Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, June 11, 2018, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 1. Council Meeting Minutes of May 23, 2018 2. Council Work Session Minutes of May 23, 2018 3. Claims/Bills 4. Approval of Garbage Hauler Licenses 5. Appointment of 2018 Election Judges — Resolution 6. Appointment of 2018 Seasonal Employees 7. Approval of Promotion of Sergeant 8. Approval of Right Of Way Summary Ordinance for Publication 9. LAI 8-38 — James & Mary Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road, Final Plat — Resolution 10. LAI 8-39 — Cathie Meyer, 493 Park Avenue, Variances — Resolution 11. LAI 8-43 — LDK Homes, 1509 Long Lake Boulevard, Variances — Resolution Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Presentation 12. Hennepin County Sheriff Office Activity Report 2017 Public Works/City Engineer Report 13. Annual Public Hearing for MS4 Storm Water Permit Planning Department's Report (Planning Commission Representative — Bruce Lemke) 14. LAI 8-14 — Lake West Development o/b/o Barbara Lupient Et Al, PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, "3508" Ivy Place, Final Plat and Development Agreement Approval 15. LAI 8-40 — Matthew & Angela Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, CUP & 2nd Driveway 16. LAI 8-41 — City of Orono Text Amendment: Gate Opacity — Ordinance 17. LAI 8-42 — City of Orono Text Amendment: Notification Distance for Public Hearings — Ordinance 18. LAI 8-44 — City of Orono Comprehensive Plan 2040 Amendment Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda for Council Meeting Set for Monday, June 11, 2018, 7:00 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Mayor/Council Report City Administrator's Report City Attorney's Report Adjournment Upcoming Events 2018 06-18-18 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Richard F. Crosby II) 06-25-18 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 06-25-18 City Council Meeting, Monday 7:00 p.m. 07-02-18 Park Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. 07-04-18 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 07-09-18 City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. 07-16-18 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Aaron Printup) 07-23-18 City Council Work Session, Monday, 5:00 p.m. 07-23-18 City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard Crosby, II1, Wendy Dankey, Aaron Printup, and Victoria Seals. The following Staff members were present: City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Engineer/Public Works Director Adam Edwards, Consulting City Engineer David Martini, and City Attorney Soren Mattick. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 14, 2018 2. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES OF MAY 14, 2018 3. CLAIMSBILLS 4. APPROVAL OF RENTAL LICENSES 5. GARBAGE HAULER LICENSES 6. GOLF COURSE DRAINAGE 7. RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE UPDATE ORDINANCE NO. 207, THIRD SERIES 8. SEASONAL EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENTS 9. HIRING PART-TIME (SEASONAL) COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 10. COMPENSATION STUDY 11. #18-3997 REHKAMP LARSON, 1300 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, AMEND APPROVED PLAN — RESOLUTION NO. 6871 12. LA18-000025 — 3635 TOGO ROAD, FINAL PLAT — RESOLUTION This item has been withdrawn by the applicant. 13. LAI 8-000048 — 800 NORTH ARM, FRANZEL ADDITION, PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION — RESOLUTION NO. 6872 Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as revised, with Item No. 12 being removed. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 1 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS None PRESENTATION 15. LIFE SAVING RECOGNITION Long Lake Fire Chief Van Eyll stated on March 21, 2018, the Wayzata Police Department received a call concerning someone having trouble breathing and asked that the Long Lake Fire Department be paged once they started CPR. The Long Lake Fire Department arrived on scene and assisted with CPR. Their efforts were successful. The Long Lake Fire Department would like to recognize the following responders: Deputy Chief of Administration DJ Goman; Deputy Chief of Training Cody Farley; Fire Caption Chris Adams; Battalion Chief Shane Gardner; Assistant Chief John Hall; Firefighters Derek Lee, Shaun Rioux, Thomas Aldrich, Bryan Frank, Ryan Hoster, Blair Mileski, Ben Rasmuson; Wayzata Police Officers Brandon Haapoja and Andrew Sharratt; North RN Erick Shaft; and North Paramedic Thomas J. Boucher. Mayor Walsh, on behalf of the City of Orono, thanked the officers for their life-saving efforts. C! lkfh okl l 11130 X.I 1I kyl C17 7 14I3 ILT1Z�111 610111Zi 70HILI DI"01 Pam Meyers stated she would like to make a donation to the City of Orono on behalf of the Westonka Historical Society and Museum. Meyers presented a copy of the book "Classroom Voices" to Mayor Walsh. Meyers stated the book is filled with memories of the children who attended Westonka schools prior to 1950 and also includes a history of the schools and the formation of the Hennepin County Consolidated School District in 1915. Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to accept the book donation from the Westonka Historical Society and Museum. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT 16. EAST LONG LAKE ROAD DISPOSITION — DISCUSSION Edwards stated Staff is looking to gain guidance from the City Council on the future disposition of East Long Lake Road and to take public comment. At the present time East Long Lake Road is in an advanced state of deterioration. Edwards displayed a number of photographs depicting the condition of the southern and northern portions of the roadway. The southern 890 feet of the road is included in the 2019 road maintenance plan. The northern section of the road runs along the eastern shore of Long Lake. Portions of the roadway are becoming undermined and the pavement is crumbling. The pavement is beyond pothole repair and is subject to seasonal flooding requiring periodic closures of the roadway. Notice of tonight's meeting was sent to the affected property owners and some written comments have been received. Page 2 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. EAST LONG LAKE ROAD DISPOSITION — DISCUSSION — Continued Possible options for the northern section of the roadway are as follows: A. Reconstruct the road. This option would include rebuilding the roadway by stabilizing the lakeshore, rebuilding the subgrade, raising the roadway elevation through the lower areas, and repaving. The estimated cost of this option is $1.3 million. If this option is selected, the Council should direct Staff to conduct a feasibility study with a goal of completing the reconstruction in 2019. B. Convert road to a bike trail. This course of action would include the removal of the existing asphalt, stabilizing the lakeshore where required, construction of a 10 -foot wide multifocal trail and a turnaround feature at the northern end of the southern section. The estimated cost of this option is $500,0000, with grants being available. Edwards noted the disadvantage of this option would be the removal of a north -south transportation corridor, with traffic being pushed to Ferndale or Brown roads. C. The third option is to do nothing and to keep the road closed. Staff recommends Option B. Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. John Goldsby, 1025 Spring Hill Road, asked if the road was reconstructed whether it would be similar to the construction along Highway 112 where they removed all the trees and re -enforced the road to keep the soil in place. Edwards stated in some sections of the road the trees would need to be removed in order to shore up the soil and in other sections where the road is offset more from the lake the trees could be saved. Walsh commented the road is in a unique location, with likely runoff into the lake, and that there are a number of factors that will need to be considered. Joanne Pastel, 951 Spring Hill Road, stated even though the road is closed, cars are still going down the road. Pastel stated if the road is permanently closed, they will need to do something different than simply placing a sign there because the sign has been moved. Pastel stated since she has been living there, people have used the road as a shortcut, which has improved somewhat since Highway 112 has opened up, but that cars like to travel fast down the road. Pastel expressed concern about getting hit by a car when she walks on the road because they are going so fast. Pastel requested the City Council take that into consideration when making their decision. Walsh noted one option the City Council is considering is eliminating it as a road and making it a trail. Pastel commented it would be nice to see a bike trail. Page 3 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. EAST LONG LAKE ROAD DISPOSITION — DISCUSSION — Continued Fred Polacky, 1020 Old Long Lake Road, stated he is here to support Option B as the most environmentally sensible and cost-effective solution. Polacky indicated he has walked and driven on the road and at times when you come around a curve another car will be coming at you in the wrong lane because they are swerving potholes. In addition, closing off the north section would be a good option to help preserve the wetland and the water quality of Long Lake. Polacky stated at 324 cars per day, that is less than two cars per hour and Ferndale and Brown Road are equally useful to get around town. Polacky stated in his opinion Option B affords the most benefit to the community. Bill Dunlap, 951 Spring Hill Road, stated he has resided at his property since 1981 and that he has always envisioned the road as being a bike or walking trail. Dunlap commented it is a very beautiful area and that he supports Option B. Dunlap stated in his view $1.3 million is on the low side and the actual cost would be a lot higher. Dunlap stated the City Council should also consider the safety aspects of the road given the speed of the vehicles. The road also serves primarily as a shortcut to get to Medina and the majority of the vehicles on the road are not Orono residents. In addition, the environmental impacts need to be considered and there might be an opportunity to obtain some private donations to make it a bike/walking trail. Norm Hamman, 450 East Long Lake Road, stated their property is located directly across the street from Summit Beach and was purchased in 1966. Hamman noted he agrees with the comments made so far and that he and his family are supportive of Option B. Hamman read the following statement: "The Hamman family would like to provide the following comments regarding the disposition of the northerly section of East Long Lake Road in Orono: Our family has lived at 450 East Long Lake Road for more than 50 years. In addition to the cost considerations regarding the reconstruction of the roadway, we also have serious concerns regarding the safety of this road. Cars oftentimes travel at unsafe speeds and it can be dangerous when two cars meet each other on this narrow stretch of road. There's really no margin for error when two cars are passing each other, and also there is no space or shoulder for pedestrian traffic as well. The situation can be further made more complicated or serious when people are exiting from the Summit Park Beach onto East Long Lake Road as there is restricted visibility when exiting the park. In addition to the above-mentioned items, we encourage the City Staff to confirm whether or not there are existing easements for this road. A title search regarding our property conducted several years ago revealed that no easement for the road exists relative to our property at that point in time. Based on the costs and the other information as mentioned above, we would like to see the road closed north of 550 East Long Lake Road and we do support course of action B." Mrs. John Winston, 765 Spring Hill Road, stated she has lived on that property except for a few years since 1942. Winston commented she is sad the road cannot be what it used to be and that over the past few years the road has been allowed to deteriorate. Winston stated she is against making it into a super highway because of the speed of the cars that travel down it currently, which would make it more dangerous. Winston stated her first option would be to have it the way it used to be or else make it a trail. Winston stated she is not sure if it is possible to make the road a one-way, but that might be one option. Page 4 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 16. EAST LONG LAKE ROAD DISPOSITION — DISCUSSION — Continued Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. John Winston, 765 Spring Hill Road, recommended the road be converted to a trail, which is the recommendation of Staff. Winston stated since the road closure, bikers, hunters and fishermen have enjoyed the peacefulness of the area now that cars are no longer a challenge. A trail will improve water quality and be much less costly than reconstruction. In addition, the sharp curve has always been a hazard and cars have gone off the road and into the lake. Grants might be available to cover a portion of the trail, and with the saved money, Winston stated he would like to see some of those funds be dedicated to the carp study on Long Lake. Mayor Walsh stated he appreciates the comments of the residents and that Seals stated in her view Option C is not a good plan. Seals noted the City does not have any extra money in the road budget to give to anybody and that Option B is probably the best option. Walsh commented reconstruction of the road also does not take into account the environmental concerns and that converting the road to a trail would create a tremendous amenity for the residents of the area. Crosby stated in his view Option B is the best choice and that a public/private partnership would be a win-win. Seals moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Option B and direct Staff and the Parks Commission to develop a plan with a goal of seeking grants in 2018/2019 and converting the road to a trail in 2019/2020, with consideration being given to some parking near Summit Beach. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 17. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD (CSAH 112-CSAH 6) AWARD Edwards noted in July of 2017, the City Council authorized Bolton and Menk to complete a feasibility study for Old Crystal Bay Road. Following completion of that study, the City Council authorized Staff to initiate design work, with the preliminary design being approved on January 22, 2018. The final design was completed and approved by the State on May 9, 2018. Bid opening was on May 23, 2018. The project will consist of the reconstruction and reconfiguration of Old Crystal Bay Road between County Road 112 and County Road 6. In addition, the project will include replacement of associated water, sewer and storm water utilities. GMH Construction provided a bid for $3,073,421.24. In addition to the construction cost, Bolton and Menk provided an estimate for construction oversight for an amount not to exceed $220,000. The total cost of the project is $3,656,421.24. An amount of $901,596.57 will be funded by the Orono School District, the amount of Municipal State Aid to be received is $1,558,346.11, and $167,493.10 will come from the Community Investment Fund. The Orono School District has requested that the City initially pay for the entire project, with the District then reimbursing the City for their share of the project cost over a period of nine years at an interest rate Page 5 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 17. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD (CSAR 112-CSAH 6) AWARD — Continued of two percent. The City will provide funding for the school portion via an interfund loan from the utility funds. Since the project is a partnership between the City and the Orono School District, a cooperative agreement laying out responsibilities is required and has been provided to the City Council. Staff recommends awarding the project to GMH Construction in the amount of $3,073,421.24, approve the cooperative agreement with the Orono School District, and accept the proposal from Bolton and Menk for construction management services. Walsh commented this project has been considered for a number of years and is finally coming to fruition thanks to the efforts of the Orono School District and the City of Orono. Printup stated the cooperation between the Orono School District and the City of Orono has been instrumental in allowing this project to be undertaken. Dankey moved, Printup seconded, to award the Old Crystal Bay Road project to GMH Construction in the amount of $3,073,421.24 contingent upon the Orono School District approving the Cooperative Agreement; to approve the Cooperative Agreement between the Orono School District and the City of Orono; and to accept the proposal from Bolton and Menk for construction management services. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 18. 2019 STREET MAINTENANCE AND ENGINEERING Edwards stated as discussed at the work session earlier today, Staff is looking to line up the City's road projects for 2019. Based on the discussion, Forest Arms Lane will be reconstructed as well as East Long Lake Road South, and Tonkaview Lane and Chevy Chase Drive will get a mill and overlay in 2019. Walsh noted the total cost of the projects will be approximately $848,000 and that the City will be utilizing funds from the roads budget, revenue received from the water tower rental, and extra revenue expected to be received at the end of the year. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the 2019 Street Maintenance Plan for reconstruction of Forest Arms Lane and East Long Lake Road South and mill and overlay of Tonkaview Lane and Chevy Chase Drive, and to accept of the Bolton and Menk proposal for engineering services. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT 19. CONSIDER A PETITION TO CONVERT A PORTION OF BRACKETTS POINT ROAD FROM PRIVATE OWNERSHIP TO THE PUBLIC ROAD Barnhart noted this petition was received approximately one month ago. Based on Council's direction at the April meeting, Staff has drafted a resolution denying the request. Page 6 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 19. CONSIDER A PETITION TO CONVERT A PORTION OF BRACKETTS POINT ROAD FROM PRIVATE OWNERSHIP TO THE PUBLIC ROAD — Continued Bruce Paddock, 1500 Bracketts Point Road, noted he addressed the City Council a couple of months ago regarding his concerns with the development of the Dayton property. Paddock stated on behalf of the three property owners located on the private portion of the road, he would again renew his request to convert the private portion of the roadway to public for the following reasons: Road profile thickness and material types are consistent with the current public road standards. 2. The road is in very good condition with little evidence of wear and tear. The roadway does have curb and gutter which is in good condition and complies with public road standards. 4. The private roadway is really utilized as a public roadway thoroughfare regardless of whether the City calls it public or private. 5. The property owners located on the private portion pay the same property tax rate as the residents who live on the public portion. Paddock noted Staff's report states the private roadway is only 20 feet wide and less than the current public road standard of 28 feet. Paddock stated he personally went out there and measured it and it is actually 22 feet. Paddock stated the first 500 feet of the public portion of the road from County Road 15 to where it will tie into the new roadway is only 18 feet wide with no curb and gutter but yet that portion of the road deserves to be called public. Paddock noted the private portion is actually superior to that portion of the public road and the City has no intentions of upgrading it. Paddock noted the City resolution expressly says the private roadway width is not to city standards. In addition, the report also says the private cul-de-sac does not have a radius that is consistent to city standards. Paddock stated the private cul-de-sac radius is 45 feet and far exceeds the cul-de-sac that the City is proposing for the juncture connection of the public road to the private roadway. Again, the city road does not meet City standards but yet they are requiring the private roadway to meet those standards. Paddock noted his private cul-de-sac was approved by the fire chief at the time it was constructed and was good enough then but all of a sudden it does not meet the City's standards. Paddock stated in fairness to all the residents on Bracketts Point Road, the private section of road should be converted to public so everyone is served equally. Paddock stated if the petition is denied, the very least the City Council should do is to bring the first 500 feet of the public portion up to the standards of the private road. Crosby stated he emphasizes with Mr. Paddock but the problem with the situation is that they will be opening up Pandora's Box and everyone with a private road will want it to be converted to public. Crosby stated the City's road budget does not have enough money to handle the roads the City currently has, much less cover the cost of additional roads. Crosby stated he understands where Mr. Paddock is coming from on the taxes but that unfortunately not everything is perfect. Crosby stated the City Council is attempting to keep taxes down and at the same time fix as many roads as possible each year, but that approving this request would be opening the door to a number of other similar requests, which the City Page 7 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 19. CONSIDER A PETITION TO CONVERT A PORTION OF BRACKETTS POINT ROAD FROM PRIVATE OWNERSHIP TO THE PUBLIC ROAD — Continued simply cannot afford. Printup indicated he would echo Council Member Crosby's comments. Printup stated the private road concept is unique to Orono and was created due to financial reasons. Seals stated she would concur. Seals asked whether the City has any plans to upgrade the public portion of the roadway. Edwards indicated there are not for the foreseeable future and that the City's list of projects is based on the condition of the road and not necessarily the width of the road. Edwards noted the City has a number of roads that do not meet city standards. Crosby commented the residents on that portion of the road also may not appreciate the road being widened since it could infringe on their properties. Dankey stated she used to live on a private road and that she had concerns about the cost to fix something since there were only two people on the road. Dankey stated the private road concept was new to her at the time she purchased her new house and that this is a unique situation. Dankey stated unfortunately the City is not in a position to take over a number of private roads. Paddock stated he understands the Council's concerns regarding the costs but that they have to recognize that his private roadway has been built in the last nine years and that per the engineer it does not need any additional repair. Paddock stated the first 500 feet of the public roadway is in terrible condition, which is before the heavy construction equipment goes through. Paddock stated those 12 properties on the public portion probably generate over a million dollars in tax revenue and that he would even be willing to pay an assessment to fix that portion of the road. Paddock stated he wants the road to be commensurate to the high property taxes that the residents on Bracketts Point pay. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. , a Resolution Denying the Petition to Convert a Portion of Bracketts Point Road from Private Ownership to the Public Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Crosby stated he hopes everyone had a wonderful Memorial Day and that everyone remembered the great sacrifices countless men and women have made for their country. Crosby thanked the members of the military for their service. Printup stated tonight's Council meeting was important given the discussion regarding the Old Crystal Bay Road project and that partnership that was formed between the City and the School District. Seals reported she visited Big Island this weekend and that there were tons of people enjoying the park. Seals noted in the coming weeks Home Depot will be on the Island and will be working on rehabbing the Visitor Center. Page 8 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT — Continued Walsh noted Home Depot is providing money and volunteers to the project and that it is a great public- private partnership. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Rief noted he will be meeting with staff leadership to discuss the upcoming budget and that a preliminary budget will be presented to the City Council at their June work session. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 20. 1440-1442 SHORELINE DRIVE RENTAL LICENSE Mattick noted at the last City Council meeting there was discussion about this particular rental license and that the Council elected to table it to allow Staff time to research the history of the property and determine what approvals and requirements existed for the property. Mattick stated there have been a number of approvals granted for the property over the years and that he has attempted to break it down into two components. The first one is the rental license application. Mattick stated when it comes to licensing, the law says if the applicant meets those requirements, the Council has little discretion to say no to it. At the time the ordinance was drafted, those requirements were put forth, and the review shows that they do meet those requirements. Issues discussed as part of the rental license application related to parking on the site and the business use of the properties. Mattick stated the applicants meet the parking criteria under the business terms and there is nothing that prohibits someone from double counting those parking spots since all the Code requires is two parking spots. Mattick stated there are multiple approvals on the property that discuss parking. The most recent approval was the conditional use permit granted in 2011. At that time the City performed an analysis of the parking and found that per the code as it existed in 2011, it would be necessary to have 70 parking stalls. Based on the parking plan submitted, they have demonstrated 76 total stalls available and another potential 5 stalls. Mattick stated if the number of slips is consistent with what they had in 2011, then they have demonstrated sufficient parking. Mattick recommended the rental license be approved tonight and that it be reviewed annually as the City would normally do. Mattick stated the bigger issue on the property is the amount of activity that is occurring as it relates to the marina, the boat sales, and the Your Boat Club. The main complaints revolved around the parking associated with those businesses and late-night deliveries. Mattick stated a certain amount of noise is associated with those activities that is unavoidable and it becomes an issue of whether they are in violation of any of the prior approvals. There are basically three primary guiding documents for the property that were discussed at the last meeting. Mattick stated he pulled the record against the property from the County and a lot of the conditions are typical for this type of business. The City, through specific approvals, has allowed parking on those two residential properties since 2011 and it had been done historically prior to that. Mattick Page 9 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 20. 1440-1442 SHORELINE DRIVE RENTAL LICENSE — Continued indicated he was not able to go through and start pulling all the site plans that have been approved as part of the resolution and review those, but that it might be better for Staff to do that. Mattick stated if parking is the issue, it appears the lots have adequate parking. As it relates to hours of operation or landscaping, etc., that is something Staff can look into as part of the normal course of reviewing conditional use permits. Mattick stated based on the complaints and the discussion, there appears to be good reasons to review the conditional use permit. Mattick suggested the list of complaints that was to be compiled by Matt Johnson be given to Staff to review. Crosby asked how many boat slips are currently on the property. Mattick stated he does not have the answer to that at this time. Mattick stated even if the number of slips has increased from 2011, the property received a variance from the parking by four stalls. In 2011, it was indicated there were 97 slips on the water, but that six of them were devoted to retail sales, display and service, which left 91 slips. The parking need was determined by taking those 91 slips and multiplying it by .6, which came to 54 stalls. Eight additional stalls were required for the retail sales, three stalls were required for the building, and four parking stalls were required for employees, which adds up to 50. Mattick stated the resolution showed that on the Tanager lake side there were 24 stalls at 1444 Shoreline, 26 stalls at 1440-1442 Shoreline, 26 stalls on the Brown's Bay side of County Road 15, and an additional five stalls located in a triangular granular parking area, which amounts to 76 parking stalls. It was also contemplated that there were potentially five additional parking stalls not previously approved for parking. Crosby asked if Staff has verified the parking. Crosby stated if it is occupied by something else, such as storage, it should not be counted as a parking stall. Mattick stated that was one of the concerns that was discussed at the last meeting and Staff would be able to go out there and verify the parking stalls. Mattick stated the resolution that was approved says that at 1444 Shoreline there were 14 marked parking stalls but the 26 parking stalls are unmarked. Crosby stated if it is not being utilized as a parking stall, that would be a concern and would be a violation of the intent. Mattick agreed that if it is being used for storage, it cannot be used for parking. Crosby stated the rental license is in conjunction with the parking and that the City still does not definitively know the answer to that question. Mattick stated each of the two residential properties have the required two stalls for parking. If the stalls are being double counted for the business, Orono's Code does not distinguish that, which may be where there is some issue. Walsh stated he would like to see a list of all the different approvals granted on the property over the years. Walsh stated the rental license application is not joined with the business side of the site and that they can deal with the rental license application separately. Page 10 of 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 20. 1440-1442 SHORELINE DRIVE RENTAL LICENSE — Continued Crosby stated in his view they are related because of the commercial parking that is going on at the properties. Walsh stated the parking does not need to be differentiated based on the code. Mattick stated it would be hard to do an inspection of the site without going through the approvals so Staff knows exactly what to be looking for. Mattick noted the approvals do talk about no commercial activity occurring on the residential properties outside of the parking. Mattick stated the issues appear to be related to the business and that the Council can move forward on the rental license application. Walsh stated once the list of approvals is complied, the Council can then have a better discussion about what is going on at the site. Mattick stated part of the problem is that some of the issues on the site are fluid and do not occur all the time. Barnhart stated if the City Attorney compiles that list, he can then go through the site plans. Printup moved, Seals seconded, to approve the rental license for 1440-1442 Shoreline Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 8:37 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 11 of 11 Orono City Council Work Session Tuesday, May 29, 2018 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard F. Crosby II, Wendy Dankey, Aaron Printup and Victoria Seals. Representing staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Finance Director Ron Olson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Adam Edwards, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart and City Clerk Anna Carlson. Meeting Start Time: 5:00 p.m. 1. 2019 Street Maintenance, Engineering & Budgeting Director of Public Works/City Engineer Adam Edwards began with a short presentation of 2019 Street Maintenance plan. There was discussion in regards to budget and prioritizing the streets listed on the Street Maintenance plan presented. The roads that will be addressed first at this time will be East Long Lake Road (South), Tonkaview Lane, and Chevy Chase Drive. City Administrator Dustin Rief mentioned that he will forward the draft budget to everyone. Rief noted that the preliminary discussion for budget will be discussed at the June 22nd Council Work Session. The preliminary budget will then be presented in July at a City Council meeting. 2. Double Fee Discussion Director of Community Development Jeremy Barnhart began discussion regarding an issue connected to a contractor that did not have to pay double fees for a project that was started prior to an approved permit. Barnhart also noted that he uses his discretion as needed when it comes to enforcement of double fees. Walsh mentioned that he understands the customer service that had been provided at that time with that project. Council Member Victoria Seals indicated that she struggles with the gray area on the subject and at the fact that double fees is based on a judgement call. Walsh noted that the issue was caught early and mitigated quickly enough that it really wasn't an issue. Council Member Richard F. Crosby Il, mentioned that he understands the reasoning behind the judgement call and hopes that there was at least mention of a reprimand about the issue to eliminate any future instances. Council Member Wendy Dankey mentioned that a verbal reprimand should be given if they are going to be able to proceed without double fees. Seals noted that if Barnhart was willing to take that on then he would have her support to make judgement calls. Crosby agreed and noted that repeated behavior for the same issue should not be acceptable. Walsh agrees that Barnhart should use discretion as needed. Walsh mentioned that not all contractors know for sure if they need to pull permits because every city is different. Barnhart does want his staff to be strict on the deadline and appreciates the support from the City Council on this. 3. Committees, Boards & Commissions Discussion Seals began discussion about the item, she has heard that it is a hard to get people to serve on commissions. Seals asked if alternates should be able to serve in vacant spots as part of the quorum. Seals noted that it would benefit the alternates because it would help them gain experience. Alternates are fully trained to serve so they should be able to sit at the seat during the meeting. It would benefit their training and also get them more engaged. Dankey asked if commissioners let other members know if they will not be making it to the meeting. Barnhart mentioned that we normally ask for attendance the week prior to the meeting. Rief asked if we need to adopt a formal policy for commission members. Walsh does not see a need to have anything formal and also mentioned that possibly making it a requirement to attend a certain percent of meetings could be an option. Rief would like to add a term limit to Parks Commission. There was discussion regarding adding term limits to the Parks Commission and collectively the group agreed that it would be a good idea as long as the terms are staggered. Rief noted that the City has only one standing committee and in other places that he has been they have multiple committees like Finance, Public Safety, etc. Rief mentioned that it is a way to engage council at new levels. Walsh would like a Finance Committee and would like to be involved in it to get more understanding and engagement. Rief would also like to organize a Public Works Committee. Both Walsh and Seals would like to be involved with that committee. Seals also mentioned that she would like Mark Kral to come to one of the City Council meetings for a LWDC update. Meeting End Time: 5:58 p.m. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 3 Item Description: Claims/Bills Date: June 11, 2018 Presenter: Maggie Ung, Agenda Consent Agenda Accountant Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 109639 to 109729, totaling $260,802.52. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment #109663 CivicPlus Inc. $14,888.00 Payment for new website setup and annual website fee. #109689 Loadometer $9,790.00 Payment for purchase of 2 Haenni wheel load weighers. #109695 Midway Ford $59,983.68 Payment for two new trucks, Unit 610 and 210, for Public Works. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits Exhibit A. Check Register Prepared By: ALM Reviewed By: -1 Approved By: -' V City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 06/11/2018 109639 20849 101-45210-404 Golf Well Electrical Work Golf Course 485.22 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 06/11/2018 109639 20872 101-45210-404 Golf Well Electrical Work Golf Course 819.21 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 06/11/2018 109639 20873 101-45210-404 Golf Well Electrical Work Golf Course 320.40 Total 109639: 1,624.83 Advance Auto Parts 06/11/2018 109640 6974-321998 701-49800-221 Hitch's for Towing Trailer & Generator 232.72 Advance Auto Parts 06/11/2018 109640 6974-322147 701-49800-221 Road Hazard Warning Triangles 50.34 Total 109640: 283.06 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 06/11/2018 109641 358546497 101-41900-413 CH Copier Lease 5/20/18-6/20/18 Central Services 1,412.75 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 06/11/2018 109641 358570505 101-42110-413 Police Copier 5/20/18 - 6/20/18 Police Department 622.21 Total 109641: 2,034.96 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 06/11/2018 109642 INV168385 101-42110-401 Printers 5/10/18-6/09/18 Police Department 91.86 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 06/11/2018 109642 INV168385 101-41900-401 Printers 5/10/18-6/09/18 Central Services 91.86 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 06/11/2018 109642 INV168385 602-49450-401 Printers 5/10/18-6/09/18 Sewer 45.93 Total 109642: 229.65 ALLSTREAM 06/11/2018 109643 15358257 101-42110-321 Phone service Police Department 306.18 ALLSTREAM 06/11/2018 109643 15358257 101-41900-321 Phone Service Central Services 428.65 ALLSTREAM 06/11/2018 109643 15358257 601-49400-321 Phone Service Water 71.44 ALLSTREAM 06/11/2018 109643 15358257 602-49450-321 Phone Service Sewer 214.32 Total 109643: 1,020.59 American Environmental LLC 06/11/2018 109644 961 602-49450-406 CCTV Inspection of Sewer Sewer 750.00 Total 109644: 750.00 AMY SWANSON 06/11/2018 109645 052418 101-42110-437 First Responder Refresher Police Department 13.13 Total 109645: 13.13 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUT 06/11/2018 109646 16255 101-41900-319 06/18 -Insurance admin fee Central Services 491.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Total 109647: BCA TRAINING & DEVELOPMEN 06/11/2018 109648 052518 Total 109648: Department Invoice Amount 101-42110-437 Synthetic Drugs/Fentanyl Officer Training, T White Police Department BIFFS INC Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 101-45200-415 Summit Beach BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678087 101-45200-415 Hackberry Park Total 109646: 06/11/2018 109649 W678088 101-45210-415 Golf Restroom ASPEN EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109647 10190649 701-49800-402 Repair Unit #426 Underbody Plow ASPEN EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109647 10190836 405-48500-550 Lift Gate, Unit #210 ASPEN EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109647 10190838-A 405-48500-550 Snow Plow, Unit #610 GC ASPEN EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109647 10190838-B 405-48500-550 Tool Box and Install #610 Total 109647: BCA TRAINING & DEVELOPMEN 06/11/2018 109648 052518 Total 109648: Department Invoice Amount 101-42110-437 Synthetic Drugs/Fentanyl Officer Training, T White Police Department BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678085 101-45200-415 Bederwood Park BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678086 101-45200-415 Summit Beach BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678087 101-45200-415 Hackberry Park BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678088 101-45210-415 Golf Restroom BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678089 101-45200-415 Crystal Bay Playground BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678090 101-45200-415 Navarre Playground BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678091 101-45200-415 French Creek Preserve BIFFS INC 06/11/2018 109649 W678092 101-45200-415 Lurton Park Total 109649 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 BRANDON MAURER 06/11/2018 109650 042018 601-49400-437 Grand Rapid Water Test 601-49400-437 Grand Rapid Water Test Meal 602-49450-437 Waste Water License Fee 602-49450-437 Waste Water Test Fee 601-49400-437 Class D Water 601-49400-437 Water License Fee Parks Parks Parks Golf Course Parks Parks Parks Parks Water Water Sewer Sewer Water Water Total 109650: BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 06/11/2018 109651 WO -387725- 101-41900-201 Office Supplies Central Services Total 109651: CALIBRE PRESS 06/11/2018 109652 60108 101-42110-437 Read, Recognize, Respond Training J. Dembouski Police Department 491.00 4,888.00 4,265.00 1,785.00 160.00 125.00 62.78 92.50 160.00 62.50 141.70 7.36 45.00 55.00 32.00 149.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 109652: CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P 06/11/2018 109653 2111882 101-45210-091 beer for resale Total 109653 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 051418-1 101-41110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 051618 101-41410-437 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 051718 101-41410-437 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052118 101-45210-221 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052618 101-42110-402 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052918 101-42110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052918-1 101-41110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052918-2 101-41110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 052918-3 101-41110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 053018 101-41900-221 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 053118 101-42110-439 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 060418 101-42400-221 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 06/11/2018 109654 1200885107 101-42110-226 Total 109654: CARGILL SALT 06/11/2018 109655 2904043556 101-43000-224 CARGILL SALT 06/11/2018 109655 2904056261 101-43000-224 CARGILL SALT 06/11/2018 109655 2904068704 101-43000-224 CARGILL SALT 06/11/2018 109655 2904093095 101-43000-224 Total 109655 CECE S SIGNS 06/11/2018 109656 7673 405-48500-550 CECE S SIGNS 06/11/2018 109656 7726 701-49800-221 CECE S SIGNS 06/11/2018 109656 7726 101-43000-224 Total 109656: Description Golf Course Department Cookies for CC Meeting 5/14/18 Mayor & Council Parking Early Bird @ Center Village for Election Trai Elections Parking for Election Training Elections Irrigation Pipe Fittings Golf Course Canaash for #235 Police Department Lunch for Sgt. Selection Process Boards 9 People Police Department Food for 5/29 WS & Cookies for 5/29 Meeting Mayor & Council Food for 5/29 WS Mayor & Council Food for 5/29 WS Mayor & Council Replace Dell Docking Station/Key Board for Council Central Services Lunch @ Lake Area - Emergency Mgmt Police Department Car Charge Plugs for Inspectors' iPads Building & Zoning Voice Recorders for PD Investigators Police Department Treated Road Salt Non Treated Road Salt Treated Road Salt Treated Road Salt Graphics for 610, 210 Graphics for 427, 431, 428, 708 Signs for PW Storage Area Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Page: 3 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice Amount 149.00 342.30 6.99 13.00 25.00 7.33 13.00 118.48 13.98 13.99 59.00 98.00 17.94 25.98 195.56 1,793.15 1,528.91 1,728.77 6,773.75 285.00 114.00 120.00 CEMSTONE 06/11/2018 109657 381966 101-45200-404 Rebar for Brush Site Guard Shack Parks 60.00 CEMSTONE 06/11/2018 109657 C1891621 405-48500-520 Brush Site Concrete Pad 666.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 109657: CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 062018 602-49450-381 LS #2 Generator 4/18-5/17/18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 52518 601-49400-381 Gas 4/20-5/18/18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 52518 602-49450-381 Gas 4/20-5/18/18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 52518 101-41900-381 Gas 4/20-5/18/18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 52518 101-42110-381 Gas 4/20-5/18/18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 06/11/2018 109658 52518 101-45210-381 Gas 4/20-5/18/18 Total 109658: CENTURY LINK 06/11/2018 109659 051918 101-45210-321 GC phone/internet 5/19-6/18/18 Total 109659: CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/11/2018 109660 0015681 101-42110-402 #250 service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/11/2018 109660 0015688 101-42110-402 #242 Service CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 06/11/2018 109660 0015689 101-42110-402 #251 service Total 109660: CINTAS CORPORATION 06/11/2018 109661 4006215516 101-43000-226 Uniforms CINTAS CORPORATION 06/11/2018 109661 4006424635 101-43000-226 Uniforms Total 109661: CITY OF WAYZATA 06/11/2018 109662 051718 101-20807 2018 Sewer Connection - 850 Wayzata Blvd Total 109662: CivicPlus Inc. 06/11/2018 109663 172892 614-49840-329 CivicPlus Website Setup Total 109663: CLIFTON LARSON ALLEN LLP 06/11/2018 109664 1840533 101-41900-301 2017 Audit Services Total 109664: COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 06/11/2018 109665 180531 101-43000-224 blacktop for patching Department Sewer Water Sewer Central Services Police Department Golf Course Golf Course Police Department Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Cable Franchise Central Services Public Works Department Page: 4 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice A-- 726.00 -- 726.00 412.03 197.84 163.89 43.70 337.32 63.96 4,750.00 4,750.00 1,033.03 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Page: 5 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 109665: 1,033.03 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING 06/11/2018 109666 6989 101-45200-319 Barge to Big Island - mower Parks 600.00 Total 109666: 600.00 DAVE KLITZKE 06/11/2018 109667 053018 101-41500-331 Mound School Finance Department 7.63 Total 109667: 7.63 David Knaeble 06/11/2018 109668 060618 101-22205 Escrow Refund #18-3994 3635 Togo Road 5,000.00 Total 109668: 5,000.00 Detor, Elizabeth & Lucas 06/11/2018 109669 060618 101-22205 Escrow Refund #14-3657 & 2014-00513 1065 Fern 2,500.00 Total 109669: 2,500.00 DIAMOND MOWERS INC. 06/11/2018 109670 0141621 -IN 701-49800-224 Unit 450 Flail Mower 66.66 Total 109670: 66.66 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/11/2018 109671 599738 101-41900-352 Public Ordinance #206 Central Services 59.60 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/11/2018 109671 600041 101-41900-352 Admin Vacancy Post Central Services 299.85 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/11/2018 109671 600042 101-45210-352 CllubhouseAttendant NewsaperAd Golf Course 242.50 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/11/2018 109671 601778 651-49910-352 SWPPP Notice Storm Water 23.84 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 06/11/2018 109671 602100 101-45210-352 Cllubhouse Attendant NewsaperAd Golf Course 92.50 Total 109671: 718.29 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC. 06/11/2018 109672 343733 101-42110-403 siren maint 07/01/18-12/31/18 Police Department 1,107.00 Total 109672: 1,107.00 FASTENAL 06/11/2018 109673 MNPLY1026 101-43000-224 Banner Install Public Works Department 253.00 Total 109673: 253.00 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/11/2018 109674 3270-403721 701-49800-224 Fuse #450 4.29 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 06/11/2018 109674 3270-404253 101-42110-221 Squad Headlight Bulbs Police Department Total 109674: Geocell LLC 06/11/2018 109675 060318 101-42110-437 Cellphone Investigations Training - J. Barnes Police Department Total 109675: Gilbertson, Weldon 06/11/2018 109676 060618 101-22205 Escrow Refund #2018-00291 684 Tonkawa Rd Total 109676: GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA 06/11/2018 109677 3595207441 101-45210-092 beverages for concessions resale -GC Golf Course Total 109677: HEALTH PARTNERS 06/11/2018 109678 81220453 101-15998 Health Insurance 6/2018 HEALTH PARTNERS 06/11/2018 109678 81220453 101-21706 Health Insurance 6/2018 HEALTH PARTNERS 06/11/2018 109678 81220453 101-42110-135 Health Insurance 6/2018 Police Department Total 109678: Henn county Community Correcti 06/11/2018 109679 1000111096 101-45200-404 STS Charges - Park/Utility Maint. Parks Total 109679: HENNEPIN COUNTY INFOR TE 06/11/2018 109680 1000111508 101-41900-319 Network Support 06-2018 Central Services Total 109680: HERC U LIFT 06/11/2018 109681 R047288 101-43000-415 Lift Devise For Flags/Banners Install Public Works Department Total 109681: JACKIE YOUNG 06/11/2018 109682 050218 101-41300-319 CC meetings 4/18 Administration JACKIE YOUNG 06/11/2018 109682 050218 101-42400-319 PC Meeting 4/18 Building & Zoning JACKIE YOUNG 06/11/2018 109682 060418 101-41300-319 CC meetings 5/18 Administration JACKIE YOUNG 06/11/2018 109682 060418 101-42400-319 PC Meeting 5/18 Building & Zoning JACKIE YOUNG 06/11/2018 109682 060418 101-45200-319 Park Meeting 5/18 Parks Page: 6 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice Amount 6,176.50 50,653.00 2,572.50 2,572.50 51.00 51.00 1,026.05 380.00 240.00 355.00 190.00 165.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Page: 7 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 50.30 1,606.76 1,606.76 Police Department 13.79 Total 109682: 13.79 Police Department 57.96 57.96 JESSICAWERDER 06/11/2018 109683 051618 101-42110-437 PLEAA Spring Conference Total 109683: 200.00 Public Works Department 200.00 2,417.47 JH LARSON COMPANY 06/11/2018 109684 JH 601-49400-405 fuses Total 109684: 139.84 Police Department 967.02 Johnson, Susan 06/11/2018 109685 UB REFUND 999-10015 Refund UB - 2845 Wear Circle/4-828451-00 Total 109685: JOSH NEEDHAM 06/11/2018 109686 052418 101-42110-437 1st Responder Training - Lunch Total 109686: KYLE KIRSCHNER 06/11/2018 109687 052618 101-42110-489 Xerxes Food Total 109687: LANO EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109688 03-560573 101-43000-415 Ashpalt Planner LANO EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109688 03-562722 701-49800-224 S570 AC Compressor Unit 452 LANO EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109688 03-564129 601-49400-221 2018 Virnig Pallet Fork LANO EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109688 03-564129 602-49450-221 2018 Virnig Pallet Fork LANO EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109688 03-564129 101-43000-221 2018 Virnig Pallet Fork Total 109688: LOADOMETER 06/11/2018 109689 264 101-42110-440 Wheel Load Weighers Total 109689: LUBE TECH ESI 06/11/2018 109690 1164028 101-43000-224 Hand Soap - 1 Case Total 109690: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 06/11/2018 109691 20753625 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel Page: 7 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Department Invoice Amount 1,330.00 Police Department 31.61 31.61 Water 50.30 50.30 1,606.76 1,606.76 Police Department 13.79 13.79 Police Department 57.96 57.96 Public Works Department 1,125.00 692.47 Water 200.00 Sewer 200.00 Public Works Department 200.00 2,417.47 Police Department 9,790.00 9,790.00 Public Works Department 139.84 139.84 Police Department 967.02 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 06/11/2018 109691 20753626 701-49800-212 Diesel Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 06/11/2018 109691 20753639 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel Total 109691: MARGARET UNG 06/11/2018 109692 052018 101-41500-331 Mileage 5/4-5/24/18 Total 109692: MEDIACOM 06/11/2018 109693 052118 614-49840-329 Internet 6/1/18-6/30/18 MEDIACOM 06/11/2018 109693 052118 101-41900-329 Internet 6/1/18-6/30/18 MEDIACOM 06/11/2018 109693 052118 101-42110-329 Internet 6/1/18-6/30/18 Total 109693: METRO WEST INSPECTIONS S 06/11/2018 109694 1516 101-42400-310 Inspection Services April 2018 Total 109694: MIDWAY FORD 06/11/2018 109695 117435 405-48500-550 2018 Ford F350 Unit 610 MIDWAY FORD 06/11/2018 109695 117436 405-48500-550 2018 Ford F350 Unit 210 Total 109695: MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109696 P67511 101-43000-403 Saw Blades for Cutoff Saw TS420 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109696 P67511 602-49450-403 Saw Blades for Cutoff Saw TS420 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109696 P67539 101-43000-403 TS420 Cutoff Saw MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 06/11/2018 109696 P68002 101-43000-240 Replacement Hand Blower Patch Truck Total 109696: MN DEPT OF HEALTH 06/11/2018 109697 756949 101-45210-489 Hospitality Fee Total 109697: MOUND TRUE VALUE 06/11/2018 109698 152664 101-42110-404 Toilet Seat Total 109698: MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/11/2018 109699 1165451-00 101-45210-223 Practice Green Flags Department Police Department Finance Department Cable Franchise Central Services Police Department Building & Zoning Public Works Department Sewer Public Works Department Public Works Department Golf Course Police Department Golf Course Page: 8 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice Amount 739.23 1,978.71 3,684.96 23.98 23.98 593.50 296.75 296.75 1,187.00 8,334.25 8,334.25 29,991.84 29,991.84 59,983.68 21.88 21.87 1.66 279.95 325.36 40.00 28.99 28.99 45.33 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 9 Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/11/2018 109699 1166227-00 101-45210-403 Greens Mower Repair Golf Course 153.66 Total 109699: 198.99 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATI 06/11/2018 109700 00309028 101-41900-352 City Code Updates Central Services 176.00 Total 109700: 176.00 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 309985 101-45210-223 Clubhouse Cleaning Supplies Golf Course 19.86 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310078 101-43000-224 Docks, 610 Plow #'s Soap for Dishes @ PW Public Works Department 16.60 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310148 101-43000-226 PPE Gloves Public Works Department 17.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310187 101-45200-225 Big Island Supplies Parks 64.45 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310209 101-43000-226 PPE Gloves Public Works Department 13.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310352 101-45200-225 Work Gloves Parks 16.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310356 601-49400-240 Utility Knife/Shear/PWR Gear Water 36.48 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310356 602-49450-240 Utility Knife/Shear/PWR Gear Sewer 36.48 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310387 101-45200-404 Navarre Water Hydrant Repair Parks 6.49 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310395 101-45200-404 Navarre Water Hydrant Repair Parks 13.99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310417 101-45210-223 Mulch Golf Course 67.35 NAVARRE HARDWARE 06/11/2018 109701 310451 101-45210-223 Clubhouse Cleaning Supplies Golf Course 44.40 Total 109701: 355.07 NCPERS MINNESOTA 06/11/2018 109702 6732618 101-21710 Pera life 06/2018 208.00 Total 109702: 208.00 NEWEGG INC 06/11/2018 109703 1301130703 101-41900-221 Monitor- UB/Payroll Clerk Central Services 279.98 NEWEGG INC 06/11/2018 109703 1301345092 101-42110-221 PD Laptop for C. Fischer Police Department 619.00 NEWEGG INC 06/11/2018 109703 1301356531 101-41900-221 Spare Keyboards & Monitors Central Services 276.28 NEWEGG INC 06/11/2018 109703 1301357682 101-41900-221 Spare Mice Central Services 26.73 Total 109703: 1,201.99 NORTHERN SPECIALITIES INC 06/11/2018 109704 00084242 405-48500-520 Brush Site Fence/Gate 1,240.00 Total 109704: 1,240.00 NozzTeq 06/11/2018 109705 NT -06-11991 602-49450-227 Nozzle for Vactor 713 & 711 Sewer 679.50 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Page: 10 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 329.59 165.00 165.00 Central Services 1,500.00 Total 109705: OFFICE DEPOT 06/11/2018 109706 1393254640 101-41900-201 Ink OFFICE DEPOT 06/11/2018 109706 13932561100 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 06/11/2018 109706 1393256120 101-41900-201 Pens Total 109706: OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE INC 06/11/2018 109707 616954 701-49800-403 Annual Hoist Inspection Total 109707: ONLINE SOLUTIONS, LLC 06/11/2018 109708 2964 101-41900-416 2018-CitizenServe-1 Users Subscriptions Total 109708: Perry, Christopher 06/11/2018 109709 060618 101-22205 Escrow Refund LA#18-000049 1125 Hunter Drive Total 109709: PIRTEK 06/11/2018 109710 S2717343.00 701-49800-224 Hydraulic Hose adaptor, Unit #450 Total 109710: RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 06/11/2018 109711 051918 101-41900-404 Garbage Service RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 06/11/2018 109711 051918 101-45200-404 Garbage Service RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 06/11/2018 109711 051918 101-45210-404 Garbage Service RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 06/11/2018 109711 051918SCU 603-49500-442 April/2018-Spring City Clean Up Day Total 109711: Reed Wholesale & OCS 06/11/2018 109712 9494 101-45210-093 concessions Resale Total 109712: Reinders Inc. 06/11/2018 109713 3054407-00 101-45210-223 Turf Pesticide Reinders Inc. 06/11/2018 109713 3054408-00 101-45210-223 Turf Pesticide Reinders Inc. 06/11/2018 109713 3054409-00 101-45210-223 MDA Pesticide/ACRRASurchard Page: 10 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Department Invoice Amount Parks 679.50 Central Services 204.99 Central Services 104.82 Central Services 19.78 329.59 165.00 165.00 Central Services 1,500.00 1,500.00 275.00 275.00 3.18 Central Services 316.22 Parks 403.95 Golf Course 68.05 4,635.62 Golf Course 245.70 245.70 Golf Course 592.73 Golf Course 684.55 Golf Course 1.48 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Page: 11 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount Total 109713: 1,278.76 Salden,Chris 06/11/2018 109714 685001 701-49800-240 Tool Box for Shop 3,500.00 Total 109714: 3,500.00 SOUTHVIEW DESIGN 06/11/2018 109715 060618 101-22205 ESCROW REFUND -#2017-01526 1,000.00 Total 109715: 1,000.00 STA SAFE LOCKSMITH 06/11/2018 109716 00207802 101-41900-404 Repair Lock on Council Exterior Door Central Services 124.80 Total 109716: 124.80 T W TUPY INC 06/11/2018 109717 053118 602-49450-223 Rock for Backfilling & Shouldering Rds, Water, Sew Sewer 825.80 T W TUPY INC 06/11/2018 109717 053118 601-49400-223 Rock for Backfilling & Shouldering Rds, Water, Sew Water 825.80 T W TUPY INC 06/11/2018 109717 053118 101-43000-224 Rock for Backfilling & Shouldering Rds, Water, Sew Public Works Department 825.80 T W TUPY INC 06/11/2018 109717 053118 651-49910-223 Rock for Backfilling & Shouldering Rds, Water, Sew Storm Water 825.80 Total 109717: 3,303.20 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI 06/11/2018 109718 052318 101-41600-306 Prosecution Services -05/2018 Law/Legal Services 2,716.38 Total 109718: 2,716.38 THE HARTFORD 06/11/2018 109719 062018 101-21713 LTD 6/2018 1,566.54 Total 109719: 1,566.54 THE HOME DEPOT 06/11/2018 109720 10307 101-45210-221 Clubhouse Gutter Repair Golf Course 382.38 THE HOME DEPOT 06/11/2018 109720 3011621 101-45200-223 Brush Site Shed Repair Parks 61.85 THE HOME DEPOT 06/11/2018 109720 3011707 101-45200-225 Big Island Ramps Parks 37.57 THE HOME DEPOT 06/11/2018 109720 4011351 101-45200-221 Bederwood RR Repair Parks 547.97 Total 109720: 1,029.77 TRI K SERVICES 06/11/2018 109721 060518 101-43000-224 Black Dirt Public Works Department 44.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 109721: TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 06/11/2018 109722 504798 101-41900-404 PW south garage door repair TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 06/11/2018 109722 506568 101-45210-404 Shop Garage Door Repair Total 109722: Ugorets Properties LLC 06/11/2018 109723 060618 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2500 Shadywood Road Total 109723: VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 06/11/2018 109724 59558 101-41900-407 Janitorial service VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 06/11/2018 109724 59558 101-42110-407 Janitorial service Total 109724: VERIZON WIRELESS 06/11/2018 109725 9807832185 602-49450-321 Cell Phones 5/24/18-6/23/18 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/11/2018 109725 9807832185 601-49400-321 Cell Phones 5/24/18-6/23/18 Total 109725: Warning Lites of MN 06/11/2018 109726 36 101-43000-224 Speed Bumps Crystal Bay Rd Warning Lites of MN 06/11/2018 109726 37 101-43000-224 Signs & Speed Bumps Warning Lites of MN 06/11/2018 109726 38 101-43000-224 E. Long Lake Road Closure Warning Lites of MN 06/11/2018 109726 39 101-43000-224 McCulley & Watertown Signs Total 109726: WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 06/04/2018 109635 811198 701-49800-402 Repair Bobcat tire & Replace Unit 427 tire Total 109635: WILLIAMS TOWING 06/11/2018 109727 148321 231-45650-436 tow case #18004959 Total 109727: Yamaha Golf & Utility 06/11/2018 109728 01-205151 101-45210-415 Golf Cart Repair Department Central Services Golf Course Central Services Police Department Sewer Water Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Golf Course Page: 12 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice 44.00 130.00 148.00 2,475.00 27.87 27.86 55.73 1,777.80 235.00 2,435.13 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 5/30/2018 - 6/11/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 109728: YAMAHA MOTOR CORP. 06/11/2018 109729 637970 101-45210-415 Golf Cart Rental Golf Course Total 109729: Grand Totals: Page: 13 Jun 07, 2018 09:36AM Invoice Amount 2,435.13 3,294.00 3,294.00 260,802.52 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Approval of Garbage Hauler Licenses Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the Garbage Hauler Licenses for the license period of June 11, 2018 to May 31, 2019. 2. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Garbage Hauler licenses as listed in Exhibit A for the license period of June 11, 2018 to May 31, 2019. The Garbage Hauler License Applicants in Exhibit A have submitted all of the requested documents and have met all requirements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Garbage Hauler licenses listed in Exhibit A for the license period of June 11, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Exhibits Exhibit A. Listing of Garbage Hauler Licenses Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: JS)�W Exhibit A City Council 2018 Garbage Hauler Licenses License# Business Name Total License Fees GH18- 000010 Empty Can Sanitation 90 GH18- 000005 Randy's Sanitation, Inc. 390 HH18- 000009 Blackowiak Disposal Inc. 120 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 5 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Appointment of 2018 Election Judges — Resolution Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. State Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that election judges for precincts in a municipality must be appointed by the governing body of the municipality at least 25 days before an election. 2. Staff Recommendation. It is staff's recommendation that Council adopt the attached resolution listing the names of the qualified persons who have indicated their willingness to serve as election judges at the Primary Election on August 14, 2018, and the General Election on November 6, 2018, with the understanding that amendments may be necessary to the appointments in order to fill vacancies and meet party splits. In addition, the appointed Election Judges shall be paid $10.00 per hour and Head Judges shall be paid $10.50 per hour, to carry out their duties at the polling place and to attend required training. In addition, Head Judges shall be compensated for mileage to pick up election supplies or deliver election returns at a rated allowed by the IRS (currently $.56 per mile) per State Statue 20413.31 and reimbursed $10.00 for the use of their cell phone on Election Day. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to adopt the attached resolution appointing Election Judges for the August 14, 2018 Primary Election and the General Election on November 6, 2018; the appointed Election Judges shall be paid $10.00 per hour, and Head Judges shall be paid $10.50 per hour. In addition, Head Judges shall be compensated for mileage to pick up election supplies or to deliver election returns at a rate allowed by the IRS (currently $.54 per mile) and reimbursed $10.00 for the use of their cell phone on Election Day. Exhibits Exhibit A. Resolution Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -1V CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE 2018 PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS TO BE HELD AUGUST 14, 2018 AND NOVEMBER 6, 2018 BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws 204B.21, Subd.2, the following persons are appointed as election judges for the Primary Election to be held on August 14, 2018 and the General Election to be held on November 6, 2018. John G. Bendt Mary Ellen Bennett Nancy M. Brantingham William Bull Barbara Burwell Thomas Cady Judy Carlson Nancy Danielson Laureen Darling Mary Lou Doherty Cheryl Goulet Doshan Darlene Durkin Nancy Edwards Leanna Erickson Eleanor Ferril Lindsay Freeman Leonard Freeman Linda Kelley Freivalds Ruth Garlock Marilyn Kay Gehrman Deborah Lumendal Karlton Gempler Maryann Merideth Inez Gratz Allan Nettles Norma Greene Anne Nettles Pam Gregory Janet Obrigewitsch Joy Grundeen Dave Peterson Kevin Gwash John Roberts Mona Harmann Jennifer Robertson Ann Hommeyer Holly Rocca Charles Hommeyer Ronald Rocca Bonnie Kaster Judy Rogosheske Sandra Keegan Penny Saiki Bruce Kelley Daryl Patricia Seifert Donald Kielley Suellen Tritz Kevin Landgraver Whitney Tucker Faith Larsen Janette Weaver Sandie Larson Patricia Welty Paula Lindberg Sherry White Sandra Lindgren Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on June 11, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Appointment of 2018 Seasonal Employees V6 Presenter: Jason Goehring Agenda Public Works Director/ Parks and Golf Course Supervisor Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain Council approval of seasonal employees. 2. Background. The hourly pay is proposed to be $10.00-12.00 for the Golf Course Clubhouse Attendants; $10-$15 for Parks and Golf Course Maintenance Employees, and $10-15 for Utilities Maintenance Workers; $12.00-$15.00 for the Brush Site Attendants; and a pay range of $15.00-$20.00 for the Assistant Superintendent and Clubhouse Manager. The Clubhouse Manager will be enrolled in the coordinated PERA plan. All other seasonal employees will fall under the 6 month PERA Classification and are therefore excluded from PERA membership. 3. Seasonal Employee Appointments and Candidates. 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: JG Reviewed By: Approved By: -1)a Name Position Wage Remarks ($/hr) 00 Robert Howells G.C. Clubhouse Manager $19.00 Returnee o ew Paul Tolzmann G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $12.00 Returnee Rebecca Anderson Utilities Maintenance Worker $12.00 Returnee d w N Calvin Schmidt Parks and Golf Maintenance $11.00 Returnee Marshall Hambro G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $12.00 Returnee Diana Otrey G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $11.00 Returnee William Fischer G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 Returnee James Berg G.0 Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 New Marie Jorland G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 New dCody Dickhausen Parks and Golf Maintenance $10.00 New Ronald Steffenhagen Parks and Golf Maintenance $10.00 New Ed Kvam Parks and Golf Maintenance $11.00 Returnee Approved Danielle Middendorf G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 New April 23, 2018 Approved Tami Campbell G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 New May 14, 2018 Approved Stuart Mayer Brush Site Attendant $12.00 New May 29, Scott Prochow G.C. Clubhouse Attendant $10.00 New 2018 Requesting Matt Urness Parks and Golf Maintenance $12.00 New Approval Nicholas Overturf Parks and Golf Maintenance $12.00 New 4. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval to hire of the seasonal employees in Table 3. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve hiring the seasonal employee as in the list above. Prepared By: JG Reviewed By: Approved By: -1)a AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Approval of Promotion of Sergeant Presenter: Correy Farniok, Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Police Chief Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to promote a Sergeant to the open position. Background. -The Orono Police Department has completed an internal promotional process for an open Sergeant position. Five officers expressed interest and submitted applications and letters of interest for the open position. Multiple interviews were conducted with the five individuals. The promotional process will also include a psychological leadership assessment. A final interview with the top two candidates was completed with the City Administrator, Deputy Chief and Police Chief. All the information was reviewed and Officer Tim Sonnek was selected for the open Sergeant position. Tim Sonnek has been with the Orono Police Department since 2006. Sonnek has more than 12 years of experience as a police officer with the department. Sonnek has completed assignments as the Drug Task Force Investigator (DTF), as a field training officer (FTO) for new officers and two years as a School Resource Officer and D.A.R.E instructor. Staff Recommendation. I recommend that we approve Officers Sonnek's promotion to Sergeant. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Officer Sonnek to Sergeant effective June 18, 2018 at the starting pay for Sergeant at $40.66 per hour. Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: jl 6a Approved By: -Tga AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Approval of Right of Way Summary Ordinance for Publication Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E. Agenda Consent Agenda Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval of the Summary Ordinance for Ordinance No. 207 - An Ordinance Repealing and Replacing in its Entirety City Code Title III, Chapter 18, Article IV Regarding Right -Of -Way Management for publication. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Summary Ordinance to Ordinance No. 207 - An Ordinance Repealing and Replacing in its Entirety City Code Title III, Chapter 18, Article IV Regarding Right -Of -Way Management. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Summary ROW ordinance. Prepared By: Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -19a CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING IN ITS ENTIRETY CITY CODE TITLE III, CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE IV REGARDING RIGHT-OF-WAY MANAGEMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on May 29, 2018, Ordinance No. 207, Third Series was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 207, Third Series the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication and approved by the City Council as authorized by state law. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, Ordinance No. 207, Third Series repeals and replaces in its entirety City Code Title III, Chapter 18, Article IV regarding right-of- way management to provide for permitting of excavations and obstructions in the right of way. Article IV also implements new legislation (Chapter 94) passed by the 2017 Minnesota legislature that authorizes the location of small cell wireless facilities within public rights-of-way, prescribes and limits local authority, establishes review timelines and permitting requirements, establishes maximum review charges and annual fees, etc. A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours or on the City's website. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 11 t" day of June, 2018. CITY OF ORONO LM ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 9 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-38, James and Mary Jundt, 1400 Brackets Point Road, Final Plat and Development Agreement Approval — Resolution Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Consent Agenda Development Director Section: 1. Purpose. This item is to consider the Final Plat of Southways, a four lot subdivision of 1400 Bracketts Point. 2. 15.99 Deadline. Application was received on April 03, 2018. The application was considered complete on April 24t''. Action must be taken by June 23, 2018. 3. Background/ Summary. The City Council adopted resolution 6835, on February 26, 2018, approving the preliminary plat for Southways, a 5 lot single family residential subdivision. Also on that date resolution 6836 approved the street vacation of a portion of Bracketts Point Road. The proposed final plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat, with the exception being the preliminary plat suggested five lots, and the final plat proposes four. All lots meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance in terms of lot width and size. The proposed use of the property, single family residential at density of .5 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A Development Agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney, and has been signed by the applicant, in anticipation of Council Approval. All costs associated with the development, including street/ utility abandonment and construction, storm water management, erosion control, etc., are the responsibility of the developer. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat and authorization of the Developers Agreement as proposed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Staff Recommendation: Motion to amend or adopt the attached resolution. Authorize Mayors signature of Development Agreement and Mylars. Exhibits Exhibit A. Final Plat Resolution - Draft Exhibit B. Final Plat Drawings Exhibit C. Development Agreement Exhibit D. Resolution 6835 Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF SOUTHWAYS - FILE #18-3998/LA18-000038 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, property owners James R. Jundt and Mary J. Jundt (hereinafter the "Owners") submitted an application for approval of a Preliminary Plat for property located at 1400 Bracketts Point Road in the City of Orono and legally described in Exhibit A (attached); and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on February 26, 2018 the Orono City Council granted approval for the Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 6835; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2018 the Developer made formal application for final plat approval for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 6835 and has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements and conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 6835. 2. Dedication on the plat of perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements as required in Resolution No. 6835. 3. Submittal of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits approving the grading, stormwater management facilities, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control plan. 4. Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. 5. Execution of a Development Contract including provision of financial security including a Page 1 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Letter of Credit and escrow to ensure that all site improvements are installed and maintained to the City's specifications and satisfaction, and to establish conditions for future development of the site. 6. Payment of development fees as follows: a. Park Dedication Fee: $16,650.00* b. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $24,180.00* d. Final Plat Application Fee: $500.00 *These fees are based on a 4 lot subdivision; the fees identified in Resolution 6835 were based on a five lot subdivision. WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this subdivision and hereby specify approval of each plan and identify them as part of the official record for SOUT14WAYS: Plat of SOUTHWAYS Sheet 1: Title Sheet (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 2: Demolition Plan (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 3: Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 4: Road Plan & Profile, Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profile (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 5: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 6: Detail Sheet (dated 4-16-18) Sheet 7: Detail Sheet (dated 4-16-18) All of the above noted plans are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and subject to any additional requirements and conditions specified by the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 6835, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of SOUTHWAYS, Hennepin County, Minnesota (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B) subject to the following conditions: 1. Development within SOUTHWAYS is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 6835, and subject to the provisions of the Development Contract for SOUTHWAYS dated May 29, 2018. 2. The City Council hereby approves the vacation of Bracketts Point Road as specified within Resolution No. 6836. Page 2 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The portion of Bracketts Point Road as dedicated in the plat of SOUTHWAYS, are hereby declared open as public roadways and upon satisfactory completion of public road improvements by the Developer shall be owned and maintained by the City, along with the sewer main line facilities within said roadways. 4. Upon completion by the Developer of the public utility improvements within the right-of- way of Bracketts Point Road platted within SOUTHWAYS, subject to final certification by the City Engineer that the work is satisfactory, the City will formally accept the utilities as public, and the City will maintain said facilities henceforth. 5. The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. 6. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 7. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County on or before November 29, 2019 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the conditions of this Resolution have not been met or the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 1 lth day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dermis Walsh, Mayor Page 3 of 4 Lots 5 and 6, Rearrangement of Orono Point; CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Exhibit A Also, that part of Lots 9 and 10, Rearrangement of Orono Point and the accretions thereto lying Southerly and Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Center Avenue 588.95 feet northerly from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 5, Rearrangement of Orono Point; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet, thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 107.3 feet; thence westerly making an angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes to the right a distance of 79.3 feet to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and there terminating; subject to Boarder Avenue as opened by Document No. 2092886, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Center Avenue as said Center Avenue was dedicated to the public in the plat of Rearrangement of Orono Point, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 4, said Rearrangement of Orono Point and northerly of a line drawn westerly perpendicular to the west line of said Lot 4 from a point on said west line distant 182.29 feet northerly from the southwest corner of said Lot 4; also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying southerly of said above described perpendicular line; and also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying northerly ofthe westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 4 and lying southerly of a line drawn easterly at right angles to the westerly line of said vacated Center Avenue from the point of intersection of said westerly line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following described line; Commencing at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly from the northwesterly corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Boarder Avenue as laid out and dedicated over and across part of Lot 9 in said Rearrangement of Orono Point which lies between the westerly line of said Center Avenue and a line drawn across said Border Avenue at right angles to the side lines of said Border Avenue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border Avenue with a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the centerline of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 56 feet a distance of 19.7 feet; thence southerly tangent to last said curve a distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7 feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5 feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Page 4 of 4 SOUTHWAYS Know all persons by these presents that James R. Jundt and Mary Joann Jundt, husband and wife, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lots 5 and 6, REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT; Also, that part of Lots 9 and 10, REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT and the accretions thereto lying Southerly and Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Center Avenue 588.95 feet northerly from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 5, REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 107.3 feet; thence westerly making an angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes to the right a distance of 79.3 feet to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and there terminating. Also, that part of vacated Center Avenue as said Center Avenue was dedicated to the public in the plat of REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 4, said REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT and northerly of a line drawn westerly perpendicular to the west line of said Lot 4 from a point on said west line distant 182.29 feet northerly from the southwest corner of said Lot 4; also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying southerly of said above described perpendicular line; and also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying northerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 4 and lying southerly of a line drawn easterly at right angles to the westerly line of said vacated Center Avenue from the point of intersection of said westerly line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly from the northwesterly corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet, and said line there ending. Also that part of vacated Border Avenue as laid out and dedictated over and across part of Lot 9 in said REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT which lies between the westerly line of said Center Avenue and a line drawn across said Border Avenue at right angles to the side lines of said Border Avenue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border Avenue with a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the centerline of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 56 feet a distance of 19.7 feet; thence southerly tangent to last said curve a distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7 feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5 feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending. Also, that part of vacated Border Avenue (now known as Bracketts Point Road) as dedicated to the public in the plat of REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT, described as follows: That part of Border Avenue (now known as Bracketts Point Road) as dedicated to the public in the plat of REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT which lies southerly of a line drawn across said Border Avenue at right angles to the side lines of said Border Avenue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border Avenue with the last described point in a line discribed as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Center Avenue in said plat distant 588.95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of Lot 5 in said plat; thence southerly along the centerline of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 56 feet a distance of 19.7 feet; thence southerly tangent to last said curve a distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7 feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5 feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending. And which lies northerly of the South line of Lot 6 in said plat. Has caused the same to be survey and platted as SOUTHWAYS, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways, the drainage and utility easements and the drainage easements as shown on this plat. GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. In witness whereof said James R. Jundt, married to Mary Joann Jundt, has hereunto set his hand this day of , 20 JAMES R. JUNDT STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) The forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by James R. Jundt, married to Mary Joann Jundt. Notary Public, County Notarys printed name My commision expires In witness whereof said Mary Joann Jundt, married to James R. Jundt, has hereunto set her hand this day of , 20 1VIFT111-1yo,161.1110 10 M111,211111 STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) The forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Mary Joann Jundt, married to James R. Jundt. Notary Public, County My commision expires Notarys printed name I Mark S. Gronberg do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 505.01, Subd. 3 as of the date of this certificate are shown and labled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Signed this day of , 20 Mark S. Gronberg Licensed Land Surveyor and Engineer Minnesota License number 12755 STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Mark S. Gronberg Land Surveyor and Engineer. Notary Public, County My commision expires ORONO, MINNESOTA Notarys printed name This plat of SOUTHWAYS was approved and accepted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held this day of , 20 . If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the city, or the presciribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statues, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Mayor , Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 MARK V. CHAPIN, COUNTY AUDITOR By , Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565, (1969), this plat has been approved this day of 20 CHRIS F. MAVIS, COUNTY SURVEYOR By COUNTY RECORDER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the with plat of SOUTHWAYS was recorded in this office this '20 at o'clock M. MARTIN MCCORMICK, COUNTY RECORDER By , Deputy ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS day of SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS SOUTHWAYS \\ FOUND•• ••*•• • 1/2" IP EON SNOREL\(% N ice/ � •• ' k6 `"\ '•, 35, � 47 6 SE'LY LINE OF LOT 6, REARRANGEMENT _.... �- �►� \ 4 OF ORONO POINT \\ \\ \ N 04°06'33" W 150.66 ` FOUND \ \ �\ \ ^ \ N •'. 1/2" IP LIN 11 o ti�8° •• �:r:• �. 7502 00ry�•',•.•.. r• \// \ \ / o °2542" ;93.75 �914(`\ \SNA \ _ __-___------- _------// �oO0. Bp 61 8380 s �\ 07 ham: h 00 =19. R=270.00 6.50.00 �4jo N `•-• . ... p�36°19'35" L020 A=13°51'04" N 2g 50:00--- 16A b,90 \ / s30pA L=65.27 S 03°58'01" W 2$ R=320.004k( 1A.D e L=158.50 A=14°50'59" A5� 41 O� o 19'35 L=82.94 g C=91. lb ps36° C 13RG.=S 1g --- _ ---- -- __-------'�\' A=132°0942 4,24°314304" N 'LY CORNER OF LOT 5, / 5 // c' P \ REARR. OF ORONO POINT 4 FOUND goo 1/2" IP CORNER \ / 29 �,�� N62 NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 4, 1_OT 4�5 / / :- X524° 22- of 2} / / /✓ S /� 5 / REARR. OF LINE POINT ti) WEST SINE OF =..� \ —_�/� 5��/i: /���,� yosi s3 _ / oo / yy --/ � \ BOA OF LQT 4 --�� // FZ 2183025 \ X62 // \\ \ // /y�h� Otis !,� // �\ \ 2p �` 182• No g1.08 �,$0 (5 \ /// \ \ s Com/ j X1 // `j�C' WESTERLY EXTENSION OF \ 06 ROARR OFLINEOFLOT 4, \ 71 "5 "� 11°19'16„ W 183.2 0 \ o 1S3 i// \\ \ 07 ORONO POINT'.. 3 \f '16" W 140 N POINT 588.95 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE �5°53� 11°19 NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 5, CENTERLINE 2p.04" W \ N o 0g28$6 �-" �� \ / (A 2':: 95 OC N0.2 _-".- \D REEARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT 588 o pERD TT 5.32 OF BORDER AVENUE 4 N 11°1916&C Cz 0 147101, 21.97 O 11°1916°W _(� \" �_�--"� W 50493 201.61 \ \\ \\c'`v / \�% / p �Z���\ NII N 11°19'16 ! _-- ' \ \ \ \ Q // J �/ N �`� l' J— \ o2 \ \ o^� 459.6� \ CAD r444'r5•. \ —� �/o o \ , \ \ \\ / �CJ� �;��x ���Drainage and utility easements shown thus: s s R=221.17 s Oo ,8=43'52'45,, g°3845 C4. � 8 1 l9, \'z) �J_ II5 5I=04°34'58" 1 S9\\\ 7.70 �\ \ /ii 01 *41 Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and Mc, 9�Al 2� (\ \ ' \ EPSP DOC A \��•' adjoining right of waydunes being less otherws10 feet in te indicated 00� s� \ \ \ BRPCTEO BY D v_• //. z 1 9 9 L%/// on the plat. VACATED BORDER AVE \ \ \ \ \ \. 3• FOUND HENN. CO. CIM AT o'A PER DOC. NO. ^ \ a \ ' o b'� � � � '• \ / �//X30 MC ON EAST LINE OF `�\ \ \ � SEC. 10-117-23 1/22" IP D \\ Q \\ \ \ L \ �`� 9L �\ ,�/'s ��' \ \ //1�� • DENOTES FOUND IRON MARKER AS NOTED \ �J �° VNvgCO o :DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH SET IRON MONUMENT a ,5600 3 g2'' S \ ' \ // �s, �1`ti MARKED BY MN, LIC. NO. 12755 20° o, - \ _ G, 0 \ E w /' FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY, THE SOUTHEASTERLY \�p� \ 19 "09 951"�� X68 30.42 S °50'15" / c9\ r o'er \ 4" E 148. S 06°35' 11 / o \ \��-- -- — �- HIGHEST KNOWN LAKE ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS LINE OF LOT 6, REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT HAS \c�'O N \—A510°260 13' W / �` -./� .,_ 931.11 FT., NGVD-1929 ON 6-23-14, ACCORDING TO THF_ MINNESOTA AN ASSUMED BEARING OF S 62°17'44" W --r� \ \ \ \�%�lil1 .L / / DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOUND — 1/2' IP Z\` -'— -- 2" WATER ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS 928.58 FT., NGVD-1929 00 4 169 \\ �� �— �. ��.I�SURVEY LINE \ ' �— 172.53 --- —.'� ON NOVEMBER 13, 2017 0 L 326.05-- -- \ BENCHMARK IS A BRASS DISC SURVEY MONUMENT IN GROUND 15 FEET WEST OF SWALE RIPRAP, 25 FEET NORTH OF CONCRETE CURB AT EXIT OF GRAYS rn 10 S 04°21'06" E 498.58 \ \ BAY AREA, ELEVATION=932.7FT., NGVD-1929 R=78.10 110+_ S 09°22'15" W 0_37°19 27" SHORELINE ON 3-20-18 L_51 GRONBERG &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS SCALE IN FEET )0 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS r-- SHEET2.SCJ 17-350 _ o T3 U O N N O �,. d Ts '4� N U O o° w � o -d �. o o ol ooo E" Uowopo.-0c- g4 -s o0 5 o 0 03 o v 0 o C '5 0 t> "z O " '2 - Er ' O gooo�'>o' ° OE 0. 04 10, lz,s ° � u -t4 -010 aim ¢-� o104 0 ° o 0 O y0 c N O 'yC z 'O :3 >, a> -o O N of Q a> iso. o:�v •>, 3�03o.8 O M +' io. Elvy "G cyK Q' _3 N x•o0 .C23:= >t49 r.00'an .� o 00 > aoi N ami c I~ o W C j �o a>v 0w o00 -o or. '0 chi. v i� o ��ov �a�o•�00'o o 0 '«O3! OU N Mit +0' V d•• 00 GJi m �m >OW v FO NN 4•�t +4 'i ,55 +6rv O �f-•+�. � 'aO�-• Cd �' •� .v- Ocd O o P o �iEl3 a a� o > a A U aki W • • • • • • p =(D W d• .. O O •O • U W. a--0 U Q O .(D 'a O N = E CL WW ao��o°> at Dane o 0 0I> c: aLd`>i6 ,2 ca s Z ii r- N d v> m O a N Q °' �j Z3 t= �� s o _ WU `"aiMos�c w� o a> r- C e w C i 0 S3 N a i 0 .. O U N C?ZWZ E'0 '3 M N opo Nm r- a ca w . n V O. [2 Z {► O N N> O > N d C C Z Q 3�0 E. 2 (D Ea �� t4 cy Q m cll c s s c> o zs .n I0QU co cam. yE Q'Fxc--x(1-0 • o ' cCLI Q =Z CL �� M >04)-0otc —a-. W�>-0—m3EECL M aam S .J I.f. L N c°a oo O a N U3 V N 0 Em _r:_ iZ 7 i-' mom'' coa c'a r>'n o��4) voiM -C - c E Vi a�>E oc m c-OitM�o -O J W u> c `�° W fU E N 0 a`> V of C w 'C• Z Z � ^� �, 3 a> (1) 0) C6 � m c o -5- x CL. - 0 - S Q 4 C N w C w j Y Q O �O > is o N z U. s ca — N L a t6 _� 2 110 CO ckfo W \ o� �'� \ \ \ / (o' w `� \ c� �� \ \ \ ( V) \O w Y \ " \ \ \ wLLJ 0 w o m Z Q O to \ \ 0 3 m o W - / Z 1 \ \ 431 0 m0 I to O ^ NN U� / Z rW Q^ Q CL \ \ CoQ /�.. \PIZ cn\ Y J ' 1'� d' \ \ \ I \ r,. <.-. J •,. H o Q .;•. U �� of ( J a> tY ai �o o = . oo o� wOS ¢E �a - _ �W v / ¢ \ JO C mU CO O a 0 e- y��'/•;\ U _ZOAF,mE w Q UJ �_ .•W `o m >> Z° ac c o xa W <W L 0 o-iaa0:0 McLliz wo0i6x cn tl- dry \os __f / °' m 3 N Z \ \ �� 6\ /i / / Q \ — — — ' O Y3 M \ \ \ LLI Q \ \ o M O \ Uw \ \ — — — / / Lu MwZ_ `Mm, p>�` am / Dc v cs v 3 Q W ' �, jP O \ \ \ m / 'D 0/ `\ -- — — — \ / / M M 52 N�/ 0 NP M M }� fO oN� cn m . \\� SC \ / / \\\� \\\ �fac// ° / �6/ �P��SE�/ // J x2> \ \ -- ~ oma, N? ��? / • \ \ z / _I:3 2000 ..� _ / • •`"� / \\ \ a� M 2APsr LO \ / ��\ �a Z LLJ (n a Z \\ \\aD 04 \\ \ \\ \ \ _ / �CL a o �o o \ \ W \ \ .RLu zo of l0 P O \ \ 00 \� \ / 10 a cn o> LLI KPPYER �m N ON W \ \ J` \ \ \ \ \ // �z P Imo, 0 E \ \ \ AM (COD 04 • ----- N o-934-- to 934_- Clio ' -- i -C R! RXP 930— \ \ _ — 932/ =g> : — / / - --- ------ 12.? -930'/ / LO 6-2 N i� Z a w ° `—' z � LO � Q U O4- N •- O Z U� a `O WAz U E J It w- �-0 O O °�vi0 a w Y cn H � t/j a Q o z Z t. a +� O E 3 a v L o Utz—U 0 I CL - A � ------- 46 L 0 o c a O J P4 w z z 7- wz� M W P" O z -�._ �•"�. --�- � - -940- / � = � � ��,cn'„i — —ZS6 � \ —. i•. f�t9 / \ 110 CO ckfo W \ o� �'� \ \ \ / (o' w `� \ c� �� \ \ \ ( V) \O w Y \ " \ \ \ wLLJ 0 w o m Z Q O to \ \ 0 3 m o W - / Z 1 \ \ 431 0 m0 I to O ^ NN U� / Z rW Q^ Q CL \ \ CoQ /�.. \PIZ cn\ Y J ' 1'� d' \ \ \ I \ r,. <.-. J •,. H o Q .;•. U �� of ( J a> tY ai �o o = . oo o� wOS ¢E �a - _ �W v / ¢ \ JO C mU CO O a 0 e- y��'/•;\ U _ZOAF,mE w Q UJ �_ .•W `o m >> Z° ac c o xa W <W L 0 o-iaa0:0 McLliz wo0i6x cn tl- dry \os __f / °' m 3 N Z \ \ �� 6\ /i / / Q \ — — — ' O Y3 M \ \ \ LLI Q \ \ o M O \ Uw \ \ — — — / / Lu MwZ_ `Mm, p>�` am / Dc v cs v 3 Q W ' �, jP O \ \ \ m / 'D 0/ `\ -- — — — \ / / M M 52 N�/ 0 NP M M }� fO oN� cn m . \\� SC \ / / \\\� \\\ �fac// ° / �6/ �P��SE�/ // J x2> \ \ -- ~ oma, N? ��? / • \ \ z / _I:3 2000 ..� _ / • •`"� / \\ \ a� M 2APsr LO \ / ��\ �a Z LLJ (n a Z \\ \\aD 04 \\ \ \\ \ \ _ / �CL a o �o o \ \ W \ \ .RLu zo of l0 P O \ \ 00 \� \ / 10 a cn o> LLI KPPYER �m N ON W \ \ J` \ \ \ \ \ // �z P Imo, 0 E \ \ \ AM (COD 04 • ----- N o-934-- to 934_- Clio ' -- i -C R! RXP 930— \ \ _ — 932/ =g> : — / / - --- ------ 12.? -930'/ / 00 w I w0I Lf) �gtto o� y oM O LO 6-2 N i� Z a w ° `—' z � LO � Q U O4- N •- O Z U� a `O WAz U E J It w- �-0 O O °�vi0 a w Y cn H � t/j a Q o z Z t. a +� O E 3 a v L o Utz—U 0 I CL - A � N 46 L 0 o c a O J P4 w z z 7- wz� M W P" O z z W Ln 0 It �1 00 w I w0I Lf) �gtto o� y oM O LO 6-2 N i� i.� � C- N ° ° w a� O�a � Q U O4- N •- O Z tz c a� T o U E J It w- �-0 O O °�vi0 p a:3 0 cn L-UU) O J a� C C �s+ 41 -c E-83 41 4- N +� O E 3 a v L o Utz—U 0 � � CL - vi a� Qom, L 0 o c _ 3 T -ID" 5" +j F 5" N N to CATCH BASIN PLAN BASE SLAB PLAN MIN 3 NOTES: MAX 6 ADJUSTING RINGS _ _ _ 1. CASTING TO BE TYPE R -3067-V UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PLANS O 2.PIPE CUT-OUTS PER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS - A CAST -IN-PLACE e N E USED fi 3. ALTERNATE CAST IN PLACE ASE CA 8 i 0 4. MIN REINFORCING SHALL BE WIRE FABRIC HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.12 SQ IN PER FOOT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS 5. BRING TRACER WIRE INTO CATCH BASIN BELOW FIRST GROUT INVERT ADJUSTING RING, PROVIDE 3' MIN COIL OF SECTION TRACER WIRE WITHIN THE CATCH BASIN 6. TRACER WIRE TO BE USED WHEN NON-CONDUCTIVE PIPE IS INSTALLED CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE DESIGN R -1 (2'X3') WITH TRACER WIRE NOT TO SCALE C:A1 hl LiAJIN DETAIL LOG �■ i/iUPtr STRLI,LXRESLGN gOLTOl.. ® R-1 2' 3 WITH REVISIONS: DATE: TR CER IRE +_ & MENK ORONO PLATE NO: t c7Y STO-106 Real People. Real Solutions. BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL w ac N FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (31491) 6" PE PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN WITH FILTER CLOTH N SUBSURFACE PIPE DRAIN GRADE NOT TO SCALE Q�fi SUBSURFACE PIPE DETAIL LOG//J�\��jV � g�ItLToN DRAIN REVISIONS: DATE: &MENK ,-IIe�R s� ORONO PLATE0: p STO-300-300 Real People. Real Solutions. PROVIDE 6-1/2" SS ANCHOR BOLTS W/CLIPS 1(/2'X3/8" OUTER RING 1112"X3/8" STEEL BARS ® 4' O.C. MH DIAMETER SKIMMER OPENING �•"- 3'X1. �PRCri m i/4" PLATE WITH LOCKING CLASP CUSP TO HAVE 1/2' PADLOCK HOLE 1/4"X1/4' STEEL. BAR, WELD 'M EACH MEMBE II NOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED GRATE IN 1 SECTIONS GRATE PROVIDE J./1" DIA. CONTINUOUS HINGE BAR ELEV.=XXX.X 9-4202 (i HVVL NWL %?/. S L /s' tuv.mxxp-x .. RCP / $ .i l�l�Ait 6' MIN. 1RJrAA r#VAr.#,g# L = 2'� � 929• o � � *A0,ffl .1A 0.0 8" MIN, SLAB 928.5 6" ---------• - T THICKNESS -6' AIGGR8G11TTe BACKFILL DIA. VMM RINGS OF RA M-NEK TO (MNDOT SPEC. 3149H MOD.) MANHOLE BE PLAN BETWEEN � BARREL SECTION AND BOTTOM SLAB /O O • ALJG 2006 ' STANDARD SKIMMER STRUCTURE SOUTH POND'` SHEET7.SCJ 17-350 STANDARD DETAIL SHEE11 SEE CITY PLATE NO, STO-7 FOR RIPRAP PLACEMENT. ISOMETRIC L-TIELAST 3 PIPE JOINTS. USE 2 TIE BOLT FASTENERS PER JOINT. INSTALL AT 60" FROM TOP OR BOTTOM OF PIPE. PROVIDE 3 ANCHOR CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUARD TO FLARED END SECTION. HOT DIP GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. TRASH GUARD SIZING PIPE SIZE BARS 'H' BOLTS 17' 3/4"0 2 1/2" 518" 15" 3/4"0 3" 5/B" 18" 314"0 4" 5/8" 21"-24" 11.0 4" 314" 27"-36" 1"0 5" 3/4" 42" 1.0 6" 3/4" 48"-54" 11/4"06' 1„ 60"-72" 1114"07" 1 78"-90" 1 1/4"0 8" V (} FLARED ENO SECTION AND TRASH GUARD DETAIL LG O BOLTON S & M E N K REVISIONS: DATE: 15' 15• ORONO PLATE NO: a -w 12' :r j1tFSMt3N�'.•. STO-600 0000 Real People, Real Solutions. 4U---'vMCO 0 ai U c N >,0 MH DIAMETER SKIMMER . ON91M 3*45 5' 5'X1.5 ' 6xl.s ' PROVIDE 1/4' PLATE WITH LOWNG CLASP CLASP TO HAVE 1/2' PADLOCK HOLE 1/4"X1/4' STEEL BAR, WELD TO EACH MEMBER HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZE GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS GRATE DETAIL ' PROVIDE Vr DIA. CONTINUOUS HV%rAE BAR ELEV.-)O"^1713.2 1 10- _F /*V 09 2. S'W,, 445 x 1. %'NJC,y tsa6rt. •_ HOLE F W DIA. RCP ti L +� . CA - - - 6' MIN' gj A fr, I FIeeQ .) .1 8" MIN. SLAB 6" THICKNESS V AGGREGATE BACKFILL VARIES 2 RINGS OF RAM -NBC TO (MNDOT SPEC. 3149H MOD.) MANHOLE BE PLACED BETWEEN BARREL SECTION AND BOTTOM sub LAST RL!V0m. 0 O ; AUG 2006 i STANDARD SKIMMER STRUCTURE ' NORTH POND RAIN GARDEN PLANT LIST: THE FOLLOWING RAIN GARDEN MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 10 UWAC (1 LB/4,400 SO TO EACH RAIN GARDEN UP TO THE PROPOSED HIGH WATER ELEVATION: 2OX WILDFLOWERS THAT INCLUDES: W% PRAIRIE GRASS AND SEDGE THAT INCLUDES; ALLUM CERNUUM NODDING PINK ONION ANDROPOGON GERARD I BIG BLUESTEM ASCLEPIAS INCARNATA SWAMP MILKWEED ANDROPOGON:SCOPARIUS LITTLE BLUESTEM" ASCLEPIASTUREROSA BUTTERFLY MILKWEEDCAREXVULPINOIDEA FOX SEDGE ASTER LAEVIS SMOOTH BLUE ASTER ELYMUS VIRGINICUS VIRGINIA WILD RYE j ASTER NDVAE-ANGUAE NEW ENGLAND ASTER HYSTRIX PATULA BOTTLE BRUSH GRASS ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER• PANICUM VIRGATUM SWITCH GRASS EUPATORIUM MACULATUM JOE PVF WEED' SORGHASTRUM NUTANS INDIAN GRASS HFLIANT USHEUANTHOIDES FALSE SUNFLOWERER uATalSPvrnosrACHYa THICK SPIKED 8LaaNGSTAR LIATRIS SPICATA DENSE SLAZINGSTAR LOSELIAUPHIUTICA GREAT BLUE LOBELIA MONARDA FISTULOSA WILD BERGAMOT RATISIDA PINNATA YELLOW CONEFLOWER " SALT TOLERANT PLANTS THESE PLANTS ARE TO RUDBECKIA HIRTA BLACK-EYED SUSAN' UTILIZED IN RAIN GARDENS TAKING RUNOFF FROM RUDSECIOA SUSTOMENTOSA SWEET BLACK-EYED SUSAN STREETIPARKING AREAS DIRECTLY VERBENA HASTATA BLUE VERVAIN °T CONTRACTOR WILL CHOOSE 5 WILDFLOWERS FROM THIS VERNONIA FASCICULATA COMMON IRONWEED MIX AS WELL AS 3 GRASSES VERONICASTRUM VIRGINICUM CULVER'S ROOT ZIZIAAUREA GOLDEN ALEXANDER' RAIN GARDEN NOTES: I- RAIN GARDEN AREA SHALL BE GRADED TO A DEPTH OF W-18"; SEE PLANS FOR ACTUAL GRADING DEPTHS; RAIN GARDEN AREA AWACENTTO WALL OR WALK SHALL HAVE 10" MIN FREEBOARD 2. CONTRACTORSHALL TO AVOID COMPACTING SOILS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN AREA, IF COMPACTION HAS OCCURRED CONTRACTOR SHALL RIP AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 18" AND TILL IN 6" OF ORGANIC COMPOST PRIOR TO ANY PLANTINGS 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN RAIN GARDEN AREA FREE FROM WEEDS AND OTHER INVASIVE PLANT MATERIAL 4. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT CONDITION OF RAIN GARDEN UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND GIVE WRITTEN PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE: FOLLOWING ANNIVERSARY DATE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT RAIN GARDEN AREA FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE; INSPECTION WILL INCLUDE OVERALL CONDITION OF PLANTINGS, INDICATION OF ANY WEEDS AND MONITORING OF ANY SEDIMENTATION; FINAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE OFFEREDTO CONTRACTOR AFTER ANY COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED UPON THIS INSPECTION S. AFTER FIRST GROWING SEASON, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL DEAD PLANT DEBRIS FROM PREVIOUS GROWING SEASON AND PRUNE SHRUB MATERIAL AS NECESSARY FOR OVERALL APPEARANCE OF RAIN GARDEN 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR AND CONTROL SEDIMENTATION IN SPREADER STRIP, PRETREATMENT AREAS (TURF) AND IN RAIN GARDEN FOR ONE FULL YEAR; TURF ON PRETREATMENT AREAS SHALL BE MOWED WITH LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT (TO AVOID SOIL COMPACTION) TO 34" HEIGHT 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR MOISTURE IN ALL RAIN GARDEN AREAS FOR ONE FULL YEAR; CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLEMENT WATER IF THERE IS INSUFFICIENT RAINFALL PER WEEK (ONE INCH PER WEEK) S. MULCH ISTO BE 4"-S" OF MNDOT TYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN RAIN GARDEN; CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN 4" CLEARING AROUND BASE OF SHRUBS AND 3"CLEARING AROUND PERENNIALS, FREE FROM MULCH; CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INITIAL DEPTH OF MULCH FOR ONE FULL YEAR IN RAIN GARDEN AREAS TO REDUCE WEED INFESTATION 9. RAIN GARDEN AREAS ARE. TO RECEIVE 4' DFPTH OF PLAITING SOIL; PLANTING SOIL IS TO CONSIST OF 20%ORGANIC MATERIAL, SM SANDY SOIL AND 30% TOPSOIL, CLAY CAN BE PRESENT TO A. MAXIMUM OF 10%, OF OVERALL MIX; ALL AMENDED NATIVE SOILS SHALL MEET XXL MIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS; CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE PERCOLATION RATE OF AMENDED SOIL GREATER THAN ONE INCH PER HOUR 10. SEE SPECIFICATION BOOKLET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RAIN GARDEN NOTES DETAIL LOG RAIN GARDEN BOLTON V DATE: NOTES REVISIONS: S & MENK ORONO PLATE NO: aFP STO-701 Real People. Real Solutions, FINISHED GRADE 0 DITCH OR SWALE �( O O O O o,\\�!� O O O O O � _ 0000�0�0�0� VARIES FROM 1.0' TO 2.5' m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COURSEOT 2 AGGREGATE 0 0 0 0 0000 i 3000 O O O n O " 6CORRUGATED �L ED POLYETHLENE �-- _�,j DRAINAGE TUBING W. SOCK 8.0' "1 (MNDOT SPEC. 3278) DAYLIGHT AT ENDS OF TRENCHE FILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL PL CL PL 2Y 25' 14' TO FACE 14' TO FACE SURMOUNTABLE OR 8612 CONM I E CURB 3% MIN. 4�:CROWN 1/4' / FOOT NOTE :1.5" TYPE 9.5 WEARING COURSE (3,B) (SPWEA340B) (2360) ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER -- -------------- __ - - UNSWABLE MATERIAL SHALL 2" TYPE 12.S NON COARSE (3,B) (SPNW8330B) (2360) BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CIL 5 (2211) 1 THE ROADWAY. EOTEXTILE'FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE S (3J33) SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 3-10 UNIT'S BITUMINOUS STREET WITH MUM CURB AND GUTTER 0 �. LAST REVISWN: ® o TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR >AN 2006 PUBLIC RESIDENTIAL STREETS URBAN SECTION PLATE No. SM -6 ATCH BASIN FRAME ADJUSTING RINGS AS PER SPECIFICATIONS DD EOPRENE RUBBER TOP SECTION 0Dt! - U�t/(///(fQ ROM RUBBER BOTTOM O M SECTt N (MIN. 60 MIL THICKNESS) S EXTERNAL SEALE SL EVE TO BE _ - _ INSTALLED PER R - --_ _ - MANUFACTURE S RECOMMENDATIONS ----CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE SANITARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLE FRAME 0 0'000 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTING RINGS AS PER 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 00000000"000000 SPECIFICATIONS = 000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OO O O O O O 0 0 0 -- NEOPRENE RUBBER O SECTION TOP I N 0000000 _ PDM RUBBER BOTTOM SECTION (MIN. 60 MIL THICKNESS) EXTERNAL SEAL. SLEEVE TO BE I-' INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS TOP SLAB OR CONE SECTION ANHOLE SECTION NOTE: 1. CATCH BASIN CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH NO. R-3067 OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR TYPE 11 AND NEENAH R-4342 FOR TYPE 1. 2. MANHOLE CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH NO 1642-8 OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH "STORM SEWER" STAMPED ON THE COVER. CATCH BASIN AND DETAIL LOG gp LTQ N MANHOLE EXTERNAL SEAL REVISIONS: DATE: 4 ORONO PLATE N0: MENK "<�tyll STO-705 Real People, Real Solutions. 3.5" BLACKTOP 8" GRAVEL COMPACTED SUBGRADE 0 O O O O GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 00000000000000 0000000000 zm 3 0 O 0 O O COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE ri 000000000-MNDOT (3149.2H) OOO000O OnO 6" CORRUGATED POLYETHLENE ��j DRAINAGE TUBING W. SOCK �- 8.0° "I (MNDOT SPEC. 3278) DAYLIGHT AT ENDS OF TRENCHES FILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL DRIVEWAY SECTION WITHOUT DITCH PL 25' CL 0-0 PL 25' CROWN CR 15' 15• a -w 12' NOTE: NO BLOCK OR OTHER FILLER ALLOWED #4 EACH FACE---__, BENTONITE OR MASTIC WATERSTOP ALL AROUND PIPE. CENTER IN WALL-- POURED IN PLACE 3Y43 CONCRETE SEEPAGE C NOTE: COLLAR MUST BE ADEQUATELY FRAMED USING WOOD OR OTHER ACCEPLABLE MATERIAL NOTE: SUBGRADE PREPARATION/EXCAVATION TO BE ACCORDING TO SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 244 BARS EACH FACE TYPICAL 4 SIDES. #4 DIAGONAL EACH FACE TYPICAL 4 SIDES. UNDISTURBED SOIL SECTION AA NOTE: NOTCH ALL SIDES INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL ',\ DETAIL LOG REVISIONS: gp LKTO N DATE: SEEPAGE COLLAR IONS: ` 5 & MENK ORONO PLATE NO: DSTO-706 Real People. Real Solutions. U m Z W4 W co '-' z LO n U1 04L0L Az E-4 '4r- � a Y F--�i a U a J 0:,: t. U)aI co LLJ od .4 a o J W Z z W 0 z W z z z W •Lo o a d 0t~ 04> V' Go i � 9 I- U LdD O n L 0 r 2' Min. MIN. I 0-0 CROWN CR 04 .- ° a -w 4•.1 A•,1 � 0000 4U---'vMCO 0 ai U c N >,0 4' DITCH BOTTOM E YS"TYPE 9.5 WEARING COURSE (3,B) (SPWEA3408) (2360) NOTE _0 0 2" TYPE 12.5 PION -WEARING COURSE (3,B) (SPNW83306) (2360) ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER O', ��aciv 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) 1 UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM c EOTEXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT TYPE 5 (3733) BENEATH THE ROADWAY. - � N �oE3 v c SUBGRAIDE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) 0 L to -v 3-6 UNITS oc VL_I41 BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER v 0-.4.. L vi acc 0 LAST REVISION: O O ` TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR )AN 2006 PUBLIC RESIDENTIAL STREETS URBAN SECTION �� No• NOTE: SUBGRADE PREPARATION/EXCAVATION TO BE ACCORDING TO SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 244 BARS EACH FACE TYPICAL 4 SIDES. #4 DIAGONAL EACH FACE TYPICAL 4 SIDES. UNDISTURBED SOIL SECTION AA NOTE: NOTCH ALL SIDES INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL ',\ DETAIL LOG REVISIONS: gp LKTO N DATE: SEEPAGE COLLAR IONS: ` 5 & MENK ORONO PLATE NO: DSTO-706 Real People. Real Solutions. U m Z W4 W co '-' z LO n U1 04L0L Az E-4 '4r- � a Y F--�i a U a J 0:,: t. U)aI co LLJ od .4 a o J W Z z W 0 z W z z z W •Lo o a d 0t~ 04> V' Go i � 9 I- U LdD O n L 0 Lo 0-0 c 04 .- ° a -w 0 °-w °c d � 0000 4U---'vMCO 0 ai U c N >,0 E U) CL _0 0 Q'', 0-0U)N O', ��aciv In O ._I N c v vv: E -a4 - � N �oE3 v c acv °p 0 L to -v L 0 oc VL_I41 v 0-.4.. L vi acc 0 _ 3 � :2 ALL 1001116TRUCTION & MATERIALS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST tic SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF ORONO, MNDOT & THE CITY ENGINEERS 7 a i ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM). SOUTHWAYS STANDARD DETAIL SHEET -„1 INV --935.5 AT Ft1 7 END t r Igo ; BOLLARD POST (TYP) \ j V r_ / 8” CONCRETE ! } { GENERATOR PAD GENERATOR t r I VALVE VAULT SEE SHEET I \ p 1I f t f SALVAGE 8 \ r�,r REINSTALL STONE f \ WALL AS REQUIRED I It INV=933.17 i 4*HDPE FM (BY OTHERS) 1 �1 I t- 1 4 r 1 V 1 !t r, II 11 11 11—�-11 I g ` 1 t 1f I I ! S" LIFT STATIONPAD CONTROL PANEL t� f(' SOUTHWAYS LPr T STATION 7 t� SEE SHEET XX VO jr�i t i y~ v If- / flt O i A A 1 ° it MH4 ( rfr V I 8'SAN toy v v � -'-"' j'_�f' / A o TTY OF ORONO MINNESOTA NOTES: ,aucmaanrvnaru,awa. svtaxwta,tnal•oarrvwsw■nwlo mn♦caunoEnprvoa suoFaunrwuurx.n utwaarua■sco ' ` " r• „re anasr n� BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CRASKA MINNESOTA 55318 ou"v. XXX C , SOUTHWAYS UFT STATION AND LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENTS EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT O 5 10 H ACCEPTABILITY LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. WHEN REMOVING OR ' \ male: I9s2144s-e83s BIT DRIVEWAY \ \\ 1 C3.01. SCALE FEET © FINISHED WE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED, SHALL EXTEND A ENGINEER'S NAME & M E NK En>eR: ChaskaQtwkon-menkcomXXX www.lwR-2' as-kuc a REMOVAL SITE PLAN ,k 0 INSTALLATION NOTES: r SECTION IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30", MEASURED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP Of THE GRATE. t I F-1 TRIM EXCESS FABRIC IN THE FLOW LINE TO WITHIN 3" OF THE GRATE. I V PROPOSED 15" RCP CULVERT i OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING O�,"� VV z AT A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG, � v utijTEXTILE BAG En NOT TO SCALE � t r� v r A ,t v C;8 :4 I Ir a O _I 4 -p (UN p I I ! S" LIFT STATIONPAD CONTROL PANEL t� f(' SOUTHWAYS LPr T STATION 7 t� SEE SHEET XX VO jr�i t i y~ v If- / flt O i A A 1 ° it MH4 ( rfr V I 8'SAN toy v v � -'-"' j'_�f' / A o TTY OF ORONO MINNESOTA CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 4"x4" TRENCH BACKFILLED OVER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 17-350 6"-7" DIA STRAW OR WOOD— FIBER ROLL ENCLOSED IN PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING DITCH CHECK - BIOROLL NOT TO SCALE FRZ,q F?sM ey4,M r N s POINT'A' 8", 11ga STAPLES SPACED V-0" ON CENTER --2"x2"x18" LONG WOOD STAKES AT 2'-0" SPACING DRIVE THROUGH NETTING AND FIBER ROLL NOTE: POINT'A' MUST BE 1'-0" MIN HIGHER THAN POINT'B' TO ENSURE THAT WATER FLOWS OVER THE DITCH CHECK AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS DETAIL LOG BO LTV N ORONO PLATE NO: DITCH CHECK REVISIONS: DATE: & MEN K ( ERO-002 - BIOROLL ' I w; Real People. Real Solutions. ikFt Htl� - INLET SPECIFICATIONS ASPER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH GEOTEXTILE• iva.N'y'siii' ♦♦♦� ♦♦♦i. •• TABLESPEC. 3886, ••• ■■■■■�. t►'•! ��♦jam �� M�1y urao■ I■aur 7 MACHINE SLICE • BE MADE FROM SINGLE__` �■■■: 78� ■ 4e♦moi PIECE OF nrn n •j♦i♦1`�' 4-A" OVAL 11 BE SIDE PANELS A� • I j FLAP NOTES: ,aucmaanrvnaru,awa. svtaxwta,tnal•oarrvwsw■nwlo mn♦caunoEnprvoa suoFaunrwuurx.n utwaarua■sco ' ` " r• „re anasr n� BOLTON 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 CRASKA MINNESOTA 55318 ou"v. XXX C , SOUTHWAYS UFT STATION AND LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENTS EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT O 5 10 H ACCEPTABILITY LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. WHEN REMOVING OR OR MAINTAINING INLET PROTECTION, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN SO THAT THE male: I9s2144s-e83s , CURB BOX USE WOOD C3.01. SCALE FEET © FINISHED WE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED, SHALL EXTEND A ENGINEER'S NAME & M E NK En>eR: ChaskaQtwkon-menkcomXXX www.lwR-2' as-kuc a REMOVAL SITE PLAN FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2.4, 0 INSTALLATION NOTES: t0001X MM/OD/Y1'YY SECTION IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30", MEASURED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP Of THE GRATE. PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 4"x4" TRENCH BACKFILLED OVER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 17-350 6"-7" DIA STRAW OR WOOD— FIBER ROLL ENCLOSED IN PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING DITCH CHECK - BIOROLL NOT TO SCALE FRZ,q F?sM ey4,M r N s POINT'A' 8", 11ga STAPLES SPACED V-0" ON CENTER --2"x2"x18" LONG WOOD STAKES AT 2'-0" SPACING DRIVE THROUGH NETTING AND FIBER ROLL NOTE: POINT'A' MUST BE 1'-0" MIN HIGHER THAN POINT'B' TO ENSURE THAT WATER FLOWS OVER THE DITCH CHECK AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS DETAIL LOG BO LTV N ORONO PLATE NO: DITCH CHECK REVISIONS: DATE: & MEN K ( ERO-002 - BIOROLL ' I w; Real People. Real Solutions. ikFt Htl� - INLET SPECIFICATIONS ASPER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH GEOTEXTILE• iva.N'y'siii' ♦♦♦� ♦♦♦i. •• TABLESPEC. 3886, ••• ■■■■■�. t►'•! ��♦jam �� M�1y urao■ I■aur 7 MACHINE SLICE • BE MADE FROM SINGLE__` �■■■: 78� ■ 4e♦moi PIECE OF nrn n •j♦i♦1`�' 4-A" OVAL 11 BE SIDE PANELS A� • I j FLAP DETAIL LOG BO LTO N 0 ORONO PLATE NO: INLET PROTECTION REVISIONS: DATE: J ERO-102 GEOTEXTILE BAG & M E N K'' Real People. Real Solutions. NOTE: OWNER WILL SUPPLY PUMPS, LIFTING CHAINS, GUIDE RAILS, BRACKETS, ACCESS HATCH, CONTROL. PANEL AND PUMP CONTROLS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL LIFT STATION AND VALVE VAULT ITEMS. THESE ITEMS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO PUMPS, PIPING, ACCESS HATCH, CONTROL PANEL, PUMP CONTROLS AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT. 3. ALL BOLTS AND HARDWARE INSIDE WET WELL AND VALVE MANHOLE SHALL BE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. 4. COAL -TAR Epoxy COATING SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL INTERNAL SURFACES IN WET WELL, CONCRETE OR METALLIC, INCLUDING ALL PIPING AND VALVES. S. ALL PRECAST SECTIONS SMALL BE TIED WITH BOLTED BRACKET (SEE DETAIL) AT EACH JOINT -4 AT 90' SPACING. 6. STEEL VENT PIPE SHALL BE PRIME COATED BY FABRICATOR AND PAINTED WITH SHERWIN WILLIAMS ZEPHYR, SW 4020 OR EQUAL 7. VERIFY SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PLACEMENT AND ALIGNMENT WITH PUMP MANUFACTURER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ORIENTATION OF UFT STATION AND PIPING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF UFT STATION. 9. ACCESS HATCH SIZE AND LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH PUMP SUPPLIER. FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER 4" CV - 4" PV HOSE CONNECTOR - SEE DETAIL 4" PV -� 4" MJ COUPLING 4"x4"x4" WYE -,,"""4" 4" — 4., FORCEMAIN C EL=xxx FORCEMAIN UFT (BY OTHERS) STATION PAY REM NOTE: ESTE -PLAN DRAWING FOR CONTINUATION 4" SCHEDULE 40 WELDED STEEL PIPE VENT WITH COLLAR NEENAH R -1755 -F2 ------T TOP 7" SLAB 1 EL=XXX 4" CHECK VALVE 4" PLUG VALVE HOSE CONNECTOR (NORTH PIPE ONLY) -SEE DETAIL 84" DIA ML I 4" PLUG VALVE 4" fORCEM- 50 - Tljf C/LE1930.50 BASE 7' DIA OR 7'x7' SQUARE, 6"THICK 85@12"OC EW GROUT TO DRAM 12" GRANULAR FLLL� PROVIDE SUPPORT 4- 4" DIA STEEL VENT PIPE -0' MJ 36"x36" ACCESS NPLING HATCH ABOVE NEW 60"/72" DIA r SUBMERSIBLE LIFT STATION 1I CONTROL PAI i PUMPS 8" INFLUENT 91/2' INV --925.00 PLAN 36"x36" ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION WITH PUMP SUPPLIER CONTROL PANEL 8" THICK PRECAST COVER EL=937.00 GRADE EL=XXX ---PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS WITH R4 JOINTS LEAVE A 5' LOOP IN CABLE FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES FLOAT SUPPORT PROVIDE 25 LB COATED PEDESTAL CAST IRON WEIGHT WITH 1/8" DIA MIN. STAINLESS STEEL CABLE FOR MOUNTING LEVEL SENSORS —LIFTING CHAIN PUMP GUIDES FLOAT CONTROL (LYP) 8"INFLUENT HIGH LEVEL ALARM BASE EL=920.00 eR` •°?'fie. "L CAST 8'4"x81-0" SQUARE OR W DIA x 12" CONCRETE BASE (TYP) AROUND UFT STATION AND PROTRUDING REINFORCING yr n -o U w nr L-12" COMPACTED (8) BARS CAST INTO CONC BASE GRANULAR FILL 4" DISCHARGE ELBOW SECTION DUPLEX PUMP LIFT STATION NOT TO SCALE ( NOTES: BOLTON ®IRITMOTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR REPLACED AT THE XXX a�.w DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER, MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES APPROVED 8" USE 111.11 OR STEEL ROD AND LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENTS EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT FOR REMOVAL ACCEPTABILITY LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. WHEN REMOVING OR OR MAINTAINING INLET PROTECTION, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN SO THAT THE d' / FOR INLETS WITH CAST SEDIMENT TRAPPED ON THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC DOES NOT FALL IN THE INLET. ANY MATERIAL FALLING INTO THE INLET SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. CURB BOX USE WOOD C1.01 1 2x4, EXTEND 10" BEYOND WIDTH ON BOTH © FINISHED WE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED, SHALL EXTEND A J2" GRATE MINIMUM Of 10" AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FAQLiTATI MAINTENANCE OR SIDES, LENGTH VARIES, SECURE TO GRATE WITH REMOVAL WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2.4, ENGINEER'S NAME �.�. xxlDtll MMJODIYYYY INSTALLATION NOTES: MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SECTION IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30", MEASURED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP Of THE GRATE. PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS F-1 TRIM EXCESS FABRIC IN THE FLOW LINE TO WITHIN 3" OF THE GRATE. Y Q THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE, BETWEEN THE INLET AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES, OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING O�,"� PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3" CLEARANCE. THE TIES SHALL BE PLACED z AT A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG, INLET PROTECTION a utijTEXTILE BAG En NOT TO SCALE � DETAIL LOG BO LTO N 0 ORONO PLATE NO: INLET PROTECTION REVISIONS: DATE: J ERO-102 GEOTEXTILE BAG & M E N K'' Real People. Real Solutions. NOTE: OWNER WILL SUPPLY PUMPS, LIFTING CHAINS, GUIDE RAILS, BRACKETS, ACCESS HATCH, CONTROL. PANEL AND PUMP CONTROLS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL LIFT STATION AND VALVE VAULT ITEMS. THESE ITEMS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO PUMPS, PIPING, ACCESS HATCH, CONTROL PANEL, PUMP CONTROLS AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT. 3. ALL BOLTS AND HARDWARE INSIDE WET WELL AND VALVE MANHOLE SHALL BE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. 4. COAL -TAR Epoxy COATING SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL INTERNAL SURFACES IN WET WELL, CONCRETE OR METALLIC, INCLUDING ALL PIPING AND VALVES. S. ALL PRECAST SECTIONS SMALL BE TIED WITH BOLTED BRACKET (SEE DETAIL) AT EACH JOINT -4 AT 90' SPACING. 6. STEEL VENT PIPE SHALL BE PRIME COATED BY FABRICATOR AND PAINTED WITH SHERWIN WILLIAMS ZEPHYR, SW 4020 OR EQUAL 7. VERIFY SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PLACEMENT AND ALIGNMENT WITH PUMP MANUFACTURER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ORIENTATION OF UFT STATION AND PIPING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF UFT STATION. 9. ACCESS HATCH SIZE AND LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH PUMP SUPPLIER. FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER 4" CV - 4" PV HOSE CONNECTOR - SEE DETAIL 4" PV -� 4" MJ COUPLING 4"x4"x4" WYE -,,"""4" 4" — 4., FORCEMAIN C EL=xxx FORCEMAIN UFT (BY OTHERS) STATION PAY REM NOTE: ESTE -PLAN DRAWING FOR CONTINUATION 4" SCHEDULE 40 WELDED STEEL PIPE VENT WITH COLLAR NEENAH R -1755 -F2 ------T TOP 7" SLAB 1 EL=XXX 4" CHECK VALVE 4" PLUG VALVE HOSE CONNECTOR (NORTH PIPE ONLY) -SEE DETAIL 84" DIA ML I 4" PLUG VALVE 4" fORCEM- 50 - Tljf C/LE1930.50 BASE 7' DIA OR 7'x7' SQUARE, 6"THICK 85@12"OC EW GROUT TO DRAM 12" GRANULAR FLLL� PROVIDE SUPPORT 4- 4" DIA STEEL VENT PIPE -0' MJ 36"x36" ACCESS NPLING HATCH ABOVE NEW 60"/72" DIA r SUBMERSIBLE LIFT STATION 1I CONTROL PAI i PUMPS 8" INFLUENT 91/2' INV --925.00 PLAN 36"x36" ALUMINUM ACCESS HATCH VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION WITH PUMP SUPPLIER CONTROL PANEL 8" THICK PRECAST COVER EL=937.00 GRADE EL=XXX ---PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS WITH R4 JOINTS LEAVE A 5' LOOP IN CABLE FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES FLOAT SUPPORT PROVIDE 25 LB COATED PEDESTAL CAST IRON WEIGHT WITH 1/8" DIA MIN. STAINLESS STEEL CABLE FOR MOUNTING LEVEL SENSORS —LIFTING CHAIN PUMP GUIDES FLOAT CONTROL (LYP) 8"INFLUENT HIGH LEVEL ALARM BASE EL=920.00 eR` •°?'fie. "L CAST 8'4"x81-0" SQUARE OR W DIA x 12" CONCRETE BASE (TYP) AROUND UFT STATION AND PROTRUDING REINFORCING yr n -o U w nr L-12" COMPACTED (8) BARS CAST INTO CONC BASE GRANULAR FILL 4" DISCHARGE ELBOW SECTION DUPLEX PUMP LIFT STATION NOT TO SCALE ( ■mtmaa arrwsmaw�RVTaRAnax aHnoarrws•a •aao m���a�,rq�■�ryn•"xsbxpmnux,uanaarurnueo vu•ssronuensma•viwmr«suxsar,<sr�rearwrxasaw BOLTON - 25385HAOOW LANE, SURE 200SHEET CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 XXX a�.w CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA SOUTHWAYS LIFT STATION ,—, t Ln >` m e` ((952) 448- lotl C1.01 t a & M E N K EmadPI com ` LIFT STATION DETAIL z e ENGINEER'S NAME �.�. xxlDtll MMJODIYYYY z —.bohoa-memk— U� c: a (-.F--- .-}— 3' LEVEL (MIN) —?-- 4" OVERLAP ANCHOR SLOT ALTERNATIVE 1'SPACING ON STAPLES NOTE: ANCHOR, OVERLAP & STAPLE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOLD UNDER 6" EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION NOT TO SCALE DETAIL LOG BO LTO N ORONO PLATE NO: EROSION CONTROL REVISIONS: DATE:& MEN K a " ERO-200 BLANKET INSTALL 'f t 'mss Real People. Real Solutions. ... 9Af 5 H�IY'{. 3" MINUS WASHED— COARSE AGGREGATE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) 18" MIN CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE - MnDOT TYPE V (3733) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE DETAIL LOG BO LTO N ORONO PLATE NO: ROCK REVISIONS: DATE: ERO-502 CONSTRUCTION > x & MEN K ENTRANCE Real People. Real Solutions. U ry CL 41 O 8-2 N a W ,—, z z Ln >` QW U� a '-0 W A z Z FI z ] U� c: a Lei F-1 t/j Y Q ca�-p0 O�,"� p z � U) a o En L.UV) OJ � w � A o N C;8 :4 3 a O _I 4 -p (UN p � J � �z W = wz� -0 w in z z z W LIQ -C O _ 3 0 : ~ 101 V' U ry CL 41 O 8-2 N L L •CT 0 U C >` QW p U 0 0 Z U� c: U �0,c aEag ca�-p0 p aC 0 En L.UV) OJ C N E� e 00 3 i N 4 -p (UN p 0 L _ i -0 in L N -c 0 -C _ 3 0 : Southways Lift Station Orono 1 �XISTJNG WS cbURT i L I + r G ob4V ; L4 �, Fi 777777 �� � y r'= AT FLARED END ! rF !I 1 r! R � ID F.lsfff i • � M1 -.moi 0 3 + - 4 P arm _ 1 4 + D _v{}J _j}���J 8df PVC SANITARY sz 'WER PROPOSED 1 r�� # �'L CP CUL V T PROPOSED/' 002 Figure #: 1BOLTON May 2, 2018 0& MEN K PROPOSED LIFT STATION RIM'"'' 937!0 E Y = 925.0 SUMP ^920.0 TENNIS } TENN COURT*�* �i 4 ; + —H yl ,34— � in T 4 TO k 'RAIN GARDEN - } i ,4 L =9.0 1 � r RC • F � t 0 10 20 HORZ. SCALE FEET CATCH BA51Pi RIM; --(936,72) INV= 533.'# CATCH R1 9 INV— � EXISTING MAW� INv=[sz .79 I+ ! PRIVATE I OAD PROPOS & NEW REMOVE FES 1 " RCP DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) SOUTHWAYS PROJECT NO. I8-3998 This DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ("Contract") dated 2018, is by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"); and JAMES R. JUNDT AND MARY JOANN JUNDT, husband and wife ("Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for "SOUTHWAYS" (referred to in this Contract as the "Plat"). The land to be subdivided by the Plat ("Land") is situated in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the Plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract and furnish the security required by it. The City will cause the Plat to be duly recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, promptly after compliance by the Developer with all conditions 1 Southways V3 precedent to such recording pursuant to this Contract, which conditions precedent the Developer shall cause to be satisfied within 180 days after the City Council approves the final Plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Land, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary "security" (defined below) has been received by the City, and 3) the Plat has been duly recorded in the office of said County Recorder. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. N/A 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. N/A 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the Land unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract with respect to property which did not receive final plat approval prior to any such amendment. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Land shall be developed in accordance with the following plans (collectively, the "Plans"). The Plans shall not be attached to this Contract. The erosion control plan may also be approved by Hennepin County Environmental Services and N innehaha Creek Watershed District. If the Plans vary from the terms of this Contract, the terms of this Contract shall control. The Plans are: 2 Southways V3 Plan A — Plat of Southways Plan B — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C —Landscape Plan Plan D — SWPPP Plan Plan E — Conservation Design Report and Master Plan Plan F — Tree Preservation Plan Plan G — Street and Utility Plan Plan H — Stormwater Maintenance Plan S. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built in accordance with the approved Plans (the "Improvements"): A. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control B. Setting of Iron Monuments C. Surveying and Staking D. Stormwater Management Facilities E. Sanitary Sewer System F. Streets G. Concrete Curb and Gutter H. Underground Utilities I. Retaining Walls The Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances including those concerning erosion and drainage and any prohibiting grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been 3 5outhways V3 prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work as the City may reasonably determine. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Improvements and before the "security" is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" Plans, and an electronic file of the "as constructed" Plans in an auto CAD file based upon the Hennepin County coordinate system, all prepared in accordance with City standards. Developer will install any required sidewalks and trails just prior to the installation of the final lift of asphalt. 9. IRON MONUMENTS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 505.021 and the Orono City Code, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the "security" is released The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed 10. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to the following to the extent required: 4 Swthways V3 • Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of - Way • DNR for Dewatering • City of Orono for Building Permits • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for erosion control permit and storm water management permit • NPDES Permits (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems) issued by MPCA 11. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors' and subcontractors' responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all Improvements as contemplated by Section 8 and the approved Plans by December 31, 2019, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The final wear course on streets shall be installed between August 15th and September 15th the first summer after the base layer of asphalt has been in place one freeze thaw cycle. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the "security" to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement must have the written approval of the City Engineer, and may be delayed or scheduled at any time of the year based upon existing site conditions at the discretion of the City Engineer. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Land to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with development of the Laud. 5 Southways V3 14. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the storm water pollution prevention plan, and the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within five (5) days after the completion of the work, weather permitting, or in an area that is inactive for more than ten (10) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the "security" to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Land is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 15. GRADING PLAN. The Land shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading, drainage, and erosion control plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Orono specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, 6 5outhways V3 swales, and ditches for public drainage have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may issue building permits to the Developer, prior to completion of all grading, provided the City Engineer has determined that adequate erosion control measures are in place. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, and ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and house pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer certifies to the City that all lots with house footings placed on fill will have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed FHA/HUD 79G specifications. 16. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction workby the Developer, builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Land, the Developer shall comply with all recommendations of the City staff and City Engineer regarding site cleanup and restoration, including but not limited to contaminated soil removal, junk and debris removal, etc. Also, prior to any construction on the Land, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 17. OWNERSffiP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and final acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 18. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for engineering administration. City Southways V3 engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in the "security." Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates. These fees shall be billed monthly. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Contract, the Developer shall deposit $10,000 cash with the City ("Escrow"). All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs (including, but not limited to, planning, engineering oversight, or legal consultant review) the City has incurred or will incur related to the Development and for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred or will incur to assure that the work is completed in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and the provisions of Orono City Code Chapter 79. The Escrow may also be used by the City to eliminate any hazardous conditions associated with the work and to repair any damage to public property or infrastructure that is caused by the work associated with this Contract, if compliance with the terms of this Contract are not accomplished. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn send a bill to the Developer. The Developer shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Developer's receipt of bill. In the event that the Developer does not make payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in this Section, the City may immediately thaw from the escrow account without further approval of the Developer to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred. If the balance of the escrow account is insufficient to reimburse the City its costs under this Section, the Developer will promptly reimburse the City any additional costs. If the 8 Southways v3 eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow and are not promptly reimbursed by the Developer, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 415.01 and 366.012. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the Developer when the Development has been completed and written notification is received from the Developer requesting the funds. 19 STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE. The Land is subject to the standard Stone Water and Drainage Trunk Fee for three new two -acre lots at $4,030.00 per lot. $4,030.00 per acre per lot x 3 lots = (4,030 x 2 x 3) = $24,180.00 20. PARK DEDICATION FEE. The Land is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement for the City of Orono. Because the value of each newly created lot in the Plat will be in excess of the threshold value of $69,375.00, the eight percent (8%) park fee cap of $5,550.00 per lot will apply; therefore, the Park Dedication Fee is calculated as follows: 3 lots x $5,550.00 per lot = $16,650.00 21. LANDSCAPING. All landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Developer shall post a $69,277.00 landscaping security at the time of final Plat approval to ensure that the landscaping is installed win accordance with the approved Plan. 22. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to development of the Land: A. Implementation of and adherence to the findings and conditions listed in (1) Resolution No. 6835 approving the Preliminary Plat for Southways File No. 18-3998, adopted 9 Southways V3 by the Orono City Council on February 26, 2018; and (2) Resolution No. approving the Final Plat for Southways, adopted by the Orono City Council on , 2018. S. Final Plat approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") approval and permits as required. The City will not approve the Plat until the MCWD has approved the stormwater management plans and the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. C. The Plat shall adhere to the purpose and intent of the Orono Community Management Plan, as amended. D. All of the proposed lots must contain suitable area meeting all established setback requirements to allow the construction of single family residences. E. Prior to City Council approval of the final Plat, the Developer shall furnish a boundary survey of the Land with all property corner monumentation of the Land in place and marked with lath and a flag. Any encroachments on or adjacent to the Land shall be noted on the survey. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. F. The Developer shall provide the city engineer record construction drawings. The city will upgrade its base map information relative to the project. Costs incurred will be billed to the developer. G. The Developer shall submit the final Plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be Auto CAD file. The Developer shall also submit two complete sets of the Plat on Mylar (one copy for the City's records and one copy for recording with Hennepin County). The Developer shall also provide one copy reduced to 1" = 200'. to Southways V3 H. The Developer shall relocate the public street and public utilities as depicted on the Plat. The cost of relocation and the cost of installation of the liRstation is the Developer's responsibility. The city will provide the plans and specifications of the liiistation. 23. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of the costs of all Improvements and construction of all Improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto (the "security"), from a bank for 150% of the cost of the Improvements, including any required landscaping. The following is a summary of the security requirements due under this Contract, which must be in place at the time of final plat approval: ,Category Bid Amount Landscaping $ 46,185.00 Common Excavating $ 98,600.00 _ 15006 $ 69,277.50 , $ 147,900.00 Sanitary Sewer $ 129,350.00 $ 194,025.00 Storm Sewer-- Street _Erosion Control Lift Station Total $ 28,750.00 $ 186,500.00 $ 33,500.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 43,125.00 $ 279,750.00 $ 50,250.00 $ 225,000.00 $1,009,327.50 Notes Includes removal/ filling of old sewer Includes C15 and old road removal Includes rock Ent, traffic control, and mob Engineers estimate The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, upon five (5) business days' prior written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts necessary to cure the default. If the Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been 11 5outhways V3 satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer, and approved by City's Engineer, shall be retained as security until all Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" Plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 24. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS AND FEES. The following is a summary of the cash requirements and fees due under this Contract, which must be paid in cash at the time of final plat approval and execution of this Contract by the City: Engineering, City Administration (escrow) $ 2,500.00 Park Dedication Fee 16,650.00 Storm Water and Drain&,:e Trunk Fee 24.180.00 Total Cash Requirements & Fees $43 330.00 25. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Improvements against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by the City Council. The one year warranty period on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed and accepted by the City Council as documented in official City minutes. The Developer shall post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit (the "Maintenance Security") in an amount reasonably determined by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall examine the condition of the Improvements when determining the amount of the Maintenance Security. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security until the Maintenance Security is furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first 12 Southways V3 occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. 26. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Land, including but not limited to Hennepin County Environmental Services and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Land. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Plat approval and development of the Land. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the Land, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bilis submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not 13 5outhways V3 paid on time, the City may halt development and construction of the Land until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges as required by City ordinance or via other agencies for which City acts as agent may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer access charges ("SAC"), City water access charges and building permit fees. 27. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the Land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part against any portion of the Land owned by the Developer or any successor in interest to the Developer. 28. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Land until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 14 Southways V3 this Contract. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including those for lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Contract. E. Grading and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all streets prior to issuance of any building permits. F. If building permits are issued prior to the completion of all Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Improvements and damage to Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with at least one lift of bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer in writing. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the Land and may be recorded against the Land. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Land and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form 15 Southways V3 attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Land; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Land; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots in the Plat, the Land, or any part of it. Upon request, the City shall provide, in recordable form, a release of any lot in the Plat from this Development Contract if the City determines that the teams and conditions of this Contract have been satisfied. K Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from vacant lots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. L. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls required to be constructed by the Plans, or special conditions referred to in this Contract, shall be constructed 16 Southways V3 before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. M. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. 29. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: James and Mary Jundt, C/O Brian Benson, 201 East Lake St. Wayzata, MN. 55391. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Orono City Hall, 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota 55356. Either party may change the address to which notices to such party thereafter shall be given, by providing to the other party notice of such change. 17 Southways V3 CITY OF ORONO Dennis Walsh, Mayor (SEAL) Dustin Rief, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018 by Dennis Walsh and by Dustin Rief, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 18 Southways V3 DEVELOPER: J es R- Jundt Mary). J dt STATE OF ARIZONA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f14 day of 2018, by James R. Jundt and Mary J. Jundt, husband and wife. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBM.L KNOTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651)452-5000 ABS 19 Southways V3 Sszan Almalih Notary Public Maricopa County, Arizona ,o„ My Commission Expires 07-10-2020 Exhibit A Lots 5 and 6, Rearrangement of Orono Point; Also, that part of Lots 9 and 10, Rearrangement of Orono Point and the accretions thereto lying Southerly and Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Center Avenue 588.95 feet northerly from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 5, Rearrangement of Orono Point; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet, thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 107.3 feet; thence westerly making an angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes to the right a distance of 79.3 feet to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and there terminating; subject to Boarder Avenue as opened by Document No. 2092886, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Center Avenue as said Center Avenue was dedicated to the public in the plat of Rearrangement of Orono Point, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 4, said Rearrangement of Orono Point and northerly of a line drawn westerly perpendicular to the west line of said Lot 4 from a point on said west line distant 182.29 feet northerly from the southwest corner of said Lot 4; also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying southerly of said above described perpendicular line; and also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying northerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 4 and lying southerly of a line drawn easterly at right angles to the westerly line of said vacated Center Avenue from the point of intersection of said westerly line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following described line; Commencing at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly from the northwesterly corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Boarder Avenue as laid out and dedicated over and across part of Lot 9 in said Rearrangement of Orono Point which lies between the westerly line of said Center Avenue and a line drawn across said Border Avenue at right angles to the side lines of said Border Avenue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border Avenue with a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the centerline of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly 20 Southways V3 tangent to last said curve a distance of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 56 feet a distance of 19.7 feet; thence southerly tangent to last said curve a distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7 feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5 feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 21 Southways V3 Doc No Al 0633774 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Mar 5, 2018 2:51 PM Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, County Recorder Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 92 Pkg ID 1663416E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. $46.00 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6835 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELL IINARY PLAT FOR SOUTHWAYS FILE NO. 18-3998 WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, James R. and Mary Joann Jundt, husband and wife ("Applicant[s]"), applied for a preliminary plat for the property legally described in Exhibit A, (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on February 20th, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 20th, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested preliminary plat as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #18-3998. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1A Zoning District. 3. The property is guided for Low Density Residential in the 2030 Community Management Plan. 4. The Property contains 13.78 acres in area and has a defined lot width of over 1000 feet on the west side ad over 600 feet on the east side. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 68 3 5 5. The property will be served by municipal sanitary sewer and private wells. 6. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 7. The parcel will be subdivided into 5 buildable lots and platted right of way. All lots conform to the size and width requirements of the city code. 8. The Developer has prepared grading plans to manage stormwater on site without negatively impacting adjacent parcels 9. Access to the property is via the existing Bracketts Point Road, a public street. 10. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed subdivision upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. 11. The Parks, Trails and Open Space element of the Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) has no current plans for parks that specifically require dedication of park land from this property. The City will confirm the park dedication required at the time of final plat. 12. The developer has submitted a Conservation Design Report and Master Plan prepared by Kjohlaug Environmental Services Company dated December 13, 2017 that inventories and describes in detail the environmental features of the site, defining what natural values of the site should be preserved or enhanced and how that should occur. 13. There are no wetlands on the property. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants preliminary plat approval to allow the subdivision of the property into 5 lots, as depicted on the plans dated December 6, 2017 prepared by Gronberg and Associates, attached as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: PA A. Project Specific Conditions CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNcu, NO. 6835 1. The applicable general engineering comments and or conditions provided by City Engineer dated January 9, 2018 attached hereto as Exhibit C shall be suitably addressed by applicant in the development plan submittal. 2. Easements shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. 3. Regardless of timing of construction on lots 1, 2, or 3, Block 1, the Average Lake Shore Setback shall be 84 feet from the Ordinary High Water line lots on all sides. The Average Lake Shore for lots in Block 2 shall be as regulated by city code at time of construction. 4. Approval of the Final Plat within 1 year of the date of Council approval of the preliminary plat. 5. Development shall adhere to the proposed Basic Conservation Design Master Plan. 6. Significant trees shall be preserved to the extent possible and as shown on the landscaping plans. 7. Upon evidence of resettlement history, the developer will contact the city and the State Historical Preservation Office prior to proceeding. 8. Additional approvals a. Vacation of Bracketts Point Road and Sanitary Sewer easement doc 6878945 as described herein. 9. The following estimated fees are due at the time of final plat unless otherwise noted a. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk: The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee (SW&DT Fee) of $32,240 (Minimum acre per lot (2) times number of new lots (4) times per acre amount ($4,030). b. Water and Sewer: The costs to relocate the sanitary sewer will be the developers responsibility. The Metropolitan Council SAC charge which is currently $2,485 per dwelling unit will be due at the time of building permit for each lot. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6835 c. Park dedication: $22,200 ($5,550 x 4 new lots) B. General conditions imposed on preliminary plats shall apply, and are as follow: 1. Appropriate traffic control signage within and pertinent to the site shall be installed by the Developer subject to the City Engineer's review and approval. 2. Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as administrator of the WCA regulations on Orono's behalf, are complied with. 3. Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and to the approved SWPPP. All erosion controls as required by the City and the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencing grading and excavation on the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working order until the site is vegetated and stabilized. 4. The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and vegetation outside of the construction limits area. Developer shall identify trees to be preserved on site, shall mark them on a site plan, and shall take extraordinary measures such as fencing, signage, etc. to ensure they are not disturbed. 5. This approval is based upon the known issues that may affect this project, but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as the review process continues. 6. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 7. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat will expire on that date (February 26, 2019). CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6835 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. C. Plans and Specifications. The following plans and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions: 1) Final plans and specifications for all proposed utility lines and services, including any proposed revisions to existing service facilities. Proposed plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the Final Plan set. The Public Works Department and any other pertinent reviewing agencies shall review and approve all utility improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided and are subject to approval by the Public Works Department and City Engineer. 2) Final Street and Storm Sewer Plans. 3) Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP showing existing and proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. General Development Plan Approval will not be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater plans. 4) Landscaping plan to reflect a more natural pattern of replacement trees, versus a lineal replacement pattern along the new Bracketts Point 5) Any additional plans and specifications deemed necessary by the City as review progresses. D. Platting Process. Applicant shall complete all requirements for Final Plat Approval as follows. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the City Administrator 2 weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1). Record plat drawings in the form of two (3) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" _ 200'. Drawing to include: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL NO. 6835 A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Gronberg and Associates dated December 6, 2017 attached hereto as Exhibit B, except as modified herein. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property lines. C. Dedication of "Drainage Easements" over all drainageways D. Name of plat. 2). Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. Signed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of improvements. The City Engineer shall establish the amount to be provided in the Letter of Credit. 3). Fees required: Application fee, Park dedication, Stormwater and Drainage Trunk enumerated above. E. Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the development. F. Financial Guarantee. The Development Agreement shall include a financial guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The City Engineer shall complete an estimate of improvement costs, including but not limited to streets, curb & gutter, sanitary sewers, landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, and stormwater management facility construction, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of 150% of the improvement costs. 6 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6835 ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 261' day of February, 2018. A ST: CITY OF ORONO: a Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6835 Exhibit A Legal Description Lots 5 and 6, Rearrangement of Orono Point; Also, that part of Lots 9 and 10, Rearrangement of Orono Point and the accretions thereto lying Southerly and Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline of Center Avenue 588.95 feet northerly from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 5, Rearrangement of Orono Point; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet, thence southwesterly tangent to said last described curve a distance of 107.3 feet; thence westerly making an angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes to the right a distance of 79.3 feet to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and there terminating; subjectto Boarder Avenue as opened by Document No. 2092886, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Center Avenue as said Center Avenue was dedicated to the public in the plat of Rearrangement of Orono Point, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 4, said Rearrangement of Orono Point and northerly of a line drawn westerly perpendicular to the west line of said Lot 4 from a point on said west line distant 182.29 feet northerly from the southwest comer of said Lot 4; also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying southerly of said above described perpendicular line; and also that part of the westerly half of vacated Center Avenue lying northerly ofthe westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 4 and lying southerly of a line drawn easterly at right angles to the westerly line of said vacated Center Avenue from the point of intersection of said westerly line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following described line; Commencing at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly from the northwesterly corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, that part of vacated Boarder Avenue as laid out and dedicated over and across part of Lot 9 in said Rearrangement of Orono Point which lies between the westerly line of said Center Avenue and a line drawn across said Border Avenue at right angles to the side lines of said Border Avenue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border Avenue with a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant 588.95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the centerline of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of feet; thence southwesterly along atangential curve to the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to last said curve a distance of 107.30 feet; thence southwesterly along atangential curve to the left with a radius of 56 feet a distance of 19.7 feet; thence southerly tangent to last said curve a distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7 feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5 feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Resolution Exhibit B SOUTHWAYS PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JAMES & MARY JUNDT 6 8 3 5 IN LOTS 5, 6, 9 AND 10, AND VACATED BORDER AVE. AND CENTER AVENUE REARRANGEMENT OF ORONO POINT yty HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA O`A IsOu �sa�re+ 6 v� , (nen rnm Amenem rnm wr•sa ca n4e emnaumen, w. tr-awe, aoeea 1,-0-tT.) x19 Lo,e s and e. aw.•�o•nnA m aam peeM; AL90 Tlnt Dnre m Lob 9 mW 10. Reanemmit m 0— Pont atl Or meellar• 9•ralo M^A SooaM ua E m te• f 4aa Ws Covmxeq m a poM In am mAa6p of pa4a I,n•, ro, natwnY me Natwo,eNv m toe e, st or sono 1 lour r(a4 t1FA uraWn�W 111 fMoavtamiuS abrcewa, m.IM1.Otm - N 1nm' oo' "�i rro .roDeOaw"YOm +°ss.nt iox ar'a.� witex r�°te�e :y �t284 HUAQTT'9 PopT ROaO ^pal x,.N W w�'M^I w eok tWt mwmm eurva o aatane m lOr3 hetbu.ea omarlr wrrraF m ae�em .9 rawm m ms ryn a ama•e m res ime me ma m EArk dmsineAne ,nro ^d '' l0'St' 00' temi4meEN .ejvol m eamr Asea m rc•ea M Oce fdp. 2a9re9A M�apN Canty. 14vmota � S �J•<y. �'A � �; /' ' Sp'� amo Imt port or rmam4 Conte Aeam m ops Cala aY•ne •m aeamua m MMe ygbio n Uw pot m QW 2v / � �, �m�goM l m Pao Pm�l and �osly m a Ya trbnlymlvlY aG•pmaalor W IM wn� 63. of Wk / , I J i,3., 6 ken a print m nda •Ne e• amoral 16280 IM MMY Iram a• ewmaml cai•i m mk Lat 4; '� / ase tlat 1 m tw me,erry hp m woataa Cmla A Isirm uWMy A mq Noq Oveppe0 papagiWe Gui 3.q 4m tivt pa{ m UN tepsly MI m v¢maE Cala Avann Mro nMa•Iy m i, ` o.ff Ne .aaterty mtmcM or iM rgpwry 6s m ed! lm a •y ybq ypyapry m p 0r- dran mRrry iR m rbd uCm b tle smt�^/ Na m WO vRafeO GRm Avec hal Yb pWne m IplwwcdOn m nu0 �q talr ma .an a mr a-� 10 roe ame m 4,e rob.0q aaeaam uc comnwnaq m o pdrt N ,ne enaesne m eaa �sertu A.n.. ama� seam fo, wovy rmm ens mrowncsyy cwar..�w m am'"y^' 1 � a•• ads tee x Dace oaamrr sea wd omearr a em•ne m s rens m me point of t•weev m n. 1 om nein amemem a oamo�mfr W� •Dia iee%rw'�ea�nt`y�ipn wi rp�e oe az+.n , �JO.yF � � i rml p etacs of r b4 3.E oak 63. ROAD POTO W / �b i 'lbw oo• M w w, or wowea mm A.w.. m kle 3.e ink aeavaw om o3. mine pa, pl I.m o b, ink VACATED ..' / / wrn ; 9emm'sJarm�t or Oran Pgne +NM Mae ne1•em 3.e amealY e• m eaa Casa A_ m9 a eb � aapu bmm T Ba Ea Aranm m r' mar eke 9+ve of cad Reser Avenu hom Um poM aA�e•�prolav' /Np ,p m baw N eon a`.°Am eia avr,e amara pseaes `rA a rmreame mmw't Of �.. i• .mow ';,\ so , °w�ri°m s: Deme pmmoy Dray sr �9•m�. m eas coca .•en o e�,oce m s lot Dose x e6^sT re' • � � �6' �� 1 \ :. aJtert�q�w ��Ymuaw_o�r tapert to (int � om�o�ast elm S ra�ek`�ric�s aartl�wetalY � 9rV t I Nara �TM o o„Y Ufa mwa m ,ro 4Yt im a ro9u m MSr2 lest o a+tarce o! 11924 lat tFaen ate: w ' 1wM tmgen, IO int wk o..n p ama,u m tor.]O reef Armco .mnn.o,ey epentkl n �, /a/,u� � � man ort �u o .aam m s9 rot o aar•�mar�areyr� tlmce ea,enoty tagoe°giip"milogapk� omket P /9 ; �1 �'� 1. w�a amee wuaatY an a tumYW ,a Iro mit .iN p radha m r&1 rem m lb kta nt.rFa +- JJ a^ �^� m oro eor&r Armua am ink w mea emit' xamgdn eatly. Wmmmin I � / f �i �-� ..-'Y \ ' � fprmsl: avolm oreuv wol s..alaa men oo m.3. atm � J ��y/y -94 -: dmetm eda,+�p cmaw 6e, ram em mva sown XT q� � ass: 1-/9�stW� 6.o.ro em.m 3.r. bass .con an pea„m aou.e. mm «..or uaaroe to a•. ue pa.mb pr me app mpoa.a popreyw� / Wno \ / /1 1. ,, to w rvmorel cpm samba opoTmryMecaaye, roo}orS Mwtde o mN iM 1 , (/ � % Y � � .% e4' tt I , - ot._ _. pgroead bcmM m pgvwtl bt baee 3.q roma/ maapn a � rat a+Dat to ews my Ilh Ai+li Z� 6b- 9.r kkr0.•mw+'.ent.>mapmMm•rM ,�,:n�:, 1'/ a�,L ,,,� g �.I,I;i;t;' LAKE p0um Frl AREA/ 1 - 1 y `tV,A,,, �' -rte-fes 5� �'--� A' ;''?;, MINNETONKA \1 14 1 1) \\\�_. / ' ! /'�^ ' ,. ft_•.� _ pee. 'li I'1 0' BROWNS HAY g0 / 1 it maw , I\ �Ij" fit" t ; , 2 \ y l ; \;111�f3,; 2'1qk AO' t, K , , ., I Aq Oij HOUSE , PO55®LE _ / / \�/ / \ II `\� I',-mmiAn• lfa� rt11it1111i1�1i HOUSE ,u,3. /tV \ d. • ` �' \ '` '. POSSyE p� AREA Ae ?t (+^colm p,gAgTO T3X1 r LAKE ✓' LOT 2 MINNETONKA "RF" 1 p �. � saw s 6% l talo m.• f O/'YT SMITHS BAY \ ^ „ \ \ LOT A ' LOT 1 \\\ ,➢`.i ✓f a�,�� P JAMES : MARY :ATDT ZON NG m LR 1-A 1400 BRACKETT'S POW RD. TOTAL AREA m 13.78• A ORONO, WN 55391 ORY AREA MR! ACRES (NO WETLANDS) 05ascoy 3.dwd �tem pby eP.armmw a 3.t e PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, NI11NcRC a�na'am= 9wll CIM RancRIM LM SURVEYOW LWD 8 1. 443 NORTH WILLOW ORUE Lf9D LAIQ, M43338 0r R30982-473-414, Q& MLENK Real People. Real Solutions. January 9, 2418 City of Orono Attn: Jeremy Barnhart 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 18-3999 Southways Addition Engineering Review #1 Dear Jeremy: Resolution Exhibit C 635 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: [952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. In addition, Adam Edwards has provided comments for inclusion with this review. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL: 1.1 Stormwater management for the site to meet regulatory requirements is proposed through use of wet retention basins. The following should be considered regarding the proposed system: a. Volume control and water quality measures must be provided as well to meet NPDES requirements. Plans should be revised to include volume reduction equal to I" of runoff from the new impervious surface. If infiltration is considered infeasible, other methods of volume reduction must be considered. It appears that there are sufficient areas high enough above the water table to provide localized filtration practices or amended soils. Also, the overall estimate of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Phosphorus (TP) from proposed improvements must be reduced from pre -project conditions. Calculations detailing volume control and water quality compliance must be submitted for review and approval. If the applicant pursues a design with less than the normally required infiltration volume, sequencing of design to provide treatment to maximum extent practical must be provided. b. An Outlet Control Structure (OCS) that provides skimming must be installed on the wet retention ponds in order to keep floatables in ponds. The following should be considered regarding OCS design: i. The inlet pipe from the pond to the OCS should be submerged with back slope from the UCS to the pond to facilitate maintenance. The normal water level should be controlled by a weir in the structure or the outlet pipe. The inlet pipe should be one nominal size larger than the outlet pipe to limit flow control and turbulence at the pond interface. ii. A sloped rim should be utilized, per City Standard Details, with the bottom of the rim placed at the predicted 100 year high water level. iii. A trashguard should be installed on the outlet pipe. c. Wet retention basins must provide a minimum 1800 cubic feet per acre of drainage area. The stage -storage curves for permanent pools must be submitted for review to verify H:+OBNO\C13115486'z-18.3999 Brackets Poitnt'\Southways_Pre PlatRevlew-1_2018-01.09Aocx Ballon S Meek is an Preliminary Plat Application 18-3999 Southways Addition Page 2 6835 adequate storage is provided. d. A minimum 8' wide access bench along the top of the berm should be provided all the way around the pond to allow for inspection of outlets and future maintenance. e. The stormwater management plan should be revised as necessary to meet all requirements and resubmitted for review prior to Final Plat approval to ensure adequate siting is available for required facilities. 1.2 The condition of Rracketts Point Road to remain should be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work, and the existing condition should be documented with pictures. After completion of work, the street should be reviewed for damage, and the Contractor should be required to repair any damage deemed to be caused by site work. 1.3 Work within public right-of-way must be coordinated with the Public Works Department. Contractor must provide a minimum 48 hour notice prior to any work being performed. Notes should be revised accordingly. 1.4 Final Plans must include a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that meets NPDES requirements. The plan should include a rock construction entrance, perimeter silt fence, inlet protection, and ditch checks in swales. For specific requirements, refer to the following link: https://www.i)ca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files wq-strin2-68a.pdf 1.5 A Demolition/Removals Plans should be included with Final Plans to ensure items slated for demolition are removed as proposed and required. The Removals Plans should include items north and south of the site to make the street connections. 1.6 Per the meeting of December 20"' with the City, it is the City's understanding that the developer wishes to install a pressure system with lift station in lieu of what is depicted in the current plan set. A revised sanitary sewer plan must be submitted for review prior to final development approval. The plat should be revised to provide sufficient room for the lift station; including wet well, control panel and back-up generator; via the road ROW or a utility easement. The final design must conform to City standards and should include all pertinent City details. 1.7 The development will require the city to increase the capacity of Lift Station #9 which receives the sewage from the development area. The lift station is being remodeled/ rehabilitated this coming year. Larger pumps sized to handle the increased demand from the development is expected to add $1000 to the lift station projected. That difference should be borne by the developer. 1.8 For the sewer line designated to be abandoned all pipes must be removed or filled such that no subsurface voids remain. For sanitary manholes designated to be abandoned, the covers, rings, castings and any other structure must be removed to a minimum of 4 feet below the surface. The remaining structure must be backfilled to ensure no subsurface voids. This work should be indicated on the Final Removals Plan. 1.9 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 1.10 The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit (NPDES) to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than I acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 1.11 The applicant will be required to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A final copy of the permit should be submitted prior to construction. 1.12 The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-18-3999_BmckePs Point\Sauthw ys ?mPlatReview-1_2018-01-09.docx Bolton & Menk is an 6835 Preliminary PIat Application 18-3999 Southways Addition Page 3 and maintenance activities, designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities, and outline reporting requirements. 1.13 Clear drive lanes must be maintained on Brackets Point Road during construction. The Contractor will have to exercise care during mobilization of equipment to not block traffic, and parking for construction workers should be restricted to on-site only. The Contractor should submit a Traffic Control Plan prior to any work. Access must be maintained to properties south of site at all times. Plan should be approved by Fire Department and/or applicable emergency services. 1.14 A final estimated cost of proposed improvements, matching approved plans, must be submitted in order to determine the total Letter of Credit (LOC) amount. The LOC must be written to 150% of cost of improvements and submitted prior to any land disturbing activities. Estimated costs should include grading, erosion control, utilities, street construction, vegetation management, buffer establishment, temporary stabilization, and final stabilization. 1.15 Development grading, including the storm ponds and drainage ways, should be completed prior to acceptance of the development and release of the escrow. In addition, a copy of MCWD approval for the Stormwater Management system should be submitted prior to issuing any Certificates of Occupancy. 1.16 Record drawings trust be submitted upon completion of the project. 2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT / SITE PLAN: 2.1 A Flowage and Conservation easement will be required over any wetlands to remain. 2.2 Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided as follows: a. Over all stormwater management facilities used to meet regulatory requirements. b. All swales and storm sewer providing drainage for multiple properties. c. 5' along all side lot lines, unless adjacent to Development boundary. d. 10' along all front lot lines, rear lot lines, and adjacent to Development boundary. 3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN: 3.1 Perimeter erosion control should be installed by the Contractor and inspected by the City prior to any other work. Contractor must provide a minimum 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 3.2 Facilities necessary to meet regulatory requirements should be installed and the site mass - graded at the same time as street construction to ensure all drainage ways and watersheds are constructed per the approved Stormwater Management Plan. If done piece -meal, coordination of required stormwater management facilities can be difficult, and facilities required may be forgotten during future construction. 3.3 Pond emergency overflows should be provided at the predicted 100 year high water level and armored with Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM). 3.4 Additional spots and revised contouring should be provided in several areas to ensure a minimum b" swale depth is provided for swales providing conveyance to wet retention ponds per the approved Stormwater Management Plan. These spot elevations should be confirmed with record drawings prior acceptance of development. 3.5 The grading adjacent to the road should be revised as necessary to provide a minimum 2' depth for the ditch in the rural section per the City Standard Detail or follow the curb line in the urban section. H:\ORN6\C13115436\z-18-3999_Brackets Point\Southmys PmPlatRevlew-1 201"1.09.dor Belton & Menk * an Preliminary Plat Application 18-3999 Southways Addition Page 4 4.0 PRELIMINARY STREET PLAN 6835 4.1 A minimum IS" culvert should be provided under driveways and roads to limit potential for clogging. 4.2 Proposed curb should be indicated as B612 Curb and Gutter, and a detail should be provided with Final Plans. 4.3 Bituminous pavement should be saw -cut to full depth at connection to existing to provide clean match lines. Pavement at connection should match existing elevation and section. Final limits should be coordinated in the field with the City prior to any demolition work. 4.4 Pipe characteristics should be provided for all proposed storm sewer and culverts (i.e. invert elevations, diameter, length, slope, and material). Culverts under the roadway should be concrete. Provide minimum 2' cover. 5.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 5.1 The Final Landscape Plan should include the following: a. Types and locations of proposed restoration. b. Abandoned road should indicated removal of pavement and restoration type.. c. De -compaction of existing soils under removed impervious surfaces with 12" ripping depth prior to placement of topsoil. d. Areas disturbed by sanitary manhole removal. e. Restoration of the existing rain garden at the south street connection. f. Trees should be located so as not to interfere with drainage. In rural section areas, trees may need to be placed outside the right-of-way. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. j�2 0-�4 i "A Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, City of Orono H:\ORND\CI3115486\z-IB-3999-BrakeLs Polntj5out6ways_PmPlatReuiew-1_2018-01-09.do" Bollon & Menk is an AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 10 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-39 —Catherine Meyer, 493 Park Avenue, Variances —Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Consent Agenda Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances to develop anon -conforming lot. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and considered to be complete on April 16t''. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on June 15, 2018. Background/ Summary. The property owner recently requested a combination of the two PIDs into one property to be developed with a new home. The combined property is a small lot which qualifies for buildability without area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations. However, a condition for development of a nonconforming sized lot within the Shoreland ordinance is a hardcover limitation of 25% (the property is within Tier 3, which allows up to 35% hardcover). The owner wishes to develop the property with approximately 29% hardcover. In order to be able to exceed 25%, up to the 35% limit, lot area and width variances are required. The property owner has submitted plans which meet all of the LR -1B district setbacks and structural limitations. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On May 21St, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 in favor of a motion to approve the requested lot area and lot width variances conditioned upon the two lots being combined as submitted to Hennepin County. 5. Public Comment. No comments from the neighbors were received. 6. Staff Recommendation. The combination request has been received by Hennepin County. Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Proposed Plans Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 05/21/18 Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map Prepared By: YY1GG Reviewed By: J.Bamhart Approved By: -Sb CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-330 FILE NO. LA18-000039 WHEREAS, on April 16, 2018, Catherine Meyer (the "Applicant"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 493 Park Avenue, owned by the Applicant and legally described as: Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Minnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow development of a property with 0.25 acre in area where 1.0 acre is required, and having 100 feet in width where 140 feet is required; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA18-000039. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1 B Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.25 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 100 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 3 and hardcover is limited to 35% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Lot Width Variance b. Lot Area Variance 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." A single family residence is a permitted use within the LR -1 B zoning district. This criterion is met. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The residential principal structure and associated amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. This criterion is met. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The Owner is proposing to use the Property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The plight of the Owner is due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of the Property being platted long before local zoning codes were in effect. The CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Owner combined two PIDs in an attempt to make Property more conforming. This criterion is met; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The proposed home will be commensurate with the homes in the neighborhood and will not alter the character of the neighborhood. This criterion is met. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. This criterion is met. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1 B District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The lot area, lot width, setback, hardcover and lot coverage standards applying to the Property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood. This criterion is met. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The standards applicable to the Property apply to all other property in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 35% hardcover that other developed similar -sized lots are afforded, a variance to lot area and width is required. This criterion is met. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." In the opinion of staff, the property rights of the owner will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to be developed, nor will it be permitted the 35% hardcover level that neighboring similar -sized lots are allowed. This criterion is met. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The size and width of the Property, as well as the corner lot configuration create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the Owner. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow development of the substandard Property; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 03/25/18 by Gronberg and Associates, and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (June 11, 2019). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 11' day of June, 2018. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor LOT COMBINATION SURVEY FOR CATHERINE MEYER OF LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 2, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LOTS TO BE COMBINED: —17r— Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above discribed property, and the location of a proposed house, driveway, porches and topography thereon.. It does not purport to any other encroachments or improvements. Denotes found iron marker Denotes set iron marker 9B� - Denotes existing contour line (shot on 3-28-18) 0 20 40 80 :Denotes proposed contour line loos_z; Denotes proposed spot elevation Bearings are based on an assumed datum. SCALE IN FEET TOTAL LOT AREA = 10816+l- SO.FT. (0.25+1- ACRES) /TN GRt7NBEf2G & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIYIL €WOEWE€R5, UkN6 SURYEY6Rs, tAHO PUNNERS irsz 445 N. WILLOW ORNE LONG LANE, MN 55359 7�1f f CHAlJF•OR9J]1�1I1 CSY•O;S.d3i.1AR[ £XCI$YING /XH l j I e N 89`16'19" W 125.00 I �'-► o- o air - u_= - - loox }lI - _ o w m PROPOSED ELM HOUSE= 1�4i v'i 30 O Up gi O — 35 Y d4 #493 W L1©.0, 13.00 1.0 ....� L.t II S89?1T19-E 125.60 S 00'59'41"W -- 4.i2 7- - EJ I r2orao vEswY �' .Looe IB Q ..� 22.0 '� M1° C3 � BiALO�MR'n L _- S$7r LUUNES 30 v a '— X19 Z _ N 89:41'3$" E 46.23 OAK ECCE OF BLACKTOP PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (VERIFY) MH GARAGE = 1 C)02.2 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 1002.5 BASEMENT = 993.8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LOTS TO BE COMBINED: —17r— Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above discribed property, and the location of a proposed house, driveway, porches and topography thereon.. It does not purport to any other encroachments or improvements. Denotes found iron marker Denotes set iron marker 9B� - Denotes existing contour line (shot on 3-28-18) 0 20 40 80 :Denotes proposed contour line loos_z; Denotes proposed spot elevation Bearings are based on an assumed datum. SCALE IN FEET TOTAL LOT AREA = 10816+l- SO.FT. (0.25+1- ACRES) /TN GRt7NBEf2G & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIYIL €WOEWE€R5, UkN6 SURYEY6Rs, tAHO PUNNERS irsz 445 N. WILLOW ORNE LONG LANE, MN 55359 7�1f f CHAlJF•OR9J]1�1I1 CSY•O;S.d3i.1AR[ NW 'AiunoD uldauuaH e Ved purwn5 ejun3auulW 'Z 43010 `8'$' L 4101 rouajo I—V woifSCi iaAaLN auliay3e] ;JDJ>s 14,d aWON "N NW'4unoj UIOBUUB14 o _ - a Wed;IwwnS epuotauutpy'Z 4"I9 `8 T Z $xai foaar[a'�r Nod €a>1 r jaAayy 9uVa4te3 "Ni'afo.b awoN,.ak ^' $ MW '4wma u"dauuay S *A"mwwns"wmauutMI"a avcurn ria rawe�esr q 4 ----------------- 7AT C1 j W N: t U I_ Q NW'Aluno:) ul.dauuaW 'Reed ilwwn$ eluolauulW 'Z 47o111'8'8 C Slot j wwo wvn jnd iaAa6N auuac lei :JoI valaad MWDH MaN MW 'A3uno:) uldauuaH W q1ed 3iwwng eluoyauulW 'Z 11019 -8 IS L 5301 iaAaW auuay}e:) =uyI +Pld 10-H --N I S 00"59'41 " W- ' _. 4.72 M GARAGE = 1002.2 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 1002.5 BASEMENT = 993.8 M§ffW$je- �OZ A , *Q 0 MH 1 A i ME 0 MH This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above discribed property, and the location of a proposed house, driveway, porches and topography thereon.. It does not purport to any other encroachments or improvements. 0 Denotes found iron marker 0 Denotes set iron marker Denotes existing contour line (shot on 3-26-18) Denotes proposed contour line F1 -o 6-2 Denotes proposed spot elevation Bearings are based on an assumed datum. TOTAL LOT AREA = 10816+/- SQ.FT. (0.25+/- ACRES) a SCALE IN FEET KtVIbIUNb UtZ)1U1'4tL I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report DATE was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 3-26-18 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE BY REMARKS and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under 1 SCALE DRAWN the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11 =20' CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS JOB NO. -C -IrC —KE Ale- �-- ter, 18-067ILV# 445 N. WILLDRIVE LONG LAKE, NIN 65356 411M 00 DATE C MINN. LICENSE NU SHEET SHEETS of A MBER OF PHONE' OW E' 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 vk, Drawn Date: q•/6 -/g Iv - 1/4s' =1'-0" Drawn Date: Y L m a .E E m Y C O Cu C C Z O 47 °0 u 00 r- ad ad •E H c (Uu 0 v _ 'o = a a� O _,. Q 3 Y z a° M 41 ti Scale: =1'-0" nPAGE: i U-XY-W,' W �!�D_S3 �H�'Ftp•!#'Nj�..IAtt/�4�itAk�a.���7BS ��� r/M C1i OiJM � /T�CIC- 1 i4611 MSN• y_''__�,Nc. � x.�._1n�:_ -b rr C m rr to S rr H S"x 2 o i. 1 L. a 10 W 10 -roP (JF f:7,v1>Tn4 - ------ -�� p44 11> e J6f;,NAIJOS S-ryA. : -ML) TSOAR p . 71M--'!;!.,%.p�-L- 'Jp -fir - �--- /�,� DG S`i�iDS �4 y✓DO S��RT}�1"1i✓if RA C/✓1 U \A/ALL' ���--��G�� 1,✓ktLAirBnl 7 LI Drawn #-x,-18 Y m a E E m c O a, c c Z N � a °D u cv 00 C C o6 c a, u ° _ C O 4- t; O � a a� O E ;. Q Z 4 Scale: 1/4" =1'-0" 3.0 h tl i ii it it ti i U-XY-W,' W �!�D_S3 �H�'Ftp•!#'Nj�..IAtt/�4�itAk�a.���7BS ��� r/M C1i OiJM � /T�CIC- 1 i4611 MSN• y_''__�,Nc. � x.�._1n�:_ -b rr C m rr to S rr H S"x 2 o i. 1 L. a 10 W 10 -roP (JF f:7,v1>Tn4 - ------ -�� p44 11> e J6f;,NAIJOS S-ryA. : -ML) TSOAR p . 71M--'!;!.,%.p�-L- 'Jp -fir - �--- /�,� DG S`i�iDS �4 y✓DO S��RT}�1"1i✓if RA C/✓1 U \A/ALL' ���--��G�� 1,✓ktLAirBnl 7 LI Drawn #-x,-18 Y m a E E m c O a, c c Z N � a °D u cv 00 C C o6 c a, u ° _ C O 4- t; O � a a� O E ;. Q Z 4 Scale: 1/4" =1'-0" 3.0 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 2. LA18-000039 CATHERINE MEYER, 493 PARK AVENUE, VARIANCES, 6:31 P.M. — 6:35 P.M. Catherine Meyer, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to develop the vacant property and to take advantage of the Tier 3 hardcover level of 35 percent. Until recently, the property was made up of two separate PIDs. The combined property is a small lot which qualifies for buildability without area and width variances. The property owner recently combined the two PIDS into one property, which is still in process at Hennepin County. Plans have been submitted which meet all of the LR -113 district setbacks and reflect a proposed hardcover level of approximately 29 percent. In order to be able to exceed 25 percent up to the 35 percent limit, the lot area and width variances are required. Once the area and width variances are granted, any additional hardcover in the future would be limited to 35 percent. Staff finds that there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the lot area and lot width variance to develop the property. Staff recommends approval of the lot area and lot width variances. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Catherine Meyer, Applicant, stated she is here to answer questions. Meyer indicated she has lived in her home for 40 years and that she is hoping to build a smaller house next door for herself and that her daughter and her family will be moving into her current home. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. Thiesse commented the house is of a moderate size, fits the neighborhood, and that he does not have a problem with the application. Landgraver stated it is a prudent approach since the hardcover is below the allowable limit. Lemke moved, Landgraver seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000041, Catherine Meyer, 493 Park Avenue, subject to the two lots being combined. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 04/16/18 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/16/18 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 06/15/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 21 May 2018 Subject: #LA18-000041, Catherine Meyer, 493 Park Avenue, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to develop the vacant property in order to take advantage of the Tier 3 hardcover level of 35%. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background Until recently, the 493 Park Avenue was made up of two separate PIDs. The property owner recently combined the two PIDs into one property which is still in process at Hennepin County. The combined property is a small lot which qualifies for buildability without area and width variances under the Shoreland regulations. However, a qualifier for taking advantage of the Shoreland ordinance is a hardcover limitation of 25%. The owner wishes to develop the property under the Tier 3 hardcover limitation, which is consistent with the tier assigned based on distance. In order to be able to exceed 25% up to the 35% limit, the lot area and width variance is required. Plans have been submitted which meet all of the LR -16 district setbacks and reflect a proposed hardcover level of approximately 29%. Once the area and width variances are granted, any additional hardcover in the future would be limited to 35%. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 - Setbacks: LR -1B Required Proposed Front 35' 42' house 35' porch Rear 30' 36' Side Street (South) 20' 22' North Side 10' 10' FILE #LA18-000039 21 May 2018 Page 2 of 5 Section 78- 330 - Lot Area/Width: LR -1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 10,816 s.f. (0.25 acre) 100' Section 78-1403- Structural Coveraee. Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 10,816 s.f. (0.25 acre) Allowed: 2,162 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,033 s.f. (18.7%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 3 10,816 s.f. 3,785 s.f. 3,109 s.f. (35%) (28.7%) Applicable Regulations: Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Sec. 78-330 Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for application of Tier 3 hardcover results in the property's inability to conform to #3 above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to have the same type of hardcover amenities as other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties FILE #LA18-000039 21 May 2018 Page 3 of 5 also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. A single family residence is a permitted use within the LR -1B zoning district. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The residential principal structure and associated amenities are residential uses which are consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding properties for residential use. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size, which is a result of the property being platted long before local zoning codes were in effect. The property owner combined two PIDs in an attempt to make subject property more conforming; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed home will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The lot area, lot width, setback, hardcover and lot coverage standards applying to this property are similar to those of other properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 35% hardcover FILE #LA18-000039 21 May 2018 Page 4 of 5 that other developed similar -sized lots are afforded, a variance to lot area and width is required. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. In the opinion of staff, the property rights of the owner will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as the new residence would not be able to be developed, nor will it be permitted the 35% hardcover level that neighboring similar -sized lots are allowed. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The size and width of the property, as well as the corner lot configuration create practical difficulties affecting the subject property; the variances are necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided the Practical Difficulties Documentation attached as Exhibit B, and may be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the lot area and lot width variance to develop the property. Engineer Comments The City's engineer has reviewed the proposed plan and has identified no issues of concern. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? FILE #LA18-000039 21 May 2018 Page 5 of 5 Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances. This support is based in part on the supposition that the lots are combined. If Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met for the area and width variances, then a recommendation for approval would be in order. The applicant shall adhere to the required setbacks and 35% hardcover limitations with regards to any additional structures and hardcover proposed for the property. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 11 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: #LA18-000043, LDK Builders o/b/o Thomas Bergstrom, 1509 Long Lake Blvd, Variances, Resolution Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Consent Agenda City Planner Section: 1. Purpose. This application is for multiple variance requests, including side and rear yard setbacks as well as lot area and lot width. 2. 15.99 Deadline. The 60- day review period expires on July 2, 2018. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicant plans to demolish the existing home. The existing home is located within the 75 foot lakeyard setback and within the 50 foot rear yard setback. This lot is unique in for the LR -IA zoning district where the bend of the shoreline creates a curved 75 feet lakeyard setback which overlaps the 50 foot rear yard setback eliminating a conforming building envelope on the lot. They are requesting rear and side yard setback variances to allow them to be 17.9 feet from the rear (street) property line instead of the standard 50 feet and 10.3 side yard setback where a 11.6 setback is required. Lot area and lot width variances will also be needed due to the substandard area and width of the lot. The applicant is proposing to build a deck on the lake side of the property 63 feet from the OHWL. This will be within the footprint and volume of the existing home. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On May 21, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. The commission commented on the challenges of the lot and the work the builder did to try and conform to the City Code. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 7-0 on a motion approve. 5. Public Comment. No public comment was received on this application. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable. Planning staff recommends approval COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Survey and Building Plans Exhibit C. Draft Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Prepared By: LLO Application Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Proposed Plans and Elevations Submitted Hardcover Calculations Site Photos Property Owners List Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb9a CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-305 FILE NO. LA18-000043 WHEREAS, on April 18, 2018, Thomas and Kathryn Bergstrom ("Applicants"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 1509 Long Lake Boulevard and legally described as: Lot 22, and the East half of Lot 21, ALBEE' S LONG LAKE ADDITION (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow rear yard setback variance for a17.9 foot setback ; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow a side yard setback variance for a 10.3 setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow lot area variance; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow lot width variance; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves] the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA8-000043. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1A Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.37 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 116 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Rear Yard b. Side Yard c. Lot Area d. Lot Width 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The lot width and lot area variances requested are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear and side yard setback variances are in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. The lot includes challenges with topography and the curved right of way and shoreline eliminating the building envelope of the property. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the rear yard setback seems reasonable as the property is steepness and to protect the 75 foot lakeyard setback. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The location of the home with attached garage on the Property, the steepness of the lot, the curve of the shoreline, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the property create difficulties for developing the Property c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " The lot area and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will adversely impact the adjacent property owners. The neighboring parcel has a home much closer to the road than it proposed. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1A District CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The lack of a building envelope with the substandard lot, the curved shoreline and curved right-of-way along the rear property line and the steepness of the lot create a difficulties unique to the property. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." Due to the steepness of the lot the home should be set closer to the road to create a manageable access. Moving the home further from the road creates a an encroachment in the lakeyard setback and would require much more grading closer to the lake. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The substandard area and width of the Property; steepness of the lot, unique shoreline and the curved road long the rear property line create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow rear setback, side setback, lot area and lot with, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated May 2, 2018 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (June 11, 2019). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this day of 20 ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor HOUSE #1525 Rzz�--8p 0�0 L) 0 28,f 42 1e7 N=Q70 5,1 RC TRETPRE RET W DECK PROPOS D AININ� WALL (F) F) VW=978.9_ ..... W=972.5 IQ, 18096REVISED.SCJ 1 4-17-18 JADDITIONAL INFORMATION, REVISED HOUSE 4-23-18 ADDITIONAL NOTES 5-2-18 REVISED PROPOSED DRIVEWAY N V (985.?) 0 o0 MH XX 7- 0 3 ID TIS T E� 1=9,9.0 1= 1Z9997 .01 2. �(E) PROPOED" DR�VEWA 981.0 20.0 �D ROAD POP WA \�2.0 g C) OOP n' 35 PR7- 4.5 C) OPOS D-,, -, 0 '.. .5 # 15M 9 A 0 1 ...... 8 ...... 97 12.5 76 ............... 18.0 97 DECK 972.1 ............ . (B 97 dk �\\ \ \ \ ,.., FLOOR MAIN LEVEL= \ \ PROPOSED FLOOR(971.6) SILT EN ..................... SILT 17 972.9) N E,,X I IN HQ\ '" \\\\\\\\\ \ # t509 � SET LINE 'ZIX X Nx, \\",,SURVE\Y\ LINE NA 944.3 CONTOUR' LINE (O.H.W.) LAKE VA \A- Lot 22, and the East half of Lot 21, ALBEE' S LONG LAKE ADDITION IM 91\--: 0 denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, driveway, spot elevations, topography and the lakesides of the two adjoining houses thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. H 1�0 \n EXISTING 't"7 0 HOUSE " "J'JL #1505 \ L 11 \U) - --------- 'Nil PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (verify) 1) Garage = 981.0 2) Top of foundation 3) Basement = [57M I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SCALE 1 Fr=20' JOB NO. 18-096 (980.7) 0 MH CONC. DRIVE GARAGE 1�0 \n EXISTING 't"7 0 HOUSE " "J'JL #1505 \ L 11 \U) - --------- 'Nil PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (verify) 1) Garage = 981.0 2) Top of foundation 3) Basement = [57M I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SCALE 1 Fr=20' JOB NO. 18-096 NSW KE51PEN�E rQK T911 AMD K6THKTN DCKQJTKQM APR z4, 2018 REVIEW ser 1509 Long Lake E3VD, Orono, MN S I T W K E ~ V E T V I E W E; C A L E; 1/ AL50 4 5 = 1- AL50 CALLED FRONT VIEW FOR THESE PLANS M 5/4 x N � J 5/4 x 0 X 6 CONTINUOUS ?E SHOWN REVILION5 FROM: xxxx 5EE ROOF FLAN, SHEET 2, FOR ALL ROOF DITCHES 52UAKt t94TAGt 5AHMENT FIN, TOTAL 1135 MAIN FLOOR 5,E. TOTAL 1276 UPPER FLOOR 5,F, TOTAL 1712 TOTAL FIN AREA ; 4125 5.E, L I A W K E ~ V I E W 5 C A L E; 1/ 4" - 1 - 0 AL50 CALLED REAR VIEW 5 4 x 6 VNO I V=U W W U - ~ Z E m _ 1U a� Q� L V=U Cie'N L Q� L N U •• E 4- a� L Z�. W 5 cv 0 M Q w) W a� o J W L x V �U_ c� D000 oc oC 0 m 0.- M f �0, r - H W W 2 cri L•J `Q W W od O CleW X W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 L E : 21-0 11 4 " = 1 - Q '' 8 7 9 7 �m MEN v MEN m MEMO MEN m mma"m MEN m v MEN m monv MEN"" VN K O I W G M Z T S 1 D E 5 C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 - Q '' A5 VIEWED FROM THE STREET 8 7 9 7 �m MEN v MEN m MEMO MEN m mma"m MEN m v MEN m monv MEN"" VN L O W W U - ~ Z E m _ 1U \ Q� L V=0 O Cie •• N } Q� L N O V •• ZQ E 4- \ L. H Z�. O W 5 cv cle 0 M <� Q w) W a� o J W L x V �U- c� Dcoo oc oC 0 m 0.- M ©M 2 D J O �o ZQ N L \ H Q O LLJ NJ J YJ 2 <� V1 N o 3-6/4-0 FX 3-6/4-0 FX 2-2x10 1 2 2-2x10 4 5 1'-6" 7 r CANT 6 Z U 7 7 G O Q p of LU w r� a0 = 'L W M W " � W �. >� o W Q = U CA . LU L 0 X 3-6/4-0 FX 2-2x10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 181-011 AT SHEATHING 3 UNITS: 4-6/6-0 FX 2-9.511 LVL 2-9.5" LVL 3-9.5" LVL 1 II 1 II I II I II -0 4•-1 1/2 �jI�4 -9 '-----------r'r---------------------`-- 9" RAISED, BEAMED CEILING DE51bN BY BUILDER ; r -----J L ------------------J L- _--- ----------- -----------' Ca w� GREAT ROOKI FIREPLACE Luq) tS TV, DE51GN �� WOOD BY BUILDER \� N ----------------- - ---- `-----------------� r-------------------, r---�------------ .-------------------I-'L " '-------"-------J-"'-----'---'---'--- 4'-4" CANTED FLUSH ..................3ir...::.........: BEAM 1-7 2 UNITS: 4-6/6-0 FX 2-9.5 L5 ±3'-8 11/16' BEAM MEETS WALL N 2 UNITS 12" AT LOWER LANDING: 3-0/5-0 FX 10'-0" AT SHEATHING 55'-0" 12'-6" AT SHEATHING 10'-611 61-011 AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING 14 X 12-6 DECK 8x8 PATIO DOOR 3-9.5" LVL 0 ------------------- 211 + 3 UNITS: 0 4-0/6-0 FX w j 2- 9.5" L V L _' 0 5" RAISED CLQ%yO cq D.tNING R0O.M(: °� cq s ' p WOOD N C96 Go (S)LU JU� U o q) O m�.: Z0 3'-9" �LL ..: o .................. . .................... o I' 1:::-:. ---- --8x4-6 J N .� FLUSH BEAM ISLAND_ 1:::: iL OPEN TO �(ON A 45° ANGLE) 2-4 ABOVE FLU5H BEAM _ KITCHEN 31-6 1/211 WOOD RECESS III \ - FRIDGE DN OVENS COOKTOP/HOOD \ --- - 0 -- -- U 0 0: ::.:::::L ---- LU H EA II J I .0::.::: ......... :::::.. RAILINGS a o r13EC,NH I a v HgOK5 III i 5-2x6 POST FOYER III N 4'-6" I 4'-611 AT SHEATHING „ t/4" F � � 6&PA 6X6 TREATED P05T i— 5/4 X 12 AZEK MATERIAL MITER CORNERS Stoop Column MAIN FLOOR PLAN * 1278 S.F. SCALE: 1/4" = 11-011 q I 07 d\ o 0 03 � N �LL N O I N 61-011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I 8-011 I 13-611 I AT SHEATHING I I I I I 9-0x8-0 O.H. DR. i 2-12" LVL -----------, I ------------------------- GENERAL NOTE!5: ----------------------------------------------------------- TH15 FLOOR HAS A 9'-1 1/8" WALL HEIGHT, INCLUDING GARAGE, WINDOW BRAND TO BE PELLA (51ZE5 NOTED IN FEET/INCHES) ALL WINDOW HEADS TO BE 95 1/8" A.F.F. UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL INTERIOR DOORS AT CORNERS TO BE 4 1/2" (3 STUDS) MIN FROM CORNER UNLE55 OTHER WISE INDICATED BY NOTE OR 51TE CONDITION. ALL INTERIOR DOORS TO BE 8' HIGH EXCEPT A5 NOTED. ALL DIMEN5ION5 TAKEN FROM EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE FACE OF SHEATHING. BRACE WALL FRAMING AS PER BRACE WALL PLAN (BY OTHERS) ALL EXPOSED WOOD TO BE TREATED OR EQUAL, VERIFY LOCATION OF EXTERIOR SPIGOTS. ALL ROOF TRU55E5, FLOOR TRU55E5, GIRDER TRU55E5, STRUCTURAL RIMS, 13EAM5 AND HEADERS TO BE DESIGNED BY SUPPLIERS' ENGINEERS. ALL CABINETRY DETAILS AS PER BUILDER. 61-611 I 51-611 41-611 31-611 AT SH ATHING 3-6/4-6 FX 2-2x10 X11 6., OFFICE I\ WOOD 4 ��6% DESK 6'-8 3/4" 5'-6 1 16" L 0 W In V - ~ Z E i ��m11 V L 0 G � Z� � 1,III LU I , C4 � M W " � W W o CA . LU L 0 X 0 4► 0 LL 0 I..r� 00 0 0 m 01, M a 4'-6" I 4'-611 AT SHEATHING „ t/4" F � � 6&PA 6X6 TREATED P05T i— 5/4 X 12 AZEK MATERIAL MITER CORNERS Stoop Column MAIN FLOOR PLAN * 1278 S.F. SCALE: 1/4" = 11-011 q I 07 d\ o 0 03 � N �LL N O I N 61-011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I 8-011 I 13-611 I AT SHEATHING I I I I I 9-0x8-0 O.H. DR. i 2-12" LVL -----------, I ------------------------- GENERAL NOTE!5: ----------------------------------------------------------- TH15 FLOOR HAS A 9'-1 1/8" WALL HEIGHT, INCLUDING GARAGE, WINDOW BRAND TO BE PELLA (51ZE5 NOTED IN FEET/INCHES) ALL WINDOW HEADS TO BE 95 1/8" A.F.F. UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL INTERIOR DOORS AT CORNERS TO BE 4 1/2" (3 STUDS) MIN FROM CORNER UNLE55 OTHER WISE INDICATED BY NOTE OR 51TE CONDITION. ALL INTERIOR DOORS TO BE 8' HIGH EXCEPT A5 NOTED. ALL DIMEN5ION5 TAKEN FROM EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE FACE OF SHEATHING. BRACE WALL FRAMING AS PER BRACE WALL PLAN (BY OTHERS) ALL EXPOSED WOOD TO BE TREATED OR EQUAL, VERIFY LOCATION OF EXTERIOR SPIGOTS. ALL ROOF TRU55E5, FLOOR TRU55E5, GIRDER TRU55E5, STRUCTURAL RIMS, 13EAM5 AND HEADERS TO BE DESIGNED BY SUPPLIERS' ENGINEERS. ALL CABINETRY DETAILS AS PER BUILDER. 61-611 I 51-611 41-611 31-611 AT SH ATHING 3-6/4-6 FX 2-2x10 X11 6., OFFICE I\ WOOD 4 ��6% DESK 6'-8 3/4" 5'-6 1 16" 2-6/5-0 C5MT 2-2x10 :::60B IES Mud Room COATS 3 -0 20 MIN DRWIRE R$5 2'-2x10 , -- - -- -----J 4-0/2-0 FX D WOO5TEP5 HD = OH DR. 71_Q11 0 LULU CO J 17'-6" � o a-- L � N LINE OF 2ND FLOOR •------ --------------------------------------------------------- POSTING POSTING- ; _ ROOF GIRDER _ FX 3 CAP GARAGE HDO/2OH DR. FIN15H GARAGE INTERIOR: 5/811 TYPE 1X1 CEILING 5HEETROCK WALLS: 1/2" WALL SHEETROCK, R-21 FIBERGLA55 INSULATION IN _2x6 GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS, W/ r 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND R-50 BLOWN I CEILING INSULATION (R-30 WHERE I I 2ND FLOOR ABOVE) I FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE FLOOR SLOPED TOWARDS O.H. DOORS WHERE PRECAST: OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER PRECAST PLANKS, DETAILS I BY SUPPLIER I I I I I 16-0x8-0 O.H. DR, 2-12" LVL EDE 101-011 I 101-011 1. 121-011 I 201-01' _ AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING N I A N I I 0 _z Q w H N l� z o LU Q 4, 13 8 a VN L 0 W In V - ~ Z E i ��m11 V L 0 G � Z� � 1,III LU I , C4 2-6/5-0 C5MT 2-2x10 :::60B IES Mud Room COATS 3 -0 20 MIN DRWIRE R$5 2'-2x10 , -- - -- -----J 4-0/2-0 FX D WOO5TEP5 HD = OH DR. 71_Q11 0 LULU CO J 17'-6" � o a-- L � N LINE OF 2ND FLOOR •------ --------------------------------------------------------- POSTING POSTING- ; _ ROOF GIRDER _ FX 3 CAP GARAGE HDO/2OH DR. FIN15H GARAGE INTERIOR: 5/811 TYPE 1X1 CEILING 5HEETROCK WALLS: 1/2" WALL SHEETROCK, R-21 FIBERGLA55 INSULATION IN _2x6 GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS, W/ r 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND R-50 BLOWN I CEILING INSULATION (R-30 WHERE I I 2ND FLOOR ABOVE) I FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE FLOOR SLOPED TOWARDS O.H. DOORS WHERE PRECAST: OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER PRECAST PLANKS, DETAILS I BY SUPPLIER I I I I I 16-0x8-0 O.H. DR, 2-12" LVL EDE 101-011 I 101-011 1. 121-011 I 201-01' _ AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING N I A N I I 0 _z Q w H N l� z o LU Q 4, 13 8 a VN L 0 W In V - ~ Z E } ��m11 V Q� L V=° O fie •• N } Q� L N O V •• Z 2N E } L 0 � � Z� S0 LU I , C4 � M W " � W W o CA en o LU L 0 X V 4► 0 LL 0 I..r� 00 0 0 m 01, M a L O m J U. W W J Q ao O �O Z 2N � � O W W W " � W CA en o 11-011 11 -^II — — — — • ► • - / -•- N HED FLO( T$6 0.5 )R, WITH 3, GLUE 4 =LOOK JO HED FLO( T$6 0.5 )R, WITH 3, GLUE 4 =LOOK JO n 25+ YEAR FIBERGLASS ROOF SHINGLES FASTEN TO ROOF A5 PER CODES, OVER 15# FELT UNDERLAYMENT WITH ICE $ WATERSHIELD FROM OVERHANG UP ROOF 24" BEYOND FACE OF EXT, STUDS, WITH STYLE "D" DRIP EDGE WITH AIR CHUTES EACH TRU55 BAY. INSTALL WINDWASH, WITH R-50 BLOWN ATTIC INSULATION OVER 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND 5/811 CEILING SHEETROCK 15/3211 0.5.8. ROOF SHEATHING WITH STEEL ROOF CLIPS ON MANUF. ROOF TRUSSES, WITH TIE DOWNS A5 PER CODES ALUM. 50FFIT $ FASCIA 2X6 SUB FASCIA WITH GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS —51DING ON WALLS (VERIFY BRAND 4: STYLE) OVER TYVEK TYPE HOUSE WRAP OVER 15/3211 O.53 WALL SHEATHING R-20 BATTS WITH 4 MIL POLY V,B, UNDER 1/211 SHEETROCK INTERIOR SURFACE. ALL BOTTOM PLATES, DOUBLE 5TUD5 $ OPEN 5EAM5 TO BE CAULKED. 11 THICK CLOSED ELL SPRAY FOAM JSULATION AT RU55 CAVITY RIM YPICAL 311 THICK CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AT TRU55 CAVITY RIM TYPICAL 2X8 TREATED SILL PLATE OVER 51LL SEALER ANCHORED TO FOUNDATION WITH 1/211 A. BOLTS EMBEDDED 711 MIN. INTO FOUNDATION. FINISHED GRADE (FIELD DETERMINE) R-5 THERMAX "'c --COLOR EMBEDDED ACRYLIC INSULATION FOUNDATION PROTECTION WRAP AROUND THE COMPLETE PERIMETER WHERE RIGID 15 EXPOSED TO EXTERIOR INCL, THEATER, MECH RM, 1/2 BATH, STAIRWAY EXERCISE AND 3/4 BATH ATERPROOF MASTIC INF. CONC, 6 MIL POLY MIL POLY DN 611 SAND FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION SASE TO FOOTING �R-10 CERT15TUD FOUNDATION INSULATION CONC. FTGS, TYPICAL L O W � 5EE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR N 7 L E 0) DF8x20 EXCEPTION!5 Q L L. FORM -A -DRAIN A 7ENLARGED LLJ cv ALL DETAIL M W i SCALE: 111 = 11-011 N o o J VN L O W � U - N 7 L E 0) _ I0 Q Q� L V=0 W,^ Cie .. N } Q� L N W,^ V .. ZQ V E .X. 4- Q L L. H Z�. LLJ cv C J YJ M W i W) W N o o J W L V �u- c� D o /�/ Iii co 0 i O m 0.- M S01 A "N•%k�''% W W O .1Y W ' Vl S LAMO \\ ,I,IIII I I\\\\\ Q W a D J L m ►1. W,^ �o ZQ V N W L Q H ac W LL.= J YJ 2 W D J L m ►1. o �o ZQ N L � H ac W NJ J YJ 2 <� V1 N o CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR THOMAS BERGSTROM IN LOTS 21 & 22, ALBEE'S LONG LAKE ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA CID LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Lot 22, and the East half of Lot 21, ALBEE' S LONG LAKE ADDITION /X denotes iron marker found (908.3) denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum (985 2) 0 917-- denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum MH .0 V % 0 Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 0 This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, driveway, spot elevations, topography and the lakesides of the two adjoining houses thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. q% NC� P ED SILT SED6� 6 .1W=q9.0 '3 .01 W=97 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS oil (verify) EXISTING 0\ 1) Garage HOUSE #1525 (E) 2) Top of foundation PROPIOED T 79 5� DR�VEWA 3) Basement e� W: W 4:5 981.0 � DECK PROPOS D &L.Ackr RETAININT ROAD, AY WALL (F) W=9972.78.9. =. \�2.0 W g 10 C) 3\5 OOP PROPOSED-, Ln tm .5 H �E\ 0 N 4.5 # 15M 9 1 Cq 1 ..... ......... (A) 97 .............. (980.7) c6 76 0 12.5. MH Z5............... L6 18.0 97 DECK 972.1 ........... ®\ 97 FLOOR POS LEVEL= \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\SILT ENGEM PR D L (971.6) 972.9} ..... .............. EXI IN CONC. DRIVE SE # 509 '�q, SETgAC� LINE GARAGE \t \ \ \ gym` \ \�\ \\ \ \ X X S� o URVEY LINE N EXISTING HOUSE #1505 944.3 CONTOUR'NOTE: THE LAKESIDE DOES NOT LINE (O.H.W.) LONQUALIFY AS A BLUFF SINCE THE U AREA ONLY RISES 22 FROM THE 948 CONTOUR TO THE 970 CONTOUR LAKE 18096REVISED.SCJ 1 4-17-18 JADDITIONAL INFORMATION, REVISED HOUSE 1 4-23-18 JADDITIONAL NOTES 1 5-2-18 IREVISED PROPOSED DRIVEWAY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, '-,and that I am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ,.Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota Licenseumber 12755_ SCALE 1 Fr=20' NSW KE51PEN�E rQK T911 AMD K6THKTN DCKQJTKQM APR z4, 2018 REVIEW ser 1509 Long Lake E3VD, Orono, MN S I T W K E ~ V E T V I E W E; C A L E; 1/ AL50 4 5 = 1- AL50 CALLED FRONT VIEW FOR THESE PLANS M 5/4 x N � J 5/4 x 0 X 6 CONTINUOUS ?E SHOWN REVILION5 FROM: xxxx 5EE ROOF FLAN, SHEET 2, FOR ALL ROOF DITCHES 52UAKt t94TAGt 5AHMENT FIN, TOTAL 1135 MAIN FLOOR 5,E. TOTAL 1276 UPPER FLOOR 5,F, TOTAL 1712 TOTAL FIN AREA ; 4125 5.E, L I A W K E ~ V I E W 5 C A L E; 1/ 4" - 1 - 0 AL50 CALLED REAR VIEW 5 4 x 6 VNO I V=U W W U - ~ Z E m _ 1U a� Q� L V=U Cie'N L Q� L N U •• E 4- a� L Z�. W 5 cv 0 M Q w) W a� o J W L x V �U_ c� D000 oc oC 0 m 0.- M f �0, r - H W W 2 cri L•J `Q W W od O CleW X W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 L E : 21-0 11 4 " = 1 - Q '' 8 7 9 7 �m MEN v MEN m MEMO MEN m mma"m MEN m v MEN m monv MEN"" VN K O I W G M Z T S 1 D E 5 C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 - Q '' A5 VIEWED FROM THE STREET 8 7 9 7 �m MEN v MEN m MEMO MEN m mma"m MEN m v MEN m monv MEN"" VN L O W W U - ~ Z E m _ 1U \ Q� L V=0 O Cie •• N } Q� L N O V •• ZQ E 4- \ L. H Z�. O W 5 cv cle 0 M <� Q w) W a� o J W L x V �U- c� Dcoo oc oC 0 m 0.