Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-06-2014 Council Packet Special Meeting
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE � r �� � � � COUNCIL S�ec,c_� Y����-� ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) � "'' NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER � _ . _ , 1 � . ; ... .._ . � 1, ��� 1� �..�"` Q :��- � ` ���,L� ��,.� ���._ 3 �9 1� i 2. ' . .. � � � � ' ,� � � � �'��� � � - 3 . , , .,. _. . . , , ,, -% ,. �.Y , � . . . . , ..._. , , . ; ' : � �-_.1...�_ !, ��� , -�--, ``.� 4. ' �.L i J � ;;:.:::..,. , � ,�`_ %,. �,, :�- , ;.._' , , 5. ._..� � `�%i'� d .z,.,,.- J;` c' ��;, I 1 �. ���l` � � '�� 6. �1 �� .��� I H�r�:�;:L�.-� � � S f�!Lt S� �.�Lr�1S ���, l' , , l ':., � { ,� ;- , � 7. � 1 .. �` � .,�<<-� t �" � � � C,< k ✓�' �� � 5 it. • , , , , ,,. $. '� ;e �' '�-�i� t��_� _�.__�.�<;� � �,�� ��7�- LI �`f� �"L� I� 9. , . . _ � . . ,' , ' ! .a J��. � �-- / � � � .� � 10. � .�Lc� � , �.c !//� ,-.. , . . 11 �i . ., R , n. � f , , . , ; , , � r , . _ �� �,? g,�—'� . . � , .�. �. , _ , . . . �; , , . -, �,_ � , : : �.. _ ;� . � , � � , �, �.�. � . , �. � . �. , �-', � : J �..� �- - . 12. f , : : ; c'`- �_...� �„; y -� �, � — - � � � , , } �I • ���'��� ✓✓����� 'C/�� 13. ; ..�L ,� ��; �__ � , .1 ? � `��,+ /� 1�. � � ���'� l� {'���',/'������ ,r���:`�� �� �� ���R� �/� . � � 15. , � • - � . � '` `.,L��1�..—��„ti � � .. '�'�� � .,� V:\(LEGAL FORMS)1(FORMS)1PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE ;;� �/ MEETING DATE , �`— L1�COUNCIL S� C�G�� � ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER -� --� - 1. � �' ' ���" '� � `� ��.1 '��, ���' ,� ,2�� ���Z�_ � � �,, � �, . �'���"� .. i,— ,� �� c�_ , 2. r � �'e �<� �:-��/l l 4 r�/� �� , � ��z��,,���� s� , �� �. ,� ,� 3. ��Z �� �� '--.. , ,- • ' � 4. � �2� ' '� ._c! / � Z -�-�/ � � � � .---� � � 5. -�-�,,...� � 1-.�.f �:_��..-�.� � Y�� �,i ��.-r,., ��.ti r 6. �� � '��-�h��„' � � � . � , � f r/, : 7:�_._ �>��( � �� zz-dZ � � �1��`� ���. $. =�s� � G���— �. C1 �'���� C. , c �? ,� a ( � •` ! s. ��'� �' ; r'�� /,�c' / l ,� �o. 1t �/ � 11. �� �t 1 C.,���- �-�C�► � , 12. �� c✓.e l-�-J,�-r�»�_ %�� �X v � ���,r., �,� �.. 13. �'� J �L� Y�- �� �Srt� �,�' � c, 4'��-� �=z/,�.�V i�_ti'� 14. l � � C�� ��L 6� ��\ �>r�-C./�y ` _ /�� �� �i � � ��� � 15. ���� /�'�� ��l' �7�% Y � �� � �� � V:1(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS�\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE ��'lU� �� L!d" C:OUNCIL ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. �� � �-��F ���Y , �, �, n � , 2. ���' "� � L�i�� � �-- �� ,, �7 a`��1,.j._ �j� '1�,�� f 3. �� ��'�'� �"�, ��' (d � (� . �,��� '" I V , 4. /IL'(ey����� 1 �\V�'� � � �� � 1"`�^l� '�� 1L � ✓L ��,, � 5.� �} ���`-�i�>�-��Si� y�` �� � ��-� � �� . ��00�('� : __ . _ ( ( / , . s. �--�(di�'i,� � c� c> i-I <�.� �f f�.�Y��c��-� �l 7�� fU - Pi v�-f,� 1��' (��-� /l� t1 7. N�P s�=�nL� �3 G>�� I r�/t- / �� ��/�� �r�� 8. � .:���7 �C�ti'��S � '� 9. G�' �� �d h- v�. I` � 10. . ,�n �� ���( � ��o'�C� f � �..� 11. �+r' ��F � l � Lo��t� Lr N.+�� G�� ;�v� 12. , � � , � �� �� ..�- 13. ��1�/7 �N�=� lf��L'� ���U ����✓/�✓� �� � � 14. �) L� ��- 1 ' l�� ����.� ���(.' J�r :;�� �� ��"1CnL /� ' rn � (� (-� 15._ ( ' �� ��t�ti�e `1 �t�' �1 � €�;� � ��� �,► .�C t l-_� C.��f�on� V:\(LEGAL FORMS�1(FORMS�IPUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE / � (v - � � �COUNCIL ��P�GI � �� ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1 . - ' �', � F:, .: .�r�Y! . � ..1 r" ;� /�� .,�r " 2. j '<. i'�� _ � , �� �,�,'i . ,� � � . �I y � '� " �i�!'' f � y j'`* �/ � 3. �' � L� � s�? �� �� � ��f l �1 ti . � . �' _ �� 4. - - � � ,;/ � , . _. �, '`� 1,^a i � i �... �7r ` � �� , 5._� ��,�-.G�� , �� � �`C, r�•-t. ��`� % � �� , l i � � � � i� � � ` ; 6. ,�`-F'%t�/ 1 r /1,' -���1 f-r' i_ ( ' >`� % �. r �� "� �l i�-%/� , � � r � ' ' K . ; -- / . �., � . ,: ;_ 7. e `�T_='��j l i, � :,��Z,�� E � '�;,f /` L.l� !' . 8. ��'��. C v/�6�-�� �-�`,� /� ) � ����� �.,, ��<�. ; , � � 9. zn .`,�S.v t� V J � ��J L e�ti?.c � lvI G�k /�1� 10. ��� 5 �Jr�i;�vc��r�T� /��'j C ���'s�r� ��t C . - f , _ . 11. �-� � � � � � L � �_� �. �...-� � � : ��f'�w . s 1 �� ' � � �� , �2. -_ -�t�� �� � �� ;. � - , 7 �� '����2-=� �`�'� �����'�t � � �'� ��� -L�- � ��. �1 `� S��B ��f� �►�� ��S 3�1 � ., �-,, � _� , � . _ 15. --��71 ��'c�� �� � �/ � �? < <��ytl,� G1-���z, ���'..�z-P V:1(LEGAL FORMS�I�FORMS)\PUBUC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE f �� 1 T L� COUNCIL s P�G� �-� ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. I C� '� �� � +� Q''� '., 0 ,��v; l � � r V1/L i//Y . 2. �'� M,�, .� � 3. � � /� � z <<_ � �� .��z� �,,�� ��� 4. ��?�ji�I�l(r.'���'�i��F`I �� Y� {('� v� ���� 1:.�11 �� � ^ �1 �. � ti ��' �) 5. 1_��t i ����i '\,�i� �1.��t L�I ��a� 6. � ,,, u. � ,, ' :, �'' ��,, , ` , \ , 7 .. � \ . 1 � ` ;'� . i"�..; , �.,4a' � 4 .�) i ?l .\1�'D j. ., . . Y n...L�-..d,,i ..._ _ H. �� IM vV'�Yry � L�7S_ `Z?�y�./,��t �f s. ��-��� ��� �1���-� �� ���� �- , �.. ,� �• � i / � L l� / �o. J�'l� ��� �✓��� .(�('� /l .� ' J � 11. '/ ",� %� � , /� ./�l �i�'�� � r� , , 12. � , =�� ��'�;'-� �w_�,��� � _..��E . ' �' . � ^v � ,, ,t, � 13. � ����� ����1,`��`�� G� ,� a���� ��, � '��-� .,��� `,;,.,§ � ��� ,� , �— 14. _. � ���--� ��� I V�c2 � � ��wl �✓� • 15. V:\�LEGAL FORMS�\(FORMS�IPUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE � ' � � �� � COUNCIL S ��G( �� ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. ��� ; � " ' ;��� �;���, � c p� 2. �� �:, �P � 1y� /"� ' �`��� r ,_------ 3.�=v�� ` �r.��-�1Gt'��� ��`�� �--w : C''.�t-c�,,.�.J��� 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS�\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC Agenda for Special Council Meeting Set for Monday, January 6, 2014, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Call to Order Approval of Agenda Planning Department Report 1. 13-3638 & Source Land Capital, LLC (Pat Hiller) o/b/o Grant Wenkstern (Lakeview Golf), 13-3639 405 North Arm Drive - Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Sketch Plan Review a. Planning Report - Consultant Steve Grittman b. Presentation by Citizens for Lakeview Preservation c. Presentation by Source Land Capital d. Council Discussion Adjournment Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Date Application Received: 9-23-13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 9-27-13 Initial 60 -Day Review Period Expiration: 11-26-13 Review Period Extended via Notice on 11-21-13 to: 1-24-14 Department Approval: Name: Michael P, Gaffron Title: Asst. City Admin. - Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION .January 6, 2014 Special Meeting Administrator Approval: Term Strategy Date: January 2, 2014 Item No.. Agenda Section: Planning Dept, Item Description: 13-3638 & 13-3639, Source Land Capital on Behalf of Grant Wenkstern 405 North Arm Drive • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Sketch Plan Review Zoning District: RR —1B, One Family Rural Residential (2 acre/200' width) Comprehensive Plan: Existing Guiding: Park, Recreation, and Open Space Proposed Guiding: Rural Residential Existing Lot Areas: 142.8 acres + (inclusive of wetlands, etc.) Application Summary: (See Exhibit A) I Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment per vote of 6-1 on 10/21/13. Staff Recommendation: Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment (See Exhibit A) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - 12/26/13 Memo from Steve Grittman, NAC, Planning Consultant Exhibit B - Council Minutes of November 12, 2013 Exhibit C - Applicant's Recent Submittals: i. Graphics: Sheets 1 & 2: ALTA Survey Sheet 3: Wetlands -Slopes -Trees -Drainage Sheet 4: Soils -Geotechnical Sheet S: Conservation Design Preamble Sheet 6: Conservation Design Master Plan Basics Sheet 7: Conservation Design Master Plan Details Civil Sheet Cl: Proposed Water Distribution System Civil Sheet C2: Concept Stormwater Management Plan Civil Sheet C3: Concept Septic Design Civil Sheet C4: Transportation Plan ii. Hennepin County Comments 11/19/13 iii. Requests for Wetland Type & Boundary Delineation Approval 12/18/13 iv. Cover Sheet and EAW Draft Q&A Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 13-3638/13-3639 January 2, 2014 Page 2 Exhibit D - Materials Submitted by Citizens for Lakeview Preservation (Not received as of print time - to be forwarded via email) Exhibit E - Public Comments Received After 11/12/13 Council Packet Distribution Exhibit F - Notice of 60 -Day Review Period Extension Exhibit G - Development Analysis: Dickey/Coffin/Thompson Properties Note: Additional items submitted by applicant but not attached include soil boring report & logs, and wetland delineation report. The staff report on this item is attached as Exhibit A. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to direct staff to prepare a Resolution for consideration and action at the January 13 City Council meeting. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4500 Oison Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MIS 554.22 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2501 planners@naoplannIng.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor McMillan and Orono City Council FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: December 26, 2013 RE: Lakeview Golf Course — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Source Land Capital, Grant Wenkstern, et al NAC FILE: 289.06 This report supplements the previous planning reviews of the Lakeview Golf Course Comprehensive Plan Amendment, in advance of the City Council's special meeting on Monday, January 6, 2014. The purpose of that meeting will be to consider the approval or denial of the Amendment, with the expectation that the Council will direct staff to prepare a Resolution and findings of fact for the following regular meeting on January 13, 2014. This memorandum summarizes the Council options for Denial (Section A), Approval (Section B), and consideration of the Sketch Plan (Section C). As discussed below, the applicants have prepared a second alternative sketch plan for review, included with this report. In short summary, that plan is intended to be a standard 2 acre lot subdivision under the RR -1 B zoning, with a single street entrance to West Branch, private septic field area for each lot, and elimination of the previous cluster plan amenities of common open space and community building. In support of the revised sketch plan, the applicants state that they have taken a series of soil borings and percolation tests, prepared a generalized stormwater management plan, conferred with Hennepin County in relation to road design and access, conferred with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on stormwater, and addressed (at sketch level), the directives of the City's Conservation Design principles. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] The applicants put this information forward in support of their contention that the property can be reasonably developed under the City's existing ordinances, addressing such issues as lake water quality, traffic safety, and other factors. Staff has not examined these elements in detail, however, taking them at face value, they appear to support the contentions made by the developer. The City's engineer will need to review the materials in more detail (commonly occurring with Preliminary Plat submittal) to verify the proposal as submitted. Actions for City Council Consideration A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Options and Consequences of a "NO" vote. A.I. A negative vote on the Amendment to the Community Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) to Rural Residential would leave the property owner in the same situation as today. Possible Findings supporting such a motion would include following: Goals in the CMP relating to (1) encouraging existing private open space to remain; (2) addressing environmental protection objectives of the CMP; (3) avoiding traffic conflicts and patterns generated by residential development which could create impacts for intersections with County 19, particularly during winter season. Consequences of a NO vote would raise the issue of reasonable use of the property, and the limits of local land use management authority. As discussed with the Council previously, the City is at risk of a "takings" claim if the City's land use regulations overly burden a particular property by leaving a parcel with little or no reasonable beneficial use. A companion risk is Minnesota courts have found that a local government may not require one property owner to absorb an inordinate share of the cost of providing public services, in this case, public open space. Thus, by leaving a property owner with no reasonable use, and passing the burden of providing public open space onto this owner, the City runs a risk of paying compensation for a regulatory taking (sometimes also called "inverse condemnation"). A.2. A negative vote on the Amendment could be accompanied by a decision to exercise the City's power of eminent domain, purchasing the property for its fair market value, for a "public" use. Public parks and/or open space would be a legitimate public use in this scenario. 2 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Possible findings would include (1) encouraging existing private open space to remain by converting it to public ownership; (2) addressing environmental protection objectives of the CMP through public ownership and management. Consequences of a NO vote, coupled with an eminent domain action would avoid a "takings" challenge, although establishing fair market value is an uncertain route. The City would be subject to the outcome of a legal determination of value which can exceed the City's expectations, and would also likely be expensive to pursue and defend. The principal impact of this option would be budgetary. A.3. The City could attempt to negotiate with the owners to acquire the property through a negotiated purchase as a part of a NO vote on the Comp Plan Amendment. The owners or contract purchasers have stated in various forums that the property is not for sale. Consequences of this option are both budgetary and legal. The City cannot compel the owners (short of the eminent domain option is A.2. above) to negotiate a sale. Moreover, making a land use decision that differentially affects the value that the City might pay for the property can be problematic. B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Options and Consequences of a "YES" vote. B.1. - Changes the land use designation to accommodate residential development. - Approval does NOT grant property rights, since those rights are granted with Preliminary Plat approval. - Camp Plan Amendment approval retains City authority in reviewing and approving a design for the subdivision under the Preliminary Plat process, including review of engineering, zoning, environmental, open space, and traffic impacts of a proposed development. Findings could include those suggested in the original staff report, among others: a. The existing land use designation no longer provides a viable use of land for a private property owner. 3 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] b. The land use designation, in this case, unreasonably restricts the owners' use of the land in an economically viable way. c. The restriction to the current designation places an inordinate burden on the landowner to provide public open space. d. The surrounding land uses are dominated by rural density residential uses, along with some urban residential uses. e. The area is not within the MUSA, in which public sanitary sewer would be available for urban densities. f. The area is not within the northwest portion of the city, in which rural uses and densities are designated. g. The most appropriate use for the subject project is Rural Residential, reflecting the policies of the Community Management Plan and the existing zoning of the property. Consequences of an approval first would result in submission of the Comp Plan Amendment to surrounding communities for review and comment, and then to the Metropolitan Council. Met Council's obligation is to making a determination as to whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the regional planning documents within its areas of jurisdiction — primarily Housing, Parks, Transportation, Sewers and Surface Water Management. Following Met Council review, the City Council would formally adopt the amendment, which then would lead, presumably, to an application for a Preliminary Plat. Other zoning applications may be included as part of the subdivision application. To submit a Preliminary Plat request, the applicant will need to prepare all of the supporting documents identified in the City's Subdivision Ordinance, including engineering and other plans necessary to ensure that the plans meet the City's (and other agencies') requirements. 4 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] C. Consideration of Sketch Plan review — Review and Comment C.1. The baseline plan prepared by the applicants included a standard subdivision of the property into 2 acre lots. The street plan provided for several access points onto neighboring roads, including North Arm Drive and West Branch (County Road 151). C.2. The first alternative plan, considered by the Planning Commission, utilized an R -PUD approach with provided access to a central road, from which several short spurs extended to clusters of 1 acre lots. The primary feature of that design was retention of just under half of the gross land area as common open space. While the Planning Commission gave an informal endorsement to this idea, the City Council was less favorable. C.3. The applicants have subsequently developed a second alternative which is based on further site exploration and analysis. This plan was presented to a group of neighbors at an open house on Thursday, December 19, 2013. The applicants' information identifies a series of areas that are expected to be suitable for septic system locations, then creates a subdivision of 2 acre lots that would have adequate are for primary and secondary drainfields on each of the private parcels. In this plan, a single entrance to the development is located on West Branch, creating a full intersection with Forest Arms Lane. An emergency access drive would be available to North Arm if needed. This plan shows 55 lots — staff would point out that no formal analysis of the sketch plan has been done to document the applicants' claims — that would be a function of Preliminary Plan review. As before, comment only is required for Sketch Plan review. No subdivision approval is given or implied, since the data for a subdivision only comes in fully with the Preliminary Plat application. Summary and Recommendations The formal application for the City Council's consideration is action on the Planning Commission's recommendation for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Item 1 below provides wording for the appropriate motion. While this action moves the project forward in a specific way, there are still a number of steps that would be necessary before the proposal is ready for consideration of final 5 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] development approvals. This first stage (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) has its own set of sub -steps. If the Council moves to approve the amendment, there is a staged process to follow: 1. Motion to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval for consideration at the next City Council meeting (January 13, 2014) including appropriate findings of fact; and, direct staff to distribute the Amendment to affected jurisdictions and Metropolitan Council for review and comment, as required by state statute. 2. Following the required comment period (60 days+), staff would bring a formal adoption resolution for Council consideration. After this, the property would be eligible for an application for Preliminary Plat and Zoning District amendment (as necessary). If the City Council plans to reject the proposed amendment, a similar motion directing staff to prepare such a Resolution and Findings for the January 13, 2014 meeting would be appropriate. As noted above, it will be important to consider any necessary contemporaneous actions as a part of an action to deny the amendment. With regard to the Sketch Plan, the Council should provide any additional comment related to the previous or newer concept plans. Under a standard plat arrangement, the applicant would be required to design a project that has the minimum width and lot area for each lot on public streets. . As noted, the Planning Commission provided an informal endorsement of the RPUD process, subject to the applicant's ability to demonstrate compliance will each of the various development standards in the zoning and subdivision ordinances. Apart from the use of RPUD zoning, the Commission's comments emphasized the need to demonstrate compliance with those standards, including septic system suitability, stormwater management, road access design, pedestrian access, and other applicable elements. For Council comment, it may be helpful to apply those objectives to the revised sketch plan, even though RPUD is not requested in the most recent layout. 10 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/ File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3631 OURCE, LLC (TODD HOLMERS), 3700 NORTHERNAVENUE, SUBDIVISION— PRE LI NARY PLAT —PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, Continued) Kempf stated this development w change the character of the whole neighborhood. riginally there were a bunch of cabins that have si c become year-round homes. Kempf stated th opportunity to really define the neighborhood is here, and i he houses are packed in tightly, it will de ne the no Kempf asked for clarification on the McMillan indicated the motion is to approve O 'on 1, which is the pr osal for six houses in a row on the southern part of the property with the propertXthhe McMillan stated there would be no outlot. Anderson noted there would be a conservation co an outlot. Kempf stated it is an unofficial wildlife preserveund the pond does not make much sense. Lynn Peterson, 3710 Togo Road, stated s would like to see four 1 -foot lots. Peterson stated while there are some lots in the are/tthhatare aller, the City ought to try toeserve the 100 -foot lot width and not go backwards to when thbins. Peterson indicated she wu like to see the area less densely populated. While thuld like to be able to sell more lots, e City should do the right thing and limit the density. Mayor McMillan closee public comment portion at 7:56 p.m McMillan statedxher view four lots can be built according to code and that under thatenario they would not be ing out the property, which is a win/win. McMillan indicated she canno upport Option 1. Millan stated under Option 1, there should be a maximum of five lots and prefe bly four. McMill stated she does not have a problem with the lot lines going through the conservation semen and w;& a maximum of four lots a rain garden would not be needed. UW, 8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Pat Diller, Applicant, was present. Steve Grittman stated the application before the City Council is a proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan that would re -guide the Lakeview Golf property from parks, recreational, and open space to rural residential. The applicants have also provided a sketch plan for Council's review. Both of these items were heard by the Planning Commission at their October 21 meeting. A public hearing was held at that time to consider the Comprehensive Plan amendment and to comment on the sketch plan. Page 10 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTANDSKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) Grittman noted the sketch plan is not subject to formal approval or denial but is to help illustrate the development idea proposed by the applicant. The proposal is to convert the golf course to rural residential. The property is currently zoned rural residential RR -1B, which does accommodate golf courses and reflects the historical use of the property. Eventually, if this application does proceed forward, a preliminary and final plat would be required and possibly a PRD zoning designation depending on the plat. Grittman noted there are several other agencies involved in the review of the project, such as Hennepin County as it relates to access to county roadways, review of the plat and survey; the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as it relates to stormwater management, re -vegetation and land restoration on portions of the site; and the Metropolitan Council as it relates to the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Each of those agencies would have a role in reviewing and/or approving certain parts of the plat or project. The first step of the application involves the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan review factors include compatibility of the proposed change with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; compatibility of the proposed land use with other existing and proposed land uses in the area.; the ability of the proposed land use to be served by existing public services and existing transportation facilities; and changes in conditions since the adoption of the current Community Management Plan suggesting that a change in land use policy and objectives is in the best interest of the community. The City is not precluded from considering interim changes if there is reason to do so. The Community Management Plan is the community's most basic statement of its land use policy. The City is granted broad discretion in setting land use policy and is permitted to regulate, through zoning and subdivision controls, to achieve its policy objectives. The existing Community Management Plan has a land use component. Grittman stated the dark green in the middle of the map is the golf course designated parks and recreational and open space. The light green to the south of the proposed development is rural residential, which is one unit per two acres and is the zoning the applicants are seeking. The yellow area to the cast and southeast of the golf course is the MUSA area and is subject to metro sewer. That area is guided low to medium density, which are two to three units per acre typically. In addition, the Community Management Plan has a category of rural, which is one to five acres. The Comprehensive Plan describes that area typically as the northwest area. Grittman noted rural environment is a major objective of the City's Community Management Plan. Rural residential is the predominant land use in the area. If a council is going to change the compatibility of a piece of property, the surrounding land use is one of the factors to consider. Grittman noted there are urban land uses within the MUSA that exist to the east and south. MUSA is not proposed to be extended into this development. Most of the proposed development services are proposed to be private so there should be relatively minimal impacts on general city public services as a result of the change. Page 11 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT FILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN RE VIEW, Continued) Grittman stated from a Comprehensive Plan standpoint, the surrounding land uses are predominantly rural residential. The current zoning is RR -1B, which allows rural residential development at one dwelling unit per two acres of dry land. The roadways in this area are definite issues and are factors that any developer would have to consider. Access to the neighboring roads and North Arm Drive, which currently serves the golf course, will need to be addressed. Improvements to the roadways, if deemed necessary, would be studied as part of the preliminary plat submission. Grittman noted retaining the current open space designation is not economically viable for the private land owner. Grittman stated the City cannot compel a single property owner to provide public space out of the scope that other individual property owners contribute to that cause. Grittman stated the sketch plan review from the City's perspective is to identify issues or objectives and is not an approval or denial. A sketch plan review is the City's opportunity to explain to the developers what the City would like to see happen with the property. Since the information is still preliminary at this point, the comments are intended to help all parties understand the requirements for a full plat design and give everyone an understanding of what the base line rules are going to be. As it relates to the overall view of the sketch plan, the proposal is based on 118 acres of dry buildable land. The proposal consists of two possible alternative layouts, with one of those offered as the preferred alternative for the property. The second option is a layout that is based on the allowable density under the proposed amendment and follows the current zoning. The second option is based on preliminary site data and the lot count would need to be verified. Grittman indicated the first plan illustrates an alternative that would utilize the threshold unit count under the zoning and land use plan and then cluster those lots to the higher portions of the site. By reducing the lot sizes and clustering the as shown in the plan, the applicants would propose to retain a significant portion of the site for open space. Much of this preservation area is shown around the perimeter of the site. The layout proposed in Option 1 is a traditional layout with full development of the property except for the wetlands. There would be approximately 6,500 lineal feet of roadway. There are four road connections to existing roadways in the sketch which include two roadways to North Arm Drive and two road connections to West Branch that are shown to provide access to the lots within the project. There are four lots with direct access to the existing street, with the remaining lots having access to the new street within the development. There are no other significant amenities as part of the development that are outlined in the sketch plan. Subject to all the data that would need to be provided as part of a plat application, the question is whether the City is more inclined to a PRD or the traditional two acre zoning. The Planning Commission's recommendations were to follow the PRD approach and retain the common open space. The Planning Commission also commented on how to address traffic, pedestrian issues, stormwater management issues, and septic suitability on the smaller lots. Page 12 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 133639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARMDRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Staff is recommending approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and finds the following: The existing land use designation no longer provides a viable use of land for a private property owner. 