HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info 08/06/2015 2 :44PM FAX Z0001/0004
Minnesota Pollution Compliance Inspection Form
c% Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SETS)
5t.Paul,MN 55155-4194 Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement
Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) For local tracRE480JED
requirements and attached forms—additional local requirements may also apply.
Submit completed form to Local Unit of Government(LUG)and system owner AUG 06 2015
within 15 days CITY OF; URONO
System Status
System status on date(mmiddlyyyy): 8/5/2015 _
Z Compliant— Certificate of Compliance F7 Noncompliant— Notice of Noncompliance
(Valid for 3 years from report date, unless shorter time (See Upgrade Requirements on.page 3.)
frame outlined in Local Ordinance.)
Reason(s)for noncompliance(check all applicable)
❑ Impact on Public Health(Compliance Component#1)—imminent threat to public health and safety
❑ Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component 43)—Imminent threat to public health and safety
❑Tank Integrity(Compliance Component 92)—Failing to protect groundwater
❑ Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)—Failing to protect groundwater
❑ Soil Separation(Compliance Component#4)--Failing to protect groundwater
❑Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance Component#5)—Noncompliant
Property Information Parcel ID#or Sec/Twp/Range:
Property address: 2165 Watertown Road,Orono Reason for inspection: Sale
Property owner_ Robert Kantor Owner's phone: 952-476-0875
or
Owner's representative: Representative phone:
Local regulatory authority: City Regulatory authority phone:
brief system description: 2- 1000 gallons septic tanks& 1000 gallon pump tank with a mound system
Comments or recommendations:
Certification
I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No
determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction,
possible abuse of the system,inadequate maintenance, or future water usage.
Inspector name: Josh Swedlund Certification number: C1659
Business name: Swedlund Septic Service License number: 2502
Inspector signature: Phone number: 952-873-3292
Necessary or Locally Required Attachments
®Soil boring logs ®System/As-built drawing ® Forms per local ordinance
❑Other information(list):
www.pca.state.mn.us - 651.296-6300 - 800.657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 - Available in alternative formats
wq-wwlsts4.31 - 3116112 Page I of 3
08/06/2015 2:44PM FAX fM0002/0004
Property address: 2165 Watertown Road,Orono Inspector initials/Date; JS 1 8/5/2015 _
(mmlddlyyyy)
1. Impact on Public Health-Compliance component#1 of 5
Compliance criteria: Verification method(s):
System discharges sewage to the ❑Yes ®No ®Searched for surface outlet
ground surface. ®Searched for seeping In yard/backup in home
System discharges sewage to drain ❑Yes ® No ❑ Excessive ponding in soil system/Q-boxes
file or surface waters. ❑ Homeowner testimony(Sae CommentslExplanotlon)
System causes sewage backup into ❑Yes ® No ❑"Black soil"above soil dispersal system
dwelling or establishment.
-. - ❑System requires"emergency"pumping
Any"yes"answer above lndl mtes the ❑ Performed dye test
system is an imminent threat to public ❑ Unable to verify(See commentwExplanatlon)
health and safety. ❑Other methods not listed(See CommenWExplanation)
Comments/Explanation:
2. Tank Integrity—Compliance component#2 of 5
Compliance criteria: _ Verification method(s):
System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes ® No Probed tank(s)bottom
cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit.
® Examined construction records
Seepage pits meeting 7080.2550 may be ❑ Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach)
compliant if allowed in focal ordinance.
Sewage tank(s)leak below their El Yes ®No 0 Observed liquid level below operating depth
designed operating depth. ® Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s)
If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: ❑ Probed outside tank(*)for"black soil"
Any"yes"answer above indicates the ❑ Unable to verify(See CommentsoExplanation)
system is failing to protect groundwater. ❑Other methods not listed(See Comments✓Explanetion)
Commer ts/Explanation:
pumped 2/26/2015
3. Other Compliance Conditions—Compliance component#3 of 5
a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged,sacked,unsecured,or appear to be structurally unsound. ❑Yes'` ®No ❑Unknown
b. Other issues(eWfical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety. ❑Yes* ®No ❑Unknown
*System Is an Imminent threat to public health and safety.
