HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-permit 2015-00579/spt ctW
O
ui
0
a s.�� • a as • w �..� .r.i w �. a • i� �...a a • .�� �� �� a • v s a • �� �� : a: a • v w v �
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 www.advsur.com
SURVEY FOR: 1�ARI NE WELL
SURVEYED: February 27, 2015 DRAFTED: March 1, 2015
REVISED: March 3, 2015, to show more topography and proposed sport court.
REVISED: May 12, 2015, to show approximate septic sites per provided sketch.
REVISED: May 26, 2015, to show new sport court location and proposed grading.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 2, Block 3, Old Crystal Bay Road 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The
scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter.
Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel,
if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that
you wish shown on the survey, have been shown.
2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property.
4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography
of the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that
benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other
elevations for use on this site.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
" • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless
otherwise noted.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Signature: 9aAn 6, h�,+�,
ODa,
Date: May 26, 2015
Typed Name: James H. Parker
Reg. No. 9235
0
ORONO COPY
i
F S 8927000 F---,
I
10 I `--Drainage and Utility Easement I 10
I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I W I
I 1
o0
I o
I ON
I OI
I � I
I �
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
City of Orono ❑ DISAPPROVED I I 1
Planning & Zoning Plan Review BY I I
Site Plan Review Date: ' DATE
ROVED 5f�0& 1GKf
e.,�Apppp � Vic, III II1
I
WITH FEVISIGNS (see notes) I I
O DENIED I I
Staff:r I I I
' I 1
AJ77S77N9 CONTOUR ----- -----_-
.MSTING SPOT ELEV-477ON x 883.0
PROPOSID CONTOUR 883
PROPOSED LLEY_ITIO)V/,SPOT FLEY-ITION ---883
PRAbU40 ' "ROK — FLOIY
SILT PENCffXSTRAF LOGS SF
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
( IN FEET )
982.9
S 892700" E 101
--198.01--,v5�
983.7
a6� "
_Found 518' - Cy
Drainage and Utili#y' Easement �-
10' Tree ro � '
Of A91
/; ,I' N 8
PROPOSED SPORt' COURTS
i ------ ---- --� ��'%// /
/ X10' Tree ��EV. 986.0 ;�j; r 110'
10" Tree� � � I
`- _ ��'� 10' Tree 10 Tree 9B2' �`�b 999 o i
6 10' Tree g6' �gp - i ' ' 6rO 5
10' Tree '� ,8g° 996.6
8' TTee
10' Tree , - 6Ao�
- - - - I 10' Tree - _ " _-X87-,�N�`' e a a 6' Tr Z�O h�� ' ' 997.3
X88 , - - - ��.��8;, Ti
10' Tree -9gg- d d 8', Tree
I
I
I
7.30'00" E
15.00
10'? ? Tree 0
— — _-S _-
/1� - - "-- � "-- 998--- = 997.9O
--0
ei
/
��
v, _ --Z66--- 14" Tree N
kn
Q`FZ ` _ —995 _ - - - , , - 10' Tree 998.4 O
� r i
o - '' ...W? ��Q. ; . , / (9989 -99%------" - -------(266 ' '
. ... .'- c -' � � g9 r
--Benchmark:
Q I 10 Tree . . - ..' �'co Top of we// 998.7
.2
wed I
0 (0 l� oil 998.7X c� I
OI I 10' Treed �� �`' / Z2.9 •'�� 3 s9� $ ss> >
Z I _� 2� •s
' ry 15
I •� OecK •� 13 4
66.1 -------- �si 5- r a Driveway
------------- .O� rn ") et /
N � x o GO Gr
/
� eco_
I � /
0 Q
I 2�•3 �� 20.0 ji.
52.8 j
------------- o+
I�oP ,2�3 a pot'° �'•�;,
O ( 3• torte
°n pe°K- 9
Pre° e °P / / 5
I , *stone ��°°' /
I - otO s
" �
I 254•84,f W
76'00'0
I —' S
� I•
I I
I
W I
I
I I
I
I
1
a
I
1_3
;
I I
Iw
I I
I
I ly
IW
I
I I +•
I
I�
I
I to
I
IV
D
I to
1z I
WI I
I
� I I
JI
1§3 I
I I
tin
II
�
�
W
I I
I
k I
I
I
Fes_
Ll i
I
CITY OF ORONO
I I
_
SITE PLAN %4- GRADING PLAN
I I
I
EWPROVED
I I
❑ APPROVED WITH REVISIONS
I
City of Orono ❑ DISAPPROVED I I 1
Planning & Zoning Plan Review BY I I
Site Plan Review Date: ' DATE
ROVED 5f�0& 1GKf
e.,�Apppp � Vic, III II1
I
WITH FEVISIGNS (see notes) I I
O DENIED I I
Staff:r I I I
' I 1
AJ77S77N9 CONTOUR ----- -----_-
.MSTING SPOT ELEV-477ON x 883.0
PROPOSID CONTOUR 883
PROPOSED LLEY_ITIO)V/,SPOT FLEY-ITION ---883
PRAbU40 ' "ROK — FLOIY
SILT PENCffXSTRAF LOGS SF
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
( IN FEET )
982.9
S 892700" E 101
--198.01--,v5�
983.7
a6� "
_Found 518' - Cy
Drainage and Utili#y' Easement �-
10' Tree ro � '
Of A91
/; ,I' N 8
PROPOSED SPORt' COURTS
i ------ ---- --� ��'%// /
/ X10' Tree ��EV. 986.0 ;�j; r 110'
10" Tree� � � I
`- _ ��'� 10' Tree 10 Tree 9B2' �`�b 999 o i
6 10' Tree g6' �gp - i ' ' 6rO 5
10' Tree '� ,8g° 996.6
8' TTee
10' Tree , - 6Ao�
- - - - I 10' Tree - _ " _-X87-,�N�`' e a a 6' Tr Z�O h�� ' ' 997.3
X88 , - - - ��.��8;, Ti
10' Tree -9gg- d d 8', Tree
I
I
I
7.30'00" E
15.00
10'? ? Tree 0
— — _-S _-
/1� - - "-- � "-- 998--- = 997.9O
--0
ei
/
��
v, _ --Z66--- 14" Tree N
kn
Q`FZ ` _ —995 _ - - - , , - 10' Tree 998.4 O
� r i
o - '' ...W? ��Q. ; . , / (9989 -99%------" - -------(266 ' '
. ... .'- c -' � � g9 r
--Benchmark:
Q I 10 Tree . . - ..' �'co Top of we// 998.7
.2
wed I
0 (0 l� oil 998.7X c� I
OI I 10' Treed �� �`' / Z2.9 •'�� 3 s9� $ ss> >
Z I _� 2� •s
' ry 15
I •� OecK •� 13 4
66.1 -------- �si 5- r a Driveway
------------- .O� rn ") et /
N � x o GO Gr
/
� eco_
I � /
0 Q
I 2�•3 �� 20.0 ji.
52.8 j
------------- o+
I�oP ,2�3 a pot'° �'•�;,
O ( 3• torte
°n pe°K- 9
Pre° e °P / / 5
I , *stone ��°°' /
I - otO s
" �
I 254•84,f W
76'00'0
I —' S