2 The land use designation, in this case, unreasonably restricts the owner's use of the land in an economically viable way. The restriction to the current designation places an inordinate burden on the landowner to provide public open space. 4. The surrounding land uses are dominated by rural density residential uses, along with some urban residential uses. 5. The area is not within the MUSA, in which public sanitary sewer would be available for urban densities. 6. The area is within the northwest portion of the City, in which road uses and densities are designated. The most appropriate use for the subject project is Rural Residential, reflecting the policies of the Community Management Plan and the existing zoning of the property. McMillan asked if the applicant can begin any work on the preliminary plat during this comment period for the Comprehensive Pian amendment. Grittman stated the applicant can proceed with work on the site but that they do so at their own risk. McMillan asked if there would be an opportunity to look at the preliminary plat at the same time as adoption of the amendment. Grittman indicated that is probably more local practice and that he would defer to Staff on that. Grittman noted the Council would not be able to take action on the plat until the Comprehensive Plan amendment is adopted. City Attorney Poehler indicated the Council could do it concurrently if they chose. Printup asked why this area was originally guided recreational and open space in the Comprehensive Plan. Page 13 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OR THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 20.3 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN(LAKEVIEWGOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) Gaffron stated the map that showed existing land use was showing what was existing in the 1980s. In the 1990s, Metropolitan Council's requirements for local comprehensive planning included a requirement that the City not only show the existing plan but a proposed plan. The 2000 Comprehensive Plan did not change much in the way of open space and this property, in the last two comprehensive plans, is shown as existing open space and proposed open space, which did not change between 1980 and 2000. Gaffron stated the impact of what is in the plan changed as a result of state statute requirements. Printup asked if there are any other areas in the City that might prove as difficult as this situation. Gaffron stated if any of the other privately owned golf courses wanted to change to residential use, the same process would be required. Printup asked whether they also have this underlying zoning Gaffron stated every one of the golf courses is classified as RR -IB, two -acre single family zoning, but each of them is also designated as park land, recreation, and open space. Pat Hiller, Applicant, stated when they initially took a look at the project, the objectives were to work with the existing topography of the site, minimize the grading, work with the natural beauty of the site, and maintain the open space and natural features of the site. Hiller stated they are proposing a concept of clustering the lots to help maintain more open space, which, in their view, is more attractive. One of the goals of the development is to create a legacy for the City and the Wenksterns that people will be proud of. Mike Gehr, Designer, stated he is currently under contract with five golf courses, including this one, to redevelop the land. The parcel consists of approximately 130 acres of land and is bounded by North Arm on the northeast, North Shore on the west, and West Branch on the south. Gehr displayed a map of the property and noted the lightest colors on the site map are plateaus or platforms situated throughout the 130 acres. The orange areas on the maps depict slopes and the blue areas are the drainage patterns throughout the site. There are also two wetlands on the site consisting of approximately nine acres. The lake on the property is at about a 920' or 930' elevation. As you go down to the next plateau, there is a 50 -foot elevation change. Gehr commented the site is very dynamic with a number of different natural features that they will attempt to preserve as part of this project. The other natural features on the site include savannahs and trees. Gehr stated in their view the better use of the property is to cluster the development and protect or set aside approximately 62 acres of the site into open space. At the present time 59 units on approximately one acre lots are displayed on the map along with the road layout. In addition to clustering the development, also being proposed is the use of cul-de-sacs to further micro -cluster units around the cul- de-sacs. Every residential home site on the plan has direct rear yard or side yard access to the open space system. There will be approximately 1.5 miles of trail that will connect the residential home sites throughout the entire area. The majority of the existing woodland is intended to be left untouched and is included within the green open space. Page 14 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 20.13 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/R/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHAR41 DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) The open areas will be encumbered by an easement and protected in their natural state. Gehr stated the cluster plan provides open space and an opportunity to enhance the natural environment, would have a low impact use on the property, and provides valuable open space along with the walking trail. Gehr stated in their view the cluster plan will help preserve the natural features of the site and provide a significant amount of green space. The open space provides open separation and perceived separation from outside the development and helps create a beautiful residential neighborhood. Gehr stated in his view the cluster plan could serve as a model plan for other cluster developments in the community. McMillan asked whether he has experience with clustering septic systems on one -acre lots before. Gehr indicated he does on a project in Eagan that consisted of one acre lots, with primary and secondary septic sites on the one -acre lots along with building pads. McMillan asked whether he had any limits on footprint on the project in Eagan. Gehr indicated he does not recall. Anderson asked how they intend to protect the wooded savannah areas if each lot is being sold off to a different contractor. Gehr indicated that can be accomplished through the purchase agreement and that they would have to define the limits of the septic area and other areas of preservation. Anderson asked what would happen with the proposal if the cluster plan does not accommodate the 59 lots they are anticipating. Hiller stated on October 15 they held an informal neighborhood meeting and several concerns were raised at that time. The access to North Arm Drive was not well received by the neighbors due to the lack of shoulders and the amount of traffic on the road. Hiller stated they are in agreement that that access would not be the best and that they are now proposing a single entrance to the south to get the traffic off of North Arm Drive. Hiller stated that location works better for the residents of North Arm Drive but the neighbors on either side of the road were not thrilled with the proposal. Hiller stated as a result of those concerns, they are proposing to relocate the road over to Forest Arm in the hope that that would be the least offensive location. There will be two dedicated lanes in and out. The idea would be to go with a single entrance and possibly an emergency breakaway area near a cul-de- sac. Hiller indicated they met with representatives of Hennepin County today and generally they are in line with the proposal. Page 15 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8 #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANRE VIEW, Continued) Onsite preliminary septic testing is being conducted at the present time and the vendor is going through the results and identifying areas throughout the site that will work for septic. Hiller stated in addition they are also working on a subsequent design that will look a little different than what is before the Council tonight based on the septic sites. Hiller stated in his view the open space and septic sites will be approximately the same but will be in a slightly different layout. Hiller stated once all of that is completed, they will be able to determine the exact number of lots. Hiller stated they have also met with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and they have indicated they would like to be an active partner in the development of the property. The Watershed District has done projects like this in the past and they have experts on the types of vegetation that would work in this climate. The idea is to restore the areas with native grasses that will not be developed. In the end the hope is to make it a more beautiful site than what exists right now. Hiller stated they are also looking at filter ponds to improve the water quality of the runoff going into the bay. Another option is to bring water in from the City of Minnetrista to avoid the need to dig 59 wells. Hiller indicated they will continue with septic testing and survey work. Printup asked if the 59 homes is the best case scenario. Hiller stated that would be the maximum number and the actual number will be based on the septic site testing. Mayor McMillan opened the meeting up for public comment at 8:45 p.m. Paula Johnson, 580 North Arm Drive, stated as it relates to the re -guidance of Lakeview, it should be pointed out that this is not a five or ten acre parcel but 130 acres and that it is the last big piece of land in Orono that is not developed. The requested guidance would significantly impact the residents and would undermine the intent of the Community Management Plan. Johnson indicated she has read the City's Community Management Plan and the consultant's recommendations. Johnson stated she respectfully disagrees with the consultant's findings. The consultant states, in part, that the existing land use designation no longer provides a viable use of the land for the private property owner, that the owner is restricted from an economically viable use, and that this is an inherent burden. The consultant does not cite data or statistics of whether other alternatives were considered. Johnson stated her comments are confined to the Community Management Plan and the lack of attention by the consultant on the salient portions of the plan and the impact on the plan that the re -guidance would have. from the beginning pages that lay out the goals for each section, the Community Management Plan and Lakeview seem to be inexplicitly linked. Johnson stated she would like to point to the foremost guiding principle, which is that the goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, its water quality and recreational assets. Johnson commented the Lakeview property is all of those. Lakeview drains into North Arm and Forest Lake and is within the 100 -foot overlay of Lake Minnetonka on two of its three sides. Page 16 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENASTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) Johnson noted another goal of the City is to protect and preserve natural resources, including creeks, lakes, marshes, wetlands, woodlands, ground water and steep slopes. Lakeview has virtually all of these. In addition, the property embodies the dark skies and provides to at least those residents in the western half of Orono the dark sky concept. Johnson stated Orono's planning policies reinforce the se goals and that she would urge the City Council to look at the Community Management Plan. The plan further says that no development would be permitted that would have a detrimental effect on the lake and that historically significant buildings, places and settings will be identified and preserved. Johnson stated the environmental protection plan contained within the Community Management Plan consists of exactly the same language for dark sides and preservation of historical places. Johnson noted Lakeview has been a golf course for over 50 years. Johnson stated as it relates to the City's park and open space trail plan, which is kind of the heart of where the plan is significantly abrogated, it states that private open space and recreational facilities should be available to complement public facilities. The language goes on to say that there are several of these areas in Orono and they should be preserved. Johnson noted Lakeview is the only public course that is privately owned and that when this property is taken out of the calculation that is included in the plan, it leaves precious little land that is not designated truly private and barred from public use. Johnson stated in her view the planners recognized this when they added to their plan the following promise: The City will encourage the preservation of private open space and will identify and acquire additional open space public parcels as the opportunity arises. Johnson commented what is really telling is the middle of that, which says, however, once land is developed, the opportunity for preservation of open space is lost. As it relates to Lakeview, it reads: The City will encourage retention and continued operation of the private golf courses. These private facilities provide major active recreation in the City and in addition provide aesthetic open space and open vistas to the benefit of all adjacent property owners and the public alike. The City will discourage conversion of these facilities into non -recreational land use because of the benefit of this recreational opportunity. It also states the City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding and will continue to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintain the level of active and passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. Johnson stated for those reasons she believes that the re -guidance of the Lakeview Golf Course as it is currently proposed abrogates the plan and its goals. Johnson stated she would urge the Council to uphold the current guidance while the City seeks with the residents other viable options for this property and that one proposed deal should not be allowed to destroy the City's whole community management plan. Bryce Johnson, 580 North Arm Drive, stated he bas been asked to present a proposal to the City Council from a large group of fellow citizens who desire to be heard on this matter. This group has coalesced around the name of Citizens for Lakeview Preservation. The group began when 54 residents met at the Lafayette Club. In one week the number of people who have identified with this effort and provided their signatures has reached almost 500. Most of the signers have expressed significant concerns and others have merely signed the petition. Page 17 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCHPL,4NREVIEW, Continued) Citizens for Lakeview Preservation include residents from all walks of life, all of whom have chosen to invest in Orono. They have a vast magnitude of skill sets that are committed to the spirit, intent, and defense of the Community Management Plan. The group respects the fact that the owner of Lakeview has the right to sell his property, they admire what he has done with the property over the years, and they recognize there is a purchaser who has presented sketches and is requesting an amendment to change the guidance. The group intends to provide fact -based timely input to the Council, seeks to protect the unique and fragile environment of Lakeview, and it is driven by an intense desire shared by virtually everyone in Orono and surrounding communities to retain this iconic and historic property as green; as possible and accessible as possible to the public. Johnson commented Lakeview is just not another golf course. Johnson stated their proposal can be summarized in one slide: A request that the Council uphold the Community Management Plan guidance, that it do this for at least 60 days following the expiration of the initial 60 -day period on November 25, and that it do this so that efforts can go forward to define one or more clear-cut, economically viable alternatives that would allow the owner to sell his property without the need to re -guide the site. Johnson indicated there has already been considerable thought and input into this concept but more needs to be done. Johnson stated there are a number of state or governmental entities that can be approached to help. Johnson stated aspects of their proposal have already begun and that they have received early indications of financial support. In paraIIel fashion, the group believes that the environmental and related analysis and the decision to re -guide must be fully defined. The group believes this is essential before a credible site plan or plat map can be proposed. The environmental values evident in the Orono Community Management Plan are well defined and extensive. Johnson noted over 400 citizens have expressed their concern for these issues through a petition. Johnson stated other analyses and inputs are also Iikely in defining buildability and that those should be important to any developer before asking for a guidance change. The citizens of Orono are confident that the City will address the environmental and buildability concerns, which is why many of the residents moved to this area. The citizens also recognize that this will take time to do and that a 60 -day delay will be needed. Similarly, the group is optimistic that realistic, economically viable alternatives can be defined. The group also understands that much of this initiative must come from the citizens and that the residents need time prior to the zoning being changed to look at other options. (Recess taken from 8:57 p.m. to 9:08 p.m.) (Cynthia Bremer and Jessica Loftus leave the meeting at 9:08 p.m.) Tom Mazer, 560 North Arm Drive, stated he has lived in this area for approximately 40 years and that he appreciates the opportunity to address an issue that is of grave concern to many citizens in Orono. Mazer stated this proposal has the potential for a failed development and that it is something that should be considered when talking about developments like this. Page 18 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKE VIE W GOLF), 405 NOR THARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Mazer stated he would like to summarize one point from an article that was in the Star Tribune in April of 2010 entitled Gateway to Disaster. Ted Waite, founder of Gateway Computers, is part of Lakeland Construction Finance, who is responsible for more than 20 residential developments on the outskirts of the Twin Cities and St. Cloud that have gone into bankruptcy. The homes now stand unfinished and abandoned, Families that built in places like Summit Hills, Dassell, and other areas now live in suburban ghost towns surrounded by overgrown weeds and partially paved streets. The cities and the residents where these and other failed developments exist are left with unsightly scars on the land and millions of dollars in expenses to finish roads and utilities. Mazer stated the reason he wanted to point out was not to question the abilities of this developer but to note that even under the best of circumstances, projects like the ones that have been discussed may fail. There are economic factors the developer has no control over and these factors can adversely affect the success of any development. Mazer stated these same economic forces have made it difficult to operate golf courses in the last five years. Mazer stated if people look to the past, they will a situation where many developers had big visions of planned communities that have failed. As people look into the future, Mazer questioned what reassurances the residents have that this development will not also fail. Mazer stated the economy is being supported by quantitative easing, and when the Federal Government decides to taper, mortgage rates will rise and residential developments will fail again. Mazer stated when he and other residents in Orono purchased their properties, they were given assurances by the City through their zoning, their guidance, and the Comprehensive Plan that the property they have invested in would remain intact. Mazer stated he believes the City of Orono has continually reaffirmed the principles set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and these principles directly relate to the planned development of Lakeview Golf Course. Orono is unique and has a number of talented residents and resources to preserve what is important. Mazer encouraged the City Council to listen to the voice of the people and take the time to consider the impact, the options, and the alternatives to this request. Steve Bell, 4455 West Branch Road, stated he has resided in Orono for approximately 23 years. Bell noted he sent a Ietter to the Council members earlier today and that he would like that letter to be made part of the record. Bell stated he is deeply concerned if this development proposal goes through that the fantastic experience in Orono with its open space and rural character will end. Bell commented people have the right to dispose of their property as they please, but that even in a democracy few rights are unlimited and they should be balanced against the rights of everyone in the community. Page 19 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) 0/BIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Bell stated his specific request to the City Council tonight is to ask that the approval deadline be extended for 60 days as permitted by Minnesota Statutes to allow for an adequate amount of time to explore reasonable and economic viable alternatives for the golf course and to properly vet the environmental issues. The seller is maintaining and the Planning Commission seems to be supporting the concept that the golf course is no longer economically viable. Bell noted he has not seen any facts on the record to support this premise and there does not seem to be any factual basis to support three of Staff s findings on this matter. Bell noted approximately a dozen years the City, the DNR, and a group of private residents were able to save and preserve significant acreage in the Orono Saga Hill area and turn it into permanent park land. The Saga Hill battle took a lot of hard work and creativity. While this developer mentioned leaving a legacy, the City should ask whether the kind of legacy they want to leave is like that of Saga Hill or whether they want to create a legacy where Orono starts to look a lot like Plymouth or Edina. Bell stated the development is out of character with the neighborhood, the City, and inconsistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Bell stated that principle is at stake depending on what action the Council takes tonight and in future meetings and that everyone has a moral and legal obligation to prevent a quick decision on something that is irrevocable that may affect future generations, if not centuries to come. George Daniels, 1375 Park Drive, stated over the years he has walked his dog past the golf course and he always thought, what a beautiful spot, and that he could envision a high-end residential community going in there some day. Daniels stated nobody wants to see a business go downhill and that they all love the open land and open space. Daniels stated the people who want to preserve the golf course, from what he has read, do not make a lot of sense since they already have the Orono Golf Course. Daniels stated in his view there are plenty of places to play golf and that they ought to be looking at the people that are coming forward tonight. Daniels stated the developers have hired the best landscape architects and are very qualified. The developer wants to construct a viable, upscale, beautiful community, and that they are asking to cluster the houses to get 59 units in there so it is not two -acre lots all over the place. Daniels noted there is approximately 142 acres of land available and 118 buildable acres. Daniels stated from what he knows about the land development business, it is a long process and that they have to go through a number of government agencies, which does not happen overnight. The local residents knew the golf course was there, but now that people have stepped forward who want to take a risk, they want to delay it. Daniels stated in his view the residential development is a good use of the property. The golf course does not provide that much revenue to the City but 59 housing units will. If each lot generates $10,000, that is a lot of revenue for Orono. Page 20 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Daniels stated in his view this is a good project and that he would ask the City Council to move ahead on the Comprehensive plan amendment and keep the application moving forward. Stephen Hosmer, 1040 West Cove Lane, Minnetrista, stated he and his wife moved out to this area for the open space. The area is beautiful and is a jewel in the crown of Orono. A site like this is not found anywhere else in the City. Hosmer stated the presentations by the potential developer were excellent and provided a vision of what the development could be. Hosmer stated he would like to step back for a minute and go back to the first part of the application, which is the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The Comprehensive flan was done in the form of a promise to the community and the surrounding communities that this is what the people in the community could expect going forward. It says if open space becomes available, the City should attempt to acquire that open space. What has happened is that a group of concerned citizens have gotten together to come up with alternatives to the housing development and retain the open space. Hosmer stated the only way that can happen is if the residents are given an opportunity to come up with their own concepts. Hosmer noted the consultant indicated retaining the current open space is not viable, but is that known for a fact. Hosmer asked whether residents have been given an opportunity to see if there are other ways to retain the open space. The consultant also said that continued use of the golf course is not feasible. Hosmer stated while the current way of running the golf course may not be feasible, there perhaps are other ways that it could become financially feasible. Hosmer stated the last point the consultant ,said was that the City cannot compel a single property owner to provide public area or space. Hosmer noted the group is not asking the Council to compel the owner to maintain this open space but that they are requesting an opportunity to acquire the space from him and make him financially whole. The group is saying they will find a way where his needs will be met and the directives of the Community Management Plan can also be followed, which is to keep, encourage, and acquire open space. Hosmer stated the Mayor indicated on the previous application that the development would be a short- term gain for the developer which sometimes comes at the long-term expense of the City or words to that effect. Hosmer stated in his view that is the case here. The developer will come in and be gone but Orono will be left with that property. If you look over this contiguous section of approximately 120 acres consisting of woods and open space, it will not be the same as houses clustered between roads and cul-de- sacs. The City Council has a responsibility to consider that under the Community Management Plata and how it will affect the community going forward. The City Council owes it to the residents to give them 60 days to come up with alternatives. The residents only just became aware of the proposal recently and that the decision should be tabled for 60 days so the residents can develop something on their own. Page 21 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Robyn Johnson, 4730 North Arm Drive, stated she is here to ask the City Council to uphold the recreational guidance for a golf course or delay the decision. The residents that are here tonight represent hundreds of acres of land that is worth millions of dollars and many of them are here because they feel the cart is before the horse. The residents know this is a lovely piece of land that is sandwiched between two bays of Lake Minnetonka which the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District