Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRestoration project r7pi ■►., . . .� F311 APPLIED APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES SPECIALISTS IN ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE,RESTORATION,MANAGEMENT,AND RESEARCH 21938 MUSHTOWN RD•PRIOR LAKE,MN 55372 MEMORANDUM TO: James Wisker and Courtney Hall (MCWD) FROM: Kim Chapman and Doug Mensing DATE: September 15, 2014 RE: Nelson Restoration (12-0975)—Comparison of Existing vs. Proposed Biota OVERVIEW Applied Ecological Services(AES) prepared this memorandum to provide more details about existing biological communities at the Nelson Restoration wetland. We compare this to the biological communities we anticipate will result from restoration activities. In brief,the site's wetland currently consists primarily of a degraded Shallow Marsh,dominated by invasive cattails, purple loosestrife,and reed canary grass. The proposed wetland is designed to consist of a large,diverse Wet Meadow with an area of Deep Marsh. EXISTING VS.PROPOSED BIOTA The following table provides metrics for comparing existing and proposed biological communities(pre-and post-construction)at the Nelson Restoration site wetland. Some existing conditions values were estimated. All proposed conditions values were estimated. Proposed conditions are for two to three years post-construction. Estimates were based on our professional experience in comparable wetlands in the region and expected, realistic restoration outcomes. Category Metric Under Existing Under Proposed Conditions Conditions Size Shallow Marsh(acres) 2.4 0 Fresh Wet Meadow(acres) 0.3 2.2 Hardwood Swamp(acres) 0.3 0.3 Deep Marsh(acres) 0 0.5 Vegetation Percent Invasive Cover(96) Condition 90 <20 Tree Species Richness(#) 4 6 Shrub Species Richness(#) 4 8 Grass Species Richness(#) 3 1012 Sedge Species Richness(#) 2 10±2 Forb Species Richness(#) 15 30±5 Wildlife Use Bird Species Richness(annual,#) 6* 18±4 Amphibian Species Richness(breeding,#) 0* 4±1 Dragonfly/Damselfly Species Richness(#) 4* 12±2 Fish Species Richness(#) 0 2±2 Note: *Values based on site-specific field data collected by AES in 2014. Sustainable Solutions for Over 30 Years. www.appliedeco.com We lack data on pollinator species richness(bee,fly, beetle, moth, butterfly,etc.). However, given the low forb richness and abundance at the site currently,and the expected increase in forb richness and abundance as a result of the restoration, it is likely that pollinators will increase in presence and abundance. Vegetation monitoring and reporting is proposed to continue for three years to ensure that performance standards are met for restored wetland vegetation.Wildlife monitoring and reporting was initiated in 2014,with two sampling rounds completed,and a third planned for late September/early October. These pre-construction wildlife data are being collected to document the response of birds,frogs,toads,dragonflies,and damselflies to the restoration project. Post-construction monitoring data will be compared to pre-construction data in order to document changes in presence and abundance of these groups in response to the restoration project. 2 I MN Board of Water and Soil Resources REPLACEMENT WETLAND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Project type: ® Project Specific ❑ Wetland Banking Monitoring year: 2015 growing season PROJECT INFORMATION Landowner Name: Site ID#: Dr. Glen Nelson NA Applicant(if different from landowner): Account#: See above NA Project Name: Bank Area(acres): US ACE#: Nelson Restoration NA NA County: Legal Description:Orono Township Hennepin Sect. 5 T. 117N. R.23W. Report prepared by: Date: Applied Ecological Services, Inc. December 16, 2015 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Nelson Restoration project entails ecological restoration/enhancement of a 2.98-acre severely degraded shallow cattail marsh, plus enhancement of an additional 2.68 acres of upland buffer located in Orono Township, Minnesota (Figure 1). Pre-construction wetland vegetation was dominated by invasive cattails, purple loosestrife, and reed canary grass. Using the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM), the wetland scored as "Low" to "Moderate" in almost every category, with Vegetative Diversity/Integrity scoring "Low"for all wetland plant communities present. In early 2015, in compliance with acquired permits, approximately 2,588 cubic yards of wetland soils (:54 ft deep) were excavated from a 0.5-acre portion of the wetland in order to create an area of Deep Marsh habitat and to control invasive vegetation (Figure 2). The upper foot of soil (approximately 807 cubic yards) was infested with propagules of invasive vegetation (including cattail tubers and purple loosestrife seeds), and therefore was removed from the site. The remainder of the excavated material was thin-spread (:51 ft thick) over lower portions of the wetland to a maximum elevation of 964.5 feet, lower than the elevation of the delineated wetland boundary, in order to maintain wetland conditions and create saturated Wet Meadow habitat (Figure 2). In order to maintain possible flows in the wetland, two meandering swales were constructed between the Deep Marsh area and two existing culverts beneath Tonkawa Road. The project is expected to restore the wetland to a diverse habitat complex of native MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 1 Wet Meadow, Deep Marsh, and Enhanced Lowland Forest. Surrounding upland buffer areas are also being restored through removal of invasive plant species such as common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica),garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), and narrowleaf bittercress(Cardamine impatiens). In addition, native trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants, and seeds have been installed to diversify the upland buffers. In 2015,two rain gardens were constructed to manage and treat 1.42 acres of suburban runoff prior to entering the wetland. A pre-existing compost pile located near the wetland was re-graded and stabilized, and will be planted with native vegetation. The project will result in "no-loss" of wetland quantity, quality, or biological diversity. Rather, wetland functions and values are expected to increase significantly, largely due to the increase in uncommon native Wet Meadow habitat. Additionally, the created Deep Marsh area will provide greater habitat diversity within the wetland, benefitting native waterfowl and waterbirds (previously not able to use the wetland), as well as provide habitat for aquatic macroinvertebrates(such as dragonflies and damselflies), reptiles, amphibians, and possibly small fish. In 2016, basking logs (for turtles,frogs, and other wildlife) will be installed at the edges of the Deep Marsh, and the upland buffer will also be enhanced by installation of wood duck nest boxes and a bat house. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 2 MANAGEMENT HISTORY. Ecological management activities that have occurred at the site since early 2014 are listed below. Table 1. Ecological management activities Timeframe Activity Mar-Apr 2014 Removed invasive brush May 2014 Removed invasive herbs(sprayed garlic mustard) May 2014 Cut dead brush/snags August 2014 Broadcast herbicide September 2014 Broadcast herbicide September 2014 Planted native trees and shrubs Sept-Oct 2014 Installed woodchip trail November 2014 Foliar spraying(forest) January 2015 Removed compost pile;finished thatch removal February 2015 Scraped top foot of soil and excavated Deep Marsh March 2015 Installed native seeds,excavated Deep Marsh April 2015 Installed erosion control and woodchip trail May 2015 Cleaned up buckthorn mulch pile June 2015 Herbicided for rain garden prep and wetland management(invasive cattails and reed canary grass) July 2015 Installed native emergent plants August 2015 Mowed compost slope August 2015 Collected and distributed loosestrife beetles to attempt biological control Aug-Sept 2015 Constructed first rain garden Aug-Sept 2015 Clipped/removed purple loosestrife flowers(to prevent seed drop) Aug-Sept 2015 Constructed second rain garden METHODS Vegetation and hydrology monitoring were conducted at the site on September 2, 2015, near the end of the first growing season following wetland reconstruction. Plant species observed during meander searches and percent cover were recorded by major plant community type (i.e., Wet Meadow, Deep Marsh, Enhanced Lowland Forest and Enhanced Upland Forest).Total invasive and native species cover in the wetland were estimated using weighted averages of mapped species populations. Because surface water outlets were not modified as part of the restoration project, hydrology was documented simply by mapping locations of inundation and saturation throughout the wetland. This enabled an assessment of restoration success in terms of achieving the intended hydrologic regime of the Wet Meadow, which was saturated soil conditions. Site photography was also used to document vegetation communities, surface water hydrology, and other site conditions. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 3 RESULTS Vegetation The Nelson Restoration site consists of several plant communities, which have been classified as Wet Meadow(approximately 38%of the site), Deep Marsh (approximately 9%of the site), Enhanced Lowland Forest (approximately 14%of the site) and Enhanced Upland Forest (approximately 37%of the site). Figure 2 illustrates the site's designed plant communities, and Table 2 represents the acres planned and observed for each plant community. Table 2.Vegetative communities planned and observed: Plant Community Acres Planned Acres Observed Wet Meadow* 2.14 2.14 Deep Marsh* 0.50 0.50 Enhanced Lowland Forest(wetland portion)* 0.35 0.35 Enhanced Lowland Forest(upland portion) 0.47 0.47 Enhanced Upland Forest 2.07 2.07 Wetland Edge Plantings(road bank ofTonkawa Road) 0.08 0.08 Rain Garden (Wet Meadow) 0.05 0.05 Total Wetland Area 2.98 2.98 Total Upland Area 1 2.68 2.68 Total Area 5.66 5.66 *Vegetation communities used to calculate Total Wetland area. Restored/enhanced plant communities reflected the acres designed, but the geometry of the Deep Marsh was adjusted during construction (Figure 3). This field adjustment consisted of shifting the Deep Marsh slightly west to avoid excavation of the shallower wetland soils at the eastern edge of the existing wetland. The 0.5-acre size of the designed Deep Marsh was maintained. • Wet Meadow-Thirty-two plant species were documented in the Wet Meadow; dominant species included tall manna grass (Glyceria grandis), curlytop knotweed (Persicaria lapathifolia), and purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). In addition to the "plant community" species list and percent coverages, a 10mx10m plot was established in this dominant plant community to provide a more detailed assessment of a representative area (Figure 3). Table 3a presents all plant species documented in the site's Wet Meadow as well as the Wet Meadow plot. • Deep Marsh- Eight plant species were documented in the Deep Marsh;the most dominant species (10%cover)was narrow-leaved cattail (Typha angustifolia) or its hybrid. Table 3b presents all plant species documented in the site's Deep Marsh. • Enhanced Lowland Forest-Thirty-one species were documented in the Enhanced Lowland Forest; dominant species included green ash (Froxinus pennsylvanica), spotted MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 4 touch-me-not (impatiens capensis), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Table 3c presents all plant species documented in the site's Enhanced Lowland Forest. • Enhanced Upland Forest-Thirty-five species were documented in the Enhanced Upland Forest plant community; dominant species included green ash, silver maple (Acer saccharinum), Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), and box elder(Acer negundo). Table 3d presents all plant species documented in the site's Enhanced Upland Forest. Table 3. Plant Species Observed at Nelson Restoration Site in Hennepin county,September 2,2015. 3a.Wet Meadow %areal cover Overall Common name Scientific Invasiveific name Indicator Status" Status"" Strata 100 mZ Plot Wet within Community heart-leaved water plantain Alismosubcordatum OBL N H <3 3 swam milkweed Ascle ias incornoto OBL N H <1 oats Avena sativo UPL I H <1 <1 nodding bur marigold Bidenscernua OBL N H <1 awl-fruited sedge Carex sti ata OBL N H 1 fox sedge Carex vul inoidea FACW N H 4 3 bul b-beari ng water hemlock Cicutobulb'era OBL N H <1 yellow nutsed e Cyperus esculentus FACW I H <1 <1 cocks ur barnyard grass Echinochloa crus- olll FACW I H 3 <3 marsh s ikerush Eleochoris cfpolustris OBL N H 1 willowherb E ilobiums N H <1 <1 tall manna grass Glycerin grandis OBL N H 29 21 foxtaiI barley Hordeum'ubatum FAC N H <1 nth rush Juncus tenuis FAC N H 1 1 Torre 's rush Juncus torre i FACW N H 4 1 rice cut grass Leersio oryzoides OBL N H 3 1 purple loosestrife L thrum solicaria OBL I SN PI H 21 21 blue monkey flower Mimulusrin ens OBL N H 1 mild water-pepper Persicariahydropiper OBL N H 3 4 curlytop knotweed Persicaria la othi olio FACW N H 21 29 pickerelweed Pontederia cordata OBL N H <1 cottonwood Populus deltoides FAC N H 1 <1 kidney-leaved buttercuRanunculusobortivus FACW N H <1 <1 hooked crowfoot Ranunculus recurvotus FACW N H <1 blackwillow Salix cf nigra OBL N H 1 <1 river bulrush Schoeno lectusfluviatilis OBL N H <1 soft stem bulrush Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani OBL N H <1 woolgrass Scir us cyperinus OBL N H 1 1 woundwort iStachyspalustris OBL N H <1 winterwheat Triticumaestivum UPL I I H <1 <1 narrow-leaved cattail Typho an usti olio OBL I I H 6 19 blue vervain Verbena hastata FACW N H <1 %areal cover invasives 27 40 %areal cover natives 74 76 "Native Status: N=native to the state of MN,I=Introduced,U=Undetermined(per MnDNR 2013). ""Invasive Status: FN=Federal noxious weed,SN=State prohibited noxious weed,RN=State restricted noxious weed,PI=DNR Prohibited invasive species, PS=State prohibited weed seed,RS=State restricted weed seed(per MnDNR 2013). Strata:V(woody vine),H(herb layer),S(saplings and shrubs),T(tree). 100m=Plot:30x10m quadrant;The SW plot corner is located 10 meters east of photo reference point 5(450723.77 N,4979601.83 E,+/-10 m). Cover values of<1 were treated as 0.5 for calculations. red font=invasive species of concern. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 5 Table 3. Plant Species Observed at Nelson Restoration Site in Hennepin County,September 2,2015. 3b.Deep Marsh %areal cover Overall Common Name Scientific name Indicator Native Invasive Strata within Status" Status" Deep Marsh Community heart-leaved water plantain Alisma subcordatum OBL N H 4 nodding bur marigold Bidens cernuo OBL N H <1 bulb-bearing water hemlock Cicuto bulb'era OBL N H <1 tall manna grass Glycerin grandis CBL N H 1 purple loosestrife L thrumsolicorio OBL I SN,PI H <1 ickerelweed Pontederio cordata CBL N H 1 broad-leaved arrowhead ISagittoria lati olio OBL N I H <1 narrow-leaved cattail Typho an usti olio OBL I H 10 areal cover invasives 10.5 %areal cover natives L 7.5 *Native Status: N=native to the state of MN,I=Introduced,U=Undetermined(per MnDNR 2013). **Invasive Status: FN=Federal noxious weed,SN=State prohibited noxious weed,RN=State restricted noxious weed,PI=DNR Prohibited invasive species,PS=State prohibited weed seed,RS=State restricted weed seed(per MnDNR 2013). Strata:V(woody vine),H(herb layer),S(saplings and shrubs),T(tree). Cover values of<1 were treated as 0.5 for calculations. red font=invasive species of concern. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 6 Table 3. Plant Species Observed at Nelson Restoration Site in Hennepin County,September 2,2015. 3c.Enhanced Lowland Forest %areal cover Overall Common Name Scientific name indicator Native Status* Invasive Status** Strata within Lowland Forest Community boxelder Acerne undo FAC N T 1 green ash Froxinus pennsylvanica FACW N T 15 bur oak Quercus macrocar o FAC N T 3 basswood Tilia americana FACU N T 3 river birch Betula nigra FACW N S 2 tamarack Larix laricina FACW N S 2 common buckthorn Rhamnus cothartico FAC I RN S 10 red-berried elder Sambucus racemoso FACU N S 1 American elm Ulmusamericona FACW N S 1 Virginia creeer Parthenocissus quinquefolia FACU N V 2 wild grape Vitis riparia FACW N V 1 white snakeroot A eratino oltissima FACU N H <1 heart-leaved water plantain Alisma subcordatum OBL N H <1 common burdock Arctium minus FACU I H 1 Jack-in-the-pulpit Arisoema tri h llum FACW N H <1 narrowleafbittercress Cardamineimpatiens FAC N H 2 sedge Carex s --- N H <1 Virginia wild rye flymusvir inicus FACW N H 2 willowherb E ilobiums --- N H <1 spotted touch-me-not impatiens capensis FACW N H 15 purple loosestrife L thrumsalicario OBL 1 SN PI H 2 yellow wood sorrel Oxalis stricta FACU N H <1 nodding smartweed Persicoria la athi olia FACW N H 1 reed canary grass Phalaris orundinacea FACW I H 15 dwarf clearweed Pileo cfpumila FACW N H 10 bittersweet nightshade Solanum dulcamara FAC I H 1 Canada goldenrod Solids o conadensis FACU N H 1 sow thistle Sonchussp I H 3 side-flowering aster Symphyotrichum later'lorum FACW N H <1 stinging nettle Urtica dioica FACW I H <3 white vervain Verbena urtic"olia FAC N H <1 areal cover invasives 32 %areal cover natives 66.5 *Native Status: N=native to the state of MN,I=Introduced,U=Undetermined(per MnDNR 2013). **Invasive Status: FN=Federal noxious weed,SN=State prohibited noxious weed,RN=State restricted noxious weed, PI=DNR Prohibited invasive species,PS=State prohibited weed seed,RS=State restricted weed seed(per Mn DNR 2013). Strata:V(woody vine),H(herb layer),S(saplings and shrubs),T(tree). Covervalues of<1 were treated as 0.5for calculations. red font=invasive species of concern. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 7 Table 3. Plant Species Observed at Nelson Restoration Site in Hennepin County,September 2,2015. 3d.Enhanced Upland Forest %areal cover Overall Common Name Scientific name Indicator Native Invasive Strata within Status* Status** Upland Forest Community box elder Acerne undo FAC N T 15 silverma le Acersocchorinum FACW N T 15 green ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica FACW N T 20 cottonwood Po ulus deltoides FAC N T 15 big-toothed aspen Po ulus grandidentato FACU N T 5 bur oak Quercus mocrocar o FAC N T 5 basswood Tills americana FACU N T 5 common buckthorn Rhamnus cothartica FAC I RN S 8 nannyberry Viburnum lenta o FAC N S <1 Virginia creeer Porthenocissus quinquefolia FACU N V <S wild grape Vitis riparia FACW N V <1 ferns --- --- N H <1 white snakeroot A eratino altissima FACU N H 1 garlic mustard Allioria petiolato FAC I SN H 1 ramp Allium tricoccum FACU N H <3 common burdock Arctium minus FACU I H 2 Jack-in-the-pulpit Arisoemo tri h llum FACW N H 2 nodding bur marigold Bidens cernuo OBL N H <1 narrowleaf bittercress Cardamine impatiens FAC N H 2 Pennsylvania bittercress Cordamine pensylvanica FACW N H <1 sedges Carex sp --- N H 1 hackberry Celtisoccidentalis FAC N H <S common enchanter's nightshade Circaea lutetiono ssp canodensis FACU N H 1 bottlebrush grass Etymush strir FACU N H <1 cleavers Galium a urine FACU N H <1 orange day-lily Geum cf oleppicum FACW N H <1 orange day-lily Hemerocallis ulva UPL I H 1 spotted touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis FACW N H 3 rice cut grass Leersiaoryzoides OBL N H 2 lady's thumb Perskaria moculosa FACW I H <1 carrion flower Smilaxs --- N H <1 bittersweet nightshade ISolanum dulcomara FAC I H 2 sow thistle ISonchU55P i H 1 side-flowering aster ISymphycitfichurnlaterilorum FACW N H <1 common poison ivy Toxicodendron rodicons FAC N H <1 %areal cover invasives 12 %areal cover natives 102.5 *Native Status: N=native to the state of MN,I=Introduced,U=Undetermined(per MnDNR 2013). **Invasive Status: FN=Federal noxious weed,SN=State prohibited noxious weed,RN=State restricted noxious weed,PI=DNR Prohibited invasive species, Strata:V(woody vine),H(herb layer),s(saplings and shrubs),T(tree). Cover values of<1 were treated as 0.5 for calculations. red font=invasive species ofconcern. MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 8 In order to assess total cover by invasive and native species in the wetland, weighted averages were calculated (Table 4). Table 4.Weighted averages of vegetation cover. Total Invasive Target Invasive Wetland Plant Wetland Vegetation in Vegetation in Native Vegetation in Community Acres Wetland(%cover) Wetiand(%cover)' Wetland(%cover) Wet Meadow 2.14 40 40 76 Vegetated Deep Marsh (open water excluded)b 0.09 10.5 10.5 6 Enhanced Lowland Forest 0.35 (wetland portion)` 32 17 66.5 Weighted Average 37.9 35.9 72.3 a Per performance standards,values represent percent cover by cattail,purple loosestrife,and reed canary grass. b Vegetated Deep Marsh calculated as 18%vegetation cover in the 0.82 acre Deep Marsh. `Represents Enhanced Lowland Forest within the delineated wetland boundary. Hydrology From January through August 2015, precipitation at the nearby Chanhassen weather station indicated 0.98 inches above average. During our September 2, 2015 monitoring, the vast majority of the Wet Meadow was observed to be saturated; scattered small pockets of shallow inundation were observed in areas due to the site's variable microtopography. The Deep Marsh and associated swales were observed to be inundated. No surface water was observed leaving the wetland's outlet culvert on the west edge. Figure 3 illustrates "S" for saturated areas, "I"for inundated areas, and "(1)"for small pockets of inundation. Performance Standards For 2015,the performance standard called for<-20% invasive species cover of invasive cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass in the wetland plant communities. AES's field monitoring on September 2, 2015, in conjunction with calculated weighted averages, estimated total invasive plant cover in the wetland to be 35.85%(Table 5); however, invasive plant control interventions have occurred on the site since our September 2, 2015 monitoring(see Discussion section below). MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 9 Table S. Review of Performance Standards,expected(E)and observed(0) Performance Standard Community Condition Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 (2015) (2016) (2017) E O E O E O All Invasive plant cover(invasive cattail,purple :520 35.9 :520 520 loosestrife, and reed canary grass)(%) All Total vegetation cover(not including open - 280 280 water)(%) Wet Cover by native grass/sedge species(%) - - >30 Meadow Wet Cover by native forb species (%) - - 220 Meadow Wet Installed species present(%) - - >-33 Meadow Deep Marsh Planted species widely dispersed (#) - - >-6 DISCUSSION Grading has been completed at the Nelson Restoration site, resulting in the successful creation of a 0.5-acre Deep Marsh and a 2.14-acre Wet Meadow. The project was executed as designed, with the exception of slightly modified geometry of the Deep Marsh and the two meandering swales (Figure 3). As designed, the Deep Marsh filled during Spring/Summer 2015 and remained completely inundated into the fall. Simultaneously, the Wet Meadow became saturated and remained so throughout the growing season (with scattered small areas of intermittent inundation). During wetter periods, surface water was observed to be slowly leaving the wetland via the outlet culvert on the west edge. However, during our formal monitoring on September 2, 2015, no surface water was observed leaving the wetland. Initial vegetation establishment and management have also been completed at the site; however, after only one growing season, the wetland is still in its early stages of native plant establishment. Following grading activities in Winter 2014-2015, a modified native seed mix was installed in the thin-spread portion of the Wet Meadow. The original project phasing called for no native seeding until Spring 2015 (after herbicide treatments), but AES felt a partial native seeding could expedite native vegetation establishment while reserving the remainder of native seed for installation at a later date. While native vegetation clearly dominates the wetland with 72.3%cover(Table 4), as expected significant invasive species pressure continues due to invasive species propagules of seeds and tubers in the wetland soil. Invasive plant cover in the Wet Meadow zone (consisting of purple loosestrife and narrow-leaved cattail) has been greatly reduced from 100% prior to construction to 27% in the Wet Meadow sample plot (Table 3a); considering the entire Wet MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 10 Meadow plant community, invasive plant cover has been reduced to 40%(Table 3a). The combined cover of these two invasive species in the Deep Marsh was approximately 10.5%I (Table 3b). The primary invasive plant in the Enhanced Lowland Forest was reed canary grass (15%,Table 3c). When it was seen that purple loosestrife was emerging from the seedbank in Summer 201 , AES manually collected purple loosestrife beetles(Galerucella pusma)from Twin Cities collection sites recommended by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. On August 20, 2015, approximately 350 beetles were released at the Nelson Restoration site. It is hoped that these beetles will overwinter successfully at the site, reproduce, and spread througho�lt the wetland. If the beetles become established at the site, it is expected that in the coming years they will help provide effective biocontrol of purple loosestrife. This biocontrol strategy has proven successful at other wetlands in the Twin Cities, including at nearby Ferndale Marsh, which was dominated by purple loosestrife in the 1990s. Following our September 2, 2015 monitoring visit, almost all purple loosestrife flowers were clipped and removed from the site to prevent them from producing or setting seed. The focus of 2016 management will be on the aggressive control of any remaining purple loosestrife, cattail, and reed canary grass. The site's enhanced upland buffers will also continue to be managed for upland invasive species, especially common buckthorn seedlings and narrowlef bittercress. FUTURE MANAGEMENT The majority of wetland restoration work was completed in 2014 and 2015. Continued attention and effort will be required to control invasive plant species in the wetland while the native species expand their coverage and establish dominance at the site,which will reduce the invasion rate of undesirable species in the future. Management activities scheduled for the Nelson Restoration site are shown in Table 6. Table 6. Future ecological management activities Timeframe Activity Winter 2015-16 Install remaining wetland native seed mix native and upland forest seed mix 2016-2017 Aggressive spot spraying and spot mowing of invasive vegetation in and around th wetland 2016-2025 Continued management of two rain gardens Summer 2016 Installation of wood duck nest boxes and bat house Spring-Fall 2016 Continued wildlife monitoring and reporting 2016-2017 Continued ecological monitoring and reporting MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 11 Figures Figure 1—Project Location Map Figure 2—Proposed Restoration Plan Figure 3—As-Built Plan and Fixed Photo Reference Points Attachments Attachment A—Representative Site Photographs MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 12 Figure 1. Project Location Map S. t } � �• t ;�� r C�i I _ . • y. PROJECT LOCATION Maps S"W,*CWS Qob►e-FSS USA ToM Not Figure Z. Proposed Restoration Plan - — 7�- - �-'•z�> ,, 0 80' 160' 1FLiEtt4 A. .a.wur t w. NV.CILv D92.a1- �iD.LLT BlNXAIAR'• I I 5 wLML.e.LVwr LVwT -—-— -—-a� - —T6NKAWA R0— -- N I.TISwu HCSAH 135— 1"-80'(plotted 11"x 17") C� _ A [xT.LC7LLNp A(2.9e Kvts) L— vn.00119RANT - _ - MOND BUFFER SETBACK(23 rMr / INV- N clef El.�i�fL�� • .LR.NTr1.A : Nr-ELLv 992.76 � � � .NTNT.NN � Nw A.>Ar I 711t$a.VIM AREA('_9C Y:R(S) y/� ./ ,T Exsn3 CAICN 3/52b Q Y Mr»XN.NN.L.MIMITN».M1 /'� EX6Utii 4AtNDlL Ism; EIMIN3 ICLrMIDNE PrIMAL e�..ln.em [x611LG WATER VALVE NON. ►' /%' � ,10 DEIAN IN PLACE) w.•L Rw—r•.»L.1 N ' O ID'WC 7 O•PUCd. K nv.EI£/.3:D.Sa71 INv.Dl`/ 97910 -MOMnD7 WOODCHIP TEAL EXWIP12 WMIOVR -------------- I' rw war .wT ExuRP4 NOEx Lc.IDLa ..n.r NTwT.. lA�f,Y�: � .LN.NTrI.. iD1� .> ____-_a1 JJ i U.9EVE'LT LNE RM, ------ CRY.%l..,6� � ..w..Dup /�: ., ^: ., _——————_ I ».T�TN.r vwr smm CULVERT i I 35' ».ruerss a .vw..r�rw t. y tX �3.NOER,3I Amo RAIER A IIS IR b11 to,PVG EXPe9.-e..NDM--*0UND CA$ w EN¢Ev.EST 81, R� / ].'CNP f EXERV3.NDERv43UND ELCCIRIC w� AM.ELEv.2117!7 ,$ , I /� e I µ ..' ,i / �� .yr •I �' � [x6T3.04)03'1711ND 1ELE>`IC\E ruw IrN.ELLS' 91-.311 Ay •/. Ex51IN3.TERIEV ELE'CRC EXIST.5I RVE/MDNUMEST • lrrN... .. 00N.vwN.Nwr -N-MED MID5"Or ELEVA7g5 00 -RC'-75ED SILT rIENCE eAr<.Cvt wT LVNT ` �' NV.:ELEV.39J iq Juu- e :4P, GENERALIZED CROSS SECTION B•B' E+e Ncm uwLu FOREST(l.DT ACRES) 0 C �• .D• . NOT TD SCALE 1.. ` w7N ENHANCED LDLtAND PORLRT(3M ACAM RAIN CAfmL\ C.05 ACRET O A.Ne [I*Be.esxRAro In DIIpK] .r...rweE lOvla•�,' �.e.. r.. Lee N.T.w..w ,r .,NT NN.we REI YNDO�R:2.I4 ACRES) \))ARR 1'PVC 61r .Lo.rn. —LVN1a DEP WASH(0.5D AGES)'T,En I I '0•HDPE I NV.ELEv 9115,37II -� I 'N E/1 I+ Iw.ELEY.9a JD .xeT.e.o e..et . .. 1'N---N'1--f DETRANI EDC[PUINIAC:0.D!ACRES) M+..'L) ILII I I !_>1 , x„M.L. Y ar It ; ..a.ecreLm e.Lve.r - I A. FLO.DNECTIO, ''I•;' I I GENERALIZED CROSS SECTION A-A' NOT TO SCALE V. LrmAU N.Ner. �.v.L NiN.A n. �• •r.Ar.mmw ' Nw.r.r,J N•w..M.e - SULLARYOrE%CA NATION .1nhN J r�cr .La .Piave J_ , X.Ner q✓Wl• WN1Jr •1 R..q µ1'q IwLder..e...IL•V.�C11 TLV• m,m..N,9a drn•ne. R 1 rr.N.R) T A, 1e.•Ni q+YLq :4Jfa. `J IMIIIN NAM..N...A.r Nf•A, ..n iNLTeA•0 t L•A M.e rTNIMNI C xM.RO.....MISR m..•.m • it Ivry a/-p[yy . r.A NE F 1.MOL ueafa -.+.r:,..r.. ....am.w. APPLIED EhAL DF91CN S_BNDVIL wlRr w �'''y_ ,1'^="_• .--' NELSON:11tST04ATgN DESpNICU ECOLOGICAL O0.NOROPp$� iE5T02+LTOV �lqA `-I•U Figure 3. As-Built Plan and Fixed Photo Reference Points J y 4 q:• i N �N ; c •\ 4 1 r C J \ ! 40 ' \ A. rT Elm St 1100001 Vm i M"dw Piot > _ I \ S Minnetonka Highland Ln ., . . - \ i. 1 l S !� 1 V Rd e yp. -, - }, Nelson Restoration Project As-Built Plan and Fixed Photo ateSWroes: LMIC VMS(2012 aaia0 Reference Points AES Jab Number.12-0875 Date12/142015 .e Neme: 'Wetland Delineation(2.98 ac) Proposed Land Cover. Nelson AaBu9tPian_PhotoRelPointe 201512-14.mcd L._..i Q Actual Deep Marsh Enhanced Upland Forest(2.07 ac) PMFO ECPUED • Enhanced 0.82 ac ECU ES L Fixed Photo Reference Point Enhad Lowland F ( ) SERV11CKES - Rain Garden(0.05 ac) 21838 Muahtown Road Woodchip Trail Prim tate,MN 55372 N Wet Meadow(2.14 ac) 952-447-1919 Contour(2ft interval) www.aPPNed....— S Saturated Soil(9/2115) Deep Marsh(0.50 ac) I\ 0 50 100 N I Inundated Soil(9/2/15) - Screening Plantings(0.08 ac) Feet Attachment A— Representative Site Photographs (All photos taken September 2, 2015; photos focus on wetland restoration; all fixed photo reference points not represented) Fixed Photo Reference Point 1: Wet Meadow and Deep Marsh (looking southwest) 4 F Fixed Photo Reference Point 4: South Swale leading to Deep Marsh (looking north) Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report Attachment A 1 ^a} l v { f 9 < k Deep Marsh: From north end of Deep Marsh (looking south) r., 1 A N 3 e. t tYearta� &r,� .K `� �, rL � 4 ��-y� "'� t �- rxf��] t �i"j'��IX .:� Xe, '' j]► ��'i+. J ~y Y Fixed Photo Reference Point 5: Wet Meadow,with vegetation sampling plot in distance(looking east) Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report Attachment A 2 w ate.. tp _ ^ +',jam' '(� '�' `�-,.�' � `►'� � �, ,�r g e . e w s°R 44%n yet�Zaa a � .tea wo .-a..; �,� . , a int. ,}7^�{�'�� _� -„ : :� ._�"'�"4� � •�+ 7 c+ .q r.w • 7 ti , r I S *` Nelson Restoration Design 2010 5oo Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN j HIG Project # 131065 HIG N Client Project # 12-0975 Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1"=500') 0 r 1.C. n w4 .. ,::, . - ;�• . 4f jr Ao ♦ kms, i ` ""�+► •_ tis Ar ,. �. � T Ia 4 i AAM Vol • r t � , r NelsonRestoration Design • • Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN HIG Project # 131o65 Client Project 12-0975 Approximate . • • • • • • ' Ills �. f! 01 4" �. .�• !AN4 4k qp ..l yy S �•' t4 w ` w Y V �T F" 4k y ' Nelson .1 yo. A • • 1997 • • Tonkawa Road HIG Project # 131o65 Long Lake, MN Client r • 12-0975 .,'! K -Mum" } • #`, r. 1 - ,� �• arw • r 01) yrt ,► ♦ � 1 r � • � � aY r • r �`1 1 `� ��, fS''"•-may' -•r r. Cr X: y.e _ ,fir^" � ;,�y e r,►. 'iiMi k t � NelsonRestoration Design 1991 \ • • Tonkawa R•. • HIG Project # 131o65 Long Lake, MN ProjectClient • • . ah V 10 t 14 �A Nelson Restoration Design 9 a Y ya t a w • • Tonkawa Road HIG Project # 131o65 ProjectLong Lake, MN Client • • � - �- -•y,A� .I e�� � � � � mow•.` NM �� ♦•. OF Nk 04 1 k .r � � �` • i�..err r;,�� +,.� ., �. ����•.� ah J moi; r� .,. r i��, ,te,; � �'• � _ 177, „ rt I • � � 1*i• eft Nelson Restoration Design 1979 50o Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN / HIG Project # i3io65 N Client Project # 12-09175 H I G Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1”=500') �+ a - r t J n a A% TI y gQ a M y - sem. ♦ SLI+ 4 11, IM it rn r 1 - y i n i } 4T .• �... Fes'T r r hi.,;tnrienlinfn.com HIG ' • • • Client• ' • 12-0975 474%r ♦AYe4 y. r ' >>A \. 4 s � 04 .4 n4 4 4k ,.a IA 1969-2 HIG Project # 131o65 Client Project 12-0975 Approximate . • • • • • • ' � I ..V� � +� � • ��s �yen �..,,<.....•.. wy flo Or 'too t .( 1441 44 a I r five Nelson • . • 1964 • • Tonkawa R•. • HIG Project # 131o65 ProjectLong Lake, MN Client # 12-0975 r•t M A rt .. Design• • Tonkawa ' •. • HIG Project # 131o65 ProjectLong Lake, MN Client • • Approximate • • • • (1"=500') ' , �r Y► ' a%eve Y� 00, 449*6 M' • r # r �3 Nelson Restoration Design 1953 5oo Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN / HIG Project # 131065 H IG N Client Project # 12-0975 Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1"=500') k Fy � ti Ilk ^t hill O7'1(uhll C '()] Nelson • • 1940 1 • •. • HIG Project # 131o65 Long Lake, MN Client Project # 12-0975 6 R 4 i y 7r r Nelson Restoration Design 1937 5oo Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN � HIG Project # 131065 N Client Project # 12-0975 Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1"=500') a NELSON RESTORATION PROJECT LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 2014 GENERAL NOTES LOCATION MAP SHEET �N�EX EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY DATA EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IS BASED FROM AVAILABLE GIS AND SURVEY DATA. ADDITIONAL 1,11 ) z - 1.0..............................................................INDEX AND COVER SHEET REVIEW OF RECENT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WAS UTILIZED TO SUPPLEMENT AND REVISE DATA. > CONTRACTOR SHOULD VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. +a� _ 2.0.......................................................EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ., 1 'Q, S' 3.0...................................................PROPOSED RESTORATION PLAN NOTES: __ 3.1.........................PROPOSED RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS 1. THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS PRIOR _ - • "* TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. ;'• - - = H� ->..i •` t_ 3.2.........................PROPOSED RESTORATION NOTES AND DETAILS �" d ,,' f•ID Watertown Rd; 2. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE DOUG MENSING(AES)AND CAN BE REACHED AT: CELL:(612)202-2252,OR OFFICE:(952)447-1919 EXT.2#. �� +• o� �( 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITY COMPANIES �' 'a • ? PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND THEIR PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(800) 252-1166 OR(651)454-0002,OR http://mnticketentry.korterroweb.com AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION. NO FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WAS CONDUCTED FOR THIS PLAN SET. ,• ,,.•..`K _.\ 'z •t 11. y l C .< " f' .'b ox St 1 _ 4. IF UTILITIES ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT CONFLICT WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION,THE +, d CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. 4 v 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT ENTER ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. t '. >4, \k 1 6. POINT COORDINATES&VERTICAL DATUM ..s1 1t^i °°�1 r t ' - PROJECT LOCATION • HORIZONTAL COORDINATES STATED IN THIS PLAN ARE IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY NAD83 aI + '.t (1986)COORDINATE SYSTEM(US SURVEY FEET). SS l • VERTICAL:ALL ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN IN NGVD29 DATUM. GPS SURVEY BENCHMARKS Map Source:ArcGIS Online-ESR1 USA Topo Maps • HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SURVEY CONTROL IN THE DATA STATED ABOVE WAS DERIVED BY GPS CALIBRATION TO MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION SLAUG MNDT(GSID STATION#11751) WITH CHECKS TO MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION KEGN MNDT(GSID STATION#11460). taorarM • TO SEE THE PUBLISHED DATA ON THESE MNDOT SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENTS(GEODETIC DATA SHEETS),SEE THE MN/DOT WEB SITE: ° 160° http://www.dotstate.mn.us/surveying/geodetics/geoindex.htmi DRAWN BY: ENK JOB DATE 6/13/2014 N0. DATE BY RENSgN DESCfiIPfION I HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME SHEET NO. OR UNDER MYDIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ■ APPROVED: OMµ OM JOB MAWR: 12-0975 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. APPLIED ® NELSON RESTORATION DESIGN FINAL, DESIGN SUBMITTAL m DAA 8/13/14 ^� E ECOLOGICAL LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 1 .0 C�FltF: 120975cst2D140813-Cowf.d SIGNATURE. ante ie a SERVICES, INC. HRGreen INDEX AND COVER SHEET DATE: S/15201d REG.NO. 50925 ��� ii - — — TONKAWA RD --- —� — s.— =e —HCSAH 135 f '°, 0'-, •J�, 0.y � o © / t i / 41, P/ X24'CMP A V i — �i Ji $ NV. ELEV. 962.76 \`\ I I /� go \ \ t i 10-PVC .0e// o INV. ELEV. 976.90 ���i •a s { r i t t •� 0 / r EXIST. COMPOST �/ ) �► �� PILE +� o d / \ f 40 INV. ELEV. 966.52 /• i / X 1 \\ I } 10* Pvc ,yy2, { I•——.—O INV. ELEV. 9678) 24CP F' EXIST. WETLAND A (2.98 ACRES) INV. ELEV. 962 9, lea: U7 • p I / f f t� ` t \\ \ r r INV. EIEV. 962.47 - •`I ` // I Ile24'CPP J eB s .7o 98°'� I t I PROJECT BOUNDARY (5.65 ACRES) INV. ELEV. 974.31 937.34 I\ I y / 2X/ , STEEP SLOPE (>12X) CPP I / _ INV. ELEV. 983.90 / .. ! ( 1e' CMP• ' EXISTING CATCH BASINS / W. El". 967.69 � EXISTING MANHOLE (SAN) EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 0 ^L ' /'J �J•" ' –`'' �_ EXISTING UTILITY POLE '0' �4'PVC PP \ APPROXIMATE UXAMM _ _—Y �\ EXISTING WATER VALVE / I f INV. ElPV096HD. E .\ 4'rvC 98 r/ _ \\� \\\\ t \ \ EXISTING WOODCHIP TRAIL INV. ELEV. 5.37 } // _—`� �\ \, \ Tl\ �t EXISTING CONTOUR ------------ �r -------905------ \\ \ ._ EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT – — —— — — —– UNE EXISTING STORM CULVERT EXISTING UNDERGROUND WATER w / 73.00'R.O.W. j ' �J 7 i ( �/� \..•. / EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS G EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EUG EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TUG EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EON EXIST. GROUND SPOT ELEVATION xM.20 EXIST. SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND NOTES: 1) EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR LINES FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY UDAR DATA. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOT BY HR GREEN. 04/16/2014. 2) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY AES, 05/23/2013 (RNAL REPORT DATED 12/23/2013). 3) WETLAND A CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA: x16.5 ACRES. av � 9,, I 0 120' 240' LAKE MINNETONKA STUBBS BAY 1" = 120' (plotted 11"x17") I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME DRAWN 9Y: EMK JOB DATE: 5/13/2014 NO. DATE BY REVISION DESMI TION _ SHEET NO. OR UNDER MV pRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL Illllll�n,l 11 APPLIED ® FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL APPROVED- DMM, DM JOB NUMEM: 12-0975 ENGINEERUNDERTHE LAM OFTHE STATE OFMINNESOTA. NELSON RESTORATION E J ECOLOGICAL oRONo, MINNESOTA EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 2 CAD DATE- 8/13/,4 SIGNATURE: Cep F� 12097Scst201408,3—Topo.dw9 DA E: Daniel Mielke REG.NO. bu����SERVICES, INC. HRGreen 1 INV. ELEV 0I 0' / 11 .96233 LEGEND GRADE CHANNEL F-ATEND -�i TO MATCH CULVERT INVERT II -`J / ~ 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY I I ' -- - PROTECT EXIST. 1 1 / / / - -" - RD POWER POLE TONKAWA --�- �' HCSAH 135 r 1" = 80' (plotted 11"x17") _ •`v;� -co may, �` �\ yes � `` \ ® A EXIST. WETLAND A (2.98 ACRES) „ - PROTECT EXIST. ' ' 1 9ss IEG- r \ MCWO BUFFER SETBACK (20 FEET) /SURVEYMONUMENT / A 24^ CMP 1� INLET PROTECTION INV. ELEV. 962.76 1 t / THIN SPREAD AREA (1.60 ACRES) PROTECT EXIST. 'Y // q66' - (SEE DET SURVEY MONUMENT i i /� EXISTING CATCH BASINS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY B' / I 1 / /'• MATERIAL STOCKPILE AREA �� EXISTING MANHOLE (SAN) �� / '?�i� r / '/ ► .01 o;r ji4� EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL t /) c SILT FENCE /3r / 1/l11 (SEE DETAIL) r �,i!// TEMPORARY !I/T ! ti � A, ) / �., + a, _ ".. '. / EXISTING UTILITY POLE -�- CONSTRUCTION / I /Y �* k d�k� ,1� �/ / ' -% 'i wv ACCESS POINT ! 1 �. 'S.�. A Y .� , EXISTING WATER VALVE �... +� r '��EXIST COMPOST PILE TO BE REMOVED r v AND SLOPE STABILIZED VdTH EROSION V -i x j/ a / ► EXISTING WOODCHIP TRAIL 1 / y Y kP X,a '� CONTROL BLANKET,CLASS IV,220 S.Y. i • �• / y'\��'S�ky o / F A (TO REMAIN IN PLACE) p (' .1V�h k C�- c 10" PVC INV, ELEV. 966.52 10"f PVC ' i / PROPOSED WOODCHIP TRAIL _4 / / / � INV. ELEV. 976.90 H // /� //�',� EXISTING CONTOUR PROTECT EXIST. / u POWER POLE T -/�' j / --� EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR -------06'------- �t / PROTECT EXIST.CULVERT I AND OUTLET PROTECTION Z / / /� EASEMENT UNE - - - - - - - - 24" CM INLET PROTECTION + 0�1 y, INV. ELEV. 962.46 O ' (SEE DETAIL) -**A 1 :� y' I / S /• A'` ,' PROTECT EXIST.CULVERT ;/ ,' STORM CULVERT 1 l n335 / /"AND PLACE 6-INCHES OF FILL /1 i OVER EXPOSED PVC PIPE EXISTING UNDERGROUND WATER N / L Y� y O ' I ) / i 10^ PVC ' /! i ) G ! R I J , I / INV. ELEV. 967.83 EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS 970 1 '"sy 1 I \ /\ 4 S ' EUG \ EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 24^ CMP g O / / / 1 l \ r ruG INV. ELEV. 962.42 EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE/ / ( /• / / / �9,p� C+ / / y i f ( \ � / 24" CPP' �'in ! ,) /�,///l _\ EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EOH INV. ELEV. 974.31 ' EXIST. SURVEY MONUMENT • Sol# ' � PROTECT EXIST. �I .� / =/ PROPOSED GROUND SPOT ELEVATION _ _-,/ � , _ � '� SURVEY MONUMENT %��4 GRADE CHANNEL E AT END I \ ,,., -' �' ' i - / PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO MATCH CULVERT INVERT �00 24" CPP PROPOSED LAND COVER: -, --- PROTECT EXIST i' INV. ELEV 983.90 ; SURVEY MONUMENT -_ =_= -'18^ CMp GENERALIZED CROSS SECTION B - B' ENHANCED UPLAND FOREST (2.07 ACRES) 0 __INV. ELEV. 987.69 NOT TO SCALE ENHANCED LOWLAND FOREST (0.82 ACRES) 0 MAX.ELEV OF THIN SPREAD PROTECT EXIST.CULVERT- HYDRIC SOIL:964.5 FT. AI[TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS . �\ItII `b RAIN GARDEN (0.05 ACRES) 0 v � ;� \U\\I\\�1`•''„ 1 I INSTALL CLASS II RIPRAP 7 I I '- 4^PYO /' ��^ �QEMS T?GRADEFOR OUTLET PROTECTION ( ' •�� ��� y / WET MEADOW WET MEADOW WET MEADOW 2.14 ACRES0.1 C.Y. i /- WL-962.7 ( ) -•\j111111 M I I ^,• 1 / ) / �' THIN-SPREAD HYDRIC SOIL / - INV-961.6 DEEP MARSH (0.50 ACRES) 0 SIN I ! / 4' PVC 1 (_1 FT.THICK),TYP. 11 III I<, I 10" HDPE Y / INV. ELEV. 985.37 - - I /Ililll(R Q 1 // EXIST.GROUND ELEV.=963.3 !�SL PE, WETLAND EDGE PLANTING (0.08 ACRES) O ill I INV. ELEV. 984.38 � y� 2' 2.5:1TYPIICAL FLOW DIRECTION III / PROTECT EXIST.CULVERT llJlt�rllit ' I i / GENERALIZED CROSS SECTION A -A' \ -,,ti !� NOT TO SCALE T DEEP MARSH• ,SWALE , MAX.ELEV OF THIN SPREAD 5 4'DEEP CUT BELOW PNT x r PNT x Y PINT x r WETLAND BOUNDARY HYDRIC SOIL:964.5 FT. EXIST.GRADE A 437492.06 164703.73 I 437676.50 164526.34 Q 437729.24 164567.18 TONKAWA RD. (ELEV-966 FT.) (DEEP MARSH) SUMMARY OF EXCAVATION B 437529.81 164698.49 1 437692.94 164522.82 R 437720.41 164618.41 ---- WET MEADOW 1. TOTAL EXCAVATION 2,588 CY C 437559.14 164725.90 K 437719.10 164456.01 5 437699.44 164643.49 ---------962,7 2. HAUL OFF-SITE 807 CY D 437582.18 1EXIST.GROUND ELEV.g 963.3 64683.33 L 437707.93 164381.50 T 437667.24 164659.84 INV-959.3 3. THIN RE-SPREAD MATERIAL 2,048 CY E 437621.41 164639.84 M 437729.50 164411.42 u 437640.11 164704.00 THIN-SPREAD HYDRIC SOIL 7 F 437623,30 164601.43 N 437725.72 164441.44 V 437605.15 164750.73 (5 1 FT.THICK) W/ASSUMED 15%EXPANSION -2.5:1 SLOPE, VARIES G 437630.66 164568.97 O 437740.80 164451.96 W 437580.50 164756.88 WETLAND BOUNDARY H 437653.15 1 164539.54 1 P 1 437752.84 1 164470.76 1 TYPICAL 17.6-81 (ELEV=966 F1.) NOTE:POINTS A-C 8 L-N ARE CENTERLINE OF CHANNEL COORDINATES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME DRAWN BY: EMK JOB DATE. 8/13/2014 N0. DATE BY REVISION DESCRIPTION SHEET N0. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIIXI AND THAT IAMADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ��� - >1 APPLIED ® FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL APPROVED: DMN, OM JOB NUMBER: 12-0975 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOFTHESTATE OFMINNESOTA. NELSONRESTORATION DESIGN E ECOLOGICAL 3.0 CAD DATE: s/1s/1+ 51GNATURE. bull ASERVICES, INC. HRGreen ORONO, MINNESOTA PROPOSED RESTORATION PLAN DA CAD FILE: 120975c*t2O14O8I3-R*wLdw9 TE:W15rz014 Daniel Mielke REG.NO. bu 1. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED,OR PLANTED,AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. 18. ALL EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS, UTILITIES, INFRASTRUCTURE, LANDSCAPING SPECIFICATIONS. SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AN AFFIDAVIT CERTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AND SEED FOR REPLACING OR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST AND SHALL 2. WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN CONSISTS OF FURNISHING AND TRANSPORTING ALL AND PLANT SUPPLIERS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING SEEDING MEET THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO:APPLY HERBICIDE/BURN WETLAND,INSTALL AND PLANTING WORK. EROSION CONTROL,EXCAVATE WETLAND AREAS,HAUL APPROXIMATE FIRST 12-INCHES 19. FINAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WOODCHIP TRAIL SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE - OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL, PLACE THIN SPREAD OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL, APPLY 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CEASE EXCAVATION AND CONSULT WITH OWNER'S FIELD BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. HERBICIDE/BURN,PREPARE SOIL&-AND PLANT-NATIVE VEGETATION. DURING THE REPRESENTATIVE IF CONFINING LAYER ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION PHASE BOTH THE WESTERN OUTLET AND THE SOUTHERN CONNECTOR -MARSH. 20. WHILE NOT ANTICIPATED, DEWATERING WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CHANNELS SHALL BE EXCAVATED LAST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, - - ------------- - - - - ---------- EXCAVATION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST AND WILL ADHERE TO REGULATORY STANDARDS TRANSPORT, AND INSTALL ALL SEED, AND PLANT PLUGS AND PERFORM ALL SOIL 16. TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE AND COMPACTION WITHIN THE WETLAND -THE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. IF DEWATERING IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR PREPARATION AND SUCH AUXILIARY WORK AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOAD HAUL TRUCKS ALONG THE TONKAWA RD.SHOULDER AREA. SHALL NOTIFY-THE OWNERS-REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO OPERATION. CONTRACTOR WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SOIL LIFTS SHALL NOT EXCEED A DEPTH OF 12-INCHES. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS.- SHALL ERMITS.SHALL FURNISH ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, LABOR, AND INCIDENTALS,UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR PLANS. 17. FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PLACE FROZEN BACKFILL MATERIALS WITHIN THE WETLAND AREA. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE FIRST 12-INCHES 3. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL BELOW EXISTING GRADE WILL BE DIRECTLY HAULED FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SHALL PREVAIL: OFF-SITE AND BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. A. ALL PERTINENT CODES, STANDARDS, ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO, AND MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WHERE APPLICABLE. BURY UPSLOPE OVERLAP BLANKETS SIDE BY B. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MnDOT SPECIFICATIONS) END OF BLANKET LOW SIDE USING AV OVERLAP UPSLOPE BLANKET LAID 2014 EDITION BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; IN TRENCH e" 1 WITH C. MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, 2014 EDITION WIDE BY e"DEEP F yW• OVER DOWNSLOPE BLANKET ENDS SECURELY CLOSED AND THE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS FIELD MANUAL, 2014 1 EDITION BY MnDOT; PREVENT LOSS OF OPEN GR ADED FL. a D. OSHA AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE SAFETY STANDARDS. AGGREGATE FILL.SECURED WITH a 50 PSI ZIP TIE. a 3. UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE WITHIN THIS PLAN SET, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ILII ��� Ind FOLLOW THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL MATERIALS. IN THE EVENT EXISTING CMP CULVERT I�I��� a OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ANDf;�e a THESE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER AND THE f� 11 ��y v OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY BEFORE CONTINUING WORK SO THAT THE W. 1 INCONSISTENCIES MAY BE RESOLVED. THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE �� �y>�y OVERLAP END OF SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. / ��)� UPSLOPE BLANKET 4" OVER DOWNSLOPE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS BLANKET AND SECURE PLACE ROCK LOGS LENGTHWISE s 6 WITH STAPLES FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IN THE CULVERT PIPE INVERT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL AND ADEQUATE TRAFFIC BURY TOE OF BLANKET IN CONTROL SIGNAGE AND WARNING DEVICES TO INFORM AND PROTECT THE PUBLIC AND TRENCH 6"WIDE BY 6"DEEP PUBLIC WATERS. © GEOTEXTILE SOCK BETWEEN 4-10 FEET LONG AND 4-6 INCH DIAMETER,SEAM TO BE 3 TAMP SOIL JOINTED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR PROVIDE A 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING HIS OR HER OWN ESTIMATE OF HEAT BONDED SEAM(OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED FIRMLY MATERIAL QUANTITIES. AGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND DURABLE PARTICLES OF COARSE AGGREGATE 12' 4"MIN 4"MIN CONFORMING TO SPEC.3137 TABLE 3137-1:CA-3 GRADATION. —+��r 6. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED PLANS ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN AS 6" DEFINING OR LIMITING THE AMOUNT OF WORK TO BE DONE UNDER THE CONTRACT, STAPLE HOWEVER EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN WILL BE CONSIDERED PLAN QUANTITIES INLET PROTECTION DETAIL STAPLES USED FOR FOR BIDDING AND PAYMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE NOT TO SCALE STAPLES FOR CHECKING PLANT AND MATERIAL QUANTITIES TO ENSURE QUANTITIES ON THE ANCHOR SLOT SINGLE JOINT PARALLEL OVERLAPS DRAWINGS AND PLANT OR MATERIAL LISTS ARE THE SAME. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 DISCREPANCIES,THE QUANTITIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL PREVAIL. 5 FT.MIN.LENGTH POST 1.5"MIN —� 7. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER'S ATBFT.MAXSPACING GEOTEXTILEFABRK:,36"1MDE �{�--1/-I}.F REPRESENTATIVE. 1"MIN PLASTIC ZP TIES (50 LBS.TENSILE) FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL ALONG TONKAWA RD. DURING 3, b, _T EXCAVATION AND HAULING.THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,APPROPRIATE LOCATED IN TOP S" BACKFILL WITH TAMPED io Io BARRICADES,SIGNAGE,AND FLAGGERS. ACCESS TO EMERGENCY VEHICLES SHALL BE NATURAL SOIL MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 5'MIN. STAPLE DETAIL PUSH PIN DETAIL ow 9. ANY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE OUTLINED IN THE PLANS NOTES: AND WHICH ARE DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S o ZT 1. STAPLES SHALL BE PLACED I4 A DIAMOND PATTERN AT 2 PER S.Y.FOR STITCHED BLANKETS. REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. a L NON-STICHED SHALL USE 4 STAPLES PER S.Y.OF MATERIAL. THIS EQUATES TO 200 STAPLES WITH W 6" WITH MIN. STITCHED BLANKET AND 400 STAPLES NONSTICHED BLANKET PER 100 S.Y.OF MATERIAL. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER INSTALLATION AND °D MAINTENANCE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. Psi w 2. STAPLE OR PUSH PIN LENGTHS SHALL BE SELECTED BASED ON SOIL TYPE AND CONDITIONS.(MINIMUM THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT, MAINTAIN, AND DOCUMENT EROSION CONTROL STAPLE LENGTH IS 6") MEASURES. 3. EROSION CONTROL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL OVER A PREPARED 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP TONKAWA RD. CLEAN AT ALL TIMES, SWEEPING EXCESS DESIGN GUIDELINES: SEEDBED. TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. MATERIALS WHEN NECESSARY. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA 1 ACRE. 4. ALL ANCHOR SLOTS SHALL BE STAPLED AT APPROXIMATELY 12"INTERVALS. 12. THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PLACE EFFECTIVELY UNTIL ALL THE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL ITEMS ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL. SILT FENCE DETAIL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE DRAWN BY: EMK JOB DATE: 9/13/2014 NO.I DATE I BY REWISKM DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY TNATTHIS PUN,SPEOFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME SHEET NO OR UNDERNYDIRECT SUPERVISWN AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALAPPLIED �+ p� FINAL DESIGN SUBMRTAL APPROVED• DMM. DM ,108 NUMBER: 12-0976 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NELSON RESTORATION DESIGN CAD DATE: 8/15/14 ECOLOGICAL PROPOSED RESTORATION NOTES 3, SIGNATURE: SERVICES.INC. HRGreen ORONO. MINNESOTA CAD FRE: 120975cvWI40a13-R4W. oAT.L Daniel Mielke REG.NO. AND DETAILS SEED SCHEDULE 04ETMEADOW SEED&6VETLANDEDGE PLANTING SEED luseboth seedmutesfor both areos buthoJve PLANT SCHEDULE ENHANCED UPLAND FORESTOVERSEED 34-161 em,tr ent'Wenand ENHANCED UPLAND FOREST PLANTS SCIENTfX%AME OOMMQILNAM[ Rate Common Name Scientific Nam+ Italf Rate %ofox Seeds! SCENTiFicriAME COMMON MAIN QTY RAI GINOIOS Ie/ae (ttpxta) [Baas) (%by-4 care TREES lirm[ms gabriarns 14301 woods-:v=Te 030 Anwicall sicitagh 9fass, Set:krylantlu Svitigicenre 0.7a 07D 14.07% 12'92 Fr u.tsn'ra R;vvbm+ Ceras eAw Ls -3sew sea a C.IC tall mamnat lass -09-4-4-5_ 0.23 0 2E• 4.;u9°o f A0 0 nus sarstina %ck clre E wys h trx 8k-ziebr aw aass 020 rice M Cyass Leewa w'Jades D.34 030 593% 370 Quercus nubV Red oak Et . s virgiRicus Vrg^4 Wid 3A10 .-.-- -___.___ _.._ _ -_ Total Grasses 1,40 1.26 24.!1% 23.02 rq;vsrra^tuna 5s:woad Total-Gralatii 4W river bulrush 13o8wschxnus ffuLa dis 0.65 076 1 15.20% 120 Tc"[Tres 25 0.20 0 t6 3.63% 200 SCIENMIC NAME COiAlIlWNi11AME Ras lake% - - Carex(aaustus 007 006 119% -024- --scamp cum" CDMMON NAIVE Qlry R3alS 46/41c) tussock sedm C,xex.strrcta 0.D4 0.04 011°+0 0.15 SHRU85 AUiumtrioctmir tals3rsek 1,25 le;rst spikerush Frwocharrsacicufais 011 010 194% 250 t+ralo+rclrtlioevit AggiNemyareebt 20 Aauile is caradenso Canada wLmrsi+re 025 marsh spikerush E-Witi'm ppalikqgs 0.11 010 2.03% 1,1$0 Rrurxrs ame.riclala WADI pftrm 50 Armoric tr hyWrn- 1st in-tRe ni 't C 25 To s nrsh JIwwYAS rafr ' 0 04 (104 0 AS% ?5 m Pryrws 01TIRiMITO Chc)ftd erry 30 Eivybia naaen0p+ryAa La t eared amr C.05 three-sware bulrush pwyrls 0.26 023 4.54% 100 Tota+Shrubs 80 Llydrogriltygum sir @°Oman^ 4'-:':"A WatarinIt 0.10s »ft stem bulrusn taGemaem10r12av 0.49 044 8.78"0 &W Ph!oxd,vxato r_e_1+ax ..1C wo ass Seir a s__ 0.D8 005 1.02% 3200 ENHANCED LOWLAN D FO RE ST PLANTS ---_-- -- ----. Sritadna.memoso C.,mmonfake-W,Ip +a#r'ssee 125 Total and Rushes 2.Z4 3.00 31. 71.65 SCENIINCNAME COMMONNAME qTY sawagiciflerimmoks ft a odtrnr.d 4.C5 sweet 1129 Aconrsanwxanus 031 028 553% D87 TREES Swrphyoridmrr cmrdlft u.'n liw!t-+eved ante- 4.05 comm water planlain AA1sma tnviVe 0.45 04D B.OD% 9.70 'lorabn' ra Rivv bi•ctI Thaldrumdioicum Et. •meadow+tim .r;5 marshmikweed Asnk-pmsmicamatt 031 029 567% 0M Lohirloricino -amarsoc U.ribna rid flora Ie7wett :_: broad-leaved arrowilea0 Sjovaria tattra.a 0.34 030 6.Or% Sao Sukx n:ra 5mck wii+avit 1 Total Forts 1 5) dant but rent! miu exa .s um p&5 D a9 9 8i14e 009 Toa+Tres 15 Total foft 1 11-To 34,07% 17.74SCENTIRCNAME COMMON NA AR QTY TRAIL VERGE OVERSEED Toah:: 6.10 5-00 100.0096 112.» Purpose: F. w mergent wirtland restoration for use in Ctl-and milrgalien,shoreline SIMIIS ENTI SCIK NAME COMMON NAME Rate restormemn,ml slarm"I r ponds where erneigent vegelabon is desired copmajorifftus accidentals 5unarbi sh PORIS Rata+ibsl cmisussericce Redcst.aa wood 1'2 , Planting _ $,ewdeAsaMTias ayrca Crnronmi c.std ----._ sumixcusn'rosip.mnadanrs Cam,ne!de-bery 1° 16a1Farbs 0.05 Sirmbucusracemas war.rocemmor Redeick berry 34,271 wat Meadow South d 11101119b:trurnum.ent a Narunytxrry ENHANCED LOWLAND FOREST OVERSEED(tOe all rates shown) tan.raoraN>,tl. „a Ranno, tete %awt seeds° Total snrerbs 7a 34.261 R n Sotnh A West W !orae) by W13 s0 R Iran Rat# K of Mix Seeds! 0" t`o'ne 9wnaa efaac 1 23 110 oil% 445 WET MEADOW-NO LIVE PLANTS Cownon Name Scientific Nemo (ky'ha) Ib'aci ivi by wit) sp h ra^odr'ns4 Due 005 041% 5O y'a wild ♦i- ' 1 1: 100 8.3T% 155 Air ra slou3t,grass 19COAMOnfut CYV2fCAn9 152 i. 4, ^&4,K rive cu wass LQ-'P'# 038 0- 2.CT% 3.10 DEEP MARSH PLANTS rv*rWrh rveVimnic ncia S 1.1.8% !1 t 17 t t z SCIENTIRCNAME COMMONNAME QTV V u wile M .ir ins 140 t T5 5 910% .170 tow rear"crams 04vent driana 0.11 0101 0. 3.30 GRAMIIODS tam manna rice 0Jy~a 9,aadie 020 0,215 010% 6 M faarl % 16. Ca.'ex!aCarirns Aire to LOO tow mn ass na s>Sata .10 0.04 0-19% 3.00 Total .00% eorwrstriera Tussock a 100 a 2 y Caraxaarrtau 24 1 1.78% 2. roe cwt ass Leerworyxrjes O.tI 0.16 O..t% 1;0 £aocha!:s a!ustrs A cisof ;+ne--udi 100 porimed Hoorn c4m. 0.00 D05 0.43% 1.100 foutbi .ass pcs tush: .44 014 2: % 40.00 5a!bascharnusfluYiatilis R:verburus+ 107 prairie cad ass spo'iinopraimefs 0.34 0.50 O.sd% 074 � t CareA. 010 017 1.40% 2-tq lussock CireA'.!osm 003 003 021% 0.50 Scha.na�o4Ctus rabernormontanr Sort dam btdrulr 100 Total Grasses 5.68 5.77 16.64% 80.37 br Wd A 010. 014 1.13% 500 ToW Gretninaws SOO tussock soda! Gares.-.."Wa 0.D4 0.04 0.13% DEC. PAK ruN Jaffee Nra.a= 004 OOs 034% 1500 med - Gro: na 7 011% 1.20 dye tJnAsh - aebvsWly 020 018 148% 3000 SGENTIRCHAM: C06MMONNAME TY For sed C#,#-yuis0ides 22 0.20 D.rb% 7.50 rays 000 008 0" 0000 FORM t+"h JtwArY'"ria 003 0.03 0174% to DO TOW • and Rushes 1.01 0.80 7.Y% lollm Acarus ca+am us Swet# m dors bulrush st tcatr~-- 013 012 038% 2000 w tri{ -1 0:4 % A Aksmorrhav Commonwater nein 100 woo"s Se ur mu: 006 O.M 0.15% 30.00 001 .1 1.3D trisms;cdor 5+ue 107 total So sand Rusnos 0.56 0.50 1.61% t0.30 f avec 0- 1 t % t. oarxadariacadota Pickeretweed 100 Marsh nwi c m t 0.13 0.12 % 11 soccad Jim wee 1 0.02 0.11% 0.75 eo,",000 bo"w Ev#Arian eAbWMrr, 0.03 0.03 0.11% 200 a.iaxm moo n mali:tarrsta 0. O 013% 1.30 seahtaria!-Ola 5rosd-kesved urawhead 100 1,0010#4 Jo# ♦,were Eueoom:ommaturah,m 0.07 0.00 4.18% 200 sawx#,$U"OW MMarldaue ao2frVIC D04 004 0.38% 0.q Spa sniu•maurycarpum Giar+tburreed !0 Vi I3 H' Opal 1 0.13% 1SID Taaiferbs 500 x wmn sneosowood MwWawm awnennars 0.06 0,C4 0.17% 2:4 bye Ina eawar Akwta a mV&u 001 001 0:2T% 080 .amu sw+mowi r Kelranmuc R.Siamfouz 0.0E 0.07 0.221% 0 25 wilirta geuwaarn ftn[ 007 008 013% 510 rr rr .17% 0. Sd D0: 002 014% 180 q'Itat is "'s-' i"s a Q.,13 D 4% 5.00 tasw"ork0led o61#r M++uoanwn 003 003 022% 150 WETLAND EDGE PLANTS but mons. flower lsmpw reg#f4 Out Cal 0 02% 5 C7 red-mm-ed 19 017 1.42% SAO SCIENTIFIC NAM E COMMON NAME QTY vwgina moursacr mire P cnarMnpnfun vir mran 000 1 O M 016% 400 1al Meadow-Le 7hebFmiwn da.. 001 001 0.12% 0.11 I TREES tam conefbwar Rudbeck'a taanrata 0.06 0.05 0.15% 0.245 t-AN sri yedefto hp;uv ads. 0.T. 1.11% 4,87 salJsr n' ro &bckwilaw - re lyenroa Saada amass 0.01 0.01 0.07% 2-00 ourmlimd worlweecl vlemoraff fAzxm4mfm 0. % 0. 30 bvq v yr h" tato h '.ato 0.17 c.lS 0.46% s DO CtAves rgot verwomolmyronwri 0.01 0.01 0.11% 4c Total T--'V s 19 bumhta,v-wqyd Yemenis fo"e,mw 0.07 0.S10 0.1% 090 20dw alexanows z a auaa 0.1.8 026 2.56% 1-00 SCENTIRC NAM E COMMON NAM E QTY Total Foatrx 04-0 075 736% 2946, Total Fabs 1.73 CIO 9.16% 3100 Oab a winter w^eat I see note at b a"•s a wrr ,arwhert late Wane n hoiandus occidentalis luttorroush be4•arnng of tr.for ecp,�*W4� I 7.63 700 59.r.%1 3.12 Ca+a sericao Rejesierdc cad r(.�pmm#rd#9 dal#Sl :$02 2!Cq 74 37% 11 14 Total CovorCro M.07 25.00 78.37% it.ti Total Curer 7.15 7. 58.37% 3.12 Viburnum/enta a Nsnn a 15 Totals; 13.45 t 1 .00K ISSAS Total Shrubs 50 Tatars: 35.31 31." 100.00% ocr 190.66 P-P %at meadow:Sodp meadow roomt•I,cuon for waaand rmgasan a Purport: Nacre npaman Oma mooca+an p lael tv for wo iAncini"m4n,ae-"0431 ecologcat res,12wion orDlem res;aaSon,or grera+otmaene-d o0'ver ager wtrert or tridge work Tererates partat snare. Flari6V Area 'aigati A1,p4n Fatvarde P1'*A#FarWaro ala eas%m&oad#Y Rot m Praerces. Mn007 b=xm 2twest+.38,4 Ataao 9.'s 4 lant+n9 pita: -atgra3s Aspin arta 3rds.P,a,ne m*la-,a.and astern roadleaf'ores: Provinces. Un,'DOT Otsinels 2 wes•.+,30.4,Moet,6.7 S I. DEEP MARSH•NO SEED DRAWN BY: EMK JOB 047E 8/13/2014 N0. DATE BY REV" DESCRIPTION! IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME SHEET N0. ORLINDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL .^/�•1 - 7APPLIED FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL APPROVED: DMM, DM JOB NUMBER: 12-0975 ENGINEER UNDER THE UWSOFTHE STATE OFMINNESOTA. NELSON RESTORATION DESIGN K AECOLOGICAL PROPOSED RESTORATION NOTES 3.2 cAD DATE; 8/15/14 SIGNATURE: �►a. er�SERVICES, INC. HRGreen ORONO, MINNESOTA CAD FILE: 120975cet20140813-RestAwg DATE: r Daniel Mielke REO.NO. INNML-IdEI� AND DETAILS