Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, December 11, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Truth in Taxation Public Hearing — 6:30 p.m. 1. 2018 Budget Hearing a. 2018 Budget Information b. Adopt Final 2017 Levy Collectible in 2018 c. Adopt Final 2018 General Fund Budget d. Adopt the 2018 Special Revenue Funds Budgets e. Adopt the 2018 Enterprise Funds Budgets Approval of Agenda 2. Consent Agenda — Consent agenda items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under this section of the agenda. Items on the Consent Agenda are reviewed in total by the City Council and may be approved through one motion with no further discussion by the Council. Any item may be removed by any Council Member, staff member or person from the public for separate consideration. The City Council may add agenda items to be considered as part of the Consent motion. If you wish to remove any item from the Consent Agenda, please state the item number and description of the item. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Consent Agenda 3. Council Meeting Minutes of November 27, 2017 4. Claims/Bills 5. Confirmation of 2018 Open Book Meeting — Date & Time Proposal 6. Approval of 2018 Liquor License Renewal 7. Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Agreement 8. #17-3981— Todd & Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, Variances — Resolution 9. #17-3986 — Travis DeJong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail, Conditional Use Permit — Resolution Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Public Works/City Engineer Report 10. 2018 Public Works Plan 11. Ron Steffenhagen Retirement Resolution Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, December 11, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Planning Department's Report (Planning Commission Representative - Bruce Lemke) 12. #17-3980 - Shawn Wischmeier, 540 Big Island - After -the -Fact - Resolution 13. #17-3988, #17-3989 and #17-3990 - Lake West Development LLC, o/b/o Rick & Barbara Lupient, (PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003) "Ivy Place" - Variances, Easement Vacation, and Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 14. Approval Temporary Site Plan for River Valley Sports Use of Tent for Sales Display Mayor/Council Report City Administrator's Report 15. Authorization of Disbursement of City Funds for Claims 16.2017 Interfund Loan and Transfers 17. 2018 Non -Union Compensation 18. Approve 2018 Fee Schedule 19. Resolution Opposing Change to the Administration of Hennepin County Sheriff's Crime Lab Without Consultation With Communities Affected by the Change City Attorney's Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2017 12-22-17 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 12-25-17 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 2018 01-01-18 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-02-18 - Parks Commission Meeting, Tuesday 6:30 p.m. 01-08-18 - City Council Meeting, Monday 7:00 p.m. 01-15-18 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-16-18 - Planning Commission Meeting, Tuesday 6:30 p.m. (Richard Crosby) 01-22-18 - Council Work Session, Monday 5:00 p.m. 01-22-18 - City Council Meeting, Monday 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 1 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: 2018 Budget Hearing Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Truth In Taxation Finance Director Section: Public Hearing 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve require 2018 General Fund Budget, Tax Levy, the 2018 Special Revenue Fund Budgets, and the 2018 Enterprise Fund Budgets. 2. Background. Prior to the adoption of the 2018 budget and tax levy, the City is required to hold a public hearing to allow public input on the budget and tax levy. By law, this hearing must occur between November 29' and December 20th. When the preliminary tax levy and budget was approved in September, the public hearing was set for December 11, 2017 at 6:30. This public hearing is the final step prior to adoption of the budget and tax levy. The budget process was begun by staff at the in May. Over the summer a draft budget was prepared and reviewed by the Council at work sessions in July and August. In September the preliminary budget and tax levy was publically presented at the meeting of September 11 and the adopted at the September 25 council meeting. Tax Lew The total tax levy required to fund the 2018 budget is $5,439,951. This is an increase of $234,721 or 4.51% over the 2017 levy. A portion of the increase to the levy ($130,000) is designated for funding the City's Pavement Management Plan to address the City's aging road infrastructure. The remaining increase of $104,721 is an increase to the General Fund operating levy. Even with the increase in the levy, the City's tax rate will decrease from 16.844% to 16.529%. Orono continues to have one of the lowest tax rates in both Hennepin County (ranking 42 of 45 cities), and the State of Minnesota. The tax levy is used to fund the general operations of the City (General Fund), pay the debt service on the City's outstanding bonds, and to fund the Pavement Management Fund. The breakdown of the 2017 levy is $711,000 for debt service, $383,000 for roads, and the remaining $4,345,951 is used in the General Fund. Tax Capacity Rate and the Impact of the Tax Levy on Property Owners The County Assessor provides an annual calculation of the City's tax capacity based on the annual property revaluation. As of 12/4/2017, the City's taxable market value is $2,879,524,978 with a tax capacity of $32,961,379. When compared to last year, taxable market value has increased by 5.44% and the tax capacity by 5.76%. As a result of the City's increased tax capacity, the tax capacity rate will decrease from 16.844% in 2017 to 16.529% in 2018. Using this tax rate and assuming no change in a property's value, the City's share of the property tax bill would be: a decrease of $7.41 (-1.87% on a home previously valued at $250,000; a decrease in tax of $15.75 (-1.87%) on a $500,000 home; a $1,000,000 home will see a decrease of $35.44 (-1.87%); and a $2,000,000 home has a decrease of $74.81 (0.48%). The actual tax impact on any particular property will depend on how the property's taxable value changed in relation to the rest of the City. Tables illustrating a 5% increase in value and a 5% decrease in value are included in the attached budget information. General Fund Budget General Fund Expenditures The 2018 expenditure budget is $8,193,401 which is an increase of $205,036 (2.57%) over the 2017 budget. Prepared By: RIC Reviewed By: 1b)X1 Approved By: �bV AGENDA ITEM The increase of $132,275 (3.12%) in the Police Department is primarily the result wage increases due to step/longevity increases and a 2.5% COLA increase in officer wages. Other notable increases are $27,034 (9.1 %) in Administration. This increase is mainly due to the hiring of a full time Administrator. Elections is increasing by $22,392 because 2018 is an election year. The Street Department is increasing $26,068 (5.22%) with the increase split between Personal Services and Supplies & Maintenance. The Parks budget is increasing $56,667 (48.65%) mainly due to the hiring the Golf Course/Parks Supervisor. Some department budgets are decreasing. The Planning Department is decreasing by $22,741 (2.98%). Some of the decrease is due to staffing changes, a majority of the decrease is due to the reduction of contracted services. The other significant decrease is in the Special Projects and Contingencies Department. The line item for contingencies ($40,990) has been removed from the budget. The General Fund Summary and Line Item expenditure budgets are included with this memo. General Fund Revenues The primary revenue source for the General Fund, accounting for 53.1% of the revenue budget, is the property tax levy. The 2018 General Fund tax levy is $4,355,050 which is $157,810 (3.8%) higher than the 2017 General Fund levy. Total General Fund revenues are budgeted to increase by $205,540 (2.6%) in 2018. Of the revenue amounts that are increasing, the largest is an increase of $25,330 for contracted police services. Overall revenues at the Golf Course are being increased by $26,000. Detailed General Fund revenue information is included in the exhibits. Since the preliminary budget was developed, the Park Commission has shown support for removing the Dog Park Permit revenue from the General Fund to the Lurton Park Fund. It is currently included in the General Fund revenue budget. This is a change that could be made in the 2018 budget, or during the budget process for the 2019 budget. Special Revenue Funds The special revenue funds that budgets are adopted for are the Park Fund, The Drug Forfeiture Fund, and the TIF Fund. Special revenue funds by definition have a primary source of revenue that is dedicated for a specific purpose. In the Park Fund the primary revenue source is park dedication fees collected from developers. By state law, these funds must be used for parkland acquisition and development. The Drug Forfeiture Fund receives its primary funding from the Police Department's drug and alcohol enforcement activities. The funds must be used for drug and alcohol related activities. The TIF Fund is used to account for revenues related to the Orono Woods Senior Housing Development. Debt Service Levies The 2018 levy for debt service is $711,000. This levy is used to pay the debt service on the City's outstanding bonds. Enterprise Funds The Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Recycling Funds are designed to account for the business type activities of the City. These funds do not receive any property tax revenue. As part of the 2017 fee schedule, the following rate increases are being recommended: Water 6%; Sewer 6%, Stormwater 10%. The fee schedule is also being approved tonight. It is the City's long-term goal to fully fund infrastructure improvements through utility rates and not use special assessments. Water Fund The water fund has historically been operating at a loss. Because depreciation is a non-cash expenditure, Prepared By: RIC Reviewed By: 1b)X1 Approved By: �bV AGENDA ITEM the fund has had a positive operating cash flow since 2009. In most years, the operating loss has been covered by the revenue received from antenna leases on the water towers. Due to consolidations in the cellular industry and changing technologies, the lease revenue is not guaranteed to continue indefinitely. For the last four years, water rates have been increased by 11 % annually. The 2018 budget is being presented with a 6% rate increase with future increases to be determined to be based on a utility rate study that is being performed in 2018. As presented, the operating budget for 2018 will break even. The expenditure budget is increasing by $25,310 (2.1%). $9,000 of the increase is in maintenance supplies and maintenance. As a result of recently completed water system improvements, the depreciation expense is also increasing by $10,000. The operating transfer of $55,000 is to the debt service fund supporting the Casco Point Bonds ($55,000). The non-operating interest expense is for the interest on the 2014 Water Bonds. The non-operating revenue of $100,000 has been removed from the Water Fund budget. The Water Fund's current cash balance is $977,699.82. Sewer Fund In recent years, the sewer fund has mostly operated at a loss. Non-operating revenues however, have consistently offset the operating losses. This has resulted in a positive operating cash flow for the fund. The 2018 budget is being presented with a rate increase of 6%. The single largest expense for the sewer fund is the Met Council disposal charges. The past two years have seen increases in the amounts of $37,410 (9.5%) and 41,277 (9.6%) respectively. As has been discussed with the Council during previous budget processes, heavy rains and high water tables increase the flow through the MCES lift stations and increase our disposal charges. The total operating expenditure budget is increasing by $78,881 (5.8%) The major increases are the previously mentioned MCES charges ($41,277), repairs and maintenance for sewer lines ($13,220) and the non-cash expense of depreciation ($15,000). The revenues are calculated with a 4% increase in the sewer rates as called for in the 2014 rate study. Future increases will be based on the 2018 rate study The operating transfer is to cover the sewer improvements that were part of the Casco Point project and will continue for another six years. Upcoming capital expenditures can be covered by the fund's current cash balances. Projects identified in the draft CIP for 2018 include: Annual sewer rehabilitation ($273,182), Sewer televising ($47,272), additional generators ($75,000), lift station updates ($112,000); lift station monitoring improvements ($26,000), sewer main replacements ($353,740), and a generator rehabilitation ($10,000), for a total of $972,194. The current cash balance for the fund is $2,800,000. Storm Water The Stormwater Fund is for the most part project based. Operating expenditures are mainly limited to engineering associated with NPDES, SWPPP and other state and federal requirements. Public Works time and materials spent on culvert cleaning/replacement are also charged to this fund. The purpose of this fund is to collect money for the larger Stormwater projects that will be required in the future. The revenue in the attached budget is calculated with a 10% increase in the rates. This is the annual increase required to avoid future special assessments for stormwater projects. Potential CIP projects in 2018 include: Long Lake Ravine Stabilization (SWMP 7); System improvements performed with road projects; TMDL Updates. The capital expenditures total $308,080. The funds current cash balance is $1,700,000. Recyctin� The recycling fund was newly created in 2013. Its major expenditure line is for contracted recycling charges. The current contract with Waste Management is capped at a 2.8% increase. In November of Prepared By: RIC Reviewed By: 1b)X1 Approved By: �bV AGENDA ITEM 2016 and continuing through 2017, the City has been receiving a Recycling Materials Offset. hi previous years, this offset had not been paid because there was no market for the recycled materials. With the return of the offset, the budget has been prepared with no increase in recycling rates. The full time wages that are charged to the fund represent 10% of the City Clerks wages. The current cash balance is $49,673. Cable The Cable fund was new for the 2015 budget. The projected revenues are based on current subscriber information and rates. The line item for Internet/Other communications covers the costs associated with streaming and online access of council meetings. It has been increased to pay for the increased cost of our fiber internet connection. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the attached budget resolutions setting the 2018 Property Tax Levy, the 2018 General Fund Budget, the 2018 Special Revenue Fund Budgets, and the 2018 Enterprise Fund Budgets. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motions to approve the 2018 Property Tax Levy, the 2018 General Fund Budget, the 2018 Special Revenue Fund Budgets, and the 2018 Enterprise Fund Budgets. Exhibits A. Resolution Adopting the 2018 Property Tax Levy B. Resolution Adopting the Final 2018 General Fund Budget C. Resolution Adopting the 2018 Special Revenue Fund Budgets D. Resolution Adopting the 2018 Enterprise Fund Budgets E. General Budget and Tax Information Prepared By: RIC Reviewed By: 1b)X1 Approved By: �bV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2018 PROPERTY TAX LEVY BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums be levied for the current year, collectible in 2018 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: General Fund - Operating $4,345,951 Pavement Management Levy 383,000 G.O Improvement Bond 2010 130,470 G.O. Improvement Bond 2014 174,000 G.O. Improvement Bond 2016 406,530 TOTAL ALL LEVIES5 439 951 The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 11, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE FINAL 2018 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the preliminary 2018 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows: ESTIMATED REVENUES Taxes - General $4,355,050 Licenses and Permits 466,650 Intergovernmental 240,220 Charges for Services 2,791,480 Fines and Forfeits 80,100 Interest Income 54,500 Recreation Fees 176,000 Miscellaneous 29,400 TOTAL 8 193 400 APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURES General Government $1,332,026 Public Safety 5,498,764 Street Maintenance 525,893 Parks and Recreation 345,967 Engineering - Unallocated 15,000 Reimbursable Expenditures 95,750 Special Projects and Contingency 0 Transfers to Other Funds 380,000 TOTAL SKIE1,400 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 11, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk P Dennis Walsch, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2018 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 2018 Special Revenue Fund budgets are determined to be as follows: Anpronriated Exvenditures General Government $ - - $ - - $ 72,000 Public Safety - - 20,000 - - Streets - - - - - - Parks & Recreation - - - - - - Transfers to Other Funds - - - - - - Increase to Fund Balance - - 6,000 - - Total Expenditures 386 090 26 000 72 000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 11, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Drug/Felony Estimated Revenues Park Forfeiture TIF Taxes — General $ - - $ - - 72,000 Interest Income 5,000 1,000 - - User Fees / Loan Payment - - 25,000 - - Park Dedication Fees 5,500 - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - - Transfers from other Funds - - - - - Use of Fund Balance - - - - - - Total Revenues 10 500 26 000 72 000 Anpronriated Exvenditures General Government $ - - $ - - $ 72,000 Public Safety - - 20,000 - - Streets - - - - - - Parks & Recreation - - - - - - Transfers to Other Funds - - - - - - Increase to Fund Balance - - 6,000 - - Total Expenditures 386 090 26 000 72 000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 11, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2018 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 2018 Enterprise Fund budgets are determined to be as follows: Estimated Revenues Water Sewer Recycling Stormwater Cable Charges for Service $ 641,300 $1,450,000 $ 107,600 $ 281,000 $ 77,000 Interest Income 10,000 35,000 -- 15,000 -- Non-Operating -- 20,000 35,000 -- 1,000 Total Revenues $142,600 270.600 77 000 Annronriated Expenditures Operating Expenses $ 634,938 $1,448,711 $130,150 $ 199,564 $61,515 Non -Operating Expenses Interest Expense 23,631 Debt Service 80,000 Transfer to Other Funds 55,000 110,000 -- -- -- Total Expenditures793 569 1 558 711 &11QI50 199,564 61 515 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 11, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono Budget Hearing Exhibit E General Tax and Budget Information Taxes Tax Levy Impact on Residential Properties......................................................................1 DebtService......................................................................................................................4 General Fund Summaries GeneralFund Revenue......................................................................................................6 General Fund Expenditure Summary — by Category........................................................9 General Fund Expenditure Summary — by Department..................................................10 General Fund Department Summary Budgets................................................................11 Enterprise Funds Summaries Enterprise Funds Summary Budgets...............................................................................28 Line Item Expenditure Detail Budgets GeneralFund...................................................................................................................35 EnterpriseFunds.............................................................................................................59 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R� Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase frorr Levy Impact Effect of 2018 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties No Change in Value Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes no change in value Page 1 Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Value $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 MVE $14,740 $14,740 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $235,260 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,0001 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,353 5,000 5,000 11,250 11,250 23,750 23,750 ate 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% $396.34 $388.93 $842.20 $826.45 $1,894.95 $1,859.51 $4,000.45 $3,925.64 2017 -$7.41 -$15.75 -$35.44 -$74.81 12017 -1.87% -1.87% -1.87% -1.87% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes no change in value Page 1 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R� Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase frorr Levy Impact Effect of 2018 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties 5.0% Decrease in Value Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% decrease in value Page 2 Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Value $250,000 $237,500 $500,000 $475,000 $1,000,000 $950,000 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 MVE $14,740 $15,865 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $221,635 $500,000 $475,000 $1,000,000 $950,0001 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,271 5,000 4,688 11,250 10,625 23,750 22,500 ite 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% $396.34 $375.37 $842.20 $774.80 $1,894.95 $1,756.21 $4,000.45 $3,719.03 2017 -$20.97 -$67.40 -$138.74 -$281.43 12017 -5.29% -8.00% -7.32% -7.03% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% decrease in value Page 2 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R� Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase frorr Levy Impact Effect of 2018 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties 5.0% Increase in Value Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% Increase in value Page 3 Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 Value $250,000 $262,500 $500,000 $525,000 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 MVE $14,740 $13,615 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $248,885 $500,000 $525,000 $1,000,000 $1,050,0001 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,489 5,000 5,313 11,250 11,875 23,750 25,000 ate 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% 16.844% 16.529% $396.34 $411.41 $842.20 $878.10 $1,894.95 $1,962.82 $4,000.45 $4,132.25 2017 $15.07 $35.90 $67.87 $131.80 12017 3.80% 4.26% 3.58% 3.29% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% Increase in value Page 3 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Debt Service Schedule Debt Issue 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2010 MSA, PMP, Refunding Tax Levy 133,460 130,470 132,725 134,825 131,520 133,325 134,530 130,000 MSA Funds 142,863 139,713 141,488 143,113 139,663 141,063 142,000 137,469 276,323 270,183 274,213 277,938 271,183 274,388 276,530 267,469 2014 Garage, Water, Refunding Tax Levy 428,700 174,000 165,300 162,900 166,700 161,000 282,000 277,000 Transfers - Contract Revenue 125,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 60,000 - - - Water Fund - Portion 100,180 103,630 102,030 100,430 102,180 1,013,830 100,430 98,570 653,880 402,630 367,330 363,330 328,880 1,174,830 382,430 375,570 2016 GO Refunding Bonds Tax levy 192,840 406,530 412,975 413,275 412,780 416,675 Transfer - Water 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Transfer - Sewer 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 357,840 571,530 577,975 578,275 577,780 581,675 Current Debt Service Sources 930,203 672,813 641,543 641,268 600,063 1,449,218 658,960 643,039 Total Levy Required 755,000 711,000 711,000 711,000 711,000 711,000 416,530 407,000 Total Transfers & Water Fund 390,180 393,630 367,030 365,430 327,180 1,178,830 100,430 98,570 Total MSA 142,863 139,713 141,488 143,113 139,663 141,063 142,000 137,469 Total 1,288,043 1,244,343 1,219,518 1,219,543 1,177,843 2,030,893 658,960 643,039 Page 4 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Debt Issue 2010 MSA, PMP, Refunding Tax Levy MSA Funds 2014 Garage, Water, Refunding Tax Levy Transfers - Contract Revenue Water Fund - Portion 2016 GO Refunding Bonds Tax levy Transfer - Water Transfer - Sewer Current Debt Service Sources 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 130,725 268,413 26,985 277,000 278,857 278,000 278,002 101,550 99,350 101,920 99,310 101,500 378,550 378,207 379,920 377,312 101,500 646,963 405,192 379,920 377,312 101,500 Total Levy Required 407,725 278,857 278,000 278,002 - Total Transfers & Water Fund 101,550 99,350 101,920 99,310 101,500 Total MSA 137,688 26,985 - - - Total 646,963 405,192 379,920 377,312 101,500 Debt Service Schedule Page 5 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Revenues Percentage 2016 Y-T-D 2017 2018 Increase Increase Revenue Source Actual Nov 30,2017 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Property Taxes 4,047,583 2,151,445 4,197,240 4,355,050 157,810 3.8% Total Licenses 17,500 17,042 13,900 13,900 - 0.0% Total Permits 466,981 563,844 451,750 452,750 1,000 0.2% Total Intergovernmental 248,270 252,972 227,220 240,220 13,000 5.7% Total Gen Govt Service Charges 485,871 521,097 399,500 379,500 (20,000) -5.0% Total Public Safety Service Charges 2,348,274 2,311,090 2,379,350 2,411,980 32,630 1.4% Total Fines and Forfeits 86,651 59,745 80,500 80,100 (400) -0.5% Total Investment Revenue 60,207 503 54,500 54,500 - 0.0% Total Miscellaneous Revenue 284,166 239,544 183,900 205,400 21,500 11.7% Total Revenue 8,045,501 6,117,281 7,987,860 8,193,400 205,540 2.6% Page 6 City of Orono 2018 Revenue Budget Summary Percentage 2016 Y -T -D 2017 2018 Increase Increase Revenue Source Actual Nov 30,2017 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Current Ad Valorem Taxes 3,977,693 2,130,743 4,197,240 4,345,050 Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 18,184 (14,523) - 10,000 Fiscal Disparities 34,805 15,807 - Personal Property Tax 14,899 17,429 Forfieted Tax Sale Apportionmt - - Rent Credit - - Penalties and Interest -Taxes 2,002 1,989 - - Property Taxes 4,047,583 2,151,445 4,197,244 4,355,050 157,806 3.8% Beer & Liquor Licenses 6,670 7,160 7,000 7,000 - 0.0% Cigarette Licenses 125 875 400 400 0.0% Garbage Haulers Licenses 1,080 1,110 1,100 1,100 0.0% Other Business License/Permit 8,357 6,902 5,400 5,400 0.0% Dog Licenses 1,268 995 - - N/A Total Licenses 17,500 17,042 13,900 13,900 0.0% Building Permits 362,045 459,056 375,000 371,000 (4,000) -1.1% Zoning Permit 4,929 950 1,750 1,750 - 0.0% Mechanical/Septic/Other 67,909 70,032 50,000 55,000 5,000 10.0% Plumbing Permit 32,098 33,805 25,000 25,000 - 0.0% Total Permits 466,981 563,844 451,750 452,750 1,000 0.2% Federal Grant -other - - - - - N/A Market Value Credit - - - - N/A Police State Aid 217,056 223,228 200,000 200,000 - 0.0% Police Training Reimbursement 8,442 9,220 10,000 23,000 13,000 130.0% PERA State Aid 7,219 3,610 7,220 7,220 - 0.0% State Grant -other 15,553 16,915 10,000 10,000 - 0.0% Total Intergovernmental 248,270 252,972 227,220 240,220 13,000 5.7% Administrative Charges for Svc 85,300 51,750 80,000 80,000 - 0.0% General Taxable Sales/Service (4,526) 817 1,000 1,000 0.0% Assessments searches 380 150 300 300 0.0% Plan Check/Site Exam Fees 215,943 291,722 190,000 190,000 0.0% Cond Use-Variance-Dev Fees 47,775 42,585 40,000 10,000 (30,000) -75.0% Engineering & Legal Fees 89,805 88,082 40,000 40,000 0.0% Bldg Permits -mail in fees 1,535 868 700 700 0.0% On-site Septic Program fees 44,550 44,738 44,500 44,500 0.0% Coop Agreement -public works 5,108 385 3,000 3,000 0.0% InterDepartmental Services -PW - - - - - N/A Off Leash Annual Pass 130 15,210 - 10,000 10,000 N/A Total Gen Govt Service Charges 485,871 521,097 399,500 379,500 (20,000) -5.0% Coop Agreement -inspection 27,128 12,476 15,000 20,000 5,000 33.3% Coop Agreement -police 2,234,099 2,199,446 2,283,500 2,308,830 25,330 1.1% Police Special Services 84,156 98,068 75,000 80,000 5,000 6.7% False Alarm Fees 1,425 500 4,500 2,000 (2,500) -55.6% Police Reports 1,115 600 850 850 - 0.0% Police Reserve Receipts 350 - 500 300 (200) -40.0% Total Public Safety Service Charges 2,348,274 2,311,090 2,379,350 2,411,980 32,630 1.4% Other Fines - - - - - N/A Court Fines 78,705 56,313 80,000 80,000 0.0% Drug Task Force - - - - - N/A Dog Impound Fees 60 60 500 100 (400) -80.0% Total Fines and Forfeits 78,765 56,373 80,500 80,100 (400) -0.5% Interest on investments 59,810 - 54,000 54,000 - 0.0% Interest -NOW account 396 503 500 500 0.0% Total Investment Revenue 60,207 503 54,500 54,500 0.0% Utility Penalties 1,540 1,750 1,500 1,500 - 0.0% Green Fees 108,275 126,061 90,000 110,000 20,000 22.2% Rental -Golf carts & Club 52,760 50,762 44,000 49,000 5,000 11.4% Beer Sales 7,616 9,896 7,000 8,000 1,000 14.3% Pop Sales 4,132 - - - - N/A Concessions -taxable 2,554 6,145 5,300 6,000 700 13.2% Golf Ball Sales 1,427 (11) - - - N/A Pro Shop -taxable 513 2,719 3,700 3,000 (700) -18.9% Pro Shop -nontaxable 1,093 303 - - - N/A Other Golf Course Receipts 9,864 698 N/A Cash Over/Short (51) - N/A Revenue Source Total Golf Course Receipts Miscellaneous Revenue Rent Income Contributions & donations Refunds & Reimbursements Sale of Equipment Filing fees-elections/plats Total Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenue City of Orono 2018 Revenue Budget Summary Percentage 2016 Y -T -D 2017 2018 Increase Increase Actual Nov 30,2017 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 188,181 196,572 150,000 176,000 26,000 17.3% 24,332 576 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% 5,850 4,500 5,400 5,400 0.0% 1,470 - - - N/A 6,699 3,958 - 500 500 N/A 43,584 29,738 20,000 15,000 (5,000) -25.0% 12,510 2,450 4,000 4,000 - 0.0% 284,166 239,544 183,900 205,400 21,500 11.7% City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Expenditures - Catagory City of Orono 2017 General Fund Budget Major Expenditure Categories Page 9 2018 Increase % 2016 2016 Y -T -D 2017 Preliminary (Decrease) Increase Budget Actual Aug 31,2017 Budget Budget 2015 to 2016 (Decrease) Personal Services 4,943,340 4,808,294 3,222,077 5,155,110 5,374,087 218,977 4.25% Supplies & Maintenance 582,780 526,260 375,441 618,804 637,130 18,326 2.96% Insurances 97,470 98,083 49,610 99,220 98,270 (950) -0.96% Professional Services 1,075,591 972,741 777,860 1,081,950 1,069,381 (12,569) -1.16% Other Expenses 392,889 391,928 241,387 402,590 420,633 18,043 4.48% Capital Outlay 202,000 171,290 150,501 204,000 200,000 (4,000) -1.96% Transfers to Other Funds 365,000 - 639 375,000 380,000 5,000 1.33% Contingencies 40,000 8,004 23,297 40,990 - (40,990) -100.00% Purchases for Resale 9,500 12,081 9,634 10,700 13,900 3,200 29.91% Total 7,708,570 6,988,681 4,850,447 7,988,364 8,193,401 205,036 2.57% Page 9 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Mayor & Council Administration Elections Assessing Finance Law/Legal Services Central Services Human Services Police Fire Protection Services Building & Zoning Engineering Street Maintenance Parks Golf Course Special Services Special Projects -Contingencies Transfers to Other Funds Total General Fund Expenditures General Fund - Department City of Orono 2018 General Fund Budget Departmental Budgets Page 10 2018 Dollar % 2016 2016 2017 Draft Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 83,240 83,440 85,150 85,165 15 0.02% 291,120 268,802 297,150 324,184 27,034 9.10% 18,130 18,725 3,160 25,552 22,392 708.61% 180,000 86,000 180,000 182,000 2,000 1.11% 322,320 315,955 323,670 331,926 8,256 2.55% 102,500 112,918 104,000 112,000 8,000 7.69% 244,470 268,437 265,900 258,800 (7,100) -2.67% 12,400 12,426 12,400 12,400 - 0.00% 4,076,850 3,837,514 4,236,760 4,369,035 132,275 3.12% 395,150 393,476 397,000 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% 707,050 693,366 762,470 739,729 (22,741) -2.98% 20,000 9,893 20,000 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% 493,830 475,551 499,825 525,893 26,068 5.22% 108,120 109,840 116,469 173,136 56,667 48.65% 152,640 170,346 172,670 172,831 161 0.09% 95,750 123,018 95,750 95,750 - 0.00% 40,000 8,004 40,990 - (40,990) -100.00% 365,000 - 375,000 380,000 5,000 1.33% 7,708,570 6,987,711 7,988,364 8,193,401 205,036 2.57% Page 10 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services City Wide Memberships Other Expenses City Council Total PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Mayor & Council 41110 2015 2016 2017 Budget Actual Budget 19,590 19,642 19,660 70,810 62,198 63,990 1,300 1,599 1,500 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase (Decrease) 0.03% 0.02% 0.00% 91,700 83,440 85,150 87,554 85,165 15 0.02% The City Council oversees the policies and procedures that govern the city in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for City Council Representatives. *City-wide Memberships are as follows: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District League of Minnesota Cities Metro Cities *Other Expenses includes training and meeting expenses Page 11 Dollar Y -T -D 2018 Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) 17,698 19,665 5 67,947 64,000 10 1,909 1,500 0 Increase (Decrease) 0.03% 0.02% 0.00% 91,700 83,440 85,150 87,554 85,165 15 0.02% The City Council oversees the policies and procedures that govern the city in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for City Council Representatives. *City-wide Memberships are as follows: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District League of Minnesota Cities Metro Cities *Other Expenses includes training and meeting expenses Page 11 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Administration 41300 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 261,260 253,171 278,850 284,090 305,884 27,034 9.69% Supplies & Maintenance 300 44 300 183 300 0 0.00% Professional Serivices 6,000 5,245 6,000 4,758 6,000 0 0.00% Other Expenses 13,000 12,223 12,000 3,010 12,000 0 0.00% Administration Total 280,560 270,683 297,150 292,041 324,184 27,034 9.10% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Administration Department includes the City Administrator who is responsible for meeting satatutory and legal obligations, implementing policy established by the City Council and ensuring the successful management of all city operations. In addition the City Administrator is responsible for overseeing the human resource function. The City Clerk and Administrative Staff are also included in the Administration Department and perform various function such as customer service, general administrative duties, permits and licensing, elections, data practices, and record management. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the City Administrator and Administration Staff. *Professional Services includes the city recorder for city council meetings. *Other Expenses includes training and development, memberships in professional organizations for the Administrative Staff, and the City Administrator's car allowance. Page 12 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Other Expenses 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Elections 41410 2015 2016 2017 Budget Actual Budget 0 12,414 1,160 2,000 4,044 2,000 400 2,266 0 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase Decrease 1378.62% 40.00% N/A Elections Total 2,400 18,725 3,160 0 25,552 22,392 708.61% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Elections Department administers all federal, state, county, and municipal elections held in the city. Temporary election judges are hired to provide the necessary staffing at polling locations, and for the operation of voting machines. The Administrative Staff provides supervision to the election judges as needed and maintains election records. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services are the wages for the temporary election judges. 2016 is an election year. *Other expenses include professional services, postage, travel expenses, advertising, building/equipment rental, training, meeting expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. Page 13 Dollar Y -T -D 2018 Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease 0 17,152 15,992 0 2,800 800 0 5,600 5,600 Increase Decrease 1378.62% 40.00% N/A Elections Total 2,400 18,725 3,160 0 25,552 22,392 708.61% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Elections Department administers all federal, state, county, and municipal elections held in the city. Temporary election judges are hired to provide the necessary staffing at polling locations, and for the operation of voting machines. The Administrative Staff provides supervision to the election judges as needed and maintains election records. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services are the wages for the temporary election judges. 2016 is an election year. *Other expenses include professional services, postage, travel expenses, advertising, building/equipment rental, training, meeting expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. Page 13 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Assessing 41550 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Assessing Contract 160,000 161,831 180,000 176,164 182,000 2,000 1.11% Assessing Total 160,000 161,831 180,000 176,164 182,000 2,000 1.11% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with Hennepin County to provide Assessing services. Page 14 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Professional Services Other Expenses 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Finance Department 41500 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase Decrease 1.36% N/A N/A 250.65% Finance Total 318,620 318,143 323,670 284,836 331,926 8,256 2.55% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES The Finance Department oversees the City's financial operations, insurances, and employee benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget document and annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Finance Department Staff. *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Finance Staff. Page 15 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease 317,140 314,695 322,130 284,231 326,526 4,396 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,480 3,448 1,540 605 5,400 3,860 Increase Decrease 1.36% N/A N/A 250.65% Finance Total 318,620 318,143 323,670 284,836 331,926 8,256 2.55% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES The Finance Department oversees the City's financial operations, insurances, and employee benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget document and annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Finance Department Staff. *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Finance Staff. Page 15 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Law/Legal Services 41600 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Professional Services 97,500 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% Law/Legal Services Total 97,500 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with two local legal firms to provide legal services. The Legal Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services includes the costs associated with the contract with legal staff, prosecution costs, code enforcement, and jail charges. Page 16 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Central Services 41900 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Supplies & Maintenance 79,200 90,681 96,200 112,253 93,000 (3,200) -3.33% Professional Services 35,000 46,501 38,000 38,438 38,000 0 0.00% Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 30,200 0 0.00% Other Expenses 94,650 101,054 101,500 98,308 97,600 (3,900) -3.84% Capital Outlay & Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Central Services Total 239,050 268,437 265,900 271,649 258,800 (7,100) -2.67% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Central Services Department provides for those operating expenses that encompass all city departments. By consolidating these expenditures, the City can more accurately determine the effectiveness of the costs and benefits provided. The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with an outside janitorial service for general cleaning and upkeep of city facilities. The Central Services Department also pays for a portion of the costs associated with the annual audit. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Supplies & Maintenance include the operating supplies and maintenance expenses on city equipment and facilities. *Other Expenses includes utilities, publishing costs, copier leases, and other miscellaneous charges related to city operations. *Insurance Expenses includes a portion of the City's general and liability insurance costs. *Professional Services includes annual audit expenses and fees associated with administering city benefit plans. Page 17 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Human Services 41800 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Contributions 12,400 12,426 12,400 11,099 12,400 0 0.00% Human Services Total 12,400 12,426 12,400 11,099 12,400 0 0.00% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Human Services Department is comprised of area organizations that provide equal opportunity in employment, housing, public services, and education. The City maintains an affiliation with these organizations to ensure a strong relationship with area communities and their citizens. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Contributions are the contributions made to Human Service Organizations in the Orono area. Organizations include: The Gillespie Center 9,500 Orono Community Education 2,900 12,400 Page 18 City of Orono - 2018 Budget 2018 General Fund Operating Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries Departmental Summary Police Department 42110 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 3,197,850 3,223,019 3,446,070 2,951,351 3,581,214 135,144 3.92% Supplies & Maintenance 292,300 186,955 282,300 178,013 261,300 (21,000) -7.44% Professional Services 102,150 98,451 119,810 89,943 135,641 15,831 13.21% Insurances 55,000 55,000 55,000 41,250 55,000 0 0.00% Other Expenses 126,075 122,635 129,580 88,986 135,880 6,300 4.86% Capital Outlay 198,300 171,290 204,000 190,741 200,000 (4,000) -1.96% Police Total 3,971,675 3,857,350 4,236,760 3,540,285 4,369,035 132,275 3.12% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Police Department provides for the public safety within Orono and several surrounding communities. This is accomplished through preventive patrol, traffic enforcement, education, criminal investigation and prosecution. Through renewable contract agreements, the city provides police services to the communities of Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Due to the nature of these cooperative agreements, the Police Department operates, and is budgeted for as a 'cost center'. This enables the City to accurately determine the portion of operating costs that pertain to each contract city. *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Police Department. *Supplies & Maintenance include the operating supplies and maintenance expenses on police equipment and facilities. *Other Expenses includes utilities, fuel, publishing costs, copier leases, and other miscellaneous charges related to police operations. *Insurance Expenses includes a portion of the City's general, liability, and auto insurance costs. *Professional Services includes the police records system, internet, animal care, and medical and psychological evaluations for new officers. Page 19 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Fire Protection Services 42260 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Professional Services 387,000 393,476 397,000 400,547 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% Fire Protection Services Total 387,000 393,476 397,000 400,547 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Fire Department is comprised of renewable contract agreements with the surrounding communities of Long Lake and Wayzata, for fire suppression services. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services are the costs associated with the contract agreements with Long Lake and Wayzata. Page 20 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Building & Zoning 42400 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 586,100 579,795 581,420 535,065 571,839 (9,581) -1.65% Supplies & Maintenance 2,500 214 6,200 3,323 2,000 (4,200) -67.74% Professional Services 93,500 113,104 161,000 89,949 138,500 (22,500) -13.98% Other Expenses 4,400 3,526 13,850 10,405 27,390 13,540 97.76% Building & Zoning Total 686,500 696,639 762,470 638,742 739,729 (22,741) -2.98% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Planning & Zoning Department oversees the development and redevelopment within the City in accordance with established policies and guidelines. The policies and guidelines have been created and are enforced to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the public, as well as the aesthetics of the community. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for Planning and Zoning Staff *Professional Services include engineering and legal consulting services related to Planning and Zoning. *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Planning & Zoning Staff. Page 21 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Engineering 43170 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Professional Services 25,000 9,893 20,000 40,396 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% Engineering Total 25,000 9,893 20,000 40,396 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract with a local firm to provide all engineering services. The Engineering Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services are the costs associated with the contract agreement with the engineering firm. Page 22 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Professional Services Other Expenses 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Public Works Department 43000 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase (Decrease) 3.22% 8.96% N/A 9.86% Public Works Total 554,440 480,765 499,825 418,568 525,893 26,068 5.22% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Street Department provides for the maintainance of all city streets to ensure a safe and driveable condition. Standard maintenance includes seal -coating, patching, snow plowing, and sweeping. Due to its excess storage capacity, the City maintains cooperative agreements with surrounding communities for storage and sale of salt/sand supplies. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Public Works Department. *Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for street repair/maintenance, and vehicle and equipment maintenance. *Other Expenses include electricity costs for street lighting and employee development. Page 23 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) 304,310 284,386 331,500 273,621 342,178 10,678 219,450 157,747 133,695 106,945 145,670 11,975 0 2,220 0 2,237 0 0 30,680 36,413 34,630 35,765 38,045 3,415 Increase (Decrease) 3.22% 8.96% N/A 9.86% Public Works Total 554,440 480,765 499,825 418,568 525,893 26,068 5.22% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Street Department provides for the maintainance of all city streets to ensure a safe and driveable condition. Standard maintenance includes seal -coating, patching, snow plowing, and sweeping. Due to its excess storage capacity, the City maintains cooperative agreements with surrounding communities for storage and sale of salt/sand supplies. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Public Works Department. *Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for street repair/maintenance, and vehicle and equipment maintenance. *Other Expenses include electricity costs for street lighting and employee development. Page 23 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Professional Services Other Expenses 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Parks 45200 2015 2016 2017 Budget Actual Budget 36,050 36,133 39,600 54,000 59,349 71,379 11,000 8,699 1,140 4,050 5,725 4,350 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase (Decrease) 112.99% 15.30% 0.00% 22.99% Parks Total 105,100 109,906 116,469 95,096 173,136 56,667 48.65% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Parks & Recreation Department provides for the maintainance of the City's parks. In addition, the city participates in a joint recreation program with area organizations to ensure a community -wide effort in providing adequate recreational facilities. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services includes the wages and employment taxes for the Parks Department. *Supplies & Maintenance includes the operating supplies and maintenance for all park facilities. *Other Expenses includes the costs associated with the City's participation with Orono Community Education, and equipment rental. Page 24 Dollar Y -T -D 2018 Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) 33,206 84,346 44,746 46,989 82,300 10,921 7,941 1,140 0 6,959 5,350 1,000 Increase (Decrease) 112.99% 15.30% 0.00% 22.99% Parks Total 105,100 109,906 116,469 95,096 173,136 56,667 48.65% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Parks & Recreation Department provides for the maintainance of the City's parks. In addition, the city participates in a joint recreation program with area organizations to ensure a community -wide effort in providing adequate recreational facilities. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services includes the wages and employment taxes for the Parks Department. *Supplies & Maintenance includes the operating supplies and maintenance for all park facilities. *Other Expenses includes the costs associated with the City's participation with Orono Community Education, and equipment rental. Page 24 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Insurances Other Expenses Purchases for Resale 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Golf Course 45210 2015 2016 2017 Budget Actual Budget 77,540 87,672 93,970 26,925 30,372 26,730 12,830 12,883 14,020 22,700 28,414 27,250 8,000 12,020 10,700 General Fund Departmental Summaries Increase (Decrease) -10.04% 16.57% -6.78% 10.71% 29.91% Golf Course Total 147,995 171,362 172,670 171,027 172,831 161 0.09% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Golf Course provides a golfing opportunity for both residents and visitors to the City. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Golf Course. Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for the course and equipment reapirs and maintenance. Insurances include the golf courses share of the City's general, liability, liquor, and auto insurance polices. Other Expenses include utilities, golf cart rental, and advertising. Purchase for Resale are items that are food, beverage, clothing and golf supplies that are sold in the clubhouse. Page 25 Dollar Y -T -D 2018 Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) 89,801 84,533 (9,437) 32,625 31,160 4,430 10,515 13,070 (950) 26,915 30,168 2,918 11,170 13,900 3,200 Increase (Decrease) -10.04% 16.57% -6.78% 10.71% 29.91% Golf Course Total 147,995 171,362 172,670 171,027 172,831 161 0.09% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Golf Course provides a golfing opportunity for both residents and visitors to the City. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Golf Course. Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for the course and equipment reapirs and maintenance. Insurances include the golf courses share of the City's general, liability, liquor, and auto insurance polices. Other Expenses include utilities, golf cart rental, and advertising. Purchase for Resale are items that are food, beverage, clothing and golf supplies that are sold in the clubhouse. Page 25 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries 2018 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Special Services -Consulting & Police 43280 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 34,930 26,784 40,750 32,083 40,750 0 0.00% Professional Services 35,000 96,234 55,000 90,052 55,000 0 0.00% Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 69,930 123,018 95,750 122,135 95,750 0 0.00% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Special Services Department provides a separate 'cost center' for tracking city -provided consulting and Police special service details. Orono residentswho apply for land use variations are subject to be billed for any additional staff, legal, and engineering time that is spent reviewing their application. Thesecharges are recorded in this departmental budget, and the applicants are subsequently billed for this additional time. Orono businesses or residentswho wish to contract with the city for Police security or traffic control are billed for the officers time. The City's costs are recorded in this departmental budget, and are offset by the revenues received from the requesting parties. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES (Reimbursed): *Personal Services include Police Officer overtime wages for security work and/or traffic control. *Professional Services include legal and engineering review expense for land use applications. Page 26 City of Orono - 2018 Budget 2018 General Fund Operating Budget General Fund Departmental Summaries Departmental Summary Special Projects -Contingencies 43290 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 0 0 0 408 0 0 N/A Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Capital & Transfers 390,000 865,000 375,000 375,639 380,000 5,000 1.33% Contingency Items 40,000 8,004 40,990 56,357 0 (40,990) -100.00% Special Projects -Contingencies Total 430,000 873,004 415,990 432,404 380,000 (35,990) -8.65% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Special Projects & Contingencies Department includes funds allocated for planned projects or events that benefit the entire city, and for any unforseen circumstances that produces additional expenses. This department also provides for operating transfers to other funds. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: * Transfers are as follows: Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund 255,000 2014 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund 125,000 *Contingency Items is an amount for unbudgeted and unforseen items that require action before the next budget cycle. GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,579,870 7,962,016 7,988,364 7,141,244 8,193,401 205,036 2.57% Page 27 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Water Operating Fund 2012 Actual Operating Revenue Sales and User Fees 498,953 Operating Expenses Personnel Services 151,932 Professional Services 15,388 Operating and Maint Supplies 31,978 Utilities 65,614 Depreciation 90,464 Maintenance and Repairs 41,744 Admin Charges - General Fund 16,000 Insurance 10,000 Other Expenses 44,778 Total Operating Expenses 467,898 Operating Income (Loss) 31,055 Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) 185,738 Connection Fee 233 Water Tower Rental 107,386 Special Assessments 9,123 Investment Earnings 13,264 Interest Expense (1,900) Misc Revenue 6,173 Total Non -Operating Revenue 134,279 Income (Loss) Before Transfers/CIP 165,334 Operating Transfers (55,000) Enterprise Budget - Summary 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget 439,616 482,816 503,945 524,806 605,000 641,300 148,460 150,591 167,221 199,006 182,138 185,738 49,863 61,098 33,199 46,043 23,000 24,900 33,483 34,064 21,383 34,071 43,900 43,900 73,037 68,342 69,161 63,690 74,100 74,100 94,451 92,645 98,516 126,234 120,000 130,000 64,521 90,725 85,709 78,965 95,800 99,800 16,000 16,000 15,923 16,000 16,000 16,000 9,990 7,050 10,280 10,280 10,280 10,000 34,951 32,952 41,988 49,964 44,410 50,500 524,756 553,467 543,380 624,253 609,628 634,938 (85,140) (70,651) (39,435) (99,447) (4,628) 6,362 - 8,460 - 60,500 85,729 90,016 92,916 95,549 105,000 - 7,979 6,285 - - - - 5,822 37,455 18,632 14,264 10,000 10,000 (899) (23,977) (33,940) (26,681) (25,181) (23,631) 414 113 76 11,341 - - 99,045 118,352 77,684 154,973 89,819 (13,631) 13,905 47,701 38,249 55,526 85,191 (7,269) (55,000) (55,000) (158,000) (158,000) (55,000) (55,000) Page 28 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Sewer Operating Fund Enterprise Budget Summary 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Acutal Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Operating Revenue Sales and User Fees 1,107,357 1,142,534 1,204,554 1,284,521 1,411,424 1,319,240 1,450,000 Operating Expenses Personnel Services 248,776 258,097 259,881 276,127 342,750 309,360 315,394 Professional Services 16,869 30,027 14,175 19,116 31,495 25,500 25,500 Operating and Maint Supplies 9,448 10,779 13,532 11,663 3,465 25,900 25,900 Utilities 31,398 36,322 39,505 30,539 31,273 40,000 35,000 Depreciation 256,217 261,217 270,819 304,437 311,135 305,000 320,000 Maintenance and Repairs 68,275 90,801 86,838 98,222 187,854 112,050 127,270 Admin Charges - General Fund 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Insurance 10,000 10,000 10,000 18,930 18,930 18,930 18,930 Met Council Env Services 424,202 359,863 398,991 487,307 394,530 431,940 473,217 Other Expenses 58,886 58,378 55,418 49,930 47,846 69,150 75,500 Total Operating Expenses 1,156,071 1,147,484 1,181,159 1,328,271 1,401,278 1,369,830 1,448,711 Operating Income (Loss) (48,714) (4,950) 23,395 (43,750) 10,146 (50,590) 1,289 Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) Connection Fee - - 21,253 39,705 122,120 - - Special Assessments 46,181 30,402 143,070 - - - - Investment Earnings 36,749 (33,405) 55,178 30,984 28,211 35,000 35,000 Interest Expense - - - - - - - Misc Revenue 34,471 97,074 39,138 7,130 3,662 20,000 20,000 Total Non -Operating Revenue 117,401 94,071 258,639 77,819 153,993 55,000 55,000 Income (Loss) Before Transfers\CIP 68,687 89,121 282,034 34,069 164,139 4,410 56,289 Operating Transfers (111,000) (111,000) (111,300) (113,575) (113,575) (110,000) (110,000) Page 29 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Storm Water Operating Fund Enterprise Budget Summary Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) Trunk Charges 46,519 107,860 State Grant - - Investment Earnings 8,500 (11,254) Loss on Sale of Assets - - Misc Rev 2,500 - Total Non -Operating Revenue 57,519 90,874 275,213 273,927 - - 20,553 14,154 13,309 15,000 15,000 - - (59,110) - - - - 3,638 - - 96,606 111,427 289,367 231,764 15,000 15,000 Income (Loss) Before Transfers\CIP 150,289 160,158 159,381 381,207 330,871 134,985 129,512 Page 30 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Operating Revenue Sales and User Fees 196,000 209,459 234,673 255,587 265,110 285,524 314,076 Operating Expenses Personnel Services 45,000 72,298 61,030 54,743 42,209 47,369 49,094 Professional Services 10,000 13,646 25,579 38,746 18,220 19,500 19,500 Operating and Maint Supplies 1,250 1,538 3,032 1,569 1,532 1,000 2,300 Utilities - - - - - - - Depreciation 20,000 27,885 32,092 32,465 35,817 31,000 38,000 Maintanence and Repairs 8,780 11,631 47,003 19,095 44,677 43,000 67,000 Admin Charges - General Fund 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Insurance 1,500 1,500 1,125 720 720 1,970 1,970 Other Expenses 700 1,409 858 409 6,828 5,700 5,700 Total Operating Expenses 103,230 145,907 186,719 163,747 166,003 165,539 199,564 Operating Income (Loss) 92,770 63,552 47,954 91,840 99,107 119,985 114,512 Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) Trunk Charges 46,519 107,860 State Grant - - Investment Earnings 8,500 (11,254) Loss on Sale of Assets - - Misc Rev 2,500 - Total Non -Operating Revenue 57,519 90,874 275,213 273,927 - - 20,553 14,154 13,309 15,000 15,000 - - (59,110) - - - - 3,638 - - 96,606 111,427 289,367 231,764 15,000 15,000 Income (Loss) Before Transfers\CIP 150,289 160,158 159,381 381,207 330,871 134,985 129,512 Page 30 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Recycling Operating Fund Enterprise Budget Summary Page 31 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Operating Revenue Sales and User Fees 86,632 88,708 96,660 104,500 107,902 107,600 Operating Expenses Personnel Services 9,992 9,177 5,374 6,490 6,830 6,980 Professional Services 99,457 98,281 104,674 110,500 110,500 115,000 Operating and Maint Supplies - - - - Utilities - - - - Depreciation - - - - Maintanence and Repairs 1,500 - 1,532 1,000 1,000 1,500 Admin Charges - General Fund - 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Insurance - - - 500 500 500 Other Expenses 3,888 6,025 2,526 7,000 3,670 3,670 Total Operating Expenses 114,837 114,983 116,606 127,990 125,000 130,150 Operating Income (Loss) (28,205) (26,275) (19,946) (23,490) (17,098) (22,550) Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) County Grant 24,280 24,793 30,190 25,000 25,000 25,000 Investment Earnings (819) (3) 41 - - Misc Rev (RMO and Penalty) 8,589 2,957 4,789 4,000 4,000 10,000 Total Non -Operating Revenue 32,050 27,747 35,020 29,000 29,000 35,000 Income (Loss) Before Transfers 3,845 1,472 15,074 5,510 11,902 12,450 Page 31 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Cable TV Fund 2013 Actual Operating Revenue Peg Fees Franchise Fees (Q1 $18,942; Q2 $19,488) Operating Expenses Personnel Services Professional Services Operating and Maint Supplies Utilities Depreciation Maintanence and Repairs Admin Charges - General Fund Insurance Other Expenses _ Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Non -Operating Revenue (Expenses) Investment Earnings Misc Rev (Includes Penalty) _ Total Non -Operating Revenue Income (Loss) Before Transfers\CIP Enterprise Budget Summary 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget 18,402 - - - - 76,493 77,674 77,510 76,000 77,000 50 11,831 8,899 13,660 30,415 8,393 3,385 1,465 4,500 2,000 247 47 - - - - 4,314 4,600 4,600 4,600 3,985 - 500 500 2,000 - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 - 9,099 15,000 15,000 20,000 _ 12,675 31,176 32,964 40,760 61,515 - 63,818 46,498 44,546 35,240 15,485 55 550 1,000 1,000 1,000 55 550 1,000 1,000 1,000 - 63,873 47,048 45,546 36,240 16,485 Page 32 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Mayor & Council 41110 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101-41110-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 17,033 18,200 18,200 18,200 16,392 18,200 0 0.00% 101-41110-122 122 FICA 1,303 1,392 1,392 1,390 1,254 1,392 2 0.14% 101-41110-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 90 90 50 70 53 73 3 4.29% Total Personal Services 18,426 19,682 19,642 19,660 17,698 19,665 5 0.03% Other Expenses 101-41110-433 433 Memberships 70,070 70,387 62,198 63,990 67,947 64,000 10 0.02% 101-41110-437 437 Training & Development 0 540 267 500 325 500 0 0.00% 101-41110-439 439 Meeting Expenses 1,258 836 1,332 1,000 1,115 1,000 0 0.00% 101-41110-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 0 0 469 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 71,328 71,763 63,797 65,490 69,856 65,500 10 0.02% City Council Total 89,755 91,446 83,440 85,150 87,554 85,165 15 0.02% Page 33 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Administration 41300 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101-41300-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 169,692 189,820 178,244 197,790 143,858 220,379 22,589 11.42% 101-41300-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime (70) 0 1,098 1,300 149 1,300 0 0.00% 101-41300-103 103 Part -Time Employees 12,153 0 0 0 60,720 0 0 N/A 101-41300-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 3,153 7,653 9,171 10,500 8,300 10,500 0 0.00% 101-41300-121 121 PERA 12,965 13,545 13,305 14,930 10,074 16,626 1,696 11.36% 101-41300-122 122 FICA 14,105 14,083 13,536 16,030 15,595 17,762 1,732 10.80% 101-41300-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 19,206 24,960 34,733 37,020 28,990 37,920 900 2.43% 101-41300-142 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 0 0 15,443 0 0 N/A 101-41300-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 1,127 1,150 1,210 1,280 960 1,397 117 9.14% Total Personal Services 232,329 251,211 251,296 278,850 284,090 305,884 27,034 9.69% Supplies & Maintenance 101-41300-208 208 Books & Periodicals 286 286 44 300 183 300 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 286 286 44 300 183 300 0 0.00% Professional Services 101-41300-319 319 Professional Services 6,385 5,485 5,245 6,000 4,758 6,000 0 0.00% Total Professional Serivices 6,385 5,485 5,245 6,000 4,758 6,000 0 0.00% Page 34 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Administration cont. 41300 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 101-41300-331 331 Travel Expenses 4,850 4,623 3,600 4,000 900 4,000 0 0.00% 101-41300-340 340 General Advertising 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41300-433 433 Memberships 1,350 1,396 1,338 1,000 171 1,000 0 0.00% 101-41300-437 437 Training & Development 2,866 2,162 4,338 3,500 647 3,500 0 0.00% 101-41300-439 439 Meeting Expenses 679 1,246 553 500 451 500 0 0.00% 101-41300-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 3,044 2,860 2,394 3,000 842 3,000 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 13,209 12,286 12,223 12,000 3,010 12,000 0 0.00% Administration Total 252,208 269,268 268,808 297,150 292,041 324,184 27,034 9.10% Page 35 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Elections 41410 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101-41410-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 2,834 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 101-41410-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 10,011 0 12,330 0 0 16,000 16,000 N/A 101-41410-121 121 PERA 200 0 0 80 0 75 (5) -6.25% 101-41410-122 122 FICA 194 0 84 80 0 77 (3) -3.75% Total Personal Services 13,239 0 12,414 1,160 0 17,152 15,992 1378.62% Supplies & Maintenance 101-41410-208 208 Books & Periodicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41410-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 2,192 0 3,763 2,000 0 2,500 500 25.00% 101-41410-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 0 0 281 0 0 300 300 N/A Total Supplies & Maintenance 2,192 0 4,044 2,000 0 2,800 800 40.00% Other Expenses 101-41410-319 319 Professional Services 1,050 0 0 0 0 1,100 1,100 N/A 101-41410-322 322 Postage 533 316 1,328 0 0 1,500 1,500 N/A 101-41410-331 331 Travel Expenses 87 0 89 0 0 100 100 N/A 101-41410-340 340 General Advertising 214 0 325 0 0 400 400 N/A 101-41410-412 412 Building Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41410-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41410-437 437 Training & Development 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 N/A 101-41410-439 439 Meeting Expenses 523 0 36 0 0 1,000 1,000 N/A 101-41410-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 327 0 488 0 0 500 500 N/A Total Other Expenses 2,735 316 2,266 0 0 5,600 5,600 N/A Elections Total 18,165 316 18,725 3,160 0 25,552 22,392 708.61% Page 36 City of Orono - 2018 Budget 101-41550-302 City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Assessing 41550 2014 2015 2016 Actual Actual Actual Assessing Services 302 Assessing Services 153,107 166,074 86,000 Total Assessing Service 153,107 166,074 86,000 General Fund Line Item Dollar % 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 180,000 176,164 182,000 2,000 1.11% 180,000 176,164 182,000 2,000 1.11% Assessing Total 153,107 166,074 86,000 180,000 176,164 182,000 2,000 1.11% Page 37 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Finance Department 41500 Supplies & Maintenance 1,347 3,448 1,540 605 5,400 3,860 250.65% Dollar % 0 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 0 0 0 Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101-41500-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 101-41500-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 218,786 208,801 219,329 210,430 188,719 211,239 809 0.38% 101-41500-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 200 1,134 200 0 0.00% 101-41500-103 103 Part -Time Employees 21,397 21,368 19,497 22,520 21,754 23,953 1,433 6.36% 101-41500-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41500-121 121 PERA 17,114 17,271 17,225 17,470 15,853 17,639 169 0.97% 101-41500-122 122 FICA 17,278 16,647 16,790 17,820 15,835 17,992 172 0.97% 101-41500-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 34,166 41,207 38,337 52,080 39,728 53,880 1,800 3.46% 101-41500-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 1,460 1,250 1,330 1,610 1,208 1,623 13 0.81% Total Personal Services 310,201 306,544 312,508 322,130 284,231 326,526 4,396 1.36% Supplies & Maintenance 1,347 3,448 1,540 605 5,400 3,860 250.65% 101-41500-208 208 Books & Periodicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 8,256 2.55% 101-41500-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Other Expenses 101-41500-331 331 Travel Expenses 39 190 0 200 175 1,500 1,300 650.00% 101-41500-433 433 Memberships 325 325 325 340 330 400 60 17.65% 101-41500-437 437 Training & Development 490 833 3,123 1,000 100 3,500 2,500 250.00% Total Other Expenses 854 1,347 3,448 1,540 605 5,400 3,860 250.65% Finance Total 311,056 307,892 315,955 323,670 284,836 331,926 8,256 2.55% Page 38 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Law/Legal Services 41600 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Total Professional Services 98,493 96,581 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% Law/Legal Services Total 98,493 96,581 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% Page 39 Professional Services 101-41600-305 305 Legal -Retainer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41600-306 306 Legal -Prosecution 37,549 38,500 42,478 40,000 29,731 40,000 0 0.00% 101-41600-307 307 Legal -Consulting 47,869 46,988 51,793 50,000 61,168 60,000 10,000 20.00% 101-41600-308 308 Code Enforcement 4,789 2,054 1,999 4,000 1,702 2,000 (2,000) -50.00% 101-41600-309 309 Jail Charges 8,285 9,040 16,648 10,000 6,703 10,000 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 98,493 96,581 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% Law/Legal Services Total 98,493 96,581 112,918 104,000 99,304 112,000 8,000 7.69% Page 39 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Central Services 41900 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Page 40 Supplies & Maintenance 101-41900-201 201 Office supplies 13,889 13,130 11,685 14,000 8,485 12,000 (2,000) -14.29% 101-41900-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 483 3,838 970 3,000 4,380 3,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 4,311 3,357 2,520 3,500 2,902 3,500 0 0.00% 101-41900-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 18,870 15,249 9,949 16,000 9,870 10,000 (6,000) -37.50% 101-41900-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 469 570 3,302 700 5,878 3,000 2,300 328.57% 101-41900-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 15,978 23,870 20,699 20,000 44,054 20,500 500 2.50% 101-41900-407 407 Janitorial Services 18,584 18,557 17,171 19,000 14,263 19,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-416 416 Software Licensing 4,015 10,941 24,385 20,000 22,420 22,000 2,000 10.