Explain:
c- System is non-protective of groundwater for other conditions as determined by inspector. ❑Yes* ®No
"System is failing to protect groundwater.
Explain:
www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800.657.3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemative formats
wq-wwfsts4-31 . 3116112 Page 2 of 3
08/06/2015 2:44PM FAX Z0003/0004
Property address: 2165 Watertown Road,Orono _ Inspector inhials/Date: JS 1 8/5/2015
(mm/dd/yyyy)
4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5
Date of installation: 5/1/1983 0 Unknown Verification method(s):
(mm/ddlyyyy) Soil observation does not expire.Previous soil
ShorelandNVellhead protection/Food beverage ❑Yes ®No observations by two independent parties are sufficient;
ladging7
unless site conditions have been altered or local
Compliance criteria: requirements differ.
For systems built prfor to April 1, 1996, and M Yes ❑No ®Conducted soil observations)(Attach boring logs)
not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ❑Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs)
Protection Area or not serving a food,
beverage or lodging establishment.• ❑Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no draintield)
Drainfleld has at least a two-foot vertical ❑Unable to verify(see Comments✓Explanatlon)
separation distance from periodically ❑Other(See Comments/Explanahon)
saturated soil or bedrock.
Non-performance systems built ApM 1, ❑Yes ❑No CommentslExplanation:
1996, or later or for non-performance
systems located in Shore/and or Wellhead Boring:
Protection Areas or serving a food, 1-16"10YR 212 Loam
beverage,or lodging establishment: 17-24" 10YR 4/4 Clay Loam
Drainfield has a three-foot vertical
separation distance from periodically No redox
saturated soil or bedrock."
"Experimental", "Other, or "Performance" E]Yes O No Indicate depths or elevations
systems built under pre-2008 Rules;Type IV "or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media plus 12"
2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector
License required) B. Periodically saturated soilibedrock over 24"
Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. System separation 36"plus
separation distance from periodically
saturated soil or bedrock.
D. Required compliance s9 =ration" 24"
Any"no"answer above indicates the system is 'May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local
failing to protect groundwater. ordinance.
5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*—Compliance component#5 of 5 ED Not applicable
Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes Q No If"yes",A below is required
Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes",B below,Is required
BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design
If the answer to both questions is"no'; this section does not need to be completed.
Compliance criteria _
a. Operating Permit number: ❑Yes ❑No
Have the Operating Permit requirements been met?
b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning?, ❑Yes ❑ No
Any "no"answer Indicates Noncompliance.
Upgrade Requirements(Minn. Stat§115.55)An imminent threat to public hearth and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use
discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period If required by local ordinance.If the system is failing to protect
ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.If an existing system
is not failing as defined in few,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repalred,replaced,or
its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more stnot. This provislon does not apply to systems in shoreland areas,
Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law.
www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296.6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 - Avai table in alternative formats
wq-wwi5ts4-31 . 3116112 Page 3 of 3
08/06/2015 2:45PM FAX 00004/0004
i
I
I
I
r114
CITY of ORONO
A-�, ,! Municipal Offices
G Street Address: Mailing Address:
`9I�ESHp4 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066
To: The Current Owner of Address ,�2 16 5 ( As A .+ er fow Ar
City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be
inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above
address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A
sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at
the Orono City Hall.
Imminent Public Health Threat
Yes
No
If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 952-249-4626 within 10
days of receipt of this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance
within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for
legal action.
System Identified as Non-Compliant
Yes 17
No
If yes, system must be brought into compliance by:
December 31, 2007
December 31, 2010
Other
Septic Ta Pump Pump out Needed
Yes ✓✓
No
The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and pumped
out every three years, City records indicate the tank(s) were last pumped out on
t 2-.2 1 --o i . The tank(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and
not through the inspection pipes, this allows for proper cleaning.