currently classifies as a C plus or C minus in terms of water quality. The Watershed District restricts swimming and recreational activities in both of these bays at times due to the nitrogen content of the water. Both of these bays are within the 1,000 square foot restriction but they are actually within 100 to 200 feet of that. The topography is extraordinary. As the consultant said tonight, the data is preliminary and the residents have not known about the details of this project for more than 30 days. Johnson indicated she read on the City's website that the City Council is elected to fashion policies that determine this community's present and future well being, which extends to this moment in time and goes for this time and hundreds of years from now. Orono benefits today from significant tax revenue. The City receives seven million in taxable revenues with a balanced budget. Johnson stead she read in the paper last weekend that Orono is ranked towards the top in the country for median values due to a number of reasons. Johnson stated she does not believe there is a financial imperative that Orono's housing be expanded immediately. Johnson stated the application that has been presented to the City Council is an investment backed exemption that would not stand up in a court of law if the City denied the property owner the right to sell, The application is based on a concept and not an engineered plan. The sketch plan has been described by the consultant as an illustration of an idea. The City Council's decision will leave many unanswered questions relating to traffic safety, watershed and wetlands, water quality, aquifers, flooding stormwater management, lake pollution, population expansion, marketability of homes, depreciation of land values, city infrastructure, crime, and fire protection. Johnson stated the resulting aesthetics will be that the neighbors will be looking at the backside of these homes that will encroach into their skyline vision. Johnson stated this development will have an aesthetic impact no matter how much green space is around it. Johnson stated the citizens of Orono pay a premium to live here and that they benefit from the Community Management Plan. The citizens elected the members to the City Council to implement the objectives of the Community Management Plan. Johnson stated to her knowledge Orono has never developed a subdivision of this magnitude. Gaffron indicated there has not been a similar development. Johnson noted the Eagan development is not located between bodies of water and does not contain the same number of homes as what is being proposed. This property was never put on the market and nobody was given the opportunity to determine whether there is another use for it. Johnson stated there are a number of issues that need to be further explored prior to changing the zoning and that in her view this plan is not compatible with existing and future land uses or in the best interests of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 22 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARMDRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Michael Flannery, 525 Park Lane, stated the first inkling the community had was a letter that the Wenksterns placed on the counter of the golf course stating that the golf course was being sold for development. Flannerty stated in his view the Wenksterns had an alternative and could have said that the golf course is no longer viable, can the community help us out. Instead, the community was presented with the idea that this land would be sold for residential development. Flannery noted the developer's drainage plan failed to show that the watershed drains into North Arm as well. Rene Sternau, 440 North Arm Drive, stated he now has a mound system because his percolation system failed by three-eighths of an inch. Sternau stated the City's engineer spent about a half hour to an hour discussing how the water runs into North Arm and that the City of Orono requires it to be kept at a certain percolation level that it was designed for. Stenau stated it is his feeling the builders will do a lot of that, but that there are so many questions that are still left unanswered. Once the guiding is changed, it will be gone. Sternau stated he would like to have those answers prior to the guiding being changed and that he is here tonight to support the other residents who oppose the guiding change. Terry Johnson, 543 Park Lane, stated he is a professional hydrologist and that he is wondering what the amount of sewage calculation would be for 59 homes. Johnson stated his numbers show somewhere between five to ten million gallons annually. Johnson stated he heard these would be private septic systems and that he was wondering if the applicant has calculated the amount of sewage that would be generated from 59 homes. Hiller indicated they are still at the preliminary plat stage. Johnson commented this is one example that illustrates a need for this type of information at this stage in the process because in his view it is probably at least five million gallons annually. Johnson stated there was a reason the homes in the area are connected to the sewer system and one of those reasons is so that it would not impact the water quality. Johnson stated as a professional hydrologist, he finds it surprising they would be using that type of design next to the largest recreational lake in this area. Dan Iverson, 4640 North Arm Drive, stated he has lived here for approximately 30 years, and that he lives in this area because of the open space and rolling hills, which is what he thought Orono stood for. Iverson stated this application is in the City Council's hands, and if they go down this slippery slope, they could be setting a very dangerous precedent. Once that precedent is set, Orono will be hard pressed to prevent future development of other golf courses. Iverson stated his property has a bird's eye view of the golf course since he lives on high ground. Iverson stated the drawings minimize the size of the ponds and the drainage. The golf course has hundreds and hundreds of feet of tiling, which prevents it from flooding. The land is more suitable for recreational land, ponds, wildlife refuge, or other options. Page 23 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Iverson commented surgeons like to cut, civil engineers like to build, and developers like to develop, but Roy Rogers once said, buy land, they don't make it anymore. Iverson stated while the drawings are nice, it does not show what will happen once you put all these clustered houses in. Iverson stated in his view it will not be quite the rosy picture the developer likes to paint and that he would be surprised if the developer could take their projected 59 lots and actually create 59 two -acre lots. Iverson stated the land is one step above or equal to the land where a holding pond would go. Iverson noted the development of Red Oaks is going to be a huge impact in itself and that it would not hurt Orono to take a sit back and wait approach to see what that impact is. Steve Bren, North Arm Drive, stated the residents and City needs the answers to the questions raised and that these questions should be answered prior to making a decision on amending the Comprehensive Plan. Bren stated in his view the citizens deserve 60 days to look at alternatives and that they have some good ideas as well as a lot of power and energy. Bren stated the Comprehensive Plan is the very foundation of why a number of people live here, and to alter that only based on a sketch is irresponsible to the citizens, the sellers, and the buyers. Given the possibilities of losing this open space, Bren stated it warrants further research. Bren asked how presenting a housing sketch plan meets the current 2008-2030 Community Management Plan and whether it provided the City and its residents with compelling reasons to amend the vision of the community. Bren acknowledged the Wenkstern family has the right to sell their land but questioned whether this is the only viable option. Bren stated in his opinion there are other options available if the residents are given the time to research it. Bren indicated he is also wondering whether a comprehensive marketing plan should be conducted to see if it supports this type of housing. The City does not want a project that will languish and stall leaving Orono citizens with a failed housing project. In addition, further study needs to be done to determine whether the current road structure will support all of the traffic corning out of Red Oak as well as an additional fifty some homes coming out of Lakeview. The development will impact the surrounding road system by adding to the amount of traffic in the area and alter existing traffic patterns. Bren commented he is not sure whether the relocation of the road to North Arm will be a final decision and that the driveway location has yet to be determined. Bren stated there are a number of people who are worried that the drawings that are before the City Council will not be at all what the end project will look like. Bren stated a delay in reaching a decision allows the developer to supply more information about the viability of his proposal and offers Orono an opportunity to research alternatives that are in line with the Community Management Plan. Carol Pass, 2536 -18'h Avenue South, Minneapolis, stated the Metropolitan Council wants Orono to bring in denser housing and that in her view the City of Orono will do it in a responsible way. Pass indicated she has worked hard to get a park for the children in Minneapolis and that Minneapolis has the best park system in the nation. Every kid in Minneapolis can walk to a park, which will likely not happen here. Page 24 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARMDRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANRE VIEW, Continued) Pass stated the children should have access to a park. Pass stated she would encourage the City Council to think of people who do not have open land and that this is a legacy that should not be missed. Pass stated the elected officials and city staff should be more outspoken about the need for more open space. Ryan Bennett, 4680 North Arm Drive, stated he specifically left Eden Prairie and came to Orono for more space, and that he would specifically echo the comments made by the Johnsons at the beginning of the meeting. Dean Mitchell, 740 North Arm Drive, stated he would also like to echo what the Johnsons stated. Mitchell noted there is a stormwater pipe that drains from under the golf course onto his property and that he would encourage the City Council to conduct the proper environmental study as part of any residential development. Bill Bockmann, 1130 Loma Linda Avenue, stated he has lived here since he was four and that he has known Grant for over 50 years. Bockmann stated he would like to see Grant Wenkstern made whole but that options for the property is the key word, Bockmann asked whether the City still owns Big Island. McMillan indicated there is a city -owned park on Big Island and that the Watershed District owns an easement over a large part of the property. Bockmann asked if there is an option with Lakeview where the City could make it a hiking trail or something. McMillan stated the City Council will discuss the application and its options after the public comments. Bridget Hamlin, 4665 West Branch, stated there are many residents that are on the other side of the golf course that feel the same as those residents on North Arm. Isaac Will, 1369 North Arm, stated he has recently moved here to Orono and that a big part of deciding to move back here was the guiding of the land and the open spaces and dark skies. Will stated in his view it is important for the City Council to take sufficient time to consider all the ramifications before it is too late. Page 25 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/R/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTANDSKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) Julie Ruegemer, 1295 Loma Linda Avenue, stated over the weekend a set of sad and disappointed neighbors came over to her house to sign the petition asking Orono to do the environmental assessment on the impact of this large housing development that they want to have take over Lakeview. Each of their responses was the same - they are sick about what is slated to happen. When seven houses were slated to go up in the lovely wooded section of Minnie Avenue, the community was sick about that, too, but were told by the City Council it was going to happen anyway because it was zoned for seven houses on 50 -foot lots. Their voices were not heard. Now a developer wants to put 60 houses in at Lakeview where it is guided for open space. The Planning Commission has already voted to change that guidance. In the blink of an eye, land that we thought was safe is on its way to being developed. Developing all of our land is very short-sighted and pretty soon it will be gone. Ruegemer stated another parcel of land in Minnesota that many of us enjoy is the Boundary Waters canoe area and all that would have been gone, too. A man named Edward Backus tried to develop it, but thanks to God someone else was not shortsighted and saw the future opportunity of enjoyment by the people and a number of people worked tirelessly to save this land for natural enjoyment. Noerenberg Gardens is another example of land that may be taken for granted, but if it had not been for Laura Noerenberg Hoppe bequeathing that land on Lake Minnetonka, that land would also be gone, taken over by developers. Instead, she had far-reaching vision. She saw that she could preserve this land for people to enjoy for all time. A group of people recently thought to save some private precious land in Frog Town, St. Paul. They were able to get a 1.5 million dollar grant from the public trust for land. They received gifts and city matching and they were able to save that land for public enjoyment. The sellers also got their money. Ruegemer stated if we want this land preserved, we have to fight and work for change. The Planning Commission has already voted to change the guidance on this piece of property in the blink of an eye. We live in the City because we believe in the philosophy that Orono has stated. We voted for our Council members because we believed they would uphold the philosophy of Orono. The philosophy of Orono is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, the water quality and its recreational assets, protect and preserve our many natural resources and open spaces, preserve our distinct rural and urban land use patterns and lifestyles, preserve our local character and identity. Our identity is going to go out the window if we cannot even follow our own philosophy. Ruegemer stated they can raise the money through Orono's residents, grants, and perhaps even city snatching funds. We can buy this land and give it to the Three Rivers Park District for the enjoyment of all people. Lakeview could be a pristine place for biking, hiking, walking dogs, rollerblading, playing, etc. Let's save this land and keep Orono from becoming like every other suburb. Let's follow our own philosophy. Donna Hager, 4580 West Branch Road, stated they originally purchased their property 50 years ago for the open space. They have enjoyed their property all of those years and they would hate to lose that wonderful amenity that the residents enjoy. It is something that cannot be replaced. Once it is gone to a housing development, it is forever gone. Page 26 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. ##13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PATHILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) Hager stated in her view the Council should, at the very least, grant 60 days for the group to investigate and come up with some ideas, to do less than that would be irresponsible. Hager stated she would urge the Council to keep the current guidance that was put wisely into the Comprehensive Plan. That planning not only preserves what we have now but goes forward to younger generations and preserves what we have in Orono, which is what makes Orono a special place. Mayor McMillan closed the public comment portion at 10:07 p.m McMillan encouraged the residents to continue to provide the City Council with any additional comments via e-mail or phone. McMillan stated there are two items before the City Council tonight. One is the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the second is the sketch plan for a housing development. Levang indicated she would prefer to discuss the item separately and to discuss the Comprehensive Plan amendment first. Printup asked what the opinion of the City Attorney is regarding the 60 -day delay City Attorney Poehler stated if the Council feels it needs additional time to make a decision, it has a right to request an extension of the review period. After that period of time, the City would need to get permission from the applicant or take final action. Levang asked if it needs to be specified what will be accomplished in that 60 -day period. Poehler stated the Council should have some general indication of what it is they are looking for Printup stated in regard to the issues that have been raised relating to pedestrian safety, stormwater, septic, environmental and bilIability, are things that will change and a number of plans will be brought before the City Council. Printup stated he is not comfortable with that and that he would like to see something more realistic and what the housing development will actually look like once the data is arrived at. Printup indicated he is comfortable with the 60 -day delay, which will give time for the grassroots movement and also give the City Council the information to make a better decision. Printup moved, Levang seconded, to table Application No. 13-3638 and 13-3639, Source Land Capital, LLC, on behalf of Grant Wenkstern (Lakeview Golf), 405 North Arm Drive, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan Review, for 60 days. McMillan asked if an environmental assessment would be required in this situation. Grittman stated it is not required by state law since this development does not meet those thresholds. The minimum would be 100 housing units. McMillan noted Spring Hill Golf Course required an EAW to build a golf course Page 27 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Grittman stated within the EAW rules there is a category for creation of golf courses. McMillan noted a marketing plan was also mentioned, and asked whether this is a situation where it would be helpful for that to be done Grittman stated he has seen situations where cities have requested for some market research data to document the economic viability of the project. Grittman stated that happens more commonly with commercial development rather than residential. Grittman stated there are probably some factors in the City's zoning rules to support a preliminary plat application but it is not unheard of to seek that type of information. McMillan stated if there is a 60 -day delay, they would be looking at the January City Council meeting. Grittman noted the 60 -day extension would end on January 24 and that the Council meeting would be on January 13. Michael Flannery asked if the fact that an EAW is not required mean that one cannot be requested. McMillan stated to her understanding the Council can request one if they feel it is necessary. Poehler stated it would be at the discretion of the Council if they feel it is necessary to make their decision. McMillan stated it would depend on the type of development being proposed, and that if it is different than a two -acre lot development, that it might be something to consider. Levang indicated she is in favor of doing an EAW if it makes sense to do it. McMillan stated she believes there should be a good reason for requiring something rather than simply adding costs to a development. McMillan stated it is important to be fair with a person's property rights and that she would hate to add more expense to the developer and property owner if it is not truly necessary. Levang stated she would prefer to go through the 60 days and then determine at that point whether an EAW is appropriate. Printup stated the 60 -day delay would preserve the high status that has been given to the City's Comprehensive Plan as well as allow time for review of other alternatives and additional time to digest the information that is provided. Page 28 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. 413-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKS TERN (LA KEVIE W GOLF), 405 NOR THARMDRI VE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Anderson commented there are a lot of moving parts in this application currently and that she has heard a number of comments from the residents that should be evaluated. Anderson stated she would like to make sure the Council makes the proper decision on the application and whether an EAW should be required. Anderson stated the additional time would allow the Council to examine the information and not violate anyone's property rights, which are very critical pieces. McMillan asked whether any information will be available on the soil tests and at what point some of this data will be received on the viability of the development. Grittman stated that type of information is usually provided at the time of preliminary plat application. Grittman indicated the City Council could ask what information the developer has obtained so far and that perhaps some preliminary information could be provided. Levang stated she would like to see as much of that information as early as possible in order for the City Council to make an analysis on how many units will be buildable. McMillan stated it would help provide an idea of how much open space would be available and that she would like to know what is being proposed as it relates to the public amenity. McMillan stated she does not feel it is something that should be a ball and chain for the Wenksterns but that it is a balancing act between the two, McMillan stated she would like to discuss the housing development aspect prior to voting on the motion. Levang noted the Council has received a lot of phone calls and e-mails and that the City Council appreciates all the thought the residents have put into this. Levang stated the City Council does not operate in a vacuum and that they need to hear from the residents. Levang indicated she has attempted to respond to each of the residents who has contacted her and that the Council does need to hear about the options that are being considered. Levang stated this is a huge decision for the Council and the Council members take it seriously and want to do the best job they can. McMillan stated the developer would like some thoughts regarding the PRD and that she does not want to leave them up in the air for 60 days. Levang stated she can understand why clustering is being proposed and that it presents a prettier picture than the two acre sites. Levang stated she has great concerns about the septic and the ability of the property to percolate. Levang indicated she lives on a parcel that consists of eight acres but that most of it is wetlands. Levang stated when her septic went down, they had a very difficult time finding a second site. Levang indicated she is very concerned about one acre lots and how viable they will be over time. Page 29 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTANDSKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Levang stated she also is concerned about the views this development will have. Levang stated the houses will be at everyone's sightlines and those views will be destroyed. Levang stated she would like to see more than a one acre site. Levang stated water quality and other issues will need to be addressed at some point, but at this time septic is the main issue. Anderson concurred that clustering is a novel idea but that septic sites are a huge concern. The drainage and runoff into either bay, which are very close to Lake Minnetonka, will cause additional problems relating to water quality, runoff to the neighbors in addition to the traffic and pedestrian foot traffic issues. Anderson stated there are a number of issues tied to this development and that she is not sure whether the developer will be able to answer all of them. Printup stated nobody has the answers to those questions here tonight and that he would like less speculation before malting a decision on the clustering or one -acre lots. Printup stated another option is the two -acre minimum that the site is zoned for. Printup stated he does not want to put the cart before the horse before the actual numbers are determined. Anderson stated she is still stuck on the Comprehensive Plan and that in her view it is the Council's duty to protect and preserve the Comprehensive Plan. Anderson indicated she is not ready to discuss many of these details. McMillan stated a big piece of Orono's philosophy is to create two acre lots with their own septic that was created back in the 1970s. The city founders decided to make it two acre lots without city sewer, which is really at the heart of Orono's philosophy and Comprehensive Plan. McMillan indicated she is not comfortable with a PRD or one -acre density since it basically goes against that philosophy. McMillan stated two acres might not be big enough for some of the sites given the drain tile and that golf courses were constructed at a time when a person could tile over wetlands. McMillan stated some of the land may also be classified as wetlands once it is tested, which will require buffers and setbacks. McMillan stated that is an example of the data that perhaps could be found out in the next 60 days. McMillan stated this is a wonderful opportunity, if this site does become a housing development, to have it be one that incorporates resource management and possibly bringing back and restoring wetlands and creating better stormwater opportunities for Lake Minnetonka. McMillan stated in her view the Watershed District will be very helpful in that regard and future maintenance that should be required. Page 30 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. ##13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCELAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) McMillan stated one of the key points would be to have a conservation design done on this property to identify the various natural resources on the site, which may change the location of the lots and the number of lots. McMillan stated the developer could look at perhaps three or four total private roads that do not connect with maybe ten homes on them rather than one road that winds through the entire development. McMillan stated she does not want to see curb and gutter and that clustering would look out of character. McMillan noted this land is in the middle of the country, and if it is developed, it needs to have a more rural character. McMillan indicated she would not be opposed to changing the zoning to five acres but that she is opposed to changing it to one acre lots. As land continues to get built up around the Cities, more and more people will come out to Orono looking for open space and wildlife corridors. McMillan stated in her view the aesthetics of a cluster development do not work in this environment. Levang noted she also is not in favor of the clubhouse or a gated community and that she is in agreement with Mayor McMillan that it should be a more rural environment. Anderson stated she would like to see if there are any trails within the development that could be open to the public and that she would prefer to see some kind of trail or shoulder along County Road 19. Anderson indicated she never envisioned this property as being anything but open space and that perhaps the City Council should consider five acre zoning for this area since it has been more historically rural and open space in character. Gaffron stated the City's five acre zone is the northwest quadrant of the City and that this property does not touch it and is surrounded by two -acre zoning. Gaffron stated he would not call it spot zoning necessarily but that it would be creating something that is not in character with what is immediately around it. Anderson stated it currently is open space, which is also not totally compatible with the surrounding land. McMillan asked if a resolution of approval should be available at the City Council meeting on January 13. Gaffron noted action would need to be taken at the January 13 meeting before the 60 days are up. Levang asked if it could be tabled at that time. Gaffron stated the applicant would need to agree to an extension if the City Council wanted to table it. Gaffron indicated Staff would like some direction from the Council on what type of resolution the City Council would like to see prepared. Poehler stated action to approve or deny the resolution would need to be taken on January 13 containing the findings of the Council. Hiller asked what the Council would like to see happen in the next 60 days from them and the community. Hiller noted the golf course is not legally for sale at the present time and that the property is currently under contract. Hiller indicated in the next 60 days the golf course is not going to be for sale. Page 31 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (8. #133638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENOMENTAND SKETCH PLANREVIEW, Continued) Hiller stated he is hearing that the clustering is not a preference and that the Council would prefer the two -acre zoning and layout. Anderson stated she would like to entertain higher acreage requirements. Printup stated he is talking about the Comprehensive Plan amendment being delayed, which will give the developer time to come up with a different type of layout, such as five or two acres. Hiller stated they are following the process that was outlined by the City for them to follow. Hiller indicated the work and economics are very different on a two -acre development versus a five -acre development and that their preparations were done on a two -acre minimum. Hiller stated they have not submitted an application to increase the size of the lots but merely for the Council to look at the guiding of the land. Hiller stated in the five -acre zoning would be inconsistent with the current zoning and that he is not sure what they would need to do to satisfy the Council's concerns. Printup stated those are good questions and that they need to be answered at some point. Hiller stated there are a number of possibilities but that he is not clear what he should be working on. Levang stated a lot of it will be driven by the septic testing. Hiller stated the septic has to be tested in three or four spots on each of the lots, and that absent a final design, it is expensive to do the septic testing. Hiller indicated the design they have been working on was based on the clustering, which will need to be re-evaluated. Hiller stated it is conceivable they could come back with a design based on two acre lots and the septic testing could be done based on that. McMillan stated the Conservation Design work should also be done and that the City does not allow septic sites in wetland buffers. McMillan stated in her view the conservation overlay is one of the first things to be done and the fact that it has not been done is somewhat troubling. The conservation outlay will also help identify setbacks and wetlands. McMillan stated they may end up with some odd lots or odd sized parcels which is something that can be worked out with the Watershed District. McMillan commented there are a lot of unknowns at this point and that the conservation design needs to be done before the application gets too further down the road. McMillan stated in addition she does not want to see roads coming off of County Road 19 given the speed of the traffic. Hiller asked if the Council would like to see the conservation design overlay completed and some pert tests done on two -acre lots in the next 60 days. Printup stated that is close but that there is also some thought being given by the Council into the five acre minimum. McMillan asked whether the five -acre zoning would be up to the discretion of the developer. Page 32 of 36 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 o'clock. p.m. (8. 