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 76,599 89,511 90,681 96,200 112,253 93,000 (3,200) -3.33% Professional Services 101-41900-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 21,250 20,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-311 311 Data Processing Communication 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 N/A 101-41900-319 319 Professional Services 10,628 11,690 26,501 18,000 17,113 18,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-370 370 Insurance Agent of Record 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 30,628 31,690 46,501 38,000 38,438 38,000 0 0.00% Insurances 101-41900-361 361 General Liability Ins 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 7,500 10,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,750 5,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-363 363 Bonds Insurance 800 200 200 200 150 200 0 0.00% 101-41900-365 365 Boiler & Machinery Ins 2,000 1,300 1,300 1,300 975 1,300 0 0.00% 101-41900-366 366 Property Insurance 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,750 5,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-367 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 2,400 1,300 1,300 1,300 975 1,300 0 0.00% 101-41900-368 368 Automotive Insurance 5,000 7,400 7,400 7,400 5,550 7,400 0 0.00% Total Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 30,200 0 0.00% Page 40 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Central Services cont. 41900 Dollar 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 101-41900-312 312 Bank Fees 3,856 4,408 6,181 4,500 4,747 4,000 (500) -11.11% 101-41900-321 321 Telephone 7,378 8,331 11,343 10,000 8,992 10,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-322 322 Postage 10,697 10,739 10,412 11,000 8,957 11,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-329 329 Internet/Other Communications 5,315 3,863 6,873 8,000 7,653 6,000 (2,000) -25.00% 101-41900-352 352 Printing & Publishing 13,246 15,182 15,373 15,000 21,193 15,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-381 381 Gas & Electric 31,747 25,621 29,757 29,000 23,396 29,100 100 0.34% 101-41900-382 382 Water Utilities 2,134 3,046 4,111 3,000 5,585 2,000 (1,000) -33.33% 101-41900-413 413 Office Equipment Rental 17,645 17,045 16,685 20,000 17,396 20,000 0 0.00% 101-41900-440 440 Special Equipment Replacement 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41900-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 2,248 919 307 1,000 388 500 (500) -50.00% Total Other Expenses 94,267 89,154 101,054 101,500 98,308 97,600 (3,900) -3.84% Capital Outlay 101-41900-512 512 Spec Assmts on Land & Int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-41900-750 750 Interest on Special Assmnts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Central Services Total 231,693 240,555 268,437 265,900 271,649 258,800 (7,100) -2.67% Page 41 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Human Services 41800 Dollar 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 101-41800-490 490 Contributions to Civic Org's 9,500 11,997 12,426 12,400 11,099 12,400 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 9,500 11,997 12,426 12,400 11,099 12,400 0 0.00% Human Services Total 9,500 11,997 12,426 12,400 11,099 12,400 0 0.00% Page 42 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Supplies & Maintenance 101-42110-201 201 Office supplies 101-42110-208 General Fund Line Item Books & Periodicals 101-42110-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants City of Orono 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 101-42110-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 101-42110-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 101-42110-228 228 2018 Line Item Budget 101-42110-229 229 Explorers Program expenses 101-42110-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 101-42110-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Police Department 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 101-42110-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 101-42110-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 101-42110-407 407 42110 101-42110-416 416 Software Licensing 8.00% 8,916 18,512 15,951 16,000 4,267 16,000 0 0.00% 981 3,456 412 Dollar % 4,000 0 0.00% 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 15,206 7,601 6,228 Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 50,000 Personal Services 45,000 (5,000) -10.00% 6,437 4,840 4,597 8,000 4,571 101-42110-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 2,247,403 2,226,744 2,291,675 2,408,910 2,104,153 2,520,908 111,998 4.65% 101-42110-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 22,192 18,608 21,890 50,000 17,607 50,000 0 0.00% 101-42110-103 103 Part -Time Employees 84,937 98,356 71,090 54,330 46,035 54,333 3 0.01% 101-42110-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 423 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42110-121 121 PERA 332,179 351,635 362,096 374,280 329,156 391,520 17,240 4.61% 101-42110-122 122 FICA 44,098 44,327 44,316 47,820 41,332 50,086 2,266 4.74% 101-42110-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 290,986 315,013 338,372 401,580 331,206 400,080 (1,500) -0.37% 101-42110-142 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 404 2,914 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42110-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 68,325 65,270 70,830 109,150 81,863 114,000 4,850 4.44% Total Personal Services 3,090,121 3,120,780 3,203,183 3,446,070 2,951,351 3,580,927 134,857 3.91% 12,544 Supplies & Maintenance 101-42110-201 201 Office supplies 101-42110-208 208 Books & Periodicals 101-42110-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 101-42110-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 101-42110-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 101-42110-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 101-42110-228 228 Training Supplies 101-42110-229 229 Explorers Program expenses 101-42110-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 101-42110-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 101-42110-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 101-42110-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 101-42110-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 101-42110-407 407 Janitorial Services 101-42110-416 416 Software Licensing 12,544 6,835 7,351 12,000 2,942 8,000 (4,000) -33.33% 0 0 0 1,000 324 1,000 0 0.00% 91,933 48,008 44,913 115,000 71,108 100,000 (15,000) -13.04% 4,581 6,690 4,657 6,000 5,078 6,000 0 0.00% 230 911 393 1,300 178 1,300 0 0.00% 25,112 27,738 31,783 25,000 21,818 27,000 2,000 8.00% 8,916 18,512 15,951 16,000 4,267 16,000 0 0.00% 981 3,456 412 4,000 2,390 4,000 0 0.00% 1,435 2,642 1,839 6,000 2,655 5,000 (1,000) -16.67% 15,206 7,601 6,228 5,000 6,423 5,000 0 0.00% 50,009 35,045 35,529 50,000 30,431 45,000 (5,000) -10.00% 6,437 4,840 4,597 8,000 4,571 8,000 0 0.00% 3,120 7,678 7,219 6,500 5,490 6,500 0 0.00% 13,457 12,918 12,434 15,000 10,395 15,000 0 0.00% 1,338 9,987 13,651 11,500 9,943 13,500 2,000 17.39% Total Supplies & Maintenance 235,300 192,860 186,955 282,300 178,013 261,300 (21,000) -7.44% Page 43 City of Orono - 2018 Budget 101-42110-304 101-42110-307 101-42110-310 101-42110-311 101-42110-317 101-42110-319 101-42110-370 101-42110-361 101-42110-362 101-42110-366 101-42110-367 101-42110-368 101-42110-379 City of Orono 98,451 2014 Dollar Police Department cont. Actual Professional Services 2018 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 307 Legal -Consulting 6,372 310 LOGIS-Applications 61,104 311 Data Processing Communication 3,909 317 Animal Care 85 319 Professional Services 12,479 370 Insurance Agent of Record 0 90,310 65,752 Total Professional Services 83,949 18.08% 6,000 Insurances 6,000 361 General Liability Ins 25,000 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 9,100 366 Property Insurance 3,300 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 500 368 Automotive Insurance 6,600 379 Insurance Deductibles 0 Total Insurances 44,500 City of Orono 98,451 2018 Line Item Budget Dollar Police Department cont. 2017 42110 2018 2015 2016 Actual Actual 0 0 3,736 7,301 64,164 73,184 4,115 4,947 85 424 12,091 12,596 0 0 General Fund Line Item 84,190 98,451 119,810 Dollar % 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 8,000 4,835 8,000 0 0.00% 90,310 65,752 106,641 16,331 18.08% 6,000 8,203 6,000 0 0.00% 1,000 110 500 (500) -50.00% 14,500 11,044 14,500 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A 84,190 98,451 119,810 35,000 35,000 35,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0 0 89,943 135,641 15,831 13.21% 26,250 35,000 0 0.00% 7,500 10,000 0 0.00% 750 1,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 N/A 6,750 9,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 N/A 55,000 55,000 55,000 41,250 55,000 0 0.00% Page 44 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Police Department cont. 42110 2014 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual Budget General Fund Line Item Dollar % Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 23,147 Other Expenses 101-42110-321 321 Telephone 101-42110-322 322 Postage 101-42110-329 329 Internet/Other Communications 101-42110-331 331 Travel Expenses 101-42110-340 340 General Advertising 101-42110-352 352 Printing & Publishing 101-42110-381 381 Gas & Electric 101-42110-382 382 Water Utilities 101-42110-413 413 Office Equipment Rental 101-42110-414 414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent 101-42110-433 433 Memberships 101-42110-436 436 Towing Charges 101-42110-437 437 Training & Development 101-42110-439 439 Meeting Expenses 101-42110-440 440 Special Equipment Replacement 101-42110-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 101-42110-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Police Department cont. 42110 2014 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual Budget General Fund Line Item Dollar % Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 23,147 19,166 21,229 23,230 16,659 23,230 0 0.00% 223 114 99 1,200 114 1,200 0 0.00% 5,612 3,598 5,893 6,300 4,552 6,800 500 7.94% 89 28 580 250 0 250 0 0.00% 132 55 290 0 145 0 0 N/A 1,692 1,972 2,220 1,800 660 1,800 0 0.00% 14,125 24,965 18,100 20,000 14,891 20,000 0 0.00% 781 1,634 1,405 1,200 0 1,200 0 0.00% 2,578 4,106 4,133 3,300 3,989 3,600 300 9.09% 23,782 23,443 23,211 20,000 17,406 23,000 3,000 15.00% 2,110 2,770 3,000 5,500 2,680 5,000 (500) -9.09% 53 147 157 0 0 0 0 N/A 32,676 20,356 30,254 35,000 25,622 38,000 3,000 8.57% 1,890 2,142 2,395 2,500 1,503 2,500 0 0.00% 228 3,668 5,164 5,000 0 5,000 0 0.00% 1,172 2,040 3,282 1,300 199 1,300 0 0.00% 226 232 1,222 3,000 567 3,000 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 110,517 110,434 122,635 129,580 88,986 135,880 6,300 4.86% Page 45 Capital Outlay 101-42110-550 550 Automotive Equipment 141,988 149,338 135,874 153,000 151,137 156,000 3,000 1.96% 101-42110-560 560 Furniture and Fixtures 0 0 0 0 333 0 0 N/A 101-42110-570 570 Office Equip and Furnishings 7,500 6,176 0 7,000 210 3,000 (4,000) -57.14% 101-42110-575 575 IT Hardware & Applications 11,430 8,951 5,378 23,000 18,216 20,000 (3,000) -13.04% 101-42110-580 580 Other Equipment 0 9,583 30,038 21,000 20,846 21,000 0 0.00% Total Capital Outlay 160,919 174,048 171,290 204,000 190,741 200,000 (4,000) -1.96% Police Total 3,725,306 3,737,312 3,837,514 4,236,760 3,540,285 4,368,748 131,988 3.12% Page 45 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Fire Protection Services 42260 Page 46 Dollar 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Professional Services 101-42260-318 318 Fire Services 379,581 383,856 393,476 397,000 400,547 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% 101-42260-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 379,581 383,856 393,476 397,000 400,547 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% Fire Protection Services Total 379,581 383,856 393,476 397,000 400,547 390,000 (7,000) -1.76% Page 46 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Supplies & Maintenance General Fund Line Item 101-42400-208 City of Orono Books & Periodicals 0 262 142 500 0 500 0 0.00% 101-42400-212 2018 Line Item Budget Motor Fuels & Lubricants 500 1,876 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% Building & Zoning 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 50 449 22 0 3,220 0 0 N/A 42400 226 Clothing & personal equipment 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42400-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 0 0 Dollar % 13 0 (3,200) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 0 0 (1,000) Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 90 Personal Services 0 N/A 101-42400-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 385,500 428,200 452,306 438,290 413,673 428,441 (9,849) -2.25% 101-42400-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 65 115 379 200 35 200 0 0.00% 101-42400-103 103 Part -Time Employees 12,153 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42400-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42400-121 121 PERA 28,255 31,784 33,690 32,890 29,321 32,148 (742) -2.26% 101-42400-122 122 FICA 30,509 33,318 34,579 33,540 30,233 32,791 (749) -2.23% 101-42400-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 47,170 52,105 52,947 74,040 59,957 75,840 1,800 2.43% 101-42400-142 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42400-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 2,636 2,510 2,620 2,460 1,845 2,419 (41) -1.67% Total Personal Services 506,287 548,032 576,521 581,420 535,065 571,839 (9,581) -1.65% Total Supplies & Maintenance 593 2,587 214 6,200 3,323 2,000 (4,200) -67.74% Supplies & Maintenance 101-42400-208 208 Books & Periodicals 0 262 142 500 0 500 0 0.00% 101-42400-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 500 1,876 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 101-42400-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 50 449 22 0 3,220 0 0 N/A 101-42400-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-42400-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 0 0 0 3,200 13 0 (3,200) -100.00% 101-42400-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 43 0 0 1,000 0 0 (1,000) -100.00% 101-42400-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 N/A Total Supplies & Maintenance 593 2,587 214 6,200 3,323 2,000 (4,200) -67.74% Total Professional Services 109,765 116,315 113,104 161,000 89,949 138,500 (22,500) -13.98% City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Building & Zoning cont. 42400 Page 47 Professional Services 101-42400-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 4,339 104 0 12,500 1,606 7,500 (5,000) -40.00% 101-42400-307 307 Legal -Consulting 23,600 23,886 24,864 16,000 15,345 16,000 0 0.00% 101-42400-310 310 Inspection Services 71,620 89,226 85,065 100,000 60,659 90,000 (10,000) -10.00% 10142400-312 12 Bank Fees 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 N/A 101-42400-319 319 Professional Services 10,206 3,100 3,175 32,500 12,340 20,000 (12,500) -38.46% Total Professional Services 109,765 116,315 113,104 161,000 89,949 138,500 (22,500) -13.98% City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Building & Zoning cont. 42400 Page 47 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Total Other Expenses General Fund Line Item Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 1,900 Other Expenses 101-42400-331 331 Travel Expenses 101-42400-340 340 General Advertising 101-42400-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 101-42400-416 416 Software Licensing 101-42400-433 433 Memberships 101-42400-437 437 Training & Development 101-42400-439 439 Meeting Expenses 101-42400-441 441 Licenses & Taxes Total Other Expenses General Fund Line Item Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 1,900 402 468 1,500 286 2,250 750 50.00% 25 0 0 0 921 1,000 1,000 N/A 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 6,000 15,600 15,600 N/A 475 1,330 875 800 675 1,200 400 50.00% 1,744 1,386 2,013 2,000 298 2,740 740 37.00% 626 881 139 9,450 600 4,500 (4,950) -52.38% 32 0 32 100 1,500 100 0 0.00% 4,802 4,000 3,526 13,850 10,405 27,390 13,540 97.76% Building & Zoning Total 621,447 670,933 693,366 762,470 638,742 739,729 (22,741) -2.98% Page 48 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Engineering 43170 Page 49 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Professional Services 101-43170-303 303 Engineering -Retainer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-43170-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 14,178 17,080 9,893 20,000 40,396 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% Total Professional Services 14,178 17,080 9,893 20,000 40,396 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% Engineering Total 14,178 17,080 9,893 20,000 40,396 15,000 (5,000) -25.00% Page 49 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Public Works Department 43000 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101-43000-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 214,657 200,530 192,098 215,250 176,264 220,971 5,721 2.66% 101-43000-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 11,067 6,008 11,228 11,000 6,839 11,000 0 0.00% 101-43000-121 121 PERA 14,446 15,135 14,496 16,970 14,181 17,398 428 2.52% 101-43000-122 122 FICA 15,439 15,143 14,195 17,310 14,236 17,746 436 2.52% 101-43000-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 29,378 39,633 37,622 52,170 48,001 55,767 3,597 6.89% 101-43000-142 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-43000-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 14,926 13,730 12,680 18,800 14,100 19,296 496 2.64% Total Personal Services 299,913 290,179 282,319 331,500 273,621 342,178 10,678 3.22% Supplies & Maintenance 101-43000-208 208 Books & Periodicals 159 169 169 170 0 170 0 0.00% 101-43000-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 39,954 14,504 31,663 40,000 9,932 35,000 (5,000) -12.50% 101-43000-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 15,606 16,882 10,644 16,000 16,369 16,000 0 0.00% 101-43000-222 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 7,828 5,286 4,433 8,000 4,257 8,000 0 0.00% 101-43000-224 224 Street Maint. Materials/Supply 33,496 47,419 53,524 44,525 28,957 48,000 3,475 7.80% 101-43000-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 2,527 4,109 3,915 3,500 5,268 4,000 500 14.29% 101-43000-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 978 1,377 2,708 1,000 2,939 2,000 1,000 100.00% 101-43000-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 7,059 11,185 11,350 10,000 12,124 10,000 0 0.00% 101-43000-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 2,594 5,855 14,780 3,000 8,973 10,000 7,000 233.33% 101-43000-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 708 1,982 10,635 0 1,261 4,500 4,500 N/A 101-43000-408 408 Contracted Street Maint. 14,280 63,927 10,779 7,500 16,864 8,000 500 6.67% Total Supplies & Maintenance 125,190 172,695 154,600 133,695 106,945 145,670 11,975 8.96% Professional Services 101-43000-304 304 PW Engineering -Consulting 0 641 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-43000-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 2,220 0 2,237 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 0 641 2,220 0 2,237 0 0 N/A Page 50 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Public Works Department cont. 43000 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 101-43000-331 331 Travel Expenses 63 352 0 0 169 175 175 N/A 101-43000-381 381 Gas & Electric 3,397 3,027 4,686 4,880 1,615 4,880 0 0.00% 101-43000-386 386 Street Lighting 22,790 24,612 26,064 25,000 23,593 25,000 0 0.00% 101-43000-414 414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent 0 0 775 0 4,747 750 750 N/A 101-43000-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 409 254 1,309 960 2,091 960 0 0.00% 101-43000-416 416 Software Licensing 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 N/A 101-43000-433 433 Memberships 618 284 180 0 0 250 250 N/A 101-43000-437 437 Training & Development 1,798 3,498 2,867 3,500 2,888 3,500 0 0.00% 101-43000-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 747 50 280 250 44 250 0 0.00% 101-43000-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 40 647 252 40 617 280 240 600.00% Total Other Expenses 29,863 32,724 36,413 34,630 35,765 38,045 3,415 9.86% Public Works Total 454,966 496,239 475,551 499,825 418,568 525,893 26,068 5.22% Page 51 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Parks 45200 2014 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual Budget General Fund Line Item Dollar % Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 16,589 Personal Services 101-45200-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 101-45200-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 101-45200-103 103 Part -Time Employees 101-45200-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 101-45200-121 121 PERA 101-45200-122 122 FICA 101-45200-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 101-45200-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Parks 45200 2014 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual Budget General Fund Line Item Dollar % Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 16,589 21,368 19,220 20,270 16,156 49,860 29,590 145.98% 202 0 231 0 465 0 0 N/A 0 0 10,023 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 8,713 0 10,000 10,082 10,000 0 0.00% 1,233 1,420 1,419 1,520 1,246 3,739 2,219 145.99% 1,275 1,589 1,593 2,320 1,437 4,579 2,259 97.37% 1,825 2,701 2,091 3,600 2,403 11,574 7,974 221.50% 809 740 1,490 1,890 1,418 4,594 2,704 143.07% Total Personal Services 21,933 36,530 36,067 39,600 33,206 84,346 44,746 112.99% Total Supplies & Maintenance 41,688 57,453 59,349 71,379 46,989 82,300 10,921 15.30% Professional Services 101-45200-319 319 Professional Services 405 9,645 8,699 1,140 7,941 1,140 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 405 9,645 8,699 1,140 7,941 1,140 0 0.00% Page 52 Supplies & Maintenance 101-45200-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45200-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 2,247 1,629 908 0 867 500 500 N/A 101-45200-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 3,222 3,163 9,875 7,600 9,360 7,600 0 0.00% 101-45200-225 225 Misc Park Supplies 0 6,573 7,309 10,000 1,411 15,000 5,000 50.00% 101-45200-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 0 0 20 0 624 200 200 N/A 101-45200-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 176 0 3,744 0 1,447 1,000 1,000 N/A 101-45200-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 36,043 46,088 37,472 53,779 33,280 58,000 4,221 7.85% Total Supplies & Maintenance 41,688 57,453 59,349 71,379 46,989 82,300 10,921 15.30% Professional Services 101-45200-319 319 Professional Services 405 9,645 8,699 1,140 7,941 1,140 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 405 9,645 8,699 1,140 7,941 1,140 0 0.00% Page 52 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Parks cont. 45200 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 101-45200-331 331 Travel Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45200-381 381 Gas & Electric 406 416 290 550 152 550 0 0.00% 101-45200-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 3,242 4,750 5,249 3,500 6,488 3,500 0 0.00% 101-45200-416 416 Software Licensing 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 N/A 101-45200-439 439 Meeting Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45200-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 290 580 0 300 290 300 0 0.00% 101-45200-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 186 0 30 0 0 N/A 101-45200-490 490 Contributions to Civic Org's 2,478 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 6,416 5,746 5,725 4,350 6,959 5,350 1,000 22.99% Parks Total 70,442 109,375 109,840 116,469 95,096 173,136 56,667 48.65% Page 53 City of Orono - 2018 Budget Supplies & Maintenance General Fund Line Item 101-45210-201 City of Orono Office supplies 215 416 239 300 213 330 30 10.00% 101-45210-212 2018 Line Item Budget Motor Fuels & Lubricants 4,763 2,745 2,716 5,000 0 3,500 (1,500) -30.00% Golf Course 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 2,309 659 4,336 1,500 1,602 2,500 1,000 66.67% 45210 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 4,958 6,044 7,411 4,500 6,988 6,800 2,300 51.11% 101-45210-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 0 0 Dollar % 150 180 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 389 500 0 Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 0 Personal Services 100 N/A 101-45210-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 0 267 185 101-45210-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 34,219 31,809 31,811 32,450 30,558 29,337 (3,113) -9.59% 101-45210-103 103 Part -Time Employees 35,323 41,073 49,914 53,340 42,581 19,262 (34,078) -63.89% 101-45210-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 2,095 960 880 0 10,085 15,000 15,000 N/A 101-45210-121 121 PERA 408 0 0 0 1,238 2,200 2,200 N/A 101-45210-122 122 FICA 3,156 3,042 3,171 6,560 4,125 4,865 (1,695) -25.84% 101-45210-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 5,297 0 0 0 0 7,976 7,976 N/A 101-45210-142 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-143 143 OPEB Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 1,548 1,330 1,790 1,620 1,215 5,893 4,273 263.77% Total Personal Services 82,047 78,214 87,566 93,970 89,801 84,533 (9,437) -10.04% Total Supplies & Maintenance 30,643 29,006 30,372 26,730 32,625 31,160 4,430 16.57% Page 54 Supplies & Maintenance 101-45210-201 201 Office supplies 215 416 239 300 213 330 30 10.00% 101-45210-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 4,763 2,745 2,716 5,000 0 3,500 (1,500) -30.00% 101-45210-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 2,309 659 4,336 1,500 1,602 2,500 1,000 66.67% 101-45210-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 4,958 6,044 7,411 4,500 6,988 6,800 2,300 51.11% 101-45210-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 0 0 152 180 150 180 0 0.00% 101-45210-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 0 195 59 500 389 500 0 0.00% 101-45210-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 0 53 165 0 0 100 100 N/A 101-45210-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 0 267 185 250 37 250 0 0.00% 101-45210-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 1,365 2,170 4,352 2,500 10,955 3,000 500 20.00% 101-45210-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 17,033 16,458 10,758 12,000 12,290 14,000 2,000 16.67% Total Supplies & Maintenance 30,643 29,006 30,372 26,730 32,625 31,160 4,430 16.57% Page 54 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Golf Course cont. 45210 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Insurances 101-45210-361 361 General Liability Ins 7,500 7,500 7,500 8,000 6,000 7,500 (500) -6.25% 101-45210-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,125 1,500 0 0.00% 101-45210-365 365 Boiler& Machinery Ins 300 300 300 350 263 300 (50) -14.29% 101-45210-366 366 Property Insurance 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,650 1,988 2,300 (350) -13.21% 101-45210-367 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 300 300 300 350 263 300 (50) -14.29% 101-45210-368 368 Automotive Insurance 370 370 370 370 278 370 0 0.00% 101-45210-369 369 Dram Shop Insurance 1,123 1,123 613 800 600 800 0 0.00% Total Insurances 13,393 13,393 12,883 14,020 10,515 13,070 (950) -6.78% Other Expenses 101-45210-312 312 Bank Fees 2,315 4,365 4,962 4,000 3,546 5,000 1,000 25.00% 101-45210-319 319 Professional Services 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-321 321 Telephone 2,188 2,952 3,485 2,500 2,547 3,300 800 32.00% 101-45210-331 331 Travel Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-340 340 General Advertising 715 1,519 500 1,750 500 1,750 0 0.00% 101-45210-352 352 Printing & Publishing 58 0 379 0 793 736 736 N/A 101-45210-381 381 Gas & Electric 7,874 8,025 8,152 8,500 7,339 8,500 0 0.00% 101-45210-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 8,399 7,529 10,012 9,500 11,760 9,882 382 4.02% 101-45210-433 433 Memberships 0 150 270 300 120 300 0 0.00% 101-45210-437 437 Training & Development 0 19 0 150 0 150 0 0.00% 101-45210-440 440 Special Equipment Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 522 675 535 550 294 550 0 0.00% 101-45210-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 56 0 119 0 17 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 22,127 25,733 28,414 27,250 26,915 30,168 2,918 10.71% Page 55 City of Orono - 2018 Budget General Fund Line Item City of Orono 2018 Line Item Budget Golf Course cont. 45210 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Purchases for Resale 101-45210-090 090 PURCHASES FOR RESALE 0 (696) 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-45210-091 091 Beer For Resale 3,675 4,440 3,285 3,000 3,716 3,800 800 26.67% 101-45210-092 092 Soft Drinks For Resale 3,355 3,355 3,867 3,200 3,353 3,600 400 12.50% 101-45210-093 093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl 1,205 0 29 1,500 1,161 1,500 0 0.00% 101-45210-094 094 Concessions For Resale-NonTax 1,020 2,821 2,085 1,000 1,132 2,500 1,500 150.00% 101-45210-095 095 Pro Shop Items For Resale 3,450 3,187 1,846 2,000 1,808 2,500 500 25.00% 101-45210-099 099 Other For Resale 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Purchases for Resale 12,705 13,107 11,111 10,700 11,170 13,900 3,200 29.91% Golf Course Total 160,915 159,454 170,346 172,670 171,027 172,831 161 0.09% Page 56 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Special Services -Consulting & Police 43280 Dollar 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 178,075 103,456 123,018 95,750 122,135 95,750 0 0.00% Page 57 Personal Services 101-43280-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 42,265 29,115 24,210 35,000 28,609 35,000 0 0.00% 101-43280-121 121 PERA 5,986 3,989 2,252 5,250 3,111 5,250 0 0.00% 101-43280-122 122 FICA 544 376 319 500 363 500 0 0.00% 101-43280-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 17 4 4 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Personal Services 48,813 33,485 26,784 40,750 32,083 40,750 0 0.00% Professional Services 101-43280-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 62,254 48,859 73,173 45,000 83,002 45,000 0 0.00% 101-43280-307 307 Legal -Consulting 25,959 21,112 23,061 10,000 7,051 10,000 0 0.00% 101-43280-319 319 Professional Services 41,049 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101-43280-800 800 Special Projects, Contingency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 129,262 69,971 96,234 55,000 90,052 55,000 0 0.00% Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 178,075 103,456 123,018 95,750 122,135 95,750 0 0.00% Page 57 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono General Fund Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Special Projects -Contingencies 43290 Dollar % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Nov 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Capital & Transfers Personal Services 101-43290-510 510 Land 101-43290-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 679,000 Total Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 Professional Services 375,639 380,000 5,000 1.33% Contingency Items 101-43290-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 0 0 0 408 0 0 N/A 101-43290-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 Total Professional Services 0 0 0 0 408 0 0 N/A (35,990) Other Expenses GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,320,435 7,565,334 6,987,717 7,988,364 7,081,847 8,193,114 204,749 101-43290-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Capital & Transfers 101-43290-510 510 Land 0 0 0 0 639 0 0 N/A 101-43290-720 720 Operating Transfers 506,548 679,000 0 375,000 375,000 380,000 5,000 1.33% Total Capital & Transfers 506,548 679,000 0 375,000 375,639 380,000 5,000 1.33% Contingency Items 101-43290-800 800 Special Projects, Contingency 45,001 24,500 8,004 40,990 56,357 0 (40,990) -100.00% Total Contingency Items 45,001 24,500 8,004 40,990 56,357 0 (40,990) -100.00% Special Projects -Contingencies Total 551,549 703,500 8,004 415,990 432,404 380,000 (35,990) -8.65% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,320,435 7,565,334 6,987,717 7,988,364 7,081,847 8,193,114 204,749 2.56% Page 58 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Water 49400 Total Personal Services 163,416 175,510 182,150 137,738 185,737 3,587 1.97% Personal Services 601-49400-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 601-49400-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 601-49400-103 103 Part -Time Employees 601-49400-121 121 PERA 601-49400-122 122 FICA 601-49400-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 601-49400-143 143 OPEB Expense 601-49400-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Total Personal Services 163,416 175,510 182,150 137,738 185,737 3,587 1.97% Supplies & Maintenance Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 99,843 116,806 114,240 82,945 115,441 1,201 1.05% 12,418 9,971 10,000 10,528 10,000 0 0.00% 10,684 9,749 11,260 8,678 11,594 334 2.97% 9,168 9,975 10,160 7,587 10,277 117 1.15% 9,778 10,209 10,370 7,644 10,483 113 1.09% 14,877 15,130 21,680 17,026 21,676 (4) -0.02% 0 0 0 0 11800 1,800 N/A 6,647 3,670 4,440 3,330 4,466 26 0.59% Total Personal Services 163,416 175,510 182,150 137,738 185,737 3,587 1.97% Total Supplies & Maintenance 108,601 130,866 139,700 97,040 148,700 9,000 6.44% Page 59 Supplies & Maintenance 601-49400-201 201 Office supplies 299 0 200 0 200 0 0.00% 601-49400-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 3,894 0 4,500 0 4,500 0 0.00% 601-49400-216 216 Chemicals and Chem Products 15,577 32,417 35,000 26,548 35,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 226 68 0 272 0 0 N/A 601-49400-222 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 0 0 1,000 23 1,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 129 336 200 1,233 200 0 0.00% 601-49400-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 872 699 1,000 296 1,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-227 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 34,509 15,283 35,000 17,380 35,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 2,473 2,049 2,000 398 2,500 500 25.00% 601-49400-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 1,532 0 2,300 0 2,300 0 0.00% 601-49400-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 0 688 0 1,271 0 0 N/A 601-49400-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 6,487 7,030 3,500 300 7,000 3,500 100.00% 601-49400-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 3,477 4,080 0 16,727 4,000 4,000 N/A 601-49400-405 405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant 36,876 61,534 51,000 29,620 51,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-416 416 Software Licensing 2,250 6,682 4,000 2,972 5,000 1,000 25.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 108,601 130,866 139,700 97,040 148,700 9,000 6.44% Page 59 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Water cont. 49400 Total Insurances 10,280 10,280 10,280 7,710 10,280 0 0.00% Page 60 Insurances Dollar % 601-49400-361 361 General Liability Ins 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 601-49400-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 601-49400-366 Professional Services 3,800 3,800 3,800 21850 3,800 0 0.00% 601-49400-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 4,000 5,775 4,500 0 5,000 500 11.11% 601-49400-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 25,915 22,801 15,000 5,471 15,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-307 307 Legal -Consulting 977 21891 1,500 2,430 2,000 500 33.33% 601-49400-312 312 Bank Fees 2,307 2,473 1,200 941 2,400 1,200 100.00% 601-49400-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 500 2,410 500 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 33,198 33,939 22,700 11,251 24,900 2,200 9.69% Total Insurances 10,280 10,280 10,280 7,710 10,280 0 0.00% Page 60 Insurances 601-49400-361 361 General Liability Ins 4,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 4,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,350 1,800 0 0.00% 601-49400-366 366 Property Insurance 3,800 3,800 3,800 21850 3,800 0 0.00% 601-49400-367 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 380 380 380 285 380 0 0.00% 601-49400-368 368 Automotive Insurance 300 300 300 225 300 0 0.00% Total Insurances 10,280 10,280 10,280 7,710 10,280 0 0.00% Page 60 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Water cont. 49400 Total Operating Expenses 532,465 600,752 609,630 337,406 635,217 25,587 4.20% Non -Operating Expenses Dollar % 0 (1,486) 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 0 0 Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 55,000 Other Expenses 55,000 0 0.00% Total Non -Operating Expenses 158,000 53,514 55,000 601-49400-321 321 Telephone 2,232 2,046 3,000 11820 2,500 (500) -16.67% 601-49400-322 322 Postage 304 358 350 581 350 0 0.00% 601-49400-340 340 General Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 601-49400-352 352 Printing & Publishing 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-381 381 Gas & Electric 66,119 60,251 73,000 51,224 73,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-382 382 Water Utilities 810 1,393 1,100 0 1,100 0 0.00% 601-49400-387 387 Intergovernmental Services 29,127 25,171 30,000 10,738 30,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-409 409 Depreciation & Amortization 92,630 133,177 120,000 0 130,000 10,000 8.33% 601-49400-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 0 0 200 0 0 (200) -100.00% 601-49400-433 433 Memberships 437 596 650 455 650 0 0.00% 601-49400-437 437 Training & Development 2,319 2,878 3,500 3,010 3,500 0 0.00% 601-49400-438 438 Administrative Charge 15,923 16,000 16,000 12,000 16,000 0 0.00% 601-49400-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 3,554 3,011 2,000 11455 3,500 1,500 75.00% 601-49400-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 3,515 5,275 4,000 2,384 4,000 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 216,969 250,157 254,800 83,666 265,600 10,800 4.24% Total Operating Expenses 532,465 600,752 609,630 337,406 635,217 25,587 4.20% Non -Operating Expenses 601-49400-612 612 Other Long -Term Oblig Interest 0 (1,486) 0 0 0 0 N/A 601-49400-613 613 Other Interest Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 601-49400-720 720 Operating Transfers 158,000 55,000 55,000 0 55,000 0 0.00% Total Non -Operating Expenses 158,000 53,514 55,000 0 55,000 0 0.00% Total Water Fund 690,465 654,266 664,630 337,406 690,217 25,587 3.85% Page 61 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Sewer 49450 Total Personal Services Personal Services 602-49450-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 602-49450-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 602-49450-103 103 Part -Time Employees 602-49450-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 602-49450-121 121 PERA 602-49450-122 122 FICA 602-49450-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 602-49450-143 143 OPEB Expense 602-49450-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Total Personal Services 267,439 297,915 309,360 236,184 315,394 6,034 1.95% Supplies & Maintenance Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 169,084 190,246 190,220 146,297 192,415 2,195 1.15% 16,852 18,766 12,000 15,405 12,000 0 0.00% 10,684 9,749 11,260 8,678 11,594 334 2.97% 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 0.00% 14,496 16,018 16,010 12,778 16,200 190 1.19% 14,524 16,053 17,100 12,786 17,290 190 1.11% 31,993 34,873 36,580 28,096 37,379 799 2.18% 0 0 0 0 21200 2,200 N/A 9,805 12,210 16,190 12,143 16,316 126 0.78% 267,439 297,915 309,360 236,184 315,394 6,034 1.95% Page 62 Supplies & Maintenance 602-49450-201 201 Office supplies 142 387 400 0 400 0 0.00% 602-49450-212 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 9,066 0 9,000 0 9,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 48 1,946 1,500 410 1,500 0 0.00% 602-49450-222 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 494 328 2,500 0 2,500 0 0.00% 602-49450-223 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 0 424 0 3,295 0 0 N/A 602-49450-226 226 Clothing & personal equipment 886 867 1,000 2,519 1,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-227 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 3,586 1,457 9,000 31936 9,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 2,299 2,024 2,500 366 2,500 0 0.00% 602-49450-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 2,342 2,392 3,050 51,056 3,050 0 0.00% 602-49450-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 225 5,356 1,500 5,545 3,000 1,500 100.00% 602-49450-403 403 Repairs/Maint-Mise. Equip 5,031 5,119 4,500 1,629 5,000 500 11.11% 602-49450-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 5,467 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 602-49450-406 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 78,451 151,267 76,500 79,962 89,720 13,220 17.28% 602-49450-443 443 Repairs/Maint-I&I Reduction 280 17,616 25,000 33,425 25,000 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 108,316 189,183 137,950 182,142 153,170 15,220 11.03% Page 62 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Page 63 Professional Services 602-49450-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 6,000 7,000 6,500 0 6,500 0 0.00% 602-49450-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 10,543 17,498 15,000 51080 15,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-307 307 Legal -Consulting 266 3,689 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-312 312 Bank Fees 2,307 3,308 3,000 11904 3,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 288 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 19,115 31,494 25,500 7,272 25,500 0 0.00% Page 63 Insurances 602-49450-361 361 General Liability Ins 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 8,000 0 0.00% 602-49450-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,700 3,600 0 0.00% 602-49450-366 366 Property Insurance 3,200 3,200 3,200 2,400 3,200 0 0.00% 602-49450-367 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 1,230 1,230 1,230 923 1,230 0 0.00% 602-49450-368 368 Automotive Insurance 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,175 2,900 0 0.00% Total Insurances 18,930 18,930 18,930 14,198 18,930 0 0.00% Page 63 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 Total Other Expenses 603,065 823,599 878,090 392,587 935,719 57,629 6.56% Total Operating Expenses 1,016,864 1,361,122 1,369,830 832,382 1,448,713 78,883 5.76% Page 64 Other Expenses 602-49450-321 321 Telephone 602-49450-322 322 Postage 602-49450-331 331 Travel Expenses 602-49450-340 340 General Advertising 602-49450-352 352 Printing & Publishing 602-49450-381 381 Gas & Electric 602-49450-382 382 Water Utilities 602-49450-383 383 MCES-Sewer 602-49450-387 387 Intergovernmental Services 602-49450-409 409 Depreciation & Amortization 602-49450-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 602-49450-416 416 Software Licensing 602-49450-433 433 Memberships 602-49450-437 437 Training & Development 602-49450-438 438 Administrative Charge 602-49450-439 439 Meeting Expenses 602-49450-440 440 Special Equipment Replacement 602-49450-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 602-49450-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total Other Expenses 603,065 823,599 878,090 392,587 935,719 57,629 6.56% Total Operating Expenses 1,016,864 1,361,122 1,369,830 832,382 1,448,713 78,883 5.76% Page 64 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 2,888 2,953 5,000 3,302 5,000 0 0.00% 1,569 1,787 1,500 1,200 1,600 100 6.67% 0 0 100 0 100 0 0.00% 0 0 300 0 300 0 0.00% 0 0 0 704 0 0 N/A 27,651 28,320 40,000 10,871 35,000 (5,000) -12.50% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 487,307 395,680 431,940 323,956 473,217 41,277 9.56% 44,445 36,005 45,000 21,412 45,000 0 0.00% 175 311,135 305,000 0 320,000 15,000 4.92% 0 347 2,500 0 2,500 0 0.00% 700 7,198 4,500 3,457 10,752 6,252 138.93% 0 155 1,250 63 1,250 0 0.00% 2,455 4,679 4,500 1,470 4,500 0 0.00% 32,000 32,000 32,000 24,000 32,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 392 417 1,000 23 1,000 0 0.00% 3,484 2,923 3,500 2,130 3,500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 603,065 823,599 878,090 392,587 935,719 57,629 6.56% Total Operating Expenses 1,016,864 1,361,122 1,369,830 832,382 1,448,713 78,883 5.76% Page 64 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 602-49450-613 602-49450-720 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Non -Operating Expenses 613 Other Interest Expense 0 0 0 720 Operating Transfers 113,575 100,000 110,000 Total Non -Operating Expenses 113,575 100,000 110,000 Total Sewer Fund 1,130,439 1,461,122 1,479,830 0 0 0 N/A 0 110,000 0 0.00% 0 110,000 832,382 1,558,713 0 0.00% 78,883 5.33% Page 65 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Recycling 49500 Page 66 Supplies & Maintenance Dollar % 603-49500-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 603-49500-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 1,532 0 1,000 0 1,500 500 50.00% 603-49500-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 4,650 3,488 5,900 0 6,030 130 2.20% 603-49500-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-103 103 Part -Time Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-104 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-121 121 PERA 336 252 440 0 450 10 2.27% 603-49500-122 122 FICA 356 267 450 0 460 10 2.22% 603-49500-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 32 30 40 0 40 0 0.00% Total Personal Services 5,374 4,037 6,830 0 6,980 150 2.20% Page 66 Supplies & Maintenance 603-49500-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 0 1,695 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 1,532 0 1,000 0 1,500 500 50.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 1,532 0 1,000 0 1,500 500 50.00% Professional Services 603-49500-316 316 Contract Recycling Pickup 104,674 101,942 110,500 0 115,000 4,500 4.07% 603-49500-319 319 Professional Services 0 1,301 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 104,674 103,243 110,500 0 115,000 4,500 4.07% Page 66 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Recycling cont. 49500 Page 67 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 603-49500-352 352 Printing & Publishing 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 603-49500-361 361 General Liability Ins 0 125 500 0 500 0 0.00% 603-49500-438 438 Administrative Charge 2,500 625 2,500 0 2,500 0 0.00% 603-49500-442 442 Spring, FaII,X-mas Cleanup 2,526 0 3,670 1,590 3,670 0 0.00% 603-49500-444 444 Organics Recycling 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 5,026 750 6,670 1,590 6,670 0 0.00% Recycling Total 116,606 108,030 125,000 1,590 130,150 5,150 4.12% Page 67 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Storm Water 49910 Page 68 Dollar 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Personal Services 651-49910-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 43,775 35,017 35,670 26,373 36,562 892 2.50% 651-49910-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 453 1,115 0 96 0 0 N/A 651-49910-121 121 PERA 3,137 2,534 2,680 1,985 2,747 67 2.50% 651-49910-122 122 FICA 3,287 2,611 2,730 2,070 2,798 68 2.49% 651-49910-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 21952 2,752 5,250 2,789 5,381 131 2.50% 651-49910-143 143 OPEB Expense 0 0 0 0 530 530 N/A 651-49910-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 809 870 1,050 788 1,076 26 2.48% Total Personal Services 54,413 44,900 47,380 34,100 49,094 1,714 3.62% Supplies & Maintenance 651-49910-201 201 Office supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-221 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 0 0 0 0 1,300 1,300 N/A 651-49910-227 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 17,128 10,020 9,500 657 9,500 0 0.00% 651-49910-240 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 72 4,278 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 1,370 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 651-49910-402 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 135 875 4,000 31768 4,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-404 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 390 27,682 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-406 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 0 1,821 14,000 14 14,000 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 19,095 44,676 30,000 4,439 31,300 1,300 4.33% Page 68 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Storm Water cont. 49910 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Page 69 Professional Services 651-49910-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 2,725 3,500 3,500 0 3,500 0 0.00% 651-49910-304 304 Engineering -Consulting 35,211 13,470 15,000 34,686 15,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-307 307 Legal -Consulting 811 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-319 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 38,747 16,970 19,500 34,686 19,500 0 0.00% Insurances 651-49910-361 361 General Liability Ins 500 500 500 375 500 0 0.00% 651-49910-362 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 220 220 220 165 220 0 0.00% 651-49910-367 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 0 1,250 1,250 938 1,250 0 0.00% 651-49910-370 370 Insurance Agent of Record 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-379 379 Insurance Deductibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Insurances 720 1,970 1,970 1,478 1,970 0 0.00% Page 69 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Storm Water cont. 49910 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease Page 70 Other Expenses 651-49910-322 322 Postage 1,569 1,532 1,700 1,200 1,700 0 0.00% 651-49910-331 331 Travel Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-352 352 Printing & Publishing 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-409 409 Depreciation & Amortization 32,465 35,817 31,000 0 38,000 7,000 22.58% 651-49910-415 415 Other Equipment Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-416 416 Software Licensing 0 6,518 4,000 2,052 4,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-433 433 Memberships 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-437 437 Training & Development 0 310 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-438 438 Administrative Charge 16,000 16,000 16,000 12,000 16,000 0 0.00% 651-49910-441 441 Licenses & Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-489 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 50,034 60,177 52,700 15,252 59,700 7,000 13.28% Total Operating Expenses 163,009 168,694 151,550 89,953 161,564 10,014 6.61% Non -Operating Expenses 651-49910-513 513 Easements & Rights of Way 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 651-49910-592 592 Storm Sewer Utility Const 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Non -Operating Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Stormwater Fund 163,009 168,694 151,550 89,953 161,564 10,014 6.61% Page 70 City of Orono - 2018 Budget City of Orono Enterprise Line Item 2018 Line Item Budget Cable Franchise 49840 Total Personal Services 11,831 8,899 13,660 8,968 30,415 16,755 122.66% Professional Services 614-49840-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 1,625 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 0.00% 614-49840-307 307 Legal -Consulting 0 0 500 0 0 (500) -100.00% 614-49840-319 319 Professional Services 1,760 1,465 2,000 21555 0 (2,000) -100.00% Total Professional Services 3,385 1,465 4,500 2,555 2,000 (2,500) -55.56% Other Expenses Dollar % 614-49840-329 329 Internet/Other Communications 2015 2016 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Increase Increase 614-49840-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip Actual Actual Budget Sep 30, 2017 Draft Budget Decrease Decrease 614-49840-409 Personal Services 4,314 4,314 4,600 0 4,600 0 0.00% 614-49840-101 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 10,248 7,686 11,800 7,700 28,440 16,640 141.02% 614-49840-102 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 614-49840-121 121 PERA 740 555 880 660 935 55 6.25% 614-49840-122 122 FICA 784 588 900 548 954 54 6.00% 614-49840-135 135 City Benefit Contribution 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 614-49840-151 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 59 70 80 60 86 6 7.50% Total Personal Services 11,831 8,899 13,660 8,968 30,415 16,755 122.66% Professional Services 614-49840-301 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 1,625 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 0.00% 614-49840-307 307 Legal -Consulting 0 0 500 0 0 (500) -100.00% 614-49840-319 319 Professional Services 1,760 1,465 2,000 21555 0 (2,000) -100.00% Total Professional Services 3,385 1,465 4,500 2,555 2,000 (2,500) -55.56% Total Other Expenses 15,913 22,516 22,600 10,828 29,100 6,500 28.76% Total Operating Expenses 31,129 32,880 40,760 22,350 61,515 20,755 50.92% Total Cable TV Fund 31,129 32,880 40,760 22,350 61,515 20,755 50.92% Page 71 Other Expenses 614-49840-329 329 Internet/Other Communications 9,099 13,728 15,000 7,968 20,000 5,000 33.33% 614-49840-401 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 0 1,974 500 985 2,000 1,500 300.00% 614-49840-409 409 Depreciation & Amortization 4,314 4,314 4,600 0 4,600 0 0.00% 614-49840-438 438 Administrative Charge 2,500 2,500 2,500 1,875 2,500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 15,913 22,516 22,600 10,828 29,100 6,500 28.76% Total Operating Expenses 31,129 32,880 40,760 22,350 61,515 20,755 50.92% Total Cable TV Fund 31,129 32,880 40,760 22,350 61,515 20,755 50.92% Page 71 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following people present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Richard Crosby, III, Wendy Dankey, and Aaron Printup. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Melanie Curtis, Finance Director Ron Olson, City Engineer/Public Works Director Adam Edwards, Consulting City Engineer David Martini, City Attorney Soren Mattick, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA Item No. 11 was added to the Consent Agenda. Item No. 7 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Walsh noted as part of Item No. 4, Claims/Bills, the following individuals will be reimbursed their building permit escrows: Charles Cudd, David Gutermuth, Gina Paulucci, Adam Nafstad, Swanson Homes, and Greg Blasko. 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2017 3. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2017 4. CLAIMSBILLS 5. APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTANT 6. 2018 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS 7. #17-3970 — PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 209 WALTERS PORTS LANE, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 6811 This item was removed from the Consent Agenda. 11. NON -WAIVER OF TORT LIMITS Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS John Stavig, 780 North Brown Road, stated he is looking for clarification on a couple of items. Stavig asked whether the change in language regarding recreational boating on Long Lake has been approved by Orono. Walsh indicated it was approved at the last meeting. Page 1 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued Barnhart stated the changes were made after the October meeting and are consistent with the changes made by the City of Long Lake in September. Stavig stated from his review of the matter, there did not seem to be any understanding or consideration by the City of the prior noise complaints by the residents on Long Lake. Stavig asked whether there was any public input on it. Barnhart stated there was not a formal public hearing but that the City Council asked for public comments at the meeting. Walsh stated the matter was before the City Council twice. Stavig stated he has also been attempting to find out more about the tree removal on the southern lakeshore of Long Lake and the turnback of the highway. Stavig stated to his knowledge all of the work currently going on is located in the City of Long Lake and within the easement. Stavig stated the transportation plan has as its major objectives the protection of the natural resources and environmental amenities, and then it goes on to talk about a concern over the increase in road size, particularly around County Road 15. Stavig stated he would think there would be a comparable concern with respect to Long Lake. Stavig commented he realizes the document is outdated, but it describes the area where they are working now as a wooded residential streetscape east of downtown. Stavig noted he is meeting with the Watershed District next week and has also spoken to Mn/DOT and the DNR in an attempt to understand why all the trees were removed. Stavig stated the road itself was not widened in that area but yet every tree was removed for over a quarter of a mile. Stavig stated he realizes there were a number of hearings regarding the street lights and traffic flow for the businesses but there was no mention of the removal of the trees. Stavig asked whether the removal of the trees is consistent with the City's transportation plan and whether the City will be replanting any of those trees. Walsh stated a lot of the road design was completed a year and a half ago and the City of Orono was not involved in the design of the portion of the road in Long Lake. Walsh indicated Orono's portion starts at Old Long Lake Road and the City negotiated $75,000 to get trees replanted in that area. Walsh stated that work will not be done until the road is completed and that the majority of it was in Long Lake's streetscape plan and did not involve the City of Orono. Stavig stated the riprap goes into the lake itself and is outside the right-of-way. Edwards stated the area he is speaking about is within the City of Long Lake and not within the City of Orono and is a county right-of-way. Stavig asked whether the lake itself is within the city. Edwards indicated the work is occurring on the embankment, which will be rebuilt, which is why the trees were removed. Walsh suggested Mr. Stavig speak with Long Lake and that Orono did not have any input or make any decisions on that portion. Page 2 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued Stavig stated he would hope the lake would be a concern. Crosby commented it is, but what is happening on land in another city limits the input Orono will have. Stavig stated the work goes into the lake and is beyond the ordinary highwater level. Edwards stated the jurisdiction for the lakeshore area will primarily be the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and that it might be best if he speak directly with them. There were no further public comments. PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT 8. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD (CSAH 112-CSAH 6) DESIGN PROPOSAL Edwards reviewed his Staff report dated November 27, 2017, regarding a proposal from Bolton and Menk to commence design work for Old Crystal Bay Road. A feasibility study has been completed and the school and City have held some initial meetings regarding moving the project forward. The design work will consist of topographic surveying, preliminary design, and detail design for the reconstruction and reconfiguration of Old Crystal Bay Road between County Road 112 and County Road 6 as well as the replacement of associated water, sewer and storm water utilities. The initial design work will be completed by Bolton and Menk for a fee not to exceed $74,250. The project will be funded with a combination of Municipal State Aid and the respective utility funds. The project is anticipated to commence in June of 2018. David Martini, Consulting City Engineer, provided a project overview, noting that there are some well documented traffic issues in this area. Martini stated whenever there are activities at the school, including the morning drop-off, traffic issues develop all the way up to County Road 6, and in order to better understand the issues, previous studies and plans have been reviewed and the traffic information has been consolidated. Martini reviewed the turning movements that are currently allowed along Old Crystal Bay Road, County Road 6, and Highway 112. Martini stated they looked at a number of different options for this roadway, including a stop light, a roundabout, a rectangular rapid flashing beacon, and a pedestrian hybrid beacon. Martini stated from an existing conditions standpoint, the red dots on the overhead reflect the backups in the morning. At the present time traffic backs all the way up to County Road 6, which then causes problems on that road as well. Martini indicated the first alternative involves creating a new intersection between the two driveways to the middle school and high school. This intersection will be signalized and will operate as a full intersection with all movements allowed. During off-peak hours when traffic is significantly reduced, the signal will operate with a phasing that will prioritize the north -south movement over the east -west movement. The stoplight will concentrate the traffic more to the area of the intersection and will help reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts, prevent queues from extending into parking lots, will remove queues from through lanes, does not require expansion of the parking lot, and will expand pickup/drop-off areas for all vehicles. Some of the challenges associated with this option is Page 3 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD (CSAH 112-CSAH 6) DESIGN PROPOSAL — Continued reducing pickup/drop off areas for some vehicles, a left -turn into the parking lots, and a required parking lot reconfiguration. Alternative 2 is to replace the four-way stops with stoplights, which has basically the same benefits and challenges as the stoplight at County Road 6. Martini noted stoplights will add considerable cost to the project over a simple reconstruction and addition of turn lanes. Both options will considerably improve traffic circulation at both school campuses but Alternative 2 will better establish vehicle priority through signalization at all entrances and exits, will reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts, will prevent queues from extending into parking lots, will reduce the risk of queues overriding onto pick-up/drop-off areas, will remove queues from through lanes, offers parking lot expansion and an underpass as additional improvements, will expand pick-up/drop-off areas for all vehicles, offers better campus circulation options, and may be less expensive than Alternative 1 if the underpass and the parking lot expansion are not included. Pavement and traffic improvements would range between $1,600,000 to $1,800,000. Storm sewer improvements will run between $250,000 to $300,000, sewer replacement is estimated at $190,000, and water replacement is estimated at $210,000, for a total project cost of $2.25 to $2.5 million. Martini reviewed the proposed schedule for the project. Martini indicated he would be back in January before the City Council for a decision on the detailed design, and if approved, the plans would go out for bids in April. The project would be awarded in May and construction would commence in June of 2018. The project is anticipated to be completed by September of 2019. Walsh noted whenever sewer is replaced, the road needs to be tore up, and that this is the time to figure out what improvements should be done for the long haul. Dankey asked what the input from the school has been on the two alternatives and their internal circulation. Martini indicated he has met with the school a couple of times and that they have discussed their future improvements and possible options. Martini noted the two alternatives attempt to deal with the intersections and that other work can be done to help improve the school's internal circulation. There also is the potential for access off the west end onto Wayzata Boulevard. Martini stated all of that needs to be considered and that the alternatives are a summary of those preliminary discussions but that there is still a lot of work that needs to be done. Printup asked whether they have utilized any of the previous studies that have been completed on this road. Martini stated they have reviewed those plans. One of the options contained in those plans included roundabouts, which have been studied and determined not to be an appropriate solution on this corridor. In addition, all the traffic information was taken from work that was previously done. Martini indicated they have made good use of the investment the City has already put into this corridor and that they have not started from scratch. Page 4 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD (CSAH 112-CSAH 6) DESIGN PROPOSAL — Continued Edwards noted they also reviewed the work completed by the school on the corridor and used some of that information. Printup asked what the infrastructure is like underneath the road. Edwards stated on the southern half of the corridor, the water and sewers pipes were installed in the 1960- 1970 era and consist of cast iron for the water piping and clay piping for the sewer. Both have limited life spans. Edwards stated they have noticed in this area issues with the soils interacting with the pipes causing them to decay and fall apart, which has resulted in a number of water main repairs at a higher than expected rate. The clay piping for the sanitary sewer is prone to inflow and infiltration as well as roots and other things, which causes the piping to break fairly easily. Edwards indicated the water main will likely be a complete replacement and that they will look at different options on the sewer line, such as complete replacement or cured -in-place lining. Edwards stated if the asphalt is torn up, that is the time to replace everything. Martini stated the first piece to finalizing this project is to authorize Bolton and Menk to design the proj ect. Walsh stated the City cannot do anything until the plans are finalized, which is step one in this process, and that the construction will probably take place over two school seasons. Edwards stated the project will likely be done in two phases, with the majority of the work occurring during the summer breaks. There were no public comments regarding this item. Dankey moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Bolton and Menk to commence design of the Old Crystal Bay Road for an estimated fee of $247,500, with the initial design work to be completed for a fee not to exceed $74,250. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 9. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Edwards reviewed the 2018 Parks Capital Improvement Plan, including the results of the golf course mini master plan. Two main changes from previous years' CIP is the golf course capital improvement plan and the parks capital improvement plan have been combined and all equipment has been consolidated on the document. Edwards indicated the golf course plan was completed by Bolton and Menk based on guidance from the Park Commission and the subcommittee. The group looked at a number of possible improvements at the golf course, including broadening the use of the golf course. Other additions to the Parks CIp include basketball court surfacing at Navarre, Crystal Bay, and Hackberry Park. Rough cost estimates have been provided on the various items. Edwards stated he is looking to get the feedback of the City Council on the CIP. Page 5 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 9. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN — Continued Rick Meyers, Park Commission Chair, stated the Park Commission attempted to look at the golf course more globally and that the plan includes some projects that would help enhance use of the golf course beyond just golfing. The subcommittee looked at other golf courses in the area to see what they do during the wintertime and other times of the years. The capital improvement plan provides an outline of what can be done at the golf course and is not a firm commitment to any one project. Each individual project would be discussed in-depth prior to proceeding forward with it. Meyers stated the intent was to look at what is needed to help make the golf course better and then to look at expanding the activities. Walsh stated the City reinstituted the Park Commission after a period of inactivity and that the main goal is to improve the City parks. A number of improvements have already been made to the parks, including the creation of a dog park at Lurton Park. Walsh stated the Orono Golf Course is a community asset and helps keep people in the community. Walsh stated the clubhouse could become a little community center that helps bring people together similar to Lurton Park. Dankey commented she loves the winter activity concept at the golf course. Dankey asked if there is an area that could be flooded for an ice rink. Meyers indicated there is not at the present time but that is a possibility at some point in the future. Meyers stated the Park Commission is interested in seeing what the residents want at the parks and that the CIP is a starting point. Walsh noted the Park Commission is also looking at resurfacing some of the basketball courts. Meyers stated the plan will allow the City to apply for grants and other funding. Jane Delaney, 1315 Wooddale Avenue, stated she is here because she would like to provide some insight about what has gone on historically at the golf course. Stay the Course was started in the winter of 2012, which helped increase the number of volunteers helping out at the golf course. Delaney stated the neighbors and residents are excited that the City is willing to look at putting some money back into the golf course and that she would like to form a committee to provide some additional input and be involved in the process. Walsh suggested she get in contact with Rick Meyers. Walsh stated the City is always interested in obtaining the input of the residents. Delaney noted she included her phone number in the letter she submitted. Crosby commented he is interested in adding winter activities and expanding the use of the golf course. Delaney stated in years past there were cross-country skiing and groomed trails that were lit with candles. Delaney indicated she also worked there when a lot of the events took place, such as small corporate parties and snow tubing. Delaney stated there are a lot of possibilities. Dankey indicated she also is in agreement with improving the basketball courts, especially at the Navarre park. Page 6 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 9. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN — Continued Printup stated he is a little hesitate about the trails given the number of other trails in the city and that he is not in favor of the boat for Big Island. Edwards indicated the City might have an option to partner on a boat with a sister city. Printup stated in his view the CIP is not over the top and that it would be nice to have some winter activities out at the golf course. The City Council took no formal action on this item. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 7. #17-3970 — PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 209 WALTERS PORTS LANE, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 6811 Printup stated his main point with the application is that there appears to be a pretty big difference between what was presented at the Planning Commission and what is now being proposed. Printup noted the Planning Commission appears to be supportive of this plan based on their past comments. Walsh stated he would like to understand what has changed from the last meeting to today. Curtis stated following the feedback received at the Planning Commission regarding all of their applications, the applicants took a step back and looked at their primary goal, which is to construct the addition onto their home. Curtis stated while the applicants have bigger plans for the property, they are now focused on the addition and have removed their plans for the third lot at this point. Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to basically maintain a Pence Lane driveway, a Walters Port driveway, and a Walters Port address. The addition will require a variance to the 75 -foot setback and the average lakeshore setback, which will now be determined by the Hueller's home on the east and the house to the north. That setback line is completely behind the applicant's home, so therefore the addition is completely ahead of it. In addition, the applicants will be submitting a restoration plan to address the work that was done in the 0-75 to remove vegetation. The retaining walls in that area are no longer being proposed. There is 130 square feet of additional structure within the 0-75 foot setback, which is the connection between the existing home and the addition. The applicants will also be enclosing the area where there is a hot tub and a deck. Curtis noted the addition will be primarily behind the 75 -foot setback. Walsh stated he understands the issues with the connection and the hardship associated with that. Crosby asked if the applicants will be maintaining their Walters Port address. Curtis indicated they will be. Crosby asked if they will be selling off a portion of the second lot. Page 7 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 7. #17-3970 — PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 209 WALTERS PORTS LANE, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 6811— Continued Curtis stated if the applicants decide to create another lot, it will be an actual subdivision, with notice being given to the neighbors. Originally the applicants were attempting to move the lot line, which is a subdivision exemption, but it required variances and Council review. Walsh asked if the property will be replatted as one lot. Curtis indicated it will be one PID but that they are not abandoning the driveway off of Walters Port. The applicants do have the option to change their address to Pence Lane in the future if they choose to. Dankey asked if the new addition will cut off anyone's view of the lake. Curtis stated it is her belief it will not due to the configuration of the land in that area. Curtis pointed out the average lakeshore setback line is through the back of the lot and that she is not sure at this point what view the Keegans have over the Dunkley property. Curtis noted she did speak with Mrs. Keegan earlier in the day and that they are aware of the meeting tonight along with the Huellers. Crosby noted he will be recusing himself from voting on this application since the Dunkleys are a client at his place of employment. Dankey asked if the house is still on the other lot. Curtis indicated it was removed this summer. Crosby stated his only concern would be to keep the turnaround for emergency vehicles regardless of it being a Walters Port access or a Pence Lane access. Curtis stated the applicants have not finalized their internal driveway at this point. Barnhart stated that condition would need to be linked to the variance in some fashion and that those two roads are not proposed to be connected at this point. Curtis stated the applicants are proposing some type of reconfiguration and will be maintaining portions of the Pence Lane connection but the turnaround is the applicants' private driveway area. Dankey asked if the property could be subdivided at some point. Curtis indicated it can be since the property consists of four acres and it is in a 1 -acre zone. Printup moved, Dankey seconded, Application No. 17-3970, Paul Vogstrom on behalf of William and Sue Dunkley, 2709 Walters Port Lane, granting of variances to the 75 -foot lake setback, the average lakeshore setback, and hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0, Crosby Abstained. Page 8 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10. APPROVE TEMPORARY SITE PLAN FOR RIVER VALLEY SPORTS — USE OF A TENT FOR SALES DISPLAY Barnhart reviewed his Staff report dated November 27, 2017, regarding a proposal from River Valley Sports to erect a tent for three months from January 119, 2018, to March 19, 201, to accommodate boat show sales and display. River Valley Sports is located at 1444 Shoreline Drive and operates as a marine based sales and service business. The applicant is proposing to erect a 39' x 82' heated tent in the parking lot located to the north of the existing sales and service building. The applicant is able to meet the additional parking requirements. Staff recommends approval of the temporary site plan/special event permit subject to the conditions outlined in Staff report. Dankey asked if the City is obligated to approve it in subsequent years if it is approved this year. Barnhart stated the City would not be obligated to approve it every year since conditions may change, but that if it becomes a regular request by people or businesses in the City, he would recommend addressing it with a code or ordinance change. Walsh commented this type of proposal can become a slippery slope and that it intensifies the use on the site. Walsh noted the City has a three-day special event permit but not a two or three-month special event permit. Walsh commented he is not a big fan of intensifying a site that really should not be intensified given the past issues with the lot. Barnhart noted there are currently two businesses operating on this site; one being the Your Boat Club and the other being River Valley Sports, which is requesting the special permit for what is considered to be a permitted use. Crosby asked about the residential house to the north. Barnhart indicated there are two residential properties to the north that are not part of this request and that one of the properties is used for overflow parking. Walsh stated as it relates to intensification, when a property is located in a residential district, there are certain expectations that go along with what is allowed there, and that this could lead to any number of businesses that will want tents on their property for months at a time. Barnhart stated Staff could approve a special event permit since they meet all the requirements of the permit. Barnhart stated since there is no time limit in the code, Staff felt it should be brought before the City Council to determine whether any conditions should be added to it. Walsh stated he would not be in favor of allowing it since it intensifies the use and that the residents had no expectation that this would occur on the property. Barnhart noted it is a permitted use in this zoning district and that the residential properties are located in a different zoning district. Barnhart stated he does not understand what the expectations are of the residents and that Staff is asking the City Council to approve this subject to the six conditions outlined in Staff report. Page 9 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10. APPROVE TEMPORARY SITE PLAN FOR RIVER VALLEY SPORTS — USE OF A TENT FOR SALES DISPLAY — Continued Mattick stated he would like to review the Conditional Use Permit and that he does not know at this time whether this would constitute an expansion. Mattick noted the City Council is allowed to attach reasonable conditions to the special event permit, and while the code does not contemplate the length of a special event, that could be discussed by the City Council and a limit placed on it since that would be a reasonable condition. Mattick stated he understand the idea that it may be an intensification, but the question becomes what happens if they remove the request for the tent and simply do outdoor sales. Mattick noted that would be allowed. Walsh stated they could do it that way but that in his view the issue relates to the intensification. Barnhart stated Staff can address those issues and bring it back. Walsh indicated that would be his preference. Crosby stated he would also like to hear from the business owner. Barnhart requested the City Council table the request until December 11. Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to table the request for site plan approval submitted by River Valley Sports for the use of a temporary tent for sales display, subject to the six conditions outlined in Staff s report. Matt Johnson, 1432 Shoreline Drive, stated to his understanding these are not two separate entities and that they all operate under EOF. Johnson stated part of the reason for that relationship is the shared parking on the site. Johnson stated if EOF is separate from the marina and River Valley, they would be covering up their 19 parking spots with the tent. The only way for the parking to then work is for the two businesses to be combined. Johnson noted there is also a residentially zoned building that is inhabitable that they rent out and it appears they are improving the other residentially zoned property for possible rental. Johnson stated in his view the City Council cannot look at each one of these businesses separately because they share the parking. Johnson asked what decibels the heaters put out. Barnhart indicated he does not have that information. Johnson commented that might be something worth looking into since there have been noise ordinance violations in the past on this site. Johnson noted the information submitted by the applicant does not contain any reference to the decibels. Walsh stated he would be interested in a detailed site plan depicting the parking to ensure the parking is correct. Johnson stated a detailed parking plan does not exist and that the parking should be specifically identified. In addition, the City Council should factor in that there are residential homes utilizing the same parking that is supposed to be for the marina since one house is being rented out and that it appears they are Page 10 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10. APPROVE TEMPORARY SITE PLAN FOR RIVER VALLEY SPORTS — USE OF A TENT FOR SALES DISPLAY — Continued improving the other house for rental. Johnson stated if rentals are created for the other house, that parking should also be factored in in addition to the noise level of the heaters. Walsh stated it should also be clarified which parking stalls are allocated to which business. Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to table the request for site plan approval submitted by River Valley Sports for the use of a temporary tent for sales display. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Dankey commented she hoped everyone had a Happy Thanksgiving and that they were able to enjoy time with their family and friends. Crosby stated he is looking forward to traveling to the Gulf of Mexico. Walsh stated he met Jason Brew, who just finished his Eagle Scout project a couple of weeks ago at Lurton Park. Walsh commented the dogs really enjoy the new play area. Walsh stated the City has a number of projects that could be done at the parks and that he welcomes the community involvement. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 12. FUND BALANCE TRANSFER Rief stated this item is regarding the proposed fund balance transfers from the General Fund to the Pavement Management Fund and the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund. The City Council has the option to transfer the excess balance to any fund that they deem appropriate. For the past few years those funds have been transferred to the Pavement Management Fund. Rief stated at this time Staff recommends approving a transfer of $531,642 to the Pavement Management Fund and a $20,000 transfer to the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund for human resources software. Walsh noted currently the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund is at 57.2 percent of the General Fund revenue budget. According to the City's fund balance policy, balances in excess of 50 percent are to be transferred into the Community Investment Fund, and that the transfer would allow the City to complete more road projects. Dankey moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the transfer of $531,642 to the Pavement Management Fund and a $20,000 transfer to the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CM 1610.110 IL91.1,10I o6ld 9 3103 14 1 Mattick stated he had nothing to report. Page 11 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ADJOURNMENT Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:40 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 12 of 12 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 108616 to 108693, totaling $353,384.91. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #108635 Cummins Npower LLC $48,118.91 Payment for generators for LS#7 and LS#2 #108668 Omann Contracting $181,802.54 Payment #1 for the 2017 Street Improvement Projects. #108682 THN Enterprises $ 4,300.00 Payment for removal of the docks from Big Island and transport to winter storage. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits Exhibit A. Check Register Prepared By: Jiyii Reviewed By: -Tja Approved By: -19a City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Central Services 429.46 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/11/2017 108616 345086292 101-41900-413 CH Copier Lease -Nov ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/11/2017 108616 345102768 101-42110-413 Police Copier Total 108616: ALLSTREAM/INTEGRATELECO 12/11/2017 108617 15023343 101-42110-321 Phone service ALLSTREAM/INTEGRATELECO 12/11/2017 108617 15023343 101-41900-321 Phone Service ALLSTREAM/INTEGRATELECO 12/11/2017 108617 15023343 601-49400-321 Phone Service ALLSTREAM/INTEGRATELECO 12/11/2017 108617 15023343 602-49450-321 Phone Service Total 108617: AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR 12/11/2017 108618 S100387866 101-42110-402 #241 tires AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR 12/11/2017 108618 S1008S3696 101-42110-402 tires supply Total 108618: Anderson Reda, Inc 12/11/2017 108619 2017-01453 101-22205 escrow refund/649 Ferndale Road W Total 108619: BATTERIES PLUS 12/11/2017 108620 021-104591- 601-49400-227 Mission SCADA Batteries BATTERIES PLUS 12/11/2017 108620 021-104591- 602-49450-227 Mission SCADA Batteries Total 108620: BRAUN INTERTEC 12/11/2017 108621 B106024 435-48967-304 Fox street Imp BRAUN INTERTEC 12/11/2017 108621 B109756 435-48967-304 Fox street Imp Total 108621: BUDGET PRINTING 12/11/2017 108622 5870 101-41900-201 plaque -RS Total 108622: CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/11/2017 108623 AE11292017 601-49400-437 pw manual CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/11/2017 108623 CF11212017 101-42110-404 3 phone holders&clips CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/11/2017 108623 DK USPS 101-41900-322 postage for security camera CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/11/2017 108623 DK11222017 101-45200-221 Security camera for big island CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/11/2017 108623 JB11212017 101-42400-437 Sensible Land Use Coalition- luncheon Department Invoice Amount Central Services 1,465.76 Police Department 503.63 Parks 1,969.39 Police Department 306.76 Central Services 429.46 Water 71.58 Sewer 214.72 Police Department 609.40 Police Department 2,354.54 2,963.94 2,500.00 Water 39.69 Sewer 39.69 79.38 645.25 Central Services 95.00 Water 86.40 Police Department 48.23 Central Services 14.50 Parks 539.99 Building & Zoning 116.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 108623: 805.12 CARTEGRAPH 12/11/2017 108624 SIN0003907 651-49910-416 licensing Storm Water 1,300.00 CARTEGRAPH 12/11/2017 108624 SIN0003907 601-49400-416 licensing Water 1,300.00 CARTEGRAPH 12/11/2017 108624 SIN0003907 602-49450-416 licensing Sewer 1,300.00 CARTEGRAPH 12/11/2017 108624 SIN0003907 101-41900-416 licensing Central Services 1,300.00 Total 108624: 5,200.00 CEMSTONE 12/11/2017 108625 C1855494 601-49400-405 concrete- 2345 Blaine Ave Water 456.80 Total 108625: 456.80 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 10741575-4N 602-49450-381 LS#2 generator Sewer 55.31 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 15865-1 NO 601-49400-381 Nov -Gas -10/21/17-11/19/17 Water 647.13 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 15865-1 NO 602-49450-381 Nov -Gas -10/21/17-11/19/17 Sewer 398.92 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 15865-1 NO 101-41900-381 Nov -Gas -10/21/17-11/19/17 Central Services 719.26 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 15865-1 NO 101-42110-381 Nov -Gas -10/21/17-11/19/17 Police Department 235.67 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/11/2017 108626 15865-1 NO 101-45210-381 Nov -Gas -10/21/17-11/19/17 Golf Course 128.61 Total 108626: 2,184.90 CENTURY LINK 12/11/2017 108627 9524731909 101-45210-321 GC phone 09/19 - 10/18/2017 Golf Course 201.44 Total 108627: 201.44 CHAD STENSRUD 12/11/2017 108628 11102017 101-42110-321 iphone casereimb Police Department 18.50 Total 108628: 18.50 Christopher Loveless 12/11/2017 108629 2016-00172 101-22205 escrow refund/ 3960 Bayside Road 2,500.00 Total 108629: 2,500.00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/11/2017 108630 0015246 101-42110-402 #241 oil service Police Department 596.92 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/11/2017 108630 0015250 101-42110-402 #244 oil service Police Department 45.79 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/11/2017 108630 0015255 101-42110-402 #243 oil service Police Department 42.74 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/11/2017 108630 0015265 101-42110-402 2 tires service Police Department 18.02 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Page: 3 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 108630: 703.47 CMI INC 12/11/2017 108631 8007369 101-42110-240 testing equipment Police Department 170.00 Total 108631: 170.00 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 12/11/2017 108632 171115 101-43000-224 WINTER MIX Public Works Department 1,103.89 Total 108632: 1,103.89 CORE & MAIN 12/11/2017 108633 H640324 601-49400-405 misc supplies Water 23.26 Total 108633: 23.26 CORNERHOUSE 12/11/2017 108634 SPD162018 101-42110-319 2018 Forensic Interview Svcs Police Department 2,143.22 Total 108634: 2,143.22 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 12/11/2017 108635 001-27806 602-16500 LS#7 generator sn#j170266309 31,400.00 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 12/11/2017 108635 001-27840 602-16500 LS#20 generator sn#J170270408 16,718.91 Total 108635: 48,118.91 David Weekley, Homes 12/11/2017 108636 2017-3969 101-22205 escrow refund/Orono Preserve withdrawn 700.00 Total 108636: 700.00 DUSTIN RIEF 12/11/2017 108637 08312017 101-41300-331 mileage remiburement Administration 95.77 Total 108637: 95.77 DVS RENEWAL 12/11/2017 108638 11282017 231-45650-441 2003 gmc envoy 21.75 Total 108638: 21.75 DVS RENEWAL 12/11/2017 108639 10302017 101-42110-240 #235 licence tabs Police Department 11.00 Total 108639: 11.