Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-19-2019 Planning Commission Packet PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE C,1, `IY 'I C) 0 COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. p .� q3 =CM p y E� t �,_bF �;s a�'i�-', i �'!b<�� ,R!'''LOT u'4" r D 1.:F(`� I 'i;- PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. (AL U `1\cd-, re_n -P r Z--113 �y 3 2. ,e. ....:`' -'� � FAI4-‘44 ty) �v t t 2`t (71 Si') 3. i AVNi 2 s or,,t- 4. ? GCCVv L 11<- 1 ti10 LQ (of - ,- )80© A-Lh 7A 3 0(14Cz--') g) d 72_4.7 6. �'� �G PAtvrgio vte> f566 L,oice 7. )6- \// , 4A fih 4Iz._ V?°_715v 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday, August 19,2019, 6:30 P.M. �� Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 1kFsxo�� 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet— located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Victoria Seals Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes July 15, 2019 New Business 1. LA19-000049 Peter Eskuche, 2605 North Shore Drive, Variances and Interim Use Permit (Staff: Laura Oakden) 2. LA19-000054 John Kraemer, 855 Old Crystal Bay Road S, Interim Use Permit (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 3. LA19-000055 Hendel Homes, 3345 Fox Street,After-the-fact Interim Use Permit (Staff: Laura Oakden) 4. LA19-000056 Gregg Katchmark, 140 Leaf Street, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 5. LA19-000057 Wayzata Country Club,430 Old Long Lake Road,Conditional Use Permit and Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. LA19-000058 West Bay Homes, 1080 Heritage Lane, Interim Use Permit (Staff: Laura Oakden) 7. LA19-000053 City of Orono, Text Amendment, Average Lakeshore Setback Regulations (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 8. Update on August 12, 2019 City Council meeting Adjourn Planning Commission Liaison to September 9, 2019 City Council meeting: Jon Ressler Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Date Application Received: June 19,2019 �O1 VO Date Application Considered as Complete:August 8,2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: October 7,2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members yet Dustin Rief, City Administrator &ESHOI`ff. From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: LA19-000049, Eskuche, 2605 North Shore Drive,Variances and Interim Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for hardcover, buildings, and retaining walls in the 75' lakeyard,average lakeshore setback,side yard setback and lot area; as well as an IUP-Alteration over 50 cubic yards of material within the 75' lakeshore setback to construct a new home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance and interim use permit. Background This is a unique property in that an inlet from Lake Minnetonka encroaches into the lot, establishing an additional 75 lake yard into the lot. The applicant is proposing to build a new home, replacing the existing structure. The existing home sits forward of the 75' lakeyard setback,about X feet from the Lake Minnetonka and X feet from the inlet. The applicant proposes the new home further back away from the lakeshore,Y feet from the Lake, and Y feet from the inlet. The proposal includes the removal of hardcover on the west side of the property and turn this space into a usable lawn area. To minimize the inlet encroachment,the applicant proposes to move the home closer to the east side property line, into the east side yard setback. The proposal also includes new hardcover for a patio within the 75' lake yard. Due to the existing home being located in the 75' lakeyard an interim use permit is required for movement of earth over 50 cubic yards in the lakeyard. To remove the existing home and create a lawn space as well as construct the new home, new grading will new done within the lake yard. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 -Builing Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Street 50' Roughly 290' Roughly 235' Side (west) 30' Roughly 90' 105' Side (east) 30' 24' 19' Lakeshore(main) 75' 30' 46' Lakeshore (inlet) 75' Roughly 50' Roughly 54' Average Lakeshore New Retaining wall exceeds 42" LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 2 of 6 Section 78-305 -Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) 230' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 81,213 s.f. (1.86 acre) Allowed: 16,242.6 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 5,729 s.f. (7%) Section 78-1680-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay District in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 1 81,213 s.f 20,303 s.f. 17,353 s.f. w/in 14,450 s.f. w/in (25%) (21.37%) 75' (17,79%) 75' Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Side Setback Variance (78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met;such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicants request for additional variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above.Therefore, lot area variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Average Lakeshore Setback, Buildings and retaining walls in the 75' Lakeshore (78-1279) The existing home sits almost entirely within the 75' lakeyard setback. The new home will take advantage of the existing homes footprint and massing. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance due to proposed retaining walls which exceed the 42inch height maximum. The retaining walls will establish a flat usable lawn space along the side of the home. Retaining walls are also shown within the 75' lakeshore along the front/lakeside of the home. These walls will sit in the same footprint and the existing deck and will be used to create the patio/terrace area. LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 3 of 6 The new home is proposed to meet average lakeshore setback but the building will encroach into the 75'setback along the eastern and western edge of the home due to the property being almost entirely surrounded by lakeshore. Roughly 1,000 sq.ft. of the XXX new home is located outside of the existing massing and is a new encroachment in the 75' setback. Hardcover in the 75' Lakeshore (78-1680) The exiting home covers over 21% of the lot in hardcover the new proposed home will decrease the overall hardcover to 17.79%. The new home is proposing a new patio/terrace which takes advantage of the existing patio footprint. The new patio encroaches in the 75' lakeshore of the property, roughly 75 sq.ft_The new patio and building encroachments are considered new hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Interim Use Permit- Movement of material exceeds 50 CY within the 75' lakeyard (78-1726) The applicant is proposing to cut roughly 310 cubic yards of material and fill roughly 650 cubic yards of material all within the 75' lakeyard. The existing home is located within the lakeyard and to remove this home, add the new home, and restore the grade for lawn space grading work will need to take place. The proposed grading and home are not out of character with the neighborhood. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The goal of the ordinance sis to reduce or eliminate improvements in the lake yard, the proposal shifts away from the lake yard as much as practical. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot,in the proposed location within the lake,and side yard setbacks, appears to be reasonable as the property's reduced size and LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 4 of 6 orientation with respect to the lakeshore. The hardcover and retaining walls proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lake and its inlet limit the building envelope for the property. The surrounding lakeshore is unique property feature of the lane and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore creates difficulties which may also apply to properties in the same neighborhood. However, the location of the lake surrounding the building envelop is very unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Granting a lot area,side yard and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the application. The retaining walls in the lakeyard and average lakeshore setback, hardcover for the patio variances facilitate the use of the property for the new home and are necessary for the preservation of the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The variances do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The variances are necessary as the property has considerable practical difficulties affecting development. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 5 of 6 Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit (Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; The grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis;the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property, the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the lakeshore grading. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the lakeshore grading should not impact any public roadways. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. LA19-000049 August 19 2019 Page 6 of 6 Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds applicant is working to improve the site by working within the existing building footprint and massing of the proposed home. The new home is further from the lakeshore compared to the existing home. The applicant is also reducing the overall hardcover of the property. Due to the location of the existing home in the lakeyard, grading will need to be done to remove the existing home and restore the lawn and for the new proposed home. The proposed IUP is reasonable to allow the construction of a new home. Engineer Comments The engineer completed a review of the grading plan and found no issues. A more thorough review will be completed when a building permit is submitted. Public Comments One neighbor has submitted an email in support of the project. It is included as exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances and interim use permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Narrative Exhibit G. Neighbor's Comments Exhibit H. Annotated Survey Exhibit I. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary pplication Date: 06/19/2019 Address: 2605 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0911723420002 Land Use Number: LA19-000049 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: D J Martinson/H M Martinson Address: 18151 Territorial Rd Maple Grove, MN 55369 Name: Peter Eskuche Applicant: Company: Eskuche Design Address: 18318 Mlnnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 peter@eskuche.us Contact Information: Associated Contact: Peter Eskuche peter@eskuche.us Associated Contact: D J Martinson/H M Martinson Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: New Construction Single Family Residence Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision 0 Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: g file:///or-mail/...%20thru/LA19-000049%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20Variance/Land%20Use%20App1ication%20Summary.htm[8/15/2019 4:34:06 PM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000049 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The proposed home & landscaping is reasonable use of this property. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property has two lakeshore setbacks - Lake Minnetonka & French Lake/Creek. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed plan will increase the conformity of the lot. The existing home and landscaping encroach further into the Lake Minnetonka setback. The proposed plan reduces the amount of hardcover of the lot. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: n/a 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Practical difficulties include restrictive allowable buildable area for this unique lot. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: n/a 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: n/a 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: In addition to the typical Lake Minnetonka shoreline, there is a unique secondary shoreline setback due to French Lake/Creek. It restricts the conforming buildable area severely-constricting the 1.86 acre rectangular lot to a 0.13 acre wedge-shaped conforming area. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The typical Lake Minnetonka lot does not have a secondary shoreline setback. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. file:///or-mail/...A19-000049%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20Variance/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form.htm[8/15/2019 4:35:06 PM] Letter View Response: correct 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, orals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: n/a 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: correct file:///or-mail/...A19-000049%20(2605%20North%20Shore%20Dr)%20Variance/Practical%20Diffieulties%20Documentation%20Form.htm[8/15/2019 4:35:06 PM] CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR f. :VVI7 a"or N ea•51 aa^w WV..CO.CY rasa ,.,_--2661oat-N�_ g -11,-1 \E S K U C H E DESIGN GROUP IN GOV'T LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 R \ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA sR • \ HT Df WAY LINES A6 ""` \ - \"SRIHOWN ON R.L.S.N0.1467 \ C \ •• \ ss. N. 3 �� \ • „ � .§? \ T� \ \ I \ \ S'� \ \ O� \ \ %,aa dR \\\ Ivoz \ / � / \N 6 \ s \sw • \ N.a ,� N /// \\ r.E A , \�/ \ .q � l; / / \X \\ �� ' ., /7 • • • i/ / / , li \ • \� \ «ar^... // IjN / / / ,/ Z POND \\''''N // / _"6_sai I oa I wEnAm9 STA.PER a w c..r //..--- /`n^ N \ / • r �/' �i \.,,u -ms l i f\ / ''ql*ithlIllhl /\\\ /' -/./,,,..../\''N.,-' �i� a / , .rl• +— /' I j A� L PROP SED VER MO/rORCOURT • 66• ”„ )I /%'/ ', �,,. V 'PROPOSED 117 ry 'F Y6 () °4. � - i /a3' 0 20 40 80 ------•',%‘. � I ,s9-ze.t tl ♦ ,�r��' HOUSE / / **ow** t\\i W\\v� '\�* ,9\vf #2605(A)`\. // / ^J,' SCALE FEET P a ''Z aT rz•\ . - A4ED A to -__- .. A3� �1e'-‘ :— 1e)P 0,i owl 03 - `` 'b PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (per architect,verify) e. t. 4s1 ,..,,d-65.5,„ \\\.W, z _ % (6)4�� 1)Garage-1939.11 �� \ \ t_(9)\ -a° 2)Top of mandation=IEKESII ��\,\ \\ \°4\\\ _,ya 3)Moin floor ECM = 4)Lower level-(934.61 \�\ l,� ; ao 5)Lower evil storage=1933.5 LAKES \:::; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:(per Certificate of Title No. 1168419) That port of Government Lot 4.Section 9,Township 117•Range 23.decorlbed os follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of sold s tion;thence on a bearing of South M I N N E T 0 N K A (the North line of the Northeast Quarter fsaid section being assumed to have a bearing 1 North 88 degrees 51 minutes West for purposes of this description)a distance of 2878.55 feet;thence South 70 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds Eost a distonce of 838.42 feel;thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 266.25 feet to Point A.said point A being the point of beginning of the property being described and also the beginning of Line A;thence South 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West along said Line A to point on the shore of Loke Minnetonka,and said Line Ae there ending; EAST CRYSTAL BAY said Southeasterly along said snare to a point S 300 feel Southgreed 5 minrly res said Line A, sok,en 300 feet being tired a bearing f South fee degrees OS minutes 30 Lands East from said Line A; e North 32 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 370 feet to o intersection with a line drown South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds host from said Point A:thence North 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West to said Point A.the point of beginning;except that part of said above described property lying Southeasterly of the following described line:Commencing of said Paint A;thence South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 246.74 feet to the point of beginning of the One being descried;thence South 34 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West to the shore of Lake Minnetonka,and said there ending. Subject to flowage easement set forth in decree of which a certified copy is of recard in Boa', 85 of Miscellaneous Records,Page 301 0 the office of the Register Deeds of this County, •. denotes iron marker found APPROXIMATE CUT/FILL AMOUNTS •. denotes Judicial landmor'x CUT= 1020 CYcan sea existing spot elevation,m level datum FILL= 1070 CY 1916.6: denotes proposed spot elevation BRING IN=50 CYa ins eon sea le ---917---. denotes xis[ing contour I vel datum denotes proposed contour line CUT/FILL AMOUNTS IN 0-75' ZONE FROM LAKE AND POND Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. CUT=310 CY This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,and the FILL=650 CY ocotiooofan existing house,to be removed,trees,spot elevations,topography and the proposed location of a proposed house,driveway and grades thereon.It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DltrPROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. _ ���orz� oM N�an K`mai.I 0..d o.svrvey«eep^^und.,n'tn. s-re-19 / CIVIL ENGINNERE,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS Stale 4--s-lo ..®,e.auum,r...o-'5.® t°- °fti evo10- ,•I.9,20. V� 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 Mak S.Cron.,•f1.9nn ...�(ee4C Number 12755 19.7194A 952-473-4141 LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota +X". 1 r �� 't. • CONCEPT DRAWINGS 23 T 2019 ��`. ... aet.+ q:'' a4r'�.; ` { 25 REVISED 2019 ..... .e. 7 ) , .s .. 28 MAT 3019 Mir y, Y 3 MAY 2019 :JUNE 2019 _4 4 �1" ti>r RRFVAR1ANA:NEE:REVIEW ... •• #�tT�� VARSET TT x s � jam. < • /. ,... ! 19 J19 ' 4pr..ns S` .. "'�"�� •; a ,, .r�.�y y;.. '94 .'.. •a°, BEFORE(SOUTHWEST) BEFORE(SOUTHEAST) I • , EC yr,• ... -ti'` �.,."tib .0 � Gt i t' • .. "+'s ... 1.fix. »....d, w lq, , PROPOSED(SOUTHWEST) PROPOSED(SOUTHEAST) esKucHe DESIGN GROUP . . IN GOV'T LOT 4,SEC.9.117-23 L A K E V I E W S HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA • 2605 N.Shore Dr. .•,•, , v.« Orono,Minnesota Cp AI nn RQ *04,7`Sag�3O N�6. ys Hp4. 2✓c 9 �R/aR CONCEPT DRA WINOS 23 MAY 2019 � yREVISED 25IMx 20928 MAY 209dIPNP 30 MAY 2019 • ]JUNE 2019 PRE-VARIANCE REVIEW GOVT /i 1 NE 2019 �`. • ,CGT 4 .;,, � � .•. b //4 /'^ �• 4oz Q \• Y e Qt 1.0 . . . / /1 4/ , ,,s1 ? R ib/ridePV ITEMS IN RED ARE TO BE REMOVED "\7 O t 44' - > ` `, STING N BLUE AREA SHOWS CONFORMING ALLOWABLE FOOTPRINT LAKE , .1117 03 MINNETONKA ''+'",, 0 20 40 60 EAST CRYSTAL BAY SITE CONFORMING esKucHe DESIGN GROUP Copyright 2019 ��' ± ' �• u'�i ,r., LAKEVIEWS • �! i' NORT,y �S3o Hp S7 2605 N.Shore Dr. i "' INK**, _ ,^.......' ' `''`./.--. Sy Orono,Minnesota } .�,Qi 40 - - "" ` =, / Off' .RacRovs % YVF r! CIS fie • I IS 'i.r _ i ,- —'.64 y ` _Allipwv • y Mk `,E - T `\\ f(� ':�I 'Re CONCEPT DRAWINGS REVISED Jhl. �2L11 4i • 4 23 MAT 201, 1. 1�i I V / 05 MAY 2019 VII i 2B MAY 0A f R,`a. i e it O///�R����v0 � •N- !/��' Y. tI TA 4R PRE-VN^v `/ 2:‘ Cf h^ +} L� fr"r i 5 LUNE 2019 ' - �. '! -^':l• .4 yr, :'� _.,, ...�•� `` 1� ,1,A i'.7 iI #�'' P ,. .RR.,�,�,, ).44 1m' VARIANCE SET Y R - - w.m. - • , \� �\ P� e i' 1lR 1f, f IV JUNE 2019 J ..;.._...__.7..r..._=,«.,.___,. / _ qtr* . y•. 044„ .,J i, ,•,••• 4. , ,, „..„.„,, . . . . i h7 -11,..--..,-", t, , • - -- .__ ...4---. -,*„... ' •.... _ `� 417 .',-.,"‘--7-`7 ,s, 4".41. .''..:,,ill.' A ITEMS IN RED ARE TO BE REMOVED ..040114. it y�' a! '4....\�, 4``, •4 -�.i , Nst44:4106, mob.,, R J v driiH7)"11': *- - •''' '- ' 4111*, :' -- ' • LAKE `.'W� ;� r 4' l . P.,, MINNETONKA a ' EAST CRYSTAL BAYIltINit S ` ;;. A"" R � AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK BASED ON ADJACENT HOMES 0 AR Y 'T a. 0 00 40 90 c r 'i "rw ` SITE PLAN *T 5 - �* W/ADJACENT ' HOMES esKucHe DESIGN GROUP CopyrOla 2019 LAKEVIEWS • IN GOV'T LOT 4,SEC.9-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota • CO Rp • • NI. NpRrSs9��o�,OS • h'S Hpli'•• ?os „4/1"..,, �R%1F .\ CONCEPT DRAWINGS t"'.A. 23 MAY 2019 ^r REVISED 25 MAY 2019 u` � 38 MAY 2019 30 MAY 2019 3 JUNE 2019 PRE-VARIANCE REVIEW GO 1„� 5 JUNE 2019 `/ VARIANCE SET ;.Lo� 1!- f 191UNE 2019 f ry I , //� /.40-„,4942,„:. ,j„,,,::-;.---- ..... -Nsimmat,,,—,7--..anky 1 .,N ;• ��i--o� x,14.4 ,4111k , 4', • is riv4 2,- Net4.4,s7 A. .,,1 .44 '''',.„ '-'4i7.1,4 il-I/';ilipWi • ' 'gr.'.,c':44,..,1 ."`”' ' tii,j\ ,1 ' talk 1\mib � Artibl‘if _• ax;: LAKE .ew.m ��� •- 33 111111140,. :4: MINNETONKA 40 60 EAST CRYSTAL BAY \\ D 2® \\ N EXISTING SITE PLAN NNNNNN esKucHe \\ DESIGN GROUP vnbN 2019 3 8 �; a x% woaaaoa �a �� via riViii! i! 13 WV Q o2 VR nn„ .. 2 Z Q J N 99 # f o J Q 0 p Z ^ /21 ,tzz mWf "s / F I a�t r ..,,,,,,07.,,--v �'4- ') ti r 4044, ky, w 41*' ' . .. . .. . t Z 1 9 J T k #s; it a. •t fiE H { 'r Z R4 p'=._' w Alt 4:�Sd. o o a 'a a v r. 3 w i - - ' "' 111f. No a,ss, Z ,Z, v iEs 'oop v��• d U r. 'W o crorr W �. �n a VN Wl$$$g <W ® ,. N `JW 8W Z o r rrv� � • SZ V " ' 4 Z �o o.0 • as, a a)JN \ o „k � Yrx . .� lr � } x, y �S J I r . � t „. w. ... 4,, •. ....„ . . . .. • .. . . o _. . .,, . . ..... 1t W 3 a o g ro. M a = t 3 0 m `` f o fI. 4 III' 9.1 6 Q ,O Z $ O o i[t z le z oz o� `a3 8., wz ,�5 xg wQ i „, =0.,......,,,, ,,,. .J ZO :, i . .. ..., ... ,,,„ �O zo . ,.......,..... . . c,,,,, ,g.,,,, .. . ,.. .. .. ...__... _ . 1 F <,..„ , , ,... .....__ , „, . .. t •� T.�L Za n .T.--..--` . . ...„(4,,,,,:, i Z "1 • ; ' w t1"" isi • lit ..,....,11:,.-4.:x ` ;+ .ii."*.4. , .t. . .. =t o I � F R.iS ur , ..:)4-;(*.'* "z . �, • ;.. • �' • • ,..%•1/4-` j,} ' �C t,,,�< 4. �, y 4...A � , • • rit s, 0. ..' ,. '• ...t • om.: s :,A,4 "•; . l LAKEVIEWS r . .. ''' :; a' 2605 N.Shore Dr. .. N ,� - "' Oro Minnesota Orono, .; : , ,,,,,.,. ' ,...:.... �. - = ..« .,. "31 i v .v ,.xH ....... . .. . .. . *. .. °a^Vis..: .. Fu. -' . , ..,_ ,. . . , „., . . .... ,,,:... .,..,.... .„,. . . , 7. .. ,..,,,,_.,..,r _. _ r .. . . . ,, ....... . . c s ' � 20 MAY 2019 ... JO MAY 2019 t 31UNE 2010 E4 PRE.VARIANCE REVIEW ` k• S JUNE 2019 �" 191UNE�059 4r,.. S..p., ,, .;:i: x 4 w , .'' , ', ,,,,,,„,,,,-,„0- 1,*c-,&', ,',.',.--,i:f',„-,1'.147 '' **;,-- #.7':-.. .:".:7-',„'''',0 c,'''' • „,-,••••:-;...,,,,i'':,..',,::,--,,.-1- It • ' -::. . * , i ,,� *it ..,...•..i., �' � d ,. .fes° GRAVEL TO BE REMOVED '' y�g� ow.�,pd' _ GRAVEL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING LANDSCAPING o Ro AO 60 esKucHe DESIGN GROUP Copyright 2019 LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. Orono,Minnesota CONCEPT DRAWINGS 23 MAY 2019 REVISED 25 MAY 2019 28 MAY 2019 30 MAY 2019 3 JUNE 2019 PREVARIANCE REVIEW S JUNE 2019 VARIANCE SET 19 JUNE 2019 1111 a • pan �R a i.iv,r ,1 r r,o sir LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TYP.CEILING HEIGHT-4'0" APPROX.S.F.=3,672 CRAWL+395 STORAGE v 1 f GRAPHIC SCALE • esKucHe DESIGN GROUP irr, 410 gr pan Copyright 2019 111111 LAKEVIEWS 2605 N.Shore Dr. a I Orono,Minnesota a 1i111. + rr • CONCEPT DRAWINGS 23 MAY 2019 REVISED 25 MAY 2019 38 MAY 2019 00 MAY 2019 3 JUNE 2019 PRE-VARIANCE REVIEW 5 JUNE 2019 VARIANCE SET 19 JUNE 2019 • � b • id� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN • TYP.CEILING HEIGHT=• APPR E X.S.F..4,101 FIN.+843 GARAGE+579 GARAGE+1,975 TERRACE+319 SIDE STOOP+211 COVERED ENTRY • • GRAPHIC SCALE l esKucHe :>.F DESIGN GROUP rwa '(p Copyright 2019 3 x� L 0 i Lu o . ;aw - 'a OF,G (qq+ n<ryQR0 sz Le, a a� rvrvn • .:, 8 Q `O O —I N Va) 0 Ill'ImmIlmll ILeaIV Z J ^ �o-i3 > ()r_< L -it.