- M ©M 2 D J O �o ZQ N L \ H Q O LLJ NJ J YJ 2 <� V1 N o 3-6/4-0 FX 3-6/4-0 FX 2-2x10 1 2 2-2x10 4 5 1'-6" 7 r CANT 6 Z U 7 7 G O Q p of LU w r� a0 = 'L W M W " � W �. >� o W Q = U CA . LU L 0 X 3-6/4-0 FX 2-2x10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 181-011 AT SHEATHING 3 UNITS: 4-6/6-0 FX 2-9.511 LVL 2-9.5" LVL 3-9.5" LVL 1 II 1 II I II I II -0 4•-1 1/2 �jI�4 -9 '-----------r'r---------------------`-- 9" RAISED, BEAMED CEILING DE51bN BY BUILDER ; r -----J L ------------------J L- _--- ----------- -----------' Ca w� GREAT ROOKI FIREPLACE Luq) tS TV, DE51GN �� WOOD BY BUILDER \� N ----------------- - ---- `-----------------� r-------------------, r---�------------ .-------------------I-'L " '-------"-------J-"'-----'---'---'--- 4'-4" CANTED FLUSH ..................3ir...::.........: BEAM 1-7 2 UNITS: 4-6/6-0 FX 2-9.5 L5 ±3'-8 11/16' BEAM MEETS WALL N 2 UNITS 12" AT LOWER LANDING: 3-0/5-0 FX 10'-0" AT SHEATHING 55'-0" 12'-6" AT SHEATHING 10'-611 61-011 AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING 14 X 12-6 DECK 8x8 PATIO DOOR 3-9.5" LVL 0 ------------------- 211 + 3 UNITS: 0 4-0/6-0 FX w j 2- 9.5" L V L _' 0 5" RAISED CLQ%yO cq D.tNING R0O.M(: °� cq s ' p WOOD N C96 Go (S)LU JU� U o q) O m�.: Z0 3'-9" �LL ..: o .................. . .................... o I' 1:::-:. ---- --8x4-6 J N .� FLUSH BEAM ISLAND_ 1:::: iL OPEN TO �(ON A 45° ANGLE) 2-4 ABOVE FLU5H BEAM _ KITCHEN 31-6 1/211 WOOD RECESS III \ - FRIDGE DN OVENS COOKTOP/HOOD \ --- - 0 -- -- U 0 0: ::.:::::L ---- LU H EA II J I .0::.::: ......... :::::.. RAILINGS a o r13EC,NH I a v HgOK5 III i 5-2x6 POST FOYER III N 4'-6" I 4'-611 AT SHEATHING „ t/4" F � � 6&PA 6X6 TREATED P05T i— 5/4 X 12 AZEK MATERIAL MITER CORNERS Stoop Column MAIN FLOOR PLAN * 1278 S.F. SCALE: 1/4" = 11-011 q I 07 d\ o 0 03 � N �LL N O I N 61-011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I 8-011 I 13-611 I AT SHEATHING I I I I I 9-0x8-0 O.H. DR. i 2-12" LVL -----------, I ------------------------- GENERAL NOTE!5: ----------------------------------------------------------- TH15 FLOOR HAS A 9'-1 1/8" WALL HEIGHT, INCLUDING GARAGE, WINDOW BRAND TO BE PELLA (51ZE5 NOTED IN FEET/INCHES) ALL WINDOW HEADS TO BE 95 1/8" A.F.F. UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL INTERIOR DOORS AT CORNERS TO BE 4 1/2" (3 STUDS) MIN FROM CORNER UNLE55 OTHER WISE INDICATED BY NOTE OR 51TE CONDITION. ALL INTERIOR DOORS TO BE 8' HIGH EXCEPT A5 NOTED. ALL DIMEN5ION5 TAKEN FROM EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE FACE OF SHEATHING. BRACE WALL FRAMING AS PER BRACE WALL PLAN (BY OTHERS) ALL EXPOSED WOOD TO BE TREATED OR EQUAL, VERIFY LOCATION OF EXTERIOR SPIGOTS. ALL ROOF TRU55E5, FLOOR TRU55E5, GIRDER TRU55E5, STRUCTURAL RIMS, 13EAM5 AND HEADERS TO BE DESIGNED BY SUPPLIERS' ENGINEERS. ALL CABINETRY DETAILS AS PER BUILDER. 61-611 I 51-611 41-611 31-611 AT SH ATHING 3-6/4-6 FX 2-2x10 X11 6., OFFICE I\ WOOD 4 ��6% DESK 6'-8 3/4" 5'-6 1 16" L 0 W In V - ~ Z E i ��m11 V L 0 G � Z� � 1,III LU I , C4 � M W " � W W o CA . LU L 0 X 0 4► 0 LL 0 I..r� 00 0 0 m 01, M a 4'-6" I 4'-611 AT SHEATHING „ t/4" F � � 6&PA 6X6 TREATED P05T i— 5/4 X 12 AZEK MATERIAL MITER CORNERS Stoop Column MAIN FLOOR PLAN * 1278 S.F. SCALE: 1/4" = 11-011 q I 07 d\ o 0 03 � N �LL N O I N 61-011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I 8-011 I 13-611 I AT SHEATHING I I I I I 9-0x8-0 O.H. DR. i 2-12" LVL -----------, I ------------------------- GENERAL NOTE!5: ----------------------------------------------------------- TH15 FLOOR HAS A 9'-1 1/8" WALL HEIGHT, INCLUDING GARAGE, WINDOW BRAND TO BE PELLA (51ZE5 NOTED IN FEET/INCHES) ALL WINDOW HEADS TO BE 95 1/8" A.F.F. UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL INTERIOR DOORS AT CORNERS TO BE 4 1/2" (3 STUDS) MIN FROM CORNER UNLE55 OTHER WISE INDICATED BY NOTE OR 51TE CONDITION. ALL INTERIOR DOORS TO BE 8' HIGH EXCEPT A5 NOTED. ALL DIMEN5ION5 TAKEN FROM EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE FACE OF SHEATHING. BRACE WALL FRAMING AS PER BRACE WALL PLAN (BY OTHERS) ALL EXPOSED WOOD TO BE TREATED OR EQUAL, VERIFY LOCATION OF EXTERIOR SPIGOTS. ALL ROOF TRU55E5, FLOOR TRU55E5, GIRDER TRU55E5, STRUCTURAL RIMS, 13EAM5 AND HEADERS TO BE DESIGNED BY SUPPLIERS' ENGINEERS. ALL CABINETRY DETAILS AS PER BUILDER. 61-611 I 51-611 41-611 31-611 AT SH ATHING 3-6/4-6 FX 2-2x10 X11 6., OFFICE I\ WOOD 4 ��6% DESK 6'-8 3/4" 5'-6 1 16" 2-6/5-0 C5MT 2-2x10 :::60B IES Mud Room COATS 3 -0 20 MIN DRWIRE R$5 2'-2x10 , -- - -- -----J 4-0/2-0 FX D WOO5TEP5 HD = OH DR. 71_Q11 0 LULU CO J 17'-6" � o a-- L � N LINE OF 2ND FLOOR •------ --------------------------------------------------------- POSTING POSTING- ; _ ROOF GIRDER _ FX 3 CAP GARAGE HDO/2OH DR. FIN15H GARAGE INTERIOR: 5/811 TYPE 1X1 CEILING 5HEETROCK WALLS: 1/2" WALL SHEETROCK, R-21 FIBERGLA55 INSULATION IN _2x6 GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS, W/ r 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND R-50 BLOWN I CEILING INSULATION (R-30 WHERE I I 2ND FLOOR ABOVE) I FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE FLOOR SLOPED TOWARDS O.H. DOORS WHERE PRECAST: OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER PRECAST PLANKS, DETAILS I BY SUPPLIER I I I I I 16-0x8-0 O.H. DR, 2-12" LVL EDE 101-011 I 101-011 1. 121-011 I 201-01' _ AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING N I A N I I 0 _z Q w H N l� z o LU Q 4, 13 8 a VN L 0 W In V - ~ Z E i ��m11 V L 0 G � Z� � 1,III LU I , C4 2-6/5-0 C5MT 2-2x10 :::60B IES Mud Room COATS 3 -0 20 MIN DRWIRE R$5 2'-2x10 , -- - -- -----J 4-0/2-0 FX D WOO5TEP5 HD = OH DR. 71_Q11 0 LULU CO J 17'-6" � o a-- L � N LINE OF 2ND FLOOR •------ --------------------------------------------------------- POSTING POSTING- ; _ ROOF GIRDER _ FX 3 CAP GARAGE HDO/2OH DR. FIN15H GARAGE INTERIOR: 5/811 TYPE 1X1 CEILING 5HEETROCK WALLS: 1/2" WALL SHEETROCK, R-21 FIBERGLA55 INSULATION IN _2x6 GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS, W/ r 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND R-50 BLOWN I CEILING INSULATION (R-30 WHERE I I 2ND FLOOR ABOVE) I FLOOR: POURED CONCRETE FLOOR SLOPED TOWARDS O.H. DOORS WHERE PRECAST: OVER RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER PRECAST PLANKS, DETAILS I BY SUPPLIER I I I I I 16-0x8-0 O.H. DR, 2-12" LVL EDE 101-011 I 101-011 1. 121-011 I 201-01' _ AT SHEATHING AT SHEATHING N I A N I I 0 _z Q w H N l� z o LU Q 4, 13 8 a VN L 0 W In V - ~ Z E } ��m11 V Q� L V=° O fie •• N } Q� L N O V •• Z 2N E } L 0 � � Z� S0 LU I , C4 � M W " � W W o CA en o LU L 0 X V 4► 0 LL 0 I..r� 00 0 0 m 01, M a L O m J U. W W J Q ao O �O Z 2N � � O W W W " � W CA en o 11-011 11 -^II — — — — • ► • - / -•- N HED FLO( T$6 0.5 )R, WITH 3, GLUE 4 =LOOK JO HED FLO( T$6 0.5 )R, WITH 3, GLUE 4 =LOOK JO n 25+ YEAR FIBERGLASS ROOF SHINGLES FASTEN TO ROOF A5 PER CODES, OVER 15# FELT UNDERLAYMENT WITH ICE $ WATERSHIELD FROM OVERHANG UP ROOF 24" BEYOND FACE OF EXT, STUDS, WITH STYLE "D" DRIP EDGE WITH AIR CHUTES EACH TRU55 BAY. INSTALL WINDWASH, WITH R-50 BLOWN ATTIC INSULATION OVER 4 MIL POLY V.B. AND 5/811 CEILING SHEETROCK 15/3211 0.5.8. ROOF SHEATHING WITH STEEL ROOF CLIPS ON MANUF. ROOF TRUSSES, WITH TIE DOWNS A5 PER CODES ALUM. 50FFIT $ FASCIA 2X6 SUB FASCIA WITH GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS —51DING ON WALLS (VERIFY BRAND 4: STYLE) OVER TYVEK TYPE HOUSE WRAP OVER 15/3211 O.53 WALL SHEATHING R-20 BATTS WITH 4 MIL POLY V,B, UNDER 1/211 SHEETROCK INTERIOR SURFACE. ALL BOTTOM PLATES, DOUBLE 5TUD5 $ OPEN 5EAM5 TO BE CAULKED. 11 THICK CLOSED ELL SPRAY FOAM JSULATION AT RU55 CAVITY RIM YPICAL 311 THICK CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AT TRU55 CAVITY RIM TYPICAL 2X8 TREATED SILL PLATE OVER 51LL SEALER ANCHORED TO FOUNDATION WITH 1/211 A. BOLTS EMBEDDED 711 MIN. INTO FOUNDATION. FINISHED GRADE (FIELD DETERMINE) R-5 THERMAX "'c --COLOR EMBEDDED ACRYLIC INSULATION FOUNDATION PROTECTION WRAP AROUND THE COMPLETE PERIMETER WHERE RIGID 15 EXPOSED TO EXTERIOR INCL, THEATER, MECH RM, 1/2 BATH, STAIRWAY EXERCISE AND 3/4 BATH ATERPROOF MASTIC INF. CONC, 6 MIL POLY MIL POLY DN 611 SAND FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION SASE TO FOOTING �R-10 CERT15TUD FOUNDATION INSULATION CONC. FTGS, TYPICAL L O W � 5EE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR N 7 L E 0) DF8x20 EXCEPTION!5 Q L L. FORM -A -DRAIN A 7ENLARGED LLJ cv ALL DETAIL M W i SCALE: 111 = 11-011 N o o J VN L O W � U - N 7 L E 0) _ I0 Q Q� L V=0 W,^ Cie .. N } Q� L N W,^ V .. ZQ V E .X. 4- Q L L. H Z�. LLJ cv C J YJ M W i W) W N o o J W L V �u- c� D o /�/ Iii co 0 i O m 0.- M S01 A "N•%k�''% W W O .1Y W ' Vl S LAMO \\ ,I,IIII I I\\\\\ Q W a D J L m ►1. W,^ �o ZQ V N W L Q H ac W LL.= J YJ 2 W D J L m ►1. o �o ZQ N L � H ac W NJ J YJ 2 <� V1 N o MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council LA18-000043 Exhibit C 4. LA18-000043 LDK HOMES, 1509 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, VARIANCES, 6:58 P.M. — 7:07 P.M. Katie Bergstrom, Applicant, and Scott Hockentire, LDK Homes, were present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a side yard variance, a rear yard variance, lot area and lot width variances in order to build a new home on the property. The applicant plans to demolish the existing home. The existing home is located within the 75 -foot lake yard setback and within the 50 -foot rear yard setback. The new home will be located 17.9 feet from the rear property line and 10.3 feet from the west property line. The lot is unique for the LR-lA zoning district in that the bend of the shoreline creates a curved 75 -foot lake yard setback which overlaps the 50 -foot rear yard setback, thus eliminating a conforming building envelope on the lot. As a result, lot area and lot width variances are required. A rear setback variance is also requested. The applicant is proposing to build a deck on the lake side of the property 63 feet from the ordinary high water level and will be within the proposed footprint of the home. No public comments have been received to date. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, width and setbacks. Staff has done a preliminary review of the height with the submitted documents. The proposed house looks to meet the 30 -foot height requirements with the draft plans submitted. The applicant is not requesting any variances pertaining to height and the plans show they can meet this requirement. Also, the applicant is not proposing to add any stairs for lake access. In addition, the lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot, the curved road, and the shoreline eliminating a building envelope. The Planning Commission should discuss the issues set forth in Staff report. Planning Staff recommends approval. 4. LA18-000043 LDK HOMES, 1509 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, VARIANCES, 6:58 P.M. — 7:07 P.M. — Continued The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Scott Hockentire stated they would be able to answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. Rachel Carpenter, 1540 Long Lake Boulevard, stated she would like to see the plans at some point. Carpenter asked whether the new roofline would be about the same height as the current home. Oakden stated she is unsure how the new roofline compares to the existing one but that the applicants are proposing to construct the house to meet the 30 -foot requirement and are not requesting a variance to the height at this time. Carpenter asked if it will be a spec house. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Bergstrom indicated it will not be. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Thiesse asked what the side yard setback is for the property at 1525. Oakden indicated that lot is a little more narrow, and due to its substandard width, they are allowed to have a 10 -foot setback. Oakden stated this lot was measured at 116 feet, which means it would have an 11.6 foot setback. Seals noted there is a comment in Staff's report that the applicant will need to address how water will be managed. Seals asked whether that has been addressed yet. Oakden stated that is generally a standard comment from the City Engineer and a detailed review of the grading plan is typically done at the building permit review. Thiesse stated it appears the whole lot grades to the neighbor's lot, which is allowed. Thiesse noted the plan does have some arrows depicting how they are trying to keep some of the water on the subject lot but that is something that will have to be dealt with. Landgraver stated normally he would be concerned about the deck but that it is staying within the current footprint. Thiesse noted the house is also being pulled back from the lake. Lemke moved, Libby seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000043, 1509 Long Lake Boulevard, granting of rear and side yard setback variances and lot area and lot width variances subject to Staffs comments. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Date Application Received: April 18, 2018 Date Application Considered as Complete: May 3, 2018 60 -Day Review Period Expires: July 2, 2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: May 21, 2018 Subject: #LA18-000043, LDK Builders o/b/o Thomas Bergstrom, 1509 Long Lake Blvd, Variances, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear and side yard setback, lot area and lot width variances in order to build a new home that will be located 17.9 feet from the rear property line and 10.3 feet from the west property line. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant plans to demolish the existing home. The existing home is located within the 75 foot lakeyard setback and within the 50 foot rear yard setback. The proposed new home will conform to the 75 foot lakeyard, average lake setbacks, and permissions afforded to non- conforming structures. Due to contours and steepness of the lot, they are requesting a rear and side yard setback variances to allow them to be 17.9 feet from the rear (street) property line instead of the standard 50 feet and 10.3 side yard setback where a 11.6 setback is required. This lot is unique in for the LR -1A zoning district where the bend of the shoreline creates a curved 75 feet lakeyard setback which overlaps the 50 foot rear yard setback eliminating a conforming building envelope on the lot. A rear setback variance is requested, therefore lot area and lot width variances will also be needed due to the substandard area and width of the lot. The applicant is proposing to build a deck on the lake side of the property 63 feet from the OHWL. This will be within the footprint and volume of the existing home. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305- Setbacks: DISTRICT LR -1A Required Existing Proposed Rear 50' 27' 17.9' Side (West) 11.6' 34' 10.3' Side (East) 11.6' 13' 18.8' Lakeshore 75' 54' 75' Home 63' Deck Average Lakeshore Not Met This is met. Section 305 - Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR -1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' FILE # LA18-000043 May 21, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Actual I 16,240s.f. (0.37 acre) 1 116' @ 75' 130' @ OHWL Section 78-1403- Structural Cover Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 16,240s.f. (0.37 acre) Allowed: 3,248 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2074 s.f. (12.7%) Section 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Proposed Overlay District Existing Hardcover Zone Hardcover Hardcover Tier Roughly 4,060 s.f. 1,524 s.f. 3,054 s.f. Tier 1 16,240s.f 500 s.f. (25 ) 0 (9.38/) w/in 75' o (18.8 /) Applicable Regulations: Rear Setback Variance (78-305) There is a 50 foot rear setback required for this lot. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home 17.9 feet from the rear yard lot line. Side Setback Variance (78-305 There is a 11.6 foot side setback required for this lot due to the substandard width of the lot at the 75 foot setback. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home 10.3 feet from the west side yard lot line. Lot Width Variance (Section 78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's need for a side rear setback variance results in the property's inability to conform to #1 above. Therefore, a lot width and area variance is also required in order to develop the property. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and FILE # LA18-000043 May 21, 2018 Page 3 of 5 anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances requested are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The rear and side yard setback variances are in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. The lot includes challenges with topography and the curved right of way and shoreline eliminating the building envelope of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the rear yard setback seems reasonable as the property is steepness and to protect the 75 foot lakeyard setback. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The location of the home with attached garage on the Property, the steepness of the lot, the curve of the shoreline, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the property create difficulties for developing the Property and C. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lot area and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will adversely impact the adjacent property owners. The neighboring parcel has a home much closer to the road than it proposed. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. FILE # LA18-000043 May 21, 2018 Page 4 of 5 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR -1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The lack of a building envelope with the substandard lot, the curved shoreline and curved right-of-way along the rear property line and the steepness of the lot create a difficulties unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Due to the steepness of the lot the home should be set closer to the road to create a manageable access. Moving the home further from the road creates a an encroachment in the lakeyard setback and would require much more grading closer to the lake. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The substandard area and width of the Property; steepness of the lot, unique shoreline and the curved road long the rear property line create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owner. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, width and setbacks. Staff has done a preliminary review of the height with the submitted document. The proposed house looks to meet the 30 foot height requirements with the draft plans submitted. The applicant is not requesting any variances pertaining to height and shows they can meet this requirement. Also, the applicant is not proposing to add any stairs for lake access. Staff asked for clarification with the applicant and they have noted they are not proposing any lake access. The lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot, the curved road, and shoreline eliminates a building envelope. Engineer Comments The applicant will need to address how water will be managed so it will not direct water to any FILE # LA18-000043 May 21, 2018 Page 5 of 5 neighboring properties. This can be addressed in the grading plan. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Commissioners should review the proposed setback variances and may wish to ask the applicant to speak to the practical difficulties on the lot. 2. Given the analysis above, the commission could question the development of a smaller home, better meeting the setback requirements. 3. Commissioners may want ask the applicant about lake access or any future plans to add lake access because of the steepness of the lot. 4. Commission may wish to speak to the applicant about the proposed deck in the 75 foot lakeyard, within the area presently occupied by the home. 5. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 6. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable. Planning staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Property Owners List AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 12 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: Hennepin County Sheriff Office Activity Report 2017 Presenter: Sheriff Stanek Purpose. Sheriff Stanek will be presenting this item. Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Agenda Section: Presentation Approved By: -T)2 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 13 Date: June 1 l , 2018 Item Description: Annual Public Hearing for MS4 Storm Water Permit Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E. Agenda Public Works Director/ Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: City Engineer's Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is meet the requirements of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit. (MS4) 2. Background. The City of Orono holds a MS4 permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for operation of the City's stormwater drainage system. The NPDES is a national regulatory program under the jurisdiction of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and is administered at the State level by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA). 3. Requirement. A requirement of the permit is that an Annual Report be prepared and submitted to the MPGA. Staff has prepared the report, and will submit to the MPCA after this meeting. One component of the report is that the City must hold a Public Meeting. The meeting must provide a summary of the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP), the activities of the City for the past calendar year in regards to the permit requirements, and must afford the opportunity for public input and comment. 4. Action. There will be a short presentation as part of the public hearing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Conduct a public hearing to receive public input and comments regarding the City of Orono's SWPPP Exhibits Exhibit A. Presentation Slides 7E Prepared By: Reviewed By: JS)�a Approved By: -Tga City of Orono MS4 Permit Annual Public Meeting June 11 t", 2018 Goals of Meeting Educate interested citizens Meet a requirement of the Permit Receive comments from the public on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Stormwater Management Rules and Plans Minnesota Pollution Federal Control Program Agency EPA NPDE,q Municipal State Watershed S e crate _ p MPCA Based Program Storm MS4 Permit MCWD Sewer System City Surface SWMP Water Management Plan Environmental Protection Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Local and Global Impacts ■ Decline in aquatic biodiversity ■ Habitat loss ■ Increase flooding ■ Aesthetics ■ Human health ■ Drinking water quality decline Basic Requirements ■ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) - Best Management Practices (BMPs) ■ Measurable Goals for each BMP ■ Implementation schedule and responsible person ■ Annual Reports ■ Ordinance Development ■ Storm water System Mapping Six Minimum Control Measures ■ Public Education and Outreach ■ Public Participation and Involvement ■ Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ■ Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control ■ Post -Construction Storm Water Management ■ Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Typical Pollutant Sources MR% Dwkoi�wty Multiple Solutions — But Starts with Individual Homeowner Decisions rce: dean water 0 LL . 2017 Compliance Activities ■ Updated Surface Water Management Section of Community Management Plan ■ Updated Surface Water Management Plan ■ Articles in Newsletters ■ Stormwater information on website ■ Grass and leaf disposal program (spring and fall drop-offs) ■ Erosion control inspections (City and MCWD) ■ Street sweeping ■ Culvert repairs ■ Watershed / Pond Survey (French Lake, Lake Clausen, Maxwell Bay, and Stubbs Bay Sub Watersheds) 2018 Implementation Activities Renew MS4 permit Complete Storm Water management Plan (SWMP) Complete Surface Water Portion of Community Management Plan. Watershed /Pond Survey (Forest Lake, North Arm Painters Creek and West Arm Subwatersheds) Complete Surface Water Management Plan Stormwater inspection of 20% of the Storm System PW Maintenance Operations Process/Next Steps ■ Record comments ■ Prepare a response to each comment ■ Submit Annual Report to MPCA Questions? AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 14 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-14 —Lake West Development o/b/o Barbara Lupient Et Al, PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003, "3508" Ivy Place, Final Plat and Development Agreement Approval Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department's Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. This item is to consider the Final Plat of Ivy Place, a plat of 2 residential lots at the northern end of Ivy Place. 2. Background/ Summary. The City Council adopted resolution 6789 on September 11, 2017, approving the preliminary plat for Ivy Place, a 2 lot single family residential replat from the original three lots. On December 11, 2017, the City Council approved resolution 6821 approving variances, Conditional Use Permits, and easement vacations necessary to facilitate this development. The proposed final plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. All lots meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance in terms of lot width and size. The proposed use of the property, single family residential is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The conditions outlined in resolution have been addressed either through permits with the MCWD or in the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney. Included within the development agreement are provisions prohibiting parking on Ivy Place, an inspection of Ivy Place prior to work commencing, and regulating hauling hours related to the grading work as required by the Resolution 6821. The development agreement does not address encroachments made by adjacent property owners onto the subject property. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat and authorization of the Developers Agreement as proposed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Staff Recommendation: Motion to amend or adopt the attached resolution. Authorize Mayors signature of Development Agreement, Stormwater Maintenance agreement, and mylars. Exhibits Exhibit A. Final Plat Resolution - Draft Exhibit B. Final Plat Drawings Exhibit C. Development Agreement Exhibit D. Stormwater Management Agreement Exhibit D. Resolution 6789 References PC Staff report RE Preliminary Plat Resolution 6821 Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: jl�a Approved By: -Sb9a CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF IVY PLACE - FILE #LA18-000014 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2017 developers Lakewest Development, LLC , on behalf of owners Rick and Barbara Lupient (hereinafter the "Developers") submitted an application for approval of a Preliminary Plat for property located at the northern end of Ivy Place, a public road in the City of Orono and legally described in Exhibit A (attached); and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on September 11, 2017 the Orono City Council granted approval for the Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 6789; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on December 11, 2017 the Orono City Council granted approval for conditional use permits, variance, and easement vacations via Resolution No. 6821; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018 the Developer made formal application for final plat approval for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 6789 and 6821 and has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements and conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 6789. 2. Dedication on the plat of perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements as required in Resolution No. 6789. 3. Receipt of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits approving the grading, stormwater management facilities, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control plan. Page 1 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. 5. Execution of a Development Contract including provision of financial security including a Letter of Credit and escrow to ensure that all site improvements are installed and maintained to the City's specifications and satisfaction, and to establish conditions for future development of the site. 6. Payment of development fees as follows: a. Engineering Escrow: $7,500.00 b. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $6,050.00 WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this subdivision and hereby specify approval of each plan and identify them as part of the official record for IVY PLACE: Plat of IVY PLACE Sheet 0.0: Title Sheet Sheet 0.1: Site Survey Sheet 0.2: Final Plat Sheet 1.0: Removals (dated 2-20-2018) Sheets 2.0-2.4: Site Plans (dated 2-20-18) Sheets 3.0-3.2 Grading (dated 2-20-18) Sheets C4: Utility Plans (dated 2-20-18) Sheets C5: Detail Sheet (dated 2-20-18) Sheet C6: Tree Preservation Plan (dated 2-20-18) Sheet L1: Landscaping Plan (dated 2-20-18) Sheets SWI -1.5: SWPP Plan (dated 2-20-18) All of the above noted plans are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and subject to any additional requirements and conditions specified by the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 6789, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of IVY PLACE, Hennepin County, Minnesota (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B) subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. Development within IVY PLACE is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 6789, and subject to the provisions of the Development Contract for IVY PLACE dated June 11, 2018. 2. The City Council hereby approves the vacation of easements as specified within Resolution No. 6821. 3. The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. 4. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director, and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County on or before December 11, 2018 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the conditions of this Resolution have not been met or the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 11th day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 3 of 4 Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Exhibit A Page 4 of 4 DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: RENDER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3440 FEDERAL DRIVE, SUITE 110 EAGAN, MN 55122 651-452-5051 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6160 CARMEN AVE E INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55076 763-433-9175 ORONO, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR: CONSTRUCTION PLANS n Spring Park Sh3rrllneLtr 5 Shoreline Dr a r Shc' c- 7. C� a _ Z 4 Luk, wwds Yacht gym, Sport Condos _wL4, �e v ManchEAer Rd Pe!,man Poew q c Cumberland Rd FI ir.Rrnn Ril Uoaaiao, ca N x Tuxedo BINE X57` Goose Island xetl❑ (3lvd Aberdeen Rd -{pnp�er Rd � . m Wand Vletiy Ur Spray Island SITE LOCATION MAPAll L N SITE LOCATION MASTER LEGEND: ----IIZD ---- EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 0 X 1 137.12 EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION CO.1 SITE SURVEY C0.2 - 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL C2.0 SITE PLAN C2.1 H 41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE C2.3 SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 GRADING PLAN 0 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL C5.0 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.0 DRAINAGE ARROW SW1.0 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW i% EOF=1135.52 I -------------------- SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT IFEElk INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE B-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) O EXISTING MANHOLE ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN `' EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE 0 EXISTING STOPBOX ►� EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX EXISTING LIGHT D EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE CITY OF ORONO NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN PRIOR TO WORK. THE PLAN SHOULD OUTLINE CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, WORK IN AND NEAR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, AND ANY WORK THAT WILL REQUIRE DEWATERING. SHEET INDEX ►PHER STATE ONE CALL IVWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET CO.1 SITE SURVEY C0.2 FINAL PLAT C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C2.1 SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.2 SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.3 SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.4 SITE PLAN - FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C3.0 GRADING PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C3.2 GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS C6.0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS O O BVHSRO�e c� F CD �-g [�D 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC (3) C') L0 LL0 G O LL O LUU ^Q I..L 0 0 0 Cy') LO J co J Lr) L0 Z Z Y W z O LU O z J 2i W Ln CN N W w VJ cn W a r_n _V W = Ln QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 TITLE SHEET Como (DCOPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 929.4 contour Tree Inventory Survey for. - \1014 WEST DEVELOPMENT 117r_17mn • Iron Monument Found / —S — Sanitary Sewer —w— Watermain �pruc Spruce `mac' �•", 2 x o i o'4• Hyd.-6 Hydrant for P for ►. T`I GV • Gate Valve o , 931. / /G Po ;o / } MHO Manhole I In.926. / -I 5 �� Spruce Poplar 'I + COo Cleanout / I � Inv. Invert Elevation o / 0 4j ," / PP -C> Power Pole S 9 a c, ohh �/y �, OConcrete Surface r----- -- to !D 0 Bituminous Surface f�------��-, \ ^/ FBoulder Wall � 1 TEMPop,a� � I � / _ r / —G—Buried Gas Most westerly corner of Lot -,01\\ , „H 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION('\' \ OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot doe 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION .... .......... ^ \ OF SPRING PARK LOTS Oon 2 / o SOC Y � j 0 30 90 cole in e REVISION SUMMARY SITE SURVEY 1 " = 40'-0" 20'-0" 0 40'-0" coo NOTES * Bearings shown are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. * Contact Gopher State 1 for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Areas: Total = 94,080± square feet (2.16± acres). Lot 1 = 33,170± square feet (0.76± acre). Lot 2 = 29,960± square feet (0.69± acre). Lot 3 = 30,950± square feet (0.71± acre). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition. Tag DBH Species 961 7" Boxelder 1005 6" Boxelder 962 9" Boxelder 1006 6" Boxelder 919 8" Boxelder 963 10" Boxelder 1007 8"/18" Boxelder 920 6" Boxelder 964 6" Boxelder 1008 6"/8" Boxelder 921 8" Boxelder 965 7" Boxelder 1009 6" Boxelder 922 7" Boxelder 966 9" Boxelder 1010 3-9" Boxelder 923 8" Boxelder 967 2-8"Boxelder 1011 9" Boxelder 924 7" Boxelder 968 2-8"Boxelder 1012 9"/10" Boxelder 925 6" Boxelder 969 7" Elm 1013 8" Boxelder 926 9" Boxelder 970 6"/8"Boxelder 1014 8" Boxelder 927 10" Boxelder 971 6" Boxelder 1015 8" Boxelder 928 8" Boxelder 972 7" Boxelder 1016 9" Boxelder 929 7" Boxelder 973 6"/8" Boxelder 1017 6" Boxelder 930 7" Boxelder 974 6"/7" Boxelder 1018 7" Boxelder 931 11" Boxelder 975 7" Boxelder 1019 12" Boxelder 932 14" Boxelder 976 6" Elm 1020 7" Boxelder 933 9 " Boxelder 977 10" Boxelder 1021 6" Boxelder 934 10" Boxelder 978 8" Boxelder 1022 7" Boxelder 935 10" Boxelder 979 6"/8" Boxelder 1023 9" Boxelder 936 10" Boxelder 980 6"/8" Elm 1024 1' Boxelder 937 21" Boxelder 981 6" Boxelder 1025 22" Boxelder 938 19" Boxelder 982 6" Boxelder 1026 9" Boxelder 939 19" Boxelder 983 7" Boxelder 1027 7"/8" Boxelder 940 15" Boxelder 984 6" Boxelder 1028 7"/8" Boxelder 941 8" Boxelder 985 11'/11" Boxelder 1029 3-9" Boxelder 942 18" Boxelder 986 6" Boxelder 1030 6"/8" Boxelder 943 18" Boxelder 987 6"/7" Boxelder 1031 6" Boxelder 944 16" Boxelder 988 7"/8" Boxelder 1032 8" Elm 945 12" Boxelder 989 8" Boxelder 1033 9" Elm 946 9" Boxelder 990 12" Boxelder 1034 10" Basswood 947 11" Boxelder 991 10" Boxelder 1035 11" Boxelder 948 15" Boxelder 992 8" Boxelder 1036 11" Elm 949 16" Boxelder 993 16" Boxelder 1037 10" Elm 950 11" Boxelder 994 7" Boxelder 1038 9" Boxelder 951 16" Boxelder 995 10" Boxelder 1039 6" Boxelder 952 12" Boxelder 996 10" Boxelder 1040 7" Boxelder 953 15" Boxelder 997 9" Boxelder 1041 7" Elm 954 14" Boxelder 998 8"/10" Boxelder 1042 6" Boxelder 955 21" Boxelder 999 9" Boxelder 1043 7" Maple 956 8" Boxelder 1000 8" Boxelder 1044 13" Elm 957 6" Boxelder 1001 7" Boxelder 1045 7" Boxelder 958 6" Boxelder 1002 8" Boxelder 1046 7 "Boxelder 959 7" Boxelder 1003 8" Boxelder 1047 8 "Boxelder 960 9" Boxelder 1004 6"/6" Boxelder I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 1st day of December, 2016 REHDE:R & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal Drive " Suite 110 " iEagon, Minnesota " Phone (651) 452-5051 JOB: 164-2956.010 10 �' of 2ND DIVISI p f Plat 6/ \ N \ SPRING PgRK N OF o x\ Shown °n RLS NO. 477 N82 41'30"W 44.78 ; \ C 0— d m� 441 \ �% /A 41111111111 � V ISMO \ \ �Q 'j oh �I \ Z -p 11 O �\ .11 4C rr 27._ 9 1 _ 3x\ \ 9 " 2 \\ IVY PLACE —Hennepin County Cast Iron j Monument Reference Monument Located North Northeast of the Northeast Corner Section 20, T117, R23 N ^ Cast Iron Monument at the North 1/4 Corner of o OxV oCD M Section 20, T117, R23 --I 0 I N89o45'20"E 2664.80—,/_ N89051'44"W 589.99 L --Northeast Corner of Section 20, T117, R23 �4 �i, / /� North Line of Section 20, T117, R23 j Hennepin County Cast Iron-----_\\�� /yR9\ \ Reference Monument Located 0 1 East Northeast of the Northeast /1119, Corner Section 20, T117, R23 o AA- I� ,n / 2Ln gs� o /6cn r \ d 177 O \ / SRAo \ \ 'O / (o Rc9A \ 4 57, - \`fin 'fig / gi9m y 'y 901 / 0j2 0 o � >. �x \ \ \oo OGXoG/X \ / o c` 1d s� X / \ 01-95,0 e�" 0� \ 9 Fg� / 02 O ds tx'5 4 w Qo o � a 7 /- I / / i / i Go 0 Ln /I it / v ' ' 1 l OM1 po 1 ry V) M i� \ /oG� 10` L k v cOcs p o F o O - 0 00 QP P6 7a Oj co '�x 4j. a Most westerly corner of Lot i 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION /�/ _\\ \0 OF SPRING PARK LOTS Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \ r 'y T \ r` KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, to wit: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as IVY PLACE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of Curt Fretham, Cheif Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2018, By Curt Fretham, Cheif Manager Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of the company. Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires: 2018. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Rory L. Synstelien do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of Rory L. Synstelien, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 44565 2018. STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Notary Public, Hennepin county, Minnesota ORONO, MINNESOTA day of Notary Printed Name 2018, by Rory L. Synstelien My Commission Expires: This plat of IVY PLACE was approved and accepted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this day of 2018. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council of Orono, Minnesota By: Mayor By: Clerk I RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota i I hereby certify that taxes payable in 2018 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. ' Dated this day of 2018. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By: Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 3836.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor i By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of IVY PLACE was filed in this office this Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By: Deputy DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5� � 5 o � o NOT TO SCALE Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. day of day of 2018. 30 15 0 15 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 2018, at O'Clock M. Bearings are based on the North line of the NE 1/4 of Section 20, having an assumed bearing of N89045'20"E • Found Iron Monument as noted 0 1/2 inch by 14 Iron Monument Set Marked "RLS 44565" QO Cast Iron Monument Benchmark = MNDOT Geodetic Station BR 7180, having an elevation of 945.959 (1929 NGVD) Highest Elevation on June 23rd, 2014 = 931.11(1929 NGVD) Lowest Elevation on December 16th, 1937 = 921.78(1929 NGVD) OHW = 929.4(1929 NGVD) O O hva�0�e C4) M (o M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS contour / Aw 0 06e �k9 \ `\ Sho 7 \ re M/ `ems 6 ,001,100 � 1 � FILL EXISTING WETLAND B,� I� a2"a3 COORDINATE WITH MINNEHAHA p \\ � � CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 2 v` AND CITY OF ORONO, PRIOR TO �I 3 ��\ �� CONSTRUCTION v N ` H Top 931.24 937. S Inv. 925.80 S 8 costou� \ •!�i Inv. 921.24 a ` V, .00 937_ 4% *.\. 9 ` \ 9 REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP. 2.10� 6 5 \ 05 8\\� ```♦ \\\` / '28 � �`y/ 1 ` 1 7 11 ; �QL009 29 `� )�w�'� ♦ EXISTING DOCK TO BE REMOVED \\ v 3 -'� X�--- �4%, & RELOCATED @ ADJACENT 0 `� 31 ♦ \`� \`� PROPERTY OWNER'S DIRECTION. 16 s 1§46 00 / /� `�\ PROTECT FROM DAMAGE 013 14 49 044 A 15 / 0 47CONSTRUCTION LIMITS � �431/ ♦ `�\ \ 2 18 1922 o 33 34 �f Q �440 �c` .� 23 24 'i 0 9 I�f REMOVE EXISTING TREE, TYP. REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS 044 v? ``�� p .w SHRUBS AND UNDERGROWTH 04 In\ 26.36♦.0 � ` g2l THROUGHOUT SITE, TYP. 26 \\ � r ` 39 43 / °2 ,/Found 1/2" Iron Pipe \ •--- - 41 �\ �'''j� ; X1146 Rip /036 G� G� ;K 4 a� gj� JLj \ \ 5 EXISTING FENCE / A /G TO BE REMOVED r .3 30 pruce Spruce V 4" / �\ 1oplar /9P\ EXISTING DOCK & BOATLIFT TO BE 1 MH Inr REMOVED & RELOCATED @ i op 9 �- ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S i Inv. Q? PROTECT 5 / p, PROTECT TREES ON NEIGHBORING DIRECTION. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ` i f PROPERTY, SUPPLY TREE FENCING 1 % / ,,7" BUT KEEP ON SITE UNLESS r 0 ' �� ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 4'r e 9 i PROVIDES APPROVAL %%- *MPORAR� I an T, / Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS J Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 / Found Spike \\ �� 0 0. - Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS �. G Floor / 0� REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. CITY OF ORONO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. EXTENT OF REMOVAL AT CONNECTION TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SHOULD BE COORDINATED IN THE FIELD WITH THE CITY AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK. PAVEMENT SHOULD BE SAW -CUT FOR CLEAN MATCH LINES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR MECHANICAL WEEDER. b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCKTHORN) - REMOVE BY HAND, ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY WITH HERBICIDE. 3. NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY. 4. ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS, DEPENDING ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. 5. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORK TO FALL AND LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT, 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BYA TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR. REMOVALS LEGEND: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE ��VII (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" C�OVHO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE, IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE EX. 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL F77 AND ALL MATERIAL, REMOVAL OINCLUDING 1/1� BITACONC., AND GRAVT EL PVMTS J REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. J Ln TREE PROTECTION -• z TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE ��VII (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" C�OVHO sRote 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE, IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE J W O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma hew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 REMOVALS PLAN C1 0 ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Lo J � J Ln -• z 711- C Lf') W Y Lf) z O W a LU V o p z z Q oJ J 0 O W >lt L6C-0 N LL] U W LLJ Q _j C/) CD CSO LU Qa W 2 L0 OctN Liz J W O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma hew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 REMOVALS PLAN C1 0 ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 929.4 con �V a �►� ` � 1 , i 1, 1• CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FIELD STONE PAVERS. ♦ COORD. COLOR, STYLE AND MATERIAL w/ LANDSCAPE ARCH., SAMPLES REQUIRED, TYP. PROPOSED DOCK LOCATION, COORDINATE W/ ARCH AND OWNER MATCH PROPOSED BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TO EXISTING BITUMINOUS, TYP. / r i Found Spike--------_. Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ : Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS /00 ls,�. < PROPOSED SAND BLANKET, SEE C3.2 jcS "0O C9 O PROPOSED HOUSE PAD, ���V5 fAl COORD. w/ FINAL DESIGN FROM c9� ARCH., TYP. `♦` PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE QA: 12' WIDE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED SAND BLANKET, SEE C3.2 / Ah CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. 2. THE CONDITION OF IVY PLACE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND THE EXISTING CONDITION SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED WITH PICTURES. AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK, THE STREET SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR DAMAGE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY SITE WORK. 3. APPLICANT SHALL CONFIRM THE LOCATION OF THE DELINEATED WETLAND BEFORE INSTALL OF THE DRIVEWAY. 4. NO PARKING ALLOWED ON IVY PLACE AT ANY TIME. 5. HAULING HOURS ARE LIMITED TO 7:30AM-3:OOPM AND 4:OOPM-8:OOPM WHILE SCHOOL IS IN SESSION. 7(� WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: W11 h If III r 1 *101►1 BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES TOTAL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING 0 SF 0.00/ 302 SF 0.3% 93,778 SF 99.7% 94,080 SF 100.0°% EXISTING CONDITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 9,236 SF 9.8% OUTLOTA / 2.8% LOT TOTAL ( LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,512 SF 16.5% / 18,108 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 15,210 SF / TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,806 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner J 0� � W > g N LLI W it W a J 0 _ � Ah CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. 2. THE CONDITION OF IVY PLACE SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK, AND THE EXISTING CONDITION SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED WITH PICTURES. AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK, THE STREET SHOULD BE REVIEWED FOR DAMAGE, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY SITE WORK. 3. APPLICANT SHALL CONFIRM THE LOCATION OF THE DELINEATED WETLAND BEFORE INSTALL OF THE DRIVEWAY. 4. NO PARKING ALLOWED ON IVY PLACE AT ANY TIME. 5. HAULING HOURS ARE LIMITED TO 7:30AM-3:OOPM AND 4:OOPM-8:OOPM WHILE SCHOOL IS IN SESSION. 7(� WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. SITE AREA TABLE: W11 h If III r 1 *101►1 BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES TOTAL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING 0 SF 0.00/ 302 SF 0.3% 93,778 SF 99.7% 94,080 SF 100.0°% EXISTING CONDITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 1 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT 2 9,236 SF 9.8% OUTLOTA 2,596 SF 2.8% LOT TOTAL ( LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,512 SF 16.5% TOTAL ( LOT 1 + LOT 2 + 0 UTLOT A) 18,108 SF 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 15,210 SF 16.2% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,806 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. PROPOSED LOT 1 4,653 SF 17.5% 1,623 SF 6.1% 20,287 SF 76.4% 26,563 SF 100.0% PROPOSED LOT 2 7,296 SF 12.2% 1,940 SF 3.2% 50,469 SF 84.5% 59,705 SF 100.0% SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i' (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 0 UTLOT A 0 SF 0.0% 2,596 SF 33.2% 5,216 SF 66.8% 7,812 SF 100.0% Alp", 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" (C�017HO O 9(:�,f) 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 1- U w 3 O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 SITE PLAN C200 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. J L0 �+ z M L z W Y L0 z O0_ z LLI O Ip z o J 0� � W > g N LLI W it W a J 0 _ � 11 W i1- C O 0 co W M M = O W = 04 QN LO J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 SITE PLAN C200 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. --929.4 contour I----------- i / �♦ e ��♦ /X/F 9ti G !� X Apo //� \ fes/ DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT` PER DOCUMENT N0. T5010662 I \ \ \\ ♦♦ L Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----- ---- .-- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS 'S1 U O �� / \ Found 1/2" Iron Pipe----- 70 \ � / i \ ny 1 / I I /I C / 'J / 33.3 / \ �0 EASEMENT AREAS: DRAINAGE AND SHORE STABILIZATION EASEMENT SUMMARY TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 8500 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENTWITHIN 0 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN 284 [sf] (temporary, annually) SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i' (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 0 0 0 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 1— U W 3 O d M L0 2 0 0 0 LdU J O O (O C'7 V U-) J M J L0 .. z z Y Wz O a LL! Oz z J 2 W g N N W w 0 ~ D V♦ ~ W Q 17 W z QN L(7 J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 SITE PLAN - DRNG & SHORE STBL EASE C2.1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.I �---929.4 contour ♦ _ -�------------ 0 `/ �V F 9+ -10 \ IN, \IN .♦ `11% VACATE EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT -V7 \ I I� I I \ i ` \ C 0 \ % \ / • `� y �01'nc� \ \ \ O 1 Qo r1 1 I I II I I I I I / I / I 1 i /CO I \ Found Spike----.... ROADWAY EASEMENT TO REMAIN Found 1/2" Iron Pipe.-.--.-. / / / / / ,j /5 /Z° / I spruce y // / P lar / Poplar / 33.3 / G Floor / Most westerly corner of Lot O 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS o \ \ Most southerly corner of Lot • • �,b 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION --------- OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ O0C \\ yo 9 01 7(� (C 0 OR ge �017 H 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 1— U W 3 O O M L0 2 0 0 0 LdU J O O (O lqt J L0 �+ z z Y Wz O a w oz z J 2 W N W w 0 Cn ~ W Q r_n V W = QN J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN LEGEND: 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE �O GOPHER STATE ONE CALL \ � WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG ^� (800 (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 252-1166 TOLL FREE 4 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" .: 1 SITE PLAN - ROADWAY EASE C2.2 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' --929.4 contour I----------- � i / e if �/ \\ �♦ / REALIGNED UNDERGROUND UTILITY `♦ O / EASEMENT 10.0' \\ `�♦ v'9 931.24 TYP. \ ``� "V9 ` In . 21.24 W \/L \ \ Apo js \ \ . %♦ \ \ \ IN \/Ar'ATC CYIQTINf_' c9; O (9 /j c90_ •O� \%, / Found 1/2" Iron Pipe ----0 / � / / / All - spruce y l� / / 1 / / 1.44 .%P lar / I v 9 6.84 l / � Poplar I `n / I,o . 33.3 G Floor Top 932.10 Inv. 927.20 Found Spike - ..... _._...... / // / / rn Most westerly corner of Lot \ \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - -- '- \ ` \\� MH OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----- -- -- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS \ �0 EASEMENT AREAS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT SUMMARY (based on nr000sed/reallianed eosemen t condition) TOTAL EASEMENTAREA 9714 [sf] AREA OF PROPOSED PAVEMENTWITHIN (including existing pavementfrom 196 [sf] adjacent property) AREA OF PROPOSED DOCK WITHIN 200 [sf] (temporary, annually) SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE 0 0 0 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 1— U W 3 O M L0 2 0 0 0 LdU J O O (o (Y) J M J L0 .. z Z Y W z O a LL! Oz z J 2 W g N W W 0 D V♦ ~ W Q 17 (D W z QN L(7 J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SETBACK LINE I REVISION SUMMARY EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i' (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" .: 1 SITE PLAN - UNDGRND UTIL EASE C2.3 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' 'o \ % �\ Apo \\ O 5fFLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION \ I \ \ \ e c9 EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE WETLAND A, TVP. i I IN \ �♦ ��� � I � •O I \ l� jl �I II l 1 1� Found Spike Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS I I I I I FLOWAGE AND CONSERVATION \ \ EASEMENT, TO INCLUDE WETLAND A, TYP. \ / h5bb ♦. 7 \% / \ Found 1/2" Iron Pipe-------. / / / , / A / ny V ' I �C 'J A \ �0 7Q SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE WETLAND LINE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE i' (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 1 " = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 0(C�'VH' RN, (ZF]QCDU[�D 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC W V Q J a I— U W 3 O M L0 2 0 0 0 U J O O (O C'7 J L0 .. z Z Y W z O aW oz z J 2 W g N N W w V♦ ~ W Q W z QN J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 SITE PLAN -FLOWAGE & CONSERVATION EASE C2.4 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS / 30.30 !029.92 MATCH -- MATCH AT .81 i g�1 00 00 ` 30.38 MATCH 31.04 i ` MATCH f ` I\ 33.00 N\� � 34. 3.10 3 0 M - CH 33.50 34.00 1 1 \ Lo ` 13.50 1 � \ 34.0C 30.37 MATCH \ `, \\ 9 1 �� NSTRUCTION LIMITS o � 30.57 \ MATCH %\ Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS ,� ♦ sho''e 6 \Z31.28 1rIATCH / IF do s contour \` #46 �.. tS ` "P 30.97 MATCH Oji e O mac' `33.009 ♦ 4%,�� `♦ �� �� ♦ m\ 34.00 � �� 9 to . Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - OF SPRING PARK LOTS 'MATCH Qwi� 31.27 �♦ MATCH ` 11 `, �1 1 IIID 31.06 MATCH 3JO MTC i J_ 0 _ 1 ` 29.23 MATCH . 1/ o� 93 go 14 INSET A nd 1/2" Iron Pipe ---- 00 -a+ 1.7 .07� �h5 �b N" 10�� ATCHF,�\�# - 34.20 MATCH SEE INSET A EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATED 03-30-2016 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 914.80 TO 925.70 THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: SB -1 914.80 SB -2 919.10 SB -3 925.70 SB -4 924.90 REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1 % MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4.1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 881.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=891.00 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Alp�' 1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" (C�OVHO sRote R Co n -g 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE, IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE 711- (3) cY) Lf') L0 O 0 0 LU0 Q O O C0 Cy') Lo J co Lo z Z Y Lu z 0 LU az O z J 2i W CN N W Lu W a (D W 2 L0 QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 GRADING PLAN C300 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ _ 00 Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ---------- OF ----- —OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: EXISTING FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BETWEEN THE 929.4 CONTOUR AND THE 931.5 CONTOUR EXISTING VOLUME=562CY of CUT/FILL SUMMARY TABLE: Excavation Volume (Cu. Yd.) Fill Volume (Cu. Yd.) 614.9 2,962.5 CNet Difference: 2,347.6 Cu. Yd. Borrow 0 0 BVHS�Ote �QCO)U[�D 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 s .13 o r 0.,.I v r Urr r! i JIF 81 1 \ DEVELOPMENT, LLE MATCH 30.57' MATCH 30.1, MATCH 30.47 '-33.24 MATCH �, 31.83 MATCH \\ 31.27 , MATCH 31 i31.08 I J MATCH 34.00 J 34.00 34.00 FFE=934.00 34.00 34.00 34. 0 34.00 r� 32.43 4.00 \ 33. 0 s N 29.23 MATCH I Ar�ch�ATCH !' 1' 2 ♦ �% M tH s ,� 31. 1 i l32.09 MATCH l y�/ I 31.90 �' . G Floor MATCH MATCH / r / Found Spike ---- ---_..._�� %;'aaa 1 --� 1 � r - \ Hyd. \ Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS 0 r Most southerly corner of Lot \, 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS FLOODPLAIN CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN, VOLUME BETWEEN THE 929.4 CONTOUR AND THE 931.5 CONTOUR PROPOSED VOLUME=647CY FLOODPLAIN LEGEND: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WW W.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 1 ” = 30'-0" 15'-0" 0 30'-0" 1— U W 0 M L0 Cz G 0 0 O LLJIU a J O O (O (Y) V U-) J M J L0 .. z Z Y W z O LLJ �- z O z J 2 W g N N W w O D U ~ W Q W Z QN L(7 J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY 0.:17059 GRADING PLAN - FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION C301 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. _ Aq, /!19. 2- J - - FiIATCFfi - - - - - � 4NICH �-- - - - DELINEATED WETLAND "A" 30.38 7 MATCH / WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, I COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION; TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE 31.28 BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY \ �.,IIIAATCH LINE. /� DELINEATED WETLAND "B" c9 � �� �" (TO BE FILLED) v 451 %� ♦ ° r PROPOSED SAND B'CAKET.. _ �O\ �� �. `��� TCH I/ \ 3 0� SAND CANNOT BE PLACN .00 3.00 �� ANY EMERGENT VEGETATIa�i �30 97 CONTRACTOR MUST ADHERED, IF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS DO OCCUR, EXISTING GRADES MUST BE RESTORED AND CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW #3 UNDER WINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTES' ON THIS SHEET. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 34.0 937_ ♦ 41% CH TO ALL MN DNR & MCWD a \ ♦ .�2 \ REOUIREMENTS AT ALL TIMES c92 0 \10 M-TCH i \� \ ?� 4' WIDE SAND TRAIL FOR \ ` \ mss, M `` RIPARIAN ACCESS Cn 33.5\0 34.00 34.00 \ X C33\00 4' WIDE SAND TRAIL FOR ttLO 9 RIPARIAN ACCESS 33. 0 ` 34.00 \ \ ♦ ` ` \ PROPOSED SAND BLANKET. T, \ FFE=934.00 \ _ �� p SAND CANNOT BE PLACED ON 34.00 ANY EMERGENT VEGETATION, MATCH , + 33.� CONTRACTOR MUST ADHERE .23 TO ALL MN DNR & MCWD CH REQUIREMENTS AT ALL TIMES t. t 34.00 \ t � 34.00 ' ♦ ♦ \ rn � \ 34.00 \ !� .21 34 00 33.60 34.00 � � 0 WETLAND BUFFER SIGN, COORDINATE TYPE AND LOCATION w/ WATERSHED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY LINE. V O 34.00 '��' 8 0 \ 30.57 / ] / • 'I MATCH \ OO \ 34.00 33.74 .37 33.3 �3 IQ 1 y3_33 / \ 04 3.16J 34.00 34.00 P. P /z it n it 30*7 MATOW 6 X33. 34.00 - 32.46 � X32.29/ / FFE=934.00 CP�� 3 4 �� !� 3 47 34.00 34.00 30.1` O MATCH DRAIN RUNOFF FROM 31. 2 3 15 1.70 O� \ 34.0A%DRAIN PROPERTY3 .00 O O TOWARD LAKE/LAGOON 30.` 1 `� DOS THROUGH SWALE, TYP. 1.7 2 H 28.92 MATCH 2M K M ' 31.83 34.00 .07/ - 0 ,►�►� ���0 3 .2 32.43 / �o ATN 31.81 9�� 1 4.00 TCH( ,; tt 1 33.80 e o�� / y 32 50 HIP / j • i x,32.24 I � / 6' H 39� 4lar " P for op 0I r NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED I'A CH SITE SHOULD BE DIRECTED THE AREA ALONG THE ENTRANCE DRIVE TOi•�9 TOWARDS THE ADJACENT ` i l IkMATCH PROPE TY OWNER NARROW TO MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE SEEDED THE SAME AS THE ADJACENT BUFFER AREA BUT WILL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS SQUARE M 2 �i • / Ik` �/ FOOTAGE OF BUFFER AREA. i CO / WETLAND BUFFER 32.09 REQUIREMENTS ATCH 33.3 / NOT MET ALONG 31.90 Floor ENTRANCE DRIVE MATCH A2 M C �orx i 4444 Found Sr"" -- / i Hyd. \ Most westerly corner of Lot WETLAND BUFFER SIGN'" 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION - - ''� COORDINATE TYPE AND OF SPRING PARK LOTS LOCATION w/ WATERSHED \ PRIOR TO -CONSTRUCTION; TYP. v / EVERY 100 LF OR WHERE BUFFER CROSSES PROPERTY \ LINE.\ Most southerly corner of Lot f IO 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- \\ �� OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ `� MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTES: 1. ALL DISTURBED SOILS WITHIN THE PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES AND ORGANIC MATTER MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO SOILS BEFORE REVEGETATION. DECOMPACTION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED SOLELY BY INCORPORATION OF ORGANIC MATTER WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES OR WITHIN 10 FEET OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 2. CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE WETLAND A MARKED WITH FLAGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE. 3. ANY TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO DELINEATED WETLAND A MUST BE TRACKED AND REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, THESE IMPACTS WILL NEED TO BE QUANTIFIED. ONCE THE TEMPORARY IMPACT HAS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR MUST FOLLOW SEQUENCING GUIDELINES TO RESTORE WETLAND TO AS CLOSE TO NATIVE CONDITION AS POSSIBLE: •• CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ANY CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIAL OR .• SOIL THAT HAS BEEN INTRODUCED TO WETLAND. CONTRACTOR TO •• FOLLOWSOIL OGUIDELINES CONTRACTOR TO RE -SEED IMPADCTED WETLAND AREA WITH WET MEADOW SEED •• ANY IMPACTED I AREACONTRACTOR.BY LANDSCAPE S OF EMERGENT VEGETATION MUST BE RE -PLANTED WITH PLUGS SPECIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS TABLE: WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BUFFER WIDTH MINIMUM 12.5 LF MAXIMUM 50 LF BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS. BUFFER AREA NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS LENGTH OF WETLAND A WITH LESS THAN 12.5' BUFFER w Lo 8 LF @ SAND BLANKET (4' WIDE RIPARIAN TRAIL) co 336 SF AREA OF WETLAND A BUFFER NOT PROVIDED FOR 69' J Lr) L0 100 SF LENGTH (25' BUFFER) 0 SF 711- C Ln LENGTH OF WETLAND A WITH LESS THAN 12.5' BUFFER Y LO 69 LF WIDTH @ ENTRANCE DRIVE SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS az AREA OF WETLAND A BUFFER NOT PROVIDED FOR 69' V o p 863 SF LENGTH 25' BUFFER J 2i TOTALADDITIONAL BUFFER AREA NEEDEDTO BE 0 O WL6C-0 >4t PROVIDED FOR DUETO NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS 24,850 SF Lu U W 963 SF ALONG ENTREANCE DRIVE AND FILLING IN OF BEACH Ma hew R. Pavek AREAS � DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE No. 44263 PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS TABLE: WETLAND AREA TABLE 9,871 SF TOTAL WETLAND (ON SITE) 9,871 SF UNDISTURBED 0 SF FILLED WETLAND B 168 SF FILLED WETLAND/BUFFER MITIGATION TABLE: WETLAND MITIGATION TOTAL PROPOSED FILLAREA (WTLNDs A&B) REQUIRED MITIGATION - 2:1 ON-SITE PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION AREA: (MITIGATION TO OCCUR OFFSITE) BUFFER INFORMATION EXISTING PERIMETER OF WETLAND A PROPOSED PERIMETER OF WETLAND A REQUIRED ON-SITE" PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA: *(including entrance drive & beaches) REQUIRED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURAL WETLAND BUFFER AREA: *(including 4' bumpout along entirety for mulch trail) PROVIDED ON-SITE PROPSOED NATURALWETLAND BUFFERAREA:! *(including entrance drive & beaches) LEGEND O O (C�VHsRote p Oo n -L r 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE, IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE 168 SF w Lo J co 336 SF O J Lr) L0 -• z 0 SF 711- C Ln W Y LO z O LULU SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS az PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT V o p z Q o J 2i J 0 O WL6C-0 >4t N 24,850 SF Lu U W LLJ Q _j Ma hew R. Pavek � DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE No. 44263 C7 > C/) O LU a DATE I DESCRIPTION W 2 L0 OctN Liz 168 SF w J 336 SF O 0 SF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS 994 LF PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY 994 LF LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 24,850 SF Z& 28,826 SF Ma hew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE No. 44263 29,414 SF ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION WETLAND BUFFER - MnDOT SEED MIX 34-262 WET PRAIRIE. SPREAD AT 14.5 LBS/ACRE AND PER MnDOT SEEDING MANUAL. PROPOSED SAND BLANKET PER MN DNR REQUIREMENTS. 10' WATERWARD OF OHW MAXIMUM. MAY NOT PLAVE ON ANY EMERGENT VEGETATION. AREA LONG ENTRANCE DRIVE WHERE 12.5' WETLAND BUFFER AREA NOT MET U WETLAND MONUMENT SIGN - COORDINATE TYPE AND SPACING WITH MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PRoJECTNO.: 17059 GRADING PLAN - WETLAND ALTERATION C302 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS Or -929.4 contour - �I----------- �i' , �.� ♦♦ GUTTER REAR HALF OF HOUSES TO AREA DRAIN AND PIPE INTO ` UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, TYP. ♦ COORD. LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS W/ 7 ♦v : w' sho ARCH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. UNDERGROUND STORMWATER PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE ON ALL DETENTION SYSTEM 2 �\ PVC CONNECTIONS TO 12" PERF. CMP \ ♦ UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS (2) HEADERS ��\` 12" SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION 6" STONE COVER ' r FOOTPRINT=17.0'x64.0' IE 12" CMP=930.00 N`� MH OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 % < Top 931.24 OE 6" ORIFICE=930.40 Inv. 9.80 S \ Inv. 92121.24 w OE 6" ORIFICE=930.50 � ` ♦ \ TOP 12" CMP=931.00 TOP STONE=931.50 \ \ ♦♦ 100 -YR HWL=931.38 54LF 11 \ CONNECT TO EXISTIN STORM @ SANITARY STUB�`���`���`�� CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, AND � ELEVATION OF EXISTIN SANITARY SERVICE. REP T FINDINGS TO ENGINEER 22LF 2" PVC CONSTRUCTION LIMITSO ° i , OO STORM @ 1.05% O 22LF 6"x2 PVC OO STORM @ 3.32%, / \ OO 2.86% �. STUB 2" WAT / SERVICE TO WITHIN 5' 2 2" PVC / �< FROM HOUSE OO STORMM @ 0.79% / y ♦ 26, STUB 2" WATER ♦ ♦ O SERVICE TO WITHI O FROM HOUSE r\� � ♦ r 1 , I 1i 1� 1 e• I 2" COPPER WATER . i SERVICE. COORDIN SIZING W/ MECHANI WET TAP (2) SERVICES 1 CO DESIGNING IN HOU; TO EXISTING WATER �i SPRINKLER SYSTEM STUB. COORDINATE W/ PRI : R TO CONSTRL CITY - fr lop 932.10 Inv. 927.20 � Found Spike- 0 Most westerly corner of Lot 185 TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION Hyd. OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ : Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS COOR TO VERIFY OCA41N SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING WATER SERVICE. REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER / / `5,1- �/� js c92 0 .(9& !�k (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. /10a_ 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLO1�f� INFLOW, TYP. HDPE FES 1 4- I E=±929.50 •/ RIPRAP TO NWL INSTALL NON -RETURN VALVE TO DISALLOW LAKE/FLOOD WATER FROM ENTERING SYSTEM. ,INSTALL CONCRETE HEADWALL AND NDENT GUARD PER MANUF. SPECS. PROVIDE CLAY LINER ♦ BENEATH AND ON SIDES ♦ OFUNDERGROUND 4 1'' FILTRATION SYSTEMS, TYP. 41 R - CONFECT TO EXISTING SANITARY STUB CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE. REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER (3) ACCESS RISER, TYP. 12" SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLOW INFLOW, TYP. - UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM 1 12" PERF. CMP J(g�HEADERS 1 SIDE & END STONE, 12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION 6" STONE COVER FOOTPRINT=11.0'x64.0' IE 12" CMP=930.00 OE 2" ORIFICE=930.00 OE (x2) 4" ORIFICE=930.25 TOP 12" CMP=931.00 TOP STONE=931.50 100 -YR HWL=931.47 CITY OF ORONO UTILITY NOTES: 1. TELEVISE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND REPORT FINDINGS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ONCE SANITARY SEWER STUBS ARE EXPOSED AND LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION ARE FIELD VERIFIED, LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF SERVICE CONNECTION SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY THE CITY TO ENSURE IT IS INSTALLED AS PROPOSED. THE CONTRACTOR MUST DOCUMENT THE INSTALLATION WITH PICTURES TO PROVIDE A GRAPHIC RECORD. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN SOF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. GRADING FLOODPLAIN NOTES (CITY & WATERSHED): 1. FILLING IN THE FLOODPLAIN WILL BE MITIGATED ON SITE AT A 1:1 VOLUME RAT 10. 2. PER CITY OF ORONO RULES, THE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION (LFE) OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 932.5 OR HIGHER. 3. PER MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RULES, THE LOW OPENING OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 933.5 OR HIGHER. UTILITY LEGEND: • CATCH BASIN m MANHOLE ►� GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER > ----- () PVC STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP GOPHER STATE ONE CALL A' WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG I \1 (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE ���111 (651) 454-0002 LOCAL O1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" C�' 7H, 0 R 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE LO J co J Lr) L0 z z Y W z 0 a LU Oz J 2i W O >lt N W Lu U) C/) W a W 2 Ln QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 1 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT N0.:1705UTILITY PLAN C4.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' BUILDING DOWNSPOUT REFER TO ARCH'L EXTEND DOWNSPOUT AND POINT DOWN OVER 6 -11111 Compacted Backfill —I — CENTER OF GRATE _I Bc 111I q 5B i- 2000# Concrete 8"X8" NYLOPLAST - = — RECTANGULAR DUCTILE -'I "'— LOAD FACTOR 2 3 SLOPE TO � �.SBc "Bc" Denotes outside SLOPE TO DRAIN IRON GRATE, OR Bc+12" Min. CLASS A Denotes of pipe DRAIN APPROVED EQUIVALENT Concrete backfill to 0.5 L of outside diameter with shaped bedding. COMPACTED SOIL 1 8" GRATE TO 4" PIPE INLINE DRAIN ADAPTER III=1 I' CONCRETE COLLAR ON COMPACTED BACK FILL cccc > 4" PVC SEWER RISER PIPE 12" (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 4" PVC LONG RADIUS a BEND SEWER ELBOW 4" PVC SEWER PIPE CRUSHED AND COMPACTED STONE DOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTION NTS DIA + 3' MATERIAL 1'-6" (MIN) NOTES: 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL NTS I" THICK IRD (USE 2-2" MASTIC ALL JOINTS kTION BOARD DOWN EPTH. Compacted Backfill Course Filter Aggregate MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS Compacted Backfill (Cac)7HO SRO�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 12" 1 + + + + + + + + + + + — Granular Borrow + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + Bc + + + + I, (MnDOT Spec. + + + + + + + + + 3149A modified) 6„ �= + + + + + + I; III—III-III—III—III— - ~ U W Min.