Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-13-2017 Council Packet
Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, November 13, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda 1. Consent Agenda - Consent agenda items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under this section of the agenda. Items on the Consent Agenda are reviewed in total by the City Council and may be approved through one motion with no further discussion by the Council. Any item may be removed by any Council Member, staff member or person from the public for separate consideration. The City Council may add agenda items to be considered as part of the Consent motion. If you wish to remove any item from the Consent Agenda, please state the item number and description of the item. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Consent Agenda 2. Council Meeting Minutes of October 23, 2017 3. Council Work Session Minutes of October 23, 2017 4. Claims/Bills 5. Proposed 2018 Official Calendar 6. Proposed 2018 Council Liaison to Planning Commission Meetings in 2018 7. Resolution Designating Polling Places for 2018 State Primary and State General Election 8. Public Works Maintenance Worker Appointment 9. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Adoption 10. Pay Request #6 for Well #4 - Final 11. #17-3966 - LDK Builders o/b/o Linda Tamosuinas, 1525 Long Lake Blvd, Variances - Resolution 12. #17-3972 - Jan Gasterland, 1920 Shadywood Road, Variance - Resolution 13. #17-3974 - SML Electric o/b/o Bridgewater Bank, 2445 Shadywood Road Variance - Resolution 14. #17-3975 - Kelly Hanson, 1284 Wildhurst Trail, CUP - Resolution 15. #17-3978 - Alexander Design Group o/b/o Travis Hansberger, 1720 Shadywood Road Variance - Resolution Public Comments - (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Public Hearing 16. #17-3984 - City of Orono Text Amendment: Rental Licensing, Vacation Rental Prohibition Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, November 13, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Public Works/City Engineer Report 17. Big Island Planning 18. McCulley Road Brush Site Fencing Planning Department Report 19. #17-3987 -John Kraemer & Sons o/b/o Ellen Redmond, 2625 Kelly Avenue, ATF CUP (grading) - Resolution 20. #17-3985 -City of Orono Text Amendment Personal Watercraft Regulations on Long Lake 21. #17-3977 - Brian Benson and Chuck Alcon o/b/o Jim and Mary Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road, Sketch Plan Mayor/Council Report City Administrator Report 22. Resolution Supporting Orono Parks, Green Spaces, Playgrounds, & Trails in Perpetuity City Attorney Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2017 11-20-17 - Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Denny Walsh) 11-27-17 - City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 11-27-17 - City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 12-11-17 - Truth in Taxation Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 12-11-17 - City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 12-22-17 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 12-25-17 - Official Holiday, City Offices Closed Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard Crosby, II, and Aaron Printup. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Service Director Jeremy Barnhart, Finance Director Ron Olson, City Planner Melanie Curtis, Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards, City Attorney Soren Mattick, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended, with the addition of Item No. 11. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2017 3. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF OCTOER 9, 2017 4. CLAIMSBILLS 5. GOLF COURSE AND PARKS SUPERVISOR APPOINTMENT 6. LIFT STATION #2 BACKUP GENERATOR — PAY REQUEST NO.4 — FINAL VWT XR77WDA7W199WROV.3DATAf.Y17AIKOD ►5 M111Y104WR901103MuiBielI 11. LONG LAKE RAVINE STABILIZATION PROJECT PUBLIC COMMENTS Cassie Ordway, 1445 County Road 6, stated she would like to remind people that the Long Lake Water Association is hosting an education summit on Tuesday, October 24, at 6:30. The summit will take place at Orono City Hall. Representatives from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be present to discuss their Comprehensive Plan as well as the data they have been collecting from the Long Lake Creek and Long Lake Water Association's partnership with Long Lake and Orono. Public input is welcome. PRESENTATION 8. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL UPDATE AND CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT Jean Brustad, Gillespie Center, stated she has been a member of the Orono community for 30 years. Brustad stated the Gillespie Center is one of the unique senior centers in the country. Most senior centers are built and completely funded by their cities, requiring very little, if any, fundraising. The Gillespie Center building has been in existence for 16 years, but the senior organization in this community has been Page 1 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL UPDATE AND CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT — Continued around for almost 30 years. The Gillespie building was built by fundraising and donations by community members and various groups with a large matching donation from the Gillespie family. The Gillespie Senior Center has a goal of raising a large endowment fund to support most of the expenses of running the center. The Gillespie Center is technically a senior center but it often calls itself a community center. Brustad stated the question that needs to be answered is why are they important to this community. Research shows that an active senior center helps reduce the risk of depression and the slowing of cognitive skills of seniors. Seniors involved in an active senior center are helped in their ability to continue to live independently in their own homes. An active senior center enhances social connectiveness of the community and can help the seniors experience measurable improvements in their physical, social, spiritual, emotional and mental well-being. According to the City's website on the demographics of the City, the official general population of Orono decreased from 2000 to 2010, while the population of those over 65 increased. Looking at other statistical pages from other sites finds that the current population of Orono is over 8,000 and the population of those 60 and over is over 20 percent. Brustad stated those numbers help to show part of the need for the Gillespie Center. The Gillespie Center has contracted with Senior Community Services, which is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to develop, coordinate and provide services that help meet the needs of older adults and support their caregivers. They offer creative solutions for helping all generations better enjoy their later years for several senior centers in the area. SCS has a program called Home, which provides inside and outside household maintenance for the elder. They offer a variety of people that help perform a number of small household tasks that help keep a household safe for a senior to live in. They provide services that the senior is no longer able to complete themselves. This program is for anyone 60 and over and there is a sliding scale fee for the services. Sometimes volunteers offer their services and there is no charge. The goal is to keep the home safe and a place they can continue to live in. Brustad noted she distributed a brochure to the City Council on the Home program. Brustad stated another part of SCS's program is called Senior Partners Care. This program helps seniors obtain medical care they need by helping to bridge the financial gap between their medical bills and their Medicare coverage. SCS provides a licensed social worker who offices part-time at the Gillespie Center. She provides resources to seniors and their family caregivers as they go through the various stages of maturity. She provides individual, private help after meeting with the senior and often their families after learning their individual concerns. SCS also provides a volunteer, Chuck Radke, that offices at the Gillespie Center to help seniors and their family make educated choices with their Medicare and health insurance questions. He meets one on one with seniors to go through those individual choices. Since he is not selling a product, he is able to give them complete choices without the bias of a sale for their various insurance needs. SCS provides him training every year for this job so he is current with the various resources available. SCS also works with six other senior centers. They provide the Gillespie Center with its one and only full-time paid employee. The Gillepie Center's director is Mindy Anderson. With her knowledge of Page 2 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL UPDATE AND CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT — Continued working with other senior centers, her training and the network that is involved with SCS and their contracts, several activities and classes are able to happen at the Gillespie Center because of this collaboration. Mindy Anderson also coordinates for SCS the Meals -On -Wheels program for Orono and Long Lake. The community garden brings fresh produce for Meals -On -Wheel participants. Each year the Gillespie Center tries to be involved in the community and the events the community has and volunteers participate in the Spirit of the Lakes festival, providing bingo, a pork dinner and a booth at the park, as well as provide volunteers for one of the rest areas for the Tour de Tonka. The seniors also host a table at the farmers market and other area festivals and has volunteers that go help at the Feed My Children center. Like most senior centers, the Gillespie Center offers the usual activities, such as an active photography club where they usually take a field trip every week or spend time at the center using new software or camera techniques. The Gillespie Center also has every kind of card club you can think of as well as a beading class, craft clubs, knitting, crocheting, painting, and many other groups the members suggest. Each of these groups is usually organized and run by a volunteer member. There are also several exercise groups, such as line dancing, plus two different levels of exercise with an instructor, including yoga and a Nordic walking group. These are all very popular and help keep the seniors and other community members healthy and involved. This year the Gillespie Center received a U -Care health and wellness grant in connection with the University of Minnesota Extension classes. Because of this grant, the Gillespie Center was able to offer four different classes free to the community: one on nutrition, shopping on budget, core and movement for the body, and stretching and greeting. The grant also helped to subsidize the Gillespie Center's foot care program and there were 109 visits to the nurse that works with the seniors on foot care. A total of 519 people over the age of 50 from all over the area were able to be helped by the grant, which was obtained by the SCS for the Gillespie Center. A senior choir group at the Gillespie Center entertains members at other nursing homes, senior apartment buildings and other places around the area. Other activities are also offered as part of the Gillespie Center's attempt to keep people involved and having fun. Every third Wednesday there is a country jam where singers and musicians come from all over the city area to entertain the seniors. Some Wednesdays there are as few as 50 in the audience and some Wednesdays there are more than 150. Research has shown that it is important for all age groups to be involved with each other. The Gillespie Center has activities during the year that involves students and grandparents. These activities help get the members of the community to do fun activities with each other. Another activity is Santa's Hidden Treasures, which is very popular with the children. Parents and grandparents bring their children to the center where they are able to purchase gifts for a reasonable price that they can give to their family. These gifts are all donated to the center. The participants can also get their picture taken with Santa. The Gillespie Center is also working on adding to the endowment fund with help from the cities of Minnetrista, Mound, and Spring Lake Park so the Gillespie Center will be able to be self-sufficient for future seniors. In order to achieve the goal of matching these funds these cities give to the Gillespie Center, volunteers help host several fundraising activities. Brustad stated they have received help from many, including personal help from Orono's mayor. In addition, the center also hosts a golf tournament, Page 3 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL UPDATE AND CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT — Continued hosts a holiday boutique with over 80 vendors, sells sweepstake tickets, and provides lunch and evening activities. The Gillespie Center also collaborates with Al and Alma's to have a Monday noon cruise on Mondays, with a portion of the profits being donated to the center. Volunteers also sell Script cards and the facility is rented out for weddings, funerals, and other activities. Another service to the community is the Gillespie Center's day-old bakery. Different volunteers drive to Cub Foods every morning seven days a week to pick up their day-old bakery goods and bring them to the center. Brustad stated they also had a chicken roaster donated to the center that has already been used for one of the fundraisers. Brustad noted each year the Gillespie Center needs to raise around $120,000 for their matching funds. The Gillespie Center is run with volunteers and there are more than 480 members, many of whom are active and volunteer for a host of activities and projects. There is also the youth of the community that volunteers along with the seniors. The Gillespie Center hosts several sports banquets for both the Mound and Orono School District, which involves students at the center. For many of the activities at the center, members of the Honor Society or DECA or other organizations at the schools are at the center helping with setup, cleanup, handing out food, or just helping out wherever help is needed. Without volunteers of all ages, the center could not make it. Brustad stated every year they try to offer new activities and opportunities for the community. This year one of those activities was a quilter's retreat, with 39 quilters coming together from as far away as Stillwater using their own machines, scissors, cutting boards, and a group of people sharing talents, ideas, tons of laughter and fun. The Gillespie Center also has a free lending library that is coordinated by a volunteer. The books are donated and loaned out for free to anyone in the community. Brustad stated most of the programs are free and open to the community. Attendance is not taken and the community the person lives in is not asked. Brustad stated the funds that Orono provides the Gillespie Center are not part of the fundraising funds and are just a small part of what is sent to Senior Community Services. Brustad noted the funds from Orono were cut in half a few years ago and the Gillespie Center has had to make up that difference. Brustad stated even when you ask people where they live, the answer varies, and sometimes the answer is not accurate due to the confusion with mailing addresses and post offices. Brustad noted she lives in Orono but her mailing address is Wayzata, she receives fire services from Navarre and Excelsior, but she lives closest to Spring Park. Brustad stated the best numbers she can provide are that 60 Orono residents were served through the Senior Community Services at various activities that they coordinate that are not through the Gillespie Center, 38 Orono residents are considered paid members of the Gillespie Center, and 25 Orono residents receive Meals on Wheels, involving over 1,400 meals delivered by volunteers. Brustad stated the Gillespie Center would like to thank the Orono City Council for what they have done for the center in the past and that she hopes Orono continues to fund the center and perhaps raise their contribution. Brustad noted the money from Orono goes to Senior Community Services and is not part of the contracts the Gillespie Center has with the other three cities for the endowment. Page 4 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. GILLESPIE CENTER ANNUAL UPDATE AND CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT — Continued Printup thanked Ms. Brustad for coming before the Council. Walsh stated the Gillespie Center provides great services to the seniors. Crosby thanked her for all the work she and the Gillespie Center does. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the annual funding request in the amount of $9,500 for the Gillespie Center in support of their services and programming provided to Orono residents. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARING 9. CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES — RESOLUTION NO. 6800 Mayor Walsh noted the purpose of this agenda item is to hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution certifying delinquent utility charges to Hennepin County for collection as a special assessment. Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. There were no public comments. Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6800, a Resolution Certifying Delinquent Utility Charges and Providing for the Collection of Delinquent 2017 Water and Sewer Utility Service Charges, Recycling Program Fees, On -Site Sewage Treatment Program, and Storm Water Charges. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 10. #17-3982 CITY OF ORONO — ORONO WOODS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Walsh stated the purpose of this item is to formally approve an action agreed to in September by the City Council to facilitate the sale of Orono Woods land to a private owner. The City Council needs to waive Planning Commission review of the item, which requires a unanimous vote, hold a public hearing, and then consider an amendment to the PUD Agreement to formally facilitate the actions in July and approved by the HRA in September. Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. Tony Lange, Orono Woods, LLC, stated he is here tonight to answer any questions and that they are looking forward to being a part of the community for a long time. Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to waive the Planning Commission review and to approve the PUD amendment as drafted. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Page 5 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 12. #17-3968 SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY ON BEHALF OF FREDERICK AND PATRICIA JOHNSON, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID 07-117-23-0026) — RESOLUTION NO. 6801 & RESOLUTION NO. 6802 Curtis noted the City Council directed Staff at its last meeting to draft a resolution denying the request for a rear yard setback variance and to draft a resolution approving the request for an average lakeshore setback variance, lot area and lot width variances. Tonight the applicant is asking the City Council to reconsider the rear yard setback variance. The applicant has provided revised house and site plans showing an example of the home footprint. The designed home is within the approved building footprint and intended to conform to all applicable zoning code requirements, including height. The applicant has also provided a revised site plan and house plan to illustrate their amended rear yard setback request to permit a 20 -foot rear yard setback, which would allow for additional width to accommodate a 2 -car garage. Michael Sharratt, Sharratt Design, stated they listened to the concerns expressed by the City Council at the last meeting and they have revised their plans to address the rear yard setback. Sharratt stated they are not suggesting this is a resolved concept and that it may need more scrutiny but that it was the best they could do within the last few days. Sharratt stated their other plan reacts to the requirement for a two -car garage. If a variance is not requested and there is just a one -car garage, there is only one place to obtain a two -car width and that is toward the rear property line. Sharratt stated they increased the setback request to ten feet and decreased the width of the garage. Sharratt noted the minimum is typically 20 or 22 feet. Sharratt stated if that is not possible, then the variance for the one -car garage has to be applied for. Sharratt noted there is only 8.3 feet on the east property line and that they have shrunk the building footprint to 416 square feet. The upper levels are cantilevered over that are. As a result, Plan A shows hardcover at 10.3 percent where 25 percent is allowed, and it meets the right, lake side setback. Plan B has 15 percent hardcover or 50 percent of what is allowed for structural coverage Crosby asked if they are meeting the rear setback. Walsh stated the plans are showing what could be built with a 20 -foot rear yard setback instead of 30 feet. Mayor Walsh asked if there is any public comment regarding this application. Shawn McDermott, 1530 Orchard Beach Place, requested the City Council apply the City ordinances as they stand right now. McDermott noted the applicant is looking for four variances on this property and that the neighbors are looking at the negative impact this project would have on their property values. McDermott stated he would appeal to the City Council to consider the common benefit of the City and the people who live in the neighborhood and not the benefit of one landowner. There were no further public comments. Page 6 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 12. #17-3968 SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY ON BEHALF OF FREDERICK AND PATRICIA JOHNSON, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID 07-117-23-0026) — RESOLUTION NO. 6801 & RESOLUTION NO. 6802 — Continued Walsh noted the City Council discussed this application two weeks ago and that the question before them is whether anything compelling has been raised to change the decision they made two weeks ago. Crosby stated there is a lack of space to build on and that nothing raised tonight has changed his mind. Walsh stated he can see the one -car garage as a practical difficulty and that the City has granted variances in the past to allow a one -car garage. Walsh stated he does not see anything compelling that would change the Council's decision from two weeks ago. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6802, a Resolution approving the lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore setback variances for the property located at 1565 Orchard Beach Road, and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6801, a Resolution denying the rear yard setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. 13. REVIEW ORDINANCE PRIORITIES Barnhart stated Staff has been directed to research a number of ordinances and then present Staff's recommendations back to the City Council. Staff is limited on resources to handle all of these at the same time and are looking for direction on prioritization. Barnhart noted seven priorities identified last fall have been completed. Barnhart stated Staff is looking at the following possible ordinances: Ordinance to regulate special events; ordinance to clarify accessory structure setbacks, 2. Ordinance to amend the regulations of signage, include size, location, illumination, and to confirm content neutrality, Ordinance to review permitted and conditional uses in the business districts, 4. Ordinance to remove hour restrictions on Long Lake. An ordinance has been primarily written by Long Lake and Staff will be utilizing most of that language. 5. Ordinance to regulate rentals, including short-term rentals and the need to regulate long-term and short-term rentals. Barnhart noted this is being driven to a certain extent by the Super Bowl since it will be bringing more activity into town. 6. Ordinance to clarify definitions, including dry buildable, connected, in kind, restaurants. Barnhart stated earlier today during the work session the City Council discussed the wetland ordinances to reduce the setback requirements. Due to limited Staff resources and time being spent on the Comprehensive Plan and the Navarre plan, Barnhart indicated he can only do one ordinance a month and that he would like the City Council to prioritize the proposed ordinances. Page 7 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. REVIEW ORDINANCE PRIORITIES — Continued Walsh stated the City Council was pretty intent on getting the short-term rentals taken care of. Crosby stated the structural setback is pretty important, but given the approaching winter, that might be less of a priority at this time. Walsh stated the ordinance regarding the hours on Long Lake is also less of a priority at this time. Barnhart stated from a timing perspective, the first Planning Commission meeting available is November and that the agenda will likely include the short-term rental ordinance. Barnhart indicated January is probably when he would start looking at setting the stage for variances and building permits and that he can do the accessory structure setback ordinance then. Walsh stated the buffer and setbacks is a work in process. Barnhart indicated that could be number three. Barnhart stated if the special event ordinance is in the land use code, it will need to go before the Planning Commission. Printup noted the City experienced some trouble a few months ago with special events. Barnhart stated his goal is not to correct a concern with a private party but to look at what triggers a special event and the need for a permit. Currently it is based almost solely on parking and that language could be drafted to improve on that. Walsh commented the signage ordinance could perhaps be reviewed by the City Attorney. Barnhart stated the signage ordinance could be made easier to understand and that the City Council has not reviewed it in a long time. Barnhart suggested that ordinance be prioritized as number eight. Walsh stated some of the City's Code in general has been piecemealed together over time and that there is a lot of conflicting narratives and different descriptions. Walsh stated it would behoove the City to find some money in the special project contingency fund to perhaps hire a consultant to help bring the City's Code altogether and make it one consistent vehicle. Walsh stated if the City is going to really fix something, that should be a high priority. Mattick concurred the code is disjointed but noted that once changes are made to one section, the question is how big of a project it becomes. Walsh stated in general the feeling was that the whole thing overall needs to be completely rebuilt and put back together so it makes sense all the way around. Walsh stated the City Code needs to read consistently. Rief stated the zoning section is a pretty significant portion and that from a Staff resources standpoint, it would be money well spent. Walsh stated once it is done right, then the City will not need to review it again for a while. Page 8 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. REVIEW ORDINANCE PRIORITIES — Continued Barnhart stated based on tonight's discussion, he will prioritize it as follows: Short-term rentals, Long Lake/personal watercraft, a public hearing on November 13 for the short-term rental ordinance, accessory structure setbacks, wetlands as number three, and definitions as number four, with the City Attorney reviewing the signage ordinance. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Printup noted the Long Lake Waters Association is having its second annual education summit to learn about the Long Lake Watershed. Crosby stated he would like to thank Jean Brustad from the Gillespie Center for her nice presentation and that the seniors in the community appreciate the Gillespie Center. Walsh reported last week the school committee met and discussed Old Crystal Bay Road and County Road 6 and possible options for improving that area. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT Olson reviewed the City's third quarter financial report, noting that a number of departments are close to 100 percent or slightly below their budgets. Olson stated the City will be receiving its final tax settlement towards December and that right now the City's property tax revenues are at 51 percent. Overall the City's revenues are in good shape, with licenses and permits at 80 percent. As it concerns other governmental revenue, the City should be receiving their 2017 state police aid in the very near future, which will be around $200,000. Olson noted the police department will be over budget on that line item. Charges for services are at 98 percent, with a large portion of those dollars being police service contracts. Olson noted the City's fine revenue is only at 60 percent of what was budgeted, with that item decreasing the past few years. Some of the reasons that has happened is because the state and county are taking bigger cuts and fewer citations are being written but overall that item should be on budget for this year. Revenue from the golf course has been going up since 2014 and it is anticipated that number will be close to $200,000 by the end of the year. Olson stated overall the City is at 70 percent of revenues at this point. Last year at this time the City was at 67 percent of revenue and ended up at 102 percent. Olson noted back in 2009 the City took in less in building permits than was budgeted, but in 2011 there were a few storms and building permit revenue was significantly higher. In 2012, 2013, and 2014, it was fairly steady, and in 2016 revenues were a little under budget on the building permit revenue line. Olson stated in 2017 the City should get up to the budgeted amount. Page 9 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT — Continued As it relates to expenditures, the City is currently at 97.87 percent. Olson noted the yellow highlighted items are the items that are close to being over budget. Mayor and council are at 82 percent, which consists mainly of membership fees and council salaries, and is expected to be at 100 percent by the end of the year. Olson noted the administration budget is over budget due to the fact the City had a temporary city administrator working for six months and the interim city administrator was paid almost as much as was budgeted for the entire year. Olson stated that should not happen in 2018 since the City now has a permanent city administrator. In addition, law and legal services will probably be over budget since the City had one legal matter where the City spent $8,000 that was not budgeted and $8,000 was spent on updating ordinances. Olson stated the City Council should probably tweak next year's budget since they are still looking at ordinance updates. Olson noted central services are also a little high, with the ordinance updates factoring into that as well. In 2017, the City spent $8,800 on ordinance updates online and the item cloud backups was not in the 2017 budget, which came in at $11,000. Olson noted the engineering department is overbudget at this time, but it has been determined there were some miscodings that should have been charged to the water and sewer budgets. Special services are at 130 percent and include pass-through charges. Special projects and contingencies are at 106 percent which is due to the search for the new city administrator. Olson stated overall the City is at 78 percent of budget and will probably end up around 100 percent by the end of the year. Olson reviewed the City's new investments for the second and third quarter. Olson noted the City is receiving a better interest rate than in 2016 on their investments. As it relates to the City's 2017 vendor payments, the top three vendors are the City of Long Lake for fire protection services, Bolton and Menk, and then HealthPartners for the employees' health insurance. The City Council took no formal action on this item. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Mattick stated he had nothing to report. ITEM NO. 15. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS UNION NEGOTIATIONS Walsh moved, Crosby seconded, to enter into closed session to discuss union negotiations at 8:08 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (The Orono City Council was in closed session from 8:08 p.m. to 8:44 p.m.) ADJOURNMENT Crosby Moved, Printup seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:45 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Page 10 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 23, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 11 of 11 Orono City Council Work Session Monday, October 23, 2017 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. AGENDA PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Aaron Printup, and Richard F. Crosby II. Representing staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart and City Clerk Anna Carlson. Victoria Seals and Wendy Dankey were absent. Meeting Start Time: 6:00 p.m. 1. Open Meeting Law There was no discussion regarding the Open Meeting Law item. This item will be moved for discussion at a later date. 2. Wetland Buffer / Setback Clarification Community Development Director, Jeremy Barnhart presented the Wetland Buffer/Setback Clarification item. Barnhart referred to the May Council meeting when a change was made to the ordinance related to the wetland setback and wetland buffer. Barnhart mentioned that the City Council approved modifications to the zoning ordinance as it related to when a wetland delineation is required, but the City Council did not amend the setback requirements. Barnhart noted that the buffer requirements are established by the MCWD and nothing can be done within that buffer, inherently the MCWD also tries to encourage native vegetation within that area. Council members confirmed knowledge of what can and cannot be done within the buffer. Council Member, Richard Crosby asked the definition of wetland and what makes it a wetland. Barnhart mentioned that there are varying things that make up a wetland and gave some examples. Barnhart explained wetland buffers versus wetland setbacks. The wetland buffer is a Watershed imposed land use limitation on land surrounding a delineated wetland and no activity can occur within a buffer. A wetland setback is a city imposed restriction on building and grading activity and is intended to preserve the buffer by establishing a minimum separation between buildings and hard cover and the buffer. Discussion regarding the differences between the wetland buffer and wetland setback followed. Barnhart mentioned that there had previously been discussion about decreasing the setback. Barnhart stated that the Planning Commission did not recommend any changes to the ordinance. Barnhart mentioned that they are trying to create a balance for the buffer -setback by being somewhat open since wetlands often change with the climate. Barnhart recommended not looking into removing the additional setback, but possibly looking into reducing it. Barnhart mentioned by reducing the setback you are allowing homeowners the ability to fully use their property. There was further discussion regarding the possibilities of various options to regulate the setback. No action was taken but later discussion may follow in future meetings. Meeting End Time: 6:45p.m. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 108427 to 108530, totaling $311,781.65. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #108474 League of Mn Cities $7,665.00 Payment for deductible and City Share of defense costs on Insurance Trust a land use claim. #108479 Met Council Env $37,275.00 Payment for September SAC Charges which includes 11 Services SAC units for the Ice Arena #108529 Waste WSB $ 4,240.00 Payment for October recycling service including the Recycled Materials Offset (RMO). 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits Exhibit A. Check Register Prepared By: qjV Reviewed By:.b)X1 Approved By: 5bV City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Advance Auto Parts 11/13/2017 108427 398561 101-43000-403 Compactor Repair Public Works Department 11.33 Total 108427: 11.33 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR 11/13/2017 108428 S098843396 101-42110-402 #230 Tires Police Department 584.86 Total 108428: 584.86 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUT 11/13/2017 108429 15188 101-41900-319 Administrative Fee 11/17 Central Services 497.50 Total 108429: 497.50 ASPEN EQUIPMENT 11/13/2017 108430 10181106 101-43000-403 Parts - Prewet System Public Works Department 35.84 Total 108430: 35.84 BATTERIES PLUS 11/13/2017 108431 021-380655 602-49450-406 Mission SCADA Batteries Sewer 78.27 Total 108431: 78.27 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655256 101-45200-415 Bederwood Park Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655257 101-45200-415 Summit Beach Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655258 101-45200-415 Hackberry Park Parks 125.00 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655259 101-45210-415 Orono Golf Course Golf Course 62.78 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655260 101-45200-415 Crystal Bay Playground Parks 62.50 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655261 101-45200-415 Navarre Playground Parks 160.00 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655262 101-45200-415 French Creek Preserve Parks 62.50 BIFFS INC 11/13/2017 108432 W655263 101-45200-415 Lurton Park biff Parks 62.50 Total 108432: 855.28 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0203970 435-48967-304 Fox Street Improvements 10,911.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208700 602-16500 2016 sewer improvements 512.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208701 101-43280-304 15-3739 Mooney Lake Preserve Special Services 60.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208703 101-43290-304 Ivy Place Plan Review Special Projects -Contingencies 408.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208704 651-49910-304 GIS Maint - Storm Storm Water 3,751.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208704 101-43170-304 GIS Maint Engineering 1,200.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208704 602-49450-304 GIS - Sewer Updates Sewer 96.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208709 651-49910-304 2017 Pond Maintenance Storm Water 978.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208725 101-43170-304 Willow Drive Trail Engineering 128.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208729 435-48966-304 2018 street improvements 8,303.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208730 101-43170-304 ADA transition plan Engineering 365.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208731 435-48967-304 Fox Street Improvements 12,778.50 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208733 402-48055-304 OCB Feasability Study OCB Road Reconstruction 8,792.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208734 101-43170-304 OCB Temp Turn Lanes Engineering 1,625.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208735 101-43280-304 Orono Preserve Special Services 55.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208736 101-43280-304 Shadywood Villas Special Services 55.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208737 651-49910-304 Surface Water Managment Plan Storm Water 6,342.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208738 101-43280-304 Tanager Estates Special Services 101.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 0208739 601-49400-304 Water Supply Plan Water 532.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11/13/2017 108433 02088710 435-48966-304 2017 Sewer Improvements 13,630.50 Total 108433: 70,623.00 Brian Clark 11/13/2017 108434 10/27/17 601-49400-437 SUSA Training Water 18.19 Brian Clark 11/13/2017 108434 10/27/17 602-49450-437 SUSA Training Sewer 18.19 Total 108434: 36.38 Bruce Birkeland 11/13/2017 108435 2017-3912 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-3912 1298 Wildhurst Trail 700.00 Total 108435: 700.00 BUDGET PRINTING 11/13/2017 108436 5636 101-41900-352 Dog Park Hangers Central Services 327.80 BUDGET PRINTING 11/13/2017 108436 5669 101-41900-201 Inspection Notices Central Services 506.32 Total 108436: 834.12 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 11/13/2017 108437 WO -329175- 101-41900-201 Copy Paper Central Services 329.90 Total 108437: 329.90 CALIBRE PRESS 11/13/2017 108438 53749 101-42110-437 Road Wise Police Department 159.00 Total 108438: 159.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 21717-004G 101-42110-307 Police Matters 9/17 Police Department 201.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 General legal Matters Law/Legal Services 861.90 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 IiD research Law/Legal Services 155.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 Council communications 9117 Law/Legal Services 217.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 Data request Law/Legal Services 108.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 review CBA Law/Legal Services 341.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 audit letter Law/Legal Services 192.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 Council packet Law/Legal Services 17.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-000G 1 101-41600-307 Orono Woods Law/Legal Services 31.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-201G 6 101-41600-307 misc recordings Law/Legal Services 205.69 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-471G 101-41600-307 Nuisance Law/Legal Services 31.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-473G 101-43290-800 Johnson/feldson matter Special Projects -Contingencies 4,534.65 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-508G 235-45690-319 HRA- Orono Woods Police Department 1,455.75 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-512G 101-43280-307 17-3692 Ivy Place Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-515G 101-43280-307 17-3932 135 Orono Orchard Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-516G 101-43280-307 17-3973 Ferndale Special Services 50.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-800G 2 101-42400-307 STAFF MTGS 9/17 Building & Zoning 992.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-801G 2 101-41600-307 Council communications 9/17 Law/Legal Services 589.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/13/2017 108439 2717-802G 2 101-42400-307 b&z assistance 9/17 Building & Zoning 930.00 Total 108439: 11,112.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 30271566 101-42400-319 Survey Monkey Building & Zoning 408.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 AMAZON 101-41900-221 Hard Drives - OQ Sql Central Services 120.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 AMAZON - D 101-42110-221 Hard Drive - OR -Police Police Department 124.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 APWA 651-49910-437 APWA Dues - Adam, Scott, DJ Storm Water 200.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 APWA 602-49450-437 APWA Dues - Adam, Scott, DJ Sewer 200.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 APWA 601-49400-437 APWA Dues - Adam, Scott, DJ Water 200.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 CARIBOU - 101-42110-439 Coffee - Crime Prevention Meeting Police Department 10.40 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 DOMINOS - 101-41110-439 Work Session 10/23/17 Mayor & Council 38.37 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 GROUPON - 101-42110-221 Knives - Kitchen Police Department 53.75 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 LUNDS 101-41110-439 cookies for 10/23/17 Meeting Mayor & Council 13.98 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 LUNDS 101-42400-439 Snacks - Navarre Meeting Building & Zoning 23.96 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 PRINSCO 234-45680-221 Eagle Scout Project - Lurton 663.57 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 SA 101-43000-212 fuel - Small Engine Public Works Department 14.06 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 SLUC 101-42400-437 Sensible Land Use Coalition Building & Zoning 58.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 STEVE1 K99 101-42110-575 Toughbooks - 230, 232, 235 Police Department 2,400.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 U OF M 602-49450-437 Fall APWA Conference Sewer 127.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 U OF M 601-49400-437 Fall APWA Conference Water 127.50 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 U OF M 101-43000-437 FBridge Safety refresher Public Works Department 125.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 UOFM 601-49400-437 2018 Engineers Conference Water 122.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 UOFM 602-49450-437 2018 Engineers Conference Sewer 122.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 11/13/2017 108440 UOFM 651-49910-437 2018 Engineers Conference Storm Water 121.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Page: 4 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 35.00 81.90 Water 604.00 685.90 Total 108440: 29.73 29.73 Golf Course 206.44 CARGILL SALT 11/13/2017 108441 2903700130 601-49400-216 softener salt Total 108441: 42.74 Police Department 42.74 Police Department 150.35 CECE S SIGNS 11/13/2017 108442 7545 101-43000-402 Tailgate #424 Total 108442: 31.50 31.50 Police Department 275.00 CEMSTONE 11/13/2017 108443 360129 234-45680-221 Lurton-Agility Course CEMSTONE 11/13/2017 108443 C1844247 601-49400-403 Generator Pad - Water plant Total 108443: CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 11/13/2017 108444 10741575-4 602-49450-381 Gas -LS #2 Generator Total 108444: CENTURY LINK 11/13/2017 108445 9524731909 101-45210-321 GC phone/internet Total 108445: CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015150 101-42110-402 Oil, Transmission, tires #239 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015166 101-42110-402 Oil, Filter Tires #230 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015180 101-42110-402 #248 oil service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015183 101-42110-402 #242 oil service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015185 101-42110-402 #245 service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015186 101-42110-402 #249 oil service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 11/13/2017 108446 0015192 101-42110-402 #240 oil service Total 108446: CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 11/13/2017 108447 1700188 601-49400-489 water testing Total 108447: CITY OF ST PAUL 11/13/2017 108448 25281 101-42110-437 PDI Training Page: 4 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Department Invoice Amount 5,273.09 Water 4,620.55 4,620.55 Public Works Department 35.00 35.00 81.90 Water 604.00 685.90 Sewer 29.73 29.73 Golf Course 206.44 206.44 Police Department 262.47 Police Department 141.83 Police Department 42.74 Police Department 42.74 Police Department 150.35 Police Department 42.74 Police Department 45.79 728.66 Water 31.50 31.50 Police Department 275.00 City of Orono Invoice Amount 275.00 Water Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Sewer 15,554.08 23,574.61 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 268.69 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108448: CITY OF WAYZATA 11/13/2017 108449 3RD 2017 601-49400-387 Utility Charges CITY OF WAYZATA 11/13/2017 108449 3RD 2017 602-49450-387 Utility Charges Total 108449: COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 11/13/2017 108450 171015 601-49400-405 casco Ave Patch Total 108450: CONCEPT LANDSCAPING 11/13/2017 108451 3492 101-45200-319 Barge to Big Island Total 108451: CORREY FARNIOK 11/13/2017 108452 HC CHIEFS 101-42110-437 HC Chiefs Lunch Total 108452: DBG LLC 11/13/2017 108453 2016-00289 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2016-00289 4220 Chippewa Lane Total 108453: Deborah Maschoff 11/13/2017 108454 753 BOULDE 999-10015 Overpyament of Final Bill Total 108454: DELTA DENTAL 11/13/2017 108455 0037220072 101-15998 0037220072 Nov/2017 Dental DELTA DENTAL 11/13/2017 108455 0037220072 101-21709 0037220072 Nov/2017 Dental Total 108455: DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 11/13/2017 108456 18397 101-45210-441 retailers buyers card/Golf Total 108456: DOG WASTE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108457 178843 234-45680-221 Pet Wast Stations Page: 5 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Department Invoice Amount 275.00 Water 8,020.53 Sewer 15,554.08 23,574.61 Water 268.69 268.69 Parks 2,925.00 2,925.00 Police Department 15.00 Golf Course 15.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 252.54 252.54 539.00 2,560.00 20.00 679.97 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108457: Donald & Heidi Haberman 11/13/2017 108458 2710 PENCE 999-10015 Overpayment of Final Bill Total 108458: EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 11/13/2017 108459 0115870_IN 101-43000-224 City Easment signs EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 11/13/2017 108459 0115882 -IN 101-43000-226 street signs EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 11/13/2017 108459 0115888 -IN 101-43000-224 street signs Total 108459: ECM PUBLISHERS INC 11/13/2017 108460 537836 602-49450-352 Certification List publication ECM PUBLISHERS INC 11/13/2017 108460 538243 101-41900-352 Accountant Advertisment Total 108460: G & K SERVICES 11/13/2017 108461 6006725278 101-45210-223 mats - GC G & K SERVICES 11/13/2017 108461 600672567 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 11/13/2017 108461 6006736283 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 11/13/2017 108461 6006747374 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 11/13/2017 108461 6006758516 101-43000-226 unifomrs Total 108461: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 11/13/2017 108462 3270-380215 101-45200-402 Parts #210 Total 108462: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 11/13/2017 108463 7100630 601-49400-489 locates GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 11/13/2017 108463 7100630 602-49450-489 locates Total 108463: GPSit INC 11/13/2017 108464 11012017 101-42110-550 GPS tracker/case/data,sms & software Total 108464: HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 11/13/2017 108465 1000098946 101-42110-414 radios 9/2017 Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Sewer Central Services Golf Course Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Parks Water Sewer Police Department Police Department Page: 6 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice Amount 679.97 49.16 49.16 236.28 780.58 166.00 1,182.86 89.40 241.66 331.06 2.57 68.29 53.89 233.40 20.08 20.08 256.50 820.63 820.63 95.30 City of Orono 16.00 Police Department 6.59 Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT 2,500.00 2,500.00 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 5,000.00 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 290.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 11/13/2017 108465 1000100475 101-43000-414 radio Communication -10/2017 Total 108465: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 11/13/2017 108466 1000100270 101-41600-309 jail charges Total 108466: Hong Cao 11/13/2017 108467 2625 CASCA 999-10015 Overpayment at Closing Total 108467: JANE SZCZEPANIK 11/13/2017 108468 11032017 101-42110-437 training JANE SZCZEPANIK 11/13/2017 108468 11032017 101-42110-226 uniforms/clothing Total 108468: JHG Properties LLC 11/13/2017 108469 2017-00797 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-00797 4035 Dahl Road JHG Properties LLC 11/13/2017 108469 2017-3963 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-3963 4035 Dahl Road Total 108469: Kelley & Kelley, Inc 11/13/2017 108470 2017-794 602-16500 LS #2 Project Total 108470: Kevin Kretch 11/13/2017 108471 2017-3949 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-3949 3155 Casco Circle Total 108471: LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATI 11/13/2017 108472 2018 DOCK 101-45200-441 2018 Dock License Total 108472: LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 11/13/2017 108473 257983 101-41110-433 2017-2018 Dues Total 108473: LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TR 11/13/2017 108474 GL14244 703-49960-379 Deductible -Litigation Share Page: 7 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Department Invoice Amount Public Works Department 2,030.52 2,125.82 Law/Legal Services 378.37 Police Department 16.00 Police Department 6.59 22.59 2,500.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 919.34 919.34 700.00 700.00 Parks 290.00 Mayor & Council 7,394.58 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108474: LOGIS 11/13/2017 108475 44346 101-41900-401 ASA Issues/Configuration LOGIS 11/13/2017 108475 44346 101-42110-401 ASA Issues/Configuration LOGIS 11/13/2017 108475 44346 601-49400-401 ASA Issues/Configuration Total 108475: LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 11/13/2017 108476 8425898 601-49400-402 Hardware LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 11/13/2017 108476 B427342 101-43000-224 Signs LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 11/13/2017 108476 B427363 601-49400-405 Fuses Total 108476: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/13/2017 108477 20466450 101-42110-212 Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/13/2017 108477 20466451 101-43000-212 Diesel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/13/2017 108477 20481993 101-42110-212 Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/13/2017 108477 20481994 101-43000-212 Diesel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11/13/2017 108477 20481996 101-43000-212 Fuels Total 108477: Mark Beltrand 11/13/2017 108478 2017-01403 101-22205 Escrow refund#2017-01403 1860 West Farm rd Total 108478: MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTA 11/13/2017 108479 SEP2017 101-20802 sep 2017/SAC Total 108479: METRO WEST INSPECTIONS S 11/13/2017 108480 1241 101-42400-310 Sep/17-Inspection Services Total 108480: Michael & Holly Rucinski 11/13/2017 108481 2016-00213 101-22205 Escrow refund#2016-00213 3188 North Shore Drive Total 108481: MIDWEST AQUA CARE 11/13/2017 108482 2017 101-45210-404 2017 Pond Maintenance Department Central Services Police Department Water Water Public Works Department Water Police Department Public Works Department Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Building & Zoning Golf Course Page: 8 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice Amount 7,394.58 115.00 115.00 172.50 402.50 5.58 16.49 4.49 26.56 3,063.20 352.75 880.82 504.11 1,675.47 10,000.00 10,000.00 890.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Page: 9 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 108482: 890.00 Mike & Deb Benedict 11/13/2017 108483 2016-00701 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2016-00701 25 Orono Orchard Roa 2,500.00 Total 108483: 2,500.00 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 11/13/2017 108484 P62374 101-43000-403 Chainsaw supplies Public Works Department 4.59 Total 108484: 4.59 MINT ROOFING 11/13/2017 108485 543634 101-41900-404 PW roof repair Central Services 340.90 MINT ROOFING 11/13/2017 108485 568049 101-41900-404 Roof Repairs Public Works Central Services 425.00 MINT ROOFING 11/13/2017 108485 568053 101-41900-404 Citty Hall Roof Maint Central Services 1,111.00 MINT ROOFING 11/13/2017 108485 571607 101-41900-404 Citty Hall Roof Maint Central Services 214.74 Total 108485: 2,091.64 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-34210 sales tax- sep 2017 3.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-37910 sales tax- sep 2017 921.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-37920 sales tax- sep 2017 497.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-37930 sales tax- sep 2017 125.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-37940 sales tax- sep 2017 58.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 11/13/2017 108486 SEP -2017 101-37970 sales tax- sep 2017 24.00 Total 108486: 1,628.00 MN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 11/13/2017 108487 112017 101-21710 Pera life 11/2017 224.00 Total 108487: 224.00 MORRIES BODYWORKS 11/13/2017 108488 BSCB795756 101-42110-402 Replace windshield # #239 DTF vehicle Police Department 255.00 Total 108488: 255.00 MOUND TRUE VALUE 11/13/2017 108489 148001 101-42110-201 plates & detergent Police Department 12.48 MOUND TRUE VALUE 11/13/2017 108489 148206 101-42110-221 towels Police Department 13.99 Total 108489: 26.47 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 305890 101-43000-226 locks, gloves Public Works Department 179.87 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 305906 601-49400-405 3800 casco ave repairs Water 16.47 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 305924 601-49400-405 3800 casco ave repairs Water 14.42 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 305928 601-49400-405 3800 casco ave repairs Water 7.65 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 306055 101-43000-224 sign mount & bolts Public Works Department 8.79 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 306056 101-43000-224 sign supplies Public Works Department 5.29 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 306175 101-45200-403 navarre park hardware Parks 1.40 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 306193 101-43000-224 broom & supplies Public Works Department 10.00 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11/13/2017 108490 306293 101-43000-224 supplies for signs Public Works Department 39.44 Total 108490: 283.33 NEOPOST USA INC 11/13/2017 108491 15235970 101-41900-322 ink cartridge Central Services 175.00 Total 108491: 175.00 NEWEGG INC 11/13/2017 108492 1300678724 101-41900-201 Monitor spare-city/pd Central Services 89.30 NEWEGG INC 11/13/2017 108492 1300678724 101-42110-201 Monitor spare-city/pd Police Department 89.30 NEWEGG INC 11/13/2017 108492 1300678876 101-42110-201 keyboard & mice city/pd Police Department 22.19 NEWEGG INC 11/13/2017 108492 1300678876 101-41900-201 keyboard & mice city/pd Central Services 22.18 NEWEGG INC 11/13/2017 108492 1300680123 101-41900-201 wireless mouse Central Services 28.05 Total 108492: 251.02 NORLINGS 11/13/2017 108493 33018 651-49910-513 landscape planitngs/casco pt rd Storm Water 272.00 Total 108493: 272.00 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 546 11/13/2017 108494 09302017 101-42110-402 car washes Police Department 60.50 Total 108494: 60.50 O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 11/13/2017 108495 09302017 101-42110-402 car washes Police Department 265.62 Total 108495: 265.62 OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9692232860 101-41900-201 Office Supplies- Central Services 30.54 OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9692233333 101-41900-201 Office Supplies- Central Services 95.87 OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9700030500 101-42110-201 pd/notebooks Police Department 381.63 OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9700039170 101-42110-201 pd/notebooks Police Department 66.58 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9700039218 101-42110-201 pd/office supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9706749440 101-42110-201 pd/office supplies OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9753304001 101-41900-201 Office Supplies - OFFICE DEPOT 11/13/2017 108496 9753305790 101-42110-201 folders Total 108496: OHRT, CARTER 11/13/2017 108497 2016-01025 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2016-01025 3195 Watertown Road Total 108497: ONLINE SOLUTIONS, LLC 11/13/2017 108498 2777 101-42400-441 ciitizen sery 10/15/1 -3/14/2018 -pro rate Total 108498: OPTUM 11/13/2017 108499 945647 101-41900-319 HSA acct maint 3rd qtr 2017 Total 108499: OTTEN BROTHERS 11/13/2017 108500 1-1509261 601-49400-405 Sod/3800 casco ave Total 108500: Patrick & Melissa Mulheran 11/13/2017 108501 2016-01201 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2016-01201 460 Orchard Park Roa Total 108501: Pavers4Fundraising 11/13/2017 108502 10202017 234-45680-404 phase one&two dog park Total 108502: PEARSON BROS INC 11/13/2017 108503 4210 101-43000-221 willow drive & CR6 border Total 108503: PIRTEK 11/13/2017 108504 S2583645.00 601-49400-403 hose -sections Total 108504: PLEAA 11/01/2017 108426 FALL TRAINI 101-42110-437 J Werder- Fall training Department Police Department Police Department Central Services Police Department Building & Zoning Central Services Water Public Works Department Water Police Department Page: 11 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice Amount 66.48 64.38 785.90 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 184.50 184.50 76.04 76.04 40.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Department Sewer Central Services Parks Golf Course Sewer Central Services Page: 12 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice Amount 40.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 405.00 405.00 6,705.00 6,705.00 242.96 406.28 59.18 708.42 1,221.00 1,221.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 111.00 111.00 165.00 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108426: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/13/2017 108505 9670 234-45680-404 Lurton Park Buckthorn Spraying Total 108505: QUALITY CONTROL & INTEGRA 11/13/2017 108506 34274 602-49450-406 LS#10 repairs Total 108506: R.D. & Associates Specialized Se 11/13/2017 108507 103283 651-16500 2018 storm sewer replacement project Total 108507: RANDYS SANITATION INC 11/13/2017 108508 1-241681-30 101-41900-404 oct/17-trash sys RANDYS SANITATION INC 11/13/2017 108508 1-241681-30 101-45200-404 oct/17-trash sys RANDYS SANITATION INC 11/13/2017 108508 1-241681-30 101-45210-404 oct/17-trash sys Total 108508: SAFETY VEHICLE SOLUTIONS 11/13/2017 108509 1719 602-49450-402 #713 replacement warning lights Total 108509: Scott & Laurie Knutson 11/13/2017 108510 2017-3976 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-3976 Total 108510: Scott Hochstedler 11/13/2017 108511 2016-01561 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2016-01561 290 Crestview Total 108511: SECOND NATURE GRAPHICS 11/13/2017 108512 233 101-41900-352 business cards Total 108512: STANTEC CONSULTING SVCS 1 11/13/2017 108513 1255322 651-16500 Carmen Bay Shoreline restoration Department Sewer Central Services Parks Golf Course Sewer Central Services Page: 12 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice Amount 40.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 405.00 405.00 6,705.00 6,705.00 242.96 406.28 59.18 708.42 1,221.00 1,221.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 111.00 111.00 165.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 13 Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108513: Description Department Invoice Amount 165.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 108260 101-42110-226 credit cm277189 Police Department 879.84- STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 CM277684 101-42110-226 Banger,bail out bag Police Department 439.92- STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 CM277711 101-42110-226 vest carrier Police Department 89.99- STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11279237 101-42110-226 Shirt & pants Police Department 144.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11279636 101-42110-226 Shirt - Police Department 49.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11281613 101-42110-226 trousers, shirt alteration Police Department 3.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11281617 101-42110-550 buildup squad#250 Police Department 7,868.73 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11281892 101-42110-226 Shirt, mag holder Police Department 51.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11281939 101-42110-228 4mm Practice , .223 Cal Practice-Wittke Police Department 399.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11281999 101-42110-226 vest,trauma plate, concealable carrier Police Department 1,021.50 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11282044 101-42110-226 Pants Moots Police Department 72.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11282081 101-42110-226 boots Police Department 139.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11282427 101-42110-226 Shirts Police Department 98.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11282999 101-42110-226 name tag Police Department 9.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11283394 101-42110-226 ball vest, shirt, name tag, Police Department 134.49 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11283405 101-42110-226 unform shirt, name tag Police Department 128.49 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11284108 101-42110-226 trousers, mag holder Police Department 35.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11284346 101-42110-226 trousers Police Department 54.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11284747 101-42110-226 name tag Police Department 5.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11285380 101-42110-226 ball vest Police Department 960.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11285542 101-42110-226 2 shirts Police Department 99.18 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11285764 101-42110-226 emblem Police Department 125.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11285765 101-42110-226 Shirt & pants Police Department 24.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 11/13/2017 108514 11285870 101-42110-226 trousers, shirt alteration Police Department 80.00 Total 108514: 10,094.57 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745 -LTD 101-21713 LTD- oct 2017 1,629.93 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745 -LTD 101-21713 LTD- nov2017 1,624.33 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745-NOV 101-15998 Life Ins-nov/2017 190.00 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745-NOV 101-21710 Life Ins-nov/2017 1,040.70 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745-NOV 101-21714 STD-nov/2017 499.70 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745-NOV 101-21714 STD-oct/2017 528.20 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745 -OCT 101-15998 Life Ins-Oct/2017 190.00 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 11/13/2017 108515 237745 -OCT 101-21710 Life Ins-Oct/2017 1,039.30 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 108515: TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 11/13/2017 108516 10242017 101-41600-306 Prosecution Services -10/2017 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 11/13/2017 108516 11012017 101-41600-306 Prosecution Services -10/2017 Total 108516: TC Homes Inc 11/13/2017 108517 2017-3938 101-22205 Escrow Refund#2017-3938 Total 108517: THE HOME DEPOT 11/13/2017 108518 2808000026 225-45025-221 dog agility course/lurton park THE HOME DEPOT 11/13/2017 108518 2808000026 602-49450-406 lift station pads THE HOME DEPOT 11/13/2017 108518 2808000026 602-49450-406 lift station pads THE HOME DEPOT 11/13/2017 108518 5014497 601-49400-223 generator pad concrete Total 108518: THOMSON WEST 11/13/2017 108519 22445860 101-42110-311 clear law enforcement plus Total 108519: TIM SONNEK 11/13/2017 108520 11062017 101-42110-226 clothing & pants Total 108520: TITAN MACHINERY 11/13/2017 108521 10133810 G 101-43000-402 femder front Total 108521: Todd Moitz 11/13/2017 108522 2016-01167 101-22205 Escrow refund#2016-01167 1535 Bohns Point Rd Total 108522: TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 11/13/2017 108523 40071562 101-43000-415 cylinder & Demurrage Total 108523: TONY WHITE 11/13/2017 108524 10212017 101-42110-437 1st responder meals Department Law/Legal Services Law/Legal Services Sewer Sewer Water Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Police Department Page: 14 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Invoice 6,742.16 2,693.04 450.00 700.34 125.61 1,109.15 10.68 10.68 37.88 City of Orono Payee Total 108524: TRI K SERVICES Total 108525: VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS Total 108526: VESSCOINC Total 108527: WILLIAMS TOWING WILLIAMS TOWING WILLIAMS TOWING Total 108528: WSB Total 108529: YARDSCAPESINC Total 108530: Grand Totals: Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 10/24/2017 - 11/13/2017 Page: 15 Nov 09, 2017 09:25AM Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount 37.88 11/13/2017 108525 10122017 601-49400-405 Black Dirt Water 66.00 66.00 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 101-42110-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Police Department 1,765.14 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 101-41900-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Central Services 35.01 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 101-45210-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Golf Course 78.45 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 601-49400-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Water 70.02 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 602-49450-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Sewer 70.02 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 101-43000-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Public Works Department 35.01 11/13/2017 108526 9794006126 101-42400-321 Cell Phone -09/07-10/06/2017 Building & Zoning 35.01 2,088.66 11/13/2017 108527 71028 601-49400-405 leak detector Water 574.00 574.00 11/13/2017 108528 146006 231-45650-436 tow case #17012436 155.00 11/13/2017 108528 6527173 101-42110-402 #244 -tow Police Department 93.50 11/13/2017 108528 6527184 101-42110-402 unit#244 Police Department 153.50 402.00 11/13/2017 108529 R-010727-00 101-42400-319 navarre are plan Building & Zoning 4,240.00 4,240.00 11/13/2017 108530 2016-01167 101-22205 Escrow refund#2016-01167 1535 Bohns Pt Rd 10,000.00 10,000.00 311,781.65 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 5 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Proposed 2018 Official Calendar Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2018 Official Calendar. 2. Background. Council Meetings Council meetings are scheduled for the second and fourth Mondays of the month at 7:00 p.m. Generally only one Council meeting is scheduled in December. The annual budget hearing will be held at the beginning of the December l Oth Council meeting beginning at 6:30 p.m. (Note: This is an early start time) Council Work Sessions Council work sessions are designated prior to the second meeting of the month beginning at 5:00 p.m. No work session is scheduled for December. Planning Commission Meetings Planning Commission meetings are scheduled for the third Monday of the month at 6:30 p.m. January and February are the exceptions because of Monday holidays. In those months, the meetings will be held the following Tuesday. No Planning Commission meeting is scheduled in December. Planning Commission Work Sessions Planning Commission work sessions will be scheduled on an as needed basis and are not reflected on the 2018 calendar. Park Commission Meetings Park Commission meetings are scheduled for the first Monday of every other month at 6:30 p.m. Meeting months are January, March, May, July, September, and November. (Note: The September meeting will be held on Tuesday because of a Monday Holiday.) Park Commission work sessions scheduled for the first Monday of every other month at 1 p.m. The months are February, April, June, August, and October. Holiday Schedule According to the City's personnel policy, the City schedules twelve holidays throughout the year, which include regular holidays and one designated floating holiday to be set by the City Administrator. The regular holidays observed are New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, the Friday after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: -1ja Approved By: JIV AGENDA ITEM 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the 2018 Official Calendar. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to approve the 2018 Official Calendar. Exhibit Exhibit A. 2018 Official Calendar Draft Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: -1ja Approved By: JIV � x t�kesrl o�� January Mo Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16,17 10 18 19 20 21 22 23124 17 25 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 July Su Mo Tu We Thl Fr Sa 1 2 3 Wel 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16,17 5 18 19 20 21 22 23124 11 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 18 19 20,21 29 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Th Fr October Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15,16 Sa 17 18 19 20 21 22123 2 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10 11 130,31, 13 14 15 16 17 18 CITY OF ORONO Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 244-4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1 wmv.ci—no ri— February Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5., 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 May Su Mol Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 August Su Mo Tu Wel Th I Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 z 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20,21 29 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 November Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 130,31, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19,20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2018 OFFICIAL CALENDAR March Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .25t26127 28 29 30 31 June Su Mo Tu Wel Th I Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 September Su Mol Tu Wel Th I Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17,18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 December Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 *10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 130,31, Council Meeting, 2nd & 4th Monday, 7:00 p.m. Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. "(Only One Council Meeting In December with Truth in Taxation 6:30 p.m.) (No Council Work Session in December) Planning Commission Meeting, 3rd Monday 6:30 p.m. (No Planning Commission Meeting in December & Work Sessions as Needed, 5:30 p.m.) Park Commission Meeting 1 st Monday of the Month/Every Other Month, 6:30 p.m. Park Commission (Jan., Mar., May, July, Sept., Nov.) Work Session 1 p.m. Official Holidays AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 6 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Proposed Council Liaison to Planning Commission Meetings in 2018 Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The following is a proposed schedule for Council Member attendance at the monthly Planning Commission meetings during 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date Representative January 16, 2018 (Tuesday) Richard Crosby February 20, 2018 (Tuesday) Aaron Printup March 19, 2018 Victoria Seals April 16, 2018 Wendy Dankey May 21, 2018 Dennis Walsh June 18, 2018 Richard Crosby July 16, 2018 Aaron Printup August 20, 2018 Victoria Seals September 17, 2018 Wendy Dankey October 15, 2018 Dennis Walsh November 19, 2018 Richard Crosby 2. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the schedule for Council attendance at Planning Commission meetings during 2018. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to approve the schedule for Council attendance at Planning Commission meetings during 2018. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: 5b)X Approved By: -1 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Resolution Designating Polling Places for the 2018 State Primary and State General Election Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval for a resolution to designate polling place locations for the 2018 Primary and General Election. 2. Background. Cities are now required to designate polling places by December 31 of each year, even if nothing has changed. Also, this is the case in spite of 204B.11, Subd. 3. Essentially, polling place designations are effective until changed, but they also must be designated by December 31 of every year. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Resolution Designating Polling Places for the 2018 State Primary and State General Election. Exhibit Exhibit A. Resolution Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -'bg CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR THE 2018 STATE PRIMARY AND STATE GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 204B.16, subd.l requires the City Council, by ordinance or resolution, to designate polling places for the upcoming year; and WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made at least 90 days before the next election if one or more of the authorized polling places becomes unavailable for use; and WHEREAS, changes to the polling place locations may be made in the case of an emergency when it is necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; and WHEREAS, the state primary is August 14, 2018 and the state general election is November 6, 2018. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Orono City Council hereby designates the following polling places for elections conducted in the city in 2018: Precinct 1 Long Lake Fire Station 340 Willow Drive North Orono, MN 55356 Precinct 2 Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3745 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Precinct 3A Calvary Memorial Church 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 Precinct 4A Orono Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate a replacement location meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling place designated in this Resolution that becomes unavailable for use by the City; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate an emergency replacement polling place meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling place designated in this Resolution when necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is directed to send a copy of this resolution and any subsequent polling place designations to the Hennepin County Elections Office. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 13th day of November, 2017. Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 8 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Public Works Maintenance Worker Appointment Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of the agenda item is to gain Council approval to appoint a new Maintenance Worker within Public Works. 2. Background. The Public Works Department has six full time maintenance worker positions. The maintenance worker positions are critical to meet current service needs and is essential to City operations. One position is currently unfilled. 3. Recruitment. The selection process for the vacant position has been completed. The process involved application screening, an interview panel, and aptitude test and reference checking. 4. Recommended Candidate. The top candidate is Mr. Brandon Maurer. Brandon possesses a positive attitude and willingness to learn new things. I believe he will be an asset to the Public Works Department and City. 5. Recommended Compensation. I recommended that Mr. Maurer be appointed to the position of Public Works Maintenance Worker effective November 27, 2017. a. Salary. Starting salary of $22.77/hour (Grade 7, Step Start) b. Vacation. Starting vacation to be earned at a rate or 10 days (80 hours) per year COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint Brandon Maurer as a Public Works Maintenance Worker. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 9 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: ADA Transition Plan Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is for Council to review and adopt the City's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. 2. Background. The City of Orono does not have an ADA Transition Plan. All local Governments are required to meet the general requirements of Title II of the American Disabilities Act (ADA). To accomplish this they are required to conduct a Self -Evaluation of all programs; policies/procedures; maintenance practices; and infrastructure; and identify those that are inconsistent with current ADA Standards. In addition, local governments are required to develop a Transition Plan which: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. Title II of ADA pertains to the programs, activities and services that public entities provide. Title II of ADA provides that, "...no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity." (42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130) As a provider of public transportation services and programs, the City of Orono must comply with this section of the Act as it specifically applies to local governments. In May of 2017 Council authorized Staff and Bolton and Menk to Prepare and ADA plan. 3. Project Scope. The development of the transition plan included: Data Collection and Analysis of existing transportation and access features, facilitation of public involvement and input in to the process, self-evaluation/ analysis of the data collected and input received, the writing of the Transition Plan, and the incorporation of the data collected into the city's asset management system. 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend the council adopt the attached ADA Transition Plan. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the Orono ADA Transition Plan. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft ADA Transition Plan Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: -TV QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 1960 Premier Drive Mankato, MN 56001 P: 507-625-4171 F: 507-625-4177 Table of Contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 A. Transition Plan Need and Purpose........................................................................ 1 B. ADA and its Relationship to Other Laws................................................................ 1 C. Agency Requirements............................................................................................ 1 H. Self-Evaluation.................................................................................................................... 2 A. Overview................................................................................................................ 2 B. Summary................................................................................................................3 III. Policies and Practices.......................................................................................................... 3 A. Previous Practices.................................................................................................. 3 B. Policy......................................................................................................................4 IV. Implementation Plan.......................................................................................................... 5 A. Priority Areas......................................................................................................... 5 B. External Agency Coordination............................................................................... 5 C. Schedule.................................................................................................................5 V. ADA Coordinator................................................................................................................. 6 VI. Implementation Schedule................................................................................................... 6 VII. Public Outreach................................................................................................................... 6 VIII. Grievance Procedure.......................................................................................................... 6 IX. Monitor the Progress.......................................................................................................... 7 Appendix Appendix A: Self -Evaluation Appendix B: ADA Transition Plan Projects referenced from the City of Orono Capital Improvements Plan Appendix C: Public Outreach Results Appendix D: Greivance Procedure Appendix E: Contact Information Appendix F: ADA Design Standards and Procedures Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Table of Contents [City of Orono ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan] 1 [C13.114100] i I. INTRODUCTION A. Transition Plan Need and Purpose The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. ADA consists of five titles outlining protections in the following areas: 1. Employment 2. State and local government services 3. Public accommodations 4. Telecommunications 5. Miscellaneous Provisions Title II of ADA pertains to the programs, activities and services public entities provide. As a provider of public transportation services and programs, The City of Orono must comply with this section of the Act as it specifically applies to public service agencies. Title II of ADA provides that, "...no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity." (42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130) As required by Title II of ADA, 28 CFR. Part 35 Sec. 35.105 and Sec. 35.150, The City of Orono has conducted a self-evaluation of its facilities within public rights-of-way and has developed this Transition Plan detailing how the organization will ensure that all of those facilities are accessible to all individuals. B. ADA and its Relationship to Other Laws Title II of ADA is companion legislation to two previous federal statutes and regulations: the Architectural Barriers Acts of 1968 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 is a Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a Federal law that protects qualified individuals from discrimination based on their disability. The nondiscrimination requirements of the law apply to employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. Title II of ADA extended this coverage to all state and local government entities, regardless of whether they receive federal funding or not. C. Agency Requirements Under Title II, The City of Orono must meet these general requirements: • Must operate their programs so that, when viewed in their entirety, the Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Introduction [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 1 programs are accessible to and useable by individuals with disabilities (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150). • May not refuse to allow a person with a disability to participate in a service, program or activity simply because the person has a disability (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130 (a). • Must make reasonable modifications to policies, practices and procedures that deny equal access to individuals with disabilities unless a fundamental alteration in the program would result (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b • May not provide services or benefits to individuals with disabilities through programs that are separate or different unless the separate or different measures are necessary to ensure that benefits and services are equally effective (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b)(iv) & (d). • Must take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others (29 C.F.R. Sec. 35.160(a). • Must designate at least one responsible employee to coordinate ADA compliance [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a)]. This person is often referred to as the "ADA Coordinator." The public entity must provide the ADA coordinator's name, office address, and telephone number to all interested individuals [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a • Must provide notice of ADA requirements. All public entities, regardless of size, must provide information about the rights and protections of Title II to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, employees, and other interested persons [28 CFR Sec. 35,106]. The notice must include the identification of the employee serving as the ADA coordinator and must provide this information on an ongoing basis [28 CFR Sec. 104.8(a)]. • Must establish a grievance procedure. Public entities must adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(b)]. This requirement provides for a timely resolution of all problems or conflicts related to ADA compliance before they escalate to litigation and/or the federal complaint process. This document has been created to specifically cover accessibility within the public rights-of-way and does not include information on City programs, practices, or building facilities not related to public rights-of-way. II. SELF-EVALUATION A. Overview The The City of Orono is required, under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and 28CFR35.105, to perform a self-evaluation of its current transportation infrastructure policies, practices, and programs. This self-evaluation identifies what policies and practices impact accessibility and examine how the City implements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Self -Evaluation [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 2 these policies. The goal of the self-evaluation is to verify that, in implementing the City's policies and practices, the department is providing accessibility and not adversely affecting the full participation of individuals with disabilities. The self-evaluation also examines the condition of the City's Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route) (PCR/PAR) and identifies potential need for PCR/PAR infrastructure improvements. This will include the sidewalks, curb ramps, bicycle/pedestrian trails, traffic control signals, and transit facilities that are located within the City rights-of-way. The self-evaluation also included park PCR/PAR and accessiblity to certain amenities. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self- evaluation and the remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan. B. Summary In July 2017, the City of Orono conducted an inventory of pedestrian facilities within its public rights-of-way consisting of the evaluation of the following facilities: Pedestrian Access Route/Pedestrian Circulation Route Parks • 3.86 miles of sidewalk • 0 signals • 18 Tables • 93 ped ramps • 0 bus stops • 1 Drinking Fountains • 14 crosswalks • 0 midblock crossing signs • 0 Bathrooms • 6 sidewalk barriers • 0 driveways A detailed evaluation on how these facilities relate to ADA standards is found in Appendix A and will be updated periodically. III. POLICIES AND PRACTICES The City of Orono is required, under Title II of the ADA and 28 CFR 35.105, to perform a self-evaluation of its policies, practices, and programs. The goal of this Self-evaluation is to verify that, in implementing the policies and practices, the City is providing accessibility and not adversely affecting the full participation of individuals with disabilities. The Self- evaluation identifies policies and practices that affect accessibility and examine City implementation of these policies. The Self-evaluation examines the condition of the City's PCR/PARS and identifies any existing infrastructure needs. Accessibility barriers identified in the Self-evaluation are provided in Appendix C. A. Previous Practices Since the adoption of the ADA, The City of Orono has striven to provide accessible pedestrian features as part of the City's capital improvement projects. As additional information was made available as to the methods of providing accessible pedestrian features, the City updated their procedures to accommodate these methods. Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Policies and Practices [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 3 B. Policy The City of Orono's goal is to continue to provide accessible pedestrian design features as part of the City's capital improvement projects. The City has established ADA design standards and procedures as listed in Appendix F. These standards and procedures will be kept up to date with nationwide and local best management practices. The City will consider and respond to all accessibility improvement requests. All accessibility improvements that have been deemed reasonable will be scheduled consistent with transportation priorities. The City will coordinate with external agencies to ensure that all new or altered pedestrian facilities within the City's jurisdiction are ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible. Requests for accessibility improvements can be submitted to the City of Orono's ADA Coordinator. Contact information for ADA Coordinator is located in Appendix E. Maintenance of pedestrian facilities within the public rights-of-way will continue to follow the policies set forth by the City . A breakdown of relevant policies can be seen in Appendix A which includes the following: • Pavement Management Plan • Snow and Ice Mnaagement Policy • Street Maintenance Policy New Construction All new street construction projects with pedestrian accommodations will be designed and constructed to conform with the most current ADA guidance and design practices to the maximum extent feasible. Reconstruction Projects: All City street reconstruction projects with pedestrian accomodations will be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current ADA guidance and design practices to the maximum extent feasible. Rehabilitation/Resurfacing projects All City rehabilitation and resurfacing projects will include accessible pedestrian curb ramps as needed to provide access to existing pedestrian facilities (i.e. walks/trails) at locations where they do not currently exist. Improvements to existing pedestrian ramps will be addressed on a case by case basis. High priority areas such as those in close proximity to specific land uses (i.e. schools, government offices, and medical facilities) will be given additional consideration. Improvements will be undertaken at the discretion of the City Public Works Director. Stand Alone Proiects. As grant funding opportunities are available, independent ADA projects may be undertaken by the City. A brief engineering study will be performed where candidate sites will be evaluated on facility condition, pedestrian volumes, public safety, public benefit and improvement costs as well as the ability to provide Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Policies and Practices [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 4 alternative barrier removal options. IV. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN A. Priority Areas The City of Orono identified specific locations as priority areas for planned accessibility improvement projects. These areas have been selected due to their proximity to specific land uses consistent with higher levels of pedestrian traffic, from the receipt of public comments, as well as areas exhibiting high levels of non- compliance. The priority areas as identified in the 2017 self-evaluation will be programmed into Orono's CIP as project needs arise and/or public preference dictates. Priority locations are placed in priority raking and as follows: Pedestrian ramp infrastructure and pedestrian ramps surrounding the Old Crystal Bay Road/Kelley Parkway intersection and points along the western portion of Kelley Parkway. This area is in close proximity to area schools and the Orono City Hall while also exhibiting a high occurrence of ADA non- compliance. 2. Pedestrian ramp infrastructure at the intersection of 6t" Avenue and Willow Drive. 3. Pedestrian ramp infrastructure along Brown Road including its intersections with Salem Court and Sugarwood Drive. 4. Pedestrian ramp infrastructure locations along Old Crystal Bay Road at its intersections with Watertown Road and Deer Run Trail. 5. Pedestrian ramps infrastructure at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. 6. Pedestrian ramps infrastructure at the intersection of Livingston Avenue and Blaine Avenue Additional priority will be given to any location where an improvement project or alteration was constructed after January 26, 1991, and accessibility features were omitted. B. External Agency Coordination Many other agencies are responsible for pedestrian facilities within the jurisdiction of the City of Orono. The City will coordinate with those agencies to track and assist in the facilitation of the elimination of accessibility barriers along their routes. C. Schedule Each year the City of Orono will program improvements into Capital Improvement Projects. The City has set the following schedule goals for improving the accessibility of its pedestrian facilities within the City's jurisdiction: After 5 years, 100% of accessibility features that were constructed after January 26, 1991, would be ADA compliant. Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Implementation Plan [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 5 After 10 years, 100% of accessibility features within the priority areas identified by City staff would be ADA compliant. After 20 years, 100% of accessibility features within the jurisdiction of City would be ADA compliant. Improvements will be coordinated with the City's annual budget and 5 -year Capital Improvements Plan, and its long-term maintenance effort. V. ADA COORDINATOR In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(a), the City of Orono has identified an ADA Title II Coordinator to oversee the City's policies and procedures. Contact information for this individual is located in Appendix E. VI. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The City of Orono will utilize two methods for upgrading pedestrian facilities to the current ADA standards. The first and most comprehensive of the two methods are the scheduled street and utility improvement projects. All pedestrian facilities impacted by these projects will be upgraded to current ADA accessibility standards. The second method is the stand alone sidewalk and ADA accessibility improvement project. These projects will be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) on a case by case basis as determined by the City of Orono staff. The City CIP, which includes a detailed schedule and budget for specific improvements, is included in Appendix B . VII. PUBLIC OUTREACH The City of Orono recognizes that public participation is an important component in the development of this document. Input from the community has been gathered and used to help define priority areas for improvements within the public rights-of-way of The City of Orono. Public outreach for the creation of this document consisted of the following activities: • Grievance Procedure: In compliance with 28 CFR 35.107, the City has established the grievance procedure to take future comments and concerns for the City. This can be seen in Appendix D and is further detailed in Section VIII below. • City Website: This document was available for public comment online between the dates of October 6, 2017 to October 27, 2017. There were no comments received from the public through this effort. Information regarding the public outreach activities are located in Appendix C. VIII. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, each agency is required to publish its responsibilities in regards to the ADA. A draft of this public notice is provided in Appendix Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. ADA Coordinator [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 6 D. If users of The City of Orono facilities and services believe the City has not provided reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance. In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City has developed a grievance procedure for the purpose of the prompt and equitable resolution of citizens' complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances. This grievance procedure is outlined in Appendix D. IX. MONITOR THE PROGRESS This document will be updated as needed to reflect the City of Orono's approach to complying with ADA and providing accessible pedestrian infrastructure. The appendices in this document will be updated periodically to account for improvements , while the main body of the document will be updated within three to five years with a future update schedule to be developed at that time. With each main body update, a public comment period will be established to continue the public outreach. Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Monitor the Progress [Project Title] I [BMI project number] Page 7 Appendix A: Self -Evaluation I. Appendix A: City of Orono, MN Self -Evaluation A. Review of Policies and Practices The City's policies and practices include any City, department, or division policies and practices that direct staff in its daily work activities. Policies and practices that relate to accessibility and ADA conformance include: 1. Streets The City of Orono owns nearly 50 miles of roadway that it is responsible for maintaining. The Public Works Street Department conducts reactive and preventative maintenance activities to keep roads in the best condition possible. In addition the City is responsible for undertaking larger capital projects to ensure the long-term use and viability of its roadway infrastructure as a transportation system. The following policies are maintained by the City of Orono pertaining to streets: ■ Pavement Management Plan ■ Snow and Ice Management Policy ■ Street Maintenance Policy a) Pavement Management Plan To that end the City Council approved a Pavement Management Plan in 2014 laying out the requirements for the next 10 years. The Plan contains identification and improvement priorities for the City's recreational trail system as follows: The City has nearly 3 miles of recreational trail that it owns and maintains. These trail sections are as follows: • Kelley Parkway — Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Drive • County Road 6 — Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Drive • Willow Drive — Kelley Parkway to County Road 6 • Brown Road — City Limits (Long Lake) to County Road 6 • Ferndale — Luce Line Trail to County Road 6 Based on the current condition of the trails, it is anticipated that the following improvements will be needed over a ten year period: • Removing and replacing settled trail sections • Removing and replacing severely cracked trail sections • Fog sealing b) Snow and Ice Management A.1 The Public Works Street Division manages snow removal and ice control, which includes both salting and sanding on public city streets. The City of Orono has approximately 50 miles of roads, as well as some trails and municipal parking lots which are maintained by the Public Works Department from early November to late March or as determined by Mother Nature. Service is provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. After hours staff is limited, unless a snow emergency is declared. What is Plowed by the City? • All public City Streets in Orono • Municipal Parking Lots • Sidewalks in the Navarre Area • Some Trails What is not Plowed by the City? • County Roads - These are plowed by Hennepin County. • Private Roads - These are maintained by the homeowners association, or designated responsible party. When do Plowing/Sanding Commence? Orono Police Department monitors roads and contacts the Public Works Department when conditions warrant snow and ice control, including: • Snowfall accumulation of 2" or more, or if conditions warrant. • Accumulation of drifting snow. • Ice and/or freezing rain which affect road conditions. Once any of these conditions apply the goal is to have all the streets plowed within 12 hours after a snowfall. Intersection cleanup and plowing back of snow banks occur within several days of the snowstorm. Normally plow operators will begin plowing at 4:00 a.m. to have the major streets plowed before the morning rush hour. If conditions warrant, the plow operators may plow all through the night. c) Street Maintenance Policy The Street Maintenance Policy contains provisions for the maintenance of the following items: • Streetlights • Park Maintenance • Street Maintenance • Street/Traffic Signs • Street Sweeping A.2 • Traffic Signals 2. City of Orono's Comprehensive Plan Orono's 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan, also known as the Community Management Plan, was formally adopted by the Orono City Council on September 13, 2010. At the time of this plan's development, the City was in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan for the 2040 planning horizon. The Plan will include language in the Transportation Section pertaining to ADA compliance in public rights-of-way. R. Review of Programs During July 2017, the City of Orono inventoried pedestrian ramps and sidewalks within the public rights-of-way and within parks. The City also identified which traffic signals include Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS). 1. Pedestrian Ramps The City of Orono has 93 pedestrian ramps within its public rights-of-way. These inventoried for ADA compliance based on MnDOT's standards. 36 of the City's pedestrian ramps were identified as compliant and 56 as non-compliant. Pedestrian ramps are identified as compliant if they meet the following criteria: • Running slope is less than 8.34° • Cross slope is less than or equal to 2° • Landing area is greater than or equal to 4 -feet by 4 -feet • An ADA -compliant detectable warning is present (i.e. truncated domes) Pedestrian ramps not meeting this criteria are candidates for future projects. The timeline for modification of each of these pedestrian ramps will depend on its priority ranking, correlation to planned projects, reasonable accommodation requests, and available funding. Pedestrian ramp replacement is anticipated to cost approximately $4,000 per ramp which includes design and construction of one ramp. A detailed list of these non-compliant locations may be obtained by request to the City of Orono ADA Coordinator. Compliant and non-compliant pedestrian ramp locations are identified in Figure A.1. A.3 C. Sidewalks The sidewalk facilities within city rights of way and along county roadways inside of Orono were inventoried and evaluated to determine existing characteristics such as length and type (concrete or bituminous) and to identify existing defects and obstructions. All sidewalk segments in the City of Orono public rights-of-way received a condition rating of one through four based on level of compliance. Sidewalks with condition ratings of one and two indicate varying levels of ADA compliance and those with ratings of three or four indicate varying levels of non- compliance. Table A.1 identifies the results of the sidewalk inventory condition ratings and affected lengths of sidewalk in the City meeting that criteria. Table A.1- Sidewalk Inventory ADA -Compliance Condition Rating Condition Criteria Length (mis) Location Description Sidewalk is smooth with no vertical Remediation 1 2.06 Compliant $660 discontinuities short of roadway Path Bottlenecks to 30 2 Sidewalk has vertical discontinuities less than 1.73 inches 1/2 inch, and the surface is still passable Avenue and Livingston Avenue Sidewalk discontinuities 3 Sidewalk has vertical discontinuities more 0.07 $1,000 than 1/2 inch Non -Compliant Sidewalk is crumbling, has many cracks, and is 4 unpassable for wheelchairs in many spots 0 Compliant and non-compliant sidewalk infrastructure is identified in Figure A. 2. The most commonly identified deficiencies during the sidewalk inventory are shown in Figure A.3. Sidewalks with condition ratings of 3 or 4 will be identified as candidates for future projects. The timeline for replacement of these sidewalks will depend on priority ranking, correlation to planned projects, reasonable accommodation requests, and available funding. A detailed list of these instances may be obtained upon request to the City of Orono ADA Coordinator. Along with a general condition rating, sidewalks were also inventoried for the presence of obstructions. Table A.2 identifies obstructions collected along sidewalks with planning -level cost estimates for removing the obstruction and a location description. Figure A.4 provides examples of obstructions that are commonly found along sidewalks. Table A.2 - Sidewalk Inventory Planning -Level Cost for Obsruction Location Description Remediation Sidewalk ends 20 feet Gazebo connection in Crystal Bay Playground $660 short of roadway Path Bottlenecks to 30 Park near Navarre water tower at corner of Blaine $500 inches Avenue and Livingston Avenue Sidewalk discontinuities 200feet south of Cobblestone Court on sidewalk $1,000 along Willow Drive A.4 D. Park PCR/PAR and Amenities The City of Orono also included an inventory of the PCR/PAR within community parks as well as choice park amenities to ensure all users are equally accommodated. Five parks were inventoried including: • Crystal Bay Park • Bederwood Park • Hackberry Park • Antoine Park • Navarre Park • Livingston Park 335 feet of path was inventoried as part of the PCR/PAR in area parks. The following amenities were evaluated for ADA compliance as well: • Trails Bathrooms • Tables • Drinking Fountains A.5 51 W oil 13 15 ice IN oil Figure A.3 — Commonly Identified Deficiencies Vertical Discontinuity Cross Slope Spalling Horizontal Discontinuity Cracking Vegetation Vertical Slope M Figure A.4 — Sidewalk Obstruction Examples Fire Hydrant Trathe Signal Handhole Utility Pole Lighting Pole Traffic Signal Pole Vdater Gate Valve Appendix B: ADA Transition Plan Projects referenced from the City of Orono Capital Improvements Plan I. Appendix B: City of Orono Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Projects That Include (Consider) Accessible Pedestrian Infrastructure The City of Orono updates the CIP annually. This document can be accessed through the City's website at the following link: http://www.ci.orono.mn.us The following projects from the CIP that may include accessible pedestrian infrastructure considerations: CIP Area Proposed Improvements Building CIP • Public Works Parking Lot - $196,000 Community Improvement CIP • County Road 112 Turn Back Project - $794,000 • County Road 15.19 Intersection - $100,000 Public Works — Streets CIP • Reconstruction Projects- ^'$500,000 / yr The city will continue to implement infrastructure and maintenance improvements as part of its long- range capital improvement planning and pavement management plan. With these efforts, the City will incorporate ADA -compliant pedestrian facilities and complete accessible infrastructure improvements as needed to ensure access for all users. ME Appendix C: Public Outreach Results I. Appendix C: Public Outreach Results Input from the community has been gathered and used to help define priority areas for improvements within the public rights-of-way of The City of Orono. Public outreach for the creation of this document consisted of the following activities: • City Website: This document was available for public comment online between the dates of October 6, 2017 to October 27, 2017. There were no citizen responses collected as a result of this effort. However, the grievance procedure (Appendix D) is in place to take future comments and concerns for the City. CA Appendix D: Greivance Procedure I. Appendix D: City of Orono ADA Grievance Procedure In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City has developed the following ADA grievance procedure for the purpose of the prompt and equitable resolution of citizens' complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances. The City understands that members of the public may desire to contact staff to discuss ADA issues without filing a formal grievance. Members of the public wishing to contact the Transition Plan Implementation Engineer should reference the contact information in the Responsible Officials Contact Information section of Appendix B. Contacting staff to informally discuss ADA issues is welcome and does not limit a person's ability or right to file a formal grievance later. Those wishing to file a formal written grievance with The City of Orono may do so by one of the following methods: A. Internet Please visit http://bmi.maps.arcgis.com/apps/GeoForm/index.html?appid=906c442e31134f 25835136b71bcOd72a to file a grievance online. A copy of the The City of Orono Grievance Form is included in this document in Appendix A. B. Telephone Contact The City of Orono's ADA Coordinator listed in the Responsible Officials Contact Information section of Appendix B to submit an oral grievance. The staff person will use the internet to electronically submit the grievance on behalf of the person filing it. C. Paper Submission A paper copy of the City's grievance form is available by request from The City of Orono's ADA Coordinator (contact information in Appendix B). Complete the form and submit it to the City of Orono ADA Coordinator at the address listed. The City of Orono will acknowledge receipt of the grievance to the citizen within 10 working days of the submission. City staff will then provide a response or resolution to the grievance or will provide information on when the citizen can expect a response. If the grievance filed does not fall within the City of Orono's jurisdiction, staff will work with the citizen to contact the agency with jurisdiction. When possible (typically within 60 calendar days or less of the grievance submission) City staff will conduct an investigation to determine the validity of the alleged violation. As a part of the investigation, internal staff will be consulted to fully understand the complaint and possible solutions. The City of Orono staff will contact the citizen to discuss the investigation and proposed resolution. D.1 The City of Orono will consider all grievances within its particular context or setting. Furthermore, the department will consider many varying circumstances including: access to applicable services, programs, or facilities; the nature of the disability; essential eligibility requirements for participation; health and safety of others; and degree to which a potential solution would constitute a fundamental alteration to the program, service, or facility, or cause undue hardship to the City of Orono. Accordingly, the resolution by The City of Orono of any one grievance does not constitute a precedent upon which the City is bound or upon which other complaining parties may rely. Complaints of Title II violations may be filed with the Department of Justice (DOJ) within 180 days of the date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the DOJ. The DOJ may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve violations. For more information, contact: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Disability Rights Section — NYAV Washington, D.C. 20530 www.ada.gov (800) 514-0301 (voice) (800) 514-0383 (TTY) Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the DOJ or any other Federal agency, or to receive a "right -to -sue" letter, before going to court. File Retention The City of Orono shall maintain ADA grievance files on behalf of the City for a period of seven years. D.2 City Orono, MN ADA Grievance Form Instructions: Please fill out this form completely and submit to: City of Orono ADA Coordinator 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Or it can be e-mailed to: aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us Complainant — person filing grievance: Name Home City, State, Zip Code: Cell: Date Address: Work: Email: Representing — person claiming an accessibility issue or alleging and ADA violation (if not the complainant): Name: Address: Home: Work: City, State, Zip Code: Cell: Email: Description and location of the alleged violation and the nature of a remedy sought. If the complainant has filed the same complaint or grievance with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), another federal or state civil rights agency, a court, or others, the name of the agency or court where the complainant filed it and the filing date. Agency or Court: Contact Person: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Phone Number: Date Filed: D.3 Appendix E: Contact Information I. Appendix E: Responsible Officials and Key Department Staff A. Responsible Officials Contact Information 1. City of Orono ADA Coordinator: • Adam Edwards Director of Public Works/City Engineer 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us (952) 249-4600 2. Key Staff: • D1 Goman Supervisor for Streets, Storm Sewers, and Parks 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 dgoman@ci.orono.mn.us (952) 249-4670 E.1 Appendix F: ADA Design Standards and Procedures I. Appendix F: ADA Design Standards and Procedures A. Design Standards City of Orono Engineering Standards and Design Details This section provides information on the latest applicable rules, design guidance, and best practices related to ADA accessibility in the City of Orono. The City adheres to the design details and procedures outlined in the City Standard Plates and Design Details. Documents outlining these can be seen at the following location: http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7BCBFC8FAF-C313-4854-A229- 98A3482257F0%7D/uploads/Standard Plates.Ddf 2. Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), developed by the Access Board, are draft guidelines that address accessibility in the public rights-of-way. Sidewalks, street crossings, and other elements of the public rights-of-way present unique challenges to accessibility for which specific guidance is considered essential. The Access Board is developing these guidelines that will address various issues, including access for visually impaired pedestrians at street crossings, wheelchair access to on -street parking, and various constraints posed by space limitations, roadway design practices, slope, and terrain. PROWAG can be found at http://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/743/nprm.pdf. In 2010 and 2015, as a part of the development of MnDOT's Transition Plan, MnDOT Issued Technical Memorandum 10 -02 -TR -01 Adoption of Public Rights of waV Accessibility Guidance and Technical Memorandum No. 15--02-TR-01 Adoption of Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidance (PROWAG), respectively to their staff, cities, and counties. These memorandums, which have both expired, make the PROWAG the primary guidance for accessible facility design on MnDOT projects. In addition, these technical memorandums can be found on MnDOT's website. See (http://techmemos.dot.state.mn.us/). 3. Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way The Access Board is proposing these accessibility guidelines for the design, construction, and alteration of pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. The guidelines ensure that sidewalks, pedestrian street crossings, pedestrian signals, and other facilities for pedestrian circulation and use constructed or altered in the public right-of-way by state and local governments are readily accessible for pedestrians with disabilities. When the guidelines are adopted, with or without additions and modifications, as accessibility standards in regulations issued by other federal agencies implementing the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act, compliance with these accessibility standards is mandatory. These proposed accessibility guidelines can be found on the Access Board F.1 website (http://www.access-board.gov) under Public Rights -of -Way or at http://www.access- board.gov/attachments/article/743/nprm.pdf. 4. Accessible Public Rights -of -Way Planning and Design for Alterations (August 2007) This report and its recommendations are the work of the Public Rights -of -Way Access Advisory Committee (PROWAAC) — Subcommittee on Technical Assistance and are intended to provide technical assistance only. The report is not a rule and has no legal effect. It has not been endorsed by the U.S. Access Board, the Department of Justice, or the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation. Still it can be a technical advisory source for engineers and technicians who are planning and designing for alterations to pedestrian elements. This document is on the Access Board website (http://www.access- board.gov) or at http://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/756/guide.pdf. 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation Building on the adoption of PROWAG as planning and design guidance for accessible pedestrian facilities, MnDOT has developed additional planning, design, and construction guidance that is available to local agencies. Listed below is information on additional design guidance available. This is not intended to be an exclusive or comprehensive list of ADA guidance, but rather an acknowledgement of guidance staff should consider and a starting point for information on providing accessible pedestrian facilities. The MnDOT Accessibility webpage, which has good information in a variety of subject areas related to ADA and accessibility, can be found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/index.html. The webpage also provides the ability to sign up for ADA policy and design training classes when available and to review material from previous trainings. Curb Ramp Guidelines:.http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/curbramp.pdf ADA Project Design Guide Memo: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/adapromectdesignguidememo.pdf ADA Project Design Guide: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/adaproeectdesignguide.pdf Pedestrian Curb Ramp Details Standard Plans 5-297.250 can be found on MnDOT's website at http://standardplans.dot.state.mn.us/ Driveway and Sidewalk Details Standard Plans 5-297.254 can be found on MnDOT's website at http://standardplans.dot.state.mn.us/ MnDOT's 7000 series Standard Plates, which are approved standards drawings, provide information on standard details of construction and materials related to curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are on MnDOT's website at http://standardplates.dot.state.mn.us/stdplate.aspx F.2 The MnDOT Road Design Manual serves as a uniform design guide for engineers and technicians working on MnDOT projects. The document is available to others (such as Hennepin County) as a technical resource. Chapter 11— Special Designs, includes information on the design of pedestrian facilities. The Road Design Manual can be found at (http://roaddesign.dot.state.mn.us/roaddesign.aspx) MnDOT's Pedestrian Accommodations Through Work Zones webpage, http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/apr.htmI contains information on providing accessibility during impacts due to maintenance or construction activities. B. Design Procedures Intersection Corners The City of Orono will attempt to construct or upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to be consistent with Access Board recommended designs parameters and MnDOT ADA design guidance and procedures to the extent feasible within all capital reconstruction projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for the City to achieve these goals at an intersection corner within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and the intersection corners will be constructed to maximize accessibility to the extent feasible within the project scope. As future projects or opportunities arise, additional improvements at these locations may be incorporated into future projects. The City will strive to ensure that each intersection corner is constructed to be as accessible as possible. 2. Sidewalks / Trails The City of Orono will attempt to construct or upgrade sidewalks and trails to be consistent with Access Board recommended designs parameters, MnDOT ADA design guidance and procedures to the extent feasible within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for the City to achieve these goals within all segments of sidewalks or trails within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and those segments will be constructed to maximize accessibility to the extent feasible within the project scope. As future projects or opportunities arise, additional improvements at these locations may be incorporated into future projects. The City will strive to ensure that every sidewalk or trail is constructed to be as accessible as possible. F.3 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 10 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Pay Request #6 for the Well #4 — Final Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: 1. Purpose. Gain Council authorization for Pay Request #6 for the Well #4. 2. Background. In 2013, the Council authorized Bolton and Menk to perform a comprehensive review and plan for our municipal water system. Bolton Menk provided the review and a plan in February 2014. Part of the plan recommended the construction of Well #4 which would be the second well for the North or Highway 12 Orono Municipal Water System. The well is needed to provide both firm capacity (Redundancy) and increased capacity for future developments. In the fall of 2015 the City completed the purchase of the necessary land upon which to construct the well. In June of 2016 the council awarded the project to Traut Wells. The well and associate work has been completed. 3. Project Scope. The project consists of drilling and installation of a well, piping, electrical, and site work (access road and new gate). 4. Cost. The Traut Wells bid was for $556,468.00. The completed work amounted to $535,908.72. The final pay request is for $56,003.49 which include release of retainages. 5. Funding. This project is funded through the Water Enterprise Fund COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Pay Request No. 6 -FINAL to Traut Wells in the amount of $56,003.49 for the Installation of Well #4. Exhibits Exhibit A. Pay Request #6 Prepared By. f Reviewed By: Approved By: -TV APPLICATK_ AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT Al OCUMENT G702 TO OWNER: PROJECT: WELL NO. 4 KPPLICATION NO: 6 -FINAL Distribution to: CITY OF ORONO x OWNER 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ARCHITECT ORONO, MN 55356 PERIOD TO: 05/31/17 CONTRACTOR FROM CONTRACTOR: VIA ARCHITECT: Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 141 28th Ave South Steve Nelson PROJECT NOS: C13.111233 Waite Park, MN 56387 CONTRACT FOR: NORTH WELL PROJECT CONTRACT DATE: June 29, 2016 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. completed in accordance with the Proposal and Contract Documents, together with insurance, surety and warranty provisions required therein; that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. L ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM 2. Net change by Change Orders 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line l f 2) 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE (Column G on G703) 5. RETA[NAGE: a. 5 %of Completed Work (Column D + E on G703) b. % of Stored Material (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Lines 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703) 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE (Line 4 Less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR Included in above PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate) 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE (Line 3 less Line 6) $ 556,468.00 $ 0.00 CONTRACTOR: 556,468.00 535,908.72 MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC. By:1�-1. _` Date: Slat of Minnesota County of: Steams Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public: My Commission expires: $ 0.00 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT $ 535,908.72_ In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, $ 479,905.23 the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor $ 56,063.49 is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. $ 20,559.28 AMOUNT CERTIFIED ......... .. $ 56,003.49 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Total changes approved in previous months by Owner Total approved this Month TOTALS $0.00 J$0.00 NET CHANGES by Change Order $0.00 (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied. Initial all figures on this Application and onthe Continuation Sheet that are changed to conform with the amount certified.) ARCHITECT: By: Date: 10-23-2017 This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. PAORONO AIA DOCUMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT 1992 EDITION AIA ©1992 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE, N W, WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5292 G702 6/6/2017 Users may obtain validation of this document by requesting a completed AIA Document D401 -Certification of Document's Authenticity from the Licensee. CONTINU TION SHEET AIti ICUMENTG703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT, containing APPLICATION NO: 6 Contractor's signed certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION DATE PERIOD TO ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO 5/31/2017 5/31/2017 C13.111233 A ITEM NO B DESCRIPTION OF WORK C SCHEDULED VALUE D I E WORK COMPLETED F MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) G TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (D+E+F) H % (G + C) I BALANCE TO FINISH (C - G) J RETAINAGE (IF VARIABLE RATE FROM PREVIOUS APPLICATION THIS PERIOD WELL BID DUAL ROTARY dr 1 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION, SITE CLEANUP $37,810.00 $28,357.50 $9,452.50 $37,810.00 100.00% $0.00 $1,890.50 dr 2 DRILL & DRIVE 24" CASING $48,345.00 $54,615,00 $54,615.00 11297% ($6,270.00) 52,730.75 dr 3 DRILL 23" (NOMINAL) OPEN HOLE FROM 204 ITO 500 FT $25,875.00 $4,250.000 $4,250.00 16.43% $21,625.00 $212.50 dr4 IGAMMA LOG $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 100.00% $0.00 $65.00 dr 6 FURNISH & INSTALL 18" CASING $34,675.00 $34,675.00 $34,675.00 100.00% $0.00 $1,733.75 dr 7 GROUT BETWEEN 24" AND 18" CASING $12,075.00 $10,925.00 $10,925.00 90.48% $1,150.00 $546.25 dr 8 HI QUE SCREEN $35,525.00 $32,585.00 $32,585.00 91.72% $2,940.00 $1,62925 dr 9 PACKER WITH GRAVEL DEVICE $2,917.00 $2,917.00 $2,917.00 100.00% $0.00 $145 85 dr 10 FILTER PACK $11,250.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 88.89% $1,250.00 $500.00 dr 11 FURNISH, INSTALL AND REMOVE WELL jDEVELOPMENT EQUIPMENT $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 100.00% $0.00 $225.00 dr 12 DEVELOP WELL SCREEN $26,000,00 $31,20000 _ $31,200.00 120.00% ($5,200.00) $1,560.00 dr 13 FURNISH, INSTALL AND REMOVE TEST PUMP WITH DISCHARGE PIPING $4,850.00 $4,850.00 $4,850.00 10000% $0.00 $242.50 dr 14 ADDITIONAL TEST PUMP INSTALL AND REMOVAL $850.00 _ $0.00 0.00% $850.00 $0.00 dr 15 TEST PUMPING $9,25000 $9,250.000 $9,250.00 100.00% $0.00 $462.50 dr 16 WATER SAMPLING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS $1,250.00 $1,250.000 $1,250.00 100.00% $0.00 $62.50 dr 17 dr 18 TELEVISING SURVEY OF FINISHED WELL DISINFECT THE FINISHED WELL $1,300.00 $125.00 $1,300.00° $125.00 $1,300.00 $125.00 100.00% 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 $6500 $6.25 dr 19 dr 20 dr 21 PITLESS UNIT, ENCLOSURE, PAD, BOLLARDS, AND PIPING IIPUMP AND MOTOR DROP PIPE AND W IRE $51,000.00 $45,000.00 _ $24,000.00 $43,350.00 $45,000.00 $24,000.000 $7,650.00 $51,000.00 $45,000AO $24,000.00 100.00% ° 100.00% 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0..00 $2,550.00 $2,250.00 $1,200.00 Page 1 of 2 A B G SCHEDULED VALUE D WORKCOMPLEI -. F G H I BALANCE .,tETAINAGE TO FINISH (1F VARIABLE C' - C; RA ; k ITEM NO DL ,IP'110X0FWORK MATERIALS PRESENTLY STORED TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED % (G - Q FROM PREVIOUS APPLICATION THIS PERIOD Non -Well C 2 Lump Sum Bid Allowance Non -Well Lump Sum Bid + Allowance $178,571.00 $160,713.90 $13,642.82 (NOT IN D OR E) TO DATE (D+E+F) $174,356.72 97.64% $4,214.28 $8,717.84 GRAND TOTALS $556,468.00 $505,163.40 $30,745.32 $0.00 $535,908.72 1 96% $20,559.28 1 $26,795.44 Users may obtain validation of this document by requesting of the license a completed AIA Document D401 - Certification of Document's Authenticity Page 2 of 2 No dr 1 dr 2 U1 T Or ORONO WELL NO. Item Well Bid Dual Rotary MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION, SITE CLEANUP DRILL & DRIVE 24" CASING 4 Unit LS LF JOB # 30US93 Unit Price $37,810.00 $165.00 PAY APPLICATION # 6-FINAL TOTAL BILLING TO Estimated DATE PAY APP 6 A rox Qty 1 293 Bid Amount 37,810.00 48,345.00 QuantityPrice 1 3311 37810.00 54615.00 %COMP 100% 113% Quantity 0.25 Price 9452.50 dr 3 DRILL 23" (NOMINAL) OPEN HOLE FROM 204 TO 1500 FT LF $125.00 207 25,875.00 34 4250.00 16% dr 4 GAMMA LOG LS $1,300.00 1 1,300.00 1 1300.00 100% dr 6 FURNISH & INSTALL 18" CASING LF $95.00 365 34,675.00 365 34675.00 100% dr 7 GROUT BETWEEN 24" AND 18" CASING CY $575.00 21 12,075.00 19 10925.00 90% dr 8 IHI QUE SCREEN LF $245.00 145 35,525.00 133 32585.00 92% dr 9 PACKER WITH GRAVEL DEVICE EA $2,917.00 1 2,917.00 1 2917.00 100% dr 10 FILTER PACK CF $25.00 450 11,250.00 400 10000.00 89% dr 11 FURNISH, INSTALL AND REMOVE WELL DEVELOPMENT EQUIPMENT LS $4,500.00 1 4,500.00 1 4500.00 100% dr 12 DEVELOP WELL SCREEN HR $325.00 80 26,000.00 96 31200.00 120% dr 13 FURNISH, INSTALL AND REMOVE TEST PUMP WITH DISCHARGE PIPING LS $4,850.00 1 4,850.00 1 4850.00 100% dr 14 ADDITIONAL TEST PUMP INSTALL AND REMOVAL LS $850.00 1 850.00 dr 15 TEST PUMPING HR $185.00 50 9,250.00 50 9250.00 100% dr 16 WATER SAMPLING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS LS $1,250.00 1 1,250.00 1 1250.00 100% dr 17 TELEVISING SURVEY OF FINISHED WELL LS $1,300.00 1 1,300.00 1 1300.00 100% dr 18 DISINFECT THE FINISHED WELL LS $125.00 1 125.00 1 125.00 100% dr 19 PITLESS UNIT, ENCLOSURE, PAD, BOLLARDS, AND PIPING LS $51,000.00 1 51,000.00 1 51000.00 100% 0.15 7650.00 dr 20 PUMP AND MOTOR LS $45,000.00 1 45,000.00 1 45000.00 100% dr 21 DROP PIPE AND WIRE LF $120.00 200 Non-Well LuTg Sum Bid Allowance C.2 Non-Well Lump Sum Bid + Allowance LS $ 178,571.00 1 24,000.00 178,571.00 1 $556,468.00 200 0.9764 SUB: 24000.00 174356.72 535908.72 100% 98%1 0.0764 SUB: 13642.82 30745.32 TOTAL: 53 5,908.72 TOTAL: 30.745.32 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 11 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3966 — LDK Builders o/b/o Linda Tamosuinas, 1525 Long Lake Blvd, Variances — Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden, Agenda Consent Agenda City Planner Section: Purpose. This application is regarding variances for a rear setback, lot width and lot area. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The 60 -Day review period expires on November 25, 2017. Background. The applicant plans to demolish the existing home and detached garage. The existing detached garage is nonconforming because is it closely abutting the rear and side property lines. The proposed new home will conform to the lake and average lake setbacks. Due to contours of the lot, they are requesting a rear yard setback variance to allow them to be 29.6 feet from the rear property line instead of the standard 50 feet, which is a 20.4 foot encroachment. The applicant stated that positioning the garage further away from the road creates issues with the downward slope of the driveway, creating a hazard in the winter months. A setback variance is requested, therefore lot area and lot width variances will also be needed due to the substandard area and width of the lot. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On October 16th, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 6-0 on a motion approve. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable. Planning staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Prepared By: LO Reviewed By: JBaruhart Approved By: -Sb9 Council Exhibit A 17-3966 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 FILE NO. 78-3966 WHEREAS, on April 23rd, 2017, LDK Builders on behalf of Linda Tamosuinas ("Applicant]"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1525 Long Lake Blvd and legally described as: All of Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21 which lies west of a line drawn north and south through said lot and midway between the east and west line of said lot, in Albee's Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow a rear yard setback variance; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow a lot width variance; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow a lot area variance; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on November 1311, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3966. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1A Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.35 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 90 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Rear yard setback b. Lot area c. Lot width 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...... The lot width and lot area variances requested are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear setback variance is in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. The lot includes challenges with the steep slope and the curved right of way limited the building envelope of the property. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. within the rear yard setback seems reasonable as the property is steep and could become hazardous in the winter months if the garage is moved to meet the setback by creating a longer and steeper driveway. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The location of the home with attached garage on the Property, the steepness of the lot, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the property create difficulties for developing the Property and The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The lot area and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will adversely impact the adjacent property owners. The neighboring parcel has a home much closer to the road than it proposed. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The small building envelope with the substandard lot, the curved right-of-way along the rear property line and the steepness of the lot create difficulties unique to the property. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." Due to the steepness of the lot the garage should be set closer to the road to create a manageable access for the driveway. Moving the garage further from the road creates a steeper and longer driveway which could become hazardous in the winter months limited the accessibility and use of the property. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The substandard area and width of the Property; steepness of the lot and the curved road long the rear property line create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow rear yard setback, lot area and lot width, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated September 11, 2017 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 13, 2018). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13 day of November, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Existing Elevations i 1 9a1.a 9g2 ---------------- - --- LONGLA KE 9g3 4 �� SMH .. N81 o Rim ! s a� y�80 980.8 -- X44.5 8 � �8� 984, 9>>,8� x 980.7 2 0 \ - 9 r -- a� 3� 0 2 5.7� ONS 9�7 \ _ \ ->k, \ \ OHU -' 981.9 x9 O/ \ \ � EX. STRUCTURE Q �' � 6 d" ,_ \\ \ \\x 9801 x oHU 981 4 7 g \ 981.4 9 6'i o v 9 s \ 974.9 4.�97 Si \ w w D. FND Ip 974.0 U \ 2 , %OG 98 984:2xLLJ 98Q U xx Z I / 9, S 0 9- - � I_ BOX T4' d� SMH -97\ I\S -9 98\y \984.8 Rim=9 5.5 :x D _ O 10' B �� \9�A-0 ����\ x 98s S Inv=97�8, 0 7417 A �� 9j" jP co LLJ \ \ ° 99774�0 974.0 y x 9744 x OT _ MAR 14\ �cp 1 _ 973. �.r` q 9 x % 11rr yy U)974.0 � x 97.3.8/ _ _ � �ly�973. o x / I973 I x\ \71.9 O� 1974.1 0 K s 4' w '0, 98 .9x \ 983 95��ISB �� cc 0)I 099972 �PE, \ x 97 .7� \ \ \ / / A �' \ / 9/0.6\��/� �r x 9 I. EL 2�' \ \ �\ z \ `? \ 972.9 \-\ 97 3 \ \C x \ 971.0 x xx \ o 90.6 969.1 EX. DECK / �91 x �6 3 x 970.7 x \ 971.0 k 971.6 \ \U \ I \ LL 969 z w i x 973 9 x / �\ 5 �� 9,2 1 \ \ \\ 66 I 0 97x UI ID \ 970.0 ❑A i'Ln\ \ 0 l \ C- �����\ \ x 966.4 6> 967.41 E�/S o 965.8 \ 967.8 6 S2S �O � � O y ^. \ �97\0 \ \\\�\ 9 65 ��1196� \�9 IAS G �F 981.4 o �\ WOE= ��\S- 965.8 FFE= Fes, x 977.5 8.7 d, \ V) 1.2'/- - 915.3 p ,�' 973.7 \ \ \ FND IP 1/2 151 °j ° 10.1 0.56' W 961.2964.6x 965. Ix \ 9708 x 9 s / 65.\ \ r \3 x N\ U \50.N6 x 964. LLJ w\ \ \ \ \ 1.5'\0.6 0 \\� - \ h� \\ WN� \ 965.1 \ � \ \ z �\ \ x \ x 949. x\S\ i \ \\\i `576 \\ \ \ \1/70 0g I 947.9 ���\ \ \��\ \ \\/ )\365 8 0'�i�� Q\ \ x 947.6 �' 1 5� �J\\ ~ \\ \� \ x LJ \ \ l �/\ 6 �970,4 x971.7 972.3 o¢ I -9471 \ O � I \ x 94 .4 / � 9 LJ 948.4 0 8 %} i` /%45.9 x 96.1 / �� \ \ \ /i�9s \ \\\ \��� \ �� �`I \\\ �`�J,70.1 9 FND IP I/2 I I x 946.3\�\\�\ \\ \ \ \\ U FFE= 94 �. ) 1I \ 9x� \9� /\ \ x 9 \�\\ / \ 9729 9 947.7 '-per 147.2 x-947 0 4 \ \ \ ```���\ \Q\ \\ , \ _ 44. / 94 46x-8446.0 i / \ 95\ \ \\\\\\ \\ w 943.7 \ x\946.1 944. \ �Z 1 9 �\ E,L I6� \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 9Q�946.3 � \ \\ +•\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 869.4 s� \ \ 44� 944.4 x-\ \\ A6� x 946.6 \ g V 946.8 946.7 \ 't\\9 . \ \\\\\ \\ 944.1 \\ S VAAA x 946.3D 94 O�l 4 I\ ���� x 947.4 Y S YYY�I� 00� 9� \3 46.5 943. \ ex�� Proposed Elevations i 1 979.6 981.8 j . ..:A.:::: A.0 981 0 , 98 982. EX. STRUCTCIRE � � m x A 980. x 9� OHU V d� V A X 81.4 0 974.9 7 .7 98 2X 98 \ 9 U ix 9 � OHU ri 984.8 m=9 5.SMH 5 \ \\ x \8S ., L S v=97 9.8x 7 `IV\ - 984 1' \ ^9+7 s7� 1/YOK 983 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED All of Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21 which lies west of a line drawn north and south through said lot and midway between the east and west line of said lot, in Albee's Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1) Site Address: 1525 Long Lake Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota 55356 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (Area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0306F, effective date of November 4th, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 15,482 s.f. - 0.355 acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on HCSD Geodetic Station Name: MICKI which has an elevation of: 1028.877 feet (NGVD29). 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR- lA (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated September 2016. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from the City of Orono found on their web site on the date of September 8th, 2017 and are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 50 feet (Long Lake Blvd) Side: 10 feet Rear: 50 feet Lake: 75 feet Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area per Tier 1 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Map Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. / o , , ` I 1 ` ° °"L� - `� \ a I . \ Existing Elevations Proposed Elevations - ---- o o - ° - r T x 97 . 15.0 a 9 LL -9 \ Garage Floor Elevation = 980.4 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 976.5 x \ First Floor Elevation = 973.7 Pro osed To of Foundation Elevation = 977.0 i • 0 7.0 9 1.. X(9 6.5 X L 2 \ cp \ \ P p 9710 �° 6 ) 9�i 7 5--`-��? � 01 27. 72 9 x 0\97 3 \ '\ \ o Walkout Elevation = 965.8 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 967.0 9 0.6 969.. \ Excavation Estimates / 6 9.3 x 970.7 PRO OSED WALKOUT e \ \ \ \ Dirt to be Removed = 576 Cu. Yd. (7 Cu. Yd. within 75' setback) o 1 J -5..Z5 LONG LAKExBEVb \ 9� x�7 3\ x 969.5 0 9 N� 973. \ 1 \ 981.81 Removed Dirt to be Used for Fill = 243 Cu. Yd. 6,4 d7 A \ x 970.0 97 \ \ Net Dirt to be Removed from Site = 333 Cu. Yd. 10 to \9 a jou 4 �� a \ \ G 967.�I6.5 965.8 'i O \97\0 \ � X0.5 �IV9 o _1 �o6r 49.0 % "1.2. Q i \ \ \ 981.4 R 9 .5� �A �fi� X X(96 .5)X h o O 0) I \ s J- DECK \ S REEN - \ x 977'5 \ U) 1.2 / ` S\c 9k5.3 as 651 I�i PORCH , �Co \\\ \ G FND IP 1/2 0.56' W 961.2 AA 1 964.6x\ 965.Ix�s� \�� \ �� MA� 2� _ "\ 975.1 x 959.6 \g 9s6 0 970 N w 950.6 \\ \\ \ \ \\ 6 \ z \\\964. \ \cc LLJ ca 0 1.5i(9\0.6�� 965.1 \ / 'oma z o\ \ \ 0,9 \ \ \ X 949. x -99\ ;\\�� �\ \ \ t(� L4 \ / 965 8 47 9�` \\ 949.4 6. \ 9\ \ \ x- ~2T94 6 �' � \ �� \d'\� x 970.4 ` --- I Z 5 . \\ /\ \ �, \ 971.7 972.3 944. 943.7 x � 9 1. \ \Q \ `g5Y 3' \\� \ �`I \\\ 970.1 9\\\ \ \ P 1 \ \\\ \ 972.9 \� X \\ \x��\ 944.3 x i x ¢ .I \ -F \ \ \ \ x 946.3 % \ Z \ ELTu) I6 \\ \ \� \ \ \ \ 969.4 Q4\ 944.4 x 46� x 946.6 \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ O/\ 946.7\ \\ \\ R/ /C/ \ \44.1 j ��R�%R \ V\ x 946.3a Oo � /� )� 944.2 �/ Oc)q 46. X� 9 FF ' 943.8 FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCCTT IS AT DM USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 11 h day of S tember, 2017. EMW AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND CHECKED SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF 1 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES DBP THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES David B. Pemberton, PLS Minnesota License No. 40344 8-31-17 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. pemberton@sathre.com SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND Fd WOE V BITUMINOUS M �s \ FFE -s-`-•`- BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv dI SITE (X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT 0 CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 960 O O SURVEY MONUMENT SET (]ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O Y -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT O ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE 0 LIGHT POLE C GAS METER Euc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M A�I� © ) `�'� �� L,i1�°'eJ���r -X-X- A POWER POLE s P IJ I II 111; ��� Q HAND HOLE E FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SANITARY MANHOLE Q Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M CATCH BASIN FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s-`-•`- BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv CABLE TV (X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT 0 CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET (]ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT O ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE 0 LIGHT POLE © GAS METER Euc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND © GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE POWER POLE Q HAND HOLE Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SOIL BORING GAS -GAS UNDERGROUND TREE CONIFEROUS OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY -T- SIGN 972.5 GROUND ELEVATION TREE DECIDUOUS """"""""" RAILROAD TRACKS STORM DRAIN O TELEPHONE MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER MTELEPHONE PEDESTAL >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE 0_ -TRAFFIC SIGNAL TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND t� YARD LIGHT Qu UTILITY MANHOLE UT UTILITY UNDERGROUND ❑A A/C UNIT \ WELL ❑u UTILITY PEDESTAL WATERMAIN TWP:118-RGE.023-SEC.35 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FILE NO. Hennepin County 5035-168 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA LDK BUILDERS, INC. � �IIIMM I�Il�r�l v J w ,' � .' .