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 12/11/2017 108640 0116077 -IN- 101-43000-224 sign post- amt due Total 108640: FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/11/2017 108641 0268222 601-49400-227 mtr flange kit FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/11/2017 108641 0268223 601-49400-227 1- 2 HP turbine meter Total 108641: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12/11/2017 108642 7110635 601-49400-489 locates GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12/11/2017 108642 7110635 602-49450-489 locates Total 108642: H & L MESABI 12/11/2017 108643 H99415 101-43000-403 Snow Plow Blades Total 108643: JACKIE YOUNG 12/11/2017 108644 12032017 101-41300-319 meeting 11/06,13,20,27/17 JACKIE YOUNG 12/11/2017 108644 12032017 101-42400-319 meeting 11/06,13,20,27/17 JACKIE YOUNG 12/11/2017 108644 12032017 101-45200-319 meeting 11/06,13,20,27/17 Total 108644: JANE SZCZEPANIK 12/11/2017 108645 11272017 101-42110-226 uniform belt Total 108645: Jon Ressler 12/11/2017 108646 2016-00121 101-22205 escrow refund 3683 North Shore Drive Total 108646: Kamish Excavating 12/11/2017 108647 2017-00702 101-22205 escrow refund/896 Old Crystal Bay Rd S Total 108647: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS 12/11/2017 108648 0168947 101-42110-403 L-3 yearly service contract Total 108648: Department Public Works Department Water Water Water Sewer Public Works Department Administration Building & Zoning Parks Police Department Police Department Page: 4 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Invoice Amount 20.00 20.00 158.65 864.70 1,023.35 152.55 152.55 305.10 1,077.00 1,077.00 380.00 190.00 165.00 735.00 52.99 52.99 10,000.00 10,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 494.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 12/11/2017 108649 265519 101-41300-437 REGIONAL MEETING -DR Total 108649: LOGIS 12/11/2017 108650 44372 101-42110-329 police records 10/17 LOGIS 12/11/2017 108650 44372 101-42110-329 internet 10/17 LOGIS 12/11/2017 108650 44372 101-41900-329 internet 10/17 LOGIS 12/11/2017 108650 44372 101-41900-329 internet 10/17 LOGIS 12/11/2017 108650 44431 101-42110-401 VPN Issue Total 108650: Lori Zappa 12/11/2017 108651 2017-3942 101-22205 escrow refund/3670 Togo Road Total 108651: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/11/2017 108652 20517641 101-42110-212 Fuels MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/11/2017 108652 20517642 101-43000-212 Diesel Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/11/2017 108652 20517648 101-42110-212 Fuel Total 108652: MEDIACOM 12/11/2017 108653 11212017 101-42110-329 internet 10-11/2017 MEDIACOM 12/11/2017 108653 11212017 614-49840-329 internet 10-11/2017 MEDIACOM 12/11/2017 108653 11212017 101-41900-329 internet 10-11/2017 Total 108653: METRO WEST INSPECTIONS S 12/11/2017 108654 1273 101-42400-310 oct/17-Inspection Services Total 108654: MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/11/2017 108655 P63887 101-43000-226 safety gearf/Brandon Total 108655: MINUTEMAN PRESS 12/11/2017 108656 20691 101-41900-352 fall newsletter Total 108656: Department Administration Police Department Police Department Central Services Central Services Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Police Department Police Department Cable Franchise Central Services Building & Zoning Public Works Department Central Services Page: 5 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Invoice Amount 6,499.00 198.00 198.00 oqr nn 2,500.00 2,500.00 806.34 243.46 1,553.65 2,603.45 593.50 1,187.00 593.50 2,374.00 8,665.50 8,665.50 168.90 168.90 687.26 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LL 12/11/2017 108657 1010752 602-49450-403 LS#14 service Sewer 347.40 Total 108657: 347.40 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 12/11/2017 108658 2017-201074 101-43000-433 Tree Care registry DJ Goman-20107415-Jan-Dec 2 Public Works Department 25.00 Total 108658: 25.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUST 12/11/2017 108659 ABR0175494 601-49400-403 pressure vessel Water 20.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUST 12/11/2017 108659 ABR0175495 601-49400-403 pressure vessel Water 10.00 Total 108659: 30.00 MN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 12/11/2017 108660 67321217 101-21710 Pera life 12/2017 224.00 Total 108660: 224.00 MOUND TRUE VALUE 12/11/2017 108661 148853 101-42110-221 dept supplies Police Department 45.33 Total 108661: 45.33 MTI DIST CO 12/11/2017 108662 1146681-00 101-45210-404 winterization -irrigation system Golf Course 907.46 Total 108662: 907.46 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/11/2017 108663 307120 602-49450-227 9v batteries Sewer 5.99 Total 108663: 5.99 NORTON HOMES 12/11/2017 108664 2016-00821 101-22205 escrow refund -4235 Lakeview Court 2,500.00 Total 108664: 2,500.00 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 546 12/11/2017 108665 10312017 101-42110-402 car wash Police Department 115.50 Total 108665: 115.50 0 SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 12/11/2017 108666 10312017 101-42110-402 car washes Police Department 104.85 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Total 108666: 66.61 Central Services 213.99 Central Services 46.23 OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9782883320 101-42110-201 pd/office supplies OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9782884890 101-42110-201 pd/office supplies OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9806289440 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9806298400 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 98144521100 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9814452700 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9814452710 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 98299911600 101-42110-201 pd/notebooks OFFICE DEPOT 12/11/2017 108667 9829991690 101-42110-201 pd/office supplies Total 108667: 12/11/2017 108673 1241681 3 101-45210-404 Trash Service 9/2017 OMANN CONTRACTING COMPA 12/11/2017 108668 PR 1 2017 S 435-48966-590 2017 street imp OMANN CONTRACTING COMPA 12/11/2017 108668 PR 1 2017 S 435-48966-590 2017 street imp Total 108668 Pavers4Fundraising 12/11/2017 108669 11202017 234-45680-404 Orono Engraving on walk way Total 108669: 66.61 Central Services 213.99 Central Services 46.23 Peter Schwarzkopf 12/11/2017 108670 2017-01029 101-22205 escrow refund -4240 North Shore Drive Total 108670: 17.19 Police Department 37.74 Public Works Department 997.00 PLUNKETT S 12/11/2017 108671 40875 101-41900-404 ch pest control Total 108671: 59.18 PREMIER LIGHTING, INC. 12/11/2017 108672 42416 101-43000-403 lighting & labor PREMIER LIGHTING, INC. 12/11/2017 108672 42417 101-43000-403 lighting & labor Total 108672: RANDYS SANITATION INC 12/11/2017 108673 1241681 3 101-41900-404 Trash Service 9/2017 RANDYS SANITATION INC 12/11/2017 108673 1241681 3 101-45200-404 Trash Service 9/2017 RANDYS SANITATION INC 12/11/2017 108673 1241681 3 101-45210-404 Trash Service 9/2017 Page: 7 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Department Invoice Amount 104.85 Police Department 66.48 Police Department 66.61 Central Services 213.99 Central Services 46.23 Central Services 146.58 Central Services 5.18 Central Services 20.98 Police Department 17.19 Police Department 37.74 620.98 191,371.09 9,568.55- 181,802.54 250.00 250.00 700.00 700.00 Central Services 232.54 232.54 Public Works Department 997.00 Public Works Department 997.00 1,994.00 Central Services 932.99 Parks 409.67 Golf Course 59.18 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Page: 8 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 108673: 1,401.84 REED WHOLESALE/OFFICE CO 12/11/2017 108674 9418 101-45210-093 concessions Resale -GC Golf Course 49.80 Total 108674: 49.80 RITTER & RITTER SEWER SER 12/11/2017 108675 172616 602-49450-406 TELEVISE 8" Sanitary sewer Sewer 13,787.95 Total 108675: 13,787.95 Russell A Norum 12/11/2017 108676 11302017 999-10015 refund overpmt/3264 NSD 126.16 Total 108676: 126.16 Scherber Companies 12/11/2017 108677 2016-01444 101-22205 escrow refund -3295 crystal bay road 2,500.00 Total 108677: 2,500.00 SCOTT BORIS 12/11/2017 108678 07312017 101-42110-331 reimb for parking Police Department 211.00 Total 108678: 211.00 SHAUGHNESSY LAWN CARE 12/11/2017 108679 11202017 101-41900-319 fall cleanup & balance of mowing Central Services 579.41 SHAUGHNESSY LAWN CARE 12/11/2017 108679 11202017 101-45200-319 fall cleanup & balance of mowing Parks 3,743.88 SHAUGHNESSY LAWN CARE 12/11/2017 108679 11202017 601-49400-319 fall cleanup & balance of mowing Water 133.71 Total 108679: 4,457.00 STEVE RUCHTI 12/11/2017 108680 11062017 651-49910-489 beaver trapper/McCulley Road Storm Water 285.00 Total 108680: 285.00 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 12/11/2017 108681 11212017 101-41600-306 Prosecution Services -11/2017 Law/Legal Services 2,713.14 Total 108681: 2,713.14 THN ENTERPRISES 12/11/2017 108682 1917 101-45200-404 Big Island dock Transport Parks 4,300.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Page: 9 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 108682: 4,300.00 TODD MISCHKE 12/11/2017 108683 2017-00428 101-22205 escrow refund -3490 Birch Lane 2,500.00 Total 108683: 2,500.00 TRI CITY LAB 12/11/2017 108684 1700213 601-49400-489 water testing Water 31.50 Total 108684: 31.50 TRI COUNTY LAW ENFORCEME 12/11/2017 108685 09152017 101-42110-311 2017 Dues Police Department 75.00 Total 108685: 75.00 TWIN CITY STRIPING 12/11/2017 108686 11142017 101-43000-408 striping Mcculley Public Works Department 838.86 Total 108686: 838.86 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 12/11/2017 108687 12012017 101-42110-322 Po Box 86 Police Department 92.00 Total 108687: 92.00 VALLEY RICH CO 12/11/2017 108688 24921 601-49400-405 3800 casco ave Water 1,525.38 Total 108688: 1,525.38 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 101-42400-221 Cell Phones -09/07/17-10/06/17 Building & Zoning 1,454.43 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 101-41900-321 Cell Phones -09/07/17-10/06/17 Central Services 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 101-45210-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Golf Course 102.98 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 601-49400-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Water 103.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 602-49450-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Sewer 103.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 101-43000-321 2 ]pads Building Inspectors -05/07/17-06/06/17 Public Works Department 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/11/2017 108689 9795780363 101-42400-321 2 Ipads Building Inspectors -05/07/17-06/06/17 Building & Zoning 35.01 Total 108689: 1,884.93 VIC'S CRANE & HEAVY HAUL IN 12/11/2017 108690 37937 601-49400-403 Set generator Water 647.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/28/2017 - 12/11/2017 Page: 10 Dec 07, 2017 02:59PM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 108690: 647.50 WEILANDS ALL SEASONS CLINI 12/11/2017 108691 24039 101-41900-404 City Hall furnace repair Central Services 238.45 Total 108691: 238.45 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 12/11/2017 108692 285955 101-43000-224 snow tires for bobcat Public Works Department 1,300.00 Total 108692: 1,300.00 WSB 12/11/2017 108693 2 101-42400-319 navarre are plan Building & Zoning 6,918.00 Total 108693: 6,918.00 Grand Totals: 353,384.91 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 5 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Confirmation of 2018 Open Book Meeting — Date & Time Proposal Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain confirmation from the Mayor and City Council Members of the 2018 Open Book Meeting date and time proposal from the Hennepin County Assessor. 2. Background. Minnesota Statute 274.01, Subdivision 1, requires that the County Assessor set the date and time for our local board of appeal and equalization meeting. Orono has opted for an Open Book meeting in place of a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting. Hennepin County is proposing the meeting take place on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Orono Council Chambers located at 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the date, time and location proposed for the 2018 Open Book Meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the date, time and location for the 2018 Open Book Meeting as proposed. Exhibit Exhibit A. Hennepin County Confirmation Sheet Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -'bV HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA To: Orono City Clerk/City Administrator From: Kim Jensen, Senior Appraiser Date: November 28, 2017 Re: 2018 Open Book Meeting Wednesday, April 18, 2018 Date 4 — 6:30 PM Time Minnesota Statute 274.01, Subdivision 1, requires that the County Assessor set the date and time for your local board of appeal and equalization meeting. Your city has opted for an Open Book meeting in place of a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting. We are proposing the date and time referenced above based upon last year's meeting date. Please confirm the date and time above, or if you wish to change the date, call us with an alternative by January 26. In addition to the date, please complete the form (please print) with the name of the Mayor and Council Members. This will allow for Notices of Valuation and Classification to be prepared timely. If you have any questions, please call me at (612) 348-6106 or send me an e-mail at kimberly.jensen@hennepin.us. Please return the confirmation to Kim Jensen, A-2103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN, 55487, or email to AO.Admin@hennepin.us. CONFIRMATION City: Mayor: Date: Council: Time: Council: Place: Council: Council: Council: City Clerk/City Administrator Signature: AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 6 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Approval of 2018 Liquor License Renewal Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2018 Liquor License Renewal for Narrows Saloon. 2018 ANNUAL LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS — APPLICANTS • Orono Liquor Inc. DBA Narrows Saloon 3380 Shoreline Drive Navarre, MN 55392 The 2018 Liquor License Applicant has submitted all the requested documents and hasmet all requirements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the liquor license renewal for 2018 for the applicant listed above. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -1V AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Agreement Presenter: Dustin Rief, Agenda Consent Agenda City Administrator Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval of the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Agreement. 2. Background. The cooperative agreement between the City and the CBLID has been prepared for consideration of insurance, costs, and liability responsibilities between the City and the CBLID. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Orono and the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Agreement between the City and the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District as presented. Exhibit Exhibit A. Letter & Agreement Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: 5bV Approved By: -1 HGV L 2017 CITY OF ORONO November 18, 2017 Dustin Rief City Administrator City of Orono Dear Dustin, Steven Nielsen Chairman, Carman Bay Lake Improvement District 3300 Carman Rd Excelsior, Mn, 55331 612-716-1932 niels03l@umn.edu Enclosed are 2 original signed Agreements with respect to insurance coverage between the City of Orono and the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District. Please have Mayor Walsh and Anna Carlson sign and return one original copy to me for our CBLID records. Thank you to the City, as we do very much appreciate this cooperative agreement. Sincerely, Steven Nielsen AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT. made and entered info btand boNeen the CITY OF CII ONO, a Nfinnesota municipal corporation ("City"). and CAR -MAN BAS' LAKE Ili#PROVI EENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, ("District"). NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual eon=ena nts and. agr ment„s as �Wt f%th herein. bath dies hereby ackno-wiledge the sufficiency thereof the City and District agree as to]lwks: I. INSURANCE. City will add District as a covered party to all i0surAnce policies helot by the Cite -,Kith the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. 2. COSTS, The District shah be resrrmsibie for paying any and all costs. associated .Vilh its use of the insurmc:e co-,erages mated above. including, but not limited tc�. the pay meet of all deductibles and co-pa)—s for claims againsj the District and any and all casts above a and bq-ond the insurance coverage }units. 3. LIABILITY. Nothing in this Agreement shalt be interpreted to itn}xe any duct• Or liabilitt Onto the C:'ity for claims trade againa, the .District, The: rAstrict shall indemnify- and hold harmlcss the City. its officers, agentss, arta employees, of and from any and all clairms, demands. actions. c:au of action. including costs and attar y's tees. arisilig ottt of or by reason of the District's execution or performance of its righm powers. and duties, and further agrees to defend at its scale cost and expense any action or pTuceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting an): claim of whxatsoes er character arising then:.€roma. 4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire apyeements bet -ween the parties with respect to insurance cotvrage and the parties agree Haat there %v€ve no inducement. car repre-sentations leading to thrr exe%:utlon of this Agmemertt except as contained herein. IN WITNESS U I.ERECIF, the Cit.• and District have approved MW e<ieccuted this Agreement as of the dates listed below. Dated: CI'I°1' OF €IRM+ O By: L)erartus'Vi'alsh.lfa�•c�t• ....� Ansi: ~.tura ('arlsiar>. Cita Clerk 194"468% t Dated: 1V0Vern W tr• 16 201 7. CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT S?ti vtja ....,tt le- IvrL. Chairmata AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Cite"), and CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. ("District"). NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements as set forth herein, both parties hereby- acknowledge the sufficiency- thereof: the City and District agree as follows: I. INSURANCE. City will add District as a covered party to all insurance palic:ies held by the City with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. z. COSTS. The District shall be responsible for paying any and all costs associated with its use of the insurance coverages noted above, including, but not limited to. the payment of all deductibles and co -pays for claims against the District and any and all costs above and beyond the insurance coverage limits. 3. LIABILITY. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to impose any duty or Iiability unto the City for claims made against the District. The District shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents. and employees. of and from any and all claims, demands. actions. causes of action, including, costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the District's execution or performance of its rights. powers. and duties, and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commended for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising therefrom. 4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreements between the parties with respect to insurance coverage and the parties agree that there were no inducements or representations leading to the execution of this Agreement except as contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and District have approved and executed this Agreement as of the dates listed below. Dated: 2012, CITY OF ORONO BY: Dennis V4'alsh. Mayor And: Anna Carlson. City Clerk 194568%1 Dated: _ ten 6e r / &_, 2017. CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BY _Ctt-vM-._,.11li�l h... Chairman AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: #17-3981, Todd and Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, Variance — Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Consent Agenda Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances requests for for lake yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, hardcover to exceed 25%, Average lakeshore setback and driveway to exceed 8 feet in the shoreland overlay district. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on 9/20/2017; it was considered as complete on 11/8/2017. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires onl/8/2017. Background. Todd and Angie Olson are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home. They will keep the perimeter walls and plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition of an upper story, new front porch, a wider deck and removing and replacing the driveway to better serve the property. Majority of the home is currently placed within the 75' lake yard setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story addition is an increase in the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are asking for setback variances for this addition. They are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11' to 21' which increases the massing in the average lakeshore setback but it is proposed to encroach no closer to the lake then the existing deck. They will also move the 1- stall tuck -under garage to the east (other) side of the home which has room to create a 2 stall tuck -under garage. They are proposing to move the driveway which alters the existing hardcover on the site. The proposed driveway will serve the double garage and is 16' wide where 8' is the maximum width in the shoreland setback zone. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On November 20, 2017 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted unanimously in favor of the variance requests. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report Prepared By: LO References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Adjacent Property Owner Signature Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: _Sb9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-350, 78-1680, 78-1700, 17-1282, 78-1279 FILE NO. 17-3981 WHEREAS, on September 20, 2017, Todd and Angie Olson ("Applicants"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 3325 Crystal Bay Road and legally described as: Lot 5, Wallace's Addition on the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the `Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow for a 6 foot rear yard setback and 1.4 foot side yard setback ; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1680 to allow 50.9 foot lake yard setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1700 to allow to allow for 47.3% hardcover; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1282 to allow to allow for a driveway width to exceed 8 feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow the home to encroach in the average Lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby [approves/denies] the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3981. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1C Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.1 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 50 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Rear yard b. Side yard c. 75 foot lake yard d. Hardcover to exceed 25% e. Driveway width to exceed 8 feet f. Average Lake Shore setback 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The rear, side, and lake yard setback and the wider driveway variance are in harmony with the purpose of the ordinances. The CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. hardcover is proposed to decrease being the site closer to conformance with the ordinances. The lot includes challenges with the small size in the LR -1C zoning district and the orientation towards the lake. The lot is also challenged with the existing Crystal Bay Road that runs through the lake yard of the property. The average lakeshore setback is proposed to stay the same distance for the new deck compared to the existing deck but will increase the square footage in this setback. The applicant should demonstrate practical difficulties to support the expansion in this location. The visual impact to the property to the east is somewhat minimal as the existing garage in that location blocks lake view. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The applicant is proposing to keep the existing foundation to maintain the existing footprint of the home. The proposing upper level addition is a reasonable use of the property. There is no space to build a conforming structure. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The applicant is working within the existing footprint of the home, which was not created by the current landowner and will be maintaining the existing rear, side, lake yard setbacks. They hardcover, driveway width and average lakeshore setback are all being altered from the existing home. And c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The proposed addition and remodel of the existing home will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The small building envelope with the substandard lot, and the right of way that passed through the lake yard of the property create a difficulties that are unique to the property. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." Crystal Bay Road is relatively unique within the LR -1C district due to the shallowness and narrowness of the lots, the road location, the proximity to the lake, and the existing Hennepin County Rail property to the rear. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Staff finds this to be true to allow for the upper addition of the home and to address the driveway access for the garage. The Commission should discuss whether the applicant has satisfied the practical difficulty requirements to support the variance from the average lakeshore setback. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The applicant has stated additional living space will alleviate a practical difficulty relating to the existing space within the home on the property. The property is unique in size as well as location between Crystal Bay Road and a regional trail. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350, 78-1680, 78-1700, 17-1282, 78-1279 to allow rear yard, side yard, lake yard, hardcover to exceed 25%, driveway to exceed 8 feet in width, and average lakeshore setback encroachments, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated November 811, 2017 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the addition and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (December 11, 2018). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 11 day of December, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. jQK�' 1LIjNN�'TONI� 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER AND O.H.W. UNE (929.4) 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of�— such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. y S 88'5337" E H- 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be 50_29 existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. — Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones \ ' shown hereon.% -EXISTING ROADWAY N STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: (CRYSTAL BAY RD) ;io � " • " Denotes iron survey marker, found unless otherwise noted.10 C3 ' PARKING J ' ' A 0 PAD ' 14.1 AVE SETBACK LAKESHORE ' -------- ' C3 EXISTING ' — DECKGARA' 0B 8 GE ' ; DECK -2.3 Z— ' 9.5: 38.3 W 00 O ' JLA 01 00 EXISTING E)(ISING W fV pWELLING EXISING p DWELLING DWELLING CA 1 Ca EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS rn 1-75' SETBACK HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. _ _1.4 BI.LUMINOUS PARKING DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. I 1 38.3 PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. \ �, PATIO cn DECK 96 SQ. FT. i PATIO 120 SQ. FT. _ — TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT.50.02 BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. ���`' N 86.423$" E TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. p G f X AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. n� D. AUT1yORITY HARDCOVER % 59.0% �.� HENN jT d 6 CO. TIMBER WALLS X X '-WOOD FENCE DATE EVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY Advance WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SURVEYOR AND THnTHELA DULY REGISTERED SURVEYOR EXISTING SURVEY TODD OLSON UNDER OF THE STATEM E$fJTA. SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Surveying & Engineering, Co. 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. — DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 S1 17917 Highway No. 7 Wayne W. Preu 0 10, 20' ORONO, NIN Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 DRAWING NUMBER Phone (952) 474-7964 #43503 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 Web: www.advsur.com LICENSE NO. 170918 WP SHEET 1 OF 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "0" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted. LME ff1JVNL'TONKA ,APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER AND O.H.W. UNE (929.4) T_ \ 1 � 1 y S 88'53'37" E - 50_29 ,1 1 \1 1 I EXISTING ROADWAY--% m (CRYSTAL BAY RD) ; 1 ` I 1 � 1 , � . 1 p°r" -;...�^ �r ; 14_1 D" c _. -23 Z- 38.3 O "PROP. STOOP W --A 00 EXISTING N ti 1 I � 1 J I 1 O I I ' -75' SETBACK -1.4 AVE. LAKESHORE`SETBACK ' I 1 1 ` 1 i Vis. -s O 9.5. • 00 i PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS -P N ' (X L, EXISTING 1 HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. _P co DWELLING J PROP. DRIVEWAY 292 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. PROP. STOOP 44 SQ. FT. PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. r'1 PROP. WALK 71 SQ. FT. DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. PROP. OVERHANG 126 SQ. FT. DECK 96 SQ. FT. PATIO 120 SQ. FT. PATIO 120 SQ. FT. TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. I 1 TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,716 SQ. FT. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. HARDCOVER % 58.1% HARDCOVER % 59.0% �G�P . 1 p°r" -;...�^ �r ; 14_1 D" c _. -23 Z- 38.3 O "PROP. STOOP W --A 00 EXISTING N ti DWELLINGCIO -75' SETBACK -1.4 PATIO i 50.02 N 86'42'38" E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 1,10) V Y 1 1 1 1 1 i EXISTING GARAGE SITUMINOUS PARKING HENN. CO. F.R.% AUTHORITY X X ` WOOD FENCE vo EXISTING DWELLING RtCEivE® NOV U 8 2017 CITY OF ORONO DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY Advance WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED SURVEYOR EXISTING SURVEY 11/6/17 SHOW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TODD OLSON UNDER THE LA OF THE STATE M fl TA. SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Surveying & Engineering, Co. S 1 " 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. "`' �"'`� S DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 17917 Highway No. 7 Wayne W. Preu 0 10' 20' ORONO, MN Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 DRAWING NUMBER Web:ewwwadvsurcom LIIC4ENSENO. SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 170918 WP � SHEET 1 OF 1 �fff ��FVATION 5CAI. I/B" =I'-0" F��VATION NOTI�5; 4"VINY JAW HA?bl 5NAKE T" 5TA66FPFP EPGF 6" FXPOSUpF AXI VNG FPONT FLFVAfION 21-011 JAMF5 HAPV PLANK 5/4" CWAPMIW 4" FXP05HFF KICKOUT FLA5HIN6 TO 13F IN5TALLFP A5 NEEPEP EXTFPWP, WALL FIN15NEk* TO VFIJFY KICKOUT FLA5HIN6 15 IN5TALLEP Pk;lOk: TO FINI5HIN6 CWPFNTEV TO FLA5H ALL FXTFVlOk WINPOW5 ANP POOk,5 PEPMN ANP IPC COPF5 kFQURFMFNT5 ALL 5CV? W5 ANP NAIL5 BEING P'ILLEP THPOUGN FXTEPZO: FIN15H MU5T 13F Fr: PVILLEP ANP 5FALFP TO PPtVFNT WATF!' PENETPWION THVOUGN MATNEk' L W IFk ICE ANP WATFP. 24" UP ALL WAL1-5 WHFPF POOF PUN5 ALONG -HE WA,L HOMFOWN�F/ LANb5CAFl?; TO PPFV�NT M015TJk:E P?013LEM` , FINAL 6kAPE 5HOULP !3F NFLP A MINIMUM OF 6" 13FLOW THE TOP OF THF FOUNPATION, FINAL GAF 5HOJL12 SLOPE AWAY FPOM HOLI5E, NOTE; F1,FVATION5 Pk?AWING WF FOP, I1-LU5TPWION5 rXI"05F ONLY! EXACT FLEVATION OF TNF HOME TO 13F CON5-TIJCTEP ON YOUR LOT WILL VWY PFPFNPING UPON MANY FACTOf:5, 50ME OF TNF FACTOk25 Ar:F TNF TOPO6PAPHY OF THF LOT, TNF MA5TEk, GP.APING PLAN FOP TNF 5UPPIVI510N, NUM!3Fp OF COUp5F5 OF BLOCK IN FOJNPATION, HEIGHT OF FIST FLOOP, CEILING, FTC. TNF5E PLAN5 ANP PpINT5 P? MAIN TNF FXCLU5IVF CONFIPENTIAL rTOPFPTY OF TNF OWNFP, AMP MAY 13 U5E5) L3Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOF TNF PU?1`05F 5PFCIFICA I -Y AUTNOPIZFP 13Y TNF OWNEP UNAUTHO,IZFP COPYING OF PFPIQOPUCTION5 OF ANY POrfION 15 FOPTWPEN 6LA55 pAILING AZFK Pral'yV BACK �VAION 5CA-� 1/811-11-01, _0 ' PE IF-0-11F—M—IIF—M—IIF—M—IIF—M—IIF-0-11FM—lI ME IN MS -110-1-1 IF-0-11FONIFO-1 all. N-1 FR—1 FR -1 1-1 El FR -11--1 FPON-' �L�VAVQN 5CAL� 1/411-11-01, 12 16 &-®1S I \ I Lfll I I VLl- I✓ V/ \I Il/I V SCALE 1/8" -1'-0" JAMF5 HWPI 5HAKF 7" 5TA66F1?,FP FPGF 6" EXP05UkIF YL 51PING JAME5 NWPI 5HAKF CFPFf?MILL VFVVCAL 5112IN6 JAMF5 NWPI FLANK 514" CEPWMILL 4" EXP05UPIF GpWF A c� U 1..4 �z 0� A�z 0 0 �..� N c� M [WAWN LN: LOpI bA� F� V PAS 5CA-� 5FF PLAN 5H�F-r: Al OWZOpU� QQ� GQUf���Oz lo Uul w�QaO � p .a.a9 zoNw��Z� srOFAGF �7 p Z 0 u BOOM �cn~C7ww�-0 QOC)ZZUw 7-71 1 3P ¢oTw< ~�zwpPQ H rX1srINGJ015T zuu z O MCN U��Zp DOM azo U� h cnOwu u Ln wU �, -6" 4' -6" 3' -6" 13' -10.. srOpAG� CUOs�r Q Z 0 di � FAMILY Z e00M x O 2 lit L M I T-6 T-01' 13' -10' M lo FX15/pT��ING I�A/�5FM�Nf 5CA-L 1/'111 —11-011 ol lo ol Ilk j 3 Q, oke L Z N v�� o 000 0 "o M ` N • C� MAWN IN: OI�I BATF 5-I-15 SCPJ �Xb-QHG MAIN F�OOP, I� �A5, MWNT PLAN A2 �A�I�Inf:Y KIrCN�N �FnpOOM pOOM nI�ING 5 0 13A1Nf?OOM � z Ul x _1 N N GploEAr pOOM � � 13�npOOM I'OOM z Q 161-101, �ArNpOOM ® 0 20' -I I ' I�' 12' -6" �UpN N N O a pOOM 30 ,O 30 �XIsrING ��ApING WALL — � � O O — i?�MOV� �XIsrING 13�APING WALL �XIsrING 2x10 JOlsr � f?�f�UAC� Wlrl-I NEW Sr�UU ��AM _ 16" O,C, N . 6 z NSW I3�ApING WAUU 2x6 stuns 16" O.C. . I Cps 6" NAL NIGH CONCp�1� 13�OCK � 28 � 16"x8" CONCp�1� N001"ING W/ 2 #� p�-�Ap z �0 — LU 16'x7' OV�f?N�An POOP, I?Als�n PANEL � OO � (7)� INsu�ArloN�n - 90 MPH WINn pArING I 6" VANITY . NO GUAss � � I'OWn�p �' OM rIU� N�An�I�-�UUSN �o 2 � 17'-5" O 20' -II" 5 O � X N x 9/z" rpr'n G�UEUAM-�UUSN — Iz' 19, -91 I2' 21'-0'' 6�N�rl& CON5Tr_1UC1'ION No1rr-15; WOF A55�MDI_Y 11'�M5: TYPICAL POOF TI?U55 TO HAVE A MIN 6'' FNFPGY HEE1-, JNUF55 OTHFPWI5F NOTEP ON PLAN5 ANP/ OP 5ECVON(5) MINIMUM I'' AIP FLOOD PA55A6F TO IW MAINTIANFP!ALL POOF WGFS FOP A MINIMUM OF 48'' FROM OUT5IPF OF FXTI IOP WAW,IN5TA1_1- Alp CHW5 A5 PFQ' P ( 2) PQLLS ICF & WATFP 5HIFW AT ALU ROOF W6F5 SOFFIT VFNTIUATION I / 300 PPOVIPFP 50/ -80% OF VFNTFP APFA 15 PPOVIPW WITH VENTILATOR LOCATFP IN THE UPPFP PORTION OF TNF 5PACF 13EIN6 VFNTEP (min OF 36" A3OVF FAVE OP COPNICF) WITH TNF DA-ANCF OF TNF PFQ'P VFNI1UATOP IN TNF FAVF5 OF CORNICE per IPC 806.2 51_1011 F — UL 8'48" WALL HEIWT KITCHEN woor -71-811 WALL A55M31,Y & 5TPICTUPF IT�M5 ALU WINPOW5 & POOP5 TO 13E CAJWW PEP MANUFACTUPFP WCOMMFWATION5 CONFIRM WINDOW POU6H OWNING WITH 5UPPI- EP P.O. MAY 13F APJU51_FP 13Y 5UPI'VEP I3A5W ON MULLING PFQJIPFMFNT5 CONFIRM WINDOW MANUFACTUPF WITH (3UI1-PEP PPIOP TO CON5TFUCTION PPOVIPF PI-OCKING AT ALL WINDOW OPFNIN65 FOP WINDOW 1WATMFNT5 PPOVIPF BLOCKING FDP ALL CA31NET5, CONFIRM FINAL LAYOUT WITH 5UPPLIFP INTEMOP VAPOR PAI IW5 TO 13F CONTINUOU5 w/ 1-A'PFP & TAPPW 5FAM5 VAPOR PAPPIW TO 3E CAULKED TO TAMING @513-FLOOP & INTF-00F PAPTITION WALL5 A,1- OUTLFT5 & 5WITCHF5 ON EXTFPIOP WALL TO 3F IN 5F&FP F1-FCTPICAL ENFPGY 130XF5 5UPFAW PPAINAGF WAW 135 PIVEPTFP TO A 5TOPM 5EWW OP AN APPPOVFP CODU�CTION POINT, PPOPFPII' 5HALU 13E GPAPW AWAY FPOM FOUNPATION WA -1- WITH A min GPAPF OF 6'' WITHIN THE FIP5T 10'-0'' FROM TNF HOU5E ALL HEAPED 5IZF TO 13F 2xIO UNI -F55 NOTFP OTHFPWI5F ON PLAN AL1- HFAPFP5 4'-0'' ANP LONGED PFQJIPE POU1- TI IMWP ANP FI_OOP 13000KIN6 GAIT POOP HFAPEP 15 PFQJIPFP TO 13F FULL LFNWH OF GAPALF WALL WWN LF55 THFN 24'' OF FXTFPIOP WALL APF APJACENT ON EACH 51PF OF OVEPHFAP POOP 50LIP BEADING RFQUIPFP TO GO TO PA5WFNT FOUNPATION/ FOOTING FOP ALL POINT LOAP5, INCLUPING GIPPED POINT5 PPOVIPF 131-OCKIN6 FOP FUOOP 5Y5WM A5 PFP MANUFACTUPF5 PFQUIPEMFW5 PPOVIPF 5MOKF PETECTOP5 ANP CAP130N MONOXIPF PFTFCTOP5 `FP, IPC CWF 38' -4" �FXI5TIN6 PATIO POOP _ bW TO REMAIN I � CID ROOF Tf2U55�5 24" O.C. N� �v z� O— FXI5TING FIPFPLACF 8'-V8" WALL HFIGHT FAMILY DOOM woor 8' -V8" WA -1- HFIWT PINING DOOM P00� W J55F 5 24'' O.C. 20'-11 '' woor 9' -11 " 101-41, 3' -4" 18" �LOOt? WU55� 19,2" O.C. 1 -711 O 8' -V8" WALL HEIGHT LAUNPPY C 30 UNOL�LIM Ff (s Wc, 0 1 WINDOW 5CHF12ULF MAPVIN WINPOW5 ANP POOP: NM3P 48" VANITY 51ZF WALL HEIGHT O ° 13ATNPOOM 1201-66L LINOL�LIM 2 III 3� POP & 5HN, ` WALL WIWT - MA5TFP 13FPPPOM woor 18" FLOOD TPUSW S 19,2" O.C. 4' -1 " MAIN FLOOD PLAN 5c&L 1/4" -1'-O" THF5F PLAN5 ANP PPINT5 PFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNTIAL PPOPFPTY OF TNF OWNFP, ANP MAY 13E J5FP 13Y OTHFP5 ONLY FOP TNF PUPP05F 5PECIFICAL1-Y AJTHOPIZFP 13Y TNF OWNFP, UNAUTHOPIZFP COPYING OP PFPPOPUC110N5 OF ANY PORTION 15 FOVPIPPFN 21 _�14 8, --7/2 131_411 2'-6y4 " I WINDOW NOTF,5; F6PF55 WINDOW: ALU PFPPOOM5 APF TO HAVE ONF ( 1) MINIMUM OWNING APFA: 5,Y 5QJAII FFFT MINIMUM OPFNING HEIGHT; 24" MINIMUM OPFNING WIPTH 20'' MAXIMUM 511-1- HFIGHT A(30VF FLOOD 44'' WINDOW FALL PP0T�CV01q: IF TNF _OM5T PAP.T OF THE OPENING OF AN OWWI3UE WINDOW 15 LOCATFP MOPS NAN 72'' A30VF FINIWFP 6PAPF OP 5UPFACF 13FLOW, THE UOWF5T PAP.T OF TNF WINDOW OPFNING 5H&I- 13F IN MINIMUM OF 36" AI30VF FINISHW FUOOP IN TNF DOOM OF VOCATION, OPWWLW WCTION OF WINPOW5 5HALL NOT PFPMIT A 4'' PIA 5PHFPF TO PA55 THROUGH OPFNING IF LOCASP WITHIN 36" OF FINI511F5) FLOOD, WINPOW5 WITH A BOTTOM 511-1- HFIGHT LE55 THEN 36 "ABOVE FINI5HW GRAPE 5HAL1- HAVE A FALU PPEVENTION PEVICF THAT COMPLIF5 WITH A5TM F 2090 IN5TALLFP, WINDOW WF_LI,: WHEN WQUIPFP FOP FMFPGFNCY F5CAPE IT 5HAW AL1 -OW THE WINDOW TO OWN FULLY. A MINIMUM NFT CLEAR APPA OF 9 5QUAPE FFFT, ANP A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 36" PACK WAY WINDOW WW1 -5 WITH A VEPTICA_ PFPTH OF MOPF THAN 44 MU5T 13E FQJIPPW WITH AN APPPOVFP LAPPED TFMWPFP WINPOW5: WINDOW 511-1 UF55 THAN 18'' A130VF TNF FLOOD, WINDOW PANF 15 GPFATFP THAT 9 5QJAPF FEET, 3ATHPOOM5, 5TAIPWAY LANPING, ANP 24'' FPOM A POOP OPFNING -- NOTE; MAIN FLOOD WINDOW HFAPFR 15 SFT AT 6'-10'' 3UILPFP TO CONFIRM WINPOW P O, WITH 5UPPLIFP PPIOP TO CON5TPUC110N P,O, MAY W APJU51'EP PFPENPANT ON WINDOW MI -II -LING PFQUIPFMFNT5 � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 u�Qw�Qau W �"a �D u z -M w�wOw o0 AQzzU ��u,� ~�wP4u WOwa�"�zQ U<0P z �o u<u R"Ww FC(� Ln u Z A 0 7 M Il..4 �z 0� A�z A �0 Lr) 0 �..I N c� M 5�CON12 FLOOD APPITION 5CA, 1/4" -1'-O" WAWN LN: I,OpI bA� F� V PAS 5CAL� 5FF PLAN WINDOW 5CHF12ULF MAPVIN WINPOW5 ANP POOP: NM3P 111W 51ZF WFCIAL NFW5 POUCH OPENING I PATIO POOP 1201-66L P.O. 121-1/4'' y,6' -B1 I 2 POU131-F HUNG CJPH-NG 1614 P,O. 11-10141, X3'-0" 3 POUI3LF HUNG CUPH-NG 3226 F WOCP V. 0. 3' -2/'' x 5 -0" 3 POUPI_F HUNG CJPH-NG 1616 2W P.Q. 3' -6y2,, x 3' -4" 5 FXI5TIN6 PATIO POOP Y POUPI_F HUNG CUPH-NG 3226 F WOCP P,O, 6' -/YV x 5' -O" 8 9 -- NOTE; MAIN FLOOD WINDOW HFAPFR 15 SFT AT 6'-10'' 3UILPFP TO CONFIRM WINPOW P O, WITH 5UPPLIFP PPIOP TO CON5TPUC110N P,O, MAY W APJU51'EP PFPENPANT ON WINDOW MI -II -LING PFQUIPFMFNT5 � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 u�Qw�Qau W �"a �D u z -M w�wOw o0 AQzzU ��u,� ~�wP4u WOwa�"�zQ U<0P z �o u<u R"Ww FC(� Ln u Z A 0 7 M Il..4 �z 0� A�z A �0 Lr) 0 �..I N c� M 5�CON12 FLOOD APPITION 5CA, 1/4" -1'-O" WAWN LN: I,OpI bA� F� V PAS 5CAL� 5FF PLAN 5TAIP,WAY NOTF5 -7 3Xj" MAX P,6S P, 10'' MIN TPFAP CUr MINIMUM HFAPP,OOM; MFA5XP, P VFFTICAULY FFOM TNF 51-OPFIP FUANF APJOININ6 TNF TFFAP N051NG 5TAIFWAY 5HALL NOT r3F LF55 THAN 36" CI -W, WIPTN ABOVE HAND FAIL ANP BELOW FFQUIFFP HFAPP,OOM 6FIPPM3 HANPFAIL 5HALL NOr PPOJFCT MOFF THAN 4/2" INTO TNF 5rAIFCA5F OP,FNING, HAND FAIL IN rO r?F UOCATFP 34'' - 38" A130VF TFFAP NOSING � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 U-Qw�Qau W �"a �D U) wOwOw�oO A QzzU u ~�wP4 W0waE-,P4 �wro 0� U<0P z wp4,u�u Lr) � q U AVG. F-49 13LOWN ININ5ULATION� 4 -MIL VAPOP, 13AP,JFP, 5FALFP @ 5FAM5 097 ANP FPGF5, LAP 5FAM5 6" 5/8PFYwALL z � 12 Q° A5PHALr 5HIN6LF5 15# FF�r O U 9 0 2-P,OW5 ICF ANP WATFP, 5HVI-P r N �I c� 24'' FA5T IN51PF WALL -INF 15X32" 0513 FOOF 5HFATHIN6 M 2X6 '5013-FA50A ALUMINUM 5OFFIr ANP FA5CIA COLOF; 2X6 5-U2516 %6'' OW 5HF. WEATHFP, G 4" VINYL 51PF5 ANC JAMF5 HAFPI 13UI�bING S�C1'ION THF5F FLAN5 ANP FP,INT5 FFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNTlAL P,FOP,FPTY OF TNF OWNFP,, ANP MAY I3F U5FP 13Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOP, THE P,UFP,05F 5PFCIFICALLY AUTHOPIZFP 6Y TNF OWNFP,, UNAUTHOP,IZFP COP,YIN6 OP, P,FP,FOPUCTION5 OF ANY POFTION 15 FOP,I3IPPFN WAWN LN: �Opl bA� p� V PAS 5CA-� 5FF PLAN 5HF-r; A4 4 5rAIPWAY N01E5 -7 Y4'' MAX P,6S P, 10'' MIN TP,FAP CUT MINIMUM HFAPP,OOM; MFA5UFFP VWTICALLY FFOM TNF 51-OpW PLANE POJOININ6 TNF TFFAP NOSING 5TAIFWAY 5HALL NOT [�F LF55 THAN �56'' CLFAF WIDTH APOVF HAND FAIL ANP 13F1 -OW FFQUIFFP HFAPP,OOM 60PAWF HANPFAIL 5HAL1- NOT PFOJFCT MOFF THAN 4%2" INTO TNF 5TAIFCA5F OP,FNIN6. HAND FAIL IN TO r3F LOCATED 54'' - 38" A3OVF TFFAP NOSING 2x6 51 ALUMINUM 50FFITA� COLOF, 2X6 5TU -/6" 05[ WFA11 JAMF51- THF5F P,LAN5 ANP FFINT5 FFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNI1AL FP,OP,FFTY OF TNF OWNFF, ANP MAY 13F U5FP 13Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOP, THE P,UFF05F 5PFCIFICALLY AUTHOFIZFP 6Y THF OWNFP,, UNAUTHOP,IZW COP,YIN6 OP, FFP,FOPUCTION5 OF ANY FOF110N 15 FOP,I3IPPFN ATHING JFF ING IJC'ArION WALL zw OwZ7pzUn U�zza�'��z wo�w�woo wc!)Ww�C��'E; U-QW�aau W �"�= J z �ozo�4Uoz UWxc�n0 zz wu C4pcHnPQw� �D- wOw�H�Zd Hw�c p� U79zuxx wxou-'u U zA 0 � M u � a z 0� A zz 0 �0 N M M WAWN 13Y; �Opl la"3�ATMIN �G\1m 5� � PM 5H��T: A�? �fff ��FVATION 5CAI. I/B" =I'-0" F��VATION NOTI�5; 4"VINY JAW HA?bl 5NAKE T" 5TA66FPFP EPGF 6" FXPOSUpF AXI VNG FPONT FLFVAfION 21-011 JAMF5 HAPV PLANK 5/4" CWAPMIW 4" FXP05HFF KICKOUT FLA5HIN6 TO 13F IN5TALLFP A5 NEEPEP EXTFPWP, WALL FIN15NEk* TO VFIJFY KICKOUT FLA5HIN6 15 IN5TALLEP Pk;lOk: TO FINI5HIN6 CWPFNTEV TO FLA5H ALL FXTFVlOk WINPOW5 ANP POOk,5 PEPMN ANP IPC COPF5 kFQURFMFNT5 ALL 5CV? W5 ANP NAIL5 BEING P'ILLEP THPOUGN FXTEPZO: FIN15H MU5T 13F Fr: PVILLEP ANP 5FALFP TO PPtVFNT WATF!' PENETPWION THVOUGN MATNEk' L W IFk ICE ANP WATFP. 24" UP ALL WAL1-5 WHFPF POOF PUN5 ALONG -HE WA,L HOMFOWN�F/ LANb5CAFl?; TO PPFV�NT M015TJk:E P?013LEM` , FINAL 6kAPE 5HOULP !3F NFLP A MINIMUM OF 6" 13FLOW THE TOP OF THF FOUNPATION, FINAL GAF 5HOJL12 SLOPE AWAY FPOM HOLI5E, NOTE; F1,FVATION5 Pk?AWING WF FOP, I1-LU5TPWION5 rXI"05F ONLY! EXACT FLEVATION OF TNF HOME TO 13F CON5-TIJCTEP ON YOUR LOT WILL VWY PFPFNPING UPON MANY FACTOf:5, 50ME OF TNF FACTOk25 Ar:F TNF TOPO6PAPHY OF THF LOT, TNF MA5TEk, GP.APING PLAN FOP TNF 5UPPIVI510N, NUM!3Fp OF COUp5F5 OF BLOCK IN FOJNPATION, HEIGHT OF FIST FLOOP, CEILING, FTC. TNF5E PLAN5 ANP PpINT5 P? MAIN TNF FXCLU5IVF CONFIPENTIAL rTOPFPTY OF TNF OWNFP, AMP MAY 13 U5E5) L3Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOF TNF PU?1`05F 5PFCIFICA I -Y AUTNOPIZFP 13Y TNF OWNEP UNAUTHO,IZFP COPYING OF PFPIQOPUCTION5 OF ANY POrfION 15 FOPTWPEN 6LA55 pAILING AZFK Pral'yV BACK �VAION 5CA-� 1/811-11-01, _0 ' PE IF-0-11F—M—IIF—M—IIF—M—IIF—M—IIF-0-11FM—lI ME IN MS -110-1-1 IF-0-11FONIFO-1 all. N-1 FR—1 FR -1 1-1 El FR -11--1 FPON-' �L�VAVQN 5CAL� 1/411-11-01, 12 16 &-®1S I \ I Lfll I I VLl- I✓ V/ \I Il/I V SCALE 1/8" -1'-0" JAMF5 HWPI 5HAKF 7" 5TA66F1?,FP FPGF 6" EXP05UkIF YL 51PING JAME5 NWPI 5HAKF CFPFf?MILL VFVVCAL 5112IN6 JAMF5 NWPI FLANK 514" CEPWMILL 4" EXP05UPIF GpWF A c� U 1..4 �z 0� A�z 0 0 �..� N c� M [WAWN LN: LOpI bA� F� V PAS 5CA-� 5FF PLAN 5H�F-r: Al OWZOpU� QQ� GQUf���Oz lo Uul w�QaO � p .a.a9 zoNw��Z� srOFAGF �7 p Z 0 u BOOM �cn~C7ww�-0 QOC)ZZUw 7-71 1 3P ¢oTw< ~�zwpPQ H rX1srINGJ015T zuu z O MCN U��Zp DOM azo U� h cnOwu u Ln wU �, -6" 4' -6" 3' -6" 13' -10.. srOpAG� CUOs�r Q Z 0 di � FAMILY Z e00M x O 2 lit L M I T-6 T-01' 13' -10' M lo FX15/pT��ING I�A/�5FM�Nf 5CA-L 1/'111 —11-011 ol lo ol Ilk j 3 Q, oke L Z N v�� o 000 0 "o M ` N • C� MAWN IN: OI�I BATF 5-I-15 SCPJ �Xb-QHG MAIN F�OOP, I� �A5, MWNT PLAN A2 �A�I�Inf:Y KIrCN�N �FnpOOM pOOM nI�ING 5 0 13A1Nf?OOM � z Ul x _1 N N GploEAr pOOM � � 13�npOOM I'OOM z Q 161-101, �ArNpOOM ® 0 20' -I I ' I�' 12' -6" �UpN N N O a pOOM 30 ,O 30 �XIsrING ��ApING WALL — � � O O — i?�MOV� �XIsrING 13�APING WALL �XIsrING 2x10 JOlsr � f?�f�UAC� Wlrl-I NEW Sr�UU ��AM _ 16" O,C, N . 6 z NSW I3�ApING WAUU 2x6 stuns 16" O.C. . I Cps 6" NAL NIGH CONCp�1� 13�OCK � 28 � 16"x8" CONCp�1� N001"ING W/ 2 #� p�-�Ap z �0 — LU 16'x7' OV�f?N�An POOP, I?Als�n PANEL � OO � (7)� INsu�ArloN�n - 90 MPH WINn pArING I 6" VANITY . NO GUAss � � I'OWn�p �' OM rIU� N�An�I�-�UUSN �o 2 � 17'-5" O 20' -II" 5 O � X N x 9/z" rpr'n G�UEUAM-�UUSN — Iz' 19, -91 I2' 21'-0'' 6�N�rl& CON5Tr_1UC1'ION No1rr-15; WOF A55�MDI_Y 11'�M5: TYPICAL POOF TI?U55 TO HAVE A MIN 6'' FNFPGY HEE1-, JNUF55 OTHFPWI5F NOTEP ON PLAN5 ANP/ OP 5ECVON(5) MINIMUM I'' AIP FLOOD PA55A6F TO IW MAINTIANFP!ALL POOF WGFS FOP A MINIMUM OF 48'' FROM OUT5IPF OF FXTI IOP WAW,IN5TA1_1- Alp CHW5 A5 PFQ' P ( 2) PQLLS ICF & WATFP 5HIFW AT ALU ROOF W6F5 SOFFIT VFNTIUATION I / 300 PPOVIPFP 50/ -80% OF VFNTFP APFA 15 PPOVIPW WITH VENTILATOR LOCATFP IN THE UPPFP PORTION OF TNF 5PACF 13EIN6 VFNTEP (min OF 36" A3OVF FAVE OP COPNICF) WITH TNF DA-ANCF OF TNF PFQ'P VFNI1UATOP IN TNF FAVF5 OF CORNICE per IPC 806.2 51_1011 F — UL 8'48" WALL HEIWT KITCHEN woor -71-811 WALL A55M31,Y & 5TPICTUPF IT�M5 ALU WINPOW5 & POOP5 TO 13E CAJWW PEP MANUFACTUPFP WCOMMFWATION5 CONFIRM WINDOW POU6H OWNING WITH 5UPPI- EP P.O. MAY 13F APJU51_FP 13Y 5UPI'VEP I3A5W ON MULLING PFQJIPFMFNT5 CONFIRM WINDOW MANUFACTUPF WITH (3UI1-PEP PPIOP TO CON5TFUCTION PPOVIPF PI-OCKING AT ALL WINDOW OPFNIN65 FOP WINDOW 1WATMFNT5 PPOVIPF BLOCKING FDP ALL CA31NET5, CONFIRM FINAL LAYOUT WITH 5UPPLIFP INTEMOP VAPOR PAI IW5 TO 13F CONTINUOU5 w/ 1-A'PFP & TAPPW 5FAM5 VAPOR PAPPIW TO 3E CAULKED TO TAMING @513-FLOOP & INTF-00F PAPTITION WALL5 A,1- OUTLFT5 & 5WITCHF5 ON EXTFPIOP WALL TO 3F IN 5F&FP F1-FCTPICAL ENFPGY 130XF5 5UPFAW PPAINAGF WAW 135 PIVEPTFP TO A 5TOPM 5EWW OP AN APPPOVFP CODU�CTION POINT, PPOPFPII' 5HALU 13E GPAPW AWAY FPOM FOUNPATION WA -1- WITH A min GPAPF OF 6'' WITHIN THE FIP5T 10'-0'' FROM TNF HOU5E ALL HEAPED 5IZF TO 13F 2xIO UNI -F55 NOTFP OTHFPWI5F ON PLAN AL1- HFAPFP5 4'-0'' ANP LONGED PFQJIPE POU1- TI IMWP ANP FI_OOP 13000KIN6 GAIT POOP HFAPEP 15 PFQJIPFP TO 13F FULL LFNWH OF GAPALF WALL WWN LF55 THFN 24'' OF FXTFPIOP WALL APF APJACENT ON EACH 51PF OF OVEPHFAP POOP 50LIP BEADING RFQUIPFP TO GO TO PA5WFNT FOUNPATION/ FOOTING FOP ALL POINT LOAP5, INCLUPING GIPPED POINT5 PPOVIPF 131-OCKIN6 FOP FUOOP 5Y5WM A5 PFP MANUFACTUPF5 PFQUIPEMFW5 PPOVIPF 5MOKF PETECTOP5 ANP CAP130N MONOXIPF PFTFCTOP5 `FP, IPC CWF 38' -4" �FXI5TIN6 PATIO POOP _ bW TO REMAIN I � CID ROOF Tf2U55�5 24" O.C. N� �v z� O— FXI5TING FIPFPLACF 8'-V8" WALL HFIGHT FAMILY DOOM woor 8' -V8" WA -1- HFIWT PINING DOOM P00� W J55F 5 24'' O.C. 20'-11 '' woor 9' -11 " 101-41, 3' -4" 18" �LOOt? WU55� 19,2" O.C. 1 -711 O 8' -V8" WALL HEIGHT LAUNPPY C 30 UNOL�LIM Ff (s Wc, 0 1 WINDOW 5CHF12ULF MAPVIN WINPOW5 ANP POOP: NM3P 48" VANITY 51ZF WALL HEIGHT O ° 13ATNPOOM 1201-66L LINOL�LIM 2 III 3� POP & 5HN, ` WALL WIWT - MA5TFP 13FPPPOM woor 18" FLOOD TPUSW S 19,2" O.C. 4' -1 " MAIN FLOOD PLAN 5c&L 1/4" -1'-O" THF5F PLAN5 ANP PPINT5 PFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNTIAL PPOPFPTY OF TNF OWNFP, ANP MAY 13E J5FP 13Y OTHFP5 ONLY FOP TNF PUPP05F 5PECIFICAL1-Y AJTHOPIZFP 13Y TNF OWNFP, UNAUTHOPIZFP COPYING OP PFPPOPUC110N5 OF ANY PORTION 15 FOVPIPPFN 21 _�14 8, --7/2 131_411 2'-6y4 " I WINDOW NOTF,5; F6PF55 WINDOW: ALU PFPPOOM5 APF TO HAVE ONF ( 1) MINIMUM OWNING APFA: 5,Y 5QJAII FFFT MINIMUM OPFNING HEIGHT; 24" MINIMUM OPFNING WIPTH 20'' MAXIMUM 511-1- HFIGHT A(30VF FLOOD 44'' WINDOW FALL PP0T�CV01q: IF TNF _OM5T PAP.T OF THE OPENING OF AN OWWI3UE WINDOW 15 LOCATFP MOPS NAN 72'' A30VF FINIWFP 6PAPF OP 5UPFACF 13FLOW, THE UOWF5T PAP.T OF TNF WINDOW OPFNING 5H&I- 13F IN MINIMUM OF 36" AI30VF FINISHW FUOOP IN TNF DOOM OF VOCATION, OPWWLW WCTION OF WINPOW5 5HALL NOT PFPMIT A 4'' PIA 5PHFPF TO PA55 THROUGH OPFNING IF LOCASP WITHIN 36" OF FINI511F5) FLOOD, WINPOW5 WITH A BOTTOM 511-1- HFIGHT LE55 THEN 36 "ABOVE FINI5HW GRAPE 5HAL1- HAVE A FALU PPEVENTION PEVICF THAT COMPLIF5 WITH A5TM F 2090 IN5TALLFP, WINDOW WF_LI,: WHEN WQUIPFP FOP FMFPGFNCY F5CAPE IT 5HAW AL1 -OW THE WINDOW TO OWN FULLY. A MINIMUM NFT CLEAR APPA OF 9 5QUAPE FFFT, ANP A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 36" PACK WAY WINDOW WW1 -5 WITH A VEPTICA_ PFPTH OF MOPF THAN 44 MU5T 13E FQJIPPW WITH AN APPPOVFP LAPPED TFMWPFP WINPOW5: WINDOW 511-1 UF55 THAN 18'' A130VF TNF FLOOD, WINDOW PANF 15 GPFATFP THAT 9 5QJAPF FEET, 3ATHPOOM5, 5TAIPWAY LANPING, ANP 24'' FPOM A POOP OPFNING -- NOTE; MAIN FLOOD WINDOW HFAPFR 15 SFT AT 6'-10'' 3UILPFP TO CONFIRM WINPOW P O, WITH 5UPPLIFP PPIOP TO CON5TPUC110N P,O, MAY W APJU51'EP PFPENPANT ON WINDOW MI -II -LING PFQUIPFMFNT5 � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 u�Qw�Qau W �"a �D u z -M w�wOw o0 AQzzU ��u,� ~�wP4u WOwa�"�zQ U<0P z �o u<u R"Ww FC(� Ln u Z A 0 7 M Il..4 �z 0� A�z A �0 Lr) 0 �..I N c� M 5�CON12 FLOOD APPITION 5CA, 1/4" -1'-O" WAWN LN: I,OpI bA� F� V PAS 5CAL� 5FF PLAN WINDOW 5CHF12ULF MAPVIN WINPOW5 ANP POOP: NM3P 111W 51ZF WFCIAL NFW5 POUCH OPENING I PATIO POOP 1201-66L P.O. 121-1/4'' y,6' -B1 I 2 POU131-F HUNG CJPH-NG 1614 P,O. 11-10141, X3'-0" 3 POUI3LF HUNG CUPH-NG 3226 F WOCP V. 0. 3' -2/'' x 5 -0" 3 POUPI_F HUNG CJPH-NG 1616 2W P.Q. 3' -6y2,, x 3' -4" 5 FXI5TIN6 PATIO POOP Y POUPI_F HUNG CUPH-NG 3226 F WOCP P,O, 6' -/YV x 5' -O" 8 9 -- NOTE; MAIN FLOOD WINDOW HFAPFR 15 SFT AT 6'-10'' 3UILPFP TO CONFIRM WINPOW P O, WITH 5UPPLIFP PPIOP TO CON5TPUC110N P,O, MAY W APJU51'EP PFPENPANT ON WINDOW MI -II -LING PFQUIPFMFNT5 � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 u�Qw�Qau W �"a �D u z -M w�wOw o0 AQzzU ��u,� ~�wP4u WOwa�"�zQ U<0P z �o u<u R"Ww FC(� Ln u Z A 0 7 M Il..4 �z 0� A�z A �0 Lr) 0 �..I N c� M 5�CON12 FLOOD APPITION 5CA, 1/4" -1'-O" WAWN LN: I,OpI bA� F� V PAS 5CAL� 5FF PLAN 5TAIP,WAY NOTF5 -7 3Xj" MAX P,6S P, 10'' MIN TPFAP CUr MINIMUM HFAPP,OOM; MFA5XP, P VFFTICAULY FFOM TNF 51-OPFIP FUANF APJOININ6 TNF TFFAP N051NG 5TAIFWAY 5HALL NOT r3F LF55 THAN 36" CI -W, WIPTN ABOVE HAND FAIL ANP BELOW FFQUIFFP HFAPP,OOM 6FIPPM3 HANPFAIL 5HALL NOr PPOJFCT MOFF THAN 4/2" INTO TNF 5rAIFCA5F OP,FNING, HAND FAIL IN rO r?F UOCATFP 34'' - 38" A130VF TFFAP NOSING � � Q zw oWz�Q�� 00 U-Qw�Qau W �"a �D U) wOwOw�oO A QzzU u ~�wP4 W0waE-,P4 �wro 0� U<0P z wp4,u�u Lr) � q U AVG. F-49 13LOWN ININ5ULATION� 4 -MIL VAPOP, 13AP,JFP, 5FALFP @ 5FAM5 097 ANP FPGF5, LAP 5FAM5 6" 5/8PFYwALL z � 12 Q° A5PHALr 5HIN6LF5 15# FF�r O U 9 0 2-P,OW5 ICF ANP WATFP, 5HVI-P r N �I c� 24'' FA5T IN51PF WALL -INF 15X32" 0513 FOOF 5HFATHIN6 M 2X6 '5013-FA50A ALUMINUM 5OFFIr ANP FA5CIA COLOF; 2X6 5-U2516 %6'' OW 5HF. WEATHFP, G 4" VINYL 51PF5 ANC JAMF5 HAFPI 13UI�bING S�C1'ION THF5F FLAN5 ANP FP,INT5 FFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNTlAL P,FOP,FPTY OF TNF OWNFP,, ANP MAY I3F U5FP 13Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOP, THE P,UFP,05F 5PFCIFICALLY AUTHOPIZFP 6Y TNF OWNFP,, UNAUTHOP,IZFP COP,YIN6 OP, P,FP,FOPUCTION5 OF ANY POFTION 15 FOP,I3IPPFN WAWN LN: �Opl bA� p� V PAS 5CA-� 5FF PLAN 5HF-r; A4 4 5rAIPWAY N01E5 -7 Y4'' MAX P,6S P, 10'' MIN TP,FAP CUT MINIMUM HFAPP,OOM; MFA5UFFP VWTICALLY FFOM TNF 51-OpW PLANE POJOININ6 TNF TFFAP NOSING 5TAIFWAY 5HALL NOT [�F LF55 THAN �56'' CLFAF WIDTH APOVF HAND FAIL ANP 13F1 -OW FFQUIFFP HFAPP,OOM 60PAWF HANPFAIL 5HAL1- NOT PFOJFCT MOFF THAN 4%2" INTO TNF 5TAIFCA5F OP,FNIN6. HAND FAIL IN TO r3F LOCATED 54'' - 38" A3OVF TFFAP NOSING 2x6 51 ALUMINUM 50FFITA� COLOF, 2X6 5TU -/6" 05[ WFA11 JAMF51- THF5F P,LAN5 ANP FFINT5 FFMAIN TNF FXCLU51VF CONFIPFNI1AL FP,OP,FFTY OF TNF OWNFF, ANP MAY 13F U5FP 13Y OTHFP,5 ONLY FOP, THE P,UFF05F 5PFCIFICALLY AUTHOFIZFP 6Y THF OWNFP,, UNAUTHOP,IZW COP,YIN6 OP, FFP,FOPUCTION5 OF ANY FOF110N 15 FOP,I3IPPFN ATHING JFF ING IJC'ArION WALL zw OwZ7pzUn U�zza�'��z wo�w�woo wc!)Ww�C��'E; U-QW�aau W �"�= J z �ozo�4Uoz UWxc�n0 zz wu C4pcHnPQw� �D- wOw�H�Zd Hw�c p� U79zuxx wxou-'u U zA 0 � M u � a z 0� A zz 0 �0 N M M WAWN 13Y; �Opl la"3�ATMIN �G\1m 5� � PM 5H��T: A�? LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. jQK�' 1LIjNN�'TONI� 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER AND O.H.W. UNE (929.4) 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of�— such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. y S 88'5337" E H- 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be 50_29 existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. — Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones \ ' shown hereon.% -EXISTING ROADWAY N STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: (CRYSTAL BAY RD) ;io � " • " Denotes iron survey marker, found unless otherwise noted.10 C3 ' PARKING J ' ' A 0 PAD ' 14.1 AVE SETBACK LAKESHORE ' -------- ' C3 EXISTING ' — DECKGARA' 0B 8 GE ' ; DECK -2.3 Z— ' 9.5: 38.3 W 00 O ' JLA 01 00 EXISTING E)(ISING W fV pWELLING EXISING p DWELLING DWELLING CA 1 Ca EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS rn 1-75' SETBACK HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. _ _1.4 BI.LUMINOUS PARKING DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. I 1 38.3 PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. \ �, PATIO cn DECK 96 SQ. FT. i PATIO 120 SQ. FT. _ — TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT.50.02 BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. ���`' N 86.423$" E TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. p G f X AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. n� D. AUT1yORITY HARDCOVER % 59.0% �.� HENN jT d 6 CO. TIMBER WALLS X X '-WOOD FENCE DATE EVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY Advance WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SURVEYOR AND THnTHELA DULY REGISTERED SURVEYOR EXISTING SURVEY TODD OLSON UNDER OF THE STATEM E$fJTA. SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Surveying & Engineering, Co. 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. — DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 S1 17917 Highway No. 7 Wayne W. Preu 0 10, 20' ORONO, NIN Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 DRAWING NUMBER Phone (952) 474-7964 #43503 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 Web: www.advsur.com LICENSE NO. 170918 WP SHEET 1 OF 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "0" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted. LME ff1JVNL'TONKA ,APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER AND O.H.W. UNE (929.4) T_ \ 1 � 1 y S 88'53'37" E - 50_29 ,1 1 \1 1 I EXISTING ROADWAY--% m (CRYSTAL BAY RD) ; 1 ` I 1 � 1 , � . 1 p°r" -;...�^ �r ; 14_1 D" c _. -23 Z- 38.3 O "PROP. STOOP W --A 00 EXISTING N ti 1 I � 1 J I 1 O I I ' -75' SETBACK -1.4 AVE. LAKESHORE`SETBACK ' I 1 1 ` 1 i Vis. -s O 9.5. • 00 i PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS -P N ' (X L, EXISTING 1 HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. _P co DWELLING J PROP. DRIVEWAY 292 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. PROP. STOOP 44 SQ. FT. PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. r'1 PROP. WALK 71 SQ. FT. DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. PROP. OVERHANG 126 SQ. FT. DECK 96 SQ. FT. PATIO 120 SQ. FT. PATIO 120 SQ. FT. TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. I 1 TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,716 SQ. FT. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. HARDCOVER % 58.1% HARDCOVER % 59.0% �G�P . 1 p°r" -;...�^ �r ; 14_1 D" c _. -23 Z- 38.3 O "PROP. STOOP W --A 00 EXISTING N ti DWELLINGCIO -75' SETBACK -1.4 PATIO i 50.02 N 86'42'38" E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 1,10) V Y 1 1 1 1 1 i EXISTING GARAGE SITUMINOUS PARKING HENN. CO. F.R.% AUTHORITY X X ` WOOD FENCE vo EXISTING DWELLING RtCEivE® NOV U 8 2017 CITY OF ORONO DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY Advance WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED SURVEYOR EXISTING SURVEY 11/6/17 SHOW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TODD OLSON UNDER THE LA OF THE STATE M fl TA. SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Surveying & Engineering, Co. S 1 " 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. "`' �"'`� S DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 17917 Highway No. 7 Wayne W. Preu 0 10' 20' ORONO, MN Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 DRAWING NUMBER Web:ewwwadvsurcom LIIC4ENSENO. SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 170918 WP � SHEET 1 OF 1 Council Exhibit C 17-3981 4. #17-3981 TODD AND ANGIE OLSON, 3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:25 P.M. — 7:36 P.M. Todd Olson, Applicant, was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting variances for lake yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, hardcover, and an average lakeshore setback and driveway to exceed eight feet in the Shoreland Overlay District. The applicants are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home and will keep the perimeter walls. In addition, they plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition of an upper story, new front porch, a wider deck, and removing and replacing the driveway to better serve the property. A majority of the home is currently within the 75 -foot lake yard setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story is also an increase in the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11 feet to 21 feet, which increases the massing in the average lakeshore setback. The deck will not encroach any closer to the lake than the existing deck. The one -stall tuck -under garage will be moved to the east side of the home to allow for a two -stall tuck -under garage. The driveway will be moved to service the garage and is 16 feet wide where eight feet is the maximum width in the Shoreland setback zone. Hardcover will also be impacted with relocation of the driveway. The home currently sits six feet from the rear property where a 30 -foot setback is required. The home is proposed to remain at the 6 -foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a rear yard variance. The home also currently sits 1.4 feet from the east side property line where a 7.5 -foot side yard setback is required. The second story addition to the home will increase the massing of the structure within the setback and requires a side yard variance. There is also a 75 -foot lake yard setback on this lot, with the home currently sitting 50.9 feet from the lake. The setback will remain at 50.9 feet with the addition of the second story, thus creating the need for a lake yard variance. The applicants are proposing to remove existing hardcover within the 75 -foot lake yard but will be adding a new 16 -foot wide driveway for access to the home. A new proposed walkway will also be within the lake yard setback. There is currently 48.4 percent hardcover on the property, but with the elimination of the existing driveway and parking pad and the addition of the new driveway, the hardcover will be reduced to 47.3 percent. Finally, the applicant is also proposing a new front porch forward of the existing home footprint at 54 feet from the lake, but it will be set back behind the deck, which is 50.9 feet from the lake, and does not encroach into the average lakeshore setback. An existing deck will be widened as part of the project which will increase the massing in the lake yard. Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living space challenges, which does not result in an expansion of structural coverage of hardcover. The affected neighbor's views of the lake are not currently impacted by the applicant's property because it is set back behind the neighbors' homes. The applicant also has very few options for expansion or addition to the home. Staff, however, does not feel there are practical difficulties for the expanded deck and the average lakeshore setback variance. No public comments have been received on this application. Landgraver asked if other homes in the area have been built up similar to what is being proposed. Oakden indicated the addition would match the characteristics of the neighborhood Thiesse asked if this neighborhood is expanding. Oakden stated it is and that this neighborhood consists of fairly small lots. Todd Olson, Applicant, stated the setbacks are a practical difficulty for adding anything onto the home and that the only reason why they want to widen the deck is to have a two -car garage and not a single -car garage. Olson stated one of the main reasons for the remodel and addition is to have a two -car garage and that most of the neighbors have a similar design to what they are proposing. Lemke asked if the heights of the buildings on either side are the same. Olson indicated one neighbor is slightly higher than what they are proposing but the other neighbor's house is the same height. Olson displayed a picture of the neighbor's house. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Thiesse stated the need for a two -car garage in Minnesota is a practical difficulty, which requires the wider deck. Lemke commented the proposal seems reasonable. Landgraver moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3981, Todd and Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, granting of variances to the lake yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and driveway to exceed eight feet in the Shoreland Overlay District. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 9/20/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 11/8/2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 1/8/2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: November 20, 2017 Council Exhibit D 17-3981 Subject: 17-3981, Todd and Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for lake yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, Hardcover to exceed 25%, Average lakeshore setback and driveway to exceed 8 feet in the shoreland overlay district. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variances. Staff recommends for the Planning Commission to discuss the practical difficulties for the average lakeshore setback variance request. Background Todd and Angie Olson are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home. They will keep the perimeter walls and plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition of an upper story, new front porch, a wider deck and removing and replacing the driveway to better serve the property. Majority of the home is currently placed within the 75' lake yard setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story addition is an increase in the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are asking for setback variances for this addition. They are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11' to 21' which increases the massing in the average lakeshore setback but it is proposed to encroach no closer to the lake then the existing deck. They will also move the 1- stall tuck -under garage to the east (other) side of the home which has room to create a 2 stall tuck -under garage. They are proposing to move the driveway which alters the existing hardcover on the site. The proposed driveway will serve the double garage and is 16' wide where 8' is the maximum width in the shoreland setback zone. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 and 78-1680 Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1C Required Existing Proposed (No Changes) Rear 30' 6' No Change West Side 7.5' 9.5' 9.5' (Meets requirement) East Side 7.5' 1.4' No Change Lakeshore 75' 50.9' No Change Average Lakeshore Does not meet 50.9' 50.9 ' FILE # 17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 2 of 6 Section 350- Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 4,676 s.f. (0.1 acre) 50' @ 75' 50'@ OHWL Section 78-1403- Structural Cover Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 4,676 s.f. (0.1 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. Proposed Existing: 1092 (meets requirement) Proposed: 1136 s.f. (meets requirement) • On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 3720 s.f. 930 s.f. 1802 s.f. 1760 s.f. Tier 1 (4676-956) (25%) (48.4%) (47.3%) (Lot -Road) The hardcover and land area created by Crystal Bay Road have been removed from the hardcover calculations of the subject parcel. Applicable Regulations: Rear Yard (78-350) There is a 30 foot rear yard setback for this lot. The home currently sits 6 feet from the rear property. They applicant is proposing to add an upper story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 6 foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a rear yard variance. Side Yard (78-350) There is a 7.5 foot side yard setback for this lot. They home currently sits 1.4 feet from the east side property line. They applicant is proposing to add a 2nd story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 1.4 foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a side yard variance. 75 Foot Lake Yard Setback (78-1680) There is a 75 foot lake yard setback for this lot. They home currently sits 50.9 feet from the lake. They applicant is proposing to add an upper story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 50.9 foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a lake yard variance. They are also removing existing hardcover within the 75' lake yard and are proposing to add a new 16 foot wide driveway for access to the home. A new proposed walkway is within the lakeyard setback. FILE # 17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 3 of 6 The applicant is also proposing a new front porch forward of the existing home footprint (54 feet the lake) but it will be set back behind the deck which is 50.9 feet from the lake and it does not encroach in the average lakeshore setback. They are proposing to widen an existing deck on the home which increases the massing in the lakeyard. Hardcover to Exceed 25% in Tier 1 (78-1700) The applicant currently has 48.4% (1802 s.f.) hardcover existing on the parcel. They are changing the structure coverage with the addition of the covered porch but they propose to decrease hardcover overall. They are proposing to eliminate the existing driveway and parking pad and are proposing to install a new 2 stall driveway for access to the garage which is less hardcover overall on the site. The new proposed hardcover is 47.3% (1760s.f.) overall. DrivewaV to exceed 8' wide in Shoreland OverlaV District (78-1282) A driveway no wider than eight feet is permitted in the shoreland or tributary setback zone if the property has no other frontage on or access to a public or private road. The project is proposing to remove the existing 8' wide driveway and parking pad and replace it with a 16' wide driveway to serve the new 2 stall garage within the 75 foot shoreland setback zone. Average Lakeshore Setback There is an existing deck that encroaches into the average lakeshore setback by 6 feet. They are proposing to maintain that encroachment of 6 feet but will be widening the deck so there will be more square footage of the deck located in the average lakeshore setback. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The rear, side, and lake yard setback and the wider driveway variance are in harmony with the purpose of the ordinances. The hardcover is proposed to decrease being the site closer to conformance with the ordinances. The lot includes challenges with the small size in the LR -1C zoning district and the orientation towards the lake. The lot is also challenged with the existing Crystal Bay Road that runs through the lake yard of FILE # 17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 4 of 6 the property. The average lakeshore setback is proposed to stay the same distance for the new deck compared to the existing deck but will increase the square footage in this setback. The applicant should demonstrate practical difficulties to support the expansion in this location. The visual impact to the property to the east is somewhat minimal as the existing garage in that location blocks lake view. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing to keep the existing foundation to maintain the existing footprint of the home. The proposing upper level addition is a reasonable use of the property. There is no space to build a conforming structure. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant is working within the existing footprint of the home, which was not created by the current landowner and will be maintaining the existing rear, side, lake yard setbacks. They hardcover, driveway width and average lakeshore setback are all being altered from the existing home. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition and remodel of the existing home will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The small building envelope with the substandard lot, and the right of way that passed through the lake yard of the property create a difficulties that are unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Crystal Bay Road is relatively unique within the LR -1C district due to the shallowness and narrowness of the lots, the road location, the proximity to the lake, and the existing Hennepin County Rail property to the rear. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this to be true to allow for the upper addition of the home and to address the driveway access for the garage. FILE # 17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 5 of 6 The Commission should discuss whether the applicant has satisfied the practical difficulty requirements to support the variance from the average lakeshore setback. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicant has stated additional living space will alleviate a practical difficulty relating to the existing space within the home on the property. The property is unique in size as well as location between Crystal Bay Road and a regional trail. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status This site has sanitary sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living space challenges which does not result in an expansion of structural coverage or of hardcover. The affected neighbor's views of the lake are not currently impacted by the applicant's property because it is set back behind the neighbors homes; and they will likely not have views of the lake impacted bythe applicant's proposed upper addition, front stoop and deck. The applicant has very options for expansion or addition to the home of the property. While the expanded deck does not seem to impact the neighbors or their views, staff feels the average lakeshore setback variance request for the expanded deck is lacking practical difficulties for staff to recommend approval. Engineer Comments The engineer will complete his review with the building permit. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the FILE # 17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 6 of 6 essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? Planning Staff Recommendation 1. The Planning Commission may approve the some or all of the variance applications. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances, the Commission should provide their findings and practical difficulty analysis supporting the approvals; or 2. The Planning Commission could deny one or more variances; or 3. The Commission could approve the lakeyard, side yard, rear yard setbacks, hardcover to exceed 25% and driveway to exceed 8 feet wide in the shoreland overlay district variances but suggest the applicant to revise the plan so there will not be additional massing in the average lakeshore setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Adjacent Property Owner Signature Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 9 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: #17-3986 — Travis DeJong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail, Conditional Use Permit — Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Consent Agenda Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding a conditional use permit (CUP) for a permanent dock installation. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on October 17, 2017. The 60 -Day review period expires on December 16, 2017. 3. Background. The applicant proposes to replace their existing seasonal dock on their property with a new permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) regulates docks on the Lake. A LMCD permit was issued on November 20th; the installation will be done over the winter. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On November 20th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 6 to 0 in favor of a motion to approve with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and b. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. 5. Public Comment. No comments have been received on this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the CUP to allow the permanent dock to be installed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans & Survey Exhibit C. LMCD Permit Exhibit D. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit E. PC Staff Report Prepared By: VY1GG References PC Exhibits 10/16/17. Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Dock Plans Exhibit D. Property Owners List Exhibit E. Plat Map Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -bV F slr. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1118 FILE NO. 17-3986 WHEREAS, Travis DeJong (hereinafter "the Applicant") the owner of the property located at 1270 Wildhurst Trail within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City"), Hennepin County PID 07-117-23-31-0026, and legally described as follows: Tract A, RLS No. 1132, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1118(3) for construction of a permanent dock extending into the floodplain; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 17-3986. 2. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on November 20, 2017 and recommended approval of the CUP based on the following findings: a. The Property is located within the LR -113 One Family Lakeshore Residential District. b. The dock is a water use feature and its extension into the floodplain is reasonable c. The dock will be built of sturdy materials designed for the specific use, minimizing upkeep and annual maintenance. 3. Conditional Use Permit Analysis. The City Council makes the following findings with regard to the criteria necessary for the granting of a conditional use permit. Page 1 of 4 F slr. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. a. Consistent with the community management plan; The Property is zoned and used for residential use. Docks are anticipated accessory uses on lakeshore residential properties. This criterion is met. b. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Docks are listed as allowed accessory uses in residential zoning districts. This criterion is met. c. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The dock does not require excessive additional public services. d. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The dock will not increase demands on the water or waste water treatment systems. e. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The dock improvement is not expected to generate additional demand. f. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. g. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. g. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. h. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The dock will be used for residential, non-commercial uses consistent with the surrounding properties. This criterion is met. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; Docks are a common improvement in floodplains, no buffering or screening is recommended. This criterion is met. Page 2 of 4 F slr. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; This criterion is met. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This residential dock on a single family property is not expected to generate excessive traffic or be an inconvenience to adjoining properties. This criterion is met. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The dock is constructed of wood, and will be consistent in appearance with other docks in the area. This criterion is met. m. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant will be informed of this requirement. All lighting shall conform and be directed downward and away from neighboring residences, and n. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. No evidence has been suggested that the dock will be hazardous. This criterion is met. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the Applicant's request would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1118 for construction of a permanent dock extending into the floodplain, subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval is for dock depicted on the survey and plans attached as Exhibits A & B. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of Page 3 of 4 F slr. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 11th day of December, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 4 of 4 ¢� E ig0 R r&Q.2>��w All, 1 A % $o O w €e $ t x n m �' `0 ;7 roti ftl �n n s y 23: --3-G r �° z�F--t i f r r r r� Q y r a x r� It ate. PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL Ff+LfPtFE;HS. VARp s4RY F.Y4RS, LANG pI.ARNCks - t� Customer Name Phone DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner 4554 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 wvwv.dockandlift.com DOCK SKETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 Fax' 952/471-2608 e-mail info@dockandlift.com Customer Address Customer City, State & Zip t r� i 1 Date a/1 'j !r" lidai 9 i i i j Y k i i 4 f t • ` t i i - -- _ i A .. __. ...s.«. _ ...........c..._ ----' .. ... __. ...s _. . f � t- • ! e 4 i i e T • t , t_....i•._ ...s.».. ;.... r1.»».... ....t..... .....,_. .. ! • t i t i t t i i t , 1 t i i • ..._i..w ...L.___ p. .._p... .F .....t... __. .. d. ..L.... ...L_._ .,.. _...a... .4 __...F.....4.. ...-k _..«i..._-�»... ... .._. i ' e • ! i + . i i i e i ... ..... ._ .. ..�!. .._4..- i.---�.._ ...,�.0-AL---- 1......i._._ ....... __ ... 3 ... .. .._, ... _... n t... .i.... .. ...y. ..�.. . ___ .. .. ` .._ ._ • _ ' t a a i• .y. . . ..� k i e 3 a 4 t a i s. # 3 S i i t • a t • , RgCeIVD 50 00 1 '72017 Y t r .................. r..- n......v_................. n_.««_............na.,.._._.._.x...... ...«.... t i w t "' 86. .CITY-bP dRONO- DocK LIFT S,•::- n % . DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner DOCK SKETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com e-mail., infogdockandlift. corn Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail �r� ° el �J: e _ s fa i Lid 1r� G�,�� ��lL� � U , a. _ ,►.