—Bc+12 "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe � 12 - PIPE PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS T Compacted Backfill 1+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I1- 12„ =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + 1= Bedding - + + + + + + Bc + + + + + + ' -1 + + + + + + + + + 1— + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + �, 6" �/1_I; Faundation = ��ablle/ "Be" Denotes outside Minimum diameter of pipe 2d+Bc+12" Course Filter Agg. (MnDot Spec. 3149H Modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS M L0 L0 z 2 0 0 0 U J O O (O C'7 V U-) J LoLo �+ z z Y W z 0 Lu a' Z O z J 2 W N N W w 0 C ~ W Q W z Lo QN J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 CIVIL DETAILS C5.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' LOAD FACTOR 1.9 Bc+12" Min, Do" Denotes outside CLASS B� diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material 6" - Ir - I Bc 4 - Compacted Backfill I ;I „II IIllli- LOAD FACTOR 1,5 00,5Bc "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C-1 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soli 6 III —� Bc11-I Compacted Backfill Bc/4 but no =1 + + �c +++ hi- Course Filter Aggregate less than 6" + + + + + + +_111- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. — I—III—I I—I II—III —I I-1EF i- "Be" Denotes outside LOAD FACTOR CLASS C-2 1.5 Bc+12" Min, diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS Compacted Backfill (Cac)7HO SRO�e 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 12" 1 + + + + + + + + + + + — Granular Borrow + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + Bc + + + + I, (MnDOT Spec. + + + + + + + + + 3149A modified) 6„ �= + + + + + + I; III—III-III—III—III— - ~ U W Min.—Bc+12 "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe � 12 - PIPE PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS T Compacted Backfill 1+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I1- 12„ =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + 1= Bedding - + + + + + + Bc + + + + + + ' -1 + + + + + + + + + 1— + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + �, 6" �/1_I; Faundation = ��ablle/ "Be" Denotes outside Minimum diameter of pipe 2d+Bc+12" Course Filter Agg. (MnDot Spec. 3149H Modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS M L0 L0 z 2 0 0 0 U J O O (O C'7 V U-) J LoLo �+ z z Y W z 0 Lu a' Z O z J 2 W N N W w 0 C ~ W Q W z Lo QN J � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY .: 1 CIVIL DETAILS C5.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' CONSTRUCTION LIMITS No DBH SPECIES CONDITION REMOVED �-�-929.4 cont` 919 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES '— 920 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES `♦` 921 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 922 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES ♦ ♦ � �kc) 923 8 BOXELDER POOR YES I JP 06e `924 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 7 \\\♦/` -51 0119 925 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 70 s �C` 926 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 2k 6 ♦♦ 927 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 928 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES \ �♦ ��` • 929 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES / 3 0 72 �73 7 0 930 7 BOXELDER POOR YES r 7 931 11 BOXELDER POOR YES 4j7 3 d 932 14 BOXELDER POOR YES ♦ �< ` 9 �k76 ♦ 9+0 933 9 BOXELDER POOR YES 934 10 BOXELDER POOR YES � s 8 \ ), 935 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES %% tS 0 936 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES {Xj1102 \ �` `o 937 21 BOXELDER FAIR YES 7 \ `% a 938 19 BOXELDER FAIR YES \ ,\ 9 a 009 01 � � �2� �!�k 939 19 BOXELDER POOR YES \`.t 940 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 6 CQ 5 Ot 0 os �s \ \\ //� 41 941 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES %i .�♦ �� 942 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 4 �. 943 18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 28 ♦ �O 944 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES ` •� 7 009 29 945 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES � �1 6 ISO, 11 ♦ 946 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES Ga,2 12 � 947 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES 948 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES 3 949 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 31 / ♦♦ 950 11 BOXELDER POOR YES %47 46 13 / 951 16 BOXELDER POOR YES \ ♦♦ t15 952 12 BOXELDER POOR YES 953 15 BOXELDER FAIR YES CONSTRUCTION LIMITS49 04417 47 / �° ♦ 954 14 BOXELDER FAIR YES ` �96 ♦ 43 �`'� / ` 955 21 BOXELDER POOR YES 2 18 ; X],p19 21 )!f�'�r,�R 22 � 0% 956 956 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 1 ° 33�z 957 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 34 0 35 958 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES `\ ao 023 024 / 9 959 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 960 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES \ 044 \\ 04 961 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES `♦ 962 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 26 039 s 043 / 963 10 BOXELDER POOR YES °2 Found 1/2" Iron Pipe ------- .�� x.70 964 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 41 ./ �� 965 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES ♦ / a6 / 966 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES ♦` r / 967 2-8 BOXELDER POOR YES ♦ 968 2-8 BOXELDER FAIR YES ♦ � 7 969 7 ELM FAIR YES ♦` / 970 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES /G`� 971 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 36 972 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES \%' 0 973 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES \\\ 40 4 ®Jcjk• 974 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YES \ s / 975 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 976 6 ELM FAIR YES \\\ j�3 : e j����� / 977 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES SCC 978 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 2 3Spruc pruce m 979 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Poplar1• / 980 6/8 ELM POOR YES 6 'P lar" Poplar 981 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1 . Sp 3• s" / 982 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1 i 1 5 Poplar / 983 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 984 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 4 9 985 11/11 BOXELDER POOR YES 3 / . 986 6 BOXELDER POOR YES f J f I / I Found Spike- / // 4444 t I. Most westerly corner of Lot \ \ 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ : Most southerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION ----------- f \\ OF SPRING PARK LOTS I REMOVALS LEGEND: 4, X O��%HO O987 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YES � �% Rt 988 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES R p=L FP, 989 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 990 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES CivilSiteGroup.com 991 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 992 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 993 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 994 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 995 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 996 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 997 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LAKE', WEST 998 8/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 999 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES DEVELOPMENT, ���1000 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1001 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1002 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1003 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1004 6/6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1005 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1006 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1007 8/18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1008 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1009 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1010 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1011 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1012 9/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1013 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1014 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1015 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1016 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1017 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1018 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 1019 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES LID 1020 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES J � 1021 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES J LO 1022 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES LID 1023 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES ^ Z 1024 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES c711- Y 1025 22 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1026 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO LUZ LO 1027 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1028 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES LULU a 1029 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES O Z O Z 1030 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Z J 2i 1031 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 0 1032 8 ELM POOR YES 0 N 1033 9 ELM FAIR YES a LL] 1034 10 BASSWOOD POOR YES (j W Lu 1035 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES Q Q — 1036 11 ELM FAIR YES 11 U) 1037 10 ELM POOR YES > (n >- pl 1038 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES > LU 1039 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES CD W >Q> 1040 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES � 2 1041 7 ELM FAIR YES (D 1042 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES W 2 1043 7 MAPLE FAIR YES N 1044 13 ELM FAIR YES Liz 1045 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES U J 1046 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES w 1047 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES EXISTING TREES TOTALTREES 129 FAIR CONDITION 103 / 103 SAVED= 0 SAVED= 0 I REMOVALS LEGEND: 4, X O��%HO O987 6/7 BOXELDER FAIR YES � �% Rt 988 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES R p=L FP, 989 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 990 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES CivilSiteGroup.com 991 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 992 8 BOXELDER POOR YES 993 16 BOXELDER FAIR YES 994 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 995 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 996 10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 997 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LAKE', WEST 998 8/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 999 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES DEVELOPMENT, ���1000 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1001 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1002 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1003 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1004 6/6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1005 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1006 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1007 8/18 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1008 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1009 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1010 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1011 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1012 9/10 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1013 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1014 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1015 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1016 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1017 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1018 7 BOXELDER POOR YES 1019 12 BOXELDER FAIR YES LID 1020 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES J � 1021 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES J LO 1022 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES LID 1023 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES ^ Z 1024 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES c711- Y 1025 22 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1026 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES LO LUZ LO 1027 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES 1028 7/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES LULU a 1029 3-9 BOXELDER FAIR YES O Z O Z 1030 6/8 BOXELDER FAIR YES Z J 2i 1031 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES 0 1032 8 ELM POOR YES 0 N 1033 9 ELM FAIR YES a LL] 1034 10 BASSWOOD POOR YES (j W Lu 1035 11 BOXELDER FAIR YES Q Q — 1036 11 ELM FAIR YES 11 U) 1037 10 ELM POOR YES > (n >- pl 1038 9 BOXELDER FAIR YES > LU 1039 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES CD W >Q> 1040 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES � 2 1041 7 ELM FAIR YES (D 1042 6 BOXELDER FAIR YES W 2 1043 7 MAPLE FAIR YES N 1044 13 ELM FAIR YES Liz 1045 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES U J 1046 7 BOXELDER FAIR YES w 1047 8 BOXELDER FAIR YES EXISTING TREES TOTALTREES 129 FAIR CONDITION 103 REMOVED = 103 SAVED= 0 POORCONDITION 26 129 REMOVED = 26 SAVED= 0 TREE REPLANTING EXISTING TREES REMOVED 129 PROPOSEDTREES 94 *SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED TREES TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 4 it 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 IPLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 1 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C6.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST ...` 2 - PCW ` " SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST �• • • • • •,%•+ + + + + + + + + ,_�- SEEDING ZONE C, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST ......... + + +++ + * +++++ 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. ++++ + + + ++ 6 ++r + + + + + + ++ + * *++++� - _ 2-SWO + + ++++++ + + �m +++ +++ + ++ + \ s + + i + + + + + + + + + + + / + 2 -PB + + + + ++++ ++ ++ + ++ + + + ++ :. +++++ ++++ + 4 - RB ++ ++ ++++ +++ + - + Coe + 2-NRM '9 yN + + a:+++++;..... ++ ++++++�+ + + + + PROPOSED SAND KET, SEE C3.2, TYP. i PLANT SCHEDULE - TREES SYM QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS DECIDUOUS TREES NRM 18 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE Acer rubrum'Northwood' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM FFSM 7 FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum'Bailsta' 4.0" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM PCW 3 PRAIRIE CASCADE WEEPING WILLOW Salix'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM RB 15 RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM PB 5 PAPER BIRCH Betula papyrifera 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM SWO 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM HB 2 HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ORNAMENTALTREES ABS 5 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM THH 7 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli 'lnermis' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM BB 5 BLUE BEECH Carpinus caroliniana 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM EVERGREEN TREES BHS 5 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca'Densata' 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM WP 7 WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM WC 9 WHITE CEDAR Thuja occidentalis 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM 4' WIDE MULCH PATH, TYP. `• :�:�• • + +* •1 �M'� `-:� �--• + ++ *.. `•` �"' �; �Oj �;`'` t + + + + + �. 3 FFSM + + �s. ti ^� 4-Rg o NATIVE SEEDING NOTES &SPECIFICATIONS: 1 RB *++++ + r'-'' .. ,- ♦ SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEN ANT L 1. INSTALL ALL SEED MIXES PER SEED SUPPLIERS INSTRUCTIONS, OR EMPLOY SUPPLIER TO SEED MATERIAL CORRECTLY. + SEEDING ZONE B, SEE LEGEND &'XpAT 2. PLANTING OF SEED MATERIAL BUT BE ACCOMPANIED BY CONTINUED MAINTENANCE BY THE SEEDING COMPANY UNTIL FULL COVERAGE IS ESTABLISHED SEEDING ZONE C, SEE -'c9 LEGEND & PLANT LIST 2 - ABS \++ + + + + + 1 SWO WIDE ND TRAM:: + + ♦ , + + ++ + + + ++\.•. - -_' IP N'ACCESS + * * * * \.:* * * * ♦ SEEDING ZONE A, SEE LEGEND & PLANT LIST + + + + + + o ++++ + ++ c3� + SEEDING ZONE B, SEE + ++ +*+++*+*+ \++ + 3 WC t... . C...... + ++++ ++ ++ +++s LEGEND & PLANT LIST -' '.'.'.'.'.". + + + + + + + + .. • ° _ + 2 SWO :::: + + + ` + + + �•• '- + + + PROPOSED SAND BLANKET, + + ++++�" / o�. +++ + +++ +� 1 -RB ++++ + + ++++++++ SEE C3.2, TYP. + + + + + SEEDING ZONE A, SEE , ... + + + + + ++++++ \ +tt++ "\ _• LEGEND & PLANT LIST+ �.•'• +* + + +*+*+* **+ + + + + ++++ + 1_BB + + + + + ++:+ 2- FFSM "' + +++ �r + + + + + + + + ICs- - / - 3 RB RM + + + + + + + t .�� • \ + + + + + } CO ' � � SEEDING ZONE B, SEE + 4 -� ++++ ++++�•-• `--.• LEGEND &PLANT LIST 3p ::' 1 _PCW *+ +++++++ / WIDE SAND T ++ ++ + + ++ . O 3 THH ARIAN ACCE. R. +. + ++..... SEEDING ZONE A, +`+ ++ + ++ + 0 2-A13 *+ SEE LEGEND &PLANT •�---+++++` --{ ,�"- - ++ � LIST 2 - FFSM .. LANDSCAPE NOTES: _ :+.+*+++++:+ } �.:- � �=THH - - - .-' -- - • "-: ;.--•' :• .. /' s + �+ + o + + + ++ + 1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE ` + - 1 - NRM SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER. OWNER'S \\\ + 2 NRM + rt+- ..A 1 -THH REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.: EDGING SHALL BE METAL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. \ ".: _OO i 3 - WC 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD \` `<_0 1 - PB I - S WP MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING .:� O BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A \ �O 1 -THH + `++* MINIMUM F 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. \ 0 O / U 0 0 U 0 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN 2 - RB \ ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND �♦ ` ' i DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE Spruce PERIOD. 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITYt + 6" lar / OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 1 Ir+� '+�' _ g 1 r + Poplar / 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE 3 - WP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE / �I / CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS /:.. FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. +++++ , I 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL 1 \+* RECEIVE 6" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 11-N 7. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND / 0 AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL �/ y, r -°"/ r_' 3F CLEARING & GRUBBING - INVASIVE SPECIES: BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.Top 8. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED Inv. 932.10 �/ , P 1. VERIFY AREA OF VEGETATION REMOVAL 927.20 UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. I /H �\ Twp G 2. FOR LIMITED PLANT MATERIAL 9. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM a. REMOVAL ALL INVASIVE HERBACEOUS PLANT MATERIAL BY HAND WEEDING OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. I / MECHANICAL WEEDER, Found Spike---------._.,,� 1 Y 4 � �� 1 10. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS I i b. APPLY SPOT APPLICATION OF 2% GLYPHOSATE HERBICIDE (ROUNDUP, RODEO) i 00 THROUGHOUT AREA OF REMOVAL, IN EARLY SPRING OR LATE FALL. GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. % `\ �t ; / I C. FOR REMOVAL OF WOOD INVASIVE SPECIES (BUCI(THORN) REMOVE BY HAND, 63 ENSURE MINIMAL SOIL DISTURBANCE WHERE POSSIBLE, APPLY HERBICIDE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. / \Y H d X00 d. FOR LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CUT STEM AT SOIL SURFACE AND TREAT DIRECTLY Most westerly corner of Lot MH WITH HERBICIDE. 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS\ \ : �' f ,Qo � \ �i9� 3, NO NOT REPLANT AREA FOR 14 DAYS, OR UNTIL HERBICIDE INSTRUCTION SPECIFY, 00 °Q 4 ADDITIONAL HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR UP TO 5 YEARS DEPENDING CITY OF ORONO LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACING BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES AND ANY UTILITY SERVICE THAT IS PROPOSED OR EXISTING AND TO REMAIN. 0� ON ORIGINAL INFESTATION, MONITOR AREA AND SPOT APPLY AS PER PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS. S. GENERALLY, WHEN APPLYING HERBICIDES TO CONTROL WEEDS, LIMIT WORI< TO FALL AND y LATE FALL WHEN NATIVE PLANTS ARE DORMANT. Most souther) corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION -- '---"`` \ o \ 6. HERBICIDES MAY ONLY BE APPLIED BY A TRAINED & LICENSED COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE OF SPRING PARK LOTS \ o� APPLICATOR. G O Oa7HO R ( _E) (�77 R Oo U-9 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LO J co L0 z 711-� z Y Lf') z L0 O LU LU a z V o p z Q OJ L6 J 0� W O N LL] U LU Lu _jQ > C/) CD LLJ Qa— 30 > CC9 (D LU 2 L0 QLizL0 0 J W O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 03/22/17 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 07/19/17 PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW LEGEND 10/18/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/09/17 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 02/20/18 CITY/WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH SEED ZONE A, SEE SPECS. ABOVE 03/09/18 CITY ENGINEERING REVISIONS PATH, SAMPLES REQUIRED; APPROX. 7,420 SF 03/23/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS APPROX. 1,750 SF + +SEED ZONE B, SEE SPECS. ABOVE 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS SOD. APPROX 3,000 SY +'+++'+++ APPROX. 20,215 SF 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS ++++++++, 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS STANDARD BEACH SAND; ENSURE SEED ZONE C, SEE SPECS. ABOVE ,� ;� z LOCAL SUPPLIER, SAMPLES APPROX. 4,000 SF REQUIRED, APPROX, 700 SF PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT REVISION SUMMARY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN DATE DESCRIPTION AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PLANTING SIZES CD DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES PROJECT NO.: 17059 AND PLANTING SIZES LANDSCAPE PLAN GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1 " = 20'-0" L10 10'-0" 0 20'-0" • ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. --929--- I929.4 con tour — ���-------------- I ♦ \ `\ \ x x 9 41 11011 0 f x d7A %,%♦ T 6 _x�"'-cam- - - ,�,♦ `� \ �C It of ,' 7 I � � � � ��-- 932 `♦`�` \�` V -t----- k` b 3 \\%9� \♦ H Top \931.24 x 9 _ 76 k 37 \ \ — Inv. ♦925.80 S rg x 7 k_S contour \ \\ env. \921.24 W IN 2 10 \ �; \\\,\ \937, \ O \\ `, \\\ �t 9 / 4 94i 01\ / ` ` \ �� 6 (x0/05( ` `\\ \ �j� x70 `` `\ 44. 7 C6 x }x i X1009 X 29 \\ \ �♦ Mme' 41j,\ \ 1\ \ \ 414.\ \ II \ `\ ♦��\ ��\ INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT \ 1 \1 \\ ♦ %\2 ` 1 \\ ♦��\ \; FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO \\ ♦� \\ \ \\ + 3 ------------- x _________�r- ` \\ ♦\\ \\ PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF x x 131 �\ 6 \ x�T113\\\ x wrJPr INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT - - - --� I \ \ \ �9�\`\\ x 7 ♦ ``` x 1�� i `\ \ 2 3` / / �`� �•** % I FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO �� PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF �IAs \� x x 4 + � + x 15 �*� TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AAs♦ \� \ ,/ \\` x 17 V6 3 x LA47 \\4 AREA, INSTALL AT EXISTING ,%tip ;. \\\\ \\ `, 423 x 18 x 19 x 21 GRADE, TYP. UPON CONCLUSION ♦, \\ % 1 `\ \ ws + OF USE, RETURN SITE TO �` \ `\ �� x 1 c'o x 22 PREVIOUS CONDITION, \ + \ INCLUDING AERATION OF SOIL, AND RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF + 1 + i\ TURF. s In J26.36Amo \`\ Y ` • \cp 432 \ \ \ Found 1/2" Iron Pipe \ \% 71 \\ ;% 41 ' <1 G Ar* i� �♦,♦ , x 35ZnO 41 tj2e 'j ii 1J d \ \\ \ Z 0 gpruce Spru' a i l G4 jPoplor M 1 I + Cj 4" P for / II IIo 3 6 �' mop/o I / I �� i40 I I / 21 I '� x 5 / � Poplar / x �JJ j 19 I �i 10 10 1 4iF 4#----------- f I - ; ; '� i �t130ATLI INSTRUCTION DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE _-- _ �� / i`-�' `----- . _ ENTRANCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE / i CO BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE33.3 Found Spike fop 932.10 Inv. 92Z20 /(IIA94"44 / \ H yd. Most westerly corner of Lot �•'� \' 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS \\ o° Most southerly corner of Lot / / / / / . Floor G� MH \ UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEMS TO REMAIN OFFLINE UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW -------------------- SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE a —9 R 5— M -SZ: TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA I T 7z- A EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 7n� 4 Ca07H0 SRO�e (�77 m (D n-9 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE I- 0 Lu 0 (3) cY) Lf) L0 0 O LUU Q CD 0 Q0 C'7 LO J co L() z z Y W z 0 a LU 0 z J2i WLr5C-0 >lt N W Lu U) C/) W a 2 TD LLI 2 L0 QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 IPLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 1 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS swi ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 929.4 contour /i —------------ �X / I �%% i7 i ♦ 440 — �; N ` ,� �� H Top\\931. ____ ♦ .r- \ Inv. 49 .80 S �n \ 21.24 W / \ r 10 \\\\ \ \ \\ % \ C \ li� v` o I� ,\ L v N INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF ,% \ i % ,, q�►\\ XX \In �426.36 DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE IN WETLAND. HAND PLACE BIO LOGS ALONG WETLAND EDGE TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE Most westerly corner of Lot 185, TAYLOR'S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS Ftp` '9 q �^ 0� v9 41 ♦ `N ` X93? 100 4111 41 41 19 ♦ `;% \\ 41 \ .� % 'ARY MULCH PAR G�,y� \LL AT EXISTING TYP. t17'ON CONCLUS RETUR ITE TO 1S CONDITI piny--ONST CTION . / ENTRA CE / ;0 is 33.3 / Floor F. SSP GP � 95 O,Q I Spruce INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE AT GRADING LIMITS TO PROTECT SITE FROM RUNOFF IQ %I. ` 3j nd 1/2" Iron Pi[ iI 10�6 UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEMS TO REMAIN OFFLINE UNTIL SITE IS ESTABLISHED, TYP. SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF ORONO. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR LAND DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO INSPECTION. LEGEND: EX. T CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW ■mmm................ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY MULCH PARKING AREA ZIA7 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1!l N 1 " = 30'-0" 15-0" 0 30'-0" (C�OVHO S o 1fl 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE U Lu O (3) cY) Lf) LO O O LUU Q 0 0 Q0 C'7 V Ln J co J Lr) Lr) z Z Y W z 0 LU az O z J W co >lt N W Lu C / ~ W a W z QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 (PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 04/26/18 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY PROJECT NO.: 17059 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS swi ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. "rRFLOW IS/2 OF THE CURB K HEIGHT =RFLOW AT TOP OF I -ER ASSEMBLY .ISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX, ID GRATE .TER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" !-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT IH -FLOW FABRIC NU I tS: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C. CURB INLET FILTER �J NTS uj DIRECTION OF FLOW 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD J T T a TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP MAX. > 35'R Q 0 C N 7 C 0 Lu TO CONSTRUCTION I 00 AREA z C� PLAN 35' R z TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE L x t EXISTING 75' NAINIINAI Inn ...._. FINISHED GRADE PROFILE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED. AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NTS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH � Y � i' 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS INA' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET NTS 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE co FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED ILLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8". 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO - PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. N \X' l CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH �z N SEDIMENT FENCE NTS FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12"O.C. C�' 7H, SR, t �, p Oc n -g 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLE ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL uj DIRECTION OF FLOW J T T a o' METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. > U W O 07 cy) LD LO z O O LuU Q CD CD CO cy) LO J co J LO LO z z Y W z 0 Lu a z Oz J 2i W0 >lt N W Lu U) c~ W< W 2 Ln QN Liz J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 11/09/17 IPLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 04/24/18 1 WATERSHED REVISIONS 06/07/18 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY SWPPP - DETAILS SW1 m2 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 # MNR100001 PAGES 1-35) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP (PART III.A) THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (PART 111.13) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) (PART III.C) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION (PART III.E): THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN PART II.C. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE PART IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III.F.1 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTION MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION PREVENTIONIV.B PART : ( ) THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV.E ARE COMPLIED WITH. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WITH PART IV- C -5 -SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER (AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR) MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEED NOTES (PART III.A,4.A): ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. SEDIMENT CONTROL (PART IV.C): SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. a. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. b. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4, A. THROUGH C. c. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.G. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND THE PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. WHEN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BE OBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. HOWEVER, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. PERMISSION TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE) MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMPS SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEE PART IV.E.4.D.). THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BE LEFT UN -COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN PART III.B. OF THIS PERMIT DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (PART IV.D): DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (PART IV.E): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT. CONTINUE INSPECTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. THIS MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 112 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL. THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. SEE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (PART IV.F): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTI N MANAGEMENT MEASURES 0N THE SITE; SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPGA REGULATIONS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. FUELING OPERATION PLAN: ALL FUELING SHALL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS. SPILL PREVENTION PLAN: ALL SPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY. THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAY ONSITE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES, POSTING CLEAN UP RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL. SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE: SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND SANITARY CONDITION, FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES. A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS. FINAL STABILIZATION (PART IV.G): THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF THE SITE (THAT HAS NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION) TO ANOTHER PARTY. A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION / PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER. THE ORIGINAL CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 1/13/14-1/13/14 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2017 OWNER INFORMATION o N a o LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 265 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 952-653-1359 CONTACT: CURT FRETHAM (C�OVHO sRoge M (�D U [�D 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART III.A.4.B&C): LAKE', W�EST SITE AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING PROPOSED LOT 1 PROPOSED LOT 2 OUTLOTA BUILDI NG COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0°% 4,653 SF 17.5% 7,296 SF 12.2% 0 SF 0.0% DEVELOPMENT, LLC ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 6.1% 1,940 SF 3.2% 2,596 SF 33.2°% ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 20,287 SF 76.4% 50,469 SF 84.5% 5,216 SF 66.8% TOTALSITE AREA 94,080 SF 100.0% 26,563 SF 100.0% 59,705 SF 100.0% 7,812 SF 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION 302 SF 0.3% PROPOSEDCONDITION LOT 6,276 SF 6.7% PROPOSED CONDITION LOT2 9,236 SF 9.8% 0 UTLOT A 2,596 SF 2.8% LOT TOTA L ( LOT 1 + LOT 2) 15,512 SF 16.5% TOTA L ( LOT 1 + LOT 2 + 0 UTLOT A) 18,108 S F 19.2% LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 15,210 SF 16.2% TOTAL DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 17,806 SF 18.9% *All existing impervious area is owned by the adjacent property owner EROSION CONTROLOUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 81,440 SF SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL 2,700 LF EROSION CONTROLBLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±0 EA NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. . r . �CJ\■IWL ��1\ CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE Q PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE: ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING VACANT SITE WITH EXTENSIVE TREE GROWTH INTO A RESIDENTIAL SITE WITH 2 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART III.C. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. 2. POST CONSTRUCTIOMTHE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART III.D. SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE PART III.D.1. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. O M Ln Lf) 2 6 0 OfO LLIU J O O CO C'7 Ln J M J L0 Ln .. z Z Y Wz O Lu �- z O z J 2 W N N W w 0 V♦ ~ W Q W = Lo N L0 Q J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - MaTthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY 'ROJECT NO.: 17059 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1 3 ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT Civilbite G R C7 U P Ift Minnesota Pollution Attachment A: Control Agency J Y 520 Lafayette Road North P SWPPP Site Specific Document St Paul, MIN sslss-4144 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the General, Stormwater Permit: for Construction Activity Doc Type; Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Construction activity Information Project name: IVY PLACE Project location (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) Address or describe area: 3600 IVY PLACE City or Township: ORONO State: MN Zip code: 55391 Latitudellongitude of approximate centroid of project: 44-926034,-93.613450 Method of collection of latutudellongitude: ❑ GPS ❑ Online tool ❑USES Topographic map All cities where construction will occur: ORONO All counties where construction will occur; HENNEPIN All townships where construction will occur: Project size (number of acres to be disturbed): 1.7 Project type: ❑ Residential ❑ Commercialllndustrial ❑ Road construction ❑ Residential and road construction ❑ Other (describe): Cumulative Impervious surface: Existing area of impervious surface: 4.0 (to the nearest tenth acre) Post construction area of impervious surface: 0.4 (to the nearest tenth acre) Total new area of impervious surface: 0.4 (to the nearest tenth acre) Receiving waters TypeI Special water? I Impaired Water?** (dilob, ,pond, wetland, lake, (See Stormwater Permit (See Stormwater Permit Water bodv ID* I Name of water I I I n Yes i-1 No I n Yes i-1 No I I I [-]Yes [-]No I -]Yes ❑ No ' Water Bodyfdantrffeaflon iD might not be avadabfe for all water bodies. Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search Toot af: f 1 9 p p www nca.state rnn usJwareristo m�vater/stornwafcr-r..htm1 Impaired water for the following poflutant(s) or sfrewor(s#: phosphorus, turhhiify, dfwofved oxygen, or bloftc impairment. www. pca.state. mn.as - 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 - TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-557-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 - 4113J09&8116113 Page 1 of 7 Cbite G R go U P - Dates of construction (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) Construction start date: 04/0112018 Estimated completion date: 0410 1 12 0 1 9 General Construction Project Information Describe the construction activity (what will be built, general timeline, etc): THE PROJECT WILL BE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON A EXISTING VACANT SiTE. Describe soil types found at the project: THE EXISTING SOILS AT THE SiTE ARE PRIMARILY SANDY LEAN CLAYS. Site Location map - Attach maps (U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle, National Wetland inventory maps or equivalent) showing the location and type of all receiving waters, including wetlands, drainage ditches, stormwater ponds or basins, etc. that will receive runoff from the project. Use arrows showing the direction of flaw and distance to the water body t P .. * CARMAN 1 BAY • _ 0 ;e. �t0///��� •' T F LT www,pca.state.mn_us 651-Z96-6300 - 800.657.3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-557-3SfA Avaitabte in alternative formats wq•strrn2-12 - 41131 d9 & 8116113 Page 2 of 7 11S1te G R C3 U P - General Site Information (Ill.b) 1. Describe the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). Include the timing for installation and procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary. IILA.4..a THE PROJECT WILL BE PROTECTED BY TWO (2) MAIN BMP S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED. 2. Attach to this SWPPP a table with the anticipated quantities for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (111. A. 4.b) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. Attach to this SWPPP a site map that includes the following features (III.A.3.b - f): + Existing and final grades, including dividing lines and direction of tow for all pre and post -construction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. • Locations of impervious surfaces and soil types. ■ Locations of areas not to be disturbed. • Location of areas of phased construction ■ All surface waters and existing wetlands within one mile from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater runoff from the site (identifiable on maps such as USES 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent). Where surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. Methods to be used for final stabilization of all exposed soil areas. 4. Were stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an environmental, archaeological, or other required local, state, or federal review of the project? ❑ Yes M No If yes, describe how these measures were addressed in the SWPPP. (III.A,6.) NIA 5. Is the project located in a karst area such that additional measures would be necessary to protect drinking water supply management areas as described in Minn. R. chapters 7050 and 7060? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the additional measures to be used. (III.A.7.) NIA 6. Does the site discharge to a calcareous fen listed in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 6.b.? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, a letter of approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources must be obtained prior to application for this permit. (Part I S.6 and Part II 1,A- 8) 7. Does the site discharge to a water that Is listed as impaired for the following pollutants) or stressor(s): phosphorus, turbidity, dissolved oxygen or biotic impairment? Use the Special and Impaired Waters Search Tool at: www.pca.state.mn.uslwaterlstormwaterlston,nwater-e.htmi. ❑ Yes M No If no, skip to Training. Does the impaired water have an approved Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) with an Approved Waste Load Allocation for construction activity? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes: a. List the receiving water, the areas of the site discharging to it, and the pollutant(s) identified in the TMDL. b. List the BMPs and any other specific construction stormwater related Implementation activities identified in the TMDL. If the site has a discharge point within one mile of the impaired water and the water flows to the impaired water but no specific BMPs for construction are identified in the TMDL, the additional BMPs in Appendix A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4 -trout stream)) must be added to the SWPPP and implemented. (IIi.A.7), The additional BMPs only apply to those portions of the project that drain to one of the identified discharge points. www,Pc ma.state.n.us - 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3864 - TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-5trm2.12 - 4113)09 & 8116113 Page 3 of 7 ivilSite Cs R O U P - NIA 9. Identify adjacent public waters where the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has declared `work in water restrictions" during fish spawning timeframes N/A Selection of a Permanent Stormwater Management System (III.D.) GO vilSite G R C} U P - 5, Describe Methods to be used far -energy dissipation at pipe outlets (e.g„ rip rap, splash pads, gabions, etc. RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS. 6. Describe Methods to be used to promote infiltration and sediment removal on the site prior to offsite discharge, unless infeasible (e.g., direct stormwater flow to vegetated areas): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE tJTiLZED. T For drainage ordiversion ditches. describa practices to stabilize the nom l wettedperimeterwithin 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to surface water. The last 200 lineal feet must be stabilized within 24 hours after connecting to surface waters and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased for all discharges to Special, Impaired or "work in water restrictions". All other remaining portions of the temporary or permanent ditches or sweles within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water, property edge and construction in that area has temporarily or permanently ceased. NIA - NO DITCHES ON SITE S. Describe additional erosion prevention measures that will be implemented at the site during construction (e.g., construction phasing, minimizing soil disturbance, vegetative buffers, horizontal slope grading, slope draining/terracing, etc,): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE, 9. If appllcable, include additional requirements in Appendix A Part C.3 regarding maintaining a 100 -foot buffer zone or installing redundant BMPs for portions of the site that drain to special waters). N/A 10. If applicable, describe additional erosion prevention BMPs to be implemented at the site to protect planned infiltration areas MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREA. Seditment Control Practices (IV.Q Describe the methods of sediment control BMPs to be implemented at this site during construction to minimize sediment impacts to surface waters, including curb and gutter systems 1. Describe Methods to be used for down gradient perimeter control: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. 2. Describe Methods to he used to contain soil stockpiles: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY. 3. Describe Methods to be used for storm drain inlet protection. SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS. 4. Describe Methods to minimize vehicle tracking at construction exits and street sweeping activities: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. S. Describe Methods, If applicable, additional sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to be installed to keep runoff away from planned infiltration areas when excavated prior to final stabilization of the contributing drainage area: INFILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 6, Describe methods to be used to minimize soil compaction and preserve top soil (unless infeasible) at this site: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED. 7. Describe pians to preserve a 50 -foot natural buffer between the project's soil disturbance and a surface water or pians for redundant sediment controls if a buffer is infeasible: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. THIS PROJECT WILL DISTURB WITHIN WETLANDS BUT WILL WORK TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS 8. Describe plans for use of sedimentation treatment chemicals (e.g., polymers, flocculants, etc.) see Part IV,C.10 of the permit: NIA IS1te G R 4 U P - Pollution Prevention Management Measures (iV.F) 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides insecticides fertilizers treatment chemical and landscape materials: P li P p ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PRiIDVIDER. 6, Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE. 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE, Final Stabilization (IV,G) 1. Describe method of final stabilization (permanent cover) of all disturbed areas: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACOMPLISHED WiTH PAVEMENT. SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS 2, Describe procedures for completing final stabilization and terminating permit coverage (see Part IV,G.1-5): UPON FINAL STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. Documentation of infeasibility: (If Applicable) www.pca.state,mn_us 651-276-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651 282-5332 or 800 557 3864 Available in alternative formats www, pca. state. mn.us 651.296-6300 800.657.3864 TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657-3864 AvaitatAe in alternative formats wq•strm2-12 - 4113109&8116113 Page 5 of 7 wq-strm2.12 411.3109 & 81161 f3 Page 7 of 7 ivilS to G R C} U P - 9, Is the project required to install a temporary sediment basin due to 10 or more acres draining to a common location or 5 acres or more if the site is within 1 mile of a special or impaired water? ❑ Yes Z No If yes, describe (or attach plans ) showing how the basin will be designed and constructed in accordance with Part III.0 of the permit. N/A (Ca07H0 sRote M o U p 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 LAKE, IIIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1. Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal to one acre? L]Yes ® No Dewatering and basin Draining (iV.D) If yes, a water quality volume of one inch of runoff from the cumulative new impervious surfaces must be retained on site (see 1. Will the project includs dewatering or basin draining? ❑ Yds M No IU Part IIID of the permit) through Infiltration unless prohibited due to one of the reasons in Part 111-0.1.j_ If infiltration is prohibited If yes, describe measures to be used to treatldispose of turbid or sediment -laden water and method to prevent erosion or identify other method of other volume reduction (e.g.. filtration system, wet sedimentation basin, regional ponding or scour of discharge points (see Part IV. D of the permit): 0 equivalent method 2. Describe which method will be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project (III.D): • Wet sedimentation basin • Infiltration/Filtration Regional ponds + Combination of practices Include all calculations and design information for the method selected. See Part IIID of the permit for specific requirements associated with each method. I N Fi LTRATI O NIF I LTfiAT ION Calculations are within the Site Storm Water Management Report and part of this SWPPP as Attachment D. 3. If it is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, describe why. This can include proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any permanent stormwater management practices. Describe what other treatment, such as grasses swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, will be implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters. (III.C) IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. 4. For projects that discharge to trout streams, including tributaries to trout streams, identify method of incorporating temperature controls into the permanent stormwater management system. NIA Erosion Prevention Practices (IV,B) Describe the types of temporary erosion prevention BMPs expected to be implemented on this site during construction: 1. Describe construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to minimize erosion. Delineate areas not to be disturbed (e.g., with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE. 2. Describe Methods of temporarily stabilizing soils and soil stockpiles (e.g., mulches, hydraulic tackifiers, erosion blankets, etc.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 3. Describe Methods of dissipating velocity along stormwater conveyance channels and at channel outlets (e.g., check dams, sediment traps, rip rap, etc.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL OUTLETS. 4. Describe Methods to be used for stabilization of ditch and swale wetted perimeters (Note that mulch, hydraulic soil tackifiers, hydromulches, etc. are not acceptable soil stabilization methods for any part of a drainage ditch or swaie) FINAL STABILLZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD. www. pca. state. mn. Lis 651-296-6300 - 800-657-3854 - TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2.12 - 4113109&8116113 Page 4 of 7 2, Will the project include use of filters for backwash water? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe how filter backwash water will be managed on the site or properly disposed (see Part II1.D.3. of the permit): Additional BMPs for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands (Appendix A, Parts C and D) 1. Special Waters. Does your project discharge to special waters? []Yes ❑ No 2. If proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices, then other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. Describe what other treatment will be provided. N/A 3, Describe erosion and sediment controls for exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope to a special waters, and temporary sediment basins for areas that drain five or more acres disturbed at one time_ 4. Describe the undisturbed buffer zone to be used (not less than 100 linear feet from the special water). 5. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will ensure that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. N/A 6. Describe how the permanent stormwater management system will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting in the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events. N/A 7. Wetlands. Does your project discharge stormwater with the potential for significant adverse Impacts to a wetland (e.g., conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond)? ❑ Yes Z No If Yes, describe the wetland mitigation sequence that will be followed in accordance with Part D of Appendix A. N/A inspections and Maintenance (iV.E) Describe procedures to routinely inspect the construction site: * Once every seven (7) days during active construction and, Within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours, and within seven (7) days after that. Inspections must include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, and infiltration areas. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION 3TORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST" www.pca.state.mn_us • 651-295-6300 - 800-657.3864 TTY 651-252.5332 or 800-557-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2.12 • 4113109 & 81161 f 3 Page 6 of 7 M C) L0 L0 2 O 0 O U Q CD CD Q0 co LO J co J to LID ■+ Z 2i Z Y W z 2 ° 0 z Z O J 2i W to N W LU C W a 30 W z L0 QN L0 J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Mathew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY 'ROJECT NO.: 17059 SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP I� ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 52011.4feyette Road Noah SL Paul, MN 5515SA194 CivilSite G R O U P ATTACHMENT B: Construction Stormwater Inspection Checklist Construction Stormwater Program Doc Type Permitting Checklist Note: This inspection report does not address all aspects of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater permit (Permit) issued on August 1, 2013. The completion of this checklist does not guarantee that all permit requirements are in compliance; it is the responsibility of the Permittee(s) to read and understand the permit requirements. Facility Information Site name: Facility address: Permit number: City: State: Zip code: Inspection Information Inspector name: Phone number: Date (mnVdd/yyyy): Time: ❑ am ❑ pm Is the inspector certified in sediment and erosion control and it is documented in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this inspection routine or in response to a storm event: Rainfall amount (if applicable): Is site within one aerial mile of special or impaired water? ❑ Yes []No If yes, follow Appendix A and other applicable permit requirements. Note: If NA is selected at anytime, specify why in the comment area for that section. Erosion Control Requirement (Part IV.B) Yes I No I NA 2. Has the need to disturb steep slopes been minimized? 171 0 1 11 3. All ditches stabilized 200' back from point of discharge within 24 hours? Not mulch ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are there erosion BM P's for onsite stockpiles? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Are aDDrooriate BM P's installed Drotectina inletstoutlets? n n n www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 1 of 4 �Cv1J iSite G R O U P 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part W.C.) CivilSite G R O U P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? ❑ L1 L1 3. Does on-site fueling only occur in a contained area? ❑ 13 El 4. Are all solid wastes being properly disposed of? ❑ 11 ❑ 5. Is the concrete washout area connDletely contained? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: 7. Were any discharges seen during this inspection, sediment, water, or otherwise? []Yes ❑ No If yes, state the exact location of all points of discharge. Photograph the discharge and describe the discharge (color, odor, foam, oil sheen, etc). How will it be removed? How did the discharge happen? How much was discharged? How will it be stopped, and how long will it take to stop? Is the discharge going into an adjacent site? Was the discharge a sediment delta? If yes, will the delta be recovered within 7 days? 8. Will a permanent storrnroater management system be utilized in this project as required and in accordance with Part IIID of the permit? Describe: 9. Is any dewatering occurring on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, where? What BMP is being used? How much water is being dewatered? Is the water clear? Where is the water being discharged to? 10. Is a copy of the SWPPP located on the construction site? []Yes ❑ No 11. Has the SWPPP been followed and implemented on site? ❑ Yes []No 12. Is a sedimentation basin required for this project as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, are they maintained as specified in the permit? []Yes ❑ No 13. Is the topsoil on this project being preserved? []Yes ❑No If yes, explain how the topsoil is being preserved. If not, explain why it was infeasible. 14. Are all infiltration systems marked to avoid compaction? ❑ Yes ❑ No Do all infiltration areas have pretreatment devices? ❑ Yes ❑ No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 3 of 4 Civil Site G R O U P 15. Description of areas of non-compliance noted during the inspection, required corrective actions, and recommended date of completion of corrective actions: 16. Proposed amendments to the SWPPP: Yes I No I NA 17. Potential areas of future concern: 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? ❑ ❑ ❑ If No, have redundant sediment controls been installed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Vehicle tracking Best Management Practices BMPs at all site exits? I ❑ I ❑ I El 6. All tracked sediment removed within 24 hours? I ❑ I ❑ I ❑ 8. Are all infiltration areas Drotected with a Dretreatment device? 1 ❑ 1 ❑ 1 ❑ Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs (Part IV.E.) Comments: Other Yes I No 1. Are all materials that can leach Dollutants under cover? I ❑ I ❑ I ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 , 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemative formats wq-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 2of4 18. Additional comments: Disclosures: • After discovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more extensivelmore location specific inspection requirements. • The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMP's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part 11.6.5., or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the MPCA. www.pca.state.mn.us , 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats %q-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM CivilSite G R 4c), U P ATTACHMENT C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. All stormwater retention, detention and treatment basins must be inspected at least once a year to determine that basin retention and treatment characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by 50 percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one year of the inspection date. 2. All grit chambers, sump catch basins, sump manholes, outlet structures, culverts, outfall structures and other stormwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. Within 30 days of the inspection date, all accumulated sediment and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage areas must be kept clear of litter and vegetative debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways kept clear, inlet areas kept clean, and undesirable vegetation removed. Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the facilities, if any, will be corrected, and any structural damage impairing or threatening to impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 00C,�' 7� R9�, (Z IC Co C C 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be Yes No I NA 1. Are all previously stabilized areas maintaining 90% ground cover? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Perimeter Control -Has sediment reached one half the height of the device? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Are inlet protection devices maintained and functioning ro erl ? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: Other Yes I No 1. Are all materials that can leach Dollutants under cover? I ❑ I ❑ I ❑ www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 , 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemative formats wq-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 2of4 18. Additional comments: Disclosures: • After discovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more extensivelmore location specific inspection requirements. • The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMP's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part 11.6.5., or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the MPCA. www.pca.state.mn.us , 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats %q-strm2-36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM CivilSite G R 4c), U P ATTACHMENT C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. All stormwater retention, detention and treatment basins must be inspected at least once a year to determine that basin retention and treatment characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by 50 percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one year of the inspection date. 2. All grit chambers, sump catch basins, sump manholes, outlet structures, culverts, outfall structures and other stormwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. Within 30 days of the inspection date, all accumulated sediment and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage areas must be kept clear of litter and vegetative debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways kept clear, inlet areas kept clean, and undesirable vegetation removed. Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the facilities, if any, will be corrected, and any structural damage impairing or threatening to impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 00C,�' 7� R9�, (Z IC Co C C 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek 763-213-3944 Pat Sarver 952-250-2003 LAKE', IIIA DEVELOPMENT. LLC 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be inspected every three months during the operational period (between spring snowmelt and first substantial snowfall) and monitored after rainfall events of 1 J LO f- inch or more to ensure that the contributing drainage area is clear of litter and J LO debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways are clear, inlet areas are clean, LO undesirable vegetation is removed and there is no erosion impairing or " Z threatening to impair the function of a facility. If sediment has accumulated in a infiltration feature, within 30 days of inspection deposited sediments must be Z Y removed, the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils must be restored, and M L0 W Z any surface disturbance must be stabilized. Inspection must ensure that L0 O sediment traps and forebays are trapping sediment and that more than 50 LU Z LLJ V z p Z Z Q O J J of W coN O CivilSite W Q w G R 43 U P U) percent of the storage volume remains, the contributing drainage area is stable liiiiiiiiiir. i CIO (i.e., no erosion is observed), and inlets and outlet/overflow spillways are in - O W �- Q good conditions with no erosion. Maintenance techniques used must protect O the infiltration capacity of the practice by limiting soil compaction to the co greatest extent possible (e.g., by using low -impact earth -moving equipment). (� W = 4. Underground storage chambers must be inspected at least once a LO year to ensure that adequate storage capacity remains. Capacity will be LO considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the storage volume by 50 J percent of its original design volume. Accumulated debris and sediment will be w removed, and inlet and outlet structures will be cleared of any flow p impediments. d F_. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - Matthew R. Pavek DATE 06/07/18 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION 06/07/18 1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISION SUMMARY 'ROJECT NO.: 17059 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 5 ■ ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) IVYPLACE PROJECT NO.17--3962 FINAL PLAT CASE # LA18-000014 AGREEMENT dated June 11, 2018, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"); and LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for "IVY PLACE" (referred to in this Contract as the "Plat"). The land to be subdivided by the Plat (the "Land") is situated in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit A. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the Plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract and furnish the security required by it. The City will cause the Plat to be duly recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, promptly after compliance by the Developer with all conditions Ivy Place Development Contract precedent to such recording pursuant to this Contract, which conditions precedent the Developer shall cause to be satisfied within 180 days after the City Council approves the final Plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Land, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary "security" (defined below) has been received by the City, and 3) the Plat has been duly recorded in the office of said Registrar of Titles. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. N/A 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. N/A 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the Land unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract with respect to property which did not receive final plat approval prior to any such amendment. 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Land shall be developed in accordance with the following plans (collectively, the "Plans"). The Plans shall not be attached to this Contract. The erosion control plan may also be approved by Hennepin County Environmental Services and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If the Plans vary from the terms of this Contract, the terms of this Contract shall control. The Plans are: 2 Ivy Place Development Contract Plan A — Plat of Ivy Place Plan B - Grading and Erosion Control Plan Plan C —Landscape Plan Plan D — Wetland Impact and Buffer Plan Plan E — SWPPP Plan Plan F — Conservation Design Report and Master Plan Plan G — Tree Preservation Plan 8. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built in accordance with the approved Plans (the "Improvements"): A. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control B. Setting of Iron Monuments C. Surveying and Staking D. Stormwater Management Facilities The Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances including those concerning erosion and drainage and any prohibiting grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work as the City may reasonably determine. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or its 3 Ivy Place Development Contract engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Improvements and before the "security" is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" Plans, and an electronic file of the "as constructed" Plans in an Auto CAD file based upon the Hennepin County coordinate system, all prepared in accordance with City standards. 9. IRON MONUMENTS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 505.021 and the Orono City Code, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the "security" is released. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 10. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to the following to the extent required: • DNR for Dewatering • City of Orono for Building Permits • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for erosion control permit and storm water management permit • NPDES Permits (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems) issued by MPCA 11. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors' and subcontractors' responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 4 Ivy Place Development Contract 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all Improvements as contemplated by Section 8 and the approved Plans by December 31, 2019, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on private drive. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Land to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with development of the Land. 14. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the storm water pollution prevention plan, and the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within five (5) days after the completion of the work, weather permitting, or in an area that is inactive for more than ten (10) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the "security" to pay any costs. No development, utility or street 5 Ivy Place Development Contract construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Land is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 15. GRADING PLAN. Building permits shall be based on the approved grading and erosion control plan, though actual grading will be completed by the property owners at the time of building construction. This approved grading plan will establish the Engineered Grade for the project, as defined by city code. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Developer certifies to the City that all lots with house footings placed on fill will have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed FHA/HUD 79G specifications. 16. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Land, the Developer shall comply with all recommendations of the City staff and City Engineer regarding site cleanup and restoration, including but not limited to contaminated soil removal, junk and debris removal, etc. Also, prior to any construction on the Land, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 17. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the Improvements, the City shall inspect the Improvements and notify Developer if any of the Improvements do not conform to the requirements of this Contract. 18. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and 6 Ivy Place Development Contract acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in the "security." Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates. These fees shall be billed monthly. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall deposit $7,500. cash with the City ("Escrow"). All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs (including, but not limited to, planning, engineering oversight, or legal consultant review) the City has incurred or will incur related to the Development and for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred or will incur to assure that the work is completed in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and the provisions of Orono City Code Chapter 79. The Escrow may also be used by the City to eliminate any hazardous conditions associated with the work and to repair any damage to public property or infrastructure that is caused by the work associated with this Agreement, if compliance with the terms of this Agreement are not accomplished. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn send a bill to the Developer. The Developer shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Developer's receipt of bill. In the event that the Developer does not make payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in this Section, the City may immediately draw from the escrow account without further approval of the Developer to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred. If the balance of the escrow account is insufficient to reimburse the City its costs under this Section, the Developer will promptly reimburse the City any additional costs. If the eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow and are not promptly reimbursed by the Developer, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. 7 Ivy Place Development Contract Stat. §§ 415.01 and 366.012. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the Developer when the Development has been completed and written notification is received from the Developer requesting the funds. 20. STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE. The Land is subject to the standard Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee for two new 1/2 -acre lots at $3,025.00 per lot. $3,025.00 per lot x 2 lots = $6,050.00 21. PURPOSELY LEFT BLANK 22. PURPOSELY LEFT BLANK 23. SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION CHARGES. The Land was fully assessed for municipal sewer in 1965. The Metropolitan Council SAC charge of $2,485.00 per dwelling unit is owed. City water was installed in 1970 and the Land was assessed for one dwelling. When a building permit is issued for a second dwelling on the Land, a water connection charge will be due pursuant to City Code and the applicable Fee Schedule. The 2018 fee is $4,240.00. 24. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to development of the Land: A. Implementation of and adherence to the findings and conditions listed in (1) Resolution No. 6789 approving the Preliminary Plat for Ivy Place File No. 17-3962, adopted by the Orono City Council on September 11, 2017; (2) Resolution No. approving the Final Plat for Ivy Place, adopted by the Orono City Council on June 11, 2018; (3) Resolution 6821 approving wetland setback variance; CUP for filling in floodplain; and watershed wetland buffer variance. C. Final Plat approval is subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") approval and permits as required. The City will not approve the Plat until the MCWD 8 Ivy Place Development Contract has approved the stormwater management plans and the Developer has provided evidence that all required MCWD permits have been obtained. D. The Plat shall adhere to the purpose and intent of the Orono Community Management Plan, as amended. E. The Developer shall construct a private driveway on the Land to provide access to all lots. The private driveway may be designed to preserve existing vegetation, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. G. All of the proposed lots must contain suitable area meeting all established setback requirements to allow the construction of single family residences. H. Prior to City Council approval of the final Plat, the Developer shall furnish a boundary survey of the Land with all property corner monumentation of the Land in place and marked with lath and a flag. Any encroachments on or adjacent to the Land shall be noted on the survey. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. I. The Developer shall pay to the city engineer the amounts incurred for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading. J. The Developer shall submit the final Plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be Auto CAD file. The Developer shall also submit two complete sets of the Plat on Mylar (one copy for the City's records and one copy for recording with Hennepin County). The Developer shall also provide one copy reduced to F = 200'. K. Parking Restriction. Developer shall inform contractors and enforce parking restrictions on Ivy Place and the drive area of 3560 Ivy Place required by the development. No Parking is permitted on Ivy Place at any time. 9 Ivy Place Development Contract L. Stormwater Easement. Developer shall show on the final plat an easement over the planned stormwater facility improvements. M. The Final Plat will dedicate to the City a drainage and utility easement over all existing City utilities on the Land. Alternatively, before the City signs the Plat, the Developer shall provide the City with an appropriately executed drainage and utilities easement, in recordable form, over all existing City utilities on the Land. N. Orono Resolution 6821 contained a number of conditions applicable to the development of the project: a. Final plat approval b. Approval for all permits related to the MCWD c. Applicant shall receive approval from the DNR Commission prior to received land alteration permit d. WCA Approval e. No parking on Ivy Place at any time f. Beach Improvements stall be limited to the project scope. g. A review of the road condition must be done before and after construction, any damage will be repaired by developer. h. Hauling hours are limited to 7:30-3:00pm and 4:00pm-8:00pm while Westonka schools are in session. i. Application shall confirm the location of the delineated wetland before install of the driveway O. Orono Public works will inspect the condition of Ivy Place prior to construction and any damage observed during the course of development of the project, including house construction will be repaired at the Developers expense. 25. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of the costs of all Improvements and construction of all Improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached 10 Ivy Place Development Contract hereto (the "security"), from a bank for 150% of the cost of the Improvements, including any required landscaping. The following is a summary of the security requirements due under this Contract, which must be in place at the time of silt fence inspection and prior to any other site improvements. Item Est. 150% Stormwater Management $ - $ - Erosion Control $ 9,000.00 $ 13,500.00 Private Drive $ 27,036.00 $ 40,554.00 Grading $ - $ - Total Security $ 36,036.00 $ 54,054.00 The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, upon five (5) business days' prior written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts necessary to cure the default. If the Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer, and approved by City's Engineer, shall be retained as security until all Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" Plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 11 Ivy Place Development Contract 26. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS AND FEES. The following is a summary of the cash requirements and fees due under this Contract, which must be paid in cash at the time of final plat approval and execution of this Contract by the City: Engineering, City Administration (escrow) $ 7,500.00 Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee 6,050.00 Final Plat Fee 500.00 Subtotal Total Cash Requirements & Fees $14,050.00 Payment made February 22, 2018 $ 700.00 Total Cash Requirements & Fees $13,350.00 27. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Improvements against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by the City Council. The one year warranty period on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed and accepted by the City Council as documented in official City minutes. The Developer shall post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit (the "Maintenance Security") in an amount reasonably determined by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall examine the condition of the Improvements when determining the amount of the Maintenance Security. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security until the Maintenance Security is furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. 28. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Land, including but not limited 12 Ivy Place Development Contract to Hennepin County Environmental Services and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Land. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Plat approval and development of the Land. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the Land, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt development and construction of the Land until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges as required by City ordinance or via other agencies for which City acts as agent may be 13 Ivy Place Development Contract imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer access charges ("SAC"), City water access charges and building permit fees. 29. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the Land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part against any portion of the Land owned by the Developer or any successor in interest to the Developer. 30. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Land until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. Contract. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including those for lots sold to third parties. 14 Ivy Place Development Contract D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Contract. E. Purposely left blank F. If building permits are issued prior to the completion of all Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Improvements and damage to Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with at least one lift of bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer in writing. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the Land and may be recorded against the Land. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Land and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Land; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Land; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, 15 Ivy Place Development Contract available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots in the Plat, the Land, or any part of it. Upon request, the City shall provide, in recordable form, a release of any lot in the Plat from this Development Contract if the City determines that the terms and conditions of this Contract have been satisfied. K. Developer shall be responsible for all snow removal from vacant lots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. L. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls required to be constructed by the Plans, or special conditions referred to in this Contract, shall be constructed before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 31. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345- 16 Ivy Place Development Contract 5534. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Orono City Hall, 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota 55356. Either party may change the address to which notices to such party thereafter shall be given, by providing to the other party notice of such change. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.] 17 Ivy Place Development Contract CITY: CITY OF ORONO wo (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Dennis Walsh, Mayor Dustin Rief, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018 by Dennis Walsh and by Dustin Rief, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 18 Ivy Place Development Contract DEVELOPER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Curt Fretham, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Curt Fretham, the Manager of Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of the company. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 19 Ivy Place Development Contract FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Rick Lupient and Barbara Lupient, individuals, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by it. Dated this day of , 2018. Rick Lupient Barbara Lupient STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Rick Lupient and Barbara Lupient, individuals. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 ABS 20 Ivy Place Development Contract Exhibit A Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 21 Ivy Place Development Contract (Reserved for recording information) DECLARATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 11th day of June, 2018, by and between LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter collectively called the "Developer", and the CITY OF ORONO, Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City". RECITALS WHEREAS, the Landowner is the owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the Landowner is proceeding to build on and develop the Property; and WHEREAS, the Landowner has granted to the City a drainage and utility easement over a portion of the Property (the "Easement Area") legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the development plans for the Property, hereinafter called the "Plans" and attached hereto as Exhibit C, as approved by the City, provide for detention/retention of stormwater within the confines of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City require on-site stormwater management facilities be constructed to provide permanent provisions for handling of storm runoff, including provisions for operation and maintenance of all stormwater runoff facilities and ponds ("Stormwater Facilities") , WHEREAS, said Stormwater Facilities are to be adequately maintained by the Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns; and Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement WHEREAS, the parites agree that such provisions are to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded in the real estate records. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual covenants contained herein, and the following terms and conditions, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Stormwater Facilities shall be constructed by the Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, in accordance with the plans and specifications identified in the Plans. 2. The Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall adequately maintain the Stormwater Facilities in accordance with their Stormwater Maintenance Plan and the City engineering standards for stormwater treatment facilities attached hereto as Exhibit C. This includes all pipes, channels, and other conveyances built to convey stormwater to the facility, as well as all structures, improvements, and vegetation provided to control the quantity and quality of the stormwater. Adequate maintenance is herein defined as good working condition so that these facilities are performing their design functions. 3. The Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall inspect the Stormwater Facilities and submit an inspection report annually and shall be responsible for the payment of any associated costs. The purpose of the inspection is to assure safe and proper functioning of the facilities. The inspection shall cover the entire facilities, berms, outlet structure, pond areas, access roads, buffers, etc. Deficiencies shall be noted in the inspection report. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if it is not compliant with all requirements of the approved Plans and City engineering standards set forth in Exhibit C. 4. The Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby grant permission to the City, its authorized agents and employees, to enter upon the Property and to inspect the stormwater management facilities whenever the City deems necessary. The City shall provide the Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, copies of the inspection findings and a directive to commence with the repairs if necessary ("Inspection Report"). 5. In the event the Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, fails to maintain the Stormwater Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City and such failure continues for sixty (60) days after the City gives the Landowner written notice of such failure, the City may enter upon the Property and take whatever steps necessary, including excavation and the storage of materials and equipment, to correct deficiencies identified in the Inspection Report. The City's notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. The City may charge the costs, including assessing the city's costs to the landowner's property taxes of such repairs, to the Landowner, its successors and assigns. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of permanent nature on the land of the Landowner outside of the Easement Area for the Stormwater Facilities. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said Stormwater Facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. In addition, Landowner agrees that they are, and will be, solely responsible to address complaints and legal claims brought by any third party with regard to the maintenance and operation and the consequences there from the Stormwater Facilities. The Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement Landowner expressly agrees to defend and hold the city harmless from any such third -party claim. 6. Landowner hereby grants to the City, its successors and assigns, a permanent non- exclusive easement for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the Stormwater Facilities pursuant to the terms of this Agreement over, on, across, under and through the Easement Area. The easement shall include the rights, but not the obligation, of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said private Stormwater Facilities together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Easement Area, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said private Stormwater Facilities systems. 7. The Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, will perform the work necessary to keep these Stormwater Facilities in good working order as appropriate. In the event a maintenance schedule for the Stormwater Facilities (including sediment removal) is outlined on the approved Plans and/or Inspection Report, the schedule will be followed and comply with all federal, state, and local regulations relating to the disposal of material. 8. In the event the City, pursuant to this Agreement, performs work of any nature, or expends any funds in performance of said work for labor, use of equipment, supplies, materials, and the like, the Landowner, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall reimburse the City upon demand, within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof for all actual costs incurred by the City hereunder. 9. This Agreement imposes no liability of any kind whatsoever on the City. The Landowner hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the Landowner or the Landowner's agents or employee's negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Landowner to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Landowner shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Landowner's required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts. 10. This Agreement shall be recorded among the land records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land, and shall be binding on the Landowner, their administrators, executors, assigns, heirs and any other successors in interests. Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement DEVELOPER: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC By Curt Fretham, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Curt Fretham, the Manager of Lake West Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of the company. Notary Public Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement CITY: CITY OF ORONO (SEAL) 1.2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Dennis Walsh, Mayor Dustin Rief, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018 by Dennis Walsh and by Dustin Rief, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 ABS Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Ivy Place, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Easement Area Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement EXHIBIT C Plans Ivy Place Stormwater Agreement CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b789 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR IVY PLACE FILE NO. 17-3962 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2011, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick (Barbara) Lupient ("Applicant[s]"), applied for a preliminary plat for the property legally described as: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on August 21, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested preliminary plat as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3962. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1C Zoning District. 3. The property is guided for Low -Medium Density Residential in the 2030 Community Management Plan. I CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 67 8 9 4. The Property contains 2.16 acres in area and has a defined lot width of over 200 feet. 5. The property will be served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. 6. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 7. The 3 parcels will be subdivided into 2 buildable lots and 1 outlot. The outlot will be used for access, consistent with the requirements of Section 82-256 regarding frontiback lot divisions. The two buildable lots will conform to the requirements of the zoning district related to lot area and width, and both lots provide adequate building sites within the required front, side, rear, lake yard, and average lake yard setbacks. 8. The Developer has prepared grading plans to manage stormwater on site without negatively impacted adjacent parcels 9. Access to the property is via the northern extension of Ivy Place, a public road, and via a private easement through 3560 Ivy Place, a private occupied residence. 10. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed subdivision upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. 11. The Parks, Trails and Open Space element of the Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) has no current plans for parks that specifically require dedication of park land from this property. The City will confirm the park dedication required at the time of final plat. 12. The developer has submitted a Conservation Design Report and Master Plan prepared by Anderson Engineering dated July 17, 2017 that inventories and describes in detail the environmental features of the site, defining what natural values of the site should be preserved or enhanced and how that should occur. In general, the site is a point into Lake Minnetonka, and a number of low quality volunteer trees have emerged. The site is very flat, and not much higher than Lake Minnetonka, requiring special care in building construction. A preliminary landscape plan has been developed to introduce high quality planting to the site. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b789 13. The site is surrounded by a lineal wetland adjacent to the waterfront. A small wetland (approximately 168 sq ft) also exists inland. The inland wetland is proposed to be mitigated with the approval of the Watershed District, and the lineal one is proposed to remain, though minor encroachment of the wetland buffer is proposed, subsequent to Watershed District approval for access. 14. A number of easements impact the property, including a. Utility Easement, Document Nos. 855727 and 862192. This is the sanitary sewer easement granted to the City when the sewer lines serving this area were installed in 1966. The easement as described does not appear to match the actual location of the sewer lines. Applicants indicate these easements will be vacated and new ones over the actual pipe location will be granted. b. Drainage and Shore Stabilization Easement, Document No.T5010662. This is an easement granted to the City in 2012 to allow the restoration of shoreline over the existing sewer lines where the shore had eroded over time. This easement will remain in place. c. Private Driveway Easement, Document No. 1023891. This easement was created in 1972 as part of the platting of the three lots to provide access to all three. The easement includes a private cul-de-sac. The easement will be vacated. d. Perpetual Roadway Easement (over 3560 Ivy Place), Document No. 922012. This is an easement granted in 1968 over the adjacent lot owned by the White's at 3560 Ivy Place. This easement will remain in place. e. Utility Easement (over 3560 Ivy Place), Document No. 855726. This is a perpetual underground utility easement granted to the City over 3560 Ivy Place in August 1966. Unknown at this time whether this easement remains in effect given the easement granted in 862191. f. Utility Easement (over 3560 Ivy Place), Document No. 862191. This is a perpetual underground utility easement granted to the City in October 1966, believed to be a replacement or correction of the easement granted in August 1966. g. View Easement, Document No. 1160211. In addition to the defined easements within or adjacent to the property, there is a view easement of record in favor of the Powell property at 2916 Casco Point Road, which limits the number, location and height of the homes allowed within Lots 1-2-3 (no more than two homes total; no home may extend northwest of a line 25' NW of the line between Lots 2 & 3; dwelling closest to the NW end of the three lots cannot be more than one story in height). h. Possible Sewer Connection Encroachment. The City has been advised that the existing sewer connection for the residence at 3560 Ivy Place crosses the CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 7 8 9 applicants' property. This needs to be confirmed and if it exists, the encroachment should be eliminated (relocate sewer connection) or applicants must grant an easement for the encroachment. Deck and Driveway Encroachments. The survey work provided indicates that a sliver of the deck for the house at 3560 Ivy Place may encroach into the applicants' property. Possible remedies include a lot line rearrangement or possibly an easement. Also, a portion of the driveway serving 3560 Ivy encroaches into the applicants' property. Possible remedies include lot line rearrangement, easement, or removal of encroachment. Applicants' proposed driveway parallels this encroachment. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants preliminary plat approval to allow the replatting of the 3 lots into 2 buildable parcels and one outlot, as depicted on the plans dated July 19, 2017 prepared by Civil Site Group, attached as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1. No structure may be closer than 75 feet to the lake on either side. 2. Regardless of timing of construction on lots I or 2, the Average Lake Shore Setback shall be 75 feet from the Ordinary High Water line on all sides. 3. The property line between lots 1 and 2 shall function as a side property line, requiring 15 feet setback (150% of 10 feet side yard setback for LR -IC). 4. All comments of MCWD, outlined in their memo of August 10, 2017. 5. Declaration and documentation of wetland buffer as required by MCWD. 6. All comments of the city engineer, outlined in a memo dated August 14, 2017 shall be addressed. 7. Comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed, including the principal structures within the Plat shall include fire suppression systems subject to the approval of the Fire Chief. 8. Ivy Place and the portion of the drive within the easement at 3560 Ivy Place shall be inspected and its condition noted prior to construction. All damage shall be repaired to the 4 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6789 satisfaction of the city prior to release of financial security. 9. Additional approvals a. Variance from the wetland setback b. Variance of wetland buffer impact (Watershed District) c. Conditional Use Permit for filling in the floodplain d. Successful vacation of the existing Driveway easement (Doc. 1023891) e. Successful realignment of a underground utility easement (Document Nos. 855727 and 862192) 10. The applicant had represented they have legal access. To the extent that the access rights are modified through court order or other means, the plat would be voided. 11. The following estimated fees are due at the time of final plat unless otherwise noted Stormwater and Drainage Trunk: The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee (SW&DT Fee) on a per -lot basis at the rate of $3,025 per lot for this half -acre zoning district ($6,050 total) per the 2017 Fee Schedule. Water and Sewer: The property was fully assessed for municipal sewer in 1965, only the Metropolitan Council SAC charge which is currently $2,485 per dwelling unit. City water was installed in 1970 and the property was assessed for one unit; if more than one home is built, a water connection charge of $4,240 for the second unit would be due at the time a building permit is issued. 12. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 13. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 14. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat will expire on that date (September 11, 2018). 15. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 7 8 9 ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this l lb day of September, 2017. ATTEST: a Carlson, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO: E.VELOPER 7 PROPERTY OYMER iAE]T EIFYTtLYYIEkE FIC ..TIN9 MN ]5.H] -ER7LANOSCAPE ARCRTECT -e*cE€r wm 4N 9]+118 SURVEYOR SFNOEn,Sign;c o .n+flKC rF, WA)T4N SS[. Q41.14?Srt51 19 ,c OTECHNICAL ENGINEERg '� I NERN IEMi:lwIEB NC MSrtrvrYEE r N 6F(hf.4WNES.4N518rS IVY PLACE ORONO, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR: PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW r [.1 $r,E E.OGITI9M SITE LOCATION MAP N • tS ^ f 11PA plMlllls�r/4 I.iMAIUEIgeM. rliti Ihtd'L4rtISE1'{fgllw!�y, L x.IS aurt[EIro.ICl pImrllrenlM u.LSSonLSN•[IImO• M .a•4a earaTa mru clE•.IluTlul lel saousezmv.Tc. TaaM+u awn Ta mrmflvlwE rrw.1148�Ow � .+•nlslcnsaou for.lula a o •.•�• ........ iT1•tY1i111iYli. PllOIIJYIf lEE1 NOII[CIG� i.4 . t, .<, .: . . 1 n4•xera•mKm.•rtuxp i e PJL I••IflBGlll1 f� • MIVO�WIfGf n1:1Y � 1�IE110®M1El1it�I nII GIIN ufllrvSddarOW M nSrtw®o.rt vYYF a o .'tlrusa ecw r.]laeccl»rt 6»� .wluElm llos�wwn f� rw na+rcfm.INa. sYrn tnfn4fTpml fC.P [.uu ew.,Ele•w GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Eirinllo oSa lYM NM1VN[JCIPIER9TFE cmnnlfcS.Aw nEt�. SEE Ta T.NL IbBq r3t.l Ta i44 mt E YILG JCS4 mf p161f [OGSL GI.TM64WIOLE � Fxlellq 4rl]R6% [}7lTMI. SIG/T l%I{T/lO CeTp MSM •, faerMo wiE YKYE � !J•TeT O.S KYbt f1�6TM04•BWw i ECS*ING F�ECTfat lox - FSahn nvavux w Resolution No. -CivilSitte Exhibit A V 7 8 LAKE WEST ORELOPMENT.IIC SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEET t C0.0 Tree Inventory Survey for. `µ LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT lei. t GOA LEs[w _ NO , x ,,.= ,. SfTE SURVEY ,.....�...:,e: M' Co.1 Rehder and Assoeiotes, Inc] 6789 — CivilSite 6 R O V V LAKEWEST DUROPMENT. LLC Ul ui CL �y V 6 d 1 fyh ! W / ',�j, PrtPaeEo'sllu '.uartl � � J ZONING NOTE5: few ^SITE PLAN LEGEND: J'�. GiflOiFU[ — — N£nNnME PRELIMINARY PLA f L� l 60RfR ETAIl OPE OALl ww Yl: ♦ f�f ff�'p�y- Y Woo- - ' jyvauM roue.a �/ h� . a MarpWrfl Prt. . r � �•� rr � � OK"I"gKD yjf �pf0 r -� a • 0 i REMOVAL NOTES: Ci .: l L it e O R @ Y I' i n.w>r.rmww �...wrt.r fq �ri++c:+a 4spurriq" e M+OrwV wrtwYf.eam[rmYPoMYJnawtrw�avnirwaao, exaR Mu n �u roReuv+iornrtFrn l0(+w 94.An0�5 - __..----� i .Ld nEluR wnrFalwa�Ec50.oMTW �u+Y.^'[I+'!".wFi9SOkAlR.C9Y}i l [Nn4M[�IrlSi9:iM"clrt MeucnbR.0 IC olMuluM�cE olTlrHleSi LAKE WEST j� nnr�cnw 0EVELNPMENULC t+e..-.rirc..o.eoiaresnrs PRELIMINARY � IKnrnt(Uil((BiM4["liW.Cbf"4ifl0Y1X9 r[tu�mra9UNlrwir[ REMOVALS PL AN Mrrpnppr.A�WtNrt tF. ��m AderinurtlU+/lA3t(pMe�6Y.gnK'r`i'K�IIKn% MflEflEI1UlEYJd! WARY P. MaVEMY�rMMfAh ii. T"bt�&rNwlxaaw3W9n1914i - �e"�E !Qr 4, 1"! 94wb01YEYMidtOt. iN! UfvnbIACOIfInOCrbY x,. rieerE. sawcn.ro�w.�nman�rrnra� .�...... ■ J � _V1=1oa. J ,�, .esu 1GY u W .iii COVFnR�p'+F rprl4C'f1 r0N F � n +mrna"mcwrncno"wer an •. wwu+n ww*xn••u w�wrs.`wurwmw �.rnwnwn.a wdwoy n. U x CRY OF ORONO REMOVAL NOTES J O LLJ Ol NOTEfi } LU '- xear�w Sean srrrs A LLI S LU x .< �su:�zue�eii �W� R¢MOV.4L5 LEGEND n �u roReuv+iornrtFrn - __..----� as�.r cs ..+asri worr Wl,r.rtrr, rei.oner..mt �ourwxr.wrs j� nnr�cnw t+e..-.rirc..o.eoiaresnrs PRELIMINARY l USER brhww,a..= ^e REMOVALS PL AN SITE PLAN I.,EGEND, SITE LAYOUT NOM: Cxvi1S ii le ' �. Wlal�,a1/aLV.lIr+50ChnaM1: WLlwJJrls Ai,wl a5r.kn aarnT v w 4 V P as RSTAieorf�r� .lo.waoaulcnP. wsw.f wrw P urrcn m rlc.ren � rns.w „51AV4lOnQkSM1 J,,.. a+nwfnl wn,sn r .•..caw, _.°- G2.0 w,Nlgk,'.1. �MPitdlFMffPblu lar nr55 Q++!}w in hP - w�i,riWWelwr�n.w .lr�4Y ci�ieal�rq u�iw�i `,�,5ar. ro rw u.ax x,As w.ranw5e a.,w l�lrllaV M,lxawPlef+Nw.'014PM '%wa Mlt�V:Ai,R i.An]F ror,lleevl� i .n5nlc .we rwnm�r �mr�m..mmwna. reqs , �arn,c+n wu �rrn..varm.s mowxaofm.cA LA`T► E WES 1 ari.unF+srr anewx OEVELQPMEHT,LLC !lp WAS lat a'!`�!.!l1e5rA 4n5:.[ 6fAip. fK Ir.A.Mb1 m wP/w*p+fa. mn+,oA+•W..�ct S+ et on+�a5rwe�rx Abn[i, ! air ab.k�uarouaacw.ai.Ana o..w5arbw ro+5a :.:.a�.sva:o.�"`+enaw'�rmawanemwAaSslnr4!*v1ro e ne wuwcrarrwlu..ar.evwarrraarswnsusn>rse*w r[!�••4 N+rb.'i: Mr�t r+or,-r 1.MrtR+l,Irm ,a15�a1[N la A9l�f,..lylleM,i.naetYiMi ulflrKlx�r V nR rgI SMPIp>0 PAle♦I/.wKw+UwleVirA.S'+ti#�nSrlf. Ai64x WI+W. .e.pcs n+alaes l,+�clq. row�fw Hors uncaM.,cr�rn f.t ar+Q sxaxs+,e+w�r �rxc*aseaW wirwa,.mla'mnn= e _ wreswsuouarucnnwm n5.er*im.ua Sk+PK. nrza>icw�rrr..nw ra + blmw,.s,5rrr,xw.r sw.,•.nnt!errra,rrlolcrn'r-s*,�- nex{,agW *e,+e nnwFa,w,t,rilf.bd.n+Atia x'lrn:. Pr,1E,aM uYpMdY WNYR 9ia0ff]n Anm �f UYdIV2i1YVMn,tlrMM� �} n Ps.,loeorr.-�.re kw.rw wnuuss��.-ru+n+enok� J J n. Aa nra rowrr...,+wrualsu�nc=nzlrn-m - t �" g LL mn 4 � ,e lwµ lµire1l91pmrwax ri.5#e01a,-s•i nn aw.vaaam Z ¢ n mu.c-.,Ai ans...��s5�.cvuniv5s. ureses. W 7 w � euro wvs:r.ur.55ala+a.�aaweroawnwalsiornes � � � �" +: As •uwrcru.wner�.r5smelwmEr•wa mr (� o Q : lm..nw.arR ms -.s+. a,m ua�s5nrc'l�..e w.m. uaoe•,a Q p J = sren rnr.ne„vnlee+a. J rr W. -. Q- O 7 cve�wic.lnlew l�rrul. u.a. nl..,evrn'• W CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES �_ H rva5.o+cna-r sreu,cwm W . 3 { SITE AREA TABLE' �- W ���� uaTM „aµrV onYam wroSfe YRS a1R('. d WraaamwalN 0V eoa laxV 51w J .�,.v1.aM6 IW V A'A4 W} V 1.1. L10f a1 Lfa lyff V A.l..f.vGk WIr1AC. A/1A i5% nmv n!k giau %aa IA'V ask ..e..rKi*�nnf n.�r JINYIIuu MilSV kROa al.awV Ivtmu wm.0 mes L]RV u.w nuru. mnama -.+• •tea N4.0!!b[a..1M1lWII anav .�n5 ,.arousmu+narrms .wv .w - anus. i.nv sea 5armrµlNTS•W5D sx1AV ula -!A!L`Y�.'_ ��+••-•° *+n5 mrnS nal l•�.e.ammq 5xa i.alC.q;,..,mA lar w+.wKY 1l. nrvr wpv Iaw ,� mrm�n5cim. vl,ao+s zalmv ssfa SITE PLAN I.,EGEND, - nnuplrlc s a• as ass mkswc,e.Inr�S ' .. PRELIMINARY as RSTAieorf�r� SITE PLAN _.°- G2.0 678, , civilsite LADE WEST IEVELDPMENT. IEC ,4 y / yn ;y • ``•a fy{yt1g11�R`pn �'i' f � ' !.0.WiMeiq.fAAtl 'i 5 r/j�� rx LU l ,y\UJ UA h H v C< Lu 3 A Y L1 •,` I /�' 3yy i I SME PLAN LEGEND. "� Cavr�n srat�onE cul w PR£LIMINARI SCFE """'0"' ""' QRPaG 3 SHO{2.1REpS_7B+yL EASE 4 ~ - clvilsite i• � LA'K E IIM [, I D€VROPM€MT.IIC `� _ter -._---•--••1_ ,� '� La EL g j WE PLAN LEGEND. • - resc�c+,r,st _r - -- Y _ 'GL9PIER STFTE SM1E Gli PREi1MINARYi WE PLAN RQaL1WRV EASE _ � - C2.2' 6789 - CivilSite LAKE lel 5 � `";;" ` •.` DEVELOPMENT. RE / W LLI o J L a 3 A riap� .� SITE PLAN LEGEND' cwnc.n ur --- t7 "� E. l , PRELIM IFdAR'r ppn(A SrxTE Q.E SALC � SPfEPLAN- �iF; [) yRFi[? I1TII EASF J (l. nFw.wc�ww Civilsitel EROSION CONTROL NOTES. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: effart ww coma, nrnrs IIIff''���_- ,y •a ,�""'a' GR"DSWATER INFORMATION ' i[,ar� mn _ rx wac,,,4 nra,,, �• S'i -ruwmvrwc"a�+areuc,seam r.: x aoacwm ene,raem.+u en,rsnc o�iounw.n , Y�� M44MMMRWf�'MP«pre'r,N,If�M.TiF,yi awlK � f � ;�,, _yY/i �" „mewMenlRMrsuan Att�W+,�tl�ueIGMIP1W+lS,6arO�K�"+ewin':IXR+ DEVELOPMENT. LLC f•` •A r� .P. .•,, .Berms.�re. :cr��we+ua.«arn_-.-_-.mw : .. rKraeoorarwaeeinnu^a►er.+a�a"aKe..,nw.waraonc>.«se CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES ■ wuctarwwa w�uarauumn+nnwzww�racadcr.o,r:.r..... '�' y` '*L- pp � MF6MAirP Qrc F4CTif TWY CL85 _lYHS60'KWwH �01[D .�rcar..mra ..nr.aPw ,werr�rcP�� r«rm,rx.-.-a o.,sr..�w-,r x�•. rY4, auaar aPaa. [.us ' � '�' f onar w.us rare, ami. Pr cmw�ma+s rauv '� � a �,�Yb, �. {. �crraave,swwPurwx..waaww+'nP�a.+t*.ww..�avw.�ee '•� w 'if a� saeP r �� � Pt awns c�*.ruena.+o c�nvwr.rar�awn,yua:. � xaf re w.s�ane. nc. anw-sc,c ORRM,11wfPCM[tblxeYtM£ ro+K � � �� w. crrwm rowo[naa.swma rna.ruMmPPerawr m,en "Pva,;ew � � . weuauw wPe aYt Ym armr..-iveraw[acva§t aauor n+aet sor '� mm+P.raa rmaP[. s .aPwwwarrm J ., - "m u�cwn. Fb /J +ww, u:,e� waa+c� r[rPrn. axP rsrerc,rsre. nE ,w I J �; �.«[ rsrrmcxr's .�' r.m 1 I�*e°' u.en� �' �j. 3A7L.. .rwemrrmrewuacsomm�s,� m ww usans anewr. a W '*� 1 LLJ m � Jr]a V� P1MllagM Mtr w.K lEp "W�PNttPiN116�C,[EY[P.�@,"tM�- �- '5,y�, cwe�+exm. nr«ron'a"aw"c,un easo-r.+[.,wr ruw+u,.K ee,:.a � /7 ermo..rw.c�eer,mn..+rxr.wartmm ,r.,K ..gin m.. r, lJ _ Q a J •y - rsen ! xiuxv�er,aw.�wrwearnrasesnar raanocawre J UA g� ,`� �� �.:..wa.,o.�,aura,�s,�a..rmr.w...n:�e..wew. xa.un �*, i.. � w 1i W • aa" "aP r � a, t s,.�.aoorweacw,er,rmn.,noe�w�ce..aaee 3- 3 F O ` \ i ,"t A"!! r%E�}7aAlb / YaB[w wtYw,yt a,fnagaPge a[,,1 pr 25YryaMttY wJ.IN39«laai'r[ � � � n LU g a S *.x n.m.e.,Y+ ry /` UJ z ,.E.. ewurreePawarxne.a,�r«wi.�wwrmro�ar^a �e ro.Botr[aroYeaa..*t.eft§kon[w�da•wrrart»tPt Y Q � .uaa"dn a anc � � '�' aceanrsr, ns r,ww„e.a.en,a nrw:e..u,wi uen,e.e�.�..,nY.wr. y1' ! rover wwrrc�erraxua , »s a*ea.,u, re+oKcc sronv rw et aremm.n,«oaoran..Rwea w { + �!f wwurar,xore rHE reo.mrm + � !' a� a, MSW«CTp lWt wgRt'YK"v0\V[P M(HR nurrt+rDf� -:a r iPwwp6 as nl,�¢xr� {�'�� nwavMe.ranyTMa.,.Paera Irr'YaRlPNI91 � �M ��• . �;�' . w. eu.*eu.?avw.xaw+uaRv*+,<a.Pe,arAwerrr[a ..ea,a,w .ad.. N� .a.aaPm.cm rr, Bae m".Baan waacu.�,:aw„� pHNab�60uiKeMe[M.r,r[R 4b�rl'*�'sws eLW+.eWK[eR9w'L /,I I -J anOf9:M6e,OM0.NiP tPM+ree9r *SMnE W9.14CKn � �'Q" �\f GRADING PLAN LEGEND. ci `••�, w,p - Pe"veUfPP�RA.mPJ,I �1 ```~• — • W� ! !� [����� PRELIMINAHI � - //f/// ccwr,Ea SORT[ a✓E GLLL GRADING PLAN J � `rW �J rN -r INSET A RR --� C3.0 V 3 • 0 c1Yilsite jrnFF .tt +C. EROSION CONTROL NOTES GENERAL GRADING NOTES: Wm ,! ■.{ ►�, �. KE srn..dew samaa..ss ea nr srrcnwraR �nsu+a.�r.opvxNwrs.eru cd�Recrn.aNu:'srcErr nr n.r■a rnm.ucnd■awwarnr � IKa®50lR aF.�.r4101 [S'bMtrt}e. (.xNrar4. f.�ae.+�Cn^.[aGiN +• aNrX TM F - 166x4. Etnon .Ge(.p.NJ aarx n['eeRRwE.■Ir•I b� esnvmFsK✓14FRHe Rel. r(gryy YY WellLLYw1RU YlOTkRiS hw:'V�il aM1F R9 YGM%r�6N.lF•K'YY5 1 n /}�•e�er'.ran cannart ,r LM Amt/ � ��.^�� ��� .cmm� s+tiFra.elnm Nnannveawm. �r KE VEST 1 /% �� "/�ti'/�y�[W b.� •�C ,a„rn,., ..r.,.M.nEsmw.. rwern.wrm.ea.r*o-+a5�eervRi.er.rFawnwe. i;� '•� "�^.� ' ; a ..A Kaaa,� OEVELQPMEMT.LLC ----.az � 'iL snM.�eo.._66a..M a. vn vn .n -so .NE rte»a.■ew.�a of teewmes.w[xer..no.. '! � � 9Ti fy. S NUDESdwyvxlW.K MrWSO Wa1Mn...lCxeNr:6 ..4.AVla4�+\ee.a.leo '�` � :�Y � - ul�e Eraawe ,fqxRR� �Y/,� 6 fn.'/'4M0 peNP5 Nadi egYaWRDa,IK aSn.l;amR6r+eri!a Pe">F'W.+H45 r` ��_____ \\ RRUnwmN.dm S `,.Ie4.R..Y Atl.EE M..I+rM4Ola3K■a, ok Y .WIVal0al.Mpw.LLa. n4F3rN'LI+GR..la.4. LpE...bx3.P.111Yab y`` ' ..� a�8 � eM efN O0..'..l6a FwlM.153 nFI�MA aFI.bVU CF'll i0 • !9 6ac+c4'�ibr '� ■+f a0 .m a. EaSm .. ,moi �g� A .ItaSe•J9. YkS+eNo�Ywla 5' � ,� e•Le 4ffiIF �trortSS N[u.U�aaaansunnNErpee( n 3a.ae � ./ Er p■ERUUaxuE.RN.nttin�R14'WUN.+.62eK.eG+trFrPE3 '`' KL.yY1:6o � • .E�e6. Ncett.6E oa eca wE9■uina'ra..M eYnNaermaeW.rvwsq.Eu: _ _ 1 ..� !� sgwrOFi m M RRaG.we glGIClCRG br MCNer.-Cr4Rp Yd* aVrM4.w+EKel'TMYR / � R (.rt.xx[rU?b..N,YNE.Ft6F FSCW.fF6NfFOYRUYaee6aa.EN V, ei. I 1,.3i „0me 'w� � `��ux.ed ��v amMa.ufn. anetl uMwMYM.wIr Vim.: n nE.➢IVGta.+s ..R� �`. x S.m ; M Y � � � KYFF6 wALF1 � R.4aN4. CUI.4MiMaWYi . r1{Ax asm� �,. r+ee0.en a0r w+Fe aaam�M#} F� � f M `YR Y.00Mm _ I r tASFb Ntl TN¢a■l.3 WMIDrt Rv®I,YIn NK.T[sL166 LL' s � xr. „� i/� �6 w� rm.ana®rpsu,{a}r.,,,awwumadzen;� z GS `, �� \\ i �Ervemewi�nwlae[ew.ame■f NaNre,dK'MFf�36d an.EISMC EYsrW W g C (�• NUaEi W■anarewa{KpaaWegMKpN4L K.ReaK'LeaKr YRpeulNe 2 V \\\ � \\\ :dP.itlSne.DaNeSrfNes rR�/aIC.aC pim.y,.w[.M +.lK riai n,H KW[ � � � `� • / G WRN 4,raGlm.a.ta�fA .Lb.eM APPA W.aftrt.F51 (J.esLaUx..u� g? liJ.eMaiANels'tKte.rNCTRE REwSeyE F omaaw ii t� ■ / E.c-axed s+ur.wd ,..ww.wrmwxe wa ca .nnao« a oe. nxo ] 3 O 5 Nita LU NIIR +.cr. r,ur nwa wrN. e.apxdanor Asan nr ttr.a.unaru a.nz � ■ � erer>n,a awsmaF. vo Fmirm .ewuwmermnre. .� i ,• _ vxsr.�+rEw+SeRae+eNre�.uw aEre�■r.esaeacicaisn>+f s+aE*� s / S LLIy •� y m ��� N.4rt'� ni �s��F �nnM.hsld..WYwc.rGe41a�ITeie4i Wr.+�r "" . .. ....�rmraeaa.ne n.eaasnauv..m,n � ,,r�yya 1""�1 eao.n[eetaw[onto.non rs.eunartcttemevn�n,..awaEn. w'SI ■ { .Np.Y� u. euev N.. rNLL.„e,w a,r,l�.aa- n. w.rt.6 na:..•, wn Nsnxx Ra wti 7 , ,. .n.. &' x�a K eweem _ 7 e, ewrerNcc ..de.rd.; '� rtw.eNY rain n`Fcwm+sm�s6,ew�v .en..a.newx weE.as.:�. ��+.�� � w. u,wecrd Is.N.reemra.KNN oea®er aernme mavowmm .reasroartvmmeEeaus. assn rF noloaN�c:n.■FNs� nn as■o new.■nvrn atNca =naceo+�ne.ba,YOUmFiSnwDmrrW1F ,.. s,.w." - J� e 4 �wmw.+a,nco�o a3w `■' "� � .1mE65.lLZO ya/'Kayp eRE.snlslaVlG■n YAllTRaar4wra[nLw nwimunxn ( Na.E�P�4NSG'.[FrxlR 4PaE.Kre�l l�.'S ieRer., A/bKF R[AdaC �g��4P9F9,YMpaF�eRr.Ne.rQ UmRN WU'Y.r4a GRA©M[. PLAN LEGEND. _ �aPJ� ,, . R r a.ne� rnmnr�¢m.x wue f1 °Y Ermannr..aua*Eor nnme s.o•NWfE K�v.raftdnrp e NO'd..R 6e.M11wrfla P4'a..■ .'!N Ye neWar+x _ ^ awm asA+s!.6'ciE,OCCCvareSYEeFapeca'st./4'aPsV n.q [ueU a+OM.P rtA�N'WN .ualR�Pl,nPe ' ansa PRELIMINARY GRADING GM.EN ST.t(exW L PLAN - FLOODPLAIN {/ALLTERA1113N r C . 678 yivilsite i LAKEWEST ftdt OEVEIOPMEHT• ILC LU mg 2 LU CL { t t � oraauas p1 " " a.m � n J v \ 7 U a © z L J ! % \ D- > 1 1. ` Yrrc-o-3..00 / EXfSFINSa 44ETLAND AREA TABLE. Q LLJ �1p i a r S ` 7+:, :. ,+n Sbrrarr lRl Y rmw w~4a � � , kw .¢* wTFlAa�I YiY la90 of t WETLAND MIitlGATFON TA9LE i f� ire 1^• MRTLAm9mnlwAro" � ~T {/ l�� >'ork naraara e4 ula ramrro..tr. +nm x0 +ux W'sgcrl ne r�rtl�A W �' !R[awu�0/lCRO rldN101ii`MTprl:1 MY IL WmBMI'IYCIwi .il[MbE�nw[eIMe1.111GAneY kY.t 111 fr �' rPrlr!!@rtrltWbA Mlt� rAx+RlP'aeRuq� f!1 V NCYrm ONi�IF MDM019,YTMattRale wr[!lru: 2lamv ,�,a� !'a�]MgPp.-fleMuwm tiaMU Mluwo wi[+uu [l:n sr mrra rew��ti,rnweumrim�werorranumr I.awv �rea��sue.�.,.a swwn� 3iEr 'IA,Gl+rIV MiLriRaf'NfM.l6MI1F..MM1liYY�Yf4rp�OYFA ,pgi�r f[.fntfVa.HF,rY. aa� fp 4F*fd 1'1YRMN]MT6.lTdi _ - r E i � LEIS RENIRv� v:vU .. C' � IrCTMriwRr.,.,pr �vq YaA q.1 �.r� rpoe[Yrewra,.eva.osrc�n,ao. PRELIMINARY GRAOJN•+ ST.t7...,.�..or.. PLAN - WE T L ANL'! 1�A'yL_TS ALTERATION i Jrd � In * L.cauckaEklo ateww.t � rnrr u !Ca rererraEmro o �� - Y51bi Ws r� eoor�.a}rr'A,t�if � urcn+elx'•Sss � afYowlcE-m wrr[S �xk rw4 e5' ua,t[s rovnEnA ia, drw+���nn � LOG�TIdrN Cf eof+nuaear mEsrers AP �� %T # •+uESek,SEP m gF �r ' 9 M1ae 43' 3 fYey 3r[nrgcxr� .•ta a000 RwrEn _'r}y vEocE CE++t„TEP .ems d' rccketkoLln l.. ArnHUR ttn n E O R d rP! �` O�krEarrOE�,OKeenr 1 rcaelaF wt u+, f M nrppypg xa FHGaEEA S y9 i t rEewEw weave. rr a utor�� seta C -F I_ `'yi ,�' ` xaera+ewrodnt. +' � SWwsiEA5r5,Er nrefn 5 raarrErioka�rerfew aYLaw tra 6?8 9 GENERAL UTRDY NOTES' din'. M1 WS+[M'ddRiC1511F.5wlYF SeeSCLe.utREret LdtxaE Swig Er #Fend mrn5:ra.rtrwESE m+aswen MelR11410E36M MMlal eWiWPTI1Fl►aNTW+ILC01rK[[M.YI MCIF•' YBMbry •M tWlrryE W1 tl'Y'Je�N�1wW[LMWJSl M}{.Nf +e9 MW[8+13 aS€RR ,aI,uYK etreFEi+'Yu..41e �F. *u exKiC ai i�, Me. VnYtl C4d0.+Z} WLIERrareWrma3R USavi4e^i a+r '� J g CivilSite a. mmucralew.wnw.rwrw+SSLrw naramrdnae5lcS�uo em . o v a raeacEro.rd rcrvd5 eras maesrrex+3x M raranw aiyi w4dLxe, wvrxxrn.aaxwereeF wr.wfaes eEau <..., yn , _.... r , - - w'#r+.ee®oreooaiergrninmlau xr,ewwae.m dort4xlal ,ex ear-Eec+rrurun recewurcwaan a+e,n rvai FeE {il I werrcrur,nuinEe,+u cos* mM carol + �++ar+xx+aa'erwlcwdRiera wa captrn[rw+f'tr..wn x a.nvraorw,eernaSa3JeA,EWlrerdnoraoemrcnw wDSLeeEr aw,t.caw.wawfawE+s+r..'rar+lea-a.rn+Arsc55arr�eo rLnws� Tar.wmrree.f.+rwn„eflorEac.+c5raawoE mrow �,e�.Ea.awlm or nc an uo,54 it raarrErioka�rerfew aYLaw tra 6?8 9 GENERAL UTRDY NOTES' din'. M1 WS+[M'ddRiC1511F.5wlYF SeeSCLe.utREret LdtxaE Swig Er #Fend mrn5:ra.rtrwESE m+aswen MelR11410E36M MMlal eWiWPTI1Fl►aNTW+ILC01rK[[M.YI MCIF•' YBMbry •M tWlrryE W1 tl'Y'Je�N�1wW[LMWJSl M}{.Nf +e9 MW[8+13 aS€RR ,aI,uYK etreFEi+'Yu..41e �F. *u exKiC ai i�, Me. VnYtl C4d0.+Z} WLIERrareWrma3R USavi4e^i a+r '� J g CivilSite a. mmucralew.wnw.rwrw+SSLrw naramrdnae5lcS�uo em . o v a raeacEro.rd rcrvd5 eras maesrrex+3x M raranw aiyi w4dLxe, wvrxxrn.aaxwereeF wr.wfaes eEau <..., yn , _.... ]. SL4iar9e]rml'rUM'/�nelea roar. aEF aexrernSiaR, aurrervro-�SraR as , - - w'#r+.ee®oreooaiergrninmlau xr,ewwae.m dort4xlal ,ex ear-Eec+rrurun recewurcwaan a+e,n rvai FeE {il I werrcrur,nuinEe,+u cos* mM carol + �++ar+xx+aa'erwlcwdRiera wa captrn[rw+f'tr..wn x a.nvraorw,eernaSa3JeA,EWlrerdnoraoemrcnw wDSLeeEr aw,t.caw.wawfawE+s+r..'rar+lea-a.rn+Arsc55arr�eo rLnws� Tar.wmrree.f.+rwn„eflorEac.+c5raawoE mrow �,e�.Ea.awlm or nc an uo,54 it LI AKE ff LJ 1 s.c.�°rm�x5� d us5c5.w w5 wm+aran e5 ,rsu Erae.Aa«aatn. 9EVELOPMEHT.[LE accnelea ncc x ! A.rusa wE sru eEa.essacrarSUA ws oluwc3aanaEe�wxm � Tru ,. u.su+,rw.xerE S.uF w.were,a.,rxEa.o.a;.,,claniasct.�fw,w Jnr Si e..,r*„ mrrecverEr;3r>rrarrsaeE.r Ewla ee aee,nwdwxtEErsri uslor.e5,w�r.w•3r.0 e.. w. u..aml.x,ra.ale.0 atLReet,avr.5we �xmrE.mESrm'Sasreuneraemteoan+.e- ?a +ueaxtptb tx{narettMrei+1'-dS SGfa�e5tnlrr,d[tb MSw[MOd b kc*xla 10. 1"1'IRae rr&W+:uC EledeH mwtrae5a'r!![�iNgSWRva n[ ��SeSrxf VQ MsrY rSSn9AK%'e1lY uisAFI.LH�[ dr^! .ipSp Star R NeM�tYlmr rypyw.f EGSM e1M alee(ELpMMIIIOSG W IIIGarE[111G1 YEYilJN�11. u_red Gww. FLOODPLAIN NOTES IGITY & WATERSHED) ,< GlanNi51i 40neerQOSwraRL wrtE3t++�E[SLSE,mnStEEn.aa ural +ut E��sw+d�u+w wr.ee.cr=nt r5earsm S,F541EdSTt4A55ekr IF dNE4pe ne4fr i4p pFrxaF rSr 4Jva,9RSe*wyna x�ledaSDr EFlt4{r adr4n;[rarE)eE 13 �ogE,rRSSf511 SSfEKIS�tEa SrfEr lCS-0vaarpO EMPJan(ERRf x aaaeaaEa. aE"a'SSrSeEra nweaf65 warn nx vA,cnnrx+eEc,lar n+ee eE x+em�wcE LrrHonnwa>eir3 w�ewr eRererde.+ree®vn.,c x . rwralEm 9[dM_E s E[Cll41p aa+tiL M'RrUA ,.a.e5scneRuS! c±rac[ur�s ra E4 mawwle +111[nF.muo9nfwaA4 SldFffiPoYYIeINA15MMm1 trxxn[x 3vws�+msu5rww'weeuw.�reerra.E.ru tv'xw.reawweEmrt.ec T x eawaxnr raneo®esncr..l.n rr.arswweoa nw pEnwi �rfsaaslSEmiar+orut ewmi.�� wwnex _ UTILRY LEGEND � wadlLf ri �m6 mEX61EYa JRIeF53f W 1 R i. KaJLRY6 M're3n1'!e'lS.aYl16lM H alR wrT mrk+T SM i+ WSaYrsvr5 V4AFrSa. M1tSEWePF59MtS SF4M�,Sife - Z rieEral,etae5 erP52Eiae2MFFW.{KriwMM+M. eCH, > SreR+a+e+raE C _�?- 3ewxaErrx t+ NCirryW SPIRE U o p .: +uatredtenr5lF Sa aSiclwlahu: en>oaSSe tae xre�uo.orn 2 J g. nt--narTr TET caM AAlEWF9 T]r d' Oaf' ff STr»e eSE cares din'. M1 WS+[M'ddRiC1511F.5wlYF SeeSCLe.utREret LdtxaE Swig Er #Fend mrn5:ra.rtrwESE m+aswen MelR11410E36M MMlal eWiWPTI1Fl►aNTW+ILC01rK[[M.YI MCIF•' YBMbry •M tWlrryE W1 tl'Y'Je�N�1wW[LMWJSl M}{.Nf +e9 MW[8+13 aS€RR ,aI,uYK etreFEi+'Yu..41e �F. *u exKiC ai i�, Me. VnYtl C4d0.+Z} WLIERrareWrma3R USavi4e^i a+r '� J g LCL ti Lu 0 iavw, na.eec ovE. m aE � tee r�caaSSLm re u srwrn�3.nacr5ora lY.eaa,Ee�raaweea3rFa®e sa,rt5 eEmrExelr3n ri e5aExr ueF eE u. tdnaemrrsw. w�rw.a.u,K+el wt>, SLw.+e wnu .xn , a 2 � N W M15 N1, i; Si tA/IiE fsYSrAgR aSMPRAa rlM.rJ ltllr reR tYE]W1MR wMIYI{aM(/elwae5w3uxwsra39YFn as na,rl VvY:e �eeegy {il I x a.nvraorw,eernaSa3JeA,EWlrerdnoraoemrcnw wDSLeeEr �, ."„ elr Awl a!n}SSIIIxenddnFernd.w � Tru Si e..,r*„ mrrecverEr;3r>rrarrsaeE.r Ewla ee aee,nwdwxtEErsri ?a +ueaxtptb tx{narettMrei+1'-dS SGfa�e5tnlrr,d[tb MSw[MOd ��SeSrxf VQ MsrY rSSn9AK%'e1lY uisAFI.LH�[ dr^! .ipSp C" OF ORONO UTILITY NOTES Gww. FLOODPLAIN NOTES IGITY & WATERSHED) +ut E��sw+d�u+w wr.ee.cr=nt r5earsm , eaucwMacgme.wwuerrr�r¢narrc xa, �wru� x aaaeaaEa. aE"a'SSrSeEra nweaf65 w.� �.«.-.�_ c±rac[ur�s ra E4 mawwle �<+seeu, +s s�uwa x eawaxnr raneo®esncr..l.n rr.arswweoa nw pEnwi �rfsaaslSEmiar+orut ewmi.�� wwnex _ UTILRY LEGEND � wadlLf H alR wrT mrk+T SM i e.rcaeas.4 r.,5xr.+ > SreR+a+e+raE _�?- 3ewxaErrx NCirryW SPIRE 2s avrsew ' PRELIMINARY iLPSLEksYrr�rf: /Lg UTILITY PLAN erx C4.0 IglE4 t. FewTuxawoTRe¢amEumr_Fxnu®Parsrr�Nwa uLElNc Asn Siq mEM�NCOYRE%wD611EMmx1ASN1DtRtlntuw. w.lw APPOTID.MSINGiT1R 2 6YML W,THILATKIIADNPIIIAIMNNIPTPEP.E BNOfPH AiW RDDT, OR3A1C WIEAN. d1D11El.MI®IR WTIMA ]. DY9RNALLTaANW �IOAfRe. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL 2 NTS i1 PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS - I Compacted Backii 12 _ - •�•• 1114 DCi Spec. n_R_., dpmele., pPe PIPE FrIUNDA-ION & 3EDDING IN GOOD SOILS PIPE FOLND4TICN &- BEDDINC IN -OOR SOILS 4 PIPE BEDDING -PVC NTS CivilSlf a a o _u P LAKE WE DERLDPMENT. LLC U J J H W W a QV Z p J LU IL U W a O i � 3' LU Y' :1 E —.10N S N. -I I PRELIMINARY CIVIL' DETAILS C5.0 SUEDNGDOMEPOUT L �TD� EKTEDDOWNSPOUTATD POINT DOWN OVER CENTER OF GRATE a —W12".,, acLr�l PXC NrLOPLASTOAD OICTAEAPPROVED FACTORSLOPE TO SLOPE TO PMARkTE,OROLILAR EOMALENT p Craele pp•.eTn to DS .t♦ pPo; D�� N.1 tr . COMPACTED SON. z 8'(WAIE TO P PPE INUE L+S++ ea eackr DRAINADAPTER CONCRETECGIARON ( Q`'�d. C . Aggreo ACT6ACK Til CDLA® / ♦�' es . . DOT Specr. }t. -9w Nee PVC SEWER NOR PIPE LOAD FAC- 19 'r (LBgTNA9 REOIIRF)) ft 13 N'in. Bo �i C_AS,", B PPVCLGIORA"I e�e ppetJtla p"� r sAcpea Ir angnar 9EDEEIEREL90W p nNnq mctera V PVC SEWERPIPE L CRISIS) AND 61i COMPACTED STONE - /g, ComeaclM eackl�i DOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTION I — — J NTS > •ee Dsenlip n < LOC FACTOR 1.: rLASS C-1 wM�PWI L �w s1� >zidson 6. -_ 1, Bc' e Fe.1 tl Cyi S11w. Ba A }9 9n9 Ned. cLGAD a but not ♦ F _ •om4�1"de;;e"k rACTOR 1 -Less C-2 c -z IglE4 t. FewTuxawoTRe¢amEumr_Fxnu®Parsrr�Nwa uLElNc Asn Siq mEM�NCOYRE%wD611EMmx1ASN1DtRtlntuw. w.lw APPOTID.MSINGiT1R 2 6YML W,THILATKIIADNPIIIAIMNNIPTPEP.E BNOfPH AiW RDDT, OR3A1C WIEAN. d1D11El.MI®IR WTIMA ]. DY9RNALLTaANW �IOAfRe. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL 2 NTS i1 PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS - I Compacted Backii 12 _ - •�•• 1114 DCi Spec. n_R_., dpmele., pPe PIPE FrIUNDA-ION & 3EDDING IN GOOD SOILS PIPE FOLND4TICN &- BEDDINC IN -OOR SOILS 4 PIPE BEDDING -PVC NTS CivilSlf a a o _u P LAKE WE DERLDPMENT. LLC U J J H W W a QV Z p J LU IL U W a O i � 3' LU Y' :1 E —.10N S N. -I I PRELIMINARY CIVIL' DETAILS C5.0 678 () ', �• `, ~_ H11. .•'tIYRpA ,.LIIH •rHa M, r:Y3Y, aw 1E ClvilSxF /rr •w,r rf��r X33 H 1•wrteea rw1 419 111 mnPruf. riou. fa O A O Y • ' �• `�\ H 4wrlrm, s9w T bo [e1mRY. ra11 A �� +K Al ii411ip. IiJO• ,1. I..OvltY, Ia.l rti ��r � A. 4i9•IIOr rpp. t6 m I.�H461le rp[. .0 i H ar1Y[Irn r�Xl 1F1 p9 �. V • � 16 f11 1?mPfl9Fi .!3 � 'C�. < i b� LII 113 .w I. ril.M1ilt Mw LAKE f .11 1tAIwA., raw m rd +rAnx3 �u SflWM t' / ► N. e �`,�F�" rte. n1 DEVELOPMENT. ILC a n !' � —Y u•err�[, rW. T9 TN xiQ.fl9ly Iw• 1a gyp:_ 'ii.�R* re lrbrldl. rw,a m H or. ,. ..3 •m®e3., .w m �imnxv r.� u A•wn.1 .aa � ew H. s, rx m �, w nitillcn rww 1Ar .m•flar, raw tv F � sA �`„w •ee. rp en fiFM%1 aDG. Se 1', ��` ep��" � ,%"� Af a•oo�nu. wu .n 1ronx. u. A�I.m � pl 1F� � / � !A 61 i0YfYIR I�1 � •PI FiGYIX](, 1�� 4fB _ � N i %14 �n / r.� Al YE1Yaa � 11f ISi 4Hms, M Y!9 ` ��. 16�F^_ /r 1fp]j.fl�.M' f1F 11 rdlNN � WR FtlMa9i 46 I� 'c 11� 1�'1�1• /f }If 11F}IW. L � 1�i[i sp � , qqyy! /� rw, vts piftilL]IS rar 119 Ll% M144.. ■ 1� / � {{{ s IeX1,EA 9. 119 W, ki �IrR i RS � � `F ., ; ! eq py,. � w'! fek13M. rAA m � H•Hm_ i raw F ✓ itfl� rr .iOtINN ral• •[oue7f rpa (� A g �S,f_ �a M1 f iWIrIXI � � W iCllfl.][i ; ; 4H 41 � wIM 'A. w >sa .ermrt an o9, �n J UJ a3` i % ., "EBM•� , r m nu ser > �L w r.meuxr ra. m er Nruwolo wo, ,a "' W w ASli N F1rtttt, rM 4R 1� W rw •i3 w h +3\ � ♦ � N111{Ip9 Iwt +11 IbrLi, ,e. � � r 'tel ■ /�v { iFPadWP rJ .tl IlA IiPMIXI iuM 1m ui ` •yy� 4 V1 f�alww •� 'A9 � }iCtL'[, ,� � $ ,SRf "Ar, 9 VI M. HRIA1 r 1�C. ,IW H5 �3 ri•� may. -!i iN YF FIb9WA •L1 vp f•11 Ii�G9I, R � i �� 'K>r' dp' A iOFllbl. wit � fOtl IN.hP m . �. • �'�, S .'� .Duan I.... .n 11w ripr39n m Six rA 1WI1111 4R 1 1r N9fl. 4r3 1 a.pn1WA ,Is ra s rerun •a. � Fpm Suu .rn�`ml, .e�rrl rts . *Helm j� f" '.r[WwmrR,LWrP,•MVStiFt.9 ✓ REMOVALS LEGEND 1 �a.ar r.eewr C IIO r,01R J. 33[1 TF.'Y•U...A•grJpTS Np rR•.x A PRELIMINARY TREE Ert 51 T,E� xa. RESERVATION PLAN C6.4 Cly' 'i -F /f 4y U / .iKl�Mu P y - �.r - .0 M " ry � e1YAncrGEw l YY11FlSrt�.na J�T -. 678` PLANT SCHEDULE -TREES - �1 WN.CRwK nuuur.aEuwagnwc c�.., i Ci$ a R O u R m ouWT. caYwRw.YAE 1RTNw(JLW 8rL IMT fdN s Atcanls,.Ra —w—,e YS M�e1aiW .Cf%c Iq i*R,drn 1[rMl M1aA.tJwr EEM, YIG.I. WE _ All eae"eY 1Y.RrawUaa N.wrrCUY' a.Tr/4. eaM.m a.•fi� 1M FaE!ra„1F.e1h RAa RMw LAKE3 4aEww>StKQR RU EE'llS� uAlEYr.PRrl a1[[9 .� nrl 1 w,,.. MfmR E,M T t,oram,rwnuRv n..p+. ..n. - w aa.M3,tISIX 1IW - — _.._.� DEVEL�PMEMT.LLC M S %m-. ESC\ /li RY.wnl[MRI M1u.bYr E',LNf%En REa6 _ M 6 RN .calla aEw.C! nei,►m-.� .__— me _.Rnwnuin[n.nu rpy Lu NATIVE SEEDING NOTES F SPECIFICATIONS: i M1.+!'aG ,YYA wRwuyrtf(...,,xtvR'AEOVna[91wMFWwxWM,FEaKfYfn.wrWa. rAA �.wEt.�4Fs>Nartb anlYw.ei wxi e - �1 WN.CRwK nuuur.aEuwagnwc msa+ui Euur .map- Eezr..vu. ,An.Taerowrrams ulowerrorwna. I� j �r�.y �.y L[liBGa wna[6Y .E 7 ,.A -. 4Y' �1 Jl - -.4. / ].YS - Ernv.enr .awEearoY.rnwr..t nnwgMI MMOFOMlYt � n aewtlY�:efwR f..,1p..w'MwEw.,r W'Mt.Yu,E.t af.V w Yw.M,r.ilwwEr.awpwws.w r. n Y..RtYH. eE...H,AOewM1 �-- � a 6LL OrEwYReMMSplUu 1p.SS WFbry' Lu 0- QQ o Q = RYY 1AnT@YFf r]R Y+Yw^r.E aP Yw.raY,M ra..rylp rr� ,.xv w raoEow.c. i uaxn�nwn�.lR �.w�e: ar+n.lRres.awn art,eewm em�a r � , LLI EEArxir`niR I f �,a®.Ynwr car sHwao ur L LLI 1aC[I m /'tix r�nrtt nw6 �s e4iiS,26RAdU m nFT.vMEF9aSIbe 11l\ ju ' y r": w �[IwEr a i{pt m rR.upRR.evRo, 1R. e1RRR eneewn Gl.ntl4wiFd w LANDSCAPE NAPES: .wunrt: :n a,uueao-a _ate -yJ s•'� xf�f316 1RD rG.r"6FE MFa un.s .A..O..YQ49. � nxanH,w.lw � � E � eons �.: : J •aowm.sTn w v.rmrn„wa:old+ua,atrwar ewru uwtne. �vwwu.rowv.E wuar+cwsE nnbroY.axl.wx 'v ,f .` � _ a.rwa corwr atrt x raaorEaYmn:xd. R tIb10 MYLL E,tnlf.'IbYJMYN,V,an [ae,R _ ''"fI�J �raae�lRw e,aep.6.xE Po11 Y1P01k —y- �4` Yn '. - YtA9A+1 ErgTrit ri a ti,Aa.n 9WlE..e#[S+wT'af.Yr/t9 nwn„4:a 1 `- - A'p .*ww,e.A R WO,*O Mf. R9t A. f+u�[R A.TA 19wee#Eav:.E .,1 nR� .�Ha nap. r aaHH yf.'• MGmvRm[ R .aspuim.srta �al1YrlpL. � I Ymfr.utA asap iR .wrn na.ew a•B � � ayl..S+CHV R mal b'IRIGOEYCbRM llfdMYAEb ]e.K"w4lTRaA NwR,ClgYltle[f,cvNlrl4yaWYf.y1,p \ 1. � � �Fl YYaY luw.wRb R.H n.1EYM ary ),,Yaal,tlb Y'k.'Wct � �,..-rr . JE'pleRORR�Or E�.erMLY EYY�tHe gMY'al"' �Yf 1y rU,lllErw,1l�wl F SRl..ne ahri�bl eVHpFMeE QWAiY YMw'aI,EM MrJw 0MTI4 / a -w+ a. SAE aex,.,s>w.swuxrxaaARM j� - .can rr.'iu.cw..+ na.:ERouno�n, me s®Ra: wome..l osrwmawv�s7taaa�w .�eec"re pon[n ewwloaw nye AMaHp+ar aw ]}IA.CT W40C.EF WY1ry.ye i.waVMCd,eR.Ca 1 `^%.'+ .lA Ya=MaMTeI[ 1+4111+w/wMTIO.GR 4S t'IRt.tliM9%.]d! ! - WTD.. WYWYrn WNerf�MMErtlwvldl,nw.. +11lr1}IeYr.rb(arlrna.wn ` .aw�naemRaarn.cn,.cTnraaa.wl � WM1,r.:l4w. 1r.E iY,.E.Mu.�eYR>f �ruar.to.trnoem.ssrusm w[a tYu arY...lrw M.uYEE +,.rY+.+'eEwwl'Erewn000r n. ! xowawnweaaa,a.xa,l,o.,swxnEewe •w. .EOPfWM4rRAw14alITe+O anJ.Er Pa1MMG MdM.OilEwCtGY 1.M1 fa.., w Tf ERIOwEwf ppE/l WYRnRRn IR Elt.m.i: TId.dE IKy u,ni.aYe.EAn pvM.Egintl+M 15RiWfeEa.4 uacwiYel Nv�mfaan,l.trw ./l /1��� .ali 4YMAYY 1M1 f� �d f"JT 111lYV!lY.,ura Irw .w pW{aepA,aiA,uC,wr{yY{y,RTpEF}, `�. ..e...aea,lwH, J.nK.W t4.ln!lATAw4 Ereela•�y � x wn.,nt w.maw ..rrpow ■x } Ew�eaemwgr a eaW eeE an - y wpn 004M.IwAC R -- rw.wuwwwe lw - wEY1-vavm aTl isc ,!. o.YnvYYo R anlYw.ei wxi e WN.CRwK nuuur.aEuwagnwc .map- Eezr..vu. ,An.Taerowrrams ulowerrorwna. I� M1Yn. rRnw,Sw,1 W.Il.w.w 11E,ra•IY.t � n aewtlY�:efwR f..,1p..w'MwEw.,r n Y..RtYH. eE...H,AOewM1 �-- � a 6LL OrEwYReMMSplUu 1p.SS WFbry' Lu 0- QQ o Q = RYY 1AnT@YFf r]R J s ra..rylp rr� W w raoEow.c. Ca . � s..Mrm YIXY art,eewm em�a ..: Til LLI 1LLt sYYvnr caxwaaY.l.ae Yrf. L LLI 1aC[I m e4iiS,26RAdU m nFT.vMEF9aSIbe 11l\ ju � v Sf��YWIIA.R06 i� fi5 �[IwEr a i{pt m rR.upRR.evRo, 1R. �� ap. a s� tmmr .wunrt: :n a,uueao-a _ate xf�f316 1RD rG.r"6FE MFa un.s .A..O..YQ49. ' waw 1RA muC Y E[ f.[ts.ltrfi wH"d u,4Y maw .bwa■ H..Y Y[t9rwEc rw wRa.wca. �cvc...:'.n.cra„ HAEassAEerwAn.wr 0 — amr+rrlru�Rs'r-srw _ ''"fI�J �raae�lRw e,aep.6.xE Po11 Y1P01k —y- �4` Yn '. '�. 1✓ 'YOEIAnw¢'1�e LANDSCAPE PLp,I`! wa L1.0 r' _y r rc6T,Y! �4rnl# �9MA/ dl:R j v�ga�ri an�saaleeiR �`� __, LSI 3 wL oo+.m EraxeAaLL, caAnua4rpTaio r�RT,ELi diF FdaY 9UYfF 6789 SWPPP Nt77ES: CTvi1V as¢Fsa FYYto,E +[xE wa+/n L,aTmaw.4e,w aw*.dEaodw carrrc. *E.mm�e,4a� 1 L Y R o U P r+cu.Ytcr+rar.'r+E F.r. er arro.ro - .. ��E �Tr aw,aYen Taw.LL �gaEew wY,Yu rru,ea ••".,..,, oF�vun.c wnanAc*SEa f iEE c¢AprMa Jwrca�.LEq Rrx.YL yn..prbarp E4usw ceriaRx +.arra KRp1�a a[>oand4ErtalrwvnWROwErrYArtw w,.ttirb„aYru�CWntw.rs'x„Hrw;!EeEEawT L AKr I WM CRY Of ORONO EROSION CONTROL NOTES L DEVELOPMEATAC avE[YrtDEnsaae,um aEaYEHO C4 iwx nK�rt{E A,4 YEF6U9E6C9NRAi1�6M.1M arl6en AP( rad uirwW ,ac Q�YEMR� �e ��K1x•3"n YAT AE C[41a�[n®tFAri J uCci '- W 0. O d i 3 w qU, W } M W a W z Y LEGEND °' „""• .rr,. uL ruwa. Et{�ARGLI/rNrLV1 . � vmnww.earaRvrmwnu -- wuwm�..nnw a..r enn.•ortsnor PRELINNARY $VQPPP IIDISTING CDNgR10N5 �. Swl .0 678x, f SWPPP NOTES: C1v1Isite ,l.:si�v[c..s �[rsa ,wn-er,[io>E «cw.rc... a w o u ► fcn �w��i`.iea Brrye,E�n iiAarr�mi o*+`rs�'a+orn ��.. ) CES2ifs fW+OaW+b'+bf fcS Sfa"m�V+C+'fbrpfn .+1'Y. . 4CPYesibY.f WrRwL.YM�f �'-•`� ^-�:-1��. .� i$f, G4WYW.hIAN inx.p5*+s.�/�4 tvXaM6�1MY��cw �• (WYna ppiif [GMA.Lrpp r8 NE5ic �6aF. saY BMYwIW Fl�EM,.f.CM ''t 'rala[fiM. un rppLv.fc vrv+w YNOEe a[p.at LAKE 1i LY1 CIT ' + . Y OF ORONO EROS[ON CONTROL NOTES. BEVELOPMENT. I LC � ,� .;��•a, 1 +`� - Nom•,, �� ��� T "• wgSyb pffir[taaYv e'e 9AY V a� 'i [N[E.r 6Rr8NG LSM 1H la —% iYL AIE HOIlOs p�_ FW •r r•nKYM1OIw � \`' •. � � R+4trtCr Y'F iA,}la r � y111,, Ci 0 7 LU a�+ I.1`�y{ '1 la' • �fMn'Fl41M.ABwbBEO TM LEGEND �_�•..,.. ••. r, t I PAfYIGw,Kc n.W¢Y '� - R ELIMINARY 5 WPPP odi+fA £T�YTE �uu j -PROPOSEDELI CONDITIONSNDITIONS CONDITIONS 511111.1 6789 •n�^�� MMFANeeMe CivilSit O A O Y P OY9F]PTAi TOPOf A]BgSi® 8191 A839lLT � wM W r. �wem EAO1Mf: bIx. MTR BpX iLL UPertF/x aAS[EMfM911 9 Ex9mopRouNo zPomoRpowpPro wacAce �. EMxD R0.L > osaclwaRow LAKE WEsf mn-A1zMx M m�oc --� WIFNxB;NImMbIdMD. FINfAMmx1 R Y—w ^^' ^°°��^°°'�° °�°°^�^' OEVELOPMENT. LLC w le Op 1. W WOB! RIERLOBBIBD R91B161M1L8E Rl1EM(R�INCORFRBx991MF1A�'EOE0.�Al NlaNL011 EA90C 2WIPOBT RIFAroBEMMIE NOYAWWOSI BMEOOYtl{W�tRRC BPMNOO6.10% ONit W Lv pECA W D51� W Opo CNFS. P91 MOOT PEC 21I. ]. RTER FABRC9WLBEOmlEi1LEINrtiEO WiE1nM.MMwKOP9![: pF 3T. N01@ LFMULiPLE RIXlBNFmED.OMMNW IlATOOSAmeTAaf. tarAAperaerowiE uraxmwurzxsrAMAnpxorxu�vlmFccnarM9ap. s. uieRAUPFaa.�aMwrtxEAcxYxaprllERsuFTVTF�1ou aRAepEE�pF�Rr Ecwzmrcronawu.eaE:AuwxwEAlEps9wortwop®ar maNmcsuFAceancar]raN Nx1E mnRAcial ipWmmAx9lanER Ner1nN. ureRvaleraxertNrAmATT1EmFUTOMa rFecpxmAcr. aRP9�uREMuzErerxoMOMTE9nLc CURB INLET FILTER SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL /COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS 4 NTS W rowlx � '°� � eai m NrmNNE Nrnarx9 J � g aF9sFo. § NFwRrxEr:aaAuoE z. TERrwwcAePEEOFEEo xL1NE � z roxR NMORTNET MIMM9AL 'j d PLAN 3SR NOFCREDLMMxE18pN ,GP51M4 Y TO TION MEA MINCRUxHDSTONE Po618 Ae PFCFlFA y�j cW Zp k ANCM91 FA9C]MN LU G 1- �)SWMMUM E.— F%991p oxBBu 100. TNNeKO4 W 5 Z 1NmRIRffO BUPACE RTm peEG1kNIOF ROM Z Q � CARRYxRE BL'.PoRTMFT ^ Q OOM11N101RENG11 k� e T U W LU g W -I Q Q F ztru.wrseaoc u PROFILE' L � f1 SEDIMENT FENCE N01ES: NTS g W 9WOEAFPRJPpME,PN9MMaE9,®ISiMLI�eUI61MILTpNORRN[£MIp IRA6,il@p � _ ROOM'AY. ire 91mANc,: swu eE MwrANm x A carrmx x1eN Mu euvwr mab9lo a Rorxo a amx9lr 9Ro 9OBFYRBEDRJAOMAr. T9awvRmlFFEem9ciaa dFs9NDR1RAobmul ar9eoaADPc W i srpNE ro nc uxpm a T1e; art.Axu. n aPrw,voaE.wwrtsF �IemromArsmelERr. Q smBF]1rPum.mpe.m,wWm.aTF1N maarolwsne®aolPrArswueElapIDLa L oNECI®N,�EM�1. � J n Rwu OCAlgXA1OxPNINd191MILeEtO9OxMm MrtHIMftMfEtlpRrowrarRucrnFl ApR9i6. a n cra9marpra awuPF-1o•NLaoeEoeApEaAMoxroMluorsEcn9izna @STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NTS Tws �II�roMa sor wu A' W n¢m.9oosnc i�A9m f11GNATRENY1Y91 q SW 1G.MpOO] ]I.EENDEATN Txllbl x11M1] �Ka�w=}x_ O ONWMe1FlrURA ISS-1—SUMM- -SION—MARY iAlf®.polNml^rpE --a�w SiARFa �/- MGEBTAREBicEETAMM —T IYPY 3TMEx roI®WTnwwxr _1 o]upEwxE NIEePnroeaL - &EROSION BLANKET PRELIMINARY SWPPP N T s - DETAILS SW1.2 6789 GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES TRAINING (PART III.A.2) OWNER INFORMATION- __M[rmwa�INuuIIPIIw[renbP[I>MIPPIMTNwvwmnlieY.aBnln MixtpwPoUNP 1ilosm°"�irelm n`r"`o,ml�"rwo-Mr[au.wwt®Iwm,+»wownluxmreelxnrmcrlwrc owp�.mwbw VMLB.ravwrtrofMMt..t'll®W I�brtMsf wer! Mw[wownc.roMw..w[ra.leummean.Ma.mlwLl."cl�rn�xParw OEMONENOMFFP:[Mi1XEW 0. MMtPE murMccarveE:osMaaewwv mNlnoTwrm:Iw.EANNauME9oin Rua wca war NN OWEM. LLC T�su,e xs ssxs PART R STORMWATER 06f]IARGE DESIGN REOUREMENTS auwmmun,leemrulwmw�elwaN:aNwam.A,a,wP.rltroP oallwm,twaaallnsw rsmucra:.lan aNPMN INTFLaiwo.mmRE: nrm,,.A,[mn 9nss :as STtPPIPART RA � !�!�" TDTMTINNXDNaaS: tS canna: ��� Ti k�tls.taCld�� m[llaca[PmlLIe.W.P,Al1NIANIIArtIdGtalltl[ma [swp®w.aaoawnwwlra RE+DtI1gGTox. tnYt�wn. pllgMAElm.l01/D,r Mtrt tewnM�w�� sdNc wW�w OEniDUE tn{xFe tMf..PPmF.luf. aNt nov:l.lNal .IerF1f no n • ,0N1fN UaMgtll Me.l OPrsCEl wn�91p11�� !lllxt�[romElr.[.l�.�i[ A[LaGrtWxmLwucn6l rvan »a.M Mn.[a4MErE ,OlMtmG6RMnGRttl®W,lNfw®NBMIm AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART BI.A.4.BSC): P,Pa„wMl®m.RllOra fY[IIM6 PMgIWle11 MpPDPFDIOf! WIv .al. .»�"I" law .wnrwrml Ilgwwtw[Ion weir x�w an x,xe NHLpNOCOVIIAG[ ov oat IOfY u1011 IShc4 oY oAM m./rol6M1lrtN IMo[cIWA .P..!!.ro YOCYI[M1OdI®IMNAi [rLLM a[rmlem¢m[atln ALLMtI RSY Q3f LI[aY LIES LTSPM S!. LAKY Y.A% art,[P.amWMnsmClpllY4111»MrII,MfInKOPIBW.A S AUMMd69pK6 1SnlY sTf pQPY J1.11 o 1pMlY Mme[ Lti[Y T.BM awrttWbrl ao o�ae� " rl6s»,srrsww.nra MstoplwreL rvmwcruLYawuw.woarm [rol[[..aman[uapmwllxi® TOMLMRW WSS,, tll0lf A- MOOM Skmw IODDI[ S,1i[S[ NDA MauBmlemlm[[ HrM.�E�i�91�Ye��rrvaaurt%vaisiixt �� rew®amMllt�r�wNrls..nlA OSSNr6[oNlallal >@u .st �ml'rPaww+o°OrtmPM.crw[ex.:® noraa®calamxlmA aaPY w �!®a�P.R`aPLI Pwvl.o,eo.a,..Aa..le®w+ worm®RaMgrlOTx wY s!I .wmlll.mrvMl.wa Isr:wmwnm.lmm[row�Pt2rm[a,w.xuo[nwmorxoetoanwo taauaa oU110[A L�1ss ia[ RECORD91klBTIpNryIATRES rowNMwF.Cw,1a:Ww[M Mw.ntsrm[el.t[I.vwremw.I.na.rm.uxax�xP.atnYMwa[r. JaTeMM SOT.,my 1LSISY T[l. Tmu1 ,.tm,.amvrAl ANSS' ua wmr»Pnwn��P.m`�"!'awm�iim 6M+ atP ..'V"BYalP ixl uxalart�w"mrP..t°��ooly wa.rtw�P»EowNlraar.al.wlxa O1r DEWATEAIDAM)SASNDPAMIG P'AAT NDS Imanuo[am—`NOP.l sWeY teat 1OTMTM9IRR(a10.gPM.A [CONY 1tM d.Ppa':rmrlPntltnnv.x,m Ml rC Iwr. lmrts.ala[rmtlwa:pr[wewMeWlrwaMlmu �r�®ml.mloeaenAAmwolll�s.rlxowtaPartIEv.RumiE W.minal.cnn.M,wwar wt2 'YUIW IIwwWw/aw.weAAMwIPen[MMwbar.w lfrA�P �EMwraurorlmPw�m, Nnlen,id VstPPoMmFMIawBMBw .�sF�ialE0.MrtIP�tmna rmwx oMNRSOAIIG TLOAY �Bu�i[A�llrww Y�mlr�wr mewl[N. 6o"awmeocum„Iwlw P.gw Or Mtaww+r�'u.orelwenardw.rmw.waeervnnea= Iw[wucaa.:P�wtOxoxrabr6,Mr WwrNIe 0.W9.m WAX rld WARf.M[W,2awlvrtPt»xtmnL MT RIN}RID1q[L Ll®M CROON [ONA0.EWMOT .Y IaFTP[OrtapION� fO wL SWPPM .ENTATlONRESPONSftTTES: oy r, a+P[[aPMNawwlwnnramswr,ne[vel»u[w.olmn:wepiaMwmw w.laalrOlPl,sam.mrvif waPar[,Nr. ►OPEC11DN8ANOMAIMBIAM:E ryARf NEY Pmve.� Pl�wwnrnce:e�[�slPonenAwrolla.M� wva.uo!«w.,elnwwomrwlmllla "welt: mnnYO �ro:m m�ilrww`�wuxwNenwsC41 au[ r' daw�'a mv[wawwi`P cc �»� m[rlw.ow�ItcaMwcawmPru � x �wowwmwcsa .Psis®[v.[e�cl»I.aerwalo[sra®...s w[,Pw �aarePw[cr»xvm.In:»I'ml.olnl"'I".o.Ma.lwa'�, `"Nxul.rmw[,IIiP�new ,�! e.manxtellameowevrwxt.awn:wPninaaluw ��� CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY FIELD WOUREL9nS: A[a�weln� 1.ara�w.aalNoaNMw.lamaMNmwenum[row.mreAPaumoP w.IP.cIa.PR`�ENIICIP(PAM NA) aDDRLawN.rt.RFPa.e�l.. � �-�aw.rv..tmn.11P,ual,�[Ma,[�[ro�wlM w[Ra.r`.Isw. `"e�i[aaa�'.aam�n"e"oe.�ilo- "oo:oi'ti[na°"r'w[[a Pt�_"lo�rmwr°°Aiwm`['.e'"mli en0e'"a[aw,PusxoLolP wenP.:m![ra.xlewa,wowsoww,mrvtMlA.aot"ww,wiart.!®w:«w:wMwwo lxY,wM r.a. ��N'wiowl"vmlw�'wm: m"inv rMaMioM��w,as ® �su�cr®ir»'�`o.tKP101[ooF�"'an'mwar'"'atwil,awwa w eowtw.mmlwlcaeutamwmNnro,moN9 w"exorwc.anelaawl.ra1epAml�arm09e iev°.l�r°Aall�lPo:rar�xo °mwwwn,namweelw rePaPMnw eMsaN.RamawlwarrN.MaNImoMA®w.ncaxrM.armm.N,lNlertl, onlwmomma � mo��a. �[,c.lw.oil®roe P -..aa rlae.P[Aswta[t,wlowm[I>,wlwrreRrN�A.w..n!” 6EEDNOE3IPNtf MAAA1: oY�artuwrwrPlxmoemwtlwwrlslwwwurwmwcrw w,wwwarw u ®Leos Iw,.PYwro[ YIIu! x IavamQ Kw M I.mprlmw x.xu.L TEMPVRMYEROSMCONTR(XSEEDlQ MILCHM8RAMJET. BED.NNTCONAIOLIPART N.C) m.nNlwax.enP. Nor ePes:w[P.wwm noa"�iler'�"wr waurvaoecw�"m�. `w axM�lao�a,ouv oaonm uNaPrnenlomrvialt.[mwm'"'aan�4�mam�towaw.a..nlawtalNa,NE,�an.lrlrPa PLP Pren.en n. ml»rncnw eaP.mnnm la sa meat F welor.e wwrw:ra la.wem. POLLV f pN PRE41:MpN AVNN.EIEM (MRS NiS Mro«P�m�aPLLPm�awrMr.LP.mP�..atnlPllwwalllrtd,ww[aMml[ nuoPM.aTHIAalalaalaaxNlarw.waaa...MwPwOo„ro�uNb�mlll»Lr�w � n P[muaM'�ima oll.°taolzw�w[. a"ronecrm�m�[w"�iN�w�reP'*ella', mm�wne�.rwwuw»�waP:""`miaoe o[n iam"a[rama[ �al'oie��u�"elrivv,-mo�[ivarwi T�im1pi°ProaiNu�asa�x[o`�`eeo:weeRre[ .e�aawroM:.waParr�PlmCO"..°rmRml► �omwrmwarPLaumlr .ro.ccaluuroeePirlwmerolNa"wwP alatel.rrow,.m.w.w[l..ew,s.Jwm aNrnmT.eN. M.1[we.a»oni.arla.lora.m.[.o.arroc,r _ muNMFlPlmoola MoeLLll®pimlEMaPNemwaIXW WTaMN..[!. MYMVR. [IIF1Mr4aMrlWalLumaYMNrII11ILTal1 �rWU0.4 ANL BTAOPAIpN �TN.Ot swIl MartWwloxa�Mra MIM�s M�n.vMrtll N�a�uu,mxmr/� "alitw�ilr rwro�wlMwaM _ _ m"%,Timlw'x1Bmwwta acwamrwmlw�ro� wo.�aMxop vaFremRn� rear rem`., m M�.I�O,.Vlwonrarwmrealo�ruw wmwwvwaunrel,mawexr.melwcmlmwrr SWPPP CONTACT PERSON coxrxncTaR: MPPxP.EaTaJ,w.mP. ALL aNP. wYEcllala M W T O PRRaNEn er A PDNaITw.r 1REr9,xE,AM.,D REa.asalrs a M aeaa1x19 B W 1 SE PPOM®SY TE CDrI1PI.CTSRNOISITax911EN,MMS PARTYRESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PtANNIOfsraRNNATT:zNaASFMDDeIm,REalamASP.Rra»ePM.[6TroI�rNPDESItm.r alaelDns.TJa PIpPOir akm M RESaOMaLE FDR M Lan,Fmt aT:MMM A1A wrAIINN`tC a M I�RoIORn 9TDmanrw Prsra,. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE F SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATERk conm.LTa+swuolrtwnw.raMl �I>�s �ac�nAort9m.dlATanrwrtor»cwawiMewP.drr: na lei SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: T1.TE xDT[9 MaEIaEDE.Nr SBwL MV P NaEa. TNMPRartrs olmATELnm.taAVM9b MMasPe.mrallEalF®,xtApra9u9l[r,FDroTtEN1Oa MCDXtIa[L DRM INouRm ro aat.oR M aaara9 M M wm Iewr TMwwlart merNPC nox. PROJECT NARRATNE SPECW TMOL Oi REOIIREMeM SIZE SPARC (N REOL REDy. argil m u,a N,D, M m.m�atal AFIN,. m Mi [anent a M lE w9,TraA.aP[r o[ aPNNemL. nLma.AnrPm.mllw KalMansor uwwPiac MSi[[ulDrmawae[rua LaAmx[MT S.el M,Iln lONw.tl.SOR[mO,ial M. ta�tlMNNIaI �� M.f KPF,N.oaIMNry MPP]NCI1 PFm4NEx[ffaRMw"tER wolCl.ltP,m.Yr. tewlOR tMlialaaw.PPow,lalB,l»,FPaRrRmbA�,CO��1arvm[ PEFAVAO T STARIPATON NOTES SIE SPEOFIC. Nwxa.Fw.»mwcarrowNwn.wwomeEOl.a SSNt NraxNvnrOPwxu. NPP»,is J�emla.w�!®m�E�rmrPE�mwo"Tiuu .teR.roa. a R o u v w+».aw.��waaw[at LAKE Kff DEVELOPMENT. LLC V J J a z W W z o a w a wW s IS Tn W W Y g RENSpN SWNAI[r PRELIMINARY SWPPP SW1.31 ATTACHMENT A S1TE SPECIFIC SWPPP DCCVWENT Civil5ite _ c.wrz Attachment A; SWPPP Site Speclflc f cement CivilSite Civii5ite Civggite _ w Rw f.w.��.o..�. •�. r '^AMA Ciyil5ite '�k!Sl.L1..i.RM.+.u_ryIM1Yl.Z!kN'w tau �a _ CiyilSite _ p. r.r� �*�.� +...• D.. d+ rrw.r....1.r. n .�r.rra�rr.�rDrr..�.a.r.rra.ea rrr..a Illfhr..V Y.I.4 y.p1 wrw.awl0riurw w1hYrl.r h.w..iA p..rt rR a rrr�.r•r.�s.w•�rr Dr. ■r cr a.rnrtrM.��.»«... •rr.a w.w�.a. w..w..�. r.ar rr.rrr. N-0 CvilSite R R b -!!t. p CiVilSite _ 2iaallie�yl'�kA.9 �` � .r vws para R.ra.rswr. � Nler.htr Ri.Ryh. LAKE Wfi 1EVELOPMIENT. LLE I m "E LIONARY SNPPP .ATTACHMENTS SW1.4 ATTACHMENT 6 SWPPP PNSPECTION FOAM l iy4!Si e 0,r -= ATTACHMENT 0! Construction Storm ater Inspection Checklist --..rw..r.w. Irle. rNr.tl.+ re.4. t..ra r.w •.rr� L_M.�_awr.wrr..Pw.�nMJGRrw.r/rir II d-.. G_. �iVi1�lte _ Sr/rr.Rrrrrl p`s.4Cr .r..rr.r.....�� 3 IL ..+eirr.rerrex"rw¢ _._rte.......-'....+..w� —__. ti o ...r.rr4rrr.. r.r.. i wr..es.r-r.rrry+..rrnr..R.�w�rti•..rr �•�P rilr®s rrr�r.r�....r�a r r• rn r... rr..y ./ O`.. Or• +. prvr .rr.�.rrrM 6.. pr re! G.r pr err• pr pr civasite 6790 ATTACHMENT C MAINTENANCE FLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM CivilSite LADE WEST FI..YBblf 6 err•. r..r�.,......x... ...:...�..:.4.:r... Mr�....._ M a. *MM.a .rM [w[r b wy r+& w W Mt raw DEVEIAPMENT. 11C rwrn.ade arra« raM wwr. bi.ra b w.a, .1..'l.tl b+rYbrfr n4.rw rte+. .1.r, Y.rrrrR re1r...M #bn nw M mrw.l rr.6n M vmw.4. rwrtrmr...r nM.Y+<W M..wr.E [.rW.ee.11uu} war 2.lrp rNr d kr. r..rw. d.lva wb n.. r M WM..ir+Y eW, .Y wr.La n..4.e .err vw... n..nw4 lrwm nwwr44awa wary a M'4Frt I w.xa r.a•ww. w w...�.y++.r+....w. w......a •� n. �r1+..n e... ra. a..4 wnr�r.ri.a Are.a.Ap rr..a..w.sraw....�..r.n..:ra......r. .re.R w..,..w... •a er..ww..m �r+r. wwrsr r �.�.. r J ti+w4ww.bbsrn M.ieF. M...fwrn M.rtw.NVA ne F' r+•r.r.....,..e. A4w d...�wr.ra.ww.. w.rr Z YarJ,W LU w'Y4ia.®9e.rww..Ma'M..w�cWr r..r r...r br......�. r.r..r4. r.. 4.10 W ' 2 � j 0j i LU PvUSite C 1> >_ :s ❑ - .rM .nixwY•n L Y> '�aa.wc .p•ws.swnd4v.rm. In W.ry.M.wpr.w arN rl anrn•..n..vfrLlw4b.....1'u. n..rrws.e..q.r.ra� C LU [i.ayroa..v�....xra ra M.y.a9wrwvr... � ria• • Ira.w�. M.I.rr...M lM rw.r, Mw.MV 1 . 