413-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) OIBIO GRANT WENKSTERN (L,4KEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTHARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SKE TCH PLAN RE VIE W, Continued) Gaffron noted the current underlying zoning is two acres and that the developer could propose lots that are larger than that. Hitter stated the wetland delineation report is being prepared at this time. McMillan stated it is ultimately up to the developer to decide on whether to create the lots bigger than two acres. Hiller stated it is possible that some of the lots will be larger than two acres. Hiller stated as they look at the site and apply common sense, they will stay away from the natural features that should be protected and preserved. Grittman stated the information being requested is a little more detailed than what is normally provided with a sketch plan but not quite all the detail provided with a preliminary plat. Gaffron noted there is only one City Council meeting in December, and asked whether the City Council would like to see the information prior to January 13. Hiller indicated he is not sure how long the conservation study will take but that in his view they will get pretty close by then. McMillan asked whether a special meeting is an option the Council would like to consider. Anderson stated she is in favor of that and that she would have liked to have had a work session before this to discuss some of these items. Gaffron suggested a special hearing be scheduled for Monday, January 6. Levang asked if that would be enough time for the developer. Hiller stated in his view it probably will be but that he is not sure how long the conservation design will take. McMillan stated the Council would need the information no later than January 2. Printup moved, Levang seconded, to amend the motion on Application Nos. 13-3638 and 13-3639, Source Land Capital, LLC (Pat Hiller) on behalf of Grant Wenkstern (Lakeview Golf Course), 405 North Arm Drive, to table the applications to a special meeting on January 6 at 7 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 33 of 36 F m ...m. rm<, _.e �,^ � F� � ^� h n'A'r�°�', 1 n ^'cis { �i m Item #01 - Special Council Meetin - 01/06/14 L "r.,.'p. � 1 I v rr I i }t SEC' 15 — — "�� � w � ;" ■LEGEND P. hlnrr)TI I A-Iha C- - A-rr 13-3638&1 es 9J sroP�.. RTH ARM-DRNE-x458°-3A `fin„' `X° �L� � J I vvll l rl ni"r IVI C_ I f I C_J A srAnory MAPN >— SAN1001-ER (� sANrcARVMH HEI. WA L--__ �. .,�.'15� "' \-• : - .. ___ � y .'a �\ � \ '•,,, � '^* .,,,,. ,� rv'e'ra .,. ; . „`N ''*. ellumlxcus 4>< 9s'�,,,, r �. i �! ai I! O � rcPArR �a„\y\ :.i., �'• ^^,. ,� �"'' "� � pr,,4 ,,,, °*, �'•',,. .r'•",. ,sea�e� �' ! % + - --- - � W mak, � \ � � "" Eo .•„ � � � , r 91� T r.+.._.. ` I { �'.' IrcM�rP�@'Ixvaea-far, ''^"'''•r. �'a.' .. "-""sao .., lol ��/�/�'�J/ r�a� 41I, PM1rNT - I .,. S,pF..Vi��&LV'M-F�"aN-NL-�_:,K_a �+ ^n / / ' ,, •t BENCH iARRR —N�»— 6TORM SEIVER '1' TEYEPRONE PENESTRL pENGE R- ,,:• BS 0'O\ :ee rJ C Fcu mCIM----vL— TEUFHCNE �e ELECTRIC PE EUAL PSNce L•n w OA a Im.. FIB 1] FO— ER OPTIC N�r�A ELEOTHIG METER yS-.. ,_. y,A. EDGE OF PELINWTEB WELANP l WMLwm'Y49e -.POLF cAry -LE TELEISON [pp TRAN6FORMER W EDGE OF MATER EN4IN ERIN93 0 C EPOTF.LEVAIION -E—E— ELEGTRIO Q,,, LTILIIY POLE : TREE ONE BLDG. n \� i e, GARMH BURVYIN�3 ETMMI s^+1 I a ETMI MH alw— OVERNEno POWf:RENVIRONMENTAL .,- .•.. ., awaacoNroun lNrERvnL EBNo, -ENE" 1 \ \,k• —wv— uNMEROnilOoUuTILITI R i YHICAINeR MNR cavouR INT -AL PLANNING -E. -1P .-1PR CON -11-1110 M, IN, I—Wall 9029 vmlgmeAoOd, 6lml1 s win Edsn Prelrlo MlnNexota 96194 PhAasL 92 4642�1 3,9460960 ` ^'•„''"'• `- •+..� \ }� R DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYE11�D •e111 IA-^-,� R \ _� ,Ver ea:m n w slw,xrrTMMavanry .N Ha r..111,esseaew vrnvr,x,xp,nl *"• 995 \ � _ '� \ `,y :..,..a rPGx?n'c6oux•pnWa,xeA vaMmr°fnnx ex=epxow.e uosa. urmoeoanswroxwnvduNwuvp,F.Emr,ssM1vxne Wensm ederueseuX alarexa:nex we..rwl m., pnofN•NmIA SR I••pr,Ap %1 eele,anee`ev`iu Nvxemc 0rnw rrnVm'I ea Non n>nnONe 1 -�^� � ,e/ / \ a.w a r:e r r aee ,sof rhe . o me a•°�aaw.N m. a m,:rN.•mee.enm e•Xse,n.Nwrrr.Mo,a xwme,xAne.a .easea ,Ea rw I 1 / ..�..,. ci I , . ,,,,, � 4 • .. / f' �'— .� P�r.a{JA.L9� ""* j „��jIN°Y°is,n r7 / y "•'_„ I w f / �/ C- . L,2Res � 1 ` A19 /.r / } \\ I y5 TRAfrT �- { �i `�,,, one°�s.'r'e �: e'w+: A.,. gb' IF"k �•' K F 1"''' ''*\ `'^ '4 \ J. "'+.; '?�Hir plN + F• I PgRCEL 2 I IF yr i,n=ty+, orfiu Nenn.=r °exp. b m. swNn.d OuawwwF„M Wer[,a mer weer Yhpewun,e,m y a t° ennW '.ne xvtwry Rnea Nn +s. Pe.,aTheepeP err;wpmem La a%Irw GwmewealyN%eanur lne daanry Read xe.�x.exe.prnerp.lu:a:.oru:etr+:vtl-n Ry awca Lrnasnvvy Nu rmeil Lrs°Wens 7—p 11r, q x p r ,nerme. (rwrvnvprepmY Tvnm CvnHe•1v rJ.ehw 14nTNl 1PACis „ eurtl a a,e swu, eeloueax m Yes.: X,aeecuav�ad,�xe.a,.,•N quyfi d %09onnmu rluw er d 9rdm a TwnrNN,n, Xeny ss H.r.:ep a cobty M nnvwlq nuXExx u.VN'eN Rif d Y ewN�'wewr v� urrfiv ee,nM1r�vX:hurn x aeetlene, levrnN:lp i, ]p r9e� a�rynenepn naav�M nem° E%eEPTWp Nam fia,ss Ne°doe Weexsm ee11WereefriNenwur se uN aI u,=e��TAv Bux•nv pprrtrel n e 9wm:nee °uanuaru,e swurreM ou:.l:r ds..nw s, mmeh p IIx. ppnesl9, Nwmpn«+,tl MTnnae, N�.erprao.nY nwm.�x.aeeNwmnxs�„� TSA a re.eee axa ree xm.we, w9feeraf a• seal•rnar.p a m.epmmawnva'Nrd Ne aaw,.y.n oax xal eea � N Twa.rnp rn. Rewe m Il.,n.an eormY Mrw.ad+ rer.rdnnm meud:.aare.,ae.emmw:ls,..Y ur.mx- {ror.r:.p:w.rp,Ter..m wmnww wmswewaeq TAACT+ - �.,�„p--' ,p+,'� ��•-^-\ ff t', I_. \ ,�'. I 1 .r^ I 1 �•. �� .'.'\ \ / e,,r^e,,n�n,p°�,axaxppdtiesa:�nw,IM,aden Nerrapncwn%Ma:nww,lananwwemMmmm..m.,f,�xceenv R.=anm,el=.aw..�arydn,. .�/ I ,i In. �' (,�' S / T , .apemNpwN•Geu M1nn uwnxdmeNennwwo-er ernrtl:ewm.xfweaxd¢iaeeimTfea� ...,.•,:�r 1�'m''a-. /!L � �'.i 1• /�jy/ '•'� "+.....- _ � rpl=.ed.'d�dgd"Lanmrn da,t admnnwol,stsmJrvloe rx re edm erinrarenm 1 - uatne / "� �/ N1'q, -^� L. dot mlM1e°.t4envof•eias. ,M1p d=I=re mfn.mpxna«upnr nnuaaedexre anas,puxbme xm.em.n x.=al::e pan,n.aeMa, er�ee j , � �, / 1 / �' / 1 A� '"' 1 / 1 ,;.�� ,�� � �, I�,;;�.-�y,=yr (1 I 1 •,..�'�,� � ._ \ � �`,� Mn � "�a .,etley.��Nem'wm:'�•°no �pdw�'d��d—a,ea, —an•..ap.w, i W `' / 1 3'_ •""+n -r / � �" ' 1 '� T .P"'€q 1.+�96h - eei5''+a \ , ^ L rcnirnnre M. Tcnpn.C•nlMnr. Nwnt.,sewxa, . ._rn I � N � � `"" g 1 I 1 I . /,'/ � �' } � •v`� \ a, �,, �, ,� �.. � I \ \ 1 1 rr /96:1 1 1 ± / / d ��� �,, \. A"^ � �, : \ \ \ :���., °'r..w.. I I I I IIF.::, � °° �' * - \ �„� i \ \ ! / � � � SI / / .� � N,n �•-, � / \ � \ `� M — ��-! � In ,�/ / i t I,NI .-5 < ! � 3 �4��_,} ! I 1 r,- �. � f •_ ? ��� `^-,� 6 \ I C� ��Iz \lair / / I I f I Il I� // (-P �} } �/�-� / { \\ �„� �\ i / • � ���.\ �,..,.� \\ \�/ \ i I \ 1 Lr.a vNA,_\' ,\ M. �'":�,�'"Hr.l "^•.m a_9:. N 11 1 1 ! '� { N�7 y a`''pp rr1b61 p \ 11 A � Q'✓ /� itJ//RACsz�j�✓ 4. 437-02 N3E"47'32W irF.�_'" - l �,}'`' '^” Y` 1 + 1 I i-.`+, IN, _ { T-------------------- sco,Bn----- r rd -'r �' 7 / % I I ( rr` { 1 y ,\N\ _ 9 M1 I ° / \ AA 1 S dy �Mr o I / / 1 1 i I / J r'.�a HSI 'l 9. ” EXCEPTION �,�• \ 4'1 'S �.- I I I I ':'aj L ..J \ / pX m� / i ` \ Yom, } / ! / / / 4�qmm /pwo �: SEW 97' 32lE 467.02 /TRACT 1 Z ` , J /,PARCEL I-,-- / �' 0�// 6a� %L�.�':\ ¢ 11 f SI i N80°32'53•W�- f ! '�•`-� / } -L, n 1d •' ?� 1 r 1 , 11 -1/ / ii ':;'r'- i I - `- _ �: r \ ❑ a 7 % 1 4: Jf . ,,...Ld SEM , , 1 TRACT2 N3a°areo"w 371.91 SEE OETAiL SHEET � , LIJccr(�� 2OF2 SHEETS8 I `d,l� NAlo7)A'j 3.r • S Q3'3a3E SUFIVEYNOTE NI ��S f T R W NMI 03 3a - r-- {`2Gc� - __ _ r' i l ' I rvuvewmnwrei nxliW`rv«a S;A iEXCEPTION �` ewG,,=`)e' l ` r P �i✓—`\` ._ - - - n EXCEPTION R WEST BRANCH ROA❑ (CO. RD, 157) - I NBBe 03' 39"W r ' - T ,I — r — — — — — — e , — % zno.os WEST BRANCH ROAD [Go . RD. 151j 7s3.3a Nao a3' 39"W l I J lVES,T )AKl0 I IA1:7S � �._ � .._ �_-. - -, -_ --. 't - 3 \ � vv l�.:l CiF\nlYv_.r� { {rr L_�.! L�nwvfl{ fTI1L.IL. +---_„-�--'_� A CI\/ 11nln rAE^,rr-r.l{ AnhlTrnNl Ao�arhm VV\71\LIV -NUL/IIiVlN wvNxe.xs ,� R BASIS CF BEARINGS elmeaw wdsnv ea Tmn,M1plll NeM. PanwaY.r Wpsl, sn Nnrdq! Mw ren -s a:wr.d ovx.=be ad n-ae,e2 R DATUM'S N' - nwN eewryema:,x.9yvw N90as lxpMiLe.her C°nu:mM ee ae Mnnxeneapeeepel Mmlalee, cre:md ha'- N4YNaB+ IaAcv,m R SURVEY NOTES 1) p sem rete raexsw the sass"Ins Rw"mnnpro_ppravlPl0. ts6S11ll�3Kv0.1510 WesseranaM1 nE] w Me rexN eluensrNe wbNsa mrn'me"See hpn�W M1m•e",M1er,�n rYa 1pM1�'w twos eanant lnEaXnwywlnuourn ne&peraxpxyEe elryatnennacwnbo:a, nr � rahsG rmn. mora mppemwudnn ImaumneaonamwaNlrne.,xetl un•e, aees.de e,meeNp+..+mew.„l,rrear erarera,.Mn,wmxrrmw,L.n e, rnn,:,,en au. I ntld ne vx rums ev-ale eaen ltxarmla, +I s.bMdmu+wmem1 rwfa .1, erreadlent, NI NI 1-,e5wn M1vwn r. 1. nu s.Eumplex nntlmnPrar Fundedlne a us, eerveY rem a �Sa an yr x. mean ndeneea PF rs:uue{f+,a e.meaell rl . xme vr.e.,m.,.m aemeNeaMh old are Pp„,�,p„mleauaenpw.n aarx e4 Wewve>eJ rw d.:'eJ.wemreewxwl .e ee seam ecnPRexm .u,n band ar edlp ween o Meldlcrn,0 reed nwna A W n epn+awr ¢roe emaaur:yreepmdre evuureuueentl.eud, n.eePynr s am c,poal+wee la Apndvy Wrp°xe w!, B,TM 11 p a rp tl II u om won inrne,om vomvv vuunaaer ee ry-, ey W 1' I filrNEudnw Irnpwmae ee Nweroan adpnen nAlwwe.xivaw sap I epee was „rllnlYnernrunl, eH�u eemax °'.Mays per ueaq Nwa,,.e,amu, ehvae x'+R � mm or n`b+eaws ewewen v.wmasenneca.veY�r nee,auua &3EG EeROYPPrHcoop 1e-00¢iv0glg4 ErTIONsI K,exwNa unn$xAneawase. ueeef °omwae.etm Taef.o:e a4vm:d Tays eV ery ry a=yaS mhpr v v'or= v h rp N1 fn,sxb.0 AgrlWVWl r>N�AV£uo.r. nssfroKA gvsMRYeY xx.., ou<ne oNmew,."nfwe. o:rvo vmwmx, �r+a rno, efi,rufer&Isw[nrtron rtrver4 '�AM1o•s vram wc�nrrots:pwo,ne=tryfS� AY¢YHEGTE0. nwme.. n Dods xpnsk -2 + Ns:NSNsve•naxATa'q See Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets for additional Survey Notes... ■ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION Tp s°nnim Lm.Ae,r MaI ar«rax wa arAm.,=e=e.,per= e„ =m a wmr ne a.arwme.,m=:Y nw wylxeeafiee:..q �Yt rh'ni•nee•err•�N mu InarwMmn nMu•xp„Arn xvr saruw ouW KegAn::wvu iw ALTM1°ACeMia yr,ln e.a p bA n1,TA NeNaP9.,alrcinMehnm, e, s. i. s, e[al n s,Mbl. ,a ex ,s aT>a nn.�m1Ywines d,mhv, xvo tlHeuaanxwee:xerxa, xxp_ RemerMw Ne.e.XN:. �¢rn GRAPHIC SCALL 1D0 0 5G Iqf} 2q0 N FEET } 1 Inch - 100 leei. VICINITY MAP ,RM os W BRANCH RD cRRNN�w LN PROJECT' Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN. 9TIT,RT ALTA/ACS M Land Title Survey M I)AIE IILVISION 1. 12 �13�BBundery Lelall 1F�N Mfifuita ILET-01irl,W'FI RR ]PTTs —T on RKT•Or1R MY FIIRPARPO 9VNiRWER ONAN 11MI 1,1 1)LPYI.lr, F, NANOTTSAT1AMA IIIII.YIOR )ND PROIHL& NAL RIAN'EYTEl=OR i0FHlN E5 TAr OP TE S>: SPA'1'G OP MINNE80TA. DKFZ R VY113iwus RLGISTMTION NOh113E11 4150,9 DRAWN BY C1 MCKED BY LCC MRW PA.TIN PIIOJLC14 M6 2613/11126 2013-018.1 R 0 3I-IEFFNUMBER 1 OF 2 , F i �' ' Ir9Y:99G,19 11b., �\ / el Y9, RS V A E CEFTION` Ss@�rBsy- °r 57238.70\.�Ta 1s'42ee )P_h- h g�P 1s \k U j /IN>.95a1e If e� Pg- l ` ` I ti \•� 5. �8 non rra., NOS' U4'18W °aSgeag„Pli ria. 1 v r� Ilk OM1' pj II ivy i �'`t SE711 I / L_ it LEGEND ams 0 e An ON NARK -0- NENCH MARK O F. ACCIM FOUND Ip C\s FLAOPOM ,819 SPOTELEVATICN O s OMMH a "TABLE All NOTES _ ,.R"e.a mele�.em,emul.ex�eaew.ru,.Mepe�w..He,•Nr.edn�hea. N.Nr>.e,ro. ,' n rbnNFrx.�aMue rv.nnrvm cr.a.�., r.IN. sl ii,I�aPr'`n�nil� FaPoxen.Nmr..raeler.m.a"r.P.n=ane",a+. errNH=nRI.e �Ivemlam..e.;9,.Na �, R.vak•Wonn Pei,n� ; iow.aaesaeeafaE. xan..PH eewW, rA,unu,e, n,vixn.ati, k. rex.d E�..me..q Alee.Ge�..t <I wnl•etPRP.^II.G,teGA65 ePR or "e,J-IGAu.w �•.urRad ]1 tllar.-0�El lem. 9a elR�a i,:ae.aR-xexe«rxl:�i o n"an""a.r.nrt�w.:.,I,er+a.i.ua..P�".an.� r..e o wr ..tneser.. .�In. C� .1 E,R .:Ie.. «-.RSI, Ra:x.Na 14 arla yse¢eai, � e Rxt IPF.rI e ,onNY�a a ee sienee er oo CO TNainkrmxlunnva nol pePitlaa M-nwnr. Cenull V,a City Nwning Aawn*wl IocmlimrMaM1•r ornutlarllrlr m:rNe n ...die. mMie, rel AvarvrvnmamvY ei ned�wen rnae�iveae mn�eln i.veexlnntln„E'.ervnrynewreYetl onverNve enervn Mrwe, evraervaYkan M, IsAbINe��9el atlbniw xeN4nnealan9anow.an9"tuna,tpuhlM ntorde. Aa SM1o�m On Sxrvy, , iN•reune.NNne•Nwn•nt.=rv,m nna mt, k. ne rnme..aen el hdla�.e e�avl lne one d,nl. vy Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01306114 File #13-3638 ages 99] ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING a 6ANITART6EWER ® SANITARYMH ors- GAC --�M-»� ETORM EEWER '�s IELEPHDN. PECEKTAL -� FENCE m TELEPHONE" ELECTRIC PE6EBTAL FENCE -F°- REEEFC`F- p ELECT METER EDGE OFRELINIATEONET— -CMV - CAELETELEA%CN E TPNNSPORMER -14 EB.D OF WATER -C -E--- ELECTRIC CO: UTILITY P9X .. -. TREE LINE Gxn- OVERHEAR POWER U GAS MH -- -- MAJOG CCNTOWR INTERVAL ---StP---�- VNCEROROJNO POKER I] OA6 me'e, MlraOp cCNNUR INTERVAL wu OVERMEAC IrtIJTY 7( HYDRANT 44 WATER METER CONCRETE cu9RWo -�---�---I---- wArsq slaty CP DETAIL SCALE: lei = Bar f IANn bE_Rl8Pn PPkt.0, NO, zY .. NW GOR E, 156'----, ! l { r l NE COR E. 156'-: /Vgrnz2-rz8E m�a'42 EI B.Innl6MENTeR1 ___ , 200 �------------ ------ _ ___. 550 -- TRACT 3, 15�LMM 159 - cel [EXCERPTION ' mo o J 1 Cl) m I �I r i5"CMP INV:934.58 IMCNVh1ENTE0 7. En5EMEW 592523 T, 200.08 WEST BRANCH ROAD - - ` - E V6, INc. 10x00Valley Vlew Fuad, 1,61x3 Eden P.,", Mlnnewlx 65]44 Fllane:BYefrfi6-0838 Fest: 962&/e4260 Nvnv.or:nn Q,wui 100 50 1 0 2 0 IN FEET ) I Inch - 100 feel. VICINITY MAP N ARM RR Site W BPANCH R6 � REC MAK LN cRANRMcw Av PROD= Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN. 3]01701' ALTAIACSIN Land Title Survey aR DATE REVISION 1, 12Y5.13�Bountlary Oelnll . I HKIlltRY CRIi'T LNv" IAI"l I lIa PI.nN oR RU-OIt'l' W A As eRliYnli>:u YMR; SONLANMYATTA I' 9i1FERVI910N ANO TI IAT i AM A M. SUAVE UJF UN IpIIOPE IAS NO TIFEB.TORIINBFKNEt ITA. Or TI IRST'ATE OI' h91NNB9(]TA� DATE) 101$0,nn REGI 2013!1x103 REGISTIteSTION NVMIlIiR 8409.6 O12A1WN BY CHECKED BY LCC MRW DATE CONTROL POINT DATA 2013111126 2013-016.1 POINT NUMBER FULL DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 00 OF PRSWW148810 175417874 508259,548 014.947 5133 CP CP6133 165600732 433140.0001 008.270 16910 CP 104405.030 434714.631 034.732 15917 CP 193076.851 434085.018 1 076.330 16918 CP 193096.081 436025.2251 068.184 15910 CP 193235.550 435139.100 000.030 16620 CP 103186.300 435255.110 009.071 20161 CP CP20101 105006.704 433138.032 886.923 20102 CP OP20152 165762.204 4334x3,561 074,942 20164 CP CP20164 105716.820 i 4337142581 071.306 20166 OR OP20165 105682.762 [ 433448871 , 066.123 20106 CP CP201 06 105177.701 432638,104, 975.105 20107 CP CP20157 165712.603 4329005001 000.402 20670 CP20076SPt 163617.640 433800.001 j 001.021 DETAIL SCALE: lei = Bar f IANn bE_Rl8Pn PPkt.0, NO, zY .. NW GOR E, 156'----, ! l { r l NE COR E. 156'-: /Vgrnz2-rz8E m�a'42 EI B.Innl6MENTeR1 ___ , 200 �------------ ------ _ ___. 550 -- TRACT 3, 15�LMM 159 - cel [EXCERPTION ' mo o J 1 Cl) m I �I r i5"CMP INV:934.58 IMCNVh1ENTE0 7. En5EMEW 592523 T, 200.08 WEST BRANCH ROAD - - ` - E V6, INc. 10x00Valley Vlew Fuad, 1,61x3 Eden P.,", Mlnnewlx 65]44 Fllane:BYefrfi6-0838 Fest: 962&/e4260 Nvnv.or:nn Q,wui 100 50 1 0 2 0 IN FEET ) I Inch - 100 feel. VICINITY MAP N ARM RR Site W BPANCH R6 � REC MAK LN cRANRMcw Av PROD= Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN. 3]01701' ALTAIACSIN Land Title Survey aR DATE REVISION 1, 12Y5.13�Bountlary Oelnll . I HKIlltRY CRIi'T LNv" IAI"l I lIa PI.nN oR RU-OIt'l' W A As eRliYnli>:u YMR; SONLANMYATTA I' 9i1FERVI910N ANO TI IAT i AM A M. SUAVE UJF UN IpIIOPE IAS NO TIFEB.TORIINBFKNEt ITA. Or TI IRST'ATE OI' h91NNB9(]TA� DATE) 101$0,nn REGI 2013!1x103 REGISTIteSTION NVMIlIiR 8409.6 O12A1WN BY CHECKED BY LCC MRW DATE I'IIOJIXI,4 2013111126 2013-016.1 8111381 NUMI37R 2®F2 LNb,.I...iJL EZ, 33t I)a, + bENCl"i'ES AREA OF ■ PE�Aii:;(.i101d�l-"S'tN1iNC�.M•4'8F1i, • d1:.ELyi�I`a7A .lgh1 ■ p:1,t7LC9LanC13,L. `aTI�RFtWt1.'«,i•{, f�JVDt'aE. . • `AlETL,AsREfS � tsR.RihIA,EsIv �t(�i�,Ut SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS Note: Detailed Design and Specifications will occur at Preliminary Plat Application Phase 1. Preserve and Augment Existing Peripheral Buffers 2. Utilize Low Areas for Stormwater Management and Ecological Habitat 3. Homes Sited Outside Woodland and as Practicable Save Trees located in the existing Golf Course "rough" 4. Augment Visual Containment along County Road 19 5. Drainage Pattern Restoraflon by Field -Tile Removal 6. Complete County Road 19 Corridor Study 7. Wetlands "Off -Limits" &. Ecological Opportunities and Possibilities Identified on Exhibit 6 9. Primary Access from West Branch Road (County 151) 10. Design Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan (5 Culverts) with City and Watershed Con Servation Desi . A two -phased approach to design and development that maintains or improves ecological assets, provides infrastructure that wollcs with the land, and incorporates peoples' histinctive desire to experience nature. Some Conservation Design strategies include: identifying and avoiding sensitive, natural features, planning roads along contours, allowing lots to border natural open space, integrating ecological stormwater management, using smaller lots, and educating developer and buyers about the ecological values of the landscape. The fust phase entails an inventory and analysis of the potential development site's natural features, existing; Will uses, and wetland. delineation. The second phase entails analyzing the design implications of the fundings from the initial phase, alternative storrawater design, and a conceptual design for road and lot layouts. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 638&1;3-3§w 38 & 13-363 ENVIRONMENTAL PIZ€ T ECTI€) €K€.1AL5 1. Preserve flit quality of lake Minnetonka. 2. .Proserve the quality orall Other Likes In Orono. rcw�.,, x L P_k ;i, lerea rvctileCity'ssntirshland,vrefiandanddaturaldrainagesystem. ENGINEERING SURVEYING 4, Provide for surface water management such that the City is ENVIRONMENTAL protected from WIN fiaodingbazardsnnd pollution hazards. PLANNING R"S, INC. 5, Protect the City's ground water moure" froin pollution and front 10260 Valley Viaw Read, Suite 123 depletion. Eden Prairie, Minnesota 56344 Phone: 562-840-0238 G. Protect the City from air, water and noise nollutian. Pax: ss2-e 43-0290 vnvw,ayseng.acm 7. Pk'eserve Open Space, light and ail', Including solar acC@gg for all P.mylnvhm, S. leresel've a rVasonable amount or native woodlands is lin iutcgral port of o ono's heritage. s. Protect and preserve a reasonable amuent of natural wlldlifu habitat In woodlands mid wetlands, 14, Protect the land from still eroston and die hazards of dust anti allfatlon, IL Preserve greenways anti open space corridors, 12. Promote conservation and euhaticement of the quality of surface water Said wettan& throughout Orono, particularly Lake Minnetonka. 13. , [,asnre the prem vation and enhancement of the existing ';rural character" ofthecity. - 14. Preserve Orann'2 think night skies and ruloirnize light pollution. Goals and Guidirm Pirinciples C.W kl; 7'o p.Moreiht e -11W1 xiion aad enhane. nt or Iho quelity of wriaee warar aad Wgtlaad,s Ihroaghaot the ciq, partloslatty take MnAtoonkA. This goal reflects the fatenhaas or the tint goal in die city's nmosohonsiw plan Ltd rcatlimis Ilse drys long dlna coramftmartt to protea Lake hllwsowalka, its orator eiaality, and its renremloal l assets. .9M IN; To enure, the lsn''aarvodoaaad raihanoomarluFthanxlafina"Tura[ chgraetor" of the clty. This goal VIII onsure Iha d e msihak elements vnluvd by Crane rasldonts end � .Oa ..:_. t l naiandned and improved. entikiad in nig Sieve s m et't Via bn t,.__. ......._,.. -- j" iayL.linu �Mnet_ „•,de all Promote emlos€cntly sennittae star star uranryelnent. Applying sea erologfcailySiesad alorniwater maosgemaat ayalem M11 improve maxysloans by tndualug tKah olio" on mamaadc hrfraslrv.caoe and milddag downsueam imuir oreonumd,o tits, •fys�lyllo rid 1,Qe M4: FAlabarh aad moEetala wrtdva erntogical wtnmoniaea Couurcing and smProvulg ulna and semi-nalaral mens win pmvido wildlilh Siabilat and mliprnt natural ow1oyienl fwmlioae (T.o. drulnnge, Iiliuiny„ vaF ring, e(c), tldlpg ',1�LiG,lplg$fi ItWAhlish sad mldnhtai rwllogleal couaa'ntiote, Creating ccoh"god coapeotions will eubsncc VQM%ator wilcctini and conveyance, ptamoto etnlag€cai and wikaffa aoreidan. and provWo wneatloaal oppumrnidas far residents, ' ci k• Pmaarvn aad augment rutxidurear.Insure. Mairumning od improving the extent of roedwey corridor enciosomn will pmmolo commun€ly eoWmics aesooiated fvidl the CAD rural clMractee. �Y;�llyl 3] Pnscrvnvicws, Milipflug dw visual impacts of davcfopmcat 01. also presorvo the nesthoitc eionauts e£tho laadaoape, Cplding Prlacld uG: Firm— maid vAinrsies Iaadmarhe and rua€rfuo podia onocd character. Azaercing distinct cultural rnsmrua will rmiintaln nthuloju ,E,e ofplaca in rhe minmunity. .— ._.�__ _ ......___— 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET - Conservation Design Preamble - Environmental Protection Goals & Guiding Principles - Development Envelopes - Ecological Features DEVELOPMENT GOALS # DATE REVISION I HE11JMY CEItTIEY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAI' I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THR LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Devld Nosh DA'T'E W11112013 RE619TRAXION NUM13FR gl§H DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJG ! DMS DJN DATE PROJECT t! 92.76.2043 2013.018,1 SHEET NUMBER *Development Goals Numbered on Graphic 5 See. 78-1631x Purpose and intent. The City of Orono as a result of ilia Rural Oasis Study conducted in 2005 finds that there is an intrinsic Ilnk between the natural systems and the valued scenic character that exist throughout the community. The requirelrents of thle conservatlon deskgn Ordinance are meant to preserve and enhiilnce ihls ecolcgioallaesthellu character by requiring: (1) protection and enhancement of drelnageways and water quail€y; (2) protection and enhancement of ecological communities', (3) reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections throughout the oily; (4) augmentation and preservation of vlawshsda Including corridor enclosure and buffering; (5) prossrvation and improvement of views; and (8) preservation or relnterpre(aflcn of looal landmarks. tont IVO.'573rd AfIdes, § 1. 1.11$910) Ecological Management Categories: Level 1: Ecologiral 'off-llmfts" areas, including wetlands and required butrers, nlsiono drainage Level 2: Ecofaglcal oppartunllies, InclNding existing degraded drainageways and existing degraded ecosystem remnants, LBve19; Ecolopfcal possibilities; Areas suitable for stormwater treatment. Note: These Ecological Management Categories are riot Intended to directly correlate with MLCCS M•34X Natural Comnrun€ty 004lity Modifiers, Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 13-3638 & 13-363 1 9 MONARCH JOINT VENTURE Partnering aclrxss the U.S. !o conserve the morvirrh migratfou r rInrminr N,unr,,:atmlwnnntr — - _ ENGINEERING rulntnlu�l ,n ednw nnrt 11.mnnn.dmt u, lnthlbut v„nvw,elnn n„d rid,--��.a lanr+ -.�... SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL alwuhlemldlunn-1Irr c:dla,lr.nnn,lmm,r What You Can Do: PLANNING nlnlhnw,w inr,.e,,xr:rl,lnµln,r„, Ile(ppmtcamonarchsand EVS,INC. leehum I idomaev. arw '19269 Valley View Read, 9u1te 123 I,anr,YNr,llnh'nlnre+nrn,n,r theft” 1T31�ratSOii Fhtnl ndlhwnxdl attn, a,vt, mtcrnlllmnrlm.+l Eden Prairie,Minnesota 56344 • rmrc9dda rind hn nr2vjI1 ,, l,,. ,Lna3la+vu n PhnuEli„vvl,.ral,urvnna rlu,rluy, 'I^.,cxvnwr,vrr Phone: 952.64s.923s Monarchs ARisk? Fm 95244"211 nnmurelw n Int n,m val,vlurh:,al dsvrl pernrrrwiuhn. wHxw.eva.en9.cam DO. hill mftlL,m, uF n10„arvls hutWrll h.n pllylflln to uexnvlNlrr>np r'It=,S 311 MN �.'.', and IQ, Mnlvn11196WIM Iol W1119110-Ii"',lxlh 1n CatllrnmW. dna Gt tlwelrrynnunl xlll,!a and aAlarnnt to we,wl Vlm•InR 4m+rx, nnd,GwU• nP nvUnvlutl.'11nµ E¢,vw ae ling nx� . 11„hlint lass m nx�rutnWrhW rtlu,x in hSc..icrl, slue• n, I];ry'ul iYdyrinH Il auto pttiars need milkweed p[Rnts - . t 'ill hwnt wW'hxlx n M Ph"I lumwn'lNm, ANI h - v, AIW limn• vin0. lhn W'hu flash the Nwtnn'L, l.'e,npVV1A, hG IN4Vyneni,tthwnYSh.nlitJ. 1'Ixnl Lrtlkrlh'1¢v:lnr ldnnLvl Mcnun'h "mi Vrdule In I.IavItF, enwgy m Iltcw h,tvAl, Iw Ihmr urul,utP'Htritm, y, nnll in h1riSl nag's fi"tiu: Ilnu,"Iwo. Int,Ht ,4"tt"Ay Alanlr W my ft4,',I•`n, Pnd nen,t4 nnhm yr>IEcldud I:neintn'NI•}IS111An Intti n=IIHPIH:rn iV riiulU uuh 1.011ni.' IZeudnldoa mid pgrl,a n[ rv9 nrn,r F,�xrnm+nolaralu�n w t.,.-1dN hHhll.:t h,r vnnnmehs and Yll;4rh,d!tmm�ra .Intel elnrvmsrtnnrn Id Vamn m track mnnnreh 11110 h,mvi Thu 16-116'VII"ted 6.ylnmthntU "I 11tV11 fClt'n 1-nrn,x11 trio unxtl Ily mums Wt aeleati�u to d"j'I rnkmnwh IwllWsiµn, unndn. Ansi In Wrn MW chub wli¢I mlllhi. kn•6cn 1114 diol' numuwn imnt 1'Imr l li t',llr Cover Classification - Level 3 "- 1000D Artificial Surfaces [� .20000 Planted ctr Cultivated ® 30000 Forests Cover Classification - Level 9 CO 10000 ArtitiW Surfaces 20DOO Planted or Oull:iva'W 30000 Forests CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET -Ecological Possibilities & Opportunities - Orono Natural Resources Inventory and MLCCS - Basic Conservation Design Master Plan (Ordinance 67) 11 DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THTS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARRI) BY ME OR UNDER KY AIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A,14A DULY I-TCENSED PROFESSIONAL T?NGIN13ECi UNDER THE LAWS OP TIT STATE OF MINNESOTA. neyrd Nash DATE 1271612013 REGISTIIATIONNUMDER 21838 DRAWNBY CHECKED BY MJG I DMS DJN DATE PROJECT it 12.18.2013 2013-018,1 SHEET NUMHldt Environmental Protection Plan The Metropolitan Council's Storm Water Impact Investigation (1973) The objectives of storm drainage design should be revised ,from rapid disposul to concepts which will decrease the impact of storm water by reducing peak flows and "improving quality. The design criteria should include concepts such as on-site disposal, retention ponds, retention of recharge areas and marshes, gross waterways, and other new methods of management of storm mater which may decrease eapitul requirement for new development. (Orono CMP, p.3A-29 ) Conservation Design Check List Klmew ane P—a nn Ven F"Rnsa to the G els and Polrh+p for EnAtonmen{ PmWdlon and Novnd Rasaun,, Mdndgemellt as MtaIf119hCd In Ehe Grub I tiamnw4ty Nana9etmnt Plan and the roc Nl Modatimis nortd1JEKwlUlEn the Ore. Narural Rcsoun;ea Innm[ary. The Intent Is W establish the pmp W4 t r:tvleglcal rermtmq troth MLhln rlrsno real as part of da: regional am°aEyloal a } MJGIDMS DJN DATEPROJECT # 12.18.2013 i h 1 SHEET NUMBER 7 Etem TArliSeryaapn DeslUn Mdstor Pie{t 3. Rnr0.1 A¢4195ielfly �. .._.•---...,.---�-__...__._ ...,.,,,._..___ 4. a. Consideration of the "5tlmd drainage system if lite INCq;rty rales adjacmlt la a docflmonled Wrrlripl' In Ute Rural [1ds�5 Study, -_......._.�_ ...._..-.. _...._�_T,....."- retaaw and Iespond to the rad5tin9 aeslhelE and acnlogicpl analysis h. shrcmwairr Managemmlt pian _ estv�usrnrrer;tWusmrrewnxrmrwr�e.•ne rtaysnmy u.Nrq muluw iF the propercgls no[ndlatantisa dod{menied corddur in the Rural Oasisasls 9hldy, bewimm�tpNrcYpec drurdeRitixj propanrinr N&Orstarmwahv r1¢velaper shall haven quallf d MmuRant prepare a slmpar anew, and sutRnit R !K Rat n5: «vyucriop iothe CMO—WOW. This auuNNIasha0 helude the dommerllaton of -;-- f;_ b mrr[tloren(Jmm,LG*G-TERM PRESERVATEQN ..._.