The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHouse abandoned SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY Addr: 900 Spring Hill Rd. PID: 26-118-23 44 0003 Building Type : guest house # BRs/GPD: 1 # Systems/units : 1/1 Permit No: none Date of Permit : Installer: Day Plbg. System Type : standard trench Appliances : SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 9 DF condition: 14 Failure Pot : medium SEPTIC TANKS Material : concrete block Capacity: Setback to Bldg: 35 DRAINFIELD Length of Lines : No. Lines : Trench Width: Treatment Area: Type of Filter: Tile Size : Under Tile : Perc Rate mn/in: Setback DF-Bldg: DF Ht above WT: 0 . 5 Soil Type : Limitations : water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks : Well-DF: Report in File? : Pump Type : Depth: Diameter: Method: INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD Date Compliance Date Gallons 7/6/79 system not located-no surfacing 3 7/1/81 system not located 3 7/27/81 tank located 3 8/28/86 no surfacing 3 6/25/90 no surfacing 3 1/1/92 system classification criteria changed 2 7/24/95 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/97 3 )400E /1-677./b0/JeD u gv N. CITY OF ORONO O Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 ti p_ Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ` r ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT 4 ' ', 4 1: 4AO .$ INSPECTION REPORT 9kESH0� Owner: ')'I%\ l�l ( ñ/&' Address: 90 //( )y,/)) ,l Permit #'s: he. Dates: — Contractors: �� City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono a inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is X an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of uns turated soil or sand between the distribution devii in s i characteristics. /Kar,( _ __„/. k� I2-3y 97 (The limiting soil characteristic [ has or [ ] has not been identified at hi)s time.t Ilfl�the limiting soil 1 7 characteristic has not been identi ie this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): 47 Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): f4L Drainfield inspection indicates: 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extep ...asd cnndit' n u-__nknowwn. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): /'iCCrf/� � COMM TS: iii, �! C!,tSi P .d • 1 - ' /0.�('s AO L _`3 V , h!, IA �� a ► L3.4.1.t f T s. 'lam. SP►� muter' � ____ i' .�1f�'a • X lI : 1'1 2=i �. •A_.'_►� I. i� . �r% c' v ."I. .. ., a. .. rooi �i=' AIVAiI. 17312 al Gad Date of Inspection Set c 'ystem Inspe tor 12-x . Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT CITY INSPECTION REPORT OF POST OFFICE BOX 66 ORONO 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER 4610 ////on7V14e44DS - ` /lA PERMIT NO.'S. DATES CONTRACTORS by %' City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is CA an existing system 0 new construction) Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. El2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly; no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. ig 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction, or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is.necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( (I Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: 0 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 0 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ,YrK Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. 0 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system condition) ❑ Adequate ❑ High water table Low Did Fair ❑ Lot size Medium ❑ Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream 0 High 0 Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑System is causing visible s rface discharge. COMMENTS. /JI / / /fl 01) ,I #S /, / // e -/ee / 7D occv e# CI41I� - 19') 3-4z,ZI/ k, Al/In z 76,44 jee/,___ Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner .�\ On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT CITY INSPECTION REPORT OF POST OFFICE BOX 66 ORONO 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 SPR' \Atc CLgrEK tJ. OWNER ADDRESS ��'�� PERMIT NO.'S. DATES CONTRACTORS (]AY f'6L3 City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above ddress has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is an existing system 0 new construction) ED1 Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. El2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly; no major \ upgrading of the system is required at this time. SIL—iJl 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction, or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action) ank inspection indicates: 0 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years,they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. ' should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks ainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. U Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped 0 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 0 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. 0 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,wateruture Expansion ❑ Soil t ble,and system condition) Adequate ❑ High water table \❑ Low 0 Fair ❑ Lot size `C`] Medium 0 Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream 0 High 0 Inadequate ❑ Drainage 0 System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS: /44.g7«-S7- 7 m c-6? ?-(4.„,..._ Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner oc) Thlozz)40_ Tamarack Investments, Inc. 8201995 1? April 18, 1995 City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ATTENTION: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: SPRING HILL CENTER COMPLEX Orono, MN - Conditional Use Permit Dear Ms. Mabusth: As per the terms of the Conditional Use Permit, Resolution No. 2956, adopted April 22, 1991, granted to the Spring Hill Land Company Limited Partnership by the City of Orono and by the Partnership's letter to the City dated April 22, 1991, please accept the following as Spring Hill's fourth annual report: 1) The Spring Hill Center Complex continues to operate as a Conference Center contracting with organizations as required by your ordinance for conferences, retreats and educational purposes only. 2) The regular lessess of the facility during 1994 were as follows: a) Freshwater Foundation b) Woodridge Church 3) Woodridge Church conducted regular religious services on the premises on Sundays and used the premises for other church related activities during certain other days of the week. 4) Freshwater Foundation operated its offices on the site regularly during 1994 and sponsored occasional events. 5) Other activities included conferences, retreats or educational seminars for Dorsey &Whitney, Mn. Humanities, Resource Day, Minneapolis Public Schools, Highview High School, Communication Workers, Sierra Club, and several different groups from the University of Minnesota. Also, Swedish Television CH1 Light Entertainment from Stockholm, Sweden, setup offices, did broadcasting and resided at the Center for nearly two months during the summer of 1994. 445 East Lake Street • Wayzata, MN 55391-1665 • Phone (612) 473-3332 • FAX (612) 473-0152 City of Orono April 18, 1995 ATTN: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Page 2 of 2 Zoning Administrator 6) Operation of the Spring Hill Center Complex continues in 1995 with Freshwater Foundation and Woodridge Church being the present lessess. The conference center/church operations continue as permitted. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to give me a call at (612) 473-3332. Very truly yours, SPRING HILL LAND COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By •rin• Hill Land Company Its t'- -e .I Partner .� Pampuch eneral Manager Agent for Owner Duncan N. Dayton