585.536.E 128.89 a -' �� /, I 2 \ r. EXISTING EXISTING r 9 \ ' GARAGE HOUSE N \._, \ , \ \ y \ I \ O \ \\ \ iii -73O \ III 11 —4:1)— 1BI 1 O i sE:.\ w I 0 10 20 40 s€Ei ,i \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: L______ slimisiiss H$ s \ Lot 36,"SHADY-WOOD" SCALE IN FEET This survey shows the boundaries and topography of the above described property, A \ and location of an existing house,garage,drive,and other visible"hardcover"thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. . NOTE:The boundaries on this survey are based on existing monuments found by us as well as information from a survey by Schoell and Madson dated 2/18/02 and to`3 may not agree with lines as shown on the plat of"SHADY-WOOD"as measured ZO1 from the section line by the North end of the plat. Fii p • :Denotes iron marker found(re-rod) --s.-- :Existing contour line IX CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND c)nN PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR z w„M DAVID BURDA woiv OF LOT 36,"SHADY-WOOD" Q g We \ CHANNEL HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Vpou LL sEAr,,�_ — — 7070.ccasnONs ro lora--- Q H W -S-85'753'55'E 1<� ` I li f' a...uE...E,.,EM .» .nes smn.:N n r, _� (. ^ I I . \ ' ■��l ai \4. W J mSss m—Pw __ n ZWI l — ,"a___ K ' _ —za. DECK b:aa �� =O « $ Er e \ g i areG . e $ m q i EXISTING .. r lp \IS S . GAIVGE 36 n•\ \i I. 8 j Ilor5. EXISTING ,q� \ \ g 4 I m I 2 HOUSE n�� I \ 1 1 �,< 5.r #1966 PI I \ m \ r1.0 (A) • r.IEVE( gill \ \ 1 iJ Q s (o)�' mo CZ..,, \\ II ' �!//�- ab3r 5 1 wvoo rf. Eaaeas:,. (7"'-' �� 1 O 1- \ ...\ s 85.5a'55.E 126.89 00 • ❑a-'- F \ EXISTING EXISTING i 1 \ (.9 GARAGE HOUSE ) 1 1 ,- kii s . — -,----------\ 37 \;l , tea. s \ \ j, o \ • a -,' o ISI lib zllA \ fl!; o\ 0 10 20 40 WI \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: rrrr �—~may ill 1' Lot 36,"SHADY-WOOD" SCALE IN FEET L T 0 This survey shows the boundaries and topography of the above described property, \ and location of an existing house,garage,drive,and other visible"hardcover"thereon. V It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. NOTE:The boundaries on this survey are based on existing monuments found by us as well as information from a survey by Schoell and Madson dated 2/18/02 and rn 2 may not agree with lines as shown on the plat of"SHADY-WOOD"as measured from the section line by the North end of the plat. OM o,. 01 1 • :Denotes iron marker found(re-rod) w o --aur-- :Existing contour line B �0 7a da 1966 Shadywood Road; 3-Season Breezeway Addition Between House & Garage Current View Looking South Towards Neighbor Current View Looking North Toward Channel ..i .... ,, .b ,, i ,1 miN111111111 7, 9,, x ' IIIMMIIIIMH—'"'— jill ---!-------- _.--- 'i 4 ______J-------' .._ 22.2' 2 .. t c ownV ._.. lik f w = r { CU tlo �,, a k. ,:.i f I, ,,,, li,. , 1 (7 �co �.. iiiini :,,i 1 .,t .' , '" , 0?J iti' I li'',, ' '14Allti: 't '1,11.11 ! t ' } itii CO -r ,4,1_1i � . o t S 4-1 CC Q CU N CU L m C O 4CU , M O - 1 a -1 - • CC O i z O > .v 13 Sills. CD (1., ---- x I 4 ;, 1966 Shadywood Road 3-Season Breezeway Addition Between House & Garage Step Set-Up Currently _ 6' House Garage Wall Wall Door Base ...—. Door Base Remodeled 6' House 4 Garage Wall Wall Door Base 1117,...41oor Base Lake Facing Wall Current *N it. _...r. .. -." r a , ...s,,,,.... A ..• J, ..s. A, itsmailisaississr,„ ...I ... .._ .-..- - , ---.,-..--, , 4rt , ......„ , ,....„, , ....„ . ‘ , .0 ,.I .7 f 1111 ii I __ Ia7 m i ® �_, TA ; FIIIIfit:iFt;>* LnLn y ,,�^ I o . ......- ..... .. , ..., ill ... CS N n I' 11 k 4 L. .."L- 'J II I ,o 1 1 : ' ! ' 1 i t ',', Cl. o Q. ;),. i MIMI:''. -,:; ,:7ft., ,,,,„..,,, ._,,,,, „.... :L„,,,„,..„,*,.:, v 0. � l I ME Q /7 !i� S ; 1 mi to fig( if ' NH $ , ,,: § f r t i y et;, it ..�� e--I } t i i�. fi tiZ. I II A IN �}: a ifd I. i L.() .4 ►H CO 13,0C U ea LL cu a) o - o co L J a City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address:(746 t 16"6 .fiehlAYGv„ c� R Jd� ( 0,9v/0 BziADA) 0e. Prepared by: Date: — p GROA/49ERG rt �OS,' c/AricJ”, /i/C_ 9-/3- /p Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) MIDI Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:tXISTING HAR OVE) in the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey g (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A WouSE /3/3 S.F. B GARAGE Y6-6 S.F. C et..rkrap 'A'1!/Fcf.M f 6" yei S.F. D r o,u c' c rE Lt,A Lk 2 73 S.F. E 16-r I/LGAR S ,?9 9 S.F. F AAvFR LA.rvp/.vr /6 S.F. G STEP P ER S /'f S.F. H r i i r/t BORDER /y S.F. I BA/r/( BoROEA 23 S.F. J STONE STEPS 4/2 S.F. K A"GAETS 2.40-4 4., / S.F. L E6ItF1J GvALL / S.F. M 4/c PAD 6 S.F. N EG.Q Fri Ltlt z.L / S.F. O co.vc. s'7'6-P /5 S.F. P ,44'Ei( CIACL6 3 S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover _ 322 ? S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): _ _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover O S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)) 3223 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 4B'7vE Q29_y pyW f ,,pi, .BCc-if Ftice.43- 70 it-if w,(cG $ 0/y S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) (4)] yo. 2 2 °/, (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono eaLv..oivo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: / y�� S//4 D YGVGoO `4kesHoa` Prepared by: , Date: RoN8E/W ,F A SSOC/^7-F,r` //t/c. /O-/7-/y Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1)Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: OPOSED HARDCOVER In the following to e, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total tuare Feet) ( q (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A NouSE EX/17/NGJ /3/ S.F. B GARAGE' // 93-8 S.F. C , BLA rk7pp /,11.16-44.14Y i/ 6 YY S.F. D /' (7-o BE ,Fr.at/EV) 2 73 S.F. E Oer/t f PILLARS " 399 -/l9 iiciA-G Etta akd 2 ao S.F. F /ALFA LANG/AIG /1 l6 S.F. G -4 -- k ' .#i Cra Bi- AFMovi-v) -1/- S.F_- H 'Rick BoADF'� r/ iy S.F. - i BR l r k AO/2 4 E R ', 2 3 - 5 A E i ivG ,P FM c v6P l$ S.F. J Tf.s. E' STFI r ,. 92 S.F. K JI Cro df RFMPvCej -I- S.F. L r ncc i. (rJ of Afilc4F0) -f- S.F. M A/c Awe /f 6 S.F. N /i --f- S.F. O C:o . STFP ../ /S S.F. P ,, , [Tp tIr RFS o v-4) -g-- S.F. Q PAOp4Sfd Ail/FA cc',ALK /yQ S.F. R , l°'GP01CP .5TF'pJ c5/ S.F. S loot CACi5c.? 02.4L/Fj2 "IA T/D /6. O S.F. T Awa/O.1'F-O etFF26-MA y y6' S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover ) 31 /6 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 32/6 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area $'014' S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] c'O. /3 % Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 1966 Shadywood Drive The Burda's My wife and I are thrilled to be a part of the Orono community on beautiful Lake Minnetonka. After months of searching for a suitable retirement house,we found the property at 1966 Shadywood Road. We visited the property multiple times throughout last summer including weekdays,weekends and holidays. There were always 2 consistent themes with the home no matter when we visited: the property location and home design have tremendous potential; and the channel boat traffic is constant. My wife and I will be investing heavily to improve the overall appearance of this highly visible property to include replacing all the windows, removing the aluminum siding and replacing with cultured stone and more natural siding, replacing heaved and cracked concrete with attractive paver stones, removing cracked and settled asphalt with pavers and removing crushed rock landscape with grass and plantings. We are asking for permission to also improve the overall safety, usability and accessibility of the property by adding a 3-season breezeway between the house and garage and adding steps from the sliding door to a new flagstone and grass patio—all being completed with a net reduction in hardcover. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) 0\‘C."V-s-QA -- (Y1 IS 31\kC.L of 4,,. c9O��C7 (N s3 1 [print name(s)] [prinV address] \ have revviieAwed thg plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at tL- also referred to as Land Use Application No./9i.O6l53? I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. - Z1- ICI Property Own r Date N 14- Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application—January 2017 Page 15 • 441 4 •.} . ... 00111.4‘ s ill iii. F zttlal` • 1 + • -',,,\ \,_, • �, F ii 0 (,e . aT „i...;; ( J +' mss": , ?` ' j r.: ., $$€, . arm kO.AI ,:ej,,,,",„f:1*;:,,:‘ '. 2„. S;, a� ue ' r x.. V - .. - + • .» „,,.. .-f,..4.,; + ' It,' c 4 ri4'!""'.*' *it.1 4 5�\ ; �� � T F YF 'fi Y ot c f � x y 3 1 } 1 � T .. .. ,, ,,,,,,),?,di .....,":1: „„,,,, „if , t � irk ” v '^ eW`,._$ 3 R1!. •s d�� ,.°2-1.'!1'..‘-'--t 1'.. • orb ',. Lida # , , rd`s '_" i + t . r. , s .r, , > 7; *. ar.-§age . .. #. t , ';'-,7,74..,,1-',.,, ... i ki,-.,,,•:°-;'-'::.•..41."1,4:-,!: S _,y t Vi i /, �`: ,r�r cp.#' p ,. ; 1,,Zip4,-:,,.,1,..,'",1—' '� � i3 ..-.,.;,—,:t+°::„.,- ,., �', z� e 'd` + .U g fi r,rte` a --i• , d ___. ., _ „...,,- ,. _, ,,,- ,f,„,, - ii... ' Y a -t:. .: ftieleeN,t,'.t-,'-j ,i_il-'r,1,;„'1.,l.1'1. R 4, 17:fiti'l:.,'''I''.4'11; .? x 'i .__ tel �i` 'I I i i , 7.!''-'!:1,i.',1 ii - t 11 r p 7 ;. ' ., 1"-ti#(. .,i ', -''' r i r ''''Pt,,,:„':. w t - ', . �I 1 [ jn 1. test Y • "444t4,., ' 4''''';:' '''''''Y r.r .. .- ... - a ` t. i. • F' • rJ �9 a¢r } a ,p1 11 #r I. . WO Y i w4j RUN DATE:10/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 17 17-117-23 31 0003 38 17-117-23 24 0023 38 17-117-23 31 0013 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC WILLIAM KENNETH MELIN DAVID CHARLES ZOSCHKE TRUST 3731 SUNSET DR 1940 SHADYWOOD RD 2040 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC WILLIAM KENNETH MELIN DAVID CHARLES ZOSCHKE 3746 SUNSET DR 1940 SHADYWOOD RD JUDY KAY ZOSCHKE SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 2040 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 17 17-117-23 31 0045 38 17-117-23 24 0024 MSP HOLDINGS LLC DAVID BURDA&CYNTHIA BURDA 3701 SUNSET DR 1966 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 MSP HOLDINGS LLC DAVID E BURDA 670 TONKAWA RD CYNTHIA J BURDA ORONO MN 55356 19495 TOWERING OAKS TR PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 17 17-117-23 31 0049 38 17-117-23 24 0025 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC MICHAEL MISCHKE 3746 SUNSET DR 1972 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC MICHAEL MISCHKE 3746 SUNSET DR 1972 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0004 38 17-117-23 24 0026 W R OMLIE&R T OMLIE BRIAN PETERS REVOC TR ETAL 1880 SHADYWOOD RD 1978 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM R&RHONDA T OMLIE BRIAN PETERS 1860 SHADYWOOD RD 1978 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0013 38 17-117-23 24 0027 MARK J KOSEK JEFFREY VONFELDT&E M WYATT 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1990 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 MARK J KOSEK JEFFREY J VONFELDT 1875 SHADYWOOD RD ELAINE M WYATT WAYZATA MN 55391 1990 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0014 38 17-117-23 24 0028 GABRIEL JABBOUR REV TRUST JANET E SOLTAU TRUSTEE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1998 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 GABRIEL JABBOUR JANET E SOLTAU 220 TONKA BAY RD 1998 SHADYWOOD RD TONKA BAY MN 55331 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0019 38 17-117-23 31 0001 M D LUNDBERG&A D LUNDBERG SCOTT M ROSS 1890 SHADYWOOD RD 2000 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL&ANGELA LUNDBERG SCOTT M ROSS 1890 SHADYWOOD RD 2000 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0020 38 17-117-23 31 0002 MEGAN TULLY MCMANUS R W&C M KOZICKY 1910 SHADYWOOD RD 2016 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MEGAN TULLY MCMANUS RICHARD W KOZICKY 1910 SHADYWOOD RD 2016 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0021 38 17-117-23 31 0011 J&B L GASTERLAND S R PALMER&J R PALMER 1920 SHADYWOOD RD 2024 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JAN P GASTERLAND SCOTT R PALMER 1 133 THORN ST JAYNE R PALMER ST PAUL MN 55106 2024 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 24 0022 38 17-117-23 310012 DAVID A ELMQUIST C G WOLF&K S WOLF 1930 SHADYWOOD RD 2032 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID A ELMQUIST CHRISTOPHER G WOLF 1930 SHADYWOOD RD KIMBERLY S WOLF WAYZATA MN 55391 2032 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/23/2019 44, �: a� ,- ter- .r •rik 1 ''s A Y7' 4 '' 2 ' 11. s _ Vii.. a , f ME . .:-.-'....,_''-lit'."'''''''''''';:44: l'1#1;1'itiAigNii-,f-f,:'!',.T1::,,,..:1 TN'',147"; i F L f Y' y Ti:„igrogiNt }.. V-,77:-.,7,,,,i..9,314.14tAt.,_ :'I N •4+�1'�h ; .r.'rP3y�4- I{;` ms's iimi_ _ -'‘.3..„, . ,_� J'�c �';7` r.R � tt' .� �r.- mak. - l i 44 • __.a..,::,„iti„1. till., .:_ tir. 1}41 'F,-3 i ailtittvilu;-.;*iti;:„..-,,,,14,!: i'S ;•'r '-f _ *.,„ E-:::::-4-0.. --2411414.0- :_,:..,..:Iew_ ,,,x.„.. . ,e40,•,%, ,4,X,e. ,1::7-Its:?:.1, ';-'44.4*M4j444,T1. Nallt:;) A-24.A i _iaz Ei , may* lip .��� -:�� <_. 5 1 . 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOI oppro... „....it.::.,7:..,.,_:, , - Ilk. i - 3 3 park iiiifriiirisiif�l Yrrii•isiri iiiiii itil[Mi iii iii iai i+Fiiiii Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I i I i I 1966 ShadyWOOd Road This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (w)is fumishedwithnowarranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepn County steal rat be liadefor anydamage,injury or loss resulting from this da a. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Off ce 300 6th Street So uth,Minneapolis,MN 55487/g s.nfo@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 10.21.2019 *kEs Date Application Considered as Complete:11.7.2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: 1.6.2020 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission MembersDustin Rief, City AdministratorHa� From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: November 18,2019 Subject: LA19-000095, Gordon James, 2927 Casco Point Road,Variances and IUP, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot width and average lakeshore setback variance and an IUP for hauling over 500 cubic yards of material. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to construct a new home forward of the average lakeshore setback on a substandard narrow lot. The average lakeshore setback is unique for this property due to the neighboring lot to the north,the home on that lot is setback from the lake over 200 feet. This distance creates an average lakeshore setback line that cuts through the subject parcel at a sharp angle. The applicant is proposing the new home that will extend over the ALS 41 feet (13 on the narrow end)The existing home encroaches 43/35, respectively). The new home will be roughly set 10 feet farther away from the lake then the current home. The applicant is also requesting an Interim Use Permit to haul roughly 600 cubic yards of material to and from the site to better serve the proposed home. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Street 30' 75' 161' Side (north) 7.5' 9.7' 7.5' Side (south 7.5' 17.5' 7.5' Lakeshore 75' 138.4' 151' Average Lakeshore Not Met* Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 25,152 s.f. (0.57 acre) 53' @ 75'/51' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 25,152 s.f. (0.57 acre Allowed: 5,030.4 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 3,281 s.f. (13%) LA19-000095 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 6 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Proposed Overlay District in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Hardcover Tier 6,288 s.f. 7178 s.f. 342 6,288 342 Tier 1 25,152 s.f. (25%) (28.5°A) w/in s.f. w/in 75' (24.97%) 75' *328 sq.ft of riprap was removed from the submitted hardcover calculations. Applicable Regulations: Variance (78-1279)Average Lakeshore Setback The applicant is proposed new home forward of the setback line. The current home encroaches into the setback due to the location of the home on the abutting northern property which creates an extreme setback line. The property to the north is set back from the lake 210 feet from the OHWL. Neighboring properties in the area are set roughly 150 feet back from the OHWL. The applicant is proposing to build the home roughly 151 feet from the OHWL. The proposed home will be roughly 10 feet back from the OHWL(138.4'), improving the average lakeshore setback and getting closer to conforming to the unique setback. Variance (78-350 and 78-72) Lot Width Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer;and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for average lakeshore setback variance results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above.Therefore, lot width variances are required in order to redevelop the property.The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties LA19-000095 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 6 also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The lot includes difficulties in its substandard width and location of the adjacent homes. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop of nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of a new home on a substandard lot forward of the ALS appears to be reasonable based on the neighboring home's orientation with respect to the lakeshore. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The nonconforming lot width and neighboring home location were not created by the homeowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for the Owners in redeveloping the property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's nonconforming size and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the owners. LA19-000095 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 6 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot width and average lakeshore variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested lot width and average lakeshore setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variances for lot width and average lakeshore set setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit(Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; the proposed grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis;the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However,activity of exporting approximately 600 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise,dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated.Trucks hauling material shall observe the speed and traffic laws and provide on site traffic control to improve safety. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public; the property owner, builder, and contractors will be responsible for keeping debris off of the LA19-000095 November 18,2019 Page 5 of 6 public roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey will be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds due to the nature of the lot and the applied setbacks there are practical difficulties supporting granting the lot width variance, average lakeshore setback variance and IUP for construction of a new home. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map LA19-000095 November 18,2019 Page 6 of 6 Letter View Land Use Application Summary (plication Date: 10/23/2019 Address: 2927 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723310049 Land Use Number: LA19-000095 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: MICHAEL B BARRY Address: 1121 N W 115TH AVE PLANTATION, FL 33323 Name: John Quinlivan Applicant: Company: Gordon James Construction P Address: 5159 Main Street Suite 200 Maple Plain, MN 55359 john@gordon-james.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance Request Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision 0 Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary.pdf[11/15/2019 9:02:52 AM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000095 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property will fit in with the character of the neighborhood. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The plight of the homeowner is unique because the neighboring house is setback much deeper than most of the homes in the neighborhood. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. It will fit in with the existing homes. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: This application is to insure the new home fits the character of the neighborhood. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: NA 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: NA 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: NA 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The property adjoining this property has a home that is set back further than most homes in the neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Most home are located in the area share the same general setback. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdf1l1/15/2019 9:02:52 AM] Letter View Response: The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. . The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, )rals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. If approved, the home will be located with approx. the same setback as most homes in the area. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form.pdf[l 1/15/2019 9:02:52 AM] ,.. I , , gi I! g r anh OIL , ;P Ilkil!!!! f i .'=' r. Ilk ;1 , i'0100,E44!1/1100g8P1 z o fi I ii g .1 i4 61,1 il ill! -.'grA 'g'6.666 •zii..7; ii N51,,W26§§§gos , . ' r.,. 0 IIIITIIMI ,. .. H il - •, : ° ' 12111111H1111 t 6 1 ,-'-'-" ''' II] gli„ f, = 1 `.. - 15 / 1°U 1 !, - t1V- i q I 1 '''1.. it sO:mloce.viocime..mwo.temexpiwo E, i 0 WI; ! Hi ""''' 'P,,i- P Iiiii i i i I t .* - . •• -§ A a-rr, fl r. ' ' 1C'G „4VNFROW2"td8R..g A; 66W5 Atili 1;1"1"14'HUHIqggIERSPAil 61 li"A i i 6A '6, An 0,4! " ' li ' a".XXxx.1.10-AgnmeeepoeV,EWMaleMem. li . W '!. .q i ? I 1 i _l' 1==.111121:1 il i i 'ta i 4 ', '''. -Hifi ! l 1 0 o ii i ! 23-. 3 5 .1; P Z co i ow ., g w Z \ \ \ cs 1 H`AA 6 WA' —R 7' D, \ \ 0' .1S7 .. ./ \ o A /,' w t.'"" ' \ \ -,i2 , ':cf;‘.a's. '''. \ \ 1.11 / : , /..• / ,\ -\\ a. \ i Va is W 4, . . ea- .-, • i ..., ) \,. \, . - \ \ i T,t i-- \•%, ec.,\ 'A A.\S. T .": ( A \ \ X (%) : -*Q,-7 - \\\:' \ ‘-'-' ., 4'''. \ \ ., \ / '...e (`; - \ \ ''...„ :2 °.•, r• 3- , •,-% -,-N\ 3., ,.*•••.,4°' ,'' -0,,. \ ,-... 't„ ,gY s \ Vi -- . ' , • \ ,- ,,, • .,,,,k,,k,No , Ap, \ As .,.. \ \.„, •., ,-;s \ --' __ "N--, ,`,, . . i ..5,/ / N7° vri''' \,- X' \:V 4, ''' `a., ., \ i• \: °, , \ ' 4' '' .. \-:'\\ % ' ' tri;./.. •,:`". , - %..,. , , \'\,. "% 'IA I, /‘'\ .„_,.„_ta z' ca "4. 'N' '''Z'rt:''''a 1 6a.,,6• . :0'\,..: \•,,* '0,,'6( ;A:-.,:'f'.:'-':'A:—VAa '', . ,,' i :6 '''• A, ' / .-,r e.01. ___,•%,tl,^:* ',,..,::::a7PA 69.,,,N,.N-64,/ -1, \ q \ _. .-..!\•,it• .,3, .444 i _, '-,-'''_ ,t, :\ 454':;-., 50..` .4:-A!.‘'.,ti,k. --'. v - 0 -,6',64't. ')4, /A. ,A114: it, - ,,,,i)e'. : . A ,,' \ \ 'A 4,16,---• E ',---:.- -' •_,,--0,Zt," ,- - *!. ''''/ •"4'• ,,. z -'••• • -;,-`, ",0 + '4,' N?. ''-')\ .::;%',..1‘" 'S\4it'\\ \ \ ‘.' //," ''S ,...N , ,,,,, . -- -,...- ,,,,,, x" e,,,,,,,,-•,,. ..v.. -z'._ „,, ..:,,,„ ,,,,n*--,,j,1-.-4- \ _.--- \ \ 4/..'4/ ,. —• ,,,, , ,k,\ zi.,..:-.-- - vgbkN; vt. 49., C %, . = / • ''''. ) e ,1463.V '''A (\iat\tq \\ ' — / / .. \ ' --/ ' ' '4 • \A- 6• )1r, ...,..• ' vses, af 4, ..‘,4/ ; ',c C,,A` '? C —— '' ‘•/ ,--:-X X #,''''. /\ :.-----_ , NOW 45 \ ,, ,,,,, ° r'A. , _ ___,:ls, / 'A /4 , •: / , c/..,,4. , -__ iN "- /- -----A--. -) • VC,„0.:44-.4?P"-'-i-,1,--- // 241PiN \ '•,.1, .., •• - N., / ',L(----- ..-. - \g'' jts, •,/,'-, ., '4,- ' •••!*. \,-//,;-;',„Z, -773/3, h'1!!dglii \ ,<<.3, / '% `u ''.% / f10;1: Y;),`•(,/,(---; '-0‘ ilDIV ith',EN%i 4'41 , c 's Or- // /' •7/'/( e- ',,-, ' ;•ii%' tFil:IV N n'6' ' -4 / \ >,,- -,.. ''''.• / 2(7/.,. 1..A..6).1 .% / \ V 2;,' / 5,! \ ': ///",,,,,,,,, 4,-,* \/ .''X/ ii °I4rr•\ / V't,•!-NN, 1!-7.00e.!-- \\ 14 / — ;(7;;/yr/0-4r / \ / -T-) //,'/I 7k'i :.0. .,> % ilti, ,,,, – ,i, ,./k, %- ge 4,A* / \ -, /. / -v;'. ::/i% `S ,.. 4, .:3,,•-;2?„ \ is .-gr -I-, ••!3:• i --hN.,! % z %,f s% ,• , • , - •, Z ' V'• • FIAPA! / :,/ /3 �` `\ q„,, r`j \\ °,km.o,.rm1..°,k.v.me M„n.m..°rte , wn.r.msNws.,°w„ : r---°a rt T C7 am" a'' d , \4,. / / N;:c A.:., \ '\ / 1 � l \ "i° ,fie• di' pe , 'd° .(— fir/ / °,p° S'�4 "°, NN""JJ'"/i J \ ,,,°.....n...,°. .°� .....7 b ...,,m.,,° 7,„M m..m,,k,..M n / " °". l b l' W / \ / /\ .�,;,, 'a ai `--� a>'1 `A,ih .fix /'r \�'43,L'b\\ •• — f .,:'05 / / / F s R Z7#,,,,, X'/ °C\_ ' R L; / / N `! 5i2 09'13 E / / ® .—sea o / N\ ;',' \ a> ,� �,\,�� /� ll ). s° \;\1., 4.33/ M ..r.—'. �, ., , / •�,,a/I .l // \ .' ,e-,,,•,,,) , °� \\A / \ 1` e 4. \(/+J` /• 1/fi' /n oae>' k y`\\\\� / / \\ /;II lull.�/l \\.� ,f• \ dr/ �.): I' \r eu I ,'. :1003. x.8 \ / / / ii lull �y S \�° '�4'"°a 44:0 t,::�y \ i�� T�i �F / r° "°4 f -- .,-",.0'\0 . ,\''t I I11I �\ �\ \`\' .'`',.- \" ` \\ y r fi x -' / 4\'�\\\\Y\\'+.\\�\, �\�� —�tf \ ,i�4ai.\\k,%� \ �° am ` y ...1,,,„,. ;, / _ - ,Tr-P, ,f&, 10e— '\..--;-..`" '''k)\•?:'.. ,b4 --../ V 't",==.4Zo"r":6:717 ,. tea \\\ °>\\0\_-, ...,&fid, ,...\\-N;7•5 4. + ,�ti ,—.5'. r o 10 20 M , ��\x���= _ -\:,F,� ^`\\a 8 o 7 —� SURVEY LEGEND o SCALEI\PEE, 40 FEE EMS/FLOOR ELEVADON MIMEO,MOMMENT SET 10 UM STATION TOP TOP Cr FOOMDMION E.EV /OE LOWEST MERINO ELEV ,''''' Z MEADE,MOMS.MEMO• SANITMY MANHOLE P 1 CONCRETE CONCRETE 048 ti sk .11 ..,, \\we..„,„,' \/ / ELECTRIC TRANSOM," TREE CORM:WM REMOVED—DI—DEAN TEL —M— wo „o WATER NUM �j • \ IR PCS/DEDICATOR VWVE 0- RAIU1•11 ma. / ROLE e ew am ®sm WPM $ wc*Ewo.,%,' sw 11:.7t,',==%7:,"..".:177.74:7.—°°"--""°'—""'—'"'"''''''''''"' TW0112 wE23-SEE p FILE No CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 3138.25 SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC. PREPARED FOR: ",o oM�u.e �Na,.„.,\A. 4.-ti .� IN .SOUT BROA, WA.u..MN 55201 052,1760ORONO, / MINNESOTA GORDON TAMES CONSTRUCTION / 1. a .....,...:,..,... ;..-....\ .' •:.::::.:::.:...•.:::....•....E:.:::.1r.!::i..:.:.:i......:;:i.:::::!.. ' Z :,-.7‘ ......;:!;:!;..:%; pri7•1 IIM".El 1 6= lio FM ligigliligil , -.-' -'.-..-.--'.....IN VII ''..V....... Pirri 2"1. I it' 1111111111 IP.1 !11P. nev �isn '� CSI : �. ' N I! •11".08.1 ►' ( �'.!_mII, lime 1 Ir_ We- i 141:11:1:11:11711 i1°'i •eil•- '� IIr ISI / ! is :a✓ qrn lelO l I 4 I�� I�idlr 4u01 r lil Ite:i•i:rnRI D h oo 'fir': D n::.:_ria;7:-� : :!:;_4' O _ I73 66 O 1 Jm .1•..' fD asz 1. ® �. . �... 1i �• ii °'• VD 101110 .8m 1 ow i 01_ _El 00 r _ C„I=I I:°: 111 ,l 11 . I I Cm1 := . 1 : 1_ ' R ,t fiki E hi � -3f-k 11110 F1) $ CI jI 1 .w 1'01 "4. 1 7 I Ei3 ::!....:!!.. ili:....!:. ...:....iii, D 4 ~gg Es 4 5 ADAMS RESIDENCE �JJI D.F.P. 3 E 7 2927 CASCO POINT ROAD ( O1dO° u.us�na+ixeo use aF U� �7 o !— " cr,=.,T'0,7; E ``-/gip PLANNING d DESIGN ORONO MINNESOTA ss W.A s k. II ......non...K .....w..... ti. `N�JI30 R �JNINNVId vo �� sauwc VIOS3NAID[ ONOHO wcra ion ie b"Y psoJ OV02I J.NIOd 00SY0 LZ6Z �A 'tN "_ da lJ� s�.��°ti�,o.o �� ��I�I�QIS�2I SNi�Q� a � r N IIID y z ° I ' r r, € _1 ii ill i"ia! l ijili 1 •R:iiL� a a 2� 11 E: �FkB° dgid �, a�a pi z 1 I2 iii ;',,LEFT$! PN 10.11= `aail$fil / I Hih;Iiiii W1 !fiii 14 i i' 4 gg II aR-:1 �b 1 I <�� ¢ `arp y41 I`1I1;; $1 4al`a�9 :il IIt ra./ liai t�y4& ltls W O- U. r-1 �I 9�� � ,, ii 2 �I :1" I ® I =--tilI t 6 [ x mow. c i 71 is 0 © i iI : I—I .,! NI.I 1 V I Z I I, t Ll 1- 1 a hn Ir I 1 4 0110-Ft•MI yin I 1 a r VL .1 is 0 L-� u u Z J0 ,_.,,,_, .,:i_s_ ,„ .r.,.„.. tea. Q 1 R O W O, Q0_ =1,.._,, ,„ ec' 90,1" fI faM 1====. 11=11 { D >� --6� . Pi;!I' --- 1! C) {' Nk o - X r { i s ,,••• I 4 i_ .ar ..4 m.' we 1 qui, „ it- 1' 111114111E/1111. rw 2 iIf J e y' rce air H' ia,. .v 'tiii 11 `_ _/am - 1` 1. lJU744 ylg'r .v = is X i i1 y.r ri.• r Ir 1 i � - 2 Iilu u & PIO MI L L —r A 0,;.4 ,,,,, ,. , , 1 ,,, -\. r,. ,-. : ' ,..-1 6,1 t 1- ri as l — %r — © W' L:__ 411ar .ar , 1441/14 rFrIi .1, .� it Ari IP1 19! r141zii1$igill i 1 i 11 11; 1 3 1gr Aaa{ spt•; I I ° iiii ik 1Allr MI 5 a ���� El 4 ADAMS RESIDENCE _ o=GN4WP,WIIG.LESIW D.F.P. r0 1 c 2927 CASCO POINT ROAD Plan A� V.Vg'go I �Y ( [ cuuis.via..iauarM �� PLANNING d DESIGN ORONO MINNESOTA 5 m sM�. II" ,.o.25,71.,. uh w.....%.�. ., NDIS30 V DNINNVld »�s�9 eownvx uopao Ov0t1 JIIIOd OOSVO LZBZ �� � dna p '° »b�ao 0 51 ao1�iaQISa2I SNtvQv ob is 0 3 o ) El ll y eill L. 8318 di i tF sey 0 i r.i§ xn b.. 1 s - a E o •>n i � —i � �kg� n t 01 ®- h g i i ,ii hid LL .E., 1 E igi 11 b 4i 1 �ea4111 Ir! • t J N 'u City of Orono ���� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet y� �'� Property Address: 2927 Casco Point Road (4xESHOQ"` Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 8/14/2019 SB Job Number: 31380-025 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 1,453 S.F. B Garage 522 S.F. C Bituminous 3760 S.F. D Concrete 216 S.F. E Pavers 276 S.F. F Concrete 138 S.F. G Concrete 32 S.F. H Pavers 53 S.F. I Pavers inside 75'OHW Setback 32 S.F. J Stairs inside 75'OHW Setback 98 S.F. K Pavers inside 75'OHW Setback 212 S.F. L Rip Rap inside 75'OHW Setback 328 S.F. M Pavers 386 S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. 0. S.F. R -- S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Existing Hardcover 7,506 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3)Net Existing Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 7,506.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 25,152 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 29.84% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. City of Orono ���'0 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ��� Property Address: 2927 Casco Point Road (41(4SHOR�' Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist Date: 8/14/2019 SB Job Number: 31380-025 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle One) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:Proposed HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of Proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict Proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House Removed 0 S.F. B Garage Removed 0 S.F. C Bituminous Removed 0 S.F. D Concrete Removed 0 S.F. E Pavers Removed 0 S.F. F Concrete Removed 0 S.F. G Concrete Removed 0 S.F. H Pavers Removed 0 S.F. I Pavers inside 75'OHW Setback 32 S.F. J Stairs inside 75'OHW Setback 98 S.F. K Pavers inside 75'OHW Setback 212 S.F. L Rip Rap inside 75'OHW Setback 328 S.F. M Pavers Removed 0 S.F. N Proposed House 3204 S.F. O Stoop 77 S.F. P BBQ Patio 38 S.F. Q Upper Patio 84 S.F. R Proposed Driveway 2503 S.F. S Sidewalk 32 S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)Total Proposed Hardcover 6,608 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): L Rip Rap inside 75'OHW Setback 328 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2)Total Excludable Hardcover 328 S.F. (3)Net Proposed Hardcover[Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 6,280.00 S.F. (4)Total Lot Area 25,152 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage[(3)+(4)] 24.97% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover.Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. N, \\ - _-'''1' r.:-'. ,�, -- , tYe i t _ - f ' t :11 - k ism!-, .' .a ,._ ?+:"► 'P'i .� ,s' 4 1 x � .� s • jsi. rt' « j. t-, '‘t ' * ,i--- ' ;--i, 44 rA„-+/-"-s- ''' ,-*--;--oir 44".-1 = i' / Y" g i 1 . s :,...,. ,. J 44060 , .,,tk , , . _. ' T 4 y r. 4,..,,,,', -, 4 g-0--44*': ',,rV ' ':* ....' 1......."'.*.t. '''' acts. ' q.t; /M? - a. - €- J , . • '+n $ am, € +` err . ; )0 Ihis q - -4,,, � Tri 2 •a t. « _. - • ; :*fir :b: \ ' ' » > € ' s Y. tat iS a E r I " * kms={ ,•,s ,'- _ Y ,,,,......,,,.. . "v. , dE ..., fes*Vi`a,,.„. s- ._. ,,,*; r.• ...„,,,,.. :,..„.:*,=* ... ....., -...,, .,,?., �r �, r . .. r ,,' ;� -I--,- / .,.,. . , ...„.- likc.,---- \c.:.°,k / ‘ '..V' .."' 7 3 ",t. ',7/. 0, $J . \ t,ars- • � A.;, e!.'''',. 1111 A'. S � .. -�k`. key". 4i ,/• •%' y / • _• '✓ . fi ,• •rasr4`[+ �k' i r t o ' I € �% .�s „ ,t ` • 5 i Fd. // - ff: \A k_ *� i/ Lf' si /y i-, '� r / _ 4� .�. 3 3x� U ` 4 !' \ �, !of - t f 3 r / 0. .,e,\ . A, ' .It c 1„, '• / . r ' t /fj / // ., " // 5 r` i,� dwt�' \ \ .1 ,)',fi 1°° � , .1 � d• M F F '} `` / ;�/ s /y \ .•' . r AICA101. • r s A , ,ik\ y t11L 4 ' .. • f` 1. ,, t_ ' . ,t,".‘ I- \ ,-,-- , . . ,,,...„ 1y � ' t e' � 1 r fes. r $ . RUN DATE:10/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 31 0002 38 20-117-2331 0031 38 20-117-23 31 0042 ROY SCHRADER ET AL W/L EST DAVID J PICHOTTA JONG DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2914 CASCO POINT RD 3600 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DONALD SCHRADER DAVID J PICHOTTA JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN 3704 CASCO AVE 2914 CASCO POINT RD 4700 COVEY TR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MEDINA MN 55340 38 20-117-2331 0004 38 20-117-23310032 38 20-117-23 31 0043 C A SPRINGMAN&J F KLICK EMMA LOU POWELL SUSAN C STIELOW REV TRUST 3703 CASCO AVE 2916 CASCO POINT RD 3650 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOHN F KLICK EMMA LOU POWELL SUSAN C STIELOW 3703 CASCO AVE 2916 CASCO PT RD 3660 FORT CHARLES DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 NAPLES FL 34102 38 20-117-23 31 0005 38 20-117-23 31 0033 38 20-117-23 31 0045 R PRESLER/E J PRESLER TRSTES PAULA N D KANNE/RYAN G KANNE NEIL GOODWINBARBARA GOODWIN 3709 CASCO AVE 2920 CASCO POINT RD 2975 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT PRESLER PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE NEIL GOODWIN/BARBARA GOODWIN 3709 CASCO AVE RYAN G KANNE 2975 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 2920 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0020 38 20-117-23 31 0034 38 20-117-23 31 0047 PENNY J SAIKI JONATHAN A MENTH MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR 2874 CASCO POINT RD 2930 CASCO POINT RD 2941 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PENNY J SAIKI JONATHAN A MENTH MICHELLE WILLIAMS-ABBOTT TR 2874 CASCO POINT RD 2930 CASCO POINT RD 2941 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0021 38 20-117-23 31 0035 38 20-117-23 31 0048 CITY OF ORONO R G SORENSEN/S D SORENSEN NANCY G BROWN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2940 CASCO POINT RD 2933 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO ROBERT G SORENSEN NANCY G BROWN P 0 BOX 66 STACI D SORENSEN 2933 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 2940 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0022 38 20-117-23 31 0036 38 20-117-23 31 0049 CITY OF ORONO PAUL F JOHNCOX DON ADAMS&SHEILA ADAMS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2948 CASCO POINT RD 2927 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO PAUL F JOHNCOX DON ADAMS&SHEILA ADAMS P 0 BOX 66 2948 CASCO POINT RD 2927 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0023 38 20-117-23 31 0038 38 20-117-23 31 0050 PENNY 3 SAIKI EDWARD PEKARIK JR TERRY PETERSEN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2990 CASCO POINT RD 2925 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PENNY J SAIKI ED PEKARIK JR TERRY PETERSEN 2874 CASCO POINT RD 2990 CASCO POINT RD 18077 ELM TRL ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 NEVIS MN 56467 38 20-117-23 31 0026 38 20-117-23 31 0039 38 20-117-23 31 0051 STEVEN G SIGAFOOS ETAL ROY SCHRADER ET AL W/L EST ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN 2900 CASCO POINT RD 3704 CASCO AVE 2915 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEVEN G SIGAFOOS DONALD SCHRADER ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN 2900 CASCO PT RD 3704 CASCO AVE 2915 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 310027 38 20-117-23 31 0040 38 20-117-23 31 0052 CITY OF ORONO J W DONGOSKE/P A DONGOSKE TODD M BALAN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3700 CASCO AVE 2905 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JAMES W&PATRICIA DONGOSKE TODD M BALAN P 0 BOX 66 3700 CASCO AVE 2905 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0028 38 20-117-23 31 0041 38 20-117-23 31 0053 ANGELA L WILSON PETER M GRAFFUNDER GREGGORY SMITH/MELANIE SMITH 2910 CASCO POINT RD 3630 CASCO AVE 2895 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ANGELA L WILSON PETER M GRAFFUNDER GREGGORY A SMITH 2910 CASCO POINT RD 3630 CASCO AVE MELANIE S SMITH WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2895 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:10/23/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 20-117-23 31 0054 38 20-117-23 31 0067 L D&K E ELSEN DAVID B ADAMS 2879 CASCO POINT RD 2868 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 LAWRENCE D&KATHERINE ELSEN DAVID B ADAMS 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0055 38 20-117-23 31 0072 ALYSSA M DWYER/ERIC BIERMANN M D BARRETT&D M BARRETT 2917 CASCO POINT RD 2912 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN MICHAEL D BARRETT 2917 CASCO POINT RD 2912 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0056 38 20-117-23 31 0073 R E WOLFE SAMUEL BLANKENSHIP 2871 CASCO POINT RD 2918 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 R E WOLFE SAMUEL BLANKENSHIP 2871 CASCO POINT RD 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0058 38 20-117-23 34 0023 D R WELTY&M M JIN CASCO POINT LLC 3721 CASCO AVE 2987 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 D R WELTY&M M JIN CASCO POINT LLC 3721 CASCO AVE 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0060 38 20-117-2334 0027 J A MARTINSON ET AL TRUSTEES CASCO POINT LLC 2970 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JERRY&BONNIE MARTINSON CASCO POINT LLC 2970 CASCO POINT RD S 2987 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0061 38 20-117-23 42 0006 J R MILLER&A R MILLER HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2980 CASCO POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JONATHAN R&AMY R MILLER HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2980 CASCO POINT RD NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN WAYZATA MN 55391 LAKE MTKA 38 20-117-23 31 0062 D ERICKSON&K ERICKSON 2740 CAROLINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL D ERICKSON KRISTA M ERICKSON 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-2331 0063 C A SWENSON&B B SWENSON TR 2965 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 CLIFFORD A SWENSON BARBARA B SWENSON 1346 PONCE DE LEON DR FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 38 20-117-23 31 0064 T J OARE&L M D OARE 2967 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TIMOTHY JOHN OARE LESLIE MARIE DENNIS OARE 2967 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23310065 CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 THE CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/23/2019 _,,,Iiir -..,r/ ,r.5,:it,,„!,-,:: ., ,-,,,, } ,i h.ii i3/46.40k,4 4. :.. ...,.......00'' .*. * ' 414/pIN\hmeniniminumiiiiiiiL... II 44461 *11111‘1Nlitt4"41,,, i 4... x . 1111111L fit,. r` AlatP =.4'-177.:1'111'.*::::-.,1 , r,;.'4-4,', ` . '. Ery r 'i5 1 - .,yr+x q"iG w ik!5S. 1,4,7 r a:.: p ': - to '' ggia i X5.3 8 ,. ? y} � ?d, ti� IIIPPPFP- 1111111.'"-.1/..„.'114:1;;E::::4-11 � 1000, rn 9 ,,,,,kiriav-4 ;Y;:tii4.4.;4'4:41;4-;;14,:t;.ritc4:4:44,"4,Xt 414,F41-!!4:4t'::14'41?-;4 / 441 _ r15 iso. 1400 '-.V:3''''''4'.•.44'4,:i;i'V,IF,:t ''.;:;.-15T,TYiYiN ''.'.'F'4.,'''5f1:i'444f6V,:Vili,.., ,, S F--6---, � a $ x' } "x'1", t Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 2927 Casco Point Rd This data (i) s furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished withnowarranty of any khd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGlS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gisinfo©hennepin.us Date Application Received: 10/23/19 Date Application Considered as Complete:10/23/19 1'O` VO 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 02/20/20 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members a ` Dustin Rief, City Administrator 1 4kEsHOV8' From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 18 November 2019 Subject: #LA19-000096, Denali Custom Homes o/b/o Drew Hueler, 1398 Rest Point Road Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area, structural coverage, hardcover, and rear yard setback variances in order to redevelop the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommendation is detailed on page 5. Background The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on a property with substandard area and width.Additionally requested are a structural coverage variance to allow 22%structure where 20% is the limit, hardcover variance to permit 30.1% hardcover where 25% is permitted,and a rear setback variance for a 26.4 foot setback from the road where a 30-foot setback is required. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330-Setbacks: LR-1B Required Proposed Rear/Street 30' 26.4' East Side* 7.5' 8' West Side* 7.5' 8' Lakeshore 75' 75' Average Lakeshore The average lakeshore setback will be met. * 78-330(b)(1)Side yard setback. For lots that are non-conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building... shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. Section 78-330 - Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 10,701 s.f. (0.24 acre) 69' @ 75'/69' @ OHWL FILE#LA19-000096 18 Nov 2019 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 10,701 s.f. (0.24 acre) Allowed: 2,140 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,362 s.f. (22%) Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Overlay District Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 2,675 s.f. 3,225 s.f. Tier 1 10,701 s.f. (25%) (31.1%) 0 w/in 75' Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Section 78-330) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for structural, hardcover, and setback variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are required in order to redevelop the property.The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Rear Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-330) The property is relatively shallow;the 75-foot setback is more restrictive than the average lakeshore setback which is common on similarly shallow properties on the lake. There is an approximate 45-foot deep buildable area on the property.The applicant is requesting a 3.6' variance on the rear(street) to accommodate the 21'x 31'three car garage and so that the home and property lines can be squared off. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) The applicant is proposing 30.1%total site hardcover(3,225 square feet) where 25% is permitted; 600 feet greater than the limit. Structural Coverage Variance (Section 78-1403) The applicant is proposing 2,362 square feet, or 22%, of building coverage. As proposed,the property exceeds the permitted structural limit by 2%or 222 square feet. If the proposed building footprint were to be reduced to be more in keeping with the character of the FILE#LA19-000096 18 Nov 2019 Page 3 of 5 neighborhood e.g. 20% (2,140 square foot footprint),the resulting proposed overall hardcover variance requested would be lessened to 28%. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Due to the scope,some of the proposed variances are not in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. However,the small,shallow lot does include difficulties in its small size and depth, and proximity to the lake to permit redevelopment. The average lakeshore setback is proposed to be met protecting views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. A number of the type of variances proposed to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan, such as lot area, rear setback, and some level of hardcover variance. However the hardcover and structural coverage levels proposed are be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the required rear yard setback, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties. However, the requested structural level and subsequently the hardcover level,appears to be unreasonable and are not supported by practical difficulties. b. here are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The uniquely small lot size, location with respect to the lake and roadway, and required setbacks prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. There should be consideration for variance approvals from the hardcover limitation, street/rear setback and the lot width and area requirements. Nevertheless, the proposed hardcover and structural levels are above and beyond that which would be supported by practical difficulty; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home which is reasonable, FILE#LA19-000096 18 Nov 2019 Page 4 of 5 however as designed the home and improvements may not fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted calculations and information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property's substandard size and depth with respect to the lakeshore and adjacent properties creates difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property's substandard size and applied setbacks create difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area, rear yard variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant.The variances for the hardcover and structural coverage levels proposed are a request beyond preservation of a basic property right. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.Granting some level of hardcover variance, the lot width and area,and rear yard setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. However the proposed level of structure is not supported by practical difficulty and is contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for lot area,lot width,rear setback including some more appropriately scaled level of hardcover variances are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant.The additional variance for structure as proposed would be strictly for the convenience of the property owner and unsupported by practical difficulties The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. FILE#LA19-000096 18 Nov 2019 Page 5 of 5 Practical Difficulties Analysis The City adopted ordinances over the past few years to address inadequacies in the small, and/or narrow existing properties, and disproportionate distribution of lot area within the 75- foot setback for hardcover on Tier 1 lots. In this neighborhood, Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the size and shape of the lot, and shallow depth of the lot between Rest Point Road and lake affecting the property which justify the variances allowing development and redevelopment. However,the applicant is proposing redevelopment on this property at a scale which is unsupported by practical difficulties, and is beyond what is reasonable for the property and neighborhood to support. In particular,the proposed plan for 22%structural coverage exceeds the reasonable flexibility allowed by variance from a staff perspective. In fact, staff finds the proposed structure level and corresponding proposed hardcover level do not reflect sensitivity to the neighborhood character or community goals established by ordinance. Engineer Comments The City Engineer will provide a comprehensive review at the time of the building permit request. Public Comments Public comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit I. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width, lot area, rear setback, and some level of hardcover variance should the plan be reduced so that the structural level is conforming at 20%. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map Exhibit H. Aerial Photo Exhibit I. Neighbor Comments Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 10/23/2019 Address: 1398 REST POINT RD MOUND, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723330004 Land Use Number: LA19-000096 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: Gregory Andrew Hueler Address: 1398 Rest Point Rd Mound, MN 55364 Applicant: Name: Jake Wille Company: Denali Custom Homes Address: 18352 Minnetonka Boulevard Wayzata, MN 55391 jake@denalicustomhomes.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Variances for New Home Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application .. Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000096 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:The owner wishes to construct a modest home with a standard depth garage attached. 2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The lot is of substandard size and the 75 ft lake set back and 30 ft front yard setback create a narrow depth building area. The Front yard set back requires a driveway that increases hardcover over the allowable percentage. 3.The variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response:The proposed home and garage are consistent with the neighborhood.The removal of the existing garage that lies 1 ft off the street and encroaches 29 ft into the set back has a positive impact on the character of the neighborhood. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: No economic considerations. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116].06,Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response:The front yard set back of 30 feet and rear lake setback of 75 feet create a narrow depth building area and the substandard lot size presents a difficulty in designing a modest floor plan and garage to meet hardcover requirements. 6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Conditions ar peculiar to the property and adjoining properties. 9.The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Conditions do not apply to other land in the district. 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response:The variance is needed to construct a modest single family home with attached garage. 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: It will not. 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: It is not a convenience, it is necessary. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DREW HUELER OF LOT 3, SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 REST POINT PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA p�4 O�J� 1 G�°'1F elf,' S OSP . 'e ... 0, .,.... . ds s.. „. � fwo•i0 4, i4r i - ry �)� ,. cs ` ROPOSED ORWt,4,0i, Om,r.o�� •ROPOSED it i� '\ \ ® HOUSE 4 SILT FENCE— ±^lete%,'NG - gtOU �X% SETBACK \ 390 V .' \�• ,w3p(o) LINES e\ \f ra, C /TOP OF FOUNDATION ��;' o 'EFERENCE.POINT (SJJ�) ¢�� `'' J-� PROPOSED \ \ RASED t9JJ�I \ a\ HOUSE @a.\ vJ..) #1398 oa` ds \% ' �i��. ts.v,1 �U �F ) dd) Op vAMMErzY 0.91 \\y EXISTING " 4`` �" 75- • \ tif' SETBACK / \ HGUSE ,..��. LINE ,\ ce/ \ Er #1400 . KA AVERAGE(svJ) \ ' .�. 0 \LAKESHORE // / \ > SETBACK LINE / \ X, \ j2' / i/ \\ \\\Z \\' PROPOSED / \ \ 5 SILT FENCE 80 � \ EXISTING \\ \' 033.3 swye t�% j / t1°0° l \: uwE i " \ x , .\v.V.\111111:k\ . ; , \ \ 7 '-.-.. 0'•7''•=ilii• R \ \ - ///0. �1 9 '929.4 CONTOUR \ \\ (932,, ,,5ryK LINE(OHM.) \ \\ /\/ ,••> • \\ y✓ LAKE 1 MINNETONKA WEST ARM LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 3, SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14, REST POINT PARK • : denotes iron marker found (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum 1910.8): denotes proposed spot elevation 917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : (verify) —(930)—: denotes proposed contour line 1) Garage = 934.51 Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 2) Top of foundation = 1937.51 This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location 3) Main f,ocr = 1938.61 of an existing house cnd garage, to be removed, spot elevations and topography, and the proposed location of a proposed house, driveway and grades thereon. It does not purport 4) Crawl space = 1933.51 to show any other improvements or encroachments. DOE GRADES nesmeTaN GRONBERG AND hereby nertify that this plan.spealtication,ar,ePar, =CALF w s prepared boy me,or under my direct supervision, 1"=2G, 10-1S-19 PROPOSED NOUSE.HARDCOVER AND„-,. NEIREDUCE PAO,GHBORS A/C UNIT LXE WALK OCATED ASSOCIATES, INC. and that am duly Licensed Land Surveyor under — the laws of the State of Minnesota. pAr, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND 5-28-19 SURVEYORS,&SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE �� Joe No. LONG LAKE,MN.55356 — 19-161A 952-473-4141 Mark 5.Gronberg Cinnesota License N ber 12755 19-161A City of Orono */%14 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: l3 9 X Cr* P��tir Ao, Q (Huc[ER) KEfHo' Prepared by: Date: GAo,vel FR G 14 ATrQ c rrd TFC, li.1 . -/S /9- 10-/8'-t9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) (Tier-0 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:t2OPOSED HARDCOVER) In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier'I properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Feet Survey (Square ) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A ,iOL(7c B fTaC� - 22$f SF 8 / S.F. G Luo LK (06RM6-A/IL6 Alt/CA. 22 IF— LIP ' Baa sic whir a S.F. DR I i./E E ,p CC K �r7lJ 1/7i o PEtGcc,1 7// S.F. F /.S z S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. K L _ S.F. S.F.- M N S.F. S.F. ' 0 P S.F. S.F. Q S.F. R S S.F. S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W SS..F. F. X S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 3225 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F._ S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover n S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 322 S S.F. (4) Total Lot Area log 70/ S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 3d./y% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 RUN DATE:10/24/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 07-117-23 32 0002 38 07-117-23 33 0001 J HOUTMAN/K J HOUTMAN TRUSTS LAKE MINNETONKA PROP LLC 1340 REST POINT LA 1410 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JAMES HESSEL HOUTMAN LAKE MINNETONKA PROP LLC KRISTINE JOANN HOUTMAN C/O 2575 HAMLINE AVE N#B 1340 REST POINT LA ROSEVILLE MN 55113 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0034 38 07-117-23 33 0002 CHRISTINA C NILLISSEN M J NELSON&D L WILLIAMS 1365 REST POINT RD 1400 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CHRISTINA C NILLISSEN DAVID LLOYD WILLIAMS PO BOX 814 5141 PORTLAND AVE S WAYZATA MN 55391 0814 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55417 38 07-117-23 32 0037 38 07-117-23 33 0003 GERLICHER LIVING TRUST COLLINS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 1375 REST POINT RD 1406 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 MICHAEL&LYNNE GERLICHER COLLINS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 398 NASSAU WAY 5761 SUNNYBROOK LA BOULDER CITY NV 89005 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0038 38 07-117-23 33 0004 JAMES H HOUTMAN TRUST ETAL GREGORY ANDREW HUELER 1373 REST POINT RD 1398 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JAMES HOUTMAN TRUSTEE GREGORY ANDREW HUELER KRISTINE HOUTMAN TRUSTEE 1398 REST POINT RD 1373 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0039 38 07-117-23 33 0005 DAVID MILLER/JENNIFER MILLER P&N WALSH 1350 REST POINT LA 1390 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 DAVID MILLER/JENNIFER MILLER PATRICK J WALSH 1350 REST POINT LA 1390 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0054 38 07-117-23 33 0006 G T AHERN&C F AHERN J T NYGARD&K M NYGARD 1345 REST POINT LA 1386 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 GEORGE T AHERN J T NYGARD&K M NYGARD CANDACE F AHERN 1386 REST POINT RD 1345 REST POINT LA MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0056 38 07-117-23 33 0007 S W HATCHER&C A HATCHER JAY NYGARD&KENDALL NYGARD 4685 NORTH SHORE DR 1380 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 STEVEN E&CHERYL HATCHER JAY NYGARD&KENDALL NYGARD 4685 NORTH SHORE DR 1380 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0060 38 07-117-23 33 0011 J K LANGHANS&S LANGHANS D W&J L RAHN 1366 REST POINT RD 1385 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JAMES K&SHEILA LANGHANS DAVID W&JODI L RAHN 1366 REST POINT RD 1385 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0061 38 07-117-23 33 0012 AMY J MIGLINI G D GANGSTEE&K GANGSTEE 1371 REST POINT LA 1374 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 AMY J MIGLINI GARY&KATHRYN GANGSTEE 1371 REST POINT LA 1374 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0062 38 07-117-23 33 0013 D S WALSH&A L HELEN C CAVENDER&B CAVENDER 1354 REST POINT CIR 1405 REST POINT RD ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 DENNIS WALSH/AMANDA HELEN C CAVENDER&B CAVENDER 1354 REST POINT CIR 1235 YALE PLACE #602 MOUND MN 55364 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 10/24/2019 x :,,,.:4,...,,,::,:.,;,:,.:_x_.1.: .:45i .t.:;:,...„A,•;,co.:_r::.,4,,:ir,,...,:, ,;,;::.;;.:,:„.z.:,:::;44 . 'it'.-' .a ..... 7 `,, " mak. .1.4,1011. tyr , •,, ,t8 0 M..,Iii„'.';.'?..-',,ri,-..:;'"';,!:,.--:!-i'fi!'iiiiit''iiii.-i,tik•Yi4,00=1,0:•,,W31-4,,,,,,41 4 MY <<��' Y 'r12�y � S� 4 ii,4_,,,,,i,.,,i,,,, ..,..:+i.:„.,:„,.. „__1;._.,_;;t1miiito.•:;,„oz„ :,1:1 „;., ., f ,.;,..3,.;,,,,-.,:e.-..,-...,;..4;;,,,i,„:14-..„:,-;:::„.,-;4131,15,11.41;;31inir,Eil:ii .......elsopt-5„.___ ..,...„,„.......,..4.,,„, ,,„;,,, „:;,:4;;Lm;:. T...;,.;..s....?;;,,,.1,:;lil.c.iit:6;....,„4.1.1...;i:„:. i„.4;tvw/ ....,..r.„.:,..,::,.....__.ar.._,,„.Ntv.„4„_..;.„;,i.. ..ft-„,„ ,0,;;•i,._,:o.. '1,-.1:4.1:-..'.. -41-fKWLV5P7'=---41--.21q:. .---.'--- ,1; :'.-;..',!'.ic-:'.: c.-,:',.:•;Ze$,K.'AiS--.::-iA:Aftki;,,,,ca, '::',---=--! ' , , VJ "i ' i ' " _ s .-F '' r . y, '''f-A':.:.r..--.:---cii.l.'''',:'..,'.'-.-..V.,-3,61 ;icr-5,-I1,,;'4 ,fer...-i-?..4-f5;i,htrte4 ,.:4 -...:!..;,.,:.,.::,--i, -..,....!1:'W,:c-t,t,f'Z-1.-;.-,'LaVg-g.,,,'41-!..r4"..k- + _, j, ` ," .- 1 . y f. mo - j #k t 1,,-k„?.t„,--1,..1,-.:,,-,,V,-xI,:-,-V,-it'-;::14;).4M* -----;-1'::-e7.;t'.1;-.:;,,,.,f:,,,,4,y5--1-..:fVk„.4,4-t4Iiit#4,.7*41O-11h1?1k4-1,t!;.,.1/4,,41 ti ` /h 1W.ii.4it-,V4,4,f:;, .-.'.- d. 9 .red :a k,4 Y Ott'x d)Si -7 '/i'x }t�i r _- tli t - � te - �'x' < i ft ° " t ' %, 'R s c" 's `" sv + 4 L =• - 3 te ( Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I i i i I t i i t 1398 Rest Point Road This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any kited; and (ii) is notsiitable for legal,engineering or surseying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us r-`` " V 111 t , , , i y €"� yEq vF rte` CK' LII a „.,- .,,\ , ,.-- ,„ n , , ,,..,;:. .„, .....,..,..,_ ,, . ys "+"r -,t_1, te' - . YF U 'Yssr `^dad, 4 .�• ..,�"' '' .. Q� • � ,,• LWT ;1 : -'t • .i , , ,...,,,-. .,,-,i' .-.:: i .., \IV.A.,‘ . --s"" 1- , , ft, - t , . ' d t .. ,..,t , ..". - . , , _ 8 ._ . 1 . 1 ' , '4 , a II} - \ „x .,i°` i+ , i ,, , i4 z fix' ax r x - 4,� v ,�x +SIF i .gid t ', »�".�"`,tt ,. '. ria tds �:•` ,; t r q' x Fir' ° y ss# ''''' ' t tt 1;1! ' '' .0"4411 * 4, , !--, - -,, ° af' l f * x t 41, Vt 3 f Y r T-•yk #j r .• a p ,, *14'4% � 4 � ' a Ii '° +v i k 04 j"h tc ,/04' i 4. • } N Y` •t � <„a4 � � ASA; ,,.. ,,„.. 1 , , It. .-„, Ilk.%,. - it 4 *4, 4 Art ^:. 1, ,-...” 1,;‘t..,.. w }'... ,ems From: Collins,Tara GRE-MG To: Melanie Curtis Cc: bcollinsCaldvamx.com Subject: Support for Drew Hueler Home Build-1398 Rest Point Road Date: Monday,October 28,2019 8:30:32 AM Good morning, Melanie. My name is Tara Collins and my husband Brent and I would like to email our support of Drew's home build plan at 1398 Rest Point Road. We know Drew will do an amazing job with the build and that he has support from other neighbors as well. Please let us know if there is anything additional you would need from us—but again, Drew has our full support. Sincerely, Tara and Brent Collins 1406 Rest Point Road NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. From: Bruce Fohr To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Janet Bredeson Fohr Subject: 1398 Rest Point Road Variance Request Input Date: Thursday,October 24,2019 3:26:39 PM Dear Melanie, My wife,Janet Bredeson Fohr,and I own the home at the end of Rest Point Road,Mound,MN--1410. We are aware that our neighbor,Drew Hueler,who owns the property on 1398 Rest Point Road,has submitted plans for his home remodel and construction project on the property. We understand that his plan contains a variance request on hard cover and set-backs in order for him to build his new home as per his design plan. We have known Drew for nearly six years and we know his commitment to the neighborhood,Lake Minnetonka,and quality workmanship in his home and property. He previously owned the home immediately next to ours(1406). His remodeling and upgrading of that property has been remarkable and highly appreciated by the entire neighborhood. We strongly endorse his plan for 1398,including his variance requests. We have no complaint regarding his plans--which he has shown and explained to us. We hope that the City agrees and grants his variance request. Sincerely, Bruce&Janet Bredeson Fohr 1410 Rest Point Road,Mound,MN 55364 Bruce Fohr President FMR Associates,Inc. 6045 E.Grant Road Tucson,AZ 85712 520-886-5548(office) 520-886-9307(Fax) www.FMRassociates.com From: Patrick To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Drew Hueler Subject: Drew Hueler-New construction at 1406 Rest Point Road Date: Tuesday,October 22,2019 4:35:51 PM Hi Melanie, Please be advised that I have seen Drew's plan for his new home. Based on everything that Drew has shown me, I believe that the house will fit well into our neighborhood. I have just one stipulation. The grade of the house should be consistent with our home. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Patrick Walsh 952-476-8732 ra, Virus-free. www.avast.com From: DAVID L WILLIAMS To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Drew Hueler Application Date: Thursday,November 14,2019 4:06:00 PM Melanie, After receiving the notice from the City of Orono concerning the planning commission meeting scheduled for next Monday 11/18, I contacted your office with concerns about the new construction, and a possible new fence going up as part of that project, and its effect on the placement of the air conditioner on our property. We have had a summer residence at our location since 1938, replaced with a year-round home constructed in 1973. Since its construction, our outdoor appliances have always been in their current location. I understand the city does not get involved in property line disputes, but the current plans as they now stand will affect our property. I have talked with Drew, and hope this situation can be reasonable resolved, but would ask that this concern be made part of the record. Sincerely, David L. Williams Sent from Mail for Windows 10 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members *Of\j"\44 Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director5 ktsHo� Date: November 18,2019 Subject: #19-84, Julie Thometz o/b/o 1350 Baldur LLC, Baldur Park Road, Sketch Plan Application Summary: This is a sketch plan for a proposed plat that would combine 7 lots into two buildable lots and additional Right of Way. Staff Recommendation: Staff seeks comment on the proposed plat. Background The subject parcel was part of a sketch plan (Case No. LA18-68) in 2018. At that time, one easement back lot was proposed to be platted. The applicant has adjusted their plans, adding an extension of right of way and a second platted lot, for the possible construction of two additional lots on the point at Baldur Park. The Planning Commission(August 20,2018)and City Council(October 8,2018)reviewed that application. The minutes from these meetings are attached as Exhibits H and I, respectively and are offered for additional background. Commissioners generally struggled with the creation of lots that required variances to improve. Council members generally supported flexibility to the road standards,and noted that inherent difficulties may support flexibility with respect to lot standards. The proposal A single property owner owns the 14 platted parcels at the end of Baldur Park. These parcels include the subject parcels, the existing home at the end of the point, and an accessory building/garage. The plan shows the combination of the southern 7 lots to be platted into 2 lots to be built on. Additional right of way for an extension of Baldur Park Road is proposed, including a cul de sac. No building or grading plans have been provided. The remaining lots at the point are not included in the proposal. Sketch Plan Review Parameters The goal of this review is to provide the applicant with an overview of the pertinent City ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal. The"Summary of Issues for Consideration"reveals a number of issues with the proposed plat and should provide direction to the applicants regarding the proposal. Planning Commission should review each topic and identify any issues to which the applicant should pay special attention. FILE#LA19-000084 November 18,2019 Page 2 of 4 As a sketch plan review, any comments or suggestions to the applicants are non-binding but will be extremely helpful as the project moves forward. Analysis The main change from the proposal last fall is the introduction of an extension to Baldur Park Road and a cul de sac. Baldur Park Road is currently a public road, and the applicant has indicated that the proposed extension will be also. There is no room to construct a cul de sac at the current northern end of the existing Baldur Park Road. The property is currently zoned LR-1C and guided for Urban Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. The application does not propose a change to either document, and pending further refined plans, is anticipated to conform. Lot Area. The subdivision code defines lot area as: In urban areas served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in chapter 78 or half-acre, whichever is less (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water wetlands or areas at or below the floodplain elevation for a specific property), and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or floodplain area. Each lot created must be 0.5 acres and 100 feet of width. Since these are lake lots, the width is measured at the lake and 75 feet back. The lots appear to meet the width requirement, but not the lot area. Additionally, the lots will require variances from the lakeyard prior to construction. The revised proposal, attached as Exhibit B provides solutions to the floodplain issues identified below. However, these solutions decrease the lot area, resulting in lots less that Code standards. A variance will be necessary. Required area Gross area Defined area Lot 1 21,780 16,954 7,814 Lot 2 21,780 14,526 7,590 Based on the lot area issues, it appears that the subject 2 lots could be combined into one buildable lot, and a second(or third)buildable lot be created further toward the point. The provision of a cul de sac supports this future development. Floodplain. The plans reflect a cut and fill proposal to create building pads out of the floodplain by creating additional floodplain. This process will need to formally be approved via a Conditional Use Permit. The MCWD has provided comments based on the current plan. Additionally, MCWD comments based on preliminary review of the 2018 plan remain relevant, both are attached as Exhibit E. It appears the solution is approvable. FILE#LA19-000084 November 18,2019 Page 3 of 4 Road/ Cul de sac length. Baldur Park Road is currently approximately 990 feet from its' intersection with Birch Lane. The maximum length permitted by code is 1000 feet. Baldur Park Road currently ends without a turn-around or cul de sac. The proposed extension of Baldur Park will lengthen the road about 400 feet to approximately 1390 feet. Staff supports this deviation from the length as a cul de sac benefits the public and there are no other options to reduce the length of the cul de sac. Currently, Baldur Park Road is a 18' wide road within a 30 foot wide right of way. The proposal shows a 18 feet wide paved surface within a 20' right of way. Both are deviations from the code requirements of 24' wide pavement within a 50' right of way. Staff can support a deviation, but to the existing standards of Baldur Park. The Council seemed to confirm this deviation last fall. It appears that the road is proposed above the base flood elevation of 931.5, though further detail will be necessary. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements & Fees. Stormwater plans have not been developed at this stage. Stormwater will need to be managed as required by the Watershed District. The project will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee (SW&DT Fee). Final calculation of the fee would be based on the final lot count. If, for example the development results in 2 lots at 0.5 acres, the SW&DT Fee would be $6,050 per new lot as outlined in the 2019 Orono Fee Schedule. Utility Locations/Availability/Assessments/Connection Fees. The lots will need to connect to sanitary sewer, the sanitary sewer line will need to be extended at the applicant's expense. A SAC connection fee will be required at the time of connection. Extension of the sewer will be the responsibility of the developer. Municipal Water does not serve the property. A well will need to be developed for each lot. It is assumed that all other utilities will be underground and located within easements and right of way. This will be verified with the review of the utility plan and supports the need for additional right of way. Wetlands. It appears that a portion of the western shore is impacted by wetlands. The MCWD will likely require a buffer of some width, which may impact access and building sites. Wetland buffers may be included in lot area calculations, but not the wetlands themselves. The proposal does include an averaged wetland buffer,to be approved by the watershed district. Tree and/or Woodland Impacts. The site plan indicates several large cottonwood trees on the property, many of which will be removed to accommodate construction. Conservation Design. This project will trigger the need for a conservation design, due to FILE#LA19-000084 November 18,2019 Page 4 of 4 the proposed density. Staff supports a waiver of this requirement because of the size and scope of the development. Summary of Issues for Consideration Staff suggests that the primary focus for consideration and discussion by the Planning Commission should include the following topics: 1. Does the Planning Commission support the lot layout as presented? 2. Does the Commission generally support a variance from the lot area requirements? 3. Does the Commission generally support a variance from the 75' lake yard setback? 4. Does the Commission support a waiver from the cul de sac length standard? 5. Does the Commission support a waiver for the new Baldur Park Road to be consistent with the existing Baldur Park Road? 6. Does the Commission support a waiver from the conservation design requirement? 7. Has the Commission identified issues in addition to those identified by staff? Staff Recommendation Staff seeks direction on the Issues stated above Public Comments As part of the project last year,public comments were received and attached as Exhibit G. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Applicants' Submitted Sketch Plan Exhibit C. Location Map Exhibit D. Staff Comment Letter Exhibit E. MCWD Comment Letter* Exhibit F. MCWD Wetland NOD Exhibit G. Public Comments* Exhibit H. PC minutes dated August 20,2018 Exhibit I. CC Minutes dated October 8, 2018 Exhibit J. Engineering Comments dated November 13,2019 *Exhibits E,F,and G were offered as part of the sketch plan in 2018 and are provided here as they remain relevant to the current application. Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 09/18/2019 Address: 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED , MN 00000 Parcel Number: 0811723310010 Land Use Number: LA 19-000084 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: 1350 BALDUR LLC Address: 4400 WEST ARM RD E SPRING PARK, MN 55384 Applicant: Name: Julie Thometz Company: Address: 1340 Baldur Park Rd WAYZATA, MN 55391 jthometz@comcast.net Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Sketch plan Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: G1' 1 /\gJN SEi f4f1LE /7 \d,s esu SKETCH PLAN FOR \ 1360 & 1370 BALDUR LLC \.�9� OF LOTS 21-27, BLOCK 1, BALDUR PARK / 936 � HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ` �J .\ 1 934 '\ \\` - - a \ _,. yv� i /93,.5 : \� 9�2_��\ \ LOT 1 "'40' N=4, \ \ ' ` \ +UTLOT A _..._ / J I 3653_SO.FT. LAKE .954'SO.FT. SCJ � / ] TOTVK NFA- ir , 932 ''.Vy\\ a MINNETONKA A' '°�' Q ...."-,0_,„,,,,.. POSSIBLE HOUSE \\ d \ • 929.4„..., �:..( - tiAlgazniumpr. .9"'",� �;`�, 9 \` NORTH ARM '.uWegx Daa¢mxc 41N N 0111140 SQ .... .•••' 414110‘410,1111 3 LOODPLAIN FILL lb z , �I ..\J�/ y ��9Zer \\ ` \ \ \.. s or LAKE °�\ �, 1?03SIBLE HOUSE\ '�932- MINNETONKA \\ °�, T 937_ X44. '- ��� '�'� I I \ /� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES • Cl NORTH ARM �;m�`�� ) / % Lots 22-27, and part of Lot 21, Block 1, BALDUR PARK . \ X910.81: denotes existing spot elevation • • :..\\ 5.-i T 1 / ---917--: denotes existing contour line \\ I \\ ' ® ,_[? --{s3ol denotes proposed contour line \\ / I,,.Q NOTE: existing contours, shoreline, driveway cabin and II IM ./ / floodplain (931.5 contour) are show per survey by others. • II IW ,/ / Any fill in floodplain to be mitigated by creating Al '� / floodplain on a 1:1 basis. ,uvrsv�sv • °'4c / 11'•"A / DATE DESCRIPrx1N 10-7-10 REVISED attions 10-115-19 CALETe'LSTS GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC 'whbypcetm,ths anr mcEfiirco ,uorrvrie onr,t "=30 'sEISED z Lor SKETCH thewsL fthasaaLsurveyor Dnder11-0-te WETLAND � oT°GRADESs<r DQE oe t ofMnneota DATECONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS 10-1-18 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 fe A� ,y �fLs�f ��j �. 952-473-4141 18-328 Mark S.Groriberg -Minnesota License Number 12755 18-328 t .„....„‘ %_,,\,...i\ \).,1,:\.;,....,,,,.s..,.:, Al N9 ....T. 1\iivii\I\1\\.\\‘\4 3 \ \ ... \ '9Js:-.- 4t , ,I A ..-.,. \ ......J.;: A\ A \ .... ...., .. ,...••••• 7 • .../. ... s 4 \s::, -: ',5: .?, \ , \ . •--,..4,,,alt. v..9,54,,, 1 1 ...... ...---. ,p,' ........51.::, \'TO.,,, •fr; \ I.....••k'"- ':, NI . .t• \\•-"•• ' \ ititft,'4140 ..'••••• k '' ''C . ..........---1 \ ...‘ . t 1,, „.. . . . , , '9,2 41. — \ •-•"/.... i '' 7' -—y e.,, , .. •. ., 4,,,,, ... .............. . , 4 AikA,.. FiLi.. Aiiek.... n .. ..... •10,,- j \ 1 \\II, 41 I ..... ., Ira ,- 4 ' \ 1,1 it..1-,A . .. •. . .. . ... ....1; i ., 1 . .,....,,.:,..... tir"f .,A .•. ....... K.,,N.,,,,. ... P ----1.-- .............- -'...11k- l, II .... V. \ 'P: ossss,/, ..,...„ Itt .."- ' 'IU I .11 e D. i .., c.... . .., •. . %"..4,...'• AMP . . . . . .. --- - ..,,,...*, II v'\it \ '...,.:::., ....t......... --- .04„\-....vow .......i 1 • . .. . w - -.s.... % ....... 932 . •••• .. \“ ta,t-4;fir . .. . . . 1.1.trigialli0 W.I:li •Z . . ,.--•.....''"* nownsi .,. ;-.1,i'l 44,z, .... ...:::: ' ............. -(7,- \..\ .:.:::, ..„........... _ - ,flatrillir 1 km• .0 ›'...' r1 47----''Iiri;-----:'. ,,,A:. \ ej141 15 1 P v). C.t..1-----:.,..,/,/ , ç7., \1 • •:::... \ I\u"711 - 111 "a I, ...... ... ....,„ ... v ,, 4;. lainii.....i 9.32.5La:••'.... c,, \••' S ••••1111115111-111 ru.i-4\I\ 5.. ......ic-- II\ ••! idmirl.1111112111 I • I ..... II' . -- ..., LA I • 1 \I t i il ,• 111.r 04;,.. ...............p ••iii - , ),,Sk,.. . r•,) .4;...., ,1 ..... • .. .ir 8 b.:k,:6, .1 j lb.;,;• ,,r.A •:.. r/t< A A. A —•----— ' g? CI \ - 'ill E. • .• 17 io 10,61•11.- AP.... 9j • 111L4'' : k, s"...,•—•-.„,,. IF' i ......)......... . v \ ,14,W ...... .......... •N\ , . , . . 11..........iv ...............1 ,,,,,;_,,:_t ....,e-952- / c... c . II ;' \ • r:, - z • II i : I- 7 . . /--- / • t , '• -.. l, / I . n ,v /A - 4 <$tiv , _A-- : • /I ' 7 lei\I L/ ..•••--...17,z • ,—ll • I 4 I , i 110,/ //6'4;s- - , .".0 ...- -.-.,i t ,/ "s6, ;;• .1 A. / r '-';'::' ... ..4 // . i N.... .,....-. ,...„' N, -1...... `,-- / l/ "'I /2 a. „......... Al....) e..NY "AVII, A... .1,,, . .' • .•' VG MOTI1M"ti£1,1- "..c. ././ -INTI',Saft.-",f)c,W,i,911311NOW) ../. . ,.. ...•":7 _.. ..--" - .. ...-"s ,..."/ ../- . • ./.. ,.......,?' ...„.•••••• ./ .... A...........\....) ,..--' .., ... .....,.. -- ..----..... . ./....... ... ,A ,'.. .A. s L—V ..-.......... ••• • A ...- , C74,1 .......%:• A44. ..•••-• .., .. •••-• \ b•, A:' .•••'''..... Cr,., • .............. .. .... ...,..*-...1 N'.;. ...