� IECEI'I ED ---- ---- --------- ---- ----`-------- -_ ------ OCT 1 7 Z017 r; ---------- .__»»#139 ----------- ----------- C1j1(©F0f0N0 POCK& LIFT S.'.- .. D S. ...t. DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner DOCK SKETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com e-mail., infodwdockandlift.corn Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip pate Customer E -Mail , i AL r , . - - � tl ---------- -------------- ------------------------ »-».--..»..__-. ..4..' -_ - _- -- «-- ..» .. .. z , i £ a z t r z..«... _ ..«... .. ..... i -n .. «n ..n ..�.. ---- ---- -- _ •�---- -_---•------- _ _ - - - _ - - .4 r . tl R - _ , r r � RRk _ tli t ---- t ..._.... ,-------•«_ .«... 3_9_���«». - a/�i M 17-387 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DOCK 8c LIFT, INC. so nV mu n rm n V t c Mn 1 1 Q9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Tract A, Registered Land Survey Number 1132, files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, shed, and all visible "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed dock, and boat lift thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 1.4 CONTOUR - (O.H.W.) / �o 0 PROPOSED e.0 DOCKS ad 0 o � Go '.' 48.0 100, .......... OUT FROM O.H.W. II s d- N L0 Wo 0000 I N NN oo. W 0 L 0 0 0 0 W V) 0 EL0 W EL 0 •U U-) Q) o ao � 041 O U L- � Z U �� .5-0 � -0 C: E i U y J C i a fr O� O o. C N O N C N O J C 41 NT,�- -so--E o O +� N �+ T� O D CrN Cr E� N O N 00 U Q CD a) (n c o 3 a W 0 L 0 0 0 0 W V) 0 EL0 W EL Customer Name Phone DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 www.dockandfift.com DOCK SKETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 Pax.' 9521471-2608 e-mail.' info@dockandlift.com Customer Address , :. W1��tirur5-�- Customer City, State & Zip r 1r`a x Date � /ro hof04 040<471" ------------ a 1 J . J '.... ± ..«w`-.. _ -Y. .. .�. .i.._ 'Y--.. .1....... ...T ...4._...�... ... .. _;. .......... _ 3 { S • t ' i s , s ; i . i e t � • 1 r r 9 ! 4 � � • • i s , i o Nk.......... ......... • . ! . t ,.. _ ...... .•........... w..__•__.r ; - - s .. ...,_ ,--- .._. ...... f................ • a = 1 A t s j -. ... -----E _,.. a i .i s •9 r- • i e • i 3 � 3 r i -------------- + r . ' r ; > • i -....k..» _...L...x J• .._;.«. .6.... .i... x..d.a ..R..x. ...L_.. .S.. x..,_ ' , 3 [ s ' .t. a v i ! . i 4 . I i 3 ! i a ' • i .... .�. ..._ «. v .. ..ti............................... . ___ • ..x .. 1 ... .•___` • - .x ° ___ .x. r .. ! i •___ .. ..._ ...4 ...�... ...y_.. .. _ r ..1.....*..._................ ^ A - k• t • e a - t. . i r r 5 i : - • i a ' £ y _ ._..ir... a.. __.F. ,.. .. E __ w1 ... .__ , ry ;.... ....1•----- .. .- «'4 w...J._.. t__.. J_-... ._..s. .. 3 .f. ..... J.-. t x { OCT 1 �20i7 ---- #--3.9-8'6_. DOCK& LIFT DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner DOCK SKETCH Phone. 952/477-8343 or 952/474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/477-2608 www.dockandlift.com e-mail: infogdockandlift. corn Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail =>.�__ DOCK& LIFT . S"" DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner DOCK SKETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com e-mail: infogdockandlift.com Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail e a � o a . t a x a s . a --- ---. _'---_-s_--_ _`x.. »-o.-'---f .. ... .. ..�_.. _ — .... ... .... ............... .. .. .. —_'_ ..».... ..»..»..-----» a$a . .�..� s ....... a a f a — -- a ;i` f V�A Nix J� o RE;VEx MSNNET0\ y � Y • IV /�qw /1W • �a�AT10K D�5 Property Owner: Property Address PID: Date of Permit: Code Section: Shoreline: Approved BSUs: Municipality: Bay: APPROVED LMCD PERMANENT DOCK PERMIT 17-112-18 NON-COMMERCIAL, NON -MULTIPLE Travis and Julie DeJong 1270 Wildhurst Trail Orono, MN 55364 07-117-23-31-0015 11/20/2017 2.06, Permanent Non -Multiple Non -Commercial Docks 110 feet Up to Four (Subject to 2.02, Subd. 3) Orono Forest Lake I. Permit Overview A permanent, non -multiple dock structure is approved as follows: A straight dock with an overall footprint of 50 feet wide and no more than 100 feet in length as it extends into the lake from the OHW mark (929.4ft). Length is in compliance with LMCD Code Section 2.01. Two boat storage units; however, additional watercraft may be allowed as prescribed by LMCD Code. Approximately 35 pilings; piling spacing varies from 4 to 8 feet. Some modifications may be necessary at the time of installation. The dock decking/structure does not exceed 8 feet in both length and width at any location. The entire structure is expected to be no longer than 100 feet long to be in compliance with LMCD Code Section 2.01. A planned 15 -foot setback from the southern extended side site line and a setback greater than 20 feet from the northern side site line. These setbacks in compliance with the requirements found in LMCD Code Section 2.01. Setbacks also apply to storage of any watercraft and other structures. II. Site -Specific Permit Conditions The approved permit is subject to the following: The construction of the dock is subject to the approved site plan (dated 04/24/1997; received 10/18/2017). The location and storage of all watercraft, structures, and similar must not extend further than 100 feet from the 929.4 shoreline, as shown in the site plan. o For instance, overhang of the watercraft stored in both the canopy and proposed boat lift will be limited since they may not extend beyond the 100 -foot linear extension due to the curvature of the 929.4 contour and associated curvature of the 100 -foot linear extension from the 929.4 contour. III. Standard Permit Conditions An as -built survey must be submitted upon completion of the dock installation. 1270 Wildhurst Trail Permanent Dock Permit Page 1 of 2 LMCD must be notified at the completion of the installation to schedule a final inspection. No changes may occur to the permanent dock for size, location, or configuration without seeking a new permanent dock permit. However, a new permit is not required for repair or replacement of the permanent dock if you do not alter the size, type, location, or configuration. Any structures placed as part of this permit shall be maintained in good condition and shall promptly be removed, together with any watercraft stored on them, if this permit is ever revoked or rendered null and void. This property is not eligible for a de-icing license as defined by LMCD Code Section 2.09. More information about de-icing operations is available in the LMCD Code Section 2.09. Adjustments to the dock may be required if environmental concerns arise, navigational safety or unreasonable limitation to lake access occurs for adjacent properties due to the dock installation or use. Approval from the LMCD does not absolve you of the need to secure all necessary permits or approval from all governmental agencies. Any changes to the property such as subdivision or combination may render the permit null and void and requires a review by the LMCD Executive Director within forty-five (45) days of the change to the property. Use of the Lake shall at all times remain subject to regulation by the LMCD to assure the public of reasonable and equitable access to the Lake. The issuance of this permit shall grant no vested rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka. IV. Purpose/Impact To provide a secure docking area for the resident's watercraft. V. MN DNR General Permit #97-6098 The MN DNR General Permit issued to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) requires specific standards be met prior to issuing dock licenses. One standard is to obtain review and comments of the proposed application from the MN DNR Fisheries Manager and Hydrologist. This application was provided for review and comments to the MN DNR and representatives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City of Orono. No comments or objections were received. VI. Permit Approval Pursuant to LMCD Code Section 2.06, Permanent Non -Multiple Non -Commercial Docks, this permanent dock permit is granted based on compliance with the approved site plan. Violations of the provisions of the District's Code of Ordinances are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days and/or imposition of a fine of not more than $1,000.00. Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this 20th day of November, 2017. Attest: Vickie Schleuning, Execut ector 1270 Wildhurst Trail Permanent Dock Permit Page 2 of 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 5. #17-3986 TRAVIS DeJONG, 1270 WILDHURST TRAIL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:36 P.M. — 7:41 P.M. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) regulates docks on the lake and has not yet issued the permit. The proposed dock will extend approximately 100 feet from the shore and appears that it will meet all LMCD required setbacks. Orono's concurrent jurisdiction over permanent docks is primarily via floodplain regulations, which provide no significant standards pertinent to the approval of permanent docks. Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures, so with the exception of the RS District, someone cannot have a permanent or seasonal dock without a principal structure. This property is zoned LR -1B. The City will require that a zoning permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock. To date, no public comments have been received. Curtis noted last month the neighboring property to the south was approved for a permanent dock. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. Thiesse asked if the dock would go along with the rental of the house. Curtis indicated it would and that the dock cannot be rented separately. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke asked whether the City has any specifications for permanent docks. Curtis stated Orono does not and that the LMCD has good oversight of permanent docks. The applicant was not present. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Lemke moved, Landgraver seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3986, Travis DeJong,1270 Wildhurst Trail, granting of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 10/17/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 10/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 12/16/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 20 November 2017 Subject: #17-3986, Travis DeJong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail, Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant wishes to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) regulates docks on the Lake. Applicable Regulations: CUP (Section 78-1117) Floodway means the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. Permanent docks may be allowed as a conditional use within the floodway following the standards and procedures set forth in City Code Section 78-1148 and further subject to the standards set forth in Code Section 78-1119. The LMCD has not yet issued the permit; however, the proposed dock will extend approximately 100 feet from the shore, and appears that it will meet all LMCD-required setbacks. Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-916 & 78-1119) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; Docks are anticipated accessory uses on lakeshore residential properties. This criterion is met. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Docks are listed as allowed accessory uses in residential zoning districts. This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. This criterion is met. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Not applicable. FILE # 17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 2 of 4 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The permanent dock is not expected to generate an excessive demand for public services. This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed permanent dock is not expected to impair property values or impact permitted uses in the area. This criterion is met. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD. This criterion is met. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; This criterion is met. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This residential dock on a single family property is not expected to generate excessive traffic or be an inconvenience to adjoining properties. This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD. This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant will be informed of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This criterion is met. Additional standards for floodway conditional uses (Sec. 78-1119). A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the one percent chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Accessory structures. Accessory structures, as identified in section 78-1118(1), may be permitted, provided that: (1) Structures are not intended for human habitation; (2) Structures will have a low flood damage potential; FILE # 17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 3 of 4 (3) Structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (4) Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (5) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the state building code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (6) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the state building code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and b. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (d) Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (e) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the one percent chance or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. (f) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Orono's concurrent jurisdiction over permanent docks is primarily via the City's floodplain regulations, which provide no significant standards pertinent to the approval of permanent docks. Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures, so with the exception of the RS District, one cannot have a permanent or seasonal dock without a principal residence structure. This property is zoned LR -1B. There are no specific Building Code construction standards for docks. The City will require that a FILE # 17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 4 of 4 zoning permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock and action of this CUP. Permanent docks (i.e. those docks with permanent pilings which cannot be removed without heavy equipment) sometimes result in requests by property owners for winter de-icing, to avoid ice damage. The proposed dock will be located in a fairly well protected area, so the potential for ice damage or the need for de-icing is relatively minimal. There appear to be other permanent docks in the area, and the city has received no documented problems or issues. Another potential concern would be whether the work is in a sensitive habitat or spawning area, and whether the permanent dock might affect navigation or winter vehicular traffic on the lake. Neither of these issues are apparent with this application. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Dock Plans Exhibit D. Property Owners List Exhibit E. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 10 Item Description: 2018 Public Works Plan Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Public Works Director/City Engineer Date: December 11, 2017 Agenda Public Works Director/ Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to gain Council approval to the 2018 Public Works Plan. 2. Background. The 2018 Public Works Plan is an effort to improve the planning and budgeting of Public Works and Engineering activities for the City of Orono. The intent of the plan is to: a. Provide an increased level of detail and refinement on those items from the Capital Improvement plan (CIP) that are scheduled for the upcoming calendar and fiscal year. b. Improve the coordination/timing of projects. c. Provide City Council a comprehensive list of work for approval early in the year in conjunction with the CIP and Budget approvals. d. Ensure that the Public Works and Engineering Department's priorities and work items are meeting Council intent and direction. e. Identify items for planning and engineering the year prior to their execution. 3. 2018 Public Works Plan. The 2018 Public Works plan is attached as Exhibit A. Upon approval, the public works and engineering staff will begin executing the plan. Many of the projects will require further Council action for design approvals and/or award of contracts. 4. Engineer Proposals. Bolton and Menk, Inc (BMI) has prepared proposals for the Engineering and planning of projects in support of the 2018 Public Works plan. (Exhibits B -C) Project Exhibit Proposal (Not to Exceed) 2018 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation B $16,400 2018 Pond Assessments C $10,000 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the 2018 Public Works Plan and associated engineer proposals. Exhibits Exhibit A. 2018 Public Works Plan Exhibit B. BMI 2018 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Proposal Exhibit C. BMI 2018 Pond Assessment Proposal Prepared By: Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -19a 2018 Public Works Plan The 2018 Public Work Plan describes the planned activities of the Public Works and Engineering Department broken down by functional area. Once approved by the City Council it will be the guiding work document for the Department's activities in 2018. Table of Contents Public Works Overview 2 Public Works Plan by Function 3 Engineering 3 Equipment 4 Facilities 5 Parks 6 Sewer 8 Water 10 Storm Water 11 Streets 13 Maintenance District Map 15 Project Map 16 References: City Council 2016 Goals Park Commission 2017 Goals/Priorities 2008-2030 Community Management Plan Capital Investment Plan 2018 Draft Budget Water System Plan, 2013 Well Head Protection Plan, 2013 Pavement Management Plan, 2014 Public Works and Engineering Department Overview Vision: Making people's lives better through the services we provide each day. Mission: Orono Public Works enhances the safety, welfare and livability of the community by providing and managing infrastructure and services for Water, Sewer, Facilities, Streets and Parks. Goals: • Proactively maintain the City's infrastructure thru established and aggressive preventative maintenance programs • Develop, support and retain a qualified, motivated and well-trained work force • Provide a responsive, respectful, customer service oriented focus in all we do • Ensure construction and maintenance activities are conducted to standard in a fiscally and environmentally responsible way • Identify and champion sustainable funding for Public Works services Organization: Public Works Director: Adam Edwards, P.E. Streets and Storm Sewer Utilities and Facilities Parks & Golf Course Engineering Supervisor: David (DJ) Supervisor: Scott Supervisor: Jason Goehring City Engineer: Adam Edwards, P.E. Goman Oberai er • Equipment Maintenance • Sanitary sewer system • Parks • Design, management and • Municipal Street Signage o Lift stations • Playgrounds construction of the cities infrastructure • Residential Street Lights • Water production & • Beaches • Implements the SWPPP, NPDES, • Snow Plowing distribution • City docks Well Head Protection, and Pavement • Street Repairs o Fire hydrants • City grounds Management plans. • Roadside Tree Trimming o Meter reading • Ice rinks • Reviews Construction and Zoning • Sidewalks o Water meters • Trails permit applications (Grading and • Drainage o Water Quality Report Manage and maintain a 9 hole Erosion) • Storm Water System • Underground utility municipal Golf Course Support PB&Z property complaints. • Street Sweeping locates • City buildings 6 Maintenance Workers Clubhouse Mgr (Seasonal) Engineering Consulting Firm: 1 Maintenance Worker (Seasonal) 4 Maintenance Workers Bolton and Menk, Inc 6 Clubhouse Attendants (Seasonal) Dave Martini, P.E. Engineering Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Rate Study Analyze Utility needs and develop The Last Rate Study was completed in 2009 $ 2,000 Water, Sewer proposed Utility Rate Changes for next 5 and projected rates through 2017. and Storm yrs. water Funds Parks and Open Rewrite the parks and open space chapter Required as part of the Comprehensive plan $ 2,000 Operating Space by Met Council Budgets Comprehensive (Labor) Plan Update Transportation Rewrite the transportation chapter Required as part of the Comprehensive plan $ 2,000 Operating Comprehensive by Met Council Budgets Plan Update (Labor) Sanitary Sewer Rewrite the sanitary sewer chapter Required as part of the Comprehensive plan $ 2,000 Operating Comprehensive by Met Council Budgets Plan Update (Labor) 2019 Street Projects Prepare engineering plans for 2019 Prepare for Road Maintenance Projects for $ 24,000 PMF Design and Streets projects to include: East Long 2019. Engineering Lake Road, Garden Lane, Windjammer, Lyman Avenue, Tonkaview Lane, Chevy Chase Drive, Kenwood Way and Casco Circle Fleet / Equipment Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Replace Dump Replace truck with a double axel dump The plow truck is beyond it useful life. This $ 225,000 Equipment truck with Plow # truck with plow, sander and prewetting is the 4rd of 4 PW's large dump truck/ plow Outlay Fund 425 equipment. This truck will be pallet fleet. The truck is used for general street capable to allow for change out of the maintenance, hauling of material and snow payload in order to facilitate different removal. While the dual axel and pallet capabilities on the same prime mover. arm add to the cost of this vehicle, they will allow for saving as we reduce the number of prime movers we have in the department as we alletize ourspecialty equipment. Replace pick up Replace truck. The truck has been in service for 20 years $ 30,000 Equipment Truck #210. and is in poor condition. This truck is used Outlay Fund for parks maintenance. Replace pick up Replace truck. The truck has been in service for 23 years $ 30,000 Equipment Truck #610. and is in poor condition. This truck is used Outlay Fund for golf course maintenance. Purchase Mower Procure mower for use at Big Island The mower will be used for mowing big $ 7,000 Equipment island. The mower will be prepositioned at Outlay Fund big island in order to reduce the need for barge transportation back and forth to the island. Replace fairway Replace mower The existing mower is at the end of its $ 30,000 Equipment mower #601 useful life. Turf maintenance requires Outlay Fund specialized equipment for the various conditions. The existing mower is 19 years old. Purchase Brine Procurement of a brine maker for winter Anti -icing provides significant cost, safety, $ 60,000 Equipment Maker street maintenance. and environmental Outlay Fund benefits. By applying chemical freeze - point -depressant materials before a storm, you can prevent snow and ice from bonding to the pavement. Having our own capability will reduce time and costs traveling back and forth to collect the brine. Facilities Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Cost Funding Source Public Works This project will include the installation of The project is intended to improve security $ 26,000 Building Security Fencing chain link fencing and an automation gate and safety at Public Works by better Fund system at the public works facility. controlling access to the material yard. Brush Site Fencing This project includes fencing off the brush The city has had the aspiration of offering a $ 20,000 Community site brush site service to our residents. We have investment provided service after storms at the Fund McCulley road site. Over the last 12 months we have experimented with leaving the site open year round hover many contractors and no Orono residents have been taking advantage of the site. Parks Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Basket Ball Court Proposed improvements include marking This is a Park Commission Priority Park for $ 28,000 Park Fund Surfacing - Navarre trails, removing buckthorn, 2018. The project is dependent upon reestablishment of hilltop pasture area receiving a grand from Hennepin County. (tree removal, grass seeding),parking lot improvements. GC Clubhouse Evaluate and seal the south foundation The south foundation wall of the Clubhouse $ 10,000 GC Operating Foundation wall of the Golf course club House. is showing signs of water penetration. The Budget Restoration wall needs to be evaluated and sealed. GC Porch/ Patio Construct a 900 sq ft accessible deck on The Parks commission has identified the $ 47,000 Park Fund the south west side of the clubhouse. need for a deck and a need for the golf course. Golf Course This project would remove approximately Sediment had built up on the bottom of the $ 35,000 Storm Water Irrigation Pond 1 ft of sediment from the bottom of the irrigation pond over the past several years Dredging Golf course irrigation pond. reducing the pond capacity and impacting pump operation. GC Cart Parking Construction of a retaining wall, fence and The construction of a deck on the clubhouse $ 28,925 Park Fund dirt work to create a new golf cart parking will eliminate the current golf cart parking area. area. In addition recent increases in course use have resulted in an increased number of carts at the course. GC Fairway Installation of drain tile on Fairways 1, 7 For the past several years the Golf Course $ 13,100 Storm Water Drainage and 8. has been suffering from drainage issues. The system of drain tiles that do exist are very old and no longer serve their purpose. GC Fest Tent Area Preparation of a site for a 40x60 fest tent. The Parks commission has identified the $ 1,800 Park Fund Work will include removal of trees, need for an area to place a fest tent golf grading and seeding. course. Currently the ability to host events at the golf course is limited by the capacity of the clubhouse. Big Island Planning Prepare a conceptual plan with cost In order to inform decision making and $ 12,000 Park Fund estimates including ADA accessible move forward with planning and applying pathways and destinations throughout for grant opportunity and master plan is park, dock area improvements, overlook / required pavilion area, beach improvements, and restroom facilities. Plan will include a site map, programming level estimates and a report. Bederwood Park Prepare a conceptual plan with cost The Park Commission desires to improve $ 2,000 Park Improvement estimates for improvements to Bedersood the park. Operating Planning Park (Labor) Sanitary Sewer Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Monitoring and This project will see the provision of This is a continuation/ expansion of the $ 26,000 Sewer Fund Alarm Upgrade electronic monitoring of 4 additional Lift project begun in 2016. As of 2017 the city Stations. This project will has 30/46 lift stations being electronically upgrade/replace components of the monitored. The electronic monitoring monitoring system including antennas, system being used has exceeded its useful cabling, and uninterruptable power supply life. The remaining lift stations are (UPS) dependent upon audible and visual alarms to provide notification of mechanical issues. The provision of electronic monitoring for all of the city's lift stations will improve response time to issues, reduce backup incidents and provide real time monitoring and reporting for accountability. 2018 Sanitary This Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into $ 273,180 Sewer Fund Sewer Upgrades will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIDP) the Sanitary sewer systems. The lining (CIDP and Manhole lining approximately 4,500 feet of process creates and new durable pipe Sealing) infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer within the older pipe at a much reduced pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid cost from open curing or directionally replacement. drilling in order to replace the older pipe. Lift Station This project will rehabilitate 2 of the Rehabilitating 2 lift stations per year is part $ 112,000 Sewer Fund Rehabilitation for City's 46 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation of the city's preventative maintenance plan. GS#2 and LS#9 includes the inspection, and replacement Allows City to provide extensive of a lift stations piping, motors, pumps maintenance to each Lift Station once and control as well as repairs wet well. every 23 years. The Lift Stations identified for 2018 are Grinder Station #2 (1082 Ferndale Rd W) and Lift Station #9 (1580 Bohns Point Rd). Sewer inspection, This project includes the cleaning and This project is part of the City preventative $ 47,270 Sewer Fund maintenance and inspection of 1/5 of the City's sewer maintenance program. The results of the flushing of District mains. inspection are used to determine future 5 maintenance needs. Lift Station annual Annual Inspection of all Lift Stations Preventive maintenance inspections to $ 4,000 Sewer inspections and determine maintenance needs. Operating maintenance Backup Generators This project will provide a backup This project is part of a systematic effort to $ 75,000 Sewer Fund for LS#5 and LS generator for Lift Station #5 (351 West provide backup power to critical City #15 Lake Street) which services the sanitary infrastructure. sewer system north of Stubbs Bay and for Lift Station #15 (13 75 Vine Place) which services the sanitary sewer system to the west of vine place. Forest Arms Sewer This Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project Sewer main was installed in 1970. The $ 92,400 Sewer Fund Rehabilitation w/ will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIDP) most cost effective time to replace the pipe Road Project lining approximately 1680 feet of is when the road is under construction. infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement. West Lafayette This Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project Sewer main was installed in 1969. The $ 44,000 Sewer Fund Sewer will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIDP) most cost effective time to replace the pipe Rehabilitation with lining approximately 800 feet of is when the road is under construction. Road construction infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement Old Crystal Bay Replacement of the sewer main that runs Sewer main was installed in 1967-1971. $ 190,000 Sewer Fund Road N Main under Old Crystal bay road from CSAH The most cost effective time to replace the Replacement 112 to CSAH 6 in conjunction with the pipe is when the road is under West Lafayette Road reconstruction construction. project. Generator Develop and entire into a preventive to ensure the reliability and longevity of $ 10,000 Sewer Fund Rehabilitation and maintenance rehabilitation contract for the the cities emergency backup generators. Preventive city's generator fleet maintenance Water Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source North Well house This project will incorporate the data feeds Well house 3 has recently received new $ 61,200 Water Fund SCADA upgrade from the newer equipment at the North chemical storage and feed equipment, and water plant into the existing SCADA Well 4. This site may also receive a new system generator and transfer switch in the future. North Water Tower Pressure wash of north water tower, inside This is part of the 10 year maintenance $ 62,500 Water Fund Maintenance and out; perform repairs to interior and plan for the tower entered into in 2014. exterior coatings and perform preventive maintenance checks and services. Well #3 Inspection This project includes the inspection and To ensure a continued, dependable supply $ 20,000 Water Fund and Maintenance rehabilitation/ replacement of Well #3's of quality water from the City's well pumps, motors, and column piping. periodic maintenance is required. This project includes the inspection and rehabilitation/ replacement of Well #3's motors, and column piping. Old Crystal Bay Replacement of the water main that runs Water main was installed in 1967 and is $ 210,000 Water Fund Road Water Main under Old Crystal bay road from CSAH cast iron pipe. Over the years the city has Replacement 112 to CSAH 6 in conjunction wit the had issues with cast iron pipe OCB Road Reconstruction project. deterioration based. The most cost effective time to replace the pipe is when the road is under construction. West Lafayette Replacement of the water main that runs Water main was installed in 1971 and is $ 75,000 Water Fund Main Replacement under the road in conjunction with the cast iron pipe. Over the years the city has West Lafayette Road reconstruction had issues with cast iron pipe project. deterioration based. The most cost effective time to replace the pipe is when the road is under construction. 10 Stormwater Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Kelly Avenue This project is a continuation of work Improve drainage to the Kelley Avenue $ 52,909 Storm Fund Drainage started in 2015 to improve drainage in the Area. Improvements Kelly Avenue area. During this phase of Phase 3 the project the City will replace the 8" tile with 12" for wetlands P7 and P8. Long Lake Ravine To repair the ravine, the proposed design Over the years erosion has led to the $100,000 Storm Fund Stabilization will include a stable cross-section, development of a ravine with in Summit (SWMP 7) installation of limestone grade control Beach Park leading into Long Lake from weirs with plunge pools, and planting of Old Long Lake Road. The existing ravine deep rooting native vegetation. is approximately 500' long that has eroded to a depth of approximately 10 feet. This erosion contributes to increased sediment and phosphorus loads and reduced dissolved oxygen in runoff, and is extremely detrimental to water quality of Long Lake. Storm Water Each year the City inspects and cleans 1/5 The inspections then drive future repair $ 2,500 Storm GF Inspection and of the storm sewer system. The focus activities for the city. Maintenance. area for 2017 is District 5. Stormwater Pond This project will delineate / verify the Per the City's MS4 permit plan. $ 10,000 Storm Fund Assessment delineations of the City's sub -watersheds as they relate to the Cities storm water ponds in the Forest Lake (FL), North Arm (NA), Painters Creek (PC), and West Arm (WA) Sub watersheds Lyric Avenue (w/ This project will be in conjunction with Address drainage and stormwater need $ 5,000 Storm Fund Road reconstruct) the Road Project. It includes repairs and while working within the right of way. improvements to the existing drainage and stormwater system associated with the roadway. Wildhurst Trail (w/ This project will be in conjunction with Address drainage and stormwater need $ 89,000 Storm Fund Road reconstruct) the Road Project. It includes repairs and while working within the right of way. improvements to the existing drainage and 11 12 stormwater system associated with the roadway. Minnetonka This project will be in conjunction with Address drainage and stormwater need $ 28,000 Storm Fund Highlands (w/Road the Road Project. It includes repairs and while working within the right of way. reconstruct) improvements to the existing drainage and stormwater system associated with the roadway. Old Crystal Bay (6- This project will be in conjunction with Address drainage and stormwater need $ 225,000 Storm Fund 112) (W/Rd the Road Project. It includes repairs and while working within the right of way. Reconstruction) improvements to the existing drainage and stormwater system associated with the roadway. Vine place (w/ Road This project will be in conjunction with Address drainage and stormwater need $ 1,000 Storm Fund reconstruct) the Road Project. It includes repairs and while working within the right of way. improvements to the existing drainage and stormwater system associated with the roadway. Misc. Storm Water This project includes various un- Small but critical storm water issues. $ 157,080 Storm Fund Improvements programmed storm water repairs and improvements include Culvert replacements, Curb and Gutter Improvements and drainage way improvements. 12 Streets Project Detail / Scope Justification Estimated Funding Cost Source Sign Inspections This activity includes the inspection all of Annual preventive maintenance $ 17,400 Streets and Maintenance the street signs in maintenance area 5 Operating ROW Tree Tree trimming within the Rights of Way Maintain safety of ROW $ 12,000 Streets Trimming for District 5. Operating Forest Arm Lane Reconstruction of 1700 ft of roadway. The pavement is in very poor condition $ 240,280 PMF Reconstruction Reclaim 6" of existing material, shaping (PCI 44) the reclaimed material and paving with the 3.5" of pavement in the city typical section as well as drainage improvements. Wildhurst Trail Reconstruction of 2240 ft of roadway. The The pavement is in very poor condition $ 309,500 PMF Reconstruction new pavement section will consist of (PCI 55) geotextile fabric laid over the subgrade, 8" of aggregate base, and 3.5" of bituminous. Drainage improvements, subgrade work, and restoration will be limited to the extent possible. Vine Place Mill and Mill and overlay 600 feet of pavement. The pavement is in poor condition (PCI $ 34,000 PMF Overlay Work includes milling 1.5" of the existing 64) surface and replacing it with 1.5" of new bituminous to prolong the overall life of the road. West Lafayette Reconstruction of 1050 ft of roadway. The pavement is in very poor condition $ 187,500 PMF Reconstruction The new pavement section will consist of (PCI 54) geotextile fabric laid over the subgrade, 8" of aggregate base, and 3.5" of bituminous. Old Crystal Bay Reconstruction of 3200 feet of roadway; Improve the safety and function of the $1,600,000 MSA Road (CAH 112- reconfiguration of access points; roadway. CSAH 6) development of turn lanes; pedestrian Reconstruction crossing improvements and possible signals 13 Leaf Street Rehabilitation (Reclamation) of 2700 feet The pavement is in poor condition (PCI $ 210,000 MSA of roadway. Work will include 69) reclamation/ removal of existing pavement, subgrade corrections, replacement and stormwater improvements. Minnetonka Mill and overlay 1100 feet of pavement. The pavement is in poor condition (PCI $ 62,000 PMF Highlands Mill and Work includes milling 1.5" of the existing 62) Overlay surface and replacing it with 1.5" of new bituminous to prolong the overall life of the road. 2018 Seal Coating Preventive maintenance. Chip seal 13,050 A seal coat provides a waterproof $ 108,122 PMF (Chip Seal) Project feet of road. Chip Sealing includes the membrane that not only slows down the Deferred due to application of asphalt emulsion followed oxidation process from the sun but also insufficient funding immediately with an aggregate cover. Seal helps the pavement shed water, coats waterproof the surface, provide low- preventing it from entering the base severity crack sealing, and restore surface material. When asphalt is exposed to sun, friction. wind, and water, the asphalt hardens/oxidizes becoming brittle leading to cracking. 2018 Crack Sealing Preventive maintenance. Select Streets Crack sealing is a routine preventive road $ 40,000 PMF shall have their cracks and routed, cleaned maintenance. Sealing cracks in asphalt - and sealed. Spot sealing will be required surfaced roads helps prevent moisture on areas with a concentration of small from infiltrating the pavement structure. cracks. This moisture weakens the structural subsurface layers and is a primary cause of pavement deterioration. Linden Lane Realignment of the last 500 feet of Linden The last 500 ft of Linden Lane begins to $ 10,000 PMF Realignment lane so that it is fully within the right of stray out of the right of way to the west. way. Lyric Avenue Mill and overlay 615 feet of pavement The pavement is in poor condition (PCI $ 40,000 PMF (Livingston to 60) Blaine) Overlay 14 11 Ilk ��-�-- Maintenance Districts hll� SII 201S= District 5 ■ Sanitary Sewer Flushing and TeI.evYsitxg F Storm Nater Inspections ■ Street Sign Inspections and Maintenance i 15 2018 Public Works Plan OCE Reconstmawn (MSA) wUrffidEsrehabs !I Brush Site Fencing ��- Brush Site Le2fREconsuucti(m (MEA) EBm& up Gem EF Mimetcaka Egblmd M&O FGTE2t A= Lane REcDmgtmct ir'Utilities Rehabs 0 0 ILinden Lane ReUgnment Rarklmpyoivemul Saga Hills-CampletiGn Wm ildht Trail RfcDnstructKm EadaT Gmerstor LS 15 viaePlace M&O N2% aire Playgrioutid. Sport CD=Regurface Lync M&O IDT3iEMgR KeUeyA,L1=e West Lafayet RerGnstnEamn we UtRifies Rehabs 8 # H rL irrr 3. IFT13FOCA I 15ML ZA j Dj TONKA EIAT North Watff Tower %Iaiutmmre Public IV DAM Fencing and Cate Long Lake Rax -mL Stabil mum S A Upgrade Narth Well House WeLl Inspectian and Rehabilitation We LI t:1 Dredge Pard GoIfCaum GC Clubhouse Patio GC Clubhouse fomdatian GC Can paikmg CTC F=a, - vDisinagE CGFe9tTEmtArea L3.ft Statim Rehab GS 2 Lift Station Rehab LE 9 Big Iqland Ptannin 16 C�BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. December 4, 2017 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: 2018 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Dear Adam: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com As requested, we have prepared a fee estimate for engineering services related to the 2018 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. Based on our understanding of the project, the scope of the project will include sewer lining, manhole sealing and repairs, and top hats on private service lines within the project area. Our scope of services for this project will include the following: • Preparation of Plans and Specifications based on aerial photos and City record plan information • Notification to affected property owners prior to bidding • Bidding assistance and award recommendations Based on the above-mentioned scope of work, we propose and hourly, not -to -exceed fee of $16,400. Upon request, a fee estimate for construction related services will be provided prior to awarding the project. Please contact me if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Principal Engineer H:\0RN0\C13112897\1_Corres\Fee Estimate - 2018 Sewer Improvements.docx Botton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. December 6, 2017 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55232 RE: 2018 Stormwater Pond Assessment Dear Adam: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com As requested, we have prepared a scope of services and fee estimate for completing the 2018 Stormwater Pond Assessment for the City. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work: Stormwater Pond Assessment — Forest Lake (FL), North Arm (NA), Painters Creek (PC), and West Arm (WA) Subwatersheds • Coordinate and meet with City as necessary to review and discuss Pond Assessment procedures and results. • Establish location of all stormwater ponds within subwatersheds on City Parcel Maps through review of City Maps, Record Drawings, and visual inspection. • Establish pond ownership and maintenance responsibility for all stormwater ponds within the listed subwatersheds. • Establish location of City maintained stormwater ponds within subwatersheds with GIS coordinates. • Delineate watersheds for City maintained stormwater ponds. • Define watershed characteristics for City maintained stormwater ponds. Characteristics shall include impervious surface percentage, time of concentrations, areas, and soil types. • Define pond characteristics for City maintained stormwater ponds. Characteristics shall include design permanent volume, estimated existing permanent volume, outlet design, normal water level, and high water level and record to Cartegraph and/or GIS database. • Define drainage flow direction for all stormwater ponds within the listed subwatersheds. • Prepare initial rating of City maintained stormwater ponds within subwatersheds as defined in City's Pond Assessment Program. • Prepare recommendations for pond bathymetric surveys to establish accurate existing permanent volumes based on initial ratings and discussions with City. • Provide layer on City's GIS mapping for data generated from pond assessments. • Perform pond bathymetric surveys per previous recommendations, as allowed by available funding. H:\ORNO\2018 New Projects\Fee Estimate - 2018 Pond Assessments.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportu City of Orono December 6, 2017 Assumptions • No Maps or Plans will be generated as part of this proposal. • No surveys will be performed as part of this proposal. • Wetland delineation services will not be required. Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a not -to -exceed fee of $10,000 to be billed on an hourly basis. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer H:\ORNO\2018 New Projects\Fee Estimate - 2018 Pond Assessments.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportu AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 11 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Ron Steffanhagen Retirement Resolution Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Public Works Director/City Engineer Agenda Public Works Director/ Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to recognize Ron Steffanhagen for his dedicated service to the city of Orono on the occasion of his retirement. 2. Background. As of December 31St, 2017 Ron Steffanhagen will retire from City service after 43 years at the Orono Golf course. Ron started work at the Golf course in 1974 and since then has been responsible for all aspects of the golf course including maintaining the grounds, landscaping, and open spaces. For the last 20 years Ron has served as the Golf Course Superintendent displaying outstanding leadership skills in the direction and management of all seasonal maintenance, seasonal service employees and volunteers creating a safe, productive and customer focused environment. Ron intends to remain in the area and now intends to take time to actually use and enjoy the course he spent so many years taking care of. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached resolution recognizing Ron Steffanhagen's 43 years of service to he Golf Course and granting him a lifetime membership to the same. Exhibits Exhibit A. Resolution recognizing Ron Steffanhagen's 43years of Service to the City Of Orono. Prepared By: Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -19a A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO EMPLOYEE RON STEFFENHAGEN FOR HIS FORTY THREE YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Ron Steffenhagen was appointed to the Golf Course Superintendent position March 18, 1974; and WHEREAS, Ron Steffenhagen is retiring after 43 years of expertly overseeing all aspects of the golf course including maintaining the grounds, landscaping, and open spaces; and WHEREAS, Ron Steffenhagen has for 20 years of the 43 years also diligently and effectively managed the golf course clubhouse displaying outstanding leadership skills in the direction and management of all seasonal maintenance, seasonal service employees and volunteers creating a safe, productive and customer focused environment; and WHEREAS, Ron Steffenhagen has displayed ingenuity and vision in various improvements to the golf course including automated irrigations, drainage improvements, and clubhouse renovations resulting in an improved experience for the citizens of Orono; and WHEREAS, Ron Steffenhagen's 43 years of service have been characterized by his dedication to providing the highest quality service to the city and its citizens; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council, staff and residents wish to extend their utmost appreciation and gratitude to Ron Steffenhagen for his leadership and service to the community as the Golf Course Superintendent. FURTHER LET IT BE RESOLVED that in light of his life time of dedication to the golf course that the City hereby bestows upon him a lifetime membership at the Orono Golf Course. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 1 11h day of December 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Denis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 12 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: #17-3980, Shawn Wischmeier, 540 Big Island — Variance After -The -Fact — Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. This application is regarding an after -the -fact variance to permit a detached shed constructed less than 10 feet from the principal structure. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on September 20, 2017; it was considered as complete on November 1St. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on December 31 st, 2017. 3. Background. A permit for the new home under construction on the property was issued in May, 2017. However, due to the remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching, the applicant began construction on the 300 square foot shed prior to the issuance of a building permit this fall. The location of the shed is 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10 -foot setback is required. Construction on the shed has been stopped. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On November 20th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 5 to 0 on a motion to approve the after -the -fact variance subject to issuance of a building permit conditioned on compliance with Building and Fire Codes. The Commission noted that the 10 foot setback requirement is mainly to address concerns with massing, and massing is not a concern due to the island location of the lot, and the setback from the lake. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits References Exhibit A. Draft Resolution PC Exhibits 11/20/17. Exhibit B. Plans + Survey Exhibit A. Application Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit D. PC Staff Report Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Prepared By: VY1GG Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -bV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-570 & 78-1438 FILE NO. 17-3980 WHEREAS, Shawn Wischmeier and Kelly Wischmeier, a married couple (hereinafter the "Applicants"), are the owners of the property located at 540 Big Island and legally described as: Lots 1 to 10 inclusive including the adjoining vacated Elm Street and Maple Place, also including the adjoining half of vacated Linden Street, all in Kate B. Plummer's Subdivision of Lot 2, Kitchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 & 6, Section 22, Township 117 N, Range 23 W., Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on September 20, 2017, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-570(5) and 78-1438 to allow construction of a detached accessory building (hereinafter the "Garage") 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10 -foot separation is required; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3980. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 3.2 acres in area and has a defined lot width in excess of 300 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Building to Building Separation Variances 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The construction of the Garage on the residential property is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances permitting the construction of the Garage with less than a 10 foot separation from the home in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Locating the Garage further and downslope from the home will result in more tree removal and greater visibility of the Garage from the lake which is inconsistent with the City's goals for a natural looking lakeshore and the appearance of open space. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the Garage within the 10 foot separation between buildings appears to be reasonable as the size of the Garage footprint is 300 square feet and the resulting effect of the mass relating to the size of the CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Property is minimal. The adjacent properties will not be adversely impacted, and the location of the Garage is marginally visible from the lake. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The location of the Garage was chosen due to the ability to limit visible impact from the lake, and while it could have been constructed in a conforming location; excessive development evident when viewed from the lake is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " It is unlikely the location of the Garage in the existing location will alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as a 300 square foot detached accessory building is an allowed use in the RS District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The home is situated on the top of the hill on the Property. The grade drops in all directions away from the home. The Garage would likely be more visible from the lake if it were to be constructed to conform based on the topography. This criterion is met. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The specific topographic site conditions on the Property no not apply to other adjacent properties. This criterion is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The owners have ample area to construct a conforming accessory building, meeting the 10 foot separation, demonstrating reasonable use. This criterion is not met. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." The Garage, although could be constructed in a conforming location the proposed variances are proposed to avoid increased visibility of the building from the lake which protects against the appearance of uncharacteristic bulk and mass. This criterion is met. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The requested variance allows preservation of the natural treed view of the Property from the lake and would not be for the sole convenience of the Applicants. This criterion is met. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants after - the -fact variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-570(5) and 78-1438 to allow construction of a Garage 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10 -foot separation is required; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. Council approval is based on the survey dated 11/01/17 by Gronberg and Associates and the building plan sketches submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 3. Approval of the variances is conditioned upon submittal of a complete after -the -fact building permit application including plans and specifications to demonstrate compliance with the applicable Building Construction and Fire Codes, as well as a double after -the - fact permit fee within 90 days from variance approval (March 11, 2018). 4. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (December 11, 2018). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of December, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor z � r g A 0 w m �xs�oit cn}� 'a� v$.515g 06 R 9 1 Us IV O '• z m y Z a m a€ o s no rn xis n n maQ� rnV+ P m @S 21-a rho ' p tly P 2 "I c > Z y N W 'o, O Rq- Z H Fy O > cn � 3� Z W Z1 S G 3 P, 1; '. T SIU C s O off{ y ��2A 3 O m Ecom w mem m o C O ti Z ' naanlv� .es ra zi 5� it 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 �`I If r 9: aM" �y 52 S� '1 rT •'I b RENMOf% I�timlf�,IW XW .u�q. M..a+epm y5y p.�yyr gyy 6Sfi s�'g n-am. GRQNBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.. _ CiNL ENGINC FRS, LANA SURYE 1+9R5. LAND PLANNERS 455 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 PHONE: 952473.4161 FAX:952473-4435 � �/ooe r%r`ST / ('�8 �` ISL /i � �l N C FOUNDATION AS -BUILT SURVEY FOR IN LOTS 1-10 AND VACATED ROADS, KATE B. PLUMMERS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 2, KITCHEL'S SUBDIVISION OF GOV'T LOTS 5 & 6, SEC. 22, T. 117 N., R 23 W. HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA I I I 11 1 - 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lots 1 to 10 inclusive including the adjoining vacated Elm Street and Maple Place, also including the adjoining half of vacated Linden Street, all in Kate B. Plummer's Subdivision of Lot 2, Kitchel's Subdivision of Government Lots 5 & 6, Section 22, Township 117 N., Range 23 W. This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing building and shed foundation thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. • : Iron marker found o : Iron marker set - —� — : Existing contour line, mean sea level datum (960.0) : Existing spot elevation Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum 0 30 60 M SCALE IN FEET 17-209 N 8646-18" E 161.12 \ \ \\ \ \\ \ �\ \ 0 \\\ // \ I I \\ TOP OF \ \ \\ \\ TOP OF \ \ \ \\ \\ / I % BL = 956.5 — — — — \ \ \00 d- / /I I I \ TOP OF LAB = (954.3) TOP- F 00 \ — / / ` \ \ TO' OF SLP — — — — BLOCK = (959.9)\ 1 � \ \\ \\ I F UND%�10 // oo OPOF_ \ \ \ \ 1 I (960.0) — — B OCk = 959. I I I \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \1 I /ALL 4 CORNERS / �o / — \ \ \ RE THE SAME Foy PoRo" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ �PwVN N \ 026'I Go i% LU oz0 LL� 4 I I cop N W o _ °(D N C Z W Z LO l' d' Cl) D. T � d' W 'r, Z n s,. N Ln Q W _J 0 U_ 0°z � "a U)WO � W� NOO4- Q o> Z Z od Z2 me 0 J C ® 3 M W WW ® J tit m0�W Z c) Z JZ La)CL�c� a)��a O i.L V � a LU oz0 LL� 4 I I cop N W o _ °(D N C r` RCX. O �Na � O U � W L' Q. ° � "a W U NOO4- C i U 4- O J O . Z Z ++ a) a) 0 >M a) !t-- _0 (u��s� Do- C,- co La)CL�c� a)��a — 3 (Ur- LUD 0 a r CL a 0 0 0 0 LLJ 2lu�� " �> MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 3. #17-3980 SHAWN WISCHMEIER, 540 BIG ISLAND, AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE, 7:05 P.M. — 7:25 P.M. Shawn Wischmeier, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the permit for the new home under construction was issued in May of 2017. Due to the remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching, the applicant made site preparations, brought materials to the property, and began construction of a 300 square foot shed prior to the issuance of a building permit this fall. The shed is located 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10 -foot setback is required. Construction on the shed has been stopped and the applicant has requested a setback variance. A detailed analysis of the practical difficulties was provided in the Staff report. However, while the applicant has provided a compelling argument supporting the placement of the shed, Staff finds few practical difficulties exist which support the requested variance beyond that of convenience. To date no public comments have been received. Planning Staff recommends denial of the variance. As the shed is only partially constructed, the applicant should be required to apply for a building permit for the shed and move it to a conforming location. Thiesse asked if there was a foundation previously there. Curtis indicated the foundation on the survey depicts the existing foundation. Thiesse asked if the shed is on frost footings. Curtis indicated it is. Shawn Wischmeier, Applicant, stated the floor of the shed or garage structure was part of the cabin building permit, which is why it is there. Wischmeier stated the reasons he is here is because he is asking MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. for a variance for the base of the garage and that the concrete and the floor was approved as part of the building permit. Curtis noted it was approved as a patio. Wischmeier stated the patio as constructed is 3.3 feet too close to the cabin. Thiesse stated the patio could have been up next to the house but it is the building that cannot be that close. Wischmeier stated the patio was being built for the express purpose of putting a garage on it but the garage was not part of the building permit. Wischmeier stated he thought this was all part of the original package and that he makes no excuses for it. The intent was that it was supposed to be conforming in order to erect the garage onto the base and that his contractor clearly understood that was to be done. Wischmeier pointed out the 6.7 foot setback. Wischmeier explained the drop in elevation is approximately 12 feet, and that when they bought the lot, they thought it had a nice elevated area. Unfortunately that area has very poor soils and a bunch of fill was brought in to raise it up. Wischmeier stated the practical difficulties relate to the foundation and the extreme drop-off. Wischmeier indicated they are attempting to make the structure compact to hide it the best they can from the lake and to get it where there is good soil to pour the foundation. Wischmeier stated the practical difficulty is the grade, and that getting to buildable soil for the garage foundation was challenging, which is why the contractor moved towards the cabin. The challenge with extending it four feet means that they will have to dig down a good way to get to flat soil, which results in the whole foundation having to be shifted down three to four feet. Wischmeier stated the problem with the backside of the garage is the way it is cut into the hill. Wischmeier noted the structure is not viewable from the lake or from the neighbors' properties and that the issue with all of this was getting it to fit proportionally with the house. Wischmeier indicated they tried to get it visually correct with the house but that there is no practical way to build a structure like this that is correct and looks right from the front. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Wischmeier stated his contractor admitted the mistake but that he could not be here tonight. Wischmeier stated at first he tried to work with the builder to try to get it moved over, but as they analyzed it, they realized there is not a logical way to make it fit. Wischmeier stated bulking or massing should not be an issue because of the 3.2 acres and none of the neighbors can see the project. Wischmeier displayed pictures of the property from the lake and the partially completed structure. Wischmeier noted when there are no leaves on the trees, you can see the front of the garage from the lake, but that keeping the structure compact helps avoid challenges with massing. Olson asked if the two structures could be joined with a walkway. Curtis indicated he would need to make it a weather -tight connection. Wischmeier indicated he would be open to whatever suggestions. Wischmeier stated the garage was meant to have a little bit of storage on the top and room for an ATV on the bottom. Wischmeier stated he would prefer not to connect it since it might look worse in that case but that he will not completely rule it out. Wischmeier noted there is only about three or five feet from that corner, and in order to adjoin it, they would need to build some type of structure. Wischmeier stated if the hill was not so steep, they could have pushed it down, but they thought they could put fire rock and insulation and whatever else is needed to make it work. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Schoenzeit stated this is a safety issue in regards to the closeness of the structures, and just like when someone puts their monument or gate and there is not enough stopping room, they have to move the gate. Schoenzeit commented this is not really a variance eligible mistake. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis noted the building code allows buildings to be this close and that the City's zoning code requires ten feet, which is an open space requirement. Curtis indicated the building can be three feet away if the proper materials are used. Thiesse stated it is a massing issue and not a fire safety variance and that the applicant is well under hardcover and structural coverage limits. Thiesse pointed out it is located on a 3.2 acre property. Lemke stated the massing does not bother him as much as the fact that it is an after -the -fact variance, and that in his view if it had been connected, the Planning Commission would have allowed it from a massing standpoint. As a result, Lemke indicated he is okay with it. Schoenzeit commented it is a very big foundation for a patio. Thiesse stated he has difficulty requiring an additional building to make it compliant. Lemke commented that would not really solve anything either. Schoenzeit stated the applicant should be required to comply with the fire code, and if the applicant does not want to connect it, that is his prerogative. Landgraver stated the massing issue is important in Orono and that he views a component of massing being open areas between structures. Landgraver stated it does stretch the imagination that that used to be a patio and that was what it is proposed as but that it is now a 25 -foot tall structure. Landgraver stated in his view there was an egregious error done in disclosure of the plans that could have been avoided by discussing the project thoroughly with Staff. Lemke asked if the foundation is sufficient to support the structure. Curtis stated she believes so. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 20, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3980, Shawn Wischmeier, 540 Big Island, granting of an after -the -fact variance to permit construction of a detached accessory building less than ten feet from the principal structure subject to meeting building code and fire code requirements. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 09/20/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 11/01/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 12/31/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 20 November 2017 Subject: #17-3980, Shawn Wischmeier, 540 Big Island, ATF Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variance approval to permit construction of a detached accessory building less than 10 feet from the principal structure. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background A permit for the new home on the property was issued in May of 2017. Due to the remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching, the applicant made site preparations, brought materials to the property, and began construction of a 300 square foot shed prior to the issuance of a building permit this fall. The shed is located 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10 -foot setback is required. Construction on the shed has been stopped and the application has requested a setback variance. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-570 & 78-1279- Setbacks: RS District Required Proposed Rear 50' +200' East Side 50' ±75' West Side 50' +300' Lakeshore 75' ±125' Average Lakeshore The shed will be conforming with respect to the average lakeshore setback. Structure to Structure 10' 6.7' Section 78-1403- Structural Coverage: The property has 3.2 acres in area and exceeds 1.99 acres; it is not subject to structural coverage limitations. FILE # 17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: The property, including the 300 square foot shed, is well below the Tier 1, 25% hardcover allowance. Applicable Regulations: Building to Building Setback Variance (Section 78-570 & 78-1438) As constructed, the shed and the home under construction are separated by 6.7 feet where a 10 foot separation is required. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The construction of the shed on a residential property is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance to permit the allowance of a detached building with less than a 10 foot separation from the home in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The mass and building crowding is inconsistent with the City's goals for preservation of open space. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the shed within the 10 foot separation between buildings appears to be reasonable as the size of the shed is only 300 square feet and the overall massing on the property is minimal. The adjacent properties will not be adversely impacted and the location of the shed is less visible from the lake. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The shed was constructed without a building permit, and could have been constructed in a conforming location; crowding the buildings on the property is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is not met; and FILE # 17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 3 of 4 c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. It is unlikely the location of the shed in the existing location will alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a 300 square foot detached accessory storage building is an allowed use in the RS District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The home is situated on the top of the hill on the Property. The grade drops in all directions away from the home. The shed would likely be more visible from the lake if it were to be constructed to conform based on the topography. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The conditions relevant to the Property are similar and apply to other adjacent properties. This criterion is not met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The owners have ample area to construct a conforming shed meeting the 10 foot separation demonstrating reasonable use. This criterion is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The shed, while not out of character with the neighborhood, could be constructed in a conforming location the proposed variance is proposed to avoid a tenant of the Code intended to protect against the appearance of uncharacteristic bulk and mass. This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The purpose for granting the requested variance would be for the convenience to the applicants. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status Staff has completed a preliminary review of the project for compatibility with the septic system, and has determined that the project is not likely to impact the existing or future septic sites. FILE # 17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 4 of 4 Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis While the applicant has provided a compelling argument supporting the placement of the shed (visibility, impact to the site/trees, etc), Staff finds few practical difficulties exist which support the requested variance beyond convenience. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends denial of the variance. As the shed is partially constructed the applicant should be required to apply for a building permit for the shed and move the shed to a conforming location. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 13 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: #17-3988, #17-3989, and #17-3990 — Lake West Development, LLC, o/b/o Rick & Barbara Lupient, (PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001/0002/0003) "Ivy Place" — Variances, Easement Vacation, Conditional Use Permit — Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose for the action item is to consider multiple requests that were contingencies for the preliminary plat. The following are the requested action items: a. 17-3988: The applicant is requesting wetland setback and driveway width to exceed 8 feet within the lakeyard variances. b. 17-3989: Vacation of 2 utility easements for sanitary that needs to be relocated to correspond to the actual location of the utility c. 17-3990: Conditional Use Permit to allow over 500 cubic yards of fill in the floodplain, excavation in the floodplain, over 50 cy of fill in the lake yard, and wetland alterations for filling a small wetland location in the center of the proposed site and beach improvements. Since there are three different requests, three separate motions are necessary. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on October 18, 2017; it was considered as complete on November 8th, 2017. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on January 7th, 2017. Background. In September, the City Council reviewed and approved (17-3962) the Preliminary Plat for Ivy Place, a 2 lot residential subdivision at the northern end of Ivy Place, a public street. Ivy Place replatting the previously established the three lots into two buildable parcels and one outlot, as a front lot/ back lot configuration. The application suggest the construction of two homes meeting the setback requirements. To facilitate construction, substantial grading must occur, a small wetland must be filled in the center of proposed lot 2, and most of the existing trees on site will be removed. The driveway serving the properties would impact the Watershed's buffer and the city's setbacks. In all, several variances (17-3988), conditional use permits(17- 3990), easement vacation(17-3989) , and wetland impacts, all requiring a public hearing, where identified, and the approval of the preliminary plat was conditioned on approval of these requests. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On November 20, 2017 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 5-0 on a motion to approve each request with the following conditions: a. 17-3988: Approval of the wetland setback approval of a variance for a driveway exceeding the 8' maximum width for driveways in the shoreland setback zone variance contingent on the following I. Final Plat Approval 2.MCWD Approval of the wetland buffer impact. The driveway will be within 2 feet of the wetland. b. 17-3989: approval of the proposed driveway and underground utility easement vacation contingent the following I. Final Plat Approval 2. Replacement with new utility easement on final plat 3. Engineering comments are met. In subsequent discussion with the city attorney, it appears the driveway easement is a private Prepared By: IC) Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb9a AGENDA ITEM easement, and the city does not have jurisdiction to vacate. The existing utility easement to be vacated, will in actuality be relocated to better protect the existing utility in place. c. 17-3990: Approval for the proposed Conditional Use Permits for filling 1000+CY of fill in the floodplain, moving over 50 CY of earth within the 75 foot lakeyard, and 500 CY within the site, wetland alterations for filling in a small wetland and beach improvements contingent on the following: 1. Final plat approval 2. Approval for all permits related to the MCWD 3. Applicant shall receive approval from the DNR Commission prior to received land alteration permit 4. WCA Approval 5.No parking on Ivy Place at any time 6. Beach Improvements stall be limited to the project scope. 7.A review of the road condition must be done before and after construction, any damage will be repaired by developer. 8. Hauling hours are limited to 7:30-3:OOpm and 4:OOpm-8:OOpm while school is in session. 9. Confirm the location of the delineated wetland (See Exhibit Q 5. Public Comment. Comments from the public were received regarding this application; refer to the draft Planning Commission minutes for more detail. The neighboring resident was concerned that the driveway would encroach into the wetland, and wanted clarification. This clarification is provided as Exhibit C, showing the wetland boundary, driveway limits, and the easement.... 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff notes that the creation of a beach may require additional wetland mitigation. Staff recognizes that the use of the property requires the requested applications, and they are the minimum necessary to use the property for its intended use. Staff supports the conditions intended to mitigate negative impacts associated with the project. Staff recommends approval following the Planning Commission's recommendations. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Driveway/ Wetland Exhibit Exhibit D. Legal Descriptions of Easements Exhibit E. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit F. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Project Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Plans Exhibit D. Site Plans for Grading and Floodplain Alternations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Prepared By: IC) Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb9a AGENDA ITEM Exhibit F. Plat Response Comments for Engineer Exhibit G. Easement Exhibit Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map Prepared By: ��C) Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb9a CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND EASEMENT VACATION FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1605, 78-1282, 78-1126, 17-1286, 17-967, AND 78-1610 FILE NO. 17-3988 17-3989 17-3990 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2017, Lake West Development LLC o/b/o Rick and Barbara Lupient ("Applicants"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property identified by PIDS: 2011723420003, 2011723420002 and 2011723420001 "Ivy Place" and legally described as: Lots 1,2,3 Block 1 Casco Point Addition (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on November 8, 2017 the application was deemed complete; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1605 and 78-1282 to allow a setback from the wetland and to allow the driveway in shoreland overlay district to exceed 8 feet in width; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made an application to the City of Orono for condition use permits to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1126, 78-1286, 78-967, 78-1610 in order to allow for bringing fill into the floodplain, moving over 50 cubic yards in the lake yard setback, altering over 500 cubic yards in the shoreland overlay district and altering portions of wetlands; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made an application to the City of Orono for vacation the following easements: sanitary sewer document # (Document 855727) utilty easement, document # (Document 862192) WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances, conditional use permits and easement vacations; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances, conditional use permits and easement vacations as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3988, #17-3989, #17-3990. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1C Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 2.16 acres in area and had a defined width of over 200 feet. 4. In September, 2017, the City Council granted preliminary plat approval for Ivy Place, Zoning File #17-3962. 5. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 6. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Wetland setback b. Driveway to exceed 8 feet in width 7. Applicant has applied for the following condition use permits: a. Filling in the floodplain b. Moving over 50 cubic yard within the 75 foot lakeyard setback c. Land alteration for grading activities exceeding 500 cubic yards in the shoreland overlay district 8. Wetland alterations a. Filling in a small 168 sq ft wetland in proposed lot 2, and b. in two areas to create a beach area. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 9. Vacation of the following easements: a. Sanitary Sewer Easement (Document 855727) b. Sanitary Sewer Easement (Document 862192) VARIANCE ANALYSIS: In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The intent of the wetland setback is to preserve the wetland. The applicant proposes minimal improvements in the only location feasible. The applicant plans to utilize BMP to minimize and protect the wetland. The intent of the driveway width maximum is to minimize hardcover in the shore setback. Allowing for a 12' wide shared driveway to gain access to two parcels is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinances, which is to manage hard cover in the 0-75'. 3. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The Comprehensive Plan balances the right to use property and the need to protect natural resources. The reduced setback in the minimum necessary to afford safe access to the property without impacting adjacent private properties. Allowing access and proper drainage for two newly created lots in consistent with the comprehensive plan. 4. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The applicant's request to construct a 12' wide driveway and create proper drainage to serve the two newly created lots is reasonable. There is no other location available that would avoid impacts to the wetlands and outside the lake yard without impacting the adjacent residential lot. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The applicant did not develop the point, or place wetlands CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. on the property. The unique circumstances were not created by the applicant in either variance situation. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.'The encroachment is non-structural and connects to the existing access for neighboring parcels. 5. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been the only factor in the variance approval determination. 6. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 7. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a driveway for access a principle structure is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. Variances requested are from performance standards of the code, not uses. 8. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 9. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The applicant's property is unique because it is surrounded by Lake Minnetonka with no access via vehicle that would meet the requirements of the ordinance without impacting the adjacent residential lot. 10. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The orientation of the applicant's property between the lake and the wetland and having no direct access to a public road is relatively unique. The configuration of the property as a point into Lake Minnetonka additionally differentiates the parcel. 11. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." There is no opportunity to place a driveway into the site without impacting the wetland setback, or improvements in the lake yard. Allowing the applicant to alter the land within the shoreland setback is CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. necessary for the development of the two proposed lots. Without access, the applicant lose substantial property rights. 12. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Staff believes this criteria to be met because the proposed 12 foot wide shared driveway ties into the existing access for the site and the grading within the shoreland setback will address water concerns that currently exist on the site. 13. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The variance is necessary in order to allow access and development of the two proposed platted lots. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS 1. Consistent with the community management plan; The use of the property is residential, the temporary grading operations are necessary to create building sites on the property. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the property. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement does not apply to the requested conditional use. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood. The applicant believes the proposing grading plan will allow for more floodplain and will create suitable lots for two new homes on the proposed lots. The grades, once established, should have no adverse impacts on the neighborhood. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed grades will help to facilitate stormwater runoff down property lines, and not toward adjacent properties. The proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; This condition is satisfied. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed grading for creating a building pad, adequate drainage for the lots and stormwater management will not change the intended residential use of the property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The action of importing and exporting of fill can have temporary adverse impacts on the neighborhood. Often substantial grading in residential zones creates temporary noise, dust, and vibration. 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses The applicant has provided a landscape plan which will serve to reestablish vegetation. 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; See #9 above. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed project will be creating more floodplain area to better manage stormwater for the site. The project will also create a drainage pattern and should help improve water quality off site. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The Applicant will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Additionally Section 78-1286(e) provides guidance for the granting of a conditional use permit in the Shoreland Zone. Specifically, 78-1286(e) states the following: 1. Grading or filling in any type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: The grading impacting the small interior wetland appears to be supported by WCA, whose review is ongoing. The wetland maybe impacted by the creation of the two beaches. 2. Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. 3. Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re - vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. 4. Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re -vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re -vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. 6. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. The stability of the finished grade will be component of the approval of the permits. 7. Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the city engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater. The project does not contemplate the creation of or work on steep slopes. Not applicable. 8. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. Not applicable. 9. Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner of the department of natural resources under Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. The applicant will receive all approval before any work begins. 10. Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. The proposed alterations are proposed to take place within the property boundaries and are necessary to allow the proposed platted lots to have a building envelope for single family homes. 11. Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. A riprap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of section 78-969. Not applicable. EASEMENT VACATION ANALYSIS 12. Then easements do not correctly follow the route of the existing infrastructure. It is in the best interest of the city and the property owner to vacate and replace the easement with one more correctly describing the utility. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 13. The City Council finds that the existing Easement area to be vacated has no apparent present or future benefit to the public. 14. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve, or use the existing Easement area for open space purposes. 15. The unimproved Easement area as it exists serves no public purpose. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants the variances, conditional use permits and easement vacations to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1605, 78-1282, 78-1126, 17-1286, 17-967, AND 78-1610 to allow wetland setback, driveway to exceed 8 feet in width, grading in the floodplain, land alteration in the lakeyard, land alterations in the shoreland overlay district, and wetland alterations subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the submittal plans dated October 18, 2017 and the easement legal descriptions submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining the final plat approval for Ivy Place, or the variances, conditional use permits and easement vacations will expire once year from approval (December 11, 2018). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. 6. Approval for the request variance shall be contingent upon the following: a. Final Plat Approval b. MCWD Approval of the wetland buffer reduction 7. Approval for the easement vacations stall be contingent on the following: a. Final Plat Approval CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b. Replacement with new utility easement on final plat 8. Approval of the Conditional Use Permits shall have the following conditions: a. Final plat approval b. Approval for all permits related to the MCWD c. Applicant shall receive approval from the DNR Commission prior to received land alteration permit d. WCA Approval e. No parking on Ivy Place at any time f. Beach Improvements stall be limited to the project scope. g. A review of the road condition must be done before and after construction, any damage will be repaired by developer. h. Hauling hours are limited to 7:30-3:00pm and 4:00pm-8:00pm while school is in session i. Application shall confirm the location of the delineated wetland before install of the driveway ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of December, 2017 ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 10 DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: RENDER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3440 FEDERAL DRIVE, SUITE 110 EAGAN, MN 55122 651-452-5051 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6160 CARMEN AVE E INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55076 763-433-9175 ORONO, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR0 : CITY RESUBMITTAL EQ SITE LOCATION MAP'j MASTER LEGEND: EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 41.26 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS ------ 0— EOF=1135.52 B-1 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL DRAINAGE ARROW EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) Spring Park �r C� 0 1. a k,' -wind 5 Yacht 09 Span Condos Peficnn Poem Goose !stand EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT Sharel�ne Dr — _ - Spray !Mand Lyric Ave. p � � � � ��elS�Qps e • f � i5 Shbrellne Ur tJ `G 7 S a r 4Fd°ae Rd PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE v EXISTING STOPBOX ►t EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX SITE LOCATION EXISTING LIGHT 0 EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE SHEET INDEX iPHER STATE ONE CALL VWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Q Mancheslpr Rd C0.0 r- Comberland Rd SITE SURVEY C0.2 Dona)[1d Ha-mtu�i itd PRELIMINARY REMOVALS C2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE t PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN s PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY DETAILS P PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Tuxedo flO IS- '�Xeda Blvd PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS Aherd&en Rd e Hanover Rd PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS Island Vie SITE LOCATION MAP'j MASTER LEGEND: EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 41.26 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS ------ 0— EOF=1135.52 B-1 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL DRAINAGE ARROW EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) Spring Park �r C� 0 1. a k,' -wind 5 Yacht 09 Span Condos Peficnn Poem Goose !stand EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT Sharel�ne Dr — _ - Spray !Mand Lyric Ave. p � � � � ��elS�Qps e • f � i5 Shbrellne Ur tJ `G 7 S a r 4Fd°ae Rd PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE v EXISTING STOPBOX ►t EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX SITE LOCATION EXISTING LIGHT 0 EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE SHEET INDEX iPHER STATE ONE CALL VWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET CO.1 SITE SURVEY C0.2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1.0 PRELIMINARY REMOVALS C2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C3.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY DETAILS C6.0 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SW1.0 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS �017 Ho Ro�e (C Cm m CD M 1P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE VIS DEVELOPMENT, LLC I— U W O IY a T— rn M L0 L0 z 73 O O LuU ^Q I`.}L 0/� \Y M V Lo J M J Ln .. z z W z 0 Lu az O z J :E W Q0 Q0N LLI W CO u Vn W = LO QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 TITLE SHEET Como (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 329•'% contour �=110 Found Spike --- _----- t Tree Inventory Survey for: WEST DEVELOPMENT LEGEND 6\ 1a ��JQ^ 0 Iron Monument Found S —Sanitary Sewer i - �,, Y'i —w— Watermain 2 Pru x Spruce . r'.y " , ` 04- Hyd.-6Hydrant /4pfar p lar t,, r GV • Gate Valve a 931. ` po to MHO Manhole M . ` 926.I/ * 5 V Spruce paw r E"r ' CGo Cleanout { $ x r, Inv. Invert Elevation 9 j{ �'/ " 4} ," PP -O- Power Pale l ifa f „y,Fj + - , Concrete Surface 10 x 1a Bituminous Surface 1 I ®Boulder Wall 1±EMRAr r "/ "� —G—Buried Gas Most westerly corner of Lot 'O H 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ---- - -• l�("�' \ OF SPRING PARK LOTS `r add ` Most southerly comer of Lot�I>exs 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----........ • •... OF SPRING PARK LOTS aoc r � 6 01 r "'� � rl +• 1 4 + r , 1 !!d �✓d�1 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SITE SURVEY D 1� 30 90 cafe' in e 1 " = 40'-0" 20'-0" 0 40'-0" COO NOTES * Bearings shown are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. * Contact Gopher State 1 for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Areas: Total = 94,080± square feet (2.16± acres). Lot 1 = 33,170± square feet (0.76± acre). Lot 2 = 29,960± square feet (0.69± acre). Lot 3 = 30,450± square feet (0.71± acre). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition. Tog # DOH Species 961 7" Boxelder 1005 6" Boxelder 962 9" Boxelder 1006 6" Boxefder 919 8" Boxelder 963 10" Boxelder 1007 8"/18" Boxefder 920 6" Boxelder 964 6" Boxelder 1008 6"/8" Boxelder 921 8" Boxelder 965 7" Boxelder 1009 6" Boxelder 922 7" Boxelder 966 9" Boxelder 1010 3-9" Boxefder 923 6" Boxelder 967 2-8"Soxefder 1011 9" Boxelder 924 7" Boxelder 968 2-8"6oxefder 1012 9"/10" Boxelder 925 6" Boxelder 969 7" Elm 1013 8" Boxelder 926 9" Boxelder 970 6"/8"Boxelder 1014 8" Boxefder 927 10" Boxefder 971 6" Boxelder 1015 8" Boxefder 928 8" Boxelder 972 7" Boxefder 1016 9" Saxelder 929 7" Boxefder 973 6"/8" Boxelder 1017 6" Boxefder 930 7" Boxelder 974 6"/7" Boxelder 1018 r Boxefder 931 11" Boxelder 975 7" Boxefder 1019 12" Boxelder 932 14" Boxefder 976 6" Elm 1020 7" Boxelder 933 9 Boxelder 977 10" Boxelder 1021 6" Boxefder 934 10" Boxelder 978 8" Boxefder 1022 7" Boxefder 935 10" Boxefder 979 6"/8" Boxelder 1023 9" Boxelder 936 10" Boxelder 980 6"/8" Elm 1024 7" Boxelder 937 21" Boxefder 981 6" Boxelder 1025 22" Boxelder 938 19" Boxelder 982 6" Boxefder 1026 9" Boxelder 939 19" Boxefder 983 7" Boxefder 1027 7"/8" Boxelder 940 15" Boxelder 984 6" Boxelder 1028 7"/8" Boxelder 941 8" Boxelder 985 11"/11" Boxelder 1029 3-9" Boxelder 942 18" Boxelder 986 6" Boxefder 1030 6"/8" Boxelder 943 18" Boxelder 987 6'/7' Boxelder 1031 6" Boxelder 944 16' Soxeider 988 7"18" Boxelder 1032 8" Elm 945 12" Boxelder 989 8" Boxefder 1033 9" Elm 946 9" Boxelder 990 12" $oxelder 1034 10" Basswood 947 11" Boxefder 991 10" Boxelder 1035 11" Boxelder 948 15" Boxefder 992 8" Boxefder 1036 11" Elm 949 16" Boxefder 993 16" Boxelder 1037 10" Elm 950 11" Boxelder 994 7" Boxelder 1038 9" Boxefder 951 16" Boxelder 995 10" Boxelder 1039 6" Boxefder 952 12" Boxelder 996 10" Boxelder 1040 7" Boxefder 953 15" Boxefder 997 9" Boxelder 1041 7' Elm 954 14" Boxelder 998 8"/10" Boxelder 1042 6' Boxeider 955 21" Boxefder 999 9" Boxelder 1043 7" Mople 956 8" Boxelder 1000 8" Boxefder 1044 13" Elm 957 6" Boxelder 1001 7" Boxelder 1045 7" Boxefder 958 6" Boxelder 1002 8" Boxefder 1046 7 "Boxefder 959 7" Boxelder 1003 6" Boxefder 1047 8 "Boxelder 960 9" Boxelder 1004 6"/6" Boxelder I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 1st day of December, 2016 RENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LANG? SURVEYORS 3440 Federo! Drive • Suite 110 - Eagon, Mlnnesoto - Phone (651) 452-505'1 JOB: 164-2955.010 / Found Spike ----L- ' A Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS V � I / 01 ' 0 �C / '�O / / / G Floor P / 01 / °°O < �2 o � 011 � v o m ZONING NOTES: EXISTING ZONING: AG PROPOSED ZONING: P.U.D. / R2 SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE OC�017HO \\\ Om m O M IP, 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC I— U Lu O d co L0 0 0 0 LUU a 0 0 M V LO J Cy') J LO ., z z Y W z 2 0 a'z 0 z J 2E W >N N W w Cl) W a W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 �G 1 11 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY PLAT C0.2 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS Ire 929.4 con r 000 �� \ �aB ag h ;2k7 0 8 7 6 0i, 4446 FILL EXISTING WETLAND B, 7': \ COORDINATE WITH MINNEHAHA�-9 ` 7 ° z 3 CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT r I ' 2 w AND CITY OF ORONO, PRIOR TO 1� 7 3 ��\ \ CONSTRUCTION v'9 N ` H To, 9 "\ In v. ' g S' S con to `\ \ \� �\ Inv. 9 ' u� \ 04\ �X �. \ \ ' Jam' 8 ♦ \� 7 // / / l/ 7 02 0 \X ` 41%.6 / 1 ' \ 9319 9 O n \ ' ` ♦ REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP. 6049. v ' 5 1 8% ' 0 \� 41v* 1141. 30� r,9 \ i 7� 14b.9 \ 28 147 11 009 29♦♦`\\ C�i 6 1 ��r 2 `\ �1 0 GRADING LIMITS x'X REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP 40 ` � 'MH� Top 931.06 ' Inds 926.36 r � ` r _ \� EXISTING DOCK TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED @ ADJACENT 031 ♦�� `\, '1% PROPERTY OWNER'S DIRECTION. qo PROTECT FROM DAMAGE 13 17 j�l �♦ � ''� �� 47 1819 ♦ ♦ \\ 22 $ A,.,- e7744444.rrrr��r�"��''�� 03433 35 237� r� 24 REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS 6' �9 :SHRUBS AND UNDERGROWTH 4 44 THROUGHOUT SITE, TYP. 26 5 \ r \ \ 7 6 \ � � 4 d %'Z c EXISTING DOCK & BOATLIFT TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED @ i rOp ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S I I ' Inv. 92` DIRECTION. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE 1, ^� . .4 s Q X -------------- �MPORARY BOA 7L/F' ®------------- .00 Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 A Found Spike ri iCl�l43 --_�Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------- 41 X1p46 .7I �r \ 0/ 4 ���x/� / 0/ 0.-/ # EXISTING FENCE . TO BE REMOVED " i r0 G pru , o pruce, spruce <'' 19001i r �O r r /r i r G Floor GP / / 0 / ,!yah/ Hyd. - \ Most westerly corner of Lot \s' / \ �o . MH -----"- \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --- OF SPRING PARK LOTS ty �o Most southerly corner of Lot ,b 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ 01 OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O \�O ` �1 PROTECT TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, SUPPLY TREE FENCING BUT KEEP ON SITE UNLESS ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDES APPROVAL 76! REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. CITY OF ORONO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. EXTENT OF REMOVAL AT CONNECTION TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHOULD BE COORDINATED IN THE FIELD WITH THE CITY AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR MECHANICAL WEEDER. b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCKTHORN) - REMOVE BY HAND, ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY WITH HERBICIDE. 3. NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY. 4. ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS, DEPENDING ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. 5. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORK TO FALL AND LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT. 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BY A TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR. REMOVALS LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- F, - ===_ i X EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC I- U w O d co In L0 G O O O LUU a 0 0 CO M LO J Cy') Lo J Lo z z Y W z 2 ° 0- Uj z O z J 2E W L0 N N W Lu C W a _V W = Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY REMOVALS PLAN C1 ■ 0 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS -----929.4 co` 10 shote i \ �I \ I � `\ \ STAMPED CONCRETE \ PATIO, COORD. STYLE E COLOR w/ OWNER PRIOF `\ TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP GRADING LIMITS , STAMPED COf � \OOH \ s MOTOR COUP FIELD STONE PAVERS. COORD. COLOR, STYLE AND MATERIAL w/ LANDSCAPE ARCH., SAMPLES REQUIRED, TYP. PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION, COORDINATE \ e WI ARCH AND OWNER \ II � � ■ Il r• 's r 1' r r 1 / 1 Found Spike ----1 4444 V Most westerly corner of Lot \ / 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS O� v�9 12' WIDE SAND BEACH, TYP. 076 PROPOSED HOUSE PAD, 0 O COORD. w/ FINAL DESIGN FROM v ARCH., TYP.;ZP�CQ \� 9 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE� 12' WIDE SAND BEACH, TYP. CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. 2. THE CONDITION OF IVY PLACE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND THE EXISTING CONDITION SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED WITH PICTURES. AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK, THE STREET SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR DAMAGE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY SITE WORK. .0-6 . Pop/ r r � .0, o�GJ 114,1 (0 12' WIDE BITUMINOUS r DRIVEWAY r eO r' / F / GFloor Floor GP / / / 3,. spruce '•,�y r WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF / PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 PROPOSED LOT 2 / 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% / 18,109 SF 19.2% BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0%4,653 / 7,296 5F 12.3/❑ 0 5F 0.0% 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent / LY / 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% p r WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 PROPOSED LOT 2 0UTLOTA 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL (LOT 1 +LOT 2 +OUTLOTA) 18,109 SF 19.2% BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0%4,653 5F 16.0% 7,296 5F 12.3/❑ 0 5F 0.0% 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner LY ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% p ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 22,827 SF 78.4% 50,243 SF 84.8% 2,901 SF 50.6% a TOTAL SITE AREA 94,080 SF 100.0% 29,103 SF 100.0% 59,239 SF 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CON DITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 8,996 SF 9.6% OUTLOT A 2,837 SF 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL (LOT 1 +LOT 2 +OUTLOTA) 18,109 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 14,970 SF 15.9% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE a7 co LO 2 O O U a O O CO M LO J co ..z z Y LLI z 2 ° a UJ O z J 2E L LJ N L LI Lu C ~ L LI a (D L LI z Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 5,738 SF 100.0% SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2 ■ 01 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. /--929.4 contour ------------- i \ `% h /% -y � O O \ ♦ \ \ `♦ \ ` \ `♦ DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT \ ♦♦ PER DOCUMENT NO. T5010662 \ \ \\ `� 4/%0 i Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot J 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS 0(C�OVHO Rhe C� m O M IP, 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 5 `\% 041\ W � A V � � Q JFound 1/2" Iron Pipe \ / '°-t a / � � G / / J5 4/b rfl, / / I /00 00 EASEMENT AREAS: DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT SUMMARY TOTAL EASEMENTAREA 8500 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN 0 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN (temporary, annually) 284 [sf] SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE U LLI O co LO LO O O LUU a 0 0 M V LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z z Y W z 2 o a Uj 0 z J 2E W L6 N N W Lu Cl) W a (D W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY \ EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.1 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' /000, 4 con t` i / � � \\ \ ` �♦�.-• 'Shote J O7 6 \ I \ \ \ \ \\\``♦ �(/ 19 VACATE EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT \� / \\ `♦ I I 1 I \ I \ \ ♦` I� I ♦ ROADWAY EASEMENT TO REMAIN (C �ov H S Rohe Cm m O M 1P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC \♦ LU Q Found 1/2" Iron Pipe O:6 a / / / 00071, ol /"C < p / 3" �I � % � �� spruce P or / 1 ; I / // Poplar � / I �0 I /I � / X/ G Floor / � o ` Most westerly corner of Lot \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ -- ..... ............ - OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ -Po \ F Most southerly corner of Lot ,b 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - 01 OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O lad \ 20 \�O ` �1 SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE U W 0 d rn co In L0 O 0 0 LUU a 0 0 co M V LO J � J LO ., z z Y W z 2 0 a W O z J 2i W v' coN Ww C W a W 2 QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL —�J WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG i (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE \ ��\ (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 �G 1 11 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.2 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' /000, 4 con t` i /� � \\\ `���•'� `Shote ♦ R017 OR Ro�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC �\% LU \A U � Q J Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------/ , o:6 a Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS EASEMENT AREAS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT SUMMARY (based on proposed/reaffrpned easement condition) TOTAL EASEMENTAREA / / AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN EASEMENT AREAS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT SUMMARY (based on proposed/reaffrpned easement condition) TOTAL EASEMENTAREA 9714 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN (including existing pavement from 196 [sf] adjacent property) OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN f 200 [sf] (temporary, annually) SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 U Lu O a co In L0 2 O 0 LUU a 0 0 co M V LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z z Y W z 2 ° a Uj 0 z J 2E W Ln >N N W Lu Cn W a (D W 2 QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.3 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' / V �, o \ �\ FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION ` l� EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE \ \ \ WETLAND A, TYP. II %%\\ ase \\ �-� l� I O� I ;I I �I I� l i ♦tx / Most westerly corner of Lot \\ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ ----- OF "OF SPRING PARK LOTS v�9 FLOWAGE AND CONSERVFON EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE ►` WETLAND A, TYP. 9� \ 'A% % \ %% Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------/' _ Flo / 00071, G i do - / SITE PLAN LEGEND: / - - PROPERTY LINE / SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 R017 0 0 Ro�e a o 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U Lu O a co In L0 O 0 0 LdU a 0 0 co M V LO J Cy') J LO z z Y W z 2 0 a LUJ 0 z J 2E W Ln N N W Lu Cl) W a (D W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C2.4 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS 29.91 �MAZC`H 29.65 29.66 7C M H '0■ `��vIATCH 0 as i" I�i __ _ /'�, �• li��j ' - 6� \�\ ♦` 29.12 MATCH 00 MATCH 29.43 30.38 ,'� `� \ i MATCH MATCH /!��` 'i ♦ --Q 29.49 MATCH r \ 930 9,32 1%\ 29.34 O ♦ 3r s \ MATCH 33. 0 ♦ o 29.13 �OJ� �\ \ 34.0. / 9 �. \ MATCH \\ \ ♦♦ `33.00 `�\\\ \ 29.09 3 0 9� ♦ MATCH30.93 !/ MAIC � \ (9 MATCH � � �` � � J 3.50 34.00 34.00 033.00 MATCH `4411,% 13.50 �`�� ® % 31.47 34.00 MA H FFE=934.00 \. 34.00 1% \ �v ,D 33. �% \ �rn 34.00 1 / �` 29.49 31.52 34.00 \�\ MATCH GRADING LIMITS MATCH \� 34.00 ^ 2 � \ � \ �'♦ SB -2 9 e ` 29.53 �\\33.50 33.60 4.00 3j ` �� ♦' MATCH \ 34.0031 77 1 \ \� MATCH 34.00 3 88 ♦ ,� I �\ �\ 1-110 28.92 DO `I ' \ \ 34.00 33.74 .37 / O �� \ MATCH \ \ 33.33 33.33 \ 31.40 / 34.00 34.00 \ MATCH �� ,.004 3.16 and 1/2" Iron Pipe---- `33.24 3 34.00 32.46 / S 4 '-32.29/ FFE=934.00 3 0 \ \ � 33.47 �� , .�i \ 34.00 34.00 / SEE INSET A \ A H, O DRAIN RUNOFF FROM 1. 2 5 1.70 OO 34'�JACENT PROPERTY ) / • ,♦ 'r TOWARD LAKE/LAGOON •00 �vv 6/�THROUGH SWALE, TYP. •7 . H 30.66 1.46 34.00 07� MATCH \ 31.83 .% 32.43 / � \�% MATC ` 0 4 A CHF,�\I� \ ` 31.81 xx , / `` 1 / O �I I � \ ' HP 80 34.20 32.2 32.50 .// MATCH 1 i % 3179 33.01 I� 31.061 , .�• MA I� NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED l MATCI ^� / SITE SHOULD BE DIRECTED / rrIf/ 9 �� TOWARDS THE ADJACENT ATC�I► PROPERTY OWNER 32 MCH ^i i r � 31 Ir CO 32.09 /r '/ 3.3/ / G Floor MATC / ' S�Q r MATCH 24 ATC Found Spike ------_.- 4 Y� �t 0 by !J I Ap / 0) //p" \\f y Most westerly corner of Lot \' �' �0 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -- ��, �\' \ �6' O OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ o �0 L Most southerly corner of Lot cv 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \ O0O \\ 20 INSET A 4" oplar 3" i Ce 932 S 32. MA' EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATED 03-30-2016 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 914.80 TO 925.70 THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB -1 914.80 SB -2 919.10 SB -3 925.70 SB -4 924.90 REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. / 'x31.52 / 32.45 ' MATC 31.7 / / DRAIN UNOFF F OM ADJ ENT PR ERTY/yam"32.51 TO ARD LA LAG00 y`L/ MATCH ROUG WALE, XP. //32.55 32.07 MATCH' / 32.43 / 2.7 /r\TCH ` 33.80 // `32.63 HP 9335 MATCH NO RUNOFF FROM THE SED SITE SHOULD BE D TED TOWARDS THE r U C & ADJAC ROPERTY OWNER 34.20 MATCH M / i 65 6 / JMATCH I a r 33.01% MATCH » Poplar GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. .2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 881.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=891.00 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A ' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \ 1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE YY (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" (C R017 0 Ro�e cm G\ o U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C300 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. V LO J Cy') J LO Ln Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z aUj V o p z Q O J 2E J 0� O W i L N a Ili W w Q J 0- U) C O C:) M LU >Q> 3: z: (D W z Ln Q14 Lf)L0 J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C300 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot :>K 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ...... ----"'- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: EXISTING FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR EXISTING VOLUME=1,158CY of 50.93 BATCH i 1 31.77 MATCH `O341' 146 OF MATCH, •4v \ MATT \� MATCF♦\� \ �d G 31.06' MATCH �kh i / MCH L r% 32.09 A.2 4 NA � \ Hyd Most westerly corner of Lot 3 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -------- v OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED VOLUME=1,449CY 2 34.00 \ 00 FFE=934.00 34.00 ►�i Y, 00Rou\ \\\ 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 34.00 O 83 OOO 34.00 .07� , CO / M f 32.43 C \ 31.81 9� 4.00 I ATCHF�� � 1 ♦ gP I 33. 0 HP �'i 34.20 �s 32.24 32.50 ,♦ MATCH 31 7Z I - � 33.01 I ,♦ MATCH U JI ,G w o ATCH 0 31 i i i i 33.3 � G Floor G \ FLOODPLAIN LEGEND: E�= FLOODPLAIN - EXISTING & PROPOSED GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL co Lf) L0 G O 0 0 LUU a O C) (. M 0 LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z Z Y W z 2 0 0. ui O z J 2E W N W Lu Cl) ~ W a r_n _V W 2 QC14 Lf) J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C301 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. �� 4.00 33.60 -V � 34.00 34.00 O 34.00 33.74 37 33.33 03.33 31.40 �33 3.16 MATCH ` N X33.24 �� 12.46 �\ 32.29 �� `O341' 146 OF MATCH, •4v \ MATT \� MATCF♦\� \ �d G 31.06' MATCH �kh i / MCH L r% 32.09 A.2 4 NA � \ Hyd Most westerly corner of Lot 3 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -------- v OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED VOLUME=1,449CY 2 34.00 \ 00 FFE=934.00 34.00 ►�i Y, 00Rou\ \\\ 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 34.00 O 83 OOO 34.00 .07� , CO / M f 32.43 C \ 31.81 9� 4.00 I ATCHF�� � 1 ♦ gP I 33. 0 HP �'i 34.20 �s 32.24 32.50 ,♦ MATCH 31 7Z I - � 33.01 I ,♦ MATCH U JI ,G w o ATCH 0 31 i i i i 33.3 � G Floor G \ FLOODPLAIN LEGEND: E�= FLOODPLAIN - EXISTING & PROPOSED GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL co Lf) L0 G O 0 0 LUU a O C) (. M 0 LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z Z Y W z 2 0 0. ui O z J 2E W N W Lu Cl) ~ W a r_n _V W 2 QC14 Lf) J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C301 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS .• 29.91 �h1+41H �••---929.4 29.65 29.66 MATCH �. w ■ ■. \�gTCH / ♦\ 29.12 MATCH DELINEATED WETLAND "A29.69 . ?,, ♦�% 3038 MATCH S c�0 / O- / 0 931 t w 932 ♦ `_..g318 oor, �X \ \ 33. 0 34.0 ♦ \ 3 �� 30 93 \ M T i 3.5\0 34.00 34 3 27 -4 TCH � \ -'33. 0 .5' 1.47 \ 34.00 \ F ,,-29.43 MATCH /O 29.49 MATCH -9T DELINEATED WETLAND "B" -Oji 9 (TO BE FILLED) v 29.34 MATCH DELINEATED WETLAND (TO BE FILLED) s 29.13 �6/ !/ MATCH 6 937 \\ O 29.09 MATCH )0 X 0 9�� E=934.00 \ DELINEATED WETLAND "A" 34.00 \ 9�� (TO BE FILLED) 9 ` 33. ♦� 34.00 29.49 1.52 34.00 ' ♦ \ \ MATCH GRADING LIMITS TCH 34.00 \ .21 29.53 33.60 34.00 937 ♦`� MATCH � 34.00 � 5g� � .� ♦ 31.77 34.00 ^h 3 88 \ ATCH / nO 28.92 MATCH `% 0� \ 34.00 33.74 .37 5C 'p `% : / 33.3) 33 ♦ �3�33 � %% 1.40 TCH 933 4 3.16 34.00 34.00 rnM 6 `33 34.00 �` . 32.46 � \ i\ '-32.29/ / FFE=934.00 ♦ 0 . / 33,47 0.3 34.00 34.00N.� ATC OO DRAIN RUNOFF FROM 31. 2 .�♦ 1.70 OO\ 34'JACENT PROPERTY3 .00 ♦ TOWARD LAKE/LAGOON �`L �� •/ `\\` . 5G � ♦ OOH THROUGH SWALE, TYP. '7 . ♦ H(I • � �� 10 1 46 X 34.00♦♦ ��� 5 M 'T H 31.83 32.43 / "� ♦ �5 / ♦ AT 31.81 3 4.00///A 9TCHF,'� `� ♦ 0 / 1 1 33.80 HP 34.20 / 31 79 32.2 132.50 / .♦♦ MATCH / 29.0' � `- ♦ 33.01 . ♦ 1 . 1 i ./ MATCH NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED di SITE SHOULD BE DIRECTED i9 TOWARDS THE ADJACENT ATCH PROPERTY OWNER !✓ i o ' M1 32 I 1 i � � 31 )� � O 32.09 Floor 32.24 � �`S�QG / MATCH GP / A / '4 ' Found Spike ...... � 444\ i i \ Hyd. / \ Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot � � \- 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ / OF SPRING PARK LOTS 7O WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS TABLE: WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BUFFER WIDTH MINIMUM 12.5 LF MAXIMUM 50 LF AVERAGE 25 LF BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS: BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS LENGTH OF WETLAN D A WITH LESS THAN 69 LF 12.5' BUFFER WIDTH AREA OF WETLAND A BUFFER NOT 1725 SF PROVIDED FOR 69' LENGTH (25' BUFFER) PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS TABLE: WETLAND AREA TABLE 9,871 SF TOTAL WETLANDA (ON SITE) 9,546 SF UNDISTURBED 325 SF FILLED WETLAND B 168 SF FILLED WETLAND/BUFFER MITIGATION TABLE: WETLAND MITIGATION TOTAL PROPOSED FILL AREA (WTLNDs A&B) REQUIRED MITIGATION - 2:1 ON-SITE PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION AREA: (MITIGATION TO OCCUR OFFSITE) BUFFER INFORMATION EXISTING PERIMETER OF WETLAND A PROPOSED PERIMETER OF WETLAND A REQUIRED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA: PROVIDED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA LEGEND 493 SF 986 SF 0 SF 994 LF 970 LF 24,250 SF 25,594 SF WETLAND BUFFER - MnDOT SEED MIX 34-262 WET PRAIRIE. SPREAD AT 14.5 LBS/ACRE AND PER MnDOT SEEDING MANUAL. WETLAND MONUMENT SIGN - COORDINATE TYPE AND SPACING WITH MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A ' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \ 1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE YY (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" (CRO17HO O N__��) GO O M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA . I DEVELOPMENT, LLC U J Lu O d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C302 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. V LO J Cy') J LO Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z 0. Ujz V o0 Q O J J � O W i L N a LU W w >m Q J 0 U) V♦ O C:) M LU >Q> 3: Z: (D W 2 In Q14 InL0 U J Lu O d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C302 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS /,---- Jr_ 929.4 co` `` ftb 10 N"N i /i UNDERGROUND STORMWATER \ DETENTION SYSTEM 2 \ 12" PERF. CMP \ (2) HEADERS \ 12" SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION I\ �' 6" STONE COVER FOOTPRINT=17.0'x64.0' IE 12" CMP=930.00 /V \ OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 < MH Top *24 OE 6" ORIFICE=930.40 In v. 921.2�� c OE 6" ORIFICE=930.50 +' TOP 12" CMP=931.00 TOP STONE=931.50 100 -YR HWL=931.38 «l, GRADING LIMITS GUTTER REAR HALF OF HOUSES TO AREA DRAIN AND PIPE INTO UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, TYP. COORD. LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS W/ ARCH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE ON ALL PVC CONNECTIONS TO (UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS � CONNECT TO EXISTIN� SANITARY STUB CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ` \ LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING( \\ ; SANITARY SERVICE. REP( , FINDINGS TO ENGINEER %\ 922LF 2" PVC STORM @ 1.05% 'OQ 22LF 6"x2 PVC \ �:O STORM @ 3.32%, ' O 2.86% � 0 �\ \n STUB 21VAT v / SERVICE TO WI IN 5' O 29LF 2" PVC H FROM HC�kJSE QO STORM @ 0.79% / Top 931.06 �T � Inds 926.36 r- %\ %\ r `` q2 ar \ ♦ / \ \' \% \ \ r \ l� i 1 � op 9A Inv. 9' 's I . r 1' ♦ ,� / WET TAP (2) SERVICES TO EXISTING WATER ' STUB. COORDINATE W/ r / CITY i v�9 _O l/ \\ O (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. (�5 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLG(V)T9 INFLOW, TYP. ;zp9 4 54LF 10" PVC STORM @ 0.50% l \ / 4rJ HDPE FES 1 I E=±929.50 RIPRAP TO NWL INSTALL NON -RETURN VALVE-T`O DISALLOW LAKE/FLOOD WATER FROM ENTERING SYSTEM. INSTALL CONCRETE HEADWALL AND v \ DENT GUARD PER MANUF. SPECS. PROVIDE CLAY LINER / / \ BENEATH AND ON SIDES \ OFUNDERGROUND /- NYLOPLAST MH 1 \ FILTRATION SYSTEMS, TYP. RI M=932.00 I E=929.77 29LF 4"x2 PVC STORM @ 1.66% (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLOW INFLOW, TYP. UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM 1 12" PERF. CMP Found n d 1 2'� I r0 (� HEADERS 1 SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION 6" STONE COVER / STUB 2" WATER �� / �h .� FOOTPRINT=11.0'x64.0' SERVICE TO WITHIN 5' IE 12" CMP -930.00 FROM HOUSE / .�/ OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 OE (x2) 4" ORIFICE=930.25 TOP 12" CMP=931.00 / �•/G 1 TOP STONE=931.50 100 -YR HWL=931.47 / �% vN i / ��/ / P / CON 4ECT TO EXISTING s.- SANITARY STUB / 4" P /or CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY / ../, 6 LOCATION, SIZE, AND Poplar ELEVATION OF EXISTING / :/l. SANITARY SERVICE. REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER 2" COPPER WATER / SERVICE. COORDINATE / SIZING W/ MECHANICAL DESIGNING IN HOUSE / SPRINKLER SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 / CON TO VERIFY LOCA N, SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING 1_ / x 4444 �`�' I WATER SERVICE. REPORT Found Spike ,may FINDINGS TO ENGINEER / \ Hyd. \ Most westerly corner Lot MH \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----" ION ----- /s, OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS CITY OF ORONO UTILITY NOTES: 1. TELEVISE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ONCE SANITARY SEWER STUBS ARE EXPOSED AND LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION ARE FIELD VERIFIED, LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF SERVICE CONNECTION SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. GRADING FLOODPLAIN NOTES (CITY & WATERSHED): 1. FILLING IN THE FLOODPLAIN WILL BE MITIGATED ON SITE AT A 1:1 VOLUME RATIO. 2. PER CITY OF ORONO RULES, THE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION (LIFE) OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 932.5 OR HIGHER. 3. PER MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RULES, THE LOW OPENING OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 933.5 OR HIGHER. UTILITY LEGEND: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL CATCH BASIN MANHOLE GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER PVC STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP 4 (C 0 \0\\ Ro\e G3 O M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 0) co U) LID2 O 0 O U a > O CO M LO J co J L0 z z Y W z O a UU 0 z J 2E W `6 N N W LU W a CD W 2 Lo QN J 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C4.0 QCOPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' U) LU o= Q z J d LU_ LU F-- 0- ao 0 J W Z W W LL 0 BUILDING DOWNSPOUT REFER TO ARCH'L EXTEND DOWNSPOUT AND POINT DOWN OVER 6 �I II Compacted Backfill CENTER OF GRATE- BII 8"X8" NYLOPLAST=,1_ = 0 5Bc_ - 2000# Concrete RECTANGULAR, DUCTILE 'I 1111'-1111' "'-"' "' "'I LOAD FACTOR 2.3 /SLOPE TO - .5Bc "Bc" Denotes outside SLOPE TO DRAIN IRON GRATE, OR Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe CLASS A DRAIN APPROVED EQUIVALENT Concrete backfill to 0.5 ~8" of outside diameter with 6, shaped bedding. • TIP =I COMPACTED SOIL ° — 8" GRATE TO 4" PIPE INLINE ° - DRAIN ADAPTER 1=1 I CONCRETE COLLAR ON COMPACTED BACK FILL 4" PVC SEWER RISER PIPE ~12" (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 4" PVC LONG RADIUS 4 BEND SEWER ELBOW 4" PVC SEWER PIPE Jo 0 0 ^o CRUSHED AND COMPACTED STONE DOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTION NTS DIA +3' MATERIAL 1'-6" (MIN) 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL NTS 4" THICK \RD (USE 2-2" MASTIC ALL JOINTS 4TION BOARD DOWN EPTH. 12" III Compacted Backfill T- B c i- -1_ + + ++K�=2+ o. + +I�I- + + Course Filter Aggregate I�I Bc/4 but not'=j_ + + + + + IF, III- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. less than 6" -1 + + + + + + Bc/4 but not' Fess than 6" -I 1' 11' 111-111-1 1 1— 1' LOAD FACTOR 1.9 Bc+12" Min. Bc" Denotes outside CLASS B diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material I I Bc Compacted Backfill _-IIIIIIII_ LOAD FACTOR 1.5 ��07,5�Bc Il'Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C-1 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soil BIIIIII- Compacted Backfill A -I - + a + + +-11111 Course Filter Aggregate + + + + + + —II MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. II-III - LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Be" Denotes outside CLASS C-2 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS -1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1- 12" + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Bc +++++++++ 1_ + I =1 + + + I- ' =1 + + 1= ++ 6" + + + + + + + 1— 11-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I- Min.=Bc+12 "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe Compacted Backfill Granular Borrow (MnDOT Spec. 3149A modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS Compacted - 1I Backfill Ith, x(11= I_I+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I_I 12" Bedding __ + + + + + + BC + + + + + + I- I- �1 + + + + + + + + + + I- =1_ + + + + + + + + + + + =1 + + + + + + + + + + 6" Foundation — / / / / �akyle/ "—III—III—III—III— Course Filter "Bc" Denotes outside Minimum Aga. (MnDot Spec. diameter of pipe 2d+Bc+12" 3149H Modified) PIPE FOUNDATION R BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS CROURO sRote a n C:D M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE VIS DEVELOPMENT, LLC I- U W O a T—T V/ M L0 L0 5z G O 0 0 LuU Q O O CO M Lo J M J Ln L0 z z W z 20 a LU z Oz J 2 W N W Lu CO 0 ~ C ~ W Q 2 (D W z LO QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY CIVIL DETAILS C5.0 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS /�� Jr_929.4 co` ag h �2k7 ;X$78 6 i � 1 2 3 a7/ 1 ' ' 2 9 6 t 8 ♦ �, '' 7 5 6 ao l� �t 2 3 4E 1147 GRADING LIMITS049 \ \ V4 j[ /C O� I \ � 7 / \ \ \ O76' 0 01 30\ \ r17 A&28 29 023 24 40 \ g25 026 \ ' 9 t, \ .� \\ 6 \♦\ '♦ Xbp35 Found 1/2" Iron Pipe a5 4/r- / G \ ♦ 333 $ 8 .•/ / \ 3,. ./ 3.. \ ♦ 2 0 Spruc pruce 4 l� .. / / `1 Poplar )P tar 5 ..• Poplar / 0 4 3 9 3 / CO / // / • 33.3 / G Floor otx Found Spike- ---------- // X4444 / Most westerly corner of Lot \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ -- ..... ........... OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ / Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS m No , DBH , SPECIES r CONDITION r REMOVED 919 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 920 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 921 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 922 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 923 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 924 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 925 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 926 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 927 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 928 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 929 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 930 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 931 11 BOXELDER POOR YES 932 14 BOXELDER POOR YES 933 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 934 10 BOXELDER POOR YES 935 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 936 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 937 21 BOXELDER FAIR YES 938 19 BOXELDER FAIR YES 939 19 BOXELDER POOR YES 940 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 941 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 942 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 943 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 944 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 945 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES 946 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 947 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES 948 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 949 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 950 11 BOXELDER POOR YES 951 16 BOXELDER POOR YES 952 12 BOXELDER POOR YES 953 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 954 14 BOXELDER FAIR YES 955 21 BOXELDER POOR YES 956 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 957 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 958 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 959 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 960 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 961 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 962 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 963 10 BOXELDER POOR YES 964 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 965 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 966 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 967 2-8 BOXELDER POOR YES 968 2-8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 969 7 ELM FAIR YES 970 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 971 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 972 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 973 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 974 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 975 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 976 6 ELM FAIR YES 977 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 978 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 979 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 980 6/8 ELM POOR YES 981 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 982 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 983 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 984 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 985 11/11 BOXELDER POOR YES 986 6 BOXELDER POOR YES r REMOVALS LEGEND: O IV OR O 987 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YESRS R� 988 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES (m G3 CD U P 989 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 990 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES CivilSiteGroup.com 991 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 992 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 993 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 994 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 995 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 996 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 997 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LAKE W�EST 998 8/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 999 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1000 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1001 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1002 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1003 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1004 6/6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1005 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1006 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1007 8/18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1008 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1009 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1010 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1011 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1012 9/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1013 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1014 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1015 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1016 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1017 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1018 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 1019 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO 1020 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES J � 1021 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES J LO 1022 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES LOz 1023 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1024 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES M Y 1025 22 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1026 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO Z L!7 1027 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES z 1028 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Uj a LL! 1029 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES O z 1030 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Z J 1031 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES Lfi 1032 8 ELM POOR YES O > N 1033 9 ELM FAIR YES a LU$ 1034 10 BASSWOOD POOR YES W LU 1035 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES Q Q — J � 1036 11 ELM FAIR YES 0- (n 1037 10 ELM POOR YES 1038 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES — 1039 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES � W j 1040 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES cY) _> 1041 7 ELM FAIR YES (� 1042 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES W 2 1043 7 MAPLE FAIR YES N 1044 13 ELM FAIR YES LID 1045 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES U J 1046 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES w 1047 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES a EXISTING TREES TOTALTREES 129 FAIR CONDITION 103 REMOVED = 103 SAVED = 0 POOR CONDITION 26 REMOVED = 26 SAVED = 0 TREE REPLANTING EXISTINGTREES REMOVED 129 PROPOSED TREES 94 *SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED TREES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY #'0"' 4 I REVISION SUMMARY � � TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C6 ■ 01 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST PLANT SCHEDULE - TREES 29.4 cont�ou+r!2 _ PCW SYM QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS ftb SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST DECIDUOUS TREES -41 F * * + 1 - HB NRM 18 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM } * * * * * * + SEEDING ZONE C, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST ++++++ ++++ + FFSM 7 FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Bailsta' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / ++ ,++++ ++ * ++*+++ +++ ♦ 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. PCW 3 PRAIRIE CASCADE WEEPING WILLOW Salix'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++++ + + + + + + +\ ♦ RB 15 RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ++++++++ +++++ + ++ 2-SWO * + + + + + + + PB 5 PAPER BIRCH Betula papyrifera 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++ +++ + +++ + +++++ + + + + + + + + + + +�} ♦ SWO 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM « + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + +* + + + + 4 4 4 4 • 4 + + 2 pg + + + HB 2 HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++ ++ + ++++ + ++ +++ + + + +O C' ri + +*+* +++ ++ + +*+ +++ 4 -RB ORNAMENTAL TREES +*+++ + + a•'• ++++ +� ♦ ABS 5 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + ++++ THH 7 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli 'Inermis' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + +� * + + + + +' + + + O Carpinus caroliniana +,+ +*+*+ +* +*+*+ ':' + +* *+*} } ��� /� BB 5 BLUE BEECH p 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM .... + + + + + + • . • • : • : • + + + + + .. ++ .. ... +++ ++ 2 NRM �+ ++ +++ ++++++++`+ ♦` - -9� * + • O + EVERGREEN TREES + ++++++ ++++++{+++++ * « * * + {' '•'•'� + + + + C/ EVERGREEN BHS 5 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca'Densata' 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++++++ + ++*+*+*+*+ ♦ BEACH AREA +++� ++ + + ' ' ' •• ::jy 1 *+* ++++ ��� �j WP 7 WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + + / ++++ + s �% /��/A/ WC 9 WHITE CEDAR Thuja occidentalis 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + 4 J 4 + , + + I- �M �O * 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. *+++++++ ++; +++++ +* \ 7 3-FFSM` *} +*}* } + 4 -RB NATIVE SEEDING NOTES &SPECIFICATIONS: �. / \ 1 -RB 1 H + + + +`•,• : '• ♦ SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND",qq A NQL48 1. INSTALL ALL SEED MIXES PER SEED SUPPLIERS INSTRUCTIONS, OR EMPLOY SUPPLIER TO SEED MATERIAL CORRECTLY. *+*+* * +*+' '-•• \ j ++ SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND 1 T ANT 2. PLANTING OF SEED MATERIAL BUT BE ACCOMPANIED BY CONTINUED MAINTENANCE BY THE SEEDING COMPANY UNTIL FULL COVERAGE IS ESTABLISHED SEEDING ZONE C, SEE � «++ ++ + +* � � \\ '�. +++ LEGEND & PLANT LIST ++ + + *i ♦+* + \\ /*+*+ ij 1 �9 ++ �+*+ + + 2 -ABS ++ +++++++ +++++ 1 - SWO * ++++ , *♦ C ( ) ( ) + } + + ++ Oji ZONE PER PLAN A ZONE PER PLAN B + +++++ + \ cc\ + + + + + SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLAI�fi�ST + + *+ ++++++++ 93v'< `\++++++ +♦ MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. SEEDING ZONE B, SEE } + + + + + + \ \ �+ 3 -WC LEGEND & PLANT LIST 1 ++++++ ++ ++ +*+*+ 1 PB `\ \ ++* SEED MIX: SHORELINE WILDFLOWER MIX SEED MIX: POLLINATOR MIX FOR MESIC TO WET SOILS ++++ ++++++ + 2-SWO + + + ++ }*+*+*+*+, 1 - RB \` \ `o`P,` + + + ++++ �' \` BEACH AREA SEED MIX INFORMATION: SEED MIX INFORMATION: + + + + +++++++ + + k, _- �i �+++-+ v v SEEDING ZONE A, SEE *+*+ ++++++++++++�� �� ���� t, -+ + + �" t+ �vv♦ LEGEND & PLANT LIST + + +++r +/+ } + 4 + + 4 + + +++ ++++ rn ++ \ + 2 - FFSM +++ + ++ +*+*+ +*+*+ 1 BB r* />� X ♦♦ } + + ++ ++++ / \+ 3 RB \\\ +**++ - ++++ + ++ ++++++++.. \ 4 B ++ ++++ Soil Type: For that zone one foot higherthan waterelevation down to six inches lowerthan waterelevation Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 2-4ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: Broadcast: 1/2-11b./10, 000 sq. ft. Soil Type: Loam, Clay, Sand Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 3 to 6 ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: 4 ozs. pe r 1,000 sq. ft. + + + + + + + + 9 + + + ++�SEEDING ZONE B, SEE +* +++ + * + + ++' - `37+++++++++*++\ ♦ LEGEND &PLANT LIST GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): 1 -PCW \ + + + + + + a BLUE VERVAIN 15% GRASSES ++++++++' + + BIG BLUESTEM 5.00% \ *+*+*+ +*+*+* + 3 -THH _ / �++ + ++ +++++*+*+* *+`-2-A / ++* SEEDING ZONE A, SWAMP MILKWEED 12% ° \,A+ + + + + ` * * * SEE LEGEND &PLANT JOE-PYE WEED 11% CANADA WILD RYE 4.00% + + + + + + �� %c + + � �% + + + 4 �.� �.,,� A + + } } LIST SWEET FLAG 8% INDIAN GRASS 3.50% �+ + + + ++++++ '�0 \ �� �. �. Ind ++* *+ + +* *+ + / ��� ���� �.*+*+ .*+++ + �,� _ '�«' + + + ; ♦ BONESET 9% BLUEJOINTGRA55 3.25% %�\ ♦ BLACK-EYED SUSAN 6% ° ++++ FRINGED BROME 2.75/° * r +++ ++ r+ + +*++++**+* N r GIANT BUR -REED 6% LITTLE BLUES TEM 1.00% ++++ +*+* *2 -FFSM ♦ ♦ + GOLDEN ALEXANDER 6% SWITCH 0.25% LANDSCAPE NOTES: \+ 2-THH IRONWEED 6% WILDFLOWERS +,+.;,t+++++ + ++ WATER PLANTAIN 4% SWAMP MILKWEED 8.00% *+ + ++ - . FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 3% PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER 8.00% 1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE \ \ *++ *++ 1 - NRM 2 -NRM 0 i \+ ° ° SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER. OWNER'S \*'+* + COMMON OX -EYE 3/° JOE-PYE WEED 7.00% REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. \ ' k O 1 -THH + MEADOW BLAZING STAR 3% MEADOW BLAZING STAR 7.00% EDGING SHALL BE METAL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. ♦ \ \ O + 3 -WC TALL BLAZING STAR 2% TALL BLZING STAR 7.00% ♦ \ -: «+ + WP ARROWHEAD 2% BLUE VERVAIN 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD L * `� SA ° 7.00% MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING `♦ „ OO 1 - THH 1 PB :+++ MEADOW ROSE 1% GOLDEN ALEXANDER 6.25% BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A S O � }* 0 PAN ICLED ASTER 1% BON ESET 5.00% MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. O �5� RED -STALKED ASTER 1% COMMON OX -EYE 5.00% 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN 2 - RB \ ` �d / TALL MEADOW RUE 1% BLACK-EYED SUSAN 5.00% ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF \ ; ' / �� � 100% FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 3.00% HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND\ ♦ \ \\ 2 STIFF GOLDENROD 3.00% DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ♦ % ��. IRONWEED 3.00 *.y A PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE \` \ I + e ('0 ° PERIOD. ` ,';+� Bruce cy / WILD BERGAMOT 2.00% l� ;''+*+ ' YARROW 1.00% + 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY ++, P YARROW / ZONE(PER PLAN): C OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY 1 i ++ + CANADA MILK VETCH 1.00% VC SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. I 1 I In'+ + 1 - ABS / PAN ICLED ASTER 1.00% 1 MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. RE -STALKED ASTER 1.00% 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE I� WP SEED MIX: NORTHERN WET MEADOW WILDFLOWER MIX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE + / 100.00% CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT % I ,+ * SEED MIX INFORMATION: SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 9. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. a 11 -NRM 33.3.. x / r' � Floc, Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 cp i Found Spike --------- 4 10. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. H Most westerly corner Lot \�f \ MH \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION-------�--"'� � / 6,, , OF SPRING PARK LOTS �0 CITY OF ORONO LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACING BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES AND ANY UTILITY SERVICE THAT IS PROPOSED OR EXISTING AND TO REMAIN. Most southerly corner of Lot.b 01 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -- OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O \ CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR MECHANICAL WEEDER. b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCKTHORN) - REMOVE BY HAND, ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY WITH HERBICIDE. 3. NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY. 4. ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS, DEPENDING ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. 5. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORK TO FALL AND LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT. 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BY A TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR. Soil Type: Ideal forsites in the North Northeast part of the state Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 3-6ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: Broadcast:) -2 oz./1,000 sq. ft. GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): BLUE VERVAIN 13% SWAMP MILKWEED 12% JOE-PYE WEED 10% BO N ES ET 8% BLACK-EYED SUSAN 8% COMMON OX -EYE 6% GOLDEN ALEXANDER 5% SWEET FLAG 5% WATER PLANTAIN 5% ARROWHEAD 5% FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 4% WILD BERGAMOT 3% MEADOW ROSE 3% STIFF GOLDENROD 3% TALL MEADOW RUE 3% LARGE -LEAVED ASTER 2% PAN ICLED ASTER 2% RED -STALKED ASTER 2% YARROW 1% L N 100% LEGEND SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH SEED ZONE A, SEE SPECS. ABOVE PATH, SAMPLES REQUIRED, APPROX. 7,420 SF APPROX. 1,750 SIF SEED ZONE B, SEE SPECS. ABOVE SOD. APPROX 3,000 SY APPROX. 20,215 SF STANDARD BEACH SAND, ENSURE SEED ZONE C, SEE SPECS. ABOVE LOCAL SUPPLIER, SAMPLES APPROX. 4,000 SF REQUIRED. APPROX. 700 SF PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT TREE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PLANTING SIZES DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG AIPOL (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 20'-0" 10'-0" 0 20'-0" (CRO17HO O N__��) 00 O U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 0 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. LO J Cy') J LO ., Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z aUj U O p Z Q O J 2E J 0� O W i L N a LU W w Q J 0- U) > Cl)O M LUC:) >Q> 3: Z: (D W 2 Ln QL0 J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 0 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ---929--____ i - -929.4 con 017, , 10 / ♦ 00. 00 '0a /I - - - - - - - `':`�,♦ /^ 1 �%% ° \-- 932 D 42 S\ N\ H ,*., x 9 676 ` ��� & 7.5 lInv. � ,��,�` %s �+.rf�' 7 t k ` contour \ (D57 2 937 9 \\9 x Ol w, �1 �� >< x X90 7 \\ ♦ 08 \�, x j�130,, 214\ \\ \ ,��� 410 v \ L \x 7009 29\ x 6 C6. \ �� �x;3% � i. INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT 4%`\\\\,��� FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO 393 \ x� ______-- ♦ �; PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF \ 0 ------ - � x X131 \\ � % \ ` ` 4111 6 x 13 ♦ � `` / ` INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT �9� `�\ �� ` x 1.41' \ 32 \\ FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO \ �/ 1J* ° ` PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF �1 x 18 TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING \ ���� x 17 AREA, INSTALL AT EXISTING \\� %*. � x is x 19 x 21 GRADE, TYP. UPnn1 r`nnlr`1 1 1c1nA1 ♦ + 22 OF USE, RETUF c'o PREVIOUS CON INCLUDING AEF AND RE-ESTABI \ \\ + d� i\ ��� / TURF. \ T p 9.x'1\06 `A00 � Inds \6.J8\ y—� .. (S)\ ® �♦ 46 �o 77 ,i G ' ' 0 •♦ 4� G ♦♦ 5 s 'ice / i f 3» 0 �� pruce # i t < Spruce 11 G4 / Mr,' G14" � �i ��P lar / / I I o ,92 1 6 /' / / I I In 521 ..1 1 � �. / � , 6" x s / ;� / Poplar 0 �,. 0 G 40P1 4 1 9 41; DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE // / Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 M' Found Spike 1 A/ / I h I' 1 �y o �l H1H / 0) Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - - OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot , ORA i %I OA C NSTRUCTION ---- 3------ ENTRANCE / V I V I LIvIV I V lxLlvll llm VI 1 L11mL UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. CROURO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,I Matt Pavek DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 763-213-3944 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA zz_ :� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET / \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE \ (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U W O a a7 co In L0 0 0 O LUU a O O CO M LO J Cy') J LO LO ., Zz z Y W z 2 0 a L1J O z J W N W w rr�^ vJ W a ((D LLI I Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS swi 00 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' 92r-- i' ` 929.4 contour J------ 00 0 on MR mft i"9 I \ `%`♦ ��� ��I� �� `�♦ ro 931 •�0 i 2 Inv. ` y3j 5 contour N.,. Inv. v._ ♦ ` j \ \� 10 `4*4 � I' v 4,_ v \ ♦19 `\\�` INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF \ o� C 0 T p 9 3'106 IT 926,3\6 \ � y Vo. `ddcP 0 ♦ \ `� ♦ F.tO DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 I, ` Found Spike----- ------- ._ 4444`r��\ i \ Hyd. Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----------`"•� OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ � v \\ O `Q �c BOJ INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT ♦ FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF ARY MULCH PA ING �`. �� ,In IN LL AT EXISTIN TYP. WON CONCLU N RETUR ITE TO \\ `�`�♦ )US CONDITI ING AERATION F SOIL, ,9� TABLISH N OF o \ ,Q ii Dund 1/2" Iron Pipe i Ed�i CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE to 10�141.e o' i ' G IG� UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEMS TO REMAIN OFFLINE UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL —� DRAINAGE ARROW ■������������������■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE E S F_ 9— SH5-z-] TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA F11 zz_ :� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE We (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 (CROURO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U Lu O a co L0 O 0 O LUU a C) C) M LO J Cy') J LO LO n z z Y W z 2 0 a UUJ 0 z J W N W Lu Cn ~ W a W 2 Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP -PROPOSED CONDITIONS swi ■ (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ::RFLOW 10 /2 OF THE CURB K HEIGHT =RFLOW AT TOP OF FER ASSEMBLY (STING CURB, PLATE, BOX, ID GRATE .TER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" I -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT 3H -FLOW FABRIC NU I t5: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ER04C. � CURB INLET FILTER NTS 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP 35' R Q R_ Zoi 0 O C N A w TO CONSTRUCTION I m AREA z W I p Z C� PLAN 35' R TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE X Lu 75' MINIMUM EXISTING UNDISTURBED FINISHED GEOTEXTILE FILTER 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE ROADWAY SPEED BUMP GRADE 1 FABRIC I I PROFILE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. 'C' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NTS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH yr r r r r r rr r o r r rrr rrr \ .� OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF rr TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. rrr r 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET NTS 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. 0 T TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE ILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED ILLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO GROUND ririp:-� EMBED ROLL. I WPM SURFACE � Val DIRECTION OF FLOW co WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO - PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH cz N � SEDIMENT FENCE NTS FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12"O.C. (c Roly 0 Ro�e \ 03 Oo \ Co 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL uj DIRECTION OF FLOW 6„ a METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. > 0) co Lo Lo z O O 0 LuU a 0 O CO M V Lo J cy') J Lo Ln n z z Y W z 2 ° 0. ui z O z J 2E W N W Lu cl) ~ W a (D W 2 Ln QN Ln J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1 02 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 # MNR100001 PAGES 1-35) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP (PART III.A) THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (PART III.B) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) (PART III.C) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION (PART III.E): THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN PART II.C. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE PART IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL() AS REQS UIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III.F.1 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTION MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION PREVENTION (PART IV.B): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV.E. ARE COMPLIED WITH. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WITH PART IV.C.5. SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER (AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR) MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEED NOTES (PART III.A.4.A): ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. SEDIMENT CONTROL (PART IV.C): SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. a. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. b. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4, A. THROUGH C. c. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.G. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND THE PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. WHEN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BE OBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. HOWEVER, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. PERMISSION TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE) MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMPS SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEE PART IV.E.4.D.). THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BE LEFT UN -COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN PART III.B. OF THIS PERMIT DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (PART IV.D): DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (PART IV.E): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT. CONTINUE INSPECTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. THIS MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL. THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. SEE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (PART IV.F): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE; SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. FUELING OPERATION PLAN: ALL FUELING SHALL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS. SPILL PREVENTION PLAN: ALL SPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY. THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAY ONSITE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES, POSTING CLEAN UP RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL. SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE: SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND SANITARY CONDITION, FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES. A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS. FINAL STABILIZATION (PART IV.G): THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF THE SITE (THAT HAS NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION) TO ANOTHER PARTY. A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION / PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER. THE ORIGINAL CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES TRAINING (PART III.A.2 DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 1/13/14-1/13/14 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2017 OWNER INFORMATION LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 CONTACT: CURT FRETHAM (C 0 R0�� Ro�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART III.A.4.B&C): I LAKE VIS SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 8,996 SF EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 2,837 SF PROPOSED LOT2 OUTLOTA 15,272 SF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING COVERAGE 0 5F 0.0% 4,653 5F 16.0% 7,296 5F 12.3/0 0 5F 0.0% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner ■ LLE ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 22,827 SF 78.4% 50,243 SF 84.8% 2,901 SF 50.6% TOTAL SITE AREA 94,080 SF 100.0% 29,103 SF 100.0% 59,239 SF 100.0% 5,738 SF 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 8,996 SF 9.6% OUTLOT A 2,837 SF 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL ( LOT 1 + LOT 2 + OUTLOT A) 18,109 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 14,970 SF 15.9% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 74,000 SF SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL 2,700 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±0 EA NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 0110611 %1:11:4101 CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIREMENTS. THE REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT RE Q Q PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING VACANT SITE WITH EXTENSIVE TREE GROWTH INTO A RESIDENTIAL SITE WITH 2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART III.C. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. 2. POST CONSTRUCTION:THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART III.D. SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE PART III.D.1. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. 0) co LID LID 2 C O LUU a O O CO M LO J Cy') J LID Ln n z z Y W z 2° lig UJ z 0 z J W L0 N N W Lu V ♦ I` >_ W a W 2 Ln N QL0 J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1 3 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ''1Illte Gr R 4 U P - Minnesota Pollution Attachment A; Control Agency S 20 Lafayette Road North S PPP Site Specific Document St, Paul, MN 55155-4194 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity Doc Type-, SlorrnwaterPollutwn Praveriiorr Plan Construction Activity information Project name: IVY PLACE Project location (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) Address or describe area: 3606 IVY PLACE City or Township: ORONO State: MN Zip code: 55391 Latitudellongltude of approximate centroid of project_ 44,926034,-93-613450 Method of collection of Iatitudeflongitude: ❑ GPS F1 Online tool ❑USGS Topographic map All cities where construction will occur: OIRONO All counties where construction will occur: HENNEPIN All townships where construction will occur. Project size (number of acres to be disturbed): 1.7 Project type: M Residential ❑ Commerciallindustrfal ❑ Road construction ❑ Residential and road construction ❑ Other (describe): Cumulative Impervious surface: Existing area of impervious surface: 0.0 (lo the nearest tenth acre) Post construction area of impervious surface: 0.4 (to the nearest tenth acre) Total new area of impervious surface: DA (to the nearest tenth acre) Receiving waters Type I Special water? I Impaired Water?** (ditch, pond, wetland, lake, (See Stormwater Permit (See Stormwater Permit Water bodv ID* I Name of water Yes LJ No I L Yes LJ No ❑ Yes ❑ No I ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ©No I ❑ Yes El No Water Body identification (0) mfght not be available for alt water bodies. Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search Tool ar: 4vww acastatemn fjslwa€erlstormwaierlstarmwiter-r.htmt. Impaired water for rhe following pollutants] or stressors/: phosphorus, turbldity, dissofved oxygen, or biotic impairment. www.Fc a.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitablein alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4173104 & 8116113 Page 1 of 7 C bite G R O U P - Dates of construction (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs- Include address if available.) Construction start date: 04/0112018 Estimated completion date: 0410112019 General Construction Project Information Describe the construction activity (what will be built, general timeline, etc): THE PROJECT WiLL BE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON A EXISTING VACANT SITE. Describe soil types found at the project: THE EXISTING SOILS AT THE SITE ARE PRIMARILY SANDY LEAN CLAYS. Site Location map- Attach maps (U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle, National Wetland Inventory maps or equivalent) showing the location and type of all receiving waters, Including wetlands, drainage ditches, stormwater ponds or basins, etc. that will receive runoff from the project. Use arrows showing the direction of flow and distance to the water body !' _..r CARMAN � f BAY TdQ CA ' •• y j s t' C i vi I S ie t e Ca R Q U P - General. Site Information (iil.A) 1. Describe the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). Include the timing for installation and procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary. (III.A.4.a) THE PROJECT WILL BE PROTECTED BY TWO (2) MAIN BMP°S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SiTE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED. 2, Attach to this SWPPP a table with the anticipated quantities for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (Ill. A. 4.b) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. Attach to this SWPPP a site map that includes the following features (III.A.3.b - f): . Existing and final grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre and post-constnaction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. • Locations of impervious surfaces and soil types. • Locations of areas not to be disturbed. Location of areas of phased construction • All surface waters and existing wetlands within one mile from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater runoff from the site (identifiable on maps such as USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent). Where surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. Methods to be used for final stabilization of all exposed sail areas - 4. Were stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an environmental, archaeological, or other required local, state, or federal review of the project? ❑ Yes R No If yes, describe haw these measures were addressed in the SWPPP. (iII.A.6.) NIA 5. Is the project located in a karst area such that additional measures would be necessary to protect drinking water supply management areas as described in Minn- R. chapters 7050 and 7060? ❑ Yes Y❑ No If yes, describe the additional measures to be used. (iII.A.7.) NIA 6, Does the site discharge to a calcareous fen listed In Minn. R. 7D50-01 80, subp. 6.b.? LJ Yes Lxj No If yes, a letter of approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources must be obtained prior to application for this permit. (Part 113.6 and Part I1I.A.8) 7. Does the site discharge to a water that is listed as impaired for the following pollulant(s) or stressor(s): phosphorus, turbidity, dissolved oxygen or biotic impairment? Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search TDD! at: www. pca.state.mn.usfwaterfstormwaterlstormwale r-c,html, 0 Yes X No If no, skip to Training. Does the impaired water have an approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) with an Approved Waste Load Allocation for construction activity? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes: a. List the receiving water, the areas of the site discharging to it, and the pollutant(s) identified in the TMDL. b. List the BMPs and any other specific construction stormwater related implementation activities identified in the TMDL. If the site has a dis=charge point within one mile of the impaired water and the water flows to the impaired water but no specific BMPs for construction are identified in the TMDL, the additional BMPs in Appendix A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4 -trout stream)) must be added to the SWPPP and implemented. (III.A.7). The additional BMPs only apply to those portions of the project that drain to one of the identified discharge points. www.pca.sLate.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4J73104 rr 8176113 Page 3 of 7 ivid lite G R C1 U P - NIA 9. Identify adjacent public waters where the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has declared "work in water restrictions" during fish spawning timeframes NIA Selection of a Permanent Stormwater Management System (111. D.) 1. Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal to one acre? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, a water quality volume of fine inch of runoff from the cumulative new impervious surfaces must be retained on site (see Part IIID of the permit) through infiltration unless prohibited due to one of the reasons in Part 111-0.1.j- If infiltration is prohibited identify other method of other volume reduction (e.g., filtration system, wet sedimentation basin, regional ponding or equivalent method 2. Describe which method will be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project (111.13): • Wet sedimentation basin • InfiltrationlFiltratlon • Regional ponds ■ Combination of practices Include all calculations and design information for the method selected. See Part IIID of the permit for specific requirements associated with each method. I NFI LTRATIONIFILTRATION Calculations are within the Site Storm Water Management Report and part of this SWPPP as Attachment D. 3. If it is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, describe why. This can include proximity to bedrock or roadprojects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of anypermanent stormwater management practices. Describe what other treatment, such as grasses swates, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, will be implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters. (III.C) IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. 