Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-22-2017 Council PacketAgenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, May 22, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda 1. Consent Agenda — Consent agenda items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under this section of the agenda. Items on the Consent Agenda are reviewed in total by the City Council and may be approved through one motion with no further discussion by the Council. Any item may be removed by any Council Member, staff member or person from the public for separate consideration. The City Council may add agenda items to be considered as part of the Consent motion. If you wish to remove any item from the Consent Agenda, please state the item number and description of the item. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Consent Agenda 2. Council Meeting of May 8, 2017 3. Claims/Bills 4. Licenses — Garbage Haulers 5. Surface Water Management Plan Proposal 6. Appointment of 2017 Seasonal Employees 7. #16-3822 Lakewest Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Extension of Effective Period of Preliminary Plat Approval — Resolution 8. # 17-3 922 City of Orono Text Amendment & Approval of Summary Ordinance for Publication: Wetland Regulations 9. #17-3911 Lakewest Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Interim Uses Summary Ordinance 10. City of Orono Text Amendment: Liquor Hours and Days of Off Sale 11. Special City Council Meeting for June 2, 2017 12. Special City Council Meeting for June 3, 2017 12a. Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Presentation 13. Westonka Historical Society Update — Pamela Myers Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, May 22, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Public Works/City Engineer Report 14. Annual Public Hearing for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase 11 Storm Water Permit Planning Department Report 15. #17-3910 Lakewest Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging — Resolution 16. #17-3929 Todd Irvine o/b/o Antoinette Beenders, 1669 North Farm Road, Variances (Average setback, bluff impacts) & Conditional Use Permit (Grading) — Resolution Mayor/Council Report 17. Resolution of Appreciation of Michael Gaffron City Administrator's Report City Attorney's Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2017 05-29-17 — Memorial Day, Monday, City Offices Closed 06-05-17 — Park Commission Work Session, Monday, 1:00 p.m. 06-12-17 — Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 06-19-17 — Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Dennis Walsh) 06-26-17 — Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 06-26-17 — Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 07-03-17 — Holiday Observed, Monday, City Offices Closed 07-04-17 — Independence Day, Tuesday, City Offices Closed 07-10-17 — Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 07-11-17 — Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Richard Crosby) 08-07-17 — Park Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. 08-14-17 — City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 08-14-17 — City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 08-21-17 — Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Aaron Printup) Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard Crosby, 11, Wendy Dankey, Aaron Printup, and Victoria Seals. Representing Staff were City Administrator Doug Reeder, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Senior Planner Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Soren Mattick, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA Item Nos. 11, 12a, and 17 were added to the Consent Agenda. 2. City Council Meeting Minutes of April 24, 2017 3. City Council Work Session Meeting of April 24, 2017 4. Claims/Bills 5. Licenses — Kennel License 6. Public Works Roof Repairs 7. #17-3927 Nathan and Beth Brandenburg, 825 Forest Arms Lane, Variance — Resolution No. 6757 8. #17-3928 Mike Hart, 2510 Casco Point Road, Conditional Use Permit — Resolution No. 6758 9. #17-3918 Rehkamp Larson o/b/o Bill Toles, 1095 Ferndale Road West, Resolution No. 6759 Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Brad Erickson, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, thanked the City Council for their approval of a resolution supporting his access to his business on County Road 112. Allan Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road, stated his concerns are regarding Eureka Construction at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road, which is zoned residential. Currently there is the storage of dirt on the site and quite possibly concrete crushing in the near future. Engleman stated he is quite aware that the Mayor and City Council ran on the platform that they were going to work for the citizens of Orono, and as a citizen, he would like their help. Engleman stated he would like to first ask the Council if they would want to have a construction site next to their house that includes storage and handling of dirt, large trucks, noise, and possibly a concrete Page 1 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued crushing operation with dust and noise that will be in the air long after the business is gone. Englernan stated as he indicated earlier, this property is residential and has been residential since he purchased his home in 1978. Engleman stated he knows the Council is aware of this project and that it is his understanding from Mike Gaffron approximately two weeks ago that Eureka was not going to crush concrete on the site as originally planned but possibly store some concrete pipe. Eureka has now started hauling and storing dirt without a permit from the Minnehaha Watershed Creek District. Engleman stated he is confused as to what is going on. Engleman asked what Eureka is doing on this site since they have no permits from the state or Orono for storing of dirt and possible concrete crushing. It appears that they are in violation of permits. Engleman stated he knows for sure that as of today they have not applied for an erosion permit from the Watershed District. Per conversations with John Hopkins at the State of Minnesota Pern-ritting, he has been told the state wants to work with municipalities on these projects. As of this afternoon, Hopkins is confused as to what Eureka and Orono is doing. Engleman provided documentation from the State of Minnesota and Department of Transportation. Engleman indicated it is a compilation of permits that Eureka applied for and was given. Engleman stated he would like the city attorney to read Line No. 2 on the second page out loud. Mattick stated it reads as follows: Standard conditions of miscellaneous work permits. If work to be done lies within the city or platted town, permission must also be obtained from such city or town. Engleman stated that means the City and the Council has something to say about it and that they cannot say they cannot do anything because the state owns the land. Mayor Walsh stated the state basically overrides everything in the City but the contractor will have to abide by Orono's working hours, hours of operation. Engleman asked about zoning. Walsh stated the state overrides the City's zoning. Walsh stated the state doesn't choose to do whatever they want all the time but that they do have the right to send someone onto their land without the City's approval. Engelman stated based on his interpretation of that sentence, the City of Orono can do something to help him and the other citizens, and that he is asking for their help. Engleman stated Eureka has received no permits from anybody and that he does not expect them to be working down there tomorrow. Englernan stated he expects them to be served with a cease and desist order from somebody. Walsh stated if they did not have a right to do something, the City would be the first entity there. Mattick noted there is no ordinance in Orono that allows rock crushing but the state's contractor is performing rock crushing on Highway 12. Mattick stated that is the same basic concept. Mattick stated there is a provision in the permit issued by the state which says the contractor has to receive permission, Page 2 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued which traditionally means they have to work with the City on their hours of operation. Mattick stated he understands Mr. Engleman does not want it next to his home and that he would be willing to contact the contractor. Engelman asked how the contractor can move in without any permits. Engleman noted the permit is for rock crushing only and that it does not say anything about storing pipe and black dirt, which is in violation of the permit. Mattick stated the City can make a call and take a look at it. Printup asked if the City can obtain a written response from the state explaining this issue. Mattick stated to his understanding they eliminated rock crushing from the site but they are using the site for storage. Walsh stated to his understanding they are going to move the rock crushing to a different site and that they will try to limit it to one day of rock crushing. Gaffron stated Daryl from Eureka informed Staff last week that they intend sometime this summer to potentially move their rock crushing activity to the site. What Eureka has said all along is that they will limit the rock crushing to one day or a short period of time. A couple of weeks ago Eureka informed the City that they plan to bring in black dirt and store it there. Gaffron stated he would not be surprised if the rock crushing involves a large pile of bituminous and concrete, which is similar to what is in front of Otten Brothers. Gaffron stated it is his understanding the rock crushing will not be a daily thing for weeks at a time but will instead be short-term. Seals commented it does not make sense to her that the same rules that apply to residents do not apply to the state's contractor. Engelman pointed out the rock crushing activity will also be closer to the apple orchard compared to the Eisinger property. Mattick stated cities exist because the state legislature created cities as well as the power and authority that they have. Under state statutes, states are only subject to the rules that they voluntarily subject themselves to. Mattick stated this is a fight that is common with cities and townships over who controls what, and generally speaking it is accepted that there is a hierarchy that has been created by the state. Mattick stated people tend to think that state and local governments will work with each, but the City has very limited authority in these types of situations. Mattick noted Hennepin County has worked with the City on access points, etc., and the City can attempt to work with the state on this issue. Mattick stated it is doubtful they will abandon the site. Seals stated she would like the City to approach the state and express the City's views. Crosby stated one question to think about is whether there is a better alternative site. Crosby stated the state and contractor might feel this is the only avenue available at this point. Page 3 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued Mattick stated even if it is moved to a new location, there will likely be a new neighbor expressing the same concerns. Mattick stated he does not know if there is any land available that would not impact anyone. Mattick stated the location makes sense and the land is owned by the state. Walsh stated currently the crusher is on the street or in the right-of-way and that they can be asked whether it can be moved four blocks away, which might help mitigate things. Engleman stated he does not understand how they can just move in and take over. Walsh noted the contractor had to have permission from the state to be on that site. Mattick stated Staff will take a look at it but that it is doubtful the state is not aware of it. Printup suggested the state also be infon-ned of the City's concerns, especially as it relates to the impacts to residential neighborhoods. Walsh stated the state is also looking at writing legislation to override the City's zoning ordinances as it relates to wireless technology, with the City not having the right to issue permits or collect fees. Walsh stated Orono would like to retain as much authority as possible. Crosby commented placing it in a different area might also impact additional people rather than two or three. Cliff Otten, 2350 West Wayzata Boulevard, stated a week ago the dust was so bad people could not see his property and the noise was so loud people could not hear. Since then the crusher has been moved out. Two weeks ago the contractor shut off access to Highway 12 but a temporary access has been created that will be open tomorrow or the next day. Otten commented Eureka seems to be willing to do whatever they can to accommodate the businesses. Otten indicated he had the same questions as Mr. Engleman. Otten stated he is not sure if they are going to move the crusher back in and that he is not sure how they can set up a crushing operation in front of a business. Walsh suggested Mr. Otten provide the contact information for the people he spoke with to Staff. Otten noted his Internet and phone lines have also been cut but that the contractor took steps to fix it. Crosby encouraged the residents to support the local businesses as much as possible. Richard Anderson, 3205 Crystal Bay Road, stated he wanted to commend the local fire departments for battling the recent marsh fire near Maple Plain. Page 4 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PRESENTATION 10. RECOGNITION OF BIG ISLAND DONATIONS Walsh thanked the following individuals for their generous donation to the Big Island docks: Tim Stevenson, Sean Foy, the Denny Walsh family, Michael Williams' business and family, John Kwakenat and Richie Anderson's marina and crew. Dankey moved, Seals seconded, to accept the donations for Big Island as follows: Tim Stevenson $2,000.00 Sean Foy $500.00 Denny Walsh Family $500-00 Michael Williams $2,500.00 John Kwakenat $500.00 VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT *11. ADA TRANSITION PLAN PROPOSAL Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to accept BMI's proposal of NTE of $9,624 to facilitate the development of Orono's ADA transition plan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 12. ORONO YOUTH FOOTBALL USE OF RACKBERRY PARK Edwards stated the Orono Youth Football Association has requested permission to use Hackberry Park for their practice sessions during the fall of 2017. With the Orono School District putting in a new field house, the number of practice fields has been decreased and various sports groups are starting to reach out to the City asking if they can use some of the parks for practice sessions. The Orono Parks Commission voted last week to create a subcommittee to look at the use of Orono park fields and how that will impact the nearby residents as well as creating a policy and fee schedule. Edwards noted currently the City does not have a field reservation system set up. Walsh commented it is a great way to use the parks and help out the different sports groups. Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to approve the Orono Youth Football Association's request to use Hackberry Park for flag football in the fall of 2017 for a fee of $20 per day. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *12a. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REASONABLE ACCESS TO COUNTY ROAD 112, WAYZATA BOULEVARD, FOR THE ORONO STATION — RESOLUTION NO. 6790 Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6790, a Resolution Supporting Reasonable Access to County Road 112, Wayzata Boulevard for the Orono Station. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 5 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT — BRUCE LEMKE, REPRESENTATIVE 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, was present. Gaffron stated the applicants received preliminary plat approval for a 27 -lot residential development of the Eisinger property in July of 2016. The property is guided and zoned for residential use. Currently the site is in the RR -113 zoning district, which will be rezoned to RPUD upon final plat approval. Pending more favorable market conditions, the applicants have chosen to not proceed immediately with residential development. However, the applicants have requested to be able to be allowed temporary use of the site for staging of construction activities, such as materials and equipment storage and a materials recycling yard for the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. That project is being done in phases and could take up to four to five years for completion. The proposed use for storage, construction staging and materials recycling is dissimilar to virtually every permitted conditional or accessory use in any of Orono's zoning districts. The only functional method for approving it is via an interim use permit. Orono's Zoning Code currently does not contain provisions for interim uses. The applicants are requesting in this application that the City amend the Zoning Code in order to allow interim uses. Staff would note that the contractor for Hennepin County for the Wayzata Boulevard project has obtained a permit from Mn/DOT to utilize the site at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road. That permit expires mid -2018. The applicants have requested that their application for a text amendment and an interim use permit be continued to be reviewed as they would like to be prepared for use of the Eisinger site for later phases of that project. MN Statute 462.3597 permits cities to allow interim uses. Interim use is defined by statute as a temporary use of a property until a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it. The statute indicates that a governmental body may grant permission for an interim use of a property if a number of conditions exist: First, the use conforms to the zoning regulations. Second, the date or the event will be terminated can be identified with certainty. Third, permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. The user also has to agree to any conditions that the governing body deems appropriate for permitting the use. Interim use may be terminated by a change in the zoning regulations. It is important to remember that a conditional use permit is permanent. It runs with the land and not with the property owner. In contrast, the interim use permit provides the tools necessary to sunset a use that may be appropriate for some temporary time period but it is not generally appropriate on a permanent basis. Staff has long felt that an interim use ordinance would be a very useful tool for Orono because it provides flexibility but with a high level of city control. In order to allow the proposed staging use on a temporary basis, the Code must be amended. This involves two elements of the Zoning Code: First, a general interim use ordinance must be adopted that establishes parameters for any interim use regardless of zoning district. A draft ordinance for discussion Page 6 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES — Continued and possible adoption is attached in the Council's packet as Exhibit A. Secondly, the RR -113 zoning district in which the subject property is located would be amended to include a section entitled Interim Uses similar to the permitted conditional and accessory uses that are located else in zoning code sections. A draft is included in the Council's packet as Exhibit B. The draft incorporates a number of parameters and conditions for the specific use entitled Temporary Facilities for Construction Staging Materials and Equipment Storage and Materials Recycling. hi considering whether the City should adopt an interim use ordinance, the Planning Commission reviewed a number of examples where a temporary use may be reasonable but is not appropriate at a given location on a pennanent basis. The Planning Commission looked at examples found in other Minnesota cities' codes and they are typically tied to a specific zoning district within each of those cities. While there are some consistencies, it also appears that every city has its own ideas of what to regulate via an interim use permit. In some instances cities are using IU?s to regulate activities or uses that Orono has historically regulated as a permitted use or as a conditional use or as an accessory use or even via licensing. The Planning Commission also looked at conditions placed on similar equipment storage and interim use code sections for three other Minnesota cities which allow this use. Changes recommended by the Planning Commission have been incorporated into the ordinance and are outlined in Staff s report. The Planning Commission considered the advantages as well as the disadvantages and some cautions with regard to interim use permits. The advantages include adding the ability to allow for a specified interim use in a specific zoning district, it gives the City and property owner a method or a tool for the temporary use of a property, and it provides an option for properties that are expected to be developed in the future in conformity with the zoning code but for various reasons such future development will not occur immediately, which is the case before the Council tonight. An example of a property is the site at the intersection of County Road 6 and Highway 12. That property operated under a nonconforming use permit as early as 1968. That site was always zoned as single family but it went through a variety of different uses through the years. The building eventually became a daycare center. At some point Mn/DOT determined that property would be needed for the Highway 12 bypass and the daycare use was discontinued. It would be a number of years before that part of the bypass would be constructed, and during that time the City had a variety of inquiries from business people essentially saying they would like to use that building for a few years, such as an insurance office, but the City did not have an interim use ordinance at that time and there was no way that temporary use could be allowed. There are some disadvantages and some cautions with an interim use ordinance. If the Council approves an amendment to the Zoning Code to allow interim uses, the City, the property owners, and the developers will have to be very clear about the parameters for such use. Clear and concise documentation of the allowed land use activities and time periods will be required with each IUP that is issued. To avoid any confusion or misunderstanding, it will be important that all parties know the conditions and time limitations established for the interim use permit. Page 7 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES — Continued Having any interim use option introduces the potential for property owners to propose land uses that are inappropriate for a given site. The use could be disruptive to neighboring land owners or be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding area. Business activities that could potentially be harmful to the public health, safety and welfare could be proposed. Because of this, the City must be diligent, not only in establishing appropriate interim uses within specific zoning districts, but in monitoring those uses for compliance with the established terms of each fUP. hi the text that is before the City Council tonight, there are some changes that were recommended by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would like to see a review at least annually as opposed to annually of any interim use permit that is issued. They would also like the language that the property must be in compliance with all applicable City code standards be removed since it is inherently in conflict with the flexibility that is offered via the interim use permit conditions. That text is Exhibit A. Exhibit B is a separate ordinance that changes the text of the RR -IB District, which is a two -acre single- family rural residential zone. Exhibit B has been revised slightly from the version reviewed by the Planning Commission to reflect the intent that the use must be for a project in Orono, that the use must be on a property adjacent to the public road being constructed or reconstructed, and the submitted plans must also include a schedule and timing of the proposed activity. As currently drafted, the RR -113 amendment does not contain certain specific parameters for the construction staging and use. That could be added if the Council desires. Those parameters include whether there should be a minimum separation distance from nearby residential structures or lot lines, whether there should be a minimum lot size for that interim use, whether there should be requirements for site and adjacent road maintenance and traffic control measures, and that it should be allowed only for government sponsored improvement projects as opposed to private projects. The City Council has wide latitude to approve or deny any interim use penrnit for any given site. The Council may establish any conditions for approval that the Council deems appropriate. The above mentioned limitations and conditions could be inserted into the RR-lB ordinance as a required standard that would require determination now as to the separation distance or the lot size. The other option is to insert simply a listing of parameters without numerical distance or sizes that could be discussed in reviewing each interim use request that comes before the City. If the Council wishes to establish appropriate numerical standards now, then a discussion should be held regarding minimum lot size and separate distances. Gaffron stated Council is requested to review the proposed use and the draft ordinance text amendments. If the Council concludes that the Zoning Code should be amended to allow for Interim Uses, and that the proposed road construction and staging activity should be an allowed interim use in the RR- I B zoning district when all appropriate conditions are met, then the ordinances should be considered for adoption or amendment. If the Council determines that additional consideration of the requested amendments is needed, then tabling would be in order. If a referral to the Planning Commission is desired, then specific direction for such additional review should be provided. Page 8 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES — Continued Printup asked what the process would be if there are violations, such as fill coming from outside the City and the City is considering ending the use. Mattick stated the person would be entitled to a public hearing and that Staff could not administratively revoke or suspend the permit. The Council could revoke the permit following a public hearing if there is a single violation. The City could also issue a letter to the property owner requesting they stop a certain activity. Printup asked if there have been cases in other cities where their interim use permits have been revoked. Mattick indicated he is not aware of any litigation. Mattick stated in his view 1UPs are underused by cities. Mattick noted the use is not meant to be there forever and the City has wide latitude on what conditions it would like to impose. The use is also not grandfathered under an 1UP. Walsh commented it gives the City a good tool to use that helps residents use their land a little more. Mattick stated the more common uses are such things as gravel pits or other intensified uses but it can also be used in redevelopment zones. Mattick stated it gives the City a very flexible tool to use. Walsh noted it also gives the City the ability to test different uses. Printup commented it almost sounds too good to be true and that he questions whether the City can deny the use on one property if it is allowed on another. Mattick noted the use does not have to be allowed in all residential zones and that certain setbacks could be required. Mattick noted the area could also be rezoned to eliminate the interim use. Walsh stated the underlying conditions would help limit where the use can go but that it does provide the City the ability to allow residents to use their properties in different ways. Crosby asked whether any of the neighboring cities utilize interim use permits. Gaffron stated he is not aware of any right now but that Maple Grove has utilized 11JPs. There were no public comments regarding this item. Gaffron stated the Exhibit A ordinance can probably be adopted as is. As far as Exhibit 13, which is the RR-lB district, there are some question marks on whether they should be included that have been highlighted by Staff. Gaffron noted under Item 1, there is a question whether the facilities should be associated with adjacent government-sponsored public road construction. Page 9 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES — Continued Walsh stated he does not know if Items C and D are necessary since the Council could limit that at the time of the permit application. Walsh stated in his view Item E is necessary. Walsh moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 194, Third Series, an Ordinance Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Code by Adding Article XIV Regarding Interim Uses; and to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 195, Third Series, an Ordinance Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Code by Adding Section 78-421 Regarding Interim Uses Within the RR -IB Zoning Districts, removing Items (1)c and (1)d as well as the words government sponsored under Item 1. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Printup Opposed. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, was present. Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting the City approve a permit for interim use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities that are associated with the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. The application can only be approved if the companion application for an interim use ordinance, which has been done tonight. There appear to be few suitable options for the staging area that would have minimal impacts on neighboring properties. This site at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard would appear to score high marks in terms of such a use. This site is open and relatively flat, has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard, it is large enough for the intended activities, and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development. The nearest home is 700 feet away across Wayzata Boulevard and the other property is 1000 feet from any homes to the southwest across the freeway so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc., should be minimal as compared to other properties along the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. Gaffron noted the grinding and recycling operation has been conducted in the Wayzata Boulevard right- of-way for the past few weeks. The magnitude of any negative impacts to the adjoining business properties is unknown; although, the Council did hear a little bit about it during the public comments section. The portion of the site for construction staging is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The landfill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and ensure appropriate runoff. The current owners have had significant soil borings done in order to determine the extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. That information was obtained as part of their 2016 development proposal. The area that gained preliminary approval for residential development is not within the proposed temporary staging area. The proposed site use plan indicates a rock entrance for residential development would be located off of Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed site use plan indicates the entrance is located where the proposed Page 10 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued access for the residential development is to be located. That access has been approved by Hennepin County as a temporary construction access for this recycling activity. The Watershed District has approved an erosion control permit for the construction staging activity. The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no concerns with use of the site for construction staging. The public works director has indicated the location is likely as good of a location that the contractor will find for construction staging. The site plan suggests that temporary lighting will be likely employed but that is not known for a fact. In order to minimize traffic flow issues, some work might occur at night and it would be appropriate that any temporary lighting be downcast or directed away from residential areas. The site plan indicates a proposed visual and noise screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is working with the Pollution Control Agency to establish parameters and obtain permits for that permit, which will become an amenity for future residential development. The City will require a grading plan be approved for that and potentially will require a conditional use permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. The applicant has suggested that to make this use financially viable, the site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. The Planning Commission looked at this use and recommended that it should be solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and should not be used to support other projects. The Planning Commission did not want the industrial use at this site to become a regional site and it should have a definite end date commiserate with the Wayzata Boulevard improvements, which will likely last three or four years. The Planning Commission has reviewed this application on two separate occasions and recommended unanimous approval based on the following conditions: End date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements or three years, whichever is sooner. 2. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. The hours of operation are to be limited as follows: - Monday through Friday, normal construction hours, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. - Saturday, 8 a.m. to noon only and limited to low-volume in -out activity, no heavy hauling. - Sunday, no activity whatever. 4. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. The proposal must meet MPCA guidelines and provide dust control from construction and recycling activities. Page 11 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued 5. Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. 6. An ongoing 6 -month review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata boulevard improvement project. In terms of public comments, at both the March and April meetings, public comments were received from Alan Engleman generally in opposition to the use of residentially zoned lands for what he sees as a commercial/industrial use. The minutes from both those meetings have been included in the Council packet. In addition, a letter was received from the Dumas family, who owns the apple orchard to the east, objecting to the proposed use at the Eisinger site which abuts their property. The interim use standards require that an IUP request be considered with respect to the conditional use permit standards of the Zoning Code. Staff s report contains an analysis of the conditional use permit requirements. The requirements address a number of issues. Gaffron recommended the Council review those requirements and see whether they are in agreement. The analysis also discusses consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, adequacy of service by police, fire, and stonn water management, etc. It also addresses compatibility with the surrounding area, the need for screening, and the impacts to traffic and lighting. hi the draft IUP ordinance text, there are three specific pieces of information that are required to be submitted, and are as follows: I Written documentation that includes a complete description of the use, schedule for commencement and termination of the use, hours and dates of operation, and anticipated employment. 2. Any special studies requested by the City when there is evidence that the proposed use may negatively impact public infrastructure, the environment or adjacent land uses. These studies may examine the impacts on such things as traffic, environment, wetlands and utilities. Evidence of approval or preliminary approval from all other agencies with jurisdiction over elements of the use. The Council should review the information provided and discuss with the applicants any items of note as well as any additional concerns of the Council. If the Council determines that an IUP for this site should be granted, Staff should be directed to draft a resolution for consideration incorporating the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and any other conditions the Council determines are necessary. If the Council determines that more information is required, the application may be tabled and direction given to Staff and applicant. If Council determines that an I-UP should not be issued for this site, the application should be denied. Seals asked where this property is located. Page 12 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Gaffron illustrated the location of the property. Gaffron pointed out the landfill area and the area for the future development, the wetlands, the property boundary on the east, the access point, and the apple orchard. Seals asked if there is a way to verify that the contractor is truly only doing things related to this project. Gaffron indicated it would not be a simple process to monitor everything that happens on the property and that the City would likely have to hire someone and require submittal of daily bills of lading for what is brought to the site. Dankey commented this is a good location since it is far enough away from the businesses and residential homes. It is also a good use of a vacant lot. Walsh asked if the applicants are talking about storage or rock crushing or both. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, stated their first priority was to do rock crushing or asphalt recycling for the Highway 112 improvement project but they did not recognize the amount of time it would take for approval. As a result, the contractor started looking for alternatives and then began using the Mn/DOT site. Fretham, stated he is hopeful that use of this site will help alleviate some of the concerns that have been expressed. Fretham stated in their view it is a good site for this type of activity and that they believe they can manage the process well given their experience with other similar projects. Fretharn stated he understands there has been concern that product will come in from other locations. Fretharn stated if that is not allowed, he would be losing a competitive edge because the contractor is using a taxpayer owed property free of rent and he does not have to go through the permitting process, which creates an uneven playing field. In order to get the contractor to use this site, it is likely they will have to be given the opportunity to bring other material to this site apart from the Highway 112 project. Fretharn noted the contractor would be using the Mn/DOT site for this year and that he will need to incentivize them in some way in order to get them to use this site. Fretham. noted he did hear public comments tonight that the contractor was performing the crushing downtown but that he did not hear any of them say it was dusty. Fretharn stated he is looking for approval to perform crushing and storage on the site. Seals asked if the other sites would go away if this site is approved. Fretharn stated he believes so. Fretham stated it is hard to get the contractor to agree until he has received approval. Walsh stated the question would be where they would do it if this site is not approved and the Mn/DOT site is not available. Dankey stated if she was a business owner, she would not be happy. Page 13 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Seals commented she would rather have it where it is presently located than next to someone's house or an apple orchard. Walsh stated the crushing activity is the bigger issue than the storage of construction materials. Crosby noted a time limit can be placed on this specific activity. Dankey asked if these activities would definitely occur at the site if approval was given. Frethain indicated it is not. Fretham stated they still intend to go through with the residential development that was recently approved at some point, but given the other residential development in town, he felt it would be better to wait. As a result, other uses for the property in the meantime were considered. Walsh stated the crusher is a bigger issue given the dust and pollutants. Printup asked where the activity would take place. Fretham stated the activity would be located on the far west side of the site and the arrows depict the truck route in and out of the site. Printup asked if the soils in the landfill area will support the weight of the equipment. Gaffron stated the Council can ask the developer to provide those studies if they deem them appropriate but that he is not sure if anyone has looked at the carrying capacity of that area. Crosby commented he would be more concerned about the soils once the residential project starts. Fretham stated they have done over 100 soil boring holes as well as other different analyses that an engineering firm is analyzing. In addition, they will be working with the Pollution Control Agency to come up with a cleanup plan for the site. Fretham stated they do intend to come back at some point with a redevelopment plan for the western portion as well. Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on this application. Allan Engleman asked when he applied for this permit. Engleman stated it looks to be February 2 1. Gaffron indicated that is correct. Engleman noted Eureka obtained the permit on February 13 but did not inform anybody, including Staff, until he informed Staff about it on April 4. Engleman commented this was all under the table until February. Gaffron noted Fretharn has been speaking with Staff long before February 21 about this project. Page 14 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Walsh stated it sounds like Mr. Fretham has to go through a lot more permitting than the contractor. No additional public comments were received. Crosby stated in his view this property is a better spot than the Mn/DOT property since the City can set parameters on the use and it is further away. Crosby stated he is not as concerned with the quality of the soil until they are ready to build the residential development. Printup stated he disagrees with the location and that in his view there is no suitable site in Orono. Seals indicated she agrees with Council Member Printup. Walsh stated he has concerns with the apple orchard and the dust. Walsh stated they also have the Mn/DOT site and the question is whether the City can mitigate that site in some way. Walsh stated he is not in favor of rock crushing in Orono but noted that activity is currently occurring in downtown Long Lake in front of Otten Brothers. Walsh asked if they would be able to get the storage moved to this site but not the rock crushing part. Mattick stated the City can allow it on this site but that the City has limited control over the Mn/DOT site. Walsh stated he would prefer no crushing on this site but that the City cannot tell the contractor not to use the Mn/DOT site, which is closer to the apple orchard. Walsh stated he also is not in favor of other debris from other cities' projects being brought to this site. Dankey noted there is a residential development being constructed right next to the apple orchard as well and that the use will be for a limited amount of time. Dankey stated the permit can also be terminated at any time if the City deems it appropriate. Seals asked Mr. Engleman if he has a preference for which site it would be at. Engleman stated it would be better on the Eisinger property since it would be further away but noted the Council is concerned about the contamination to the site. Engleman noted the rock crushing will also contaminate the state land. Engleman stated in his view the City should get some money for the rock crushing and that the City should not have to support them. Print -up asked where the runoff goes off of the Eisinger site. Gaffron stated whatever runs off the existing Eisinger site goes to the wetlands and that the developer could possibly construct some settling basins to help slow the runoff and help it infiltrate. Gaffron stated if the Council is interested in those conditions, they can be imposed, but Staff would need to look into it. Fretham stated the black dotted silt fence that goes around the entire perimeter of the site is to control runoff. Fretham noted they have obtained the Watershed permit so they have reviewed the storm water management for the site. Page 15 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Fretham noted this would be a recycling operation, and the closer you do the recycling to the activity, the less fuel that is used and the fewer emissions. Fretham stated a number of cities are allowing the rock crushing to occur closer to the activity since it cuts down on truck traffic and that he has done this type of operation in much denser neighborhoods in St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, and Minnetonka. Crosby commented it would also expedite the project if it is local. Crosby indicated he would not be in favor of allowing other projects to come in and that it could be limited just specifically to this project. Crosby stated the rock crushing activity would be better on the Eisinger property than in front of someone's business. Walsh stated they currently have the rock crusher right in front of Otten Brothers but that could be moved in front of the apple orchard or the school at some point. Dankey and Crosby stated the Eisinger property is less intrusive. Walsh stated the goal is to have it as far away as possible from the businesses and residents. Seals commented the City has not really pushed back against Mn/DOT and that the City can at least try to discuss this with WDOT. Seals stated she is not enthused about having it in Orono at all and that she would not want it next to her house or next to an apple orchard. Dankey noted the residential development is happening right next to the apple orchard. Walsh indicated he is in agreement with working with Mn/DOT but that the Council also needs to provide some direction to Staff. Mattick stated tabling it would allow Staff to speak with Hennepin County representatives and then Staff could draft some language that could be either incorporated into a resolution or a letter. Seals commented she would feel better about that and that she would not be happy if someone just showed up next to her and started a rock crushing activity. Seals stated she would like Staff to speak with Mn/DOT to see what can be done to help mitigate things. Walsh stated that would allow the process to keep moving forward as well as allow Staff to obtain additional information. Dankey stated she would prefer the rock crushing not occur in downtown Long Lake but that she also does not want both sites to be used. Crosby stated he would like to get the storage and crushing away from the residents and businesses as much as possible. Mattick noted the highway project is being done in phases and that Mn/DOT would likely not be subject to the City's permit. Mattick stated Staff will need to look into it a little bit. Walsh commented it will be an ongoing process and that the Council will have to look at it periodically. Page 16 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Engleman noted the permit says nothing about stockpiling dirt and that he is not sure why they are doing it. Walsh stated Staff will be speaking with all the parties involved. Seals moved, Printup seconded, to table Application No. 17-3910, Lake West Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 15. #17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, was present. Gaffron stated this is a sketch plan review for a proposed 2 -lot subdivision of a vacant property located at the northerly end of Ivy Place on Casco Point. The property currently consists of three tax parcels just totaling over two acres. It is located at the end of a peninsula. Each of the two lots would exceed the 1/2 - acre minimum lot size of the LR- I C district. It requires 1 00 -foot lot width. The property has remained vacant since it was created by filling the wetlands in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The property is encumbered by a number of easements and does not abut a dedicated public roadway except via easements across the adjoining property at 3560 Ivy Place. It was originally platted as tracts W and X back in 1955. Gaffron displayed an aerial photograph of the property back in the 1950s. A progression of aerial photos shows how the property evolved through the years, mainly through the placement of fill in the area of the wetlands. By 1967, the area is totally filled in and there are very few trees. In 197 1, the property is starting to be filled in with volunteer trees such as buckthorn. In 1975, there was an application to replat the property from three lots to two lots, which is what is being proposed today. That application was approved by the City Council but the property owner never filed the plat. At that time a number of the nearby neighbors were opposed to the subdivision saying that the area was filled. In 1975, Orono completed a wetland inventory and identified the entire property as wetland. Gaffron stated he is not sure why it was identified as wetland at that time. Today there is one little wetland approximately 10' x 17' and is difficult to recognize as wetland. Gaffron indicated he spoke with the DNR about this property within the last year and they have indicated they are not opposed to someone building on the site. There are a variety of existing easements on and adjacent to the property. There is also a sewer line that runs along the southwest shoreline. Gaffron noted the City restored that shoreline along with the Watershed District. Some of the easements on the property include an easement for a cul-de-sac, which was never built; a private driveway easement; a roadway easement; a view easement which limits the number, location and height of the homes; and various utility easements. The applicant has approached Page 17 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 15. # 17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — Continued the property owner who has the view easement to see whether there is any chance of changing that easement. There is a neighbor that also has a deck and a driveway that encroaches into the setback. The property is a peninsula that is wooded with mostly poor -quality volunteer trees. The land is relatively flat, with some portions of the site actually being located within the floodplain. Some mitigation measures may be required as a result. Each of the two proposed lots exceeds the minimum acreage requirements. Each lot is supposed to face on a public street or an appropriate private easement. The applicants are proposing to create a 30 -foot wide outlot to meet City standards. Lot 2, being platted as a back lot given the unusual property shape and access limitations, more than meets the 15 0 percent lot area requirement. Each lot exceeds the 100 - foot width requirement. The front/back lot configuration was recommended by Staff as the most conforming method of converting these three lots into two. In order to convert the three lots into two lots, a new, relocated access corridor to get past proposed Lot I is necessary. Since the property is located on a peninsula, with both lots having shoreline on two sides, the average lakeshore setback appears to be defined by the location of the adjacent home at 3560 Ivy. Since any new homes on Lots I and 2 must be at least 75 feet from the shore, Staff would suggest that 75 feet become the required average setback regardless of which of Lots I or 2 is built on first. As a result, the line between proposed Lots I and 2 becomes the front lot line, requiring a 45 -foot setback when the back lot 150 percent of standard setbacks rule is applied. The proposed driveway extends from the end of traveled Ivy Place through the road easement across 3560 Ivy and is proposed to be constructed as an 8 -foot wide paved driveway within Outlot A. The actual driving surface is proposed to be mostly 30 feet from the shore, while portions will be within 12 to 25 feet from the shoreline. Maximum driveway width allowed within 75 feet of the lake is eight feet. The proposed driveway will require a hardcover variance. While eight feet is minimal for a driveway serving two residences, that is the maximum width allowed by code within 75 feet of the lake. With the driveway being so close to the lake, it would be appropriate that stormwater management facilities be established to mitigate impacts of runoff from the driveway. It is likely that re -grading of substantial portions of the site will be proposed and a number of trees will likely be removed. The need for grading within the 0-75 foot protected zone should be carefully reviewed at the time a preliminary plat application is proposed. Staff does not believe there is any reasonable way to construct a cul-de-sac since it would eliminate the ability to construct more than one house. That cul-de-sac would also be within 75 feet of the lake. The Fire Chief has suggested the residences be provided with fire suppression sprinkler systems given the narrowness of Ivy Street and the narrow width of the driveway. Gaffron stated it might be reasonable to widen the width of the driveway to 10 feet, which would require a variance. The applicants are proposing a fairly short backup apron on both lots, which Staff does not feel is a big issue. Construction traffic would need to be located on site. The property is served by municipal water and sewer and some fees will be required. There is also a sewer connection for the house at 3560 coming across into this property, which will need to be located and determined if an easement is required. Page 18 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 15. # 17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — Continued The property will require a Conservation Design report. Gaffron noted this is a sketch plan review and that the applicant is looking for direction from the City Council. Crosby asked what the height limitation is and whether the second house could be two stories. Gaffron indicated it is one story for the house closest to 3560 Ivy and the second house can be two stories. Dankey stated she used to live in the area and that the lagoon was created at some point. Dankey asked if additional fill would need to be brought in. Fretham indicated some additional fill will need to be brought in but not a lot. Fretham stated they will be mitigating on another site and this site will be brought above the 100 -year floodplain elevation. Crosby stated in his view a wider driveway is necessary as well as a sprinkler system for the homes. Chief Van Eyll indicated the fire hydrant is located at the end of the road by the lift station. Seals asked if the applicant would be willing to construct one house. Fretham stated that is a possibility but that they are interested in constructing two properties. Fretham noted the property has been taxed as buildable lots for many years and that there are a number of properties in town that have also been filled. Walsh asked if he is fine with the comments from the fire chief. Fretham indicated he is fine with them and that they were not unexpected. Crosby asked if he is willing to limit the house to one story. Fretham stated they are looking at a payment to that property owner to change the view easement which would allow them to build two stories in order to shrink the footprint of the homes. Crosby asked what type of footprint they are considering. Fretham indicated they are looking at 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. There were no public comments regarding this application. Gaffron noted in front of the City Council are two letters from 1987 and 2012 between the Lupient family and the property owners of those two dates in which the Lupient family allowed the use of the southerly end of the 3560 property to have a boat lift. Gaffron indicated the applicant will have to work that out at some point. The property owner at 35600 has expressed concerns via their attorney with regards to the close proximity of the house as well as drainage and runoff issues. Page 19 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 15. # 17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — Continued Fretharn stated they will address that neighbor's concerns and that the situation should be improved as part of this project. Fretham indicated he has also met with the neighbor regarding the view easement and that they believe by getting further along in this process it will make those discussions easier. Crosby asked if there is only one neighbor that has an issue with the view. Gaffron indicated there is one lot that has a view easement. Gaffron noted the Planning Commission also discussed restricting construction parking and storage of materials to the site only. Fretham stated the property consists of over two acres and that they will be able to accommodate the construction parking and material storage. The City Council took no formal action on this item. (Recess taken from 9:12 p.m. to 9:19 p.m.) 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. Barnhart stated before the City Council tonight is a proposed text amendment related to wetland regulations. Wetland regulations, and primarily the setbacks related to wetlands, ranked number six on the Council's priorities set last fall. The Development Process Review Comniittee also recommended that the wetland regulations be reviewed to be more consistent with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. There are two primary areas where the City ordinances differ from the Watershed District rules. Those areas are buffer setbacks and when wetland delineations are required. Barnhart noted there is a difference between a buffer and a setback. A wetland buffer is established by the Watershed District as a "No -Touch" area when the Watershed District requires a delineation. No activity may occur in the buffer. This buffer distance ranges from 12.5 to 75 feet depending on the type of wetland. The Watershed allows buffer averaging, which is an increase of the buffer depth in one area of the lot to reduce it in another area. A wetland setback is established by the City. No structure may be built within the setback but other activity may occur in that area. Orono's setbacks vary between 35 feet and 85 feet. Currently, city code requires a 3 5 -foot setback minimum and is often used when no buffer has been established by the Watershed District. Barnhart stated in situations where there is a wetland but a buffer has not been required, the City requires a 35 -foot setback or whatever the wetland buffer would be. Walsh asked why the Watershed District would say no wetland buffer is necessary. Page 20 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Barnhart stated the Watershed District may not require a wetland delineation in certain situations under their rules and then a wetland buffer would also not be required by the Watershed District. Barnhart stated in drafting the proposed text amendment, he looked at what other cities are doing. Minnetonka Beach has a 25 -foot setback from the edge of a wetland, Minnetonka requires a 35 -foot setback from the wetland overlay district and 10 feet from the buffer, Minnetrista measures 35 feet from the wetland edge, and Plymouth uses a straight 15 -foot setback from the buffer. Overall Orono is basically in line with what the other cities are following. The Planning Commission was provided with three options to review at their April meeting. Those are as follows: Recognizing that the Watershed District's focus is regional and the City's is smaller, retain the existing setback requirements and make no changes to buffers. 2. Recognizing the City's role in water quality protection, yet balance the need for use of land, reduce the setback to 22 feet where no buffer is required or has been established. The 22 feet is nine and one half feet more than the shortest possible buffer required by the Watershed District for residential properties. In addition, 22 feet is a memorable setback, less likely to be lost in the mind of the applicant, to the benefit of protecting the wetland. Completely defer buffer requirements to the Watershed District and remove the requirement of a setback from undeclared buffers and the additional ten feet from declared buffers. Following a lengthy discussion, the Planning Commission ultimately recommended no changes to the buffer setback based on the information before them. The Planning Commission did recommend, however, some changes to the wetland delineation language. The City currently requires a formal delineation on any property where a project is within 150 feet of a wetland regardless of the type of wetland. The Watershed District only requires a wetland delineation when specific wetland rules are triggered, which is usually when a new home is built or the property is subdivided. Walsh noted wetland delineations can only be done when the vegetation is actively growing, which is May through mid-October, and that this change would provide Staff with some flexibility. Barnhart noted the Watershed District also requires a 15 -day comment period following completion of the delineation to allow residents to comment on it. The proposed ordinance would allow Orono to accept information for a desk review in lieu of a formal delineation for projects not likely to impact the wetland due to project scope, distance, and/or topography, similar to methods employed by the Watershed District. If the applicant disagrees with the City's interpretation of the wetland boundary, a full delineation may be provided. Walsh stated if the information is more conservative and the resident does not agree with it, he would have the ability to obtain a formal wetland delineation. Page 21 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Barnhart concurred the property owner would have the option to obtain a wetland delineation. Barnhart noted the text amendment would allow Staff to approve the delineation if the proposed improvement is outside of the 35 -foot area. Barnhart stated the City has received a number of comments for and against the buffer/setback changes. Those in support of removing or reducing the setback feel the use of their land is being compromised unnecessarily. Those in support of retaining the setback rules favor preservation of Orono character and long-standing values. Barnhart noted the names in bold on Staff s memorandum are the ones that the Council has already received. Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance as drafted. Walsh stated the Code Review Committee has been reviewing all of the City's ordinances and regulations over the past five to six months and that this was one of their recommendations. Walsh stated in his view the desktop delineation is a good way to give Staff another tool and to expedite the process. Walsh stated in terms of the setback regulations, he saw three different issues. One was whether ten feet was a reasonable distance beyond the wetland. Walsh noted they talked at the Planning Commission and the Code Review Committee about how a I 0 -foot setback is needed in general and that it is a reasonable number because it allows the property owner the ability to mow in that area and to have a small yard. In terms of the 35 -foot setback, the Planning Commission did talk about how that number is somewhat arbitrary. Walsh noted the lowest setback buffer from the Watershed District is 12.5 feet. With ten feet on top of that, you come up with 22.5 feet. Walsh stated the City basically took the 12 feet required by the Watershed District and added 12 feet to come up with the 22 feet. Currently the City requires a 35 - foot setback. Walsh noted under current regulations, if someone wanted to put a fire pit within that area, they would not be allowed to do that. Walsh stated in his view it is worthy of a discussion regarding what items can be placed within that setback to allow people a little more use of their yards. Crosby asked if Minnetonka Beach has a 25 -foot setback without the buffer being included. Barnhart stated 25 feet is a setback from the buffer. Walsh stated if there is no buffer, Minnetonka Beach would require a 25 -foot buffer and Orono would require 35 feet. Seals asked what additional information the Planning Commission would have benefited from. Seals asked whether there are any studies that show the differences in the quality of water between the communities where there are different setbacks. Seals stated the question is whether Orono's regulations are making a difference. Barnhart stated there are a number of studies out there that support buffers, which is one part of the solution. The setback requirement is the City's part in the solution. The Planning Commission was Page 22 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued uncomfortable with shifting the policy without data that suggested the City needed to or identified a true problem. Barnhart stated part of the discussion tonight should be to question whether the City is on the right path with the setback. The Planning Commission did not feel they had enough information to answer that question since the City has not heard that the setbacks have no value. Seals asked why the Watershed District does not also require setbacks in addition to the buffer. Barnhart indicated the Watershed District looks region wide and the rules are applied the same across that area. The Watershed District looks to cities to implement stricter rules on a lot by lot basis if the situation calls for it. Walsh commented it does not affect the amount of hardcover allowed on a lot or the height of a building and that it comes down to whether the 35 -foot setback is reasonable. Barnhart noted Plymouth has a 15 -foot accessory structure setback and Medina has a 5 -foot setback, which would allow fire pits and other similar structures in that area. Seals asked whether the Planning Commission looked at different options for that area, such as nothing within 10 feet or 15 feet, or whether fire pits or other structures should be allowed. Barnhart stated they did not get into that level of detail but more questioned the purpose of the setback. Printup stated there is no question that the buffer areas should be left alone. Printup questioned whether there is a differentiation about whether a fire pit causes water to become contaminated. Printup noted people are spraying their lawns in that area and that his belief is that a fire pit is pretty innocuous. Barnhart stated allowing structures within the setback can lead to improvement creep since the edge will move depending upon the whim of the property owner, which happens now. Barnhart stated he is not sure he would advocate for placing a fire pit near a wetland since there are usually tall grasses that are often dry and can catch fire. Walsh concurred that someone should not put anything in the buffer. Barnhart noted there are situations where there is a wetland with no buffer but there is a setback. Walsh commented that could be dealt with separately. Walsh asked for public comment. Paul Muldoon, 1801 West Farm Road, stated the proposal to do the desktop wetland delineations is a step forward since it will provide builders feedback in a timely fashion and accommodates seasonal changes. Muldoon stated in terms of the setbacks, he strongly supports option one, which makes no changes. Muldoon noted Orono began implementing their wetland regulations and protections in 1980 and that there are several reasons for buffers and setbacks, such as a practical need for an additional setback from Page 23 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued the setback in terms of property maintenance and recreation, and a scientific basis to promote cleaner water by absorbing toxins, to provide essential wildlife corridors, and to provide open spaces and vistas in the neighborhoods, which helps contribute to the rural nature of Orono. Muldoon stated since only a few variances were approved last year to wetland setbacks, they appear to be acceptable to 99 percent of the people in the community. In terms of scientific support, Orono's setbacks meet the Fish and Wildlife Department's guidelines, and it is likely the actual recommended distances are 50 to 100 percent greater than what Orono requires. Aesthetically, the wetland setbacks serve the purpose of allowing wildlife to live in harmony with humans and have equal access to some of the waterways. Muldoon commented he is sympathetic to homeowners and builders that have issues with unique topography challenges and that he agrees they should be able to ask for variances if there are undue hardships. Muldoon indicated he has reached out to a few builders regarding these issues and that they indicated they do not see the regulations themselves as being the source of the problem but the fact that it takes time to review variances, even routine ones. Muldoon stated it is likely everyone would agree that allowing desktop review of wetland delineations would speed up the approval process and address a number of issues. Muldoon stated it is his understanding Orono just reviewed and redefined their wetland regulations four years ago and that the existing setbacks were agreed on by the town and the City Council and Staff. The Planning Commission at their last meeting recommended to leave the wetland setback as is. Muldoon stated in his view it is unnecessary to change the setbacks since it is inconsistent with the view of the majority of the residents. Muldoon stated in the interests of maintaining Orono's special character, the residents' opposition to the change, and the ability of the City to maintain local control over the environment, he would strongly urge the City Council to keep the existing protections. Seals asked whether Mr. Muldoon feels the general public would be okay with variances being approved if the topography poses a challenge. Muldoon stated he does not see a hardship to the residents since the regulations have been in place for quite some time and they have been abiding by them. Muldoon stated as far as reducing the regulations, in his opinion it is a real risk to the water quality, the wildlife, and invites additional density near the wetlands. Muldoon stated if the City continues to squeeze the setbacks, invariably they will get requests for more and more homes. Muldoon stated in his view they are losing ground even though they have these regulations and that he is concerned about hardcover in the buffer and setback areas and what that runoff will do to the waterways. Jay Kinve, 950 Willow View Drive, stated he is opposed to the opinion that was just read by Mr. Muldoon on the setbacks but that he does agree with the establishment of the desktop review and the penrianent nature of wetland reviews and permanent buffers. Kinve stated that makes all the sense in the world since it is a big hassle and expense when new delineations are required by the City even though the Watershed District does not require them. Kinve noted they are talking about wetlands and they are not talking about Lake Minnetonka or Long Lake. Kinve stated ironically the lakes have fewer protections from runoff than wetlands do and that a Page 24 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued lake owner can have a yard right up to the edge of the water as well as riprap and stone that allows the water to run off faster into the lake. In addition, there is no buffer of uncompacted soil and no 16 to 20 feet of weed bed. Kinve stated that would provide water protection and buffers that would dramatically improve water quality around the lake. Kinve stated for a lot of people that are concerned about water quality, they associate it with the lakes, where wetlands already have a lot of built-in protections that lake properties do not. Kinve noted an MCWD buffer provides a minimum of 12.5 feet, usually 16.5 feet from the wetland edge of undisturbed vegetation and uncompacted soil, which slows and filters runoff from the surrounding property. Accordingly, the MCWD does not require any setback for structures from a delineated buffer as the buffer itself is the necessary and prudent protection for the wetland. As such, it would be completely logical if Orono were to also require no additional setback from a delineated buffer. Kinve commented he realizes that the prevailing attitude in Orono is that we need to be better than the established standards. Kinve stated personally he is not a fan of more for more sake but that the community should arrive at a common sense compromise that addresses many concerns that have been raised at the Planning Commission meeting and tonight. Kinve stated he would suggest that a principal structure be set back ten feet from an established buffer. An accessory structure, like a shed, patio, or a sport court, should be allowed two feet back from a required buffer provided that the structure could be constructed and/or maintained without interfering with the buffer. Kinve noted the recommended changes that he just went over are all above and beyond the current MCWD requirements. These changes address concerns about allowing enough room for homeowners to walk around their house or maintain any hard surface near their home without impacting the buffer. For setbacks with wetlands without a delineated buffer, Kinve stated he would suggest they maintain the 35 -foot setback. The benefit to maintaining the 35 -foot setback is that the City could encourage better environmental quality. Kinve stated they would be creating an incentive that does not exist today for a property owner to establish a buffer on their property to achieve more use of their property. If nothing is done, it will continue to allow someone to mow and spray chemicals all the way up to the edge of the pond and let that run off into the pond without any filter or any type of buffer. Kinve stated if someone wanted to build a deck, they could establish a buffer and control the runoff much better. Kinve stated he is requesting that the City not go to the greater/or standard. Kinve stated his recommendations is 10 feet for a principal building or structure; and if there is not have a buffer and there is a wetland, there should be a 35 -foot setback. If the person wants to come to the Planning Commission to reduce that setback, they can seek a variance but that they also have the option of establishing the buffer. Kinve stated in his view that would be fair to all existing homes and would allow people to more fully use their property. With respect to hardcover issues and runoff, Kinve noted they are not changing anything with respect to hardcover. The buffer in and of itself is going to slow down and prevent the type of pollution that people are looking to reduce or prevent. Page 25 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Kinve stated if a fire pit is built to code in the first place, it has to be surrounded by a certain measure of flat surface, and if the entirety of the fire pit structure is outside of the buffer, it will not impact the buffer. Kinve noted he would not have been allowed to build his sport court if he had to comply with the 35 -foot setback. Walsh asked if the City is getting rid of the 5 -year requirement on wetland delineations. Barnhart stated a question was raised at the Planning Commission meeting about how to treat those delineations. Under current regulations, a wetland delineation is good for five years and no changes are being proposed to that. The purpose for that is that wetlands tend to change over time. Walsh noted that is not a rule of the City and so therefore no changes can be made to it. Kinve stated the Watershed District for additions of accessory structures does not require a new wetland delineation. That would include a sport court, a patio or deck, a fire pit, or reconstruction of the house on the existing footprint. If there was a tear down and reconstruction of a different house, that property owner would need a new delineation to make sure the new house meets the same standards. Walsh stated he wanted to make sure that everyone was on the same page with that. Barnhart stated the five-year rule is not proposed to be changed. Kinve stated as long as someone is not rebuilding their entire home, the existing delineation is permanent to the property for purposes of smaller accessory structures and a new delineation is not required. Walsh asked if a new delineation would be required if Mr. Kinve would want to construct a deck ten years from now. Barnhart stated in that situation, Staff would use the best information they had, which would be a wetland delineation. Barnhart stated in Mr. Kinve's situation, if he were to tear down his house and build a bigger one and there is a declared buffer on the property, the Watershed District would use that buffer as the edge and a new wetland delineation would not be required. If there was no declared buffer, then a new wetland delineation would be required. Christopher Jones, 2320 Longview Circle, stated there does not seem to be a great need for this ordinance change and that when circumstances arise that might require adding a buffer and working from that, the variance process for that type of maneuver would be wonderful but that it can be take on a case-by-case basis rather than changing the entire ordinance so that it redoes everything. Jones stated there does not appear to be a great need for this change but that he does agree there are places where Orono can make a bigger difference by requiring buffers or doing things with variances. In the case of adding fire pits or hardscape, if the homeowner wants to have a variance granted, then the City is well within their right to allow that. Jones stated the current process allows some give and take through the variance process. Page 26 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Jones stated there is nothing that he can find on the City's website that there has been any detailed analysis of what is driving this change and what is causing it to be such a big issue. Jones stated if the City wants to address it on a case-by-case basis, that would be appropriate. Jones stated in reading through the proposal, he was kind of surprised when he read a statement on Lines 102 and 103 that states the four classifications for all properties except those zoned as residential. Jones stated he is unsure how that language actually applies to the issue that is before the Council tonight. Jones stated in his reading of the language, it appears to say that all of this is good and that the application of the management classes Preserve 1, 2, and 3 would apply going forward under this ordinance to everything that is not residential. Jones stated based on the language in the text amendment, it says except those zoned as residential, which would seem to suggest that houses are not going to be following this type of classification. Barnhart noted Lines 98 through 104 establishes the different types of wetland classifications except those zoned as residential. That language was added in there to reflect some changes recommended by the Watershed District. Barnhart noted wetlands are an overlay zone and are already governed by the Watershed District. Jones asked if it would apply to residential structures on properties or not. Barnhart stated based on the draft language, it would not since it is already governed by the Watershed District. Barnhart stated from that wetland designation, the Watershed District applies their buffers. Jones noted earlier this evening during the Eureka issue, Mayor Walsh stated the City does not want to give up control to the state, but yet here they are advocating giving up control to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Jones stated there is a contradiction there that he is struggling with. Walsh stated in his view they are a little different. Jones stated in his view philosophically they are not. Walsh stated they can agree to disagree on that. Jones asked if the 22 -foot setback would apply to Preserve Management Class 1, 2 and 3 or whether they would be treated differently. Barnhart stated originally the Planning Commission reviewed a version of the ordinance that had a different setback in it. Under Line 90, it says where no formal buffer exists and where the MCWD does not require a buffer, the City would require 35 feet. The Planning Commission saw a version that had the setback reduced to 22 feet. That number came from adding 12 feet to the MCWD's 12.5 feet. Barnhart noted wetland averaging would require a wetland delineation. Jones asked if the 22 feet would apply to all four management classes. Barnhart noted that is not before the City Council tonight. Page 27 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Walsh stated that number was for discussion at the Planning Commission but is not contained within the proposed ordinance. Jones encouraged the City Council to look at this issue carefully and to consider some of the unintended consequences that might arise if the setbacks are changed. Jones stated the variance process would allow the City to make case-by-case decisions rather than having a broad, sweeping change of the ordinance. Walsh stated he is glad to see all the participation by the residents on this issue. Walsh noted the variance process is not a give and take and it requires the property owner to prove a hardship. Jamie Lowe, 105 Orono Orchard Road, stated he agrees with the previous speaker's comments and that it seems like this is being fast forwarded somewhat since it is early in the year and this was listed as five or six on the Council's priority list. Walsh stated the Council has probably gone through I through 10 already and that they are working their way through the top 20 prioritized items. Overall the Council identified 60 total priorities. Walsh stated the City is conducting a review of their ordinances to see what is relevant and what is not. Walsh indicated this issue was brought up because there was a desire to revisit the delineation issue and setbacks since it was causing some delays and other issues. Walsh stated the discussion allows ideas to come about on how to deal with things. Lowe asked how people were selected for the Code Review Committee. Walsh indicated it is composed of people who expressed an interest in it and that the City will take anyone who expressed an interest in being on the committee. Lowe asked if there is a requirement to reside in the City to serve on a committee. Walsh stated he is not aware of any hard and fast rule to that effect and to his knowledge the members on the committee reside in Orono. Walsh stated there are some people on the Big Island committee that are not Orono residents since it is more of a regional asset. Lowe stated the vigorous, onerous processes that are in place are things that the residents have lived and abided by and help to make Orono a special city. Lowe commented he does not want to be governed by a body that does not have a direct interest in the City and that he would challenge the Council to leave the regulations as is. Printup stated he has heard a number of rumors as well and that he heard tonight that this change could result in higher density, which he is not in favor of. Printup stated in his view debating a 10 -foot wetland buffer will not impact density. Lowe stated he had heard that some members of that committee were not Orono residents and that in his view it would not be fair to have outside residents dictating Orono policy. Dankey commented that is not the case. Page 28 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Al Winston, Long Lake, stated he and his wife support the current regulations. Kelly Lowe, 105 Orono Orchard Road, stated she supports the 3 5 and I 0 -foot setbacks. Lowe stated she also supports keeping the density as is and not increasing it. Jane Davidson, 1020 Old Long Lake Road, Long Lake, stated she has resided in this area for four years and that she is very impressed with Orono's strong environmental push with regulations. Davidson stated this is a bad time to be considering changing environmental protections since there is growing pressure for land use in the western suburbs and that those residents who live on Long Lake are witnessing the water quality decrease. Davidson noted it takes decades to remediate the damage at a very high cost and that everyone needs to be very cautious in changing the rules. Davidson stated reducing the setbacks would have huge impacts on the water quality and that it would relax the City's commitment to the environment. Davidson encouraged the City Council to stick with Option 1. Davidson stated variances work pretty well and gives the neighborhood an opportunity to speak. Davidson stated she applauds Orono for their leadership. Davidson commented there are also different types of fire pits and that she was allowed to have a fire pit by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District since it only consists of six stones in a circle. Crosby noted there is a standard size fire pit. Jay Kinve noted variances are not easy to get and are not always based on common sense. Kinve noted this regulation is four years old and that the residents have not lived under this regulation their entire lives. Gaffron stated the regulations have changed many times over the years but four years ago it was changed again to what it is currently. Up until four years ago, the City had a buffer requirement but the Council decided to let the MCWD regulate the buffers and the City would only establish a setback. Going back to 1975, the City had a 26 -foot setback that was in place for two or three decades. Kinve stated approximately 2006 was the next major revision to the wetland ordinances. Kinve stated changing ordinances is not new and that there are no studies that show what was done four years ago was good or bad. Kinve noted the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is the environmental authority in this area and they are the experts. Kinve stated the MCWD's concern regionally is the same as Orono's and that Orono needs to think regionally as well since water flows elsewhere. Kinve stated the MCWD provides protections for Orono as well as other nearby cities and that they are the experts. Kinve stated if the City wants to impose additional setbacks, that is okay, but that variances are not that easy to obtain. Kinve stated he would implore the City Council to adopt something that is protective and incentivizes property owners to make things better than what exists today. Page 29 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Samantha Muldoon, 1801 West Farm Road, stated her understanding is that there is scientific support and data that shows a 35 -foot buffer setback is actually inadequate to protect water quality. The article from the US Fish and Wildlife Services says at 30 feet the sediment removal is minimal and at 50 feet you can maintain stream temperature, which is important for aquatic habitat enhancement and minimal nitrogen and contaminant removal. The US Fish and Wildlife Service article also said choosing a buffer width depends on the planning goals of the area. As the buffer increases, it provides greater benefits, and a 30 -foot buffer provides minimal service. At 50 feet, the buffer meets minimum water quality protection recommendations and gives some aquatic habitats benefit. For effective water quality and aquatic protection, a buffer width of 100 feet is needed. Muldoon stated there is data available. Muldoon noted it is different at every lake and it is very complicated, but they know a larger setback is better. Muldoon stated the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District really provides a baseline that is regional in focus and it applies to a number of cities, such as Edina and Eden Prairie. Muldoon stated Orono is not at all like those cities and that Orono is more rural. Muldoon stated traditionally all of the cities have applied their own standards on top of the MCWD's minimum common denominator and that she does not want the City Council to believe there is no data available or that the MCWD is the overarching expert on water quality. Muldoon stated she is in support of keeping the standards the way they are currently and that she is also in favor of the desktop wetland delineation. Walsh stated he appreciates the US Fish & Wildlife Service, but his understanding is that the data is taken from a number of different lakes and streams and not just wetlands and that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has a narrower focus. Walsh stated in his view they are talking about apples and pears when the two are compared. Muldoon stated the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District also published an article that talks about minimum setbacks. That study talks about for sediment reduction from steep slopes or shallow slopes, all of the setbacks are over 50 feet in terms of minimal distance. Muldoon stated in her view they should not mess with what has been working. Kinve noted he is also speaking for some other residents who were not able to attend tonight's meeting. Kinve stated with regard to the Long Lake Water Association's email that went out, the data that says a bigger setback is better is from the Panama City Field Office in Panama City, Florida, and relates to how to protect large bodies of water and the salamander, which is not the situation here and is not applicable to this area. Kinve stated the other people that he has talked to also made the point that people are spreading information around that is not applicable to this region. Kinve noted they are talking about buffers again and not setbacks. Paul Muldoon noted earlier this evening he did recognize some comments that did have merit from Mr. Kinve, and one of them was how do you look at situations where someone has an encroachment and that person wants to do something in their yard, and if they do something else to mitigate what otherwise could be a detriment, they can earn the right to do it. Muldoon stated that type of thing is hard to Page 30 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued incorporate into an ordinance because variances do not allow for that. Muldoon stated maybe allowances should be given for those types of situations. Muldoon stated he is concerned about the water quality and that there might be a solution here, which may be mitigation. Kinve stated he was proposing creating an incentive where a person actually creates a buffer. Kinve noted the information that was sent around talks about a buffer, which does not create an incentive to have a buffer. Kinve stated he would leave the regulations unchanged except for allowing accessory structures up to 10 feet from the wetland buffer. If there is no buffer, they have to be 35 feet back from the wetland. Kinve stated it is the buffer that filters the water, slows down the runoff, and absorbs chemicals and nitrates. Kinve stated the City could be a lot more lenient on variances but then there will probably be a bunch of variance requests. Muldoon commented the water quality needs to be preserved, and if the setbacks are cropped to the shortest level, there will be more creep. Muldoon stated it will be easier to go down than it is to come back up. Laurie Goodsell, 2206 Watertown Road, stated she is very much in support of not changing the setback and that little by little things are being chipped away. Goodsell stated she moved here for the rural character. Goodsell stated she is not a water expert but she knows the water quality in this area is terrible and that it needs to be protected more, not less. Cassie Ordway, 1145 County Road 6, stated she would like the City Council to totally understand the ramifications of the ordinance so there is a reasonable, thoughtful discussion on how homeowners should use their land. Ordway commented perhaps a compromise could be reached that way. Ordway stated if the City Council wants to look at data, they can go back to 2001 when the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District did an extensive study looking at 50 to I 00 -foot buffers from 2001 to 2007. At some point a number close to 35 feet was implemented. Ordway stated less than 15 years ago, the buffers and setbacks used to much greater than what they are now. Ordway encouraged the City Council to be very thoughtful about this and that perhaps they should table it given the lateness of the evening. Ordway stated she would also encourage Staff to look at other options that might provide a compromise while still preserving the wetlands and the water quality. Ordway noted wetlands ebb and flow and that if people are allowed to do things too close to the wetlands, they will eventually want to pump the water out of that area. There were no further public comments. Printup commented he is surprised there has not been a bigger push to make larger buffers around Long Lake given the water quality, but that he has a hard time connecting a small accessory structure or a fire pit with really creating bad water quality. Printup stated he does not know how close a fire pit should go to a buffer, but at the same time there are a number of residents that are going around their lawn with Page 31 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued Round -Up and dandelion deterrent. Printup stated sometimes they go off topic and get emotional but that he is having a hard time making the connection. Dankey indicated she does not agree with Council Member Printup and that if you allow people to go closer to the buffer, there will be creep because that is the way people are. Dankey stated she is fine with the setback the way it is. Printup indicated he is okay with the desktop wetland delineation. Dankey stated some of the delineation maps seem a little extreme and that she is not sure how accurate they are. Crosby stated he would like to see that more defined and that the Council could consider allowing things that will not interfere with the wetland. Walsh stated the Council could also leave things as is and simply allow fire pits within the setback. Barnhart noted a recreational fire is 3 x 3 x 3 and a fire pit can be any size. Seals stated she is undecided about the data that was submitted and whether the setback should be changed at this time. Seals stated in her view the City can do better than Option I or Option 2 but that in her view people will creep closer to the wetland if the setbacks are reduced. Seals stated she would like to keep everything the same until the Council looks at it further. Seals stated in her view a larger setback will not solve all the problems that Long Lake is having since there are other factors that need to be addressed. Seals noted the Planning Commission said they don't have enough information and she also does not feel she has enough information. Seals suggested the Council invite the Watershed District to one of the Council's work sessions to talk about why the buffers are the way they are and what the impacts are. Seals stated she would like to have a larger discussion about what can be done to improve the water quality of the various lakes. Crosby stated he would also like somebody from the Watershed District to speak with the Council and that perhaps the City can be a little flexible by allowing fire pits within the setback. Dankey commented it unfortunately is too late to make the setbacks and buffers better since the homes are already there and that a 1 00 -foot buffer is never going to happen. Walsh stated it appears the City Council is in favor of the desktop wetland delineation and to send this back to Planning Commission to look at setbacks, possible flexibility for some items within the setback, and to obtain additional information from the Watershed District before a final decision is made. Seals moved, Printup seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series, an Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Pertaining to Wetland Regulations, Option 1. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 32 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. *17. AUTHORIZE TO HIRE CITY PLANNER Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to authorize the hiring of Laura (Holey) Oakden to the position of City Planner at Grade 11, Step 2. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Printup reported there was a Highway 12 Safety Coalition meeting last Thursday, with the coalition being updated on some of the issues taking place at the MN State Legislature. In 2021 there will be some money available for some improvements. Printup stated he also received some feedback from when the LMCD representative was before the Council and that the residents liked the Council's questions. Crosby encouraged the local residents to support the businesses on Highway 12 during the road improvement project. Walsh reported he attended the May Park Commission meeting, which went well, and that he would like to thank the Orono Thunder for spreading mulch on the trails at Lurton Park. Walsh stated he would also encourage the residents to continue visiting the businesses in Long lake and Orono during the construction. Walsh noted the new daycare place, Little Acorns, experienced flooding two days after they moved into the building, which closed down their business for a week. Walsh reported they also had the Mayor Step-To-lt-Challenge, with 15 to 20 people participating in the walk. Walsh stated he also has held a number of meetings with citizens and Hennepin County regarding some issues associated with the Highway 112 construction. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Reeder stated he has nothing to report. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Mattick stated he has nothing to repot Page 33 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ADJOURNMENT Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 11:11 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 34 of 34 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 3 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Danielle Amira Agenda Consent Agenda Accountant Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 107434 to 107516, totaling $317,328.42. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment # 107434 Wacoma Ford $112,492.00 Payment for four new squads, Police Department. #107503 T W Tupy hic $ 6,002.83 Payment for rock & sand for park parking lots, sewer digs & street repairs # 1075 10 Visu Sewer Clean & Seal Inc. $ 29,598.80 Payment for sewer televising for 2016 maintenance 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Prepared By: Oaa Reviewed By: J9aa Approved By: DR City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Invoice GIL Account Number ADVANCED FIRSTAID INC 05/22/2017 107436 0317-55 101-42110-240 Total 107436 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05122/2017 107437 INV132967 101-42110-413 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05/22/2017 107437 INV133479 101-41900-221 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05/22/2017 107437 INV133609 602-49450-401 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05/22/2017 107437 INV133609 101-41900-401 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 05122/2017 107437 INV133609 101-42110-401 Total 107437: AMIR &ASHLEY MEHBOD 05/22/2017 107438 17-3919 101-22205 Total 107438: BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633063 101-45200-415 BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633064 101-45200-415 BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633065 101-45200-415 BIFFS INC 05122/2017 107439 W633066 101-45210-415 BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633067 101-45200-415 BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633068 101-45200-415 BIFFS INC 05/22/2017 107439 W633069 101-45200-415 Total 107439 BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. BOLTON & MENK INC. Description Department Invoice Amount AED recharge Police Department 488.87 488.87 Toner Police Department 15.67 Toner Central Services 14.04 Printers -05/10/17-06/09/17 Sewer 56.77 Printers -05/10/17-06/09/17 Central Services 113.55 Printers -05/10/17-06/09/17 Police Department 113.55 Hand soap, ADA Restroom Rental Service Parks 313.58 Escrow Refund -#17-3919 2625 North Shore Drive Parks 2,500.00 2,500.00 Hand soap, ADA Restroom Rental Service Parks 120.00 Hand soap, ADA Restroom Rental Service Parks 120.00 Hand soap, ADA Restroom Rental Service Parks 93.75 Hand soap, Restroom Rental Service Golf Course 47.10 Hand soap, Restroom Rental Service Parks 46.88 Hand soap, ADA Restroom Rental Service Parks 120.00 Hand soap, Restroom Rental Service Parks 46.88 ..A �4 05/22/2017 107440 0202796 602-16500 2016 Sewer Improvements 64.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202797 101-43280-304 701 Dickey Lane Special Services 78.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202798 101-43280-304 17-3939-2807 Casco Point Rd Special Services 312.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202799 101-43280-304 15-3739 Mooney Lake Special Services 55.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202800 601-49400-304 GIS Mapping Water 128.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202800 101-43170-304 GIS Mapping Engineering 699.00 05122/2017 107440 0202800 101-43170-304 GIS Mapping Office Hrs Engineering 96.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202802 101-43170-304 General Eng 03/2017 Engineering 756.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202803 651-49910-304 Pond Assessments Storm Water 420.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202804 435-48966-304 2017 Street Improvements 390.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202805 101-43170-304 Willow Trail Engineering 1,306.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202806 101-43280-304 15-3749/16-3858 Crystal Bay Estates Special Services 505.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202807 402-48057-304 Fox Street Fox Street 8,955.00 05/22/2017 107440 0202808 101-43280-304 15-3723 Lakeview Special Services 55.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount BOLTON & MENK INC. 05/22/2017 107440 0202809 651-49910-304 2016 Pond Assessments Storm Water 216.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 05/22/2017 107440 0202810 101-43280-304 16-3807 Orono Preserve Special Services 5,006.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 05/22/2017 107440 0202811 101-43280-304 16-3847 Shadywood Villas Special Services 1,288.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 05/22/2017 107440 0202812 101-43280-304 16-1980 1700 Shoreline Drive Special Services 55.00 BOLTON & MENK INC. 05122/2017 107440 0202813 402-48056-304 Watertown Road Phase 11 Watertown Road 220.00 Total 107440: 20,604.00 BUDGET PRINTING 05122/2017 107441 4490 601-49400-322 UPS package Sent Water 12.46 Total 107441: 12.46 C&C Embroidery 05/22/2017 107442 2007 601-49400-226 PPE -Public Works -Becky Water 38.00 C&C Embroidery 05/22/2017 107442 2007 602-49450-226 PPE -Public Works -Becky Sewer 38.00 Total 107442: 76.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-OOOG-1 101-41600-307 General Legal Review -04/2017 Law/Legal Services 3,095.02 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-OOOG-1 101-41600-307 Data Practices -04/2017 Law/Legal Services 852.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05122/2017 107443 2717004G-1 101-42110-307 Police Matter -04/2017 Police Department 837.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-115G-8 101-41600-308 Code Enforcement -04/2017 Law/Legal Services 170.50 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-201 G-5 101-41600-307 Misc Record i ngs-04/17 Law/Legal Services 1,075.48 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-44IG-5 101-41600-307 Azad Land Reg-Bederwood Rd Law/Legal Services 46.50 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-471G-4 101-41600-307 Nygard Nuisance Law/Legal Services 839.30 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-472G-5 601-49400-307 Chlorine Release Matter Water 46.50 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-473G-4 101-41600-307 Johnson/Feldsnon Matter Law/Legal Services 523.92 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-486G-1 101-43280-307 17-3907-2500 Shadywood Special Services 75.00 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-487G-1 101-43280-307 17-3908-3320 Navarre Ln Special Services 75.00 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-488G-1 101-43280-307 17-3909-2755 Ethel Ave Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-489G-1 101-43280-307 17-3912-1298 Wildhurst TrI Special Services 75.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-49OG-1 101-43280-307 17-3914- 4116 Highwood Rd Special Services 75.00 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-491G-1 101-43280-307 17-3915-1920 Fagerness Pt Rd Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05122/2017 107443 2717-492G-1 101-43280-307 17-3916-1020 Tonkawa Rd Special Services 75.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-493G-1 101-43280-307 17-3919-2625 North Shore Drive Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-494G-1 101-43280-307 17-3917-4005 North Shore Drive Special Services 100.00 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-80OG-2 101-42400-307 Staff Mtgs-04/2017 Building & Zoning 790.50 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-801 G-2 101-41600-307 Council Mtgs-04/2017 Law/Legal Services 1,007.50 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-802G-2 101-42400-307 B&Z Assistance -04/2017 Building & Zoning 914.50 CAMPBELLKNUTSON 05/22/2017 107443 2717-803G-1 101-43280-307 Ordinances -04/117 Special Services 62.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 107443: 11,036.22 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 05/22/2017 107444 CF050717 101-42110-437 Water/snacks for Dept mtg/training Police Department 68.54 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 05122/2017 107444 CF050817 101-42110-352 Receipt, Inventory & Return Forms -MN County Atty Police Department 33.00 Total 107444: 101.54 CCP INDUSTRIES INC. 05122/2017 107445 IN01889655 601-49400-226 Latex Gloves, Eyewear Water 87.46 Total 107445: 87.46 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 05/22/2017 107446 0046956 101-43000-403 O -Rings, Chrome Shaft, Wiper Seal Public Works Department 280.38 Total 107446: 280.38 CENTURY LINK 05/22/2017 107447 447 APRIL 2 101-45210-321 GC phone 4/1-5/10 2017 Golf Course 304.53 Total 107447: 304.53 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/22/2017 107448 0014739 101-42110-402 #240 oil,filterfront brake pads replacement, Police Department 936.06 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/22/2017 107448 0014752 101-42110-402 #231 Test battery and recharge a/c system Police Department 149.36 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/22/2017 107448 0014763 101-42110-402 #223 -A/C repair, recharge system, oil change, filter Police Department 627.31 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 05/22/2017 107448 0014767 101-42110-402 #244 -Replace Right rear tire, test tire, Police Department 45.96 Total 107448: 1,758.69 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 05/22/2017 107449 170430 101-43000-224 blacktop for patching Public Works Department 1,355.46 Total 107449: 1,355.46 DELTA DENTAL 05/22/2017 107450 6909218 101-21709 003722072- June/2017- Dental 2,270.00 DELTA DENTAL 05/22/2017 107450 6909218 101-15998 003722072- June/2017- Dental 1,002.50 Total 107450: 3,272.50 DOMINOS PIZZA 05/22/2017 107451 5025 101-42110-439 food for PID training Police Department 121.89 Total 107451: 121.89 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount EARL F ANDERSON &ASSOC 05/22/2017 107452 0114117 -IN 101-43000-224 Dist 4, Trails, Stock Public Works Department 1,289.50 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 05/22/2017 107452 0114237 -IN 101-43000-224 sign for Brush Site on McCully Public Works Department 304.40 Total 107452: 1,593.90 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 05/22/2017 107453 487244 602-49450-352 2016 Drinking Water Report Sewer 518.52 Total 107453: 518.52 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRAINI 05/22/2017 107454 1664 101-43000-437 CPR Class Public Works Department 320.00 Total 107454: 320.00 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 05/22/2017 107455 XX1874 602-49450-406 ADJ Ring Sewer 680.00 Total 107455: 680.00 FRED VARGAS 05/22/2017 107456 FV042417 101-42110-437 reimb meals for Field Training OfficerO4/24-04/26/20 Police Department 40.75 Total 107456: 40.75 G & K SERVICES 05122/2017 107457 6006484674 101-41900-404 mats Central Services 10.80 G & K SERVICES 05/22/2017 107457 6006484675 101-41900-404 mats Central Services 21.92 Total 107457: 32.72 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 358108 101-43000-402 #431 Transmission Air filter Public Works Department 148.49 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 3582222 601-49400-402 #712 -Air filter, oil filter Water 11.48 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 3582222 602-49450-402 #712 -Air filter, oil filter Sewer 11.47 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 358735 101-45210-402 Air Filter, Oil Filter, Mirror #610 Golf Course 35.42 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 358745 101-45210-402 Oil Drain Plug Gasket -#610 Golf Course 1.98 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 359490 101-42110-402 Squad Headlight Bulbs Police Department 64.95 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 359733 101-45200-402 HeadLight Parks 10.99 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/09/2017 107374 359738 101-45200-402 Halogen Lamp #210 Parks 10.99 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05109/2017 107374 477737 101-43000-240 Shop Supplies Public Works Department 105.90 - Total 107374: 401.67 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 358108 101-43000-402 #431 Transmission Air filter Public Works Department 148.49 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 358222 601-49400-402 Air Filter, Oil Filter, Mirror #610 Water 11.48 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 358222 602-49450-402 Air Filter, Oil Filter Sewer 11.47 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 358735 101-45210-402 #610 Oil and air filter Golf Course 35.42 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 358745 101-45210-402 #610 Oil Drain Plug Gasket Golf Course 1.98 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 359490 101-42110-402 Squad Headlight Bulbs Police Department 64.95 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05122/2017 107458 359733 101-45200-402 Truck #21 0 -Headlight Parks 10.99 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 359738 101-45200-402 #210 Headlight Parks 10.99 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 361507 101-43000-403 Oil Filter#460 Sweeper Public Works Department 17.73 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 05/22/2017 107458 361804 101-43000-402 Connector -Trailer Light Public Works Department 4.48 Total 107458: 317.98 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASS 05/22/2017 107459 0139995-17 101-41500-433 2017 membership R. Olson Finance Department 170.00 Total 107459: 170.00 GRAINGER INC 05/22/2017 107460 9403368849 101-45210-403 Air Compressor Golf Course 192.28 Total 107460: 192.28 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA 0512212017 107461 3602203622 101-45210-092 beverages for concessions Golf Course 249.60 Total 107461: 249.60 HEALTH PARTNERS 05/22/2017 107462 72924648 101-21706 June/2017-HP HRA 37,923.00 HEALTH PARTNERS 05/22/2017 107462 72924648 101-15998 June/2017-HP Ins 5,235.00 HEALTH PARTNERS 05/22/2017 107462 72924648 101-42110-135 June/2017-HP Ins Police Department 591.50 Total 107462: 43,749.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/22/2017 107463 1000009342 101-43000-414 radio Comm u nication-04/2017 Public Works Department 95.30 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 05/22/2017 107463 1000093572 101-41900-319 netwrok Support 5/2017 Central Services 51.00 Total 107463: 146.30 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 05122/2017 107464 1000091216 101-41600-309 jail charges-Feb/2017 Law/Legal Services 203.11 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 05/22/2017 107464 1000093348 101-41600-309 jail charges-April/2017 Law/Legal Services 1,185.63 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 05/22/2017 107464 1000093396 101-42110-414 Radio Fees-April/2017 Police Department 2,068.64 Total 107464: 3.457.38 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number HYDRO KLEAN 05/22/2017 107465 57587 101-43000-240 Metal Locator Public Works Department Total 107465: JERRYTIMPE 05122/2017 107466 05132017 101-41900-404 ragation Repairs Central Services Total 107466: JJ TAYLOR DIST LF MN JJ TAYL 05122/2017 107467 2655615 101-45210-091 beer for resale -GC Golf Course Total 107467: JOSEPH & LAURA MCCURDY 05/22/2017 107468 2014-00410 101-22205 Escrow Refund -#2014-00410-2327 Olive AVe Total 107468: JR S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 05/22/2017 107469 92192 101-43270-442 City Clean up -2017 Recycling Pick-up Program Total 107469: KRAHL'S PLUMBING 05/22/2017 107470 102 101-41900-403 Remove Old drinking Fountain -install Replacement Central Services KRAHL'S PLUMBING 05/22/2017 107470 103 101-41900-404 Remove & replace breakroom faucet -Public Works Central Services Total 107470: KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 05/22/2017 107471 540711 101-42110-403 Radar repair Police Department Total 107471: LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 06/22/2017 107472 1297291-201 101-42110-311 May/1 7- contract fee Police Department Total 107472: LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43473 101-42110-401 Network J. Stickler Police Department LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43500 101-42110-310 Police Record -05/2017 Police Department LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43500 101-41900-329 Internet -05/2017 Central Services LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43500 101-42110-329 Internet -05/2017 Police Department LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43500 101-41900-319 Back -Ups -05/2017 Central Services LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43599 601-49400-221 SCADA Firewall Water LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43599 602-49450-221 SCADA Firewall Sewer Page: 6 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Invoice Amount 625.00 625.00 537.50 537.50 212.70 212.70 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,590.00 1,590.00 470.00 250.00 720.00 102.00 102.00 115.00 6,499.00 198.00 198.00 925.00 281.09 281.09 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43599 601-49400-221 CDW Credit-SCADA Firewall Water 32.33- LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43599 602-49450-221 CDW Credit-SCADA Firewall Sewer 32.34- LOGIS 05/22/2017 107473 43599 101-41900-319 LOGIS Admin Charge Central Services 12.44 Total 107473: 8,444.95 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B393163 101-45210-223 Screen for suction line Golf Course 54.96 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B393325 602-49450-489 Drinking Water on Job Site Sewer 9.98 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B393532 101-43000-224 Parts for Installing Speed Bumps Public Works Department 18.77 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B395115 101-45210-201 Trash bags, Rain Gauge, Bowl Cleaner, cleaning sp Golf Course 20.56 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B395309 101-43000-404 Hot Water Heater Fix Parts Public Works Department 1.49 LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107474 B395321 101-42110-221 Squad Bags Police Department 21.48 Total 107474: 127.24 LUBE TECH ESI 05/22/2017 107475 933975 101-43000-212 55 Gallons -Windshield Washer Fluid Public Works Department 152.40 Total 107475: 152.40 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05122/2017 107476 P06023 602-49450-402 Unit 713 repairs Sewer 67.87 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/22/2017 107476 P06090 101-43000-403 repair parts for Road Sweeper Public Works Department 195.47 Total 107476: 263.34 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/22/2017 107477 20269654 101-42110-212 Fuel Police Department 1,109.98 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/22/2017 107477 20269655 101-43000-212 Diesel Fuel Public Works Department 378.21 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/22/2017 107477 20269687 101-42110-212 Fuel Police Department 1,406.16 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/22/2017 107477 20284459 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel Police Department 3,067.58 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 05/22/2017 107477 20284460 101-43000-212 Diesel Public Works Department 298.32 Total 107477: 6,260.25 MHSRC/Range 05/22/2017 107478 629430-5733 101-42110-437 training W. Carstens Police Department 525.00 Total 107478: 525.00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 05/22/2017 107479 00008711 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 24.30 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 05/22/2017 107479 00008712 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 35.91 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 05/22/2017 107479 00008713 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 9.96 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 107479 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/22/2017 107480 L12215 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05122/2017 107480 P55556 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/22/2017 107480 P55556 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/22/2017 107480 P555767 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 05/22/2017 107480 P56116 Total 107480 Department Invoice Amount 101-45210-403 Repair Fairway Mower Golf Course 673.94 101-43000-224 Gal Summer B&C Soil Public Works Department 15.75 101-43000-226 High Performance Display Public Works Department 67.74 101-43000-224 Replacement Chain Saw Chains Public Works Department 41.90 101-43000-403 Replacement Chainsaw Chains Public Works Department 154.23 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 05/22/2017 107481 4126-2017 601-49400-441 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 05/22/2017 107481 4915-2017 601-49400-441 Total 107481: MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-34210 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-34650 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 601-39610 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05122/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37910 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37920 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37930 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37940 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37960 MN DEPT OF REVENUE -WIRE 05/22/2017 107482 APRIL 2017 101-37970 Total 107482: MOUND TRUE VALUE 05/22/2017 107483 143625 MOUND TRUE VALUE 06/22/2017 107483 143664 Total 107483: Water Supply System Operator Class D license R.O' Water Water Supply System Operator Class D license D.G Water April/1 7 --General Sales tax April/17-Police Reports Sales Tax Feb/1 7 -Water Meter Sales Tax April/17-GC Green Fees Sales Tax April/17-GC Rentals Sales Tax April/1 7 -GC Beer Sales Tax April/17-GC Concessions Sales Tax April/1 7 -GC -Golf Ball Sales Tax April/I 7 -GC -Pro Shop Sales Tax 101-42110-402 Coating, Waterless Wipes, cleaning wipes, Cable tie Police Department 101-42110-201 Screws/Nuts/Bolts/Washer Police Department MT1 DIST CO 05/22/2017 107484 1109139-00 101-45210-404 Ball Washer -GC MTI DIST CO 05/22/2017 107484 111421000 101-45210-403 Start Up Irrigation Total 107484: MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATI 05/22/2017 107485 00285658 101-41900-352 code updates Golf Course Golf Course Central Services 23.00 46.00 1.00 5.00 22.00 1,449.00 156.00 24.00 51.00 11.00 I __ 1,721.00 50.44 8.20 58.64 187.73 345.00 532.73 1,482.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 107485: NATHAN BRANDENBURG 05122/2017 107486 17-3927 101-22205 Escrow Refund -#1 7-3927-825 Forest Arms Lane Total 107486: NAVARRE HARDWARE 05/22/2017 107487 301786 101-45210-201 Batteries for Golf Course Telephone Golf Course Total 107487: NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300282868 101-42400-221 Tablets -Planning Commission Building & Zoning NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300283094 101-41900-221 Tablets -Council Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300293566 101-41900-221 Tablet Power Adapters -Council Chambers Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300294311 101-41900-221 Tablet -Council Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300295458 101-41900-201 Power Strips -Council Chambers Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300295474 101-41900-201 Power Strips -Council Chambers Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300295861 101-41900-201 Velcro -Power Strips -Council Chambers Central Services NEWEGG INC 05/22/2017 107488 1300299164 101-41900-221 Dell Laptop Adapters Central Services NEWEGG INC 05122/2017 107488 1300304241 101-45210-240 Cordless Phone -Golf Course Golf Course Total 107488: NORLINGS 05/22/2017 107489 32619 101-41900-404 City Hall landscape maintenance Central Services Total 107489: NORTH MEMORIAL 05/22/2017 107490 P-WJHNZ-35 101-42110-437 EMIR Refresher-Cartens, Strum, Barnes, Fourinmer, Police Department Total 107490: 0 SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 05/22/2017 107491 APRIL 2017 101-42110-402 car washes Police Department Total 107491: OFFICE DEPOT 05/22/2017 107492 9240234140 101-41900-201 Calculator, Clip, Expanding Folders, Bowls' Central Services OFFICE DEPOT 05/22/2017 107492 9240234960 101-41900-201 Ziplock bags, Water Central Services OFFICE DEPOT 05/22/2017 107492 9255485970 101-42110-201 Paper, Pen, Jacket, Tissue Police Department OFFICE DEPOT 05/22/2017 107492 92554871100 101-42110-201 Notepads Police Department Page: 9 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Invoice A—- 1,482.00 700.00 700.00 10.99 10.99 1,999.95 139.93 349.00 20.36 24.78 49.49 49.98 109.99 13.08 113.80 27.48 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 107492: PIRTEK 05/22/2017 107493 S2480040.00 602-49450-403 repair jetter hose Sewer Total 107493: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 05/22/2017 107494 6023 101-45200-404 French Creek Park Vegetation mgmt Parks PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 05/22/2017 107494 6049 234-45680-404 Lurton Park Vegetation Mgmt Total 107494: QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 05/22/2017 107495 33497 602-49450-406 LS#7 Repairs Sewer Total 107495: R.D. & Associates Specialized Ser 05/22/2017 107496 103159 101-43000-408 Tree Removal Casco Point Rd, Trimmed Tree Lyric Public Works Department Total 107496: REED WHOLESAILE/OFFICE CO 05/22/2017 107497 9366 101-45210-093 concessions Resale Golf Course Total 107497: RICHARD GILL 05/22/2017 107498 1-720020-00 999-10015 Refund -Over Pmty UB Acct#1 -720020-00 Total 107498: ROBERT HAAPALA 05/22/2017 107499 2017-00311 101-22205 Escrow Refund -#2017-00311-4015 Dahl Rd Total 107499: SAFETY VEHICLE SOLUTIONS 05122/2017 107500 1694 101-43000-402 Emergency Light Replacement Unit 427 Public Works Department SAFETY VEHICLE SOLUTIONS 05/22/2017 107500 1695 101-43000-402 Emergency Ligth Replacement Unit 427 Public Works Department Total 107500: SIMPLEX GRINNELL 05/22/2017 107501 83665189 101-42110-404 PD Dry Sprinkler System Police Department Page: 10 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Invoice A-- 204.65 138.50 138.50 360.00 857.50 2,755.00 181.20 181.20 3.84 3.84 700.00 700.00 728.00 220.00 948.00 1,040.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 11 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 107501: 1,040.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11256555 101-42110-226 Radio Holder, battery-Wocken Police Department 81.97 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05122/2017 107502 11257839 101-42110-226 Buckle, Key holder -Kirschner Police Department 24.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11257866 101-42110-226 Buckle -Kirschner Police Department 5.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11258641 101-42110-226 Shirt, Embroidery, Boots -B. Persell Police Department 50.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11259323 101-42110-580 Rifles Police Department 5,094.00 STREICHERS; POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11259355 101-42110-226 Ball vest, Uniform Shirt, Trauma Plate, Name Tag Cl Police Department 128.49 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 05/22/2017 107502 11259600 101-42110-226 Boots -B. Persell Police Department 99.99 Total 107502: 5,486.41 T W TUPY INC 05/22/2017 107503 120617 101-43000-224 Rock & Sand -park parking lots, sewer digs, and stre Public Works Department 2,000.94 T W TUPY INC 05/22/2017 107503 120617 602-49450-223 Rock & Sand -park parking lots, sewer digs, and stre Sewer 2,000.94 T W TUPY INC 05/22/2017 107503 120617 101-45200-223 Rock & Sand -park parking lots, sewer digs, and stre Parks 2,000.95 Total 107503: 6,002.83 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL 0512212017 107504 INVO000593 602-49450-406 spray for shorelines Sewer 1,471.50 Total 107504: 1,471.50 TESSMAN COMPANY 05/2212017 107505 S249489 -IN 101-45210-223 CrabGrass Control Golf Course 178.08 Total 107505: 178.08 THN ENTERPRISES 05/22/2017 107506 1853 101-45200-404 Big Island dock Transport Parks 4,500.00 Total 107506: 4,500.00 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 05/22/2017 107507 40064122 101-43000-415 cylinder & Demurrage Public Works Department 10.68 Total 107507: 10.68 TONY WITTKE 05/22/2017 107508 YW042417 101-42110-437 Meal -ETI Conf-St. Cloud Police Department 15.99 Total 107508: 15.99 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/22/2017 107509 9785215051 101-42110-321 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 Police Department 1,582.49 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Sewer 70.02 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/22/2017 107509 9785215051 101-41900-321 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/22/2017 107509 9785215051 101-45210-321 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/22/2017 107509 9785215051 601-49400-321 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/22/2017 107509 9785215051 602-49450-321 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 VERIZON WIRELESS 05122/2017 107509 9785215051 101-43000-415 Cell Phones -04/07/17-05/06/17 Total 107509: VISU SEWER CLEAN & SEAL IN 05/22/2017 107510 28450 602-49450-406 sewer televisia for 2016 Maint VISU SEWER CLEAN & SEAL IN 05/22/2017 107510 28519 602-49450-406 Televising Sewer for 2016 Maint Total 107510: WACONIAFORD 05/09/2017 107434 33833 101-42110-550 4 Squads -PD Total 107434: WACONIAFORD 05/22/2017 107511 FOCA111775 101-42110-402 #232 Radio Errors Total 107511: WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 05122/2017 107512 0027436-280 603-49500-316 May/17-Recycling WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 05/22/2017 107512 0027436-280 603-39610 April/17-RMO Total 107512: WATERTOWN ALL AROUND PA 05/22/2017 107513 477737 101-43000-240 Shop Supplies WATERTOWN ALL AROUND PA 05/22/2017 107513 478130 101-43000-402 Flasher -Emergency Lights-Truck#429 WATERTOWN ALL AROUND PA 05/22/2017 107513 478292 101-43000-240 Air Tank -Shop Total 107513: WILLIAMS TOWING 05/22/2017 107514 144233 231-45650-436 tow-case-#OR17005208 Total 107514: WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 05/22/2017 107515 3502558167 602-49450-381 Electrical Svc -04/01/17-05/01/17 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 05/22/2017 107515 3502558167 101-43000-386 Electrical Svc -04101/17-05/01/17 Department Invoice Sewer Amount Central Services 1.68 - Golf Course 71.28 Water 70.02 Sewer 70.02 Public Works Department 35.01 Sewer 20,313.37 Sewer 9,285.43 29,598.80 Police Department 112,492.00 112,492.00 Police Department 578.20 8,972.62 7,589.32 Public Works Department 105.90 Public Works Department 29.99 Public Works Department 74.99 210.88 Sewer 32.00 Public Works Department 136.10 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 13 Check Issue Dates: 5/9/2017 - 5/22/2017 May 18, 2017 02:OOPM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 107515: 168.10 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-41900-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Central Services 1,686.66 XCELENERGY 05122/2017 107516 544709333 101-42110-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Police Department 1,183.23 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-42110-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Police Department 33.77 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-43000-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Public Works Department 139.09 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-43000-386 Electdc-03/20/17-04/23/17 Public Works Department 1,036.51 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-45200-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Parks 35.25 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 601-49400-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Water 4,604.82 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 602-49450-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Sewer 2,612.62 XCELENERGY 05/22/2017 107516 544709333 101-45210-381 Electric -03/20/17-04/23/17 Golf Course 167.33 Total 107516: 11,499.28 Grand Totals: 317,328.42 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 4 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Licenses — Garbage Haulers Presenter: Rachel Dodge, Agenda Consent Agenda Administrative Assistant Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the below listed garbage & refuse collector licenses. 2. Background. The garbage & refuse collector license applicants have met the requirements and have all submitted complete applications. A notice of spring road restrictions was provided to each hauler. 3. List of Garbage & Refuse Collector Licenses to be Approved a. Baldy Sanitation Inc. 5906 Henry Street Maple Plain, MN 55359 b. Empty Can Sanitation 7300 Co. Rd. 76 Maple Plain, NIN 55359 c. Randy's Environmental Services 4351 US Hwy 12 SE Delano, NIN 55328 d. Veit Disposal Systems 14000 Veit Place Rogers, NN 55374 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff is recommending approval of the above listed licenses based on the applicants meeting the licensing requirements and having a history of compliance with no complaints in recent years. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to approve the above listed licenses. Exhibit A. Garbage & refuse collector License applications. Prepared By: Rachel Dodge Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: Nz Licenses - Exhibit A City of Orono 11cerseYear-2017-2018 '01WIV I t" Box 66 (2750 Kelley Padmay) DateReceiv4 &--j Xll_.'�� Crystal Day, XN M23 Fee, Paid 4v Initials .4 (952) 249 -,MO N Garbage & Refuse Collector's License Application The und signed wishes to opmte the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith M8keS4appliC4ttj0nS for a license to do so. Address '4 4�7 15 ...... . .. .... )VA -P &I' ­'� � & . ,5 -- Business Phone Number (SAet) (City) (State) (Zip C`Ode) -2k3- 17 f- PT 3 S' Check One: El Individual ElPartnership OCorporation Check All That Apply In Orono: 0 Residential ElConnnemial EIRoll-Off Applicant's Name Address S'.906 Phone Number 12h 9- a -F-3 _Z_ r --7- If 1: r I " 1 52 -101 (city) (state) (Zip code) NOTE: The City of Orono enforce& spring weight restrictions each year, Orono follows the State, typicany restrictions run fi-omMamh 110 -.May 151h each year. Fines wxH be given if veincles are over-axel hmits of 7 tons per axel. Enclosed is a copy of the Orono Resolution establishing seasonal weight restdctions on Orono pubho city sawts and a copy of our current year fee schedule jj esgMmon or -y eju tattam tist ii more) Number of velucles to be used in Orono Year Mfox. Gross wt Front A2Le Wt Rear Axle Wt SizeNards License Wu-m--ber ,pa -LL 1A1.r I- juwvo__ MQ"Q 4a*4t_ �L6 X 1'74"? General area of City served: Schedule of Collection charges/ dates: '!1;.4 Approximate number of mtstomers in Orono: /0 Location of dumping area: 4Cp o i?L,*A;t IN ORDER FOR THIS APPIACATION TO BE ]PROCESSED, YOU MUST ENCLOS-Z THE FOLLOWING: Application must be filled out in its entirety Surety bond in the amount of S 1,000 Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000 - $300,000 $50,000 and 10-daycanceUation clause Annual fee is a $75.00 flat rate fee, IDIUS $15.00 per Mick � and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable) I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all. license fees and taxes required by law. I have verified that the above fixrormation is correct Apphomt Signa Dite FOVCrrY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends: Approval ElDenial Eloffier specify) Signature of City Official Form SP -CI LICENSE APPLICANT: Pursuant to Minnesota statute 270.72 Tax Clearance: Issuance of Licenses, the lic--Dsing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification number and the social security number of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we are required tD advise you of the following regarding the use of this information. I . This infbrmation may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your license in the event you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest, 2. Upon receiving this information, the licensing authority will supply it only to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Infbrmation Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to the Internal Revenue So -vice; I Failure to supply this information mayjeopardim or delay the processing of your licensing issuance of renewal application. Please supply the following inforrnation and return along with your application to the agency issuing the license. DO NOT RETURN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RiEVENUE. LICENSE BEING APPLIED FOR OR RENEWED: Garbaize Hauler. LICENSING AUTHORITY: CLty of Orono, Herinenin CgppZ sota LICEIZE RENEWAL DATE: ___May 31,2017 PERSONAL INFORMATION (if applicable): Applicant's Name Applicant's Address. Social Security Number: 044 U BUSINESS INFORMATION (irappitcabie): Business Natne Business MINNESOTA TAX IDENTIFICATION' NO: J195jeavI $ 1 4!5T -3 S zip state zip FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO: 41-layo95 If a Minnesota Tax Identification number is not required, please explain on the reverse side. Signature I Position (Officer, Partner, etc.) City of Orono Hcense Year 2017-2018 Box 66 (2750 Kelley Padcway) Date Received 4.) —10 e�E Initials "'J Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Fee Paid 00 (952) 249-4600 0 Garbage & Refuse Collector's License Application The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated busimss in the City of Orono and herewith makes applications fcw a license to do so. Business)Filra_&M.J,�, 6L,0 _(�" 14A"Ara Address ?_ _,Z.?ao eo e -2 j�, I e (Street) Business Phone Number 463—q"-2":? (State) — (Zip code) Check One: El In&vidual 19rPartnership [jCorporation Check All That Apply In Orono- Ll Residential I]Connnercial EjRoll-Off Applicanfs Name r7l��O—,e_A A -,7& x7?_/U_ _ 1 1 4 � =31 (Street) (City) (State) (Zip code) Pbo= Number Email NOTE The City of Orono enforces spring weight restrictiow each year. Orono follows the State typically restidotions run from Much V—May 151 each year. Fnies will be given if vehicles are over axel limits of 7 tons per nel. Eaclosed is a copy of the Orono Resolution establishing seasonal weight restrictions on Orono public. city stirmts and a copy of our current year fee schedule. Desm-iption of Vehicles (attach list if more) Number of vehicles to be used in Orono Year M&S. Gross wt. Front Axle Wt Rear Axle Wt. Size;(Y@Z� License Number 16 4�;2e Mz6 V3P_Trz3 Gm=al area of City saved: Schedule of Collection charges/ dates - Approximate number of customers in Orono: Location of dumping area: it IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Application must be filled out in its entirety Surety bond in the amount of $ 1,000 Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000 - $300,000 - $50,000 and I 0 -day canceRation clause Amnual fee is a $75.00 flat rate fee, 1plus $15,00 per truc and a $30.00 traimsfer fee (if applicable) I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. I have verified thatAe above information is correct. !F� — ( -4- Date USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends-, rITY Appnval E]Denial lloffier_(spocify) Signature of City Official Q Form SP -CI LICENSE APPLICANT: Pursuant to Minnesota statute 270.72 Tax Clearance: Issuance of Licenses, the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification number and the social security number of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we we required to advise you of the following regarding the use of this inbrmation: I - This infbimudion may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your license in the event you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest, 2. Upon receiving this information, dw licensing authority will supply it only to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Inflarmation Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to the Internal Revenue Service; 3. Failure to supply this information may jeopardize or delay the processing of your licensing issuance or renewal application. Please supply the following information and return along with your application to the agency issuing the license. DO NOT RETURN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, LICENSE BEING APPLIED FOR Hauler, LICENSING AUTHORITY: Qfty of Orono. Honepin CogM. Minnesota LICENSE RENEWAL DATE: May 31, 2017 PERSONAL INFORMATION (if applicable): Applicant's Namea)M-, ��,eA �P,� Applicant's Address —T-3 zip Social Security Numben. BUSINESS INFORr4ATION (if applicable)., Business Name Business Address —7300 010%'ZJ--7G of.A, ALZ uty - state zip qLja oqel,�B MINNESOTA TAX IDENTIFICATION NO: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO: %2 If a Minnesota Tox Identification number is not required, please explain on the reverse side. -Z 1h t -44- Partner, etc.) Date f) City Of Orono License Year 2017-2018 Box 66 (2750 Kelley Parkway) Date Receind Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Fee Paid �V initi= M2) 249-4600 40 Garbage & Refuse CoRector's License A&Iication The unders'gned wishes to Operate the kdkatcd bminOss 'n the City Of 0=0 und herewith makes 4VIjeations, for a license to do so. Business/Fir"6&�d S4,1v4-,4-,oAj A4dress DFA- -1 AALr — Business Phone Number (Street) (City) (state) (Zip code) 74-3 '%ZZ 7-33�- Cbeck One: El Wividuai Elpartnership 9borporation Cbeck All That Apply In Orono: �ZResidential $atommercial pul-Off Applicant% Name 1-4�tvzi�L Address A,-, 5 (Street) pt�) (state) (zip code) Phone Number "_ NOTIE: The C11yof Orono enforces spring wel&resuicitions each yew, Orono follows the %te,typicaUy restktions run fi-orn March V'- May 15d' each year. Fines will be given ifvolucles are over axel limits of 7 tons per axel. Enclosed is a copy of the Orono Resolution establishing seasonaI wcigW restrictions an Orono public city strzets and a copy of our current year fee schedule. LIRVIIJIUU11 UL V VH19;105 kaUHQn 11SE LY MOM) Number ot VeMleS to be used in Orono Yew Mf ff. Gross wL Front Axle Wt. Rear Axle Wt. akx[Yards LicenseNumb General area of City served: - -e,' ' ,4,; Schedule of Collection cLtarges/ dates, re- -�'j d, j-, HAW- ApProximate number of customers in Orono: Location of dumping area- -7�'' IN ORDER FOR TMS APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Application must be filled out in its entirety Surety bond in the amount of $ 1,000 Proof of insurance in the amount of $ 1 00,DDO - $300,D00 - $50,000 and I 0 -day cancellation clause Annual fim is a $75.00, flat rate fbe, plus $15.00 per and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable) I am the ow= and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and tnes required by law. j have verified that the above information is correct. 5:,--Af�licant Signature bate SE ONLY: After review of application, staff reconmnends: =Valu []Denial []Other —(Specify) Signature of City Official 0 : 1% % 0 C) N I— CNF w — of v CN (6 C%j N P- Cq N 10- L6 N 1,-- csi LO N C6 C14 0 1— cq N 0 V) cli N 0 csi C%4 0 cl� CN 0 OD co C) co It C6 0 CD NT C6 0 C) CNI C) 0 C�. c� C) N m 0 C� m 0 V N a n v C) w 0 w LO L6 0 U) 0 C� CN C6 a 0 N C4 0 0 N CNf LL L o L6 CN o V7 CV cl Cq C%4 n 0 LR r- Cn o q* 00 C14 C4 4T co OD C%j 0 a L'I CNJ a CD P,-- 0 n cf) 0 r.- C� M qt Cl) v w cr) c� cr) C) I-- 0 r- (6 a r- C6 o co C6 g cy) 1-: N CD m ci cm cl C:) (6 N 0 co C6 cn 0 0 0 0 6p v Lo N 0 N 0 N m V m C* 0 a cs :31 P.- V qT co M co m cq —j M cn m M CO -qE m N MT M w m C) (D P- w m M M to 2 m LU m 0 LU m CD LO m 0 ui m 1�- m a —j m Lo CN M 0 M 2 m co C a) U) (D (L rL IL LL CD a A-- .2) LL . 