•••:;...'" le ...../ i ....... ......... ...- •. . I ........... ' ' l'...,..:, ',... .**..,4.4".., ,,,.......... , \ .... .. . ., . •-%' ':,; ' I ---"-.. ..--- ..-•• ... ei---- .- 1 . , ... $ ..--,. ..?,:.- . • , I .........--......- ..„. - ,....---. . ........... .,.e' . ,14c \ / ..-........ , ... . . .... ......................... • ,..,-... ts, . .. ...... . . ...„ , -,,, •••• riki,-........ - ,... • . , .. ..... ., . ',. -'8'A ) : ., , • , . .. . . , ...... "•-......,,A 1/4....) 4 ' 44 .,..-•• ' • . • .. .--,-----r. 1 . :'''•.-. - ,,.. i* ‘t,., • t 011 / — -......\ .: ...4 A. ....%. 0 \' •. . , , , \ ......,, ,,,! ... „61.,....c.q.4-0='.....7.177•‘;_krilroi .. , ... ,,,,. \ 1.,,.. : , - -& - P / , c#, F.. \ ..,e, ... .,. ---,3---.. ii-- . 4......, C9 / \ ta ,-7".1•11% ''' -' - ' ' Iii ,.... .. .... ,.... : / ,,, / r- /- \ 'c° * allinnetalit tr, ./. ..s 4., : 1 _-----.. / ....._ 4 / , 1 ( / \--‘ Ga : cv : ... i / s. .... •,,,, a NNW.,, S .N., 1 . ....- : / ............... .... 14:„..Aot • 1 1., ...p, , 1 (_st,,- .... g isi ......._annu, ....,,... w. , .... .,,,.......___-.. kiti,, ----\ - 4...,,,,," i 1 , : •!MIC.1111191M111 - ,, ........ -4£• M •••."—— _._ -- ‘. -- P \/ ••„. v \...... :. 4,, . ' —— ileVO...so ?IV• \ • a i 1 -VEL'Ij . 36:(-16:614 r---7 '\ -- - 2° -------:--_--'----3 ' --- ,Lw- t / CEO --- • - -. 16....•;-,..,,,..,•; _--- - ---....00,-...=...... ___,,...___..--,,-- .,._. .._____..-,:...,-......,-...immiu z____... ... _ __,--zcs-—. - z,1/4-8.--•-,--- k. NI c-*N.,, -1— ••• ' ii 41111•"---„..-....-.7-..,_--.—• .—=-•:-.:..... - ...........• ---‘..-....,-,...„..., . .. -- --•••••••_. • -.--,,•6z6---- - '•-' 10X _•:.•-.---- ',...„ c•o•eo , ... ,,,....:,-- ...... -4...--.. ..____ .------ ... \ secte.-- / ..... ............... O." ,i•• • rG,C.V \2 ' K............. Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/15/2018 F y, ' * '§ 4F 4 Itf J t.'•:- yk , i. ;.. :r : . xX ° fyj ;fi .M1 mpl� % 1 inch =200 feet No results Comments: LA18-000068 This data(i)is furnished'AS ith representation as to completeness orno accuracy; is urnisno warranty of(ii)anyfkind: hed wand(iii)ith is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resu lting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2018 ‘L,OfVQ CITY OF ORONO Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600 ` 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 � Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us .kEsHO� September 30,2019 Julie Thometz 1340 Baldur Park Road VIA EMAIL Wayzata, MN 55391 jthometz(&comcast.net Re: Subdivision on Baldur Park File#LA19-000084 The City has received your proposal to subdivide your property at Baldur Park Rd. The submittal indicates a proposal to combine multiple lots into three buildable lots, with a subdivision to create right of way(ROW) for an extension of Baldur Park Road, resulting in a plat. This process is governed by the City's subdivision process. Based on the plan provided,the city offers the following comments: The sketch plan process is an initial presentation of a subdividers plan and serves as a basis for conceptual discussion between the city and the subdivider. You have been advised that your confidence in the Planning Commission and Council's response is proportionate to the level of detail offered in the submittal. The platting of several lots at the northern end of Baldur Park,with an extension of Baldur Park Road does not pose a significant policy question. The issues for discussion are primarily based on the details of the plan: Lot width and size, ROW width and size, storm water management, floodplain impacts and solutions, etc. It is strongly recommended that you retain the services of a surveyor or civil engineer to prepare responses to the items below, prior to presentation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Multiple reviews of a sketch plan by the Planning Commission and City Council are not available. At minimum, please provide a paper copy of the plan, I have received a photograph of the plan. Lot Area/Width. As submitted, the plan is not to scale, so it is impossible to confidently determine that the lots meet the requirements for size and width. That said,the minimum standards for lots in this LR-1C zone are: Lot Area: .5 acres (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water, wetlands or areas at or below the floodplain elevation for a specific property), and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or floodplain area. Confirmation of the lot area is requested. Lot Width: Width of the lot is measured at the OHWL and at the 75' setback, and must be 100 feet. The lots appear to meet the standard, but should be confirmed. Street design. The plan shows a cul-de-sac and a road, as advised. It is assumed that the road and cul de sac is public. A waiver will be required to be approved by the City Council to reduce the width of the road ROW and paved surface. Staff can support the reduction of the pavement width to correspond to the existing Baldur Park Road. Staff will not support parking on this new section of Baldur Park. Stormwater management may require barrier curbing in places. Flood Elevation/ Wetlands. Both proposed home pads show an encroachment into the flood elevation. To meet floodplain regulations,the lowest point of any structure will need to be at least 932.5. Elevating the houses on fill will require a Conditional Use Permit. Engineering will need to be completed and reviewed to confirm that the fill will not impact the flood level of the lake. A wetland delineation has been receieve3d and accepted by the Watershed District. Shoreland rules. Section 78-1221 Subdivision/ platting provisions apply to this subdivision. The Planning Commission and City Council will need to consider the following in determining land suitability for subdivision: (1) Susceptibility to flooding; (2) Existence of wetlands; (3) Soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development; (4) Severe erosion potential; (5) Steep topography; (6) Inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities; (7) Near-shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water-based recreation; (8) Important fish and wildlife habitat; (9) Presence of significant historic sites; or (10) Any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Additional information will be required as part of the preliminary plat process: (c)Information requirements. Sufficient information must be submitted by the applicant for the city to make a determination of land suitability. In addition to information required by other provisions in this chapter and chapter 82,the following information shall also be submitted: (1) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals showing limiting site characteristics. (2)The surface water features required in Minn. Stat. § 505.02, subd. 1, to be shown on plats, obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more accurate sources. (3)Adequate soils information to determine suitability for building and on-site sewage treatment capabilities for every lot from the most current existing sources or from field investigations, such as soil borings, percolation tests or other methods. (4) Information regarding adequacy of domestic water supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations; near-shore aquatic conditions, including depths,types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and proposed methods for controlling storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction activities. (5) Location of 100-year floodplain areas and floodway districts from existing adopted maps or data. (6)A line or contour representing the ordinary high water level, the toe and the top of bluffs, and the minimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. Utilities. Stormwater. It is advised to meet with the watershed district early to understand their permitting requirements. Three lots(the two pink lots and the existing home) will trigger stormwater management. All lots will be served by municipal sanitary sewer services, at the developers expense. The sanitary sewer main will need to be extended to the north,with individual lots served by service lines. Conservation Design. City Code requires conservation design for projects either greater than 5 acres,or at densities greater than one unit per 2 acres. We can support a waiver of the conservation design requirement in lieu of identifying substantial trees(Oaks, Maple, Basswood,etc. greater than 6' DBH) Variances/waivers necessary Based on the information available,the following waivers or variances are identified: ■ Cul de sac length • Right of way width • Paved surface width • Conservation Design • Road or driveway improvements within the 75 lake yard. • Fill in the floodplain • Variances for future lot improvement To maximize the benefit of the sketch plan process, it is recommended that a surveyor or civil engineer prepare responses to these comments. Please feel free to contact me at 952.249.4626 or by email at jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions on the above. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Jeremy Barnhart,AICP Community Development Director 1360 & 1370 Baldur Park Rd MCWD Permitting Requirements MCWD Rules Triggered: Erosion Control, Floodplain Alteration,Wetland Protection Erosion Control Requirements: • Confirm total square feet of disturbance&total cubic yards of excavation/fill/stockpiling • Erosion Control Best Management Practices (BMPS)such as silt fence or bio logs installed around areas downgradient to work area. • Rock construction entrance installed Floodplain Alteration Requirements: • Provide total cubic yards of floodplain fill and cut, mitigation for fill should at the very least be at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation calculations need to be signed off on by a professional engineer. • Modeling/calculations to show that floodplain work will not result in impact to neighboring properties at 1340& 1376 Baldur Park Rd. • Zoomed in map of the section north of the proposed road to determine extent of work in relation to floodplain given close proximity to floodplain. Wetland Protection Requirements: • Establishment of 25'wide wetland buffer required for construction of new single family homes. • Wetland buffer signs to be installed at each property line the buffer extends into and as needed to denote the contour of the buffer,with a maximum spacing of no more than 100' between signs. • If needed, buffer averaging may be done, maximum reduction width being 50%of the buffer width (12.5') and maximum buffer increase width being 200% of the buffer(50'). Areas of reduction or increase should be called out on plan and adjusted widths labeled. Should also include calculation on site plan to show no loss in total buffer area. • Confirmation on existing vegetation, proposed vegetation list for buffer. Administrative items: • Maintenance Declaration for buffer to be recorded with Hennepin County, MCWD would require a copy of recorded document. • 14 Day Public Notice due to floodplain and wetland protection being triggered by project, notification sent out to all residents within 600' of project site. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE August 14th, 2018 Jeremy Barnhart City of Orono Community Development Director 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Baldur Park Sketch Plan-4 lots Northwest of 1376 Baldur Park, Orono Mr. Barnhart, The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(District)was requested to review a sketch plan for a possible new platted lot on Baler Park. From a preliminary review,the proposed development of a new lot would consolidate four existing parcels into one and would trigger the District's Erosion Control, Floodplain Alteration, and Wetland Protection rules.The Stormwater Management rule would be applicable if anything other than one single family home is proposed. Floodplain Alteration The District's Floodplain Alteration rule is applicable for any project that proposed land disturbance below the 100-year floodplain elevation. The 100-year floodplain for Lake Minnetonka is 931.5' and the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) is 929.4'. Existing conditions indicate that a large portion of the site is below the 100-year floodplain. Per the District's rule, and fill brought in below the 100-year floodplain will have to compensated for at a 1:1 ratio between 931.5' and 929.4' (ie, 10 cubic yards of fill require 10 cubic yards of compensatory storage. Compensatory storage must be created between the 100-year floodplain and the OHWL). All low openings will need two feet of freeboard above the 100-year floodplain elevation which would be a minimum of 933.5'. Floodplain alteration that results in greater than 50 cubic yard of fill will be required to submit an as-built survey upon project completion. Wetland Protection The District's Wetland Protection rule is applicable for any project that proposes an impact to a wetland and the Buffer provisions of the rule are applicable to new single family homes that propose an increase in impervious surface. Based on District's Function Assessment of Wetlands (FAW),there is a Preserve Management Class wetland present on the southwestern portion of the peninsula. Per section 6(f) of the rule, new principal residential structures are required to apply a 25'wetland buffer upgradient from the edge of the delineated wetland. Per section 6(c),the buffer can be averaged down to 50% (12.5') We collaborate with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water for current and future generations. 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard,Minnetonka,MN 55345 • (952)471-0590 • Fax:(952)471-0682 • www.minnehahacreek.org and out to 200% (50') as long as the minimum buffer width is maintained at all points and there is no loss in total buffer area provided. Wetland buffer areas that are proposed to be disturbed by grading or other site activities will be required to submit a monitoring and maintenance plan in accordance with sections 7 and 10 of the rule along with a financial assurance of no less than $5,000. To determine the extent of the wetland, a wetland delineation will be required to confirm the Boundary and Type. MCWD is the Local Unit of Government(LUG) responsible for implementing the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in the City of Orono. Any wetland fringe below the OHW (929.4') is Public Waters Wetland and would be regulated by the DNR (only applicable if impacts are proposed). Erosion Control The District's Erosion Control rule is applicable to any project that proposes 5,000 square of land disturbance or 50 cubic yards of excavation/fill. A standard erosion control plan will be required. Please reference the District's Erosion Control Checklist found at http://www.minnehahacreek.org/permits/permit-information-and-applications for required exhibits. Administrative Items and Timeline The District's Floodplain Alteration and Wetland Protection rules are considered to be non-fast track permits and require a 14 day public notice to residents within 600' of the property. The WCA requires a 15 business day Notice of Application period before a Notice of Decision can be issued. Additionally,the wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required to be declared against the property in the form of a maintenance declaration between the District and the property owner. As the proposed concept sketch will result in a significant portion of floodplain disturbance. District Staff recommend that the property owner,or a representative on their behalf, contact the District for a pre-application meeting early on in the planning phase. Please contact me at 952-641-4504 or hquinn@minnehahacreek.org if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Heidi Quinn Permitting Technician Enclosure: Site Sketch We collaborate with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water for current and future generations. 