- U .__I 66 °C LbIIry F __ w x a a u ro I cn 4) L { q{q �n V Lu SZ h O an nnn yr.-.. _� '.7.' 8 O 8 l^O Q .p O l/, J N o } .y il 3 :..�a8«.':� .. 8 ii a d o - 1§v. _° i .- s of ;L ?2 r7 I2 i T a,�,< T 1..,— X11.., Tr _- k. I I E> i >II wow I L � tl 1111 I I ' ;. 1 '�� -.� to 1 I ,. I ,1`111 I ;. ililll� luu ' so . ' 1 , I.. l • ri n�t1t9t.e r.■■n.x I d��t1f-1•'!14r 1 not Ili ; . �( P ,, _ 1",t IIIA I (11 i 71•l ru1+1 P,ri ( ,Hl I Ili -'''it'' - w }, z t 1 ( 1 1 . {111141',111 Igll 3 44i 10 , 1111jIII( ! IIIl . � .•• • I�Itili�IIIi��'1�II11'1110ill ( 111!IlI 0 I@l Zgil AI I •• u 111 I II I r�ul u1�!�ul ligh •t Vi-uINAALUQII i.&Litl..lai1 Z '. IIIII °� ,; it��' . 111 �, : q 11 , �� �� IP IIIII ,_` Mil ,,i • lII,{f11�1 �I�ril�11IIII q• 1 11 y1+1• p+l` 11 11I g1,, !Ili 11 hi h'lili X11" 1 IIIII ,. p lilli1 Ikill �I I ,I high'L hi I Lrtll�(atEI . illllb'I•ll 111 11111111!IIII ?• -11,' I!�II{(I�1�!II11111j�!�II{111j�!'Nil(I' X,:: •II r '(Ir r '(U r 'IU r (1 t 111 {t1.1111�1!I1141�{411411p111 \;I =1101111161q1 iota:z it: i 1 �j, 1 ■ '64i'O'IO 114110 f eilAi 11.h 1 11 1 1I � III1 �19I IIIII :v;; IIII I11il 111j11Ii, Ill I1 i III ells 1111{ 11111'{tii111111{H1frilg{iii ` ilii 1 LAI 41 Alligli 61011011 641104 AI • 6 6 l',, LAKEVIEWS �,�- -=- 2605 N.Shore Dr. r_� �t asrai Orono,Minnesota or _� -.---- 'fi-r ,n'$ u_s.aoa f � . , • F 19 • ,'''''.."='=. � CONCEPTDRA23 MAT WINGS ,o' +. - ! �•�- ,.fa•01'�� ..x•1.1'�.: REVISED —M�S�BFtccs ---77 ✓�._ ® �s�-r-� Y3. _....'mm__ Sa_�J.....� .. -'____ L...ueFlow+ -7' �i � y :- ..� ]5 MAY]019 �! � —,—, >lR�� ���r" Elil dJUNE 2 0119 ��_ Y� '''''':':;?/: ,+' 4 � +'fJ'� Y S PRE-VARIANCE REVIEW ',"��f/ /Y ,�+ rfi -�� S JUNE]019 ' y � ' Y .l VAQIANa SFT 6 �Y� F, f''3� ; Y l Y � 19 JUNE 9019 ✓� f SOUTH ELEVATION(LAKE) -ui.�a�u -'-'-'-'-----------'------------------- f ' twig. . . . .. . WEST ELEVATION(HIDDEN) • �ms=sus"- =i �� :momM ,H LM J F s:i rim xi... -11 Rol .. . .. % .. P. or mo -. i._.-. -.-- C --- % , ��..,.y� .,..�, ,, .,F ...,.�. . �.y__w� �., )�� esKUGHG WEST ELEVATION(CREEK) o DESIGN GROUP GRAPHIC SCALE Copyright 2019 City of Orono %1•10No , Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2 6a 5 /V oR r,// rw�/OR f DA/1' (.7—R o,�vi E) '`'t. .... � Prepared by: Date: y_z S-/ PGRo,vQ FAG f A)J v C/A rt"i, /4vC. 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) MP Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:[STING HARDCOVE In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total uare ( q Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F./8/4,1-(.86 3 8 6$ B DECK C FOuA./TA/w 9 62 S.F. D Q4/!/C/.vri r' *A�F1C4J /j 02 S.F. E Ftiy�f /33 _ AOr WALKS _ /Q, Y77 S.F. F CO,i/C, WA Lk f /77S.F. G AOric 1,4/ALk 4 1TENS 7�2 S.F. H A/C AAPS 9f 2 _ . 1/8 S.F. /$ S.F. I Gv'c0 i41/D GF 65 S.F. J CoA.x, 9R/i)GC - /61 S.F. K SrEPf Li,rr0i.1jr ei 9 S.F. L GEiv.P40,L4.4LL ,11.41/2. $/ S.F. M Coi.C. Fisc P/4c,tAi' 47gAlT11,4ivCf 56'4S6 /t2 S.F. N D/LLAft 7 S.F. 0 a-dery 4,0AneR5 8Y S.F. P Agni i,v/ivF vA LLCS $ S.F. o Tit/IA/cue-IR. ( ,;.cyf'7E - S.F. R S S.F. S.F. S TS.F. U _ V S.F. VV S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover !7, `/36 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(bee City Code Sec 78-1684): P Re-r4/A.,/,‘JG lrvAtrc,y $3 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 83 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover (Subtract line(2)from line(1)] /7,,Y,5'? S.F. (4) Total Lot Area $t, 2 t3 Fx c i.. A/,fi/cA.6 D/2, A.49,z. f /itiCc. Fac,FA.cN citEfR,. >/. 2/3 S.F. Ao.,D Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)) Z/, 3 7 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8of9 City of Orono es.oN\ Hardcover Calculation Worksheet f ,r Property Address: 2 6-05 /V0R TA/ y,q F D Ai✓c (F.S/ -c c ,/F .061/.061/6-4iE1' .v GAouP) `'kEfMO�'t Prepared by: GRaAiB FRG It A1'1'0C/q rE's �a/c. Date: t 7_ _ 7-/(, 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) (Tier 1) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:(pROPOSED HARDCOVEF) In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A „gOk.7E SS1 7 S.F. l3 ,PA/Sf perf f1TEPS 22Y/ S.F. C Dill/F64,4 s, ✓C/ Mo1'oR CouRT 6233 S.F. O ENTRY A1LQt✓Gai+6'Nr'S /y S.F. E !i 1 O ett irPc£ 6,9- S.F. F CPNC'rtcr 8L t Ce !i 16 8 S.F. G RFT" A/1 WALLS 3 a 7 S.F. H COVE-ACP E. riz Y 2 Iz S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M _ S.F. N _ S.F._ O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 7' 7 7 7 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): /4€TA'A.,di G w.40" 727 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 3 2 7 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] /Ey, VSa S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 8/, 2/3 ex c4. N SWALE'f DL.k.O.w /NCf. cL b" K ,2/3 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)) /7, 79% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 Re: 2605 North Shore Drive, Orono, MN Eskuche Design Group Peter Eskuche,AIA 19 June 2019 Variance Application Honorable Plan Commission, City Council Members and City Planner, We appreciate your consideration for the variance request to permit a replacement home at 2605 North Shore Drive. We have worked diligently with our Client and have met with the City Staff to develop this proposal to achieve its highest and best use balancing the client's needs, a cohesive architectural layout, and the city's planning guidelines. We received and listened to the feedback from the city and as a result have made modifications to the drawings to address their concerns. The lakeside setbacks are the primary practical difficulties.We have provided a site plan showing the conforming building area which illustrates clearly how the unusual, irregular shape would create a completely dysfunctional home. In addition, French Creek flows through the property creating an additional shoreline from which to set the house back. This water body occupies a large portion of the Westerly portion of the property. The existing property has a very small amount grass area in which to recreate. The creek divides the property making all of the upland area nearly inaccessible and what area is left is needed for vehicles to access the home. The existing home is almost completely within the lakeshore setback, being less than 28' from the lake at the closest point and only 88'at the furthest point. The current home's floorplan is obsolete with room arrangements and a layout that no longer meets the needs of today's marketplace and the current homeowners. The existing home is a negative eyesore devaluing the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka as well as the neighbors. Our proposal reduces the proposed lakeside encroachment from 27'-10"to over 47' at the closest point of the home's structure. If the average lakeshore setback was considered, the proposed home would be conforming because of the setback of the adjacent homes. Our proposal reduces the massing of the property.We have provided before and after visuals to show that the proposed structure steps back in layers away from the lakeshore, reducing the height and proximity to the lake. Due to the extent of the setbacks,the design of the proposed home is narrower than the existing home by 9'. Our proposal reduces the proposed hardcover by 2903 square feet and is conforming. Our proposal reduces lakeshore hardcover by over 33%. Not including the lakeshore gravel covering,the current landscaping includes well over 9600 s.f. of hardcover within the lakeshore setback. Our proposal was reduced to 6,340 and returns all of the gravel landscape cover to natural grass and plantings. It is unknown whether the existing gravel landscaping has plastic underneath,however it is currently an eyesore and very unnatural. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this application for the proposed replacement structure. From: Melanie Curtis To: Ashley Mehbod Cc: Amir Mehbod;Laura Oakden Subject: RE: Dan&Heidi Martinson Date: Tuesday,July 9,2019 8:00:47 AM Ashley Thank you for reaching out. I enjoyed working with you on your project and appreciate your kind words. I will share your comments with our other Planner, Laura Oakden (copied). We both worked with Mr. Martinson and his team and she will be handling the Martinson application due to our current caseload. Hope all is well! Melanie Melanie Curtis 1952.249.4627 ImcurtisCa)ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. From:Ashley Mehbod [mailto:ashley@pixiedustinc.com] Sent: Monday,July 8, 2019 9:21 PM To: Melanie Curtis Cc:Amir Mehbod Subject: Dan & Heidi Martinson Hi Melanie- I hope this email finds you well. It's been a long time. Amir and I met with Heidi and Dan Martinson over the weekend and we had the chance to review their house plans for 2605 Northshore Drive. We understand that they are seeking a variance to build inside the setback. We signed the form to indicate our support but I also wanted to reach out independently in support of their proposed plans. I told them they are lucky to have you leading the process and guiding them through approvals. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Melanie. Sincerely, Ashley Mehbod 2625 Northshore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 AshleyMehbod l'l\ll rn sr j 612.306.3737 www.pixiedustinc.com to' 10, ncvo4l wall —1 ,N�vV Bvi(din� In I5 ' Ci = ror�It- 1 VI 1C 1 -' NI NON to - 12C� 1_ �N NV(42"/PcLS T. 1, v CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR '' —" go2/0„___, r ESKUCHE DESIGN GROUP 'e..P L.r /' \\ IN GOVT LOT 4, SEC. 9-117-23 # I \\ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \\..1., 4lr 'r -., \ 943111GCe11,l a 1AS 4 j — \sowt a us reg.un \ // I;\\ cot' \\ '�S mob__ -- s Jg \\ c /% \ •,,O led \\\ / ' ,<` '�o e NO \ \\\ TktS <S1 \\\ ti", \\ ko��, \\ �\ ,' / \\\ �jv�, .?I )> \� GUI// T y Axl\\ \OIllitedo tet / \ N. } • i , \ 4,; \\ "://i f \ / / ' \ �.. \ / / • :3 Vii%/V or \ ----.N.. \\ (G)�' t0 3h i -----____ \•\ i �/ l 1 - N \i �i ISI •, I ;% . \� '. i �/ / , 1 11 i /'/�►' iii\`�� - II -7s �Ff If Nit ® . . , J Jik, ..11 1 9AK AWa N�Ra6�.A 7 t ,1 • loneof ryil �F 444se:%. • • illibi 0 20 40 So i deli 0 kk\t It `$•bt f 41:. .. SE 1 / +T wKMIMr .i i ll•i 4 v rl ,.. t "p SCALE N FEET ,,\. \ r\ )• 4.----4---....75/ PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (Per vNiloct,wrifY) argot <\ �'\ J 1)CoraP \ �� „ Top of foundation r 10 ...4`. 3)Nan floor r EMU \ ` 4)Lower level w 139111 ` ,, 5)Lower level*forage r En --S.....„......, � w ; LEON.OESCRPTION OF PROPERTY:(per Certificate el Tial No.1166415) .FST' Pet Part of 0oprrnent Lot a,Spoon q TorSvp 117.Rage 23.dssa8ed es tabes: EMINITONKA €�6.� tmisrtes ie t far bra a'o g 267555 feet thence South 70 dev, 37 minas Si .cords East a*.tone.of 63642 feel:theme South 67 degrees 19 neuterpe2p3Yy�seconds Earl a distance of 26615 test to - Point A.said point"ekes the pont el f the property baba deo 7Yed and alp the beg:eng of Lie A;thence South 32 degas 16 minutes 30 seconds West along .aid Lir A to a pont on the eras of Leko limsts,*y end said tine A there endagi EAST CRYSTAL BAY 'rune'0 feet ° said ahae to a point 300 feel decree 05 rtyne .pm pip Ler A. eaA 300 feet heng meoPred m o Dea+q of South 39 degep 0.S muutp JO.monde East from sad Lie A:theme North 32 degrees 16 minutes3a0 emends East Seance of Coot7krnasaid Point t to an intersection Ai South 59 ergots thence North dawnsn d 05 miute 30 ode West to said gas Point A,the point of begirrmq;..upt that pat of said above ds aA.d propely lying Southeasterly of the folowba 0eecr404 line:Cornmencire at said Point At trorus South 59 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds Cost a Astro,.• Wesel to of the she ire 10.1 desolate;Lofts Nemo.d said Southh 34fdeere 4 4s 541 minutes 30 aponto No point f m 65 et eltrimeoo.Records.Peagerf 3011 M 1 0 aRlu offs the Rp1.1.1 Dads of otnheCaunty 6004 e: denotes bon maker found APPRO%6NTE CUT/FILL AMOUNTS 6: donates Jodoiat ladrn0rk CUT r 1020 CY Noe.p): denotes*041119 spot elevation.mem.m level datum Fu.•1070 CY MI: donates proposed spot ernatlon 613!0 N•50 CY _--917---: denotes existing contour fns.rum sea IevS Down • —{{_—: denotes propped contour Ca CUT/FU-AMOUNTS N 0-73' ZONE FROM LAKE ANO POa3 Borings shown ore based moon Cl oeuned*stun, CUT.310 CY Tie intends to.hew the boudaiee f N.move*panes poprta,and the Fan-650 CY location of wasting hop.,to D.removed,tree.,spat treaters.tw06,pot,and the prwa.ed#011,al proposed house,triveway d grade.Mann.1l doss not Purport to Naw any other enprov.ments or sncroochmenta aaa I PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.paa by es, r a sd nor C...a 0100. m. a epee art 1 m e ,Lk. *LOU Svvmr uerr or a-M111 !Ova 445 1109111 6.LAND 60RY0Y066,LAND PLANNR5 M e+Sou.e t - NORTH WLLOW OWE LONG LANE.IP 55356 ... ...our use rr...r.e ave./ 1—r r Usk S 5vaena Mamela thaw resew,2155 2-1NA 952-47]-4141 RUN DATE:06/20/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 09-117-23 13 0007 38 09-117-23 42 0007 THOMAS J ABOOD REV TRUST J A WALKER&S S WALKER 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 THOMAS J ABOOD JAMES A&SHARON S WALKER 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 2685 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 09-117-23 13 0009 K H HODDER&J B HODDER 2640 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 KENT H&JUDITH B HODDER 2640 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 14 0007 SPOTTED DOG LLC 1130 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 SPOTTED DOG LLC 1907 E WAYZATA BLVD #300 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 41 0003 CR BERGQUIST III/AE VANORDEN 2545 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 CARL R BERGQUIST ABIGAIL E VANORDEN 2545 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 41 0004 JEFFREY LINN ANDRADE 2565 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JEFFREY LINN ANDRADE 2565 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0001 JAMES VAN RIEMSDYK REV TRUST 2655 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES VAN RIEMSDYK 2655 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0002 D J MARTINSON/H M MARTINSON 2605 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL JOSEPH MARTINSON HEIDI MARIE MARTINSON 18151 TERRITORIAL RD MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 38 09-117-23 42 0003 AMIR A&ASHLEY K MEHBOD 2625 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 AMIR A&ASHLEY K MEHBOD 2625 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0004 J A WALKER&S S WALKER 2685 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES A&SHARON S WALKER 2685 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 42 0005 J M WHISLER&S S WHISLER 2683 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 JAMES M WHISLER SANDRA S WHISLER 2683 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate 8' Notify Map P Date: 6/20/2019 12i� 0 2640 51 Ntrth-‘144t0)4 ,.... S4 ar, es - 2655 Q1 4'o 2605 fh �EShO4 19* 2625 `7' Ot 2 565 2545 / 2.15 24E Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I ( i ( I ( i ( I 2605 North Shore Dnve This data (i) a furnahed AS' IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnishedwithnowarranty ofany knd; and (ii) is notsuitable far legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shat not beliadefor anydamage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin C.untyGlS Office 300 6th S treet South,Minn ea pd s,M N 55487/g s.i nfo@hennepi n.us Date Application Received: 07/17/19 O�T Date Application Considered as Complete:07/17/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/15/19 y To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members et Dustin Rief, City Administrator q&ESHO0` From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: #LA19-000054,John Kraemer&Sons o/b/o OCBR 1 LLC, 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd S Public Hearing: IUP—Export 500+cubic yards of material Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an interim use permit to export approximately 3,200 cubic yards of material in conjunction with construction of a new residence. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background A new home is being built at 855 Old Crystal Bay Road South.The project will involve the export of approximately 3,200 cubic yards of material from the site to accommodate the proposed home; an interim use permit(IUP) is required. The export of the material is what triggers the IUP. From the site,the haul route proposed by the applicant is: north on Old Crystal Bay Road S to County Rd 112;then west on County Rd 112/Highway 12 to Maple Plain. Note,the property and adjacent properties are undergoing a boundary line adjustment not yet reflected in the Hennepin County online information. Exhibit B illustrates the approved lot orientations. "Parcel 2" is the subject property. Section 78-330-Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 107,576 s.f.± (2.4 acre) ±299' Applicable Regulations: Interim Use Permit (Code Section 78-1726(a)(6)) The construction of the new home will result in 3,200 cubic yards of unneeded material.The applicant proposes to export this from the site out of the city. It is currently being stockpiled on site (see Exhibit C).The proposed home will not be out of character with the neighborhood. FILE#LA19-000054 19 August 2019 Page 2 of 3 Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit(Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; the proposed grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading and export of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed material removals will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use,the grades,or enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However,activity of exporting approximately 3,200 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise,dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the builder and owner will be responsible for keeping debris off of the roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the MCWD,the City Engineer,and building inspectors so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city, which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. FILE#LA19-000054 19 August 2019 Page 3 of 3 Interim Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the proposed plan conforms to the standards of IUP review. The material removal activity will be tied to the building permit for the new residence. Engineer Comments The City Engineer will review the revised grading plan for conformance. Public Comments No public comments have been received regarding the IUP.The Little Orchard HOA has approved the property owners' request to connect a driveway from the subject property to Little Orchard Way. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the IUP, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose additional conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested IUP? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval with the IUP to export approximately 3,200 cubic yards of material in accordance with the City Engineer's requirements associated with the overall building permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Site Plan Exhibit D. Haul Route Exhibit E. MCWD Permit Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map References • 2040 Community Management Plan Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/17/2019 Address: 855 Old Crystal Bay RD S Wayzata, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0911723210015 Land Use Number: LA19-000054 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: OCBR 1 LLC Address:Attn: Rita Schepers 4567 American Blvd W Bloomington, MN 55437 Applicant: Name: John Kraemer Company: John Kraemer& Sons Address: 4906 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55436 john@jkandsons.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Charlie Simmons charlie@charlieandcodesign.com Associated Contact: Anthon Ellis anthon@charlieandcodesign.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Interim Use Permit(IUP) for Export of materials 501 cy or more Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: ���` pea[ a 52® E 51 27,::7 i ,s Z ir via // vV { - 0.U0. 63 / / �. / // ,, ,-...,4,-----.-.__--——-TT ---.":----.,. -,.,Z,Mr,27:-.:!.-7. , I :n, —,,,-, ; )9' °P0 - ,,„, s”` /' % -r.-_,___L__---\\ _ -/ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR d n SCOTT & STACI RICHARDSON AND -_-/- ';- Vii- 7: / r , - I ' • �'_�-- r-'-_ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO. ,% r R- I ' �v / IN GOV'T LOT 7, SEC. 9-117-23 AND OF LOT 3, w 9 %/ —f '// I I i I I I� // ��� 1 .7-----,,PARCEL-3, `� �,—/ BLOCK 1, LITTLE ORCHARD z `'" / -" I I I III /� ` \ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 04 HOPSE• / // / /�\/ / ///,,,,//2 / / // / i j\`'...N, \\� A"." R 5 g.r.CN\RD WAY I y,.„.,\L.c.)--1-,‘, :.-?), ,, �'°'Y Ex STNG LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: V Er"m, I I / -i�� /%/ iii / g f \�__ (VACANT) '"""-.1".\----/ 2 Lot 3 f6,ock,.LITTLE ORCHARD. I , /i////i/ °ll l r I I 1 \ / Parcel 1: aee... ]in Cie do s e2ew s,rP Principal Meridian, 1 1117§vR i/ \ / / l '° I (ll,\\!���� •\ / / eia :,a L wMimoeS liio,s2 ebbo3smgtn "^Ix71ga rE les I ��_ __�I //// // / / i % I I ]o I 1 \Y \\�\" \ I 57 minutes seconds 3 thence 14 South oo e _ 29 seconds West.596.73 feet:thence ! ,taus. I V I (//' ( l / 1 / i f 777 '\ J -3 Mtn4 a nit (r_._/,,, / \ I li l i f / ((\ 1 s7,`.eo',00 minutes n19, ny .tn i0 SMIEL _ \ \ l r /1 I I „ 1 sae , 1 / /\.\ 1 .Po,u \a\ \ • / S ne Ee, 0 G 6 from point 5 uw a beim,he e- '\ \ \ 1 1 / r I ' \\ I / '\f_--,,,.../--• i -" / \I .\1 I �we / ,,,', inolter referred to and t het e N r 9- South e12e X54 1\\ \ \\ \Y \ `\ / // / \ I I\I`�s%�\ \ >L'�:!0_,..--,-":„-')/ >� i� �\ DV PROPOSED �'� n'w.n "'.p�/ m� sles 40 secords West ecoms o,t]66]designated Ent of b thence M.sfrom ae bbeginning;dcabas e"Lme Y. s VAA VA\\A / i �\ \\ < v +_ �� �e _ ALf€ // / Dn(o1 t 23 west Cf nmutes to U ` \ \ / / / \,i'--'' \ ` I' '' ''.\'''''''''/:-----1:-/ • �/_-- \ I I A / Sou th line.�\\1 1\\\ \\� \\ A\\ \ 11( \ \I\ee.=� S \\/\\`�, - �� �, \ _ x 1� I"-s°LL.e c. / In)T ,...°,...... �v 9slees under the Last UJ , 1i v0.'",.."'..---7 �:JCharbs Noon Yeti,et al as °Will ane tofCh o .U.\ 1\\\ \\\V ,I 1 1\\V 1 AV A A \\‘‘\\\._.. A �\ ` \/---_/--.__ / I p.v...,„,_,.- i , • p / A`.' r- MbYee,deceased.and said Carpenters, = oeee of Hennepin County, Novembere,oD a \ \ \ \ \\\„\‘ ‘,‘ �� '-_ �/ K / Y 93 D 45 of Po9ee 93 oM \\\ \\\\\ \\ - \\ F.°,s„ \�1\''. /> I "'I -+-`. J; r,,(�, (c)Line X and Line6.sae the Wee Carpentn,°vy 1 the property conveyed r said Trustees'Deed of \\\ \ \\\�r\ \ -� _._-_..Is]� 'n Section o f ioensinpml \ 4 \ \ �-s �.i,E1 -_ /+�� � -1 d ` 2 Lot ]302.61 feetSouth o the North Principal \.,\A\\ \ \ \\ \\ '\1`� "'-^F'�����\b / � -.-T 1 Y..' \ o� a 03 minutes 14 eWestW41.75 fe . `. \ W alto of th aal recn `` \ \ \ \\\ \'\ \ \. �� - -- p, h 5 55 053 a South t 2294/ est.theSofeet uth e1 degrees ` \3.28^.AY),EXIT�INC' - - AY ti _� f / e5 s degreesSouth eindegrees tAhe \ \ \ \� \\y\ \� \\ y� T _ I _96gp_ l \,/7 : 08 'nth t26 degrees 4e 556 I more •,.,,,,''',,'..,`,‘*'•\\\ \\\\\• ‘‘‘‘‘S \\\\\.\ `{.0'}�AC.'PROPO ED �A\ _ ...I o� Is \ \ �� � � L� / Boy,eeke M thence see spurn ''‘‘‘'‘‘\ v vy Vw‘.\,\\ /:� } "LITTLE a seconds e w beginning. t 9 Me R .n aa�,Eat to f�poep pot p \\ _ ® '4200 ORCHARD n the Eat ne of sod Government Lot],assume2 to " ` \ e<o do mh ne • \ \�\ \ ` �Y�� EL`2 WAY O, `'‘‘'\.