Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, March 13, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda 1. Consent Agenda — Consent agenda items, including (*) asterisk items, are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under this section of the agenda. Items on the Consent Agenda are reviewed in total by the City Council and may be approved through one motion with no further discussion by the Council. Any item may be removed by any Council Member, staff member or person from the public for separate consideration. If you wish to remove any item from the Consent Agenda, please state the item number and description of the item. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Approval of Minutes 2. Council Meeting of February 27, 2017* 3. Council Work Session of February 27, 2017* Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Public Works/City Engineer Report 4. Fox Street Rehabilitation — Approval to Solicit Bids 5. Appointment of 2017 Seasonal Employees 6. Saga Hills Park Project Planning Department Report — Planning Commission Representative - Jon Schwingler 7. 17-3898 Dale Richardson/CBS-MN Properties, 2060 Wayzata Blvd. West, Amend PUD No. 2C Agreement to Allow Daycare Use 8. 17-3899 James Smale Representing Little Acorns Child Care Inc., 2060 Wayzata Blvd. West, Conditional Use Permit for Daycare Use 9. 17-3900 Scott Kirchner, 1090 Heritage Lane, Variance — Resolution 10. 17-3904 Laurel Ulland Architecture/Martha Myers Head, 2090 Shoreline Drive, CUP Variance — Resolution 11. 17-3906 Joshua/Markum Builders, 3472 Lyric Avenue, Variances (Lot area and width) — Resolution 12. 17-3903 Alex Ugorets, 2520 Shadywood Road, Sketch Plan Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, March 13, 2017, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us 13. 17-3894 City of Orono Text Amendment: Non -encroachments - Ordinance 14. 17-3896 City of Orono Text Amendment: Structural Coverage - Ordinance 15. 17-3897 City of Orono Text Amendment: Special Events - Ordinance 16. Comprehensive Plan Community Committees 17. City Planner Recruitment Mayor/Council Report 18. Resolution of Appreciation to Jessica Loftus - Resolution City Administrator's Report 19. City Council Committees Update - Resolution 20. 2016 Budget Adjustments 21. Agreement for Legal Services- Prosecution 22. Website Designer Proposals 23. Claims/Bills* City Attorney's Report Adjournment Upcoming Events A 2017 03-20-17 - Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Aaron Hale Printup Liaison) 03-22-17 - Council Work Session, Wednesday, 5:00 p.m. 03-22-17 - Council Meeting, Wednesday, 7:00 p.m. 04-03-17 - Park Commission Work Session, Monday, 1:00 p.m. 04-10-17 - Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 04-17-17 - Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Victoria Seals) 04-19-17 - Open Book Meeting, Wednesday, 4:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. 04-24-17 - Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 04-24-17 - Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 04-29-17 - Spring Cleanup, Saturday, 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. 04-29-17 - National Take Back Initiative, 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. 05-01-17 - Park Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. 05-08-17 - Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 05-15-17 - Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Wendy Dankey) 05-22-17 - Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 05-22-17 - Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard Crosby, II, Wendy Dankey, Aaron Printup, and Victoria Seals. Representing Staff were City Administrator Doug Reeder, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards, Senior Planner Michael Gaffron, City Planner Melanie Curtis, City Attorney Soren Mattick, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item No. 2 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Printup moved, Seals seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2017 Walsh requested the minutes on Page 17 be corrected under Item No. 18 to read that one of the bonds was closed out in 2013. Walsh moved, Cosby seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono City Council meeting of February 13, 2017, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jay Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, stated he read on the Internet that there would be no comments or discussion at the time Item No. 17 is discussed. Nygard noted most of the people in the audience are here to talk about the docks on Big Island. Walsh indicated that item will be open for public discussion. Nygard asked if he changed what it said on the Internet. Walsh stated he is not aware of what Mr. Nygard is talking about but that they will open it for public discussion. Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, questioned whether the Mayor is really going to wait until Item No. 17 comes up for discussion to allow all these people to speak. Jabbour noted he has provided correspondence to the City Council regarding this item and the history of Big Island. Jabbour commented most people will do things for the betterment of the community unless they are proven otherwise and that he believes the Council is trying to better the community. Jabbour stated from the early 1970s, it was the goal of the City to acquire the island. When it came up for sale in the 1980s, Page 1 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS (continued) the City made sure that it was not sold. A bill was introduced and passed in the MN Legislature giving the public sector one legislative year to get the money together for the purchase. Since that time the City has spent several hundred thousand dollars providing services, such as water boats, firefighters, and water tanks buried on the island. Jabbour stated the City cannot simply refuse to provide 911 services to Big Island. Jabbour stated at the same time, the City got challenged on the Park Dedication Fund and they came up with a plan. Jabbour noted he is repeating this for the audience. Jabbour stated the purchase of Big Island was a phenomenal opportunity for the City, and in the hallway there is a picture of the island signed by a conservative Republican Governor telling the City what a great job they did. Jabbour stated at that time the City made an absolute commitment to the veterans. The veterans had another buyer for the Island but they reversed that sale and allowed the City two years to come up with the money. Jabbour stated he is absolutely dumbfounded that with all the resources, the knowledge, the engineers, the marina owners, etc., that the Council did not reach out to someone and ask for an explanation of why the purchase happened. Instead, the Council just arbitrarily made a decision on it, with very little discussion. Jabbour noted he personally testified, along with Mayor McMillan, in front of the legislature, and that the City received the funding. Jabbour stated the Council gave no hint about a commitment made to the veterans when they voted on the docks. Jabbour stated the City Council should look at the last 11 years. The veterans were given this island in the 1930s by a private individual who was sympathetic to all the veterans coming home from World War I with shellshock. For the last 11 years, the veterans have enjoyed use of the island every single year, and that he could personally tell the Council about the thousands of people that went out with him to the island. Jabbour indicated they put those docks in there so people could enjoy the $7 million investment. In addition, the Water Patrol responds and uses those docks. Jabbour stated they have to be a floating dock because as the water goes up or down, the dock needs to be at a certain height. Jabbour noted the docks are identical to the dock the sheriff put out. Jabbour stated it amazes him that Orono, the richest city in the five -state area, is having a hiccup over a measly $8,000. Jabbour stated it is unfortunate the City does not feel they owe it to the veterans. Mayor Walsh noted there is a five minute limit on public comments and that he would like that limit to apply to everybody. Jabbour stated he would strongly encourage the City Council to reverse their decision on the docks and move on like life never missed a beat. Jabbour stated he cannot imagine the City begging for $8,000 when they had a $635,000 surplus in the budget last year. Jay Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, stated he is a lifetime resident of Orono and that he has served on the City Council, on the Planning Commission, and served in the Navy. Nygard stated he is ashamed and that he cannot believe what this has come to. Nygard stated he could go in depth about it, but that the City Council will be here for a few years leading the community and that they have to be able to think ahead and know what they are actually voting on. Nygard stated they are following a guy who has been backpedaling for a week and saying stuff that is not true. Nygard stated that is not what they came here to do. Page 2 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS (continued) Nygard noted the decision will not affect any of the Council since none of them are veterans. Nygard stated there are approximately 8,000 people in Orono, which amounts to a dollar a person per year. Nygard stated he would authorize the City Council to raise his taxes a dollar a year to help pay for the docks. Bob Brown, 5453 Point Road, Mound, stated as a past Council member, he knows the Council can move items around on the agenda and that he would ask that they move Item No. 17 up on the agenda. Brown stated some of the veterans are pretty elderly and that they should not be kept waiting until the end of the meeting. Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to set Item No. 17 as the next agenda item. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT Dean Acheman, Rosemount, stated he was involved with the original veterans' board of governors and that he was involved with the sale of the island. At the time of the sale, the veterans had other interested parties. Acheman stated what went on at that time was very impressive and that the veterans, the City of Orono, different legislators, and the Minnehaha Watershed District all came together to come up with an agreement where the island would be accessible to the veterans for the long-term and that the accessibility would be safe and easy. As a result, the veterans quickly turned their attention to the offer from the City and the veterans sold the island. Acheman noted there was a state statute in place that said once the sale was made, the money would go into an irrevocable trust, a new board would be formed to oversee that, and that the money would be disbursed for veterans' projects. The $5.3 million that was granted is still in that fund. In the meantime, the veterans have granted $1.6 million to state projects around the State of Minnesota in support of veterans. Acheman stated he is very proud of what happened. Acheman stated for the past 11 years, Gabriel Jabbour has attended their V4V meetings and that he has given them periodic updates on what is happening with the island. Acheman noted in 2007 through 2009 a plan was put in place addressing ADA compliance. Acheman stated he was amazed at what happened in the meeting two weeks ago and that he could not believe that a motion was made to remove the docks and sell them. Acheman stated that is the wrong thing to do and is going backwards on accessibility. Acheman noted he was part of the V4V Trust Fund and that they organized just a few months ago a trip for 36 veterans, 18 of them World War II veterans, to go out to the island and have lunch. Acheman stated the veterans really enjoyed it. Acheman stated he wants the Council to rethink the action that was taken and put it on a course where the veterans can expect safe and easy accessibility as well as to keep the commitment made to the veterans. Walsh thanked him for his service. Page 3 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) Mike McElhaney, Maple Plain, stated he is here tonight on behalf of the Commissioner of the Department of Veteran Affairs and that he is here to read a letter from him. "Dear Members of the Orono City Council. This letter is in reference to Minnesota Veterans for Veterans efforts and the retention of the big island docks. It has been brought to my attention that a generous donor has come forward with an offer to cover the incurred costs involved in putting in and removing the docks for the coming season. The docks have been essential in enabling Minnesota veterans and their families to share in the beauty of Big Island. The core of my concern remains with the necessity of adequate accessibility for our veterans who need assistance due to mobility issues. Hopefully this new financial support will allow sufficient time and resources for an in depth study to find ways to make the docks and Big Island accessible to all Minnesotans. Big Island is a crown jewel of Lake Minnetonka and a recreational destination for thousands of people in the region. As such, all citizens and communities that enjoy all the island has to offer should be encouraged to contribute and continue to support the increased costs that are being incurred by the City of Orono. After almost nine years of use, disabled veterans should not be the victims of any operational cost in the scope of things that are so minimal. Finally, I would be supportive of a joint venture that enables all citizens of Minnesota to enjoy and preserve the beauty of our lakes and, in particular, Big Island on Lake Minnetonka. Sincerely signed Larry Shellito, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs." Van Erickson noted he sent the Mayor and Council an email this afternoon and that he would like to read it so everyone would have a chance to hear it. Erickson stated he is here on behalf of his father-in-law, Bill Lurton, who donated property which is now the dog park just west of here. "As a long-term resident of Orono and to honor the memory of my wife, I gifted 49 acres of land to Orono for use as a passive park. A short while after making this gift numerous years ago, part of the property was condemned by MN/DOT. Subsequently, I modified the gift covenant to allow the City of Orono to utilize some of the proceeds from the condemnation for a portion of the purchase of Big Island Park. I worked with Jim White and Gabriel Jabbour, who were both very honest and upfront and made sure that I was totally in agreement with designating where these proceeds were going, which was in excess of a million dollars. I was then and am now supportive of the City's actions to purchase Big Island with the help of the condemnation money. As a major contributor in the purchase of Big Island, I was excited in 2006 that the Big Island Park would be open and available to all people. As a veteran myself, I was excited that the veterans will still be able to access and enjoy the park. If the docks were not there, I would not be able to access the park myself nor many of my family members who live in and around the Lake Minnetonka area. I cannot imagine too many veterans or people in general going to Big Island if the docks were not there. The docks and the accessibility they bring to all the citizens are one of the main reasons I agreed to have the condemnation money from my wife's park used to help purchase Big Island Park. The other purpose for me being here tonight is at the last City Council meeting Mayor Walsh said that my father-in-law had threatened to sue the City. To set the record straight, I have never sued the City of Orono or threatened to sue the City of Orono, and I do not appreciate being mischaracterized for doing so. Page 4 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) The only thing that I was upset with was the way the City of Orono had treated Susan E. Lurton Park and not taken of it in the early years. It took several meetings with the Orono city employees and getting Mayor McMillan and Gabriel Jabbour to get things corrected. Our family gratefully appreciates all that Mayor McMillan, Gabriel Jabbour and all the other city employees have done in helping to make the Susan E. Lurton Park what it is today. My wife loved animals and she would be very happy to see the park being used as a dog park. So I want to thank each of you responsible for that becoming a dog park today, but I also needed everyone to hear this. I sat in each of those meetings with Gabriel Jabbour, Jim White, Barb Peterson, and my father-in- law. The whole thing was that it was always going to be open and accessible to all people. So to hear what was said in the last meeting was very upsetting. Ross McGlassan, Tonka Bay, stated he is a Vietnam veteran, served seven years on the Minnetonka School Board, served on the LMCD for three years, worked on the Minnehaha during its restoration and was its first captain. McGlassan stated they held many, many successful events out at the campground and that he thoroughly enjoyed that. McGlassan stated he is also one of the founders and past presidents of the Lake Minnetonka Rotary Club. When the Rotary Club was formed, a commitment was made that the differentiator of our club would be the stewardship of Lake Minnetonka. McGlassan stated the first thing they did was they got a law passed outlining phosphate fertilizer from running into the lake. McGlassan stated he then met with former City Administrator Ron Morse where the Rotary Club offered to build an ADA adaptable asphalt trail up the hill from the end of the dock. McGlassan stated it is one thing to have a dock there, but if it simply stops at a pile of sand, wheelchairs cannot make it through. McGlassan stated from the beginning they were thinking forward about all the possibilities that could happen out there. McGlassan stated little did they expect that they would be put into a negative position by the City Council. McGlassan stated they are all constituents of the lake and that he would like to thank the City of Orono for assuming the responsibility for being the owner. McGlassan encouraged the City Council to find a solution to this, noting there are multiple groups of people that can help come up with a viable, long-term solution to protect this most precious asset. Bill Cochrane, Eden Prairie, stated he was born and raised in this part of the country and that he still has extended family in Orono. Cochrane noted his brother-in-law just recently moved away but that he still has friends on the lake. Cochrane stated he and a grade school friend were drafted after graduating from college and that when they were younger, they would go to Big Island in the wintertime. Cochrane commented it is a special spot for him. Cochrane noted he is the vice chair for the Veterans for Veterans Trust Fund and also the senior hospital representative at the VA Hospital. Cochrane indicated he has put in approximately 7,500 hours of service time there. Page 5 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) Cochrane stated the action that was taken at the last City Council meeting was mind boggling and that what came out of that last meeting was kind of jaw dropping. Cochrane stated in his view the Council and the mayor acted in a manner where they did not give a lot of thought to what they were doing. Cochrane stated it was pretty immediate the way it went down. Cochrane stated in the scheme of life it is pretty simple and that for every action there is a reaction. Cochrane stated in his view during the past two weeks the Council got a good sense of the reaction. Cochrane stated he feels very strongly that the City Council needs to restore the maintenance fees of putting the docks in and out and that it needs to stay a line item in the City's budget. Cochrane stated the City should not be relying on private donations for that since it is an integral part of the community. Cochrane stated he would like to see his fellow veterans and especially people with disabilities be able to use that park. Willie Pargo stated he has been listening to people speak about the convenience of the docks at Big Island. Pargo questioned the liability for the City of Orono if someone got hurt on that island. Pargo noted one life helicopter ride would probably cost the price of those docks and that he would ask the Council to rescind the order and replace the docks. Brad Erickson, 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard, noted that he owns the Orono service station and that his late father served during the Cuban missile crisis. Erickson stated what it boils down to is the City made a deal with the veterans prior to this City Council to keep access open in perpetuity. The City last year spent $150,000 to $160,000 to put the fence around the dog park, which indicates to him that dogs are important to the City. Erickson stated having heard what he has heard already tonight, he believes the Council is moving in the right direction already, but that he just wants to say that a deal is a deal with the veterans. The veterans held up their end of the agreement and that it probably is not legal to let them down at this point. If that were even possible, there would be a stain on the City as far as whether the City cares more about dogs and taking care of dogs than the veterans. Erickson stated he doesn't think so and that he would really urge the Council to reconsider. Erickson stated he realizes there are other problems with vandalism and such but that they should put on their problem solving hats. Erickson stated the City Council does work for these people whether they are Orono citizens or not and that they just have to figure it out. Bob Brown, Mound, asked whether the Mayor would like to keep the discussion going or whether they would like to vote on it now. Walsh indicated he will let the veterans go for as long as they would like to go. Brown stated the veterans were part of an organization back in 1992 to take over the maintenance of Big Island Park. With the help of Mr. Jabbour, the veterans took care of the island while it was a veterans camp. Brown indicated he has the City of Orono Nature Management Plan and on Page 26 it says, sites and facilities management goal, improve access to mobility within the park. Objective, provide docks and landing areas to allow for the public access by boats. Brown noted that is one of the goals outlined in Orono's plan. Page 6 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) On page 37 it says the City should establish a budget for ongoing maintenance and improvement of the Big Island Natural Nature Park. Brown stated it is his understanding that the City of Orono has done that up until now when they voted to take away the docks. Brown noted Mr. Crosby did not raise his hand when they asked if anyone was a veteran but that it is his understanding he served in the fire department. Brown thanked him for his service. Brown stated he has his whole honor guard here and that there are weekly funerals where they are burying his fellow veterans. Brown stated whenever they present a flag, it means another veteran is gone. In past years they had the ability to take veterans out to the island and that once a year they clean the whole island. Brown stated the Council needs to decide if they want the veterans to continue to visit the island. Brown stated the $8,000 is minimal when they are serving people who served them. Brown stated he would ask someone on the Council to make a motion to reconsider their previous action. Pam Sawchuk, 4105 Watertown Road, stated she read in the Pioneer what was going on and she could not believe it. Sawchuk stated there are a lot of gray areas in life, but when it comes to our veterans that put their lives on the line, they should not worry about $8,000. Sawchuk stated people owe them some beauty for the hell they likely witnessed. Sawchuk questioned how this could be one of the richest communities in not only Minnesota but in the country and they cannot come up with $8,000 for the veterans. Len Freeman, 190 Cygnet Place, stated he has lived here for 19 years and that he heard and read about this. Freeman stated as a resident of Orono, it makes sense to come up with the money to support the veterans unless there are some other serious issues going on. Todd Kemery, Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, stated he is the vice president of the Paralyzed Veterans of America, Minnesota Chapter, as well as the advocacy director and ADA coordinator. Kemery stated after reading the City's management plan, he applauds the City's design to include those people with mobility issues and the disabled. Kemery stated there are probably other people who will be more articulate in expressing the needs and desires of the veterans, but that the history of the Paralyzed Veterans includes not only advocating for disabled veterans and all veterans but that they are in a unique position in being part of the disability community in Orono. Kemery stated he has been asked to lend a presence and a voice to some of the most vulnerable of our population. It is the City Council's responsibility and challenge to be inclusive of those that need that extra bit of help. The disabled cannot do anything unless there is an agreement that there are things that would make it easier for the disabled segment of the population. Kemery stated he would challenge the Council to include accessibility at the front end with the management of Big Island. Dennis Libby, 1000 Heritage Lane, stated he has spent about 20 years living on Lake Minnetonka and am an avid boater and a hobby historian. Libby indicated he has spent countless hours studying the history of Big Island amusement park and the veterans park. Libby stated periodically he has been here at odds with the City Council and that once again he finds himself at odds with a very sensitive subject matter. Libby stated in his officership for the Foxhill Ownerships Association has been partially responsible for the fourth or fifth largest commercial dock on Page 7 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) the lake. The dock system is seasonal and has to be brought in and out every year. The homeowners association got a little tired of some of the costs and also the maintenance. Libby stated as part of the resolution of their dock problems, the homeowners association purchased maintenance -free, low cost, low upkeep dock systems to replace the dock that was more expensive. Libby stated in the City's vision and planning, they should think about accommodating the Minnehaha, which is a historical land cruiser that went back and forth to Big Island. The boat originally took 2500 people per trip to Big Island. Libby stated the Minnehaha is a wonderful historic remnant of Orono's history. Libby stated to have a dock that large and impractical and expensive is foolish. If the dock has value, even half the value that it had when it was purchased approximately ten years ago, the Council's original idea of looking at the value of that and possibly selling it is a creative alternative. Libby stated the City needs to look at something that services the community and also allows the veterans easy access. Libby stated the City should look at the revenue that they have and think about it in this collective effort that they are trying to put together. Libby stated the City should find something that is practical and economical that works better both for the city budget and the people who enjoy and use the park. Lindsay Freeman, 190 Cygnet Place, stated she wants to be a resident of a City who is kind and compassionate and shares their assets with others. Freeman stated the veterans have fought for us and that anything they can do to make Big Island more accessible to them is the kind of City she wants to be a part of. Cindy McDonnell, 1420 Baldur Park Road, stated she was shocked and frankly embarrassed at what has transpired in Orono with this decision. McDonnell stated they broke with standard protocol on this, violated the Comprehensive Plan, broke the agreement with the vets, and did not receive public input on this issue despite being advised by the City Administrator that that was part of the protocol. McDonnel stated that is not what the citizens expect from their elected leaders and they do not expect them to be so myopic and short-sighted in their decision making. McDonnell stated in the future it is her hope that the Council takes the time to think fully about these issues and follow established protocol before making willy-nilly decisions such as removing access to a public park for large groups of people. This park is used by many families, seniors, and Orono residents in addition to the vets who have served our country so valiantly. McDonnell stated she does not see any good reason why the Council cannot re-establish the $8,000 to put the docks in and out every year since it is paltry in comparison to some of the other costs the City has. Brad McDonnell, 1420 Baldur Park Road, stated he served six years in the Navy and that a veteran's service is a very personal thing and that they all have their challenges. Each veteran went through different challenges and experiences but they all have a common bond for our brothers and sisters. McDonnell stated when he goes to Big Island with his family, he is able to get in touch with himself and nature. A lot of the veterans do not have the money to get there but they can get there if there is a dock. McDonnell stated they cannot have access to the island without a dock and that he would ask the Council to please rethink their decision and let their children enjoy this treasure. Page 8 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) Joe Wytovick, Bloomington, stated he read in the paper about the last Council meeting that one of the Council Members insinuated that it would be alright for the veterans to jump off the boat onto the shore. Wytovick stated the only place he knows where servicemen jumped off a boat was at Normandy and Omaha Beaches and that half of them got killed. Wytovick stated he just wants to remind the Council of the veterans with this forget-me-not flower. Wytovick requested the Council put their forget-me-not where they can see it every day just so they can remember what the veterans have done for this country and them individually. Doug Schmidt, 1475 Shoreline Drive, stated he is not a veteran but he appreciates all their great service. Schmidt stated he uses the docks and the island for pleasure and he would like to propose the City add two more docks. Schmidt commented going to Big Island is similar to going to the Apostle Islands. Michael Mason, Spring Park, stated a frequent term that is used is thank you for your service. These are the words that people recognize veterans with. Mason stated when he grew up, he learned that actions speak louder than words. Mason stated having said that, he would like to thank the Council for their service but that they should do it with actions that honor the veterans in the community. Lloyd Day, 25 Pleasant Avenue, Tonka Bay, stated he is here tonight representing Clarence Cloffer, Post 259, Shorewood. Day stated what the audience is trying to do tonight is gain some opportunity. Day stated he works at the American Legion and that he has an opportunity to do some wonderful things to help the veterans that come through the door. Day stated a large number of veterans suffer from TBI and PTSD and that one of the best things to do for them is to get them outdoors. Day stated they need to have this opportunity for the veterans to utilize Big Island and that these docks will allow that. Day stated the docks are not exclusive to the Minnehaha and that this is about veterans and the opportunity to give veterans what they need. John Kakenaut, Brooklyn Park, stated he grew up in Minnetonka and was on the lake all the time as a child. Kakenaut stated he wants to say that he appreciates everyone bringing this up and that it was a heck of a hornet's nest that was stirred but it is good it is being discussed. Kakenaut stated in his view the Council is not antimilitary by any chance and that he knows the mayor has hired veterans, has a veteran for a partner, and takes it seriously with the Wounded Warriors. Kakenaut stated he is sorry the Council is getting a lot of flack but that he knows they will do the right thing. Michael Stedman, Coldwell Banker, stated in 2006, he had the privilege and honor of representing Dean Acheman, Bill Ruly and the veterans of the state to help them sell Big Island. Their main goal at the time was to help the GIs as they came back with health care needs. Stedman stated as was referenced by Gabriel Jabbour, the veterans had a very solid transaction to sell the island but they took a step back and worked with the City and Gen Olson and the state to do the right thing. Stedman stated it was a win/win situation and they were able to keep it as a park. Stedman requested the Council do the right thing. Walsh stated he would like to thank all the veterans here tonight and that it is nice to see such a great group of people. Walsh stated as a six-year-old he received his grandfather's flag and that it sits in his house every single day. Walsh stated he also had a relative who fought in the Revolutionary War. Walsh stated he takes the veterans and their service very seriously. Page 9 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) Walsh stated the intent was never to have a dock at Big Island and that the whole issue has never been a financial issue. Walsh stated it has never been about the $8,000 and that he would like to set the record straight on that matter. Walsh stated he does applaud the Veterans Affairs gentleman and that he completely agrees with him on getting a partnership moving forward. Walsh stated the whole issue has been more of a philosophical issue and that it is not a right or wrong question. Walsh stated what has been proven here today by all the different people that are here from the different parts of the community is that Big Island is a community asset and it needs to be inclusive of everybody. Walsh stated the philosophical part of that to him is it screams for a public-private partnership and that the intent was to see if there are people who want to give back to the community to celebrate this community asset. Walsh stated he has more people knocking down his door from different parts of the community who want to be involved in this and to give back. Walsh stated the second part that he wanted to talk about with the Council is looking back at that 2007 plan. What that plan talks about as well is having community participation and trying to figure out how to best use this island as a community. Walsh stated he is proposing to the Council that they form a Big Island committee of people from the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Park Commission, and as many people from the general public that want to be involved in order to figure out how we can make this island more accessible and usable to the public. Walsh stated over the past ten years what they have seen is vandalism, which has resulted in the veterans having fewer things to enjoy. Crosby commented there is also missing people and that he partook in a search on Big Island that took over eight hours. Crosby stated the thought was that she was probably murdered but she was finally found. Crosby stated at night the island can propose a problem, but that he agrees with what the mayor is saying. Walsh stated this is really about getting the community back involved in Big Island and figuring out whether these are appropriate docks, are there too few, too many docks. Walsh stated he is not a dock expert, and if you look back at the minutes in 2008, the docks were purposely configured for the Minnehaha. Walsh stated he wants to get as many people from the public involved as possible. Walsh stated he also wants to see how they can bring more visibility and attention to this island. Walsh stated he does not have all the answers on how to do that, which is why he would like to get this group together to figure out different ideas and how to implement them and how to fund them. Walsh stated there is a lot of people who would like to give back and that money has never been an issue. Walsh stated the issue is bringing it to the public since it is a public island and to let the public back into it. Bob Brown stated he is the one who referred to the City of Orono Big Island Nature Management Plan, which says that the City should establish a budget for ongoing maintenance and improvements. Brown asked whether the Council has already voted to remove the docks. Walsh indicated the Council voted to remove the docks and then they also talked about a public-private partnership after that. Brown stated he understands that but that the Council has already voted to have them removed. Brown stated the plan refers to ongoing maintenance and improvements of the island. The plan also says to Page 10 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) provide docks and landing areas to allow for public access. Brown stated voting to remove them is not ongoing maintenance or improvement. Brown noted the Mayor said it is not about the $8,000. Brown stated the docks are being stored for free and that the only maintenance the City has to do is put the docks in and take them out. After that there are other people who take care of the island. Brown asked why the Council has already voted to remove the docks instead of saying they will look into things if it is not the $8,000. Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, stated the City might go backwards if everyone starts sending the City the bills of what the private sector has been doing on the island. Jabbour stated the public sector is paying hardly any money for Big Island. Jabbour noted the LMA sends a crew out there to clean twice a year and they are a hired crew. Jabbour stated he takes them out to the island and that they bring all the garbage back, which is two days' worth of time. Jabbour indicated he also took his tractor out there to mow the lawn for many years. Jabbour stated at the time the docks were purchased, the City did make sure the dock accommodated the Minnehaha in case public transportation was needed. Jabbour stated his boat requires those docks and that he strongly disagrees with Mr. Libby. Jabbour indicated he owns the most docks in Minnetonka and that he does not need a dock but the veterans need a dock. Jabbour stated he applauds the Council for trying to do a mid -course correction, but that there was not a lot of thought about who uses the docks prior to the Council's decision. The Minnetonka Yacht Club utilizes the docks. Minnetonka Portable Dredging has donated its labor. Jabbour noted he has sent the Council photographs of some of the work being done on the island. Jabbour commented Aaron Printup has been on the Council for six years and Mayor Walsh has been on the Council for three years. Jabbour noted he reported to the Council on Big Island and that there were never any questions. Jabbour stated he is now dumbfounded by the Council. Jabbour stated he will be more than happy as long as he owns property on Lake Minnetonka to store the docks for free. The docks are located strategically next to the dredging company and are identical to the docks the sheriff's department just put in. Jabbour commented he has never ever gone to the moon, he has never ever charged a dollar or have gotten reimbursed one dollar for his work. Jabbour cautioned the Council to be careful since they might have to provide inside trails compliant with ADA and they might end up finding they need four more docks. Jabbour stated he knows the Council would like to go to docks made for a residence, but if that is the case, anytime someone needs decking, they can go out to Big Island get it. Jabbour stated he owns property on the island and that he is more experienced than anybody about what happens on the Island. Jabbour noted both Council Member Printup and Mayor Walsh voted for the sheriff's dock. Jabbour stated they tried to figure out how to get an ambulance to roll things in and out from the dock. Jabbour stated these are not fancy docks but are simple commercial docks. Jabbour stated he would challenge the Council to see if there is zero maintenance in ten years with a different type of dock. Jabbour stated a private/public partnership has existed and is what Orono was founded on. This island was given to the veterans by a gentleman that also gave Three Rivers 70 -plus acres that is now a wildlife refuge Jabbour stated the private -public partnership is nothing new but that the Council had better be careful because they might have to come up with a lot more money. Page 11 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) Walsh thanked Gabriel Jabbour for his past service to the City and that what he has said underscores his point about having a committee talk about what is appropriate. Walsh stated he is not in the dock business and Dennis Libby is not in the dock business. Walsh stated this is about having the conversation about Big Island, which has been missing in the past. Walsh stated he would like to get a group together to talk about it and then document the conversation about what to do moving forward. Jay Nygard stated to summarize, Gabriel Jabbour is absolutely right about putting a residential dock out there. In addition, the decks are going to be disappearing left and right and the City will never have any idea who took them. Nygard stated the current docks are the best solution. Nygard stated what he has heard tonight is that everybody is frustrated with the Council for acting without thinking first. Nygard stated the Council can go ahead and figure out what might work better but that they shouldn't pull the rug out from under these people. Nygard noted these people made a commitment to this country and gave their word. The City of Orono gave its word to these people and it is time for the Council to make a motion to rescind what they did, which will honor your word, and then the City can work on a better change. Nygard stated he would ask the Council to make a motion to do it and that they can do whatever else they want to, but the docks are the crux of the situation. Walsh commented that was preaching to the choir as well and that he appreciates the grandstanding a little bit there. Walsh noted he has already said the docks are going to stay there. Walsh stated the issue is what is the appropriate dock and that this has been a good conversation. Nygard asked if he is saying that the City is not going to stand up to their agreement. Walsh stated he does not understand what he is referring to. Bob Brown asked for some clarification since there appears to be some confusion. Brown asked if the City has removed the current docks or if they are going to keep the current docks. Walsh stated that was the discussion about whether they are the appropriate docks. Brown asked if they are going to keep the current docks if this is not resolved. Brown stated the current docks are really nice docks. Brown asked why this is an issue and why they are thinking of removing the docks. Walsh stated the docks are not there right now since this is winter. Walsh stated they are not talking about not putting the docks there and that he has already made that statement. Walsh stated it is more about the conversation if these are the appropriate docks. Walsh stated if you go back and read the minutes from 2008, the purpose of the docks was to accommodate the Minnehaha; and if they are the appropriate docks, then they stay. Walsh stated that's why he wants to put together a committee to discuss it. Jabbour stated it is painfully obvious that they have already made up their mind and that there is a plan that has been articulated by Mr. Libby. Jabbour stated he heard it a few days ago at the LMA and that in his view they may have violated the open meeting law by doing that. Jabbour stated he does not understand it. Life went wonderful for 11 years. Jabbour noted he was the custodian of the island during Page 12 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. BIG ISLAND DOCK PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT (continued) that time and none of this was a crisis. Jabbour stated the Council should just admit they were wrong and then leave it alone. Walsh stated he would like to bring this item back to the Council. Todd Kemery, Paralyzed Veterans of America, stated the reason he is here is the accessibility factor. Kemery asked whether there will still be accessibility to the island while the committee is being formed. Walsh indicated there will be. Seals stated many people have reached out to her and shared powerful stories about being a veteran. Seals stated she does not mean to speak for the Council or the Mayor, but that it never came to their minds that they should take away the docks to prevent access for the veterans. Seals stated she has had a lot of phone calls and emails and lots of great conversations. Seals stated from listening to everyone tonight, it sounds like a solution would be to keep the docks where they are, and then the second part would be to have a committee to say what else can we do to make it more accessible. Seals stated the reason why she is recommending this is because she can see there are many joys associated with the island but that the Council was thinking of all the challenges. Seals stated it's hard to manage since it's in the middle of the lake and that the docks need to be stored somewhere. Seals stated the Council was thinking there has to be a better way. Seals stated maybe the solution is to keep the docks right now and then the second part would be to enact a committee from the community that includes many from the room. Pam Sawchuk stated she has the Pioneer article right here. Sawchuk asked whether the Mayor is going to ask for a retraction or ask them to clarify and amend what they have reported. Walsh indicated he will be because they never called any of the Council Members. Sawchuk stated the article says they are specifically being removed because of the costs. Walsh stated the intent all along was what Council Member Seal has said. Bob Brown stated that was a great suggestion and would eliminate the idea that any of us have that the docks are going to be removed. Brown stated the Council's other motion was to remove the docks. Walsh stated the intent was wrong and they will correct that. Walsh stated the Council would like some time to make three motions. Walsh stated he wants the veterans to have time to finish but that he needs time for three motions. Seals moved, Crosby seconded, to keep the current Big Island docks and to install them in the spring. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to accept the private donations from the following individuals and groups: Shawn Foy, Orono resident; Michael Williams, a St. Louis Park resident; Orono Lions, Page 13 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. Richie Anderson, North Shore Marina; the Tim Stevenson family; the John Kakenaut family; and the Denny Walsh family. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Walsh moved, Seals seconded, to create a Big Island committee consisting of members from the Orono City Council, the Orono Park Commission, the Orono Planning Commission, and as many people from the general public, as well as veterans, as possible to figure out how to make Big Island better and more acceptable. Printup stated he was glad to hear from a number of people on this item and that he had a good conversation with Mr. Brown. Printup stated he also spoke with Bill Anderson, who could not be here tonight, but that they went over a packet of material on the history of Big Island. Printup stated he was against the purchase of the park originally but that he will step back from that at this time since they appear to be making some pretty good progress. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 8:30 p.m. to 8:33 p.m.) PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT *3. LONG LAKE CREEK SUBWATERSHED PARTNERSHIP — RESOLUTION NO. Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO., a Resolution to Partner with Other Intergovernmental Agencies to Pursue and Show Support in Pursuit of a Grant to Improve Water Quality in the Long Lake Creek Subwatershed by Studying the Impact of CARP. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Z! 11 DER -11]e/11 NVAT/ 04 Z"1111119 *111 7 Elm I 113em 7 DMI) ELM 11130011 Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO., a Resolution Establishing Seasonal Weight Restrictions on Orono Public City Streets. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *5. SEWER AND WATER EXTENSION — 701 DICKEY LAKE ROAD Printup moved, Seals seconded, to approve the sewer and water extensions and to waive the connection fees. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *6. INSULATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Printup moved, Seals seconded, to accept the quotation in the amount of $7,415 from Foam -It, LLC, for spray foam insulation of the Public Works building. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 14 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 7. PARK COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS — RESOLUTION NO. Walsh noted the Council interviewed three candidates before tonight's meeting for the Park Commission and that he would recommend Natalie Williams and Brian Roath be appointed as commissioners, with Beth Davis and Rick Carter being appointed as alternates. Printup moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO., a Resolution Designating Appointments to the Orono Parks Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (The Orono City Council recessed from 8:35 p.m. to 8:38 p.m. for the HRA meeting) PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 8. #16-3814 ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF PETER AND MELISSA SANTRACH, 1700 BOHN'S POINT ROAD, REVISED HOUSE LOCATION — RESOLUTION NO. Sven Gustafson, Stonewood, LLC, and Kathryn Alexander, Architect, were present. Gaffron stated in April of 2016, the applicants were granted a variance to allow construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence on a lot consisting of 0.62 acres in area where 1.0 acres in area is normally required. Since that approval the applicants have made revisions to their plan to change the footprint and location of the structure to be lakeward of the average setback line. In addition, the applicants are requesting 16.70 percent structural coverage rather than the 14.99 percent originally proposed. Hardcover will remain at the previously approved percentage. The increase in structural coverage results in the need for an additional variance that was not originally applied for nor granted. In the opinion of Staff, the minor building size and location changes lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line will have a minimal impact on the lake views enjoyed by the adjacent properties. Staff does not recommend granting any approval for the increase in structural coverage pending Council action regarding the structural coverage ordinance. If Council action results in eliminating the need for a variance, no further review is necessary. If a variance is ultimately required, Staff would recommend that a new application be filed. Walsh stated he could not tell on his map if a deck is going into the 0-75 foot area. Alexander stated the whole building is behind the 75 -foot line. Alexander stated to her understanding that is an elevation. Walsh stated he did not have any issues with anything else. Gustafson stated the elevation of the patio is the same as previously. Gustafson indicated the area is all raised up above grade with foundation retaining walls. Previously that area was filled in with dirt and now it will be excavated out. Page 15 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 8. #16-3814 ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF PETER AND MELISSA SANTRACH, 1700 BOHN'S POINT ROAD, REVISED HOUSE LOCATION — RESOLUTION NO. (continued) Printup stated he is fine with the average lakeshore setback. Walsh noted the applicants did not request a structural coverage variance so the City Council cannot grant a variance. Gustafson noted the square footage of this house is actually smaller than what was originally approved even though the structural coverage number is higher. Dankey moved, Crosby seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO., a Resolution Amending Resolution No. 6613 Regarding Variances Granted for Property Located at 1700 Bohn's Point Road, File No. 16-3814. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *9. #17-3901 MIKE DEMENGE, 4380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO., a Resolution Approving Variances from Municipal Code 58-47 and Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395, for the property located at 4380 Sixth Avenue North, File No. 17-3901. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 10. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Barnhart stated the Development Process Review committee has met twice since the beginning of the year. This committee is comprised of builders, users of City services, staff, and two Council Members. The goal of the committee is to review the City's processes to see whether any improvements can be made. Some of the recommended changes can be implemented immediately and some changes will require an amendment to the City Code. Most of the changes to City Code require a review by the Planning Commission and a public hearing. The Committee is recommending the following: Removal of the escrow agreement for projects that do not include a new building or an addition to a building. The escrow agreement basically guarantees that the builder is going to pay their bills as part of their permit. Staff does not suggest removing the protection between buyers and sellers found in Section 58-77. 2. Removal of the requirement for an escrow deposit. Staff does not recommend this change since this is an effective tool in completing and maintaining erosion control issues and providing the as - built surveys and other documentation, as well as payment of pass-through engineering and legal fees, to the benefit of the general taxpayer. Modification to what is required in surveys or, at a minimum, when surveys are required. To meet the Committee goals, Staff recommends amendment to Section 86-68 which stipulates when a survey or site plan must be completed by a person registered by the state of Minnesota. Page 16 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) 4. The Committee further recommends the City's wetland management rules align with the Watershed District's. One of the main differences is the City requires an additional setback from the Watershed's buffer. This additional setback is intended to allow people to walk in the area between the house and the wetland buffer area without impacting the buffer. This will require a modification to the wetlands protection ordinance. 5. The committee also recommends modification of where and when a wetland delineation is required to be more consistent with the Watershed District. With authorization, this will be handled at the same time as the wetland regulations above. 6. The Committee recommends modification of the permit forms, reducing the length to one page. Most of the length can be attributed to information provided to the applicant, but Staff will work to reduce the length of the document. This does not require council authorization. Barnhart noted in 2016, the City Council adopted an ordinance that allowed Staff to certify a boundary line adjustment but only if both lots meet the lot area requirements of the district. The committee suggested reviewing that ordinance. Walsh stated this is about streamlining the process to make it easier. Barnhart noted the Council will see all of these requests again in the future and that Staff is looking for authorization of Staff resources to look into this further and to take these items to the Planning Commission. Crosby asked for clarification on the lot line issue. Barnhart stated a lot line rearrangement is not a subdivision by state statute since a new lot is not being created. Orono's Code currently reads that if both lots meet the minimum lot size requirements and lot frontage requirements, then Staff can certify that. Staff is finding, however, that there are quite a number of lots that do not meet the minimum lot requirements so they have to go through the variance process. The committee is suggesting that the language requiring that both lots meet the lot area requirements. Seals asked if this will be helpful to Staff to clean some of this up. Barnhart stated regardless of the community, every ordinance was established to correct or respond to a problem, and Orono is no different. Orono has requirements for surveys, wetland delineations, and buffers that the City has. Barnhart stated what this review is doing is pulling some of those regulations back, but at the same time, by pulling those regulations back, the City might be opening themselves up to those same issues that originally cause the language to be drafted. Walsh stated the philosophical issue is whether the City is guiding their code for the 5 percent who do not do things correctly or the 95 percent who are doing it correctly. Walsh stated he would prefer to guide the City's code to the 95 percent and that he would rather deal with the five percent differently. Walsh stated the objective is to make it easier for people who own small lots, which is something they talked about while campaigning. Page 17 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 10. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) Gaffron stated the City's Code has evolved over the past 60 years and it has resulted in a piling on over the years. Gaffron stated it is good to take a look at it and see where changes can be made without having unexpected impacts. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to refer the recommendations of the Development Process Review Committee to the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11. ONLINE PERMITTING SOFTWARE Barnhart stated one of the main goals of the City Council is to improve service to residents and contracts as part of the building and zoning activities. A well developed software system would be an opportunity to streamline the City's processes and improve communication between the public and City Staff. Staff has solicited information and quotes related to upgrading the City's permitting software to include the following services and features: - Online submittal of permits and land use applications - Online approval of certain permits - Submitted gatekeeping for permits and applications - Permit numbering and land use numbering system - Integrated property ownership records - Customizable reporting - Online status review for applicants Of the three, Staff would recommend Citizen Serve. This system can be expanded to include permitting and tracking of all permits, including Public Works, the dog park, special events, etc. Barnhart stated if the City does shift to an online building permit process, some changes may need to be made to the City's online payment system. Most of these programs do not correspond with PSN, the City's system provider, without additional costs. With Council support, Staff may review the City's needs with its current provider to determine if changes should be made. Barnhart noted this item was not budgeted for this year but that there are funds available in the Equipment Outlay Fund. Ongoing costs would come from a budgeted line item. A portion of the costs could be recouped through surcharges on permits or a convenience charge via online payments. Staff would recommend Citizen Serve since they are a more mature system, is more tailored to the City's needs, and had previously worked out the bugs in their system more completely. Seals asked what would happen if there is a homeowner that is computer illiterate. Barnhart indicated Staff would still accept paper permits but those would need to be entered into the system electronically at some point. Barnhart stated Staff is also looking at having a kiosk available at City Hall that people can use. Seals commented over time she anticipates people will see the value of doing it electronically. Page 18 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 11. ONLINE PERMITTING SOFTWARE (continued) Walsh stated in Orono there are hundreds of permits applied for each year for windows, siding, roofs, etc., and whether it is the builder or the homeowner, the person will no longer need to come to the City to obtain a permit. Walsh stated a number of cities already have a system like this. Seals stated even if the builders were the main users of the system, it still would be an improvement. Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to approve the hiring of Citizen Serve to provide online permitting services. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *12. AUTHORIZATION: TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING CUP REPEAL Printup moved, Seals seconded, to refer this matter to the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Seals reported the Code Committee met and discussed some of the changes that were discussed this evening. Seals stated in her view the changes will help streamline the process and make it easier for the residents. Seals stated she also attended the Planning Commission meeting and that it is amazing the amount of time and thought the Planning Commissioners put into the applications. Seals stated she received lots of phone calls this week from residents and veterans and that all of the phone calls were very pleasant and nice with lots of ideas. Seals stated it is good for people to reach out and that she and Bob Brown had a very solution minded discussion. Seals stated her hope is that people can hear that those are the kind of conversations that drive more solutions and ideas than the more confrontational discussions. Printup welcomed Interim City Administrator Doug Reeder to the City of Orono. Printup thanked everyone who showed up this evening for the Big Island discussion. Printup stated in her view positive things came of it and that he would like to thank Bill Anderson again for his kindness and friendship. Printup noted Bill Anderson was on the Board of Governors for the Veterans Camp and that he provided a good historical perspective. Crosby stated he would like to thank all the veterans that showed up tonight and that he deeply respects their service. Crosby stated he would like to congratulate Dave Benson for being named Man of the Year by the City of Long Lake. Mr. Benson has been a terrific principal for a number of years. Crosby commented that is another feather in Orono School District's cap. Crosby stated he would also like to congratulate the Orono Dance Team, who made it to state competition. Crosby stated the girls did a fabulous job. Crosby stated he would also like to congratulate Mound Westonka and Wayzata for making it to state. Page 19 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued) Dankey commented she has had a very exciting couple of weeks and that she is trying to learn as much as possible. Walsh stated having the discussion tonight showed there is a lot of interest in wanting to remake the island and see what can be done with it. Walsh stated he already has a number of veterans groups that have said they want to be a part of it, which is the important thing that came out of all of this. Walsh stated the only part he was disappointed with was that the newspapers published a lot of stories but they never called the City for their side. Walsh reported he also met with the Communications Committee on the newsletter, which should be coming out shortly. Walsh stated he attended Dennis Libby's 70' birthday and that it was fun to go out there and see all of his veteran friends. Walsh reported they welcomed Girl Scout Troop 19098 to City Hall today and they were given a tour of City Hall and the Police Department. Walsh stated they also had a mock City Council meeting, which was a lot of fun. Walsh stated he would invite any and all interested groups to do the same. Walsh stated he also attended the Lund's grand opening on Saturday with Council Member Crosby. The building looks absolutely fabulous and is now another go -to place for meeting people. Walsh stated they now have indoor seating and dining. Walsh commented it is nice to see companies in Orono beautifying their presence and investing in the community. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Reeder stated he appreciates being brought on board and is looking forward to working with the City Council. 13. 4th QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT Olson noted this is not a final report and that the auditors will be completing their final work later in March. As a result, there could be some minor changes. Current projects have revenues at 104.62 percent of budget and expenditures at 96.43 percent of budget. In net dollars, revenues are projected to exceed expenditures by $630,000. Olson noted 52 percent of the City's revenue comes from taxes and that the amount of taxes collected in 2016 is at 100.77 percent, which is a result of some interest being paid. In regard to the remainder of the General Fund revenues, licenses and permits were at 103 percent; building permits were actually slightly below budget; and mechanical permits and plumbing permits were well over budget. Other governmental revenue finished the year at 116.8 percent of budget, with a major portion of the overage being due to higher than anticipated Police State Aid. Charges for service came in at 105.6 percent, which is due to the fact that the construction related revenue lines were all over 100 percent of budget. Olson stated the City has experienced some good building activity with a few big subdivisions taking place. Page 20 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. 4t'' QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT (continued) Olson noted 2016 was the second year of a rebound for the golf course and that revenues are now getting close to $200,000. Last year the golf course revenues came in at $188,000, which is a 50 percent increase in two years. Next year Staff will be increasing those revenue lines in the budget. The amount of money the City received in interest is pretty much the same as it has been in the past and will come in close to budget. In 2017, the City will likely see some improvement in that item as the economy improves and the Federal Reserve raises the interest rates. Olson noted the City is very restricted in what they can invest in, such as FDIC bonds, and that the City cannot buy stocks or anything risky. The City is able to purchase AAA municipal bonds. Olson displayed a graph depicting the City's revenues for the past five years. Olson noted the City's revenues have remained fairly consistent through the years. The overall General Fund expenditures are currently at 96.4 percent of budget. Five departments are over their expenditure budgets and will require budget adjustments. At 128.48 percent of budget, the special services department was significantly over budget, but this department is used to account for expenditures that are largely passed through to the parties that received the service. Olson noted the legal fees for 2016 were higher than normal because the City had to use a conflict prosecutor more often than usual. The City also had to pay $6,000 in jail charges to Hennepin County. The park budget was $1,720 over budget for the year and was in the maintenance area. All other departments were either at or below budgeted amounts. As it relates to the City's investments, the City earned 2.44 percent on the bonds, which is one of the better bond rates the City has had over the last several years. Money market and operating is slightly higher due to some debt service that came due in February. The City probably has close to $2 million in money markets at the current time. Total investments are $20,181,147 versus $20,068,259 at the end of 2015. Interest earnings in 2016 went up by approximately $14,000 Walsh stated it is not like the City has $20,000,000 but it is funds collected for specific purposes. Olson stated that is correct and that approximately $4 million is in the City's Enterprise Fund and is needed to fund infrastructure going forward. The state auditor recommends a 50 percent fund balance, which means the City should have close to $4 million in reserves. Olson noted the City does have money on hand but that they will not receive another tax payment until June. Olson stated one other benefit of a good fund balance is the Aaa rating the City receives. Orono is one of only 17 cities in the country that has an Aaa rating, and one of the reasons the City receives a strong bond rating is the City's strong financial reserves. Olson stated they would not want the fund balance to decrease too much. Olson stated another requirement of the Fund Balance Policy is that the Council be informed of the City's new investments. Olson stated as the City's investments were going up, they had fewer bonds called and only had three new investments during the quarter. The Federal Home Loan Step Up is at 2.44 percent, which is the best that has been seen for quite some time. Page 21 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 13. 4t'' QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT (continued) Olson stated Council Member Printup requested some information on vendor payments. During 2016, 711 different vendors are paid, with some of those being election judges. Overall the City paid out $9.7 million. The top 20 vendors consisted of 69 percent of all the expenditures or $6.665 million. Olson displayed a listing of the top 20 vendors and noted the $900,000 was actually security on a development. The developer wanted to provide the City with cash instead of obtaining a letter of credit. Seals asked what the Bond Trust and US Bank Wire are. Olson stated the Bond Trust Services Corp. would be the 2014 bonds, which were water, police, garage, and a refunding of the Big Island bonds. Olson stated he cannot recall what the 2010 bonds were for but that he can email that information to the Council. Olson stated he will also email the vendor information to the Council. Reeder asked what the City's budget surplus was in 2016. Olson stated it was approximately $650,000. Walsh stated the City is going to be able to complete some road improvements this year with that money and that they will be in a good position for 2018. The City Council took no formal action on this item. *14. INTERIM CITY ADMINISTRATOR EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT Printup moved, Seals seconded, to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Interim City Administrator Employment Agreement. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *15. LICENSES/PERMITS None *16. CLAIMS/BILLS Printup moved, Seals seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Mattick stated he had nothing to report. Page 22 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 27, 2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. ADJOURNMENT Printup moved, seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 9:58 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 23 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL & PARK COMMISSION JOINT WORK SESSION Monday, February 27, 2017 5:00 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard Crosby II, Wendy Dankey, Aaron Printup, and Victoria Seals; Park Commission Members Rick Meyers, Jan Berg, Brenda Johnson, Bryce Johnson, Julie Ruegemer, and Paul Pesek. Representing Staff were Interim City Administrator Doug Reeder, Public Works Director/Engineer Adam Edwards, and City Clerk Anna Carlson. Mayor Walsh called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. 1. Park Commission — Council Annual Joint Session (Spm) a. 2017 Priorities Park Commission Chair Rick Meyers explained to the Council that the Commission sets priorities each year for Parks in Orono. The focus of the system is to select parks, identify priorities needed, and make plans for each to improve their quality. Meyers explained that Saga Hills is one of the Commission's priority parks. They have developed signage for the park which is intended to be displayed as an informational piece to present the historical value of the park along with other interesting information and images for its visitors. The intent with the signage is that it could eventually be presented at each park in the future. By consensus eventually signs for parks should be put together to be displayed and also put in pamphlet form. There was discussion among the Parks Commission and City Council regarding the importance of improving the quality of all parks to get people to use them. There was some concern expressed regarding the vandalism that has occurred in area parks and also regarding the accessibility of the parks as well. Meyers mentioned that by getting people to use the parks will slow down vandalism. Mayor Walsh mentioned that people should be notified of plans to discuss the park in their neighborhood when possible. Edwards provided background on the priorities list that was developed for Orono parks at the beginning of the year by the Park Commission. The Park Commission will focus on one park at a time until all parks are addressed. There was discussion about advertising the parks in the City Newsletter. Showcasing featured parks and acknowledging people for their donations and contributions could also be done through the Newsletter. b. Park Commission Oversite of Parks Discussion (i) Big Island There was discussion of making a Big Island Committee made up of City Council members, Parks Commissioners, Planning Commissioners, and the public to discuss recommendations for actions and ideas to be considered for Big Island. A Big Island Committee could gather general input and get people involved. (ii) Golf Course Mayor Walsh mentioned that the Golf Course should be made more visitor friendly and be used more than as an annual use. The meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. ATTEST Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Fox Street Rehabilitation- Approval to Solicit Bids Presenter: Adam Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to update the Council on the design, presented by Bolton and Menk, for Fox Street and authorize the solicitation of bids for the project. 2. Background. On August 8, 2016 Bolton & Menk presented a feasibility study for the reconstruction of Fox Street. The study consists of an analysis of the existing conditions, topographic surveying of the project area and development of courses of action to repair, replace and improve the street. On September 12, 2016 the Council approved the engineering and design for sections between Old Crystal Bay Rd. and Brown Road. 3. Scope of Work. The project will consist of the reclamation of the bituminous pavement, select subgrade corrections, and the replacement/improvement of the associated stormwater system between Old Crystal Bay Rd. and Brown Road. 4. Cost. The estimated cost for the project is $ 1,150,643. 5. Funding. The section from Willow Drive to Brown Road is eligible for municipal state aid (MSA) funds. The section from Old Crystal Bay Rd. to Willow Drive will be funded from the Pavement fund and Stormwater fund. Fund Total CIP Amount Est. Fund Balance EOY 2017 MSA construction $ 489,982 $ 643,545 $ 585,968 Pavement Fund $617,604 $ 735,413 $ 137,596 * Storm Water Fund $43,057 $ 60,000 $ 1,453,394 Total $ 1,150,643 * Balance based on Fox Street only 6. Timing. Normally we attempt to schedule larger road projects during the school break period (Jun - Sep) by establishing a substantially complete date of September lst. One resident has requested that this project be completed earlier. The council could direct a substantially complete date of August Pt if so desired. Advertise for Bids..................................................................................................March, 2017 OpenBids/Award....................................................................................................April, 2017 Construction.................................................................................. Summer 2017 7. Staff Recommendation. I recommend the council approve the plans and authorize staff to solicit bids. Further the council should decide if and earlier finish date should be added to the contract. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to authorize the solicitation of Bids for the project and establish a substantially complete date for the project of either August 4th or September 1st Exhibits A. Design Excerpt (Complete Design packet available upon request) Prepared By: Reviewed By: i1 References A. Fox Street Feasibility Study, August 13, 2016 Approved By: DDR DATE STATE PROD. NO. S.A.P. 152-105-002 FROM 10+00.00 TO 34+53.78 GROSS LENGTH 2453.78 FEET 0.465 MILES BRIDGES -LENGTH FEET MILES EXCEPTIONS -LENGTH FEET MILES NET LENGTH 2453.78 FEET 0.465 MILES CITY PROJECT FROM 100+67.34 TO 129+28.81 GROSS LENGTH 2861.47 FEET 0.542 MILES BRIDGES -LENGTH FEET MILES EXCEPTIONS -LENGTH FEET MILES NET LENGTH 2861.47 FEET 0.542 MILES NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." INDEX MAP 01'800, ADT (Current Year) (2017)= 1820 0' 100' GENERAL LAYOUT 1 1 PLAN 0 20 NO. OF TRAFFIC LANES = OL HORR. 2D PROFILE STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS 1.06 EARTHWORK SUMMARY & TABULATIONS VERT. S' © Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved 1.10 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828T L.dwg 2/21/20171:34 PM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF O RO N O, MINNESOTA FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT RECONDITIONING, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CULVERTS S.A.P. 152-105-002 LOCATED ON FOX STREET FROM WILLOW DRIVE S TO BROWN ROAD S CITY PROJECT LOCATED ON FOX STREET FROM S OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD TO WILLOW DRIVE S DESIGN DESIGNATION ESALS (20) = 239,000 ADT (Current Year) (2017)= 1820 ADT (Future Year) (2037)= 2180 T (Heavy Commercial) = 3.6 SHOULDER WIDTH (FT.) = 1 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION = LOCAL NO. OF TRAFFIC LANES = 2 NO. OF PARKING LANES = 0 Ton Design 9 TON R VALUE 12 Design Speed 35 MPH Based on Stopping Sight Distance Height of eye 3.5' Height of object 2.0' Design Speed not achieved at: N/A CTPROJECT LOCATION COUNTY : HENNEPIN DISTRICT: METRO PROJECT DATUM: HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATES HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (1986 ADJ) SHEET DESCRIPTION VERTICAL: NAVD 88 SECTION 1: GENERAL 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 1.01 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA55318 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT MENK -118 Email:Chaska@bolton-men k.com& www.bolton-menk.com S.A.P. NO. 152-105-002 STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS MINN. PROD. NO. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFICATIONS AND THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. SECTION 1: GENERAL TITLE SHEET 1.01 LEGEND 1.02 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT 1.03 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1.04 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.05 STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS 1.06 EARTHWORK SUMMARY & TABULATIONS 1.07 QUANTITY TABULATIONS 1.08-1.09 TYPICAL SECTIONS 1.10 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1.11-1.12 SECTION 2: RIGHT OF WAY & ALIGNMENT PLANS ALIGNMENT TABULATIONS 2.01 SECTION 3: STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL TABULATIONS & NARRATIVE 3.01 STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 3.02 SECTION 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLANS EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN 4.01-4.05 SECTION 5: CONSTRUCTION PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLAN & PROFILE 5.01-5.10 SECTION 6: CULVERT PLANS CULVERT TABULATIONS 6.01 CULVERT PLAN 6.02-6.04 SECTION 7: EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS SWPPP PROJECT INFORMATION & LOCATION 7.01 SWPPP SITE & SOILS MAP 7.02 SWPPP NARRATIVE 7.03 EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN 7.04-7.08 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL 7.09-7.14 (THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 49 SHEETS) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: DAVID P. MARTINI LICENSE # 26122 DATE: 02/21/2017 SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 CITY OF ORONO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 HENNEPIN COUNTY: DIRECTOR, TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT & COUNTY ENGINEER RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 DISTRICT STATE AID ENGINEER REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AID RULES RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 STATE AID ENGINEER APPROVED FOR STATE AID FUNDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FINAL FIELD REVISIONS, IF ANY, OF THIS PLAN WERE MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LIC. NO. DATE: SHEET NO. 1.01 OF 49 z O LL Z'-6 0\3, <G> 4.02 5.04 xx <3> FOX STREE T ux +( --- ------- J 7 - h Lu < 0 L/) Lu cr 0 �-� ,12S"6, 12 0 6�'126+00 'S z 0 w 4.03 EEI < 7.06 EEI <0> 7.08 <G> <3> uj > FOX STREET Ln -tn7� '�7 hnZ 9 -- 2 + 0 0 7 U7 0 ------------- +19 ---- -- ---- <0 71, WEBER 040 Ff LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN CONSTRUCTION PLAN 6.XX CULVERT PLAN < > GEROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN 0 HORZ. 100 200 0 BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 P1one:'9S2),t18-8818 REV I—EDI.A W' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY SUPERVISION ANDTFIAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPE=EER UNDERTHEUMOFTHESTATEOFMINNUOTA. OPAWN AKM SmA.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 1.03 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA I Right Reserved SCALE FEET & MENK Email: Chaska@bolton-menk com —..bolto—enkxom DAVID P. MARTINI 26122 02/21/201 7 DPM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 49 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT :,.RN.,C=2R D'�Al 2/21/2017 1259 PM ,D\110828GPL.d.g UC. NO. —E — YPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) YPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 3GREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) EXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE 5 (3733) _.RADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) INSET A: NOT TO SCALE VARIES (TYP) VARIES (TYP) MATCH EXISTING. 11' THRU LANE 11' THRU LANE V MIN. BLVD AT 2% SEE PLANS FOR 3.0" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) jUT M AREAS WITH CURB B612 OR 81012 gym) 0 CONCRETE CURB w pl 22. 0 (SEE PLANS) 31�PX 0 O 10+00 - 34+54 VARIES VARIES z o \ NOT TO SCALE W �mI NOT TO SCALE T \\M qX Z U 2 INSET A I p" u FOX STREET D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj\ SHEET TYPICAL SECTION 1 nn, c7 9']n, 70 01 V GRAVELSHOULDER v22' MPX-�1\ 31 2 NOT TO SCALE I pU 3.0" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) jUT M FOX STREET gym) 0 LDM I - w pl 22. 0 1O SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. I PLAN VIEW VARIES (TYP) rL VARIES (TYP) V GRAVEL SHOULDER 11' THRU LANE 11' THRU LANE 01 1 ES 1' (MIN.) GRAVEL SHOULDER 3'I J n 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) / MPX-�1\ 31 2 1' INSET A \, 3.0" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) FOX STREET 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE 5 (3733) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE 5 (3733) INSET A FOX STREET WITH GUARDRAIL TYPICAL SECTION 1O SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 10+00 - 34+54 INSET A: NOT TO SCALE \ NOT TO SCALE W �mI NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Z U zz' I p" u IHEREBYCE0.TIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 00. UNDERMYDIREC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNOER THELRVAOFTHE STATEOFMINNESOTA. D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj\ SHEET I I V GRAVELSHOULDER I CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON I I V GRAVELSHOULDER 1,10 NOTE: DETAILS ARE NOT TO SCALE ISI 8c M E N K I I IWm DE O 22' -0 I ® Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved g I PLAN VIEW I DPM TYPICAL SECTIONS 49 VARIES (TYP) (L VARIES (TYP) 11' THRU LANE 11' THRU LANE 1' BLVD 7 EXISTING BITUMINOUS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD EXISTING SECTION NOT TO SCALE )" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) )" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) )" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) -6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) 'PROVED SUBGRADE OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PROPOSED SECTION NOT TO SCALE E SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) (SPWEA240B) (2360) MEGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) ;ADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY NOT TO SCALE 3REGATE BASE CL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) ;ADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY SURFACING NOT TO SCALE �2.0 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) 3.0" TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) MPX-�1\ 31 2 2 HF �r25TjN G 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) NOTES: GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE 5 (3733) INSET A FOX STREET WITH GUARDRAIL \ 1O SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) \ INSET A: TYPICAL SECTION \ 2OTOPSOIL&HYDROSEED.(SEESECTION7FOR RESTORATION) NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 0 GUARDRAIL 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REV DFO DATE IHEREBYCE0.TIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 00. UNDERMYDIREC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNOER THELRVAOFTHE STATEOFMINNESOTA. D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj\ SHEET CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 1,10 NOTE: DETAILS ARE NOT TO SCALE ISI 8c M E N K : Chask @bolton-8838 Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com AKM HIECRED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS cDPM DE DAVID D P. MARTINI ® Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved g --bolton-menk.com 26122 D2�21�2D17 DPM TYPICAL SECTIONS 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828TYP.dwg 2/21/20171:17 PM DATE anoi3a DETOUR DETOUR r dnO130 M DETOUR I" Q Z J STAGE 1: 0 Q WORK AT FOX STREET. N ACCESS ALONG WILLOW DRIVE S WILL REMAIN OPEN TO m THRU TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. ofU � W STAGE 2: O WORK AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE. N THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE IS PERMITTED TO BE CLOSED FOR ONE DAY DURING WORKING HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SUBCUTTING, CULVERT INSTALLATION, AND PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE THROUGH THE INTERSECTION. ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON J WILLOW DRIVE AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING THE J INTERSECTION FOR DAYTIME WORK. o c � _ c nnj �njp w t �o o~ 1►�l�►nll►n�l 1 v c o m i x m m c Z moa s wt o �L T X O LL FOX STREET x m5a N m; os€o_ �T we LL �� w —DETOUR FOX ST o o o EgER H I L LS EA$T AHEAD Q Q O ROiq HAD DETOUR O FOX ST Fox ST — �'.. EAST .J WEST I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY Mf O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 26385HADOW LANE, SUITE 200 DFD DniE UNDEP MYDIRE SUPERVISION AND HATIAMA DULY LICENSED PROFEBSIONALENGINEER D�JW UNDER THE— OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 3.02 0 300 600 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 1111 DRAWN AKM HOR2. Plone& M E N K :Chalk @bolton-8838 AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com SCALE FEET DAVID P. MARTINI OIECRED 49 11011,11R.'C enk 2Nn C017,AllRightsReserved www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828STG.dwg 2/21/201]1:30 PM DATE LEGEND ® PROJECT AREA _ DETOUR ROUTE I Q Z J STAGE 1: 0 Q WORK AT FOX STREET. N ACCESS ALONG WILLOW DRIVE S WILL REMAIN OPEN TO m THRU TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. ofU � W STAGE 2: O WORK AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE. N THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE IS PERMITTED TO BE CLOSED FOR ONE DAY DURING WORKING HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SUBCUTTING, CULVERT INSTALLATION, AND PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE THROUGH THE INTERSECTION. ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON J WILLOW DRIVE AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING THE J INTERSECTION FOR DAYTIME WORK. o c � _ c nnj �njp w t �o o~ 1►�l�►nll►n�l 1 v c o m i x m m c Z moa s wt o �L T X O LL FOX STREET x m5a N m; os€o_ �T we LL �� w —DETOUR FOX ST o o o EgER H I L LS EA$T AHEAD Q Q O ROiq HAD DETOUR O FOX ST Fox ST — �'.. EAST .J WEST I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY Mf O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 26385HADOW LANE, SUITE 200 DFD DniE UNDEP MYDIRE SUPERVISION AND HATIAMA DULY LICENSED PROFEBSIONALENGINEER D�JW UNDER THE— OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 3.02 0 300 600 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 1111 DRAWN AKM HOR2. Plone& M E N K :Chalk @bolton-8838 AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com SCALE FEET DAVID P. MARTINI OIECRED 49 11011,11R.'C enk 2Nn C017,AllRightsReserved www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828STG.dwg 2/21/201]1:30 PM DATE AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 0411723420004 0411723420005 LM & DE STUBBS PID: 0411723430011 0 E DRESSEL ET AL Minnetonka Alano Group Inc. 2740 Fox St. 2720 Fax St 2760 Fox St. Zzi O LOT 24 LOT 23 LOT 22 U EM I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) FOX &, OLD CRYSTAL SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP)r BAY ROAI NUI LARGE ROCK WIR F C - 20== B E ENCE / STOP -963-- d =o BITUMINOUS ` X X XX A50 i SII ,950 q w o ` GRAYEC- 96 /9601 6 , 8 -WIRE FEN 96 3 X 6J X 6e / Lt , 2 u 1 \ X X X l Bn BEGIN CITY PROJECT t �� '- - -- - - - STA 100+67.34 - - - - - - 96u X I 0B-1 T - - - - - — — - - - _ - - - - -- - 100+00 101100J I / 104+Ob _ 105+00 - 0 00 102+60 - - N CENTS FOX ST NTURY LINITG _ __ Q / cucu c Du c�G '_"''u ,�, / - - --®_e' _ -__ - rf�r` 4------ OUOU�. OU r'Ti r' Tir-2~�i„�.`� / . f.("i'}� '3`N_MPH _ _ RA L 1 2" g5 - —�^ rF�^ ,966' HOUSE 9ADDi2E5��9 Ery N a 96 Q PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) m 95 - J sroP REMOVAL LEGEND Q REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OA REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTALTO PIPE REMOVAL) - N ® z3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © REMOVE BOLLARDS o U w U OO ® REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN N I X REMOVE TREE O REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER QJ SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) /IA/IAAAA/I/IA/IA/I REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) Co ca — — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0411723420003 woo M.JACOBSON Iz z o 2690 Fox St. o g g Z z_ LOT 21 LOT 20 U z w O WATER FLOWING Z in = DO FAST AT TIME OF H a INVENTORY d a w I II m REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE r =ssz6z 25.00 RBsnsID,aB, CONSTRUCTION _ Oa NU(I2")aRas.7s _ B -WIRE FENCE __c ROCK NN (21") 949 52 _ __ w J LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE fl --- _ - - _ _ _ _ 956_ - __ - --------- -LARGE B OLDER WALL (MULCH) )_ 9>L 51'' -- _-- __-_-\ \ _ -_J G MULCH .9 ����� 955 95d /Aye v 9501 / A Br'fUMINOUS _______ 6" - - s - - - _____"___________ 9E ` , , - 2-__ _ 5 _____ --__ SJ --_ 9 95 __ _ _ ' 955 --------- _ 9ry 9N ,9d m. , , _ - X -- t_ - r'T r} _ D J 107+0 - T- -- - 0 B-31 3 y V DB+ - ���g}�(j - - - 0"+f1D- -- ' - X ST CENTERPOINT- 9 ------ ___ U�t^= - - OTIJRI' It= - __- _- G - U',— _9 <- 53 _ ,-£"�(-'.'` `, - __- -- --- -,F^"`i-,">'� st, T r -t, - E G 9 lgaP o `_ 95 _ ,•-("�,y ?7F' ___ _ A/ yo 9 LARGE ROCK �9 :'949e gb8 / /f)1' _ _-941____ a h9 _ a° m s BITUMINOUS GENERAL NOTES: nab' % S----eas / • / WETLAND __ _ ' 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM WETLAND Q 0 THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE / z Q VERIFIED BYTHE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. / 0 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL <--------------------------- - ---- -----Z `t TO COMMON EXCAVATION. _ _ _ _ _ I UrWETLAND U N z 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED - - - - -�—I - - - - - - - _ - _ _ < O INCIDENTAL. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN F a 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT a w INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE ^ IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 0411723430020 PID: 0411723430003 J & W TUCKER D. TERRY THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL�� 650 Gander Rd. 2765 Fox St. D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE v' GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." Q REV ORD OniE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI5 PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER jj 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNDER THE IAW50FTHE STATE OFMINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4,01 HOR2. Phone& M E N K :Chalk @bolt48-men AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com C Bolt on& Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET—bolton-meak.com DAVID P. MARTINI HECK 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM 26122 DATE 02(21/2017 cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN h h f - D Cu -CO - 94Z____ - /' __\WATCH FOR CHILDREN , 3 QUEST @ Ril / 9u_ E v D= A 1` 5 E 8 6" 6" __ catvosc�PE 0 coNc rI- .9 / WETLAND ' � 3 _ - 1 ----- p1- ^/ [} GRAVEL \, - a1 7ECE-CLOCK i"�- - Y 4 p E Jj 1 q � n 1yl / 6 y.,� �6� �ivER RocX) � � Ary � %'� f2 " -936'' II ^' I �h LA CA - a3 Lw �g4QD '7 c ------ ---' X 2 g\ T O POLE "?-�{- III A (RIVE�2�oc��` 6' Z,' 10 10 / 10 X 5 P u 2., PROTECT POWER E L` ------II } / \ *6" 0' p p n� ` yyyy4" LANDSCAPE 7' WETLAND (RIVER ROCK) REMOVAL LEGEND PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE -------------T w I z 3 ---- ------ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OA REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) 0 x w m w - REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © REMOVE BOLLARDS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ < a w ® REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE O REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 30 I d. SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) III/I/I/I/I/1/1/1/1/I/I/III REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 0411723410005 I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 24 o FOX ST. I I I I I I D m II I c I ? ? O II I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) < SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) - _ ------- WETLAND J _ ________________„ -_-„_ - _---__-_ SPLIT RAIL FENCE _ -` _ _ _ 9 _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ 's4c____________________ - _ --. __--________ CHILDq�y'� - �sA _ - sz__ - --_ - _--_______ __-_ _ _ - --- \ ��rR--_----9 - _ 6, ___g4!-_ ------------------ ------------------------------- 9K __ s. �_y>C.}2.` �7 �R0�5)PE� _ y� '�`,. --- __- ----940 ____________________________________________________ 942__94_._-4o- - _ 't.J \ 4, , "`_ _+ -�J s s, WATE X36 _ _ _ __ ____ __ __-------- --------------__ __ �9 _ _--__�.� -936 - 3\ -��\'Q \�\` _4� T..B}-�. 9v�.9J8� _-- -� �-.q _4> _ 93E `_= 6,.�`-' 'K _ -�� � _� ''~s'- _ 123 -------- Ou- 9,, D� _ -95 ON --- - -oa € k --- n D ? Tn PCZ °O e eeND qH�o-- 0 _ ___ 934_ __--------------------------- - ----_ -- -- _ _ _____ _-__ ___ ____ ____ _932____ - - -� , i _ _ ' , --- LAND _____�-_ -___ ,-.� Y' ___r^_._� _____�� �!____ _____ ____ _ _______ ______ ___ ___ ---_ - _ xV(�hrt r�t'c 9�i rt ri --t �- rt .-�*'-s �` 93 ___ ___\ 1 WET _ 934 �i1� -- -------- .15 _"-- ` ' % LANDSCAPE I _�- 9 � FLAT STONE WALL, � ---' ' *-12” �� a' � 93) � WETLAND iZ WOOD POSTS -----___ _ �- -' -_ FANCY MAILBOXOu 10"t0" -----__-"--- PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) w/ II �aND _1 s3s - - - - - - • NE� PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE GENERAL NOTES: - - - - 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM _ _ +— - - - - THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. W o D m - 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL ? v D _ _ - _ - o411723440002 TO COMMON EXCAVATION. v = r J & S GRUDNOWSKI O 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED Q Lu Z m / 2555 Fox St. INCIDENTAL. I H / 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. I ISSUEDFD -EHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI5 PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIREC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNDERTI-11-01THESTATEOFMINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4,02 HOR2. D& M E N K :ChalPlonek @bolt48-men AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET -bolton-menk.com DAVID P. MARTINI HECK 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM 26122 DATE ozizl/zov cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVAL PLAN 1 NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN N. LINE, SE 1 /4 OF THE SE 1/4 a I PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT U > j LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE Q w LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0007.OT 2 Li US o o THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL 04117234100 = Z z w D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE LOCK "STANDARD J. JOHNSON 2530 FOX ST. z 3 O 00 D GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED GUIDELINES FOR T 1 COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." v w O � I w CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) LL a a SALVAGE & REINSTALL BOULDER WALL z5.. J-----� --- - 4r-"'`-- _,' 3„ L -� - WATER 'II I I I 111' --- 8------- BOULDER WALL y1Mlli1011 S_ 940 � -------------_------- ---------------- 011, � ---------------- ----------- --- -- y -- -- ------------------ _ ` - -- __- _ 1 `` `` -_-_ 28j 20" 22" � — -� � �� Ij 11' ------------9 _ ; - 4ry�L _Zee ENOS9aZ"_ _ \3�'=. A s _-_____ ________ - 22" 24" 24" - - I R ROULDE\N h h f - D Cu -CO - 94Z____ - /' __\WATCH FOR CHILDREN , 3 QUEST @ Ril / 9u_ E v D= A 1` 5 E 8 6" 6" __ catvosc�PE 0 coNc rI- .9 / WETLAND ' � 3 _ - 1 ----- p1- ^/ [} GRAVEL \, - a1 7ECE-CLOCK i"�- - Y 4 p E Jj 1 q � n 1yl / 6 y.,� �6� �ivER RocX) � � Ary � %'� f2 " -936'' II ^' I �h LA CA - a3 Lw �g4QD '7 c ------ ---' X 2 g\ T O POLE "?-�{- III A (RIVE�2�oc��` 6' Z,' 10 10 / 10 X 5 P u 2., PROTECT POWER E L` ------II } / \ *6" 0' p p n� ` yyyy4" LANDSCAPE 7' WETLAND (RIVER ROCK) REMOVAL LEGEND PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE -------------T w I z 3 ---- ------ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OA REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) 0 x w m w - REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © REMOVE BOLLARDS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ < a w ® REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE O REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 30 I d. SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) III/I/I/I/I/1/1/1/1/I/I/III REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 0411723410005 I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 24 o FOX ST. I I I I I I D m II I c I ? ? O II I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) < SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) - _ ------- WETLAND J _ ________________„ -_-„_ - _---__-_ SPLIT RAIL FENCE _ -` _ _ _ 9 _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ 's4c____________________ - _ --. __--________ CHILDq�y'� - �sA _ - sz__ - --_ - _--_______ __-_ _ _ - --- \ ��rR--_----9 - _ 6, ___g4!-_ ------------------ ------------------------------- 9K __ s. �_y>C.}2.` �7 �R0�5)PE� _ y� '�`,. --- __- ----940 ____________________________________________________ 942__94_._-4o- - _ 't.J \ 4, , "`_ _+ -�J s s, WATE X36 _ _ _ __ ____ __ __-------- --------------__ __ �9 _ _--__�.� -936 - 3\ -��\'Q \�\` _4� T..B}-�. 9v�.9J8� _-- -� �-.q _4> _ 93E `_= 6,.�`-' 'K _ -�� � _� ''~s'- _ 123 -------- Ou- 9,, D� _ -95 ON --- - -oa € k --- n D ? Tn PCZ °O e eeND qH�o-- 0 _ ___ 934_ __--------------------------- - ----_ -- -- _ _ _____ _-__ ___ ____ ____ _932____ - - -� , i _ _ ' , --- LAND _____�-_ -___ ,-.� Y' ___r^_._� _____�� �!____ _____ ____ _ _______ ______ ___ ___ ---_ - _ xV(�hrt r�t'c 9�i rt ri --t �- rt .-�*'-s �` 93 ___ ___\ 1 WET _ 934 �i1� -- -------- .15 _"-- ` ' % LANDSCAPE I _�- 9 � FLAT STONE WALL, � ---' ' *-12” �� a' � 93) � WETLAND iZ WOOD POSTS -----___ _ �- -' -_ FANCY MAILBOXOu 10"t0" -----__-"--- PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) w/ II �aND _1 s3s - - - - - - • NE� PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE GENERAL NOTES: - - - - 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM _ _ +— - - - - THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. W o D m - 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL ? v D _ _ - _ - o411723440002 TO COMMON EXCAVATION. v = r J & S GRUDNOWSKI O 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED Q Lu Z m / 2555 Fox St. INCIDENTAL. I H / 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. I ISSUEDFD -EHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI5 PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIREC SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNDERTI-11-01THESTATEOFMINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4,02 HOR2. D& M E N K :ChalPlonek @bolt48-men AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET -bolton-menk.com DAVID P. MARTINI HECK 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM 26122 DATE ozizl/zov cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVAL PLAN ---------- Lu ------- 0 /A 1/ LINK - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEGIN S.A.P. i52-105-002 - - - - - - - - STA 110+00.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - -----952- -RAP 1 - - - - - - - - -------- - - - --- ---- ------------ - - - - - - - - - A-------- - ----------- oow 14" CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 17-9 B ----- --------- -1�1 ----------- ---- -- Alp,� 4494 ------------ -- ----- 9 ----------------- - ----- --- 0, 4 Do N 0"0 4" s, A 'osls--- --- o - �-U ;194 --94az — D 24' _J ---- --------------- -------- 7 8- END CITY PROJECT -- ---- STA 129+28.81 �2 64�60 -7� L 7x344000I,c "o L OT 0RQN0\ s._1`_ -_` 7 REMOVAL LEGEND fhc1 7 ------------ ------------ -REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) ----------- ------ I-5 - --------------------- --- --- ----93a --- REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (D REMOVE BOLLARDS REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (D SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE (D REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I BEGIN S.A.P. 152-105-002 STA 10+00.00 - - - - - - - - - SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - _—__\q_____ - - - PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) - - - - - - - - -------------------------------- S - - - - - - - - P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- L------_ ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEN, /INK % w 6 - - - ------ - - - - - - - - - - v v1t 17) z G 95 vv U _--= -917 --------- c �t� ------- �c RIV, ---------- 3+00 ------------- -------- ------- 14+00 ----- --- -- 7!-4 L+60 w 57 ------ FOX ST 1p - ----- - REET,.----- - ------ TOP B- --------- A Q D C B f - - - --- 1, 1i AD - - _"OU A G Z --' , -r�� -— 711-- 'Dof) posTs lr�l 77 - G, - -------- -- ----- AVF1 948 ou -- --- ---- ---- %4�."961--9 ---- je� VVD I WALL -- --------- -J, - ---- --- -------- 947 oD WALL ,uu v ----- -------- LL i7------------------------- u ---- -- - OLI --------------- ---------- cu _/___ - - -------OU GENERAL NOTES: -------------------- ---- --- -- -------- ----------- 950 ---- - ------ 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. END CITY PROJECT TO COMMON EXCAVATION. STA 129+28.81 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN 15 UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL v AIA INCIDENTAL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE 0 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR" THE u INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA. m IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REV I-EDI.A DATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR DE-�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDER MYDIRE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER jJ 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 NUERTRCIVVS FTHESTATEOFMNNFSOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.03 BOLTON P1 ne:,9-12,4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Cohaska@bolton-menk.com --::::] Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved HORZ. & MENK —bolto—eitk.com DAVID P. MARTINI CHECR FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS o --1 DATE P� 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UC. NO. 26122 02/21/2017 D EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN I I I I I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m I I I Z m I I I v x N I II I v I a w SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS iMU96i1�--' Z ________959-- 9b� Qbti/ g60.'jg5 -------- Z-1k --960_--__/'960 9I_- ,962 D _ p_ 6 _ _ X966 _ �____6__ a QUEST �.V_(..