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard,Minnetonka,MN 55345 • (952)471-0590 • Fax:(952)471-0682 • www.minnehahacreek.org 2i N \\\\ \y O b t // ! \ o Lia �' ! !�, a \ k \ (\-\\\ 'se' „.......y / liy. \\‘:\‘ os Illi c.) \\\ % ,•'� o / 7:1' / 41:///c‘ls'i\ • P4/ t'r-, / \\ lc" 0 1 j\�`i 1 /1 /i ' \\‘ \\\ b` ` /(.. N O ' \\\\ % Q. vi/ i'''6- '<-5: / 1 !' 3 .g. / }fit �,11/ /il , a , ir /I 4r ° -\ / 5.N..`fir Ilt J $ \ / III w t / I I , i%i + , j �`6 I, ---/ ' / 1 7 r I '' 1 N 11 %1/ i 'ic Ii \ // I -Ritilw• 1( -41111;:10 / c ,/// ' i i I %rll 1 c4 `' N U �' �0 l+ i ', Milk N lit N / i//` / i I IMPI t\ e 1 I II ,1 1 la / Y 1 ° i/I /� l / 8 ...9, U <Cs \ li l } ,'1/ l / 1 1 I c; 01 In \ i 1.) \ rii .. it t ti I i/ 1...,- 11 ! �4 1� �� // j/ �jl1 1 1 i \ PI t �I !7 i h / e°}§ `'\ •I i 01 -.I I P‘ \ \ Ill 1 II 'I 1 s - \\\. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Jeff Gossen 4260 6th Ave N 9/27/18 W18-33 ® Attach site locator map Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions [' Deny Summary(or attach): Ben Carlson (BWSR) attended field verification and agreed with the revised boundary. No other TEP comments received. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 10/19/18 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions(include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): Fred Puzak has applied for wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 1340 Baldur Park Road, and adjacent unassigned parcels in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Section 8, Township 117N, Range 23W, PIDs 0811723310006-0811723310018. The boundary/type approval was requested on September 24, 2018. A wetland delineation was conducted by Jacobson Environmental on September 21, 2018. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on September 24, 2018. One wetland was delineated on site. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 3, shallow marsh wetland. MCWD and BWSR reviewed the boundaries in the field on October 5, 2018. The boundaries of the wetland were adjusted as shown in the attached revised delineation figure to encompass areas meeting hydric soils criteria and with high obligate sedge frequency. The area upgradient from the cattails is currently mowed, and therefore is a disturbed vegetative circumstance. It is anticipated that during spring conditions,when ground water is approximately at the ordinary high water elevation of the lake, saturated soils would be found within 12 inches of the surface up to the 930.4 contour, furhter BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 evidenced by the high freqiuency of the sedges. Flags were moved up to ten feet further from the proposed wetland boundary. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the attached revised boundary and type figure from the original submittal.This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Elizabeth Showalter Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail 10/19/18 (952)641-4518 eshowalter@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 Z Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and$100 fee to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski-stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Carlson-ben.carlson@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP Becky Horton-becky.horton@state.mn.us DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Jason Spiegel Jason.spiegel@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Fred Puzak-f.puzak@comcast.net ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Melanie Curtis- mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us,Wayne Jacobson-jacobsonenv@msn.com ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Justin Berndt- Justin.T.Berndt@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION >For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf >For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf >Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Hwy.2 Div.Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 >For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: ® Approved wetland boundaries BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 �yRBS Jr r § a . , - 4-4 u 0 Old Crystal Bay Rd Sa"' q ' Yy k- p k III m S h S t ` QJ Alti't v l 2 - t U ' n s s v Z* eaves Pant as m9 a p m - £a y5=k d -, h a `S' f 4 * s c ' as x mac} : ElP n r.. ` t 1 r,,,..',,,-,i7, 0 pad' r - � mN. i € ._ fit. ZS 8 n y, 5 ,". co Ci: '`'3 ' .k• - Q. E § { ; xc;�`arc^.rc, * :` '.: y t. Q g.'. �. 003 V, �F '` ;`E a a � n 4�sib North-Share DrW /�� 'c -a ,. .. Via'`. x Figure 5 Delineation Map (7- , j , ----------- ,.\ s \\\....:4 :4r. . ( 1111 \ ''' '''' * ' ' . ' .\' ' ' : 1 . \ 1 ,,„!..,Ti;t4, \ ,,,\..,:*\:,,, ,s,,,.'`'Not.\,. , ,is..7,4,.,,,,,, i :'p. i \ \ , 4111,r \\,\ \''\'\N4 "°44.,,t,:, 1 ! \ lJ \ ` i , 41 1 \\\ \ \ MyJ � \ __ -121":14'' • ` \\ 7, _ . , , . __________.„....,,, ,,.. , \,, , .,. 1 „,...„ . , . ici:i„ . . ,. 4) gi:.,.&.-1...-- -': V•1 / ' 1.2-UP '7"'—''''''' : ,N\ \,\ ' V ','---,..'::.'-.-',-,,-.--7:_,''-..._----,','\.'''''e.'.,0-...,1'' 1-1-Us .. Basin 1 1-1- T . \ -,' % 0.060 acres G o44 x // / _ r/ Map layers N • Sample Point ' \ \ nepin Co7 1 /:;,/*/ contour_2f_3m \ \ _� 0 .01 .02 .03 Miles Wetland Boundary\\'-.74. '":4 �� .�. i 1 A. A , From: Christian Johnson To: Jeremy Barnhart Cc: Julie Johnson Subject: Re:Baldur Park Rd development Date: Monday,August 20,2018 3:18:16 PM Thanks Jeremy- Here are my comments for the Planning Commissiion. I just heard about this proposal yesterday,but if it proceeds I may have some additional comments during the planning process. To Planning Commission: I have concerns about the proposed development due to the number of exceptions and variances that would need to be made to accommodate this property. I am especially concerned about the increased traffic travelling across my driveway. There is also a significant amount of summer traffic crossing my property to access the 5 boat slips that Mr. Puzak currently rents out and I'm wondering if this will continue as his property is further developed? Some of this traffic is traveling at a speed that is too fast for a tight, curving driveway. In addition, Mr.Puzak has no expense of maintaining or clearing snow from the portion of my driveway that he uses and now is looking to increase usage. Chris Johnson 1376 Baldur Park Rd. On Mon,Aug 20,2018 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Hi Chris, I will be handling the proposed development on Baldur Park,you can direct questions/comments to me in the future. Yes,the property owner,though their consultant/contractor, has applied for a sketch plan to plat 4 lots into 1 to construct a home. We have identified some issues that need to be resolved, outlined in the attached staff report. If the project moves forward, a public hearing will be held for the preliminary plat. If you would like to add any comments for the Commission tonight,feel free to send them my way. Jeremy Barnhart, MCP Community Development Director Direct 952.249.4626 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 3. LA18-000068 SVEN GUSTAFSON ON BEHALF OF 1350 BALDUR,LLC,PIDS 08-117-23-31-0006 THROUGH 08-117-23-31-0009,BALDUR PARK ROAD,SKETCH PLAN,6:38 P.M.—7:09 P.M. Sven Gustafson,Applicant,was present. Barnhart noted this is a sketch plan application for a plat on Baldur Park to combine four lots into one lot for the purposes of constructing a new single-family home. This is not a subdivision or the splitting of a lot. There is an existing house at the point. When looking at a plat,the City has to look at a couple of different scenarios. When the property is platted in the proposed manner, it will create a back lot,which is prohibited by City ordinances. Barnhart stated there is not a lot of details available in terms of grading or configuration of roads and that the applicant is looking for guidance from the Planning Commission on the issues outlined in the Staff report. Overall the property is generally flat or very close to the ordinary high water line, so flooding or floodplain issues may come into play on this development. A wetland may be located on the site which will need to be delineated. Both of those items are important in determining minimum lot size and more information will need to be provided. Baldur Park is a platted public road and does not actually touch this property on land. A copy of an easement,if one exists, will need to be provided, or else additional information will need to be submitted showing how the property will access the road. Generally a cul-de-sac would be required at the end of a public road to provide a turnaround for emergency vehicles. The lack of frontage onto Baldur Park Road prevents a cul-de-sac within the Baldur Park Road right-of-way unless additional right-of-way is platted. The proposed plat appears to be consistent with the Orono 2030 Community Management Plan. As a sketch plan, it has been submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and those comments will need to be incorporated into the plan at some point. A Conservation Design plan is not required since this is a proposed plat and not a subdivision. A tree removal plan will be required since there are several large trees on the property,many of which will need to be removed to accommodate construction. The issues identified by Staff include frontage of the property. Issues for discussion: 1. Front lot/back lot. Platting the property as proposed will create an easement back lot. Does the Planning Commission feel a waiver from the prohibition of an easement back lot is warranted? 2. The 75-foot lake yard variance. Because of the narrow width of the peninsula, any improvement of the subject lot will require 75-foot lake yard setback variances. Does the Commission support the placement of a lot in the location,requiring variances? An alternative lot location further at the point would prevent the need for a variance. 3. Does the Commission feel that adjustments to the lot area requirements are justified? Page 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Staff does not support the proposal as drafted due to the following: a. The proposal creates a nonconforming parcel by virtue of creating an easement back lot. b. Access to the lot is in question and information supporting access rights to the development have not been provided. c. The lot proposed requires a lake yard setback to improve the property. Staff recommends a lot be created at or nearer the point that does not require a lake setback to develop. Thiesse asked if they would require 30 feet to create an outlot. Barnhart indicated they would need a 30-foot wide outlot to provide access to the front lot/back lot. The City would also look for some sort of turnaround within the development. This plat is similar to a recent application approved on Ivy Place. In that situation,the developer agreed to provide onsite turnarounds and sprinkler the buildings to help offset the challenges created by the long road ending in a dead end. Thiesse asked what this would do to the development of the next lots down. Barnhart stated the sketch plan does not address that and that they are simply proposing to plat these four lots into one buildable lot. Thiesse asked if it would preclude them from developing those lots. Barnhart stated it would depend on whether the Planning Commission was okay with waiving the access for the proposed lot. The front lot/back lot situation basically allows them to create this lot and then one additional lot that would be accessed via the outlot. Thiesse asked if a cul-de-sac would need to be constructed if the Planning Commission is not agreeable with the front lot/back lot. Barnhart stated that is one of the options. Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, stated this is a unique property since it is located on a peninsula and is narrow. To develop the property in any way would require some variances and that they are here looking for some feedback and direction on how best to proceed with developing it. In regards to the road, currently Baldur Park Road is 12 feet wide and it would not make much sense to have a 24-foot wide road at the end of the 12-foot road. Gustafson stated they are looking at an outlot that would serve some lots beyond this property. Gustafson stated they do not know about the wetlands at this point. Once the wetland is delineated,that will likely drive some changes. Gustafson stated obviously the 75-foot lakeshore setbacks are impossible to meet no matter what they do with the lot lines. Chair Thiesse asked for public comment at 6:49 p.m. Page 2 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Cindy McDonnell, 1420 Baldur Park Road, stated she has a concern about the proposal. Baldur Park Road is brand new since the flood of 2014,and if this lot requires a lot of fill,the trucks hauling in the fill may damage the road and she would like some assurances that repairs will be made to the road if any occur. McDonnell stated if there is going to be future development down at the peninsula, she would like to see a turnaround since this will generate some additional traffic down the road,which needs to be taken into consideration. Currently the area is somewhat of an eyesore for the whole neighborhood and in her view the neighbors' property values are being impacted by that. There were no further public comments. Barnhart noted an e-mail was received this afternoon regarding the property, which has been provided to the Planning Commission. Thiesse asked about access. Barnhart stated access can likely be resolved by review of the easement. Gustafson stated there is an easement that provides access across the neighboring property,which is Lot 20, and that he can provide additional information on that. Thiesse asked if he is amenable to moving the house down a couple of lots with a road and cul-de-sac for emergency vehicles. Gustafson stated they will take all the feedback they receive tonight and consider it. Erickson commented it would be nice to see a rough plan for the rest of the area to give the Planning Commission a better idea of what is being contemplated. Thiesse stated the applicant is asking for approval for a portion of the property and that it is likely they will use it as a practical difficulty. Erickson agreed that there is a question about what happens after these variances are granted. Gustafson stated a turnaround or a cul-de-sac for this area probably makes sense,but that a cul-de-sac or turnaround for the entire neighborhood at the end of the road is probably