Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info CITY OF ORONO Date ADDRESS Connected to CODE SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY CARD Municipal Sewer Address 3?—D ,4PropertyI.D. 3 + WELL DATA Standard trench O I Mound ,? System type O Other Legal Description C O m Permit No. — Date ofpermit — Installer ? o No. Bedrooms Garb m Building type /PSS/�C 457 or GPD 4P-:t Laundry sh er I o D Q. SEPTIC TANKS: MaterialCapeci 1 ° Q 0 Proper outlet and inlet Baffles L epth level � O Height of tank bottom above water table 3 r + a to building / y 0 D h DRAINFIELD: Total length of lines N o 2 _3 Trench width y Y Total treatment area(sq.ft.) fight f a' d above water table 3 + Type of filter material i ty n � d E $ °� Distance from nearest bldg. Z� T' si Perc rate min/in ° Q. S a Depth of fill over dratnflaid epth of rock over tile, under tile c: E c U c d 3 LOCATION INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD SKETCH DATE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS a ILL-- l No suer-,a7B /ggoJ �� _s�►ati�l-.sv,��crha �l N-a3--`�p �13p 1'�\1�,/ ��S�y�,, . Is D Include: 1► Well location 2) Distance from house to septic tanks,dist.box, and drainfield ,Q�— CONFORMING N—SUBSTANDARD NONCONFORMING 3) North arrow and road � a s 2/25/02 Water/Wastewater-ISTS4.31 Compliance Inspection Form for Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Minnesota Pollution IMP Control Agency Completion of this form fulfills the minimal requirements of Minn. Stat.§ 115.55(2001)and Minnesota R.ch. 7080(1999).Please refer to local ordinances for other requirements or information especially for compliance requirements for bedroom additions. General: Date of Inspection: 'rr: Reason for inspection: r1 e Property Owner(s) 7;� z��i,� �" Telephone&!� 7 3�� Person requesting inspection OK l Tel phone( ) Site Address t City ti Zip Code �! Fire No./ Parcel No. County Township 2126 %�= Legal Description i�/(� 3 Jig a:!)4.1 2 n o 1'2, Local Regulatory Authority o Date system constructed J U - l C�Z— System in Shoreland Area: yet o /System in Wellhead Protection Area: yesno System serving a MDH licensed facility: yes a Local Permit# (if any) a- Systems built prior to April 1, 1996 and not located in Systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or Serving a Food, Areas or Serving a Food, Beverage or Lodging Beverage or Lodging Establishment Establishment, or systems Built after March 31 1996 Is the system an imminent threat to gpblic health or Is the s rn an imminent threat to public health safety? (a yes answer is an ITPHS system) or safety? (a yes answer is an ITPHS system) -Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YESNO -Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YES NO -Discharge of sewage to draindle or surface waters? YES -Discharge of sewage to drainble or surface waters?YES NO -Sewage backup into dwelling? YES N -Sewage backup into dwelling? YES NO -Situation with the potential to immediately and -Situation with the potential to immediately and adversely impact or threaten public health or adversely impact or threaten public health or safety? YE NO safety? YES NO Is the system failing? (a yes answer is a failing system) Is the system failing? (a yes answer is a failing system) -Less than TWO feet of vert.ica!separation between -Less than THREE feet of vertical separation between system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? YES system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? YES NO -A seepage pit, cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit? YES ) -A seepage pit,cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit? YES NO Is the system non-compliant? Is the system non-compliant? - Is the system regulated under a monitoring plan or - Is the system regulated under a monitoring plan or operating permit? (if no, go to page 2) YES VOoperating permit? (if no, go to page 2) YES NO If yes, If yes, -Has the required monitoring taken place? YES NO -Has the required monitoring taken place? YES NO (If no, the system is non-complying) (If no, the system is non-complying) - Does the monitoring indicate that the system meets - Does the monitoring indicate that the system meets performance expectations? YES NO performance expectations? YES NO (If no, the system is non-complying) (If no, the system is non-complying) Page 1 of 2 wq-wwists4.31 Property Owners) /ti�5 Fire No./ Parcel No. .................................................................................................... System Components (Please describe the syst components and attach site sketch showing system location): 0 What methods were used to make the determinations for the compliance insp , ion? (Note:No standard protocol exists The following list is not exhaustive, or in sequential order nor indicates which combinations may necessary to make a determination) Watertight tank(s) Hydraulic Functioning Vertical Separation Distance ❑ Probed tank bottom K Searched for surface outlet ,� Conducted soil borings ❑ Observed low liquid level ❑ Performed hydraulic test Depth to limiting layer 3z- V, Examined