>�-_' - -/ ________________________________ C__96� 96263. - - - - - C� G P G FI_L� CU CU Y GL —� -�- CENTERPOINT- -- q�/nn1 r� n -Fn l..a P - ®,�-- X59,-_ �+t�®---- '� ---- ++C7�®,`---- '-_ YL --r"ai 9 5 5 - 'SSI _ ,- 953 954 _ - _ __ ___ _ \\— ___ eU95I952OU -- ---------- --- _`- __"9 _-_------ ____g57 ------ ----- _ _ OU °53 ` = O -94B — — — — — _ — — —950— — -____ _ 950----_-- _--_—� _ _______ REMOVAL LEGEND EX REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OA REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTALTO PIPE REMOVAL) m z a REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT© REMOVE BOLLARDS _ F- a w REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT © SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN 2 V X REMOVE TREE O REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) /VVVI/I/I/I/I/VI/I/III REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS = o u m � w � m 6 i 1 , 1 g6 _\ pI 4* 1 v _------ 962__y� HI OP CU 12* 1_:12" I � 96_963 ----------- --------- 961 --- r 'q6\ 9 ®9 _ ,c s.- �✓>> S - - B-9 19+00 20+00 21+00 22 FOX STREETVIE EBB6R *L{ iidAD � — � � � � � � � � � S AR4'FC — — -- ;�,1 0) LANDSCAPE t LANDSCAPE �%-,-�'�•966---1"7=� __ _ a 9OOK)� _`-("1>y f'c 't'Cr-1 r�-r -------- - 2 -OU OU -,g QUI/ ®E 011— U �l BRICK SIGN COLUMN �ESPLIT RAIL FENCE) N SIGN COLUMN BRICK SIGN COLUMN �I L FENCE GN OLUMN v m Lu OLu v NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TY BLIND INT. AHEAD / ** -----BJ9�,__ _-� y.1 4.1 yam'. `✓ �.J-'._ `` -950- -949` E3 —C- G 25+00 =� i 2Y+00 I 27+00 FOX STREP 4B-10 _ _ _ _ i- _- - s�-71- q>� �0— �n'Y— �g41— _ , I 1 9 ��-- ____ �_� _ 53_ -965- - ____ ___________-_�_ __ ____ ____ ___ _ __ _ __ _ _ ________ _________ __________ - - _ _ _ _ ____ _____ ------------� - ," _ ,\ � F � 94h _ _---- -- _ - - _ 96l___ {�� __ ___ - _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __----------- __ OU _ _ OU -yB� �� •-9s o5>6 �` .\\- \/'tt.^��r{�ti �ht-�i^i ti �ih?'i�}'� ` �r'i��h r'��- ��t��^ic3p�r-��1fa_s3 �<���hr-��_r����"i 7'cl-J^ir OU-�OU _9 g69_' ___ U. 1.� _ btt_��-� OU P� 3 OU-q°moiOU sem___ OU `�TOI{� � � OU-�$ -0 - .,917 >¢ •nj�-�\ , \ �� ,- - - _ - - /Y 1 I PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) CR GENERAL NOTES: Z o _ v 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM r EE z THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE a w = m VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. F a 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL a "' TO COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REVDMEHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 OFD UNDERMYDIRE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER J1\/I/ 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNOERTHEIAWSOFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.04 HOR2. Ilone& M E N K :Chalk @bolt48-men AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com C Bolt on& Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET—bolton-menk.com DAVID P. MARTINI HEaEo 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM 26122 DATE 02/21/2ov cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVAL PLAN ZI 3: zi = O L, H m a w HI LP - - B-9 19+00 20+00 21+00 22 FOX STREETVIE EBB6R *L{ iidAD � — � � � � � � � � � S AR4'FC — — -- ;�,1 0) LANDSCAPE t LANDSCAPE �%-,-�'�•966---1"7=� __ _ a 9OOK)� _`-("1>y f'c 't'Cr-1 r�-r -------- - 2 -OU OU -,g QUI/ ®E 011— U �l BRICK SIGN COLUMN �ESPLIT RAIL FENCE) N SIGN COLUMN BRICK SIGN COLUMN �I L FENCE GN OLUMN v m Lu OLu v NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TY BLIND INT. AHEAD / ** -----BJ9�,__ _-� y.1 4.1 yam'. `✓ �.J-'._ `` -950- -949` E3 —C- G 25+00 =� i 2Y+00 I 27+00 FOX STREP 4B-10 _ _ _ _ i- _- - s�-71- q>� �0— �n'Y— �g41— _ , I 1 9 ��-- ____ �_� _ 53_ -965- - ____ ___________-_�_ __ ____ ____ ___ _ __ _ __ _ _ ________ _________ __________ - - _ _ _ _ ____ _____ ------------� - ," _ ,\ � F � 94h _ _---- -- _ - - _ 96l___ {�� __ ___ - _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __----------- __ OU _ _ OU -yB� �� •-9s o5>6 �` .\\- \/'tt.^��r{�ti �ht-�i^i ti �ih?'i�}'� ` �r'i��h r'��- ��t��^ic3p�r-��1fa_s3 �<���hr-��_r����"i 7'cl-J^ir OU-�OU _9 g69_' ___ U. 1.� _ btt_��-� OU P� 3 OU-q°moiOU sem___ OU `�TOI{� � � OU-�$ -0 - .,917 >¢ •nj�-�\ , \ �� ,- - - _ - - /Y 1 I PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) CR GENERAL NOTES: Z o _ v 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM r EE z THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE a w = m VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. F a 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL a "' TO COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REVDMEHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 OFD UNDERMYDIRE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER J1\/I/ 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNOERTHEIAWSOFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.04 HOR2. Ilone& M E N K :Chalk @bolt48-men AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com C Bolt on& Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET—bolton-menk.com DAVID P. MARTINI HEaEo 49 H:\ORNO\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM 26122 DATE 02/21/2ov cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVAL PLAN —\9�- — — — --- — — — A-_-_____-_ F'--- ____ U -------------- OUB I_ iECT POWER POLE (TYP) —� CAUTION ------in rY-- t---- -Mu,-' -- - _ '}.. 932;-L-}R,cY._ _--_—_ r� -tL—�' 3-=-_ g32--01 _930-.1NEIl9ND_—_—�/�Y / 9 L - / WETLAND i REMOVAL LEGEND o z 0 20 40 HOR2. ®BDlton&menk, I"c.2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET H:\ORNO\C13110826\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT d CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHEIN OFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT u ® REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT DAVID P. MARTINI 26122 DARE 02/21/2017 Z \ � o m u x \ \ a w \ \ , I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) -4� �C S.'_______ T., CE�'IURY INK3`- _ ___ __________________ _________________ _ ____ ____________________________________ _'__i__ )___ __ ---- - B-C�NTERPOINT ________ CU � __30+00 _ 31 FOX STREET a —\9�- — — — --- — — — A-_-_____-_ F'--- ____ U -------------- OUB I_ iECT POWER POLE (TYP) —� CAUTION ------in rY-- t---- -Mu,-' -- - _ '}.. 932;-L-}R,cY._ _--_—_ r� -tL—�' 3-=-_ g32--01 _930-.1NEIl9ND_—_—�/�Y / 9 L - / WETLAND i — — — — --930 U — - X REMOVETREE SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) AiIAiIiIAAAAAA/III REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) — — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS G WET AND �OU DECK 32+00 zl�: () REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) O REMOVE BOLLARDS O SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN (2)REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) I 1 I I 93o- iwE7L�NO _ _WETLAND — — — — — — OU GAS MARKER — _____ 1 ----__------ rS g w i _______________— _------------- --------_930—i 33+00 34+00 `CAUTION EoCRETE 32+00 RID E DECK BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC=935.817 rCAUTL WALL WETLAND — — — — — — 9J0-1gEiLANL —WETLAND— GAS MARKER IIE___________-----------------93a—�� HALL U 930_-------------------- _____________________ _______� _____.. __________ __________________________931____ 3 CENTURY LINK 5 _________________________________ r, Au ____931________ ALL ------------------- _ ___ ____' — +� -- --_—__—_-930_----------- 1-�------___ NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN I PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE ILAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL ^� I D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE / �1 GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." � 1\ Ou Mh a , w 35+19 m BENCHMARK rUA a 1 Mr -C 1 0B-1 caunoN DISK IN CONC=935.817 111TON--------------------- 0B-12 \ 9J; �iZa.------- --- — \ 3.78 — 0 13 ENDSAP 152-105-002 B - � — 93 qv' STA 34+5 9J, CONCRETE wlNc wnl -- J30 — = 1� 90,� SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) WING WALL -- ------------ "� —930--WETI2ND J WETLAND ---- _�� D;�``•� \\� \` �S GAS M KER ---- WETLAND _ WETLAN0.;, N CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: \ I \ Z / 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM / THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. O / 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO COMMON EXCAVATION. w w \1 m 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED z O INCIDENTAL. x m 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED G W INCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. \ REMOVAL LEGEND o z 0 20 40 HOR2. ®BDlton&menk, I"c.2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET H:\ORNO\C13110826\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT d CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHEIN OFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT u ® REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT — — — — --930 U — - X REMOVETREE SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) AiIAiIiIAAAAAA/III REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) — — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS G WET AND �OU DECK 32+00 zl�: () REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) O REMOVE BOLLARDS O SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN (2)REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) I 1 I I 93o- iwE7L�NO _ _WETLAND — — — — — — OU GAS MARKER — _____ 1 ----__------ rS g w i _______________— _------------- --------_930—i 33+00 34+00 `CAUTION EoCRETE 32+00 RID E DECK BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC=935.817 rCAUTL WALL WETLAND — — — — — — 9J0-1gEiLANL —WETLAND— GAS MARKER IIE___________-----------------93a—�� HALL U 930_-------------------- _____________________ _______� _____.. __________ __________________________931____ 3 CENTURY LINK 5 _________________________________ r, Au ____931________ ALL ------------------- _ ___ ____' — +� -- --_—__—_-930_----------- 1-�------___ NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN I PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE ILAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL ^� I D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE / �1 GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." � 1\ Ou Mh a , w 35+19 m BENCHMARK rUA a 1 Mr -C 1 0B-1 caunoN DISK IN CONC=935.817 111TON--------------------- 0B-12 \ 9J; �iZa.------- --- — \ 3.78 — 0 13 ENDSAP 152-105-002 B - � — 93 qv' STA 34+5 9J, CONCRETE wlNc wnl -- J30 — = 1� 90,� SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) WING WALL -- ------------ "� —930--WETI2ND J WETLAND ---- _�� D;�``•� \\� \` �S GAS M KER ---- WETLAND _ WETLAN0.;, N CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: \ I \ Z / 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM / THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. O / 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO COMMON EXCAVATION. w w \1 m 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED z O INCIDENTAL. x m 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED G W INCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. \ I I 0 20 40 HOR2. ®BDlton&menk, I"c.2017, All Rights Reserved SCALE FEET H:\ORNO\C13110826\CAD\C3D\110828REM.dwg 2/21/20171:26 PM BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com & M E N K :Chalk @bolt48-men —bolton-menk.com I—EDI.F—EHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHEIN OFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. S.A.P. 152-105-002 J1\ DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS HE. cDPM EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN SHEET 4.05 OF 49 DAVID P. MARTINI 26122 DARE 02/21/2017 REMOVE PAVEMENT ON OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FROM FOX STREET TO 150' NORTH OF FOX STREET AS MARKED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. PAVEMENT THICKNESS VARIES FROM 6" TO 12", PATCH IN ACCORDANCE AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION WITH THE DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 0411723420004 \ PID: 0411723430011 04E DRE 20005 27 0 o STUDBS t. Minnetonka Alano Group Inc. 0 E DRESSEL ET AL 2720 Fox St. 2740 Fox St. I of - 2760 2760 Fox St. W o P �Z o �o� p—° LOT 23 LOT 22 0 ? w C, Un Z �)T 24 Z Z N (7 m n o w 0 o O o CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA O m o o Q + K N ¢ w �Goo�`U, ��O 8 o o f o Z CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA a (Z~� rn Z K N z o REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO z ¢ z w MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS Z w w 3' BEHIND THE CURB a l7 FOX &, OLD CRYS� w m Q O H W N m a (� --I F Uu to w w O •jg ` H ROAD LyZj to Do ^ CD ^ N m z t,io] N U -LARGE ROCK o w - poo FENCE o '�, *20" w � p 10� � m IR wIR� I i o -STOP o 9`' 0'��y OY 101TUMINous tO• a `r ao x x X EX� O '80 6 II II W 8-WIR NCE- O N X X _l - 1 1 D44i _xBEGIN CITYPROJECT ♦ r o GRAYEt 1 �� \----xSTA 100+67.34 -m 0B -1S10 DD 6p• 101100102 3sA 0b sld 664 °° o OX STREET 105+00, I o 10 00 td0 ., 0� i 103+00 8� a o 104+00 - - C•BO _ iV O- N o2 CENTS 7 .-I pi �\ - � ` x N ' O / • �' All � - _ _ _ - _ = Q -4---- O OU - OUB _ OU ` OU ]^'y --'}.'•L "y G L - �i - L ---------- F 16 x z'` x -51 �y s _ -__- 34" / , 20' CIO m ' - Z Z m Z Z J , sroP ++ p m 0- +- 9 �� 'H3 N 60 Q o -� ? CONSTRUCTION LEGEND w Ui N 33 N w a (D GENERAL NOTES: Z F- Ew } 00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS = L NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. F _ U THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE �► ROAD CROSS SLOPE ¢ w TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, NOTIFY CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY x _ TOP OF FINISHED 0 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GRADE ELEVATION J ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. Q I THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 O THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. H PROTECTTREE CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE OA INSTALL GUARDRAIL OI PROTECT LANDSCAPING DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. .. .. .. .. r © SALVAGE 8L REINSTALL RETAINING WALL OJ 8612 CURB & GUTTER F STREET R © INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN OK 81012 CURB & GUTTER 980 1 �J 1 ` Op PROTECT MAILBOX © PROTECT POWER POLE 980 EO RELOCATE MAILBOX O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) VPI 103+5 .13 O PROTECT DRIVEWAY ECEV 965.8 NO GUTTER OUT CURB &GUTTER URYE.LEN 5.00' GO PROTECT CULVERT Op END TREATMENT- TANGENT TERMINAL :: 975 E=1.zz' : 975 UP� N �^ a': 970 w : oL V 1106+36.53 970 L W. +' Ol M W J CUR E LEN=120. 0' CD m PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE > w E=0.41' --- - -- __ N 965 A, 0� .> 965 0�0� o> o� : �� 4:�aw aw +^ .> 5.9 0 J N w 960 -- 07 ias% Iso D ' EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE L^ 960 .. -T_ .83%:: > 955 _ - 955 950 950 945 945 00 V0 M 00 :: L11 :: 00 : : n .M M U0 1� w al O V 00 N Ln V Ol �. N ry .W N .00 V 4N O 0: n �. .7 oN ti Q n m V m 01 m. Ol . .V ti .L11 N M N H O'O. .Ot �. .n W v Lq m Ill m UO r LO N n O 0. O .. W -i: . .W .. .W N N N M M .� N. N UK ^ '0 w LO .N N a .. M cy 0 .. C) DO I`^ LD Ln N V V 940 m LDS- - - �� - �m - - �� �� �� �N a� - m940 'Ol "Ol 'Ol "Ol "Ol 0Y 'Ol QI a 'Ol T Ql 0Y "Ol Cn 'Ol "M 'Ol M '0) "M 'Ol -OI 'M m M m M m Ot m '01 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 REVHEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 DFO DATE UNDEP MYDIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER J1N UNDERTHELAW50FTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.01 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHAhon MINNESOTA 55318 oRAwN Phone: (952) 448-8838 HOR2. VERT. AKM OF & M E N K Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 91 SCALE FEET SCALE FEET www0.bolton-menk.com DAVID P. MARTINI cxECRED ORO\ Cl3llO Inc20173D\1All 10828 Ll.d.g 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828ALl.dwg 2/21/201] 1:30 PM DATE W 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4rt 229 Q Q m NUMBER w 0411723420003 0411723420001 ZEHNDER HOMES INC. m 06 o o 0 1 M. JACOBSON 03 2660 Fox St. + z 2690 Fox St SALVAGE & REINSTALL LANDSCAPING m cc =) u w REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UPTO w w :S^� oN 5 ' o n LOT 21 z 20 O ? LOT z 2' BEHIND THE CURB 1 = 11 w o 0 w o z z z z w ,n WATER FLOWING Z w Z FAST AT TIME OF Z O z O INVENTORY oo a CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA O m F O u ovl J Do-" 0- +�0 m +� K O O N oz oz u O E w a w O f1 d 1 Nm K N W �Q omo`^ a +z ,�z +z mu +oc +z ¢ `1 CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA m¢ o m r m¢ 0 +z °+cc o r o r .+�� --25.00--I vl o z a Bsz.az ¢ l7 p z .. z o o? r w uw(12')4q 876z v p 13�nn ' -- _--DO c N w _ In m _ 4EBEOVAL HINDTHEITS CURBTEND UP TO m z G w r Z yOq - a 0 r °'I a ll a w Lo n w JJ _ s LARGE ROCK © f O LANDSCAPE �,, r �' m - cH a C7 a ll _ vri_m _ m e -__ -WIRE) FEN E ,i w ; �,`- ------ - - r z I_ - LANDSCAPE -- Obi ,. z - - ' MULCH M (MULCH),, -_ ,_ B ULDER WALL ( ) N II _-- �� ` B)TUM INDUS _______ _ 6 + ____ w -__ I X X _ O0l m ONi _____ _ X -w w _ - - - _- '-_ ---_ -, / - _ - OSC1CP yP7iv�iTDG�_� _ _ - � � .�• � �—I � Yp ,.�I_. - N a 9Ag p Age 9y. nl ro p D 00 0 g 107+00 o U 108+01.D% _°� SeDu_ - a° - - �D9+�� - - - - - U XCEL MEDIACOM - ,__- FY00= 0B-3 w Iro - = t= _ — p -1+00-- - - - _ 0- 10 �, FOX STREET -" - �'� N ---- N ----------- N W 4 O O' p O i�.TIT�CINT� SO N �O� I O N CENTERPOINT _ _ - GO �i D ,- _ M 7 - L ea o — _ ---- _ — --------------T,LARGE RocD L 1�6 i � '` � BI UMINOU � f RELOCATE MAILBOX � � `, 1 r � _= � I - ,----- -� LJJ Q � � ,� INS�ALLB612 CURBBrGUTTEK 7COPFROM EXISTJN6'PAVEMENTF TO S(A j (I-'T{EMOVA"C LIMITS EXTEND UP TO 3' , 110+34 _ BEHIND THE CURB / WETLAND 'I// CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TYP) 1 i Q M 0 I 1 Ur MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS /— GENERAL NOTES: --z x----- o- // - _ _ _ _ _ �_ I CONSTRUCTION LEGEND = u - z w 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — — — —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - W 2. INSTALLA 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY u= CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. F- < 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY �► 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY ROAD CROSS SLOPE TOP OF FINISHED `^ ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. x = GRADE ELEVATION 0 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PID: 041 1723430003 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 111r.ERRY 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE 2765 Fox St. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF n AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 H O PROTECTTREE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." O INSTALL GUARDRAIL OI PROTECT LANDSCAPING .. © SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL OJ 8612 CURB & GUTTER V 1106+36.53 VP 107+66.50 LEV 952.92 E EV 950:32 r F !L- FL- FOXRE © INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN OK 81012 CURB & GUTTER CUR E LEN=.120- 0' CUR LEN -105.0 ' OD PROTECT MAILBOX © PROTECT POWER POLE 9]0 E 0.41' : E 0.20 EO RELOCATE MAILBOX 970 O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) .. .. VPI 108+72.0 .. .. ELEV 949.6 FD PROTECT DRIVEWAY O GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 965 C RVELEN=10 .00' E=0.43' GO PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT- TANGENT TERMINAL 965 VPI 109+92. 1...... :::'. :'.: .: .:: .'.::. '.::.VPI. 11+56:50.. ELEV 953. ELE 944.68 URVE LEN=9 :00' CURVE EN=140.00' 960 E=0.94' E:0.66' 960 In M 111. c -I c.j Ln m. . �. s+l p N .. 955 :: :: :: OY :: o w PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE Vp1 : T 111 �:: m v :: ry'. o. w :: + 01 .o -I T : a'. :: o+ m : : o vi 955 a w0+0 V . 2:08% > W. W p > M W 950 -0,50 — --- — — _ W 950 EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE.. o o.... .,. ..... ....... ...... ....,. .,... .,..... ...... ....,. .,... .,..... .... ...... .,..... .... ...... 945 945 r a 940 940 935 935 .Itl '�. O LD O1 O. a-1 :.N O. .m ..I ..Ill n N 00 a O N Ot N ry .Ol w O N N .: '.: LO m Lq '.: M T .O 00 .O. Un : .: '.U, Y. O M A .r-1 O O .O W ^ V N ry lO O v .LD w O. .N O1 .111 N .:.O1 lO .:.: e -I ID Ol : V On N I` N. LO :..-.I n N ry �w �� .m �N �� m nn �� rn ..N m �� rv. N �� N. .cH �� �. cH —�N �m �. p �� �� O .0 C,� O p —� M� o p — on o. Q1 �— o 6. .on --�T 6. O O mm o p Wim: O „H �� �, mm: �. N �m N �� N .N 61 cy On Wim: �. p Wim: o. M �I di. DO �� 66 h �� ^ `0 �On ID Cg Wim: Ni Un �m N. .� �� a. V [I �m930 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REY DFD DniE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDERMYDIRE SUPERVISION UNDER THELAWSOFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, AND THAT I AMA OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER A S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CH MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5,02 HOR2. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Phone: (952) 448-8838 Phone: & M E N K Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com lton-menk.com AKM ZZ cxECRED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI AII 10828 www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 ORO\ CI3110 8\c DC3D\117, H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828ALl.dwg 2/21/201] 1:30 PM Ll.d.g DATE NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN. PROVIDED BY E 1�4 N. LINE, SE 1�4 OF THE S \ L- a N THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR m TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY w Q o GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-500-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. LOT 2 Ln w - z THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 0411723410010 S REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO OHNSON o AIA MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUR€I©1£,SPF 'ul1 m TBEHIND THE 2530 FOX ST. w CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND w z w o D z0 o DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." z w ED F X w w l=7 2 z H an z w a6 REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO l7 z z O z ¢ w _ K N T BEHIND THE CURB w o s N m K N 0 L.L. w O o¢ o � �_ ,�� O� r N Nt=.r ar +� min Q +� nr a -Z �Q o�oZm K C w ti tiz N� +z ID .ti +z +oc +am ti v a CLEAN DITCH N THIS AREA z ti? r z D vri m CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) -''r"- `°5 --� ? _ ¢ , ~ 4, ------------ _ ,rm "' °' a z a w a z z - t v - - - -- WATER-- -- -- -- -- -- rz r �r BOULDER WALL w 4� I 5 � ..i ��� � � � � �. �4, ���10� _DH -- �/. + 'z 17 28y O, 22� - -f I, PIPE EN `< m �I x� __ ----_ _ _ — — _ I, 12'zHDPE APPflQX EL _ _ 24 ',- UNB y ' -gas`s z,r -1' r -- _,-Y-3❑,..., r ..� = — — {�---�� = — — — oo G _ B aaou�oERer — _ _ — - H 37J . 22' X (PRIVATE) - - `_ n - --------------- o, 939.24 ti' o 93 -- - - - - - �t _ 113+00 114+00_ o 0 X50 �, + °j �> o 0 00 N - N CENTEOPOrINT -- -- _-_____-_-FOX N - N N - GENERAL NOTES: 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY, WIDT�5. 041 1723410005 � I 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON TH M. & G. WENGLER CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 2420 FOX ST 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON ITHE PANS. EQUIRIED ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE RATINTERSECTIONS. o o y I I z II�IAAA 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. I D N O INl\ 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. z c + z � 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDIATNG TIE o 9 RELOI I ctimCATION OF POWER POLES. � o z Z W o z_ SALVAGE & REINSTALL BRICK PAVERS _O Z m^ IZ o RO Z m L OVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO A ¢ o= -i z + L1 In o o m i Z a c - HIND THE CURB -------- - A - _ WETLAND C) _ _ ®� _i 1C Q CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP)------- I I--------�� spur RAIL FENCE -�?__ -- -- ------ ---------------- "-_-- _ = -ems --" ------ WH N-- -- - - �- --- - - - - - _ ANDscA Z - '- --- ----- ----- --- - , y- _ T — ` � STREET �� �- _ _ — 0 FOX _ o -- -- "" — - a , ou ° � � uu Cu 0 - - ---- _ _ a _ — E -- - --- - -- �.p�-- -- - - - -- R 'CENTERP9INT_ - --- - - --,- --- -- - -- - - �, r�rE-•�„�r�"i•v-'�' _ _. -_ ��— --- -rnr °� r��,-z"'" L ..ou E� eervo qH�D -- o - - ---- -- - L rd"�-s:P� ---- --- -- --- ------------------ --- - u - ° -{ { £ - --- --y-- ��I - —o -- --- -- -�(U -------------- D ----- ----- D b - - - _0 _/r � _ ___ ____ -- CRETE— ---- F -' IuINoSCAPE 1 -- `n L `{„1 \ \''`-Z�%', — _ _ _ _ _� __ND ____ -�-------- WETu, ----- 1 __ ___ __ _ - - ----------------- —"-=-,�_ �� - FLAT STONE WALL; y S -L. 12 ?L'��� a WETLAND `W FANCY MAILBOX W1 IZ" WOOD POSTS _- -- - - -= -- - OU - 10 *10" _ CONSTRUCTION LEGEND w� } _ MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE / BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — — — —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS / �► ROAD CROSS SLOPE - - - _ _ - - -- -- - - 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X _ TOP OF FINISHED o - -- - - - - GRADE ELEVATION w "- _ -- m --- - - 0411723440002 NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY ® AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 O H O = w PROTECTTREE v x - m J& S GRUDNOWSKI / St. THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFYAO ti v o 2555 Fox INSTALL GUARDRAIL O PROTECT LANDSCAPING y w GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-232-1166 OR 651-434-0002. / © SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL OJ B612 CURB & GUTTER / THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF C INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN O OK B1012 CURB & GUTTER / CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION ANDOp PROTECT MAILBOX © PROTECT POWER POLE DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." ED RELOCATE MAILBOX r F OSTR FO PROTECT DRIVEWAY O O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 955 1 1 ` GO PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT -TANGENT TERMINAL 955 ELEV 40.9$. CURVE LE N=$0.00''.: .'.:: .::, .,: ,: .: .',: E=: 58' VP[12 +59.80 950 VPI i 9+62.21 ELEV. 37.44 -inr :: nn- VPI: 124+0 FIFVq:tr 2fi 11 950 CURVE EN=50.00' i=019' URVE LEN`1 0:00' .,..: ..:.ti L....... D .... ...... .... ...... E=0.26', ........,.,.. ...... .. .. ......, ...,..: ...,.... ...... .... .. .. ...... ...... ......,. .....,... :..,....: ...... ...,: :..,.,.. ...... ....... .......,. E-0,20' .....,.. :. ...... 945 .,. .......m m Lo....... M .,.. ...... .. .. ....... .,.... ..... ....... .. .,.... ...... ......, ....,. .... .. ....... .,.. .,.... ...... ......, ....,.. ...... ...... ......, ....,.. ..,.... ...... ......, 945 F ..d � w ^ + m IO N W. n to : wo O M . m >. . mN, Ln ^+ On H : + N .N I� J 0) N. l0 m.. OY . . 940 ____ m m> PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE: J n w w m LH m N w 940 F- 0.92% -O.10% 935 - - - 935 ..EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE. 01 930 930 925 925 920 920 o .. ... ' :. Lo LD . '.::o ....o . '.:: v .... m oo M ... Lo ......m :Lo ',M ....m ... w ... m o o' ''... .......w...Mry..Nry...o......o o' '',.... .m 'm' ...ao .n , ...LD v .... m.a ' ...,c vm �� M rc �m w .Ol " �� �. W �� 6j h ^' �� 0-� ^. a .� M m �� .� M �� m mM �� N ^m �m �. ID m o 16 . D —DT '0 m om m mm �. .h mm �T ^. ^ mm ^. h mm �m ^ F mm ^ .h mm �m ^ h mm �m ^. h mm 0,m �. AD : ^'m �m �. .� m �m .� m �m mm �m p mm �m U, i0 ^'m �m '0 .lD m O. LDi0915a� mm915 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 IIEV —EDIDR WE HEREBY CE0.TIFY THAT THI5 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAW50FTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA. DESID jj\1 S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.04 HOR2. SCALE VERT. FEET SCALE FEET h Pone: (952) 448-8838 & M E N K Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com AKM cxECRED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI 91 All 10828 www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 ORO\ CI3110 8\c DC3D\117, H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828ALl.dwg 2/21/201] 1:30 PM Ll.d.g DATE NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY N 4 o THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR W j� 4114 �(/ / i �` yam, ----- i \ - _ 2 2 - O TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY ' �OV i ^ c�NfDF GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. / m e -" \ X 2 v BEGIN S.A.P. 152-105-002 i o STA lO+OO.00 re � THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. h NDSB PE�Q 1 m O~ �-- THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ----_ S -' _------------ -- ------_--_ CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND -------------- MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS * DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." ---------------------- 10 G _-_ -oo J -----_---- N - ------------ " -��P -- --- ---_----- W y - _ - -- - - - --- - REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO WPFDKS_-� WLLIa- THE CURB --------- 02'BEHIND 95 �Q,gs-- \ o D ____ ------- 'ho �o a ° E- Alp, , , O`. 5 l_ 17-9+00 �m -------------- ' 0 ------------- '-, !'� �- \\ �x - _ w , J \ n'� O 0 y, \ �^1 \ c _ `�`• `.� \��. '(+.ems S*00 `� N 'i2'��`4�� _� �H. /� 1Z7" t4 \ tey � _ N _ 31b +00 X' O -SCA12T ARO C ou- END CITY PROJECT � Z No _ / L - - - 126+00 - ' "� ou - STA 129+28.81 ��E}C OR sroP 1 - . r^�.t" �" v'' '' CONSTRUCTION LEGEND NO aAe - �� r`' Y 1 LOT 9 \ _ ;-�, 'Q ao�� _ _ �- '`, X ' {l ,_\ x - = vy'�� - -'' c BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS o b L ou _ ( - - ___ -____ __ _________ - \ + Z o 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY ROAD CROSS SLOPE X _ TOP OF FINISHED GENERAL NOTES:_ { -'- GRADE ELEVATION - ;- --- 1. FIELD VERIFY AND NTATCH-ALL-EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. ;� \ ----- - - --- `, y AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 2. INSTALL A 4-INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW(EPDXY)_ONT+iE-- _ _ _ \ ___---- CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. — — — O® OH PROTECT TREE _ _ _ — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. — AO INSTALL GUARDRAIL OI PROTECT LANDSCAPING _ ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS.�_ _ _ _ © SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL OJ B612 CURB & GUTTER 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ---- — --- 5. CURB &GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. � --_� — -_ C INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN OK 81012 CURB &GUTTER _ 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE — — - OD PROTECT MAILBOX O PROTECT POWER POLE L RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. / 0 RELOCATE MAILBOX O RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) Fr R O O PROTECT DRIVEWAY O GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 1 1 \ 960 GO PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT- TANGENT TERMINAL 960 VPI 127+ 6.27 ,ELEV 947.8 7 CURVE LEN 144.00 ro m 955 E=. ao mos ; ' a 955 .VPI 126+53 49 w VPI 124+07 26 -.. -.. ::: :: .: ELEV.939:. URVE LEN-105.001-> 7 -..: : :F LLr > 950 ELEV 935.1 -," 950 URvrTFN_=. .. ... .. ..,.. ...,.. .,. .,. ... N:. .., ......1.1. o ._ ... .. .... E-0.20' off: N J 945 a " 945 ., .. ry n. ... .. .. m .... ... 06 OY.. PROPO1.SE CENTERLINE PROFILE. .,. �: 0/ .. :: .. :: .. ::. ... .. .. ... ... ., .,. .,. .. , C Oi N WL W 940 a w 940 o �. . :1.88 0 --.— 0.82% - - -- .. EXISTING C 'dRLINE w.:.. PROFILE 935 —.-.—.—.— .— ..... ....... ...... ....... ..... .. ... ...... ... ........ F .. ... .. ...... ....... .. ... ...... ....... .. .. ..... 935 930 .. . . .. .... .. . .. 930 925 925 al .M : ry '.:.V �.: .l0 O N. .cq n �. .Ol M P. c-1 :', :.0 �: .m ry .Lq : Ot m. .ar n ry �: n �. .M n N M .I[I m. .ar O `�: c-1 �. .OY .n N "IF! Lq v .ar O. .O m. ry O. LD 4: 920`"' Oi -.:-m 'Ol ,6 ^' .::m m 'Ol .lD "+ .::--^'�"+ m 'Ol W. i0 :: ^''^ m Ol '0 .lD ::-.. -^'�., m 'M 6 h -. ...mM m '01 '6. .F ....mm m 'Ol ^ .h -::-mm m M ^ h .:-,-, mm m M ^ W -, -,,: m"+ m 'M pj. W m�, m C` �. .Ol -m a On �, O ^� .: -. a n Oi a- Oi ry -.::- am.::: m on M v`v 'Ol vl am m On 9. VO ::..a� 'M N lD ....am "M .h ::..am 'Ol ^ :... DO va M �. Do -. -. ay.: m 'M .. DO av m 'M .. .� :..vv m 'Ol .� ..vv.:.am m -Ol m 'M : -. -. -. :: -. 920 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 0 20 40 0 5 10 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON FEV BFB BniE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, UNDEP MY RIPE SUPERVISION NO HATI UNUFFTHEUWSOFTHE STATEOFMINNESOTA. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER S.A.P. ��N DRAWN CITY OF 152-105-002 ORONO, MINNESOTA SHEET 5.05 HOR2. VERT. Pone: (952) 448-8838 h AKM OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET & M E N K Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com lton-menk.com FOX STREET cxEcxEB IMPROVEMENTS DAVID P. MARTINI Bono\C.O,Inc 2017, All Rights Reserved www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 H:\ORNO\[13110826\CAD\C3D\110828ALl.dwg 2/21/2017 1:30 PM DATE I I I II II I I I I I i I I I I I I I BEGIN S.A.P. 152-105-002 I I z I � I STA 10+00.00 z _ - zzll I z z� I _------------------- ti 3 z a z T i z ------- ------ w L ry z + Q u 00 REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO w Ln tn------- _ ol`,---------� ----( i m oil �� Q o �---------------------------EH -------------- 8 IN T CURB z w Z OE'N,r�E---`- �'� •�� �•� I ' CU+ In . RY L1Nk ` -~ky- __-0 f�� n z- }— + �O \ _ — - . vii w m� / ' L ----------- I — - — — —�_� o+ L.. O --_-----_-----.moi Z_------------------ O Q ~ w O Y s _o N O ___ ___ __ may .-+P _ __ Cl _ — — _ _ — - _ _ Z ---- - ------ i �m w g - —_—_ _ + + D ORS __ -= = U) S �1 G 8g o ♦ --_9 . �z+OOH.. 1� 0 1W, - _ -_ z - - - n., _ - _______ tTwr - --__ {`.' .3, - _{ � ' ___ - MATCH iSTING INDUS a = ♦� 'O �, ' , rn '�. .�, �� N'� i -- — — 13+00 i aNT - ----- - -- - - � ----- --- -- -_�`"-------- - - ---------------------_ - - � — �� - - - — _ a - �l --- � I N I I ,1 I 14+ I 00 - --------- - � =__ - _ 'w � — — I _ I OO o EAD u, o - _ FOX STREET cTOP i O !, STA 11+68-- ---- ScrtAVEL _ -��ti�`� C �- �� -�_ ou ���"• r�+ — — '-�-__ B __ _ _ I->g'n0 0 0 ; , 33.99 RT 9 _Gt +--- `' �� � ♦\_ v - `' '000 --- L ;�" a-- - - �_�'-_'-Y- '�, ou _ - - - -- �5 - ou = ; �� ;\ S TYP CONSTRUCTION LIMIT ( ) — --- - - - —� - - _ __-- DU-�__________ _ ____ - 9Q MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS / a - - _- cp _-`-_-_-------- -END CITY PROJECT END STA 129+28.81 \ "�/l ` O GENERAL NOTES: E G ST T T F R T O S O PRO DED B NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN N THIS HAS VIY R` v T S BEEN S P m A THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR v 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. o w vi S9 TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY O 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE z a Z GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. _ w = v, m 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. F o THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. < w THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND \ 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. \DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. \ FOX S REE 975 975 VPI 3+82.96 ELE 969:00 uia CURVE EN=170.00 m N 970 . .. .. ... ... .. .. `". L>„ .. ... ..1D rn .. . VPI 15+8Z' 42 970 ELEV 960.22 co i w a N CURVE LEN 60.00' m 965 t 7- -T— ---_ w 965 VPI 101+514.68 " : ELEV 949.8 5 > 4.4095: > w ELEV 951 03 .. CURVE LEN=8 ,00' CURVE LEN` 0;00':: '.::. :. : '.:: :.: E=1.01 .,.. : .. '.:. ....... .. .... .. .. .... ...... ...... ..:.... CONSTRUCTION LEGEND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — — — — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS E0.32 t v --- 960 So lb } DO b, or, '.: '.:� � ROAD CROSS SLOPE o 955oa m' .`n -I �� + m *oma' o m Mwon + m + N m >w `y 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X _ TOP OF FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION 955 w u uJ = w va EXISTING C NTERLINE P FILE w. > > AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 H O PROTECT TREE 950 2.20% -_ 1.00% _ --_' OA INSTALL GUARDRAIL OI PROTECT LANDSCAPING 950 PROPOSED CENTERLINE ROFILE © SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL O 8612 CURB & GUTTER � o ... ., ., ., : ., ., : © INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN OK 81012 CURB & GUTTER 945 Ln o y :: .: :: , . .., OD PROTECT MAILBOX O O RELOCATE MAILBOX O PROTECT POWER POLE RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) 945 FO PROTECT DRIVEWAY O GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 940 © PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT- TANGENT TERMINAL 940 m m ::Lo a ::: '.00 g...,.. ,Ln ... �:... ..n : : :: v ....n : : '.Do n : oo �:.. m :: aw N .. ..N '.Lo w.. ....a : .ti .... N �:.. Lo a '.m g: .. ..H '.o �:. ....o : t+I'.v:.Lo p .. ao a. .. o .. ..a : : . ao ....o T: .. ..o ry N .. Ln 4 o m m ry : '.d., : uo ry .. ..o ru g. a :Lo m .... .a oa w n J. '.M'.n:.., a r- .... .w ,op... m m 935 ...0 ' �� '0-60 �m p.....0 ��: .... O C5, �� o.... O on ... ..� Mm o. ....CD M� p ....� M° cH M.::: ti N Wim: �m .� �m h �. ..� �m m ... rl Mme: .... M Mm N... C m ... ..N ....� �* N ....� �m Wim:: �.... Wim: N... N. ....1 �m v M �� m ..N Mm N ... N Wim: N.... 'H Mm:::�� ti... �. ..� �m935 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 IIEV I-EDI.A DniE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME O0. UNUERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER T1E1W501THE STATEOFMINNESOTA. DBIGNED S.A.P. 152-105-002 Aw SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.06 HOR2. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET S& M E N Pone: h K Email: Chaska@6olton-menk.com (952) 448-8838 AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHECKED OF DAVID P. MARTINI Bolton&Menk, Inc 2017, AIIR,ght,R...—d —bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN &PROFILE 49 H:\ORND\C13110828\CAD\C3D\110828AL1.dwg2/21/2017 1:30PM DATE I I I II i I I I II I I I I I I I I I I Do p /ISV1 w I I I Z w o z z2 = w N O F N Z B- O z F z w u, C0 O In 0 N _ = z �J CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA z 1= cJ vl o¢ m m 1 N - o ¢a' vI -------------------------------------------------------- z CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) ----- ---------- o f-� m---------------- N a -----------L L-- c 0 z -------------------------- ------ z cH U + F — 0+0 F ---------------- —J 1`1 11 i-�w-�z-- ¢Z, _ _ — -- —° -- -- — — -- — — -- -- — — ., m � w ` LANDSCAPE L~iL w� ut (MULCN�__- f"1 fie'— _ _ _ - " L1— _ - __-___ _ _ , ® �C 3 - - 28' _ - m ouesT � .`t,.t°,`=i..l��n - -_ - ==- i Sy � ------------- ------ -- ----------- E3 ------- - - ----- ---- 44_.x'- .,� SLI -- % % I ! ; ' ,.?''..,�"' c tlrx , -' ---,rn ' ''_`C'u ct�.. - - ---- -- r / ®cA DUES cH ® C --- /C D D r_u c -kJ Y -- D _.q _ - cENT,;F� - --i-�- -- r- - , TENT .--DINI d ---- - - e - , x _ OB -B FOX STREET 19+00 20+00 21+00 22 00 1 -- - -- l!i A W N N 1 N .tCEL—` 1 _ N O O O O O 10 XC _ - s WOOD POSTS �` ;E e 6' wog0 aqs. _ tiW�ol Pr -- -- -' --- -- ,OFO S — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - -r ry o _ _ _ _ _ A __ __ __ _ _ ____ ,. SITAR H AVE — _ _ PFFU� SG"MPL8o E MkIS iiBAO N EL �"—„' -cT' � ”'----- z "rafE 7�7�-1- 1�(-c`" _ ,ref-` r x� ;r'7`h�-t -? - Q ,ti kgs E ) ----- - L = - - _ --- - --- - — __ _ z'�;--F' k @scAPE (R0>"KjAP -� ---- - - - ----- ate_ qu - ou - Oun z ' f f { ® 2 -- _ / i L _, ___ - _ ___� = O N _ _ — _— _ , W V, , �ITLIP tI qUs 1i z OU � � 0 OUOU� r�n I OU 0 OU - ti F Z BRICK SIGN COLUMN SPLIT RAIL FENCE BRICK SIGN COLUMN BRICK SIGN COLUMN F SPLIT RAIL FENCE pO BRICK SIGN COLUMN PROTECT SANITARY --I MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS J z w GENERAL NOTES: FLUSHING VAVLE w o = Q CONSTRUCTION LEGEND v N z w 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY a W = w 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR Q BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — — — —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS N CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY Lu O -1 ROAD CROSS SLOPE ¢ w 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. m TOP OF FINISHED U'' ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. Lu 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY x = GRADE ELEVATION 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND OH PROTECTTREE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." AO INSTALL GUARDRAIL O PROTECT LANDSCAPING © SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL 0B612 CURB & GUTTER Fr 1 O J� R �^ �'` 1 \ C C © INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN OK B1012 CURB & GUTTER 980 OD PROTECT MAILBOX © PROTECT POWER POLE v 22+81.26 980 EO RELOCATE MAILBOXO RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) - CUR E LEN -295.0 ' FO PROTECT DRIVEWAY 0 GUTTER OUT CURB &GUTTER E=2.69 © PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT- TANGENT TERMINAL 975 975 E I EV 960.22 V 1.20+06.81 CURNE LEN=60.00: VPI 18 18.58 E EV 965:44 E=0.25' ELEV 9 7:62 CUR E LEN=120.0 ' M D m 16 970 CURVE. LE _ ;150.00' N ry 7 970 d W w w Do !n n W : ::: ::.: ::.: : 7 :. ::. ::>ILL o: of 965 3 a Do g ui o6w m > w = - 965 J w EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE +� w +mon a 4. 960 -_ - _--- w .: 960 PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE: 955 955 950 950 945 945 r O N W Ol V1 .ice .M : I11 'H M 1 Ol M c.l ... .V N .M ^ DO N 01 M M n VJ N .O .V ti Itl N O N : O O M 00 V) ^ lD �. n V a UD .'-1 N .n I` N H m ch V N .OY .lp : N O .W O ^ Sl O O00 O N V t0 O 940! m'� �� o) ��: m 01 �� ��: .. M .. .DO M� W oo on�::::�m:: 00 w. OG Wim: oo On �� cn M �� m 0 6 �m cy ��: o 'y �m ry mom: N. M �m �� .� �m �::: .. ul Wim: �. N �� N. .� �m N LM �� N UOm Lu UOm: N. .UO ��::��: �. wD L . N ui �m940 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REY DFD WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS THE STATE MINNESOTA. WAS PREPARED BY ME ENGINO0. PROFESSIONAL EER 11W S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 OF OF CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5,07 HOR2. SCALE FEET VERT. SCALE FEET & M E N K h Pone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com lton-menk.com AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI cxECRED Bolmn&Menk, Inc 2017, Al\11O8s www.bolton-menk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 AL3-d.d H:\DRNO\[13110828\CAD\C3D\110828ALl.dwg 2/21/2017 1:30 PM DATE u CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) L rBLIND INT. AHEAD 4; -- ------- 124 -1 --------- - - - - - - - ------------ 6 6 12* 2" j,"2' ------ E3 CP M --- -------- 142� 1 -------------- ------ --- ---------- ---- - ----- - --- --------- -- ------ - ------- ----- T71 u. CH- �A -- - ---- 7�- - ----- - - -------- � - - - m 23�4� 24+00 25+00 FOX STREET 22 00 28 00T1 1T- qj 4p, OB -10 i —=----- — — — — -- — — — — — -- =--- - — — --- — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- -- ------- ------ --------- ---------------- I ------------------ --------- ------- --------- - _;� - ----- ------ ----------- ------------ ------- ---- ------- ------ --- -- -- --- ----------- --- -- ------ ---- - - -------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - �z7 --- -------- —!n�------- ---- --------- '�o -------- ------ - ---------- ------ ----------- ou ou o ou ou L ou ou— ------- 7- 'Qu 64 ou ou— w o 7 CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA GENERAL NOTES: 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY zi 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR u CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY 4 w 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. S. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF L-1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND —11110. ROAD CROSS SLOPE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X TOP OF FINISHED F71 GRADE ELEVATION AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 PROTECT TREE VPI 22+81 26 FOX ST REET ELEV 966. 31, CU FIVE UEN=2 95.00- AO INSTALL GUARDRAIL OI PROTECT LANDSCAPING 970 E=169 SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL 0 B612 CURB & GUTTER 970 (D INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN O B1012 CURB & GUTTER (D PROTECT MAILBOX PROTECT POWER POLE 965 EO RELOCATE MAILBOX RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) 965 UD DO FO PROTECT DRIVEWAY GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 960 N1> PROTECT CULVERT OO END TREATMENT TANGENT TERMINAL 960 DO N. Un 955 --6.8r, 1 dz� > :PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE::: 955 VP1 26+3103 ELEV942 75 URVE LEN= 00.00' 950 E=1.63 950 945 EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE m Do q Ln m 945 . .. . .. . .. .... .. . .. . .. . .... . .. .. > 940 940 935 .. .... . .... .. .... .. .... I 935 LO DO DO Lq . . . . . . AD DO r-. . . . Dq . . . . cq . . Dq 2 q UD U, m L', AD I -q m U0 OP q L', `� . w Up .. ... . Do Ol .... P. 930 U1 U, 10 10 L' on 1. on ci mi di U` Do m ch on w -* m On I A m on On on o on on o On I On On On SO On 930 22,00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26-00 27+00 28+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 FEV —ED FDR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT T 15 PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYD111. UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DU LY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL =EE, UNDER THE LAWS THE STATE MINNESOTA. jj�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON OF OF CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.08 HORZ. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com & MENK AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OHEC(ED OF DAVID P. MARTINI 21�7 AIIR,ght,R ... —d —bolton—enkxom 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 IH�B,Rt,n�C,Mmkiln, o 3. FNC2 3D\11O828AL1.d.g2/21/201] 1:30 PM UC. NO. DATE ti ,�1 \ = w w o \ (=.1 = ~ w Z w \ \ z = w i —+3 u w _ _ z0- _ __ _ ------------------ --- -------- L CE'NJURY INK - = G--- 6 C - RPQINT 28 00 x, 29+OQ 30+00 FOX STREET 31 N GENERAL NOTES 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER. S. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. z z 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE z Z uw RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. n w M w w N p M ❑ m3 N- ++3 ap Qo M- v� w w r w CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) imffL'ANE' !n m –W G wET�nND – – – – – – L c –WETLAND – – – - – – – – – RKER C OU�o�U- _ _ _ ou _ ou {E - — — — — _ -------- �_ - ----------- _ -- — - - - - — - — _ 93 -- - CAUTION CAUTION ' CONCRETE 32+00 BRIDGE DECK BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC=935.81 i 33+00 o 134+00 OB -12 0 z r — w = w u = Q w l7 l7 l7 z z z z � w W M z W I� + 0 N p (rt ❑_ + M N + .M z_—Q O G D m z r W N w N W F W v m \ v m L - ---- - G wETUNo �-- _ L o Du o (� ou - - - -WALL ---- ly-___yyjNG_ ALL CONCRETE 32+00 BRIDGE DECK BENCHMARK FOX CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP)-WETLAND _WETLAND _ _ _ _ _ _ GAS MARKER - ---_-----�� ----------- -�---- '93-'9"' c�uESi &33+00 N _ _ 0 34+00 N o in NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY I THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY END S.A.P. 152-105-002 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. I STA 34+53.78 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND I\ DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." cfl OB -12 CAUTION DISK IN CONC=935.81tiCAITON = ___----- - -- a` �'Q __" _ WING1NNl______ __ - __ _ _ _ CONCRETE __ __ _______ __ — --_ — ________ __ ST WING WALL �-- --- � — �s �-- ST ---MEILAND_— ��� WETLAND Y� WETLAND �D �\ \` GAS M KER m z m m0 O r ----�� �1.4�`, O F w Or Q n Q o N oA 6� AT m Q M EXISTING BITUMINOUS M3 m3 \\\I1, 93 OB -13 f AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Appointment of 2017 Seasonal Employees Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Work Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval of seasonal employees. 2. Background. The hourly pay is proposed to be $10.00-12.00 for the Golf Course Clubhouse Attendants; $10 for Golf Course Maintenance Assistants and $11.00 for Parks Maintenance Workers; a pay range of $10.25-15.22 for the Utilities Maintenance Worker; and a pay range of $15.00-$20.00 for the Assistant Superintendent and Clubhouse Manager. The clubhouse manager will be enrolled in the coordinated PERA plan. All other seasonal employees will fall under the 6 month PERA Classification, and are therefore excluded from PERA membership. 3. Seasonal Employee Appointments and Candidates. 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: f Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ Name Position Wage Remarks ($/h) Robert Howells G.C. Clubhouse Manager $18.00 Returnee Jason Goehring G.C. Assistant Superintendent $16.00 Returnee Ivan Corazalla G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $12.00 Returnee Paul Tolzmann G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $11.00 Returnee Diane Otrey G.C. Clubhouse Assistant $10.00 New Rebecca Anderson Parks Maintenance Worker $11.00 Returnee EdKvam G.C. Maintenance Assistant $10.00 Returnee 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: f Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 6 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Saga Hills Park Improvement Project Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Work Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to gain Council Approval to proceed with the Saga Hills Improvement project. 2. Background. The Park Commission identified Saga Hills as a focus park for 2016 and 2017. After engagements with the local residents and historical research, the Saga Hills subcommittee recommended a set of improvements for the park. (See Exhibit B for background presentation) At the March 3rd, 2017 meeting the Park Commission voted 7-0 to forward the project to the City Council for approval. 3. Project Scope The scope of work for the improvement project includes clearing trees from and planting the hilltop area with native grasses; installing trail and information signs; installing two benches and installing trail gates. See Exhibit A for draft plans. 4. Cost. The estimated cost for the project is $36,780. 5. Funding. This project would be funded through the Park Fund. The Park Fund Balance is projected to be $808,863 at the End of 2017 if this project is approved. 6. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that Council approve the proposed project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Saga Hills Improvement project for up to $36,780. Exhibit A. Saga Hills Plans B. Saga Hills Background Prepared By: Reviewed By: 71F— Approved By: D5^ Saga Hills Park Project Asof7Mar 17 Task Description Who Cost Clear hilltop area (4.5 Acres) Contract $18,000 Plant hilltop area with grasses and natives 4.5 Acres Contract $ 8,250 Benches x2 PW $ 620 Install trail signs (x10) PW $ 400 i Install information sign (x2) PW $ 1,140 Y Install trail gates (x2) PW $ 2,240 20 % Contingency $ 6,130 TOTAL 1 $ 36,780 4 Saga Hill Nature Area • Orono's Largest Park with greatest amount of trail mileage (excluding Big Island and Golf Course) • Integral part of Orono's Swedish history (part of historical "New Sweden") • Park Originated by citizen involvement • Supported by the Saga Hill Preservation Society • Soil Study (1997) • Vegetation Field Review (1997) • Archaeological Inspection (IMAC 1997) • Plant Species Compilation (Univ. MN 1995) • Bird Survey (1995) • Funded with 3x more private than City funds • $125,000 in DNR grants require "trail maintenance" and "vegetation management" bvjohnson 2-6-2017 � LSM C o v�. - a 1 , e A 1 P Al U� r Mxnk ine-vee his 415/zot�3�4z aM SAGA HILL PARK Saga Hill Nature Area • Orono's Largest Park with greatest amount of trail mileage (excluding Big Island and Golf Course) • Integral part of Orono's Swedish history (part of historical "New Sweden") • Park Originated by citizen involvement • Supported by the Saga Hill Preservation Society • Soil Study (1997) • Vegetation Field Review (1997) • Archaeological Inspection (IMAC 1997) • Plant Species Compilation (Univ. MN 1995) • Bird Survey (1995) • Funded with 3x more private than City funds • $125,000 in DNR grants require "trail maintenance" and "vegetation management" bvjohnson 2-6-2017 0 Feet / © �O Q 0 plsclalmer: `�kFSHr��� M1�s drpwing Is neltryera legalry [ecwEeO mep nw a and is rot inm,dea m M u�d az aec. M -is SAGA HILL PARK raaetl In yarlaas Wsyceanry, antl nate ogRcea, antl otM1er �affen�ng fAea eu sM1own,aM 6mheu�d Aeref ante parpm¢only.TM1e [iry of dro"'d epomclbk foreny lrvaarxcles herein contalrred ®Bolton&M—k,Inc-Web GIS 4/9/2014342PM Saga Hill Park Current Features: One mi. trail, 0.75 mi loop (hiking, nature observation, Dog walking, x -country skiing) Opportunity to experience Maple Basswood "Big Woods" High point: 1041.3 ft —Views? (112 ft above Lk Mtka) Stand of white pine Quaking Aspens Wild flower area Creek, Ravine, Old car, view of Forest Lake Small Pond, Wetland bvjohnson 2-6-2017 Fee'. Saga Hill Park Evolution �E G'y Msdadmn. tA,�,SH�pE Tngdr.w�pg�s�art�e,a�a��ry,ttmd� maa�a,a 1994-2008 SAGA HILL PARK 4ouaetl In var'awclry, munry, antl stere ovR�s, ab othersw� affating Me area sM1own, ab t m be emd be refeeence pu.vascs onlv.iM1e city at �mm s nm spn�s�b�e to, v ar.v �crs Femi�wntalrred, r•. .0 � �br. � -._r � -. ar�.l X13: �`� f --�- i+ �• 1/ �.��. ry TOTAL ACREAGE: 30.37 State (DNR): $125,000 City of Orono $ 48,300 Private Citizens $123,000 Midwest Bank Foreclosure July 1996 $149,000 DNR $50,000/Private $99,000 11.31 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Valek Tax Forfeiture March 1999 (Acquired Nov 1994) No Restrictions 8.89 A Sollner-Webb Purchase April 1999 $147,300 DNR $75,000/Private $24,000/City $48,300 8.27 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Hennessy Trade May 2004 (Lot 63 for 58) 1.22 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Wildhurst Tax Forfeiture 2008 No Restrictions 0.68 A bvjohnson 2-6-2017 i r•. .0 � �br. � -._r � -. ar�.l X13: �`� f --�- i+ �• 1/ �.��. ry TOTAL ACREAGE: 30.37 State (DNR): $125,000 City of Orono $ 48,300 Private Citizens $123,000 Midwest Bank Foreclosure July 1996 $149,000 DNR $50,000/Private $99,000 11.31 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Valek Tax Forfeiture March 1999 (Acquired Nov 1994) No Restrictions 8.89 A Sollner-Webb Purchase April 1999 $147,300 DNR $75,000/Private $24,000/City $48,300 8.27 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Hennessy Trade May 2004 (Lot 63 for 58) 1.22 A Restrictive Covenant (Orono/DNR) Wildhurst Tax Forfeiture 2008 No Restrictions 0.68 A bvjohnson 2-6-2017 Change in Ground Cover 1934 1960 •• rA �� �'i� c r i � � � s-r �c bvjohnson 2-6-2017 <y 4 OF r � M' ` f ~ Imag LA reo9ogical 77� T fis . w�F3�aric ty,, �. mAmp, *,ROHL yW .4f ty z r } to Os ry. w!Avewg m AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 17-3898, Dale Richardson/CBS-MN Properties, 2060 Wayzata Blvd. West, Amend PUD No. 2C Agreement to Allow Daycare Use Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to determine whether daycare use is appropriate for this property, and if so, adopt the attached amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd: 1/17/17 Complete: 1/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 3/18/17 3. Background. The applicant is requesting that the City amend the zoning provisions for the subject property to allow `daycare' as an allowed use for the property. In a separate application (#17-3899), Little Acorns Childcare currently operating in Long Lake has requested a Conditional Use Permit to operate a daycare in the existing building on the property. Please review the attached Planning Commission memo and exhibits. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Orono Planning Commission on 2/21/17 voted 6-0 on a motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement to allow `Daycare Use' as a Conditional Use for the property, subject to the following additional recommendations: - The amendment is for this property only. - Daycare should not be added as an allowed use in the B-6 district at this time. - The standard of 50 sq. ft. of outside play area per pupil that appears in Orono's B-1 and B-3 conditional use requirements for daycare, should not be included in the amendment text, since this standard conflicts with State licensing standards. Applicants should merely be subject to State licensing standards. The provision for 50 sq. ft. of outside play area appearing in the B-1 and B-3 District daycare standards should be eliminated. 5. Public Comments. No public comments were forthcoming at the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. Per the City's standard practice, all property owners within 350 feet of the property were notified of the hearing. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A draft amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement is attached for Council consideration and approval. Note the following: - The Amendment as drafted applies to Lot 1 which is the site of the existing building, with an allowance for ancillary facilities (outdoor recreation area) within the commons parking lot, Lot 6; this precludes the daycare use extending to the other 4 building lots. If Council desires, this can be amended to include other parcels within the 2060 overall site. - If Council desires, the amendment of the B-1 and B-3 Districts to remove the 50 sq. ft. outdoor play area requirement will be placed on the ongoing list of future code amendments Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ AGENDA ITEM 17-3898 March 13, 2017 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend and authorize execution of the attached First Amendment to Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract. List of Exhibits A — Draft First Amendment to PUD No. 2C Agreement B — Notice of PC Action 2/24/17 C — Draft PC Minutes of 2/21/17 D — Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 2/21/17 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ Council Exhibit A (Reserved for recording information) FIRST AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated , 2017, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and CBS -MN PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota Corporation (the "Developer"). 1. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The City and the Developer (as successor in interest to Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC) entered into a Development Agreement for AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE dated May 15, 2007, recorded June 11, 2007, with the Office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. 4395203 ("Development Agreement"). 2. REQUESTED AMENDMENT. The Developer has requested an amendment to the Development Agreement to allow `Daycare' as an allowed Conditional Use within the property. The only uses currently allowed by the Development Agreement are office condominium buildings limited to general office uses which may include business and professional offices of a general nature, and may include a clinic for human care on an outpatient basis only. Page I of 3 17-3898V1mpg3/7/17 3. CITY APPROVAL. Based on the recommendations of the Orono Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing held on February 21, 2017, and based on the information contained in staff reports, Planning Commission minutes and other documents which are of record in relation to Orono Zoning File 417-3898, the Orono City Council has granted approval for such First Amendment. 4. AMENDMENT. Paragraph 3.1 is hereby added to the Development Agreement to read as follows: 3.1 Conditional Uses. `Daycare facilities' shall be allowed as a conditional use within Lot 1 and with ancillary exterior facilities within Lot 6, subject to provisions established within a Conditional Use Permit which shall be applied for and obtained prior to occupancy, and subject to the minimum requirements of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, as may be amended. 5. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract was executed by the parties the day and year first above written. (SEAL) 17-3898V1mpg3/7/17 CITY OF ORONO BY: AND Page 2 of 3 Mayor City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017 by Dennis Walsh and by Anna Carlson, the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DEVELOPER: CBS -MN PROPERTIES, INC. WN STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -- _ day of , 2017 by , the of CBS -MN Properties, Inc, a Minnesota corporation, on its behalf. NOTARY PUBLIC Drafted by: City of Orono Page 3 of 3 17-3898V1mpg3/7/17 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 TO: Dale Richardson CBS -MN Properties P.O. Box 575 Long Lake, MN 55356 CommercialBuildineSery@live.com ZONING FILE: DATE OF NOTICE: Council Exhibit B 17-3898 March 1, 2017 COPIES: Little Acorns / Att. James Smale 1865 W. Wayzata Blvd., Suite 112 Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF REQUEST: Amend PUD No. 2C Agreement to Allow Daycare as a Conditional Use DATE OF MEETING: February 21, 2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement for 2060 Wayzata Boulevard to allow 'Daycare Use' as a Conditional Use for the property, subject to the following additional recommendations: 1. The amendment is for this property only. 2. Daycare should not be added as an allowed use in the B-6 district at this time. 3. The standard of 50 s.f. of outside play area per pupil that appears in Orono's B-1 and B-3 conditional use requirements for daycare, should not be included in the amendment text, since this standard conflicts with State licensing standards. Applicants should merely be subject to State licensing standards. The provision for 50 s.f. of outside play area appearing in the B-1 and B-3 District daycare standards should be eliminated. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, March 13, 2017 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at or 952.249.4622. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commissi Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Loren Schoenzeit. Representing Staff Planner :Michael Gaffron, City Planner Victoria Seals was present. Council Exhibit C on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: evin Landgraver, Bruce Lemke, Denise Leskinen, Chad Olson,,and e Community Development Director Jeremy Barnh , Senior Mel ie Curtis, and Recorder Jackie Young. Co it Member Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.mllowed by,*e-"Pledge of Allegiance. -NEW BUSINESS 1. APPR=Lemkeseconded, OMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 17, 2017 Landgraver m approve the minutes of the Orono Pl ning Commission 2. #17-3898 DALE RICHARDSON, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ORDINANCE/PUD TEXT AMENDMENT, 6:32 P.M. 6:51 P.M. Dale Richardson, Applicant, was present. Gaffron stated Dale Richardson of CBS-MNT Properties is the owner of the property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West. The site has five building pads and a common outlot. The applicant is requesting the City amend the zoning provisions for the subject property to allow daycare as an allowed use for the property. The impetus for the request is a separate application from Little Acorns Childcare, which currently operates in Long Lake. They have requested a conditional use permit to operate a daycare in the existing building on the property. Page 1 of 48 Ulla • I.I ORONO PLANNING COM31ISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. The property is zoned B-6 PUD. B-6 is an office/commercial district. The PUD on this property specifically allows for a small office condominium complex consisting of five buildings but does not allow any other types of uses. Because the PUD 2C Agreement functionally becomes the zoning for this property, an amendment of the Agreement is necessary for approval of a daycare use should the City Council choose to allow it. As a result, the applicant is requesting the City amend the Agreement to allow daycare as an allowed use for the property. From Staff's perspective, a B-6 District text amendment to allow daycare would not be necessary. The proposal to allow the daycare use should be evaluated against the goals of the Community Management Plan. The CMP guides the subject property for office use but the Comprehensive Plan suggests that the area west of the Orono Woods Senior Housing should be developed "with a mix of commercial uses, including retail, service and office components." Gaffron noted while this property is essentially guided for office use, the Comprehensive Plan suggests service uses would be appropriate; a daycare facility would be a service to the community. The character of the immediate neighborhood is varied. Some businesses along the Highway 12 corridor provide services to a sub -regional area, not necessarily specific to Long Lake and Orono, while other businesses are quite localized. The proposed daycare use is likely to be providing service to local residents and potentially to some smaller subset of commuters. In residential zoning districts where daycare is allowed, it requires a conditional use permit. Daycare is also allowed in the B-1 and B-3 districts as a conditional use. Little Acorns Childcare is looking to occupy the existing building on the site and remodel the interior. The building on Lot 2 to the immediate east consists merely of a foundation. The rest of the site has had extensive grading done on it in 2007-2008 in preparation for future office condo use. In other areas of the City where daycare is allowed, it is a conditional use. In residential districts where it is allowed there are no specific standards for a daycare other than it is to be a conditional use. In the commercial districts where `day nurseries' are allowed, the only condition is that not less than 50 square feet of outside play area per pupil be made available and that it be fenced. The applicants have proposed two outdoor play areas, one at the north end of the parking lot and another behind one of the building Page 2 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 ' Zq 6:30 o'clock p.m. pads. The primary intent of this part of the application is to determine whether daycare is appropriate for this site and then to define what conditions should be established for the use. One of the issues is the fact that the site contains five separate building sites. In discussions with the applicant and others over the past five or six years, it was noted that it is not likely the remainder of the site would be developed in the configuration as originally proposed. Gaffron stated in a perfect world there would be a comprehensive development plan for the site rather than a piecemeal approach. At the time of the original plan, one of the City Council's concerns at the time the property was being developed was that only one of the buildings would get built, rather than a complete timely buildout of the site. Unfortunately, the former has occurred. As it relates to parking, the original approvals for parking required 3.5 stalls per 1.000 square feet using 85 percent of the gross floor area, which was felt to be a realistic standard for the office condos. The site plan was approved with a parking layout that just meets the minimum with 102 stalls. The `Day nurseries' use under current code requires four stalls plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Based on that formula, a total of 15 parking stalls would be required. Gaffron stated the daycare will potentially take up more than one-fifth of the total parking on the site and will need to be reviewed as part of the Little Acorns CUP application. The parking area as constructed meets all required setbacks. The parking stalls have never been striped. By all indications, it also appears that the wear course of bituminous has never been installed. A backup apron was included at the end of the most northwesterly parking area. The site shares a driveway entrance to Wayzata Boulevard with the Orono Woods Senior Housing property. Original office condo approvals in 2007 and earlier took into account the lack of a direct, full - turning movement access to the site from Wayzata Boulevard due to the median and no turn lanes. At the time the senior housing project was approved, the City required a cross -access easement through the senior housing parking lot to allow direct access to and from Brown Road from this property. The current Hennepin County plans for improvements to Wayzata Boulevard will remove the median and insert an opposing left turn lane system. This will allow for full turning movements at the shared Page 3 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. driveway and will make access to the applicant's property much easier and less of a burden to the senior housing property. The Planning Commission and City Council should determine if the proposed daycare use is consistent with the Community Management Plan and/or the neighborhood. The Planning Commission should also discuss whether any specific conditions should be imposed to mitigate the impacts of the use. Planning Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the PUD No. 2C Agreement to allow a daycare use at this site. Staff does not recommend amending the allowed uses within the B-6 District to include daycare at this time. Thiesse asked whether discussion on this application should be limited to the PUD. Gaffron indicated that is correct. Gaffron stated Item No. 3 is regarding the conditional use permit request and that it would be very difficult to review a proposed use without having some sense of how the property will be used. Lemke asked if there is any issue with using the parking area to the east and having access through there. Gaffron stated when Amber Woods was developed, the City required an easement to allow traffic from the subject property to go through the senior housing parking lot. That easement has been in place for approximately 15 years. Lemke asked if going to the north towards the strip mall would be an option. Gaffron pointed out the location of the existing infrastructure in the area. Gaffron stated the initial intent was that the parking area could become a continuation of a road via outlots that exist through the Sugarwoods subdivision. The easement that was over the Otten Brothers property no longer exists. Gaffron stated the need to go west with the road is not an immediate need and it is possible there will never be a need for that. Gaffron stated the grade change makes that connection a little more difficult but not impossible. Page 4 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017; 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaf -ron noted the use of that area for a daycare play area would eliminate a few parking spaces. Lemke asked if the truck station would remain. Gaffron stated Staff has not received any indication that it would be eliminated. Dale Richardson, CBS -MN Properties, stated in his view the daycare is a good fit for the area and is not out of character with the rest of the area. Richardson stated they do have plans for the other parts of the property but that it is still a work in progress at this point. Richardson indicated there would likely be two buildings on the site or possibly one large building in addition to the existing structure. Gaffron pointed out the location of the existing structure. Richardson stated the one building is being contemplated as a medical building and that building would have parking below, which would compensate for any lost parking. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. Landgraver stated he tends to agree with Staff to amend the agreement as opposing to modifying the B-6 district. Landgraver stated some of the other developments going on in the City may create additional demand for daycare. Thiesse noted one option is not to change anything. Leskinen indicated she is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver. Lemke moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3848, Dale Richardson, 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West, granting of a PUD text amendment. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 5 of 48 Date Application Received: 1/17/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 1/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 3/29/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner February 21, 2017 #17-3898, Dale Richardson of CBS -MN Properties, 2060 Wayzata Boulevard - Amend B-6 District and/or PUD No. 2C Agreement to Allow Daycare Use - Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting that the City amend the zoning provisions for the subject property to allow `daycare' as an allowed use for the property. In a separate application (#17-3899), Little Acorns Childcare currently operating in Long Lake has requested a Conditional Use Permit to operate a daycare in the existing building on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the PUD No. 2C Agreement to allow a daycare use at this site. Staff does not recommend amending the allowed uses within the B-6 district to include daycare at this time. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Proposed Use Overview Exhibit C Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Building Interior Plans Exhibit E. Building Code Review for Daycare Use Exhibit F. Comp Plan and B-6 Zoning Code Excerpts Exhibit G. Resolution No. 5613 Exhibit H. PUD No. 2C Agreement & Development Contract Excerpts Exhibit 1. Wayzata Boulevard Improvement Plans Excerpt Exhibit J. Aerial Photos of Site Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map Council Exhibit D Background Dale Richardson of CBS -MN Properties, owner of the property, is applying for the necessary approvals to allow 'daycare' as an allowed use of the property. The impetus for this request is the companion application by Little Acorns Childcare, currently operating in the Long Lake Town Center but looking to continue operating in a new location in the Long Lake — Orono area. With approval of the daycare use, Little Acorns would relocate to this site. The property is zoned B-6 PUD, and is governed by the Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract (see Exhibit H) and Resolution No. 5613 which granted General Development Plan and Final Plat Approval in 2007. The only approved use of the site is for a small office condominium complex of five buildings, of which only one was ever completed. #17-3898 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 2 The property remains in E. partially developed state, containing the initial building, a foundation for a second building, and 3 vacant lots. Site grading, parking lot and utilities were substantially completed by the original developer in 2007-2008 but little additional activity has occurred on the site since 2009. Comprehensive Plan Considerations The Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) in Map 38-6: Land Use Plan, guides the property at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard for "Office" use, while the CMP text suggests that the area west of the Orono Woods Senior Housing "should be developed with a mix of commercial uses including retail, service and office components" (CMP Part 3B, Land Use Plan, Urban Commercial Land Use, Orono/Long Lake Commercial Area, Pages 38-40). The only other properties within the Highway 12 corridor guided for 'office' use are the Service 800 building and the four parcels south of Kelley parkway between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. The Orono CMP does not (and probably should not) provide the level of detail as to what specific uses are considered as "office" or "service". Daycare uses are commonly found in office settings as well as in retail, residential and institutional settings. Zoning Considerations Daycare is not a permitted or conditional use within the underlying B-6 Highway Commercial Zoning District, and is not a permitted or otherwise allowed use per the provisions of the PUD 2C Agreement. Because the PUD 2C Agreement functionally becomes the zoning for this property, an amendment of the Agreement at minimum is necessary for approval of a daycare use should the City Council choose to allow it. While it could be argued that the underlying B-6 district standards could undergo a text amendment to allow daycare, such an amendment would be applicable to all other properties zoned B-6 in Orono. The number of such properties is fairly small, however, consisting only of the Otten Brothers Nursery site and the three undeveloped commercial lots along the south side of Kelley Parkway, plus the medical/dental office building across from City Hall. in the residential zoning districts where daycare is an allowed use, it is a conditional use. Those districts include R -1A, R -IB, LR -1A, LR -1B, LR -1C, LR -1C-1, RR -1A and RR -1B. The code provisions for a daycare conditional use within each of these districts are listed as follows: "Within any (R -1A, etc.) one -family residential district, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: Schools, daycare centers, uses accessory to a high school: a. Pre -kindergarten, primary and secondary public schools and private schools with a curriculum similar to a pre -kindergarten, primary or secondary school. Schools may include before and after school care for students. b. Daycare centers, nursery schools and similar programs that are not associated with a public or private school and serve pre -kindergarten children." Daycare is also allowed in just two of Orono's business districts (again as a conditional use) including B-1 and B-3. The provisions are slightly different for these two districts: "Within the (B-1, B-3) business district, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses without a conditional use permit: "Day nurseries, provided not less than 50 square feet of outside play area per pupil is available and fenced." #17-3898 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 3 The primary intent of this review is to determine whether a daycare use is appropriate for this site at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard, and if so, deme what general conditions should be established for that use. Adding a bit of complexity to the issue is that this site contains 5 separate building pad tax parcels as well as the common parking lot which serves each of the five pads. In discussions with the applicant recently and with others over the past five years, the likelihood of the remaining four pads being developed for office condominium use as platted is relatively low. There appears to be greater interest in developing the east half of the site for some type of multi -family residential use. How that would interact with the proposed daycare use is unclear. A comprehensive development plan for this site would be preferable to the piece -meal approach we are faced with. Optional Approaches to Zoning. if the Council determines that a daycare use falls within the broad definition or scope of 'office use', and further determines that a daycare use is within the scope of a `service use', then neither a CMP map amendment nor CMP text amendment are necessary. However, if the Council determines that a daycare use does not fall within the scope of office or service uses, then a CMP map & text amendment would be required. In either of the above scenarios, at a minimum an amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement will be required in order to allow the daycare use at this site, since the existing Agreement is quite specific as to allowing only the 'office condo' use.. If it is determined that daycare would be appropriate generally within the B-6 District, then a companion text amendment to the B-6 zoning code should be considered. Site Plan Considerations Site planning for the specific requested daycare use for this property will be considered in the review of the companion application #17-3899 by Little Acorns. However, a number of site planning considerations pertinent to any use of this site will be addressed here. Parking Requirements. The original approvals for parking for this site recognized that while the Zoning Ordinance requires 1 stall for every 200 s.f. of floor area for all professional office uses, this number may have been excessive for the anticipated office condo use. The term "floor area" for the purpose of calculating the number of off-street parking spaces is the net usable floor area of the various floors, devoted to retail sales, services, office spaces, processing and fabrication, exclusive of hallways, utility space and storage areas other than warehousing. For office buildings the City has generally considered the net "floor area" for parking calculation to be 85% of gross floor area. For the original approvals, after consulting with the City Engineer and the City's planning consultant, it was determined that a parking requirement of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 s.f. (1 stall per 286 s.f.) using 85% of the gross floor area, was a more realistic standard for the office condos. This would balance the need to provide adequate parking completely within the site, while eliminating unnecessary hardcover. Council accepted this formula and it was used in the approvals for the office condo project, requiring 101 stalls for the anticipated 34,000 gross s.f. of office space (34,000 sf x 0.85) / 286 sf =101 stalls. The site plan was approved with a parking layout that just meets the minimum with 102 stalls. For uses other than office, parking requirements vary considerably. Per section 78-1516, "day nurseries" require four stalls plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Retail sales and service establishments require at least one stall for each 150 square feet of net floor area. Restaurants require at least one stall for each 80 square feet of public floor area. The available parking at this site is a limiting factor in the types of uses possible. How the proposed daycare use impacts this is addressed in the CUP application memo (17-3899). #17-3898 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 4 Parking Layout. The parking areas as constructed meet all required setbacks. The parking stalls have never been striped, so reference to the site plan is necessary. By all indications it also appears that the wear course of bituminous has never been installed. A back-up apron was included at the end of the most northwesterly parking area. This provides a necessary function for this dead-end lot, and was located so as to be usable for a potential future service road connection to the west. While such a connection is immediately unlikely, easements for a through -route for a traffic connection between Brown Road and Willow Drive were required in past approvals for this site, but were never granted as the original developer defaulted. Establishment of a play area as proposed within the northerly six stalls of the lot would at least temporarily preclude the possibility of a future connection and negate the backup apron at the north end. This will be discussed further with the CUP review. Site Vehicular Access. The site shares a driveway entrance to Wayzata Boulevard with the Orono Woods Senior Housing property. Original office condo approvals in 2007 and earlier took into account the lack of a direct full -turning -movement access to the site from Wayzata Boulevard, due to the in-place median and no turn lanes. To this end, when the Senior Housing project was approved in 2001, the City required a cross -access easement through the Senior Housing parking lot to allow direct access to/from Brown Road from the 2060 parcel. The current plans for Hennepin County improvements to Wayzata Boulevard will remove the median and insert an opposing left turn lane system, allowing full turning movements at the shared driveway. This will make access to the applicants' property much easier and less of a burden to the Senior Housing. Site Topography, Stormwater Management. This site was extensively re -graded to create a rear walkout situation for each of the 5 building pads. The regrading included substantial boulder retaining walls and a storm sewer system in the parking lot and at the walkout level, connecting to the Senior Housing storm sewers and eventually discharging to the stormwater pond in the NW quadrant of Brown Road and Wayzata Boulevard. The office condo developer completed required expansions to this pond to accommodate all drainage from the 2060 property, hence no on-site stormwater ponding is required. Analysis The proposal to allow the daycare use should be evaluated against the goals of the Community Management Plan. The CMP maps the subject property for office use, but guides it for "a mix of commercial uses including retail, service and office components". Daycare is certainly a service that is vital to the community. Sandwiched between a multi -family senior housing development and a retail/service mall with a minor office component, the daycare use may be an appropriate use for this site. In addition to evaluating a proposal against the CMP, the character of the existing neighborhood is often used. The current use, CMP guidance, and zoning of adjacent parcels is: The character of the immediate neighborhood is varied. Some businesses in the Highway 12 corridor provide services to a sub -regional area, not necessarily specific to Long Lake and Orono, while others are quite localized. The proposed daycare use is likely to be providing service to local residents and potentially to some smaller subset of commuters. Use CMP Zoning North ! Single Family Residential Residential R -1A PRD South Trucking Operation Commercial ' B-1 East Multi -Family Senior Housing Residential RPUD West Commercial Strip Mall Commercial B-1 The character of the immediate neighborhood is varied. Some businesses in the Highway 12 corridor provide services to a sub -regional area, not necessarily specific to Long Lake and Orono, while others are quite localized. The proposed daycare use is likely to be providing service to local residents and potentially to some smaller subset of commuters. #17-3898 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 5 The Planning Commission and City Council should determine if the proposed daycare use is consistent with the Community Management Plan and/or the neighborhood. Public Comments No comments for or against the proposal have been received to date. Issues for Consideration 1. Would the daycare use be consistent with the goals of the Community Management Plan? 2. Is the proposed use appropriate for the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose specific conditions in order to mitigate the impacts of the use? (To be reviewed further with the CUP application) 4. If daycare is appropriate for this property, is it appropriate for other B-6 properties? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation The daycare use at some operational level would in the opinion of staff be a reasonable use for this site. There are specific details of how that use operates which should be reviewed as part of the companion CUP application. Planning Department staff recommends approval of an amendment to the PUD No. 2C Agreement to allow 'daycare use' as a Conditional Use at this property, establishing a basis for consideration of the companion CUP application. Staff does not recommend amending the allowed uses within the B-6 district to include daycare at this time. City of Orono Amendment Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan / $ Ordinance Text / ❑ Zoning Change (check one) street address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Application ail , Date Received Staff Fee $700 Escrow $700 Notes Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 2060 Wayzata Blvd., Orono, MN 55356 APPLICANT INFORMATION: )(check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Dale Richardson Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: P.O. Box 575 City: Lono Lake ZIP: 55356 Email: Commercial Buildin Sery live.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑ check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 13check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: BS - P � s Phone (Primary): 612-708-6085 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 575 _ City: Long Lake ZIP: MN Email: CommercialBuildin Sery live.com APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: PC Exhibit A Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. w Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant andlor property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantlowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distrit Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Amendment Application - January 2017 Page 4 Date: Date: Date: Z2 Date: RECEIVED JAN 1 7 2017 3898 CITY OF ORONO Adjacent Property Owners West Property Line: Owner: Orono Station West LIc ORONO STATION WEST LLC Taxpayer 2160 W WAYZATA BLVD ORONO MN 55356 East Property Line: Owner: Orono Hsg & Rdvlpt Athy ORONO HSG & RDVLPT ATHY Taxpayer: 2040 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE MN 55356 South Property Line: Wayzata Blvd. North Property Line: 1. Owner: Sugar Woods Homeowners Assoc SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC Taxpayer C/O FRANK PINGTENS 2007 SUGARWOODS OR ORONO MN 55356 2. Owner. P Antonenko & E Antonenko PAUL D ANTONENKO Taxpayer, ELIZABETH R ANTONENKO 2104 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 3. Owner: R M Schommer & E M Schommer R M SCHOMMER & E M Taxpayer SCHOMMER 2106 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 2060 Wayzata Blvd Orono, MN 55356 4. Owner: M L Ricks & J M Ricks MICHAEL U/JACQUELiNE M Taxpayer RICKS 2906 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 S. Owner. G E Mileusnlc & M Mileusnic GEORGE E & MARILYN Taxpayer MILEUSNIC 2110 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO 2060 Wayzata Blvd Property - Legal Description Site: 1.91 acres 83,099 sq ft Torrens/Abstract• Torrens Addition: Amber Woods Office Centre Lot- 006 Block: 001 Relevent PID: 0.14 acres 6,242 sq ft Torrens/Abstract- Torrens Addition: Amber Woods Office Centre Lot. 001 Block: 001 # 3898, RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO Custom Building Service LLC PO Box 575 Long Lake MN 55356 612-708-6085 Intent of project is to keep a local business in Town Narrative For 2060 Wayzata Blvd Propose to convert existing building that has been vacant to daycare Tenant Little Acorn Building size 7350 SF Hours of operation 7AM- 7PM Project to be complete by 4/15/2017 Total employees 20 Capacity up to 95 children 45 of which are infants PC Exhibit B Traffic up to 75 families of which is staggered through the day usually up to 4 drop offs at a time but no large rushes. This will include 2 play areas 1500 ft each one will be in parking area NW property one will be in low sheltered area NE We expect very little noise as we have a large buffer to the north and the elevation to the north east is lower by a 12ft wall This project will not produce any odors JAN 17 2017 3898 CRYOFOROWO I Z 1ty 17- \(�tY-101 6 9w_1 21A ! \ W. 2,0�101� — - \ 1024 '0!RCEncN AND INVERT _ 'ARE IJIJKNOINN, T~`��. $ a `ted e w c y 10 2s � 9 1020 � � 4 ,018 13% ii a •: 1 o tons, 9°a 44' / �A� a .r � \ .la7s 9YYvt010. BW`1 12.4 p0\ za>< ,, =1 1 R ASEMEWV 1009,$0 Ik O, , 10, 4 1016 TW -1011.0/ 't \ 1 20 1018 o AMBER WOODS n a � r' � CC 106, TW. nt D 1D �4 2 Tw-rat 4� a1n 2 4 �,�/ �`, O�F�CL ����� 44s, I ! / k` J .._. _• - ,JAN 1720 PC Exhibit C �y ti W. \ \ \ ORONO, MINNESOTA 1.20 1 /✓ O�E _� � !Olr7 ` �� I \ � \ caner �!`�� INTERSPACE WEF INC. TE -10115.80 0` 1 . \ \ ~--x GINACARLS& 3ASEMENT-1008.20 \ \ !O ` \ \ \ \ \ WAYPZOATBAO� 53391 FFE- 1018. 0 ENl mr• 1 ` \ \ 4 lam" BASEMT;;?q0�.l?0 ++ o,ac° Hca- 1 • \ �` 'ti \ s QA 13. -14 I I �� a,i �'o� f �'� I Mc —10110 I p4 oa tr \� D�� 1 'n,!-4 I - I p 4 1 I�ISSOCIIATES ,off r ` raso,rrarey�.m,r,00 jrCAM 2'- / O.GOA,wM'ee4M -1 72. .\ 1°,4,°n 1 4" �`r ma ` f I. .^ r� •raves. w.r�braw.� t;lA5 DUMP a ` ys9�5.A° LVa 012. �" EN4 S w. 012 f ti rz / nM�sr,yren�y. M1 -1015 '� = 018 � t1 r r�ear�:ai rraa am.Yawbo.r =1 a, EMENT.1005L4 � -- 1 Wr• 11. — —_ „ti ew=14 1.4 � � . � •n" � I�fC `l/r �� Suhmtlta; 4-: a — r •n,ra O O *Cgs e ' I END OF WALL i2 I 2q �V V 2 7/� r -/ j rnWaA�e pW / ew-1011.0 0 j / FFE�10121Q/ 1 0 EX. f3lFIE01NG-eA ° ""�'°� -- `;� 0 i 8 BASEIAENT=1001.50 / c acv i `i" µ � 1 �• ona 51 na-anwr..�rcn„ar.ee .29 r 0 I OrQ Us,mato s I Zsw,°.�."a..,�aeea'"STM 4100 A �• . 'c BENCHMARK ) r X a°rs e 4 \ r T l r< % .-qw>. n Fgwrm;F-- ~ Top Nut Of H dront 10°'"' l --- - y r �os7.,4 � ,p07.a, ` i00,� f --- L.. r°°a 7o P , 0014 NORTH Eley = Ial1.4 Feet � ~ � � _ 1 4 � � . >�3tiw Ex Eil°E 1oo7.afiE'f0`- a 1°°981 iou6.� i' j � PLAN �""" _ f ! 1, sm� 0 20 40 rURAE Bd9R 79 a> i C" ewu►+Yr `µwar f I� E Otn 1 °�' »__. I �c 6 ruungss I f ��'� � _ ua s�w� _ 'l aaec 00 N r "uuysansmva f oY giN SCA _ `� .4. I° • , ^ 7.B8x Q r �> s ftruNcan°c�YF � f - 7a8 FEET .` 100 f tvr ftE °�i as a• � � f�i � � u•, c�r�eouw SEE SHM 0-8 FOR GRAVING NDT>;3 AND r.SG1HSD -•� _`� e 10— GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN WEST 04178 - :iF�: ki•i i � 'i JAN 17 2017 CITY I PC Exhibit D �_.° `eo L.r V �y 4� v.� Ad r\ JAN 17 2017 CITY I PC Exhibit D 4� v.� Ad r\ pn C'> f Ln T - UARrs DEsiGN LLL rL Aj -t) W Q RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OR ORONO a uCP P• =DEIGN OPPepnI.G«.. wl w.• JAN 17 2017 8CITY OF ORONO 3 9 8 HART'S D88IGN (MM 028 Mon - JAN 17 2017 8CITY OF ORONO 3 9 8 PC Exhibit E November 22, 2016 Re: Building Code Review for Daycare Occupancies 2060 Wayzata Blvd, Orono, MN Mohagen Hansen Project No.: 16403.003S This document will providea basic code review for the building located at 2060 Wayzata Blvd, Orono, MN. This code review will be focused on providing the requirements for an occupancy for a Day Care within the Minnesota State Building Code 2015 and the MN State Fire Code 2015. This review does not include the MN Chapter 9503 Child Care Center Licensing. Basic Building Current lnformatiQn: 1. Occupancy: B (Business) 2. Building Construction Type: Type V -B 3. Stories: 1 with a Mezzanine and Basement 4. Square Feet per Floor: Basement Level' 1563 SF; Main Level: 1546 SF; Mezzanine: 749 SF 5. Sprinkled Fully Sprinkled, NFPA 13 6. Exiting 2 exits, one on main level and one on basement level Day CareRevie 1. Occupancy Classification Table 302.2 a. More than 5 children under 2.5 years of age without exit on level of classrooms: 1-4 i. Mezzanine level: 1-4 occupancy not allowed by item #14 b. More than 5 but less than 100 children less than 2.5 years on level of exit: i. Main level or Basement level: E occupancy with direct access out of classroom. Exit doors need to be added. c. More than5 children greater than 2.5 years: E L Main level or Basement level: E occupancy, no additional exiting required ii. Mezzanine level: E occupancy if exit door is added. 2. Table 503 Building Height and Size: E Allowable: 1stories and 9,500SF per floor Provided: 2 stories and approx.. 1600 SF or less per floor 3. 504.2 Automatic sprinkler system increase. a. Allowable stories increased by one story. 4. Table 803.9 Interior Finish Requirements for Flame Spreads Group E: Exits - Group B Corridors, Rooms = Group C Flame spread for C: 76-200 Smoke Development Index: 0-450 5. 906 Fire Extinguisher: to be located a maximum travel distance of 75'-0" 6. Table 1004.1.4 Maximum floor area per occupant: cls Group E: Day care:35 - any classroom over 1,715 SF needs two exits 7. 1008.1.10: Panic Hardware: Group E: is Required, JAN 17 2017 8. 1009 Stairways I Nll TC.' %a ?alts C3111T Dive I 31tE 290, �'Vaprasa, r"'; -': r 3898 CITY OF ORONO 20601Hayzata Blvd: Day Care Code Review November 18, 2016 Page Two 1009.3 Exit Access Stair: Floor Enclosure Exception 1: Stairways serving only two stories. (does not include mezzanine) — not required to be enclosed. 9. Table 1014.3 Common Path of Egress Travel: a. E occupancy= 75'-0": Main level and Basement Level complies. b. B occupancy -100': Mezzanine level complies 10. Table 1016.2 Exit Access Travel Distance: Group E: 250'-0" 11. 1018 Corridors: Both Group E: Corridors not required to be fire rated if the building is fully sprinkled. 12. 1018.4 Dead End Corridors Group E: 50'-0" if sprinkled 13. 1018.2 Corridor Width required Group E: 72" if occupant load is over 100. Building complies 14. Table 1021.2 Stories with one exit or access to one exit a. 1-4 not allowed on Mezzanine level with only one exit. b. Main Level: 75'to exit: Building complies c. Basement Level: 75' to exit: Building complies 15. 1104 Accessible Route a. Basement Level: if path to exterior door is accessible (1:20 ramp) then floor complies. if accessible exterior path does not exist then a lift (LULA) is required from Main level to Basement level. b. Main Level: if no stairs to the main entry then this level complies with code.. c. Mezzanine Level: If this level is less than 30 occupants then this level complies. No lift or elevator needed 16. Table 2902.1 Plumbing fixture count Group E Water Closets: 1 per 50 occupants Lavatories: 1 per 50 occupants Drinking Fountain 1 per 100 occupants Service Sink 1 a. Restrooms need to be located on accessible routs; therefor the Main level will need to add restrooms b. 2902.3.2: Accessible restrooms need to be within one floor and 500' of a space. If restroom are added to Main level, then Mezzanine level will comply with this code. Additional basic information fro N Chap. 950 1. Outdoor play area: min. 1,500 SF, fenced off.: 2. Electrical outlets to be tamper proof. 3. Large muscle activity area needed 4. One handwashing sink and water closet for every 15 students Further Discussion 1. Rooms with Children 2.5 years and younger need a direct exit door out. 2. Restroom fixture count 3. Food Prep Area location MOHAGEN HANSEN Architecture I Interiors Jennifer Kaplan, AIA Architect MDHAGEN HANSEN Architecture I Interiors JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO X\Jobs\2060 Wayzata-Bdvd-16403101 Admin\ Code\16403_CodeReuiero Daycare.docx rm CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan 4A- `-' PC Exhibit F properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among the making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a le in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second of development is typically residential; hence the business uses in many c s are in close proximity to individual homes. Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identifie a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to ome: 1) High traffic volumes and the existing traffic m ement infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestri have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and de facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to th ovation and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cro CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2) Parking availability is a limiting facr expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3) Beautification efforts/arehined by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as ftraints. 4) Aging buildings are rielopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local busineve and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5) There/ilhity are tectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. Navahasn't ided whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the streetthe rear) or suburban (buildings set back, parking at the front)er. 6) Compcertain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighn become an issue. 7) E anion of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to akota Rail Trail. 8) / Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL AREA. An additional commercial area is designated along Old Highway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-38 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than `big box' regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally -owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian -friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. The commercial areas along Wayzata Boulevard within Orono are identified in Map 3B-7 and include the following: 1. Property abutting the north side of Wayzata Boulevard from Brown Road North to Willow Drive. This area was reviewed as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1989, resulting in a guide plan calling for commercial uses abutting Wayzata Boulevard with primary access to a service road connecting from Brown Road to Willow Drive, and elimination of direct access to Highway 12. The area is currently bounded on the north by existing residential development at densities ranging from 1 unit per 2 acres to 1 unit per 1.3 acres. The western half of this area has since been developed via PUD as a nursery/garden center with included leasable commercial spaces. The east half of this area includes, a 10,000 st office building, a strip shopping center, a small quasi -industrial machine shop operation, an office - condominium development, and a 62 -unit senior independent living apartment building. The City Council in February 1998 adopted a General Concept Plan for development along Wayzata Boulevard indicating that the Council's vision includes community scale retail development (as opposed to regional or `big box' scale development) focused in a more compact area in or near downtown Long Lake (closer to Brown Road than to Willow Drive, at least in the short term) for the following reasons: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-39 CMP Part 3B. Land. Use Plan Focuses on downtown Long Lake remaining a strong retail area, and helps preserve owner -operated small service businesses in Long Lake which are vital to Orono and Long Lake residents. 2. Focuses on maintaining a vital downtown and "sense of place" for both Long Lake and Orono. 3. A compact retail area encourages pedestrian activity. 4. It is easier to plan, coordinate and control the development of a more compact retail area than an extended retail strip, 5. Focusing development toward Brown Road could strengthen the ability to obtain desirable development on the north side of Wayzata Boulevard east of the Otten Brothers Nursery. 6. Enables better control over the amount of retail development that occurs along Wayzata Boulevard. 7. Provides the opportunity to generate stable jobs in office, high tech, medical, etc. 8. A more compact community scale retail arca matches the design of new Highway 12 with no interchanges through Long Lake. 9. Limits the impact on north/south roadways (i.e. increased traffic and activity levels) as compared to the more intense "big box" retail uses. 10. Maintains a lower activity level in the area west of Willow Ihive. 11. Would create less pressure for providing an access from new Highway 12 to the retail area. Orono's 2000-2020 CMP reguided the easterly 4 acres of this area to allow for development of senior housing. The remainder of this area should be developed with a mix of commercial uses including retail, service and office components. Access via a service road paralleling Wayzata Boulevard is still desirable rather than direct access to Wayzata Boulevard, since traffic levels are expected to again creep upward, and the long-term need for a service road may again manifest itself. For this reason, it is in the best interests of the City and the business community to preserve at least a partial service road corridor between Brown Road and Willow for future use which will provide all properties with access options other than direct access from Wayzata Boulevard. The City supports the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B40 GMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan development of a "mid -point" connection to Wayzata Boulevard directly across from Brimhall Avenue or Shaughnessy Avenue, such access to be at least a right -in, right -out configuration. Further, if and when the service road is constructed, all other existing accesses directly to Highway 12 should ultimately be removed. 2. Property abutting the north side of Highway 12 from Mow Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road. As part of the 1989 Co prehensive Plan amendment, the City guided the portion of this area ' ectly adjacent to the north side of Highway 12 for commercial deve pment. At that time, the City was not clear about the type of co cial development that should be planned for this area. The 2000-202 CMP further refined the intent for this area, establishing that the optim development in this area would be office development. Office develo ent can provide services for Orono residents, can provide facilities f businesses owned by Orono residents, and can provide quality ployment opportunities. The development of this area for office se versus retail use enables the Wayzata Boulevard retail area to . a more compact pedestrian - friendly retail area versus a no -cohesive extended strip of retail development. The City's intent ' to have a single tier of office uses between Kelley Parkway and ayzata Boulevard, with residential uses north of Kelley Parkway. Parameters for commercial a of this area are as follows: 1. The area affect is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulev d, west of Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. Allowed u es in this area include professional offices, limited service u s, and retail uses accessory to the office use. 3. Acces to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway. Direct access to Will Drive, if allowed, shall be right-inhight-out only. There shaJybe no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. 