not something the property owners are interested in doing. Thiesse indicated he has difficulty creating a substandard lot but that there is no way to make it a conforming lot in all respects. Thiesse noted the City normally does not allow a front lot/back lot. Gustafson asked whether seeing a proposal that shows development of the entire peninsula would be easier for the Planning Commission. Thiesse commented that would be easier for him and that it appears this site needs the most work. Thiesse stated he would rather see the whole thing and that he has the most difficulty with this lot. Page 3 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Ressler suggested the applicant counter this plan with something to improve the situation and that they might not necessarily be helping the situation by keeping the road at 12 feet wide. Ressler stated they should look at balancing some of the difficulties the current residents encounter with the road by perhaps adding a turnaround on the property. Gustafson asked whether a turnaround on Lot 21 to allow better neighborhood and emergency vehicle access and turnaround would be beneficial. Thiesse commented that would be something to help the situation. The 75-foot section from two directions is also an issue. Thiesse stated he is not convinced that this is a buildable lot, which is another big concern. Lemke stated he is in agreement and that the proposal seems way too confirmed. Lemke stated in his view there is a need for an emergency vehicle turnaround and that the lot does not seem buildable. Gustafson asked whether emergency vehicles can make it down to the end of the road currently without a turnaround. Barnhart stated they can make it down to the end of the road. Erickson stated in a true emergency,the fire trucks could also cut across somebody's grass. Lemke stated he would also like to see a complete development plan so he can understand the full impact. Barnhart asked whether the Planning Commission would like to see a conforming access in the back. Thiesse stated that would be his preference. As it relates to the 75-foot setback, Thiesse noted it is a huge property and that they are proposing to chop off a very narrow piece. Thiesse stated he is struggling with the 75-foot setback since he is not convinced it is a buildable lot. Gustafson pointed out they are not chopping off one lot but are rather combining multiple properties into a larger lot. Ressler stated since it is not currently developed, it is a different situation, and that there will be more traffic generated and the need for emergency vehicles to travel down the road will increase. Gustafson stated the current access to the peninsula will not be made more difficult since that is what will remain but that there will just be a house there. Thiesse stated in his opinion it is a substandard road and that there is not much they can do to improve that situation, but they can try to improve whatever else they can. Lemke commented rather than have four unbuildable lots,they now have one unbuildable lot. Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commission feels adjustments to the lot area requirements are justified, including access or easements in lot area. Thiesse stated he is looking at an owner that owns a bunch of property and that there is a neighboring city that requires lots be combined if they are all under the same ownership. Page 4 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated this is a lot of record and that Orono has the same requirement. Barnhart noted the applicants are proposing a plat. Thiesse stated overall he is having difficulty with the 75-foot setbacks,the size of the lot,the access,and the turnaround. Ressler noted wetlands are not included in the lot area calculation. Barnhart stated in his view the issues are addressable and the next step is to take it to the City Council or the applicants can make changes to their proposal and bring it back to the Planning Commission. Gustafson stated they would like to take a look at the larger project and then decide what to do. Thiesse stated in regards to the fill,there typically is an inspection of the road prior to construction and an inspection after construction to determine whether any damage has occurred. Gustafson stated they likely will have to bring in some fill to construct the house,which is typical,but that they will not be filling in the wetland area. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. Page 5 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. LA18-000068 SVEN GUSTAFSON ON BEHALF OF 1350 BALDUR,LLC,BALDUR PARK ROAD, SKETCH PLAN Sven Gustafson,Applicant,was present. Barnhart stated this is a revised sketch plan from what was seen at the Planning Commission in September. It calls for the creation of a plat for a buildable lot on Baldur Park Road. Primarily the property owner is looking to create a parcel that would support a new house. The subject parcels are the six lots between the end of the development down towards the point. The developer is proposing platting three parcels in this area and the existing home is not included in the project at this point. Barnhart indicated there are two options for creating a buildable lot. The first option would be to create a front lot/back lot configuration,which requires an access outlot. Option 2 is to plat several lots and having either a public or private road to serve three or more lots. In response to Staff's comments and the Planning Commission discussion,the applicant has revised the plan and shows three new building lots and an Outlot A. Outlot A shows a proposed driveway and a turnaround at the southern end of the project. None of the three lots meet the required one-half acre. While Outlot A appears to be narrower than 30 feet adjacent to Parcels 23 and 24,Outlot A will, in fact, need to be a road since it will be serving more than three lots. This right-of-way width needs to be 50 feet per ordinance. However, Staff can support a waiver of the right-of-way and paved road width due to the width of the existing Baldur Park Road, provided fire department standards are maintained. Staff recommends the City Council discuss the following: 1. Cul-de-sac length. Baldur Park Road is over 1,000 feet from its intersection of Birch Lane to the subject property. The standard is 1,000 feet. There are no other options to continue Baldur Park Road and plat the property. Staff supports the waiver. 2. Right-of-way width. Much of Baldur Park Road right-of-way width is 30 feet. The standard for new streets is 50 feet. Staff supports the waiver. 3. Paved surface width. Much of Baldur Park Road is 18 feet paved width. The standard for streets Serving 3-10 units is 28 feet. For more than 10 units, 32 feet is required. Staff supports a waiver of no less than 20 feet through the new section. 4. Cul-de-sac. The latest plans show a turn-around, which is adequate if only two lots are proposed. If there are three lots, a road is required. Staff does not support waiving the cul-de-sac requirement. 5. Conservation Design. Because the lots proposed are smaller than two acres,the project would require Conservation Design. Staff supports a waiver of the full design in lieu of wetland delineation and a tree inventory where building pads are proposed. 6. Road or driveway improvements within the 75-foot lake yard. The southern portion of the point is very narrow, approximately 100-120 feet. Construction of a home within the 75-foot lake yard is unavoidable. Staff supports shifting house pads to the north to avoid or minimize conflicts with lake yards. Page 11 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 8,2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 7. Fill in the floodplain. Based on preliminary plans, it appears that the house pads will require fill to elevate above the flood elevation. This may be resolved with more detail being provided and/or shifting the house pads further to the north. The Council is asked to provide non-binding feedback on the issues presented. Walsh asked if the applicant would be permitted to build a house on each one of the small lots. Barnhart stated technically they could not but since there is no existing home,they could combine the lots to get as close to the requirement as possible. There is enough land to meet the one-acre minimum. Printup noted on Maple Place those were platted lots and they were able to build on them. Barnhart stated it might be that those lots meet the 66 percent requirement of the DNR. If a lot exceeds 66 percent of the DNR's requirements for lot size, they can be developed. The lots on Baldur Park do not meet that requirement. Barnhart noted there is a clause in the code that says when they own contiguous lakeshore properties,they can combine them to get as close as possible to the lot size requirement, and in this case they have enough to meet the one-acre requirement. City Attorney Mattick stated if the lots are nonconforming but meet certain minimum requirements,such as the 66 percent,they are allowed to build. If they do not meet that requirement,the statute says if the lots are under common ownership,they have to combine them to get it to the minimum conforming size and not the 66 percent. Printup asked what is being proposed for the other lots at the point. Barnhart stated part of Staff's recommendation is to include a plan for those five lots since that would impact the width of the road and emergency services. Printup asked if the City should plan for five future lots. Walsh stated the plan could change the next day and that the City has to plan for the worst possible scenario. Printup asked if there is an easement over the property. Barnhart stated to his knowledge there is an easement but nothing was platted for access. In the past the City vacated a portion of the road because it was in the water. Printup asked if those easements can be cleaned up as part of this plat. Barnhart stated from a planning perspective,they are open to not having it be a public street beyond a certain point. Baldur Park Road could terminate in a cul-de-sac,with a private road or a shared driveway beyond the cul-de-sac. Walsh stated a private road can only serve so many homes. Barnhart stated the road could serve a number of homes and that they are within the allowable range. Page 12 of 18 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 8,2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. Printup commented he would like to see the easements get cleaned up. Crosby asked if the proposed lots are conforming. Barnhart indicated they are not and that they would need to combine lots in order to get to the half-acre minimum. Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, stated the City Council has provided some good direction and that he is here to answer questions. Mark Gronberg, Gronberg&Associates, indicated they looked at some of the lot sizes in the area and that there are a number of lots that are way under the 0.5 threshold. Gronberg asked how that would play into this. Walsh stated the City Council has to deal with the current codes,and unless there is some kind of inherent difficulty,they need to follow that. Walsh commented a cul-de-sac is probably necessary,but he will leave whether the road should be public or private up to the applicant. Gronberg noted a cul-de-sac does take up quite a bit of room and that there are some floodplain issues. As a result,a turnout would work a lot better than a cul-de-sac. Gustafson stated the Planning Commission appeared to be in favor of a hammerhead or a turnout. Printup commented he would like to see the cul-de-sac as one option. Gustafson asked how far the cul-de-sac would be from the water. Gronberg indicated it would be close to the water. Walsh stated that could be considered a practical difficulty,and because the current road is not as wide as it should be,there is some flexibility there. Gronberg noted the area is so narrow in some spots that they will have to encroach into the 75-foot setback. Gronberg asked if there is a magical number on that. Wash stated there are some inherent practical difficulties, which the Council understands, and that they should follow Staff's recommendations. The City Council took no formal action on this item. (A recess was taken from 8:32 p.m. to 8:40 p.m.) 15. LA18-000079 LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC,3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST,SKETCH PLAN Curt Fretham and Perry Ryan, Lakewest Development,were present. Page 13 of 18 LA19-000084 Baldur Park Road Sketch November 13, 2019 Engineering Comments: 1. Roadway-The pavement is shown at 18 feet in width. The Code requires 32 feet however the proposed 18 feet is consistent with the existing roadway. With the narrowness of the road we may need to consider restricting parking to only one side of the roadway to ensure a lane remains open to traffic and emergency vehicles. 2. Right of Way- The right of way appears to be 20 feet wide; one foot on each side of the pavement. The code requires 50 feet however the right of way at the existing road is 30 feet. I would recommend the proposed right of way be at least consistent with the existing at 30 feet. In addition to facilitating maintenance operations this would also provide room for utilities without them being under the pavement. 3. Connection to existing Right of Way- There is not a right of way/easement across 1376 Baldur Park that would allow a connection of the existing roadway to the proposed roadway. An easement/right of way in favor of the city should be procured from the property owner at 1376 in order to facilitate the roadway extension and the extension of any public utilities to service the new development. 4. Floodplain-Floodplain mitigation is proposed on site to offset proposed floodplain fill. The applicant will be required to obtain a MCWD permit for this work, and the mitigation volume will need to be equal to or greater than the fill. 5. Wetlands-Wetland impacts and buffers will need to be approved by MCWD as well. Impacts may not be approved unless a good argument can be made for wetland fill. 6. A sewer main extension will be required to provide sewer service to the new and existing homes. They may not share a service connection. Adam AWN O CITY OF ORONO MEMORANDUM -s. A. 0.'kEsuoiLt DATE: November 18, 2019 TO: Chair Ressler, Planning Commissioners Dustin Rief, City Administrator FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director RE: Proposed PC Liaisons to City Council, 2020 The following is a proposed schedule for Planning Commission member attendance at Council Meetings in 2020. The Planning Commission will provide a liaison for the first Council meeting of the month only. Meeting Date Representative January 13 Mark McCutcheon ®ruary 10 ' '' +'hn Thie l P14].;4044Z, 11 March 9 Matt Gettman - April 13 .3.'-'24',! Chris Bollis May 11 Jon Ressler r` June : Bob Erickson e July 13 Dennis Libby -'........:1-..;,„: 'gust 10 ark r� Cu 44- September 14 TBD* 4 -r October 12 ""--a41 4 November Chris Bollis december 1, ' µ 4' 7 *The Commission term of John Thiesse expires at the end of March, 2020. Planning Commission Action Requested Motion to approve the schedule for planning commission member attendance at Council Meetings in 2020.