4. For projects that discharge to trout streams, including tributaries to trout streams, identify method of incorporating temperature controls into the permanent stormwater management system. Erosion Prevention Practices (IV.B) Describe the types of temporary erosion prevention Bill expected to be implemented on this site during construction: 1. Describe construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to minimize erosion. Delineate areas not to be disturbed (e.g., with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. SiLT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE, 2. Describe Methods of temporarily stabilizing soils and soil stockpiles (e.g., mulches, hydraulic tackifers, erosion blankets, etc.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. (�a y '� 3. Describe Methods of dissipating velocity along stormwater conveyance channels and at channel outlets (e.g., check dams, •\ sediment traps, rip rap, etc.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL OUTLETS, Y 4. Describe Methods to be used for stabilization of ditch and Swale wetted perimeters (Note that mulch, hydraulic soil tackifiers, hydromulches, etc. are not acceptable soil stabilization methods for any part of a drainage ditch or swaie) FINAL STABILLZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD, ividSite G R Co U P - 5. Describe Methods to be used for energy dissipation at pipe outlets (e.g., rip rap, splash pads. gabions, etc. RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS. 6. Describe Methods to be used to promote infiltration and sediment removal on the site prior to offsite discharge, unless infeasible (e.g., direct stormwater flow to vegetated areas): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILZED. 7. For drainage or diversion ditches describe practices to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to surface water. The last 200 lineal feet must be stabilized within 24 hours after connecting to surface waters and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased for all discharges to Special, Impaired or "work in water restrictions". All other remaining portions of the temporary or permanent ditches or swates within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water, property edge and construction in that area has temporarily or permanently ceased. NIA - NO DITCHES ON SITE 8. Describe additional erosion prevention measures that will be implemented at the site during construction (e.g., construction phasing, minimizing soil disturbance, vegetative buffers, horizontal slope grading, slope drainingAerracing, etc.): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT NOT LiMITED TO; MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE. 9. If applicable, include additional requirements in Appendix A Part C.3 regarding maintaining a 104 -foot buffer zone or installing redundant BMPs for portions of the site that drain to special waters). N/A 10. If applicable, describe additional erosion prevention BMPs to be implemented at the site to protect planned infiltration areas MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREA. Sediment Control Practices (IV.C) Describe the methods of sediment control BMPs to be Implemented at this site during construction to minimize sediment impacts to surface waters, including curb and gutter systems 1. Describe Methods to be used for down gradient perimeter control: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. 2. Describe Methods to be used to contain soil stockpiles: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY. 3. Describe Methods to be used for storm drain inlet protection: SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS. 4. Describe Methods to minimize vehicle tracking at construction exits and street sweeping activities: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. Describe Methods, If applicable, additional sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to be installed to keep runoff away from planned infiltration areas when excavated prior to final stabilization of the contributing drainage area: INFILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 6. Describe methods to be used to minimize soil compaction and preserve top soil (unless infeasible) at this site: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED. 7. Describe plans to preserve a 50 -foot natural buffer between the project's sod disturbance and a surface water or plans for redundant sediment controls if a buffer is infeasible: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. THIS PROJECT WILL DISTURB WITHIN WETLANDS BUT WILL WORK TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS 8. Describe plans for use of sedimentation treatment chemicals (e,g., polymers, flocculants, etc.) see Part IV,G,10 of the permit:. NIA Civil Site G R O U P - Pollution Prevention Management Measures (IV.I=) 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: I S ! ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEM CAL . WILL BE SEALED AND STARED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE, 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic Ruids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7435: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SiTE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent Upping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE. 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. Final Stabilization (IV.G) 1. Describe method of final stabilization (permanent cover) of all disturbed areas: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT. SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS 2. Describe procedures for completing final stabilization and terminating permit coverage (see Part W.G.1-5): UPON FINAL STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. Documentation of infeasibility: (If Applicable) www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitabte in alternative formats wq-strm2•12 • 4173104 fir 811611.? Page 5 of 7 wq•strm2•12 * 4173104 & 8116113 Page 7 of 7 CivilSite G R CDP U P - 9. Is the project required to install a temporary sediment basin due to 10 or more acres draining to a common location or 5 acres or more if the site is within 1 mile of a special or impaired water? ❑ Yes E No If yes, describe (or attach plans ) showing how the basin will be designed and constructed in accordance with Part III.0 of the permit. NIA (CROURO sRote c� n o U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC Dewatering and Basin Draining (IV.D) 1. Will the project include dewatering or basin draining? 0 Yes M No tU LI If yes, describe measures to be used to treaUdispose of turbid or sediment -laden water and method to prevent erosion or scour of discharge points (see Part IV. D of the permit): d 2. Will the project include use of filters for backwash water? []Yes ®No if yes, describe how filter backwash water will be managed on the site or properly disposed (see Part III.D.3. of the permit): Additional BMPs for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands (Appendix A, Parts C and D) 1. Special Waters. Does your project discharge to special waters? ❑ Yes ® No 2. If proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices, then other treatment such as grassed swates, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. Describe what other treatment will be provided. NA 3, Describe erosion and sediment controls for exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope to a special waters, and temporary sediment basins for areas that drain five or more acres disturbed atone time. N/A 4. Describe the undisturbed buffer zone to be used (not less than 100 linear feet, from the special water). NiA S. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will ensure that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the t, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. 6. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting in the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events. NIA 7 Wetland . Does your project discharge stormwater with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland (e.g-, , conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond)? ❑ Yes Z No If Yes, describe the wetland mitigation sequence that will be followed in accordance with Part D of Appendix A. N/A Inspections and Maintenance (IV.E) Describe procedures to routinely inspect the construction site: .. Once every seven (7) days during active construction and, . Within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches In 24 hours, and within seven (7) days after that. Inspections must include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, and infiltration areas. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT'ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST." www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or S00-657-3864 Available in alternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 500-657-3864 Avaitabte in atternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitabte in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4J 73104 & 8136113 Page 2 of 7 wq•strrn2-f2 • 4J 73104 Sr 8116113 Paye 4 of 7 wq-strm2.12 • 4113104 5r 81 16113 Page 6 of 7 M co LO L0 2 O 0 O U -1U a \: O O (fl M to J 0- C'7 J to to in Z Z Y Wz O Z O Z J W Lfo N Ww 1..-- U) (n W a 3: 3: W 2 QN J 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS QCOPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM .� Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 La fayrar Rood Nuo tr i St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 moi. , ! x v ite n R O U P ATTACHMENT B: Construction stormwater Inspection Checklist Construction Stormwater Program .r]rr. 7yr�: Fl.fm;ffpn. [:n=r-v.s' Note: This inspection report does not address all aspects of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/St ate Disposal System (NP1)ESIS DS) Construction Stormwat.er permit {Permit} issued on August 1, 2013. The completion of this checklist does not guarantee that all permit requirements are in compliance; it is the responsibility of the Permittee(s) to read and understand the permit requirements. Facility Information Site name: Facility address: Permit number: City: State: Zip code: Inspection Information Inspector name: Phone number.- Date umber:Date (mmlddlyyyy): Time: ❑ am ❑ pm Is the inspector certified in sediment and erosion control and it is documented in the Starmwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this inspection routine or in response to a storm event: Rain Fall amount (if applicable) Is site within one aerial mile of special or impaired water? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, Follow Appendix A and other applicable permit requirements. Note: If NA is selected at anytime, specify why in the comment area for that section. Erasion Control Requi rement (Part IV.B) www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page i of 4 I f ite G R b U P 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ I ❑ ❑ Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part IV.C.) Yes Yes No NA 1. Soil stabilization vahere no construction activity for 14 days? r7 da s wereapplicable) El 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? ❑ 2. Has the need to disturb steep slopes been minimized? 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? 13 ❑ 3, All ditches stabilized 200' back from p oint of disch arg a within 24 hours? Not mulch) ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are there erosion BMP's for onsite stock iIas? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Are appro PHate BM P's installed protectin g inIAsloutlets? ❑ 7. Are all infiltration systems staked and marked to avoid com action? ❑ www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page i of 4 I f ite G R b U P 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ I ❑ ❑ Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part IV.C.) Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control BM Ps (Part IV. E.) Yes No I NA 1. Perimeter control installed on all down gradient perimeter s? Ll F1 El 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? ❑ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? ❑ ❑ ❑ IF No, have redundant sediment controls been installed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Inlet proteetion on all catch basins and culvert inlets? Are inlet p rot ection devices maintained and functionin q properl ? Ll 71 5. Vehicle tracking Best Management Practices (BMPs) at all site exits? 6. All tracked sediment removed within 24 hours? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Are all infiltration systems staked and marked to avoid com action? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Are all infiltration areas protected with a pretreatment device? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Do all stockpiles have perimeter control? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control BM Ps (Part IV. E.) Comments: Other Yes No NA 1. Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296.6300 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2.36 • 3141!4 Page 2 of 4 CivilSite G R tl tf P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? Yes No I NA 1. Are all previously stabilized areas maintaining 90% ground cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Perimeter Control -Has sediment reached one half the height orthe device? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are inlet p rot ection devices maintained and functionin q properl ? Ll F1 El Comments: Other Yes No NA 1. Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296.6300 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2.36 • 3141!4 Page 2 of 4 CivilSite G R tl tf P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Does on-site fueling only occur in a contained areal L1 n L1 4. Are all solid rrestes being properly disposed of? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the concrete washout area completely contained? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the concrete washout area marked with a sign? Fl I F1 debris, inflow pipes and overfloxv spillways are clear, Inlet areas are clean, Comments: 7. Were any discharges seers during this inspection, sediment, water, or otherwise? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, state the exact location of all points of discharge. Photograph the discharge and describe the discharge (color, odor, foam, oil sheen, etc). How will it be removed? How did the discharge happen? How much was discharged? Ho,r! will it be stopped, and hrnri long mill it take to stop? Is the discharge going into an adjacent site? Was the discharge a secimen t delta? If yes, will the delta be recovered within 7 days? 8. WII a permanent storrrmater management system be udIized in this project as required and in accordance with Part IIID of the permit? Describe: 9. Is any dewatering occurring on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, where? What BMP is being used? Hrnrr much water is being deveatered? Is the water clear? Where is the water being discharged to? 10. Is a copy of the SWPPP located on the construction site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Has the SVVPPP been followed and implemented on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Is a sedimentation basin required for this project as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, are they maintained as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Is the topsoil on this project being preserved? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, explain haw the topsail is being preserved. If not, explain why it was infeasible. 14. Are all infiltration systems marked to avoid compaction? ❑ Yes ❑ No Do all infiltration areas have pretreatment devices? ❑ Yes ❑ No www.pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page 3 of 4 1'"' le G R b tf P 15. Description or areas of non-compliance noted during the inspection, required corrective actions, and recommended date of completion ofcorrective actions 16. Proposed amendments to the SWPPP 17. Potential areas of Future concern. 18. Additional comments, Disclosures: • After ciscovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more exten siv efma re location specific inspection requirements. • The Permittee(s) islare responsible for the inspection and maintenance oftorn porery and permanent water quality management BM P's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control B M P s until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part II.B.5., or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the M PCA. www.pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM �_.i Va Site G R n U P ATTACHMENT C (C R017 0 Ro�e c� 00 o ao 00 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE LAKE W�EST I . All stormlNater retenTion, detention and treatment ha -.ins muse he. inspetLed dl least once a year Lo determine Lhal krasin relenlion and lreaLrnerrl DEVELOPMENT, LLC characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered Inadequate If sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by 50 percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one Vear of the inspersion daTe. 2. All grit Chdrrlbers, sump calch bdsiris, Surrlu manholes, oulleL structures, culverts, outfall structures and other storinwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. 1V'ithin 30 days ofthe inspection date, all accumulated sediment.and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage ureas must he. kept clear of IiTter and t ege.ratia r debris, inflow pipes and overflew spillways kept clear, inlet areas kept clean, and undesirable vegetation removed. Erosion irrlpairing the function or integrity crl Lhe lacilities, if ally, will be corrected, and any structural damage Impairing or threatening to Impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be inspected every three months during the operational period (between spring snn><vmclt and first srlhstantial snowfall) and monitored afrer rainfall eax�nTs of 1 J LO inch or rnpre Lo ensure Thal Ale con LrIbulirig di dindge area is tledr Ul tiller and (y) debris, inflow pipes and overfloxv spillways are clear, Inlet areas are clean, undesirable vegetation is removed and there is no erosion impairing or ^ z threatening to impair the function of a facility. If sediment has accumulated in a infiltration feature, within 30 days of inspection deposited sediments must be Z Y removed, the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils must be restored, and co W Z any surfarc disttrrhanrc must he stahili7(A. InspOrtion must ensure that LO scdimcnt traps and forehays.arra t mothan 50 e tpping sediment and thareLU z 0- O UJ V o 0 z z I o J J 0� W a O > N Lu C) W Lu i- write /a LL r^ VJ percent of the storage volume remains, the contributing drainage area is stable > ti (i.e., no erosion is observed), and inlets and outlet ioverflow. spillways are in OQ L qood conditions with no erosion. (Maintenance techniques used must protect CSO the infiltration capacity of the practice by limiting soil compaction to the M >_ greatest OXTent passible (e.g., by using low impart earth moving equipmenT). (D W 2 'L Urldeigromid Slordge Lharribers rrlust be inspecLed at least once a LID year to ensure that adequate storage capacity remains. Capacity will he Q N LID considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the storage volume by 50 J percent of its aridinal design volume. Accumulated debris and sediment will be w removed, and inlet and outlet structures will be cleared of any flow O impediments, a 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 05 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' 855727 Parcel 67 4501 —E—A S_E_M_E_N_T_ I. THIS INDENTURE, made this day of 1961 ) between Edward A. Nicolaysingle. hereinafter referred to as "Grantor M11, and THE VILLAGE OF ORONO,.a municipal corpora- tionorganized and existing under the Is' of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called Ws "Gran'teell; WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining an easement On land hereinafter described, NOW,. THEREFORE; this indenture,witnesseth, in consideration of OneDollar and .,othe'r. good - and'valuable consideration, paid by the, Grantee to the Grantor(v) the , ,fec'eip,t and sufficiehey.of.which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor(v) hereby ..gian.t(a)..uhto the. Grantee, its successors and assigns' forever, - a. perpetual underground utility -.easement .'.over, under, and across a strip of land described asfoll6ws:. :That part of''Tracts W and X. and accretions theretot Registered Land.Surv6vitles'. - No. 461 files of Registrar of Titles; County o Hennepin,.all in Hennepin County, Minnesota*, lying within 10 feet on.each side of the following -described centerline.- Com- mencing at the most Westerly corner of Lot 185, Taylors.Sub- 'division of Spring 1Southeasterly Park Lots; thence Nort'heasterly.along the. U .So theasterly:line of . said*Tra6t W'a'distance-of 92.feet'to' ppint,'.of.beginning of the center line being desdrib.adt..thence deflecting 16ft..44014 1, a distance of 86 feet;'. thence_ deiflectin 9* left `36042f:a, distance of 253 feet;.thence,-deflecting:ri.iht'- 21029I.a*distance of -86 f"t` thence deflecting left 71049 to the - shore '.of Lake Minnetonka, and there.ending. incl uding,,but,notby way of,.limitation a full and free right and authorit y. to enter upon 9 n piid,jand to install, maintain, operate and. repair a -1d.Et'. sanitary 'sewer'ifit6rceptor, sanitary sewer.main or line, and any.and.all ��,:appurcenances.iiicide'n'tal,and related thereto,' (such are hereafter'*collectively referred Improve ent);:an to -sa Improvement, . and the Granitee d '-join'c6niiections*to id shalf. have the'rightto make au-ch,�usd*of said land4is is.reasonably necessary and advis- cbn"siruction,;iiistallation,.triaintenahce, operation -and repair of:the By accept*ance of this easement and in consideration there*for,.the Grantee for.iiseli.-ind'.iti successors and assigns covenants and agrees to re e store the surface of gjcound..'.d'fsaid, land,where S'uch:is physically possible.and practical, to approx- Amately-the. s ame . condition ' th. at.e.xisIted. .prior to.any construction- .in tallation main- tenance or'.-repaii.bf the-Improvement.within a reasonable time thereafter unless weather or. circum stances.-bo-yondGran ' tee's control do not permit. The Grantor W hereby, covenant(s),for himself and his successors, heirs'and assigns, . to refrain from performing any -act on or constructing or erecting any fixture or improvement on said land that would interfere with Grantee's right of construction, installation, operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written above-.' In the Presence.oi: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN} TRANSFER* ENTERED ROBERT F. FITZSIMMONS, ABBITOR P ' OUNTY,.MINN.. EPU-a 1.92 Certificate of Title No. 370960 862192 _E A S_E M E N_T_ THIS INDENTURE, made this / %' ;4: day of Edward A. Nicolay, unmarried, Parcel 67 Revised 483' October 1966 , between hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)", and THE VILLAGE OF ORONO, a municipal corpora- tion organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "Grantee"; WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining an easement on land hereinafter described, NOW, THEREFORE, this indenture witnesseth, in consideration of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, paid by the Grantee to the Grantor W , the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor W hereby grant(s) unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual underground utility easement over, under, and across a strip of land described as_6_1_1ows: X bPf That_part_of.Tracts W and X,�and accretlons th% eto,)Registered Land Survey No. 461_,/files of Registrar of Titles, County of M' s t Cl in within 10 feet Hennepin, all in Hennepin oun y, inne o a, y g on each side of the following -described centerline: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of Lot 185, Taylors Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said Tract W a distance of 52.4 feet to the point of be- ginning of the centerline being described; thence deflecting left 39030' a distance of 17.8 feet; thence deflecting right 100 25' a distance of 100 feet; thence deflecting left 53051' a distance of 253 feet; thence deflecting right 21029' a distance of 86 feet; thence deflecting left 71049' to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and there ending. including, but not by way of limitation a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct, install, maintain, operate and repair a.sass3taa�c -�•�' i;f« ctatioa, sanitary sewer interceptor, sanitary sewer main or line, and any and all appurtenances incidental and related thereto, (such are hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvement), and to join connections to said Improvement, and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and advis- able to the construction, installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the Improvement. By acceptance of this easement and in consideration therefor, the Grantee for itself and its successors and assigns covenants and agrees to restore the surface of the ground of said land where such is physically possible and practical, to approx- imately the same condition that existed prior to any construction, installation, main- tenance or repair of the Improvement within a reasonable time thereafter unless weather or circumstances beyond Grantee's control do not permit. The Grantor(a) hereby covenant(s) for himself and his successors, heirs and assigns, to refrain from performing any act on or constructing or erecting any fixture or improvement on said land that would interfere with Grantee's right of construction, installation, operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written above: In the presence of: 42 Z. E w rd A. Nicolay-_.__ STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this 2:f day of October, 1966, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Edward A Nicolay, unmarried, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public ROBERT W. MANN Notary Public, Hennepin County, Mink My Commission Expires May 18, 1973 862192 OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF TITLES STATE OF Nili`:PIESOTA COU7iTY OF HEONZPIN t hereby ccrli f y that the V.:4in instrument was filsd in this office on the 9. day e? NOV A. D. 1966 at 'i5o'c(ocI /vl. aI A ;OF TITLES By. D-S�TyT EGIST ^R OF TITLES i O75�; J�) ROBFFT F. FI't7P90ta3, GIIl�I:�Ii N�NNEPIN COU'lTY, MINK. Y I��' T �DEFUT.t'• DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: RENDER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3440 FEDERAL DRIVE, SUITE 110 EAGAN, MN 55122 651-452-5051 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6160 CARMEN AVE E INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55076 763-433-9175 ORONO, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR0 : CITY RESUBMITTAL EQ SITE LOCATION MAP'j MASTER LEGEND: EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 41.26 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS ------ 0— EOF=1135.52 B-1 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL DRAINAGE ARROW EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) Spring Park �r C� 0 1. a k,' -wind 5 Yacht 09 Span Condos Peficnn Poem Goose !stand EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT Sharel�ne Dr — _ - Spray !Mand Lyric Ave. p � � � � ��elS�Qps e • f � i5 Shbrellne Ur tJ `G 7 S a r 4Fd°ae Rd PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE v EXISTING STOPBOX ►t EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX SITE LOCATION EXISTING LIGHT 0 EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE SHEET INDEX iPHER STATE ONE CALL VWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Q Mancheslpr Rd C0.0 r- Comberland Rd SITE SURVEY C0.2 Dona)[1d Ha-mtu�i itd PRELIMINARY REMOVALS C2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE t PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN s PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY DETAILS P PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Tuxedo flO IS- '�Xeda Blvd PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS Aherd&en Rd e Hanover Rd PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS Island Vie SITE LOCATION MAP'j MASTER LEGEND: EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 41.26 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS ------ 0— EOF=1135.52 B-1 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL DRAINAGE ARROW EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) Spring Park �r C� 0 1. a k,' -wind 5 Yacht 09 Span Condos Peficnn Poem Goose !stand EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT Sharel�ne Dr — _ - Spray !Mand Lyric Ave. p � � � � ��elS�Qps e • f � i5 Shbrellne Ur tJ `G 7 S a r 4Fd°ae Rd PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE v EXISTING STOPBOX ►t EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX SITE LOCATION EXISTING LIGHT 0 EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE SHEET INDEX iPHER STATE ONE CALL VWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET CO.1 SITE SURVEY C0.2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1.0 PRELIMINARY REMOVALS C2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C3.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C3.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY DETAILS C6.0 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SW1.0 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS �017 Ho Ro�e (C Cm m CD M 1P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE VIS DEVELOPMENT, LLC I— U W O IY a T— rn M L0 L0 z 73 O O LuU ^Q I`.}L 0/� \Y M V Lo J M J Ln .. z z W z 0 Lu az O z J :E W Q0 Q0N LLI W CO u Vn W = LO QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 TITLE SHEET Como (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 329•'% contour �=110 Found Spike --- _----- t Tree Inventory Survey for: WEST DEVELOPMENT LEGEND 6\ 1a ��JQ^ 0 Iron Monument Found S —Sanitary Sewer i - �,, Y'i —w— Watermain 2 Pru x Spruce . r'.y " , ` 04- Hyd.-6Hydrant /4pfar p lar t,, r GV • Gate Valve a 931. ` po to MHO Manhole M . ` 926.I/ * 5 V Spruce paw r E"r ' CGo Cleanout { $ x r, Inv. Invert Elevation 9 j{ �'/ " 4} ," PP -O- Power Pale l ifa f „y,Fj + - , Concrete Surface 10 x 1a Bituminous Surface 1 I ®Boulder Wall 1±EMRAr r "/ "� —G—Buried Gas Most westerly corner of Lot 'O H 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ---- - -• l�("�' \ OF SPRING PARK LOTS `r add ` Most southerly comer of Lot�I>exs 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----........ • •... OF SPRING PARK LOTS aoc r � 6 01 r "'� � rl +• 1 4 + r , 1 !!d �✓d�1 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SITE SURVEY D 1� 30 90 cafe' in e 1 " = 40'-0" 20'-0" 0 40'-0" COO NOTES * Bearings shown are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. * Contact Gopher State 1 for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Areas: Total = 94,080± square feet (2.16± acres). Lot 1 = 33,170± square feet (0.76± acre). Lot 2 = 29,960± square feet (0.69± acre). Lot 3 = 30,450± square feet (0.71± acre). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition. Tog # DOH Species 961 7" Boxelder 1005 6" Boxelder 962 9" Boxelder 1006 6" Boxefder 919 8" Boxelder 963 10" Boxelder 1007 8"/18" Boxefder 920 6" Boxelder 964 6" Boxelder 1008 6"/8" Boxelder 921 8" Boxelder 965 7" Boxelder 1009 6" Boxelder 922 7" Boxelder 966 9" Boxelder 1010 3-9" Boxefder 923 6" Boxelder 967 2-8"Soxefder 1011 9" Boxelder 924 7" Boxelder 968 2-8"6oxefder 1012 9"/10" Boxelder 925 6" Boxelder 969 7" Elm 1013 8" Boxelder 926 9" Boxelder 970 6"/8"Boxelder 1014 8" Boxefder 927 10" Boxefder 971 6" Boxelder 1015 8" Boxefder 928 8" Boxelder 972 7" Boxefder 1016 9" Saxelder 929 7" Boxefder 973 6"/8" Boxelder 1017 6" Boxefder 930 7" Boxelder 974 6"/7" Boxelder 1018 r Boxefder 931 11" Boxelder 975 7" Boxefder 1019 12" Boxelder 932 14" Boxefder 976 6" Elm 1020 7" Boxelder 933 9 Boxelder 977 10" Boxelder 1021 6" Boxefder 934 10" Boxelder 978 8" Boxefder 1022 7" Boxefder 935 10" Boxefder 979 6"/8" Boxelder 1023 9" Boxelder 936 10" Boxelder 980 6"/8" Elm 1024 7" Boxelder 937 21" Boxefder 981 6" Boxelder 1025 22" Boxelder 938 19" Boxelder 982 6" Boxefder 1026 9" Boxelder 939 19" Boxefder 983 7" Boxefder 1027 7"/8" Boxelder 940 15" Boxelder 984 6" Boxelder 1028 7"/8" Boxelder 941 8" Boxelder 985 11"/11" Boxelder 1029 3-9" Boxelder 942 18" Boxelder 986 6" Boxefder 1030 6"/8" Boxelder 943 18" Boxelder 987 6'/7' Boxelder 1031 6" Boxelder 944 16' Soxeider 988 7"18" Boxelder 1032 8" Elm 945 12" Boxelder 989 8" Boxefder 1033 9" Elm 946 9" Boxelder 990 12" $oxelder 1034 10" Basswood 947 11" Boxefder 991 10" Boxelder 1035 11" Boxelder 948 15" Boxefder 992 8" Boxefder 1036 11" Elm 949 16" Boxefder 993 16" Boxelder 1037 10" Elm 950 11" Boxelder 994 7" Boxelder 1038 9" Boxefder 951 16" Boxelder 995 10" Boxelder 1039 6" Boxefder 952 12" Boxelder 996 10" Boxelder 1040 7" Boxefder 953 15" Boxefder 997 9" Boxelder 1041 7' Elm 954 14" Boxelder 998 8"/10" Boxelder 1042 6' Boxeider 955 21" Boxefder 999 9" Boxelder 1043 7" Mople 956 8" Boxelder 1000 8" Boxefder 1044 13" Elm 957 6" Boxelder 1001 7" Boxelder 1045 7" Boxefder 958 6" Boxelder 1002 8" Boxefder 1046 7 "Boxefder 959 7" Boxelder 1003 6" Boxefder 1047 8 "Boxelder 960 9" Boxelder 1004 6"/6" Boxelder I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 1st day of December, 2016 RENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LANG? SURVEYORS 3440 Federo! Drive • Suite 110 - Eagon, Mlnnesoto - Phone (651) 452-505'1 JOB: 164-2955.010 / Found Spike ----L- ' A Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS V � I / 01 ' 0 �C / '�O / / / G Floor P / 01 / °°O < �2 o � 011 � v o m ZONING NOTES: EXISTING ZONING: AG PROPOSED ZONING: P.U.D. / R2 SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE OC�017HO \\\ Om m O M IP, 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC I— U Lu O d co L0 0 0 0 LUU a 0 0 M V LO J Cy') J LO ., z z Y W z 2 0 a'z 0 z J 2E W >N N W w Cl) W a W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 �G 1 11 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY PLAT C0.2 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS Ire 929.4 con r 000 �� \ �aB ag h ;2k7 0 8 7 6 0i, 4446 FILL EXISTING WETLAND B, 7': \ COORDINATE WITH MINNEHAHA�-9 ` 7 ° z 3 CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT r I ' 2 w AND CITY OF ORONO, PRIOR TO 1� 7 3 ��\ \ CONSTRUCTION v'9 N ` H To, 9 "\ In v. ' g S' S con to `\ \ \� �\ Inv. 9 ' u� \ 04\ �X �. \ \ ' Jam' 8 ♦ \� 7 // / / l/ 7 02 0 \X ` 41%.6 / 1 ' \ 9319 9 O n \ ' ` ♦ REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP. 6049. v ' 5 1 8% ' 0 \� 41v* 1141. 30� r,9 \ i 7� 14b.9 \ 28 147 11 009 29♦♦`\\ C�i 6 1 ��r 2 `\ �1 0 GRADING LIMITS x'X REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP 40 ` � 'MH� Top 931.06 ' Inds 926.36 r � ` r _ \� EXISTING DOCK TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED @ ADJACENT 031 ♦�� `\, '1% PROPERTY OWNER'S DIRECTION. qo PROTECT FROM DAMAGE 13 17 j�l �♦ � ''� �� 47 1819 ♦ ♦ \\ 22 $ A,.,- e7744444.rrrr��r�"��''�� 03433 35 237� r� 24 REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS 6' �9 :SHRUBS AND UNDERGROWTH 4 44 THROUGHOUT SITE, TYP. 26 5 \ r \ \ 7 6 \ � � 4 d %'Z c EXISTING DOCK & BOATLIFT TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED @ i rOp ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S I I ' Inv. 92` DIRECTION. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE 1, ^� . .4 s Q X -------------- �MPORARY BOA 7L/F' ®------------- .00 Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 A Found Spike ri iCl�l43 --_�Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------- 41 X1p46 .7I �r \ 0/ 4 ���x/� / 0/ 0.-/ # EXISTING FENCE . TO BE REMOVED " i r0 G pru , o pruce, spruce <'' 19001i r �O r r /r i r G Floor GP / / 0 / ,!yah/ Hyd. - \ Most westerly corner of Lot \s' / \ �o . MH -----"- \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --- OF SPRING PARK LOTS ty �o Most southerly corner of Lot ,b 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ 01 OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O \�O ` �1 PROTECT TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, SUPPLY TREE FENCING BUT KEEP ON SITE UNLESS ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDES APPROVAL 76! REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. CITY OF ORONO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. EXTENT OF REMOVAL AT CONNECTION TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHOULD BE COORDINATED IN THE FIELD WITH THE CITY AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR MECHANICAL WEEDER. b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCKTHORN) - REMOVE BY HAND, ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY WITH HERBICIDE. 3. NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY. 4. ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS, DEPENDING ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. 5. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORK TO FALL AND LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT. 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BY A TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR. REMOVALS LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- F, - ===_ i X EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC I- U w O d co In L0 G O O O LUU a 0 0 CO M LO J Cy') Lo J Lo z z Y W z 2 ° 0- Uj z O z J 2E W L0 N N W Lu C W a _V W = Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY REMOVALS PLAN C1 ■ 0 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS -----929.4 co` 10 shote i \ �I \ I � `\ \ STAMPED CONCRETE \ PATIO, COORD. STYLE E COLOR w/ OWNER PRIOF `\ TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP GRADING LIMITS , STAMPED COf � \OOH \ s MOTOR COUP FIELD STONE PAVERS. COORD. COLOR, STYLE AND MATERIAL w/ LANDSCAPE ARCH., SAMPLES REQUIRED, TYP. PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION, COORDINATE \ e WI ARCH AND OWNER \ II � � ■ Il r• 's r 1' r r 1 / 1 Found Spike ----1 4444 V Most westerly corner of Lot \ / 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS O� v�9 12' WIDE SAND BEACH, TYP. 076 PROPOSED HOUSE PAD, 0 O COORD. w/ FINAL DESIGN FROM v ARCH., TYP.;ZP�CQ \� 9 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE� 12' WIDE SAND BEACH, TYP. CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. 2. THE CONDITION OF IVY PLACE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND THE EXISTING CONDITION SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED WITH PICTURES. AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK, THE STREET SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR DAMAGE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY SITE WORK. .0-6 . Pop/ r r � .0, o�GJ 114,1 (0 12' WIDE BITUMINOUS r DRIVEWAY r eO r' / F / GFloor Floor GP / / / 3,. spruce '•,�y r WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF / PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 PROPOSED LOT 2 / 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% / 18,109 SF 19.2% BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0%4,653 / 7,296 5F 12.3/❑ 0 5F 0.0% 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent / LY / 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% p r WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. O O O 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 PROPOSED LOT 2 0UTLOTA 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL (LOT 1 +LOT 2 +OUTLOTA) 18,109 SF 19.2% BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0%4,653 5F 16.0% 7,296 5F 12.3/❑ 0 5F 0.0% 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner LY ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% p ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 22,827 SF 78.4% 50,243 SF 84.8% 2,901 SF 50.6% a TOTAL SITE AREA 94,080 SF 100.0% 29,103 SF 100.0% 59,239 SF 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CON DITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CON DITION LOT 2 8,996 SF 9.6% OUTLOT A 2,837 SF 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL (LOT 1 +LOT 2 +OUTLOTA) 18,109 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 14,970 SF 15.9% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE a7 co LO 2 O O U a O O CO M LO J co ..z z Y LLI z 2 ° a UJ O z J 2E L LJ N L LI Lu C ~ L LI a (D L LI z Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 5,738 SF 100.0% SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C2 ■ 01 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. /--929.4 contour ------------- i \ `% h /% -y � O O \ ♦ \ \ `♦ \ ` \ `♦ DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT \ ♦♦ PER DOCUMENT NO. T5010662 \ \ \\ `� 4/%0 i Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot J 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS 0(C�OVHO Rhe C� m O M IP, 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 5 `\% 041\ W � A V � � Q JFound 1/2" Iron Pipe \ / '°-t a / � � G / / J5 4/b rfl, / / I /00 00 EASEMENT AREAS: DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT SUMMARY TOTAL EASEMENTAREA 8500 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN 0 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN (temporary, annually) 284 [sf] SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE U LLI O co LO LO O O LUU a 0 0 M V LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z z Y W z 2 o a Uj 0 z J 2E W L6 N N W Lu Cl) W a (D W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY \ EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.1 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' /000, 4 con t` i / � � \\ \ ` �♦�.-• 'Shote J O7 6 \ I \ \ \ \ \\\``♦ �(/ 19 VACATE EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT \� / \\ `♦ I I 1 I \ I \ \ ♦` I� I ♦ ROADWAY EASEMENT TO REMAIN (C �ov H S Rohe Cm m O M 1P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC \♦ LU Q Found 1/2" Iron Pipe O:6 a / / / 00071, ol /"C < p / 3" �I � % � �� spruce P or / 1 ; I / // Poplar � / I �0 I /I � / X/ G Floor / � o ` Most westerly corner of Lot \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ -- ..... ............ - OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ -Po \ F Most southerly corner of Lot ,b 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - 01 OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O lad \ 20 \�O ` �1 SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE U W 0 d rn co In L0 O 0 0 LUU a 0 0 co M V LO J � J LO ., z z Y W z 2 0 a W O z J 2i W v' coN Ww C W a W 2 QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL —�J WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG i (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE \ ��\ (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 �G 1 11 1 1 1 1 PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.2 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' /000, 4 con t` i /� � \\\ `���•'� `Shote ♦ R017 OR Ro�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC �\% LU \A U � Q J Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------/ , o:6 a Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS EASEMENT AREAS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT SUMMARY (based on proposed/reaffrpned easement condition) TOTAL EASEMENTAREA / / AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN EASEMENT AREAS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT SUMMARY (based on proposed/reaffrpned easement condition) TOTAL EASEMENTAREA 9714 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT WITHIN (including existing pavement from 196 [sf] adjacent property) OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN f 200 [sf] (temporary, annually) SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 U Lu O a co In L0 2 O 0 LUU a 0 0 co M V LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z z Y W z 2 ° a Uj 0 z J 2E W Ln >N N W Lu Cn W a (D W 2 QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.3 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' / V �, o \ �\ FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION ` l� EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE \ \ \ WETLAND A, TYP. II %%\\ ase \\ �-� l� I O� I ;I I �I I� l i ♦tx / Most westerly corner of Lot \\ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ ----- OF "OF SPRING PARK LOTS v�9 FLOWAGE AND CONSERVFON EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE ►` WETLAND A, TYP. 9� \ 'A% % \ %% Found 1/2" Iron Pipe--------/' _ Flo / 00071, G i do - / SITE PLAN LEGEND: / - - PROPERTY LINE / SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Illlllllli Illlllllli � 1 1 1 1 R017 0 0 Ro�e a o 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U Lu O a co In L0 O 0 0 LdU a 0 0 co M V LO J Cy') J LO z z Y W z 2 0 a LUJ 0 z J 2E W Ln N N W Lu Cl) W a (D W 2 Lo QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C2.4 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS 29.91 �MAZC`H 29.65 29.66 7C M H '0■ `��vIATCH 0 as i" I�i __ _ /'�, �• li��j ' - 6� \�\ ♦` 29.12 MATCH 00 MATCH 29.43 30.38 ,'� `� \ i MATCH MATCH /!��` 'i ♦ --Q 29.49 MATCH r \ 930 9,32 1%\ 29.34 O ♦ 3r s \ MATCH 33. 0 ♦ o 29.13 �OJ� �\ \ 34.0. / 9 �. \ MATCH \\ \ ♦♦ `33.00 `�\\\ \ 29.09 3 0 9� ♦ MATCH30.93 !/ MAIC � \ (9 MATCH � � �` � � J 3.50 34.00 34.00 033.00 MATCH `4411,% 13.50 �`�� ® % 31.47 34.00 MA H FFE=934.00 \. 34.00 1% \ �v ,D 33. �% \ �rn 34.00 1 / �` 29.49 31.52 34.00 \�\ MATCH GRADING LIMITS MATCH \� 34.00 ^ 2 � \ � \ �'♦ SB -2 9 e ` 29.53 �\\33.50 33.60 4.00 3j ` �� ♦' MATCH \ 34.0031 77 1 \ \� MATCH 34.00 3 88 ♦ ,� I �\ �\ 1-110 28.92 DO `I ' \ \ 34.00 33.74 .37 / O �� \ MATCH \ \ 33.33 33.33 \ 31.40 / 34.00 34.00 \ MATCH �� ,.004 3.16 and 1/2" Iron Pipe---- `33.24 3 34.00 32.46 / S 4 '-32.29/ FFE=934.00 3 0 \ \ � 33.47 �� , .�i \ 34.00 34.00 / SEE INSET A \ A H, O DRAIN RUNOFF FROM 1. 2 5 1.70 OO 34'�JACENT PROPERTY ) / • ,♦ 'r TOWARD LAKE/LAGOON •00 �vv 6/�THROUGH SWALE, TYP. •7 . H 30.66 1.46 34.00 07� MATCH \ 31.83 .% 32.43 / � \�% MATC ` 0 4 A CHF,�\I� \ ` 31.81 xx , / `` 1 / O �I I � \ ' HP 80 34.20 32.2 32.50 .// MATCH 1 i % 3179 33.01 I� 31.061 , .�• MA I� NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED l MATCI ^� / SITE SHOULD BE DIRECTED / rrIf/ 9 �� TOWARDS THE ADJACENT ATC�I► PROPERTY OWNER 32 MCH ^i i r � 31 Ir CO 32.09 /r '/ 3.3/ / G Floor MATC / ' S�Q r MATCH 24 ATC Found Spike ------_.- 4 Y� �t 0 by !J I Ap / 0) //p" \\f y Most westerly corner of Lot \' �' �0 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -- ��, �\' \ �6' O OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ o �0 L Most southerly corner of Lot cv 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \ O0O \\ 20 INSET A 4" oplar 3" i Ce 932 S 32. MA' EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATED 03-30-2016 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 914.80 TO 925.70 THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB -1 914.80 SB -2 919.10 SB -3 925.70 SB -4 924.90 REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. / 'x31.52 / 32.45 ' MATC 31.7 / / DRAIN UNOFF F OM ADJ ENT PR ERTY/yam"32.51 TO ARD LA LAG00 y`L/ MATCH ROUG WALE, XP. //32.55 32.07 MATCH' / 32.43 / 2.7 /r\TCH ` 33.80 // `32.63 HP 9335 MATCH NO RUNOFF FROM THE SED SITE SHOULD BE D TED TOWARDS THE r U C & ADJAC ROPERTY OWNER 34.20 MATCH M / i 65 6 / JMATCH I a r 33.01% MATCH » Poplar GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. .2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 881.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=891.00 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A ' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \ 1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE YY (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" (C R017 0 Ro�e cm G\ o U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C300 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. V LO J Cy') J LO Ln Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z aUj V o p z Q O J 2E J 0� O W i L N a Ili W w Q J 0- U) C O C:) M LU >Q> 3: z: (D W z Ln Q14 Lf)L0 J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C300 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot :>K 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ...... ----"'- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: EXISTING FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR EXISTING VOLUME=1,158CY of 50.93 BATCH i 1 31.77 MATCH `O341' 146 OF MATCH, •4v \ MATT \� MATCF♦\� \ �d G 31.06' MATCH �kh i / MCH L r% 32.09 A.2 4 NA � \ Hyd Most westerly corner of Lot 3 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -------- v OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED VOLUME=1,449CY 2 34.00 \ 00 FFE=934.00 34.00 ►�i Y, 00Rou\ \\\ 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 34.00 O 83 OOO 34.00 .07� , CO / M f 32.43 C \ 31.81 9� 4.00 I ATCHF�� � 1 ♦ gP I 33. 0 HP �'i 34.20 �s 32.24 32.50 ,♦ MATCH 31 7Z I - � 33.01 I ,♦ MATCH U JI ,G w o ATCH 0 31 i i i i 33.3 � G Floor G \ FLOODPLAIN LEGEND: E�= FLOODPLAIN - EXISTING & PROPOSED GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL co Lf) L0 G O 0 0 LUU a O C) (. M 0 LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z Z Y W z 2 0 0. ui O z J 2E W N W Lu Cl) ~ W a r_n _V W 2 QC14 Lf) J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C301 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. �� 4.00 33.60 -V � 34.00 34.00 O 34.00 33.74 37 33.33 03.33 31.40 �33 3.16 MATCH ` N X33.24 �� 12.46 �\ 32.29 �� `O341' 146 OF MATCH, •4v \ MATT \� MATCF♦\� \ �d G 31.06' MATCH �kh i / MCH L r% 32.09 A.2 4 NA � \ Hyd Most westerly corner of Lot 3 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -------- v OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BELOW THE 931.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED VOLUME=1,449CY 2 34.00 \ 00 FFE=934.00 34.00 ►�i Y, 00Rou\ \\\ 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 34.00 O 83 OOO 34.00 .07� , CO / M f 32.43 C \ 31.81 9� 4.00 I ATCHF�� � 1 ♦ gP I 33. 0 HP �'i 34.20 �s 32.24 32.50 ,♦ MATCH 31 7Z I - � 33.01 I ,♦ MATCH U JI ,G w o ATCH 0 31 i i i i 33.3 � G Floor G \ FLOODPLAIN LEGEND: E�= FLOODPLAIN - EXISTING & PROPOSED GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE OW (651) 454-0002 LOCAL co Lf) L0 G O 0 0 LUU a O C) (. M 0 LO J Cy') J LO LO ., z Z Y W z 2 0 0. ui O z J 2E W N W Lu Cl) ~ W a r_n _V W 2 QC14 Lf) J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C301 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS .• 29.91 �h1+41H �••---929.4 29.65 29.66 MATCH �. w ■ ■. \�gTCH / ♦\ 29.12 MATCH DELINEATED WETLAND "A29.69 . ?,, ♦�% 3038 MATCH S c�0 / O- / 0 931 t w 932 ♦ `_..g318 oor, �X \ \ 33. 0 34.0 ♦ \ 3 �� 30 93 \ M T i 3.5\0 34.00 34 3 27 -4 TCH � \ -'33. 0 .5' 1.47 \ 34.00 \ F ,,-29.43 MATCH /O 29.49 MATCH -9T DELINEATED WETLAND "B" -Oji 9 (TO BE FILLED) v 29.34 MATCH DELINEATED WETLAND (TO BE FILLED) s 29.13 �6/ !/ MATCH 6 937 \\ O 29.09 MATCH )0 X 0 9�� E=934.00 \ DELINEATED WETLAND "A" 34.00 \ 9�� (TO BE FILLED) 9 ` 33. ♦� 34.00 29.49 1.52 34.00 ' ♦ \ \ MATCH GRADING LIMITS TCH 34.00 \ .21 29.53 33.60 34.00 937 ♦`� MATCH � 34.00 � 5g� � .� ♦ 31.77 34.00 ^h 3 88 \ ATCH / nO 28.92 MATCH `% 0� \ 34.00 33.74 .37 5C 'p `% : / 33.3) 33 ♦ �3�33 � %% 1.40 TCH 933 4 3.16 34.00 34.00 rnM 6 `33 34.00 �` . 32.46 � \ i\ '-32.29/ / FFE=934.00 ♦ 0 . / 33,47 0.3 34.00 34.00N.� ATC OO DRAIN RUNOFF FROM 31. 2 .�♦ 1.70 OO\ 34'JACENT PROPERTY3 .00 ♦ TOWARD LAKE/LAGOON �`L �� •/ `\\` . 5G � ♦ OOH THROUGH SWALE, TYP. '7 . ♦ H(I • � �� 10 1 46 X 34.00♦♦ ��� 5 M 'T H 31.83 32.43 / "� ♦ �5 / ♦ AT 31.81 3 4.00///A 9TCHF,'� `� ♦ 0 / 1 1 33.80 HP 34.20 / 31 79 32.2 132.50 / .♦♦ MATCH / 29.0' � `- ♦ 33.01 . ♦ 1 . 1 i ./ MATCH NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED di SITE SHOULD BE DIRECTED i9 TOWARDS THE ADJACENT ATCH PROPERTY OWNER !✓ i o ' M1 32 I 1 i � � 31 )� � O 32.09 Floor 32.24 � �`S�QG / MATCH GP / A / '4 ' Found Spike ...... � 444\ i i \ Hyd. / \ Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- "- OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot � � \- 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ / OF SPRING PARK LOTS 7O WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS TABLE: WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BUFFER WIDTH MINIMUM 12.5 LF MAXIMUM 50 LF AVERAGE 25 LF BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS: BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS LENGTH OF WETLAN D A WITH LESS THAN 69 LF 12.5' BUFFER WIDTH AREA OF WETLAND A BUFFER NOT 1725 SF PROVIDED FOR 69' LENGTH (25' BUFFER) PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS TABLE: WETLAND AREA TABLE 9,871 SF TOTAL WETLANDA (ON SITE) 9,546 SF UNDISTURBED 325 SF FILLED WETLAND B 168 SF FILLED WETLAND/BUFFER MITIGATION TABLE: WETLAND MITIGATION TOTAL PROPOSED FILL AREA (WTLNDs A&B) REQUIRED MITIGATION - 2:1 ON-SITE PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION AREA: (MITIGATION TO OCCUR OFFSITE) BUFFER INFORMATION EXISTING PERIMETER OF WETLAND A PROPOSED PERIMETER OF WETLAND A REQUIRED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA: PROVIDED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA LEGEND 493 SF 986 SF 0 SF 994 LF 970 LF 24,250 SF 25,594 SF WETLAND BUFFER - MnDOT SEED MIX 34-262 WET PRAIRIE. SPREAD AT 14.5 LBS/ACRE AND PER MnDOT SEEDING MANUAL. WETLAND MONUMENT SIGN - COORDINATE TYPE AND SPACING WITH MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A ' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \ 1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE YY (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" (CRO17HO O N__��) GO O M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA . I DEVELOPMENT, LLC U J Lu O d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C302 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. V LO J Cy') J LO Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z 0. Ujz V o0 Q O J J � O W i L N a LU W w >m Q J 0 U) V♦ O C:) M LU >Q> 3: Z: (D W 2 In Q14 InL0 U J Lu O d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C302 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GRADING LIMITS /,---- Jr_ 929.4 co` `` ftb 10 N"N i /i UNDERGROUND STORMWATER \ DETENTION SYSTEM 2 \ 12" PERF. CMP \ (2) HEADERS \ 12" SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION I\ �' 6" STONE COVER FOOTPRINT=17.0'x64.0' IE 12" CMP=930.00 /V \ OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 < MH Top *24 OE 6" ORIFICE=930.40 In v. 921.2�� c OE 6" ORIFICE=930.50 +' TOP 12" CMP=931.00 TOP STONE=931.50 100 -YR HWL=931.38 «l, GRADING LIMITS GUTTER REAR HALF OF HOUSES TO AREA DRAIN AND PIPE INTO UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, TYP. COORD. LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS W/ ARCH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE ON ALL PVC CONNECTIONS TO (UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS � CONNECT TO EXISTIN� SANITARY STUB CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ` \ LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING( \\ ; SANITARY SERVICE. REP( , FINDINGS TO ENGINEER %\ 922LF 2" PVC STORM @ 1.05% 'OQ 22LF 6"x2 PVC \ �:O STORM @ 3.32%, ' O 2.86% � 0 �\ \n STUB 21VAT v / SERVICE TO WI IN 5' O 29LF 2" PVC H FROM HC�kJSE QO STORM @ 0.79% / Top 931.06 �T � Inds 926.36 r- %\ %\ r `` q2 ar \ ♦ / \ \' \% \ \ r \ l� i 1 � op 9A Inv. 9' 's I . r 1' ♦ ,� / WET TAP (2) SERVICES TO EXISTING WATER ' STUB. COORDINATE W/ r / CITY i v�9 _O l/ \\ O (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. (�5 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLG(V)T9 INFLOW, TYP. ;zp9 4 54LF 10" PVC STORM @ 0.50% l \ / 4rJ HDPE FES 1 I E=±929.50 RIPRAP TO NWL INSTALL NON -RETURN VALVE-T`O DISALLOW LAKE/FLOOD WATER FROM ENTERING SYSTEM. INSTALL CONCRETE HEADWALL AND v \ DENT GUARD PER MANUF. SPECS. PROVIDE CLAY LINER / / \ BENEATH AND ON SIDES \ OFUNDERGROUND /- NYLOPLAST MH 1 \ FILTRATION SYSTEMS, TYP. RI M=932.00 I E=929.77 29LF 4"x2 PVC STORM @ 1.66% (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLOW INFLOW, TYP. UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM 1 12" PERF. CMP Found n d 1 2'� I r0 (� HEADERS 1 SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION 6" STONE COVER / STUB 2" WATER �� / �h .� FOOTPRINT=11.0'x64.0' SERVICE TO WITHIN 5' IE 12" CMP -930.00 FROM HOUSE / .�/ OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 OE (x2) 4" ORIFICE=930.25 TOP 12" CMP=931.00 / �•/G 1 TOP STONE=931.50 100 -YR HWL=931.47 / �% vN i / ��/ / P / CON 4ECT TO EXISTING s.- SANITARY STUB / 4" P /or CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY / ../, 6 LOCATION, SIZE, AND Poplar ELEVATION OF EXISTING / :/l. SANITARY SERVICE. REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER 2" COPPER WATER / SERVICE. COORDINATE / SIZING W/ MECHANICAL DESIGNING IN HOUSE / SPRINKLER SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 / CON TO VERIFY LOCA N, SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING 1_ / x 4444 �`�' I WATER SERVICE. REPORT Found Spike ,may FINDINGS TO ENGINEER / \ Hyd. \ Most westerly corner Lot MH \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----" ION ----- /s, OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS CITY OF ORONO UTILITY NOTES: 1. TELEVISE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ONCE SANITARY SEWER STUBS ARE EXPOSED AND LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION ARE FIELD VERIFIED, LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF SERVICE CONNECTION SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. GRADING FLOODPLAIN NOTES (CITY & WATERSHED): 1. FILLING IN THE FLOODPLAIN WILL BE MITIGATED ON SITE AT A 1:1 VOLUME RATIO. 2. PER CITY OF ORONO RULES, THE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION (LIFE) OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 932.5 OR HIGHER. 3. PER MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RULES, THE LOW OPENING OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 933.5 OR HIGHER. UTILITY LEGEND: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL CATCH BASIN MANHOLE GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER PVC STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP 4 (C 0 \0\\ Ro\e G3 O M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 0) co U) LID2 O 0 O U a > O CO M LO J co J L0 z z Y W z O a UU 0 z J 2E W `6 N N W LU W a CD W 2 Lo QN J 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C4.0 QCOPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' U) LU o= Q z J d LU_ LU F-- 0- ao 0 J W Z W W LL 0 BUILDING DOWNSPOUT REFER TO ARCH'L EXTEND DOWNSPOUT AND POINT DOWN OVER 6 �I II Compacted Backfill CENTER OF GRATE- BII 8"X8" NYLOPLAST=,1_ = 0 5Bc_ - 2000# Concrete RECTANGULAR, DUCTILE 'I 1111'-1111' "'-"' "' "'I LOAD FACTOR 2.3 /SLOPE TO - .5Bc "Bc" Denotes outside SLOPE TO DRAIN IRON GRATE, OR Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe CLASS A DRAIN APPROVED EQUIVALENT Concrete backfill to 0.5 ~8" of outside diameter with 6, shaped bedding. • TIP =I COMPACTED SOIL ° — 8" GRATE TO 4" PIPE INLINE ° - DRAIN ADAPTER 1=1 I CONCRETE COLLAR ON COMPACTED BACK FILL 4" PVC SEWER RISER PIPE ~12" (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 4" PVC LONG RADIUS 4 BEND SEWER ELBOW 4" PVC SEWER PIPE Jo 0 0 ^o CRUSHED AND COMPACTED STONE DOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTION NTS DIA +3' MATERIAL 1'-6" (MIN) 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL NTS 4" THICK \RD (USE 2-2" MASTIC ALL JOINTS 4TION BOARD DOWN EPTH. 12" III Compacted Backfill T- B c i- -1_ + + ++K�=2+ o. + +I�I- + + Course Filter Aggregate I�I Bc/4 but not'=j_ + + + + + IF, III- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. less than 6" -1 + + + + + + Bc/4 but not' Fess than 6" -I 1' 11' 111-111-1 1 1— 1' LOAD FACTOR 1.9 Bc+12" Min. Bc" Denotes outside CLASS B diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material I I Bc Compacted Backfill _-IIIIIIII_ LOAD FACTOR 1.5 ��07,5�Bc Il'Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C-1 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soil BIIIIII- Compacted Backfill A -I - + a + + +-11111 Course Filter Aggregate + + + + + + —II MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. II-III - LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Be" Denotes outside CLASS C-2 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS -1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1- 12" + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Bc +++++++++ 1_ + I =1 + + + I- ' =1 + + 1= ++ 6" + + + + + + + 1— 11-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I- Min.=Bc+12 "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe Compacted Backfill Granular Borrow (MnDOT Spec. 3149A modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS Compacted - 1I Backfill Ith, x(11= I_I+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I_I 12" Bedding __ + + + + + + BC + + + + + + I- I- �1 + + + + + + + + + + I- =1_ + + + + + + + + + + + =1 + + + + + + + + + + 6" Foundation — / / / / �akyle/ "—III—III—III—III— Course Filter "Bc" Denotes outside Minimum Aga. (MnDot Spec. diameter of pipe 2d+Bc+12" 3149H Modified) PIPE FOUNDATION R BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS CROURO sRote a n C:D M P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE VIS DEVELOPMENT, LLC I- U W O a T—T V/ M L0 L0 5z G O 0 0 LuU Q O O CO M Lo J M J Ln L0 z z W z 20 a LU z Oz J 2 W N W Lu CO 0 ~ C ~ W Q 2 (D W z LO QN In J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY CIVIL DETAILS C5.0 (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GRADING LIMITS /�� Jr_929.4 co` ag h �2k7 ;X$78 6 i � 1 2 3 a7/ 1 ' ' 2 9 6 t 8 ♦ �, '' 7 5 6 ao l� �t 2 3 4E 1147 GRADING LIMITS049 \ \ V4 j[ /C O� I \ � 7 / \ \ \ O76' 0 01 30\ \ r17 A&28 29 023 24 40 \ g25 026 \ ' 9 t, \ .� \\ 6 \♦\ '♦ Xbp35 Found 1/2" Iron Pipe a5 4/r- / G \ ♦ 333 $ 8 .•/ / \ 3,. ./ 3.. \ ♦ 2 0 Spruc pruce 4 l� .. / / `1 Poplar )P tar 5 ..• Poplar / 0 4 3 9 3 / CO / // / • 33.3 / G Floor otx Found Spike- ---------- // X4444 / Most westerly corner of Lot \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ -- ..... ........... OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ / Most southerly corner of Lot � 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ------ - \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS m No , DBH , SPECIES r CONDITION r REMOVED 919 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 920 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 921 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 922 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 923 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 924 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 925 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 926 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 927 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 928 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 929 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 930 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 931 11 BOXELDER POOR YES 932 14 BOXELDER POOR YES 933 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 934 10 BOXELDER POOR YES 935 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 936 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 937 21 BOXELDER FAIR YES 938 19 BOXELDER FAIR YES 939 19 BOXELDER POOR YES 940 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 941 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 942 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 943 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 944 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 945 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES 946 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 947 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES 948 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 949 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 950 11 BOXELDER POOR YES 951 16 BOXELDER POOR YES 952 12 BOXELDER POOR YES 953 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 954 14 BOXELDER FAIR YES 955 21 BOXELDER POOR YES 956 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 957 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 958 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 959 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 960 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 961 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 962 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 963 10 BOXELDER POOR YES 964 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 965 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 966 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 967 2-8 BOXELDER POOR YES 968 2-8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 969 7 ELM FAIR YES 970 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 971 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 972 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 973 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 974 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 975 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 976 6 ELM FAIR YES 977 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 978 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 979 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 980 6/8 ELM POOR YES 981 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 982 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 983 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 984 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 985 11/11 BOXELDER POOR YES 986 6 BOXELDER POOR YES r REMOVALS LEGEND: O IV OR O 987 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YESRS R� 988 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES (m G3 CD U P 989 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 990 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES CivilSiteGroup.com 991 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 992 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 993 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 994 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 995 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 996 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 997 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LAKE W�EST 998 8/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 999 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1000 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1001 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1002 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1003 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1004 6/6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1005 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1006 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1007 8/18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1008 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1009 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1010 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1011 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1012 9/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1013 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1014 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1015 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1016 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1017 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1018 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 1019 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO 1020 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES J � 1021 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES J LO 1022 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES LOz 1023 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1024 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES M Y 1025 22 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1026 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO Z L!7 1027 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES z 1028 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Uj a LL! 1029 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES O z 1030 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Z J 1031 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES Lfi 1032 8 ELM POOR YES O > N 1033 9 ELM FAIR YES a LU$ 1034 10 BASSWOOD POOR YES W LU 1035 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES Q Q — J � 1036 11 ELM FAIR YES 0- (n 1037 10 ELM POOR YES 1038 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES — 1039 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES � W j 1040 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES cY) _> 1041 7 ELM FAIR YES (� 1042 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES W 2 1043 7 MAPLE FAIR YES N 1044 13 ELM FAIR YES LID 1045 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES U J 1046 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES w 1047 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES a EXISTING TREES TOTALTREES 129 FAIR CONDITION 103 REMOVED = 103 SAVED = 0 POOR CONDITION 26 REMOVED = 26 SAVED = 0 TREE REPLANTING EXISTINGTREES REMOVED 129 PROPOSED TREES 94 *SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED TREES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY #'0"' 4 I REVISION SUMMARY � � TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C6 ■ 01 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST PLANT SCHEDULE - TREES 29.4 cont�ou+r!2 _ PCW SYM QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS ftb SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST DECIDUOUS TREES -41 F * * + 1 - HB NRM 18 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM } * * * * * * + SEEDING ZONE C, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST ++++++ ++++ + FFSM 7 FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Bailsta' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM / ++ ,++++ ++ * ++*+++ +++ ♦ 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. PCW 3 PRAIRIE CASCADE WEEPING WILLOW Salix'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++++ + + + + + + +\ ♦ RB 15 RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ++++++++ +++++ + ++ 2-SWO * + + + + + + + PB 5 PAPER BIRCH Betula papyrifera 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++ +++ + +++ + +++++ + + + + + + + + + + +�} ♦ SWO 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM « + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + +* + + + + 4 4 4 4 • 4 + + 2 pg + + + HB 2 HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++ ++ + ++++ + ++ +++ + + + +O C' ri + +*+* +++ ++ + +*+ +++ 4 -RB ORNAMENTAL TREES +*+++ + + a•'• ++++ +� ♦ ABS 5 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + ++++ THH 7 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli 'Inermis' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + +� * + + + + +' + + + O Carpinus caroliniana +,+ +*+*+ +* +*+*+ ':' + +* *+*} } ��� /� BB 5 BLUE BEECH p 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM .... + + + + + + • . • • : • : • + + + + + .. ++ .. ... +++ ++ 2 NRM �+ ++ +++ ++++++++`+ ♦` - -9� * + • O + EVERGREEN TREES + ++++++ ++++++{+++++ * « * * + {' '•'•'� + + + + C/ EVERGREEN BHS 5 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca'Densata' 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM +++++++ + ++*+*+*+*+ ♦ BEACH AREA +++� ++ + + ' ' ' •• ::jy 1 *+* ++++ ��� �j WP 7 WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + + / ++++ + s �% /��/A/ WC 9 WHITE CEDAR Thuja occidentalis 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM + + 4 J 4 + , + + I- �M �O * 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. *+++++++ ++; +++++ +* \ 7 3-FFSM` *} +*}* } + 4 -RB NATIVE SEEDING NOTES &SPECIFICATIONS: �. / \ 1 -RB 1 H + + + +`•,• : '• ♦ SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND",qq A NQL48 1. INSTALL ALL SEED MIXES PER SEED SUPPLIERS INSTRUCTIONS, OR EMPLOY SUPPLIER TO SEED MATERIAL CORRECTLY. *+*+* * +*+' '-•• \ j ++ SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND 1 T ANT 2. PLANTING OF SEED MATERIAL BUT BE ACCOMPANIED BY CONTINUED MAINTENANCE BY THE SEEDING COMPANY UNTIL FULL COVERAGE IS ESTABLISHED SEEDING ZONE C, SEE � «++ ++ + +* � � \\ '�. +++ LEGEND & PLANT LIST ++ + + *i ♦+* + \\ /*+*+ ij 1 �9 ++ �+*+ + + 2 -ABS ++ +++++++ +++++ 1 - SWO * ++++ , *♦ C ( ) ( ) + } + + ++ Oji ZONE PER PLAN A ZONE PER PLAN B + +++++ + \ cc\ + + + + + SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLAI�fi�ST + + *+ ++++++++ 93v'< `\++++++ +♦ MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. SEEDING ZONE B, SEE } + + + + + + \ \ �+ 3 -WC LEGEND & PLANT LIST 1 ++++++ ++ ++ +*+*+ 1 PB `\ \ ++* SEED MIX: SHORELINE WILDFLOWER MIX SEED MIX: POLLINATOR MIX FOR MESIC TO WET SOILS ++++ ++++++ + 2-SWO + + + ++ }*+*+*+*+, 1 - RB \` \ `o`P,` + + + ++++ �' \` BEACH AREA SEED MIX INFORMATION: SEED MIX INFORMATION: + + + + +++++++ + + k, _- �i �+++-+ v v SEEDING ZONE A, SEE *+*+ ++++++++++++�� �� ���� t, -+ + + �" t+ �vv♦ LEGEND & PLANT LIST + + +++r +/+ } + 4 + + 4 + + +++ ++++ rn ++ \ + 2 - FFSM +++ + ++ +*+*+ +*+*+ 1 BB r* />� X ♦♦ } + + ++ ++++ / \+ 3 RB \\\ +**++ - ++++ + ++ ++++++++.. \ 4 B ++ ++++ Soil Type: For that zone one foot higherthan waterelevation down to six inches lowerthan waterelevation Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 2-4ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: Broadcast: 1/2-11b./10, 000 sq. ft. Soil Type: Loam, Clay, Sand Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 3 to 6 ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: 4 ozs. pe r 1,000 sq. ft. + + + + + + + + 9 + + + ++�SEEDING ZONE B, SEE +* +++ + * + + ++' - `37+++++++++*++\ ♦ LEGEND &PLANT LIST GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): 1 -PCW \ + + + + + + a BLUE VERVAIN 15% GRASSES ++++++++' + + BIG BLUESTEM 5.00% \ *+*+*+ +*+*+* + 3 -THH _ / �++ + ++ +++++*+*+* *+`-2-A / ++* SEEDING ZONE A, SWAMP MILKWEED 12% ° \,A+ + + + + ` * * * SEE LEGEND &PLANT JOE-PYE WEED 11% CANADA WILD RYE 4.00% + + + + + + �� %c + + � �% + + + 4 �.� �.,,� A + + } } LIST SWEET FLAG 8% INDIAN GRASS 3.50% �+ + + + ++++++ '�0 \ �� �. �. Ind ++* *+ + +* *+ + / ��� ���� �.*+*+ .*+++ + �,� _ '�«' + + + ; ♦ BONESET 9% BLUEJOINTGRA55 3.25% %�\ ♦ BLACK-EYED SUSAN 6% ° ++++ FRINGED BROME 2.75/° * r +++ ++ r+ + +*++++**+* N r GIANT BUR -REED 6% LITTLE BLUES TEM 1.00% ++++ +*+* *2 -FFSM ♦ ♦ + GOLDEN ALEXANDER 6% SWITCH 0.25% LANDSCAPE NOTES: \+ 2-THH IRONWEED 6% WILDFLOWERS +,+.;,t+++++ + ++ WATER PLANTAIN 4% SWAMP MILKWEED 8.00% *+ + ++ - . FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 3% PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER 8.00% 1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE \ \ *++ *++ 1 - NRM 2 -NRM 0 i \+ ° ° SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER. OWNER'S \*'+* + COMMON OX -EYE 3/° JOE-PYE WEED 7.00% REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. \ ' k O 1 -THH + MEADOW BLAZING STAR 3% MEADOW BLAZING STAR 7.00% EDGING SHALL BE METAL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. ♦ \ \ O + 3 -WC TALL BLAZING STAR 2% TALL BLZING STAR 7.00% ♦ \ -: «+ + WP ARROWHEAD 2% BLUE VERVAIN 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD L * `� SA ° 7.00% MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING `♦ „ OO 1 - THH 1 PB :+++ MEADOW ROSE 1% GOLDEN ALEXANDER 6.25% BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A S O � }* 0 PAN ICLED ASTER 1% BON ESET 5.00% MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. O �5� RED -STALKED ASTER 1% COMMON OX -EYE 5.00% 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN 2 - RB \ ` �d / TALL MEADOW RUE 1% BLACK-EYED SUSAN 5.00% ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF \ ; ' / �� � 100% FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 3.00% HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND\ ♦ \ \\ 2 STIFF GOLDENROD 3.00% DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ♦ % ��. IRONWEED 3.00 *.y A PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE \` \ I + e ('0 ° PERIOD. ` ,';+� Bruce cy / WILD BERGAMOT 2.00% l� ;''+*+ ' YARROW 1.00% + 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY ++, P YARROW / ZONE(PER PLAN): C OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY 1 i ++ + CANADA MILK VETCH 1.00% VC SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. I 1 I In'+ + 1 - ABS / PAN ICLED ASTER 1.00% 1 MANUFACTURER: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. RE -STALKED ASTER 1.00% 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE I� WP SEED MIX: NORTHERN WET MEADOW WILDFLOWER MIX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE + / 100.00% CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT % I ,+ * SEED MIX INFORMATION: SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 9. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. a 11 -NRM 33.3.. x / r' � Floc, Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 cp i Found Spike --------- 4 10. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. H Most westerly corner Lot \�f \ MH \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION-------�--"'� � / 6,, , OF SPRING PARK LOTS �0 CITY OF ORONO LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACING BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES AND ANY UTILITY SERVICE THAT IS PROPOSED OR EXISTING AND TO REMAIN. Most southerly corner of Lot.b 01 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -- OF SPRING PARK LOTS �\ O0O \ CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR MECHANICAL WEEDER. b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCKTHORN) - REMOVE BY HAND, ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY WITH HERBICIDE. 3. NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY. 4. ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS, DEPENDING ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. 5. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORK TO FALL AND LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT. 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BY A TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR. Soil Type: Ideal forsites in the North Northeast part of the state Soil Moisture: Mesic-Wet Average Height: 3-6ft. Sun Exposure: FulIto partial sun Seeding Rate: Broadcast:) -2 oz./1,000 sq. ft. GENERAL COMPOSITION (BY PLS WEIGHT): BLUE VERVAIN 13% SWAMP MILKWEED 12% JOE-PYE WEED 10% BO N ES ET 8% BLACK-EYED SUSAN 8% COMMON OX -EYE 6% GOLDEN ALEXANDER 5% SWEET FLAG 5% WATER PLANTAIN 5% ARROWHEAD 5% FLAT-TOPPED ASTER 4% WILD BERGAMOT 3% MEADOW ROSE 3% STIFF GOLDENROD 3% TALL MEADOW RUE 3% LARGE -LEAVED ASTER 2% PAN ICLED ASTER 2% RED -STALKED ASTER 2% YARROW 1% L N 100% LEGEND SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH SEED ZONE A, SEE SPECS. ABOVE PATH, SAMPLES REQUIRED, APPROX. 7,420 SF APPROX. 1,750 SIF SEED ZONE B, SEE SPECS. ABOVE SOD. APPROX 3,000 SY APPROX. 20,215 SF STANDARD BEACH SAND, ENSURE SEED ZONE C, SEE SPECS. ABOVE LOCAL SUPPLIER, SAMPLES APPROX. 4,000 SF REQUIRED. APPROX. 700 SF PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT TREE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PLANTING SIZES DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG AIPOL (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 20'-0" 10'-0" 0 20'-0" (CRO17HO O N__��) 00 O U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 0 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. LO J Cy') J LO ., Z M Ln Z W Y LO � Z � W z aUj U O p Z Q O J 2E J 0� O W i L N a LU W w Q J 0- U) > Cl)O M LUC:) >Q> 3: Z: (D W 2 Ln QL0 J U Lu O a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 0 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ---929--____ i - -929.4 con 017, , 10 / ♦ 00. 