const. records 1i_ Searched for seeping in yard Depth to system bottom ❑ Examined empty(pumped)tank ❑ Checked for back-up in home Examined records ❑ Probed outside tank for"black soil" ❑ Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes ❑ LGU Limiting Layer Verification ❑ Pressure/vacuum check ❑ Homeowner testimony ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Examined for surging in tank ❑ "Black soil"above soil system ❑ Other Status of the system Based on the compliance criteria, the system status is: (check one) ❑ failing (to protect groundwater) ❑ an imminent threat to public health or safety (ITPHS), ❑ non-compliant(monitoring issue) Rrcompliant(none of the 3 previous conditions). Therefore, this document is a: P(Certificate of Compliance ❑ Notice of Noncompliance Is this system an EPA Class V Injection Well? ❑ yes ❑ no Certification I hereby certify as a state of Minnesota licensed Inspector and/or Designer I or Qualified Employee Inspector and/or Qualified Employee Designer I that I conducted an investigation that accurately determined the compliance status of this system and that my recorded observations are accurate as of this date. No determination of future hydraulic performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance,or future water usage. Inspector's name(print) . �,3► �l��,c� c Y Phone 7�° T License and/or Regi ation Number r,� Address Employed by !� ► Address ,Z - -- Signature 6 - Date Upgrade Requirements Iderlved from Minnesota statutes§115.55) An ITPHS must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system fails to provide sufficient groundwater protection, then the system must be upgraded, replaced, or:ts use discontinued within the time required by rule or the local ordinance. If an existing system/s not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired,replaced, or lts use ! discondnued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This does not apply to systems in shorela,7d areas, wellhead protection areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establlshments as defined in law. Suggested Attachments 1) Site sketch could also include: well, well setback to system, dwelling or other buildings,tank(s),reserved soil treatment area, surface water and soil boring locations. Include as-built drawing if available. 2) Soil boring logs, showing each horizon. Indicate the texture,color, redoximorphic features depth to bedrock, standing water and whether the material is fill. 3) A list of any and all requirements of the local ordinance that are different from the state requirements referred to on this form. 4) A homeowner survey of system performance, signed by the homeowner as being factual. 5) Monitoring data as appropriate. Page 2 of 2 'r A ° �am � / z n 1=7 QP a ao o� 3- S-ci9 LYL CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 kESII® Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 To: The Current Owner of Address 326 %UI-AAA" City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Hall. Imminent Public lth Threat Yes No If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 952-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action. System Identified as Non-Compliant Yes = No If yes, system must be brought into compliance by: December 31, 2007 December 31,2010 Other Septic Tank(s) Pump out Needed Yes No The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and pumped out every three years. City records indicate the tank(s) were last pumped out on (o -- 2 . The tank(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this allows for proper cleaning. Comments: Date of Inspection Inspector: 1? Telephone(9-52) 249-4600 - Lax (9*2) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.rnn.us 0 0 a CITY of ORONO '�i►� x' ,y Municipal OfFTi es 1", ,r �� ��,G Street Address: c15aL--149-46o O Mailing Address: © 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. an 56 Orono, MN 55356 C.tystal Bay, UN 55323-0066 To Current Owner: Address: City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the parent Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISIS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the parent Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not ding or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited MIS;an ISIS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISIS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-7): Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped- `5-10k-RrA ). Make sure septic-tanks are oumped-&rough manhole and not through white inspection pipes This allows for the proper cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter discharge out of septic system to prolong life of drainfield Ask pumper to test alarm float to verify alarm is still working in your boom The alarm warns owner that swtw is about to backup into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within.the last three years,they should be pumped out now. IELD CONDMON 8-10 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. Com rs: o.rw� \o okS �k P r,p ,� s 5 j �fl L - Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman- Septic