`‘',\\N::::'\\ \\\\x �\ \ 3.'19' A.EXISTING / '( ✓ io°Yeoaum denotes ex., denotes isting mmspoker elevators mem leo eve doter, 7/ 4hG ` d, teA �;,a'tmh°` -7- /-8461'`A\\fROPOSEDI'-, 'N n/J�- repast. n9 t \\\ Aer\.s�\ \ • .\\ T % .� �� I \‘,..> ..0 Y. .eo• ..te,buying contour e datumo0 d t p t F o \ `1'• \ V\ • \ \''`i: /-'�r ��\ \ Y _ �1 co.,, Ec:]: denotes bearings based on legal o no< o,.,� '\'''‘. vim\ P.' vyv �` ` v vv ��/ - t4c 2 I U °' , a v \ 1A 'i existing m9 �VI �� \ \ T �. Commitment 00 01040-22674 a/.2 222 29.2019 p. °ted Ste p,t R,e Gpmpon; a vfib PROPOSED LEGAL cescfwT S. r V 9\ ----"X' '.1' R se 1 \\ \ ®\\� �\ _ - N i of GCvernnent Lo 'n Secl on 9 io. 23 W o,the 5l', -pn ttt s,°,n of `\�I�// d462hh< Epat',ro GOoverrmeenl Lo 11]•0 No�Uwe>1 co of J r0b<k�° iTL 1 ,, \ \,t '\ ?"" 95.69 I ]t aea 3 p/,2]591r 9' °,72 d pE,. � - \.' - o• f]6 l ,oli hf52 of Le,n0 I �>y 30 < degrees � '°sss°i , �sfs��`� m.sat on '�%,p>,,.', <44,..7',0„. "- .,CV A � �/ with 9 n. ,22 m 3wet from the thence Nor. 22 0 34 seconds is �o the po t of beginning. NA / I` `��l<d`vV . v.. \:,,,,/i'__'-',.\ --'-------- ver 1 description the Block line of doe Governmem Lot]'s assumed to be°oe North and South line. 'c '''V'77,�1-----_, ,,,,:-.-.--,.6----_._AAi � LOE vPorcel 2, Those rts of Lot]'n sections ]Ran 23 W he 5th p ,Block, LITTLE ORCHARD d ' eAr a]-]xo'"YmLL(s1 \0 ?\II \ ,'� \ - l0 vuff[L<i-,dx of he Norah he East a said of al c]dace Block t till E ORC 1 \ !\ = a greet set le South co .95.1eB69 ped 62e e.,,e.e 30 montes 30 seconds Government 35.11 feet being deet' g i South 7Odegre degrees 30 minutes 30 8 ss 2'2 minutes 34,° w s Boy,Lake Minnetonka: N\\ �\ '''`P.4,,,./P:','"...,.,_-_--=-7== —7-:-.--- bearing South 6.6 Ds with the East West being sod lost deur,.course 9 ',,,, I Nnated os ii I "t5,. ./...... ..SR, w'v \ Linen%ap.e• opont of ] 1desi49 TI 54 ern horn a eE ( ,y 'grin 3 6' Southwest tence I istance of &00 5 deg 9 � i LAKE � �°''w Vie I €North bead ISI I1 '� \� Sept'mro « g K e a eat Office a y De boundary I t property County,conveyed Trustees. ep September 26 ,9]9 to said 293p Dors me se now a port of the e . ao\ �4• (e) West line a the plot of portion of LITTLE ORCHARD. iera�aNovember 10.1938. Pa MINNETONKA DRG „ IgAf \ - ,r,1°.1,„:,, al ee L 3r Bot'jewn;eel 049at minutes ORCHARD oie a 30261 f West of the North line 462 feet West o he E°,,Range 23 West of 1°Ii d Gbeing.69 I 5.Principal kleridion.which lie eosterly of the ehW v w Q �f' R.';;':, l mid Lot 3; h lam d South Me)a ...- corner a thence 5G ] e 1ma Dotho< a is n m ] inure,30 seconds Wesi a MAXWELL BAY gg feet di,tmaep°th pt .nt Y e meanie Saute line,from the erne,of Lot 3. seconds. (assuming ]5.1,fa4.°thence a , s.Oo f East. aaa'ip,°g; et south�,Y`° ,era, ,trace of,] e,: 5.ep,ea 19 minora 53,aped,wet a d,tm<.of p a pant pn � a _ E----LM PARALLEL wrtH EAST ane sale Zine mere meing. r ' mm.nv �\ r Lwc Op cav i LOi] 999 x e. 1s-036C obi' . . <� f Etta �6 �f _ _:.�.„o:,`=_ - 11,11 2i ie"` � 3 °� a 3 ``i'�g E g�a 3JN]GIS321 JF8 ll3MXbW Q I.] 31iii .1 '' , s p q �'p qq o —IT ,., =1 jp AFF eaf ii a'.f ., ex., 7 ,i�1 3 i -. 7- 1 ' / —'-' i• '� '- te 1 j QOa.. ;'..':.5 -.:. a .. moi --�--_._ - _____-__-__-__-_ _-_- �_ _rlJ._�__�-__--- ,.,..,,,, ,:, /,,le::.,, ,, ,,,,,, ..., ,..,/,,k i 8 -- ,..„.,,.. ..n... ;i - I *. = I w tl.. I 10 1.., t 11 S TA 3 1 W. -414?*--.6,''' , At`'i,-*:,41,',/,. ,,/.f, / /-n \ \\ W --'1 y. .. 'fir 8 Ati .,, ,,„ „. ,---,„, z 1 \._*, _. . _ ,,,,4k,..,--,---___,„-,- ,-,/,..„------,r,„___„.:', ...zr..... ,- 4. 4,:*:-:_.-._,..14,„___:__*r, ,„,.,,, 4.: .,. ,..........,„..„.„77.,_:,: ,,._ ,,,, , ,-.. ,, ,..,,, ,,,‘ ,,..„„,g,4.., __„_,.,_ ..u5-,v_ 417...._..._ ..__.-„p: ----- *, *i„,,,,,,,y,,,, ,,,,„ N,„,, w ,„,,,i,,,,, lc., ..._, r. ,. 1,,.7.. 1..4.,-T,„ \ .A,t:.,„ ...: .,-,.___ 6, ,., 7 "- k-4 ,y,L `.p' r,;•y l 4 + / aft��, [J `� 1 -, �4 ' 7 Ar= .-_-t34--1..._,:::.:::.z.:.,,,,.:":',,,,,sic,:::::._:::::,:.:-...,....,:..,,,i,,':,,,,,..:.._ -..::/,,,_,,i_7,:_:,.","'_:_.,_,‘",',,(:::„').:::„/ ,,,;1... / i____,,, '--- _______-- ..,j_-:,-,-::: -'S'4_::-, k4int„: : -7,-,--_,--___-_' --l'a:_71Zi7..--.:-.*--::::<'' 'ire4, ----...._........... "---,_,,,,,,,....„------ ____ .,,, 0 198 InktS.oRE \ a \ ]W 5 Haul Route for 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd Project North on Old Crystal bay rd s to State highway 12. West on highway 12 to Maple Plain. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER -r QUALITY OF LIFE Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D, and on the basis of statements and information contained in the permit application, correspondence, plans, maps, and all other supporting data submitted by the applicant, and made a part hereof by reference, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED to the applicant named below for use and development of land in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Issued to: Scott& Staci Richardson Permit No: 19-300 Location: 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd S, Orono Purpose: Erosion Control—Single Family Home Date of Issuance: 6/26/2019 Date of Expiration: 6/26/2020 By Order of the Boa of Managers Will Roach Permitting Assistant This permit is not transferable without District approval, and is valid to the date of expiration. No activity is authorized beyond the expiration date. If the permittee requires more time to complete the project, an application for renewal of the permit must be received by the District at least 30 days before expiration. The applicant is responsible for compliance with all District Rules and for the action of their representatives, contractors, and employees. Conditions: Project to be completed as described in plans submitted to the MCWD office on June 17th, 2019 according to the provisions of this permit. • Properly install and maintain all required erosion control measures until the disturbed areas are re-stabilized • Notify MCWD in writing upon completing installation of perimeter and sedimentation controls • When the site is re-stabilized and the MCWD staff has performed a final inspection, all perimeter control must be removed (Statement concerning fees for inspections, violations, etc... on following page) We collaborate with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water for current and future generations. 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard,Minnetonka,MN 55345 • (952)471-0590 • Fax:(952)471-0682 • www.minnehahacreek.org MINNEHAHA CREEK r WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE Inspection/Analysis/Monitoring Fees A site inspection and monitoring by District staff will be performed where the activity involves: • a commercial/industrial/multi-family residential development • a single family residential development greater than 5 acres or of any size if within the Minnehaha Creek subwatershed • any alteration of a floodplain or wetland • dredging within the beds, banks or shores of any protected water or wetland • a violation • any project which in the judgment of the District staff should be inspected due to project location, scope, or construction techniques In these cases, the applicant shall pay to the District a fee equal to the actual costs of field inspection of the work, including investigation of the area affected by the work, analysis of the work, and any subsequent monitoring of the work, which in the case of a violation shall be at least $35. Standard Fee Schedule District professional staff $ 65.51* District interns $ 40.35* District clerical staff $ 46.69* Consulting Senior Engineer $ contracted rate Consulting Engineer/Technician $ contracted rate District Counsel $ contracted rate Application fee $ 10.00 Copy costs $ .25 + actual staff time Color copy costs $ 1.00 + actual staff time * Hourly We collaborate with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water for current and future generations. 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard,Minnetonka,MN 55345 • (952)471-0590 • Fax:(952)471-0682 • www.minnehahacreek.org MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE MEMORANDUM TO: Anthon Ellis,Charlie&Co Design FROM: Grace Barlow,Minnehaha Creek Watershed District DATE: July 9th,2019 RE: MCWD Permit#19-300, Stockpile Clarification This memo is to clarify and approve that Charlie and Co Design have reached out to MCWD in regards to stockpiling excavated dirt at their 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd S project site in Orono. Charlie and Co Design plan on storing the dirt on site for two months before removing it-this was not initially outlined in permit #19-300. They have clarified with the District that perimeter erosion control will be installed around the stockpile and that it will be stabilized with erosion control blankets. This adheres to the District's Erosion Control rules. RUN DATE:07/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 04-117-23 34 0015 38 09-117-23 21 0017 JUDSON M DAYTON ETAL TRSTEES KOOLWUNDA LLC 38 ADDRESS PENDING 799 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 JUDSON M DAYTON KOOLWUNDA LLC 121 8TH ST S #860 640 LOCUST HILLS DR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 21 0007 38 09-117-23 21 0018 JAY R SWENSON JUDSON M DAYTON ETAL TRSTEES 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JAY R SWENSON JUDSON M DAYTON 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 121 8TH ST S #860 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 38 09-117-23 21 0008 W R LANGTON&M K LANGTON 2870 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM R LANGTON MICHELLE K LANGTON 2870 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 21 0009 OCBR 1 LLC 2885 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55391 OCBR 1 LLC ATTN RITA SCHEPERS 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 38 09-117-23 21 0010 MARY L HOLMES 2865 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55391 MARY L HOLMES 2865 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 21 0011 S S BERGERSON&A BERGERSON 2845 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55391 SHAWN S BERGERSON 2845 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 21 0012 TONKAHOME HOLDINGS LLC 2825 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55391 DAVID W SCHWARTZ 115 PASTURES LA NEW CANAAN CT 06840 38 09-117-23 21 0013 LITTLE ORCHARD HMNRS ASSN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 DAVID W SCHWARTZ 115 PASTURES LANE NEW CANAAN CT 06840-4342 38 09-117-23 21 0015 OCBR 1 LLC 855 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 OCBR I LLC 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 38 09-117-23 21 0016 OCBR 2 LLC 845 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55391 OCBR 2 LLC 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/18/2019 2943 621 i99 825 R x; 124 L' 4t Q 2885 85 g, 2870 x ix. 845 87 2850 at . ‘1 2865 <"T' r (i .�'� 2805 7 2845 ml 2 825 r.'2I \\ 2865 Buffer Size: 500 o 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I i ( I t i i I 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd S This data a furnshed 'AS IS' with no () epresentantY as to completeness or accuracy, (i)is furnshedwithnowarranty of any knd, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering a surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not beliadefaanydamage,injury a loss resulting from Ws data. For more information,contact Hennepin Coun[yGIS Office 300 6th Street So uth,M nn ea po s,M N 55487/g si nfo@hennepi nus Date Application Received: 07/17/2019 O�T Date Application Considered as Complete:07/24/2019 ' VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/15/2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members yet c,•• Dustin Rief, City Administrator -1kESHO��` From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: #LA19-000055, Hendel Homes—Molly Zwettler, 3345 Fox Street Public Hearing: IUP—Export 500+ cubic yards of material Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an after the fact interim use permit for exporting approximately 1260- 1400 cubic yards of material while constructing a new residence. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background A new home was built at 3345 Fox with an approved building permit. An as-built survey was submitted at the end of the project with new grading patterns located on the lot. The builder identified roughly 90-100 trucks or 1260- 1400 cubic yards of excess soil was hauled off site. Each truck averaged 14 yards per load. An interim use permit (IUP) is required or hauling over 500 cubic yards of materials to or from a site. Section 78-330-Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 203,535 s.f.± (4.67 acre) ±225 Applicable Regulations: Interim Use Permit (Code Section 78-1726(a)(6)) The applicant imported specific materials for back filling, patios and the driveway and exported excess clay soil. The new grading of the lot resulted an excess of 500 cubic yards of material being hauled from the site.The material was hauled out of the city. The proposed home is not out of character with the neighborhood. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit (Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend approval and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; The grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. FILE#LA19-000040 17 June 2019 Page 2 of 3 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading and export of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the grading activity was conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the material removals will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use,the grades,or enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of materials. However, activity of exporting approximately the proposed amount of material and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the construction of the proposed home may have resulted in additional noise, dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the builder and owner will be responsible for keeping debris off of the roadways. Do complaints were brought to the city's attention regarding this project while it was under construction. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey was submitted for the new home. At that time it was identified that additional grading took place on the property requiring the need for an after the fact IUP. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The applicant has already completed the hauling and the new home on the property. Interim Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the plans would have conformed to the standards of IUP review if it was processed before the work took place. The material removal activity took place while the new home was under construction. Denial of the IUP would require the import of the exported material,resulting in additional truck traffic. Engineer Comments As this is after the fact, I have no opportunity to approve a haul route. As a matter of practice we ask that heavy trucks minimize their time on city streets by getting to county and state roads by the most direct route possible and then not use city roads as cut through. FILE#LA19-000040 17 June 2019 Page 3 of 3 Public Comments No public comments were received for this public hearing. No complaint were made to city hall regarding this project at the time of construction and hauling of material. Issues for Consideration 1. If the IUP was submitted before the work was done, does the project meet the IUP standards? 2. Since the work is completed are there other concerns to consider? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the after the fact IUP. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Proposed and As-built Survey Exhibit C. Haul Route Exhibit D. Narrative Exhibit E. Cut and Fill Drawing and Calcs Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/17/2019 Address: 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0511723440007 Land Use Number: LA19-000055 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: MARCELLINUS HERMANUS M SMITS Address: VIRGINIA ELENA PEREZ 5504 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA, MN 55424 Applicant: Name: Molly Zwettler Company: Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata,MN 55391 molly@hendelhomes.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Soil Export Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision 0 Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application Subdivision Application ❑ Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: file:///or-mail/...000091%20thru/LA19-000055%20(3345%20Fox%20Street)%20IUP/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(1).htm[8/15/2019 3:29:05 PM] ,etv-ece-es6 95f GS NM 3.1 ON01 3A.0 M0111M HILION acv-Ll 509 SilaliNIVIcl ONIM'S11013Agf1S aNYI'SHaNNION3 11AM [175.-5 .1',1-.PL.....^,^S P.1P=14T,S.'"Nil IN °''''''' ..........-....... “-.... 'DNI 'SHIVIDOSSV 28 DH2EINOHD 1031'0d ----...„.....--- .._.„. — „--- -/ .- -•- • ,'' .1- - - -- ,-,- "am , ' ,/ / _ ,--- 1 • „ / / 1 , / i ;a•--7/-, --/ / ,,,,„ i ,,, ,, --7/, .: '-,,,c,,,,, --. , ,,,, ,....- . ___ , / ii lit , ,,,, c6,,,,__ ___ ,..t.., Es 1.__.- ''''' __ , i 4, \ i A\ 1 , _ <4 „ --i 1 - \ ,./ ,\\ --- /' _____,_.-_-1- 1,,,,,• ,,,•" / / X // ,‘, ‘ • \. -''/ 0),,oj-, -. „,t,0_• ; -,,_ D - ,7, ',, \-, % •.... ''., •:, '”-.14-1-- - `, -------1----1--'°- -------=----_---------i----,1 ---1 ' "6 4.111 ' • ,,,b, - Zt;, ,I aillite**„.. . ''''' -'-----• , -- ---;--„---,_.,,,---r---:----------,-_:-„,-,Igt I ----I-- I' ithr.....,, ,_ --... -...,,S• • '', , -,4 - ---- ---"` ....„, ,--- ,„„,----.< Z ,.., -- - J--- / --•,,'' ) ' ' ' • Cl)E. ,-•-,,,,'I,-- ,_-,..,- --/-,, /--,+" / , , L 2 L.:,) CN o - 7 ,-,- -1 ,/,>" i /: . „ z / I E H ›-' t..1 ' '- " 1-"-I '-' - in\l/' -4 rx w ----, g -.,. .t. 11 -1 - ' - 1 cn ,- >_, // ii __t_ 4 N./,, i, /i gi k/.../) / 1-‘,/1 1 ,.,1/ /y;71' ,, N3, • ill 11 ii .) -T-, E --T1-• . - •_-_,-vs, , ' -,--- - .w __I---- 0 , 7-- - •„. /g', , z, ., 1.' 2 -t, z -7cl 2....., cn E.,r.1 - /I, 1 ,i ; 1,4,,41III i F2;48 g .2°°3 I ,,i/ F4 9 „ i , ,1 ,- k .474. , 2.4,“ I- E g .° :t C, ',.:- r L7 •Xv.I; Pf # .' , , g i ..,,,-,.? „,- ,,,,, I - -- ..,/ 4 • A l',.1 I.______ ? ? F 2.' F g --a° ,,,t , '11''''''',A, 1\ 't'.-L------ 7z/j'r 1 Ctj 1 1 1 ,`- , iii Piio„%Ve:"b 1 ; . '6- t t t t ‘.^, ; 21'112 ',-L-3`; _A 3 ---, - 1 ,...3 P, 1 . . `‘^`` , _ ,." ---e?i ..„to.b....- \'..,,' '' "-- Fi , ,it, ,-_, _,,,,,,, _______ • ,,-.,-.‘,,,\-..,, .A.--iii....‘;-.. ;Tr,• >_._i - LL, 3 -,' .•J, . lg-N, -----""--,%et.% ,11‘4,t \‘.... \hip ___....„-....0 ki,'.‘t.,, '-'1 ' "-: --'1,4- '-' is i 1- '--- ---- Nm CI-- ''.' -,.,.:,eir keig , - --P--.,-,i,,,, ., -,N-- " "' ----..-,,•-.,- "0 -, -5,11 .7.-/• • - '_ .F,' 1,,, a) --_ ,., .,,,, ... •,...:24.1,_ •---,_,..2is --,,,t,_,- ..,-._,_____ O !17-------411k 2- ------..k.' L. "S•1 ,-'''-:',----- ,.., , .., r 4-- • '-,::-',--- 5J ii 1 „ .71-' 0 0_ §._ :, Z ' '-, P`4 \' ,'' p Y2E8- g- jok- H, >" , 'N," W 0:1 Zn N Z XI N 0-4 Pq N ' W .. \ ,T, Itl1-CLt-Z. SL p91 SSLLI+.P.^N a.wal3.o,...s VI + n sA+ofl 9SLSS NII'3NYl 0N01 3AINO M0l'fM Hll10N Stt ,•I r �/,,OO'/� SN.NNY'Id W.'SNOAnna.6 ONY'I'SNSNNIONS MAID [1-OL-S +' l vepn�o R,w I l4 -ONI 'S3,LVIOOSSV 7R DNaHNO2iO lo3road 7; :"++ tiM° 2,I,+==7,9 v I SWIM y "`"`"m uro / \ ' / lIl l i I / / $ I I i•1 1 lI \ isso tt / I / // e9, 1 I 8d: Iti i<tiL x ./ %°ss / -d' / 1 °I/ I / >-� � `), / / II ��, , X ' / . ,1 / / , , �. / 1 F /'� i o \g`a\ !) I \•L� • Is 1/ �i ttIPis/ 1�\i� •\\ ,- Y /p(41 N 11Y= \ \ / / I P N \\\ , < \ter V / 8 / / A / vv- __xe.__ 1 la A' / �v I �� ,, J i / �I , \N /l\ j 11 i;.-nt 5+ > 0 _ O'er �' -1---",)-,,'--- ,,,, Itv, ! \--P4. LJ>s 0 ,,, .- r �� " Y LI - IIL � �E-1 --__ y %�, - _---_+- 11, ! ;. ,, d 1 1 F' ��1 ----:--1_-_-1::::,---__------ _--�_ ._r t- N ,\ o• fil IF a { _ _----1- + " A. ,I o �o w I W 'l-'�Y-.x'� 33-F r- 11\ L Ime‘p¢ Z o B 'L_ -,e,_ �� I_ - W ," g 'fi5°, .---, I �G41 Y , YY rz w .Z W / " 1i i ' ///,' 'a W �v vV '� �' '_ g'� n a A [l.,F --1-1 it //// 7/7/7 7 a € . icG ' 8 i 1- - ti w^ ;U [__ / q---1---,_g±19 Z `� /I// o W --,,,.°4-,- \° _, ° ; i ; 11 1 H U I R 1-----'99,-'b°,°°-,...!, "/ x `� [[ r- I 0.l O Z-' Ir--I 1i�'!-1`uysi3 a'rwvy0 �f7Y \°n„��, r � P7 W -X I / r-, c �, `ate, 7 w &"W 1Y ill` �/ I y 1- ._..... �..........�. _. .w. �__ ,4 I 1 ? 11 .-1 --- ;Ii 1 1 1 I/O Y\ LTi y/1/ , 11 O ,A Iii i ,„---17,, - ,,-//hi/ o v'\v -,,,.:6,.; a / 1 �p�a^,_ a� a[je j- \\ �_ 08`-@gyp T, l' a ___ ei . ,,.... , 1 ,, , N , 1,, W `A 1 I A Ii,, - 1.4 ,--,,1• .1,,,\Ir ant. IN.., : \ 1 Z-_,74,--_,4------,.-4„-_,--.41,-----...„: --, ; o i :'EE d E— p`'-'*- --<,-.4,.,,,,-,°.•°_"'-'„,.----,,.:-,.1-,--.,. d ° �+. r a»sN y , ae** :� im \' ' 0„�• \�'.``\moi \`, \ i Y V.E F—_`\ ',, \ i-ti- E _ _ = 0 ii ',1 $ s i CO w z �� I_.1 w a Hauling Route Dirt was brought from 3345 Fox Street to 143 Westwood Lane,Wayzata. • ' '- i — 15 min w ti - , .s.; A 1� t.�, t 6�6 mites a _ �, . , ,�. ' t 43,WestwoodcLane U t z, Orono rye x"4° �... ' ar •I�'�a ,� SZp. •, �, Sha ,* jp,.,,, - y 3345 Fox Street. $: r -, I v 13 min M411. ;� s • I ,- * -; iiii„‘i .Ar , keg...;- „rt , '.litt 7 . _ e. • ', iF�+��* . dc,. . .a' . -. t, I �co II ENDEL July 17, 2019 RE: 3345 Fox Street, Orono, MN Land Use Permit: 19-000871 Narrative: We imported sand for various areas of backfilling to prevent settling at a later date. We imported granular materials, recycled materials and class V for base at patios and the driveway as well as a base material below our lower level and sport court concrete floors. We exported excess clay soil to other sites as needed;the estimated yardage exported is between 90 and 100 truck loads at an average of 14 yards per load totaling+/-1260 to 1400 yards. TOPOGRAPHIC DETAIL EXHIBIT FOR HENDEL HOMES IN LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FULLERTON ESTATES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA -- --944--------T =-- = --- -T- _ ---... , ---.....: . ---9f, J \ \ 95 `�9'8— ���31 I 0— I } ! \ `mel A ---- ---:_�� 2 —�`�`�` � 943.0)I I 4 ` Sg Wi 1LINE\r v A t°s,.6 vA V A \ I GARAGE \•. (95 \ , .7.7) \ 419, \ \\ \ I\ \ \ I + • -,(957.2) rr4_4.. AhfF \\ \ \ \ , 1 GARAGE ` \ '1 \ (955.1) \\ \ \ \ ; I FLOOR. I\ \ 'I (959.2) V 956.7) V 1 1�,I \ PAVER ) `\� \\ li N \ DRIVEWAY 1 (957.5) ( `) \ 1 I c957. ......, \ I l \ (9ss6 o 9 .3) / r , .. to ' W N (947.5) / (957.7) 76) \... \ \\ I I 1 I ' 1 ___/.`/ % { 4 I: (95761 7 \ I / ^ACRT• \. / PRIMARY f .'IVEWAY '_'��. /SEPTIC 791 P, 95 / �+ -- (95— /_,�,.�` \,.. ... / SITE i . a+v L jN ‘a^ PAVER 9 � �,�DRIVEWAY _ _ / Y I ,L \ MO •59.9) �L',Jr (956.11 ter(14 i—.—��- /-- �`\\\ I \\ S� DRAINAGE AND �� o II �\\ ' 1 . //' UTILITY EASEMENTS---,./ �� 'I; \ / C9c�T \\ / / °� \ / D Op I \ / // ///�: •Bo R FOX \,.i \„ i any ,� \\ /� STREET (908.3) : denotes existing as—built spot elevation, mean sea level datum 917 : denotes existing as—built contour line, mean sea level datum 61 —/9301 denotes proposed contour line per approved grading plan, dated 4-4-19 G R 0 NT B E R G AND 0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1"=20' SCALE ASSOCIATES, I N C. and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND 7-16-19 SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS iOA No. 