4. `Aig box" retail uses will not be allowed within this area. CONENIERCL&L LAND USE Lake ac ess and lake user service businesses are appropriate for I lakeside CommiyditY and require a lakeshore location. Special performance standards are neces ary to assure protection of the lake environment and protection of neigKboring properties. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-41 § 2 } 2 [ CD � / � � � I k \ b \ k ± e e e « R 46 CL C=) S ) ] k § S 2 \ O 0 m m w Ls F N flj v a C d a d m O N u �0 A wN yU 7 tT 7 � N � � o m a R . ami N '� '� r o w 'a m p °,F' v b br R ui m o vi m 6u o n° ,r In N o y o r cm w £' u a m a Y v c Qo u m c m r m R a.7 G dv u o `m a R ll Vl V1 C D LL l!1 Ln 2' LL V] 0: O O N N W .J i LA R � V a �ti 'O to U 'O a .... v Ln LJ43 o o Y c ro� c O R C L y-13 = C v c m \ rip h b iri 0 O 0 a L N O C CS a 3 u o C R W L R U 7 �0, S Ccdu t a 'k n 0 v \ / ] re « w ¥¥ ui 3 w 06 «§ IL E \ � S ; ; �T7 'ai E k} 8 tCL § 8 t rL *$ 0 e % « 0 . K � . m 0 ; 7 2 | § t ƒ t $ 2 k k \ � $ 2 k 40-1o t » 2 CD 0 $ \CL 2 7 $ 0 N § 0 \ ( 0 k ( % w k . � $ h . I \ k $ § K k § k § § a C rq \ § c 8 a / 8 0 0 - 0 c C) k )« ) @ ¥ r B : a k 0 0 2 o R q > R ¢ a ] re « w ¥¥ ui 3 w 06 «§ IL N G r — b0 - v O N V i m L C ai r U Q1 ° C w n L +' ? r .'�+ N O E m R O y O cm c aLN 3 in `° m w o w m o c K w° ami G o 0a •� O E a L 7 A •� ba N m O a� r E d y C n d A !�_ E m12 c vui V,= w Y r w m 3 € 'Y s u u ° c t' w °G° a m N� u m Y o E a m m° u x °' N E a, r "E r d m m as m s E �, c to a c o r °' m m G o0 3 0 o �L N o o o w ab o E u ?+ o° w o c g y `" G as _ w a w y C 'N o Q 7 w a 6 O_ C >. m o- O G ad+ x ar E o a Q o a r m w i ° a ba R D a r vi u b R Eo c L m N L° v 'm' a 'S m Q c c a° a o u c c a a a Y o G Y m = c o f m m o b $I�rcu r ° C L m i 4; c u E yaa+ n m F 1 o °- � y •1-C, n a rm, m o 3 YO G V r_ ° C a m u m 7 C ° w Q y r 7� L ] m W 7 aJ E q .3 � E c L v w v a w Y 0. Y o o aj E m m a' y Lm. EF a m o o n a 5 i ep ° m o a E u m —y W y a t m o a m S' °no m L m o a° 5 ° o a E m o � E w Lal y p m ° d m v n m aci O Y ar+ C u O al � _m ° a r N O da > O p G y G ami m '= d 'mo y ami L N C C o N O A 2 of o C E a m �+' u t m e v C o m R �o GG w E � r m m 5 m ° L O E W C Y $ c ° n u a; o a c 0 m u b N c o a, R m c w w 8 Y� E t u G is a m m u y£ Z' w ° > 'o ,� o aXi r L a' >> a d E Y u y o dF L Y Q C w m w W O Y N °° L a Lm 3 —��, R .� o �—° a d0 a' ° o "6 b L a7 cL W C O a! ,' N G G N eLq c G G 3 ea , a p E° och c `a n m G N =^ a ° ari ?, C m ° L aU �m- •a+ N u bGO C Lw�. .tCO G 7 dcC O-0 dj ° QdE bTy C N oo .0 = a a m .mm G La}) ' o u Ln mar. u- E N 0 m a E E C E m m m m r m L N N d N 7 O a U v a� a Q. v n, aJ c 0 0a yY N 0 G v c .y N a Z a Q_ O a a 0 Q E 0 v n mm 0 L 0 m N E R a m O v a u a v d m r 'u a! r G ho E O_ y N i 0 E d 3 6 N Fl ƒ k v I k ra E � ƒ R f « a { [ \ / \ - t lu r EL & ! x § � � E � k \ 7 - B � k § k aj _ \ j { } \ \ \LU 2 ba \ § E m. / k ) 46 f f § m { 2 ( 2 « ) _ CL a = ) ] { 0 % E a & 2 - § m / \ { (_ § - § W � (/ k $& j k ] A 4$§\ k \ G § / \ { [ \ / \ ■ ; CL k CL \ j ( li \ \ k \ 2 ) ] d S % ) k lu � � E � k 7 - B � { ) aj _ 2 # \LU 2 m 46 f f § { \ ) ( 2 \ ) 5 CL ) ) / % E a & 2 - a k (ea § � § W f (/ k & ■ ; CL k CL \ j ( li \ \ k \ 2 ) ] d S % ) k Jill 9 All I IN I yo I I R.W. I 1=0 Dt Uronc innesinta :40 WI -I are am":-Xw`F-i f:jdIr-*T-jTI 0 �I = I V _ ara�er r i I A. Bridgewater Dr B. Boulder Dr C. Sandstone La D. Stonebay Dr E. Cascade la F. Sandstone Ct G. Cobblestone Ct o, °moo City of Orono ZONING MAP ZONING DISTRICTS Rural Residential Business F B2- Lakeshore RRA RR -1A- One Fan:,ly Rural Residential - 5Acres 81 - Retail Sales = RB -One Family Rural Residential - 2 Acres C; f Lakeshore Residential L__ B3 -Shopping Center r= LR -1A -One Family Lakeshore Residential .2 Acres 134 - Office/professional Lr--' LR -18 -One Family Lakeshore ResideM!a) -1 Acre BS -Limited Neighborhood LRAC - One Family Lakeshore Residential -112 Acre BO -Highway Commercial W LR1C-1 - One Fami,y Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict -112 Acre B$ PUD - Highway Commercial PUD R I Industrial = I - Industdal R -1A -One Family Residential -1 Acre ' Recreational R-1 B - One Family Residential -112 Acre j- Plumed Unit Development RS -Seasonal Recreational RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development RR -18 PUD L� PRD - Planned Res dential Development The Zoning Designations on this map are a representation of a combination of maps, Other ordinanances and City Code requirements which make up the complete City of Orono Parcel Boundary Q Zoning Regulations. Information on Planned Development is available at City Hall. Air Zoning requirements and Zoning designations on specific properties are subject to change. Section Boundary Water Bod y For updated Zoning information, please contact the City of Orono Planning &Zoning Department at planning@cLorono.mn.us or call (952) 249-462D. City B dart' This map reflects all valid Zoning amendments up to and Including Ordinance No. 60, Series, adopted May 11, 2009. I 62'a CIea:6r I '' 7er�;:_:nCourtyTax-eve~^ INSEE- 1 DR a Rf�s1Cr LLEY PRw c - RR -76 -mow- INSET 2 ers!'neuf.=E-ce''=:z Miles _ 1 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 F et_ = � 3000 1500 -30, MARCH 2011 I CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE SI TUNCIL NO. _ -- A RESOLUTION GRANTING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C FOR AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE LLC AND APPROVING -THE FINAL PLAT OF AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE AND VACATING EXISTING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS FILE 907--3250 K Exhibit G WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the lays of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council" j has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of laud within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application by Amber Woods Office Center LLC, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the "Applicant") for subdivision and development by the Planned Unit Development process of property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Orono Ammar, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5585 - granting Genaral Concept Plan Approval for Plmed Unit Development No. 2C, and on Man h 26, 2407 the City Coummoil adopted Resolution No. 5512 granting Preliminary Plat Approval for the plat of Amber Woods Office Centre, which approvals include the following elements: - 1. Subdivision platting of Lot 1, Block I, Orono Ambar to create five (5) biWding lots and one (1) common lot to be known as AMBER WOODS OFFICE CEIgM; 2. Commercial site plan approval and conditions for proposed development of office condominiums; 3. Vacation of existing easements; and CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL No, i WHEREAS, the Applicant has agreed to execute Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract providing for the installation of certain improvements as a condition of site plan approval for the construction of office condominiums on the Property, and which agreement documents the general and detailed conditions for use and development of the Property and replaces previously approved PUD Agreement No 2A; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has agreed to execute cross ingress and egress easements through the Property and through the adjacent Orono Senior Housing property with the City of Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority, to allow for f move vehicular connections at the northwestern corner of the Property for a future frontage road to Outlot D, Sugarwoods, and to the adjacent parcel at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard West; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements of Concept Plan Approval Resolution No. 5585. 2. Dedication on the plat of a Drainage and Utility Easement over entire Lot 6 (otherwise known as the common lot). 3. Submittal of Mimchaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit approving the grading and stormwater management facilities plan for development of the Property as proposed per the "Removal Plan", shoot Cl -2; the "Grading & Drainage flan West'; sheet 0-1; the "Grading, Drainage & SWPP .Plan ('East)", sheet C3-2; the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Sheet C3-3; and the "Utility Plan" sheet 4-1; all subject to review and final approval by the City Engineer; 4. Payment to the City of the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for the development of the Property in the amount of $19,342.84 based on a Trunk Fee of $7,320 per acre and gross acreage of Property at 114,868 s.f. or 2.637 acres including portions subject to trail and sidewalk easements. 5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat documents, Agreements, easements and covenants in the amount of $280.00 plus incurred review and filing costs. 6. Payment of the final plat review fee in the amount of $250.00 plus incurred legal and engineering charges. CITY of 080N0 RESOLUTION OF IgE �CITY COUNCIL Na. I Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements gently affecting the Property. WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this PUD and subdivision application and hereby specify approval of each attached plan and identify them as part of the official record for Planned Unit Development No. 2C. A. Final Plat B. Cover sheet CO -1 elated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheet Cl -1 dated 4-2-07 D. Rem mals & Erosion Control Plan sheet Cl -2 slated 4-2-07 E. Site Plan sheet C2-1 dated 4-2-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet C3.1 dated 42-07 G. Grndk4VDrainage/SWPPP Pian East (pond revisions) sheet C3-2 dated 4-2-07 H. Stomwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP sheet 0-3 dated 4-2-U7 L Utility Plan sheet C4.1 dated 4-18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer plan and Profile sheet C4-2 dated 4-13-07 K. Detail Sheet C8-1 dated 4-18-07 L. Landscape Plan sheet Ll -1 dated 413-07 A Lighting Plan sheet L2-1(undated) N. Monument Sign Plan sheet slated 1-15-07 O. Dumpster Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. RcU& iug Wall Plan sheets 1 fine 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Plans Cover sheet TS -1 R Lower Walkout Level Floor Plan sheet A-1 S. Main Level Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Lott Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Front Elevation sheet A-4 V. Walk43ut Elevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A-6 X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 c CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Flo. _ 56 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 5585 and Resolution No. 5592, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of AMBER, WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, Hennepin County, Minnesota and grants General Development Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 2C, subject to the following conditions; 1. General Development Plan Approval and Final Plat approval and Commercial Site Plan approval is granted subject to , nditious established within Resolutions No. 5585 and 5592, and subject to the conditions established within the Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract and other pertinent documents. 2. Final building design plaits for the buildings shall be subject to City Council review and approval prior to issuance of permits for said buildings should the Planning Director find that there are discrepancies between those attached to this Resolution and those submitted for building permit. Building permits and land alteration permits will not be issued any sooner than 24 hours following filing of the plat with Hennepin County. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be .filed with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office on or before November 14, 2007 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the agreements, easements, and covenants pertinent thereto. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby declares that the easements dedicated over the Property in accordance with development of Lot 2, Block 1, Orono Ambar, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be vacated upon filing of this Resolution and Developer's Agreement No. 2C with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. ATTEST: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5613 Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 14th day of May, 2407. Linda S. Vee, City Clerk `Jam M. White, Mayor STATE OF MZN'NESOTA COUN'T'Y OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was admowledged before me on this k day of 2007 by James M. White, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation d said instrument was executed on behalf of the City_ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPI N Notary Public 411 The foregoing instrument was acimowledged before me on this I day of 191604 2007 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation And said instrument was executed on behalf ofthe City. ATTAC1f3MNT: APPROVIWD DEVELOPMENT PLANS A. Final Pia# B. Cover sheet CO -1 dated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheet Ci -1 dated 4»2-07 D. Removals & Erosion Control Plan sheet C 1-2 dated 4-2-07 E. Site Plan sheet C2-1 dated 4-2-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet 0-1 dated 4-2-07 G. Grading 6rainageIMPP Plan East (pond revisions) sheet 0-2 dated 4-2-07 K Storm Water Pollution. Prevention Plan SWPPP sheet 0-3 dated 4-2-07 1. Utility Plan sheet C4-1 dated 4-18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile sheet C4-2 slated 4-13-07 K. Detail Sheet C8 -I dated 4-18-07 L. Landscape Plan sheet Ll -1 dated 4-13-07 M. Lighting Plait sheet L2-1(undated) N. Monument Sign Plan sheet dated 1-15-07 O. ! Dempster Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. Retaining Wall Plan slants 1 thm 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Pians Cover sheet TS -1 R. Lower Walkout Level Floor Plan sheet A-1 a S. Main Level Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Loft Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Front Elevation sheet A-4 V. I Walk -Out Elevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A4 j X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 .rr+� �x i BPI ��owr�rraw N to A H IF lug •',r. aur L ¢ O P R PC Exhibit H Doc No 4388203 08/1112007 04:30 PM i Certified filed and or recorded on above date: Office of the Registrar of Tides l Hennepin County, Minnesota Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles TranstD 319880 deputy 25 New cert Cert Fees 1205041 $1.50 AF $10.50 STATEFEE 4 $34.00 TDOCFEE $0.00 TSUR ; $46.00 TOW � CITY OF ORONO DRAFT 9.10-07 HENNEPIN COUNTY, hUNNESOTA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE LISTS 1-6, BLOCK 1, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE DEVELOPER: AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, LLC. OWNER: AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, LLC. 'Jt HtS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C ,AGREEMENT AND PUDIDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (collectively the "Agreement!) is made and entered into this day of 2007 by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter the "City") and Amber goods Office Centre; LLC, a limited liability company (hereinafter the "Developer" and the "Owners'). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning application including subdivision to curate five (5) building lots and one (l) common lot on one block to be known as AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE; commercial site plan review; and easement vacations for the purpose of developing approximately 34,00 s.f of office condominiums; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2007 the City Council granted Concept Plan approval for development of the proposed office condominiums per Resolution No. 5585, on the conditions that the Developer fulfill the obligations of the approved Concept Plan Resolution and enter into this Agreement to provide for conformance with the City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinances and to provide for the installation and maintenance of site improvements; and on May 14, 2007 the City Council granted General Development Plan Approval per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. ;Sb I -S. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the actual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Description This Agreement shall apply only to the following described Mperty located in Hennepin County, Minnesota: Lots 1.0 Block 1, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE (hereinafter the "PmperVj 2. Toning. T'he Property is zoned as a Planned Unit Development under the Orono planned astir development ordinance with underlying B-6 zoning. Developer Initial City Clerk Initial Page 1 or9 3. Permitted Uses. Within Lots 1-5 approximately 34,000 s.£ of office condominiums consisting of 5 duplex style walk -out buildings are permitted with surface parking at the main level within Lot 6 as depicted in the site plan and preliminary building plans and elevations. The permitted use of the office condominium buildings is general Office uses which may include business and professional offices of a general nature, and may include a clinic for human care on an outpatient basis only. Retail uses accessary to the office use may be allowed with the limitation that within any building, retail uses shall not exceed 5% of the gross floor area of that building. Oilier uses shall not be allowed except by amendment of this PUD Agreement. No accessory structures are permitted within Lots 1 — 5. Within Lot 6 the only accessory stnxtures allowed shall include: a) Trash enclosures, constructed of materials comparable to and compatible with those of the building to be constructed within Lots 1-5; and b) Monument identification signs per the approved plans. No other accessory structures are permitted except by amendment of this Agreement. 4. Site Access. Primary access for internal circulation for the Property from Highway 12 shall be via a right-in/right-out driveway access directly to Highway 12 shared with the Orono Senior Housing development, Planned Unit Development No. 2 (PUD No. 2), to the direct east. Surface perking and drive aisles will be provided along the southern and western ends of the Property at the main floor level of the buildings. A secondary access to Highway 12 is provided via access agreements to be granted through the surface parking lot within the Orono Senior Housing site to the cast (Lot 2, Block 1, Orono Ambar), which were required with approval of PUD No. 2, allowing for a connection to Brown Road South and ultimately a future stoplight at Brown Road South and existing Highway 11 Such agreements will be granted by the City of Orono Housing & Redevelopment Authority, which owns said Lot 2, Orono Ambar. The parking lot and driving lanes within the Property are additionally designed to allow for future vehicular connections 1) at the northwestern corner of the Property for a future frontage road to Outlot D. Sugmvmods; and 2) to the adjacent parcel at 2120 West Wayzata Boulevard (PINS No. 34-118-23 24 0001). The Developer shall enter into cross ingress and egress agreements with the City, the Orono Senior Housing development, and the City of Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The easement agreements will be required as part of the final plat to allow for public vehicular use of new and existing parking lot connections between the properties and to provide for new connections should they be developed at some future date. 5. Development Plans. The Property shall be developed in accordance with final plans (the "Playas"} which dM first be certified by the City Planning Director as being in conformity with the approved plans described below and with the provisions of this Agreement. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans are: Developer Initi City Clerk lnitias -& Page 2 of I, A. Final Plat B. Cover sheet C0-1 dated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheet CI -I dated 4-2-07 D. Removals & Erosion Control Plan sheet Cl -2 dated 4-2-07 E. Site Plan sheet C2-1 dated 4-2-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet 0-1 dated 4-2-07 G. Gmding/Drainage/SWPPP Plan East (pond revisions) sheet C3-2 dated 4-2-07 H. Stormwater Pollution Prevention. Plan. SWPPP sheet C3-3 dated 4-2-07 L Utility Plan sheet C4-1 dated 4-18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile sheet C4-2 dated 4-13-07 K. Detail Sheet C8-1 dated 4-15-07 L. Landscape Plan sheet Ll -1 dated 4-13-07 M. Lighting Plan sheet L2-1 (undated) N. Monument Sign Pian sheet dated 1-13-07 0. Dumpster Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. Retaining Wall Plan sheets 1 thru 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Plans Cover sheet TS -1 R. Lower Walkout Level Floor Plan sheet A-1 S. Main Level Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Loft Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Front Elevation sheet A-4 V. Wal[ -Out Elevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A-6 X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 The Pians are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD); the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDO'I) and subject to any additional requirements and conditions specified by the City Engineer upon review of the Plans. Construction of the buildings shall be in conformance with the building codes and regulations adopted by the City. Any substantial changes to the gross square footage, footprintWVroof dimensions or defined building height shall require a prior amendment to this Agreernem Developer Initial City Clerk Initial Page 3 of 9 6. Improvements: in accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following described public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements") shall be constxWed, installed and maintained by the Developer according to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement: A. Site grading, roadways and driveways, curb and gutter, panting lots, sidewalks, retaining walls and all necessary erosion control measures per the approved Grading and Drainage Plea (hereinafter called "site grading improvements'); B. Construction of sanitary sewer and water connections, and construction of storm sewer lines and facilities as required (hereinafter called "stormwater improvements') per the Utility Plan referenced herein. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated over entire Lot 5 as part of the final plat. C. Underground natural gas, electric, cable and telephone service to be arranged by the Developer with the utility companies involved (hereinafter called the "other utility improvements"); D. Landscaping and site revegetation improvements per the approved Landscape Plan referenced herein (hereinafter called "landscaping improvements'). E. Traffic control signage subject to approval by the City Engineer and Public Services Director. F. Any additional improvements listed within the Site improvements Cost Estimate attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Estimate"). 7. Construction of Improvements A. Commencerment Date — Constriction of Improvements shall begin no later than E. Completion slate — All Improvements shall be completed no later than .�% K'd. f '30 47401 (2 years after start date). The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. C. o rs -- The Developer shall select, retain and supervise the contractor(s) responsible for construction of the Improvements. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of each such contractor. Where required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first obtain a license from the City. D, Pre -Con- ruction Conference — Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and the developer's contractor shall meet with the responsible City officials to review construction plans and schedules, Developer Initial 94 City Clerk lnldalIW— Page 4 of 9 E. Permits — Prior to the start of any construction, the developer's contractor shall apply for and receive all necessary permits for the Improvements from the City and/or government agencies having jurisdiction. Site grading shall not commence until a land alteration permit has been issued. Developer is advised that an erasion control permit must be obtained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as well as the required NPDES constriction site permit, before commencing any grading activity on the site. F. Construction — The construction, installation and materials shall be in accordance with the Plans approved by the City. G. h=QW1 — The City, through its staff and/or consultants, shall inspect the installation of the improvements to ensure compliance with the Plans. The cost of such inspections will be paid by the Developer and are anticipated to be approximately $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 but could exceed these amounts if major problems arise. An escrow account in the amount of $15,000 to cover the costs of inspection shall be established with the City by the Developer. H. IaMnM — The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any portion of the Improvements to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmen's Compensation, Liability and Property Damage (with coverages consistent with industry standards). 8. Performance Security. For the purposes of assuring to the City that the Improvements will be completed according to the terms of this Agreement, and that the Developer will Pay or will cause to have paid all claims for work done and materials and supplies famished, the Developer or its general contractor will deposit with the City prior to issuance of site grading and building pennits an irrevocable letter of credit (LOC) from a local (Twin Cities area) financial institution in a form satisfactory to the City, providing that the City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Improvements if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the completion date specified. in Section seven (7) above. Further, if the required improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the LOC, the City may also draw on the LOC. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. The amount of the LOC shall be 1506A of the estimated improvement costs. The estimated improvement cost is $713,723.75; therefore, the LOC amount shall be $1,070,585.63. As substantial elements of the Improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, the City will authorize reduction of the LOC in an amount equal to 150% of the cost estimate for that please of the improvements deemed complete, but in no case shall the LOC be reduced to a point less than I ODA of the original amount until all Improvements are complete and accepted by the City. The LOC shall expire no sooner than one year after the completion date specified in Section 7 above, to allow for at least one freeze -thaw cycle for parking lot settlement. Security to ensure survival of landscaping vegetation shall be retained for eighteen (18) months after Ply Developer Initial City Clerk lftitia]ZAel— PgV 5or9 4. Fees and Expenses. The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for all the variable additional expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, but not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other professionals, which are not covered by City application fees. 10. Notice. Required notices to the Developer and the Owner shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, the Owner, their employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer and the Owner by registered mail at the following addresses: Notice to Developer Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC Philip Carlson P.O. Box 184 Wayzata, MN 55391 Notice to Owner Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC Philip Carlson P.O. Box 184 Wayzata, MN 55391 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by registered snail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Orono City Offices, 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O, Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323, Telephone 952-249-4600. 11. Additional Conditions A. Turning radiuses of fire apparatus access roads on the Property shall be designed subject to approval of the City Engineer and Orono Fire Marshal. B. Fire lanes will be marked with the appropriate street signage and yellow curbing. Orono Fide Marshal will determine fire lanes upon review of the Plans and final access routes and at that point determine exact placement of signs and yellow curbing. C. The walk -out elevations of the buildings shall be as set out in Document C3-1 of the construction documents dated March 20, 2007 unless modified with the approval of the City Engineer. D. Storm sewer facilities which lie outside of public right-of-way shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer until the end of the period of Developer control of the association at which time they will be maintained by the Amber Woods Office Center Association. E. All sanitary sewer and water connection lines within the Property shall be owned and maintained by the Developer until the end of the period of Developer control of the association at which time they will be maintained by the Amber Woods Office Center Association. Developer Initial City Clerk Initial, Page 6 of 9 F. No site work or construction shall commence, until the Developer has paid the Storm Water and Drainage T mak Ree as established in Concept Flan Resolution 5585. The MCES Sewer AvaiWAity Charges (SAC) are the responsibility of tate Developer and shall be paid to the City at the time of building permit issuance for pass-through to MCES. C. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits from the regulatory agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Health, MCES, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota DNR, MPGA, and MnDOT. H. The Developer shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction. The Developer will comply with the City Engineer's dhwdon as far as abandonment or relocation of the drain tile. I. The Developer shall provide the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval for all material imported or exported from the Property. If the material is to be imported or exported tolfroze another site in Orono, it should be noted that those other parcels will be required to obtain a land alteration permit, and potentially a conditional use permit from the City. J. The Developer shall obtain a temporary construction easement from and elfish permanent maintenance agreements with the owner of the property directly west at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard for construction and maintenance of the necessary retaining walls. 12. General CoBditions. The general conditions of this Agreement are documented in City Council Resolution No. Slol3 adopted by the City Council on May 14, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference. Additional Conditions of approval are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Developer Initial City Clerk Initial Fsge 7 of 9 ' r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Developer, and the Owner have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day arid:, year first above written. CITY OF ORONO By; 44cp.,,r )M . y ) By: 4-6c., /' 4L -e/ (City Clerk) DEVELOPML - Amber Woods ee Centre, LLC By: Its: � e l Chief ManaW �r V61,77 -4 - Reviewed fbr Administration: Date: -6--//-07 This instrumen# was drafted Try: City of Orono 2750 Kelley Ply P.O. Bast 66 CrysW Bay, MN &956 STA'T'E OF MINNESOTA 0 f V8of9 Developer Initial (/ City CIO& Initiall COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrmem was acknowledged before me on this play of filzve 2007 by James M. White, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said inshminent was executed on behalf of the City. '7�)cXxIAICIt Notary Pub is The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on t,is- relay ofi�amatron a6c 2007 by Linda S. Vee, City Cierk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal cond said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL DODGE WTARY P118lJC-MINNESOTA M!I GbmmE�(®� Jert. s1, alto STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HEMEPIN Ale Notary Public This instrunierit was acknowledged before me this eld y of a 2007, by Philip Carlson, Chief 1V wagon, Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC; a Limited Lia ility Corporation, on behalf of Amber Woods Office Center, LLC. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Z.." • / p u.." Notary Public This instnnnent was acknowledged before me this lday of, 2007, by Philip Carlson, Chief Manager, Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation, on behalf of Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC. LINDA S. VEE J. 6�� WTARYPUBM- M Notary Public �YC�Exgres. 31.201] Developer Initial Page 9 of 9 City Clerk Initial MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT TD DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FIRST COMMERCIAL BANK, a , ahnta Cx"*r 4t"" , which holds a mortgage on the subject prep%tY, the development of'which is governed by the foregoing Plumed Unlit Development Amt anti Developmem Conttut, agrees that the Planned Unit Development Ag vmwt and Development Conuam shall remain in full force and effect event if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dam: „ An 24 .2007. STATB OF WffNNESOTA COUNTY OF tiaa+w`s..pt,n FIRST COMMERCIAL BANK iL /M AMEM ,lar 00WOol.EM (6s. N*WPULM-904M3-------------- The fafegoing instrtment wo acknowledged before me this 2`1day of Matt 2007, by &*Al!- k - S4i of and ZAo� o t 1z, taw +n" the P"sicl"^+ -t LED anal vitae i d of F1R T tOMNIERCIAL, BANK, >I; � : rs��sa�1�.3 e�Q,r r}r� � on its behalf. NOTARtPIMLIC DRAFTED BY: PrqSWond Anadarran 317RWadale OMW Caerx 1380 Cocpowaie GWar Cu ve Eagan, Minnewa SS 12I Telephone: (651)452%iWo SRN 131mo1 ORONOIAmber Woods Oflttr Centre SItN:oSf2htM PUD NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT EXMJT A - SITE A PROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE 312611007 Amber Woods Office Center Plat D7.3250 Cost Estimate for Financial Guarantee (160%) Sartltgry Sewer improvernronto Llrits $Mrtlt Total Mobiiaattors 15 1 S �r,0�J0.t10 $;x,000 0 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 11000.00 $1,000.00 Conned to Existing ir" Sanitary Sewer PA 1 $ 2,500.00 $2,500.00 B" PVC S,a"Itary Sewer LF 360 $ 30.00 $10,800.00 0- X 6„ Wye EA 5 $ 100.00 $600.00 4' blameter Sanitary Sewer Manhole EA 4 $ 2,000.00 $8,000.00 4' Qiarneeter Sankey Sewer Menhole Overdepth LF 22 $ 100.00 $2,200.00 ImROW Me Foundation LF 400 $ 1.00 $400.00 Estimated'Const action Goat . $30,400.00 wsur Main irn rmmenis Emits $/Unit Total Rerno,ve alsting Waterrnaln Pipe LF 2.00 $ 6.00 $1,200.00 Remove Hydrant EA 2 $ 600.00 $1,200.00 ' Canned to Uding Water Main EA 2 $ 2,500.00 $5,000.00 S" QIP WOW main LF 760 $ 40.00 $30,400.00 8" DIP Water Mohr LF 85 $ 30.00 $2,550.00 r Fittings EA 15 $ 250.00 $3,750,00 Inecaation 8Y 10 $ - 10.00 $100.00 Hydrant EA 3 $ 2,5W.00 $7,800.00 r Gv and Box EA 2 $ 1,300.00 $2,600.00 8" Gv and Bax EA 3 $ 1,200.00 $3,@00.00 Estimated Construction Cosi $67,90D.00 Services Im rovements Units 9U $AJnit Total r PVC, Service ripe Lit 35S $ 22.00 $7,810.00 1.5 Inch copper service V 305 $ 16.00 $4,880.00 1.5 loch coM EA 5 9+ 200.00 $1,0DIDD 1.5 inch curb EA 5 $ 260.00 $1.250.00 Estimated Ccm tructlorr Ccat 14,940.00 Storm Server Unita $!Unit Total Remora Existing Storm Sewer Ripe LF 15 $ 7.00 $105.00 Connect to ExW!ng Stnxtm EA 1 $ 11500.00 $1,500.00 15" Storm Sem LF 1,183 $ 30.00 $35,490,00 2+ x 3` Gatch Basfrf EA 2 $ 1,500.00 $3,000.00 48" Catch Bssinlfulsrnhoka &A 15 $ 2.000.00 $30,000.00 Estimated Construction Cost $70;095.00 rictrt Lot I Grading P Lands cat in Units O SNnit Total Remove Robbing WaftLF 935 $ 7.00 9,745.0 Remove, Curb and Gut;Wr LF 30 S 5.00 $160.00 Gredirsg LS 1 $176,000.00 $175,OW.00 Retsinfng Well SF 8,000 $ 25.00 $150,000.00 Fence LF 810 S 20.00 $18,200.00 Subgrade Preperabn SY 4,138 $ 1.75 $7,236.25 Aggregate Ease, Class 5100% Crushed. 8" (CV) TN 2,101 $ 14.00 $29,400.04 Connate Curls and Gutter B618 LF 1,840 $ 11.00 $18,040.00 Surmountable Curb and Gutter LF 44 $ 10.00 $440.00 Bltuminous Base Course- 2" TN 605 $ 50.00 $25,250.00 Bituminous Weer Course, -1 1/Z" TN $78 $ 55.00 $20,790.00 Shumhotrs Materlal For Tack Cost GAL 210 $ 2.00 $420.00 Cons rete Skk walk SF 7,715 $ 4.60 $�34yy,7,1V7.5//0�� S*hg L$ 1 $ �t G 3,e500,DD $3,5 ,00 Singage 8 1 $ 500.011 W0,00 Landscaping LS 1 $ 45,000,00 546,000.00 Tsmg Ero*.cD t Gcnfrof ES 1 $ 10,000.00 $10,300.00 EsUrneted Construction Cost $540.388.75 .Summary Of Improvements Sentiary Sewer $30,400.00 Water Dict $57,900.00 SerAces $14,940,00 Storm Sewer $70,095.00 Parking Lot f Gradin l LandscaRIE2 $540,388.75 TMI Esiirrtate Cartshx t ri Cast $713,723.75 50% $35%861.08 TOW for Flnenciatl Guarantee $1,070,688.63 PUD NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT EXHIBIT B Additional Terms and Conditions 1. The Improvements include the items listed within PUD NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and as enumerated in Exhibit A of said CONTRACT. 2. The Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans as stated in the CONTRACT, and with the pertinent conditions of approval within the General Development Plan and Final Plat Approval Resolution (Resolution No. -(e 13 ) adopted by the City Council on 2047. 3. All construction traffic related to development of the Amber Woods Off= Centre shall be routed directly to Highway 12 through the approved direct access location at the southwest corner of the Senior Housing site, or through the adjacexet commercial site to the west if allowed by that owner. Use of the Senior Housing access to Brown load shall be avoided for all construction traffic. 4. Construction and contractor making, materials storage, etc. shall not occur on the Senior Housing site. S. Developer shall take all due precaution to avoid construction activity encroaching into die adjoining residential property abutting the north boundary of the site. 6. No land alterations shall take place until erosion control is established and the City Engineer has approved all final improvement plans. No building permits shall be issued until all drainage facilities and improvements have been installed and satisfactory parking lot & driveway base (including base and initial lift of bituminous) has been installed, and approved by the City. 7. All buildings on the Property shall be constructed according to final plans which shall first be certified by the Planning Director as being in conformity with the approved plates. 9. Developer shall provide the City Engineer with two (2) full-size sets, and shall provide the City with 2 full-size sets and one set reduced to 11" x 17", of final site improvement plates, two weeks prior to commencemem of land alteration activity. NE WITH 30' OF SPACE) - ® 4" SOLID LINE LINE EPDXY GR IN (YELLOW) N (WHITE) 1�-J 1ESSAGE LEFT ARROW Q 4" SOLID LINE EPDXY GR IN (WHITE)S 0 50 100 10 GR IN (WHITE) � ipS i scalern feet O INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIAL I( 1 � PC Exhibit J I \ EX. R/W-- R/W �� 1��, �J �� WHO `"A H 1 � A r A � Z 1 _ k P o r F F F I r r ! P A X T. E. J F EX. R/W H D G X _ T. a I EX. R/W E �1� <¢ I I Wa z \ 1 EX. R/W� — ( I I EX. R/W J �C L CSAH 112 �C E <- B112B> SHAUGHNESSY AVE 1 \� NOTES: OA 10' CURB TYPE TRANSITION, PAID SAME AS ADJACENT CURB. �f © MATCH EXISTING O SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEET NO. 150— 157FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. � OINDICATES DETAIL NUMBER, SEE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP X DETAILS ON SHEET NO.163-173. 14 I aa0 �I I LEGEND 3.0" BITUMINOUS TRAIL ' SEE INSET B, PLAN SHEET NO.60 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE INSET C, PLAN SHEET NO.60 COMMERCIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SEE INSET G, PLAN SHEET NO.60 ®COMMERCIAL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SEE INSET F, PLAN SHEET NO.60 ®RESIDENTIAL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SEE INSET E, PLAN SHEET NO. 60 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL D, PLAN SHEET NO. 60 0 50 100 scale I'n feet GENERAL NOTES s SEE SHEET 136 FOR GENERAL NOTES. I n EX. R/W lot IgAIL. 4 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1 160 " �- ` N �� _ — ` + r -• X. R/W I II 2 i — Lval��� s G810 SS ()IREt 6 l ENERAL 61,2 C&G D 0��AG s f 36'8 i�� 2• B' S 36' 32' 1 1.2 •���'...�...i�s._ w.rw.�w.�wdw`.iii •ii.Sl: iril���i4!�ir��i�0=0d;� . 3 14' 12' ._� 12' 7 12' 14' j �D ' _6 WALK~— — -- - — ----�. p u — 1 - 1 EX. R/W 7Fx--r. 6 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS r' S :5 0AS5 2010 CSAH 112 <EB112B> 8612 C&G 1 �} T C � � 1 2069 A EX. R/W k� Q 1.1� X95'1 m 0 u vi AlLy. B612 C&G RETAIN INGJ I WALL A M1L0�' ZNC . ��\k � ELE0��1C a ri n vA w� C� �� T. E. XG 'Z� AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE DUMPSTER SCREENING FRONT N IEW &UAL CLAD GATE METAL CLAD SIDING AMBER MOODS OFFICE CENTRE DUMPSTER SCREENING Q 97 i ;n SIE RAR VE METAL CW SONG AMER WOODS MICE cNrRE 2060 WEST WAYZATA BLVD, ORONO, MN -WAS sir - r -e INI'EWACE--WEST , INC P0 9OX 194, WAYZATA. MN 55991 Pit 952-24H 117 FX- 9M -z49 -111S EMAH; jh i PC Exhibit K r jL1.r,. r ,amm, Lf II r r r—Ir-ev !w aono.ai"zffl - " " ,, I � . 11 Eta Ovn rLr f •I AT HINE ell 27 MTft I 4 C • �. c� rI �l�ylf�� •1 erL°fes i;y rr. /i, 1 npetretron o4oehan L ��� f. L} 1 o a 1., l� ._—r-yat�.1r� �IIAw ,I,I-•r i,—'T� mmolm, r' rl._Z �Lwa ` z �'• wrL:r I�� nom:,: _ajr F-,ti.._rr. K tr mm � - �•r<� 1 sop RAs •- J: Z= i IYI er 1 -.�`■ -fir _ Si��w1=f tw `,yam—! f r.�l1w 1�- w�+w -.r.-1..J AAS r �� r T� i l _:�.1 � ■ . I...,r - Aserr - _ sm 1.....1.,,.1............- PMENI Z= _= — r r �:� L -I �r--1'�t ti.w ■ l,arr _— w �r -I. r- -�,r cl-: �.�`rr-•..Tr- ,< ,-,rr rr■ �i - yw. _ L -•,1 �1ii r �: rlf' � ,mow -,_ C"-l�rlr'Ir+ ww ':1 t�'-� � ' l a. r'r } t �rlrL+. 1'.:ll i_-7.I��I':�.r:lr w.:•=i.l.. �'� CONNKTExPLORER" 26 vw A4101 -- map, Auto - 04117/2015 (2015) - -C image I of 4 4 0 0 X PC Exhibit i P, Wk ■ er CONNECTExPu3RER" lk P�d a try 4� map- Auto - 04/17/2015 (2015) - < image 1 of 4 3 -L C4 r L T t I Al FFMA=� M G Ir rP qF map, Auto - 04117/2415 (2015) • 4 [made 7 of 4 �► k LJ oil L-1 I, - i map: Aorto - 0411612015 (2015) • t image 1 of 7 ), owu c !11 4 A e r � �e ter. �..-- M G �` C N KTExPL RE " ago M 'll .,. > < 3 i 11 - 4. map. Auto • 0411712015 P15) - < image 1 of 4 > I0 a- f� 1 . l+ f ® i Use Avery Template 5760 , � rye Pop-up Feed paper expose Fop -up Edge Edge— 1 1� '� 5960Tm 38 34-118-23 21 0002 38 34-118-23 21 0037 ORONO STATION WEST LLC CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC 2160 W WAYZATA BLVD PO BOX 575 PC Exhibit K ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34.118-23 210021 38 34-118-23 210038 ROMY M ACKERBERG CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC STUART I ACKERBERG PO BOX 575 2102 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0022 38 34-118-23 21 0039 PAUL D ANTONENKO CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC ELIZABETH R ANTONENKO PO BOX 575 2104 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0023 38 34-118-23 21 0040 R M SCHOMMER & EM SCHOMMER CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC 2106 SUGARWOOD DR PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0024 38 34-118-23 24 0001 MICHAEL LlJACQUELINE M RICKS ORONO STATION LLC 2108 SUGARWOOD DR 2120 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0025 38 34-118-23 24 0072 GEORGE E & MARILYN MILEUSNIC CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC 2110 SUGARWOOD DR PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0028 38 34-118-23 24 0073 SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC CIO FRANK PINGTENS PO BOX 575 2007 SUGARWOODS DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 34-118-23 210030 SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/O REBERS FAMILY LLC 2640 OAKLAND RD MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 34-118-23 21 0033 JEANNE MORK BREDESON 3848 SUNSET DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 34-118-23 210036 ORONO HSG & RDVLPT ATHY�17 � 2040 WAYZATA BLVD W } LONG LAKE MN 55356 3898 OF ORONO 9tiquettes faciles A peter I A � Sens de RePllez h la hachure afro d,e i www.averycom Utilisez Ie gabarit AVERY®5160® j charaement r6v6ler le rebord pop-up"" j 1 -800 -GO -AVERY Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: i j PC Exhibit L DI k EIYS LAKE 2.7.-1..1.&33-33 27-118-23-34 34-118-23-22 4118-23- W 3 -1 34-118-23-22 _ - 34;118-23'!� 34- 4' 34-118-23-23 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 3411823210037 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West Orono, MN 55356 34-118-23-11" ..1 � � f ` 34118-23-12 R a 3-4-118-23-24 S d Ca � � r n 34-118-23-f3 0. V� 34-118-23-13 IR 0 120 240 480 ft RECEiVEDFor more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South JAN 17 2017 Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us C1W OF ORONO 38 98 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 8 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3899, James Smale representing Little Acorns Child Care Inc., 2060 Wayzata Blvd. West, Conditional Use Permit for Daycare Use Presenter: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to review the Conditional Use Permit application and provide direction regarding approval. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd: 1/17/17 Complete: 1/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 3/18/17 3. Background. The applicant, Little Acorns Childcare, currently operating in Long Lake, is requesting that the City approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow operation of a daycare in the existing building on the property. Please review the attached Planning Commission memo and exhibits. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed this application and held a public hearing at its February 21St meeting, and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to a number of conditions and recommendations: a. Applicants to provide detailed plans with regard to the outdoor play areas, which should be designed to meet State of Minnesota licensing standards. b. Prior to occupancy, the final lift of bituminous to be installed and the parking lot striped per the approved site plans, and dumpster screening be constructed. c. A signage plan, meeting City requirements to be submitted. d. Property owner to provide a detailed schedule for completion of required site improvements. The applicants were advised that above items (a., c. & d.) should be submitted no later than Wednesday, March 8, 2017 in order to allow for action by the City Council on March 13, 2017. The plans noted in item a. should include scaled and dimensioned depictions of the proposed play areas, noting fencing or other planned demarcation of the areas as well as any revisions to parking areas, curbs, etc. that are proposed. The signage plan (item c.) should include the proposed dimensions and location of all proposed signage relative to the daycare use as well as plans for completion or replacement of the existing monument sign. As of this writing (3/9/17) plans have not been received. 5. Public Comments. No public comments were forthcoming at the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. Per the City's standard practice, all property owners within 350 feet of the property were notified of the hearing. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that Council review the Planning Commission memo and exhibits as well as the draft PC minutes. Council should consider whether the daycare use as described by the applicants is acceptable for this site and whether all pertinent issues or concerns have been addressed. If Council concludes that a CUP for the daycare use should be issued for this site, staff will draft a resolution for approval to be considered for adoption at the March 22, 2017 Council meeting. Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ AGENDA ITEM 17-3899 March 13, 2017 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Review the CUP request with the applicants and provide staff with direction regarding drafting of a resolution for approval or denial of the application. Exhibits A — Notice of PC Action 3/1/17 B — Draft PC Minutes of 2/21/17 C — Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 2/21/17 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5^ NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 TO: Little Acorns / Att. James Smale 1865 W. Wayzata Blvd., Suite 112 Long Lake, MN 55356 ZONING FILE: DATE OF NOTICE: COPIES: Dale Richardson CBS -MN Properties P.O. Box 575 Long Lake, MN 55356 Council Exhibit A 17-3899 March 1, 2017 James smaieCWredpathce.com CommercialBuildingServ@live.com TYPE OF REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit for Daycare Use at 2060 Wayzata Blvd. DATE OF MEETING: February 21, 2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of a conditional use permit for daycare use at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard, subject to the following additional recommendations: a. Applicants to provide detailed plans with regard to the outdoor play areas, which should be designed to meet State of Minnesota licensing standards. b. Prior to occupancy, the final lift of bituminous to be installed and the parking lot striped per the approved site plans, and dumpster screening be constructed. c. A signage plan meeting City requirements to be submitted. d. Property owner to provide a detailed schedule for completion of required site improvements. The above items (a., c. & d.) should be submitted no later than Wednesday March 8 in order to allow for action by the City Council on March 13. The plans noted in item a. should include scaled and dimensioned depictions of the proposed play areas, noting fencing or other planned demarcation of the areas as well as any revisions to parking areas, curbs, etc. that are proposed. The signage plan (item c.) should include the proposed dimensions and location of all proposed signage relative to the daycare use as well as plans for completion or replacement of the existing monument sign. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, March 13, 2017 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM For the March 13 meeting, a text amendment for PUD No. 2C will be presented to the City Council for consideration and adoption. A resolution granting a CUP for the proposed daycare use will also be presented for Council consideration and adoption. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. if you have questions, please contact Mike Gaffron at mgaffron@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4622. ML'NUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Council 6:30 o'clock p.m. Exhibit B 3. #17-3899 LITTLE ACORNS CHILD CARE, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:51 P.M. — 7:16 P.M. Mary Smale, Little Acorns Child Care, and Dale Richardson, CBS -MN Properties, were present. Gaffron noted this conditional use permit application review is conducted under the assumption that daycare use will ultimately be determined to be an acceptable use for this site. The applicant is currently operating a daycare business in Long Lake and is requesting that the City approve a conditional use permit to allow operation of a daycare in the existing building on the property. Currently the only Orono Zoning Code requirement for a daycare conditional use permit (in B-1 and B-3 Districts) is that 50 square feet of outdoor play area per pupil must be available. For a 95 -child level of use, the code would require a 4,750 square foot play area. This requirement is different from current state licensing standards, which require a minimum of a 1,500 square foot outdoor activity area. The applicants are proposing two 1,500 square foot outdoor play areas which would allow 20 students playing at a time under state regulations. Given existing state regulations, Staff does not believe there is a need to enforce the City requirement as long as the state requirements are satisfied. As it relates to parking, technically Orono's Code requires 15 stalls for this use. Use of the northerly portion of the parking lot for a play area eliminates six parking stalls and the backup apron that was required in the original parking lot approvals. This makes the remaining stalls abutting the play area less functional. Staff would be requesting a detailed site plan be submitted for the play area, showing how it will be fenced off, how it will be accessed, and its relationship to the adjacent parking area. The site currently does not have the capacity for a loop or drop-off lane and all vehicles dropping off or picking up children would have to park in a defined stall. The property currently has only right in/right out direct access to Wayzata Boulevard but does benefit by existing easements through the adjacent Orono Woods Senior Housing parking lots to access Brown Road and the signalized intersection at Brown and Wayzata Boulevard. Planned removal by Hennepin County of the median in Wayzata Boulevard and creation of an opposing center left turn lane will result in full Page 6 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. access directly to Wayzata Boulevard for this property. That access change is anticipated to occur within the next two years.` The applicants have submitted building layout plans that do not propose additional lighting. Parking lot lighting was completed by the original developer. The applicants have not indicated the need for any additional exterior lighting. If any new exterior lighting is proposed, photometric plans should be provided. Under the original approval, the dumpster area was to be enclosed but that has not yet been done. Any approval should require the dumpster area to be enclosed. In addition, the incomplete elements of the landscaping plan should be completed. The entire PUD development site is allowed 190 square feet of signage, which includes the existing partially -built monument sign and individual exterior wall mounted signs for each unit. The applicants should be asked to show the size and location of signage proposed for their use. The Planning Commission should discuss the issues outlined in Staff's report. If the Planning Commission concludes that this site is appropriate for the proposed daycare use, Staff would recommend approval subject to the following conditions: The applicants provide detailed plans with regard to the outdoor play areas, which should be designed to meet State of Minnesota licensing standards. 2. Prior to occupancy, the final lift of bituminous should be installed and the parking lot striped per the approved site plans, and dumpster screening should be constructed. 3. A signage plan meeting City requirements is to be submitted. 4. The property owner is to provide a detailed schedule for completion of required site improvements. Page 7 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 a 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit asked if City or state code require that the fenced -in play area be escape proof, such as being connected to the building. Gaffron stated he is not familiar with that and that the applicants would need to meet state standards. Thiesse asked who owns the hydrant. Gaffron indicated the fire hydrants and the water and sewer lines are city owned. The individual connections going to the buildings would be privately owned. Lemke asked whether there are any issues with fire trucks negotiating the parking lot. Gaffron stated it is likely that a fire truck would access through one of the neighboring properties. If a fire truck did go into the parking lot, it is likely it would have a hard time backing out. Gaffron noted the fire chief has not reviewed the plan at this time. Leskinen asked if the fire chief reviewed the original development plans. Gaffron stated he is not sure and can check on that. Dale Richardson noted the building is sprinkled. Mary Smale stated she is the owner of Little Acoreas Child Care and that they have been in business for the past 20 years, Smale stated they are required to obtain state approval on their plan and that they are here tonight to see whether Orono would allow this type of use on the property. Thiesse asked if she is comfortable with the proposed outdoor play area. Smale indicated she is. Smale stated in her view the families will love the new location and that it will be a great change for them. Landgraver asked if she has any thoughts regarding the signage. Page 8 of 48 As, MINUTES OF THE ORO -NO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Smale stated she has not really thought about signage at this point but that it likely would be located closer to the street. Smale noted the building is pretty visible from the highway but yet set back far enough for child care. Dale Richardson stated it is his understanding the contract for the road project will be let in April and that the median should be removed sometime this year. Richardson stated the signage will probably not be done until after the road work is completed since it is likely it would need to be removed as part of that project. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application, Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Olson stated the concerns raised by Staff are valid but that it seems like a good use for the building. Schoenzeit noted a lot of the regulations regarding daycares are controlled by the state. Thiesse stated his one concern relates to the fire hydrant in the back corner that might get fenced in. Gaffon stated Public Works will need to look at that. Richardson noted it is right on the corner. Thiesse stated if it is fenced in, it would be inaccessible in the event of a fire. Thiesse noted no accessory structures would be allowed on the property. Gaffron stated he would recommend the applicant provide a detailed site plan for how the site will be used. Gaffron stated the initial request was to see whether daycare would be allowed and that a more detailed plan would be required prior to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Page 9 of 48 M NUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. v Thiesse stated the remote play area is somewhat of a concern, especially as the property becomes more developed. Gaffron noted there is a stormwater system that runs behind the buildings down to the south end of the property. As of a few years ago, there were open catch basins that have since been covered. Gaffon stated it is possible that the storm sewer system could change depending on what happens with the rest of the property. Gaffron stated it is also possible that the parking on the site will need to be reviewed once the rest of the site is developed. Thiesse stated his biggest concern is 95 children in the back yard of the Sugar Woods Smale stated they probably have around 20 at one time and not 95. Leskinen asked at what point something will be done with the foundation. Richardson stated they intend to develop that site sometime this summer and that they have two interested parties in the building. Leskinen asked what type of use they were thinking for that site. Richardson indicated it would be professional use, likely architectural and legal. Thiesse asked if the play area would still be available during construction of the site. Smale stated that area would be gated and the children would not be able to simply walk over there unsupervised. Landgraver stated he has previously observed this daycare on outings down to the lake and that in his view there will be plenty of adult supervision. Smale stated they would need to comply with state requirements on the ratios for adult supervision. Page 10 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver asked if they are open 12 hours a day. O Smale indicated that is correct. Landgraver noted all the employees would not be there at all times, which will lighten the parking needs. Thiesse asked if they are willing to put down the final lift of asphalt prior to occupancy. Richardson indicated they will be doing a portion of the lot this year and then will be finishing it once the rest of the site is developed. Gaffron stated there is some risk to the applicant that the remaining construction will do some damage to the asphalt and base but currently the base is fairly stable. Thiesse asked if a construction schedule will be provided sometime this summer. Richardson indicated they are pretty much ready to go once they receive approval and that they will be submitting that in the near future. Landgraver asked whether there is an easement that exists for access across the adjoining property at 2120. Richardson stated there were some access agreements by the old owner but that he does not know whether they are still applicable. Richardson indicated his preference would be to go right out onto Wayzata Boulevard. Thiesse commented daycare would be a wonderful use of the building. Landgraver stated he would prefer to rely on the state licensing requirements. Page 11 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated in his view Orono's daycare standards should be removed from the code and they should just rely on the state regulations. lie Gaffron stated Orono's standards only apply to the B-1 and B-3 districts at this time. Landgraver moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3899, Little Acorns Child Care, 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West, granting of a conditional use permit, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 4. #17-3900 SCO KIRCHNER,1090 HERITAGE LANE,V 'vCE, 7:16 P.M. 7:24 P.M. Scott Kirchner, Applicant, was Curtis stated the subject property is an \ district. The lot was created in 1965 as Da the 2 -acre minimum requirement. The lot In addition, the applicant has made an a lot line rearrangement between the subj The proposed lot line adjustment woul ng lot/Foill d that is substandard in size for the LR -1A \of theneighborhood which predates the creation of .gentts of 0.98 acre in area. i r a subdivision exemption to allow an administrative rty d the Nelson property at 1780 Shoreline Drive. the si of the subject property to 1.07 acres but would still not meet the requirement of the istrict. The addition land will make the buildable area larger and possibly avoid setback variances or the development of the t in the future. A lot area variance is needed in order to process the ubdivision exemption. Staff finds there are derp6nstrable practical difficulties supporting tl% lot area variance. Planning Staff re mmends approval of the lot area variance. The Plann' g Commission had no questions for Staff. Page 12 of 48 Date Application Received: 1/17/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 1/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 3/29/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner February 21, 2017 #17-3899, James Smale representing Little Acorns Child Care, Inc. - Conditional Use Permit for Daycare Use at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard - Public Hearing COuncii Exhibit C Application Summary: The applicant, Little Acorns Childcare, currently operating in Long Lake, is requesting that the City approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow operation of a daycare in the existing building on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval subject to a number of conditions. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Proposed Use Overview Exhibit C. Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Building Interior Plans Exhibit E. Building Code Review for Daycare Use Exhibit F. Minnesota Daycare Licensing Requirements Overview Exhibit G. Comp Plan Excerpts Exhibit H. Zoning Code Excerpts Exhibit i. PUD No. 2C Agreement & Development Contract Excerpts Exhibit J. Wayzata Blvd Improvement Plans Excerpt Exhibit K. Original Approved Dumpster Enclosure Plan Exhibit L. Original Approved Landscaping Plan Exhibit M. Aerial Photos of Site Exhibit N. Property Owners List Exhibit 0. Plat Map Background Assumptions. This Conditional Use Permit application review is conducted under the assumption that 'daycare use' will ultimately be determined to be an acceptable use for this site specifically, or generally for properties within the B-6 Highway Commercial District. Further it is assumed that the existing provisions applicable for daycare use as a conditional use within the B-1 and B-3 business districts will apply. Those provisions are minimal, and read as follows: "Within the (B-1, B-3) business district, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses without a conditional use permit: "Day nurseries, provided not less than 50 square feet of outside play area per pupil is available and fenced." 17-3899 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 2 The applicants propose using the existing 7350 s.f. vacant building at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard by functionally converting it from a shell to a daycare facility. Please review the attached application narrative and proposed use overview provided by the applicants and the property owner. Employing a staff of up to 20, Little Acorns provides daytime child care for up to 95 children of which 45 are infants. The narrative indicates up to 75 families will be served, with staggered drop-offs/pick-ups throughout the day, typically up to 4 drop-offs at a time. The applicants propose to provide outside play space by fencing off a portion of the northerly parking lot as well as an area of currently open space near the NE corner of the site. The applicants should describe the business to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. A building code review by Mohagen Hansen Architects was provided by the applicants in Exhibit E, and links to State of Minnesota daycare licensing standards are included in Exhibit F. The City does not have direct involvement in the licensing of daycare facilities, as this is the purview of the State. Note that this review of a CUP for daycare use at just one of the 5 potential building pads must necessarily take into account the needs of future anticipated or potential uses for the remainder of the site. City Standards for Daycare CUP Required Outdoor Play Area. The "daycare" conditional use standards within the Orono Zoning Code are very minimal. As noted above, the only CUP requirement is that 50 square feet of outdoor play area per pupil must be available. For a 95 -child use, our code would require a 4750 s.f. play area (approximately 60' x 80'). This requirement does not mesh directly with current State licensing standards, which require a minimum 1500 s.f. outdoor activity area and there must be "at least 75 s.f. of space per child within the area at any given time during use" [MN Rules 9503.0155 Subp. 7(A)]. Applicants are proposing two 1500+ s.f. outdoor play areas which would each allow 20 students playing at a time. Staff questions whether there is a need to enforce the City requirement as long as the State requirements are satisfied. General CUP & Zoning Conditions Relative to This Location If the Planning Commission determines that the proposed use is appropriate for the B-6 District generally or for this specific site, additional general zoning conditions apply. Applicable City requirements established in code include the standard CUP findings, the standards for the applicable zoning district, and parking requirements. Certain conditions relative to the original development of the property have yet to be satisfied, and these need to be addressed prior to issuance of occupancy for the first and future buildings. These are discussed here relative to the applicants' proposal for this site: Parking. The PUD No. 2C Agreement which governs this site anticipates 5 office building pads with a commons parking and open space. Parking needs for office use were originally established at 20 stalls per building based on the net usable area within each identical building. A total of 102 stalls (97 standard plus 5 handicap) were approved with the original site plan. The proposed daycare or "day nursery" use would under Zoning Code Section 78-1516 require four stalls plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Based on the 85% net floor area rule and a 7350 s.f. building, the parking requirement for this use would be: Basic requirement........................................................4 stalls Net Floor Area = 0.85 x 7350 = 6248 s.f. (6248 — 1000) + 500 = 10.5 .......................................11 stalls Total required parking .... 15 stalls 17-3899 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 3 Taking into account that one of the two play areas encumbers a total of 6 stalls as depicted; a total employee count of 20 per the submitted materials; plus 4 stalls at one time used for drop-offs; the proposed use would appear to need approximately 30 stalls, leaving 72 stalls available for other future uses of the site. If the other four buildings were constructed and used for office as originally anticipated, the proposed daycare use would potentially reduce the parking availability below the established minimum requirements. Note that it appears the wear course of bituminous has not been installed on the parking lot. Site Vehicle Circulation. Use of the northerly portion of the parking lot for a play area eliminates 6 parking stalls and the "back-up" apron that was required in the original parking lot approvals. This makes the remaining stalls abutting the play area less functional. It would be important that a detailed site plan be submitted for the play area, showing how it will be fenced off, how it will be accessed, and its relationship to the adjacent parking area. The site currently does not have the capacity for a loop or drop-off lane, and all vehicles dropping of or picking up children would have to park in a defined stall. Vehicular Access to Wayzata Boulevard. The property currently has only right in — right out direct access to Wayzata Boulevard, but does benefit by existing easements through the adjacent Orono Woods Senior Housing parking lots to access Brown Road and the signalized intersection at Brown & Wayzata Boulevard. Planned removal by Hennepin County of the median in Wayzata Boulevard and creation of an opposing center left turn lane will result in full access directly to Wayzata Boulevard for this property. That access change is anticipated to occur within the next two years. Future Access Connections to Adiacent Properties. This site was originally approved to include the potential for future access to properties to the west, for two possibilities: 1) to provide for a segment of a planned 'backage' road between Brown Road and Willow Drive; and 2) to provide access to full -turning -movement intersections along Wayzata Boulevard. Near the south end of the site, the parking lot was provided with an apron extended to the adjacent property at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard, in anticipation of a shared access to Wayzata Boulevard directly across from Shaughnessy Avenue. This access is currently open; whether easements have been granted to cross the 2120 property is unknown. At the north end of the site, access to a potential backage road consisting of connected segments of Sugar Woods Outlot D and East Willow Woods Outlot C was established via the parking lot design. Easements through 2060 Wayzata Boulevard were required but never created. With the turnback of Wayzata Boulevard from MnDOT to Hennepin County, the original intent to limit individual driveway access to Wayzata Boulevard has been replaced with a philosophy of creating a business -friendly traffic movement environment in the Long Lake business district, hence the backage road appears to be no longer necessary. While fencing off the northwesterly portion of the parking lot would further act as a barrier to future backage road connections, it appears that such a connection is not likely to ever be required. In the event that the backage road is improved, it would be to the property owners' benefit to connect, providing their customers with additional access options. A minor modification to the parking lot and play area could be considered at that time. Building_ improvements. The interior improvements and layout of the building are depicted in the drawings provided, and a building code review has been provided by the applicants. Lighting. The applicants' submitted building layout plans do not propose additional lighting. Parking lot lighting was completed by the original developer. Applicants have not indicated the need for any additional exterior lighting. If any new exterior lighting is proposed, photometric plans should be provided to ensure glare does not impact the adjacent residential properties. 17-3899 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 4 Screening. A dumpster location was provided in the original parking lot layout southwest of the existing building (see Exhibit K). The dumpster area was to be enclosed, but an enclosure was never constructed. Any CUP approvals, and any occupancy permits issued for this or future buildings, should be issued only upon completion of a suitable dumpster enclosure. Landscaping. The original landscaping plans approved for this site (see Exhibit L) have been only partially completed or are in need of maintenance. While certain items cannot reasonably completed until buildings are constructed, other incomplete elements of the plan need to be implemented in a timely manner. Signage. The entire PUD development site is allowed 190 s.f. of signage, which includes the existing partially -built monument sign (currently with no message) and individual exterior wall mounted signs for each unit. Applicants should be asked to show the size and location of signage proposed for their use. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET (NA) Note that development of this site is governed by the PUD No. 2C Agreement. The property has been platted incorporating individual building pads which meet all setback, hardcover, and structural coverage requirements established within the Agreement. The proposed daycare use contemplates the use of an existing building appropriately located within the western -most platted building pad. Rather than a standard Lot Analysis worksheet, below is data regarding this existing PUD site: Total Lot Area: 2.6 acres Individual Pads: 0.14 acre + (Avg. approx.. 6300 s.f. each) Site Hardcover at Full Development: Approximately 55% (Hardcover Tier: Exempt) Parking Stalls Provided: 5 Handicap + 97 Standard = 102 Total Lot Coverage by Structures: Not Applicable (> 2.0 acres) Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The Community Management plan maps the site for office use but in the text suggests appropriate uses for the site include service uses, which supports the proposed daycare use. (The Planning Commission should discuss whether the proposed use meets the intent for a service use) 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed amendment of the PUD No. 2C Agreement would allow for consistency with use regulations. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The use of an existing commercial building for daycare use should not increase demand on public safety, transportation, or stormwater facilities. Pending improvements to the configuration of Wayzata Boulevard by Hennepin County will establish a direct full turning movement access to the site from Wayzata Boulevard which does not exist currently. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. No local sewer and water connection charges are due. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; No additional public service costs associated with the proposed use are anticipated. 17-3899 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 5 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The adjoining properties to the north and east are residential; to the south and west are commercial. The proposed daycare use appears to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan text that suggests service uses are appropriate for this site. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The Community Management Plan suggests that this property and those to its immediate west "should be developed with a mix of commercial uses including retail, service and office components"'. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The existing building has both commercial and residential characteristics and its location and design make it relatively compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. 8) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. 9) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; Landscaping should be inspected to ensure that adequate screening is retained between the existing building and the adjacent residential neighborhood. It appears that not all landscaping required with the original PUD site approvals is in place. This includes vegetative screening throughout the site as well as structural screening of the dumpster area. 10) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. 11) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; No evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise. Access easement through the Senior Housing site are in place to allow access to brown Road in the interim before Wayzata Boulevard improvements are completed by Hennepin County. 12) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed daycare use of an existing build is not expected to have any negative effects on the environment nor the natural, scenic and historic features of the area. 13) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right- of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The site currently contains appropriately shielded parking lot lighting. Any changes to the exterior lighting will need to be reviewed to ensure conformance with the glare standards; and 14) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. There is no evidence that the proposed use will have detrimental effects. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Public Comments No comments for or against the proposal have been received as of this writing.. 17-3899 2060 Wayzata Blvd. February 21, 2017 Page 6 Issues for Consideration 1. Is the proposed use appropriate given the location and surrounding uses? 2. Have the applicants described the business and how it will operate at this site to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission? 3. The applicants should address the apparent need for as many as 30 parking stalls — is this accurate, or are there other factors that reduce this number? 4. How will this use affect future development of the remainder of the site? 5. Are the proposed outdoor play areas appropriately located? Should the City require as a condition that the 50 s.f. per pupil City standard be enforced, or should the City defer to the state license standard? How critical to future development of the site are the parking stalls being converted to play area? A detailed diagram of how the play areas will be demarcated should be required. 6. Does the use require signage other than use of a portion of the monument sign and a small identification sign at the entry door? 7. Is the applicant comfortable with the existing Wayzata Boulevard access situation on a temporary basis? 8. Is the property owner intending to complete required overall site improvements, and on what timeframe? 9. What additional amenities or improvements are associated with this use that have not been discussed? 10. Does the property owner know whether easements exist for access across the adjoining property at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard? 11. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose additional conditions in order to mitigate the impacts of the use? 12. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation If the Planning Commission concludes that this site is appropriate for the proposed daycare use, staff would recommend as a minimum the following conditions: a. Applicants to provide detailed plans with regard to the outdoor play areas, which should be designed to meet State of Minnesota licensing standards. b. Prior to occupancy, the final lift of bituminous to be installed and the parking lot striped per the approved site plans, and dumpster screening be constructed. c. A signage plan meeting City requirements to be submitted. d. Property owner to provide a detailed schedule for completion of required site improvements. City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application StreetAddress: Application # c 2750 Kelley Parkway ! i —,5 5 , Orono, MN 55356 Date Received: 1717-1 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: MailingAddmss: P.O. Box 66 Escrow: $700 / NA Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 2060 W. Wayzata Blvd, Orono, MN 55356 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit I DAYCARE (attached additional sheets at necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Little Acoms / Attn: James Smale Phone (Primary): 612-846-3360 / 763-445-9404 Mailing Address: 1865 W Wayzata Blvd Suite #112 City: Long Lake ZIP:55356 Email: james smale@redpathcg.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 17 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email: Dale Richardson 612-708-6085 APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: Lake PC ExhibitA • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. if an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantlowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: CUP Application — January 2017 Page 4 Date: Date: Date: Date: RECEIVED JAN 1 72017 # 8 9^ CITY OF ORONO Little Acorns is NAEYC accredited child care center located conveniently right off of Wayzata Blvd in Long Lake, Minnesota. Little Acorns is a family owned center that has been providing trusted child care and preschool in Orono, Long Lake, Maple Plain and Wayzata since 1997. Little Acorns has achieved the highest quality rating through Parent Aware, a Minnesota based company. We offer a variety of services including preschool, full time, and part time child care for children of 6 weeks to 12 years of age. We currently are licensed for 101 children. We are conveniently open Monday through Friday from 6:30am until 6:30pm to meet all of your child care needs. JAN 17 2017 # 3899 CITY OF ORONO Custom Building Service LLC PO Box 575 Long Lake MN 55356 612-708-6085 Intent of project is to keep a local business in Town Narrative For 2060 Wayzata Blvd Propose to convert existing building that has been vacant to daycare Tenant Little Acorn Building size 7350 SF Hours of operation 7AM- 7PM Project to be complete by 4/15/2017 Total employees 20 Capacity up to 95 children 45 of which are infants PC Exhibit B Traffic up to 75 families of which is staggered through the day usually up to 4 drop offs at a time but no large rushes. This will include 2 play areas 1500 ft each one will be in parking area NW property one will be in low sheltered area NE We expect very little noise as we have a large buffer to the north and the elevation to the north east is lower by a 12ft wall This project will not produce any odors RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 3898 cnvoF oRONo I G Q1 "D �E\ N,\ \ `pw=1015 BW=1 �\ w �/ J 1 \ 1 �/ i o o AMBER WOODS — _ _ -- —x,017 / �, 1 �`'o OFFICE cMIMEIVED 1 -1 \ \ . 7W= 017. =101 0 010.0 =1006.0 Tw" 1 1 18 \ •Q 024 iP,RCETIDN'' 1022 X\ ! JAN 17 2017 AND n�vE7��_ l a ifl20 1016 _..._.._.._.. AIDE UNKNOWN)I 4 1 ri1 . 1018 \ 1 PC Exhibit C "! "0 1 ` ` ORONO,01313 ,.,....... Apr, \ �i IN7ER5PACE-WWISf INC. GINACARL50�V 1 1LP=B4 =1012'0 FFE�1018.80 X_ \ ` WARR 4 MN 55391 o ,0 Bw.tOtn. �p \ > � ` \ � \ BASEMENT -1008.20 \ � \ ='Q Bw.1 FfE=10a.40 \;�ozo0 — 1 BASEM�1,r� -1009.80 '� FFE-1a1s.501 d \ .. I 1 \ 1014 191G8o BASEMENT -1 g07.90 �,` \ - \ lots � � � � 3898 o e g f i \ e 1 p 1015 + 1A�8 018 9saao ., N .006,0 r, I \ \ . . 011.0 1 7. I I P cer. l 0 101 ty 191758 to � \ p I. MC �p5 �' 1 ']; o \ ASSOCIATES P „r+.. B �o ryV. ] ) l • .,I =1017.0 I \�� f 1 B. � , J ikefr cam p? ,00016. 1014.00 =101 � � �— d QS ENC DUM ]Ol =1016.0(] D1 \ \ EAIENTm100,5. 015 =1018 6 =10 .0 maws' w1d.YN jw cl w •J �2 2O X002 0 ' 1 END OF WALL � 61 / 0. 4 } Q T>% _AM .�YrnM�.i�rai .. mw r.�e� j ( FFEm1012,] EX. C ,lLi31NC Ol8 BASEMENT -1001.50 l p Pr5�11MMIgoX.R 101080 iwa�.w ��WsArw.e.4.[ve.arley 707p zs ros 1012.10 tom / 0rrg . r •- H l i9ir� .Jj Do l 1w.f / ! 1 �� �w � � _ 1D1& ! � J / r '_ �---- ------- ! VOW— 1st --^— BENCHMARK I Panora coxa ,0av , loop imee Top ,007.14 ami \ 1004 I; mccx�r � N OM Elev Nut OfHydrant Feet � / � ` � �/ _ —L.. '.: �, ��� 19o4.7a...� 4 oo7.s, � � � f � .} � � e.1 au+0wuawl (NGVD1/ r�/� ,29) / ` 1007.4 1 100687 1060.7 ? I [ CM raunci0wrcenx111�1 arr. 7S > I f w xaw,wrhwwru7 I Lint 006 ».l gg8 / Ga aawrnr0nw 1 >> 0 20 40+ 1 QOM Oqc I C3 f r �� ow_ n+nuannm � . l � �.a , ux ru�xsxnptF a 01e +a a. 4aa .\\. 10033. cc ^+z• .43- 1 .1 7.e5R q. i u.1 IMnnnExw 1000111, t 13 o J — SEE SEMET C3-2 1 GMING NOTES AND LEGICND � � 1y �f' J � �\ ` �� 2 r. ! ' 1 I r f GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN WEST 04118 ------------ €L i -- TEL �� TEL T.��=r%" � ' -. ' — �' ShP! h RECEIVED$,,,, JAN 1'7 2017 effy (IP ()RONa� PC Exhibit D W41, --------------------- Kj; ----------- ii 0 V % GN %.Zlzr aa� RECEIVED I JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO GN LLC # 3898 RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORO NO PC Exhibit E November 22, 2016 Re: Building Code Review for Daycare Occupancies 2060 Wayzata Blvd, Orono, MN Mohagen Hansen Project No.: 16403.00BS This document will provide a basic code review for the building located at 2060 Wayzata Blvd, Orono, MN. This code review will be focused on providing the requirements for an occupancy for a Day Care within the Minnesota State Building Code 2015 and the MN State Fire Code 2015. This review does include the MN Chapter 9503 Child Care Center Licensing. Basic Building CUrrent Information: 1. Occupancy: B (Business) 2. Building Construction Type: Type V -B 3. Stories: 1 with a Mezzanine and Basement 4. Square Feet per Floor: Basement Level: 1563 SF; Main Level: 1546 SF; Mezzanine: 749 SF 5. Sprinkled Fully Sprinkled, NFPA 13 6. kiting 2 exits, one on main level and one on basement level Day Care Reyiew: 1. Occupancy Classification Table 302.2 a. More than 5 children under 2.5 years of age without exit on level of classrooms: 1-4 i. Mezzanine level :1-4 occupancy not allowed by item #14 b. More than 5 but less than 100 children less than 2.5 years on level of exit: E 1. Main level or Basement level: E occupancy with direct access out of classroom. Exit doors need to be added. c. More than5 children greater than 2.5 years: E i. Main level or Basement level: E occupancy, no additional exiting required ii. Mezzanine level: E occupancy if exit door is added. 2. Table 503 Building Height and Size: E Allowable: 1stories and 9,500SF per floor Provided: 2 stories and approx.. 1600 SF or less per floor 3. 504.2 Automatic sprinkler system increase. a. Allowable stories increased by one story. 4. Table 803.9 Interior Finish Requirements for Flame Spreads Group E: Exits - Group B Corridors, Rooms = Group C Flame spread for C: 76-200 Smoke Development Index: 0-450 5. 906 Fire Extinguisher: to be located a maximum travel distance of 75'-0" 6. Table 1004.1.4 Maximum floor area per occupant: RECEIVED Group E: Day care:35 - any classroom over 1,715 SF needs two exits 7. 1008.1.10: Panic Hardware: Group E: is Required, JAN 17 2017 8. 1009 Stairways ,iooo Twelve Oaks Center Drive I suite 200, Wayi.eta, MN 55.391# 3898 01'ry OF ORONO 2060 Wayzata W. Gay Care Code Review November 18, 2016 Page Two 1009.3 Exit Access Stair: Floor Enclosure Exception 1: Stairways serving only two stories. (does not include mezzanine) - not required to be enclosed. 9. Table 1014.3 Common Path of Egress Travel: a. E occupancy= 75'-0": Main level and Basement Level complies. b. B occupancy -100': Mezzanine level complies 10. Table 1016.2 Exit Access Travel Distance: Group E: 250'-0" 11. 1018 Corridors: Both Group E: Corridors not required to be fire rated if the building is fully sprinkled. 12. 1018.4 Dead End Corridors Group E: 50'-0" if sprinkled 13. 1018.2 Corridor Width required Group E: 72" if occupant load is over 100. Building complies 14. Table 1021.2 Stories with one exit or access to one exit a. 1-4 not allowed on Mezzanine level with only one exit. b. Main Level: 75' to exit: Building complies c. Basement Level: 75' to exit: Building complies 15. 1104 Accessible Route a. Basement Level: if path to exterior door is accessible (1:20 ramp) then floor complies. if accessible exterior path does not exist then a lift (LULA) is required from Main level to Basement level. b. Main Level: if no stairs to the main entry then this level complies with code._ c. Mezzanine Level: if this level is less than 30 occupants then this level complies. No lift or elevator needed 16. Table 2902.1 Plumbing fixture count Group E Water Closets: 1 per 50 occupants Lavatories: 1 per 50 occupants Drinking Fountain 1 per 100 occupants Service Sink 1 a. Restrooms need to be located on accessible routs; therefor the Main level will need to add restrooms b. 2902.3.2: Accessible restrooms need to be within one floor and 500' of a space. If restroom are added to Main level, then Mezzanine level will comply with this code. Additional basic information from MN Chap, 9503 1. Outdoor play area: min. 1,500 SF, fenced off.: 2. Electrical outlets to be tamper proof. 3. Large muscle activity area needed 4. One handwashing sink and water closet for every 15 students Further Discussion 1. Rooms with Children 2.5 years and younger need a direct exit door out. 2. Restroom fixture count 3. Food Prep Area location MGHAGEN HANSEN Architecture j Interiors Jennifer Kaplan, AIA Architect MOHAGEN HANSEN Architecture I Interiors RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO IC 1 Jobs 12060 Wayzata-Blvd-16403\01A&dn 1 Code 116403—Code Review Dayem.docx ■ " f 'T Minnesota Licensing Standards for Day Care Centers - Daycare.com Ctttwww 20 mast iWimble, alfardebie and e live4n 4:h9dCdrg sdution wdh ou P&, r' •r_ THE BETTER DAYCARE AuPair4me offers a culturally enrlchlna, cost effective, and valuable altemative. Requirernents S ca COMIR "CLOW. SWUM licza WTORE ` k ¢gsysta� L. HIGHLIGHTS BOOKS! HIGHLIGHTS BOOKS! With a wide variety of stories. With a wide variety of stories. puzzles, and activities every month! puzzles, and activities every month) Page 1 of 3 PC Exhibit F X" LICENSING REQUIREMENTS Your state's Licensing Recuirements and wntact numbers, Licensing Standards for Daycare Centers Licensing Standards for Famil;f Daycare - Minnesota Licensing Application M1 Child Developement Fiarduoo!: Staff qualifications: The center must have a director and the appropriate number of staff qualified as teachers, assistant teachers, and aides based on staff ratio and distribution requirements. Within each age category, the first staff needed to meet the staff to child ratio must be a teacher; the second staff must be at least aide qualified; the third staff must be at least assistant teacher qualified; and the fourth staff must be at least aide qualified. Teacher: Must be at least 18 and meet one of nine possible combined credential, education and experience requirements, such as a high school diploma with 4,160 hours experience as an assistant teacher and 24 quarter credits in a child care -related field. Assistant teacher: Must work under the supervision of a teacher, must be at least 18, and meet one of the nine possible combined credential, education and experience requirements, such as a high school diploma with 2,080 hours experience as an aide or intern and 12 quarter credits. Aide: Carries out the child care program activities under the supervision of a teacher or assistant teacher. Must be at least 16; if under 18 must be directly supervised by a teacher or assistant teacher at all times except with sleeping children or assisting with toileting and diapering. Volunteers: If Included In the staff ratio, must meet the requirements for the assigned staff position. Volunteers who have direct contact or access to children must be supervised by director, teacher or assistant teacher. Staff orientation and in-service training: The applicant must ensure that every staff person and volunteer who will have direct contact with children, Is given orientation training before starting assigned duties, At least one staff person trained In cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid must be present in the center at all times when children are In care. The applicant must ensure that an annual in-service training plan is developed and Implemented as required. Child age groups: • • Infant - Age 6 weeks but less than 16 months old • • Toddler -Age 16 months but less than 33 months old • • Preschooler - Age 33 months but has not yet attended the first day of kindergarten • • School age - Is at least of sufficient age to have attended the first day of kindergarten, or is eligible to enter kindergarten within the next four months, but Is younger than 13 years of age. Staff ratios and group size: The applicant must meet the minimally acceptable staff to child ratios and the maximum group size within the following age categories: Age Range Ratios for Center Based Care in Minnesota State Infants (1:4) Toddlers (1:7) Preschool (1:10) School-age (1:15) Mixed age group ratio for youngest child in group Age Range Ratios for Family Child Care in Minnesota State Minnesota has seven classes of Family Child Care, each with different ratios and requirements. The two categories shown here are for reference only. For more detailed Information, contact the state licensing agency listed below. Child/Adult Ratio Age Restrictions https://daycare.com/minnesota/ 2/6/2017 Minnesota Licensing Standards for Day Care Centers - Daycare.com Page 2 of 3 Licensed Capacity Adults Total children Total infants and toddlers under school age 10 1 6 Of the total children under school age, a combined total of no more than 3 shall be Infants and toddlers. Of this total, no more than 2 shall be infants. 6. Specialized Infant and Toddler Family Day Care: (1) 5 1 3 No more than 3 shall be infants. (2) 6 1 4 No more than 3 shall be Infants. C. Group Family Day Care: 10 1 8 Of the total children under school age, a combined total of no more than 3 shall be infants and toddlers. Of this total, no more than 2 shall be infants. (2) 12 10 Of the total children under school age, a combined total of no more than 2 shall be Infants and toddlers. Of this total, no more than 1 shall be an infant. (3) 14 2 10 Of the total children under school age, a combined total of no more than 4 shall be infants and toddlers. Of this total, no more than 3 shall be Infants. A helper may be used in place of a second adult caregiver when there Is no more than 1 Infant or toddler present. D. Specialized Infant and Toddler Group Family Day Care: 9 2 7 Of the total children, no more than 4 shall be infants Both caregivers shall be adults. License fees Application fee for Initial license: An applicant for an initial license or certification issued by the Licensing Division must submit a $500 application fee with each new application. The application fee Is not prorated, Is nonrefundable, and is in lieu of the annual license or certification fee that expires on Dec. 31. The Licensing Division will not process an application before the application fee is paid. Annual license fee (See Minnesota Statutes 2003. Section 245A.10 - amended by Laws of Minnesota 2005, Chapter 4, Special Session, Article 3, section 4 and article 5, section 6): All other programs with a licensed capacity are required to pay an annual nonrefundable license or certification fee based on the following schedule: Licensed capacity - Fee One to 24 people - $400 25 to 49 people - $600 50 to 74 people - $800 75 to 99 people - $1,000 100 to 124 people - $1,200 125 to 149 people - $1,400 150 to 174 people - $1,600 175 to 199 people - $1,800 200 to 224 people - $2,000 225 or more people - $2,500 A day training and habilitation program serving people with developmental disabilities or related conditions Is assessed a license fee based on the schedule above unless the license holder serves more than 50 percent of the same persons at two or more locations In the community. When a day training and habilitation program serves more than 50 percent of the same people in two or more locations in a community, the day training and habilitation program Is required to pay a license fee based on the licensed capacity of the largest facility and the other facility or facilities are charged a license fee based on a licensed capacity of a residential program serving one to 24 people. A program without a stated licensed capacity Is required to pay a license fee of $400. A program licensed to provide residential -based habilitation services under the home and community-based waiver for persons with developmental disabilities shall pay an annual license fee that includes a base rate of $250 plus $38 times the number of clients served on the first day of August of the current license year. State -operated programs are exempt from the license fee under this paragraph. A mental health center or mental health clinic requesting certification for purposes of Insurance and subscriber contract reimbursement under Minnesota Rules, parts 9520.0750 to 9520.0870 Is required to pay a certification fee of $1,000 per year. If the mental health center or mental health clinic provides services at a primary location with satellite facilities, the satellite facilities are certified with the primary location without an additional charge. The commissioner cannot issue a license or certification until the license or certification fee Is paid. Child Care Licensing Agency Minnesota Department of Human Services Division of Licensing 444 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-3842 Phone: (651) 431-6500 Fax: (651) 431-7673 Minnesota Daycare Listings Head Start - State Collaboration Office Early Learning Services Minnesota Department of Education Child Care Subsidy Agency Minnesota Department of Human Services Child Care Assistance Program P.O. Box 64951 St. Paul, MN 55164-0951 Phone: (651) 431-4005 Fax: (651) 431-7526 Child Care Food Program agency Grants Coordination and School Support Michigan Department of Educatlon https://daycare.com/minnesota/ 2/6/2017 Minnesota Licensing Standards for Day Care Centers - Daycare.com 1500 Highway 36 West Roseville, MN, 55113-4266 Phone: (651) 582-8463 Fax: (651) 582-8494 Post Office Box 30008 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone: (517) 373-4013 Fax: (517) 373-4022 State Child Care Resource & Referral Contact Office of Child Support Enforcement Page 3 of 3 Minnesota CCR&R Network Office of Child Support Enforcement 380 Lafayette Road, Suite 103 Department of Human Services St. Paul, MN 55107 444 Lafayette Road, 4th floor Phone: (651) 290-9704 St Paul, Minnesota 55155-3846 Toil Free: (888) 291-9811 Phone: (651) 296-4085 Fax: (651) 290-9785 Fax: (651) 297-4450 Child Abuse Reporting Hotline To report suspected child abuse In Minnesota, call county law enforcement office or any county Department of Human Services. For national child abuse information, call Childhelp®, 800 -4 -A -CHILD (800-422-4453), or your local CPS agency Homepage Login Sign -Up Forum Toys & Products About Us QC :l -?017 AC;'GC.f�GD�t Contact Daycare.com https://daycare.com/minnesota/ 2/6/2017 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan PC Exhibit G properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among the , making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a le in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second r of development is typically residential; hence the business uses in many c s are in close proximity to individual homes. Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identifi a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to ome: 1) High traffic volumes and the existing traffic m ement infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestri have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and de facility location and inflexibility of bus routes {partially due to th ocation and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cro CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2) Parking availability is a limiting fac or expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3) Beautification efforts are hin ed by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as financial nstraints. 4) Aging buildings are ripe r redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local business to survive and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5) There is little arc tectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. Navarre hasn't d id whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the street, parking ' the rear) or suburban (buildings set back, parking at the front) in c ter. 6) Compa ' >lity of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential nei rhood can become an issue. 7) E30ansion of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to akota Rail Trail. 8) / Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL AREA An additional commercial area is designated along Old Highway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-38 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than `big box' regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally -owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian -friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. The commercial areas along Wayzata Boulevard within Orono are identified in Map 3B-7 and include the following: 1. Property abutting the north side of Wayzata Boulevard from Brown Road North to Willow Drive. This area was reviewed as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1989, resulting in a guide plan calling for commercial uses abutting Wayzata Boulevard with primary access to a service road connecting from Brown Road to Willow Drive, and elimination of direct access to Highway 12. The area is currently bounded on the north by existing residential development at densities ranging from 1 unit per 2 acres to 1 unit per 1.3 acres. The western half of this area has since been developed via PUD as a nursery/garden center with included leasable commercial spaces. The east half of this area includes, a 10,000 s.ff office building, a strip shopping center, a small quasi -industrial machine shop operation, an office - condominium development, and a 62 -unit senior independent living apartment building. The City Council in February 1998 adopted a General Concept Plan for development along Wayzata Boulevard indicating that the Council's vision includes community scale retail development (as opposed to regional or `big box' scale development) focused in a more compact area in or near downtown Long Lake (closer to Brown Road than to Willow Drive, at least in the short term,) for the following reasons: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-39 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Focuses on downtown Long Lake remaining a strong retail area, and helps preserve owner -operated small service businesses in Long Lake which are vital to Orono and Long Lake residents. 2. Focuses on maintaining a vital downtown and "sense of place" for both Long Lake and Orono. 3. A compact retail area encourages pedestrian activity. 4. It is easier to plan, coordinate and control the development of a more compact retail area than an extended retail strip. 5. Focusing development toward Brown Road could strengthen the ability to obtain desirable development on the north side of Wayzata Boulevard east of the Otten Brothers Nursery. 6. Enables better control over the amount of retail development that occurs along Wayzata Boulevard. 7. Provides the opportunity to generate stable jobs in office, high tech, medical, etc. 8. A more compact community scale retail area matches the design of new Highway 12 with no interchanges through Long Lake. 9. Limits the impact on north/south roadways (i.e. increased traffic and activity levels) as compared to the more intense "big box" retail uses. 10. Maintains a lower activity level in the area west of Willow Drive. 11. Would create less pressure for providing an access from new Highway 12 to the retail area. Orono's 2000-2020 CMP reguided the easterly 4 acres of this area to allow for development of senior housing. The remainder of this area should be developed with a mix of commercial uses including retail, service and office components. Access via a service road paralleling Wayzata Boulevard is still desirable rather than direct access to Wayzata Boulevard, since traffic levels are expected to again creep upward, and the long-term need for a service road may again manifest itself. For this reason, it is in the best interests of the City and the business community to preserve at least a partial service road corridor between Brown Road and Willow for future use which will provide all properties with access options other than direct access from Wayzata Boulevard. The City supports the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-40 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan development of a "mid -point" connection to Wayzata Boulevard directly across from Brimhall Avenue or Shaughnessy Avenue, such access to be at least a right -in, right -out configuration. Further, if and when the service road is constructed, all other existing accesses directly to Highway 12 should ultimately be removed. 