Comments:
r.
_'dtJv&
Inspector:' F Date of Inspection
Telephone(952) 249-4600 . Fax (9=2)249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
o
o ,
. . _ o
CITY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
�tAo P '""' • G
Street Address: Mailing Address:
'Eggp¢� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
To Current Owner: Address: C 6 S 'ifi t 0—^ "U
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
S STEM CONFORMITY 0-3 :
1 "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or
an imminent threat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISIS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-7):
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
tic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped 11-fLA-01 ).
Make sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not through white inspection pipes. This allows for the
proper cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter discharge out of septic system.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION(8-10):
80 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
CONMErrrS: DV 0 10&-s ok_ url St y` nk� 6ti1r�,g."k
00�\, ('a, v ,r%S t %,t.v.. : c 1 v d^
r,--y .r,- Iv S�r C t-,%,,-,r ``p ^c 1, Oce -
Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman- Septic system Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee
or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is rnerely an opinion ofthe adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
bdxmafion.
Tdephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)2494616
WW FALorono.mn.ns
CITY of ORONO
' r`. 4"E� '� Municipal Offices
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
' 'Egg04' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: Z w YQ ,+0 r Address: a w0kAerTowr\ Rj
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3):
0 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards ofthe current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-10): 6
Tank inspection indicates:
5Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Tank must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out every 3 years. Tank was last pumped
7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks
have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle(does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped
out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION(11-14):
11 Draintield is dry,no surfacing evident
12 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be
completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
COMMENTS: S �S�eM. o O K,S OK
Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee
or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
CITY OF ORONO O
Municipal Offices O O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT
G~
9kESHO4
Owner: ����aLT / ( 1(} ? � Address:—?—((?S k/Al AZ )I A) L_7zo
Permit 's:. 36 V -Dates: /t — V/ Contractors: C cy &2gsm (.CJ.
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This iSX an existing system [ I new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1_3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the Location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system Located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with Less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic has or [ I has not been identified at this time. If the Limiting soil
characteristic has not been identifie , this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspection indicates:
Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must bepimped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
field inspection indicates:
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope.setbacks.etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soiLs.water table,etc.): Q W
COMMENTS:
YJ
It I
Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the premises with the system Location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
CITYof ORONO
Municipal Offices
'! �G Street Address: Mailing Address:
E$II�g 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066
Owner: 1 Y4 64� Address: 2165 Watertown Rd.
Permit #'s: 3690 Dates: 5116191 Contractors: E. J. Peterson co.
(This is [✓\] an existing system [ ] new construction) .
YSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not. meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil level [�] has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the
saturated soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
K CONDITION (5-9) : 5
Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
(During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanks [ ] were or [xl were not confirmed
to be watertight by the licensed pumping contractor. If the tanks were not confirmed to be
watertight, this classification is subject to revision.)
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : it
11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils etc.) : low
COMMENTS:
Date of Inspection Seftlic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 a FAX 473-0510
CITY OF ORONO 0
Municipal Offices O O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT
EsH
Owner: P>11&A- k6T�t✓ Address:
Permit #I's:ys�9=Dates: Contractors: GiJi ✓ (.�•
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below. '
(This is Il an existing system I ) new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3
1 "CODE SYSTEM-'-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristichas or I I has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identi Aed, this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
T,anlc inspection indicates:
lY Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pined out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" die. pipe) must be installed to each
tank at next punpout. if tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
D i field inspection indicates:
Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope.setbacks.etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (der)ends on soils.water table.etc.): ltiJ
COMMENTS:
Date of Inspection S911ptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
- SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION
cm f
4.A" _&VO
O
STREET ADDRESS 2IrpS G��-rrcu-�
LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION RAZZA-W :C-Drs
MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE
ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED 3 t'�L / '��'G (ice pC''�G ' S-77S
-tic-.. '
NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT: - (Z"-�Ce
S .ZA
( }BORINGS
0 PERC TESTS
SYSTEM DESIGN
SITE PLAN —
( ) OTHER
OCOMMENTS � u r��-� ��►'—
gG�f 1 c I T' Z DGt� �i wArMP� T,a-SLE
DATE
THIS - SHEET -FILED /Jo' BY - • ^..�
SUBDIVISION - FILE. NO. _. _.::
T0: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
FROM: _ Michael -.P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 10, 1984
SUBJECT: Septic Testing Review - Jeff Stebbins ' Subdivision on
Watertown Road
I have reviewed the test information submitted for this two-lot subdivision .