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 19-0538 952-473-4141 Mark S. Gronberq Minnesota License Number 12755 19-0536 HENDEL HOMES 3345 FOX STREET LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FULLERTON ESTATES CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS July 16, 2019 FILL AREA 1 DEPTH OF FILLET) AREA($f) VOL(CF) 0 20,200 0 2 15,000 35,200 4 10,200 25,200 6 7,000 17,200 8 2,800 9,800 87,400_27 = 3237 CY CUT AREA 1 DEPTH OF FILL (FT) AREA(SF) VOL(CF) 0 2700 0 2 550 3250 3250-27 = 120 CY CUT AREA 2 DEPTH OF FILL(FT) AREA(SF) VOL(CF) 0 3600 0 2 1200 4800 4 150 1350 6150=27 =228 CY Total fill vs. grading plan contours=3237 CY minus total cut vs. grading plan contours=348 CY = 2889 CY extra. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/18/2019 495 � px� a f 550 JJJ 111111111111 575 ai 560 Ti 55t; �F /205 re� 3 250 _t7} •FoxeSI 3280 3 400 3300 01 3320 3350 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 111 1 1 1 1 11 3345 Fox Street This data (i) 's furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(i)is fumishedwith no warranty of any knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin Couity GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55187/g is.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE:07/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 05-117-23 41 0020 38 05-117-23 44 0007 TRUE VICTORY CHRISTIAN FLWSP M H M SMITS&V E PEREZ 525 LEAF ST 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TRUE VICTORY CHRISTIAN FLWSP MARCELLINUS HERMANUS M SMITS 525 LEAF ST VIRGINIA ELENA PEREZ LONG LAKE MN 55356 5504 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424 38 05-117-23 41 0024 38 05-117-23 44 0008 CORNELIA D KLITZKE TRUST NANCY R BIGOS 555 OXFORD RD 3350 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CORNELIA D KLITZKE NANCY R BIGOS 555 OXFORD RD 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0026 38 05-117-23 44 0009 WALTER R MCCARTHY JR HUANG/WANG LIVING TRUST 550 OXFORD RD 3320 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 WALTER R MCCARTHY JR HUANG/WANG LIVING TRUST 550 OXFORD RD 3320 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0027 38 05-117-23 44 0010 TONKAWA MANAGEMENT LLC M H M SMITSN E PEREZ ET AL 580 OXFORD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 TONKAWA MANAGEMENT LLC NANCY R BIGOS 1140 TONKAWA RD 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0028 38 05-117-23 44 0011 B D GOODWIN&H D GOODWIN PELICAN MARCH TRUST 565 LEAF ST 3280 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BEN D GOODWIN KEVIN MCCABE HEATHER D GOODWIN PO BOX 61020 565 LEAF ST DENVER CO 80206 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 41 0029 38 05-117-23 44 0012 SEAN S WAMBOLD&M S HORARIK MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 575 OXFORD RD 3250 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 SEAN S WAMBOLD MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK MELISSA M HORARIK 3250 FOX ST 575 OXFORD RD P O BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 42 0001 38 05-117-23 44 0013 KLITZKE&WAMBOLD/HORARIK MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3200 FOX ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 L J AND CORNELIA KLITZKE MALLORY MULLINS/MARTIN LUECK 555 OXFORD RD 3250 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 P O BOX 576 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0005 KEVIN GARNETT TRUSTEE 3400 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 KEVIN GARNETT 13033 RIDGEDALE D#121 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 05-117-23 44 0003 WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3300 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0006 TONKAWA MANAGEMENT LLC 3295 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 TONKAWA MANAGEMENT LLC 1140 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Date Application Received: May 22,2019 *kes Date Application Considered as Complete:June 3,2019 �O 60-Day Review Period Expires: August 29,2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City AdministratorHO� From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: August 19, 2019 Subject: LA19-000056, Gregg Katchmark, 140 Leaf Street,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a creek setback variance Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval Background The property abuts the creek that flows from Lake Classen to Stubbs Bay which is a protected tributary and subject to a 75' structure setback as well as the standard limitations on hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Portions of the existing house, deck and patio are within 75' of the creek shoreline,which normally exists at approximately the 960' contour,fluctuations being controlled by the dam further south just east of Leaf Street. The property is located in the RR-1B (2 acre) zoning district.The property was granted structure and hardcover variances (16-3846, Resolution 6660) in 2016 for a covered deck,stairs and enclosed storage in the 75 foot creek setback. The property was granted a front yard setback variance from the road in June of 2019 (Resolution 6999). The property is substandard in area and width. The applicant is proposing an enclosed porch to be built on top of the existing 16x 24 deck. The footprint of the deck and building are not proposed to change. The variance is due to the massing increase with the addition of the roof on top of the deck. As noted above,the property was granted an enclosed deck on 2016;while the deck was constructed,the roof was not. Since the roof portion of the variance was not acted on and the building permit was closed out for the deck,the roofing structure variance approval has expired. A new variance is required to construct a covered area in the 75' creek setback. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420-Setbacks: No Setback Changes are proposed DISTRICT RR-1B Required Existing Approved with the Front Yard Addition Front 50' 36.7' 31.7' Side (North) 30' 30.2 30.2' Side (South) 30' 101' 70.4' Creek 75' 50' ; 50' LA19-000038 June 17,2019 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-420-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 (2 acres) 200' Actual 26,867 (0.6acre) 180' Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 26,867 (0.6acre) Allowed: 5,379 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,618 s.f. (9.7%) Applicable Regulations: Variance (78-1279)The City Code has a 75'foot setback from a tributary. The home has a current setback 50' feet from the tributary with the approve deck. The applicant is requesting to build a covered porch on top of the existing deck which would create new structure within the setback area. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot includes difficulties in its area and depth. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to expand the structure on a nonconforming lot of record is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the additions to the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within LA19-000038 June 17,2019 Page 3 of 4 the tributary setback, appears to be reasonable as the project will not change the current setbacks and will not increase hardcover. The property's reduced size and depth and 75'creek setback creates difficulties. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the uniquely small size and depth,and required setbacks are unique. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Few of other properties in the neighborhood have similar setback challenges, the subject property will not be out of character with the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable, as the single family home is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property has an extremely limiting building envelope. The front setback and creek setback overlap for much of the lot leaving a small triangle building area towards to south end of the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property is substandard is area and is has overlapping setbacks in the front and rear yard. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variance does not imminently threaten health,safety,or morals. . 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The proposed addition does not create any new footprint or hardcover encroachments. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. LA19-000038 June 17,2019 Page 4 of 4 Practical Difficulties Analysis The existing home is located in a nonconforming location. The front yard setback overlaps with the 75' creek setback located in the rear of the yard. With the limited building envelope creates the need for a variance for any addition to the home. The proposed addition on top of the deck creates minimum impacts to the property with no change to the existing footprint and hardcover. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Proposed Survey and Hardcover Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Adjacent Property Signatures Exhibit G. Resolutions Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary )plication Date: 07/17/2019 Address: 140 LEAF ST LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0411723220006 Land Use Number: LA19-000056 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: GREGG KATCHMARK Address: 140 LEAF ST LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Gregg Katchmark Company: Address: 140 Leaf Street Orono, MN 55356 gkatchmark@mac.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Enclosing Deck Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application Subdivision Application ❑ Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application ❑ Applicant Signature: file:///or-mail/...91%20thru/LA19-000056%20(140%20Leaf%20Street)%20Variance/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(1).htm[8/15/2019 4:52:22 PM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000056 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes, I'm just enclosing an existing deck that was approved two years ago. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes. This is a small lot that exist in where roughly 80% of land is in a variance restricted area. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: No 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: This is not an economic decision. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This is not a solar build 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Understood 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This will remain a single family dwelling. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: No 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: No 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, file:///or-mail/...%20thru/LA19-000056%20(140%20Leaf%20Street)%20Variance/Practical%20Diffieulties%20Documentation%20Form.htm[8/15/2019 4:52:49 PM] Letter View morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: No The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes file:///or-mail/...%20thru/LA19-000056%20(140%20Leaf%20Street)%20Variance/Practical%20Difficulties%20Documentation%20Form.htm[8/15/2019 4:52:49 PM] To whom it may concern, To make our home more usable for a growing family we are looking to enclose our deck and make it a 3 season screened in porch. This was approved two years ago with our deck rebuild but we needed to wait to incorporate the roofline with the garage. This work will not impact any of our foot print and does not move us closer to the creek. Thank you, Gregg CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR GREGG KATCHMARK 33 33 1 OF TRACT C, R.L.S. NO. 744 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IR A \ 1 ones), axis, 1 1 II 1\\ / J N/A°00%00" , 07u.4 ii.. .e. y19/ we j 1rr': / / \ • 33 yn— 2.63"4L�-rwa` (aw.�/ I I \� `1,. / \ ,/ 07,3) 91,,E— (9723),, 1, \k("I'"k,. Sa,5i57�. I' �I �(,. -...I uwE • • / .e sco / ,s,n+.c ���,kcpv`r � 1 ... • I 'nada{," I,u��,tf. � All ��,1 `: =,.I�>°'�( "<ia.l>.a.:' I 11 1 I`� `� o>„ 07�I , ,vee.n / gP CREEK _.. — I O ane) I / I (0p°") ( ) // ° 1 (SWAN LAKE) N O a7Ae)d / naae 1 CO / (9723) •Zi EXISTING CONCRETE leA L / 0 / / waoa I D 3 I / o"ikc/u I 11 (O / / _ HOUSE 3 ruse„ / I I SHORELINE OORELI ON <:i. #140 I W e(H) I 2 E� yy a> (Ye7.,) OAP 6`N0xW I / (aes.1) I U _ W1a72/ t) 4 \ m 2 ry yu) tl 8e', ' Iw ham'+ I I -� _ �i �w,io) (o,eo) i l r_e CA I /l i I 14M Cl) CO EL Q // I''''V i'/:ry ADDITION PROPOSED ,T R A C T c `-------' I/ N p> ICA II -( 7' i ,AViLl /(..,ii —1,9——__I iwicP 1 (900 1.\ wO a7=) � 14 O ' BLACKTOP / 75' „CD_ I DRIVE WAY / SETBACK I, LINE •• I I \ 0 Z I .�) /237,, \�� I 9 rl �,t�� I X // (uss.+) ("t\I/`/ / / oe,.z) ✓ �0•00 • ' w 1 / 1 _ _ _ = _ tee, / \ l �00 v,,a , pp" �i _�CI'r,SC H PNE 'Ce l'h5, jl'ri AO • 03.0, ... >10 i.o'"'7,..--1.-..„-; S Ip°pp ta7a,)rac/ / tw,n! 80.00 eox v°E -S 90°00'100" W 113.00. 33 . .. i ... .u7 l..:.I'i i_ .. _.._. I 33 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 744, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. • : denotes iron marker found (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum —--817——: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum (,' Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, deck, driveway, retaining wall, trees, spot elevations, topography and all visible "hardcover', and the proposed location of a proposed addition thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. }ATE DESORPTION cu c PROPOSED s GRONBERG AND I hereby ce tify that this p' ,mpeaifiaatian,or report wU ASSOCIATES, INC. d that I a a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under ' the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND 2-14-17 SURVEYORS & SITE PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE ./lee-s.-•(..Z Joe No. LONG LAKE,MN.55356 "" - "—"A 19-136 - 952-473-4141 Mark S.Gronberg Minnesota Livens Number 12755 19-136 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet .5;.‘44.15110" f r� Property Address: /`70 L E� i T T. AGR E CG K4 TC//}-IAA K) `'4'ESHo" y Prepared b : Date: p t, avBF� ,� A/roc/Arc/, ivc . •4—Of-Jilt- 5- — r- 5- /5-/y Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) 4111M Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1 STING HARDCOVEIj) In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A //Gym/' 105/ S.F. B perk °Lie ,D AcI/ 3sy S.F. C /RAckr to 40A1V wRY 2235 S.F. D 770 GP / S.F. E ieET4 j //.✓G &AIL Y 2 S.F. F Gvpp0 RET/i,✓IMF 4114 Gts 82 S.F. G CONCbeETC /ifT'v J$ / S.F. H UiDoD RFT04c4‘,/,✓, 1.4.141,4 /3 S.F. freflit j y/ S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. S.F. W S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover y26-0 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): E AEr4/A/atiG [,d4 iz 5e2 S.F. f lveeD itfrA/.v,4/G 1•4/A44t 2 S.F. N Guff.'" X 6-1-A.,1/,.v(.' is/4 LL y2 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 1.17 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 9,23 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area it BOVE' fu/4.v Lnk f t CX c4,, G EA F yr. /t/L✓ _ Z6_ yr 7 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] /,S 35 (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono _40N0 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet \A ht Property Address: /y0 ZC',/ F �'T, (cAcac k-4r'rN�t,t4k) \7..„, t ` `ik sHoo Prepared by: ,GR covet cit c f 4 f rQ C/ATEr, /A/C. S- /5- , 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: 'ROPOSED 'ARDCOVE-• In the following'table, identity ali i ems of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total tuare Feet) ( q (Example) (Garage) _24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A /,Ctit4iE' Crx/jfri..iGil_ /DS/ S.F. B /QJ C 14 01/EA p_0 A Cbl ery S.F. C 4txta, 4,tflffty45' /, Z235— TV/ � � , � RC,urrr,� /if 911 S.F. D Sr6nP re ?i S.F. 1 E 1F f'f eervA-V-44444w $r _ _PE/A/ - AFkovcD —*+2-- S.F. F LirdIi11 Ac M G Gs✓4 t f 11 2 2 S.F. G . (,vcA f'7Y d r/0 t 3 9/ S.F. H 44/1441 ,r1-4,�.1.4...-G AtiAL , I' /3 S.F. J i .—- At , EC//VG PEMGvcp -- -- S.F. /lift _IE.# /DD/'£/G,v S`o0 S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N _ S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. x S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover y236' S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): _ S.F. it- dfp A'rv.-A,Ir_J -i;- Ie.r l 9/ Z. S.F. A/ 4t/&Gl Ar-rA1.,,/VF I4 LA_ /3 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover ?.5 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line42)from line(1)] et/J./ S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Aeolic. JW4t/ L AKE f Exstv0/A/c L F,t F 1'T. l•G,w = 26', RE7 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage ((3)+(4)] /5; 4f/% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 — — — -- — r T- .-.j uA- M N7N/1473.. .b4 R. *il A-r Y J SAI e. A u 3 to J rki yea 3 N --- _..._., d 1 b ill ! ! . 1 1 _. r I r3 -1--- 0_ v- . , ..__._ i 1 , _ , „.. 4 i ' i , , . ; 1 I , , 11 I I ( V Isr oi—: i >•.$ A..4 V ' z Q dot Jbb ti N d m ; I/ 1 - - - 1 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) iN0M ht� r 1QSQ \✓t)of �� c.,—,--,..),—,0%,_. 1-1i)) 1`,,,.4\ [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at NO I .444 ,c}- _also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement pla s and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Prope77 /w r Sash Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) t V 4 k [�f iV l�� of ?)2 o5 �,r i i1'i�l !�%L.L. iii av� S)-3 S� [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at No LPc- LS+ also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. NLG' 41 k'5)iv t, -.4-,*- (--(1_- 41,7 2 y zv/ / Property rt Owner ' Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) Nj x ��U<'f,_2/ 16r/41G of //0 Z (IF [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at - also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. —S- 2 6=/ 9 Property Owner / Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. r - +,...=i s .'�.:_..w.. - ., . . . .................................•-..... ....., . .. -- - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we)GI- f_r of cff,5— [paint name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1•-0 LPc,C S- also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improv- ent •tans and that the proposed neighbors project or use requires Council approval. Poe Property 9.. 'ner Dat- Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 7 o CITY OF ORONO h RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �4,� ��` NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-420,78-1279 AND 78-1680 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 140 LEAF STREET ET -FILE NO. 16-3846 WHEREAS, Gregg Allen Katctmnark and Rebecca Eve Katchmark, husband and wife, (hereinafter the"Applicants")arc owners of the property located at 140 Leaf Street within the City of Orono(hereinafter the"City")and legally described as follows: Tract C,Registered Land Survey No.744,files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin,Minnesota the"Property:);and WHEREAS,the Applicants on June 23,2016 made a complete application to the City for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-420, 78.1279 and 78-1680 in order to allow the construction of additions to the existing single family residence consisting of a covered deck,stairs and enclosed storage area,such additions constituting structure and hardcover a.portion of which will be located less than 75 feet from a protected tributary where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed; and WHEREAS,on July 18,2016 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code,the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on July 18, 2016, the Planning Commission on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval of the variances as presented;and WHEREAS,on August 8, 2016,the Orono City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 1 4,0 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �` " , �=� NO. 6660 t 4k SHol-fc A2. The Property is located within the RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential District which requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 200' for construction of a single family residence. A3. The Property is 0.62 acres in area, being 180 feet in defined width. The property is considered as legally nonconforming with regard to lot area and lot width. A4. The property is located within Storm Water Quality Overlay District Tier I which allows 25% hardcover. The proposed residence additions will result in total hardcover on the property of 4,212 s.f.or approximately 15.7%,well below the maximum overall hardcover allowance for the Property. Hardcover within the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed is 1,070 s.f. A5. The applicants are proposing to reconfigure an existing deck into a covered deck with storage below, on the east side of the residence. The property abuts the creek that flows from Lake Classen to Stubbs Bay which is a protected tributary and subject to a 75' structure setback as well as the standard limitations on hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Portions of the existing house, deck and patio are within 75' of the creek shoreline,which normally exists at approximately the 960'contour,fluctuations being controlled by the dam further south just east of Leaf Street A6. The existing house is two levels with a flat roof,and the proposed deck area reconfiguration will retain that styling. The construction will be occurring almost entirely over existing patio,deck or driveway hardcover, and no hardcover incase is proposed.The additional superstructure of storage area enclosure and deck roof constitute new structure within 75' of the shoreline,requiring a variance for hardcover conversion and structure within 75' of the creek. A7. The proposal to replace the existing deck in its existing footprint, add a roof over it, and create enclosed storage under it, will not increase hardcover from the existing levels. Existing and proposed hardcover at just under 16%is well below the 25%Threshold for the site, and no additional hardcover is being added in the 0-75' zone, so runoff from the site is not expected to increase. A8. The only new structure footprint proposed is the 4' extension of the deck southward and the stairway leading to the driveway. This constitutes 46 s.f.of added structural hardcover in the 0-75' zone, while overall structural coverage on the lot will still be at only 5.5%, well below the 15%limit. A9. The proposed roof over the reconfigured deck will provide functionality while enhancing the architectural styling of the existing residence. Because the proposed deck roof is well below the 30'height limit,it is not expected to be visually intrusive from off-site. 2 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ,,NPL NO. 6 6 6 O sHo�� A10. Lots in the Swan Lake Addition(subdivided in 1959) which borders the creek, including homes on Leaf Street and Cygnet Place, are typically %.l acre in size. This area was developed prior to the current 2-acre zoning. The dam that created a pond from what was initially a narrow creek, was constructed between 1956 and 1960 based on available airphotos. At the time the applicants' home was constructed,the City would have not had a 75' setback from the creek. Prior to 1992,the creek would have been considered as a wetland for setback purposes,with a structure setback requirement of 26' and no hardcover limitations. Al 1. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: 131. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. .. ." Single-family homes are an allowed use within the RR- 1B zoning district, and the proposed deck and storage area are common elements of single family homes. B2. "Variances shall only be permitted... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The proposed construction is for a residential use which is consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance,means that: i. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however,the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." iii. The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality." The property owners are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the specific setback requirements of the Zoning Code relative to hardcover and structure location result in the need for variances in order to construct the deck and storage area. 3 o CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 14. j 6660 NO. The plight of the property owners is due to the location of the existing house,deck and patio areas which based on available City records were created prior to the 1992 establishment of setback and hardcover standards relative to the tributary creek. The property owner did not create this situation. Reconfiguration of the deck and storage area as proposed is not anticipated to alter the character of the neighborhood,as the proposed additions are in an area of the property that already is covered by structures,and the proposed additions are not anticipated to be visually intrusive. B4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. B5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 136. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family residence is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 137. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling" This condition is not applicable. B8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The conditions applicable to this property are consistent with all properties that abut protected lakeshore and protected tributaries in Orono. However,the condition of having existing hardcover and structure within the 0-75' Shoreland setback zone is less common,and provides a basis for approval of the variances that would otherwise not exist. B9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.". The conditions apply to many other homes on lots abutting protected tributaries in the Orono which as a result of the required setbacks may have become nonconforming under the new Shoreland standards adopted in 1992;but do not apply to a majority of lots within the RR-1B district. 1310. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant" The existing hardcover and structure are considered to be nonconforming but became so when the Shoreland standards were adopted in 1992. The applicants have the right to retain and maintain the existing deck 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � z � NO. 66 60 < 55H0� 1t and patio. However, approval of variances will allow for additional storage below the deck without having increasing any impact on hardcover or runoff from the site. The proposed roof over the deck is anticipated to provide greater livability without any new impacts on hardcover or runoff,and minimal if any impacts on the visual character of the neighborhood. B11. 'The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting of the variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. B12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The location of the existing home and deck in relation to the creek is a practical difficulty,as adherence to the setback requirements for structure and hardcover would disallow the intended upgrades and merely allow replacement in kind of the existing deteriorating deck. CONCLUSIONS,ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-420, 78-1279 and 78-1680 in order to allow the construction of additions to the existing single family residence consisting of a covered deck,stairs and enclosed storage area,such additions constituting structure and hardcover a portion of which will be located less than 75 feet from a protected tributary where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey and site plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and the conceptual building plans attached as Exhibit B. Any amendments to the approved survey, site plan or building plans which are not in conformity with City codes or which require further variances will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Applicants shall comply with the permitting requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the owners, but are permissive only ami must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the project and 5 ? iO CITY OF ORONO Ivsic RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � G;�' NO. 6660 tFSHo�-, commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date(August 8,2017). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein,and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned Owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Owners and the Owners' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 8th day of August,2016. ATTEST: Tiegs,.y ,Jfi -Id ded6tilL City Oa Lili Tod McMillan,Mayor Property Owner Property Owner 6 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � ; NO. 6660 � sKo� STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2016,by Gregg Allen Katchmark,husband of Rebecca Eve Katchmark. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of_ ,2016,by Rebecca Eve Katchmark,wife of Gregg Allen Katchmark. Notary Public 7 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR RECE GREGG KATCHMARK JUN 2 ps PC Exhibit a. ( j OF TRACT C, R.L.S. NO. 744 CITY OFORONO 33 33 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 70» TRACT B _,,..\,--•"*.----- 44tit-N.,...a/0°0 0 1/00" g ii 1 i 1 1 \ ` '�'`' ' N / ! I ``- ‘T -'--- ;V+ +"' ;1 I e , " (G.4-1) ping AV I 1 4,:,,,,1 / .. •' :k = 1' - 41...''' . \ '4\0' / I +: / CREEK'�.f,t .i.: , Vf1LC1� o rum)/ /1 i r� /' try ; ` (SWAN LAKE) U. q / ,/ pa i / 1CO i I v- / Onsi EXIST1NT / r1!'4( / / I f. O a. .:d + I `' '�' j LOT 4 �"1 / / I .e #14o i / I I 1 r"'o-°° `o_ 1 / I 71, is".t! DM z.T. / o I I 1 i 1---- i / • 0 214 ‘ ----- P4MOSED 1 / '''''------see- , . 2 W dam) /Nrr. -_ ill _ r.,° h? t 1 ,~,'.;) Co rn $t 1.74 4. \T ACT 1 `---40-...___, r1/ w I a•�► Y / ,. / Ii a.! / / ‘ X11; ! ON E� 1 j''1• / 'a"; �.� \` I I ; p r' I f W f:) 1 —`t" l' 1 BLACKTOP / 7seraar.�cc N I f fii rn Sp A O ( I DRIVEWAY / LAE ( 1 to O j 1 / I / t / - - °. t•, > 6660 . Resolution Exhibit B MP Mir ibis leo mil Va.grommet i • N 1 W N E C 1YI,. 1.#iy ii el s{+Jtt • ' "P[ K M'ilk � ii r� I + �j '1 1 YY 1 ;.;;R,,-......i5 ",2.15 ••p K •r-i,,.., dl41 gl6.rlboirak aoff I*edit J RECEIVED a� 22 iNg MV 2YboY # 3846 ,mw CtilY"'C421° # 3846 r i I.-4 N, 1 �_.47' , M j z II i •4 1 il i ry A ImCBVED #3846 aw,x2=> AN 22 Zny # 3846 c.-0, 11111 1111E11 11 I I Doc No T05627186 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Jul 11, 2019 3:00 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 132 Pkg ID 1843843E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1418845 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. -Orp CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y .c`' NO. 6 9 9 9 -kEs H Os-- , A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-420 FILE NO. LA19-000038 WHEREAS, on June 3, 2019, Gregg Katchmark("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 140 Leaf Street and legally described as: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 744, files of Registrar of Titles (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the application was for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow 31.7 foot setback from the front property line where 50 feet is required; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2019, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS,on June 17,2019,the Planning Commission recommended approvalof the variance; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2019, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File # LA19-000038. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the RR-1 B Zoning District. \7LOkW1`?- CITY OF ORONO ti RESOLUTION OF THE C,J�T COUNCIL CNO. 69 kESHG� 3. The Property contains 0.6 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 180 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: a. Front Yard Setback 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed front yard variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot includes difficulties in its area and depth. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to expand the home on a nonconforming lot of record is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the additions to the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the front setback, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and depth and 75' creek setback create difficulties. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the uniquely small size and depth, and the location of the protected tributaryand required setbacks prevent a reasonable residential footprint. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Other properties in the neighborhood have similar setback challenges, the subject property will not be out of character with the neighborhood. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 2 v.(3.Aip CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF9CIIY f OUNCIL 1 �` NO. y G l9'cEs HORt 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the single family home is an allowed use In the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property has an extremely limited building envelope. The front setback and creek setback overlap for much of the lot leaving a small triangle building area towards to south end of the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property is substandard in area and has overlapping setbacks in the front and rear yard. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variance does not imminently threaten health, safety, or morals. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The variance for the front yard setback in necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. Other locations impact the creek yard, or side yard setbacks, which impacts massing. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow 31.7 front yard setback,subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 5/15/2019 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be 3 �O p CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CI IN COUNCIL ti� NO. 6 9 " `'IkESHO completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (July 8, 2020). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. CPA ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 0 day of (it(/y �, 20 ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: � t na Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 4 6999 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR GREGG KATCHMARK 33 i 33 I OF TRACT C, R.L.S. NO. 744 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA r a,., i TRACT B ...� ,1'`� / q \ M..,, / ; I ��1 \ / �_ --••---- / __,......4 /I°"a . -. 5,..,- / / / I 1 I \\\ / Y — 7 x_.1- {x, . , / / r,r / 0.4 °�✓—e,.-1 'l.� f1'w. 9 q 4. .,, ( m;..:, \ , `.\ Q / / Wig rJ / V r I i 11 1' ` Z 1 KF 0)I 1 i , CREEK as / � (SS ) Uto ' I4I / g / I ,o r ,,., 1 ... � ,, H� / :�/ / IiI . / I I ZLOT T 4 g�, 912911/42 A5 I .� I °i�o-e°N c0W / LL „• t s[x I / H/ ,. / 0.•,/� \ to N ' CO W a< ,-"'� ffA PRoPOsED ii 1T1ACT q. '__iie--- �/ w p / �, exw , , \; / / / di )\ q j" / ' W O I BLACKTOP / 73'\`.. l p I i I I ! DRIVEWAY , straw(� i 0 / 1 / � cm i / I I I / \ / I p i - i..r ``'F'// / / i I I / s.-0 /' I 1 ' 0 \ I , " ti''r ia7 i,., wY 510 \moi 33.aA > r "-S 90°00'IO0" W 113.00--" LOT t l I 33I SWAN LAKE 2ND ADD I LEGAL DESCRIPTDN OF PREMISES : Tract C,Registered Land Survey No. 744, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. •: denotes Iron marker found (100.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum • --917--: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum t,) Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, deck, driveway,retaining wok, trees,spot elevations, topography and all viable "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed addition thereon It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. =1: 1111M4MI.IMOM 0001! . GRONBERG AND ly m:, a: '°^,.5:, ° �v ASSOCIATES "se' Ls,d5,m y>touter sew INC. ..a•..,e.,of 9,. CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LAND 2-14-17 — SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS Al a Nn —.1 052-473-4141 LANE.1e.553'35 19-131 151-473-4741 Met S o-wMrq eErn..ey Nurpr 12755 19-131 City of Orono 6999 �tio Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: /70 F TT. (GA E G G K.t rc,y,t1AR k) `� L `'r�3No-` Prepared by: Date: GAAvg Fx G Afa pelt re /A/C 5- Is-i9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) �1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tler 4 Tier 5 Step 1(ISTING HARDCOVEI In the following table idintViTI items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width (Square Feet) ) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A 4/6141 E' 105/ S.F. a pFrk °art ADACI-/ S.F._38y C Lfe A fi/EWVAi' 2235 S.F. D .77oGf S.F. E .+?Err,1✓it,G Gt//(L. 2 S.F. F Gd,,a R f rt I kid NF 4(.04(LS 8 2. S.F. G CONC1cr6 'ATI 38 / S.F. H It/DDD FI✓G 4414 4.1- 3 S.F. J'TAMI / S.F. S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 92 f;D S.F. Excludable Hndcov r(Sae City Code Sac 78-1684): E Acrr/A/MX" aid 4z 4f2 S.F. f wep r e .t 6t�,v.4G 1.444L L r 2 S.F. A/ l4f/dAd 'err 4..v/.vt id.d4 LL /3 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 3 7 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 9123 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area i1 gave* Jw4*-Gn KF 1- f X cG 4 64 F fr R/w = 26.86 7 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] /S. 15 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is en information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the Information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the CRY Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono 6 9 9 9 s..oN Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: /y0 Lt=AF 57-, (GRfGG k4rr6/AtnRk �M›- Prepared by: ,-- Date: R Pae Fac G. f#010 C/ATET0 /AA". S-/5- , 9 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)Crier-1) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:('ROPOSED AARDCOVE In the following-fable, identity an i ems of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey g ( q are Feet) (Example) (Garage) r_f24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A t/[slF CFxtlflit,Gal_ /DS/ S.F. B �rx 121/Fg Pgi r/,( ,r / S.F. C BG4rkre", /_Av IftvrtY fl(ir :11 2235- 7V1lctc-c /��5' S.F. E 5-7-6 OP .. �t3�.�/ S.F. E i. JE/A/C' Ac -4 2vrD -- S.F. F _, e.ay1 Lcrk_.,u/44dG £4ALt . /1 82 S.F. G _>;'aif/Cs<ern: /ir/0 ,rS.F. H adVo'.2 'ETA, .,e.G Ai.t_ 1 . Ii S.F. l // /ICJ,t/F'REMov6Q - y.1 S.F. J ArtPt.,fci 4e17/!/ ' 0 S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F7 P S.F. Q _ S.F. R 1 S.F. • S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 1 y2 36 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. / .. 1.-1' nD itfrA.a,1 -c 1.4./A LE f p.z. S.F. /1 44,001 F71..'.NG /444 LA. /3 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover ?5 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 4/if/ S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Ag OW Jlti,{N L4/0' t E1kcL1-10/rr/G ZCAit 1T• /.0,w . 24', Fr67 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage ((3)+(4)] /f. y/% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an Information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 • ot 1 !il , 1 il r :1 5 I.1 r . il i----,&.i.-,.----. -1-.--7-----t-------- --,:. I . 11--- — ,f4T •-.4.-4-. 7 I . ii - 1 . , z A . ;11:-. - ........-_-.--.---1,-...: it INIM';::\! fa 1 1. • l' ' li... ‘• I • t / 1 ! Thi' I . I t I, ,1 101 1 -40J,w4..r*sorwar4m_ .1:111, 1 (1 t- r f1 isollt .-: - - • iti ' s,!..• •i,,... •-; - - . t 1 ,,,. ,i ;, I, N ; • I ' . ---- \ : - • F L• ! - 1 lot- ; • .; 4= ', . >. . [.1 16 . 1 ' V V .t:.17-. • ! . \ • i . •-:L \ I 4 I 1 _\,. 1 •10. 1 ‘• • •. .. ! 9 . . . -- I . • • ., ,,gr..... , X\--\\ NNNNNW - • • - - - -----zo'=0.---- - I —— — — — — — —--— — .46.....,=—, ...." • t\ ••- , 21.• , i; . • - pal . '. , • . , . - ••-- • I. . . •• .r4 ! 1\ ill.6111111111 1 ' I ......:• . ' 0 , H '. . •.0 -.0 0 i Ii �a/'� 8.i 'C i'J I _ } t tri; • • w } t V - l' .11 . ,:4 I • *I i . I 9 �d Iii Za -i • ____.;112,7__L iimr-rri • .•, .a •Y i li•r . III 1 : -- H 11111 t 1 •,';,.i. 4 -• 1.4 - i , , ...• 11,! , . vi3.1 . . r . • 11 . „ • . :, . ' • • 11 . . ill , . li . • , . . ' ' II _ _ _--11 • • . 1 - . , • 1 • . • . • , C\3 . • 1 .1 . •---r • • I , . , • . . • • ., .• ''" r--T(, 1 ii '' . ' - .7 : . .- 11 . ' i.. '-' / - - - . • ./ , . t • , • . . : I I I . . . . 1 . 1 ' I 1 I .. 1 I I i . 1 II , ! • I I , '.. \ . I f - • I • 1 1 I 1 H I 1 1 . . . \ • ' ' ., 1 '' • 1 j I • i , I I • . • . . . •• „...... ,,, • . . I I 4 , . , • , . , I . . .• . . I . 1 . i ' • - -- --- ---1-1 ' , . ... : \_..x , 11 • . .. I , . . 11 . . . . . . . . -,. :.,..-.,. . .... . -- 1 I I r\-, i , - ,,..,....:, ....'..: .• . 1 , , II f •:', ''':4„ . • ': . i I . .. I , ... ..,..,,: . • - 1 • ---' • . a. r-- , . I I . • • i (I . I I RUN DATE:07/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 04-117-23 22 0003 38 04-117-23 22 0017 38 05-117-23 11 0010 DAVID RUSCIANO A P SMITH&K PASTIR-SMITH C E DUNKLEY&J T GILBERTSON 3195 WATERTOWN RD 80 CYGNET PL 3240 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID RUSCIANO A P SMITH&K PASTIR-SMITH CHAD E DUNKLEY 110 MINNETONKA AVE S 80 CYGNET PL JILL JOANN THEIS GILBERTSON WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 3240 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0004 38 04-117-23 22 0022 38 05-117-23 11 0011 JEROME J HALL VIL OF ORONO A THORESON&C THORESON 80 LEAF ST 100 CYGNET PL 3300 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JEROME J HALL CITY OF ORONO ANDREW THORESON 80 LEAF ST PO BOX 66 CASSANDRA THORESON LONG LAKE MN 55356 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 3300 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0005 38 04-117-23 22 0023 38 05-117-23 11 0012 M S&K J GRONBERG MARGARET D ROSSING L P MCCARTY III/L H MCCARTY 110 LEAF ST 130 CYGNET PL 3340 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK S GRONBERG MARGARET D ROSSING LISA H&LEROY P MCCARTY III KATHERINE J GRONBERG 130 CYGNET PL 3340 GRAHAM HILL RD 110 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0006 38 04-117-23 22 0025 38 05-117-23 11 0014 GREGG KATCHMARK ANDREW S ZIMMERN JASON KAPSNER/JULIE KAPSNER 140 LEAF ST 180 LEAF ST 75 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 GREGG KATCHMARK ANDREW S ZIMMERN JASON P KAPSNER 140 LEAF ST 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 300 75 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0008 38 04-117-23 22 0026 38 05-117-23 11 0015 K T KROLCZYK&M A KROLCZYK L R BELLAMY&C M BELLAMY GRAHAM HILL PRES HMWNRS ASSN 65 CYGNET PL 200 LEAF ST 115 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 KEVIN&MICHELE KROLCZYK COLLEEN M BELLAMY GRAHAM HILL PRES HMWNRS ASSN 65 CYGNET PL 200 LEAF ST GEORGE W STICKNEY LONG LAKE MN 55356 PO BOX 209 115 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0009 38 04-117-23 22 0033 38 05-117-23 11 0017 GREGORY J EHALT JEFFREY R DAHL&LOIS S DAHL GRAHAM HILL PRES HMWNRS ASSN 85 CYGNET PL 3065 WATERTOWN RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 GREGORY J EHALT JEFFREY R DAHL&LOIS S DAHL GRAHAM HILL PRES HMWNRS ASSN 105 CYGNET PLACE 3065 WATERTOWN RD GEORGE W STICKNEY LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 115 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0010 38 04-117-23 23 0011 38 05-117-23 14 0002 GREGORY J EHALT RF&R D EZELL MICHELLE SHELP 105 CYGNET PL 185 CYGNET PL 265 LEAF ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 GREGORY J EHALT ROXANNE&ROGER EZELL MICHELLE SHELP 105 CYGNET PLACE 185 CYGNET PL 265 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0011 38 04-117-23 23 0012 38 05-117-23 14 0065 H R ANDERSSON&E E MORIARTY BRIAN CLARK&RENAE A CLARK M K KISSNER&N S KISSNER 135 CYGNET PL 253 CYGNET PL 3205 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 H R ANDERSSON&E E MORIARTY BRIAN R CLARK MATTHEW K KISSNER 135 CYGNET PL 253 CYGNET PL 3205 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0012 38 04-117-23 23 0013 38 05-117-23 14 0066 L G BADER&N J BADER KIMBERLY JAE CARSWELL AMY S KORSI REVOC INT TRUST 145 CYGNET PL 261 CYGNET PL 3215 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LOUIS G&NYLA J BADER KIM CARSWELL KEITH P KORSI&AMY S KORSI 145 CYGNET PL 261 CYGNET PL 3215 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0016 38 05-117-23 I1 0009 D C SHAUGHNESSY ET AL M J MESENBURG/M M MESENBURG 60 CYGNET PL 3210 GRAHAM HILL RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID&ANN SHAUGHNESSY MATTHEW/MICHELLE MESENBURG 60 CYGNET PL 3210 GRAHAM HILL RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/18/2019 3245 + 25 20 3195 3380 Ala,L di 60 (lel 30F. Its i 65 tet :i ort 3340 } (5180 (41 85 t@I 115 ` 100 tx31 3065 .00 110 - '7 (a Inc. 1 105 Y Vf l'-4-,', , 41i' 240 '''$''''4.'°'',1:',.,.°' b � yt sr� s �' 14D fPYry ., .,,���" . 135 rt9 3270 a, ,,A^+, A"'t..`", r 180 . 1 145 131 , £ <*!-S£.zx I t1:....:°.1",...;,::.:...4',,J.....4°.f v './ , ? ,ate 200 . „ ,.., 3.., ,:,.;ir ,.,., f.,,,:., ,, , RF +i 2.. If f . ::::;;Ii ,mia -r: Sse 3205 *� ..� 185 "-� rftj ,, , 4 _. 4. ,i .,. .. 3215 ,. tsT I>s+ 261 I"' 265 258 250 248 240 285 • Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 ( ( ) I ( I I I 140 Leaf Street This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(I)is furnished withnowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liablefor any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 300 6th Street South,M i nn ea pd i s,MN 55487/gisinfo©hennepin.us Date Application Received: 07/17/19 Date Application Considered as Complete:07/17/19 ‘7LOAto 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/15/19 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator ! L. 41 ESHO°' From: Melanie Curtis, Planner i'Y1GG Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: #LA19-000057,Jessica Johnson o/b/o Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Blvd; Project Site Address:430 Old Long Lake Rd CUP Amendment;Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant requests setback variances for proposed accessory buildings; a variance to the limit of oversized accessory buildings; and a variance from the maximum total square footage of accessory buildings in conjunction with an amendment to the existing Golf Course CUP to construct new accessory buildings. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The Wayzata Country Club is requesting approvals in order to replace two, outdated and undersized maintenance buildings. The two building are located along the western edge of the property, closest to the Luce Line trail. Currently there is a 3,300 square foot cold storage building on the north side of the Luce Line Trail. Wayzata Country Club proposes to construct a new, 8,000 square foot building for cold storage to be placed in the same general location. On the south side of the trail,there are existing buildings/storage container structures which occupy approximately 8,500 square feet.These buildings/structures consist of a garage,wash bay with chemical storage, and storage containers for equipment storage. In their place, WCC proposes to construct an 9,111 square foot building which will include a wash bay,storage, break room, repair shop, maintenance office and equipment storage. This building will be situated into the hill to screen its mass, activities, and impact from the residential properties to the west. See the applicant's narrative for a full description of the proposed improvements and uses (Exhibit F). The golf course use is located within the RR-1B, 2-acre residential zoning district and is permitted through a conditional use permit (CUP). Improvements and changes to the site and use must be addressed through the CUP amendment process. Additionally the Code restrictions for"residential" accessory buildings are not conducive to the needs of a golf course use. Therefore due to the size, number, and location of the proposed buildings and improvements, variances are required. FILE#LA19-000057 19 Aug 19 Page 2 of 6 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-418—Accessory Building Setbacks—For Golf Course Use: Cold Storage—North Building Required Existing Proposed South/Luce Line 50' 55' 30' West Side (residential) 50' 135' 115' Maintenance Building/Office- South Building Required Existing Proposed 0'Shop/Storage North/Luce Line 50' Garage encroaches over 19' property line±3' West Side (residential) 50' 26' Shop/Storage 10' Section 78-1403-Accessory Building Coverage: Total Lot Area* Total Accessory Building Footprint ±150 acres Allowed: 8,000 s.f. *Total combined golf course property area within the City of Orono Applicable Regulations: CUP: Golf Course (Code Section 78-418(1)) Golf courses are permitted within the RR-1B district by conditional use permit. Wayzata Country Club predates the contemporary regulations regarding golf course uses, but has over the years received amendments to the CUP for improvements to the property including building renovations and various modifications to the golf course. The existing storage and maintenance buildings are outmoded and in disrepair;the proposed buildings are necessary and support the golf course day to day operations. In addition to the standard accessory building setback requirements,the Code requires all accessory buildings associated with golf course uses to be located at least 50 feet from adjacent residential properties. NORTH BUILDING:The existing north building is approximately 55 feet from the south property line and 115'from the residential property to the west;the new north building is proposed to be 30'from the Luce Line property line and 115'from the west. SOUTH BUILDING:The existing buildings on the south side of the Luce Line both encroach on or over the Luce Line property line;the shop/maintenance building is 26 feet from the adjacent residential property to the west. The new larger south building will be 19 feet from the Luce Line property line and 10 feet from the west. However,the new building will be 70 feet from the nearest residence. The building is proposed to be situated in the grade of the hill to further screen the mass of the building. The building and yard spaces were designed to screen operating noise from the residences. FILE#LA19-000057 19 Aug 19 Page 3 of 6 Accessory Building Variances (Code Sections 78-418(1); 78-1434) Accessory building size limitations are based on the area of the property.The City Code requirements max out at 14+acres allowing a maximum single accessory building to 4,000 square feet and the total accessory building square footage allowed on a +14 acre property of 8,000 square feet. This limitation may make sense on a residential property where an accessory building larger than 4.000 may have a non-residential character. However the golf course use requires larger storage and maintenance facilities than a residential property. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The use for a golf course on this size property follows the general intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant's design is in line with the City of Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan,which include maintaining the natural character of the site,minimizing impacts to neighbors(screening,sound buffering),and natural resource impacts such as hardcover, grading, tree removal, and the control of storm water runoff off site. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The golf course use is permitted, and the improvements proposed to support this use are reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The landowner is proposing to construct buildings to support the permitted use oriented to improve upon the existing condition; and a. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Wayzata Country Club has been part of the community since the 1950s.Their proposed plan is intended to improve on the open space and natural character. In addition, most of the proposed development is screened by existing vegetation or built into grade to screen the buildings and activities from surrounding residential properties. FILE#LA19-000057 19 Aug 19 Page 4 of 6 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as golf course is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing golf course use and improvements, the proximity to adjacent residential, as well as the Luce Line Trail are unique to this property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The existing golf course use and improvements, the proximity to adjacent residential, as well as the Luce Line Trail are unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variances are necessary for the improvement of outmoded and failing buildings and facilities supporting the permitted golf course use. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The use of the property, and proposed improvements are not intended to adversely impact health, safety, comfort,and morals. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The existing facilities, which were built in 1956, are deteriorating beyond the point of functioning for the golf course.The new facilities are necessary. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; A golf course is a permitted use in the RR-1B zoning district and is consistent with the community management plan. FILE#LA19-000057 19 Aug 19 Page 5 of 6 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management; This criterion is met.The applicant proposes to improve stormwater management on the property. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The current building is served by well and septic system. The property owner is exploring inclusion into the MUSA and connection to the City sewer.Additional infrastructure may be needed;this will be reviewed by the Building Official and City Engineer. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The Wayzata Country Club has been part of the community since the 1950s.The golf course use is interwoven into the character and history of the area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The site is currently a golf course and the proposed improvements will maintain the surrounding character. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed facilities are designed to improve or lessen impact to adjacent properties by mitigating any negative impacts. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; This criterion is met.The proposed facilities are designed to improve or lessen impact to adjacent properties by mitigating any negative impacts. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare,vibration, odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness, or other means; Historically,the WCC has been responsive to neighbors' concerns. Staff has not received complaints regarding the use of the property,and the applicant has designed the improvements to improve the use and mitigate any potential nuisances on the property. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant is advised of this requirement and has provided a lighting plan; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare.This condition is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are FILE#LA19-000057 19 Aug 19 Page 6 of 6 observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties+Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the Wayzata Country Club's request to construct new building as proposed to be reasonable and appropriately scaled for the site. Public Comments Public comments have been received and are included as Exhibit H. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the CUP amendment and variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Site Plan Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Narrative Exhibit G. Lighting Plan Exhibit H. Public Comment Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/17/2019 Address: 430 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 3611823420003 Land Use Number: LA19-000057 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB Address: 200 WAYZATA BLVD W WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Jessica Johnson Company: CNH Architects Address: 7300 W 147th Street, Suite 504 Apple Valley, MN 55124 jjohnson@cnharch.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Rob Olson rob.olson@westwoodps.com Associated Contact: Kent Carlson kcarlson@inlanddp.com Associated Contact: Keith Dunn keith.d@bauerdb.com Associated Contact: Project Description: 2 new buildings to replace the existing facilities, 1 Golf Maintenance Facility & 1 Cold Equipment Storage Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision L J Concept Application 1. Conditional Use Permit rli Site Plan Application Li Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception .J Vacation Application Li Variance Application Applicant Signature: C444L PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000057 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: This is a required function for a golf course. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The setbacks on two sides of the site and the existing golf course create minimal building area for the replacement of the existing facilities. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The new facilities will improve the essential character of the locality. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Please see the attached narrative. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Please see the attached narrative. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The functions that are being replaced are typical for a golf course. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: These facilities are a necessary requirement to run a golf course. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The zoning code allows this function as a conditional use. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The existing facilities, which were built in 1956 are deteriorating beyond the point of functioning for the golf course. The new facilities will be an improvement on the existing facilities. . . . • ., FE7,1 \\C ..'1\'''',--\,,,` '-\\*\,.,,.\'` I, ' ',,- LEGAL DESCRIPTION(from Hennepin County Tax Records only) ' ' '‘.3 /)1,..//\-`--)'-----"'" --\''..-- -------.• \.,, - '-- - \\\\ . . "\ A c)%\,\A- V \\ Shown for reference only, This is not a record property description. '. \Q. sy..)---•/1- (-.1 i.,.., a ‘\.y-'-''''...--- ,-- :: ‘,\ II. ins -, —''---,—' , 0 1 I q• -, / k__,/ "----Q-"-°'-'."-"Qu."-"`,,-"`""r"---'"'7:71'„s",=f,=:,°:,',:::,;=:°"h` '4.A !g .. __., g, - - - \' \--' - \' \ -' - 1 me.ifililt - - ----1.--- - - / L.' ' on\ ....,, , - ,n-... -- --....-,t,„:=;:,,,,:=,,c,::,",=z,4,,zo,d,=,-;;;:,,,:::„,.,,,,,—.......„,.,-.— -----c 111°-,z) ' ' \ / - ,-- , // \ „y/ic„-, / / , . , ,‘ ,‘,, , ils ./- , .,... N.--..._ .\-- --/ , ....\,„„- - ,\,-„.. (i/2 , ,, ... ,,,,,„ \ - \ v-,/ /,- ` ' 71 ,-..,1 ) : I , , "-•\.,,\s\''''\‘\.\N4\.1-•2v,E\.\,\' \' ,-/ ''.si',, A'''''),-"V->s,`74 2,-0 , -I „,T\‘\, ? --/ (1 ,f LEGEND . A ; -L— I \\X s Y 1 i -43140' `>K‘„ '`'1\s , , \ , q \,\ ?; : N. \ , \,\\-\ ), ''''''-.4 ,„ ,'.-/,,k./. % ' '\\,'\\N. ' t\ (—N 1 q \ \ I ,,„„„0„,..„ , S ___ ..i, 7, ' 2 \ . ,,,, - .w, ,-- \‘,/, ,,, ,,,. ,‘ ,,,, ,,, , ..„,, ,, '-' \ , ...t t .. ) m ', ' kn ) ' ,,\1 Y. \\ \ \‘ ,6,.. \\.... ,-,.., ` W ' ......... / DATE 07/171s \\,.s.”, '', .',,\\,( ''' '''‘ 0 / /' 7.I / i''' : \ REVISIONS ( . ''l ' ' ' i ' / / / NS-4 \\' \ 1'44/. " '' '1 //'\ 4=1\ ,i1- A • ''-'••"•••'••'''""• '•''-'N. \ V'\ A \ ' \\ \ 1\ '' 'AY' (' '' ` \ ''\\A A'\ ' \ I'. i ' \ \/ \\ ''A -'..---") ' ---_/ ,) -, 1‘,/ \ /' Th ..` '\‘-\ \ ' c3,,'\ '‘ ` - \ '''',\ 't C -/.) ' ' ,\ \ ,/(// ) /- ////-\ \ \\ ' ,. N , i \, ? / -‘ -\ \\ / / '/ fr , /*/ 1 \\ ‘ ,, ,,ii 7//, , \,,...‘ / , r/ /) e, //7 / i x ,„...,\.‘,X ..,,, , 1 \ 1\ ,/ 'i(111/ -, /// ' 1 \\ i \ \ --,...„- -,. A. ' I/// i \\ ) ''. .r. EEE.:• 7C.,//, 1 , \ A' ' 0/1 0 . SoSC.) 0 ,,, \ ‘A z< ' ' L , /,--/'-' '' ' IP — / CO CO \ \ \\ ...e.-. .. --1 -,., w.,.......... ,,, 0 100 200 2 00 73 (7.) 2 , \_ ,---- II -• / k -4," '- / // '.:' \ . (D 76 R 2 g --___ \ s \ \\\\ '° \ jihnir' ' )' itilr7M4a. - - ', . _Ailiama. 'A.//,' i+_ La. .. -1- ', z/ Westvvood ; _ , -. in , :::- ;M::',;:::1,:=7.7.7.--• -_ „, , , 71 - i. • e • o i ..- . , 0 . ., NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 54.3.11111 :11:12::OBSI9,1.144 A2110 rtltltl. -,w- eoueuapeuy zi 'IN) .:,. qno fulunoo elezAem 14 Ii ! le 0 : i li ..!, i. : ,,, I, oc: . COH LL: g ; ; I ,;',.8:1! 0 iii 1 0 ill I I , • . H ; 8 8 81 ' I 111 i 0 Z ; 1 I .. 16 6 i• 1 1 1 I ; 8 0 E 00.40.0*-. 0 _. ,,- --\ --- \ ' \ -„ ,-- ) --- .„---- ,-- \ --,\ . . . . „ , --- ,---. ,- . - „,-- , X.\\ -.,.. I.. 1 ..,. ......., . . \\A.\ ' \, ../ . ft) , , I„_,- ------,„ , \ --:.. ... \ , , I ' , . • --'1"--- \ , t 1 . _ • , ..... ;g 0 .,-. * \ T 1 ; ..- i i t g — \ 7 , I , _- --- . / '\ ty, 7 : / ... \I \ \ I I . . ,,,-- ,,g / 4 ,' , , , 1 \ \ \ \ . .. , 5 n79 005,5515,55 ne5n0007375.d50 ' I / I i \\ \ \ / k \ 1 , ,-- r( ' - 4 1 • 1 i - ;--, \ , / ' a V \ ' \ \ \ V 1 \ ...-,,, „ 4„,. / - ----,_— s, \ N ` \ , V 1 s 1 _— \ - -. , - \• N \ I \ _ ' 1---7t\ N -> ' N '',--- — -• i\ . ' 111,64111"11.111111116."- -- 1 ., , i \ \ , • L-----1EDI- 1 i 1 z.7. z."-. I t \ -"- - \ - II . =NNW t 7 t i t ' / I ill/ /7 11\ \ I \ z z ' \ ,-- z , 1 , \. iz 1 / , \ 41-- k ' i- , • „,- , /- \ \ __, . - ' ,\• , \ \\ \, • 1 \ \ \ , 't = -'\ / ' / „.., , 1 s , -\ 1 . . , r 21 40r,a Ot,Ow„„.., IT Z 0 i ! I 1 R { • 0 03 H Hi Z II 0 H I -7-1 N 3 0 i In 0 3.3 .'! !13 '-X Cr) 5 ,!. 73 r.. 1 •, CNN Wayzata Country Club g - !.. Maintenance -.i.- -- I Roko C102 e Me,5155,5,551 i NA,. AiNa _ o o aoueualuiew- OOZE 9 o grin tiluno3 elezl(eM g he 0 D I- P. X� - '' ! z 3 5 z F s E ;y — o t=, 0 ,„„'.z o 1 W''3 o 2''' K 2 2 e T e $4 �?�8sooszi� �$ ss� Z o S - , cs p hi F8 a i E F - F 5a g 8 8°a °� m3 m e I.71 1- // ) ' • \ I I •Li i • I 1 I P\ 5 5 • . I • • • • / �'� • IF, TA -, • ° At 0 * ` d Aik ''� k r_.."._._. i B5 li ln1 c Y 1 • i , , ',, . �t 1 ,, 1 1 . . . 1 SITE LEGEND 0 i L ESISTING PROPOSED k ———— PROPERTS LINE -• S LOT LINE i S 11 ( \ — CURB AND GUTTER , ‘, IP OUT CURB AND GUTTER F,', ',.. - - POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL • .•• ,•••7. ....t., RETAINING WALL . x \ .,....... -- FENCE , 1 I CONCRETE PAVEMENT `I':-7 • s•s I I CONCRETE SIDEWALK ••-• •, Ma HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT •• -----—— = NORMAL DUTY ERNMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 •.......... 4(-- ,‘ • —_._.._ 0 NUMBER 0F PARKING STALLS A i 1 ,,, N. ,, 0 TRANSFORMER ff /C.\:' V 1 -.- TRAFFIC SIGN .., '-:•• I AFL POWER POLE •.__.,___.__ / 0 • BOLLARD/POST V•----: —____ / V 1•.--- ' SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ...-/ • EXISTING ZONING • PROPOSED ZONING .C.'-' • PARCEL DESCRIPTION PEI,11821420003 06 8 AC1 1.21140002(1D AC) a 1-- --- -- . • PROPER,AREA 77 5 AC(1 ND s on, -;L • MING IMPERMOUS SUREACEIRATIO, 1 94 AC 15 MI - .2: --- - _--- _-— • .57ING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SOUTH.T101 0 67 AC 10 86%) • F POPO.,IMPERNOUS SURFACE SOUTH(.110,D64 AC(0 81%) 4°- --- South 1r/1,Am...crease of 0 03 AC ---------- ---.--- ___-- ------ . . • ' • POSTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NORTH MATIO) 0 37 AC(048%) ..S•s Z • PROPOSED MPERNOUS SURFACE N0RIN Reap 0 55AC(0 7190 ,L.: - North impervssu•Increase ol 0 18 AC -V- • BUILDING GROSS SIZE 10 s Nor.C.Slow" 0000 SF 4 Sath Ma stert•Ice Fad, 8 750 SF CNN NO 19003 BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE 50 sADIACENT RESIDENTIAL SATE 07P 7,19 • REVISIONS 0 • PROPOSED SETBACKS 10•SIDE YARD IlIl ,/ • PARKING PROADED 27•DNR SETBACK 47 SPACES •a , .-- / * , , /, JD / / / . , / ,-. , ...... . , . a• , . See Plan-Overall / / .4 Westwood , , ,,,,' ,,,, , / 1 , 4. c) e 0 C\1 C.) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE LEGEND PROPOSED kel MSTING LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER ii-w ...- POND NORMAL WATER LEVE a A .:.:r i r r 1.. RETAINING WALL m se I' rI CONCRETE PAVEMENT s"; 1 I CONCRETE SIDEWALK .§ PAVEMENTEMI HEAVY Dim erummous PAVEMENT § �, 0NUMBER OF PARIUNG STALLS ` / eoear •O ~' BOLLARD/POST k P A li 11. CNH NO.:19003 * flipDATE: 05./19 �_ REVISIONS .... or 4' ll Y ` X F 6 t, U F C 7 U U C -. C a CIS (D i _-_ N F T a E ai CO £ R ` E Westwood Site%en-NoriM1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION N:\0007379.00\dwg\Civil\Exhibit\Wayzata Country Club-Site Aerial Exhibit.dwg,7/17/2019 5:05:46 PM,DWG To PDF-WPS.pc3 2 x " SITE LEGEND rer, V mmNc ...,....ii �9oeosEo aSE,,,mENE .. ..._ . EASEMENT o w aE O U EP u • no om NflO euocurnn V 9 a ,T=zrrI. te c t , I CONCRETE CV PAVEMENT . F " ." t I coucxE.EsoEwuK ® HN,weN>re,nMNou=e.NEMENI g ."1* .., 7.771 NORMAL Dun BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT A .- rrr 0 NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS 5 SOF mNnN s N o r Lt r _ u, . r '•f i •r— . 1 - Gka wA �� w! ', , 1 SME o • ii 0e 4'. Y!-" . _-rn"-, . .e.. CNH NO.19003 j� DATE: 05/06/19 $9,111 sf) •r . REVISIONS'. IP 6 s X a 1sU' , v 0U c m c f e cz c s N w 0 3 A T C A RAIn�1S. .taxa Sae%an-South Building SF Edited by I! Planning Staffir— iEiiiii "'^TM's` '— Urrnrrw�.e,. O NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION N:\0007379.00\dwg\Civil\Exhibit\Wayzata Country Club-Site Aerial Exhibit.dwg,7/17/2019 5:06:25 PM,DWG To PDF-WPS.pc3 S ijd, 111 1731TaVO:r3;:.T3.19A7Z:di,/135 uns 33 1313 1.[131.33.03/ yNJ -gN NW gazAeMi 11111111m... aoueualuievi m 1-0Z0 o, 4nia AJluno3 elezA(eM N z P .. U jYD F— X� JI!Ii z o 9<13 <7� -W?§ g H i§ s v8'" 1411 'i'9 ZO , i 1 I 11___Ed 0 F, J W E VI T n . . 4 , vi a ..... .3 o ou_ j — v 0 4 . 3 O O _ 2 -+ v y o k o r m ' 1111 N r a' _ h oe y ":# L of 73 1 a z 0 UN T N .0 tx W 7 U ,. Ol 3 v 0 Ari r m r 0 0 -- z AttBr30.11.11,1310141.01.1...” avi-to hss3 on,Riss.A3110 31.0/ro5311ns na.Kiln SUR oott 111227 ^,°2 §:-.-- - F,R LIaoueue1....1.1.+011,10 0E6 pevi 8 J100—gni°fulunoo elezAem 11. 90S0 _1 .., I 2 . c. "(.-•••..• (0 -'.., . . ..i. ,(..) ,4 , .• '.. . , . v) .. . •• • s , 4.,: • \i , , , ) '.. V) O . 3 .c 77) 5 o o cu cn -= C 0 Z 0 O C _1 '. • o lik • ' o i. <) c 1 c •c 0 i 0 . . . • C C ! 0 • .5 . ,.•• . C ..... • • co , -5 ,,,,-.‘,,4-•:.:;.....:,:t 0 . .5 i 0 c ',i`l,.•••::'.. MI ....i (u • .j"i". C .'•,W ' •• . . , 1 ..'C' . co .SS : 8 (7) - 2 •'.•`'4'1"'" .'• -6 • . .7, CO ''`-•''L',' (3 , . . , , . • ccee-L,r t.s,cros,...ATIVA316,1..ns 13.15.1.153.0C1 LIZZ7 g ?: 6 :i aoueualupin <2 90S0 qnio Ailunoo eiezAem 3F, ! , . - itaillill miff,:14j42 r< • 4di MIMI 1..YAliaN CO D irt4°t ° 11-g-661141ATI=IATI4 w 11111- i 1. IL H=Iiia La. IlimiHiliiim :-(15 1p111 1:011-1,Prfiff .„. ,- 6ml-- Ifl ,[1 fr-1 Alli. iii I'M 1:1;:g1,71.11.Ali . i s_ ilifr.-agAilap " , 111011i;VigE4 . ..01_,, -1 ikigil,01,1=4. TD) C ,E3 r 411111fiiill'167 .11 f co o ii mmi -1'ZI;EYAI: ro miL,,LI II—!7....-A.,. a.> lieeff°4010146051 0 IT[--1- ''42-r'll!' Fa iveilli„,•icalm EThr,555- M . - TD 11P, On ilit:77 _Air& =i'Lli.ii(f. - ! i =.1..:.,,n,,,, di =,i--,.3:1 114_711124 14 5-5,4:.-ta =111=111,-4 - Jil,:h,17 1 .11-ril-ir-7-: MI* :5-:.-5.7111,--11141 - AI 111;;VIitrirti_17 -r-i161.111114.111.b.1,12m gP.j'-.TT;z7.41T-1:- -.',T.1:', II 1.1•4.,,,':::: :::v...o.tili Mb.411114114•N r e ifiq._"".Ti"::',',1':'_,-.1.12 I -Atli 1 I 1 ,..:1,,,-.:iy, ANFP—ww1I'.1117,----111-=w, :i!,fiaPpit, 45.4. '14i- -IVA-11Y-tigg -0 -C .z iTllQ, -'Y ii ,*fdiV1§x!15i:" n111111E--.1H.-11.i_-1l--1i:s7I--I—11---i1t1r1—=1a-1—,..I.E,E, 1--,11Hrri .,..., I ry_::,---iI- 1111111E1 `: 11,1,- , a) II-aivz4I1=-IH HI I ...... 17 ,,;_111-7,117117:7111111111:1:'-'111'::!,!f:7Itill1,71E1111-1:IEFI IIILT—li1i1111.1111m=1:=H—=j1 1 11:1=177-11JILI.'11:11171:' ril=!''''±'11;';'11. 41117-1--igT' Hil-ii ! IIILEMETE E , "IH ILTriA -: millz-E11:4117,7111 ‘ _ - 111=111 01n,-, I 1 1E-11 HI Z' 5 -1-1i7,11kite 1=11111=1111F- .E. 1- Niiw.15zATJE-a H '221 ft.,---LJJ-T7 - it. Jr=11:71 J-M H1141,511 c, '&1115,111=111=111 1,,t,i=Ai-- . a: 47:1=11HIF.--111:-Ellwm,411.,.-41,. -.,5 Irzifr11-.1-11141ifiVi 1 41, ,,,c, g- g':...1:11,,,,HI 1 Eil 1 Li;.'.'..:,•.V T_Illift±414,41' , sID . . . , l)H�. s<'.a>���ass„sK�.„„<.3,�.,«3���,�3e.s�u„�s3Ma« AIA/3 --evo -n NW.1..,/, c _ s eoueua}uieW s 1.0E0o qnl�ti}uno3 e}ez(eM�, s e z s O ., U X- 1131iii.' ) Ei1 (/)1—i: i 'ii Z _pzc3 =i3 od kfY x I o 8 w ?i o d a° $ w EAI O W 8 00 1 e O 2 Z�I I I I c„.g ;3 ► b z F' ' 1 ►\ 111111 z 1 i s vv 1111 � „ 2.___ / s / qs/ 1, t ► Il \ 1 1 I 1 II Sg 1§3° / / 1 0� gays /fr if /, //ll, /' 1 \t I I P. o°g ., J� / , �e aa�g i/ ' ge wa // ,;`.,N.,, N+y I, \'. t \' W 8 8 z 2°8 8.3 t � 7 +wdC � �� ops a <w / yaw r r„ ‘:2444.),,-,•., d \ /r l �... `\ \a 1 1 \ , !i °'8<;,o? "fr: / �' ;i,-'' Ir a� x io_t z / / \ \ g •gaz :1,M;a w f6 I �g ° o :ft.- W - • ,t V 1 I I , g am .1=8 g5q. iso U w W \ `eF Www Sys€w9b // 3 / Qa .66.6, s _s„. w CD w w_ &xt \ 18,8 ._J h. !— ✓� ,�� s 0 a zE zi .8 -1''‘,” si sx88 ; -- /1 a€m _ W in�F 3? , ......T• •ssj�� ' e grg / \\ * /_I" .i.,:;trs — § I j 6 1 1 aim's s !g!; 03i g :ii: 5 %,.\ \\ \k‘ \` �_v.).........,_.. ..,4,,,,,,.„ , , ,„..‘„,14, ,, -_...""'a1,mtaetdSS \`.,'"` qIt.),--"''''''''''‘<07421 ' "a*ew� L% `a ' CZ E N I1 6 9 r g h b a ♦ vva�"eII�#14,,,, a 4 3 Z 2 5.. .,m a c \ vee -"'w, �.• v..vwa�vai � O 5 g g m d"b< all easicew,ttcauvanxui t �. i°o,< 7_ •: .,f 33 ‘ \ , ,, \, : --::__,_ -- ---_,_ ji ► =0 W n d sg a/ s €,em\ 3 88oma s - -j` I $, Q ',<2;'..,s °& ,i / . <: y ' $E n., / '' 4 3 1 1 I A h 3 22 82 i,dm= � . s�V - gi "..3'''' 1 L ________ __ ,... ‘ SITE LEGEND _ ., • .--- EXISTING PROPOSED /.771,1‘,EE' ,... PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE E 1,1 K,- CURB AND GUTTER - §i _ - - ---1 Tral - •••••••••••••••••••• TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTER _ —- POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL '47',.?, DNR Lupe One, — __ / , _------ , TY A,'CONCRETE PAVEMENT , ' -• [ I CONCRETE SIDEWALK .1 E _4 - • _------- 1.- 1--- Ma HEAVE DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 r'l NORMAL DUBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ' _ 44 0 NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS 1,1 - _ g 4 0 . .__ - 0 TRANSFORMER i BliI.1 XN0.A;TVEM EN T * SITE LIGHENG 0 DG W S'1 . , Ea- TRAFFIC SIGN 0 EE OF BITUMINOUS MATCH EXISTING LIIIh POWER ROLE ______ PAVEMENT -44, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT , ', BOLURD 7 POST .... ..............