2. Property abutting the north side of Highway 12 from I low Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road. As part of the 1989 Co prehens. a Plan amendment, the City guided the portion of this area . ectly adjacent to the north side of Highway 12 for commercial deve pment. At that time, the City was not clear about the type of co cial development that 2 CM should be planned for this area. The 2000-20P further refined the intent for this area, establishing that the optim development in this area would be office development. Office develo ent can provide services for Orono residents, can provide facilities f businesses owned by Orono residents, and can, provide quality ployment opportunities. The development of this area for office se versus retail. use enables the Wayzata Boulevard retail area to . a more compact pedestrian - friendly retail area versus a no -cohesive extended strip of retail development. The City's intent ' to have a single tier of office uses between Kelley Parkway and ayzata Boulevard, with residential uses north of Kelley Parkway. Parameters for commercial a of this area are as follows: 1. The area affect is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulev d, west of Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. Allowed u es in this area include professional offices, limited service s, and retail uses accessory to the office use. 3. Acres to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway, Direct access to Will Drive, if allowed, shall be right-in/right-out only. There be no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. 4. ig box" retail uses will not be allowed within this area. CONEWERCIAL LAND USE Lake ac 'Yess and lake user service businesses are appropriate for a lakeside comm ty and require a lakeshore location. Special performance standards are neces to assure protection of the lake environment and protection of nei boring properties. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-41 30 Land Use Plan Citi of Orono Minnesota ,e Land Use Categories Rural (1 unit/5 ac) Rural Residential (1 unit/2 ac) Low Density Residential (0.5-2 units/ac) Low -Medium Density Residential (2-3 units/ac) Medium Density Residential (3-7 units/ac) Medium -High Density Residential (7-10 units/ac) High Density Residential (10-15 units/ac) Mixed Use Residential (6-15 units/ac) Commercial Office Industrial Park, Recreational, and Open Space Institutional Proposed MUSA Open Water Parcel Railroad 4 U Q F.' 0 E? 7 a LA T M N O 101 d r N N O Z 'O O 0 C O a .0 A A .y d d ao a v w 3 `o m ba }gc v y -r e LD FZ W W O + CL -u 5 m 1n d s O C A G u1 R 10 : O Ed J r2 `r m v 1d M PC Exhibit H O 0 '9 V 9 O M a h O D V i. O1 LY 61 h r tn L O GO -y ti C p O al W m L T to O r - G 7E t tll C C V O 10 N w w d ro 7%. r r.+ w O_ C �O mE E E a Q a- tko G CL cr O aL+ c a 7 aa+ m � '� cc n M ?� c L 3 Y N M u w m b L G .c �GQ p�� E c L t bo a L °' E a_ _G cr R a V a N O T d NN p y N i N C G �_ d � EJOU c a It L H R a C 7 h Y b E W O O o y y M ;� G aui ro 2 a a LO m n a b a v c a L i ro C a+ EO 5 wo V 2E C p d 7. d O E E i C N C t c Q +L+ ' L W ro L d rp+ R W 0.1 _ O OLo m a 00 C W a p V V a g1 c ro e L - ro C o V O a L ro w E m M C' U E a. - Z m ro w E V •'- N m f3 4i bO Q m g L ro N i s a o m p o 5 3 u o N 41 a N �J 7 s .Z E C C f. 00Q !p Ti V �- s e il N M1 % � % / w w -i ui m w \ k $ J % � I § f k , 2 ; - % j / ƒ rL 2 J. * ; o 2 0 2 CD % § Id Au � t ■ q ji 2 §. / o 2 o � 2 % § » t o 2 0 ■ m /ka 2 O VO4. o 2 0 $ o t N L Li . 2 ; ƒ � 0 ■ ) Lu m 7 - � k$ $ % ° 8 B 8 C ƒ 8 0 0 za J 4 k § 8 2 k 2 o § 10 o k k � k k / I k k k 44 7 k k 2 k 0 di A w w -i ui m w 0 O m w T O a r Y 3 L vii C p E m m 0 m s 0+ L a °- n u g cg N_ r = E ai c y o Ooo ? 3 5 m o c w ma m c o s vOi C '+0- E W �`N� o 1m+ j R }R. a 0c y E y - }_+ a Y E 0 0) y it .s+ i w i0 c w L U x C CL a UJ ` O X E v °c c c c =m a m w a E S m c ZL a o u +�- _ E m L00 c Wn o a 3 Q ;� L o w a a c ro s o c a 'a m N y T3 c r- ai S �' v c E$ n u -a a o W 0 L$ .a D m w E , m 0� w s a 'Or- L v; c a E c Y c �, vu, d m 2 w .� c c .c o C V = m y o+ o m v= c o E 2 m o 3 $ u V c v y E 2' m> m N c a o y o O y C CL g it d O G �_ = 01 — ro 01 W N W G. C y C 6 W E W 01 �n Oi L O O. O L O O CL M- v a 0 07 '0 0 0 E m m� .� S. a V ui v a+ N v 3 G b u s0_o _m L m o 0 o Y wo E E A c E a m d o L C N N O C L Ca y mMl -oo dyE aao — c O q m E N°, w c o IE t W OC co 6 m a a$ G m a �+ v m n E S. m m E f 0 m m m m u f E s o R o °' c u 4 a c "' yE `-' � 0 G � o f M 'O L a7 bo =` +` a N 4p a m a bo i W O r O N O V = W _ 3'E Z t', a Q E 01 05 c Q. a € c `m o 2o Q' 3 z c& ` u u `m C r_ c bo in E a o w a c c t a o= E d �' c 6u v m 01 c 'o a W E m m CL a m 'u u o u u 0 .� 'v, s vu °u Oci w a o °u a m ou a E N — 3 Q N 6 N v 4. Op 3 o O — Y a o ro 2 m E u E m O �p Y m R m E Qc c a s t E ti 01C m , L" y v % 01 }i � vi .o+ V m .0 L O L 01 q •� V m E c a m m o m ,- 2 m U r a N m w m N o C O. m o w y r x Q c m N ,�, ? m y O s t m Q :E 'N u m E c ani i w c w E A N O E C a d m L ti 7 EO O w ac- TO E L O. •= N u N d E X - a a L C W A s H L m E a m .. Q m m ai �o E a E a y m a a c t E °' , ` o o E L "E o y q ° Y Q o L a c u a N a+ V mo u �m ? C m u E C Ln t m N v c E a °' m c~ R L C O 7 01 00 V t m a s `m d ��^ C a w E m C 01 � O Y N E N w .vs 'm o ,o W 2 C co`0 G a `o ° v c S a tii H a z rE a a F' a vi L od m h = — S G L N o a a X � O W N aL m -mo acoo 3 •` ro o .0 E m 0 5 N +� U c m o o LV A)N N d a m s E c° m O O o m m m a = m � 00 N NO 7 L Cs C 'N T N 7 V C Y m N O. d c" G O 01 L 0i n m m YW m • C a N m m y N d7 L C at a NE a o- O L C m Lkom _ a m u N uVj N a0a r O L 00 '—° m r�i 'a .• a a m °' c d0 s m n a_ `m k` a m o a j vii 3 a m F' CL 0 C b L N tii b6o 3 � 2 c m N L o C Q '" u C C ?^ a " t' Oy� P C L N "p m L m 7 VI 4 V C N L Op C �' L C V R y N J3 0 G to O u a m 0 E L ,a N m b p C O V '6 O m m N A N i N (E 0. bo c c �' a E c v �' p m ir L Y C p V L N a R C QL i L 7 L E V N W 2 bo w L d O tg a C C a0+ W L bo O L Q d V ICO c a `u E Q 0 m N N ` C6 ZYJ = C C O p; }2a N E D '}x.+ o Y L 7 T �O N G _N N 0 H W 2n ILNn m N t R L C Q d Q V OO O c o N L C n a _0 _ W .0 O O C N 'n a L 7 7 O •— L N R C— O d C m °7 E m c E a O i o o 07 do a w w a H u �° .c �-' Lo v c° u 0 m ri tri ui =r- c E '' ¢u L Y 0 w m c L V N _T dl n E 0 m a 7 E v N Qj L w c m V to m c c N m 0 CL eu u W 49 CL T a� G t O [V N N M d N cnv d z a O 0 N at 0 op n n n 11 E lr - Jf R6 I I v- imoil'xannnn\f-lqn ATA\Proiect5\ZOninq.mxd Bridgewater Dr Boulder Dr Sandstone La Stonebay Dr Cascadela Sandstone Ct Cobblestone Ct o o,VON City of Orono ZONING MAP ZONING DISTRICTS Rural Residential 4 Business J RR -1A - One FamilyRural Residential -5Acres IS{ B1- Retail Sales 0 RIM B -One Family Rural Residential - 2Acres B2 - Lakeshore I I � Lakeshore Residential !i� B3 - Shopping Center LR -1 A - One Family Lakeshore Residential -2 Acres I _} B4 - OfficelProfessionai J LR -1B -One Family Lakeshore Residential -1 Acre ? B5 - Limited Neighborhood LR -1 C -One Family Lakeshore Residential -112 Acre I B6 - Highway Commercial « LR1 C-1 -One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict -112 Acre j B-6 PUD - Highway Commercial PUD Residential I Industrial li -One Family Residential -I Acre i I - Industrial R-1 B -Ona Family Residential -112 Acre Recreational Planned Unit Development T RS - Seasonal Recreational --- RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development �l RRA B PUD PRD - Planned Residential Development The Zoning Designations on this map are a representation of a combination of maps, Otlrer ordinanances and City Code requirements which make up the complete City of Orono -J; Parcel Boundary Zoning Regulations. Information on Planned Development is available at City Hall. All rn9� Zoning requirements and Zoning designations on specific properties are subject to change. Section Boundary For updated Zoning information, pleas contact the City of Orono Planning &Zoning Water Body Departmental planning@ci.orono.mn.us or call (952) 24$4620. ' City Boundary This map reflects all valid zoning amendments up to and including Ordinance No. 66, fi Third Series, adopted Pi 11, 2009 - Data Sources: Zoning data created and maintained by City of Orono Planning and Zoning DepaWnent. Parcel data i obtained from Hennepin County Tsxpayer Division. Map crceted by Scnastroo_ { INSET 1 M17, Miles 0.5 - 0.25 0._ 0.5 Feet 3000 1500 0 3000 INSEE 2 a B-1 LR -113 Pit 8_4 I 4B 1 Thi MARCH 2011 111111111111101111111 N III Doe No 4385203 06/11/2007 04:30 PM Certified filed and or reoorded on above date. Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles Tronsl0 319880 New cert Cert 1205041 PC Exhibit I E"Uty 25 Fees $1.50 AF $14.50 STATEFEE $34.00 TDOCFEE $0.00 TSUR $46.00 Total CITY OF ORONO uRArsa0-67 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE LOTS I-6, BLOCK 1, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE DEVELOPER: AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, LLC. OWNER: AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, LLC. THIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND PUD/DEVELOPIVIENT CONTRACT (collectively the "Agreement") is made and entered into this q day of 2007 by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter the "City") and Amber Woods Office Cemr% LLC, a limited liability company (hereinafter the "Developer" and the "Owner"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning application including subdivision to create five (5) building lots and one (1) common lot on one block to be known as AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE; commercial site plan review; and easement vacations for the purpose of developing approximately 34,00 s.£ of office condominiums; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2007 the City Council granted Concept Plan approval for developmetit of the proposed office condominiums per Resolution No. 5585, on the conditions that the Developer fulfill the obligations of the approved Concept Plan Resolution and enter into this Agreement to provide for conformance with the City's Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinances and to provide for the installation and maintenance of site improvements; and on May 14, 2007 the City Council granted General Development Plan Approval per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. '6, i , NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the actual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby wed as follows: I. Property Description This Agreement shall apply only to the following described property luted in Hennepin► County, Minnesota: Lots 1.6, Block 11, AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE thereinafter the "Property") 2. Zoning. The Property is zoned as a Planned Unit Development under the Orono planned unit development ordinance with underlying B-6 zoning, Developer Initial ` City Clerk Initial Pale !, 0!'9 3. Permitted Uses. Within Lots 1-5 approximately 34,000 st of office condominiums consisting of 5 duplex style walk -out buildings are permitted with surface parking at the maim level within Lot 6 as depicted in the site plan and preliminary building pians and elevations. The permitted use of the office condominium buildings is general office uses which may include business and professional offices of a general nature, and may include a clinic for human care on an outpatient basis only. Retail uses accessory to the office use may be allowed with the limitation that within any building, retail uses shall not exceed 5% of the gross boor area ofthat building. Other uses shall not be allowed except by amendment of this PUD Agreement. No accessory structures are permitted within Lots 1 — S. Within Lot 6 the only accessory structures allowed shall include. a) Trash enclosures, constructed of materials comparable to and compatible with those of the building to be constructed within Lots 1-5; and b) Monument identification signs per the approved plans. No other accessory structures ane permitted except by amendment of this Agreement 4. Site Access. Primary access for internal circulation for the Property from Highway 12 shall be via a right-in/right-out driveway access directly to Highway 12 shared with the Orono Senior Housing development, Planned Unit Development No. 2 (PUD No. 2), to the direct east. Surface parking and drive aisles will be provided along the southern and western ends of the Property at the main floor level of the buildings. A secondary access to Highway 12 is provided via access agreements to be granted through the surface parking lot within the Orono Senior Homing site to the east (Lot 2, Block 1, Orono Ambarj, which were required with approval of PUD No. 2, allowing for a connection to Brown Road South and ultimately a firture stoplight at Broom Road South and existing Highway 12. Such agreements will be granted by the City of Orono Housing & Redevelopment Authority, which owns said Lot 2, Orono Ambar. The parking lot and driving lanes within the Property are additionally designed to allow for firhrre vehicular connections 1) at the northwestern comer of the Property for a future frontage road to Outlot D, Sugarwoods; and 2) to the adjacent parcel at 2120 West Wayzata Boulevard (PINS No. 34-118-23 24 0001). The Developer shall enter into cross ingress and egress agreements with the City, the Orono Senior Housing development, and the City of Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The easement agreema" will be required as part of the final plat to allow for public vehicular use of new and existing parking lot connections between the properties and to provide for new connections should they be developed at some future date. 5. Development Plane. The Property shall be developed in accordance with final plans (the "Plans") which shall first be certified by the City Planning Director as being in conformity with the approved plans described bellow and with the provisions of this Agreement, The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans am.- Developer re: Developer Initi Pa$s 2 of 9 City Clerk Initial A. Final Plat B. Cover sheet CO -1 dated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheet C1-1 dated 4-2-07 D. Removals & Erosion Control Plan sheet C1-2 dated 4-2-07 E. Site Plan sheet C2-1 dated 4-2-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet C3-1 dated 4-2-07 G. Gradin WPPP Plan East g/Dramage/S (pond revisions) sheet C3-2 dated 4-2-07 H. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP sheet 0-3 dated 4.2-07 L Utility Plan sheet C4-1 dated 4-18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile sheet C4-2 dated 4-13-07 K. Detail Sheet C8-1 dated 4-18-07 L. Landscape Plan sheet LI -1 dated 4-13-07 M. Lighting Plan sheet L2-1 (undated) N. Monument Sign Plan sheet dated 1-15-07 0. Dumpster Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. Retaining Wall Plan sheets 1 thru 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Plans Cover sheet TS -1 R Lower Walkout Level Floor Plan sheet A-1 S. Main Level Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Loft Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Front Elevation sheet A-4 V. Walk -Out Elevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A-5 X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 The Plans are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD); the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and subject to any additional requirements and conditions specified by the City Engineer upon review of the Plans. Construction of the buildings shall be in conformance with the building codes and regulations adopted by the City. Any substantial changes to the gross square footage, footprintitwall/roof dimensions or defined building height shall require a prior amendment to this Agreement. Developer initial -?g Page 3 of 9 City Clerk Initial vements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the ng described public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the vements") shall be constructed, installed and maintained by the Developer ng to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement: Site grading, roadways and driveways, curb and gutter, parking lots, sidewalks, retaining walls and all necessary erosion control measures per the: approved Grading and Drainage Plans (hereinafter called "site grading improvements"); Construction of sanitary sewer and water connections, and construction of storm sewer lines and facilities as required (hereinafter called "stormwater improvements') per the Utility Plan referenced herein. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated over entire Lot G as part of the final plat. Underground natural gas, electric, cable and telephone service to be arranged by the Developer with the utility companies involved (hereinafter called the "other utility improvements"); Landscaping and site revegetation improvements per the approved Landscape Plan referenced herein (hereinafter cal led "landscaping improvements"). Traffic control signage subject to approval by the City Engineer and Public Services Direomr. F. Any additional improvements listed within the Site Improvements Cost Estimate attached hereto as Exhibit A (thee "Estimate"). 7. Construction of Improvements A. Commencement Date — Construction of Improvements shall begin no latex than 2007 H. Completion Date — All Improvements shall be completed no later than ..] K JO 30 2M7 (2 years after start date). The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. if an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. C. — The Developer shall select, retain and supervise the contractor(s) responsible for construction of the Improvements. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of each such contractor. Where required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first obtain a license from the City. D. Pie-Consttuction Cnn�e — Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and the developer's contractor shall meet with the responsible City officials to review construction plans and schedules. Developer InitialW14 Pie 4 of 9 City Clerk Initial E. Penni - Prior to the start of any construction, the developer's contractor shall apply for and deceive all necessary permits for the lmpravcrnents from the City and/or government agencies having jurisdiction. Site grading shall not commence until a land alteration permit bas been issued. Developer is advised that an erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as well as the required NPDES construction site permit, before commencing any grading activity on the site. F. Construction — The construction, installation and materials shall be in accordance with the Plans approved by the City. G. jupid — The City, through its staff and/or consultants, shall inspect the installation of the Improvements to ensure compliance with the Plans. The cost of such inspections will be paid by the Developer and are anticipated to be approximately $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 but could exceed these mounts if major problems arise. An escrow account in the amount of $15,000 to cover the costs of inspection shall be established with the City by the Developer. H, Insurance — The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any portion of the Improvements to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmen's Compensation, Liability and Property Damage (with coverages consnt with industry standards). 8. Performance Security, For the purposes of assuring to the City that the Improvements will be completed according to the terms of this Agreement, and that the Developer will pay or will cause to have paid all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished, the Developer or its general contractor will deposit with the City prior to issuance of site grading and building permits an irrevocable letter of credit (LOC) from a local (Twit, Cities area) financial institution in a form satisfactory to the City, providing that the City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Improvnerrts if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the completion date specified. in Section seven (7) above. Further, if the required improvernem are not completed at last thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the LOC, the City may also draw on the LOC. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. The amount of the LOC shall be 1500A of the estimated improvement costs, The estimated improvement cost is $713,723.75; therefore, the LOC amount shall be $1,470,585.63. As substantial elements of the Improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, the City will authorize reduction of the LOC in an amount equal to 154°'16 of the cost estimate for that phase of the improvements deemed complete, but in no case shall the LOC be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until all Improvements are complete and accepted by the City. The LOC shall expire no sooner than one year after the completion daze specified in Section 7 above, to allow for at least one fi ftw cycle for parking lot settlement. Security to ensure survival of landscaping vegetation shall be retained for eighteen (18) months after planting. Developer Initial (� City Clerk Initial Page s or 9 9. Fees and Expenses. The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for all the variable additional expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, but not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other professionals, which are not covered by City application fees, 10. Notice. Required notices to the Developer and the Owner shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, the Owner, their employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer and the Owner by registered mail at the following addresses; Notice to Develog_er Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC Philip Carlson P.O. Box 184 Wayzata, MN 55391 otice to r Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC Philip Carlson P.O. Box 184 Wayzata, MN 55391 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address; Orono City Offices, 2750 Kelley parkway, PA. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323, Telephone 952-249-4600. 11. Additional Condition A. Turning radiuses of fire apparatus access roads on the Property shall be designed subject to approval of the City Engineer and Orono Fire Marshal. B. Fire lanes will be marked with the appropriate street signage and yellow curbing. Orono Fire Marshal will determine fire lanes upon review of the Plans and final access routes and at that point determine exact placement of signs and yellow curbing. C. The walk -out elevations of the buildings shall be as set out in Document C3-1 of the constmction documents dated March 20, 2007 unless modified with the approval of the City Engineer. D. Storm sewer facilities which lie outside of public right-of-way shall, be privately owned and maintained by the Developer until the end of the period of Developer control of the association at which time they will be maintained by the Amber Woods Office Center Association, E. All sanitary sewer and water connection lines within the Properly shall be owned and maintained by the Developer until the end of the period of Developer control of the association at which time they will be maintained by the Amber Woods Office Center Association, Developer Initial Pale 6 of 9 City Clerk Initial -AK/ F_ No site work or construction shall commence until the Developer has paid the Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee as established in Concept Flan Resolution 5585. The MCES Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) are the responsibility of the Developer and shall be paid to the City at the time of building permit issuance for pass-through to MCES. G. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits from the regulatory agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Heald'+, MCES, Minnehaha Creep Watershed District, Minnesota DNR, MPCA, and MnDOT. H. The Developer shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles fotmd during construction. The Developer will comply with the City Engineer's direction as for as abandonment or relocation of the drain tile. I. The Developer shall provide the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval for all material imported or exported from the Property. if the material is to be imported or exported tolfrom another site in {iron, it should be noted that those Other parcels will be required to obtain a land alteration permit, and potentially a conditional use permit from the City. L The Developer shall obtain a temporary construction easement from and establish permanent maintenance agreaments with the owner of the property directly west at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard for construction and maintenance of the necessary retaining walls. 12. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Agreement are documented in City Council Resolution No. 5f 3 adopted by the City Council on May 14, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference. Additional conditions of approval are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Developer Initial City Clerk Initial Page 7 of 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Developer, and the Owner have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF ORONO By: Lj4'i%r' (MW) By: /' 46e/ (City Clerk) DEVELOPER - Amber Woods ce Centre, LLC By: Its: l Chief Mads Reviewed for Administration: Date: S =/-!� - By: This fnstrumeM was dmfted by; City of Ormo 2750 Keir Parkway P.O. Bax" Crystid Bay, MN M56 STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Developer Initial ?§", Page 8 of 9 City Clerk Initial COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this �" day of Mw - 2007 by James M. White, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. LRACHEL DODGE ,air T IN coin it I Notary Pub is STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF IEINEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this! Tday of 2007 by Linda S. Yee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHELOODGE NOTARY PLKC • WHINE MA Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me thisl3 Tday ofa 2007, by Philip Carlsonna , Chief Mager, Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation, on behalf of Amber Woods Office Center, LLC. LINDA S VEE NOTARY PUBLIC-WOEM aY Camd11 �paes,I� 31, �t� STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN X 7 v� ezt-" Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of2007, by Philip Carlson, Chief Manager, Amber Woods Office Centre, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation, on behalf ofAmber Woods Office Centre, LLC. UNDA S. VEE i IOTMyft" • MP M%0TA Notary Public _ �Oti�OmnliBtiohl pfr�sJA3I,2010 Developer Initial Page 9 a!9 City Clerk Initial MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FIRST COMMERCIAL BANK, a ^%nee n CP'*,-,%ftr''-t which holds a nwrtgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Planned Unit Development Agreement and Development Cont W, agrees that the Planned Unit Devdopmebt Agreement and Development Contrast shall remain in full furca and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated: , Mck-, 14 , 2007. FIRST' COMMERCIAL BANK M L - i STATE OF MINNESOTAAOL)AdEhL � { ss. KVMW P lwa-Mr asao� COUNTY OF Wd i,n ) �1roo�at�uoMINO V sea The ft w&Ding instrument was ac MWIedged befrnte me this2`i� day of Ma - 2007, by _ BAroAlem _k . Mmey ... and Seio ,^ W019~, the PVxid*^4- •t LE() and vim Fr%si of FIRST COMMERCIAL BANK, acoeeisruAr;Ar%on its behalf. NOTARf PUBLIC DRAFM BY: Prq%sWndA0*dWan 317 Bsgndak Otflae Cbnur 1384 Cogwft Carter Cnw Femur. Mots 55121 Tdep rt = (551)452-M SRN 13M82Grr01 ORONO/Amber Wands Office Centre SRN:03121tZ00'F PUD NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT EXMI T A - SITE A PROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE 3121;12007 Amber Woods Office Center Plat 07.3250 Cost Estimate for Financial Guarantee (160%) Sanitary Sewer Im ents Units Qty $Knit Total McbMuNon LS 1 $ 6,ODD.00 $5, 00.00 TimFcControl LS 1 $ 1,000.00 $1,000,00 Canned to Usting 0" Sanitary Sewer EA 1 $ 2,500.00 $2,500.00 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 360 $ 30.00 $10,800.00 6" X 6" Wye EA a $ 100.00 $6W.00 4' Diann ter Sankey Sewer Manhole EA 4 $ 2,000,00 $8,000.00 4' DiarneW Sankey Surer Maathole Overdepth LF rz To IOU -00 $2,200.00 -hmmyed fte Foundatlon LF 400 $ 1.00 $400.00 Es*nated Construction Cost . $30,400.00 Water Main fm rovements Units ek $/Unit Total Remove Existing Watennrafrn Pipe LF 200 $ 5.00 .$1,200.00 Remove Hydrant EA 2 S 600.00 $1,200.D0' Connect to Existing Water Main EA 2 $ 2,500.00 $5,000.00 8" DIP Water Main LF 700 $ 40,00 $30.400.00 6" DIP Waller Main LF $5 $ 30.00 $2,550.00 8" Fittings EA 16 $ 250.00 $8,760.00 Meulat m SY 10 $ ' 10.00 $100.00 Hydrant EEA 3 $ 2,600.00 $71500.00 r Gv end Box EA 2 $ 1,300.00 $2.600.00 W Gv and Bax EA 3 $ 1,200.00 $81600.00 Es*raftd Co+nstructlorr Cost $57.900.00 Services Irn rovements Units Qty. EnIt Total IV PNC, Service Pipe LF 355 $ 22.00 77810.0D 1.S kwh Dopper service LF 305 $ 16.00 $4,880.00 1.6 Brch carp EA 6 S 200.00 $1.000.00 1.5 inch curb EA 5 $ 250.00 $1250.00 Estlawed Construction Cost $14,90.00 Storm Sewer Units 535 $ $/unit Total Remove Exlsft Storm Sewct pipe LF 15 $ 7.00 $105.00 Connect to Existing StnAm EA 1 $ 11500.00 $1,500.00 15" Storm Seaver LF 1,183 $ MOD $335,480.00 2' x T Cath Basin EA 2 $ 1,5W.00 • $3,000.00 48" Catch BnsiNMarbvie FA 18 $ 2.000.00 $30.000.00 EdhWed CoeatrucUon Cost TN 2.100 $ 14.OD $70,085.00 Remove Retaining Walls LF 535 $ 7.010 9,745. A Remove Curr and Butter LF 30 S 6.00 $160.00 Grading LS 1 $175,00D.OD $356881.88 $17UMAO Retaining Woo SF 800 $ 26.00 $1$0,000,00 Fence LF 81 D $ 20.00 $16,200.00 Subgrade Preparation SY 4,135 $ 1.78 $7,236.25 Aggregate Rase. Class 51OD% Crushed- 8" (Cy) TN 2.100 $ 14.OD $29,400.00 Concrete Curb and Guft B618 LF 1,840 S 11.00 $16,040.00 Surmountable Curb and Gutter LF 44 $ 10.00 $440.00 t3itLlmbvw Base Course- 2" TN 605 $ 50.00 $25=.00 $lturnhous Weer Course, -1 1fd" TN 378 $ 56.00 $20,790.00 Bituriib= Material For Teck Coat GAL 210 $ 200 $420.00 Concrete Skkmtk SF 7,715 $ 4.60 $34,717.50 Striping LS 1 $ 31500.00 $3.500.00 Singage LS 1 $ 500.00 $5D4 00 Landscaping LS 1 $ 45,000,00 $46,000.00 Tomp Bresion Control LS 1 $ 10.000.00 $14,000.00 EaWnsted ConWudlon Cost a6ao_3e9.74 SwbrySnw $ ,4 AO Waw Main $57,9D0.00 Services $14,940.00 Storm Sewer $71,095.00 PWWM Lot / Grading / LendscaplEg$540,388.78 Totlal Estimate Construction Cost $713,723.75 $356881.88 Total for Financial Gumntee $1,070,586.63 PUD NO. 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT EXHIBIT B Additional Terms and Conditions 1. The Improvements include the items listed within PUD NO, 2C AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and as enumerated in Exhibit A of said CONTRACT. 2. The Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans as stated in the CONTRACT, and with the pertinent conditions of approval within the General Development Plan and Final Plat Approval Resolution {Resolution No. IS -&I A adopted by the City Comicil on mirl 2007. I All conshuction traffic related to development of the Amber Woods Office Centre shall be routed directly to Highway 12 through the approved direct access location at the southwest corner of the Senior Housing site, or through the adjacent commercial site to the west if allowed by that owner. Use of the Senior Housing access to Brown Road shall be avoided for ail construction traffic. 4. Construction and contractor parking, materials storage, fie. shall not occur on the Senior Housing site. 5. Developer shall take all due precaution to avoid construction activity encroaching into the adjoining residential property abutting the north boundary of the site. 6. No land alterations shell take piece until erosion control is established and the City Engineer has approved all finals improvement plans. No building permits shall be issued until all drainage facilities and improvements have been installed and satisfactory parking lot & driveway base (including base and initial lift of bituminous) has been installed, and approved by the City. i. All buildings on the Property shall be constructed according to final pians which shall first be certified by the Planning Director as being in conformity with the approved plans. 8. Developer shall provide the City Engineer with two (2) full -sine sets, and shall provide the City with 2 foil -size sets and one set reduced to I I" x I r, of final site improvement plans, two weeks prior to commencement of land alteration activity. s CITY of OBONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5613 A RESOLUTION GRANTING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C FOR AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE LLC AND APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE AND VACATING EXISTING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS FILE 007--3250 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laves of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application by Amber Woods Office Center LLC, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the "Applicant") for subdivision and development by the Planned Unit Development process of property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Orono Ambar, Hermepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the `°Property" ); and on March 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5585 granting General Concept Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 2C, and on March. 26, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5592 granting Preliminary Pial Approval for the plat of Amber Woods Office Centre, which approvals include the following elements: 1. Subdivision platting of Lot 1, Block 1, Orono Ambar to create five (5) building lots and one (1) comion lot to be known as AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE; 2. Commercial site plan approval and conditions for proposed development of office condominiums; 3. Vacation of existing easements; and CITY of OBONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5613 A RESOLUTION GRANTING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2C FOR AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE LLC AND APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE AND VACATING EXISTING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS FILE 007--3250 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laves of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application by Amber Woods Office Center LLC, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the "Applicant") for subdivision and development by the Planned Unit Development process of property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Orono Ambar, Hermepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the `°Property" ); and on March 12, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5585 granting General Concept Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 2C, and on March. 26, 2007 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5592 granting Preliminary Pial Approval for the plat of Amber Woods Office Centre, which approvals include the following elements: 1. Subdivision platting of Lot 1, Block 1, Orono Ambar to create five (5) building lots and one (1) comion lot to be known as AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE; 2. Commercial site plan approval and conditions for proposed development of office condominiums; 3. Vacation of existing easements; and CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 563 WHEREAS, the Applicant has agreed to execute Planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract providing for the installation of certain improvements as a condition of site plan approval for the construction of office condominiums on the Property, and which agreement documents the general and detailed conditions for use and development of the Property and replaces previously approved PUD Agreement No 2A; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has agreed to execute cross ingress and egress easements through the Property and through the adjacent Orono Senior Housing property with the City of Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority, to allow for future vehicular connections at the northwestern corner of the Property for a future frootage marl to Outlot D, Sugarwood% and to the adjacent parcel at 2120 Wayzata Boulevard Wee; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: Completion of all platting requirements of Concept Plan Approval Resolution No. 5585. 2. Dedication on the plat of a Drainage and Utility Easement over entire Lot 6 (otherwise known as the eommorn lot). 3. Submittal of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit approving the grading and stormwater management facilities plan for development of the Property as proposed per the "Removal Plan", sheet Ci -2; the "Grading & Drainage Plan West", sheet CM; the "Grading, Drainage & SWPP .Pian (East)", sheet 0-2; the Strom Water Pollution Preven ion Plan, Sheet C3-3; and the "Utility Platt" sheet 41; all subject to review and final approval by the City Engineer - 4. Payment to the City of the Storrawatcr and Drainage Trunk Fee for the development of the Property in the amount of S 19,302.84 based on a Tnmk Fee of $7,320 per acre and gross acreage of Property at 114,868 s.f or 2.637 acres including portions subject to trail and sidewalk easements. 5. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat documents, agreements, casements and covenants in the amount of $280.00 plus incurred review and filing costs. 6. Payment of the final plat review fee in the amount of 5254.00 plus incurred legal and engineering charges. 2 CITY of 080N0 RESOLUTION OF T� 613 CITY NO. 7. Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all mcordcd easements currently affecting the property. MMMAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for #his PUD and subdivision application and hereby specify approval of each attached plan and identify them as part of the official mord for Planned Unit Development No. 2C: A. Final Plat B. Cover sheet C0.1 dated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheet Cl -1 dated 4-2-07 D. it etnn,rals & Erasion Control Plan sheet CI -2 dated 42-07 E. Site Plan sheet C24 dated 42-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet 0.1 dated 4-2-07 G. Gradk90rai M9dSW'PPP Plan East (pond revisions) sheet 0-2 dated 42-07 H. Stomerovater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP sheet CM dated 42-17 L Utility Plan AM C41 dated 4.18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile sheet C42 dated 4-13-07 K. Detail Sheet C&1 dated 41847 L. Landscape Plau sheet L1-1 dated 4.13-07 M. Lighting Plan sheet L2-1 (undated) N. Monument Sign Plan sheet dated 1-15-07 0. Dunvsier Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. Retaining Wall Plan sheets I dere 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Plana Cover sheet TS -1 R, Lown Waumut Le"I Floor Plan shat A-1 S. Mair: Level Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Loft Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Front Elevation sheet A-4 V. Walk -Out Elevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A -G X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 3 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 613 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 'used on the findings of Resolution No. 5585 and Resolution No. 5592, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE, Hennepin County, Minnesota and grants General Development Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 2C, subject to the following cotnditions; I . General Development Plan Approval and Final Plat approval and Commercial Site Plan approval is granted subject to condi#iow established within Resolutions No. 5585 and 5592, and subject to the conditions established witla the planned Unit Development No. 2C Agreement and Development Contract and other pertinent documents. 2. Ficial building design plans for the buildings shall be subject to City Council review and approval prior to issuance of permits for said buildings should the Planning Director Find that there are discrepancies between those attached to this Resolution and those submitted far building permit. Building permits and land alteration permits will not be issued any sooner than 24 hours following filing of the plat with Hennepin County. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be tiled with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office on or before November 14, 2007 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the agreements, easements, and covenants pertinent thereto. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, hereby declares that the easements dedicated over the Property in accordance with development of Lot 2, Block 1, Orono Ambar, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be vacated upon filing of this Resolution and Developer's Agreement No. 2C with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. ATTEST: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5 6 13 Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 14th day of May, 2007. Xds �- J &t., J-.-, M jvti;6 Linda S. Vee, City Clerk +Jam M. White, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SIN The foregoing instrument was aclmowledged before me on this �y of 2007 by James M. While, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation nd said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. - - � j.� ���-� .rte -r_. rr_ s sem- 1_✓1.-� Notary Public STATE OF MIlWNESMA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this t,,,� day of a ul 2007 by Ueda S. Vee, City Cledc of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipai corporation ind said ftwtrurnent was executed on behalf of the City. 121 � � t w ATTACHMENT: APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS A. Final Platt B. Cover sheet CO -1 dated 4-2-07 C. Existing Conditions sheat Cl -1 dated 4-2-07 D. Removals & Erasion Control Plan sheat Cl 2 dated 4-2-07 E. Site Plan sheet C2-1 dated 4-2-07 F. Grading & Drainage Plan West sheet 0-1 dated 4-2-07 G. GradMOUn�WPPP Phan East (pond revisions) sheet C3-2 dated 4-2-07 H. Storm Waster Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP sheet C3-3 dated 4-2-07 1. Utility Plan sheet C4-1 dated 4-18-07 J. Sanitary Sewer Pian and Profile sheet CO2 dated 4-13-07 K Detml Sheet C84 dated 4-18-07 L. Landscape Plan sheet L14 dated 4-13-07 M. Ligbti ng Plan sheet 1.2.1(tmdated) N. Monument Sign Plain shed dated 1-15-07 4. Dumpster Enclosure Plan sheet dated 1-12-07 P. Retaining Wall Plan sheets 1 than 10 by Civil Solutions Group LLC dated 3-30-07 Q. Building Plans Cover sheet TS -1 R. Lower Walkout Level Floor Plan street A- l S. Main Leval Floor Plan sheet A-2 T. Loft Level Plan sheet A-3 U. Frau Elevadon sheet A-4 V. Walk -Out Flevation sheet A-5 W. Side Elevation sheet A-6 X. Side Elevation sheet A-7 NE WITH 34' OF SPACE) © 4" SOLID LINE LINE EPDXY GR IN (YELLOW) N (WHITE) O 4" SOLID LINE IESSAGE LEFT ARROW EPDXY GR IN (WHITE) 10 GR IN (WHITE) INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIAL j EX. RAW DP 1 ;, K R 7 �C It CSAH 112 <EEi 12B>- - _ � � 1 ' — 0 � 1 ' S o Boa Ir scale In feet i EX. R✓W— 1 SHAUGHNESSY AVE <SHAU> 1 ` 1 _ , 1 n PC Exhibit J NOTESi OA 10- CURB TYPE TRANSITION, PAID SAME AS ADJACENT CURB. © MATCH EXISTING Q SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEET NO. 150- 157 FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. INDICATES DETAIL NUMBER SEE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS ON SHEET NO.163r173. � 4 + )100 LEGEND r 0 50f 100 kut @scaleIn feet CE goo + GENERAL NOTES: SEE SHEET 136 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 1 l ! T VI EX. R/W , CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 21 9` 60 � � EX. R/W SZ OR 2 Cur D r +� N1-36` 861 OV\ -t + ` k - 36, 32' '-- - -J Z 1 of, i. +57.5 -1-1m 4.3 14' 12' 4600 14` E �C { --� A D _ 6� WALK O 1 EX. R/Wr7 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 1 EX. R/W D-' L� NSS 2()I0 \4 AO ANS rL CS AH 112 + CEB112B> 91 vwg 8612 C&G- r � 1 206g Q EX. R/W 1 n 115 3.0-- BITUMINOUS TRAIL \` SEE INSET B, PLAN SHEET NO.60 -' 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6612 C&G SEE INSET C, PLAN SHEET NO.60 COMMERCIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON ' SEE INSET G, PLAN SHEET NO.60 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY ®COMMERCIAL SEE INSET F, PLAN SHEET NO.60 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY ®RESIDENTIAL ,SEE INSET E, PLAN SHEET NO. 60 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL D, PLAN SHEET NO. 60 r 0 50f 100 kut @scaleIn feet CE goo + GENERAL NOTES: SEE SHEET 136 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 1 l ! T VI EX. R/W , CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 21 9` 60 � � EX. R/W SZ OR 2 Cur D r +� N1-36` 861 OV\ -t + ` k - 36, 32' '-- - -J Z 1 of, i. +57.5 -1-1m 4.3 14' 12' 4600 14` E �C { --� A D _ 6� WALK O 1 EX. R/Wr7 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 1 EX. R/W D-' L� NSS 2()I0 \4 AO ANS rL CS AH 112 + CEB112B> 91 vwg 8612 C&G- r � 1 206g Q EX. R/W 1 n 115 !� O .E. \` 1 6612 C&G RETAINING) WALL A ' Mx�O SNC. !� O .E. �c \` 1 �c AMBER WOODS OFFICE CENTRE DUMPSTER SCREENING FRONT VIEW MEM CLAD GATE METAL (3A SONG AMBER MOODS OFFICE CENTRE DUMPSTER SCREENING Q SIDE.. REAR VIEWS - METAL aM SONG _AMBEROODfiICE CNEW 2060 WEST WAYZATA BLVD., (zONO_, MN PC Exhibit K IlV'TERSPACE--WEST. INC. PO BOX 184, WAYZATA. MN 55981 Pit 952-2441117 FX 952-249-1118 EMAIL jaimmmemedad -41 i Y •YiY YIYIi iY i ■YY � • Y■ YY lAlll !HlA� #!� IIIIII 1� 1111 p 11111 11l lilts 1 Asti I,I 1i'lllii! '."- �� �� ■ata ltalli !11 :I II t1111 411111 111 1!11,111 t rnu n CD CONNECTExPLoRER" V... tAl It esti-' w. '4+ ... P;. '+ :: ■�.''�� w kF r Ad A 1 " a 4a. ILL . b VPR k. map. Auto - 04117/2D15(,7,3)15)- < knege I W 4 > << PC Exhibit M C.ON N ECTExPLo REw �. 1� `+..�1l.ny isI ��I .�ti 1F" -t _ /4�'T e' �, I �. of ��� A ♦,� p. IX '17� ! fir^•' q 4 3 �'.Y.1!9 _6■�E._ 4 N map: Auto - 045 1 712015 (2015) - -C image # of 4 i �'}4► arm ?_ _ r T v • '� _� 'fit r i « s� 0 � d I klu le J z ...i=a. 14__ - �r.iw.w...vwT...w (CON NECTExp LoRER* ►7 WON I , y� r � r r I w , now ml , r '� , lira+ �¢�� �� 4 �• . . map: Auto - 04117 15 (201 a) - C irrop 1 of 4 M G � , � pq Yt Ilk WON I , y� r � r r I w , now ml , r '� , lira+ �¢�� �� 4 �• . . map: Auto - 04117 15 (201 a) - C irrop 1 of 4 M G � , CONNECTE PLORERO I Cir reap: Auto - 04/1612015 (2015) 4 Image 1 of 7 ? � � r CON NECTEXPLDRERm Fli At t BMW 11.. 44.- 0'.._. �, �' fes: 4 map: Amto,. 041172015 (2015) -< lffmge I of 4> m G GO - ••J � Use Avery® Template 51600 38 34-118-23 21 0002 ORONO STATION WEST LLC 2160 W WAYZATA BLVD ORONO MN 55356 38 34-118-23 210021 ROMY M ACKERBERG STUART I ACKERBERG 2102 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0022 PAUL D ANTONENKO ELIZABETH R ANTONENKO 2104 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0023 R M SCHOMMER & E M SCHOMMER 2106 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0024 MICHAEL UJACQUELINE M RICKS 2108 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0025 GEORGE E & MARILYN MILEUSNIC 2110 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 21 0028 SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC CIO FRANK PINGTENS 2007 SUGARWODDS DR ORONO MN 55356 38 34-118-23 210030 SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC CIO REBERS FAMILY LLC 2640 OAKLAND RD MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 34-118-23 21 0033 JEANNE MORK BREDESON 3848 SUNSET DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 crena aluPop u nne e Feed Paper " expose Pop-up Edge— AVERY(s) 5960Ts 38 34-118-23 21 0037 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 PC Exhibit N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 210038 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118.23 210039 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 210040 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 24 0001 ORONO STATION LLC 2120 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 24 0072 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 34-118-23 24 0073 CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 575 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RIECEIVED 38 34-118-23 21 0036 ORONO HSG &RDVLPTATHY�� „�� 2040 WAYZATA BLVD W z LONG LAKE MN 55356 J'3 3 OI101 YQ 8", 98 owl ltiquettes faciles A peler Utiliser le gabarit AVERIf� 51 fi0® e Sens de Repllez & la hachure afin de' www.averycom 1 charoement rdv8ler le rebord Pop-up 1 -800 -GO -AVERY Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 1117nn17 PC Exhibit O J. DICKEYS LAKE = 27,418-23-33 27-118-23-34 27-11812'3- 43 i 3 m - 34-118-23-22 4.118-23-2 34-118-23-12 � 3 34-148-23-12 _.34-118-23-22 34-11 &23- 34— _ « Z4 s w a 34-118-13-24 344 18-23-23 Ra , 3,- 1 _� r Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: 3411823210037 p t�++ �y— CBS MN PROPERTIES LLC RECEIVEDFor more information contact: 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West Hennepin County GIS Office Orono, MN 300 6th Street South 55356 JAN 17 ZOV Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us CITY OF ORONO 4-3898 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3900, Scott Kirchner, 1090 Heritage Ln, Variance— Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. The applicant seeks a lot area variance in order to process a subdivision exception request for a lot line adjustment. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and was considered to be complete on January 17, 2017; therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on March 18, 2017. 3. Background. The existing lot of record is substandard in area for the LR- lA district where it is located. The lot was created in 1965 as part of the Foxhill neighborhood which predates the creation of the 2 -acre minimum requirement. The lot is currently 0.98 acre in area. The survey is as provided to the Planning Commission, annotated as PC Exhibit C, and in the resolution as Exhibit A. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On February 21, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested lot area variance. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. PC Staff Report & Exhibits Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Prepared By: Melanie Curtis Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: D5^ CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 FILE NO. #17-3900 WHEREAS, the property owner made application for a variance from the lot area requirements for the property located at 1090 Heritage Lane and legally described as: Lot 6, Block 1, Foxhill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the variance request is necessary to facilitate a boundary line adjustment between the Property and the adjacent property located at 1780 Shoreline Drive; the Property will not meet the 2.0 acre minimum lot size; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Property at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby [approves/denies] the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3900. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1 A Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.98 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 295 feet. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The Property is within Tier 3 and hardcover is limited to 35% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. The following variance has been requested: a. Lot area variance 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The lot area variance requested is consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The size of the Property is generally consistent with the other properties in the Foxhill neighborhood. The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variance allows the redevelopment of the single family lot, this use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance allows the nonconforming nature of the lot to decrease. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The owner wishes to develop the Property with a single family home in the future. The owner has requested a lot line adjustment via an administrative subdivision exception in order to increase the area of the lot by approximately 3,900 square feet. To qualify for the subdivision exemption the lot area variance must be granted. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The owner did not create the substandard lot size. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The proposed variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood as most of the Foxhill properties are similar in size. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The nonconforming lot area of the Property is not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The Property is generally consistent with the neighboring properties with respect to size. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The size of the Property coupled with the 2 -acre district setbacks create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variance is necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow development of the Property with a lot area 42,688 square feet (0.98 acre) where 87,120 square feet (2.0 acres) is the minimum required, subject to the following conditions: Council approval is based on the survey dated 01/10/17 by Gronberg & Associates, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the property owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by formally adjusting the common boundary line between the two parcels within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 13, 2018). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. This resolution will be recorded in the chain of title of the Property. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR SCOTT KIRCHNER & ROBERT NELSON OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1, FOX BILL & TRACT B. R.L-S. NO. 1719 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA lz- s iAR L TRACT C 4, 'mss "'°�,� 9.98' AL'RE9 WORE` lrJ k 1.oT- ,ACRES AFIE1i ` Z4� 11 LA -�,- a TRACT B R_,p A 3.37 AfirtS f[50RE r N i e ACT A °SL I" F(3[ES AFTER EMTW LEGY CCSWT-76 : Q Sr,1r r s, N � KPD- ER d I Lal 4 r0xi4L 4 5 ELSOu f irate B, IF to Lora Swasy Na 1:59, 14er of RrvyaaV of Title¢ Hemg;n I d ianly. Ysvieaot¢ 5 ysP n TD K nFFr•-n rRUY WL5 M IU D+IC'R = s 5 1 Ie.M - L of True! & R•q:a'.wrtl Lv-0 SLrrry Na 1719, lira et Aapslna al Y1tka• 1 ' Her 1. :CW. y, aLa¢b 1, y:np rs I.wrsspwy � a Mews frame k. II' Co. a1 Lae 6, BaeA 1, F to m. aeye port r. eke Iwiy (na al adtl 9E a m >s �!o¢t Ta.76 fret Ikwiy, m a.ew.raa �a'a we ensl My i ria Yat ,a¢¢1 I'm sarrw ur�imtl Lat 6 - PRtPMED LEI:µ DESf -K)h$ = E � Lot 6. Rose 1, FQXF1 L. yQ I%I Rwt IF Ir¢t1 9, Ray VW .LAO rW L3+swy L'aa �wq rgrinryA[rIV ur a Erw w '• Irum Ine mcs[ r tw yy e �� RurM in SM au•S y Me Of we LOt 8 eiLiV�.I 76 T6 Irtl hd fPxrFj,. as ww d Wep •wd eaLtery [fie, Vara Ileo apsl ao,Alsa y m o rao Oce 6. '!V •.. �•- } - NELSON tract B, iep 1 ed Lme 9urey FG. iTty Fair or Rupsk of "Iar Ibnapu, i. -Q�yl� 'Cumly�p�wrrel e t vge Ilk lyf1, Al. In M Fro tLi I. trp -at I IT � Lu2 6, kRucA 1, fD%IlL Iu� an wara po- . '.r taa r b,ti p i^1 nY W of rab L 1 s 6lterl. 7E.7tl Net ad1¢MI a ahrW Gala eaf [e•Sy b+. 'yP�r Sa rrmr In.. Ma¢p amulMr y avref. or .ore •: eaoMaa srn++nn eer 1 s `��.,'�s T. vt w•., J @—N. Mara ara t,maa ww[ m auurw4 mY.en WE Rm„ea r er:ae-oe I— OF 1-1 B a taL from a IOOI W,by &a 0b;. to � LAKE MINMETONRA R[Ia wrAY vrWl. IR Wwa tM beviYV In ¢f Ira• aura ee—r d eraRrrtlar, fhr beeribn al ra�rtnq aa,r• vu a!'w«rmy ¢a Traet dl, " 1. aroo— bcal:en ala yq—w Sr,;dry L !festa. 1 Baer rM WRnt to aTa- Vry aplpr %rpraab[�la V aatra9daorrta- PROJECT GRONSERG & ASSOCIATES, WC t-to-trCIVIL SNGIK77. LI?R 8i1R96TOFA LAND AL4%B£AS r.L r wrca cna: tea.. w: �s�:a '44T ♦'3-a [ap Date Application Received: 01/17/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/17/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 03/18/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 21 February 2017 Subject: #17-3900, Scott Kirchner, 1090 Heritage Lane Lot Area Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a lot area variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The existing lot of record is substandard in area for the LR -1A district where it is located. The lot was created in 1965 as part of the Foxhill neighborhood which predates the creation of the 2 - acre minimum requirement. The lot is currently 0.98 acre in area. Additionally, the applicant has made an application for a subdivision exemption for an administrative lot line rearrangement between the subject property and the Nelson property at 1780 Shoreline Drive. The proposed lot line adjustment would increase the size of the subject property, but not meeting the requirement of the district. Therefore, the lot area variance is needed in order to process the subdivision exemption. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 - Setbacks: LR -1A Required Front 50' Rear 50' Side 30' Side 30' Wetland 35' Section 78-305 - Lot Area/Width: LR -1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' 42,688 s.f. (0.98 acre) Current Actual 295 , 46,609 s.f. (1.07 acres) Proposed FILE # 17-3900 21 Feb 2017 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1403- Structural Coveraee: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 42,688 s.f. (0.98 acre) Current 46,609 s.f. (1.07 acres) Proposed Allowed (based on proposed lot area): 6,991 s.f. (15%) Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover* Existing Hardcover District Tier 42,688 s.f. Current 16,313 s.f. 0 s.f. Tier 3 46,609 s.f. Proposed (35%) (0%) *Based on proposed lot area Applicable Regulations: Lot Area Variance (Section 78-3031 The property has 0.98 acre in area and is substandard for the LR -1A (2 -acre) district where it is located. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The lot area variance requested is consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The size of the property is generally consistent with the other properties in the Foxhill neighborhood. The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance allows the redevelopment of the single family lot, this use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance allows the nonconforming nature of the lot to decrease. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. FILE # 17-3900 21 Feb 2017 Page 3 of 4 The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner wishes to develop the property with a single family home in the future. They have also requested a lot line adjustment via an administrative subdivision exemption in order to increase the area of the lot by approximately 3,900 square feet. To qualify for the subdivision exemption the lot area variance must be granted. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the property owner did not create the substandard lot size; and The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood as most of the Foxhill properties are similar in size. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The nonconforming lot area of the property are not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The lot area is generally in line with the neighboring properties with respect to size. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The size of the property coupled with the 2 -acre district setbacks create practical difficulties affecting the subject property; the variance is necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. FILE # 17-3900 21 Feb 2017 Page 4 of 4 Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the lot area variance. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Aerial Photos Exhibit E. Code Sections Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map City of Orono Variance Application 61OA : Applicat n # / 7- 39',00 rso Kerrey Parkway Orarro, MN 553$6 6 Date Received: /—/7—/7 Staff: M C— Main: e52 -24945o© tax 952-248.4818 Fee: 799-0 Maffing Addraw P.O. Box 66 Escrow # & $ Ta o Crystal Bay, MN 65823-0066 Permit Fee Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. l SITE LOCATION: �V� ell q !I &VA DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: a' i all 1 1'a d�yCri}; lrAS . (attached additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT / AGENT INFO ATl N: Applicant Name }i h&hAcC Phone (Primary): .. l fq S Applicant Email: A f-, LofA Address: C : trltde ZIP: j' i31 Applicant Is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION, 0 check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: Rs, MvA A. f.;PYu, Phone (Primary): 6- Z3 7, & G -- -- - Mailing Address: d- Ci a ZIP: Email: APPLICANT/AGENT ANDIOR OWNER: • Agree to provide all Information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay addillwal fees (staff time not covered In the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hislher knowleciga. The applicant and owner mcognite that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it Is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential maria • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents. Commission and Council Members for purposes of Investigation and vari6cation of this request • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant andror owner is unable to attend a scheduled rneeling, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the appiiocanNowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your prolec t. AppfcarWAgent Signature: 1 ApplicantlAgent Signature: Property Owner Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Data, Variance Asolieation —Bray 2016 �2 RECEIVED JAN I .2017 '3 9 0 0 CITY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2. "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. S(,A- W-1It4,w\ First Middle Last Address fAk?Cbrt)je /AAl ��311 137 - City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. Signature Variance Application — May 2046 RECEIVED Page 40 JAN PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, unite NIA in the space provided' 1. "The proge_ly owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." ��jj// M 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." IV�K 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." Af i P, 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." Aft w RECEIVED Variance Application — May 2016 Page JAN 1 72017 43900 CITY OF ORONO 7 "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." S. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." A`. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): t r j RECEIVED Variance Application — May 2616 Page 5 JAN 17 ?017 _;CITY OF ORONO PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, subdivision 6(2), the following is a detailed description of the demonstrable practical difficulties with the property located at 1090 Heritage Lane within Orono. The City of Orono has 12 points outlining the basis staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. Upon review of the 12 points as well as the variance request, 6 of the points pertain and relate to this variance application. The points will be referred to hereafter as Practical Difficulties Criteria # (PDC#) and are as follows: PDC2: "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner" PDC3: "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality" PDC8: "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining properties" PDC9: "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located" PDC11: "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code" PDC12: "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as it convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty" The following Practical Difficulty Statement is respectfully submitted based upon the aforementioned Practical Difficulty Criteria: PDC2: The property located at 1090 Heritage Lane is not a standard shape in that the adjoining property extends 80 feet from the rear and then 105 feet to the side. There are no other lots within the Foxhill neighborhood that have such a shape or complication to them as the other lots within this neighborhood are squared off. The extension of the neighboring lot, coupled with large minimum building setback requirements and a wetland on the lot, a pinch point is created on the lot. At this pinch point, the narrowest point is 21 feet. Not only is the shape of the lot unique to this specific property, so is the pinch point in comparison to other lots within the neighborhood. These circumstances are unique to this lot so much so that a city staff member stated in an e-mail; "considering the challenges with the property some level of variance may not be out of line..." The current lot lines and associated challenges with them are pre-existing and are not a result of me as 1 did not develop the area or the lots. PDC3: With the current lot lines and shape, 1090 Heritage Ln is in fact the smallest lot within Foxhill according to the Hennepin County Property Tax website. 1090 Heritage Ln is 0.98 acres in size. With the exception of one other lot, all other lots within this neighborhood are equal to, or greater than 1.00 acre in size. If approved as is, the amount of property added to the lot at 1090 Heritage Ln will be 0.09 acres, bringing the total lot size to 1.07 acres. The proposed 1.07 acre lot size is consistent with, or RECEIVED At' 39 JAN 17 2017 ® CITY OF ORONO PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION smaller, than the other lots within the neighborhood. The one other lot that is less than 1 acre is located at 1190 Heritage Ln and is 0.99 acres in size. The lot at 1190 Heritage Ln however, is not shaped in an abnormal manner that would complicate building on the property. Based upon the size of the other properties within the same development, granting of this variance and eventual lot line adjustment, would not alter the essential character of the locality. PDC8: As stated previously, the other lots within this development are larger and feature a square or rectangular shape. Although some other properties do have possible wetlands present on their property, the lots do not have an abnormal shape and therefore construction of a reasonable structure, while complying with minimum building setbacks appear to not have been an issue. Also detailed previously in this statement is the fact that the lot in question is in fact the smallest lot within the development but is also the only lot that is outlined in such a manner that it makes it extremely challenging to build a reasonable structure on the lot. PDC9: The lot located at 1090 Heritage Ln is in fact a unique lot in the manner in which the property lines were designated. There are no other lots in the Foxhill development or surrounding area that appear to have a similar shape creating challenges on the property. PDC11: The intent of the Zoning Code for this area is residential single-family homes on a 2 -acre lot with large minimum building setbacks. The lot as it stands is already a non -conforming lot in that it is not 2 acres in size and in fact is not even 1 acre. The intended use with approval of this variance is still a residential single-family lot. In no way would this variance undermine the intent of the Zoning Code, and it would in fact allow for the lot to be closer to compliance of the Zoning Code. PDC12: The demonstrable difficulty associated to this lot is the building pad allowed based upon the current lot shape. While applying for this variance, I reviewed the Existing and Proposed Hardcover worksheets. The hardcover worksheets are an official City of Orono document that are required for some variances, and are published on the city website with the variance application. On the hardcover worksheets, the city has listed an example of hardcover being a garage. The dimensions listed for the example garage are 24'00'. Based upon an official survey of the lot under the current conditions, it would be impossible to place a garage on the most practical portion of the lot using the city's example dimensions of 24'x30'. We are not requesting this variance as a means to detract from the character of the locality; we are merely seeking approval of this variance so that a suitable building pad would be established on the lot. With approval of this variance and subsequent lot line adjustment, this would likely allow for future construction to comply with all minimum building setbacks without requesting a variance of those regulations. RECEIVED ,JAN 1 _(Z017 900 3 CITY OF ORONO z F4 z Ey z C) :0, cd 0 E- ul >,, Z dye 56 z z g -Z �T4 Z o z 0 s S 00*24'46" E 612.17 1 . .... . ....... ... .. . .. LLI 0 m ow E- (Av) LJ LULU C > oo z 71555 W3V 46"W E-1 w ---- ------ E-sL. C�3 64 to.o z % < z �i 0 U ........ ...... al� i 0 Z J'y 0 E o-5 z, e E 0. 2. �4 z > o 0 E wo V) 0 0 �l 'r V; c v) 31 I �A fl� 0 0 E. BV Lxj w VAN 0 11 . 6 o:G QZ 6 -., '0 o Lj E E- > — cy; 0 co a wo 12— o,- 0 SgQ fr MO 00 0 '8'y — 0 ID 0 mlo .0 0 ol 0 0 fl! c; cc o v V c 0 of — I I c oyz z —o'! o _741 w --L b 't— 6:F o wo 0 w 0 3o: w x OZM �Wt�— loo E m V C CL Q Ed w , OZ 0 O H o> o o o 0 .6— Cqi E m g 'A 0 o Km�5r �o z m tp O 12o U7 L1 j 6!00 3y A4 a Flol u 0.0 'o X 0, LJ Y z EL Q- z 0 U - � .� X § u]| LL 0- |§]W . 2.[_. 3 Wow ii . ` « 9z- »|§ . ■,:�-• §\|! | | ,.,. § | r [ / w `` )�k ©w$ / § k § & uf m m z ldh a z $%( !««� - ) s �2 . � ! \ - .C4 : \ 5 _ ». . RECEIVED « � } JA N 7 7017 } CMCW ORONO 0 so 120 GRAPHtC SCALE IN FEET -.-T,VwlW Ualf.VIVE-P Rp .W'ORUA470*i PPOWDED t;Y CL�.,E U SWUREAP (Anwo- LOTS --6---AND 7 BL FOXHfLL HENNEPIN COON 7 RECEIVED JAN 1 7 7017 CITY OF ORONO # 3900 i Y IL 411 -IRO c Aft ' As g � a46 c r �2e fl i15A P-mN 0 L I r 4 Sec. 78-305. - Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR -1A district shall exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Side Yard Lot Lot Front Side Rear Adjacent Area Width Yard Yard Yard to Street (acre) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 2 200 50 30 50 50 Sec. 78-1700. - Specific tier regulations. Per the official stormwater quality overlay district map, each property in the stormwater quality protection overlay district is assigned to a protection tier based on its relative distance to receiving waters. This protection tier dictates the specific protection measures that must be implemented. (1) Tier 1 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross lot area. (2) Tier 2 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 30 percent of the gross lot area. (3) Tier 3 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. (4) Tier 4 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross lot area. (5) Tier 5 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 85 percent of the gross lot area. Page 1 RUN DATE: 01104/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 10-117-23 110002 38 10-117-2313 0016 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH FOXHILL ASSN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1105 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY FOXHILL ASSN REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY NANCY BJER-KE 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 1035 HERITAGE LA MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23.20005 38 10-117-23 13 0021 KELLY B KROMER LOCKIE B MARKUSEN 1005 HERITAGE LA 1135 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KELLY B KROMER LOCKIE B MARKUSEN 1005 HERITAGE LA 1135 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-2313 0001 38 10-117-23 13 0023 ?ATRICIA A ABBOTT WOODHOUSE SHORE' -INE LLC :000 BROWN RD S 1800 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PATRICIA A ABBOTT WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 408 PARKERS LAKE RD 4112 600 HIGHWAY 169 S 4701 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 38 10-117-23 13 0004 38 10-117-23 13 00,24 ANTHONY A NICKLOW WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1150 HERITAGE LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ANTHONY A NICKLOW WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1150 HERITAGE LA 600 HIGHWAY 169 S 970: WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEA?OLIS MN 55426 38 10-117-23 13 0005 38 10-117-23 14 0005 KURT E & A SUZANNE RETZLER DENNIS L LIBBY 1100 HERITAGE LA 1000 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 5539', KURT E & A SUZANNE RETZLER DENNIS L LIBBY 1100 HERITAGE LA 1000 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 13 0006 38 10-117-23 14 0016 RAYMOND A LIPKIN C NELSON & R W NELSON 1090 HERITAGE LA 1780 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RAYMOND A LIPKIN ROBERT & CAROLYN NELSON 161 FERNDALE AVE S 500 SE 5TH AVE UNIT S8C2 WAYZATA MN 55391 BOCA RATON FL 33432 38 10-! 17-23 13 0007 38 ',0-117-23140017 GO' -DEN EMPIRE LLC WOODHOUSE SHORELINE LLC 1080 HERITAGE LA 1760 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO YIN 55391 GOLDEN EMPIRE LLC WOODHOUSE SFORELINE LLC :330 JERSEY AVE S 600 HIGHWAY 169 S 9701 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 38 10-117-23 13 0008 S L BYRNES JR & P S BYRNES 1025 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 PAMELA & STEPHEN L BYRNES JR C25 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 5539; 38 10-117-23 13 0009 ELLEN M FRITZ TRUSTEE :035 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ELLEN M FRITZ 1035 HERITAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 ]0-117-23 RECEIVED DER JAMES A SNYDER ETAL 1085 HERITAGE LA ORONO MN 55391 ELAINE D SNYDER JAN 1 7 2017 1 1085 HERITAGE LANE WAYZATA MN 55391 3900 CITY OF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED JAN 1 ! p �i 39004 CITY OF ORONO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of Q iS .5 I't G I )k 5 C_ I - A [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 101110 Rff 'kA a 5 t I -A also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improveme t plans and that the propos neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. .� = r 1-7-17 er Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) of 1036 F'r_r`Xcky e In [print name(s)] [print address) havereviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1040 H Aft l a t L1 also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, i (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 1-7-17 er - Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED Variance Application - May 2016 Page 13 SAN 17 2017 1113900 CITY OF ORONO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM (we) _ Rek Z t ( of 1100 1Ae P,krA 1 e. Ln [print name(s)] [print addr ss] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1010 0ff, 4-a 2 r L4 also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. MtmAtb tr A} 1, 1- - 1117 VA a 1*0 ,b a�I- Property Owner n � i � b Mfg Date C t'^115 RaM � Of ry- l Aelhbors cfk"sisl A _FG- 11,1, i rflL' 04,4, W i UL 11 . Property Owner Date M If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM [print name(s)] of [print address] have reviewed the pians for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application — May 2016 Page 13 # 390(? RECEIVED JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO _ Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Rea! Estate Services Date: 1/4/2017 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 1090 Heritage Lane Orono MN 55391 RECEIVED 1011723130006 JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO 0 120 240 480 ft I i i i I i i! For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennapin.us -' Ile 10-117-23-12 r:. f4' ` t p,. V 10-117-23.13 f 10-117-23-14 f 1 17 13-13 �,, i , / 10-117-23-14 Y' i 10-117-23-42 10-117-23-41 10-117-23-42 10-117-23-41 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 1090 Heritage Lane Orono MN 55391 RECEIVED 1011723130006 JAN 17 2017 CITY OF ORONO 0 120 240 480 ft I i i i I i i! For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennapin.us MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffron stated Orono's standards only apply to the B-1 and B-3 districts at this time. Landgraver moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3899, Little Acorns Child Care, 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West, granting of a conditional use permit, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 4. #17-3900 SCOTT KIRCHNER,1090 HERITAGE LANE, VARIANCE, 7:16 P.M. 7:24 P.M. 4 hAr NN NN N1 NNNNNN N fNN 1NNN NN NNNN Scott Kirchner, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the subject property is an existing lot of record that is substandard in size for the LR -IA district. The lot was created in 1965 as part of the Foxhill neighborhood which predates the creation of the 2 -acre minimum requirement. The lot currently consists of 0.98 acre in area. In addition, the applicant has made an application for a subdivision exemption to allow an administrative lot line rearrangement between the subject property and the Nelson property at 1780 Shoreline Drive. The proposed lot line adjustment would increase the size of the subject property to 1.07 acres but would still not meet the requirement of the district. The additional land will make the buildable area larger and possibly avoid setback variances for the development of the lot in the future. A lot area variance is needed in order to process the subdivision exemption. Staff finds there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the lot area variance. Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot area variance. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Scott Kirchner, Applicant, stated the survey shows some of the difficulties that were encountered with the lot, including a wetland near Heritage Lane. Due to that wetland and the building setbacks, the lot is very Page 12 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. limited with regard to the building envelope. Kirchner stated by purchasing the adjoining property, it will help square off the lot and eliminate some of the future complications with the building pad. Landgraver stated it is a reasonable solution to a challenging problem. Thiesse commented it will still be a challenging lot. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. Dennis Libby, 1000 Heritage Lane, stated he would like to compliment Staff for making the very prudent recommendation of approval. Libby stated this is a prime example of adjoining neighbors cooperating and doing something constructive to solve a problem. Libby stated he would recommend strongly that the City approve the variances and allow a home to be built on the site. Libby noted under issues of consideration in Staff's report there is a difference in elevation that has not been addressed by the architectural drawings or platting. Currently there is a 40 -foot drop between the upper lot and where the building pad is on this lot. Historically that drop has caused a lot of water during heavy rains to collect on the road surface. Libby stated the drainage system has not been very well maintained, and when it does not work correctly, the water drains under and over the road to a private property and then down to a community pond. When that is working properly and maintained, it works very well, but when it is not, there is a lot of standing water on the roadway, which causes issues with freeze/thaw and traffic. Libby stated he would suggest the City review that drainage to ensure it is working properly as part of this application process. Curtis noted the applicant is not proposing to develop the site at this time, but at the time a structure is proposed for the site, the City Engineer will be reviewing the plans and drainage. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Schoenzeit commented the application looks fine and is more administrative in nature. Landgraver moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3900, Scott Kirchner, 1090 Heritage Lane, granting of a lot area variance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 13 of 48 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 10 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: #17-3904, Laurel Ulland Architecture/Martha Meyers Head, 2090 Shoreline Drive, CUPS Variances— Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report Purpose. The applicant is requesting two CUPs and a variance to reconstruct a guest cabin. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and considered to be complete on January 18, 2017; therefore the 60 -day review period expires on March 19, 2017. Background. The existing guest cabin on the property is within the floodplain and was damaged by the 2014 flood waters. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct and elevate the building. Because the construction and elevation will be done using helical piers rather than fill material a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The existing cabin was constructed prior to the guest house CUP requirements. A guest house CUP will be required because the guest house cabin is being reconstructed in a different, expanded footprint and is in a nonconforming location. Additionally, the new guest cabin will require an average lakeshore setback variance; the cabin will meet the 75 -foot setback requirement. The proposed plans are as provided to the Planning Commission, annotated as PC Exhibits D and E, and in the resolution as Exhibits A and B. 4. Planning Commission Comment. On February 21, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 6 to 0 on a motion to approve the CUPs and variance conditioned upon the applicant's withdrawal of their initial request to permit the northern stoop to be located less than 75 feet from the OHWL. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance and CUPs relating to the new guest cabin. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. PC Staff Report & Exhibits Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Prepared By: Melanie Curtis Reviewed By: J. Barnhart, CDD Approved By: D5^ CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-303 & 78-1126 FILE NO. 17-3904 WHEREAS, Martha Myers Head is the Trustee of the Martha M. Head 2014 Qualified Personal Residence Trust (hereinafter the "Applicant") the owner of the property located at 2090 Shoreline Drive and legally described as: Attached as Exhibit A (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78- 1279 to allow construction of a replacement guest cabin lakeward of the average lakeshore setback as well as permit a stoop to encroach up to 8 feet into the 75 -foot lake setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-303 to allow a guest house use; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1126 to allow the proposed guest cabin to be elevated above the 1 % Flood Elevation using helical piers; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2107, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant originally applied for a variance to permit encroachment into the 75 -foot lake setback; following the Planning Commission's discussion and public hearing, the Applicant withdrew that portion of the request; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance and conditional use permits; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2017 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance and conditional use permits as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3904. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1A Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 3.76 acres in area. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARIANCE PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The proposed location of the guest cabin does not block lake views of the adjacent property owners, and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The average lakeshore setback variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The average lakeshore variance request is residential in nature and is reasonable considering the unique nature of the Property as a large peninsula on the lake. The relatively large flood hazard area and existing improvements on the property creates difficulties in locating a conforming structure. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The location of the structures on the Property and configuration of the lot were not created by the property owner. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The cabin's location within the average lakeshore setback will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Rather, the cabin will not impact views from the lake nor will it appear to be more visually obtrusive than the existing cabin. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a guest cabin/guest house is an allowed conditional use in the LR -1A District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The Property's location and orientation as a peninsula, functionally an island, is unique. Due to the nature of the Property on the point, the application of the average lakeshore setback requirement causes a practical difficulty. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The Property's location on the lake is unique and applies primarily to this Property; the application of the setback requirement combined with the challenges of the flood hazard area restrict the ability to improve the Property without a variance, creating a practical difficulty. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The guest cabin can be reconstructed in kind. However, the minimal relief from the ordinance allows for functional improvements to the footprint, retaining the character of the lot and are consistent with the existing cabin. Relating to the average lakeshore setback, this condition is met. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." The proposed project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Granting of the variance will resolve and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty caused by the application of the average lakeshore setback applied to the Property. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the City Council finds that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1. Consistent with the community management plan; Relating to both the CUP for elevation on piers, and the guest house use, the proposed use is residential in nature and residential use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this neighborhood. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The guest cabin is in a nonconforming location, however requested variance, if granted would make the proposed improvement compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; Relating to both the guest house use and the elevation of the guest house on piers, the proposed uses will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Staff believes this criterion is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; Staff believes this criterion is met. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed guest house elevated on piers is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The guest house elevated on piers is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. The flood prone nature of the area requires adjustments similar to those proposed. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the proposed guest house is expected to be residential in character and consistent with that of the principal structure on the Property. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The use of the guest house elevated on piers is not expected to have any adverse impacts. No information has been presented to indicate such. Construction on piers will be less intrusive than bringing in fill, and will have no impact on the existing flood storage on the Property. 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The guest house will be situated similarly to the existing guest cabin on the Property and will not be significantly visible when viewed from off the Property on the street side, and the views from the lake will be primarily from the bay. In the opinion of staff, additional screening or buffering will not be required. 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. guest house elevated on piers is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; It is anticipated that the proposed guest house elevated on piers will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed guest house on piers has been designed to conform to the historic architecture of the existing structures on the Property, and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant is hereby advised of this requirement, and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. Staff believes this criterion is met. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78- 1279 to allow construction of a replacement guest cabin lakeward of the average lakeshore setback; a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-303 to allow a guest house use; and a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1126 to allow the proposed guest cabin to be elevated above the 1 % Flood Elevation using helical piers, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey dated 01/09/17 by Egan, Field & Nowak Inc., and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits B & C. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the approvals will expire on that date (March 13, 2018). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 7 2090 Shoreline Drive (legal description): CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. #17-3904 Exhibit A That part of Government Lot 1, Section 15, Township 117, Range 23, and of the accretions in said Section 15, described as follows: Commencing at Meander Corner No. 63 located on the north line of said Section 15; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 59 seconds West, assumed bearing along said north line, a distance of 458.47 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of the St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba (Great Northern) Railway; thence South 17 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds West, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 1292.86 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 72 degrees 52 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 6 feet, more or less, to the shore line of Lake Minnetonka; thence westerly, southerly, northerly and easterly, along said shore line to a point on said westerly right-of-way line distant 360 feet, more or less, southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence North 17 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds East, along said westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 360 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Together with a nonexclusive appurtenant easement for ingress and egress in that part of said Government Lot 1 described as follows: Beginning at a point on said westerly right-of-way line, distant 1628.91 feet south from the north line of said Section 15, as measured along said westerly right-of-way line; thence South 72 degrees 52 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 62 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 35.36 feet; thence North 17 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 178.60 feet; thence South 72 degrees 52 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 25.00 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of the St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba (Great Northern) Railway; thence South 17 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds West, along said easterly right-of-way line, a distance of 203.60 feet; thence South 62 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 35.36 feet; thence North 72 degrees 52 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 75.00 feet to said westerly right-of-way line; thence North 17 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds East, along said westerly right-of- way line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the point of beginning as set forth in CR Doc. No. 8518737, Hennepin County, Minnesota. m m 0 z w 0 m c M > m 0 n w c m 0 P? CD w CL 0 N 0 oo m w m 0, 0 0 , (j) �? 0 = 0 Z 0 M m EL 0 Z 0 o v As A ii, 4 J -H 4) A < Az z cp :P--;; z 0, > 0 > 'o > 05 qw c F 7 H �M z z -2.2hi Nall N M 0-! zo m Biggs, > m M > c < gpi m .Tom :m m cr gl! 41 "GRe4 7—� 0,�G-IOAI 'o --- ----- 414*4);j IQ .4. *0 ------ pp < Az z cp :P--;; z 0, > 0 > 'o > 05 qw c F 7 H �M z z -2.2hi Nall N M 0-! zo m Biggs, > m M > c < gpi m .Tom :m m cr Ln M > C: 7- Z 03 C) > C1 z M ;0 -0 z 10 _0 1 1 46 _0 .. 0 a X > M 1 3: m 14 16 M x L3: 0 CD SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -9� M Project I hereby certify that this plan, Issue -'t - - --- - - - - - - - - - - -- * specification or report n""'='1",6sr` '.',`Y,�Lu'e,'d.d was prepared by me or under U land d �1 e d � . 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my direct supervision forueorthi,prj-,r1y,L A and that I am a duly Licensed —the-th—and—,re. and retain, 11 cmm,n Sh.Tt ORONO, MN 55391 - - - - - - 4L wet, ry,,dlh,r,,,—d 'U�irgr,pyright. Any ntIhrs��r 1'�'554co LUJA R"I" Date 16117 By r.'. ul_ _ -r iW.— of the de.igre, reng.ments 612 8 4 -6 p FEI U N DATI C1 N Registration # tolb—tinn —W,ned ith.ul b> PIER PLAN the pri., written ns-'te'ai'LN1. WWy p.hibi.d. F- - - - - - 5 Z L 1 71 E: T---7 L — — — — — - 1, P , - "' 0 r 02, E z L — — — — — - 0 > < m 'L -J I r m 3: I F- -1 z I r 0 0 :E z 1 it L_:- -J1- 1 — — T I �UL —J L 0 a X > M 1 3: m 14 16 M x L3: 0 CD SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -9� M Project I hereby certify that this plan, Issue This d,.wog i. p—id. MARTHA HEAD RES. specification or report n""'='1",6sr` '.',`Y,�Lu'e,'d.d was prepared by me or under U land d �1 e d � . 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my direct supervision forueorthi,prj-,r1y,L A and that I am a duly Licensed —the-th—and—,re. and retain, 11 cmm,n Sh.Tt ORONO, MN 55391 rd.r Architect u the Is— of the State of Minnesota wet, ry,,dlh,r,,,—d 'U�irgr,pyright. Any ntIhrs��r 1'�'554co LUJA R"I" Date 16117 By r.'. ul_ _ -r iW.— of the de.igre, reng.ments 612 8 4 -6 p FEI U N DATI C1 N Registration # tolb—tinn —W,ned ith.ul b> PIER PLAN the pri., written ns-'te'ai'LN1. WWy p.hibi.d. = -Z Z J, 0 r Z Z @ 0 0 < Ln C: > M 0 M ;B C] 11 1 0 M En C -i [TI z 0 En -4 0 0 rjn a tn 0 M z T z z r— M M r- -0 z SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project MARTHA HEAD RES. 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, — ONO, MIN 5539 1 Sheet artify that this plan, =tion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I duly Licensed Architect under the Ia— of the State of Minnesota. Issue Thi. dramrg is p—ided as n ln—.- f S—b. by L-1 Jiland A,,hit-- -- bt-dod for use o, this prq,d—ly LOA a'. the -11, . f th.. —um.m.— rd —bar nd rat.h. .11 -r?dmon aw.—ry-doihe,be—a �i,'hbib1ud!n.,. ".Pr'd �b "o . �,h'tb�%y.' the designs, am.rg—rts or infmation—Win.,hen,ib th-1 —;l Ol� d —1— 171 lo --- 'M"-i,55M3 LUJA . 8,4 10M p 6117 By LEVEL Registration # )�.nMAIN the prior nuen —ent of LU 1. PLAN WbUy prohibited. UI 0 C -0 0 F ;0 r, F F z 077 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project I hereby ertify that this plan is... This d.Wng is —id.d s .. MARTHA HEAD RES. specification or report instrument of S—e by I....1 was prepared byme or under Jll-dl �,hrt,— and is nWndWd 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my gre, up. 1,,.,t- on he ORONO, MN 55391 and that I am a duly Licensed a .==LU of JWs. instrument. and Win. .11 mm.n hWat It..t th Arch undert a W— of the State I Min ..W. co I— tat-, and oth—es, ed rights, ind,ding ,pynght. LUA 611Z By Wpod.11., Wo or dlmdo� th. d—nn. slr.n,—c- — th.ul 'pn.,'�',iu'r"='.T'LUA UPP ER LEVEL Registration # > PLAN t"h"e 1. tddy prohibited. uI :E I] M > 0 r, C: M 7 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION pmje�t I thereby certify that this plan, Issue Thmdr—,rg,,P,,md, n MARTHA HEAD RES. + + V was prepared by me or under U,,ad Architect— 3' , wrdsd 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my direct fr ... an N. progt rly '"p and that I am . duty Licensed am th, a,um, end 'w"mLUA instrum.- -d nuen. .11 = U. I U11 -d A111ft,1111 - i' Sheet 0 NO, MIN 5539 1 Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. law --ry ,d th,r ra—d i -c-lil�d right, , -'yng t. 1718 W�- A—, S,,�,Ilh 6128 10M LUJA 6117 By �H W mprad . — r dim.".Mf the d, i armng,mers p 0 Registration # 0 S So U + WEST U T 17E7LEVATIONS SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION pmje�t I thereby certify that this plan, Issue Thmdr—,rg,,P,,md, n MARTHA HEAD RES. peciricahort or report insmmen of —m by L -ml was prepared by me or under U,,ad Architect— 3' , wrdsd 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my direct fr ... an N. progt rly '"p and that I am . duty Licensed am th, a,um, end 'w"mLUA instrum.- -d nuen. .11 = U. I U11 -d A111ft,1111 - i' Sheet 0 NO, MIN 5539 1 Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. law --ry ,d th,r ra—d i -c-lil�d right, , -'yng t. 1718 W�- A—, S,,�,Ilh 6128 10M LUJA 6117 By �H W mprad . — r dim.".Mf the d, i armng,mers p Registration # S So U + WEST U T 17E7LEVATIONS inf.- tion —Winad mrsin itimul > V flmpn.,.n—.n.n1.fl-U Mmdy p.hibi.d. in -0 0 > > 7 P1 z > z z 0 0 0 ;0 ;0 > M M < > Z --i Z M 0 z 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project I hereby rfify that this plan, Issue Thi pro�d.d .. n MARTHA HEAD RES. speciflostion or report =i. in.tr S.M. by La—1 was prepared by me or under jil.nd Archit.dure -d m jr-d.d 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my direct supewision 1,,ruhl:," and that I am a duly Licensed a au==L' f 0— In.trument. and t.ire .11 c.,mm.n -,zl U11 �d —h -- R 0 Sh-t NEI, MIN 55391 Architect under the laws of the State of Min esota. I "t' and �herl'h t,eZ ad rh1Vind%n' . '4 ny . ... ...... ..... Mi—p 1.�, 55403 ", LUJA 6117 By reprod.rfi., — r ft.l.s.m of the dl��rgrs, —rgarn-ta or jn�rm,ti .. ... tai -d h—in , th,u] - — P . RTH Registration # VATI 0 N ��O th.p,i.,.ritt.r-nsant.fLU 1. W.dy pr.hibitad. SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project I hereby certify that this plan, issue r,is d—ing is p—id.d ., .� MARTHA HEAD RES. specilication or report ..burn -t of S.M. by La—1 was prepared by me or under U11 -d! An,hilecture and is intended 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, my directsuperyision '.,r.th: on f MN 55391 and that I am a duly Licensed .U==IU 16'" instrum-ts and retain, all , n 1-1 UJI��d Allh�-- Sh..t N 0, th Architect under t a laws of the State of Minnesota. la� statutory and other —,TTo rights, ind,din.g.mpyright. Any LUJA Date 1 By 611Z md-im, —di.d.eurc& fh.de 11.1 �' 11 Id— EAST+ WEST Registration # grs, s0—:t— rts,ra� ha,— � th,W > ELEVATION the p,i,, —ft .. .... ert f LUA 1, sun,dy prohibit,d. z ;a In z 'U > z ;o 0 1 (71 C x P! + 6�. 10 r. F 0 0 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project MARTHA HEAD RES. 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, ORONO, MIN 55391 I hereby certify that this plan, peolticaton or report was prepared by me or under my direct ",,,,n "P ly Lic and that I arn a d ensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Issue This d—irg I, P,,Idd s or nst—ert of Sx.. by Ls.'l U,,ad 5.,�— ands ' tnd.d fr u.— this pmj-t.nly,,LUA ar.th—th.—d—re fdh ln,t,,,nt, nd retain, All lwttt, Oght" in�jn nd th,r nss, 'i; cop sA�y.f rap,.,�cti.o I uss ryd'!'.h' r. the d.ign., mang.m.nts r inf—atim —taire,l h—in with,ul k, 554M LUJA 874 1 M6 p a 6117 By L D I N G Registration > 7BSUSI CRO SECT] ON t,.pd.r.r.n-n-nt.fLU 1. i.tly .hilbit.d. Date Application Received: 01/18/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/18/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 03/19/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner YYIGG Date: 21 February 2017 Subject: #17-3904, Laurel Ulland Arch itectu re/Martha Meyers Head, 2090 Shoreline Dr, Conditional Use Permit: Guest House; Elevating a structure on Piers Variances: Average Lakeshore Setback; Lake Setback; and 75' hardcover Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following: 1. A conditional use permit for the guest house use in order to reconstruct the existing guest house with a different footprint; 2. A conditional use permit to reconstruct the guest house on helical piers; 3. An average lakeshore setback variance for the guest house; and 4. A lake setback variance and hardcover variance to permit an entry stoop to be placed within the 75 -foot setback. I Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval, see page 7. 1 Background The home and guest cabin on the property were constructed in the mid 1920's. While a portion of the lot is below the 1% Flood Elevation, (formerly known as the 100 -year floodplain), the existing home has been elevated above the flood elevation. The existing cabin sits lower on the property and has not been elevated above the flood elevation. The cabin was damaged by the 2014 flood waters and the applicant would like to reconstruct and elevate the building. Because the construction and elevation will be done using helical piers rather than fill material a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The construction of the guest cabin will require an average lakeshore setback variance as well as a lake setback variance for the northern stoop to be located approximately 67 feet from the OHWL; the cabin will meet the 75 -foot setback requirement. Additionally, a guest house CUP is required as a CUP has not been issued, and the guest house cabin is being reconstructed in a different, expanded footprint and is in a nonconforming location. #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 2 of 7 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305. 78-1279. & 78-1605 - Setbacks: LR -1A Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 50' ±290' ±295' Wetland 35' 60' 54' Lakeshore 75' 93' Stoop = 67' Existing Hardcover Cabin = 75' Based on the home at 2165 NSD, the structures on the Average Lakeshore subject property must be at least ±170 feet from the lake. The proposed guest cabin will be approximately 95 feet closer to the lake. Section 78-305 - Lot Area/Width: LR -1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 165,138 s.f. (3.76 acre) IRREGULAR Section 78-1403- Structural Coverage: The property exceeds 1.99 acres, therefore structural coverage limits do not apply. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay District Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover in Zone Hardcover Tier 41,284 s.f. 21,587 s.f. 10,944 s.f. 22,546 s.f. 11,005 s.f. Tier 1 165,138 s.f. (25 %) (13.07%) w/in 75' (13.65%) w/in 75' Although the hardcover calculations have not been adjusted to account for the exclusion of all of the retaining walls as is permitted, the property is well below the allowed Tier 1, 25% level. Applicable Regulations: Guest House CUP (Section 78-3031 The existing guest house use on the property is a legal nonconforming use. The proposed reconstruction of the guest house in a new, larger footprint triggers the need for a guest house CUP including the two requested variances for the cabin's proposed location within the 75 -foot and average lakeshore setback. Elevation of a Structure out of the Floodplain on Piers (Section 78-1126) The Code allows for elevation of structures on fill. However elevation using alternate methods requires a CUP and conformance with specific engineering specifications outlined in City Code Section 78-1127(g) which will be applied and verified during the building permit review. AveraRe Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279 The subject property is a peninsula, with 2165 North Shore Drive across the bay as the adjacent property determining the average lakeshore setback. The home at 2165 North Shore is located #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 3 of 7 approximately 170 feet from the OHWL; according to the City Code the guest cabin must be located equal to or further back from the lake than the 2165 North Shore Drive home. The proposed cabin is situated as close as 75 feet to the OHWL (or 67 feet for the stoop). Lake Setback Variance & Hardcover Variance (Sections 78-1279 & 78-1680) The proposed cabin meets the 75 -foot setback from the lake, however the northern stoop access to the cabin is within the setback at 67 feet. Currently 10, 944 square feet or 6.6% of the site's 13% hardcover is within the 75 -foot setback. An additional 61 square feet of hardcover is proposed within the 75 -foot setback, an increase of 0.03%. The applicant is attempting to avoid impacting the existing garden features on the property with the new cabin. The Code prohibits hardcover improvements within 75 feet of the OHWL other than the listed improvements. The stoop is not an approved hardcover allowance. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approvalfor variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed location of the guest cabin does not block lake views of the adjacent property owners, and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. However, the requested lake setback and hardcover variance for the stoop are not consistent with the goals to prohibit structu ra 1/ha rd cover improvements near the lake. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The average lakeshore setback variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. The additional hardcover resulting from the stoop encroachment is relatively minimal. The overall hardcover level of the property is over 10% less than is permitted resulting in sufficient surface water filtration. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The variance requests are residential in nature and are reasonable considering the unique nature of the property as a large peninsula on the lake. The relatively large flood hazard area and existing improvements on the property creates difficulties in locating a conforming structure. #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 4 of 7 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the structures on the property and configuration of the lot were not created by the property owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The visual impacts resulting from the stoop encroachment into the 75 -foot setback, and the cabin's location within the average lakeshore setback will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Rather, the home will not impact views from the lake nor will it appear to be more visually obtrusive than the existing cabin. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a guest cabin/guest house is an allowed conditional use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The Property's location and orientation as a peninsula, functionally an island, is unique. Due to the nature of the Property on the point, the application of the setback requirements causes a practical difficulty. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The Property's location on the lake is unique and applies primarily to this Property; the application of the setback requirements combined with the challenges of the flood hazard area restrict the ability to improve the Property without a variance, creating a practical difficulty. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The guest cabin can be reconstructed in kind. However, the minimal relief from the ordinance allows for functional improvements to the footprint, retaining the character of the lot and are consistent with the existing cabin. Relating to the average lakeshore setback, this condition is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The proposed project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting of the variances will resolve and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty caused by the application of the lake setback and average lakeshore setbacks applied to the Property. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 5 of 7 Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1. Consistent with the community management plan; Relating to both the CUP for elevation on piers, and the guest house, the proposed use is residential in nature and residential use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this neighborhood. 2. Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The guest cabin is in a nonconforming location, however requested variances, if granted would make the proposed improvement compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3. Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; Relating to both the guest house use and the elevation of the guest house on piers, the proposed uses will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. 4. Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Staff believes this criterion is met. 5. Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; Staff believes this criterion is met. 6. Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed guest house elevated on piers is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7. Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The guest house elevated on piers is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. The flood prone nature of the area requires adjustments similar to those proposed. 8. Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the proposed guest house is expected to be residential in character and consistent with that of the principal structure on the Property. 9. Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The use of the guest house elevated on piers is not expected to have any adverse impacts. No information has been presented to indicate such. Construction on piers will be less intrusive than bringing in fill, and will have no impact on the existing flood storage on the property. 10. Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The guest house will be situated similarly to the existing guest cabin on the property and will not be significantly visible when viewed from off the Property on the street side, and the views from the lake will be primarily from the bay. In the opinion of staff, additional screening or buffering will not be required. #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 6 of 7 11. Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The proposed guest house elevated on piers is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. 12. Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; It is anticipated that the proposed guest house elevated on piers will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13. Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed guest house on piers has been designed to conform to the historic architecture of the existing structures on the property, and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; Applicants are hereby advised of this requirement; and 15. Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. Staff believes this criterion is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer; two SAC fees were collected in 2000 for the sewer connection. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties and Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds that the peninsula configuration of the property functions much like an island yet shares a 6 foot connection with the property across the bay at 2165 North Shore Drive dictating the average lakeshore setback requirement. The subject property does not blockviews of the lake from the home at 2165 NSD as it is across the water from the home. Staff finds this satisfies the practical difficulty requirement for the average lakeshore setback. The applicant has opted to modify the footprint and location of the guest cabin thereby triggering the need for the variances as well as the CUP. Staff finds that the stoop on the north side of the home can be removed as there are three other points of egress on the cabin. The proposed development suggests hardcover levels beneath the Tier 1 allowance; there is sufficient pervious area offering infiltration opportunities on the property. The conditions applying to the two different conditional use permits relating to the guest cabin have been satisfied according to staff. The engineering standards applied to the CUP for the structure to be elevated out of the floodplain via the helical piers will be reviewed and applied at the building permit stage. #17-3904 21 Feb 2017 Page 7 of 7 Engineer Comments The MCWD will be reviewing the project from a floodplain impact standpoint. The Building Official will assure that the engineering specifications required within the floodplain regulations are met as part of the building permit review. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends as follows: 1. Approval of the guest house CUP with the standard covenants; 2. Approval of the CUP to permit the guest house to be constructed on helical piers within the floodplain; and 3. Approval of the average setback variance for the construction of the new guest house cabin. Additionally, if the planning commission finds practical difficulties relating to the floodplain, topography, and layout of the property exist; that the property offers sufficient surface water infiltration opportunities; and that the stoop within the 75 -foot setback will not create a visual obstruction, approval of the setback and hardcover variances maybe appropriate. Iftheplanning commission does not find practical difficulties supporting the stoop location, a denial recommendation would be appropriate. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Applications Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Conditions Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. City Code Sections Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit /. Site Photos — from Applicant Exhibit J. SAC Payments Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map City of Orono Variance Application StreetAddress: 2750 Kelley Application # /7 - Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Date Received Main: 952-249-4600 staff fax: 952-249-4616 Fee '70-C MailingAddiess: Escrow# & $ P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee Notes Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: 20'10 5HOP-151-1t4ra P&Iye . &KaN c c5 i; S-1 I DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: &MMAWLE F-AbM rtie AVEMern LAKFESKOXE -sb-TI5bc, (attached additional sheets aVecessary) SU -4 b — 12 -f I c L'A IYEEATTA614 P mrr-LILPAIM I I A"r-N I lNrUKMA I ION: Applicant Name: L-AtAgEL. VliA-AKr-> AF -GV Phone (Primary): 612.2 - 313 - 91L — Applicant Email: 1AMy-e—Je* 1"M1 tAll . C-0 Address: 0+19 L�10CAW AVB. -4. Applicant is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email: T e C-1 ty-&� — A PZH I Trze, 13 check here if property owner is same as applicant 01 APPLICANTIAGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no altemative but to reject It until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantlowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant/Agent Signature: Applicant/Agent Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Vadance Application — May 2016 -,MAP Page 2 /-16- 2,011 Date: - RECEIVED JAN 18 2017 # 3904 CITY OF ORONO City o Orono Conditional Use Permit Application StreetAddress. Application # 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Date Received staff Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Fee Mailing Address: Escrow # & $ P.0- Box 66 Crysial Bay, MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee Notes Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: �U,10 SHOF-Ekitit t�FIVE- 00,C) N 1) . A u !;SS APPLICANT I AGENT INFORMATION: Applicant Name: LAVILS-1, V 1041AIJO 6ILC+"lr MGT U Phone (Primary) U111. 11-+ - S116 . — Applicant Email: AAA M I Q 1AAAlre- I tA I I &MA - LOVA Address: _111b LZAat,L AVE 5 City: h&? L's, ZIP: 9 5!f Agent Name: Agent's phone number Agent Email: Applicant is: Contractor, Homeowner _�tILIC,tJ T.5 e -T PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: --MAILTViA MTMIP-S "L-A 2 Phone(Primary): __Ukl .1-10 ir le One) Mailing Address: I td I 1A W. VL ti 0 %T City: M F" ZIP: C;5$05 Email.- �AeAA V" 14tr!% & AV I - Lb v-,A- �J APPLICANTIAGENT AND/OR OWNER: 0 Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon bilure to do so, the staff has no allArriative but to reject It until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. * Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • 04er and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicanVowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant/Agent Signature: —Date: 4 17� Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Property Owner 5�fgnature-�-MAA Petl YA - f f --F 18 T_ Property Owner Signature: Date: CUP Application - January 2016 RECEIVED Page 2 JAN 18 2017 C TY OF ORONO # 3905 Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e M 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Conditional Use Permit Application Project Narrative January 18, 2017 Property Address: 2090 Shoreline Drive, Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Area: 3.79 Acres, or 165,138.1 S.F. (See attached EFN certified property survey) Property Owner: Martha Meyers Head, Trustee Property Type: Seasonal Residential Recreational, Non -Homestead Tier Assignment: Tier 1 Project Narrative. The property owner seeks a Conditional Use Permit to at[ow for the replacement of an existing structure, noted as "cabin" on the certified property survey, on property located at 2090 Shoreline Drive in the City of Orono. Based on City Code Section 78-1127(g), the property owner proposes to use an alternate method to elevate the new structure above the established floodplain or contour tine 931.5, as noted on the property survey. Sec 78-1127(g) states that "a[ternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation (932.5)." Based on the recommendation of the soils report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services, issued April 29, 2016, and attached to this application, the owner proposes to use helical piers to support the new structure. Two soil borings were completed on the property in the area of the existing cabin. The report indicates that "the topsoil, existing fill, organic silt and very loose sands are compressible and not suitable for foundation support". Further, "soil corrections to remove the compressible soils will require excavations extending to a depth of approx. 19 to 24 feet and will require extensive dewatering". The proposed helical anchor system will extend through the compressible soils and bear on the underlying native dense sands and lean clays to support the main floor beam structure. The proposed new structure will replace an existing cabin and will be used by the family as a seasonal residence. The existing cabin is one of two summer residences located on the property and used by the family since 1925. No basement or crawl space wit[ be constructed below the main level of the new structure. The helical pier support system will be used to support 16" floor trusses at the main and upper levels of the residence. Minimal excavation or soil disturbance will be required. In consultation with structural engineer, Eric Bunkers, of Bunkers and Associates, the preliminary helical pier plan proposes the installation of approx. 50 helical piers to be used to support the structural beams and floor trusses. (See attached preliminary schematic plans, elevations and building section prepared by Laurel Ulland Architecture.) The footprint of the proposed new structure is approx. 2643.25 S.F. The 1and disturbing" activity related to the installation of the helical piers will be substantially less than 5000 square feet and will not involve grading, excavating, filling or the storage of soils on the site. Helical piers are "threaded" into the soil using a small bobcat. Existing and final grades will not change. Laurel UJand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Conditional Use Permit Application Project Narrative January 18, 2017 The impervious surface or hardcover on the property will increase minimally with the construction of the new cabin. An additional 873 S.F will be added to the footprint of the new structure, over and above the footprint of the original cabin. This will increase the impervious surface on the property by approx. 0.58%, or less than 1% of the total hardcover. The existing hardcover on the property totals approx. 13.07% of the 3.79 -acre property. It wilt increase to 13.65% of the total property, if the new cabin is constructed. The proposed new cabin, along with the existing principal structure, noted as the "2 -story wood frame house" on the property survey, constitute approx. 3% of the hardcover on the property. The floodplain area of the parcel is significant. Except for the raised area and hillside located at the west end of the property, where the principal structure is sited, the majority of the property is below the 931.5 contour line, the 100 -year flood elevation. There are no alternate locations for the replacement of the existing cabin, without constructing within the established floodplain. The existing grade elevations on the property are under stress by higher lake levels, managed by entities outside the control of the property owner. The property has been held by the same family for over 100 years. The current heir proposes to continue to use the property as a seasonal family residence. The existing cabin is no longer suitable or habitable for the children and grandchildren of the property owner. The owner seeks to replace the cabin with a new structure basically in the same location as the current structure. The southern perimeter or edge of the new structure will remain the same. The new structure will shift approx. 15' to the west. This wilt allow the established landscape and gardens on the property to remain in place and it wilt allow the new structure to be located well beyond the 35' setback or buffer associated with the delineated wetland. (See the proposed property survey for reference.) The elevation of the new structure has been designed to set the top of the main level subfloor at the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's "low opening minimum" of 933.5. This will allow for all service utilities, including ductwork, to be elevated above The City of Orono regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE) of 932.5, as outlined in City Code Sec 78-1125 (e). The schematic plans include two mechanical rooms located on the main level of the residence. The mechanical rooms will allow for the installation of all HVAC equipment, as well as electrical, AV/data, and plumbing equipment, to be located above the RFPE. The main level and upper level floor plates will be structured with 16" floor trusses to allow for the installation of ductwork, as well as electrical and plumbing lines, within the floor plates. Additional mechanical equipment will be located in the attic space above the upper level of the proposed structure. All exterior skirting or base materials at the perimeter of the house will be designed to prevent flood waters from accumulating below the main level floor structure. A preliminary review of the proposed project by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District indicates that issues related to erosion control, wettand protection and floodplain alteration will have to be addressed. A Water Resource Permit Application Form has been submitted to MCWD and a joint meeting between the City of Orono and MCWD has been scheduled to ensure compliance with all permit requirements. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Conditional Use Permit Application Project Narrative January 18, 2017 The existing grade will not be altered by the proposed construction, nor wilt the soils be disturbed by excavating, fitting or storing of soils. The impact of the helical pier installation wit( be minimal. Wetland delineation has been completed by Anderson Engineering in conjunction with the preparation and certification of the property survey by Egan, Field & Nowak (EFN) in August 2016. The new structure has been located to avoid any encroachment of the 35' wettand buffer zone identified on the proposed property survey, dated January 9, 2017. The proposed increase to the impervious surface on the property is well below that allowed for a parcel of this size. (See existing and proposed hardcover calculations prepared by Laurel Ulland Architecture and Egan, Field & Nowak.) The property owner, building contractor, architect and consulting engineers are committed to best management practices in order to eliminate or mitigate any negative impact that the proposed construction may have on the property, and will work with the City of Orono and the MCWD to review all pertinent rules and regulations. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e M 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 Property Address: 2090 Shoreline Drive, Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Area: 3.79 Acres, or 165,138,1 S.F. (See attached EFN certified property survey) Property Owner: Martha M Head, Trustee Property Type: Seasonal Residential Recreational, Non -Homestead Zoning Classification: LR -1A Tier Assignment: Tier 1 "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." The property owner proposes to use the property in the manner it has been used for nearly 100 years, as a seasonal recreational residence. The property is currently zoned LR -1A, One -Family Lakeshore Residential. The Head family has used the property as a summer home since the original structures were constructed in 1925. There are two existing dwellings on the 3.79 -acre property, a "2 -story wood frame house" and a "cabin" (as noted on the property survey) as well as two small accessory structures. The existing structures pre -date the current zoning ordinances defining lakeshore setbacks. No improvements are proposed for the 2 -story main structure or for the existing accessory structures at this time. The property owner proposes to replace the existing cabin, however, with a new residential structure to be located in a similar manner. The existing cabin is an accretion of several old and poorly constructed out -buildings and is no longer suitable for the family's use. The location of the existing cabin, and of the proposed new structure, is non -conforming with respect to the current zoning ordinance defining the average takeshore setback. The property owner seeks a variance from the average lakeshore setback as defined in Section 78-1279 (6a) for a new structure with a different footprint and massing from the original cabin. As Section 78-1279 (6a) notes: "In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant tot or right of way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most takeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot." Based on Hennepin County aerial property maps, the adjacent lakeshore property is located at 2165 North Shore Drive, to the north and several hundred feet around the bay from the 2090 Shoreline Drive parcel. The residence on the adjacent property is not visible from the residences located at 2090 Shoreline Drive. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e 0- 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 The existing residence at 2165 North Shore Drive is located approx. 143 feet from the [akeshore. The existing cabin at 2090 Shoreline Drive is located approx. 93 feet from the takeshore. The new structure is proposed to be located approx. 75' from the takeshore. The property owner proposes to locate the new structure somewhat closer to the takeshore to accommodate extensive and existing gardens on the property. The new structure will also be located somewhat to the west of the existing cabin to avoid the 35' delineated wettand setback. The southern edge of the new structure will remain in the same location as the southern edge of the original cabin. To locate the new structure equivalent to the adjacent property setback of 143 feet wiH cause great harm to the existing landscape and gardens on the property. It wit[ also create a conflict with the existing 35' setback from the delineated wettand. The proposed location for the new structure maintains sufficient distance from the 35' delineated wetland setback and avoids the wetland buffer. See attached certified property survey for the location of the proposed new dwelling relative to the wetland buffer. The proposed new cabin will be larger than the existing cabin in order to accommodate mechanical rooms set above the required City of Orono Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 932.5 and MCWD low opening requirement of 933.5. The new structure will be constructed without a basement or crawl space. It will be supported by helical piers in order to protect existing grade elevations, avoid excavation of existing soils and reach soils suitable for foundation support. Refer to the Conditional Use Permit application for additional information and to the soil report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services and dated April 29, 2016. The footprint of the new structure will be 873 sq. ft. larger than the footprint of the existing cabin. The hardcover on the property will increase from 13.07 % to 13.65%, well below the maximum allowable. The footprints of the existing 2 -story principal structure and the proposed new structure account for approx. 3% of the hardcover on the property. The footprint of the new cabin, along with that of the existing accessory structures (gazebo and pump house), totals 3051.7 sq. ft., below the 3200 -sq. ft. allowable for accessory structures on a property of this size. 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to her property and not created by the landowner." The property at 2090 Shoreline Drive is one of the most unique properties on Lake Minnetonka. It comprises nearly 4 acres of land on a peninsula or point of land on the north and west side of the Arcola Bridge, a bridge connecting Crystal Bay with Minnetonka Beach. It is accessed by a gravel drive that travels under the existing SOO Line railroad trestle. It is isolated from adjacent properties. There are no immediate neighbors or adjacent structures in the traditional or "typical" sense. The average lakeshore setback is determined by a distant residence to the north that is not visible from the property. The unique characteristics of the property create a "practical difficulty" not of the property owner's making. The property owner seeks to replace an existing cabin that is no longer habitable with a new cabin, similar in character to the original cabin and to the existing 2 -story main house on the property. The proposed new cabin is subject to zoning regulations not in place when the original cabin was constructed. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 The property is also unique in that it is only used as a summer residence, from May to October each year, not as a year-round residence. The property has been held by the same family for 100 years. It wilt continue to be used by the family as a seasonal residence, one of the few properties that maintains this historic use. The current zoning ordinances have come into play since the family started using the property. The original structures are still on the property and maintained in their original condition and location. In order to improve or replace original structures, the property owner is now subject to regulations that require city review. These regulations were not known at the time the family acquired the property. The existing grade elevations on the property have always constituted a "practical difficulty" but have not been changed over the course of the current landowner's tenure. The landowner does not propose to change the existing grade elevations with the construction of a new cabin. Much of the 3.79 -acre property has a grade elevation below the regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE) established by the City of Orono. The main house is set on a hillside on the west side of the property and is located above the 100 -year flood elevation of 931.5. The existing cabin, however, is located within the floodplain. It is not located within the delineated wetland nor within the wetland buffer located on the north side of the property, but it has been impacted by rising water levels, a result of water level control measures taken by various Lake Minnetonka governing bodies and outside of the control of the property owner. The property owner seeks to use best practices methods to protect the existing grade "as is" and to follow the recommendations set forth in the soils report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services when constructing the new structure. 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The granting of a variance to the average lakeshore setback to allow for a new cabin to replace an existing cabin will not change the essential character of the property or locality. The design goat for the new structure is to match the original style of the main house and the existing cabin that it wilt replace. Both structures were constructed around 1925. Minor changes have been made to the structures over the years but the seasonal nature of the cabins has remained. A gambrel roof structure wilt be used to match the original cabin. Shingles, siding, windows and exterior materials wilt be similar in quality, size and color. The new structure wilt be upgraded to include a year-round HVAC system, although the family does not anticipate using the cabin during the winter months. The character of this specific property will not be altered by the proposed changes. It is virtually invisible from other properties in the immediate locate, except if viewed from the water. The property list obtained from Hennepin County lists five adjacent properties, only two of which have residences on them. Neither of the two residences are visible from the existing or proposed structures located on 2090 Shoreline Drive. The property is essentially a throwback to an earlier time when Lake Minnetonka was used by seasonal residents, not full-time residents. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e M 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." Economic considerations are not a part of this application and pose no practical difficulty to the continued use of the property by the current property owner. Reasonable use of the property will continue into the future with the next generation of the family that owns the property. The new cabin will be used by the children and grandchildren of the current owner. It will be a more up-to- date version of the existing cabin, with amenities to match the main house, but the use of the property will not change. The existence of two cabins on the property might be considered "non -conforming", according to the current zoning ordinances related to the LR -1A classification, in the sense that both dwellings have been used by siblings of the original owners and are equal in that regard. With the death of the original family members, one might consider the existing "2 -story wood frame house" as the principal residence, and the smaller "cabin" as a guest house or accessory structure but they were historically used by two separate but related families. The proposed new cabin wit[ be used by the offspring of the remaining family owner and heir. It will not be used as a rentable unit. The new structure is meant to replace, not increase, the number of residences or accessory structures on the property. The size of the property is approx. two times the size of the minimally required property for the current zoning classification. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." N/A. Not applicable. 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's [and is located." The property will continue to be used as a one -family residential property, for seasonal recreation. The zoning classification is LR -1A. The proposed changes to the property do not seek to atter this classification or impact other properties located in the same zone. The property owner seeks to replace an existing cabin with a new cabin, with a slightly larger footprint, in essentially the same location on the property. It will be used in the same way that the original structure has been used, by family members for the summer months of each year. The total square footage of the footprint of the new structure, along with the square footage of the two existing accessory structures, does not exceed the maximum at[owabte for a property of this size. The total hardcover on the property will be increased by approx. 0.58% or about 1/2 percent. This constitutes a negligible impact on the property. A separate Conditional Use Permit will be sought Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 to allow the construction of the new structure using alternate methods of construction to ensure that the existing ftoodptain, grade elevations and soils remain undisturbed during and after construction. 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-famity dwelling." N/A. Not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The special conditions that characterize both the existing structures and the property located at 2090 Shoreline Drive are peculiar and unique even to the varied and irregular properties that are located around Lake Minnetonka and in the surrounding neighborhoods and districts. This property is nearly invisible from adjacent properties. It comprises 3.79 acres on a peninsula that is accessed from a gravel road under a railroad trestle. The old SOO rail line separates the property from all other adjoining properties. A major bridge, the Arcola Bridge, is located to the south of the property, separating the property from Minnetonka Beach. The closest residence is located to the north of the property, several hundred feet as the crow flies over a small bay adjoining Crystal Bay. Because of the isolation of the property from adjoining properties, it is difficult to apply standard zoning regulations or even rules governing average lakeshore setbacks. A variance to the average lakeshore setback is sought by the property owner because of the difficulty of applying the same lakeshore setback that exists at the nearest adjacent residence to this unique parcel. The owner hopes to replace an already extant structure with a new structure, in the same location. A "practical difficulty" will arise if the new cabin cannot be constructed at the location of the existing cabin. The original structures on the property are peculiar to the immediately adjoining properties and predate current zoning ordinances and setbacks. The original 1925 "2 -story wood frame house" is located at the highest elevation on the property approx. 48.9 ft. from the west shoreline and occupies the entire hillside above the 931.5 contour line. The existing "cabin" is located approx. 93 feet from the north shoreline, within the currently defined floodplain. Both buildings are used as summer homes by a single family, not as year-round residences. A typical setback for this zoning classification is 75' from the shoreline or it is defined by the average distance from the shoreline of existing residences on either side of the property. Because no residences adjoin the property on either side, the average lakeshore setback is governed by a property located to the north that is adjacent but not comparable. The adjacent property has a setback of 143 ft. from the lakeshore. We propose to set the new cabin 75' from the north shoreline, maintaining the southern edge of the structure but moving the new structure westward to avoid the wettand buffer. Laurel Wand Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p laurei@lauretuttand.com I e M 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 The grade elevations for a significant portion of the property are generally lower than the established 100 -year high water line of 931.5. The existing cabin is located in a floodplain below this elevation at the 930.5 contour line. There is no other area on the property that the proposed new structure can be located that will not be below the 931.5 contour line. This constitutes a peculiar and special condition, unique to this property. The property has been owned by the same family for approx. 100 years. The current owner hopes to maintain the property as it has been used over the course of its history and allow the next generation of the family to continue to use the property in the summer months, for years to come. The owner is willing to apply for a variance to the average lakeshore setback and to apply for a conditional use permit in order to replace the existing cabin according to current zoning rules and regulations. All means and methods will be used to construct the replacement structure to meet current requirements. The new structure will not require excavation or a change to the existing grade elevations. It will be supported by helical piers, with no basement or crawl space. All utilities and services will be located above the City of Orono's RFPE. The main level subfloor of the new structure will be set at 933.5, the MCWD's low opening minimum requirement. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." As outlined above, the property and structures at 2090 Shoreline Drive are unique and peculiar. Even though there are many varied and irregular properties located around the shores of Lake Minnetonka, it would be hard to name other parcels or structures that are characterized by similar conditions. This large parcel of land is still used as a summer only residence and is virtually invisible from adjacent properties and neighborhoods. The existing and proposed hardcover on the property comprises approx. 13% of the parcel. The two residential structures constitute only about 3% of the hardcover on the property. The owner has a desire to maintain and improve the property in a way that supports the original use of the property, for future generations of the family. The property has been stressed by rising water levels. Yet, the owner is committed to saving the property and enhancing the historic use of the property. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of Q substantial property right of the applicant." The granting of a variance from the average lakeshore setback, as outlined in Sec 78-1279 (6a), will allow the property owner to preserve the existing character of the property. The proposed new cabin will replace a substandard cabin with a residence that the owner's children and grandchildren can use for many years to come. The new structure will blend in with the existing structures, using many of the same exterior materials and details. To be able to locate the new cabin in the same place on the property as the existing cabin will allow the preservation of the existing topography, cause little disruption to the existing floodp[ain and wit[ not impact the delineated wetland along the north shore of the property. The property itself and the structures located on the property will remain nearly invisible from the adjacent properties. Hopefully, the property will continue to be enjoyed for another 100 years by the owner's heirs. -L A Laurel Ulland Architecture 1718 Logan Avenue South Minneapolis, PIN 55403 612 874 1086 1 p louret@taurelulland.com I e 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 Variance Application Practical Difficulties Form January 18, 2017 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." The proposed changes to the property will not impair health, safety, comfort, morals or be contrary to the intent of the current zoning ordinances. Means and methods of construction will be specified to protect the existing property and maintain its current condition. Best practices will be used to ensure that soils are not disturbed, that the floodplain is not impacted by the work, and that all means to protect the delineated wetland and shoreline will be used. 12. "The granting of such variance wilt not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The granting of the variance from the average lakeshore setback does not constitute a convenience for the property owner. A significant portion of the property is impacted by the practical difficulties described above. The ability to replace a failing, existing structure on the property will be aided by the granting of a variance to allow for the construction of a new structure in the same location. By constructing the new structure in the same location, the impact of the construction will be minimal and the remainder of the property can be maintained in its current condition. 0 '�M3 ------ N89'59'59"W 45847 DO NO HENNEPIN COUNTY CASTIRON MONUMENT TOWNSHIP 117 H RANGE 23 W NORTH LINE OF SECPON 15, (MEANDER CORNER 63) ,--ED E OF DEUNEA TED WEILAND 1V"72-52'jq,,W SUN,, _INC 6 ZE ,-931.5 CONTOUR I E, 021 LAKE MINNETONKA I "-POINTOF i?� I BEGINNING SHORE LINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA 4- 1 NUNCIO --WOOD FIELD LOCATED AUGUST 18TH, 2016-' WTA STAIRS -\E K, ETAIIINC --R I ELTAINING FFE._ r WA L �/ - , ` I / FEE __'Z - " L ERI -4 "1 .11,111, " N� 9,528 179 7,1 7' > I F LANDSCAPING N87V4'2j-W --STONE PATH 9] 8 I&II If '5 '-STOME A, PA VERS SOD -STONE PATH RETAINING IF WALL ORD7 I 0 931.5 CONTOUR--� 14' WESTERLY NIGHT OF WA I IF WALL r C�SALL NO, 75 IT S s R� 4ff - A gp f / LA RINI B ICY BODE 7 'k y -4 Is- SOD A "II AREA CONTOUR 1 r -2 F, B. E, - Ag/ .4 _Y\_9 ER RA, " -U& 11, `� A A 31.5 C' _'\ , R C -02 ARI - ----- EDGE OF DEL INEA �TED --_WEDAND . 4!j 319. 85 01- T`WEI 119 PA IH 41 LAKE MINNETONKA CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MARTHA HEAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Thot I It If 01,11 -It Lot 1, SlIbb, 15, T -ship 117, Ro.g,, 23, Id of th. b-sti.h. ih ..id S.oti.b 15. d'_'ib,d - f.I C.-T-bg ot M-bdor C ... K, No 63 1-tRd h tho -th Iiho If s.id S.tt,Ih 15; th.- No,th 89 �q,000 59 ,it� 59 hd� Wst --d ho -mg I.bg s.id -th I-, I di�tbo bf 458.47 fo,A to th, -sto,ly ,ight-,f-w,y ims of th, St P-1, III .... p,li, P,d M,,it,b, G t N,,ths,,) R,11,,y; th-, S-th 17 dq.... 07 ,i,bt,, 41 D, ... B, W�L .1,,g .id t,rly right -f ,y I i'T I ItI, IT If 11A2.bl fT1 to th, p,i,t bf b"i,,i,g L I., to dl W_ I , " " " d ... ibod; III- N.Ith 72 t,g- 19 s -d, I st-I f 6 f-1, ".. 1. thR h- ji's .1 Lo'II M_Ionll; th,11t, '*�,.IIIFA 111thIlly, ,,th,,Iy bd ... ts,ly, Iobg -id h,,, III, to ;.iht - ,id _E'by 'i,h t_,f_., , "o d It_ t, -o , I-, .-th-toby BIT, WI p.nt bf ho, -mg; 11,... N-11 17 1 ...... s 11 II[b.tos 41 -.Ids F -t. d o, 9 bb, _61� Ight-.f-..y disto- of 360 f -F ,.Is o' III- to th. '.I't If I sgbgj�g' T.g,,thb, with . --l-i- bpp-t-t -so-t f., mg -ss ..d IgIoss � th.t p.,t f -d A ..... -1 L.t 1 d ... ib,d - follows ""' I It ' p-i't .' -d -to,ly ,ght-.f-..y 162&91 f,Wt ... th f- tho .,tb - If -id SILttis, 15, As sd tI.rg so w1otIlly li'ht-If-Ily bl, th-1 So,th 72 B�g. 52 hr -t.. 19 -Id. th_b I 'do E.tt I distbh bf 50 00 f.Tt; Nb,t 62 do,,o,, 07 41 .... Ebot I di,to of 35.36 fost; 11, ... I N 1h 17 log- 07 -.6,, 41 _I_ dK, E.st I di st_ o f 178 . f_,: thob - S.Ith 72 dog's. 52 IT inu I_ '� _.' ds lost I d.,t,n,, of 25,00 f,,t to th, ,st,,Iy ight-,f-,,y fir, of th, St P-1, Minn-O,1H, hd M -nitbb. (G,I. t N.,flI R.i4b,, th-o &-th 17 dog-, 07 i,btI, 41 --do Wobt, .1-g s.id Th,t,Ily ,,gh -.f-,.y I-, I -t.... If 203,60 fTIt; NIKIII S.,th 62 db,- 07 , 41 .,,,do W -t b h,st-I of 35,36 `-t' th- N.,th 72 dRg-s 52 t,s. 19 -bbds W.t . dfiot ... s of 75.00 fisst to too w-t.,Iy Hight _'f_"y in '; th-, N.Ith 17 d,g 07 �it 41 IdI E.st, .1..g dd st�,Iy ight-f-y i di.to-, If 21�00 f"t to th, p,,nt of �m , in , ., ,t foIth n CR Do,, No 8518737� NOTES: 1 Th, -t, 1 11 11 thi:.b-lih, HytF, i I ... A! N, th, -th lin, of S,.ti,, 15, Township 117 R.bgs 23 hi�h I, .ss'_d I. h.o I b ,no If -th 89 d,,gI... 59 59 -ds W,st 2 Tho .,,, of th, p,,p,,ty to th, Mh... [I,, of L.k, Mi ... t,,k. I, 2y79 I .... . .. loss 3 No ti I, w,,k ,, f.,,I,h,d f,I th, p,,p ... tj of this y Is -ify th, sq,I J-1pti-, b, th, of .hy --t, or b-1 ...... I ff,,tin, 11, ,,p,,t,, 4 E�i'tjbg 'tiliti" It ... ", -d nd,,g .... d h.wn Is.... w- 1.Itt�d b..sd bp.n b ... �.d ;d.- Vo,if-ti- .,d 1 -ti- of .11 tiliti. nd rb- sh-ld bo bbt.mAd f- tho ow -A f III, -poot- �tiit p6m, I. hy -ig,-, pI .... g I s- ... Lion. tY BENCHMARK W.tA, I ... tibb po, th, C,ty bf 0.... w,b,,t, b, Abg.,t 17th, 2016 = 929.46 f,,t 6 Wtl,,d b,im-tt- w,, p,,f,,,,d by And,,,,n Engin-mg of Mmn ... to LLC - A,g,,t 10th, 2016, HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 1� B� Id,,,g, �bbbbbs. g -g- h,d,, g ... b,, boot ho,w) A,461�6 EF 2, G,-1 III[- = Ci I Cnoh,/,tS UIpI.- .Ik,, p.flh�, dging) 1,670.6 BY, 4 D�'s m 5 R,t,i,ihg Its (i�id, 75 f..t �h skbk) 400�4 S.F 6 Rot-ing -11, (,,tsid, 75 f,,t h,,, ,tb,,k) - s" T III H -c-, - 22,425 4 S.F TItII Lot All, It, - k '.i.t bg H.,ds.'s' '__ Los. 0.147 0 ix 2X 3x LUC GUY ANCHOR SIGN /G --OVERHEAD WIRES BITUMINOUS SURFACE SCALE IN FEET 2 GAS METER CONCRETE SURFACE FILE NO. xxxx LJN GRAVEL SURFACE FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT Land surveyors since 1872 FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK loll jah/ 11 m� 50 LEGEND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MARTHA HEAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Thot I It If 01,11 -It Lot 1, SlIbb, 15, T -ship 117, Ro.g,, 23, Id of th. b-sti.h. ih ..id S.oti.b 15. d'_'ib,d - f.I C.-T-bg ot M-bdor C ... K, No 63 1-tRd h tho -th Iiho If s.id S.tt,Ih 15; th.- No,th 89 �q,000 59 ,it� 59 hd� Wst --d ho -mg I.bg s.id -th I-, I di�tbo bf 458.47 fo,A to th, -sto,ly ,ight-,f-w,y ims of th, St P-1, III .... p,li, P,d M,,it,b, G t N,,ths,,) R,11,,y; th-, S-th 17 dq.... 07 ,i,bt,, 41 D, ... B, W�L .1,,g .id t,rly right -f ,y I i'T I ItI, IT If 11A2.bl fT1 to th, p,i,t bf b"i,,i,g L I., to dl W_ I , " " " d ... ibod; III- N.Ith 72 t,g- 19 s -d, I st-I f 6 f-1, ".. 1. thR h- ji's .1 Lo'II M_Ionll; th,11t, '*�,.IIIFA 111thIlly, ,,th,,Iy bd ... ts,ly, Iobg -id h,,, III, to ;.iht - ,id _E'by 'i,h t_,f_., , "o d It_ t, -o , I-, .-th-toby BIT, WI p.nt bf ho, -mg; 11,... N-11 17 1 ...... s 11 II[b.tos 41 -.Ids F -t. d o, 9 bb, _61� Ight-.f-..y disto- of 360 f -F ,.Is o' III- to th. '.I't If I sgbgj�g' T.g,,thb, with . --l-i- bpp-t-t -so-t f., mg -ss ..d IgIoss � th.t p.,t f -d A ..... -1 L.t 1 d ... ib,d - follows ""' I It ' p-i't .' -d -to,ly ,ght-.f-..y 162&91 f,Wt ... th f- tho .,tb - If -id SILttis, 15, As sd tI.rg so w1otIlly li'ht-If-Ily bl, th-1 So,th 72 B�g. 52 hr -t.. 19 -Id. th_b I 'do E.tt I distbh bf 50 00 f.Tt; Nb,t 62 do,,o,, 07 41 .... Ebot I di,to of 35.36 fost; 11, ... I N 1h 17 log- 07 -.6,, 41 _I_ dK, E.st I di st_ o f 178 . f_,: thob - S.Ith 72 dog's. 52 IT inu I_ '� _.' ds lost I d.,t,n,, of 25,00 f,,t to th, ,st,,Iy ight-,f-,,y fir, of th, St P-1, Minn-O,1H, hd M -nitbb. (G,I. t N.,flI R.i4b,, th-o &-th 17 dog-, 07 i,btI, 41 --do Wobt, .1-g s.id Th,t,Ily ,,gh -.f-,.y I-, I -t.... If 203,60 fTIt; NIKIII S.,th 62 db,- 07 , 41 .,,,do W -t b h,st-I of 35,36 `-t' th- N.,th 72 dRg-s 52 t,s. 19 -bbds W.t . dfiot ... s of 75.00 fisst to too w-t.,Iy Hight _'f_"y in '; th-, N.Ith 17 d,g 07 �it 41 IdI E.st, .1..g dd st�,Iy ight-f-y i di.to-, If 21�00 f"t to th, p,,nt of �m , in , ., ,t foIth n CR Do,, No 8518737� NOTES: 1 Th, -t, 1 11 11 thi:.b-lih, HytF, i I ... A! N, th, -th lin, of S,.ti,, 15, Township 117 R.bgs 23 hi�h I, .ss'_d I. h.o I b ,no If -th 89 d,,gI... 59 59 -ds W,st 2 Tho .,,, of th, p,,p,,ty to th, Mh... [I,, of L.k, Mi ... t,,k. I, 2y79 I .... . .. loss 3 No ti I, w,,k ,, f.,,I,h,d f,I th, p,,p ... tj of this y Is -ify th, sq,I J-1pti-, b, th, of .hy --t, or b-1 ...... I ff,,tin, 11, ,,p,,t,, 4 E�i'tjbg 'tiliti" It ... ", -d nd,,g .... d h.wn Is.... w- 1.Itt�d b..sd bp.n b ... �.d ;d.- Vo,if-ti- .,d 1 -ti- of .11 tiliti. nd rb- sh-ld bo bbt.mAd f- tho ow -A f III, -poot- �tiit p6m, I. hy -ig,-, pI .... g I s- ... Lion. tY BENCHMARK W.tA, I ... tibb po, th, C,ty bf 0.... w,b,,t, b, Abg.,t 17th, 2016 = 929.46 f,,t 6 Wtl,,d b,im-tt- w,, p,,f,,,,d by And,,,,n Engin-mg of Mmn ... to LLC - A,g,,t 10th, 2016, HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 1� B� Id,,,g, �bbbbbs. g -g- h,d,, g ... b,, boot ho,w) A,461�6 EF 2, G,-1 III[- = 15,411,5 S,E I Cnoh,/,tS UIpI.- .Ik,, p.flh�, dging) 1,670.6 BY, 4 D�'s 3711 SY, 5 R,t,i,ihg Its (i�id, 75 f..t �h skbk) 400�4 S.F 6 Rot-ing -11, (,,tsid, 75 f,,t h,,, ,tb,,k) - 1 092 S�F, T III H -c-, - 22,425 4 S.F TItII Lot All, It, - 165jS8 1 SF '.i.t bg H.,ds.'s' '__ Los. 0.147 CERTIFICATION: h -by -fify th.t this -by, pl.n, ., r�pbrt - p,b",bd by - or -d- bby di -t -d th.t I B�I y J --d L -d S-oy., -d,,, th,, - of tHo St.to of M-ossto. D.t f A t 18 2D1 6 Dot 3, 20)11, Mi,,..t. U ,o No 22033 rILLLJbUUK I VAU� 0 MANHOLE ---k- FENCE SURVEYFOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: -4�- LIGHT //////-BLJILDING LINE CHIE : Sw DRAWN BY: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Martha Head POWER POLE WITH LIGHT Ill COMMUNICATION BOX NO. DATE DESCRIPTION Q UTILITY POLE Ell AIR CONDITIONER 0 ix 2X 3x LUC GUY ANCHOR SIGN JOB NO. xxxxx --OVERHEAD WIRES BITUMINOUS SURFACE SCALE IN FEET 2 GAS METER CONCRETE SURFACE FILE NO. xxxx LJN GRAVEL SURFACE FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT Land surveyors since 1872 FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK rILLLJbUUK I VAU� rILLLhWUKK REVISIONS SURVEYFOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2791 59 CHIE : Sw DRAWN BY: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Martha Head 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 P410NE: (612) 466-3300 I Ag E FN FAX: (612) 466-3383 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM Egan. Field & Nowak, Inc. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWING NAME: 36852 C3D.dwg LUC JOB NO. xxxxx BY: ,,Yp,,HT. 2016 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWIIN, INC, FILE NO. xxxx LJN Land surveyors since 1872 ------ N89'59'59"W 45847 DO AD HENNEPIN COUNTY CASTIRON MONUMENT TOWNSHIP 117 H RANGE 23 W NORTH LINE OF SECPON 15, N (MEANDER CORNER 63) B/ 7- 9 ----- EDGE OF NEVADA TED ILAND G /V,72 '52' --- \1ROl S74 SU Vcy HOE STEPSILANDIN FOOT WETHID BUFFER - -------- 35 FOOT WET4 19"w (Typ.) 6 -931.5 CONTOUR ZE 'I, LAKE MINNETONKA —POINT OF i? BEGINNING SHORE LINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA SOO FIELD LOCATED AUGUST 18TH, 2016--, C- -\E qRETAWINC ;q�,A —, WALL GU T -- ------ F`CSTWO CA A H Is 4 T, -RETAINING WALL Ilk 0 S �El - S. 0 > Z LANDSCAPING 7 -S4mE —EN— PA VERS STONE PATH INN ---BRICK 931.5 CONTOU R V, M? --RETAINING ni —WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SHRUBS WALL `K Q R C�SAHT NO, 75 BE 6 U S LA CARING E IF IT B ICK F� ORD It epl '.T / �� 6 �� 1� SOD I:e 'T 'k y AREA for I M` k N CONTOUR It , / KIP It A A 01 LL E, Y 4- 9,, ---- EDGE OF DELIME�ATED "--�-,WEDAND 319.85 'T' H 1AI Z7_ ..! I ) —_ --- -hI, LAKE MINNETONKA 11 — - — CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MARTHA HEAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Thtt I It If 01,11—It Llt 1, S11tKI 15, T, hip 117, RIYgb 23, Id f th. ht—ti.I. m ..id S -ti- 15. d_'ib,d — f.h.. C.—T—i bt M-hdb, C ... ,, HE. 63 IFtRd m thb —th limb If L.id S.tt,Er 15; th.— NI,th 89 59 ,i—fi, 59 ,� W -t --d h—mg I.Ig —id hl,th Irl, I di�t. bf 458.47 fI,A t, th, tIlly ,ight-,f-w,y lim, f th, St RIO, Mi .... p,li, ,it M,,it,b, G,,,t N,,thI,,) R,11,,y; ti S-th 17 dq.... 07 ,imt 41 D, ... d, W�t, .1,,g .id t,,ly 691 by I i'T I ItI, IT If 11A2.Ell fT1 lb th, i f b"i,,i,g bf I., N, � hi dI W_ I , Hit A! ILI di,ili III— N.Ith 72 t,g— 19 s—.hd, I f 6 f-1, 111. 11 th, lill If Lb�,, Mh't,,k,; th ... .. t,,Iy, 111thIlly, ,,th,,Iy Id ... t,,Iy, ["' "i" Th" b 'bih, _ _id I.t,,,ly Iigi li- di 't_t 360 f_t, 111, 11 1 -til f1l, Ill .nt bf bT,l,1' iIg"; th—I N-th 17 dIg 07 41 -.Id, E—t. d—g -id —t-ly Ight-.f-..y di,lb— f 360 f -R ,,I, , I—, t, th, p,!,t If b,gi,,I,g, T.g,,thb, with . --l-i- �ppi, --t f., mg-- ..it Ig—, i, W.L I- f —d G ..... -1 L.t 1 d .... ib,d - f,11— B`g II IT It I p-l't .' —d ,,ly ,ght-.f-..y 162&91 f,Wt ... th f— ti I-1, — If -id SILtti- 15, - -.-d E.,g bd w11t11ly li'ht-If-Ily lih, th-1 S-th 72 dIg, 52 r,r-t.. 19 —Id. th_L I 'd� E.tt I dh,t� ,f 50 00 hTt; NA,t 62 dg.... 07 it� 41 —, E -t I dii f 35.36 f11t; th— I N-th 17 h,gir— 07 —.6,, 41 Idi, E—t I dii3O.I., f 178 60 W,t: th— — S.Ith 72 h,g— 52 19 .... d, EP,t I d.,t,,,, f 25,00 fii t, th, 111tIlly light-If-Ily III, If th, St P-1, Mi .... p,IH, b-it,,b. Amt N-th-l-) R.il—, th— S-th 17 dIg—, 07 n -i -t— 41 --di, WItt, .1—g s.id t,Ily "gli —y I—, I -t.... If 203,60 fLIR It— S.,th 62 db,- 07 , 41 .,,,d, W.t , -t ... I If 35,36 fi,.t, III— N.,th 72 dRg,IR. 52 -bi-tI. 19 —Idit yAHt . dIt ... � ,f 75.00 fiEiA t. t.,d w-t.,Iy ,ight-.f-..y III, th—, N.Ith 17 J,g 07 rni—t— 41 --hdI E.bR .1..g dd ti,,Iy i III, di,ft—, If 25GO f"t U, th, p,,,t If H�m,img, ., ,t fIrth , CR D., N. 8518737� NOTES: 1. Th. MR,,t.t[.b f thi. b—Ii ytt I b—d I, th. i III. f S.Iti., 15, T.—hip 117, Rbhq. 23 whimh lit .... . I d R, I— I b,.Iilg It N.,th 89 d,,g—, 59 rni—t— 59 —i -Al, W -t 2, Th, ,,, , w:f HE, p,,p,,ty t, th, h... lim, f L,k, III ... t,,k, 1, 3,79 ..... . ... .. I 3� N, V, Ilk w,, f,,,i,h,d f,, th, p,,p,,,ti,. If th,, —by t, —ify th, I,g,l d—ph , th, bt— If .,y ii—i ., --bir.— ff-t,lg HER pl.pR,Ity 4. E.,tirg tilit—, P,d .d,,gid tiri �h h-., I,— bb -d pb, Ilb-d i V. ifi-t!" hd b -ti., If .11 tilitim. Id ... VK- &-ld III bt.i,.d I— th� w— If tti p�.tjw. tIliti- p,i,I U, .,y d,Hiq, I ... mg I .I ... ti., 5 BENCHMARK. W.t., .1-6- 1p�l th. City If 0-. wIC.h. - Atg-t 17th, 2016 � 92946 f -t, 6 Wbt-d W11 pli-f—Id by A,d ..... E,g g If LLC - A,g,,t 10th. 2016. EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS I �l, ...... h,d,, g ... bt, b—t h H,) - 4.461 6 S F, 2� G ... �i d,[,- - 1 5,411D S.F� 3� 11pIII1, Ilk,, p,th,, Idgi,g) 1,6706 BE, tit q 1, lb�.,,i�, 75 f-1 A00A &F. �: �i,bibb ;,h.,%..tb-k) 6, R,, I , II -t IT 75 f- Ih., -tib-1k) 1082 SY, T.tbl HI,d.I,I, � 22,425A ST. T,b,I L.t A- (tI th—h-) 165,138.1 S,F. E.i,tmg H -d—, PM,t.g� - 13,58% It OVERHEAD WIRES CONCRETE SURFACE 0 30 60 90 61 GAS METER GRAVEL SURFACE =0111im" M VENT SPOT ELEVATION E ELECTRIC CUTLET POST _920� EXISTING CONTOUR LINE SCALE IN FEET ' OR TR BE PROPOSED BUILDING FOUND CAST YEON MONUMENT It FOUND A)DICIAL LANDMARK jav `KE m� 50 LEGEND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MARTHA HEAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Thtt I It If 01,11—It Llt 1, S11tKI 15, T, hip 117, RIYgb 23, Id f th. ht—ti.I. m ..id S -ti- 15. d_'ib,d — f.h.. C.—T—i bt M-hdb, C ... ,, HE. 63 IFtRd m thb —th limb If L.id S.tt,Er 15; th.— NI,th 89 59 ,i—fi, 59 ,� W -t --d h—mg I.Ig —id hl,th Irl, I di�t. bf 458.47 fI,A t, th, tIlly ,ight-,f-w,y lim, f th, St RIO, Mi .... p,li, ,it M,,it,b, G,,,t N,,thI,,) R,11,,y; ti S-th 17 dq.... 07 ,imt 41 D, ... d, W�t, .1,,g .id t,,ly 691 by I i'T I ItI, IT If 11A2.Ell fT1 lb th, i f b"i,,i,g bf I., N, � hi dI W_ I , Hit A! ILI di,ili III— N.Ith 72 t,g— 19 s—.hd, I f 6 f-1, 111. 11 th, lill If Lb�,, Mh't,,k,; th ... .. t,,Iy, 111thIlly, ,,th,,Iy Id ... t,,Iy, ["' "i" Th" b 'bih, _ _id I.t,,,ly Iigi li- di 't_t 360 f_t, 111, 11 1 -til f1l, Ill .nt bf bT,l,1' iIg"; th—I N-th 17 dIg 07 41 -.Id, E—t. d—g -id —t-ly Ight-.f-..y di,lb— f 360 f -R ,,I, , I—, t, th, p,!,t If b,gi,,I,g, T.g,,thb, with . --l-i- �ppi, --t f., mg-- ..it Ig—, i, W.L I- f —d G ..... -1 L.t 1 d .... ib,d - f,11— B`g II IT It I p-l't .' —d ,,ly ,ght-.f-..y 162&91 f,Wt ... th f— ti I-1, — If -id SILtti- 15, - -.-d E.,g bd w11t11ly li'ht-If-Ily lih, th-1 S-th 72 dIg, 52 r,r-t.. 19 —Id. th_L I 'd� E.tt I dh,t� ,f 50 00 hTt; NA,t 62 dg.... 07 it� 41 —, E -t I dii f 35.36 f11t; th— I N-th 17 h,gir— 07 —.6,, 41 Idi, E—t I dii3O.I., f 178 60 W,t: th— — S.Ith 72 h,g— 52 19 .... d, EP,t I d.,t,,,, f 25,00 fii t, th, 111tIlly light-If-Ily III, If th, St P-1, Mi .... p,IH, b-it,,b. Amt N-th-l-) R.il—, th— S-th 17 dIg—, 07 n -i -t— 41 --di, WItt, .1—g s.id t,Ily "gli —y I—, I -t.... If 203,60 fLIR It— S.,th 62 db,- 07 , 41 .,,,d, W.t , -t ... I If 35,36 fi,.t, III— N.,th 72 dRg,IR. 52 -bi-tI. 19 —Idit yAHt . dIt ... � ,f 75.00 fiEiA t. t.,d w-t.,Iy ,ight-.f-..y III, th—, N.Ith 17 J,g 07 rni—t— 41 --hdI E.bR .1..g dd ti,,Iy i III, di,ft—, If 25GO f"t U, th, p,,,t If H�m,img, ., ,t fIrth , CR D., N. 8518737� NOTES: 1. Th. MR,,t.t[.b f thi. b—Ii ytt I b—d I, th. i III. f S.Iti., 15, T.—hip 117, Rbhq. 23 whimh lit .... . I d R, I— I b,.Iilg It N.,th 89 d,,g—, 59 rni—t— 59 —i -Al, W -t 2, Th, ,,, , w:f HE, p,,p,,ty t, th, h... lim, f L,k, III ... t,,k, 1, 3,79 ..... . ... .. I 3� N, V, Ilk w,, f,,,i,h,d f,, th, p,,p,,,ti,. If th,, —by t, —ify th, I,g,l d—ph , th, bt— If .,y ii—i ., --bir.— ff-t,lg HER pl.pR,Ity 4. E.,tirg tilit—, P,d .d,,gid tiri �h h-., I,— bb -d pb, Ilb-d i V. ifi-t!" hd b -ti., If .11 tilitim. Id ... VK- &-ld III bt.i,.d I— th� w— If tti p�.tjw. tIliti- p,i,I U, .,y d,Hiq, I ... mg I .I ... ti., 5 BENCHMARK. W.t., .1-6- 1p�l th. City If 0-. wIC.h. - Atg-t 17th, 2016 � 92946 f -t, 6 Wbt-d W11 pli-f—Id by A,d ..... E,g g If LLC - A,g,,t 10th. 2016. EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS I �l, ...... h,d,, g ... bt, b—t h H,) - 4.461 6 S F, 2� G ... �i d,[,- - 1 5,411D S.F� 3� 11pIII1, Ilk,, p,th,, Idgi,g) 1,6706 BE, 4 D It. b = 3 3.1 S.F. 1, lb�.,,i�, 75 f-1 A00A &F. �: �i,bibb ;,h.,%..tb-k) 6, R,, I , II -t IT 75 f- Ih., -tib-1k) 1082 SY, T.tbl HI,d.I,I, � 22,425A ST. T,b,I L.t A- (tI th—h-) 165,138.1 S,F. E.i,tmg H -d—, PM,t.g� - 13,58% PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 1. B,ildlIgii Ahbh 9—g- i g—b.. b.It ii - 5,334.6 SF. Z G ... It dIl— - 15,411P S�F� 3, C. -i (.p,.-, ..Ik., p.th, ii = 1,600N 5 F, 4� 589A PT I 75 R"I -bb-k) = 400A A F, 6 R i i A .,t " 75 f..t �h -tb.,k) - �ji 10B 2 A F T=�� H.,d. 23,444A S.F TI L,t A ... (t. th.,,Hne) - 165,138.1 S,F. EtLg H,,d ... ,I p ... t.gb - 14 20% CERTIFICATION: F—by —Itty th.t this I,ey, pit, I r,p,rt — p-p—d by IT, IT -di,, -hy di,,,t i,p ... K- -d th.t I I, d,ly Li ... �d L—d S,y,I .d� th, III, If th, St,tt bf M --t, D.t� ,y. t 18, 2016. D W ... y 9, 2017. LID, J %.rd bih—t. U-- N.. 22033 0 MANHOLE X— FENCE REVISIONS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LIGHT -/////,BUILDING LINE 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapotis, Minnesota 55413 P410NE: (612) 466-3300 I Ag E FN FAX: (612) 466-3383 Egan. Field & Nowak, Inc. WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM I.PYRIGHT� 2017 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWAN, INS Land surveyors since 1872 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION POWER POLE WITH LIGHT 1-1 COMMUNICATICN BOX 1 01/09/17 PROPOSED GUEST HOME & HARDCOVER CALCS — 'Dz UTI LITY POLE ED AIR CONDITIONER JOB NO. xxxxx FILE NO. xxxx CHECKED BY: LJN GUY ANCHOR SIGN OVERHEAD WIRES CONCRETE SURFACE 0 30 60 90 61 GAS METER GRAVEL SURFACE =0111im" M VENT SPOT ELEVATION E ELECTRIC CUTLET POST _920� EXISTING CONTOUR LINE SCALE IN FEET ' OR TR BE PROPOSED BUILDING FOUND CAST YEON MONUMENT FOUND A)DICIAL LANDMARK rILLU bUUK I VAU11= 2791 59 I-ILLIOWUKIN CHIE : SW DRAWN BY: REVISIONS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SURVEYFOR: Martha Head PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapotis, Minnesota 55413 P410NE: (612) 466-3300 I Ag E FN FAX: (612) 466-3383 Egan. Field & Nowak, Inc. WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM I.PYRIGHT� 2017 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWAN, INS Land surveyors since 1872 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 01/09/17 PROPOSED GUEST HOME & HARDCOVER CALCS — DRAW G NAME: IN 36852 C3D.d.g LCC JOB NO. xxxxx FILE NO. xxxx CHECKED BY: LJN 52 1-0 11 FOUNDATION PIER PLAN I I I SCALE I /B" = I - 0 RLAN NO z 0 F -- Ll z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 U) w Q w I Ll Lo m 7o - - - - - --- - - - - D r - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - -1 F -1 F- 2..' so -E-! g,15 E -o 2*� 2 2 0 o 2–c ..U)t 'z2'8m'-' -180=16 ' Ez— . - � c' "i � �lc " 2 -J L- -J w-2 0 F: -O o0EIS,6 OF 21 :E -p 10 2 0 w 0 0 0.2 cLr= w-5 Q) o - 0 1 (D o' E- L - - - - - - - - - - J I o a) cL E m<.2 ul w - W > m m z F- C) Z w Z Ln < J z IL 0 Z U z 'c w 0 0 IL L 0 IN -s� ri I u 2.0 u Fl Fl - - - - --- - - - - - J -L - - - - - - - - - - - -J L - - - -J L - - - - Li !� - - - - - - F!i - - - - --- Q� 7p� 1 - - - - -- MAIN FLOOR PLAN ABOVE SHOWN DASHED 0 HELICAL PIERS SUPPORT MAIN FLOOR BEAM STRUCTURE, TYPICAL " r I FOUNDATION PIER PLAN I I I SCALE I /B" = I - 0 RLAN NO z 0 F -- Ll z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 U) w Q w I Ll Lo m 7o D E' -6 I Z E�l m 0 11 w, 02 215 2..' so -E-! g,15 E -o 2*� 2 2 0 o 2–c ..U)t 'z2'8m'-' -180=16 ' Ez— . - � c' "i � �lc " 2 15 c5'� o &.2 ! 2 '.� 0 , 0-2 1 w-2 0 F: -O o0EIS,6 OF 21 :E -p 10 2 0 w 0 0 0.2 cLr= w-5 Q) o (D o' E- o o a) cL E m<.2 ul w - W > m m z a M Ln C) Z w Z Ln < J z IL 0 Z U z 'c w 0 0 IL LL 0 IN -s� A 2.0 MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE 1/8" = l' -O" PLAN [-'-, NO plr--To� I, - MAIN FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE : 2412 S.F. (INCLUDING COVERED PORCHES, BUT NOT STOOPS OR LANDINGS) z 0 Lo z 0 Ll I 0 LL F-- 0 z z L9 Lo w Q Ll w I Ll Lfl 0 00 _01 -2. 2 16 ; OZ A I . - s 0.80mc -mo 22 2 �9'z - 0. cc E - c .'�! yt 0.2 o w 0 -:5 cm ot. E , m o E pc.�p 0 C. a) W .2 :E' 0 '-J � 0 0.2 �' ca -E w -s a) o :�'"E -0 E 65 a) 0 ca o.r- (u 4-� .0 a)— 0 CLL5 � cn 2 M,?: E m< ca Lo W- W ? — M w Lo w < z Ln m > W :1 z w z w E -J < z ul Z 0 0) cl 0 N A 2.1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN I I I SCALE 1/8" - 1 - 0 PLAN [-", N 117�) z 0 0� F - LO z 0 Ll I 0 LL I-- 0 z z 0 LO w Q Ll w I Ll LO n o H-� f2 M�Q�W,�O- IS 7� 2 MaT3 0, < E -Rs m 0 E o M E- 0 E:- 6 -0 ,D - 'E E 0) 0 cLt5 oc 41 ID E m<2 W - w > 0) M Ld Q w Lo > < z Ln co w W —i z wz ff < 0 —1 < 1 0 Ld IL co z 0 0 0 0 A �952-1 112" TOP OF UPPER FLOOR WALL / RO (B' -O .. FIN—R. TO FIN—G) + 6' - 9 1/4" SUBFLOOR 1344!-0 1/13" TOP OF UPPER SUBFLOOR 942'-7 3/8" TCP..OF MAIN FLOOR WALL / FLOL (9'-0 FIN. FLR. TO FIN, CEIUNG) T T-7 �-2 1/2" SUBIFLOOR SOUTF SCALE 1/12 2 WEST I �� J -O SCALE 1/E FAINTED WOOD LATTICE SCREEN SKIRTING IIDPOINT OF ROOF SABLE DP OF MAIN FLOOR z 0 Ll Lo z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 Lo w Q w I 0 Lo 'o E 3 -6" MSL (MCWD LOIA TOP OF MAIN FLOOR SUBIFLOOR t'93 932�-rs" CITY OF ORONO RFPE + 93o -r." T.o. GRACE SOUTF SCALE 1/12 2 WEST I �� J -O SCALE 1/E FAINTED WOOD LATTICE SCREEN SKIRTING IIDPOINT OF ROOF SABLE DP OF MAIN FLOOR z 0 Ll Lo z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 Lo w Q w I 0 Lo 'o E -T o =0 '24i Em .0 I. . -M.2, �s 2,2.2 2 D M.G.2 ;.s 4 02 0 0 C —i 0 ig @01 'E L—q -5- CE CL L) 0 a) -0 a) a),8 �iLE-5 — 2 . ;LE 0 a) a) 0- 2 3: 0 co < CD w - W Q M w Ln W z Z Ln co 3: 0 -i w z + 0 > in z w 0 cl w 0 Lo A 3 . 0 ELEVATION PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION SHOWING NORTH WALL OF ENTRY BEYOND SCALE 1/B" = l' -O' z 0 I -- Ll Lo z 0 Ll 0� 0 LL F-- 0 z z U Lo w 0 w I Ll Lo 'o w LE —02 C.z,= E z:F .0 0 0. -E , o 1. 0 t o.S 0 o o m OE 0 0. E2 A 0 -0 'i� -a 2 c, -.8 OL 0 :5 2 < 00. - E E 19 m 0 2 -162 E' ' -�3 :E Z �: 2 ID 0 10 40) ID r . lo-- ::j Z 0) >, & E Z) 75 (D a�8�0 raim k;75 E a) 0 m 21(t L) � 16 �:- .2 -0-c w 2 3: c: 0,3r E ca< m lx� Ul w - W 0) M z w Ln 0 z Lf) -i z w a :E < 0 C3 > I Z W 01 z 0 m 0 Eq .2 A 2 3. 1 a_ cn z 0 F -- Ll z 0 0 I 0 LL F-- 0 z z 0 10 w Q w I Ll 10 E Eo -6 -0 E j,-� mD E 0 E, 0 0-2 0.-. 0 0. .L. (n ff =0 -:5 0 2 cs.tcoc�o W<Omo 0=�L E E 0. E . 2' 'A 2 .-L 5,0� .2 .2- ar-, .2 0 a).g ca E cn (D o o 0 C a) 0 Co OC o 0 ID o -c I 5L E r- a) co Lj W > 0) M 10 z Q Lj Ln Ld 0 < z Ln w _j z w E 2 + < 0 > w CO z 10 0 0 of _j < LLJ 0) 0 w 0 cq A ID 0 .2 3.2 0- �952 -1 1121, TOP OF UPPER FLOOR WALL / RCi (S' -O FIN—P. TO FIN. CEILING) + Is.' - 9 1/4" SUBFLOOR .933'-r," MSL (MCWD L13W TOP OF MAIN FLOOR SUBIFLOOR 93z' -r." - CITY OF ORONO RFPE + 930'-r." T.D. GRADE STRUCTURE AND DISTURB MINIMAL SOIL (OPEN CRAWL SPACE UNDER FLOOR STRUCTURE) BUILDING CROSS SECTION SCALE 1/B" = l'-OII DPOINT OF ROOF GABLE 3P OF MAIN FLOOR z 0 F -- Ll ul z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 ul w Q Ll w I Ll Lo o E w o 944!-0 I/B" TOP OF UPPER SUBIFLOOR 942'-7 3/B" 0 TCP,,OF MAIN FLOOR WALL / FLOO .0 (9'-0 FIN. FLR. TO FIN. CEILING) '6 : 1/2" SUBFLOOR .933'-r," MSL (MCWD L13W TOP OF MAIN FLOOR SUBIFLOOR 93z' -r." - CITY OF ORONO RFPE + 930'-r." T.D. GRADE STRUCTURE AND DISTURB MINIMAL SOIL (OPEN CRAWL SPACE UNDER FLOOR STRUCTURE) BUILDING CROSS SECTION SCALE 1/B" = l'-OII DPOINT OF ROOF GABLE 3P OF MAIN FLOOR z 0 F -- Ll ul z 0 Ll I 0 z z L9 ul w Q Ll w I Ll Lo o E w o 11 LE I? 0 E- o i-� Sn b .0 '6 2'� 2 0 0 0' �.— -o-o.mm--6 g --,. ao:� 8 0 i fE Is E I. 0 E E2!' 2 M.F.T co C C ID 0 , 2 . 2 c �so -� �i E�T-5,0 o 0-0 o c: =3 E 0) 0 0"—a- u — 15 -c ;:"� 0 a) z 0 E2 2� p '3: E —0 ul Li W > z a 0) 0 0 M w Ln L9 z Ln ca z Ll z LJ w Ln En z c En 0 M 0 Ll A 4.0 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 7-1010 5KOF-C-UIN15- L?P-jVe 00-ONCI I MO 95;'11 Osuo Prepared by: I-AruaZ� �AL-UA-00 AfZ�+ITftTU(LC— UUA) Date: L - lb - U L'+ , F It L-19 4 9 a w,% r- - wc (F-FN)--je7Vp.V-G�y. S.LB.1,0L(p Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) CTFler 1 Tier2 Tier3 Tier4 TierS Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify g1l items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24' x 30') (720 S.F.) A e-il'012-Y WQVQ r-PLAME Ir+0USE I M�CA y uA it- S.F. B CAe k t4 C WU . pEf.Y- +46r otj -;uiLyeY) I A ME r, V L, A R, t -4 -lo .7-57S.F. C 6 ALS E el n AT ?-0- 1 W -17 1"27. 1 Y, 17. - (a t (p 5 . 0 (0 S. F. D VtJ?Ap- ttOVSe -'b! Q4 E ) 1'�'A' X US-$ S -F. E eAFAVE-L- M%VC-WA'(5 AND r-Aill S VAANIVVS LQ1A-nbt,/$ S.F� F "14trE-Te APKotse,- 51por-,. ->TC-re, VA?J0VS WCAT1005 S. F. G 5T 0 K E7 ?AT ki S y6&10V5 I-nCA-noms o 1- S. F. H !jT0fqe IEPe, (N (A FAVC-F-� , Fzog-PMS "FIDVS L0t--A-r[V1J4 (v '4 1. (,2 S. F. IP t4a F-11 M . r- ftilse- I Mau UA Ilk, 2, 1; . I S. F. CAs�po vecr-� s -l -A try- 10 Y, to (go S. F. K aAMN-f-A BmIyeAt / Pecr- 15 Y- ?- 0 1 00 S. F. L ReTAjfjIKej htA"$ W119 71.5'SETBACK VA f M 0 U S L-04,irr I t N 5 400.,4 S. F. M 9ETAININ4, VjhLLS KaT 4IN SC-TBACK 93 4 X. I- I DID I- S. F. N S. F. 0 S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S.F. Y S.F. z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover C7te C -P N Suf-VP-y 9. 1 b. SO 1& 2 2, IK5.- If S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): E Fflt-rl OW 6f: 4NAVC-L. e&'Bj /AC4E--S5( ISLC- &MF Y� 11 CoSo S.F. F:igs-r im !jr- op P Air fymr f1posr-, VA&I t- p 100 S.F. KETAitjWe% wAi-.k, iaDX WM 715' OF- L4re e�,4 K 1- 08, 1X- S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover I- S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 2.1 2- S.F. (4) Total Lot Area I(p5.1 8 . I S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) - (4)] F �- 0-f % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Variance Application - May 2016 Page 7 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: / krsflo Prepared by: (7 Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)(2j=iert,)Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER L/� / 71--( /,,,/ 7--5 47� �-- �-) In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by lefter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A <f-.> A jQ A j _3 15 K 10 i 2- -57 4/i:�:) S. F. B zl�"A z IF- a C-> 12, GP >,- 1 -3 1 6 !S- S.F. C f4o tA S E- 6 w i r"M i eJ -75� I ZAE-60 i -A P- i S.F. D oecj< & &Aze13r--> I RA 6 & 0 LA A- ci S.F. E 5 -rc> &I F- PA7-�L-1 & L) i -A iZ 2 2_ S.F. F &RWeF bfe1ve1PA-r#4S C w i rM L) 4�A 0- 6? -3 E, S.F. G pe�C-K&&ARAc�;e C-)1rt40,-J 75-11 1 R 'a' C' U C -A 9- 1 tt S.F. H AC --/A I ",j I " -6 L V L,1- 5; &—� I -r(A ' -�J 7 5-1_)_ J?-AE7&L)i-A k 2YO S.F. cc-�" a P -e -ra 6�:!Jrkt" '7-1!rl) / RAE& Ui-A /Z 5 1 <D S.F. PA V F-- A, P70P 0 a12-5 (LJ VrH I fj -j5 i 1AjeF&,,)4-,4A S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover j( L�j 1714 1 N4 -7 ig Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage (3) + (4) % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 The clea car Mir M, 91 r Of 929.7 x929.5 108, N, th — — I 1� I mo X, EDGE OF DELINEA TED Tog 40%, WT.ANO N72 '0 SU5tVEy 014E ...... It -52'19"w sac 6 se� .23as x9ja5 PEET Eas 929-5 __\l the —931.5 CONTOUR 50 min Mar x9jaj ri LAKE MINNETONKA 50 X929.4 'PO)NT OF rlg� 0, x9jaii disi BEMNNING N, S40RE LINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA 79j, — — — 11 FIELD LOCA7ED AUGUST 187H. 2016--,, 4 CONCRETE WOOD STAIRS-, STAIRS X92&5 RETAINING X922.9� LL C A WAI I --RETAtNING F.F.E. T 9335 -F.F.E. '93" 5--7 932.8 LANDSCAPING 179.7J I X929,4 N, L 2. INA4G --src PA TV SURWY lJNE 3. 1 f -STONE If c J1. PA VERS SOD -Y -S TONE PATH % 940 x 930. 3 ETAINING x030.6 19W4 tD 4—BRICK F—x S. I Ott, BoRorf I S- 6. 1 931.5 CONTOUR ig , 0�\ WSIM Y RIGHT OF WAY OF SHRU6S _j IAIL C.S.A.H. NO. is Soo Z. ..2 LANDSCAPING 5, RETAWN 2. LS-- -6R K hi N W, 14 4 I �ORDEI/ x9jol 5 04 SOD ;PE 6. LANDSCl AREA w cl Cie— ----931.5 CONTOUR TO To XJ?302 3, x9joe QIV Ex xw" cj k p C12' v BOUL ER It C WALL, lc� - u h X9ja2 clul) x 9-V 'i V cby, , I 0 C0/vr 0 x9ja5 Dot, Dot, p" 4 X93ail Xl Jr 929., x.9ja i Mini 9. 1 DEL111A 1 a k TLAND 1w \y STONEI.- PA .61 'At 'j LAKE MINNETONKA __F_xj-5_T'LNCA FOROCOVEF-� Key N 0 -10 qH6lq'-eL'lw6 L)Pl OrD LEGEND C "or ro 5CA I -e) 50 0 MANHOLE —X— FENCE LIGHT BUILDING LINE POWER POLE WITH LIGHT m COMMUNICATION B( )a UTILITY POLE ED AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR SGN —0.w— OVERHEAD WIRES B�TUMINOUS SURFA CA 51 GAS METER CONCRETE SURFAC I GRAVEL SURFACE EXISTING HARD COVER S URFA CE WITHIN 75 FEET SO If VESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF C&A.H. NO. 15 'F.& AF f IN A J� Af M, q 10 VKA '-POINT sc VETONKA OF BEUNNING 87H, 2016--, 77 -7 -- / Al If VESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF C&A.H. NO. 15 'F.& AF f IN A J� Af M, q 10 J "ki o City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Dr� nrmA k * 2,610 �ft" L-1 fie t>P_kVe OR -ON 0 1 MW 59 -3 11 1 M + A 11 V Y Whvf�C� VLkANP M1U+tTer_r0" CIUMA) ez%Aij I F t E L- P � N o w^ r- t t -t L er- t4 ) sv itv& y Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) (:fie—r 4) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 (8 - 2D q Tier 6 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75' setback line and calculatp hardr-over souare footaoe seDaratelv for each Dortion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey Length x Width Total Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F) A 'L - 5ro ?,%f W 0 0 P r- P -A �A Iz ttn U S I- I P -9f CA U LI& fZ. S.F. B ?"j?ojF_p t4V-W CABtN WJJ?DF-C-ViE�z t Nre&U UA P_ 1,4p 4 3, 2.5' S_ F_ C -&M-C-50 JkT POINT7 v�,-1 X 12.!e 1 :5, 01, S. F. D ry�W ttpy�e NOTGO AS eAMLAckC-) 1!2.?2 X tb-s *Z 2 71 S. F. E &My E -L, AMD FAT-17ys VA[f4ovS LOCATIQ9,�_ S S. F. F 60N(.rLE-rr5 h.FMONS, STtmfS, STECS VAKIPPS LOLMIDIJ$ c3 (0:j S. F. G 52TOU15- ?A�TH!�z VAPLIOVS LMMON5 t S. F. H �" N 115 &PC, i N i�, IPA VB1L 5 . 50 ILMM VARttvs JXCAT(DN� I,b S. F. , pec -K I BTL106tp, e 21 - -- 11 - - -E LRIZeAVLAft-n ?_( 2j . I S.F. (, A 7- C- 5 V VE CJ-- / 1 to X_ 1, (yt). V S. F. K C,,A j?, 12 GN V C -4,V- Z PIL 10 A e " )L 9 1 oc). 0 S.F. L �,Aj4q i �jc,_S ?"f65rap i�A& 9 VARiouc> L.0(jW361J5 ?-I (e. o S.F. M %L-TJ4 ( N (Na :11; 1 Scr Mcr, VAMtnuS LOCATIONS !t6jo,!j S.F. N_ iNMA WMA�S i4nT 'w/w SE-TbACJS VANOvS LZ�AMWS JoA —I- S.F. 0 S.F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S,F. S S.F. T S. F. U S. F. V S. F. W S. F. X S. F. Y S. F. z S. F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 7ee- er-t4 Imposir) supy" S.F. Hardcover (See City Code See 78-1684): -Excludable I OR 0 F- A 12AVBt, MtV 0 V- S. F. _ftf-T ri llt�$ LIS T 10 0 S_ F n P Pf:_-(__r- F RF�E-4ULA S_F_ + S. F. S -F. S. F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover ej *o I- S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] (4) Total Lot Area S -F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1 (3) (4) I N (, (k- E_ ^ e. E, = 0.5& 0/v Variance Application - May 2016 Page 8 LLLiAL UL.i That part of Government described as follows: If Commencing at Meander minutes 59 seconds Weal right- of -way line of the minutes 41 seconds Vilest of the nd to be descrit X929.5 less, to the 9hore line of 7- Z' a point on said westerly thence North 17 degrees X929,. more or less. to the poll ------ EDGE OF DELINEATED To ether with a nonexclu WEILAND described as follows: L' E __11 t '% 102152. B \-PROPasED N S?EFSIL41110111117 I BUFFEER 19,W eginning t a point an XqMj - -------- 35 rOOT PICTLAND Sectl 150 5L11V1 (T-) 6 If ..at on , a MOOM red N' ance of 50.00 a diBt thence North 17 degrees ,-931.5 CONTOUR, '��2L 4 , I_ / minutes 19 seconds East 9MA.- - - - I Manitoba (Great Northern x9jaj right-of-woy line, a dist. MINNETONKA Ch .36 feet; thence North _ce C� - I I fix\ 35 9,0.0 right-of-way line; thenci LAKE X929.4 --POINT OF If distance of 25.00 feet t( 914 BEGINNING SYCRE LINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA X 4- FIELD LOCATED AUGUST IM, 2016--, "b /�qja5 4 5 '-- 1� QIV NOTES: V) PI 9 -- 929- X#29.5 �RETAINING PROPOSED ------ EXIS77NG CABIN lz� \ GUEST 2.40� ALL --RETAtIVING T HOW 1. The orientation of this ro �40 11 assumed to have a be I Jo- I, If W -f 1 0 Q, If I ..a L' f JS 0 1 Iz IR / 0? 2- The or" of the prop4 1 W V4jj;W_ 0 R X 029.4 7-.,8-7 9M.5 �LANDSCAPING 731 77 3. No title work was furr INk any easements or ena WALL _"WY LINE _7 S r 4. Asting utilities. lifervic PA VERS Verification ond locati. -STONE PA TH prior to any design, ill SOD ow� X930.3 XM4 5. BENCHMARK: Water of. �"-e /RTAINI�� X930.6 A 6. Weband delineation wc BRICK X BORD 931.5 CONTOUR !iP, EXISTING H SHRUBS REI TA ININ G 931 u VESTERL Y RIGHT OF WAY OF WILL CSA.H. NO. 15 1. Buildings (homes, gf SOD 'IF & 2. Gravel drives - �1.- 46-0 00.2 ' �; __- P 3. Concrete/stone (cpr LANDSCAPING -4219- 4. Decks/stairs �D czl j 0' "_0 A 11) 4V q / 5 Retaining walls (Insh 6' Retaining ..If. (cut, 8 Total Hardcover A'� Total Lot Area (to shor� -BRICK -0- .930.1 It "w SOD Existing Hardcover Perot LANDSCAPE & , \j Ce C"- "1" -!,7-931.5 CONTOUR AREA V X9ja2 V ..a PROPOSED X 9jor I i j .3'.0 \a, R 1. Buildings (homes, g4 >/ A 1.44 2 * Gravel drives - rl ,\ 3. Concrate/stona (clor 8, ca. mor 4. Elecks/stains v -BOULDER r) j k1' 5. Retaining walls (Inali WALL, Q9# OR, 6. Retaining wails (outt 'V CO/V r I OUR xM2 Toto: Hardcover X9305 X 00. 4 Toto Lot Area (to shor, till, EAsting Hardcover Para x0jal 4 "9.4 93aa X 10 CERTIFICAI Al _C��G0 IILIIEA IE�� f F L TLAND I hereby certify that this 17' duly Licensed Land Su - 4 D a gust 1 If / Dot Januo 'y S TON� 29 El 9 Minnesota Uicerse No. 2 - PA 7NL \ _Z00 929.J LAKE MINNETONKA Of -ONO ID 5tj0F4tLIt4C- Pft- CWT rt 54kLE-,) LEGEND 0 MANHOLE -X-FENCE LIGHT /I'////- BUILDING LINE POWER POLE WITH LIGHT 91 COMMUNICATION BOX 129 'Q UTILITY POLE K9 AIR CONDITIONER ---) GUY ANCHOR SIGN _�._OVERHEAD WIRES CONCRETE SURFACE J GAS METER GRAVEL SURFACE 21 VENT 920.1 SPOT ELEVATION [0 ELECTRIC OUTLET POST 920 EXISTING CONTOUR LINE TREE PROPOSED BUILDING ,--PROPOSED STEPSILANDING WITHIN 75 FEET) AREA =61 SQUARE FEET ------ EDGE 160-00 WE TL LINE-- SuRvr- FOOT WETLAND BUFFER -931.5 CONTOUR'� 90 PROPOSED -----EXISTING CABIN GUES T HOME /-**-, 0 �s. 0 , Q) NDSCAPING Sec. 78-302. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1A one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. C. If the city proposes amendment to the approved design plans or the placement of the structure, notice of the proposed changes shall be mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the parcel on which the structure is to be located. If the proposed structure is to be located within a public right-of-way, property owners within 350 feet of the structure shall be mailed notice of the proposed changes. Notice shall be mailed at least 14 days before the council meeting at which the amended plans will be considered. (2) Gardens. (3) Municipal buildings. (4) Nonrental guest apartments (no exterior ingress or egress). An apartment within the principal residence structure on a lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal residence, including their domestic employees or nonpaying guests. The only means of ingress or egress to the apartment shall be from within the principal structure. Application for such a guest apartment shall address the concerns of parking, sewage treatment, entryway and interior access method. Such apartments shall not have utilities metered separately from the principal residence utilities and shall not have a separate street address. (5) One -family detached dwellings. (6) Publicly owned parks and playgrounds. (7) County dock, when: a. Directly connected to Hennepin County Right -of -Way. b. No overnight boat storage is permitted. C. No canopy is installed. d. Approved by Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. e. Secured with a fence and gate. Sec. 78-303. - Conditional uses. Within any LR -1A one -family lakeshore residential district, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: (1) Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, non-profit camps, and religious camps, provided that: a. All principal buildings are located at least 100 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use; and b. All accessory buildings and structures more than six feet in height are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. (2) Guest houses and nonrental guest apartments. a. Guest houses, provided that: The lot is at least two times the minimum lot area required by this section; and Page 1 The guest house is for the sole use of the occupants of the principle dwelling, including their domestic employees and nonpaying guests. b. Guest apartments with exterior ingress and egress, provided that: 1 . The application for a guest apartment adequately addresses the concerns of parking, sewage treatment, exterior access method, and interior access method; 2. There is at least one access door to the apartment from inside the principal dwelling and this door is the primary means of accessing the apartment; 3. The guest apartment does not have a separate address; 4. The guest apartment's utilities are not metered separately from the principal dwelling; and 5. The guest apartment is for the sole use of the occupants of the principal dwelling, including their domestic employees and nonpaying guests. (3) Keeping of farm animals for noncommercial purposes and for the use of the occupants of premises, provided that: ((Criteria Removed by Staff for Brevity)) (4) Places of worship, provided that all buildings and structures, except columbaria, are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. (5) Planned residential development, limited to detached single-family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of division 10 of this article. (6) Public service structures, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use; and b. The architectural design of the structure is compatible with the architectural design of the surrounding area. (7) Provision of a bathtub or shower in an accessory building. Approval shall be conditioned on provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows from the building plumbing. Approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: a. The council finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with a bathtub or shower will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. b. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory building. c. The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height. d. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory building will not be: Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. Rented, ]eased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. (8) Schools, daycare centers, uses accessory to a high school. a. Pre -kindergarten, primary and secondary public schools and private schools with a curriculum similar to a pre -kindergarten, primary or secondary school. Schools may include before and after school care for students. b. Daycare centers, nursery schools and similar programs that are not associated with a public or private school and serve pre -kindergarten children. Page 2 c. Indoor ice arenas accessory to a high school provided the arena, including accessory uses, is: 1 Located on the same tax parcel as the high school to which itis accessory and is owned by the local school district; 2. Not separated from the high school building by a public road; 3. Operated by the school district or by a nonprofit organization; and 4. All structures are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. (9) Two-family dwelling, provided that: a. Public sanity sewer service is available; b. The lot is adjacent to a commercial or industrial parcel; c. The dwelling is within 200 feet of the commercial or industrial parcel; and d. The design of the dwelling is compatible with the surrounding residences. (10) Columbaria, provided that all portions of columbaria located at or below ground shall be located at least five feet from any adjacent lot line and at least 50 feet from principal structures located on any adjacent property, whether such property is zoned for residential or non-residential use. All portions of columbaria located above ground shall meet the following standards: ((Criteria Removed by Staff for Brevity)) (11) County dock, when: a. Directly connected to Hennepin County Right -of -Way. b. No canopy may be installed. c. Approved by Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. d. Overnight boat dockage for up to two emergency response boats. e. Secured with a fence and a gate. Sec. 78-304. - Accessory uses. Within any LR -1A one -family lakeshore residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (1) Buildings temporarily located for purposes of construction on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. (2) Driveways, sidewalks and parking spaces. (3) Detached private garages and buildings subject to the performance standards of this chapter. (4) Private recreational facilities subject to the pertinent accessory structure location and height requirements of this chapter. (5) Private docks, subject to this code and other applicable regulations, including boat storage density requirements. The accessory use of a private dock shall not include renting space. (6) Kennel structures and dog runs, subject to the provisions of chapter 62, article 3. (7) Fencing subject to the provisions of section 78-1405(7). (8) Signs, as regulated in this chapter. (9) Flagpoles, subject to accessory structure location and height requirements of this chapter. (10) Gardening and other horticultural uses, including arbors, trellises, aviaries and decorative landscape features, and lawn sprinkler systems. Page 3 (111) Compost structures and firewood piles, subject to the accessory structure location requirements of this chapter. (12) Home occupations, as defined in this chapter. All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of section 78-1376, and the licensing provisions of [section] 26-76, when applicable. (13) One temporary roadside stand offering for sale only farm products produced on the premises, provided such stand does not exceed 200 square feet in area and is located at least 30 feet back from the public right-of-way. (14) Storage of recreational vehicles and equipment such as RVs, boats, snowmobiles, etc., subject to the provisions of sections 78-1511 through 78-1515 and 78-1577. Ice fishing houses and similar structures equipped with wheels or mounted on a trailer shall be regulated as recreational vehicles. Ice fishing houses and similar structures not equipped with wheels or mounted on a trailer shall be regulated as accessory buildings and subject to accessory building regulations. (15) Garage sales, yard sales, estate sales or rummage sales, limited to a maximum of four consecutive days and occurring no more than two times within one calendar year per property; and sales of personal or recreational vehicles and equipment, limited to no more than two items per calendar year, and such items for sale shall not be parked in any portion of the public right- of-way, public boulevard, or required front yard except a designated, improved driveway. (16) Laundry drying equipment. (17) Other uses that are customarily incidental to, and subordinate to, the allowed permitted and conditional uses in this district. Sec. 78-305. - Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR -1A district shall exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: DIVISION 5. - FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT (FF) Sec. 78-1124. - Permitted uses. Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in section 78-1125. If no pre-existing, underlying zoning districts exist, then any residential or nonresidential structure or use of a structure or land is a permitted use provided it does not constitute a public nuisance. Sec. 78-1125. - Standards for flood fringe permitted uses. (a) All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor, as defined, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures Page 4 Side Yard Lot Lot Front Side Rear Adjacent Area Width Ya rd Yard Yard to Street (acre) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 2 —7 200 50 30 50 50 DIVISION 5. - FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT (FF) Sec. 78-1124. - Permitted uses. Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in section 78-1125. If no pre-existing, underlying zoning districts exist, then any residential or nonresidential structure or use of a structure or land is a permitted use provided it does not constitute a public nuisance. Sec. 78-1125. - Standards for flood fringe permitted uses. (a) All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor, as defined, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures Page 4 must be no lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill must extend at the same elevation at least 15 feet beyond the outside limits of the structure. (b) Accessory structures. As an alternative to the fill requirements of section 78-1125(a), structures accessory to the uses identified in section 78-1124 may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the state building code, provided that: (1) the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 576 square feet in size, and is only used for parking and storage. (2) All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be: (i) adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls, (ii) be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, and (iii) must have all service utilities be water -tight or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation (3) Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: a. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and b. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (c) The cumulative placement of fill or similar material on a parcel must not exceed 1,000 cubic yards, unless the fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in accordance with section 78-1125(a) of this article, or if allowed as a conditional use under section 78-1126(3) below. (d) The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. (e) All service utilities, including ductwork, must be elevated or water -tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. (f) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (g) All fill must be properly compacted and the slopes must be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. (h) All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation, or must have a flood warning/emergency evacuation plan acceptable to the city. (i) Accessory uses such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at an elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (one percent chance) flood. Interference with normal manufacturing/industrial plant operations must be minimized, especially along streams having protracted flood durations. In considering permit applications, due consideration must be given to the needs of industries with operations that require a floodplain location. (k) Manufactured homes and recreational vehicles must meet the standards of division 9 of this article. Sec. 78-1126. - Conditional uses. Page 5 The following uses and activities may be allowed as conditional uses, if allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) or any applicable overlay district, following the procedures in section 78-1148 of this article. (1) Any structure that is not elevated on fill or floodproofed in accordance with sections 78-1125(a) and (b) of this article. (2) Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (3) The cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a structure in accordance with section 78-1125(a) of this article. (4) The use of methods to elevate structures above the regulatory flood protection elevation, including stilts, pilings, parallel walls, or above -grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages, shall meet the standards in section 78-1127(f). Sec. 78-1127. - Standards for flood fringe conditional uses. (a) The standards listed in sections 78-1125(d) through (j) to all conditional uses. (b) Basements, as defined by section 78-1118 of this article, are subject to the following: (1) Residential basement construction is not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (2) Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with section 78-1127(c) of this article. (c) Where lot size constraints prevent the fill elevation from extending 15 feet beyond the structure, a reduction in the fill extension may be allowed for lots less than 65 feet wide, provided the lots were established prior to October 26, 1978, the initial establishment of a floodplain ordinance. (d) All areas of nonresidential structures, including basements, to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the structurally dry floodproofing classifications in the state building code. Structurally dry floodproofing must meet the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classification in the state building code, which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. (e) The placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel (other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation) must comply with an approved erosion/sedimentation control plan. (1) The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional (one percent chance) flood event. (2) The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the city. (3) The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. (f) Storage of materials and equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation must comply with an approved emergency plan providing for removal of such materials within the time available after a flood warning. (g) Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above -grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if: 1) the enclosed area is above -grade on at least one side of the structure; 2) it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and 3) it is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. The above -noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: (1) Design and certification. The structure's design and as -built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer as being in compliance with the general design standards of the Page 6 state building code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. (2) Specific standards for above -grade, enclosed areas. Above -grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: a. The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a floodproofing technique. There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. The automatic openings shall have a minimum net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net area would suffice. The automatic openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without any form of human intervention; and b. That the enclosed area will be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP3 or FP4 classifications in the state building code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles or storage. Sec. 78-1279. - Placement of structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Structures shall be located as follows: (1) Structure and on-site sewerage system setbacks (in feet) from ordinary high water level. - Public Watei Classificatior NE RD GD Tributary Setbacks Sewage Structure Treatment !d Sewered I System 150 150 75 75 75 1 75 75 75 (2) Additional structure setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body: Page 7 Setback Setback from: (in feet) Top of bluff 1 30 Unplatted cemetery Right-of-way line of federal, state or county highway and local public and private roads * Except for detached garages on lakeshore lots as regulated in section 78-1435 and except for structures subject to less restrictive side yard adjacent to street setbacks as regulated in the various zoning districts. (3) Bluff impactzones. Structures and accessory facilities, except stairways, landings and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (4) Uses without water -oriented needs. Uses without water -oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings per section 78-1282. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the shore setback zone. (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. Sec. 78-1280. - Minimum lowest floor elevations. All structures located within the Shoreland Overlay District which are subject to the floodplain regulations of article VIII of this chapter shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the requirements of that article. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be established as set forth in section 78-1111. All structures constructed within the Shoreland Overlay District shall have their lowest floor, including basement, placed at an elevation no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. Where the regulatory floodplain elevation cannot reasonably be determined, the minimum elevation atwhich the lowest floor, including basement, may be placed shall be determined as follows: (1) For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least three feet above the highest known water level, or three feet above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher. (2) For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least three feet above the flood of record. Page 8 Sec. 78-1680. - Hardcover restriction zones. Within 75 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of any lake or tributary, and within any bluff or shore impact zone, no hardcover shall be placed, located or constructed, except for driveways, stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes as regulated by the shoreland overlay district. Sec. 78-1700. - Specific tier regulations. Per the official stormwater quality overlay district map, each property in the stormwater quality protection overlay district is assigned to a protection tier based on its relative distance to receiving waters. This protection tier dictates the specific protection measures that must be implemented. (1) Tier I parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross lot area. (2) Tier 2 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 30 percent of the gross lot area. (3) Tier 3 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. (4) Tier 4 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross lot area. (5) Tier 5 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 85 percent of the gross lot area. Page 9 AI f7_7N, -Ark I , An' VO ow- -Ark I , An' VO rr, 40 ssz-�- ,Cie- 7 VI --- 71 Ap ';JV " im� �� jr4j wvw Aw, mow -- IN Af, -- Or IF- t 4,0 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . IN ........... Vi ir It 1�f IF I rAl Rz, 7 0 FIR pq , OA.:�Vp XV, MINA, i �qZ I Ig IR ME' � 4" VMS - W5 311t, ON MLNI, Mli� CNN, nM a &S Ar __ "WO -Ai �u yp- Ar vop f" VIA$ - J% Av Ak iw- FPM 4XV Loa, ow aff., kx 77 �"Aocl Ro RU. Ws FAM w uv% x - ROG, IL IV V q 6 M 50 ®r C T, WAR R, . . . . . . . . . . . SQ - 51 'Al OR Ina., ii,'. '114 WN '4' 4-11 _41 - 14 BAN AW NVI �71 am . wt.7 , Al 'Jot:— AN Ir lip ti ir1 zs� CE . Ws y� '4A . 1p INN ZP15A, vni "k - -p . IM, 21, A Rr M go' ®r 4rA 0 A N� I ia *,A Aon '21 AN!"I ........... 47:- At Af J-7 F1 'irk -Z 4f .CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway - PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 (612) 249-4600 PERMIT SITE ADDRESS: 2090 Shoreline Dr PID: 15-117-23-23-0001 WAYZATA,MN55391 DESCRIPTION: Permit Number: Permit Type: Date Issued: P03396 Sewer and Water Permit 7/17/200 Proposed Use: Residential Permit Class: General Permit Type: Sewer and Water Permit Permit Sub-type(s): SAC Only DETAILS: Approved per resolution #: Separate permits required: NOTICES/REMARKS: FEE SUMMARY: SAC Fee: $ 1,100.00 TOTAL FEE: $1,100.00 Valuation: $ 0.00 APPLICANT: DOUGLASHEAD OWNER: DOUGLAS P HEAD ETAL 2090 SHORELINE Dr 2090 SHORELINE DR MN WAYZATA MN -1 55391 TEE -L N-DERSIGNED HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE TEE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED AND AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. --79TU=-M,RMITEE SIGNATURE ISSUED BY SIGNATLiln Copies: City, Applicant, Assessor, Finance Page 2 CI -FY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway - PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 (612) 249-4600 PERMIT SITE ADDRESS: 2090 Shoreline Dr PID: 15-117-23-23-0001 WAYZATAMN55391 DESCRIPTION: Permit Number: Permit Type: Date Issued: P03397 Sewer and Water Permit 7/17/200 Proposed Use: Residential Permit Class: General Permit Type: Sewer and Water Permit Permit Sub-type(s): SAC Only DETAILS: Approved per resolution #: Separate permits required: NOTICES/REMARKS: FEE SUMMARY: SAC Fee: $ 1,100.00 TOTA-L FEE: APPLICANT: DOUGLAS READ 2090 SHORELTNE Dr MIN $1,100.00 Valuation: $ 0.00 OWNER: DOUGLAS P HEAD ETAL 2090 SHORELT-NE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED AND AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIA NLCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. APPLICANT PERMITEE SIGR-AT-U-R-[7- TSSUEDBY SIGNATURE Copies., City, Applicant, Assessor, Finance Page I r CITY OF ORONO GENERAL RECEUyr N? .21270 P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, M N 55323 7-1/7-7 19 TEI��PHONE. 473-7358 Recelvedof LLARS A.0 For -7 -;a Amount Fund Object Prog 7rn Div. City of Orono P.O. Box 66 C—stal Bay, MN 55323 (il2)473-7357 07/17/00 11 . 3B, 19 Customer: 2090 SHORELINE DR. #2 SAC GDERAL TAXWE SALES I@ 2M. 00 2200.00 +TX SUBTE!TAL 2,200.00 TAX 0.00 TOTAL SFLE 2 200. OD Check Received 0.00 CHMME 0.00 CLERK* 06 TRANSA 12897 efi.xL 9-- ;? o 5- 0, 1 Wf'AJ pv, I W15 City of Minnetonka Beach 2945 Westwood Road Mailing Address: P.O. Box 146 klqvor Minnetonka Beach, MN55361 17 - Mike Bloom (612) 471-8878 (612) 471-7416 (fax) Dwasurer Kathi Salvog 1* Council Members John Breon SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION ,James M. Gasch Martin J. Leff LETTER OF AGREEMENT Nell E. Mathews This letter of agreement is between the City of Minnetonka Beach (herein referred to as Minnetonka Beach), and the City of Orono (herein referred to as Orono). Due to a cost hardship, Orono is requesting sanitary sewer service from Minnetonka Beach for two (2) homes located in Orono to the north and west of the Arcola Bridge (referred to as the Head property). The connection will be made to the manhole at the intersection of Beach Lane and County Rd. 15 by boring under the waters of Lake Minnetonka fron-�the properties. Orono would like to have this p t completed by 2000.Cfr,- ;-A'\, ro �zt J) )E , I oi- Orono and the landowners will pay all costs incurred for this project including, but not limited to: 0 All construction related costs SAC charges to the Metropolitan Council Permits from Hennepin County and the DNIR Minnetonka Beach sewer connection fee of $2,177.25 per unit A $25.00 inspection permit fee Quarterly Minnetonka Beach sewer fees billed to Orono for each unit Orono will own and maintain the sewer line from the Beach Lane manhole to the Head property. Orono accepts responsibility for any emergency clean ups or risk of liability related to this sewer line. Orono will obtain the inspection permit from Minnetonka Beach at the beginning of the project. Minnetonka Beach will bill Orono the sewer connection fees in July of 2000, or at project completion. Sewer fees (currently $48.00/qtr. per household) will be billed to Orono and paid quarterly. APPROVED: Mite B16"'orn, Mayor City of Minnetonka Beach D ate APPROVED: --� G a City of Orono Date CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . NO. -4 3 6 `3 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER FOR 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE (EMAD PROPERTY) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements for 2090 Shoreline Drive, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law; and WHEREAS, it appears that Minncomm, Mora, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: I The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a construction contract with Minncomm, Mora, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Orono for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements for the 2090 Shoreline Drive property according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $31,936.00. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Orono City Council at a regular Counci I meeting held on November 8,1999. ATTEST: X' find'a S. Vee, City Clerk Gabri Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 HHennepin County Locate & Notify Receipt Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Print Date Mon Dec 12 12:05:39 2016 This is a receipt only with 'paid' stamp or cash register receipt attached Company or Homeowner Name: Laurel Ulland Contact Person: 612 377 5984 Subject Property Address: 2090 Shoreline Dr., Orono Comments: 350' Buffer Distance: 350 feet TOTAL COST: $2b.UU JAN 12 2017 MARIW MCCORNIICK REGISTRAR OFJMES i _ -,A� --- BY i - r- / Mail Label Count: 5 38 15-117-23 21 0006 38 15-117-23 21 0007 38 15-117-23 21 0013 38 15-117-23 22 0001 38 15-117-23 23 0001 RUN DATE: 12/1212016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 15-117-23 210006 M STEWART & R STALOCH 2080 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL STEWART ROBIN J STALOCH 2080 SHORELINE DR WAYZATAMN 55391 38 15-117-23 210007 S D TRUST CO LLC TRUSTEE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 S D TRUST CO LLC C/O LORI ENTEMAN 201 S PHILLIPS AVE 4200 SIOUX FALLS SO 57104 38 15-117-23 210013 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 15-117-23 22 0001 NORTH SHORE MEADOWS LLC 2165 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 GREGG & DENISE STEINHAFEL PO BOX 67 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 15-117-23 23 0001 M M HEAD 2014 Q P R TRUST 2090 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 MARTHA M HEAD TRUSTEE CEANN COMPANY LLC I I 100 WAYZATA BLVD STE 230 MINNETONKA MN 55305 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms ofcertain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 1"I Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map F1Provided By'. Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 12/12/2016 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: 1511723230001 M M HEAD 2014 Q P R TRUST 2090 Shoreline Drive Orono, MIN 55391 10-117-23-33 10-11 23-34 7 15-117-23-22 5-117-23-21 15 1 �5-1 17-23-22 5-117-23,21 15-11 23-23 15-117-23-24 1 5- 2 2 1 23-23 15-1 3-A 15-117-23-24 23 0 120 240 480 ft For more information contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Thiesse commented the application is pretty straight forward. Schoenzeit moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3901, Michael Demenge, 4380 Sixth Avenue North, granting of a variance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 6. #17-3904 MARTHA MYERS HEAD, 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE, VARIANCE AND .. ........ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:28 P.M. — 7:37 P.M "I . .... ............ Martha Myers Head, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for the guest house use in order to reconstruct the existing guest house cabin with a different footprint; a conditional use permit to reconstruct the guest house elevated out of the floodplain on helical piers; an average lakeshore setback variance for the guest house location; and a lake setback variance and hardcover variance to permit a northern entry stoop to be placed within the 75 -foot setback. M The original home and guest cabin on the property was constructed in the mid -1920s. A portion of the lot is below the one percent flood elevation but the existing home has been elevated above the flood elevation. The existing cabin, however, sits lower on the property and has not been elevated above the flood elevation. The cabin was damaged by the 2014 flood waters and the applicant would like to reconstruct and elevate the building. Because the construction and elevation will be done using helical piers rather than fill material, a conditional use permit is required. The construction of the guest cabin will require an average lakeshore setback variance as well as a lake setback variance for the northern stoop to be located approximately 67 feet from the ordinary high water level. The cabin will be at a conforming setback of 75 feet. In addition, a guest house conditional use permit is required as one has not been issued and the guest house cabin is being reconstructed in a different, expanded footprint and is in a nonconforming location. Page IS of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. In regards to the average setback, the home is situated on a peninsula. The property located at 2165 North Shore Drive across the bay is the adjacent property and determines the average lakeshore setback. The home at 2165 North Shore is located approximately 170 feet from the ordinary high water level. According to City Code, the guest cabin must be located equal to or further back from the lake than the home located at 2165 North Shore Drive. The proposed cabin meets the 75 -foot setback from the lake. The northern stoop access to the cabin is within the setback at 67 feet. An additional 61 square feet of hardcover is proposed within the 75 -foot setback. The applicant is attempting to avoid impacting the existing extensive garden features on the property with the new cabin construction. Staff finds that the peninsula configuration of the property functions much like an island yet shares a 6 - foot connection with the property across the bay at 2165 North Shore Drive dictating the average lakeshore setback requirement. The subject property does not block views of the lake froin the home at 2165 North Shore Drive as it is across the water from the home. Staff finds the practical difficulty requirements are satisfied regarding the average lakesbore setback. The applicant has opted to modify the footprint and location of the guest cabin thereby triggering the need for the variances as well as the conditional use permit. Staff finds that the stoop on the north side of the home can be removed as there are three other points of egress. The proposed development suggests hardcover levels beneath the Tier I allowance and there is sufficient pervious area offering infiltration opportunities on the property. The conditions applying to the two different conditional use permits relating to the guest cabin have been satisfied according to Staff. The engineering standards required as part of the floodplain regulations apply to the conditional use permit for the structure and will be reviewed and applied at the permit stage. Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances and conditional use permits as follows: I . Approval of the guest house conditional use permit with the standard covenants; 2. Approval of the conditional use permit to permit the guest house to be constructed on helical piers within the floodplain; and Approval of the average setback variance for the construction of the new guest house cabin. Page 16 of 48 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Laurel Ulland, Architect, stated she would be happy to answer any questions the Commission may have. Thiesse asked how far the proposed guest house would need to be moved to meet the 75 -foot setback. Ulland stated she mistakenly read the ordinances as saying the house could be set at 75 feet without the stoop and that she would prefer not to move the house back. Ulland indicated she is attempting to set the south edge of the new house where the old house was as well as preserve the garden. Ulland stated they can give up the stoop if it is a concern. Thiesse stated unfortunately it will be a concern. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Thiesse commented the stoop was his main concern. Landgraver stated the rationale for average setback in his view does not apply here. Landgraver moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3904, Martha Myers Head, 2090 Shoreline Drive, granting of a variance and conditional use permit as recommended by Staff, with the understanding the applicant will remove the stoop. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 7. #17-3906 JOSHUA/MARKUM BUILDERS, INC., 3472 LYRIC AVENUE, VARIANCES, 7:37 P.M. — 7:52 P.M. Mark Olson, Joshua/Markum Builders, was present, Page 17 of 48 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 11 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 17-3906, Joshua/Markum Builders, 3472 Lyric Avenue - Variances (Lot area and width) - Resolution Presenter: Mike Gaffton, Senior Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to adopt a resolution granting lot area and width variances. 2. Application Deadline. Rcvd: 1/19/17 Complete: 2/1/17 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 4/1/17 3. Background. The applicant requests lot area and lot width variances in order to construct a new residence to replace the existing residence on the property. This small lot would qualify for buildability without area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations; however, a qualifier for taking advantage of that is a hardcover limitation of 25%. This property is in Tier 3 which normally allows 35% hardcover. In order to be able to exceed 25% up to the 35% limit, the lot area and width variance is required. The applicant's initial plans indicated lot coverage slightly in excess of the 1500 s.f. limit for this property — the plans have since been revised to be in conformity with the limit. Please review the attached Planning Commission memo and exhibits. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed this application and held a public hearing at its February 2 1 st meeting, and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the area and width variance request as presented, subject to the following recommendations: 1. No hardcover or structural coverage variances to be granted. 2. Drainage plan should be established to reduce/eliminate drainage to adjacent properties to the extent possible, especially the property to the east. 3. Work with neighbor to the north regarding fence concerns (see draft minutes). The drainage plan will be reviewed by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance. Addressing the neighbor's fence concerns is advisory only, as there is no code requirement that a fence be constructed at the rear lot line. 5. Public Comments. Public comments were received from the neighbor to the immediate east (included in Planning Commission packet) and at the hearing from the neighbor to the north (see draft minutes). The neighbor comments are addressed as part of the Planning Commission recommendation. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A Resolution for approval is attached for Council consideration and adoption. Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R AGENDAITEM 17-3906 March 13, 2017 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the attached resolution entitled A Resolution Granting Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350for Property Located at 3472 Lyric Avenue - File No. 17-3906. List of Exhibits A — Resolution for Adoption B — Notice of PC Action 2/24/17 C — Draft PC Minutes of 2/21/17 D — Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 2/21/17 Prepared By: Mike Gaffron Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R, Council Exhibit A A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-350 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3472 LYRIC AVENUE — FILE NO. 17-3906 WHEREAS, Mark Olson representing Joshua/Markurn Builders. Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter the "Applicant") is owner of the property located at 3472 Lyric Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City'� and legally described as follows: Lot 18, Block 5, NAVARRE HEIGHTS, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2017 the Applicant made a complete application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a new residence on a lot of 6,721 s.f. in area and 50 feet in width where the minimum lot size requirements are 21,780 s.f. in area and 100 feet in width; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017, the Planning Commission on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval of the variances; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS OF FACT: Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. Page I of 6 A2. The Property is located within the LR- I C Single Family Lakeshore Residential District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acres (21,780 s.f.) and a minimum lot width of 100' for construction of a single family residence. A3. The Property is 6,721 s. f. (0. 15 acres) in area and 5 0 feet in defined width, and contains an existing single family residence. The property is considered as legally nonconforming with regard to lot area and lot width. A4. The property is located within Storm Water Overlay District Tier 3 which allows 35% hardcover for conforming lots. In order for a nonconforming lot to qualify for avoidance of the need for area and width variances for redevelopment, the lot would be limited to 25% hardcover. A5. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing residence structure and replace it with a new residence. When applying for the demolition and building permits, applicant was advised that either hardcover would be limited to 25%, or a lot area & width variance application would be required in order to increase that to 35%. Applicant determined that keeping to the 25% limitation would severely restrict the driveway, decks, sidewalks, and potential other amenities desired, hence this application. Setback, height and structural coverage limits will be met; hardcover is proposed at 33.8% where 35% would be allowed if the variances are granted. A6. The Navarre Heights neighborhood consists of single family homes located on Lyric Avenue, Livingston Avenue and Crystal Place, between Shadywood Road and Blaine Avenue. In this neighborhood, 42 homes are on single lots virtually identical in size and shape to the applicant's lot; 22 homes are on double lots; 5 homes are on triple lots; and one home is on a combination of 4 lots. AT The applicant's property has contained a single family residence for many decades. The ability to rebuild on the property in the same manner as other existing developed properties in the immediate neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. The applicant's proposed site plan indicates all required LR- 1 C setbacks will be met, and the proposed house is just under the 1500 s.f structural coverage allowance for lots less than 10,000 s.f. in area. A8. The applicant's property contains a small number of mature trees which provide shade to the property and adjacent properties. While it is hoped that as many of these trees as possible can be preserved during the demolition/rebuild process, none are specifically protected under City ordinances. A9 Surface water runoff from the existing residence has been a concern of neighboring property owners to the east, hence the applicants have indicated an intent to direct all drainage so that impacts to neighboring properties will be reduced or eliminated. Page 2 of 6 A10. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. VARLANCE A.NALYSIS: Bl. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . . " Singlefamily residences are a permitted use within the LR -IC zoning district B2. "Variances shall only be permitted... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The proposed residential princoal structure is a residential use which is consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant tbr the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: i. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." Th e property o wn er is proposing to use th e property in a reason able mann er b ut th e size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. Theplight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of theproperty beingplatted aspart of the Navarre Heights subdivision in 1909, long before local zoning codes were in effect. The Navarre Heights neighborhood consists of lots typically 50feet in width and 130-145 feet in depth. Over time these lots have been developed for individual homes singly or in combinations of 2 or 3 lots together. Construction of a singlefamily residence on a single lot in this neighborhood will not be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. B4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been afactor in the variance approval determination. B5. 'Tractical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as Page 3 of 6 defined in Mim. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. B6. "The board or the council may not pen -nit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the usefor a singlefamily residence is an allowed use in th e LR -1 C District. B7. "T'he board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. B8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The lot size and hardcover restrictions applying to this property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood, B9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 35% hardcover that other developed similar -sized lots are afforded, granting of a variance to lot area and width is required B10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The property lights of the owner will be diminished if the variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to have the 35% hardcover that neighboring simildr-sized lots are allowed B11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting of the variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. B12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Granting of the variances wiff alleviate a practical diffilcully by allowing the property to re -develop under the same hardcover allowance as other similar -sized developed lots in the neighborhood CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new Page 4 of 6 residence on a lot of 6,721 s.f. in area and 50 feet in width where the minimum lot size requirements are 21,780 s.f. in area and 100 feet in width, subject to the following conditions: Council approval is based on the survey and site plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Hardcover on the property shall not exceed 35%. Lot Coverage by structures on the property shall not exceed 1500 square feet. Any amendments to the approved survey or site plan which are not in confonnity with City codes will require ftu-ther Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Applicant shall submit and adhre to a grading and drainage plan that minimizes impacts to adjacent properties. 3. Applicant shall comply with the permitting requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building pen -nit for the project and commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (March 13, 2018). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned Owner/Applicant has read, understands and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Owners and the Owners' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 13th day of March, 2017. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 5 of 6 JOSHUAMARKUM BUILDERS, INC. A Minnesota Corporation By: Joshua M. Olson, Its STATE OF MINNESOTA I (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2017, by Joshua M. Olson, the --- of Joshua/Markum Builders, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SINVEY - PROPOSED . .............. -for- JoshunfMarkurn Buildera6 Inc. ....... ...... C -of- 3472 Lyric Avenue, Orono, MN —a- 7 /7 PROPOSED HARDCOVERARFAS, (See Hardeover Calmiation Worlt�haet) LCYTI�' 18 K Boundaxy Area =61721 SO. FT. A A O� . 79S4 NORTH Occk E �ess 0 T i Vindpw 4" 14.00 OAK LEGEND gal.'s,90 16.0 50 DENOTES AIR CONDIT10NING UN17 1? 9� DENDTES 5XISTING SPOT ELEVAT�ON 90 DENOTES GAS -METER 17/ 7 'V DENOTES HYDRANT M DENOTES MAIL13OX CANTILEVER'--/ PPI P �[b DEVOTES POWER POLE (1) DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE N DENOYES WATER VALVE PROPOSED a—o- DENOTES WOVEN WIRE FENCE HOUSF DENOTES WOOD FENCE DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES EMSTNC C014TOURS Lr) DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS L DE140TES E)QST1NG SANITARY SEWER < to DENOTES OVERHEAD VARE S z DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE 1i -0 DEVOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE LIZ --------------- En E j DENOTES 1317UMINOUS SURFACE P) i: 5z AD DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE J0 -1 __1 Z -1 EXISTING HOUSE L'i 3484 LYRIC AVE V) .... ..... c4 PID; 1711723430157 PRASED 0 CIL_ y GARACE 0 —1 r < EL 20.00 O� PO SED DRIVEWAY -882.a3 i+ T 7 17 ? 0 In X IL =L ..................... .......... 60.30(!�)j 009--l", 7 an4a S810-41;41 W"', TWHM 1q 5R! 4T scale 1"= 10' Drawn By. SNN Project Manager: KDN job No.: 17040HS 0 Denotes iror. Set 1 0 Denotes Iran F,,Id �.,ings shown are Hennepin County Coordinate System (96 adj) I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by Me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws r. goo & SON& INL of the State of Mi t Dated this — 13th day of EebrwoEy . 2017. Professional Land Surveyors _�e: 990 M Avenue Sh Suft 2 License No. 45356 Hutchinson, MN 350 M, .. MaU-== F— MR W -91M WIS(pli je_cV 6 ��7/1 -7 2 9 L IV ylq 1= r-�. -W X33 - qm = 7,0 xz 2- = A/ YD -I,xg P- / )c (— Resolution Exhibit A NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 TO: Joshua/Markum Builders, Inc. 7867 Eastwood Road Mounds View, MN 55112 markC&*oshuamarkum.com ZONING FILE: DATE OF NOTICE: COPIES: (via email) rickbramaC@kw.com katieveeCcDkw.com TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances for 3472 Lyric Avenue DATE OF MEETING: February 21, 2017 Council Exhibit B 17-3906 February 24, 2017 The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the area and width variance request as presented, subject to the following additional recommendations: 1. No hardcover or structural coverage variances to be granted. 2. Drainage plan should be established to reduce/eliminate drainage to adjacent properties to the extent possible, especially the property to the east. 3. Work with neighbor to the north regarding fence concerns. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is scheduled as: Monday, March 23, 2017 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 PM If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please contact Mike GaffronatmqaffronL@ci.orono.mn.u-., or952.249.4622. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Council 6:30 o'clock p.m. Exhibit C 7. #17-3906 JOS1ffUAfMARKUM BUILDERS, INC., 3472 LYRIC AVENUE, VARIANCES, 7:37 P.M. — 7:52 P.M. Mark Olson, Joshua/Markum Builders, was present. Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting lot area and width variances in order to construct a new residence to replace the existing residence on the property. This small lot would qualify for buildability without area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations. However, in order to take advantage of that, they would have to comply with a 25 percent hardcover limit. The property is located in a Tier 3 hardcover zone and would qualify for up to 35 percent hardcover if area and width variances are granted. Gaff-ron displayed a survey depicting the existing house. Gaffron stated the neighborhood consists of lots typically 50 feet in width and 130-145 feet in depth. Over time these lots have been developed for individual homes or in combination of two or three lots together. Staff does not believe construction of a single-family residence on a single lot in this neighborhood would be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant meets the setback requirements. The neighbors to the east have expressed some concern about the location of the house since it will be a couple feet closer to them than the existing house. Other concerns related to drainage, construction impacts, and the character of the neighborhood. The neighbors request that the new home be no closer to their property than the existing residence which is ap . proximately 12 feet from the side lot line. The new home is proposed to be located 10 feet from the property line, just meeting the setback requirements. The neighbors' home is approximately eight feet from the lot line. Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances. The plan has been revised down to 1,503 square feet by reducing the depth of the garage. Staff does not recommend approval of a variance for structural lot coverage despite the fact that it is a minimal overage. The Planning Commission should consider and discuss the issues outlined in Staffs report. Page 18 of 48 N[INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. If the Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met for the area and width variance, then a recommendation for approval would be in order, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall adhere to the 35 percent hardcover and 1,500 square foot structural lot coverage limitations. 2. The applicant shall submit and adhere to a grading plan to be approved by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance showing that drainage from the new residence will have no additional drainage impacts on the neighboring property and, if possible, reduce the existing impacts. While this is a standard building permit condition, it is called out here due to expressed neighbor concerns. Lemke stated the letter from the neighborhood mentions a couple of trees on the property. Gaffron displayed an aerial photograph of the site and pointed out the location of the trees. Gaff-ron noted the pine trees in the front will be eliminated since they are located in the middle of the proposed driveway and that there is some fairly heavy vegetation in the back. Thiesse asked whether the City has any control over the trees. Gaffron stated the trees are not protected since they are not within 75 feet of the lake. Builder Mark Olson, 7867 East Wood Road, Mounds View, stated he will attempt to save as many trees as possible. Olson stated as far as the 1,503 square feet, he has been reducing the size of the house throughout this process and that he can possibly try to reduce the size of the fireplace to reduce the structural coverage down to 1,500 square feet. Thiesse commented it would be a lot easier for the Planning Commission if it was reduced to 1,500 square feet. Olson stated it will be reduced to 1,500. Page 19 of 48 4Q� MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse asked if the roofline drains from front to back. Olson indicated it will and that no water will drain into either of the neighbors' properties. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Cecilia Schulte, 3477 Livingston Avenue, stated she resides in the property located right behind this lot. Schulte stated she currently has an enclosed back yard with a dog, and if they remove the garage, that would take away part of her enclosed back yard. Schulte indicated part of it consists of a wooden fence and part of a chain link fence. Schulte stated if the garage is removed and the fence is removed, she no longer will have an enclosed yard. Schulte stated the garage is right on the property line and that she is not sure whether she has to get a new fence or whether she can receive some assistance. Schulte commented it is a great idea to replace the existing structure but that she is worried about her back fence. Schulte stated she currently is a single homeowner and that she probably cannot come up with the money to put in a new fence. Gaffron asked if there is a retaining wall behind the garage. Schulte stated she and her husband constructed the retaining wall to help with the drainage since their property is lower than the adjacent property. Schulte stated they had the property surveyed when they constructed their garage. Thiesse stated the survey he is looking at depicts the neighbor's garage as being completely on their property and that he would encourage her to talk to the property owners about whether they will be erecting a fence. Landgraver asked if the applicant is considering erecting a fence. Olson stated he has not considered that at this point. Olson stated this is a spec house and that more than likely he will do something back there. Olson stated during construction he can erect a snow fence and talk to the neighbor about what they will be doing back there. Page 20 of 48 M]NUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Leskinen stated the only issue she had was the structural coverage and that has now been -resolved. Thiesse stated in his view the new house is an asset to the community and that it cannot be built without the variances. Thiesse noted the square footage on the property will also be reduced. Landgraver noted the water issues will also be addressed. Lemke moved, Landgraver seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3906, Joshua/Markum Builders, Inc., 3472 Lyric Avenue, granting of variances, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mi i— #17-3903 IJG�WTS 8098 LLC, 2520 SHADYWOOD ROAD, CMCEPT PLAN, 7:52 P.M. – 8:40 P.M. Tom Goodrum, on behalf of Ugorbt� 8098, LLC, was present. Barnhart noted this is a sketch plan revie quest for a 4 -unit apartment building located at 2520. This I request would require a zone change. The ace yswil e off of Shadywood Road via a shared drive with j the Freshwater Business Center. This driveway w line up with the driveway servicing the church across 4 Shadywood. Ultimately the plan is to have the are riveway line up with the new Shadywood Circle access as part of the Shadywood Villas proyct and will llqly remain as a right -in and right -out driveway. Hennepin County supports the propose5Vaccess. The proposal provides for 100 king spaces, which is more than parking spaces per unit. Fifty-one par ing aces of those spaces will be loc under the building and 49 surface space proposed. Two parking spaces per unit are re u' ed by City Code. I Ic Staff expects th ardcover on the site to meet the requirements since the lot lines be reconfigured to adjust the Page 21 of 48 Date Application Received: 1/19/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 2/1/27 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 4/1/17 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Date: February 21, 2017 Subject: #17-3906, Joshua/Markum Builders, 3472 Lyric Avenue - Variances (Area, width, structural coverage) - Public Hearing Application Summary. The applicant requests lot area and lot width variances in order to construct a new residence to replace the existing residence on the property. This small lot would qualify for buildability without area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations; however, a qualifier for taking advantage of that is a hardcover limitation of 25%. This property is in Tier 3 which normally allows 35% hardcover. In order to be able to exceed 25% up to the 35% limit, the lot area and width variance is required. Proposed hardcover as submitted is just under 34% when the 100 s.f. deck hardcover allowance is accounted for. Additionally, as proposed (per revised plans submitted 2/13/17) the new residence will slightly exceed the 1500 s.f. structural coverage limit by 3 s.f., for which a variance is requested. Staff Recommendation: If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the variances are justified, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. Staff recommends approval of the area and width variances. Planning Commission should explore with the applicant whether the footprint can be further reduced to meet the 1500 s.f. limit. Zoning District: LR -1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acres/100' min. width Lot Area/ Width: 6,721 s.f. (0.15 acre), 50' wide List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing Survey Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site plan Exhibit D. Proposed Building Plans & Elevations Exhibit E. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations & Lot Coverage Calculations Exhibit G. Photos Exhibit H. Plat Map Exhibit 1. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Neighbor Comments Received Background The applicant is proposing to remove the existing residence structure on this small lot and replace it with a new residence. When applying for the demolition and building permits, a pplicant was advised that either hardcover would be limited to 25%, or a lot area & width variance application Council Exhibit D FILE#17-3906 February 21, 2017 Page 2 of 6 would be required in order to increase that to 35%. Applicant determined that keeping to the 25% limitation would severely restrict the driveway, decks, sidewalks, and potential other amenities desired, hence this application. Setback and height limits will be met; however, the building plans submitted with the application indicate lot coverage by structures of 1546 s.f., 46 s.f. over the 1500 s.f. limit for this small lot. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET (Variances noted in bold type) LR -1C Zoning District Required/Al lowed Proposed Lot Area 0.50 ac. minimum 0.15 ac existing Lot Width 100'minimum 50'existing Street Setback 30' 30.0' Left Side Setback 10, 10.01 Right Side Setback 100 10.(Y Rearsetback 30' 43.2' Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 6,715 s.f.+ (0.154 acre) Allowed: 1500 s.f. (Lot is less than 10,000 s.f.) Proposed: 2503.2 s.f. Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Overlay Arealn Allowed Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Hardcover District Tier Tier Tier 3 6,721 s.f. 2,350 s.f. (35 %) 2933 s.f. (43.6%) 2270 s.f. (33.8 * 2320 s.f. reflects 100 s.f. deck hardcover allowance deduction APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: 78-350: LR -IC Lot Standards & Setback Regulations. 78-1685: Massing Standards (Shoreland) (1) Non -industrial zoning districts. Except for parcels zoned industrial, all lots in the stormwater quality overlay district that have a gross acreage of less than two acres shall comply with the following massing standards for structures. a. Maximum totatfootprints allowed. 1. On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross lot area. 2. On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. b. Calculation of massing. The following shall be included in the calculation of the total combined footprints by structures: 1. All roofed structures more than six feet above existing ground level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar open structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than six feet above FILE #17-3906 February 21, 2017 Page 3 of 6 existing ground level (if any portion of such structures extends more than six feet above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). 78-1. Definitions Building footprint means the outline of the total area covered by a building's perimeter at the ground level (to the block/foundation). (1) Carports, covered porches and other similar building features which have no exterior walls shall be included as part of a building footprint by drawing a straight line between the outer edges of allsupport structures (and the main building if applicable). (2) The outer edge of building protrusions, bay windows or other similar features that extend outward from a building and are less than four feet from the ground shall be considered as part of the building footprint. 78-1700(3): Tier Hardcover Limits 78-72: Lots of Record (c) A lot of record located in any shoreland district, including the Shoreland Overlay district, RS Seasonal Recreational district, and any of the LR- Lakeshore Residential districts, that does not meet the requirements of this chapter for lot size or lot width shall be subject to the following regulations: (1) A nonconforming single lot of record may be allowed as a building site without variances from lot size and width requirements, provided that: a. All setback requirements can be met; b. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and c. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. d. All other zoning district standards can be met. (3) A lot subject to either subsections 78-72(c)(1) or (2) remains subject to the hardcover restrictions of this chapter, as follows: a. Where the hardcover square footage allotment as calculated based on the assigned tier exceeds 25 percent of the entire lot area, hardcover shall be limited to 25 percent of the entire lot area. Governing Regulations: Variance (Sec. 78-123). In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is FILE #17-3906 February 21, 2017 Page 4 of 6 not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when (staff commentary in bold type): 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Single family residences are a permitted use within the LR -1C zoning district. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed residential principal structure is a residential use which is consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of the property being platted as part of the Navarre Heights subdivision in 1909, long before local zoning codes were in effect; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Navarre Heights neighborhood consists of lots typically 50 feet in width and 130-245 feet in depth. over time these lots have been developed for individual homes singly or in combinations of 2 or 3 lots together. In the opinion of staff, construction of a single family residence on a single lot in this neighborhood will not be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The lot area, lot width, hardcover and lot coverage standards applying to this property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood. S. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 35% hardcover that other developed similar -sized lots are afforded, a variance to lot area and width is required. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. In the opinion of staff, the property rights of the owner will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to have the 35% hardcover that neighboring similar -sized lots are allowed. However, granting of a variance for lot coverage by structures of more than 1500 s.f. is not necessary to preserve property rights, and such a variance is not supported by a practical difficulty. FILE #17-3906 February 21, 2017 Page 5 aF 6 7. The granting of the proposed variances will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. In the opinion of staff, granting of the lot area and lot width variances will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the property to re -develop under the same hardcover and structural coverage allowances as other similar -sized developed lots in the neighborhood. The Commission may recommend and the Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Analysis: Lot Area and Width Variances The Navarre Heights neighborhood consists of single family homes located on Lyric Avenue, Livingston Avenue and Crystal Place, between Shadywood Road and Blaine Avenue. In this neighborhood, 42 homes are an single 50' -wide lots; 22 homes are on double lots; 5 homes are on triple lots; and one home is on a combination of 4 lots. The applicant's property has contained a single family residence for many decades. The abilityto rebuild on the property in the same manner as other existing developed properties in the immediate neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. The applicant's proposed site plan indicates all required LR - 1C set ba cks wi I I be rn et. Analysis: Lot Coverage by Structures Variance The proposed house with a 1503 s.f. calculated footprint is slightly over the 1500 s.f. structural coverage allowance for lots less than 10,000 s.f. in area. Other recently redeveloped lots of similar or identical size in the neighborhood have been able to adhere to the 1500 s.f. limitation, and there is no apparent justification for a variance for this property. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has submitted a partial Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit E, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Note that the need for a lot coverage variance was apparently not known by the applicant at the time this form was submitted, and it does not address that variance. Applicant has been advised of the overage and has not submitted revised plans which reduced the lot coverage from 1547 s.f. to 1503 s.f., nearly meeting the lot coverage requirements. Planning Commission should discuss with the applicant additional ways to reduce the footprint by 3 s.f. Neighbor Comments The City has received ---i comment letter from neighboring property owners to the immediate east at 3468 Lyric Avenue, expressing concerns regarding drainage, construction impacts, and the character of the neighborhood. See Exhibit J. The neighbors request that the new home be no closer to their property than the existing residence which is approximately 12' from the side lot line. The new home is proposed at VY from the line. The neighbors' home is approximately 8 feet from the lot line. Note that although the site hardcover is being reduced from the existing level, drainage arrows shown on the survey direct drainage straight at the neighboring property instead of toward the street. This needs to be resolved prior to building permit issuance. FILE #17-3906 February 21, 2017 Page 6 of 6 issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. If the Planning Commission concludes that the variances as requested are justified, does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate any impacts created by the granting of the variances? 4. Does Planning Commission find justification for granting of the 3 s.f. structural coverage variance, or should the footprint be further reduced? S. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances. Staff cannot recommend approval of a variance for structural lot coverage, despite the fact that it is minimal. If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met for the area and width variances, then a recommendation for approval would be in order, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall adhere to the 35% hardcover and 1500 s.f. structural lot coverage limitations. 2. Applicant shall submit and adhere to a grading plan to be approved by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance, showing that drainage from the new residence will have no additional drainage impacts on the neighboring property, and if possible reduce the existing impacts. While this is a standard building permit condition, it is called out here due to expressed neighbor concerns. City of Orono Variance Application PC Exhibit A StreetAddress: Application # 2750 Kelley Parkway 17 -9'Ab Orono, MN 55356 Date Received: Main: 952-249-4600 Staff fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: Fee: $700 P.O. Box 66 Escrow: $700 / $2,500 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Notes: S H Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: 3472 Lyric Ave Orono, MN 55391 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: to move from a non-comforming lot to a Ter -3 lot as to build a new house. (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 131 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Joshua/Markum Ruilders. Inc - Phone (Primary): 612-998-7818 Mailing Address: 7867 Eastwood Road City: Mou—nds View ZIP: 55112 Email: mark(cb-moshuamarkum.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Q check here if Property Owner is same as applicant El check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email: same as above APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. 0 Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: Variance Application - January 2017 Page 4 Date: I Date: Date: RECEIVED Date: AN 1 17 # -39 06 CITY OF ORONO CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for- Joshua/Markum Builders, Inc. -of- 3472 Lyric Avenue Orono, MN — — -�7- FND. ',/2'* OPEN — LEGEND 7 '11. �M DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNJ 00 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Existing DENOTES GAS METER Gorage DENOTES HYDRANT 9-> F-71 DENOTES MAcLBOX 0 0 0 7L DENOTES POWER POLE FND. IP— 8 ..—FNC. 1/2" 6FEN G DENOTES SAN17ARY SEWER MANHOLE 44 U- 77 WO R E" D4 DENOTES WATER VALVE 6�e WA 0 Fence�-..Fes 1 'c,4Existlng Gora . t E. of k5.t line 0-0— DENOTES WOVEN W:RE FENCE i(588 sq. ft) N Cq o—o— DENOTES WOOD FENCE DENOTES RE7&NING WALL 3.3 24-3/ L? DENOTES EX!STiNG CONTOURS DENOTES EXIS--ING SANITARY SEWER OT L oHw— DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE T) 5,wm.. DENOTES BITUVINOUS SURFACE 11 /2515 12.3 F� DENO—ES CONCRETE SURF -ACE �FFE=951.5 E DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE 0 t- LZI L-1 E "Existing Housern ca z /(962 sq. ft) J-71 I<r 0 u Exist'ng House N�. c� FFE=98.3. Existing Hojj� e V, Bound ea % 0 =6,721 S FT. k\,t J FFE GAR=985.01- I Co J 0-FFE3-3 2�5 -a 9 Q Fr_ ....... ...... Cli .......... .......... ........................ *�j.94 . ....... .... 201.23 ....... Go 1/2" OPEN ....... — �0.3r,�)- 0 983.40 .4 -,\,H.xyz FN D. 1/2- OPEN S8904 ICY N qb Co Q L G) 0/.. 1 -/Y -r -AV <-< HA I?D C 0 VEI? A REA S. - (See Hardcover Calculation Worksheet) B -E A C J RECEIVED i JAN 2 6 2017 PC EXhibit a CITY OF ORONO NORTH NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sors, !nc. on 01/23/17, Bearings shown are bcsed on the Hennepin County Coordincte System NAID 83 (96 adj.). Vert�cal Dcll-,� rm NAVD29 This survey was prepared without the benef�t of titie work. Add'tional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances mcy exist other than those showr hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current Utle commitment or an attorney's title opinion. — Due to fle�d work being completed during the winte, season t�ere may be improvernerts in cdclition to those shown that were not visible d�;e to snow and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. —>—>-----@972.49 I-FND. '/2" OPEN' 49. B2 FND. IRONJ W/UNREADABLE CAP # 3906 Run a soNs- iNp.- Professional Land Surveyors www,.ogrud.com 990 5th Avenue SE Suite 2 Hutchinson, MN 53350 Tel. (320) 687-2025 Fax (320) 587-2595 Lot 18, Block 5, NAVARRE HEIGHTS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 0 Denotes Iron Set Bearings shown are Hennepin 1 -hereby certify thct this plar, survey o!- !-eport was prepared by me or under my 0 1� L�enotes Iron Found County Coordinate System (96 adj.' airec-, supervision and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the �aw s ) Sca�e 1"= 30' Drawn By: SNN of the State f n ota. Dated this 26th day of JanuQry 2017, JoL) No.: 17040HS Pmject Manager: KDN License No. 45356 I-FND. '/2" OPEN' 49. B2 FND. IRONJ W/UNREADABLE CAP # 3906 Run a soNs- iNp.- Professional Land Surveyors www,.ogrud.com 990 5th Avenue SE Suite 2 Hutchinson, MN 53350 Tel. (320) 687-2025 Fax (320) 587-2595 tl- 0 z JLO— 0:. 0-0 CA &22 DOM Z CA 0) 0 Lim 23 (5 E cc C Cc >% 0 -J law Cq 0 Re n z bu 0 0 D 37,jv 4 45.2 -------------- (U 'u, LQ 0 F- Qc 'D C) > Q� C) 0. (D A 3-H qR 00,01 ;�;Wwo �5 C� u 00 c o 0. 't C� ..Ico All" End SLM:-V2Z1- L LL L:Gld 3AV 01�Ul 29 -VC 3snOH ONliSIX3\ ---------------------------- 45.2 ------------ WrHO a, DO (d)!g'-pe T T -.( flL-V.'--P-G .. T ..... ......... A" T.V'9 T-O'V d �7�' 00,2Z 0 i C� - i k 'ML t LLJ a; C� i 2' [Z z LLJ < \r X L) it 0 LLJ 0- Cf) 0 cr- 0 (A LLJ 0 0 a- < 0 Q:� < L.L k-.) 09 zz - - -. M ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —Z26 ............. A-lvm Q]lsocjo(,dcj COP >- 0 x 662 C() 0 C-4 ol ji! CD PCExhibitC I 0 (n 0 0 cLfL), < CFLn > 0 0 & 45.2 -------------- (U 'u, LQ 0 F- Qc 'D C) > Q� C) 0. (D A 3-H qR 00,01 ;�;Wwo �5 C� u 00 c o 0. 't C� ..Ico All" End SLM:-V2Z1- L LL L:Gld 3AV 01�Ul 29 -VC 3snOH ONliSIX3\ ---------------------------- 45.2 ------------ WrHO a, DO (d)!g'-pe T T -.( flL-V.'--P-G .. T ..... ......... A" T.V'9 T-O'V d �7�' 00,2Z 0 i C� - i k 'ML t LLJ a; C� i 2' [Z z LLJ < \r X L) it 0 LLJ 0- Cf) 0 cr- 0 (A LLJ 0 0 a- < 0 Q:� < L.L k-.) 09 zz - - -. M ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —Z26 ............. A-lvm Q]lsocjo(,dcj COP >- 0 x 662 C() 0 C-4 ol ji! CD PCExhibitC I 0 (n 0 z C) CL (D E co (D = L- U) Q) a) noE C) Z 4- 0 (D 0 -0 > = Q) F L u) E D > 0 0 -C a) L.L -0 > U cn A. _0 loo� CD 0 LL - 0 .......... .............. ....................... 0 0 Ld 3: w W ........................... < LInj 0 ............ 0 >1 U) > __, < ui -226 ..... z — LIJ Ld z 0 W =3 Do < 0-0 -i z -*� Ld U) 0 > < j < z L _0 < W o m 0 Ld w -j M > w C) C) < 3: 0 Q) co E F-- 0 u :� Lo CL >- 0 Z Ld [n C) > -:t Z CD uj m C� z z X cr 0 < u C) 0 0 < 0 f)f < 0� z z Z Ln z w z Z Ld _j U Of M Ld t w uj 0 0 af Of > V) U, > 0 UO 0 Lo w -i LLJ D z < -3� 0 R < P 0 Z< < 0 0 LLJ of x > CC, 0 of :F LLJ C) -3 V) 7- a_ cn x 0- ui 0 E -n C) CD U) ul Ln U) U) LO U) U) (A (n ..................................... 4� V) U, En cn Ld bi Ld w V) (n (n (n V) Ln Ld LL� LU Ld Ld w bi w bi La U-1 LU bi bi bi ............. C: C) 0 0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 GO 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z Z Z Ld Lj LLJ LLI LLJ LLJ wi LLJ U-1 LLJ LLJ LLI LJ LL -1 LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLI C) 0 -F- 0 0 0 0 C) LO 0 0 LLJ �C:) 0 L- U) > U) 0 ro 451 -5 F -I < LID Co L- 0 0 C-) x 9 -0 4- C"i co A 0 Z _j 0 0 L—JL-j (D C cD , a) P7 - Q) L- C) -r- C) a) (D V) 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - u Li �o EL cn 0 0 Ln t 0 U) c -j 0 CD cLfL), < CFLn > 0 0 & 0 0 Cue) :js 4)1 am Lo -5 u DO a LLJ .67 0> T EL ccb x � 0 0 m Of E 1.1±% I 1 C; 2 U� C5 " a_ C) [ ------- 3o.o --------------- 44 0 z C) CL (D E co (D = L- U) Q) a) noE C) Z 4- 0 (D 0 -0 > = Q) F L u) E D > 0 0 -C a) L.L -0 > U cn A. _0 loo� CD 0 LL - 0 .......... .............. ....................... 0 0 Ld 3: w W ........................... < LInj 0 ............ 0 >1 U) > __, < ui -226 ..... z — LIJ Ld z 0 W =3 Do < 0-0 -i z -*� Ld U) 0 > < j < z L _0 < W o m 0 Ld w -j M > w C) C) < 3: 0 Q) co E F-- 0 u :� Lo CL >- 0 Z Ld [n C) > -:t Z CD uj m C� z z X cr 0 < u C) 0 0 < 0 f)f < 0� z z Z Ln z w z Z Ld _j U Of M Ld t w uj 0 0 af Of > V) U, > 0 UO 0 Lo w -i LLJ D z < -3� 0 R < P 0 Z< < 0 0 LLJ of x > CC, 0 of :F LLJ C) -3 V) 7- a_ cn x 0- ui 0 E -n C) CD U) ul Ln U) U) LO U) U) (A (n ..................................... 4� V) U, En cn Ld bi Ld w V) (n (n (n V) Ln Ld LL� LU Ld Ld w bi w bi La U-1 LU bi bi bi ............. C: C) 0 0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 GO 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z Z Z Ld Lj LLJ LLI LLJ LLJ wi LLJ U-1 LLJ LLJ LLI LJ LL -1 LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLI C) 0 -F- 0 0 0 0 C) LO 0 0 LLJ �C:) 0 L- U) > U) 0 ro 451 -5 F -I < LID Co L- 0 0 C-) x 9 -0 4- C"i co A 0 Z _j 0 0 L—JL-j (D C cD , a) P7 - Q) L- C) -r- C) a) (D V) 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - u Li �o EL cn 0 0 Ln t 0 U) c -j 0 z 0 CFLn > 0 0 04 .2— 4 0 0 Cue) :js 4)1 am Lo -5 u 0 cc M Rem a) s . EL ccb x � 0 z C) CL (D E co (D = L- U) Q) a) noE C) Z 4- 0 (D 0 -0 > = Q) F L u) E D > 0 0 -C a) L.L -0 > U cn A. _0 loo� CD 0 LL - 0 .......... .............. ....................... 0 0 Ld 3: w W ........................... < LInj 0 ............ 0 >1 U) > __, < ui -226 ..... z — LIJ Ld z 0 W =3 Do < 0-0 -i z -*� Ld U) 0 > < j < z L _0 < W o m 0 Ld w -j M > w C) C) < 3: 0 Q) co E F-- 0 u :� Lo CL >- 0 Z Ld [n C) > -:t Z CD uj m C� z z X cr 0 < u C) 0 0 < 0 f)f < 0� z z Z Ln z w z Z Ld _j U Of M Ld t w uj 0 0 af Of > V) U, > 0 UO 0 Lo w -i LLJ D z < -3� 0 R < P 0 Z< < 0 0 LLJ of x > CC, 0 of :F LLJ C) -3 V) 7- a_ cn x 0- ui 0 E -n C) CD U) ul Ln U) U) LO U) U) (A (n ..................................... 4� V) U, En cn Ld bi Ld w V) (n (n (n V) Ln Ld LL� LU Ld Ld w bi w bi La U-1 LU bi bi bi ............. C: C) 0 0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 GO 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z 2: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z Z Z Ld Lj LLJ LLI LLJ LLJ wi LLJ U-1 LLJ LLJ LLI LJ LL -1 LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLJ LLI C) 0 -F- 0 0 0 0 C) LO 0 0 LLJ �C:) 0 L- U) > U) 0 ro 451 -5 F -I < LID Co L- 0 0 C-) x 9 -0 4- C"i co A 0 Z _j 0 0 L—JL-j (D C cD , a) P7 - Q) L- C) -r- C) a) (D V) 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - u Li �o EL cn 0 0 Ln t 0 U) c -j 3 I CD - 0 OOP 0 CD [3472 Lyric Ave. Orono,'MN 55� %0 C) cr, 0 M < z m 0 a PC Exhibit D 0 -Z� 0 POW WE immom BnN3AV GMAI Zin 12 -AnN3Av 3WOH 31HAI Uve w 02 LU LLI o -.W - ww C', 0 0 co 0 w w o m - - >w !w -f2 w< L.L Ora oz olm -,ZQj.o Lu MD 'w- zo co' L 0 � no rL, 5 OLML",Wwo 0 ZWE o", 20- 010IX8 IM - E -. -P I -. -. 6 1 Z, 1 g.: -W � o'. - -� Z -M 8 0 � 8 o 2 , 'M'S: ;,Z6 � L -L, 9 0 Vloxzz"V,W.M �-Ww ow9wzmwzmo- L;wlLw zno A a > LL w a- 0 03 Ul 6&&<Mmzw LC 0 L6 0 CLELO um §0 s Z�o Q� w =0 mw CL In dL M�WZO � 4 -,, o 4 L6 C, �>- .6 0 9 w Cd L) 0 �4,4 Lu w w m 9 n, :77 p - R9 2 0 0 0 0 0 DINING ROOM WOOD 13'XI2' ii: -LOFL-IT IFJTCHEN :? WOOD 13'X16' 9 Eo HVAC/ PLUMBING 2 -CAR GARAnp FAMILY ROOM WOOD 16'X18'4" COVERED PoRcii CONCRETE PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN N.T.S� 1006 FINISHED SO. Fr. FTFIN DESIG1% COPMGlfr 2016 i� 3050 ARPET 1SX15. I �� �02 10 0 .0 r ns; OWNERS BATH TILE CLOSET HALL ME BONUSROOM CARPET 17'Xl O'B" %0 a) 0% N.T.S. HALLWAY CARPEr SECOND FLOOR PLAN I 71 BEDROOMM CARPET 11)(11, a /(l)ROD BEDROOM 02 CARPET 11'6'XliY7" CLOSET (1)SELF/(l)ROD SH 3DSD X-6" FX 2640 1312 FINISHED SQ. Fr. SUDER BD36 BEDROOMM CARPET IZIVX14� ENTERTAINMENT ROOM WOOD 14'YvX21'4" m MECHANICALI STORAGE - - - lam CONCRETE 0 F. D %0 0 0 n — 0 o m o , a ---i r-,'� ��OPOSE�DFINI�SHED�BASEM�ENTP�LA�..... lia millm, �: 1! 4.1i NVV UN0180 3nN3AV XUA-1 UVE 5 al 31NOH �InN3AV 01HAl Uve Hl 11 it; mm< 0 I W 13 z 0 16 W CL z J3 a w x , LL, F- W LU ,, N 'LL, a. Lu m ZO Z W P Z W 0- j 0 M 0 1 1- R 8 16 lz :W3 L) z 75 "U OR 00 zoo W 0 M 'o wo:5 C, Z >- W O� F- F- X Z , . . W. ZW W < M F- 2 W Z --z ,'e oz 0- J, (Z) P: 0 LU N ME (Z" FZ3 'a,): MEOW (o .) zw 0 0 0 LaLl W 0 F- 2 W Z ZTaOW -- LL _ - 10 po: z cl F- Lu 5 W W LLi 0 F 0 1 0 Ld W 0 CIO 0 Lou Lu C, W ILL z z W W z 0 x uj P-,6 u) F- LLI 80 < -1 > W m 0: EL a W 0 W -J 0 F- Ind I _j rL W -j 0: 0 a -j Fa W U) m -3 LLI z a 5wM Z 0 LLI -j -j LLI W ', 7, JU LL < CO IL :5 Q < w 0 0- . 5 0 LOL � R-. 0) < W co lij 0 (9 (o F- m LLI 0 v CL N 6 a 46 a P-: 13= �- Lz) o06 (j) ci (L CO CL IF ----------- - - I- W 13 z 0 16 W CL z J3 a w x , LL, F- W LU ,, N 'LL, a. Lu m ZO Z W P Z W 0- j 0 M 0 1 1- R 8 16 lz :W3 L) z 75 "U OR 00 zoo W 0 M 'o wo:5 C, Z >- W O� F- F- X Z , . . W. ZW W < M F- 2 W Z --z ,'e oz 0- J, (Z) P: 0 LU N ME (Z" FZ3 'a,): MEOW (o .) zw 0 0 0 LaLl W 0 F- 2 W Z ZTaOW -- LL _ - 10 po: z cl F- Lu 5 W W LLi 0 F 0 1 0 Ld W 0 CIO 0 Lou Lu C, W ILL z z W W z 0 x uj P-,6 u) F- LLI 80 < -1 > W m 0: EL a W 0 W -J 0 F- Ind I _j rL W -j 0: 0 a -j Fa W U) m -3 LLI z a 5wM Z 0 LLI -j -j LLI W ', 7, JU LL < CO IL :5 Q < w 0 0- . 5 0 LOL � R-. 0) < W co lij 0 (9 (o F- m LLI 0 v CL N 6 a 46 a P-: 13= �- Lz) o06 (j) ci (L CO CL z N11 ON11110 3fiNgAv DIUAI W?c EIV90H iinNaAV DIUALI ZBPE 131 LO Lu Lu z z L1, no M. 0 V2 0 0 NO .5,W�6 0- 2 9 w a. LL, 5: X, 0 w Lu P 0 (9 0 �- I m N ZZW6 L, LU -j Lu -j R W-imLU-i z < 0 x < LU LU z (9 Z) z 4;,i 00 8 Ili 11 - 0� w w w '0 w ca ZO LO 0 - CO 0 W Ui Z m C9 U. z 0 goo zi8--§R=-,WZO1Q W �- W g w —0 CL O-Lij o fn LL, -j z LL 2: F- z 00=3:lowm a a - LU a w LU d . 0 -J�Dod-- 9 fr 9 '0 -< LU a LU (z OZF-< ox W8(LM (10, 8 -i I =1 0 Ld IF- I-- (n 2 (6 < U) m co 0 3nN3AV 31WO We 3woH 3nN3AV MAI Wre 0 . C.0 gu: w u LIU Ww ai LL, w j - w do<-ZJ MEMALL"O cc w La z 6 ;Lu� � S It"i ZRM905PD�Qwo �60wj.-,Ooomoao�ooz000f ��-.Wo 0 L, LL- Z W-Olwl lf28-JPWLU2= 0 F- Z F- W w 0-12�0 00§6c) 00.�.j8WFZF-Azor-FQ:z w F- ZLZW-,-Jw-j F::W�C-4wozcc2 � CL.6 F, U) 2 Lu -1 w 0 -j o I LL, C5 (D W -Juog <MD,Z co -i < 0 z W 0 -j LLI< Z .06,� z 0 z LLI 0 IL LQ r3 'o LL _: U- D N a D "r m 0 M LL C6 L) to ca PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM PC Exhibit E This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. I Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NIA in the space provided. 1. "The property owner proposes to use theproperty in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." Yes, tb tear down a small house and replace with a new constrution house. 2. "The pli ht of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." Yes, Ige lot is listed as non-comforming not Ter -3 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." Correct, the new home will be similar to the one built at 3438 Lyric Ave 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." The house on the property right now would needs to be torn down due to the condition of the property. 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's [and is located." RECEIVED Variance Application — January 2017 Page 7 JAN 18 ?017 # 3906 CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." correct, the house will be similar to that of 3438 Lyric Ave 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." they do apply 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Correct 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." Correct 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Correct Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary) - The lot is a non-comforming lot and i would like to have set as a Ter -3 i would meet all the set backs and it would fit the lot and the location very well. I feel this new home would improve the neighborhood. RECEIVED Variance Application — January 2017 Page 8 JAN 18 ?0 1:' # 3906 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Vork 1�i E, as ic-, u! at o ri 1Y to Sheet PC Exhibit F Property Address: Date* Prepared by: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier I Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER in lhe following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover St3tLIS of the property. For Tier I properties.. identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. 1 Toial Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width I fsquare Feet) S.R A a S.F, S.F. S.F. G S,F. H r SY. K &F. L S.F. S. F. N 0 S. F. i Q S.F. R S, F. t W X Y (1) tal E Excludable Total Excludat Net Existing H Total Lot Area Code Etc 76-1 iine M Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)+(4)] SR S.F. s'F' ,,,tp .&CEIVED This is an information packet regarding Hardcover, Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information herein, however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. FEB 0 12017 Page 8 of 9 CITY OF ORONO S.F. s.R-4 S. F.—Jr S.F, 7r' S.F. S.F. (Proposed Hardcover next page) ,,,tp .&CEIVED This is an information packet regarding Hardcover, Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information herein, however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. FEB 0 12017 Page 8 of 9 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet 0 Property Address: C— kv sea IL&' - Prepared by: . -4 1), Date: OF1519 17 f4k 4? t., --Wm 5 764 %or. C&rx, air 1-7o&j0ts T,.UA /;&Opj Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier I Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Stop 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total 11cluare Feet) (Example) (Garsae) (24'x 30') _C (720 S.F.) A H All!�& F 4- reA,*-4% SY, 8 F-;-1L6S% W lf-&"Zac�uj ST. C 00? S7 � S. -L K NIZI S.F. D —sim—&IJAL.K. --- S.F. E DJ&%VC%j&V S.F. F AkIre pikin, -_q % Li S.F, G Ft4LF-PL&!A SA 1-T S.F. H C. Y., If,% 16 S.F. S.F. S.F. K S.F. L M S.F. S.F. N S.F. S.F. P T— S.F. S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V W_______IF S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. z S.F. Total Proposed Hardcover 2, - -16. S- S.F. 1--- Excludable Hardcover (See C Code SM 78-1684): - S. F. _(2 ) Total Excludable Hardcover S. F. �Net Proposed Hardcover rSubtract line (2) from line (1)) (4) Total Lot Area -17- 1 S. F. i Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) (4) 3 T —'s/. This /a an information packet regarding Hardcover, Evely effort has been made to insure tt?&- accuracy uf the Wurmation contained herein, however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 CERTIFICUE OF SURVO - PROPOSED .. . ......... 1-1 .................. lor- JoshualMarlkum Builders, Inc. . .. . . ................. .0 ;) -of- 3472 Lyric Avenue, Orono, MN —a— a 7 PROPOSED 0 HARDCOVERAREAS: LOT 1 18 IN (See Hardcovw CalmilaCion Worksheet) 1 79.94 A! 0 , 2-- I 14ORTH ev" I 0 —2--, _30_?�.33 H A BoundaUAxea 6,721 SO. FT. I A Z -2i ZZ .............. 98 1 Buyz D Deck Egress Window 14.00 LEGEND A 0 OAK 33 - 16.00 IM0 0 4 Bel . 59 -930.51 IM DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UN17 11 - I DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION C4 -7777-1 1. M DENOTES GAS -ME-MR V DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES MAILBOX CANT�LEVVER--__ DENOTES POWER POLE Ito t'or COAANe� 0 DENOTES SA NITARY SEWER MANHOLE M DENOTES WATER VALVE PROPOSED 0-0— DENOTES WOVEN WIRE FENCE HOUSE 0-13- DENOTES WOOD FENCE C=C%MKDC)Cx:> - DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES EXISTING C014TOURS r DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS 0 DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWMEER CD M . �40 DENOTES OVERHEAD WARE :I: cli /5,0 —DHW— DENOTES BUILDING SET13ACK LINE L K_'1_ — ---------- DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE D M _q: 44 214 T DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE to LLI ro OL DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE :% DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE 0 N f r EXIST'ING HOUSE LLJ 3484 LYRIC AVE (n PID: 1711723430157 PROP 0 al Y i GARACE 0- 1 a- O—n-0 _Z. 20.00 PRO�POSED DRIVEWAY -992.83 .. .......... P a ..... ....... . ................. .................. —7-710 —V — 50.30 0 n"yz scale 1 "= 10' 1 Drawn 13y: SNN Project Manager: KDN Job No.-- 17040HS 0 Denotes I )enotes Iron Found Pearings shown ore Hennepin County Coordinate System (96 adf, I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under MY a- one NNE, IM direct supervision and that I am a duly Reg[stered Land Surveyor under the $a IL of the State of M! t I Dated this 13th day of February , 201T \-P 1w Professional Land Surmyors �Ag A�w 990 5th Avenue SE SUM 2 Hutchinson, MN RE License No. 45356 TW.(W9ff-2M F=p2o)su-2= I p @A Or X w cr be LU z z *mi I 74fi 'o 4k 40 ik E3 IQD 5 PC Exhibit G if 41 ccff 'VP toot - - - - - - - - - - ui ML uj z 07 om CA tD oill I m df PIT Fr SAL IN w 'eh Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Pfovided By. Resident and Reai Estate Servicas Date: 1/2412017 (4R 41) K 01 ro 0" PC Fx1h, (144) (127) L I -jA �1 L I-V i I -q, 5t 0-117.2-3-43 1 CIA JIM un OR 12 tit N Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: JOSHUAIMARKUM BUILDERS INC 3472 LyNc Avenue Orono, MN 55391 RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2017 C,[TY OF ORONO 0 60 120 240 ft For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 Sth Street South Minneapolis, MN 5rA87 gis.info@hennepin.us # 3906 obit H r--7 L I-V i I -q, 5t 0-117.2-3-43 1 CIA JIM un OR 12 tit N Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: JOSHUAIMARKUM BUILDERS INC 3472 LyNc Avenue Orono, MN 55391 RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2017 C,[TY OF ORONO 0 60 120 240 ft For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 Sth Street South Minneapolis, MN 5rA87 gis.info@hennepin.us # 3906 obit H cd3py rum— L40elb A Band along line to i Use AveryO Templatp 516010 Feed Paper --- expose Pop-up Edge— J' N I PC Exhibit 1 38 17-117-23 43 0006 38 17-117-23 43 0019 38 17-117-23 43 0058 KEVIN D DEGROOT PATRICIA & THOMAS KLEFFMAN JEFFREY C & JULIE L KRAHL 3449 CRYSTAL PL 3444 LIVINGSTON AVE 3508 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0007 38 17-117-23 43 0020 38 17-117-23 43 0059 DEREK J LEE SUZANNE CAOLA JANET M ROSHAR 3457 CRYSTAL PL 3438 LIVINGSTON AVE 3500 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 W.-kYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0008 38 17-117-23 43 0021 38 17-117-23 43 0062 SWIFT HOME SOLUTIONS LLC ROXANN M BEISCH DAVID 13ERNARDY & EMILY RUD 9362 TAMARACK VILLAGE 3436 LIVINGSTON AVE 3433 LIVINGSTON AVE SUITE 119-355 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WOODBURY MN 55125 CLEVELAND MN 56017 38 17-117-23 43 0009 38 17-117-23 43 0022 38 17-117-23 43 0063 SUSAN KENNEDI MICHAEL ROSDAHL ROBERT S & JULIE J STECKMAN 3473 CRYSTAL PL BRIDGET P CARLSON 3435 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MIN 55391 3422 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 3475 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0010 38 17-117-23 43 0041 38' 17-117-2343 0064 NICOLE KILBY ROBERT E EBERT DENNIS L HEGER 5235 PHELPS RD 3520 LIVINGSTON AVE 3443 LIVINGSTON AVE MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0011 38 17-117-23 43 0042 38 17-117-23 43 0065 JASIN LARSON � MARK A SPALDING CAROLYN M TILLOTSON 3485 CRYSTAL PI, 26087 ISLAND RD 3445 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 CLEVELAND MN 56017 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0012 39 17-117-23 43 0043 38 17-117-23 43 0068 LACEY M KLUNGSETH DEREK G HAGENESS BRIDGET REIGSTAD 3493 CRYSTAL PL 3505 LIVINGSTON AVE 3475 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 39 17-117-23 43 0016 38 17,117-23 43 0044 38 17-117-23 43 0069 CARLENZENAUER, DUSTIN J MICHEL CECILIA M SCHULTE 3472 LIVINGSTON AVE 3525 LIVINGSTON AVE 3477 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0017 38 17-117-23 43 0045 38 17-117-23 43 0070 GEORGIANA CARTALUCCA STEVEN B & KATHRYN A SANDLER VERA TEETZFL KEVIN BOE 3533 LIVINGSTON AVE PO BOX 216 2642 CEDAR CREST RD W WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 17-117-23 43 001 s 38 17-117-23 43 0057 38 17-117-23 43 0071 LEAH R LUNDEEN JACOB M/EMILY LOURICAS SRARON L HOVLAND 3452 LIVINGSTON AVE 3520 LYRIC AVE 3496 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 35391 ttiquettes faciles A paler A Repliez h la hachure afin de WWW.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYS 516015 Senscle chargement rMler le rebord Pop-up7m 11 -800 -60 -AVERY I I A& Iseno along line to I Use Avery* Templatp 5 160 Feed Paper �' expose Pop-up Edge- AVERY(m mom 38 17-117-23 43 OG74 JOSHUA/MARKUM BUILDERS INC 7B67 EASTWOOD RD MOUNDSVIEW MN 55112 39 17-117-23 43 0075 E L MURRAY & P S ROSS 3468 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 39 17-117-23 43 0076 MR/MRS FRANK L MITTELSTAEDT 3444 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0077 LANDSOURCELLC 550 25TH AVE N ST CLOUD MN 56303 38 17-117-23 43 0078 CITY OF ORONO 2700 KELLEY PKWY LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 17-117-23 43 0079 CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 43 0083 CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 43 0084 CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 43 0085 CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 43 0086 GREGORY T & NANCY J CONLON 3465 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-1]7-23430087 TOM C & JULIE M FLYNN 3473 LYRIC ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0090 JENNA LEIGH OLSEN 3499 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0093 JAMES A BLOCK 3472 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0094 JAMES A BLOCK 3472 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0095 SANDRA HOLMAN 3468 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0098 GERM -TOM PARTNERSHIP C/O COURTLAND RE PO BOX 112 CHASKA MN 55318 38 17-117-23 43 0100 RUBY L LINDBLAD 3505 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0101 PAUL BOWMAN & BARBARA BOWMAN 8272 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 38 17-117-23 43 0102 GREGORY ANDREW HUELER 1406 REST POINT RD MOUND MN 55364 38 17-117-23 43 0113 SHORELINE-NAVARRE LLC C/O LNR PROPERTIES 319 BARRY AVE SSTE 301 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0114 LOWELL R ZITZLOFF 319 BARRY AVE S #301 WAYZATAMN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0139 DAN P & CHERYL G DOSHAN 3488 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 39 17-117-23 43 0141 STEVEN J KING 3473 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23430142 RICHARD W BLOOMQUIST 610 FAIRMOUNT AVE N MONTROSE MN 55363 38 17-117-23 43 0155 SKYT PROPERTIES 3496 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0156 CARL] P SPERBECK. 3477 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0157 JUSTINE A MAETZOLD TRENT K MAETZOLD 3484 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 # 3906 RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2017 CITY OF ORONO Ittiquettes fadlesb Paler A I I Repliez h la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utifisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 Sens d A chargem:nt rdv6ler le rabord Pop-up— 1 -800 -60 -AVERY A A PC Exhibit J Planning Committee letter Feb.12,2017 Dear Members of the Planning Committee: C/7) -or We have enjoyed living in Navarre for sixteen years. We were drawn by the character of the neighborhood, the pro, x1afto the lake and the affordability. Receft property developers are buying lots, tearing down homes and building huge houses on small lots. These houses are far too big for the surrounding homes. We live at 3468 Lyric Avenue and there was a notice sent regarding 3472 Lyric Avenue. The builders are requesting lot area and lot width variances and a structural coverage variance. We request that the new house not be any closer to our house than the existing house. We are concerned about foundation issues from large, heavy equipment, water infiltration, hardcover issues and blocked sunlight on the west side of our home if a two story house is built. Two large oak trees and a large pine tree would need to be cut down. The new blue house next to 3472 has a concrete driveway spanning a three stall garage in addition to a front walkway. The hardcover ratio to grass is not adequate and does not allow for proper drainage since this house sits high and water drains down the hill. A new house at 3472 would also sit high causing drainage problems as it is up the hill from our house. While it appears the City of Orono has their own agenda regarding redevelopment, it is at a great cost to the current neighborhood residents. There are many neighbors who do not want these huge houses built on these small lots. Please consider the residents of the neighborhood; this is where we live unlike the property developers and Planning Committee members. Respectfully, Edward Murray Pamela Ross Page 1 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 12 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 17-3903, Alex Ugorets, 2520 Shadywood Road, Sketch Plan Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The property owner seeks non-binding feedback on a proposed development at 2520 Shadywood Road, south of the Freshwater Business Center. 2. Minnesota Statute 15.99 Deadline. Not applicable 3. Background. For projects that require a Land Use policy change by the City Council (in this case a change to the zoning map), the applicant may prepare a sketch plan, an early draft of the desired end product, for initial feedback from the Planning Commission and City Council. This is completed prior to investing the resources in developing final plans and studies. The Commission and Council do not approve or deny a sketch, they are asked to identify questions, issues or concerns they have based on this preliminary information. The applicant decides whether or not to proceed based on this feedback. The property owner has prepared a sketch plan of a proposed 3-4 story, 49 unit apartment building in the vacant lot south of the Freshwater Business Center; which he also owns. The proposed density is within limits suggested as appropriate in the Comprehensive Plan, and would support lower densities elsewhere in the community. Onsite parking would be provided for 100 cars, 50 underground, and 50 surface. The attached Planning Corarnission staff report (Exhibit C) and packet (incorporated by reference) provide further detail of the project. 4. Planning Commission Comment. The Planning Commission generally supported the proposed project, but had several comments requiring further review: a. Traffic. It was suggested a traffic impact study be prepared as part of the formal application. b. Building Height. It was noted that typically in Orono, building height is limited to three stories, and the proposal is three stories plus a penthouse level. From the rear, the building will appear to be 5 stories, due to the slope of the property c. Fire Code. It was noted that the fire chief will need to verify emergency coverage, due to the size and use of the building. The expectation is that all applicable building and fire codes will be met. d. Density. It was noted that the density is at the upper range offered by the Comprehensive Plan. Further, it was noted that this level of density would help the city achieve Met Council density goals, allowing for lower density elsewhere. 5. Public Comment. The sketch plan process is conducted at public meetings, but is not an advertised public hearing. A public hearing will be required to rezone the property and for the site plan. The applicant has sent preliminary information to the properties most affected. The city has received at least one comment, included as Exhibit D. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends Council provide feedback to the developer. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED No Action requested. Item presented for feedback only. Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R AGENDAITEM Exhibits Exhibit A. Proposed plans and elevations Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. PC Staff Report Exhibit D. PC Minutes - Draft Exhibit E. Comments received References A. Planning Commission packet dated February 21, 2017 Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R (o2007 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 1311 or callffllxom Common Ground Alliance R4 o o o 2 37 &o. �jj I-010" -(Q N 100e 100e 1-001 1000, 1-01 Site Development S EXISTING ZONING— LOT 1 : PROPOSED ZONING— LOT 1: EXISTING PROPERTY AREA— LOT 1: PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA— LOT 1: EXISTING PROPERTY AREA— LOT 2: PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA— LOT 2: �y % 1� 310 o .14 .1 4 Site Legend 0 EXIS-10ING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE % LOT LINE SETBACK LINE WETLAND BUFFER LINE L— — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE Vicinitv Ma PC Exhibit C 17-3903 CURB AND CUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL —X—X— FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ON STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT i mh�**�4 w"w"W" I NO, NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS CK I 9, 01010MMA 2 TRANSFORMER F SITE LIGHTING MAMWWWAMIM' F. TRAFFIC SIGN rw POWER POLE 0 BOLLARD POST B4 — OFFICE/PROFFESIONAL RPUD 114,779 SF (2.63 AC) 135,668 SF (3.11 AC) 221,246 SF (5.08 AC) 200,333 SF (4.60 AC) PERVIOUS SURFACE— LOT 1: 86,680 SF (63.9%) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO)— LOT 1: 48,988 SF (36.1%) BUILDING GROSS SIZE— LOT 1: ±58,170 SF DWELLING UNITS—LOT 1: 45+ 2-4 PENTHOUSE UNITS FLOOR— AREA— RATI O(FAR)— LOT 1: 0.51 BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE: 35'=LOCAL STREETS/SITE LOT LINE PARKING SETBACK: 10'=SIDE AND REAR PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE: 9' WIDE X 20' LONG PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT — CITY OF ORONO MULTIPLE DWELLING: 2 SPACE / DWELLING UNIT MULTIPLE DWELLING(45*2) 90 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 90 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED— LOT 1: 100 SPACES (49 SPACES + 51 UNDERGROUND SPACES) EXISTING PARKING— LOT 2: 103 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED— LOT 2: 105 SPACES 0 1 \ XN, N, CD R1 5.00'\"'� 2�B LLJ Ln PO LLI ND WETLAND Ak I"N oo NNNNN. OVA N\ -Aj_LIN �ETLAND Ei Site Details Site Notes NNN' NNNNNI 1 E3612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) A 4" YELLOW DIAGONAL STRIPE 2 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 8 SAWCUT & MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS (TYP.) 3 PRIVATE ACCESSIBLE DROPPED PEDESTRIAN RAMP 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOGO, STRIPING, & SIGNAGE (TYP.) 5 STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 6 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 7 CONCRETE SIDEWALK Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone (952) 937-5150 Fax (952) 937-5822 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed, Krr / RAH Checke& lar— Drawn: RAH Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCH= under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 01/18/17 Licau, No. F'repared for. Ugorets Properties LLC 410 11th Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Vill 2520 Shadywood Road Orono, Minnesota SITE PLAN L Date: 01/18/17 0' 40' 80' 120' Sheet: 1 OF 2 0010413sp.dwg ABOARD RUN SITEEMINOW PAVEMEN7 UAW DUN RIMINI AMBIENT -- I"lull cum AEG BITTER WHO NORMAL NAM LEE A� RETAINING WA� HADE LOT2 PAWMENT �ONCREM MEWAR 4WAC NAM" DUUA SITUMNOW "MIMI M, IRIM, NUMBER BE PAWING SEA MANPOWER Ar VICE UCHI BANNER I MIMI, IN ROPER IOUE ANN GUAM. Immumm A NBC AM I;.NDMAAWW .1111m, LOr I J 311 AC ANNE AAAW I I/ LAW', I NEI 5 RAMP,,,, Al POPE �A---- NII NcPhEiI \ III CURE & NI (7fPE A UUN, WRITE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP a PAMIR ACCEURECKE CREEPE) POESTRAN RAME UMEAKILE PARKING OW MINING & REPAIR (TRE) ABOARD RUN SITEEMINOW PAVEMEN7 UAW DUN RIMINI AMBIENT PC Exhibit D 17-3903 0 0 m 0 c OWN I!Mim --m—w—ro Env son a A no I! Migns 'Tom"" FT wool: !Ell NO IN ME i U U MINE 11 F'j W 11 w -- I I 'MM Wi ON ilia. I M !� ZOE, " `oil OUR, gill F !laIN w I mill, M. M.0 RiArIn 'I awal Omni W Wool ,000" .41 'IMITW _.t .�Y A4 AS JP he;,��f 'A ARM 4* k7 44 I A 2. of k %41 IL AI 1411W N MLIL t, jN AA ILA'* 11, A16 eo4000, z C) LLI cy) C) C) LU Ln 1111111q:111111 Nk A X1 -T 7 '4 �7 'f7 'Irk %khL Westwoo Multi -Disciplined Surveying & Engineering westwoodps.com 77 7 Lr u 0 WK u tw a Iff m HA HEM a 0 FIF IW - 404W --ALO� 6 M J6' " T Z" J� 41t sL Ai ob MIN r 4'1* Most L A& dA6 _-MAI 40� - p1l, V17 -lip _?44W_ 41 kv.. 1p Aw - ;kI "A 7 , V It 13 kit.4 44 . ir"A le 'FOP XWW4 Ai MJ; JA L-4 jo, A400 .01 imp 'LA I 'IA t Ar 1�7 WO Al -11 At 2, W- ,,Jr.� - 4�1 Alt , 42Z 4 MRIZ21 PV AW A% W. lqmb6 Al ell Aw, owl tk, 4j' WWI! 4bis It 'Irt 'Ao 4;7, AF I ps 1** 14� I Ask, fA lb M6 ___ - ' - � I- I .,* � - % I �7_ Z11 nt 7w 46 1** 14� I Ask, fA lb M6 Council Exhibit B 17-3903 PROJECT NARRATIVE FRESHWATER APARTMENTS The Freshwater Apartments will be a valued residential option for the City and Navarre. Alex Ugorets, the owner of the property, is proposing a 45-55 unit apartment building to coincide with the building improvements he is undertaking at the existing Freshwater Building. Both projects will enhance the work/live environment that is desired in this area. Prior to our application we have met with city staff, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The city letter we received on November 10th noted the following items to address: Land Use. The site is zoned B-4, but the Comprehensive Plan anticipates development of the site to include a mix of uses, including condominiums and apartments. We are i n conformance to this vision. Density.. The proposal may exceed the 4-15 unit per acre assigned to this site. Weareexpecting to adjust the lot lines to accommodate setbacks for the office building and apartment. With the lot line adjustment the density calculation could be met. Traffic Study. The city may require a traffic study. If req u i red, we wi I I p rovi d e a st udy. See a Iso our meeting details with Hennepin County on access. Access. The new entrance should be aligned with the new development across the street. We had a joint meeting with City staff and the County to review the access points. At that meeting, the proposed access location was supported by the County as they identified benefits of the project as it relates to future road improvements. We removed a proposed second access as part of this discussion. Parking. Covered parking for one car should be provided. We are providing underground parking to accommodate this request and will have sufficient on-site parking to meet code. The site plan identifies 51 stalls below ground and 49 surface parking stalls. We also have the ability to create a joint parking arrangement with the office building if necessary. Building_HgIght. Historically, the City Council was cautious of buildings over 2 -stories when adjacent residents and the take. We are proposing a 3 -story building fronting County Rd 19 with penthouse units on top along the northeast corner of the building. The building height will be 31 feet facing CR 19 and then steps up to 42 feet with the penthouse units at the back of the building. Because of the topography and underground parking, the building will have a maximum height of 54 feet facing the wetland (east). The architectural renderings we are showing are conceptual to demonstrate the architectural style we wish to provide but may be altered as we move forward with the project. RECEIVED # 3903 JAN 18 2017 CITY OF ORONO The building location also supports the building height. We positioned the building to take advantage of the topography of the site and to minimize any visual impact along County Rd 19. The site slopes away from the road and toward the wetland to the south and east. By using this topography we are able to angle the building away from the street with only having a corner of the building at the front setback. The rest of the building will fall away from the street thus keeping an open view along the road corridor. The topography also allows us to step the building down to 3 stories in front and a partial fourth floor to the back. The penthouse apartments will be set back away from the front building line and placed in the northeast side of the building. In this location the penthouses are away from public view and transitions in height from the existing Freshwater Office building to the north and the residential homes to the south. The site is separated from the residents to the south by 590 and 380 feet respectively with a band of existing mature trees. Lake views of the building will be minimal since the building is on a non -usable part of the lake with few homes. The proposed 54 -foot building height matches the height of the Freshwater building when viewing from the east. The 42 -foot height also matches the height of the Freshwater building southwest corner along County Road 19. Wetland. The wetland is a "Preserve" wetland and will require a 75 -foot bufferfrom the MCWD with an additional 10 -foot city required setbackfrom the buffer. The wetland has been delineated and we have identified the 75 -foot buffer line on our plan. In speaking with the Watershed they noted that the buffer size can be averaged to accommodate the building and that replacement buffers may be allowed on the office site to the north in order to provide buffering along the wetland edge where none exist today. We are improving the quality of the lake by incorporating buffers and ponds for stormwater treatment plus improving existing conditions to the Freshwater office site. We will continue to work with the Watershed and the city to provide an acceptable buffer. (See attached meeting summary) From the above meetings and the comments that we received we prepared a site plan and building elevations that we believe supports the direction given to us and continues to be a viable project. The plan respects the views of the neighboring homes and the views along County Rd 19. It is designed to transition from the 52,000 sq. ft. Freshwater Office building to the north and the homes to the south. We have not conducted soil borings specifically to this site but Mr. Ugorets has conducted soil borings for his parking lot improvements on the Freshwater Office building. The borings closest to the proposed apartment building did not encounter ground water in the 14 -foot deep boring. The wetland delineation reports also did not encounter ground water. Based on this information we are not expecting to encounter groundwater during construction or have it impact the project. We will conduct further borings as we move forward with the project. ,F-iVED JAN 18 2017 # 3903 CITY OF ORONO We are very excited to bring an attractive residential option to the residents of Orono and Navarre. We believe this project will match well with a life style that is desired in this area and around the lake. This project, along with the improvements to the Freshwater Office building, will provide new business and living opportunities to this area that meets local demands and regional goals. We look forward to be part of this community and welcome your comments of our conceptual plan. RECEIVED JAN 18 2017 # 3903 CITY OF ORONO Date Application Received: January 18, 2017 Date Application Considered as Complete: January 18, 2017 60 -Day Review Period Expires: March 18, 2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: February 21, 2017 Subject: #17-3903, Alex Ugorets, 2520 Shadywood Road, Sketch Plan Council Exhibit C 17-3903 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting comments via the sketch plan process for a proposed apartment building on vacant 3.11 acres to the south of the Freshwater Business Center. The apartment building would include 49 units and 51 underground parking stalls. A zone change will be required. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission is asked to give feedback on the proposed development, which appears to require a zone change, and a variance from the structural coverage requirement. Background The property is currently zoned B-4 Office Professional, but is guided for mixed use with a prescribed density of 6-15 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan suggests mixed use to include senior assisted living, townhomes, condominiums, or apartment buildings. From a use standpoint, the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The project as proposed will require a Zone Change. The density as proposed is 15.75 units per gross acre, just above the upper range prescribed by the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal also suggests modifying a portion of the shared property line between the proposed apartment lot and the lot housing the Freshwater Business Center. The modification will be more evident in the rear of the lot, away from the street, toward the lake/ wetland. This modification may impact the lot sizes, and by extension, the density calculation. Access. Access to the site is proposed off of a new shared drive with the Freshwater Business Center. This driveway will line up with the driveway service the church across Shadywood. Ultimately, the plan to coordinate access locations was to have this shared driveway line up with the new Shadywood Circle, as part of the Shadywood Villas project. Ultimately, as part of an expansion, planners hope to shift the church access to Shadywood Circle. The County supports the offset; the turning movements do not conflict. However, staff supports the coordination of the drives, for the long term health of traffic in the area. Parking, The proposal provides 100 parking spaces, a ratio of 2.04 spaces per unit. 51 of those spaces are covered, under the building, and 49 surface spaces are proposed. Two parking FILE # 17-3903 February 21, 2017 Page 2 of 2 spaces per unit is required by city code. The parking requirements are met. Building, The building is intended as a 47-49 unit, market rate apartment building. The narrative suggests the building height will be between 31 and 54 feet. Elevation drawings have not been provided to accurately analyze the height. The building will appear as a three story, flat roofed building plus a penthouse from the parking lot and Shadywood Road. From the wetland, the building will appear to be 4 stories and a penthouse. Historically, the City has shied away from projects higher than 3 stories. The Commission is asked to provide feedback of the height. The building is proposed to be 35 feet back from the Shadywood Road Right of way line and about 35 feet from the new side lot line to the north. The building will be 75 feet from the wetland. Each unit will have a balcony. The building as shown includes brick, steel, and glass with stucco accents. Care will need to be taken to ensure mechanical units are shielded from public view. Grading, The site slopes toward the east/ southeast, away from the street, dropping 12 feet in the first 119 feet. It appears that a substantial amount of fill will need to be brought in to accommodate the project. Further, the lot is wooded, the grading for the building, parking lot, and stormwater management will require the removal of most of the trees outside of the wetland. Utilities. The project will be served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. Stormwater will need to be retained and treated as required by applicable stormwater regulation. Conceptual ponds are pictured. Conservation design. A Conservation design plan will need to be completed as required by city ordinance. Hardcover/ structural coverage. The proposal includes 48,988 sq ft (36.1%) of hard cover where 35% is the maximum permitted. The lot boundaries can be adjusted to avoid the need for a hardcover variance. A rough calculation of the structural converge shows 16,720 sq ft of structural coverage, or 12% of the lot area. There is no structural coverage maximum as the property is over 2 acres. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find any other issues or concerns with this application? List of Exhibits Exhibit A Application Exhibit B Narrative Exhibit C Site Plan Exhibit D Building renderings Exhibit E Landscape Plan Exhibit F Height Context Drawings Council MINUTES OF THE Exhibit D ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION 17-3903 Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 8. #17-3903 UGORETS 8098 LLC, 2520 SHADYWOOD ROAD, CONCEPT PLAN, 7:52 P.M. — 8:40 P.M. Tom Goodrum, on behalf of Ugorets 8098, LLC, was present. Barnhart noted this is a sketch plan review request for a 49 -unit apartment building located at 2520. This request would require a zone change. The access will be off of Shadywood Road via a shared drive with the Freshwater Business Center. This driveway will line up with the driveway servicing the church across Shadywood. Ultimately the plan is to have the shared driveway line up with the new Shadywood Circle access as part of the Shadywood Villas project and will likely remain as a right -in and right -out driveway. Hennepin County supports the proposed access. The proposal provides for 100 parking spaces, which is more than two parking spaces per unit. Fifty-one of those spaces will be located under the building and 49 surface spaces are proposed. Two parking spaces per unit are required by City Code. Staff expects the hardcover on the site to meet the requirements since the lot lines can be reconfigured to adjust the hardcover. One of the issues for discussion tonight is the height of the structure. The height of the proposed building will be between 31 and 54 feet. At this time elevation drawings have not been provided to accurately analyze the height. The building from the front will appear as a three-story, flat -roofed building plus a penthouse over a portion of the building. From the wetland, the building will appear to be four stories in addition to the penthouse. Barnhart noted in the past the City has stayed away from projects higher than three stories but Orono Woods does have a portion of building that is three stories. The building is proposed to be 35 feet back from the Shadywood Road right-of-way line and is about 35 feet from the new side lot line to the north. The building will be 75 feet from the wetland. Each unit will have a balcony. The building as shown includes brick, steel, and glass with stucco accents. The mechanical units will need to be shielded froi-n public view. Page I of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Currently the site slopes toward the east/southeast, away from the street, dropping 12 feet in the first 119 feet. It appears that a substantial amount of fill will need to be brought in to accommodate the project. In addition, the site is wooded and the grading for the building, parking lot, and stormwater management will require the removal of most of the trees outside of the wetland. The project will be served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. Barnhart stated while this is not a public hearing, Staff has received one public comment expressing a concern regarding the number of units being proposed. The property is currently zoned B-4 Office Professional but is guided for mixed use with a prescribed density of 6-15 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan suggests mixed use to include senior assisted living, townhomes, condominiums, or apartment buildings. From a use standpoint, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the proposed density does allow the City to offset lower density in other areas. Barnhart noted the proposed project is slightly higher than 15 units per acre. Thiesse asked where West Lafayette Road is located. Barnhart indicated it is south of this property off of Shadywood. Thiesse noted that is where the public comment was received from and that the person's property is outside of the 350 -foot zone. Barnhart stated one of the concerns expressed by that person related to traffic in addition to the density. Since it is likely some type of development will happen on the site, the question is whether what is being proposed is appropriate for the site. Barnhart stated currently there is quite a bit of traffic on Shadywood, with residential generating a substantial amount of that traffic, but that the overall traffic situation hamstrings redevelopment of the site. Lemke stated he has a concern that no one from the public is here. Page 2 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart noted this is a sketch plan review and that a formal public hearing has not been noticed. Barnhart indicated this is basically an opportunity for the applicant to hear from the Planning Commission and City Council on what they envision for the site. Thiesse stated one of his concerns is the three stories and a penthouse, especially since it will be five stories from the back. Olson asked how many units would be in the building if the density is reduced down to 15 units per acre. Barnhart noted the applicant is proposing 15.75 units. Barnhart stated the Comprehensive Plan lists a range of appropriate densities and that it is up to the City to determine what they would like to see on this site. Olson asked if a traffic study would be able to determine the traffic levels between different uses. Barnhart indicated that can be done, and given the higher density, a traffic study would be very appropriate. Lemke asked whether this proposal has been discussed with Hennepin County. Barnhart stated Hennepin County is comfortable with the proposed access. Barnhart illustrated the location of the shared driveway and the surrounding access points. Schoenzeit stated in his view it would be important to hear from the Fire Chief to see whether they would be able to fight a fire at this location given the height of the building. Schoenzeit stated the City is in need of higher density and that the City should not shy away from the higher density, especially since this is an area the City is hoping to redevelop to help bring in additional customers for the existing businesses. Thiesse commented in his view this is a perfect spot for this type of building but that it might be difficult to get approval for a five -story building and 15 units per acre. Landgraver asked if there are any trails planned for this area. Page 3 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated the developer is not proposing any trails but that there is an easement along Shadywood to hopefully someday provide a connection to the trail further up the road. Thiesse asked if any park land will be dedicated or could be required. Barnhart stated generally a residential development will trigger that requirement and that it will need to be reviewed. Leskinen asked if the soils have been tested to see whether underground parking is doable on the site given the wetlands in the area. Barnhart indicated that will be part of the due diligence the developer will do, but at this stage of review it is not required. Schoenzeit stated if the water table permits it, the first floor could be pushed further into the ground to help alleviate some of the concerns with the height of the structure. Tom Goodrum, Senior Planner with Westwood Engineering, stated he is representing Alex Ugorets, tonight who is currently out of state. Goodrum indicated he has worked with Alex Ugorets on a number of projects throughout the years and that Alex would like to let the Planning Commission know that he is excited about being part of the redevelopment of the Navarre area. One of the reasons Alex Ugorets purchased the Freshwater building is because he wants to be part of what is happening in the Navarre area. Goodrum noted Mr. Ugorets also purchased the land next to the Freshwater building as well another nine acres for a total of 12 acres, which gives him quite a bit of land to move things around to make things work. Goodrum stated if the 9 -acre parcel is added to this parcel, they would be down to 4.75 units per acre. Goodrum indicated they could work with the density somewhat but that it comes down to whether this is a good fit for the site. Goodrum stated they are interested in hearing what the Planning Commission thinks about the proposed project. Page 4 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Goodrum stated they looked at the character of the neighborhood when designing the building and that they knew traffic, density, and the height of the building would be concerns. Goodrum noted they do have a traffic engineering component to their company and that they have already met with representatives from Hennepin County. A formal traffic study has not been completed at this point but an internal memorandum regarding the traffic has been completed within the company. Goodrum stated if these are market rate, fall family units, it is anticipated there will be 23 AMP trips on the county road, which is less than three percent of the total traffic in the area. Goodrum stated they are well within acceptable parameters for traffic in the area. Goodrum stated they are also looking at a higher market -end rate building and that they expect more seniors and more retired people to live in the building, which will help reduce traffic even further. As far as fitting this building in with the neighborhood, the plan as presented proposes very minimal grading impacts to the site and works with the actual grade on the site. Goodrum stated the building in the front would be 30 feet in height, with three stories in the front. Goodrum stated they are basically following the grade as it goes down. Goodrum stated what is being seen from the back side are the three stories and the penthouse, which matches the front, and the added height is the garage level. Thiesse noted the people in the back will see five stories. Goodrum concurred it will be a taller building but that they are working with the topography instead of bringing fill in. Goodrum indicated they can bring a bunch of dirt in to cover the bottom level, which does not make a lot of sense, since it can be screened with landscaping. Goodruin stated they are also looking at how this building will compare with the neighboring Freshwater building. This building will have 31 feet at the front when facing Shadywood Road and the penthouses are toward the back on the north side, which raises it to approximately 40 feet. The 54 feet is from the back side from the bottom of the garage to the top of the penthouse. Goodrum pointed out the Freshwater building on the adjoining site has the same heights. Goodrum stated they took the height of the Freshwater building at its highest point, matched it on this building, and then dropped it off to 30 feet in the front, which is the same as the Freshwater building. Goodrum indicated they tried to match what already exists on the Freshwater site and that they are not putting a tall building Page 5 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. next to a short building. Goodrum noted there is another 400 feet before the first residential house with 40 -foot tall trees in between. Goodrum stated they also attempted to locate the building where it would not have a huge visual impact to the residential properties in the back. The building is tilted and located further back off of Shadywood, with only one comer being up against the 35 -foot setback. The rest of the building will be further back. Goodruin stated for someone coming down Shadywood, there will not be that tunnel effect since that building will be 100 feet back from the road. The plan also incorporates berms and landscaping to help break the appearance of the building up. Goodrum noted no headlights will be seen from the residents' homes and that the building is tucked into the site. Goodrum stated they took the neighbors into consideration when designing the building. Goodrum stated in their view they have put together a well thought out plan and that they also looked at the zoning for the properties across the street to make sure this development would fit in. One of the objectives with the plan is to help bring people down to the Navarre area. Reconstruction of the Freshwater building has resulted in a number of positive comments and activity. Goodrum noted they require the 50 units to make this project economically feasible and that it fits in well with the neighborhood. Goodrum noted they also met with representatives from the Watershed District and that they are happy with the fact that they can meet the wetland buffers and setbacks. Goodrum stated the building height is a little scary when you hear five stories, but that if you walk through the plan and look at the various elements, that fear is alleviated. Schoenzeit asked if the building would be precast concrete with 8 -foot ceilings. Goodrum indicated the architects have not decided on that yet and that this is a concept plan at this time. Schoenzeit stated if wood is used for the framing, the building would be even higher. Thiesse asked about the ordinary high water level. Page 6 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Goodrum stated they have not done any soil borings for this site at the present time but that soil borings were done on the Freshwater site and they did not hit groundwater at 14 feet. Goodrum indicated they also took a look at the wetland delineation that was done in the past. Goodrum stated they are confident they will not be getting water underneath the building but that borings have not been done at this site yet. Thiesse asked if they are considering spread footings for the building and not pile footings. Goodrum indicated they would be spread footings. Thiesse asked about access for fire trucks. Goodrum noted they have a shared driveway in the lower area where the garage will be located and that they will have to take a look at the fire codes to see whether access is needed all the way around the building. Barnhart stated from past experience he would expect the fire chief to require a hard surface so they can be within 150 feet of any portion of the building. Barnhart stated that might require the driveway to be extended somewhat. Lenike asked if there is a number on the units that would be a deal breaker. Goodrum indicated they would need between 45 and 55 units to make things work and that they started with a 50 -unit building. Goodrum stated he realizes the density is at 15.75 but that they could add some land to this parcel if necessary. Landgraver asked how many units the penthouses are. Goodrum indicated they would be between two and four depending on how big the units are. Landgraver asked if the penthouses will be rented out at a higher rate than the other floors. Landgraver stated he is not sure if there is a Plan B of what it would look like without the penthouse suites but that it Page 7 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. might be something to consider if there is a lot of resistance to the height. Landgraver stated he likes the rationale that the Freshwater building is 54 feet in height. Goodrum stated the penthouse part is being proposed due to market demand and that they also help out with the economics of the building. Thiesse asked if any variances would be required as currently proposed. Barnhart stated it depends on the zoning and that a PUD would likely lessen the number of variances that would be required. Barnhart stated he would recommend going that route but that this review helps provide direction to the applicant to make it approvable. Lemke asked if there would be a demand for this many units. Goodrum stated they have not done a formal market analysis, but from what they are hearing there is a demand for housing in this area. Schoenzeit asked what type of rent they are looking at and square footage of the units. Goodrum indicated he does not have that information. Leskinen asked if they are anticipating older clientele. Goodrum commented it would be higher market rate but that it has not been determined what age group to market to at this time. Goodrum stated they are hearing more from older people who would like to remain in the area and that there appears to be a demand for both ownership and rental. Thiesse stated the City has heard there is a demand for smaller units. Landgraver commented empty nesters like to stay in the area. Page 8 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffron noted there are two other buildings in Orono of this magnitude. One is the senior housing located at Brown and Wayzata Boulevard. From an architectural standpoint, the Council was very adamant that those buildings have pitched roofs rather than a flat roof. Thiesse noted the Freshwater building next door has a flat roof as well as a number of other buildings in Navarre. Lemke stated he likes the idea of a continuous project on these parcels. Lemke noted there already is some massing in the area with the Freshwater building and that this project continues that massing, which he is not opposed to. Lemke stated he also likes the contemporary design and that in his view the building helps to upgrade the Navarre/Orono area. Lemke stated the traffic in the area concerns him but that it sounds like that will be addressed. Lemke stated in his view this project will help revitalize the Navarre area. Lemke stated the main concern he has is the nearby residential neighborhood. Lemke noted the City has run into a number of public hearings with the neighbors and that there are a number of single-family homes in this area and now all of a sudden they are proposing throwing in a major development. Lemke suggested the developer hold some neighborhood meetings to get them on board with what is being proposed for the site. Goodrum stated Staff has made them aware of that and that they are ready to send a letter out to the neighborhood in the near future. Goodrum stated they wanted to hear from the Planning Commission first. Thiesse stated the people across the road will have different concerns and that they might want to split them into a different group. Landgraver commented planting some evergreen trees might also be beneficial to the residential properties. Goodrum stated it comes down to approximately four homes that will have the biggest impact and that they will do their best to appease them. Page 9 of 11 MINUTES OF THE Council ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit C Tuesday, February 21, 2017 17-3903 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke noted very little vegetation is being shown around the building and that from a visual standpoint, some vegetation would help soften the building a little. Goodrum indicated they will create some 3D illustrations but that the trees are pretty dense near the property line and wetland area. As a result, there is a pretty good buffer but that he likes the idea of planting more evergreens. Landgraver stated he does not mind the density being slightly over target and that aligning the entry and exit is good so they are further away from the intersection. Landgraver stated he does have a concern about the height from the back but that he likes how the building is angled off the street. Goodrum stated the third property to the south will be most impacted. Leskinen asked if those properties are lower in elevation than this building. Thiesse indicated the land starts to go back up at that point. Barnhart suggested they create a graphic depicting the elevation of the building as well as the trees and berms. Olson stated he agrees with being consistent on the flat roofs. Olson stated if there is a way to warm up the building somehow, that would be good, and that he would like to soften up the appearance of the building somehow. Olson stated it would be hard to change the roofline given the other office buildings in the area since it would not be consistent. Lemke stated in one of the renderings it almost looks like a green roof, and that if it is not going to be a green roof, it might be a little misleading. Goodrum stated they are entertaining that but that it comes down to pricing. Goodrum stated the flat roof adds a nice feature to the penthouses and for water treatment. Page 10 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated he likes the sketch plan a lot but that he would caution the applicant that the next time they meet there will likely be a full house. Thiesse suggested the applicant also meet with the Navarre business owners in the area as well. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. Page 11 of 11 ifa DATE: TO: FROM: RE: March 26, 2017 Alex Ugorets John and Linda Freivalds Proposed Freshwater Apartments Council Exhibit E 17-3903 RECEIVED MAR 0 1 12017 CITY OF ORONO Thank you for your recent letter about the proposed project. We shared your letter with Linda's brother-in-law, Steve Gray, who is the son of Dick Gray, founder of the Freshwater Foundation. Steve served on the board of the Freshwater Foundation for many years. In response to your letter, Steve noted that many of the building recommendations you are making were rejected by the city in 1972 at the time of construction. Enclosed is the response we received from Steve. Our Issues Your project will be neutral to us at best. We will derive no benefit and it will most likely result in a lower property value for our home and land as well as for our neighbors. We have some questions: 1. Will the building be condos or apartments? What will the price range be? How many units? How much indoor vs. outdoor parking? The answers will affect nearby property values. 2. How do you propose to protect the wetlands during construction and beyond? Has there been or will there be an environmental impact study of the effects of the building and parking on the wetlands? Please recognize that your project will infringe on the existing "nature preserve" where deer, foxes, turkeys, quail and many species of birds dwell and prosper. ON THE MARSH 2585 OLD BEACH ROAD WAYZATA, MN 55391 USA Tel: 540-460-2140 email: john@jfamarketing.com www.ifamarkets.com 3. We are concerned about privacy and, regardless of your tree buffer, residents can easily end up trespassing on our land to walk their dogs or to take a shortcut through our property to Old Beach Road. To get our support, we want a privacy fence built across your property line from Rte. 19 to the edge of the marsh. We contacted Sterling Fence, the company that has installed all the fencing on our property, for an estimate for the boundary fence and it is enclosed. Additionally will there be a fence and/or tree buffer to block the view of the parking lot from Rte. 19? 