-._ art,. ...__......- .._......__ � and randmarks through a plan analys[s and pMStom ln9mpiw, ' l IG Sac. 70-jR, pxaserwtfon mnulremants. rlswk+rMYSPw & f r,,7vMd5FaIKk]rrfh eshrWlsfr:dhl dlethyPee soY fee TW dE4 beer shall etaWh and lmnler ttmea5ure4 lhatwil@nWuo the Toiler Nn: expenses uM c4yMfririn9cl m+su't rstto mWa+v me ecuft:gW1,lm preurvatim and mamlenrca of U— elements ar the develapmert shat am ama7ysrs suaannax(by me i7 •Piper. dWr nin 1 W require long-lvml or penmEnent protection hem devNoplx.n[ or such measures may md7 f[n but are not Ilmltrd to: wasprvatiun deed reslrkgans; p{avate ravananls; transtcrof own,+ship to agencies 9 Neural Resourt'o Invenbm, srrh as the Minnesota Land Trost ar [Iry NO— Comnrvancy, or to the city na Indude all of the Naming alarm, s; dedlcatwn etc ......_�..�__T_.._ __ a. Renew and dceament ora Ml.(%5 data pertnent to hlesl>e, —' ""'--------......... -- b. Tme suNy y lMnl Se.G 78•I63s. auyeredneallan. rM7rA'k• d113'rwrkRnt hmO drrrlr trios weetdr'4-slN fr.tdlalrtcYe/. s,d .....__. _...---____..._ _..____—... _ ...._.._ sru afA'EaS 1't!ML4, tree$Fadesaruisfl! 'rhe deyelajY2f shall rstaMish wmnaat5da me,Un9 Ute elements er the C. YYetaM Invantary and Wetland Auffer g dewdnpmetu to he: protected god grow dteyam {o be pmlectzdr and shall estakJlsh aA[Trm praar en raredamtba d lite inhial Ptnchasers -OLS wlhdn Hie. —_... _ d, t'ol»wgraphk'.urvev.. dwefopmantas to tie pmitaUons Ihn[affect fVNre us¢ of Lite WWxxiy. A10p 3A-5 is n Conceptual Grhxnwoy Corridor Ali gamcni developed by MIX.' taking into account a number of guiding elements, iuehiding: .High and Moderate gwlity natural areas Cather urtique Land/or ecologieaa2lysignificant areas Riparian areas including bodies of Water and wetland complexes Natural corridors with naturallsfslni-natural areas (streams, draiaageways, tloodplainx, steep Slopes) -C'onnacti,vity to surrounding communities identified natural corridors Largo publicly and privately owned protected open spices Henri-ala€ural areas that occur immediately adjacent to natural areas Areas tka would serve as logical lillkS bCiW0e11 natural areas, ParlieHIRdy those that ilavc potential for restoration to nuturul vegetation. Mf>aaf.,E ITT The Ar -.10. mignlUl was lixlnl by rhr hlmnmaanai iluEunfor Colne •iHVM of Nauu'e as na undangarcd phpnumeurnl kn i91Q, In 20iU, Iha World Wlldllf¢ fund Inchuled awnarelea pn Its lilt of rhe"1iq+10 to Walalt In MW': ,ipomea Ihat are 11 glll to leo ul Head or d,w mon{roriny mid fmcWon. F' r • 19m co1sscrvallun .rlalna of munu'Lll ewmvivuerhlg ulrrn hl .' Nesielr reMwi 1 -ch rtllentlao. llowaVer, monal'ch4 fllco '.fir ,� t` • .'Iudlvnpe In the U.S. Ea wetl, A dMi-In tllr nurnher of wasrcnr monunheanosl of w1110 apcnd their e,mira Ilta qde kn qn, U.S., leas l e n well doerrnlmded ova lhut,10 Vanda, hath eauarnaladw wrn monarchsan drPM4111 nn hahRatslnalilr a+ �• Ihl'nlythoul tiw U.S., which Is being thee.alencd hyl lima rAt cenvardnA and rhunycs In Land manugenta it pnrauaasihar—rcduring the availability ofnshkwv l: Puankble chmtgea In mi€kw O avallabURy, quality, mkd dIg,,butlana lu, to effw, ol'dim wchange: y'+ 5I 'l Pesticide use to contrpl olbpr losectn, wilt un€oregnhrd 5 bTS '14, 1 , MI r% kL It _ € . hnrrllfJf F'UIlIC+j EllaE6 laf mannrCh5; d Iii '3-a 5,x MIN. („"lryap (.t '1 Bahllut convurxion In Caklioru3n,—Lilting {n reduuni -0- A 15;P'. K OILY$ urallability nad auxhFy utaverralarcring sues; and t %LEF4TiVL�]�6 bE.T5VZ. � SUCi`U5=W-GG_''A F_ SEG.76-160 U 3STC�t SIAL MEA OF 51TE Ii ulq�Mvt;l' VA W1 PRMEVA710% RECOnEb VM M�k L,57' • IM�` rayy ��qq,1rr,�.�l�� �(-�rgir��t-o�l�! l i>a1FAt."�t E rOkll N CrZ05�,w 1 SITE CONSERVATION SUMMARY GROSS SITE AREA 135.92 AC LESS WETLANDS 14.39 AC LESS PRIVATE STREET 7.00 AC NET SITE AREA 114.53 AC PROPOSED LOTS 55 UNITS AVERAGE LOT SIZE 2.08 ACILOT e, Site Analysis ""—"" - A N.! Re adrhdr s rd `new m' R"r,°rr� WORK IM 'PRO&RESS CONSERVATION AREA 65.57 AC = 48% Y Maras ro: (INCLUDES PORTIONS OF LOTS NOT COMMITTED TO PAD, SEPTIC, FRONT YARDS) Conceptual Greenway Corridor =sleep slope Soils FAsurtg WetlmiOs [�;E] C4weptual Greenway Co Mdor Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-363 AIW Remaining Developable Parcels [,;;,„,„j ParkallZai:re8liortailppert5paoa Nietland gM Rea antiat Parreis that are Not Subd1v1dM11a N 0 200 400 SCALE�� Existing Land Use .= SF Med Density Res 0.0-0.5 per We Rural Res 2Acre Min in Parkfopen Space _� Wetlands ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC. 10260 Valley VI_ Road, sults 123 Eden Pralrte, Minnesota 66044 phone: g52�840-0138 Fax', S02•S40A290 www.evs-eng.com CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET -Detailed Conservation Master Plan Concept with CMP Part 3-A References -Conservation Design Checklist # DATE. REVISION I H1;R$RY CaRTTPY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT 1E+AS PRI?PARED BY ME OR UNDISR MY DIRECT SUPE11VISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. My€d Nash DATE 12118f 1013 REGISTRATIONNUMBER NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY C14ECKVD BY MJGIDMS DJN DATEPROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013018,1 SHEET NUMBER 7 MKINAY INF 'ILK INV. =964,^2 INV .45 ,. • r YTM �itrZANI(, SLOPE: . :.. . ~L 945 [E,s VAil�lta clutilar� • • • �- ' ,, ,� ` ` •� � � 16% aou I J r • �i 4L.41 G26l !iL °e5 + •• • • ` � 7 'a te, e • 7: . 1 Q- // i'0 I . s3Y 5Y Rr- o 65% . • �1 • • • • �. \ i1iJlET,95ffi' 41 SADRELAND "N rNEKLAY �•� .� • *• \ ,•� • a".., l 1. Y. A., Nk, 4. I F. 7 f�'►.b jo• B 2Da 400 SG I� T II I i I I /FLOW \ 12P PIPE INV. -835.13 929,66 8 �•+ s I CHECKED BY MJGIDIMS DJN } PROJECT # 12.18.2013 * • Y 3 1?-" PIPE: INV, =951.14 i �,�1�" i. l." s...".. I I / Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 Total Pa es 99 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING �Y NORT CRESTkK A \C Wetlands & Drainage Districts Manage 2 (26' Buffer) Crena Land Cover Classification M No Land Cover Classification data 10000 Artificial Sorisces and 20000 Planted or Cultivated 60000 Herbacous Vegetetion I Floodplain 100 -Year FEMA 500 -Year FIRMA EVS, INC. 10290 Valley VI.. Road, SuIte 323 Eden Weld., Wn—In 65344 Phone: 952-646-6236 6.,;952.646.0290 mvw--o"g.com CLIENT Source hand Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus sHEEr Slopes, Wetlands & Drainage, Tree Massings, Land Cover, FEMA Map # DATI, REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT]' WAS PREPARED BY ME. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE 1211812013 REGIBTRATIoNNUMBER 21835 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDIMS DJN } PROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013-018.1 Y 3 �,�1�" i. l." s...".. I I / Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 Total Pa es 99 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING �Y NORT CRESTkK A \C Wetlands & Drainage Districts Manage 2 (26' Buffer) Crena Land Cover Classification M No Land Cover Classification data 10000 Artificial Sorisces and 20000 Planted or Cultivated 60000 Herbacous Vegetetion I Floodplain 100 -Year FEMA 500 -Year FIRMA EVS, INC. 10290 Valley VI.. Road, SuIte 323 Eden Weld., Wn—In 65344 Phone: 952-646-6236 6.,;952.646.0290 mvw--o"g.com CLIENT Source hand Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus sHEEr Slopes, Wetlands & Drainage, Tree Massings, Land Cover, FEMA Map # DATI, REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT]' WAS PREPARED BY ME. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE 1211812013 REGIBTRATIoNNUMBER 21835 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDIMS DJN DATE PROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013-018.1 SKEET NUMBER 3 u Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 Total Pa es 99 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS, INC, 16269 V -II -y Vlaw Road, Sulto 123 Eden PMIrle, Mlnnascla 55346 Phone: 962.646.023E Fax: 982.646.6226 www.evaeng.com I CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus i SHEET - Geotechnical Boring Locations Suitable Septic Solis - Site Specific Percolation Testing in Progress LEGEND SOIL BORING LacATIONS . {FV I�1 (BRAl1N INTERTEC) "^ SUITABLE SOIL FOR SEPTIC DRAINAGE a 2oa 400 SCALE IN FEET # DATE REVI5fOIY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPE CIEIGATIDN,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME Olt UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DULY LICENSED PRORESSIONAL ENGINEER UDDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESDTA. David Nash DATE 12j 111 2613 REGISTRATION NUMBER 21636 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT# 12.18.2013 2013-098.1 SHEET NUMBER 4 I Proposed Water Distribution System W_ i{: NNW, �i., A e 1. oft S I ' f / _ PROPOSES HTY ANT µ IocnnDlvs 4n�I � I l i l I r l !L"c( 1(1 TRUNK WATERMAIN )M MINNETRISTA PROPOSED WATERMAIN I11 ( t6g1111 CSAR 151 11144 k . — 66. E i, CSF" SITE , L,i�TAl- �T, c t x,.,.55 �fo�.zr..€� r` Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 1in/ ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING I INC. 10260V II VI 110 d e It 123 APPROXIMATE WATER USE Aden PmIrte a.Minnesota 59344 Phone; 952-949-0236 Fex: 852-949-0291 Current Conditions _"s-eng.— Lakeview Golf Course Water Usage 20 million gal/yr (source; 207,2 MN ONR Annua l Report of Water lJsel CLIENT Proposed 55 Proposed Homes on Individual Wells (300 gal/day/house) Irrigation usage (9000 gal/week/home -typical use for 1 acre of turf} Total Proposed Usage Total Water Usage Reduction 6million gal/yr ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Proposed Water Distribution System NOTES 1. WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED BY CITY OF MINNETRISTA 2. APPROXIMATE HYDRANT SPACING: 300-500' LEGEND iF1 PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED WATERMAIN OFFSITE WATERMAIN N 0 209 400 �;I SCALL IN FEET it DATE REVISION I IDZIIRi3Y CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR RL'PORT WAS PREPARED RY ME OR UNDER KY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER XJND1iIt THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. b -Id Neat DATE 1211812013 REGISTRATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT 12.18.2013 2093-018.1 SHEET NUMBER C1 Source Land Capital 6 milliongal/yr PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course 8 million gal/yr LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND 14 million gal/yr SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair Total Water Usage Reduction 6million gal/yr ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Proposed Water Distribution System NOTES 1. WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED BY CITY OF MINNETRISTA 2. APPROXIMATE HYDRANT SPACING: 300-500' LEGEND iF1 PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED WATERMAIN OFFSITE WATERMAIN N 0 209 400 �;I SCALL IN FEET it DATE REVISION I IDZIIRi3Y CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR RL'PORT WAS PREPARED RY ME OR UNDER KY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER XJND1iIt THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. b -Id Neat DATE 1211812013 REGISTRATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT 12.18.2013 2093-018.1 SHEET NUMBER C1 Concept Stormwater Management Plan EENARN..Rh2 CASTING CR APPROVCO EOL'AL. UNLESS 'EWSE NOTED. L-----� _ a.. j ". . � \— — � --- � e �, °•-„ — � ems' ' \ G DL µ ACCESS FOR hWNTENANCE 1 NLET ANC CUTIEi PIPES =_ } SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BOTH SIDES OF 7HF NBE, 5ij910 PONCL0.T � Sof WEIR ELyRn UPON CN�sVARDEPENDING /N, DESIGN PARAMETERS. RERECED I lA 'VS( }1� �.gBpJ t)T /o� - --ti_ �°.���� ` �\ �ONINFORCRETE PIPE NO B Cl O 839 p S + } \ T Flow UJ P u P Q fp / 9\ / / WEIR TO eE pEwNRCEC AUH n ° �\ PIPE LENGTH AND SIZE WILL LE61 04 FEERAR. I2' ON CENTE .In.x ,�`'. 960 ~tl CI « 4 VARY. REINFORCED CONCREFE OR rl ,_.[, DUMLE IRON PIPES CAN RE STEPS ! II �z - ° 9 ` USED FCR THE INLETS DONT - R W •R aaTO� ^ }.°\y �'M TF f / IF PIPES ARE JI APRONS uR TRASH GUARWATER D. I U .✓ YJ N '�/ 9H0 yW �' G ® \1 A. I « _ •� p� \ \ �/ / FLUW ''in USE MINFORCE FOR f P d/ °.� '� O Ey0 • a /� Yi OUTLETS, r,� /'1 Qp9tl –i/rY /WIN W«\ \ 000HOUSn SHALL BE ORD ON– I r P r is '�� I/•G':M y 1 +6IS / °siRuHruINSIDE AND oursmE OF THE TYPICAL OCS SKIMMER STRUCTURE C2 NOT TOscAI� .40 \� I�♦ /.a� 1 1 xN� I�.a Vk glop m/ ° 00 0 I\ a aP P«p + « of y I Ierg .119 a � 0-0 Cr� — I L CICS I�i� s o % TpEaTAREAT:P.«/ e I I / � \\. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS A. PHOSPHORUS CONTROL -SITE SHALL TREAT STORM RUNOFF SO NO NET INCREASE IN PHOSPHOROUS LOADING SHALL LEAVE SITE. B. WATER QUALITY - SITE SHALL TREAT FIRST 1" OF RUNOFF FROM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES C, RATE CONTROL - PEAK RUNOFF RATES FROM THE 1-, 10- AND 100 -YEAR STORM MAY NOT INCREASE FROM EXISTING RATES POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS (IN COOPERATION WITH THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT) A. PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESTORE/ENHANCE EXISTING WETLANDS B. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RUNOFF TREATMENT THROUGH PONDING AND/OR INFILTRATION C. MITIGATE EXISTING DRAINAGE CONCERNS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES - REDIRECT RUNOFF D. REDUCE TURF GRASS AREA THROUGH CREATION OF DEDICATED CONSERVATION AREAS ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS LEGEND 005® PROPOSED OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURES (x2) PROPOSED TREATMENT AREAS (x5) SUB -WATERSHED BOUNDARIES ----I".`+ DRAINAGE DIRECTION N 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-363LLL64aloLaes 99 Al2W ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVSINC. 9266 V911ay Vie 1w Raad, 8.11; 123 Eden Prairie MI—.19 56344 Phone: 952.645-0230 Fax: 952.646.0290 wwwsvR-eng,eom CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Concept Stormwater Management Plan it DATE REVISION 113EREBYCERTIFY HATTHIS PLAN, sPEcrFIcATroN, OR REPORT WASPREPARED 13YME OR UNDER MY DIRPCT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ANI A DULYLICENSAI] PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE. STATIi OP MINNESOTA. D -Id Nash DATE 12113i 2013 REGISTRATION NUMBER 21636 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGlDMS DJN DA'M PROJECT# 12A8.2093 2013-098.1 ST-TEET NUMBPE, C2 Concept Septic Design I I I I I I I L_. -7I 0 By1i.. I T 'A10� } IF °o 10,000 SF SEPTIC FIELD 80 FTA 60 FT HOUSE PAD FIfrLD DELINEATED WETLAND / PROPOSED CENTERLINE, P� V/ATE STREET 1 \ \\ SOIL SUITABILITY Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-36J2.LL2taLegg�W 997 --0" ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 1 TYPICAL SEPTIC - MOUND SYSTEM C3 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND xX 9 SEPTIC TEST LOCATIONS (PASSED) a 200 400 SCALE IN FEET Eva, INC. 10256 Valley Vlaw Road, Sulte 123 Eden Prairla, Mlnneaota 55344 Phone: 952.546.6236 FM 952 646.0290 www.evs•ang.com CLIENT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LAND PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN Michael J. Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Concept Septic Design # DATE REVISION I I-IEREBY CERTIFY THAI THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPAR HD BY hIE OR UNDER NLY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAhI A DULYLTCENSED PROPESSIONAL ENGINEER UND'RR THE LAWS OF THE STATE. OP MINNESOTA. David Nash DA9Tt 12/1672013 REGISTRATIONNUMBER 21936 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT 12.78.2013 2013-018.1 SKEET NUMBER C3 2 -WAY CONTROLLED INTERSECTION CSAH 19 ACCESS UNDESIRABLE BY COUNTY FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: • TRAFFIC VOLUMES - 5,600 VEHIDAY(2012) • POSTED SPEED - 50 MPH • ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION - MINOR ARTERIA 4 -WAY CONTROLLED INTERSECTION N o zoo aaa SCALE IN FEET a Transportation Plan EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS/—EXISTING GOLF COURSE TRAFFIC 260 ROUND TRIPS/DAY DURING GOLF SEASON (ESTIMATED BASED ON # OF GOLF ROUNDS PLAYE=D IN 2013) I iy.5.a�{aymx�a-meR.�z'-#n!:�=f,rwP,-Ww:ew>b,rT.m:+cu.a •�. :�IXr- Q� i4 - f t Hyl, r V " r °s qq t jj f: p; herr...,^>g i.' I \ M Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & I3-363 �l ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 1 ;1 _ CSAH 151 -COLLECTOR I / / � I T I FORECASTED TRAFFIC FLOW 155 LOTS x 5 ROUND TRIPS/LOT/DAY = 275 TRIPS/DAY CSAH 151 ACCESS SUPORTED BY COUNTY FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: • TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 1,100 VEH/DAY (2012) • POSTED SPEED: 45 MPH • ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION: COLLECTOR • ACCESS LOCATION APPEARS TO MEET COUNTY SPACING STANDARDS FOR COLLECTOR ROADWAY EVS, INC. 10286 Valley Vle Road, Sulte 123 Eden Prairie, Mlnnesota 59344 Phone: 952.548.0235 Fax: 052.545-D90 www.evaang.com CI,MNT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LANA PLANNING AND SITE DISIGN Michael J, Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Transportation Plan # DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIPYTHAT THIS PLAN, SPDCIFIC.ATION, OR 1113PORT WAS PREPARED EY ME UR MINDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THATI AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, UMd Nash DATE 121 161 201 3 RECISTRATIONNUMBER 21838 DRAWNBY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013.018,4 SHEET NUMBER C4 I<I I I ] I a R LU I Ic�Ip:' .t ff Oh a' r R herr...,^>g i.' I \ M Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & I3-363 �l ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 1 ;1 _ CSAH 151 -COLLECTOR I / / � I T I FORECASTED TRAFFIC FLOW 155 LOTS x 5 ROUND TRIPS/LOT/DAY = 275 TRIPS/DAY CSAH 151 ACCESS SUPORTED BY COUNTY FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: • TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 1,100 VEH/DAY (2012) • POSTED SPEED: 45 MPH • ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION: COLLECTOR • ACCESS LOCATION APPEARS TO MEET COUNTY SPACING STANDARDS FOR COLLECTOR ROADWAY EVS, INC. 10286 Valley Vle Road, Sulte 123 Eden Prairie, Mlnnesota 59344 Phone: 952.548.0235 Fax: 052.545-D90 www.evaang.com CI,MNT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LANA PLANNING AND SITE DISIGN Michael J, Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Transportation Plan # DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIPYTHAT THIS PLAN, SPDCIFIC.ATION, OR 1113PORT WAS PREPARED EY ME UR MINDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THATI AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, UMd Nash DATE 121 161 201 3 RECISTRATIONNUMBER 21838 DRAWNBY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013.018,4 SHEET NUMBER C4 I<I I I ] I a R herr...,^>g i.' I \ M Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & I3-363 �l ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 1 ;1 _ CSAH 151 -COLLECTOR I / / � I T I FORECASTED TRAFFIC FLOW 155 LOTS x 5 ROUND TRIPS/LOT/DAY = 275 TRIPS/DAY CSAH 151 ACCESS SUPORTED BY COUNTY FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: • TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 1,100 VEH/DAY (2012) • POSTED SPEED: 45 MPH • ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION: COLLECTOR • ACCESS LOCATION APPEARS TO MEET COUNTY SPACING STANDARDS FOR COLLECTOR ROADWAY EVS, INC. 10286 Valley Vle Road, Sulte 123 Eden Prairie, Mlnnesota 59344 Phone: 952.548.0235 Fax: 052.545-D90 www.evaang.com CI,MNT Source Land Capital PROJECT Lakeview Golf Course LOCATION Orono, MN LANA PLANNING AND SITE DISIGN Michael J, Gair ASLA, Emeritus SHEET Transportation Plan # DATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIPYTHAT THIS PLAN, SPDCIFIC.ATION, OR 1113PORT WAS PREPARED EY ME UR MINDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THATI AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, UMd Nash DATE 121 161 201 3 RECISTRATIONNUMBER 21838 DRAWNBY CHECKED BY MJGIDMS DJN DATE PROJECT # 12.18.2013 2013.018,4 SHEET NUMBER C4 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 M File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages J Mike Gaffron �NL� (M From: Pat Hiller [path@sourceland.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:24 PM To: Mike Gaff ron; Stephen Grittman Subject: Lakeview Item #6 Attachments: Carla Stueve P E PTOE.vcf Mike/Steve, Here is the preliminary traffic impact assessment for both Lakeview and Red Oak Golf Courses from the Hennepin County traffic engineers. Pat From: Chase Peterson [mailto:ChaseP@sourceland.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:16 PM To: path@sourceland.com Subject: FW: Red Oak/Lakeview Projects Chase Peterson Source Land Capital chasep@sourceland.com Office: (763)-551-0100 Cell: (712)-490-3423 From: Carla J Stueve [mailto:Carla.Stueve henne in.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:09 PM To: Chase Peterson Cc: Robert H. Byers; Steven J Groen; Jonathan J Krieg; 'dabeMcl.minnetrista.mmus'; mgaffron@ci.orono.mn.us Hi Chase, Thank you for coming out to meet with us on November 12, 2013. Based on the pians you presented, following is a summary of our initial thoughts on the proposed redevelopment plans for the Lakeview and Red Oak Golf Courses. This summary of the meeting should not be misinterpreted as our official formal comments on the plans. When the concept plans develop into preliminary plats, we will provide formal responses to the cities of Orono and Minnetrista at that time. However, based on your request, following are a few initial comments/county recommendations that came out of our meeting and initial review: Lakeview Golf Course Proposed Access on CSAH 151 • Proposed access on CSAH 151, directly across from Forest Arms Lane • The existing access location appears to meet the county spacing guidelines, 1/8 mile (660 feet) for a collector roadway The County would support „access on CSAH 151, based on: o Trafflc volumes - 1,100 vehicles per day (2012 counts) o Posted speed - 45 mph o Roadway classification - minor collector Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 Access onto CSAH 19 would be undesirable from a county perspectirl��le j1 88&SA:13-3639[TotalPages99] o Traffic volumes - 5,600 vehicles per day (2012 counts) o Posted speed - 50 mph o Roadway classification - minor arterial • Emergency access — possibly on North Arm Drive • Clear sight distance? Desirable distances for a 45 mph roadway, based on county guidelines, are as follows: 635 feet to the left and 570 feet to the right. • The Hennepin County Permits Office offered to assist in the completion of sight distance field measurements at the proposed access to determine if there is sufficient sight distance for drivers entering onto CSAH 151 Future ROW needs: • Current roadway design on both CSAH 19 and CSAH 151 - 2 -lane rural roadway wl minimal shoulder • Additional right-of-way or highway/trail easement dedication requested to provide sufficient space for future roadway needs and bicycle/pedestrian accommodations • The space needed would depend on the future pedestrian and.bicycle accommodations (i.e. using the roadway shoulder or a separated multi -use path). • On Hennepin County bike plan? o CSAH 19: yes - bikeway on/off roadway o CSAH 151: identified as a secondary system • Existing Right -of -Way o CSAH 19: 33 feet from centerline to property line o CSAH 151: 40 feet from centerline to property line • County's typical design section for a,2 -lane rural roadway: 50 - 60 feet of right-of-way (CL to property line). • The county will reguest additional right-of-way: o 27 feet from the roadway CIL on CR 19 o 10 feet from the roadway Cls on CR 151 Red Oak Golf Course Proposed Access on CSAH 19 CSAH 19 is a 2 -lane rural, minor arterial roadway with gravel shoulders and minimal clear zone • Daily traffic volumes - 2,075 vehicles per day (2012 counts) • Proposing to shift current access on CSAH 19 — approximately 150 feet to the south • The existing golf course access, Red Oak Lane, will be vacated, with connections provided to serve the existing homes to the north and west. • Potential emergency access to Grandview Avenue • Majority of traffic expected to travel tolfrom the north to access Highway 12 • The addition of a southbound right -turn lane would be beneficial for traffic_ safety -purposes, due to high traffic speeds (50 mph posted) -and minimal clear zone • Clear sight distance? • The Hennepin County Permits Office offered to assist in the completion of sight distance field Measurements at the proposed access to determine if there is sufficient sight distance for drivers entering onto CSAH 19 Future right-of-way needs: • Additional right-of-way or highway/trail easement dedication requested to provide sufficient space for future turn lanes on CSAH 19 and future bicycle/pedestrian accommodations • Existing right-of-way = 33 feet from centerline to property line • County's typical design section for a 2 -lane rural roadway: 50 - 60 feet of right-of-way (CL to property line). • Hennepin County would like an additional 27 feet of half right-of-way_on CSAH _1.9_(since it is on the County Bike Plan) Site pian is currently showing 27 feet of right-of-way dedication Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further from the county at this point. Please forward the preliminary plat to me when that is submitted to the city. Thanks! Carla Carla Sheave, P.E., PTOE Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Planning 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, M.N 553140 P12) 596.0356 Work From: Chase Peterson [ma ilto:ChasePC&sourceland.comj Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 11:25 AM To: Carla J Stueve Subject: Iced Oak/Lakeview Projects Morning Carla, Thank you again for meeting with us last week to discuss both the Lakeview and Red Oak golf courses. I wanted to follow up with you on our city council meeting we had last week. As expected, we had a full crowd and listened to a lot of questions/concerns from the neighbors. The council listened to all comments and concerns and in the end, granted us a 60 day delay to provide them with more information. They feel as if there are too many unknowns in regard to the septic system layout, lot count and configuration, environmental issues, and even traffic. Is there any way you could draft a letter referring to our meeting? In specific we would like to show the council and public that we have met with you, and shared our visions for both courses. I would also like them to know how you and staff feel about the impacts and preferred traffic routes. Any information would be helpful for us at this time. Please let me know if this is possible, as it would be very beneficial for our review process with the city. Thanks, Chase Peterson Source Land Capital chasepesourcela nd.com Office: (763)-551-0100 Cell (71.2)-490-3423 Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: Lakeview Golf Course local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek WD Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): T117, R23W, Sec 6 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Source Land Capital, Chase Peterson Address: 18215 45th Ave N, Suite D City, State, Zip: Plymouth MN 55446 E-mail: chasep@sourceland.com Phone: Phone: (763)-551-0100 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): Kjolhaug Environmental Contact Person: Melissa Barrett Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane City, State, Zip: Shorewood, MN 55331 E-mail: melissa@kjolhaugenv.com Phone: 952-401-8757 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: X Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) X Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature; By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner pursue this determination. C Applicant oi� Authorize -Agent Signa ure Date Important Notes: The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the reportlinformation to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 a US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 0110611_4 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pa es 9#rint Form Request for Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Review Please enter the following general information about the property under review: Name of property owner Chase Peterson, Source Land Capital 18215 45th Ave N, Suite p Plymouth MN 50446 Property Address (No. & Street, City, State, Zip Code) See report text for Lakeview Golf Course, Orono Lat. a Long.(decimal degrees) County Hennepin Location: Il4 Section 6 Township 117 Range23 Size of review area -142 acre(s) By submission of this wetland delineation report I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District provide me with the following (check only one box): ❑✓ Wetland Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with awetland delineation is a written notification from the Corps concurring, not concurring, or conunenting on the wetland boundaries delineated on a property. Under this request, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the wetlands on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area. ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination is a non- binding written indication that there may be waters of the United States, including wetlands, on a parcel or indications of the approximate location(s) of waters of the United States or wetlands on a parcel. Preliminary jurisdictional determinations are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. d❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination, An approved jurisdictional determination is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States or navigable waters of the United States, or both, are either present or absent on the property. An approved jurisdictional determination precisely identifies the limits of those waters on the project site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved jurisdictional determinations can be relied upon by the affected party for a period of five years. An approved jurisdictional detennination may be appealed through the Corps' administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations.in Minnesota and Wisconsin (http://www.invp.usace.aimy.mil/regulatot-y/). Requestor `lam, xvv _,_ _ Date 12/18/2013 Name (typed) Melissa Barrett SOURCE LAND CAPITAL January 2, 2014 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Pkwy Orono, IVIN 55356 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/ 14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 0 V. At the last City Council meeting on November 12th where the Lakeview Golf Course residential redevelopment was discussed and at the two neighborhood meetings we have held thus far it is has been made clear to us that Council members and residents want to understand the possible environmental implications arising from redevelopment of the golf course. We've done our best to answer those questions to this point, but have elected voluntarily to take an additional step to assure the City that our project will adhere to the highest environmental standards, including those of the City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and will not have a negative impact to the City, area residents or to the environment in general. In fact, in many ways our proposed development will incorporate environmental safeguards that will be an improvement over the current condition of the golf course. We are enclosing a draft of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet ("EAW") that includes all of the relevant questions and answers relating to our project. An EAW is not required and has not been requested; we've chosen to fill out the document to assure the City that all relevant questions are asked and answered. Based on the technical analysis of the project and its likely impacts, we believe the conservation residential development plan we are proposing will protect the environment and will, in fact, improve certain elements of the conditions currently present on the site. We have elected to provide this draft to you since it represents the most authoritative format in which to review the project. Once you have reviewed it, we believe you will agree that it demonstrates that all relevant environmental questions have been satisfactorily answered and supports a conclusion that the project will not pose a risk to the environment. We look forward to reviewing the data incorporated into the draft EAW with you to ensure we have not overlooked anything and that all of your questions are answered. We will call to arrange a meeting for that purpose. Best regard , Patrick Hiller Source Land Capital 18215 45TH AVE NORTH, SUITE D, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 * R 763.551.0100 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] July 2013 version ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: http://www.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Lakeview Golf Course Low Density Residential Redevelopment 2. Proposer: Source Land Capital, LLC 3. RGU: City of Orono Contact person: Patrick Hiller Contact person: Mike Gaffron Title: Principal Title: Asst. City Admin/LT Strategy Address: 18215 45th Ave N, Suite D Address: 2750 Kelley Pkwy City, State, ZIP: Plymouth, MN 55446 City, State, ZIP: Orono, MN 55323 Phone: 763-551-0100 Phone: 952-249-4600 Fax: 763-551-4999 Fax: 952249-4616 Email: path@sourceland.com Email: mgaffron@ci.orono.mn.us 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: ❑ EIS Scoping ❑ Citizen petition ❑ Mandatory EAW ❑ RGU discretion X Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): 5. Project Location: County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono PLS Location ('/4, %a, Section, Township, Range): Portions of the SW'/4 of Sec. 06, T. 117., R. 23, portion (148.2 acres) of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of See. 06, T. 117., R. 23, and 1.5 acres of the NW1/4 of the NE 1/ of Sec. 07, T. 117., R. 23. Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Minnehaha Creek Watershed District GPS Coordinates: 44.96810°, -93.63980° (Lat, Long) Tax Parcel Numbers: 06-117-23-32-0003, 06-117-23-33-0005, 06-117-23-33-0007 and 06-117-23-34-0002 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project See Figua°e .XXXX; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable) See Figure XXXX; and • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre -construction site plan and post - construction site plan. See Figure XXXX for the plan showing the current concept site pian. See Figure XXXX for the existing site plan. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The approximately 150 acre Lakeview Golf Course in Orono, MN is proposed to be redeveloped into 55 single family homes. Natural features will be retained to the extent practicable, with minimal wetland impacts, leading to the average home lot being approximately 2.1 acres. The site will be accessed via W. Branch Rd (Co. Rd. 151). Domestic water may be obtained from Minnetrista or domestic wells. Each lot will have a septic field. a. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existingfacility. Emphasize: I) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. This EAW discusses the proposed residential redevelopment of the Lakeview Golf Course site in Orono, MN. Fifty five lots are currently proposed for the site, with an average lot size of approximately 2.1 acres to match current zoning. The developer of the site has made it a priority to: • Work with the existing topography so as to minimize the necessary grading. • Maintain and strive and to improve the existing open space, wetland and natural features of the site. This includes partnerships with the local watershed district. • Create a new neighborhood that residents, neighbors and the city can be proud of. The proposed residences are planned to be large, single family ramblers or two story houses. Above grade square footages are anticipated to be from 2,800 to 3,800 square feet with the overall finished square footage totaling 4,300 to 6,000 square feet. The homes may be serviced by municipal water from neighboring Minnetrista, or possibly on-site water wells. Individual septic fields will be located on each lot to manage effluent. Road access to the site is planned to be via W. Branch Road (Co. Rd. 15 1) near the southeast corner of the site. One principal road will run through the site with four cul-de-sac offshoots. Existing natural resources will be conserved to the degree practicable. Wetlands will be preserved and impacts will be avoided where feasible and possible. Any anticipated wetland impact will be sequenced and mitigated following the procedure established by the US Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit and the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Woodlands are primarily located along the edges of the site and many trees are expected to be retained. The existing structures associated with the golf course will be removed. This includes drain tile underlying areas of the course and the septic field for the current clubhouse. Additional language regarding modification of the Project site, removal of existing structures and timing and duration of construction activities will appear throughout the EAW narrative. b. Project magnitude: Total Project Acrea e 149.8 Acres Number and type of residential traits 55 single family Proposed Right of Way 6,800 Lineal Feet Commercial buildin area (insquare feet) N/A page 2 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Industrial building area (insquare feet) N/A Institutional buildin area insquare feet N/A Conservation Easement Area 65.6 Acres Structure height(s) 2 sto housing d. Explain the projectpurpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the needfor the project and idents its beneficiaries. The project's purpose is to redevelop the Lakeview Golf Course into a new residential neighborhood. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? ❑ Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development. Cover Type Before After Cover Type Before After Wetlands* 14.4 14.4 Lawn/landsca in *** 124.2 53.8 Deep water/streams 0 0 Impervious surface 4.2 14.1 Unmaintained Meadow / Woodlands" 6.3 65.6 Stormwater Treatment Devices 0 1.9 Cropland 0 0 Other (describe) TOTAL 149.8 1 149.8 *=Subject to wetland determination and potential mitigation requirements **=Includes Conservation Areas ***=The values for lawn equate to approximate area covered by existing golf course. 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms ofpub lie financial assistance including bondguarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed, See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Unit of government Type of ap lication Status MPGA NPDES/SDS Stormwater Permit To be submitted MDH Well scaling/abandonment To be submitted MDH Watermain plan review Dependent of receivin water from Minnetrista MDNR Work in Public Waters permit May be needed if road alignment approaches or crosses a Protected Waters wetland or pond. Orono Preliminary Plat review To be submitted Orono Final Plat review To be submitted page 3 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Orono Comprehensive Plan Process began with the Orono Planning Amendment Commission in fall 2013 and has been approved and sent to the Cit Council Minnehaha Creek Wetland Conservation Preliminary meetings and review with staff Watershed and Army Act(WCA)/404 Permit have been positive. Project goal is to work with Corps of Engineers the watershed staff to restore existing wetlands and green space to enhance stormwater Minnehaha Creek Erosion Control Plan Watershed management. Plans and documents to be submitted once project has surface and Orono and Minnehaha Comprehensive Surface Creek Watershed Water Management stormwater management issues addressed. Plan/Stormwater Mana ement 9. Land use: a. Describe: Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The site is currently the Lakeview Golf Course, which was developed in 1955. Small areas within the course are wetlands and water bodies. Adjacent areas are mostly single family residential homes. The North Arm of Lake Minnetonka is located to the northeast of the course across North Arm Dr. Wetlands are found along Lake Minnetonka and to the southwest of the project area. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The City of Orono passed a 2010-2030 Community Management Plan in September 2010. This plan fulfills state requirement for a comprehensive plan and lays out "established goals, policies and principles of the City of Orono" (p. 1-1). The plan states that "single family housing will be maintained as the predominant housing type" (Summary p. 5). Stewardship of Lake Minnetonka is also described as a priority, which means the city favors low density development. The city's 2009 Local Surface Water Management Plan provides ideas to "further reduce its pollutant load to Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake". The 2030 Land Use Plan labels the project site as "Park, Recreational, and Open Space", which matches the current use. However, on Oct. 21, 2013, the Orono Planning Commission voted in favor of modifying the Comprehensive Plan to make the Project site a "Rural Residential" area in line with current zoning. Many of the non -city plans or regulations are incorporated and explained in the Orono Community Plan. For example, Orono's partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is mentioned, as are Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework and 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Other pertinent land use regulations include State laws such as the Wetland Conservation Act of 1993. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc, The Project area is zoned as RR -113, which corresponds to "One Family Rural Residential — 2 Acres". Orono has official urban/rural divisions, and the project is near the divide. Portions of the page 4 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] eastern half of the project are within Orono's Shoreland Overlay District, specifically the Lakeshore Setback category. A wetland area along the southern border of the project is within a 100 year floodplain as defined by FEMA FIRM 27053CO284E. No wild or scenic rivers, critical areas or agricultural preserves are found in the project area. b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Iters 9a above, concentrating on implications far environmental effects. The Orono Community Management Plan anticipates that residential development will be the predominant form of development within the city. Residential development is compatible with adjacent land use and current zoning. A modification to the Comprehensive Plan has been initiated with the Planning Commission and City Council to make the development compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Large lot residential properties such as this project likely will be comparable to the golf course in terms of environmental effects. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposedproject to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The proposed project is compatible with adjacent land use. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County indicates that the bedrock underlying the Project is probably dolomitic siltstone of the St. Lawrence :Formation of the Upper Cambrian Level. Surficial geology for much of the Project area is likely Clayey Till (loam to clay loam) according to the Geologic Atlas for Hennepin County. The wetland/floodplain area in the south of the project has likely filled with postglacial organic matter. Karst features are not believed to be on site. b. Soils and topography -Describe the soils on the site, givingNRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils, A soils investigation performed in October 2013 revealed that much of the Project area contains "Lean Clays" for the first 10 or so feet below ground level. As the depth increased, the "Lean Clays" tend to get supplanted by "Sandy Lean Clays". The NRCS branch of the USDA indicates nearly half of the project site is predominantly soil from the Lester -Kilkenny complex. These soils are mostly loams or clay loams that occur on slopes of 6-25%, and experience some erosion. Generally these soils are expected to drain moderately well or better. The second largest complex is the Hamel overwash — Hamel complex, which occupies nearly 17.9% of the project area. Hamel complex soils are principally loams or clay loams and have somewhat poor to poor drainage abilities. Generally these soils appear in lowlands. The third most prominent soil type is an Angus -Kilkenny complex that constitutes around 14.4% of the project area. Angus -Kilkenny soils are mostly in upland areas and consist of loam and clay loam. They are projected to drain well to moderately well. ]Figure XXXX shows the surficial soil types. Given the loamy characteristics of soil, wind and slope erosion should not be a concern, provided erosion control and sediment control best management practices are followed. page 5 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.!. and a. U. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water, Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within I mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory (PWI) number(s), if any. The largest water body within the Project Area is a 7 acre unnamed lake (PWI #: 27094500) located on the east side of the property. Another six small and unnamed ponds (0.1-0.25 acres) are located throughout the Project area, typically near the edge of the property. Various small streams and drainage ditches run through the property, some of which drain to the unnamed lake on the property. The National Wetland Inventory indicates that there are around 5.6 acres of wetland areas, excluding the ponds previously mentioned. The largest (PWI # 27094400) is located in the center of the southern edge of the property and is approximately 4.25 acres in size. It is categorized as a Palustrine Emergent wetland that is seasonally flooded (PEMC), and also makes up the 100 year event floodplain. No special designations were discovered within the Project Area. The only water related designations within 1 mile of the project are water body impairments. All are related to bays of Lake Minnetonka or water bodies that feed into the lake. The impaired waters, as categorized by the MPCA, are: Painter Creek (07010206-700), Jennings Bay (27013315), Lake Minnetonka -West Arm (27013314), Forest Lake (27013900), Lake Minnetonka -North Arm (27013313), Stubbs Bay (27013312) and Maxwell Bay (27013311). H. Groundwater -- aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) ifproject is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. Groundwater levels fluctuate somewhat throughout the site, with most groundwater believed to be approximately 20-25 feet from the surface based on data from an onsite well. The soils investigation revealed groundwater as little as 9-15 feet below the surface at a select few sites. There are additional aquifers at and below confining bedrock levels: Prairie Du Chien -Jordan Aquifer, Franconia -Ironton - Galesville Aquifer, and Mt. Simon -Hinckley Aquifer. Depths to these aquifers are not precisely known, but it is expected the Prairie Du Chien -Jordan Aquifer would be 75-90 feet below ground level. This aquifer is the most likely to be accessed by wells. The project is not within a MDH wellhead protection area or special well construction area. Six well sites were identified on the MDH web page, with one of these being and abandoned and sealed (248683). The five existing wells have MDH numbers: 122908, 163883, 205191, 225974, 225975. Many of the properties adjacent to Project site possess their own wells. b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b, i. through Item b. iv. below. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment faciliiy, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste page 6 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. The type of wastewater that will be generated will be primarily of domestic uses. No specialized commercial or industrial waste will be generated. An MPCA hazardous waste generator permit will not be required. Based on preliminary analysis from the septic design team, the lots will be served by individual mound -style SSTS systems. The design flow is based on 600 gallons per day per dwelling. The mound systems will not discharge directly to any aquifer or surficial groundwater area. The use of the mound system provides the maximum amount of surficial soil treatment and minimizes risk of contamination by groundwater sources. The sites will be placed at a sufficient uphill distance from any wetland or muck type soil. Figure XXXX shows anticipated drainf eld locations and typical mound system cross section. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction, Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runofffrom the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls andpotential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. The proposed stormwater management system will be designed to limit peak runoff to existing flow rates based on the 1, 10, and 100 -year 24-hour events. Approximately 2.0 acres of filtration stormwater management devices will filter or infiltrate the first 1 inch of runoff as to provide acceptable water quality management. The proposed stormwater drainage routes will closely follow existing drainage patterns both in rate and volume on an average annual basis. Figure XXXX displays the current stormwater management plan concept. The filtration devices will be sized to meet required MCWD volume management standards based on infiltration or filtration. it is the goal of the project to work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed staff to restore the onsite wetlands and remaining open areas , through the creation of conservation easement areas throughout the site. A nearby water body, Forest Lake, requires a TMDL based on nutrients. The proposed stormwater management plan will reduce the overall TP to this lake by providing filtration and infiltration BMPs compared to existing conditions of allowing uncontrolled runoff from golf course turf areas, where excess fertilizer and high nutrient -laden runoff is common for runoff leaving the golf course site. All newly constructed impervious surfaces will be treated by stormwater BMPs before routing downstream to existing wetland or water features. At a minimum, there will be a SWPPP that will address both construction BMPs and permanent BMPs that will be in place before, during and after major site grading operations. The SWPPP will contain an Erosion Control Plan, which details specific BMPs and shows the locations, both temporary and permanent, that will address page 7 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] sediment tracking, soil stabilization, sediment traps including silt fence, and protection measures for permanent stormwater management features. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. The Project site is currently proposed to connect to city water from Minnetrista. If a water connection agreement cannot be reached between the cities of Minnetrista and Orono, then on site wells shall be used for water. Anticipated water use will be reduced when compared to the existing Golf Course site. Per the 2011 DNR water appropriation records, the golf course currently uses 20 MG of water per year. Water use is anticipated to lower by a factor of 113 when the Project site is converted to residential use combined with preservation of wetland and open space. The reduction factor includes estimated irrigation of lawns (9000 gal/week/dwelling) and dwelling water consumption (300 gal/day/dwelling). iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, falling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. The Project site will maintain all existing wetland areas where practicable. Subdivision and ROW placement will account for wetland preservation as a key factor for the development site layout. If any wetland impact is proposed, then the impact will be sequenced through the WCA LGU process. If the impact is allowed through sequencing, then replacement wetlands will be provided within the same watershed preferably within the project site boundary. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, count)'/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in -water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. Little to no watercraft use currently occurs on the ponds and streams located on the Project area. Development is not expected to significantly alter watercraft use. This project is not expected to alter any existing lake littoral area, or alter existing downstream water bodies. page 8 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 12. Contamination/Hazardous MaterialslWastes: a. Pre project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfalls, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Lakeview Golf Course has a small to minimal quantity hazardous waste generator permit. This designation indicates some hazardous waste may be produced or stored on the premises, but is unlikely to be a widespread contamination issue, If any environmental issues are discovered, it would likely be small, de minimis conditions in the vicinity of the golf cart/maintenance building in the west side of the parking area, or around the barn structure located on the northwest quadrant of the course. A review of the MPCA "What's In My Neighborhood" database revealed that three residences adjacent to the Project had leaks of petroleum products in the late 1980s through mid 1990s. No other issues were displayed in the online MPCA database. The MPCA investigated the leak sites and has declared them to be "closed". The MPGA data on these sites is not extensive, but it was noted that no groundwater contamination occurred in any of these cases; therefore it is unlikely contamination spread significant distances. Metal barrels and other debris were observed in a creek ravine toward the southeast corner of the property. The current property owner, who is a long time course operator, was asked about these barrels and described them as old burn barrels used to burn garbage from 1960-1961. This practice potentially occurred in the late 1950s as well. Once the barrels were worn out, they were discarded into the ravine. The property owner indicates this is the only location on the property where barrels and wastes were discarded. The barrels displayed significant rust and disrepair corroborating the timeline and explanation. In conclusion, construction activities are not expected to encounter the leak sites because they are not within the project area. It is also unlikely that construction would occur in the creek ravine. The demolition and removal of the golf cart/maintenance building and the barn structure may uncover pollution, but the quantity is likely small enough to have little impact. Therefore it is expected construction would not have an adverse impact on the known environmental conditions, or be effected by them. A thorough Phase I ESA has not been conducted to fortify these conclusions. If hazardous substances are encountered during construction, the Response Action Plan following MPCA provisions and standards shall be followed to contain the issue and minimize impacts. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generatedlstored during construction and/or operation of the project. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Demolition of existing buildings, structures and pavement are likely to be the largest sources of wastes associated with the construction of the project. Waste material shall be stored in appropriate containers and hauled to an authorized offsite disposal station. Careful demolition and collection of debris would limit environmental impacts. The homes to be built as part of the final development will produce domestic wastes that would be disposed of as garbage and recycling, much like other houses in the area. page 9 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials — Describe chemicalslhazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Liquid fuels will be utilized by construction equipment and small quantities of fuel will be stored on site during construction. Compressed air and gas cylinders may be used for construction purposes. Upon completion of construction, individual home owner may own or store small quantities of hazardous materials (for example, a gas can for lawn equipment). Due to the small amount of hazardous materials utilized during construction and the relatively short time frame of construction, it is believed construction activities will not constitute a significant risk of releasing hazardous materials to the project site or adjacent areas. Given that it is unknown what hazardous materials, or quantities, future homeowner may possess, it is difficult to extrapolate potential effects or prevention strategies. To prevent spills and environmental impacts, a spill prevention plan will be utilized by the construction contractor. c. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes — Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. No hazardous wastes are anticipated to be produced by the project. if hazardous wastes are produced, the Project developer will follow applicable standards and laws for storage and disposal of the waste. Future residents of the Project may produce and store household hazardous wastes. 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. A review of the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MBS) indicates there are no "Natural Communities" within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The nearest resource is Lowry Woods approximately 0.5 miles to the north, which is a Maple -Basswood forest. The woodland areas along the edge of the course likely serve as habitat for birds and small mammals. A few of the ponds and creeks on the Project site appear to be inhabited by crawfish. b. Describe rare features such as state -listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- __) and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNS. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results, Results from the NNIS database search will be forthcoming. page 10 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems maybe affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. There are no known threatened or endangered species inhabiting the site. Woodlands and wetlands will be retained to the extent practicable, which will help mitigate impacts to wildlife, Human habitation on the course, particularly the additional presence of domestic cats and dogs, may decrease the local small animal population. Invasive plant species such as buckthorn are presently widespread on the course, and may be removed if desired by the city and neighbors. Tree removal will be in accordance with city ordinances. d. Identify measures that will betaken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. Woodlands and wetlands will be retained to the extent practicable, as mentioned in c. above. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include, I) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Idents measures that will betaken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects.to historic properties. The SHPO database office was consulted and responded with their findings on Dec. 31, 2013. Two historic properties are located to the south of the Project Area: the LaPointe house at 4000 North Shore Drive and Bridge 90480 (CSAR 19[N Shore Dr/W Arm Channel). One archaeological site labeled as `Barto" is known to be in the southern vicinity of the Project Area. This site is labeled as an earth work site. The precise location of this site is not readily available at this time. No impacts to historic structures are anticipated. It is believed that the archaeological site is not within the project area, and will not be impacted. Further consultation with the SHPO office hopefully will yield a more definite location of the archaeological site. 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vaporplumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Idents any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. A row of conifers is planned to be provide screening on the west side of the project. Orono has a "dark skies" goal, which will be achieved through homeowner covenant policies in regards to lighting. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used to assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Idents pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. page 11 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] The only principle source of emissions from the Project will be the individual homes of residents. These emissions are anticipated to be on par with the surrounding area. b. Vehicle emissions -Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle -related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle -related emissions. Project development will lead to additional car trips through the Project area. Construction vehicles will have greater emissions than standard domestic vehicles. c. Dust and odors -Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. On site grading will be limited to roads and storm water ponds, so dust generation should be short in duration. Dust may be addressed in the SWPPP application. Odors are not anticipated. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. Some noise is currently associated with day to day course operation, with the noisier activities including turf mowing, leaf blowing, and tee shots, No significant noise generation is anticipated from the final Project. Construction activities will add noise, but are not anticipated to be greater than a typical housing development proj ect. 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic -related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. The main traffic within the Project site will be the residents. Parking for residents will be on their own property with ample on street parking for visitors. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EA W. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. Hennepin County Traffic Planning has reviewed the site and found no traffic or congestion concerns based on the proposed land use change. A traffic report has not been requested by any governmental units. page 12 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] c. Identify measures that will betaken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Impacts to the Project area are likely to be most prominent during Project construction. Once residences are built and infrastructure is installed, impacts will likely be minimal and similar to the present situation. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. It is not anticipated that there will be significant environmental effects due to the cumulative effects of the project. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental ,4ssessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Title Date page 13 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR CITIZENS FOR LAKEVIEW PRESERVATION INFORMATION SUBMITTAL (Not submitted yet as this goes to print) 3��3 [C Item #01 - Special Council Meeting - 01/0 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 9Er— m -sem Lakeview Golf - Public Comments Received 8-14-13 Hoffman - incl. 2 -page petition 10-6-13 Davisson 1016-13 Sladek 10-16-13 Mitchell 10-16-13 Iverson 10-16-13 Gillis Items above included in 10-21-13 PC Packet 10-18-13 Larson 10-18-13 Johnson 10-18-13 Pellizer 10-18-13 7 -Page Petition 10-21-13 Iverson Addendum 10-21-13 Page 8 of Petition Above 6 item distributed to PC at 10/21/13 meeting 10-21-13 Pages 9 and 10 of Petition (Deceived at 10-21-13 PC Meeting) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10-28-13 Eastman & Hager 11-12-13 Tom Casey o/b/o Bell & Kline 11-12-13 Sapa Carlson 1142-13 Brenda Johnson Above 4 items distributed to Council at 11112113 meeting 11-13-13 Sapa 1.1-13-1.3 Tom Casey o/b/o Bell & Kline 11-13-13 George Daniels 11-14-13 Lorsung 11-14-13 Bryce Johnson 11-22125-13 Brenda Johnson 12-5/6-13 Brenda Johnson 1226-13 James Beck 12-27-13 Dr. R. Biesterfeld 1-2-14 Lee Harren Above 10 items included in packet for 116114 meeting Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Gaffron From: saps [sapa@saparealtor.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 93, 2093 2:37 PM To: bbartelt@lundaconstruction.com; bclose@subrad.com; brian.brantner@ambpress.com; Benjamin. Hinnenkamp@co.hennepin.mn.us; Correy Farniok; Cara. Lee@co.hen nepin.mn.us; ChesterYanik@YanikCompanies.com; d.yanik@mchsi.com; dandan@boulderprop,com; darcy.a.diederich@xcelenergy.com; dickc-9@mchsi.com; dlarson@imagineps.com; Dgalbraith@networkdesigninc.com; erisajd@citlink.net; jflinn@deloitte.com; Jesse Struve; James.Archer@co.hennepin.mn,us; JErtmer@jny.com; kingcrom@q.com; Ken.Anderson@lifetech.com; Kirk.Meintsma@metromech.com; mickfreund@gmail.com; mj4llfe@citlink.net; mknodl@hclib.org; Maury. Hooper@co.hennepin.mn.us; MEMadvCO@aol.com; Mike Gaffron; Minnesotamur9@frontier.com; nancybloms@yahoo.com; nanw@parkprint.com; nate.arnold@cbre.com; planpher@mchsi.com; rick.sterling@rbc.com; scsu8622@yahoo.com; Scott Oberaigner; ssigel@cisco.com; susmn@yahoo.com; Arthur. Saunders@co.hen nepi n.mn.us; kdooley@minnehahacreek.org; billyboybuff@yahoo.com; tim@loriellne.com; timgolden@yahoo.com; Tom.Meersman@startribune.com; Kristin.lnman- Koval@co.hennepin.mn.us; kristinhartl2@gmail.com; lindertjkkj@yahoo.com; sstevenson@uscompliance.com; hojoehowel@aol.com; garyamykroells@yahoo.com; ryanalness@yahoo.com; jim@avantidp.com; petersammy@mac,com; forestlake@frontiernet.net; Izuckman9@gmail.com; bobdongoske@yahoo.com Cc: brycevjohnson@gmail.com Subject: RE: forest lake bay - urgent Sapa, Thanks so much for these efforts. We were successful at the Orono City Council meeting last night in getting a 60 day delay on the developer's efforts to change the Lakeview "guidance". The vote was 4-0. The council meeting should be available by video on the Orono website soon. We will be communicating with those who signed the petition and provided email or phone numbers. We are also looking for volunteers with special skill sets and/or time and passion for this. If you have an interest, tali Robyn Johnson at 612-396-5688 as I will be out of town for a few days. Best Regards, Bryce Sapa Cell: 692.306.9060 To get the coolest free Real Estate App for your smart phone teat SAPA to 612-234-5777. Links with your gps and instantly gives you the price on any house! From: sapa [mailto:sapa@saparealtor.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:47 AM To: 'bbartelt@lundaconstruction.com ; ' bclose@su brad.com'; 'brian.brantner@a mbpress.com'; 'Benjamin.Hinnenkamp@co.hennepin.mn.us'; 'cfarniok@ci.orono.mn.us'; 'Cara.Lee@co.hennepin.mn.us; 'ChesterYanik@YanikCompanies.cam'; 'd.yanik@mchsi.com; 'dandan@boulderprop.com'; 'darcy.a.diederich@xcelenergy.com;'dickc-l@mchsi.com'; 'diarson@imagineps.com 'Dgalbraith@networkdesigninc.com ; 'erisajd@citlink.net; 'jflinn@deloitte.com ;'jstruve@ci.orono.mn.us'; 'James.Archer@co.hennepin.m n.us; 'J Ertmer@jny.com'; 'kingcrom @q.com'; 'Ken.Anderson@lifetech.com ; 'Kirk.Meintsma@metromech.com'; 'mickfreund@gmail.com; 'mj4life@citlink.net'; 'mknodl@hclib.org'; 'Maury.Hooper@co.hennepin.mn.us'; 'MEMadvCO@aol.com'; 'MGaffron@ci.orono.mn.us; 'Minnesotamurl@frontier.com'; 'nancybloms@yahoo.com'; 'nanw@parkprint.com'; 'nate.arnold@cbre.com'; 'planpher@mchsi.com;'rick.sterling@rbc.com; 'scsu8622@yahoo.com'; 'soberaigner@ci.orono.mn.us; Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] 'ssigel@cisco.com;'susmn@yahoo.com'; 'Arthur.Saunders@co.hennepin.mn.us';'kdooley@minnehahacreek.org'; 'billyboybuff@yahoo.com'; 'tim@lorieline.com'; 'timgolden@yahoo.com; 'Tom.Meersman@startribune.com'; 'Kristin. Inman -Koval @co. hennepin.mn. us'; 'kristinhartl2 @gmail.com'; 'lindertjkkj@yahoo.com'; 'sstevenson@uscompliance.com'; 'hojoehowel@aol.com; 'garyamykroells@ya hoo.com ; 'ryanalness@yahoo.com'; 'jim@avantidp.com'; 'petersa mmy@mac.com'; 'forestlake@frontiernet.net'; 'Iaucl<manl@gmail.com'; 'bobdongoske@yahoo.com' Cc: 'brycevjohnson@gmail.com' Subject: forest lake bay - urgent Hi Neighbors, lifted your emails from the forest lake bridge closure notices from last year. Wanted to notify you about the proposed changes at Lakeview GC. I don't think there will be many emails about this but if you want to opt out please just let me know and I will remove your name from the list. There is a petition attached that asks the Orono City Council to stop moving forward with the development of Lakeview Golf Course acrd first, conduct an environmental impact/assessment study. The plan is for 50+ homes to be constructed at Lakeview ... all of that run off and added traffic will have a big impact on our homes and our lake. There is also a public hearing tonight. Please attend if you can. The info flyer is attached. The goal is to get as many signatures as possible within this short timeframe. If you would like to sign please do so and return to me at saga@sapaRealtor.com or, to bryiceviohnson@gmail.com Or you can drop this at Bryce's house at 580 N arm (across from the pond at lakeview — he has a box outside) or, at my house 1015 Linden Lane. Bryce is heading up this effort. Also please feel free to pass this email along to your neighbors and concerned people in the area. Thanks, Sapa To get the coolest free Real Estate App for your smart phone text SADA to 612-234-5777. Links with your gps and instantly gives you the price on any house! Sapa Carlson 9 Realtor, GRI, ABR, CL.HMS, SUPER AGENT-Mpls/St Paul Mag & TC Business Monthly Counselor Realty Celle 612.306.1050 Fax: 763.416.24991 Main: 763.420.7080 sapaCa),sapaRealt_or.com http://www.sgparealtor.com/ THOMAS E. CASEY Attorney at Lav 2854 Cambridge Lane Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-1099 (office) tcasey@frontiernet.net November 13, 2013 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Gaffron Assistant City Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 VIA E-MAIL ONLY mgaffron@ci.orono.rnn.us RE: Government Data Practices Act Request Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan — Lakeview Golf Course Orono, Minnesota Dear Mr. Gaffron, My clients, Steve Bell and Jane Kline, are considering modifications and/or additions to their Government Data Practices Act request, filed yesterday as part of my letter to the City Council. Therefore, to avoid duplicate requests, please suspend any work on my clients' request until further direction. Thank you. Very truly yours, qk5 Thomas E. Casey TECIrf cc: Steve Bell and Jane Kline file Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Geffroln From: George Daniels [dandan@boulderprop.comj Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:17 AM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: LAKEVIEW SITE PLAN Thanks forgetting back to me. It will be most interesting to see what this group comes up with. In the heart of Wayzata on Wayzata Boulevard we have the Big Woods project. A group of citizens thought it should stay the Big Woods in perpetuity. They got the Land Trust to tie in with it and then they were able to get the city to float a bond issue ... it passed. Now we have the Big Woods that no one uses and most people don't know it's there. i am sure this group will go to the Land Trust who have lots of attorneys and lots of people. They will then go to the Wenksterns to donate part of the property for future good... perhaps their legacy ... then they ask the city to float a bond issue. Of course time and timing is everything and this isn't the Big Woods. it is a wonderful piece of property that should be developed as a RPUD.... makes lots of sense. All of the issues brought up by the other side will be addressed i.e. run off into lake Minnetonka, traffic, trails etc. by the developer, as required. I'm assuming the developer was undeterred by the meeting and will keep moving forward. Things change and while many of the people that got up say, we don't have any problems with Mr. Wenkstern selling, they really do because underneath they think they have an entitlement to the property... not so! I will keep coming! Good planning is good planning and that is what these people don't understand. Please keep me informed as to what is going on. If the group comes up with the money ... their own money, their own investors, I will be surprised. My sense is they will be back to the City of Orono... asking! 1 Best Regards, George Daniels 21 Powered by CardScan From: Mike Gaffronfmailto:MGaffron@ci.orono.mn.usj Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:01 AM To:'George Daniels' Subject: RE: LAKEVIEW SITE PLAN Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Hi, George — Thanks for presenting your viewpoint - not easy when the assembled crowd is heading the opposite direction. The Council voted 4-0 (one member had to leave before it was over) to table, and extended the deadline for Council action another 60 days to January 24. They asked the applicants to provide as much additional detailed information on the site plan as they can by the end of December, and scheduled a special meeting devoted to just Lakeview on Monday January 6, 7:00 p.m. which would be followed up by Council action on the Comp Plan Amendment a week later at their regular January 13 meeting. Now we will see whether the neighborhood organization can come up with some option that is workable for all parties... Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator / Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 From: George Daniels[mailto:dandan(&boulderprop.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:48 AM To: Mike Gaffron Subject. Re: LAKEVIEW SITE PLAN Good Morning! I attended the meeting last night as a force of one. Since it is a public form Everyone gets to speak and they did. Your NAC person certainly did an effective job. think the developers have an excellent plan with the RPUD. So my question Mike since left a bit early, was the other side able to sway the council to delay for 60 days the change to the Comp Plan? Also Thank You for taking the time to meet with me yesterday. George Daniels Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Mike Gaffron ¢MGaffron@ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: George — A jpeg copy of the site plan is attached. The proposed development does not meet any of the thresholds for requiring an EIS. It also does not appear to be in any of the mandatory categories for an EAW. Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator / Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] From: George Daniels fmailto:dandan(&boulderprop.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12;38 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: LAKEVIEW SITE PLAN Hi Mike, I live on 1375 Park Drive. I would like to see the Lakeview Golf Course development plan. I tried you web site but it does not work when you try to bring up the plan. Could you send me an attachment. I am not necessarily for or against but would like to see it before I form an opinion. Does this development require and EIS? Look forward to hearing back. George Daniels 0 by CardScan <Concept Plan - Revised Access 10-21-13 JPEG.jpg> 3 Mike Gaffron From: Rose Lorsung [rlorsung@pulselandgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:04 AM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: City Council meeting outcome Thank you mike, much appreciated. Thanks, Rose Lorsung 952-457-7641 ,Rose A. Lor6Bns, Owner Pulse Land Group, We, t'teCREATE Real Estate,, LLC., `F (952-) 457.7641 F (612) 436.4901 la ti. Box 964: Wayzata, MN 55391 �p rullsella n d gra up.to ran riecr�eatelu uryhomes coral Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] F PULSE eR E E Oft ,._ K L Al GROUP REAL ESTATIE Inc From: Mike Gaffron[mailto;MGaffron(aci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:51 AM To: 'Rose Lorsung' Subject: RE: City Council meeting outcome Tabled, 4-0. Review period extended for 60 days to January 24, 2014. Special Council meeting set for Monday, January 6, 7:00 p.m. to review additional information to be provided by developer re septic testing, final wetland boundaries, etc. with nothing but Lakeview on that agenda. Probable final action on the Comp Plan amendment to occur at regular meeting of January 13. Curing this extended review period the organized neighbors have indicated they will be exploring alternatives to Lakeview being developed; we do not know what they might propose, but owner and developer have a purchase agreement, so that whatever the neighbors come up with will likely have to be accepted by owner and developer in order to gain any traction with the Council. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator / Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 From: Rose Lorsung [ma iIto: rlorsung@pulselandgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:53 AM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: City Council meeting outcome Importance: High Mike, Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 Total Pa 9 What was the vote for the golf course conversion this week by City Council? I have a court date tomorrow rI y client and we are following this developer and reaction to the PUD portion of the request. This is due to the fact that all the restrictions narrows the number of lots on the Long Lake site and it also more importantly creates lots that don't have great building pads, views of the lake etc. Some flexibility at gross allowed density here would go a very long way towards a better site layout. Thanks, Rose Lorsung 952-457-7641 Rosin A, Larsung, Owner Pulse Land Group, Mo. ReGREATE R&&-JESfat&, LILQ TOS -57•x'641 F(612)435-4901 iP O. Box 964 Wayzata, MN 55391 paisagandgroupxo.m recreataluux uryhome wcom PULSE� u -al Lo"REATE AINL GROUP FECAL CSTATE Inc Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Gaffron From: Lili McMillan Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:43 PM To: Jessica Loftus; Mike Gaffron; Soren Mattick Subject: FW; Council Meeting Follow- up From: Bryce Johnson [brycevjohnson@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:14 PM To: Lili McMillan; Kristi Anderson; Cynthia Bremer; Lizz Levang (clevang ao_1_.com); Aaron H. Printup Cc: Tom Mazer; Robyn Johnson Subject: Council Meeting Follow- up Dear Members of the Orono City Council, On behalf of the Citizens for Lakeview Preservation, I would like to express our appreciation for the consideration given to those who attended the Council Meeting on Tuesday evening. Your sensitivity in preparing for a large turnout, combining and expediting more routine agenda items, and taking the time to listen to all who wanted to speak showed a respect for your constituents that encouraged, rather than discouraged, participation. The careful scrutiny with which you received the recommendation of the Planning Commission showed our most skeptical friends that you remain open to public input and that the process is indeed an open one as well. While gratified that our desire for a 60 day delay was realized, we understand that you are also seeking more data from the amendment applicant and desire sufficient information for all possible outcomes. For our part, we perceive that you understand and encourage our efforts to find an alternative use for Lakeview that could maintain its present guidance, respect the property rights of the owner, and involve the most acceptable combination of public and private support. We intend to take on this challenge with a collective zeal that continues to grow and energize us. Based on your comments (and our interest) we will be reaching out to you individually over the next 60 days to get your input and suggestions as we work for an end state for Lakeview that fulfills the wishes of the vast majority of Orono's residents. Thank you again for your dedication to this wonderful city. Sincerely, Bryce V. Johnson Citizens for Lakeview Preservation 1 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Gaffron From: Brenda Johnson [brenda@umn.edu] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:51 AM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: Re: topographical or elevation maps/surveys of Lakeview property Attachments: 1957 wn-1t-113.jpg; 1960 mcy-6-83.jpg Mike, Thank you for the links. I have been to both and will send you the arial shots from the Borchert library. In past years I used the Borchert Map Library and had the help of their assistants to improve my mapping skills using GIS software. I was focusing on using it for public health purposes. I appreciate your assistance. I may be in to have copies made. What is the typical time frame for getting copies? I will attach a couple of the maps I found FYI. Brenda Johnson On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1.0:50 AM, Mike Gaffron <MGaffron2ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Brenda - Elevation surveys prior to or early in the development of Lakeview? All we have for topography from that era is the USGS Quad topography map dated 1953/1958 at a scale of 1" = 2000'. I have copied that section of the map -- Lakeview is about 1.5" x 2" and it only shows 10' contours. Not digitized, and didn't scan very well, but copy attached. Any elevation surveys of Lakeview at any date? We have 2 -foot contours flown in 1991-92 at a scale of 1" = 100' for the entire City. These are not digitized, and are on large paper sheets roughly 3' x 3'. Difficult but not impossible to copy in sections at $1.00 per 11x17 sheet. Arial photo's or maps of the golf course? We have aerial photos of the entire City at varying quality from various years starting in 1955. The 1955 set is B&W, 1" = 200' scale, and not easily copied. Newer ones are mostly blue -line prints and not the greatest quality. One source for both airphotos and topography to try is http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/index.html, and you might also try the Borchert Map Library at the U of M: http://mgp.lib.umn.edu/mhgpo/ Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator / Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Phone: (952)249-4600 Fax: 952 249-4616 From: Brenda Johnson [mailto:brenda(&umn.eduj Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 4;20 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: topographical or elevation maps surveys of Lakeview property Hello Mike, Do you have any of the following in City records? • Elevation surveys prior to or early in the development of Lakeview? • Any elevation surveys of Lakeview at any date? • Axial photo's or maps of the golf course? Are there other sources of this information that I access? Digging around on the web I found arial photos of the Lakes area I can show you sometime --1951-1971. They range in their granularity and quality but interesting if your are a history buff. Thank you. Brenda Johnson 2 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Gaffron From; Brenda Johnson [brenda@umn.edu] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 1:43 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: Re: History of Lakeview land use Thank you Mike. It is helpful. Stay warm. Brenda Johnson On Fri, Dee 6, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Mike Gaffron <MGaffron ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Brenda — We don't have much of what you are looking for. Our earliest permit records for the Lakeview site only go back to 1962, after the golf course was already in operation. We rarely find any permits in city files dating before 1960. Our records of prior owners (annual Hennepin County tax books) only go back to 1974. There are no land use maps before the 1970's, so you would probably have to rely on old airphotos and other record sources. We have access to just a few old plat maps that show land ownership from the 1800s. An 1873 map indicates parts of the site were owned by a "T. Cole" and a "Geo. Hunter". An 1890s map shows "J. Halgren", "C.C. Peterson", and "F.A. Harmon" as owners of various parcels that today make up the Lakeview property. We have no information on any of these persons. A title search or getting a copy of the property abstract might be needed to accurately identify the history of ownership. I don't have any idea whether the city of Medina has any old records on this area. You would have to ask them. I think your best sources for more info would be the West Hennepin County Pioneer Association Museum in Long Lake 952- 473-6557) and the Westonka Historical Society (952-472-9800). Seven Nations Park was donated by Pat Dickey when the 80 -acre farm property was subdivided. I don't know whether the Dickey family is still in this area. That donation was in the early 1990s. The only info I can get my hands on immediately is the attached excerpt from the 1997 Parks inventory. There may be Council or Park Commission memos and meeting minutes on how this park came about, but someone would have to do a bit of research here to find them, and I don't have that kind of time available... Hope this is helpful. Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator/ Long Terra Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952)249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 From: Brenda Johnson [maiito:brenda@umn.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:52 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: History of Lakeview land use Hello Mike, I would like to know the history of Lakeview parcels land use. Does the City have a file that would contain the previous owners, permits, land use and anything historic about the property? I have researched the DNR LiDAR files, talked with the State Archaeologist, MN Indian Cultural Affairs, as well as searched the Borchart Library for topographical information. Very interesting sites and helpful staff! I would like to know the names of previous owners of the property to then go to the history center in Orono (or their electronic files) to . I understand Orono was part of Medina prior to becoming Orono. Would information about Orono be located in Medina or would it have been transferred? Who donated property to become Seven Nations Natural Area? Are there electronic minutes that I could browse to get a background of that process? Do you know if they are Native Americans and does the family still live in Orono? I do have two early plat maps but anything else you can provide me would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Brenda Johnson 2 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] CITIZENS FOR LAKEVIEW PRESERVATIOW, Fo Protecting Orono Open Space �� �� As a citizen, I request that the City of Orono uphold its Community Management Plan and loop the current guidance of Lakeview as "Park, Recreation and Open Space." a(--.�`-`--� ** 1 would like to see the .. ........ . Lakeview Golf PRINTED NAME (home owner) Course as: ;;, (MARK ONE) SIGi1iAT E [, Open Z0 Cafe= A }P� , au Recreational FULL ADDRESS Space El Housing EMAIL.. ADDRESS (and/or hone number if preferred) Subdivision ** I Would like PRINTED NAME (second home owner) to See the Lakeview Golf Course as; SIGNATURE .... _ (DARK ONE) E] Open FULL ADDRESS Recreational 0---- Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] c1j-jy 0r o oN _ rn. W_ www.OronoLa&eviewpresarvation.org Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Rim IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED ON JANUARY 13, OUR ORONO WAY OF LIFE 2014, 1AN ,20'¢ OiryOp ®pONO MAY CHANGE Dear Orono Citizens, Lakeview Golf Course, the largest privately owned public open space in Orono is slated for a housing subdivision. This 143 -acre tract of land is currently guided "Park, Recreation and Open Space" but Source Land Capital LLC, on behalf of Grant Wenkstern, has requested the City of Orono to amend the guidance to "Rural -Residential" so that the development can proceed. However, we believe changing the "Park, Recreation and Open Space" guidance breaks the promise of the 2008-2030 Orono Community Management Plan, which clearly states (Part 4E-30), "The City will encourage the preservation of private open space" and "Once land is developed, the opportunity for its preservation as open space is lost' We, Citizens for Lakeview Preservation, Inc., a MN non-profit, ask your help to: PRESERVE the land and maintain it as "Park, Recreation and Open Space." PROTECT the integrity of the 2008-2030 Orono Community Management Plan, a contract with the people of Orono who themselves have invested to live here. RESPECT the property rights of the landowner by providing an alternative use and compensation for his property. We offer a much better alternative to development that fits the current guidance of the land. Our vision includes a natural habitat and interpretive center as well as an eco -friendly golf course certified by the Audubon Society and supported by the First Tee organization. Cultural and educational opportunities are interwoven. Other organizations with whom we have spoken to stand ready to help. You can be a part of this — help us keep the land and shape the vision. Because once it is gone, it's gone forever? What can y®u d®? FIRST — Sign this petition of support and. fax (952-472-4698), scan and email to info@_oronolakeviewpreservation.org or mail immediately, no later.than January 3, to Citizens for Lakeview Preservation, P.O. Box 96, Navarre, MN 55392. Please use the enclosed return envelope. CONTINUED ON BACK , CUT ON DOTTED LINE As a citizen, I request that the City of Orono uphold its Community Management Plan and keep the current guidance of Lakeview as "Park, Recreation and Open Space." Pd rather he Lee C. Marren at the l75 Landmark Dr Printed 1, lake! Long Lake, MN 55356-9227 Z�Z Signature (Homeowner) e� / full Address Email Address (and/or phone number if preferred) Printed Name (homeowner) Signature (Homeowner) Full Address Email Address (and/or phone number re j November 21, 2013 Source Land Capital Patrick Hiller, et al 18215 45th ,Ave. N., Suite D Plymouth, MN 55446 Item #01- Special Cbuncil Meeting - 01106114 — File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fox (952) 249.4646 Orono, MN 55356 I Crystal Say, MN 55323 1 wwwxl,orono,mmus Orono Zoning File 13-3638 & 13-3639 - Lakeview Golf 60 -Day Extension Dear Mr. Hiller: On September 27, 2013 the City of Orono considered your applications for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan Review for the property at 405 North Arm Drive to be complete. Reviews by the Orono Planning Commission on October 21, 2013 and Orono City Council on November 12 have -resulted in tabling of the applications pending receipt of additional information from various parties. The City Council tabled the applications to a special meeting to be held Monday, January 6, 2014, 7:00 pm in the Orono Council Chambers. `1'bis letter is your notification that the City is extending the time period for City action on. applications #13-3638 and 013-3639 under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(f), The time period for action on this application is extended until January 24, 2013. No action is required on your part regarding this extension. Steve-Grittrnan will be contacting you regarding desired information submittals for the January 6 meeting. Please contact nae at 952.249.4622 or m�crffron@aI, orona. nln. W if you have questions on this matter. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant City Administrator / Long Terra Strategy cc: Grant Wenkstern 710 North Shore Drive W. Mound, MN 55364 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] C/3' MEMORANDUM January b Special Meeting To: Mayor and City Council City Administrator From: Mike Gaffron, Asst. City Administrator Date: January 2, 2014 Subject: Development Analysis - Dickey/Coffin/Thompson Properties Exhibits: A - Area Map B - Airphoto C - Mapped Wetlands D - Platted Easements Depiction E - Interior Trail Plan & Description Staff was asked by the Mayor to provide an analysis of a past development in Orono similar in scope to the Lakeview Golf property, in order to assist Council in its review of the current proposal. The development that is perhaps most similar in size, topographic constraints and zoning category to the Lakeview Golf site would be the group of subdivisions located between Watertown Road and the Luce Line Trail, on either side of Old Crystal Bay Road. See the map in Exhibit A. The property groupings that resulted in the current development pattern are labeled as "Coffin", Dickey" and "Thompson" reflecting the major ownership pattern prior to development, which occurred mostly in the 1980s -90s. The properties were platted in phases over a period of years and encompass approximately 175 gross acres. The original 1982 six -lot plat of Countryside Manor included a ghost -platting of how the remaining acreage in the Dickey property might be developed. The two Old Crystal Bay Road Additions in 1994 each encompassed lands on both sides of Old Crystal Bay Road, merging the Coffin and remaining Dickey properties into a single subdivision process. Pre-existing homesites not part of subdivisions....... 3 lots 1982 Countryside Manor .............................. 6 lots 1984 Countryside Manor 2nd Addition ............... 5 lots 1994 Old Crystal Bay Road Addition ............... 24 lots 1994 Old Crystal Bay Road 2nd Addition........... 21 lots 1999 Crystal Bay Preserve .......................... .8 lots Total within study boundary 67 lots These properties are not within the MUSA and are served by private septic systems and wells. These subdivisions are served by approximately 1.5 miles of private roads constituting roughly 9 acres in area. The only areas not incorporated into individual lots are the road system and the 3 - acre Seven Nations Park parcel. This yields an average lot area net of roads and parks as follows: 175 gross acres - 9 acres road - 3 acres park = 163 acres / 67 lots = 2.43 acres avg. lot area Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Properties Analysis January 2, 2414 Page 2 Wetlands. Of the 67 lots, 21 lots include portions of wetland easements. Wetland easements on the individual lots constitute approximately 11 acres in total (See Exhibit D). However, there are also numerous small wetlands throughout the properties that are not protected via dedicated easements (See Exhibit C). Absent an actual delineation, these would appear to constitute an additional 2 acres, so that the dry buildable area in total is (163-11-2) about 150 acres, for an average dry buildable lot area of around 2.2 acres. Private Roads. The 1.5 miles (7900 linear feet) of private roads yields a road length of about 120 feet per homesite (79 00 / 67 = 120) with the average lot having about 240 feet of private road frontage. All except Countryside Drive are platted as cul-de-sacs with no segment platted for future extension to other roads or properties. However, Countryside Drive East and West were platted with a connecting corridor to allow the possibility of that becoming a future through road. It has been City policy to plat such corridors for future use where it makes sense - and the City's policy has been that if at some future date the neighborhood convinces the City to take over their private roads (which the City has strongly resisted to date) the City would require the road connections be paved and opened for use. Rural Character. The Dickey and Thompson properties were mostly open farmland prior to development, while the Coffin property was a mix of farmland and woods. There was a significant level of concern from Orono residents initially when the Dickey property was developed, as the 90 acres of open fields were not only very visible from surrounding roads but were located at the intersection of two major crossroads in the heart of rural Orono. The fear was that the rural character would be lost. Two -acre lots were then and since then have continued to be the typical development pattern in Orono's rural area. Only a very few rural -density developments have used clustering as a tool for preserving large areas of open space. In the Dickey/Thompson/Coffm properties there are no large areas protected from development; every two acres has a house on it. Years after the Dickey property was developed, perimeter tree buffers have naturally grown along stretches of Willow Drive, Watertown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road, and trees planted within individual lot by property owners have also helped to soften the view of what initially might have been described as "big houses scattered throughout a cornfield". Private Trails. Development approval of the Dickey and Coffin properties did include the developer's plan for a small number of interior trails to provide connectivity between the private roads and to Seven Nations Park. Per Exhibit E, these trails were intended to be maintained in a relatively natural state, and were intended to serve the residents in the subdivision (with the exception of the paved public trail developed by the City along the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road). The actual level of use and maintenance of these interior trails is unknown to staff. We do not have direct contact with whatever homeowners association exists; we assume there is at least an informal association that deals with the obligation of private road maintenance. Other Amenities. In keeping with the philosophy that each two -acre lot provides its own substantial recreation area, the City did not require a substantial dedication of parkland from these subdivisions. The 3 -acre Seven Nations Park parcel was intended to a great extent as preservation of a native American cultural site rather than as a `pocket park' to serve the Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Properties Analysis January 2, 2014 Page 3 neighborhood, although it does serve a dual purpose in providing open space. No other park land was dedicated; but the City did collect in excess of $165,000 in Park Fees for the combined developments. In terms of preservation of open space, it seems fairly clear that the only open space that was `officially' preserved (i.e. via easements or other dedication or covenant) was in the wetland areas. Unofficially, the area not built upon within each two -acre lot might qualify as open space, but it is not protected, not available to the public, and not in a large contiguous tract. While the City does not require that an owner's entire two acres be mowed, many owners within these subdivisions do mow virtually from lot line to lot line, while others maintain only 114 to 113 of their property in lawn. It should be noted that the DNR owns an 18 -acre tract of woods and wetland along the Luce Line trail just east of the Thompson property. This acreage provides a neighborhood amenity in terms of open space preservation, wildlife habitat, etc. Impact of Accessory Structures. Accessory structures such as pools and sport courts also tend to reduce the visual openness of the subdivision. A cursory review of the aerial photos indicates approximately 20 homes have pools, some with associated small accessory buildings and patios, and at least 8 have sport courts or tennis courts. Most do not have outlying separate sheds or storage buildings; if they have such buildings they are kept near the main residence structure. What might we do differently if we had it to do over? The two primary changes in applicable development codes since this area was developed could have impacts on how this would be developed today: 1) There have been a variety of changes in City and MCWD codes regarding wetland preservation since most of this area was developed. The introduction of wetland buffers might impact the development layout slightly if proposed today. 2) Site planning via the Conservation Design process might today result in a different lot layout to better preserve long views, contiguous open spaces and significant wooded areas. For the most part, other zoning code and development standards remain much the same as they were in the 1990s. Lot sizes of 2+ acres have to date have been sufficient to support use of septic systems and wells. The private road system has not become a burden on the City. Individual homeowners have done substantial plantings so that this neighborhood no longer resembles large homes in an otherwise barren landscape. It can be argued that for the Dickey property the same number of homes could have been clustered in much smaller lots at the northeast corner of the site near the Hackberry neighborhood, thus allowing for preservation of as much as half or two-thirds of the property in contiguous open space. This would have required municipal sewer, as well as a comfort level on the part of the Council and public that the remainder could (and would) be protected from development on a permanent basis. At the time, such a concept was not proposed by the developers and likely would not have been acceptable to the City. It would have been a departure from the City's philosophy as to how the rural area should be developed. Item #01 - Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 WEAR CIR r�Krst�tz�� Q), I ai I� v WATERTt�WN RQ Legend Ra€Iroad City Limits WATER TOWN RD [] Parcels (10-1-2013) Lakes & Ponds Thoroughbred La - -'--�--_} - Exhibit A Area Map Dickey Devin La o lk. m x C1 Countryside lir LU Sornerset_La tr n. �' `� o� .0 1 on view Cir Coffin v ❑ f ` O / Thompson p � DN P, Ruri Tr n WdoaY U>� AbinJ,.r gee, �Ge�i���'� i U LUCE LINE TR Dickey properties: 90 acres; 37 homes Thompson properties: 20 acres; 8 homes Coffin properties: 65 acres; 22 homes e�Va Totals: 175 acres; 67 homes Disclaimer,, This drawing is neither a iegal4' recorded map nor a survey and isnot Intended to he used as one. This 0 346 Feet drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located In wrleus city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and Is to be used for reference purpose only. The city of Orono is not © BoEton & Men k, Inc - Web GIS 12/13/2013 3:23 PM recpanslble for any lnaccuraclss herein contained. JL' 71 C 1 IE t7 a �=•�«srr��m�n� max a E�,'���„�. f i � Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 WEAR I ,( J - - page. 9W ------------ i IT 1 QI Legend _....__._._._._....- _... WATERTOWN RD WATERTOWN RDcc L Railroad City Limits Parcels (10-1-2013) J, Wetlands Preserve - 50' i( Jam— JJ Manage 1 - 35' Thoroure ghbd La El Manage 2.25' Manage 3 -18.5' (,✓� Unclassified Lakes & Ponds ✓�� �� / Devin La Exhibit C J Mapped Wetlands 4 U L, 5orrterset_La Y_ - $tide.D t� Countryside Dr —.. _.� ;�. •� � � ~`,, �`'`-.` - Longview Cir - �� Q .. /'_ I pbing�O� way-- L4N '—=LUCE LINE TR �..� _...._._ , (D S�+ ,J \ `� -•�_ blsclaimen. This drawing is legally neither a recorded map nor a survey and Is not Intended to be used as one. This - D 346 Feet drawing Is a compilation of records, informatlon, and data located In various city, county, and stare offices,and atherseurces aRecting the area Shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Drone is not 0 Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web G15 12/13/2013 3:27 PM responsible for any Inaccuracles hereln rontalned, ��!-L. lir '4' -_`: _ i� R rry� /-Ai rnY �_ r_ , � I ,�. , ... ... ... L01106,1141 n,?"AY1/-IAn)�j/'i rl hl �r41/x' I_rf=jr`1_!!f'L r !L -/-I I1 VJ YJ„ l�L r- {lJ4L,'+, i1_,I 1 I,-3Item #01 -Special Council et I.A •c -hr Iri ,Q I ,y° ; .m589°09'26"E 260Oo in/A I -E r'F•I File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 9 Y„R,'A rifir� n. a rrr,n E3y, / rWATERTOWN ROADn vo,-i,L_ �v^, � R✓r'lD � V'J 7 C=Fz! �'v'4 ,v m r� �,r,e. 5^ �, m \ F{" h .-. MOP 589° 'z5"E leo. ... 509°69"z5 bb - 895.00 - - - - - - 220.00 �. _'1 ` .- ._._..._. �6G:52 - ._ ..._ - _ - r - ..._ ..� -275• - ° I '. _... l7650 258,06- 3.M� 2a3,Q - 90 L I 8 I II I LP Y �7 514 41 o I!1 !I NI �1 I jtr A !m `1 ti J O� Ir , �i i /''I - I I} Z1rIfIN I 7 '2 1111 $i I R L OC K I ,� I B i I L 01f Lir } I 5 1'¢p�vl a°la°le'r5" I r r- r" I � �f i ti i � �"^ 1 `� r .iC� �i I I"'rrfi• I �n,J c•ar q 14gg6�� - 4 2aa34 I L_ ea99' +1 ppa 997°as'w 273.r2 ua - �--_�--��7.0� ee2°�,101. IV O� kym� A (, 1�•. '° , N>°f5`W 323.92 le.Qa°p:2fA t + g7'A:250. 5B7°45'E 274.89 +g \ Wesf -. � � � e„ .r'm, J• 3! .3r © I - I� •' �\1 I -[� n 4 \S4To53 ! aRq5°.Gb + 583°45'w OU e e° sB6°r5� 323.32ia2a° R:°PpO�8945 o. I k dB.32 s -175.T3 I u83°a5'b c�1s !07.13 -I (, .s \ '16j// % a° C :`3b air0'�.J:a °R' coj.1 i.99 I E.' IR.25 .a0 7 v b >y z \r 13ji w 1 / a az a .� b8.9� IY I I I I t .U) /�/nY try 2!I I I m I I / y N l- II'C K II II L -r --�� az. N B "II " ! I C 1 I ��za! kk I__ w A. I3- .:, a.�, k I I 4 zrsq; .~2 �_ - ��- _-6� �Jl_ 5�- �JL_ -L, 6.00 24 !Ig )�r.!`h1 L2�rsr III of rl III, ull�11�r1b %- 77 D I I! Z w 2 II I 7.I 2 ! Q I- & I {�7Lij m r� j`;. 145.0° ^_. ry , 4 mIl rJ i^I I 6 2�11I - �� - �'q� 'V V 'c6 tiI I �I I I ,' I °� �h� ' 01 12 cr. i I 1� ?l V II II i.h fly �� �h��h i.+r�ll'Ij' II j w :• it i. I r_, ~" l 11I I I IZD 57 31 c IJi tn�N \ I I I } I Id,d°3e'�^tet L� �6 ao"y6j fh �r+ ¢Z. (ria - J .L Zo4.30 J I za431 I = 0 52Cy I Wiz° si _ rrBB°u o5"ri 1e9:9g X68 yd ti° n S Sa , r 1 1 1 J a \ I I p°I L°66�-g _� !' ' a .� / Lu �} d{ilrl•° to II Ilbrr 52. �" a �" `'\\ II 3?s I',;zs'S5"y:;✓x754 �C \ r• 4.153.4..-.- - SIDE DRIVE_ Sd9'S1'�0" �... �I �533.CO�NTRY ! s � ? e� 3•% 309 I ,1 �& l a2°z I hi'1' 02• ,e' {� Y d� �d9�Jle'�r, 'r••. r _B r � Q N - -� y � / �� Sa I' =✓ 153.?r + � b8 3° 'S 202' '� �>2�A•aQ I °ti %3G.9/ v' I � � �.` ' -^ � � ✓ d° 'A � � ^ 210.dd ' J vJ c , / ' '� �r ''/>r3 W le-i3°A:25a0°�143• 1+ �V5'°y'h' I' y 'Y6 �9 Q -- ,+� 5idy �� Q �. I I e k s76tj ° /i DRIVE 26z.o9� {�i \&�y ','`• 1` a 4/�h e-54"_ e5.3oE: e:39° R_3QQ.oQ L5'� 11 I I y' �oti� 17 is �i �1� 't�'a�y h .: e:3s°°433 Jo I !e 1 �,/,.•, �� �� - 1 5 40 1 -' (� �$ � �/tide s � �, '� I•;a 3a°3o- �,ia9, \`\� f4 �1�� �o � e' � I 1 "I - � N � 9.1 s63e i3 II D�,.__. �?__. I I \yM-_-__.. -1 `gip 114e - __. -� _2 __ ` +t.`?q `S`B r9 ��I \\\ (,�� I'' 'n �'j..pQ ��iaZ .d0._.,.... =--11 __ ,SBI �--- --- ll� `,4 I, .,..9C' Fd \ ao /� � � � \ \ a' I h •e' V I I �� r � I - 4J 9�� •1� `m S \ \ vi -,Q. V r1,rL� I II _II+�n CLI . s II r 3 �. �.�°r...�er��� Fj \\� � ~..,� � �� 4'� �I IAh 4 �u I I+n � �I tl^I IZ ! k2T� tI^$I �, 2 3 �h"I \ t>) e+ ! ! ss;Y �eh"^C���h/ 10. 22 I I M i QK _'T �• ' /mss ,1, ' I tjD •,, ir� -- '��', �� d�rr,.�og 50ra/av�Ce I 2cz.o7 N7° N59°Or'W 0 [f69.79,e / _ 619.2! Ia dier.o7- 33 9 _ I I 156.64 ZQg.�% \. ° �\ �`Y'Q. `�✓ I I I I to ,�4 DraiAa,ge f45emen�' o �"� 21d.d 11� ` - f,TM _-------------- ------ I _ �� '4 ! I Wast 1hn of Lot 1, - �. LokLO 2! 2bd.Od !.-�_,, '.... , .... Aud. sub. Na. 229 'i ♦ f NB 1 Wri i tj h s` I f ' h ¢hr 17orlh line °i to f 1, Avd;Yors 5uddivi5ion Number 279 to N 89-01105.1 W �t I r`: •" I t,r r w dy 71 ,A We �^ V ryc'Fa s" M :y0 k,0° � EAST 200 °8 � � Exhibit D-1 ... r l.. r <Ts� i Depictions of Platted Easements r r .. q �. -68 R-250.°04. `C/ r ♦f '40\ B9 •.. ° L`2 `'` C�a• 4 Dickey WEST, r A' .,, 1 } m l E awn v.111.1 with and 1070 _ 1 `8'200.5 '♦,y4, , X62 71....1, 5° $� 1 I f - 1 0 4NIS. c • fig• c q5°� ., ee o ler! o. maasufed al rght a�gMe f3i e \ �' Lig' 37' J N ='" �, ' 1p f0, lha Wae line of Lot I, Aud. Sug. No. +.....) r�:k^: f.:l; j �9 �. �''Cr.k •'soa"h ^ r _ �5`;� 'f'si - -__ wJ. G.i.... I � 1,3� - 5�-n� d=9p•� L`T'A. ,; ���\'`�i3�Q' M1Z7�87�- � __ _ �- 152.19 1 nl h ;�' o• F r _ _ � ✓ q\ =' $ , `_` � Item #01 -Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] ,.G47�sa65=1� `O egg � )z O6 /C, 0 m Bz,loBs•6�q'+f7Ms� bs'.4a .00pS f ay.'s a- o �:� 0 Q U) �I I` h IM `;� d� 1! c s -o X N .LU 0 0 e � �n - y-4� ..,....... o `yoryh, �I r.� - - - d£'659 ? :.00.00.00 S ,.... 'E 34'1.85 0�4 n I .... Cti�6ascz ; ' GO '06 ��> a �` � �\ SpP 61 �: � I { I . � a✓` �? I}a �. '�,f o�jr �....;:r.�}• f � �!I {a e,- 421-51.,:.y. ` E, r � n�`: ,� 9Y I' IS w i nplj1' ti ' 1f f �h X si lfi I��7 tr I � � � 1y I :. i ...✓� �y�� ' % r g^$ryr r ��.• 4 � r l 4[s r 'P pV�55-9 zy�r� .y6°j h` �r may I'7. '`� ,�41r e t � � \ 1 0 r VJ / v v I S 4f. •%� ± r ti !. • �/ til' to IT 8i I Ktl' 4 / v y%70 / �2M ,��"pp /% `1V ��.'..,. x J i, as\ �� m ` ,1, ±a•` f70 COU o 0 V F} 1 N ry2 v6=7G"IYj' �� �� � � p �M ` d� a: Bbf5 h S \ °, I s� 1 t nay /•� /ry'^CD � I......,y- NII S h \7 u} 1............' \3 ' �6 tPSeflt LbN .: c;.,,. - \ •� Q / �. I •o `3 0r °��4r, - - - - - - N 07.12' W" W 435,75 __ _'.,! �:""'"�oo'°e+—Yt��sc� '� •�.,,11;.,r.....-�ir�< // $r�\ I Ii yrs: ��9�� oe�a _ II 2 n a CIO J E FS' ;i° '• I s' .w':.�.- L - - I fy fv [i �j '✓_� �7 r+. u ✓ Ss i :i `9 '49f M :,00,00.00 IN ...... ,.,........ 1 ; F...I y,fi .Ti I 7 %; sI 7--r----------'------j--,�.,.--1.- f �' ...1 I I ?\ !,:1 11 I::i Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] J61 -r71� / _r.J rJ`W _/ W LJ �^ (J /:J f•.�! is V ij I Vl = �] /� fJ i f j '� i�3 / ! ' [� �7 1-I 1 1! "t3 1 -J t /y ^�w T •'V � Oh'1L£ W-13 7...:.:"" 96'999 W-9 96'IDE i "0"15 mf to c) I ~ srI o L ^ y_ I -- -- a 8!'9oz kfnO'LU Ct (U d a �� CY o>sea G1 os wt S 8 qua 4k .a6aoro. � a J10.6F —I ¢o`+ �_ ., .•t Zg00.`wD CL `U CL tr_ N � - `{'I � to $1�4, �(� ° h ` � �' _'i•1fs I � 14 -�� � � . y ..C� U C I Zr y< C� y IIor W L U ze to th h [6'982 0 2Bg00 �o\.I,a c obs �` Gigp.D� n .•ti}. I� N = }�a� ^ ` I f o $'� j1� I° ALO i SOD vNI I l _ 3 MIs! I� 0 C, --- fr --=-- 0009v —On �—hd `y >;J 1 yew r; 1 ^, 1 �'s ;` � 3 L r, 9 � h• .�vq ,8v rha a PO <.';~%� W �,11`� JJ vfSt�L I. yp� ~n�" 1"� �� 8:gh3 X99 o f� N 1 % ,OF'.SLaO �• \" yp6, V' 7 I . ° y^l�b/ �m , Aqz, 77'99Z ij{nos L—�_---_— Tel. $\If so• _ I. „I ISO y _ �,.,�. ,�.� [�77 /n� !� 00'053,0E°LBIv�, ,a gy°fi2'E f5fi� /.y��-x.\7 r _ - O `Ni 1 V -11 1 1 o 'g �o. �\ mss. �� ~ amQ.: '` 386:93 { r ~•� I Q ,L Pi - _ `y y� vl 'L6�� 111 I A7;1 f I� I I Q I— 9o'L9Z� q¢ -S 99'0810 s '96n � ---- ------.-¢�---.� I\ � _� 4 SE. •`� .: �:. .... o'•. i'ml� o. 4•lO ��S 1.LN n p .v �f �. p�Ad _� Cis C. :.l l�V •�/5 C� I C14 9.0 A7 uj 9 11 I oo'69g J 1 + 1/O! daax 51 f ... A r�� r r / 7 �71-J .7 `Lll/-7 A/1-//�� � __,ems _�. ! y 4 r U Vrm`_ s9'sEs 3„0 81,vN Item,#01--Specigl Council Meeting? 01/004__, File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] rd I,�l)11. `':a1.. C)l..C:)+ I C'fY`:"1".i1I. i:'1, ROAID L_EE---- ------ "-�--_._._--- ��s m 40 1�6.•�N QD• .fi I iSi „ "'r ., ! ,_J ._ ... • Cr t 7Souf✓f - 971. 642.6fi Y� vi1L r �i.1Cr S f Ne90.Cc .p0 S 453.63 I 00 S S sr \ '��j59"w x SII •': lot -6 ti � r ''� yy, � y.• Imo, Saulll 14a.aa _ �� i I___ -______I_ _ ------ srset s QQ:zt.1QN .,r3'' °�,� �';�c;r �`��.`�b, I I ��\4� �} ' LOJ ;i% s y I �ve.ze=J <�Ona? - ktik�% GI ee:v Do Ir, :�, � LCQ a�i�E I u; ,`,'{t ,` V'ti o;�r �• _ � � "$I +'' � - S. -�� a �-'�b / � - S = rr SO I `w l;\ I °tri >rrs£ �y lli6dTR 98� 3r Do', 0mj w /� ,•'� �: ,"'` ,,�1,� . ?syW � I'$I H 3�. g! �, �" � — — _ =s3�W a.3zie _ ..$J ?y h`y'n,\ _Jj r i'Fiy ?•R'r! — , ,-?�•T3.� I. Q ii ' ; 9a7 i✓ 3!°66 ..1- 1=° 117„; W 4EN. 11 s I 8 6) L S _ N ��� ,,�!} �'lrr (,� � _ ;y b -I �w �.•. 1 �ryl��— � — �izv �oEs -. m w 4+ 3 -LM 284.84 41It 977 5 .. - 7'30 -1 23840 I _.. I_ 7584& r -r -t Al y.. 8Z.,-4 f�Z 4_ �_ ti.�>o _ —_— �.`-4 _... Y.pA`by yA 5 QO.00 00 E o o ...689.52 I r y 5B'1 b I§`.' So H _ � 1 � -: 1 fti � -935• p q ' -�{ �•. �� m�4 I ti� s'� `I w I° CD AA . fio x a5ez�'s"w L �h B`.54 50 5712! m 0 n ` /ao 9D'35 ! �`r �`r `t, r. Chzxo:17 ' 4 d �0/�1. ZI L 323.'59'°° Sax /Yatfi — (D R ti.:.. - - -- +. ,� 1 w % �N - �7 .' ✓�' .a/ °,.584 la _-;, �n ._�y,� �_ 3/¢03 �•, Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] h 0 i C; � j o ,, I L � � yQ95,12 �9854e'gp•� � ' / e %Ia k j al C1 t� u yls. 3 I0 l�' �;, i h 1 % �lyl �V• �m � . o earo ,..-�4 I 7 11 10 �I E6 r• f 9 �i1 ui `° 51� I I d•�p5 w , 1 111 A 4 �I�.� Ab1b�1'206,17 Neei fl4Lb 8 f"T � ,- ,. - 189 � 5e}w •i9: -'M I Nest , lAOW a r 11 � � •. e 11'9� A � 9p •.-r �.� j. S;xU r • w i a Al po' t • I /t 51 5 r l95 I "3 i'C i 2 5 - yr o " I W3,L,3 aha h, "t Te9_61— 1 I.se- ` ,ve9gs•w .,mel .. Exhibit D-3 Depictions of Platted Easements Coffin Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] w' C)LDI 1=d i CRYSTAL BA) Ssyl .. all COAD j . II ADDITION -._.-:—_----`. - - 6au1 sll.gp' L. PAY ROADe�S at.cli c-.tSs7.a,1- B;r)N 7 61 'oT ti wNh maa w+s a3: ..•',11 ...$ 1 si 6^ �° �� } 66 - ! M J °,d� i _ J '^i�• P a4w\�$. �I 411Vq� r� __arw_t=y =sem till ''. `.��� -� r �. /d q \ �<>«s ly',U'�'ly�°� J I' •1?ak d'..�.. I V y" E� w, �y� s�� I � i �. RIL LA N ,�. i in is � L �,� °'' �_1. •, ze I V�ys,� 1 g,a �P � 1 m §r• '"0�'="'- �.I 11 r W 8w xre¢'�„' �'4v •U ,rw z+aez �"�� w•a _.,I z r":r `__'�•'�_-°.sire—Y III q `�a G Ilmh n: (r1 N �++ i p 1 i ,�G e 1 — r I \� - — som9ra' 1a m _ � I 5 .r , "ue3rE In .51,0. r R /U tat � 5 �—�Jlr ` 6• � ^�,, .. I --� s,-3 I 1 �oay �. L iia i _ _ r� I ��� K El INO ��E'+..I t ID fir. �fJ 3o,ai — - c� ��Sna a rill ..LQ;//s age N rv�� --rra --_—� �V ! in f n"r1���\ `�wK � ill . 41 $ 1 u. - 3 L_-0Nz"c `.�`' - i aX•C ytll ,. � `� ,'�f�,'�b� r V - R 3�pQ ctF.—==_�` e.5.iz --" '."�„�i,� --, l•H - I $ � �L-2`tel z to �� Na•35'5!" -- d 1d5 - r frp,> a R 2a/7 L��.�— 5,W a At �. � ,� r �a� T -- 1�v J it gabs! '�N me _�— � No•is'Srw --- r�� s = .mss , y'; I o r U.dh _j LE laom m K a s Noys1'w ;� —_—No as Si^w — ISS s rn y L7 zrs�O J I ',-5 12, p I S \ I a I ! 6s �- �50'IFf4"W BIQ19 o12NE g Q s�wlLLow I, - /;e.trsv n;:e- , �Hnc N WIL.LSM NOM'W ❑n?NE ---JWL NP•3 &sf!/Az ofldz NfYtellh N'E/f afSrcl�on},T•II;RZf� G I I s r, ,1. 5 IEW CD rt to TANDEM - PROPERTIES BROKERS -PLANNERS -DEVELOPERS Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] �� �iSG� sS1Ui� James L. Ostenson S'Erg�; f• 2— ANN ATTAcKeD bo kW)N6$ Richard A. Putnam Exhibit E To: City of Orono Interior Trails Background Mayor and City Council Planning Commission Members From:Tandem Properties and Peter Andrea Company Dick Putnam, Jim Ostenson and Jim Deanovic Date:January 13, 1994 Subject: #1877 Coffin/Dickey Properties Proposed Subdivision Background Tandem Properties and Peter Andrea Co. (Tandem) has entered into a purchase agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Coffin for their 62 +- acre parcel and with Mr. and Mrs. Dickey for their 68+- acre parcel. Tandem began site planning in Sept/Oct of 1993 in order to submit a sketch plan for city review in Oct/Nov 1993. Tandem has prepared plans based upon numerous meetings with the city staff, adjacent owners, government agencies and technical experts. The City Parks & Planning Commissions reviewed the preliminary sketch plans mid visited the sites in order to give us suggestions on preparation of the final plans. The City Council also reviewed the sketch plan and the wetland classification issues as they affect the city's ordinances. The Council provided us with direction for final plan submission. Tandem has discussed the traditional Native American historic site with many governmental agencies, city staff and commissions and Mrs. Pat Dickey. The final determination of the historic site's status is not completed at this time. We will review its status later in this memo. Issues The project proposes 2 acre or larger single family lots, a city park and trails plus public streets. It is our belief that these plans are consistent with Orono's Comprehensive Plan. 2765 Casco Point Road • Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Office & Fax (612) 471-0573 7808 Creckridge Circle • Suite 310 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55439 Office (612) 941-7805 • Fax (612) 941-7853 Item #01- Special Council Meeting - 01106114 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] Tandem is aware of the proposed Highway 12 Corridor Study and the designation of a portion of the Dickey parcel as a potential corridor. We have discussed this with the City of Orono staff and officials, MNDOT representatives and representatives of the community. It is our judgment that a selection of this site as a future Highway 12 alignment is unlikely. Park Issues Our proposal incorporates park isues recommended by the Orono Park Commission: 1) The preservation of the traditional Native American sacred site west of the Dickey home south of Watertown Road. The plan proposes a 3 acre public park site. The Park Commission believes it should be a public park if it is established by authorities that the site is a sacred site. 2) Tandem proposes the city and/or private groups should have the opportunity to evaluate the buildings on the park site and the city should decide if they are suitable for preservation. 3) Tandem will dedicate an easement along the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road sufficient to construct a bike/hike trail to the city's standards.. The trail will use existing road right of way and addition- al easements to work with the existing trees and future septic sites for lots 1, 2, 3 Block 1 of the Dickey parcel. Tandem will dedicate and construct the trail with acreage credit and trail construction costs credited against the city park fees due on the Coffin/Dickey sites. 4) The trail connections from outlot A (proposed park) on the Dickey site to the two streets within the drainage utility easments between lots 13 & 14, block 2 and lots 2 & 3 block 1. Also the easements between lots S & G and the rear lot line of lot G block 1 connecting to the DNR woods shall be homeowners association responsibility and not credited to the public park requirement. The private trail easement on the Coffin site between lots 13 & 14, thru lot 8 adjacent to wetland and between lots 3 & 4 will be the responsibility of the homeowners association. 0 tial Council Meeting - 01/06/J4 Wil #f13- 1 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] ! n CA V ` ., �'• M_ i 14 of F` �177/II. 1 ' il-------�.... ----—9t=6-r-ERMSIAL -0--- 4 M \ taou+ VIE A'� imtlr Wq 46 _• �cuIaw Esttr�s r n Ij W � 'u• I � , �., 4��"C 1 ..,�^ � � 1. � s, � H40fffARY >t es at . a w T u w .ntow - ..�, y .. .1n r,,. • £ ; - 'S * r1 e {' I ` tl "S A S'�� . M ;t! �" ttyl W 1 ,. �* v dn rM 4L I l ) ` .� •, Og,. 1 rri 1 - �� �- Nl IWTQ1 011` Item #01- Special Council M ting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [To l Pages 99] . CRYSTAL.. .. .. ... 4AY. ,ROAD 1 =771- 1 4 • M• r� O T O C M Q. aZ� Oro m y °c M w x � 1 M t r m 0 v � Z;i7y 0oMx M oPO0 s v V -j Q Z qi 2 'a r —4w �t _ I S 'OYDk! 37ATd89 H1fiP&+c. C'""r©�— ° m� Zr?- 0 rz ZACm0 M O;•� N � ppm ro "'O-< °OMZ mp�= �• lii�t. ,msm0�o 0 fj � r> Item #01- Special Council M ting - 01/06/14 File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [To l Pages 99] . CRYSTAL.. .. .. ... 4AY. ,ROAD 1 =771- 1 4 • M• r� O T O C M Q. aZ� Oro m y °c M w x � 1 M t r m 0 v � Z;i7y 0oMx M oPO0 s v V -j Q Z qi 2 'a r —4w �t _ I S 'OYDk! 37ATd89 H1fiP&+c. C'""r©�— reeiri 40 1- SRrzata Council eeting - IJlTiiTI wATERTOWN aoao File #13-3638 & 13-3639 [Total Pages 99] jp Irv- Lo 1';' . xsn E 'Oo my m �- ` t •1-• � W 15 -1, � 1 cr • _ ,ter ,: pM5 Z= Z�M� b (nolo a s � Z 9 444 o 0 0 O ! 0 , ❑ 'T1 i r L Cf a z {tea z = m = m N = -n r n o p 0