Proposed Lot 1 on the eastern portion of the property contains loamy
and sandy soils located on a western sloped hill. The tested sites are
suitable for standard trench drainfield systems.
f The westerly lot (proposed Lot 2) contains loam soils with a high
seasonal water table at the tested sites. The house location preferred
by the developer is west of the existing driveway in wet soils. The
tested sites are located east of the driveway and will require a mound K
drainfield system at primary and alternate sites. Slopes are not a
critical factor here.
Both lots appear to have suitable drainfield sites. I would recommend
approval of the proposal.
- - - -
GCS[9OW19!�`
JUN 2 21984
SITE EVALUATION REPORT - t: . "
_ CITY OF ORON .
FOR JEFF_ STEGE US
ORONO, MINNESOTA
6-20-84
0n June 19-20,` 1984 two lots.:were tested .for_-Jeff. ,Stebb -
ins in!order to find suitable drainfield sites . Testing was
done in accordance with therovisions of WPC -
p I}0; Individual
Sewage Treatment Systems Standards.
The .east lot had very good sandy soils (out in the open
field)and yielded percolation rates and water table depths-
suitable
epthssuitable for standard drainfield systems for bo.th the prim-
ary and alternate drainfield sites. Future system design
information will be needed once the size and location of
the proposed house is. known. ---�
The west lot is partially in a drainageway down a hill
from existing houses to a creek and after recent rains is
very wet in places . We found very wet and unsuitable drain-
field soils west of the driveway and even east of the drive-
way. Thus, we tested more to the east on a slight ridge and
found fairly permeable soils that still had a high water L - -
table which would require mound systems for both the primary ,
and alternate sites . Additional system design information
will also be .needed on this site once the house size and
location are known.
1 Meanwhile, if any other information is( needed, please .-
contact me.
Sincerely,
PERCOR, INC.
_.. srk-S,. Gro. nber P .E.
-r i .
W o °•
Li
6=•!6F
4iJ
i c .LL »
.4! -
LL. � - � �� Vic.. v � � •'
1 M �
a OR
z
».._.
.41
4 ;
Lt
-
0
N •
41
_- Or _ -
:-
I
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SMET
_Test hole location rZr&riV.T _ LOT Role n=ber
T -Date 'test- hole was prepared /`) y ,' Depth of hole bottom, ZO inches.
Diameter of hole, 6 _ inches.
Soil data.from test bole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
Q -/L ,1wJ+1
Gd.4A4
Method of scratching sidewall 1, -,LF JY'iPATrxem
Depth of pea-sized gravel is bottom of hole, _� inches. Q
Date a-d hc--r of initial water filing ffao
Depth of initial water filling, iihthes above hole bottom. _
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours CF/I-I.IA.,
-
Percolation test readings made by ANN 62,rdwd 6RG on
starting at ;, a.m./.o .m Maximum water depth above hole botto:
(date)
Curing test, inches.