� a ._ • -. .� - - _ t N y tows, _pN k �14W c_v$ftfW� i aoPATw000R 1 err1witprn ?+ C) OPTIONAL UNDER/GARAGE STORAGE MV.,H I ' °V°I II h xro` iled zox�5 ting CER TIFICA TE OF-1VPVEY FOR LECY BR05, HOME5 LONG LAKE Water Fkv.=944:9 LONG OR IBL9x , 4F.,2x � !85x 97S9x �Bl3Y 78 976 GOCE 91? M"UCL,, 9714, �P =0 0 I DO �_�ryW I till.]L Frst Fbcr =921 BmTnat Fber =OB Lie V Yqm '-"D-&P-P 4 S7EALMEM, LE(5AL PEOC97PTICN �,` Oan m Al of Lot 20 a7d #lot pa -t of Lot 21 d h les betwes7 west of a fre dawn � a7' th SaA -a rpt sad Lot ad midway a D of. im mm� e rt botwe6n #e East a-' West s of Sxv Lot ri ALOES' o tkrufes fuM rrm.ns r Xma9 Dertm adsEw aL LC AU LAIEAOD77CN � 1l-eby certify that th's —y, p/- a rq-rt p-epa ed by me Fie % d act s.pav� a -d that / cm a d/y Registered La -d Z�my wider tree Lows of the State of Nii-esota 14314 LAM 9,RUEYC RF IC DOX Book -Pale 6975 WA94CMALE Sa doa NIEM9 Lbvid E ODc)k Ehp AN5 767-0487 sode F J 767-N99 15 Late Jir 34 2hon Reg % 22414 f=20' Existing Elevations i 1 9a1.a 9g2 ---------------- - --- LONGLA KE 9g3 4 �� SMH .. N81 o Rim ! s a� y�80 980.8 -- X44.5 8 � �8� 984, 9>>,8� x 980.7 2 0 \ - 9 r -- a� 3� 0 2 5.7� ONS 9�7 \ _ \ ->k, \ \ OHU -' 981.9 x9 O/ \ \ � EX. STRUCTURE Q �' � 6 d" ,_ \\ \ \\x 9801 x oHU 981 4 7 g \ 981.4 9 6'i o v 9 s \ 974.9 4.�97 Si \ w w D. FND Ip 974.0 U \ 2 , %OG 98 984:2xLLJ 98Q U xx Z I / 9, S 0 9- - � I_ BOX T4' d� SMH -97\ I\S -9 98\y \984.8 Rim=9 5.5 :x D _ O 10' B �� \9�A-0 ����\ x 98s S Inv=97�8, 0 7417 A �� 9j" jP co LLJ \ \ ° 99774�0 974.0 y x 9744 x OT _ MAR 14\ �cp 1 _ 973. �.r` q 9 x % 11rr yy U)974.0 � x 97.3.8/ _ _ � �ly�973. o x / I973 I x\ \71.9 O� 1974.1 0 K s 4' w '0, 98 .9x \ 983 95��ISB �� cc 0)I 099972 �PE, \ x 97 .7� \ \ \ / / A �' \ / 9/0.6\��/� �r x 9 I. EL 2�' \ \ �\ z \ `? \ 972.9 \-\ 97 3 \ \C x \ 971.0 x xx \ o 90.6 969.1 EX. DECK / �91 x �6 3 x 970.7 x \ 971.0 k 971.6 \ \U \ I \ LL 969 z w i x 973 9 x / �\ 5 �� 9,2 1 \ \ \\ 66 I 0 97x UI ID \ 970.0 ❑A i'Ln\ \ 0 l \ C- �����\ \ x 966.4 6> 967.41 E�/S o 965.8 \ 967.8 6 S2S �O � � O y ^. \ �97\0 \ \\\�\ 9 65 ��1196� \�9 IAS G �F 981.4 o �\ WOE= ��\S- 965.8 FFE= Fes, x 977.5 8.7 d, \ V) 1.2'/- - 915.3 p ,�' 973.7 \ \ \ FND IP 1/2 151 °j ° 10.1 0.56' W 961.2964.6x 965. Ix \ 9708 x 9 s / 65.\ \ r \3 x N\ U \50.N6 x 964. LLJ w\ \ \ \ \ 1.5'\0.6 0 \\� - \ h� \\ WN� \ 965.1 \ � \ \ z �\ \ x \ x 949. x\S\ i \ \\\i `576 \\ \ \ \1/70 0g I 947.9 ���\ \ \��\ \ \\/ )\365 8 0'�i�� Q\ \ x 947.6 �' 1 5� �J\\ ~ \\ \� \ x LJ \ \ l �/\ 6 �970,4 x971.7 972.3 o¢ I -9471 \ O � I \ x 94 .4 / � 9 LJ 948.4 0 8 %} i` /%45.9 x 96.1 / �� \ \ \ /i�9s \ \\\ \��� \ �� �`I \\\ �`�J,70.1 9 FND IP I/2 I I x 946.3\�\\�\ \\ \ \ \\ U FFE= 94 �. ) 1I \ 9x� \9� /\ \ x 9 \�\\ / \ 9729 9 947.7 '-per 147.2 x-947 0 4 \ \ \ ```���\ \Q\ \\ , \ _ 44. / 94 46x-8446.0 i / \ 95\ \ \\\\\\ \\ w 943.7 \ x\946.1 944. \ �Z 1 9 �\ E,L I6� \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 9Q�946.3 � \ \\ +•\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 869.4 s� \ \ 44� 944.4 x-\ \\ A6� x 946.6 \ g V 946.8 946.7 \ 't\\9 . \ \\\\\ \\ 944.1 \\ S VAAA x 946.3D 94 O�l 4 I\ ���� x 947.4 Y S YYY�I� 00� 9� \3 46.5 943. \ ex�� Proposed Elevations i 1 979.6 981.8 j . ..:A.:::: A.0 981 0 , 98 982. EX. STRUCTCIRE � � m x A 980. x 9� OHU V d� V A X 81.4 0 974.9 7 .7 98 2X 98 \ 9 U ix 9 � OHU ri 984.8 m=9 5.SMH 5 \ \\ x \8S ., L S v=97 9.8x 7 `IV\ - 984 1' \ ^9+7 s7� 1/YOK 983 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED All of Lot 20 and that part of Lot 21 which lies west of a line drawn north and south through said lot and midway between the east and west line of said lot, in Albee's Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1) Site Address: 1525 Long Lake Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota 55356 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (Area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0306F, effective date of November 4th, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 15,482 s.f. - 0.355 acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on HCSD Geodetic Station Name: MICKI which has an elevation of: 1028.877 feet (NGVD29). 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR- lA (One Family Lakeshore Residential - 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated September 2016. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from the City of Orono found on their web site on the date of September 8th, 2017 and are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 50 feet (Long Lake Blvd) Side: 10 feet Rear: 50 feet Lake: 75 feet Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area per Tier 1 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Map Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. / o , , ` I 1 ` ° °"L� - `� \ a I . \ Existing Elevations Proposed Elevations - ---- o o - ° - r T x 97 . 15.0 a 9 LL -9 \ Garage Floor Elevation = 980.4 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 976.5 x \ First Floor Elevation = 973.7 Pro osed To of Foundation Elevation = 977.0 i • 0 7.0 9 1.. X(9 6.5 X L 2 \ cp \ \ P p 9710 �° 6 ) 9�i 7 5--`-��? � 01 27. 72 9 x 0\97 3 \ '\ \ o Walkout Elevation = 965.8 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 967.0 9 0.6 969.. \ Excavation Estimates / 6 9.3 x 970.7 PRO OSED WALKOUT e \ \ \ \ Dirt to be Removed = 576 Cu. Yd. (7 Cu. Yd. within 75' setback) o 1 J -5..Z5 LONG LAKExBEVb \ 9� x�7 3\ x 969.5 0 9 N� 973. \ 1 \ 981.81 Removed Dirt to be Used for Fill = 243 Cu. Yd. 6,4 d7 A \ x 970.0 97 \ \ Net Dirt to be Removed from Site = 333 Cu. Yd. 10 to \9 a jou 4 �� a \ \ G 967.�I6.5 965.8 'i O \97\0 \ � X0.5 �IV9 o _1 �o6r 49.0 % "1.2. Q i \ \ \ 981.4 R 9 .5� �A �fi� X X(96 .5)X h o O 0) I \ s J- DECK \ S REEN - \ x 977'5 \ U) 1.2 / ` S\c 9k5.3 as 651 I�i PORCH , �Co \\\ \ G FND IP 1/2 0.56' W 961.2 AA 1 964.6x\ 965.Ix�s� \�� \ �� MA� 2� _ "\ 975.1 x 959.6 \g 9s6 0 970 N w 950.6 \\ \\ \ \ \\ 6 \ z \\\964. \ \cc LLJ ca 0 1.5i(9\0.6�� 965.1 \ / 'oma z o\ \ \ 0,9 \ \ \ X 949. x -99\ ;\\�� �\ \ \ t(� L4 \ / 965 8 47 9�` \\ 949.4 6. \ 9\ \ \ x- ~2T94 6 �' � \ �� \d'\� x 970.4 ` --- I Z 5 . \\ /\ \ �, \ 971.7 972.3 944. 943.7 x � 9 1. \ \Q \ `g5Y 3' \\� \ �`I \\\ 970.1 9\\\ \ \ P 1 \ \\\ \ 972.9 \� X \\ \x��\ 944.3 x i x ¢ .I \ -F \ \ \ \ x 946.3 % \ Z \ ELTu) I6 \\ \ \� \ \ \ \ 969.4 Q4\ 944.4 x 46� x 946.6 \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ O/\ 946.7\ \\ \\ R/ /C/ \ \44.1 j ��R�%R \ V\ x 946.3a Oo � /� )� 944.2 �/ Oc)q 46. X� 9 FF ' 943.8 FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCCTT IS AT DM USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 11 h day of S tember, 2017. EMW AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND CHECKED SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF 1 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES DBP THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES David B. Pemberton, PLS Minnesota License No. 40344 8-31-17 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. pemberton@sathre.com SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND Fd WOE V BITUMINOUS M �s \ FFE -s-`-•`- BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv dI SITE (X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT 0 CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 960 O O SURVEY MONUMENT SET (]ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O Y -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT O ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE 0 LIGHT POLE C GAS METER Euc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M A�I� © ) `�'� �� L,i1�°'eJ���r -X-X- A POWER POLE s P IJ I II 111; ��� Q HAND HOLE E FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SANITARY MANHOLE Q Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M CATCH BASIN FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s-`-•`- BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv CABLE TV (X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT 0 CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET (]ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -o -o -o -o -o- GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT O ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE 0 LIGHT POLE © GAS METER Euc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND © GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE POWER POLE Q HAND HOLE Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SOIL BORING GAS -GAS UNDERGROUND TREE CONIFEROUS OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY -T- SIGN 972.5 GROUND ELEVATION TREE DECIDUOUS """"""""" RAILROAD TRACKS STORM DRAIN O TELEPHONE MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER MTELEPHONE PEDESTAL >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE 0_ -TRAFFIC SIGNAL TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND t� YARD LIGHT Qu UTILITY MANHOLE UT UTILITY UNDERGROUND ❑A A/C UNIT \ WELL ❑u UTILITY PEDESTAL WATERMAIN TWP:118-RGE.023-SEC.35 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FILE NO. Hennepin County 5035-168 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA LDK BUILDERS, INC. � tows, _pN k �14W c_v$ftfW� i aoPATw000R 1 err1witprn ?+ C) OPTIONAL UNDER/GARAGE STORAGE MV.,H I ' °V°I II h xro` iled zox�5 ting CER TIFICA TE OF-1VPVEY FOR LECY BR05, HOME5 LONG LAKE Water Fkv.=944:9 LONG OR IBL9x , 4F.,2x � !85x 97S9x �Bl3Y 78 976 GOCE 91? M"UCL,, 9714, �P =0 0 I DO �_�ryW I till.]L Frst Fbcr =921 BmTnat Fber =OB Lie V Yqm '-"D-&P-P 4 S7EALMEM, LE(5AL PEOC97PTICN �,` Oan m Al of Lot 20 a7d #lot pa -t of Lot 21 d h les betwes7 west of a fre dawn � a7' th SaA -a rpt sad Lot ad midway a D of. im mm� e rt botwe6n #e East a-' West s of Sxv Lot ri ALOES' o tkrufes fuM rrm.ns r Xma9 Dertm adsEw aL LC AU LAIEAOD77CN � 1l-eby certify that th's —y, p/- a rq-rt p-epa ed by me Fie % d act s.pav� a -d that / cm a d/y Registered La -d Z�my wider tree Lows of the State of Nii-esota 14314 LAM 9,RUEYC RF IC DOX Book -Pale 6975 WA94CMALE Sa doa NIEM9 Lbvid E ODc)k Ehp AN5 767-0487 sode F J 767-N99 15 Late Jir 34 2hon Reg % 22414 f=20' Council MINUTES OF THE Exhibit C ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING #17-3966 Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 3. #17-3966 LDK BUILDERS ON BEHALF OF LINDA AND DARRELL TAMOSUINAS, 1525 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, VARIANCES, 6:33 P.M. — 6:39 P.M. Scott Koppandraye, LDK Builders, and Darrell and Linda Tamosuinas, Applicants, were present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance, lot area and lot width variances in order to build a new home that will be located 29.6 feet from the rear property line. The lot is substandard. The applicant plans to demolish the existing home and detached garage. The existing detached garage is nonconforming due to its close proximity to the property line. Due to the contours of the lot, they are requesting a rear yard setback variance to allow them to be 29.6 feet away from the street side of the lot instead of the standard 50 feet, which is a 20.4 foot encroachment. The applicant states that positioning the garage further away from the road creates issues with the downward slope of the driveway, creating a hazard in the winter months. Included in the memo is a lot analysis, which goes along with the setbacks required for this parcel. Also included is an analysis of the practical difficulties. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, width and the rear setback. If the applicant wishes to do that in the future, they might experience challenges as they are currently at 24.6 percent hardcover on the site, with the maximum hardcover being 25 percent. The applicant is not requesting a hardcover variance as part of this application. In addition, the lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot and the curved road creates a small building envelope. The applicant will need to address how water will be managed on the site so it will not direct water to any neighboring properties. Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable and recommends approval contingent on submittal of an updated grading plan to ensure water will not be directed onto neighboring properties. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Scott Koppandraye, LDK Builders, stated their biggest concern was the curvature of the road in the front. The proposed house will sit further back. Thiesse asked if they plan to install stairs down to the lake. Koppandraye indicated there are none currently, and that if that should change at some point, they will reduce the driveway hardcover. Thiesse asked whether that should be addressed now. Oakden stated the applicants are not required to have lake access, but if they choose to add stairs at some point in the future, they should be aware that they are getting close to the hardcover limit. Thiesse asked if they will be meeting the 30 -foot height requirement. Koppandraye indicated they will be. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Thiesse stated there is a definite practical difficulty given the steepness of the lot. Landgrver moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3966, LDK Builders on behalf of Linda and Darrell Tamosuinas, 1525 Long Lake Boulevard, granting of a rear yard setback variance, lot area and lot width variances. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Date Application Received: August 23,d, 2017 Date Application Considered as Complete: September 25th, 2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: November 25th, 2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLo Date: October 16, 2017 Subject: #17-3966, LDK Builders o/b/o Linda Tamosuinas, 1525 Long Lake, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear yard setback, lot area and lot width variances in order to build a new home that will be located 29.6 feet from the rear property line; The lot is substandard, lot width and lot area variances are also requested. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant plans to demolish the existing home and detached garage. The existing detached garage is nonconforming because is it closely abutting the rear and side property lines. The proposed new home will conform to the lake and average lake setbacks. Due to contours of the lot, they are requesting a rear yard setback variance to allow them to be 29.6 feet from the rear property line instead of the standard 50 feet, which is a 20.4 foot encroachment. The applicant stated that positioning the garage further away from the road creates issues with the downward slope of the driveway, creating a hazard in the winter months. A setback variance is requested, therefore lot area and lot width variances will also be needed due to the substandard area and width of the lot. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305- Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1A Required Proposed Front 50' 75' Rear 50' 29.6' Side (West) 10' 10' Side (East) 10' 12' Lakeshore 75' 75' Average Lakeshore This is met. Section 305 - Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 15,482 s.f. (0.35 acre) 90' @ 75' 100' @ OHWL FILE # 17-3966 October 16, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1403- Structural Cover Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 15,482 s.f. (.355 acre) Allowed: 3,096 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,623 s.f. (16%) Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Proposed Overlay District Existing Hardcover Zone Hardcover Hardcover Tier 3,870.5 s.f. 1,870 s.f. 15 s.f. 3,810 s.f. Tier 1 15,482 s.f. (25 %) (12%) w/in 75' (24.6%) Applicable Regulations: Rear Setback Variance (78-305) There is a 50 foot rear setback required for this lot. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home 29.6 feet from the rear yard lot line. Lot Width Variance (Section 78-305 Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's need for a rear setback variance results in the property's inability to conform to #1 above. Therefore, a lot width and area variance is also required in order to develop the property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, FILE # 17-3966 October 16, 2017 Page 3 of 5 subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances requested are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear setback variance is in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. The lot includes challenges with the steep slope and the curved right of way limited the building envelope of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the rear yard setback seems reasonable as the property is steep and could become hazardous in the winter months if the garage is moved to meet the setback by creating a longer and steeper driveway. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The location of the home with attached garage on the Property, the steepness of the lot, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the property create difficulties for developing the Property and C. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lot area and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will adversely impact the adjacent property owners. The neighboring parcel has a home much closer to the road than it proposed. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The small building envelope with the FILE # 17-3966 October 16, 2017 Page 4 of 5 substandard lot, the curved right-of-way along the rear property line and the steepness of the lot create a difficulties unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Due to the steepness of the lot the garage should be set closer to the road to create a manageable access for the driveway. Moving the garage further from the road creates a steeper and longer driveway which could become hazardous in the winter months limited the accessibility and use of the property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The substandard area and width of the Property; steepness of the lot and the curved road long the rear property line create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, width and the rear setback. Staff has done a preliminary review of the height with the submitted document. The proposed house looks to meet the 30 foot height requirements with the draft plans submitted. The applicant is not requesting any variances pertaining to height and shows they can meet this requirement. Also, the applicant is note proposing to add any stairs for lake access. Staff asked for clarified with the applicant and they have noted they are not proposing any lake access, if they wish to in the future the applicant may have challenges with hardcover as they are proposing to be 24.6% with the new home. The applicant is not asking for a hardcover variance. The lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot, the curved road create a small building envelope. Engineer Comments The applicant will need to address how water will be managed so it will not direct water to any neighboring properties. This can be addressed in the grading plan. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Commissioners may wish to ask the applicant to verify that height of the home will FILE # 17-3966 October 16, 2017 Page 5 of 5 meet the City Standards, since only preliminary documents were submitted for staff to review. 2. Commissioners may want ask the applicant about lake access or any future plans to add lake access because of the steepness of the lot. 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable. Planning staff recommends approval contingent on an updated grading plan to ensure water will not be directed onto neighboring properties. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 12 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3972, Jan Gasterland, 1920 Shadywood Road, Variance — Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Consent Agenda Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances for rear setback, side setback, hardcover and structural coverage. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The 60 -Day review period expires on November 25, 2017. Background. The applicant, Jan Gasterland, is proposing to demolish an existing 2 stall 24'x23' detached garage and reconstruct a new 3 stall 26'x34' detached garage. He is proposing to maintain the same 4.3' side and 3.6' rear setbacks as the existing structure which are less than the minimum standard of 15', which requires a variance. They are proposing to maintain the same 45.75% hardcover, which requires a variance because it exceeds the 25% maximum. The applicant is also requesting a structural coverage variance to allow for 20.3% which is 39.4 s.f. over the allowed 20% structural coverage for this lot. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed request and believes the new garage would be a reasonable use of the property. The commissioners feel the larger proposed garage is practical for the property and a nice improvement in the neighborhood. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted unanimously on a motion to approve the request. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends for the City Council to refer to the Planning Commission's recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits References Exhibit A. Draft Resolution PC Exhibits Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit A. Application Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit D. PC Staff Report Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Building Inspector's Email Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map Prepared By:LO Reviewed By: JBarnhart Approved By: -SbV Council Exhibit A 17-3972 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVINGA VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1436,78-1700 and 78-1403 FILE NO. 17-3972 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, Jan Gasterland ("Applicant"), applied for multiple variances from the City Code and on September 25, 2017 the application was deemed complete for the property addressed 1920 Shadywood Road and legally described as: Lot 32. "Shadywood" (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1436 to allow rear and side yard setback for an accessory building; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1700 to allow hardcover of the lot to exceed 25%; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1403 to allow structural coverage of the lot to exceed 20%; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3972. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in thel-R-1 C Zoning District. 3. The Property contains .248 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 57 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Side and rear setback for a detached building b. Hardcover c. Structural coverage 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The applicant is proposing to construct a new detached garage on a residential property which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit a new detached accessory structure in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit a new detached garage within the 15' rear and side setback seem reasonable as the existing CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. garage currently occupies this space, therefore the adjacent properties may not be adversely impacted. The hardcover is also being proposed to remain as the same amount as existing, it seems reasonable to allow this request. The structural coverage increase resulting from the proposed larger garage creates a new encroachment and seems to be a reasonable use. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The location of the garage and hardcover amount were preexisting and not created by the homeowner. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. "The requested variances have the same setbacks and the same hardcover percentage for this lot. The requested variance will increase the structural coverage on the lot. It seems unlikely that the character of the locality will be impacted by the larger structure on the property. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a detached accessory structure for a garage is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The size of the subject property is not conforming to the LR -1C area or width standards. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." This site is unique is that there are currently many existing nonconforming encroachments. This lot is small in size for the LR -1C District. The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing setbacks for the accessory structure and hardcover which does not apply CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. to other parcels. The applicant has indicated a reasonable request pertaining to the expansion for structural coverage. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The applicant has indicated the variances are necessary. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances that meet the same setback as the existing structure and hardcover seem reasonable. The structural coverage variances request will not impair the health or safety of the area and seems to align with the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." While the location of the existing detached structure and the existing hardcover of the lot may support the requested setback variance and hardcover variance; the requested structural coverage variance has been shown to be supported by a demonstrable practical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1436, 78-1700, 78-1403 to allow rear setback, side setback, hardcover and structural coverage, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated August 21, 2017 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 13, 2018). 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13 day of November, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR .IAN GASTERLAND OF LOT 32, "SHADY WOOD" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 9O \P -K '°O ps 66 Ile 1 ' A '0 , i \-P / m I -- - ,/ 89.28'29" E 195.23 P 5.1 DECK ' root `_�1_ S.o XISTING _ FIAGSTONEW�NI. f �3 USE (P> CONC WALKS s'0 01\920 •ynq_ (K) (I) I (A 1 FLOOR BLACKTOP ..iG II 10 FLOOR DRIVEWAY IL)"� #I zs.e -.-, \(C) � 4-96-SETBAOK LINE 182.51—�� 10X it` c' mz G) 1 It LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED Lot 32, "Shady Wood" This survey shows the boundaries and topography of the above described property, the location of an existing house, garage, and other visible "hardcover" thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed garage addition. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 9 iron marker o : Iron marker setnd RECEIVED - Existing contour line SEP 11 ZU1/ 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET oESiG"ED REVISIoh DATE DESCRIPTION GRONBERG 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. I hereby certify mat this plan, specification, or report SCALE 1 8-21.17 REVISED PROPOSED GARAGE was prepared by my or under my direct supervision 1^=20' oRAwN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS and that 12;: duly Licensed Land Surveyor under -- SITE PLANNERS the laws of State of Minnesota. aai[ — — 5.15.17 CHECKED 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-073-0141 GATE S -L -i7 MN LICENSE NUMBER /Z75S 17-285 is Mf --l-MMS141A a,J Oct .�►��� � 12 o o ° f rTl o 0Job o _m CM -_ C).1. ,2Ci `aYr _. fib• . ao. �u 5 9� 4 3 � .1/(-/17' %19 N 1-41 12 o � m �� L) L C BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR .IAN GASTERLAND OF LOT 32, "SHADY WOOD" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 9O \P -K '°O ps 66 Ile 1 ' A '0 , i \-P / m I -- - ,/ 89.28'29" E 195.23 P 5.1 DECK ' root `_�1_ S.o XISTING _ FIAGSTONEW�NI. f �3 USE (P> CONC WALKS s'0 01\920 •ynq_ (K) (I) I (A 1 FLOOR BLACKTOP ..iG II 10 FLOOR DRIVEWAY IL)"� #I zs.e -.-, \(C) � 4-96-SETBAOK LINE 182.51—�� 10X it` c' mz G) 1 It LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED Lot 32, "Shady Wood" This survey shows the boundaries and topography of the above described property, the location of an existing house, garage, and other visible "hardcover" thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed garage addition. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 9 iron marker o : Iron marker setnd RECEIVED - Existing contour line SEP 11 ZU1/ 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET oESiG"ED REVISIoh DATE DESCRIPTION GRONBERG 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. I hereby certify mat this plan, specification, or report SCALE 1 8-21.17 REVISED PROPOSED GARAGE was prepared by my or under my direct supervision 1^=20' oRAwN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS and that 12;: duly Licensed Land Surveyor under -- SITE PLANNERS the laws of State of Minnesota. aai[ — — 5.15.17 CHECKED 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-073-0141 GATE S -L -i7 MN LICENSE NUMBER /Z75S 17-285 is Mf --l-MMS141A a,J Oct .�►��� � 12 o o ° f rTl o 0Job o _m CM -_ C).1. ,2Ci `aYr _. fib• . ao. �u 5 9� 4 3 � .1/(-/17' %19 N 1-41 12 o � m �� L) L C Council MINUTES OF THE Exhibit C ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING #17-3972 Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 6. #17-3972 JAN GASTERLAND, 1920 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 8:20 P.M. — 8:31 P.M. Jan Gasterland, Applicant, was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting rear setback, side setback, hardcover and structural variances. The applicant is requesting a rear setback of 3.6 feet, a side setback of 4.3 feet, and to maintain the existing hardcover on the lot at 45.75 percent. The structural coverage variance is to allow 20.3 percent, which is 39.4 feet above the allowed structural coverage. Oakden noted City Code was recently amended to increase the amount of hardcover to 20 percent. The applicants are proposing to demolish an existing detached garage and reconstruct a new 3 -stall detached garage. They are proposing to maintain the same 4.3' side and 3.6' rear setbacks as the existing structure, which are less than the minimum standard of 15 feet. The new garage will be angled slightly different to create a more conducive access for the vehicles. The new garage will be placed over existing asphalt so it does not alter the hardcover calculations of this parcel. The proposed survey includes a landing and stairs along the east side of the proposed garage, but the applicant has indicated this is no longer included in the scope of the project. The adjacent neighbors have submitted letters indicating they have no objection to the variances. Included in Staff s report is a lot analysis and a practical difficulties analysis. Staff can review that in more detail if the Planning Commission has questions. The small size of the lot and the practical difficulty analysis shows support for the requested side and rear setback and hardcover variances for the new detached garage. An email has been attached for the Planning Commission's review noting additional construction requirements for a structure within five feet of a property line. The Planning Commission may approve some or all of the variance requests; deny one or more of the variances; or approve the side setback, rear setback, and the hardcover variance. Staff recommends the applicant revise their plan to be within the 20 percent structural coverage. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver asked if the removal of the stairs and landing would change the structural coverage. Oakden indicated it would not. Jan Gasterland, Applicant, stated his family has owned this property since 1964 and that he is the present owner. Gasterland stated his intent is to leave the property to his children but in the meantime he would like to replace the existing garage that is falling apart and construct a 3 -stall garage in place of the existing 2 -stall garage. Gasterland stated as it relates to the structural coverage, the calculated lot area varies depending on which survey you look at and that his surveyor shows his north property line at 194 feet. The neighbor's survey to the south shows it at 199 feet and the half -section map shows it at 204 feet. Gasterland stated there are discrepancies and that he will not belabor it but that he would prefer not to reduce the size of the garage. Gasterland noted his neighbors are in support of the proposal. Landgraver asked if there is any other structure on the property that could be removed. Gasterland indicated there is not. Thiesse noted the ordinance recently changed from 15 to 20 percent and that the Planning Commission preferred to stick with the 15 percent. Thiesse stated the City would like to adhere to the 20 percent. Gasterland stated the variance is to allow for a modest 3 -stall garage, which is not out of line with the neighborhood, and that it will be slab on grade. Schoenzeit asked if they will see a variance to attach the garage to the house someday. Gasterland stated they will not. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Lemke commented it seems to be a nice improvement to the neighborhood. Thiesse noted the City did not say they would never grant a variance above 20 percent as part of the ordinance change. Landgraver stated the Planning Commission has encountered this issue of whether a 3 -stall garage is reasonable and that in his view it is. Landgraver stated if the structural coverage limit was still 15 percent, he believes he would still be in support of it but that he is reluctantly in favor of it. Schwingler commented a garage is practical. Date Application Received: 9.11.17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 9.25.17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 11.25.17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: October 16, 2017 Council Exhibit D #17-3972 Subject: 17-3972, Jan Gasterland, 1920 Shadywood Rd, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear setback, side setback, hardcover and structural variances. The applicant is requesting a rear setback of 3.6 feet, a side setback of 4.3 feet, to maintain the existing hardcover on the property that exceeds 25% to 45.75% and structural coverage that exceeds 20% to 20.3% which is 39.4 feet above the allowed structural coverage. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the side setback, rear setback, and hardcover variances. Staff recommends for the Planning Commission to discuss the practical difficulties of the structural coverage variance request. Background The applicant, Jan Gasterland is proposing to demolish an existing 2 stall 24'x23' detached garage and reconstruct a new 3 stall 26'x34' detached garage. They are proposing to maintain the same 4.3' side and 3.6' rear setbacks as the existing structure which are less than the minimum standard of 15', which requires a variance. They are proposing to maintain the same 45.75% hardcover, which requires a variance because it exceeds the 25% maximum. The applicant is also requesting a structural coverage variance to allow for 20.3% which is 39.4 s.f. over the allowed 20% structural coverage for this lot. The proposed survey submitted includes a landing and stairs along the east side of the proposed garage. The applicant has indicated this is no longer in the scope of the project and requested it to be redlined as part of this review. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 and 78-1436 - Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1C Required (Detached Structure) Existing(Detached Structure) Proposed (Detached Structure) Rear 15' 3.6 3.6 Side (North) 15' 4.3 4.3 Side (South) 15' 21' 19' Lakeshore 75' 157' from detached accessory structure FILE # 17-3972 October 16, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-350- Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 12,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 10,823 s.f. (0.248 acre) 57' Section 78-1403- Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 10,823 s.f. (0.248 acre) Allowed: 2,164 s.f. (20%) Proposed Existing: 1,876 (17.3%) Proposed: 2,204 s.f. (20.3%) Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 2,705.75 s.f. 4,952 s.f. 4,952 s.f. Tier 1 10,823 s.f. (25 %) (45.75%) (45.75%) Applicable Regulations: Detached Structure Side and Rear Setback (78-1436 The applicant is proposed to build a new larger detached garage but maintain the same 4.3' side and 3.6' rear setbacks as the already existing garage. The new garage will be angled slightly different to create a more conducive access for the vehicles. Hardcover Coverage (78-1700) The applicant currently has 45.75% hardcover already existing on the parcel. They are changing structural coverage, but they will not be increasing or creating new hardcover with this proposed project. The applicant is requesting to maintain their 45.75% hardcover for the variance request. Structural Coverage (78-1403) The applicant is requesting a 20.3% structural coverage variance which is increased from the existing 17.3% structural coverage. City Code was recently amended to increase the amount of hardcover to 20% structural coverage, which is 2,164s.f. for this site. The applicant has proposed 2,204 sf, 39.4 s.f. over the allowed amount to create a larger detached garage. The proposed garage is being placed over existing asphalt so it does not alter the hardcover calculations of this parcel. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning FILE # 17-3972 October 16, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct a new detached garage on a residential property which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit a new detached accessory structure in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed structural increase is inconsistent with the City's goals. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit a new detached garage within the 15' rear and side setback seem reasonable as the existing garage currently occupies this space, therefore the adjacent properties may not be adversely impacted. The hardcover is also being proposed to remain as the same amount as existing, it seems reasonable to allow this request. The structural coverage increase resulting from the proposed larger garage creates a new encroachment. The Planning Commission should determine if practical difficulties have been satisfied. Practical difficulties for this request have not been submitted or demonstrated to justify the variance. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the garage and hardcover amount were preexisting and not created by the homeowner. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The requested variances have the same setbacks and the same hardcover percentage for this lot. The requested variance will increase the structural coverage on the lot. It seems unlikely that the character of the locality will be impacted by the larger structure on the property. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a detached accessory structure for a garage is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. FILE # 17-3972 October 16, 2017 Page 4 of 5 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The size of the subject property is not conforming to the LR -1C area or width standards. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. This site is unique is that there are currently many existing nonconforming encroachments. This lot is small in size for the LR -1C District. The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing setbacks for the accessory structure and hardcover which does not apply to other parcels. The applicant has not indicated a reasonable request pertaining to the expansion for structural coverage. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has indicated the variances are necessary. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances that meet the same setback as the existing structure and hardcover seem reasonable. The structural coverage variances request does not seem in line with the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. While the location of the existing detached structure and the existing hardcover of the lot may support the requested setback variance and hardcover variance; the requested structural coverage variance has not been shown to be supported by a demonstrable practical difficulty. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis The structural coverage of the lot is proposing to increase from existing 1,876 (17.3%) to 2,204 s.f. (20.3%). Although they are proposing a conforming size of an accessory structure at 884 s.f. the overall structural coverage for this parcel is exceeding the maximum 20% coverage by 40s.f. The applicant has not shown any practical difficulties inherent with the property supporting the increase in structural coverage. The setback variances and hardcover variances are not proposing to change or increase compared to the existing detached garage. The small size of the lot and practical difficulty analysis shows support approving the proposed side and rear setback and hard cover variance for the new detached garage. Engineer Comments A comprehensive review will be done at the time of the building permit. FILE # 17-3972 October 16, 2017 Page 5 of 5 Building Inspector Comments An email attach for your review noted additional construction requirements for a structure within 5 feet of a property line. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. A cursory review of height was done but elevations were not provided to verify the height of the proposed garage compared to the existing garage. Commissioners may want to clarify this point with the applicant to determine if there will be a large visual impact with the proposed new structure. The maximum height allowed is 30' and cannot exceed the height of the principle structure. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Options for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission may approve the some or all of the variance applications. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances, the Commission should provide their findings and practical difficulty analysis supporting the approvals; or 2. The Planning Commission could deny one or more variances; or The Commission could approve the side setback, rear setback, and the hardcover variance but suggest the applicant to revise the plan to work within the 20% structural coverage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Photos Exhibit G. Building Inspector's Email Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 13 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3974, SML Electric o/b/o Bridgewater Bank, 2445 Shadywood Road, Variance — Resolution Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Consent Agenda Development Director Section: 1. Purpose. This action item is to consider a variance that would allow the expansion of a non- conforming sign within the front yard setback. 2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. This application must be acted on by November 24, 2017 3. Background/ Summary. Bridgewater Bank recently completed an overhaul of the existing bank building, and now desire to replace the existing sign and make it more consistent with the construction style and materials of the bank building. The sign is non -conforming as it is within the 10 foot front yard setback. The applicant could replace the sign in kind, but desire to add to the base of the sign with stone accent. The sign increases in width (at the base) and in thickness, requiring a variance. Original plans proposed the sign to be internally lit, but at the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant suggested ground mounted flood lights lighting the sign from below. Plans have been revised to show the flood lighting to be mounted to the sign itself, addressing staff concerns that the light source might be visible for passers-by. 4. Planning Commission comment. The Planning Commission, after the public hearing, had no concerns with the sign as proposed. Their motion to support did include a preference for the sign to be back -lit. There is no prohibition to exterior light a sign, though the light source may not cause heat or glare. Mounting the light source to the sign will block its view from travelers on Shadywood Road. 5. Public Comment. No comments in support or opposition of the variance have been received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt resolution approving the variance to allow for the expansion of the non -conforming sign. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Proposed Lighting Plan Exhibit D. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit E. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: _Sb)R Approved By: -TV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL t A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1466 and 78-1468 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2445 SHADYWOOD ROAD FILE NO. 17-3974 WHEREAS, on August 30, 2017, SML Electrical, OB/O Bridgewater Bank ("Applicant[s]"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 2445 Shadywood Road and legally described on Exhibit A attached, hereinafter, the property. WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1466 and 78-1468 to allow the redevelopment of a non- conforming monument style sign to be located within the 10 foot front yard setback; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3974. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the B-4 Zoning District. 3. The Property contains .57 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 100 feet. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Variance to permit the construction of a sign wider and thickness and width to be located within the 10 yard front yard setback. 5. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicable regulation provides for commercial signage in a manner that does not impact the traveling public due to hindered visibility and visual clutter. Further, the ordinance intends on improving the streetscape by requiring more stable, architecturally significant monument signs in lieu of pylon signs. The variances, if granted, would protect visibility while providing signage similar to monument signs. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject parcel as commercial, the proposed signage supports and is consistent with the intended use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The use of the property is a financial institution. Freestanding signage is a normal and expected accessory structure in commercial settings. The proposed signage, to be located in a conforming location, would require the removal of several parking spaces, possible increasing hard cover. Further, the sign as proposed replaced one in this same location for several decades. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lot was developed in the 1970s, and has been a bank for many decades. The siting of the building and the parking lot was established by previous developers; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Recognizing that signage is a normal improvement in a commercial setting, the proposed signage is intended to compliment the improvements being made on the principal structure while maintaining site visibility at the intersections. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The pattern of development in this area has resulted in buildings and parking areas very close to the traveled portion of the road, this is unique to this neighborhood. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The development of the property pre ordinance, the impact of expansions of County Roads 15 and 19 over the years are unique to the subject parcel. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variances allow for the placement of a sign at a logical location given the constraints of the property due to development patterns, access, and adjacent streets. Signage for commercial property is a right given to all commercial businesses. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. There has been no evidence to suggest that the variances would impact the health, safety, and comfort of adjacent parcels or the city at large. The applicant has proposed a sign slightly wider and thicker than the existing sign, visibility will not be impacted. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Placement of a sign in a conforming location and a conforming style would require complete overhaul/ expansion of the parking lot, which would introduce other issues with the parking lot, including hardcover, stormwater control, access, and lot size. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1466 and 78-1468 to allow the re- construction of the freestanding sign slighting wider and thicker at the base within the 10 foot front yard, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 13, 2018). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL I� Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property Identification Number (PID): 20-117-23-11 -ODI 5 Legally described as follows: Commencing of a paint in Northeasterly line of Lot 2 distance 328.17 feet Southeasterly from Northeast corner of Lot 1 than Southwesterly to a point in Southwesterly (line of County Road 19 being actual, Townsite of Langdon Parte, Hennepin County, Minnesota.) Source,; Hennepin Count} CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Exhibit B 4'-0'' 10'-6" T-0„ T-0" Council 7'-0.. � 22" � Exhibit B CAP STONE DECOR. 17-3974 ■ MATCH COLOR OF TOP DECOR OF BLDG. TOWER � ® PC Exhibit B D/F ALUM. FACE WITH ROUTED OUT COPY 17-3974 BACKED WITHWHITE POLYCARBONATE AND VINYL OVERLAYS PMS 188C BURGUNDY BRIDGEWATE BLAGK PMS 877C =GERBER 3M SILVER VINYL INTERNALLY LIGHTED WITH LEDS BAN K INSET I HINGED ACCESS DOOR. MATCH BLDG. MATERIAL TO SHROUD EXISTING UPRIGHT SUPPORT. CAPSTONE MATCH STONE ON BLDG. 51/2" D/F Alum. face with routed out copy backed with Dotted lines indicates white polycarbonate and vinyl overlays Council Exhibit C 17-3974 Council Exhibit D MINUTES OF THE 17-3974 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 7. #17-3974 SML ELECTRICAL, INC., ON BEHALF OF BRIDGEWATER BANK, 2445 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE, 8:31 P.M. — 8:42 P.M. Pat Lawrence, Applicant, was present. Barnhart stated the applicant is requesting a variance to permit a freestanding pole type sign to be located within the 10 -foot side yard setback. The sign would be located less than two feet from the property line. Barnhart displayed a sketch of the proposed sign. Barnhart noted the dashed lines denote the existing boundary of the sign and that the proposed sign is smaller than the current sign. The reason for the variance is that a portion of the base is wider than existing and the thickness of the sign is wider than existing. In addition, the entire structure is within the 10 -foot setback area and is nonconforming and must be replaced in kind. The average person would likely not notice the difference between the two signs. Staff recommends approval based on the practical difficulties outlined in Staff's report. Thiesse noted the trend has been to have lower signs. Thiesse asked if Staff has any concern about that. Barnhart stated Staff's main concern is that a lower sign will block visibility for the vehicles on the road. Pat Lawrence, Sign Maintenance Lighting, asked if the sign could have up lighting rather than interior lighting. Barnhart stated the concern with exterior lighting would depend on where it would be located and that the impacts to traffic and pedestrians would need to be reviewed. Barnhart stated if the area could be screened, he would not necessarily be opposed to it. Thiesse noted this is a heavily traveled intersection. Thiesse asked if a lighting plan was submitted. Page 1 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lawrence indicated this is a last minute request of the client and that it was initially proposed to be lit up on the interior. Landgraver asked if it is an absolute requirement that the lights point up rather than be lit on the interior. Lawrence stated the lights will sit back from the sign a certain distance, be on a post that is approximately two feet high to avoid the snow, and would shine up. Lawrence stated his client would prefer the post mounted lights. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8: 37 p.m. Leskinen stated the request seems pretty straight forward, and that if the Planning Commission recommends approval, it should be with the recommendation that more specifics on the upward lighting be provided prior to going before the City Council meeting. Schoenzeit stated because it is closer to the curb, it is more stuff for the public to interact with. Lemke stated his concern would be how far away the lights would need to be located in order to project onto the sign. Thiesse stated his preference would be a back lit sign. Schoenzeit stated the smaller base would be a preference and that the area should be kept clear as much as possible. Barnhart stated the recommendation would be based on what is before the Planning Commission tonight and that the applicant will need to provide additional information on the lighting. Barnhart indicated he Page 2 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. does have a concern with the upward lighting due to the topography but that Staff can review that if additional information is submitted. Lawrence noted they do have quite a bit of room going both ways from the sign and that if some landscaping was done, people would see the light but not the post. Schoenzeit stated that would defeat the purpose of keeping the area clear. Lawrence noted there are already bushes around the existing sign. Thiesse asked if the landscaping would be an intensification of the use. Barnhart indicated it would not. Landgraver moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3974, SML Electrical, Inc., on behalf of Bridgewater Bank, 2445 Shadywood Road, with a preference for a back lit sign. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 3 of 3 Date Application Received: August 30, 2017 Date Application Considered as Complete: September 25, 2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: November 24, 2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: October 16, 2017 Council Exhibit E 17-3974 Subject: #174-3974, SML Electric obo BRIDGETWATER BANK, 2445 Shadywood Road, Front yard Setback Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to permit a freestanding pole type sign to be located within the 10 foot side yard setback. The sign would be located less than 2 feet from the property line. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance. Background Bridgewater Bank purchased and renovated the bank property in 2015. At that time, a minor modification to the existing sign structure was completed. The Bank now desires to replace the existing sign structure in the same location, with minor increases in size. Bridgewater proposes a 28 sq ft (7 by 4 feet) sign face within a 14'6' high structure. The pole supporting the sign face will be shrouded in stone for the first 3 feet, then within a wood looking exterior that tapers from the base to the bottom of the sign structure. The stone and the wood looking material will match the existing building. The sign will replace a 60.2 sq ft sign face within a 17'8" tall structure. The pole shroud is covered with a steel type material. There is no steel within the main building. The width (thickness) of the existing structure is 12 inches. The proposed thickness will increase to 22 inches (sign and support) and 29 inches (base). The existing sign is indicated by dashed lines on the second page of Exhibit B. The proposed sign will be in the same location as the existing sign, within the 10 foot front yard setback. The City approved a variance in 2016 for the construction of new pole type sign for the Lunds- Byerlys at 3333 Shoreline Drive at the setback line. (16-3879) Applicable Regulations: Signs in the B-4 Zoning District (78-1466) (11) Monument signs. One monument sign, limited to two faces is allowed per frontage per property, with a maximum of two. The areas of sign base, the supporting background structure, and the sign copy shall be combined for determining the total square footage and the height of the monument sign. FILE # 17-3974 October 16, 2017 Page 2 of 4 a. The total allowable square footage shall not exceed 100 square feet per side. The base and supporting material shall constitute at least 25 percent of the total square footage. b. The base width dimension is 50 percent or more of the greatest width of the sign. c. The sign copy area shall have a minimum clearance of 20 inches above ground level. d. The sign copy area shall be completely enclosed within the monument materials. e. No portion of the sign or sign structure shall exceed ten feet above ground level. f. The monument sign base shall be constructed of materials similar in appearance to those of the principal structure and shall consist of brick, natural stone, stucco, textured cast stone, or integrally colored concrete masonry units. The structure surrounding the face of the sign from the base to the top of the sign must be solid, continuous, and consist of the base materials or complementary materials that match the appearance and color of the principal building. g. The 200 square feet of ground area around the base of the monument sign shall be landscaped with shrubs or perennials. 78-1468 Signs in 8 and I districts 8-1, B-2 and 8-4: height. Within the B-1, B-2 and B-4 districts, no sign shall extend in height more than two feet above the highest outside wall or parapet of any principal building, nor shall any sign be located closer than ten feet from any property line; except that any sign over ten square feet may project two feet into any required yard area from the principal building. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicable regulation provides for commercial signage in a manner that does not impact the traveling public due to hindered visibility and visual clutter. Further, the ordinance FILE # 17-3974 October 16, 2017 Page 3 of 4 intends on improving the streetscape by requiring more stable, architecturally significant monument signs in lieu of pylon signs. The variances, if granted, would protect visibility while providing signage similar to monument signs. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject parcel as commercial, the proposed signage supports and is consistent with the intended use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The use of the property is a financial institution. Freestanding signage is a normal and expected accessory structure in commercial settings. The proposed signage, to be located in a conforming location, would require the removal of several parking spaces, possible increasing hard cover. Further, the sign as proposed replaced one in this same location for several decades. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The lot was developed in the 1970s, and has been a bank for many decades. The siting of the building and the parking lot was established by previous developers; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Recognizing that signage is a normal improvement in a commercial setting, the proposed signage is intended to compliment the improvements being made on the principal structure while maintaining site visibility at the intersections. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The pattern of development in this area has resulted in buildings and parking areas very close to the traveled portion of the road, this is unique to this neighborhood. 5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The development of the property pre ordinance, the impact of expansions of County Roads 15 and 19 over the years are unique to the subject parcel. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variances allow for the placement of a sign at a logical location given the constraints of the property due to development patterns, access, and adjacent streets. Signage for commercial property is a right given to all commercial businesses. 7. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. There has been no evidence to suggest that the variances would impact the health, safety, and comfort of adjacent parcels or the city at large. The applicant has proposed a sign slightly wider and thicker than the existing sign, visibility will not be impacted. 8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Placement of a sign in a conforming location and a conforming style would require complete overhaul/ expansion of the parking lot, which would introduce other issues with the parking lot, including hardcover, stormwater control, access, and lot size. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. FILE # 17-3974 October 16, 2017 Page 4 of 4 Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status Not applicable Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds the proposed sign is marginally bigger than the existing non -conforming sign. Basically, the thickness of the sign and the width of the base prevent the structure from being replaced 'in- kind'. The practical difficulties form provided by the applicant focuses on the proposed structure and its impact on the character of the area, and the reasonableness of the request. The Commission should discuss whether the applicant has satisfied the practical difficulties necessary to support a variance. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit C. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 14 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3975, Kelly Hanson, 1284 Wildhurst Trail, CUP — Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Consent Agenda City Planner Section: Purpose. This application is regarding a conditional use permit (CUP) for a permanent dock installation. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on September 19, 2017. The 60 -Day review period has been extended and now expires on January 17, 2017. Background. The applicant is currently building a new home on the vacant property. In addition, they wish to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) regulates docks on the Lake. A LMCD permit was issued on November 15t; the installation will be done over the winter. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On October 16th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 6 to 0 in favor of a motion to approve with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and b. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. 5. Public Comment. No comments have been received on this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the CUP to allow the permanent dock to be installed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans & Survey Exhibit C. LMCD Permit Exhibit D. Photos — by Applicant Exhibit E. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit F. PC Staff Report Prepared By: MOO References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Application Survey Dock Plans Property Owners List Plat Map Approved By: 5bV Council Exhibit A 17-3975 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1118 FILE NO. 17-3975 WHEREAS, Kelly Marie Kahlert is the trustee of the Kelly Marie Hanson Revocable Trust (hereinafter "the Applicant") the owner of the property located at 1284 Wildhurst Trail within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City"), Hennepin County PID 07-117-23-31-0026, and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Wildhurst Trail, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1118(3) for construction of a permanent dock extending into the floodplain; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 17-3975. 2. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on October 16, 2017 and recommended approval of the CUP based on the following findings: a. The Property is located within the LR -1 B One Family Lakeshore Residential District. b. The dock is a water use feature and its extension into the floodplain is reasonable c. The dock will be built of sturdy materials designed for the specific use, minimizing upkeep and annual maintenance. 3. Conditional Use Permit Analysis. The City Council makes the following findings with regard to the criteria necessary for the granting of a conditional use permit. Page 1 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. a. Consistent with the community management plan; The Property is zoned and used for residential use. Docks are anticipated accessory uses on lakeshore residential properties. This criterion is met. b. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Docks are listed as allowed accessory uses in residential zoning districts. This criterion is met. c. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The dock does not require inordinate additional public services. d. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The dock will not increase demands on the water or waste water treatment systems. e. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The dock improvement is not expected to generate additional demand. f. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. g. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. g. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. h. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The dock will be used for residential, non-commercial uses consistent with the surrounding properties. This criterion is met. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; Docks are a common improvement in floodplains, no buffering or screening is recommended. This criterion is met. Page 2 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; This criterion is met. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This residential dock on a single family property is not expected to generate excessive traffic or be an inconvenience to adjoining properties. This criterion is met. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The dock is constructed of wood, and will be consistent in appearance with other docks in the area. This criterion is met. m. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant will be informed of this requirement. All lighting shall conform and be directed downward and away from neighboring residences, and Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. No evidence has been suggested that the dock will be hazardous. This criterion is met. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the Applicant's request would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1118 for construction of a permanent dock extending into the floodplain, subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval is for dock depicted on the survey and plans attached as Exhibits A & B. Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 13th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 4 of 4 J V OD 0 D CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TOM KAHLERT 8c KELLY HANSON EXISTING HOK OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WILDHURST TRAIL / USE DEC '1270 60 / HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 ............. / ���� / / �• �_ 155 ° —'S/r eLACKtoP /.. / 44 IE / -_-Z / i 1/12 / 391,00 OLDEBUILDING / / / / / / / / / / / IN THIS AREA / / / / / / / / / / / / / ....../• . 123.84.0 :N / co 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) N / 20PROPOSE 9 i410 coo SCAo p/,SOV .r DOCKS / I I �°' /i/ / / d '� I / / / / 4.o 35 O O. I O / / / / / / / / / 9°` / i o�/ ,hyo °' o/ o o / I � 1, l / / / l / / / / / � / / /� -• apo•.•, <11 1284 WILDHURS /f RAIL // / / / 8.0 / 1 0/ / / / I / / / / / / /O / �/ Oo. AVERAGE BU14DING / 5� / /� / S� BACK LJNE / SETBA , FO R T LAKE OWER / / I I / / // / LINE POLE i (LAKE// MINNETONKA) / / So 0.22 /OILDINC IFROM SVTDACK\ (935.0) SLRVEY LI LINA -— 94.83 139.10L /�./ .,........... 85.Oq / �BLAC TOP 967.4) '; 1 0.0� \ / (636.3)/ 483.94 / ROAD Y I \ I 124q.83 + \ � (964.3 I o��Oi � , � � (966. — )I •..... i S 8602 17 // W // 34.1) (IRON TO 929.4) �................... .061.0 POWER / \ I I I / MWH9 .4 \ RET. ( ) co (964.4) •_ / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ...... II / Lot 1, Block 1, WILDHURST TRAIL // I EXISTING / 1 / • denotes iron marker found HOUSE #1298 / (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum \ / — —917 — — : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum and DECK per County maps Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, topography per County maps, and adjacent houses, and the proposed location of a proposed dock thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. -- I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report SCALE 8-1-17 PROPOSED DOCKS SHOWN GRONBERG 8c ASSOCIATES, INC • was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1 "=30' and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 5-3-17 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 JOB NO. 952-473-4141 17-180A Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 17-180A DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED COCKs-LIIFT Tim & Mike Latterner SPP 19 2017 COCKVK�ETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or .9521474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/4712608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO e-mail. info@dockandlift.com Customer Name Customer Address 24-W19AIJ Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail kA ier4_tom to 6 ftkl 1.1,leliM ------------- Ito ------------------------- -------- -s__----_---i----.+_.-.._ -- ----- -------- , t i S i I s 1 t 3 • t , e iX 'ton tL . t N♦ t i i t _ S i r , [ i 'f' � P4 w t , ' 2Z %I •moi (x f I \ r f .__.. ... �..,... ._.q__..«i.._-------_----,......................... f r f 1 t 0 5 F e t t t c f E [ SI i ! i .�_ t i " .._ ...*.. .Sg.L ...------`... .- ... .. _..-i- ---- - - Y...L �::�... - •-- --_'k... .. - - -•- .... .. ..- t N t 1 9� I I 1 .1 1 ;e 7_5� ------- ------ -------- --------- Tr .. ... DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED DOCK SKETCH DOCK&LIFT Tim &Mike Latternelr SEP 19 2017Phone: 952/471-8343or952/474-7934 I ... Y ,x-xv,,.F 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO e-mail. info@dockandliff.com Comer Name Customer Address Lk) d § � I Customer Ph a Customer City, State & Zip date (,e.1 `L �0 i n (� P n1. [n I�il>\ f lra -I DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED DOCK SKETCH DOCK&LIFT Tim & Mike Lattterner SEP 1 9 ZU'flhone: 952/471-8343 or 9521474-7934 5,5.-i Aa:. sc.Is'.L 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO a -mail: info@dockandlift.com Cus Omer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail : °dt � i • i a [ i s 1 k a a `........---- .......... .«----------------- .._....-......... r.._x..u............ «----------- -7 5 •-_ J V OD 0 D CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TOM KAHLERT 8c KELLY HANSON EXISTING HOK OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WILDHURST TRAIL / USE DEC '1270 60 / HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 ............. / ���� / / �• �_ 155 ° —'S/r eLACKtoP /.. / 44 IE / -_-Z / i 1/12 / 391,00 OLDEBUILDING / / / / / / / / / / / IN THIS AREA / / / / / / / / / / / / / ....../• . 123.84.0 :N / co 929.4 CONTOUR LINE (O.H.W.) N / 20PROPOSE 9 i410 coo SCAo p/,SOV .r DOCKS / I I �°' /i/ / / d '� I / / / / 4.o 35 O O. I O / / / / / / / / / 9°` / i o�/ ,hyo °' o/ o o / I � 1, l / / / l / / / / / � / / /� -• apo•.•, <11 1284 WILDHURS /f RAIL // / / / 8.0 / 1 0/ / / / I / / / / / / /O / �/ Oo. AVERAGE BU14DING / 5� / /� / S� BACK LJNE / SETBA , FO R T LAKE OWER / / I I / / // / LINE POLE i (LAKE// MINNETONKA) / / So 0.22 /OILDINC IFROM SVTDACK\ (935.0) SLRVEY LI LINA -— 94.83 139.10L /�./ .,........... 85.Oq / �BLAC TOP 967.4) '; 1 0.0� \ / (636.3)/ 483.94 / ROAD Y I \ I 124q.83 + \ � (964.3 I o��Oi � , � � (966. — )I •..... i S 8602 17 // W // 34.1) (IRON TO 929.4) �................... .061.0 POWER / \ I I I / MWH9 .4 \ RET. ( ) co (964.4) •_ / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ...... II / Lot 1, Block 1, WILDHURST TRAIL // I EXISTING / 1 / • denotes iron marker found HOUSE #1298 / (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum \ / — —917 — — : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum and DECK per County maps Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, topography per County maps, and adjacent houses, and the proposed location of a proposed dock thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. -- I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report SCALE 8-1-17 PROPOSED DOCKS SHOWN GRONBERG 8c ASSOCIATES, INC • was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1 "=30' and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 5-3-17 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 JOB NO. 952-473-4141 17-180A Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 17-180A DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED COCKs-LIIFT Tim & Mike Latterner SPP 19 2017 COCKVK�ETCH Phone: 952/471-8343 or .9521474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/4712608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO e-mail. info@dockandlift.com Customer Name Customer Address 24-W19AIJ Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail kA ier4_tom to 6 ftkl 1.1,leliM ------------- Ito ------------------------- -------- -s__----_---i----.+_.-.._ -- ----- -------- , t i S i I s 1 t 3 • t , e iX 'ton tL . t N♦ t i i t _ S i r , [ i 'f' � P4 w t , ' 2Z %I •moi (x f I \ r f .__.. ... �..,... ._.q__..«i.._-------_----,......................... f r f 1 t 0 5 F e t t t c f E [ SI i ! i .�_ t i " .._ ...*.. .Sg.L ...------`... .- ... .. _..-i- ---- - - Y...L �::�... - •-- --_'k... .. - - -•- .... .. ..