00 '0a /I - - - - - - - `':`�,♦ /^ 1 �%% ° \-- 932 D 42 S\ N\ H ,*., x 9 676 ` ��� & 7.5 lInv. � ,��,�` %s �+.rf�' 7 t k ` contour \ (D57 2 937 9 \\9 x Ol w, �1 �� >< x X90 7 \\ ♦ 08 \�, x j�130,, 214\ \\ \ ,��� 410 v \ L \x 7009 29\ x 6 C6. \ �� �x;3% � i. INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT 4%`\\\\,��� FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO 393 \ x� ______-- ♦ �; PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF \ 0 ------ - � x X131 \\ � % \ ` ` 4111 6 x 13 ♦ � `` / ` INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT �9� `�\ �� ` x 1.41' \ 32 \\ FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO \ �/ 1J* ° ` PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF �1 x 18 TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING \ ���� x 17 AREA, INSTALL AT EXISTING \\� %*. � x is x 19 x 21 GRADE, TYP. UPnn1 r`nnlr`1 1 1c1nA1 ♦ + 22 OF USE, RETUF c'o PREVIOUS CON INCLUDING AEF AND RE-ESTABI \ \\ + d� i\ ��� / TURF. \ T p 9.x'1\06 `A00 � Inds \6.J8\ y—� .. (S)\ ® �♦ 46 �o 77 ,i G ' ' 0 •♦ 4� G ♦♦ 5 s 'ice / i f 3» 0 �� pruce # i t < Spruce 11 G4 / Mr,' G14" � �i ��P lar / / I I o ,92 1 6 /' / / I I In 521 ..1 1 � �. / � , 6" x s / ;� / Poplar 0 �,. 0 G 40P1 4 1 9 41; DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE // / Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 M' Found Spike 1 A/ / I h I' 1 �y o �l H1H / 0) Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - - OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot , ORA i %I OA C NSTRUCTION ---- 3------ ENTRANCE / V I V I LIvIV I V lxLlvll llm VI 1 L11mL UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. CROURO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,I Matt Pavek DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 763-213-3944 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA zz_ :� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET / \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE \ (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U W O a a7 co In L0 0 0 O LUU a O O CO M LO J Cy') J LO LO ., Zz z Y W z 2 0 a L1J O z J W N W w rr�^ vJ W a ((D LLI I Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS swi 00 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' 92r-- i' ` 929.4 contour J------ 00 0 on MR mft i"9 I \ `%`♦ ��� ��I� �� `�♦ ro 931 •�0 i 2 Inv. ` y3j 5 contour N.,. Inv. v._ ♦ ` j \ \� 10 `4*4 � I' v 4,_ v \ ♦19 `\\�` INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF \ o� C 0 T p 9 3'106 IT 926,3\6 \ � y Vo. `ddcP 0 ♦ \ `� ♦ F.tO DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 I, ` Found Spike----- ------- ._ 4444`r��\ i \ Hyd. Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -----------`"•� OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ � v \\ O `Q �c BOJ INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT ♦ FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF ARY MULCH PA ING �`. �� ,In IN LL AT EXISTIN TYP. WON CONCLU N RETUR ITE TO \\ `�`�♦ )US CONDITI ING AERATION F SOIL, ,9� TABLISH N OF o \ ,Q ii Dund 1/2" Iron Pipe i Ed�i CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE to 10�141.e o' i ' G IG� UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEMS TO REMAIN OFFLINE UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL —� DRAINAGE ARROW ■������������������■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE E S F_ 9— SH5-z-] TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA F11 zz_ :� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE We (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 (CROURO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC U Lu O a co L0 O 0 O LUU a C) C) M LO J Cy') J LO LO n z z Y W z 2 0 a UUJ 0 z J W N W Lu Cn ~ W a W 2 Ln QN J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP -PROPOSED CONDITIONS swi ■ (D COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ::RFLOW 10 /2 OF THE CURB K HEIGHT =RFLOW AT TOP OF FER ASSEMBLY (STING CURB, PLATE, BOX, ID GRATE .TER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" I -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT 3H -FLOW FABRIC NU I t5: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ER04C. � CURB INLET FILTER NTS 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP 35' R Q R_ Zoi 0 O C N A w TO CONSTRUCTION I m AREA z W I p Z C� PLAN 35' R TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE X Lu 75' MINIMUM EXISTING UNDISTURBED FINISHED GEOTEXTILE FILTER 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE ROADWAY SPEED BUMP GRADE 1 FABRIC I I PROFILE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. 'C' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NTS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH yr r r r r r rr r o r r rrr rrr \ .� OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF rr TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. rrr r 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET NTS 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. 0 T TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE ILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED ILLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO GROUND ririp:-� EMBED ROLL. I WPM SURFACE � Val DIRECTION OF FLOW co WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO - PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH cz N � SEDIMENT FENCE NTS FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12"O.C. (c Roly 0 Ro�e \ 03 Oo \ Co 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL uj DIRECTION OF FLOW 6„ a METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. > 0) co Lo Lo z O O 0 LuU a 0 O CO M V Lo J cy') J Lo Ln n z z Y W z 2 ° 0. ui z O z J 2E W N W Lu cl) ~ W a (D W 2 Ln QN Ln J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1 02 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 # MNR100001 PAGES 1-35) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP (PART III.A) THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (PART III.B) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) (PART III.C) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION (PART III.E): THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN PART II.C. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE PART IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL() AS REQS UIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III.F.1 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTION MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION PREVENTION (PART IV.B): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV.E. ARE COMPLIED WITH. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WITH PART IV.C.5. SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER (AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR) MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEED NOTES (PART III.A.4.A): ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. SEDIMENT CONTROL (PART IV.C): SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. a. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. b. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4, A. THROUGH C. c. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.G. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND THE PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. WHEN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BE OBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. HOWEVER, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. PERMISSION TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE) MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMPS SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEE PART IV.E.4.D.). THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BE LEFT UN -COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN PART III.B. OF THIS PERMIT DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (PART IV.D): DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (PART IV.E): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT. CONTINUE INSPECTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. THIS MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL. THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. SEE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (PART IV.F): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE; SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. FUELING OPERATION PLAN: ALL FUELING SHALL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS. SPILL PREVENTION PLAN: ALL SPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY. THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAY ONSITE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES, POSTING CLEAN UP RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL. SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE: SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND SANITARY CONDITION, FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES. A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS. FINAL STABILIZATION (PART IV.G): THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF THE SITE (THAT HAS NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION) TO ANOTHER PARTY. A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION / PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER. THE ORIGINAL CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES TRAINING (PART III.A.2 DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 1/13/14-1/13/14 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2017 OWNER INFORMATION LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 CONTACT: CURT FRETHAM (C 0 R0�� Ro�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART III.A.4.B&C): I LAKE VIS SITE AREA CALCU LATIONS 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 8,996 SF EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 2,837 SF PROPOSED LOT2 OUTLOTA 15,272 SF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING COVERAGE 0 5F 0.0% 4,653 5F 16.0% 7,296 5F 12.3/0 0 5F 0.0% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner ■ LLE ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,837 SF 49.4% ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 22,827 SF 78.4% 50,243 SF 84.8% 2,901 SF 50.6% TOTAL SITE AREA 94,080 SF 100.0% 29,103 SF 100.0% 59,239 SF 100.0% 5,738 SF 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 8,996 SF 9.6% OUTLOT A 2,837 SF 3.0% LOT TOTAL (LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,272 SF 16.2% TOTAL ( LOT 1 + LOT 2 + OUTLOT A) 18,109 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 14,970 SF 15.9% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 74,000 SF SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL 2,700 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±0 EA NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 0110611 %1:11:4101 CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIREMENTS. THE REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT RE Q Q PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING VACANT SITE WITH EXTENSIVE TREE GROWTH INTO A RESIDENTIAL SITE WITH 2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART III.C. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. 2. POST CONSTRUCTION:THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART III.D. SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE PART III.D.1. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. 0) co LID LID 2 C O LUU a O O CO M LO J Cy') J LID Ln n z z Y W z 2° lig UJ z 0 z J W L0 N N W Lu V ♦ I` >_ W a W 2 Ln N QL0 J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1 3 ■ @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ''1Illte Gr R 4 U P - Minnesota Pollution Attachment A; Control Agency S 20 Lafayette Road North S PPP Site Specific Document St, Paul, MN 55155-4194 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity Doc Type-, SlorrnwaterPollutwn Praveriiorr Plan Construction Activity information Project name: IVY PLACE Project location (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) Address or describe area: 3606 IVY PLACE City or Township: ORONO State: MN Zip code: 55391 Latitudellongltude of approximate centroid of project_ 44,926034,-93-613450 Method of collection of Iatitudeflongitude: ❑ GPS F1 Online tool ❑USGS Topographic map All cities where construction will occur: OIRONO All counties where construction will occur: HENNEPIN All townships where construction will occur. Project size (number of acres to be disturbed): 1.7 Project type: M Residential ❑ Commerciallindustrfal ❑ Road construction ❑ Residential and road construction ❑ Other (describe): Cumulative Impervious surface: Existing area of impervious surface: 0.0 (lo the nearest tenth acre) Post construction area of impervious surface: 0.4 (to the nearest tenth acre) Total new area of impervious surface: DA (to the nearest tenth acre) Receiving waters Type I Special water? I Impaired Water?** (ditch, pond, wetland, lake, (See Stormwater Permit (See Stormwater Permit Water bodv ID* I Name of water Yes LJ No I L Yes LJ No ❑ Yes ❑ No I ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ©No I ❑ Yes El No Water Body identification (0) mfght not be available for alt water bodies. Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search Tool ar: 4vww acastatemn fjslwa€erlstormwaierlstarmwiter-r.htmt. Impaired water for rhe following pollutants] or stressors/: phosphorus, turbldity, dissofved oxygen, or biotic impairment. www.Fc a.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitablein alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4173104 & 8116113 Page 1 of 7 C bite G R O U P - Dates of construction (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs- Include address if available.) Construction start date: 04/0112018 Estimated completion date: 0410112019 General Construction Project Information Describe the construction activity (what will be built, general timeline, etc): THE PROJECT WiLL BE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON A EXISTING VACANT SITE. Describe soil types found at the project: THE EXISTING SOILS AT THE SITE ARE PRIMARILY SANDY LEAN CLAYS. Site Location map- Attach maps (U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle, National Wetland Inventory maps or equivalent) showing the location and type of all receiving waters, Including wetlands, drainage ditches, stormwater ponds or basins, etc. that will receive runoff from the project. Use arrows showing the direction of flow and distance to the water body !' _..r CARMAN � f BAY TdQ CA ' •• y j s t' C i vi I S ie t e Ca R Q U P - General. Site Information (iil.A) 1. Describe the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). Include the timing for installation and procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary. (III.A.4.a) THE PROJECT WILL BE PROTECTED BY TWO (2) MAIN BMP°S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SiTE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED. 2, Attach to this SWPPP a table with the anticipated quantities for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (Ill. A. 4.b) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. Attach to this SWPPP a site map that includes the following features (III.A.3.b - f): . Existing and final grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre and post-constnaction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. • Locations of impervious surfaces and soil types. • Locations of areas not to be disturbed. Location of areas of phased construction • All surface waters and existing wetlands within one mile from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater runoff from the site (identifiable on maps such as USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent). Where surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. Methods to be used for final stabilization of all exposed sail areas - 4. Were stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an environmental, archaeological, or other required local, state, or federal review of the project? ❑ Yes R No If yes, describe haw these measures were addressed in the SWPPP. (iII.A.6.) NIA 5. Is the project located in a karst area such that additional measures would be necessary to protect drinking water supply management areas as described in Minn- R. chapters 7050 and 7060? ❑ Yes Y❑ No If yes, describe the additional measures to be used. (iII.A.7.) NIA 6, Does the site discharge to a calcareous fen listed In Minn. R. 7D50-01 80, subp. 6.b.? LJ Yes Lxj No If yes, a letter of approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources must be obtained prior to application for this permit. (Part 113.6 and Part I1I.A.8) 7. Does the site discharge to a water that is listed as impaired for the following pollulant(s) or stressor(s): phosphorus, turbidity, dissolved oxygen or biotic impairment? Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search TDD! at: www. pca.state.mn.usfwaterfstormwaterlstormwale r-c,html, 0 Yes X No If no, skip to Training. Does the impaired water have an approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) with an Approved Waste Load Allocation for construction activity? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes: a. List the receiving water, the areas of the site discharging to it, and the pollutant(s) identified in the TMDL. b. List the BMPs and any other specific construction stormwater related implementation activities identified in the TMDL. If the site has a dis=charge point within one mile of the impaired water and the water flows to the impaired water but no specific BMPs for construction are identified in the TMDL, the additional BMPs in Appendix A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4 -trout stream)) must be added to the SWPPP and implemented. (III.A.7). The additional BMPs only apply to those portions of the project that drain to one of the identified discharge points. www.pca.sLate.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4J73104 rr 8176113 Page 3 of 7 ivid lite G R C1 U P - NIA 9. Identify adjacent public waters where the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has declared "work in water restrictions" during fish spawning timeframes NIA Selection of a Permanent Stormwater Management System (111. D.) 1. Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal to one acre? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, a water quality volume of fine inch of runoff from the cumulative new impervious surfaces must be retained on site (see Part IIID of the permit) through infiltration unless prohibited due to one of the reasons in Part 111-0.1.j- If infiltration is prohibited identify other method of other volume reduction (e.g., filtration system, wet sedimentation basin, regional ponding or equivalent method 2. Describe which method will be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project (111.13): • Wet sedimentation basin • InfiltrationlFiltratlon • Regional ponds ■ Combination of practices Include all calculations and design information for the method selected. See Part IIID of the permit for specific requirements associated with each method. I NFI LTRATIONIFILTRATION Calculations are within the Site Storm Water Management Report and part of this SWPPP as Attachment D. 3. If it is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, describe why. This can include proximity to bedrock or roadprojects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of anypermanent stormwater management practices. Describe what other treatment, such as grasses swates, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, will be implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters. (III.C) IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. 4. For projects that discharge to trout streams, including tributaries to trout streams, identify method of incorporating temperature controls into the permanent stormwater management system. Erosion Prevention Practices (IV.B) Describe the types of temporary erosion prevention Bill expected to be implemented on this site during construction: 1. Describe construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to minimize erosion. Delineate areas not to be disturbed (e.g., with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. SiLT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE, 2. Describe Methods of temporarily stabilizing soils and soil stockpiles (e.g., mulches, hydraulic tackifers, erosion blankets, etc.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. (�a y '� 3. Describe Methods of dissipating velocity along stormwater conveyance channels and at channel outlets (e.g., check dams, •\ sediment traps, rip rap, etc.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL OUTLETS, Y 4. Describe Methods to be used for stabilization of ditch and Swale wetted perimeters (Note that mulch, hydraulic soil tackifiers, hydromulches, etc. are not acceptable soil stabilization methods for any part of a drainage ditch or swaie) FINAL STABILLZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD, ividSite G R Co U P - 5. Describe Methods to be used for energy dissipation at pipe outlets (e.g., rip rap, splash pads. gabions, etc. RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS. 6. Describe Methods to be used to promote infiltration and sediment removal on the site prior to offsite discharge, unless infeasible (e.g., direct stormwater flow to vegetated areas): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILZED. 7. For drainage or diversion ditches describe practices to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to surface water. The last 200 lineal feet must be stabilized within 24 hours after connecting to surface waters and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased for all discharges to Special, Impaired or "work in water restrictions". All other remaining portions of the temporary or permanent ditches or swates within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water, property edge and construction in that area has temporarily or permanently ceased. NIA - NO DITCHES ON SITE 8. Describe additional erosion prevention measures that will be implemented at the site during construction (e.g., construction phasing, minimizing soil disturbance, vegetative buffers, horizontal slope grading, slope drainingAerracing, etc.): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT NOT LiMITED TO; MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE. 9. If applicable, include additional requirements in Appendix A Part C.3 regarding maintaining a 104 -foot buffer zone or installing redundant BMPs for portions of the site that drain to special waters). N/A 10. If applicable, describe additional erosion prevention BMPs to be implemented at the site to protect planned infiltration areas MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREA. Sediment Control Practices (IV.C) Describe the methods of sediment control BMPs to be Implemented at this site during construction to minimize sediment impacts to surface waters, including curb and gutter systems 1. Describe Methods to be used for down gradient perimeter control: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. 2. Describe Methods to be used to contain soil stockpiles: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY. 3. Describe Methods to be used for storm drain inlet protection: SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS. 4. Describe Methods to minimize vehicle tracking at construction exits and street sweeping activities: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. Describe Methods, If applicable, additional sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to be installed to keep runoff away from planned infiltration areas when excavated prior to final stabilization of the contributing drainage area: INFILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 6. Describe methods to be used to minimize soil compaction and preserve top soil (unless infeasible) at this site: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED. 7. Describe plans to preserve a 50 -foot natural buffer between the project's sod disturbance and a surface water or plans for redundant sediment controls if a buffer is infeasible: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. THIS PROJECT WILL DISTURB WITHIN WETLANDS BUT WILL WORK TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS 8. Describe plans for use of sedimentation treatment chemicals (e,g., polymers, flocculants, etc.) see Part IV,G,10 of the permit:. NIA Civil Site G R O U P - Pollution Prevention Management Measures (IV.I=) 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: I S ! ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEM CAL . WILL BE SEALED AND STARED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE, 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic Ruids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7435: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SiTE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent Upping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE. 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. Final Stabilization (IV.G) 1. Describe method of final stabilization (permanent cover) of all disturbed areas: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT. SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS 2. Describe procedures for completing final stabilization and terminating permit coverage (see Part W.G.1-5): UPON FINAL STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. Documentation of infeasibility: (If Applicable) www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitabte in alternative formats wq-strm2•12 • 4173104 fir 811611.? Page 5 of 7 wq•strm2•12 * 4173104 & 8116113 Page 7 of 7 CivilSite G R CDP U P - 9. Is the project required to install a temporary sediment basin due to 10 or more acres draining to a common location or 5 acres or more if the site is within 1 mile of a special or impaired water? ❑ Yes E No If yes, describe (or attach plans ) showing how the basin will be designed and constructed in accordance with Part III.0 of the permit. NIA (CROURO sRote c� n o U P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC Dewatering and Basin Draining (IV.D) 1. Will the project include dewatering or basin draining? 0 Yes M No tU LI If yes, describe measures to be used to treaUdispose of turbid or sediment -laden water and method to prevent erosion or scour of discharge points (see Part IV. D of the permit): d 2. Will the project include use of filters for backwash water? []Yes ®No if yes, describe how filter backwash water will be managed on the site or properly disposed (see Part III.D.3. of the permit): Additional BMPs for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands (Appendix A, Parts C and D) 1. Special Waters. Does your project discharge to special waters? ❑ Yes ® No 2. If proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices, then other treatment such as grassed swates, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. Describe what other treatment will be provided. NA 3, Describe erosion and sediment controls for exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope to a special waters, and temporary sediment basins for areas that drain five or more acres disturbed atone time. N/A 4. Describe the undisturbed buffer zone to be used (not less than 100 linear feet, from the special water). NiA S. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will ensure that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the t, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. 6. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting in the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events. NIA 7 Wetland . Does your project discharge stormwater with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland (e.g-, , conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond)? ❑ Yes Z No If Yes, describe the wetland mitigation sequence that will be followed in accordance with Part D of Appendix A. N/A Inspections and Maintenance (IV.E) Describe procedures to routinely inspect the construction site: .. Once every seven (7) days during active construction and, . Within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches In 24 hours, and within seven (7) days after that. Inspections must include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, and infiltration areas. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT'ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST." www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or S00-657-3864 Available in alternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 500-657-3864 Avaitabte in atternative formats www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Avaitabte in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4J 73104 & 8136113 Page 2 of 7 wq•strrn2-f2 • 4J 73104 Sr 8116113 Paye 4 of 7 wq-strm2.12 • 4113104 5r 81 16113 Page 6 of 7 M co LO L0 2 O 0 O U -1U a \: O O (fl M to J 0- C'7 J to to in Z Z Y Wz O Z O Z J W Lfo N Ww 1..-- U) (n W a 3: 3: W 2 QN J 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS QCOPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM .� Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 La fayrar Rood Nuo tr i St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 moi. , ! x v ite n R O U P ATTACHMENT B: Construction stormwater Inspection Checklist Construction Stormwater Program .r]rr. 7yr�: Fl.fm;ffpn. [:n=r-v.s' Note: This inspection report does not address all aspects of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/St ate Disposal System (NP1)ESIS DS) Construction Stormwat.er permit {Permit} issued on August 1, 2013. The completion of this checklist does not guarantee that all permit requirements are in compliance; it is the responsibility of the Permittee(s) to read and understand the permit requirements. Facility Information Site name: Facility address: Permit number: City: State: Zip code: Inspection Information Inspector name: Phone number.- Date umber:Date (mmlddlyyyy): Time: ❑ am ❑ pm Is the inspector certified in sediment and erosion control and it is documented in the Starmwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this inspection routine or in response to a storm event: Rain Fall amount (if applicable) Is site within one aerial mile of special or impaired water? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, Follow Appendix A and other applicable permit requirements. Note: If NA is selected at anytime, specify why in the comment area for that section. Erasion Control Requi rement (Part IV.B) www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page i of 4 I f ite G R b U P 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ I ❑ ❑ Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part IV.C.) Yes Yes No NA 1. Soil stabilization vahere no construction activity for 14 days? r7 da s wereapplicable) El 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? ❑ 2. Has the need to disturb steep slopes been minimized? 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? 13 ❑ 3, All ditches stabilized 200' back from p oint of disch arg a within 24 hours? Not mulch) ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are there erosion BMP's for onsite stock iIas? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Are appro PHate BM P's installed protectin g inIAsloutlets? ❑ 7. Are all infiltration systems staked and marked to avoid com action? ❑ www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page i of 4 I f ite G R b U P 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ I ❑ ❑ Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part IV.C.) Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control BM Ps (Part IV. E.) Yes No I NA 1. Perimeter control installed on all down gradient perimeter s? Ll F1 El 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? ❑ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? ❑ ❑ ❑ IF No, have redundant sediment controls been installed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Inlet proteetion on all catch basins and culvert inlets? Are inlet p rot ection devices maintained and functionin q properl ? Ll 71 5. Vehicle tracking Best Management Practices (BMPs) at all site exits? 6. All tracked sediment removed within 24 hours? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Are all infiltration systems staked and marked to avoid com action? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Are all infiltration areas protected with a pretreatment device? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Do all stockpiles have perimeter control? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control BM Ps (Part IV. E.) Comments: Other Yes No NA 1. Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296.6300 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2.36 • 3141!4 Page 2 of 4 CivilSite G R tl tf P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? Yes No I NA 1. Are all previously stabilized areas maintaining 90% ground cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Perimeter Control -Has sediment reached one half the height orthe device? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are inlet p rot ection devices maintained and functionin q properl ? Ll F1 El Comments: Other Yes No NA 1. Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296.6300 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2.36 • 3141!4 Page 2 of 4 CivilSite G R tl tf P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Does on-site fueling only occur in a contained areal L1 n L1 4. Are all solid rrestes being properly disposed of? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the concrete washout area completely contained? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the concrete washout area marked with a sign? Fl I F1 debris, inflow pipes and overfloxv spillways are clear, Inlet areas are clean, Comments: 7. Were any discharges seers during this inspection, sediment, water, or otherwise? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, state the exact location of all points of discharge. Photograph the discharge and describe the discharge (color, odor, foam, oil sheen, etc). How will it be removed? How did the discharge happen? How much was discharged? Ho,r! will it be stopped, and hrnri long mill it take to stop? Is the discharge going into an adjacent site? Was the discharge a secimen t delta? If yes, will the delta be recovered within 7 days? 8. WII a permanent storrrmater management system be udIized in this project as required and in accordance with Part IIID of the permit? Describe: 9. Is any dewatering occurring on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, where? What BMP is being used? Hrnrr much water is being deveatered? Is the water clear? Where is the water being discharged to? 10. Is a copy of the SWPPP located on the construction site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Has the SVVPPP been followed and implemented on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Is a sedimentation basin required for this project as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, are they maintained as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Is the topsoil on this project being preserved? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, explain haw the topsail is being preserved. If not, explain why it was infeasible. 14. Are all infiltration systems marked to avoid compaction? ❑ Yes ❑ No Do all infiltration areas have pretreatment devices? ❑ Yes ❑ No www.pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page 3 of 4 1'"' le G R b tf P 15. Description or areas of non-compliance noted during the inspection, required corrective actions, and recommended date of completion ofcorrective actions 16. Proposed amendments to the SWPPP 17. Potential areas of Future concern. 18. Additional comments, Disclosures: • After ciscovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more exten siv efma re location specific inspection requirements. • The Permittee(s) islare responsible for the inspection and maintenance oftorn porery and permanent water quality management BM P's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control B M P s until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part II.B.5., or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the M PCA. www.pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Avatable in altemattve formats M-stun2-36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM �_.i Va Site G R n U P ATTACHMENT C (C R017 0 Ro�e c� 00 o ao 00 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE LAKE W�EST I . All stormlNater retenTion, detention and treatment ha -.ins muse he. inspetLed dl least once a year Lo determine Lhal krasin relenlion and lreaLrnerrl DEVELOPMENT, LLC characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered Inadequate If sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by 50 percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one Vear of the inspersion daTe. 2. All grit Chdrrlbers, sump calch bdsiris, Surrlu manholes, oulleL structures, culverts, outfall structures and other storinwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. 1V'ithin 30 days ofthe inspection date, all accumulated sediment.and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage ureas must he. kept clear of IiTter and t ege.ratia r debris, inflow pipes and overflew spillways kept clear, inlet areas kept clean, and undesirable vegetation removed. Erosion irrlpairing the function or integrity crl Lhe lacilities, if ally, will be corrected, and any structural damage Impairing or threatening to Impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be inspected every three months during the operational period (between spring snn><vmclt and first srlhstantial snowfall) and monitored afrer rainfall eax�nTs of 1 J LO inch or rnpre Lo ensure Thal Ale con LrIbulirig di dindge area is tledr Ul tiller and (y) debris, inflow pipes and overfloxv spillways are clear, Inlet areas are clean, undesirable vegetation is removed and there is no erosion impairing or ^ z threatening to impair the function of a facility. If sediment has accumulated in a infiltration feature, within 30 days of inspection deposited sediments must be Z Y removed, the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils must be restored, and co W Z any surfarc disttrrhanrc must he stahili7(A. InspOrtion must ensure that LO scdimcnt traps and forehays.arra t mothan 50 e tpping sediment and thareLU z 0- O UJ V o 0 z z I o J J 0� W a O > N Lu C) W Lu i- write /a LL r^ VJ percent of the storage volume remains, the contributing drainage area is stable > ti (i.e., no erosion is observed), and inlets and outlet ioverflow. spillways are in OQ L qood conditions with no erosion. (Maintenance techniques used must protect CSO the infiltration capacity of the practice by limiting soil compaction to the M >_ greatest OXTent passible (e.g., by using low impart earth moving equipmenT). (D W 2 'L Urldeigromid Slordge Lharribers rrlust be inspecLed at least once a LID year to ensure that adequate storage capacity remains. Capacity will he Q N LID considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the storage volume by 50 J percent of its aridinal design volume. Accumulated debris and sediment will be w removed, and inlet and outlet structures will be cleared of any flow O impediments, a 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 10/18/17 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 PRELIMINARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 05 @COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' I '1 j I 31.8,7' O I / PROPOSED DELINEATED / i (� BITUMINOUS WETLAND EDGE r8, 32.09 r 33.3 I ' 31.90 floor C� N / MATCH ♦ P /. V P / THEORETICAL EXTENSION OF / BIT. DRIVEWAY TO ALIGN MATCH PROPOSED 4 ,, i �'�WITHIN EXISTING ACCESS BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TO / /,' / �\ vASEMENT. / EXISTING BITUMINOUS, TYP. / M A T C H, / r► / Fo u n d S p i ke I , IVI r , I/ A T 0 / ROADWAY EASEMENT / TO REMAIN N 15'-0" 0 30'-0'• ' 0 IVY PLACE - ORONO, MN SITE PLAN - DRIVEWAY CONNECTION GRAPHIC ! ' r-1 I 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 Project Number: 17059 Revision Number: ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 G1.0 G R Cl U P www.Civi[SiteGroup.com Issue Date: 11/29/2017 Revision Date: 855727 Parcel 67 4501 —E—A S_E_M_E_N_T_ I. THIS INDENTURE, made this day of 1961 ) between Edward A. Nicolaysingle. hereinafter referred to as "Grantor M11, and THE VILLAGE OF ORONO,.a municipal corpora- tionorganized and existing under the Is' of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called Ws "Gran'teell; WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining an easement On land hereinafter described, NOW,. THEREFORE; this indenture,witnesseth, in consideration of OneDollar and .,othe'r. good - and'valuable consideration, paid by the, Grantee to the Grantor(v) the , ,fec'eip,t and sufficiehey.of.which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor(v) hereby ..gian.t(a)..uhto the. Grantee, its successors and assigns' forever, - a. perpetual underground utility -.easement .'.over, under, and across a strip of land described asfoll6ws:. :That part of''Tracts W and X. and accretions theretot Registered Land.Surv6vitles'. - No. 461 files of Registrar of Titles; County o Hennepin,.all in Hennepin County, Minnesota*, lying within 10 feet on.each side of the following -described centerline.- Com- mencing at the most Westerly corner of Lot 185, Taylors.Sub- 'division of Spring 1Southeasterly Park Lots; thence Nort'heasterly.along the. U .So theasterly:line of . said*Tra6t W'a'distance-of 92.feet'to' ppint,'.of.beginning of the center line being desdrib.adt..thence deflecting 16ft..44014 1, a distance of 86 feet;'. thence_ deiflectin 9* left `36042f:a, distance of 253 feet;.thence,-deflecting:ri.iht'- 21029I.a*distance of -86 f"t` thence deflecting left 71049 to the - shore '.of Lake Minnetonka, and there.ending. incl uding,,but,notby way of,.limitation a full and free right and authorit y. to enter upon 9 n piid,jand to install, maintain, operate and. repair a -1d.Et'. sanitary 'sewer'ifit6rceptor, sanitary sewer.main or line, and any.and.all ��,:appurcenances.iiicide'n'tal,and related thereto,' (such are hereafter'*collectively referred Improve ent);:an to -sa Improvement, . and the Granitee d '-join'c6niiections*to id shalf. have the'rightto make au-ch,�usd*of said land4is is.reasonably necessary and advis- cbn"siruction,;iiistallation,.triaintenahce, operation -and repair of:the By accept*ance of this easement and in consideration there*for,.the Grantee for.iiseli.-ind'.iti successors and assigns covenants and agrees to re e store the surface of gjcound..'.d'fsaid, land,where S'uch:is physically possible.and practical, to approx- Amately-the. s ame . condition ' th. at.e.xisIted. .prior to.any construction- .in tallation main- tenance or'.-repaii.bf the-Improvement.within a reasonable time thereafter unless weather or. circum stances.-bo-yondGran ' tee's control do not permit. The Grantor W hereby, covenant(s),for himself and his successors, heirs'and assigns, . to refrain from performing any -act on or constructing or erecting any fixture or improvement on said land that would interfere with Grantee's right of construction, installation, operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written above-.' In the Presence.oi: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN} TRANSFER* ENTERED ROBERT F. FITZSIMMONS, ABBITOR P ' OUNTY,.MINN.. EPU-a 1.92 Certificate of Title No. 370960 862192 _E A S_E M E N_T_ THIS INDENTURE, made this / %' ;4: day of Edward A. Nicolay, unmarried, Parcel 67 Revised 483' October 1966 , between hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)", and THE VILLAGE OF ORONO, a municipal corpora- tion organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "Grantee"; WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining an easement on land hereinafter described, NOW, THEREFORE, this indenture witnesseth, in consideration of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, paid by the Grantee to the Grantor W , the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor W hereby grant(s) unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual underground utility easement over, under, and across a strip of land described as_6_1_1ows: X bPf That_part_of.Tracts W and X,�and accretlons th% eto,)Registered Land Survey No. 461_,/files of Registrar of Titles, County of M' s t Cl in within 10 feet Hennepin, all in Hennepin oun y, inne o a, y g on each side of the following -described centerline: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of Lot 185, Taylors Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said Tract W a distance of 52.4 feet to the point of be- ginning of the centerline being described; thence deflecting left 39030' a distance of 17.8 feet; thence deflecting right 100 25' a distance of 100 feet; thence deflecting left 53051' a distance of 253 feet; thence deflecting right 21029' a distance of 86 feet; thence deflecting left 71049' to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and there ending. including, but not by way of limitation a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct, install, maintain, operate and repair a.sass3taa�c -�•�' i;f« ctatioa, sanitary sewer interceptor, sanitary sewer main or line, and any and all appurtenances incidental and related thereto, (such are hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvement), and to join connections to said Improvement, and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and advis- able to the construction, installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the Improvement. By acceptance of this easement and in consideration therefor, the Grantee for itself and its successors and assigns covenants and agrees to restore the surface of the ground of said land where such is physically possible and practical, to approx- imately the same condition that existed prior to any construction, installation, main- tenance or repair of the Improvement within a reasonable time thereafter unless weather or circumstances beyond Grantee's control do not permit. The Grantor(a) hereby covenant(s) for himself and his successors, heirs and assigns, to refrain from performing any act on or constructing or erecting any fixture or improvement on said land that would interfere with Grantee's right of construction, installation, operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written above: In the presence of: 42 Z. E w rd A. Nicolay-_.__ STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this 2:f day of October, 1966, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Edward A Nicolay, unmarried, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public ROBERT W. MANN Notary Public, Hennepin County, Mink My Commission Expires May 18, 1973 862192 OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF TITLES STATE OF Nili`:PIESOTA COU7iTY OF HEONZPIN t hereby ccrli f y that the V.:4in instrument was filsd in this office on the 9. day e? NOV A. D. 1966 at 'i5o'c(ocI /vl. aI A ;OF TITLES By. D-S�TyT EGIST ^R OF TITLES i O75�; J�) ROBFFT F. FI't7P90ta3, GIIl�I:�Ii N�NNEPIN COU'lTY, MINK. Y I��' T �DEFUT.t'• 6. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, "3508 Ivy Place", Variances, 7:38 P.M. — 8:35 P.M. 7. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, "3508 Ivy Place", Vacation, 7:38 P.M. — 8:35 P.M. 8. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003,113508 Ivy Place", Conditional Use Permits, 7:38 P.M. — 8:35 P.M. Curtis Fretham, Applicant, was present. Oakden noted there are multiple applications with this project and each application will require its own motion and public hearing. The applicant is requesting the following as part of the three applications: 1. A wetland setback variance for the driveway; 2. Consideration of a variance to allow beach improvements within the wetland; 3. Approval of easement vacations for an unimproved driveway; 4. Approval of a utility easement that needs to be relocated to correspond to the actual location of the utility; and 5. A conditional use permit to move over 500 cubic yards of earth in the floodplain, excavation in the floodplain, and over 50 cubic yards of fill in the lake yard. In regards to the 17-3988 application, the wetland has been delineated along the entire lake perimeter of the property. The applicant is proposing to place the driveway 1.8 feet from the wetland boundary at the southeast corner of the property. Per the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a wetland buffer of 25 feet will be required. The City requires a setback of 10 feet from the buffer for structures and hardcover. Council 17-3988 17-3989 17-3990 Exhibit E This will require a variance to allow hardcover to be placed within the City's wetland setback and relief from the Watershed's rules regarding buffers. The applicant is proposing to meet all other setback requirements for the two newly created lots as part of the plat. The applicant is also requesting driveway width variance for the 12 -foot width proposed driveway to be placed within the 75 -foot lake yard setback where an 8 -foot maximum driveway is allowed. The 12 feet represents a reduction in the normally required shared driveway width of 20 feet. The Fire Department supports the narrow driveway with the condition that the homes be fitted with a sprinkler system. As it regards the 17-3989 application, the applicant is requesting vacation of two existing easements that are not currently in use. There is a driveway easement that will no longer be aligned with the proposed development and it would be beneficial to formally vacate the easement for clean title. The applicant is also requesting the vacation of an underground utility easement used for sanitary sewer by the City of Orono. The existing easement does not line up with the placement of the existing sewer pipe. The City is requesting the applicant vacate the unused utility easement and create a new utility easement over the existing sewer pipe. Per the City Engineer, the newly created easement must be a minimum of ten feet wide on either side of the pipe, creating a total of a 20 -foot wide underground utility easement for the sewer line. This new easement will be created as part of the final plat. As it relates to the 17-3990 application, the applicant is proposing to alter the existing floodplain by adding fill to create a building envelope above the flood elevation for the proposed homes and to create proper drainage for the site. The applicant is proposing to add fill in the center of the project and then gradually grade away from the homes towards the lake. This grading will impact a small wetland in the center of proposed Lot 2. Based on preliminary discussions with the Watershed, it appears the impact to the wetland will fall under their de minimis criteria and will not need to be mitigated. The proposal to create a beach would bring the wetland impact beyond the de minimis threshold, requiring mitigation of all wetlands. Staff does not support the alteration of the wetlands for a beach. In order to achieve appropriate grading and drainage for the site, the applicant proposes removing 1,231 cubic yards of pool soil and bring in 2,817 cubic yards of fill. Overall there will be 1,583 cubic yards of fill being added to the existing site. A conditional use permit is required if there is 500 or more cubic yards of earth being moved on a site. A portion of this cutting and filling will occur in the 0-75 foot lake yard. The applicant is anticipating the total number of trucks could range between 130-230 depending on the soil conditions. Included in Staff report is a lot analysis. Staff finds the purpose of the variances for the wetland setbacks and exceeding the 8 -foot driveway width are reasonable. The placement of the driveway is limited and the grading on the site is reasonable and consistent with the preliminary plat. The development of the proposed lots is consistent with the neighborhood to create two new single-family homes. The proximity to the wetland for the shared driveway is reasonable and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will not alter the character of the area. In addition to the City's CUP requirements for filling/grading within the floodplain district activity is subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the MCWD. The applicant has submitted an application to the MCWD along with the required plans and engineering. Staff finds the proposed vacation and conditional use permits for the project reasonable. Staff does not support filling in the wetland for the beach improvements. The Planning Commission should discuss the impact of trucking and hauling earth to and from this site and whether conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the variances. Suggested motions have been included in Staff report, including recommended conditions. Staff recommends denial of the wetland filling for the beach improvements. Thiesse asked if anything has changed dramatically from the preliminary plat. Thiesse stated it is his recollection the Planning Commission had placed a limit on the amount of fill that could be brought in. Oakden stated she is not sure how that corresponded with the City Council's final approval but that she will look into that. Thiesse stated it was direction to the applicant to provide an idea of the amount of fill that would be brought in. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, noted the Planning Commission has previously reviewed this and that he is here to answer any questions. Thiesse asked if the plan is pretty similar to what was reviewed before. Fretham stated the 8 -foot driveway was felt not to be practical and that a 12 -foot width is now being proposed. Fretham noted the Planning Commission also discussed the 2 -foot elevation of the existing home and that it was recommended they consider going a little higher, which is why it was raised it another foot. Fretham noted that increased the amount of fill a little. Thiesse asked where the beach is located and whether they can live without it. Fretham pointed out the location of the proposed beach. Fretham indicated those two spots would be 12 feet wide on each lot and that they are asking for access to the lake for each home. Fretham noted this site has over 600 feet of shoreline but yet there is not a place to access the lake. Fretham stated the lot next door has 60 feet of beach and so do the other neighbors. Landgraver asked what his definition is of a beach. Fretham stated that area is currently defined as a wetland and that he does not know the technical terminology of what defines a wetland. Fretham stated a beach to him means that it would have an opening that would be free to the water. Landgraver asked whether it would be rocks or lawn. Fretham indicated it would likely be lawn or sand to blend in with the existing sand. Thiesse asked if they could mitigate those two spots. Fretham stated they could mitigate on site. Barnhart noted according to the comments of the Watershed District, when the beaches are added in, then the site goes over the de minimis criteria and it starts to become difficult to justify the impact to the wetland. Barnhart stated the Watershed District sees the creation of the beaches as an alteration. Thiesse asked if the beaches fall under the purview of the Planning Commission. Barnhart stated it would need to go through a public hearing process. Lemke asked why the beaches are on that side. Fretham indicated the other side is lagoon and not as clean of water. Schoenzeit asked if they will just be adding sand versus digging out muck. Fretham stated they would be removing earth about a foot along the whole shoreline in the event of high waters but that they would not be removing anything for the beaches. Fretham commented he is not sure whether it is really a beach but that it is more of an access point to the water. Lemke asked whether rain gardens were proposed at one time. Fretham noted they went to a 100 -year stormwater system, which is shown on Lots 1 and 2. Landgraver asked if the neighbor's concerns about drainage have been addressed. Fretham indicated they will be capturing the hard surface runoff on the site and that the other dotted area on the plan shows the detail of the grading that will take place along the common property line. Landgraver stated the other concern was where the driveway would connect to the street. Landgraver asked what the Council's thoughts were about that. Fretham indicated the proposed driveway is as shown and that they have not made a lot of changes there. Fretham noted they do not have a lot of control over it because the road pretty much dead ends. Barnhart stated he does not recall any changes to the configuration to the driveway but that the resolution included language that the condition of Ivy Place and the private driveway be noted prior to construction and after construction. Lemke asked if the building outline is exact. Fretham indicated those are approximate. Lemke asked if they will get smaller. Fretham stated they likely will not get larger. Lemke asked if there is a consideration for the height. Fretham noted there is a view easement on Lot 2, which is why the building footprint on that lot is more stretched out. Fretham indicated they have been in discussions about purchasing the easement so the height of the building can be increased but that he is not sure where that is at this point. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Jay White, 3560 Ivy Place, stated the yellow line on the map is the wetland border. White pointed out their property and the easement, which has been surveyed on their property. White commented he is not sure how they can fit a 12 -foot driveway into a 10 -foot easement and that he is not sure why the calculations are not four feet off. White indicated he has spoken with the Watershed District about it and they have verified that is the correct wetland border. White stated an 8 -foot driveway would fit there but that a 12 -foot driveway would be into the setback. Schoenzeit noted the applicant is requesting a 1.8 foot setback into that area. White stated he has been out there countless times, measured it a few times, and that he does not see how a 12 -foot driveway will fit in there. In addition, the Watershed District has verified where the boundary is. White stated he would like to hear from the developer about what proof he has that he is not going into the wetland rather than coming back at a later time for an after -the -fact variance. White stated in addition, the practical difficulty statement made about the access easement for the property predates any knowledge of the presence of wetlands and therefore should be allowed. White stated the basis of the developer's argument for the driveway is that statement but he does not know what type of proof the developer has that that is true. White noted the photographic evidence at the sketch plan review showed that it was a wetland and that something changed in 1968 when the access was granted. In 1975, Orono had the whole point still as wetland. White stated he is wondering whether there is any proof that at the time the access easement was given that they had no knowledge of wetland. White stated it appears the City had knowledge of the wetland and that he is not sure what the basis is for the variance. White stated with regard to the fill, it was stated to be 1,300 cubic yards but that there has been no mention of the dirt being moved. At the Planning Commission meeting it was stated that if it is more than that, it would be a different project. White noted they are pulling 1,200 cubic yards out and bringing 1,600 cubic yards back in. White stated that was not addressed and it was proposed at a lot less. White noted the developer is talking about 270 truckloads and that the safety concerns are three times what was discussed and is radically different than what was discussed. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission is a recommending body and that amount was changed at the Council level because they requested the home elevations be raised. Thiesse indicated the number discussed at the Planning Commission meeting was just to give the Council an idea of where the Planning Commission's thinking was at. Schoenzeit noted the City Council can approve a higher number. White stated he does not recall the Council talking about bringing in more fill. White stated his house is at 932' and this house is 934', which is where all the drainage concerns come in since the house will only be 15 feet away. White stated in his view there was not an adjustment made by the Council for the additional fill and that the developer was very vague about the number earlier, which is why the Planning Commission requested a number. White stated this plan is different than what was reviewed in October. Thiesse stated the plan is not significantly different but that the fill numbers have changed. Jonathan Paul, 3532 Ivy Place, stated during the time period he has resided on Casco Point, he has seen a number of homes rebuilt, some of them more than once. During those time periods the construction affects the neighborhood since there are significant problems with traffic, trash, issues with the subcontractors using the park as a urinal, and a lot of safety factors. Paul stated he would ask the Planning Commission to come out to Ivy Place in two separate vehicles, with one vehicle starting at each end and then drive towards each other. Paul stated the Commissioners will then see how narrow the road is. Paul stated there is no reasonable place to park pickup trucks and other construction vehicles and that this will be a huge encumbrance on the neighborhood. Paul requested the Planning Commission think long and hard about the impact to the neighborhood. In addition, Paul stated he has a lot of reservations about how the project will get done. Paul stated in his view the details need to be looked at closer before approving it. Paul requested the Planning Commissioners come out to Ivy Place and view the area that is proposed to be developed. Fretham stated as it relates to the wetland delineation, Page C2.0 depicts the edge of the wetland buffer and it shows a 1.8 -foot distance between it with a 12 -foot driveway. Barnhart stated the comment was related to the easement and it appears that the 1.8 feet is from the edge of the wetland and that the 12 -foot driveway goes over the edge of the easement. Barnhart suggested the applicant confirm those measurements prior to appearing before the City Council. Fretham stated they can also move the driveway further over. Barnhart stated that may be necessary. White indicated he measured from the furthest the road can go to his property and that they are taking it as close as they can get to the proposed house. White stated the only direction they can go is closer to his house. Thiesse requested the developer confirm the measurements. Fretham indicated he is in agreement with that. Thiesse stated there was also a comment that the access easement predates the wetland delineation. Barnhart stated there seems to be some evidence that much of this lot was wetland back in the 1930s but that there is not enough evidence for the DNR to say that it is a wetland and therefore unbuildable. The recent wetland delineation definitively identified the boundary of the existing wetland. Barnhart noted wetland delineations do expire. Landgraver noted the most recent wetland delineation is the one that is relevant. Thiesse asked if the building elevations have changed. Fretham stated he cannot state they have been raised on the plan for certain but that he asked his builder to raise the floor one foot based on the direction of the City Council. Fretham stated the old set of plans from the Planning Commission meeting will have the lower elevation. Thiesse asked if construction vehicles will be confined on the site. Fretham indicated they will be and that the site is over two acres. Fretham stated the onsite parking area has been identified on the plans. Thiesse asked if the importing and exporting of material will be utilizing the same trucks. Fretham indicated it will be and that has not been taken into account in their numbers. Fretham stated the number of truckloads is a worst-case scenario and that making combined trips was not taken into account. Fretham commented while it seems like a lot of material, if they take a 2,500 square foot foundation and dig a 10 -foot basement, that amounts to 1,800 cubic yards for both homes. Fretham stated they are not really doing anything out of the ordinary, and while there will be a lot of truck traffic, it is not extraordinary for a home construction. Schoenzeit recommended the developer keep the truck trips down since that will also help preserve the road. Schoenzeit commented the developer has a vested interest in keeping the number of truckloads down. Landgraver stated the reason for the refined numbers on the truck traffic is so the people in the neighborhood and the City Council are making an informed decision. Schoenzeit commented he would not want to say they can do it in 95 truckloads and then have it doubled. Schoenzeit stated it is unfortunate the developer is asking for so many but that the higher number helps set the expectations out there so everyone is aware of the number. Lemke asked if any time restrictions should be placed on the trucks. Thiesse asked if the grading will take place at a singular time. Fretham indicated they have found poor soils on the site and the soils are not supportive of a foundation without either soil corrections or pilings. Fretham stated it is potentially feasible to correct the soils but that there likely will be the need to draw the water table down while the correction takes place. Fretham indicated he is not sure if they will be able to get those permits and that the numbers assume they will be doing soil correction. Paul stated a comment was made at the City Council meeting about potentially limiting truck traffic times. Paul indicated the bus picks up at 6:50 in the morning and drops off 3:20 in the afternoon. Paul noted there are no sidewalks on Ivy Place and that the children walk down the street to get to their homes. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. Landgraver asked what the existing constraints are on construction times. Barnhart indicated City Code includes hour restrictions for truck traffic, and if the Planning Commission feels it appropriate, restrictions can be placed on the hours. Curtis stated house construction is allowed from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. during the week and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on the weekends and holidays. Olson noted the Planning Commission can require a later starting time. Thiesse asked whether the applicant would be okay with trucking activity between 7:30 to 3:00 p.m. Fretham asked whether it would be satisfactory if they just take a break for an hour between 3:00 and 4:00. Thiesse indicated he would let the City Council decide that. Barnhart noted the City Council applied a similar condition to a project a couple of years ago while school was in session but not during the summer. Landgraver stated he would like to see that on this project. Fretham asked whether the Planning Commission's intention with the restrictions on the trucking was limited to the hauling of the fill and not delivery of materials. Thiesse indicated that is correct. Schoenzeit asked if everyone will be able to turn around on the site. Fretham indicated that is correct once the driveway is constructed. White noted the easement is for access in and egress out, with no stopping, no parking, and no meetings taking place in that area on his private property. Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission has any thoughts about vacation of the easements. The Planning Commission raised no issues with the easement vacations. Lemke asked if the condition of the road will be able to handle all of the traffic in and out. Thiesse stated they do not know that at this time but that the road will be put back like and kind. Landgraver stated as it relates to the beaches, anyone who owns a property in this area will want to enjoy that view. Landgraver stated practically speaking there will be foot traffic and the owner is going to go down to the lake. Landgraver asked if the Planning Commission wants to have a discussion on whether endorsing the beach is worthwhile. Thiesse commented he is all for it but that he does not know all the ramifications of it. Oakden stated it will trigger additional wetland alteration. Currently the applicant is below that threshold so no alteration needs to be done. Thiesse stated it would be a wonderful amenity and likely will happen whether it is allowed or not. Fertham stated the Lupients were being very friendly when they granted the Watershed District the right to put wetland all along the shoreline and place a wetland easement over it, which is rather encumbering on this site, and then not getting any wetland mitigation in exchange. Fretham stated he will probably bring that point up to the Watershed District. Schoenzeit stated regardless if the City approves it or not, the Watershed District will have the final say on it. Thiesse stated he would prefer the Watershed District weigh in on it. Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, granting of a wetland setback variance for a driveway exceeding the 8 -foot maximum width for driveways in the Shoreland setback contingent on final plat approval and MCWD approval of the wetland buffer impact, subject to verification of the wetland boundary. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Schoenzeit moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, granting of vacation to the driveway and utility easements subject to final plat approval, the comments of the City Engineer, and replacement with a new utility easement on final plat approval VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Schoenzeit moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient, PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, granting of a conditional use permit subject to final plat approval; approval of all MCWD permits; approval from the DNR prior to obtaining the land alteration permit; approval from WCA; no hauling of fill before 7 a.m. or between 3:00 and 4:00 while school is in session; confining construction vehicle parking to the site; following construction of the driveway, trucks must go nose in and nose out; and subject to a review of the conditions of the roadway prior to and after construction. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 10/18/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 11/8/2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 1/8/2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: Meeting Date Subject: 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 Lake West Development LLC o/b/o Rick and Barbara Lupient, PIDS: 2011723420003, 2011723420002 and 2011723420001 (Lots 1,2,3 Block 1 Casco Point Addition) "Ivy Place" Variances, Conditional Use Permit and Vacation of Easements Public Hearing Application Summary: 17-3988: The applicant is requesting wetland setback, moving over 50 CY of earth within the 75 foot lake yard setback, and driveway width within the lakeyard variances. 17-3989: Vacation of easements to be replaced with a new utility easement 17-3990: Conditional Use Permit for altering the floodplain and land alterations of more than 500CY. The applicant also propose the filling of a small wetland internal to the site, and the establishment of a beach area, altering the wetland on the NNE side of the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends separate motions responding to : 17-3988: Approval of Variances from the wetland setback, and from the standard that permits up to 8 foot wide driveway in the shore setback zone to facilitate the construction of a private shared driveway to serve the two lots. Consideration of a variance to allow beach improvements within the wetland. 17-3989: Approval of Easement Vacations for an unimproved driveway, and a utility easement that needs to be relocated to correspond to the actual location of the utility 17-3990: Approval of Conditional Use Permits to allow over 500 cubic yards of fill in the floodplain, excavation in the floodplain, and over 50 cy of fill in the lake yard. Approval of the wetland impact of filling the small wetland in the interior of the site, but staff does not support the filling or altering of the wetland for the beach improvements. All actions subject to WCA, Watershed, and Final Plat approval. Background In September, the City Council reviewed and approved (17-3962) the Preliminary Plat for Ivy Place, a 2 lot residential subdivision at the northern end of Ivy Place, a public street. The applicants propose the replatting the previously established the three lots into two buildable parcels and one outlot, as a front lot/ back lot configuration. The application suggest the construction of two homes meeting the setback requirements. To facilitate construction, substantial grading must occur, a small wetland must be filled in the center of proposed lot 2, and most of the existing trees on site will be removed. The driveway serving the properties 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 2 of 10 would impact the Watershed's buffer and the city's setbacks. In all, several variances (17-3988), conditional use permits(17-3990), easement vacation(17-3989) , and wetland impacts, all requiring a public hearing, where identified, and the approval of the preliminary plat was conditioned on approval of these requests. 17-3988 Variance: Wetland has been delineated along the entire lake perimeter of the property. The applicant is proposing to place the driveway 1.8 feet from the wetland boundary at the SE corner of the property. Per the Watershed District, a wetland buffer of 25 feet will be required. The city requires a setback of 10 feet from the buffer for structures and hardcover. This will require a variance to allow hardcover to be placed within the City's wetland setback and relief from the Watershed's rules regarding buffer The applicant is proposing to meet all other setback requirement for the 2 newly created lots at part of the Plat. The applicant is also requesting driveway width variance for the 12 foot width proposed driveway to be placed within the 75 foot lakeyard setback where a 8 foot maximum is allowed. The 12 feet represents a reduction in the normally required shared driveway width of 20 feet. The Fire Department supports the narrow driveway with the condition that the homes be sprinklered. 17-3989 Vacation: The applicant is looking to vacate two exiting easements that are not in use. There is a driveway easement that will no long be aligned with the proposed development. It is beneficial to formally vacate the easement for clean title. The applicant is also requesting the vacation of an underground utility easement used for sanitary sewer by the City of Orono. The existing easement does not line up with the placement of the existing sewer pipe. The city is requesting the applicant vacate the unused utility easement and create a new utility easement over the existing sewer pipe. Per engineer comments, the newly created easement must be a minimum of 10 feet wide on either side of the pipe, creating a total of a 20 foot wide underground utility easement for the sewer line. This new easement will be created as part of the final plat. 17-3990 Conditional Use Permit: The applicant is proposing to alter the existing floodplain by adding fill to create a building envelope above the flood elevation for the proposed homes and to create proper drainage for the site. The applicant is proposing to add fill in the center of the project then gradually grade away from the homes towards the lake. This grading will impact a small wetland in the center of proposed Lot 2. Preliminary discussions with the watershed indicate this impact will fall under their de minimis criteria, and need not be mitigated. The proposal to create beach would bring the wetland impact beyond the de minimis threshold, requiring mitigation of all wetlands. Staff does not support the alteration of the wetlands for a beach. Plan C3.1 (Exhibit D) depicts the change in the floodplain and the proposed grading for the development. To achieve appropriate grading and drainage for the site the applicant proposes removing 1,231 cubic yards of poor soil and bringing in 2817 cubic yards of fill. Overall there will be 1583 cubic yards to fill being added to the exiting site. A CUP is required if there is 500 or more cubic yards of earth being moved on a site. A portion of this cutting and filling will occur in the 0-75 lake yard. They anticipate a totally number of trucks could range from 130-230 depending on the soil conditions. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET for the Total Site Development Section 78-1605 - Setbacks: 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 3 of 10 DISTRICT LR -1C Required Proposed Wetland 35' or 10' + buffer 11.8' Applicable Regulations: Variance: Wetland setback (78-1605) The MCWD has established a 25 foot buffer surrounding the wetland and the city requires an addition 10 foot setback in addition to the buffer creating a 35 foot setback on the development site. The applicant is requesting a 1.8 foot setback from the edge of the wetland to create a driveway which gives access to the site. Access to the site is limited to this location without substantial impacts to adjacent properties. Variance: Drivewav width to exceed 8 feet wide in the Shoreland Overlav setback. It was discussed during the preliminary plat review to allow a shared driveway verses a public road and through that discussion it was deemed a 12 foot wide shared driveway seemed appropriate and reasonable for this development. A shared driveway should be 20 feet to support fire access. Vacation: A Sanitary sewer easement (Documents 855727 and 862192) runs along the west side of the point, and the utility easement does not fully cover the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure. The developer proposes vacation of the easement, to replace it with one that fully supports the infrastructure. The new easement will be a minimum of 20 feet wide, 10 feet on either side of the existing pipe. An unimproved driveway easement (Document 1023891) supporting the original lots is proposed to be vacated as this easement is not needed and clean title is desirable. Conditional Use Permit: Filling 1000500+CY of fill in the Floodplain (78-1126) The applicant is proposing to remove earth from the floodplain, reestablishing a floodplain that will provide for building sites while not increasing flood impacts elsewhere. The project will create an additional 291 CY of floodplain for the overall development. Moving over 50 Cubic Yards of earth within the setback of the Shoreland Overlav District (17- 1286 The application is proposing to excavate 1231 CY and bring in 2814 CY of new fill to the site to make proper buildable space and grading for the proposed homes. A portion on this grading work will take place within the 75' lakeyard setback. Conditional Use Permit Land Alternation (Section 78-967 and Section 78-1286): According to the City Code, grading and filling activities exceeding 500 cubic yards conducted on properties within the Shoreland Overlay District require a CUP. Further, grading exceeding 50 cy in shore setback zone requires a CUP, per section 78-967. Alteration of Wetlands (Section 78-1610). The filling of a portion of wetland for the home, and the two wetlands for the beach areas requires a permit, following a public hearing and Planning Commission review. The driveway proposed will not impact the wetland, only the wetland buffer and wetland setback. 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 4 of 10 Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Variances (Wetlands, width) According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of the wetland setback is to preserve the wetland. The applicant proposes minimal improvements in the only location feasible. The applicant plans to utilize BMP to minimize and protect the wetland. The intent of the driveway width maximum is to minimize hardcover in the shore setback. Allowing for a 12' wide shared driveway to gain access to two parcels is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinances, which is to manage hard cover in the 0- 75'. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan notes the need to protect the natural environment, including wetlands. The reduced setback, coupled with the management practices employed protects the wetlands. Allowing access and proper drainage for two newly created lots in consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant's request to construct a 12' wide driveway and create proper drainage to serve the two newly created lots is reasonable. There is no other location available that would avoid impacts to the wetlands and outside the lake yard without impacting the adjacent residential lot. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant did not develop the point, or place wetlands on the property. The unique circumstances were not created by the applicant in either variance situation. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The encroachment is non-structural and connects to the existing access for neighboring parcels. 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 5 of 10 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been the only factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a driveway for access a principle structure is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. Variances requested are from performance standards of the code, not uses. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The applicant's property is unique because it is surrounded by Lake Minnetonka with no access via vehicle that would meet the requirements of the ordinance without impacting the adjacent residential lot. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The orientation of the applicant's property between the lake and the wetland and having no direct access to a public road is relatively unique. The configuration of the property as a point into Lake Minnetonka additionally differentiates the parcel. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. There is no opportunity to place a driveway into the site without impacting the wetland setback, or improvements in the lake yard. Allowing the applicant to alter the land within the shoreland setback is necessary for the development of the two proposed lots. Without access, the applicant lose substantial property rights. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff believes this criteria to be met because the proposed 12 foot wide shared driveway ties into the existing access for the site and the grading within the shoreland setback will address water concerns that currently exist on the site. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variance is necessary in order to allow access and development of the two proposed platted lots. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 6 of 10 application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature is it consistent with the permitted uses for the property. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the property. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood. The applicant believes the proposing grading plan will allow for more floodplain and will create suitable lots for two new homes on the proposed lots. The grades, once established, should have no adverse impacts on the neighborhood. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed grades will help to facilitate stormwater runoff down property lines, and not toward adjacent properties. The proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; This condition is satisfied. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed grading for creating a building pad, adequate drainage for the lots and stormwater management will not change the intended residential use of the property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The action of importing and exporting of fill can have temporary adverse impacts on the neighborhood. Often substantial grading in residential zones creates temporary noise, dust, and vibration. The Planning Commission may suggest hour restrictions and timelines, a public information program, to minimize the impact to the neighborhood. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses The applicant has provided a landscape plan which will serve to reestablish vegetation. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; See #9 above. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving 17-3988,17-3989,17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 7 of 10 the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed project will be creating more floodplain area to better manage stormwater for the site. The project will also create a drainage pattern and should help improve water quality off site. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The Applicant will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Additionally Section 78-1286(e) provides guidance for the granting of a conditional use permit in the Shoreland. Specifically, 78-1286(e) states the following: (1) Grading or filling in any type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: The grading impacting the small interior wetland appears to be supported by WCA, whose review is ongoing. Staff recommends any approval contingent on WCA approval. (2) Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. (3) Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re -vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (4) Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re - vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (5) Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service. The applicant will be required to adhere to the 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 8 of 10 City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re -vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (6) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. The stability of the finished grade will be component of the approval of the permits. (7) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the city engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater. The project does not contemplate the creation of or work on steep slopes. Not applicable. (8) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. Not applicable. (9) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner of the department of natural resources under Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. The applicant will receive all approval before any work begins. (10) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. The proposed alterations are proposed to take place within the property boundaries and are necessary to allow the proposed platted lots to have a building envelope for single family homes. (11) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. A riprap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of section 78-969. Not applicable. Septic System Status The property will be served by municipal water and sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties for Variance and Conditional Use Analysis Staff finds the propose variances for wetland setback, and exceeding the 8' maximum width for driveways in the shore land setback seem reasonable and necessary for development of the proposed plat. The placement of the driveway is limited and the grading on the site is reasonable and consistent with the preliminary plat. The development of the proposed lots is consistent with the neighborhood to create two new single family homes. The proximity to the wetland for the shared driveway is reasonable, consistent with the comprehensive plan and will not alter the character of the area. In addition to the City's CUP requirement for filling/grading within the floodplain district activity 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 9 of 10 is subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the MCWD. The applicant has submitted an application to the MCWD along with the required plans and engineering. Staff finds the proposed vacation and CUPS for the project reasonable with meeting all the requirements for a condition use permit for grading the floodplain and land alterations. Staff does not support the filling of the wetland for beach improvements. Engineer Comments The engineer has given comments at the time of preliminary plat, see attached Exhibit F, which must be met before final plats can be approved. The engineer gave an addition comment to ensure the newly created easement over the city sewer line is at minimum 10 feet wide on either side of pipe, which totals a 20 foot wide easement needed. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission should discuss the impact of trucking and hauling earth to and from this site, as the applicant proposed a range of 130-230 total trucks to complete the project. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission may consider the following motions and make them separately as they pertain to their application number: 1. 17-3988: Approval of the wetland setback approval of a variance for a driveway exceeding the 8' maximum width for driveways in the shoreland setback variances contingent on the following a. Final Plat Approval b. MCWD Aprpoval of the wetland buffer impact 2. 17-3989: Staff recommend approval of the proposed driveway and underground utility easement vacation with the replacement of a new utility easement contingent the following a. Final Plat Approval b. Engineering Comments c. Replacement with new utility easement on final plat approval and all engineering comments are met. 3. 17-3990: Approval for the proposed Conditional Use Permits for filling 1000+CY of fill in the floodplain, moving over 50 CY of earth within the 75 foot lakeyard, and 500 CY 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20, 2017 Page 10 of 10 within the site contingent on the following: a. final plat approval b. approval for all permits related to the MCWD c. Applicant shall receiwve approval from the SNR Commission prior to received land alteration permit d. Approval from MCWD e. WCA Approval; 4. Staff recommends denial of the wetland filling for the beach improvements. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Project Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Plans Exhibit D. Site Plans for Grading and Floodplain Alternations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Plat Response Comments for Enginner Exhibit G. Easement Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 14 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Approval Temporary Site Plan for River Valley Sports Use of a Tent for Sales Display Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider a temporary site plan for River valley sports to erect a tent for three months, from January 19, 2018 to March 19, 2018 to accommodate post boat show sales and display. 2. Background. This item was tabled at the November 27, 2017 City Council meeting. Council members wanted additional information as to the ownership of the property, and verification of parking. River Valley sports is a marine based sales and service business at 1444 Shoreline Drive. Boat sales and service is a permitted use at the subject property, zoned B-2. River Valley sports has submitted a special event permit for their proposed event, which includes the use of a large (39' by 82') heated tent to the north of the existing sales and service building. Closer review of the special event request yielded the decision that the request is actually a site plan review. Section 78-142 of the Orono City Code states: It shall be unlawful to construct a building, enlarge the footprint of a building, or change or intensify the use of an existing building or site in any business or industrial district without approval of a site plan in accordance with this division. As previously stated, Boat sales are a permitted use under the zoning ordinance and because the applicant wants to construct a tent, the code contemplates that the applicant must receive site plan approval. Site plan review and approval would normally be handled at a staff level. In the case, due to the lengthy but temporary nature of the tents, and the need to document parking solutions, on a busy thoroughfare, it seemed appropriate for the Council to act on the request. It is important to remember that property owners have a right to engage in permitted uses as provided within the zoning district. City staff and the Council have very little discretion to deny the application. It is generally arbitrary and unlawful to deny a permit for a permitted use, unless the zoning is subsequently changed to prohibit the use. The Council may attach reasonable conditions to the site plan approval, but the conditions must be reasonably related to an identified problem. The tent would be located in the parking lot. Parking spaces necessary to support the retail business will be located in front of the tent, and across the street as shown on the attached site plan. Ownership/ tenants. 1444 Shoreline is owned by EOF Investments. EOF investments has three tenants occupy the property, Browns Bay Marina, Your Boat Club, and River Valley Power and Sport. Based on their respective uses, Browns Bay Marina and River Valley Power and Sport Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: jl 6a Approved By: .1J)96Z AGENDA ITEM are permitted uses in the B-2 zoning District. Your Boat Club, by virtue of being a boat club, is a conditional use. Only River Valley Power and Sport is requesting the use of the tent. The expansion of a permitted use, temporary or long term, is permissible following review of a site plan. A condition is recommended to expressly prohibit the Boat Club from having a presence in the sales tent. Parking. The uses of the three tenants on the property require 70 spaces in the summer, and 15* (open spaces) in the winter. Parking requirements and provided parking is summarized in Exhibit C. The applicants have provided parking plans based on aerial photography, Exhibit B. Staff completed its' own analysis based on the to -scale site plans accepted as part of the Boat Club application, Exhibit D. The gravel lots to the east of the sales operation can support 17 "legal" spaces. Legal spaces defined as 9' by 20', with an adjacent 24 foot wide aisle. It is understood that historically more vehicles are parking in that lot than are shown by staff. Additional legal spaces can be found on the adjacent residential lots (13), and in the triangular shaped gravel area north of the gazebo (5). The adjusted parking requirement is 18 spaces (15 spaces = 20% of the total required, plus 3 more for the tent parking (1/800 sq ft)). The parking synopsis shows that the parking requirements of all three commercial entities, and the two residential parcels can be satisfied via the existing parking. *City code reduces the number of parking stalls required by Marina/ sales uses in winter. Winter parking rules require at least 20% of the "required off street parking" spaces remain open for winter use; boats may be stored on 80% of the parking areas. The proposed site plan meets the parking requirements imposed by the City Code and previous approvals. Noise levels. The noise levels of the heaters was questioned. The supplier has indicated that the decibel reading at 3 feet is 71 decibels. 70 decibels is comparable the sound of a vacuum cleaner, or a department store, Exhibit E. 3. Staff Recommendation. Because the proposal meets the requirements for use, parking, and other applicable city ordinances, Staff recommends approval of the temporary site plan/ special event permit subject to the following conditions: A. At least 18 spaces must be preserved for retail sales parking. B. Written permission from the owner of 1442 and 1440 Shoreline Drive must be provided to use these spaces. 1442 and 1440 may be used for parking, but not boat storage. C. Sales functions may not occur after 10 pm. D. No repair or similar service may take place in the tent. E. Tent shall meet all applicable fire and building codes. F. Tent shall be removed and site restored no later than March 30, 2017. G. Your Boat Club or its affiliates may not have a presence in the tent. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: jl 6a Approved By: .1J)96Z AGENDA ITEM Motion to approve the site plan for the tent, subject to the 6 conditions noted above. Exhibits Exhibit A. Application materials Exhibit B. Applicant's parking plans Exhibit C. Parking Synopsis Exhibit D. Parking site Plan: staff Exhibit E. Noise comparisons References Exhibit A. Division 4 of the City Code (starting at section 78-141) pertaining to site plan review Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -Tga Rivervalley sports Exhibit A - Hennepon County Property Map Date: 9/29/2017 PARCEL ID: 1111723220017 OWNER NAME: Eof Investments LIc PARCELADDRESS: 1444 Shoreline Dr, Orono MN 55391 PARCELAREA: 0.63 acres, 27,652 sq ft A -T -B: Torrens SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial -Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non -Homestead MARKET VALUE: $2,200,000 TAX TOTAL: $73,797.82 ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial -preferred HOMESTEAD: Non -homestead MARKET VALUE: $2,022,800 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsu itable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injuryorloss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 40' x 90' Structure Tent Enclosed with Trolls/doors Heated and Lighted Set for 2 Months E F F F = Double Door F = 350K BTU Heater -Light Foxture No Smokingin Tent F = Fire Extinguisher No Cooking In Teat Specil-Cattops Type BTUtbf Ignition CFM Voltage Fraquency Pita se Curmnt Hose & Regulatoir Thermostat Net Weight Length Width Height Wheel Kit Item #' THC-J55CDF, Flagro Tent Heaters Dual fuel inter ange tr* sew.tor valveto el t fuel type :7 3. "perm 3s,,ff,.ic ally controlled fcx a consivvt, conto!'# bwcnint el Numerous duct opcon for a., a. -,'i con-sinrue, on ap lic ons Operates as botn a 4]res!.,i air circ.; A;r w. a !,eater a-. the twee. of a say ".rc- tlf ■ Easi to se" un, S .r quie, and eft"civit upe 2 Dual! Fuel 330,0011,, Direct Spars.. 2. 4 *, , ffV 60 Hz 15 amps 15 fti Hose S ReqwatorAs"noly ft r-crd fy-;r remote l 347 '13s .1 - . 115 its 32-5 in 421 i€ Standard M ft 1716-xible DutVTHCP-W1) 10) Duct DiT,,jser(THCP-DD) Heat Diffuseer(THCP-HD85, THCP+10175) Jeremy arnhart From: Anna Carlson Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:38 AM To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: FW: River Valley Power and Sport Tent Structure Permit Attachments: doc00493520171031091810.pdf Jeremy, Please review the attached and below email from 1444 Shoreline Dr. Thanks. Anna -----Original Message ----- From: Luke Stoker [mailto:luke.stoker@rivervalleyinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:35 AM To: Anna Carlson <acarlson@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: River Valley Power and Sport Tent Structure Permit After Sitting with Ultimate Events the final tent size would be 39'x82. Attached shows the tent with 10' of clearance from our building and 14' from the property line (19' from the adjacent building) of an adjacent property that we own as well. Attached is the CAD of the structure showing the doorway/exit sign placement, fire extinguishers, heaters and lighting. Also included is overflow parking areas, any overflow on the East side of Shoreline DR is served by two lighted crosswalks. Again Your Boat Club on the East side of Shoreline Dr is closed for the season for the period that we are looking at having the structure present. Our company is partners in the ownership of adjacent properties 1444,1442 and 1442 Shoreline Drive. Again we request an allowance on the 20' set back from our 1444 Shoreline building from the Fire Marshall. As for the propane supply, for the heaters, we look for input on placement. Options we have discussed are in front of the house at 1442 just off the gravel parking lot, behind the tent on the blacktop on 1444 or behind the building at 1444. Do we need a permit for the propane supply as well? Please let me know what else you may need from us on our end. With the Super Bowl coming to town, Ultimate Events would like to make sure we get on the schedule for equipment as soon as possible. Thank you for working with us on this and your time! Luke Stoker I Director of Business Development River Valley Power and Sport 612-382-9006 1 RiverValleyPowerand Sport.com -Original Message ----- From: noreply@coordinated.com[ma iIto: noreply@coordinated.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:18 AM To: Luke Stoker<1uke.stoker@rive rvaIleyinc.com> Subject: Scanned Image Scanned image from copier. Do Not Reply. TASKalfa 306ci [00:17:c8:28:c8:9a] City of Orono P.O. Box 66 2750 Kelley Parkway Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 %-A,Nv.ci.orono.mn.us FOR CITY USE ONLY Date Received: Permit Number Permit Fee: $25.00 CITY OF ORONO - TENT PERMIT (All tent permits must be approved by the Fire Chiej) Tent Information: :1 Date of Event: I !� 1 t$ - 3 t� Size of Tent(s): -s`tx �9 Number of Tent(s): Does the tent have sides? No &D Please include Fire Retardant Information from the rental company for tent(s) AND a Sketch or Drawing of where the tent will be located on the property along with this application. Owner Information: Site Address: 1444 stAWL15 L trjs DY"L Owner: 401%V -I) 6400ZDJ Mailing Address: City: u-�-;,ac's Home Phone: $Sa - T46 T"q Zip: S531-1 l Alternate Phone: 61a.31ba -414 0 6 c..Zke STov-e�A- 5" Cjl Contractor / Applicant Information: Contractor/App.: Aw*k Jvtr ,\ley Pa%x-SPSC-Contactt- Person: 5lnm Address: 1444 9VWtaAOt OQ� Phone: ct� ` 449 `` 11c I Fax: w)A City: VP PrA-it3K"M Zip: 1 Alternate Phone: 61-X. 3a;1 9W Email: WV -E • SK'ktV,41! �j t, c. o 1 hereby apply for a permit and acknowledge that the infonfation above is complete and ac at the work will be in conformance with the ordinances of the City of Orono andZT e re Codes- stand this is only an application for a permit and work is not to start without a permit. 'cis ate Permit Approved By: Date Approved: (Turd P=it 05/04/11) Special Event Permit Application City of Orono s�A. %2750 Kelley Parkway ❑ Fee: $50.00 P.O. Box 66 ❑ Fee: $200.00 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ❑ Double Fee (application received less than 10 business days prior to event) Date Received: Objective: To ensure the health, safety and welfare of the communi Type of Special Event (check all that apply) ❑ Activity which generates parking needs ❑ Live Music - Noise Exemption for more than 20 vehicles off site ❑ Marathon Event ❑ Block Party ❑ Parachute Jump ❑ Carnival ❑ Parade of Homes/Home Tours ❑ Circus ❑ Street Parade ❑ Commercial/Movie Shoot ❑ Theatrical Performance or Exhibits ❑ Fishing Contest ❑ Use of Public Property ❑ Hot Air Balloon Event 2r Private Event ta( Otto "04%, Lar a Assembly involving more than 300 people at one time - $200.00 Fee ❑ Gathering, or projected gathering, of more than 300 persons at one time and at a single location Applicant Information Name: kvowt - � �&Dm Arm -%r LAY -E M1PPGWo6JV#t Address: 1 %P44- :5Jft%gu.M ,Dqk. City, State, Zip: IJP erp,*'� rA 0 5 Phone: Ct53L - do b�a•3sa` o L�k.E sTe Email: Lam 's-rokt2 Q»�tQt�ali , c�r�1 Organization (if applicable): VAI(el Nita 4-A EYbr—kA Address: / 14 H City, State, Zip: W �1 ? t�►'sl4 lrilbJ ��� Phone: SrSa --4% rf497i Event Details Name of Event: t4n, S iaawr cvnDvJ r-. e�4JL !gOC&I5 SLw Location: 1'444 1kv Date(s): Hours: M- F 43 930 - 6 WA S�er is %30.14 VA Applicant Phone # on Event Day: b ta►. J&a-`too 16 Title and Brief Description of Event: Use additional paper if necessary. I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. IN CONSIDERATION of being allowed to participate in the above-described event the undersigned hereby releases, waives, discharges, and covenants not to sue the City of Orono, the City's elected officials, employees, volunteers, or agents rReleasees') for injuries, death, or damages caused by the negligence of Releasees as a result of participating in the above- described event. The undersigned further agrees to protect, indemnify, and hold harmless Releasees from any and all damages, liability, and costs, including attorney's fees, for injuries, death, or damages caused by the negligence of Releasees. This Release and Indemnification does not apply to intentional, will, or wanton acts by Releasees. The applicant for a parade, a special event, or a private event permit shall pay a service charge for the governmental services provided to enforce the Orono City Code related to es and Special Events, and the city may, as a condition of approval of the pe it, require that the applica t oney with the city in a sum equal to the estimated service charge to be incurred by the i .Service arges includ city st time or city consultant time necessary. The City may certify to the County Audit any unpaid char which sha! be collected together with property taxes levied against the property. Signature Date GCOA) )esi' °,°o) p's -Uto4AL Special Event Permit Application (continued) Snbnuttals-. Please give consideration to the following list of documents and/or permits which may be required prior to City and Council approval. The application should be submitted at least 14 days prior to the event. Documents [Z Site plan identifying buildings, driveways, local streets, parking locations, temporary structures (include size), temporary restrooms, or any cordoned off area(s) for special events ❑ Proposed parade route or location of event ❑ - Signature of the owner of the property on which the special event is to be held. ❑ Approval of Homeowners Association if the event affects private property where a Homeowners Association has been established. ❑ Proof of written notice to all property owners within 350 feet of the location on which a special event is to be held at least 10 days prior to the event. The notice must contain the date, time, and location of the special event. ❑ Shuttle bus service will be required for all Parade of Homes/Home Tours unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Shuttle bus plan to be included with application. ❑ Proof of possession of any license or permit which, under federal, state or local laws or regulations, the applicant is required to have in order to conduct the parade or special event, or which, under any such law or regulation, would exempt the applicant from the licensing requirements of Orono City Code Sec. 66- 223. ❑ A policy or certificate of insurance on which the city, its agents and employees, are additional insureds, providing public liability insurance. providing umbrella or all perils coverage in the amount of $12000,000.00. Licenses/Permits Lif applicable) ❑ DNR ❑ Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) ❑ Fireworks ❑ Peddler, Solicitor or Transient Merchant ❑ Fire Department (Fire Marshal) ❑ Temporary Sign ❑ Gambling m Building Permit (temporary structure, i.e. tent) ❑ Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol ❑ Vendor License ❑ Health Department (County) ❑ Other -❑ Temporary Liquor License (State and Local) — Any time alcohol is served or sold to the general public, or if alcohol is sold at a private partylevent-even if included in ticket price. May only be issued to a club, charitable, religious, or non-profit organization, or political committee registered -under state law. Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on the application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. If you refuse to supply the information, the permit or license may not be issued. For Office Use Only Review by Administration: ❑ Approved ❑ Denied ❑: NA Review by Building & Zoning: ❑ Approved ❑ Denied ❑ NA Review by Fire Marshal: ❑ Approved ❑ Denied ❑ NA Review by Police Department: ❑ Approved ❑ Denied ❑ NA By: By: By= By: W:VApplications, license or Permit Applications)\Special Event Permit Application 06-15_doc Please answer the following questions related to this special event permit application. PARTICIPANTS/GUESTS Approximately how many people are expected at event? 3010" ? Is this event open to the public? ® Yes ❑ No Is public property used for the event? ❑ Yes IN No If yes, include copy of Certificate of Insurance showing coverage of the event, i.e. marathons, parades. PARKING Approximately how many vehicles are expected? b On -Site Parking: How many vehicles could be parked on the property? to Off -Site Parking: How many vehicles would need to be parked off the property? List location(s) of off-site parking: Describe method(s) of transporting guests/participants of event from off-site parking: Submit written permission for parking from property or business owner(s). LIVE MUSIC Will there be live music? ❑ Yes ® No Will there be amplified music? ❑ Yes 10 No What are the proposed hours for music to be played? Attach a sketch indicating direction/location of music in relationship to property. LIQUOR Will liquor be served at the event? ❑ Yes ® No If liquor is served, will there be a charge? ❑ Yes ® No Is liquor included with the price of a ticket to attend the event? ❑ Yes ® No FEES BEING CHARGED Will the event have any fees collected? ❑ Yes ® No Will there be any tickets sold for the event? ❑ Yes 0 No What is the purpose for any money that is collected? FIREWORKS Will there be fireworks at your event? ❑ Yes Q No Describe location for proposed display of fireworks: VENDORS / OR ATTRACTIONS Will vendors be coming to the event to sell food or other products? ❑ Yes ® No Permit required from Hennepin County. Will you have any other attractions? (Ex: Petting Zoo, Carnival) ❑ Yes ® No Attach list of attractions and map of locations PRIVATE EVENTS Will any special services be required from the Police Department or any other city department? ❑ Yes !] No Describe the required services: LARGE EVENTS Will there be more than 300 participants? ❑ Yes In No Please provide a site map of the event parking, location of music, attractions, tents, sanitary facilities, garbage containment, etc. Must meet requirements of Orono Code Sec. 38-802. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ■ If you are having an event that has less than 300 people, no music, no fireworks, no off-site parking, not charging for liquor and is not one of the types of special events listed at the beginning of this application, a special events permit may not be required. ■ The City recommends notification to the neighbors so that they are aware of the event, and to help prevent any event -related complaints. / CD �2 RIv rva!!e Power and Spoa Exhibit |q C n CD \\§\. 2a$< Cl) fEo §/CD 2so gam= WIG [k k] o/ CD SD. c2L \�/e� E9ER 10 CD / 10 _ :3 CD /�§ >] / £/ /ƒ \CD � � � »%%- -0 =3 " 0 {a 22°G \)\2 & \ CD CD � 0 0 CDe � � � � � � � � cD o�G� o � Q "0 7c cn10ov aCDU< —3�m CD m cn (D - m x CD --i FN a � y w N N � 6 J CD m O. C_ 3 m - m -41 rm 3 m C / Q (OD 0 C) A , O co 7 = O Cyd CD m v N CD NCD CD Cf) CD CD T. t i 47 m a r mm 3 ar, c v cncn cn `. 3 m CD aCD M s i -ipj W O _D J Cl) J CO O IJ2. o.a (D _ ~^ 3 -m0« CD s O _ _44_ cn µi17 CD (D cn 7!! _ a S Ao �g 4 ; pG - F! A 1Cw 6b'+3a 4'e CD \ 14 ED 0 cn �+7P � c_ RE River Valley Power and Sport Exhibit C Parking Requirements at 1440-1444 Shoreline Drive Tent Required Parking at 1440-1444 Shoreline 26 13 Summer Winter Rivervalley Sports 1444 Shoreline 4400 sq ft (x .75) 8 81 Your Boat Club 1444 Shoreline 20 slips 12 2 Browns Bay Marina 1444 Shoreline 77 slips 46 9.2 Residence 1 1442 Shoreline 1 Residential 2 2 Residence 2 1440 Shoreline 1 Residential 2 2 Tent 1444 Shoreline 3200 Sq ft 3 Total Parking Required 70 18 Provided Parking at 1440-1444 Shoreline (based on 2011 CUP) 1444 Shoreline Paved, marked 1440-1442 Shoreline gravel, unmarked Browns Bay side of CR 15 gravel, unmarked 1442 Shoreline triangular area, gravel, unmarked Verified Summer Winter "legal" 24 3 Tent 26 26 13 26 26 17 5 5 5 81 60 35 mom 5 NIN SEOTIOTH NL11 OF 7.04 RERj MENT LOT _ -- A4 HE I 1 A7 MEINOEn "I'lONNMENT ;T -- — 4\ 5t �15T1NG A BU0.pING t1 b^n •0� eapfR Gg®k3P x x9` �USZIN G "- � BU1lA1N 4.!'J tilt_= Rivervalley Sports Exhibit D NORTH SHORE MARINA DOCK LAYOUT m I j I GRC 2 \ UNE \ P FppT S�gpGK ®- — 13 14 \ \ g — 11 12 " \ ov�prao�.r+o P EN`EfaID NO.1 N Opel S 00. rn+o _ — V 6 11555S 4-, 60 I Q V 76 71x J� V q 1 \ _ roP E R x• .ly rf ° 7, ,;', NbT ,• 22 21 L 4 \ 2 23 \� �• 25 I ki�S 4 38L P U5 1,, I -- gU1LDIN fl P P'ti e- x- 5 R �. � T R7� p04 yQ( cn -6 1 1 pE R -0 %r 1 � �?� lef0➢7R�EMENi PpR _�1a't�--i--r&+� b i r' � � � C GR®vp , 1 1 �-- � "73 `? F4ti F _ 1 ANG ___--- S,7'0 _ Qp3tK1NG �� _ HW' LY DEO ��R�4�AroOF `�(/�J S J 29 3° � lam' 39 2D� 8 x• xe ® \\ 5150 40 1 ® 49 4A g I 52 2.I 'f 4S ® 42 I� 53 ® 4i x43 04 54 ���0 55 xe 46 ® ® 58 45 1 `0ro 56 m `'j0 FOGT S�BAGK I x FEB 2 2 2005 By w -- gU1LDIN fl P P'ti e- x- 5 R �. � R I G " O e10D>2R �SEAIfM 1 pE R 1 lf��f "DS �RyWe Sf"JiCf .IC -� 1196 15 1 v.c qg 3L � "73 `? F4ti F _ 1 ANG ___--- S,7'0 _ Qp3tK1NG �� _ HW' LY DEO ��R�4�AroOF `�(/�J S J 29 3° � lam' 39 2D� 8 x• xe ® \\ 5150 40 1 ® 49 4A g I 52 2.I 'f 4S ® 42 I� 53 ® 4i x43 04 54 ���0 55 xe 46 ® ® 58 45 1 `0ro 56 m `'j0 FOGT S�BAGK I x FEB 2 2 2005 By • • `'• /[ amp -- P" ® S % p• r ' 1 ��"ti o 0 CAP 'so .SO ! ► ( o AM 7 • . r I - �}� Are vv y �/ .1 i`� • N - �• � •• ��'• , . t. - • 1,�` � •fir. ��Y�[�jq /'� •\ ,' l �•� •• •�: i .� •'ia.�•, s+� • � _� f r 1�•'1 tt: �! i� %�1 !�•r . T� � ' • `' '�• /Y+�-�� I - 1 • 1/• •j•:y�' �7/ fie, d ��/ • � � •` "'�G'' .: .'. •: •h•.'� � •/fir �-'�4;1i �.�'�r '� • • Ir�1'SI A ' '1 'f �J' ""a,✓�' P6.."C V•C1ti IIsi •l• � ��• ri.: _ti::11.',ll:•';;!{r1�.�'ll��'� :r;G��l' I�"Jk'i:'t ' 'O ,• - .. '--ice ,' 4 •I' S POS ! r"V. j•"',`. �I°� :/ -IN 6; i ��'•';; •: :l �•. `' �.. �� � � '',. a: c•_ ► 'L/�f If•�i .Q�r% • • �"T :� •y r .�jJ'.CJ:7! .,�, ••! � J 1: '!ti ; • : � '' W - '. !`•'. ... �`-`` Cy«..�� •Ecco,[ Fi-E'J. 9S.•f • �tt';� .. • - � � I ► �. . ' - ',j�•••.���� . I� ,;,;r ' �Z ,�, l� ft Y;� � •} - . • _ 4P•Krr.1Go• P • . � '�•r '' :�' `;�r; :'" �,�:•�'''�j'':zfc,•.; � o, .. � .. „ f-'— �-------•-•---• _•., '/ . - ' . • • 1 � �'` - � +� '• � i'14,�-111•• ,�� �:; �: -, t`` t• t`• , 91.8 eiz Ji :� ! •- r• f , .. • � •' •• �rF:j Jai+..��.'.� . y, .1: �)) +• �r���.h 1 �,�. jl ti' `�`a •`� • � � ,� "'� ' 1 e •t .- t , a.L,• � •'its :qtr T `� .q � �' / t. - is i ( •s V t aY. •. ► � .•� i+ .'r r . r �� D _ d oa u q a 00 cz iW— W6 oo RAW ............ .................. .... ........ ............... . 10. Ao� 05LO r34 ro47 ?.3 826.27 CA m Ln e. e ;OFkl r- olp Of SaJvtd tt ve(5 Figure 1. Typical Sound Levels Rivervalley Sport Exhibit E SOURCE OF SOUND SOUND LEVEL PERCIEVED RELATIVE SOUND dB (A) LOUDNESS ENERGY Threshold of Pain Military Jet Take -off @ 50 ft. 130 126 10,000.000 Turbo -fan Aircraft Take -off Q 200 tt. 120 64 1,000,000 Dearening Rock Band ) 110 32 100,000 r B-737, DC -9-10 100 A 16 --10,000— @ 300 ft. on approach Very Loud F—Motorcycle @ 25 ft. 90 8 1,000 r Busv Street 80 4--100— 100 L Interior of 70 2 10 Department Store r Ordinary Conversation A Q 3 ft. 60 1 1 Moderate Quiet Auto D_ SO 1/2 .1 @ Low SpeedCity Dwelling - Indoors — 40Country +1/4 Dwelling - Indoors 308 .001 r Rustle or Leaves 20 1/16 .001 Very Faint 10 1/32 .0001 0 --1/64 .00001 Threshold of Hearing Source: Cabman A—W., Inc.. Mash Plan Update and Na E.M.— hhq, C:va,r. Pm[ Columbus Im... fl ... I Airport. tion before adapting any of the models provided here. There is one other issue that a community that wants to use these models will need to address. One of the most serious problems in establishing a noise overlay zone is that it may need to be incorporated in more than one jurisdiction. Airport noise effects are usually regional in nature, as are the economic development opportunities presented by the airport. There may be great pressure on individual communi- ties to not "buy into" the zoning because to do so may either limit the types of uses possible in the overlay area or require the retrofitting of existin usesand new types of construction standards for new de� elop- ment. In all, the zoning may mean that the airport environs might not be built out to its maximum potential or that it might be more costly to do so. This report, based on a document produced by the Mid -Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) under contract to Port Columbus International Airport, was undertaken due to the fact that the operations of Port Columbus were affecting the communities of Bexley, Columbus, Gahanna, Reynoldsburg, Whitehall, Jackson Township, and Franklin County. Those communities were able to work together through NIORPC to issue the docu- ment and will continue to have to work together to \ 3 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 15 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Authorization of Disbursement of City Funds for Claims Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda City Administrator's Finance Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to authorize the Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims that would normally be approved at the 2nd meeting in December. 2. Background. Typically during the month of December the City has only one council meeting. The meeting which would fall on or near the Christmas holiday is cancelled. Staff is requesting authorization to process a normal claims processing for the canceled meeting. This practice is routinely done in December with the Council then formally approving the claims at the first meeting in January of the following year. Without this authorization, no claims would be processed from December l I' to January Stn, this would make it difficult to comply with State Stature 471.425 requiring prompt payment of claims. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends authorizing the Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims received for the December 25' council meeting prior to formal approval at the January 8, 2018 council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims received for the December 25th council meeting which has been canceled, and that such paid claims be presented for formal approval at the January 8, 2018 council meeting. Prepared By: Jg1W Reviewed By: j1ja Approved By: -19 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 16 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: 2017 Interfund Loan and Transfers Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda City Administrator's Finance Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2017 Interfund Loan and Transfers. 2. Background. Each year the Council is requested to authorize transfer of monies between funds. These transactions fall into the following categories: A. Budgeted Transfers — Items designated in that year's budget when originally adopted for the purpose of providing support from one fund to another. B. Fund Obligations — i. Payments from one fund to another to reimburse expenses incurred by one fund on behalf of another. This is generally for City portions of special assessments, or for equipment capital outlay. ii. Loan payments from one fund to another. Loans are generally made to construction funds for the purpose of payment of expenses incurred prior to the sale of bonds and the levying of special assessments. In addition certain loans are necessary to fund major undertakings when the fund incurring the expense does not have adequate cash flow available to complete the project. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the 2017 Interfund Loan and Transfers as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the 2017 transfers and loan payments as presented on the attached schedule. Exhibits Exhibit A. Schedule of 2017 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments Prepared By: JJ6 Reviewed By: 5b Approved By: -19X Schedule of 2017 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments From Fund To Fund Amount Purpose General Imp & Equip Outlay $ 250,000 Annual operating transfer for capital equipment purchases, as budgeted. General 2014 Improvement Bond $ 125,000 Annual transfer for debt service of 2014 Bonds Improvement Bonds Water Operating 2008 Street $ 55,000 Annual operating transfer for debt Reconstruction Bond service support of Water Fund portion of the Casco Point Project. Sewer Operating 2008 Street $ 100,000 Annual operating transfer for debt Reconstruction Bond service support of Sewer Fund portion of the Casco Point Project. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 17 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: 2018 Compensation for Non — Union Employees Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda City Administrator's Finance Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to adopt a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2018. 2. Background. The City adopts an updated non-union pay scale annually. With the formation of two new unions, this action will set the 2018 wage and benefits for the following positions: Office Manager (PD), Deputy Chief, City Clerk, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Finance Director, Police Chief, and the City Administrator. This action will also set the 2018 wage for the Building Official. However this position's membership in the Administrative union is still being determined. If the position is included in the bargaining group, the wage and benefits will be set by the union contract which is still being negotiated. a. Compensation. The 2018 budget has includes a 2.5% COLA increase to the City's pay scale. A copy of the updated pay scale is included with this memo. b. Insurance. For 2018 the City's insurance contribution for employees selecting family (employee plus) coverage is budgeted for $1,330 which is an increase of $75 over 2017. The contribution for employees selecting single coverage remains frozen at the 2011 amount of $915. The waiver amount decreases to $300.50. c. Mileage. The attached resolution also confirms that the City will continue to reimburse employees at the IRS allowed mileage rate in 2018. The 2017 IRS standard rate is currently set at 53.5 cents per mile. The 2018 rate has not yet been released. d. Safety Shoe Allowance. This reimbursement will be increased by $25 to $200 annually. 3. Cost. The total cost of a 2.5% COLA is $23,775. This cost is shared between the General Fund ($21,074) and the Enterprise Funds ($2,701.00) The increased insurance contribution adds a total of $5,912 which is also split with $4,500 going to the General Fund and $1,412 going to the Enterprise Funds. Only one employee is covered by the shoe allowance, so this cost is only $25. 4. Funding. The funding for these expenditures are included in the 2018 budget. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2018. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2018. Exhibits Exhibit A. Resolution Exhibit B. Updated Non -Union Pay Scale Prepared By: `Jr J Reviewed By: _TJa Approved By: _T)a CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION CITY EMPLOYEES FOR 2018 WHEREAS, the City Administrator is responsible for annually presenting pay adjustments for City employees, with the exception of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been appropriated in the proposed 2018 Annual Budget to fund the recommended pay adjustments and such other matters of compensation as herein specified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Orono City Council as follows: 1. That the City's non-union pay scale be increased by 2.5% to reflect a Cost of Living increase. 2. That the City's cafeteria benefit plan contribution remain at $1,330 per month for employees on family coverage, $915 for single (no cash) and $300.50 for waivers. 3. That City employees using their own vehicles for approved work related business shall be compensated at a rate allowed by the IRS (currently $0.535 per mile). 4. That the 2018 Safety Shoe Reimbursement will remain increase to $200 for employees that qualify for this reimbursement. Adopted by the Council this 11th day of December, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO NON-UNION EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN POSITION GRADES Grade Point Range Positions in Grade 1 0-76 2 77-89 3 90-103 4 104-113 5 114-127 6 128-143 7 144-164 8 165-186 9 187-233 Office Manager (E) 10 234-299 City Clerk (E) 11 300-345 12 346-398 Building Official (E) 13 399-458 14 459-517 Deputy Chief (E) 15 518-647 Community Development Director (E) 16 648-843 Public Works Director/City Engineer (E); Finance Director (E) 17 844-970 Police Chief (E) 18 971-1068 19 1069-1176 City Administrator (E) (E) = Exempt Compensation Plan Non -Union Employees Pay Grades and Steps For 2018 BUDGET Grade Start Step 1 Step 2 S ep 3 S ep 4 S ep 5 S ep 6 S ep 7 Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourl Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual 1 16.10 33,484.76 16.596 34,520.37 17.11 35,588.01 17.64 36,688.68 18.18 37,823.38 18.75 38,993.17 19.33 40,199.15 19.92 41,442.42 2 17.13 35,622.09 17.66 36,723.80 18.20 37,859.59 18.76 39,030.51 19.35 40,237.64 19.94 41,482.10 20.56 42,765.05 21.20 44,087.68 3 18.22 37,895.84 18.78 39,067.87 19.36 40,276.16 19.96 41,521.82 20.58 42,806.00 21.22 44,129.89 21.87 45,494.74 22.55 46,901.79 4 19.38 40,314.72 19.98 41,561.56 20.60 42,846.98 21.24 44,172.14 21.89 45,538.29 22.57 46,946.69 23.27 48,398.65 23.99 49,895.52 5 20.62 42,888.00 21.26 44,214.43 21.91 45,581.89 22.59 46,991.64 23.29 48,444.99 24.01 49,943.29 24.75 51,487.93 25.52 53,080.34 6 21.94 45,625.53 22.61 47,036.63 23.31 48,491.38 24.03 49,991.11 24.78 51,537.23 25.54 53,131.16 26.33 54,774.39 27.15 56,468.45 7 23.34 48,537.80 24.06 50,038.96 24.80 51,586.57 25.57 53,182.03 26.36 54,826.83 27.17 56,522.51 28.01 58,270.63 28.88 60,072.81 8 24.82 51,635.96 25.59 53,232.95 26.38 54,879.33 27.20 56,576.63 28.04 58,326.43 28.91 60,130.34 29.80 61,990.04 30.72 63,907.25 9 26.41 54,931.87 27.23 56,630.80 28.07 58,382.27 28.94 60,187.91 29.83 62,049.39 30.75 63,968.44 31.71 65,946.85 32.69 67,986.44 10 28.10 58,438.16 28.96 60,245.53 29.86 62,108.80 30.78 64,029.69 31.74 66,009.99 32.72 68,051.53 33.73 70,156.22 34.77 72,326.00 11 29.89 62,168.26 30.81 64,090.98 31.77 66,073.19 32.75 68,116.69 33.76 70,223.39 34.81 72,395.24 35.88 74,634.27 36.99 76,942.55 12 31.80 66,136.44 32.78 68,181.90 33.79 70,290.62 34.84 72,464.56 35.92 74,705.73 37.03 77,016.22 38.17 79,398.16 39.35 81,853.77 13 33.83 70,357.92 34.87 72,533.93 35.95 74,777.26 37.06 77,089.96 38.21 79,474.18 39.39 81,932.14 40.61 84,466.13 41.86 87,078.48 14 35.99 74,848.85 37.10 77,163.76 38.25 79,550.27 39.43 82,010.59 40.65 84,547.00 41.90 87,161.86 43.20 89,857.58 44.54 92,636.68 15 38.28 79,626.44 39.47 82,089.11 40.69 84,627.95 41.94 87,245.31 43.24 89,943.62 44.58 92,725.38 45.96 95,593.18 47.38 98,549.67 16 40.73 84,708.97 41.99 87,328.83 43.28 90,029.73 44.62 92,814.16 46.00 95,684.70 47.43 98,644.02 48.89 101,694.86 50.40 104,840.06 17 43.32 90,115.93 44.66 92,903.01 46.05 95,776.31 47.47 98,738.47 48.94 101,792.24 50.45 104,940.44 52.01 108,186.03 53.62 111,531.98 18 46.09 95,868.01 47.52 98,833.00 48.99 101,889.70 50.50 105,040.93 52.06 108,289.62 53.67 111,638.78 55.33 115,091.52 57.04 118,651.06 19 49.03 101,987.24 50.55 105,141.49 52.11 108,393.29 53.72 111,745.67 55.39 115,201.72 57.10 118,764.65 58.86 122,437.79 60.68 126,224.52 rolson\spreadsheets\asst\wages\Paysteps Non -Union AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 18 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: 2018 Fee Schedule Presenter: Ron Olson, Finance Director Agenda City Administrator's Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider the 2018 fee schedule. 2. Background. The City updates its fee schedule annually. Fees for water, sewer, and storm water have been set based on a rate study completed in 2014. This rate study is being updated during 2018 and may lead to additional rate changes. The fee schedules utilizes the new format originally introduced in August with the Planning and Zoning changes, intended to group fees in like areas. The new format reduces the pages from 35 to 17. Proposed Utility Rate Changes • Municipal Sewer Rates. A 4% increase for the Utility Service Rates is recommended effective the 1St Quarter of 2018. The increases are necessary to cover system maintenance and infrastructure costs. • Municipal Water Rates. A 6% increase for the Municipal Water Rates to cover infrastructure needs. • Storm Water Rate. Storm Water fees are recommended to increase by 10% to accommodate maintenance needs. Other Proposed Fee Schedule Changes All changes are highlighted in yellow in the fee schedule exhibits. • Exhibit B, Planning and Zoning. The preliminary plat application went to $500.00 from $505.00 • Exhibit C, Licenses Fees. Prorated fees for licenses. After 75% of the license period is lapsed, the license fee is reduced by half, for new licenses. The general terms is used because some license terms are January to December, and some are April to March. • Exhibit E, Administrative Offenses. No changes at this time. • Exhibit F, Park Fees. Statements on proration and when passes will be sold are added. Non-resident and resident park use fees added. • Exhibit G, Police Administration Fireworks permits increased to $100.00, special event permits increased to $100, all from $50.00. • Exhibit H, Documents. Shipping and handling charges for hard data increased to 3.00 from $2.00. Returned check increased to $30.00 from $20.00 2. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. Prepared By: Reviewed By: 1b)X1 Approved By: �bV 5aj[9 AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consider a motion to adopt the attached Ordinance adopting the City's Fee Schedule for 2018 and Summary Ordinance for publication. Exhibits Exhibit A. Fee Schedule Ordinance Exhibit B. Fee Schedule Exhibits Prepared By: Reviewed By: lb),R Approved By: �bV 5aj[9 ORDINANCE NO. _ , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Council Exhibit A December 11, 2017 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2018 FEE SCHEDULE AND AN ORDIANNCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Ordinances Repealed. Ordinance No. , Third Series, entitled Amended 2017 Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. The City Council of Orono per Section 2-171 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the fees attached as Exhibits A -H effective during the calendar year 2018: SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance establishing the 2018 Fee Schedule shall be published as a Summary Ordinance and shall be effective on January 1, 2018 and publication. ADOPTED this 11th day of December, 2017 on a vote of ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2017. G. Police Admin Dogs at large Animals at large Large Assemble Permit Fireworks Firearms Trapping Special Events False Alarm Fingerprinting Police Special Services Copy Service Photos No Parking signs Statements Fire arm storage H. Documents Zoning documents Administrative documents 2018 Orono Fee Schedule Exhibit A Table of Contents B. Planning, Building, C License Fees D. Utility Fees E. Admin Offenses F. Park Fees and Zoning Zoning Applications Commercial Marina Stormwater and Traffic/ Vehicle Golf Course Drainage Trunk Zoning Permits Join Use Dock Sanitary Sewer and Snowmobile Violations Lurton Park Municipal Water Connection Building Code Garbage Hauler Sewer Projects Animals Administration Building Permits Home Occupation Water Connections Public Nuisances Contractual Inspections Temporary Trailers and Water Meter and Horn Open Burning Buildings Fire Kennel Licenses Sewer and Water unit Noise adjustment charges Park Dedication Beer, Wine, and Liquor Utility Service Fees Park Violations Storm Water Trunk Amusement Devices Municipal Water Rates Sign Violations Public Dance Stormwater Utility Rates Juvenile Violations General Admin Recycling Charge Seasonal Overweight Vehicles Sump Pump Surcharge Parking PW supplies and service Miscellaneous G. Police Admin Dogs at large Animals at large Large Assemble Permit Fireworks Firearms Trapping Special Events False Alarm Fingerprinting Police Special Services Copy Service Photos No Parking signs Statements Fire arm storage H. Documents Zoning documents Administrative documents Exhibit B Buillding, Planning, and Zoning PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING All fees, unless otherwise noted, are application fees and are non-refundable after staff work has begun on the application. All after the fact applications are double fees. All applicants are responsible for actual costs incurred by the City by its' consultants in the review of the application. Application Ad]usted Fee Escrow Notes ZONING APPLICATIONS: Variance $275.00 $700.00 1st Extension $50.00 $700.00 Staff approved 2nd and subsequent $275.00 $700.00 City Council meeting Conditional Use Permit $275.00 $700.00 CUP amendment $275.00 $700.00 1st Extension $50.00 $700.00 Staff approved Site Plan Review $275.00 $700.00 Zoning Amendments including map amendments $275.00 $700.00 + Consultant fees Comprehensive Plan Amendment $275.00 $700.00 + Consultant fees Subdivision Subdivision: Sketch Plan $275.00 $1,000.00 Subdivision: Class I and II $275.00 $1,000.00 Subdivision: Class III Prel Plat -595 $500.00 $5,000.00 Subdivision: Final Plat $500.00 $2,500.00 Subdivision: Preliminary plat extension $350.00 Subdivision Exception $50.00 n/a Vacations Vacations: Road $275.00 $700.00 Vacation: Easement not associated with subdivisions $275.00 $700.00 Vacation: Easements associated with a subdivision $0.00 $700.00 Easement Creation (see Class I Subdivision) $700.00 Appeal of Administrative Decision $150.00 $700.00 ZONING PERMIT: Stairway to Lake $50.00 Structures not requiring a building permit $50.00 plus engineering costs Encroachment Permit/ Agreement $150.00 Tree removal in shore setback $0.00 Signs (Alteration of face, cabinent, or raceway) $50.00 Vehicle Storage $50.00 78-1577 (C) Land Alteration $50.00 $1,000.00 May also require a CUP City Administrator may require an erosion control $1,000.00 Variable depending on escrow for projects disturbing soils. project scope, but not to exceed Tent/ Canopy Permits $50.00 Application BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATION: Address Change Request by Owner Building Permits Plan Review Fee Minimum Fee Sign structure Entrance monuments Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Escrow City Administrator may require an erosion control escrow for projects disturbing soils. Valuation based on ICC 2012 Building Valuation tables Total Valuation $1.00 to $500 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up Demolition: Principal structure Demolition: Accessory structure Retaining walls Plumbing Backflow registration Plumbing minimum Mail -in postage and handling surcharge Mechanical (All Types) Adjusted Fee Escrow Notes $50.00 Based on Value Table 65% of Building Permit Fee $26.25 Based on Value Table Based on Value Table 3% of project value, not to exceed $10,000 $1,000.00 Fee $26.25 $26.25 for the first $500.00 plus $3.41 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $77.40 for the first $2,000.00 plus $15.49 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $433.67 for the first $25,000.00 plus $11.29 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $715.92 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.88 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $1109.92 for the first $100,000.00 plus $6.30 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $3,629.92 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $6,254.92 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $4.20 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof $100.00 $1,000.00 $50.00 Based on Value Table $1,000.00 May require CUP 1.25% of project n/a $10.00 $26.25 $2.00 1.25% of project n/a Application Mechanical Minimum Tent/ Canopy Mail -in postage and handling surcharge Municipal Connection permit Sewer SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) (MCES) Water Horn Mail -in postage and handling surcharge Septic Residential System Permit, Repair Residential System Permit, New/ replace Non -Residential System Permit Subdivision site evaluation review Inspection surcharge for RS zones (Big Island and Deering island) Reinspection fee Site inspection without permit Annual Septic Fee Septic Late Fee Contractural Inspection Service Monthly Retainer Fee (Includes clerical time) Inspection Charge Plan Review Charge Adjusted Fee $26.25 $50.00 $ 2.00 $50.00 $2,485.00 $50.00 Quote Basis $2.00 $100.00 $460.00 $260.00 $ 60.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $45.00/per year, plus late fee plus 8% interest for unpaid charges $10.00 $30/ month $30.00 per inspection Per 2008 Building Permit Fee Based on Valuation Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use is excessive) $20.00 per hour FIRE Fire Protection inspection Fire Code Permit certified Commercial Fire Alarm Per 2008 Building Permit Fee Based on Valuation Fire Plan review fee fee Fire Sprinkler Systems - Commercial Escrow Notes n/a $1,000.00 Per lot plus cost of boat rental if transportation not provided. plus 30/ hour after 1st hour Application Adjusted Fee Escrow Notes Burning permits No Charge Reinspection $20.00 PARK DEDICATION Land Dedication Minimum Area - Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (1) Residential/Agricultural/Multiple Residential Zoned Land. Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. (Exclusive of lot that includes an existing residence.) (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedicated requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds inequivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. The City Council has established by resolution a minimum residential park fee of $3,250 per dwelling unit and a maximum of $5,550 per dwelling unit. Res. 4738 (12-10-01) The City Council has established by resolution a minimum commercial/industrial park fee of $8,125 per acre and a maximum of $13,875 per acre. Res. 4739 (12-10-01) STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEES Storm water trunk fees apply to new development and NEW DEVELOPMENT LAND USE Trunk Fee per Acre Single Family Residential 5 Acre Zone $ 3,230.00 Single Family Residential 2 Acre Zone $ 4,030.00 Single Family Residential 1 Acre Zone $ 5,250.00 Single Family Residential 1/2 Acre Zone $ 6,050.00 Multi Family Residential 4 Units/Acre or Less $ 7,275.00 Multi Family Residential Greater than 4 Units/Acre $ 8,490.00 Commercial or Industrial $ 9,690.00 1. Trunk fee charged on per lot basis. For the 5 -acre, 2 -acre, 1 -acre and 1/2 -acre zoning districts, the trunk fee shall be charged on a per -lot basis. Only acreage platted as building lots shall be charged the trunk fee. Acreage platted as road -rights-of-way or out lots for other purposes shall not be charged the trunk fee. The dollar amount calculated by multiplying (a) the number of new lots by (b) the zoning district base acreage per lot by (c) the base trunk fee per lot established in the City Fee Schedule, shall be deemed the Base Development Trunk Fee. 2. Maximum fee. For the five -acre zoning district, any lot exceeding 5.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 5.0 acre parcel. Application Adjusted Fee Escrow Notes 3. Maximum fee. For the two -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 2.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 2.0 acre parcel. 4. Fee Credits. For the two -acre and five -acre zoning districts, a combined reduction of up to 50% of the Base - acreage of newly -created wetland. - acreage of stormwater ponding or similar - acreage of conservation easements resulting from S. Maximum fee. For the one -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 1.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 1.0 acre parcel. 6. Maximum fee. For the 1/2 -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 0.5 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 0.5 acre parcel. 7. Multi -family and High -Density Single Family Developments. Trunk fee shall be charged on a per -acre basis, exce that the following acreages will not be subject to the trunk fee: - all wetland acreage up to the delineation line - acreage of stormwater ponding or similar of conservation easements resulting from Exhibit C Licenses and Miscellaneous Charges License Fees for new licenses maybe prorated; after 75% of the license period has elapsed, the fee is reduced by 50%. Type Fee COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Initial Application Fee $300.00 Renewal Application & Inspection Fee $200.00 Late fee $100.00 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Initial Application Fee $50.00 Renewal Application Fee $20.00 Plus each slip $2.00 Late Fee $25.00 CANOE RACK RENTAL $40.00 Per Slip GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE Flat Rate $75.00 Per Hauler $15.00 Per Truck Transfer Fee $30.00 HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE (Level 2) $100.00 Initial Review Fee $30.00 Annual Review Fee TEMPORARY TRAILERS & BUILDINGS $30.00 KENNEL LICENSES Commercial Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) $150.00 Residential Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) $50.00 BEER, WINE & LIQUOR LICENSES Initial Investigation $500.00 Per License On -Sale & Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses On -Sale & Off Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor/Wine Licenses In state investigation Out state investigation Off -Sale Liquor License On -Sale Liquor License On -Sale Wine License 3.2 % Malt Liquor Off -Sale (Annual) 3.2 % Malt Liquor On -Sale (Annual) Setup (Annual) Club Liquor License (weekday) (Sunday) Temporary Set-up Permit (1-4 days) Temporary On Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor (1-7 days) Temporary Off -Sale Wine License (wine auction) Temporary On -Sale Wine License (1-4 days) Actual cost up to $10,000 Actual cost $150.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $50.00 $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 $25.00 Each $25.00 Each $25.00 Each $25.00 Each Ch. 54, Article III Sec. 26-76 Sec. 62-161 thru 62-185 Ch. 34, Article II Ch. 34, Article II Ch. 34, Article II Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-77 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-126; 34-143 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-66 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-82 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-42 Temporary On -Sale Liquor License (1-4 days) $25.00 Each Liquor Violations (3 years immediately prior to date of most current violation) 1st Violation $500.00 2nd Violation $1,000.00 & 3 -day license suspension 3rd Violation $2,000.00 & 2 -week license suspension 4th Violation License revocation AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Establishment (Annual) Per Machine Fee PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE Annual License Individual License GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSES/FINES Gambling & Raffle Investigation Massage Therapy License Background Investigation Annual Renewal Solicitor/Transient Merchant/Peddler License Tobacco Licenses $100.00 + Machine fee $25.00 Each $100.00 $10.00 $10.00 $100.00 $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 + Actual costs up to $1,500.00 $125.00 Licensee or Employee Violations within 24 month period 1st Offense $150.00 2nd Offense $400.00 3rd Offense & Over $500.00 Penalty for Use of Tobacco Where Prohibited $100.00 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-41 Sec. 38-601 thru 38-603 Sec. 38-501 thru 38-506 Ch. 38, Article II Ch. 31, Article II Ch. 30 Ch. 50, Article II Sec. 51-5 Exhibit D Utility Rates and Fees ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES Connection fees have been determined as a way to provide a fair and equitable recovery of the costs associated with providing water and wastewater utility services to new customers to avoid placing these costs on existing customers. The connection fee includes those portions of existing assets that will benefit new customers together with any anticipated future capital improvements constructed for the purpose of providing utility services to new customers. The connection charge applies to those properties not previously assessed for the associated utility project. MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT Fee Sewer $50.00 SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) (MCES) $2,485.00 Water $50.00 Horn Quote Basis Mail -in postage and handling surcharge $2.00 Connection inspection (Water or Sewer) $100.00 Disconnection inspection (Water or Sewer) $100.00 SEWER PROJECTS Connection to existing City Sewer System: $5,100.00 Connection to City Sewer in areas still within their assessment window (less than 15 years since project was assessed) shall pay a prorated amount equivalent to the assessment residences were charged at the time of the project: Connection to Sewer System in adjacent city Fee 2004 North Long Lake East Extension $14,610.00 2004 West Farm/Homestead $8,765.00 2005-1 Webber Hills/S Brown Rd Ext $13,280.00 2005-1 Dickey Lake Dr N Wayzata Fee Schedule 2006-1 Jamestown Road $14,110.00 2007 Farview Lane Sewer $10,650.00 Connection to Sewer System in adjacent city WATER CONNECTIONS Connection to existing City Water Main: $4,240 Connection to Water system in adjacent city Fee $1,900.00 or per current Long Connection to Long Lake Sewer System Lake Fee Schedule $632.00 $1,000 or per current Connection to Wayzata Sewer System Wayzata Fee Schedule WATER CONNECTIONS Connection to existing City Water Main: $4,240 Connection to Water system in adjacent city Fee $1,900.00 or per current Long Connection to Long Lake Water System Lake Fee Schedule $2,115 $2221.00 or per current Connection to Wayzata Water System Wayzata Fee Schedule WATER METER AND HORN 5/8" (3/4"x7-1/2") meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost 3/4" (3/4"x9") meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost 1" meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost Larger meter Actual Cost SEWER AND WATER UNIT ADJUSTMENT CHARGES CHARGES Charges shall result from either an intensification of an existing non-residential use or a new non- residential use that replaces a former use on a property located within an area already assessed and served by municipal sewer and water. CREDIT Credit for previously assessed sewer or water units shall be applied against the total number of sewer and water units established for the new use. UNIT CHARGE Each sewer and each water unit adjustment charge shall be equal to the current Service Availability Charge established by the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services or its successor and shall be payable to the City of Orono upon application for a building permit. UTILITY SERVICE FEES Municipal Sewer Rate By Unit: 1st 2nd By flow: Long Lake Service Base Fee Flow Wayzata Service Metered Service Base Charge Flow Unmetered Service Per property t,� $150.78/per quarter c"�- $133.26/per quarter 5 $5.56/1000 gallon plus c,� $14.41/per quarter/per connection c'� $22.50/per quarter $6:49 $6.75/1000 gallon c'� $22.50/per quarter $6-49 $6.75/1000 gallon $172.54/per quarter Some Properties on Mytlewood and Old Long Lake Road are not connected to water. Wayzata bills Orono based on a quarterly usage of 25,000 gallons. Charge is based on the metered rates and 25,000 gallons. MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Navarre Area (Area #1) and Hwy 12 (Area #2) Billing & Ready to Serve Chg c"� $45.11/qtr Water Usage Rate Residential Tier 1 (0-10,000 gal)1 $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (11-25,000 gal) $4.77 $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>25,000 gal) A16 $7.59/1000 gal Multi Family Tier 1 (0-50,000 gal)1 $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (51-150,000 gal) $4.77 $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>150,000 gal) A165 $7.59/1000 gal Commercial Tier 1 (0-50,000 gal)1 $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (51-150,000 gal) $4.77 $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>150,000 gal) A1C $7.59/1000 gal Unconnected Property Chg c"� $45.11/qtr ready to serve/hydrant chg) Chevy Chase Area (Area #3) Billing & Ready to Serve Chg c'� $28.86/qtr Water Usage Rate Residential Tier 1 (0-15,000 gal) $3,81 $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (16-25,000 gal) $4.77 $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>25,000 gal) A165 $7.59/1000 gal Federally Mandated Safe Drinking Water $6.36/year on second quarter billing Testing Program (Charged per service connection) Quarterly Service Charge for Non -Functioning or Inaccessible $50.00 Water Meter Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area Water Usage Rate $3,46 $3.67/1000 gallons Billing 4M $43.04 Bulk sale - All Others - $25.00 per location plus area rate per/1,000 gallons. i.e. Fill swimming pool or watering sod. Penalty for late payment of sewer/water bills - 8% after 30 days from billing date (applied to the total unpaid balance). Interest at 8% on unpaid water/sewer bills certified. Charge for Unpaid Accounts Certified for Assessment $25.00 Water Turn -On $50.00 Water Turn-off $50.00 Water System Repair/Replacement if damage caused by property owner: Labor - Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost STORM WATER UTILITY RATES The basic intent of storm water regulations is to minimize the impact of development on natural drainage One residential unit: c'� $22.13/per quarter Non-residential unit: Based on "Residential Equivalent Factor" RECYCLING CHARGE $36.00/year Recycling Cart from Waste Management No Charge SUMP PUMP SURCHARGE $100.00 per month PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES DFiveway Cull r+s OR6t£ ga4s (sale enly, Rat Right of Way Permit $50.00/permit Right of Way Escrow (for other than Public Utility) $1,500 New Street Intersections (See zoning section - Special improvement fees) 7C' E.1ey *ed- An+..nn-. T,,weF L n a „ /OneL.dI,- 1 W 1 lY -. r a .f -, ;; aL.1e) 1 5 n.,te. Ras 6 10 n„+e„„as On -Call Service to Other Cities Base On -Call Fee Call -Out Fee Water Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Wetland Buffer Signs $61.60/day Actual wage and equipment rates $8.00 Exhibit E Administrative Offenses ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES (POLICE ADMINISTERED) Applicable Code or MN State TRAFFIC/VEHICLE OFFENSES Fee Statute (MSS) Number Unsafe Operation 66-259 Unreasonable Acceleration $60.00 66-258 Exhibition Driving $60.00 66-7 Failure to Obey Traffic Control $60.00 169.06 MSS Expired Registration $60.00 169.79 MSS Unsafe Equipment $60.00 169.47 MSS Loud Exhaust $60.00 169.69 MSS No Driver License in Possession $60.00 171.08 MSS Failure to Change Address on DL $60.00 171.11 MSS Driving to Avoid Traffic Signal $60.00 66-5 SNOWMOBILE VIOLATIONS Operation $60.00 66-159 Equipment $60.00 66-160 Hours of Operation $60.00 66-159 ANIMALS $60.00 Dog at Large $60.00 62-104 Animal License Required $60.00 62-131 Feces Clean Up $60.00 22-95 & 22-114 Barking Dog $60.00 62-10 PUBLIC NUISANCES $60.00 Public Nuisance/General Prohibition $60.00 70-4 Peace and Safety Violation $60.00 70-166 Discharge of Firearm $60.00 70-97 OPEN BURNING No Permit $60.00 58-186 Negligent Burning $60.00 58-193 No Open Burning $60.00 58-193 NOISE Loud Noise Prohibited $60.00 58-120 PARK VIOLATIONS Hours of Operation $60.00 22-89 Operating a Motor Vehicle within Park $60.00 22-92 No Permit $60.00 22-102 Feces Clean Up $60.00 22-95, 22-102 & 22-114 SIGNS VIOLATIONS $60.00 Violation of General Provisions $60.00 18-4 JUVENILE $60.00 Curfew $60.00 70-274 Possession of Tobacco $60.00 609.685 Sub 3 MSS SEASONAL OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES 1,000-9,999 lbs overweight .15 cents 169.824 Sub 1 MSS per lb over PARKING General $25.00 66-78 Seasonal 0200-0600 on $25.00 66-80 Street Prohibited Handicapped $60.00 66-85 Fire Lane $25.00 46-85 MISCELLANEOUS Watering Restrictions $60.00 610.50 Sub 15 MSS Placing Snow on Street $25.00 18-5 Exhibit F Park Fees GOLF COURSE FEES - Effective Date: 2018 Season MONDAY THRU SUNDAY RATES Individual (Regular) $18.00 Juniors (12 -18 years old) $12.00 Seniors (60 years or older) $15.00 Second Round $9.00 Children under 12 golf free with an adult SEASON PASS RATES (Unlimited Play) Base Resident Individual Season Pass $500.00 $435.00 Junior Season Pass (12 - 18 years old) $299.00 $260.00 Senior Season Pass (60 years or older) $383.00 $330.00 Family Season Pass $590.00 $574.00 (Entire Family*) * Family meaning: Immediate family living in the same household. Children must be 18 years old or younger. GOLF CART RENTAL RATES Motorized Cart Rental/Per Round $16.50 Pull Carts/Per Round $3.00 Golf Clubs/Per Round $3.00 FALL RATES (Begins 1st Monday of October) 1st Nine Holes Fall $12.00 2nd Nine Holes Fall $5.00 Junior Fall (18 years or younger) $8.00 Senior Fall (60 years or older) $8.00 As Posted Resident $25.00 Non -Resident $40.00 Passes will go on sale for the following year on Nov 1st Passes to be prorated at 50% on August 1st. CANOE RACK RENTAL (Summit Beach) $40.00/slip PARK FACILITY USE PERMIT(Sports fields at Bederwood and Hackberry) Resident (Individual, business or group) $15.00 Non -Resident (Individual, business or group) $25.00 Exhibit G Police Administration DOGS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd Offense After Hours, Weekend & Holiday Release Charge ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) - RELEASE FEE 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT (over 300 people) FIREWORKS PERMIT Display of Fireworks/Pyrotechnic Special Effects Sale and/or Storage of Consumer Fireworks FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT Pest Control (limited use) Game Animals (limited use) Annual (Club Only) LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (Includes Parades, Noise Exemption, Use of Public Property) Fee is doubled if application is not received 10 business days prior to event $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $75.00 $55.00 $65.00 $75.00 $35.00 Per Hour $55.00 + 0.31/Mile (Total Distance) Actual Cost $200.00 + $60.00 each additional day; actual costs up to $1,500 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $20.00 Sec. 62-104 Ch. 62, Article I Sec. 38-801 thru 38-803 Sec. 70-99 Ch. 70, Article III Sec. 70-71 50.00 $100 Under 200 people Ch. 66, Article VI $200.00 If Over 200 people; actual costs up to $1,500 FALSE POLICE ALARM USER FEES 1st false alarm/per calendar year 2nd false alarm/per calendar year 3rd false alarm/per calendar year 4th false alarm/per calendar year 5th and over false alarm/per calendar year FALSE FIRE ALARM USER FEES 1st false alarm/calendar year 2nd false alarm/calendar year 3rd false alarm/calendar year 4th false alarm/calendar year 5th & over false alarm/calendar year Ch. 42, Article III No Charge $50.00 $100.00 $150.00 $250.00 Ch. 42, Article III No Charge $75.00 $250.00 $350.00 $500.00 Each Call FINGERPRINTING SERVICE $25.00 Per Application RESIDENTS ONLY (Citizenship No Charge) POLICE SPECIAL SERVICES (Officer 119 rate) Police Reserve Officers COPY SERVICE - Police Records First Two Copies Additional Copies More than 100 pages (actual costs) PHOTOS SIGNS: "NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE" Paper signs (no lath included) STATEMENTS FIREARM STORAGE FEES $100.00 Per Hour $25.00 Per Hour $0.25 Per Page $0.25 Each $10.00 On CD $1.00 $10.00 For CD & (transcribed copy or CD when available; subject to Data Privacy Act - will be charged an actual hourly fee) $50.00 Per Gun (Police Policy 3056) Ex H Documents and Services ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan Municipal Code Book - complete (Ch. 1-94 w/revisions) Municipal Code Book - Portions Ch 78 only (Zoning Code) w/revisions Ch 82 only (Subdiv. Code) w/revisions Other Individual Chapters Binder Comp. Plan Amendment 42 (Hwy 12) GIS and City Maps Black & white Color City Street Number Maps Building & Planning Publications GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS Listing Information Assessment Search - Written (Verbal searches not given) Fax Charge Copy Service (for public City records only) 11" x 17" copies Individual copies of Ordinance Sections (1 copy) Reprint of Oversized Documents that have been microfilmed Building Plan Copies Labels from Utility Billing System Electronic Labels Information Provided on CD Information Provided on DVD Shipping/ Handling mailing of requested information Surcharge for Staff Expense in Excess of Regular Fees Professional Time Clerical Time Legal/Engineering Consultants $75.00 $60.00 With Binder $25.00 loose $15.00 loose $ .25 Per Page $5.00 $5.00 8 1/2 x 11 11x17 17x22 22x34 $0.25 $1.00 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 $4.00 $8.00 $16.00 $0.25 $2.00 $5.00 As Posted - Prices subject to Change $10.00 $20.00 Per Parcel No charge up to 6 pages; $.25 Each Additional $ .25 Each $ 1.00 Each No Charge Cost of copying service, Cost of Copying, Messenger Service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 (Entire amount to be paid upon request) $ .05 Per Label (Approximately $150.00) $10.00 Per sheet , 30 Labels max per sheet $ 10.00 Per CD $ 20.00 Per DVD $ 3.00 + cost of information (DVD, pages, etc.) $ 50.00 Per Hour $ 30.00 Per Hour Actual Billed Cost Mileage/Copies/Postage/Etc. Actual Cost Returned Check Charge $30.00 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 19 Date: December 11, 2017 Item Description: Resolution Opposing Change to the Administration of the County Crime Lab Without Consultation with Communities Affected by the Change Presenter: Dustin Rief, City Administrator Agenda City Administrator's Section: Report Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval of the resolution opposing change to the administration of the county crime lab without consultation with communities affected by the change. 2. Background. The Hennepin County commissioners will be voting whether or not to change how the county crime lab is managed. They are scheduled to take up the issue on December 12, 2017. A resolution has been prepared in opposition of the proposed change to the administration of the county crime lab without consultation with communities affected by the change. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the resolution as presented. Exhibit Exhibit A. Resolution Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: -1V Approved By: -1V CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION OPPOSING CHANGE TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COUNTY CRIME LAB WITHOUT CONSULTATION WITH COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY THE CHANGE WHEREAS, the City of Orono has always had consistent excellent service from the Hennepin County Sheriffs Crime Lab; and WHEREAS, a proposal has been introduced to change the management of the crime lab to a new department management by County Administration; and WHEREAS, there has not been discussion with the affected cities regarding who would be controlling the Crime Lab, what types of changes might result from this change, who would be responding to process crime scenes, or what changes would take place regarding procedures and priorities; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment states that combining the Minneapolis and Hennepin County Sheriff s Crime Lab would help reduce backlogs in criminal cases and would allow for more comprehensive and complete forensic services, but does not state how or why this change would reduce backlogs or detail what increase in services cities would expect; and WHEREAS, the proposal establishes a new department called Forensic Crime Services with added positions of a director and manager at additional cost without indication of whether this would actually add efficiency or create another level of bureaucracy; and WHEREAS, the report supporting the change indicates only consultation with the City of Minneapolis and to our knowledge there has been no consultation with the Hennepin County Police Chiefs; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono is not opposed to looking at ways to improve Crime Lab services to our community, though we are not convinced that these changes would be beneficial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: that the City of Orono is opposed to the proposed change to the administration of the County Crime Lab at this time given that we have not had any consultation and have not been provided any evidence that such change would CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. improve our level of service. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: WHEREUPON SAID RESOLUTION WAS DECLARED DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017. Dennis Walsh, Mayor IIN]"MW Anna Carlson, City Clerk