•••• y. GENERAL SITE NOTES - -1 sufami_t_i_t_ttitc-T--------------- PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ' PAVEMENT , -i 4 Block , _ ''..;,. , 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PRONDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOS,.BINMINOUS j E LOUTONS AND ELEVATIONS Of lEISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND DELITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PAVSEENT „ _.._, RAN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY' ....--E„ LOCAIIONS PRIOR TO ENCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND TIE ii `-„,-- ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY MATCH FASTING AC\ GRAVEL All ' / 3 REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS DIMENSIONS AND AREAS ..B y -• . i 4 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EDGE OF BINMINOUS EDGE OT GRAVEL OR IETERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PROPOSED gj ; A : C . BINMINOUS \ 5 REFER TO ARCIETECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF 4 PAVEMENT .-i.74..-4,. A.---„..... EDGE OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT \ •/ A ACOANPA1AD'ir ADADA,ITEAS ASVHA:MAROLMAVAVAVIIAZASTN'S A.tn=n=c— ,g 5 AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY PLACEMENT OF 1,..q.,µs „..,...,._, THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY PE CIE,AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PULDEENT -;,,e, ..... TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOTSTANDARDS ,. „ t.—. • -'1'...„ ,'..' 7 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNCAL ENGINEER CNH NO 19003 '?. New Building , ..............,,.. * -- 8 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO AD/ACENT PROPERTIES DIJRING 1 DATE 07/17/19 CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPER,DAMAGE TO REVISIONS (9,111 sf) ',-4' - ADJACENT PROPERPES Summit Station ; , -- Block 1,Lot 2 . * -- 9 SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED 81"OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ,' , • EXISTING ZONING RE FE OTE OEAOEA50 F A50 CUE n / • PROPOSED ZONING * FUELING STATION „..... / • PARCEL DESCRIPRON RIDE 11E2E1200.136 8 AC) /, / 11/32.30001 139 7 AC) .,,, / 1182334000E 11 0 AC, * • / • PROPERTY AREA 77 S AC 13 PID,ONLY, 41 ''''''''''1'3 1' '14 3 '--- r:4:44tr"Ne' / • EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACMATIO, I El AC IS 1E1 X . , ....„.............,\ ., / .,..' • VAIST/NG IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SOUTH 1.1101 067 AC 10 11691.1 • ,,,,,\\_ * 4 /' ,,,, • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE S1.410E1101 0 631 AC 10 B31.1 * // / South Impervious Decrease of 001AL -0 = TRANSFORMER / /// • IDESTING IMFERMOUS SURFACE NORTH(RAP°, 0 37 AC 10 am) • , • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 110R TH IRATIO,0 SSAC 10 71E, E5 7 PATIO 7 / // North Imperylous Increass of 0 E AC _,,,..s RETAINING WALL * / / • BU/LDING GROSS SIZE 3 „,_. C / / North Cdd Storage B000 SF / / South Maintenance Facility 9 111SF 0 0 o(1) * // // • BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE SOEADIACENT RESIDENTIAL 0 C / / • PROPOSED SETBACKS 10 Y SIDE YARD E 2 71•DNR SETBACK / • PARKING PROVIDED 47 SPACES MM. P4 (1) SumMit Station / / S UT AT AS ,..., n •cTi gl F Blocll,Lot 6 / / /f Ma Plan-South' , Westvvood , ,.:- ,,::= ..... ,, - t • c ED \2 , /,' , ,/ • x— / t.i. c)\I z • , , -” NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION llIl eno 5:(.);1111! .. ;�,'e«''.'"",� 1� 3ss r„e3M , yNJ ar worwax Truro 2,F NW.e.,,,,, z _ s aoueuajuieL = z�Z� s” p grin Ajuno°e1ez(eM A i e z ii k� jF I 5 ii __$ 0 aiJ _ Ey 42 33 0 31eii O o W u2 i sh. aEa pi Y Z g W F W oo A' i aoC EoS $� r, o F w E$ $ 8 8g' Di 3D 3 3 a I— / g o a N A m fl _ 3 z " s • 4s. �o e ca i , — , , ,.,. \ r Q' I \ a - I. hi J �. , :,,,,,,o w s N ,w n.z e • aoueua;ulew M ��£� qnio ti;uno3 a;eziceM ,111 z O a f € ® A HF-Z ` CC _; 8 - a x 0 s `i („) ?;ag3Sz uR! .8 = 2I— e 3 id 2 Q 8 r i l z W ' I'IIIII Il f , e Z I 5 \ !� \\\ 1A V A 1 ( V V A �11!�! ,1 \ mw s l I 1 - A: ��f\ I`‘ v 3g 7oaig`s y ��. � �_� =gg§ \ 1 -' k � Ym mw q �s qac �„ °� � jl,\: \� \4i vvvv I SN A ;S= Y ICF, .\ J Y a E \ \ A ' AI ogo g=a`e°ww ' t I .,' \\ \ \ ‘k\\\\ x of 8$ awo �` o 'VIA • ° '"_` °� °� 41,11P it ._._ W4 W„�o W p A gio I % IC „,,k 2E2 m\ s wNy MI K M v I--- ' � t"� 3 \\,, ( :die o 4W 8 v a a < o - W a`Z f p a ` oI 00m s- 1 .- a1 $ , LL spm ma ° € a o .1,142 ,'2g,';, ,,,:,„\,,, x ni8a 8og oow-1. :41 s ° L•\( IL \ ( .`' 1\ ,� ��' � �� ��, ao w= 3g g iAA � _ V ''� � A i I izgm '\ ' 't 1 ''‘ ` 1\1- , g 8 ) / g' a< 3mT. '\ I \ \ � iI .4w � i\ \ - i ivII # w =w 8\ ( 1 � ' 1 i 17�) !'a: o ! a °1 \ 4II1 �� \`.' ; I ,1/.,'1, W 2gg wfa 1 4�\ � III � / I 11 I `k I 1 � av \ \ zmae2 4\,,k,..-,;„..-14,o\,,,\ A A r Ds �°gy ° 43F w � \ a g <P43 � geg 82d .C1 Ili tl.,,..,, T NW ne=eM • o aoueualuleW m 1,0£O qnl°tilunoo elezAeM 5_ g e p U a w z ia�z‘$5` -o gra1 0o k o 1 z 1 g z i =A t E o s ., e3 � 'u� g53S_ �a EQ $ W i,1I 0 Ell ]l , ii III $ t o ' Ili\ II I I I � / u z t a . " 0 I , , ; '1 ; //// ,, /\‘‘\,0,,\ ,'.. ','', / 111 / 1: 1 / 11 H P PJ \ � \, q ,2,•,6g; / / ii/ lh \ 0 Sao /I / I t t t ,,`Pg 51hi �1 P. �' �/ / � i,tl 1,11 A ;�f 1 mss � � q /J / ���A �i ,E• s�'a�� �i :, / �_, �I! = ass / /•'l �;%"�um",.�,. t ° y' "aid VI i< w=: 1 /� %L- i" , \ \ ; =gig =a o I ':''C � i �11 ' Ino g t �� ' " aga� =e2= e N sg= m� w:o aa�- 1I ' •�ii I } \ W go mg'- gE 'It. v o ?' I 1- a' i g "sm• gag i7 W ie =soy U ago w 1 4 \ A gW Hg :q&ttq L7n! LA. / dp E afl �Fv asWW /� 3 L 1 " o;�s "a"_ °� I3 alt / A, I E 1 1 I ;o E; Fsw - 1 _ '0 ng r / F 3Eo„ F s a ;a —� a s c< \�� 'dli S laE` WE 2o= Ph a 8 zg �\\ `G / . •. -`i-� �” \ - $ - , J s.i I ! `i▪ m 3.'" o ' FF?i � \, \�\�� y `�M wa`w.vta��`\ : �.y`\° �gJ`N`�N`r�ca'a`t 3 ' Z I ¢EEb °r `sumo �<Wp \ \ `> � 4.4.'�er.,.tie�y 1.$71"a x' 1f �® a§€_ 3oEgg ;5 € oiw ,, .,„ \ ,r,, `�•. � Vis , =a Z =i \ �� A ' ' �'�' �g �z2m I ,E's t,.-1 ® ,141 q as 1 ... _ lit� Flo 1 tl" tTAg 6s / `� rs 8''',,E. -i..177- ,e �' I� I an P z s j 1 ... / '// ^: P ,.e t . 9g m�82 ab�< 'Zig_ Ssoww E' � ,4 as 1,,,YI t 080nn! K qgzo V % r✓ _ c ` I h g \ o\ Ft a bTm g S ot 4 \ ja i \ \ , , 1p� :e $ $ s ��AV 1 00 mc>eannxn a srrmrw Sls uers Fn is ¢x w. ,A, ,i"„o , H , mog^ g NW.1.Wzy eaueW 00i73 _ ._,,„e„b..:A,a11;F;g ,. i o' qnio N}unoa e;ezAeM fa $ g (I) O d. U GZV € �� i D CC a j1Y F W w• Fq 8 g' . 1 E g 3 i!W $ a u g 5°:c CC ° ::3 sass°3°F o oesoagu IA 1 0 81 Ili 111 !_. 1 III 1111 W ® ' = 81 R'.111' zy sw ow W� s g i Ls. = ;s°9 _ a°,- ` 9 p8a ' ;.§ - ' "i.).. oY Ai !_agOa Sa 3< 9994 59 g5a *9 �< Ln, <..Ws 4 =- ty £`g'ee, go=o foo s 6599 a .. „ m. F"� a .3T 9,% Wiz o� S W gZ _ 679 <' i4 < .-- o1' 69 a: W zp �5'gg W0' ON Fi g 3 <m�, iJ§ ::t i° 9,°g' b - W `a m 3mm w .q wa” 9g,�€ 'geg zz3 p.g ao ;. g30r18 � ° , <g s Wg "291,9 E� 3,0 92 s a a €lo: `:2 eg$' �i S4,,Id ociCa o?g 3 w” m�=w g so 544 a i2 w W58 - 2 ' yeg 15;3a `,ms f° �ggz !gas ? -gig a '' §a s - W !I.- ' a 958 p_Eq v3< - 4 g } 8v 'a��m a3�'<' °= m <, gi `' E s< m �3 a w,s Li5E �:-` _ ,, '7; w z < o¢ 5zo m oma; w �E az8= 6fgg< 1gyQ g,."= - V:F =� g$'; . X31 ° ..:9. u° -5-- = NW mfg.. z s po3w .. �r w ' 0 3 gg` ? o = x,oE o$Wpo s :T, ' "„3 g Ysa 3 "s< �'” 9<.2'� r7z „.o- 'Ll "§ :g . o saw 3V,4 s -9s s� q, z,a �s3 o� Quo s�4so 2pig 44 =gib opo 0,s 3.1€ b@si ! a4� W ;g -q ` VIE g2=o 2a me 5.4 B r �3=_<8 �a§r :28 'ib ''M. l'eff= g MtiA _ 2` gi. i a� ss:ee $ :oo = g, = NIg §oeo L F ,,,4 ppeg 4igi g — ,im - °r <m sg ig ire 'i q F" is=? goia is =`ate �db g gf i's..� F a�r�So i;s a W 2� Sg° 2a3 8 gg 3112 2 a. °" g$T g F2 3J g,m Roi G go g- R,m , dx'cs ado ng gg - gmz_ i 'E so L10 se6 '3zogzg 2 "" gz 7 ge<i >_ a� w ,Eggs"a <m� c e3`'.€ a$ «E A: O:o 3$53 <s9 =. 3g_ <'g sx9ee <m W _ 59,3, «<o A v--' \\ iQ7 LAS--�r: ■ • \ it ���,�. Q Q =— � •Y 11I\ Li,, �Q . Q ; / - ,,:w* ..:„.;,-.,; ...,_::, :,.:t.,,, QQ QQ 1 ;\A E--< \\ I11 -I d�3 \Q (�\ ��a F a428 _3 �/ Q ,Q „, ' '''lik. � -/ ., , w r/ ■ ` — \ p . QQ cc • a " If1 -.�\ . a Q n ,.1, is . -E'y i cao 1. 7 • ..,,,,,..„„, ...,_.._ „ „ k lc, t ', --- - ' , ,,v ,.,. , , ,..,,, ii ,.__. _ ■ Q _ ,......„vn CJ QQ/� QQ; (l�Q� jl - i ► i 1117 / '‘gB ,,,ZGQ ; / / K I lfi r \ Project Narrative WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB MAINTENANCE PROJECT =x. 110 g.l - 4 Background Wayzata Country Club (WCC) was built in 1956. The club provides its members with an 18-hole championship golf course, 6-hole short course, tennis, pool, trap shoot, driving range and social events. The current maintenance facility, located along the 14th hole (south site) and the 6th hole (north site), needs to be expanded as we are now using shipping containers to accommodate the equipment to maintain our golf course and facilities. Both facilities are functionally obsolete and need replacement. 1. North Site The current pre-engineered metal cold storage building is approximately 3,319 square feet, along with 647 square feet of storage containers, for a total of 3,966 square feet. WCC is proposing to replace it with a new 8,000 square foot pre-engineered metal cold storage building. The building will be used for cold storage only and will be unoccupied. The exterior of the cold storage building on the north site will be prefinished corrugated metal in dark green to blend in with the surrounding landscaping. The proposed new structure will be placed in roughly the same area as the existing structure and will be orientated such that the building will be parallel with the fairway on the 6th hole. This orientation allows for the building to be screened from the course and tree impacts are along the course and not along the adjacent single family homes to the west. The north side of the site will also be graded to define a gravel parking area for employees. An existing berm and landscaping will remain along the west side of the parking lot with the exception of a small area in the southwest corner to allow for the construction of the stormwater raingarden. The raingarden has been placed on the north side of the project as the north side increases the impervious surface at the course and the south side has a slight reduction of impervious surface. Due to the north site improvements being separated from the south by the Luce Line Trail, utility extensions will not be provided to the north. However the entire structure is within 250 feet of the fire hydrant proposed on the south site and the proposed cold storage building is not located within 60 feet of any other structures. We request an agricultural exemption because there will be no water or sewer connections to this building. 2. South Site The existing building along with the garage, storage containers, wash bay and chemical storage, occupy approximately 8,514 square feet on the south site. WCC is proposing to build a new building that will enclose the wash bay and chemical storage, along with a break room, locker room, repair shop, equipment storage and maintenance office. The building is to be located 10 feet from our west property line to provide screening and noise mitigation from the residential neighborhood to the west. The site is constrained by the 14th hole fairway, creating a practical difficulty for the project. The exterior of the golf maintenance building on the south site includes architectural metal panels with clean lines. The architectural metal panels will be dark green to blend in with the surrounding landscaping. The main entry at the southwest corner is highlighted with a prefinished metal canopy. Similar to the north side of the site, the proposed structures and associated bituminous driveways and parking stalls will be located within the existing footprint of the facility. However, the south improvements reduce the impervious surface. This reduction of impervious was due to having the ability to lay out an efficient site plan and to better utilize the space available. Grading of the site will be limited and disruption to the existing landscaping will be kept minimal. Additional landscaping may be added on an as needed basis to provide screening or site enhancements once the building is constructed. The existing site is currently being served by an existing well and septic system. WCC is proposing to extend water from the north side of the club house to the new building. This water service may also be extended to the east to serve the existing oasis structure. The proposed new maintenance building will also have a grinder station to pump the sanitary sewer out to the existing gravity sewer in Old Long Lake Road. The utilities being proposed will primarily be directionally bored to limit the amount of disturbance and disruption to the course. WCC has a summer staff of approximately 38 working from this facility. We are proposing 47 new parking stalls to accommodate the staff. The parking stalls for employees will primarily be on the north side of the trail with overflow parking on the south side. The remaining stalls will be available for visitors. 3. Neighborhood Involvement We originally planned as a 15,000 square foot, 2-story building, but with the neighbors' input the project was redesigned to build a 9,111 square foot, single-story structure with a height of 18 feet on the east side and 14 feet on the west side. The west wall also serves as a retaining wall to minimize height of the exposed building to around 7 feet. The access doors are located on the north and east walls to minimize the noise as the staff prepares the golf course for play each day. Summary Wayzata Country Club has worked closely with the neighbors and has incorporated their feedback in the building location, design and layout. The practical difficulties of placing this building on the site require a side yard setback variance for the south site and will require a setback variance from the DNR Luce Line trail. L10,4103 1VIIRA1911S A±10 „ „ . . , , • , 111 --1. CO =,.1c131,NNN.1.114d-,1.1d WS le.1.0B , ....=,*; N) , 2 g :,..—..: ......,....Z.7..."==-72.7.:--:.:= 1=14 NMcl NNNN=1.10,1 I-N1Nd WS ---. .......__-__,..,.._,,,,,t,...",.... ..„=: .....= Q) a) --------"=LF,Er...' -..iFi-!=z, .......... — ,, o 5•-< • i ro 'CU 1 _ .......,_ _ .. ..__ .._,__ ..... _. .... A m o timismenvo= ...' „ , ., ., ., ., ., - -, - - - -- - ''.A--.1iiu. ' H i 1 1 :'1 i , I 4 . . „ ... - -, - -, - •• •° ''' "` E o -..7.-,- .• 7•-• ".--7."n T. -----,-cr 041301.10/0114=4(1,104 AM,LYNG TIMM 1 2 1 ' ''' '' " '‘I: : * : : : " Al=== " ..,.,.... •• ,,, ,"",,• , •• -• -• "° ' ' I"` I" ,,", .III'''': "'",`'''''Ch. L I I I ' ii I 1 . . . , ., „ , ., A I : ., —, , „ .• •• •• •• •-• • ' "' I"I-,---"*.'77.' ''''..""t''''',.".''I,',I. .0 01 -II LETA C : ..' 2 2 ••••••• • ••••••••••• ..,..... -'—'-'' si..'•7' ' ""-r-' ''•:7.. '''' ','.' ''''''''T,r4 '-e 7.. ' :-- -.7, SNOISIA3N -. , - '".‘4'..2=L-L .:.- 0-.4'' ---- - — - - • • • „ „ 27, 1•715 s•PeS'a "AO , SNLNLO ILVO = COM ON MO __-- ——, ,..... . ',- ' EME:=, • ..........z...:"........ 1 .-.Ii ,I4'"!..".7.• ---- cr,2,2,• g "i " '' :7 : : : '•••: -;'.;4:.4, !!4 i l• 1! '„'*.•,,,,;•;,,,'•',•,,444•k•A - - - -'1 '' — - - " " "' -- " - " `` " " ._.7,7, 7. :1 .7.:::: ..=: .. . : : . , i-n.i',;•,; • 2 p, i 'V I! ,.r :,"•-"--,-ir"' 55 IMO 81! - - .k..„ ! 1 ., 1!tt F t I i 'It, ,,----7-,,,-7,'71- '' - I =,,-., ., ., .., .., ., L.,:::,,7-:-., .,,,•-• ‘! .1-, !ti F 1 I ! i,1- ‘ t,'-',',:t.t, --r'1•4-1. '— "'' ''' ' '` - - - "° - - - - - " - - " " " - „,-.1 ••-.‘ "I: 7-s...,==;.:17% =r 4rn 77 -, ..,/., -,—,;!_„,;,..., !,1 ; ‘! ; .,, ... -••• g • ,” - ' " g I4, " " " " " .I.' " " " " " " -‘ " " " " . ..... ---"-- .._, ..7.. .z;z...._ i. .. .. - - . - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - -.....-===:. .......... .., ...... -1- 17-='11:* z-,,,. 1,0 " _ in ........ —7..j L•ms' •s-a 7 i ....;.tft . . . . . , , I 490 Old Long Lake Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 July 29, 2019 Hon. Dennis Walsh and Members of the City Council City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55323 RE: Proposed Modifications to Wayzata Country Club Maintenance Facilities Dear Mayor Walsh and City Council Members, I am writing on behalf of the Summit Station Homeowners Association in connection with the proposed modifications to the Wayzata Country Club's maintenance facility. I wanted to let you know that I and the other homeowners in the Association are in support of the project as proposed. We also arc appreciative for the ongoing outreach from Chris Gerardi and his team at the Wayzata Country Club, as well as WCC committee chair Kent Carlson, who have done a great job of keeping us informed regarding the project and soliciting our feedback as it has progressed. Sin rely, alvin Litsey President, Summit Station Homeowners Association July 24,2019 Orono City Council 2780 Kelley Parkway Orono,MN 55356 Dear Mayor Walsh and Members of the City Council, My wife and I reside at 280 Wakefield Road. Our property borders the Wayzata Country Club. Today,my wife and I met with Mr.Chris Gerardi Wayzata Country Club manager and Mr.Kent Carlson,a Club member. Mr.Carlson reviewed the proposed changes to the club's maintenance facilities. In our opinion,the changes represent an improvement to the operations efficiency and reduce the visibility of the operations to the neighbors. Wayzata Country Club has been our neighbor since we moved to Orono 19 years ago. They have been great neighbors. We wholeheartedly support their plan. Sincerely, Thomas J.Batin RECEIVED AUG 12 2019 CITY OF ORONO RUN DATE:07/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 36-118-23 13 0002 38 36-118-23 24 0003 38 36-118-23 34 0002 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB WILLIAM HENDERSON IV WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 430 WAKEFIELD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB WILLIAM HENDERSON IV WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD W 430 WAKEFIELD RD 200 WAYZATA BLVD W WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 13 0003 38 36-118-23 24 0007 38 36-118-23 34 0008 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB CORTNEY WAYNE LENEAVE REV TR SUMMIT STATION HMOWNRS ASSOC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB WAYNE LENEAVE SUMMIT STATION HMOWNRS ASSOC 200 WATZATA BLVD W 360 WAKEFIELD RD ATTN TRACY HOREJSI WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 440 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391-9681 38 36-118-23 13 0005 38 36-118-23 31 0005 38 36-118-23 34 0009 PATRICIA A SPENCER REV TRUST H NORMAN NAFSTAD ET AL SUMMIT STATION HMOWNRS ASSOC 503 FERNDALE RD N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 PATRICIA A SPENCER SUMMIT STATION HOMEOWNERS SUMMIT STATION HMOWNRS ASSOC 42488 N 108TH STREET ATTN CINDY AND MIKE LEJEUNE ATTN TRACY HOREJSI SCOTTADALE AZ 85262 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD 440 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391-9681 38 36-118-23 13 0006 38 36-118-23 310006 38 36-118-23 34 0010 E J BIERMAN&N K BIERMAN STATE OF MINN C L LITSEY&C A LITSEY 505 FERNDALE RD N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 490 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 EDWARD J&NANCY K BIERMAN DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT CALVIN L LITSEY 505 FERNDALE RD N ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN CHRISTINE A LITSEY WAYZATA MN 55391 500 LAFAYETTE RD 490 OLD LONG LAKE RD ST PAUL MN 55155 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 13 0007 38 36-118-23 310011 38 36-118-23 34 0011 SHERRY G PATTERSON TRUST ELEANOR L FERRIL REV TRUST M&C LEJEUNE 507 FERNDALE RD N 240 WAKEFIELD RD 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SHERRY G PATTERSON ELEANOR L FERRIL MICHAEL L LEJEUNE 507 FERNDALE RD N JOHN D FERRIL 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 240 WAKEFIELD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 36-118-23 13 0010 38 36-118-23 310012 38 36-118-23 34 0012 SHERRY G PATTERSON TRUST VIRGINIA KAY CRAVEN R E GLESSING&I J GLESSING 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 250 WAKEFIELD RD 470 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SHERRY G PATTERSON VIRGINIA KAY CRAVEN ROLLAND E GLESSING 507 FERNDALE RD N 250 WAKEFIELD RD I JEAN GLESSING WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 470 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 13 0011 38 36-118-23 31 0013 38 36-118-23 34 0013 G F SUTTON&K M SUTTON T J BATINA&K S BATINA H NORMAN NAFSTAD TRUST 509 FERNDALE RD N 280 WAKEFIELD RD 460 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 GEORGE F&KATHY W SUTTON THOMAS J/KATHERINE S BATINA H NORMAN NAFSTAD 509 FERNDALE RD N 280 WAKEFIELD RD C/O GREGG NAFSTAD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 3435 N KILMER LA PLYMOUTH MN 55441 38 36-118-23 13 0012 38 36-118-23 31 0014 38 36-118-23 34 0014 MARK CAPECE&BARBARA CAPECE M R CIBUZAR&R L CIBUZAR C J POLICINSKI ET AL 511 FERNDALE RD N 320 WAKEFIELD RD 450 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARK CAPECE&BARBARA CAPECE MARK R CIBUZAR CHRISTOPHER POLICINSKI 511 FERNDALE RD N REBEKAH L CIBUZAR ANNE M POLICINSKI WAYZATA MN 55391 320 WAKEFIELD RD 450 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 14 0015 38 36-118-23 31 0015 38 36-118-23 34 0015 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB C WAYNE LENEAVE T A LEONARD&T C HOREJSI 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 360 WAKEFIELD RD 440 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB C WAYNE LENEAVE THOMAS A LEONARD 200 WAYZATA BLVD W 360 WAKEFIELD RD 440 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 23 0002 38 36-118-23 310016 38 36-118-23 410012 STATE OF MINNESOTA C WAYNE LENEAVE J D JAMSA&M N JAMSA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 113 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT C WAYNE LENEAVE JONATHAN&MARTHA JAMSA ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN 360 WAKEFIELD RD 113 CHEVY CHASE DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PAUL MN 55155 RUN DATE:07/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 36-118-23 410013 38 36-118-23 41 0023 38 36-118-23 41 0043 AMY SCHUETT ROBERT B HOWE ETAL HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 115 CHEVY CHASE DR 135 CHEVY CHASE DR 136 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 AMY SCHUETT ROBERT B HOWE MD CITY OF ORONO 115 CHEVY CHASE DR 135 CHEVY CHASE DR P O BOX 66 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 36-118-23 41 0014 38 36-118-23 410024 38 36-118-23 41 0044 ALAN J&CAROL K ARTHUR C I&C SATTERVALL MICHAEL&KATIE SIMPSON 117 CHEVY CHASE DR 137 CHEVY CHASE DR 142 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ALAN J&CAROL K ARTHUR CHERYL I&CRAIG SATTERVALL MICHAEL&KATIE SIMPSON 117 CHEVY CHASE DR 137 CHEVY CHASE DR 142 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 41 0015 38 36-118-23 410035 38 36-118-23 41 0045 T W FORSTER&B J FORSTER C MCLEAN&E A MCLEAN S ANDERSON&K ANDERSON 119 CHEVY CHASE DR 114 CHEVY CHASE DR 146 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 THOMAS FORSTER CHRISTOPHER/ELIZABETH MCLEAN STEPHEN&RETA ANDERSON 119 CHEVY CHASE DR 114 CHEVY CHASE DR 146 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 41 0016 38 36-118-23 41 0036 38 36-118-23 410046 LOUIS B OBERHAUSER CHAD K OLSON K E HIGGINS&L W HIGGINS 121 CHEVY CHASE DR 116 CHEVY CHASE DR 110 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 LOUIS B OBERHAUSER JR CHAD K OLSON KENNETH&LAURA HIGGINS 121 CHEVY CHASE DR 116 CHEVY CHASE DR 110 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 41 0017 38 36-118-23 410037 38 36-118-23 42 0003 R E STRAUMAN&K E STRAUMAN THOMAS B CASWELL JR&WIFE WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 123 CHEVY CHASE DR 120 CHEVY CHASE DR 430 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 R E STRAUMAN&K E STRAUMAN THOMAS B CASWELL WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 123 CHEVY CHASE DR 120 CHEVY CHASE DR 200 WAYZATA BLVD W WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 410018 38 36-118-23 410038 38 36-118-23 43 0001 R MCCLANAHAN/K T MCCLANAHAN CHEVY CHASE LLC WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 125 CHEVY CHASE DR 122 CHEVY CHASE DR 200 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT B MCCLANAHAN CHEVY CHASE LLC WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB KRISTIN T MCCLANAHAN 575 FERNDALE RD N 200 WAYZATA BLVD W 125 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 410019 38 36-118-23 41 0039 38 36-118-23 44 0004 JEFFREY G JACOBSEN C1 DENZIN&R L DENZIN STATE OF MINN 127 CHEVY CHASE DR 124 CHEVY CHASE DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JEFFREY&ELIZABETH JACOBSEN CHRISTIAN J DENZIN DNR REAL ESTATE MGMT 127 CHEVY CHASE DR S REBECCA L DEZIN ATTN DEBBIE GURTIN WAYZATA MN 55391 124 CHEVY CHASE DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 36-118-23 41 0020 38 36-118-23 41 0040 38 36-118-23 44 0023 D M SAHLSTROM/J E SAHLSTROM PATRICK JOHN WATZ WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 129 CHEVY CHASE DR 126 CHEVY CHASE DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 DAVID M&JEAN E SAHLSTROM PATRICK JOHN WATZ WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 129 CHEVY CHASE DR MEADOW VIEW LANE 200 WAYZATA BLVD W WAYZATA MN 55391 126 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 410021 38 36-118-23 410041 P D MOYNEUR&L W MOYNEUR T C NELSON&J M NELSON 131 CHEVY CHASE DR 128 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PATRICK&LEAH MOYNEUR TODD C&JANA M NELSON 131 CHEVY CHASE DR 128 CHEVY CHASE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 410022 38 36-118-23 410042 DONALD POTTER/SHARON POTTER CITY OF ORONO 133 CHEVY CHASE DR 132 CHEVY CHASE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DONALD LEE POTTER CITY OF ORONO SHARON POTTER P O BOX 66 133 CHEVY CHASE DR CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/18/2019 �T ', g4 `,�+,,,{,,r .