- t N t 1 9� I I 1 .1 1 ;e 7_5� ------- ------ -------- --------- Tr .. ... DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED DOCK SKETCH DOCK&LIFT Tim &Mike Latternelr SEP 19 2017Phone: 952/471-8343or952/474-7934 I ... Y ,x-xv,,.F 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO e-mail. info@dockandliff.com Comer Name Customer Address Lk) d § � I Customer Ph a Customer City, State & Zip date (,e.1 `L �0 i n (� P n1. [n I�il>\ f lra -I DOCK & LIFT, INC. RECEIVED DOCK SKETCH DOCK&LIFT Tim & Mike Lattterner SEP 1 9 ZU'flhone: 952/471-8343 or 9521474-7934 5,5.-i Aa:. sc.Is'.L 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.com CITY OF ORONO a -mail: info@dockandlift.com Cus Omer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City, State & Zip Date Customer E -Mail : °dt � i • i a [ i s 1 k a a `........---- .......... .«----------------- .._....-......... r.._x..u............ «----------- -7 5 •-_ JN4,c�-,, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD, SUITE 200 • MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 • TELEPHONE 952745-0789 • FAX 9521745-9085 November 1, 2017 Mr. Tom Kahlert Ms. Kelly Hanson 1284 Wildhurst Trail Orono, MN 55364 email: kahlerttom@gmail.com RE: Permanent Non -Multiple, Non -Commercial Dock Permit for 1284 Wildhurst Trail, Orono, Forest Lake Bay. PID #07-117-23-31-0026 Dear Mr. Kahlert and Ms. Hanson: Thank you for contacting the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD). Your permit for a Permanent Non -Multiple, Non -Commercial Dock for 1284 Wildhurst Trail is enclosed. The attached permit outlines specifications and a summary of conditions that are required as part of the permanent dock approval. Please keep a copy of the permit for your records. Upon completion and submittal of the as -built survey, please contact the LMCD Office to schedule a final inspection. If you have questions, please contact me at 952-745-0789 or at vs chleuningklmcd. org. Sincerely, Vickie Schleuning Executive Director Enc. Permanent Dock Permit #17-111-18 cc: Tim Latterner, Dock and Lift, wendie@dockandlift.com www.Imcd.org Imcd@Imcd.org To preserve and enhance the "Lake Minnetonka experience" otNNerO:N v Property Owner: Property Address PID: Date of Permit: Code Section: Shoreline: Approved BSUs: Municipality: Bay: APPROVED LMCD PERMANENT DOCK PERMIT #17-111-18 NON-COMMERCIAL, NON -MULTIPLE DOCK Tom Kahlert and Kelly Hanson 1284 Wildhurst Trail Orono, MN 55364 07-117-23-31-0026 11/01/2017 2.06, Permanent Non -Multiple, Non -Commercial Docks 106 feet Up to Four (Subject to 2.02, Subd. 3) Orono Forest Lake I. Permit Overview A permanent, non -multiple dock structure is approved as follows: A straight dock with an overall footprint of 36 feet wide and no more than 100 feet in length as it extends into the lake from the OHW mark (929.4ft). Length is in compliance with LMCD Code Section 2.01. Two boat storage units; however additional watercraft may be allowed as prescribed by LMCD Code. Approximately 31 pilings; piling spacing varies from 4 to 8 feet. Some modifications may be necessary at the time of installation. The dock decking/structure does not exceed 8 feet in both length and width at any location. A planned 21 -foot setback from the northern extended side site line (due to canopy), and approximately 43 -foot setback from the southern extended side site line. These setbacks are in compliance with the setbacks required by LMCD Code Section 2.01. Setbacks apply to watercraft and structures alike. II. Site -Specific Permit Conditions The approved permit is subject to the following: The construction of the dock is subject to the approved Site Plan (Dated 05/03/2017, Received Date 09/14/2017). III. Standard Permit Conditions An as -built survey must be submitted upon completion of the dock installation. LMCD must be notified at the completion of the installation in order to conduct a final inspection. No changes may occur to the permanent dock for size, location, or configuration without seeking a new permanent dock permit. However, a new permit is not required for repair or replacement of the permanent dock if you do not alter the size, type, www.Imcd.org Imcd@Imcd.org To preserve and enhance the "Lake Minnetonka experience" location, or configuration. Any structures placed as part of this permit shall be maintained in good condition and shall promptly be removed, together with any watercraft stored on them, if this permit is ever revoked or rendered null and void. This property is not eligible for a de-icing license as defined by LMCD Code Section 2.09. More information about de-icing operations is available in the LMCD Code Section 2.09. Adjustments to the dock may be required if environmental concerns arise, navigational safety or unreasonable limitation to lake access occurs for adjacent properties due to the dock installation or use. Approval from the LMCD does not absolve you of the need to secure all necessary permits or approval from all governmental agencies. Any changes to the property such as subdivision or combination may render the permit null and void and requires a review by the LMCD Executive Director within forty-five (45) days of the change to the property. Use of the Lake shall at all times remain subject to regulation by the LMCD to assure the public of reasonable and equitable access to the Lake. The issuance of this permit shall grant no vested rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka. IV. Purpose/Impact To provide a secure docking area for the resident's watercraft. V. MN DNR General Permit #97-6098 The MN DNR General Permit issued to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) requires specific standards be met prior to issuing dock licenses. One standard is to obtain review and comments of the proposed application from the MN DNR Fisheries Manager and Hydrologist. This application was provided for review and comments to the MN DNR and representatives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City of Orono. No comments or objections were received. VI. Permit Approval Pursuant to LMCD Code Section 2.06, Permanent Non -Multiple Non -Commercial Docks, this permanent dock permit is granted based on compliance with the approved site plan and other applicable requirements. Violations of the provisions of the District's Code of Ordinances are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days and/or imposition of a fine of not more than $1,000.00. Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT this 1St day of November, 2017. Attest: I _,Zawt� Vickie Schleuning, Execu ector 1284 Wildhurst Trail Permanent Dock Permit Page 2 of 2 F n V< :.BmwIt do V6 4 ,_ - � r - _ ` � f - �-•,�9R �.. -. - r tom+ - . ! T• r „ _ s • !• ` ,. '� '"i. a 1 —_ , • f Ste` A - � �F f � _ 7� ._4. - :ate' � - ~ - _ § i t s - , - 4 Y r At — - # - -� "sir.. ,IN � -t �� +,, • �� � - _ Nw , _e IL 1p 04 gp 11 4d, ro lop Wzg AF .i d ' 3 r ti B { — 7' , • r " y—; sib.. i a = n ,, # y ti Ta' y B BE - R Tip,_ , *�e •4 . e rte' � � - t Ale � 4r AW- ,, r - °" ♦ ' p., y' n. i-^ s. r' r ' a , F : - _ e e •- •-_ `� r, "baa cM `Ir AFL` '� ��40 ' " - � a a � � I� _- F•,. �411 - ,�;site _4S I—A �B E�lot �"'' S r y Y , rM,.. _ •- ,F Ill - w _ .-,y . _ 114t, - -91, � .b � .� f .� � . - '. } ,� f l :y • c may. • , � ,_ ' J f ,'a2,`5 ,� ¢'� - - •�' ,�_ ,.a, _ ' �' X -{ � Si _ r i 1 F , _ »h: ``ter „� • '- �,�� . �, _ 6 _ _ _ - N� _ .> _ ,,,,,r� - _ _ -. �y�F ' Y . r / ` - � � .,/� 1 ,� • a I! a .0 � . _ r _ _y - " . � 9 „� - - _ . - �, ` 'r•' e . ei- _:. .;Jr � 71r:- •fir .�. `�. .�_,, �, o �. r a .�1 .. .., _ �, N +. i R.! .. r .t+. � � g " 'i x � y , y o AL 7 - ,h " _.B = ° ,�. y'� �v_.a - _:*.� " - +�' a �� • ! , rt -r i : 1 r '7' - B .. _ : +�� _. _ ! . �� .,B `df'' _ �� ' .,,� g. 6 : _ , a y • � � "'sl - ,:.A. -.r_ '�. L y .f, _ . f w -t.ti _ �i- .: .. +� �j _ �- -�,. 's,... ._ _ � � - ''•yam` '1�- + ��` 'fir •� 6'��'� RP K OEM ft f _ >o n V< :.BmwIt do V6 4 ,_ - � r - _ ` � f - �-•,�9R �.. -. - r tom+ - . ! T• r „ _ s • !• ` ,. '� '"i. a 1 —_ , • f Ste` A - � �F f � _ 7� ._4. - :ate' � - ~ - _ § i t s - , - 4 Y r At — - # - -� "sir.. ,IN � -t �� +,, • �� � - _ Nw , _e IL 1p 04 gp 11 4d, ro lop Wzg AF .i d ' 3 r ti B { — 7' , • r " y—; sib.. i a = n ,, # y ti Ta' y B BE - R Tip,_ , *�e •4 . e rte' � � - t Ale � 4r AW- ,, r - °" ♦ ' p., y' n. i-^ s. r' r ' a , F : - _ e e •- •-_ `� r, "baa cM `Ir AFL` '� ��40 ' " - � a a � � I� _- F•,. �411 - ,�;site _4S I—A �B E�lot �"'' S r y Y , rM,.. _ •- ,F Ill - w _ .-,y . _ 114t, - -91, � .b � .� f .� � . - '. } ,� f l :y • c may. • , � ,_ ' J f ,'a2,`5 ,� ¢'� - - •�' ,�_ ,.a, _ ' �' X -{ � Si _ r i 1 F , _ »h: ``ter „� • '- �,�� . �, _ 6 _ _ _ - N� _ .> _ ,,,,,r� - _ _ -. �y�F ' Y . r / ` - � � .,/� 1 ,� • a I! a .0 � . _ r _ _y - " . � 9 „� - - _ . - �, ` 'r•' e . ei- _:. .;Jr � 71r:- •fir .�. `�. .�_,, �, o �. r a .�1 .. .., _ �, N +. i R.! .. r .t+. � � g " 'i x � y , y o AL 7 - ,h " _.B = ° ,�. y'� �v_.a - _:*.� " - +�' a �� • ! , rt -r i : 1 r '7' - B .. _ : +�� _. _ ! . �� .,B `df'' _ �� ' .,,� g. 6 : _ , a y • � � "'sl - ,:.A. -.r_ '�. L y .f, _ . f w -t.ti _ �i- .: .. +� �j _ �- -�,. 's,... ._ _ � � - ''•yam` '1�- + ��` 'fir •� 6'��'� RP K OEM ft 1 , win . 0 1p ram i- r: t� T 1 _ s , win . 0 1p ram i- r: t� T 1 _ s 0, AAA pi C� %ci'I LU -r AN r.C%• `3."'8�i�`.\ �. it ' �` - -_ -" - - - - i -„--r -_ .a�.�-..��. _ �P h .91 Kai r .ryi d.tn. -. y` a tl♦ �'. M a." tl4 :• j^ n, \ t A� - - . - l � n w _ • .rvy� - .a � a, _ :, a... � ,. ,:' i`. ' ♦ Y -.- ~�''�'!m-+ate*,_ 'a + Y _ rn t• � --- •� .�! ♦.K: �a_ _ `�^ -- •'� T• .\ tee. '♦� �- r ,\�`y i .�.yw ♦ 1 Vf R V' -m yrs - '.`., < �+�' i•5 �.— .'tea. _� nw� r'.-: _-„i -- - _ _ .- .. ss SLS. . 1 #g, T - e., < ,....,P ,., .:.,-�. �._... i,. .: -'C. —T S i.;r�„, sLL> -�� i'i £'•�� _ - ..- - _ - - may, — - � _ -- - - a _ F 1' ,•+.� cwt-. k It I _ � 3 a. a IS �t y..I � L � 'T.f ,tic9 .9a FF" I 4M. .; a ,f .. , _ ' 7, Fur .�� pia +1� it 9J, '7v aF` x't $ry it i9 � i a o yh lye •Il+j Si 'r. pl! _ISI I - `��'�\� � �I • �� Y: i L y N't I1 i'SY w•�i�' 7 s got I V ' II• ��� ._ fit Rm ;. _ -=ie IIF ."+ „h IF- IF 66 G a �y� _ IF &g. Y Mm IF lip .. t JYI. a' i...r -Xr :./ 11 D M. IF {T a z _ if gi r If T nAppot IF III fF I got IF R j'- a - Jawzf IF IF a -c. `' r.I. go II: k•.. a� aX �� ''"+r. ' t rd 11 f 7 Jae ` >- i .10 � F �. - J lot , kP Y,If ^vw_ 1 YIF- Y` s got ''"+r. ' t rd 11 f 7 Jae ` >- i .10 � F �. - J lot , kP Y,If ^vw_ 1 YIF- Y` For to ''"+r. ' t rd 11 f 7 Jae ` >- i .10 � F �. - J lot , kP Y,If ^vw_ 1 YIF- Y` I� It fya o _,�J. roar' J . OAJ 0 19 ��' it ty, ♦ fa k rsR 'A• Ra liY' !-' . r '`�► ' lhh� °iR•' ' a ,k yY• .!W VIP %' a MAIL, Ip Ay��{q ��l�jj1 Iy i�1.+� �w R*i ✓nPY?"r`. • AW ,,d/rf�..�, �. f?�� �. . ` a"� 4% � `\ kyr?� .` i11 q�T/� ,s� ��• r .�, %rt � `� 7 $. . �ZA�14' s1 r$'. r ,, } 1 3 � t ';y Yt Jti'�Q E•\e p.':M1 l. �j�s1 �, \„ , R•,moi{It51 �.j t N: L:,�'., a _y` •.x. ••, e� ',, rA.:a �.. '/,i ,,n ,� �� .,iSt�, y�1 i.. r':,'i'i( YY11N.,' Ir �Y t ph I9. Vii. \ ��`. lj y 7• :,t f r �D IVa_ a� y�i,��� l l by •. t M af'f W,>t' i pysi, S. 19 rpt I. -- tlrA .9Q r.l tom'., Ivy r r r rt ��� i r. .ems, •.. . ,_. _— ,. itt 4 _ • _ - A y Yr -r a . ._ �. �• 4 rid ►'� y Yn Id .. t�. ti. �Y�`-9 r4r \rr tf �,r,r�r ... ii �7r >, R4k I fv r fi �a Q• �I 1" =_I r S • 1 sm.. IV d r"_ - f y r r, ",1 iw . PIJ _ •l � "E�-. ��u�+• � .az � "r%. r r J, ` JON, •;Is Of +1 it, +� WV% f s1 �, �"i per• IF Iig' III •� ' .` „41 z' Y�yS'yt ��,-. G'-'y.AF S {1 !r �L�1 .. (,. • t � i .. A e Ny! - d'o It Ir— I '401. _ 'e'er stv4 31 wd %_hy F' J r-, a s r - - a; Y •� ; w 4 ` -q, _..".,,,.r�' I Cit4 n - f. Is — %tf�ys,/µ'L's _/ 7,•�' if - _-s# ��'N. ;. {.., n ` ,a,,, S 'pt t,. �. - Is p�Qa�,,x • t e "'� Y 4 i IL NL- Is If - _ •--....y A! 3 4 +R�. t \ `..r LST �` ; ; a' e, • IV -, All K. ,sA 1. , i ,� V -� • ♦\!� F Y S r�� t t.•: bv]P a - __. -+sem, . • _ " - .-,• ,/+mac `Mwe `ff. ` s. 4 __ ;�,. _ _"- �._ _- -� : -- _ _ _ .f � .--"�3� ��.i•t �;^�•��.-� :Ns.}t .tom _ y --S? -� .- - - - - _.�� -_.. _.. i , .r' •t _ i - 49 - ' -• _ _ b s .r. -i r� ,ya 3 ,nr,...._r''a,.T.-%^-.-_"•` m"•T. „-_. h:.`� �".3 ..•t. ar,,,.'• -. _ _ }Ip,,..� w+k-� '- _ .. _ - _ °,' �. -_^"` 1 i-..,.�..�«- - �.-'3'�a` �ay,-a„� .�-7a' -.: i ; „� : '-+.. 4 � wrs Q . a, ,t `��; _ •�y.,,�. � -i'i � ;ue: Rs �-�,`. _ __ .. .++«x� � _. ... t�hy ,'�e.�_ PM_� � 5... _<:. .r-' a, �`XI*,'►. �v�`�_t�,a <i.!�va,�_� _ 9 �- - ":y.F -•�. .i�,rs ,a-'L"Sa -ti. �"-T^" -��__. .bi- -.� __ �' __ _ . .ir�.,t, ".: o-.. � ..� : a•. ,„.:...�. ',• .�`i--•'y�ra+, - � �$'�' _r-�. _ ',`�+��.,a-;d� =a� h•. Fs..�'-�- Yti_.,,,�a- ��-- -, _ - ..� .. _ _ 4 F pn. tea_. ,� • ^, a .- y ,`;, ° -n—yds.- s• -;i ' _ ail __ ;�,. _ _"- �._ _- -� : -- _ _ _ .f � .--"�3� ��.i•t �;^�•��.-� :Ns.}t .tom _ y --S? -� .- - - - - _.�� -_.. _.. i , .r' •t _ i - 49 - ' -• _ _ b s .r. -i r� ,ya 3 ,nr,...._r''a,.T.-%^-.-_"•` m"•T. „-_. h:.`� �".3 ..•t. ar,,,.'• -. _ _ }Ip,,..� w+k-� '- _ .. _ - _ °,' �. -_^"` 1 i-..,.�..�«- - �.-'3'�a` �ay,-a„� .�-7a' -.: i ; „� : '-+.. 4 � wrs Q . a, ,t `��; _ •�y.,,�. � -i'i � ;ue: Rs �-�,`. _ __ .. .++«x� � _. ... t�hy ,'�e.�_ PM_� � 5... _<:. .r-' a, �`XI*,'►. �v�`�_t�,a <i.!�va,�_� _ 9 �- - ":y.F -•�. .i�,rs ,a-'L"Sa -ti. �"-T^" -��__. .bi- -.� __ �' __ _ . .ir�.,t, ".: o-.. � ..� : a•. ,„.:...�. ',• .�`i--•'y�ra+, - � �$'�' _r-�. _ ',`�+��.,a-;d� =a� h•. Fs..�'-�- Yti_.,,,�a- ��-- -, _ - ..� .. _ _ 4 F pn. tea_. ,� • ^, a .- y ,`;, ° -n—yds.- s• -;i ' _ wR41j n.4 � rr ell •� _ � r ♦ v vw m 10At- "+avow i'. I� 1t- � �I O t _ +;gm r_ pe LL LLL rr LL _S e yy 1 '�• r r., „� - '+ _ , ,... :tis .. _. __->-' ac "--,a`,9a` } - ... _ �. - - ',- _ - _ , T •- _ n c_ P � l �>F w V N L �� ` t y - Wry a VA s - , - G'• a C 1 • ` w �' '�T` �qd'e VkIII IZ- OL R �a [� I y ' 4 -' , J • a. 1 TIIk - IZII APF VO t NI IjP ,Vw ( s n ' _ It i. -,jam `>- -.r'e*• • �` - - "a. `�\ ,,. t 1. •fjL IV JO' Owl t tIV �FT IN 4t 4 t c F ' x '� y► 11...., ' `1'1�s yu `� x ^,51; , ,�,+r' • r5 .. *5.r tY13 x • {'^ i,v ty`+[ �I.. { I . f; ' ,j?''', err a s147i 6•'� r - `t[,'F s♦ `11' �A�`kk i ka7Y..7 '�►.- a, n�' `"�' a I.., l l�u �^.��A• ��'.ts91'rolI,�i^t'Ja��9�a�� .� , I n j"���\ iii "1��r , .. x\\ �4 ,y F R��4a `,r•,� ,'2)\Us i zc 'J. �.�a,? ,' I'a�. a"I ,F'°I"I,Y,r•, C./r 'IIt,`',�\y\'�♦p; It � .' w �� i'rq w V ":. �,`` ice`, •' n '' `I t, •��. J 1� ! �.:'��•�'y�'ygye�,� ♦D`yQ;`..li c'V� !1Y'tQ. va+It.'j` a' ;�I. '°3.6'Yj.C^� a j >j'r °:'�.E! - _ Jt %♦ yr ,X — ""�� ARI ::��� ._, M1 ^.�*to' I t`�}��yy y I. `. T� ` �M I v -`�� y�x i , `}s y.r•! a' �ey*'i ♦ y '� .�•�•� .+ti�IIIQ_. '! 1v 4`si\ ' v'}F v i'A� � S �d ��'�. �A4 ♦t I)I i tp,j A NA yaIr 5'�y+. y ) r,, Irr t�j.A 4.. 1 -.�J ,�), ja X' f' ` j �` AM M.ill �—i -1Itt I 't �/ s : Y W4 � `� e y 5�'`'. r) .�JA 4.6 'SIR►@ , irk IN i i 6 � _— 'I. IIIk f� - q• , ti - - ov NI 1 >"#' Fs .- c-3"rs.- •Oy: {,. a .4. J7 �Wit_ _ RT-`q.,:'it �_. - PI x 'i- to r< l Ttq"i r_ t.:.. .. .. r,. , .. �. F ^'.:._ t..,. ,, _a_5 +y y waa e•q !.;•, , . R•• _ -> Y A�.�� Ali � - r 10 IN It AN 1 ' < .:. :. -. FXV `y, •cc�*i. _ • '41k N tea, t � v 'S.' (p ��• �. + ; _ 4 Ir � F Nk MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 8. 17-3975 KELLY HANSON, 1284 WILDHURST TRAIL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:42 P.M. — 8:45 P.M. Kelly and Tom Kahlert, Applicants, were present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for a permanent dock installation. The applicant is currently building a new home on the vacant property and would also like to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock within the floodway, a conditional use permit is required. The LMCD regulates docks on Lake Minnetonka and has not yet processed the application fully. However, it appears the proposed dock will meet all of their setbacks. The conditional use permit analysis was provided in Staff's report. There are no specific building code construction standards for docks. The City does require that a zoning permit be issued for the dock to document the existence and construction of a permanent dock on the lake. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. Kelly and Tom Kahlert stated they can answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen moved, Schwingler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3975, Kelly Kahlert, 1284 Wildhurst Trail, granting of a conditional use permit subject to conditions of Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 09/19/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 09/19/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 11/18/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 16 October 2017 Subject: #17-3975, Kelly Hanson, 1284 Wildhurst Trail, Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is currently building a new home on the vacant property. In addition, they wish to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) regulates docks on the Lake. Applicable Regulations: CUP (Section 78-1117) Floodway means the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. Permanent docks may be allowed as a conditional use within the floodway following the standards and procedures set forth in City Code Section 78-1148 and further subject to the standards set forth in Code Section 78-1119. The LMCD has not yet processed the application fully; however, the proposed dock will extend approximately 100 feet from the shore, and appears that it will meet all LMCD-required setbacks. Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-916 & 78-1119) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; Docks are anticipated accessory uses on lakeshore residential properties. This criterion is met. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Docks are listed as allowed accessory uses in residential zoning districts. This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. This criterion is met. FILE # 17-3975 16 Oct 2017 Page 2 of 4 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Not applicable. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The permanent dock is not expected to generate an excessive demand for public services. This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area, there is no proposed change of use. This criterion is met. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed permanent dock is not expected to impair property values or impact permitted uses in the area. This criterion is met. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD. This criterion is met. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; This criterion is met. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This residential dock on a single family property is not expected to generate excessive traffic or be an inconvenience to adjoining properties. This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD. This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant will be informed of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This criterion is met. Additional standards for floodway conditional uses (Sec. 78-1119). A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the one percent chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Accessory structures. Accessory structures, as identified in section 78-1118(1), may be permitted, provided that: (1) Structures are not intended for human habitation; (2) Structures will have a low flood damage potential; FILE # 17-3975 16 Oct 2017 Page 3 of 4 (3) Structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (4) Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (5) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the state building code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (6) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the state building code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and b. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (d) Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (e) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the one percent chance or regional flood. The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. (f) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Orono's concurrent jurisdiction over permanent docks is primarily via the City's floodplain regulations, which provide no significant standards pertinent to the approval of permanent docks. Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures, so with the exception of the RS District, one cannot have a permanent or seasonal dock without a principal residence structure. This property is zoned LR -1B. There are no specific Building Code construction standards for docks. The City will require that a FILE # 17-3975 16 Oct 2017 Page 4 of 4 zoning permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock. Permanent docks (i.e. those docks with permanent pilings which cannot be removed without heavy equipment) sometimes result in requests by property owners for winter de-icing, to avoid ice damage. The proposed dock will be located in a fairly well protected area, so the potential for ice damage or the need for de-icing is relatively minimal. There appear to be other permanent docks in the area, and the city has received no documented problems or issues. Another potential concern would be whether the work is in a sensitive habitat or spawning area, and whether the permanent dock might affect navigation or winter vehicular traffic on the lake. Neither of these issues are apparent with this application. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Dock Plans Exhibit D. Property Owners List Exhibit E. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 15 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description #17-3978, Alexander Design Group o/b/o Travis Hansberger, 1720 Shadywood Road, Variance — Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Consent Agenda City Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variance request for a rear setback and hardcover to exceed 25%, lot area and lot width. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The 60 -Day review period expires on November 25, 2017. Background. The applicant is proposing to demo the existing home and construct a new single family house. The home was designed the meet the structural coverage of the lot at 20% but is requesting a hardcover variance to allow for adequate driveway space and a patio. The existing lot has 35.74% hardcover and the proposed improvement would have 33.98% hardcover. They are requesting a rear yard setback for the principal structure of 24.8 feet where 30 feet in required; lot area and lot width variances are required. The existing home encroaches into the 75' lake -yard and the average lakeshore setback; the proposed home is designed to meet these city standards which pushed the home further to the rear of the lot. The applicant is proposing to move the driveway access along Shadywood Road, south to line up with Fagerness Point Road. This is a county road and would require approval through Hennepin County. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted unanimously on a motion to approve with the following conditions: a. Hennepin Council approval for relocating the driveway. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval with the above condition. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. City Engineer Memo Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Prepared By: VY1GG Reviewed By: 11 ja Approved By: _bV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-350, 78-1700 FILE NO. 78-3978 Council Exhibit A #17-3978 WHEREAS, on September 20, 2017, Alexander Design Group o/b/o Travis Hansberger ("Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code and on September 25, 2017 the application was deemed complete for the property addressed 1720 Shadywood Rd and legally described as: Lot 13 and that part of Lot 12 lying distance 71.2 feet northerly of from the south the "Property"); southerly of a line running parallel with and line of said Lot 13, Shady -wood, (hereinafter WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow a reduction in the rear setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow development of a property not meeting the required lot width; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow development of a property not meeting the required lot area; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1700 to allow hardcover to exceed 25%; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby [approves/denies] the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3978. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1C Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.29 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 72 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Rear yard setback b. Hardcover to exceed 25% c. Lot area d. Lot width 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." I. The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear yard variance request is reasonable considering the shape and buildable area of the property. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner by replacing the existing residence with a new home which has less hardcover then existing and the new garage will be moved inward on the lot compared to existing placement of the garage; but the size and width of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and shape, and its proximity to the lake c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the surrounding homes 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -IC District. 3 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The shape and size of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of the lake and Shadywood Road create a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The shape and size of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of Shadywood Road and the lakeshore creates a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting of the requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The size and shape of the Property; its position along Shadywood Road and the lakeshore, limits the access and safety for the homeowners; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 and 78-1700 to allow rear yard seback, hardcover to exceed 25%, lot area and lot width, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hennepin County granting permission for moving the driveway along Shadywood Road (County Road 19). 2. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated September 26, 2017 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 4. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (November 13, 2018). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13 day of November, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: <ON Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor EXISTING CONDITIONS \ 1 1 i 934.2 z �� x 933.7 EXISTING HOUSE x 933.1 /� 1 _ -33 x 932,9 / j 934.0 934.2 x 933.6 x 9.2 932.3 \� MAP 60" \9 - o p + 934.0 i \ 934.0 933.5 / \ 933.4 3 932.9--/�$9 28 57 E 180.5 � �q 933.9 rt 933.3 S FND IP I/2 FND IP POL FND IP 1/2 LO _ II 932. 934.2 4 34.6_ -93 933.2 3.22 933.033.1 - o FND IP I/2 SOLID / 4 33.4 95.00 933.2 - 1 33. 933. x 933.7 �10 934.5 934.0 I x 933.1 X 9 4. * 933.6 CP BIR 3 933.4 x 933 4 933,E--� MAP IS 933.4 X 3 g.- °� ems ex-ese�-esN 9934.0 933.7 g 933.4\ - �AN�SG T L3�.91 34.0 �C--x 933.9 933.2 ��_- X933.\ F 43/4 _ 934.1 33 6- 4. S 9 3:3 / IC1 \ 22.1 J� 93 8 - x\933.6 / 934.0 0/ /�/ "19 9304.0 x 933.9 933.3x 1 1 �TNH= ` 1 \3.5 933.3-g- 335 \ x 933.5 933.9 FFE= / I (I�j N, o 934'7 934.9 I I 934.1 936.4 - I'1 933 6 933 4..� 0934.0 % % I 7. 935.0 934.0 _ rG ° 7.8 / BIR IS" 933.4 - FFE=9 o �F.. n N •r I(7 x933.4 v -93� 933.4 1 1 �z / 35.1 EXISTI G�yJSE 33.4 933.3 933.7 x1 E 933.9 7.8 i Q / n J x 933.8 Q 933.6 _ ; 9. 4,d . 9 g /934.3 21.3 934 I j 935.0 \ r 1 Q I /26.31 i iC� ° ❑A 9.34.8 0/ DECK 934.2 EAGERNESS I �' N x 933.2 I 933.2 1 GEE= z 3 933.7 .r I WOE= I P �' N 934.1 Q -� 1 935_0__ -� IG) DINT�• `� - g 933.3x -/ GAI TGE I B% /� o �x 934.0 / - 934.9 935.0 34.2 932 8 I o N o N 935.7 29l / \ CURB 933. STOP / Q 933.81 934.2 x 934.5 I:i 34 4----938ML.2 -- 934_3 934.0 x 933.1 SPR 36" x 933.9 / ® - 933.6 26.��TE1CLese�-935. 4.6 ��_-� 934.7 0 OHU \ x 933.5LO 933.9 ter; �/Fr M x 94.3 01 / * o � -QHi 933.4 - 934.0�I 93 .0 I� 934.0 I �-- OHUr- X x 934.3 163 03934.8 x 933.6 933.0- �3 6 FND IP 12755 - - - 933.9 FND IP 1/� 934.4 934.9 1935.3 352 934.8 1 1 x 934.6 FND IP 2 932.9 933.5 x 934.7 ° it �f S8 �4 E 17 3.6 +/- 9�Q 932.6 oI I I- 93� x 934.8 / \ 1' = 935.8 935.5 7 c77771 \ �� 9 x 93.3 1 933.4 � � x 93413 _33- j EXISTING HOUSE 933.8 33 - 1 �I 1 1 �1 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 0 1 i 934.2 C x 933.7 / /> EXISTING HOUSE 1 � rn33 - x 933.1 x 93 - 2.9 / x 933.6 x 933.2 932.3 f _�y 933.5 \ MAP 011 \9`3`3 x 932.. �-S89°28'57"E 180.5+/ -r 933. 934.0 3 / FND IP POL FND IT 1/2 3 FND IP 1/2 933.2 933.0 1 FND IP 2 SOLID 1 / c I 93� 934.2 4 34.6- -934 --3.22 - = 12 933.4 95.00 I 0 933.2 734.5 --CONC. PAD � I x 933.1 33. 133.4 933. �� 934.Q� �-CELLAR DOORS o�� 934 MAP 18" BIR /" 3 _- - - r�_�- 15.0 933:4-- ` 933.7 x 9 15.0 32.5 0 - - „ - --O I 80. _3411 --- 933,2I _ (0A N� �3 ------ FND IP 3/4 .9343 / 933.3 _ �30 ! 36.5 t •V \ / x 93 .8 cs �o�s x /134.0 x 933.9 933.3 1 (� 9 1 _-15-- NI PROPOSED FULL BASEMENT TNH= a 936.4 133.5 933.3 1 172(?�,SHADYWOOD ROAD 115.0 a 34.5 Z ° SIL T FENCE, - _ n BIR 18" ----------49.5 1 - �� -- s' 933.4 933.4 Xj�9.i 2�X r; ROCKBERMBERM 9�i.9 N ENTRANCE 24 r ' . meq.. o 0 2< i m �1 933.4 9. W 4.590 I Q I J x 933.8 lin �. _ _ l L 06 I EAGERNESS i 93 . 93 q'�� POINT RD. to N o o • . o 9328 �.. ggx 9 .0 cn / 933. B �i W• '' �' ::., . ' 934.5x I x 933.1 \ L .>Tas�� s�i 5.0 934. x 32.0 0 SPR 36" / x 933.9 933.6' V} -Q / . x 933.5 ` 9 835 in u> x 9 4 934.7 0 oHU��� I1 933.4 , - _ 934. �� 93 . r 934.5) 16 Sl T FENC 0;-,,, 1 __ v 34. 3X3934._ x 933.6 933.0- U 6 FND IP 12755 - - T9JJ J 933 9 FND IP I/2/ 934.4 9�.\ / 935.3 35.2 934.8 1 x 93 .6 FND IP I/2 932.9 11 �933.�� x 934.7 // N S8 I I'�4��E 17, 932 ��Q 932.6 1 0 0 / of 9,3 934.8 X / \ z / X 9 77 G �/_ 3 x 931.3 933.4 34E EXISTING HOUSE I t- i 1 1 �1 FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/ORCT Land Surve o under the laws of the State of Minnesota. TVETE 1 EMW 9/18/2017 PROPOSED CONDITIONS Y CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS DRAWN 2 EMW 9/26/2017 UPDATE HARDCOVER, DRIVEWAY SIZE STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 6th y of Septe b , 2017. DBP AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND 1 CHECKED SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES �� C DBP THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES David B. Pemberton, PLS Minnesota License No. 40344 09/05/17 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. pemberton@sathre.com z9.5 �i29.6 r 29.5 II �� III O 129.5 II `� JI DOCK DOCK �9.6 II , -- EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD29) II 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 930.1 FEET (NGVD29) �29.s r 29.6 I129.5 �129.6 III � SII 29.5 II �� III 1129.5 II `� II DOCK DOCK ��9.6^ II --EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 -- -- OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD29) II 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 930.1 FEET (NGVD29) 29.5 29.6 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM DESC)RIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 13 and that part of Lot 12 lying southerly of a line running parallel with and distance 71.2 feet northerly of from the south line of said Lot 13, Shady -wood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 1720 Shadywood Road, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (Unshaded) and AE (X: area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain and AE: the I% chance flood also known as the base flood 931.0 feet (NGVD) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO303F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 12,649 s.f. - 0.290 acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: SAMS which has an elevation of: 941.03 feet (NGVD29). 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (1 Family Lakeshore Residential 1/2 acres per the City of Orono's zoning map dated September 2016. Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area (Tier 1) Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 7) Wetland Delineation: No wetland delineation was performed for this survey Proposed Elevations Proposed First Floor Elevation = 937.55 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 935.2 N X a) Fence ties are shown on the m° J I J side of the boundary line that xt� the fence is located on 4'/- X t'Vp RI\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 1 10 1 10 20 41 1 SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M V FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s `-•` BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE ITEc W", CTv CABLE TV X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. I CONCRETE CURB < .;I N P2, 1, OhN LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. N CONCRETE HYDRANT ❑C O - 96o Ic O T ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 6 CONTOUR PROPOSED Y SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -�-�- o -o -o-GUARD RAIL S SURVEY CONTROL POINT NDI ELECTRIC METER DT C le " C�=� © M A ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND „a°� l a,a �t . A GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE P LE <, c ❑H 1,61 Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND S9 SANITARY MANHOLE N X a) Fence ties are shown on the m° J I J side of the boundary line that xt� the fence is located on 4'/- X t'Vp RI\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 1 10 1 10 20 41 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER � 1 SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M CATCH BASIN FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s `-•` BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv CABLE TV X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT ❑C CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 96o _ CONTOUR EXISTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -�-�- o -o -o-GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT OE ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE LIGHT POLE © GAS METER ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND © GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE POWER POLE ❑H HAND HOLE Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND S9 SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SOIL BORING cas GAS UNDERGROUND TREE CONIFEROUS OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY SIGN 972.5GROUND ELEVATION 9 TREE DECIDUOUS 111111 11 " "" RAILROAD TRACKS % o STORM DRAIN OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER 1TELEPHONE PEDESTAL >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE 0_- TRAFFIC SIGNAL TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND �S YARD LIGHT Q UTILITY MANHOLE UT UTILITY UNDERGROUND D A/C UNIT 0 [01 UTILITY PEDESTAL WATERMAIN WELL TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.17 FILE NO. Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 32785-001 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER � 94 At MW _ k j%i f/ �-� ''� �`�� °go �.. � • � f � �' Y may. rt" _ F ►.' x ""'� " �. Aj ALEXANDER OESIGN Hansberger GROUP 3D Conceptual Illustration Copyright 2017 — Alexander Design Group Inc. WAS/W gam' a son fFy�T � • #� �,r # 3 4 7E RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO n �,! • 9' AONM OM GAR lk_ d% TOP BIpF{J I TOR OF ILIL � ?I CRALL TLF�EL- N7b' AC �----_ ram HALT 94EgLPB O"L METAL R=% 9F4M NOIED. M 61DN& PPR MW, RD 4 EATTEN som PER arv.. ItATLO rRFm Trr. WATEC WH= TRIM MoAMS Trp• TEG TWI som pM ELEv. .*K PER LLEY. M CUT STONE RR ELEv. _J b iI _ ll-�iR _ rl_ RIGHT ELEVATION U 6C,4LM Iw.rw COPYRIGHT 20TT, ALEXANDER DE6W4 GROUP, flsr_ LEFT ELEVATION Ems. Ww ABRAMLT omwd.Es OPTIONAL METAL WLXn 04M NMD. BFW Z SOW. PER PLEV. BOARD d BATTEN >sDPG PER ELEv. 61 MIRATE0 MOELE Trp. W MIRATEC BANDm TR84 moAgt* TTP. MIR m TRIM [MADE PER ELEv. DR4CKET6 PLR a".. P TNM CUT $TORE PER ELM k MCM wee GARAGE 4 9 7 7 �S %Z1 o m� GNeAEL RECEIVED Ter Gf M.Lm� - SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO PAIL• 942473.8227 i E3 ny 6� I TOR OF ILIL � ?I CRALL TLF�EL- N7b' AC �----_ ram HALT 94EgLPB O"L METAL R=% 9F4M NOIED. M 61DN& PPR MW, RD 4 EATTEN som PER arv.. ItATLO rRFm Trr. WATEC WH= TRIM MoAMS Trp• TEG TWI som pM ELEv. .*K PER LLEY. M CUT STONE RR ELEv. _J b iI _ ll-�iR _ rl_ RIGHT ELEVATION U 6C,4LM Iw.rw COPYRIGHT 20TT, ALEXANDER DE6W4 GROUP, flsr_ LEFT ELEVATION Ems. Ww ABRAMLT omwd.Es OPTIONAL METAL WLXn 04M NMD. BFW Z SOW. PER PLEV. BOARD d BATTEN >sDPG PER ELEv. 61 MIRATE0 MOELE Trp. W MIRATEC BANDm TR84 moAgt* TTP. MIR m TRIM [MADE PER ELEv. DR4CKET6 PLR a".. P TNM CUT $TORE PER ELM k MCM wee GARAGE 4 9 7 7 �S %Z1 o m� GNeAEL RECEIVED Ter Gf M.Lm� - SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO PAIL• 942473.8227 2017 MOM roarlocit rw- wee Lee- a1w vEt) 2017 COPYRIGNr 2M, a 9 SJIN� ipOTF!# a V�FP!- 9fY Eiv'���• l�DI v C�ldlLL lr/�l. 17�f �OOiI 02017 CITY OF ORONO a SII b �- ECMI6 OVEIl6NlAOS -- TT7r OF 61EILR �i dal &AReae TOP oP 6LAE _ Sl6I' CRAYL 6PACE TOr OP 6LAB STi9' COPYMS14T 20n, AALW(MOER DMW.?4 QWLP, INC. FRONT ELEVATION GcAA W - Mr REAR ELEVATION SCAM W -W ff ELEYATtaN NOT & ABrNALT 8NN7LE6 OPTIONAL MAL ROOAB "M No= 6NAKE 80Ma rSR l?LEv. COAL® 1 BATTEN 6010 PER El". 6'MAW "tm TM. 6" M"QATEO WIDOW TM BOA" "r, MMAM TW 5,ANP8 PER MXV BRACNEM PER ELEV. 71 TNM pIT 6TOTE PER ELEv. 6! pd� - Mm Rim u MST MAA �_ Toraeu>,aR epAnL ePAcs ELEVATION NOTE6 A6r44l.T 6NMGLl6 OPTTONAL METAL ROM W4M NO= 6FIW 60N9 PER E.Ev. BOARD 1 BATTEN /0M3 PSR ELEV. W MIRATEO EPE=E m- 6" MM ATM WMM MM BOAF06 TYP, MWATEO TRIO BAd96 PSR TLEV. VRACNETb PER ELEV. T TNPI = 6TONE PER K". ascm999FIIIL!��OO..R�IR!AAA - TOr OF R as FWT Rl= mvv_ TaraFeEe�R 9352' _ s g1AUL 6��PLLA,,11O66E �� swig 3 9 7 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO EXISTING CONDITIONS `1 E45TING HOUSE 91CO I - v3.o ''r°: 933+PO �3ar932.ay11=Sag'; '57"E 184.5E I� 931.0© 9339 T / FTD P V2 NND W'6cr FND IP IJa s. as u, 95.00 I. r*9336 fop ani 9]7.7 4712 �T---__--__.-� 5111\ - i1�µ�'CPPtN9 r _ =933.9 D 1-'__ EmbE,2 22.1 rJ / xo 5 33.9 3~I1. 55%59755 21.3 SSG.) 9349 Aq. 0 n 5 7.8 - 7.1 �! a 9334 R�- .b U! r �5.1 4�•� �! �r5f �.I EXISTING NL115E 1'9 7UI9J3. 71 -9.039 N 7.8 HD !r -i 26,3 ,a5\ti`�a3a.3 FAGERNESS M 1 � '2 1332 � 933T "A Ei 7T77��,.7+ p P-� 4 4 POINT RD. I® I1 9 03. EXISTING n 959 L O GARAGE �x 9 9317 S 29.1 1 1 973. �, w_ 5� 31.0 935 931 ------ 939_ . 939,2= 931.7- _213.2 _ /FRET. 1YAL1.. 34.6 '933. _ .034¢1 ;> - guD 97`.9 iND IP al 8 98. 1 935,E 93tl '� ni I1 933.0 � / 9359'N 93`.5 E%ISTING HOUSE `" 7y 933.9 I 'I A 11 I `r 1I l 1 l 1 3 x s3"s H.9 / F! rP IM 93344 �.{j-f 9329y yy ' To _ 933.7 9332 FNr P 3/, 933! O I M� 933.! via FAGERNESS ! N POINT RD. 10 �N San 1P U755 � - 4 l-- 32 � Y I 1F 33- PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED FULL BASEMENT 1720 SHAOYWOOO ROAD Li a3sz °�� PR'CWOSEO otiI�WAY �~ 9313 i' SIW � 8310 ® O 933. 934.e�- 931,5 a "f 9sy.P =vas x'1.2 FN9 P Y/2 SOLID 9552 OMM 9i' 9315 14'r 1334 9340 `SEp31,0 9•�9. 934.D x933.9 9333x l a 3,1 �ws\ 'I e i 9 1 =933. C �a 9310 DESi A 1 DECK v 2 I/ J. N 4939832)0 SPR 36- ' f 3ex 933.9 . 8347 + ! o 9336 977, 6 y F6n P�2 1 432.6 6 �� = 931'5 r 933 Gua 95.W fan IP 1/2 SOLID 8332 .9.8 SURVEY LEGEND T l IIF 30' -9339 "933.1 LAR DOORS: 1504 r� _ CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN 9353 36 933. -ani s I(+O YEAR FLOOD ELEVA71GN_ 9301 FEET (NGV029) wgP 939' _ r '24'E 173.8x. ; ® ® '31A x9!39 8333= 93.9 y Y fir-) r951 -a713 2: A E�S� 9 A C-,) LAR& 9.fi - RECEIVED 1 - r 11' 09.5 M. POWER POLE Be IP r 9 --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE �+x9338 •.073.0 SER 2 0 2017 WS G # 3 9 7 Eli fi ) I iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI a 1 li StORM MANHOLE --_EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 OHW ELEVATION: 929,4 (ELT (NGV029) W YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION; R3O.1 FEET (NGVD29) s A. 0. (TIONS USE INCLUDNG COPYING, mBiRBUreON. ANGOR l helehy terrify LW W9 emygy,Pba or roomer wan prepared by on a ander my dims sgmVisim and shat I an a Ary Licensed TVFIE t EF9a 9Naf20t7 PROPOSED CONDITIONS CGNVEYANCE OF NPORMATWNWFTHB PRODUCT IS Land anderme taws athe 5pasoFtdinnawoL gtts eO DRMTN SftnCTLY PROHISIIED WiNOUTSATHRGNaWSDUBT. N9G3 4, Rb< DEP EXPE69WD7TENAUTHORRATION. umvffrHotrr&juD DabdihAMh 91ft 2017. SATHRE-BERGOUIST INC, AUTHORWTION OoNsTnUrEss AN ILLEGrGaWTE USE AND m uFEOP ALL ALL RESFIGNsusY gy sATFY9ATpGm&Ir, SE OF 1 a ,,,, ro 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA9, mN1.65381 (952)476-60M �p ALLR RIGHTTO HOL SSWiLL GMMALLTEU INC.e1C. RESERVES 7 0 THEFUIGFITTO HOLD ANIYILLEC>♦r1M/F4 utS9t ORPAR7Y �" ^ P Ne WWW.SATNRE.00M DATE LECALLYRESPONSFUS FOR DAMAGES ORLOSII DaYidD.1'®ba9m�Pl4 Miannon LoemmH0. 394 '�@A9 PF S osAI5,N7 RP-BlATS16 FROM DLEGpadATE LOBE. _. .. t� h. - Dr RHvnCN OF PROPERTY 9[RIVEYM Lot 13 and that part ofLot 12 tying southerly of a line sunning parallel with and di71..3 feet eorthedy of Sam the south ]ion of said Lot 13, Shady+wood, ILmo ding In the recorded plat thereof HwI Conary, bd mMOU . STANDARD NOTES 1) Ske AA9me: 1720 Rhadywood Road, Orono, Minoesom 5539[ 2) Final 7 -me, Infoemadan: This propeAy appears ED he in Zone 1G(Urmheded),IWAE(X: area ddemNimd 0 b onside fhc 0.2%annual chance flood plain and AE: the 1% chance hood also I[gown as Ihebase flood 931.0 fans MVD) per Flood kn mm Rare Map Canmlmity PNmcl Na 27053CG303F, aftfi c dam of NovesmI 4,2016. 3) Farce] Asea Iefarnudm: Gross Am: 12,649 sl - 0.290 acres 4) Denelms7k: Elevanarm ase based oat MN= Geodetic Siphon Name SAh1S which has an elevahm of 941.03 ]icer (NGVD29). 5) Taming 1011braadm: The corm Zoning foc the subject property is f R 1C p Passably L kcuhom Residential In wars per the City of Oromh caning map dated SepMmber 2016. Petcet�Stnrohae 8e16sr1mSat6arlm - Forst 30 fiba (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 &et Lanka: 75 feat (FTom Drdeamy High wale, Lme) Height 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of [at ern (Tier 1) Plee6e nota 7691 the gmeml rtaDr(aiwy for We aabject)wpeM n3ay I+ave been amended though a city process We mold he unaww of mxb an r menm d they are sot io n ceemdad document pmvidod B m. We rommmend that a zoning kner be abmmed fomdLc Zoning Admi>ssssramr for the aaranl aal,ietims fArthia sires 6) 1011,11tttm: We have shown the 1oeWica ofutilitin on the surveyed popery by observed evideAcm only. There may be uodeigrmmd stilities encumbering the subject properly we: 4a anaaere. Phase sale Ibat wan have rat planed a Cmpha Sole Om Callfarthissurvey. Them may m may act be un3sagromd utilities in the mapped aes, shesefere extreme omatan muss he exerei6m befam anlr excavation rskee placemac nee, this site. Befoeedigging, youagemquaxdbylawiom*[wpba SI Om Cag m least 4g home is mNY at 44]]4544)002 7) Weiland DeSneaden:Now'edend deimeetimn wan parfarmed fm this RM 'raposraa..:-_ -., .,:r_ -937.55 'mpaed Oarugl Flom Bkvadm -935.2 SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND 93N.'b t_,D '- l IIF 30' -9339 "933.1 BITUMINOUS 9 x 9s� �D :3±. Iii10 0347 - _-EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/37/17 -" OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD,9} .S CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN 9353 36 933. -ani s I(+O YEAR FLOOD ELEVA71GN_ 9301 FEET (NGV029) wgP 939' _ r '24'E 173.8x. ; FND P 1� 932.6 �` b- HYDRANT y Y fir-) r951 -a713 DUR PROPOSE] A E�S� 9 A C-,) LAR& 9.fi - RECEIVED 1 - r � GAS METER -ret-- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M. POWER POLE G1 GAS VALVE --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE ® HAND HOLE -ran- FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SER 2 0 2017 SO" ---e4''- GAS UNDEflfRG1ND # 3 9 7 Eli -mu- OVERHEAD UTILITY GROUND ELEVATION -y U TREE DECIDUOUS iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI STORM DRAIN CIN OF ORONO (TIONS USE INCLUDNG COPYING, mBiRBUreON. ANGOR l helehy terrify LW W9 emygy,Pba or roomer wan prepared by on a ander my dims sgmVisim and shat I an a Ary Licensed TVFIE t EF9a 9Naf20t7 PROPOSED CONDITIONS CGNVEYANCE OF NPORMATWNWFTHB PRODUCT IS Land anderme taws athe 5pasoFtdinnawoL gtts eO DRMTN SftnCTLY PROHISIIED WiNOUTSATHRGNaWSDUBT. N9G3 4, Rb< DEP EXPE69WD7TENAUTHORRATION. umvffrHotrr&juD DabdihAMh 91ft 2017. SATHRE-BERGOUIST INC, AUTHORWTION OoNsTnUrEss AN ILLEGrGaWTE USE AND m uFEOP ALL ALL RESFIGNsusY gy sATFY9ATpGm&Ir, SE OF 1 a ,,,, ro 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA9, mN1.65381 (952)476-60M �p ALLR RIGHTTO HOL SSWiLL GMMALLTEU INC.e1C. RESERVES 7 0 THEFUIGFITTO HOLD ANIYILLEC>♦r1M/F4 utS9t ORPAR7Y �" ^ P Ne WWW.SATNRE.00M DATE LECALLYRESPONSFUS FOR DAMAGES ORLOSII DaYidD.1'®ba9m�Pl4 Miannon LoemmH0. 394 '�@A9 PF S osAI5,N7 RP-BlATS16 FROM DLEGpadATE LOBE. _. .. t� h. - Dr RHvnCN OF PROPERTY 9[RIVEYM Lot 13 and that part ofLot 12 tying southerly of a line sunning parallel with and di71..3 feet eorthedy of Sam the south ]ion of said Lot 13, Shady+wood, ILmo ding In the recorded plat thereof HwI Conary, bd mMOU . STANDARD NOTES 1) Ske AA9me: 1720 Rhadywood Road, Orono, Minoesom 5539[ 2) Final 7 -me, Infoemadan: This propeAy appears ED he in Zone 1G(Urmheded),IWAE(X: area ddemNimd 0 b onside fhc 0.2%annual chance flood plain and AE: the 1% chance hood also I[gown as Ihebase flood 931.0 fans MVD) per Flood kn mm Rare Map Canmlmity PNmcl Na 27053CG303F, aftfi c dam of NovesmI 4,2016. 3) Farce] Asea Iefarnudm: Gross Am: 12,649 sl - 0.290 acres 4) Denelms7k: Elevanarm ase based oat MN= Geodetic Siphon Name SAh1S which has an elevahm of 941.03 ]icer (NGVD29). 5) Taming 1011braadm: The corm Zoning foc the subject property is f R 1C p Passably L kcuhom Residential In wars per the City of Oromh caning map dated SepMmber 2016. Petcet�Stnrohae 8e16sr1mSat6arlm - Forst 30 fiba (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 &et Lanka: 75 feat (FTom Drdeamy High wale, Lme) Height 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of [at ern (Tier 1) Plee6e nota 7691 the gmeml rtaDr(aiwy for We aabject)wpeM n3ay I+ave been amended though a city process We mold he unaww of mxb an r menm d they are sot io n ceemdad document pmvidod B m. We rommmend that a zoning kner be abmmed fomdLc Zoning Admi>ssssramr for the aaranl aal,ietims fArthia sires 6) 1011,11tttm: We have shown the 1oeWica ofutilitin on the surveyed popery by observed evideAcm only. There may be uodeigrmmd stilities encumbering the subject properly we: 4a anaaere. Phase sale Ibat wan have rat planed a Cmpha Sole Om Callfarthissurvey. Them may m may act be un3sagromd utilities in the mapped aes, shesefere extreme omatan muss he exerei6m befam anlr excavation rskee placemac nee, this site. Befoeedigging, youagemquaxdbylawiom*[wpba SI Om Cag m least 4g home is mNY at 44]]4544)002 7) Weiland DeSneaden:Now'edend deimeetimn wan parfarmed fm this RM 'raposraa..:-_ -., .,:r_ -937.55 'mpaed Oarugl Flom Bkvadm -935.2 t^ zx � 4 Fence gmare alta9w0 an ma 4 aide nl ]fie boundary the that the fence is locffW on. �4x R emlplB ma i am m err mane a1Ca91q' CbMsnr4 81rkm MAD 83.890 .4) 20 In O In 20 40 SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS 19 CATCH BASRN FIFE MT FLOOR ELEVATION BLILDINC SETBACK LINE FLARED END SECTION CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN -e,v-- M TOF TOP CF FOUNDATION ELEV. T O LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. T b- HYDRANT y Y S C m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER DUR PROPOSE] A 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE _ GUAR ""- GUARD RLL LAR& 40 FaCTRC METER - � - CHAIN TILE t^ zx � 4 Fence gmare alta9w0 an ma 4 aide nl ]fie boundary the that the fence is locffW on. �4x R emlplB ma i am m err mane a1Ca91q' CbMsnr4 81rkm MAD 83.890 .4) 20 In O In 20 40 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 327as-mi ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS 19 CATCH BASRN FIFE MT FLOOR ELEVATION BLILDINC SETBACK LINE FLARED END SECTION CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN -e,v-- PO GATE VALVE TOF TOP CF FOUNDATION ELEV. CABLE TV GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE OURS CONCRETE b- HYDRANT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL`a9c_ CONTOUR £OUSTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER DUR PROPOSE] • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE _ GUAR ""- GUARD RLL SURVEY CONTROL PONT 40 FaCTRC METER - � - CHAIN TILE UGHT POLE � GAS METER -ret-- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M. POWER POLE G1 GAS VALVE --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE ® HAND HOLE -ran- FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND Q SANITARY GLEANOUT SO" ---e4''- GAS UNDEflfRG1ND v 5yTy TREE CONIFERGIS -mu- OVERHEAD UTILITY GROUND ELEVATION -y U TREE DECIDUOUS iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI STORM DRAIN Ur TELEPHONE MANHOLE -x-SANITARY SEWER StORM MANHOLE P) TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -9- STORM SEWER 0 YARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL G- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LIGHT ® 0 UTILITY MANHOLE -uit- UTILITY UNOERONOUHO A/C UNIT WELL . UTxUTY PEDESTAL I - WATERMNN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 327as-mi ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER 94 At MW _ k j%i f/ �-� ''� �`�� °go �.. � • � f � �' Y may. rt" _ F ►.' x ""'� " �. Aj ALEXANDER OESIGN Hansberger GROUP 3D Conceptual Illustration Copyright 2017 — Alexander Design Group Inc. WAS/W gam' a son fFy�T � • #� �,r # 3 4 7E RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO n �,! • 9' AONM OM GAR lk_ d% TOP BIpF{J I TOR OF ILIL � ?I CRALL TLF�EL- N7b' AC �----_ ram HALT 94EgLPB O"L METAL R=% 9F4M NOIED. M 61DN& PPR MW, RD 4 EATTEN som PER arv.. ItATLO rRFm Trr. WATEC WH= TRIM MoAMS Trp• TEG TWI som pM ELEv. .*K PER LLEY. M CUT STONE RR ELEv. _J b iI _ ll-�iR _ rl_ RIGHT ELEVATION U 6C,4LM Iw.rw COPYRIGHT 20TT, ALEXANDER DE6W4 GROUP, flsr_ LEFT ELEVATION Ems. Ww ABRAMLT omwd.Es OPTIONAL METAL WLXn 04M NMD. BFW Z SOW. PER PLEV. BOARD d BATTEN >sDPG PER ELEv. 61 MIRATE0 MOELE Trp. W MIRATEC BANDm TR84 moAgt* TTP. MIR m TRIM [MADE PER ELEv. DR4CKET6 PLR a".. P TNM CUT $TORE PER ELM k MCM wee GARAGE 4 9 7 7 �S %Z1 o m� GNeAEL RECEIVED Ter Gf M.Lm� - SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO PAIL• 942473.8227 i E3 ny 6� I TOR OF ILIL � ?I CRALL TLF�EL- N7b' AC �----_ ram HALT 94EgLPB O"L METAL R=% 9F4M NOIED. M 61DN& PPR MW, RD 4 EATTEN som PER arv.. ItATLO rRFm Trr. WATEC WH= TRIM MoAMS Trp• TEG TWI som pM ELEv. .*K PER LLEY. M CUT STONE RR ELEv. _J b iI _ ll-�iR _ rl_ RIGHT ELEVATION U 6C,4LM Iw.rw COPYRIGHT 20TT, ALEXANDER DE6W4 GROUP, flsr_ LEFT ELEVATION Ems. Ww ABRAMLT omwd.Es OPTIONAL METAL WLXn 04M NMD. BFW Z SOW. PER PLEV. BOARD d BATTEN >sDPG PER ELEv. 61 MIRATE0 MOELE Trp. W MIRATEC BANDm TR84 moAgt* TTP. MIR m TRIM [MADE PER ELEv. DR4CKET6 PLR a".. P TNM CUT $TORE PER ELM k MCM wee GARAGE 4 9 7 7 �S %Z1 o m� GNeAEL RECEIVED Ter Gf M.Lm� - SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO PAIL• 942473.8227 2017 MOM roarlocit rw- wee Lee- a1w vEt) 2017 COPYRIGNr 2M, a 9 SJIN� ipOTF!# a V�FP!- 9fY Eiv'���• l�DI v C�ldlLL lr/�l. 17�f �OOiI 02017 CITY OF ORONO a SII b �- ECMI6 OVEIl6NlAOS -- TT7r OF 61EILR �i dal &AReae TOP oP 6LAE _ Sl6I' CRAYL 6PACE TOr OP 6LAB STi9' COPYMS14T 20n, AALW(MOER DMW.?4 QWLP, INC. FRONT ELEVATION GcAA W - Mr REAR ELEVATION SCAM W -W ff ELEYATtaN NOT & ABrNALT 8NN7LE6 OPTIONAL MAL ROOAB "M No= 6NAKE 80Ma rSR l?LEv. COAL® 1 BATTEN 6010 PER El". 6'MAW "tm TM. 6" M"QATEO WIDOW TM BOA" "r, MMAM TW 5,ANP8 PER MXV BRACNEM PER ELEV. 71 TNM pIT 6TOTE PER ELEv. 6! pd� - Mm Rim u MST MAA �_ Toraeu>,aR epAnL ePAcs ELEVATION NOTE6 A6r44l.T 6NMGLl6 OPTTONAL METAL ROM W4M NO= 6FIW 60N9 PER E.Ev. BOARD 1 BATTEN /0M3 PSR ELEV. W MIRATEO EPE=E m- 6" MM ATM WMM MM BOAF06 TYP, MWATEO TRIO BAd96 PSR TLEV. VRACNETb PER ELEV. T TNPI = 6TONE PER K". ascm999FIIIL!��OO..R�IR!AAA - TOr OF R as FWT Rl= mvv_ TaraFeEe�R 9352' _ s g1AUL 6��PLLA,,11O66E �� swig 3 9 7 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO EXISTING CONDITIONS `1 E45TING HOUSE 91CO I - v3.o ''r°: 933+PO �3ar932.ay11=Sag'; '57"E 184.5E I� 931.0© 9339 T / FTD P V2 NND W'6cr FND IP IJa s. as u, 95.00 I. r*9336 fop ani 9]7.7 4712 �T---__--__.-� 5111\ - i1�µ�'CPPtN9 r _ =933.9 D 1-'__ EmbE,2 22.1 rJ / xo 5 33.9 3~I1. 55%59755 21.3 SSG.) 9349 Aq. 0 n 5 7.8 - 7.1 �! a 9334 R�- .b U! r �5.1 4�•� �! �r5f �.I EXISTING NL115E 1'9 7UI9J3. 71 -9.039 N 7.8 HD !r -i 26,3 ,a5\ti`�a3a.3 FAGERNESS M 1 � '2 1332 � 933T "A Ei 7T77��,.7+ p P-� 4 4 POINT RD. I® I1 9 03. EXISTING n 959 L O GARAGE �x 9 9317 S 29.1 1 1 973. �, w_ 5� 31.0 935 931 ------ 939_ . 939,2= 931.7- _213.2 _ /FRET. 1YAL1.. 34.6 '933. _ .034¢1 ;> - guD 97`.9 iND IP al 8 98. 1 935,E 93tl '� ni I1 933.0 � / 9359'N 93`.5 E%ISTING HOUSE `" 7y 933.9 I 'I A 11 I `r 1I l 1 l 1 3 x s3"s H.9 / F! rP IM 93344 �.{j-f 9329y yy ' To _ 933.7 9332 FNr P 3/, 933! O I M� 933.! via FAGERNESS ! N POINT RD. 10 �N San 1P U755 � - 4 l-- 32 � Y I 1F 33- PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED FULL BASEMENT 1720 SHAOYWOOO ROAD Li a3sz °�� PR'CWOSEO otiI�WAY �~ 9313 i' SIW � 8310 ® O 933. 934.e�- 931,5 a "f 9sy.P =vas x'1.2 FN9 P Y/2 SOLID 9552 OMM 9i' 9315 14'r 1334 9340 `SEp31,0 9•�9. 934.D x933.9 9333x l a 3,1 �ws\ 'I e i 9 1 =933. C �a 9310 DESi A 1 DECK v 2 I/ J. N 4939832)0 SPR 36- ' f 3ex 933.9 . 8347 + ! o 9336 977, 6 y F6n P�2 1 432.6 6 �� = 931'5 r 933 Gua 95.W fan IP 1/2 SOLID 8332 .9.8 SURVEY LEGEND T l IIF 30' -9339 "933.1 LAR DOORS: 1504 r� _ CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN 9353 36 933. -ani s I(+O YEAR FLOOD ELEVA71GN_ 9301 FEET (NGV029) wgP 939' _ r '24'E 173.8x. ; ® ® '31A x9!39 8333= 93.9 y Y fir-) r951 -a713 2: A E�S� 9 A C-,) LAR& 9.fi - RECEIVED 1 - r 11' 09.5 M. POWER POLE Be IP r 9 --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE �+x9338 •.073.0 SER 2 0 2017 WS G # 3 9 7 Eli fi ) I iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI a 1 li StORM MANHOLE --_EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 OHW ELEVATION: 929,4 (ELT (NGV029) W YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION; R3O.1 FEET (NGVD29) s A. 0. (TIONS USE INCLUDNG COPYING, mBiRBUreON. ANGOR l helehy terrify LW W9 emygy,Pba or roomer wan prepared by on a ander my dims sgmVisim and shat I an a Ary Licensed TVFIE t EF9a 9Naf20t7 PROPOSED CONDITIONS CGNVEYANCE OF NPORMATWNWFTHB PRODUCT IS Land anderme taws athe 5pasoFtdinnawoL gtts eO DRMTN SftnCTLY PROHISIIED WiNOUTSATHRGNaWSDUBT. N9G3 4, Rb< DEP EXPE69WD7TENAUTHORRATION. umvffrHotrr&juD DabdihAMh 91ft 2017. SATHRE-BERGOUIST INC, AUTHORWTION OoNsTnUrEss AN ILLEGrGaWTE USE AND m uFEOP ALL ALL RESFIGNsusY gy sATFY9ATpGm&Ir, SE OF 1 a ,,,, ro 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA9, mN1.65381 (952)476-60M �p ALLR RIGHTTO HOL SSWiLL GMMALLTEU INC.e1C. RESERVES 7 0 THEFUIGFITTO HOLD ANIYILLEC>♦r1M/F4 utS9t ORPAR7Y �" ^ P Ne WWW.SATNRE.00M DATE LECALLYRESPONSFUS FOR DAMAGES ORLOSII DaYidD.1'®ba9m�Pl4 Miannon LoemmH0. 394 '�@A9 PF S osAI5,N7 RP-BlATS16 FROM DLEGpadATE LOBE. _. .. t� h. - Dr RHvnCN OF PROPERTY 9[RIVEYM Lot 13 and that part ofLot 12 tying southerly of a line sunning parallel with and di71..3 feet eorthedy of Sam the south ]ion of said Lot 13, Shady+wood, ILmo ding In the recorded plat thereof HwI Conary, bd mMOU . STANDARD NOTES 1) Ske AA9me: 1720 Rhadywood Road, Orono, Minoesom 5539[ 2) Final 7 -me, Infoemadan: This propeAy appears ED he in Zone 1G(Urmheded),IWAE(X: area ddemNimd 0 b onside fhc 0.2%annual chance flood plain and AE: the 1% chance hood also I[gown as Ihebase flood 931.0 fans MVD) per Flood kn mm Rare Map Canmlmity PNmcl Na 27053CG303F, aftfi c dam of NovesmI 4,2016. 3) Farce] Asea Iefarnudm: Gross Am: 12,649 sl - 0.290 acres 4) Denelms7k: Elevanarm ase based oat MN= Geodetic Siphon Name SAh1S which has an elevahm of 941.03 ]icer (NGVD29). 5) Taming 1011braadm: The corm Zoning foc the subject property is f R 1C p Passably L kcuhom Residential In wars per the City of Oromh caning map dated SepMmber 2016. Petcet�Stnrohae 8e16sr1mSat6arlm - Forst 30 fiba (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 &et Lanka: 75 feat (FTom Drdeamy High wale, Lme) Height 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of [at ern (Tier 1) Plee6e nota 7691 the gmeml rtaDr(aiwy for We aabject)wpeM n3ay I+ave been amended though a city process We mold he unaww of mxb an r menm d they are sot io n ceemdad document pmvidod B m. We rommmend that a zoning kner be abmmed fomdLc Zoning Admi>ssssramr for the aaranl aal,ietims fArthia sires 6) 1011,11tttm: We have shown the 1oeWica ofutilitin on the surveyed popery by observed evideAcm only. There may be uodeigrmmd stilities encumbering the subject properly we: 4a anaaere. Phase sale Ibat wan have rat planed a Cmpha Sole Om Callfarthissurvey. Them may m may act be un3sagromd utilities in the mapped aes, shesefere extreme omatan muss he exerei6m befam anlr excavation rskee placemac nee, this site. Befoeedigging, youagemquaxdbylawiom*[wpba SI Om Cag m least 4g home is mNY at 44]]4544)002 7) Weiland DeSneaden:Now'edend deimeetimn wan parfarmed fm this RM 'raposraa..:-_ -., .,:r_ -937.55 'mpaed Oarugl Flom Bkvadm -935.2 SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND 93N.'b t_,D '- l IIF 30' -9339 "933.1 BITUMINOUS 9 x 9s� �D :3±. Iii10 0347 - _-EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/37/17 -" OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD,9} .S CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN 9353 36 933. -ani s I(+O YEAR FLOOD ELEVA71GN_ 9301 FEET (NGV029) wgP 939' _ r '24'E 173.8x. ; FND P 1� 932.6 �` b- HYDRANT y Y fir-) r951 -a713 DUR PROPOSE] A E�S� 9 A C-,) LAR& 9.fi - RECEIVED 1 - r � GAS METER -ret-- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M. POWER POLE G1 GAS VALVE --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE ® HAND HOLE -ran- FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND SER 2 0 2017 SO" ---e4''- GAS UNDEflfRG1ND # 3 9 7 Eli -mu- OVERHEAD UTILITY GROUND ELEVATION -y U TREE DECIDUOUS iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI STORM DRAIN CIN OF ORONO (TIONS USE INCLUDNG COPYING, mBiRBUreON. ANGOR l helehy terrify LW W9 emygy,Pba or roomer wan prepared by on a ander my dims sgmVisim and shat I an a Ary Licensed TVFIE t EF9a 9Naf20t7 PROPOSED CONDITIONS CGNVEYANCE OF NPORMATWNWFTHB PRODUCT IS Land anderme taws athe 5pasoFtdinnawoL gtts eO DRMTN SftnCTLY PROHISIIED WiNOUTSATHRGNaWSDUBT. N9G3 4, Rb< DEP EXPE69WD7TENAUTHORRATION. umvffrHotrr&juD DabdihAMh 91ft 2017. SATHRE-BERGOUIST INC, AUTHORWTION OoNsTnUrEss AN ILLEGrGaWTE USE AND m uFEOP ALL ALL RESFIGNsusY gy sATFY9ATpGm&Ir, SE OF 1 a ,,,, ro 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA9, mN1.65381 (952)476-60M �p ALLR RIGHTTO HOL SSWiLL GMMALLTEU INC.e1C. RESERVES 7 0 THEFUIGFITTO HOLD ANIYILLEC>♦r1M/F4 utS9t ORPAR7Y �" ^ P Ne WWW.SATNRE.00M DATE LECALLYRESPONSFUS FOR DAMAGES ORLOSII DaYidD.1'®ba9m�Pl4 Miannon LoemmH0. 394 '�@A9 PF S osAI5,N7 RP-BlATS16 FROM DLEGpadATE LOBE. _. .. t� h. - Dr RHvnCN OF PROPERTY 9[RIVEYM Lot 13 and that part ofLot 12 tying southerly of a line sunning parallel with and di71..3 feet eorthedy of Sam the south ]ion of said Lot 13, Shady+wood, ILmo ding In the recorded plat thereof HwI Conary, bd mMOU . STANDARD NOTES 1) Ske AA9me: 1720 Rhadywood Road, Orono, Minoesom 5539[ 2) Final 7 -me, Infoemadan: This propeAy appears ED he in Zone 1G(Urmheded),IWAE(X: area ddemNimd 0 b onside fhc 0.2%annual chance flood plain and AE: the 1% chance hood also I[gown as Ihebase flood 931.0 fans MVD) per Flood kn mm Rare Map Canmlmity PNmcl Na 27053CG303F, aftfi c dam of NovesmI 4,2016. 3) Farce] Asea Iefarnudm: Gross Am: 12,649 sl - 0.290 acres 4) Denelms7k: Elevanarm ase based oat MN= Geodetic Siphon Name SAh1S which has an elevahm of 941.03 ]icer (NGVD29). 5) Taming 1011braadm: The corm Zoning foc the subject property is f R 1C p Passably L kcuhom Residential In wars per the City of Oromh caning map dated SepMmber 2016. Petcet�Stnrohae 8e16sr1mSat6arlm - Forst 30 fiba (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 &et Lanka: 75 feat (FTom Drdeamy High wale, Lme) Height 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of [at ern (Tier 1) Plee6e nota 7691 the gmeml rtaDr(aiwy for We aabject)wpeM n3ay I+ave been amended though a city process We mold he unaww of mxb an r menm d they are sot io n ceemdad document pmvidod B m. We rommmend that a zoning kner be abmmed fomdLc Zoning Admi>ssssramr for the aaranl aal,ietims fArthia sires 6) 1011,11tttm: We have shown the 1oeWica ofutilitin on the surveyed popery by observed evideAcm only. There may be uodeigrmmd stilities encumbering the subject properly we: 4a anaaere. Phase sale Ibat wan have rat planed a Cmpha Sole Om Callfarthissurvey. Them may m may act be un3sagromd utilities in the mapped aes, shesefere extreme omatan muss he exerei6m befam anlr excavation rskee placemac nee, this site. Befoeedigging, youagemquaxdbylawiom*[wpba SI Om Cag m least 4g home is mNY at 44]]4544)002 7) Weiland DeSneaden:Now'edend deimeetimn wan parfarmed fm this RM 'raposraa..:-_ -., .,:r_ -937.55 'mpaed Oarugl Flom Bkvadm -935.2 t^ zx � 4 Fence gmare alta9w0 an ma 4 aide nl ]fie boundary the that the fence is locffW on. �4x R emlplB ma i am m err mane a1Ca91q' CbMsnr4 81rkm MAD 83.890 .4) 20 In O In 20 40 SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS 19 CATCH BASRN FIFE MT FLOOR ELEVATION BLILDINC SETBACK LINE FLARED END SECTION CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN -e,v-- M TOF TOP CF FOUNDATION ELEV. T O LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. T b- HYDRANT y Y S C m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER DUR PROPOSE] A 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE _ GUAR ""- GUARD RLL LAR& 40 FaCTRC METER - � - CHAIN TILE t^ zx � 4 Fence gmare alta9w0 an ma 4 aide nl ]fie boundary the that the fence is locffW on. �4x R emlplB ma i am m err mane a1Ca91q' CbMsnr4 81rkm MAD 83.890 .4) 20 In O In 20 40 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 327as-mi ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER SCALE IN FEEL' SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS 19 CATCH BASRN FIFE MT FLOOR ELEVATION BLILDINC SETBACK LINE FLARED END SECTION CPE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATnoN -e,v-- PO GATE VALVE TOF TOP CF FOUNDATION ELEV. CABLE TV GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE OURS CONCRETE b- HYDRANT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL`a9c_ CONTOUR £OUSTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER DUR PROPOSE] • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE _ GUAR ""- GUARD RLL SURVEY CONTROL PONT 40 FaCTRC METER - � - CHAIN TILE UGHT POLE � GAS METER -ret-- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND M. POWER POLE G1 GAS VALVE --9-x- FENCE ® SANITARY MANHOLE ® HAND HOLE -ran- FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND Q SANITARY GLEANOUT SO" ---e4''- GAS UNDEflfRG1ND v 5yTy TREE CONIFERGIS -mu- OVERHEAD UTILITY GROUND ELEVATION -y U TREE DECIDUOUS iF4♦14HHH4 H RA3LROA0 TRACI STORM DRAIN Ur TELEPHONE MANHOLE -x-SANITARY SEWER StORM MANHOLE P) TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -9- STORM SEWER 0 YARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL G- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LIGHT ® 0 UTILITY MANHOLE -uit- UTILITY UNOERONOUHO A/C UNIT WELL . UTxUTY PEDESTAL I - WATERMNN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 327as-mi ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER EXISTING CONDITIONS \ 1 1 i 934.2 z �� x 933.7 EXISTING HOUSE x 933.1 /� 1 _ -33 x 932,9 / j 934.0 934.2 x 933.6 x 9.2 932.3 \� MAP 60" \9 - o p + 934.0 i \ 934.0 933.5 / \ 933.4 3 932.9--/�$9 28 57 E 180.5 � �q 933.9 rt 933.3 S FND IP I/2 FND IP POL FND IP 1/2 LO _ II 932. 934.2 4 34.6_ -93 933.2 3.22 933.033.1 - o FND IP I/2 SOLID / 4 33.4 95.00 933.2 - 1 33. 933. x 933.7 �10 934.5 934.0 I x 933.1 X 9 4. * 933.6 CP BIR 3 933.4 x 933 4 933,E--� MAP IS 933.4 X 3 g.- °� ems ex-ese�-esN 9934.0 933.7 g 933.4\ - �AN�SG T L3�.91 34.0 �C--x 933.9 933.2 ��_- X933.\ F 43/4 _ 934.1 33 6- 4. S 9 3:3 / IC1 \ 22.1 J� 93 8 - x\933.6 / 934.0 0/ /�/ "19 9304.0 x 933.9 933.3x 1 1 �TNH= ` 1 \3.5 933.3-g- 335 \ x 933.5 933.9 FFE= / I (I�j N, o 934'7 934.9 I I 934.1 936.4 - I'1 933 6 933 4..� 0934.0 % % I 7. 935.0 934.0 _ rG ° 7.8 / BIR IS" 933.4 - FFE=9 o �F.. n N •r I(7 x933.4 v -93� 933.4 1 1 �z / 35.1 EXISTI G�yJSE 33.4 933.3 933.7 x1 E 933.9 7.8 i Q / n J x 933.8 Q 933.6 _ ; 9. 4,d . 9 g /934.3 21.3 934 I j 935.0 \ r 1 Q I /26.31 i iC� ° ❑A 9.34.8 0/ DECK 934.2 EAGERNESS I �' N x 933.2 I 933.2 1 GEE= z 3 933.7 .r I WOE= I P �' N 934.1 Q -� 1 935_0__ -� IG) DINT�• `� - g 933.3x -/ GAI TGE I B% /� o �x 934.0 / - 934.9 935.0 34.2 932 8 I o N o N 935.7 29l / \ CURB 933. STOP / Q 933.81 934.2 x 934.5 I:i 34 4----938ML.2 -- 934_3 934.0 x 933.1 SPR 36" x 933.9 / ® - 933.6 26.��TE1CLese�-935. 4.6 ��_-� 934.7 0 OHU \ x 933.5LO 933.9 ter; �/Fr M x 94.3 01 / * o � -QHi 933.4 - 934.0�I 93 .0 I� 934.0 I �-- OHUr- X x 934.3 163 03934.8 x 933.6 933.0- �3 6 FND IP 12755 - - - 933.9 FND IP 1/� 934.4 934.9 1935.3 352 934.8 1 1 x 934.6 FND IP 2 932.9 933.5 x 934.7 ° it �f S8 �4 E 17 3.6 +/- 9�Q 932.6 oI I I- 93� x 934.8 / \ 1' = 935.8 935.5 7 c77771 \ �� 9 x 93.3 1 933.4 � � x 93413 _33- j EXISTING HOUSE 933.8 33 - 1 �I 1 1 �1 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 0 1 i 934.2 C x 933.7 / /> EXISTING HOUSE 1 � rn33 - x 933.1 x 93 - 2.9 / x 933.6 x 933.2 932.3 f _�y 933.5 \ MAP 011 \9`3`3 x 932.. �-S89°28'57"E 180.5+/ -r 933. 934.0 3 / FND IP POL FND IT 1/2 3 FND IP 1/2 933.2 933.0 1 FND IP 2 SOLID 1 / c I 93� 934.2 4 34.6- -934 --3.22 - = 12 933.4 95.00 I 0 933.2 734.5 --CONC. PAD � I x 933.1 33. 133.4 933. �� 934.Q� �-CELLAR DOORS o�� 934 MAP 18" BIR /" 3 _- - - r�_�- 15.0 933:4-- ` 933.7 x 9 15.0 32.5 0 - - „ - --O I 80. _3411 --- 933,2I _ (0A N� �3 ------ FND IP 3/4 .9343 / 933.3 _ �30 ! 36.5 t •V \ / x 93 .8 cs �o�s x /134.0 x 933.9 933.3 1 (� 9 1 _-15-- NI PROPOSED FULL BASEMENT TNH= a 936.4 133.5 933.3 1 172(?�,SHADYWOOD ROAD 115.0 a 34.5 Z ° SIL T FENCE, - _ n BIR 18" ----------49.5 1 - �� -- s' 933.4 933.4 Xj�9.i 2�X r; ROCKBERMBERM 9�i.9 N ENTRANCE 24 r ' . meq.. o 0 2< i m �1 933.4 9. W 4.590 I Q I J x 933.8 lin �. _ _ l L 06 I EAGERNESS i 93 . 93 q'�� POINT RD. to N o o • . o 9328 �.. ggx 9 .0 cn / 933. B �i W• '' �' ::., . ' 934.5x I x 933.1 \ L .>Tas�� s�i 5.0 934. x 32.0 0 SPR 36" / x 933.9 933.6' V} -Q / . x 933.5 ` 9 835 in u> x 9 4 934.7 0 oHU��� I1 933.4 , - _ 934. �� 93 . r 934.5) 16 Sl T FENC 0;-,,, 1 __ v 34. 3X3934._ x 933.6 933.0- U 6 FND IP 12755 - - T9JJ J 933 9 FND IP I/2/ 934.4 9�.\ / 935.3 35.2 934.8 1 x 93 .6 FND IP I/2 932.9 11 �933.�� x 934.7 // N S8 I I'�4��E 17, 932 ��Q 932.6 1 0 0 / of 9,3 934.8 X / \ z / X 9 77 G �/_ 3 x 931.3 933.4 34E EXISTING HOUSE I t- i 1 1 �1 FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/ORCT Land Surve o under the laws of the State of Minnesota. TVETE 1 EMW 9/18/2017 PROPOSED CONDITIONS Y CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS DRAWN 2 EMW 9/26/2017 UPDATE HARDCOVER, DRIVEWAY SIZE STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 6th y of Septe b , 2017. DBP AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND 1 CHECKED SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES �� C DBP THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES David B. Pemberton, PLS Minnesota License No. 40344 09/05/17 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. pemberton@sathre.com z9.5 �i29.6 r 29.5 II �� III O 129.5 II `� JI DOCK DOCK �9.6 II , -- EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD29) II 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 930.1 FEET (NGVD29) �29.s r 29.6 I129.5 �129.6 III � SII 29.5 II �� III 1129.5 II `� II DOCK DOCK ��9.6^ II --EDGE OF WATER LOCATED ON 8/30/17 -- -- OHW ELEVATION: 929.4 FEET (NGVD29) II 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 930.1 FEET (NGVD29) 29.5 29.6 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 WWW.SATHRE.COM DESC)RIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 13 and that part of Lot 12 lying southerly of a line running parallel with and distance 71.2 feet northerly of from the south line of said Lot 13, Shady -wood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 1720 Shadywood Road, Orono, Minnesota 55391 2) Flood Zone Information: This property appears to lie in Zone X (Unshaded) and AE (X: area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain and AE: the I% chance flood also known as the base flood 931.0 feet (NGVD) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053CO303F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 3) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 12,649 s.f. - 0.290 acres 4) Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: SAMS which has an elevation of: 941.03 feet (NGVD29). 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is LR -1C (1 Family Lakeshore Residential 1/2 acres per the City of Orono's zoning map dated September 2016. Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet (Shadywood Road) Side: 7.5 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25 percent of lot area (Tier 1) Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 7) Wetland Delineation: No wetland delineation was performed for this survey Proposed Elevations Proposed First Floor Elevation = 937.55 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 935.2 N X a) Fence ties are shown on the m° J I J side of the boundary line that xt� the fence is located on 4'/- X t'Vp RI\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 1 10 1 10 20 41 1 SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M V FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s `-•` BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE ITEc W", CTv CABLE TV X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. I CONCRETE CURB < .;I N P2, 1, OhN LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. N CONCRETE HYDRANT ❑C O - 96o Ic O T ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 6 CONTOUR PROPOSED Y SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -�-�- o -o -o-GUARD RAIL S SURVEY CONTROL POINT NDI ELECTRIC METER DT C le " C�=� © M A ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND „a°� l a,a �t . A GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE P LE <, c ❑H 1,61 Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND S9 SANITARY MANHOLE N X a) Fence ties are shown on the m° J I J side of the boundary line that xt� the fence is located on 4'/- X t'Vp RI\ Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) 1 10 1 10 20 41 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER � 1 SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS M CATCH BASIN FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION -s `-•` BUILDING SETBACK LINE a FLARED END SECTION GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CTv CABLE TV X GATE VALVE TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. CONCRETE CURB < GUY WIRE LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. CONCRETE HYDRANT ❑C CABLE TV PEDESTAL - 96o _ CONTOUR EXISTING O SURVEY MONUMENT SET ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER sso CONTOUR PROPOSED • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND O ELECTRIC MANHOLE -�-�- o -o -o-GUARD RAIL Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT OE ELECTRIC METER DT DRAIN TILE LIGHT POLE © GAS METER ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND © GAS VALVE -X-X- FENCE POWER POLE ❑H HAND HOLE Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND S9 SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SOIL BORING cas GAS UNDERGROUND TREE CONIFEROUS OHu OVERHEAD UTILITY SIGN 972.5GROUND ELEVATION 9 TREE DECIDUOUS 111111 11 " "" RAILROAD TRACKS % o STORM DRAIN OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER 1TELEPHONE PEDESTAL >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE 0_- TRAFFIC SIGNAL TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND �S YARD LIGHT Q UTILITY MANHOLE UT UTILITY UNDERGROUND D A/C UNIT 0 [01 UTILITY PEDESTAL WATERMAIN WELL TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.17 FILE NO. Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 32785-001 ORONO, PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA TRAVIS HANSBERGER � MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council Exhibit C #17-3978 10. #17-3978 ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF TRAVIS HANSBERGER, 1720 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 9:33 P.M. — 9:45 P.M. Kathy Alexander, Architect, was present along with Travis Hansberger, Applicant. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a rear setback of 24.8 feet, hardcover of 33.98 percent lot area, and lot width variances in order to build a new single-family home. The applicant is proposing to demo the existing home and construct a new single-family house. The house was signed to meet the structural coverage of the lot at 20 percent but the applicant is requesting a hardcover variance to allow for adequate driveway space and a patio. The existing lot has 35.74 percent hardcover and the new proposed home would have 33.98 percent. In addition, the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback for the principal structure of 24.8 feet where 30 feet is required. Lot area and lot width variances are also required. The existing home is nonconforming to the 75 -foot setback as well as the average lakeshore setback. The house has been designed to meet those City standards, which has resulted in the home being pushed further to the rear of the lot. The applicant is also proposing to move the driveway access along Shadywood Road. Since it is a county road, it would require approval through Hennepin County. The applicant is proposing to place the principal structure 24.8 feet from the rear property line where 30 feet is required. The existing garage is located two feet from the rear property line and the home is 52 feet from the rear property line. The applicant oriented the home to meet the lake yard setbacks, which are at a curve due to the nature of the lakeshore and caused the structure to be moved closer to the rear/street side of the property. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the land and the orientation of the existing home. The existing home is built at the tallest elevation on the lot. The topography then slopes down and away from the principal structure on all sides creating many slopes and hills on the property. The home also has septic and a wetland to the east and their well to the west of the principal structure. The addition would create a 15 -foot setback from the rear property line. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances if the Planning Commission finds the practical difficulties reasonable. A recommendation for approval should be contingent upon the applicant receiving approval from Hennepin County for moving the driveway access on a county road. If not approved, this could change the shape of the driveway altering the hardcover of the site. Kathryn Alexander, Architect, stated they have a signature supporting the project from the property owner to the south and that they have tried to contact the neighbor to the north but have been unsuccessful. Alexander indicated she can answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Thiesse requested she address the drainage and the driveway. Alexander noted it is only the lake side that was raised as well as a little bit on each side of the house. Alexander pointed out the areas that would be raised on the survey and pointed out a portion of the area that slopes back down toward Shadywood. Thiesse asked if there is a swale in the area near Shadywood. Alexander indicated there is a swale there and that the neighbor's property to the south is actually higher than this property. Alexander stated in speaking with the surveyor, he indicated he would have no problem making sure there could be a swale in that area. Alexander stated the reason for raising the grade is that it is very close to the OHWL and that there will only a partial basement under the house. Alexander noted there is a crawl space that is 3'/10.5" tall and they raised the back side in order to get enough crawl space. Alexander indicated they are still working on the driveway with Hennepin County. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. Schoenzeit asked if a 7.5 foot side yard setback is now what is allowed. Landgraver indicated it is along with the 20 percent structural coverage. Thiesse noted the driveway is responsible for the hardcover overage. Thiesse stated when he drove in the driveway and turned around so he could drive out forward, the turnaround room was necessary since it would be dangerous to back out onto Shadywood. Thiesse stated it would be difficult to eliminate the 900 square feet of excess hardcover from the driveway and that the driveway might as well be a size that is workable. Lemke noted overall hardcover on the property is being reduced. Schwingler stated the applicants have also addressed the drainage. Landgraver commented the Planning Commission knew people would be encouraged to maximize the housing space and then come back for a hardcover variance when the City approved the 7.5 side setback and the 20 percent structural coverage limit. Thiesse noted the hardcover is being reduced in this case. Landgraver stated one of the positives with the proposal is that the applicants are reducing the hardcover on the lot. Landgraver agreed that Shadywood Road is dangerous to back out on and that the turnaround space is necessary. Lemke moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3978, Alexander Design Group on behalf of Travis Hansberger, 1720 Shadywood Road, granting of a rear setback variance, a hardcover variance, and lot area and lot width variances. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Council Exhibit D #17-3978 Date Application Received: 9.20.17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 9.25.17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 11.25.17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Reif, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: October 16, 2017 Subject: 17-3978, Alexander Design Group o/b/o Travis Hansberger, 1720 Shadywood Rd, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear setback of 24.8 feet, hardcover of 33.98%; lot area, and lot width variances in order to build a new single family home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is proposing to demo the existing home and construct a new single family house. The home was design the meet the structural coverage of the lot at 20% but is requesting a hardcover variance to allow for adequate driveway space and a patio. The existing lot has 35.74% hardcover and the new proposed home would have 33.98% hardcover. They are requesting a rear yard setback for the principle structure of 24.8 feet where 30 feet in required; lot area and lot width variances are required. The existing home is nonconforming to 75' lakeyard setback and the average lakeshore setback, the applicant designed the home to meet these city standards which pushed the home further to the rear of the lot. The applicant is proposing to move the driveway access along Shadywood Road. This is a county road and would require approval through Hennepin County. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 - Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1C Required Proposed Front 30 78' Rear 30 24.8 Side- North 7.5 7.6 Side- South 7.5 7.5 Lakeshore 75' 75' Average Lakeshore This is being met. Section 78-350 - Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1C Lot Area Lot Width Required I 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 1 100' FILE # 17-3978 10/16/17 Page 2 of 5 Actual 12,649 s.f. (0.29 acre) 72' @ 75' 72'@ OHWL Section 78-1403- Structural Cover Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 12,649 s.f. (0.29 acre) Allowed: 2,530 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,530 s.f. (20%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Proposed Overlay Existing Hardcover in Zone Hardcover Hardcover District Tier 3,162 s.f. 4,521 s.f. Roughly 990 4298s.f. Tier 1 12,649 s.f. (25 %) (35.74%) s.f. w/in 75' (33.98%) Applicable Regulations: This lot takes advantage of recent modifications to the city code intended to ease the development and redevelopment process, including reducing the number of variances. These modifications included reducing the side yard setback for non -conforming lots, and raising the structural coverage limit to 20% from the previous 15% of lot area. During the discussion of raising the structural coverage to 20%, there was concern that this would trigger increased requests for hardcover. While the correlation between structural and hardcover limits is not necessarily linear, there does seem to be an opportunity to reduce the amount of hardcover to fall within prescribed limits. Rear Setback (78-350) The applicant is proposing the place the principle structure 24.8 feet from the rear property line where 30 feet is required. Currently the existing garage is placed 2 feet from the rear property line and the home is placed 52 feet from the rear property line. The applicant oriented the home to meet the lake yard setbacks which are at a curve due to the nature of the lakeshore and caused the structure to be moved closer to the rear/street side of the property. Hardcover (78-1700) The applicant is proposing a new home that would exceed the 25% hardcover to 33.98% hardcover. Currently the property has 35.74% hardcover, the applicant is proposing to reduce that amount with the new home and driveway. They are proposing to meet the required 20% structural coverage. The applicant states that the driveway was designed for the safety of the homeowner for entering and exiting the property. There is a need for the driveway to have a turnaround point for vehicles in order to ensure there are clear sight lines and a safe entrance and exit to the home due to the amount of traffic on Shadywood Road and the small nature of this lot. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the proposed driveway meets the minimum requirements for safety. Lot Width and Lot Area (78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard FILE # 17-3978 10/16/17 Page 3 of 5 properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicants' need for setback and hardcover variances results in the property's inability to conform to #1 and #3 above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are also required in order to redevelop the property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear yard variance request is reasonable considering the shape and buildable area of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner by replacing the existing residence with a new home which has less hardcover then existing and the new garage will be moved inward on the lot compared to existing placement of the garage; but the size and width of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. FILE # 17-3978 10/16/17 Page 4 of 5 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and shape, and its proximity to the lake. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the surrounding homes. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The shape and size of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of the lake and Shadywood Road create a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The shape and size of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of Shadywood Road and the lakeshore creates a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this condition to be true. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 11. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The size and shape of the Property; its position along Shadywood Road and the lakeshore, limits the access and safety for the homeowners; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status FILE # 17-3978 10/16/17 Page 5 of 5 The property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties, Analysis Staff finds that there is practical difficulties inherent to the rear setback, lot width and lot. This is due to the size and shape of the lot as well as the orientation of the lot to the lake and the county road could result on safety concerns, these factors support granting the variances would be reasonable. The Planning Commission should discuss the hardcover request as it pertaining to safety and access. Engineer Comments Commissioners should questions how the how the applicant is going to achieve the propose layout without pushing runoff onto the neighboring properties. It appears the grade is being raised all around the proposed home with little to no room on the sides of the home for drainage features. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. How will you achieve the proposed layout with pushing runoff onto the neighboring properties? 2. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances if the Planning Commission finds the practical difficulties reasonable. A recommendation for approval should be contingent upon the applicant receiving approval from Hennepin County for moving the driveway access on a county road. If not approved this could change the shape of the driveway altering the hardcover of the site. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. City Engineer Memo Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 16 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3984 — City of Orono Text Amendment: Rental Licensing, Vacation Rental Prohibition Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Public Hearing Development Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gather public comment from residents relative to possible changes to the City Code that would require licensing for rental properties, and to require a minimum 30 day rental term. 2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable 3. Background/ Summary. At its meeting on October 9th, 2017, the council directed staff to move forward on developing an ordinance to regulate short term rentals, and to also review potential to develop an ordinance that would require rental licensing. The Council agreed that a listening session should occur prior to adopting a final version of any regulations. There are two main questions to be addressed as understood by staff. Question 1: Should the city require licenses or similar city oversight in the rental of residential units? The Met Council estimates there are approximately 400 rental properties in Orono (15% of all households). Typically, a rental licensing program is established to address concerns with overcrowding or substandard housing, and a licensing program requires inspections periodically, ranging from every year to every 5 years. Staff is unaware of a life safety concern relative to overcrowding or substandard housing. Question 2. Should the City regulate short term rentals, i.e. rentals for a period of time less than 30 days? The Council has a number of options in which to proceed: a. Prohibit short term rentals, as Greenwood and Shorewood and other cities have done. b. Require City Council approval of short term rentals, or they can have a tiered approval system as Prior Lake and Stillwater have done. c. Require some documentation, a permit or license that facilitates rapid response to complaints, as was proposed in 2015 as Plymouth does. d. Do nothing, determining that current regulations adequately address noise, traffic, and parking, as Minnetonka does. 4. Public Comment. Postcards were mailed to 16 property owners notifying them of the meeting, inviting comment. Do date, staff has received comment from two property owners; this email correspondence is attached. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends receiving feedback, and directing staff to address specific concerns in an ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Receive public comment, and direct, by motion, staff to amend city code as appropriate. Exhibits Exhibit A. Public comment received Exhibit B. Mailing list Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Exhibit C. City Council minutes 10-9-17 Exhibit D. Shorewood Ordinance Exhibit E. Stillwater Ordinance Exhibit F. Prior Lake License Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV Council Exhibit A 17-3984 From: Rick Carter To: Jeremy Barnhart; Victoria Seals; Denny Walsh Cc: Jeanne Carter Subject: AirBnB/Short Term rental policy Date: Thursday, November 02, 2017 9:47:11 AM Hi, Jeremy (Victoria and Denny). You may remember me from the Park Commission and/or the Big Island Committee. My wife and I just received the letter regarding the short term rental policy discussion. As the letter noted, last year the city planning commission went through a similar process and proposed a policy to the city council. Jeanne and I went to the meeting when the council met to take up the issue. The issue came up quite late and by then there were only three folks in the audience, Jeanne myself and a gentleman from an Orono Condominium Association. The gentleman was interested in seeing the city institute a policy prohibiting rentals for periods of less than 30 days. When it became clear to the council that the condo association could control the uses in their own buildings and began to understand what AirBnB was from Jeanne and myself, they decided to not pursue the policy any further. When we have guests, it is typically one person or a couple, with one car staying with us in our house for a couple of days. They also patronize (at our suggestion) the local businesses, eating and drinking establishments. Most of our neighbors have more noise, parking, traffic and trash generated by service providers in a given week than our guests. We have included the letter we sent to the council prior to their meeting below. We will certainly come to the November 13, 2017 meeting, but we are wondering if we could hear more about the complaints that have been received. Thanks for listening. Rick and Jeanne Carter 2780 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55331 Cell 612.385.5182 E-mail sent to you and the council on Friday, April 8, 2016 1 am following Orono's proposal to consider an ordinance on short term (vacation )rentals with great interest, and I would like to offer you my perspective on the issue. After running the Birdhouse Bed & Breakfast Inn for two years in Excelsior, my wife Jeanne and I purchased a home on the lake in Orono. Jeanne decided to list our home on AirBnB as a result of her experiences hosting at the Inn, and using AirBnB herself as a guest in other locations, which she found to be quite enjoyable, safe and convenient. There are currently no traditional lodging options available on Lake Minnetonka, but the demand is there. We see AirBnB and VRBO as an opportunity to welcome visitors to our home and share all the great things that the Lake Minnetonka area has to offer. Typically we host folks who are in town for family events such as weddings, funerals, reunions and business trips. We prefer their stays to be less than 4 days, as we want guests; not roommates or tenants. Our guest limit is four adults, and they have the use of our lower level. While our guests are here, they are out in the community spending money at local restaurants, shopping with local retailers, and visiting places like the Arboretum, theaters, Gale Woods Farm, etc. We are owner -occupied and always available either in-person, or by phone or text, to our guests during their stay. Once or twice a year we rent out the entire home for events, such as the upcoming Ryder Cup. We use an owner's representative during these times who is responsible for managing our property and responding to any questions or issues that may arise. Jeanne went to the listening session that the Planning Commission held in February. At that time three possible options were presented, however none of these included a seven or 30 day minimum stay, which we were surprised to see currently being considered. This is absolutely the wrong thing to do. It is literally the opposite of short-term vacation rental, turning visitors into tenants, thus promoting the use of more properties not occupied or managed by the owner. The VRBO and AirBnB owners that Jeanne met at the meeting all felt strongly that they take pride in their properties, want to maintain good neighbor relations, and monitor their guests closely, through in-person communication, written policies and house rules that are tailored to their properties and enforced. We personally are not opposed to an ordinance or reasonable licensure requirements, although some hosts are concerned that the possible fees associated with licensure might be a barrier, as nobody is getting rich doing this. Jeanne and I would be happy to work with staff, educate, speak or do whatever makes sense to help develop a reasonable policy that balances the needs of all community members in Orono, while also contributing to a welcoming atmosphere for visitors to the Lake Minnetonka area. Eliminating the typical short -stay (2-7 days) of most AirBnB experiences in our community through this course of action would be an unfortunate decision, impacting everyone's pocket -books, including local business owners and the city. Thanks. Rick. From: Ben Kieffer To: Jeremy Barnhart Cc: John Kieffer Subject: Rental Restriction comments Date: Monday, November 06, 2017 12:50:57 PM Hello Jeremy, Thank you for including me in the commentary for the proposed rental restriction. We will be on vacation during the council meeting on November 13th, or we would attend. Please use my comments during the discussion as I feel they are valuable. I would like to start out explaining that I own and operate a property management company in the Twin Cities, specifically dealing with townhome and condominium association management. I fell this gives me lots of background on this subject as each community we manage has their own governing documents and board of directors, similar to any city. We have been discussing this item in depth as the Super Bowl is among us. Most HOA's ban 'transient hotel usage' which would be considered any tenant that is not staying longer than the lease term set by the association. (3 months to 1 year for most HOA's). I personally feel that adding this restriction is removing a right we had as a homeowner when we purchased the home. While I understand that laws may be implemented at any time, this is one which affects my rights as a homeowner. Instead of fully banning the short term leasing, why not put restrictions on it? In some of the HOA's we manage, we have put harsh rental restrictions on the owners for not following guidelines, which can then be passed on to the renters. For instance, one community we manage has a $1,000 fine without warning for any unit which does not abide by the guidelines set by the rules and regulations. It is mandatory that the renters sign off on this, and pay a deposit up to this amount to the landlord in case of any mishaps. Similar to a rental license in other cities, Orono could implement a license with stipulations. The license could be pulled if any of the stipulations are broken, and/or a fine could be assessed. After hearing of the nuisances of the subject property, it seems that the owner of that property is not taking responsibility of the tenants, and the owner should most definitely be held liable for the inappropriate behavior which is occurring there; but should not punish the rest of the community for their actions. As a homeowner who is looking into using their primary residence to rent out a handful of times per year on a site such as AirBnB.com, it is in my best interest to make sure that the current tenants are using the property in the correct manner. How is this going to be policed if a full restriction in place? I also use my property to hold several events throughout the year with family and friends, some of which do not involve me being present at the function. What will the complaint/investigation look like? What will stop homeowners from renting to someone for 30 days, but having a backdoor agreement to only staying for 3? What currently happens to homeowners which hold parties similar to the subject property? are they penalized in some way through city law? I have an acquaintance who rented a property thought the summer on Lake Minnetonka (not in Orono) a few years back, and the tenants had similar functions to the subject property. They would have been within the rights to hold a lease more than 30 days. In closing I feel that this is taking away a right to someone who purchased the property. There could even be a grandfathered clause where current owners are allowed to rent short term, but not new owners after a certain date. I would also like to mention the semi -proposed long term rental regulations as well. We also own a townhome in Orono, which we have rented out for the past 5 years. I have had 2 sets of wonderful tenants which have not caused any issues to the community. Both tenants have treated the home as their own. As the owner, it is in my best interest to find tenants which till treat the property well. I had extensive background checks completed and followed up with references. I do understand the need for licensing, but at some point a 'required rental inspection' may be too much. I understand the city making sure they have the information of the tenants on file, but I do not think an inspection is needed. Also, please take into account a nominal fee for a license. Homeowners are much more likely to abide by the license requirements if the fee is nominal. New Hope has an outrageous fee and makes it nearly impossible to rent the property, which in turn creates situations where the landlords may enter into contract for deeds, or other ways around to show new ownership. I would be interested in being included in the discussion for this item. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Respectful yours, Ben Kieffer & John Kieffer 2024 Shadywood Road 3741 Livingston Court Ben Kieffer Owner & Association Manager ®❑ Compass Management Group, Inc. 'A Trusted Guide" 415 Indian Mound St E, Suite 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 P: 612.888.4705 E: ben&compassmanagement.com W: www.compassmana,gement.com Council Exhibit B 17-3984 3635 Northshore Drive 1985 Fagerness 1925 Concordia Street 1082 Loma Linda Ave 2773 Casco Point Road 2795 Shadywood Rd 2785 Shadywood Rd 1404 Balder Park Road 4400 Deering Island 120 Big Island 1973 Fagerness Point Road 940 North Arm 2024 Shadywood 540 North Arm 2780 Shadywood Katherine S Kitt Matthew and Alissa Briggs Thomas M Konat Julie Toman Reed Larson Brad NayFack CKONE LLC Benjamin Milbrath Donald Driggs Jody Laughlin Jeffrey Martha Pattison Roman Olshansky Ben Keifer Connie Piepho Richard or Jeanne Carter 5590 Woodside LA 1411 School House Road 22275 Bracketts Rd 1082 Loma Linda Ave 2773 Casco Point Rd 2795 Shadywood Rd 161 Primrose LA PO Box 423 2925 Casco Point Rd 5665 Howards Pt Rd 1973 Fagerness Point Rd 940 North Arm 2024 Shadywood 540 North Arm 2780 Shadywood Excelsior VBRO 475753 Santa Barbara VBRO 367863 Excelsior VBRO 420159 Mound VRBO 460106 Wayzata VRBO 511816 Excelsior VRBO 591313 Medina VRBO 252726 Spokane VRBO 742223 Wayzata Excelsior VRBO 137071 Wayzata VRBO 211229 Orono VRBO 1003725 Orono VRBO 1163775 Orono VRBO 1112381 Excelsior AirBnB 3 nights 1 week 5 nights 2 night 2 nights 1-3 3 nights None 4 nights not available superbowl In house rooms MINUTES OF THE Council Exhibit C ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING 17-3984 Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. AUTHORIZATION TO REVIEW POSSIBLE ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SHORT- TERM RENTALS Barnhart reviewed his Staff report dated October 9, 2017, regarding a possible City Code amendment to regulate short-term rentals. Barnhart stated the issue is more and more properties are renting or leasing their property to vacation renters. Many times those rentals have impacted the neighbors. Staff does not support an ordinance amendment since adding a regulation either outright prohibiting and/or severely restricting the short-term rental of a property owner's home impacts their property rights and punishes the property owners and renters that are respectful of the rules and would only add redundant regulation to city ordinances. Currently the City has rules and ordinances that regulate various nuisances and crimes. Crosby asked what some of the neighboring cities are doing. Barnhart indicated there is a mix, with a number of cities regulating rental housing, with short-term rentals being a component of that, and some cities just regulating short-term rentals. The City of Shoreview prohibits short-term rentals. Dankey asked if any of the cities have said that something in particular has worked for them. Barnhart stated the question comes down to how many resources Orono can put on enforcing an ordinance. Barnhart stated the City of Plymouth regulates short-term rentals but they have much more resources to conduct frequent inspections and then other cities do an inspection once every three to five years. In 2015, Staff proposed requiring a license that was intended to identify an onsite manager that could be contacted with any complaints. Walsh noted originally when the Council discussed this, one issue was having someone that could be contacted in the event of an issue. Walsh stated a new issue is how the City protects itself against sex offenders coming in on a short-term rental as well as the number of people in the rental house. Barnhart stated if the City requires a license, someone would need to be in charge of the rental, but that he is not sure how the City could regulate the number of people in the house. Barnhart stated from a building code perspective, there is a capacity question on a home, but that he does not know how the City would be able to track that outside of responding to complaints. Currently the City has regulations addressing parking, traffic, and noise. Dankey asked if it is possible to restrict the number of people through the licensing process. Barnhart stated there is probably a way to limit it and that Staff can take a look at that. Seals stated she used to own rental properties in Duluth and that they would require a license. Seals stated if she had so many complaints against the property, she was at risk of losing her license and that she made sure she had rules in place. Seals stated in her view this conversation is about people being good citizens. Mattick stated with the advent of AirBnb, short-term rentals have become more popular and that the question is whether the Council is looking to distinguish short-term rentals from other rentals. Mattick Page 1 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. stated what would help the most is to identify the problem the City is trying to solve, such as noise or parking. Police Chief Farniok stated as it relates to sex offenders, the police department monitors them when they move here and use a permanent address. Farniok noted there is no way the police department could ever address the situation such as the one that occurred in Minnetonka, especially if they do not yet have that sex offender designation. Farniok stated the police department has not seen huge issues with the short-term rentals and that they currently have regulations to address situations with noise, parking, etc. Farniok stated he does not know if those issues pertain to just regular homeowners or rentals. Farniok stated the City can probably expect to see an increase in complaints with the Super Bowl. Printup stated in his view the upcoming Super Bowl is why it is important to have something in Orono's tool box to deal with the short-term rentals. Printup stated the City Council also needs to think about the stranger component with the short-term rentals and that there is the potential of different people coming in every weekend. Printup stated the City would be able to go after the property owner if they have something on the books and that in his view short-term rentals should only occur at a homesteaded property rather than a non -homesteaded property. Farniok noted if there is a violation relating to current code, the police department can enforce that now and that they will continue to address situations as they arise. Dankey asked if a week-long rental would be more beneficial than a weekend rental. Dankey stated in her view a family would be more likely to rent for a week and that a bachelor party would likely be just over the weekend. Farniok stated he does not see a difference since it depends on what the property is and how it is being used. Walsh stated summertime is probably when the most abuse happens and that the City needs something in the tool box to address issues. Walsh stated the homestead versus non -homesteaded is something to consider and that longer term rentals tend to provide more stability than a weekend rental. Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on this item. Bill Wolfson, 3399 Crystal Bay Road, stated he did live next to a VRBO that was owned by Matt Johnson and that he never had any issues. Wolfson indicated he also has a VRBO and that the burden is on him to prequalify the people to make sure they are good renters. In addition, the city requires him to have a license and that the house has the typical safety features like smoke detectors. Wolfson stated that system works well. The online systems also allow the property owners to rate people so the renters know they have accountability or a track record. Wolfson noted someone could have a bad long-term renter and that the property owner has less recourse against them. Wolfson stated the price point in Orono defends a little bit against a bad renter. Wolfson stated the City currently has regulations here against noise and parking and that further regulations reducing private property rights is a concern for him. Wolfson stated whenever the City starts to regulate something new, everyone does a mad dash to say they are existing or to get a license. Page 2 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. Walsh stated the question is whether the property owner's rights outweigh the neighbors' property rights. Wolfson commented he is not sure whether there is any hard data that Orono is experiencing any issues. Dankey stated she is in agreement with the property rights and that in her view a license works. Wolfson stated he also pays a fee every time he rents the property out to help offset the City's enforcement costs. Printup stated the price point could also mean that more people share in the rental fee. Kristi Anderson, 1408 Baldur Park Road, noted she did send an e-mail to each of the Council Members yesterday enumerating the reasons why they have been experiencing issues. Anderson stated the Minnesota Short-term Rental Agreement references Shorewood and the fact that they do not have the resources to possibly enforce a lot of issues, which is why they chose to prohibit them. The City of Savage banned rental of homes for shorter than 15 days because they felt it rose to the level of a business. Anderson stated the question is whether the right of someone to rent their property rises to the level of a business, and if the City Council is looking at creating a resort atmosphere similar to Stillwater, even they have put other restrictions on it, such as limiting the number of rentals and limiting the number of bedrooms that can be rented out. Stillwater has also adopted a policy of three strikes and you are out. Anderson stated there are a lot of tools and resources out there that can be implemented and that she is hoping Orono will have this conversation because as a resident she feels the use has intensified over the past few years. Anderson stated they have major safety concerns with short-term rentals because they now have strangers that are renting next door. The house is on a 50 -foot lot and the online advertising for the house states that it accommodates 12 to 15, which turns into a party. Anderson indicated she has a daughter who does not want to step outside because she gets heckled and is subject to lewd comments if she has a swimming suit on. Anderson commented it is appalling to her that every time she steps outside she has to see if there is a dog out there that might attack or whether someone else is out there. Anderson stated she is not quite sure that this is something the Council has given much thought to. Anderson questioned why the City is protecting the renters as opposed to all the neighbors who are paying their taxes and are homesteaded and want to protect the character of their neighborhood. Anderson stated her neighborhood consists of 50 -foot lots and the residents are very close to each other. Every weekend there is a different party that brings in anywhere from 12 to 28 cars. Baldur Park Point is a small, narrow street, and if there are 28 cars there for a party at a rental house, it deters everyone from enjoying their leisure time. Anderson stated the City Council should consider whether short-term rentals belong on a small lot like hers. Anderson noted the City of Prior Lake used a sliding scale to limit the number of people and to allow something more reasonable. If the house has four bedrooms, maybe eight people are allowed. Anderson stated there have also been weddings at the neighboring house and that they asked if they could hang lights from their trees. Anderson stated they are used to being very neighborly but that this has stifled all that. Page 3 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. Anderson stated she also works every day and that at midnight, when the renters are outside still partying, she will ask them to be quiet but then the voices rise again. Anderson stated the neighbor suggested they close their windows, which they have done, but that they can still hear the activity and partying going on even with the windows shut. Anderson stated two weeks ago there was a bachelor party and at 3 a.m. the guys ran out in the yard to go skinny dipping in the lake. Anderson commented she does not want to have to call the police every time something happens but that she will do that if that is what it takes. In addition, the renters will leave the trash out for several days, the trash ends up getting knocked over, and the neighbors have to pick up what is blowing around. Anderson stated the neighbors should not have to be encumbered with this. In addition, because they are having a number of people on a small lot, they are overflowing onto the neighbor's lot. Last weekend someone was trying to up someone else with their sexual escapades. Anderson stated she overhears that as well as her kids and that the people do not belong there and that it is not right for this zone or area. Anderson stated this is a good time to discuss this since the Super Bowl is coming up. Anderson stated she does not want Orono to become a pocket resort area and that she would also oppose hotel licenses going out. Anderson stated if they go by the MN Department of Health guidelines, short-term rentals have risen to the level of a hotel, and as such, regulations relating to fire code, disabilities, and other things should go along with it but it is doubtful the City wants to get into managing those things. Walsh commented his neighborhood has had longer-term renters over the years and just having a renter changes the character of the neighborhood because they care differently about the neighborhood. Walsh stated the City Council wants to tread lightly but tread well because it is important to protect the community as a whole versus the individual homeowner. Steve Elliott, 1400 Baldur Park Road, stated he moved into this neighborhood about five years ago because it was a very family oriented neighborhood and is on a dead-end road. Elliott stated he likes to spend a lot of time in the back yard or on the dock but that in the last year or two that has completely changed because of the next door property and the short-term renters that are in there. Elliott stated they can get to know the people that are there a longer period of time but that it is mainly bachelor and bachelorette parties. Elliott stated he can no longer be outside anymore on the weekends with his daughter because by noon a couple of the people will be drunk and they will be wrestling, fighting, and swearing. Elliott stated he is uncomfortable being out there, and by 3:00 or 4:00 in the afternoon, his children cannot be out there given the vulgar language. Later in the evening is when the strippers show up, which is not what should be happening in Orono. Elliott stated what also goes with that are the drugs. Elliott stated probably four or five weeks ago he was sitting in his kitchen and there were two young gentlemen knocking at his glass door. Elliott stated he stepped outside to talk with them and they said they are trying to buy drugs. Elliott stated that is the kind of stuff that you get when the City doesn't have regulations and you have two or three day rentals. Elliott noted the issue with garbage was mentioned and that he typically spends a couple days a week picking up trash. Elliott stated he also has to repair the ruts in his yard on a weekly basis from cars parking on his yard. Elliott noted the property owner lives in Washington State and would not be available if there is a problem. Elliott indicated he does text him to try to let him know what is going on Page 4 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. but that he says they should close the windows or just not go out there. Elliott stated it is not fair that he is not able to use his property. Elliott stated last summer there were renters that were hosting the wedding that Ms. Anderson referenced and they had two huge Rottweilers that were not on leases. Elliott indicated he was going to have surgery that afternoon and one of the dogs charged him and knocked him down. Elliott stated he thought he was going to get mauled. The next day there were two dogs there that did the same thing to his 12 -year-old and knocked him down right in the middle of their property. Elliott stated the noise is just nonstop throughout the day and that they can't get away from it. Elliott stated the language and stories go way too far and that there are also parking issues. Elliott stated the renters take a lot of liberties and just park wherever. A couple of times there were boat trailers parked in his driveway and that the renters are constantly trespassing. Elliott commented that would not be a problem if the neighbors are coming in your yard or it's the neighbors' kids and you know them, but it is an issue because these are strangers. Elliott stated generally they are 30 some year old men that are intoxicated and playing drinking games. Elliott stated it has gotten to a point where he would consider it out of control and that it has definitely impacted his life. Elliott encouraged the City Council to consider some tight regulations or requiring a longer rental period. Matt Johnson, 1432 Shoreline Drive, stated he did own an VRBO next to Bill Wolfson and that when he learned that several neighbors made complaints about the property to the City, he told the neighbors what he was doing and gave them his number. Johnson stated some of the neighbors were really concerned about not knowing the people in there, which he understands, but at the same time he travels and uses VRBO all the time. Johnson stated he just bought a place in Florida and that that market has a lot of VRBO and that it is a great service. Johnson stated he does not care what the City decides, but that the people who are doing it well have repeat customers. Johnson stated it is way more cost effective for the landlord to have longer-term rentals. Johnson indicated he also had limitations on the number of cars that could be at his VRBO and that he tried to make it clear it is a residential neighborhood. Johnson commented there are people who are doing it well and effectively and that they have people booked out for a year in advance. Johnson stated if the City decides to adopt something, they should give people some time to get their bookings and that it is something for the Council to think about. Johnson stated he supports accountability of the landlords whether it is short-term or long-term rental. Johnson commented the Baldur Park rental seems like one terrible situation for sure that needs some law enforcement involvement because it sounds like there are plenty of violations that are occurring there regularly but that he does not want to punish everyone because of a couple specific problems. Printup stated while it might be a great service, the question is whether Orono wants to do this. Johnson noted there are not a bunch of hotel options in this area. Crosby noted most places in Florida are for 30 days and they are longer term Dankey stated her rental in Florida is usually one week. Page 5 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. Johnson stated it sounds like the Baldur Park property owner does not care about the neighbors and that in his view some pressure should be put on him. Johnson stated even if the City puts a 30 -day rental period in their regulations, the owner will put a clause in there that if the renters leave early, they will be refunded the difference, which is how they get around the longer rental period. Johnson questioned how the City would be able to get involved with contracts like that. Bill Anderson, 1408 Baldur Park Road, noted an hour ago they heard about how far ten yards is and then watching the person step it off. Anderson stated they are literally about five yards from the other yard. Anderson stated if it was a 100 -foot lot, he can see where it might not be that big of an issue, but that small lots do not warrant having 10 to 15 to 20 people there at one time because it really is a party. Anderson noted the City Council seen a picture of their street and the parked cars. Anderson stated he has backed into two cars already and that parking is an issue. Anderson noted the City Council has mentioned the property owner's rights, but that it all goes back to the other 20 homes that people live in day in and day out and that it is not just about the guy who lives in Seattle. Dankey asked if a three strike rule would work in the case of his neighborhood or licensing. Anderson stated licensing should be mandatory but that he would like to see it prohibited in some manner. Anderson noted a lot of the rental places in Florida are townhomes or condos and that it is a very transient type of environment. Anderson stated Baldur Park Road is not transient and neither is 99 percent of Orono. Anderson stated it is a business next door and that it is a money maker for the property owner. Anderson commented they have all heard the term NIMBY, or not in my back yard, but that he would guarantee that anyone else who had these kinds of crowds in their back yards would be here, too. Anderson stated he has a problem with calling the police on every little issue and wasting resources, but that it will get to the point where the police department will be called on a regular basis. Anderson recommended making the lot size a requisite as well as limiting the number of cars and people in the home. Printup stated he concurs that Orono is not transient, which basically sums up the situation. Printup stated he would not want to live somewhere if there are strangers coming and going every weekend. Richie Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road, commented this thing can be debated over and over again, but the horror story would be if one of the guys who is hooting and hollering at their daughter would instead try to solicit her or worst. Anderson stated when a sexual predator comes and lives in the community, the police department knows that, but if someone rents a house for a day or a weekend, the police have no clue. Anderson stated the City Council should also not assume that the police department or the City has the manpower to deal with this. Anderson stated in his view the City should adopt Shorewood's game plan and say if you cannot afford your house on the lake, you should not have bought the property. Anderson encouraged the City Council to be proactive on this because having someone raped in Orono due to a rental would be a life-long issue for that person. Anderson asked who the City Council is trying to appease, the five percent of the residents who want rentals in Orono or the 95 percent who do not. Page 6 of 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 9, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. Crosby stated he has heard some great points tonight and that he would concur that Orono is not a transient community. Crosby stated he would recommend the renters be given until January of 2018 as a drop -dead date and that there should be no short-term rentals in Orono that are less than 30 days. Seals stated the City should also look at long-term rentals and that this should be a two-pronged approach. Seals stated in her view placing restrictions on short-term rentals are not limiting property rights at all since they can still rent it out but that she would not want someone living next to her for a week that she doesn't know. Seals stated if someone wants to rent their house long term, they should need a license, have their house inspected, and background checks conducted. Walsh stated whoever is renting, the cars have to fit in the driveway. Printup stated he also is in agreement on the long-term rentals and no short-term rentals. Walsh stated there should also be language stating that no terminations less than 30 days will be allowed. Crosby stated the City needs to send a message that there will be no short-term rentals in Orono. Barnhart recommended the City Council hold some sort of public hearing or listening session before adopting a final version of the ordinance. Barnhart indicated he is not sure at this point where the ordinance would fit, but if it is a zoning ordinance, that would require a hearing before the Planning Commission. Walsh stated he would like to get the process moving forward and that he would like it to be a two- pronged approached. Walsh stated it also needs to be determined whether the City has the appropriate manpower to deal with short-term and/or long-term rentals. Dankey stated she is not in total agreement with the Council and that in her view a one week rental is very different than a one or two night rental. Walsh stated he likes tagging onto Shorewood's regulations. Seals noted Greenwood also prohibits anything less than 30 days. Crosby stated if someone is paying for a week but only want to be there for a day or two, the rent can be adjusted, and that he would like to follow Shorewood's and Greenwood's lead in prohibiting short-term rentals. Crosby indicated he is in agreement with reviewing the longer-term rentals as well. Page 7 of 7 Council Exhibit D 17-3984 CITY OF SHOREWOOD AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SHOREWOOD RENTAL HOUSING CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO SHORT-TERM RENTAL OF PROPERTY Section 1. RECITALS (a) The potential exists for short-term rentals to become a significantbusiness operation in Minnesota. (b) Short-term rental of property in Shorewood's residential zoning districts has resulted in complaints from residents living near such rental properties. Section 2. FINDINGS (a) Many short-term rental properties may fall under the jurisdiction of state law (those that qualify as hotels, motels, or lodging establishments) . The level of state licensing compliance may inevitably be low due to: (1) The amount of manpower required for monitoring and enforcement. (2) The fact that new short-term rentals constantly enter the market. (3) Those offering accommodations not in compliance may be notifiedand then take steps to avoid further detection from licensing authorities. (4) These same issues apply to cities trying to regulate short-term rentals (b) Rental of private homes for temporary occupancy is contrary to the essential character and stability of residential neighborhoods because short-term tenants have little interest in the welfare of the local community, do not engage in activities that strengthen residential neighborhoods, and do not integrate into residential neighborhoods. (c) Rental of homes for temporary occupancy disturbs residential neighborhoods by creating excessive noise, accumulation of refuse, trespassing, disorderly conduct, vandalism, high occupant turnover, excessive traffic, and excessive numbers of parked motor vehicles. (d) Regulating rental of private homes for temporary occupancy is necessary to protect the essential character of residential neighborhoods and the health, safety and general welfare of the community. (e) Rental of residential homes for temporary occupancy is often undertaken without adequate on-site management, compliance with state and local codes for commercial lodging establishments, and other safeguards for those renting the home. (fl Operating a commercial business venture in close proximity to neighboring residences can lead to conflict and undermines the fundamental principles of zoning. (g) Short-term rentals render a significant number of housing units unavailable for long' -term residents and raise the cost of housing. (h) Short-term rentals have the potential to diminish property values. Section 3. City Code Section 1004.02 is hereby amended to add the following defintions: (a) "DWELLING UNIT. A residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one family, but not including hotels, motels, lodging establishments, nursing homes, boarding or rooming houses or recreational vehicles." (b) "OPERATOR. The person or enterprise or its agent who is owner or proprietor of a rental dwelling or rental dwelling unit, whether in the capacity of owner, lessor, lessee, sublessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee, or any other capacity. Where the operator performs their functions through a rental agent, the managing agency or the rental agent has the same duties as the principal." (c) "REMUNERATION. Compensation, money, or other consideration given in return for occupancy, possession, or use of real property." (d) "RENT. The consideration or remuneration charged whether or not received, for the occupancy or use of another's property as a rental dwelling or rental dwelling unit, valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, labor, or otherwise, including all receipts, cash, credits, property, or services of any kind. Rent may include consideration or remuneration received pursuant to an option to purchase whereby a person is given the right to possess the property for a term of less than thirty (30) days." (e) "SHORT-TERM RENTAL UNIT. Any structure, any portion of any structure, rental dwelling or rental dwelling unit that is rented to a transient for less than thirty (30) consecutive days in a residential district or residential planned unit development district." (f) "TRANSIENT. Any person who, at their own expense or at the expense of another, exercises occupancy or possession, or is entitled to occupancy or possession, by reason of any rental agreement, concession, permit, right of access, option to purchase, license, time sharing arrangement, or any other type of agreement for a period ofless than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days." Section 4. City Code Section 1004.06 is hereby amended to read: "1004.06 SHORT-TERM RENTAL PROHIBITED. Subd. 1. Purpose. The City finds that short-term rentals located in residential zoning districts constitute commercial use of residential property, conflict with the residential character of residential zoning districts, disrupt the residential character of neighborhoods, and have a negative impact on the livability of residential neighborhoods. The City has received complaints from residents regarding short-term rentals, including complaints related to noise, over - occupancy, and illegal parking. Studies have reported that short-term rentals can render a significant number of housing units unavailable for long-term residents and can raise the cost of housing. To ensure adequate housing options for residents, preserve the residential character of the City's residential districts, preserve property values, and reduce land use conflicts, IPA the City determines, in furtherance of the public health, safety and general welfare, it is necessary to limit short-term rentals to hotels, motels, lodging establishments and similar accommodations which are appropriately zoned and have the appropriate infrastructure and services for short-term use. Subd. 2. Prohibition. Short-term rental of any dwelling or dwelling unit to a transient for less than thirty (30) consecutive days in a residential zoning district is prohibited. State licensed hotels, motels and lodging establishments located outside residential districts or residential planned unit development districts are allowed, pursuant to applicable City codes. Subd. 3. Enforcement. An owner, operator, tenant or occupant of any building or property in violation of the provisions of this section may be charged and found guilty of a misdemeanor and may be held responsible for the cost of enforcement in addition topenalties. The City may exercise any and all remedies at law or in equity to ensure compliance with this section. All unpaid costs, charges and penalties may be certified as a special assessment levy against the property." Section 5. Previous City Code Section 1004.06 (Administration and Enforcements) is renumbered as Section 1004.07. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD this 26th day of September, 2016. ATTEST: JD -3- CITY OF STILLWATER ORDINANCE NO. 1093 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR SHORT TERM HOME RENTALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Definitions Amend City Code Chapter 31, Section 31-101 Definitions, by adding the following: 119.1. Primary Residence, means the dwelling unit within which a person lives for six months plus a during a calendar year. 119.2. Primary Resident, means a person living on a property where the property is the person's prim residence. day ary 145.1. Short Term Home Rental, Type A (hosted short term rental), means a dwelling unit that is offered to transient guests for a period of less than 30 consecutive days, where a primary resident of the property is present while the transient guests are present. 145.2. Short Term Home Rental, Type B (unhosted short term rental), means a dwelling unit that is offered to transient guests for a period of less than 30 consecutive days, where the property serves as a person's primary residence but a primary resident of the property is not present while the transient guests are present. This Type B also includes Short Term Home Rental of any Accessory Dwelling Units, non -owner occupied Duplexes or "mother-in-law" apartments. 145.3. Short Term Home Rental, Type C (dedicated short term rental) means a dwelling unit that is offered to transient guests for a period of less than 30 consecutive days, where the property does not serve as a person's primary residence 145.4. Short Term Home Rental, Type D (Bed & Breakfast) - see the definition of Bed & Breakfast in Para- graph 16 of this Definition Section 31-101. 2. Short Term Home Rental Regulations. Amend City Code Chapter 31 by adding the following Section. Sec. 31-514.1. Short -Term Home Rental Regulations Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Section 31-514.1 is to allow Short Term Home Rentals where appro- priate while mitigating impacts upon surrounding properties by implementing balanced regulations to protect the integrity of the city's neighborhoods as well as protect the general public health, safety and welfare. Subd. 2. License required. No property may be used for Type A, B or C Short Term Home Rental unless granted a license by the city. No property may be used for Type C Short Term Home Rental unless granted a Conditional Use Permit and a license by the city. No property may be used for Type D Short Term Home Rental (aka Bed & Breakfast) unless granted a Special Use Permit by the city pursuant to Section 31-504 of this Chapter. Subd. 3. License application. Any property owner desiring to undertake Short Term Home Rentals must apply to the community development department for a Short Term Home Rental License. A license must be approved prior to operating within the city. The license application request must be submitted on the form prescribed by the city and must include all the information requested on the application form. The license appli- cation will not be accepted by the city unless an inspection report has been signed by personnel from both the city's fire department and building department. Subd. 4. License fee. The license application form must be accompanied by payment in full of the required license application fee. The license application fee amount will be as determined by the city council in the city fee schedule. Subd. 5. License issuance. The process for review and issuance of a license will vary depending upon the type of Short Term Home Rental as follows: A. Type A, Hosted Short Term Home Rentals. Type A Short Term Home Rentals are required to have an ad- ministratively issued license from the city. 1. A Type A Short Term Home Rental license or renewal license will be issued administratively only if: i. The licensee certifies on the application form that all applicable items found in this Section 31-514.1 are satisfied. That includes: a. Proper zoning as found in Subd. 6; and b. Performance standards as found in Subd. 7. ii. The applicant submits a site plan, drawn to scale, showing parking and driveways, all structures and out- door recreational areas that guests will be allowed to use, including, but not limited to, deck/patio, barbeque grill, recreational fire, or sauna. iii. The applicant submits a floor plan, drawn to scale, of the home identifying which rooms will be used as transient guest bedrooms. iv. The property passes the city inspection (see Section 31-514.1, Subd. 9B) for residential code standards applicable to renting a home on a short term basis. The list of health and safety items that will be inspected for this purpose will be included amongst license application materials so that the property owner will know what items will be inspected prior to submitting the license application to the city. a. An inspection must be completed within 60 days prior to submission of the license application form. b. An inspection report must be submitted together with the license application form and other necessary materials. Without the inspection report, the license application will not be considered complete, nor will it be accepted by the city. c. If the inspection identifies items that must be corrected, all corrections must be completed and verified by the city prior to submitting an application for the Short Term Home Rental license. 2. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of the home or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of a Short Term Home Rental, except that additional on-site city code compliant parking may be provided. 3. The licensee must provide proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance at the time of license issuance, and must be able to confirm that the coverage remains in place within 24 hours of a city request for confirmation. 4. Licenses are non -transferable and shall expire upon change of ownership of the property. 5. A license constitutes a limited license granted to the applicant by the city and in no way creates a vested zoning right. 6. No more than a total of thirty-five Type A licenses may be valid within the city at one time. 7. If three substantiated and relevant complaints are received from neighbors or guests within a 12 month period, the license shall be revoked. The revocation may be appealed to the city council pursuant to procedures established in Section 31-217 of this Chapter. If a license is revoked, the owner is prohibited from making appli- cation for another license for any type of Short Term Home Rental for six months. 8. Licenses are valid for a period of three years. A renewal license must be applied for every three years. B. Type B - Unhosted Short Term Rental. Type B Short Term Home Rentals are required to have an admin- istratively issued license from the city. Prior to issuing the license, a neighborhood notification is required, as specified below. 1. A Type B Short Term Home Rental license or renewal license will be issued administratively only if: I. The applicant submits a site plan, drawn to scale, showing parking and driveways, all structures and out- door recreational areas that guests will be allowed to use, including, but not limited to, deck/patio, barbeque grill, recreational fire, or sauna. ii. The applicant submits a floor plan, drawn to scale, of the home identifying which rooms will be used as transient guest bedrooms. iii. The licensee certifies on the application form that all applicable items found in this Section 31-514.1 are satisfied. That includes: a. Proper zoning as found in Subd. 6 b. Performance standards as found in Subd. 7 c. Proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance. iv. No more than a total of thirty-five Type B licenses may be valid within the City at one time. v. Notices have been mailed by the city to all surrounding property owners according to the following stan- dards: a. 150 feet of all applicant properties zoned RB, CCR, CR, TH, CTHR, RCL, RCM, RCH, CBD; b. 200 feet of all applicant properties zoned RA, LR, CTR, TR; c. 500 feet of all applicant properties zoned AP; and vi. There are no objections received by the city within ten days of mailing the notices. a. If objections are received, then the license request must be considered by the planning commission. (1). The planning commission must hold a hearing, to which neighbors within the above defined notification area are invited to offer comments. (2). After considering the license request and hearing comments from the neighbors, the planning commission may either approve a one year provisional license, with or without conditions, or deny the license request. (3). If there are no substantiated relevant complaints from neighbors or guests during the provisional year, the permit will automatically extend two more years. If there are three substantiated relevant complaints, the provi- sional license is automatically revoked and the owner is prohibited from making application for another license for any type of Short Term Home Rental for six months. vii. The property passes the city inspection (see Section 31-514.1, Subd. 9B) for residential code standards applicable to renting a home on a short term basis. The list of health and safety items that will be inspected for this purpose will be included amongst license application materials so that the property owner will know what items will be inspected prior to submitting the license application to the city. a. An inspection must be completed within 60 days prior to submission of the license application form. b. An inspection report must be submitted together with the license application form and other necessary materials. Without the inspection report, the license application will not be considered complete, nor will it be accepted by the city. c. If the inspection identifies items that must be corrected, all corrections must be completed and verified by the city prior to submitting an application for the Short Term Home Rental license. 2. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of the home or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of a Short Term Home Rental, except that additional on-site city code compliant parking may be provided. 3. The licensee must provide proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance at the time of license issuance, and must be able to confirm that the coverage remains in place within 24 hours of a city request for confirmation. 4. If three substantiated and relevant complaints are received from neighbors or guests within a 12 month period, the license shall be revoked. The revocation may be appealed to the city council pursuant to procedures established in Section 31-217 of this Chapter. If a license is revoked, the owner is prohibited from making appli- cation for another license for any type of Short Term Home Rental for six months. 5. Licenses are non -transferable and shall expire upon change of ownership of the property. 6. A license constitutes a limited license granted to the applicant by the city and in no way creates a vested zoning right. 7. Licenses are valid for a period of three years. A renewal license must be applied for every three years. No neighborhood notification is required for the renewal of licenses. C. Type C - Dedicated Short Term Rental. Type C Short Term Home Rentals are required to have both a Conditional Use Permit and an administrative license issued by the city. The Conditional Use Permit and initial license may be processed simultaneously. 1. Conditional Use Permit. The application for the Conditional Use Permit to operate a Type C Short Term Home Rental must be filed with the city's community development department on the applicable form. The ap- plication will be reviewed according to the process established in Sections 31-204 and 31-207 of this Chapter. In addition, the following procedures, criteria and conditions shall also apply: i. The applicant must submit a site plan, drawn to scale, showing parking and driveways, all structures and outdoor recreational areas that guests will be allowed to use, including, but not limited to, deck/patio, barbeque grill, recreational fire, or sauna. ii. The applicant submits a floor plan, drawn to scale, of the home identifying which rooms will be used as transient guest bedrooms. iii. The Conditional Use Permit runs with the land and must be filed in the property's chain of title, but since a license is also required for a Type C Short Term Rental, possession of a Conditional Use Permit is not sufficient to operate. Any new owner desiring to operate a Type C Short Term Rental on property that has an unexpired Conditional Use Permit filed in the chain of title must also obtain a license from the city. A Conditional Use Permit expires if a property is not operated as a Short Term Home Rental for more than a year. iv. The Conditional Use Permit applicant must certify on the city application form that all applicable items found in this Section 31-514.1 are satisfied. That includes: a. Proper zoning as found in Subd. 6 b. Performance standards as found in Subd. 7 c. Proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance. v. The property must pass inspection by city building and fire code inspectors and found to meet the res- idential code standards applicable to renting a home on a short term basis (see Section 31-514.1, Subd 913) prior to holding the public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit. The list of health and safety items that will be inspected for this purpose will be included amongst license application materials so that the property owner will know what items will be inspected prior to submitting the license application to the city. vi. No more than a total of fifteen Conditional Use Permits for Type C Short Term Home Rentals may be valid within the City at one time. 2. License. The application form for the license or renewal license must certify by the applicant that all appli- cable items found in this Section 31-514.1 are satisfied. That includes: Council Ex. E 17-3984 i. A Conditional Use Permit has been issued for the subject property and is still valid. ii. The property has been inspected no more than 60 days prior to submission of the license application by city building and fire code inspectors and found to meet the residential code standards applicable to renting a home on a short term basis. a. An inspection must be completed and the inspection report submitted together with the license application form and other necessary materials. Without the inspection report, the license application will not be considered complete, nor will it be accepted by the city. b. If the inspection identifies items that must be corrected, all corrections must be completed and verified by the city prior to submitting an application for the Short Term Home Rental license. iii. Proper zoning as found in Subd. 6 iv. Performance standards as found in Subd. 7 v. Proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance. vi. No more than a total of fifteen Type C Short Term Home Rental licenses may be valid at one time within the City. 3. The license for a Type C Short Term Home Rental may only be issued to the owner of the property and is not transferable to any other entity. 4. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of the home or premises, or other visible evidence of the conduct of a Short Term Home Rental, except that additional on-site city code compliant parking may be provided. 5. The licensee must provide proof of sufficient and suitable property insurance at the time of license issuance, and must be able to confirm that the coverage remains in place within 24 hours of a city request for confirmation. 6. Type C Short Term Home Rental licenses are valid for a period of three years. A renewal license must be applied for every three years. The Conditional Use Permit will not expire unless its use is discontinued for more than a year. 7. The Type C Short Term Home Rental license is not transferable and shall expire upon change of ownership of the property. 8. A license constitutes a limited license granted to the applicant by the city and in no way creates a vested zoning right. 9. If three substantiated and relevant complaints are received from neighbors or guests within a 12 month period, the license shall be revoked. The revocation may be appealed to the city council pursuant to procedures established in Section 31-217 of this Chapter. If a license is revoked, the owner is prohibited from making appli- cation for another license for any type of Short Term Home Rental for six months. D. Type D - Bed & Breakfast. Type D Short Term Home Rentals are also known as Bed & Breakfasts and are required to have a Special Use Permit as regulated in Section 31-504 of this Chapter. Subd. 6. Zoning District. Short Term Home Rentals are permitted, with an approved license from the City of Stillwater, in the following Zoning Districts: A. Residential Zoning Districts. Type A and B Short Term Home Rentals are allowed by city license in all Residential Zoning Districts. Type C Short Term Home Rentals are allowed by Conditional Use Permit in all Res- idential Zoning Districts. Type D Short Term Home Rentals (aka Bed & Breakfasts) are allowed by city license in the RCL Zoning District and by Special Use Permit in the RB and RCM Zoning Districts. B. Commercial Zoning Districts. Type A, B and C Short Term Home Rentals are permitted by city license in the CBD Zoning District. Subd. 7. Performance standards. Type A, B and C Short Term Home Rentals shall be subject to the following performance standards. Type D Short Term Home Rentals shall be subject to the standards found in Section 31-504 of this Chapter. A. Parking. 