4) C = . P) 2 LL 0) r- - LL 0 a. 0 a. 0 LL 0 c "ID L_ U- LM U- " < :t! EL m LL ao. 0 i 0 cm Co m C) It CD cwo -0 CD -0 C5 p p i- M M LO M LO U') LO c� rl- LLI r- r— N C� a CM N N m v I Nr 0 Form SP -CI LICENSE APPLICANT: Pursuant to Minnesota statute 270,72 Tax Clearance: Issuance of Licenses, the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Minnesota business tax identification number and the social security number of cach license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we am required to advise you of the following regarding the use ofthis information: I . This infarmation may be used to deny the issuance� renewal or transfer of your license in the event you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent taxes, penalties or interest; 2. Upon receiving this information, the licensing authority will supply it only to the Minnewta Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Information Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to the Internal Revenue Service; 3. Failure to supply this information may jeopardize or delay the processing of your licensing issuance or renewal application. Please supply the following information and return along with your application to the agency issuing the license. DO NOT RETURN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. LICENSE BEING APPLIED FOR OR RENEWED: Garbage Hauler LICENSING AUTHORITY: QLq of Orono, Hpnn Min County. Mimesota LICENSE RENEWAL DATE: ___Wy 31, 2017 PERSONAL INFORMATION (if applicable): Applicant's -1 a 4 Applicant's Address_ 9 __ _ V St. S g7 city state zip Social Security Number: " T' -:1 ­ AZ4, ee r" BUSINESS INFORMATION (if applicable): Business Name Business Address �Z3 5 1 tA � I AL., a D 6, o S"Is city State Zip MINNESOTA TAX IDENTEFICATION NO- 11f?-1V9r3 FEDERAL TAX IDENTEFICATIONNO: -/// - 1Y Y If T4 If a -Minnesota, Tax Identification number is not required, please explain on the reverse side. Signature Position (Officer, Partner, etc.) 0— a H4 aty of Orono Box 66 (2750 Kelley Parkway) CryiFtal Day, MN 55323 (951) 2494600 License Year 2017-2018 Date Received , . ' I 11 _J�_f Fee Paid6niv. imtials _q2p TV Garbage & Refuse CoHector's License Application The undoisigned wishes to operate the indicated btWness in the City OfOrOUO and bam-with makes applications for a license to do so. Business/Firm Veft Container Corp DBA Veit Disoosal Svstems Address 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374 (Street) (City) (State) (zip cO&) Business Plione Number 763-428-2242 Chock One- [:] Individual []Parmersln F;2corpmtion Check All That Apply In Orono. [:]Residential ElCommMia [JR,11-Off Applicant'j; N —Bruce Wuollet Address 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 553_74 (Strem) (City) (State) (zip code) Phone Number 763-428-2242 Email bwuolletftypitusa.corn NOTM The City of On= onfivoes sping weight rearicuons each year Orono follows the It" typically resWedOmFwfiumMamhl"—MaYI50'ewhym- Flnes will be given if velticles am over axel limits OF7 tonsperaxel. &closad is a copy of the Orono Resolution egabtiWiiag seasonal weight restdctiow on Orom Public MY streets and a copy of our current year fee schedule. jz—jjWjjWH SLL..XE-pAs kauarm ust ii more) Year MhL. Ciro" WL Front Axle Wt I Number Of Vehicleg to be used in Orono Rear AgS Wt kk&ase Number- -Rasic.bf-s General areaof City served: __ AS requested by clients Schadwe of collection charges/ dates. only as requested by clients Approximate number of customers in Orono: N/A Location of dumping am: Vonco 1116301 14Dth Ave SE Becker, MIN 55308 IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BY. PROCESSED, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING - 0 Application must be filled out in its entirety 0 Smety bond in the amount of S1,000 0 Proof of kanvice in the amount of $100,ODO - $300,000 - $50,000 and 10 -day cancellation claum 0 Annual fee is a JZJA flat rate foo, plus SIS.N pw tmdk, and a S30.00 fmnsfer fee (lf applicable) I am the owner and operator of the above, business and I have paid all Hccnae fees and taxes. nquired by law. I have verified that the*".". 'oformation is correct 5-4-2017 Applicant Sigmrture Bruce Wuol let I Director of Operations Daft SE ONLY* After review of application, staff recommends: / ) OVYaU 013anial Elothar (Specify) Signature Of City official Form SP -0 LICENSE APPLICANT: Pursuant to Minnesota statute 270.72 Tax Clewwxce: Issuance of Licenses, the licensing authority is required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue your Miamsota business tax identification number and the social security number of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Govenunent Dam Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we are required to advise You Of the fbIlowing regarxiing the use of this itatrtnation: I - 11is infbrmation may be umd to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your licw3e in the event you owe the Minnesota Department of Revenue delinquent tans, penalties or interes4 2. Upon receiving this information, die licensing authority wil I supply it only to the Minnesota Departmem of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Information Agreement the Department of Revenue may supply this information to die Internal Revenue Service; 3. Failure to supply this infomation may jeopardize or delay the processing of your licensing issuance or renewal application. Please supply the following information and return along with your application to the agency issuing the license. DO NOT RETURN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. LICENSE BEING APPLIED FOR OR RENEWED: Renew at e Hauler LICENSING AUTHORITY: of Qroa2JHcwm9a ComV, Minn Agota LICENSE RENEWAL DATE: May 31, 2017 PERSONAL INFORMATION (trapplicable): Applicant's Name Bruce Wuollet Applicant's Address 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374 city state zip Social Security Number: BUSINESS INFORMATION (If applicable): BusinessName Ve..ft. Contiiner Corp DBA Veit Disposal Svstems Business Address 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 5gU4 city State zip MINNESOTA TAX IDENTIFICATION NO:. 288542B FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO: 41-1663417 If a Minnesota Tax Identification number is not required, pleasc explain on the reverse side. Bruce Wuoilet / Di Signature Position (Officer, Partner, atc.) Date AGENDAITEM Item No.: Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Surface Water Management Plan Proposal Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to proceed with the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP). 2. Background. The Surface Water Management Plan is a required part of the City's Community Management Plan (CMP). The last SWMP was prepared in 2011. This Surface Water Management Plan is intended to serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Orono in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources and comply with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act, Minnesota Rules 8410, and the requirements of the local watershed management organizations. This document provides an inventory of water resource related information including the results of assessments conducted by other governmental units, both local and state. From this inventory and assessment, Orono sets forth its goals and policies and implementation program 3. Project Scope. The project scope includes facilitating communication with relevant agencies and the public; Inventory of land and water resources within Orono; Stormwater Modeling, and preparation of the report. 4. Cost. Bolton and Menk has prepared a Proposal to complete the report for a fee NTE $24,808. (Exhibit A.) 5. Funding. This project will be funded through the Storm Water Enterprise Fund. The estimated 2017 year-end balance for the Storm water fund is $1,453,394. 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that acceptance of Bolton Menk's Proposal. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to accept Bolton and Menk's proposal to complete the SWMP for a fee NTE $24,808. Exhibits A. Bolton and Menk Proposal. References A. 2011 SWMP Prepared By: A-7 Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. May 9, 2017 Adam Edwards Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55232 RE: Surface Water Management Plan Dear Adam: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, IVIN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 BoLton-Menk.com As requested, we have prepared a scope of services and fee estimate for completing the Surface Water Management Plan for the City. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work: Task 1: Communication • Conduct an initial meeting with City staff to coordinate plan components and schedule. • Coordinate and meet with City staff as necessary to review plan progress, discuss interim findings and recommendations, and solicit ideas and insight. • Coordinate and meet with reviewing agencies as necessary to ensure plan is proceeding in accordance with regulatory requirements (i.e. Minnehaha. Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council, and the Board of Water and Soil Resources). • Coordinate with the City as necessary to provide an opportunity for public involvement. • Attend City Council meetings as necessary to apprise Council of plan progress, present a draft plan in a workshop, and present the final plan at a public hearing. Task 2: Land and Water Resources Invento1y • Review existing inventory of key resources needing protection with City staff (i.e. native prairie communities, heavily wooded areas, greenways, streams, wetlands, lakes, and wellhead protection zones). • Provide written description of inventory as well as updated GIS mapping of all land and water resources. 0 Provide printed copies of inventory mapping, as necessary. Task 3: Storm Water Modeling • Update or establish location and characteristics of the storm water drainage system components in GIS through review of City mapping, Record Drawings, available topographic maps, and field reconnaissance. • Coordinate review of storm water drainage system mapping with City staff as necessary to ensure accuracy of existing conditions. H:\ORNO\2017 New Projects\Orono SWMP\Fee Estimate - SWMP.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Surface Water Management Plan May 9, 2017 • Create XPSWMM model of the storm water drainage system using obtained data and updated GIS mapping. • Calibrate XPSWMM model through review with City staff of comparisons between model predictions and experienced flood events. • Evaluate the existing storm water drainage system for areas of vulnerability (i.e. flooding, lack of storage, lack of attenuation, erosion, etc.) and coordinate locations requiring further assessment with City staff. • Prepare a list of potential solutions to vulnerabilities for locations deemed necessary through review with City staff, including opinions of probable costs to help optimize prioritization. • Update City's GIS system with current basin data (i.e. peak inflows, peak outflows, and 100 year high water levels) and recommended storm water drainage system improvements (including design descriptions and costs). 0 Provide printed copies of storm water drainage system mapping, as necessary. Task 4: SWMP Report e Prepare written Surface Water Management Plan to include all components required by Minnesota Statute 10313.23 5 and Minnesota Rule 84 10. e Review City's SVv`PPP and incorporate provisions as necessary to meet requirements of the City's MS4 permit. AssuMptions • No surveys will be performed as part of this proposal. • No wetland delineations will be performed as part of this proposal. Based on the scope of services described above, we propose a not -to -exceed fee of $24,808 to be billed on an hourly basis. Following is a breakdown of estimated costs per Task. Task 1: Communication $ 3,864 Task 2: Land and Water Resources Inventory $ 1,400 Task 3: Stormwater Modeling $ 16,112 Task 4: Surface Water Management Plan Rgport $ 3,432 Total $ 24,808 Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer H:\ORNO\2017 New Projects\Orono SWMP\Fee Estimate - SWMP.docx Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. AGENDAITEM Item No.: Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Appointment of 2017 Seasonal Employees Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Work Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval of seasonal employees. 2. Background. The hourly pay is proposed to be $10.00-12.00 for the Golf Course Clubhouse Attendants; Golf Course Maintenance Assistants and Parks Maintenance Workers; a pay range of $10.25-15.22 for the Utilities Maintenance Worker; and a pay range of $15.00-$20.00 for the Assistant Superintendent and Clubhouse Manager. The clubhouse manager will be enrolled in the coordinated PERA plan. All other seasonal employees will fall under the 6 month PERA Classification and are there for excluded from PERA membership. 3. Seasonal Employee Appointments and Candidates. 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: 7E Reviewed By: 7F— Approved By: D5R, Name Position Wage Remarks ($/hr) Robert Howells G.C. Clubhouse Manager $18.00 Returnee Jason Goehring G.C. Assistant Superintendent $16.00 Returnee C11 Ivan Corazalla G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $12.00 Returnee Paul Tolzmarm G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $11.00 Returnee Diane Otrey G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $10.00 New Rebecca Anderson Utilities Maintenance Worker $11.00 Returnee Ed Kvam G.C. Maintenance Assistant $10.00 Returnee Calvin Schmidt G.C. Maintenance Assistant $10.00 Returnee > Marshall Hambro G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $11.00 Returnee Wendy Middendorf G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $10.00 New Ron Vanacora G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $10.00 New Requesting Sam Baurle G.C. Maintenance Assistant $10.00 New Approval rP--a—tr—ick Codute G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $10.00 New 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: 7E Reviewed By: 7F— Approved By: D5R, AGENDAITEM Item No.: 7 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: #16-3822 Lakewest Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Extension of Effective Period of Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve a I -year extension/renewal of the preliminary plat and general concept plan approval granted in Resolution No. 6655 on July 25, 2016. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd: 5/15/17 Complete: 5/15/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 7/14/17 3. Background. Preliminary Plat and General Concept Plan approval for a 27 -lot Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) plat at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard ("Eisinger Meadows") was granted via Resolution No. 6655 on July 25, 2016. Due to market conditions and other reasons, applicant Lakewest LLC is planning to temporarily delay development of the property but wishes to maintain the ability to proceed with the development at a future date in accordance with the prior approvals. Lakewest has requested a one-year extension of the effective period of preliminary plat and general concept plan approval, which per Orono ordinances runs for one year from the date of approval. The extension would be to July 25, 2018. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff believes it would be appropriate to grant a one-year extension of the effective period of general concept plan and preliminary plat approval per the attached resolution. Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution, COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached ordinance entitled A Resolution Granting a One -Year Extension to the Effective Period of General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval Established per Resolution No. 6655 - File No. 16-3822. Exhibits A — Resolution for Extension B — Extension Application C — Resolution No. 6655 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Mike Gaffron Approved By: D5R CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL ESTABLISHED PER RESOLUTION NO. 6655 - FILE NO. 16-3822 WHEREAS, on July 25, 2016, the City Council of the City of Orono (the "City") adopted Resolution No, 6655 granting preliminary plat and general concept plan approval for subdivision of property located at 3425 Wayzata Boulevard; and WHEREAS, City of Orono Municipal Code Section 82-117 establishes that preliminary plat approval is effective for one year from the date of such approval, and failure to file a complete final subdivision application within this time period shall be considered as formal withdrawal of the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, due to market conditions and other reasons, applicant Lakewest LLC is planning to temporarily delay development of the property but wishes to maintain the ability to proceed with the development at a future date in accordance with the prior approvals granted in Resolution No. 6655.; and WHEREAS, Lakewest LLC has requested a one-year extension of the effective period of preliminary plat and general concept plan approval, to July 25, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The effective period of preliminary plat approval is hereby extended to July 25, 2018; and 2. All other terms and conditions of Resolution No. 6655 are hereby reaffirmed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono Subdivision Application StreatAddress: Application 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Datelftcelved: staff Main: 952-249-46130 Application Fee: fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address. Escrow: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Notes: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: wo Property Identification Number Date Property Acquired (monthlyear)- / t / Zb jf7— Abstract 11 Torrens (Please check one) Present use of property: )CResidential; number of Units 0 Other (specify) Zoning District. Walat APPLICANT INFORMATION. 13 check here if Aulicant address should be used fnr hillinn Applicant: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: A�check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 c�eck here il� Property Owner address should be used for billing L, , . f - j --Pll-. 1, - - uppl� Phone (Primary): Mailing Address - Email: EXISTING LAND USE: Number of Tax Parcels: Development Size: Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres TOTAL, all parcels I PROPOSED LAND USE: 0 Division for Tax Purposes xSubdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units: New Units: Total Units: 51 Proposed Gross Density Units per acres Minimum Lot Size: Square feet dry buildable land Proposed Use (check) �Resldential 1 13 Other (specify) &9 CIA� '22"' IKUL 0 if JHI&�/ Subdivision Application — January 2017 Page 5 APPLICANTIAGENT ANWOR PROPERTY OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigaflon and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: '46t�- Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: SubdMsibn Applicatlon — January 2017 Page 6 Date:-- 5111) Date: Date: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 655 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN AND GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST - FILE NO. 16-3822 WHEREAS, Lakewest, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter the "Developer") is owner of the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A (attached) (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for development of the Property. Proposed is a rezoning from RR-lB, One Family Rural Residential District to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District for construction of 27 single-family homes; and WHEREAS, the Developerhas concurrently requested an amendment of the 2008- 2030 Orono Community Management Plan ("CMP") to allow said development at a density of approximately 5.5 dwelling units per acre, rather than the 10-15 units per acre for which the Property is guided in the CMP; and WHEREAS, on April 4, 2016 the Developer filed a complete formal application with the City for Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and concept plan & preliminary plat approval for a 27 -lot residential subdivision of the Property; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 4-62.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing for the application and reviewed it on April 18, 2016, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on April 18, 2016 recommended on a vote of 4-1 that the Council grant the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment; on a vote of 5-0 that the Council approve the rezoning to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District; and on a vote of 5-0 that the Council grant general concept plan and preliminary Plat approval subject to a number of conditions and recommendations; and Page 1 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 WHEREAS, the Orono City Council was given the opportunity to review sketch plans for the Property in regular meetings in September 2014 and January 2016, and has reviewed the formal application at its regular meetings on May 9 and July 11, 2 016; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2016 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6637 granting preliminary approval for Amendment #5 of the 2008-2030 Community Management Plan, and sid Amendment was forwarded to the Metropolitan Council on June 29, 2016 for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby makes the following findings in regard to this application for RPUD General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat approval, cMp amendment, and rezoning: 1"I LIIVKW� A. Communily Management Plan Conformity, CMP Amendment 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File # 16-3 822. 2. The Property is currently zoned RR-lB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District, requiring a minimum residential lot size of 2.0 acres. The property contains approximately 29 gross acres exclusive of Wayzata Boulevard right -of way, but of which only approximately 5 acres is developable, the remainder consisting of wetlands and a closed landfill. 3. The proposed use of the Property for residential development at a density of 5.5 units per acre is inconsistent with the Orono 2008-2030 CMP guiding of the Property for residential development at a density of 10-15 units per acre. The Developer has applied for an amendment of the CMP to reguide the Property to allow development at a density of 5.5 units per acre. 4. The proposed development is within the area west of Old Crystal Bay Road, south of Wayzata Boulevard and north of Highway 12. This area has been zoned RR- 1 B, 2 -acre minimum lot size (0.5 units/acre) since 1975. In the 2008-2030 CMP the Property was reguided to allow an overall density of 10- 15 units per acre, which likely would only be achievable via a mix of attached townhomes and larger multi -family buildings. The rationale for the density increase at this site was primarily the location sandwiched between two high -traffic roadways; the potential availability of municipal utility services; and the remote location from single family residential development. Page 2 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 5. In Part the density increase was established to meet Metropolitan. Council goals by guiding carefully -selected parcels at densities that would potentially allow for more affordable housing options. Met Council guidelines require an overall new sewered development density of at least 3 units per acre. In order to 1-neet these goals, certain parcels within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) were guided for densities significantly higher than 3 units/acre — to allow those shoreland areas in the MUSA historically zoned and planned for low density, to develop at the 1 -acre and 2 -acre lot sizes desired by the City. 6. The City Council has reviewed the development proposal with regards to the CMP and finds that it meets a number of goals for housing as established within the Housing element of the CMP, including: Provides opportunities for housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader -range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. Provides housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. 7. The City Council has granted preliminary approval for the amendment per the findings contained within Resolution No. 6377 adopted June 27, 2016, and it has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. B. Rezoning from RR- I B to RPUD 8. The Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is intended to be developed using municipal sewer and water. Municipal sewer and water are planned to be extended to serve the property. 9. Because the property is proposed to be reguided in the C.MP for single family residential use at a density of 3 -7 units per acre, use, the property should be rezoned consistent with the intended and guided use. The most appropriate zoning for the intended use is RPLJD, Residential Planned Unit Development District. 10. The property contains approximately 29 gross acres exclusive of Wayzata Boulevard right -of way, but of which only approximately 5 acres is developable, the remainder consisting of wetlands and a closed landfill. The property meets the conditions of Zoning Code Section 78-626(l) for rezoning to RPUD because it exceeds five acres in area. While a small portion of the Property is within the designated Shoreland Overlay District, the Council finds that the RPUD requirement that the property be outside the Shoreland District should be waived since a majority of the area to be developed is not within said District. Page 3 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 655 11. Rezoning the property to RPLTD Residential Planned LTnit Development is appropriate based on the medium -density residential nature of the proposal, which meets the following general purposes of the RPUD District: a) incorporates flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction.and land development; b) provides lifecycle housing with the potential to meet affordable and moderate cost housing needs; c) incorporates energy conservation through the clustering of buildings and land uses; d) preserves desirable site characteristics and open space and protects sensitive environmental features, including sensitive wetland areas, while avoiding the portions of the property which are encumbered by a closed landfill; e) provides design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; results in a sensitive development in the transitional area located between low- density single family uses to the north and south, taking into account the location between two arterial highway corridors as well as the agriculturally used property to the east guided for future medium-high density residential use; and g) yields development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guiding for higher density than the typical urban and rural residential development in Orono. C. Environmental Considerations; Site Planning & Amenities-, wortation; 12. Conservation Design. Pursuant to the City's Conservation Design ordinances the Developer has submitted a Conservation Development report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC dated April 3,2016 and supplemented April 30,2016. Key elements of the report include a Natural Resources Inventory of the non -developing portions of the site including review of the MLCCS Land Cover Classification data, wetland delineations (approved by the MCWD), site vegetation review, and outlining of a basic Conservation Design Ma ' ster Plan. The information was supplemented by the Developer with a detailed tree inventory of the portion of the property being developed, as well as a preliminary stormwater management plan. Page 4 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL The Master Plan focuses primarily on the retention and enhancement of buffer areas along the westerly and southerly borders of the non -developing sanitary landfill portion of the site, depicted as Areas A, B and C. Where buckthorn exists, it will be required to be removed. Specific seed mixes are proposed for the buffer areas. Stormwater will be managed by a stonn sewer system directing runoff to a filtration basin and ponding area at the west end of the development site, discharging to the existing wetlands. Rate, volume and sediment control are addressed, Direct wetland impacts will be avoided. Wetland buffers are proposed including buffer averaging intended to meet MCWD requirements. Wetland and hydrologic connections will be maintained. 13. Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted.'The property contains 2 distinct areas that have been delineated as Preserve wetland. No wetlands are proposed to be impacted. Buffer averaging is proposed subject to MCVv1D rules and requiring that agency's approval. The reported MCWD base buffer width requirement is reported as 75 feet, with a minimum of 67 feet. Applicants have proposed a buffer avregae of 71 feet, ranging in actual buffer width of 40 feet adjacent to the north portion of wetland area and 85 feet adjacent to the east and west portions. The proposed buffer plan results in approximately 167,200 s.f. of buffers, slightly over the minimum MCWD requirement of 166,400 s.f. The City code requires a minimum structure setback of 35' from the wetland boundary, plus 10' additional where the 35' setback would be less dim 10' from a MCWD required buffer. The City will require a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands being preserved. 14. Tree and/or Woodland Impacts. The portion of the site being developed contains a variety of mature tree species including deciduous hardwoods (oak, maple, ash, linden and walnut) as well as white pines, scotch pines and spruce. Approximately 115 trees were inventoried within the anticipated limits of grading, and virtually all inventoried trees are anticipated to be removed as a result of the development. Outside the development area, along the perimeter of the landfill area, a majority of trees are volunteer weed trees consisting mainly of box elder, with buckthorn invading at the southern boundary of the site. The Conservation Design Master Plan calls for removal of the buckthorn from "Area B", while the hackberry and other tree species will be allowed to remain as a visual and sound barrier from the Highway 12 corridor. Page 5 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO� 6655 15. Landscaping. The proposed landscaping plans (Sheets B15 thru B19) will be evaluated for compliance with the very detailed RPUD landscaping requirements. The preliminary landscape plans (Exhibits B- 13 thru B- 16) indicate 15 5 trees will be planted within the development area, to include roughly equal proportions of deciduous, coniferous and ornamental species. Additionally the preliminary plans call for approximately 160 shrubs including lilac, dogwood and nannyberry species. 16. Conformity with Zoning District Standards. In relation to the RPLTD standards, there are specific guidelines for detached single family development in Zoning Code Section 78-626(8). The RPUD standards as written for detached single family use do not accommodate the type of smaller, narrow lot style of development that is proposed. However, the concept of a planned unit development process is to allow flexibility in design. Section 78-626(16) provides for flexibility in RPUD standards, as follows: (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPLJD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. This proposed development concept requires a significant departure (flexibility) from the RPUD district lot standards for individual homesites. The table below identifies specific standards which require flexibility, which the City Council finds acceptable: RPUD District Minimum Proposed Flexibiflty I SFR Standard I Lot Standards Required? Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet 4,614 s —f— 11,928 s.f. Yes Minimum lot width at setback line: 90 feet Varies — ap. 40'+ Yes Minimum lot dTth: Vanes — most are 90+ Yes Minimum front building setback (to 25 feet Varies 10'-25' internal streets): Yes Minimum rear or side setback to 50 feet Q feet typ. Yes Wayzata Boulevard: Page 6 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 Minimum side setback to internal street: 25 feet Lot 9 B I - 1: 10' Others OK Yes Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet 5' for niost lots Yes Minimum rear yard setback: Lesser of 40' or Varies widely 20% of lot!Le2th Yes Wetland building setback: Greater of 35 fee or Greater of 35 feet or - MCWD buffer plus 10 feet MCWD buffer olus 10 feet No Building height: Maximum of 30 feet, 2-1/2 Dependilig on topography, Yes stories some sites will require basements that would defined as stories, hence there may be some 3 -story homes All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a width of at least NO 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. 17. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Zoning Code Section 78-1403 limits Lot Coverage by Structures for lots less than 2 acres in area to 15%. For this development the 15% Lot Coverage limitation shall not be applicable. Per the RPUD standards an individual lot Floor Area Ratio (FAR = gross area of all floors divided by gLoss lot area) of 0.5.would normally be applicable. Applicants have requested flexibility with regards to the FAR, requesting an average FAR of 0.782 based on the extremely small lot sizes averaging 6,661 s.f The Council finds -that this is acceptable given that the individual lots have been reduced in size by excluding wetl and buffer areas from the individual lots. This is finther justified by resulting in buffer maintenance to be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association rather than individual lot owners. The average FAR calculation of 0.782 is based on the existing site layout and conceptual building designs and footprints as depicted in the various Plans and Drawings attached as Exhibit B. At the time individual building permits are reviewed, proposed individual site plans shall be reviewed for conformity with the conceptual plans attached. 18. Hardcover. By virtue of the RPUD zoning, per 78-1701(4)(a) the property is assigned to Hardcover Protection Tier 4, which allows up to 50% hardcover of the gross lot area. Only the smallest of the proposed lots would appear to approach that limit. The average hardcover estimated by the applicant is based on a 1,660 s.f. house footprint and 700 s.f. driveway, resulting in a 35% hardcover average. With approximately only 20% of the lots being less than 5,000 s.f., the average overall hardcover maximum of 50% should be achievable. Page 7 of 19 CiTY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NT 0. 6655 19. Streets. All 27 lots will be served by a new internal road system to be constructed by the developer to City standards, with the east -west segment within a platted private Outlot having a minimum paved road width of 28 feet (back of curb to back of curb). The north -south segment shall be constructed and platted as a public road, paved at a minimurn width of 32 feet (back of curb to back of curb) and established to public street standards, in anticipation of possible future multi -family development within the landfill area.. All 27 lots will have driveways accessing the new internal road system, and none shall have direct driveway access to Wayzata Boulevard. The easterly end of the development shall end in a cul-de-sac of standard City dimension. The Developer shall establish a surmountable access for emergency vehicle use only from the cul-de-sac to Wayzata Boulevard. 20. Access to Wayzata Boulevard. Hennepin County has indicated preliminary approval for one access point to Wayzata Boulevard at the westerly end of the site. The preliminary indications are that no additional right-of-way for Wayzata Boulevard will be required, although turn lanes will be required. With the internal road system being privately owned and maintained, the standard City underlying road easements and maintenance covenants will be required. 21. Street Maintenance. The east -west segrnent platted as a private Outlot shall be permanently maintained by a homeowners ass,ociation (HOA) to be established by the developer. The north- south segment platted as a public road shall be maintained by the HOA pursuant to a maintenance agreement between the HOA and the City, until such time that the landfill area to the south is developed for additional uses, at which time the City will deterniine whether it is appropriate for the City to take over maintenance of the north -south segment. 22. Future Road Extensions. The westerly terminus of the north -south road ending at a parking area with back-up apron has the potential to be extended to serve future development. To avoid future neighborhood confusion, barriers and signage shall be established indicating the road potentially will be extended in the future. 23. Easements Required. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries as well 'as conservation and flowage easements over the delineated wetlands will be required. Drainage easements will also be required over all stormwater management facilities. 24. Lighting. Internal street lighting should be at a low level consistent with the surrounding rural residential character while providing the necessary level of Page 8 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 6655 security, and will be maintained by the homeowners association. Private street lighting will be provided by the developer, then maintained through standard agreement between the homeowners association and the appropriate public utility company. 25. 10% Private Park R.PUD Requirement. The private recreation area of '10% of the platted property' required under the RPUD standards will be satisfied via a neighborhood park near the west end of the development, plus a trail system throughout the perimeter of the landfill area as shown in the attached Trail Plan. 26. Park and Trail Dedication. There are no identifiable public parkland needs at this location. However, development of the proposed housing will generate additional use of existing City park facilities in the area. The Council finds that no park lands need to be dedicated and the park dedication should be in the form of a Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands as allowed by the Municipal Code. Additionally, the Council finds that although no public trails along the property boundaries are planned, it would be prudent to obtain a trail easement over the northerly 10 feet of the property for' potential future trail use, such easement to coincide with the required 10' drainage and utility easement in that same location. The developer and/or individual property owners shall be allowed to landscape the trail easement area subject to execution by the Developer of an Encroachment Agreement establishing that if a future trail is constructed, the landscaping may be removed to accommodate such trail with no compensation to the property owners. 27 Stormwater Management. Stormwater management is proposed to be provided by a stormwater pond area at the west end of the site, which will ultimately discharge to the major wetland on the site. The stormwater facilities will be subject to standard drainage easements. In addition to the City of Orono, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have approval authority over the applicants' stormwater management plan. Final stormwater plans will be subject to the recommendations and approval of the City Engineer. 28. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements & Fees. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee. Recent Council action to revise the Trunk Fee provisions would result in a fee (for development at greater than 4.0 units per acre) of $8,490 per acre (2016 Fee Schedule), based on non -wetland acreage. The area of the landfill shall not be included in the acreage charged. The acreage charge shall be calculated based on the area of individual platted lots plus Page 9 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 the area of roads (Outlots C & D) and private park (Outlot B) and to be consistent with the provisions of the City ordinance, shall include wetland buffer areas adjacent to the individual lots. 29. Utility Locations/Availability/Assessments/Connection Fees. Municipal sewer and water utilities are planned to be extended westward from the intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road and Wayzata Boulevard in 2017 to serve development at this site and properties further east ' The property has not been previously assessed for sewer and water, Sewer and water connection charges ("local SAC and WAC") have been preliminarily determined based on the estimated costs of construction of the extensions and apportioned between the three properties expected for future development. Preliminary connection charges for the applicants' site are estimated at $307,878 for municipal water and $220,567 for municipal sanitary sewer. 30. The applicant has provided General Concept Plans and Preliminary Plat Drawings attached to this Resolution as Exhibits B-1 through B-22 including: BI - Plan Sheet I of 12 — Cover Sheet dated 07-18-2016 B2 - Plan Sheet 2 of 12 — Existing Conditions dated 07-18-2016 B3 - Plan Sheet 3 of 12 — Preliminary Plat dated 07-18-2016 B4 - Plan Sheet 4 of 12 — Preliminary Plat (enlarged) dated 07-18-2016 B5 - Plan Sheet 5 of 12 — Preliminary Sewer & Water Main Plan dated 07-18-2016 B6 - Plan Sheet 6 of 12 — Preliminary Street & Storm Sewer Plan dated 07-18-2016 B7 - Plan Sheet 7 of 12 — Preliminary Grading Plan dated 07-18-2016 B8 - Plan Sheet 8 of 12 — Preliminary SWPPP dated 07-18-2016 B9 - Plan Sheet 9 of 12 — Preliminary Tree Inventory Plan dated 07-18-2016 B 10 - Plan Sheet 10 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B I I - Plan Sheet 11 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B 12 - Plan Sheet 12 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B 13 - Planting Plan L-1 — Trees (undated) B14 - Planting Plan L-2 — Shrubs (undated) B15 - Planting Plan L-3 — Cross Section & Details (undated) B16 - Planting Plan — Aerial (undated) B17 - Streetscape B 18 - Home Layouts B 19 - House Plan A Elev & Floor Plans B20 - House Plan B Elev & Floor Plans B21 - House Plan C Elev & Floor Plans B22 - Trail Plan dated 03-23-2016 Page 10 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.— 6 6.95 Council finds that the plans submitted are generally sufficient to indicate the intent of the developer and the potential impacts of the project. 31. City Engineer Comments. The City's consulting engineer has provided comments and recommendations regarding all aspects of the development plans, in a letter dated April 11, 2016. Those comments are attached hereto as Exhibit C. General Development Plans and Final Plat approvals will be reviewed for conformity with these recommendations. 32. The City Council finds that the development of this property must set a high standard for the quality, character, context and compatibility of development desired by the City for medium density development in Orono. The Council finds that the proposed comprehensive plan reguiding, rezoning and proposed development of the property for medium density single-family residential use is appropriate for the property, will not have negative impacts on the surrounding properties when all Concept Plan Approval conditions are met, and is in keeping with the goals, policies and philosophies of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat for development of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West subject to the following declarations and conditions: 1. This approval is subject to the prior approval by the Metropolitan Council of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the property from High Density Residential (10- 15 units per acre) to Medium Density Residential (3 -7 units per acre), and this approval shall not take effect until such time that Metropolitan Council approval is granted. 2. The City of Orono will approve rezoning of the property to RPUD as described herein upon City Council finding of satisfactory completion of the Conditions for Development Plan approval. 3. Conditions for Development Plan Approval are as follows: Page 11 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 65 5 A. RPUD Development Standards and General Conditions. 1) The total number of residential dwelling units shall be 27 single-family homes generally as configured on the preliminary site plan attached as Exhibits B3 and B4. 2) Developer shall provide a final Development Plan for the development that conforms to all standards of the RPUD District except as modified herein, and shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all RPUD standards have been met and shall demonstrate where such standards have not been met, and shall satisfy the City Council that non-compliance with said standards is remedied in a manner acceptable to the Council. 3) Developer shall provide a final landscaping plan meeting all of the requirements of the RPUD District and addressing the elements of Conservation Design to the satisfaction of the City Council. Final landscaping plans will be reviewed for conformity with the RPUD standards. 5) Street lighting if proposed shall be provided by the Developer and shall be of a style, number, height and location approved by the City Council. Street lighting shall be downcast, fully shielded and at a low level consistent with the surrounding rural residential character while providing the necessary level of security. 6) Building footprints and styling shall be generally per the examples included in the attached Exhibit B-18 thru B-21. Developer shall make every attempt to ensure that identical dwelling units are not placed side-by-side. 7) Flexibility shall being granted for the lot area, width and setback standards of the RPUD District and with regards to hardcover and FAR as noted in the Findings section above. 9) Development shall be subject to adherence to a Conservation Design Master Plan schedule of activities which shall be submitted for approval prior to final plat approval. 10) Significant trees shall be preserved where feasible based. on the grading plans, and landscaping plans to be in accordance with RPUD standards. Page 12 of 19' CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 1) Applicant to confirm with SHPO that that there are no archaeological sites within the property. 12) Applicant shall dedicate an easement for potential future public trail purposes over the northerly 10 feet of the property. B. Transportation 1 The new internal roads serving the development shall be constructed by the developer to City standards. All 27 lots shall have driveways accessing the new internal road system, and none shall have direct driveway access to Wayzata Boulevard. The cast -west segment shall be platted as a private Outlot having a corridor width of 40 feet and a minimum paved road width of 28 feet (back of curb to back of curb). The north -south segment shall be constructed and platted as a public road having a corridor width of 50 feet and paved at a minimum width of 32 feet (back of curb to back of curb), in anticipation of possible future multi -family development within the landfill area. The easterly end of the development shall end in a cul-de-sac of standard City dimension. The Developer shall establish a surmountable access for emergency vehicle use only, from the cul-de-sac to Wayzata Boulevard. Future road maintenance shall be as indicated in the findings section of this resolution. 2) Concrete curb & gutter will be required. Individual driveway approaches within the private right-of-way shall be of concrete. 3) All curve radii shall be reviewed to ensure that moving vans, garbage trucks, firetrucks, etc. are accommodated. The Long Lake Fire Department shall review the interior road system, and any revisions required for fire -protection purposes shall be made by the Developer subject to City approval. 4) Appropriate traffic control signage within and pertinent to the site shall be installed by the Developer subject to the City Engineer's review and approval. C. Utilities; Stormwater Management 1) Sewer and water mains shall be installed by the Developer per the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B-6, subject Page 13 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 6655 to the modifications noted in the City Engineer's comments in Exhibit C. 2) The City will own and maintain the sanitary sewer and water mains within the development. The City will inspect these systems during their construction to ensure proper installation. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be granted to the City of Orono over all sewer and water main lines and facilities that are not within dedicated public rights-of-way in order to facilitate future system maintenance. 3) The Developer shall install stormwater management facilities generally as shown on the various attached plans. Developer shall provide suitable evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval of the stormwater management plan before Development Plan and Final Plat Approval will be granted. The Developer shall provide sufficient drainage and utility easements as necessary to allow for future City maintenance access for stormwater management facilities. The stormwater drainage facilities will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. D. Wetland Impacts 1) Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as administrator of the WCA regulations on Orono's behalf, are complied with. E. Grading, Erosion Control Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and to the approved SWPPP. All erosion controls as required by the City and the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencing excavation on the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working order until the site is revegetated. 2) The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and vegetation outside of the construction limits area. Developer shall identify trees to be preserved on site, shall mark them on a site plan, and shall take extraordinary measures such as fencing, signage, etc. to ensure they are not disturbed. Page 14 of 19 F. Other General Conditions. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 1) Monument signs may be provided by the developer at the entrance to the RPLJD development site. The signage shall be limited to a development name and/or logo on the monument signs. Final design/materials of monument signage shall be provided as part of the final development plan submittals and shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 5) The applicable general engineering comments and or conditions provided by City Engineer Robert Bean dated April 11, 2016 in relation to the Concept Plan review and attached hereto as Exhibit C shall be suitably addressed by applicant in the development plan submittal. 3) Developer shall create a Homeowners Association (HOA) and covenants establishing development design standards as well as responsibilities for maintenance of roads, con-unon spaces, stormwater facilities, etc. Developer shall provide proposed covenants and documents describing the structure, rights and responsibilities of the HOA for review by City Attorney. G. Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions: Final plans and specifications for all proposed utility lines and services, including any proposed revisions to existing service facilities. Proposed plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the Final Plan set. 'Me Public Works Department a ' nd any other pertinent reviewing agencies shall review and approve all utility improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided and are subject to approval by the Public Works Department and City Engineer. 2) Final Street and Storm Sewer Plans. 3) Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP showing existing and proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. General Development Plan Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater plans. Page 15 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO 6 65 5 4) Final Landscaping Plan with planting schedules including numbers and species, in accordance with the landscaping requirements of the RPUD zoning district, and the recommendations contained within the Conservation Design Master Plan. 5) Detailed monument signage and street lighting plans if any. 6) Any additional plans and specifications deemed necessary by the City as review progresses. H. Platting Process. Applicant shall complete all requirements for Final Plat Approval as follows. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator 2 weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (3) mylar copies (one copy�for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to I " = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat ey/drawing by Campion Engineering Services dated C -thal.206� attached hereto as Exhibit B3 & B4, except as modified herein. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property lines.. C. Dedication of areas shown as wetlands. D. Dedipation of "Drainage Easements" over all drainageways E. Naming of plat. f 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded casements currently affecting the property. Page 16 of 19 CLATY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.— 6655 C. Signed Conservation and Flowage Easement to be granted over all delineated wetlands on the plat. D. Signed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of improvements. The City Engineer shall establish the amount to be provided in the Letter of Credit. E. Signed Trail Easement over the northerly 10 feet of the property. 3. Final plat approval fee to be paid: Total due. $ 700.00 Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the development. J. Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The City Engineer shall complete an estimate of improvement costs, including but not limited to public and private streets, curb & gutter, sidewalks, storm sewers, landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, driveways and parking areas, trails, sidewalks, retaining walls and stormwater management facility construction, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of 150% of the improvement costs. K. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee, due at the time of final plat approval. The Trunk Fee provisions result in a fee for development at 4.0 units per acre or greater of $ 8,490 per acre (2016 Fee Schedule), based on non -wetland acreage. The acreage calculation for Trunk Fee purposes is calculated as follows: Area within individual lots: 177,600 s.f. Area within play area Outlot B: 8,583 s.f Area within road Outlot C: 21,495 s.f. Area within road Outlot D: 30,617 s.f Area within wetland buffer adj. to Block 2: 28,000 sf. Total calculable area: 266,295 s.f = 6.11 ac. Trunk Fee: 6.11 acres x $8,490/acre = $51,874.00. Page 17 of 19 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6655 L. Park Dedication The City Code requires dedication of 8% of the land as public park, or payment of the equivalent value in cash. The City Council has determined there is no need for dedication of land from the proposed development. Therefore, payment of the standard Park Dedication fee for 27 new building lots will be required; the current fee ranges from a minimum of $3,250 and a maximum of $5,550 per lot, for a potential total fee of $87,750 to $149,850.* The Park Dedication Fee is due at the time of final plat approval. * As of the date of this writing, the City Assessor has not established a fair market value for the property pre -development. The figures shown reflect the minimum and maximum potential amount of the Park Fee. M. Sewer and Water Connection Charges. Municipal sewer and water utilities are planned to be extended in 2017 to serve development at this site and properties Rirther east. Based on the estimated costs of construction of the extensions and apportioned between the three properties expected for future development, preliminary connection charges for the applicants' site are estimated at $307,878 for municipal water and $220,567 for municipal sanitary sewer. These amounts will be due and payable at the time of final plat approval. 4. This General Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat approval is based upon the known issues that may affect this project, but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. 5. This General Concept Plan Approval resolution approves the development concept subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of this resolution and all other requirements of the City. This resolution does not constitute approval of the rezoning. Such approval shall only be considered when the City Council finds that all "Conditions for Development Plan Approval" as identified herein have been met. 6. This General Concept Plan Approval shall be effective -until -Syl-y 25"(' , 2017 per the provisions of Zoning Code Section 78-628. If General Development Plan and Final Plat Approval is not granted by that date, the terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole discretion may extend this effective period. Page 18 of 19 ATTEST, CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL N 0— 6655 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this Z -���dday of J U L'y' ,2016. i& la PC hJI& 0 — Lili Tod McMillan,Mayor Tiegs, City Applicant (for Lakewest LLC) STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of 2016, by - the of Lakewest LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public Page 19 of 19 RESOLUTION NO. 6655 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRUMON OF PRFMSES: Government Lot 1, Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of U.S. H�glwvay No. 12 described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection ofthe Sodh line of US. Hi&vay No. 12 with the East fine of said Section 32; theme South along said East line 393.24 ket; dience West at right angjes 418 feet: thence deflectirig right 90 degrees 3 92.02 fixt to the South line of U. S. I-Egtiway No. 12 at a point 418 feet West of the point of begiming; thmee, East 418 feet to the point ofbegiiining. ALSO the East 418 kd ofthat part of said Lot I which lies betw= the South line of U.S. Highway No. 12 and the center line of said Highway. ALSO commencing at a poin't in the East line of Government Lot I in S ection 3 2, Townslip 118 North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, dis= 393.24 feet South along said line ofthe South line of State Highway No. 12; thence at rig)l angles West from said East line 418 fee� thence at n& angles North 392.02 fimt to the S outh line of said HoTway, and thence C011f3nuing North to the onginal center line of said Highway thence West along said onginal center line of said Highway to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along said WeA line tD the Northerly fine of the right of way of the GreatNorthem. Railway Company; thence Southeasterly along said ri& ofway line to the East line of said Lot 1; thence North to the poirA of beginning, EXCEPT Parcel I I of Minnesota Department of Transportation. Right of Way Pla No. 27-13 0. 665 5 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT B PLAN SHEETS (Attached) B I - Plan Sheet I of 12 — Cover Sheet dated 07-18-2016 B2 - Plan Sheet 2 of 12 — Existing Conditions dated 07-18-2016 B3 - Plan Sheet 3 of 12 — Preliminary Plat dated 07-18-2016 B4 - Plan Sheet 4 of 12 — Preliminary Plat (enlarged) dated 07-18-2016 B5 - Plan Sheet 5 of 12 — Preliminary Sewer & Water Main Plan dated 07-18-2016 B6 - Plan Sheet 6 of 12 — Preliminary Street & Storm Sewer Plan dated 07-18-2016 B7 - Plan Sheet 7 of 12 — Preliminary Grading Plan dated 07-18-2016 B8 - Plan Sheet 8 of 12 — Preliminary SWPPP dated 07-18-2016 B9 - Plan Sheet 9 of 12 — Preliminary Tree Inventory Plan dated 07-18-2016 B 10 - Plan Sheet 10 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B I I - Plan Sheet 11 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B 12 - Plan Sheet 12 of 12 — Details dated 07-18-2016 B 13 - Planting Plan L- 1 — Trees (undated) B 14 - Planting Plan L-2 — Shrubs (undated) B 15 - Planting Plan L-3 — Cross Section & Details (undated) B 16 - Planting Plan — Aerial (undated) B 17 - Streetscape B 18 - Home Layouts B 19 - House Plan A Elev & Floor Plans B20 - House Plan B Elev & Floor Plans B21 - House Plan C Elev & Floor Plans B22 - Trail Plan dated 03-23-2016 CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. EISINGER MEADOWS ORONO, MN 0 C401 Engineeft 0 Land Planning low pww cre* codw. P.C. Bw 249 Me PM% ktN 55= phple wm 793 -47G -M72 Fee 763-479-4242 E -VA or npmt hm been - 1, by no or wWw my - , m*sr"m &W Vot I MUM =do:;;= �&i~ 4 %mw at 0 PROJECT LOCATION EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN PROJECT DIRECTORY L#= wur evomApmw JIM OW FRE710M 14= HWWW 7. 8111117M M Immiloomm w SSW "t OL83113m MML. mumommmam armlimmemn sumcm mc AM MAW cumpm 1111= P10"m CFM cwm "'LE w OMM SE PM 7 J171 11144", MAIL— noleacuum iwa mwwm w- Xm W= jp� Am 1 40 K WUM DME UM LAM MIN W= Plit, 2MA7&4141 BWL. Mmum mm- WLINDW AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORIPATION PER SUW4Ey PREPARED By GMERQ & ANOCINFES, DATED — GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. TKE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA71ON 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION7 LATEST ED17ION & SUPPLEMUM 2- CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIA71ON OF MINNESOTA (CEAm) STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS. (LATEST EDITION) 3, ALL APPUCABLE FEDERAL. STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCE VALL 13E COMPUED VATH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 4, CITY OF ORONO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS. COVER SHEET SHEET NO. 1 OF 12 SHEETS ECT NO: 15-039 16 LEGEND a= MICNAM FOM NOTE DOSTING CONDMONS SURVEY PREPARED BY GRONEIERG & ASSDCIATES LMAL DESCRIF11ION OF PRONSIES: Gavemmorit Lot 1, Socft 32, Township 119, RorW 23. Hannon Counly, Minnesota. V" south of US. Kghway No. 12 descritied an folm: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South Ine of U.S. Highway No. t2 with the East One of add Section 32; them South along add East fim 393.24 feet; thence Wed at eight angko 418 feet thence deflocUng t go d 322M fed to thsSouth One of ML Noway 1%.,12 at a point 416 feet Woot of the poK of begiiining; thence East 419 fed to the point of begMing. XW the East 4115 feet of ft of id Lot I which thes between the South Ina of ZhMM %. 12 .6 the center One of said highway. AM commencing at a point In the East Om of Ommmord Lot I 1, Section 32, Towniship I IS NorM, R -W 23 West of the ft P&dpal MeMian, distant 393.24 fed South clong said One of the South ffne of State Kighway No. 12; therm at right origin West from sold East Eno 418 fact them at right "We North 302.02 feet to the South Ins of mid Highwar. and thence cmUn*q North to the original conter One of said Wqhw* thence West aWq sold original center Ins of oak HIghway to the Wed he of said Lot 1, thence So& along odd West rim to the 1= ins of the right of way of the Groot Kom" Raftay camory . to" Southeast" al -g =ad rWA of way Ins to the East Im of add Lot 1; thence A. the point of begirintrig, EXCOT P..W 11 of Milmosoto Department of Tramporlbotiort Fight of Way Plot No. 27-131 � E&Ung contours a Inm marker set Iron marker found ExisWV cwftur 11m, Bmirfriga shown we bond upon an assumed dakum This survely show the boundaries of the above dsscrflie�! property, the location of an vidating house arid 2=ge therom and the location of major sideting true, and topography of a portion of the property. Other topa b*nnadw is from Herin. Co. webaft. H: dom not purport to ohm any ~ improvements or ornmehments. NM- The porUm of tho praperty muthody and westerly of We westerly driveway has had topography added from the Hennepin County Natural Resources webolts. 6 -S 5i Wasi !Ina a! Gov't Lot 1 r.c. 32-118 , 23 based on SB MC 13 being lost -1jernoins of WEMTLAND z ust 4ne of sac 32 MC J �eellg A 994'gF4 9�94.82 5B 10 20 7 994.07 11� P v.2--'aL.�- U1111.11TY POLE AGUM AM MASS LANE M HYDRA11IT I bus" ow" 111-t 11111111 Ph% spodficaum i or rqmt h- b— I F" by — - urAw my ~ w*nvWm OW Iliat I an a duly Nomsed Plaremig 18111111ne- urwer, the wn of as State Of isviewtIL j�� -11.110. Li 112�=Dd�c� 021111A CWMUR O%VDM VW .-993.67 VAIERNINN SANITAKY 117 El SH STM SUM —X—X—X— EIIIIISININIS F Z X1011.2 EMB113116 IMMIM U& sailines MAIM1111111C METEIIIIAM Im SM ME11ERAW 1101FREENTS IM TAQQ0 TW NUMINIM FRO&I A TM ffV0f=Y SUPKM TO US FROMI OUR CLIENT. — — — — — — comw & uriluTv, MEOW SUBCK U1143 WErLMM BL*M AM VIETILM 111PAM AM WL am" 11 CATCH DAM 0 SANITARY SEM MANHOIZ P&M PW AM OVEIDWAD VIM FEWE QUVM CONCIRETIE SWAM GWIL NOTE DOSTING CONDMONS SURVEY PREPARED BY GRONEIERG & ASSDCIATES LMAL DESCRIF11ION OF PRONSIES: Gavemmorit Lot 1, Socft 32, Township 119, RorW 23. Hannon Counly, Minnesota. V" south of US. Kghway No. 12 descritied an folm: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South Ine of U.S. Highway No. t2 with the East One of add Section 32; them South along add East fim 393.24 feet; thence Wed at eight angko 418 feet thence deflocUng t go d 322M fed to thsSouth One of ML Noway 1%.,12 at a point 416 feet Woot of the poK of begiiining; thence East 419 fed to the point of begMing. XW the East 4115 feet of ft of id Lot I which thes between the South Ina of ZhMM %. 12 .6 the center One of said highway. AM commencing at a point In the East Om of Ommmord Lot I 1, Section 32, Towniship I IS NorM, R -W 23 West of the ft P&dpal MeMian, distant 393.24 fed South clong said One of the South ffne of State Kighway No. 12; therm at right origin West from sold East Eno 418 fact them at right "We North 302.02 feet to the South Ins of mid Highwar. and thence cmUn*q North to the original conter One of said Wqhw* thence West aWq sold original center Ins of oak HIghway to the Wed he of said Lot 1, thence So& along odd West rim to the 1= ins of the right of way of the Groot Kom" Raftay camory . to" Southeast" al -g =ad rWA of way Ins to the East Im of add Lot 1; thence A. the point of begirintrig, EXCOT P..W 11 of Milmosoto Department of Tramporlbotiort Fight of Way Plot No. 27-131 � E&Ung contours a Inm marker set Iron marker found ExisWV cwftur 11m, Bmirfriga shown we bond upon an assumed dakum This survely show the boundaries of the above dsscrflie�! property, the location of an vidating house arid 2=ge therom and the location of major sideting true, and topography of a portion of the property. Other topa b*nnadw is from Herin. Co. webaft. H: dom not purport to ohm any ~ improvements or ornmehments. NM- The porUm of tho praperty muthody and westerly of We westerly driveway has had topography added from the Hennepin County Natural Resources webolts. 6 -S 5i Wasi !Ina a! Gov't Lot 1 r.c. 32-118 , 23 based on SB MC 13 being lost -1jernoins of WEMTLAND z ust 4ne of sac 32 MC J �eellg A 994'gF4 9�94.82 5B 10 20 7 994.07 11� P v.2--'aL.�- 4 . ............................ IN 88-54*22" W 418.00 WET�AND of HENN. CO. MON. AT E 1/4 COR. OF SEC. 32-118-23 GRIPM ICALE N FEEr AGUM AM MASS LANE Civil Engimaning 0 Land Planning CAMPION IWD FAMW Or" CMrI*. ENGINEERING PA am me SERVICES, INC. ft=7*2 FM I E-46& —ok I bus" ow" 111-t 11111111 Ph% spodficaum i or rqmt h- b— I F" by — - urAw my ~ w*nvWm OW Iliat I an a duly Nomsed Plaremig 18111111ne- urwer, the wn of as State Of isviewtIL j�� -11.110. Li 112�=Dd�c� EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO,MN .-993.67 PROJECT No- 15-039 SH DAlh: 0312312016 In nAV MrDOT ENT. NOTE: ACCES S 66��ROL r LINE ---------- 4 . ............................ IN 88-54*22" W 418.00 WET�AND of HENN. CO. MON. AT E 1/4 COR. OF SEC. 32-118-23 GRIPM ICALE N FEEr AGUM AM MASS LANE Civil Engimaning 0 Land Planning CAMPION IWD FAMW Or" CMrI*. ENGINEERING PA am me SERVICES, INC. ft=7*2 FM I E-46& —ok I bus" ow" 111-t 11111111 Ph% spodficaum i or rqmt h- b— I F" by — - urAw my ~ w*nvWm OW Iliat I an a duly Nomsed Plaremig 18111111ne- urwer, the wn of as State Of isviewtIL j�� -11.110. Li 112�=Dd�c� EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO,MN EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT No- 15-039 SHEET NO. 2 OF 12 SHEETS DAlh: 0312312016 In nAV LEGEND 0 1RQN 11110NUMENr Fam LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. Government Lot 1, Section 32, Tawmddp 115. Raingle 23. Hennepin County. Minnam . Wig south of U.S. Highway No. 12 descritied an follows: Commencing at the point. of Intereaction of the South Ins of U.& Highway No. 12 with the East Ine of said Section 32; than= South d" said East rm 393.24 fast thence West at gh2l oangles 418 Ifest; thence I — .02 th U. = U.S. = ftst to the SCH rNI at point 418 fad West of the point of beginning; thence, East 41a feet to the point of beginning. AIM the East 415 fad of that part of cold Lot I which gas between the South III of UI Highway No. 12 and the center Ina of mid highway. AIM commencing at a Writ In this East Ina of Government Lot I In Section 32, Township I IS North. Range 23 West of the 5th Prinicipal Marldlon, dhftrFt 393.24 fad South along odd Ine of the South Ins or State Highway No. 12; Vionce at right angles Wed from mid Ecat Ina 418 feet 1therice at right angles North 392-02 W to the South line of mid Highway. and thence continuing North to the original center lina all said Highwar, t1wics West along said original center One of mid =Iftway to the Weirt Ine of acrid Lot 1; thence South alcing West line to the Northerly Ine of the right of way of the Gred Northern Railway Company' thence Southeasterly along =Id right of way line to the East be of add Lot 1; thence to the point of beginning. EXCEPT Porcel 11 of Minnesota Department of Transpartation Right of Way Plat 14o 27-130. — Midirting contiours 0 Iran rmrlw set Iran marker found EAstlng contour line Bearings shawn am bond upon an assumed datum Thin survey shows the boundaries of the atim describled I property. the location of an sideft house and garage =. ,it the location of .)or sidatirig Ill., and Wpagrophy of G porl of the property. Other to kdbmxan 113 from Hann. Go. welbeft. R don 2"Purport to show any other Improinoments or ancrwchinefft. NOTE The portion of the prop" soult" and wed" of the westerly driveway has hod topography added from the Hennapin County Natural Resources welosits. N 0 Civil Fnigineering *Land Planning CAMPION law Piie� cmia: ca*w. ENGINEERING PA Bm 2011 0 M Mo PM4 SERVICES, INC. M * 7111M Fm 70-470-4M NEW� Sul W at line of Govt Loi 1, 32-11B-23 bused on " NO 13 being lost .�-rnoins of �.d o!d fence WETLANC wause z W line of Gov'�I- Sec' 32-1 J'I MC 1.3 being pe64;C& IV I or mW him lism limpared by me or undw my dined oupanillelicin aid Od I an a dWzr a Eagimirr N V. =1122= die Lk tom -ji IMA Elam Dow: .......... ......... N BB'54'22" W 418.00 FADWO UIE 4UTE! ACCESS CON71ROL BY VnI)ff- ALONG SOUTH LINE Ay Nunn Los WETLkNO EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO,MN 70TAL PLAT AREA - 30.5 + ACRES WAYZATA BLVD (00 RD 112) ROW - 1.6 ACRES WETLAND AREA - 13.3 ACRES BUFFER AREA - 2.14 ACRES DUSTING ZONING - RR -1113 PROPOSED ZONING - RPUD PROPOSED SETBACKS. 