4. Neighbors have also expressed concern about the visual aspects of the building including height, size, and finish materials as well as the size and placement of the surface parking lot. We have a concerned community on Old Beach Road. After an accident involving a driver hitting a school bus on Old Beach Road a few years ago, the residents successfully requested that the City of Orono close the access from Rte. 19. The street had been used by many drivers as a shortcut between Rtes. 15 and 19. Even with the "DEAD END" sign at the entrance to Old Beach Road many people still attempt to cut through. In the end, the City of Orono put boulders across the closed portion of the road to prevent automobile access. This is why the fence is needed. We simply don't trust people to do the "right thing" and respect private property. The real estate law firm of DeWitt Ross & Stevens is consulting with us regarding this development and how best to preserve our neighborhood interests. We are sending a copying of this letter to the City of Orono to make them aware of our neighborhood concerns. Sincerely, John Freivalds in a VVelley Freivalds cc: Jeremy Barnhardt, Community Development Director Roger Peitso, Building Official Anna Carlson, City Clerk (for distribution) (LIU ct) );2msx 44 14 1 f ej Itl —JA)7W 411, �-fbc 2/2612ol7 Gmail GM01 - OMG Linda Freivalds <Ilindafordkelley@gmail.com�" S . un, . Feb 26, 2017 at 2:23 IPM OMG -eivalds <Iindafordkelley@gmail.com�' Linda FY afordkelleY@gma"-com> Draft TO: LJnda Kelley Freivalds <Und __ Forwarded message ` From: Carol Burton Gray :07 PM Date: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4 ljndafordkelley@gmail.Com> Subject: Ol\AG john@jfarnad,,eting.COm>, Unda Frehlalds TO: John Freivalds Steves comments perty when they built in 1972. point #I: The Freshwater couldn't have 3 stories on their Pro Point #2: They couldn't expand because of the rharsh, and now they're expanding. 't allowed. Point #3: The Freshwater wanted to build more than 52,000 square feet but weren paid - now they want taxes, but they'll ruin the wetland and Point #4'. The Freshwater was a non-profit SO few 'axes roperty - as you well know. create traffic and hard -Cover on that land that vAll create run-off on your p point #5: Love the parking lots and the landscaping around the proposed building - NOT! point #6*. Build a wall! Carol and Steve m > Z 0 0 > > M .0 > A Al IL IL 1, IL zz M &OPM, Dear Neighbor, I want to inform you of a project that I'm proposing south of our renovated Freshwater Building. In conjunction with our current improvements we are planning a market rate condominium/apartment building to the south of the building. The building is three stories with penthouse units along the back in the northeast comer. It will match the heights of the Freshwater building and then step down toward the south where it will transition toward the wetland and woods. A 75 -foot wetland buffer and trees will separate the site from the neighborhood. The building will be placed back into the site and away from CR 19 with underground parking and surface parking to the north. (Site plan and concept drawings attached) We are reaching out to you as adjacent property owners so you are aware of our intent. We have met with city staff, Hennepin County and the Watershed and are complying to their comments. Although a public notice is not required at this time we wanted you to know before rumors or misinformation start to spread. If you have any questions please contact me or Tom Goodrum at Westwood Engineering, our development consultants at the numbers below. Thanks Alex Ugorets; 612-363-3321 Tom Goodrum, Senior Planner Westwood Engineering, 952-906-7425 AGENDAITEM Item No.: 13 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 17-3894 City of Orono, Text Amendment: Non -encroachments Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The Ordinance as drafted would permit the placement of low structures (retaining walls and planters) in side yards, and alter the permitting requirements for grading. 2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable. 3. Background/Summary. At their workshop on January 23', Council directed staff to remove burdens to retaining wall placement; the Council noted that restrictions related to retaining wall and other minor improvements impact small lot owners' disproportionately. In summary, the draft ordinance: a. Allows retaining walls and planters less than 2 feet in height in required yards (within the setback area) without a permit, b. Allows retaining walls and planters higher than 2 feet or less than 5 feet from a property line, with a permit, c. Removes the grading component of the previous ordinance; grading is addressed in the shoreland and land alteration sections of the City Code, d. Removes the Conditional Use Permit requirement for 'unusual land alterations', these activities will require a permit, e. Removes the references to rip -rap. The City refers all rip rap inquires to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. 4. Planning Commission comment. Planning Commission reviewed the issue at their meeting on February 21, 2017. That packet is incorporated by reference. They considered two options, one merely addressing the retaining wall/planter issue, and the second addressing that issue, in addition to other opportunities to clarify the code and processes, as summarized above. The Planning Commission recommended approval of option 13, included. 5. Public Comment. No comments for or against the proposed ordinance have been received to date. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt, by motion, the ordinance as drafted. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. PC minutes February 21, 2017 - Draft Exhibit C. PC Staff Report References A. Planning Commission packet dated February 21, 2017 Prepared By: J. Bamhart Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R PC Exhibit B 17-3894 February 21, 2017 ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO RETAINING WALLS AND GRADING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF ORONO THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-1405(a) of the City of Orono Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: (5. 1) Retaining walls and planters, subject to the following provisions: a. Retaining walls and planters may be located in all required yards when all of the following conditions are met: 1. The structure is located at least ten feet from the edge of the traveled roadway; 2. The structure is not located within a drainage, utility, or other easement, except upon approval in writing for an encroachment agreement by the city; or similar approval from another regulatory and/or utility agency; 3. The structure creates no impacts to drainage direction, rate or volume for adjacent properties. 4. The structure is 2 (two) feet in height or less above existing grade. b-. Retaining walls whieh do not exeeed two feet in height above existing gr-etmd level, whieh are loeated within the pr-opefty and at least five feet fFom any pr-ep&4� 7 line, and fer- w-hieh the amount of impei4ed fill asseeiated with the stf:uetufe dees liet exeeed 20 etibie yards, do not r-equir-e a building or- land alteration pefffi e—. b. Retaining walls and planters exceeding two feet in height above existing ground level or- for- whieh the amottn4 of impot4ed fill asseeiated with the stpdaur-e exeeeds 20 eiibie yafds or which are located less than five feet from a side property line, shall require a land after-ati permit and upon recommendation of the building official inspeete may require city council review or a conditional use permit per the provisions of section 78-967. d-. c. Retaining walls and planters exceeding the allowed height of a fence in a given required yard shall be located so as to meet the required accessory structure setbacks established for that yard. SECTION 2. Section 78-967 of the City of Orono is amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-967. - Exception. (a) The requirements of section 78-966 are not intended to govern the following land alteration activities: (1) Normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or a newly constructed building, or the grading of the driveway serving such building. (2) Any earth movement less than 500 cubic yards which does not adversely impact the existing drainage. (3) Grading, filling or excavating of 50 cubic yards or less within the shore setback zone of all lakes enumerated in article IX of this chapter. (4) The following Unusual Land Alterations: M�VMMI .... . ... 110-1111 MA2� U 1 M ..... ..... 411 ... . ...... (1) All exeava4ions for- foundations in exeless of 12 feet a -ver -age depth if any amount of t exeless mater-ial femoved below 12 feet depth is to be stolekpiled en the site. (2) Any add4ional fill br-ought on site in exeess of 500 etibie yafds, exleept for fill required to raise grade foF adequate ftost footing prateetion, the intent being that stfuetufles shal be w4ifileially raised above the prelexisfing suffounding topography. (3) 6fading of altefa4iefis th4 would propose any ehanges in elevations within five feet Of adjaeen4 r-esiden4ial lot lines exelept f6r- drainage swales and ditehes. a.) Any unusual land alterations, including earth filling, removal or grading, proposed by a builder shall be subject to a permit. The following land alterations shall be considered as unusual land alterations: I . All excavations for foundations in excess of 12 feet average doth if any amount of the excess material removed below 12 feet depth is to be stockpiled on the site. 2. Any additional fill brought on site in excess of 500 cubic yards, excgpt for fill required to raise grade for adequate frost footing protection, the intent being that structures shall not be artificially raised above the preexisting surrounding topogr4phy,__ 3. Grading or alterations that would propose �Lny changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent residential lot lines except for drainage swales and ditches. (b) Such grading and earth movement shall be subject to approval by the building inspector at the time of issuance of a building permit, provided that a plan showing proper drainage and protection of adjoining property has been submitted. Where such earth movement is not being performed in conjunction with a building permit, a separate land alteration permit shall be required. (c) The building inspector shall have the authority to refer any requests for land alteration permits to the city council for review and approval in instances where the land alteration appears to potentially create negative impacts or be not in keeping with the goals and policies of the community management plan. SECTION 3. Section 78-969 — Permit for Rip Rap —is hereby deleted: Sec. 78-969. - Pemait f6r- fipr-ap. Purposely Left Blank SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this _ day of _, 2017 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 12017. MINUTES OF THE Council ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit B Tuesday, February 21, 2017 17-3894 6:30 o'clock p.m. 9. #17-3894 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: RETAINING WALLS AND GRADING, 8:40 - 9:07 P.M. Barnhart stated at the direction of the City Council, Staff has drafted an ordinance to address land alterations and retaining walls within the side yard setback. In 2015, the City Council and Planning Commission reviewed an ordinance amendment that regulated retaining walls as well as other things such as grading in residential districts. The type of permit required was dependent on the height, amount of soils being retained, and the location. As a result, the City Council felt that unnecessarily encumbered small residential lots and have directed Staff to alter that regulation. Barnhart stated the City has two options. Exhibit A basically regulates retaining walls and planters, and as long as they are less than two feet in height, those would be allowed to be located in the front yard or side yard area. The draft ordinance contained in Exhibit A removes a portion of the language which talks about the distance from the side lot setback line. The primary purpose with this option is to make it easy for people to have retaining walls, planters, or other low features in the side yard. In application, a planter bed with stones around it would technically be considered a structure and would be required to be set back. Barnhart stated Staff does not drive around looking for those type of landscaping features and it is likely those are occurring, but the current regulations actually prohibits them. Exhibit A would remove them to be within the required yard setbacks. The second option looks at this item more comprehensively and fixes the issue raised by the City Council in terms of the small retaining walls but also pulls out the grading requirements contained in the original ordinance. In addition, grading requirements were contained in the non -encroachment section of the code. Barnhart stated non -encroachments are those improvements listed that are allowed to extend into a setback without the need for a variance and are usually building related. Barnhart stated from a comprehensive standpoint, it does not make sense to have grading regulations in the non -encroachment section. Page 1 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Staff recommends Exhibit B. Barnhart stated one of his goals is to make it easier for the residents to understand the regulations. Barnhart noted the back page of Exhibit B talks about unusual land alterations, which are defined as excavations for foundations in excess of 12 feet, if excess material is stored on site, if there is more than 500 cubic yards of fill imported, or if you grade within five feet of adjacent residential lots. Barnhart stated those three things require a conditional use permit and that Staff is now proposing they will just require a permit. Barnhart stated this ordinance is still going through the review process but Staff is comfortable enough to recommend approval of Exhibit B subject to some minor tweaks from the City Attorney. Thiesse asked if he can put in a cut retaining wall within five feet of the lot line if any grading is done. Barnhart stated the person would need to get a permit for the grading. Thiesse stated one of his big concerns is someone cutting the roots on a tree located on the adjoining property line because they want to put in a retaining wall. Barnhart stated the City does not protect the trees and that they can be cut down. Thiesse asked what would happen if it was the neighbor's tree. Barnhart stated the permit would require that a grading plan be submitted. Thiesse stated if he cuts or erects a wall on his property and then the neighbor does the same thing, there will be two walls parallel to each other. Barnhart stated the City cannot give someone permission to go on someone else's property regardless of any permit that is obtained. Barnhart stated if the retaining wall is located right on the property line, in theory someone would have to get the permission of the neighbor to construct it since it is likely they would go on that person's property. Page 2 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated this ordinance is similar to the fencing ordinance. Barnhart stated fences have certain height requirements depending on where it is located on the lot and two people adjoining each other could put a fence right next to each other on the property line. Barnhart noted that does not happen very frequently. Thiesse stated fences and trees are more temporary where retaining walls tend to be more permanent. In addition, retaining walls can impact neighbors more since they typically require land alterations. Planters would be similar to fences and shrubbery. Thiesse stated he would like a little more thought put into this. Schoenzeit asked where the 2 -foot limit comes from on the retaining walls. Schoenzeit commented the two feet seems to be somewhat arbitrary, which is similar to the Y/ 11 " number on retaining walls. Schoenzeit stated the Y/1 1" might be a more appropriate number. Barnhart stated the two feet is just a carryover from the ordinance drafted in 2015. Thiesse stated in his view it should be reduced to 3'/6" because otherwise a railing is required. Schoenzeit stated the two feet seems arbitrary and low. Barnhart stated the number can be changed. Schoenzeit stated if walls at four feet require engineering, it seems that a retaining wall under this ordinance could go up to that height. Schoenzeit noted this code does not say a taller wall is prohibited but that a permit would be required for it. Schoenzeit stated previously no retaining walls were allowed within the 5 -foot setback. Lemke asked if a permit could be denied. Barnhart stated Staff would look at grading as well as location of any easements before issuing a permit. Shrubbery and minor improvements such as planters within the easement would probably be acceptable Page 3 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. but a retaining wall would require a little more review. In the case of a retaining wall, Staff would also look at the visibility of the wall but the decision will primarily be based on grading issues. Thiesse commented if the City is not going to allow it in an easement, why allow it anywhere else. Barnhart stated an easement gives a right to another entity, such as a utility company, and that the City does not let people build structures in an easement since the City has a duty to protect that area. Since the easement benefits the neighbors, most cities do not allow construction within an easement. Barnhart stated fences can be removed fairly easily but retaining walls are not that easy to move. Barnhart stated to say whether all permits would be approved is hard to say but those are the things that Staff would be looking at. Barnhart stated the height of the wall to be allowed is completely up to the Planning Commission and City Council. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. Schoenzeit stated the question of the retaining wall being cut or flat also seems arbitrary. Schoenzeit stated it comes back to the fence. Schoenzeit stated someone can put a fence in that setback without a permit and the City does not require a survey. If the fence is over the line, the person could be stuck with it. Schoenzeit stated the retaining wall, which is at a height of 2 feet or 3'/11" or 3'/6", or cut into the soil, is the same use of that piece of property, whether it is going positive or negative off of the person's land. Thiesse noted if someone changes the grade, a permit is required. Thiesse stated if the grade is altered in any direction, a permit is required, but a permit is not required for the actual wall. Barnhart stated the City does not differentiate between a retaining wall that is cut or filled. Page 4 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated if the retaining wall is a row of keystone blocks simply set on the ground, the City would have no control over it. Thiesse stated if it is a planter or a bench and the grade is not changed, a permit is not required. Thiesse stated a permit would only be required if the grade is changed. Barnhart stated Exhibit B states in Section 5. IB, retaining walls and planters exceeding two feet in height above existing grade, which are located than five feet from the side property line, shall require a land alteration permit. Barnhart noted Commissioner Schoenzeit's comments went to what would happen if someone stacks keystone blocks that are not retaining any dirt and whether that is different from a fence. Barnhart stated Staff perhaps needs to tweak that language a bit, but the main issue is if a retaining wall is retaining dirt or causing land disturbance. Barnhart stated if the wall includes land alteration, it will require a permit. Barnhart stated if someone just has a row of keystone blocks set on the ground to form a boundary around a planter bed, it may impact the drainage and would be an issue that will need to be addressed. Barnhart stated the language may need to be tweaked a little, but it might be as simple as, if the wall exceeds two feet in height, is less than five feet from property and includes land alteration, it shall require a land alteration permit. Schoenzeit stated if it does not change the land characteristics or change the water drainage, there would be no trigger for a permit and that the language should somehow trigger a review. Barnhart stated he will probably use land alteration and will work with the language a little. Lemke indicated he prefers Exhibit B. Landgraver asked what is being accomplished in Section 3, Part B. Barnhart stated the language basically states unusual riprap shall be referred by the City Engineer to the City Council for action in accordance with the chapter. If the City Engineer determines it is unusual, it would be considered under the conditional use permit section and would go to the City Council for action in accordance with this ordinance. Page 5 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated there are several sections in the Code where the City Engineer, Zoning Administrator, or City Administrator may refer things to the City Council. Landgraver commented the ordinance is shifting more judgments or decision making to Staff. Schoenzeit asked if riprap would require a Watershed permit if it is on the lakeside of the home and above the 929.4' elevation. Schoenzeit stated when he placed riprap on his property, the City was not involved and he had to obtain a permit through the Watershed District. Barnhart stated if it is above the 929.4' elevation, the City would then be involved. Landgraver indicated he agrees with Exhibit B more than A. Barnhart stated Staff is looking for direction on which one to send to the City Council. Leskinen moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3894, City of Orono, Text Amendment: Retaining Walls and Grading, Exhibit B, incorporating Commissioner Schoenzeit's comment regarding land alteration language in the appropriate sections. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 6 of 6 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: February 21, 2017 Subject: #17-3894, City of Orono, Text Amendment: Land Alteration Public Hearing Council Exhibit C 17-3894 Application Summary: The draft ordinance amends the regulations for Land Alterations and retaining walls throughout the city of Orono. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. Background This issue was not among the top 25 issues highlighted by the Planning Commission and City Council last fall, though the ordinances attempt to clarify regulation, which is a standing goal of development staff. In February 2015, the Council enacted an ordinance that altered the regulations for retaining walls, in particular retaining walls in the side yard. Mayor Walsh has concerns with the approved ordinance, noting, among other comments, that retaining walls require permits while fences and shrubbery can be just as impactful, and do not require permits. The current code regulates retaining walls and grading; the permitting process is defined based on the setback, height of the retaining wall, and volume of land being retained. The Council direction is to remove the burdens to retaining wall placement. This is accomplished with the draft noted as Exhibit A. To effectively manage the issue, and to clarify the regulation, staff proposes changes to the grading regulation contained within the city code, this is attached as Exhibit B. The draft ordinance allows retaining walls and other accessory structures less than 2 feet in height to be located anywhere on the lot (outside of drainage and utility easements and beyond 10 feet of the traveled roadway). No permit is required. Accessory structures higher than 2 feet, or located closer than 5 feet to the side property line, require a permit. The ordinance in Exhibit B reviews 'unusual land alterations', and does not require a conditional use permit for those of extra depth, or within the side property line. This section of the code is more restrictive than the shoreland rules. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. Draft Ordinance Exhibit C Summary of permitting requirements AGENDAITEM Item No.: 14 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 17-3896 City of Orono Text Amendment: Structural Coverage Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The proposed ordinance would alter the zoning ordinance as it pertains to structural coverage, either by removal of the 15% limitation (Exhibit A), or adjusting what is calculated (Exhibit B). 2. Minnesota Statute 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable 3. Background. Review of the Structural coverage regulations was the 3' highest ranked issues last fall. In January, the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would remove the structural coverage limitation, but had questions related to massing regulation. 4. Planning Commission comment. The Planning Commission reviewed two ordinances, one adjusting what is calculated as structural coverage while raising the limit from 15% to 20%, and the other removing the structural coverage limitation. The Planning Commission felt that the management of building mass, which is in part regulated by structural coverage has been important in the overall growth of the Community. Consequently, the Commission did not support an increase from 15% to 20% as the maximum, noting that this just moves the standard, people eventually will request variances from this revised standard. The Planning Commission recommended keeping the limit at 15%, but altering what is calculated. The Planning Commission did not support removal of the structural coverage requirement, nor did they support raising the maximum limit to 20% of lots between 10,000 sq. ft. and 2 acres. 5. Public Comment. No direct comments have been received on the proposed ordinance, though a comment on the mass of a proposed building is frequently received, suggesting that massing is a concern in many of our neighborhoods. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends Council approve one of the two ordinances. Retention of a structural calculation will maintain some level of massing protection. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve, by motion, one of the ordinances, as drafted or with modifications to address structural coverage. Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance — removing structural coverage B. Draft Ordinance — altering calculation parameters C. Planning Commission minutes February 21, 2017 — draft D. PC Staff Report References A. Planning Commission packet dated February 21, 2017 Prepared By: J. Bamhart Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R Council Exhibit A 17-3896 ORDINANCE NO. THIRD SERIES 2 3 CITY OF ORONO 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 7 PERTAINING TO REMOVING STRUCTURAL COVERAGE RESTRICTIONS AND 8 ADDING HARD COVER LIMITATIONS TO CERTAIN LOTS WITHIN THE CITY OF 9 ORONO 10 11 12 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: 13 SECTION 1. Section 78-1403 shall be amended by deleting the text to read as follows: 14 15 Sec. 78-1403. Lot Goverage and massing standards - 16 17 in all zoning districts other than the 1 industrial district, all lots that have a gross acreage of 18 less thaR twe aGres shall GOMply with the f0l'GWiRg massiRg Standards for struGtures: 19 (a) h4axingum total footpr4nts allowed. 20 (1 ) On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined 21 footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the 22 gross lot area, 23 (2) On lots of less than 10,000 square feet In area, the total combined footprints of all 24 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 25 (b) GaiGulation of massing. The fGHOWiRg shall be included an the Ga!GulatiOR of the total 26 combined footprints by structure-&� 27 (1 ) All roofed structures more than sox feet above existing ground level. 28 (2) TeRR'S GOUFtS, paties, deGks, and all shrnHar epeR strUGWres wheR partially Or fUlly 29 eRGIE)sed by fenGes, raiiiRgs or walls whiGh extend rnore than six feet above existing 30 ground level (if any portion of such structures extends more than sox feet above grade 31 level, the eRtire struGtures shall GOURt toward lot Goverage). 32 33 SECTION 2. Section 78-1685 shall be amended by deleting the text to read as follows: 34 35 Sec. 78-1685. - Massing standards. 36 37 (1) Non industr4al zoning distr4ets. ExGept for parGels ZORed 'Relustr4, all l0tS iR the storrnwater 38 quality overlay district that have a gross acreage of less than two acres shall comply with the 39 followiRg massing standards f0F StFUGtUres. 40 a.&4aximum total fbetpr4pts aflowe�. 41 1. On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined 42 feetprints of all PF'RGipal and aGE;essoFy StFUGtLIres shall not eXGeed 15 peFGent ef the 43 gross lot area, 44 2. On lots of less than 10,000 square feet On area, the total combined footprints of all 45 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 46 b. GaiGulation of n9assing. The following shall be inGluded in the GaIGUlation of the total 47 GGrnbined footprints by StFUGtUres-1 48 1. All Feefed stFuGtures m0re than sox feet above exiGtiRg ground level. 49 2. Tennis Gourts, paties, deoks, and all similaF open stFuGtures wheR partially or fully 50 enGlosed by fenGes, railings or walls whiGh extend mere than six feet above existing 51 gFound level (of any paFtion E)f such struGtures extends meFe thaR sox feet above gFade 52 level, the entiFe stFuGtuFe shall GGURt tE)waFd let eoveFage)- 53 (12) Industrial zoning district. For parcels zoned industrial, the following massing standards for 54 structures shall apply. 55 a. On lots equal to or less than three acres in area, the total combined footprints of all 56 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. 57 b. On lots greater than three acres in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and 58 accessory structures shall not exceed 45 percent of the gross lot area; except that when the 59 total building floor area on a site is contained within a single building, and when the total 60 area used for loading terminals, docks and berths is completely enclosed within the same 61 single building, a lot coverage of not more than 60 percent of the gross lot area will be 62 permitted. 63 64 SECTION 3. Section 78-1700 shall be amended by adding text to read as follows: 65 66 Sec. 78-1700. - Specific tier regulations. 67 Per the official stormwater quality overlay district map, each property in the stormwater quality 68 protection overlay district is assigned to a protection tier based on its relative distance to receiving 69 waters. This protection tier dictates the specific protection measures that must be implemented. 70 (1) Tier I parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross lot area. 71 (2) Tier 2 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 30 percent of the gross lot area. 72 (3) Tier 3 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. 73 (4) Tier 4 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross lot area. 74 (5) Tier 5 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 85 percent of the gross lot area. 75 (6) Hardcover in parcels not assigned to a Tier shall not exceed 75 percent of the gross lot 76 area. 77 SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its 78 passage and publication. 79 ADOPTED this _ day of 2017 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the 80 City Council of Orono, Minnesota. 81 82 ATTEST: 83 84 85 86 Diane Tiegs, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 12017. Council Exhibit B 17-3896 ORDINANCE NO. THIRD SERIES 2 3 CITY OF ORONO 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 7 PERTAINING TO REMOVING STRUCTURAL COVERAGE RESTRICTIONS WITHIN 8 THE CITY OF ORONO 9 10 I I THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: 12 SECTION 1. Section 78-1403 shall be amended by deleting the text to read as follows: 13 14 Sec. 78-1403. – Lot coverage and massing standards. 15 16 In all zoning districts other than the I—Industrial district, all lots that have a gross acreage of 17 less than two acres shall comply with the following massing standards for structures: 18 (a) Maximum total footprints allowed. 19 (11 ) On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined 20 footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the 21 gross lot area. 22 (2) On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all 23 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 24 (b) Calculation of massing. The following shall be included in the calculation of the total 25 combined footprints by structures: 26 (1) All roofed structures where the highest point of the roof is more than six feet above 27 existing ground level. 28 (2) TeRROS GEMFtS, paties, ded(s, and all sirnilaF opeR StFuGtwes wheR paFtially or fully 29 enGlosed by fenGes, railings or walls whiGh extend mere than sox feet above existing 30 gFE)URd level (of aRy PE)FtOOR of suGh stFuGtwes eXteRds mere than sox feet abE)ve gFad8 31 level, the eRtiFe stFuGtwes shall GE)URt toward lot E;everage)_ 32 33 SECTION 2. Section 78-1685 shall be amended by deleting the text to read as follows: 34 35 Sec. 78-1685. - Massing standards. 36 37 (1) Non -industrial zoning districts. Except for parcels zoned industrial, all lots in the stormwater 38 quality overlay district that have a gross acreage of less than two acres shall comply with the 39 following massing standards for structures. 40 a. Maximum total footprints allowed. 41 1. On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined 42 footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the 43 gross lot area. 44 2. On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all 45 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. 46 b. Calculation of massing. The following shall be included in the calculation of the total 47 combined footprints by structures: 48 1. All roofed structures where the highest point of the roof is more than six feet above 49 existing ground level. 50 2. Tennis GGUFtS, paties, deGks, and all similar open StrUGtUres when partially or fully 51 endesed by feRGeS, Failings E)F walls whieh extend mere thaR sox feet above existing 52 gFound level (of any paFtien of suGh stFUGtUFes extends r:nE)Fe than sox feet above grade 53 level, the entire StFUGture shall GGunt toward 10t Goverage). 54 (2) Industrial zoning district. For parcels zoned industrial, the following massing standards for 55 structures shall apply. 56 a. On lots equal to or less than three acres in area, the total combined footprints of all 57 principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. 58 b. On lots greater than three acres in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and 59 accessory structures shall not exceed 45 percent of the gross lot area; except that when the 60 total building floor area on a site is contained within a single building, and when the total 61 area used for loading terminals, docks and berths is completely enclosed within the same 62 single building, a lot coverage of not more than 60 percent of the gross lot area will be 63 permitted. 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this _ day of _, 2017 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2017. MINUTES OF THE Council ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit C Tuesday, February 21, 2017 17-3896 6:30 o'clock p.m. 10. #17-3896 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: STRUCTURAL COVERAGE, 9:07 P.M. — 9:44 P.M. Barnhart stated similar to the last application, Staff has prepared two separate draft ordinances regarding structural coverage. The City Council directed Staff to review the structural coverage limit. The Council felt that the structural coverage limit might be burdensome to homeowners since there is also a hardcover limitation. Barnhart stated the challenge that Staff has is there seems to be a strong concern or desire from the public to protect the massing issue. Barnhart stated structural coverage basically addresses a massing issue. Barnhart stated the Council has indicated a desire to reduce regulatory burdens on small lots. In many areas of the community, where there is a structural component, there is also a hardcover component. Barnhart stated under the stormwater quality ordinance, there are some opportunities to simply rely on the hardcover limitations to address the massing goals. In response to the City Council direction, Staff has drafted two ordinances. Exhibit A does what the Council would like to accomplish, which removes references to lot coverage and massing standards. The section regulating massing has been removed and there is no language regarding calculation of massing and also no maximum or minimum structural coverage depending on the lot side. Exhibit A also modifies Section 78-1685 where it talks about calculations of massing in the nonindustrial zoning districts. Barnhart noted the massing standards in the industrial zoning district will stay. To address some limitation of hardcover throughout the community, in Section 78-17 on Page 2 the City is broken into six districts. The first five districts provide a hardcover limitation ranging from 25 percent to 85 percent. In addition, there is a portion of the community that is exempt from the hardcover limitations. Barnhart stated the draft ordinance prescribes a hardcover limitation in those areas that are exempt in the stormwater quality map to 75 percent of the gross lot area. All references to structural coverage have been removed and the hardcover is based on the gross lot area. Barnhart stated the draft ordinance also addresses the goal of removing redundant regulation. Thiesse asked Staff to describe a lot that does not have a hardcover limitation. Page 1 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart indicated they are primarily located in the center one-third of the City and over 1,000 feet away from a lake or tributary. Barnhart stated the main concern of the Council was that the 15 percent limitation is onerous on the citizens, create unnecessary ordinances, and does not allow the freedom of folks to reinvest in their property. Exhibit B raises the limit from 15 percent to 20 percent. For lots less than 10,000 square feet, it raises the structural coverage limit from 1,500 square feet to 2,000 square feet. Barnhart noted Staff had recommended that originally some years ago. Exhibit B also modifies the calculation of massing to basically include just roofed structures if they are over six feet. If it is a roofed area, such as a doghouse, that is below six feet, that would not be counted. In addition, some modifications have been made to the nonindustrial zoning districts to be consistent with what was discussed with Exhibit A. Staff supports Exhibit B since it reaches the City Council's goal and maintains some limits on massing Barnhart noted last year the City reviewed four structural variances and each one of those applications would be helped by this draft ordinance since none of them exceeded the 20 percent. Landgraver stated even if the limit is moved to 20 percent, there will always be people pushing the limit. Barnhart stated he does not deny that people will always try to push the limit. The other side of the coin is if there is no line, there would be no limitations. Barnhart stated the concern from a Staff level is the impact on residential neighborhoods but yet still trying to accommodate what people are attempting to do. Lemke asked what the outcome was on those four variance requests. Barnhart stated to his belief all four of those variances were approved. Thiesse stated it is very likely that the other applications that were over 15 percent were directed by Staff to reduce it. Thiesse noted the 15 percent has been a benchmark for a long time. Thiesse stated if the limit is increased, the City will not have as many variance requests. Page 2 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated the other regulations need to be enforced more strictly so someone does not use this extra structural coverage to encroach into the setbacks. Thiesse stated the City can control it by not granting other variances. Landgraver asked how many lots would be affected by this. Barnhart stated the lots that would benefit the most would be those that consist of less than one acre. Barnhart indicated there are quite a number of those lots that are close to the lake or in the southern third of the community. Landgraver noted they are talking about a 33 percent increase in massing or a 36 percent increase in massing. Landgraver stated the City has had neighbors that have expressed concerns about how big the house will be next to them and that he does not know how this ordinance benefits those lots. Barnhart stated Staff is looking for some direction from the Planning Commission. Landgraver stated in his view the City has a process already in place and that the 15 percent has been a benchmark for years. Landgraver commented this is almost like a solution in search of a problem and that the current process seems to work, even on the four applications that the City had last year. Landgraver stated he has a problem with bumping it up to 3 3 percent or 3 6 percent. Thiesse stated he is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver and that asking for a variance should not be an easy process. Thiesse commented people like to live in Orono and that it is easy to tell when you drive around the lake which community you are in. Thiesse stated just because someone wants a big house on a small lot on the lake does not mean it needs to be an easy process. Schoenzeit noted the City also had a similar discussion with the hardcover and that the City is seeing fewer hardcover variances as a result of the changes. Page 3 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffton stated the City is seeing somewhat fewer requests. In the past the City would typically see a variance on a small lot for 45 percent and now the City is seeing 25 to 30 hardcover requests. Gaffron stated in his view there was benefit to the lakeshore property owners being able to do something without a variance but that Staff would have to research it more to quantify it. Schoenzeit stated the other part that is not being discussed in either Option A or B is whether they should eliminate the deck from the structural calculation. Schoenzeit stated at 20 percent, the needle will be moved quite a bit. Barnhart stated modifying the structural coverage regulation gives the City the opportunity to hold firm on other regulations, such as setbacks and hardcover issues. Barnhart stated the City does not need to grant variances to setbacks provided the setbacks are the correct ones for that lot. Barnhart stated out of the 41 variances granted last year, 19 dealt with lot area and width and 19 dealt with setbacks, which tells him that the setbacks might not be appropriate. Barnhart stated the process perhaps should not be easy, but more than half of the people should not have to go through the variance process to make reinvestments in their home, which is what the Council is looking at. Thiesse stated to his knowledge most of the variances occur on the lakeshore lots and that a lot of the variances are where people are attempting to maximize their lot. Barnhart stated the variances that typically are not approved are expansions into the 75 -foot setback or hardcover in excess of the limits. Thiesse stated his fear is that the City is jumping pretty quickly into this and that he wants the City to have something in place that will work. Thiesse stated he would like to ensure that this has worked ten years from now. Lemke commented it would be nice if the City could come up with some numbers and stick with them. Landgraver stated it is not just about the applicant but the community at large that has concerns about the size of the house. Landgraver stated he does not want to foolishly open the gates to allowing a third larger house and that there needs to be a balance throughout the community. Page 4 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse pointed out there is a fine line of increasing the value of the property by increasing the size of the house. Schoenzeit noted the direction from the Council was incorporated into Option A and that this is an opportunity for the Planning Commission to make a suggestion that there is something in between Option A and where the City is currently. Schoenzeit stated the Council should be told that the Planning Cominission has thought about it and has urged some caution. Schoenzeit stated if this ordinance adjustment does not have the desired effect of fewer variances, the City needs to understand why that is. Schoenzeit noted the Planning Commission does not get to decide what the final number is but they can make recommendations. Schoenzeit stated eliminating the decks from the calculation might cover it rather than completely getting rid of the 15 percent limit. Landgraver noted the City will also be doing a Comprehensive Plan review and that something of this magnitude might be best considered as part of that overall discussion. Schoenzeit stated removing the decks from the calculation could be a start. Thiesse stated the smaller lots believe they are being affected the most and another 120 feet of structure is quite a lot for that size of lot. Lemke asked if there is anything wrong with what the City has now. Thiesse stated the nice thing with the 15 percent is that the City has held pretty tightly to that and that the reason the City only saw four applications was because they were directed to reduce it. Thiesse stated very seldom does the City allow it to go beyond that. Thiesse indicated he can live with removing the deck from the calculation and leaving it at 15 percent but that in his view 20 percent is a lot. Thiesse stated if the deck is also removed from the structural coverage calculation, it could amount to a 40 percent increase on some lots. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission can choose to deny or make modifications to either of them. Page 5 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse asked what would happen under Option A if someone has a property with 35 percent hardcover and wants to reduce it down to 30 percent. Barnhart indicated those would be handled the same. Thiesse stated it could become a situation where the majority of it becomes structure. Barnhart stated if the hardcover limit is 35, someone could construct a house at 33 percent without a driveway and then say they require a driveway and need to go over the 35 percent. Barnhart stated someone will always try to push that envelope. Barnhart noted under Option B the structural coverage limit would be eliminated and people would only need to comply with the hardcover limit. Landgraver stated as it relates to Exhibit B, he would propose the Planning Commission not agree to the 20 percent but keep it at 15, not agree to the 2,000 square feet, agree to the highest point of the roof if more than six feet, and then accept the changes on the last page, which incorporates Commissioner Schoenzeit's comment of allowing decks but keeps it at 15 percent. Thiesse indicated he would like to keep the 1,500 square feet and allow decks to be excluded independent of its height off the ground. Gaffron stated one of the four applications last year was purely because a portion of the deck railing was above six feet and that those changes would eliminate only one variance request. Lemke asked if there would be a limit on the size of the deck. Thiesse stated they would still need to meet hardcover limits. Lemke stated the impact from a deck could be as much as a driveway. Schoenzeit stated someone could have 400 square feet of patio with a 400 square foot deck over it. Schoenzeit noted someone is allowed 100 square feet of deck. Page 6 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffton stated the deck would need to meet the standard of quarter spacing in order to get the 100 foot credit. Thiesse noted the ordinance alters the massing standards in the nonindustrial zone as well. Barnhart stated it is currently in two locations in the regulations and that this would eliminate the redundancy. Schoenzeit stated in his view the Council is going to no structural limit and that the Planning Commission should encourage some level of structural coverage. Thiesse stated to his understanding the Planning Commission is considering Exhibit B. Barnhart stated what he has heard Erom the Planning Commission as it relates to Option B is that the limit should remain at 15 percent, remain at 1,500 square feet, retain the language pertaining to the roof, and eliminating decks, tennis courts, etc., from the calculation. Thiesse asked what a nonindustrial zone district is. Barnhart indicated it would be residential lots. Gaffron stated the City only has 40 acres of industrial. Thiesse asked what Section 78-1403, lot coverage and massing standards, is regulating. Barnhart stated the regulation is found in the code twice, which is why it is reflected here. Barnhart indicated there likely will be some additional modifications to the ordinance as it goes through the process. Thiesse stated he is not looking at this as the final ordinance but that he does not have enough information to tell him that this is the right direction to go. Page 7 of 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart noted this will likely be the only time the Planning Commission reviews the draft ordinance unless the City Council sends it back to the Planning Commission. Thiesse stated he is going to have to stick with what the Planning Commission is leaning towards since he does not have enough information. Landgraver stated the Planning Commission has been attempting to enforce the rules and that the current process appears to be working. Landgraver stated he cannot support bumping up the structural coverage 33 or 36 percent or eliminating it completely. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3896, City of Orono, Text Amendment: Structural Coverage, with the changes that were discussed by the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 8 of 8 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: February 21, 2017 Subject: #17-3896, City of Orono Text Amendment: Structural Coverage Public Hearing Council Exhibit D 17-3896 Application Summary: The proposed ordinance would amend the structural coverage regulation as it is applied throughout the city of Orono. Structural coverage is a regulation of massing, and the desire is to minimize or eliminate redundant regulations. Staff Recommendation: If massing is an important characteristic, staff recommends adoption of Ordinance noted as Exhibit B. Background The issue of structural coverage was tied for number 2 on the list of ordinances prioritized by the Planning Commission and City Council last fall. Originally, the issue was an examination of what is calculated, and what isn't. The City Council has since suggested changes including elimination of the structural coverage limitation. The draft ordinance, Exhibit A, does that. In 2016, Structural coverage was the subject of 4 variances, of the 41 variances reviewed. Structural Coverage is a limitation intended to address massing, the effect of a structure or structures on a lot, and its impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The greater the mass, often the more visual impact the structure has on the neighborhood. Structural coverage is currently based on the size of the lot, up to 2 acres. Lots 10,000 sq ft to 2 acres are allowed 15% structural coverage. Lots more than 2 acres have no structural coverage limitation, and lots less than 10,000 sq ft are allowed 1500 sq ft. Hardcover limitations, intended to address stormwater quality issues, is based on the lots' proximity to the lake or lake tributary. There is concern that the structural and hardcover limitations work to create a redundant level of regulation; in fact, they regulate for different goals. An alternative to striking the structural coverage is provided in Exhibit B. This draft alters what is included in the structural coverage calculation and raises the maximum from 15% to 20%. Basically, roofed structures would be counted, but decks, regardless of height would not be. This still regulates massing, but eases the burdens on many lots. The 4 variances that considered structural coverage relief did not exceed 20% hard cover. FILE #17-3896 February 21, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received based on this application, though comments for other variances refer to the impact of the usually larger structure on the lot. Issues for Consideration 1. Is the regulation of massing still important in Orono? 2. Can reasonable modifications to those regulations be made without negatively impacting the goals of those regulations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Ordinance eliminating structural coverage Exhibit B. Ordinance modifying structural coverage Exhibit C. Examples of lots requested structural coverage variances in 2016. AGENDAITEM Item No.: 15 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: City of Orono Text Amendment: Special Events Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. Approval of the draft ordinance would change how special events are regulated within the City. 2. Background. Private events seem to raise as an issue when their frequency, traffic, or noise impacts the neighborhood. The main issue may be summarized by trying to define what is an "occasional private party", which is otherwise excepted by the City Code from requiring a permit. The draft ordinance adjusts the definitions of private and special events, and attempts to differentiate between an occasional private party and one that is more impactful to neighborhoods. The ordinance allows a property to have 3 private events a year without a permit from the city. The 4 1h event would require issuance of a permit. In practice, the city would know about a private event only if complaints were received, or the property owner self -reports. Ordinances including those regulating parking, noise, and appearance of the property remain, protecting neighborhoods from the occasional disruptive event. 3. Public Comments. Staff has received two emails regarding the ordinance, attached as Exhibit C. There were no people to speak at the public hearing hosted by the Planning Commission. Staff is aware that community interest is growing, and it is anticipated that additional public comment will be provided at the Council meeting. 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission discussed the ordinance at their meeting on February 21, 2017. During the Planning Commission, there were questions related to the issuance of permits. Special Event permits are reviewed by the clerk and Police Chief, and are issued by the clerk's office. There is no public hearing, nor do the permits go to the City Council. The Commission recommended approval of the ordinance as presented 6-0. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Ordinance amending regulations related to Special and Private Events as drafted. List of Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance B. Planning Commission Minutes Draft C. Public Comments D. Planning Commission staff report E. Summary of differences List of References A. Planning Commission packet dated February 21, 2017 Prepared By: J. Bamhart Reviewed By: Approved By: NZ Council Exhibit A ORDINANCE NO. THIRD SERIES 17-3897 CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING SPECIAL EVENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 66-191 shall be amended by adding text to read as follows: Sec. 66-191. - Definitions Private event. Any event in a residentially zoned district that is intended or likely to draw crowds, noise, or traffic beyond the normal use of the land use designation. Private events ma include. but are not limited to: festivals. Darties of anv tVDe. music and theater recitals or shows. Special event means any maratheR run/ walk of any length, block party, fishing contest, parachute jump, hot-air balloon event, carnival, open house held as part of a home tour, or any other activity or event open to the public which in some way impedes or affects the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off the site at any one time on residential streets, not including a public access to Lake Minnetonka, or requires the posting of no parking signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and regulations. Private events that impede or affects the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off the site at anv one time on residential streets. not includina a Dublic access to Lake Minnetonka. or requires the posting of no parking signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and_ regulations are considered a special event. These may include estate sales. SECTION 2. Section 66-222 shall be amended by adding text to read as follows: Sec. 66-222. - Exceptions. The following are not required to apply for permits under this division: (1) Funeral processions; (2) A governmental agency acting within the scope of its functions; (3) An occasional private party that is held on private residential lots that does not require special service from a city department. A property hosting four or more Private Events per calendar year shall obtain a permit as required in Section 66-221. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of _, 2017 on a vote of — ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 12017. Council MINUTES OF THE Exhibit B ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION 17-3897 Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. U. #17-3897 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: SPECIAL EVENTS, 9:44 P.M. — 9:58 P.M. Barnhart stated special event issue was the highest priority item identified by the Planning Commission and City Council last fall. The City is attempting to develop an ordinance that balances flexibility with residents using their property in a more intense manner occasionally versus those that do it more frequently to the detriment of the neighborhood. The City would also like to avoid people needing to get a permit or obtain permission to hold a special birthday party or other similar event. Staff has attempted to draft an ordinance that would accomplish those goals. As part of the ordinance, definitions of private event and special event have been modified from what existed previously, Staff tried to establish a process for how frequently private or special events would be allowed in the community, and an avenue has been created to allow someone to obtain a permit in the event one is needed. Exceptions include funeral processions, a government agency acting within the scope of its functions, and an occasional party that does not require special service from a city department. Barnhart noted the following language was added to the exceptions: "A property hosting four or more private events per calendar year shall obtain a permit as required in Section 66-22 L" Under this language, a residential property may hold three private events per calendar year without the need for a permit. The fourth event would require a permit. Special event regulations are intended to allow flexibility for certain events that are important to community health while managing the impact they may have on the neighborhood. The regulations generally associated with special and private event impacts include traffic, noise, and parking. From October, 2015, to December, 2016, the City issued 89 special event permits covering races, home tours, and live music. Barnhart stated the City had quite a bit of special event permits issued throughout the year, with those permits typically being reviewed by the police chief and city clerk prior to approval. Barnhart stated it was Staff s intent to allow those to continue but that one of the objectives was to place a limit on the number of private events due to the impact on the residential neighborhoods. Page 1 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission should be aware that there is an important distinction between private event and special event. A special event is typically open to the public and a private event is the use of someone's private home. Lemke asked why funeral processions are exempt. Barnhart stated they often use public streets, require police escorts, and generally are not planned that far in advance to obtain City Council approval. Landgraver stated he appreciates the effort of Staff to look at these text amendments and that this ordinance will provide more tools for enforcement. Landgraver stated the City cannot anticipate every situation but that in his view this is close to the target. Schoenzeit asked what the permit approval process is. Barnhart indicated there is a review process outlined in Section 66-223, which describes what is required on the application, and Section 66-225 talks about how the City can deny a permit. Schoenzeit asked if there is some delay in getting a pen -nit. Barnhart indicated the permits are approved by the City Council. Barnhart noted permits will automatically be denied if the request is not received 14 days prior to the event being held. Barnhart indicated that is because there must be notice provided to residents within 350 feet at least ten days prior to the special event. Barnhart noted that would not apply to private events. Under the draft ordinance, residents would be allowed to hold three private events with the fourth one requiring a permit. Schoenzeit asked if Item No. 3 in 66-225 applies to all city ordinances or just zoning. Barnhart indicated it wouldjust be zoning. Schoenzeit asked if that will be changed with this ordinance. Page 2 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated that is not proposed to be changed. Thiesse commented that seems odd and that technically it would be all ordinances. Barnhart stated some events are held in the event and have live music. Those events in theory would violate city ordinances and would need special City permission. In addition, launching fireworks is against city ordinance unless a permit is obtained. Schoenzeit asked if there is any provision in the event a request for a special event permit has been previously denied that would force it to go to the City Council. Schoenzeit stated Staff cannot approve a special event permit and it must go before the City Council. Schoenzeit asked if there would be a public hearing in connection with that permit. Barnhart stated typically there are not public hearings on special event permits but that notice is provided to the residents located within 350 feet of the event. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9:56 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:56 p.m. Lemke moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3897, City of Orono, Text Amendment: Special Events. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 3 of 3 Council Exhibit C 17-3897 From: John Culliton To: Jeremy Barnha Subject: Private event ordinance proposal Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:30:52 PM Dear Mr. Banhart: I am a long time Orono resident, and I was caught off guard by the proposed ordinance which includes the following: A property hosting four or more private events per calendar year shall obtain a permit as required in section 66-221. On face value, this appears to be an incredible overreach of government into people's private lives. It challenges the fundamental constitutional right to "assemble peaceably" and threatens privacy rights which would prevent government from evaluating and numerating what takes place legally in your home. In attempt to define "private events," you list several definitions including the broad term "...parties of any type." But you also list "exceptions" saying, "...an occasional private party that is held on a private residential lot that does not require special service from a city department." That means, if passed, the city of Orono will define what "parties" are and define what "occasional" means. That has the potential to be a major government infringement on personal lives. In the ordinance's current state, could the following occur? A person hosting a big graduation party, a church bible study, and a political fundraiser in the same year (totaling three) would then have to go the city of Orono for a permit to host a Christmas party for his/her co-workers; and employees. And --the permit, by its nature, could be rejected. The number four seems random. If one private event is too disruptive, that's one too many. But if multiple events (beyond four) are not disruptive, then who's business is it to count? More questions: Who monitors the number of events a person has? And does someone come on your property to assess what kind of event you're having and how big it is? That would be a significant privacy concern. The whole things seems antithetical to why people live in a place like Orono --quiet, private, and one might even say "anonymous." Nobody really wants to know other people's business as long as they don't bother anyone. I'm hard pressed to believe this is the "highest priority" of the planning commission. May I ask for your help understanding this --including what the motivation to be so urgent to dictate what transpires at Orono residents' homes? Thank you. Respectfully, John Culliton From: Schmitt, Doug -10 To: Jeremy Barnha Subject: Party law Date: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 7:40:13 AM Dear Councilman Barnhart, Since I can't attend the next meeting, I'm writing to you to in regards to the proposed Three Party Law. I think it's a ridiculous waste of our local government's time and money to attempt to regulate all the private parties that happen in Orono. Why would anyone care how many parties happen? Parties are to enjoy life with those that we care about the most. I understand if a party disrupts neighbors or causes dangerous traffic issues, but it seems that the police can handle those complaints. Please don't waste our resources trying to count and bust up wonderful parties that happen throughout Orono every day. Sincerely, Doug Schmitt 1475 Shoreline Drive Orono,55391 612-670-0809 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: February 21, 2017 Subject: #17-3897, City of Orono, Text Amendment: Special Events Public Hearing Item 11 Application Summary: The draft ordinance amends the regulations for special and private events throughout the city of Orono. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. Background The issue of special events was the highest priority item highlighted by the Planning Commission and City Council last fall. Special event regulation is intended to allow flexibility for certain events that are important for community health and vibrancy while managing the impact they may have on the neighborhood. The regulatable issues generally associated with special and private event impacts include traffic, noise, parking. Recently, it was noted that the frequency of these events compounded any negative impact. Between October, 2015 and December 2016, the City issued 89 special event permits, including permits for races (23), home tours (23) and live music (7). The goal with the amended regulation is to allow residents to have occasional parties, , including those with live music, for graduations, weddings, private fundraisers, and private reasons, without onerous permitting processes, while protecting neighborhoods from frequent, impactful events. The Draft Ordinance amends the definition of Private Event and Special Event. A residential property may house 3 private events per calendar year without the need for a permit. The fourth event would require a permit. The permitting requirements would remain the same, and are illustrated in section 66-121. Some events require a license, as illustrated in Chapter 38. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. Permitting requirements Exhibit C. Licensing requirements Council Exhibit E Summary of Differences Existing and proposed regulation Existing Ordinance Private event means any private function or special event that exceeds normal levels of city public service and requires special service from city departments and/or mutual -aid agreements. Definitions: Special event means any marathon run, block party, fishing contest, parachute jump, hot-air balloon event, carnival, open house held as part of a home tour, or any other activity or event which in some way impedes or affects the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off the site at any one time on residential streets, not including a public access to Lake Minnetonka, or requires the posting of no parking signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and regulations. Sec. 66-221. - Required. A permit shall be obtained from the city by any person who will be holding or sponsoring a parade, private event or special event. The permit requirements set forth in chapter 38, article V, apply in addition to all licensing requirements. Sec. 66-222. - Exceptions. The following are not required to apply for permits under this division: 1. Funeral processions; 2. A governmental agency acting within the scope of its functions; 3. An occasional private party that is held on private residential lots that does not require special service from a city department. Proposed Ordinance Private event. Any event in a residentially zoned district that is intended or likely to draw crowds, noise, or traffic beyond the normal use of the land use designation. Private events may include, but are not limited to: festivals, parties of any type, music and theater recitals or shows. Special event means any run/ walk of any length, block party, fishing contest, parachute jump, hot-air balloon event, carnival, open house held as part of a home tour ' or any other activity or event open to the public which in some way impedes or affects the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off the site at any one time on residential streets, not including a public access to Lake Minnetonka, or requires the posting of no parking signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and regulations. Private events that impede or affects the free and unobstructed flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, generates parking needs for more than 20 vehicles off the site at any one time on residential streets, not including a public access to Lake Minnetonka, or requires the posting of no parking signs to maintain compliance with traffic laws and regulations are considered a special event. These may include estate sales. Sec. 66-221. - Required. A permit shall be obtained from the city by any person who will be holding or sponsoring a parade, private event or special event. The permit requirements set forth in chapter 38, article V, apply in addition to all licensing requirements. Same Same Clarifys "occasionaly Prvate Party" to 3 per Calendar year AGENDAITEM Item No.: 16 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Comprehensive Plan Community Committees Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to establish a committee to review and recommend changes to the comprehensive plan. 2. Background. At the Council meeting on February 13, 2017, the Council authorized staff to advertise for residents, park, and planning commissioners to serve as a project advisory committee (PAC). The park and planning commissions were approached for volunteers, and an advertisement was posted on the city webpage. The committee is to meet periodically to discuss direction of the comprehensive plan, suggest changes, or issues that need to be addressed. The committee would review these changes in advance of publication to the wider resident population. To date, the city has received interest from 7 residents and 2 Planning Commissioners, and 3 park commissioners. If one of the Park Commissioners is an alternate, and assuming two Council members, the committee would stand at 13 members, the absolute maximum supported by staff to remain an efficient committee. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Council appoint the members as listed in the attached exhibit A, including two Council Members. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to appoint members to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Project Advisory Committee as listed in the attached Exhibit, revised to include Councilmembers. Exhibits Exhibit A. Committee member roster Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R Project Advisory Committee Roster I Jennifer Smiley Resident 2 Meg Cowden Resident 3 Chad Olson Planning Commission 4 Candice Nadler Resident 5 PaulPesek Park Commission 6 Jon Schwingler Planning Commisison 7 Bob Erickson Resident 8 Dennis Libby Resident 9 Phil Lusardi Resident 10 Troy Swanson Resident 11 Jan Berg Park Commission Rick Meyers Park Commission (Alternate) 12 Councilmember 13 Councilmember AGENDAITEM Item No.: 17 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: City Planner Recruitment Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to proceed with the recruitment of a planner to replace Senior Planner Mike Gaffron. 2. Background. Senior Planner Mike Gaffron announced his retirement, effective May 31, 2017. To meet the customer service goals, and to manage the planning workload, this or a similar position must be filled. Rather than replace with a senior planner, Staff recommends hiring a City Planner, reducing the pay grade from Step 12 to Step 11. Senior Planner Gaffron on currently completes the review of subdivisions, more complex land use cases, and responds to citizen inquiries. The current city planner reviews building permits, land use cases, and is a resource for resident and contractor questions. The two planners would complete land use review, building permit review, citizen inquiries, and code enforcement. The Community Development Director would handle more complex land use cases, personnel management, code enforcement support, and special assigninents from the Council. 3. Cost. A comparison in the salaries of the city planner versus the senior planner: 4. Funding. The salary and benefits for the proposed planner position are included in the 2017 budget. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends authorization to advertise to fill a city planner vacancy. With authorization, it is hoped that the new planner would be on board mid-May. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the recruitment of a city planner. Exhibits A. City Planner Job Description Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: NZ Low High Senior Planner Grade 12 $64,523.00 $89,600.00 City Planner (hiring range) Grade 11 $60,651.00 $75,000.00 4. Funding. The salary and benefits for the proposed planner position are included in the 2017 budget. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends authorization to advertise to fill a city planner vacancy. With authorization, it is hoped that the new planner would be on board mid-May. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the recruitment of a city planner. Exhibits A. City Planner Job Description Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: NZ Position Title: Document Date Department: Accountable to: FLSA Status: Nature of Work CITY OF ORONO City Planner January 1, 2016 Planning & Building Community Development Director Exempt Administers City zoning ordinances, land use controls and provides planning assistance to the Planning Commission and City Council. Supervision Received and Exercised The City Planner reports to the Community Development Director. This position is not responsible for supervising other positions, however, the City Planner may guide the work of the Planning Assistant. Examples of Work Essential functions listed below are intended as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position. • Performs comprehensive reviews of complex variance, conditional use permit, subdivision, PUD, and other land use applications. Prepares reports and makes presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council on land use applications. Provides follow-up to applications including written and verbal communication with applicants, developers, engineers, architects, attorneys, realtors, etc. Drafts resolutions for adoption by City Council. • Assists in the implementation of the City's conservation design requirements. • Provides information to the public on all aspects of City planning and zoning ordinances relating to residential and commercial development. • Identifies and develops amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Codes as required, and prepares reports and drafts ordinances for adoption by the City Council. The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer • Responsible for implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and other long-range planning documents in a manner consistent with City policies. • Conducts and coordinates planning studies and projects. May be assigned to special projects in the Planning area as the need arises. • Monitors activities of state, regional and local agencies and organizations and participates when appropriate in preparation of policies which affect local decision making. • Represents City on task forces, committees, or meetings involving planning issues. Contacts may include Federal, State, regional and local agencies as well as adjacent municipalities. • Researches zoning and planning issues as needed to provide information requested by the public, other agencies, City Council or City staff. • Use of Geographical Information Systems in land use and planning applications. • Code enforcement activity as necessary. Required Knowlefte, Skills and Abilities Knowledge: • English Language — Knowledge of the structure and content of the English language including the meaning and spelling of words, rules of composition, and grammar. • Law and Government — Knowledge of laws, legal codes, court procedures, precedents, government regulations, executive orders, agency rules, and the democratic political process. • Geography — Knowledge of principles and methods for describing the features of land, sea, and air masses, including their physical characteristics, locations, interrelationships, and distribution of plant, animal, and human life. • Communications and Media — Knowledge of media production, communication, and dissemination techniques and methods. This includes alternative ways to inform and entertain via written, oral, and visual media. Skills: • Active Listening — Give full attention to what other people are saying, taking time to understand the points being made, asking questions as appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times. • Reading Comprehension — Understand written sentences and paragraphs in work related documents. • Critical Thinking — Use logic and reasoning to identify the strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions or approaches to problems. • Judgment and Decision Making — Consider the relative costs and benefits of potential actions to choose the most appropriate one. • Speaking — Talk to others to convey information effectively. The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer Abilities: • Oral Expression — Able to communicate information and ideas in speaking so others will understand. • Oral Comprehension — Able to listen to and understand information and ideas presented through spoken words and sentences. • Written Comprehension — Able to read and understand information and ideas presented in writing. • Written Expression — Able to communicate information and ideas in writing so others will understand. • Deductive Reasoning — Able to apply general rules to specific problems to produce answers that make sense. Minimum Requirements • Bachelor's Degree in Land Use/Community Planning, Resource Management or a related field. • Two (2) years of related experience. Desirable Oualifications 0 Two (2) years of related experience in a municipal setting. Physical Demands and Working Environment This position operates in an office environment, where employees are protected from weather conditions or contaminants, but not necessarily occasional temperature changes. The City of Orono is an Equal Opportunity Employer AGENDAITEM Item No.: 18 Date: Item Description : Resolution of Appreciation to Jessica Loftus Presenter Mayor Walsh Agenda Mayor/ Council Section: Report 1. Purpose. To recognize Jessica Loftus for her services to the City of Orono. 2. Background. Jessica Loftus provided dedicated services to the City of Orono as City Administrator from April of 2010 to March of 2017. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution of Appreciation to Jessica Loftus For More Than 6 Years of Dedicated Service to the City of Orono. Exhibits A. Resolution of Appreciation to Jessica Loftus Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO JESSICA LOFTUS FOR MORE THAN 6 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Jessica Loftus has served the City of Orono since April 2010 as City Administrator; and WHEREAS, Jessica's years with the City have been marked by a strong commitment and outstanding dedication to the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, Jessica has earned both the respect and friendship of those in her profession as well as her co-workers; and WHEREAS, Jessica has provided excellent leadership in promoting cohesiveness and coordination between and among the various City departments; and WHEREAS, during Jessica's tenure she was key in implementing a variety of improvements in City services, including the expansion of police services and facilities, and renovation of the administrative offices; and WHEREAS, Jessica has resigned from her position with the City in order to pursue other interests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Jessica Loftus for her dedicated service to the City, and does highly commend her for the manner in which she has carried out her duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby extend to Jessica its best wishes for success in her future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13th day of March, 2017. ATTEST: Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDAITEM Item No.: 4 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Fox Street Rehabilitation- Approval to Solicit Bids Presenter: Adam Edwards Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to update the Council on the design, presented by Bolton and Menk, for Fox Street and authorize the solicitation of bids for the project. 2. Background. On August 8, 2016 Bolton & Menk presented a feasibility study for the reconstruction of Fox Street. The study consists of an analysis of the existing conditions, topographic surveying of the project area and development of courses of action to repair, replace and improve the street. On September 12, 2016 the Council approved the engineering and design for sections between Old Crystal Bay Rd. and Brown Road. 3. Scope of Work. The project will consist of the reclamation of the bituminous pavement, select subgrade corrections, and the replacement/improvement of the associated stormwater system between Old Crystal Bay Rd. and Brown Road. 4. Cost. The estimated cost for the project is $ 1,150,643. 5. Funding. The section from Willow Drive to Brown Road is eligible for municipal state aid (MSA) funds. The section from Old Crystal Bay Rd. to Willow Drive will be funded from the Pavement fund and Stormwater fund. Fund Total CIP Amount Est. Fund Balance EOY 2017 MSA construction $489,982 $643,545 $585,968 Pavement Fund $617,604 $735,413 $ 137,596 * Storm Water Fund $43,057 $ 60,000 $ 1,453,394 Total $ 1,150,643 * Balance based on Fox Street only 6. Timing. Normally we attempt to schedule larger road projects during the school break period (Jun - Sep) by establishing a substantially complete date of September I st. One resident has requested that this project be completed earlier. The council could direct a substantially complete date of August Pt if so desired. Advertise for Bids .................................................................................................. March, 2017 OpenBids/Award .................................................................................................... April, 2017 Construction .................................................................................. Summer 2017 7. Staff Recommendation. I recommend the council approve the plans and authorize staff to solicit bids. Further the council should decide if and earlier finish date should be added to the contract. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Move to authorize the solicitation of Bids for the project and establish a substantially complete date for the project of either August 4 th or September Pt. Exhibits A. Design Excerpt (Complete Design packet available upon request) Prepared By - Reviewed By: References A. Fox Street Feasibility Study, August 13, 2016 Approved By: D5R DATE STATE PROJ. NO. S.A.P. 152-105-002 FROM 10+00.00 TO 34+53.78 GROSS LENGTH 2453.78 FEET 0.465 MILES BRIDGES -LENGTH FEET MILES EXCEPTIONS -LENGTH FEET MILES NET LENGTH 2453.78 FEET 0.465 MILES CITY PROJECT FROM 100+67.34 TO 129+28.81 GROSS LENGTH 2861.47 FEET 0.542 MILES BRIDGES -LENGTH FEET MILES EXCEPTIONS -LENGTH FEET MILES NET LENGTH 2861.47 FEET 0.542 MILES NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." INDEX MAP 01 '800, ADT (Current Year) (2017) = 1820 01 100, GENERAL LAYOUT 3.6 1 PLAN 0., 0. NO. OF TRAFFIC LANES OL H. ff L___ '�O' PROFILE STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS 1.06 EARTHWORK SUMMARY & TABULATIONS OL_ VLRT�S' QUANTITY TABULATIONS KI 11.1— & M,l,k, — 2017, All Righl� R--d 1.10 H :\ORNO\Cl3llO828\�D\C3D\110828�L.dwg 2/21/2017 1:34 PM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT RECONDITIONING, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CULVERTS S.A.P. 152-105-002 LOCATED ON FOX STREET FROM WILLOW DRIVE S TO BROWN ROAD S CITY PROJECT LOCATED ON FOX STREET FROM S OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD TO WILLOW DRIVE S DESIGN DESIGNATION ESALS(20) = 239,000 ADT (Current Year) (2017) = 1820 ADT (Future Year) (2037) = 2180 T (Heavy Commercial) = 3.6 SHOULDER WIDTH (FT.) 1 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION LOCAL NO. OF TRAFFIC LANES 2 NO. OF PARKING LANES 0 Ton Design 9 TON R VALUE 12 Design Speed 35 MPH % Based on Stopping Sight Distance Height of eye 35 Height of object 2.0' Design Speed not achieved at: N/A CTPROJECT LOCATION C COUNTY: HENNEPIN DISTRICT: METRO PROJECT DATUM: HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATES HORIZONTAL: NAD 83 (1986 ADJ) SHEET DESCRIPTION VERTICAL: NAVD88 SECTION 1: GENERAL 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 101 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT & MENK Iho,e: 1912) 118-81118 Email: haska@bolton-menk.com 1 . 04 wCww.boIton-menk.com S.A.P. NO. 152-105-002 STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS MINN. PROJ. NO. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFICATIONS AND THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DE PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. SECTION 1: GENERAL TITLE SHEET 101 LEGEND 1�02 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT 1. 03 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1 . 04 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.05 STANDARD PLATES & INDEX OF TABULATIONS 1.06 EARTHWORK SUMMARY & TABULATIONS 1.07 QUANTITY TABULATIONS 1.08-1.09 TYPICAL SECTIONS 1.10 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1.11-1.12 SECTION 2: RIGHT OF WAY & ALIGNMENT PLANS ALIGNMENT TABULATIONS 2.01 SECTION 3: STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL TABULATIONS & NARRATIVE 3.01 STAGING & TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 3.02 SECTION 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLANS EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN 4.01-4.05 SECTION 5: CONSTRUCTION PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLAN & PROFILE 5.01-5.10 SECTION 6: CULVERT PLANS CULVERT TABULATIONS 6.01 CULVERT PLAN 6.02-6.04 SECTION 7: EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS SWPPP PROJECT INFORMATION & LOCATION 7.01 SWPPP SITE & SOILS MAP 7.02 SWPPP NARRATIVE 7.03 EROSION CONTROL& TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN 7.04-7.08 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL 7.09-7.14 (THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 49 SHEETS) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINTNAME: DAVIDP.MARTINI LICENSE # 26122 DATE: 02/21/2017 SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 CITY OF ORONO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 HENNEPIN COUNTY: DIRECTOR, TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT & COUNTY ENGINEER RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 DISTRICT STATE AID ENGINEER REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AID RULES RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL 20 STATE AID ENGINEER APPROVED FOR STATE AID FUNDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FINAL FIELD REVISIONS, IF ANY, OF THIS PLAN WERE MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF M I IN IN ESOTA. LIC. NO. DATE: SHEET NO. 1.01 OF 49 <3> 0 0+( 0 j 10�+0011 + 01- 0 z Z'-6 0\3, <G> (3 xx <3> FOX STREE T ux +( --- ------- J 7 - h Lu < 0 L/) Lu cr 0 ,12S"6, 6 �-��'126+00 'S z 0 w EEI 7.6 <s> EEI <0> 7.08 <G> <3> uj > FOX STREET Ln 9 ---tn7� 2 + 0 0 '�7 hnZ 7 U7 0 ------------- +19 ---- -- ---- <0 71, 040 LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN CONSTRUCTION PLAN Z6.XX CULVERT PLAN <G> EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLAN 0 HORZ. 100 200 0 BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 P1one:'9S2),t18-8818 REV I—EDI.A W' IHEREB CEPTIFYTHATTHIS I -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY EVISIO ANDTFIAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER =EER UNDERTHEUMOFTH STATEOFMINNUOTA. SmA.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 1.03 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA I Right Re—d SCALE FEET & MENK Email: Chaska@bolton-menk com —..bolto—e�kxom DAVID P. MARTINI 26122 02/21/201 7 DPM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 49 GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT :,.RN.,C=2R D'�Al 2/21/2017 1259 PM ,D\110828GPL.d.g UC. NO. —E — YPE SID 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) YPE SID 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 3GREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) EXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) RADE PREPARATION 121121 IINCIDENTALI INSET A: NOT TO SCALE VARIES (TYP) VARIES (TYP) MATCH EXISTING. 11'THRU LANE 11'THRU LANE VIVIIN. BLVD AT 2% SEE PLANS FOR 3.0" TYPE SID 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) AREAS WITH CURB OR B1012 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) /-B612 CONCRETE CURB 01 22' -0 (SEE PLANS) PLAN VIEW Q 10+00 - 34+54 VARIES 2 3.-j NOT TO SCALE 4-14 @ GUARDRAIL 2 INSET A REV I—ED FDA Z U 0 FOX STREET DESIG�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj EET TYPICAL SECTION 1 f1fl. C-7 I 'Ir%. '10 01 VGRAVEL SHOULDER C, u NOT TO SCALE 22' 0 3.0" TYPE SID 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) FOX STREET 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) LD M 01 22' -0 @SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. PLAN VIEW VARIES (TYP) rL VARIES (TYP) I VGRAVEL SHOULDER C, 11'THRU LANE 11'THRU LANE 0 1 ES 1'(MIN.) GRAVEL SHOULDER J n 2.0" TYPE SID 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) 1 �INSETA 3.0" TYPE SID 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) FOX STREET 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) INSET A FOX STREET WITH GUARDRAIL TYPICAL SECTION @SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 10+00 - 34+54 INSET A: NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE @ GUARDRAIL 22' REV I—ED FDA Z U 0 IHERE YCE IFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT VVAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY RECT UPERVIESIO AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO R THELRVAOFTH STATFOFMINNESOTA. I THE IVIS DESIG�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj EET VGRAVEL SHOULDER CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON 0111 VGRAVEL SHOULDER 1.1so NOTE: DETAILS ARE NOT TO SCALE & MENK Phone: (9-12,4411-811111 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com AK� CHIECRED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF _ Iwo 22' -0 1 @,Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Resern,d PLAN VIEW 26122 02/21/2017 I DPM TYPICAL SECTIONS 49 VARIES (TYP) (L VARIES (TYP) 11'THRU LANE 11'THRU LANE 1'BLVD 7 EXISTING BITUMINOUS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD EXISTING SECTION NOT TO SCALE TYPE SID 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) TYPE SO 12.5 NON-WEAR:NG COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) TYPE SID 12.5 NON -WEAR NG COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) -6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) 'PROVEDSUBGRADE OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PROPOSED SECTION NOT TO SCALE E SID 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) (SPWEA240B) (2360) MEGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) ADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY NOT TO SCALE 3REGATE BASE CL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) tADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY SURFACING NOT TO SCALE 2.0�� TYPE SID 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) 3.0 TYPE SID 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B) (SPNWB330B) (2360) =17 — 10" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) NOTES: GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, IVINDOT TYPE 5 (3733) INSET A FOX STREET WITH GUARDRAIL @SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES AND TRANSITIONS. SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) INSET A: TYPICAL SECTION OTOPSOIL& HYDROSEED. (SEESECTION 7 FOR RESTORATION) NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE @ GUARDRAIL 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REV I—ED FDA DATE IHERE YCE IFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT VVAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY RECT UPERVIESIO AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO R THELRVAOFTH STATFOFMINNESOTA. I THE IVIS DESIG�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 jj EET ::::::::] CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON 0111 CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 1.1so NOTE: DETAILS ARE NOT TO SCALE & MENK Phone: (9-12,4411-811111 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com AK� CHIECRED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF _ DAVID P. MARTINI @,Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Resern,d --bolton-nnenk.com 26122 02/21/2017 I DPM TYPICAL SECTIONS 49 H \ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828WP.d,g 2/21/2017 1!17 PM Uc. NO. DATE DETOUR DETOUR 4m- dnO13O M DETOUR I" < STAGE 1: 0 < WORK AT FOX STREET. co Ln ACCESS ALONG WILLOW DRIVE S WILL REMAIN OPEN TO >- ---- THRU TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. of u 0 WORK AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE. THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE IS PERMITTED TO BE CLOSED FOR ONE DAY DURING WORKING HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SUBCUTTING, CULVERT INSTALLATION, AND PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE THROUGH THE INTERSECTION. ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON WILLOW DRIVE AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING THE INTERSECTION FOR DAYTIME WORK. p 'M M z ILL FOX STREET o. IIIIEST N Lu DETOUR eo I LS Z--TOU z Z' Ou + HEAD 0 HEAD DETOUR + FOX ST FOX ST EAST WEST IHEREB CERTIFY THAT THIS PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY -105-002 IIIIIHADIWLANE SLIT11110 UNIEIY RECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL D201NEE S.A.P. 152 SHEET My 0 300 600 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESC ��A UNDER THE — OF THE STATE OF MINNUOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 3.02 HORZ. Plone: (9-12,4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 11011,11 "1 2111 1 31,111 Re—, & MENK —bolto—e�kxom DAVID P. MARTINI O—ED .:'OR�.'C=2N�CA.'�Al 26122 02/21/2017 49 D\110828STG.dwg 2/21/2017 1:10 PM UC. NO. —E -I DPM TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN LEGEND PROJECT AREA DETOUR ROUTE < STAGE 1: 0 < WORK AT FOX STREET. co Ln ACCESS ALONG WILLOW DRIVE S WILL REMAIN OPEN TO >- ---- THRU TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. of u 0 WORK AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE. THE INTERSECTION OF FOX STREET AND WILLOW DRIVE IS PERMITTED TO BE CLOSED FOR ONE DAY DURING WORKING HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SUBCUTTING, CULVERT INSTALLATION, AND PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE THROUGH THE INTERSECTION. ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON WILLOW DRIVE AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING THE INTERSECTION FOR DAYTIME WORK. p 'M M z ILL FOX STREET o. IIIIEST N Lu DETOUR eo I LS Z--TOU z Z' Ou + HEAD 0 HEAD DETOUR + FOX ST FOX ST EAST WEST IHEREB CERTIFY THAT THIS PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY -105-002 IIIIIHADIWLANE SLIT11110 UNIEIY RECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL D201NEE S.A.P. 152 SHEET My 0 300 600 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESC ��A UNDER THE — OF THE STATE OF MINNUOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 3.02 HORZ. Plone: (9-12,4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 11011,11 "1 2111 1 31,111 Re—, & MENK —bolto—e�kxom DAVID P. MARTINI O—ED .:'OR�.'C=2N�CA.'�Al 26122 02/21/2017 49 D\110828STG.dwg 2/21/2017 1:10 PM UC. NO. —E -I DPM TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 0411723420004 0411723420005 LM & DE STUDBS PID: 0411723430011 0 E DRESSEL ET AL 2720 Fax St. T`o Minnetonka Alano Group Inc, 2740 Fox St. 2760 Fox St z zi LOT 23 LOT 22 = EM U LOT 24 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) FOX &,OLD CRYSTAL SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (T4) SAY ROAI�_ LARGE ROCK C B -WIRE LETO _X _X �*20" EITUMIN.IS _x _X "'o, X—x STOP -WIRE FENCE, X_ X -------------- 1b, B _X�� , BEGIN CITY PROJECT _X L STA 100+67.34 91 100+00 Q513_1 -------------- ----- ----- - ---- - 10i4FOO )6f 105+00 00 102+60 104+C CENTS FOX ST ( �TU CU C _U___ '-ENi 7BY LIN -Kr- —G— "Ok - OU 7 c .... tN� Ou < 1 2" U R -------- 5 41 966�* 66 'J, PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) < co _J STOP REMOVAL LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTALTO PIPE REMOVAL) REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVE BOULARDS 0 x U REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE Q REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 0_j SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) I A Ij VI REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) Co ca CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0411723420003 z z M j ACOBSON I 2690 Foy St. Z LOT 20 U 0 0 LOT 21 WATER FLOWING z< DO -FAST AT TIME OF < INVENTORY REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE 25.00 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) CB R _" N NN FR E, B -WIRE FEN E N (1'2') 948 76 - ---------- - - --- ----------- --------- -LARGE ROCK I NW (21") 949 52 4 LANDSCAPE ----------- -956--- LANDSCAPE ----- -- 'k, P1 (MULCH) q /A B SLIDER WALL q 8PUMINOUS 6 --- 950 — — — ------------- -- ---- ------------------------- ------- - -- --------- - --- --- ----------------- ----------- ------ — — — ------- --------- ------- ---- - --------- - ------------- --- Q) B-31 107+00" O�EOOE- FOX STREET -------- G It= ---- -- ----- - u --------- - -------- E -------- ------ ------ -- -- --------- 4� IOU IR LARGE ROCK / � '945- jo 95 D ---------------------- 9�2 �53 ---- -- 1'7 --- ----- -- -- --------------- BITUMINOUS ---------- GENERAL NOTES: -945 WETLAND --------- - 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM WELLAND < THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIM TS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BYTHE ENGINEER PRIIOR TO REMOVAL. -ua 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL < --------------------------- -------- WETLAND TO COMMON EXCAVATION. 0 U z 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED < 0 INCIDENTAL NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN U < 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 0411723430020 PIDU 0411723430003 J & W TUCKER D. TERRY THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL 650 Gander Rd. 2765 Fox St. D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE vo GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." REV I-EDI.F I -E IHEREB CEPTIFYTHATT 15 Plukh, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR DESIG�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIRECT UPERVIESION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER jj S.EET 0 20 40 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNDER THE — OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.01 HORZ. Phone: 9S2, 4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS C Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res—cl & MENK —boltor-nneak.com DAVID P. MARTINI OHECR H:\ORoNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.d,g 2/21/2017 1:26 PM S UC. NO. 26122 DATE 02/21/2017 Dp� EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN 49 u u u Cu E -CO ------------------ GRAVEL U D 7EC ORA E ----- ---- ---- ------- ------ ------- A 8" ------- 6" ------ 942-- "��WATCH FOR CHILDREN QUEST 6" 6" ------- P F S\ 93 RIVER CA -- *6`1� 10 10' WETILAND GRAVEL 4" 6" IV C�) "g., DECORAT]YE-t C- �2" X 2 /1011 X 5 PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP)," - - - - - -- /* *6" 4 LANDSCAPE 7' WETLAND REMOVAL LEGEND (RIVER ROCK) PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) — -- — -- — -- — -- 0 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT Q REMOVE BOULARDS < REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT Q SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER R !d. SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 0411723410005 M. & G. WENGLER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 2420 FOX ��T. M > CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) w 0 < SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) ------------ ------- WETLAND ---------------------- - --- ------ FO� -------- - - -------- CNU-Dae, SPLIT RAIL FENCE --- VVA" -------------- ------------ �A, -------- --- - ------ - - -- ------ 6" ------- ------------------------------- 9K g�j- - --�— ....... ------------------ W2 a� 4 --- -------------- - - --- --------------------------- ------ - - - - ------------- -------- -------------- _7� S --qj6 --117 ------ ---- R W, 23+00 7 ----------------------- ----- — - - - ----------- ---- G-- - CU — ---- 0 ou Ou— O"—� OU D C, Ou -95 ON Ou -F _ -r� --------------------------- - ------- ------------ ------------ ------- ----- — ------- --- --9,53 ---- -------------- ------ -------- .15 WETLAND --------- ---------------------------- E LIAN WETLAND FANCY MAILBOX POSTS ---------- Ou FLAT STONE *-12" W/ 12" WOOD 10- PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) D PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE GENERAL NOTES: 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM — -- — -- THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL > Oz�i 17234,�0002 TO COMMON EXCAVATION. j & S GRUDNOWSY1 0 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED Z 2555 Fox St INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON S INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. ISSUED FOR -E IFERE YCEPTIPYTHATT 15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR D-INED S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIRECT UPERVIS11 N AND TFIAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA SS318 LINIIATI-11-01TI-ISTATEOFMINNESOTA. DMWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.02 HORZ. Plone: (9-12, 4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res -d & MENK —bolton-irnenlk.com DAVID P. MARTINI -ECK 0 D --1 26122 02/21/2017 cl)p� EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN 49 H \ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.dg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UC. NO. I -E NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN N. LINE, H OF THE S 1/4 PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT C-) LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE < LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651 -454 -0007 -OT 2 Li US THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL 1 04117234100 0 z D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE i �ELO C K "STANDARD J.JOHNSON 2530 FOX ST. z 0 D 0 0 GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED GUIDELINES FOR T 1 COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." U X 0 Cn uj CONSTRUCTION LIMA (TYP) LL < < SALVAGE & REINSTALL BOULDER WALL WATER 9,0,- �j - ------- 6" ALL Mcws- , -9� W 01 ------------ -------------------- F" 4 011, I ------- ---- X: ----- 4 7' ------------------ 8" 2 - 20 22" ---------- ENOS93AI'li A ............. 