1. In residential zoning districts, all guest parking must be accommodated on improved surfaces on the prem- ises. No on -street parking is allowed for guests. At a minimum, parking shall be provided at the following rate: i. 1-2 bedroom unit, 1 space ii. 3 bedroom unit, 2 spaces iii. 4 and 4+ bedroom units, number of spaces equal to the number of bedrooms minus one. 2. In the CBD zoning district, guest parking must either be accommodated on the property of the Short Term Home Rental dwelling unit, or a parking mitigation plan must be approved by the Parking Commission. B. Length of guest stay. The minimum length of stay is one day. The maximum length of stay is 30 days, since more than that is by definition not a Short Term Home Rental property. C. Number of guests. The maximum number of transient guests will be limited to two times the number of bedrooms plus one. D. Guest records. The licensee for Type B and C Short Term Rentals must keep a transient guest record in- cluding the name, address, phone number, and vehicle license plate information for all guests and must provide a report to the city upon 48 hours notice. E. Guest disclosures. The licensee must disclose in writing to their transient guests the following rules and regulations, and must submit a copy of the disclosure to the city with the license application and renewal appli- cations. In addition the disclosures must be conspicuously displayed in the home. 1. For Type B and C Short Term Home Rentals, the name, phone number and address of the owner, operating lessee or managing agent/representative; 2. The maximum number of guests allowed at the property; 3. The maximum number of vehicles allowed at the property and where they are to be parked; 4. Property rules related to use of outdoor features, such as decks, patios, grills, recreational fires, saunas and other recreational facilities; 5. City nuisance ordinances will be enforced by the Stillwater Police Department, including reduced noise levels between 10 PM and 8 AM. 6. No events are allowed to be hosted on the premises. F. License number. The licensee must post their city license number on all print, poster or web advertise- ments. G. Proximity of assistance. For Type B and Type C Short Term Home Rentals, the property owner or a man- ager/representative must be located within 30 minutes travel time of the property. The community development department must be notified within 10 days of a change in the managing agent/representative or their contact information. The licensee must provide the name, address and phone number for the licensee or managing agent/representative to all property owners within 150 feet of the property boundary. The licensee must notify neighboring properties within 10 days of a change in the managing agent/representation or contact information. H. Garbage. As required by City Code Chapter 30-1, Subd 5, all garbage must be kept in rubbish containers that are stored out of view of a public street. I. Signage. No signage is allowed on the property of a Type A, B or C Short Term Home Rental. Type D is allowed signage as regulated in Section 31-504 of this Chapter. J. Events. Events are not allowed to be hosted by transient guests on the premises. For purposes of this Section 31-541.1, an event means a gathering on the premises of more than three un -registered transient guests. Events hosted by the property owner are allowed, but must abide by all applicable city ordinances and polices, including the prohibition on renting private residential property out for events. Subd. 8. Required inspections. A. Type A, B and C Short Term Home Rentals 1. These types of Short Term Home Rentals are required to have, and pass, a health and safety code inspec- tion by city building and fire code staff prior to issuance of a license or renewal of the license. 2. The list of health and safety items that will be inspected for this purpose will be included amongst license application materials so that the licensee will know in advance what items will be inspected. 3. Upon receipt of a complaint, the city zoning administrator will contact the licensee and will determine whether a compliance inspection is required. B. Type D Short Term Home Rentals (aka Bed & Breakfast) 1. This type of Short Term Home Rental is required to have inspections as regulated by Section 31-504. Subd. 9. Limit on number of licenses. No more than a total of thirty-five licenses may be valid at any one time for Type A Short Term Home Rentals. No more than a total of thirty-five licenses may be valid at any one time for Type B Short Term Home Rentals. No more than fifteen licenses may be valid at any one time for Type C Short Term Home Rentals. Type D Short Term Home Rentals are required to have a Special Use Permit, but no license is required. Subd. 10. Sales taxes. In addition to state sales tax, the licensee is required to pay the city lodging tax. A. The city lodging tax must be collected and paid either by the web based booking company that the Short Term Home Rental is listed on, or by the licensee directly to the city if the Short Term Home Rental does not use a web based booking service. B. The license application must supply information on any web based booking service(s) used for the licensed property. C. The licensee, or booking agent on their behalf, is required to pay the city lodging tax quarterly. If no sales are made during a quarter, a report must none the less be submitted to the city stating that no sales were made or lodging tax collected during that quarter. Subd. 11. Interchangeability. A licensee may use the license to operate any Short Term Home Rental type equal to or less restrictive than the one for which the license is issued. Therefore, if an owner is issued a Type C license, the property is permitted to operate as a Type C, B or A. And, a Type B license allows the owner to operate as a Type B or A. However, a Type D owner may only operate as a Bed & Breakfast. Subd. 12. Enforcement. A. In the event of a violation or threatened violation of this ordinance, the city, in addition to other remedies, is entitled to seek Injunctive Relief or proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations or threat- ened violations. B. The penalty for violation of this Section 31-514.1 shall be a Misdemeanor. C. In addition to penalty provisions A and B above, the fine for the first substantiated and relevant complaint or violation shall be $250. The fine for the second shall be $500.00. The fine for the third shall be $750.00 and this third offense shall also result in automatic license revocation. 3. Amend City Code Section 31-315, Allowable Uses in Residential Districts by adding: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS A -P LR CTR RA ITR CCR RB ICR TH CTHR I RCL RCM Bed & Breakfast (type D Short Term Home Rental SUP10 P" SUP Short Term Home Rental; Type A P and B P P P P P P P P P P P Short Term Home Rental; Type ClCUP CUP CUP CUP 1 CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P = Permitted use SUP = Use permitted with a Special Use Permit CUP = Use permitted with a Conditional Use Permit A = Accessory use Blank cell in table means that the use is NOT allowed. 4. Amend City Code Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts by adding: P = Permitted use SUP = Use permitted with a Special Use Permit CUP = Use permitted with a Conditional Use Permit PUD = Use permitted with a Planned Unit Development Permit A = Accessory use ACC = Allowed as an accessory improvement to an allowed use located on or adjacent to the site Blank cell in table means that the use is NOT allowed. 5. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 31 shall remain in full force and effect. 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 2nd day of May, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER /s/ Ted Kozlowski Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Diane F. Ward Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Published in the Stillwater Gazette May 12, 2017 687353 Council xhibit IF Short~Term Rental Housing Permit E7-3984 AN FOR CHANGE OF USE TO VACATION RENTAL HOME Please complete in ink - - Include fees with application Annual Fee on Fee Schedule as posted at www.CityofPriorLake.com Rental Application Renewal is 60 Days Before Expiration Date CONTACT INFORMATION Property Owner Name Owner Phone Property Owner Address Secondary Phone Authorized Agent Name Agent Phone Agent Address Secondary Phone Confirm Owner/Agent Resides Within 30 Miles of Rental Property Yes No Rental Property Address RENTAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel ID # Number of Bedrooms GIS Acres* Total Livable Square Feet Property rented more than 5 -times per calendar month* Yes o No o Off -Street Parking Spaces *Effective January 1, 2016 Property information can be found at WWW.CO.SCOTT.MN.US BUILDING & PARCEL INORMATION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS WITH APPLICATION Confirm Sketch detailing Parking Spaces Yes U No 0 Survey of Property Yes 0No Confirm Owner/Agent has read and understands Ordinance 315 Yes No Confirm Owner/Agent has posted at the Rental Property site a copy of Emergency Contacts Yes No Confirm Owner/Agent has posted at the Rental Property site a copy of rental rules & regulations Yes U No O Other Please submit to City of Prior Lake at 4646 Dakota Street SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372 or email to Dstefanisko@cityofpriorlake.com °� 11R10+ Short -Term Rental Housing Permit �; `,: FOR CHANGE OF USE TO VACATION RENTAL HOME Please complete in ink - - Include fees with application Annual Fee on Fee Schedule as posted at www.CityofPriorLake.com SKETCH OF PROPERTY SHOWING ALL STRUCTURES, DRIVEWAY, PARKING SPACES, SHORELINE, PROPERTY LINES 411cL -AILI A I hereby certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the described property, that the information provided herewith is correct and representative of the existing conditions on the property. I understand that falsifications of this application or any attachments thereto will serve to make this application and any subsequent permit invalid. Owner Signature /s/ Agent Signature /s/ Permit # Permit Expiration Remarks Date Date OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Paid Property Postings Verified Receipt # Approved by Please submit to City of Prior Lake at 4646 Dakota Street SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372 or email to Dstefanisko@cityofpriorlake.com Q4 VRI( -),Short Term Rental Housing Permit Posting U M MUST KEEP POSTED „K 4646 Dakota Street SE I Prior Lake, MN 55372 1952.949.9800 All short term rental of dwelling units shall comply with City Code Section 315. These posted regulations are a summary of a portion of the short term rental regulations. For additional information please refer to City Code Section 315 or contact City Hall. • No person shall undertake the short-term rental of any dwelling unit without a City permit. • The property lines of this unit are marked or identified as follows: • Every permitted premises shall have an agent within 30 miles available during all times the unit is rented, 24 hours a day at the following phone numbers: and/or to respond immediately to complaints and contacts relating to the dwelling unit. • The Maximum Overnight Occupancy for this dwelling unit is: occupants. Not counting children under three (3) years of age. • No watercraft shall be permanently or temporarily placed or stored within the side yard setback of the permitted premises. • Disorderly conduct is prohibited. All disorderly conduct will be reported to the property's agent and the Prior Lake Police Department. • Increased noise regulations are in place between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. • Littering is prohibited. • Recreational fires are limited. Please check with the City to determine what prohibitions exist for current conditions. • Any violation of this Section shall constitute a misdemeanor. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 17 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Big Island Planning Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to proceed with preparation of a Big Island Park planning document to guide future capital improvements and facilitate grant opportunities at the Big Island. 2. Background. Since its creation early in 2017 the Big Island Committee has been interested in developing a plan to improve the Big Island Park and meet the goals of the Big Island Management plan. In particular the Committee is interested in opportunities to provide access to the island to ADA compliant trails and the provision of restroom facilities. In order to inform decision making and move forward with planning and applying for grant opportunity a master plan is required. 3. Project Scope. Prepare a conceptual plan with cost estimates including ADA accessible pathways and destinations throughout park, dock area improvements, overlook / pavilion area, beach improvements, and restroom facilities. Plan will include a site map, programming level estimates and a report. 4. Cost. Bolton and Menk provided a proposal for a fee not to exceed $12,000. Their proposal consists of a base fee and an additional services fee. The additional services fee is for those items necessary to produce a report meeting the minimum requirements of grant submittals to the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails commission. Base Fee $7,600 Additional Service Fee $4,400 $12,000 5. Funding. This project will be funded through the Park Enterprise Fund. The Park Enterprise fund has an estimated EOY17 balance of $618,540. 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that the council accept Bolton and Menk proposal to complete a concept plan for Big Island Park. This plan would then be used to develop and refine the golf course Capital Improvement Plan. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept Bolton and Menk proposal to complete a concept plan for the Golf Course for a fee not to exceed $12,000. Exhibits A. Bolton and Menk Proposal Prepared By: Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV C�BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. October 17, 2017 City of Orono Attn: Adam Edwards PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Big Island Master Plan Dear Adam: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com Thank you for meeting with us to discuss the Big Island Park Master Plan. We are excited for the opportunity to provide master planning services for the Orono community on a unique and historic property. Project Understanding Based on our conversation and project research, we have a strong understanding of the existing infrastructure, the major issues and basic wants associated with the Big Island property. The ultimate goal is to provide a safe, accessible, and unique park experience for all visitors with an understanding of the ongoing maintenance needs and costs associated with the various improvements. Proposed Scope of Services (base fee) We propose to complete the following Big Island Park tasks: 1. Create 2-3 Big Island Park Conceptual Master Plans for review with City Staff/Committee/Community Master Plan Concepts to include but not limited to the following items: • ADA accessible pathways and destinations throughout park • Dock area improvements • Overlook/Pavilion area • Beach improvements • Restroom facilities 2. Develop preliminary cost estimates for the various conceptual plans 3. Attend 2 meetings with City Staff to review/refine/present concepts Fee Estimate (base fee) Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a total not -to -exceed fee of $7,600 to be billed on an hourly basis. H:\0RN0\C13112897\1_Corres\C_To Others\Big Island Master Planning 10-17-17.docx Botton & Menk is an eoual Big Island Master Planning October 17, 2017 Page 2 Additional Services Al. Complete Master Plan Process & Report These additional services will be added to the base fee estimate to meet the minimum requirements of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission for master plans: • Development of existing conditions map including topography • Attend two (2) additional meetings with Parks Commission or Steering Committee to review master plan recommendations • Public open house (to be held immediately after one of the Parks Commission or Steering Committee meetings) Prepare master plan report document including the following: - Overview/introduction - Proposer/implementing agency - Regional context - Site information - Vision, trends, public values - Regional Significance Statement - Public input/participation - Conceptual master plan - Ecological/land resources plan - Programming plan - Research plan - Implementation, management and sustainability plan Additional Services Fee Estimate Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a total not -to -exceed fee of $4,400 to be billed on an hourly basis. Total Fee for full master planning services Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a total not -to -exceed fee of $12,000 to be billed on an hourly basis. We look forward to collaborating with the City of Orono to plan, preserve and promote this unique natural gem within the Orono Community. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. David P. Martini, P.E. Principal Engineer H:\ORNO\C13112897\1_Corres\C_To Others\Big Island Master Planning 10-17-17.docx Bolton & Menk is an eaual AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 18 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: McCulley Road Brush Site Fencing Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is for Council authorization to proceed with managing access to the McCulley Road Brush Site. 2. Background. The City of Orono provides a site for residents to drop of brush on McCulley Road. The site has been quite popular over the last two years since we started allowing year round brush drop off. Prior to that the site had only been open to brush drop off following storm events. The intent of the site was to provide a location for Orono residents to drop off brush. However the site has become a dump site for contractors and others. Public works staff is spending more and more time removing garbage from the site and moving large stumps and logs dropped at the site by contractors. 3. Proposal. In order to control access the city will establish hours of operations and man the site during those hours. The city will establish a brush fee in order to offset the cost of providing an employee to manage the site. The City will install 380' fence and a gate and guard booth. 4. Cost. a. Capital Costs. Item Estimated Cost Gate and 380' of fencing $15,400 Booth and Installation $10,000 Total $25,400 b. Labor Cost. Hours of hours Period of Weeks Total Labor Annual operation per operation Labor Rate Labor cost week hours ($/hr) M -F 12-6, Sa 8-2 36 15 Apr - 15 28 1008 12 $ 12,096 Nov 5. Fees. To cover the cost of the capital improvements and labor the following fee structure is proposed. a. Residents- No cost (Residential material is material brought from a residential property where a resident currently resides, in a private vehicle such as a car, pickup or small trailer.) b. Non Residents and Contractors - $8 / Cubic Yard 6. Funding. Initial capital expenditures can be funded by the Community Investment fund. The fund has a projected EOY17 balance of $436,007. 7. Staff Recommendation. I recommend the council authorize staff to move forward with Brush Site project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize: The city engineer to install fencing, gate and attendant shack at the rush site for a cast not to exceed $25,400. To include a brush drop off fee of $8 per cubic yard for non-residents and contractors and to hire a seasonal employee(s) to man the facility in 2018. Prepared By: 7F Reviewed By:AE Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Exhibits A. Image Map of Brush Site Prepared By: 7E Reviewed By: Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 19 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3987, John Kraemer & Sons o/b/o Ellen Redmond, 2625 Kelly Avenue, ATF CUP (grading) — Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department City Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. This application requires two motions: a. Waive Planning Commission review (requires unanimous approval) b. Consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow removal of material in excess of 500 cubic yards in conjunction with the construction of a new home. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and considered complete on October 23rd. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on December 22, 2017. 3. Background. The owner's architect and builder worked with planning staff through the summer to develop plans for the new home at 2625 Kelly Avenue. The plans were designed to conform to all of the applicable zoning requirements. The building permit application was submitted and after review was shown to meet all setbacks, height, hardcover, and other lot requirements for the LR -1B district. In conjunction with and following the demolition of the existing home, 4,500 cubic yards of fill material was removed from the knob of land where the new house was to be situated. The builder's plan did not call out the quantity of fill leaving the site; nor did the City's review quantify or specifically identify the removal as excessive. During discussions with the builder, staff became aware of the removal quantities and the need for the conditional use permit. The grading of the site was not an "import" of fill and did not appear to result in a home which would be out of character in the neighborhood. 4. Planning Commission Process — Request Waiver The Planning Commission has not reviewed this application. The need for the conditional use permit to address the removal of approximately 4,500 cubic yards of material which was not realized until late October. Due to timing of the discovery of the grading CUP, the weather, and the limited opportunity for a planning commission public hearing, the applicant is requesting that the City Council hold the public hearing. The City Council may waive reference of a conditional use permit application to the Planning Commission for the public hearing according to City Code 78- 912 (Exhibit J). A unanimous vote is required in order to waive the Planning Commission's review. The legal notice was published to allow for a public hearing by the City Council at the November 13th meeting. If the Council votes to waive the Planning Commission's review, and holds the public hearing; staff has prepared an approval resolution for the conditional use permit. Prepared By: MOO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 5bV AGENDA ITEM 5. Public Comment. To date, no comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The action requested for this application is as follows: 1. The Council should first consider a motion to waive the Planning Commission's public hearing and hold the public hearing at the November 13th meeting. 2. Following an affirmative vote to hold the public hearing, the Council should open the public hearing and receive comments. 3. Finally, the Council should consider a motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution as drafted. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Application + Project Narratives Exhibit C. Proposed Grading Plan/Survey Exhibit D. Cut and Fill Calculations Exhibit E. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Exhibit F. Proposed House Plans Exhibit G. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Certified Property Owner List Exhibit I. Maps Exhibit J. City Code Sections Prepared By: MOO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: 5bV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-967 & 78-1286 FILE NO. 17-3987 WHEREAS, on October 23, 2017, John Kraemer, on behalf of the Ellen Redmond Revocable Trust, the owner (hereinafter the "Applicant"), applied for a conditional use permit pursuant to City Code for the property addressed 2625 Kelly Avenue and legally described as: Lot 6, Block 5, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the Northwesterly and Southeasterly line of said Lot 6; That part of Lot 7, Block 5 lying Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Lot 7 from a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 7 distant 62.5 feet Northwesterly from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 7 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Ave. lying between the extensions across it of the above described parallel line and the Northwesterly line of said Lot 7, All in Townsite Of Langdon Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Southeasterly line of that part of Lot 7 described herein marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 5858; Certificate of Title No. 1060940 (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-967 and 78-1286 in order to allow the export of approximately 4,500 cubic yards of fill material from the Property; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, pursuant to City Code Section 78-912, the City Council unanimously voted in favor of waiving the Planning Commission's review of the application; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the City staff and recommended approval of the conditional use permit; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested conditional use permit as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3987. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1 B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains over 3 acres in area and has a defined lot width of approximately 180 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for a conditional use permit for filling and grading activities. 6. In considering this application for conditional use permit, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of City staff and the effect of the proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: The City Council may grant a conditional use permit as it was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city finds that the proposed use at the Property is or will be: 1. Consistent with the community management plan; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature, is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property, and is compliant with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood. The re -grading of the Property will be more in conformance with the neighborhood and will provide a smoother transition from one property to the next. Once completed, the grading will have no impact on surrounding lands. The grades, once vegetated and landscaped should not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed grades will help to facilitate stormwater runoff down property lines, and not toward adjacent properties as is the current condition. The proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The Applicant is proposing to remove a knoll of land to allow for a garage entry on the main level and to accommodate a walk out which is not out of character for the neighborhood, as well as improve Stormwater management. It is likely adjacent lakeshore properties will not be impacted. The site grading will be reviewed and monitored closely by the City's engineer to assure that all existing drainage patterns are maintained and adjacent properties are not adversely impacted. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; This standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area or have an adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, activity of exporting approximately 4,500 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. No complaints have been received. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust, vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The finished grade will be vegetated and landscaped; it should blend into the Property and the neighboring properties. The project, once completed, should not result in undesirable views requiring mitigation. 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; See #9 above. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The Applicant was successful in keeping debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; This standard requires that the project be designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The long term effect of the project should result in minimal environmental impacts. The project will be monitored by the City, to prevent erosion from the site. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The Applicant will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an after -the -fact conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-967 and 78-1286 to allow the export of approximately 4,500 cubic yards of fill material from the Property; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey and grading plan dated 10/19/17 submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit consistent with the submitted plans by Sharratt Design & Company dated 08/30/17 for the new construction and commencing construction of said project or the conditional use permit will expire on that date (November 13, 2018). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Block 5, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the Northwesterly and Southeasterly line of said Lot 6; That part of Lot 7, Block 5 lying Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Lot 7 from a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 7 distant 62.5 feet Northwesterly from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 7 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Ave. lying between the extensions across it of the above described parallel line and the Northwesterly line of said Lot 7, All in Townsite Of Langdon Park. / ^ \ \ \ -INSTALL ROCK \ CONSTRUCTION The Southeasterly line of that part of Lot 7 described herein marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 5858; FOUND IRON W/CAP--- F ENTRANCE PER NOTES Certificate of Title No. 1060940 i SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: i 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent — , `'' ���P ``�'., VS• legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. C/ \ 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. "INSTALL SILT 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. FENCE/eio ROLL `, 9, 4. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. I 1 \ \ \ \ ` 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark I I III I\ \\ \ V I / I 1 %` provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. III I I \ \ V V I I I I \ 6. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition' we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect I I \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ ' FUrD AP- / y \ \ \ I or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match I I RON \ �� \ \ ,�\ BEkH RK: your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building l \ \ \ \o �s \ \� \ TOP OF\ HARDENED \ , WAIL IN �RIVE\950.3V • \ and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. , , - - s/>ti ,� s� \ V , �\ 7. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines are taken from the siding and or stucco of the , - ' " co building. �Fl/� I \ I \ \\ \ \ \ \�s� \14"Lo 17 STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: \ ,- ,q° I I \ ` "Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. oU 1 _C° \\ o 66 V A �r 29.5 9 1 6 � ti I I o� I� I� ,INSTALL SIL T FENCE/BIO ROLL I I I GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: \ \ \ \\ \ �I I I I \ \ ,�� \ , \ \\\� \, \ \� \ \ � ' / 01 T I I ts� BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN \ V A \ V A \ \ \ \ / s 4t �l • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. \ \ \ \ / I ( ` I / / I / / • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. I I 1 1 ' fi-h ; ' off, a =' N I \ I ( I X I INSTALL SIL T- I STEPS Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. 1 I FENCE/BIO ROLLI �� I i •�_ �- y \ I I II I I I I I • A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock PROPOSED .•Q9s \ ,�� I I I I I I extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance \` \\ I _ I__ - - '�� \ �'' I \ �� 3 shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets \V,\a\.4\`W 5ET13A1 C,K lois( I g 7_7\\\OH ___-----------X walks or alleys. Potential entrances that are not so protected shall be closed b fencingto prevent unprotected exit from the site. \ 'r \ s\ � I 1 .I ► I I -k=7* • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the cit standard details. Inlet 1 \\ \\\\ `\\\\ \\ \ �gys �� 9�<"s DWELLING p g Y \ � �\\ \V� VA � \ � \ VA g5� �'� .o -� protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. z I // I (� 1 V `�� \\ \ , AA \ V A �s \ � -0 y 95 J � \ \ 950 ,� o ` DURING CONSTRUCTION: I I I 11\ \\ ('`� \ y s' 3 I � I I; I I , VAA vs\ � \ \ � g963 • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff I I I ( \ \ V AA V ` V A \ V A ` v 9 gyy — C:11 I A I I I I II and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota I I ( I 1 \ 1 11 �+ -INSTALL I SIL T Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. I z I \ \ \ \ 5g i i FENCE BIO ROLL 1 A \ \ VA \\VA�A \ \ gg6.146/0 1 I I I yI % • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularlyS� \ ���i-' \\ to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with I I I \ \ \ \ \\� \ \ \ `7�99� ` �l /I s \ \ \ \ VA _,� OPOSE� Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. �' I I \ \ \ \ , I I ,i I ` i /RETAIN/NG WALK / . \\ � ��VA V A \ s - - • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with I, � \ INSTALL SILT� \\ \\`. � � � � � % Z MPGA requirements. ; \ FENCE/BIO ROLL • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch shown on this plan for "CW" and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection.oal • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. FOUND IRON w/ CAP--__ • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. --,3 • If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Orono requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. .�ORDINgRY HIGH WATER INE (929.4) 92g4) 'PPROx/MgTE EDGE \ OF WA TER v y\ SRO \ \10 I N FOUND 1.. IRON EXISTING CONTOUR _ \ \ � PROPO.SLD CONTOUR 1>RAINA0L' ARROX — PLO Y SILT PLNCL/ST 4# LOGS S \opo/\ 29� CONCRL'TL' 1F,4SHOUT AREA CTY ti �9 T� RL�IODL TO B LX � XI,S'TING FREE I� X F Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 5300 South Hwy. No 101 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Jo a S. Rinke 52716 LICENSE NO. AUGUST 3, 2017 DATE DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE T 0 40' 80' CLIENT NAME /JOB ADDRESS SHARRA TT DESIGN 2625 KELLY AVENUE OR ONO, MN DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 10/11/17 MOVED HOME & REGRADED 10/11 /17 MOVED HOME & REGRADED 10/19/17 REMOVED BLUFF REFERENCE DATESURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 DATE DRAFTED: AUGUST 3, 2017 QWC:C:T TITI C PROPOSED SURVEY SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER 160824 JR SHEET NUMBER S1 SHEET 1 OF 2 City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street Address: 2750 Keiley Parkway \\\ Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax' 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Application Date Received.- Staff eceived:Staff ; Fee: $lap Escrow. $700 / NA Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed can Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: `Z(P'-q K E-` L -L A-v,'E ©}LoNP Mf\) 553 I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (�l F-" I N 6;t ", F i I- L -I N {c...-' - (attached additional sheets at necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: ❑ check Applicant: _3Q H N Phone (Primary): Oi Sze q Mailing Address: 4010 (D Email: c�r p -:;L- 9 if Applicant address should be used for billing RA " --, SONS _C1 i n r-, PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑ check here if Property Owner is same as applicant ❑ check here if Property Owner adrirasc chni iltl ha .en,4 f-, tiM;i Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email.- APPLICANT mail: a APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: CUP Application — January 2017 Page 4 Date: Date: Date: r/ G /?-- LL 7 Date: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — 2625 Kelly Avenue, Orono Outline of Required Submittals: 7. Project Narrative The intention of this project is to remove an existing single family home that is obsolete from the perspective of function, spatial flow, aesthetics, maintenance, and building/energy technology. The proposed home reconstructs and addresses all of these previously limiting factors. The site is very large by most standards. The site rises in the street side yard 30 feet above the road to the existing building pad area. The lake front yard then falls 30 feet from the existing home elevation to the lakeshore at ordinary high water 929.4. The existing home has a tuck under garage/basement, with living space all at the floor above. The proposed home's garage and primary living space are all at the same level with the master bedroom at a 2nd floor and lake entry, rec room, and secondary bedrooms at a new walk -out level. The exterior will be "earthy contemporary," utilizing low maintenance natural materials. The total finished square feet will be 6,300 square feet plus the garage. The reason for cut/fill/removal quantities is to create the walk -out level, which also has a deep/tall ceiling sport court which adds to this quantity. The only awareness of the quantities involved will be the presence of the walk -out level, which has been "exchanged" with the previous home's upper living level; thus, substantially lowering the overall structure's mass and height from the mass and height of the existing home. With a street yard dimension of 340' +/- and a lake yard of 340'— 380', there is more than ample space and ability to provide easy & highly effective construction phase and long-term water management practices that will far exceed most single family building sites in the City of Orono and on Lake Minnetona. The construction of the home will have typical construction hours of 7am to 5 pm. The on-site and street parking will average 10 cars daily. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — 2625 Kelly Avenue, Orono Outline of Required Submittals: 17. Landscape Plan Narrative As an introduction, please see the project narrative. Landscape best practices will be used on both lake side and street side since both drain towards bodies of water. The lakeside yard, with the new walkout, will have less slope towards the lake than previous. The lake yard also has naturally existing, very low slopes to almost flat grades for 150'-220' of distance for water run- off from the existing steeper slopes to soak into the ground. Other water management techniques to be employed will utilize: 1. Pervious pavers systems in selected areas. 2. Catch basins in critical areas to catch and slow down water flow, particularly on the driveway areas. 3. Rain gardens analysis indicates they would be highly effective and beneficial. The growing part of landscaping will also utilize best practices of the following: 1. Existing tree protection outside the building impact area. 2. Preservation of the large flat lake side area. 3. Coniferous plantings for privacy purposes. 4. Other plantings to help "heal" the new construction to merge with existing earth forms, topography, and vegetation. The proposed home at 2625 Kelly Avenue endeavors to be substantially more environmentally friendly than the existing home to be replaced in the reuse on this large and very beautiful site. DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are noted that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ELLEN P- C- D"C) ND First Middle Last PO BOA 28-} GAfzV&R- Ivtr-15 City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. CUP Application — January 2017 Page 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Block 5, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the Northwesterly and Southeasterly line of said Lot 6; That part of Lot 7, Block 5 lying Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Lot 7 from a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 7 distant 62.5 feet Northwesterly from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 7 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, including that part of the vacated Southwesterly 34 feet of Kelly Ave. lying between the extensions across it of the above described parallel line and the Northwesterly line of said Lot 7, All in Townsite Of Langdon Park. / ^ \ \ \ -INSTALL ROCK \ CONSTRUCTION The Southeasterly line of that part of Lot 7 described herein marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 5858; FOUND IRON W/CAP--- F ENTRANCE PER NOTES Certificate of Title No. 1060940 i SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: i 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent — , `'' ���P ``�'., VS• legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. C/ \ 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. "INSTALL SILT 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. FENCE/eio ROLL `, 9, 4. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. I 1 \ \ \ \ ` 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark I I III I\ \\ \ V I / I 1 %` provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. III I I \ \ V V I I I I \ 6. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition' we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect I I \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ ' FUrD AP- / y \ \ \ I or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match I I RON \ �� \ \ ,�\ BEkH RK: your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building l \ \ \ \o �s \ \� \ TOP OF\ HARDENED \ , WAIL IN �RIVE\950.3V • \ and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. , , - - s/>ti ,� s� \ V , �\ 7. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines are taken from the siding and or stucco of the , - ' " co building. �Fl/� I \ I \ \\ \ \ \ \�s� \14"Lo 17 STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: \ ,- ,q° I I \ ` "Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. oU 1 _C° \\ o 66 V A �r 29.5 9 1 6 � ti I I o� I� I� ,INSTALL SIL T FENCE/BIO ROLL I I I GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: \ \ \ \\ \ �I I I I \ \ ,�� \ , \ \\\� \, \ \� \ \ � ' / 01 T I I ts� BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN \ V A \ V A \ \ \ \ / s 4t �l • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. \ \ \ \ / I ( ` I / / I / / • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. I I 1 1 ' fi-h ; ' off, a =' N I \ I ( I X I INSTALL SIL T- I STEPS Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. 1 I FENCE/BIO ROLLI �� I i •�_ �- y \ I I II I I I I I • A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock PROPOSED .•Q9s \ ,�� I I I I I I extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance \` \\ I _ I__ - - '�� \ �'' I \ �� 3 shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets \V,\a\.4\`W 5ET13A1 C,K lois( I g 7_7\\\OH ___-----------X walks or alleys. Potential entrances that are not so protected shall be closed b fencingto prevent unprotected exit from the site. \ 'r \ s\ � I 1 .I ► I I -k=7* • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the cit standard details. Inlet 1 \\ \\\\ `\\\\ \\ \ �gys �� 9�<"s DWELLING p g Y \ � �\\ \V� VA � \ � \ VA g5� �'� .o -� protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. z I // I (� 1 V `�� \\ \ , AA \ V A �s \ � -0 y 95 J � \ \ 950 ,� o ` DURING CONSTRUCTION: I I I 11\ \\ ('`� \ y s' 3 I � I I; I I , VAA vs\ � \ \ � g963 • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff I I I ( \ \ V AA V ` V A \ V A ` v 9 gyy — C:11 I A I I I I II and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota I I ( I 1 \ 1 11 �+ -INSTALL I SIL T Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. I z I \ \ \ \ 5g i i FENCE BIO ROLL 1 A \ \ VA \\VA�A \ \ gg6.146/0 1 I I I yI % • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularlyS� \ ���i-' \\ to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with I I I \ \ \ \ \\� \ \ \ `7�99� ` �l /I s \ \ \ \ VA _,� OPOSE� Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. �' I I \ \ \ \ , I I ,i I ` i /RETAIN/NG WALK / . \\ � ��VA V A \ s - - • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with I, � \ INSTALL SILT� \\ \\`. � � � � � % Z MPGA requirements. ; \ FENCE/BIO ROLL • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch shown on this plan for "CW" and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection.oal • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. FOUND IRON w/ CAP--__ • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. --,3 • If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Orono requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. .�ORDINgRY HIGH WATER INE (929.4) 92g4) 'PPROx/MgTE EDGE \ OF WA TER v y\ SRO \ \10 I N FOUND 1.. IRON EXISTING CONTOUR _ \ \ � PROPO.SLD CONTOUR 1>RAINA0L' ARROX — PLO Y SILT PLNCL/ST 4# LOGS S \opo/\ 29� CONCRL'TL' 1F,4SHOUT AREA CTY ti �9 T� RL�IODL TO B LX � XI,S'TING FREE I� X F Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 5300 South Hwy. No 101 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Jo a S. Rinke 52716 LICENSE NO. AUGUST 3, 2017 DATE DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE T 0 40' 80' CLIENT NAME /JOB ADDRESS SHARRA TT DESIGN 2625 KELLY AVENUE OR ONO, MN DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 10/11/17 MOVED HOME & REGRADED 10/11 /17 MOVED HOME & REGRADED 10/19/17 REMOVED BLUFF REFERENCE DATESURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 DATE DRAFTED: AUGUST 3, 2017 QWC:C:T TITI C PROPOSED SURVEY SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER 160824 JR SHEET NUMBER S1 SHEET 1 OF 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — 2625 Kelly Avenue, Orono Outline of Required Submittals: 9. Cut and Fill Calculation Cut and Fill Breakdown: Cut and Fill Section (From Stripped Surface to Subgrade: excludes Strip, Over -excavation and Trench Volume) Region Bank Cut (yd3) Bank Fill (yd3)(@30.00%)(Yd3) Expnd. Cut For Comp. Fill (@20.00%)(Yd3) Export/Import (yd3) existing house 869 14 1130 18 1112 garage 1.23 33 1.6 42 40 spct storage 96 0 125 0 125 sportcourt 426 1.38 554 1.73 552 house 544 0 707 0 707 pool mech 170 0 221 0 221 crawl space 32 0.03 42 0.03 42 pool 195 1.01 253 1.26 252 stoop 2.88 3.86 3.74 4.82 1.08 Total Work Region 4022 553 5229 691 4538 Total Cut: 4538 yd3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: The City Council may grant a conditional use permit as it was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city finds that the proposed use at the Property is or will be: 1. Consistent with the community management plan; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature, is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property, and is compliant with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood. The re- grading of the Property will be more in conformance with the neighborhood and will provide a smoother transition from one property to the next. Once completed, the grading will have no impact on surrounding lands. The grades, once vegetated and landscaped should not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed grades will help to facilitate stormwater runoff down property lines, and not toward adjacent properties as is the current condition. The proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The Applicant is proposing to remove a knoll of land to allow for a garage entry on the main level and to accommodate a walk out which is not out of character for the neighborhood, as well as improve Stormwater management. It is likely adjacent lakeshore properties will not be impacted. The site grading will be reviewed and monitored closely by the City's engineer to assure that all existing drainage patterns are maintained and adjacent properties are not adversely impacted. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; This standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area or have an adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, activity of exporting approximately 4,500 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. No complaints have been received. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust, vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The finished grade will be vegetated and landscaped; it should blend into the Property and the neighboring properties. The project, once completed, should not result in undesirable views requiring mitigation. 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; See #9 above. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The Applicant was successful in keeping debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; This standard requires that the project be designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The long term effect of the project should result in minimal environmental impacts. The project will be monitored by the City, to prevent erosion from the site. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of- way or neighboring residential uses or districts; There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The Applicant will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. GENERAL NOTES: 1. SHARRATT DESIGN e COMPANY MAKES NO WARRANTY AS TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS TO BE ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED TO DELINEATE THE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB -CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM FIELD INVESTIGATION BEFORE UNDERTAKING ANY DEMOLITION OR RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. G.G. AND ALL SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLETELY FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS BY VISITING THE SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THEIR PROPOSALS. 2. THE DEMOLITION NOTES AS SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS GENERALLY OUTLINE VARIOUS ITEMS OF DEMOLITION WORK. THEY ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS INCLUSIVE OF ALL GUTTING, DEMOLITION OF FINISHES AND REQUIRED PATCHING. ALL TRADES ARE EXPECTED TO READ ALL DEMOLITION NOTES. 3. SHARRATT DESIGN $_: COMPANY RECOMMENDS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR ALL PROJECTS. IF CLIENT ELECTS NOT TO HAVE ENGINEERING PROVIDED, GENERAL CONTRACTOR ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND RELATED RISK, AND FOR COORDINATION OF ENGINEERING WITH THERMAL., MOISTURE, AND BULK WATER ENVELOPES. 4. WARRANTIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS OR GREATER. REGISTERED BUILDER PROGRAMS AND/OR PRODUCT WARRANTIES. LIABILITY AND WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WILL BE REQUIRED FROM ALL SUBCONTRACTORS. 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO WORK THROUGH THE ENTIRE BUILDING PROCESS. G.G. TO CONTACT GOPHER ONE TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND ELEGTRIGAL, UTILITIES, SEWER, GABLE, GAS, ETC. PRIOR TO GOI" II" IENGING WORK. IMMEDIATELY REPORT AND/OR REVIEW ALL QUESTIONS, DISCREPANCIES AND CONDITIONS WITH THE OWNER/ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 0. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MATERIALS AS INDICATED SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR SIMILAR GUSTO" RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL GONFOR-1 TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 8. ALL SURVEY DATA, SOIL DATA, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, SIZES AND LAYOUTS (INCLUDING TRUSS, FRAMING, AND GIRDER DESIGN) SHALL BE BY THE RESPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTOR AND/OR SUPPLIER OF THOSE SYSTEMS OR BY OTHER NECESSARY CONSULTANTS AND SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. INFORMATION SHOWN IN REGARD TO THESE CONCERNS IS ONLY DIAGRAMMATIC AND IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN INDICATION OF THE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. USE OF CONSULTANT DATA BY SDG DOES NOT INFER OR ENDORSE THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA. EACH CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GORREGTNESS AND AGGURAGY OF DATA SUPPLIED BY THE RESPECTIVE CONSULTANT AND/OR CONTRACTOR. 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND SITE THE BUILDING ON THE OWNER'S LEGAL SURVEY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCOVERED DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. 10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SHORING AND BRACING AND FOR ALL TEMPORARY FACILITIES �. SERVICES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO POWER, WATER, TELEPHONE, FAX, SANITATION FACILITIES AND FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND ANY SPEGIFIG ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ISSUES ARISING FROM CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE. 12. THE GONTRAGTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE SITE IN FIRST -GLASS CONDITION DURING THE PROJECT. ALL WASTE AND DEBRIS SHALL PROMPTLY BE REMOVED. CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO MATERIAL STORAGE ON THE SITE AND ITS IMPACT ON ADJOINING NEIGHBORS. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FINAL GLEANING OF ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SURFACES. ALL TRANSPARENT MATERIALS ARE TO BE LEFT IN A POLISHED CONDITION. REMOVE ALL LABELS THAT ARE NOT INTENDED TO REMAIN AS PERMANENT INSTRUCTION INFORMATION. 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OWNER PERTAINING TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MEGHANIGAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. COMPILE AND FORWARD TO THE OWNER ALL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS DATA AND WARRANTIES IN THE FORM OF A WELL -ORGANIZED OWNERS NOTEBOOK. 15. ROOF TRUSS ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY TRUSS SUPPLIER. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO FIELD - VERIFY ALL FRAMED DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO TRUSS FABRICATION. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO COORDINATE FINAL TRUSS SOLUTION WITH PROJECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND/OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO COORDINATE TRUSS DESIGN WITH ENERGY HEEL REQUIREMENTS. 10. ALL WINDOW DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR MARVIN WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE BID ALTERNATE FOR OTHER WINDOW MANUFACTURERS - SEE SPEGIFIGATIONS FOR ALTERNATES. SUPPLIER TO SUBMIT WINDOW SCHEDULE TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLACING WINDOW ORDER. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM TEMPERED GLASS LOGATIONS, EGRESS AND VENT WINDOW REQUIREMENTS, LITE PATTERNS, WINDOWSIZES, WINDOW OPERATION, JAMB SIZES, EXTENSION JAMBS, ETC. W/OWNER. WINDOWS ARE TO BE PREFINISHED METAL GLAD WINDOWS WITH DOUBLE -PANE, "LOW -E" INSULATED GLASS AND SIMULATED DIVIDED LITES ON BOTH SIDES OF GLASS WITH SPACER BARS (ASSUME 11/8" S.D.L. MUNTIN BARS), PRE -FINISHED COLOR AND HARDWARE FINISH AS SELECTED BY OWNER (BID OIL -RUBBED BRONZE). WINDOWS TO BE SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SPECIFICATION TO THOSE INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. WINDOW MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF ALL CUSTOM WINDOWS AND DOORS TO G.G. AND OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRIGATION. 17. CABINET DRAWINGS... (TBD) ....ARE NOT CABINET SHOP DRAWINGS, BUT DEPICT DESIGN INTENT ONLY. CABINET MANUFACTURER TO COORDINATE FINAL CABINET DESIGN WITH AS -BUILT DIMENSIONS (FIELD -VERIFY), WITH FIELD CHANGES MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, WITH FINAL MILLWORK PROFILES, WITH FINAL GOUNTERTOP THICKNESS AND DESIGNS, AND WITH FINAL APPLIANCE AND FIXTURE SELECTIONS. CABINET MAKER TO VERIFY END PANEL DESIGNS AND CABINET CLEARANCES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CABINET FABRICATION. GABINET MAKER TO MEET WITH OWNERS TO DISCUSS AND VERIFY ALL DRAWER AND GABINET DIVISIONS AND USES, INCLUDING PULLOUT LOCATIONS, SPICE PARTITION LOCATIONS, LAZY SUSAN LOCATIONS, GUTTING BOARD LOCATIONS, COST RAMIFICATIONS, AND ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS THE GABINET MAKER OR OWNER MAY HAVE FOR MAXIMIZING CABINETRY EFFICIENCY AND EASE OF USE. ALSO GONFIR" GABINET HARDWARE QUANTITIES AND OPERATION FOR HINGES / DRAWER GLIDES, AND KNOB LOCATIONS. SUBCONTRACTORS TO REFER TO APPROVED GABINET SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ROUGH FRAMING FOR GABINETS/BUILT-INS. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO G.G., OWNER AND GABINET MAKER PRIOR TO PROGEEDING WITH WORK. 18. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE OWNERS, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SAMPLES OF ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS, INCLUDING PROFILES, SIZES, SPECIES, MORTAR AND GROUT COLORS, JOINT SIZES, FINISHES AND COLORS PRIOR TO ORDERING OF SAME. SAMPLES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE HOMEOWNER DEEMS NECESSARY, AND IN SIZE LARGE ENOUGH TO SEE IN THE FINAL SPACE (E.G. 4'X4' WALL PAINT SAMPLES, AND STAINED AND FINISHED WOOD FLOOR SAMPLES). G.G. TO COORDINATE OWNERS' REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MOCKUPS OF INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR CASTINGS, TRIM, NEWELS, AND RAILINGS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR ORDERING OF SAME (ON SITE WHEN OWNER DEEMS NECESSARY). OWNER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE MOCKUPS OF ALL STONE ON SITE, INCLUDING SIZE 8F SPECIES, MORTAR JOINT SIZE, MORTAR COLOR. STONE STAGK, GAP SPECIES AND SIZE. STONE SAMPLES SHALL BE DISPLAYED ALONGSIDE RELEVANT INTER AND EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS, AS REQUIRED FOR FINAL COLOR PALLET COORDINATION. G.G. SHALL COORDINATE OWNERS COUNTERTOP SELECTIONS, AND SHALL VERIFY THAT NATURAL STONE SLABS THAT OWNER SELECTS ARE PROPERLY STORED, AND USED IN THE FINAL PROJECT. 19. DIMENSIONS LOCATING EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING AND/OR FACE OF FOUNDATION WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIMENSIONS LOCATING INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIMENSIONS LOCATING DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF OPENING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 20. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2x0 AS PER BUILDING SECTIONS, U.N.O. ALL BEARING WALLS, PLUMBING WALLS, AND WALLS WITH POGKET DOORS TO BE 2x0 CONSTRUCTION, U.N.O. ALL OTHER WALLS TO BE 2x4 CONSTRUCTION TO THIGKNESS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, U.N.O. HEADERS SHALL SIZED PER STRUCTURAL PLANS, OR COORDINATED WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR CABINETS, BATH AND KITCHEN HARDWARE AND ACCESSORIES, HANDRAILS, ETC. VERIFY BLOCKING LOCATIONS W/G.G. PRIOR TO FRAMING. 21. SITE PLAN AND RELATED INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SURVEYOR IS USED HERE TO SHOW DESIGN INTENT ONLY. VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS W/ SURVEYOR. 22. PROVIDE ACOUSTIC INSULATION AND PARTITIONS PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACOUSTIC INSULATION LOGATIONS W/OWNER PRIOR TO VAPOR BARRIER $. DRYWALL INSTALLATION. AGOUSTIG CONSIDERATION TO BE GIVEN TO HVAG DUCT LAYOUTS AND PLUMBING LOCATIONS, AND ACOUSTIC DAMPENING TO BE PROVIDED TO HVAG SYSTEM AND PLUMBING WASTE STACKS AS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE SOUND TRANSMISSION. 23. PLUMBING ROUGH -IN DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ALL PLUMBING DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE COORDINATED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTOR WITH SPECIFIC FIXTURE SELECTIONS AND FINAL GABINET DESIGN. ALL FLOOR DRAINS CONNECTED TO SANITARY SEWER TO HAVE BAGK-FLOW PREVENTERS INSTALLED. 24. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 8,: CONTROL LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION - SEE DRAWINGS FOR PROPOSED LOGATIONS. MAKEUP AIR TO BE PROVIDED AS PER LR.G. AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. SUPPLY AND RETURN REGISTER COVERS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER - ASSUME FLUSH WOOD VENTS TO MATCH WOOD FLOOR SPECIES 8.: FINISH FOR BID. WHERE AFFECTED BY MECHANICAL DUCTS AND EQUIPMENT, CEILING HEIGHTS AND SOFFIT SIZES AND LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF HVAG DUCTS AND EQUIPMENT. ALL VENT AND GRILLE LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 25. DOOR 8,: DOOR HARDWARE 8,: WINDOW SCHEDULE SHALL BE BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. G.G. TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR OWNER AND ARCHITECT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRGATION. A- Al INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ool DOOR TAG O KEY NOTES 201 ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AC BUILDING AND ool WINDOW s d REVISION TAG UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN WALL SECTIONS ROOF PLAN TAG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 IOTA EQUIPMENT Col ELEGTRIGAL AND BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS TAG LIGHTING A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIXTURE TAG 1 GRIDS 333A PLUMBING 0,2 WALL TAG X TAG MASTER ELEVATION HEIGHT CENTER LINE CLOSET 333 ROOM TAG 150 SF s h a t r a 4d S61 company i Am�_ !I 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AC LOWER LEVEL. FLOOR PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AS) ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GO"PANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE �z w 5 0 w Z w-1( U1 Of Q m ci O U D U 0) W�- N( m� I- (j) Z () Of 0 Z 0 Q � Z O U Q�L r Z= OC O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2025 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. IATI O N :NUE, ORONO I"IN UPDATED 08-30-2017 LOT AREA: STREET FRONTAGE: LOT DEPTH - (NW) 3.18 ACRES 1138,571 S.F. 187.41' 769.78' WATERSHED: LAKE FRONTAGE: LOT DEPTH - (SE) 3 - Minnehaha Creek 212.16' 753.33' D NOTES SETBACKS ZONING PROPOSED AlO LOT IS LARGER THAN FRONT 30.0' 344.2' BUILDING SEGTIONS TWO ACRES YARD A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 LOT IS LARGER THAN LAKE (SETBACK) AVERAGE LAKESHORE AVERAGE LAKESHORE NTERIOR ELEVATIONS TWO ACRES INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SGHEDULES SETBACK SETBACK X INTERIOR 10.0' 22.5' SIDE (NW) INTERIOR SIDE (SE) 10'-0" 52.5' BUILDING HEIGHT ELEVATION KEY: 1" 996'- 6" - Max building height (30'-0" per Orono Code) 989' - 3 3/8" - Median height of highest gable 976'- 6" Upper level subfloor ' �- s F - 9�- 6. (MEDIAN HEIG10 HT PURPOSED- HIGHEST OP -ADE) 966'- 6" - Highest grade at foundation 964'- 0 3/4" - Main level subfloor 3" (MAX HEIGHT PURPOSED- 961'- 0" Garage slab elevation EXIST AVG. GRADE) 953'- 0" Lower level slab elevation (Walkout) 945'- 0" Proposed lowest slab elevation (Sport Court Only) 932'- 6" Regulatory flood protection elevation for Lake Minnetonka 929'- 6" Ordinary high water mark sharra ClIes company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a rrattcles ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A9 ROOF PLAN AlO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A1.3 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SGHEDULES PROJECT TEAT" ARCHITECT 5HARRA77 DESIGN 8 GOMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL CONTRACTOR JOHN KRAEMER �t SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W U m w U W� W U1 oc C O U U~1 W m t- 01 Vz a z j (y o o Q � z O u z= Ou oc O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I IN SHEET A2 LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. �D; COPYRIGHT 2oiG SHARRATT DESIGN a COMPANY LLC. 110 -.en" 959' - 011 9581- 011 9571 _ 011 i� 9551- Off 9541- 011 9631 ♦00- 952' - 011 951/, 011 950' _ 011 ''o 110- 1496 I�0 � '�S s ,,o 'ss -p '0t9 6' '<<9 6' 951' - 0" V h' 140-1696 M 9Mo '-O 1 'ass 1 1 1 "0 ♦ s '9 1 110 -1096 sharra cllesiT4 company L %:%4 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharra-ftdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I♦'IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A9 ROOF PLAN AlO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A1.3 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 NTER0P, ELEVATIONS A24 3GHF-DULF3 o PLAN �Ty NORTH o = 8rl"41"\ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A3 1/811 = 1'-01' ISSUE DATE V w U T- z w w a -A m Ci U U D(j) U~1 w m v - a Z Q j (y o z~ o Q z O z Ou oc s O 05/19/17 X 1 PROJECT TEAT" ARCHITECT 07/24/17 1 5HARRA77 DESIGN 8 GOMPANY 08/30/17 1 404 SECOND ST - SJITE 100 X EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 1 WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 1 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 CD CO Cfl �9s w Cn CO al C9 C4 (D (31 al 00, (0 CO CO CO (O 01 N w 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR �� - - O-, 0 0 0 1 0 ` 0 0 0_ O,, 1 I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 JOHN KR AEMER �-: SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE 1 EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 env/ LnI npF ISSUED FOR o PLAN �Ty NORTH o = 8rl"41"\ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A3 1/811 = 1'-01' ISSUE DATE V w U T- z w w a -A m Ci U U D(j) U~1 w m v - a Z Q j (y o z~ o Q z O z Ou oc s O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I♦'IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. �D; COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN & COMPANY LLC. 1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLAN A4 J 1/411 = 1'-0" 0 2' 4' 8' u PLAN NORTH sharra ClIes company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 W W � Of -1 m� 0 o D (Y N m R- Z 5 ([pill �U ZOL 0 Q Z o Z= 8 O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. r I I r---------------------------------------- - I I L ------------------ I I i I I i I I I I I I I I I i II i I I I I II it II I I I I I i I I II I I I I �- I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I i II II I I I I II II II I I i II I i I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i II i I II I i II li I II I I POOL ABOVE II I I 1 II i I A14 II I I I Ili II I I I i II I I II I I I I I I I I i I I I III I i II II I I I I II II II I II II II II I Ili II II i III I i II I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LI I --------------------------------- ---------------- J I I -- ----------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------� i7------------------------� I I I I LJ - I I - I I Ili III I ill Ili I II IIS I I , I FRONT ENTRY ABOVE I , I , I I I , I , I i r------� ---1-------I- a I I I L r- - I , I SLAB LEDGE 2 A15 HOUSE ABOVE FOUNDATION WALLS PER I I FOUNDATION PLAN TYP. - - I I I I I I I I I I II I L---______________ I I I II I I I I I L-� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L -------- ----------------------------------------L L -----------------L I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L____J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I IL J I I I I I I I L----------- L - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I r� I I I r � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L J 2 1 Al2 A13 SLAB LEDGE GENERAL PLAN NOTES: r-- iI I I r ----------I I � I � ---------------------------------------------------------------------------J I , I I I I I I ' I I I ' I I I i L ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I FOUNDATION WALLS PER FOUNDATION PLAN TYP. \ , I I I I I I II ' I I _ I I - I I I I I I 0" =V - I I I I I I I GE ' I � ------------------- I . I � I . , I . , I I I I - I I I GARAGE ABOVE I I I I � JMP I 01 I I JMP I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II j I I I I I I jl I I I I i I I I II I I II I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I IL I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I II li r I - I 7 J I GENERAL PLAN NOTES: r-- iI I I r ----------I I � I � ---------------------------------------------------------------------------J I , I I I I I I ' I I I ' I I I i L ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I FOUNDATION WALLS PER FOUNDATION PLAN TYP. \ , I I I I I I II ' I I _ I I - I I I I I I 0" =V - I I I I I I I GE ' I � ------------------- I . I � I . , I . , I I I I - I I I GARAGE ABOVE I I I I � JMP I 01 I I JMP I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II j I I I I I I jl I I I I i I I I II I I II I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I IL I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LJ I L ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE - ALL WALLS TO BE BID AS 1/2" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 SMOOTH -SANDED FINISH. SEE BUILDER SPEGIFIGATIONS. - ALL CEILINGS TO BE BID AS 5/8" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH UNLESS NOTED. SEE BUILDER 5PEGIFIGATIONS. - G.G. TO COORDINATE DOOR THRESHOLD OPTIONS/SIZES AND SHOWER CURB HEIGHTS WITH OWNERS $-: DISG1-55 A.D.A. AND MATERIALS. BID STANDARD SILLS AND THRESHOLDS. - ASSUME ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL.) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS. AGOUSTIGALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES �. SUMP LINES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR NET 8': BLOWN CEILINGS. - STANDARD FORGED AIR HEATING AND GOOLING, TYP. - GLO5ET ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS TYPICAL, WITH ROD � SHELF IN ANY GLOSET5 NOT SPECIFIED ON R.F.S.. - INSULATION R -VALUES, VAPOR RETARDERS, FOOTING DEPTHS, DRAIN TILE AND WATERPROOFING, DRAINAGE PLANES, FRAMING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND ROOF VENTILATION TO MEET OR EXCEED APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY WITH LOCAL INSPECTORS. CONSTRUCTION QUALITY TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH HIGH-END CUSTOM HOME CONSTRUCTION. - ON-SITE ENAMEL AND STAIN FINISHES RECOMMENDED. - BOXED -UP 545 WOOD BEAMS FROM 5/4 POPLAR ABOVE GREAT ROOM TO BE PAINTED - PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR OWNER REVIEW AND APPROVAL --- 1 SPORT COURT PLAN A5 J 1/411 = 1'-0" 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN NORTH sharra cies company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GOMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - -952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE �L w U W ZQ w-1� U1 SL Of m Ci U D U 'a-) W N m 1= Z 5 [[pull Z 0 Q Z U Q::)L r Z= OL O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN �E COMPANY LLC. 0 WATER TABLE 1 � A14 WATER TABLE HSS COLUMN o STEP STONE LEDGE TO FOLLOW GRADE . M. 15-o" 3 T %M. 14'-6" 15-o" 33'-0 2 1 2 Al2 A13 A13 2 4' N. A15 INTERIOR INSULATION WATER AT STONE LEDGES TABLE 4- ---------- ------ LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF 002 959 SF I 0" STONE O TYP w o01 w o02 w-ooa X A15 Z 07/24/17 X I 6'-11If" 08/30/17 o w INTERIOR X DETAIL W INSULATION AT 6' - 61/4" 5- 10 3/4" WATER 5' -1" I d C) W_ D. FR STONE LEDGES TABLE LOWER PATIO STRUGTURAL COLUMNS m U PER STRUCTURAL Q d ° 01/2'.ST E•LEDGE, w CONC. Q a o m o FULL 0' STONE VENEER - _2" SLAB -LEDGE BEAM LINE 1r2..aT M l9 e ° d"- e, a - - III I A N 19 G V2 -"PLANK -LE-0G� d Z 0 I R A 0 I SPORT=:::::J a - p(° Y Ln w z �9 J 0, STONE L G `� COURT O SQUARE GUT POOL EQUIP PER INSTALLER III III III STONE GAP a Z q e °a adJ,a 0 172" FRAMr1NG L GE ' LOWER -UNEXCAVATED/ A - d STAIRS— 3 o °d I STAIRS \`\ COMPACTED FILL d= CPT e D'S'LN DW CV 30"FRIG I a -o____ -- r�,7 --- -j __ __ ` SEE SPORT GOUIkT �" O III II,a '� OI -' FOUNDATION AT 24' sl K I I I \ PLAN FOR RAILING �� O --- -- 4 - 21/8" 4' -57/8" GARAGE DOOR - °a c\v OPENING IN 111 a ' -- OPENINGS _GONG. PLAN� .: �[ AND STAIR NOTES FOR MEGH ,a z - - - - - - - - FURNACE a III III a, Q Q FURNACE a: -- -- - � LOWER�\ �, a O 3 w 36. UP 18 R. i i �— —n KITCHE t- 1 BOX OUT DRYWALL x BLj EAM LINE POOL - d Ic ;11'-0" X 13'- " AROUND BEAM ABOVE ,/ •\ MECH 1 O •� MECHANICAL �.- .. CONC. TILE ---i---- m ul TILE r e 6'-2" x 41'-0" 009 F.D. o j — CONC. o o - HT couNTERroP -�- SLAB ELEV: -1 BEA ' LINE �\ I �Il a a I,°L 952'- 10"vw TILE O w �� a W Q GOLUMN LL N Z 952'- 10 1 /2" HSS 0. 