SepiSystem Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the of the adequacy system under current conditions based on the available information. CITY of ORONO ' Nfunleipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: '$YjO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 95a-a4q-4600 To Current Owner: Address: 3a G 7y("n h4rr\ City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 10 "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which Is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISIS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISIS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(J-;7): 6 Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. ©Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped -l 9 - J�Ia,e sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not through white inspection pipes This allows for the proper cleaning. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. DRAWFIELDCONDITION(S-10): CS CD Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. _ 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. r 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed withiri 90 days. CON&ENTS: I"�ov�� a� Sc��' -V-^U 100�, OL �n.,N-S ON Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman- Septic System Inspector Note:in the ev:nt that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage orother transfer ofproperty.be advised that this report does not guarana= orcertify that an existing system will continue to function property,but is merely an opinion ofthe adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the availab' information. .� 0,11 ' 0 O t � CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: '9J� Hp4' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 April 28, 2000 Ronald& Jennifer Zelinsky 320 Turnham Road Maple Plain, Mn 55359 Dear Mr. &Mrs. Zelinsky: An inspection of your septic system was conducted on April 24, 2000. A summary of the inspection is below. Septic Tank Condition 1. Pumpout needed within one year(Last pumpout 4/16/97). The septic system is a compliant system, meaning it meets all current City and State Standards. Enclosed is a list of licensed contractors who work in Orono on a regular basis. This list is enclosed simply for your reference in case your septic system needs maintenance in the future. Also enclosed is a fact sheet explaining your septic system and how it functions. Finally, an as-built drawing is enclosed showing the approximate location of the septic system. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at the City Offices at 249-4600. Re ectfup1l , s Pence On-Site Systems Manager I Enclosures In the event this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does no guarantee or certify the existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records. Telephone(612)2494600 • Fax(612)2494616 0 0 r T CITYof ORONO V$+' el I l i� , LMunicipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: 9xE8II�g 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 L Owner: Id 6 Address:320 Turnham Rd. Permit #1s:4728 Dates:10/21/92 Contractors:Barfnecht Exc. (This is an existing system ( ] new construction) YSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level [ has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the saturated soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 5 5Pumpout not needed at this time 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. (During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanks [ ] were or ,( were not confirmed to be watertight by the licensed pumping contractor. If the tanks were not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.) DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE• (system acre and condition soils etc. ) : low COMMENTS: Date of Inspection Se is System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 9 FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO O Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATNENT r� ti INSPECTION REPORT ti �9kESHO�� Owner: Address: Permit #'s: Contractors: bf)Kl1ayk-,, City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is J -an existing system [ ) new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEMI'-A system which meets all the Location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM11-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system Located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The Limiting soil characteristic [ ) has orhas not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future roblems. Solids accumulation in tanks is at a criti be 2ai ed out QO 8 System is discharging to the surface. an s must be pumped out within ours to eliminate surface dischar e. Inspection risers missing-tanks could hpins cted. 1, dis ach tank at next punpout. If tanks have no en pumped out within the Last three years, they sho pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been Pimped out within the Last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Drainfield inspection indicates: 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 3 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope.setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils.water table.etc.): COMMENTS: Date of Inspection a is System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system Location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner CITY OF ORONO O Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT ti ��9k'E8HO4�G Owner: �?N j �,e_d Address: 32i T � Permit #'s: Dates: Contractors: City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is .44 an existing system I ) new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM11-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. lel "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic I I has or has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this c assification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. System is discharging to the surface. Tanks_must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge._ 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could no inspec ns c on r €�`3't a to each tank at next punpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pooped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Drainfield inspection indicates: 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not criticalyet. 1 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope.setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils.water table,etc.): CO TS: I�r, C>� Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT CITY INSPECTION REPORT OF POST OFFICE BOX 66 _ONO 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay,MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER O�nEs ADDRESS 322 "yy\ PERMIT NO.'S. bOnIP, DATES CONTRACTORS ` City Ordinance No.210 requires that each onsite sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is 5L an existing system ❑ new construction) El1 Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly;no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time,but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. �( 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location,but is failing to properly treat and 1� dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION.( [;a Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years,they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. ❑ Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. lit-System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours toeliminate surface ar . 4&Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ nspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ rainfoe�e'xttent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system condition) ❑ Adequate ❑ High water table ❑ Low iii-Fair ❑ Lot size ❑Medium ❑Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage 19-System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS: Date of Inspection ptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner O , 011 s - CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices ti •:� ,��' Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay,Minnesota 553234)066 ��kESII0 June 5, 1992 John Menge 320 Turnham Road Maple Plain, MN 55356 RE: Septic System Repairs Dear Mr. Menge: A recent inspection revealed that your septic system is failing to treat waste properly and must be repaired. On at least two separate occasions you have been sent notifications of the required septic system repair and a July 1 deadline has been established. We still have not received any indication that repairs have begun. Unless a repair permit is issued or a repair schedule approved by July 1, 1992, we will be forced to turn this matter over to the City Attorney. Please contact the City offices as soon as possible to discuss your repair options. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Stephen Weckman On-Site Systems Manager Enclosures: Septic Report List of Septic Contractors/Site Evaluators/Designers SW/lsv TELEPHONE—473-7357•FAX-473-0510 t SENDER: • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the N • Complete items 3, and 4a&b. following services Ifor an extra d y • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can V y return this card to you. fee): O > • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address N 22 does not permit. L Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2 ElRestricted Delivery i1 • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date d C delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. y 3rticle Addressed to: 4a. Article Number /� -- �f%�G�— �/ 4b. Service Type 0 � U �' ��• ❑ Registered ❑ Insureo qq11 ertified El COD Lu !F' � CAI �0 , ss3s U Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for 0 oMerchandise o 7. Date of Delivery i oZC Si (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y and fee is paid) C cc t ature (Agent) 0 O V) PS Form 3811, December 1991 r U.S.G.P.O. 1992-307-530 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P 137 892 812 Recei ` for �*T. Certified Mail — No Insurance Coverage Provided u,«TEU STATES Do not use for International Mail R W SERVICE (See Reverse) Sent to f e and No do— ,State and ZIP C e S.5 97 Post Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing p1 to Whom&Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to Whom, C Date,and Addressee's Address 7 TOTAL Po �l C kL &Fees 00 PostU VE USJ-S To: 320 Turnham Road From: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date: June 23, 1992 Subject: Repairs to the Existing Failing On-Site Septic System A July 1, 1992 deadline for the withdrawal of a septic repair permit was established after the system was noted to be failing on May 6, 1992. John Menge, the owner of this property, has asked for an extension of one month to secure additional bids for the septic repair. Soil testing and system design has been approved by the City and progress is being made towards the completion of repairs, so staff has determined that a one month extension is reasonable. The new deadline for the withdrawal of a permit for the repair of the existing septic system will be August 1, 1992. A formal complaint will be filed if a repair permit has not been issued by the August 1 deadline. lsv SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY Site Address: 320 Turnham Rd PID 31-118-23-42-0018 Owner Name: Jeff& Kelly Deters Owner Address: 320 Turnham Rd Maple Plain MN 55359- BuildingTvpe: residence Installer: Barfnecht Date of Permit: 10/21/92 Svstem Tvpe: mound BR's Designed for 4 In Musa?: No Shoreland?: SEPTIC TANKS: Material: precast concrete Capacitv: 1000,1000,1000 Tank Filter: DRAINFIELD: Treatment Area: 89*43 Soil Boring: yes DF Ht above Wt: 3 WELL DATA Setbacks-Well Tanks: 100 Well DF: Report In File: Depth: 200 INSPECTION RECORDS PUMPOUT RECORDS Date Notes Date GallonsOfLiquid 9/1/2006 Okay 9/3/2010 2700; 10/22/2004 Okay, pump tanks 6/6/2007 1000' 10/15/2002 no surfacing 6/24/2005 2000` 4/24/2000 no surfacing 7/8/2003 20001 10/7/1996 no surfacing 5/19/1999 1000 t 6/22/1994 replacement installation 4/16/1997 800 9/13/1996 2000' n , � a � LN � a o o� o , � • i ri ' � s6 SET- BACKS HOUSE System-must �e Tank ao' from property lines 2.f from v'et's } x`SU N•'('h- G`�=�"LE�'S" f..,�to`;�-��{ J t from b'dcs. p„ T eo!men•. area •from Ickes , ___ streams =, NOTE:Power supply and sr:itches must be locoed in a Treatment area , from property lines U'A*V-N�*'(_V �r W 4 aT Loo¢ • P P Y y ,o weather proof•enc osure outside the pumping chomber and manhole from we'!s '',ram bags. t t— L' from trees t—�i SOIL BORING ELEVAMONS t l r _ t Amin. TH.I _ Q .oda.s)P - _'Pj_ o TH.02 EL. To-f Tank t '.i a,-o-5 ' ar de /o TH"3 EL.- t _Drop to Tonk ( PRESSURE DISI RIBUTION MOUND SYSTEM .. , Min. l"to 8I Pumping T H"5 EL.- N,cx.l"to4' '_ k P -'VA U� � _ ELEVATION at PROPOSED PVVP:'4> G�?,L�LL_C�tom} Chomber o 7 ' F'�7. Pu m C%— 4"to 6•�dio.pipe Soti'Cl� � �ti�_(aL� - A�?i�4���T� S���m P C;AV.`�ER- cC_ w ' _ •8'�:`L t.-11 S c9,L„ 'Sfj's' F A ­� 'C N SYSTEM DESIGN -MOUND t:AC--V' -- -- — S3 PP\reJ A�.._ CS',( "t'l-1 C-- G\^;"-! '��SF's L"�L�� . `pe,,.a.c; j-�t�� O�-_ ":.._1G o,c•• TYPE-1, H BEDROOM , Average percolation rote min./inch (design.83 sq.ft treolment area per gat.of dory sewage flow) �'� °''" c `z - i c'o •ti vo gol./day x.83sq.ft/gal.�`�sq.ft.of treolment area +10% = 5y ) sq.ft. ( ' IOf1.widih=_5_!L ft.lenThi of bed area+side s!ope run oto I x_l:_�height= ` ' ft.x_``*�ft.Town•orea needed) Clean rock needed sq.ft.treatment area x depth of rock= < cu.ft=27= 2 I cu.yds.(3/4"to 2 Vf dla. ,includes 2"of rock above pipe) Clean Bond fill below rock needed a 3 S_cu.yds. approx. , sandy bock fill cu.yds.approx., topsoil 6"_'Z cu.yd. wAStK-`J ppy lo ��C7-.0;o 'O �S OE So�ti �rU� 1^c t<-� •i iaQ �t c1'�-- �7--�`i f�1�L_ . Number of tanks required Ist tank /cc got. It &2nd lank ogol.a inm ns PLS Fk- YAFt0� t. Pumping chamber capacity- 25% of daily seaoge flow of !�gol.=legal.+reserve storoge of 150-,;,-.I/BR:2-_0_a gol.+pipe bock dmdnoge— t PROPERTY OF: �"o N t•- of I -Z gal./100Iin.ft.of a "dio. supply pipe, lin.ft.needed :2 ct , 3 7 go!.4 manifold I V go'./100 lirft of?"dia.pipe,ln.ft.needed 7 ,?_gal. 7S 'D o --r-we-t ti VA A total capacity needed '):Y2 gat.(plus area for pump) u�r- r-,,�r,. /oc P_`1.� �a. � '"js W r� . N?" Y� • Go . Distribution pipe l'�"dia. Itl.�`�lin ft., dia. perforations ��opari Pump size 1 J a hp. (pumpobte capacity�gal. 4 cycles/day) u`cam '? 1 +c ��f`<=� p�sc�g -1-.C y Q Q:�1 r� S-P TEST/NG Note: When construcling bed 7 , INS area should be shaped Noie4Distonce from treatment area to neighboring volts— � Designed 9y 1���- r �:' to divert run-off from enterin treatment area. 1�� Tr`"u `� g Dote:L_/L/yL PH, 612-497-3566 �c 1L `�:.f�'17 il:�: '�'-1 '"1-i'`Y�_, �l r_ �. __t -���-�_' KG•G� ALt `{ � .,; �.r - x IAID Sr=i•>' ,_r,.,--•y_��:.��jz'��.,` __ ---� •t�yy� �K�� r -- Te is „P�j1?:`.j—�._�.,------ � i � _•3: � �Int%7, It,li,{ Nc!e: YEAS a-rllc i is la to G CiIN x 1 I� th,2 ,r f l°sv�J Pc,"u'r-n CCr,`ro; Chafjt,r 7030 & Loc ;l Ordirianc= 1 C h i c':< a 11 u r:a e::g-o u r-.(.1 UL- i i it'es `1-4� l / J'"� I LS!1: J 1/4,C . � of 5�-tF� �� � ,<�T •- � � �. �-.. !�/ -- `�C t �--.���------- .� ,c•��-� � Cope•�n/S/.tel, F;-{.6'2-43 t-3;5e