22" 24" RnIJI DER \N u u Cu E -CO ------------------ GRAVEL U D 7EC ORA E ----- ---- ---- ------- ------ ------- A 8" ------- 6" ------ 942-- "��WATCH FOR CHILDREN QUEST 6" 6" ------- P F S\ 93 RIVER CA -- *6`1� 10 10' WETILAND GRAVEL 4" 6" IV C�) "g., DECORAT]YE-t C- �2" X 2 /1011 X 5 PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP)," - - - - - -- /* *6" 4 LANDSCAPE 7' WETLAND REMOVAL LEGEND (RIVER ROCK) PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) — -- — -- — -- — -- 0 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT Q REMOVE BOULARDS < REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT Q SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER R !d. SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 0411723410005 M. & G. WENGLER CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 2420 FOX ��T. M > CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) w 0 < SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) ------------ ------- WETLAND ---------------------- - --- ------ FO� -------- - - -------- CNU-Dae, SPLIT RAIL FENCE --- VVA" -------------- ------------ �A, -------- --- - ------ - - -- ------ 6" ------- ------------------------------- 9K g�j- - --�— ....... ------------------ W2 a� 4 --- -------------- - - --- --------------------------- ------ - - - - ------------- -------- -------------- _7� S --qj6 --117 ------ ---- R W, 23+00 7 ----------------------- ----- — - - - ----------- ---- G-- - CU — ---- 0 ou Ou— O"—� OU D C, Ou -95 ON Ou -F _ -r� --------------------------- - ------- ------------ ------------ ------- ----- — ------- --- --9,53 ---- -------------- ------ -------- .15 WETLAND --------- ---------------------------- E LIAN WETLAND FANCY MAILBOX POSTS ---------- Ou FLAT STONE *-12" W/ 12" WOOD 10- PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) D PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE GENERAL NOTES: 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM — -- — -- THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL > Oz�i 17234,�0002 TO COMMON EXCAVATION. j & S GRUDNOWSY1 0 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED Z 2555 Fox St INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON S INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. ISSUED FOR -E IFERE YCEPTIPYTHATT 15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR D-INED S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMYDIRECT UPERVIS11 N AND TFIAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA SS318 LINIIATI-11-01TI-ISTATEOFMINNESOTA. DMWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.02 HORZ. Plone: (9-12, 4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res -d & MENK —bolton-irnenlk.com DAVID P. MARTINI -ECK 0 D --1 26122 02/21/2017 cl)p� EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN 49 H \ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.dg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UC. NO. I -E ---------- Lu L 11vk ------- 0 1 1/ k -105-002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEGIN S.A.P. i52 - - - - - - - - STA 110+00.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - --9,2-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ ---- ------------ -RAP - - - - - - - - - A-------- - ----------- oow 14" CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 17-9 B ----- --------- -1�1 ----------- ---- -- Alp,------------ -- ----- 9 ----------------- - ----- --- 0, 4 Do 0 4" s, A 'osl� --- --- o - �-U ;194 --94 - D 24' _J ---- --------------- -------- END CITY PROJECT -- ---- STA 129+28.81 �2 64�60 -7� L 7�,344C)OC) I "o ,c 0RQN0 LOT 7 REMOVAL LEGEND ------------ ------------ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTALTO PIPE REMOVAL) ------------- ------ If 7-5 --------------------- --- --- ------ REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (D REMOVE BOULARDS REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (D SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN REMOVE TREE (D REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I BEGIN S.A.P. 152-105-002 STA 10+00.00 - - - - - - - - - SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEN, 4, /Nvk % w 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - v v1t 17) z G vv u ------------ -917 --------- c �t� ------- �c RIV, ---------- 3+00 ------------- -------- ------- 14+00 ----- --- -- 7!-4 L+60 w 57 ------ FOX ST 1p - ----- - REET,.----- - ------ TOP B- --------- A Q D r B f - - - --- 1, 1 - - - �- ou A G Z --' , -r�� -�� — 711-- 'Dof) posTs lr�l � 77 - G, - -------- -- ----- AVF1 ou -- --- ---- ---- %4�. 96, ---- je� VVD I VVILL -- --------- -J, - ---- --- -------- 947 oD WALL ,uu v -- -------- LL i7------------------------- u ---- -- - OLI --------------- ---------- cu - -------- - - ------- GENERAL NOTES: -------------------- ---- --- -- -------- ----------- 950 ---- - ------ 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. END CITY PROJECT TO COMMON EXCAVATION. STA 129+28.81 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN 15 UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL INCIDENTAL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE 0 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FORnTHE u INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA. m IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REV I-EDI.A DATE IHEREB CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY ME OR DE-�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDER MYDIRE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER jJ 0 20 40 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 NUERTRCIVVS FTHESTATEOFMNNFSOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.03 BOLTON P1 ne:,9-12,4411-811111 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Cohaska@bolton-menk.com --::::] Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res—d HORZ. & MENK —bolto—eitk.com DAVID P. MARTINI CHECR FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS o --1 � DATE P� 49 H \ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.dg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UC. NO. 26122 02/21/2017 D EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN < 2 SAWC BITUMINOUS (TYP) ------ --------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ j CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) '\_LA RSC BE -------- Z-1 lk 7 - -------------- D ---------- -- ---- -- QUEST ------------ 24 Y,6�2 EE I 1'r. C�E I ---------- --- ----------- C C� ON ---------- - C CENTE F�OIN7--' / w=M"1IEq ---------- F1--- ---- - ----- -- ------ ---- ef -------- --- --- -------- S ----------- ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 5 -- --- ----------- --------------------- ---- ------------------------------- -------- -- ---------- --- Ou— -- -------- - -- ------------- ou- 51 g� - ------ ------ ----- ---- --- - - - - - - so - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVAL LEGEND EX REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 0 REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTALTO PIPE REMOVAL) REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVE BOLLARDS 0 F- u = REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (D SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN 2 REMOVE TREE (D REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 0 RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 0 6 14* 1 T ------ 16� HI OP ------- Cu 12* lf-'-12" ----------- --------- -51 E9 21+00 22- 19+00 20+00 FOX!.: VIE E—R@W *L� 44@,�D— — — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE - - - - - - - - - LANDSCAPE (ROCK) --- ------- -------- - ---- ---------- -0[ EB U- 2 -GU 0 ou 011— OU-- OU BRICK SIGN COLUMN �E SPLIT RAIL FENC BRICK SIGN COLUMN IT R I ul) t L FENCE BRICK SIGN COLUMN ",CIPL K SON COLUMN < Lu 0 Lu NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (n BLIND INT. AHEAD ---------------- 41, ---949-_--94� ----- ------- 94S G T- 25+00 2 +00 27+00 5� F- u 4B-10 �93 -71- 0— / 17:— — -- 7941m'- 965 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- --------- ------------ -- ---- --------- -------------- ------ -------- ---- --- - ---- ------------ ---- -- ------------ -- ----- ------- 967-- -------------------- ---------- ------- -- - ------- : --- - ----------- ---------- - ------------ - ------ Ou Ou —K, 0 OU -1tL ou Ou— Ou 0 OU Ou 7 / 7' 1 PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: z CR 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM EE THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE 0 VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL < To COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REV DME HEIREB CERTIFY THAT THIS NAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY ME OR DESIGNED S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMY IRE SUPERVIS11 N AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 NO RTHEIAVVEOFTHESTATEOFMNNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.04 HORZ. Ilone:,9-12,4411-811311 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS C Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res—d & MENK —bolto—eink.com DAVID P. MARTINI c -ECR EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN H :\ORONO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.dg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UI NO. 26122 DOE 02/21/2017 Dp� 49 ZI 3: zi L, = 2 U HI LP 21+00 22- 19+00 20+00 FOX!.: VIE E—R@W *L� 44@,�D— — — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE - - - - - - - - - LANDSCAPE (ROCK) --- ------- -------- - ---- ---------- -0[ EB U- 2 -GU 0 ou 011— OU-- OU BRICK SIGN COLUMN �E SPLIT RAIL FENC BRICK SIGN COLUMN IT R I ul) t L FENCE BRICK SIGN COLUMN ",CIPL K SON COLUMN < Lu 0 Lu NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (n BLIND INT. AHEAD ---------------- 41, ---949-_--94� ----- ------- 94S G T- 25+00 2 +00 27+00 5� F- u 4B-10 �93 -71- 0— / 17:— — -- 7941m'- 965 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- --------- ------------ -- ---- --------- -------------- ------ -------- ---- --- - ---- ------------ ---- -- ------------ -- ----- ------- 967-- -------------------- ---------- ------- -- - ------- : --- - ----------- ---------- - ------------ - ------ Ou Ou —K, 0 OU -1tL ou Ou— Ou 0 OU Ou 7 / 7' 1 PROTECT POWER POLE (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: z CR 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM EE THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE 0 VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL < To COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON IS INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REV DME HEIREB CERTIFY THAT THIS NAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY ME OR DESIGNED S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDERMY IRE SUPERVIS11 N AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Aw 0 20 40 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 NO RTHEIAVVEOFTHESTATEOFMNNESOTA. DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 4.04 HORZ. Ilone:,9-12,4411-811311 AKM OF SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS C Bolt n & Menk, Inc. 2017, All Rights Res—d & MENK —bolto—eink.com DAVID P. MARTINI c -ECR EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN H :\ORONO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828REM.dg 2/21/2017 1:26 PM UI NO. 26122 DOE 02/21/2017 Dp� 49 — — — — — ---- — - ------- —S�6P AHEAG ------------ ----- ....... �L ------- - - --------------------- ----------- -------------- DU Ou REMOVAL LEGEND 0 20 40 HORZ. SCALE FEET "c,1.111 11 Fight ReSB-d .:,.RN.,c=2B C'�A ,D\110828REM.d.g 2/21/2017 1:26 PM REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT I-EDI.F -E I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS I`-, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY'DIRECTSUPERVISIO AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENCINEER UNDERTHEILN OFTHESTATEOFMINNBOTA. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT u REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT DAVID P. MARTINI UC. NO. 26122 -E 02/21/2017 z u < ------------- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) ------ — ------- --------- ------------ --- ou-- --DU u -- ------ --------- -- -- Ou --------- -------- - ---- ---- -------------------------------- -- ----------- ------ ---- - rd--C�NTERPOINT ---------- cl__ ----- --------- --------------- ---------- ----- — ----—� [r3o+Oo r7- 31 00 FOX STREET — — — — — ---- — - ------- —S�6P AHEAG ------------ ----- ....... �L ------- - - --------------------- ----------- -------------- DU Ou U` 0 Do )u ------------ - REMOVETREE SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS C; --- W—ET�ND 7��O—u-- - 11 DE, 32+00 rECT POWER POLE (TYP) - ------ --- ------ ---------------- T- qlt�--77,77� if� ---------------------------- - --- - - - - -- tL-11 --�, '- -01 WETLAND �� I �: (2) REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) Q REMOVE BOULARDS (D SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN (2) REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) - - - - - - 9JO- iVE7LAND -WET�AND ����GAS MARKER ----- U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 83+00 34+00 4ATION 'CAITION E�111ETE 'N 'S E DE 32+00 BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC-935.81� rCAUTI( WALL WETLAND I 'i or - - - - - - IJO -WffLANL: -WETLAND ,GAS MARKER OU—,11 1 6 VALL------------------- -,Jo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------- ---9j ------------ ------------------------------------------------ qj ------ �--, 1� . - U - ---------------------------------------- - CENTURY LINK 3 ALL------------------- - -- ----- ------ --:7- -93 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THESUBSURFACIE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." Ou -- ----------------- 35+19 BENCHMARK rUA 3 1 Mr—C 1 DISK IN CONC; 111TON --------------------- --�—.-M S-.A.P. 152-105-002 013-13 STA 34+53.78 --- ------------- -------- 77= ----- t�"` -4�F oo. CONCRETE ----- ---- SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) WING WALL L �- - - - - - - - ">ST -WEIL.ANLD . . . . WETLAND WETLAND GAS ��ER G— -- — -- WETLANS-�, ton CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: GA 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 0 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL cr- TO COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED 0 INCIDENTAL. u 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON S INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. REMOVAL LEGEND 0 20 40 HORZ. SCALE FEET "c,1.111 11 Fight ReSB-d .:,.RN.,c=2B C'�A ,D\110828REM.d.g 2/21/2017 1:26 PM REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT I-EDI.F -E I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS I`-, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY'DIRECTSUPERVISIO AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENCINEER UNDERTHEILN OFTHESTATEOFMINNBOTA. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT u REMOVE AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT U` 0 Do )u ------------ - REMOVETREE SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS C; --- W—ET�ND 7��O—u-- - 11 DE, 32+00 rECT POWER POLE (TYP) - ------ --- ------ ---------------- T- qlt�--77,77� if� ---------------------------- - --- - - - - -- tL-11 --�, '- -01 WETLAND �� I �: (2) REMOVE PIPE APRON (INCIDENTAL TO PIPE REMOVAL) Q REMOVE BOULARDS (D SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN (2) REMOVE BRUSH AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) - - - - - - 9JO- iVE7LAND -WET�AND ����GAS MARKER ----- U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 83+00 34+00 4ATION 'CAITION E�111ETE 'N 'S E DE 32+00 BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC-935.81� rCAUTI( WALL WETLAND I 'i or - - - - - - IJO -WffLANL: -WETLAND ,GAS MARKER OU—,11 1 6 VALL------------------- -,Jo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------- ---9j ------------ ------------------------------------------------ qj ------ �--, 1� . - U - ---------------------------------------- - CENTURY LINK 3 ALL------------------- - -- ----- ------ --:7- -93 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BYTHE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THESUBSURFACIE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." Ou -- ----------------- 35+19 BENCHMARK rUA 3 1 Mr—C 1 DISK IN CONC; 111TON --------------------- --�—.-M S-.A.P. 152-105-002 013-13 STA 34+53.78 --- ------------- -------- 77= ----- t�"` -4�F oo. CONCRETE ----- ---- SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP) WING WALL L �- - - - - - - - ">ST -WEIL.ANLD . . . . WETLAND WETLAND GAS ��ER G— -- — -- WETLANS-�, ton CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) GENERAL NOTES: GA 1. REMOVALS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM THE ENGINEER. REMOVAL LIMITS & REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 0 2. REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL cr- TO COMMON EXCAVATION. 3. PROTECTION OF ITEMS LABELED AS PROTECT SHALL BE CONSIDERED 0 INCIDENTAL. u 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE APRONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NCIDENTAL TO REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM). LENGTH OF APRON S INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH. 0 20 40 HORZ. SCALE FEET "c,1.111 11 Fight ReSB-d .:,.RN.,c=2B C'�A ,D\110828REM.d.g 2/21/2017 1:26 PM 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 11one: (9-12, 4411-811311 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com & MENK —bolto—e�kxom I-EDI.F -E I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS I`-, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY'DIRECTSUPERVISIO AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENCINEER UNDERTHEILN OFTHESTATEOFMINNBOTA. S.A.P. 152-105-002 DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA AKM FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS c -E. - P� D EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN SHEET 4.05 OF 49 DAVID P. MARTINI UC. NO. 26122 -E 02/21/2017 REMOVE PAVEMENT ON OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FROM FOX STREET TO f I 150' NORTH OF FOX STREET AS MARKED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. PAVEMENT THICKNESS VARIES FROM 6" TO 12", PATCH IN ACCORDANCE SUBDIVISION WITH THE DETAIL. AUDITOR'S I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 1 0411723420004 0411723420005 LM & DE STUDBS PID: 0411723430011 0 E DRESSEL ET AL 2720 Fox St. Minnetonka Alano Group Inc, 2740 Fox St. I of - 2760 Fox St� z z z 0 0 LOT 23 LOT 22 0 F- z I= (D Z .6 z 10 Do y 0 Z CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA z 5 � .6 + < + < It= Un z C' z e, )T 24 C, I < < C + + CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA z + 0 C51 � < A �: . , �p 8 3: z rn U z + Z REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS 3' BEHIND THE CURB Z 0 1\ FO &,OLD CRYSM� w ` 0 Do (D t,i Uu w Z A� - ED LARGE ROCK 3 SO Do CD Do 0 r, Cq z C -It LID B -WIRE FENCE 0 1*20" w ' BITUMINOUS 10 Oq IR + a, on �t 00 On ------- X 95 -[111E, CD P 10' GO I X--X—X BEGIN CITY PROJ CT GRAYEA, drol [I sq -- ---- STOP STA 100+67.34 D 0 -- -------- - ------ Do 013-1 61 1� 6 966 "IZ 106 F00 A 7 , �; —N X STREET io5,00 I N., 103+06 11 48 10C qp, 101�00 102 fil� 0 +DO ce, CENTS 0 G All. z C U -CII, -C L V�H 12 < C" Ou Ou ------- L L - ----------------- 2 4 X, -51 16" ---------- F 34 20' CIO Z Z M Z z STOP 0 - + 9 m '0 < Z § z — —— — —— — -- — -- CONSTRUCTION LEGEND w Ui z (D GENERAL NOTES: Z F - w w =i Ew >- 10 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS Z: 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. U rNOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE ROAD CROSS SLOPE I TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, NOTIFY CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X TOP OF FINISHED OPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GRADE ELEVATION —j ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. (D PROTECTTREE C /ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE (D INSTALL GUARDRAIL 0 PROTECT LANDSCAPING DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. SALVAGE BE REINSTALL RETAINING WALL C) B612 CURB & GUTTER INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN B1012 CURB BE GUTTER FOX STREET PROTECT MAILBOX PROTECT POWER POLE 980 980 (D RELOCATE MAILBOX RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) (D VP 10 LEV 3+5.,13 (D PROTECT DRIVEWAY GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER E 968 URVE LEN 5.00, PROTECT CULVERT 1. 1 END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL �i, 975 =T 975 UP 1. + >: > - W- 970 ILL! oL L� + V)l 106+36.53 970 I LtV CUR /E UEN=120. 0' 1ORD 4 CD 10 —P E=0.41' P� oui C3 ROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE > A, 0 . > + + On . .... . .... 965 1 . I I I I I I I I , , - I I >52 -, 0 —L---� 965 V > Ln % 150% + ILE 960 960 �,-EXISTING CENTERLINE PROF U .83% > 955 955 950 950 .. ... ..... . ....... .... .. . ..... ... ... ..... . ....... .... .. . ..... ... .. .... . .... .. .. .... 945 945 Do D DO 00 un M `LD w M Do Ln le, A A6 �—, 44i —, " +0,,,, # 0 0 7U- 01, X 2 CT! Lq Cq 01 O� .1 Lq 1P LqR 11� 11 `C! Uq 11 1 -il I � I — 'i. I I I — �F I 1 11 � I UK '0 w '61 1 U6 06 C) DO I` D Ln 0 C5 C5 D 10 'D 10 10 w 10 On. M On M. M M- 9 4 0 10 10 Ln ED 10 'D UO 10 10 'D 'D W 940 On Cn On M M On M M 0) M M M M1 MI 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 REV DATE IHERE YCEPTIFYTHATT 15 PLA,N, SPECIFI—ION, OR REPORT YVAS PREPARED BY ME OR DEEIG�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 UNDE MYDIRECT UPE VISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER jj 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 UNDERTHE-01TIA STATEOFMINNES— CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.01 HORZ. VERT. BOLTON Phone: (952) 448-8838 1N11RT111 OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS 91 3.1— & MRrk - 2017 All R,I R.—BE! & MENK —boltor-nnenk.com DAVID P. MARTINI CHECRED H:\ORNO\Cl3llOi2B�aD��3D\110828ALl.d.g 2/21/2017 1:30 PM 0 ---] UI NO, 26122 DATE 02/21/2017 - DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 N. LJNE, SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 229 < NUMBER u '0 0 11723420003 4j 0411723420001 ZEHNDER HOMES INC. nn 06 M ACOBSON oo 03 2660 Fox St. 2690 Fox St. SALVAGE & REINSTALL LANDSCAPING on cc c =) U REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UPTO 0 5 :S I 1 0 1 L' 0 LOT 21 z LOT 20 0 z TBEHIND THE CURB u 0 0 z z z a: u VIATF R FLOWING 0 FAST AT TIME OF z INVENTORY Z CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA 0z 0 < , DO + o: p F^ E u Do - 0- P, W DO Z a �z 0 (D �- -� LD 2 71 (D Z C) Z I E < - 1 1 co (�o I 0 z - Ua < 00 Z + z + G. + + a !� W_ `11, CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA < 0 M < < F + 0 u < + + cc + = 25,00 = 0 z --2 IW z co < REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO I < 0 t; Do E CURB z Lo z (12')q 876 nn DO z 4'BEHINDTH 13� 03 U, 6 --- Cli LA1131 ROCI < 5BJI (21 '1 � �2 zv 0 z 0 S -- ---- -WIRE FEN E 9 cz, --- ------ I LANDSCAPE on MULCIJJ -BJLJL� LERWILL /L (MULCH) (M Rpm INDUS 6" X 0) on X X EL w =Pt77�=D= -A— - -------------------- - --- 9- 106 K00 107+00 0 u 0 XCE z L MEDI 8+0b.ff—. ACOM_ -3 Q5B bw 1+00�_ 2±00 0 FOX ST REET x, ------------ dk 112 CENTERPOiNT1. GO M ------ L T-) -------------- ------------------- --------- D------------- ------ --- ---------------- T --------------LARGE ROCK ----- - RELOCATE MAILBOX/' I ------ uj < 7COP FROM EAXISLTAN6 PAVEMENT TO SfA �fMOV _C IMITS EXTEND UPTO TBEHINDTHE 110+§4 CURB WETLAND RUCTION LIMITS (TYP) < 0 MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS CR_ z" GENERAL NOTES: tz ------ c"_ - — - - — -- — -- CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. — -- — -- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS =A� am 2. INSTALLA4-INCH SOLID DOUBLEYELLOW (EPDXY) ONTHE NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY u CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. F- < 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. :E THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY --ap. 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY ROAD CROSS SLOPE TOP OF FINISHED ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. X GRADE ELEVATION 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PID. 0411723430003 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 111r.ERRY 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE 2765 Fox St� THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN 15 UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 PROTECTTREE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." (D INSTALL GUARDRAIL 0 PROTECT LANDSCAPING SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL C) B612 CURB & GUTTER V)l 106+36.53 vp lut-615.50 ILEV952.9Z EIEV950.32 ... FOX ST REET (D INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (D B1012 CURB & GUTTER CUR fE LEN=120_00' CURVE LEN=105.01)' Q PROTECT MAILBOX 0 PROTECT POWER POLE 970 E=0.41' E=0.20' (D RELOCATE MAILBOX 970 (D RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) VPI 108+72.00 ELEV 949.6p (D PROTECT DRIVEWAY GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 965 CI IRVE LEN=10 5.00' E=D.43- I . .. . .. . . .. PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL 965 VPi 109+92. 51 VPI � 11+56.50 ELEV 953.0 4� ELE'(944.68 URVE LEN=9!i;06' CURVE EN=140.00' 960 E=0.94� E:0.66' 960 In . .. . . .. . Un 01 U1 li� 't Ln DO i + I n n 0 LID 955 1> �PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE + Cn U1 on 01 ci "t 01 CA 01 + Ln, 2 . .. I .. 955 0+0 'MZ1 > -2.08M -2�08% 1 u > > 950 -0,50 u W > 950 EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE-/ CD 945 + 945 940 . . . . . . . . . . . 940 935 935 on DO U� C� M, , , I CD I r� Uo Lq T q Do .1 U� U, Y, q M ;i q Do `q Iq w 2 Lq on Lq on Iq 1. O� On I` Iq 11 N. 11 930 nn 6 ''1 U, Un Cn On M I On on C, On C` 6 on 6 0 C' On On Im I 1� On On On 1 61 On M- M di DO Im 66 1. on `0 ID Cg On �i Un On M L6 M On 930 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REY IMED FOR I -E IHEREB CERTIFY THAT UNDERMY IRE SUPERVISION NUER T C—OFTHESTATEOFMINNUOTA. THIS I`-, SPECIFICATION, AND THAT I AMA OR REPORT W� PREPARED BY ME OR DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DESIGNED Aw S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.02 HORZ. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com & MENK ZZ CHENED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI, 9) B,JU,n & MR,k, In,. 2017, AII R,ght, R ... -d —bolton-enk.com 2 122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 H:\ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828ALl.d.g 2/21/2017 1:30 PM UI NO, DATE El/4 N. LINE, SE 1/4 OF THE S NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY L— THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR C-) TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CAL 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. LOT 2 Ln THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 0411723410010 C_� REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO w MATCH EXISTING BITU MlINOUS THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUR�OGPF J.JOHNSON Z Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND TBEHIND THE CURB 25,30 FOX ST. 0 z D 0 DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." z ED D 2 z z u 0 It= 0 z .6 REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO z z L.L. C6 Z 0 F_ TBEHIND THE CURB Li C, < 00 0 P: ui u + D 00 + w co - E - �- (D -+ < � Z -6 cn -Z Z m L T z z E C' R z 25 j 3 H F + z < + z ID w + + < 0: I CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA � z + F - Z u z z D < U ---------- z z cm CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) < z 4 z , Z, ER WALL WATER 4" DH E EN X ---- -- P n-_ 22 --PIPE ENGS -FAli - — ----- T - — — — — — 1 17" 28"', 0" 22" 22" X 24" DE _u 12 DPE ----------- 12 UNDER RET WALLS t5 ---------- H HDPE - -------- _.k. (G B ----------- --------------- PE7 p 939.24: N 938.4/ e 0 > 1 I -E �-IDO _114+00g — 115±PQL 4p 1 �_00_ 113+00 (PRIVATE) 6+00 CENTEOPOINT ------------ R FOX 0 ____V �R 9 i 4.7 %, A] __ I STREET ;7-� 01 GENERAL NOTES: 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY, WIDT�S. 0411723410005 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON TH M. & G. WENGLER CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 2420 FOX ST 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON�THE P INS. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE RE rNTERSECTIONS. z > 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGII�JEER. > 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. Z + z > DO , :-5' 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINAING TIE 0 9 0 < > + RELO + CATION OF POWER POLES. --j > 0 SALVAGE & REINSTALL BRICK PAVERS Ro > + Z D, REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO A __I z + L� c L v �n M 2BEHI on > 00 2'BEHIND THE CURB Zo--------- INETLAND C) -------- - -- - - ------- -- SPLIT RAIL FENCE ------------------------ -- ------- ------ w8T CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 'HiLDR 0 -------------- ------ ------ r, ------------- -- - 7:--- LANIS" ---- -------- - - 4," - -- --- - -------- ---------- --------- ---------- -------------------- ----- . .......... - ----------------- ... FOX STREET -------------- - ------ — ----- G 0 :7777�--�!c Cu T ----- ou --- - - - - L OU (IM11- --------- ,'��'CE'TFRL --- ------ ---- ----------------- -- - -- ------- --- OU ----------------- ----- --- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- D ----- -- -------------- W -------- CRETE _0 I __ , I ---- 1 / — F (D _____FANC� SCARE L7 — -- -- ---------------------- ----- --- ---- WETLAND --- ----- ----------------- - __7 FLAT STUN L \NE—TLAND 12' MAILBOX Yq1 12' VVOOD POSTS 7� Ou *10" CONSTRUCTION LEGEND - MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ROAD CROSS SLOPE - -- - -- 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY F7 X = TOP OF FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION — ------- " 041172344�0062 NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 M 0 PROTECTTREE Z s GRUDNOINSKI St THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRAC TOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY 2555 FOX (D INSTALL GUARDRAIL 0 PROTECT LANDSCAPING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 6Sl-454-0002. Q SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL C) B612 CURB & GUTTER THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN 15 UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF (D INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (D B1012 CURB & GUTTER Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND G PROTECT MAILBOX (D PROTECT POWER POLE DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." (D RELOCATE MAILBOX STREET (D PROTECT DRIVEWAY RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 955 VpI 11 +99.91 PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT -TANGENT TERMINAL 955 ELEV940.98 CURVE LE N_�80.00' E=1581 VP[ 121 -69.80 VPI 119+62.21 �1,111. 1, ELEV..J_37.44. -inr . nn- . . VPI 124+07 FIFVq:tr 26 . . . 11 . 950 CURVE LEN�50.00'. .. . .... .. ... i=019' �(URVE I-EN"_1 ZO.00 LID E=0.26', E_0�20' 945 CE! Ch Ip on 945 OL > > U, M + DO U6 L6 wo , , + On > I I I I I I I I I M N, Ln + On > P'i on > + J, M 0) P1 `0 + Ch � 940 + . .. > , . ... I , I I . -PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE LH > 940 F- 0.92% -O�10% 935 935 EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE-/ 01 930 930 925 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 925 920 .. . .. . 920 . . . . . . . `q . . . . . . In Do I -q 9. . . . � � � �:' q . . . . �� � �: � �, O� . . Oq O� q cq . . . . . . . . 915' M C6 on cri On 6j I` Di 0-� 0) 16, 16 'C' 16 D On '0 UD T 16, 1. M MT� 01 'Zi AD M QD ii M U, AD '0 LID UD 915 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 IIEV —EDIDR WE I HEREB OF PYTHATT 15 PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT PREPARED BY ME OR UNNUER MY RECT SUPERVISION AND T4AT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER J R THEUMOFTHESTATEOFMINNESCITA. DESIG�D jj S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA SS318 DRAWN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.04 HORZ. SCALE VERT. FEET SCALE FEET Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: 'haska@bolton-menk.com & MENK AKM -ED FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI 91 B.Il.n & M-k, — 2017, All R,ghtS R.—Bd ..bolton-inenk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 H:\ORNO\CI3110828\�D\C3D\110828ALl.d.g 2/21/2017 1:30 PM UC. NO. —E NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY 4" THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR Lu 4114 -------- TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY > � 0 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. �4�p _15�1�05-002� BEGIN S, STA 10+00.00 LA DSCAPE THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF - - ----------- -------------- Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS -------- DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." i G --------------- - - -A ------- - -- ---------------- - - - - I"HI -PAP - - - - - - > �o Do ------- ...... ------ ------ - - - - - - REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO WLLIa-k&-FiD� -_ - 05 2'BEHIND THE CURB --------- 0 950 14" 12, u - - __ -------------- - - - -------- co 0 > 5- ------------- ------- Alp, 3, , " , 0 ------------------- 7-9+00 Q,�Is - - - ----- - ---- L ------------- 0, x 2 r�l D 4 2—Y.0 0 --- 1�7 dm� 91- D VO - -----------7 gp ---------- Gu� END CITY PROJECT 12 L - 64:60 STA 129+28.81 bRQN1 -10� CONSTRUCTION LEGEND LOT X�' �n BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT —CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -\,* ------L ------- ------------- -- --- 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY F7 ROAD CROSS SLOPE TOP OF FINISHED X GENERAL NOTES: ---------- -- GRADE ELEVATION 1. FIELD VERIFYAN—D IVATCH-ALL-EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. ------------- -- ------ AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 m_s;;z_ 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YEU_6w— (ff_P_0XY)_ONTHE-- CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 0 PROTECTTREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. (D INSTALL GUARDRAIL (D PROTECT LANDSCAPING ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. Q SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL 0 B612 CURB & GUTTER 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ------ — ---- --- ---- --- --- 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. (D INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (D B1012 CURB & GUTTER 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE G PROTECT MAILBOX 0 PROTECT POWER POLE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. (D RELOCATE MAILBOX RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) FOX STREET� (D PROTECT DRIVEWAY (D GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 960 PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL 960 VPI 1V+� 6.27 ELEV 947.8 7 CURVE LEN- 140.00', .. .. .. 955 E=1. .. ..... . ..... 1 11 106 M i 1 '�6 -T I I I I �:� 955 VPI 126+53 49 + > VPI 124+07 26 I ELEV 939.27 URVE LEN > > 950 ELEV 936.Z1 -105.001 ]:-n (;7' > 950 URvrTFN_=f M-16— 'ID N E=0.20' 945 u 945 c cM 06 4 PROPOSEC 1. 1 CENTERLINE PROFILE 1 1 11 1 1, , . ... ... .. . . . + > + w d .. . ... .... . .... 940 > L 940 > "l,—EXISTING 0.82% C 'dRLINE PROFILE 935 0- >1 935 930 .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . 930 925 925 n, 1p cq O� 'n . . . . : :� , Lq . . " Dq g_ ` cq oq 11 "IF! Lq �m Dq R �q 'M 1 IqR 920 On ,61� c UD '0 1 M 6 1 01 '61 r4�. M r:�� 1 M r -z W� M ��6 DO C` DO M On di 0 n C` C� on 11 1 mi, On M MR On DO M Oci Do M 06 DO M 66 M On 1 CO !�P au M 920 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 0 20 40 0 5 10 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 FEV ISSUED FOR DATE IHEREB CEPTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, NDER MYDIRECTSUPE VISION ANDTHAT I UNDER NUFFTHEUWWSOFTH STATEOFMINNUCTA. OR REPORT VVAS PREPARED AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIOVAL=EE1 S.A.P. DRAWN CITY OF 152-105-002 ORONO, MINNESOTA SHEET 5.05 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 0 AKM OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com & MENK FOX STREET CHEOED IMPROVEMENTS DAVID P. MARTINI 9) BItn & MRI In, 21\7� All R,ght, R --d —bolton—enk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 A 3D\110828ALl.d.g 2,21/2017 1:30 PM �ORNO\C.O EN�2 UC. NO. DATE BEGIN S.A.P. 152-105-002 STA 10+00.00 — --------------- Q (D 2od— - ------- T --- L -D 00 REMOVAL LIMITS EXTEND UP TO 0 P: w Ln - - - - - - - - - - - C5-------------- - - --------------------------- TBEHIND THE CURB i c) 06 C, In L11v, ':�A `1� + on, L -------- ------------- + 2 < w V 7 1p 0 Z ----------- + < w RI -ve L U) �?9 DO------- s c T O�-- ----- ---- --- ----- - -------- ---------- ---- __MATCH iSTING INb'US 73,0011 r ---------------- ------- ------------ ---- A p------------ CD 'p, 14+00 -- 0) �jEAD Sso. -uA STREET ------ STA 11 ____ 0 +68 -------- X �T - I,- L A 33.99' RT -J '7- -- u AVE ---- ----- Ou -- ------ '001) I a-- - - --- 777�, L -- ---- ---------- - ----------- -- --- OTJ ---- -- ---- WALL w OD WALL cps - WALL ___ < - -- -- --------------------------- Z_ 00 ------- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) ----------- --- + ------------ — e MATCH EX15TING BITUMINOUS < cp ----- ----- END CITY PROJECT STA 129+28.81 GENERAL NOTES: NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY 'p A THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. S9 TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY rn 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE ", -Z GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. In rn 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. < THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. -,\,,DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. FOX STREET�: 975 ........... 975 VPI:3+82.96 EUEV969.00 Do CURVE I EN=17C.Ci 01 CT! N. 970 E 2.87' > 1 Ln UE) Lol I . + c, . . 1. 1.. � I. .. . . VPI 15+8Z' 42::::�� 970 ELEV 960.22 'o r .. . .. . .. CURVE LEN::60.00! > E=0.2!;' 965 t 7 965 VPI 101+514.68, E LEV 949.8 5 > -440% ELEV 951 Oa CURVE LEN=80.6V CURVE LEN� 30,00' E=1.01' CONSTRUCTION LEGEND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 960 E=0.32 �jm ____ zw� 960 So lb . . ..... .. ]�: I DO - r, b, or, W ROAD CROSS SLOPE 9 5 5 16? 'R c ILI o�� + LID Ln + on 1, 00 'n - 0 U1 > . ... . . 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X TOP OF FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION 955 u O_ -EXISTING CENTERLINEP.. FIL u o_ AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 (D PROTECTTREE 950 2.20%_ L -ibw INSTALL GUARDRAIL 0 PROTECT LANDSCAPING 950 4ROPOSIED CENTIERUNE RROI`ILE SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL B612 CURB & GUTTER U, q, 6 ....... . INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (D B1012 CURB & GUTTER 945 on Ln 1 > 1 � � � � � : :1 .... ... (D PROTECT MAILBOX C) (D RELOCATE MAILBOX 0 PROTECT POWER POLE RELOCATE POWER POLE (B Y OTHERS) . . . . .. . . . 945 > PROTECT DRIVEWAY (D GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 940 PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL 940 ... ... ... cn� Do Do In .. 1� ... `� `� T U� 4 d., 0 UO J. r- cq 2 0� C'� 935 '0-60 C5, C, C5 '0 on CD M C51 CD M C5 M , M . , I :�� Ub 1 .1 6� 06 .1 Oi �, M M c, M N I Cn� I ji, 1 _�� * 'T J cn as 1 4 1 n �i I M M M -M -M 'T 935 I O�00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 IIEV I-EDI.A BATE I HERE ICERT-11ATT 15 PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT VVAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNNUERMY RECT UPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ER T111-01TI STATIROFMINNESCITA. DBIGNED S.A.P. 152-105-002 Aw SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 BOLTON CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.06 HORZ. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET S& MENK Phone: Email: Chaska@bolton-menk (952) 448-8838 com AK� FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHECKED OF DAVID P. MARTIN6'122 21\7 AIIR,ght,R ... -d —bolton-enk.com 2 02/21/2017 DISM FOX STREET P LAN & PROFILE 49 IH\B,JO;\&ME,,kiIn, A ORN C. 8\�2 3D\11O828AL1.d.g2 21 20171:30PM / 1 UC. NO -E Do q UCi Z z z 0 EE: u Z B- z I= z LD 0 CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA z ZIE �,� 0 < It= ------------ 0 W0008 0 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) 0 ------------------ Z ----------- + F ----------- ----------- C, DO z + F- + -cm, O� --01 + -------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- z u + I Do 1`1 1 (D F- 1z1- - - - — w , , Z,:�- ED 11 DO w LANDSCAPE ------ Z- �MI -------- -------------- - - - - ------------ - ------------------------------ 113 Cp .3 QUEST --------------------- ------ - - K- 0 - - -------- : --- ----------- ----------- E3 C OUEST EH LP C----- ---------------- --- ------ r) C C'u CE7N u D �'ENTI R-- DINI OL OB -8 F X S REET 19+00 20+00 21+00 ---a 22 00 -- ----- -- - 7-4 00 ICEL- ,, �111 CD 0 XCEL 6" WOOD POSTS -6" W , , 11 1 19 —zlib�k E -------- --- --- — -------- --- -- ---- T7 --------- —'1'7M,7-7, A VE- 7t- -�777 — — — — — — — — — — — — A -7-7 ---- -------- - ----- LATCAPE - - - - - - --------------------- -------------- 0) L - - ------------------- -- ------------- 0 K ------- ----- -6D ----------- --- , -<�, CAPE NRO K) of ------- ------- --- D, Q -- ---- ---- OU --- --- ------------- ----- -- 1� ----------- L CK) Z, - - ----- -- -------------- + 0 - nt C,— G, ---------- -- -------- --- - Do — -- — -- --- --- ----------- -- --- - - - - - - - - ----------------- ------------- - - - - - - - - - ------ z BRICK SIGN COLUMN cw, SPLIT RAIL FENCE BRICK SIGN COLUMN SPLIT R IL FENCE 3RIlCK SIGN COLUMN F BRI K SON COLUMN PROTECT SANITARY MATCH�EXISTING B TUMINOUS GENERAL NOTES: FLUSHING VAVLE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND B- 1. FIELD VERIFYAND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAYWIDTHS. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED By < BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ww 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY Lu 0 -1 ROAD CROSS SLOPE CIO 0!� U-1 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 6Sl-454-0002. TOP OF FINISHED U'I ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. Lu 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X GRADE ELEVATION 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. 5. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS S 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND 0 PROTECTTREE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." INSTALL GUARDRAIL 0 PROTECT LANDSCAPING (D SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL 0 B612 CURB & GUTTER FOXSiTkttT INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (D B1012 CURB & GUTTER 980 PROTECT MAILBOX PROTECT POWER POLE VI -I 22+81.26 980 (D RELOCATE MAILBOX (9 RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTHERS) r -1966-81 -777— CU R� E LEI (D PROTECT DRIVEWAY 0 GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER E=2.69' .. . .. . .. . .. Q PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL 975 975 I E I I —4,�4 EV 960.22 T 20+06.81 CURNE LEN=60.00 VPI 18419.58 ELEV 965 ' 44 E=0.25' I I ELEV 9 ;7 ' 6Z I . . . CUR�ELEN=120.00'.. r� U6 970 I I CURVE. LEI� r -n �150.001 ig, E-0. . ss-� 1 1 + + I + 970 u Do '00 Ci -t, wo > > 't O� 0 1 1 1 ILL O;E 0% 965 n Do g '06 ui o6 + Do DO > 965 B- > /-EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE + 4 > + > . ... . .... --- I LU --4 .. . .... 960 960 -rKlJPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE . . ... . .... 9-55 955 950 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 950 945 945 CD Do ... ED -i 1. O� . r- ... ... ... DO 0) M 11 Iq 1. M 1 UD I` -1 L� cn ch� 0) ol S� �0 0 0 q p 0 940 - U1 o) 0 di 0110i I 0 M ED DO M DO oo M) 0 on � DO �� .6 DO I oo On ��J'. cn M i 0 0 6 UO on 10 6 10 UD � 10 D M 10 On M M UO M ui M 10 10 On LM �� Ln U6 to UO on tE UO UD w w On wD W On L� D On 940 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21-00 22+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 REY — WE IHEREB CEPTIFYTHATT 15 —N, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAM THE STATE MINNESOTA. PREPARED BY PROFESSIONAL =EE DEIIS�D jj S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 OF OF CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.07 HORZ. SCALE FEET VERT. SCALE FEET & MENK Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com AK� FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OF DAVID P. MARTINI CHENED All R,I -V d 9)�Bo JtN n�CMmkiln, 21�7 B —bolton-enk.com 26122 02/21/2017 DPM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 I. R 0 3. RN�2 3D\11O828AL3-d.g2 21 20171:30PM UC. NO. WE t7l u CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) L rBLIND INT. AHEAD 4; -- ------- 124 -1 --------- - - - - - - - ------------ 6 6 12* 2" j,"2' ------ E3 CP M --- -------- 142� 1 -------------- ------ --- ---------- ---- - ----- - --- --------- -- ------ - ------- ----- T71 u. CH- �A -- - ---- 7�- - ----- - - -------- �;77� - - - m 23�4� 24+00 25+00 FOX STR E ET 28 00T:1 22100T - 4p, OB -10 qj i -- — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — --- — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- -- ------- ------ --------- ---------------- I ------------------ --------- ------- --------- - _;� - ----- ------ ----------- ------------ ------- ---- ------- ------ --- -- -- --- ----------- --- -- ------ ---- - - -------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - �z7 --- -------- -!n�__ ------- ---- --------- '�o -------- ------ - ---------- ------ ----------- ou ou o ou ou L ou ou— ------- 7- 'Qu 64 ou ou— w o 7 CLEAN DITCH IN THIS AREA GENERAL NOTES: 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY zi 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR u CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY t� 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. S. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF L-1 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND —11110. ROAD CROSS SLOPE RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY X TOP OF FINISHED F71 GRADE ELEVATION AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 PROTECTTREE FOX ST REET ELEV 966.31, CU FIVE UEN=2 95.00- INSTALL GUARDRAIL PROTECT LANDSCAPING 970 E=169' SALVAGE & REINSTALL RETAINING WALL 0 B612 CURB & GUTTER 970 (D INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN B1012 CURB & GUTTER (D PROTECT MAILBOX PROTECT POWER POLE 965 RELOCATE MAILBOX RELOCATE POWER POLE (BY OTH 965 UD DO PROTECT DRIVEWAY GUTTER OUT CURB & GUTTER 960 -�'T 1> PROTECT CULVERT END TREATMENT TANGENT TERMINAL 960 DO Un 955 --�_6.8r, 1 zd� > �PROPOSED CENTERLINE.PROFILE 955 VP1 26+3103 ELEV942 75 E LEN= 00.00' 950 E=1.63 950 945 EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE m Do q Ln m 945 . .. . .. . .. .... .. . .. . .. . .... . .. .. > 940 940 935 .. .... . .... .. .... .. .... I 935 DO DO. Lq . . . . . AD DO r-. . . . Dq . . . . cq . . Dq 2 q UD U, m L', AD I -q m U0 OP q L', `� . w Up .. ... . Do O� .... r-. 930 U1 U, 10 10 L' on 1. on ci mi di U` Do m ch on w -* m On I A m on On on o on on o On I On On On SO On 930 22,00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26-00 27+00 28+00 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 FEV —ED FDR IHEREB CERTIFYTHATT 15 PI -AN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT PREPARED BY UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DU LY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL =EE, UNDER THE THE STATE MINNBOTA. D111. jj�D S.A.P. 152-105-002 SHEET 0 20 40 0 5 10 BOLTON CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 -AVVS OF OF CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA 5.08 HORZ. VERT. SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Phone: (952) 448-8838 Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com & MENK AK� FOX STREET IMPROVEMENTS OHEC(ED OF DAVID P. MARTINI 21�7 AIIR,ght,R ... —d —bolton-enkxom 26122 02/21/2017 DISM FOX STREET PLAN & PROFILE 49 IH�B,Rt,n�C,Mmkiln, o 3. FN�2 3D\11O828AL1.d.g2 21 20171:30PM UC. NO. I -E z I -- u < z u + 0 G ou�-- u ------------------------------ -------- L ------------ clu —21 cE'NJURY INK -- ---- ----------------- G--- --- --- - ----- RPQINT t 31 28 00tx, 29'+Oa 30+00 FOX STREET GENERAL NOTES 1. FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS. 2. INSTALL A 4 -INCH SOLID DOUBLE YELLOW (EPDXY) ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD. 3. ROAD CROSS SLOPES ARE 2.0% UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT WARPING WILL BE REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS. 4. INSTALL CURB & GUTTER AS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER. S. CURB & GUTTER SHALL INCLUDE TAPERED ENDS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 1.11. z z 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSiBLE FOR COORDINATING THE z m z z RELOCATION OF POWER POLES. z m 2 + " + + m z < < in — t; z L9 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) — — — — — — — — - WffL'ANL: —WETLAND G WET�ND Ou MARKER 0 ON Ou- - — — — — — — — - - C TE JE - — — — — — — — - ------ -------- - — — — - — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — - - — -- -- -------------- ----------- --------- -T ---------- ,j IAUTIN C,� TION CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK 32+00 BENCHMARK DISK IN CONC-935.81/ 61 33+00 * 34+00 OB -12 im6k u z z z z z + + zz_— FD z (D co L L U:-! OU Du 0 ou :� 11MG AL -WALL ---- ----ANG- LEL --------------------- CONCRETE 32+00 BRIDGE DECK BENCHMARK FOX CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) - - - - - - - - - WETLAND —WELLAND — — -- — -- GAS MARKER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;-, - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- — -------- ---- ---------------- ---------- VILL. u "ll A ------------------------- — &33+00 t 7 1 4 4�0 , ��,0000 ul) M I= z 0 0`� NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY END S.A.P. 152-105-002 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. STA 34+53.78 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." cfl OB -12 DISK IN CONC=9,35.� � I/ I I tiCAITO — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 1AIT101 ------- -------------------- --- - ------------- - ------------- 25, -- -------- - CONCRETE -------- ST PA� ST GAS M MEII-81LD WELLAND ST 7-1� WING WALL - - - - - - - WETLAND mo- G— E- m + 0 2- wm— WETL4NS,,\ cr. m z z < MAT, EXISI m < ek MAT EXISTING BITUMINOUS 2 + OB -13 f AGENDAITEM Item No.: 19 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: City Council Committee Appointments Update Presenter: Doug Reeder Agenda Section: City Interim City Administrator Administrator's Report 1. Purpose. To amend Resolution 6716 to update City Council committee appointments due to the appointment of Wendy Dankey to the City Council 2. Background. Resolution 6716, A Resolution Designating Selected Appointments, was adopted by the City Council on January 9 before the appointment of Councilmember Dankey. This resolution will amend that resolution to allow the appointment of Councilmember Dankey to cornmittees. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution Amending Resolution 6716, A Resolution Designating Selected Appointments. Exhibits A. A Resolution Amending Resolution 6716, A Resolution Designating Selected Appointments Prepared By: DR Reviewed By: D5P, Approved By: D5R S H CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 6716 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments included in Resolution 6716 for the 2017 committees listed below are modified as shown and the appointments to the Big Island Committee are added. Development Process Review Committee (Code Review Committee) Dennis Walsh Wendy Dankey Jeremy Barnhart Ben Goodwin Will Haack Matt Johnson Peter Lanpher Andy Johnsrud Brad Maenner School District Committee Dennis Walsh Wendy Dankey Correy Farnick City Administrator Big Island Committee Dennis Walsh Victoria Seals Julie Ruegemer Jan Berg AGENDAITEM Item No.: 20 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: 2016 General Fund Budget Amendments Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda City Administrator's Finance Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2016 General Fund Budget Amendments as discussed at the February 27' council meeting. 2. Background. At the February 27h council meeting, staff presented the preliminary General Fund budget results. The comparison to budget was favorable with total expenditures coming in under budget and revenues exceeding budget. A copy of the staff memo from the meeting is included for your reference. The City's budgetary control is set at the department level. As a result, any department that is over budget for the year is required to have its budget adjusted. Five departments did exceed their budgets for the year and require budget amendments. The budget increases will be offset by a budget reduction in the Police Department. The overall General Fund expenditure budget is not being increased with expenditures at 96.43% of budget. 3. Budget Amendments. Department Adopted Budget Amendment Amended Budget Law & Legal Services $ 102,500 $ 10,420 $112,920 Central Services 244,470 18,330 262,800 Parks 108,120 1,720 109,840 Golf 152,640 17,710 170,350 Special Services 95,750 27,270 123,020 Police 4,076,850 (75,450) 4,001,400 Total General Fund $7,708,570 0.00 $7,708,570 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion amending the 2016 General Fund Budget as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the 2016 General Fund Budget Amendments as presented. Exhibits Budget Memo — 2/27/17 Council Meeting Prepared By: .*YV Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R, MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council From: Ron Olson, Finance Director Subject: Budget Update Date: February 27, 2017 Attachments: 1) Revenue Summary 2) Expenditure Summary 3) Revenue Detail 4) Expenditure D �5 enrt Listing e t Li� s The 4th quarter General Fund summaries are included with this memo. The summaries represent revenues and expenditures incurred through December 3 I't. Because we are still receiving and processing some transactions from 2016, the amounts should be considered preliminary. It is not anticipated that the amounts included in this report will change significantly prior to the closing of the year. Current projections have revenues 104.62% of budget and expenditures at 96.43% of budget. In net dollars, revenues are projected to exceed expenditures by $630,980. General Fund Revenues Attached with this memo are both the General fund revenue summary by category, and the revenue line item detail. Property taxes represent 52.1% of the total revenues and are the single most important revenue source. Current year property tax collection were 99.4% of budget. Delinquent taxes and interest that was collected during the year brings this revenue category to 100.8% of budget. Licenses and Permits finished the year at 103.2% of budget. While the Building Permit line item came in slightly under budget, this was more than offset by the Mechanical and Plumbing permit lines. Other Governmental Revenues finished the year at 116.8% of budget; a major portion of the overage is the result higher than anticipated Police State Aid. Charges for Service were at 105.6%. The primary reason for this are the construction related revenue lines (including pass thru charges) which were all over 100% of budget. These four revenue categories represent 96. 1 % of the revenue budget. Other minor categories that were over 100% of budget are other Miscellaneous (13 6.0%) and Other Sources (167.2%). The only revenue category that did not exceed budget was Fine Revenue. This category only reached 90.7% of budget. The Fine Revenue category represents 1.2% of the total revenue budget. Investment interest will be at budget for the year. In real dollars, the City's investments earned a total of $187,515.10 in 2016. This compares to an amount of $173,123.41 in 2015. Interest earnings are allocated to each fund based on monthly fund balances. The amount allocated will be adjusted to reflect the market value of investments on 12/31/2016. A listing of investments at year end is included for your review. Expenditures The overall General Fund expenditure amounts are currently at 96.4% of budget. This figure is based on actual expenditures to date, with an estimated amount added for expenditures that have not yet been processed. Five departments are over their expenditure budgets and will require budget adjustments. At 128.48% of budget, the Special services department was significantly (27,268) over budget. However, this department is used to account for expenditures that are largely passed through to the parties that received the service. The offsetting revenue lines for Police Special Services and Engineering & Legal fees offset the expenditure overages. The Golf Course is over budget by $17,706 (111.6%); this overage is offset by higher than budgeted golf revenues for the year. Central Services exceed budget by $18,324 (107.5%). This is due to two main reasons. One is the Software Licensing line which was a new line item in the 2015 budget. It was created to account for changes in the way software companies license their products. These costs have increased dramatically over the last few years. The other line item is LOGIS Applications. In 2016 the City moved to a cloud based backup solution, which was not budgeted for in 2016. Law and Legal Services was over budget by $10,418 (110.2%). This is the result of higher than budgeted jail charges from Hennepin County and the need to use a conflict attorney to prosecute a couple of cases in 2016. The Park budget was $1,720 (101.59%) over budget for the year. This overage is in the maintenance area and is the result of the Council increased focus on parks over the past few years. All other departments were either at or below budgeted amounts. Budget adjustments for the departments that are over budget will be prepared for the Council's approval at the March 13 1h meeting. The overall expenditure budget will not be increased; the increases to the individual department budgets will be offset by budget reductions to other departmental budgets. AGENDAITEM Item No.: 21 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description : Agreement for Legal Services- Prosecution Presenter: Doug Reeder Agenda City Administrator's Interim City Administrator Section: Report 1. Purpose. To approve a five year contract for criminal prosecution legal services. 2. Background. At the City Council Meeting of January 23, 2017 the City Council appointed the firm of Tallen & Baertschi to be the City Attorney for criminal prosecution services for the City of Orono. This five year agreement was approved by the City Attorney to set forth the agreement on services to be provided. 3. Cost. This agreement sets forth a monthly cost of $2650.00 per month for 2017 and 2018 with cost of living adjustments for years 2019, 2020, and 2021. 4. Funding. Criminal prosecution costs are budgeted in the 2017 General Fund Budget. 5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that this agreement be approved by the City Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the Mayor and Interim City Administrator to execute a five year agreement with Tallen & Baertschi for criminal prosecution. Exhibits A. Agreement for Legal Services Prepared By: DR Reviewed By: D5R Approved By: D5R AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Tallen & Baertschi ("The Attorney"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES AND RELATIONSHIP. A. The Attorney shall furnish and perform criminal prosecution and related legal services for the City. B. The Attorney will attend a City Council meeting annually to present a report of prosecution activity. C. 'fhe Attorney shall be engaged as an independent contractor and not as a City employee. The Attorney is free to contract with other entities. D. Neither the City Council nor any of its members shall dictate or influence the disposition of cases. The Attorney shall have sole decision making authority over whether to charge, pursue, or dismiss a case. All correspondence between the City Council and Prosecutor shall be directed through the City Administrator. 2. TERM. A. The Attorney shall serve a term beginning April 1, 2017, and continuing for a period of five (5) years. B. This Agreement may be terminated at any time without cause by resolution of the City Council, provided that the City shall give the Attorney thirty (30) days written notice before the termination becomes effective. 3. PAYMENT. A. Criminal Prosecution: The City shall pay Attorney a flat fee for all criminal prosecution fees, in the amount of $2650.00 per month for calendar years 2017 and 2018. It is anticipated that there will be a cost of living adjustment for years 2019, 2020 and 2021. The costof living adjustment, to the extent the Cily gpproves an adjustment, shall not exceed the cost of living,- adjustment provided to all non-union employees for the respectiy� �ear. Actual expenses for items such as subpoena delivery fees, transcripts, photo copy charges (S .20/page) will be billed in addition to the fee for attorney services. This does not cover any fees for appeals or forfeitures as specified in Paragraphs C and D below. B. When the Attorney determines that there is a conflict of interest in prosecuting a case, the Attorney shall arrange for a qualified conflict prosecutor to assume prosecution responsibility. The City agrees to compensate the conflict prosecutor at the same rate the Attorney charges for hourly work as specified in Paragraph C below. C. Appeals of any pretrial orders, if any, shall only be initiated by the Attorney after a discussion with and approval by the Chief of Police, or their designee. Any such appeals will be compensated at the rate of $135 per hour of attorney time plus any necessary expenses. Appeals of convictions initiated by defendants shall be compensated at the same rate as specified above. The Attorney shall notify the Chief of Police within five days of receiving a Notice of Appeal. D. On vehicle forfeitures, the Attorney shall receive 30% of the proceeds from the sale of the forfeited vehicle, after payment of seizure, towing, storage, forfeiture and sale expenses, and satisfaction of valid liens against the vehicle, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 169A. 63 subd. 10. In no case will the City be responsible for any attorney's fees over and above 30% of the proceeds of the vehicle that is forfeited. E. Payments for legal services provided to the City shall be made in the manner provided by law. The City will normally pay for services within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services rendered. 4. MISURANCE. The Attorney will purchase and maintain sufficient insurance to protect Attorney against claims for legal malpractice. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. Minnesota. A. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of B. Assignment. The Attorney may not assign or refer any of the legal services to be performed hereunder without the written consent of the Orono City Council. C. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by the City and the Attorney. Work wider the contract shall not commence under the contract until April 1, 2017. D. Changes. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the approval in writing of the Orono City Council. E. Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Attorney must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Attorney pursuant to this Agreement. Attorney is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Attorney receives a request to release data, Attorney must immediately notify the City. The City will give Attorney instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Attorney agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Attorney's officers', agents', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. Dated: � 2017- CITY OF ORONO M AND Dennis Walsh, Mayor Poug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Dated: � 2017. ATTORNEY IM Steven M. Tallen Tallen & Baertschi AGENDAITEM Item No.: 22 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Website Designer Proposals Presenter: Doug Reeder Agenda City Administrator's Interim City Administrator Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to select a website designer to redesign the City of Orono's website. 2. Background. 3. ProjectScope. Redesign of the City Website. 4. Cost. The City received 3 proposals. Listed below. Contractor Total Quote Linnihan Foy Advertising $96,300 Eleven $26,875 to $41,125 -West Lake Web Works $14,364 5. Funding. Funds are available in the General Fund Budget. 6. Staff Recommendation. Discuss the quotes and select a vendor to work out a detailed agreement with. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to direct staff and Communications Committee to prepare an agreement with one of the vendors for City council approval. Exhibits A. Westlake Web Works Proposal B. Linnihan Foy Advertising Proposal C. Eleven Proposal Prepared By: DR Reviewed By: D5R Approved By: D5R Westlake Web Works Proposal Option A: This will consist of a flat fee for the whole site with us just building the site and turning it back over to you to find a host and someone to maintain the site on a regular basis for you. What you will get with option A is: - Custom Website - Keywords - Google Places - Mobile Website Total price $14,364.00 Option B: This option consists of a upfront fee for the entire website, hosting fee and Domain transfer fee where you get a 10% discount for paying for the whole site in advance for a 3 year term. What you get with option B is: - Custom Website - Monthly Hosting - Unlimited Updates - Unlimited Pages - Email Hosting - I OOGB of Email Storage - Keywords - On -Site SEO - Google Places - Ongoing Support - Features - Custom Website - Analitica and Reporting - Mobile Website - Domain transfer fee $150.00 Total Price $13,077-60 Option C: This option You will receive everything you are getting in option B except final cost as this is broken down to monthly payments for 36 months at $399.00 per month. I would also need a deposit for this option and a Domain transfer fee. $399.00 per month @ 36 months $14,364.00 Deposit $1,197.00 Domain transfer fee $150.00 Total Price $15,711.00 QTATEIVIENT OF WORK AW City of Orono L! C1 ruy Website Redesign, Newsletters and Social Media Advertising February 27, 2017 16174 4 AVA 11 The City of Orono is looking to have their website redesigned with Linnihan Foy Advertising (LFA). LFA will also help the City of Orono with print newsletters, e -newsletters and social media account setup and management. PROJECT DETAILS Digital Strategy Develop website site map $24,300.00 1 $24,300.00 Develop website wireframes Organize existing copy to fit new site organization Organize website links to fit new site organization Design LFA will: $30,000.00 1 $30,000.00 Create designs for 7 page templates Image resizing for up to 100 pages Organize photo database Assign photos from database to new website pages Programming LFA will: $30,000.00 1 $30,000.00 • Develop the website within the WordPress platform • Develop up to 173 pages that fall within 7 templates • Include the following components: * 1 contact form * Homepage carousel with up to 4 banners • Use existing content for website assets and copy Make website responsive Conduct cross -browser testing Insert content for up to 173 pages Develop page titles and meta tags 0 Create/update website's Google Analytics Project Management 0 Includes internal project management and meeting time $12,000.00 1 $12,000.00 Total $96,300.001 STATF"FNIT OF �-AIORK & City of Orono 01IF Linn ihan Foy Website Redesign, Newsletters and Social Media Advertising February 27, 2017 ASSLJIVIPT�ONS & DEPENDENCIES This statement of work assumes: • After the statement of work is signed, changes are not to be made to the project scope, including, but not limited to, website functionality, components and size. Requests made outside of the signed scope may result in a change order to account for additional time and fees. • Client has up to two (2) rounds of revisions for website copy and up to two (2) rounds of revisions for website design. Additional revisions may result in additional time and fees. • Once the website goes into development, any changes made to the website design will be out of scope and will result in additional time and fees. • Client to provide feedback on all deliverables within agreed upon timeframe. Additional time may result in a revaluation of timeframe. X'WiTHAZI1111 LFA will send client a net 30 invoice upon commencement of the project. Projects lasting longer than 30 days will be billed progressively based on the project timeline. AGREEIVIENT By signing below, you are accepting the terms listed in this statement of work. Once LFA receives a signed copy of this agreement, a countersigned copy will be returned to you. City of Orono Print Newsletter LFA will: $4,000.00 1 I $4,000.00 Design a template for print newsletters Email Newsletter LFA will: $4,000.00 1 $4,000.00 Design a template for email newsletters Social Media LFA will: $4,000.00 1 $4,000.00 Branding Update Update the branding (colors, photos, copy.) for the following social media platforms: • Flickr • Twitter o Facebook Total $12,000.00 ASSLJIVIPT�ONS & DEPENDENCIES This statement of work assumes: • After the statement of work is signed, changes are not to be made to the project scope, including, but not limited to, website functionality, components and size. Requests made outside of the signed scope may result in a change order to account for additional time and fees. • Client has up to two (2) rounds of revisions for website copy and up to two (2) rounds of revisions for website design. Additional revisions may result in additional time and fees. • Once the website goes into development, any changes made to the website design will be out of scope and will result in additional time and fees. • Client to provide feedback on all deliverables within agreed upon timeframe. Additional time may result in a revaluation of timeframe. X'WiTHAZI1111 LFA will send client a net 30 invoice upon commencement of the project. Projects lasting longer than 30 days will be billed progressively based on the project timeline. AGREEIVIENT By signing below, you are accepting the terms listed in this statement of work. Once LFA receives a signed copy of this agreement, a countersigned copy will be returned to you. City of Orono STATF"FNIT OF �.AIORK & City of Orono IIIF Linn ihan Foy Website Redesign, Newsletters and Social Media Ad VeTOS i ng February 27, 2017 Signature Date Linnihan Foy Advertising Signature Date PROPOSAL CITY OF ORONO SITE REDESIGN http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/ Submitted on February 20th,2017 0 ELEVEN February 2011, 2017 Hello Denny and Vicki, I appreciate you considering ELEVEN for the City of Orono website. I feel we are uniquely qualified with our user experience and web design knowledge combined with more than 13 years of robust software experience. Our team is excited at the opportunity to work with you on creating a website that will effectively communicate and promote positive on -brand messaging while being easy for Orono to manage and maintain. Please call or email me if you have any questions while reviewing this proposal. Thank you in advance for your time reviewing, and for your consideration, Tony Hessburg, President of ELEVEN tony.hessburg@thinkELEVEN.com 612.229.7738 I � I 3k!A I Z Why ELEVEN We provide experienced people. Far beyond delivering brilliant creative, our team is highly experienced in web design and technology implementation. We are technology agnostic. We do not persuade you to use a software we prefer to use. Instead we keep current on technologies and impartially assess to determine the solution that will best suit your needs. This often results in cost efficiencies. We offer rapid time -to -value. Our approach is to assign a highly qualified team to quickly gain a critical understanding of your business and objectives to facilitate efficient development of creative and interactive solutions. We provide a no -ego, collaborative, hit -the -ground -running, attitude. We are eager to work hands- on with you to design a solution that is tailored to optimize your objectives and brand experience. We balance creative with technology and brand performance. Our knowledge of creating positive brand awareness combined with web design and development allows us to identifying opportunities that will improve the awareness and impression of the Orono brand. YourTeam Landon Hall With over 13 years of industry experience, Landon's eye for smart and purposeful l 40-W design has helped guide brands such as Bass Pro Shops, 3M Nexcare, Eyemart Express, Geneticure and Memphis Grills. He is a Senior Designer and Art Director at ELEVEN. When he is not designing websites or creating brand identities, you'll find him riding his bike, paddling in the wilderness, or trying out a new craft beer. And most likely, his cattle dog, Ryder, is by his side. Tony Hessburg Tony is a business -focused, strategy -minded marketing executive with 20 years of experience providing forward -thinking marketing, branding, retail channel management and interactive services for global brands. He has the unique experience of spending half his career with manufacturers, and half with a marketing and interactive agency. Tony's knowledge spans retail channel management to ecommerce. Tony has administered UX/U1 for interactive and ecommerce initiatives for several global brands including Aveda, Clarins, Eyernart Express, Geneticure, HOYA, Laura Mercier, Nyakio, Polaris, Power Plate, and UNICEF US Fund. Outside MUM' of work he spends his time with his 2 boys or riding some form of a board on snow, water or pavement. Brendan Loughrey =Brendan is an internationally -awarded creative director, copywriter and conceptual marketing consultant. Over the past 18 years, he has worked on both the agency and client -sides of the advertising and marketing world. He excels in leading creative teams in branding, interactive, broadcast and print campaigns. His work in event marketing won a coveted Platinum Graphics award, one of just seven presented globally. He has produced websites, mobile apps, direct mail, press kits, incentive programs, product naming and promotional campaigns. Past clients include Life Time Fitness, Johnson & Johnson, Toyota, St. Jude Medical, Syngenta, Bank of America, 3M, Cargill, NestI6, Hyundai, Polaris, Victory Motorcycles, Hormel, Boys Scouts of America and Medtronic. Outside of work, Brendan and his family have competed in dozens of athletic events across the country, including seven triathlons and a 100 -mile mountain bike race. Jeremy Wolfe Jeremy comes with 6 years development, UX and IT experience. Jeremy is ELEVEN's technical supervisor and lead developer of interactive and ecommerce. Clients include Aveda, Clarins, Deluxe Corp., Eyemart Express, Finish Line, HOYA, JBL, Kohler, Laura Mercier, Lumens, Nyakio, Ranger Boats, R6Vive and UNICEF. In addition to coding, his passions include photography and restoring classic cars. Our Approach Landon, Tony and Jeremy will make up your UX team. We bring a team approach using brainstorm sessions to UX to incorporate different viewpoints of user experience, usage trends, design, and technology innovations. Landon will be your assigned designer and Brendan will be available for brand positioning and copywriting needs. Our approach is to work together in a collaborative method to define website objectives, platform requirements and to bring forward the strongest brand positioning. We ask the City of Orono to assemble a group made up of leadership and key influencers to participate in a few meetings with us. Phase 1 We meet to wireframe the site and establish the content and functionality for each page template. During this session we discuss the hierarchy of messaging to the site visitor. MUM ' 3 From that meeting, we create a visual wireframe for key pages. This is not a completed design, rather a visual talking point to represent messaging hierarchy, content organization and style direction. Next we assess technologies and propose software, maintenance and hosting solutions. At the end of Phase 1 we will have design direction set and a technologies recommendation. Phase 1 Estimate = 40 hours at $150/hour = $6,000 Phase 2 (Optional) — Brand Positioning, Messaging and Copywriting Services In addition to photography and design, copywriting and messaging are essential to providing a positive brand experience. Therefore I recommend leveraging professional copywriting services and meeting for 2 to 4 hours with Brendan and myself to go through a branding and messaging exercise. $2,250 for meeting and developing headings and call outs for up to 4 pages with up to one round of revisions. Additional copywriting for the body of the website to be done on a time basis. Brendan's rate is $125/hour. Phase 3 — Design & Develop Once we agree on the technology solution, we establish the design and development budget. Below is a preliminary range for 2 possible technology platforms. This is a best guess with a large range as we have not yet established the number of page templates or functionality for the website. Regarding design, we begin with creating 3 key pages in both desktop and mobile layout. Once we have design approval for these pages we will establish creative guidelines and direction for photo and possible video components. Then we will design the remainder of the website pages. Wordpress could be in this range of: 54 to 70 design hours at $125/hour = $6,750 to $8,750 60 to 120 development hours at $125/hour $7,500 to $15,000 20 project management hours at $125/hour $2,500 4 hours at $125/hour to set up hosting and social media on site = $500 $17,250 to $26,750 ELEVEN" ' Wix could be the range of: 72 to 120 design/development (occur simultaneously) hours at $125/hour = $9,000 to $15,000 20 project management hours at $125/hour = $2,500 3 hours at $125/hour to set up hosting and social media on site = $375 $11,875 to $17,875 Phase 3 - Ongoing Social Media Management and Maintenance Social Media writing and posting services can be provided at $60/hour. Clients often use 2.5 to 4 hours of Social Medial services a week. Wordpress Wordpress is a more complex Content Management System (CMS) that may require training for a staff member to manage website content. Wordpress will require hosting services set up and ongoing software update implementations. Clients often plan 10 to 30 hours a quarter depending on the complexity of the website and the plugin software used to build the site. Wordpress services can be provided at $125/hour. Wix Wix has a very simple to use Content Management System and most clients self -manage. Also, you will not require any ongoing software maintenance as Wix hosts the website and manages security updates and backend maintenance. Desired website design modifications can be provided for $125/hour. Summary We employ a dedicated, experienced staff offering UX perspectives from different disciplines to collaborate on how to create the best user experience, and accomplish your online objectives. Please feel free to email or call me at 612-229-7738 if you would like to discuss this proposal. We are looking forward to working with you on this project. ELVEN" ' + j Thank you for your consideration! ELEVEN AGENDAITEM Item No.: 23 Date: March 13, 2017 Item Description: Claims/Bills Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda City Administrator's Finance Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 107048 to 107111, totaling $437,002.37. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment 107070 Insituform 171,808.74 Payment for the 2016 sewer lining projects that were approved by the Council last year. #107077 LMCIT $ 141,747.00 Payment for Workers' Compensation Insurance for the 2017 Calendar year. #107096 Online Services $14,370.00 Payment for the online permitting software that the City Council approved earlier this year. # 107110 Waste Management $8,257.12 Payment for Curbside Recycling for the month of March 2017. For the past 4 months we have been receiving a Recycled Materials Offset (RMO) which has reduces our costs. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits Check Register Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By: D5R NX City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Invoice GIL Account Number 101-41900-352 BUDGET PRINTING 03/13/2017 107051 AWWA 03/13/2017 107048 7001325743 601-49400-433 Total 107048: BEN & JOHN KIEFFER 03/13/2017 107049 2016-00513 101-22205 Total 107049: Ben & Kelly Olsen 03/13/2017 107050 2016-00809 101-22205 Total 107050: BUDGET PRINTING 03/13/2017 107051 3540 101-41900-352 BUDGET PRINTING 03/13/2017 107051 3910 101-41900-352 BUDGET PRINTING 03/13/2017 107051 3963 101-42110-352 BUDGET PRINTING 03/13/2017 107051 4031 101-41110-489 Total 107051 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 0311312017 107052 CF021817 101-42110-402 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 CF022317 101-42110-439 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 CF022417 101-42110-437 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 CF022717 101-42110-437 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 R0022217 101-41300-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 R0030117 101-41500-433 CARDMEMBEIR SERVICE 03/13/2017 107052 S0022717 101-43000-402 Total 107052 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/13/2017 107053 5865-1/FEB. 601-49400-381 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/13/2017 107053 5865-1/FEB. 602-49450-381 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/13/2017 107053 5865-1/FEB. 101-41900-381 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03113/2017 107053 5865-1/FEB. 101-42110-381 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 03/13/2017 107053 5865-1/FEB. 101-45210-381 Total 107053: CENTURY LINK 03/13/2017 107054 447/JAN/17 101-45210-321 Description Department Invoice Amount 05/01/17-04/30/18- membership S. Oberaigner Water 196.00 196.00 Escrow Refund -#2016-00513-2024 Shadywood Rd 2,500.00 2,500.00 Escrow Refund #2016-00809-3470 North Shore Dr 2.500.00 2,500.00 Name Tag -Mayor Walsh Central Services 6.95 Nameplates -Council Mbmr & Interim City Admin Central Services 21.88 Receipt Books Police Department 193.17 Mayor Plaque -Recognition Mayor & Council 16.20 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02/20/17 Golf Course 238.20 Car wash #235 Police Department 10.00 Lake Area Emergency Mgmt Meeting Lunch Police Department 18.90 Award Certs & Certs Holders for Banquet Police Department 51.45 Frames for Award Certs for Banquet Police Department 24.66 Food -Welcome for Doug Reeder Administration 30.02 MNGFOA 17- Membership Renewal -R. Olson Finance Department 60.00 Front End Alignment Unit#431 Public Works Department 75.00 270.03 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02/20/17 Water 798.25 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02/20/17 Sewer 605.13 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02/20/17 Central Services 1,234.87 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02120/17 Police Department 321.99 FEB/17-Gas-01/21/17-02/20/17 Golf Course 193.27 Jan/1 7 & Feb/1 7 -GC Phone/DSC Golf Course 403.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 107054: CHOO CHOO RESTAURANT & B 03113/2017 107055 CHECK39 101-42110-439 2017 -PD awards banquet Total 107055: CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 03/13/2017 107056 0014571 101-42110-402 #233 -Oil, Filter, service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 03/13/2017 107056 0014573 101-42110-402 Battery Replacement -#242 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 03/13/2017 107056 0014574 101-42110-402 #237 test coolant leak, over heating CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 03/13/2017 107056 0014579 101-42110-402 #245 oil, filter, service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 03113/2017 107056 0014587 101-42110-402 #243 oil filter and service Total 107056: CULLIGAN 03/13/2017 107057 02&03/17101 101-45210-403 softener rental Total 107057: CULLIGAN 03/13/2017 107058 2017-00154 101-32590 Refund- Permit#2017-00154 2010 Shoreline Dr Total 107058: DANIELLE AMIRA 03113/2017 107059 FEB/2017 101-41500-331 Mileage -Bridgewater Bank Deposit Total 107059: DPC INDUSTRIES 03/13/2017 107060 827000160-1 601-49400-216 chemicals Total 107060: EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC 03/1312017 107061 00113602 -IN 101-43000-224 Spates Ave Fire Lane Access Total 107061: ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/13/2017 107062 462306 101-41900-352 Wellhead Ordinance 186 ECIVI PUBLISHERS INC 03/13/2017 107062 465633 101-41900-352 AD -Open City Council Seat 2017 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/13/2017 107062 465635 101-41900-352 AD -Open City Council Seat 2017 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/13/2017 107062 465637 101-45210-352 AD -GC Clubhouse Attendant ECM PUBLISHERS INC 03/13/2017 107062 465638 101-45210-352 AD -Seasonal Parks & GC Maint Job Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Golf Course Finance Department Water Public Works Department Central Services Central Services Central Services Golf Course Golf Course Page: 2 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Invoice A-- 403.50 659.91 659.91 205.35 205.21 45.79 114.83 613.92 20.60 20.60 50.00 50.00 23.54 23.54 241.47 241.47 62.50 92.50 92.50 55.50 55.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Department Invoice Amount 343.68 Central Services 250.00 250.00 Central Services 4,000.00 4,000.00 Public Works Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Public Works Department 2.63 Public Works Department 64.99 Public Works Department 3.50 Central Services 14.40 Total 107062: FIRST LAB 03/13/2017 107063 FLOO167721 101-41900-489 2017 -annual subscription fee Total 107063: FOAM IT SPRAY FOAM INSULAT 03/13/2017 107064 0308170RO 101-41900-404 Insulation in Public Works Bd1g Total 107064: G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006347457 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006347457 101-43000-221 towels G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006349833 101-41900-404 mat G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006349834 101-41900-404 mat G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006358758 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006358758 101-43000-221 towels G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006370059 101-43000-226 uniforms G & K SERVICES 03/1312017 107065 1006370059 101-43000-221 towels G & K SERVICES 03/13/2017 107065 1006370059 101-41900-404 mats Total 107065: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/13/2017 107066 351845 601-49400-403 Exhaust Pipe, Muffler, Ubolts #711 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/13/2017 107066 351951 602-49450-403 Supplies for Unit 711 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/13/2017 107066 352976 101-41900-223 Floor Dry GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/13/2017 107066 353173 101-45210-403 Airl'ilter, cleaner Toro Blower GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03113/2017 107066 353492 101-45210-403 Filter GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 03/13/2017 107066 353935 101-43000-402 Flasher Unit 427 Total 107066: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 03113/2017 107067 7020625 601-49400-489 locates GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 03/13/2017 107067 7020625 602-49450-489 locates Total 107067: HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 02/28/2017 106998 1000653689 101-43000-226 safety glasses HID SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 02/28/2017 106998 23437303 101-43000-226 safety glasses Department Invoice Amount 343.68 Central Services 250.00 250.00 Central Services 4,000.00 4,000.00 Public Works Department 64.99 Public Works Department 2.63 Central Services 10.80 Central Services 21.92 Public Works Department 64.99 Public Works Department 2.63 Public Works Department 64.99 Public Works Department 3.50 Central Services 14.40 Water 52.33 Sewer 8.24 Central Services 43.45 Golf Course 32.36 Golf Course 49.83 Public Works Department 13.87 200.08 Water 74.93 Sewer 74.92 149.85 Public Works Department 88.56 - Public Works Department 88.56- City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Page: 4 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 106998: 177.12 - HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 02/28/2017 107046 1000653689 101-43000-226 safety glasses Public Works Department 88.56 Total 107046: 88.56 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 03/13/2017 107068 G808837 601-49400-227 Soft Copper Tubing Water 285.00 Total 107068: 285.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 03/13/2017 107069 1000087303 101-41600-309 jail charges Law/Legal Services 314.12 Total 107069: 314.12 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES 03/13/2017 107070 C13.111229 602-16500 2016 Sewer Projects 180,851.30 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES 03/13/2017 107070 C13.111229 602-20600 2016 Sewer Projects 9,042.56 - Total 107070: 171,808.74 INTEGRATELECOM 03/13/2017 107071 14484244 101-42110-321 Phone service Police Department 295.99 INTEGRATELECOM 03/13/2017 107071 14484244 101-41900-321 Phone Service Central Services 414.38 INTEGRATELECOM 03/13/2017 107071 14484244 601-49400-321 Phone Service Water 69.06 INTEGRATELECOM 03/1312017 107071 14484244 602-49450-321 Phone Service Sewer 207.19 Total 107071: 986.62 INTOXIMETERS 03/13/2017 107072 557139 101-42110-240 mouthpieces Police Department 57.00 Total 107072: 57.00 J H LARSON COMPANY 02/28/2017 107002 S101413318. 101-43000-403 Electric Plug For Patch Truck Heater Cord Public Works Department 62.23 - Total 107002: 62.23- JACKIE YOUNG 03/13/2017 107073 FEB/2017 101-41300-319 CC meetings, 2/13 & 2/27 Administration 450.00 JACKIE YOUNG 03/13/2017 107073 FEB/2017 101-42400-319 PC meeting -02/21/17 Building & Zoning 300.00 Total 107073: 750.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 5 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number JAMES KREY 03/13/2017 107074 2016-01313 101-22205 Escrow Refund -#2016-01313-2560 Old Beach Rd Total 107074: I -- 6,499.00 Police Department 198.00 Central Services 198.00 KELLY HERZOG 03/13/2017 107075 KH030217 101-42110-437 mileage reimb training -MN Gun Laws KELLY HERZOG 03/13/2017 107075 KH030217 101-42110-437 meal reimb training -MN Gun Laws Total 107075: LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DI 03/13/2017 107076 2017-ORON 101-41110-433 list Qtr Levy 2017 Total 107076: LEAGUE OF MIN CITIES INS TR 03/13/2017 107077 ORON01000 703-49960-151 WC Insurance -01/01/17-12/31/18 Total 107077: LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 03/13/2017 107078 1297291-201 101-42110-311 March/1 7- contract fee Total 107078: LOGIS 03/13/2017 107079 42990 101-42110-310 Police Records 1/2017 LOGIS 03/13/2017 107079 42990 101-42110-329 Internet 1/2017 LOGIS 03/13/2017 107079 42990 101-41900-329 Internet 1/2017 LOGIS 03/13/2017 107079 42990 101-41900-319 Backups -01/2017 Total 107079: LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 03/13/2017 107080 B381789 101-43000-240 Adaptor LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 03/13/2017 107080 B382409 101-41900-404 Sealant -City Hall LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 03/13/2017 107080 B382840 101-43000-221 Degreaser Sprayer LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 03/13/2017 107080 B383585 101-43000-402 Eye Bolt for Trailer Brake Hook-up Total 107080: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 03/13/2017 107081 20206902 101-43000-212 Unleaded Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 03/13/2017 107081 20206903 101-43000-212 Diesel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 03/13/2017 107081 20206909 101-43000-212 Unleaded Fuel Department Invoice Amount Police Department 29.85 Police Department 7.50 37.35 Mayor & Council 13,229.25 13,229.25 141,747.00 Police Department Police Department I -- 6,499.00 Police Department 198.00 Central Services 198.00 Central Services 925.00 7,820.00 Public Works Department 6.58 Central Services 12.48 Public Works Department 37.99 Public Works Department .89 57.94 Public Works Department 1,001.64 Public Works Department 247.89 Public Works Department 1,610.83 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 6 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 107081: 2,860.36 MEDIACOM 03/13/2017 107082 03/2017-000 614-49840-329 internet-03/2017 Cable Franchise 593.50 MEDIACOM 03113/2017 107082 03/2017-000 101-41900-329 internet-03/2017 Central Services 296.75 MEDIACOM 03/13/2017 107082 03/2017-000 101-42110-329 internet-03/2017 Police Department 296.75 Total 107082: 1,187.00 MELANIE CURTIS 03/13/2017 107083 MC0301017 101-42400-439 reimb food for PC mtg-03/01/17 Building & Zoning 35.52 Total 107083: 35.52 METRO WEST INSPECTIONS S 03/13/2017 107084 JAN/2017 101-42400-310 Jan/17 Inspection Services Building & Zoning 7,446.50 Total 107084: 7,446.50 MHSRC/Range 03/13/2017 107085 629430-5559 101-42110-437 training: C.Stensrud Police Department 405.00 MHSRC/Range 03/1312017 107085 629430-5576 101-42110-437 training:SchoenherrSpencer,White,Wittke,Sonnek Police Department 750.00 MHSRC/Range 03/13/2017 107085 629430-5591 101-42110-437 training: W.Carstens, B. Beniek Police Department 810.00 Total 107085: 1,965.00 MIKE HINCK 03113/2017 107086 2017-00166 101-32510 Refund Perm it#2017-001 66-1749 North Farm Rd 92.89 Total 107086: 92.89 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 03/13/2017 107087 00004576 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Police Department 13.64 Total 107087: 13.64 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/1312017 107088 P28804 101-43000-403 John Deere #450 Parts Public Works Department 106.23 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03113/2017 107088 P28804 651-49910-402 John Deere #450 Parts Storm Water 106.23 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53191 101-43000-403 O -Ring Public Works Department 2.00 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03113/2017 107088 P53200 101-43000-403 chainsaw parts Public Works Department 64.14 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53288 101-43000-403 Oil Lines on Unit #450 Public Works Department 10.00 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53326 101-45210-403 Maintenance On Golf Course Equipment Golf Course 139.21 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53328 101-45210-403 Equipment Maint Golf Course 17.97 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53330 101-45210-403 Equipment Maint Golf Course 176.87 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53331 101-45210-403 Equipment Maint Golf Course 10.90 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 7 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 03/13/2017 107088 P53333 101-45210-403 Equipment Maint Golf Course 49.79 Total 107088: 683.34 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMEN 03/13/2017 107089 0373593 602-49450-406 2 -inch SCH80 PVC B.O.E. Pipe Sewer 197.54 Total 107089: 197.54 MN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 03/13/2017 107090 6732317 101-21710 Pera life 03/2017 224.00 Total 107090: 224.00 MTI DIST CO 03/13/2017 107091 1104737-00 101-45210-403 Equipment Maint-GC Golf Course 94.48 Total 107091: 94.48 NAVARRE HARDWARE 03/13/2017 107092 300309 101-43000-224 Streets -Sign Mounting Nuts Public Works Department 14.49 NAVARRE HARDWARE 03/13/2017 107092 300309 601-49400-404 LED Bulb Water 11.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 03/1312017 107092 300514 101-41900-401 City Hall Copier -Gorilla Glue Central Services 3.49 NAVARRE HARDWARE 03/13/2017 107092 300538 601-49400-405 Raise Water Curb Supplies Water 29.47 Total 107092: 59.44 NEWEGG INC 03/13/2017 107093 1300124046 101-41900-322 Shipping on Returned ltem(inv#1300152775) Central Services 1.99 NEWEGG INC 03/13/2017 107093 1300149799 101-41900-321 Restocking Fee -Returned Laptop (Inv#1300170379) Central Services 50.00 NEWEGG INC 03/13/2017 107093 1300156175 101-41900-221 Charger Central Services 24.65 NEWEGG INC 03/13/2017 107093 1300157473 101-41900-221 DVD Drive Central Services 39.41 NEWEGG INC 03113/2017 107093 1300169193 405-48500-575 Laptop Replacement -Olson 633.98 Total 107093: 750.03 NOVA COMMUNICATIONS 03/1312017 107094 108839 101-41900-401 Greeting Change Central Services 45.00 Total 107094: 45.00 OFFICE DEPOT 03/13/2017 107095 9059194620 101-41900-201 Monitor Central Services 223.18 OFFICE DEPOT 03/13/2017 107095 9059194630 101-41900-201 Keyboard, Mouse Central Services 73.00 OFFICE DEPOT 03/13/2017 107095 9080934380 101-41900-201 Tissue, plates, Pens, folders Central Services 132.23 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 8 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 107095 ONLINE SOLUTIONS, LLC 03/13/2017 107096 2598 405-48500-575 ONLINE SOLUTIONS, LLC 03113/2017 107096 2598 405-48500-575 ONLINE SOLUTIONS, LLC 03/13/2017 107096 2598 405-48500-575 Total 107096: Police Department 240.99 17 -Explorer Teams Cheifs Cup Reg-Szczepanik Police Department PREMIER WATER TECHNOLOGI 03/13/2017 107097 ORON003/0 101-41900-404 Total 107097: 29.99 Holster, Badge, Boots, TAC -J. Szczepanik Police Department 29.99 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 03/13/2017 107098 33167 602-49450-406 Total 107098: RANDYS SANITATION INC 03/13/2017 107099 1241681-3-F 101-41900-404 Total 107099: RDO EQUIPMENT 03113/2017 107100 P22738 101-43000-403 Total 107100: ST. PAUL POLICE DEPT - PDI 03/13/2017 107101 100013 101-42110-437 Total 107101: STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 CM275506 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 CM275617 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 CM275627 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03113/2017 107102 CM275666 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 CM275847 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03113/2017 107102 CM275848 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11244418 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11244438 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11244518 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11245045 101-42110-226 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11245148 101-42110-226 Description Department Invoice Amount 2017-CitizenServe-8 Users Subscriptions 14,400.00 2017-CitizenServe Set -Up Fee, install & training 4,800.00 2017-CitizenServe-Data Migration from PermitWork 5,000.00 Feb/1 7 -Trash Svcs 24,200.00 Water Softener -Public Works -1st half Central Services 1.124.50 Repairs LS#5 Pump Sewer 14,370.00 Refund -Used Rifle -4 Police Department 14,370.00 Feb/1 7 -Trash Svcs Central Services 288.27 Return (inv#1123661); Weapon Light Police Department 288.27 Unit #430 Public Works Department 240.99 Return (inv#11250750) Radio Holder Police Department 240.99 17 -Explorer Teams Cheifs Cup Reg-Szczepanik Police Department 55.00 55.00 Collar Insignia-Stensrud Police Department 11.98 - Refund -Used Rifle -4 Police Department 1,950.00 - Return -Holster -J. Szczepanik Police Department 59.99 - Return (inv#1123661); Weapon Light Police Department 139.99 - Return (inv#11249624) Radio Holder Police Department 45.98 - Return (inv#11250750) Radio Holder Police Department 49.99 - Shirt, Pants, Traffic Vest, Collar Insignia-Stensrud Police Department 44.50 Shirt, Pants, Collar Insignia-Stensrud Police Department 11.98 Hood -Ed Rundle (reserves) Police Department 29.99 Holster, Badge, Boots, TAC -J. Szczepanik Police Department 29.99 Nametag Cloth -J. Wittke Police Department 5.99 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11245908 101-42110-226 Shirt, Trousers, Cold Gear, Embroidery -J. Wittke Police Department 199.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11246032 101-42110-201 Batteries Police Department 59.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11246114 101-42110-226 Traffic Wand Police Department 11.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11246316 101-42110-226 Holster, TAC, Boots -J. Szczepanik Police Department 189.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03113/2017 107102 11246328 101-42110-226 Trousers & Embroidery -J. Wittke Police Department 144.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11247069 101-42110-226 Holster, TAC -J. Szczepanik Police Department 59.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11247243 101-42110-550 Replacement Strobe, preemption tube, Whele ally Ii Police Department 339.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11248115 101-42110-240 Easy Wedge, Door Wedge Police Department 124.95 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11248147 101-42110-226 Shirt & Pants-Stensrud Police Department 234.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11248301 101-42110-226 Nameplates: B. Martin, E. Ross, E. Eastman, C. Ch ristia Police Department 31.96 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11249298 101-42110-226 Name tag cloth -Will Carstens Police Department 5.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03113/2017 107102 11249404 101-42110-240 Replace Spotlight, #237, Replace Preemption syste Police Department 410.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11249624 101-42110-226 Radio Holder -Mike Wocken Police Department 45.98 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11249741 101-42110-226 Ball vest, Trauma Plate -K. Russeth Police Department 920.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11250358 101-42110-226 Uniform Shirt Carrier, Name Tag Cloth -K. Russeth Police Department 100.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11250416 101-42110-226 Weapon Light -Fischer Police Department 79.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11250520 101-42110-226 Duty Shirt, Trousers -S. Schultz Police Department 170.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11250740 101-42110-226 Radio Holder -Mike Wocken Police Department 40.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/1312017 107102 11250750 101-42110-226 Raido Holder Police Department 49.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03113/2017 107102 11251187 101-42110-226 Pants & Holster -B. Bienek Police Department 118.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11251189 101-42110-226 Belt -J. Raze Police Department 25.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11251234 101-42110-226 TAC: WSCA-J. Szczepanik Police Department 175.00 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11251282 101-42110-226 Collar Insignia-Stensrud Police Department 25.97 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11251354 101-42110-226 Boots -J. Raze Police Department 179.99 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11251571 101-42110-226 Radio Holders -6 Police Department 255.94 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 03/13/2017 107102 11252139 101-42110-226 Replace Pushbumper, Surface Mount LED Light Police Department 129.99 Total 107102: 1,997.13 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03/13/2017 107103 LIFE FEB/20 101-21710 Life Insurance Feb/2017 1,270.40 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03/13/2017 107103 LIFE MARCH 101-21710 Life Insurance March/2017 1,270.40 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03/13/2017 107103 LTD-FEB/201 101-21713 LTD Feb/2017 1,574.84 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03113/2017 107103 LTD -MARCH/ 101-21713 LTD-March/2017 1,574.84 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03/13/2017 107103 STD -3/2017 101-21714 March/1 7 -STD 513.80 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 03113/2017 107103 STD-FEB/20 101-21714 STID FEB/2017 513.80 Total 107103: 6,718.08 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL 03/13/2017 107104 INVO005127 601-49400-227 spray paint Water 148.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 2/28/2017 - 3/13/2017 Page: 10 Mar 09, 2017 11:44AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GIL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 107104: 148.00 TESSA MARCHESSAULT 03/13/2017 107105 TM030717 101-43000-489 Mailbox Replacement -3133 Casco Circle Public Works Department 45.00 Total 107105: 45.00 THE BROADWAY GROUP LLC 03/13/2017 107106 15-3789 101-22205 Escrow Refund -#15-3789 3590 North Shore Dr 2,500.00 Total 107106: 2,500.00 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 03/13/2017 107107 478334 101-41900-403 repair Garage Door East Washbay Central Services 710.75 Total 107107: 710.75 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 03/13/2017 107108 50944 101-41900-407 Janitorial service Central Services 1,435.50 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 03/13/2017 107108 50944 101-42110-407 Janitorial service Police Department 1,039.50 Total 107108: 2,475.00 VESSCOINC 03/13/2017 107109 68723 601-49400-405 Tube Element, PVC Water 562.01 Total 107109: 562.01 WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 03/13/2017 107110 0024714-280 603-49500-316 Recycling 3/2017 8,972.62 WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYC 03/13/2017 107110 0024714-280 603-39610 RMO 3/2017 715.50 - Total 107110: 8,257.12 WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFE 03/13/2017 107111 02212017 101-42110-403 Orono PD share MRAP silver/blue Paint-SWATMOD Police Department 1,520.00 Total 107111: 1,520.00 Grand Totals: 437,002.37