%me Percolation
Time i Internal, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
Minutes inches level, inches minutes per
_ inch,
O i41,
O i 8 . 1
;i0 ! s i I y
• ! 5 2 • g
7; �0 GI �S a I. 82
'� Q Z
g 77
_
--__,... .., ���::r:a ear inch.
s- ss
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SKEET
'Test -hole location
�TEB�'Fw1' Bole""number
Date` test hole was"prepared preparedS/`/�y ,"Depth of bole.bottom,;'2D inches. "
Diameter of hole,
6 inches. _
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture -
y-Za �� �Kow.c� cs•tri�
Method of scratching sidewall !VICE' Pre4r6lJr-l-e
Depth of ;ea-sized gravel in botto= of- hole, Z inches.
Date and hour of initial water fillingy,-M^i d! '/9??4V
Depth o: initial water filling, inches above hole bottom.-
Mcthod used to aaintain at least 12.4nches of rater depth in hole for at least
4 hours /PFF/GG/.y"0'
Percolation test readings made by C rulxt GiPiS.IJBE;iQG on
starting at ORS Maximum water- depth above hole bott.
(date)
during test, inches.
Percolation
' :ime ; y
Time inte�al, Measurement, { Drop in water rate, Remarks
! Minutas { inches level, inches minutes per
inch
S9/1f.
t.7l 3 .Z1. 2 2
.39' 146
z Z -
7.o
3 - 3/2 -
r1:39
i s-1S
- - PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
_Test hole location S' BB6'tis Hole number-
Date test hole was'prepared Depth of hole bottom. 20 inches.
Diameter of hole. .6 inches. -
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
Method of scratching sidewall
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottoz: of hole, Z inches.
Date and hcur of initial water f{ lin; p•" /oM
Depth .of initial water filling, Ac inches above hole bottom.
Mcthod used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours_ 'F/G.4*4
Percolation test readings made by _{�ti/t/ 49;ed /B� (� on
starting at s:D 6 a.m. Maxim— water depth above hole bottc
• _.
(date) .
during test, inches.
Percolation
�- .ime .
Ti=e 1 Inteztial, ! Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
! minutes i inches level, inches minutes per
! inch
;D r/ 6
•
_
'r1•�....1 �►1 r•w �.s��• _�M1M `0`+.� GJId„ �i^�«/ ear inch. -.. _-. - ---- •
s- is
F21COLATION TEST DATA SBaET
LOT
SS14
Test hole location-
Dat
ocation Bole number = _
Date test. hole vas prepared , Depth of hole, bottom,Y_ inches.
Diameter of hole, �_ inches. _
Soil data-from. test bole:
Depth, inches Soil texture _
Q -7 2 At k Ca r^
Method of scratching sidewall /ole SCl2zA.4 �r
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bott= of hole, _ .inches.
Dste a::d hcur of initial Later filling A-19-9'1IVE0 P,lI
Depth of initial water filling, inches above hole bottom.
Hcthod used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
L hours E 0: Ale-
Percolation test readings made by r,1jE iMr,&QA 9C-AC on
a.m. Maximi water depth above hole bottc
�Z� g starting at S:OS �-, • p
m -
(date)
during test, inches.
ime Percolation
Time Interval, ! Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
w.h
Y.inutes inches level, inches minutes per.
inch
r • ^.D - ._
r3S .3 0.
��,. . .. 9
— VqAl
.�
7.
• .. Wit..,.- - • _ '
rE W01 ATION TEST DATA sir
'Test hole location S'TFi9BE�t/S" L0 T Sole n=her
Date test- hole- was prepared 67 /49—?y .-' Depth. of hole bottoms. ' inch as.
?lsmeter of hole, o inches. _ - -- -
Soil data-from test bole:
Depth, inches " - Soil texture
Method of scratching sidevall ,fi�OLF fC',PA7'CNE�
Depth of pea-sized gravel in botte. of hole, inches.
Date and hour of initial water filling
Depth of initial water filling, ( inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours
Percolation. test readings made by. �tCA.IA .Rd�t/Bt;R on
^. r g y
a•m• axmum water depth above hole."botto
rJ .- C,76ZD��1{ starting at Mi
S:// �-� • p .
(date)
':,during test, inches.
T :ime Percolation
Time ' Interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
! Minutes � inches level, inches minutes per
- inch
30
3
o tY
31qo
30 - /s 12 -3 a
r, ..
V �s��^ �,.+.;.. .,►• .' Z g."Zq
r
�i�uta• 'ae
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET
• LQ T
'Test hole location TTF/�BFiyJ Hole number -46V
Date test- hole vas prepared -/9'�y . . Depth of hole bottom-,1Q _inches.
Diameter 'of hole, _ inches.
Soil data from test hole: -
Depth, inches Soil texture
Method of scratching sidewall /101-6 fCl2ATCN6A
..•DEpth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, _ inches.
Date and hc'ur of initial Later filling Oyn
-
Depth of initial water filling, inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of rater depth in hole for at least
4 hours
Percolation test readings trade byr��yrJ/y 1i on
a.m.
0��� starting at •O Maxims, p
water depth above hole bott:
- �-2 .m
(date)
during :est, inches.
�. "ime Percolation—
Time Interval, ! Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
! minutes f inches level, inches minutes per
inch
8
J,
' / -
'D14 AlAl
a.
-
---..�...,... �0 V�3�ucla mar tnc.
Logs of Soil Borings !
B 18
,Location or Project -
�:..Barings made by /WK FRG Date. 4Y
Classification System: AASHO USAA-SCS ; Unified ; other
• Flight or-.Bucket t other
Auxer used (check two): Hand Power ,
Boring number. b
Depth, Rorinp number-
in Depth,
in -
-- feat - Surface elevation "` feet Surface elevation
-
3 _ 3 GRf r �.e.�. eLA Y
4 _ 4
h
7 — 7 —
8
End of boring at, 4V feet. End of boring at feet.
Standing water Cable: -'__ _ - Standing water table:
_ -
~ 1 "Present at �. O feet of depth, = Present at 2,e feet o£_dep h, a
Z`1
: hours after boring Zy hours after borinst.
`present-in,boring hole Not present.in borin? bola - -
_ - :eL ra-::•:...-.t r c :.:mr- r-.:_a: -... .*.-__m -. -..- - _.�.r..F.{ps
Mottled scil �. -
,- _ ;. _ .:. ,.,� . : Mottled
.-.observed at feet of depth
_ (►bserved at 2.S feet of depth
?tot Present in boring hole _ .- Not present in boring hole
_ -' -
Obs�rvations and.comments .;'. _ :;: .. Observations and ,comments -`"
_t - _
gy-
Logs of Soil Borings
Location or Pro sect ST.IOM LOT
_ Date
Borings made by_. a�dJ �Pot,�9FR�
Classification System: 'AASHO USDA-SCS �_; Unified. other
Auver`used (check two) : Hand �, or Poorer Flight or -. other
Depth, AorinP number
Depth, Boring number.
in
inSurface elevation Surface elevation
,'_Peet
- feet
DLit CrN' /-0.401
1 _ 1 — -
2 _
Ok. �Rw. te�trn-
9 - 3 _«
BRA• CZAY6Y J,rNp
4- _ 4
5 - S —
h — f 6 —
7 — 7
8
8
End of boring at
feet. End of boring at feet.
e:
Standing water tablStanding water table:
St `
Present at feet of .depth, = " Present_.at feeC of depth,
..Z._Z_ _., _ _
Zy hours :after "boring• hours -after boring.
r.. _Not present in boring hale Not present in boring hole
Mottled soil• a Mottled soil: -
Observed at 2=3'feet of depth Observed at feet of depth.
?tot .rresent in baring hole _ Not present -in.boring hale
,, ._. ....:... .. _... ,..
Obs'i it ions,and`coria
�` ents ..
T
Obs .and cos�aaents