3o m rq `a BEAM LINE — 3 8 3 SPORT COURT STRUCTURAL 42" HIGH WOOD e c `\\\ m GAPPED PONY GLEAR , 'E l9 _ POOL DEPTH W." WALL TO REC O��V HSS GOLUMIN 945'- 010 a CA z{u -T- g 24„_5„ Q Z cV _ — THSD 2x8 Q z o - Z W a 9'-0 LL d� OF STAIRS OL ooa 3 \`\\ cPT LOW E z o SLA J — A14 v- 95 1'x 1' PORT FOR POOL EQUIP 0F.D. U 18" BELOW POOL FILL LINE `� w-ooa ,��N LL \\ \\ 953 - 0' , '..:a O OVERHANG 2X8 w N °a FURNACE Z C) WALL TO ALIGN o `, GUEST #3 3 0 cJl 31/4" UNEXCAVATED/ ol CLEAR m WITH WALL BELOW \`, CLOSET I o a - GOI" IPAGTED FILL - BEAM LINEA BEAM LINE ��,' — — — — — — — — — — — THE t;� — — — — — — — — —2x-5 — — — — — — — — — — — 00 e HS GOLUMN - \j w °- a TILED WALL (� o0 I Q : w GONG. PLANK w _ _! a .Z TUB CRAWL SPACE w/ TOPPING Z J INTERIOR INS. AT _H BUILT-INTWIN � _ ` -o. SLAB ELEV: `� STONE CLADDING N fl w I N INTERIOR INS. AT STONE CLADDING 958' 10 1/2" CID 4" PLANK LEDGE N I J 14'-6" 15-o" 33'-0 2 1 2 Al2 A13 A13 2 4' N. A15 INTERIOR INSULATION WATER AT STONE LEDGES TABLE 4- ---------- ------ LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF 002 959 SF I 0" STONE O TYP 4- - STONE. LE d - - - d 4 ° �. - I o - I -5'1/2" TEM`WALL ae _ I I o "8" PLANTER ABOVE FRAMING LEDG> " TO�JE=LEDGE - / -----� --------- ---- CPT C14 SLAB THSD 1129 SF LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF 002 959 SF I 0" STONE O TYP w o01 w o02 w-ooa X Z 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 o w WATER TABLE X DETAIL W ZI 6' - 61/4" 6' - 61/4" 5- 10 3/4" 5' -1" _Z � 6' - 3" C) W_ D. FR LOWER PATIO STRUGTURAL COLUMNS m U PER STRUCTURAL Q w CONC. a m o FULL 0' STONE VENEER BEAM LINE l9 A N A A Z 0 R A 0 SPORT=:::::J a - p(° Y Ln w z �9 J 0, STONE L G `� COURT O SQUARE GUT STONE GAP Z 0 172" FRAMr1NG L GE - d o I STAIRS \`\ 17'-0" CLG D'S'LN DW CV 30"FRIG a -o____ __ __ ` SEE SPORT GOUIkT �" O :. a FOUNDATION AT 24' sl K I I I \ PLAN FOR RAILING �� O GARAGE DOOR - °a c\v 111 OPENINGS AND STAIR NOTES FURNACE a a: LOWER�\ �, #1 w i i �— —n KITCHE t- 1 BOX OUT DRYWALL x - d Ic ;11'-0" X 13'- " AROUND BEAM ABOVE ,/ •\ MECH 1 O •� ---i---- m ul TILE r 009 F.D. dy - HT couNTERroP -�- -1 BEA ' LINE �\ TILE �Il 952'- 10 1 /2" HSS COLUMN PER a rq 3 8 3 SPORT COURT STRUCTURAL 42" HIGH WOOD �° DROPPED BEAM LINE SLAB `\\\ GAPPED PONY GLEAR , 'E WALL TO O��V HSS GOLUMIN 945'- 010 a CA FOLLOW ANGLE THSD 2x8 THSD OF STAIRS OL ooa ' l(1 I \`\\ cPT `� w-ooa ,��N LL \\ \\ 953 - 0' , '..:a OVERHANG 2X8 w N WALL TO ALIGN o `, GUEST UNEXCAVATED/ a WITH WALL BELOW \`, CLOSET I o a - GOI" IPAGTED FILL - BEAM LINEA ��,' — — — — — — — — —2x-5 — — — — — — — — — — — 00 e TILED WALL GPT I d _ TUB BUILT-IN TWIN BUILT-INTWIN � -o. a O 00" SOAKER BUNK BEDS BUNK EDS Q p 3 38" x 75" 38" x 75" 009 DEPRESS III— ROOM Lu FOUNDATION AT x 21 -7 � _ W g � ---- 48" VNTY-31 HTS HANGING LIGH ___ _BUILT_IN — — — — — ---- a 7-d RAGS E DooR ° -,� VESSEL SINK LADDER OPENING -III w w �, 6 -101/2° 14 - 41/2" 3' -113/4 5-2„ II III III III III II- 27 -10" �, CLG BATHROOM I GUEST — �� �� 6'-5" x 10 -10 BEDROOM 2 8'soFFITABOVE �e R LEVEL �9 �__-� 11) BUNK BEDS TILE a ry __- V_ CPT J I9'-0" CLG °o INSET DOOR T orn ooa � ° e ALLOW FOR FULL SHLVS TILE TILE cP E o N w SWING 2'- 61/2" 2'- 5" 1' -11" 1' -11"5' 1' _ 2" :2'- HSS GOLUMN PER STRUGTU L INSET DOOR TO ALLOW cv til - FOR FULL SWING Q 1° BEAM LINE o N - - d 5'-103/4 a. e' a V q PROVIDE PORTS FOR 6 a MECHANIGAL VENTS AS NEEDED 0" STONE TYP g. �D. FR ° o D.S. FROM ABOVE l� a ry Z �n 4 WATER TABLE O LL D m — Lo BEAM LINE FULL 0" STONE 9 d VENEER FULL 0" STONE VENEER W®IE L; SQUARE GUT STONE GAP — THSD 1129 SF LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF 002 959 SF I 0" STONE O TYP w o01 w o02 w-ooa X Z 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 o w WATER TABLE X DETAIL W ZI 6' - 61/4" 6' - 61/4" 5- 10 3/4" 5' -1" _Z � 6' - 3" C) W_ D. FR LOWER PATIO STRUGTURAL COLUMNS m U PER STRUCTURAL Q w CONC. a m o FULL 0' STONE VENEER BEAM LINE l9 A N Z 0 Q 0 a o p(° Y Ln w z �9 J Z 3 a O SQUARE GUT STONE GAP 003 ° •d , -a . - - G 1/�2,'- SLAB. LEDSE . ° d a - - . . 1/')- -_TFN \A/rel ° a 'ATER TABLE � •a O 6'-3" o� BEAM LINE z 0 0 o r Z J � 3 0 1' 0 1 2" 0". GENERAL PLAN NOTES: - ALL WALLS TO BE BID AS 1/2" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 SMOOTH -SANDED FINISH. SEE BUILDER SPEGIFIGATIONS. - ALL CEILINGS TO BE BID AS 5/8" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH UNLESS NOTED. SEE BUILDER 5PEGIFIGATIONS. - G.G. TO COORDINATE DOOR THRESHOLD OPTIONS/SIZES AND SHOWER CURB HEIGHTS WITH OWNERS $_: DISCUSS A.D.A. AND MATERIALS. BID STANDARD SILLS AND THRESHOLDS. - ASSUME ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL.) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS. ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES �. SUMP LINES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR NET 8,: BLOWN CEILINGS. - STANDARD FORGED AIR HEATING AND COOLING, TYP. - CLOSET ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS TYPICAL, WITH ROD � SHELF IN ANY CLOSETS NOT SPECIFIED ON R.F.S.. - INSULATION R -VALUES, VAPOR RETARDERS, FOOTING DEPTHS, DRAIN TILE AND WATERPROOFING, DRAINAGE PLANES, FRAMING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND ROOF VENTILATION TO MEET OR EXCEED APPLICABLE GODE REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY WITH LOCAL INSPECTORS. CONSTRUCTION QUALITY TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH HIGH-END CUSTOM HOME CONSTRUCTION. - ON-SITE ENAMEL AND STAIN FINISHES RECOMMENDED. - BOXED -UP 545 WOOD BEAMS FROM 5/4 POPLAR ABOVE GREAT ROOM TO BE PAINTED - PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR OWNER REVIEW AND APPROVAL WATER TABLE FULL 0" STONE VENEER SQUARE GUT STONE GAP LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/411 = 1'-0'1 FINISHED FLOOR AREA Area Name 700 SF SPORT COURT 1129 SF LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF POOL 959 SF UPPER FINISHED 6331 SF O 2' 4' 8' WATER TABLE PLAN NORTH LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN sharra cles company 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 infoCOsharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN AS SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AT I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GOI`MPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER -.352-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE w 0 W W T W Ul Of m� 0 O U D N m ow Z 5 [[pull 0 Q � Z o v Z= 8 O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. N I 7-01/2' 3'- 2" 1 . 3'- 10 1/2' ROOF ABOVE ---- ------ I I I I w -,os I I 17 2x8 1 I 3 T G' -111/2" 1 . 6' -111/2' 1 A15 FULL 0' STONE VENEER W-104 3 SAUNA (PREFAB BY OWNER) I (0'-3"W x 53"D x 7-3"H) EXERCISE GIRDER TRUSS 21'-0" x 11'-4" L I — — — CPT 10'-4" CLG STEEL STAIRS WITH GAPPED ENDS AND STEEL HANDRAIL W/ GABLE RAIL SYSTEM UP '' II III I II I II I II I = II II II II II II II II II II TILII II _ JI IIII I I f f / IIII I I -JI1 H- - - - - - -- r1� I I lr 3'-0 -H1I1i iI III 1-------- I; II �; II II ,I I ,I Lam- �_-�-_ _= =J� I 1 I A14 I I W -,o6 1 1 931111rox I � z I ' I � I I I I I ROOF ABOVE �I I I I WATER TABLE I I f I I 01 2 1113/ 3-8114" 4'-33/4 4'-33/4' 2'-51/2 CPT CPT 112'- 0" Lj z VINYL o I� --POOL>�----�---- - o I 10'CLG Q iW� IZ BATH m L____ 61 I o, w-,35 I j " = 6 3 L_______J THSD W Z W w- o ------- _ ml 6'-6" x 9'-0" - a I I 0 z 7 A21 �'� � u i �I W I W i i O I m IN MA I W TILE I - I z I � X I�.uNDRY I I� STAIRS - - BASKET I �I H 11 OWL cv TowER na L-------� 3''Q CPT STORAGE 0� X�X m 2xG I \ U I °o ROOM �j m 10 A21 12 u1 `'� Z v ~� a0 IMEGH I MECHI 11 5-9 x 9-1 —J 9 0 t � Z } L____J L METAL HANDRAIL y CPT o DINING BACK DROP DESK \ I O Q O Q ROOM VESSEL SINK Q Q OL 3 W WITH STAINED o I L ® 4.0 VNTY �IJllJ TILE Z m 10 CLG „ „ - 3 o ENTRY Q w> I o9 w-,36 w-,37 (,IoE PANEL GAURD RAIL W J �— HIDDEN 14 -1 X 15 -9 - PWDR = I O' Q ,3 PANELED HDWD „ Q 9'-0" x 6'-7" � W W OL m o FOYER 6-0 x 6-7 A21 - HDWD / o I LL 0 0 < 6' - 2" DOOR O_ ----------------------------------- „ „ _ , 17 9 x 10'-0" 10'-6" CLG HDWD INTEGRATED POOL DOVER 11 10 CLG / I o ________________BELOW POOL DEGK 2 GUT STONE — — — — - HDWD 9 C G ----------------- ------------� COPING 2x10 „a ❑ O I U cfl I 7'-01/2" 1129 SF 23'-6' I MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF 15'-0" - 12-0" 33'-6" LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 r'IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ---FULL — — — — — — — — — — — — —— UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ------ ------------------------ o POOL DEPTH All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 _ I'OF WATER BUILDING SECTIONS A14 ~ A15 BUILDING DETAILS I I � A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS I NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES D I � I I I I I � I I I I I I GIRDER TRUSS I I I I I � I I I I I I w 10' x 20' INGROUND I I I F-1 r-1 I r-7 j p a o WATER LINE: j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b ° 0" BELOW POOL DEGK I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 2 18 15 A21 17 1 I 2 3 I I I I I I I IIIIiII IIIIIiII IIIIIII IIIIIiIIII I Al2 IIIiIIIIiI I I I IIIIIIiII I I I I I Ao I I I A13 POOL DEPTH I I TIMBER B ABOVE IiiiIIiIIIII SQUARE CUT T STONE GAP 10x10 TIMBER GOLUMN -- -- -101/2' 2" - 3" 4 01 6' IIIIIIIII - 3" 7-111/8 -0 7/8" 0" 0" 7 6' 01 6-0 01 G' 0" 01 8_0" 10 ROOF ABOVE COVERED A15 F FULL 6' STONE VENEER ENTRY - 2" 3'- 10" 1'-2"30'-11" ------------------ 14'-6" x 8'-6" L ------------ ------ -------- STAINED CONC. (NOT FLOATING) _ l9 _13_o ao L--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------ --- b I 10x10 TIMBE COLUMN I I 2 x10 I O _ DRIP IRRIGATION I I I I EQ I EQ ___ ___________ I D I I FULL O STONE I za sILAUNH coUNTERTOP cPr A21 2 =I .-. I I VENEEf II I I I w-� O TRAY G,EILING 11 3 H �� ---- --J a 11 LAUNDRY 0 11-2 x11-0 z °_ GLUCAN PER STRUGTU — — W IJ------ Lj z VINYL o I� --POOL>�----�---- - o I 10'CLG Q iW� IZ BATH m L____ 61 I o, w-,35 I j " = 6 3 L_______J THSD W Z W w- o ------- _ ml 6'-6" x 9'-0" - a I I 0 z 7 A21 �'� � u i �I W I W i i O I m IN MA I W TILE I - I z I � X I�.uNDRY I I� STAIRS - - BASKET I �I H 11 OWL cv TowER na L-------� 3''Q CPT STORAGE 0� X�X m 2xG I \ U I °o ROOM �j m 10 A21 12 u1 `'� Z v ~� a0 IMEGH I MECHI 11 5-9 x 9-1 —J 9 0 t � Z } L____J L METAL HANDRAIL y CPT o DINING BACK DROP DESK \ I O Q O Q ROOM VESSEL SINK Q Q OL 3 W WITH STAINED o I L ® 4.0 VNTY �IJllJ TILE Z m 10 CLG „ „ - 3 o ENTRY Q w> I o9 w-,36 w-,37 (,IoE PANEL GAURD RAIL W J �— HIDDEN 14 -1 X 15 -9 - PWDR = I O' Q ,3 PANELED HDWD „ Q 9'-0" x 6'-7" � W W OL m o FOYER 6-0 x 6-7 A21 - HDWD / o I LL 0 0 < 6' - 2" DOOR O_ ----------------------------------- „ „ _ , 17 9 x 10'-0" 10'-6" CLG HDWD INTEGRATED POOL DOVER 11 10 CLG / I o ________________BELOW POOL DEGK 2 GUT STONE — — — — - HDWD 9 C G ----------------- ------------� COPING 2x10 „a ❑ O I U cfl I SPORT COURT 1129 SF --------------� I MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF POOL - LENGTH STEP AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 r'IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ---FULL — — — — — — — — — — — — —— UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN o POOL DEPTH All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 _ I'OF WATER BUILDING SECTIONS A14 ~ A15 BUILDING DETAILS I INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS --- - - - - - NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES D I I I I I � I I I I I I GIRDER TRUSS I I I I I I I 24" FLOOR JST. I I I I I w 10' x 20' INGROUND I I I j GONGRETE POOL I j p a o WATER LINE: j b ° 0" BELOW POOL DEGK I I I I I 18 15 A21 17 I I 3 I I I 14 Al - I I I I I I I I on I I POOL DEPTH I I 5. OF WATER ` DRAIN�����`` --- - - - -`---��1 -- -- ®--- O I z Q ART WA_L-- < SLOPED a_ H„g 4 CAR I o CLG STEP IN CEILING A20 CK HALL CIAAB ABOVE CiD CLOSET GARAGE 2 2 HDWD -0 x 41-0 A24 10'CLG HDWD 33' MAIN LEVEL �I � I EPDXY OVER CONC. 12" DROPPED ° S.F. ELEV: ° 9' CLG BOX BEAM DN 18 R. 3 13'- 5" CLG L - - - - - ABOVE TO - _ _ - 964' - 0 3/4" _ _ _ ISLAND END CAP .SOLIDS T ry KITCHEN �W 6.H ,\---------------------------------------- - r----� ALIGN WITH 3'-0" x 8'-O" O N I\ 5 G.O.S. 0 —-GLULAM ABOVE PER STRUCTURAL COPING I I ICE 113'-0" x 21'-6" L m W ` VN, =3�,H - - - - - - - - - 10"MEGH. CHASE: o — I ,� m w 36 GARAGE HDWD o x o -5 C.os. - SLAB ELEV: UC frig I VLTD CLG m HALL 961'- 0" / I Q I I I 4 A21 v- 2, CPT ,22 o o o I z l I o 9' CLG W.I.C. o = 1 0) 0 10 m �' - CPT N KEYPAD A20 I v I I z GUEST 9' CLG o LOGK FOR I o I I BATH „2 POOL DOOR TOWN COUNTRY I I I m TILE z3 G.O.S. I W T042 GAS FIREPLACE I , I 4 4A20 9' CLG 2xG a O W/ RAISED HEARTH 4 6" I INDOOR 32'-n° ° o 9 A20 A20 3 I I A20 5 �g GARAGE N50E GLEAR O p POOL O HEATER � � �I � �� 11 FPL ---J 27'-0 x 36'-9" REG ROOM I I of a > I ro °; TILE FIREPLACE VENT ,- L_ � _ J � m X > 10'-6" CLG �A20�l LIVING o I 10'-0" CEILING ROOM 7� A2o - GUEST ABOVE POOL DECK 23'-0" x 25'-7" BEDROOM 1 SHOP BENCH ABOVE j INSET DOOR TO MEGH CHASE I W 7-91/2" Z W HDWD INSET GPT ALLOW FOR FULL 12'-5" X 13'-10" l9 I Z (SIZE T.B.D.) SWING CPT INS. MEGH CHASE J CD 13'-6" CLG Z / d�d m O INSET DOOR TO > 1 1' CLG r I m STAINED WOOD O I U.G. FRIG ALLOW FOR FULL I SWING TRIM cv J L------ 06 / BEAM LINE OEl GLULAM PER STRUGTURAL THSD — — — — — — — — — — — THSD w-na w -ng I ------ ------ 112 SOFFIT TO ALIGN z I �y w-,zo WITH BOTTOM OF 61 o w -n3 w-na w -ns w -n6 w -m L ---- - --- ----- —I I — 6'-0 ----- 6, 0, --- ----6 0,---- ------8, 0, ----- ---J i cn °C ROLL -UP SCREEN = a — — — — — — — — — - w 6' -1" 5- 10 3/4" 6' - 61/4" 6' - 61/4" 5' -10 3/4" 5' -1" 6 - 6' - 3" I 0" a l I� I GUEST DECK ROOF ABOVE 2 MAIN DECK EL -EV: -71/2' A14 24'-0" x 8' x 5" ROLL -UP SCREEN BEAM LINE ELEV: 903' -71/2" TREX DECKING W w I `° THSD 2x10 FULL 0" STONE VENEER TREX DECKING DRIP THROUGH Z z oz I DRIP THROUGH ~ 24'-O" x 8'-D" {--- METAL RAILING W/ ROOF ABOVE GLASS PANEL a 3 z D.S. FROM N Lz ---------- -------------------------------------- --- DECK ABOVEL J O \ FULL 0" STONE "' N Z-1 a W a VENEER DEGK ABOVE 05 o O 6 1 ww `O 1. „l 2.. 01 - � O i � � i � � SQUARE GUT I o POOL DECK o METAL RAILING W/ U STONE GAP m Z F W w QQ GLASS PANEL x w � z ELEV: 903' -71/2" a 3 0 I Z TREX DEGKING pL a n I a DRIP THROUGH IW z a METAL RAILING W/ � � ° i Cy GLASS PANEL Z E 3 SQUARE GUT O L ______ J L J " 1' 2" ' 0° STONE GAP SQUARE GUT SQUARE GUT 00 2 - 8" 1' 0" STONE GAP STONE GAP 14 01 3'-6' 24'-0" 2'-0.. 6 34'-0" 2'-0" 12 6" 2'-0" 32'-0" A15 GENERAL PLAN NOTES: - ALL WALLS TO BE BID AS 1/2" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 SMOOTH -SANDED FINISH. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - ALL CEILINGS TO BE BID AS 5/8" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH UNLESS NOTED. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - G.G. TO COORDINATE DOOR THRESHOLD OPTIONS/SIZES AND SHOWER CURB HEIGHTS WITH OWNERS $_: DISCUSS A.D.A. AND MATERIALS. BID STANDARD SILLS AND THRESHOLDS. - ASSUME ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL.) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPAGES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS. ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES � SUMP LINES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR NET $ BLOWN CEILINGS. - STANDARD FORGED AIR HEATING AND COOLING, TYP. - CLOSET ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS TYPICAL, WITH ROD � SHELF IN ANY CLOSETS NOT SPECIFIED ON R.F.S.. - INSULATION R -VALUES, VAPOR RETARDERS, FOOTING DEPTHS, DRAIN TILE AND WATERPROOFING, DRAINAGE PLANES, FRAMING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND ROOF VENTILATION TO MEET OR EXCEED APPLICABLE GODE REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY WITH LOCAL INSPECTORS. CONSTRUCTION QUALITY TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH HIGH-END GUSTOM HOME CONSTRUCTION. -DROP ALL TILE SUB -FLOORS 11/2" FOR MUD BED - ON-51TE ENAMEL AND STAIN FINISHES REGOMI"IENDED. - BOXED -UP 545 WOOD BEAMS FROM 5/4 POPLAR ABOVE GREAT ROOM TO BE PAINTED - PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR OWNER REVIEW AND APPROVAL MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/411 = 1'-01' FINISHED FLOOR AREA Area Name 700 SF SPORT COURT 1129 SF LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF POOL 959 SF UPPER FINISHED 6331 SF PLAN NORTH O 2 4' 8' � 1 H = N "21MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN A7 sharra ciesi company` 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN ,� SPORT GouRT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 r'IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GOI`1PANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL- ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 w-1 Of m Ci O U D p�L N( m (f) OW Z 5 [[puLu 0 Z 0 Q N Z O Z= u OC O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF .SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 20,6 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. FA BE (7CI14C15111_ F'L^114 114LJ I C=: - ALL WALLS TO BE BID AS 1/2" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 SMOOTH -SANDED FINISH. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - ALL CEILINGS TO BE BID AS 5/8" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH UNLESS NOTED. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - G.G. TO COORDINATE DOOR THRESHOLD OPTIONS/SIZES AND SHOWER CURB HEIGHTS WITH OWNERS $_: DISCUSS A.D.A. AND MATERIALS. BID STANDARD SILLS AND THRESHOLDS. - ASSUME ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL.) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS. ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES �. SUMP LINES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR NET 8': BLOWN CEILINGS. - STANDARD FORCED AIR HEATING AND COOLING, TYP. - CLOSET ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS TYPICAL, WITH ROD � SHELF IN ANY CLOSETS NOT SPECIFIED ON R.F.S.. - INSULATION R -VALUES, VAPOR RETARDERS, FOOTING DEPTHS, DRAIN TILE AND WATERPROOFING, DRAINAGE PLANES, FRAMING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND ROOF VENTILATION TO MEET OR EXCEED APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY WITH LOCAL INSPECTORS. CONSTRUCTION QUALITY TO BE COMMENSURATE WITH HIGH-END CUSTOM HOME CONSTRUCTION. -DROP ALL TILE SUB -FLOORS 11/2" FOR MUD BED - ON-SITE ENAMEL AND STAIN FINISHES RECOMMENDED. - BOXED -UP 545 WOOD BEAMS FROM 5/4 POPLAR ABOVE GREAT ROOM TO BE PAINTED - PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR OWNER REVIEW AND APPROVAL FINISHED FLOOR AREA Area -T Name 700 SF SPORT COURT 1129 SF LOWER FINISHED 2150 SF MAIN FLOOR FINISHED 1393 SF POOL 959 SF UPPER FINISHED 6331 SF METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF BELOW 2�UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN sharra ClIes company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 W W � Of -1 m� 0 o D (Y N m R_ Z 5 ([pill �U ZOL 0 Q Z o Z= 8 O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. A14 3 T 1 Al2 J GENERAL PLAN NOTES: - ALL WALLS TO BE BID AS 1/2" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 SMOOTH -SANDED FINISH. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - ALL CEILINGS TO BE BID AS 5/8" DRYWALL WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH UNLESS NOTED. SEE BUILDER SPECIFICATIONS. - G.G. TO COORDINATE DOOR THRESHOLD OPTIONS/SIZES AND SHOWER CURB HEIGHTS WITH OWNERS $-: DISCUSS A.D.A. AND MATERIALS. BID STANDARD SILLS AND THRESHOLDS. - ASSUME ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL.) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS. ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES �. SUMP LINES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR NET 8': BLOWN CEILINGS. - STANDARD FORCED AIR HEATING AND COOLING, TYP. - CLOSET ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS TYPICAL, WITH ROD � SHELF IN ANY CLOSETS NOT SPECIFIED ON R.F.S.. - INSULATION R -VALUES, VAPOR RETARDERS, FOOTING DEPTHS, DRAIN TILE AND WATERPROOFING, DRAINAGE PLANES, FRAMING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, AND ROOF VENTILATION TO MEET OR EXCEED APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY WITH LOCAL INSPECTORS. CONSTRUCTION QUALITY TO BF- COMMENSURATE ECOMMENSURATE WITH HIGH-END CUSTOM HOME CONSTRUCTION. - ON-SITE ENAMEL AND STAIN FINISHES RECOMMENDED. - BOXED -UP 545 WOOD BEAMS FROM 5/4 POPLAR ABOVE GREAT ROOM TO BE PAINTED - PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR OWNER REVIEW AND APPROVAL r1-*`\R00F PLAN 0 2' 4' 8' sharra ClIes company 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al GOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A5 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AT I IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3 ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL- ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - -952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 W W � Of -1 m� 0 o D (Y N m R- Z 5 ([pill �U ZOL 0 Q Z o Z= 8 O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2G25 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. 2 1 2 2 1 A13 A13 Al2 A15 Al2 „ 2 3"/ 12„ _ 21 - - - - 12" STONE LINTEL - -- ter—T1,4 - 20 __-_1 (W2211108 W-209 �� - - - - 4 20_- w-zo, w-2oz w-ao3 \ ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT / I- 0) k 0 I` 1 1 VERSION - (SEE Al2 FOP, FULL VERSION): MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 9961-611 _ MEDIAN HEIGHT � 989'- 3 3/8" V UPPER LEVEL T.P. -- 985'-0" V E" STONE SILL O UPPER LEV�EL6S.F MAIN LEVEL T.P. FI _ _ _ /�\F-]I � . W_124 . \' "2� W-126 W-127 12" STONE LINTEL _ 12" STONE LI TEL. 12STONE LINTEL VIVVV "'u W_,28 W_,29 14 — — 6" STONE SILL " il���11 .■� ��� W-103 W-104\ / AITCH ITECT ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT W-135 I- 0) k 0 I` 1 1 VERSION - (SEE Al2 FOP, FULL VERSION): 4-04- SEC;OND ST -SUITE 100 OL O I / /1 il���11 .■� ��� ®—® INE �_�: � �� ��® ■off \ /W-102 W-103 W-104\ / AITCH ITECT ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT W-135 I- 0) k 0 I` 1 1 VERSION - (SEE Al2 FOP, FULL VERSION): 4-04- SEC;OND ST -SUITE 100 OL O I / /1 1. CHIMNEY. PRE -FINISHED METAL GAP, SIDING (SEE TYPE 1 BELOW), AND REGLET FLASHINGS CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN OVER UNDERLAYMENT AND SHEATHING AS RECOMMENDED BY SIDING MANUFACTURER. / I PREFINISHED METAL FLUE TERMINATIONS BY FIREPLACE SUPPLIERS. STRUCTUPAL ENGINEER 2. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT (WITH BAFFLE) TO EXTEND FULL LENGTH OF RIDGE, WITH PREFINISHED METAL RIDGE GAP MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF DECK. ®—® INE �_�: � �� ��® ■off \ /W-102 W-103 W-104\ / AITCH ITECT ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT W N m I _ HIGHEST EXST. 966' - 6" 6" STONE SILL - - - I 6" STONE GAP 7 1 2" - 13 MAIN LEVEL S.F. 20 13 13 _ LOWER LEVEL T.P. AIL 962' - p.. - - - SII - - AF GARAGE SLAB n 961'-0" 0 I I I I I I I .III. I III. .III. I III I- .III III III I_ III III I ..III- III III I -III- III I II -III- III I III -III- I III III -III- III III I_ III III III I_ III ..III- III III III III LOWER LEVEL -III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III I 953'-p.. mi SP COURT ORT SLAB 945'- 0" 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 0 4' 81 v A14 0 II III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III I ' -o 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 0 2' 4: 8' 10 1 /4" = 1'-0" MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 996'- 6" MEDIAN HEIGHT 989'- 3 3/8" 'PER LEVEL T.P. � 985' - 00"" 1 'PER LEVEL S.F. Ln 976' 66"" I Il; N MAIN LEVEL T.P._® 974'- 5 1/4 -MAIN LEVEL S.F. 964'- 0 3/4" LOWER LEVEL T.P., -- n,� 1 961'-0 LOWER LEVEL 953'-0" SPORT COURT _645'- SLAB 95' - 0" V 1/4" = 1'-01, sharra 4d4es company` 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN /4-13 ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES OR EQ.) WITH FLATLOCK WALL PANELS AT 7,12" AND 10'.MIECHANICALLY FASTENED WITH GONCEALED FASTENERS. 11. METAL SIDING TYPE 2: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (METALTECH-USA ELZINC GRAPHITE OR Ea.) WITH INTERLOCKING, VERTICAL REVEAL JOINTS WITH APPROX. 1" REVEALS, MECHANIGALLY FASTENED WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. REVEAL 5PAGING AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 12. STUCCO SIDING - 3 -GOAT PORTLAND GEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM OVER SELF -FURRING, CORROSION -RESISTANT, EXPANDED METAL LATH AND FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BID MTI SURE GAVITY) WITH WEEP SCREED AND SCREED DEFLEGTOR. 13. FOUNDATION INSULATION PROTECTION - STUCCO WITH STUCCO GAP (MATCH STUCCO SIDING APPEARANCE, TEXTURE AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS) AT TYPICAL CONDITIONS. AT STONE, APPLY NATURAL STONE VENEER DOWN BELOW FINAL GRADE, SEE SECTIONS. 14. EXTERIOR BEAMS AND BRACKETS TO BE FROM SOLID TIMBERS OR BUILT-UP FROM 545 A $_: BETTER WESTERN RED CEDAR TO RESEMBLE SOLID TIMBERS. FLASHINGS ON ALL EXPOSED HORIZONTAL BEAM $_: BRACKET SURFACES. WIRE BRUSH $_: BID 51KKENS STD 1 -GOAT., 15. WINDOWS: BID MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOWS WITH NATURAL WOOD INTERIORS. SEE ELEVATIONS, Al GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES, WALL CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM DETAILS, AND DETAILS IN THIS DRAWING SET FOR FLASHING AND INSTALLATION NOTES. 16. TYPICAL WINDOW 6,: PATIO DOOR TRIM: SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, AT METAL SIDING, WINDOW TRIM TO BE METAL TO MATCH METAL SIDING WITH METAL RETURNS BAGK TO WINDOW. AT STUCCO, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STUCCO RETURNS. AT STONE, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STONE RETURNS TO MATCH BODY STONE, WITH GUT LIMESTONE SILLS - SILLS TO HAVE SLOPED TOPS TO DRAIN, AND DRIP KERFS ALONG BOTTOM EDGES. 17. FRONT DOOR 21/4" THICK, METAL, FULL -VIEW ENTRY DOOR. 18. GARAGE DOORS: INSULATED, PAINTED, FLUSH -PANEL DOORS WITH ELEG. OPENERS. 19. EXTERIOR COLUMNS: VENTED WOOD COLUMN BUILT-UP FROM 2x D �t BETTER, 545, WEST. RED CEDAR WITH LOCK -MITERED CORNERS AND SCARF JOINTS.. 20. NATURAL STONE VENEER: NATURAL STONE VENEER OVER FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIC) MTI SURE CAVITY WITH WEEPS AS RE,00). FOR BID, ASSUME CHILTON BLEND LEDGE STONE ISSUE DATE PROJECT TEAM w Z w y AITCH ITECT ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT W N m I- 0) k 0 SHARRATT DE51ON � COMPANY VERSION - (SEE Al2 FOP, FULL VERSION): 4-04- SEC;OND ST -SUITE 100 OL O EXCELSIOR, MN 5331 1. CHIMNEY. PRE -FINISHED METAL GAP, SIDING (SEE TYPE 1 BELOW), AND REGLET FLASHINGS CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN OVER UNDERLAYMENT AND SHEATHING AS RECOMMENDED BY SIDING MANUFACTURER. X PREFINISHED METAL FLUE TERMINATIONS BY FIREPLACE SUPPLIERS. STRUCTUPAL ENGINEER 2. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT (WITH BAFFLE) TO EXTEND FULL LENGTH OF RIDGE, WITH PREFINISHED METAL RIDGE GAP MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF DECK. WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 3. SNOW RETENTION SYSTEM: ALUMINUM RAIL WITH METAL EDGE TO MATCH ROOF DOLOR OVER DOORS, GARAGE DOORS, DECKS, AND PORCHES. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH 4. PREFINISHED METAL ROOFING: 17" WIDE, GALVANIZED STEEL, SNAP -SEAMED ROOFING BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 (MCELROY METAL MAXIMA PANEL OR EQUAL), STRIATED PAN, 13/4" MIN. HEIGHT SEAMS, WITH STEVE RIVARD - CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. _952-888-051G 5. PREFINISHED METAL FLASHINGS TO MATCH SIDING FOR METAL COMPATIBILITY AND OENEPAL GONTI,ACTOR UNIFORM APPEARANGE, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO WALL AND ROOF SHEATHING WITH CONCEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. 0. FLAT (LOW SLOPE) ROOFS: 00 MIL. EPDM MEMBRANE, FULLY ADHERED TO ROOF DECK. JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 7. NOT USED 4300 LINCOLN DRIVE 8. ROOF EDGE TRIM I$ SOFFITS (SEE DETAILS): PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE, METAL- EDINA, MN 55430 GLAD FASCA, OVER 2x SUBFASGA. SOFFITS TO BE 1x0, D$BETTER, V -GROOVE WESTERN RED GEDAR WITH CONTINUOUS VENT (TRIM VENT AS REQUIRED). INSTALL VENT PARALLEL TO JEFF KRAEMER - 352-335-3100 FASCIA AND MITER -GUT GORNERS. BID 1 GOAT 51KKEN STD ON SOFFITS. 9. EXTERIOR CEILINGS - MATGH TYPICAL SOFFITS. ISSUED FOP, 10. METAL SIDING TYPE 1: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (METALTEGH-USA El ZING GRAPHITE OR EQ.) WITH FLATLOCK WALL PANELS AT 7,12" AND 10'.MIECHANICALLY FASTENED WITH GONCEALED FASTENERS. 11. METAL SIDING TYPE 2: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (METALTECH-USA ELZINC GRAPHITE OR Ea.) WITH INTERLOCKING, VERTICAL REVEAL JOINTS WITH APPROX. 1" REVEALS, MECHANIGALLY FASTENED WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. REVEAL 5PAGING AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 12. STUCCO SIDING - 3 -GOAT PORTLAND GEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM OVER SELF -FURRING, CORROSION -RESISTANT, EXPANDED METAL LATH AND FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BID MTI SURE GAVITY) WITH WEEP SCREED AND SCREED DEFLEGTOR. 13. FOUNDATION INSULATION PROTECTION - STUCCO WITH STUCCO GAP (MATCH STUCCO SIDING APPEARANCE, TEXTURE AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS) AT TYPICAL CONDITIONS. AT STONE, APPLY NATURAL STONE VENEER DOWN BELOW FINAL GRADE, SEE SECTIONS. 14. EXTERIOR BEAMS AND BRACKETS TO BE FROM SOLID TIMBERS OR BUILT-UP FROM 545 A $_: BETTER WESTERN RED CEDAR TO RESEMBLE SOLID TIMBERS. FLASHINGS ON ALL EXPOSED HORIZONTAL BEAM $_: BRACKET SURFACES. WIRE BRUSH $_: BID 51KKENS STD 1 -GOAT., 15. WINDOWS: BID MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOWS WITH NATURAL WOOD INTERIORS. SEE ELEVATIONS, Al GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES, WALL CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM DETAILS, AND DETAILS IN THIS DRAWING SET FOR FLASHING AND INSTALLATION NOTES. 16. TYPICAL WINDOW 6,: PATIO DOOR TRIM: SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, AT METAL SIDING, WINDOW TRIM TO BE METAL TO MATCH METAL SIDING WITH METAL RETURNS BAGK TO WINDOW. AT STUCCO, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STUCCO RETURNS. AT STONE, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STONE RETURNS TO MATCH BODY STONE, WITH GUT LIMESTONE SILLS - SILLS TO HAVE SLOPED TOPS TO DRAIN, AND DRIP KERFS ALONG BOTTOM EDGES. 17. FRONT DOOR 21/4" THICK, METAL, FULL -VIEW ENTRY DOOR. 18. GARAGE DOORS: INSULATED, PAINTED, FLUSH -PANEL DOORS WITH ELEG. OPENERS. 19. EXTERIOR COLUMNS: VENTED WOOD COLUMN BUILT-UP FROM 2x D �t BETTER, 545, WEST. RED CEDAR WITH LOCK -MITERED CORNERS AND SCARF JOINTS.. 20. NATURAL STONE VENEER: NATURAL STONE VENEER OVER FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIC) MTI SURE CAVITY WITH WEEPS AS RE,00). FOR BID, ASSUME CHILTON BLEND LEDGE STONE ISSUE DATE v w 0 w Z w y SL Of Q m ci U D U W N m I- 0) k 0 2 5 [[pull 0 Z n Q Z O v Q�L r Z= OL O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X 21. NATURAL STONE WINDOW SILLS AND STONE GAPS: GUT LIMESTONE IN THICKNESSES PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: AND SIZES AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS (VERIFY 5PEGIF-3 WITH OWNERS). 22. ENTRY PORCH FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE, STAINED. 23. DECKS -1x TREX OVER SLEEPER SYSTEM, OVER SLOPED EPDM ROOFING, HENNEN 24. EXTERIOR RAILINGS: SEE DRAWINGS - RE -USE OWNERS' EXISTING RAILING GLASS SET INTO A CUSTOM STAINLESS STEEL HORIZONTAL GAP AND VERTIGALS. HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET A10 LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 996'- 6" MEDIAN HEIGHT - - - - - 989'- 3 3/8" UPPER LEVEL T.P. 985'- 0" 'PER LEVEL S.F. 976'- 6' RAIN LEVEL T.P. 974' - 5 1 /4" HIGHEST EXST. GRADE 966'- 6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. 964' - 0 3/4" LOWER LEVEL T.P. 961'-0 LOWER LE -E�1� - - - - - - - - - --- �I-��1�- - - VEL = - 3 - 953' - O° ME ME LEI —111 LIII II IIIIII - o Footing _ ! 949 0 _ SPORT COURT III— III— SLAB - I- 945 0 II II III III III III III III III III III III III III III I I III III II I I III III III—III III III III—III III III III1 I I �L�I I I III III III III III—III III III III—III I I � IIII III III III III I I I� III III1 I I III I ISI I I1 I I III III III—III J I III I 1I- s2ri%`NPROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 0 2 4' 8 sharra 4d4es company` 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES A14 A14 A14 11 1/411 — 11-011 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT09L PROJECT TEAM 9961-611 ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GOI`MPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 2 ELEVATION/SECTION KEY NOTES - SHORT EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN 4 MEDIAN HEIGHT VERSION - (SEE Al2 FOR FULL VERSION): STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 989'-33/8" JF 1. CHIMNEY: PRE -FINISHED METAL CAP, SIDING (SEE TYPE 1 BELOW), AND REGLET FLASHINGS OVER UNDERLAYMENT AND SHEATHING AS RECOMMENDED BY SIDING MANUFACTURER. WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. PREFINISHED METAL FLUE TERMINATIONS BY FIREPLACE SUPPLIERS. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH 2. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT (WITH BAFFLE) TO EXTEND FULL LENGTH OF RIDGE, WITH PREFINISHED METAL RIDGE GAP MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF DECK. BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 UPPER LEVEL T.P. L , 3. SNOW RETENTION SYSTEM: ALUMINUM RAIL WITH METAL EDGE TO MATCH ROOF COLOR STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 985'- 0" OVER DOORS, GARAGE DOORS, DEGK5, AND PORCHES. 4. PREFINISHED METAL ROOFING: 17" WIDE, GALVANIZED STEEL, SNAP -SEAMED ROOFINGGENERAL CONTRACTOR (MGELROY METAL MAXIMA PANEL OR EQUAL), STRIATED PAN, 13/4" MIN. HEIGHT SEAMS, WITH 14 CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC ' 6 5. PREFINISHED METAL FLASHINGS TO MATCH SIDING FOR METAL GOMPATIBILITY AND _ w-2aa w-aos w -2o6 p i O O UNIFORM APPEARANCE, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO WALL AND ROOF SHEATHING WITH 4300 LINCOLN DRIVE CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. EDINA, MN 55430 202 � m ro. FLAT (LOW SLOPE) ROOFS: 00 MIL EPDM MEMBRANE, FULLY ADHERED TO ROOF DECK. JEFF KRAEMER - 352-335-3100 5 7. NOT USED 8. ROOF EDGE TRIM � SOFFITS (SEE DETAILS): PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE, METAL- /� 112" w — _ - _ - = — b GLAD FASCIA, OVER 2x 5UBFA5GIA. SOFFITS TO BE 1x0, D$_:BETTER, V -GROOVE WESTERN RED Issu FOR � HIGHEST EXST. �L w U Z L-1 Of Q <M 0 O U D U (YN 'a-) W m \ W-106 --------------------- W-107 W-108 / � Z O Q�L r Z= 8 -UPPER LEVEL S.F� _4%976' - 6" MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 1/4" - - - GRADE cli MAIN LEVEL S.F. 1- 0 3/4-1 _ o LOWER LEVEL T.P. - _ 962'- p„ — w o LOWER LEVEL 953' - 0" I SPORT COURT SLAB II II I II I II 945 -011 II I I �� II II II 111 III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III � III. III II � -III- I III .III. I I � III III II II III III III_ 3 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 0 2' 4' 8' 11 1/411 = 1'-0'1 cv Ln CEDAR WITH CONTINUOUS VENT (TRIM VENT AS REQUIRED). INSTALL VENT PARALLEL TO FASCIA AND MITER -GUT CORNERS. BID 1 GOAT SIKKEN STD ON SOFFITS. 9. EXTERIOR CEILINGS - MATCH TYPICAL SOFFITS. 10. METAL SIDING TYPE 1: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (I" IETALTEGH-USA ELZING GRAPHITE OR EQ.) WITH FLATLOGK WALL PANELS AT 7,12" AND 10".MEGHANIGALLY FASTENED WITH CONGEALED FASTENERS. 11. METAL SIDING TYPE 2: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (rETALTECH-USA El ZING GRAPHITE OR EQ,) WITH INTERLOCKING, VERTICAL REVEAL JOINTS WITH APPROX. 1" REVEALS, MECHANICALLY FASTENED WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM. REVEAL SPACING AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 12. STUCCO SIDING - 3 -GOAT PORTLAND GEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM OVER SELF -FURRING, CORROSION -RESISTANT, EXPANDED METAL LATH AND FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIC) MTI SURE CAVITY) WITH WEEP SCREED AND SCREED DEFLECTOR. 13. FOUNDATION INSULATION PROTECTION - STUCCO WITH STUCCO CAP (MATCH STUCCO 51DING APPEARANCE, TEXTURE AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS) AT TYPICAL CONDITIONS. AT STONE, APPLY NATURAL STONE VENEER DOWN BELOW FINAL GRADE, SEE SECTIONS. 14. EXTERIOR BEAMS AND BRACKETS TO BE FROM SOLID TIMBERS OR BUILT-UP FROM 54S A 8. BETTER WESTERN RED CEDAR TO RESEMBLE SOLID TIMBERS. FLASHINGS ON ALL EXPOSED HORIZONTAL BEAM 8,: BRACKET SURFACES. WIRE BRUSH 8,: BID SIKKENS STD 1 -GOAT.. 15. WINDOWS: BID MARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOWS WITH NATURAL WOOD INTERIORS. SEE ELEVATIONS, Al GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES, WALL CAVITY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM DETAILS, AND DETAILS IN THIS DRAWING SET FOR FLASHING AND INSTALLATION NOTES. 16. TYPICAL WINDOW I$ PATIO DOOR TRIM: SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. AT METAL SIDING, WINDOW TRIM TO BE METAL TO MATCH METAL SIDING WITH METAL RETURNS BACK TO WINDOW. AT STUCCO, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STUCCO RETURNS. AT STONE, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STONE RETURNS TO MATCH BODY STONE, WITH GUT LIMESTONE SILLS - SILLS TO HAVE SLOPED TOPS TO DRAIN, AND DRIP KERFS ALONG BOTTOM EDGES. 17. FRONT DOOR: 21/4" THICK, METAL, FULL -VIEW ENTRY DOOR. 18. GARAGE DOORS: INSULATED, PAINTED, FLUSH -PANEL DOORS WITH ELEG. OPENERS. 19. EXTERIOR COLUMNS: VENTED WOOD COLUMN BUILT-UP FROM 2x D � BETTER, 545, ISSUE DATE �L w U Z L-1 Of Q <M 0 O U D U (YN 'a-) W m ow Z 5 [[pull Z Q � Z O Q�L r Z= 8 et O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X WEST. RED CEDAR WITH LOCK -MITERED CORNERS AND SCARF JOINTS.. 20. NATURAL STONE VENEER: NATURAL STONE VENEER OVER FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BID MTI SURE CAVITY WITH WEEPS AS REa-D). FOR BID, ASSUME C HILTON BLEND LEDGE STONE. 21. NATURAL STONE WINDOW SILLS AND STONE GAPS: GUT LIMESTONE IN THICKNESSES HENNEN AND SIZES AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS (VERIFY SPECIES WITH OWNERS). 22. ENTRY PORCH FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE, STAINED. 23. DECKS - lx TREX OVER SLEEPER SYSTEM, OVER SLOPED EPDM ROOFING. 24. EXTERIOR RAILINGS: SEE DRAWINGS - RE -USE OWNERS' EXISTING RAILING GLASS SET HOME INTO A GU5TOM STAINLESS STEEL HORIZONTAL CAP AND VERTICALS. 225 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. G COPYRIGHT 20,6 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. 2" THIN GUT STONE ABOVE WINDOW OPENINGS 2 3 1 A14 A14 A14 IIIIIIIIIII I I I !illlllllllllllllllllllllll _ III�III�I �ISI�� TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER STRUCTURAL STEEL DRYWALL CEILING -7 BRACKET WITH WOOD BOX = -- I TO FOLLOW TRUSS PROFILE -� BEAM AND SUPPORT _ L- 6 - `-� 2'-831 4 cv F._ I 967'- 4 3/4" - � I — 1;;7 TIMBER COLUMNS LIVING - AND BEAM WITH ROOM FOYER = BOLTED METAL PLATE AND STRAP —\ I FIREPLACE HDWD / �- HDWD = CONNECTIONS 963'- 7 1/2"-- _- n�l_ 963'-61/2°------------ - MAIN LEVEL S.F. FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL I TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN TL- 0 964' - 0 3/4�� LOWER LEVEL T.P. - BY TRUSS SUPPLIER L- �� 5 -7 962'_ 0 L--7 - _ _ Q - / T- L-� - a a �o - - - - -- - -- a - _ J REC ROOM J CPTE —6�F� FIREPLACE J _J J �- LOWER LEVEL II0� I I III I I I 1= SPORT COURT SLAB III II I 945 II II I � II I III III III III III III III II III III III III III I I J I III III III MEDIAN HEIGHT 989'- 3 3/8" zzUPPER LEVEL T.P. UPPER LEVEL T.P. 985'- 0" PPER LEVEL _S.F. 976'- 6" J MAIN LEVEL T.P. 9741- 5 1 /4" �! THIN GUT STONE ri-NNBUILDING SECTION 01 \4A12 1/411 = 1'-011 1 3 A14 A14 TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER THIN GUT STONE UPPER LEVEL S.F. 976'- 6" V 1'"WW7--x 77 MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 114' dl DINING:" -II - / - - - - - _ ROOM — -P==FT- rF-1 -' - _ MAIN LEVEL S.F. TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN 964' - 0 3/4" �I BY TRUSS SUPPLIER FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL ---� LOWER LEVEL T.P. - - �- _ 962' - 0" 177F GUEST REC ROOM - - BEDROOM 2 006' - _ - - - - - — LOWER LEVEL 953'- 0" I III III III- I11 I III III III I I II II ` O O = SPORT COURT 0 O 0HA —��—��� - III III I11 III III III III III III _ 2 BUILDING SECTION 02 III III III III Al2 1/4 = 1'-0"I III III III -III III ELEVATION/SEGTION KEY NOTES (FULL VERSION): �L W U s n a r r `` U1 Of a M 4desENT w�() N( m GEMENT, MINERAL PIGMENTS AND 51LICA SAND MIXED $-: APPLIED TO DASH GOAT. 1. CHIMNEY: PRE -FINISHED METAL SIDING (SEE TYPE 2 SIDING NOTES BELOW) OVER UNDERLAYM 13. FOUNDATION INSULATION PROTECTION - STUCCO WITH STUCCO GAP (MATGH STUCCO SIDING � 'j AND SHEATHING AS RECOMMM ENDED BY SIDING ANUFAGTURER, OVER WOOD FRAMING. USE WEEP company is SCREED AND SGREED DEFLEGTORS PER MANUFAGTURER INSTRUCTIONS. GHIMNEY GAP TO BE PREFINISHED METAL TO MATGH TYPE 2 SIDING W/ TOP SLOPED TO DRAIN AND DRIP EDGES. X PREFINISHED METAL FLUE TERMINATIONS BY FIREPLACE SUPPLIERS. PREFINISHED METAL REGLET FLASHING AT AREAS ADJOINING ROOFS AND ADJACENT SIDING (SEE FLASHING NOTES BELOW). 2. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT (WITH BAFFLE) TO EXTEND FULL LENGTH OF RIDGE, WITH PREFINISHED 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 METAL RIDGE GAP MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO ROOF DECK. RIDGE GAP TO MATGH ROOFING FOR SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 METAL GOMPATIBILITY AND UNIFORM APPEARANCE. EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com 3. SNOW RETENTION SYSTEM OVER ALL GARAGE DOORS, ENTRY DOORS, DECKS, AND AS COORDINATED WITH OWNERS. SNOW RAIL TO MATGH ROOF APPEARANCE. SHEET INDEX 4. PREFINISHED METAL ROOFING: 17" WIDE, GALVANIZED STEEL, SNAP -SEAMED ROOFING ("GELROY METAL MAXIMA PANEL OR EQUAL), STRIATED PAN, 13/4" MIN. HEIGHT SEAMS, "ECHANIGALLY FASTENED TO ROOF DECK PER MANUFAGTURER INSTRUCTIONS WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM, WITH MIN. Al DOVER SWEET PITCH OF 3/12. MANUFAGTER SUPPLIED FINISH TO BE KYNAR FLUOROPOLYMER OR EQUAL IN STANDARD A2 SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL COLOR. INSTALL ROOFING OVER HIGH -TEMP GE 8,: WATER PROTECTION MEMBRANE (GRAGE OR EQUAL) WITH HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED OR ELEGTRO-GALVANIZED FASTENERS. A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE 5. PREFINISHED METAL FLASHINGS TO MATGH SIDING FOR METAL GO"PATIBILITYAND UNIFORM A4 FOUNDATION PLAN APPEARANCE, MECHANICALLY FASTENED TO WALL AND ROOF SHEATHING. EXTEND FLASHING 12" UP ADJACENT VERTICAL SURFACE AND LAP BUILDING PAPER AND SIDING OVER FLASHINGS. p5 SPORT COURT PLAN SIDING WITH, 0" FLAT METAL BASE TRIM 1" PROUD OF SIDING, USE CONGEALED FASTENERS AND LAP AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0. FLAT (LOW SLOPE) ROOFS: 000 MIL. EPDM MEMBRANE, FULLY ADHERED TO ROOF DECK. RUBBER FLASHINGS TO BE 1/10" THICK MIN. BONDING ADHESIVE AND SEAMING GEMENT BY EPDM AT I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MANUFAGTURER. SLOPE ALL ROOFS (1/4" PER 12" MIN.) TOWARDS GUTTERS AND SCUPPERS, SEE ROOF PLAN. AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 17. FRONT DOOR: 21/4" THICK ENTRY DOOR AS SUPPLIED BY "ARVIN WINDOWS - VERIFY DOOR ROOF PLAN 7. NOT USED SHARRATT DESIGN � GO"PANY PREFINISHED METAL CASINGS AROUND FRONT DOOR TO MATGH "ARVIN FRAME FINISH. AlO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8. ROOF EDGE TRIM � SOFFITS (SEE DETAILS): 4004 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 - PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE INSTALLED AS PART OF ROOFING INSTALLATION. All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - METAL FASCIA GLADING WITH BOTTOM RETURN AND DRIP EDGE - SEE TYPICAL WALL SECTIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS - 2xSUBFASGIA - SOFFITS TO BE 1x0, 136BETTER, V -GROOVE WESTERN RED CEDAR WITH CONTINUOUS SOFFIT VENT (TRIM A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS VENT AS REQUIRED). INSTALL VENT PARALLEL TO FASCIA AND MITER -GUT CORNERS. BID 1 GOAT 19. EXTERIOR COLUMNS: VENTED WOOD GOLU"N BUILT-UP FROM 2x D � BETTER, 545, WEST. RED SIKKEN STD ON SOFFITS - OWNERS TO APPROVE COLOR. SEE ALTERNATES. A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS - NO FRIEZE BOARDS - SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR WINDOW AND SIDING TERMINATIONS. SIMILAR TO DRAWINGS TO RESE"BLE SOLID TIMBER POSTS. WIRE BRUSH TO BRING OUT GRAIN. BID WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. A15 BUILDING DETAILS 9. EXTERIOR CEILINGS - FRONT PORCH AND ABOVE BACK DECKS: 1x0 D8,BETTER TSG V -GROOVE CEDAR A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS WITH 1 GOAT SIKKEN STD TO MATGH TYPICAL SOFFITS. 20. NATURAL STONE VENEER: FULL -DEPTH (THIN VENEERS WHERE NOTED) NATURAL STONE VENEER A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 10. METAL SIDING TYPE 1: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (METALTECH-USA ELZING GRAPHITE OR EQ.) WITH OWNER TO APPROVE FULL-SCALE MORTARED STONE MOCKUP WITH GAP ON SITE PRIOR TO ORDER OF FLATLOGK WALL PANELS AT 7, 12" AND 10". MEGHANIGALLY FASTEN TO WALL SIDING PER A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM, WITH DRIPS, CLIPS, SUPPORT A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS ANGLES, GAPS, AND REVEALS AS REDO""ENDED TO ALLOW MOISTURE TO DRAIN TO EXTERIOR - ALL AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS (VERIFY SPECIES WITH OWNERS). WHERE INDICATED, LINTELS TO PROJECT OPENINGS TO DRAIN CAVITY TO BE SEALED WITH INSECT SCREEN OR INSECT BARRIER. INSTALL A24 SGHEDULES SIDING OVER SHEATHING AND UNDERLAY"ENT PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS, WITH STAINLESS 1" PROUD OF BODY STONE. WINDOW SILLS TO PRO -JF -GT 2" PROUD OF BODY STONE. FASTENERS IN SLOTTED FASTENER POINTS TO ALLOW MOVEMENT. 11. METAL SIDING TYPE 2: PRE -FINISHED METAL PANEL (METALTEGH-USA El ZING GRAPHITE OR EQ.) WITH 22. ENTRY PORCH FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE, STAINED. INTERLOGKING REVEAL JOINTS WITH APPROX. 1" REVEALS - REVEAL SPACING AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR 23. DEGKS -1x TREX OVER FOUNDATION -GRADE, PRESSURE TREATED SLEEPER SYSTEM, OVER SLOPED ELEVATIONS -REVEALS TO RUN VERTICALLY. "EGHANIGALLY FASTEN TO WALL SIDING PER EPDM ROOFING, OVER WOOD FRAMING. USE HIDDEN DEGK FASTENER SYSTE" WITH STAINLESS STEEL MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS WITH CONGEALED FASTENER SYSTEM, WITH DRIPS, CLIPS, SUPPORT ANGLES, GAPS, AND REVEALS AS RECOMMENDED TO ALLOW MOISTURE TO DRAIN TO EXTERIOR - ALL OPENINGS TO DRAIN CAVITY TO BE SEALED WITH INSECT SCREEN OR INSECT BARRIER. INSTALL SIDING OVER SHEATHING AND UNDERLAYMENT PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS, WITH STAINLESS FASTENERS IN SLOTTED FASTENER POINTS TO ALLOW MOVEMENT. 12. STUCCO SIDING - 3 -GOAT PORTLAND GEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM OVER SELF -FURRING, CORROSION - �L W U RESISTANT, EXPANDED METAL LATH AND FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANGE SYSTEM (BID MTI SURE U1 Of a M CAVITY) WITH WEEP SGREED AND SCREED DEFLECTOR. STUGGO FINISH TO BE ??? FINISH WITH WHITE w�() N( m GEMENT, MINERAL PIGMENTS AND 51LICA SAND MIXED $-: APPLIED TO DASH GOAT. z 5 ([u 13. FOUNDATION INSULATION PROTECTION - STUCCO WITH STUCCO GAP (MATGH STUCCO SIDING to z O v z= u APPEAR ANGE, TEXTURE AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS) AT TYPICAL CONDITIONS. AT STONE, APPLY NATURAL STONE VENEER DOWN BELOW FINAL GRADE AND INSULATE FOUNDATION WALLS ON THE INTERIOR. FOR DETAILS AND INFORMATION ON PROPER STUCCO INSTALLATION AT DRAIN BOARD X INSULATION AND FOUNDATION WATERPROOFING SYSTEM, SEE MASONRY TECH. INC, WEBSITE DETAILS FOR WEEP SGREED TRANSITIONS, SUB -GRADE FLASHING, AND COORDINATION WITH WATERPROOFING SYSTEM. 14. EXTERIOR BEAMS AND BRAGKETS TO BE FROM SOLID TIMBERS OR BUILT-UP FROM 34S A e BETTER WESTERN RED GEDAR TO RESEMBLE SOLID TIMBERS. CHAMFER OR RADIUS EDGES AS REQUIRED TO HIDE JOINTS. ASSEMBLE USING LOCK -MITERED CORNERS, SGARF JOINTS, EXTERIOR -GRADE WOOD GLUE AND GORRO510N-RE5ISTANT FASTENERS. STEEL CONNECTIONS AS DRAWN. FLASHING TO MATCH HOUSE ON ALL EXPOSED HORIZONTAL BEAM � BRACKET SURFAGES. WIRE BRUSH BEAM5 AND BRAGKETS TO BRING OUT GRAIN PRIOR TO STAINING. BID SIKKENS STD 1 -GOAT SYSTEM, AND VERIFY FINAL COLOR $-: PRODUCT WITH OWNERS. 15. WINDOWS: BID "ARVIN ULTIMATE WINDOWS WITH NATURAL WOOD INTERIORS IN SIZES SHOWN ON FLOOR PLANS. SEE ELEVATIONS FOR OPERATION. SEE Al GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES, WALL CAVITY MAINTENANGE SYSTEM DETAILS, AND DETAILS IN THIS DRAWING SET FOR TYPICAL WINDOW FLASHING AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. 16. TYPICAL WINDOW $-: PATIO DOOR TRIM: SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. AT METAL SIDING, WINDOW TRIM TO BE METAL TO MATCH METAL SIDING WITH 3" FLAT METAL TRIM TOP AND SIDES 1/2" PROUD OF SIDING WITH, 0" FLAT METAL BASE TRIM 1" PROUD OF SIDING, USE CONGEALED FASTENERS AND LAP PROJECT TEAM SEAMS, SEAL AS REQUIRED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AT STONE, WINDOW TRIM TO BE STONE RETURNS TO MATCH BODY STONE, WITH GUT LIMESTONE SILLS AND LINTELS - SILLS AND LINTELSTO HAVE SLOPED TOPS TO DRAIN, AND DRIP IGERFS ALONG BOTTOM EDGES. ARGH ITEGT 17. FRONT DOOR: 21/4" THICK ENTRY DOOR AS SUPPLIED BY "ARVIN WINDOWS - VERIFY DOOR DESIGN, SPEGIES, FINISH, GLASS TYPE, DOOR HARDWARE, AND HINGES WITH OWNER. ASSUME SHARRATT DESIGN � GO"PANY PREFINISHED METAL CASINGS AROUND FRONT DOOR TO MATGH "ARVIN FRAME FINISH. 4004 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 18. GARAGE DOORS: INSULATED, PAINTED, FLUSH -PANEL GARAGE DOORS WITH ELECTRIC GARAGE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 DOOR OPENERS, KEYPAD ENTRY, 8,:2 REMOTES PER DOOR. OWNER TO APPROVE SPEGIES, FINISH 8,� CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN DESIGN. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 19. EXTERIOR COLUMNS: VENTED WOOD GOLU"N BUILT-UP FROM 2x D � BETTER, 545, WEST. RED CEDAR WITH LOGK-MITERED CORNERS AND SCARF JOINTS (OVER STRUCT. POST WHERE APPLICABLE) SIMILAR TO DRAWINGS TO RESE"BLE SOLID TIMBER POSTS. WIRE BRUSH TO BRING OUT GRAIN. BID WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. SIKKENS STD 1 -GOAT SYSTEM, AND VERIFY FINAL COLOR � PRODUCT WITH OWNERS. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 20. NATURAL STONE VENEER: FULL -DEPTH (THIN VENEERS WHERE NOTED) NATURAL STONE VENEER OVER FULL -HEIGHT CAVITY MAINTENANGE SYSTEM (BID MTI SURE CAVITY WITH WEEPS AS REQ -D), STEVE RIVARD - -952-888-051G OWNER TO APPROVE FULL-SCALE MORTARED STONE MOCKUP WITH GAP ON SITE PRIOR TO ORDER OF FINAL STONE. FOR BID, ASSUME CHILTON BLEND LEDGE STONE. SEE ALTERNATES. GENERAL GONTRAGTOR 21. NATURAL STONE WINDOW SILLS AND STONE GAPS: GUT LIMESTONE IN THIGKNESSES AND SIZES JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS (VERIFY SPECIES WITH OWNERS). WHERE INDICATED, LINTELS TO PROJECT 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE 1" PROUD OF BODY STONE. WINDOW SILLS TO PRO -JF -GT 2" PROUD OF BODY STONE. EDINA, MN 55430 22. ENTRY PORCH FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE, STAINED. JEFF KRAEMER - .952-935-9100 23. DEGKS -1x TREX OVER FOUNDATION -GRADE, PRESSURE TREATED SLEEPER SYSTEM, OVER SLOPED ISSUED FOR EPDM ROOFING, OVER WOOD FRAMING. USE HIDDEN DEGK FASTENER SYSTE" WITH STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS 24. RAILINGS: SEE DRAWINGS - RE -USE OWNERS' EXISTING RAILING GLASS (VERIFY THAT EXISTING GLASS IS TEMPERED), AND GUSTO" FABRICATE A STAINLESS STEEL HORIZONTAL GAP AND VERTICALS FOR MOUNTING GLASS. DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER. ALL HEIGHTS $. PICKET SPACINGS TO COMPLY WITH GODS REQUIREMENTS (VERIFY W/LOGAL CODE OFFICIALS). ISSUE DATE �L W U W Z W-1( U1 Of a M O U D U t~J) w�() N( m N z 5 ([u z 0 4, to z O v z= u OC O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, `-N SHEET LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. G� COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. 1 3 A14 A14 TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER i MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 1/4" o � 7F] o GUEST GUEST o LAUNDRY o PWDR o BACK HA L o BATH BEDROOM 1 105 106 107 14 113 DE '� 1 .1 T I MAIN LEVEL S.F. - -�. 964'- 0 3/4" - = TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGNFRAMING PER STRUCTURAL _ BY TRUSS SUPPLIER - - -- LOWER LEVEL T.P. 962'-p.. GUEST b- - - T BEDROOM 2 - � SPORT COURT 003;LOWER LEVEL AgL - -I953'-0" ad T g'; On; __ — "IIO O SPORT COURT - = 945SLAB 0 0.- —III II I dllll�°I�III � � � III III III III 111- 1 BUILDING SECTION 03 Al V 1/411 = 1'-0" 3 r GLULAM BEAM TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER GLULAI" BEAM GLULAM BEAM MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 1/4" Ln -- __-- - 4CAR _-_ _ _ m _ = GARAGE _ -_ = GRANULAR FILL - _ = EPDXY OVER CONC. _ - - - - MAIN LEVEL S.F. MECH CHASE ------------` _ WEEPS @ 24" O.G. 7 SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN GARAGE SLAB a 1. FINISH STONE t: -0" GONG. BLOCK pp IIID o - O O II �I II III II III 'I III II = II II = 2 BUILDING SECTION 04 I V 1/411 = 1'-0" 1 3 2 A14 A14 A14 TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER MEDIAN HEIGHT 989'- 3 3/8" CONT, VAULTED CEILING 1 I UPPER LEVEL T.P. 4'- 1v2°D CEILING 8'- %' 1 985'- 0" Ir DROPPE I � MASTER MASTER El BATHROOM BEDROOM Fli 204 201 DEGK FRAMING OVER EPD1" ROOF PITCHED TO D.S. 24T UPPER LEVEL S.F. AC FT TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS S _ FRAMINGPER_STRUGTURAL - - - -MAIN LEVEL T.P. V -GROVE CEILING SOFFIT TO ALIGN WITH ' BOTTOM OF ROLL -UP SCREEN EXERCISE INDOOR ' POOL -oa 117 116 - - -MAIN LEVEL 4 964'- 0 3/4" i I- I -FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL = LOWER LEVEL T.P. 962'- 0" III III III L' 10 III -III a a - ,.. - _ -LOWER LEVEL L 953'- 0"` R O a II O O III III -SPORT COURT SLAB TT TT TT T TT T TT TT T TT T TT T T T T TT TT TT T T T T T TT T T � 945' - 0" II III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III I II III II 3 BUILDING SECTION 05 A13 1/411 = 1'-0" sharra 4d4es company 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A5 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AS) ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SGHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE �L w 0 Z w � � Q m' 0 v U W� N m R_ Z 5 Of Z IN Q Z o Q�L r Z= OL O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 x 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET 3 LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. G COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER 7'-01/2° w -,z3 w-122 w-�21 w -,2o GLULAI`1 0 4 CAR W.I.C. � GUEST BATH GARAGE 112 110 � 114 — a FLOOR FRAMING PER _STRUCTURAL z --t a =III I IIIIII III III III III III III III III IIIL III III III III IIIIII-\01 3 A13 GLULAM MEDIAN HEIGHT 989' - 3 3/8" UPPER LEVEL T.P. 985'- UPPER 85'- UPPER LEVEL S 976'- 6" _ MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 1 /4" MAIN LEVEL S.F. j 964'- 0 3/4" LOWER LEVEL T.P. 962' - 0" lR - 008 a I III I I I III I III _ _ LOWER LEVEL � 953'- 0 !� O O M - - IM SPORT COURT 11 t1� F- H— R 11 945'- 0" r2*BUILDING SECTION 07 A1411/411 = 1'-011 TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER ---- GLU LAM MEDIAN 7HEIGH� V 1 989' - 3 3/8" _ UP_PER LEVEL T.P. 985'- 0" TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRUSS SUPPLIER UPPER vr; y o,�; a GARAGE SLAB �P - .� 961'- p" - - - °� POOL I— III III MECHANICAL LOWER LEVEL SPORT a - 953' --C.. COURT III III .. — ��.on,ti - III III III— - ��� I III I III III II II - _ a 9 - SPORT COURT a a sLa6 _III III - 945'- 0" 0 II -III III III III III -III III III III III- SII -III III- III III III III -III III- III III III II -III III II � J 1IIIIIIIIIIIBUILDING SECTION 06 1 2 r2 1 A14 1 /4" = 1'-0" Al2 A15 Al2 A13 sharra 4d4es company 4q 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUGTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. UPPER LEVEL T.P. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH 985'- 0" BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4300 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 352-335-3100 ISSUED FOR UPPER LE EL S 976'-6" 70 MAIN LEVEL T.P. 01LI 974'- 5 15 1 /4" I - MAIN LEVEL S.F. � 964'- 00 3/4" 1 LOWER LEVEL T.P. GARAGE SLAB 961'- 0" LOWER LEVEL 953'- 0" V SPORT COURT SLAB 945'- 0" L L 3 BUILDING SECTION 08 Al 4J 1/411 = 1'-011 ISSUE DATE W 0 W Y s 0 O v U STAIR MASTER O 201 R- Z 5 ([pill 0 Z 0 Q � z o Z 8 A15 LANDING BEDROOM X 200 1 07/24/17 7, X UPPER LEVEL S.F. 08/30/17 976'- 6�� W-117 W-116 ` W-115 ` W-114 ` W-113 MAIN LEVEL T.P �� 974 5 1/4" TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN Ilk BY TRUSS SUPPLIER KITCHEN 1-? LIVING - 115 ROOM ' 102 ' °S w-112 INDOOR POOL oa O ` 116 FURR _ ` MAIN LEVEL S.F. - 964'- %CV TRUSS LAYOUT AND DESIGN BY TRusS SUPPLIER 00000000000 CONC. PLANKLOWER e LEVEL T.P. 962'- 0" vr; y o,�; a GARAGE SLAB �P - .� 961'- p" - - - °� POOL I— III III MECHANICAL LOWER LEVEL SPORT a - 953' --C.. COURT III III .. — ��.on,ti - III III III— - ��� I III I III III II II - _ a 9 - SPORT COURT a a sLa6 _III III - 945'- 0" 0 II -III III III III III -III III III III III- SII -III III- III III III III -III III- III III III II -III III II � J 1IIIIIIIIIIIBUILDING SECTION 06 1 2 r2 1 A14 1 /4" = 1'-0" Al2 A15 Al2 A13 sharra 4d4es company 4q 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUGTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. UPPER LEVEL T.P. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH 985'- 0" BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4300 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 352-335-3100 ISSUED FOR UPPER LE EL S 976'-6" 70 MAIN LEVEL T.P. 01LI 974'- 5 15 1 /4" I - MAIN LEVEL S.F. � 964'- 00 3/4" 1 LOWER LEVEL T.P. GARAGE SLAB 961'- 0" LOWER LEVEL 953'- 0" V SPORT COURT SLAB 945'- 0" L L 3 BUILDING SECTION 08 Al 4J 1/411 = 1'-011 ISSUE DATE W 0 W Y � J m� 0 O v U W N m R- Z 5 ([pill 0 Z 0 Q � z o Z 8 OL = O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 225 KEL-L_Y AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. GSI COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. EPD" ROOF PIGTH TO EDGES STRUCTURAL BEAMS PER STRUCTURAL PRE -FINISHED METAL FASCIA V -GROVE CEILING BUILT-UP BOX BEAM 1/2" STEEL CONNECTIONS METAL FLASHI METAL BAND 2x4 FR, WALL ���;r-14 PLYWC WRAPE WATEP 2x12 LE BOARC METAL METAL BAND RI M BEAM METAL CLADDING DETAIL - ROOF BRACKET 3/4" — 1'-0" DETAIL - DECK FRAMING 1 1/2" = 1'-0" TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION PREFINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL ROOFING (SEE 5PEGIFIGATIONS ) -PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGES -PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING U.N.O. ON OPEN VALLEYS -ICE �. WATER SHIELD SEE SPECIFICATIONS (GRACE OR EQUAL) PROTECT FROM U.V. EXPOSURE UNTIL ROOFING IS APPLIED -5/8" PLYWOOD (APA RATED ROOF SHEATHING) w/ "H" CLIPS PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.G. - TRUSS DESIGN $_: CONFIGURATION BY TRUSS SUPPLIER (COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER) ADDITIONAL HAND FRAMING AS REQUIRED TYPICAL FASCIA CONSTRUCTION INTEGRATED METAL GUTTER SYSTEM TO MATCH ROOFING PANEL SYSTEM OVER 2X- SUBFASGA TYPICAL SOFFIT: lx(3 GEDAR V -GROOVE TYPICAL ROOF VENTILATION AND INSULATION: -USE CONTINUOUSLY VENTED SOFFITS ON ALL EDGES w/ 2" AIR CHUTES AND RIDGE VENTS TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS AIR FLOW R-50 B.I.B. INSULATION OVER ALL HEATED SPACE TYPICAL CEILING CONSTRUCTION - 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON ALL CEILINGS - V -GROOVE CEILING TO MATGH SOFFITS AT VAULTED AREAS VERIFY FINISH MATERIAL w/ ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS -VAULTS, SOFFITS 8,: CEILING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS -GARAGE CEILING SHALL BE 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD, TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED AND PAINTED TYPICAL WINDOW TRIM SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION -STONE PER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 2 -PLY GRADE -D BUILDING PAPER -1/2" GDX SHEATHING - 2X6 STUDS @ 10" o.c. U.N.O. W/ R-19 MIN. INSULATION (CLOSED CELL OR B.I.B. TBD) - HEADERS TO BE SIZED PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS - CONTINUOUS BREATHABLE POLY VAPOR BARRIER TAPED AND SEALED TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION - 3/4" TSG PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GLUED 8,: NAILED WITH RING -SHANK NAILS - FLOOR FRAMING PER STURGTURAL DRAWINGS APPLY SPRAY FOAM R-21 RIM INSULATION AFTER ALL RIM PENETRATIONS ARE CO"PLETE STEEL STONE LEDGER AT WINDOW HEAD SOLID GROUT TO G" ABOVE GRADE PROVIDE WEEPS @ 24" OG PROVIDE 1" CAVITY BEHIND STONE VENEER -"EGHANICALLY ATTACH MIRADRAN 0200 DRAINAGE BOARD. -"IRADRI (380/681 -1/2" TRT'D PLYWOOD PRESSURE TREATED 2x PLATE OVER SILL GASKET (TYPICAL) SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR ANCHOR BOLT SIZE AND PLACEMENT THERMAL BREAK TYPICAL FOOTING AND DRAINAGE: - SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FOOTING SIZES AND REINFORGEMENT - WATER PROOFING SYSTEM WITH FREE -DRAINING R-10 DRAIN BOARD INSULATION (TUFF -N -DRI / WARM -N -DRI 2 3/8" - FOOTINGS TO SIT ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR GOMPAGTED GRANULAR FILL - BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE BELOW FROST DEPTH 42" BELOW GRADE MIN. STEP FOOTING PER SOIL ENG. - DRAIN TILE IN PEA ROGK BED W/ SILT CLOTH OVER SLOPE TO SUMP BASKET OR DAYLIGHT - WASHED ROGK BED UNDER LOWER LEVEL SLAB DRAIN TO INTERIOR DRAIN TILE - BAGKFILL FOUNDATION WITH FREE-DRANING, COMPACTED BAGKFILL GAP WITH POSITIVELY SLOPED CLAY (UNDER TOPSOIL) :-:VEL S.F. 5 _4' - 0 3/4" 1 METAL FLASHING TREX DEGKING 2x12 LEDGER BOARD UPPER LEVEL T.P. 985'- 0" MASTER BATHROOM TILE _L UPPER LEVEL S.F. 976'- 6" _ MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974' - 5 1/4" EXERCISE CPT MAIN LEVEL S.F. 964'- 0 3/4" I `v - 13,Nkk -III - - I III III III III III III III III =III III 1 TYP WALL SECTION STONE 3/81 = 1'-0" TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION PREFINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL ROOFING (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) -PREFINISHED METAL DRIP EDGES -PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING U.N.O. ON OPEN VALLEYS -ICE � WATER SHIELD SEE SPECIFICATIONS (GRACE OR EQUAL) PROTECT FROM U.V. EXPOSURE UNTIL ROOFING IS APPLIED -5/8" PLYWOOD (APA RATED ROOF SHEATHING) WITH "H" CLIPS PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.G. - TRUSS DESIGN 8,: GONFIGURATION BY TRUSS SUPPLIER (COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER) ADDITIONAL HAND FRAMING AS REQUIRED TYPICAL FASCIA CONSTRUCTION 2 PIECE PRE -FINISHED METAL FASCIA TO MATCH ROOFING PANEL SYSTEM OVER 2X- SUBFASCA SEE SOFFIT DETAIL- UPPER ETAIL 1XG V -GROOVE SOFFIT w/ TYPICAL ROOF VENTILATION AND INSULATION -USE CONTINUOUSLY VENTED SOFFITS, 2" AIR CHUTES AND RIDGE VENTS TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS AIR FLOW - R-50 B.I.B. INSULATION OVER ALL HEATED SPACE TYPICAL CEILING CONSTRUCTION - 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON ALL CEILINGS -VAULTS, SOFFITS $_: CEILING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS -GARAGE CEILING SHALL BE 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD, TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED AND PAINTED TYPICAL WINDOW TRIM SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION STUCCO WATER TABLE SYSTEM WITH DRAINAGE PLANE PER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 2 -PLY GRADE -D BUILDING PAPER m -1/2" GDX SHEATHING o - 2X6 STUDS LO 10" D.C. U.N.O. ry W/ R-21"IN. INSULATION (OPEN CELL IGYNENE NORTHERN CLIMATE) - HEADERS TO BE SIZED PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS - CONTINUOUS BREATHABLE POLY VAPOR BARRIER GRADE SLOPE AWAY FROM FIND 1/2" PER FT. FIRST 4' PRESSURE TREATED 2x PLATE OVER SILL GASKET (TYPICAL) SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR ANCHOR BOLT SIZING AND PLACE"ENT TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: - 3/4" TSG PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GLUED $ NAILED WITH RING -SHANK NAILS - FLOOR FRAMING PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS -APPLY CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM R-21 ALL RIMS INSULATION AFTER ALL RIM PENETRATIONS ARE GO"PLETE SLAB -ON -GRADE: - 4" CONCRETE SLAB - SEE STURCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB REINFORCEMENT SIZE AND SPACING - 2" RIGID INSULATION - TUFF -POLY #3 LAMINATED VAPOR BARRIER- SEAL ALL EDGES - 0" GOMPAGTED, WASHED ROCK DRAIN BED WITH DRAIN TILE AND RADON VENTILATION TYPICAL FOOTING AND DRAINAGE: - SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FOOTING SIZES AND REINFORGE"ENT - WATER PROOFING SYSTEM WITH FREE -DRAINING R-10 DRAIN BOARD INSULATION (TUFF -N -DRI / WARM -N -DRI) 2 3/8" - FOOTINGS TO SIT ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR GOMPAGTED GRANULAR FILL - BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE BELOW FROST DEPTH 42" BELOW GRADE MIN. - DRAIN TILE IN PEA ROGK BED W/ SILT CLOTH OVER SLOPE TO SUMP BASKET OR DAYLIGHT - WASHED ROGK BED UNDER LOWER LEVEL SLAB DRAIN TO INTERIOR DRAIN TILE - BAGKFILL FOUNDATION WITH FREE -DRAINING, COMPACTED BAGKFILL GAP WITH POSITIVELY SLOPED CLAY (UNDER TOPSOIL) 2-6" TYP WALL SECTION @ STUCCO 3/8" = 1'-0" DETAIL - SOFFIT - FROM BUILDING SECTION 01 - 1 1/2" = V-0" STANDING SEAM ROOF INSTALLED PER "FGR 5/8" ROOF SHEATHING "J" HOOK 2x12 FASCIA BOARD GUT TO MATCH ROOF OVER 2x10 SUB-FASGIA UPPER METAL FASCIA TO "ATGH ROOF COLOR FASCIA CONNECTOR 2x12 FASCIA BOARD OVER 2x12 SUB -FASCIA LOWER METAL FASCIA TO "ATGH ROOF COLOR DONT. INTEGRATE LINNEAR SOFFIT VENT 3/4" V -GROOVE GEDAR SOFFIT METAL PANELS PER "FGR. BUILDING PAPER TO OVERLAP "L" FLASHING PITGHEN GAP FLASHING TO MATGH EXTERIOR METAL PANELS "L" FLASHING WITH HE"MED DRIP EDGE 10" EXTENSION UP WALL "IN. EFIS STUCCO 2" BEAD BOARD LIQUID APPLIED WATERPROOF BARRIER WITH MESHED SEAMS FLASHING BREAK AT GRADE AS REQUIRED BELOW GRADE STUCCO 2" TUFF -N -DRI TUFF -N -DRI MEMBRANE 00 MILS WET THICKNESS FOUNDATION WALL PER PLAN TRUSS DESIGN BY SUPPLIER DINING ROOM HDWD OR ENGINSFRED SPORT COURT GYM FLOOR TRUSS DESIGN BY SUPPLIER PPLIER UPPER LEVEL T.P. 985'- 0" MAIN LEVEL T.P. 974'- 5 1/4" MAIN LEVEL S.F. 964'- 0 3/4" LOWER LEVEL T.P. 962'- 0" TYPICAL WATER TABLE 0 LOWER LEVEL 953'- 0" SPORT COURT SLAB 945'- 0" STUD WALL PER PLAN 2x TREATED SILL PLATE 3/4" HARDWOOD FLOORING �— 3/4" TTG 5UBFLOOR 1/2 ANCHOR BOLT 1" RIGID INSULATION CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2x TREATED SILL PLATE sharra cies company is I 464 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesign.com SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT OOURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEOTIONS A13 BUILDING SEOTIONS A14- BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES pROJEGT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN GO"PANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUGTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAE"ER 5, SONS, INC 4300 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAE"ER -.952-335-3100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE �L w 0 w Z w-1 SL Q m Ci O U U W N m I- 5 u T_ Z Q � Z O v Z= Ov X O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X 1/2 ANCHOR BOLT PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2(325 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET — FUR OUT WALL PER PLANA15 LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, U.C. c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. ROLLED ri'*' KITCHEN - ISLAND 2 2 KITCHEN - ISLAND 4 A20 3/8" = 1'-0" A20 3/8" = 1'-0" r3--'NKITCHEN - ISLAND 3 A20 3/8" = 1'-0" �6�LIVING ROOM - 3D VIEW t0004KITCHEN - ISLAND 1 �203/8" = 1'-0" r�1LIVING ROOM -WINDOW WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" LIVING ROOM - FIREPLACE WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" r5---NKITCHEN - SINK/COOKING A/n 3/8" = 1'-0" a KITCHEN - 3D VIEW 20 LIVING ROOM - FRONT DOOR 3/8" = 1'-0" rll-'-*NFOYER- BENCH A20 3/8" = 1'-0" sharra ClIes company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 W W � Of I m� 0 o D S N m R- Z 5 ([pill �u Z 0 Q Z o Z= 8 OL O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET ,moo LEGAL NOTICE THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. sharra ClIesi 1 company` Or 404 SECOND STREET PHONE: 952-470-9750 SUITE 100 FAX: 952-707-5859 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 info@sharrattdesi9n.Gom SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET W_,29 W -,2B A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN ' A5 SPORT COURT PLAN - o0o 00o AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-'�' ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS 1 POOL BATH - SHOWER 2 POOL BATH -SINKr"NPOWDER -SINK 4 GUEST BATH -SHOWER 5 GUEST BATH -SINK 6 LAUNDRY -SINK 7 LAUNDRY - APP WALL A13 BUILDING SECTIONS 21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0"21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0" A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES o J STONE WALL - / W-134 W-133 W-132 W-13, W-130 - - O-3 v _ - - yjjjIII- - -_ - - ' U.O. u.c. - ----- -_ — - FRIG FRIG - - -- 8 DINING - 3D VIEW g DINING - CASED OPENING 10 DINING - BUILT-IN WALL11 DINING - WINDOW WALL r12--`\D1N1NG - STONE WALL PROJECT TEAM k21 A21 3/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8' = 1'-0" A21 3/8' = 1'-0" A21 J 3/8' = 1'-0" ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � GOI`MPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 O STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEr lER 8, SONS, INC i 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 i JEFF KRAEI" IER - .952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR � II O SL W U Of D (j) Z o 0 0l d 0 D C4 D �zavw��Z� _ w w Ul N o z= T ISSUE DATE 0 m M M� u Q O 05/19/17 X 13 POOL - 3D VIEW 1 r14-%'-NP00L - NANA WALL r15-`*NP00L - WINDOW WALL 07/24/17 x A21 213/8" = 1'-0" A21 3/8" = 1'-0" 08/30/17 x O PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN v HOME \ 2625 KELLY AVENUE 108 23 \ , 1,0 ORONO, MN V A ` v v SHEET A21/ / \ / LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED 1 8 POOL EXERCISE WALL WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND ri6 P L - D VIEW 2ri7P L - TV WALL COMPANY, LLC. 2121 3/8" = 1'-0" A213/8" = 1'-0" Y COPRGHT20165H� ARRAT7DESIGNCOMPANYLLC. MASTER BATH - SHOWER WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" 4 MASTER BATH - VANITY WALL ,22 J 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER BATH - 3D VIEW 2 MASTER BATH - TUB WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER BATH - WATER CLOSET 3/8" = 1 '-0" MASTER BEDROOM - FIREPLACE 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER BEDROOM - BATH WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER BATH - 3D VIEW 1 r6`\MASTER BEDROOM - 3D VIEW 1 �22 MASTER BEDROOM - NANA WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER BEDROOM - BED WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" MASTER LAUNDRY - APP WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" sharra ClIes company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 %Z PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al DOVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 I"IAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SEGTIONS A13 BUILDING SEGTIONS A14 BUILDING SEGTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 NTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-0510 GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE W 0 W W � Of J� m 0 o D W N mLOL, Z 5 [[et �u Z 0 Q Z o Z= 8 OL O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2625 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET A22 LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. w-oo3 w-oo2 wool oo , , , REC ROOM -WINDOW WALL Mw] W-004 W-OOs 5 SPORT COURT -STAIRS I� I I I W-005 W-004 I I I I I r3----NRED Name Number FLOOR \ , WALL FINISH BASE MATERIAL BASE FINISH CASING MATERIAL CASING CABINETR CABINETR COUNTER TOP FINISH Y Y FINISH MATERIAL , 05/19/17 X , 002 \ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 , , , , , , , , oos \ \ \ BUILDING SECTIONS , \ A20 , A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS , , INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 , A24 SCHEDULES w-oo3 w-oo2 wool oo , , , REC ROOM -WINDOW WALL Mw] W-004 W-OOs 5 SPORT COURT -STAIRS I� I I I W-005 W-004 I I I I I r3----NRED REC ROOM -FIREPLACE ROOM -SPORT COURT A23 3/8" = 1'-0" J r Name Number FLOOR \ WALL MATERIAL WALL FINISH BASE MATERIAL BASE FINISH CASING MATERIAL CASING CABINETR CABINETR COUNTER TOP FINISH Y Y FINISH MATERIAL COUNTER TOF FINISH 05/19/17 X 004 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 , , , , , , , , oos \ \ A14 BUILDING SECTIONS , BUILDING DETAILS A20 , A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS , , INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 , A24 SCHEDULES , REC ROOM -FIREPLACE ROOM -SPORT COURT A23 3/8" = 1'-0" J r Name Number FLOOR \ WALL MATERIAL WALL FINISH BASE MATERIAL BASE FINISH CASING MATERIAL CASING CABINETR CABINETR COUNTER TOP FINISH Y Y FINISH MATERIAL COUNTER TOF FINISH 05/19/17 X 004 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 , A13 , A14 BUILDING SECTIONS , BUILDING DETAILS A20 , A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS , , INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 , A24 SCHEDULES , REC ROOM - STAIR/KITCHEN A23 3/8" = 1'-0" sh4des a ROOM SCHEDULE Name Number FLOOR Floor Finish WALL MATERIAL WALL FINISH BASE MATERIAL BASE FINISH CASING MATERIAL CASING CABINETR CABINETR COUNTER TOP FINISH Y Y FINISH MATERIAL COUNTER TOF FINISH CEILING MATERIAL CEILING FINISH Comments LOWER KITCHEN 001 CONC TILE GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT REC ROOM 002 CONC CPT GYP/WOOD PAINT/STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT SPORT COURT 003 CONC GYM FLOOR GYP H. IMPACT PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A GYP PAINT STORAGE 004 CONC CONC. CONC/GYP PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT N/A N/A GYP PAINT BATHROOM 005 CONC TILE GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT GUEST BEDROOM 2 006 CONC CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD PAINT WOOD STAIN GYP PAINT GUEST CLOSET 007 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING TILE GYP � PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN C.O.S. C.O.S. GYP PAINT POOL MECHANICAL 008 CONC CONC. GYP/CON. PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT N/A N/A CONC MECH 1 009 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING TILE GYP PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT N/A N/A GYP PAINT FOYER 101 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GYP/WOOD PAINT/STAIN LIVING ROOM 102 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD PAINT WOOD STAIN GYP PAINT STORAGE ROOM 103 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A GYP PAINT DINING ROOM 104 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP/STONE � PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GYP PAINT LAUNDRY 105 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING VINYL GYP PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT LAMINATE N/A GYP PAINT PWDR 106 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT/WLPPR WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT BACK HALL 107 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A N/A N/A GYP PAINT BACK ENTRY 108 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT COAT CLOSET 109 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN C.O.S C.O.S. GYP PAINT 4 CAR GARAGE 110 CONC EPDXY OVER CONC. GYP PAINT EPDXY WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD STAINED GYP PAINT HALL 111 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A GYP PAINT W.I.C. 112 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN C.O.S. C.O.S. GYP PAINT GUEST BEDROOM 1 113 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A GYP PAINT GUEST BATH 114 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING TILE GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT KITCHEN 115 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING HDWD GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT INDOOR POOL 116 CONC TILE GYP PAINT TILE COMPOSIT WOOD PAINT GYP PAINT EXERCISE 117 CONC CPT _GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GYP PAINT POOL BATH 118 CONC TILE GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT MAIN STAIRS 119 WOOD CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A GYP/WOOD STAIN UPPER STAIR LANDING 200 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN N/A N/A GYP/WOOD STAIN MASTER BEDROOM 201 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN WOOD STAIN GRANITE HONED GYP/WOOD SHARRATT DESIGN � COMPANY 404 SECOND ST -SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT /NICHOLAS COWAN m � [[puu Q � O 05/19/17 X EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES X STAIN LAUNDRY 202 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT MASTER BATHROOM 204 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING TILE GYP PAINT/TILE WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT GRANITE HONED GYP/WOOD PAINT/STAIN W.I.C. 205 3/4" FLOOR SHEATHING CPT GYP PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT WOOD PAINT GRANITE HONED GYP PAINT rra company. 