- y , 41�0 syq,;t# 4544 ,s'':g tti � i �a ,spy °�tf c ,� t 3 '� `#X. k* v .. g 0 A7.170440;:'1'e.7W 41/14111.1 1 1 : Iir wilt ibriii.,,.. ,, +■r.rr II' NNW ' ,.s ., . Oki. -,_______ki,‘, r ,•,, . ' I I I I I I I.11 I I I 11#„,1 I I I I I/. . .„,..............,.......„ , , . INP110 3d\ 2. -- , ilrlIP \41\1 +...") h� g Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I i i i I i i i J 430 Old Long Lake Rd This data (i) s furnished 'AS IS with mrepresentation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is fumshedwith nowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable fsr legal,engineering a surveying purposes.Hennepin Countyshat not be liable for any damage,injury a loss resulting frau this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office co36th Street South,M nn ea pd s,MN 55487/g s.i nfo@hennepi n.us Date Application Received: 07/24/2019 O�T Date Application Considered as Complete:07/24/2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/22/2019 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator •kEsHO�`�` From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: 19 August 2019 Subject: #LA19-000058,West Bay Homes Rick Vogelsand. 1080 Heritage Lane Public Hearing: IUP—Export 500+ cubic yards of material Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an interim use permit to export approximately 5,500 cubic yards of material in preparation for construction of a new residence. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background A new home is being designed for permit at 1080 Heritage Lane.The project will involve the export of approximately 5,500 cubic yards of material from the site to accommodate the proposed home foundation and lot excavations due to the substantial slopeof the vacant lot; an interim use permit (IUP) is required.They applicant is prosing the haul the material down heritage and county road 15 out of Orono city limits. Section 78-330- Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 43,964 s.f.± (1 acre) ±245' Applicable Regulations: Interim Use Permit (Code Section 78-1726(a)(6)) The construction of the new home will result in roughly 5,500 cubic yards of unneeded material. The applicant proposes to export this from the site out of the city. The proposed home will not be out of character with the neighborhood. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit (Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; the proposed grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. FILE#LA19-000040 17 June 2019 Page 2 of 3 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district; grading and export of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed material removals will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use,the grades, or enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, activity of exporting approximately 5,500 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust, vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the builder and owner will be responsible for keeping debris off of the roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions. The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Interim Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the proposed plan conforms to the standards of IUP review. The material removal activity will be tied to the building permit for the new residence; or a separate, administrative land alteration permit will be required. Engineer Comments The applicant is proposing to remove excess material from the site. The City Engineer will review the grading plan at the time of the building permit. FILE#LA19-000040 17 June 2019 Page 3 of 3 Public Comments No Public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the IUP, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested IUP? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval with the IUP in accordance with the City Engineer's requirements associated with the overall building permit. Staff recommends the applicant should provide photo documentation of the condition of the City's roads on the route prior to hauling; repair to any damaged roadway will be the responsibility of the contractor. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Existing & Proposed Survey Exhibit C. Haul Route Exhibit D. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 07/24/2019 Address: 1080 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1011723130007 Land Use Number: LA19-000058 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: GOLDEN EMPIRE LLC Address: 1330 JERSEY AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 Applicant: Name: Rick Vogelsang Company: West Bay Homes Corp. Address: 10425 Bluff Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55347- westbayhomes@hotmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Rick Vogelsang westbayhomes@hotmail.com Associated Contact: Dave Pemberton pemberton@sathre.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: new construction at 1080 Heritage Lane Orono/exceeding 500cu yards fill removal Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application ❑ Appeal of Admin Decision ❑ Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Application ❑ Subdivision Application El Subdivision Exception ❑ Vacation Application ❑ Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: file:///or-mail/...18-000091%20thru/LA19-000058%20(1080%20Heritage%20Lane)%20IUP/Land%20Use%20App1ication%20Summary.htm[8/15/2019 3:22:28 PM] E ___.... ....... - --„ ,,,,,, .. .. .... .. . . .. . .. - !, \ Alaas -`sss -'s$IDIMALIMIL DULOA1"a s 88 a 5 q d a d 2 m;m a s,. ..m A m r g e n N m m X e e m ,", m AVW 1. 1A /14aaill4g4T4P0ha a85md a1 % �= dg5 � 3 m < < � AeFAl 1i1 ' .I I I w <a< m m<< e W o i s W E a --w r - i gW b tl }E a® "le"— A f- ,ado' v6 i < < i<i i i<7 3 7 3 e 7§ m i< i 3 3 3 a <a i 3 3 Z i S- W mmmAmm'AMP,<.< . s .<.W .mmmm�� mmsmme3m2m2m,. ,. P w - 'I , Iltlll'I I�il % c� a o 0 gy a E n W YS °6 ��ik O m > ai�1° ,' %r a �^ A:Wixx ilk l e1 7 £=4t3' �� >3F U i F JB1,1181811,1188]4,]]]:E LI OLI IB _ W111_ I n gg GKK Il asci ,, edv®E7eo1)e.o CASK, ..®®.a•mespe®1® < i 1 1 1 ,1 3 1 u 1 v 3 3 3 3 3 3 i i i a ` L ' E . V M 8 N < m i.//; E346� i 8 w< . . ., '��$$``x<$f f W z`a`x`z` �65���`�����y`gep"a�BB�IMi�iyig �� A 8;3 a m 8 a 8 m m m P s a o o 8 o 8 s 8 s s..., .......... 5 g n r 8 8 5 5 8 8 " ia61%%z 53edd� aG 2Oa33A11j 00"xxx.4401mooe6eone4 J®®.®oes.e E < m I Z O 6 888 g B IL IIuIJ3S I uJ ] :ii COW � ti •71 oz "e P. m �P Yc'cm %mss I: % vm=l550: sa66aoaa566 '11.7: Z, m<f 1 3 g 11 a 1<1 3 3 3 7 m m a a I i a a "i i<a a 2 i i<2 8 2 3 3 3 1$1 4 4 i "g_ ra..E3V4gE mANn.7, 8ea : :: mSm ,.,.,.gr1erRg,.mmmmamm og IIM Ms 'ss""s'asIas s� aaaaaa4 - aaaaaas;aaaa ab I, C .> ,<. � m3 mmmm _ m mmttil h Qo. . . . me. , ,. . . � . m. . . — iii ,i._y t41 % a '! ma a < ? j 1 f na % u m m m % , ' a`WWt "-- =' i-- 3t " = c 01 \''' ';r c�'7 `- # � < E33 awww33Wim1333m_W3W33< <3< << < < < < < 3< < Y 53 '' , -E -,.,< .m,-m o rr 4r mmmmm mme< '4 Y � ,o1 iil // \1`11 �` <te°t I I '\'a i1'�\1\I I� F-s r$ ` i f F 's S '`',/ 11i 4,4„ t. d V Z i' € s f r t j3 ! k p '1>;'-'" II:1 tigiA1°‘0 \ ;.\ __ -� a +1 vi- abs \get\\< , s : ‘7, — �s\ 9 a „meg i :I C s - -t‘Q.\,\:‘ . `u�a Ao r,.+ i° 0, ® a\ j . v,`-1:1 v z piW n�c� \ ..;,.. \%,,,ekk* . .„4*,,, ,...„ \ - s,,,, Q,,, ,\k\,,,, ,a ,,V;140.51,, 77`"' ,¢ tt c f € c.4 4 :d\`+,. '1,11; \x '' \Q 3 \ \ e ' 3 lli, 11 E II t 11 -,,-,S,,_ v -.-_,:ir ,, 1 C...s—s , , .,. _ , ;A / .1 il 1 21 Y4 r 1 : z 33 tit Itt 3 ` a E 3 E ;.ii is a0 / / •i\ \\' \\ a < ! I ag ' is li 1 s .'E a"w,1e min 27 min ` 1 .. 7.,.. ,. „.., ..--, ,. . , ,, . ! - -''' ' '''''' ---- - -----W. ..,._,., ayzata _:,. ..:2,... ., .... ,,,. .. :...„„ , ,, . „ , , , , leritage ., _; ,. , .. .. .,. , , _ ,,: ., .. .. . . ... , . . ... ....... ._ „, Ln 0 ,..,,..,....:..„....:..._..„ '._. ;; ,,,_,, .... , i,... ),. z, ,,,,: i .:, .,.-, , : Minnetonka° ... s,:, ,__,,,.. ?,,10.:, ,.„... ,:,, ,,.„,„ ,,.,., .„.., ,,. . ,,,,_.. . .,,:::.:. T :. ..,.._..„, , , phaven° HopkinS0 .., ..: , , , ..: ...,„,:: horewood ,,., ,,, ., ,.r. . ,. _... XMINNESOTA ', 62 a Eraer Golf Co assen0 ... ,,,, 0 . Eden Prai aska •) '4i _Shakopee Orames Fox St Ta . 25mmn � lake i40 Heritage Ln _ . es Smith Bay Nano 0% RUN DATE:07/24/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 10-117-23 11 0002 38 10-117-23 13 0009 38 10-117-23 14 0022 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH ELLEN M FRITZ TRUSTEE I L JACOBS/A JACOBS REV TRST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1035 HERITAGE LA 1700 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY ELLEN M FRITZ IRWIN L JACOBS REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 1035 HERITAGE LA ALEXANDRA JACOBS 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 1700 SHORELINE DR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 11 0003 38 10-117-23 13 0010 38 10-117-23 14 0024 I L JACOBS/A JACOBS REV TRST ELAINE D SNYDER TRUST C NELSON&R W NELSON 975 HERITAGE LA 1085 HERITAGE LA 1780 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 IRWIN L JACOBS ELAINE D SNYDER ROBERT&CAROLYN NELSON ALEXANDRA JACOBS 1085 HERITAGE LA 1780 SHORELINE DR 1700 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 11 0004 38 10-117-23 13 0016 GERARD&TIFFANE FERRER FOXHILL ASSN 980 HERITAGE LA 1105 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 GERARD&TIFFANE FERRER FOXHILL ASSN 980 HERITAGE LA NANCY BJERKE WAYZATA MN 55391 1035 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 12 0004 38 10-117-23 13 0021 J A FOSTER&L T FOSTER LOCKIE B MARKUSEN 940 BROWN RD S 1135 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JEFFREY A&LUCY T FOSTER LOCKIE B MARKUSEN 940 BROWN RD S 1135 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 12 0005 38 10-117-23 13 0023 KELLY B KROMER WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1005 HERITAGE LA 1800 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KELLY B KROMER WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1005 HERITAGE LA 600 HIGHWAY 169 S#701 • WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 38 10-117-23 13 0001 38 10-117-23 13 0024 PATRICIA A ABBOTT ET AL WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1000 BROWN RD S 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 PATRICIA A ABBOTT WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 5855 CHESHIRE PKWY N #3322 600 HIGHWAY 169 S#1660 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 38 10-117-23 13 0004 38 10-117-23 13 0025 ANTHONY A NICKLOW SCOTT W&MORGAN A KIRCHNER 1150 HERITAGE LA 1090 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ANTHONY A NICKLOW SCOTT W&MORGAN A KIRCHNER 1150 HERITAGE LA 18879 62ND PL N WAYZATA MN 55391 MAPLE GROVE MN 55311 38 10-117-23 13 0005 38 10-117-23 14 0005 A SUZANNE RETZLER TRST ET AL DENNIS L LIBBY 1 100 HERITAGE LA 1000 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KURT E RETZLER DENNIS L LIBBY 1100 HERITAGE LA 1000 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0007 38 10-117-23 14 0017 WEST BAY HOMES INC M D KUHLMANN TRUST ET AL 1080 HERITAGE LA 1760 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WEST BAY HOMES INC MEREDITH M KUHLMANN 10425 BLUFF RD MICHAEL D KUHLMANN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 1760 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0008 38 10-117-23 14 0021 S L BYRNES JR&P S BYRNES I L JACOBS/A JACOBS REV TRST 1025 HERITAGE LA 990 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAMELA&STEPHEN L BYRNES JR IRWIN L JACOBS 1025 HERITAGE LA ALEXANDRA JACOBS WAYZATA MN 55391 1700 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 7/24/2019 17 nl 940 pt *975 480 rat 4011000000100/111111P 4tdell 1000 oit •- k. 1025 990 1't 1000 1035 • est 1080 to 10 85 1090( Nat 410 17 e) 1780 1760 • 1100 • 1800 t • 1135 al) 1150 {241 i�f 1155 C gt 1160 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I ( ( ( I I I I I 1080 Heritage Lane 9 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with nowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/g i s.i nfo@hennepin us To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator y� G l4kESHO From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: August 19, 2019 Subject: #LA19-000053, City of Orono Text Amendment: Average Lake Setback Application Summary: Proposed amendment to the regulations establishing Average Lakeshore Setback provisions. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends supports of Option 1. Background The Average Lake Shore setback is established in 1992 (Ordinance 101 2nd Series)to protect the views of lake shore property owners from encroachment due to expansion and placement of structures on neighboring lots. In most cases,the average lake shore setback is established by the location of the principal structures on the neighboring lake shore lots,though there are some exceptions for lots adjacent to right of way or vacant lots. In the 18 months since January 2018,the city has processed 48 variance applications; of these variance applications, 8 included a variance from the average lake shore setback in some form. The regulation may be found in Section 78-1279: (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. The City Council recently observed a situation where the average lake shore setback didn't realistically protect a lakeview, as the setback line prescribed by ordinance bisected neighboring principal structures (Exhibit C). That, coupled with the variance frequency suggests a review of the regulation is appropriate. Average Lake Shore setback was last amended in 2015,to accommodate lots adjacent to right of way. Analysis The City Council reviewed the issue in workshop on August 12th. They identified the need to adjust FILE#LA19-000053 August 19,2019 Page 2 of 3 the average lakeshore setback lines that run through an adjacent building. However drafting regulations that does so, while meeting the goals of clarity has proven problematic. If an ordinance isn't clear,communicating the requirements is challenging,and the regulations is prone to misOinterpretation. Staff has developed three options to address the stated goals: Option 1 (Sight Line) 78-1279 (6) Average lakeshore setback. Average lakeshore setback shall be a line drawn connecting the most adjacent lake side corners of the principal structures on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. No principal or acccscory building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. b. For lots with lakeshore on two opposing sides, the average lakeshore shall only apply to the side opposite the street. Option 2 (True average) Section 78-1279 (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the Average Lake Shore Setback, a setback distance established by the average of the distance between the most lakeward protrusion of the principal structures and the OHWL on the two immediately adjacent improved residential lakeshore lots. This averaged distance shall be measured from the lakeshore. average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. b. For lots with lakeshore on two opposing sides, the average lakeshore shall only apply to the side opposite the street. Option 3 (Exception with a second line) (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore FILE#LA19-000053 August 19,2019 Page 3 of 3 setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. b. For lots with lakeshore on two opposing sides, the average lakeshore shall only apply to the side opposite the street. c. Exception. In situations where any part of the principal structure on the adjacent lots is lakeward of the ALS as described above, a second line shall be drawn connecting the most adjacent lake side corners of the principal structures on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. All three options include language related to lots with two opposing lakeshores, defining the 'protected'shore. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission feel the proposed agree with the goals? Planning Staff Recommendation The options represent differing direction. Option 2 is a true averaged setback,and is easy to define for end users,though it may not protect views to the level expected. Option 3 is our current process, with the added exception, which adds the corner to corner line described in Option 1. Staff does not support this option because it adds confusion, and is likely to be misinterpreted(as the current rule was mis-interpreted by a surveyor that has done lakeside projects in Orono for decades. Planning Staff recommends Option 1. Option 1 is a corner to corner line, eliminating the possibility of the line bisecting adjacent properties, is easy to understand and communicate while protecting views. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Pence Lane example Exhibit B. Lot samples /, /, w% /I I _. / / / 1 a 2710 Pence Black areas represent portions of -_-_Oe 1.eAV KlatITS,�'" ... / ; 1 / NW CORNER OF neighboring houses that"block" i �.318 views ------------_—9.a _ __' _ _ - I ' ---i - -----_+�--------- t arra --__.__ / DOC.wa,saue li, N.,.........i..."------- \ T.:01LD •.--..... F 1--- \ yp1^5 ,o t \ j /LOT 2 Z AVERAGE /� o Ill EXISTING HO \ .. • / ��°-----_---- _ 1�� #2715 _ / _ _ � I 11 \\ \` ` /Pr/ e N 88154'17"W 146.30 \\\\\ 1 11 \ 1 1� :9 / 8 C,41 Ab 1 11 ` 1 \1 1 ,'t.... \ p rA - 3 1/�� I II 1I '\\ '\\ ,' ' PROPOSEDSW „.„7„,,, h e N 1 I ' . 4•. &OC Q I \ • 31 set ua ul , y / 1 �' I t te) . /y 1 �\ \\\ (E) y ©' 7 ��C i!1 ' \ anaaa `' V '7 s r ••, ./ y`-�°4t.' EXISTING HOUSE . r , rK I I..',/,. i ''''• 02715 i ...';;;". !" Atifl 11',1 /0 '1\ f`\;m ‘..\ ,,\ \\ e l c\�\\\4 k i \"e1 9F '-, \\ Y '411: NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP"Ir I le ,,.4..�\\ \ \\ uKe re \\� II i co et , ,---->-, ---.. Z'Iv/ --.... ---_. .....-- SHORELINE OF .. `��\ LAKE MINNETONKA LAKE MINNETONKA LEGAL DESCRION: 0 30 60 20 Lot 2,Block 1,PENCE UWRI NE AON 000....11 1 I 0 Denotes found iron• :Denotes set Iron marker marker mf.1000.• wwiliml - Deootas adstln0 COMoUr ® Denotes proposed ebvatlon SCALE IN FEET Ti.wavey Intends to show the boundaries of the above described propery,a proposed house,a proposed and existing drive,and a pod.It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. REVISIONS 'DESIGNEE' I hereby certify that this plass mesaSutlm,or report 10.1618 .a . eabrmeaMna.rmyek.asupervision GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. Ives taw DATE BY REMARKS and Out I am a duly Lianas!Land Surveyor ander 4�ta s e Sava of the State of hennas:Su 1 3p t CML ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS CHECKER 7 1/ ITS - 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 `— 'eco PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:952-473 Dm�.7,tter wet lamas MlMaalt7rr .cA Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/11/2019 40" T } r / • '1/4 - _,,...-- 40 .44,,,,,, .. :.:.,,,.. . V b_ �... /'�,,' z lk, - 1 . ,N Itir A \ „0„)‘:\, 4 t * 4: )41, r � � i ,J�rya � �. 1 inch = 100 -et No results Comments: Casco Avenue Black line 75 lake yard Red line ALS for red starred lot Blue line is AVS for blue starred lot This data(i)Is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or suryeying purposes. Hen nepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/11/2019 01 "e r,V!t_. w L.1)''77 ,- „, , i� '}.a '�• .,'og to' yt. ,{ a� 7• /f t i..:*!.• ' '+',W*, ,0 „Ai c i .'• 4 s i ,: <,, I • ^ate , , ,, '... rr -, , --.;, ,A.0,. . :--, ,4,f.:,1 r 4pPit ''''' ' ,' '*ic .A 11.4:-.','''''' - ' t ,` . ' ' Y ' — 'ced r ''''''',.:',1,:::;•.' , j a 1 4,:ri,e,��+r,S. t ''' 7#' Art / 4 40, r t 1 inch =200 feet No results 75 Comments: i Farview Lane Black line 75 lake yard setback Note 450 foot setback This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(Iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map R 't �i{> Date: 7/11/2019 t i { �} y.. I 1 'I t.1-... ,:.,,,,,,.., , ir-• ,A,.,•.• , 3 {{ I . ��. I Y � o-" IN lifiltillt Sr v 10 w /44404iiiht. iiiiik �,. Is ._.'.q 'y � ,fin .. .-i .. ' g 1 inch =200 feet No results Comments: Forest Arms Lane Black line 75 lake yard Red line ALS for red starred lot Note orientation of houses This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or suryeying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data- COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/11/2019 V:74 is _ t . . - --NTir ....?-T,,„_—..,1,:—:-. '. 7 wow k k .... , Q i � , i t il. .1) ,kk•-,., .. t# \ . _- Ir l'S :- ' 1 1. ;\.., •,,,...,. . __ . 4,,e,\ ..1.`,,,,..., \::::,\.i, : ,,:'.,,,,,r;,'4.1%*1.,,,,...;,,,.,,,,,-,, - . ,,,s,,i,......,1, , \ .. Al ii‘ta i, .... 5w`ii.,,: , ,_.. -. ,. , ... 1 inch = 100 feet ',.:,., . '., 1 1 '\'''. Alit It No results Ks Comments: Shadywood Road Black line 75'lake setback Red Line ALS for red starred lot Blue line ALS for blue starred lot This data(i)Is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no • warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable f or any damage,Injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019