5' FROM LOT LINE 10' FROM WETLAND BUFFER 40' FROM WAYZATA BLVD (00 RD 112) WETLAND DATA MANAGEMENT CLASS - VE BASE BUFFER WIDTH - 7W MINIMUM APPLIED BUFFER WIDTH - 61 APPLIED BUFFER VIDTH - 71' REQUIRED BUEEM AREA : 71' ADJACE)rr TO ALL WETLANDS - 186.434 SF PROPOSED BUFFER AREk. 4V AMWINT TO NORTH PORI'M OF WETLAND AND BW AwAcDff TO s4v & WEST PDRnoN - wax sF DENSITY CALCULA7101ft TOTAL SITE AREA - 30.5 AIC WIIII BLVD (00 RD 112) - 1.6 AC OUTIM A - 24,111 AC NET DBROPABLE AREA - 4,9 AC PROPOSED UNITS - 27 NET DENS11Y - &5 IUNITS/ACRE I WETLANDS DELINEIII BY SVOEOOA EDDLOGICAL RESOURCES. REFER TO REPORT WED: 11/27/2013 HENN, CO. MON. AT E '/4 CQ -R. OF SEC. 32-118-23 =F&=W-T QVJM WALE N FEET PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET NO. 3 OF 12 SHEETS 15-039 6 VMJTY PME FIRE HYDIWT EXI CONTIOUR aVERHEAD UK WAIERMANi SAWARY am ell SEVER -X-X-X- DNMM PENCE xinm2 E96W Ell ig WL WaNe 0 mimm METUt/sm 12 US ILIER/SOX EPRESWM *1E TAGGED YM NUMBER FROM A IFEE KVDM" SUPPLED TO US FROM QUIR cull)(T. — — — — — — DROM & UTIM BMW SEMCK UNES WEILAND BUFFER AM VEFLAND IMP11CFED AREA SCL BaRses 0 CAIM RASN 0 SAII SEWER MANIHOLE -------- U, POM POLE AND OVERNIZAD VARES FENCE 6"!10M CONCRM SURFACE. GRANEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. Government Lot 1, Section 32, Tawmddp 115. Raingle 23. Hennepin County. Minnam . Wig south of U.S. Highway No. 12 descritied an follows: Commencing at the point. of Intereaction of the South Ins of U.& Highway No. 12 with the East Ine of said Section 32; than= South d" said East rm 393.24 fast thence West at gh2l oangles 418 Ifest; thence I — .02 th U. = U.S. = ftst to the SCH rNI at point 418 fad West of the point of beginning; thence, East 41a feet to the point of beginning. AIM the East 415 fad of that part of cold Lot I which gas between the South III of UI Highway No. 12 and the center Ina of mid highway. AIM commencing at a Writ In this East Ina of Government Lot I In Section 32, Township I IS North. Range 23 West of the 5th Prinicipal Marldlon, dhftrFt 393.24 fad South along odd Ine of the South Ins or State Highway No. 12; Vionce at right angles Wed from mid Ecat Ina 418 feet 1therice at right angles North 392-02 W to the South line of mid Highway. and thence continuing North to the original center lina all said Highwar, t1wics West along said original center One of mid =Iftway to the Weirt Ine of acrid Lot 1; thence South alcing West line to the Northerly Ine of the right of way of the Gred Northern Railway Company' thence Southeasterly along =Id right of way line to the East be of add Lot 1; thence to the point of beginning. EXCEPT Porcel 11 of Minnesota Department of Transpartation Right of Way Plat 14o 27-130. — Midirting contiours 0 Iran rmrlw set Iran marker found EAstlng contour line Bearings shawn am bond upon an assumed datum Thin survey shows the boundaries of the atim describled I property. the location of an sideft house and garage =. ,it the location of .)or sidatirig Ill., and Wpagrophy of G porl of the property. Other to kdbmxan 113 from Hann. Go. welbeft. R don 2"Purport to show any other Improinoments or ancrwchinefft. NOTE The portion of the prop" soult" and wed" of the westerly driveway has hod topography added from the Hennapin County Natural Resources welosits. N 0 Civil Fnigineering *Land Planning CAMPION law Piie� cmia: ca*w. ENGINEERING PA Bm 2011 0 M Mo PM4 SERVICES, INC. M * 7111M Fm 70-470-4M NEW� Sul W at line of Govt Loi 1, 32-11B-23 bused on " NO 13 being lost .�-rnoins of �.d o!d fence WETLANC wause z W line of Gov'�I- Sec' 32-1 J'I MC 1.3 being pe64;C& IV I or mW him lism limpared by me or undw my dined oupanillelicin aid Od I an a dWzr a Eagimirr N V. =1122= die Lk tom -ji IMA Elam Dow: .......... ......... N BB'54'22" W 418.00 FADWO UIE 4UTE! ACCESS CON71ROL BY VnI)ff- ALONG SOUTH LINE Ay Nunn Los WETLkNO EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO,MN 70TAL PLAT AREA - 30.5 + ACRES WAYZATA BLVD (00 RD 112) ROW - 1.6 ACRES WETLAND AREA - 13.3 ACRES BUFFER AREA - 2.14 ACRES DUSTING ZONING - RR -1113 PROPOSED ZONING - RPUD PROPOSED SETBACKS. 5' FROM LOT LINE 10' FROM WETLAND BUFFER 40' FROM WAYZATA BLVD (00 RD 112) WETLAND DATA MANAGEMENT CLASS - VE BASE BUFFER WIDTH - 7W MINIMUM APPLIED BUFFER WIDTH - 61 APPLIED BUFFER VIDTH - 71' REQUIRED BUEEM AREA : 71' ADJACE)rr TO ALL WETLANDS - 186.434 SF PROPOSED BUFFER AREk. 4V AMWINT TO NORTH PORI'M OF WETLAND AND BW AwAcDff TO s4v & WEST PDRnoN - wax sF DENSITY CALCULA7101ft TOTAL SITE AREA - 30.5 AIC WIIII BLVD (00 RD 112) - 1.6 AC OUTIM A - 24,111 AC NET DBROPABLE AREA - 4,9 AC PROPOSED UNITS - 27 NET DENS11Y - &5 IUNITS/ACRE I WETLANDS DELINEIII BY SVOEOOA EDDLOGICAL RESOURCES. REFER TO REPORT WED: 11/27/2013 HENN, CO. MON. AT E '/4 CQ -R. OF SEC. 32-118-23 =F&=W-T QVJM WALE N FEET PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET NO. 3 OF 12 SHEETS 15-039 6 I�EGEND I N 0 CIA Enainswing * Lnd Pinn ring CAMPION = RON MONUMorr FOUND U7lLrIY POLE FIFE HYDRANT 2080 VIS -- I CONTOUR .. . ".. ENGINEERING P.O. Ow 249 =PM-M47N95-"517"2 OVU41EAD WRE —I— WAIMAIN 0--> — SANI SCIIIIER >— I n SEVER -X-X-X- IDISIM rENCE SERVICES. INC. Fm 763-476-4M EXISTING ELEVATION. SOL BMW 11I Mrot/oax IM IIAS METEI WE REPRESENTS 1HE TAMED TREE NUIIEER FROM A IREF INVENTORY SUPPLED TO LIS FROM OUR CLINF. — — — — — — CRAI * unm DSEMBIT 03/23/2016 SEMACK LIMS PROYM WMAND NPER AM WELAND IMIIAWED ATA SOL 0=0 0 CATCH BASIN 6 SANITARY SEEN MANHOLE POLE AND OVERHEAD INNES GRAVEL CONCRETE MWACE GRAVEL E01 TREE LPE ------ >— PROPM LIE &AMI RE E WoRm SIMI WMER MAIN GDECIDUOUS SHIW TOM DECI SHIM PROPOSED CONTOUR %ml.2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION. SANrrARY SMM & W&UMN NOI 1. ALL PVC WATERMN SHALL BE AWWA C -90D OR C-905 ORIS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2- ALL PVC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE Nolm. 3. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4' PVC SCHEDULE 40. 4. WATER SERVICES SHALL HE 1* TYPE '%� COPPER WITH 1" CORP. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL HYDWW DITENSIONS AS NECESSARY WI WM HAS BEEN LOWERED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH OTHER UTILIT� DITENSIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO HYDRANT COST. & ALL SERVICES SHALL BE DITENDED 10' BEYOND PRDPERIY LINE 7. ALL KYORANTS AND VALVES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS CORE BLUE OR EQUIVALENT FLIMEARBON COATED BOLTS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATERMAIN ITMNGS. & ALL DIP WM WLL BE POLY WRAPPED "M 8 ML POLY AND POLY TAPED AT ALL JOINTS. S. ALL PVC & HOPE WATERMN & ALL SERVICES SHALL BE LAID WITH TRACER WIRE PER CITY STANDM DEIAIL PLATES. 11. NUALL HYDRANTS 5 FEEr BIMIND CURB. 12. 6" OR ir HYDRANT 017ENSIONS ONLY. IF HYDRANT EXTENSIONIS ARE USED, rATE VALVE NUT DITENDM WILL BE REQUIRED. PLUI Rw* HE MIS --A 1 07 MR ADOM ADD AM LANE & BYPASS LANF N 0 CIA Enainswing * Lnd Pinn ring CAMPION = T, X, III EISINGER MEADOWS PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & PROJECT NO: .. . ".. ENGINEERING P.O. Ow 249 =PM-M47N95-"517"2 undw my drect wAw%Wm wA that I an a thttokwoW a W EnOws, of Ufr;9,:b wido ef Mb ... t. LAKE WEST, LLC WATERMAIN PLAN 15-039 NO. VAIE SERVICES. INC. Fm 763-476-4M WE E -*c& -- *1, ft-oplIons. Morkin P. 2M& -Lk-..I Datr ORONO,MN IMF SHEET NO. 5 OF 12 SHEETS 03/23/2016 0 gwo", INS rig OZONE! PLUI Rw* HE MIS --A 1 07 MR ADOM ADD AM LANE & BYPASS LANF N 0 CIA Enainswing * Lnd Pinn ring CAMPION = ' weey wroy um wo P10% *� or rqwt has bw p P_ - by me or EISINGER MEADOWS PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & PROJECT NO: .. . ".. ENGINEERING P.O. Ow 249 =PM-M47N95-"517"2 undw my drect wAw%Wm wA that I an a thttokwoW a W EnOws, of Ufr;9,:b wido ef Mb ... t. LAKE WEST, LLC WATERMAIN PLAN 15-039 NO. VAIE SERVICES. INC. Fm 763-476-4M WE E -*c& -- *1, ft-oplIons. Morkin P. 2M& -Lk-..I Datr ORONO,MN SHEET NO. 5 OF 12 SHEETS 03/23/2016 CALL 40 HOLM Tm Cariffy MIL TOLL FREE LEGEND I > - PROPOSED SANITARY SEINEIt >>- PROPOW STORM SEWER PROPOSED WAIERHAIR MOPOSED CmrIOtIR Dloom SFW ELEVATION. VVA Y LA I A bLVIJ ------ — I -04 -A i. CONSTRU07M SHALL, COMPLY WON ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING ODOM I THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTKM NECESSARY TO MOD PROPERTY DAMAX TO AIMACENT PROPERI ES DURM M CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR a -W.0 AMY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES RNM cumo THE cominvicimm PK4SES OF THE PROJECT -V-N7.3 THE CONMACTOR MUST CONTACT AM APPROPRIXM UTLITY C06MMES AT LEAST 46 HOURS BEFORE ANY jl� L EWA= To REQUI UAL7 FIELD LOCATON OF DOSTING UTILITIES. rr WALL BE THE RESPONS111BILIff OF 7HE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL UTLMM WHICH COWl= WITH THE PROPOSED IM14150YOMM SHOWN ON THE PLAML THE LOOM04 OF SMALL UTIIJFIES SHALL BE 067AINED BY THE CDRrRACrOR BY CALUNG GOPHER STATE CALL (11-1100-252-111M). WIE Mmm To Cwmwnm IN ACCORDANCE WITH OENERALLY ACCEPTED C006TRUCTION PRWIMES THE CONTRAMOR WILL BE SOLECY AM COMPLETELY RENWISISIX FOR CONDITIONS ON THE 409 STE- INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONIS AM PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THIE WORK. THE REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY EDF -M" CommucumY AM wr BE Uwm To NORM WORKING HouRL THE Duff OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER To CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION RBREW OF THE CORMACTOR'S PERFORMANCE 15 Wt INTENDED TO INCLUDE AMEN OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE OONTRACTIOWS SAFETY MOLVAES IN. ON OR NEAR m coNgmwnoN wE & THE COMMA" SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MMWMM TRAFFE CONTROL DEVICM WON AS wpwADM wumm sOM DIRECTIONAL SOM FLAGMEN AM LIGHTS TO CONTROL. THE MO%WdUff OF TRAFM WHERE NE=gw. TRAFM CONTROL. DEVIM SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORENNICK STANDARDL L THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MUMICI ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTINCTIES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE 1HE CONSTRUCIM BOUNDARIES INCLUDL ON ARE MOr LIMTED III: pLANS, ACnW= PROHIBITED OUTSIDE STOWILING SOILS AND UMM MATERIAL. smoN EQUFMW OR 01HEFt MACHINEW. OWING VOW -EL LEAKM OR SPILLING OF ANY -VANSHOLM' OR OMER TOM MATENALS. SM ENOINEM THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE 7. ALL sm TESTING SMALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNERPS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING; ALL REQUIRED SOIL 1131 AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOLS ENGINEER. 8. PRm To PU%CEMENT Of ANY STRUCTM OR PMEMEN'r. A TEST ROLL WU BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET I M MR SUBaRADE. ImE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMDE A TANDEM AXLE TRUCK VM A WEIGHT Of 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING s(ALL BE AT THE DIMM OF THE 900 ENGINEER AND SMLL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED fff im s= ENMEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHMLL DETERMINE WHICH SECM= OF 7KE AM UWABLE, CopRECTICNI OF THE SUBGRADE WILS SIALL BE COMPLETED IN ACDORDANCE WITH THE FMM13MO OF THE SMS ENGINEER AM AS SPECIFIED. III, THE SITE HAS NOT NECIESSARLY BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANM THE ON-SITE MATERIALL AFTER THE SITIE GRADING 0 SOL MATERIAL, BOTTOM OF COMPLETE, IF SOL MATERIAL DuM THE CDNTRW= SRALL DEPOSE OF ALL OFF -SM IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE RERU7M AGENCIES, mmym TO. THE EMIING TOPSOIL ON THIS SITE VARIES IN oEpm rr IS THE CONTRCTOR's REN"MuTy TPAT ALL SURFACE VEIZOIXION AND ANY TOPSOIL. OR OTHER LODSE, SOFT OR MERWISE UNSWABLE MATERIAL. BE REMOVED FROM HWL-4811.3 THE STREET AND BUILDING PAD AREAS TO PLACEMENT OF MY EMBANKMENT IN ACCORDANCE AITH Me SDILS 7w CFom REPORL 11. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE STREET. STREET RIGHT -W -WAY OR BUILDING PAD AREAll SHALL BE 967,0 COMPACTIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RMUMMERM Or THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD As OUTLINED IN MN/007 210&M OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS 04MM 12. EWk%MM FOR THE PLIRPOSE: OF REMOVVIG LWSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOLS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REZJIRED By THE SOILS; EwMNEE3L EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN 714E STREEIS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE MTH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED. IN MN/b0T 21OL3FI. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLAM IN THE BUILDING PAD AM sHALL BE cOmPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOU RgKffr. OUrLOrr A I& TOLERANCES: STREET SUgGR= FINISHED SURFACE ELEvADON SHALL Wr VARY BY MORE THAN 0 05 FWT AMM OR *AREAS :THE (LTC FOOT BEIM, THE PRESCRIBED El"ATION OF ANY POINT WNW MEASUREMENT IS MADE, WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE 1OPSOIL SMALL BE GRADED TO VMN OM RW ABOVE OR OEM THE REQUIRED ELIEVA110% UNLESS DIRECIED BY THE DQMEER� TOPSOL SHALI. BE MM TO PLUS OR MINUS; 'A INCH OF THE SPOMM THtCKNESL 14. ALL Dunxmm ummfi*%= AREAS ARE M IMMEDIATELY RECEVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL. SEED AND MULCH AND BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GROW 4 OBTAINED. I& SM nZaTioNs SHOWN imKATE FINISHED GRADE ELE01ION UNI crTHERWISE NOTED. I& PROPOSED CDwmuRs ARE TO FOSHED SURFACE GRACE OR GUTTER LOW! F CUREI. PLAN GRADE IS TO FINISHED GARkgE FLOW eLeAmm DOSTINO coMTuURS ARE SHOW AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. ALL PROPOSED CONTDLIFIS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FWr INTERYPLIL 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL AMIST ANQ/OR OUT COSTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSIARf'rG ASSM A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTIMLIOUS GRAM ALONG MATCHING PXMZNT AREAS AND/OR CURIM I L 1WE CONTRACM SNALL. ASSURE POSffIVE MINAGIE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAM AREM 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DMTERING AS R102UIRM TO COMPLETE THE 911E GRADING CONSTRUCTION Olt AS OIREMW BY II -E SOLE ENGIUM 1, THE UPPER 2dr IN ALL PONDS smALL CONSIST OF A WELL BLENOM HOMIOGBMOUS; MDITLIRE OF 50 - GOS SAND. 20-M Top SOL. AND 2D-= ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST. THE INDIVIDIAL CDMIPOWFMM SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; AsAND - SAM SHALL BE CLEAN. FREE OF DELETERIIOW MATERIAIS, MEETING AASHTD " Olt ASTM O -W WITH A GRAIN UM OF D.Ol--O.W ' ELTOPSOIL - TOPSOIL SHALL, CONSIST OF SANDY LM, LOAMY SAND. OR LOAM MITURE PER USDA TEXTUFtAL TRIANGLE ON LESS THAN 5X CLAY CONTENT, CjDmw LDF c0mPOffr - ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST $HALL MEET THE REDUIREMEM OF' MNDOT GRADE L 2, THE coNTRc= WALL MID COMPACTING THE POND BOTTOM RUBBER TAM EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROHIBITED WHEN WORKING IN THE POND AREk 3. THE BOTTOM AND SIDE sLOM SPALL BE STABILIZED WITH 7HIE SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIALS WffHN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETING THE P13NO GRADIbr- POND SHALL Be GRADIED 12" - 16' ABOVE FINAL GRADE UNTIL SITE GRADING M SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE To pL4= D"mmw sDLL NATIVE SOLS; IN THE POND SMALL BE DE-COMPACTEI) TO A DEPTH OF 12' - iff'- CONMICFM 15 SPOMFICALLY CALITIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/Olt ELEMATK)M OF mwnme uTLmm As wm WESE MANS 6 EASED ON RECORDS OF THE %ARIOW UTILITY COMPANIES AND. WHERE PON" MEASURE)"M X IN THE FELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELJED ON AS BEIM DIAGF OR COMPLEM CONTROC11OR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 40 HOURS BEFORE ANY E)=ffiTION EQUEST C(ACT FW LOCATION OF UTILITIEL IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF II -E CONTRACTOR M RELOCATE Dam uwnEs WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SMWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF Z UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GDP"ER MTE ONE CALL AT 900-252-1196 OR -454-OWL 07ASIM BEST N= AM ItION LANE A UMASS LAW N CNI Engimed"g m '-wd PUnning 11mmu CAMPION I= Pw� Crmk CNAW, or rqwt hm urodw my dW ENGINEERING P.O. 0= zo I an a ady I I I www 04 In SERVICES, INC. Pb*.8 PMZ4r72 Fcz 7&3-470-4M Unrnm P- emn me air EISINGER MEADOWS tm X~..ML LAKE WEST, LLC Ddw I ORONO.MN GUM WAE N PaT PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SHEET NO. 7 OF 12 SHEETS 15-039 1. ALL EROSION CONFROL MD SLIATION CONTROL WILL COMPLY WITH MINNEMAS BEST MARAMENT PRACTICES MANUAL MID REMUTIONS OF THE CITY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAIMLIAR WITH AND FOLLOW ALL REWIMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PKk9E 0 POW FOR CONST11526014 ACNITIES INCWDING BUT NOT LIMITED 70- WEEKLY EROSION CONTROL iNwwnDNS. INSPSCM AFTER 03" RAINFALL OR MORE AND DOCUMENTATION OF ALL CORRECTIVE MEASUREL BY BORNIIING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THE TERMS OF THIS PERU AND AGIIIEES TO ABIDE BY THEM. 3. THE OONTRAiCTDR SHALL PERFORM ANY CDRRSCTW MEASURES ORDERED BY THE CRY, THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE MPCA WRHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. ALSO. ADmnow EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DOMED NECESSARY BY EVER THE CITY, THE WATERSHED DISTIIIICT OR THE MPCA SMALL BE INUALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. 4. ANY DEPOSITING OF SIT OR MUD ON MON OR E)b-W PAfEM1Nr. IN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION SAM, OR IN DOSTING SM SEWERS OR 3WALn SHALL BE RnKNM ARM EACH RNN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED. 5. THE COKTRCM SHALL ASSM COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION INCLLIOING Ba NOT LWITED 70 STAKED MRAW BAI ES ROCK ENTIWCES ANO/OR MIT FENCES. CONTROL, 94ALL COMMENCE WITH GRACING AND CONTINUE THROUGHDIJT THE PROJECT UNM ACCE171ANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNEIL THE OONFRAC710n RESPONSIBILITY MMUDES ALL DESIGN AND IMPLE100TION AS REOUIRED TO PRMff EROSION AND THE DEPOSITINGI OF SIT. THE OWNER MAY. AT HtS/HER OMION DOW THE CONTRWM IN HISA/IIER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROW PROPERTY AND NPWAMENTS. S. ANY OEPOSITINIQ OF SILTIN SWALES SHALL BE RBWKD AFTER EACH RAN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED 70 114E SATISFACTION OF THE OWNEIL ALL AT THE OPENSE OF THE COKnVCM THE SILT FDCES SHALL BE REMOIIIED AND THE SILT ROWED FROM THE PONDIW AREAS BY THE CONTRACTOR! AFTER THE TURF 5 ESIABLISHED. 7. THE CONTRA= SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AND MONITORING THE REWJREMEKT OF THE MPCA PERMIT. L ALL DISTURBED AREAS. DOW RONDWAYS. BUILDING AWA% PARKING AREAS, ISLANDS MD SIDEWALK %KL BE RESTORED WITH A MWIMLIM I, INCHES TOPSOIL. SEEDED AND MULCHED CM q WMIN 72 HOURS OF CDMKEFIDN OF SITE GRADING, OR WITHIN 14 DAYS AFrER THE CONSTRUCTIO111 ACTNff IN THAT PORTION OF 1HE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY CEASE11 SEEOM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IMOT PEOFICATION 21175. SEED MIX 150 0 40 Lffi/ACRE (OR APPWM EQUAL� DORMANT SEEDING AREAS SHIALL BE SEEDED NO MULCHED IN ACCORWICE WITH MNDOT SPEOMTIONS. SMAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL W TWO TONS PER ACRE. FERTILIZER (10-10-20) SMALL BE APPLIED AT A WE OF 2DD POUNDS PER ACRE (CAN BE OMITTED IN LANDSCAPED AREAS IF LANDSCAPED SEEDING IS DONE CONCLIRROMY). 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUOM- &CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEWLE A PRE-CONSTRUCTK)N MEErING WITH THE Cffr b.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NO ROCK CONSTRUCTION! ENTRANCL o-�RWALL TREE PROTEMION FENCING. &CONTACT CITY AND VIITERSHEO DISTRICT FOR APPRDV& OF OWN CONTROL INSTALIATION AND TREE PROTECTION FENCIWL e.CONSTRUCr TEWPORAItY SEDIMENTATION PONDS AND INSTALL TEIIIPORW OUTFALL WITH STANDPIPE. f CDNSTRUr.7 TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DITCHES/SWALES/MRM San 70 DNERT SURI'Am RUNOFF70 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION PONDS. UAINTAN EROSION MEASURE. I.E. SMT FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION PONDS. COMPLETE SITE GRAIDIND TOLEIRANCING. L INSTALL SEED AND MULCH ON AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE HARD SLWACES- 1G. SLM PROTECTION MD EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE DONE IN ACCOROAiNCE WITH SOMION 023MI SLOPE PWMCTION, EROSION CONTROL AND STM WATER POLIAM PKVENTION PLAIN OF THE PROJECT MANUAL 11. ALL STORM SENOt WLETS AND FIAIM END SWTIONS SHALL BE ADEQUAMMY PROFECTED SO AND AFTER PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED CDNTRA= SHALL PLACE MIRAFI FABRIC AND GRWEL CNER ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLEIS UNIN. PAYM SURFACES ARE PNED AM THE LANDSCAPING 5 COMPLETEIL 12. STOCKPILE AREAS WHICH ROM ON THE SITE FOR MORE THAN SM DAYS DOLL BE SEEDED. MUU>ED, AND SURF40UHM BY SILF FENCE 11 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMMAIM PONDS. AT LOCATION SELECTED BY OWNER 94U BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE INITIAL GIRADING. THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REIXWM FROM THESES PONDS, AS NECESSARY, PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE PROJWr- 14. BID LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PIPE INLETS MD OUTLETS UKnL RIPRAP IS INSTALLED. PVWXERT ENERGY DISSFAMtS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS Or CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 15. MIALL SIT FROE AROUND POND UPON COMPLETION OF GRADIML I& EROSION AND SMENT OGWTRDL PRACTICES MOT RIMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE WA70MO DISTRICT HAS DETERMINED THA6T THE SITE SOILS KWE KEN PERMANOMY STABILIZED AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. 17. ALL STOCKPILES OF SM OR OTHER MATERIALS SUBJECT TO EROSION BY WIND OR WATER SHALL BE C04RED, VMAJED. ENCLOSED, FENCED ON THE DOWN GRADIENT SIDE Olt OTHERWISE EFFECTNELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE Amom OF TIME THE MATERIAL WILL BE ON SrFE AND THE MANNER OF ITS PROPOSED USL IL THE CONTRACTOR SMALL N07IFY THE WAfERSHM DISTRICT AT THE FOLLOWING INTERWM ON COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL& ON COMPLETING LAND-DISTURIM ACTIIMM AND PUTTW INTO PLACE MMIRES FOR FINAL SOL STABLIZA71ON AND REVEGE[ATION. CjWWEN DEWATERING WILL ODCW H 0 WHEN THE SrFE HAS BEEN PERIMEN&Y STABILIZED AND RE -VEGETATED. E)WHEX ALL TINPORW EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS HAVE BEEN REIMED FROM THE SITE 1. EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL. PRACTICES SHALL BE USED DURING BUFFER VEGMTICN ESTAKISHIIIENT. 2. DISTURBED BUFFER ARM SOIL BE PLANTED WITH STATE SEED MD( 35-641 OWISIt U5) Olt EQUNRANT 1. TEMPORARY EROSION MIkrS SHALL BE MODEGRADABLE DOLILBE-NET SMAW (NORTH AWxERIQAN GREEN 5`151) OR APPROVED EQUAL) AND EROSION MATS SMALL HAVE A MINUM FUNCTIONAL. LONGIVITY OF 10 MONTHS. 2. PERMANENT ERDSK)N CONTROL MAT SHALL BE ENKAIIAT 7010/7015 OR APPRM EQUAL AND SHALL BE COW= WITH TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MAT AFTER TOPSOIL AND SEEDING. 3. EROSION MA75 RACED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER SMALL BE ROLLED DOWN SLOPE AND WITH 4" MINMLIM LAP AND STAPLED AT I* D.C. 4, CONSTRUCT A 5"XIX' ANCHOR TRENCH X BEfOKD CREST AND TOE OF SLOM STAPLE EROSION WT IN TRE14CH AT V O.C. MEN MIA WAYZATA B[-VLY- -4� - 7 IT LL= 137.0 ow "A" qb c ourLar A 6 CIYII Erigl�flng 9 Lww Hawing I h -by em" flat thim 0m. qwdftffW ar rWort hm bwi propomd by me or CAMPION low Pl� ere* cwrtw, undw my I — w*wvMm srW Owt ENGINEERING PA I= 20 a dtimmW Milrow V. ojl= to PM I of Mb. t.. SERVICES, INC. N * — —1470=2 awn FA& 7=998.3 121 LL=959,5 & ME '�gaa- , 11 am."s 4� ourLar A 6 CIYII Erigl�flng 9 Lww Hawing I h -by em" flat thim 0m. qwdftffW ar rWort hm bwi propomd by me or CAMPION low Pl� ere* cwrtw, undw my I — w*wvMm srW Owt ENGINEERING PA I= 20 a dtimmW Milrow V. ojl= to PM I of Mb. t.. SERVICES, INC. N * — —1470=2 awn -- - I v 4�b 5P 12 FA& 0FA 121 & ME '�gaa- , 11 am."s -- - I v 4�b 5P 12 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT ATTH- CURT FIRETHAM i4ii mimmy-7. surrE 265 MINNETONKA. MN 55345 PH. 952.930-11000 EMAIL:- CtJMMLMM=M amm-DEma CAMPM ENGINEEIRING SWCES, INC. MARTY CAMPION 1800 PIOINEER CRM CENVER MAPLE PLAIN. MN 55359 PHONE (763) 470-5172 EMAIL AICAMPKINOCAMPIONEN&COM AD PH CONTRIACTOR NAME CONTACT. LEGEND, ADDRESS: PHONE ROW OUNMUMM DMWiM 'SLT FD= wo .................. ERIDSM CONTM BLAI#ff MOSION CONTROL CUMUE& 9TE RENCIRATIC14 - 8 AC SILT WE - 345150 IF v INLET PROTECTION - 10 EA ROCK. bONMR=ON ENTRANCE I EA `k 810 -UM - 5 U I I Eft'01MN CONTROL mmKu - am sF EISINGER MEADOWS PRELIMINARY STORM WATER LAKE WEST, LLC POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ORONO,MN SHEET NO. 8 OF 12 SHEETS 15-039 6 FA& ;. -, 121 & ME '�gaa- , 11 am."s 4� L . . . . . . . ...... LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT ATTH- CURT FIRETHAM i4ii mimmy-7. surrE 265 MINNETONKA. MN 55345 PH. 952.930-11000 EMAIL:- CtJMMLMM=M amm-DEma CAMPM ENGINEEIRING SWCES, INC. MARTY CAMPION 1800 PIOINEER CRM CENVER MAPLE PLAIN. MN 55359 PHONE (763) 470-5172 EMAIL AICAMPKINOCAMPIONEN&COM AD PH CONTRIACTOR NAME CONTACT. LEGEND, ADDRESS: PHONE ROW OUNMUMM DMWiM 'SLT FD= wo .................. ERIDSM CONTM BLAI#ff MOSION CONTROL CUMUE& 9TE RENCIRATIC14 - 8 AC SILT WE - 345150 IF v INLET PROTECTION - 10 EA ROCK. bONMR=ON ENTRANCE I EA `k 810 -UM - 5 U I I Eft'01MN CONTROL mmKu - am sF EISINGER MEADOWS PRELIMINARY STORM WATER LAKE WEST, LLC POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ORONO,MN SHEET NO. 8 OF 12 SHEETS 15-039 6 v X X X X X X X i X X X X X CAMPION WAYZATA I rtw=7 mrMy mm; ME plum ' or rWort bm bm F p - by me or ENGINEERING low phoom, Orw* Colter. PA Sm 2U ndur my dkmt uipm Mm mW Owt M ='IM7955172 lu d Fj*— UrAw 4*7t Ml...t. th.l. SERVICES, INC. Fm 763-470-4M E-*vk im ipl, Amrnphnwomm UwHft P- ft I -Lle- A 12= oat& X X X X X X X i X X X X X CAMPION 0 CUP: Engineedng 0 Lmd Planring I rtw=7 mrMy mm; ME plum ' or rWort bm bm F p - by me or ENGINEERING low phoom, Orw* Colter. PA Sm 2U ndur my dkmt uipm Mm mW Owt M ='IM7955172 lu d Fj*— UrAw 4*7t Ml...t. th.l. SERVICES, INC. Fm 763-470-4M E-*vk im ipl, Amrnphnwomm UwHft P- ft I -Lle- A 12= oat& EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN OVA= XCME N PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PROJECT NO' PLAN 15-039 DATE: HEET NO. 9 OF 12 SHE; --:'TS 03/23/2016 WOOD OR STEEL PENCE wom POSTS: W -V POST MINIMUM v ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS 11. 21V -VrXrGALVANlZ5D Z -V I OMTS d COMPACTED 110-411FILL LCING, I? MAXIMUM WITH VOW LATH A W19MUM WTHICK x 9'"G YnTH WITH CUT WASHERS ell SPAONG. HEAVY OU`TY $7APLES. (CARRM�, WL cm SQJ 0 m#CO%CRErE i LOAD FACTOR Z.3 FILL 57M pam� 2 . e BC+ul 'W DEN CLASS A ir . . . . . . ATTACH FABRICTO POSTS NN Low" - D"ETIEROTO'FlPIRE CDNCRIFTE BACIORILLTI) a W"HINIMUM321PI]ES %VM GRARIULAR INCRIAM (50 LEL Temu) PER POST SHAPmeiamw S --- * w, 1. +. + Of OUTSIDE DIAMETER 711. 4 MNDW SPEC. 314M N TIDP S'OF FASIM OD, 5YEELFCSM' L I POST Nowme$ F,T Ir . 1 mmmc=swam MONCRLAMENT GEUTIECTILE TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC FABRIC PER MNDCITTABLE k 3816�1 (KqCHM Sl=)� 9L ap,07L + + 4L-4f;3�, + 'o FILTER AGGREGATE Bc+Ir MR. IW DENOTES OUTSIDE W4 BUT NOT MNDOT SPEC 3140M MM DIAMETER OF PIPE MACHM SLICE -F LESS THAN 0. 1 WLlr DEFFIR (PLUS V MAP) llmlm�tr LOAD FACTOR 1.9 PIPE FOUNICATION BEDDING IN GOOD SCILS I 'Be DENOTES OUTSIDE CLASS 8 OUVWER OF PIPE 4JFD I ,.SHAPED FROM ANGULM NG MATERM CURB 2r MINIMUM BAOFU MH COMIIACTED ............. RrATW CT1104 WtijO POSTS ...... &%CkTn POST EMBEDMENT 4WXW I L MH T_ 7 %.7 ir + + + + "++ COURSE FILTER AGOREGAT9 + + ++ IWT I'SH MD., SpECr " + AGGIL MNOOT WIE OMDE LOAD FACFOR 1.5 THE BARRICAZ* WAREI EKE SURFACES SHALL IM FULLY RVFLCCrQRldW IN ALTERNATE Z' MEN. DIAMETER OF PIPE SPEC. 31 SjLVEN,WH[TIE AND RED STRIFEW USM A RERBMW SHEETING CoHFORmrQG TO THE I __ THE MACHINE SLICED KEI`HM (TIDE DETAIL) 19 THE STANDARD SILT RBQLJMU4WM OF SEC. 335,IAlk STANOVIRD NO, 1. N RADIUS EB C-1 CUL HAVID SHAPED FROM FIRM . . . I �Ft + PENCE INSTALLATICIII MEnM MILE BK= (ORD -IB) OR HEAVY DUTY -AL) If- I I UNDISTURBED SD3L (ERO-IC) SILT FUNCE 967ALLATMN METHODS SHOULD CK -Y W U= CD I : PRIM To 04TAIM TR. REFLEMVE S�� Tito BaRmArt: MARM SHAU_ BE — — — 7 —, F_ W / /, /, " -,, / " e� --- CATION WHEN APFROVED OR DIRECTED BY THE CITY. GIVEN A COMM =TM OF WIDITIE WOO PRIMER PANT CONFORMING M SPEC. IV 3513� FOULMEC) By AL SECOND COAT OF WHrE GUARD RAL PRINT DDNKWam TO SpBC. 3533 APPLIED ONLY TO THE SURFACES NOT OOVERED WITH RENZCTIVE SHeEnNe. COMPACTED BACKFILL "am. awe FOR CRITICAL ARM AEUAaW TO WETLMDS OR BELOW LONG ANWOR 33 THE BARRr_4DE BOARDS SHALL BE SIlc SUMIES, STEEL POSTS ARE NECESSIMAS INDICATED ON THE I I I -T=.F X APPLIED BEFORE BEING INSCALLMOOMPLETBILY PAIINTED AND REFLECTORIZED SHEETING x i " HUT N COURUMTCRAGNIRCrATE PLAW LES THAN e . . . . . YNOOT. SPEC. 3149H MM THE P OFTME BARRICADE SMALL BE IV -W FRCM THE END OF THE BJCUMINOUS I I (Do—­ ROADLACEHMTENT E Iff FACE LOAD FACTCXt 1.5 WE FOUNDATION A BE=NO IN POOR SOILS AFTER 'SLICW IN THE FAVIRIC AND BEFORE IKSTALLA13CK OF STEEL OR WIT HE BARRICADE CENTERED ONTH RCADEVAYFACENG THE FLOW Of TRAFFIC. i me DEW= OUTSIDE CLASS C-2 VO= POSTS� DRIVE INSTALLATION ETJIPMENT OVER THE -!B"- WHILE I fl� 2. Im DIAMETER OF PIPE HAND SHAPED FROM ANGULAR FABRIC 15 LAYING M THE GACUND. TAW INSTALL THE POSTS AND FULL UP FABRIC TO ATTACH AT A UNIFORM HEIGM. PL CL P1 BEDDINIS MATER14L FIBMPI!! JAN 2M 0 -Vol PERMANENT 0 TYPICAL UTILITY LOCATIONS 2006 0 BEDDING METHODS BEDDING METHODS 0 SILT FENCE Apff 2=.� BARRICADE mATENN (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE) FOR RCP PLATEa FOR VCP, PVC, DIP OR HOPE MACHINE SLICED GEN -4 GEN -2 [Gj��3� (�nl�iw [��l i PLAN PROFILE BERM SrAnIZW WITH MnDOT_\ I. PLAN VIEW 31185 CATEGORY 3 EAMON FILTER ASS13411Y r X -' HORIZONTAL MEMBERS CONTM KAMO:T PIPE 0 CDNTINUMMAKCIUNIDTOPAND AWI-SEEPAiGE 2 POLYESTER SLEEVE WOMEN LATH SHALL BE KAJIED PASTINIED TO EACH POST NOTES, STANCIPTE St ROCIC OOLLAR SBCURrY TO THE P05- MEMBER ZM COMMON NAILS BASIN USED FOR 10 ACRES PIPE F A Ir El TO SECURE LTERFABM DRAINAGE AREA OR MORE. CUTLET DESIGN RUNOFF MONDFULAMENT GBOTEMLE FROM A 2-Yk 24-HIZ STORM A FABRIC AS PER Vh= TABLE So. PER ACRE DRAINED TO THE T MIA 01AICHUNE SI BASIN. BASIN VOLUME MUST s7RUCTURE COVER i VAY a I ADDITIONAL 1,111 OF FFMIC ASSEMBLY BEA MEN. OF 1800 0= '.."..'.S.LCINO RAP AT BOr" OF SM RBE71AME OVERF" wow POSTS, a RmD. SEE PLANWSPECYrATIM FOR WMN IDIPIMISTONS AND DRIVEMY Z-1 PIPE SIZE AND SLOPE. L - VARIABLE WCOD/MULCH- Ir NIINIMUM DEPTH OVERFLOW- LIM OR % // . '.0-AMURIPRAP 11. SECTION A -A v IIELOIN OM M, OUT M3 TWE ED BERM OR APPROVED EQUAL WASH11111 ROCK OR 10 -YR STORM uEOTEffILE FARE Err= $112T PEINCE, WODDCHRPS, WOODIVIIIJUCIR PER OUTLET- M -M PLAN OR GEOMMILt W TO ISOMETRIC VIEW SPECIFICATIONS Toi STANOPIPE-� 3601CLASS 13 Rrp RAP PERIMETER OF ENTRANCE I-IWFABRICFW ld 3 WER MnD(T 3733 MEWING BEYONC) 'WRICIMUNICUrOFFSERM 3 TYPE III GEOTESILE BOTTOM ilk 4� � MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE PIPE FABRIC PULTER ASSENSLY PURY UNDER ROCIC SILT FENCE PROFILE TO PREVENT ANTISEERAGE MUM 90.) POLVESTER SLEEVE NOTIM 1. MnDCIT 3733 TYPE 4 FILTER PAMIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER R= OR MULM To SIT FENCE III. BASIN STANDPIPE AND EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I IJ2'WASHED RM 2, STOP Wm MISRAITION THRCUGH MATERIAL DIRECTIOU DEEP x il MODE FUGITIVE ROOK OR MULCH WILL BE RB40WO " ADJACIRITROADWAYS 9MERGENCYOVERRDW MUCTURE amp NOTES, DAILY OR MC]RE FRISQUIBITLY AS NECESSARY. I OF FLOW 3. DONSTRUC7101i OrrRANM mub7 BE cDhsT&ucrm PRIOR To THE 24' ASSD40LY CONTRACTOR SHALL OONSTRUCT SILT BOX TO FIT HENCENIENT OF GRADING OPERATIOM ON THE UM. CEOrEXTRE FABRIC PER FABRIC. I ft Z.1D E �Aj 111 -YR SIORM FAS -------------------- TOM ENTRANCE MIAT Of MAIPITAINEO bi PROPER CONDITION TO PREVENT PERFORATED A AROlUND THE MEr STRLCWRE WITH 6MDWLN 4. THE PIN r CUE4RAIRCE TO EDGES OF SMMIRE SLT BOX M BE TRACKING OF NUD OFFTHE SFMTHIS P%Y mqtm PERIODIC Tomassm STANOftV ID WITH mmffxxm Rom WOOMMULCH, CA REMOVAL AND REIWALLATION OF CPMW- TOP OF SILT BOX TO bffffiblg� MINIMUM THE PAD, 1r DEAN. ROCK ID ABOVE E)USTING GRADE. 5- THIS ENTRANCE WILL BE USED BY ALL VEHICLES ENTERING OR LEAVING THE CDNEEQUALTDKZ PRIIIECT, "CED"m m EVEN suw",E 6, MUDW On""T"RE UTCK BASIN I, THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE PLCMEK. OF HOLES SIAM BITUMINOUS SURFACINiG. Nom r TO Ir ON CEENTER PIPE mAllurm SHOULD BE RIGED DIAMETEROFSTANDME MACKM SLIMMETHOC. SILT FENCE ...... EQUAL TO DIAMETER OF PIPE 6: � IN-PLACE ELEVATION VIEW i .9-0* : BAD( OF CURB PERI14ETER CONTROL W12M 0 0 INLET PROTECTION, TYPE A INLET PROTECTION, TYPE B APU 2M CDNSTRUCrION ENTRANCE W920133 0 0 Apfll 200B 0 ROCK TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN NO SIDEWALK ROAD DRAIN 2x3 TOP SLAB MODEL SILT BOX - YAM WODD / muLai STANDPDIE OUTLET ER;TC ERO-8B . 0 CiAl Erig!wedng *Land Planning CAMPION I mrwy owmy mm or repwt hom bw =b=7"an EISINGER MEADOWS DETAILS PROLECT NO: ISM FWNW CM* OmatW. ENGINEERING P.D. Ow 2411 =M-04"78=2 undWr my dkm* wipm-dilm mW VmL I am c AtobweW nekww Um at V=114E uroder m mc LAKE WEST, LLC 15-039 SERVICES, INC. I= 70-470-4M SHEET NO. 10 OF 12 SHEETS D-A-T.— 03/23/20 E-%* rnoomm. Morth P. Ootvft -U& III IOM Dotic ORONO,MN 44-0% sANrrARy sEwF-R mANFoLr= PLAN F, GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 42 DIAMETER AT PEPE AND SLOPE GROUT 2"TOWARD INVERT. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL 13E KAM SO THAT OFFSE. VERTDCAL PORTION OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. NEENAH R16428 FRAME AND COM OR EQUAL WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK wuTL INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 6 CONCREFE ADJUSTMENT SUNGS WITH 2 RINGS OF RAM-NEK BETWEEN EACH. UM HOPE SLOPE RINGS TO ACHIEVE SLOPE- 2 RINGS OF RAM-NEK AT CONNECTION! 71) CONCRETE AND USE SEALANT AS SPECIFIED BY MANUAL FOR PLASTIC TO PLASTM MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R19BIl OR EQUAL, IS' ON CENTER. AUJMINUM STEPS APPRCVED. ALL JOISTS N MANHOLE TO HAVE 'W RING RUBBER GASKETS. PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLISH WITH INME FACE OF WALL NOTIL' KDR-N-SEAL MANHOILE OR EQUAL. CORSIDERED ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE. DROP UD TYLER ND. am MUELLER NO. H -103U DIPPY-STE-CILDIX NO. B -SIM GPADE TOP TYm NOL 68M 21p MUELLER NO. M-10351 2r BIPPY-STE-CRM NO. VB502 27' EXTENSM TyUst No. SB IV ND. S, 'r NO. so ze NO. SB 24' NO -59 zv OMPY-STE40MIX V9520 NO. 57 1. Viso. No. 35 IV VBM NO. 59 2(r VB523 NO, 60 2fir MUELLER BOTTOM MUELLER NM W10361. 65' mp"lqr&o= MVM16 w f BASE i NCITES'. ALL DIP WATEWNIN $HALL BE GROUT eorrom OF mANmmz 70 34z OlAMIErER WRAPpm wnw a mL PoLy AT PIPE AND SLOPE GROUT r 70MM INVERT. GRDUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO W 75'MMIMUMCDVERREQlfiRRD ANGLEOEQUALTOCALARGER OVER TOP OF WATER MAUL ir MEGALUGSOR2 - 3WTIE RODS 2"WARD ERVERT REQUIRED FROM VALYE TO TEB. WITHOWDUERFE]RINCIWITH rl- ADIUFTTOP TO 1/2'BELOW 0 - 45' MDWUK MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACM GRADE. 6=709ESETTO SO THAT OFFSET VERTICALPOPTEDN PROVDIDE 12'OFADJUSTMENT. CONNECT V COME.5 FACING DOWNSTREAM. GRADE �� +7, TPAM W= .W. , rr CONNECT END OF To DOTrOm NVENAR RLS422 FRAME ANDCDVEIt OR TYLER 00. SIND NUTOF EgJAL WITH z wKEP-rD Pwcx HOU& MUELLER NO. FI -10357 PLAN PLAN IUPPY-STIE-CROIX 54MI RING TERMINAL INFI-SHIELO EXTER)AL SEALING SUEEJE GATE VALVE WK SCREW TYPE, MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMLAM OF 6 CONCRETE 3 PIECE, 5 11V SHAFT, SIZE G I ADJUSNENT RINGS WITH 2 RINGS OF BOX, 7'-W IEXIENDEP� ff RA"% BETWEEN E001. USE ME ROUND BASE SLM RU40 TO ACHIEVE SLOR, 2 RINGS OF PAM44K h7CONNECTION TO COKWmAN 3 USE SEALANT AS SPECIFIED BY MANUAL IOR PLASTIC TO 12 AM V PLAFTIr- MAKLINE WIRF� STRIP, KNOT MANHOLE SIM NEENAH R19W 12 AVIS CU�T. OR EQUiA4 W OR ONTER. BRANCH AL;JMIWJM STEPS APPRDVEDL WOW, STRIP A ALL jOMM IN MANHOLE TO HAVE DIRECT BURY LUG IV RING RLIUM QRS&M PIPE SHALL BE OUT CUT FLUSH Vff4 INSIDE FACE OF WN J NOTE! KDR4MWA K04HOLE OREMAI. �9— Z5'4$Z3EIUE0 ACCIPTABJE ALTERNATE --MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS OF PRE CASTBASE 0 IS tr FOR IN CUP OR LESS, ANDINCREASE V J&N 2m IN THtO(NESS FOR EVERY 4'OF DEPTH TRACER WIRE CONNECTIONS SECTION GREATER THAN 14' 44-0% sANrrARy sEwF-R mANFoLr= PLAN F, GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 42 DIAMETER AT PEPE AND SLOPE GROUT 2"TOWARD INVERT. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL 13E KAM SO THAT OFFSE. VERTDCAL PORTION OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. NEENAH R16428 FRAME AND COM OR EQUAL WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK wuTL INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE MINIMUM OF 2 MAXIMUM OF 6 CONCREFE ADJUSTMENT SUNGS WITH 2 RINGS OF RAM-NEK BETWEEN EACH. UM HOPE SLOPE RINGS TO ACHIEVE SLOPE- 2 RINGS OF RAM-NEK AT CONNECTION! 71) CONCRETE AND USE SEALANT AS SPECIFIED BY MANUAL FOR PLASTIC TO PLASTM MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R19BIl OR EQUAL, IS' ON CENTER. AUJMINUM STEPS APPRCVED. ALL JOISTS N MANHOLE TO HAVE 'W RING RUBBER GASKETS. PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLISH WITH INME FACE OF WALL NOTIL' KDR-N-SEAL MANHOILE OR EQUAL. CORSIDERED ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE. DROP UD TYLER ND. am MUELLER NO. H -103U DIPPY-STE-CILDIX NO. B -SIM GPADE TOP TYm NOL 68M 21p MUELLER NO. M-10351 2r BIPPY-STE-CRM NO. VB502 27' EXTENSM TyUst No. SB IV ND. S, 'r NO. so ze NO. SB 24' NO -59 zv OMPY-STE40MIX V9520 NO. 57 1. Viso. No. 35 IV VBM NO. 59 2(r VB523 NO, 60 2fir MUELLER BOTTOM MUELLER NM W10361. 65' mp"lqr&o= MVM16 w f BASE i NCITES'. ALL DIP WATEWNIN $HALL BE WRAPpm wnw a mL PoLy V#MMKG ALL MIECHANUIAL JOINTS GRDUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO W 75'MMIMUMCDVERREQlfiRRD ANGLEOEQUALTOCALARGER OVER TOP OF WATER MAUL ir MEGALUGSOR2 - 3WTIE RODS 2"WARD ERVERT REQUIRED FROM VALYE TO TEB. WITHOWDUERFE]RINCIWITH rl- ADIUFTTOP TO 1/2'BELOW 0 - 45' MDWUK GRADE. 6=709ESETTO MANHOLE STEPS SNA" 09 KA= 50 THAT OFFSET YERTICAL PORTM PROVDIDE 12'OFADJUSTMENT. CONNECT OF CONE 15 FACING DOWNSTREAM. GRADE �� +7, TPAM W= .W. , rr CONNECT END OF To DOTrOm NEENAH R-164211 FRAME AND WAR OR TYLER 00. SIND NUTOF EQUX WITH 2 OCINCZALED PICK HOLES. MUELLER NO. FI -10357 HYDRANT WITH PLAN IUPPY-STIE-CROIX 54MI RING TERMINAL INFI-SHIELD EMERNAL SEALING REM GATE VALVE WK SCREW TYPE, MINIMUM OF Z KWHUP 0" WOOKE, 3 PIECE, 5 11V SHAFT, SIZE G I ACOUSTMENT RINGS WITH 2 FOGS OF BOX, 7'-W IEXIENDEP� ff RAM -WEN BETWEEN EAV. ROUND BASE NUT EXTENSION DWALLED ONLY WHEN REQJRED nl /,INL.EIS STEEL BOLT5 TO ALVE ST GAT�VE MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS OF PRE CAST &ASIE 15 6- FOR I -q- DEEP OR LE3% AND INCREASE 1 - SECTION IN TKICWESS FOR EVERY 4CF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14, GATE VALVE AND BOX SANrTARY SEWER 3UNCTION MANHOLE INSTALLATION 11, IFWAT IF 13S-MT-&D� r39-STc-l.DwG CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 9 CIN EnginwfirV @ Lmd Ph—ling IND pImw erma Cwrbw. P.Q Om 240 No 'M=ll Pht Fm 70-4711-4242 E -*a s-mT-l.DviO mm FOR VDINN. MANHOLE AN 8' MECAST SLAB 15 REQUIRED. ROICIAR. SMALL BE PURE PORTLAND SPECMIX OR APPROVED 04LAL I 139-570-2.M or rqwt hm Under my *0 I = a :94i wMIw to 4'--.' Of GROW BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 10 DIAMETER AT PIPE AND SLOPE GRDUT 2"TOWARDINVERT. MANHOLE - SHALL BE PLACM SO THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. NEENAH RKA2B FRAME AND COVER Olt EQUAL WrIH 2 CONCEALED PICK HIM MINIMLN OF 2 MAXIMUM! OF a ODNORETE AD3USTMENT RINGS WITH 2 Bb= (IF RAM-NEK WMEN BOTH B07M RUE ANDSTRUCTUIREANCTOPROMAND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAP BETIAMM MIDDLE RINGS. INFI-SHIEUD EXTERNAL SEALING Minn �Klll, r UYERIAM) V PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MMHOLE SLAB WITH #4 BARS ATS' Oir EACH WAY AND 2-04 BARS ATALL SIDES OF OPENING. ]INSTALL INFI-SHIEUDGAINK WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL� MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH RIND OR EQUAL, IS' ON CENnER. ALUMINUM SrEPSAPPROVED, ALLJOIffTS IN MN*0LE-r0 HAVE '0" RING RUBBER. GASKETS. PIPE SMALL BE CLIT OUr PLUSH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL MIN114UM SLAB THICKNES% 6- FOR L4' DEPTH. INCREASETH=ASSr FOR EACH 4- OF DEPTH GREATER IMAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH 6W LM10 MESH. 'HYDRAFINDER' HYDRANT LOCATOR (PROVIDE 2 PER MY DELIVER EXTRA ONI PUBLIC WDRI&) BREAK OFF 3. SrAINLESSSTEEL HYDRANT SHALL BE WATERDU9 PACER W5.100 OR YAWWITH STAINLESS BOLTS AND 16" TRAFFIC BREAK OFF SECTION WDRANTSHULPEKIR&V BUKY. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7-6' OF COVER. FOR VALVE BOX INSIALLTMN SEE DETAIL PILATE P* WA`r 1. HYDRANTS AND GATEVALVES SWLL BE RESTRAINED wnH mwjamq& RESILIEVIT WEDGE VALVE CONFORNINGTOAWWA C -30M STANDARDS. ALL D.U. VMTERMAIN SMALL BE WRAPPED WITH a MD. PL&SM INCLUDING ALL MECHAIGOAL)CINTS APO POLY TAPED ATALL 30M N WI-EAD LOOP '-Ir cofor- ELM TRACER I CU. M OF I 1jr ROCY OMER WIRETO 1001TH 2 LAYERS OF POLYETHYLENE. HYDRANT VALVE AND HYDRANT JAN 2011 11 INSTALLATION PLAN r RADOM VARIES 22'W 'ECTION �OWIAIL SHALL BE PURE SPECMD(OR APPROVED EQUAL 24wX3W SLAB OPENING FOR NEENAH R30M OR EQUAL (VAM GRATE SHOWN) GRATE� SHALL HAVE 'DUMP ND WAST -r. DRAINS TO FRESH WATER ON CASTING. DIMENSION FROM BAD(OF CURB TO CENTER OF PIPE. V Olk MH - 9'IN FROM BACK OF CURB 9 DILA. MH - 3"IN FROM BA(XOFCURB G'DLAL MH - Y'BE3HaND BACK OF CURB 71 DIA. MH - 91 BEHIND Mac OF ajRg WDYL MH - 15. BEF13ND BACK OF CURB MVMUM OF 2 AND MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADIUSTMENT 1UNGS WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK BETWEEN BOTH BOTTOM RING AND STRLCWM TOP RING AND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN MIDDLE RINGS. INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE AROUND ALL AMUSTING RINGS (MIN. Z' OVERLAP.) I RING WXAM-NEK-0.23'; Ka. HOlUZ!DNTAL OFFSEr=0.V(3-). 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB, TOP OF BARREL SECTION UNDER TOP SLAB TO HAVE FLAT 110P EDGE - WITH 2 BEADS Of RAMIN& OR EQUAL. WRAP EXMMJOKrVMrNFq-SHMM GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL ALL JOINTS IN 14ANHOLE TO HAVE 'C* RING RUBBER GASKETS. PRECAST CONCRETE SWnCN KANHOLESTEPS, NEENAH R19913 OR EQUAL, IS- O.C., ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. 4" PVC TEE FOR DRAINTILE CONINECUOIN. NO BLOCK STPUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6' Post snWCTURES 14'3N DEPTH. INCREASIE THICKNESS 1. FOR EACH I OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH JUNCTION MANHOLE WITH SLAB TOP CATWBASIN MANHOLE STIDRM SEWM I 'TYPE H L r" cr EISINGER MEADOWS vwt "Blo.z. LAKE WEST, LLC. DOW ORONO.MN SHAPE OF RACK OF BUTTRESS MAY VERY AS LONG AS PWRED AGAIKSTFM UMC157MED ENRI'll. DIMENSION clx2p SHOULD BE LARGE END" M MAMIE GRDUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO W ANGLEOEQUALTOCALARGER MWrER AT "It AND SLOPE GROUT ir DMENSION JUAXA3 SHOW BE AS LARM AS POSSIBLE 2"WARD ERVERT 12 AWG WATER -PROOF RING TERMINAL WITHOWDUERFE]RINCIWITH rl- C) 0 - 45' MDWUK =E� MANHOLE STEPS SNA" 09 KA= 50 THAT OFFSET YERTICAL PORTM FINISH I OF CONE 15 FACING DOWNSTREAM. GRADE �� +7, .W. , rr CONNECT END OF NEENAH R-164211 FRAME AND WAR OR BM TRACER EQUX WITH 2 OCINCZALED PICK HOLES. 'WIRES PLAN INFI-SHIELD EMERNAL SEALING REM FINISH GRADE MINIMUM OF Z KWHUP 0" WOOKE, HYDRANT CONNECTION ACOUSTMENT RINGS WITH 2 FOGS OF RAM -WEN BETWEEN EAV. 3r MANHOLE EMS, MEW 1119813 4� OR EQUAL, 16- ON CENIM ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. ALL 3OMTS IN MARMOLE TO HAVE '0" RIM RUBBER GASKETS. 12 AM S. MAKLINE WIRF� STRIP, KNOT PIPE SMALL HE CUT OUT FLUSH 12 AVIS CU�T. BRANCH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL WOW, STRIP A DIRECT BURY LUG MANHOLE. EQUAL ACCEPTAELE ALTERNATE. MMIMUM SLAB THICIMES% S' FOR IV DEPTH. MCREASE7KICKNESS I'FOR EACH,r OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14�, AND REINFORCE WITH U'XS' 10VIO MESH. 0 MARCH 2DI 11 J&N 2m U44, TRACER WIRE CONNECTIONS �vi STORM SEWER JUNCTION MANHOLE fl FwAFB KATEM o -i I 13S-MT-&D� r39-STc-l.DwG CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 9 CIN EnginwfirV @ Lmd Ph—ling IND pImw erma Cwrbw. P.Q Om 240 No 'M=ll Pht Fm 70-4711-4242 E -*a s-mT-l.DviO mm FOR VDINN. MANHOLE AN 8' MECAST SLAB 15 REQUIRED. ROICIAR. SMALL BE PURE PORTLAND SPECMIX OR APPROVED 04LAL I 139-570-2.M or rqwt hm Under my *0 I = a :94i wMIw to 4'--.' Of GROW BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 10 DIAMETER AT PIPE AND SLOPE GRDUT 2"TOWARDINVERT. MANHOLE - SHALL BE PLACM SO THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. NEENAH RKA2B FRAME AND COVER Olt EQUAL WrIH 2 CONCEALED PICK HIM MINIMLN OF 2 MAXIMUM! OF a ODNORETE AD3USTMENT RINGS WITH 2 Bb= (IF RAM-NEK WMEN BOTH B07M RUE ANDSTRUCTUIREANCTOPROMAND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAP BETIAMM MIDDLE RINGS. INFI-SHIEUD EXTERNAL SEALING Minn �Klll, r UYERIAM) V PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MMHOLE SLAB WITH #4 BARS ATS' Oir EACH WAY AND 2-04 BARS ATALL SIDES OF OPENING. ]INSTALL INFI-SHIEUDGAINK WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL� MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH RIND OR EQUAL, IS' ON CENnER. ALUMINUM SrEPSAPPROVED, ALLJOIffTS IN MN*0LE-r0 HAVE '0" RING RUBBER. GASKETS. PIPE SMALL BE CLIT OUr PLUSH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL MIN114UM SLAB THICKNES% 6- FOR L4' DEPTH. INCREASETH=ASSr FOR EACH 4- OF DEPTH GREATER IMAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH 6W LM10 MESH. 'HYDRAFINDER' HYDRANT LOCATOR (PROVIDE 2 PER MY DELIVER EXTRA ONI PUBLIC WDRI&) BREAK OFF 3. SrAINLESSSTEEL HYDRANT SHALL BE WATERDU9 PACER W5.100 OR YAWWITH STAINLESS BOLTS AND 16" TRAFFIC BREAK OFF SECTION WDRANTSHULPEKIR&V BUKY. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7-6' OF COVER. FOR VALVE BOX INSIALLTMN SEE DETAIL PILATE P* WA`r 1. HYDRANTS AND GATEVALVES SWLL BE RESTRAINED wnH mwjamq& RESILIEVIT WEDGE VALVE CONFORNINGTOAWWA C -30M STANDARDS. ALL D.U. VMTERMAIN SMALL BE WRAPPED WITH a MD. PL&SM INCLUDING ALL MECHAIGOAL)CINTS APO POLY TAPED ATALL 30M N WI-EAD LOOP '-Ir cofor- ELM TRACER I CU. M OF I 1jr ROCY OMER WIRETO 1001TH 2 LAYERS OF POLYETHYLENE. HYDRANT VALVE AND HYDRANT JAN 2011 11 INSTALLATION PLAN r RADOM VARIES 22'W 'ECTION �OWIAIL SHALL BE PURE SPECMD(OR APPROVED EQUAL 24wX3W SLAB OPENING FOR NEENAH R30M OR EQUAL (VAM GRATE SHOWN) GRATE� SHALL HAVE 'DUMP ND WAST -r. DRAINS TO FRESH WATER ON CASTING. DIMENSION FROM BAD(OF CURB TO CENTER OF PIPE. V Olk MH - 9'IN FROM BACK OF CURB 9 DILA. MH - 3"IN FROM BA(XOFCURB G'DLAL MH - Y'BE3HaND BACK OF CURB 71 DIA. MH - 91 BEHIND Mac OF ajRg WDYL MH - 15. BEF13ND BACK OF CURB MVMUM OF 2 AND MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADIUSTMENT 1UNGS WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK BETWEEN BOTH BOTTOM RING AND STRLCWM TOP RING AND CASTING. FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN MIDDLE RINGS. INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SLEEVE AROUND ALL AMUSTING RINGS (MIN. Z' OVERLAP.) I RING WXAM-NEK-0.23'; Ka. HOlUZ!DNTAL OFFSEr=0.V(3-). 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB, TOP OF BARREL SECTION UNDER TOP SLAB TO HAVE FLAT 110P EDGE - WITH 2 BEADS Of RAMIN& OR EQUAL. WRAP EXMMJOKrVMrNFq-SHMM GATOR WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL ALL JOINTS IN 14ANHOLE TO HAVE 'C* RING RUBBER GASKETS. PRECAST CONCRETE SWnCN KANHOLESTEPS, NEENAH R19913 OR EQUAL, IS- O.C., ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED. 4" PVC TEE FOR DRAINTILE CONINECUOIN. NO BLOCK STPUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6' Post snWCTURES 14'3N DEPTH. INCREASIE THICKNESS 1. FOR EACH I OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH JUNCTION MANHOLE WITH SLAB TOP CATWBASIN MANHOLE STIDRM SEWM I 'TYPE H L r" cr EISINGER MEADOWS vwt "Blo.z. LAKE WEST, LLC. DOW ORONO.MN SHAPE OF RACK OF BUTTRESS MAY VERY AS LONG AS PWRED AGAIKSTFM UMC157MED ENRI'll. DIMENSION clx2p SHOULD BE LARGE END" M MAMIE RIPE SIZE v ANGLEOEQUALTOCALARGER THAN 45�. ir DMENSION JUAXA3 SHOW BE AS LARM AS POSSIBLE w mr WITHOWDUERFE]RINCIWITH rl- M3 BOLTS. 0 - 45' MDWUK PLACE POLyrnln=g BETWEEN CONCRETE A PIPE 4A PLAN 90' 13ENDS MIN. CONmaresHALLE IN CONTACT WITH HIS QUADRANT OF PIPE ar BEOMNS MATERIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH CONCRE'E SECTION A -A I�Np. 0 0 IS -smtxm A 40 , A.ir Li=l I PLAN 45' BENDS 6 SEE NOTE A PLAN 22 1120 BENDS fa=. CONCP=THRUST BLOCKING IFW;�6- ",I LL1111110 F GROUT 8=74 OFCATCHBASIN SLOPE TO PIPE 4r MWEMI NEENAH R4342 CASTING OR EQUAL. NEENAH R4342 CASTING OR EQUAL MR -SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING 9-11EVE "N. 2- OVERLAP) MINIMUM OF 2 KAXIMM 0" CaNRETEAD3US`IMEN7RP#3S ALLOWEID WITH 2 RINGS OF RAM -Nm BETWEEN EACIi. FULL Bm OF MORTAR BurAmw MIDDLE RINGS. RMNIFOAMPREGASTODNORETE DONE SINITICR J� W f TYPE I CATCHBAMN mv-�4�m MINE DETAILS SHEET NO. 11 OF 12 SHEETS �.P45m' IAN 2D21 m� No, STO-4 15-039 16 I NOW. VANE GRATE 6" 1 DISTANCE TO 4i VARIABLE SHOWN BARS --- FACE.'. 7-T DIRECTLON OF FUOW IF 314*0 ; Ur CATCHpmN CASrw NEENAH R3067 OR EQUAL 3/4V WITH VANE GRATE r RADIUS CURB BOOL RAN GRATE SHALL HAVE VULL RED OF MORTAR BETWEEN IDUMPNOVIAM PUDDLE RINGS, MAR HOPMONTAL DRAM TO FRESH WATER OFFSET - O.W. ON CASTING. 3.W GRATE TO BE 7 BEL13W GVrrER MMIN. Or 2MAX. OF 6 MADE. iO'TRANSMON EACH CONCRETE ADXt9rMENT SIDEOFCATCHBAMK. RiNGs WITH a RD= OF VARLABLE RAM-NeK BETWEEN DOM BOTMMRIKGAND ST1WCTURE,TOPRM AND CASTING, FULL RD OF MORTAR BETWEEN MmCLE RPM 24- X 36' jNPj4K=SEALm Ppirw Bur SLEEVE OR A 3"GROLT DOGHOUSES [2 V... rb ON BOTH THE AND THE INSIDF- MORTAL. SHALL BE PURE PORTLAND SPEUMD1 OR APPROVED EQUAL 4 THICK C ENC 139-MR-P-CIWO BE CITY PLATE NO. STD -7 FOR RIPRAP R-AMMMUNT, L-TMLA5T3FfftXWM USE 2 TEE BOLT FASTENERS PERJOINT. INSTALLAT w FROM TOP Oft BOTTOM OF PIPE PROVIDE 3 ANCHOR CUPS M FASTEN TRASH GUAR0 TO RAND END SECTION. H0TD1---L--.—, TRASH GUAM =Me 6" 1 DISTANCE TO 4i VARIABLE PIPE BARS I N, BUTS IF 314*0 ; Ur SM J!r 3/4V 3" In. 1. 3/4V i' if 21".24, 110 41 3.W 27"-35. '"o DRIVEWAYS MUST BE EMOLOSED IN W4, 'u. 1"o r 314. mr-W, 1114-0 W r W -7T I WO F r 7W -W 1114-0 Ir r CLASS 2 PIP IFTO 2'r 2rTD3r 3ir TO 49- Iz CUBIC Y� W ANDUP 16 CUBIC YA90S (ONE CUBIC VARD IS APPFK)nMATELY 2,000 Las.) PLAN RUnw FAB= �RL. BLANIKET SEQIOK A -A LINER "m �HTER BLANKETREQUIRED UNDER RZPAAP Oft 2 LAVERS OF 5= SIRM FAB= OR EQW RIFRAP FILTER BLANKET SECTPON sa LINER LARW-90M i I TYPED FLAREO END SECTION )AN 2WO RIPPAP AT OUTLETS CATCHBASIN AND TRASH GUAM L SERVICE RISER C�E 11 —SER -2. DE?frIALi VARMBLE 13, 13618 COMMERCIAL \- CONTROL 3WIT Z EKPANSION MINT DRIVEWAY CURB CUT (BOTH SIDES) _—I LIS -R BITUMINOUS SURFACE R�-.1vN'OUSV SHCH5 FORM I I CM lm_STR-1.� CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. CURB AND GUTTER 0 ON Erigimerbg 0 LAnd P%nnhU law Pk"w Credt Opaw. P.O. Ou 240 9 Is PWA w as= Phw mm 7113-4711-45172 Fax E-lAdl: im. 1 —0, L"Tm )AN 2=: 5UN60.AVTAUE CONCRETE CURB & GJrrER NO SCALE 2 - 41 REBARS 17 Mw. TammaTm 19 MIN TRANSITION TOP GF i 7 11Z' DESIM 3U77rnL1N'.—/ rj FRAME& CASTING RMAN i SOCTION A -A iWSCALE *04, 0 — 0 139-STR-JOK or rsW hom bm 5 1 by m - Umw my dhd r*wvmon mw owt I an a dOy lkwm Wid P= "En2in WWW the bn of Um m CAT01 SAM fRAM9 ADJUSTING RBM AS PER SPECIFICATIONS NEOPRENE RUBBER TOP SBCTTON EPD14 RUBBER BOTTOM SECTION (KIN.60MILTHRMVESS) IXTERNAL SEAL SLEEVE TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS CATCH @kq3q smucruRE -SANITARY OR STMM SMER MANHOLE FRAME -ADJLffnNG RINGS ASPER SPECIFICATIONS -NEOPRENE RUBBER TOP SEMON -EPON RUBBER BOUGH SECTION (MmooMILTHumem EXTERNAL SEAL. SLEEVE TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RBOOMMERDATH)NS OR CONE SECTION *11 -re. I I CATCHBASIN AND MANHOLE EX-MMAL SEAL L CL PL 2H zS' Lc to Fwe Omcrete Czb 3% MIN. 114'/ Fut WM 1 1112- - 23* HITUMIN��: ALLORGARICOROMER 2* - LUI BrrUMOUS ME COURSE UNSWABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FftCr BENEATH W - CLASS 5 AGGREGATE RPM- 100% GUSHED THE ROADWAY. SLIOGRADE STABILIZATION FAERM (SURAC W OR SQUALJ LEICOMPA.ED.U.... OVER Brrummus S -km := sim-Aag.� PL CL PL i it 1 8610 CONORETECURR CRO", 11w I POOT 6" 1 DISTANCE TO 4i VARIABLE NOTE- D4n LL[ �31-=-CDWO IJ2"p c".) ZFINISH. . COME SLOPE TO BE IJ2- ABOVE EDGE " rUTTEA TO BE FORMED INTO A 6618 TYPE AT CATCHIASIN. Kr PER FT OF GUTTER BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH 6 - - CIA$5 3 AGGRMATE BASF, IOD% GUSHED THE ROADVOW. CATOBBASIV FRAMEA. NEENAH R-3067 Olt EQUAL WITH TYPE OL OR VANE GRA -E CDKFACTEDSUBGRADE 3-10 NCRETE MNDOT 9118 if NOTE; E"R-8-GrOPS SHALL FW Be LO0TED ��==RSE TO BE GIJTTEFL NOTE MODONALD 4717 ENGINEER. CUPBSTOPS IN CATCHBASIN -0 BE DISPRESSED r BELOW OEFIGN GUTTER UNE GKADL DRIVEWAYS MUST BE EMOLOSED IN FORD EM 2-75-55 ESS BROTHERS 'EWER CUEANDUT. A.Y� MODONALO 5615 WITH ROD NO. 5569 W7TH COVER KAAKED'WXW. M CONCRETE SURMOUNTABLE D-429 SERVICE RISER C�E 11 —SER -2. DE?frIALi VARMBLE 13, 13618 COMMERCIAL \- CONTROL 3WIT Z EKPANSION MINT DRIVEWAY CURB CUT (BOTH SIDES) _—I LIS -R BITUMINOUS SURFACE R�-.1vN'OUSV SHCH5 FORM I I CM lm_STR-1.� CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. CURB AND GUTTER 0 ON Erigimerbg 0 LAnd P%nnhU law Pk"w Credt Opaw. P.O. Ou 240 9 Is PWA w as= Phw mm 7113-4711-45172 Fax E-lAdl: im. 1 —0, L"Tm )AN 2=: 5UN60.AVTAUE CONCRETE CURB & GJrrER NO SCALE 2 - 41 REBARS 17 Mw. TammaTm 19 MIN TRANSITION TOP GF i 7 11Z' DESIM 3U77rnL1N'.—/ rj FRAME& CASTING RMAN i SOCTION A -A iWSCALE *04, 0 — 0 139-STR-JOK or rsW hom bm 5 1 by m - Umw my dhd r*wvmon mw owt I an a dOy lkwm Wid P= "En2in WWW the bn of Um m CAT01 SAM fRAM9 ADJUSTING RBM AS PER SPECIFICATIONS NEOPRENE RUBBER TOP SBCTTON EPD14 RUBBER BOTTOM SECTION (KIN.60MILTHRMVESS) IXTERNAL SEAL SLEEVE TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS CATCH @kq3q smucruRE -SANITARY OR STMM SMER MANHOLE FRAME -ADJLffnNG RINGS ASPER SPECIFICATIONS -NEOPRENE RUBBER TOP SEMON -EPON RUBBER BOUGH SECTION (MmooMILTHumem EXTERNAL SEAL. SLEEVE TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RBOOMMERDATH)NS OR CONE SECTION *11 -re. I I CATCHBASIN AND MANHOLE EX-MMAL SEAL L CL PL 2H zS' Lc to Fwe Omcrete Czb 3% MIN. 114'/ Fut WM 1 1112- - 23* HITUMIN��: ALLORGARICOROMER 2* - LUI BrrUMOUS ME COURSE UNSWABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FftCr BENEATH W - CLASS 5 AGGREGATE RPM- 100% GUSHED THE ROADWAY. SLIOGRADE STABILIZATION FAERM (SURAC W OR SQUALJ LEICOMPA.ED.U.... OVER Brrummus S -km := sim-Aag.� PL CL PL i it 1 8610 CONORETECURR CRO", 11w I POOT I I EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN D&U PL EASEMENT VARIABLE VARIABLE I PENCEPOST CURB STOP WATER Sffa= r BLOCK SUPPORT —, N PDXWORATIDNSTDP Ppe'WCOPPER I 'wo � \ I i-4�- NOTE LL[ ALLORGANIC OR OTHER SURMOUNTABLE CURB 8L GUTTER. CONSTRUCTION AT CATCHBASIN WWffABLE MATERIAL SIALL ELL 2- - 2301 STIJMINDUS BASE 03URSE BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH 6 - - CIA$5 3 AGGRMATE BASF, IOD% GUSHED THE ROADVOW. 9LIBORAPS STABILIMT104 FABRIC N PAC SNP OR EQUAL) CDKFACTEDSUBGRADE 3-10 BITUMINOUS STREET =EFE CURB AND GUTTER I I EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN D&U PL EASEMENT VARIABLE VARIABLE I PENCEPOST CURB STOP WATER Sffa= r BLOCK SUPPORT —, N PDXWORATIDNSTDP Ppe'WCOPPER I 'wo � \ �112r.U.VD-IL7ROCK *04p. 2' 17 MARKER I uw� SURMOUNTABLE CURB 8L GUTTER. CONSTRUCTION AT CATCHBASIN JAN 2DW 0 0 TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR PUBLIC RESIDENTIAL STREETS fAUELLEFt W25M FORD F-600 KY. URBAN SECTION CURB STOP WU—aMf1-1S1S4 NOTE; E"R-8-GrOPS SHALL FW Be LO0TED AM OZZ-333M OR BZ2-444M &Y. IN DRIVEWAYS UNI APPROVED BY MODONALD 4717 I I EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN D&U PL EASEMENT VARIABLE VARIABLE I PENCEPOST CURB STOP WATER Sffa= r BLOCK SUPPORT —, N PDXWORATIDNSTDP Ppe'WCOPPER I 'wo � \ �112r.U.VD-IL7ROCK 2' 17 MARKER SANWARY SEWER - WATER MAIN CORPORATION STOP fAUELLEFt W25M FORD F-600 KY. MCOONALD47U CURB STOP WU—aMf1-1S1S4 NOTE; E"R-8-GrOPS SHALL FW Be LO0TED AM OZZ-333M OR BZ2-444M &Y. IN DRIVEWAYS UNI APPROVED BY MODONALD 4717 ENGINEER. CUPBSTOPS IN am MUM4ZRh-l03W0RH-1M DRIVEWAYS MUST BE EMOLOSED IN FORD EM 2-75-55 ESS BROTHERS 'EWER CUEANDUT. A.Y� MODONALO 5615 WITH ROD NO. 5569 W7TH COVER KAAKED'WXW. 0 f6h.. 0 SEWER AND WATER SERVICE COqNECTIONS I DETAILS EET NO. 12 OF 12 SHE 15-039 Fv -71 A Ell I r mw w Ire, ANN 1�� Aff A-. 1 7 WN, 4JI So, -qw 11 ---------- ----- 4 Cl fool, 7; 0 'A L*A h, McDONALD CONSTRUCTION mcdonaldconstruption-com 952-693-8476 stemantdesionlig.com 952-693-8475 Copyright of these documents is owned by McDonald Construction Inc. and reserves ALL rights. These plans/ designs may not be re- used, copied or assigned to another party nor shall they be modified or used in part in other designs without the prior written consent of McDonald Construction Inc. 0EVELONENT M. W. EISINGER MEADOWS ORONO,MN These plans are schematic for bidding purposes only, Interior dimensions and details may vary on CAD drawings ;N 7 UOILO - & W MIL -L M: N A ,d dF ;A VEADM fmanun u iL MOM 46 Ik F-I"ll p WOM, n -MORN" mumammmmm *-w Ro PWnOrdWl*bb M*dK*d W MW KPINt EMMOR MEADOWS ORONOw mm ohm are PWPM4 ow *MdxmuWdobk Joe +1 1, .0 , t PLAN A i a 'A AA k, I 75 li .00 imww�� I xkmKmw9mft� amba"m 6=11tom . I W. by Wounwounlumm I= mW owww4a ALL Vft TbmpkW deftnowm1bon. wW, oopled or 11 fe or~ vie P=nonmt omnskelon lqm EINNIMER MEADOWS ORONO, MN F" uhmno*fwbkMng PWPDNMO* Maku a I laimanddshft dMdW . —A -A. Lr I PLAN 13 mv� ds::= dahlL Tom pWW dmtunwrmbow UNKmowar m""Imonou PNV=omvwbo wommormdhPot esm&wpwwm lopw MON CIA&DUFMid Cbmwhoomim EIMNOER' MEADOWS Lfli ITOM momphMan d, kwtmmg PWPDMG*k,kNim I OW debb mwvwonow dmwfts r-) -rlz*� PLAN -C 6655 EBCX--7rCX"�-J 8L Noel E=r�-J �<,r Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow -Lane, Suits 200 - Chaska, IVIN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 - Fax (952) 448-8805 (5 www.bolton-menk.com April 11, 2016 City of Orono Attn: �&ke Gaffron 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 16-3822 Eisinger Meadows Engineering Review #1 Dear Mike: I rN-J C�I. As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL: Resolution Exhibit C 1.1 Stormwater management for the proposed site meets City requirements. Proposed peak runoff rates will be restricted to less than existing peak runoff rates. However, if the proposed design is significantly revised during the Final Plat approval process, a Final Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted with the Final Construction Plans. Also, additional detail will be required with the Final Plans to ensure system is constructed as designed. 1.2 Storm sewer calculations should be submitted for review to verify adequate sizing. 1.3 The Conservation Design Master Plan (CDMP) should be revised to include more complete recommendations and direction to address the following topics: a. Invasive Svecies — The CDMP should be revised to include a complete Vegetation Management Plan. The plan should include a list of all invasive plant species encountered (i.e. buckthorn, garlic mustard, reed canary grass, creeping charlie, canada thistle, etc.) and recommended procedures and schedule for eradication of listed species. b. Protection of Significant Tree Stands — The CDMP should be revised to include discussions on the location, quality, and value of existing significant tree stands, recommendations for areas to be preserved, and justification and mitigation of impacts of any such stands to be impacted by development activities. The Vegetation Management Plan should depict proposed Tree Preservation areas and trees designated for removal to allow for review of potential conservation easements. c. Protection of Wetlands — The Vegetation Management Plan should include procedures, schedule, and seed mixes for protecting and establishing buffers around wetlands. 1.4 Due to the size of proposed disturbance, a Topsoil Management Plan should be included with the Final Plans to ensure adequate topsoil placement. The plan should provide direction for topsoil stripping, stockpile location(s), soil de -compaction prior to re -spread, certification of topsoil for re - spread meeting specifications, and placement of topsoil. This information could be included on the Final Grading Plan. 1.5 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting for their Erosion Control, Wetland Protection, and Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rules. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Preliminary Plat Application 16-3822 Eisinger Meadows Page 2 Plat approval. Since proposed impervious surface will account for less than 20% of the project area, storrnwater management should not be required by MCWD. 1.6 The applicant will be required to obtain Hennepin County approval and permitting for accesses and work in right-of-way on Wayzata Boulevard (CSAH 112). Development parameters listed in the City's Comprehensive Plan call for a single connection, but two connections are proposed. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 1.7 The applicant will be required to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and a Water Main Extension permit from the Minnesota Department of Health. Applications should be coordinated with the City, and a copy of any approvals or pem-jits. required should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 1.8 The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit (NPDES) to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than 1 acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 1.9 The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, and designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities. 1.10 Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. If the proposed permanent pond is to be used as a temporary sediment basin during construction, as -built survey shots on the pond must be obtained after construction sediment is removed and side slopes re -dressed. Also, due to the size of the proposed disturbed area, a survey should be provided for the site after rough grading is complete to ensure correct hold-downs prior to topsoil placement and pavement construction, and a survey should be provided for the topsoil stockpile to ensure adequate quantity for re -spread. 2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT: 2.1 A Flowage and Conservation easement will be required over the wetlands. 2.2 Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided to adequately cover all ditching, storm sewer, and ponds to the high water level. 2.3 Drainage and Utility Easements should be revised to accommodate changes to storm sewer necessary to provide subsurface draintile service connections. 2.4 Outlot B will require a road and utilities easement over its entire area. The easement should be generated using the standard city form and recorded as part of the Final Plat process. 3.0 SITE PLAN: 3.1 Stop signs and stop bars should be provided at intersections with Wayzata Boulevard (CSAH 112). 3.2 The proposed layout should be reviewed by the Fire Chief to ensure adequate space for turning around of fire department vehicles. A temporary cul-de-sac may be necessary. 4.0 GRADING PLAN: 4.1 The normal water level (nwl) and 100 year high -water level (hwl) should be indicated on the plan for the pond/filtration basin. 4.2 Arrows and slopes should be provided on the Final Plans to ensure adequate grade is provided. A minimum 2% and maximum 3:1 slope is recommended for green areas. 4.3 Emergency overflow routes should be clearly labeled to ensure adequate surface overflows are provided. 4.4 An emergency overflow should be provided for the pond/filtration basin at the 100 year high water level. The overflow should be armored with turf reinforcement mat or riprap. Preliminary Plat Application 16-3822 Eisinger Meadows Page 3 5.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: 5.1 General SWPPP Notes should be revised to indicate a minimum 6"topsoil used for re -spread. 5.2 Notes should be revised to indicate perimeter erosion control measures and protection fencing will be installed by Contractor and inspected by City prior to any demolition or land disturbance. Contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection, 5.3 If the proposed permanent stormwater management basin will be used as a temporary sediment basin during construction, additional sequencing notes and linework should be included -as necessary to provide clear direction for installation schedule of perimeter sediment control devices, temporary sediment basin, rough grading and temporary ditching, temporary seeding, utility and street construction, site stabilization (including topsoil re -spread, erosion cotitrol blanket, riprap, and permanent vegetation), removal of perimeter measures, construction sediment removal, outlet control structure installation, and permanent stabilization of the ponds. 5.4 Double sildence must be provided adjacent to wetlands where grading is proposed within 50' of the wetland. 6.0 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN PLAN 6.1 Sanitary sewer and watermain review comments will be provided separately as plan development progresses. 7.0 STORM SEWER PLAN 7.1 Subsurface draintile service connections should be provided for all lots not directly abutting a pond or wetland. Storm sewer layout and Drainage and Utility Easements may need to be adjusted accordingly. 7.2 CBMH-1 should be constructed with a 4' sump to provide pretreatment prior to the pond/filtration basin. 7.3 Cleanouts for the filtration basin underdrain should be provided. Cleanouts should be located above the high water level to limit potential for bypassing filtration system. 8.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8.1 Since common buckthorn is identified in the Conservation Design Master Plan (CDMP) for removal, the Final Landscape Plan should indicate areas of buckthorn removal and incorporate removal guidelines outlined in the CDMP. 8.2 Various proposed tree locations will need to be adjusted to remove conflict with utilities. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. -6za-�4g P-14 Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer AGENDAITEM Item No.: 8 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: #17-3922 City of Orono Text Amendment & Approval of Summary Ordinance for Publication: Wetland Regulations Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Consent Agenda Development Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve minor typographical errors in the approved ordinance and to approve a summary ordinance for publication. 2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. Not applicable 3. Background/ Summary. On May 8', the Council approved changes to the wetland regulations, specifically changes to how and when wetland delineations would be required. After the meeting, staff noted that one word on Line 66 is misused and should be replaced with determination. This change is highlighted in green. An ordinance becomes effective upon publication. Statute allows for the recording of a summary ordinance, when full publication is not practical. The Council must approve a summary ordinance with at least a 4/5ths vote. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion 1. Approval of the Ordinance with changes to line 66 as indicated Motion 2 Approval and authorization to publish summary ordinance as drafted. Exhibits Exhibit A. Revised Ordinance Exhibit B. Summary Ordinance Prepared By: J. Bamhart Reviewed By: J. Bamhart Approved By: D5R Council Exhibit A 17-3922 ORDINANCE NO. 196, THIRD SERIES May 22, 2017 2 3 CITY OF ORONO 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 7 PERTAINING TO WETLAND REGULATIONS 8 9 10 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: 11 12 SECTION 1. Section 78-1603 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 13 follows: 14 15 Sec. 78-1603. - Boundaries of the wetland overlay districts and designation of official city wetland 16 map. 17 This section establishes wetland overlay districts. These districts are subject to additional 18 requirements beyond those required by the WCA. The boundaries of the wetland overlay districts 19 are identified graphically on the official city wetland map (CWM) which is hereby adopted by 20 reference, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city clerk and shall be available 21 for public review during all normal office hours. Wetlands in addition to those shown on the city 22 wetland map may exist, and may be identified by wetland delineations under WCA rules. If a 23 specific wetland delineation has been done under WCA rules, then the boundaries of the wetland 24 overlay district for that location will be as shown in the delineation. The city may require wetland 25 delineations to determine compliance with WCA rules and to determine administrative wetland 26 boundaries; however, property owners may have wetland delineations done for their properties on 27 their own initiative. The delineation must be done by a qualified professional according to WCA 28 rules and be acceptable to the planning dir-eete ci1y administrator, who may require review by city 29 consultants or a technical evaluation panel if necessary. Approved WCA wetland delineations must 30 be provided to the city in a hard copy format and a CAD or GIS format in Hennepin County 31 coordinates. The planning dir-eete city administrator will have the approved WCA wetland 32 delineations shown on the official city wetland map. Public waters are not included in the overlay 33 district, unless a wetland is part of a public water. 34 35 SECTION 2. Section 78-1604 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 36 follows: 37 38 Sec. 78-1604. - Interpretation of wetlands boundaries. 39 Whenever a wetland boundary is disputed or uncertain, the pla+ming dir-eete city administrator 40 may require the submission of a registered survey of the property and field staking showing the city - 41 designated wetland contour or a delineation of the wetland, and such other information as the 42 director may require in order to resolve the dispute or uncertainty. The planning dir-eeter.- �jfty 43 administrator may require review by city consultants or a technical evaluation panel if necessary. 44 No boundary change may be authorized on the basis of fill that was placed on the site after the city 45 designated the area as part of the wetland overlay district. Persons aggrieved by a decision of the 46 planning directo city administrator may appeal such decision in accordance with the provisions of 47 section 78-99 of this chapter and the WCA rules. 48 a. Delineation types. 49 A Tier 1 Boundary determination is a review of known information to determine an 50 understood boundary, and may be used when the proposed project is located on a lot where a wetland 51 is believed to exist, but the project is not likely to iMpact the wetland due to project scope, distance, 52 and/ or topogrgphy. Known information may include aerial photogrgphy, third party studies, and/ 53 or site visits. A Tier I Boundary determinationis not a delineation. 54 A Tier 2 Delineation is a delineation is conducted by a certified wetland delineator and 55 verified by the Local Government Unit. Tier 2 delineation information shall be provided on a 56 certified certificate of survey. 57 b. Delineation required. The type of delineation shall be determined by the City 58 Administrator or their desiganee. 59 Tier I Boundary determinations may be required for accessory structures, accessory buildings, 60 and other projects primarily outside the wetland or wetland buffer area. 61 Tier 2 Delineations shall be required for projects that include a new residential principal 62 structure, a project that impacts the wetland, a subdivision, or a project that otherwise is regulated 63 by the Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rule or Storrawater Management Rule of the Minnehaha 64 Creek Watershed District, unless waived by the Watershed District. A Tier 2 Delineation may also 65 be required for a project proposed at or within 5' of the buffer/ setback line. 66 A Tier I Boundary mgy be substituted for the Tier 2 delineation when 67 the qpplicant can demonstrate the wetland boundga location to the satisfaction of the ci1y and the 68 watershed district, due to topogrgphy, distance of the project to the wetland, site specific features, 69 and known information. 70 71 SECTION 3. Section 78-1605 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 72 follows: 73 74 Sec. 78-1605. - Wetland buffer areas and setbacks. 75 76 (a) This subsection establishes authority for wetland buffer areas around protected wetlands. Buffer 77 areas are necessary and beneficial to maintain the health of wetlands. Buffer areas protect the 78 edge of wetlands from erosion while filtering sediment, chemicals and other nutrients from 79 runoff that drains into wetlands. Buffer areas can improve the biological diversity and health of 80 a wetland environment while reducing the adverse impacts of human activities. 81 (b) All wetlands within the City of Orono are within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 82 (MCWD), which has rules and regulations for the establishment and maintenance of wetland 83 buffers. In an effort to avoid overlapping or conflicting regulations, the city defers jurisdiction 84 for the establishment and maintenance of wetland buffers to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed 85 District. If application of MCWD buffer regulations is in conflict with city regulations, the -me -Fe 86 restrieti Watershed District requirements shall apply. 87 (c) In order to provide for a minimum level of wetland protection where Minnehaha Creek 88 Watershed District buffer rules do not provide for adequate separation between wetlands and 89 buildings or other structures or surfaces, the city shall require setbacks from the delineated edge 90 of a protected wetland as follows: Minimum distance setback from delineated edge of wetland to any building (principal or accessory) or other structure, 91 Areas within the required setback area subject to filling, grading or excavation as part of a 92 construction project shall be revegetated immediately upon completion of such earthwork. 93 Setbaeks must be veiroed with wetiand delineation infet:fnation. The determination of whether- a 94 Level 1 deliaea4ien er- Level 2 delineation is r-e"ir-ed shall be at the diser-etion of the planning 95 dir-eeter-. Level 2 delinea4ion infet=mation shall be pr-ovided on a eet4ified eet4ifieate of sufvey. 96 The requirement for- delineation shall be applied in eases whefe the wedand exists within 150 97 feet of the proposed pr-ojeet-. 98 (d) The City of Orono has established wetland protection strategies in the Orono Surface Water 99 Management Plan (SWMP) (January 2011). A protection classification has been assigned to 100 each wetland in Orono based on the stormwater susceptibility and functional assessment for 101 each wetland. The city has also established additional protection requirements for each 102 classification. The four protection classifications for all properties excgpt those zoned as 103 "residential" are described as follows: hardcover, septic systems or wells: Where no formal buffer exists Additional and where MCWD does not 3 5 feet require a buffer Protection Where a formal buffer exists or 3 5 feet or established buffer width plus 10 feet, whichever is where MCWD buffer is required greater 91 Areas within the required setback area subject to filling, grading or excavation as part of a 92 construction project shall be revegetated immediately upon completion of such earthwork. 93 Setbaeks must be veiroed with wetiand delineation infet:fnation. The determination of whether- a 94 Level 1 deliaea4ien er- Level 2 delineation is r-e"ir-ed shall be at the diser-etion of the planning 95 dir-eeter-. Level 2 delinea4ion infet=mation shall be pr-ovided on a eet4ified eet4ifieate of sufvey. 96 The requirement for- delineation shall be applied in eases whefe the wedand exists within 150 97 feet of the proposed pr-ojeet-. 98 (d) The City of Orono has established wetland protection strategies in the Orono Surface Water 99 Management Plan (SWMP) (January 2011). A protection classification has been assigned to 100 each wetland in Orono based on the stormwater susceptibility and functional assessment for 101 each wetland. The city has also established additional protection requirements for each 102 classification. The four protection classifications for all properties excgpt those zoned as 103 "residential" are described as follows: Additional Protection Requirements Protection Susceptibility Description (B = Bounce Changem Classification Rating water level due to runoff event) (P = Phosphorus) B: Maintain Highly susceptible to bounce at or both quantity and below existing quality impacts from conditions "Preserve" Highly Susceptible runoff, have the P: Limit highest degree of loadings to predevelopment protection loading (0. 14 Lbs/Ac/Yr) Moderately B: Maintain susceptible to bounce at or "Manage V Moderately quantity and quality below existing Susceptible impacts; protection is conditions plus less stringent than 0.5 foot Preserve, provides P: Limit "Manage 2" "Manage 3" 104 Slightly Susceptible Least Susceptible protection to maintain their characteristics Less stringent protection than Manage I wetlands; maintenance of characteristics is desirable Wetlands are significantly degraded (e.g., cultivated or canary grass monotype) or lack of wetland characteristics; not typically impacted by runoff; no quantity and only limited quality treatment of runoff is required loadings to predevelopment loadings times 2(0.28 Lbs/Ae/Yr) B: Maintain bounce at or below existing conditions plus 1.0 foot P: Limit concentration to predevelopment concentrations (200 ppb) B: No quantity requirement P: Limit concentration to 225 ppb 105 The protection classification for each wetland will be found on the "Wetland Management 106 Classification Map & List" which is hereby adopted by reference, a copy of which shall be kept on 107 file in the office of the city clerk and shall be available for public review during all normal office 108 hours. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District required buffer area widths are based on the four 109 protection classifications. 110 III SECTION4. Section 78-1608 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 112 follows: 113 114 Sec. 78-1608. - Standards. 115 The following standards apply to all land within the wetland overlay districts, existing and 116 MCWD-required wetland buffer areas, and to neighboring lands: 117 (1) Proteetion of wetlands. 118 a. Except as modified or regulated by the standards of this subsection, all requirements 119 of the underlying zoning district apply. 4 120 b. No structures are allowed in the wetland overlay districts except those allowed as of 121 right or by conditional use permit by sections 78-1606 or 78-1607 of this article. 122 c. Activities including, but not limited to, building (other than a boardwalk or dock), 123 paving, mowing, vegetation removal, filling, dumping, yard waste disposal or fertilizer 124 application are prohibited. Invasive non-native vegetation, such as European 125 buckthorn and noxious weeds, may be removed by obtaining a vegetation removal 126 permit from the city. 127 d. Before grading or construction near a wetland over -lay dis4 , the owner or contractor 128 must place erosion control fencing on the upland side of the perimeter of the wetland 129 ever -lay dis , or as required by the city. This fencing must remain in place until all 130 development activities that may affect the wetland have been finished and adequate 131 vegetative cover has been established at which time the fencing must be removed. 132 e. All structures must have a minimum basement floor elevation not less than one foot 133 above the 100 -year flood elevation. 134 f. All hard -surface runoff must be treated in accordance with the requirements of the city 135 and the appropriate watershed district. Treatment may include site retention 136 skimmers, weirs or sedimentation ponds of appropriate scale. Structures and ponds 137 serving this purpose must be properly maintained and serviced by the property owner. 138 g. Discharge into the wetlands must occur at a rate no greater than allowed by the city 139 engineer in accordance with the city's surface water management plan and the 140 appropriate MCWD requirements. 141 (2) Protection ofwetland buffer areas. Existing and MCWD-required wetland buffers shall be 142 maintained and protected per the requirements of existing covenants as well as MCWD 143 regulations as administered by MCWD. 144 (3) Nonconformities. 145 a. Effect ofwetland boundary expansion. An existing structure, driveway or parking area 146 meeting the required setback from a city -designated wetland boundary or existing 147 established buffer area is considered a legal nonconforming development if a later 148 wetland delineation or implementation of a wetland buffer shows that the wetland or 149 its buffer is closer than the required setback. 150 b. Existing nonconformities. An existing structure, driveway or parking area that does 151 not meet the required setback from a city -designated wetland boundary or buffer area, 152 is considered a legal nonconforming development. 153 154 SECTION 5. Section 78-1614 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 155 follows: 156 157 Sec. 78-1614. - Authority/enforcement actions. 158 Nothing herein contained shall prevent the city from taking such other lawful action as is 159 necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such actions may include but are not limited to: 160 (1) In responding to a suspected article violation, the planning dir-eete city administrator and 161 the city may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not 162 limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after -the -fact permits, and/or orders for 163 corrective measures to the guilty party. 5 164 (2) When an article violation is either discovered by or brought to the attention of the planning 165 dir-eete city administrator, the planning dir-eete city administrator shall immediately 166 investigate the situation and document the nature and extent of the violation of the official 167 control. As soon as is reasonably possible, this information will be submitted to the MCWD 168 along with the community's plan of action to correct the violation to the degree possible. 169 (3) The planning dir-eete cijy administrator shall notify the suspected party of the requirements 170 of this article and all other official controls and the nature and extent of the suspected 171 violation of these controls. If the structure and/or use is under construction or development, 172 the planning dir-eeto city administrator may order the construction or development 173 immediately halted until a proper permit or approval is granted by the community. If the 174 construction or development is already completed, then the planning dir-eeto �qLty 175 administrator may either: (1) issue an order identifying the corrective actions that must be 176 made within a specified time period to bring the use or structure into compliance with the 177 official controls; or (2) notify the responsible party to apply for an after -the -fact 178 permit/development approval within a specified period of time not to exceed 30 -days. 179 (4) If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the planning dir-eete Kfty 180 administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses shall 181 constitute an additional violation of this article and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The 182 plaFming dir-eeto cijy administrator shall also upon the lapse of the specified response 183 period notify the landowner to restore the land to the condition which existed prior to the 184 violation of this article. 185 186 I I, 1 0191 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of _, 2017 on a vote of — ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2017. CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY9 MINNESOTA SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING WETLAND DELINEATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORONO CITY CODE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on May 22, 2017, Ordinance No. 196 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 196, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the City Council amends the regulations related to wetland delineations: • Identifies a Tier I Boundary determination and Tier 2 Delineation and prescribes when those may be used • When more restrictive regulations apply between the City and the Watershed district's, the Watershed districts regulations shall apply • Removes the distance separation requirements regarding wetland delineations • Identifies the staff person responsible for implementing the Ordinance as the city administrator. A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours or on the City's website. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this day of _, 20—. CITY OF ORONO M ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk 192635vl Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDAITEM Item No.: Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: # 17-3911, Lake West Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Interim Uses Summary Ordinance Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the text of the Summary Ordinance for publication of the Interim Uses Ordinance adopted by the Council on May 8. 2. Application Deadline. (Not applicable) 3. Background. Due to the lengthy nature of the Interim Use Ordinance (Ordinance No. 194, Third Series) adopted on May 8, a Summary Ordinance has been prepared for publication in the official newspaper 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the attached Summary Ordinance for publication. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached ordinance entitled Summary Ordinance No. _, Third Series - An Ordinance Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Code by Adding Article XIVRegarding Interim Uses. Exhibits A — Interim Uses Summary Ordinance B — Excerpt from May 8 Draft Council Minutes Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Mike Gaffron Approved By: D5R SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. _, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE XrV REGARDING INTERIM USES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on May 8, 2017, Ordinance No. 194, Third Series, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 194, Third Series, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the Council amends Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code by adding Article XIV regarding Interim Uses. This ordinance amends the Orono Zoning Code by establishing provisions for allowing temporary use of property until a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it. The ordinance empowers the City Council to grant and to deny applications for interim use permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of such permits. The ordinance establishes application procedures, standards and conditions for approval, and permit expiration and termination parameters. A printed copy of the complete ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this 22nd day of May, 2017. CITY OF ORONO MOM r -rd Dennis Walsh, Mayor Anna Carlson, City Clerk Summary Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of_ 2017 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o"clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT — ALLOW INTERIM/TEMPORARY USES — Continued Walsh stated he does not know if Items C and D are necessary since the Council could limit that at the time of the permit application. Walsh stated in his view Item E is necessary. 93 Walsh moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 194, Third Series, an Ordinance Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Code by Adding Article X11V Regarding Interim Uses; and to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 195, Third Series, an Ordinance Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Code by Adding Section 78-421 Regarding Interim Uses Within the RR -111 Zoning Districts, removing Items (1)c and (1)d as well as the words government sponsored under Item 1. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Printup Opposed. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMTORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, was present. Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting the City approve a permit for interim use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities that are associated with the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. The application can only be approved if the companion application for an interim use ordinance, which has been done tonight. There appear to be few suitable options for the staging area that would have minimal impacts on neighboring properties. This site at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard would appear to score high marks in terms of such a use. This site is open and relatively flat has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard, it is large enough for the intended activities, and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development. The nearest home is 700 feet away across Wayzata Boulevard and the other property is 1000 feet from any homes to the southwest across the freeway so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc., should be minimal as compared to other properties along the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. Gaffron noted the grinding and recycling operation has been conducted in the Wayzata Boulevard right- of-way for the past few weeks. The magnitude of any negative impacts to the adjoining business properties is unknown; although, the Council did hear a little bit about it during the public comments section. The portion of the site for construction staging is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The landfill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and ensure appropriate runoff. The current owners have had significant soil borings done in order to determine the extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. That information was obtained as part of their 2016 development proposal. The area that gained preliminary approval for residential development is not within the proposed temporary staging area. The proposed site use plan indicates a rock entrance for residential development would be located off of Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed site use plan indicates the entrance is located where the proposed Page 10 of 34 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 10 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: City of Orono Text Amendment: Liquor Hours and Days of Off Sale Presenter: Anna Carlson Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to amend city ordinance pertaining to hours and days of sale of off -sale alcoholic beverages. 2. Background. Section 34-126(d) of the City Code currently states that no sale of intoxicating liquor may be made by an off -sale licensee on Sundays. Under the new law, off -sale of intoxicating liquor may occur on Sundays between the hours of I I a.m. and 6 p.m., as of July 1, 2017. The City must allow sales on Sunday, however, the City can limit the hours of sale. The new law does include two provisions that disallow alcohol deliveries to off -sale licensees and order solicitation/merchandising by wholesalers, both on Sundays. Listed below are the licensees in which the new law will effect. Wood Enterprises I Navarre Liquor 3421 Shoreline Drive Off -Sale Voyager Service Centers I O'Sullivan Holiday 2420 Shadywood Road Off -Sale 3.2% 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance as drafted by the city attorney. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the ordinance pertaining to Hours and days of sale of off -sale liquor. Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: MR Approved By: D5R ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 34-126 PERTAINING TO LIQUOR HOURS AND DAYS OF OFF SALE THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 34-126 shall be amended by adding the underlined text to read as follows: Sec. 34 -126. -Hours and days of sale. (a) 3.2 percent malt liquor. No on -sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor may be made between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Monday through Saturday, nor between 1:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on Sunday. Additionally' a Sunday on -sale license may be issued to holders of an on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license, to serve 3.2 percent malt liquor between the hours of 10:00 a.m. Sunday and 1:00 a.m. Mondays with the incidental sale of tobacco and soft drinks, provided that the licensee establishment is in conforinance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. (b) Intoxicating liquor; on sale. No sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption on the licensed premises may be made: (1) Between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on the days of Monday through Saturday; (2) After 1:00 a.m. on Sundays, except as provided by subsection (c) of this section; (c) Intoxicating liquor; Sunday sales; on sale. (1) A restaurant, club, bowling center, or hotel with a seating capacity for at least 30 person and which holds an on -sale intoxicating liquor license may sell intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 12:00 noon on Sundays and 1:00 a.m. on Mondays. (2) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (c) of this section to the contrary, a Sunday on -sale license may be issued to hotels, motels and restaurants which have on -sale liquor licenses, to serve liquor between the hours of 10: 00 a.m. Sunday and 1:00 a.m. Mondays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided that the licensee establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. 1921250 (d) Alcoholic Bevera),,,es off -sale. No off -sale of iatexiea4ing liqu-(w alcoholic beverages may be made by an off sale heensee- (1) On Sundays, except between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.; (2) Before 8:00 a.m. on Monday through Saturday; (3) After 8: 00 p.m. on Monday through Thursday and after 10: 00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday, provided that an establishment may sell intoxicating liquor until 10: 00 p.m. on December 31 and July 3, and on the day preceding Thanksgiving day, unless otherwise prohibited under subsection (d)(1) of this section; (4) On Thanksgiving Day; (5) On Christmas Day; (6) After 8:00 p.m. on Christmas Eve, December 24. (e) Bottle clubs. No establishment licensed under Minn. Stat. § 340A.414 may pen -nit a person to consume or display intoxicating liquor, and no person may consume or display intoxicating liquor between 1:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on Sundays, and between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Monday through Saturday. (f) Delivejy to off -sale licensees. No delivery of alcohol to an off -sale licensee m4y be made by a wholesaler or accepted by an off -sale licensee on Sundqy. No order solicitation or merchandising may be made by a wholesaler on a Sundjjy. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 2017. ADOPTED this _ day of 2017 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of ,2017. 1921250 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 11 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Special City Council Meeting for June 2, 2017 Presenter: Doug Reeder, Agenda Consent Agenda Interim City Administrator Section: 1. Purpose. To set a Special City Council Meeting for June 2, 2017 2. Background. The City Council is being asked to set a Special City Council Meeting for June 2, 2017 at 12:00 Noon to allow the City Council to interview the candidates for the City Administrator position. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that the City Council set a Special Meeting for June 2, 2017 at 12:00 Noon. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to set a Special City Council Meeting for June 2, 2017 at 12:00 Noon. Prepared By: D5R AGENDAITEM Item No.: 12 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Special City Council Meeting for June 3, 2017 Presenter: Doug Reeder, Agenda Consent Agenda Interim City Administrator Section: 1. Purpose. To set a Special City Council Meeting for June 3, 2017 2. Background. The City Council is being asked to set a Special City Council Meeting for June 3, 2017 at 10: 00 a.m. to allow the City Council to interview the candidates for the City Administrator position. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that the City Council set a Special Meeting for June 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to set a Special City Council Meeting for June 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Prepared By: D5R AGENDAITEM Item No.: 12A Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Presenter: Doug Reeder, Interim City Agenda Consent Administrator Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item it to set a public hearing for the establishment of a Lake Improvement District for Carman Bay. 2. Background. On November 14', 2016 the City Council heard a request from Orono residents living on Carman Bay to set up a Lake Improvement District which would allow them to fund improvements to the lake in Carman Bay through the levying of a tax on the abutting residents. At that meeting the City Council passed a motion directing the Carman Bay residents to move ahead with the petition and bring it back to the City Council. In order to set up a Lake Improvement District a petition has to be signed by a majority of the property owners in the district. Steve Nelson, who is heading up the effort to get the required petition, has presented the City Administrator with the required signatures on a petition and is now asking that the City Council take the next step required which is to set up a public hearing on the establishment of a Lake Improvement District for Carman Bay. The full petition with names of the signers will be available at the public hearing, but it appears that there is avast majority of the property owners who have signed. After the petition is verified to have enough signatures and after the public hearing the City council could approve the establishment of the Lake Improvement District and send it to DNR for their approval. 3. Cost There is no direct cost to the city although since the city apparently owns some land on Carman Bay and the City could contribute to the cost of treating the bay. 4. Funding. The cost of treating Carman Bay will be paid through a levy on the property owners. This will not begin until 2018 and any treatment done this year will be through contributions. 5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that Council set a public hearing for June 26,2017 for the Establishment of a Lake Improvement District for Carman Bay. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to set a public hearing for the establishment of a Lake improvement District for Carman Bay on June 26, 2017 at 7PM. . Exhibit A. City Council Minutes of November 14, 2016. B. Map of Carman Bay Lake Improvement District C. Petition for Carman Bay Lake Improvement District Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: Nz MINUTES OF TBE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 14,2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *3. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OF OCTOBER 24,2016 Printup moved, Cornick seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono City Council Work Session of October 24,2016, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *4. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 24,2016 Printup moved, Cornick seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono City Council meeting of October 24,2016, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PRESENTATION 5. CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) Mary Drazen, Rob Roy, Mark Kieper, and Mary Tucker were present from the Carman Bay Lake Improvement District, and Patrick Selter from PLM Lake and Land Management Corporation was present. Mary Tucker stated she has been a bay captain for Carman Bay since 2008. Tucker stated they are here tonight to present information on the Carman Bay LID. The goal is to move forward in the spring with a petition to the Carman Bay residents. Tucker stated the Lake Minnetonka Association and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District cooperatively initiated the "Three Bay Demonstration Project" in 2006 to address concerns among lakeshore owners and lake users that Eurasian Water Milfbil (EWM) and Curly Pondweed (CLP) continue to be problematic in Lake Minnetonka. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources were interested in new technologies and approaches for large-scale, selective herbicide treatments to control EWM and CLP. Following this study, there was continued interest in bay -wide treatments. The Lake Minnetonka Association, the LMCD and the DNR then developed and adopted a Lake Vegetation Plan to guide and frame a five-year bay -wide EWM and CLP control program in Carmans, Grays and Phelps Bays. The funding primarily falls on the lakeshore owners. Public funding has been uneven. Fundraising responsibilities depend to a very large extent on the bay captains. Tucker stated they are here to seek support from the City Council with regard to this project. The first treatment on Carman Bay started in 2008. During that time, the DNR and Army Corps spent two years developing a protocol, which was followed by a very successful treatment in 2010. Treatment was also done in 2011, and by 2012, the bay had basically gone from a lot of milfbil almost down to zero in this time fhame. Another fW1 treatment of the bay was done in 2013. Tucker stated by this time, the residents were getting funding fatigued and so they did not have treatment in 2014 and 2015. The milfbil came back as a result of no treatment. Tucker stated in 2016 they were able to raise enough funds but had to go back to a full treatment. Tucker stated their goal is to have consistent funding to avoid the ups and downs in the treatment. Page 2 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 14,2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. 5. CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LED) (continued) Tucker displayed a graph showing the areas of heavy milfbil infestation prior to treatment as well as a graph depicting Carman Bay following the eradication. Tucker stated the treatment was very successful. Tucker stated LID stands for Lake Improvement District. Lake Improvement Districts were implemented by the state legislature in the early 1970s for three specific reasons, which were to help provide clean water, to manage lake levels, and to control aquatic invasivc: species. Lake Improvement Districts are a means of funding these activities. There are over 40 LIDs in the State of Minnesota. Tucker indicated a LID is formed by a petition from lakeshore residents and those who have lakeshore access. A majority of the residents must approve of the LID. There also must be approvals by the cities affected and the DNR. The DNR then receives and approves the formation of the LID. Once those steps are accomplished, a taxing district will be established for those residents affected. Residents that are affected form a board and decide how the funds collected will be spent. Residents are appointed by the city council for the first year. After that, they will be elected by those affected by the LID annually. The money collected will be spent on the control of aquatic invasive species only. Tucker stated other residents on Lake Minnetonka can form a LID. Each bay must meet the DNR requirements and receive approval by the cities. The main requirement by the DNR is to have public access, such as a beach, fishing pier, or boat launch. Carman Bay would like to institute a LID to ensure sustainable funding in controlling aquatic invasive species. Tucker stated the next slide shows that the DNR has agreed to the Carman Bay definition and the area that would be included in the LID. Tucker displayed a draft copy of the petition. Tucker stated they were successful in 2016 because they started talking about what they wanted to do and began their fundraising efforts in the fall for the spring treatment. Tucker stated they would like to be able to have enough money to be able to do spot treatments going into the future. Council Member Walsh asked how many parcels are involved in the district. Tucker indicated there are 114 parcels. Walsh asked if they need to get 58 of those parcels to form the LID. Tucker stated they have 61 percent participating already in the fundraising and that their goal is to reach 75 percent or higher. Tucker stated everyone was very excited about the LID and that they would like to move forward with it. Walsh asked how many signatures are required from each parcel. Rob Roy, Advisory Board LID Member, stated they require one signature per household. Walsh asked if there is a sunset date on the LID or whether it is permanent. Roy indicated it can be dissolved upon a majority agreement of the residents after it is established. Page 3 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 14, 2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. 5. CARMAN BAY LAKE 1WROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) (continued) Walsh asked who would collect the funding. Roy stated the LID Board that would be appointed by the Council would draft a budget, which would then be presented to the City Council for approval. Following that, the budget would be sent in to Hennepin County. The fee would then be assessed by Hennepin County the following year. Walsh asked what the biggest complaints are that are received from the residents. Tucker stated their biggest issue is an inability to reach people and that everything needs to be in place by. the springtime. Sixty-one percent of the residents are currently in favor and have been funding it. Tucker stated they have attempted to educate the group and hold periodic meetings to answer questions. Tucker stated in her view they have gotten over a few hurdles with the residents and they have witnessed the results from the treatments. Council Member Printup asked how many people would be on the board. Tucker indicated seven. McMillan asked if they have a ballpark estimate for the treatment. Tucker stated they have projected an estimate for next year of $30,000. The following year will be perhaps $20,000, which would be $175 per resident. McMillan asked if they would still maintain the policy of not putting chemicals in front of anyone's property that is opposed to it. Mark Kieper stated they would be following that policy. Council Member Cornick asked where the grants came from. Tucker stated from 2008 to 2013, they received grants from the DNR and the LMCD, which were slowly reduced over the years. Tucker stated after the 5 -year project was done, the residents were pretty much on their own. In addition to the grants, they did receive a $3,000 contribution in 2010 from the City of Orono. Cornick asked what the average grant was. Mary Drazan indicated they varied. Tucker noted the LMCD gave $10,000 in 2008 and 2010. In 2011, the LMCD contributed $9,000 but discontinued the grant in 2012. The DNR was involved until 2013. Comick asked if they feel there will be any future grants available. Tucker stated they do not unless it comes from the state. McMillan noted if the bays are treated every year, in the long term they end up using fewer chemicals. Page 4 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 14,2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. 5. CARMAN DAY LAKE' IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) (continued) Mark Kieper, 2499 Kelly Avenue, stated one of the likely reasons for the elimination of the grants is that more focus is now being placed on zebra mussels. Tucker stated the milfbil does tend to form a dense mat and also decreases property values. Tucker commented they have noticed a difference with the number of boats using the bay as well when the milfbil is being treated. Walsh asked whether high water or low water levels affect the milfbil treatments. Patrick Selter, PLM Lake and Land Management Corporation, Brainerd, stated the water level will impact it and that the chernicals are adjusted depending on the depth of the water. Selter stated they typically do not treat in deep water levels or in areas where there is grass growing. McMillan asked whether the treatment would impact lawn irrigation. Tucker stated to her understanding the residents must wait 24 hours. Selter stated irrigation on straight grass does not have any restrictions but treated water used on any vegetables or food crops can be up to 120 days. Printup asked what some of the negative feedback has been on bays that have been treated. Selter stated the biggest problem is native plant return. Selter stated natives are easier to deal with than the milfbil and that 80 percent of the milfbil vegetation is at the surface. Selter stated they are very careful in how the treatments are done and that they monitor the trends in the lake so they can see if there are any adverse impacts to the native plants. Selter stated they are now seeing on Lake Minnetonka that the plant diversity is increasing and the milfbil is decreasing. Selter stated a lot of people like the treatments but that it takes a couple of years to balance out the natives following the treatment. The areas that do not have consistent treatment can experience spikes in the milfbil. Walsh asked what the feedback has been on Lake Albans Bay. Roy stated the feedback has been very positive and that they have been able to go to treatments every other year. Roy indicated the biggest complaint they receive is the amount of native plants. Walsh stated he would be supportive of getting rid of the invasive species and the City contributing some money. Poehler noted the Council will need to hold a public hearing within 30 days once it is determined the petition is valid. Tucker stated they would like to start the petition now to get a head start for the spring. If approval is received from the Council tonight, they can start working on the petition. Tucker stated they can also then work with the City Administrator on electronic signatures. Page 5 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 14,2016 7:00 o'clock p.m. CARMAN BAY LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) (continued) Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to direct the Carman Bay residents to move forward with the lake improvement district Petition in the next 30 days and bring it back to the City Council for final approval once the signatures are verified. Printup commented he would be interested in hearing from the people who are not in favor as well. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARING 6. CONSIDERATION OF LOCATION RESTRICTIONS, LEVEL III SEX OFFENDERS Community Development Director Barnhart stated over the past several months the City Council has discussed location restrictions for Level III sex offenders. Level III sex offenders are individuals that have committed sex related crimes, have been adjudicated, imprisoned, and have been designated as likely to reoffend upon their release. When a Level III individual is released, the State holds a neighborhood information meeting. Currently there is no city ordinance that provides guidance as to where Level III offenders may reside. Barnhart noted a number of cities are starting to respond to these concerns by drafting ordinances that prohibit residence of Level III offenders within certain distances of parks, schools, daycare centers. The Orono City Council had previously indicated they would like to receive comment from the public prior to moving forward with a formal ordinance. Barnhart stated the public hearing should be opened and then direction provided to Staff on how to proceed. Mayor McMillan opened the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m. Richard Anderson, Crystal Bay Road, stated he has been around the Crystal Bay neighborhood for the last 55 years. The area has changed drastically in the last few years, with approximately 15 new kids as well as seven or eight new families living in the neighborhood. Anderson stated he would like the ordinance to also cover Level I and Level 11 offenders but that he understands it probably will not pass. Anderson stated his main concern is that they do not know who some of these people are that are coming into the neighborhood. Anderson stated they have an issue with people renting out their dock slips to non -Orono residents and that it is possible there are Level I to Level III sex offenders among those people. Anderson stated he knows who his neighbors are but that he does not know who these dock slip renters are. Anderson noted those people who rent out the boat slips are able to get the lay of the land and start to become part of the neighborhood. Anderson commended the City Council for considering this. Mayor McMillan closed the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. Printup asked why it is harder to regulate the Level I and Level 11 offenders. Page 6 of 28 Carman Bay Lake Improvement District CBLID Petition PETITION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A LAKE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT To the City of Orono and Hennepin County: The undersigned property owners are requesting that the City of Orono establish the "Carman Bay Lake Improvement Districr (CBLID) as proposed below. The CBLID is needed to provide an equitable and stable ongoing funding for Carman Bay residents to manage existing aquatic invasive species (AIS), such as Eurasian Watermilfbil on Carman Bay and be positioned to deal with future AIS threats. Voluntarily funded Bay wide treatments in past years including 2016 have been very successful in controlling Eurasian Watermilfbil on Carman Bay. Absent these treatments Eurasian Watermilfoil would dominate Carman Bay to the detriment of property values, recreational water activities, water quality, general health and appearance. The benefits to the property owners as well as outside users of Carman Bay from the proposed CBLID would be improved recreational uses of the Bay, a return to its natural appearance, and providing a healthy Bay for native aquatic species. The Carman Bay Lake Improvement District is needed to provide an equitable and stable source of funding to help continually manage towards a healthier Bay. The proposed boundaries of the CBLID are properties with direct access to the Bay or its covestchannels. The properties defined as "Carman Bay" include all addresses from the west side of the Bay beginning with 3229 Casco Circle, PID 2011723430003 around to the east side of the bay ending with 2800 Pheasant Rd, PID 2111723320004. All of these properties would benefit from the CBLID improvements. The CBLID would have 7 directors, who would be elected at an annual meeting of the property owners. The initial directors would be appointed by the City of Orono- It is requested that the city of Orono provide administrative support and oversight for the CBLID. Property Owner Full Name (only one name required): Carman Bay Street Address: Zip Code, Yes. I aaree to suoDort the CBLID (signature here): AGENDAITEM Item No.: 13 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Westonka Historical Society Update — Pamela Myers Presenter: Pamela Myers Agenda Presentation Westonka Historical Society Section: COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: D5R Approved By: MR 5341 Maywood Road, Mound MN 55364 westonkahistoricalsociety.org 952-474-9800 MISSION STATEMENT The object of the society shall be the collection, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge about the history of the Westonka area and to relate it to the history of the State of Minnesota. SERVING CITIES OF Minnetrista, Mound, Spring Park, Orono, Minnetonka Beach BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jerry Babb, John Bennett, Vern Brandenburg, George Buehl, Sharon Corl, Andrea Dahl, Jeff Magnuson, Pam Myers, Nancy Oestreich, Mary Opheim, Ron Pauly, Debi Tharalson-Heitz, Liz Vandam January – April 2017 BI -ANNUAL REPORT INCOME $ 14,155.41 EXPENSES $ 9,106.36 NET PROFIT $ 5,049.05 Checking/Savings Balance $ 37,250.15 COLLECTIONS—Recent donations: Lake Minnetonka wall maps, 1908 & 1934, donated by Tom Skramstad Mohian Yearbooks, 1965, 1966, donated by Steve Erickson, collection growing from 1923 to present Museum display cabinet, donated by the family of Marty Gilbertson Tonka Toys memorabilia, donated by Dennis David, collection growing to 300+ toys & other items ACTIVITIES Monthly Saturday history talks, Lake Minnetonka Shores (LMS), October 2016—May 2017 Tours: Mound-Westonka Rotary, Lake Minnetonka Shores residents Events: History Boat Tour, Spirit of the Lakes, 2016 "Treasures Uncovered," LMS Saturday, September 23, 2017, 10 -noon SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY *Research for celebration of the 1 00th high school graduating class, Spring 1918 *3 rd Annual 6 th graders' Museum Tour, Grandview Middle School, 100 students *Historian on Minnetrista's City Bus Tour *History displays, at Mound Farmers Market, in the Gillespie Center foyer, at the Hennepin County Library, and at Trista Day and Navarre Day OVERALL GOAL To provide a continuous history of the Westonka area for those who follow after us. GOALS for 2017 *Seek grant funding to develop Collections Management and Procedures Policy and Inventory *Improve marketing of the history museum, increase tour groups, assure funding operating expenses *Develop plan for transition to welcome new board members *Annual report to our cities On back: Website Traffic www.westonkahistoricalsociety.org Monthly history Monthly history 11111AIIIIIIIIII I �� I.. . - -- - - -- - - -- - . - - - . - - - - -- - - -- - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 Month Vniqu�e Number of M Hits, 10� Bandwidth A Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2-016 2016 2016 2016 2016 Month Unique Number o�f M Hits Mar 2017 S66 vi4�;itors visits 5411 524.95 MB Apr 2017 Jan 2016 650 942 3489 11924 3.11 GB Feb 2016 821 1119 2658 8761 760.33 MB Mar 2016 819 1135 2667 7679 450.13 MB Apr 2016 1030 1413 2510 6502 510.11 MB May 2016 1079 1579 3232 83K 512.33 MB Jun 2016 1051 1520 2&43 7329 505.70 MB Ju12016 1182 1726 2937 6950 584.24 MB Aug 2016 1090 1514 2741 6402 481.65 MB Sep 2016 1051 1469 2273 5730 402.04 MB Oct 2016 1258 1850 3216 7509 773.34 MB Nov 2016 1310 20&& 3154 7141 839.8.4 MB Dec 2016 1401 2196 3581 814-4 &28.90 MB Total 12732 1&541 35301 92453 9.60 GB Monthly history 11111AIIIIIIIIII I �� I.. . - -- - - -- - - -- - . - - - . - - - - -- - - -- - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 Month Vniqu�e Number of M Hits, 10� Bandwidth A visitors visits - Jan 2017 1176 1572 3:326 8533 823.47 MB Feb 2017 732 926 2276 6443 418.36 MB Mar 2017 S66 1222 2138 5411 524.95 MB Apr 2017 953 1320 1930 4955 445.86 MB May 2GI7 71 73 99 376 27.27 MB Jun 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Aug 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Sep 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Oct 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Nov 2017 0 0 0 0 0 Dec 2-017 0 0 0 0 0 Tota 1 3798 5113 9769 25718 2.19 GB AGENDAITEM Item No.: 14 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: Annual Public Hearing for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase 11 Storm Water Permit Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is meet the requirements of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit. (MS4) 2. Background. The City of Orono holds a MS4 permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for operation of the City's stormwater drainage system. The NPDES is a national regulatory program under the jurisdiction of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and is administered at the State level by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 3. Requirement. A requirement of the permit is that an Annual Report be prepared and submitted to the MPCA. Staff has prepared the report, and will submit to the MPCA after this meeting. One component of the report is that the City must hold a Public Meeting. The meeting must provide a summary of the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SVvTPP), the activities of the City for the past calendar year in regards to the permit requirements, and must afford the opportunity for public input and comment. 4. Action. There will be a short presentation as part of the public hearing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Conduct a public hearing to receive public input and comments regarding the City of Orono's SWPPP Exhibits A. Presentation Slides Prepared By: /T— Reviewed By: 7E Approved By: D5R C'Ity of Orono MS4 Permit Annual Public Meeting May 22, 2017 Goals of Meeting Educate interested citizens Meet a requirement of the Permit Receive comments from the public on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Stormwater Management Rules and Plans Minnesota Pollution Federal Control Program Agency EPA NPDE,q Municipal State Watershed Separate MPCA Based Program Storm MS4 Permit MCWD Sewer System City Surface SWMP Water Management Plan Environmental Protection Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Local and Global Impacts • Decline in aquatic biodiversity • Habitat loss • Increase flooding • Aesthetics 0 Human health Drinking water quality decline Basic Requirements 0 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) - Best Management Practices (BMPs) 0 Measurable Goals for each BMP 0 Implementation schedule and responsible person 0 Annual Reports 0 Ordinance Development 0 Storm water System Mapping Six Minimum Control Measures 0 Public Education and Outreach 0 Public Participation and Involvement 0 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 0 Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control 0 Post -Construction Storm Water Management 0 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Typical Pollutant Sources Multiple Solutions — But Starts with Individual Homeowner Decisions rce: uean waier �M� J1,10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 Compliance Activities Articles in Newsletters Stormwater information on website Grass and leaf disposal program (spring and fall drop-offs) Construction debris collection Erosion control inspections (City and MCWD) Street sweeping Culvert repairs Watershed / Pond Survey (Long Lake Creek Watershed) Incorporation of Asset Management for Storm Water System 2017 Implementation Activities Watershed / Pond Survey (French Lake (FIR), Lake Classen (I -C), Maxwell Bay (MB), and Stubbs Bay (SB) Subwatersheds) Stormwater inspection of 20% of the Storm System Incorporation of Asset Management for Storm Water System PW Maintenance Operations Begin Storm Water Management Plan Update (In conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan for 2018) Process/Next Steps 0 Record comments 0 Prepare a response to each comment 0 Submit Annual Report to MPCA Questions? AGENDAITEM Item No.: 15 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: #17-3910 Lakewest Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to review a draft resolution for approval of an Interim Use Permit for the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard to allow temporary staging of construction activities associated with Hennepin County's CSAH 112 (Wayzata Boulevard) Improvement Project. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd.: 2/21/17 Complete: 2/27/17 Initial 60 -Day Review Period: 4/28/17 Review Period Extended on 3/30/17 to: 6/27/17 3. Background. The applicants have submitted an application requesting an Interim Use Permit for temporary use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities associated with the Wayzata Blvd. Improvement Project which commenced in April. On May 8 the Council adopted an ordinance amending the zoning code by establishing parameters for Interim Uses generally, and a second ordinance that allows for "Temporary Jaeilitiesfor construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling, when suchfacilities are associated with adjacentpublic road construction or reconstruction projects in the City of Orono " as an Interim Use within the RR- I B zoning District. Update: Current Status of 365 Old Crystal Bay Road Site Use. The contractor for the Hennepin County Wayzata Boulevard improvement project obtained a permit from MnDOT to use a site at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road for the staging and recycling operation for Phase 1 (2017-2018) of the highway improvements. As the project began, the contractor did obtain permission from Hennepin County to recycle materials within the actual Wayzata Boulevard right-of-way, reducing the potential impacts of use of the Old Crystal Bay Road site. This was discussed at the May 8 council meeting. However, on Tuesday May 9 at the weekly construction meeting staff learned that the contractor still intends to use the 365 OCI3 Road site for materials storage and recycling/grinding later this summer. Staff and City Attorney then followed up with the state permitting authorities, and on Wednesday May 10 the contractor was advised by staff that the City will not allow this activity, and gave them a window in which to remove the existing topsoil stockpiled at the site. 4. Review of 1UP for 3245 Wayzata Boulevard. The applicants have requested that their application for IUP approval continue to be reviewed, as they would like to be prepared for use of the Eisinger site for later Phases of the Improvement Project. If an ]UP is approved, it would seem reasonable to allow the use for the remainder of Phase 1. On May 8 Council directed that staff prepare for Council consideration a draft resolution for approval of an Interim Use Permit for 3245 Wayzata Boulevard. A draft resolution is attached, incorporating recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, as well as additional conditions suggested by the Council on May 8th. Council should carefully review the draft language of the resolution, and consider whether it reflects Council's intent. AGENDAITEM The IUP ordinance requires three specific pieces of infort-nation to be submitted as part of the application process, as follows: (a) Written documentation that includes a complete description of the use, schedule for commencement and termination of the use, hours and dates of operation and anticipated employment. (b) Any special studies requested by the City when there is evidence that the proposed use may negatively impact public infrastructure, the environment or adjacent land uses. These studies may examine the impacts on such things as traffic, environment, wetlands and utilities. (c) Evidence of approval or preliminary approval from all other agencies with jurisdiction over elements of the use. As noted in the May 8th staff memo, Items (a) and (c) have been submitted relative to the use for future phases, but not specifically for Phase I of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. With regard to item (b), the City has not requested any special studies to date. Council should discuss whether any such studies or further information should be requested with regard to use of the site for Phase I in 2017-2018 as well as future Phases. 5. Staff Recommendation. Acknowledging that Interim Use Permits are new ground for the City of Orono, staff recommends acting cautiously on this request. It can be argued that the proposed operation is simply the same activity that the City engages in every time we rebuild a City road, but on a larger scale. At the same time, there has been some level of public opposition to this request from adjacent and nearby landowners. Council should review the information provided to date, and discuss with the applicants items of note as well as any additional concerns of the Council. Consider whether an 1UP should be issued for the 3245 Wayzata Boulevard site, and if so, consider adopting or amending the draft resolution attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Review the proposed interim use as presented. - If Council determines that an IUP for this site should be granted, review the draft resolution, make any appropriate revisions, and adopt the resolution. - If Council determines that more information is required, table and provide staff and applicant with specific direction. - If Council determines that an IUP should not be issued for this site, then direct staff to draft a resolution for denial. Exhibits A — Draft IUP Approval Resolution B — Notice of Council Action dated 5/11/17 C — Draft Council Minutes of 5/8/17 D — For Reference: Council memo and exhibits from May 8th meeting Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Mike Gaffron Approved By: D5R CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND MATERIAL STORAGE AND RECYCLING USE PER THE PROVISIONS OF ORONO ZONING CODE SECTION 78-421 AT 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD FILE NO. 17-3910 WHEREAS, LAKEWEST, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter "the Owner") represented by Curt Fretham, is Owner of the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City"), identified as Hennepin County PINS 32-118-23 14 0002, and legally described as: Exhibit A (attached) (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Owner has made application to the City of Orono for an Interim Use Permit (hereinafter "IUP") to allow the operation of a temporary facility for construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling use on the Property, primarily in support of the Wayzata Boulevard Improvement Project being conducted by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, within the RR -IB One -family Rural Residential Zoning District in which the Property is located, "Temporary facilities for construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling" may be allowed as an Interim Use, when such facilities are associated with adjacent public road construction or reconstruction projects in the City of Orono, subject to the provisions of Orono Zoning Code Section 78-421. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS I . This application was reviewed as Zoning File 17 -3 9 10. 2. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. Page I of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The Property is zoned RR -1B One -family Rural Residential District requiring a minimum lot area of 2.00 acres and a minimum lot width of 200 feet. The Property is approximately 26 acres in area of which approximately 13 acres is wetland and approximately 10 acres is a closed landfill. 4. The Property and an adjacent parcel are the subject of City of Orono Resolution No. 6655 which grants preliminary plat approval for a 27 -lot single family residential development within the adjacent parcel and within a portion of the Property. 5. The Owner has indicated that residential development of the Property is now intended to be delayed for various reasons, and has applied for an extension of the effective period of preliminary plat approval per the provisions of Orono Subdivision Code Section 82-117. 6. The portions of the Property to be used for the temporary facility for construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling use are not within the area intended for future residential development, with the exception of the access road which will be developed for the temporary use and used in the future for the residential development. The Owner has obtained the required Temporary Construction Access Permit from Hennepin County. 7. The portion of the site proposed for construction staging is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The landfill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and assure appropriate runoff characteristics. The Owner has had borings done in the landfill area in order to determine the stability and extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. This information was obtained as part of their 2016 residential development proposal. 8. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved an Erosion Control Permit for the construction staging/materials storage/recycling activity. 9. The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no issues with use of the site for construction staging. The Orono Public Work Director has indicated this location is likely as good a location as a road contractor will find for construction staging associated with the Wayzata Boulevard Improvement Project. 10. The site plan suggests that temporary lighting may be employed, and it is possible that to minimize impact on traffic flow, some work on the highway improvements may be at night. It would be appropriate to establish that any temporary lighting be downcast and directed away from residential areas. Page 2 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 11. The submitted site plan indicates a proposed visual and noise -screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. Applicant is working with the MPCA to establish parameters and obtain permits for this berm, which will become an amenity for future residential development. The City will require a grading plan be approved for this, and it will require a Conditional Use Permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. 12. The applicants' narrative suggests that this site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application at its March 20th and April 17t" meetings, and recommended that use of the site should be limited solely to activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and should not be used to support other projects. The Orono City Council concurs. 13. Site physical and location factors which support the intended temporary use include that it is open and relatively flat; it has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard and will not result in traffic impacts to residential streets; it is large enough for the intended activities; and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development (700' to home to the NE across Wayzata Blvd., 1000'+ from any homes to the SW across the freeway), so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc. should be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. 14. Review per Zoning Code Section 78-916. The Interim Use standards require that an 1UP request be considered with respect to the Conditional Use Permit (CLJP) standards of Zoning Code Section 78-916. Following is an analysis of the requested 1UP in relation to those standards. Council's findings following each criterion are shown in bold italics. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Conditional use permit approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: (1) The proposed Interim Use is consistent with the Community Management Plan (CMP). Theproposed temporary use is commerciallindustrial in nature and such use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this residential neighborhood subject to the Interim Use provisions of the Zoning Code and of the RR -1B Zoning District (2) The proposed use is compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by Article V, Division 3 of the City Code. The proposed temporary use is compliant with the zoning standards established for this interim use. Article V Division 3 does not address the specific construction staging useproposed. Page 3 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. (3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. The proposed temporary use is anticipated to be adequately served by existing services andfacilities. (4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system. The needs for water supply and sewage disposalfor the proposed temporary use are not established, and will have to be providedfor by the operators of the site, as municipal sewer and water are not currently available. (5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost. No excessivepublic services orpublic costs are anticipated based on the proposed temporary use. Any costs of monitoring the sitefor compliance will be charged back to the applicant. (6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future. The proposed temporary use at this site if operated under controlled conditions has potential to be compatible with the surrounding area. The site is open and relatively flat; it has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard; it is large enough for the intended activities; and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development (700'to home to the NE across Wayzata Blvd., 1000'+from any homes to the SW across the freeway, so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc. are anticipated to be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. The proposed location of the temporary use does not conflict with the future single-family residential use of the property. (7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The proposed temporary use is bordered on the south, west and north by arterial roadways. The property to the east contains an apple orchard farming operation, separated ftom applicant's temporary use by a large wetland, While the temporary use is not consistent with the character of the surrounding area, its temporary nature is not anticipated to have any long-term effects on the character of the area once the temporary use ceases. (8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The temporary use will not havepermanent structures. The potential permanent change which might impact the character of the neighborhood would be construction of a berm along the southwesterly portion of the site, which would act as a visual barrier to views into the site from US Hwy 12, while providing a sound barrier as a benefit for future residential development of the site. Page 4 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. (9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. Neighboring property owners have expressed concerns regarding the potential for air, water and noise pollution associated with the construction staging and materials storage and recycling temporary uses. However, these concerns will be mitigated by use of state of the art grinding equipment with pollution controls, by the use of erosion management techniques subject to permit approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and by virtue of the remote location of the operationsfrom adjacent properties. (10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses. The location of the proposed temporary use is such that few if any neighboring homes will be subject to undesirable views or views of the activity associated with the use. Therefore, no screening or buffering will be required. (11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means. The temporary useproposed is likely to generate a variety of localized impacts in terms of noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, and general unsightliness. These impacts are anticipated to be minimized and mitigated by the remote location of the proposed activity in relation to inhabited neighboring residentialproperties. (12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. The only access to the temporary use will be from a single entrance to County Road 112. Hennepin County has issued a permitfor that accessfor the temporary use. There are no local streets which would be impacted by traffic from the temporary use, and no local streets would experience parking impacts as a result of the use. Truck traffic associated with the temporary use is anticipated to be almost entirely on Wayzata Boulevard which is a Hennepin County arterial road. (13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. Based on the location and on the existing natural, scenic and historic features present, the temporary nature of the use suggests that no permanent negative impacts are anticipated. Potential long-term environmental impacts relative to the proposed use are anticipated to be minimal if any. Short term effects such as noise, vibration, glare and odor are expected to be relatively minor and due Page 5 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. to the remote location should have minimal impact on neighboring uses. The materials storage and recycling operation will be subject to MCKD and APDES permits to manage runoff. The use of state-of-the-art materials grinding and crushing equipment to minimize dust, noise etc. has been proposed by the applicant. The potential impacts of PAH emissions to the air or water as suggested by a neighboring property owner are beyond the scope of City regulations. Such impacts, if any, are expected to be under thepurview of MPCA regulatory authority. (14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. This will be included in the IUP as a condition of approval. (15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. Potential detrimental impacts to the public health, safety and welfare by the temporary use of the property as proposed are not anticipated. 15. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed interim use permit on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 16. The City Council finds that the Applicants' request would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an Interim Use Permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-421 to allow the operation of a temporary facility for construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling use on the Property, subject to the following conditions: 1. This IUP is for temporary use of the Property in accordance with the site layout submitted by the applicant, attached hereto as Exhibit B. The processing equipment must be located so as to minimize its effect on surrounding property owners. 2. Use of the site shall be limited solely to activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other road construction or similar projects outside the corporate limits of the City of Orono or the City of Long Lake. The processing equipment may only be on the property for the duration of the project. 3. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. Hours of operation to be limited as follows: Page 6 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. M -F: Normal construction hours, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to Noon only, and limited to low-volume in -out activity, no heavy hauling Sunday: No activity whatsoever on Sundays 5. Applicant shall obtain all appropriate required permits from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. Operation of the use shall meet MPCA guidelines re: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and provide dust control from construction and recycling activities. All Federal, State, County and City air, water and noise quality standards must be met. 6. Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site shall not commence until the Applicant has obtained conditional use permit approval from the City of Orono. 7. All exterior lighting associated with the operation shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. 8. This site shall not be used for materials recycling/crushing/grinding operation when other sites within the City of Orono are in use for the same activity. 9. An ongoing 6 -month review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. 10. By accepting this Interim Use Permit, the Applicant agrees: a. to allow the City all reasonable access to the site to perform inspections as the City deems necessary to ensure compliance with the conditions herein; b. to reimburse the City for any costs incurred as a result of enforcing the IUP following violation of any condition of the permit; c. to hold the City harmless for all claims or causes of action that may result from the granting of the IU`P. d. to indemnify the City for all costs, damages or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims. 11. Restoration. The site shall be restored no later than one (1) year after the road project has been complete. Restoration shall include regrading as necessary to restore pre-existing drainage and runoff patterns, and revegetation of the site with suitable ground cover materials. Applicant shall post restoration security with the City in the amount of $10,000 to ensure restoration occurs. Page 7 of 9 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 12. Termination. This Interim Use Permit will terminate on the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever occurs first: a. Completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements (Phases 1, 11 and III) or three years from the date of this Resolution, whichever occurs first. b. Upon violation of conditions under which this permit was issued. If any conditions of this ]UP are violated, the City Council may revoke it on fourteen (14) days' notice to the Applicant, who may request a hearing before the Council with seven (7) days of the City mailing notice to the Applicant. If the Applicant fails to request a hearing within said seven days, his right to a hearing is waived. The City Council may revoke this lUP if the property is found to be in violation of the conditions listed in this interim use permit. c. Upon a change in the zoning regulations, which renders the interim use nonconforming. d. Upon redevelopment of the Property for residential use. e. Upon 30 days' notice to the applicant and after a public hearing the City may revoke the permit without any cause or violation demonstrated. 13. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the applicant and are not transferable except by written permission of the City Council, 14. The undersigned Applicant has read, understands and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution, and hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Applicant day of � 2017. Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 8 of 9 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017, by the LAKEWEST, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, on behalf the Company. Notary Public Page 9 of 9 of NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 952.249.4620 TO: Curt Fretharn Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 curtf@lwestdev.com ZONING FILE: 17-3911 DATE OF NOTICE: May 11, 2017 COPIES: dana@lwestdev.com TYPE OF REQUEST: Zoning Text Amendments to allow Interim Uses DATE OF MEETING: May 8, 2017 Council Exhibit B The Orono City Council voted 4-1 on a motion to approve the text amendments to add Interim Uses as an element of the zoning code, as drafted; and to incorporate "Temporary facilities for construction staging, materials and equipment storage, and materials recycling..." as an allowed Interim Use within the RR -113 zoning district, with minor revisions to the draft text. A copy of the final version of each Ordinance is attached. VOTE: 4 FOR I AGAINST if you desire certified copies of the official City Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Council. if you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at mQafiron@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4622. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. #17-3911 LAKE WE T DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZA. BOULEVARD WEN TE ,VM;ZONING CODE TEXT NT — ALLOW INTEREMVrE RARY USES — Continui Walsh stated he does not know if Items C arenecessarysi e the Council could limit that at the f Item time of the permit application. W7alsh stated �inhi " w Ite is necessary. Walsh moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt ORD 'WANC 0. 194, Third Series,,an Ordinance I Amending the Orono Municipal Zoning Co Adding A� le XIV Regarding Interim Uses; and n nce ding the Or,0 7 U . th r I to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 195, Thir eries,, an Ordinance ending the Orono Municipal S t! 10 a 1 8 n Zoning Code by Adding Section 7 1 Regarding Interim Use I the RR -1B Zoning 8 In is g g .0 Districts, removing Items (I)c (1)d as well as the words overnmeu onsored under Item 1. n on VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, ntup Opposed. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, ]INTERIM USE PERMT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, was present. Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting the City approve a permit for interim use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities that are associated with the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. The application can only be approved if the companion application for an interim use ordinance, which has been done tonight. There appear to be few suitable options for the staging area that would have minimal impacts on neighboring properties. This site at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard would appear to score high marks in terms of such a use. This site is open and relatively flat, has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard, it is large enough for the intended activities, and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development. The nearest home is 700 feet away across Wayzata Boulevard and the other property is 1000 feet from any homes to the southwest across the freeway so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc., should be minimal as compared to other properties along the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. Gaffron noted the grinding and recycling operation has been conducted in the Wayzata Boulevard right- of-way for the past few weeks. The magnitude of any negative impacts to the adjoining business properties is unknown; although, the Council did hear a little bit about it during the public comments section. The portion of the site for construction staging is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The land -fill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and ensure appropriate runoff. The current owners have had significant soil borings done in order to determine the extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. That information was obtained as part of their 2016 development proposal. The area that gained preliminary approval for residential development is not within the proposed temporary staging area. The proposed site use plan indicates a rock entrance for residential development would be located off of Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed site use plan indicates the entrance is located where the proposed Page 10 of 34 Council Exhibit C MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 4"A - P� 14. #17-3910 LANE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, 4P INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued 45,0�, access for the residential development is to be located. That access has been approved by Hennepin County as a temporary construction access for this recycling activity. The Watershed District has approved an erosion control permit for the construction staging activity. The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no concerns with use of the site for construction staging. The public works director has indicated the location is likely as good of a location that the contractor will find for construction staging. The site plan suggests that temporary lighting will be likely employed but that is not known for a fact. In order to minimize traffic flow issues, some work might occur at night and it would be appropriate that any temporary lighting be downcast or directed away from residential areas. The site plan indicates a proposed visual and noise screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is working with the Pollution Control Agency to establish parameters and obtain permits for that permit, which will become an amenity for ffiture residential development. The City will require a grading plan be approved for that and potentially will require a conditional use permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. The applicant has suggested that to make this use financially viable, the site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. The Planning Commission looked at this use and recommended that it should be solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and should not be used to support other projects. The Planning Commission did not want the industrial use at this site to become a regional site and it should have a defmite end date commiserate with the Wayzata Boulevard improvements, which will likely last three or four years. The Planning Commission has reviewed this application on two separate occasions and recommended unanimous approval based on the following conditions: End date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements or three years, whichever is sooner. 2. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. 3. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. The hours of operation are to be limited as follows: Monday through Friday, normal construction hours, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday, 8 a.m. to noon only and limited to low-volume in -out activity, no heavy hauling. Sunday, no activity whatsoever. 4. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. The proposal must meet MPCA guidelines and provide dust control from construction and recycling activities. Page 11 of 34 MINUTES OF TBE ORONO CITY COUNCEL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAVE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued 5. Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. 6. An ongoing 6 -month review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata boulevard improvement project. In terms of public comments, at both the March and April meetings, public comments were received from Alan Engleman generally in opposition to the use of residentially zoned lands for what he sees as a commercial/industrial use. The minutes from both those meetings have been included in the Council packet. In addition, a letter was received from the Dumas family, who owns the apple orchard to the east, objecting to the proposed use at the Eisinger site which abuts their property. The interim use standards require that an 1UP request be considered with respect to the conditional use permit standards of the Zoning Code. Staff s report contains an analysis of the conditional use permit requirements. The requirements address a number of issues. Gaffron recommended the Council review those requirements and see whether they are in agreement. The analysis also discusses consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, adequacy of service by police, fire, and storm water management, etc. It also addresses compatibility with the surrounding area, the need for screening, and the impacts to traffic and lighting. In the draft IUP ordinance text, there are three specific pieces of information that are required to be submitted, and are as follows: I Written documentation that includes a complete description of the use, schedule for commencement and termination of the use, hours and dates of operation, and anticipated employment. 2. Any special studies requested by the City when there is evidence that the proposed use may negatively impact public infrastructure, the environment or adjacent land uses. These studies may examine the impacts on such things as traffic, environment, wetlands and utilities. 3. Evidence of approval or preliminary approval from all other agencies with jurisdiction over elements of the use. The Council should review the information provided and discuss with the applicants any items of note as well as any additional concerns of the Council. If the Council determines that an ITJP for this site should be granted, Staff should be directed to draft a resolution for consideration incorporating the recommendations made by the Planning Commission and any other conditions the Council determines are necessary. If the Council determines that more information is required, the application may be tabled and direction given to Staff and applicant. If Council determines that an 1UP should not be issued for this site, the application should be denied. Seals asked where this property is located. Page 12 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIIL MEETING Monday, May 8, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10, ;6� 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPWINT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, trop, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Gaffron illustrated the location of the property. Gaffron pointed out the landfill area and the area for the future development, the wetlands, the property boundary on the east, the access point, and the apple orchard. Seals asked if there is a way to verify that the contractor is truly only doing things related to this project. Gaffron indicated it would not be a simple process to monitor everything that happens on the property and that the City would likely have to hire someone and require submittal of daily bills of lading for what is brought to the site. Dankey commented this is a good location since it is far enough away from the businesses and residential homes. It is also a good use of a vacant lot. Walsh asked if the applicants are talking about storage or rock crushing or both. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, stated their first priority was to do rock crushing or asphalt recycling for the Highway 112 improvement project but they did not recognize the amount of time it would take for approval. As a result, the contractor started looking for alternatives and then began using the Mn/DOT site. Fretharn stated he is hopeful that use of this site will help alleviate some of the concerns that have been expressed. Fretham stated in their view it is a good site for this type of activity and that they believe they can manage the process well given their experience with other similar projects. Fretham stated he understands there has been concern that product will come in from other locations. Fretham stated if that is not allowed, he would be losing a competitive edge because the contractor is using a taxpayer -owned property free of rent and he does not have to go through the permitting process, which creates an uneven playing field. Ea order to get the contractor to use this site, it is likely they will have to be given the opportunity to bring other material to this site apart from the Highway 112 project. Fretham. noted the contractor would be using the Mn/DOT site for this year and that he will need to incentivize them in some way in order to get them to use this site. Fretham noted he did hear public comments tonight that the contractor was performing the crushing downtown but that he did not hear any of them say it was dusty. Fretham. stated he is looking for approval to perform crushing and storage on the site. Seals asked if the other sites would go away if this site is approved. Fretham stated he believes so. Fretham stated it is hard to get the contractor to agree until he has received approval. Walsh stated the question would be where they would do it if this site is not approved and the Mn/DOT site is not available. Dankey stated if she was a business owner, she would not be happy. Page 13 of 34 AIINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCEL MEETING Monday, May 8, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. t4. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERNffr: TETWORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Seals commented she would rather have it where it is presently located than next to someone's house or an apple orchard. Walsh stated the crushing activity is the bigger issue than the storage of construction materials. Crosby noted a time limit can be placed on this specific activity. Dankey asked if these activities would definitely occur at the site if approval was given. Fretham indicated it is not. Fretham stated they still intend to go through with the residential development that was recently approved at some point, but given the other residential development in town, he felt it would be better to wait. As a result, other uses for the property in the meantime were considered. Walsh stated the crusher is a bigger issue given the dust and pollutants. Printup asked where the activity would take place. Fretham stated the activity would be located on the far west side of the site and the arrows depict the truck route in and out of the site. Printup asked if the soils in the landfill area will support the weight of the equipment. Gaffron stated the Council can ask the developer to provide those studies if they deem them appropriate and that he is not sure if anyone has looked at the carrying capacity of that area. Crosby commented he would be more concerned about the soils once the residential project starts. Fretham stated they have done over 100 soil boring holes as well as other different analyses that an engineering firm is analyzing. In addition, they will be working with the Pollution Control Agency to come up with a cleanup plan for the site. Fretharn stated they do intend to come back at some point with a redevelopment plan for the western portion as well. Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on this application. Allan Engleman asked when he applied for this permit. Engleman stated it looks to be February 2 1. Gaffron indicated that is correct. Engleman noted Eureka obtained the permit for the MnDOT site on February 13 but did not inform anybody, including Staff, until he (Engleman) informed Staff about it on April 4. Engleman commented this was all under the table until February. Gaffron noted Fretham has been speaking with Staff long before February 21 about this project. Page 14 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKF, WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Walsh stated it sounds like' W. Fretham has to go through a lot more permitting than the contractor. No additional public comments were received. Crosby stated in his view this property is a better spot than the Mn/DOT property since the City can set parameters on the use and it is further away. Crosby stated he is not as concerned with the quality of the soil until they are ready to build the residential development. Printup stated he disagrees with the location and that in his view there is no suitable site in Orono. Seals indicated she agrees with Council Member Printup. Walsh stated he has concerns with the apple orchard and the dust. Walsh stated they also have the -Nln/DOT site and the question is whether the City can mitigate that site in some way. Walsh stated he is not in favor of rock crushing in Orono but noted that activity is currently occurring in downtown Long Lake in front of Otten Brothers. Walsh asked if they would be able to get the storage moved to this site but not the rock crushing part. Mattick stated the City can allow it on this site but that the City has limited control over the Mn/DOT site. Walsh stated he would prefer no crushing on this site but that the City cannot tell the contractor not to use the M-n/DOT site, which is closer to the apple orchard. Walsh stated he also is not in favor of other debris from other cities' projects being brought to this site. Dankey noted there is a residential development being constructed right next to the apple orchard as well and that the use will be for a limited amount of time. Dankey stated the permit can also be terminated at any time if the City deems it appropriate. Seals asked Mr. Engleman if he has a preference for which site it would be at. Engleman stated it would be better on the Eisinger property since it would be finther away but noted the Council is concerned about the contamination to the site. Engleman noted the rock crushing will also contaminate the state land. Engleman stated in his view the City should get some money for the rock crushing and that the City should not have to support them. Printup asked where the runoff goes off of the Eisinger site. Gaffron stated whatever runs off the existing Eisinger site goes to the wetlands and that the developer could possibly construct some settling basins to help slow the runoff and help it infiltrate. Gaffron stated if the Council is interested in those conditions, they can be imposed, but Staff would need to look into it. Fretharn stated the black dotted silt fence that goes around the entire perimeter of the site is to control runoff. Fretham noted they have obtained the Watershed permit so they have reviewed the storm water management for the site. Page 15 of 34 F1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued rieumun noted uns would be a recycling operation, and the closer you do we recycling to Tne acaviLy, the less fitel that is used and the fewer emissions. Fretham stated a number of cities are allowing the rock crushing to occur closer to the activity since it cuts down on truck traffic and that he has done this type of operation in much denser neighborhoods in St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, and Nfimetonka. Crosby commented it would also expedite the project if it is local. Crosby indicated he would not be in favor of allowing other projects to come in and that it could be limited just specifically to this project. Crosby stated the rock crushing activity would be better on the Eisinger property than in front of someone's business. Walsh stated they currently have the rock crusher in the right-of-way in front of Otten Brothers but that could be moved in front of the apple orchard or the school at some point. Dankey and Crosby stated the Eisinger property is less intrusive. Walsh stated the goal is to have it as far away as possible from the businesses and residents. Seals commented the City has not really pushed back against M-n/DOT and that the City can at least try to discuss this with Nfii/DOT. Seals stated she is not enthused about having it in Orono at all and that she would not want it next to her house or next to an apple orchard. Dankey noted the residential development is happening right next to the apple orchard. Walsh indicated he is in agreement with working with Mn/DOT but that the Council also needs to provide some direction to Staff. Mattick stated tabling it would allow Staff to speak with Hennepin County representatives and then Staff could draft some language that could be either incorporated into a resolution or a letter. Seals commented she would feel better about that and that she would not be happy if someone just showed up next to her and started a rock crushing activity. Seals stated she would like Staff to speak with ,N4n/DOT to see what can be done to help mitigate things. Walsh stated that would allow the process to keep moving forward as well as allow Staff to obtain additional information. Dankey stated she would prefer the rock crushing not occur in downtown Long Lake but that she also does not want both sites to be used. Crosby stated he would like to get the storage and crushing away from the residents and businesses as much as possible. Mattick noted the highway project is being done in phases and that N1n/DOT would likely not be subject to the City's permit. Mattick stated Staff will need to look into it a little bit. Walsh commented it will be an ongoing process and that the Council will have to look at it periodically. Page 16 of 34 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 8,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 40A 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING. — Continued Engleman noted the permit says nothing about stockpiling dirt and that he is not sure why they are doing it. Walsh stated Staff will be speaking with all the parties involved. Seals moved, Printup seconded, to table Application No. 17-3910, Lake West Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 115.7— #17-3941 LAKE WEST%,PEVELOPMENT, LLC, 4 LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SJ�ETCH PLAN REVIEW Curt Fretham, Lake West Developmelk� was present. Gaff-ron stated this is a sketch plan revie �Yor a proposed 2/ot subdivision of a vacant property located at the northerly end of Ivy Place on Cascot a (nt, �Th: prop currently consists of three tax parcels just totaling over two acres. It is located � t , he & of De nsula. Each of the two lots would exceed the 1/2 - acre minhnurn lot size of the LR- I C district. vacant since it was created by filling the wetli encumbered by a number of easements and d4 easements across the adjoining property at 35 es 1 00 -foot lot width. The property has remained the late 1950s and early 1960s. The property is abut a dedicated public roadway except via Place. It was originally platted as tracts W and ack in 1 �5,Gaffron displayed an aerial photograph of the ri, , _ s property back in the 1950s. A progressi n of ae ial shows how the property evolved through the c to f years, mainly through the placement fill in the area �(the wetlands. By 1967, the area is totally filled in and there are very few trees. In 1 1, the property is g to be filled in with volunteer trees such as buckthorn. In 1975, there was an applicatyn to replat the property from)�eelots to two lots, which is what is being app �Jic cs 0 proposed today. That on was approved by the City il but the property owner never filed the plat. At that time a n er of the nearby neighbors were o osed to the subdivision saying that the area was filled. nar a app n 'Ic e, osed to th In 1975, Orono comp ted a w( tland inventory and identified the en e p 7 erty as wetland. Gaff-ron e rop s a t\e it w - To y stated he is not sure hy it was identified as wetland at that time. T " there is one little wetland .ly I ff approximate 10' 17' and is difficult to recognize as wetland. Gal indicated he spoke with the r DNTR about this operty within the last year and they have indicated the are not opposed to someone building on the /ite. There are a variety of existing easements on and adjacent to the property. TQre is also a sewer line that runs along the southwest shoreline. Gaff-ron noted the City restored that shoreline along with the Watershed District. Some of the easements on the property include an easement for a cul-de-sac, which was never built; a private driveway easement; a roadway easement; a view easement which limits the number, location and height of the homes; and various utility easements. The applicant has approached Page 17 of 34 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 CA Memo [Page I of 5] AGENDAITEM Item No.: 14 Date: May 8, 2017 Item Description: #17-3910, Lake West Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. - Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider the applicant's request for approval of an Interim Use Permit for the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard to allow temporary staging of construction activities associated with Hennepin County's CSAH 112 (Wayzata Boulevard) Improvement Project. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd.: 2/21/17 Complete: 2/27/17 Initial 60 -Day Review Period: 4/28/17 Review Period Extended on 3/30/17 to: 6/27/17 3. Background. The applicants have submitted an application requesting an Interim Use Permit for temporary use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities associated with the Wayzata Blvd. Improvement Project which commenced in April. Because construction staging is not an allowed use in any Orono zoning district and is not a permanent use, the only functional method for approving it is via an Interim Use Permit. The zoning code currently does not contain provisions for Interim Uses. This application should only move forward if the Council approves the text amendments (Application # 17-3 911) to allow for interim uses. Current Status. The contractor for the Hennepin County Wayzata Boulevard improvement project has obtained a permit from MnDOT to use a site at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road for the staging and recycling operation for Phase 1 (2017-2018) of the highway improvements. As the project began, the contractor did obtain permission from Hennepin County to recycle materials within the actual Wayzata Boulevard right-of-way, reducing the potential impacts of use of the Old Crystal Bay Road site. However, the applicants have requested that their application for a text amendment and IUP approval continue to be reviewed, as they would like to be prepared for use of the Eisinger site for later Phases of the Improvement Project. Please review the attached Planning Commission memos, exhibits and minutes. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed this item at its March 20 meeting and again at its April 17 meeting. On April 17 the Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to recommend approval of the IUP for 3245 Wayzata Boulevard subject to staff recommended conditions with modifications, as follows: a. End date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements or three years, whichever is sooner. b. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. 17-3910 May 8, 2017 Page 2 AGENDAITEM Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 CA Memo [Page 2 of 5] C. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. Hours of operation to be limited as follows: M -F: Normal construction hours, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to Noon only, and limited to low-volume in -out activity, no heavy hauling Sunday: No activity whatsoever on Sundays d. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. Must meet MPCA guidelines re: PAHs and provide dust control from construction and recycling activities. e, Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. f. An ongoing 6 -month review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. 5. Public Comments. At both the March and April meetings, public comments were received from Alan Engleman of 315 North Old Crystal Bay Road, generally in opposition to the use of residentially -zoned lands for what he sees as a commercial industrial use. See minutes from both Planning Commission meetings. In addition, a letter was received from the Dumas family objecting to the proposed use in general and specifically at the Eisinger site which abuts their property — see letter in April 17 PC packet. 6. Review per 78-916. The Interim Use standards (if adopted) require that an IUP request be considered with respect to the CUP standards of Zoning Code Section 78-916. Following is an analysis of the proposed JUP in relation to those standards. Note that staff comments following each criterion are shown in bold italics. Staff comments highlighted in yellow are intended to be items for Council to discuss and determine 1) whether they reflect Council's position, and 2) whether they support granting of an IUP for this property. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Conditional use permit approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: (1) The proposed Interim Use is consistent with the Community Management Plan (CMP). The proposed temporary use is commerciallindustrial in nature and such use will be consistent with the CMP guiding for this residential neighborhood if the Interim Use text amendment allowing this use in the RR-lB zone is adopted (2) The proposed use is compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by Article V, Division 3 of the City Code. The proposed temporary use will be required to be compliant with the zoning standards establishedfor this interim use if the text amendments are adopted Article VDivision 3 does not address the specific construction staging useproposed (3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. The proposed temporary use is anticipated to be adequately served by existing services andfacilities. Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 CA Memo [Page 3 of 5] 17-3910 AGENDAITEM May 8, 2017 Page 3 (4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system. The needsfor water supply and sewage disposalfor the proposed temporary use are not established, but would have to be providedfor by the operators of the site, as municipal sewer and water are not currently available. (5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost. No excessivepublic services orpublic costs are anticipated based on theproposed temporary use. Any costs of monitoring the site for compliance would be charged back to the applicant (6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future. Theproposed temporary use at this site ifoperated under controlled conditions haspotential to be compatible with the surrounding area. The site is open and relatively flat; it has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard; it is large enough for the intended activities; and it is relatively remote from nearby residential development (700'to home to the NE across Wayzata Blvd., 1000'+ftom any homes to the SWacross thefreeway, so that thepotential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc. should be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. The proposed location of the temporary use does not conflict with thefuture single-family residential use of theproperty. (7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. Theproposed temporary use is bordered on the south, west and north by arterial roadways. Theproperty to the east contains an apple orchardfarming operation, separatedfrom applicant's temporary use by a large wedand. While the temporary use is not consistent with the character ofthe surrounding area, its temporary nature is not anticipated to have any long-term effects on the character of the area once the temporary use ceases. (8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The temporary use will not have permanent structures. The potential permanent change which might impact the character of the neighborhood would be construction of a berm along the southwesterly portion of the site, which would act as a visual barrier to views into the site from US Hwy 12, while providing a sound barrier as a benefit for future residential development of the site. (9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. Neighboringproperty owners have expressed concerns regarding the potentialfor air, water and noise pollution associated with the construction staging and materials storage and recycling temporary uses. THE CO UNCIL SHO ULD RE VIE W THESE CONCERNS (10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses. The location of the proposed temporary use is such thatfew if any neighboring homes will be subject to undesirable views or views of the activity associated with the use. Therefore, no screening or buffering will be required. Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R 17-3910 May 8, 2017 Page 4 AGENDAITEM Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 CA Memo [Page 4 of 5] (11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means. The temporary use proposed is likely to generate a variety of localized impacts in terms of noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, and general unsightliness. These impacts are anticipated to be minimized and mitigated by the remote location of the proposed activity in relation to inhabited neighboring residentialproperties. (12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. The only access to the temporary use will be from a single entrance to County Road 112. Hennepin County has issued a permitfor that accessfor the temporary use. There are no local streets which would be impacted by traffic from the temporary use, and no local streets would experience parking impacts as a result of the use. Truck traffic associated with the temporary use is anticipated to be almost entirely on Wayzata Boulevard which is a Hennepin County arterial road. (13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize envirom-nental impact. Based on the location and on the existing natural, scenic and historic features present, the temporary nature of the use suggests that no permanent negative impacts are anticipated. Potential long-term environmental impacts relative to theproposed use are anticipated to be minimal if any. Short term effects such as noise, vibration, glare and odor are expected to be relatively minor and due to the remote location should have minimal impact on neighboring uses. The materials storage and recycling operation will be subject to MCWD and APDESperm its to in an age run off. The use of state-of-the-art materials grinding and crushing equipment to minimize dust, noise etc. has been proposed by the applicant. The potential impacts of PAH emissions to the air or water as suggested by a neighboring property owner are beyond the scope of City regulations. Such impacts, if any, are expected to be under the purview of MPCA regulatory authority. (14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. This will be added to the IUP as a condition of approval. (15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. Potential detrimental impacts to the public health, safety and welfare by the temporary use of the property as proposed are not anticipated. In the draft IUP ordinance text, three specific pieces of information are required to be submitted, as follows: (a) Written documentation that includes a complete description of the use, schedule for commencement and termination of the use, hours and dates of operation and anticipated employment. (b) Any special studies requested by the City when there is evidence that the proposed use may negatively impact public infrastructure, the environment or adjacent land uses. These studies may examine the impacts on such things as traffic, environment, wetlands and utilities. (c) Evidence of approval or preliminary approval from all other agencies with jurisdiction Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: DR, Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 CA Memo [Page 5 of 5] 17-3910 AGENDAITEM May 8, 2017 Page 5 over elements of the use. Staff would note that Items (a) and (c) have been submitted (see PC packet information). The City has not requested any special studies to date. Council should discuss whether any such studies or further information should be requested. 7. Staff Recommendation. Council should review the information contained in the Planning Commission packet and minutes, and discuss with the applicants items of note as well as any additional concerns of the Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Review the proposed interim use as presented. If Council determines that an IUP for this site should be granted, direct staff to draft a resolution for consideration. If Council determines that more information is required, table and provide staff and applicant with specific direction. If Council determines that an IUP should not be issued for this site, then direct staff to draft a resolution for denial. Exhibits A — Notice of PC Action dated 4/25/17 B — Draft PC Minutes of 4/17/17 C — Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 4/17/17 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File#] 7-3910 Exhibit A [Page I of'11 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Council CITY OF ORONO Exhibit A 2750 Kelley Parkway ZONING FILE: 17-3910 PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 DATEOFNOTICE: Apr!125,2017 TO: Curt Fretham Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 curtf@lwestdev.com COPIES: danaL@Iwestdev.com TYPE OF REQUEST: Interim Use Permit for Construction Staging, Materials Storage & Recycling DATE OF MEETING: April17,2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to recommend approval of the lUP for 3245 Wayzata Boulevard subject to staff recommended conditions with modifications, as follows: I. End date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements or three years, whichever is sooner. 2. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. 3. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. Hours of operation to be limited as follows: M -F: Normal construction hours, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to Noon only, and limited to low-volume in -out activity, no heavy hauling Sunday: No activity whatsoever on Sundays 4. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. Must meet MPCA guidelines re: PAHs and provide dust control from construction and recycling activities. 5, Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. 6. An ongoing 6 -month review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, May 8, 2017 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at or 952.249.4622. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B MINUTES OF THE [Page I of 8] ORONO PLANNING COM[MISSION MEETING Council Monday, April 17,2017 Exhibit B 6:30 o'clock p.m. 4. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:13 P.M. — 8:43 P.M. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, Applicant, was present. Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting the City approve a permit for interim use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activity associated with the Highway 112 improvement project. There appear to be few suitable options for a staging area for that project and this property scores high marks in terms of this type of use since the site is open and relatively flat, has good accessibility, and is relatively remote from nearby residential properties. Potential negative impacts such as noise, dust, vibration, etc., should be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. Gaffron stated with the assumption that an interim use ordinance is adopted, a list of likely required conditions for this use at any location would include minimum separation distance from nearby structures or lot lines, minimum lot size, road maintenance, traffic control measures, and restricted to government sponsored public improvement projects. Additional site specific conditions should also be considered in approving the proposed construction staging use. The portion of the site proposed for construction staging is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The landfill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and assure appropriate runoff characteristics. The current owners have had borings done in the landfill area in order to determine the stability and extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. The area which gained preliminary approval in 2016 for residential development is not within the proposed temporary staging area. The proposed site use plan indicates the rock construction entrance to be located where the approved future residential access would be located. This access point has been approved by Hennepin County as a temporary construction access. Page 23 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B MINUTES OF THE [Page 2 of 8] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 40Y -w4c The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved an erosion control permit for the construction staging activity. The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no issues with use of the site for construction staging. The Public Works Director has indicated this location is likely as good a location as the contractor will find for construction staging. The site plan suggests that temporary lighting will likely be utilized, and it is likely that to minimize impact on traffic flow, some work on the highway improvements will be at night. It would be appropriate to establish that any temporary lighting be downcast and directed away from residential areas. The site plan also indicates a proposed visual and noise -screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is working with the MPCA to establish parameters and obtain permits for this berm. The City will require a grading plan be approved for this and it potentially will require a conditional use permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. The applicants have suggested that this site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. The applicants should describe what is actually intended and how the contractor or Hennepin County expects to operate this site. One question to be answered is whether it is the City's expectation that this site is intended to be in use exclusively for the Wayzata Boulevard project and not as a regional recycling yard. Gaffron noted a letter from the Dumas family in opposition to the proposed use has been received. Some of their concerns involved the level or type of activity associated with the use, the location of the site, and the duration of the proposed use. If the Planning Commission concludes that the site is appropriate for the proposed use, Staff would recommend that an interim use permit be issued subject to at least the following conditions: Establish an end date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. Page 24 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File#] 7-3910 Exhibit B M[INUTES OF THE [Page 3 of'81 ORONO PLANNING COADUSSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 16� 2. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. 3. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. 4. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, UTCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site, 5. Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. An annual review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. 7. Any other conditions the Planning Commission and City Council determine should be included. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, stated in regards to what this operation will look like, the property consists of 29 acres and is half wetland and half dry. To the east is the wetland area that abuts the Dumas apple orchard. Fretham stated in his view it is kind of a private or isolated property with no neighbors in close proximity. Fretham indicated they have done a recent project in Golden Valley consisting of the demolition and removal of a large commercial building within a residential zone on a 2 -acre site. Fretham stated that was located in a residential neighborhood, with the homes being located approximately 500 feet away. Fretharn indicated they did that project in an environment that did not cause the nearby residents' cars in their driveways to get dusty or the furniture on their patios to get dusty. In addition, a similar project was Page 25 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B [Page 4 8] M][NUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMUSSION MIEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. #4 done in St. Louis Park off of Wooddale. In that situation a church located within a residential area was removed. Fretharn stated in his view they will be able to do a good job at this site without raising a lot of concerns. Fretham noted there will be trucks coming and going but that currently there is a fair amount of traffic at that location and this should not be that noticeable. Fretharn stated given the distance from the residential homes, the noise should not be an issue. Olson asked if they will be operating during the weekends. Fretharn stated be does not know the answer to the question since he does not have that information available tonight and that it is possible the contractor might have to work on a Saturday due to weather. Thiesse stated the crushing activity does not need to occur on the weekends. Fretham indicated he is willing to work with the neighbors' and address their concerns. Fretham stated he is not trying to drive hard bargains and that in his view they can accommodate some of those concerns. Thiesse stated the problem he sees occurring is if the contractor falls behind or wants to complete some work prior to winter and the apple orchard is open. Gaffron asked what type of control they will have over the contractor. Fretham stated they can simply tell the contractor that the site is closed on Saturdays. Gaffron asked what wili happen if the City receives a request for the site to be open on Saturday. Fretham stated the contractor could stockpile on Saturday and haul on Monday and that in his view it is not a critical element. Thiesse asked what end date he is envisioning. Page 26 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File#] 7-3910 Exhibit B [Page 5 of 81 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. w Fretharn indicated he is fine with having the end date coincide with the end of the project along ! ith annual review. Lemke asked if it would be a deal breaker for him if this interim use would be for the highway improvement project only. Fretham stated part of the issue is about leverage. Fretham stated having an interim use permit and having the right to bring in materials from other projects would help him negotiate with the contractor. Lemke noted one of Staff s recommendations is to limit it to the Highway 112 improvement project only. Fretham stated he does not know if it makes sense to do this without outside materials being brought in. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Thiesse stated as it relates to Item 1, the end date should be upon substantial completion or three years, whichever is sooner. Landgraver stated that sounds good. Thiesse asked if that is substantial completion as stated in the subcontractor's contract. Gaff'ron stated under the Phase I contract, the permit for the MnDOT site goes until the end of July, 2018. Thiesse asked how the Planning Commission feels about allowing materials from other sites to be hauled to the site. Leskinen indicated she is not in favor of taking in any other material. Page 27 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B MINUTES OF THE [Page 6 of 8] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. N N �90 r W J It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to not allow any other outside materiaJs besides tho!!P,% '40��from the Highway 112 improvement project. Thiesse noted No. 3 deals with hours of operation, noise, lighting, etc. Fretham stated he does not anticipate lighting but that it was put in there in case the contractor wanted it so they did not have to come back. Thiesse stated downcast lighting would be no different than a parking lot. Olson asked what the hours of operation would be. Gaffron indicated Orono's normal construction hours are 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on the weekends. Thiesse and Olson indicated they would like Saturday and Sunday to be off. Frethain stated he is fine with that condition as it relates to the crushing activity. Olson commented traffic would be a concern on the weekends. Fretham noted he would like to be able to use the site for storage and that if the contractor is laying pipe on a Saturday and needs one more piece of pipe, it would be nice if he could retrieve it from the site. Fretharn stated it could be limited to no hauling of materials, which would be heavy traffic. Landgraver stated his recollection regarding the concern with the apple orchard is that fall is peak season for them and that he had the understanding the applicant was amenable to restricting traffic on the weekends. Thiesse stated if the contractor is one pipe short of finishing, he cannot see stopping them from getting the pipe. Page 28 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B MINUTES OF THE [Page 7 of 8] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke suggested the hours be restricted from 8 a.m. to noon on Saturday. Fretharn stated that would probably be easier. Tbiesse noted there would be nothing on Sunday and 8 a.m. to noon on Saturday for retrieving of materials only. Thiesse asked how the Planning Commission feels about Item No. 4. Leskinen asked if the public health concerns raised by the Dumases relating to the toxins is something covered by the NIPCA. Fretharn stated he is sure there is some guideline for it and some agency that would be in charge of it but that he has not come across it in his prior projects. Fretharn stated it is probably part of one of the permits they have to apply for. Lemke stated he would assume the MPCA would have control over that. Leskinen asked what items are in place to keep the dust under control. Fretham commented technology has come a long way and that the equipment has spray bars that spray water onto the debris to control the dust. Thiesse noted No. 5 deals with construction of the berm. Fretharn stated the berm will be constructed but that he will need to come back for a separate conditional use permit for it. Thiesse stated Item No. 6 is the condition that an annual review of the interim use permit shall be conducted. Leskinen stated she would not mind seeing something more frequent, such as a 6 -month review. Page 29 of 72 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit B [Page 8 8] MINUTES OF TH ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 40A Landgraver commented there might be seasonal issues that come up and that a 6 -month review seems reasonable, especially since this is the first interim use permit the City will have issued. Lemnke moved, Landgraver seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3910, Lake West Development, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, granting of an interim use permit for staging of construction activities associated with the Highway 112 improvement project, subject to Staff's recommendations and the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 5. #17-3918 RE LARSON ON BEHALF OF BILL TOLES, 10 FERNDALI ROAD WEST, VARL4,NC AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, 8:43 M. — 9:02 P.M. � C Jean Rehkamp Larson, Applicant, Charles Fendlayer, Architect� we present. Curtis stated the owner of the property is '�7 sting the follo ariances in order to construct a new residence: r W�4 Lot area, lot width, lake setback, hardeove wi 1 75 feet of the OHWL, and average take setback. In addition, conditional use permits e requested for site grading in excess of 500 cubic yards for mitigation of areas of the prop bel the I percent annual chance floodplain and to allow a full bathroom within the propo d detache garage. t Ib i sa 0 c n 0 f k a e p h u e r s p e 0 d r p c p 0 0 0 pv e d w s b d e th t ar h rm e eta e ch w e 7 e in re t q 5 u h g e e a f e s r t Ie e ag t pd e e 0 r -f f t 0 CC r e w Al j t The currently proposed footprint is depic d in orange and is si ted further back from the lake and j 9 oriented on the property for improved e views by neighbors than as the previously approved plan. j j This property has had a number of iance approvals which are still v. id until November of 2017. The �4 original plan is shown in /blueo e overhead. The applicants' request for ardcover, lake setback, and average lakeshore setba variances results in the 'tJ e property's inability to c orm to the administrative approval provision in Section -72 regarding lots of record. Therefore, the area and width variances are also required to develop this prop Page 30 of 72 Date Application Received: 2/21/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 2/27/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 4/28/17 (Extended to 6/27/17 an 3/30/17) To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator From: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Date: April 17,2017 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page I of 38] Subject: # 17-3 9 10, Lake West Development, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard Interim Use Permit: Temporary Use for Construction Staging Continued Public Hearing This item was tabled at your March 20 meeting for further consideration. Note that the contractor for the Hennepin County Wayzata Boulevard improvement project has obtained a permit from MnDOT to use a site at 365 Old Crystal Bay Road for the recycling operation for Phase 1 (2017-2018) of the highway improvements. However, the applicants have requested that their application for a text amendment and IUP approval continue to be reviewed, as they would like to be prepared for use of the Eisinger site for later Phases. Attachments A — Notice of Planning Commission Action 3/30/17 B — Letter Received from Marilyn Gabert (Dumas Family) 4/5/17 C — Memo and Exhibits of March 20 PC Meeting D — Draft PC Minutes of 3/20/17 Council Exhibit C CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 TO: Curt Fretham Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 2 of 38] NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ZONING FILE: DATE OF NOTICE: COPIES: dana@lwestdev.com 17-3910 March 30, 2017 Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 TYPE OF REQUEST: Interim Use Permit for Construction Staging, Materials Storage & Recycling DATE OF MEETING: March 20 2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted 5-0 on a motion to table the application for further consideration. VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, April 17, 2017 This is a Planning Commission meeting. The meeting begins at 6:30 PM 60 -Day Extension Notice. The current deadline for City action on your application based on the February 27 application completion date is April 28, 2017. Because the earliest possible date for final Council action will not occur until after April 28, the City is extending the time period for City action on application #17- 3910 under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(fl. Please note the time period for action on this application is hereby extended an additional 60 days until June 27, 2017. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. if you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at or 952.249.4622. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 3 of'381 April 5, 2017 Dear Mike Gaffron and the Orono Planning Commission members, This letter is in regard to #17-3911, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard and Curt Fretham's request for an Interim Use Permit to allow construction staging, materials and equipment storage and materials recycling at that location (the old Eisinger property). I am writing this letter to represent the concerns of my parents, Robert & Kathryn Dumas. They are the owners of Dumas Apple House and are the immediate neighbors to the east. We realize you are dealing with two separate issues. The Planning Commission and City Council have discussed adding language to your ordinance to handle requests for an I nterim Use Permit as there is no language now to address this request. The other issue is actually discussing whether an Interim Use Permit should be issued to Mr. Fretham. We would like to address the second issue. We have quite a few concerns with allowing Mr. Fretham to use his property for construction staging, material and equipment storage and materials recycling — gravel crushing. Rather than list all the storage and staging we will from here on in just say, "gravel crushing" to encompass everything but in fewer words. 1) Allowing a gravel crushing site on that property is not consistent for the uses which the property is guided in the comprehensive plan. Neither the current Orono zoning nor the Long Range Land Use Plan allow for a gravel crushing facility on this parcel of land. Possibly some of you and/or your predecessors worked very hard on these plans and the results were carefully arrived at for a reason. 2) Some of you may feel that this is a less populated area than other potential gravel crushing sites, but those of us that are on the neighboring properties are not any less important. 3) The Orono Preserve development (our neighbor to the east) has already sold four lots/houses and I'm sure will sell several more this spring. We would think new home owners could be in their houses possibly within the next year. The four current buyers and any potential buyers may know nothing of the proposed gravel crushing site. We would think they would have concerns about a gravel crushing site so close to their newly purchased home in a residential neighborhood. 4) There is talk of other debris being brought in to this site, not just the asphalt from the Hwy 112 project. Would there really be a way to monitor, regulate or control what else is brought in? 5) Do you know if there would be any burning of any type of materials at this site? 6) Would there be any melting of any type of materials at this site? 7) Noise is an issue. Heavy machinery and gravel crushing makes quite a bit more noise than a residential neighborhood. Also, Mr. Fretham has stated that some of their gravel crushing and work will be done at night. Day time noise is bad enough, but night time noise of heavy equipment and gravel crushing would definitely not be welcome. From the Orono Code of Ordinances Section 58-119, (b) Maximum noise levels by receiving land use districts. No person shall operate or cause or permit to be operated any source of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level outdoors exceeding the dB limit set in table 1 for the receiving land use district specified. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 4 of'381 Your ordinance states, the maximum noise level for residential land use district is 65 dB(A) — (which means, A -weighted decibels). Sounds levels associated with heavy construction equipment range from 80 to 120 dB(A). 8) We also have concerns about lighting. There are three rather large looking proposed spots for lighting on the preliminary site plan. The gravel crushing machine will also likely have lights on it and any vehicles will have their headlights on at night. All these extra lights on at night, and some lights on vehicles moving around, can be quite disturbing. 9) moving heavy equipment and running a gravel crushing site can cause unwanted vibrations to neighbors. How far will the vibrations travel? We don't really know. it is a concern. 10) Dumas Apple House is open to the public every fall. The traffic safety on Wayzata Blvd is something we are worried about. Mr. Fretham has said that the heavy truck traffic will be in spurts. Some days there might be no trucks or traffic going in and out of his proposed gravel crushing site. He said some days there may be 50 — 100 trips to the site a day! That means double that number allowing for ingress and egress? So, it could be 100 — 200 trips back and forth in front of the Dumas Apple House? With all of our Apple House customers pulling in and out of our facility, that is quite a safety concern. 11) The Hwy 112 project is starting at the east end of town, and this proposed gravel crushing site is at the west end of Hwy 112. Since we are right next to the proposed gravel crushing site, the heavy truck traffic could be going past the Dumas Apple House for the duration of the entire Hwy 112 project. We have read that the Hwy 112 project could last 3-5 years. 12) Recycling is a good thing, but we do not think this is a spot for a gravel crushing plant. it seems like there are a lot of downsides and negative issues attached to this request in return for the financial gain of one company. 13) Environmental and public health concerns regarding use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) "The bitumen binder used in asphalt paving applications contains a relatively large concentration of a family of organic compounds which can have the potential to pose human health and environmental concerns in certain circumstances especially when asphalt material is ground into very small particles that easily blow off of or wash from the surface. These compounds, known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are specified as targeted pollutants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and are present in asphalt at relatively high levels for general use in a loose fashion on land. Lead has been observed in RAP samples, with the greatest quantity in old RAP samples, likely as a result of vehicle traffic and emissions. Asphalt millings used alone without a paved top surface have the potential to significantly migrate from the roadway through the actions of water, wind, and physical displacement and possibly contaminate surrounding soils and/or surface water sediments. Traffic traveling on the unpaved asphalt millings; would generate dust containing the compounds referenced above and the dust would be a major migration route of the asphalt millings to the surround environment." Reference: compiled by G.Keller 6/12/2013 14) Bitumen definition: a black viscous mixture of hydrocarbons obtained naturally or as a residue from petroleum distillation. It is used for road surfacing and roofing. 1S) We have 30 acres of apple trees at the Dumas Apple House. Itisa hugeconcernto have PAI -Is dirt & dust pollutants in the air next to a farm that produces food consumed by humans! Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 5 of 38] 16) Public Health Statement for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). "This Public Health Statement is the summary chapter from the Toxicological Profile fo polygyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It is one in a series of Public Health Statements about hazardous substances and their health effects. This information is important because this substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on the dose, the duration, how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are present." This statement was prepared to give you information about Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and to emphasize the human health effects that may result from exposure to them. This information is important because exposure to PAHs may cause harmful health effects and because these sites are potential or actual sources of human exposure to PAHs. When a substance is released from a large area, such as an industrial plant, or from a container, such as a drum or bottle, it enters the environment. This release does not always lead to exposure. You can be exposed to a substance only when you come in contact with it. You may be exposed by breathing, eating, or drinking substances containing the substance or by skin contact with it. - If you are exposed to substances such as PAHs, many factors will determine whether harmful health effects will occur and what the type and severity of those health effects will be. These factors include the dose (how much), the duration (how long), the route or pathway by which you are exposed (breathing, eating, drinking, or skin contact), the other chemicals to which you are exposed, and your individual characteristics such as age, sex, nutritional status, family traits, lifestyle, and state of health. 17) We are certainly concerned with the health risks to all our customers at Dumas Apple House and concerned about any potential liability issues that could arise from this. 18) If you issue an Interim Use Permit for a gravel crushing plant at 324S Wayzata Blvd, please remember that you setting a precedent. All future decisions on Interim Use Permits will be based on what you allow at this time. It would be one thing to allow someone to have a place to, for example, run a business for a political campaign in a residential district for one year. It is completely another thing to allow someone to have construction staging, material and equipment storage and materials recycling — gravel crushing and excavation in a residential district for three to five years! 19) We ask that you seriously consider all of our concerns before you make a decision to issue an Interim Use Permit for a gravel crushing facility at 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Sincerely, Marilyn Gabert, daughter of Robert & Kathryn Dumas, property owners of Dumas Apple House, neighboring property to Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard. Marilyn Gabert PO Box 323 Boulder Junction, WI 54512 mgabertC&centurytel.net Date Application Received: 2/21/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 2/27/27 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 4/28/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Conm-iission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Mike Gaff-ron, Senior Planner March 20, 2017 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File # 17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 6 of'381 # 17-3 9 10, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard Interim Use Pen -nit: Temporary Site Use for Construction Staging Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicants are requesting that the City approve a permit for interim use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard for staging of construction activities associated with the County Road 112 (Wayzata Blvd.) Improvement Project expected to begin in 2017. This application can only be approved if the companion application for establishment of an Interim Use Ordinance is approved. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of an Interim Use Permit for this site subject to specific conditions. List of Exhibits ExhibitA Application Exhibit B. Preliminary Site Plan and Proposed Use Narrative Exhibit C. Public Works Director Comments Exhibit D. Fire Chief Comments Exhibit E. MCWD Permit Exhibit F. Hennepin County DOT Permit Exhibit G. Plat Map Exhibit H. Property Owners List Background The applicants received preliminary plat approval for a 27 -lot residential development of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard in July 2016. Pending more favorable market conditions, they have chosen to not proceed immediately with the residential development. However, they have requested to be able to allow temporary use of the site as a staging, storage and materials recycling yard for the upcoming CR 112 (Wayzata Blvd) improvement project. The highway improvement project, under the auspices of Hennepin County, is being done in phases, and could take up to 4-5 years for completion. Staff for the last few months has been receiving inquiries from contractors searching for a staging area for the highway project. There appear to be few suitable options. This site would appear to score high marks in terms of such a use: Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 7 of'381 #17-3910 3245 Wayzata Blvd. March 20, 2017 Page 2 It is open and relatively flat; It has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard; It is large enough for the intended activities; It is relatively remote from nearby residential development (700' to home to the NE across Wayzata Blvd., 1000'+ from any homes to the SW across the freeway, so that the potential negative impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, etc. should be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor. Interim Use Permit Conditions Under the assumption that an Interim Use ordinance is adopted, and an Interim Uses listing is added to the RR -IB District standards which includes the proposed use (potentially listed as "Construction staging, materials and equipment storage and materials recycling"), it is anticipated that a list of required conditions for the use at any location will also be listed, such as: 9 A minimum separation distance from nearby residential structures or lot lines a Minimum lot size a Requirements for site and adjacent road maintenance, and traffic control measures a Allowed only for government sponsored public improvement projects Additional site-specific conditions should also be considered in approving the proposed construction staging use. Planning Commission should review the applicants' narrative describing the intended activities to be occurring on the site. The portion of the site proposed for construction staging at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard is primarily over the closed landfill area of the property. The landfill has been closed for many years and is relatively open and flat. Layers of cican fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and assure appropriate runoff characteristics. The current owners have had borings done in the landfill area in order to determine the stability and extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. This information was obtained as part of their 2016 residential development proposal. It should be noted that the area which gained preliminary approval for residential development is not within the proposed temporary staging area. The proposed site use plan (Exhibit B) indicates the proposed rock construction entrance to be located where the approved future residential access would be located. This access point has been approved by Hennepin County as a temporary construction access (see Exhibit F). The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved an Erosion Control Permit for the construction staging activity (see Exhibit E). The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no issues with use of the site for construction staging. Orono Public Work Director Adam Edwards has indicated this location is likely as good a location as the contractor will find for construction staging (see Exhibits C & D). The site plan suggests that temporary lighting will likely be employed, and it is likely that to minimize impact on traffic flow, some work on the highway improvements will be at night. It would be appropriate to establish that any temporary lighting be downcast and directed away from residential areas. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 8 of 38] #17-3910 3245 Wayzata Blvd. March 20,2017 Page 3 The site plan indicates a proposed visual and noise -screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. Applicant is working with the MPCA to establish parameters and obtain permits for this berm, which will become an amenity for future residential development. The City will require a grading plan be approved for this, and it potentially will require a Conditional Use Permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. The applicants' narrative suggests that this site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than. just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements (see Narrative). This could put a different slant on how the site is intended to be used. The applicants should describe what is actually intended, and how the contractor or Hennepin County expect to operate this site. Will materials from other projects outside Orono be brought onto the site and not used for Wayzata Blvd. purposes? Will materials from the Wayzata Blvd. project be recycled and head out to other projects not in Orono? Is it the City's expectation that this site is intended to be in use exclusively for the Wayzata Blvd. project and not as a regional recycling yard for other projects? We do not want this industrial - level use at this site to become a regional activity, and we want it to have a definite end date commensurate with the end of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. Public Comments No comments for or against the proposal have been received to date. Issues for Consideration Does Planning Commission have any specific concerns with the location of this site for the proposed use? Does Planning Commission have any specific concerns with the level or type of activity that is likely to be associated with the proposed use? Is the use intended to be specific to the Wayzata Boulevard improvements, or is it intended for other projects? Does Planning Commission have any specific concerns with regard to the duration of the proposed use — is 'the date of completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements' a suitable termination date for the activity, or should it be further limited, such as requiring an annual review and/or annual approval of an extension? Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation If Planning Commission concludes that this site is appropriate for the proposed use, staff would recommend that an Interim Use Permit be issued subject to at least the following conditions: 1 Establish an end date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. 2. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. 3. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. 4. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, NIPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 9 of 38] #17-3910 3245 Wayzata Blvd. March 20, 2017 Page 4 5, Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. 6. An annual review of the interim use pera-lit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. 7. Any other conditions that Planning Commission and Council determine should be included. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 10 of 3 8] City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application PC Exhibit A StreetAddress: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 mx: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Applicabon # /7-39/e Date Received a7—ao staff Fee- $700 Escrow $700 / NA Notes U Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: akeko 1q1VL1-'555�P DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: I sheets APPLICANT INFO Wc-heck here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: .5 f - Phone (Primary): .-. 1�36M Mailing Address: 11;'5kf1-fi -V '7 alk* "476.5- City: ZIP: Email: [AJARE! , cain r1(y 14 05 " 1)1 -de Y, (7 oy-�,l PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 9-c'heck here if Property Owner is same as applicant /I � 13 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing n4ame: X,"')T- Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: ITIZ V *MOT C 19- A N- �14 A ffi L Email: fl) I rA4�0 III fzh--+Ho i "I'q V" -.1A I A e-1 r%J11 i , 1, APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: ZIP: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hisiher knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. 0 Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Information will be distributed viapmi Applicant Signature: Z��( Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: CUP Application - January 2017 Page 4 Date: I 1/eb/ -7 Date: Date: Date: RECEIVED FEB 2 12017 #3910 CVTY OF ORONO Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page I I of 3 8] L A K E �SMT DEVELOPMENT, LLE Conditional Use Permit Application Narrative 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, Orono, MN 55356 PID:3211823140002 February 21, 2017 Overview Construction and demolition materials are recognized as one of the largest components of the solid waste stream in the United States. Recycling this material not only makes sense economically, but keeping this material out of landfills makes sense environmentally, as it's a smarter use of resources, saves energy and provides a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of on-site, or near -site recycling operations, further savings are realized in efficient use of vehicles, fuel and manpower, reduced wear on adjacent roadways, and better containment of construction impact from surrounding areas. County State Aid Highway 112 Project is scheduled to begin the spring Of 2017 and continue through 2019. The property owned by Lakewest LLC, located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West in Orono, offers an ideal near -site staging and recycling location for this project. It is isolated between Wayzata Boulevard (Old Highway 12 or Highway 112) and the new Highway 12 in an area with few neighbors. It provides easy access, ample acreage and minimal preparation to become ready for the contractor. Over the past several years Lakewest has successfully established and operated similar recycling sites in the cities of Golden Valley, Minnetonka and St. Louis Park. Lakewest LLC is seeking a Conditional Use Permit and an Ordinance Text Amendment to allow the establishment of a staging and concrete/bituminous recycling site at this location. We appreciate the City of Orono's help in completing and submitting these Applications and look forward to playing a part in this significant infrastructure improvement for the cities of Orono and Lonci Lake. Curt Fretham CEO, Lake West Development, LLC Office: 952-653-134 FEB 2 12017 CITY OF ORONO Lake West Development 114525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 1 Phone 952-930-3000 # 3 9 10 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 12 of 38] Conditional Use Permit Application A. Contact Information OwnerotRecord Lakewest, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Minnetonka MN 55345 Phone 952-930-3000 AuthorizedAgent Curt Fretham, CEO Lake West Development LLC, 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka. MN 55345, Phone 952-930-3000 S. Site Data Address 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Orono, MN 55356 Zoning RR -1 B One Family Rural Residential Parcel Size 25.8 acres 1, 123,933 sq. ft, PID 3211823140002 Description That Part Of Government Lot 1 In Section 32 Township 118 Range 23 Described As Follows: Beginning At A Point In The East Line Of Said Section 32; Note: This Is A Partial Metes & Bounds Description. C. Land Characteristics The entire property consists of approximately 28.8 -acres of vacant land and a former residence situated between Highway 12 and old Highway 12 (also called Wayzata Bluebeard and Highway 112) just West of Long Lake. Access to the property is on the north from Wayzata Boulevard The parcel is made up of roughly 13.6 acres of wetland, 5.2 acres of currently developable, non -wetland buffer area, and 10.2 acres of former landfill. Lakewest has been working with the IVIPCA to determine cleanup requirements for the 10+ acres of former landfill — the area has been tested extensively and is currently undergoing further environmental analysis. In 2014 the site received preliminary plat approval for Eisinger Meadows, a 26 -lot detached townhome development with an additional 24 -unit apartment building under consideration as a second phase. Lakewest has decided to delay this development to allow other developments in the area to become established. D. Intent of the Project In anticipation of the County State Aid Highway 112 Project #091101 the property owner intends to establish a site for environmentally sound processing and recycling of recoverable demolition and construction materials related to CSAH1 12 and other projects. A Conditional Use Permit is sought to allow staging equipment, stockpiling materials, processing and recycling aggregate and bituminous materials, along with associated construction activities. RECEIVEL'i FEB 2 1.1017 CrrY OF ORONO CUP — Page 2 of 3 # 3 9 10 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 13 of 38] Conditional Use Permit Application E. Zoning (For Ordinance Text Amendment) The property is Zoned RR -1B, One Ramily Rural Residential, and guided for high-density multi -family residential development. In order to allow the allow the site to be used for staging equipment, stockpiling materials, processing and recycling aggregate and bituminous materials, and other construction activities an Ordinance Text Amendment is requested. F. Staging & Recyclin The staging and recycling activities will occupy approximately 5 acres of the total property (see site plan). Access to the site will be provided from Wayzata Boulevard (Highway 112 or Old Highway 12) at the location established in the Eisinger Meadows Preliminary Plat. A culvert per county specifications will be installed and a gravel access road at least 24'wide will be constructed. A temporary rock stabilization pad of 4-6" of recycled 3" minus concrete will be constructed to accommodate the recycling equipment. Two stockpiles, one for raw materials and one for finished materials will be located at either end of the recycling equipment, truck traffic flowing counterclockwise within the site. Lakewest is currently working with the MPCA to obtain permission to fill an area that will support a large visual and noise - screening berm along the western and southern borders as a buffer to Highway 12. The proposed berm will later be seeded and landscaped as an amenity for the future development. G. Recyclin & Processinq Operations The contractor operating the site during the CSAH 112 project will be responsible for: Installing and maintaining access to the site in accordance with local governing authorities Furnishing and maintaining erosion control devices as specified by local governing authorities Providing sweeping and dust control services as specified by local governing authorities, County and/or land owner Providing traffic control as directed by local municipality and/or County Providing temporary and final turf establishment as required by local governing authorities Maintaining a safe and clean construction site as directed by contractor's in-place safety program Establishing hours of operation in conformance with local municipality Establishing a lighting photometric plan as directed by local municipality and/or County (if required) H. Reclamation Plan At the conclusion of the CSAH1 12 Project aridlor other recycling projects, the site will be restored to the same, or better, condition as it is now. The temporary rock stabilization pad and stockpiles will be removed and the (potential) large perimeter berm will be seeded and landscaped. Eventually the site will be used to create Eisinger Meadows according to the original vision. RECEIVED CUP — Page 3 of 3 FEB 2 12017 ov% CITY, OF ORONO #391U LEGEND :1 FAN MONUMENT FOUND VALM POLE FIN HYDRANT D(ISTING COWMR OVERIF-0 on lWA7MAIN SANTARY SENN STORM SEWER 02FRING I'DICE EXMW ELEVATM SO& BMW ELECIM wm�sw "S wmvm REPIRESINIS THE TAG= TREE NUMBEIR nlOM A TREE INVENTORY SUPPLED TO US FROM OUR CLIENT. — — — — — — DRAINAGE a UTILITY DSDW SEMCK LINES: PROVIDED WEILAND BUFFER AREA WEILAND IMIMCM AREA SCIL NORM CATCH BASIN SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES FENCE GRAVEL CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL EXISTING TREE LK I'llopm LINK SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WKRR MW OW"A SINADE TREE OMDUOUS SHRUS PROPOSED CONTOUR XIMLI PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION. SANTARY SEWER k-WATERMAIN N= - I, ALL PC WATERMAIN SHALL BE AWWA C-900 OR C-905 DRIS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL PVC SANMARY SEWER SHALL BE SIDIR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3 ' SANITARY SERVICES SHALL 13E 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40, 4 WATER sw&-Es SHALL BE i I TYPE v coppER WqH 1, CORP. 5: CWRAC`= SHALL IWALL HYDRAW EXTENSIONS AS NMESSARY WHERE WIM HAS BEEN LOWERED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH OTHER UTILITIES. OMDWNS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL To HYDRANT COST. 6- ALL SERVIlCES SHALL 13E VaENDED 10' BEYOND PROPERTY LINE 7. ALL HYDRANTS AND VALVES SHALL BE EOUIPPED WITH STAINLESS MM BOLIS CORE BLUE OR EMJIVA-MT FLUOROCARBON COATED BOLTS SHALL 13C USED FOR ALL WALTERMOUN FITTINGS. B. ALL DIP Wm SHALL 13E POLY WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL POLY MID POLY TAPED AT ALL JOKM S. ALL PVC & HDIPE WATERMAIN & ALL SERVICES SHA� BE L410 WFIH TRACER WIRE PER CITY STANDARD DETAIL PLATES. WALL HYDRANTS 5 FEET BEHIND CURB, 12. 6" OR 12" HYDRANT OITMIONS ONLY. IF HYDRWr EXTENSIONS ARE USED, ME VALVE NUT El(TENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED. CORN= 70 El' ---- ------------------------------ ------ 7 ---- --- CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC WAYZA!�'A B't--VD I -F04 I- - - - - - - - - - - F L Lail, L - F- L F - MH 4 \L /10-:�;;\LHVD W/ E 0 @.4 Pula Nu( NE wiftw/ F L6 "A -v 0 CIA Engin—irg 6 Land PlannIN l000 Pklww Crea cobr. P.Ck la 249 ad Ift Pkfi% MN OLVIS W, 763-472-M72 I= 753-479--4242 E -w* wasrokolowrown=Lc or r4port bw b� pqm by me w uRd- MY Wdwt WPM AdM OW that 1 0" a P=r;jFAgll— umdw lhftr.Pot41,. Item #14 - CCAgenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 14 of 38] CONNELT TO EXISTING SANMUIY SERI MH - 5 MM7L44 0' TYP w X, C A, g" < v. i 2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PC Exhibit B 6+13 111L. X1 L ZrA C -r I Nck Is rrp-- - ow -App: 2. ACCess - ie-imvaL z4,'v4jf)F—,-rA4fT-jc_ � 3. CONSM O -TION jEtjTR4WX- - TOC14' (kew CUL, grAr5w7-A-noti FAD- Tt-Rpmw� -RAW NAMEPJA�- 7. :5 1 LT FF44eC- e. 3cReuk i Kc-% rU FFOP,- Irl . T-c-MMF'ltfzy Weslw(Nc-T RECEIVED FEB 2 12017 # 3 9 10 CITY OF ORONO EISINGER MEADOWS LAKE WEST, LLC ORONO.MN PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER & #ROJEcT —No'- WATERMAIN PLAN 15-039 - rATr— SHEET NO. 5 OF 12 SHEETS 03/23/2016 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 15 of'38] Mike Gaffron From: Adam Edwards PC Exhibit C Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 10:33 AM To: Mike Gaffron; David P. Martini CC: Robert Bean; Soren Mattick, Jeremy Barnhart; James Van Eyll; Correy Farniok Subject: RE: Orono Zoning Applic #17-3910 & 3911 - Eisinger Site Mike, This lot seems to be as good a place as the contractor is likely to find in the corridor to stage for the CSAH 112 Project, PROs + Access directly to a county road / the one they will be working on. Doses not require the use of city streets for construction traffic. + The site is remote from any residential areas. Is sandwiched between a county road and the ha state highway. Mitigates some of the noise dust... issues with such a site. CON -Adjacent to wetlands. Their erosion and sediment control will be critical but can be handled with the appropriate permits and best practices. I can give you more formal comments if you need. Adam From: Mike Gaffron Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 9:54 AM To: David P. Martini <davidma@bolton-menk.com>; Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Robert Bean <bobbe@bolton-menk.com>; Soren Mattick <smattick@ck-law,com>; Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; James Van Eyll <jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov>; Correy Farniok <CFarniok@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Orono Zoning Applic #17-3910 & 3911 - Elsinger Site Dave, Adam, et a I — Lakewest has submitted two applications regarding the Eisinger site at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard: 1) for a code text amendment to establish an interim or temporary conditional use option within the code; and 2) for a CUP to allow temporary use of the site for construction staging for the Hennepin County Wayzata Blvd improvements. I've attached their submitted information and am looking for your comments regarding whether this is a good idea, and what pitfalls or concerns might be lurking out there, etc. This goes to the Planning Commission on 3/20, so would appreciate your thoughts early next week. Thanks! Mike From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Mike, Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 16 of 38] James Van Eyll <jvaneyl 1@ long lakemn.gov> Friday, March 10, 2017 10:51 AM Mike Gaffron Re: Orono Zoning Applic #17-3910 & 3911 - Eisinger Site I don't see any issues from a fire stand point. James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneY1I(a)IonR1akemn.gov ko On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:53 AM, Mike Gaffron <MQqffron@.ci-orono.1iiu.a6> wrote: Dave, Adam, et al — PC Exhibit D Lakewest has submitted two applications regarding the Elsinger site at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard: 1) for a code text amendment to establish an interim or temporary conditional use option within the code; and 2) for a CUP to allow temporary use of the site for construction staging for the Hennepin County Wayzata Blvd improvements. I've attached their submitted information and am looking for your comments regarding whether this is a good idea, and what pitfalls or concerns might be lurking out there, etc. This goes to the Planning Commission on 3/20, so I would appreciate your thoughts early next week. Thanks! Mike Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 17 of 3 8] MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER 0 UA LITY 0 F Li F E PC Exhibit E March 1411, 2017 Lakewest Development LLC Attn: Dana Brumitt 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55356 RE: Notice of Conditional Approval for MCWD Permit Application No. 17-095: Erosion Control: Other, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, Orono, Minnesota 55356 Dear Ms. Brumitt: Thank you for applying for a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit for Erosion Control located at the above-mentioned address. The review of this application has concluded, and the MCWD has determined the above-mentioned permit application to be complete. Therefore, the application is approved with the following conditions: 1. Submission of financial assurance for erosion control 2. NPDES Permit Number and Coverage Card Once the above-mentioned materials have been submitted and all permit conditions have been met, staff will issue the permit. You are reminded that work on the project cannot begin until the permit has been issued. The approval expires one year from the date of this letter. If final municipal approval of the project results in changes to the project, you must submit revised plans to the MCWD for review. Please contact me at rworkin@Rmail.con-, or (952) 641-4518 if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Rachel Workin Permitting Technician CC: City of Orono staff Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 18 of 38] Mike Gaffron From: Rachel Workin <rworkin@minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 14,2017 238 PM To: Dana S. Brumitt; Jack Distel CC: Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: MCWD reqtcling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Attachments: 17-095 Conditional Approval (signed).pdf Hi Dana, Great! This project has been conditionally approved pending receipt of the items outlined in the attached letter. I will follow up with materials related to the attached items shortly. Kind regards, Rachel Workin Permitting Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Direct 952.641-4518 MINNEMAHA CREEK 15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345 WATERSHED MMCI www.minnehahacreek.org From: Dana S. Brumitt [mailto:dana@lwestdev.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:34 AM To: Rachel Workin <rworkin@minnehahacreek.org>; Jack Distel <Jdistel@minnehahacreek.org> Cc:'Mike Gaffron'<MGaffron@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Re: MCWD recycling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Thank you, Rachel. The completed forms are attached. Our accountant will call today and make the payment by phone. I can confin-n that the silt fence will remain up for the duration of the project. I appreciate your help. Dana LAKE EPT OEVELIFNENT, LLE Dana S. Brumitt I Communications +1.952.653.1359 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File # 17-3910 Exhibit C dana@lwestdev.corn [Page 19 of'38] From: Rachel Workin <rworkin0minnehahacreek.arf> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:38:33 AM To: Jack Distel; Dana S. Brumitt Cc:'Mike Gaffron' Subject: RE: MCWD recycling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Hi Dana, Thank you for sending along the calculations for the project at 3245 Wayzata Blvd. This project is exempt from MCWD's Stormwater Management and Wetland Protection rules, since it's new development that creates less than 20% of impervious surface across the parcel. You will need an erosion control permit from MCWD which is a fast-track permit. The site plan that you previously submitted contains the required material, so if you complete and return the attached forms, we can get your permit processed for you. There is a $10 application fee that can be paid by check as well as Visa/MasterCard by calling our front desk at 952-471-0590. We did have one question- can you confirm that the silt fence will remain up throughout active construction until the site is stabilized? I also wanted to mention that this project is considered new development since there are currently no improvements on the property. With this work, any future development will be considered redevelopment under our stormwater management rule. Please let me know if you have any questions, Kind regards, Rachel Workin Permitting Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District H" Direct 952.641.4518 MINNINANA CR19K 15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MINI 55345 WAT62SHM OWNCT www.minnehahacreek.or From: Dana S. Brumitt [mailto:dana@lwestdev.com] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 12:21 PM To: Jack Distel < distel@minneh�haq[eek.org> Subject: Re: MCWD recycling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Jack, I've done some calculations on the recycling site to determine the hardcover. The entire site is 25.8 acres. For purposes of the recycling operation we will be constraining our activity to an area within the site of approximately 8 acres. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 20 of 38] All hardcover will be gravel. No solid concrete pads or impervious liners will be installed. For the sake of calculations I've included both stockpiles as depicted in the sketch, although in reality these will be quite variable and will fluctuate as raw materials are processed and reused on the County Road 112 project. I have also calculated the entire area between the stockpiles and the stabilization pad as vehicles will be driving in and out of that area. The total maximum hardcover for the area of activity is just over 2.0 acres. (-25% of the area of activity, or .07% of the site) The 24" wide gravel access road = 984 sf Raw materials stockpile = 10,000 sf Finished material stockpile = 15,00 sf Stabilization pad = 27,000 sf Traffic pattern area = 37,500 sf Thanks so much for following up. We are going before the Orono Planning Commission next week, so it would be helpful to have either a permit or a letter stating that no permit is necessary by the end of the week. Dana LAKE MST OEVELIPMENT, LIC 7' D2na S. Brumitt I Communications +1.952.653.1359 dana@lwestdev.com From: Jack Distel <Jdistel@minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 11:21 AM To. Dana S. Brumitt Subject: MCWD recycling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Dana, After carefully looking over the plans for the recycling center at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West in Orono we have come to understand more clearly what the watershed district needs. As the site is a temporary installation it quite unique but our main concern is the storm water potential of the site and how this could impact the surrounding wetlands. Would you be able to calculate the amount of impervious surface on the site and what percentage this is compared with the site in total? MCWD considers compacted gravel surfaces as impervious, therefore we are looking for this calculation to include the area of things like: I. The access road 2. The stabilization pad 3. The stockpiles 4. Any other impervious surface to be installed on site. Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 21 of 38] Once we have this information we should be able make more informed decisions on permit requirements. Thank you for being so patient with us. Best, Jack Distel District Representative Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka BLVD Minnetonka, MN 55345 952-641-4581 MINNIHAINA CRIEK WATUSHED MUM? Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C 3/1/2017 Hennepin County RtfPennit - UJD# 246 1 Permit# 2017-A304 [Page 22 of 38] Application for Temporary / Const Access Permit Hennepin County Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Department (Roads and Bridges) - Operations 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 PC Exhibit F Permit#., 2017-A304 Road: 112 Maintenance District: Hennepin County Permilt is for the construction of Temporary (Temporary) - Construction, surfaced with Gravel Applicant Property Owner Name: Dana S Brumitt Name: Lakewest LLC Address: Lake West Development Address: 14525 Highway 7, Sufte 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345-5534 Minnetonka. IVIN 55345 Phone: (612) 718-9213 Phone: (952) 653-1359 Pager: Fax: Email: dana@lwestdev.com Dates Entrance Needed By: 05101/2017 Contractor Name: Lakewest LILC Address. 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: (952) 653-1359 https://roadpermits.co.hennepin.mn.ustentmnee.view.php?entmcePermitld=246 . 1/4 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C 3/112017 Hennepin County Rt/Permit - UIDI 246 / Permit# 2017-A304 [Page 23 of 38] L*CaUO,T The pnVoSed entrance is on the S Side of county road no, 112, 0.8 miles W of Old Crystal Bay Road. Street Addre= 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Orono Driveway Width. 20 feet Present number of driveways: 0 Sketch * Orono CUP Site Plan.pdf Descripition of Work Provide vehicle access to staging/recyclIng site fbr CSAH 112 Project General 1. No work shall be started until the application Is approved and the permk Issued, 2. Contact the Hennepin County Permit Office at 612-596-0339 a minimum of 2 business days prior to starting construction. 3. After driveway construction is completed, persons requesting the installation must notify the Permits Office that such work has been completed and Is ready for final inspection and acceptance by Hennepin County. 4. No changes or alterations In entrances may be made at any time without written permission from the County Engineer or designee. 5. Approval of this permit does not deny the County Engineer the future right to revise, relocate or dose any entrance to expedite the movements of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The County retains the right to close said entrance(s) at its discretion, based upon the necessity for traffic regulation, control and safety. 6. Existing driveways are not automatically perpetuated, In the event of a change in land use or a major change in the traffic pattern of the existing facility, new drTveway appilcations may be required by the County. 7. Inclement weather shaff be reason for delay of the project start or suspension of the project as determined by Hennepin County. 8. Perrnits or copies shall be kept on the work site, while work Is in progress, in the custody of the Individual in charge, and shall be exhibited upon request by any county official. 9. These general permit requirements and specifications shall be considered as forming an integral part of each and every permit issued fbr operations an oou* roadways. The work authorized by this permit shall be done at such time and in such manner as shall be consistent with the safety of the public and shall conlbrm to all requirements and standards of the County of Hennepin as herein specified. If at any time. it shall be found by Hennepin County that the work is not being, or has not been, properly performed, the Permittee, upon being notified, shall Immediately ta ' ke the necessary steps, at their own expense, to place the work in conformance to said requirements or standards. In addition, no residential driveway may exceed 22 feet in width and no commercial driveway shall exceed the width dictated by the Hennepin County Access Management Guidelines. 10. In the event of failure or neglect will or not, by said Permittes or Permittee's employees, to porlbrFn and comply with the prescribed conditions, restrictions and regulations, the Transportation Department may revoke and annul this permit and order said Permittee to immediately remove any and all structures or property belonging to said Permittee from the legal limits of the roadway or county property. 11. The Installation shall be made in conformity with all applicable lam, regulations and codes coveeing said Installations. Ali installations shall be made Inconformity with regulations of govemmental agencies for the protection of the public. 12. Americans with Disabilities Act - Any work in the County's rights-of-way that Impacts any pedestrian facilities requires that the restoration of the pedestrian facilities impacted be restored In cDnfbrm to current ADA requirements and standards. 13. If pavement, roadway or right -of way Is damaged; same shall be restored, in a tinnely manner to its original or a better condition, at the sale expense of the Permfttee. Permitteels fallure to correct such damage in a timely manner will result in Hennepin County, through its own forces or contractors, making said repairs and billing ParTirtittee far all costs and expenses related thereto. Permittee shall make payment to Hennepin County within fifteen (15) days of receipt of said bill. Permittee agrees that If it fails to make payment of said amounts within the specific time, to Hennepin County, it shall pay all costs relating to debt collection, including, but not limited to, court costs, frees, interest and attorneys fees. 14. No driving onto highway from ditch or driving on shoulders or over curbs where damage will occur. httpr//roadperiWts-CO-bgDnqin.mn.tlsfenlronm.view.php?cnimneeParmitici-246 . 2/4 3/14017 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C Hennepin County RVNrmit - Ul D# 246 / PerWtO 2017-A304 [Page 24 of 38] 1 6."It shall be further underAood that the Permitles will be responsible for maintenance or repair of any and all failures due to settlement erosion. ladc of vegetation growth, rutting or otheT job related problems for a period of three (3) years after projed completion and Notice of Wbrk Completion fbrm has been received by Hennepin County� Permittee shall perform all said maintenance. Immediately after it has been notified of sold deficiency. Permiltee shall be responsible for all costs and expenses related to said maintenance. Parmktee!s failure to perform sold maintenance immediately will result in Hennepin Count through Its own fo=s or fts contractom, performing said maintenance and billing Parrrdttee for all costs and expanses related thereto. Pemftttee shall make payment to Hennepin County within ftfleen (15) days of receipt of said bill. Parmtttee agrees, that If it falls to make payment of said amounts within the specified time, to Hennepin County, Parmittee shall pay all costs related to debt collections, including, but not limited to, murt costs, fees, interest and attorneysfees. 16. Emergency Vehicle Accesses must be signed and closed to general traffic at all times. Continued unauthorized use of an Emergency Vehicle Access shall result in the removal of the access at the discretion of Hennepin County at the owner's expense. 17, Unless stated elsewhere In the Special Provisions, all access permits expire 1 year fmrn the date that the permit Is Issued. Sediment Control & Drainage 1. Stmet surface and roadifide shall be kept dean, neat and presentable throughout construction as determined try the Hennepin County Transportation Department. 2. Dust control shall be provided upon request of the Hennepin County Transportation Department. 3. The e)deffng drainage pattems shall not be aftered unless approved by Hennepin County Watershed District approval and drainage calculations are required If plan alters existing drainage patterns. 4. Permanent restoration plans must be submitted to the Perafits Office for temporary restorationtwinter stabilization for work occurring between November 1 at and April 30th pdor to starring construction. Traffic Control 1. If the installation of this driveway makes it necessary to work on the roadway, traffic must be protected; proper temporary traffic control including lights, signs and prope r barricades must be In place, Temporary traffic contmi must conform to the current version of the Minnesota Manuel of Unifbrm Traffic Control and/or accompanying Field Manual. Said devices shall be rernoved from the job site promptly upon completion of work. 2. Safety vests shall be worn by ANYONE occupying County right-of-way. 3. The Permittee shall use due diligence in the eimcution of the work authorized under thils permit in order not to endanger or unnecessadly obstruct travel along the said highway. Operations shall be so conducted at all times as to permit safe and reasonably free travel over the roads within the limits of the work herein preselbed. Allsafety measures for the free movement of traffic shall be provided by the Permittse at Its own cost. Payment method Payment details Cradft Card 5DSCiai r Special provisions: Temp/Construction Access $100.00 Total: $100.00 Contact Mike Olmstead at (612) 221-7162 or via email at michael.oirnstead@henneplin.us at least 24 hours pdor to construction. Temporary traffic control layouts on County roads shall corrforrn to the most n3cent version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Applicant shall be responsible to place a stop sign, minimum size of W'x36", prior to opening the new entranoe. Notes: No notes httpaJImadpermils-COJ=RePin.mn.uskmmncc.view.php?cntmnceF%rndiad-246 3/4 31112017 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C Hennepin County Rt/Pennit - UIDO 246 / perwdtf 20 17-A304 [Page 25 of 38] Approval Digital Signature ApplIcant Dana S. Brumitt - 02/28/2017 12:53 PM Of5db98la53ble5e643blcl36dabod66 72f f 4d1cSe41028b6e&aaf 87038c0la #1 Permits Supswisor Michael D. Olmstead - 03101/2017 7.34 AM 2d7lb3b65OadfdeGlCd&265fd79737be 405r-bcf&97b27bddlS39fd549lceo647 https:tfma*rmitaxa-hannopin.mn.uslentrancc.view,php?en"neepermitld=M 4/4 Item #14 - CCAgenda - 0510812017 F'le #1 7 �'p9,fgqV gof � V E D Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Fr --B 2 " 20 17 ti natim. 9/9-1�-.7'n17 Uutterblze: 350 feet Map Comments: 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Orono MN 55356 3211823140002 RECEIVED FEB 2 7 2017 CITY OF ORONO 0 245 490 980 ft I I I I I I I j I For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis-info@hennepin.us #3910 !bit C,- AL meno aiong jine to i Item #14 - CCAgenda - We AveryO 7bmplate 51600 Feed Paper expose popup Ed "'AVERYO r,960 I .'bi 38 32-118-23 11 000i 38 33-119-23 32 0005 g2*e7,f38] BARBARA LUPIENT CITY OF ORONO C/O LU PIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP P 0 BOX 66 7100 WAYZATA BLVD 4200 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 PC Exhibit H 38 32-118-23 13 0001 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR OF R/W OPERATIONS 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD STPAUL MN 55155 38 32-118-23 13 0003 ANNE MAHDAL BARAN 480 STUBBS BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 14 0001 LAKEWEST LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7 #265 MINNEONKAMN 55345 38 32-118-23 14 0002 LAKEWEST LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7 #265 MINNEONKA MN 55345 38 32-118-23 21 0006 B N & SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 38 32-118-23 41 0002 MARGARET A BUSCH 8588 CHESHIRE PKWY 42217 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 33-118-23 23 0002 ROBERT E. & KAT14RYN G DUMAS 3025 WAYZATA BLVD BOX 607 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 31 0010 B N & SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 961089 #3910 FORT WORTH TX 76161 38 33-118-23 32 0002 B N & SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT IF" 2 7 Zo 17 PO BOX 96 1 o8q FORT WORTH TX 76161 CITY OF ORONO lhiquettes faciles A peler I A Repliez A la hachure efin do IF Utillsez Is gabairit AVERYO 51600 11 Sons de wwvv.avery.coTn 4 chargernent r6v6ler le rebord Pop-upml 1 -800 -GO -AVERY Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 28 of 38] MI?9UTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ' M nday, March 20,2017 � 6:30 o'clock p.m. PC Exhibit D Fretham stated the road contractor is hoping to Fretham stated tabling it to April is fine but tat Schoenzeit seconded the-mdffou. VOTE: 0. ffTMay would be ideal to get approvals. June or July would be challenging. 6. 17-3910 LAIKEWEST, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:17 P.M. — 8:02 P.M. Curt Fretham, Lakewest, LLC, was present. Gaffron stated for the last few months Staff has been receiving inquiries from contractors searching for a staging area for the upcoming highway project. Currently there appear to be few suitable options and this site is an option since it is open and relatively flat, has good accessibility to Wayzata Boulevard, is large enough for the intended activities, and is relatively remote from nearby residential development. The home located across Wayzata Boulevard is 700 feet away and the site is 1,000 feet from any homes across the freeway. The potential negative impacts, such as noise, vibration, glare, dust, should be minimal as compared to most other locations within the Wayzata Boulevard corridor, which is one of the reasons this site was proposed. The portion of the site proposed for construction staging is primarily over the landfill area that has been closed for a number of years, which is the area depicted in blue. Layers of clean fill over the landfill were added by the former owner in order to establish a suitable cap for the landfill and assure appropriate runoff characteristics. The current owners have had borings done in the landfill area in order to determine the stability and extent of the landfill as well as what materials might be encountered if a future phase of residential development is ever proposed. This information was obtained as part of the applicant's 2016. residential development proposal. The information regarding what is contained within the landfill was also contained within that application. The area that gained approval for residential development is not within the landfill area. Page 15 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 29 of 38] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. The proposed site use plan indicates the proposed rock construction entrance will be located where the approved future residential access would be located. This access point has been approved by Hennepin County as a temporary construction access. Gaffron stated he is not sure whether Hennepin County will require some sort of additional tum lanes, temporary or permanent., in the area, Since it is a county road, Hennepin County will need to make that determination. The Minnehaha. Creek Watershed District has approved an Erosion Control permit for the construction staging activity. The Long Lake Fire Chief has indicated no issues with use of the site for construction staging. The Orono Public Works Director has indicated this location is likely as good a location as the contractor will find for construction staging. The site plan suggests that temporary lighting will likely be used, and it is likely that to minimize impact on traffic flow, some work on the highway improvements will be at night. It would be appropriate to establish that any temporary lighting be downcast and directed away from residential areas. The site plan indicates a proposed visual and noise screening berm along the west and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is working with the NOCA to establish parameters and obtain permits for this berm which will become an amenity for future residential development. The City will require a grading plan be approved for this and it potentially will require a Conditional Use Permit based on the volume of permanent fill material. The applicant's narrative suggests that this site might be used as a recycling yard for projects other than just the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. This could put a different slant on how the site is intended to be used. The applicants should describe what is actually intended and how the contractor or Hennepin County expects to operate this site. Questions to be answered include whether materials from the Wayzata Boulevard project will be recycled and head out to other projects not in Orono and whether it is the City's expectation that this site is intended to be in use exclusively for the Wayzata Boulevard project and not as a regional recycling yard for other projects. Staff recommends that this industrial -level use at this site not become a regional Page 16 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C MINUTES OF TBE [Page 30 of 38] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. activity and that a definite end date be established commensurate with the end of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. The Planning Commission should consider the following: Are there any specific concerns with the location of this site for the proposed use? 2. Are there any specific concerns with the level or type of activity that is likely to be associated with the proposed use? Is the use intended to be specific to the Wayzata Boulevard improvements or is it intended for other projects? Are there any specific concerns with regard to the duration of the proposed use; i.e., is the date of completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements a suitable termination date for the activity or should it be further limited, such as requiring an annual review and/or annual approval of an extension? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? If the Planning Commission concludes that this site is appropriate for the proposed use, Staff would recommend that an Interim Use Permit be issued subject to at least the following conditions: 2. 3. 4. Establish an end date of the use to be no later than completion of the Wayzata Boulevard improvements. Use of the site is intended solely for activities related to the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project and may not be used to support other projects. Use of the site shall be subject to Orono Code standards with regard to noise, lighting, dust control, street maintenance, etc. Appropriate permits to be obtained from Hennepin County. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and any other agencies or governing authorities as may be required for activities on the site. Page 17 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C MINUTES OF THE [Page 31 of 38] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 5. Construction of a proposed permanent screening berm along the south and southwesterly boundaries of the site will require conditional use permit application and approval. 6. An annual review of the interim use permit shall be conducted to determine whether the use remains acceptable during the duration of the Wayzata Boulevard improvement project. Landgraver asked if Hennepin County has a site that they used during the project on Highway 12 on the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road. Gaffron indicated they vacated that property a number of years ago and Staff is not sure what the final intent for the property is. Curt Fretham, Lakewest Development, stated the entire site consists of approximately 30 acres and that they will only be using a small portion of the site for this activity. Approximately half of the site is wetlands and the other half is dry buildable land. Fretharn noted the green pasture area would be the location of the majority of the activities. The area highlighted in blue depicts the lot. Fretharn indicated the next slide illustrates the layout of how they envision things would work on the site. Access would be on the left side of the property. The trucks would come in and dump on the left-hand side. The material would then be processed in the blue highlighted area. Fretharn commented it seems like there will be a lot going on but there is not that much to it. Fretharn stated they have done similar activities on other sites previously. In addition, a screening buffer would be created. Fretharn stated there will be a lot of excess clean fill available from the job and that he was planning on using it to create a future buffering amenity but that it could be created now. A formal landscape plan does not exist currently but some trees could be planted along the berm to help further screen the site. Fretharn stated he has done some of this before in other communities a lot closer to town. Fretharn indicated they did a large demolition of a church in St. Louis Park where they crushed the materials, recycled them, and then used some of the materials on site but then hauled some off site. Another project Page 18 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 32 of 38] MENUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING C01NBUSSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. was done recently in Golden Valley behind Menard's where a large commercial building was demolished in addition to a project in Minnetonka at Highway 101 and Minnetonka Boulevard. Fretham stated he understands people have legitimate concerns about truck activity and the amount of dust that could be generated, but new technology has been invented and the materials are now dampened with water, which reduces the amount of dust that is created. Fretharn stated the equipment will make some noise but noted that the site is right next to the freeway and that he cannot imagine that anyone will know they are there. Fretham indicated the crushing will not occur at night. Fretham stated some of the challenge here is tying the property up for a period of time and then being able to balance it with the practicality of tying it up. Fretham stated one of the questions that he has to answer prior to committing to this is whether there will be enough materials coming off the Wayzata Boulevard job to make it worthwhile. Fretharn stated he does have some experience with this type of work and that it really is a blend of being able to mix all of those components, being able to work with Hennepin County, and being able to supplement it to make it a legitimate short-term operation. Fretharn stated he would like to point out that there is an indication they might need a separate conditional use permit for the berm and that he would like to process everything concurrently. Lemke asked what the hours of operation would be. Fretharn indicated they would like to work with the road construction project, which will occur mainly during the day, but that there might be times where the road crews will work longer days. Thiesse stated they do not necessarily be tied to Hennepin County's schedule and that they could limit their work to the daytime. Fretharn stated the crushing would not occur at night but the movement of trucks might occur during the night. Fretham stated it is likely Hennepin County will store some pipe and other materials to be used on the road project that might have to be loaded at night. Page 219 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C AUNTJTES OF THE [Page 33 of 38] ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated one of his concerns is possible headlights from a pay loader that are bouncing around and moving around since they can be a big distraction. Fretharn stated he does not envision that being a problem but that he included everything in the application that could possibly raise a concern. Fretham stated in his view there will be very little evening or nighttime activity but that it would be nice to be able to do that occasionally. Thiesse asked if recycling of offsite materials was done on his other sites. Fretham indicated there was. Frethain stated as it relates to traffic, there would not be a parade of trucks running through downtown Long Lake and that there will be occasional trucks coming off the bypass. Fretham. noted this site offers easy access versus coming in through downtown. Landgraver asked what type of other material they are contemplating bringing it. Fretharn indicated it would be concrete and asphalt. Lemke asked how many trips a day in and out are anticipated. Fretham stated he would estimate approximately 2,000 loads over the course of a year, which would amount to seven loads a day. Fretham noted those loads will not occur over the course of a year but will be in spurts. Fretham stated some days there will be 50 to 100 loads and some days nothing. Gaffron asked to what extent the contractor for the county project will be involved in the operation of the site on a daily basis and to what extent the County will be involved in the site on a daily basis. Fretharn indicated the County will not play a role in managing it and that Hennepin County would expect them to abide by the permit conditions. Fretharn stated their expectation is that the contractor will manage the site on a daily basis and they will be monitoring their activities. Landgraver asked if they are looking at a three-year project, Page 20 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 34 of 38] MESUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION AMETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Fretham stated they hope it is a three-year project, but that if it does not work after a year, they will probably shut it down. Fretham stated he would like to try it for at least a year. Lemke asked what will happen with the site after the process is done. Fretham indicated they would need to restore the site to a similar condition as before. Lemke asked whether a deal breaker would be if there is a restriction on bringing in other materials from other sites. Fretham stated it could be since at this time he has not gotten a commitment from the contractor on how much material will be brought in. Fretham stated to his understanding the contractor is negotiating with the County to do some of it onsite at the road project. If that happens, that will reduce the amount of material being brought to the site. Fretharn noted he has to look at the costs of tying up the property for a period of time versus the amount of materials to be brought in. Lemke asked him to address the question of pollution. Fretham indicated the contractor will be bringing in street materials, such as curb, concrete, asphalt, manholes and pipe. Fretham stated the material is fairly clean from a pollution standpoint, and if they were demoing a building, that would be a different process. Landgraver noted people are concerned about the old dump. Landgraver asked what government agency would look into the added weight and traffic to the site. Gaffron asked N1r. Fretharn what discussions he has had with the NEPCA regarding the site. Gaff'ron stated his understanding of what the gentleman questioning pollution was referring to is what happens if the landfill material is pushed further out or changes the drainage characteristics of the area. Gaffron stated there are a lot of things that go into a landfill and that he would like to know what the NUCA's views are on the proposed use for the site. Fretham. indicated they have spoken with the NIPCA but that they have not really spoken with them about the recycling activities. Fretham noted he has dealt with them before on other sites and that he Page 21 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C MINUTES OF THE [Page 35 of 38] ORONO PLANNING CONDUSSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. understands their process and concerns. Fretharn stated the MPCA's concern was more about the screening buffer since that is a permanent thing and that they will want to sign off on that. Fretharn indicated he has hired Wenck Engineering for that component and that he can add that point to his discussions with them going into the future. Gaffron asked if the WCA has a concern about the additional weight on the edges or the drainage being impacted. Fretharn stated their concern is adding a berm on top of the landfill area, which may make it more difficult to clean the landfill up if that is found to be necessary. Leskinen asked whether the applicant would restrict the materials to just road debris or whether there would be materials from the demolition of a building if they were to be allowed to have other sites bring in their debris. Fretharn stated they would like to have discretion to bring in other materials. Fretham noted on a demolition project they still have protocol they have to follow to make sure the materials that are going to be recycled are clean. Fretham stated he could provide that paperwork and that he will retain it in the event there is ever an audit performed. Leskinen asked if it would be fair to say that it could be more than just road debris. Fretharn stated potentially it could be. Schoenzeit asked if he would agree to the stipulation that if other materials are brought in that it be limited to concrete, asphalt, manholes, and not this other demolition material. Schoerizeit indicated he would be very uninterested in recycling non -road material and non -authenticated stuff and taming this site back into a dump. Fretham stated they do not want to turn it back into a dump and that they consider it to be a valuable property. Fretham stated if that was a stipulation, he would need to figure out whether they could live with that. Page 22 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 3 6 of 3 8] MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COI�BHSSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated it sounds like a site is necessary for recycling of road materials in Orono but that there is not a big need to be recycling other debris. Thiesse stated in his view the Planning Commission does not have enough information on whether that is a required component for the applicant. Thiesse commented he would love to see Orono take care of its own materials. Fretham noted he does not have control of the entire equation. Thiesse asked when that information would be available. Fretham stated it would probably be available in the next 3 0 to 90 days. Thiesse commented this site is probably the best site to do it, but in order to give exact information to the public on the interim use, he would like more information on how the property will be used and whether it could be viable without bringing in other materials from other towns. Schoenzeit stated the City's obligation is to keep this site clean and that it starts with knowing what the materials are and where they are coming from. Thiesse stated it also has to be a viable operation. Landgraver stated if there are limits on the amount of traffic and the type and amount of material, he would not be incaed to be as restrictive on where it is coming from. Frethain stated if the City of Mound has a road project going on and they would like to bring in 20 loads of street materials, he is hearing that might be acceptable, but if a building is being torn down in downtown Long Lake, they would like to see that go somewhere else. Schoenzeit stated he could take the concrete foundation but not the rest. Fretham stated that would be helpfiil since oftentimes that it what is recycled. Fretharn noted there are strict specifications that they use for the recycled materials and that the finished product has to be acceptable to their standards. Page 23 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 3 7 of 3 8] MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COADUSSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen asked if MN/DOT ran a similar type operation for the new Highway 12 project. Gaffron indicated it was a staging area for materials and equipment but to his knowledge they did not have a recycling operation. Gaffron stated vehicles were parked there now and then and there was a construction office located there. Gaff-ron stated that site was handled by NW/DOT and the City had limited say in it. Gaff:ron indicated he does not recall any conditional use permits being requested. Lemke asked if there would be storage of trucks and equipment as well as the crushing equipment. Fretharn indicated there would be. Fretham stated it is likely the crushing machine will be run less than 200 hours, which is basically two and a half weeks out of a year. Fretharn stated the machine might run for a few days and then not for a while and that they will not be running a full-blown crushing operation all summer long. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Allan Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road, stated it sounds like there will be a recycling operation on the site and that the City does not need someone hauling stuff from Brooklyn Park or Wayzata in there. Engleman questioned what will happen when they are done and the pile is still standing there. Engleman commented it looks to him to be a business and that the City does not need that here. Engleman stated he does not know if the borings showed any contaminated material from the bypass project. Gaffron stated the boring logs primarily identified materials within the landfill and they attempted to determine the boundary between the landfill and high land. Gaff-ron stated he has not seen borings from in town but that any contaminated material would need to be hauled to different sites. Thiesse stated he did see the soil borings from downtown out to Birch's and they were all good. Engleman commented it looks to him like there will be a business operation over there and that they will be taking in other cities' material from all over. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Page 24 of 64 Item #14 - CC Agenda - 0510812017 File #17-3910 Exhibit C [Page 38 of 38] MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. (The Planning Commission suspended discussion on this item in order to discuss Item No. 5) Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to table Application No. 17-3910, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Interim Use Permit, and to continue the public hearing to the April 17 Planning Commission meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 7. 17-3912 BRUCE BULKELAND, PIID 07-117-23-31-0028 (Adjacent to 1298 Wildhurst Trail), VARIANCES, 8:02 PAL — 8:38 P.M. Bruce Birkeland, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a variance to facilitate an administrative lot line adjustment, which is a subdivision exemption, in order to create an additional one lakeshore lot where there is currently one lakeshore lot and one non-lakeshore lot. The southern lot is not a lakeshore lot currently. The applicant owns both lots and has presented two options: Create two conforming lots, each meeting the minimum area and width at the 75 -foot setback. This would require a side setback variance allowing the existing home on Lot 2 to be located within three feet of the new dividing line. The side setback variance is needed in order to certify the subdivision exemption. 2. Locate the dividing line so that the existing home meets the required I 0 -foot side setback. However, this results in Lot 3 having 132 feet in width where , 40 feet is required. A lot width variance would be required in order to process the subdivision exemption. Curtis noted Option 2 is the applicant's preferred option. The LR- 1 B requires 140 feet in width at the ordinary high water level and at the 75 -foot setback for Lake Minnetonka. There should be at least 280 feet at these points for supporting two lakeshore lots. The plans submitted for either option do not appear to reflect conforming measurement of lot widths. The Page 25 of 64 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 16 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description: #17-3929 Todd Irvine o/b/o Antoinette Beenders, 1669 North Farin Road — Variances (Average setback, bluff impacts) & Conditional Use Permit (Grading) - Resolution Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to adopt a resolution granting variance and CUP approval for proposed pool, deck & retaining wall replacement. 2. Application Deadline. Revd: 3/22/17 Complete: 3/22/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 5/21/17 Review period extended on 5/16/17 to: 6/20/17 3. Background. The applicant is requesting approval for replacement and/or reconstruction of the existing deck and pool, as well as removal and replacement of existing retaining walls on the lake side of the existing residence. A CUP is required for grading work as well as variances for average lakeshore setback encroachment and bluff encroachment. Please review the attached Planning Commission memo and exhibits. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed this application and held a public hearing at its April 17th meeting, and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the variances as requested, subject to the following conditions: - City Engineer to review grading plan and temporary access to Long Lake Boulevard - Applicant to provide a vegetation management plan and landscape plan prior to Council review - Applicant to propose storinwater management facilities (rain garden?) to reduce runoff impacts from site (not required to mitigate for neighborhood runoff) 5. Public Comments. No public comments were forthcoming at the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. A letter from Long Lake area resident Christopher Jones requesting use of stortnwater management practices was received the day of the Planning Commission meeting and provided to the PC members at the meeting (Exhibit F). 6. City Engineer Comments. City consulting engineer Bob Bean has submitted comments and recommended approval conditions, attached as Exhibit C dated May 1, 2017. He also noted at a meeting between staff and the applicant on May 16 that due to the reduction in hardcover there is no specific need for additional stormwater management facilities. The City will in its storinwater project prioritization list in the pending Surface Water Management Plan update, be including armoring (rip -rapping) the upper end of the drainageway near the cul-de-sac to reduce erosion in that area. Pursuant to staff s recent meeting with the applicant, updated plans reflecting staff recommendations have been submitted — see Exhibit B. 7. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution, which incorporates a number of conditions to be met prior to issuance of construction permits. Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Mike Gaffron Approved By: D5R AGENDAITEM 17-3929 1669 North Farm Road May 22,2017 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the attached resolution entitled A Resolution Approving Variances ftom Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-12 79 and a Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-966 through 78-968 - File No. 17-3929. Exhibits A — Resolution B — Updated Grading & Construction Plans 5/17/17 C — City Engineer Comments dated 5/1/17 D — Notice of PC Action dated 4/25/17 E — Draft PC Minutes of 4/17/17 F — Comment Letter received 4/17/17 G — Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 417/17 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Mike Gaffron Approved By: D5R S F1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-966 THROUGH 78-968 FILE NO. 17-3929 WHEREAS, Antoinette Beenders (hereinafter the "Applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1669 North Farm Road within the City of Orono and legally described as: Lot 7, Block 1, The Farm At Long Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on March 22, 2017, the Applicant made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 and a conditional use permit pursuant to Sections 78-966 through 78-968 to allow site grading as well as construction and reconstruction of decks, pool, and retaining walls located in a bluff impact zone where no structures or grading are normally allowed and constituting an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback where no such encroachment is normally allowed; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances and conditional use permit as requested; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances and conditional use permit as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3929. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. A2. The Property is located in the LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A3. The Property contains 3.1 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 205 feet at the lakeshore and 275 feet at the 75 -foot setback line. A4. The Property is within Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier 1 and hardcover on the property is limited to 25%. A5. The Applicant requests variance and CUP approval in order to replace existing decks, retaining walls and swimming pool, all located on the lake side of the existing residence. The project also involves regrading of the south and west yards adjacent to the pool area and eliminating a multi -tiered retaining wall system in favor of a single tier system. The property is a fairly steep lakeshore lot on North Farm Road, and the existing home was constructed in 1981. While the house and pool/decks/walls are tucked into the top of a slope that today is defined as a bluff, they were all constructed prior to City ordinances that would have required variances for such construction. A6. All of the proposed work is more than 100 feet from the lakeshore and appears to be at least 75 feet from the nearest wetlands. A wetland delineation has been performed to confirm no wetland setback issues. A7. In addition to structure and grading within a bluff feature, the westerly half of the proposed reconstruction is located lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. The westerly deck (a second story deck) will encroach slightly further lakeward than the existing deck and patio, while in the pool area the encroachment will be approximately the same or slightly less. The house to the east on Long Lake Boulevard will be completely unaffected by the encroachment. The house to the west sits much further back from the lake. The very minor additional encroachment of the expanded patio and deck will be lower in the topography, and is not anticipated to reduce lake views enjoyed by the neighbor. A8. The proposed grading within the lakeshore yard is necessary in order to match the new grades resulting from removal of the tiered retaining walls. Proposed grading plans indicate that approximately V-1.5' of fill will be added in an area approximately 40' x 90', totaling in the neighborhood of 500-600 cubic yards. Existing slope in this area is in the 30-35% range, while the proposed slope is in the 35-40% range. The proposed slope will be more uniform, smoothing out some of the minor variations of the existing slope. It appears there will be a few trees removed as part of this grading plan. A9. Along the easterly yard, the tiered retaining wall system will be removed in favor of a single wall system. In this area existing slopes range from 18% to 36%, and at the base of the slope is a drainageway within an existing drainage easement. Proposed re- grading after the tiered wall is removed will result in a uniform slope of about 34-36% or between 2.5:1 and 3:1. Grading plans indicate that the drainageway will not be filled or graded; however, a temporary culvert in the drainageway is proposed, to allow CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. construction vehicle access from Long Lake Boulevard. Total fill in this area is estimated at another 500 cubic yards, and will range up to approximately 2'deep where it replaces the retaining walls. Al 0. The proposed slopes at 2.5:1 or 3:1 are at the limit of what is maintainable as yard area. Applicant has indicated that permanent ground cover in these sloped areas will be a low - growth fescue which is anticipated to provide good soil stability. While grading and filling in a bluff area is generally prohibited, the proposed replacement of the existing structures substantially in kind with only minor revisions to allow for greater safety would appear to be reasonable and have no additional impacts on the bluff if appropriate erosion control and permanent vegetation measures are implemented. Al 1. Construction of the proposed retaining walls in excess of 4 feet in height will require engineering. A stairway adjacent to the easterly pool wall is propose, to replace the existing freestanding step system located further east of the existing retaining walls and the existing stair system extending from the westerly decks. Al 2. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: B1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Single family residences are a permitted use within the LR -1A zoning district. B2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The residential principal structure and associated amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. B3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the configuration and location of the existing amenities is such that their reconstruction and replacement do not meet the standards of the Zoning Code. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The extremely lengthy lake setback of the adjacent home to the immediate west establishes a setback line that makes the existing and proposed amenities nonconforming; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Because the proposed encroachments of the average setback line are essentially S F1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. replacing existing very similar encroachments, no impact to the character of the neighborhood will result. B4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The average setback encroachments are a factor unique to this property because of the unusually large lake setback of the neighboring property to the west. B5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to an other property in the neighborhood, however, the conditions which require the variance are unique to his property. B6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has a right to maintain the existing amenities involved, but they have deteriorated to a point where they need to be replaced. Proposed replacement will actually result in condensing the footprint of the encroachments. B7. The granting of the proposed variances will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. B8. The granting of such variances will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting of the average setback variance will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the property owner to replace existing deteriorated amenities with new very similar amenities making for a safer situation. B9. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The Applicant has not requested consideration based on economic reasons. B1 0. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This criterion is not applicable. B1 1. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This criterion is not applicable. B1 2. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This criterion is not applicable. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the City Council finds that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: S F1 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C1. The proposed use is consistent with the Community Management Plan (CMP). The proposed use is accessory residential in nature and such use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this residential neighborhood. C2. The proposed use is compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by Article V, Division 3 of the City Code. Construction of retaining walls and site regrading to the extent proposed requires a conditional use permit per Article V, Division 3, hence this application. C3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. The proposed use will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. C4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system. This criteria is not applicable to this situation. C5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost. This criterion is met C6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future. The retaining walls and grading as proposed are expected to have no detrimental effects on adjoining or nearby properties, and are compatible in visual and functional aspects with the surrounding properties. C7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The proposed walls and grading are residential in nature and are consistent with similar features in the surrounding lakeshore neighborhood. C8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The walls and grading are residential in nature and will be consistent with similar features in the surrounding lakeshore neighborhood. C9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The proposed walls and grading are expected to have no detrimental impacts to the neighborhood and are not expected to affect property values. C1 0. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses. The location, orientation and design of the walls and grading plan are such that no screening or buffering will be required. The Applicant proposes to plant additional trees lakeward of the construction which will soften the visual impact of the improvements as viewed from the lake. C1 1. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means. The walls and grading plan are not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. The construction process will be subject to City requirements for keeping roads free from dirt, mud and debris. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C1 2. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. Other than temporary construction traffic on Long Lake Boulevard, the proposed use will not generate any of these undesirable impacts. C13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The residential character of the walls and grading would appear to blend well with the neighborhood, and is expected to have no detrimental environmental impacts. C14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. This criterion is not applicable to this situation. C15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The walls and grading plan are not expected to have any impact on the health, safety and welfare of the public. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 and a conditional use permit pursuant to Sections 78-966 through 78-968 to allow site grading as well as construction and reconstruction of decks, pool, and retaining walls located in a bluff impact zone where no structures or grading are normally allowed and constituting an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback where no such encroachment is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Council approval is based on the survey by Mark C. Kemper of Kemper & Associates, Inc., dated March 22, 2017; and grading, construction and landscape plans identified as Sheets L-1 thru L-5 by Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. dated 5/17/17, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit and commencement of construction, applicant and applicant's contractor shall meet on the site with the City Engineer for a pre -construction meeting to review the proposed construction access to Long Lake Boulevard and the drainageway crossing. No impacts to the drainageway will be allowed. Applicant shall adhere to the recommendations in Consulting Engineer Robert Bean's letter dated May 1, 2017. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit, applicant shall have depicted on the survey the wetland boundary and actual setback dimensions. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, applicant shall provide detailed plans for the proposed pool/deck drainage system outlet for City Engineer approval. 5. Applicant shall adhere to the proposed landscape/vegetation management plan attached as Exhibit B (Sheets L-2 and L-3), including tree replacement and ground cover establishment. 6. Applicant shall conform to all MCWD erosion control requirements. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of Council approval, or the approvals will expire on that date (May 22, 2018). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of May, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor N—OUND P" ­ le INI " TWEEN TREE PROTECTION NOTES, --,-I 1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LOCATION5 5HOUN ON THI5 PLAN. - --cs 2. TREE PROTECTION FENCING WILL BE MINIMIUM 4' H IGH ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFTEr' rENCIN6�,,4 ORANGE SILT FENCE. 3. FENCING 5HALL BE 5ECURELY ANCHORED BY 5TEEL FENCE POSTS INSTALLED 0' ON CENTER 4. TREE PROTECTION FENCING MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR T�" AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL COMFLE.TION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL LANID5CAPING 15 IN5T,46LEI-). 0. V 20' Q, . . now Scale 1"=20'-O" North Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 1511:NH -tankstillyd. Minuet. Is., su"c"d. 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Fstesirnile 952 475 1667 DESIGN - BUILD Landscape Architecture (s) o se. wence(so— I use, LONG LA4[fE 0 ons�... 'seol, .. cezr.'— Ing Los�sr REcmDm s". (.Asl� �14 (o,2,,ee� Al s') PF NAT�AL u&"NMN s"- 0. V 20' Q, . . now Scale 1"=20'-O" North Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 1511:NH -tankstillyd. Minuet. Is., su"c"d. 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Fstesirnile 952 475 1667 DESIGN - BUILD Landscape Architecture I hereby certify th,t this plus, speeiflemims, or report o.s prepmed by me or under my direct -pr-isi.. end th.t I not . duty Registered Ltook-in, Architect end,, the 1— of the Smt, of Minuesous. Todd Irvine reg. no. 46008 date: 00/00/00 dr syn: date: 2017-4-11 revisions: 2017-5-17 EROSION CONTROL PLAN L-1 C 0 Ing I hereby certify th,t this plus, speeiflemims, or report o.s prepmed by me or under my direct -pr-isi.. end th.t I not . duty Registered Ltook-in, Architect end,, the 1— of the Smt, of Minuesous. Todd Irvine reg. no. 46008 date: 00/00/00 dr syn: date: 2017-4-11 revisions: 2017-5-17 EROSION CONTROL PLAN L-1 KEENAN I P, t 14 Ir kl�A SVEIVEN KEENAN I P, t 14 Ir kl�A SVEIVEN Ixe I/4X4 PLATE TO A PIE TOP RAIL aX3 CORNER POS II INTERMEDIATE A' STAINLESS STEE CABLE IX2 BOTTOM RAIL I)EC< FRAIL 1 /2-=P-0` 1/4X4 LATE TO ATTACH WOODEN TOP RAIL 3X3 CORNER POSTS STAINLESS CABLE IX2 BOTTOM RAIL SXE EASE PLATE TO ATTACH TO DECK TRE ATIED TRIPLE 2X12 RIM JOIST Sx ROUn" SAWN CEDAR POST POST ANCHOR BRACKET WITH IX6 TRIM 10' DIAMETER CONCRETE FOOTING 46 INCHES DEEP Xe, IFE TOP RAIL 1>13[ INTERME DATE RA L P06T 1/4XI INTERMEDIATE CABLE SUPPORT P05T NOTCHED N70 FRAMING OR TIED UJ17H METAL BRA . C<rTS DEC< 5ECTION 4 IX6 CCMPC51TE DECKI NG WITH HIDDEN AN HORS TREATED 2XI2 JOISTS WITH HANGERS CUT E�ISTING BRICK AND POCKET BEA" AND LGIR. BEAM TO EXI STING R`� PATCH BRICK AN ILA511 AND CAULK �5 REOUIREn (6 �-OCATIONS) TR ATED DOUBLE 2XIO BEAM AT HOUSE DEC< ELE\44-1-10N 4 0) \N L&1-�Ou5f:: (.n 21. E 97,, Itt RAIL P05TCD �,- I M Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 1511Z -tattkaBlvd. Minuet. I Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 475 1667 DESIGN , BUILD Landscape Architecture E �aaaal 9z Ing :"HOU5E C6 TREATED DOUBLE 2X12 21.22 �6 2 - '11 1 U11,11rilt 1 1 -7)F--C,< FfP,,4r-11NG ELAN .97, LD I herth, terrify that this plan, sp�dfir.thm, ., report o.s prepared by me or under my M direct -pe-isim, ad that I duty Regut—d L..d,e.pc Arthitect and,, the 1— of the Star, 0"Minu o"'. 0 Todd Irvine :12 JOISTS WITH 0 reg. no. 46008 SAWN CEDAR 0 date: 00/00/00 ING -D ry 0 bo LL dr wn: -xxx-- date: 2017-2-20 0 revisions: 2017-5-17 ry :3 DECK Lu DETAILS ry In MEMO L-4 CA WOOD LANDI DEC< F=L,4N 0 -,-C-6.21 U E �aaaal 9z Ing :"HOU5E C6 TREATED DOUBLE 2X12 21.22 �6 2 - '11 1 U11,11rilt 1 1 -7)F--C,< FfP,,4r-11NG ELAN .97, LD I herth, terrify that this plan, sp�dfir.thm, ., report o.s prepared by me or under my M direct -pe-isim, ad that I duty Regut—d L..d,e.pc Arthitect and,, the 1— of the Star, 0"Minu o"'. 0 Todd Irvine :12 JOISTS WITH 0 reg. no. 46008 SAWN CEDAR 0 date: 00/00/00 ING -D ry 0 bo LL dr wn: -xxx-- date: 2017-2-20 0 revisions: 2017-5-17 ry :3 DECK Lu DETAILS ry In MEMO L-4 50�TH ELEVATION HOUSF UPRIGHT EVERGREEN �T rAR EDGE C� FOOL DEC< �NE57 ELEVA710N EASI ELEVA710N 21 4 - Scale 118" = V-0" Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 AM—t..k. Blvd. Affinndonka,AM—sota 55345 Tdeph— 952 475 1229 F—unfle 9i2 475 1667 DESIGN - BUILD Landscape Archituture I h—by �fify th.t ffii� pl� �P�i&.d­ r�prt — , -M b, . —d- �.y ffi— -p—W. d fl�t I d.1, RW—M L..d—� A,dm— ,&, th, 1— f th, st- f Nfi�—. Todd Irvine date: 00/00/00 dr— date: 2017-1-26 r-ki.n-20I7-2-20-- 2017-3-22 Landscape Elevations D-1 9z I h—by �fify th.t ffii� pl� �P�i&.d­ r�prt — , -M b, . —d- �.y ffi— -p—W. d fl�t I d.1, RW—M L..d—� A,dm— ,&, th, 1— f th, st- f Nfi�—. Todd Irvine date: 00/00/00 dr— date: 2017-1-26 r-ki.n-20I7-2-20-- 2017-3-22 Landscape Elevations D-1 BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. May 1, 2017 Mike Gaffron Senior Planner City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 2636 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bol�cln-'Vienk.com Council Exhibit C RE: 17-3929: 1669 North Farm Road Average setback and bluff impact variances & grading CUP Dear Mr. Gaff ron, We have completed review of the information provided to us on April 25, 2017 for the average setback and bluff impact variances and grading CUP for 1669 North Farm Road. Following are our comments for City consideration: I. An Erosion Control Plan should be submitted for review to ensure adequate erosion and sediment control will be provided. Perimeter erosion control measures should be installed by the Contractor prior to any other work, including demolition of existing items, and inspected by the City to verify extent and adequacy. Contractor must provide a minimum 24 notice prior to inspection. 2. A Landscape/Vegetation Management Plan should be submitted for review to ensure adequate restoration is provided for disturbed areas. Plan should indicate the installation of erosion control blanket on all slopes 3:1 or greater. Steep slopes should be stabilized immediately after grading is complete. 3. Native vegetation should be considered for the areas of steep slopes. Native vegetation would provide a deeper root structure than turf grasses, thus providing for a more stable slope. 4. Retaining walls 4' or greater in height must be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer, Tiered walls must be spaced more than double the height of the lower wall apart, or they shall be considered one wall. Wall plans should be submitted for review and approval prior to any land disturbing activities. 5. Roof drains and drain tile should be installed with improvements to outlet runoff from roof and pool deck directly to drainage way, instead of draining over the slope, to minimize erosion potential. 6. The following should be considered reRard!nR access to the site from Lone Lake Boulevard: a. The location of the construction access path should be confirmed with the City Engineer. The access should be routed so no trees over 6" are removed. b. Long Lake Boulevard should be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work, and the existing condition should be documented with pictures. After completion of work, the street should be reviewed for damage, and the Contractor should be required to repair any damage deemed to be caused by site work. H:\ORNO\CI3113299\17-3929 - 1669 North Farm Road\1669 North Farm Road_EngRevI.docx 3ottan & Monk is an 1669 North Farm Road May 1, 2017 Page 2 c. The adjacent drainage way should be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work, and the existing condition should be documented with pictures. After completion of site work, the construction access path should be completely removed, and any sediment introduced re -dressed on side slopes. The drainage way should be restored to match pre -construction conditions. d. A rock construction entrance should be installed to minimize tracking onto Long Lake Boulevard. e. Inlet protection should be installed on the catchbasin on Long Lake Boulevard immediately downstream of the entrance. f. A temporary culvert with minimum 15" diameter should be installed in the drainage way under the temporary access to allow for continuous drainage while minimizing potential for blockage. g. The Landscape Plan should include restoration for construction access path after site work is completed. h. The contractor must not block traffic on Long Lake Boulevard. Traffic control must be provided during mobilization accordingly, and construction vehicles should be parked so as to provide clear driving lanes. 7. Grading is proposed in too close of proximity to existing trees on the south side of the construction limits. Grading should be revised to tie into existing grade further from the base of trees, or the trees should be indicated as being removed. If grades are adjusted, taller walls may be necessary, or another wall may be required. 8. The applicant will be required to obtain a permit from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their Erosion Control rule. A copy of the approved permit should be provided to the City prior to any land disturbing activities. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean, Jr, P.E. Water Resources Engineer H:\ORNO\CI3113299\17-3929. 1669 North Fam Roact\1669 North Farm Raad_EngRev1.docx Wton & Menk is an NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Council Exhibit D CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway ZONING FILE: 17-3929 PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 DATEOFNOTICE: Apr1125,2017 TO: Antoinette Beenders COPIES: Todd Irvine 1669 North Farm Road Keenan & Svelven, Inc. Long Lake, MN 55356 11519 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 TYPE OF REQUEST: Average setback and bluff 'impact variances & grading CUP DATE OF MEETING: April 17, 2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to recommend approval of the requested variances and CUP, subject to: City Engineer to review grading plan and temporary access to Long Lake Boulevard Applicant to provide a vegetation management plan and landscape plan prior to Council review Applicant to propose stormwater management facilities (rain garden?) to reduce runoff impacts from site (not required to mitigate for neighborhood runoff) VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, May 8, 2017 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM Note: Still planning to meet with you on Wednesday, April 26 at 9:00 a.m. at City Offices If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at rn-qaffronC&ci.orono.mn.u--,, or 952.249.4622. MIN`UTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 7. The contractor shall post a contact number and able to respond to complaints in a timely fashion. The Planning Commission had o questions for Staff. Michael Hart, Applicant� stated S j has done a great job describing the project/that he can answer any questions the Planning Commissi may have. Thiesse asked if there is room for drainageTn the side to keep the runo6 off the neighbor's property. Hart indicated there is. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9: 11 There were no public comments regarding this Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:1 Landgraver commented this is a well r oned re -use of the prop that he appreciates Staff s rs. recommendation regarding coti Ir Schwingler moved, XLanraver seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3928, as Michael Hart, 2510 asco Point Road, granting of a conditional use pern it, subject to the conditions ��ed in Staff s report. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 8. #17-3929 KEENAN & SVE11VEN ON BEHAILF OF ANTIONETTE BEENDERS, 1669 NORTH FARM ROAD, VARIANCE, 9:13 P.M. — 9:38 P.M. Todd Irvine with Keenan & Sveiven, was present. Gaff-ron stated the applicant is requesting approval for replacement and/or reconstruction of the existing decks and pool as well as replacement of the existing retaining wall system on the lake side of the existing Page 38 of 72 Council Exhibit E MENUTES OF THE ORONO PLANT-NaNG COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. residence. A conditional use permit is required for grading work as well as variances for average lakeshore setback encroachment and bluff encroachment. There is an existing pool with an extensive retaining wall system supporting it as well as some decks along the lake side of the house. The proposed work involves replacing the pool, the decks, and adding a second story deck at the southwest comer of the house. The property is a fairly steep lakeshore lot. The house and pool, decks, and walls are tucked into the top of a slope that today is defined as a bluff. In 198 1, when the house was built, the City did not have a bluff ordinance. The house was built in a location where today it would not be allowed to be constructed. All of the proposed work is more than 100 feet from the lakeshore and appears to be at least 75 feet from the nearest wetland. Gaffron stated the applicants will be conducting a delineation this spring to determine the exact boundary location of the wetlands. The first issue is the average setback. In addition to the structure and grading within a bluff, the west half of the proposed reconstruction actually is encroaching the average setback line as defined by the lakeshore homes to the west and east. The westerly deck will encroach slightly further lakeward than the existing deck and patio. The patio area encroachment will be approximately the same or slightly less than the existing. From a view standpoint the neighboring properties should not be impacted by any of the proposed construction. The additional encroachment of the deck and pool will be lower than the neighboring house. It is unclear at this time whether that neighbor has any objections to the second story. It should be noted that there is an apparent view easement that was established as part of the original subdivision covenants at the comer of the proposed deck. That easement is not enforceable by the City. The proposed grading within the lakeshore yard would appear to be necessary in order to match the new grades resulting from removal o the tiered retaining walls. Proposed grading plans suggest that approximately I to 1.5 feet of fill will be added in an area approximately 40' x 90', totaling between 500- 600 cubic yards. The existing slope in this area is in the 30-35 percent range, while the proposed slope is in the 35-40 percent range. The proposed slope will be more uniform and will smooth out some of the minor variations of the existing slope. It appears that a few trees will be removed as part of the grading plan. Page 39 of 72 MWWTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMUSSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Along the easterly side yard, the tiered retaining wall system will be removed in favor of a single wall system. In this area existing slopes range from 18 percent to 36 percent. At the base of the slope is a drainageway within an existing drainage easement. Proposed re -grading after the tiered wall is removed will result in a uniform slope of about 34-36 percent. Grading plans indicate that the drainageway will not be filled or graded. A temporary culvert in the drainageway, however, is proposed to allow construction vehicle access from Long Lake Boulevard. Total fill in this area estimated by Staff is another 500 cubic yards and will range up to perhaps two feet in depth where it replaces the retaining walls. The proposed slope is at the limit of what is maintainable as yard area. The applicants should be asked what they intend for permanent ground cover in those sloped areas. Grading and filling in a bluff area is generally prohibited and the existing structures in this area would likely not be allowed under today's codes. However, their replacement substantially in kind, with only minor revisions to allow for greater safety, would appear to be reasonable and have no additional impacts on the bluff if appropriate erosion control and permanent vegetation measures are implemented. Before the Planning Commission tonight is a letter that was received from Christopher Jones. The letter talks about the fact that the applicants are seeking variances for average lakeshore setbacks, bluff setback variances, and a conditional use permit for grading. Jones states that "Tlie proximity of this property to Long Lake and the slope o the property towards Long Lake suggests that any variance approvals be paired with rain/storm water remediation best management practices." Jones ftuther states that "Long Lake is an impaired lake with phosphorus and other chemical levels that inhibit its ability to recover. Members of the Commission who grew up on Lake Minnetonka in the 1970s will recall what that body of water looked and felt like, and they will likely recall the 'Save The Lake' campaign that began that lake's recovery. That's where Long Lake is today, and that's without the invasive species that compound the problems. Any variances granted to this property/project also should seek commensurate rainwater runoff treatment using rainwater gardens or similar management practices to infiltrate runoff before it reaches the lakeshore. The pool deck is a hardscape surface that will shed its rainwater to the lake, and employing Page 40 of 72 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. remediation techniques uphill from the lakeshore towards the pool deck will keep excess contaminated water from a 100 -year rain event from the lake." Gaff-ron noted construction of the proposed retaining walls in excess of four feet in height will require engineering. A stairway adjacent to the easterly pool wall is proposed to replace the existing freestanding step system located further east of the existing retaining walls and the existing stair system extending from the westerly decks. The Planning Commission should review with the applicant what trees will be removed due to the grading plan and whether any additional screening is necessary. Also recommended to be reviewed with the applicant is the plan for temporary construction access from Long Lake Boulevard. In addition, the Planning Commission should discuss the following: Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner and that the criteria for issuance of variances and a conditional use permit are met? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances and conditional use permit, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose additional conditions in order to mitigate any impacts created by the granting of the requested variances and conditional use permit? Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance for encroachments of the average lakeshore setback as well as for structures and grading work within the bluff. The extent of the grading to be accomplished also meets the threshold for needing a conditional use permit and Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for the grading work, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Applicant to review temporary access from Long Lake Boulevard and the temporary culvert through the drainage easement with the City Engineer subject to his approval. No impacts to the drainageway will be allowed. Page 41 of 72 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MTETING Monday, Aptil 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. V4 2. Applicant to provide a vegetation management plan for review by Staff and Council in response to the grading plan that results in unusually steep slopes. Applicant to conform to all MCWD erosion control requirements. 4. Planning Commission to recommend whether any replacement screening will be required. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Todd Irvine, Landscape Architect with Keenan & Sveiven, indicated he would be able to answer any questions the Planning Commission might have. Thiesse asked what size block it planned to be used. Irvine indicated it would be small block. Thiesse asked about access to the site. Irvine indicated it is difficult to access the back area of the property due to the side slopes on the east side of the house. In the past there was access from Long Lake through the property when the storm drainage system was constructed. Irvine indicated there is an opening there currently that they would use to access the site without coming all the way down Long Lake Road. Thiesse asked if he is amenable to a stormwater drainage pond. Irvine stated they have not discussed that but noted they have reduced the actual structural footprint of the property. Irvine stated everything that is disturbed is proposed to be seeded with a low -grow fescue grass that will be mowed occasionally. An erosion control blanket will be placed down to prevent erosion until the seed is established. Thiesse asked if the contours on the left side will allow the trees to be saved. Page 42 of 72 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Irvine indicated they will be. Irvine noted there are a couple of trees on the survey that do not exist due to storm damage. In addition, two trees will be removed in the area of the work. Lemke stated his only concern relates to the slope. Lemke asked whether fescue will be enough to retain that slope. Irvine stated it will be and that it is a 2.5 to I slope, which is a mowable, maintainable slope. Irvine indicated the wall will be engineered. Thiesse stated his biggest concern is also the slope. Thiesse stated placing a foot of dirt on top of a bluff raises the chance for that slope to slide. Irvine indicated the fill will be compacted in lifts as it is brought in and shelfed. Irvine stated there is a 3 - tier retaining wall system that is deteriorating consisting of approximately 16 vertical feet of retai i g wall. With the slope revisions, the height of the retaining wall will be reduced to ten feet. In addition, the size of the pool and patio space will be reduced. Tbiesse asked whether the view easement is an issue. Gaffron stated the private covenant view easement is one the City cannot enforce. If the neighbors or association want to enforce it, that is their privilege. Gaff-ron stated the City has not heard from the neighbors on this project and that he is not sure whether they have any views of that area or whether they have any issues with the second story. Irvine indicated he did provide a plan and drafted a letter to both neighbors. The neighbor to the west has indicated he is supportive of the project. The other neighbor wrote a note on the letter that said they were in favor of the project as well. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9:29 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Page 43 of 72 M[INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMUMSSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:29 p.m. Schwingler stated he would agree with having some type of rain garden there to help mitigate the rtmoff into Long Lake. Thiesse asked whether there is any criteria for building on a bluff. Gaffron stated because the code typically prohibits construction in the bluff area, there really are no criteria to follow. Gaffron indicated he would want the engineers to take a look at this prior to it proceeding to the City Council but that in his view shelfing the fill makes a lot of sense. Gaffron stated the applicant will need to make sure the drainageway stays open and a location for some sort of stormwater management system should be considered for the lower end of the drainageway. Irvine indicated they have submitted a permit application for erosion control to the Watershed District. Thiesse asked whether the applicant has any plans for screening. Irvine indicated it would be grass coming all the way up and that they are not opposed to planting trees in that area to mitigate the loss of the two trees that will be removed. The landscape planting plan between the steps that come down on the right-hand side incorporates vines to help obscure the wall. Landgraver asked if any kind of stormwater management will be done further down the slope. Irvine stated the whole drainageway across this property drains this site as well as the road and that in his view it is not practical to place a rain garden in that area. Irvine stated there might be an option for some stormwater management in the area of the pool. Gaffron stated that is a good point and that it might not be appropriate to place the burden on this applicant to solve that problem since the hardcover is really not being changed. Irvine stated in his view the size of the rain garden that would be needed at the bottom would be rather large. Page 44 of 72 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, April 17,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffron indicated he will ask the City Engineer whether there is something that can be done to the situation. Lemke asked whether a more comprehensive landscape plan will be done prior to proceeding to the City Council. Irvine stated they can do that. Leskinen moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3929, Keenan & Sveiven on behalf of Antionette Beenders, 1669 North Farm Road, granting of a variance and conditional use permit based on Staff recommendations, with additional stormwater and landscaping information being provided prior to the application going before the City Council along with review of the City Engineer of the drainage plan. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 9. #17-3931 V ST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ON BEHALF 0 RICK AND PMJBARBARALUPI =INT, ID 0-117-23-42-0001/0002/003 (LOTS 1,2, 3 CASCO POINT ADDMON), SKETCH PLA ",-38 P.M. — 10:20 P.M. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development,Was present. Gaffron stated this is a sketch plan for a propo8 d 0-' subdivision of a vacant property located at the r 'w Zonsists of three existing tax parcels that the 0% north end of Ivy Place on Casco Point. The p pe applicants propose to reconfigure into two resid tial uildin, to s 1 lot size of the LR-lC District. /7 Gaffron displayed the 1955 plat of the operty. In'1955, the peninsula, and the center of the pen' sula. was wetland. lots, each exceeding the 1/2 -acre minimum ly edge of this area was a thin Gaff-ron displayed some aerial,&otographs from 1945 through 1975 depicting the property and surrounding area. Gaffron �(bted by 1960 the area had become filled in a lifflq bit more, and by 1970, it had been completely filled in. By 1971 some volunteer trees have started to gr* on the property. Gaffron stated this iso/piece of property that has been vacant but has gone through a number of changes. Page 45 of 72 From: christopherjones [mailto:im2onescw0Dgmail.comI Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 3:29 PM To: Denise Leskinen (deniseleskinen0gmail.com) <deniseleskinenPgmail.com>; Kevin Landgraver(klandgraver@gmall.com)<klandgraverggmail.com>;bruselemke@gmaii.com olsoncll6L@gmaii.com; Loren Schoenzeit (loren sLED 3d lake. co�) <lore.ns@3dlake.com>; Jon Schwingler (ion schwingOD aol.co m) <ionschwlnP,65Daol.com>; Christopher McGrann (c mcgrannPhotmall.com) <c mcgrann2hotmail.com> Council Cc: Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.US> Exhibit F Subject: Public Comments for Planning Commission Meeting 4-17-2017 To the Orono Planning Commission members, I am responding to the Notice of public hearing regarding several properties that directly affect the Long Lake and Lake Minnetonka watersheds, and therefore, the water quality of these watersheds. Specifically: 17-3918 seeks variances for lot area, lot width, lake setback, average lake setback, and a 0-75' hardcover variance. The details of this request is not included in the Public Notice so it is difficult to assess their individual impacts. Given the low elevation of this property in relation to Lake Minnetonka, and therefore its potential direct impact on the lake's water quality, any variance approvals also must seek to include stormwater runoff remediation through best management practices. This is particularly appropriate for the hardscape variance being sought. Again, because of the property's low elevations, infiltration of stormwater runoff will be difficult, and this fact challenges the approphateness of any hardscape variance request. Requiring the installation of numerous rainwater gardens using deep root plants is one solution that could mitigate the impact of any variances being sought; there are other best management practfices available, too. For example, for every sq/ft of variiance sought, an equal sq/ft of rainwater garden must be installed. Without this type of tradeoff solution -building I encourage the Planning Commission reject the requests. 17-3929 seeks variances for average lakeshore setbacks, bluff setback variances, and a conditional use permit for grading. The proximity of this property to Long Lake and the slope of the property towards Long Lake suggests that any variance approvals be paired with rain/storm water remediation best management practices. Long Lake is an impaired lake with phosphorus and other chemical levels that inhibit its ability to recover. Members of the commission who grew up on Lake Minnetonka in the 1970s will recall what that body of water looked and felt like, and they will likely recall the "Save The Lake" campaign that began that lake's recovery. That's where Long Lake is today, and that's without the invasive species that compound the problems! Any variances granted to this property/project also should seek commensurate rainwater runoff treatment using rainwater gardens or similar management practices to infiltrate runoff before it reaches the lakeshore. The pool deck is a hardscape surface that will shed its rainwater to the lake, and employing remediation techniques uphill from the lakeshore towards the pool deck will keep excess contaminated water from a 100 - year rain event from the lake. " Again, any variance approval should be met with rainwater remediation techniques to protect the lake. I truly hope the Planning Commission will look at these comments as positive and encouraging of the variance process as long as it includes commensurate requirements for water quality protection so that other efforts to return Long Lake and Lake Minnetonka's watershed to a healthier state aren't negated Respectfully, Christopher 3ones, Orono Vt6cowtv APR 17 MI MV Of OR0190 Date Application Received: 03/22/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/22/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 05/21/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner April 17,2017 Item #08 - I *Aeni& - 0411712017 - Atal Pages 25] #17-3929 Todd Irvine o/b/o Antoinette Beenders, 1669 North Farm Road Variance & Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR- I A, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2. 0 acre/200' width Lot Area: 135,438 s.f. (3.1 ac.) Lot Width: 205'+ at lakeshore, 270'+ at 75' lake setback line Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval for replacement and/or reconstruction of deck, and pool as well as replacement or removal of existing retaining walls on the lake side of the existing residence. CUP required for grading work as well as variances for average lakeshore setback encroachment and bluff encroachment. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Pertinent Code Sections Sec. 78-966 thru 78-968 — Land Alteration Standards Sec. 78-1279(6) Average Lakeshore Setback Sec. 78-1279(2 & 3) Bluff Impacts Sec. 78-1283 Construction on Steep Slopes Sec. 78-1286 Topographic Alterations / Grading & Filling in Shorelands List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative & Practical Difficulties Statement Exhibit C Existing Conditions Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey/Site/Grading Plan Exhibit E. Landscape Development Plan (Sheet L-1) Exhibit F Landscape Elevation Views (Sheet D-1) Exhibit G. Airphoto Depicting Average Setback Line Exhibit H. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I. Site Airphotos Exhibit J Plat Map Exhibit K. Property Owners List Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] FILE # 17-3929 April 17, 2017 Page 2 of 6 Background & Analysis The applicants are requesting variance and CUP approval in order to replace existing decks, retaining walls and swimming pool, all located on the lake side of the existing residence. The project also involves regrading of the south and west yards adjacent to the pool area and eliminating a multi -tiered retaining wall system in favor of a single tier system. The property is a fairly steep lakeshore lot on North Farm Road, and the existing home was constructed in 198 1. While the house and pool/decks/walls are tucked into the top of a slope that today is defined as a bluff, they were all constructed prior to City ordinances that would have required variances for such construction. All of the proposed work is more than 100 feet from the lakeshore and appears to be at least 75 feet from the nearest wetlands. A wetland delineation has been planned for this spring to confirm no wetland setback issues. Average Setbac: . In addition to structure and grading within a bluff feature, the westerly half of the proposed reconstruction is located lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. The westerly deck (a second story deck) will encroach slightly further lakeward than the existing deck and patio, while in the pool area the encroachment will be approximately the same or slightly less. Exhibit G depicts the relationship among applicants' house and the two existing adjacent lakeshore homes that define the line. The house to the east on Long Lake Boulevard will be completely unaffected by the encroachment. The house to the west sits much further back, and since the very minor additional encroachment of the expanded patio and deck will be lower in the topography, it is unknown whether that owner has any objection to the plan nor any real views over the second story deck proposed. It is also noteworthy that an apparent view easement established as part of the original subdivision covenants is at the comer of the proposed deck (not enforceable by City). Site Grading, Bluff I!npacts. The grading within the lakeshore yard would appear to be necessary in order to match the new grades resulting from removal of the tiered retaining walls. Proposed grading plans suggest that approximately V-1.5' of fill will be added in an area approximately 40' x 90', totaling in the neighborhood of 500-600 cubic yards. Existing slope in this area is in the 30-35% range, while the proposed slope is in the 35-40% range. The proposed slope will be more uniform, smoothing out some of the minor variations of the existing slope. It appears there will be a few trees removed as part of this grading plan. Along the easterly yard, again the tiered retaining wall system will be removed in favor of a single wall system. In this area existing slopes range from 18% to 36%, and at the base of the slope is a drainageway within an existing drainage easement. Proposed re -grading after the tiered wall is removed will result in a uniform slope of about 34-36% or between 2.5:1 and 3:1. Grading plans indicate that the drainageway will not be filled or graded; however, a temporary culvert in the drainageway is proposed, to allow construction vehicle access from Long Lake Boulevard. Total fill in this area is (very roughly) estimated by staff at another 500 cubic yards, and will range up to perhaps 2' deep where it replaces the retaining walls. The proposed slopes at 2.5:1 or 3:1 are at the limit of what is maintainable as yard area. The applicants should be asked to discuss what they intend for permanent ground cover in these sloped areas. Grading and filling in a bluff area is generally prohibited, and the existing structures in this area would likely not be allowed under today's codes. However, their replacement substantially in kind with only minor revisions to allow for greater safety would Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] FILE # 17-3929 April 17, 2017 Page 3 of 6 appear to be reasonable and have no additional impacts on the bluff if appropriate erosion control and permanent vegetation measures are implemented. Pool Retaining Walls, Stain�Lay. Construction of the proposed retaining walls in excess of 4 feet in height will require engineering. A stairway adjacent to the easterly pool wall is propose, to replace the existing freestanding step system located further east of the existing retaining walls and the existing stair system extending from the westerly decks. Governing Regulations: Variance (Sec. 78-123). In reviewing applicationsfor variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and we�fare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when (staff commentary in bold type): 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Singlefamily residences are a permitted use within the LR -1A zoning district. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The residential principal structure and associated amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding propertiesfor residential use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the configuration and location of the existing amenities is such that their reconstruction and replacement do not meet the standards of the Zoning Code. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The extremely lengthy lake setback of the adjacent home to the immediate west establishes a setback line that makes the existing and proposed amenities nonconforming; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Because the proposed encroachments of the average setback line are essentially replacing existing very similar encroachments, no impact to the character of the neighborhood will result. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] FILE # 17-3929 April 17, 2017 Page 4 of 6 City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The average setback encroachments are afactor unique to thisproperty because ofthe unusually large lake setback of the neighboring property to the west 5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property in the neighborhood, however, the conditions which require the variance are unique to his property. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has a right to maintain the existing amenities involved, but they have deteriorated to a point where they need to be replaced. Proposed replacement will actually result in condensing the footprint of the encroachments. 7. The granting of the proposed variances will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. In the opinion of staff, granting of the average setback variance will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the property owner to replace existing deteriorated amenities with new very similar amenities makingfor a safer situation. The Commission may recommend and the Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Conditional use permit approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: (1) The proposed use is consistent with the Community Management Plan (CMP). The proposed use is accessory residential in nature and such use is consistent with the CMP guidingfor this residential neighborhood. (2) The proposed use is compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by Article V, Division 3 of the City Code. Construction of retaining walls and site regrading to the extentproposed requires a conditional usepermit per Article V, Division 3, hence this application. (3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management. The proposed use will be adequately served by existing services andfacilities. (4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system. This criteria is not applicable to this situation. (5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost. Staff believes this criterion is met. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] FILE # 17-3929 April 17, 2017 Page 5 of 6 (6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future. The retaining walls and grading as proposed are expected to have no detrimental effects on adjoining or nearby properties, and are compatible in visual andfunctional aspects with the surrounding properties. (7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The proposed walls and grading are residential in nature and are consistent with similar features in the surrounding lakeshore neighborhood. (8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan. The walls and grading are residential in nature and will be consistent with similarfeatures in the surrounding lakeshore neighborhood. (9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The proposed walls and grading are expected to have no detrimental impacts to the neighborhood and are not expected to affectproperty values. (10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses. The location, orientation and design of the walls and grading plan are such that no screening or buffering will be required NOTE: PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD RE117EW WITH THE APPLICANT WHAT TREES WILL BE REMOVED DUE TO THE GRADINGPLANAND WHETHERANY ADDIONAL SCREENING IS NECESSARY. (11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means. The walls and grading plan are not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD REVIEW WITH APPLICANT THE PLAN FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONACCESS FROM LONG LAKE BOULEVARD. (12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. Other than temporary construction traffic on Long Lake Boulevard, theproposed use will not generate any of these undesirable issues. (13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The residential character of the walls and grading would appear to blend well with the neighborhood, and is expected to have no detrimental environmental impacts. (14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. This criterion is not applicable to this situation. (15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The walls and gradingplan are not expected to have any impact on the health, safety and welfare of the public, and is expected to provide a safer driveway situation for the applicants. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] FILE # 17-3929 April 17, 2017 Page 6 of 6 Issues for Consideration I . Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, and that the criteria for issuance of variances and a CUP are met? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances and CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose additional conditions in order to mitigate any impacts created by the granting of the requested variances and CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance for encroachments of the average lakeshore setback as well as for structures and grading work within the bluff. The extent of the grading to be accomplished also meets the threshold for needing a CUP and staff recommends approval of a CUP for the grading work, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to review temporary acces from Long Lake Blvd and the temporary culvert through the drainage easement with the City Engineer, subject to his approval. No impacts to the drainageway will be allowed. 2. Applicant to provide a vegetation management plan for review by staff and Council in response to the grading plan that results in unusually steep slopes. 3. Applicant to conform to all MCWD erosion control requirements. 4. Planning Commission to recommend whether any replacement screening will be required. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] City of Orono Variance Application PC Exhibit A $700 —$70075 $2,50CI Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (attach additional 'sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORM I N: chqck here if Applicant ad ress should be used for billing Applicant: MT -W 'Gele!*' Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: '�-�e4q City: Email: 1WA)nA4%ZA,C0/M PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant Name: check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: City: zi���Z§P- Email: !Q14 7) . ��q tV A4.,7 APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantlowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. t Information will be d1strib Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Variance Application — January 2017 Page 4 ""2' Date: .53 - Date: Date: REeEIVE6- D Date: MAR 22 2017 # 3929 CITY OF ORONO StreetAddress: Application # 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Date Received: Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address. P.O. Box 66 Fee - Escrow - 1 SHO Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Notes: $700 —$70075 $2,50CI Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (attach additional 'sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORM I N: chqck here if Applicant ad ress should be used for billing Applicant: MT -W 'Gele!*' Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: '�-�e4q City: Email: 1WA)nA4%ZA,C0/M PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant Name: check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: City: zi���Z§P- Email: !Q14 7) . ��q tV A4.,7 APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantlowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. t Information will be d1strib Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Variance Application — January 2017 Page 4 ""2' Date: .53 - Date: Date: REeEIVE6- D Date: MAR 22 2017 # 3929 CITY OF ORONO Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] PC Exhibit 8 Practical Difficulties Documentation answers: 1. The existing landscape will be re -built and used in -j similar manner to which it was been used in the past. 2. Given the location of the homes on either side of this property the lakeside setback is in an unusual location and overly limits the development of typical outdoor structures. 3. The landscape features proposed are similar to what exists today and will be in character with the locality 4. Economic consideration is not relevant to this variance application. S. N/A 6. N/A 7. N/A 8. The setback is peculiar in that it was established after the house was built and sets limits on the re-clevelopment of the existing landscape 9. Not sure 10. The application is necessary in order to redeve lop/p reserve the landscape in a more practical way then it currently existing. 11. The current landscape is dangerous and unsafe. The existing timber retaining walls are rotting, the existing decking is deteriorating and the deck rails are unsafe. The new landscape will be built with current building standards and provide the owner and guests a safe environment. 12. The current retaining walls are as tall as 16' in some areas. The proposed plan calls for walls that are 10'tall and will provide more green space. Practical difficulties statement: Rebuilding the existing landscape in the manner it existing today would call for a larger flat area at the lake side of the house then what is being proposed. Our proposed plan calls for a smaller pool, less retaining walls and less deck space. With the proposed more condensed plan we'll achieve less visual impact from the retaining walls, less hard surface and more green space. # 3929 RECEIVED MAR 2 2 2017 CITY OF ORONO Item #08 - PC Agenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties cilteda as they relate to the request, ff they do not apply, wft NIA in the space provided. 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." 3. 'The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." 5. 'Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony wfth this Chapter." 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." Variance Appfication — January 2017 Page 7 # 3929 RECEIVED MAR 22 �Z017 CITY OF ORONO Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." 9. 'The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located.' 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in anyway impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Practical Difficultles Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Variance Application — January 2017 F4 Page 8 MAR 2 2 2017 # 392Aft Y CITY OF ORONO 1,1 HERNIA -wil dN Z E- U) z z E - z 0 z C) Z z 0 L; z 3 P; 6 2 g;� E" eA zt. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] PC Exhibit C F V;H, e e co —Z of I 1 4% 7 M�.Vz2d 1�63R-,Z. 0 z 0 0 <WN cl r z Rr, g g O*a BE Elm 1�3 �7 7 Lj L) i 1�3 ps, Reg I'M. lk low ��'Armw WL IMP'. ami'WA, iow f M M NO M WK al w -7 1 t- 0�""' AF� All w -TAM I ov, JA "dwo �Z- 0-0 .4RP I r -A T V P0. Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 rue 7Ti 1-.5yzy I iorai rages zjj I PC F-Xl 9 Hat, 4z Q � 2 gg iibit D I x 6 Y d qffi�l-.f z 0 N 8 0 EON 'd -.i VA M®RN M El E 0 2 9 gg iibit D Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Tota 81 J, V, 2A 41 FLEV 9R2 61 39 7! PC Exhibit E Vf'o 1 11 �y 'y 5 -.1 7 At� 4� 9 PJ j W 19 a WTV X �v Kftnan & syewen, Inc. 7. �6-41- 1 15119 Ek4L Tdn&.- M 475 Lup F...hft MZ 475 VA7 N it" FARM KC. t, t vwuO Imdocape A"h1tedun STOR) Fkp,�.AL RESI[)FNC'F DECK DESIGN BUILD HUILPINC I Y)IPPNI iREA� 9H r= f 1 L L )C X7; z kJ --------- L I U.V5 N 2t22 -iA7 jV1. C M Dr== ........ . .... .... 96 f, A I -W, L:1 & z MAP �A tit t— V W N. �Ak�4 r.-4 bw---- U) z A j A, 9z 04; z 17 LL r J -47 j I I h—by ­tWy d� dih pl� A ­�z B� Of Nkh�ft Lu TWd k� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------- ------------ -- U) reg. me. 46NO Lu daft mmm IL t AF - — --- --------- — - U) 7 7- — -------- 0 dft. mu-1-2fi­ ------------ < 2017-3-22 -7 ------- — > 7 --- — ---------------- — - — ------ -------- — — ------ ------- ------- — --------- 7 -- — ----- ------------------ — ---- Landscape It 11 Lu Development 11f Plan ----- — ------------ -- 0- i RECEIVED MAR 29- 7017 Nadh 3 CITY OF C y SOUTH ELEVATION HOUSE LMIRK*ff EYMMM494 A? FAR EDGE OF POM PEM AEST ELEVATION FAST ELEVATION RECEIVED Scale lw=1�0' MAR 21? CITY OF ORONO Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] [,,EENAN Keenan & SV&C", Inc. 1.q19Mk.n.ft..k.1ffk& hfl—i." hdi--� 5045 W.A.. M 475 1W F—h.M. %7 475 1641 DESIGN - BUILD Lm&cqw Ardaltecture �.w by.. —W-� &�.UP-M. .0 &0 1 - . d*F.Rw. L..dKw Todd Irvine date: -211IL-Lafi— mideaul:M11-2.20- 2817-1.22 Landscape Elevations D-1 i j # 3929 z z u z One z �.w by.. —W-� &�.UP-M. .0 &0 1 - . d*F.Rw. L..dKw Todd Irvine date: -211IL-Lafi— mideaul:M11-2.20- 2817-1.22 Landscape Elevations D-1 i j # 3929 EAST ELEVATION Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] 01 2- IV 81 Scale 11/81f = if -Oil RECEIVED FRoposED D E CK LOW PLANTNG 15ORDER AT TOP OF WALL SOUTH ELEVATION Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] NEW STO TO LAKE EXISTING TMER RETAINING WALLS Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 Efle Edit yiew lools Add Help File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] + PC Exhibit G A , V, Of Aso* An r -j r "A X We 'JLA -jAk FMI -01 PY a 4-50�- AW f t � - rP, ix nwi, A IN - 7t Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Propeirty Addr,:t&s-. r Prepared by�- Date: e Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier (Circle one) Tier I Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1; EXISTING HARDCOVER 11 the "0110wing lab;a idenO,-i elf �Wris of existing harirajer on the propo,,Irly, key#�,d �y le"4ei to Cerliocatr of Survey "��Vrvpv auuompaF�,Y to ".). M;e as �,any lines a, -Iece:mary jo o2.mrAtelk, depp:A exrE,�Ing hardcovpr statuz of the property� For Tier 1 prnperties, idp.-�Zr, / any �eatures by!elier w4hir'� the 75'WhacK line apd cafwlate h4rdcover square footage separately fbr each portiun. PC Exhibit H Key to Survey Hardcover Rom (Describe) Total Length x Width (Square FoRt iExa *�L (Gareae) (ZC x 301 (7?0 18§,F J)_ Aa j,, -,A, L;N S.F. A,�-iec e -A c -w Lcs 'L� S.F. C kle - 1 -4� C S.F. D Prl&% -2, 5 LV -4,- �,,l C elf 3s's S.F E V.'t si\.j � i e �, et rei(, -1,4 S.F. F .3,', Lj�ke, �_, t L 1 0 S.F, G C "Ic S.F. H (.j, -Y k --K C -,A A�- cAc, S.F. K L S.F. M S.F, N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.R Q S,F. R S.F. 8 S.F. T S.F. S.F. w X (1) Total Pxif!ing .4,;-flciver lt�og ordco"r (S#w City Code See 78.IWJ.- (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. S.F- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S,F, S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Su tract line (2$ ftm line (1)] &F. (4) Total Lot Area P"', Existing Hardcover Percefftge 1(3) + (4) % (Proposed Hardcover next page) VarWnce AaMxwflor; - Januafy 2017 pa,99 71 Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] Z"Mse!P�o City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Froperly Address Prepared by: Date: Stormwatzr-Quali',y OverlayDistricl, Tier (Circle one) Tierl Tier2 Tir-r3 Tier4 TW5 S' ep 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER n the ic,icwip table, icentify am Of chi' t'ne wwefly, keyed %'.y [eiter te Certificato of Suricy ,survey rnur-t arror-pany this form -1 'v)c'ude 0 exislinq 'Naw -drover iturrF: that x -c intPrdetl in remain, a;; wc,11 ar, all P�oposed tiardcnver Rerns miaf %--;l; be added. Use a5 Wny tines a�; nece�isar� 1.0 iw=is-Ai6;V dePict Propo%Vi ha,-dra-vPr 5t2'kr--; 0 VIE P-C-P-Wty. For Tier 11 I-f-Pertios, identify any by �clkpr whic-, Fre WTV11r, Ite 75' setback tinc and calcufats hardcover soua or eac"I VOr-lon. L���e ERZI �tel for rNey to Hardcover kern (Describe) Length x Wdth Total Lsqua a F@QQ (24! x 3D) IT20 S.F.) CTJ 9,4 S.F. A Q r Aj V4.1t< cc?J --Pje:i 2--5 1 S.F. C 90-1 S.F. D IvA C S.F. F S.F. F �-z e A.4c --P,. I r S.F. G S.F. H t 1-1 S.F. S.F. eX C:! JiS S,F. K ;, - S.F. A VV S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.R a S -F, R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. w S.F. x S.F. Y S.F. z S.F.' (1) Total Proposed Hardcover zi -5 S.F. Excludable Hardcover (Ses C�y Code Sac 79-1684)- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _C21 Total ExcludaVe Hardcover ----S.—F" L3) Net f�! �ased Hanicover [Subbad line (2) from line (1)) _f4j Total Lot Area Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)+(4)) % S.F. S.F. Varfance AppYcatiM — denu&ry 2017 Page 12 Item #08 - PC Agenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] PC EXhibit I man CONNECTE.-AxPLORER' 0 Via- -2 off— dr w - 10 to—, IT ir low -4 - S A 4r TOP ON T 4 F J* 'he _Vir AV 4L f y W4 At !!5p 4� A.. 4044%. bm- 4;r A 4C, -.6 ­7� 0 - '*4k Sot A z 4.9 4F - Iw_ V� - k , A.6& 1k , It A —NIP V w rp - - A -9- J %, L N 6 4L Mir Op mup- Auto (Obliclue) - Dates: 2015 - < image 1 of 4 � 04117/2015 LocKIAZa NOR.� CM NECTEXPLORER' ! te MavAulo(Oitho)- Dates:2015, < imagelof3 � 04M612015 it -AS T Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] CL A 0 4k A . W"It 114 4 r ,p _AL fit it G*7 - CONNECTIEOXPLOREW F" -.JOIN— EW Jv 0 WWI r Item #08 - PCAgenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] ntam 11 ... '40 -ONI -41F,% map� AiAo (Oblique) - Date& 2015 - < image I of 4 > 04/16/2015 t4. 41 A, . Itr IN Ir1b, . I J -*� , ON --N '4. ON L-00 KIAI Cp (" E 57 In G C4 - Item #08 - PC Agenda - 0411712017 File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map PC Exhibit J Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 3121/2017 27-118-23-41 -118-23-44 27-1 34-118-23-11 26-11.8--23-32 34-118-23-11 Buffer Size, 350 feet Map Comments,. PID: 2711823440008 Owner� ANTOINETTE BEENDERS Address: 1669 North Farm Road Orono MN 55356 18-23-33 35-118-21-22 0. 1 35-118-23-22 # 3929 0 120 240 480 ft RECEIVED For more information contact: MAR 2 22017 Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 effy C)F CRONO gis.info@hennepin.us # 3929 A0J11V-UtP'UU5-16 i --4— .1.-Jy-TA ap sues (Dom QAv3Av I!jeqeo 91 zesilpi U10XfJ9Ae-AfkMM ep uVe einpeq el q zelidall #08 - PC Agenda - 0J4f1JW*7Sia113L.; saner;ir 940 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 v File #17-3929 [Total Pages 25] 38 26-118-23 33 0007 38 26-ilg-23330030 38 27-119-23 44 0017 RACHEL ANN CARPENTER STEVEN GRONWALL SAMUEL A HAMER 1540 LONG LAKE BLVD 1586 LONG LAKE BLVD NAOMI JO HAMER PC EXhibit K LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 1770 WEST FARM RD 38 27-118-23 44 0011 # ORONO MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0008 38 26-118-23 33 0031 38 27-118-23 44 0018 MICHAEL J FEY/STACHIA L FEY NICOUIE WHEELER 13ENJAMIN R & REBECCA S FIELD 1570 LONG LAKE BLVD 1580 LONG LAKE BLVD 1729 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0011 38 26-118-23 33 0032 38 27-118-23 44 0019 CARL AWAIT & NATALIE AWAIT CAROL JEAN CAJACOB SAMANTHA CAPEN MULDOON 1575 LONG LAKE BLVD 1600 LONG LAKE BLVD PAUL D MULDOON LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 180 1 WEST FARM RD 400 EAST LAKE ST 1699 N FARM RD ORONO MN 55356 3R 26-118-23 33 0012 38 27-118-23 44 0006 JAMES & CYNTHIA 13IGHAM RANDY V ROSENGREN 1545 LONG LAKE 13LVD 1709 NORTH FARM RD LONG I-AKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0016 38 27-118-23 44 0007 MATTHEW J DIERINGER RICHARD W PERKINS TAMI J DIERINGER 1699 NORTH FARM RD 940 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 NICOLE Y KAUFMAN 38 26-119-23 33 0022 38 27-118-23 44 OOo8 SCOTT R & JUL] E A KNUTSON ANTOINETTE BEENDERS 908 DAKOTA AVE N 1669 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0023 38 27-118-23 44 0009 THOMAS A & KARI A STEINKE METRO STAR 9 10 DAKOTA AVE 1650 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0024 38 27-118-23 44 0010 THOMAS C ODEAN PHILIP R KAUFMAN 930 DAKOTA AVE NICOLE Y KAUFMAN LONGLAKEMN 55356 1680 NORTH FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0025 38 27-118-23 44 0011 # 3929 DOUGLAS S HOLMES JR CRAIG L HANSON &JOAN HANSON HANNA HOLMES 1720 NORTH FARM RD 950 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RECEIVED 38 26-118-23 33 0026 38 27-118-23 44 0015 MAR 22 Z017 GLEN FLAHERTY RICHARD PERKINS 400 EAST LAKE ST 1699 N FARM RD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55409 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CiTY OF ORONO vLL096S Q),fjd3AV vaefip3 dn-dDd OSOdxs jaded paaj r 009 Ls eividwel ViieAV esi I CKI OU11 151,1010 PUGg I I v I sleqel @188d Ase! AGENDAITEM Item No.: 17 Date: May 22, 2017 Item Description : Resolution of Appreciation to Michael P. Gaffron Presenter Dennis Walsh Agenda Mayor/Council Report Section: 1. Purpose. To recognize Michael P. Gaffron for his services to the City of Orono. 2. Background. Michael Gaffron is retiring from a career in public service on May 31, 2017. He originally started with the City of Orono on February 6, 1978. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution of Appreciation to Michael P. Gaffron for his service to the City of Orono. Exhibits A. Resolution of Appreciation to Michael P. Gaffron. Prepared By: J. Bamhart Reviewed By: NZ Approved By: D5R A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO MICHAEL P. GAFFRON FOR MORE THAN 39 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Michael P. Gaffron has served the City of Orono since February 6, 1978 in various capacities, including On Site Systems Manager, Septic Systems Inspector, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator, Senior Planning Coordinator, Planning Director, Assistant City Administrator -Long Term Strategy, Senior Planner; and WHEREAS, Michael has skillfully and consistently upheld the vision of the City of Orono throughout his career; and WHEREAS, Michael's career with the City has been marked by a strong commitment to the protection of the environment and the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, Michael has earned the respect and friendship of residents, applicants, developers, co-workers, Commission and Council members for his patience, kindness, knowledge, history, and thorough record keeping; and WHEREAS, Michael has proven to be an irreplaceable and invaluable asset to the City of Orono; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to Michael P. Gaffron for his dedicated service to the City, and does highly commend him for the manner in which he has carried out his duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby extend to Michael its best wishes for a long and healthy retirement. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 22 nd day of May, 2017. ATTEST: Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Dennis Walsh, Mayor