4ro4 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra odes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN AB ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN As SPORT couRT PLAN AG LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A7 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A8 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All PROJECT m � [[puu Q � O 05/19/17 X EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES TEAM ARCH ITEGT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING INC. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - 952-888-6510 GENERAL CONTRACTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 issuEo FOR 0 v z � o w(jSL DD ) v � z a v w� � z� oc w w �� N� 5 � Z= ISSUE DATE U � m 'a-) PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 225 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I"IN SHEET A23 LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 91-iARRAT7 DESIGN �E COMPANY LLC. m � [[puu Q � O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 x 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 225 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I"IN SHEET A23 LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 91-iARRAT7 DESIGN �E COMPANY LLC. FRAME WINDOW OPENING WITH THE SILL SLOPED TOWARDS THE EXTERIOR TO DRAIN 1/4" PER 6" MIN., OR USE BEVELED CEDAR SIDING OVER LEVEL SILL (SIDING SLOPED TOWARDS EXTERIOR), OR USE A PAN FLASHING AND APPLY ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS. APPLY SELF STICKING MEMBRANE TO SEAL THE ROUGH OPENING CORNERS - MEMBRANE TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING PAPER USED, AND APPLIED AT TEMPERATURE AS REQUIRED TO ADHERE PROPERLY. REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND BUBBLES SO THAT MEMBRANE ADHERES AND BONDS WELL TO BUILDING PAPER. E APPLY BUILDING PAPER JAMB FLASHINGS ON BOTH SIDES OF OPENING, WRAPPING DEPTH OF JAMB OVER THE UPTURNED SILL FLASHING AND OUT ONTO THE SHEATHING ON BOTH SIDES TO BEYOND THE EDGES OF THE SILL FLASHING AND 12" ABOVE THE ROUGH OPENING HEAD. LEAVE BOTTOM EDGES OF JAMB FLASHINGS LOOSE FOR LAPPING OVER BUILDING PAPER AFTER WINDOW INSTALLATION. G INSTALL A COMPATIBLE, PREFINISHED METAL WINDOW CAP FLASHING. THEN APPLY 12" MINIMUM HT PIECE OF BUILDING PAPER (OR BUTYL TAPE, OR SELF -STICK ICE&WATER PROTECTION MEMBRANCE DEPENDING ON COMPATIBILITY) TO 16" BEYOND ROUGH OPENING TO EACH SIDE OVER THE CAP FLASHING. SEAL TOP AND BOTTOM EDGES. INSTALL BUILDING PAPER DRAINAGE PLANE IN OVERLAPPING SHINGLE STYLE UP UNDER THE SILL FLASHING TO THE SILL ROUGH OPENING OVERLAPPING EACH SUCCESSIVE LAYER ON TOP OF THE ONE BELOW 4" HORIZONTALLY AND 6" VERTICALLY, OR AS DIRECTED BY PAPER MANUFACTURER. ATTACH TOP EDGE OF 12" HIGH BLDG PAPER TO SHEATHING BELOW THE SILL LEAVING BOTTOM FREE TO SLIP BUILDING PAPER UNDER LATER. EXTEND 12" BEYOND JAMBS TO EACH SIDE FROM INTERIOR, INSULATE WITH LOW -EXPANSION FOAM BEHIND NAILING FLANGE ON TOP & SIDES, BRINGING FOAM BEAD TO INTERIOR NEAR BOTTOM. ALONG BOTTOM, FOAM INTERIOR BELOW EXTENSION JAMB. DO NOT BLOCK SILL FLASHING DRAINAGE WITH INSULATION. BEFORE PROCEEDING, CONSULT WINDOW MANUFACTURER FOR SPECIFIC INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. WINDOW MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE FOLLOWING DETAILS. APPLY BUILDING PAPER SILL FLASHING (OR ICE&WATER PROTECTION MEMBRANE IF ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FELTS OR COATED PAPERS ARE USED AS BUILDING PAPER). EXTEND OUT OVER BUILDING PAPER AND DOWN BELOW SILL 4", AND UP JAMBS 6", AND OUT AROUND JAMBS ONTO SHEATHING. F USING COMPOSITE SHIMS, SHIM & ADJUST WDW FOR PLUMB, SQUARE, & LEVEL CONDITION. APPLY SEALANT TO HEAD AND JAMBS (NOT SILL - SEE FLASHING DETAIL THAT FOLLOWS FOR SILL CAULK DETAIL) AND SECURE WDW TO OPENING W/ CORROSION RESISTANT FASTENERS NOT CLOSER THAN 3" TO THE CORNERS USING THE EQUIVALENT OF 6d FASTENERS AT 16" o.c. MAX OR AS REQUIRED BY CODE. AFTER INSTALLATION SEAL THE FRAME SEAM JOINTS AT THE CORNERS USING WINDOW -MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED CORNER SEAL. WINDOW SCHEDULE TAG NOMINAL SIZE LEVEL Manufacturer Model Cladding Finish Interior Finish Operation Head Height Rough Width Rough Height GENERAL WINDOW NOTES TAG W-001 W: 6-0" x 7'-9" LOWER LEVEL Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7' - 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-002 W: 6-0" x 7'-9" LOWER LEVEL Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7' - 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-003 W: 6-0" x 7'-9" LOWER LEVEL Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7'- 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-004 W: 4'-0" x 7'-0" LOWER LEVEL GENERAL CONTRACTOR NONE Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 4' - 1" 6'- 11 5/8" TEMP. GLASS W-005 W: 9'-0" x 7'-0" LOWER LEVEL GENERAL CONTRACTOR NONE Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 91-111 6'- 11 5/8" TEMP. GLASS W-101 W: 2'-0" x 4'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2454 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7' - 11 1/2" 2' - 1" 4'- 5 5/8" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL W-102 W: 3'-0" x 6'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" Marvin Windows and Doors W-103 W: 3'-0" x 6-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" DOOR TO MATCH INTERIOR DOOR PANEL STYLE W-104 W: 3'-0" x 6'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" Marvin Windows and Doors W-105 W: 2'-0" x 4'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2454 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 2' - 1" 4'- 5 5/8" 111 W-106 W: 3'-0" x 64" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3664 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 51- 3 5/8" FIBERGLASS W-107 W: 4'-0" x 64" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP4864 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 4' - 1" 5' - 3 5/8" FIBERGLASS W-108 W: 3'-0" x 54" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3664 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 5'- 3 5/8" FIBERGLASS W-109 W: 3'-0" x 54" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3664 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 5'- 3 5/8" SWING W-110 W: 6-0" x 7'-8" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7' - 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7' - 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-111 W: 6'-0" x 7'-8" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7'- 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-112 W: 6-0" x 7'-8" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 6' - 1" 7' - 8 3/8" ALIGN BOTTOM OF GLAZING WITH ADJ. DOOR W-113 TW: 3'-2" x 4'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUAWN CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony AWNING 12'- 7 3/8" 3'- 2 1/8" 3'- 11 5/8" WINDOW WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR BELOW, ELECTRIC OPENER W-114 TW: 6-0" x 4'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUAWN7248 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony AWNING 12'- 7 3/8" 6' - 1" 3'- 11 5/8" ELECTRIC OPENER W-115 TW: 6-0" x 4'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUAWN7248 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony AWNING 12'- 7 3/8" 6' - 1" 3'- 11 5/8" 3' - 11 5/8" ELECTRIC OPENER ELECTRIC OPENER W-116 TW: 6-0" x 4'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUAWN7248 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony AWNING 12'- 7 3/8" 6' - 1" W-117 TW: 3'-2" x 4'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUAWN CUSTOM Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony AWNING 12'- 7 3/8" 3'- 2 1/8" 3'- 11 5/8" WINDOW WIDTH TO MATCH DOOR BELOW, ELECTRIC OPENER W-118 TW: 4'-0" x 1'-4" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP4820 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 9'- 6 5/8" 4' - 1" l'- 7 5/8" W-119 TW: 4'-0" x 1'-4" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP4820 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 9'- 6 5/8" 4' - 1" l'- 7 5/8" W-120 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2' - 11 5/8" W-121 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-122 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-123 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-124 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-125 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-126 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 21-711 2'- 11 5/8" W-127 W: 2'-6" x 3'-0" GARAGE SLAB Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3036 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 13'- 0 1/4" 2' - 7" 2'- 11 5/8" W-128 W: 3'-0" x 4'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3654 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 4' - 5 5/8" W-129 W: 3'-0" x 4'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3654 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 4'- 5 5/8" W-130 W: 3'-0" x 6'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" W-131 W: 3'-0" x 6'-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" W-132 W: 3'-0" x 6-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" / W-133 W: 3'-0" x 6-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" W-134 W: 3'-0" x 6-6" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3678 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 5 5/8" W-135 W: V-8" x 8'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2096 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 11-911 7'- 11 5/8" W-136 W: 5'-0" x 6'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP6072 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 7'- 11 1/2" 5' - 1" 5'- 11 5/8" W-137 BW: 5'-0" x 2'-0" MAIN LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCAP6024 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 2'- 0 3/8" 5' - 1" l'- 11 5/8" W-201 W: 3'-0" X 7'-0" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3684 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 8'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 11 5/8" W-202 W: T-0" X T-0" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3684 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 8'- 11 1/2" 3' - 1" 6'- 11 5/8" W-203 W: T-0" X T-0" UPPER LEVEL S.F. UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3684 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 8'- 11 1/2" 7'- 6" 3' - 1" 2' - 7" 6'- 11 5/8" W-204 W: 2'-6" x 3'-6" Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3044 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 3'- 7 5/8" W-205 W: 2'-6" x 3'-6" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3044 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7' - 6" 2' - 7" 3'- 7 5/8" W-206 W: 2'-6" x 3'-6" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA3044 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony CASEMENT 7' - 6" 2' - 7" 3'- 7 5/8" W-207 W: 2'-4" x 2'-4" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2828 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 4'- 3 1/8" 21-511 2'- 3 5/8" W-208 W: 2'-4" x 2'-4" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2828 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony FIXED 4'- 3 1/8" 2' - 5" 2'- 3 5/8" W-209 W: 2'-4" x 2'-4" UPPER LEVEL S.F. Marvin Windows and Doors CUCA2828 Marvin -Ebony Marvin -Ebony I FIXED 4' - 3 1/8" 2' - 5" 2'- 3 5/8" DOOR SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR DOORS TAG NOMINAL DOOR SIZE OPERATION MANUFACTURER MODEL R.O. WIDTH R.O. HEIGHT GENERAL NOTES 006 001 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 3'- 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 002 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 3'- 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 003 8'-0" X 8'-0" SLIDDER Marvin Windows and Doors CSPD8080 8'- 1 5/8" 8' - 0" DOOR TO MATCH INTERIOR DOOR PANEL STYLE 004 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 T- 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL FULL GLASS 101 4'-0" x 8'-0" SWING General contractor to select CUSTOM 4'- 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 102 24'-0" x 8'-0" FOLDING NanaWall Systems, Inc. HSW-60 23'- 8 29/32" 7'- 9 9/32" CONFIRM R.O. AND MODEL # 103 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 3'- 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 104 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 3'- 2 7/16" 81-011 CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 105 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3080 3' - 2 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 106 8'-0" X 8'-0" SLIDDER Marvin Windows and Doors CSPD8080 8'- 1 5/8" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 107 3'-0" x 8'-0" SWING TBD Tru Stile Single Swing Door 0" 0" DOOR TO MATCH INTERIOR DOOR PANEL STYLE 108 3'-6" x 8'-0" SWING TBD Tru Stile Single Swing Door 0" 0" DOOR TO MATCH INTERIOR DOOR PANEL STYLE CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 109 3'-6" X 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3680 3'- 8 7/16" 8' - 0" 110 3'-6" X 8'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD3680 3'- 8 7/16" 8' - 0" CONTEMPORARY BOTTOM RAIL 111 18'-0" X 8'-0" OVERHEAD TBD TBD 8'- 1 1/2" 18' - 3" SOLID INSULATED PANEL 112 18'-0" X 8'-0" OVERHEAD TBD TBD 8'- 1 1/2" 181-311 SOLID INSULATED PANEL 201 15'-0" x 9'-0" NANA FOLDING NanaWall Systems, Inc. SL -60 14'- 8 15/32" 8'- 9 17/32" CONFIRM R.O. AND MODEL # 202 2'-6" x 7'-0" SWING Marvin Windows and Doors CUIFD2670 2'- 8 7/16" 17'- 2 1/2" DECORATIVE GLASS DOOR SCHEDULE - INTERIOR DOORS TAG7 NOMINAL DOOR SIZE OPERATION -7E77 MANUFACTURER MODEL R.O. WIDTH R.O. HEIGHT DOOR NOTES 005 3'-0" x 8'-0" 3'-0" x 8'-0" 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING TBD 201 3' - 3" 31-311 8' - 0" NO DOOR PANELS 006 CASED OPENING GENERAL CONTRACTOR oo' 81-011 8' - 0" 007 SWING TBD ROOF PLAN 2' - 11" 008 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING TBD BUILDING SECTIONS 21-1111 81-011 ELEGTRIGAL AND 009 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING TBD LIGHTING 2' - 11" 81-011 A22 010 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING TBD ss3a 2' - 11" 8' - 0" X 011 3'-0" x 6-8" SWING SWING TBD GENERAL CONTRACTOR 3' - 3" 6'- 9 1/2" CUSTOM DOOR TO BLEND INTO WALL 113 HIDDEN DOOR HEIGHT GENTER LINE 114 9'-0" x 8'-0" C.O. CASED OPENING GENERAL CONTRACTOR D333 ROOM TAG 9' - 3" 8' - 0" NO DOOR PANELS 115 3'-0" x 8'-0" C.O. CASED OPENING GENERAL CONTRACTOR 31-311 81-011 NO DOOR PANELS 116 2'-8" X 8'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 11" 81-011 117 2'-8" x 8'-0" CASED OPENING GENERAL CONTRACTOR 2' - 11" 81-091 NO DOOR PANELS 118 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING _ TBD 2' - 11" 8' - 0" 119 2'-6" x 8'-0" SWING TBD 21-911 81-011 120 2'-8" x 8'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 11" 8' - 0" 121 2'-8" X 8'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 11" 81-011 122 2'-6" X 8-0" SWING TBD GENERAL CONTRACTOR 2' - 9" 8' - 0" 123 T-0" x 8'-0" CASED OPENING 3' - 3" 8' - 0" NO DOOR PANELS 124 2'-8" X 8'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 11" 8' - 0" 203 3'-6" x 8'-0" SWING TBD 3' - 9" 8' - 0" SPECIAL DOOR PANEL 204 2'-6" x 7'-0" CASED OPENING GENERAL CONTRACTOR 2' - 9" 7' - 0" 205 (2) 2'-0" x 8'-0" SWING TBD 4' - 3" 8' - 0" GLASS PANEL 206 2'-6" x 7'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 9" 71-011 207 2'-6" x 7'-0" SWING TBD 2' - 9" 7' - 0" 208 2'-6" x T-0" SWING TBD 2' - 9" 6'- 9 1/2" WINDOW SCHEDULE LEGEND NOMINAL SIZE: LEVEL: MODEL: W = WINDOW THIS INDICATES WHERE THE HEAD HEIGHT GUGAP = GLAD ULTIMATE CASEMENT PIGTURE BW = BASE WINDOW 15 MEASURED FROM GUGA = GLAD ULTIMATE CASEMENT TW = TRANSUM WINDOW GUAWN = GLAD ULTIMATE AWNING GSW = CLEAR STORY WINDOW TYP DOOR ELEVATION 1 1' = 1'-0'1 21/2 `1/2" 1/2" X21/2" A24 TYP. DOOR PLAN 1 if = 1'-0" 3 -**\3D VIEW - DOOR CASING A- Al INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ool DOOR TAG O KEY NOTES 201 ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AC BUILDING AND oo' WINDOW s d REVISION TAG UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN WALL SECTIONS ROOF PLAN TAG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 101A EQUIPMENT ELEGTRIGAL AND BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS TAG LIGHTING A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIXTURE TAG 1 GRIDS ss3a PLUMBING 02 WALL TAG X TAG MASTER ELEVATION HEIGHT GENTER LINE CLOSET D333 ROOM TAG 150 5F 21/2" 1/2" 1/2 21/2' LL o � W a Q m > � Q N. 0 / ol 8" 1" VARIES 4" i i i / CV / crl / / L, TYP DOOR ELEVATION 1 1' = 1'-0'1 21/2 `1/2" 1/2" X21/2" A24 TYP. DOOR PLAN 1 if = 1'-0" 3 -**\3D VIEW - DOOR CASING A- Al INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ool DOOR TAG O KEY NOTES 201 ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AC BUILDING AND oo' WINDOW s d REVISION TAG UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN WALL SECTIONS ROOF PLAN TAG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 101A EQUIPMENT ELEGTRIGAL AND BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS TAG LIGHTING A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIXTURE TAG 1 GRIDS ss3a PLUMBING 02 WALL TAG X TAG MASTER ELEVATION HEIGHT GENTER LINE CLOSET D333 ROOM TAG 150 5F sharra ties company. 404 SECOND STREET SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 PHONE: 952-470-9750 FAX: 952-707-5859 info@s h a r ra ttdes ig n. co m SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET A2 SITE PLAN A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT HOUSE A4 FOUNDATION PLAN A5 SPORT COURT PLAN AC LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AB UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AS) ROOF PLAN A10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al2 BUILDING SECTIONS A13 BUILDING SECTIONS A14 BUILDING SECTIONS A15 BUILDING DETAILS A20 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A21 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A22 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A23 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A24 SCHEDULES PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITEGT SHARRATT DE51ON � GOI`MPANY 404 SECOND ST - SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CONTACT: MIKE SHARRATT / NICHOLAS COWAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WENZEL ENGINEERING ING. 10100 MORGAN AVE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 STEVE RIVARD - _952-888-051G GENERAL GONTRAGTOR JOHN KRAEMER �. SONS, INC 4900 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MN 55430 JEFF KRAEMER - 952-935-9100 ISSUED FOR ISSUE DATE �L W U w(j),j) Z W y � Of a J m 0 O v D U w� N m� (j) Z D 5 U Q Z Q N z o v Q�L r Z OU OC W O 05/19/17 X 07/24/17 X 08/30/17 X PROPOSED NEW HOME FOR: HENNEN HOME 2025 KELLY AVENUE ORONO, I -IN SHEET A24 LEGAL NOTICE.- THESE OTICETHESE DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED OR REDISTRIBUTED WITH OUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY, LLC. ,c COPYRIGHT 2016 SHARRATT DESIGN s£ COMPANY LLC. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2625 Kelly Avenue (our survey 160824) Prepared by: Thomas M. BLoom P.L.S. No. 42379 Date: 8/3/2017 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) Garage (24'x 30') (720) S. F. A House 4,015 S.F. B Bituminous Drive 9,526 S. F. C Deck Front 78 S. F. D Deck Lake Side 760 S. F. E Ret Walls 105 S. F. F Patio/Conc Walk 1,006 S. F. G S. F. H S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. Y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 15,490 S. F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Ret Walls 105 S. F. Decks with 1/4" spacing (Width needs to be verified) 100 S. F. Lakeside Only S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 205 S. F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover 15,285 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 139,205 S. F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)] 10.98% ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J&-'Tnc " M. 0"3'o m Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720) S. F. A House 4,886 S. F. B Front Drive/Parking Area 7,663 S. F. C Front Entry Concrete 165 S. F. D Front Stepper Stone Walk 325 S. F. E Front Planters 176 S. F. F Rear Deck Area 1,038 S. F. G Rear Concrete Patio Areas 303 S. F. H Retaining Walls 38 S. F. I S. F. J S. F. K S. F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S. F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 14 594 S. F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Retaining Walls 38 S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 38 S. F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 14,556 S. F. (4) Total Lot Area 139,205 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)] 10.46% 38 20-117-23 110007 38 20-117-23 14 0006 38 20-117-23 14 0020 INTRNATL MINISTERIAL FELSHIP JOHN R & SHERRY L VOLKMAR JAMES A SCHMIDT 2477 SHADYWOOD RD 2640 KELLY AVE 2585 KELLY AVE ORONO MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 110040 38 20-117-23 14 0008 38 20-117-23 14 0021 JOHN R LUPKE MARK KIEPER ALEXANDER H WARE 2595 LYDIARD CIR POLLY KIEPER AMY S WARE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2695 KELLY AVE 4403 COUNTRY CLUB RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EDINA MN 55424 38 20-117-23 110041 38 20-117-23 14 0009 38 20-117-23 14 0022 JOHN R LUPKE BENNETT W HOUCK JILL S WINE TRUST 2595 LYDIARD CIR MELISSA A HOUCK 18515 8TH AVE N EXCELSIOR MN 55331 3225 CARMAN RD PLYMOUTH MN 55447 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 110046 38 20-117-23 14 0010 38 20-117-23 14 0025 CASCO VENTURES LLC JON S NIELSEN JACK EUGSTER/CAROL M EUGSTER 16192 STATE HWY NO 7 KIRSTEN R NIELSEN 2655 KELLY AVE MINNETONKA MN 55345 3245 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 I1 0047 38 20-117-23 14 0014 38 20-117-23 14 0026 MARTHA K BREITER LILJA JAMES DIEBEL & DEVON DIEBEL ELLEN REDMOND REVOC TRUST 21955 MINNETONKA BLVD #3 3295 CARMAN RD 2625 KELLY AVE GREENWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 110049 38 20-117-23 14 0015 CASCO VENTURES LLC JOAN E NIELSEN 16192 STATE HWY NO 7 STEVEN J NIELSEN MINNETONKA MN 55345 3300 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0001 38 20-117-23 14 0016 BONNIE J LERVIK CITY OF ORONO 2605 LYDIARD CIR PO BOX 66 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 14 0002 38 20-117-23 14 0017 KAREN J O'MALLEY MARILYN H MCCLASKEY 2615 LYDIARD CIR P O BOX 6 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 38 20-117-23 14 0004 38 20-117-23 14 0018 JAMES BERG ANDREW JAMES WHITEHEAD 2655 LYDIARD AVE PAMELA LYNN WHITEHEAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2620 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0005 38 20-117-23 14 0019 CHELSEA V STEINMEYER KOEN BASTIAENS DEVON J STEINMEYER ANN BASTIAENS 2650 KELLY AVE 2565 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 11/7/2017 PARCEL ID: 2011723140026 OWNER NAME: Ellen Redmond Revoc Trust PARCELADDRESS: 2625 Kelly Ave, Orono MN 55331 PARCEL AREA: 3.18 acres, 138,571 sq ft A -T -B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $1,900,000 SALE DATA: 09/2016 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $2,093,000 TAX TOTAL: $26,179.18 ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,866,000 Comments: This data (i) is furnished AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — 2625 Kelly Avenue, Orono Outline of Required Submittals: 14 Adjacent Property owners Acknowledgement Adjacent Property Map: Adjacent Properties: 1. Unassigned 2. 2620 Kelly Ave 3. 2655 Kelly Ave 4. 2605 Kelly Ave Citv Code Sections Sec. 78-912. - Reference to planning commission. Before the council may grant conditional use permits for such conditional uses as prescribed in the district regulations of this chapter, the request shall be referred to the planning commission for study concerning the effect of the proposed use on the ordinance and on the character and development of the neighborhood and for recommendation in regard to granting such conditional use and its conditions, if any, or for the denial of such conditional use. The council may by unanimous action waive reference to the planning commission. (Code 1984, § 10.09(2)) Sec. 78-967. - Exception. (a) The requirements of section 78-966 are not intended to govern the following land alteration activities: (1) Normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or a newly constructed building, or the grading of the driveway serving such building. (2) Any earth movement less than 500 cubic yards which does not adversely impact the existing drainage. (3) Grading, filling or excavating of 50 cubic yards or less within the shore setback zone of all lakes enumerated in article IX of this chapter. (4) The following unusual land alterations: a. Any unusual land alterations, including earth filling, removal or grading, proposed by a builder shall be subject to a permit. The following land alterations shall be considered as unusual land alterations: All excavations for foundations in excess of 12 feet average depth if any amount of the excess material removed below 12 feet depth is to be stockpiled on the site. Any additional fill brought on site outside the Shore land Overlay District, in excess of 500 cubic yards, except for fill required to raise grade for adequate frost footing protection, the intent being that structures shall not be artificially raised above the preexisting surrounding topography. Grading or alterations that would propose any changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent residential lot lines except for drainage swales and ditches. (b) Such grading and earth movement shall be subject to approval by the building inspector at the time of issuance of a building permit, provided that a plan showing proper drainage and protection of adjoining property has been submitted. Where such earth movement is not being performed in conjunction with a building permit, a separate land alteration permit shall be required. (c) The building inspector shall have the authority to refer any requests for land alteration permits to the city council for review and approval in instances where the land alteration appears to potentially create negative impacts or be not in keeping with the goals and policies of the community management plan. (Code 1984, § 10.03(21); Ord. No. 163 2nd series, § 2, 12-8-1997; Ord. No. 171 2nd series, § 1, 4-4-1998; Ord. No. 133 3rd series, § 1, 1-26-2015; Ord. No. 188 3rd series, § 2, 3-22-2017) Sec. 78-1286. - Topographic alterations/grading and filling. (a) Grading and filling and excavations necessary for the construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways under validly issued construction permits for these facilities do not require the issuance of a separate grading and filling permit. However, all grading and filling activity approved permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways shall adhere to the grading and filling standards of this article. (b) Grading, filling or excavating of more than 50 cubic yards is prohibited within 75 feet of the ordinary high water level of the public waters enumerated in section 78-1217. (c) Public and private roads, driveways, parking areas, and public or private watercraft access ramps shall not be constructed within 75 feet of the ordinary high water level of the public waters enumerated in section 78-1217. If no alternatives exist, such improvements shall be subject to the standard zoning variance review procedure, and such review shall take into account the following considerations: (1) Such improvements shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. (2) All roads and parking areas shall be designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the requirements of all agencies with jurisdiction. (d) Except for those projects requiring permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems and driveways, a land alteration permit will be required as follows: (1) For movement of up to 50 cubic yards of material within 75 feet of public waters as per item (b) above, a staff -issued land alteration permit shall be required. (2) For movement of 51 through 500 cubic yards of material anywhere within the Shoreland Overlay District, except for within 75 feet of public waters, a staff -issued land alteration permit shall be required. (3) For movement of more than 500 cubic yards of material within the Shoreland Overlay District, conditional use permit approval by the city council is required in addition to the required land alteration permit. (e) The following considerations and conditions must be adhered to during the issuance of construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals: (1) Grading or filling in any type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: a. Sediment and pollutant trapping and retention; b. Storage of surface runoff to prevent or reduce flood damage; c. Fish and wildlife habitat; d. Recreational use; e. Shoreline or bank stabilization; and f. Noteworthiness, including special qualities, such as historic significance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals, or others. This evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews or approvals by other sections of city ordinances or by other local, state or federal agencies including but not limited to watershed districts, state department of natural resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2) Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. (3) Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible. (4) Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. (5) Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service. (6) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. (7) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the city engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater. (8) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. (9) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner of the department of natural resources under Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (10) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. (11) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. A riprap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of section 78-969. (f) Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons and harbors, are prohibited above the ordinary high water level. Such excavations below the elevation or the ordinary high water level are subject to approval of the department of natural resources and other agencies with concurrent jurisdiction. (Ord. No. 101 2nd series, § 1(10.56(16)(J)), 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 127 2nd series, § 8, 7-11-1994; Ord. No. 163 2nd series, § 3, 12-8-1997; Ord. No. 171 2nd series, § 2, 4-4-1998; Ord. No. 28 3rd series, § 17, 8-22-2005; Ord. No. 133 3rd series, §§ 2, 3, 1-26-2015) AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 20 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3985 — City of Orono Text Amendment Personal Watercraft Regulations on Long Lake Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider an ordinance that would repeal restrictions on Long Lake, and replace with regulations consistent with state statute and the City of Long Lake. 2. Background. On October 9', 2017, the City Council directed staff to draft an ordinance repealing regulations applied to personal watercraft use on Long Lake to make them consistent with recent (September 2017) amendments made by the City of Long Lake. Long Lake lake includes two jurisdictions, the Cities of Orono and Long Lake. Enforcement is primarily conducted by Hennepin County Water patrol. There is a clear benefit of having consistent regulations across the water body. The draft ordinance repeals the existing regulation and replaces it with language consistent with the city of long lake and incorporated state statute rules and regulations by reference. 3. Differences. The main differences unique to the Long Lake lake regulations involved hours and speed of personal watercraft: 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the ordinance as drafted. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. Long Lakes Ordinances Chapter III Exhibit C. Existing Ordinances showing changes. References Exhibit A. State Statute 86B Exhibit B. LMCD Code of Ordinances Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV Rules regulating Personal Watercraft Existing State Statute LMCD Proposed Hours 6 pm or sunset, which ever One hour One hour One hour occurs first and 8 am next day before sunset before sunset before sunset and 9:30 am and 9:30 am and 9:30 am Speed 40 mph daytime, 15 mph No wake within No wake within No wake within nighttime, no wake within 150 of shore 150 of shore 150 of shore 150 of swimmer, moored raft of watercraft, shoreline, dock, or pier. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the ordinance as drafted. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. Long Lakes Ordinances Chapter III Exhibit C. Existing Ordinances showing changes. References Exhibit A. State Statute 86B Exhibit B. LMCD Code of Ordinances Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV ORDINANCE NO. _, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 86-70 REGARDING EXPIRATION OF BUILDING PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City of Orono Code of Ordinances, Chapter 94, Article IV, Regulation of Watercraft on Long Lake is repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. The City of Orono Code of Ordinances, Chapter 94, Article IV, Regulation of Watercraft on Long Lake is adopted as follows. Sec. 94-136. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Lake means the lake known as Long Lake located in the cities of Orono and Long Lake, and designated as Lake Number 27016000 by the state department of natural resources. Personal watercraft means a motorboat that is powered by an inboard motor powering a water jet pump or by an outdoor or propeller -drive motor, and is designed to be operated by a person or persons sitting, standing, or kneeling on the craft, rather than in the conventional manner of sitting or standing inside a motorboat. Sec. 94-137. - Purpose, intent, application. The provisions of Minn. Stats. 8613, Water Safety and Watercraft, Minnesota Rule parts 6110.0100-.2300, boat and safety rules, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this article. Sec. 94-138. - Exempt personnel. All authorized resource management, emergency and enforcement personnel, while acting in the performance of their assigned duties, are exempt from restrictions of this article. Sec. 94-139. - Enforcement. The enforcement of this article shall be the primary responsibility of the peace officers of the county sheriffs department or the Orono Police Department. Other licensed peace officers, Page 1 of 2 including conservation officers of the state department of natural resources and volunteer members of the county water patrol, are also authorized to enforce this article. Sec. 94-140. — Penalties Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Secs. 94-14194-180. - Reserved. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this 13th day of November, 2017 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dermis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2017. Page 2 of 2 17-3985 �'A Mk Long Lake PWC Ordinance Exhibit B C I T Y O F LONG LAKE City of Long Lake Hennepin County, Minnesota Ordinance No. 2017-05 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 40, Waterways, Article V. Personal Watercraft, of the City Code of Ordinances The City Council of the City of Long Lake does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The Long Lake City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 40, Waterways, Article V. Personal Watercraft, is repealed in its entirety. Section 2. The Long Lake City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 40, Waterways, Article V. Personal Watercraft, is adopted as follows: ARTICLE V. PERSONAL WATERCRAFT Sec. 40-131. State and local law incorporated. The provisions of Minn. Stats. 8613, Water Safety and Watercraft, Minn. Stats. 866.313, Personal Watercraft; Regulations, and the rules and regulations of the state department of natural resources promulgated thereunder, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this article. The rules and regulations of the county sheriff's department are incorporated herein and made part of this article. Sec. 40-132. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Lake means the lake known as Long Lake located in the Cities of Long Lake and Orono, and designated as Lake Identification Number 27016000 by the state department of natural resources. Personal watercraft means a means a motorboat that is powered by an inboard motor powering a water jet pump or by an outboard or propeller -driven motor, and is designed to be operated by a person or persons sitting, standing, or kneeling on the craft, rather than in the conventional manner of sitting or standing inside a motorboat. Sec. 40-133. Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to operate a personal watercraft or for the owner to permit the operation of a personal watercraft on the lake in any way which is contrary to the provisions of this chapter; the laws, rules or regulations of the state; or the laws, rules and regulations of the county sheriff's department. Sec. 40-134. Enforcement. The enforcement of this article shall be the primary responsibility of the peace officers of the county sheriff's department or the city's contract Police Department. Other licensed peace officers, including conservation officers of the state department of natural resources, and volunteer members of the county water patrol are also authorized to enforce this article. Sec. 40-135. Exemptions. All authorized resource management, emergency and public safety enforcement personnel, while acting in the performance of their assigned duties, are exempt from the restrictions in this article. Sec. 40-136. Penalties. Any person who violates the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable in accordance with section 1-13. Secs. 40-137 -- 40-141. Reserved. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Long Lake this 19th day of September 2017. Date of Adoption: Date of Publication Effective Date: ATTEST: Jeanette Moeller, City Clerk September 19, 2017 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2017 BY: Marty Schneider, Mayor Council Exhibit C 17-3985 ARTICLE IV. - REGULATION OF WATERCRAFT ON LONG LAKE Sec. 94-136. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Lake means the lake known as Long Lake located in the cities of Orono and Long Lake, and designated as Lake Number 27016000468 by the state department of natural resources. Per -signal wateFGFaft meaRS -;; �.A.�at&rruraft whiGh uses a ME)tE)F PE)WeFiRg a water jet pump as its primaFy rather than the GeR ent oval maRReF of s;ttn-rogorstand'Rg'=rSide the w a+eMraf+ Persons mnGludes an partnership, corporation, or any body of persons whether incorporated in+o a a+inn OF o nr fnrmeld individual, Slow no wake means the operation of a watercraft at the slowest possible speed necessary to maintain stecrane but On no naso greater than five miles per hour. WateFGFaft meaRs aRY and all kiRdS OF types Of fletatiOR Vessels deSigRed f9F 616e OR the water, whethe or not motorozed, including, but not limited to boats, canoes, kayaks, rowing shells, sculls, jet skis, ski doos, pedal Graft, pontoon boats inflatable Grafts tubes, or wind propelled surf boards Personal watercraft means a motorboat that is powered by an inboard motor powering a water jet pump or by an outdoor or propeller -drive motor, and is designed to be operated by a person or persons sitting, standing, or kneeling on the craft. rather than in the conventional manner of sittina or standina inside a motorboat. Sec. 94-137. - Purpose, intent, application. The provisions of Minn. Stats. 86B, Water Safety and Watercraft, Minn. Stats 86B.313, Personal Watrecraft; Regulations, and the rules and regulations of the state department of natural resources promulgated thereunder, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this article. The rules and regulations of the county sheriff's department are incorporated herein and made a part of this article. Sec. 94-138. - Exempt personnel. All authorized resource management, emergency and enforcement personnel, while acting in the performance of their assigned duties, are exempt from restrictions of this article. Page 1 Sec. 94-13949. - Enforcement. The enforcement of this article shall be the primary responsibility of the peace officers of the county sheriff's department or the Orono Police Department. Other licensed peace officers, including conservation officers of the state department of natural resources and volunteer members of the county water patrol, are also authorized to enforce this article. Page 2 rf�) Violation and penalty. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Secs. 94-1414-94-180. - Reserved. Page 3 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 21 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3977, Brian Benson and Chuck Alcon o/b/o Jim and Mary Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road, Sketch Plan Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to provide staff and the applicant non-binding comment on a proposed 5 lot subdivision. 2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable to sketch plans. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant is proposing to subdivide 1400 Bracketts Point into 5 buildable lots. The current improvement on the property includes the former Pillsbury House and several accessory structures. The house will remain, but the structures will be removed. The project has been proposed to meet all minimum development standards, including lot size, width, etc. The plan proposes to relocate Bracketts Point Road from the waters edge on the west side of the parcel, and run it along the interior of the site. The public Brackets Point Road will terminate in a cul de sac at the south end of the site, then a private drive will connect to the existing private Brackets Point Road to serve the three lots at the southern end of the point. The existing sanitary sewer easement within the road will remain, and be protected by an easement. The city engineer has offered preliminary support on the designs of the surface treatment for access. The attached (Exhibit C) staff report to the Planning Commission outlines the project in greater detail. 4. Planning Commission comment. Planning Commissioners questioned grading, housing sizes and styles, and questioned the issues related to relocating the road. The Commissioners did not identify immediate red flags. 5. Public Comment. To date, staff has received no comments for or against the proposal. The Planning Commission advised the applicant to reach out to other residents on the point, which they are in the process of doing. One of these conversations resulted in the modification of the cul de sac, depicted on Exhibit A. The original layout was depicted on Exhibit B. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council provide feedback on the project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Provide non-binding feedback to developer and staff regarding proposed subdivision. Exhibits Exhibit A. Revised Plans Exhibit B. Original Proposed Plans Exhibit C. PC Staff Report Exhibit D. Draft PC Minutes Prepared By: J. Barnhart References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Aerial Photo of Area Reviewed By: _Sb)R Approved By: -TV BRAC.--- P oI�T 17-350 V) w W a- [ I - LI O z O a - U V) W D J Q U W J +' T Q) ° 0 C C O Ca, N °C+ p— Q) O> p C Q) + p O O p Q) 0 3 U C+ Q) ��0� v- p +�4 0 >� 0— Q) 41 C Q) �L Com+ Q) p o ° o C >,0 p O Orn L o Q E Os p= p o41 o° O ON° U) C: �N O O) C 0 Q� Q) 3° CO >`U� V) ° E L U 0°* m 3 Q) C`~ ° N O U E o �'' C 0 n Q) Q) p 0 Q).p lf� L J Q) Q) '' I� tf� Q� p 0 L ° p ° C C ° C + O `+- Q� 7 L L(� - N >, C U Q) UM>,p' O C N+,a) ° pyo0UC OCcai _Oia) ac o� 0 ° Q) �� 0O T0 V)T> 0) 3 p a) o� > > O a) ON a a >,3a 0 +, Q Q = N rn +� +J N U CO C °� O Q) O N �� >�> ° O C C O QL L O� U F 3 N om+ �•�� 3 C 0 ° p+�+ �� Q) °�Q �v0- ° �� Q) Q) C ol() 0 �+�+ p 0 U ate-+ L+ J a0+ Q) O Q v- C LQ) LO, to C Q) (n `' p 0 O° (n 0 7 +� ° CLf) _° � i 0 o U 0 rn p L� °+0-'�_O ° �41 OUmp.p �''�-6 O � (On U) _j- >a QO � Q)) Q�j N 0 C 3 aZ >>� a) 00 p ° °��� 0� U 1 U U 0 °- >. 0 �vOn`' )(DQ)3— o°)-00oLC-CC:4-1 C 0 �cC�Qi�0.0 C�N° O -p 4- -C C 3 ° O Q) '- E C O Q)00 N Q) V) 00 U)Q)°0)n a) 0C 4,OCC �.U) >-0 N ° 0 OD N p �L'�UQ7 0 OO+-p L- 0 E m= 415= %-\N ----- �6a6/ _�QMLPKE aw �\ / / %/ // gpCK FR 2 \ cn m' -- — — // / 5' SET ��\19 ZU \ 0 fi 30 /�` n / FR cv j Council Exhibit A 17-3977 L+Q)N 3 x pN ° '' L -, ,' ""� --150.66 +,°'Q) cOoa)���� @ �a;3�°�(n�>,� >a�(na�a�Q'�'poa )0(n ° 04=' / ]� — a \ \ d \ 6� �;:•. C._ C+ 0 Q) ° U ° p p U L C C C O 0 0 Q) — Q) w \\ \ I \ ° C 0 Q)� C ~� °O C L'C— °= O > O N + ° 0 C—� L C Q)���.° ° (n > O // \�,o�~cn� U CL 0 U v- � Q) O +" + Q) Q) + > ° (n _ Q) > N +� C Q) tf) \ I ( / / I +•.1.. ,. y: 0 Q) + > "' ° C v- 0 ' - Q) C ° Q) + 0 0) C L p (7 Q) (n 'p 0 p — a `- \ _ J �� • ,i O >,Ln Q) N Z Q U �' o C Q) Q) 3 N ° Q) -0 00 Q) U m � ° C p > + — O ° \ Ni \ �+ \ m \ O E L N i U ~ N 3 0-- (n 0 + — v- > pi+� U '' ' (n + 00 U Q) C L Q) Q) ° — / H \ U� \ W '�••" L U+ 0 C Q) C r7 U Q) +- L >, 0 O Q C p p N 3 Ln Z -0 v- � o p 0 0 ° � 031N vo �� Y \ \ (n Cr) Q cn O (n ° `N O o + N >, O° i L O ODD Q) 3 N ° L C Q) p a b Id /— �I ' J X W Z w ¢ \ \� \ /\ ••• i N O + C C L Q) -j- O Q) Q) Q) ° M t Q) + ' ° O Cn p .�., Q) > y Q \ Z ' . +- C rn +- 0 ° ° +t � Q) (n E \ Y 1 z ; O w 0 Q)� C����� U �— >,� +.0 C C Q)°) p Q) C p + O U Q)' + N \ ZU� W 3 W_ =Q H -•i C+ ° o Q) + v- Q) (n C 3 E C Q O +�•- L ) °� p��� p 0 L Q)� 0 >,0U L C`_ °�+ >.� O > ° U ° C C Q) ° (n �mW O m (' N (n \ r \ \ \ JO ,.•. C O (n o o° O Q) L— +' O +' 0 3Q w Z 0 Z Q O Y \� - .,•,.• N pZ._ F� p p >,C N C L° L� C �Q ° Q) � C (n p �� C v . E O O 0 O U Q) N p 3 0 0 O N -° :341 O p 0 0 L 0 C 0°° °� N— C E (nom O' 1� Q \ \ \ \\ Q)-0Q)pa)°Q)°U� a)� 3�cn��o 0°)�Q)°— °(n >,>, 0 .� y — i�� W I I I mp 4 pj�S v- C4- C C -per C-0 0 Q)_ U p-0 Q) 3 C-0 C L �-+-� ° i N _ +' ° -� I p4 ¢ I �Z p p° d C +� °' 0 Q) U p" p L N Q) ._ C N �° ° C ¢ X O 4i I 3RILL] O ° (n � (� N N � � O ° O V) p v- 3 0 , Q) � C N O > C Q) ° « t � � > — C \ 3 I rn W U) ~ \ L Q) E--•-�•-,(n O+� + C O o ° °�+ mQ ° 0+�+ Q) 0 a m n- L in 0 � � U L ++ Q) Q) � 0 � L � w _ j n \ "O p O L O -0 -p C ° C U 0 (n C U 0) C :5 Q) � , - , C Q) � n O Q I `a \ ea ` / Y � �Q I 3\ � \ \ \ \ O ° to 0 � C C Q)co 0-- C Q) v O o ° 0 p H u o w `/ O Q) p�� +, N 0,4 p ° Q) �m O O C � Q) p _ L p 0 Q) p + 3 ` (n (n Q) + \ U W I F- coo, 3e ` ' > ® \" O 14- L 3 p U ° ���>3,� L IP C) C CAQ _ � 0� 4->4- C.zQ) � U 0 m O o O L O > 0) 0, N 5 �''. ' �p • 00 ,YO •OU °i ,° C C C o> X U '_. ° n a�L �+,()Q) >0� W .}, Q °O CnQ ' 4+ Q)� L CL Z ZC -0-0(Li) t +¢ 0)0 Q) LC>_L n(n Q>, n 0 Q) Q) U Q) X X a Q -j Z aC O +' Q6iZ Ci -E E C ° C Q) 0 Q Q) E Q) O ° n °—� -0 CL O , 0 Q) W O0- In N wUO ° L- 3:'U L C O ....... . Ov°U+ C Q)Q) °1 ° /NO (n n �N U+' ' 00 O) m N C: Q) NN m c • ,::: r•:.r: L L O) Q) 3 +, 3 a, ° v- °1 ° r1 Z°° O L O 0 L m -C N !n 3 C 7 C �' t1� C C W \Llys+` p 0 4- OO � (n U C + > O C 1 a-, Q) +, (n Q Q) 0 +, O + + C N U Q) 3 ° +- C 0 (npi \ \ % / / I a U o oo J . •. p p C— C— E,Q) L p L4- : O L �7 0 0 U p+� C+ O �✓ / Q O, Co. 11 Lw`n00)° 0�p._JUoQ)° 0S-0 °°' °U°O _+ ��Q) >,o 0 0 \ \ ,) ,�.,. 0 N L• N n • E Q) � -p Q)>, N C 0 0 C > C N Q) C — C U L .. Q) t(1 \\ / / / /O��O / D- 0) W �= o `° ° ° C Q) Q) (n Q) U) p p Q) m p L ° O T• C (n O 00 p _C 41 -p 0 pC 0L 0L Cm o +,. -0 4-0Q) o�a Q)41Q '—/87�- ---/— O Q ° Q) U Q) C 00 "° . O r N YUQC >C: OC2O )E0U n° �' O S OO D TQ >In 0 -0 16 m �J_. Qp++ d., ++ -4-1 0)0 +, O °)Op Q) + O o U0 3 .p +QJ > °> > O 4-1 + 0Ln Q) L Co{, Q > > CC �O p p 74, :3 C. -LC C Q) E.0 ° J O QO p p p 0QOO�LN�QnC� U +1 Q o� 3 U (n oU c a'L �� ° o ° n n o ° n U U��J PO >0000, .00� CYD r-. <tp .--� MO U-1 10 -+'• �• :• .•, i W m rn°' oin Cv / Z _ O- CD 4\ 0 C\ Lj _ / C \ � W � / /P Y / m am 0o ZN _ ��� 1832 //// rL22' ���\\50LAJ ,rad _ �� \LLJ �-- Lt•J / n �/ 11 29 0 a uU \ / / NTE go \ \ D LLI 147.6 R _ 0 _ �. / _�- 029 W lyU Q +i 00 Q � Q J W ii Q Z J Q Z t— O O 2� Gli a- 1061 p \ \ �o 0 �Ln d- N 0 N L7 ILO 459+ \ \ 330 0 (nDw s, �� \ \ I j \ cS \ � \ �' \ +1 \ \ \ 1 Q / O \\ \\ �Y� \ \ \\ yds. \ � \ \ ,�\ /J � / /� /// Ip z 61 c'•\ 0 om(n \ \ tib LLJ N Li o TZ 4 \ 0 -; l \ / o.�� \\ \\ 30 — — — - RY sEwER \ / / //%//� 0 Of cj� 0 W I—I \; oWN \ 3 �TBACK FROM LAKE — \ // / a o' W C7�Q v ` 0 \7 : !t,, F— Q cfl L W X7.57 — — _ _ NN 0Y LLI Q O U m o0 + w -i 00 / A�b aweQ 00 MZEZ Of (~n Of O H � U m ~ 335± z Q a M N 0 >o 3W oa Qa IoW _ aw o w (n UCLth J Cn zpv) i7-- U (n = z X 1- E- w 3 (n X > W W U � JO LLJUi 0 w W z¢Q a� ¢� zM Ir-oT- D Q) U2 4 L--- O Lf) N' W u)0 L > l N ,—, z O C) - �� E Ln p Z U� Qa ,, `" (n W A z ° J :2 C 0� 0-0a) 0 C4 Ld o (n F�1 �0 t/j Y Q J 0E:3o >-4 Z z - � -0 ° L Q) O VL W C 7 4- a4. °+- A 0 N L Z �0-3 a a O J W z = W z cr- M W � O Z z W Ln O a t -i d- N� ~ rW V ,0 imp*, a� ¢� zM Ir-oT- D Q) 4 L--- O Lf) N' I- u)0 L > l N LL :0Q) O C) - :3 p O N E O 0 U i p Z U 0 p L (n U p 0 >, C C Q) 5 EJ ° J C 0� 0-0a) 0 p U) U) - °oc o (n 41 OJT 0 C 0E:3o -0 ° L Q) 4- W� ° U p C 7 4- a4. °+- °a�0 vi L �0-3 a N Y Q W of Z 0 V) 0 w F- X W H ¢ W F- n Q N O -BR ALT _ -OINT 17-350 Council Exhibit B 17-3977 (f) LLJ ry + I 00 0 o W U) C Q) 0 < 41 0 O.C: W C: Q) QS - --117 --- /I . 11 .... ., -i L.Lj 0 !�, - . = = (:) 0 0 C: 0 0 6-- E o -C LO -C Elf 0 0 0 0 < 4- Q) 0 Vi 41 0 Q) -0 0-1-1-+, Q) 0 a) Q) ID 0 n CD 1) Q) C: 41 C) = 0 - --- -� :3 Q) 'Z - 0 (n C: -54- 0 0 Q) C: 14- - (D 0 -5 0'!� < L C 0 0) E.S 0 O.E _ 'U. _0 m z Q) 0 U E a) 0 04- E 4� 0 (Qn) 4) u-) > 00 C 4� (D 0 O)w 0 -0 LO Wo 5 C: 0 0 N F -- CC) E Co 3' 0 0) :3 0 U-) 0 0') >, :3 0)0 0 0 CN 0 C: 0 Q) :� V) r- -�- YSESB, 0 r- C En Q) 41 Z< 0 -C L- a- -?!N () a) a) 3: w (/) 0). C . ai -9� 6 4- 0 Q) C: C --0 4-- 41 C: 0 U) C: C: > > 0 0 04 Q) CO *5i ---I Q) m .7 C Q) -f:�, r- Q).O >, (n > L- < < 04 U) 0 Q) -7 .2 41 0 0 0 -�, Q>) 0 I C: 4-- -6,2 CI- < Q) Q) Q) 0 O,_,, 0 4.1 _0 1+- (7) L- :3 :3 41 > (n c: Q) 41 -0 0 0 L 41 (n 0 0 0 E Q) C: 0 Ln 41 (1) 0 < t!-- Cc: L- Q) Lr) L6 0 -r- - Q 4- -41:F j7- 1 -�- < 0 C: a w -0) -+, 41 0 0 D 0 0 (n -c > 4- CL 41 0 Y) 0 0 0 41 M -0 C: 4, L- 0 v) (n Q) 4- -- 41 Q) 0 0 0 0 D Q) U) 0 Z C: -0-0-0 0 0 0- C c6 a 0 Q) 3:4 Q) L 0 6 c Ln (D 0 0 3 a�A Q) 0 _j (1) Q) Q) C: -C C) 0 Ln a) 01, 0 L- 4-1 X �O -0 >,41 C: 4� 0.- -0 'in- c: Q) 0 E 4- L() -75' -0 C: C 3: Z -j C: 0:2 a) Q) --I _,-- 75 C: 4� 0 4) OC) =3 N Q) Cf) 00 (n Q) 0) - 0 D D C� (n Q) C: cr) > -0 ()0 0 04, a +, C: C) 0 41 CA. 0 ro 0 Oi 0 -0 -0 :3 %- - CY) C: Q) -E cn 0 0 E ---150.66 0 L Q) C 0) 4 CN 1: x -a c-� 6 o Q) > :3 0o 41 0 C: 0 41 y -,,,,.(n 3: Q) Q) (D (D 41 M > (n < a 4zc - Q) (3) 0 0) Q) Q) Q) 41 0 Q) C) D C 0 c- > q) 4 16 �-4 Ilk c: 4- 0-., 0 WC) 0 0 CN -C� 11 LO CI4 0 2.S (D 41 0-1 6 <> C, .. o C u) (n Q) > b M -Fv E Zi (1) Q) > Q a_ Q) 0 _�_7 41 -041 :3 < L.Li o E >1 - Q)'6 Q) C 0 a) a) 0 LO r.� 0-, 0 C: 0 41 0 Q) Q) Z 0 Q) 19 --C:: a) �- Cn 0 > -C Q) 06 0 w V) E < 0 0 q- C) D 3: 0.- 0 n CO U a _0 -C- \ Fn V) < 4- 0 U Q) >,16 0 C 4- 0 0 0 0 Q) --2 0 00 a) Q) :2 6 0 V) D LLJ = -C (L) -c C s_- Q) U) r (1) 41 0 O Q) Q) 0 14-- 04--l- Q) 0 cf) (1) Z 0 ry z 4- 41 0 Q) C: :t-- 0 4.1 CF) w 3: Q) - (1).0 LIJ 0 Un \18 0 LO r- (1) 0 0 0 Q 41 E LU < 6-C C 4 C- - >, - = 3: C: z — 0 -j "'.. C < 0 Q) (1) U) Q) C: E o 0 4- 0 C: C >.(n 0 > (10 0 0 (n :2 0 U) a) 41 >N LLI -'0 0'- 04-4- Q) 41 Z 0 C: —0 < C:) Z 41 V) ..... 0 0 0 Q) C: LJ Z < 0 C: Q) Q) U) - o :3 Q) Q) L- (v C -4., 0 -�, -0 < F- ...... Q) 4.1 U:3 0:-6 .Ln Q) E 0 a) (D (n 3: Qu)) o Q) E) D C: (3) U Q) 0 C: 3. -T -'-' * y 3: -<V) E 0) Q) Q) 0 -0 Q) m 0)*E -C 4- C: 14-- C C: (D -0 C- C: -0 04- V) C: -0 C: C) -0 0 0 OQ LLJ 41 0 0 C) 0- C: 41 0'6 i5 \ \ \ / C 0 0 C: T5 -0, 0 - w W.- �, (f) X 0 z N r, W Q) .6 Q) 4� 4�: 0 0 D C 41-0 4- 0 > C 0 -c c- > LLI V) C 0 0 L- 41 _0 0 < sw -0 0 04-1 0 a 0 0 -0 4� M < Q) Q) 0 it z ,'- 03 E (n W (cl): ' 3� cn,-j CL _a 0 _a 0 0 .- C: -C (1) C U (1) -C 0 0) C: Q) :3 :D 0 Q) D Q- a. 0 :3 0 0-�.- o t,:t, (ql)) .2):Lz) 0-- (1) - 0 0' o(L C Q) (n *6 0 W r- CY)a 3-. > U) 0 L- 0 0 �O U4- 41 04 C) -,4- 0 a - 0 0 4� LAJ C: Q) Q) a (1) (1) C) , a) U IpO Cf C: C: N -,d- Q) 41 V) 0 -0 In 41 -C � I >, :3 (D > 0 C: _0 \ i�� <> yoo I \ O . -?. >, Q) 41 :3 > C: 4- 0 (D -4- C: 41 4� LO Q) Q) (D 0- 0 (D OCA L 0 C :3 () 0 " Q) -A L- . : - - _N 0 . E R� 0 0 > 4-- > C Q) a) 0) ::3 D cn U) m 0 < 0 -C L) 0 0 0 0 L 0 L 0) 0 L C: 00 0) �.L:Y)-O - C C: E: X C- (1) C: 0)41 0 Q) c)) Cp -0 CO F- 0 (n 4- > Q) C: Q) . / 0 0- 0 0 > 0-0 0 C 0 > 0 D < 0) 0 I+- L� .6 4� 'S 6 0 0 -0 0 -04 U) < Q) cn z z 0 -0, -C > V) (D 4- 4� (.0 < �X _0 41 -Z -C -i — '- -0 -0 Q) X < z 4' 0 Q) 0 E L 0< f. . .. .. \.� C C) (1) C 0) Q) Q) L) r- U) .(I) ; 0 L!P\ -1- 0 0 C: 4--4--0 C < (L),,__ >, 4- (1) (D Q) X CL Q) 4, C L- -0 L- -0 - >, :D 0 0 < D C�. 0 (n (D (i) 4- (L) 75 0 0 C) U 41 0 0 < > U) (1) Q) 0 1 rr, C: 41 L- 0 -2 L- Q) C: LLJ 31: 0 E 0 C 0 Q- -C Q) a) 0 C: U) (1) 0 +1 7, (1) (1) 0, 2) 0 U) CY) — a) 0 C) 00 0) 41 Q) (1) Q) 0) (1) 00 0 41 C: L 4- �01 0- m 0 0 00 E 0 0 L -C C'4 0 -J 41 CY) 04- C) 0 0 1— 0 m c- 0 w :t,- Ln -) >,— -0 -0 (1) :2 c: 4- 70 00 (1) _C: 0 Q) 41 = (C) rr) U-0 0 0 C >,L( CY) 0 - 0 0 (5:5 (f) CL 0 Q) 0 41.,, _g- Q) Q) 3:4- 0 Q 0) 0 ..... U) 141 Q) 0) 0- 0 _0 _0 0 41o6 > 0 C 0 0 (,) 00 41 4' 0 F- :3 -C 0;e 4- -2!', 0 C: 0) :3 0 C: L_ L- o L- Q) L) 4� 0 a C > U) Q) cn -�.7 w 6 a V) CN 0 (n 0 0:� 41 0 0.0) (3) E _0 0 0 a) 0 C i-6 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 Q) L _0 -0 Q) 0 ) 0 0 LLJ 0 0 4� C: C: 0 af 0 E Q) C: 4 0-)— 4. (D 0) 0 -0 -C: 0.0 C (n 0 -0 a) Q) >� Q) 0 m 0 U) 0 Q) -�X C: C: U -E I_- F- 0-0)-04-- 0 Q) a) 0 0 Q) (n Z 00 T 0 E 0 0 < Z C: �, 0-+1 0 Q) 0 E- Q) a 0 W 41 -'7 Ln 0) 0 > (D > W'U 4� C 00 4, 0 Q) 0 -C >%< - C: () 41 >.,n V) 0 -0 (04- 0 -1 0 0 4.1 0 0 Q).S 4- 41 1 0,5i 0 C: 0 L- 4, 0 T: 0i 0 Q) C owm a_a; LO Q) C: C) C: Q) Q) a- C) Q) M. -j L- 4-. C: 1 (1) 5 0 Q) 0 0 -54- E C Q Q) C > 0) > Cp 0 Q� 5 -4-1 01 41 4.1 :3 C.- L_ C C L C: 41 > > C: -.S D 0 :3 011— I- 0 a q- E E 0 0 0 0 w V Qm) 0 0 0 0) 4- Uj 0 0 < U) C) a- 04- 04- -q- 41 < o -1 00 (CJ3),-5:\= 00 C: O -,E fy -0 0 0 W W 0 0 W 0 04-4141 < CA < w P- ry LO + aq It LO C-4 O\P F- mo CDO N/ z LIJ 0 C, eO000, LLJ �d U) M 0 0 V) V) < 3; 00 0 Cf) D W X > 0 PON X 00(y F- 00) 0 0 1�- Wwn B3. Li 01 3;131 4<1 C) 0 A0129 00,1 40 0 < 0 C:) C,4r, 0 00— <\ 0 04 0 z 0, D Uj CL 0 0 m V) -1 o 00 �-Os m LU rn -6 14-7.06 < > X _j Cr- RO + m 0 C -A .00 \ 30 Aor)�J- C1. Q- 0 )SL X z n 45 < U 5 in v) a_ . .. ........... CL LLJ 30 1 LD Lu V) Cn < 0 Cn D Lij �610 0 0 cr_ "A A < \ \ I \ f / / �' / / /�/ P=1 0 \ v> ' \ (3 IL L0+1 < X LO LO 0 -J- It z < xk Ld 5 M V) +1 -i �-- Ld / //// // O M LJ 0 /Z 0 LLJ Z C V - z V) -j V) U) < C� 43 0 o (f) D LLJ V) A > 0 z >- r) < 0 z (if 0z �g: 0 Ld < 0 of 0r \ — Of 0 wX \ /� HDPE \—` / //j // 4)kUj 0 E-4 F- Y > < i- cr- z 0 iSETBACK FROM L KE anj Vv)) � LJ A \ z \ C O<Z a- X < Z z < V) FSI 0 U) 0 C) 0) . - . 11 0 �,- W- -A-(�,7.5 7 ', ., !: I! - 39� — X=9 F- < 04 — — w �- �- ........ . — 3: V) F- > Ld Ui X Irnoo www LLJ '777-- 04 0 > 0 PON 0<0 Um 00 + LLJ 0 j 00 > < 00 m (r (n w 0 z Lij LLJ �-00 m OZO 335+- Z<< F -- U LLI D 0 ry a z Ln 2Q) L() Z z (p LO 0 Q) aLO r1r) LO E 0 0 41 > \Z Cn a) CEL z 0) 0 ,4 Li C: 0 < _j C: 0J: 0 0 > 0_j 41 V) LLJ > E E Z F) N Ln C�6 CD - 3- CY) 0 0 C z z P-1 0 z z W Lo 0 > 0 0,0 F -- U LLI D 0 ry a w 0 O Ln 2Q) L() CI4 0 Q) 0 E 0 0 41 > \Z Cn a) CEL 0) 0 Q) 41 0 C: 0 C: C: 0J: C: Cc- E -a:3 0) 41 E C: 0 CD 0 C w 0 Date Application Received: September 20, 2017 Date Application Considered as Complete: September 20, 2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: N/A To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: October 16, 2017 Council Exhibit C 17-3977 Subject: #17-3977, Brian Benson and Chuck Alcon o/b/o Jim and Mary Jundt, 1400 Brackets Point Road, Sketch Plan Application Summary: The applicant is requesting comments via the sketch plan process for a proposed subdivision of the 13.78 acre parcel into 5 single family residential lots and a realignment of Brackets Point Road. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission is asked to give feedback on the proposed development. Background The property is 13.78 acres and lies near the southern end of Brackets Point. Improvements on the property include the existing residence, formerly the Pillsbury House, a pool and tennis courts and accessory recreational buildings, and a greenhouse complex. Bracketts Point Road enters the property at the north end then cuts to the west side, running along the Lakeshore. Public Bracketts Point Road terminates at hammer head turnaround, then continues on as a private road, serving 4 other lots at the southern end of the peninsula. Within Bracketts point road is a sanitary sewer that serves the area. The proposed is zoned LR -1A One Family Residential, requiring 2 acres of dry buildable land per lot. All lakeshore lots require 200 feet of frontage at the lake and at the 75 foot lake yard setback. Proposal Comprehensive Plan. The project as proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of density. Lots. The project is being proposed so as to avoid the need for any variances, to conform to the subdivision requirements. All 5 lots meet the minimum lot area requirements, ranging in size from 2.15 cares to 3.18 acres. All lots meet the lot width requirements, with the narrowest lot is lot 2 is 202 feet at the lake, but widens further from the lake. Existing lots on Brackett Point range in size from 1.11 to 3.37 acres. Each proposed lot maintains a reasonable house area, appropriately setback from the lake and the road. Average Lake Shore setback. When developing new lakeshore lots, it is necessary to establish an average lake shore setback for all lots as part of the formal plan approval. The location of neighboring homes will influence the average lake shore setback for lots within the FILE # 17-3977 October 16, 2017 Page 2 of 2 development. Access. The main policy question: Does the Council support the relocation of Brackets Point Road? The developers propose relocating Brackets point to run more through the middle of the site, preserving lake views for the 5 lots. This will also serve to remove hardcover within the lake yard of proposed lots 3, 4, and 5. The southern terminus is proposed as a cul de sac, with separate drives to maintain access to the private Bracketts Point Road. Brackets point road currently serves 9 buildable lots, one of which is undeveloped. The northern terminus of Bracketts Point is Shoreline Drive, near a sharp curve. The Developer should seek County input on appropriate improvements at this intersection. The Developer should also provide an exhibit to illustrate that emergency vehicles can make the proposed turn onto private Bracketts Point Road. Grading/ stormwater management. Grading plans have not been developed at this sketch plan stage. It is expected that the relocation of the public road will trigger stormwater retention requirements within the project. Utilities. All sites will be served by municipal sanitary sewer and onsite wells. The existing sanitary sewer along the west side of the property will remain. Staff has discussed protecting that service with an easement, and installation of a semi -permeable surface treatment to maintain access to the man holes for servicing. The Developer will need to provide calculations to confirm that existing sewer can accommodate the additional lots. Conservation design. A Conservation design plan will need to be completed as required by city ordinance because the site is greater than 5 acres. A number of trees will need to be removed to facilitate the road realignment and house construction. The Conservation design should include analysis of these trees, and the Development should provide plans for revegetation. Issues for Consideration Does the Planning Commission have any issues with relocating Bracketts Point Road? Is the scale of tree removal anticipated appropriate for this property? Does the Planning Commission find any other issues or concerns with this application? List of Exhibits Exhibit A Application Exhibit B Narrative Exhibit C Sketch Plan Exhibit D Aerial photos of area Council Exhibit D MINUTES OF THE 17-3977 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 11. #17-3977 BRIAN BENSON ON BEHALF OF JIM AND MARY JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, SKETCH PLAN, 9:45 P.M. —10:05 P.M. Brian Benson, Builder, was present. Barnhart stated before the Planning Commission is a sketch plan proposal for a 5 -lot single family residential development. The property consists of 13.78 acres and lies near the southern end of Brackets Point Road. The purpose of the sketch plan review is to obtain the feedback from the Planning Commission on some of the issues associated with developing this piece of property. The main issue is the access to the site. Bracketts Point Road enters the property at the north end and then cuts to the west side. Within Bracketts Point Road is an existing sanitary sewer line that serves the area. The property owner is proposing to vacate the road, relocate it to the interior of the site, retain the existing sanitary sewer line and protect it with an easement with specific site improvements to protect access. The southern end is proposed as a cul-de-sac, with separate drives to maintain access to the private road. Barnhart stated the main policy question is whether shifting the road into the interior of the property is acceptable. Staff will continue to make sure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. Barnhart noted by virtue of adding four new lots onto the subject property, traffic will increase on Bracketts Point Road and will also impact its connection with Shoreline Road to the north. Input from the County is necessary to determine whether any improvements are necessary at this intersection. The proposal to relocate the road to the interior of the road will help remove hardcover within the lake yard of proposed Lots 3, 4, and 5. The other issue is the establishment of average lakeshore setback. When new lake lots are created, the average lakeshore setback needs to be established at the time of subdivision. It is Staff's belief that the existing sanitary sewer line will be adequate to service the additional homes but that will need to be verified. Page 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lastly, a Conservation Design Plan will need to be completed. A number of trees will need to be removed to facilitate the road realignment and house construction. Barnhart noted this project has been designed with the intention of following city ordinances in terms of lot size, lot frontage, and things of that nature. Barnhart stated at the present time no variances appear to be necessary. Thiesse stated he sees this as a Lakeview type development where it is quite critical that everything be met. Thiesse asked what the ramifications are with relocating the road. Barnhart pointed out there are property owners that are not part of this subdivision who may want to retain the access as it is now. Thiesse stated he was thinking on the north end. Barnhart illustrated the path of the proposed roadway, noting that the existing lots would still maintain their access. City Administrator Rief asked if the road would remain public after it is moved. Barnhart indicated it would. Landgraver asked what the pros and cons are of leaving the sewer line where it is. Barnhart stated the cost to relocate the sewer line would be pretty expensive. Thiesse stated the City would need to have vehicular access to that area. Rief stated one of the concerns with moving the sewer line is the need for lift stations. Landgraver asked if there is any additional maintenance cost with leaving the septic line. Page 2 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated having the road as access makes it easier and that there will probably be some additional impacts but that the City Engineer has reviewed it briefly and did not raise any concerns with relocating it. Leskinen commented having the road go down the middle might be better for the lake since it would help with salt runoff and hardcover. Barnhart stated having the road by the lake also provides some benefit to the area in terms of lake views. Chuck Alcon stated since they submitted their plan, they have met with the fire chief, which led to the basis of the radius of the cul-de-sac. The road would also improve emergency vehicles access. Alcon stated they also met with LMCD staff, and since there will be no marina, each property owner will be responsible to permit their own docks on their lakeshore. Alcon indicated they also met with the MCWD staff, and they are eager to get the road off the lakeshore. The proposal is to maintain the sewer line and provide an easement using grass pavers so the maintenance trucks can get down there. A wetland delineation has been completed and that has been submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Alcon indicated they will have that information for the preliminary plat. Attempts have been made to contact the property owners in the area and that those attempts have not been successful at the present time. Alcon indicated they will continue to make attempts to contact them. Alcon stated shifting of the road improves the lake quality and that they will contact Hennepin County as far as the additional traffic going onto County Road 15. Onsite ponding and infiltration are the current concepts for the stormwater management onsite and sanitary sewer capacity calculations will be provided at the time of preliminary plat. Sanitary sewer maintenance access will be along the existing roadway area but with grass pavers. The grass pavers will accommodate up to 88,000 pounds. Alcon noted a Conservation Design Plan is required and that they will provide that at preliminary plat. Page 3 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Alcon stated the two major items are relocating the road, which will help the lake quality, and then maintaining the sanitary sewer. No new lift stations are required and quite a bit of hardcover will be removed down near the lake. Alcon noted water will be provided via private wells and the underground storage tank that was for fire protection will be removed because the fire chief has indicated he would not use it. Lemke asked if there are any issues with the grass pavers. Alcon stated to his knowledge there are not and that Mark Gronberg is the surveyor on the project and he has used them in the past at the Long Lake Library. Thiesse encouraged him to get in touch with the neighbors. Brian Benson noted they have a meeting scheduled with the owner who owns two of the three lots on Monday and that they have also reached out to a couple of other people but have gotten no response. Another neighbor asked whether the main house is staying and the other family is moving. Alcon noted the 45 -foot radius continues on through the corner and connects into the private road as opposed to the curved hammerhead. Schoenzeit asked how the proposed grading for the homes will compare to what is there. Alcon stated they will be custom graded lots. Benson stated they might do a custom grading plan for Lot 5 since it is low and flat. Schoenzeit asked if these homes will have foundations or be slab on grade. Benson indicated Lot 2 would be a walkout, Lot 3 would be a walkout, Lot 4 might be a lookout, and then Lot 5 will likely need to be built up. Benson stated they are waiting to get feedback from this meeting and then they will explore that a little bit more. Page 4 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Alcon stated all that information will be provided at the time of preliminary plat. Landgraver asked what the rough square footage of the homes will be. Benson stated the lots would be sold to end buyers and they would work with the City on their individual building plans. Benson stated they are not planning on having any architectural covenants placed on the property but that there would be an association for the pond. Alcon stated the association will probably have some architectural control. Lemke asked if an casement for the sewer connection will be needed for Lot 1. Alcon stated the necessary easements will be provided. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. Page 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 22 Date: November 13, 2017 Item Description: Resolution Supporting Orono Parks, Green Spaces, Playgrounds, & Trails in Perpetuity Presenter: Dustin Rief Agenda City Administrator City Administrator Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval for a resolution supporting Orono Parks, Green Spaces, Playgrounds, & Trails. 2. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Resolution Supporting Orono Parks, Green Spaces, Playgrounds, & Trails in Perpetuity. Exhibit Exhibit A. Resolution Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -'bg CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF ORONO KEEPING ITS OPEN SPACES, PLAYGROUNDS, PARKS, AND TRAILS IN PERPETUITY WHEREAS, Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks and Trails are critical to our quality of life; and WHEREAS, Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails bolster our recreation; and WHEREAS, quality and well-maintained Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails enhance our personal health, community pride, and sense of place, including neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, a group of citizen volunteers has worked tirelessly and for many years on behalf of all residents in the City of Orono, actively engaging hundreds of individuals and groups in conversation regarding the needs and opportunities of the Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails systems; and WHEREAS, thousands of residents over the years have participated in and supported adoption of the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan and citizen survey, and all these plans and efforts support enhancing and keeping Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails in perpetuity; and WHEREAS, Open Spaces, Parks, Playgrounds, and Trails are identified as one of the best investments citizens and cities can make in their children as playgrounds provide children critical unstructured, outdoor, creative and active play; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council wishes to support the Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails to provide the many benefits to local residents in perpetuity. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Orono adopt this resolution in support of the Open Spaces, Playgrounds, Parks, and Trails to be kept in perpetuity. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 13th day of November, 2017. Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk