Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-19-1974 Planning Commission Meetingii -,�., ,, ,i�. ,., , .. tf .ar• +a Ir A ' F f 1. t VILLAGE OF ' ORONO . • ; > . , rl + y f is a ": r +yl• ., ' Special Meeting of the' Planning• Commission,' 7 30 Augustr,l2, _1974. The Planning Commission `met" on the 'above t date with the following 'members, present:`; ` .Chairman Guthrie Cur " Hake, tis, Elli`ott,i� 4 ' Kallestad, Pesek, and Van Nest. G'asch arrive dJ'at 8 :,15 ' P.M. Absent • } Kullberg. 1 .. S ' IF. 'P 4 ,.} + r r �t�•!fyd h. t Members were instructed to:reviewfthis COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE wPL4kN n Comprehensive Guide Plan bearing in mind' "' !h fir`;. ; it was a guide plan and `did not' have the ,. i' ,. • specifics of- a zoning ordinance. fir: The plan-was studied page by page with BICYCLE, &'PEDESTRIAN ` .minor wording changes.. In Chapter; 4, } .,. LANES':. r 1, it was felt there should be an inclusion /• ' " providing for bicycle 'and pedestrian • s J • r t r ', J ' .. lanes "on .streets that are using'-'this method of..traveling heavily. Members" concurred that an interchange INTERCHANGE # 19' &; F } should be planned for County Road #19' and new Highway #12, when, constructed. A public hearing was ordered on the matter PUBLIC-HEARING'DATE of the' plan to be held in the Orono High. 1' _ Y Erte :R6 `Y School cafeteria at 7 30 P.M August 26, M. ,'August F 1974. N Vi...,µ J ' ..• J J }y �•'rtv'V+ .. The meeting was adjourned at ll 00 P.M. r •`'•' i f1.,f }�y ...ADJOURNMENT,"' ,f, , h� t} �t .�� • rF '' sa >f, Respectfully y ubmi t_ ted, .• n , •f .. ! • >,k , err %. .: ; • , ', i'+ 1 I 1. a.a F Michael Scheller i Secretary pro tem. . ..• yLy .ypy P. .. ., i • f fit' r�fF J'. ''11 .• •. n ' %�y :' : . , rr `i tl ti � : /t X41 " rtr �• ° f ti [ r .:.Y 3 � 1 S•. . ., ,, ...., F •tr, 1, i ol 4S .K VILLAGE OF ORONO Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission, 7:30 P.M. August 19, 1974 The Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Guthrie, Curtis, Hake, Kullberg, and Van Nest. Elliott at 8:00 P.M. Pesek at 8:25 P.M. Absent: Gasch and Kallestad. Curtis moved, Kullberg seconded, that the MINUTES Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 15, July 15, 1974 1974, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Curtis moved, Kullberg seconded, that the MINUTES Minutes of the Public Hearing of July 29, July 29, 1974 1974, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Guthrie opened a public hearing on the PUBLIC HEARING vacation of Lake Street in Ottoville. STREET VACATION Since nobody wished to be heard, the hearing Lake Street was closed. Tom Betz showed the realignment proposed to STREET VACATION compensate the Village for the present 30' 3775 Bayside Road �f Lake Street by detouring it another way. Van Nest moved, Hake seconded, that the realignment as submitted be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . William Dolder represented himself in a VARIANCE petition for a variance to construct a 3505 Livingston Avenue residence on Lot 1, Block 4, Navarre Heights, 3505 Livingston Avenue. He was asking for a variance in size from one -half acre to 6,750 sq. ft., in width from 100' to 50', from one side setback of 10' to 41, to place a 26' X 50' house thereon. He showed a letter from the neighbor being encroached on stating he had no objection. The neighbor's residence was 40' ffom the line. Van Nest moved, Kullberg seconded, that since the lot size is consistent with many other lots in the area, there is a sewer and water assessment on the lot and service available to avoid any health problems, approval be recommended. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0) . �-en Roelofs represented Erling Falk in a VARIANCE petition for a variance to place a garage 1981 Fagerness Point Rd. addition on his home at 1981 Fagerness Point Road. Members agreed it was the only place a garage could be constructed due to terrain. (Continued) MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 Kullberg moved, Hake seconded, that the addition be allowed 8' from the, front.--... ?roperty line in alignment with'the present residence, conditioned on reducing any excessive hard cover on both sides of the road due to proximity to the lake. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). Members studied the preliminary plat for a simple subdivision as presented by John Burger to divide off a parcel from his 16 -acre homesite to contruct a residence for his son. Since the lot met the require- ments of the proposed zoning and showed an adequate 50' easement to the property and there was no need for future streets in the araa I Pesek moved, Curtis seconded, that.approval be recommended contingent on approved percolation tests. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0) . T110 Investment was represented by Frank Berman in a presentation of a preliminary , to divide Parcels 1185 . •1525, 4520, 4510, 3500 & 2500 in Sec. 30 & 31 into 54 lots and one outlot. The engineer's report was read recommending:- 1. All preliminary plats should be in accord with the Comprehensive Plan for the City: 2. Preliminary street showing present grade, proposed grade (every 1001) complete with per- of grade and showing satisfactory disposition of storm water. 3. Proposed building setback line on all lots. 4. Names of adjacent property owners. 5. The maximum length of a cul -de -sac has been set by the City's building Code.- Preliminary street layouts must comply with this code. A further study of the plat, and also site reviews by members showed there was much marsh area being divided. Van Nest explained the rationale behind Ordinance No. 125 and a copy was given to Mr. Berman along with a check list for requirements for a preliminary plat.. `_scussion now centered around the proposed give -acre zoning for this area versus the one - acre platti..g proposed by TMG. Van Nest (Continued) Page 2 VARIANCE 1983 Fagernes''s Point Rd. (Continued) SUBDIVISION 3700 Bayside Road SUBDIVISION TMG Investment Sixth Avenue North & #12 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 Page 3 explained that placing 54 residences in an SUBDIVISION, isolated area as this, with on -site systems TMG Investment would only pave the way fora sewer project (Continued) of astronomical costs through undeveloped propeaty. T,Ir. Berman agreed to.submit a revised plat. Kullberg moved, Curtis seconded, that the VARIANCE variance petition of David Maiser, 498 Park 498 Park Lane Lane, be deferred until he presents himself to answer questions. Aiotion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). Kullberg moved, Curtis seconded, that the variance petition of Les Raskob, 860 Dakota Avenue, be deferred until he presents himself to answer questions. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).. The chairman, noting there were many people in audience, asked if they wished to be heard on any matter. Mr. & Mrs. Frank Rheinhardt, ktrr. & Mrs. Dick Oliver and Mr. & Mrs. Howard White said they were there to protest the proposed parking lot construction on the 60' public access at Sandy Beach. Their complaint was that there was an over -usage of the site presently and this would only compound it. It was explained to them this was no function of the Planning Commission and the matter would be heard by the Park.Commission. Van Nest presented to all members policy recommendations concerning subdividing land containing privately owned common land, before referred to as "outlots ". The policy and rationale read as follows: Policy: Each lot in future subdivisions shall meet all requirements of the Zoning Code concerning, but not limited to, minimum lost size and width. Substandard lots in size and width can only be plotted for purposes of public dedication. Therefore, "outlots" shall not be permitted in any future land subdivision. T.ati =scale: 1. "outlots" are not created for single family dwellings and are not therefore, presently a permitted -or conditional use in any residential use district. At any future time, the Planning Commission .r Council may determine that "outlots" would be desirable in a particular residential "use district. At that time, "outlots" may be added as a conditional use with such restrictions and conditions as deemed proper by amending the nonir_g Code. (Continued) VARIANCE 860 Dakota Avenue i SANDY BEACH`COMPLAINT OUTLOTS w MINUTES OP A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 3. If any building lot is sold to a private corporation or association of homeowners for %ommon use, the Village would still have control over the following: a. The issuance of building permits for any use other than single family residential uses. b, The,issuance of a multiple dock license required for mooring of more than four boats on lakeshore lots. c. If the need for common ownership ceases to exist or Village policy dictates, the lot can be sold for development as a single family residential use. 4. By prohibiting the creation of lakeshore "outlots ", the Village will make no implied or express transfer of Riparian Rights to Non - Riparian owners. Curtis moved, Hake seconded, that recommendation be given to this policy. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0) . Curtis moved, Kullberg seconded, that the 'meting be adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0) . Respectfully submitted, Michael Scheller Secretary pro tem Page 4 OUTLOTS (Continued) ADJOURNMENT.