4" m.aa.. 1 PRELIMINARY SW1.51 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 15 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-40 — Matthew & Angela Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, CUP & 2nd Driveway Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department's Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. This application is regarding approval of a CUP for grading. Also consideration for approval of a 2nd driveway access onto Smith Avenue to access a lower level garage. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received and considered to be complete on April 17th. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on June 16, 2018. 3. Background/ Summary. The applicants are planning to construct a new residence on the property. Their grading plan involves the import of approximately 250 cubic yards of soil with a total site disturbance balance of approximately 815 cubic yards. Grading and filling activities in excess of 500 cubic yards require a CUP. The new home is proposed to have an upper, main garage, as well as a lower garage to accommodate their desired number of vehicles on site. They are also requesting approval of a 2nd driveway access on to Smith Avenue to access the lower garage. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On May 21St, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. There were neighbors present expressing concerns about the potential for the construction project to adversely impact their narrow street. The comments from the public are detailed in the draft PC minutes attached as Exhibit C. The Commission was advised that any conditions be directly tied to the conditional use. Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 on a motion to approve the requested CUP. The Planning Commission did not discuss or make a recommendation on the 2' driveway access request. Public Comment. Comments from the neighbors were received during the public hearing; no written comments were received. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff discussed the stated neighborhood concerns with the applicants and asked them to consider proactive solutions, including parking restrictions, and/or off street parking during the duration of the project. The applicants have requested the City post the street "no parking" on one side of Smith Avenue in order to maintain an open roadway during the construction, their request is attached as Exhibit D. Staff recommends approval of the CUP. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should direct staff to draft a resolution regarding the conditional use pen -nit and the 2' driveway. Exhibits Exhibit A. Proposed Plans Exhibit B. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit C. Applicants' Parking Request Prepared By: YYIGG Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb AGENDA ITEM Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 05/21/18 Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Applicants' Narrative Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed House Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Proposed Retaining Wall Plans Exhibit F. City Engineer Comments Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map Prepared By: YYIGG Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 61, except the southwesterly 15 feet thereof, and Lot 62, ORONO OCHARDS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 5. It should be noted that this survey was done under snow and ice conditions and that all improvements may or may not have been shown correctly. While we did our best to locate all improvements under the snow and ice, we can't be sure that all improvements were shown. Please look over the survey to be sure everything you need shown is shown correctly. 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 7. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 8. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. 9. While we show the building setback lines per the City of Orono web site, we suggest you show this survey to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback lines are shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this survey to design anything for this site. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "0" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. • A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. • If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an as built" survey shall be done per City of Orono requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. X 990•? X 9896 x,990------ 990.0 -__ '\\� \ PROPOSED ELEVA TIONS X g89 9 I FIRST FLOOR (SUB -FLOOR) = 991.40 1 - - -99° - - � TOP OF FOUNDA TION = 989.6 7 X 990.3 I I BASEMENT FLOOR = 981.00 I \ \ I \ - \ � 9890 UPPER GARAGE FLOOR = 989.21 INSTALL SILT LOWER GARAGE FLOOR = 979.54 988.7 \ ; FENCE/B/0 ROLL Fo° 12" » 14" \ \ \ 099016" X 9$\9.4X 987.6 \ I \ \ 6- 991.1 0991. \ vlj � 09918 9915X 9 \ � �"�� 10" 987.1 1 1 Q1-- INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION \ \ \ 099 .7 \ \ \ X 985.5 , ENTRANCE PER NOTES \ 0991.3 6„ \� 9 , \ \ 6" \ 12" �i' 92.1 \ , \8 88.3 ( X 984.8 ' 993.4 , 9 2.1 \ \ � 0993.2 �\ QV f^'+� 0991.6 SF S I � / \ 0� .1 \� 995.0 9Qr 2. 8 \ 9g4, ��? i 14 , n9 v v \ h, -9v \ 6" 9 ` \ � x 982 �s r-- INSTALL SILT 14 \ 129,941 '� 12" \ 0991.5 `< j6 \\` W 983. i 1_ ' FENCE/5/0 ROLL X �5 \ 12" ,' -0990.0 �4" % 91. \ 981.7 ----/ X89 ��,� 6���� CCS „ 10» ( 991.1 \V A \ ,' - ' - - T - THE COMBINA TION OF PROPOSED DRI AEWA YS s \" 979 2 x I IS NOT POSSIBLE DUE TO GRADE CHANGES IN \� o SMITH A VENUE AND PROPOSED HOUSE X30" \ eta 8 09382 �\ , \0990 3 . 8 \ \ \ \ \ 098s.� / \ \ \\ ' ^0988.1 \ 10„ 9B5 \ \ \ \ 9� ��, �� LAYOUT. THE CITY MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE \ AND LOT DEPTH/SETBACK DISTANCES ,3B" � � 6„ vvv 10"�09894�� � -18.0__ ���\\A i`1+•�` 92�'�^oa� � OF TRIC T DRI M/NAT/N. 989.6 LSO ES CSD E COB 0 098 \ 6"\8.1 \ / \ \ \ \\✓ / ^ X 989 6 9B6 \ \ 978 4 \ r \ \ \ \ ` - 979. \ \ 0985.4 \ �� 6 \ \ X( 989• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SETBACK-�____ - X85 �,K r,s 9 .1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LINE (TYP)� �- - 9 4 10 - ► 6» \\\\\ 9�R `-PROPOSED X 9 978 i \ INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION 8 84 7 Bey Op 98% ENTRANCE PER NOTES \ \ \ 367 - -iwf �\/ a b X977 ��� 71 \-y82\\� 113 - 98 ^ > �i�' - -�� \ _ �- g0 , 3 3 \ \ \ \\ �&79,1_ `�0 0 \ �� o -,6,37 1� Q\ s 9rn �� 97 A 6l 8.8 8"� �6\886'7\,'6„ �/ - - _ ! ��0 \ ti 3.9 �� \ 9 i�, 97:9t�r- - �Qo 76.4 'S'��'7C,h \ \ \ +,.�' \ 9 5 ep 975.2 9'e 8" 9797 �� 982.1 .1 Q \ . 9 0 997: �brr X76 9�s s \�74 7\ \ \ \ ;� " 98u 9 �� 82 2 �-9,f h0 �' �c 7 7 Sok 97 2 x 975 2 l � 96' .7 V 0" \ \ 9781 i 981.3 16, 2. �� , CD 7,� Y % 0 " 9 1.9 Q On + �97� Oh�r DR��W A �` s s 97s.4 2 0'' \ 0 cy ORIVEWAY�, �. � 6n a �, Q" �� \�Sy4' \9 809 8 ` �QIV 8.5 X 9768PROPOSED 0 X \ V v V vs� \ E97 �,,' e x 77.4 V 01 6 \ \ \� \ \ may\\ \ \ �f,�„�974 � h1y' 9,90 �s� \ \, \ \ � INSTALL SIL T- .i9B9.2t�r \ \ \ \ \ \ FENCE/BIO ROLL9'9 - - - - - _ DWELLING T9.4b�r \ /1 s'c� / �` 9,3.2 x A.984.8t 0 X 979.3 X ` '1'c 0 0 9�9.Ob�r \ x 97- 14- 7 \ 9�s�8 \ \\ �.0 ,'��` �� i 18" 79.4�fi�� \ \ \ i i� 09764 �fi� I\ 12 9 \ \ \ \ y 6'o PROPOSED JV _ _ / \ �\ f' / -INSTALL SILT h `' ' ,� QO / ^� / � / FENCE/B/O ROLL \ X 9794 \ �� V A �.' efly X 9797.9� C)� / ' ywd9 2 ,' �\ , . 978.8 INSTALL SILT- 18' FENCE/B/O ROLL I �?�' ��\ X 979.1 I s� X 979.410 s ao l S� '' 0`i 78.6 10,F` 9 0979, \ /) <--- \ X 978.1 17� i \ 9)9 foo \\ EXISTING CONTOUR - - - 9 80 - EXISTING SPOT LLEV,4.rI01V X 980.5 EXISTING HARDCOVER PROPOSED HARDCOVER PROPOSED CONTOUR 960 House 2,281 Sq. Ft. House 3,536 Sq. Ft. Driveway 435 Sq. Ft. Driveways 3,367 Sq. Ft. PROPOSLIJ SPOT L7 EV4TIONf 980.5 Porch 183 Sq. Ft. Front Porch 224 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 458 Sq. Ft. Rear Screen Porch 224 Sq. Ft. Retaining Walls 64 Sq. Ft. Walk 111 Sq. Ft. P_RAINAGLI ARR0#r - FLOK Shed 85 Sq. Ft. Retaining Walls 50 Sq. Ft. SILT FLNCL/BIO ROLL SF TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,506 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 75512 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 30,770 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 30,770 Sq. Ft. TRLL' RLr110DAL 0 DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 4/17/18 REMOVED PROP. DECK & ADDED DRIVE DIMENSIONS PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 11.40 DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE N SCALE - 1" = 20' 0 20' 40' PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 24.4% CLIENT NAME / JOB ADDRESS ANGIE HOPPING 95 SMITH A VENUE ORONO, MN Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 1 ❑❑1 I Highwa MinnetonCia, Minnesota 553 5 ❑hone E1D5❑❑❑❑❑ E:6❑ We❑ www.ad1:8ur.co11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSION AL_E�GINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES2TA. / /1 , LIUCIVJC IVU. A RIL 13, ❑01 ❑ DATE DATE SUR❑EYED: ANUARY ❑q ❑01 ❑ I SHEET TITLE SUR❑EYED BY AD❑ANCED SUR EYING. 1 ENG., CO. DATE DRAFTED: ARIL 13, _011_ PROPOSED SURVEY DRAWING NUMBER 180158 JR SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 CUCCT Kir) S1 SHEET 1 OF 1 LEFT ELE VA TION SCALE: 1/8"- 1 ' KCF HOMF PF516N, INC, HA5 MAPS EVERY FFFOI:T F05503� rO fOPWVIPF A CCW,CT Sff OF WOI?KIN6 Pl AWINGS, THS CONTI'ZACTOP/ NOME OWNF1? MUST VF JKY & CNFCK ALS NOTFS, 17FrAL5, & RAWINGS & NOrIFY KCF HOMF b�51GN OF ANY �FFOS 010, OMISSIONS 13ff01?� CONSTRUCTION, KCI' NOME 12�5I6N A55UW5 NO F,E:5FON51131UITI�5 FOF, 5TI?UCTUM OI? PWN510NAL �10,I'Op5 Of: OM15510N5, NO WA RANM5 E XFFZF55 OF, IMFLIEV INCLUPING COMPIIANC� OF THIS DUAN WITH AFFI CVLU PUU 21NG COPF 1?�QUIRWM NT5 AF,� MAP�XC�F-r TH05F IN W2111NG 51CMP PY THE MAK�p, IL me 13OX our 6A3�F5 6'' WITH (3f?ACKFr5 LF SNAKE 51PIN6 UNPFFI IN 6A6L�5 A5 13OMP & PATTEN SHOWN 51PIN6 104L rojlANlL\ I?OOF V�NrS A5 ,�Q' n 12 �8 ASPNALr 5KNGL�S 8'' LP LAP 51121 NG BA CK ELE VA TION SCALE: 118"- 1 ' FALSU ropWI? 3 30 X 30 5rA, WI NPOWS PAINT IN5112F GI -A55 OPAQUE 8" LP LAP 51171NG A5 5HOWN u �I� F- I Soll MWERM Me KCP HOME DESIGN, INC. 7516 77TH STREET 952-474-4152 CHASKA, MN 55318 CELL: 612-419-7896 e mail: kcpdesignOq. com MIN, 4" NIGH NOUS NUMI3�F,5 FRONT ELE VA TION SCALE: 1/4"-1 ' CULTUI2�17 SrON� V�N�W W-1 P`i N ca - 6 tL 8" LP LAP 51f71N6 RIGHT ELE VA TION SCALE: 1/8"=1' A,UMINUM 5OFFIr ANb FASCIA 6'' VIM 13OAQ25 Ar COPN�125 & AP,OUNP 17001?5 & WIN12OWS 8" LF LAP 511'2IN6 A'OUN12 FEOM�1�p A5 SHOWN 1'I?FLIMINAI?Y PLANS FOf,131b5 ONLY NOr FOP, CON511?UCrION MA TT & ANGIE HOPPING COPYRIGHT C2018 STREET ADDRESS DATE 95 SWITH AVENUE 3-14-18 kapdesign CITY, STATE REVISED ORONO, AIN 4-17-18 SHEET DEVELOPMENT SQ. PT. ORONO OCHARDS ' OP PLAN NUMBER LOT61-INLOCIC COUNTY: HENNEPIN D4953 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 3. LA18-000040 MATTHEW AND ANGELA HOPPING, 95 SMITH AVENUE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:35 P.M. — 6:58 P.M. The applicant was not present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for grading over 500 cubic yards. Also as part of this plan the applicant is requesting City Council approval of a second driveway access onto Smith Avenue to access a lower level garage. The applicants are redeveloping the subject property and constructing a new residence. Their grading plan involves the import of approximately 250 cubic yards of soil with a total site disturbance balance of approximately 815 cubic yards. The new home is proposed to have an upper, main garage, as well as a lower garage to accommodate their desired number of vehicles on site. The proposed new home is more in keeping with the immediate neighborhood. Staff has provided an analysis of the conditional use permit criteria in the report and individual criteria can be discussed if the Planning Commission wishes. To accomplish the desired home and the tuck -under garage, the grade must be adjusted with fill in the area between the house and the road on the northeast side. The proposed home will have a first -floor garage elevated above the current grades by approximately seven feet and the lower level garage floor will be set within a foot or so of the existing grade. The property is situated along Smith Avenue. According to City Code, one driveway approach is permitted per property. In addition to the conditional use permit, the City Council will need to grant approval to allow the second driveway approach. This requirement is not within the zoning code and therefore a public hearing for this type of variance is not necessary, but the City Council shall consider the second driveway request when the conditional use permit is reviewed. Curtis stated the City has not received any written public comments regarding this application but that she did speak with a couple of the neighbors regarding the grading plan and that Staff can meet with them and the applicant to discuss the plan further if they desire. Planning Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1. City Engineer and Watershed District shall approve the erosion control plan. 2. The street swept daily or as needed to keep debris off of Smith Avenue. 3. The applicant must conform to the City's and MCWD's erosion control regulations. 4. Only clean fill to be imported to the site. 5. Conformance with the City Engineer's requirements at the time of the building permit. 6. Hauling shall occur during allowed construction hours only Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on weekends and holidays. 7. Contractor shall post a contact number and be able to respond to complaints in a timely fashion. Curtis noted the applicant is unable to be here this evening due to a family emergency. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Dan Carlson, applicant's representative, stated the reason the extra dirt is going to be moved is because the current home is in front of the front yard setback and the house needs to be demolished and that area filled. Curtis noted they are proposing to raise the area adjacent to the street to accommodate the access on the lower level as well as having a main garage access. Carlson noted part of the fill is due to the old foundation. Thiesse pointed out it also appears there is a significant amount of fill for the driveway up behind the retaining wall. Carlson agreed some fill will be necessary for the driveway. Carlson stated there are already three other neighbors in the area that have a second driveway access. Curtis noted that would be an issue for the City Council and not the Planning Commission. Landgraver asked if the applicant is in agreement with the recommendations listed in the Staff report. Carlson indicated they are. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:41 p.m. Ryan Blackwell, 80 Smith Avenue, stated they live across the street from this property and that they have three concerns. Blackwell asked where the second driveway is going to be in relation to his driveway. Blackwell noted there is a corner approximately 100 feet down the street from his driveway. Curtis illustrated the approximate location of the driveway and noted it will not be directly across from Mr. Blackwell's driveway. Curtis stated the applicant is not showing any grading in that area except for minimal grading and the removal of trees. Curtis noted the heavy lines on the plan depict the new grades. Blackwell stated in front of the house right now and all the way down the property line there is approximately a seven to eight -foot berm. Blackwell stated if the berm is capped at seven feet and the house is built on top of that, he has a concern that he will be in a valley since the other house is raised three feet. Curtis indicated the applicant is not proposing to grade anything beyond the driveway. Blackwell asked if the driveway will be cut through the berm. Curtis indicated it will be and that the grade beyond the driveway is not proposed to be raised. Thiesse asked if it is a single -story house. Curtis stated it is. Curtis stated the house itself will be taller on the property but the grade from the house to the road is not going to be changed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse noted the house footprint is at the right elevation, but the house floor will be pretty much at grade from where the house is currently sitting. Blackwell stated the road between the two homes is approximately 20 feet wide with no curbs and that he has a question for how they can go about getting some kind of parking plan in place or a plan for getting vehicles in and out. Blackwell indicated it is a safety concern given the children in the area. Blackwell commented he does not know what the precedent is with projects like this and whether a parking plan is created but that in his view that should be addressed. Blackwell stated there are a lot of issues on Lyman currently with vehicles that come in and that this winter the city plow ripped up all the sod near the corner and that he had to replace it this year. Blackwell stated he would rather have a good conversation about it and that he would like to understand the rules for moving vehicles in and out. Thiesse stated right now it would be nothing more than city enforcement and that construction traffic would only occur during the permitted construction hours. Blackwell asked whether there would be any limitations on whether parking would be allowed on both sides of the street. Thiesse noted if vehicles are parked on both sides, emergency vehicles might not be able to make it through. Barnhart stated typically in a variance application request parking is not addressed and that perhaps the neighbors could submit a petition to the City requesting parking be limited to one side of the street. Thiesse asked whether the conditional use permit will still happen if the City Council is not going to grant the second driveway access. Curtis stated the second access is very important to the applicant but that it is unclear whether there is another way to resolve that. Staff encouraged the applicant to explore another option and the applicant's engineer tried to come up with a different solution as well. Curtis stated the applicant did attempt to address it without having a second driveway. Carlson stated the second driveway is not feasible unless all the trees are removed due to the steepness of the area. Carlson indicated the applicant has a work van that he wants to park in the lower garage and that the proposed location is about the only spot the engineer could determine. Theodore Bonnett, 40 and 45 Smith Avenue, stated there is unpermitted work going on at the property this evening and that he has talked to the neighbors 40 to 60 times as well as spoken with Staff about various issues. Bonnett stated when he tries to get home, the construction workers look at him like he is the issue because they have to move their trucks. Bonnett stated in his view Barnhart has not done a good job at 60 Smith and that even though that project supposedly finished a year ago, things are still happening on the property. Bonnett stated he is just asking for some help to mitigate this from happening again. Bonnett stated when the police do show up, they do a great job, but that it took around 19 calls to the police station and staff before they came out. Bonnett stated he does not want to bother the Planning Commission about this problem and that he wanted to broker a solution even before work at 60 Smith started, which did not happen. Bonnett noted a fire truck MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. or a police car would not be able to get down the street if there are cars parked on both sides, which is an issue, and that the neighbors are asking the Planning Commission for some help on it. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission is limited in what it can do and that the Planning Commission can recommend approval of the conditional use permit with specific conditions. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission has no control over people parking legally or illegally on the road and that they cannot incorporate that into a conditional use permit. Barnhart noted these are items that are related to another application. Bonnett stated those same issues could occur at this property, which is why he is here. Thiesse stated he is taking one instance and saying this applicant and contractor are going to operate the same way. Bonnett requested they incorporate the neighbors' concerns in their recommendations. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Landgraver stated the conditional use permit for the earth moving is fine. Libby stated it is very evident that a long-standing requirement of Orono would be met that anytime a new driveway is solved, adequate turnaround space is provided. Libby stated he does not see that having with the lower driveway. Curtis pointed out there is a hammerhead backup area provided for both driveways and that a turnaround is not required except for when accessing county roads or busier thoroughfares, which is when the City would require a turnaround. Thiesse stated he may have misspoke earlier and that the grade is going to be higher but not on the north end. Ressler noted what the Planning Commission is discussing is really the earth work. Landgraver moved, Ressler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000040, Matthew and Angela Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, granting of a conditional use permit, with the seven recommendations of Staff. Landgraver encouraged the neighbors to attend the City Council meeting where the driveway will be discussed. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. From: Angela Hopping To: Melanie Curtis Subject: 95 Smith Ave. Construction parking Date: Friday, May 25, 2018 10:29:27 AM Melanie, Yes, I would like to officially request signage during the construction of our home, to restrict parking on our side of Smith Ave. only. Thank you. Sincerely, Angie Hopping Sent from Outlook Date Application Received: 04/17/18 Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/17/18 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 06/16/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 21 May 2018 Subject: #LA18-000040, Matthew & Angela Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for grading over 500 cubic yards. Also as part of this plan the applicant is requesting City Council approval of a 2nd driveway access onto Smith Avenue to access a lower level garage. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the grading plan; the City Council will review the 2nd driveway request at the time of the CUP. Background The applicants are redeveloping the subject property and constructing a new residence. Their grading plan involves the import of approximately 250 cubic yards of soil with a total site disturbance balance of approximately 815 cubic yards. Grading and filling activities in excess of 500 cubic yards require a CUP. The new home is proposed to have an upper, main garage, as well as a lower garage to accommodate their desired number of vehicles on site. The RR -113 setbacks, existing site topography, proposed home and grading plan, and their need to accommodate access to the lower garage results in the request for both the conditional use permit (CUP) for grading and the second driveway onto Smith Avenue. LOT ANALYSIS Section 78-420 - Setbacks: RR -1B Required Proposed Front 50' 50' Rear 50' 51' North Side 30' 30' South Side 30' 80' Section78- 420 - Lot Area/Width: RR -1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 30,770 s.f. (0.70 acre) 200' FILE #LA18-000040 21 May 2018 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1403- Structural Coveraee. Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 30,770 s.f. (0.70 acre) Allowed: 6,154 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 3,984 s.f. (12.9%) Applicable Regulations: Second Driveway Approach (Section 18-136 (a)) The property is situated along Smith Avenue; the applicants have proposed a second driveway access to accommodate a lower level secondary garage. According to City Code Section 18-136 (a) one driveway approach is permitted per property. In addition to the CUP, the City Council will need to grant approval to allow a 2nd driveway approach. This requirement is not within the zoning code therefore a public hearing for this type of "variance" is not necessary; the City Council shall consider the second driveway request when the CUP is reviewed. Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-91 The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; the intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature, is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property, and is compliant with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; the proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; this statement is true. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; this statement is true. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; this statement is true. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; this criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood. The re -grading of the Property will be more in conformance with the neighborhood and allow the new home to be constructed within the setbacks. Once completed, the grading will have no impact on surrounding lands. The grades, once vegetated and landscaped should not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the proposed grading will allow for a garage entry on the main level and to accommodate a lower level garage which is not out of character for the neighborhood. It is likely FILE #LA18-000040 21 May 2018 Page 3 of 4 adjacent properties will not be impacted. The site grading will be reviewed and monitored closely by the City's engineer to assure that all existing drainage patterns are maintained and adjacent properties are not adversely impacted. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; This standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area or have an adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, importing the fill and active grading of the Property may have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust, vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; the finished grade will be vegetated and landscaped; it should blend into the Property and the neighboring properties. The project, once completed, should not result in undesirable views requiring mitigation. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; see #9 above. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; the applicants shall be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; This standard requires that the project be designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The long term effect of the project should result in minimal environmental impacts. The project will be monitored by the City, and MCWD to prevent erosion from the site. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The applicants will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are FILE #LA18-000040 21 May 2018 Page 4 of 4 observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis The applicant is proposing to change the nature of the property to support a new home. The proposed housing style is more in keeping with the immediate neighborhood. To accomplish the desired home (and the tuck under garage), the grade must be adjusted with fill in the area between the house and the road on the northeast side. The proposed home will have a first floor garage elevated above the current grades by approximately 7 feet; the lower level garage floor will be set within a foot or so of the existing grade. Engineer Comments The City Engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose additional conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. City engineer and watershed district shall approve the erosion control plan. 2. The street swept daily, or as needed, to keep debris off of Smith Avenue. 3. The applicant must conform to the City's and MCWD's erosion control regulations. 4. Only clean fill to be imported to the site. 5. Conformance with the City Engineer's requirements at the time of the building permit. 6. Hauling shall occur during allowed construction hours only Monday through Friday 7 am to 8 pm (and between 8 am and 8 pm on weekends and holidays). 7. Contractor shall post a contact number and be able to respond to complaints in a timely fashion. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Applicants' Narrative Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed House Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Proposed Retaining Wall Plans Exhibit F. City Engineer Comments Exhibit G. Property Owners List Exhibit H. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 16 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-41, City of Orono Text Amendment: Gate Opacity - Ordinance Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department's Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. This application is regarding a change to the regulations for driveway entrance gates. 2. Background/ Summary. Gates at driveways are permitted, but must meet certain conditions, including a five foot setback from all property lines when associated with entrance monuments. Gates and entrance monuments are permitted up to 8 feet in height. Fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street, except in the yard abutting a County Highway on a lakeshore lot, where the maximum height is 6 feet. Fences may be privacy in nature (100% opaque). Additionally with this amendment, staff is proposing a formatting modification regarding gates in locations where entrance monuments do not exist. In these instances gates would not be permitted to extend higher than the permitted fence. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On May 21, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the draft ordinance provided by Staff which contemplated removing the requirement for transparency. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 on a motion to modify the proposed ordinance amendment to permit gates to have up to 75% opacity (25% transparent/open). The dissenting Commissioner felt that there should not be a requirement for transparency. 4. Public Comment. Comments from the public were received during the public hearing; the minutes are attached as Exhibit C. The resident was requesting no limitation on gate opacity. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED. Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance — Option A: No opacity limit Exhibit B. Draft Ordinance — Option B: 75% opacity limit Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 05/21/18 Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. City Code 78-1405 - Current Exhibit C. Neighboring Cities' Regulations Prepared By: YYIGG Reviewed By: J Barnhart Approved By: -Sb ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO GATES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-1405 Nonencroachments shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1405. - Nonencroachments. (a) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard setback requirements: (9) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered non encroachments when they conform with the following standards: a. Each monument, with a maximum of two per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; C. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with section 78-1467; e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 and at the discretion of the planning director. i. A building permit is required for installation and the property corners must be located for inspection purposes. 10 Gates,-Fwhen a gate is proposed, must meet the following requirements must be met: a. 4-. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and b. 2-. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and c. 8- Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and d. 4. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met (if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405(8), and e. 6-. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and f. 7-. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved, traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking. A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO GATES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-1405 Nonencroachments shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1405. - Nonencroachments. (a) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard setback requirements: (9) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered non encroachments when they conform with the following standards: a. Each monument, with a maximum of two per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; C. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with section 78-1467; e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 and at the discretion of the planning director. i. A building permit is required for installation and the property corners must be located for inspection purposes. 10 Gates,-Fwhen a gate is proposed, must meet the following requirements must be met: a. 4-. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and b. 2-. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and c. 8- Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and d. 4. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met (if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405(8), and e. Gates must maintain an opacity level of no greater than 25 75 percent, and f. 6-. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and g_ 7-. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved, traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking. A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 5. LA18-000041 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT— GATES, 7:07 P.M. — 7:33 P.M. Curtis stated Staff has been asked to review the regulations regarding entrance gates and the City's required 75 percent transparency minimum. Gates at driveways are permitted but must meet certain conditions, including a 5 -foot setback from all property lines. Gates and entrance monuments are permitted up to eight feet in height and fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street. A 6 -foot fence is allowed in a yard abutting a county highway on a lakeshore lot. Fences may be 100 percent opaque. Staff has provided a draft ordinance for Planning Commission review and comment. The draft ordinance removes the requirement for transparency. In addition, the draft ordinance proposes a formatting modification for gates to be permitted where entrance monuments do not exist. In these instances gates would not be permitted to extend higher than the permitted fence. Thiesse noted the requirement for a building permit has been struck in the draft ordinance and asked whether it is still required. Curtis indicated she added it as Item i under Item 9 and eliminated it under Item l Of(i) in the draft ordinance. Curtis stated the gate does not require a building permit but monuments do. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Gerald Ferrer, 1560 Hunter Drive, stated he is building a house at 980 Heritage Lane and that he wanted to add a gate to the driveway. Ferrer indicated in the beginning he did not know the opaqueness rules and came up with some designs that were then shown to Mr. Barnhart. Ferrer stated he would like to know why the gates needs to be 25 percent opaque and 75 percent open since the gate is for security and privacy. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission will be discussing that this evening and making a recommendation to the City Council. Ferrer stated at certain cases he can see the need for some openness but at his property all someone has to do is walk around the monuments. Ferrer asked whether the requirements will be changed. Barnhart stated the direction from the City Council is to remove that requirement and that it will likely be on the June 11 City Council agenda. Ferrer stated he was not sure whether it has something to do with people possibly getting hurt but that technology has evolved and that most gates will have sensors preventing the gate from closing on someone. Ferrer noted gates also have to hinge from behind the back so when the gate closes, nothing can be crunched between the gate and the pillar. Libby stated he recently dealt with a gate in his neighborhood and that in talking to traffic engineers and police officers, they indicated the opacity is sometimes really more important for line of sight for people turning out. Libby noted there are a lot of people walking in this area and the opaqueness makes it easier for drivers to see pedestrians. Ferrer noted the gates have to open in toward the residence. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Libby stated it was more about visibility and how monuments could potentially obstruct someone's line of sight. Libby commented there are a lot of components and moving targets when dealing with safety. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Ressler asked if these rules are unique to Orono. Curtis indicated some cities will not allow gates and other cities require a certain opacity and that it tends to be a community preference. Curtis noted she included some information from neighboring communities in the packet. Thiesse noted someone can run a fence right up to a monument that is 100 percent opaque. Thiesse stated in his view limiting the amount of opaqueness is a good idea. Seals asked whether the police and fire departments have weighed in on this. Curtis stated the police and fire departments have indicated they want to be able to access the gate in the event of an emergency. Curtis noted the lock box requirement is not changing under the draft ordinance. Landgraver stated to his understanding the original intent was to prevent a monotony along the streets and that during the Comprehensive Plan update, they have heard a lot about the openness of Orono. Landgraver questioned whether the City should be encouraging people to construct that type of barricade and that perhaps keeping some transparency or visibility would be a good idea. Landgraver asked who is going to measure the opacity and what will determine the right amount. Landgraver stated he does not have a good answer for that. Lemke commented he would like to see a little visibility to the gate since it helps to improve the appearance of the gate. Lemke stated the 25 percent makes sense for the opaqueness. Thiesse noted the City is not stopping someone from making the gate more transparent and that the ordinance would just allow somebody to have a little more privacy. Thiesse asked how many gates there are in Orono. Curtis indicated she did not do an inventory but that there are quite a few. Ressler stated he is okay with it being a lesser number and that requiring a gate to have 25 percent openness into a property where there is a privacy fence around the entire property still affords a lot of privacy. Ferrer stated in his situation it is open area with a driveway that has a gate and that it should be something that is subjective since every situation is different rather than just black and white. Barnhart stated the City has to make the language black and white rather than subjective. Barnhart commented this might be a little bit like a solution in search of a problem. Staff has provided some research from other cities and it is all over the board. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission can debate whether it should be 35, 50, or 75 percent, but that he would like to avoid a situation where the City does not know what they are trying to achieve. Barnhart stated the direction from the City Council was to remove sections from the Code that were not needed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated he appreciates the explanation. Ressler stated he has these thoughts about driving down a narrow road with trucks coming in and out and there are all these privacy fences. Ressler stated from his perspective it is good to have a little bit of visibility but that he is also in agreement with simplifying, which might be somewhat conflicted. Thiesse asked how far off the right-of-way the gate has to be. Curtis indicated monuments must be five feet off the traveled roadway and property lines and gates should be 10 feet from the traveled roadway. Libby stated this is a neighborhood that is heavily wooded and there really is not any fencing except for some split rail fences. Libby asked whether this is a privacy issue. Thiesse noted the ordinance would be city-wide. Lemke commented someone can always request a variance. Barnhart noted it is hard to argue practical difficulty on an accessory structure. Seals stated he likes the idea of a simpler code and that perhaps the City should have some trust in the citizens that they will do the right thing. Erickson noted there was mention about emergency access and that he was wondering if gates can be set up mechanically to allow access and what happens if there is a power outage. Curtis stated the fire department requested a lock box at the time the original ordinance was adopted and that requirement would remain. Ferrer stated there is also something called a YELP mode and that the gate will open up if the siren is loud enough. Thiesse commented 25 percent from 100 percent is a big step. Landgraver stated the reason for rules and regulations is to prevent ambiguity and to require people to go through a process. Landgraver stated he is in agreement with simplifying the ordinance but that he is not okay with just simply rolling the dice and seeing what happens. Ressler agreed with Commissioner Landgraver. Thiesse stated he would rather than visit the issue a year from now to see if there are any issues. Lemke asked what prompted this ordinance change. Barnhart indicated it was due to the request of the gentleman in the audience as well as the Mayor, who has asked Staff to take a look at it. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated his recommendation to the Council would be that there still be some opaqueness but that he is not sure of the number. Landgraver suggested the Planning Commission recommend approving the draft ordinance but maintaining some level of transparency. Landgraver suggested the City Council come up with a number they feel is appropriate. Landgraver moved, Ressler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000041, City of Orono Text Amendment, Gate Opacity, with language being incorporated allowing an opacity level no greater than 75 percent. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Seals Opposed. To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner VYIGG Date: 21 May 2018 Subject: #LA18-000041, City of Orono Text Amendment: Gate Opacity Public Hearing Application Summary: The City is considering an ordinance that would remove the transparency requirement from the entrance gate regulation. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should consider the proposed change. Background Staff has been asked to review the regulations regarding entrance gates and the City's required 75% transparency minimum (no more than 25% opaque). Gates at driveways are permitted, but must meet certain conditions, including a five foot setback from all property lines when associated with entrance monuments. Gates and entrance monuments are permitted up to 8 feet in height. Fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street, except in the yard abutting a County Highway on a lakeshore lot, where the maximum height is 6 feet. Fences may be privacy in nature (100% opaque). Originally, the opacity requirement seems to suggest a concern to prevent rows of 6-8 foot high privacy fences dominating the streetscape along Orono roadways; and to ensure the ability to see through the gate, and adjacent traffic when maneuvering through the gate area. The Planning Commission should discuss whether these concerns are still relevant, if not, a change is in order. After review of gate regulations in neighboring communities, where gates are regulated, the regulations are not consistent. The draft ordinance removes the requirement for transparency. Additionally, the draft ordinance proposes a formatting modification for gates to be permitted where entrance monuments do not exist. In these instances gates would not be permitted to extend higher than the permitted fence. Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. City Code 78-1405 - Current Exhibit C. Neighboring Cities' Regulations AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 17 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-42 —City of Orono Text Amendment: Notification Distance for Public Hearings — Ordinance Presenter: Laura Oakden, Agenda Planning Department's City Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. Consider an ordinance that would alter the notification distance for public hearings from 350 feet to 500 feet. 2. Background/ Summary. Consider an ordinance that would alter the notification distance for public hearings from 350 feet to 500 feet. State Statute requires notification of property owners within 350 feet for zoning ordinance amendments. Within the zoning and subdivision chapters, the City also requires a public hearing for all conditional use permits, variances, rezoning requests, comprehensive plan amendments, wetland and subdivision requests. The intent of the notification radii is to inform those property owners that are more likely to be directly impacted by a proposal. All interested parties are notified via the notice in the official paper, and on the city's listserve/ website. The City Council should consider the following items: How residents hear about public hearings and how many give input The increased cost for postage and mailings (currently part of the recently reduced application fee) The impact an application might have on an abutting neighbor verses of neighbor 500 feet away. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed ordinance and found the existing distance to be sufficient. Planning Commission make a unanimous motion to deny the proposed text amendment. See the attached PC Minutes. 4. Public Comment. To date, no public comments have been received. 5. Staff Recommendation. The City Council should review and discuss the proposed changes to the public hearing notification distance. If an amendment is desired, staff also suggests approval of the summary ordinance. The summary ordinance was drafted due to the length, and therefore, cost, of publishing the full ordinance amendment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed text amendment. If the motion is to approve, or approve with modifications, the ordinance amendment, consider a motion to approve the summary ordinance. Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Text Amendment for Distance of Public Hearing Notification Exhibit B. Draft Summary Ordinance Exhibit C. Examples of Notification Maps Exhibit D. Planning Commission Staff Report Exhibit E. Draft PC Minutes Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb96Z Council Exhibit A LA18-000042 ORDINANCE NO. _, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE IV LAND USE PERTAINING TO PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION DISTANCES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-43(b) shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-43. - Adoption and amendment procedure. (b) No zoning ordinance or amendment shall be adopted until a public hearing has been held by the planning commission or by the council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the city not less than ten days prior to the day of the hearing. When an amendment includes changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 500 Meet of the property to which the amendment relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this subsection has been made. SECTION 2. Section 78-48 shall be amended by adding text to read as follows: Sec 78-48. Public Hearing. When required by this ordinance, a public hearing shall be held. (a) A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 500 feet of the property. For the purpose ofig ving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person, and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings_ The failure to give published or mailed notice to individual property owners or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. (b) In addition, a notice shall be published in the official newspaper once at least ten days before the day of the hearing SECTION 3. Section 78-98 shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-98. - Notice of hearing. (a) A public hearing following requirement of Section 78-48 shall be required for an appeal or i ariance. shall be mailed at leas fefe the day of the hearing to eaeh owner- of a— pr-epeAy and pr-opeAy situated wholly or paMy within 350 feet of the pfepeAy. Fo pur-pose of giving mailed nefiee, the per -son r-espensible for- mailing the notiee may reeer-ds to detefmine the names and addresses of owners. A eepy of t hen a list of an- - _. - --the owners and addresses to whieh the netiee was sent shall be attested to b r-esp nsible per -son, and shall be made a part of the r-eeor-ds of the pr-eeeedings. Hot. ifiv-pilid-pite the pr-eeeedings. SECTION 4. Section 78-227(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-227. - Permitted uses. Within any R-lA one -family residential district, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 5. Section 78-252(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-252. - Permitted uses. Within any R -1B one -family residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: lit SECTION 5. Section 78-252(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-252. - Permitted uses. Within any R -1B one -family residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 6. Section 78-302(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-302. - Permitted uses. Within the LR-lA one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. P PVT H Jilii,10 - SECTION 6. Section 78-302(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-302. - Permitted uses. Within the LR-lA one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 7. Section 78-327(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-327. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1B one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. 9 P PVT .11 71 11.1111 f111111 .1m SECTION 7. Section 78-327(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-327. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1B one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. 9 b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 8. Section 78-347(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-347. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1C one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. �ras!ss:Eers. PREMIUM SECTION 8. Section 78-347(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-347. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1C one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 9. Section 78-366(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-366. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1C-1 one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. 4 PREMIUM SECTION 9. Section 78-366(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-366. - Permitted uses. Within the LR -1C-1 one -family lakeshore residential district, no land or structure shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. 4 SECTION 10. Section 78-392(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-392. - Permitted uses. Within any RR-lA one -family rural residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 11. Section 78-417(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-417. - Permitted uses. Within any RR -1B one -family rural residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. 5 M'' 191110 101, SECTION 10. Section 78-392(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-392. - Permitted uses. Within any RR-lA one -family rural residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. SECTION 11. Section 78-417(1)c. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-417. - Permitted uses. Within any RR -1B one -family rural residential district, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) City -owned public service structures that have been approved by the city council after the required public hearings for public improvement projects, provided that: a. All buildings are located at least 50 feet from any adjacent property zoned for residential use. b. The architectural design of the structure is found to be compatible with the surrounding area. 5 SECTION 12. Section 78-567(9) shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-567. - Permit for private improvements within public rights-of-way. It is unlawful for any person to alter, improve or use for private purposes in any RS district any platted public right-of-way, any platted public park, or any other property owned by the city without first obtaining a permit from the council, as follows: (9) Permit hearing and notice. The planning commission or the council shall hold a public hearing or hearings on each application for a permit as required by section 78-48. Netiee of the publie hearing shall be given not less than ten days nor- mo I--. th—An -1 -0 days prior- to the date of the hearing by pikhea4ion in the legal newspaper- fer- the eity. Stleh fietiee shall eon4ain the deseription of the land and the proposed use. At least ten days before hearing, the city eler-k shall mail an identieal notiee to the applicant and to eaeh o pr-epeAy owners within 350 feet of the outside betindar-ies of the land in question. Failure hearing, the planning eonffnission or- the eouneil shall review the appheation and statements a -ad dfawings submitted with the applie4ien and shall r-eeeive pefti evidenee eoneeming the proposed use and the proposed eonditions under- whiek it woi be operated o Maine SECTION 13. Section 78-913(11) shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-913. - Application. Whenever this chapter requires a conditional use permit, an application in writing may be filed with the zoning administrator, together with such filing fee as may be established by the council and shall be accompanied by a site plan and such information and showing as may be necessary or desirable, including but not limited to the following: (11) An abstractor's certified property certificate showing the property owners within 3-5A-500 feet of the outer boundaries of the property in question. SECTION 14. Section 78-915 shall be amended by adding text to read as follows: Sec. 78-915. - Hearings and notice. The planning commission or council may hold a public hearing on each application for a conditional use permit as required by section 78-48. Notiee of the publie hearing shall be given no been made.—At the public hearing the planning commission or the council shall review the application and the statements and drawings submitted with the application and shall receive pertinent evidence concerning the proposed use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. Subject to such limitations as may be imposed by the council, the planning commission or the council may adopt rules for the conduct of proceedings before it. Such rules may include provisions for the giving of oaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefs by the parties. The city shall provide for a record of the proceedings, which shall include the minutes of the meetings, the findings, and the action taken on each matter heard, including the final action. SECTION 15. Section 78-1008(c)4. shall be amended by removing text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1008. - Procedure for processing a planned unit development. (c) Schedule. (4) The planning commission shall conduct the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council.'` otiee of the hearing shall consist of a legal " pow.. deser-iption and a deser-iption of the request, and be p4lished in the offieial newspaper - least ten days prior- to the hearing; and written netifieatien of the hearing shall be mail least ten days prior- to the hearing to ev,%er-s of land within 350 feet of the beundmy of the pr-epeAy in question. SECTION 16. Section 78-1610(a) shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-1610. - Alteration of wetlands. (a) No alteration of land within a wetland overlay district or an existing established wetland buffer is allowed without a wetlands alteration permit, subject to recommendation by the planning commission and approval of the city council. The planning commission must hold a public hearing per Section 78-48.^f*er notifying the pr-opei4y owners within 350 f of of the r pet4 , on Activities that constitute an alteration regulated by this section include changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetlands or its existing established buffer, dredging, or alterations of wetlands or buffer vegetation. Alterations do not include wetland planting or the selective clearing or pruning of trees or vegetation that are dead, diseased, noxious weeds or similar hazards. A wetland alteration permit is not required when a wetland district is rezoned to another zoning classification. SECTION 17. Section 82-2 shall be amended by adding text to the following definition: Sec. 82-2. - Definitions. Public hearing means a hearing to be held by the planning commission to allow for public review and input relating to the proposed subdivision pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.358 -and public hearing requirements in Section 78-48 SECTION 18. Section 82-112 shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 82-112. - Subdivision application. (a) Class I subdivisions. Complete class I preliminary subdivision applications shall include the following: (1) Completion of all items on the preliminary subdivision application form; (2) A location map; (3) A half -section map; (4) A certificate of survey of the property (5) Class I subdivisions that were required to have a sketch plan review may use all required maps submitted with application, provided no changes have been made by the subdivider; and if changes have been required, new maps shall be prepared and resubmitted with preliminary subdivision application; (6) A property owner's list per public hearing requirements in Section 78-48and stamped an-, addressed envelopes for- notifieation of neighbors within 350 feet of the subjeet tr-aet; (7) Any additional information requested by the zoning administrator or planning commission; (8) Payment of the preliminary subdivision review fee; and (9) Written and dated certification by the zoning administrator confirming that the preliminary subdivision application has been completed in compliance with chapter 78 and this chapter. Certification does not mean all information is correct, just that apparently all issues identified in the subdivision have been addressed by the subdivider. (b) Class II subdivisions. Complete class II preliminary plat applications shall include the following: (1) Completion of all items on the preliminary plat application form; (2) All maps and other information submitted for the sketch plan review shall be considered submitted for the preliminary plat review; and if changes have been made by the subdivider, new maps shall be prepared and resubmitted; (3) A property owner's list per public hearing requirements of Section 78-48and stamped and addressed etwelopes for- netifieation of neighbors within 350 feet of the sttbjeet tr-aet; (4) Provision of copies of the preliminary plat in a form required by the CitX; 8 (5) In areas served by public sewer and/or water, a plan showing the existing service ties and the proposed connection sizes and locations ' by 14 inehes) (6) In areas not served by public sewer, an on-site sewage treatment site evaluation report for each lot, and a copy of the current compliance inspection report for each existing on-site system; (7) Any additional information requested by the zoning administrator or planning commission; (8) Payment of the preliminary plat review fee; and (9) Written and dated certification by the zoning administrator confirming that the subdivision has been completed in compliance with chapter 78 and this chapter. Certification does not mean all information is correct, just that apparently all issues identified have been addressed by the subdivider. (c) Class III subdivisions. Complete class III preliminary plat application shall include the following: (1) Completion of all items on the preliminary plat application form; (2) All maps and other information submitted for the sketch plan review shall be considered submitted for the preliminary plat review; and if changes have been made by the subdivider, new maps shall be prepared and resubmitted; (3) A property owner's list per public hearing requirements of Section 78-48and stamped and addressed efwelepes for- notifieation of neighbors within 350 feet of the stibjeet tr-aet; (4) Provision of 25 eepies-o the preliminary plat; (5) Provision of 25 eepies oi the utilities map; (6) A soil survey and report by the Hennepin Soils and Water Conservation District (to be requested by the city if the zoning administrator feels such information is necessary for the subdivision review); (7) A soil erosion and sedimentation control plan; (8) A vegetation preservation and protection plan; (9) Any additional information requested by the zoning administrator or planning commission such as: a. Proposed protective covenants; b. Statement of the proposed use of lots stating type of residential buildings with number of proposed dwelling units and type of business or industry, so as to reveal the effect of the development on traffic, fire hazards and congestions of population; or Where the subdivider is the owner or intends to attempt to acquire the property adjacent to that property which is being proposed for the subdivision, the planning commission may require that the subdivider submit a sketch plan of the remainder of the property so as to show the possible relationships between the proposed subdivision and any future subdivision; in any event, all subdivisions shall be shown to relate well with existing or potential adjacent subdivisions; (10) Payment of the preliminary plat review fee; and (11) Written and dated certification by the zoning administrator confirming that the subdivision has been completed in compliance with chapter 78 and this chapter. Certification does not mean all information submitted is correct, just that apparently all issues identified in the subdivision have been addressed by the subdivider. (d) Application deadlines. The subdivider shall file a complete preliminary subdivision application with the zoning administrator a4 least 30 days prior- to the rvgalaf4y sehedul at the deadline established by the city annually. SECTION 19. Section 82-113(c) shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 82-113. - Staff and agency review of the preliminary subdivision. (c) Public hearing meeting notice. Notice of the hearing shall be consistent with Section 78- 48. -consist of the time and plaee, the addfess of the propet4y and a brief deser-iption of the proposal, ineluding subdivider's name, the number- of lots proposed, and their- proposed use, a shall be published in the offieial newspaper- at least ten days pfier- to the meeting. Wr-44e notifieation of the meeting shali be mailed at least ten days prior- to all owner -s of land set fe on the pfopeAy e�A%er-'s list within 350 feet of the botmdar-y of the pr-epeAy in "estion. SECTION 20. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2017 on a vote of ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2017. 10 Council LA18-000042 Exhibit B SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE REGARDING THE DISTANCE FOR NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on June 11, 2018, Ordinance No. , Third Series, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. Third Series, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the Council amends Chapter 78 and 82 of the Orono City Code regarding the distance for notification for public hearings. This ordinance amends the Orono Code by removing duplicate statements regarding public hearing notices and adds a section which describes a public hearing which is referenced throughout the ordinance. The ordinance amends the distance for mailing notifications from 350 feet to 500 feet. The complete ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this 11 day of June, 2018. CITY OF ORONO Dennis Walsh, Mayor Anna Carlson, City Clerk Summary Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. Hennepin HennepI Dou 1ty LoI._-,.1te & Notify Map Date: 0 r' ZUy[ �41� �7 2100 O O 210L (17) CIO (44) 2" 2118 "')2130 (20) 2138 3660 (12) O 3640 (48 (48) 2142 3600 2166 To(o R (n1 2172 (10) (9) 2184 2178 0) � 3601 m (21) 2190 22 (34) (33) (6) 2208 (36) `ti,; . lb 2216 Xti (4) 2171 -- 2224 z) 3635 2232 (14) (136) 2177 224 2195(1W 2199 22 2205 (13 (134) (17) 36 0 � � ��y� X22 2229 (138) 2213 (144) 2237 3590 (12D) (126) 2245 22 Buffer Buie: 350 feet Map Comments: 33 p��ri�cs 0 60 120 240 ft I t i I I I i t I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 2255 (23) 3593 3640 3477 6603650 3630 2265 3599 ) 3585 3533 3505 3493 3485 34 0) (29) (28) (27) (24) `+ (21)) (27) (26) ( 12) (11) (10) 111 ,l. (140) 2285 (25) 3600 00 3596 3580 3572 3554 3556 3520 3508 3488 3472 (25) (34) (35) (150) (148) (40) (41) (42)(138) (16) 3692 lQ�, 3697 3695 3690 (34) 230s(�) 3599 3585 3577 3559 3551 3541 3533 3525 3505 3495 347B 3Fs Buffer Buie: 350 feet Map Comments: 33 p��ri�cs 0 60 120 240 ft I t i I I I i t I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us Hennep County Locate & Noffy Map Date: 5/17/2018 Buffer Siwe 500 feet Map Comments: 0 120 240 480 ft I t I I I t II I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 1 gis.info@hennepin.us s� 4 0 a tri Toys) Rd Crystat %_Tvingstoji Avv P m v N. ynr nu It d Lytic Ave. 2 Buffer Siwe 500 feet Map Comments: 0 120 240 480 ft I t I I I t II I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 1 gis.info@hennepin.us T%a&=0 f&� M&P , 3-45o Wte,,7% Hennepin H e nne p- County Lc a (..3 e t`�S'( N o ffy Map Date: 5/17/20 2300 n2, 500 2260 540 2300 2280 2180 (141 (5) (27) 2320 (2t) I o 'A 5 1 2285 (3) 2180 � 2110 2325 2160 7(2) (a) 2120 (+o) (4) e 2275 2265 (5) 2185 ' 2175 2095 (3) (2) 2135 Buffer Mzee 350 feet Map Comments: 0 60 120 240 ft I i( t I( i t I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us ZZ&AC Tbl� 5���Op &�A% H. Hennep�n County Locate Noffy Map 9:D-5 0 Date: 5/17/2018 Y a4 y`,1 Buffer fuzee 500 feet Map Comments: 2� ,Pwp�rt�tss 0 120 240 480 ft I i i I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 1 gis.info@hennepin.us 1�0 M A �P -- �§W I Henneph County Locate & Noffy Map Date: 5/17/2018 y 1 `Ra 2900 291 < (32) 2895 (72) 2905 2910 ) 2' (33) 2917 (55) (34) 915 2925 2940 05) 2927 (49)=933 2948 (36) (46) (as) 2965 2941 (4n (03) 2970 (m 2967(64) 2980 (81) 297 (4) 2990(M �r 0.. (2n h , �r 2987 (' (23) 3005 (24) 3015 p) 3025 03 3045 0250 tt 3045 (12) 3035 3065 3055 (16) (ti> 3085 (to) 306107) (s) (6) 3125 Buffer Foxe: 350 feet Map Comments: (2) (1) (el (2n (76) 355U nn 3548 3546 (78) 3545 A 353 34) 35 (35) <Pl t 3030 3034 (52) 3 "sD it (51) (42) l43 3038 (55) 3287 (44) 3040 3297 310 (M) 05 0 (45) 3287 3040 3297 (48) 3309 ;305 (49) 31 GG Casco PoIntt 3127 r `"r k 0 60 120 240 ft I I I, I I( I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us L 20 CAwSc(-E�-�> Hennepon County Locate Notffy Map Date: 5/17/2018 Buffer f uze. 500 feet Map Comments: 7 zS 0 60 120 240 ft I( t i I( i i I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 71'01:. 2900 2) 2 (32) 2895 (72) 2905 2910 2920 (33) 11) (28) 2917 (6) (55) 2930 (3a) 3560 2925 (27) (16)915 940 3550 (35) (17) 3548 (5) 2948 3546 (1� (49) - 793"s (48) (65) 2965 3545 353 (34) 29 (471 (63) 2970 feo) 2967(64) 4 2980 (81) 3535 2975 (45) > 2990(3) (a5) 3525 y 3026 3030 3034 2987 (M) (54 35 9 i (M) l5t) 3005 (24) (� 3277 l43) 3015 3038 (55) 3277 (3) 3287 A 3025 03 3045 3040 3297 310( 025(2) (35) 0 (45) ^2g 3045 (12) 3040 (1) 3 , 3035 Hyj 3065 3055(181 111) 3309 33 (49) 3085 (1o) 6107) 5 3100 (6) 3105 3125 3127 } }'041211 Buffer f uze. 500 feet Map Comments: 7 zS 0 60 120 240 ft I( t i I( i i I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator Laura Oakden, City Planner May 21, 2018 Council LA18-000042 Exhibit D #LA18-000042, City of Orono Text Amendment: Notification Distance for Public Hearings, Public Hearing Application Summary: The city is considering an ordinance that would alter the notification distance for public hearings from 350 feet to 500 feet. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should consider the propose changes to the public hearing notification distance. Background The Mayor requested a change to the notice requirements for public hearing, currently 350 feet from the subject property. The Mayor proposes 500 feet. State Statute requires notification of property owners within 350 feet for zoning ordinance amendments. Within the zoning and subdivision chapters, the City also requires a public hearing for all conditional use permits, variances, rezoning requests, comprehensive plan amendments, wetland and subdivision requests. The intent of the notification radii is to inform those property owners that are more likely to be directly impacted by a proposal. All interested parties are notified via the notice in the official paper, and on the city's listserve. Changing the distance from 350 feet to 500 feet would allow for more neighbors to be notified which would increase the chance for more public input. The Planning Commission should consider and evaluate the typical amount of public input they receive for public hearing applications and how the residents hear about the projects. Other items to consider include: • The increased cost for postage and mailings (currently part of the recently reduce application fee) • The impact an application might have on an abutting neighbor verses of neighbor 500 feet away. Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Clean Copy Exhibit B. Examples of past 350ft notification areas compared to 500ft. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council LA18-000042 Exhibit E 6. LA18-000042 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT — PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS, 7:34 P.M. — 7:45 P.M. Oakden stated Staff was requested to look at changing the notice requirements for a public hearing. Currently notices are sent to property owners 350 feet from the subject property. The Mayor proposes 500 feet. State Statute requires notification of property owners within 350 feet for zoning ordinance amendments. Within the zoning and subdivision chapters, the City also requires a public hearing for all conditional use permits, variances, rezoning requests, comprehensive plan amendments, wetland and subdivision requests. The intent of the notification radii is to inform those property owners that are more likely to be directly impacted by a proposal. All interested parties can learn about the project through the City's official paper or through the City's listserve. Having a larger notification area would increase the change for more public input. The Planning Commission should consider and evaluate the typical amount of public input they receive for public hearing applications and how the residents hear about the projects. Other items to consider include the increased cost for postage and mailings and the impact an application might have on an abutting neighbor versus a neighbor located 500 feet away. Oakden noted she did include some examples in the packet depicting the current notification area and the expanded notification area. Landgraver asked how this change would impact Staff. Landgraver asked how likely it would be that Staff will be receiving more calls. Oakden stated it is likely Staff will get more calls and that the Planning Commission will receive additional input but that she is not sure of a specific percentage. 6. LA18-000042 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT — PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS, 7:34 P.M. — 7:45 P.M. — Continued Seals asked if there is any expectation for increased processing time. Oakden stated the notice mailing is provided by the applicant at this time and that there will be some Staff time to print the additional postcards as well as the postage. Libby stated considering lot sizes, in his view the 500 feet would be more inclusive. Thiesse commented he has some difficulty with expanding the notification area and that the City tries hard to get people involved but that it does not always work. Thiesse stated in his view people in the neighborhood have an obligation to know what is going on in their neighborhood. Thiesse stated he likes getting people involved but that he does not like going beyond what the state statute requires. Thiesse noted the City just backed off of their wetland ordinances for that very reason. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Ressler stated as a variance applicant from two years ago, he had no idea who some of the people were that were on the list. Ressler stated 350 feet goes a long way when the property is on the lake or in a smaller lot neighborhood. Ressler noted the applicants are also required to post signs that say they are applying for a permit. Ressler stated unless there is an epidemic of people saying they have not been informed, he does not see the need to increase the area. Landgraver noted there have been instances where people did get the notice but still said they were not informed about it. Landgraver stated there will always be instances of people asking why someone did not tell them about it and that he is in agreement with Chair Thiesse that the City should follow the state guidelines. Landgraver questioned what the return on the investment will be, noting that more people offering opinions on something, especially when it comes to a small project, might not always be the best. Lemke stated increasing it to 500 feet is not going to guarantee people will pay attention to the notice. Landgraver stated the most pushback he remembers for not receiving notice was the Dayton property off of County Road 6. Landgraver asked whether Staff have the discretion to expand it. Curtis stated Staff does not expand it because they do not want to make a decision on one project versus another. Curtis stated on larger projects they will erect a City sign. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Lemke moved, Ressler seconded, to recommend denial of Application No. LA18-000042, City of Orono Text Amendment: Notification Distance for Public Hearings. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 18 Date: June 11, 2018 Item Description: LA18-44, City of Orono, 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department's Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The item requests authorization from the City Council to submit the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan update to the Metropolitan Council. Formal approval will be requested in November/ December, following the public comment period that ends at the end of October. 2. Background/ Summary. The update to the Comprehensive plan, via the guidance of a citizen advisory committee started in the spring of 2017. The plan retains the general development and land protection philosophies established by earlier plans, including preservation of rural character, preservation of the natural environment and of water quality was very important to the committee. A more complete summary can be found in the PC staff report, attached as Exhibit B. Following the public comment period, the Advisory Committee will meet and suggest responses to the comments received. These responses, and the final plan, will then be presented for a public hearing and formal vote by the Planning Commission and City Council. 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to authorize the submittal of the plan to the Met Council. Commission comments during the meeting centered on getting more citizen input on the plan. 4. Public Comment. No comments were received. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends authorization to submit the plan to the Met Council for preliminary comments. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the submittal of the preliminary draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Exhibits Exhibit A. Full Plan Draft Exhibit B. Planning Commission Minutes, draft Exhibit C. Planning Commission Staff report Exhibit D. Existing Land Use Map Exhibit E. 2030 Planned Land Use Map Exhibit F. 2040 Planned Land Use References PC Exhibits A. 2030 Planned Development Sites B. 2040 Planned Development Sites Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: JS)�6Z Approved By: -Tga F st. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DRAFT TO THE METROPOLITAIN COUNCIL FOR PRELIMINARY COMMENT FILE NO. LA18-000044 WHEREAS, in March 2017, the City of Orono commenced development and review of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update by establishing a Planning Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, this Committee consisted of members of the public, and the following standing advisory commissions and boards: Planning Commission, Park Commission, and City Council; and WHEREAS, the draft plan, developed by Committee was distributed to 26 affected agencies on the Committee on April 27th, 2018 to start the 6 month review period; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2018, the Committee hosted a public open house to review the plan; and WHEREAS, on May 21St, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to preliminarily review the plan; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2018, the City Council reviewed the comments of the Planning Commission, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby directs the submittal of this draft plan for review by the Metropolitan Council: CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: 1. The Council desires to ensure that all affected persons and agencies have an opportunity to comment. 2. The Council notes that comments received during the public review process may influence the final plan and that the plan submitted is not the final plan. F st. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO: Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono 2020-2040 Community Management DRAFT April 27, 2018 CMP Part 1. Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION Contents PURPOSE.........................................................................................................................2 TITLE...............................................................................................................................2 SCOPE..............................................................................................................................2 OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................3 Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral..........................................................................4 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION........................................5 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 1 CMP Part 1. Introduction CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to document and reinforce the established goals, policies and principles of the City of Orono as a guide for orderly and economic private development and public improvement in the years ahead. Major emphasis is on the needs and involvement of people. The Plan discusses how people can manage their environment, how people have become involved with municipal decisions, how people can create and continue the lifestyle and community that we know as Orono. This Plan is a revised, expanded and updated version of Orono's 2010-2030 Community Management Plan (CMP). It reflects the City's long-established philosophy, goals and policies that were first introduced in the 1974 Orono Comprehensive Guide Plan and later solidified within the 1980 Orono CMP. Major policy direction remains relatively unchanged but the content has been revised and updated to reflect the changes the City and the Metropolitan Area has undergone since 2010. TITLE The title of this document is the Community Management Plan. Throughout this document, the Community Management Plan will be abbreviated as "CMP". SCOPE The scope of this Plan is intended to include almost every factor that influences investments or improvements in the City, whether by private individuals or government involvement. Each section of the Plan stands on its own merits yet is an integral part of the whole. For instance, Orono's history and natural features are explored as factors explaining and constraining contemporary decisions. The Land Use Management section becomes the primary tool for formulation of zoning regulations and development proposals. Planning of transportation, recreation and sewer services allows for coordination of capital investment with land management and regional system capacity. Relevance of the Plan is important as concepts must be current to be fully understood or implemented. Regular and ongoing reviews are to be conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council to renew this understanding in light of changing attitudes and events. Careful reading will reveal that Orono's past history and current goals have remained essentially the same. Therefore, the reader is advised that for all intents and purposes, this Plan and its impact on local development are intended to be permanent. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 2 CMP Part 1. Introduction OVERVIEW The basic concerns and philosophies of Orono citizens have evolved through the City's history and its intimate ties with Lake Minnetonka. Map No. 1-1 locates Orono in relationship to Minneapolis and the western suburbs. More importantly, it clearly indicates the relative importance of Orono to the total watershed of Lake Minnetonka. No other city bordering the Lake has as much water area, as much shoreline, or as much watershed land area as Orono. Orono is committed to effective land use planning and permanent environmental protection in an effort to preserve the great resources of Lake Minnetonka for the benefit of all regional residents. The people of Orono, though of diverse interests, have been drawn together by a slow-paced lifestyle and quiet amenities. Their common tie is a commitment to maintain those attractions of which Lake Minnetonka is the most visible example. In the 1950's, increasing urbanization all around Lake Minnetonka threatened to environmentally "kill" the Lake by uncontrolled discharge of nutrients. Citizens became concerned. Their first reaction caused lake area municipalities to begin extending sewer systems to eliminate individual septic system discharges. This helped the situation at first, but by 1968 lake water quality was still diminishing. Citizens became alarmed. At this point the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency joined with the newly organized Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to commission a study of lake pollution. Entitled "A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka", the "Harza Study" (as it will be referred to hereafter) found that this nutrient input, particularly phosphorus, was being generated from two principal sources: the seven municipal sewage treatment plants; and urban stormwater runoff coming from within the watershed. The first pollution source, nutrient rich effluent outflowing from the municipal sewage treatment plants, was systematically eliminated during the late 1970's and early 1980's by multi-million dollar construction of sewer interceptors designed to remove effluent from the watershed. But stormwater runoff is a different matter. Compared to point -source sewage pollution, the collection and treatment of non- point source stormwater runoff is relatively difficult, costly, and often impractical. Lake Minnetonka is fed by neither spring nor tributary. The sole replenishment comes from storm water runoff from the watershed, of which over one-third flows from or through Orono. Lake Minnetonka, second only to Lake Michigan in this region, has an extremely long 25 -year flush -out period. This means that careful and continuous attention must be given to the quality of runoff into the Lake. The various studies conducted in the 1960's and 1970's recommended that lakeshore density be limited and that the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from storm water runoff. Implementation of density limitations relies on breaking the "Urbanization Spiral", the development paradox that results from providing urban -level municipal services for new development. The paradox is that if municipal services are extended into rural zones, the cost of these services taxes the land to the point that higher density development is required. Particularly in the case of sewers, even if extended to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 3 CMP Part 1. Introduction existing pockets of development "to solve a pollution problem", inflation, topography and sparse settlement combine to increase costs. Such costs can be paid only by increasing development densities, which in turn cause increasing levels of storm water nutrient pollution. This spiral results in even greater levels of pollution than the original sewage 'problem' might have been. For example, Eugene Hickock's 1973 Storm Water Impact Statement for the Metropolitan Council identified up to 10 times more phosphorus alone from urban storm water runoff than from Orono's low-density rural land use. In response to the above concerns, Orono became a nationally recognized leader in espousing environmental protection. Land use planning since the 1950's has stressed the environmental advantages of low density development. Shorelands, wetlands and natural drainage systems have been preserved by tradition and by ordinance. Comprehensive planning was underway by the mid-1960s. In 1974, the first published Plan, as approved by the Metropolitan Council, established as its foremost guiding principle the protection and preservation of Lake Minnetonka and its associated wetlands. The 1980 Community Management Plan and its subsequent 2000-2020 update reinforced these principles and have served as the basis for management of development in Orono for the past three decades. LAKE POLLUTION NDN -PANT SOURCE INCREASED FIARD COVER MME RUN-DrF mORE POLuumkNTS F`Rom [LLAKE POLLUTI6N LP WNFERTILIZATaNLILTVEN CLE EXNhIIST IDE-1DEING. ANO StFtET LTI-I HAZARD SWEEPING ALTERNATIVES STUDIED OR4€R€W SEWER EXTENSION LAND S BDIVSSIONI To SMEAO VNIT COSTS OF AS FES S- NENTS I PROPEWrY ASSESSMENTS IiJI PVSE FINANUAL suRoeN I DUE TO SPECIAL Cf STRUC- TION IN WETLAND TERRAIN, LARGE L13T ACREAGE M SCATTERED DEVELOPMENTO Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral Illustrates the development paradox that faces Orono if municipal services are extended into rural areas. Orono has consistently made the decision to limit the extension of urban services into rural areas. The combination of low density residential development, establishment of privately owned and maintained roads, and use of septic systems and wells has provided Orono with unique and sustainable neighborhoods that are not only self-sufficient but collectively have a low environmental impact. Enforcement of the policies necessary to create and maintain these rural neighborhoods has been consistent and effective. Today, Orono still faces the same issues as other outlying communities, although Orono is no longer the 'outer ring' that it was 20-30 years ago. Development pressures continue as speculators view our remaining open spaces seeking to put them to a "highest and best use". The Metropolitan Council has recognized an City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 4 CMP Part 1. Introduction urgency to curtail "Urban Sprawl" by making more efficient use of the remaining undeveloped land within the 7 -county Metro area. Yet Orono has an obligation to its residents, both those who live on the Lake and those who reside in the rural area, to preserve these two complementary lifestyles. Orono accepts its obligation to the citizens of Minnesota who treasure Lake Minnetonka as a unique and valuable natural resource and who expect it to remain in a usable condition. Orono's ongoing plan to preserve the watershed of Lake Minnetonka is sound, environmentally correct, and in step with regional planning for metropolitan needs. COMMUNITY MANA GEMENT PLAN OR GANIZA TION This document has been divided into six parts in order to make it more readable and understandable to citizens and other interested parties: Part 1 forms a brief introduction and overview of planning concerns. Part 2 provides a foundation for Orono's plan - the history, community philosophy and general goals and policies that have shaped and will continue to guide Orono's planning strategy. Part 3 encompasses Orono's Land Use Plan, defining how Orono will develop in the coining two decades, and defining Orono's housing and environmental protection programs. Part 4 contains detailed plans for how Orono will provide a balanced and appropriate level of public facilities and services, addressing transportation systems, sewer and water facilities, parks and open spaces, and the broad range of community services such as public safety, education, private utility and communications systems. Part 5 contains a brief description of ordinances and programs for implementation of the Plan, and expresses the City's commitment to coordination of services and programs with surrounding municipalities as well as other governmental agencies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 5 2040 Comprehensive Plan Regional Location Map^^ BOLTON ti M & MENK ,may Orono, MN February 2018 s' Real People. Real Solutions. 41 Wright Co Sherburne Co Sibley Co Le Sueur Co Legend e de St. Paul & Minneapolis Metro Counties Other Counties 0 10 Miles Source: MnGeo nepin Co wMWV Scott Co Isanti Co Ramsey Co St. Paul Minneapolis Rice Co Chisago Co Washington Co Z71 Goodhue Co CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION Community Historical Background............................................................................. 2-1 Table 2-1: Important Dates in Orono's History Community Demographic Profile 2-5 Chart2-1: Population............................................................................................................ 2-5 Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment.......................................2-6 Table 2-3: Population Changes in Surrounding Communities ................................. 2-6 Table2-4: Household Trends........................................................................................2-7 Table 2-5: Population by Age.......................................................................................2-7 Table 2-6: Households by Current Age of Householder.............................................2-8 Table 2-7: Household Income Ranges.......................................................................2-8 CommunityPhilosophy..............................................................................................2-9 Community Goals and Policies.................................................................................2-12 Comprehensive Planning Strategy............................................................................2-19 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 1 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Every community has a unique character arising from its location, natural resources, history and population. Orono is no exception to this rule. But Orono's plan for the future may be exceptional, because its basic premise is the maintenance and furtherance of our very own unique features. Orono's corporate history dates to 1858 when Minnesota became a state, and western Hennepin County was surveyed and divided into townships. All of Orono south of Watertown Road was located in Excelsior Township, with the area north of Watertown Road being located in Medina Township. But the citizens of Orono, few as they were, found the going difficult in having to negotiate the lake in order to transact business in far away Excelsior. So, in 1868, the townships were realigned with everything north of the Narrows becoming part of Medina. The separate Township of Orono was created out of the southern half of Medina on April 9, 1889. The name Orono was brought to the area by Major George Brackett, a native of Orono, Maine, who first used it to designate the area now known as Brackett's Point. Orono Township once included areas now part of neighboring cities. Minnetonka Beach was incorporated out of Medina Township in 1884. Long Lake was incorporated from Orono Township in 1906. Long Lake expanded, Wayzata grew westward, and then Spring Park was incorporated in 1952. Finally, effective January 1, 1955, Orono Village was incorporated encompassing all the remaining parts of the township including the settlements of Navarre, Crystal Bay, Orono and Bederwood (Stubbs Bay). A number of minor boundary changes have occurred since then, including detachment of the tip of Three Points Peninsula to Mound in 1963; annexation of small strip from Minnetrista in 1980 for McCulley Road; detachment of the Fleming Trail Addition to Long Lake in 1993; and annexation of property along North Ferndale and West Ferndale Roads from Wayzata in 1994 in exchange for detachment of a property along Highway 12 to accommodate Wayzata's public works facilities. The history of Orono's development is one of conversions: conversion of the Lake Minnetonka shoreline from Big Woods to summer homes in the late 1800's and early 1900's, a second conversion from lakeshore summer homes to year round residences since WWII; and conversion of the off -lake woods and prairie openings into farmland in the 19th century, with a more recent conversion from farms to low-density residential homesites beginning in the 1950's. Orono's first Township zoning regulations were adopted in 1950, and grew progressively more strict through the next two decades. Several residential and commercial zones were initially established, requiring minimum lot area and width standards, and defining allowable uses. The first wetland protection ordinance was established in 1963, about the same time that municipal sewers were first provided to the Navarre area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 3 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Perhaps the single most important event that has shaped Orono's development in the last half -century was the City-wide rezoning in 1975. Much of the City had been zoned for residential development with 1 -acre lots by 1967, with most of the Navarre area around Lake Minnetonka being zoned 1/2 -acre, and a few areas in northeast Orono requiring 1-1/2 or 2 -acre lot sizes. The 1975 rezoning took into account two important factors. First, that creating and maintaining a low density of development in the watershed is critical to preserving Lake Minnetonka; and second, that lots must be large enough to accommodate on- site sewage treatment systems on a permanent basis, due to the high cost of sewering and the "urbanization spiral". As a result, the 1975 rezoning established a minimum lot size of 2 acres (or 5 acres in northwest Orono) for 80% of Orono's land area. This had a dramatic effect not only in slowing development, but in effect capping the City's ultimate potential population at around 10,000 rather than the 30-40,000 that had been predicted under typical suburban development scenarios. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 4 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-1: IMPORTANT DATES IN ORONO HISTORY 1803 The Louisiana Purchase: U.S. acquires 828,000 square miles of land from France for about 3C an acre 1822 W. J. Snelling and Joe Brown explore the upper reaches of Minnehaha Creek and sight Lake Minnetonka 1851 Treaty of Traverse des Sioux opens lands west of Mississippi for settlement; ratified by U.S. Senate in 1852 1852 Hennepin County organized; first township surveys conducted 1853 First settlers arrive in what is now Orono: Rev. Stephen Hull at 'The Narrows'; Stephen Bean of Maine at north shore of Stubbs Bay; John Carman at Spring Park; James and Francis Maxwell on Maxwell Bay. 1855 Arrival of many settlers in the Orono and Long Lake area: David Lydiard, Eleazer Dickey and Miles Bayer, all of Nova Scotia; the Edwin Turnham and George Maxwell families settle in Medina; the French, Fox and Fogelman families bring first horses to region; John Carman filed first subdivision in Orono, "Town of Tazaska" for land lying between North Arm, Forest Lake, West Arm and Crystal Bay, on May 3, 1855 1856 First sawmill in Orono on the Watertown Road, erected by Long Lake founder George Knettle; 'Tamarack' Post Office begun at home of Henry Stubbs; first stageline extended through Orono to Irvin Shrewsbury's corner in Independence 1858 Minnesota becomes 32nd state 1860 The Governor Ramsey, built by Charles Galpin, becomes first steamboat on Lake Minnetonka; many area roads surveyed by B.F. Christlieb, including "Harrington Road" (now Ferndale Road); final year that Chief Shakopee and his band of Sisseton Dakota winter at Teepee Hill (Union Cemetery ). 1861 Union Cemetery Association formed 1863 First church in area, Presbyterian Church of Medina, formed in the Old North (Lydiard) School, near Wolsfeld Lake. 1868 Railroad reaches Long Lake; land on north shore of Lake Minnetonka annexed from Excelsior township to Medina township 1870 Joel Stubbs patents sorghum processing unit, replacing wheat as major crop for a decade 1873 First dredging and widening of 'Hull's Narrows' opens upper lake for navigation 1880 George A. Brackett purchases 'Starvation Point' from Nathan Stubbs, renames it'Orono Point' after boyhood home in Maine; Saga Hill colony begun on north shore of North Arm 1882 James J. Hill's spur line to Minnetonka Beach opens in conjunction with grand opening of Hotel Lafayette in June, 1882, helping to make Lake Minnetonka an internationally known resort destination; development grew up around the railroad stops such as Crystal Bay and Navarre 1884 Areas of Minnetonka Beach, Navarre and Spring Park added to Medina Township 1889 Town of Orono formed from parts of Medina and Excelsior Townships 1894 Village of Minnetonka Beach formed 1898 Formation of Minnetonka Fruit Growers Association 1906 Village of Long Lake incorporated, first telephone lines begun City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 5 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 1906 New Orono town hall constructed in Crystal Bay 1913 New library begun at Long Lake Bank 1917 St. George Catholic Church founded 1923 Leo Feser begins building Orono Golf Course 1932 Trinity Lutheran Church formed 1930's Drought hits midwest, Lake Minnetonka level drops 6 feet 1950 First Orono Township Zoning Ordinances adopted 1951 Village of Spring Park incorporated 1955 Orono becomes an incorporated village 1963 Orono sewer plant constructed near French Lake, Navarre area provided with municipal sewers 1965 May 6 - Tornado devastates parts of Orono, Navarre hard hit 1970 Navarre municipal water system constructed 1974 Orono becomes a city; new zoning ordinances enacted to maintain low density development ca. 1973 U.S. Highway 12 freeway section extended to Orono's eastern border 1980 Orono sewer plant decommissioned, replaced by Metro interceptor transporting Orono's wastewater to Blue Lake Treatment Plant in Shakopee 1981 McCulley Road Ring Route opens to traffic providing an alternative to County Road 15 for east -west traffic 1989 Orono commemorates its Centennial Year 1992 Orono municipal offices, police, and public works relocated to new complex on Old Crystal Bay Road North across from Orono Schools 2000 Question of proposed consolidation with City of Long Lake receives positive response from Orono voters but fails in Long Lake 2000 William and Susan Lurton donate 39 acres for Passive, natural environmental park. 2001 City Council approves Orono Woods Senior Housing, creates first Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 2006 Orono acquires Big Island Veterans Camp 2006 Navarre Fire Station 2 added 2008 Completion of new Highway 12 "Super 2" segment from Orono's eastern border to County Road 6 2015 Lakeview Golf Course redeveloped as residential development 2015 City expands Hackberry Park as part of a living trust with the Gleason Family 2016 Dayton property, one of the last Big Woods parcels, develops as estate residential. Sources: Excerpts from "Orono, Minnesota 1889-1989: 100 Years By the Waters of Minnetonka" edited by James R. Roehl, Excerpts from "Picturesque Minnetonka " published by Excelsior -Lake Minnetonka Historical Society, 1976, City files. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 6 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation COMMUNITYDEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE The population of Orono was estimated by the Met Council in 2016 as 7,691. This represents an increase of 254 people since 2010. Total number of households was estimated to be 3,037 in 2016, and increase from the 2,826 households reported in 2010. The persons per household has decreased steadily since 1970, then a high of 3.43 persons per household to 2.529 estimated now. The following chart illustrates Orono's relatively rapid growth during the period 1920-1950 (averaging around 60% per decade); a decline in the rate of growth from 1950 to 1970 (slowing to 20% per decade); and relatively slow growth since 1970 (less than 5% per decade). This slow rate of growth is expected to continue for the next 20 years based on the City's current zoning and planned land use and the amount of undeveloped property. Orono is primarily a bedroom community, with 70% of its land area guided for residential use. Annual population increases over the last 30 years have averaged less than 1% per year. Chart 2-1 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Population 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 est. est. est. Sources: U.S. Census 1920-2000; Met Council Systems Statement Forecasts 2010-2040 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 7 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment 1970 - 2040 Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 8,100 8,800 9,500 Households 1,976 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons per Household 3.43 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1,370 1,555 1,635 1,700 Source: U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council; City Estimates of Employment Surrounding communities have undergone varied rates of population increase in recent decades, as shown in Table 2-3. Among cities that have a smaller geographic area that has been developed for many years (Long Lake, Mound, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata) the population increase over the period 1970- 2010 has been relatively small, ranging from 0%-20%, with Spring Park being the anomaly in that it grew by nearly 54%, due to the construction of many multi -family housing units. Among those cities that have a larger geographic area approaching township size, the population increase for Independence, Minnetrista, & Medina was approximately 77 to 122%, with Plymouth and Orono at opposite ends of a much wider range. While Plymouth more than quadrupled its population over 30 years, Orono's increased by only 10%. Table 2-3: Population Change in Surrounding Communities 1960-2000 COMMUNITY 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Percentage Increase 2000- 2010 Percentage Increase 1970- 2010 Independence 1,446 1 1,993 2,640 2,822 3,236 3,524 9% 77% Long Lake 996 1,506 1,747 1,984 1,842 1,780 -3% 18% Medina 1,472 2,396 2,623 3,096 4,005 4,903 22% 105% Minnetonka Beach 544 586 575 573 614 522 -15% -11% Minnetrista 2,211 1 2,878 3,236 3,439 4,358 6,384 46% 122% Mound 5,440 7,572 9,280 9,634 9,435 9,045 4% 19% Orono 5,643 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 -1% 10% Plymouth 9,576 18,077 31,615 50,889 65,894 70,720 7% 291% Spring Park 668 1,087 1,465 1,571 1,717 1,674 -3% 54% Tonka Bay 1,204 1,397 1,354 1,472 1,547 1,486 -4% 6% Wayzata 3,219 3,700 3,621 3,806 4,113 3,692 -10% 0% City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 8 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-4 illustrates that household sizes have been decreasing, while the annual growth in the number of households has remained relatively low compared to suburbs which are growing rapidly. Household size is expected to continue to decline to a level of approximately 2.40 persons per household by 2020. The number of households has increased significantly during the period 2000-2010, reflecting Orono's commitment to providing a wider range of housing options. Table 2-4: Household Trends Year Households Percent Change in Households Household growth Household Size (persons per household) 1970 1976 ---- 3.43 1980 2291 15.94% 315 2.99 1990 2613 14.05% 322 2.79 2000 2763 5.74% 150 2.73 2010 2862 3.58% 99 2.63 2020 (Est.) 3200 11.81% 338 2.53 2030 (Est) 3560 11.25% 360 2.47 2040 (Est.) 1 3900 9.55% 1 340 2.44 Sources: 1970-2010 US Census Data; City records; Met Council forecasts City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 9 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Population by Ate Table 2-5 indicates the range in ages of Orono's population in 1990, 2000, and 2010. The Table also includes the Metropolitan Area's age breakdown in 2010. The average age in 1990 was 35 years with the median age being slightly higher at 36 years. As of the 2000 US Census, the median age had climbed substantially to 40.7 years, as compared to 34.2 years for the Twin Cities area. Table 2-5: Orono Population by Age, 1990, 2000 and 2010 Age Range 1990 Percentage 2000 Percentage 2010 Percentage Twin Cities MSA 0-4 484 6.60% 453 6.00% 344 4.63% 4.57% 5-9 549 7.50% 577 7.70% 580 7.80% 7.39% 10-14 542 7.40% 639 8.50% 664 8.93% 6.92% 15-19 487 6.70% 543 7.20% 532 7.15% 6.93% 20-24 302 4.10% 187 2.50% 181 2.43% 6.80% 25-34 978 13.40% 597 7.90% 400 5.38% 14.49% 35-44 1483 20.30% 1414 18.80% 914 12.29% 13.70% 45-54 1199 16.50% 1578 20.90% 1559 20.96% 14.66% 55-64 643 8.90% 874 11.60% 1323 17.79% 12.42% 65-74 408 5.60% 420 5.60% 587 7.89% 6.67% 75-84 162 2.20% 206 2.70% 269 3.62% 3.30% 85+ 48 0.70% 50 0.70% 84 1.13% 1.12% 7285 7538 7437 Sources: 1990 & 2000 U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council 1800 OVIIIII 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Population by Age 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ ■ 1990 2000 2010 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 10 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation In 2010, Orono's median household income was $111,000 compared to that of the seven county metro area ($65,200). Table 2-7: Median Household Income Orono 7 County Region 1990 Census $ 62,900.000 $ 36,600.00 2000 Census $ 88,300.000 $ 54,300.00 ACS 2006-2010 $ 111,000.000 $ 65,200.00 ACS 2012-2016 $ 119,400.000 $ 70,900.00 Source: US Census and American Community Survey COMMUNITY PHILOSOPHY Orono's Community Management Plan is a statement by the citizens as to what we are, where we have been, and where we are going. Orono will retain its own special identity through careful growth management in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and the community of citizens, both present and future. Orono's past growth and development patterns have been greatly influenced by the extensive and varied natural features found within our borders. Map 3B-5 indicates the pattern of land use as it exists today. It is apparent that development has been drawn by the lakes and clustered by the many bays and marshes. The most significant resource is Lake Minnetonka. The largest lake in the metropolitan Twin Cities area, Minnetonka has 22.4 square miles of surface area and approximately 130 miles of shoreline running along numerous bays, channels and inlets. Lake Minnetonka's watershed, including the Lake itself, encompasses 123 square miles, and approximately 115 of the contributing watershed lies in Orono. Orono has two distinct personalities: The historically developed lakeshore and the rural woods, fields and open spaces. Both areas are primarily residential in nature, relying upon the existing town center of Navarre and other nearby cities such as Long Lake, Spring Park, Wayzata, Mound and Maple Plain for shopping, employment, and entertainment activities. The concern of the residents is to provide for continuing maintenance and preservation of those natural resources and social amenities which attracted people to Orono in the first place. Near the lake, density of development has to be regulated in order to minimize the resultant stormwater runoff pollution which, if unrestricted, could permanently alter and destroy the ecology of this very unique resource. Away from the lake, the natural marshes and wetlands are to be protected as the primary and most practical method of storm water filtration and enhancement. Steep slopes will be protected from over -development and erosion. Woodlands will be preserved as wildlife habitat, erosion protection, noise barriers and places for personal solitude and contentment. Orono's primary goal of preserving the water quality and level of Lake Minnetonka can only be accomplished by maintaining the basic integrity of the natural watershed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 11 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Open space is to be cherished and protected. In urbanized areas, recreational needs go hand-in-hand with the necessities of light, air, and solar access. Views of the lakeshore are invaluable property rights and personal experiences. In rural areas, the open fields and pastures are witness to the rural lifestyles active in Orono, and each property owner has the ability to provide for his own varied recreational needs. Institutional and commercial needs have been met by the existing centers with no need for future expansion. The geographic relationships between the many lake area communities expand the services available to Orono residents beyond the City's borders. The many industrial, retail -commercial and health care facilities readily accessible locally and regionally are adequate to serve the needs of Orono residents. School populations are increasing slowly, and new technologies and program demands require some expansion of existing facilities but no new centers. Orono's population growth has been historically slow, allowing for gradual service increases and fiscal security. Public facilities have been provided and will continue to be improved at a level sufficient for protection of health and safety, but unobtrusively enough to allow continued self- independence and maintenance of rural lifestyles. The basic philosophies of the CMP are to the extent possible consistent with the policies and guidelines contained in the Metropolitan Council's 112040 Regional Development Framework". Future urban density in the urban area along the lake is to be in -fill development where existing urban services are available. Rural land use in the low-density residential lakeshore areas and in the area away from the lake, is to be free from expanded urban services except when necessary to protect the public health or to eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. In all neighborhoods, provisions are made for protection of environmental assets and for provision of open space and recreational amenities. Housing opportunities in and near Orono are available in a wide range of alternatives consistent with the availability of public services. Existing and planned sewer and transportation facilities are capable of servicing the planned density of development, and land use patterns are consistent with and complementary to those of neighboring cities. Orono's managed growth policy means that the need to use and enjoy Lake Minnetonka will be balanced with protection of its water quality and accessibility for future generations. This policy means that the acceptance of growth and development changes will be balanced with conservation of our resources and natural amenities, and maintenance of our small town social character. Orono intends to remain two communities in one. The historically developed area around and near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline has been called "Urban" because of historic developed density with lots typically one acre in area or smaller and the availability of a limited level of urban services. The area away from the Lake has been termed "Rural" because of the lack of density, the abundance of open space and the citizens' commitment to maintain this type of development. The majority of Orono's 'Rural Area' has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. When wetlands and roads are factored in, nearly 80% of the City's land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area ("MUSA") was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. As part of its Metro 2040 Regional Growth Strategy developed in 1996, Metropolitan Council for discussion purposes suggested that all but the northwestern tip of Orono will be in the MUSA by 2020. However, the City Council in the City's 2000-2020 CMP included a much smaller area within the MUSA (Map 4C-2) to be consistent with the extent of City -planned municipal sewer extensions, and to be consistent with the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 12 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation development plans of our neighboring municipalities. Map 313-2 depicts Orono's defined "Urban" areas (where zoning density will range from 1 unit per acre to as many as 20 units per acre) and its "Rural" areas (where ultimate developed density will range from 1 unit per 5 acres to 1 unit per 2 acres). Orono's 2010-2030 MUSA as approved by Met Council in 2008 reflect a clear intent to bring municipal sewer to lakeshore and shoreland areas where needed, as well as to existing concentrations of population where septic systems may not be suitable for the long-term. But most of all, Orono citizens have located the MUSA line and have defined the urban and rural areas to be consistent with their plans for permanent use and development of the City. COMMUNITY GOALS AND POLICIES The goals and policies of this plan have met the test of time in Orono. The basic premise of maintaining distinct urban and rural neighborhoods continues a hundred -year tradition. The commitment to environmental preservation remains uppermost in the list of priorities of Orono's residents. The inter - reliance of lake area communities for shopping and commercial needs, for housing variety and for provision of basic public services is both historic and economically practical. The following goals and policies reflect the basic philosophies of Orono. Goals and policies affecting the entire City are grouped in an "overall" category. In addition, more detailed goals and policies are separated under their appropriate "urban" or "rural" classification. Finally, each separate CMP chapter has detailed goals and policies relating to that particular subject. GENERAL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Planning Goals 1. The foremost guiding principle and goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, and all Lakes and natural resources, its water quality, and its recreational assets. This goal continues a commitment established half a century ago. It includes preservation of the associated marshes, wetlands and natural drainageways as the primary, most practical and cost efficient method of preventing flooding and of filtering out the nutrient pollution from stormwater runoff. Maintaining a low-density rural area away from the lake, and managing the quality of runoff that flows directly to the lake, are important elements of this goal. 2. To retain the existing urban -rural land use pattern on a permanent basis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 13 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 3. To maintain our local character and identity. This local character is defined by strong neighborhoods, preponderance of wildlife, open spaces, lakes, and wetlands. 4. To protect and preserve our many natural resources including all lakes, creeks, marshes, wetlands, woodlands, groundwater and steep slopes. 5. To preserve open space, light, air, and solar access for all citizens while maintaining night sky. 6. To protect the general public health, safety and welfare through the development of ordinances, policies, and infrastructure that provides safe, efficient streets and neighborhoods, transportation alternatives, parks and opens spaces. To guide investment and reinvestment in the City at densities consistent with environmental protection and the planned land use pattern. The city's focus is in development and redevelopment is preservation of established character, rather than the creation of a new character. 8. To protect the financial stability of the City, providing an adequate level of services at efficient cost to the taxpayer. Orono's Planning Policies 1. Future development will be guided to protect and enhance the Lake Minnetonka watershed. Lake Minnetonka has local and regional significance as a vital ingredient in human experience and in the quality of life of all Orono residents. No development will be permitted that would have a detrimental effect on the Lake. 2. Urbanization will not be expanded into the existing rural areas. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan, and therefore the Urban area will not be expanded into the Rural Area. Urban services will not be expanded into the Rural Area except when necessary to protect the public health, or to avoid or eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. 3. The existing and planned Urban Area is fixed. Orono's Urban Area is fixed by the various elements of the Community Management Plan, and is shown on Map 3B-2. 4. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is not strictly defined by the MUSA boundary. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is defined by the density of development and level of public services intended to be provided. Orono will not define its Urban and Rural areas based merely on whether municipal sewer is provided. The MUSA boundary has been amended by the City in the past to allow for retrofitting of existing Rural Area neighborhoods with municipal sewer, to solve existing sewage treatment problems. In these areas, the zoning has not changed to allow for additional development at urban densities, and urban services other than sewer have not been provided. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 14 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 5. Future expansions of the sewer system into the Rural Area to solve existing neighborhood sewage treatment problems or along the lakeshore to avoid or eliminate potential negative impacts on lake water quality will not result in a reclassification of those neighborhoods from Rural to Urban. Expansion of the sewer system into the Rural Area will not result in the provision of additional urban services, nor will it result in changes to allowed development densities. 6. Additional urban development will occur only in the designated Urban Area. Additional urban development will occur in the urbanized areas consistent with the capacities of the existing urban services and at limited densities consistent with all environmental constraints. 7. Additional rural development will occur in the designated Rural Area. Additional rural residential and quasi -agricultural development can occur in the rural areas without taxing the limited capacities of existing rural services. Rural development will occur at limited densities consistent with self-supporting on-site sewer and water services and with maintenance of natural amenities, open space and other rural community characteristics. 8. Natural features and sensitive environments will be protected by ordinances based upon extensive inventory, analysis and established environmental protection guidelines. Natural resource information will be used and evaluated in review of all significant land use developments. Ordinance provisions will be reasonably established, fairly interpreted and strictly enforced. 9. Historically significant buildings, places and settings will be identified and preserved. The character of Orono receives much of its identity from our unique pattern of development. Individual sites provide a glimpse into the past and are a valuable addition to Orono Character. These sites include the Orono Golf Course, and the Pillsbury Summer House. Programs will be established to identify and help preserve this heritage for future generations. Where necessary, special consideration will be made to encourage retention of significant public or private amenities. 10. Housing programs will be pursued to provide safe, affordable homes for all citizens. Housing opportunities will be provided for citizens of all ages and income levels either within Orono or within the adjacent town centers of Long Lake and Spring Park where the necessary support services for a wider range of housing opportunities are readily available. Rehabilitation programs will be identified and stressed to increase the livability and energy efficiency of the existing housing stock. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 15 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 11. Transportation facilities will be provided and improved consistent with local service needs and with a coordinated program of area -wide transportation priorities. Transportation planning will be sensitive to local land use and environmental concerns, and to local service needs. Through traffic adds significant traffic level through limited corridors through the lake region. The city will encourage its transportation partners to develop and implement improvements and transportation alternatives to ensure safe and efficient travel. Levels of maintenance will vary between urban and rural areas. Alternative routings and alternative transportation modes will be explored. 12. Programs and services will be coordinated between the many interrelated governmental agencies. Orono will continue to pursue coordinated services with the County, with adjacent municipalities, with the school districts and with specialized districts such as lake conservation, watershed or joint powers districts, all for the purpose of providing consistent, high quality services at affordable cost to the taxpayer. 13. Orono strives to establish a low profile governmental presence emphasizing individual citizen responsibility rather than over- inclusive governmental authority. Orono recognizes that the individual citizen often can do for himself more quickly, efficiently and at lesser cost, things that in other areas are left to government by default. It is here that the strength of the Orono citizens has its most direct benefit in maintaining our rural, small-town vitality. 14. Orono will continue to emphasize active citizen participation in policy formation and policy administration. Local meetings have always had the friendly, open-door characteristic of New England Town Meetings. Communication with the residents, both on general matters and on specific neighborhood development proposals, will continue to be a priority policy of this Plan and of this City. Education will continue to be a critical element in establishment and administration of City policies. 15. It is Orono's firm conviction that the goals, policies and programs outlined in this CMP undeniably in the best interests of all Orono citizens, both current and future. This Plan emphasizes full use of existing public services and facilities without leap -frog expansion of unnecessary services into Orono's rural areas. This Plan reinforces the national concern for energy conservation through retrofitting and rehabilitation of existing structures, through coordinated transportation planning and through emphasis on natural rather than mechanical solutions to storm water and waste water treatment. This Plan emphasizes reliance on and efficient use of natural features and existing services rather than arbitrary duplication of efforts between competing municipalities. This Plan is built on understanding and acceptance of Orono's unique location and environmental constraints. Working with these factors will improve our quality of life; ignoring them would destroy it. This plan serves future residents of Orono through the preserve and enhancement of the uniqueness of Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 16 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Urban Area Goals And Policies Urban Community Goals 1. To maintain the identity and small town character of the individual neighborhoods. Urban developments will be developed to continue the architecturally diverse house pattern previously established. 2. To provide opportunities for neighborhood commerce, education and social facilities to serve Orono's urban and rural residents alike. 3. To improve the quality of life and neighborhood aesthetics while maintaining the existing diversity of housing and shopping opportunities. 4. To prevent overly dense development or any excessive demand for services which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated wetlands or drainage areas. 5. To provide municipal facilities and services at a level consistent with small town urban requirements. Urban Planning Policies 1. Future urban development will be carefully integrated into the existing neighborhoods. 2. The City will encourage commercial facilities and social centers that complement the existing available services. The city recognizes the value commercial facilities and social centers have on the quality of life for Orono residents. The City will favor those developments oriented toward local neighborhood needs, recognizing the integrated service area of all adjoining lake -area communities. 3. Private landowners and developers will be encouraged to improve the image of their neighborhoods. Programs will be pursued to encourage maintenance and upkeep of all properties and to promote the rehabilitation of older or under -used properties. Commercial areas will be encouraged to provide a coordinated approach to identity, aesthetic and neighborhood appeal. 4. Urban developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's urban neighborhoods are located very close to Lake Minnetonka; therefore any urban development has the potential for direct adverse impact on the lake. Storm water runoff control, erosion and sedimentation are particular concerns requiring careful design attention in all new urban developments. In addition, particular care will be taken to preserve open spaces, wooded areas and solar access. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 17 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 5. Urban developments will be limited to the extent that they can be adequately served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted to exceed the existing or planned capacity of local roads, utilities, parks, police and fire protection. Where development within the urban area requires local extension of roads or utilities, such extension will be the full responsibility of the developer, not the general taxpayer. 6. Higher levels of public services will be provided in the urban area than in the rural area. The greater land use density and the greater number of residents combine to require more intensive levels of public services. Police, fire, and ambulance calls are more frequent. Roads, parking lots, parks, and playgrounds require more maintenance. Public sewer and water is necessary because of population density and proximity to the lake. All of these factors combine to increase the cost of government in the urban portions of the city. Rural Area Goals And Policies Rural Community Goals 1. To maintain the rural character of open spaces and closeness to the natural environment. 2. To retain the opportunity for rural commerce such as farming, orchards, greenhouses, stables and similar activities which require limited services but relatively large amounts of open space. 3. To retain the opportunity for a diversity of housing types and alternative use expectations. 4. To prevent the encroachment of urban development or any activity which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated watershed. 5. To evaluate public service requests so as to limit the financial burdens on the community and the landowners alike. Rural Planning Policies Future rural developments will be guided so as to have minimal impact on the land or on the existing rural neighborhoods. Rural developments will be permitted only at rural densities and only where the land is capable of self-supporting the necessary on-site sewer and water services. Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities. 2. Rural neighborhoods will be reserved for low-density residential and quasi - agricultural land uses. Commercial services will continue to be provided in the urban areas of Orono and adjoining municipalities. No new commercial or industrial activities will be permitted in the rural service area except those quasi -agricultural uses that do not require central sewer or other urban services. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 18 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 3. Rural developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's rural land includes major or minor drainageways and wetlands all intricately tied to Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, each rural development will require particular care to prevent encroachment on these vital resources and to ensure protection of the soil vegetation and drainage patterns. In addition, consideration will be given to protection of woodlands and special open vistas having general public benefit, as well as protection and enhancement of drainageways and water quality; protection and enhancement of ecological communities; reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections throughout the City; augmentation and preservation of enclosure and buffering; preservation and improvement of views; and preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. 4. Rural developments will be limited to the extent that they can be served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted if it requires the extension of unplanned urban services into the rural area. Privately constructed and maintained roads and recreational facilities will be favored over requirements for additional public facilities. Buildings and structures must be located and designed for rural levels of police and fire protection. 5. Special planning considerations are required for those rural areas located on Lake Minnetonka islands. It is impossible for the City to provide island residents with normal public services such as police, fire, ambulance, sanitation or transportation. Therefore, all of these needs must be met by the individual property owners who choose to develop land on the islands. Because of this combination of factors, the City has determined that private island development must be managed in a manner that allows for private individual use of recreational property only in strict compliance with enhanced development and environmental performance standards applicable specifically to the islands. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 19 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STRATEGY PLANNING GOALS 1. To identify community characteristics, needs, issues and aspirations. 2. To formulate and maintain long-term goals for future community growth and management. 3. To formulate and maintain policies, ordinances and programs designed to implement the community goals. 4. To continue, rather than change, the direction of development and preservation established by previous Community Management Plans. PLANNING POLICIES 1. The CMP is designed as a management tool for city officials, staff and citizens in the conduct of both public and private activity within the city. 2. The CMP is designed to encourage effective and coordinated methods of implementation to properly balance private incentives and the protection of the public interest. 3. The CMP is designed to help coordinate the various implementation tools such as regulations, ordinances, public procedures, and public expenditures. 4. The CMP is intended to be a living document to be used on a day to day basis. 5. The CMP is intended to be reviewed, and updated when necessary. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 20 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3A ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN Environmental Protection Plan 3A-2 Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics 3A-4 Table 3A-2: Lake Sizes 3A-4 Table 3A-3: Streams 3A-5 Figure 3A-1 Land Cover 3A-8 Surface Water Management Plan 3A-11 Flood plain Management 3A-13 Shoreland Management 3A-14 Table 3A-4: Solar Potential 3A-14 Figure 3A-2: Solar Potential 3A-15 Quality of Life Preservation 3A-16 Environmental Protection Policies 3A-16 Appendix Map 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Map 3A-2: Wetlands and Drainageways Map 3A-3: Soil Associations Map 3A-4: MLCCS Level 1 Land Cover Map 3A-5: Flood Map Map 3A-6: Shoreland Overlay City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 1 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan CMP PART 3(A) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN The presence and character of relatively undisturbed natural resource areas including lakes, marshes, wetlands, and woodlands is a major factor affecting the character of Orono. LAKE MINNETONI" Lake Minnetonka is the single most significant natural feature in Orono and in the entire western part of Hennepin County. Lake Minnetonka, as shown on Map 3A-1, is actually a series of separate lakes or "bays" interconnected by narrows or channels. The outlet of Lake Minnetonka is at Gray's Bay in the City of Minnetonka, where it discharges to Minnehaha Creek which eventually flows into the Mississippi River. ■ Lake Minnetonka has substantial public value as a recreational asset, as an environmental resource and as a setting for private residential development. ■ Lake Minnetonka is dependent upon watershed runoff for all replenishment. Lake Minnetonka is not fed by any spring or river inlet. All water is received from precipitation falling within the immediate watershed. Most of this water enters the Lake by direct runoff through a series of five major streams and their associated lakes, marshland and sub -watersheds. Lake Minnetonka's ecology makes it easily susceptible to pollution hazards. The combination of a single -source local water supply, relatively small watershed area, many channel restrictions between separate bays, and a single outlet, have resulted in Lake Minnetonka having an extremely long 25 -year flush out period for complete water change. The hazard is that once pollutants enter the Lake, they tend to remain for a long time and they are not easily diluted. ■ Lake Minnetonka has historically suffered from two problems which directly affect its environmental health and its value as a public amenity. One problem which has been worsening with urbanization trends is a deterioration in water quality caused by eutrophication. Eutrophication is the aging process by which natural waters are enriched with nutrients that may stimulate excessive plant growth, including floating algae, attached algae, and rooted weeds. Eutrophication may occur naturally, as sediments accumulate in lake basins over geologic time or it may be induced artificially as a result of human activities, as in Lake Minnetonka. Much of Lake Minnetonka has become more eutrophic during the past century, but sedimentation has been negligible. Instead, the accelerated eutrophication of the Lake, which is due to increased inputs of nutrient elements, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, is evidenced by the increased growth of algae and weeds. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 2 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan ■ The other problem is hydrologic instability. Because the lake level is dependent upon precipitation, wide ranges in water elevation have occurred over the years. During the 1930's, a general drought left the lake below normal level for 11 years with a maximum decline of more than 6 feet. In recent years, however, more urbanization has increased the amounts of direct storm water runoff resulting in high water levels and in some cases flooding problems for low-lying properties. Management of runoff and protection of water quality have now become primary objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Map 3A-1 illustrates Lake Minnetonka's relationship with the city of Orono. The problems of Lake Minnetonka were intensively studied by many agencies in the 1960's and 19701s. These agencies included the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the City of Orono. The major publications addressing Minnetonka's problems and which formed the basis for the goals and policies of Orono's 1980, 2000-2020, and 2010-2030 CMPs, and this update, are as follows: 1969 Overall Plan for Water Management; MCWD 1971 "Harza Study", A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka; LMCD & Mn. PCA 1973 Shoreland Management Regulations of the Mn. DNR 1973 Stormwater Impact Investigation for the Metropolitan Council 1974 Surface Water Management Plan for the City of Orono 1979 208 Water Quality Management Plan for the Metropolitan Council Orono's special involvement with Lake Minnetonka is based upon the real concerns of our affected citizens and our intimate and important impact on the total lake environment. While Orono's population is not as large as that of other municipalities in the Lake Minnetonka Watershed, Orono does have the largest land area and potential environmental impact of any local unit of government. Orono is the largest city totally within the Watershed. Orono has one-sixth of the total dry land in the watershed, one-eighth of the wetlands and one-third of the lake surface. Orono encompasses one-third of Lake Minnetonka's total shoreline. Over 30% of the total Watershed's surface runoff flows through or from Orono on its way to the Lake. No other community has the same potential as Orono for affecting Lake Minnetonka's water quality or water quantity, therefore, no other single community has as heavy a responsibility for careful protection of this general resource as Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 3 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics Lake Classification Lake Minnetonka Portion within City of % in Orono DNR Orono City of Orono Water Surface Area 14,300 acres 4,750 acres 33% Shoreline Length 131 miles' 40.4 miles2 31% Watershed Area 71 sq. mi. dry land 22 sq. mi. wetlands 13.4 sq. mi. 19% 162-P 7 sq. mi. other water bodies 23 sq. mi. basin 2.7 sq. mi. 12% 985.5' of Lk. Mtka 123 sq. mi. 0.6 sq. mi. 9% 7.4 sq. mi. 32% 89 89 4.1 sq. mi. 20% ' MCWD Water Resources Management Plan 2City calculation ORONO'S LAKES. CREEKS AND WETLANDS Other significant lakes in Orono include Long Lake, Mooney Lake, Lydiard Lake, Lake Classen and Dickey's Lake. Lydiard Lake and Dickey's Lake drain into Long Lake which flows into Long Lake Creek and eventually Tanager Lake (bay) of Lake Minnetonka. Lake Classen drains into Stubbs Bay of Lake Minnetonka and Mooney Lake drains through Plymouth and Wayzata before discharging into Wayzata Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Table 3A-2: Lake Sizes and Shoreland Classifications Lake Classification Total Basin Basin Area in OHWL DNR Area (Acres) City of Orono Protected Waters (Acres) Inventory Number Natural Environment NE Lake Classen 117 117 974.5' 162-P Dickey Lake 26 26 985.5' 161-W ch Lake (South Basin Only) (Includes 78 ac. wetlands) 89 89 930.0' 140-P Lydiard Lake (Includes 20 ac. wetlands) 33 33 970.9' 159-P Lake Katrina Recreational Development RD Long Lake 320 210 944.3' 160-P Mooney Lake 118 10 988.0' 134-P Tanager Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) (74) ' General Develo ment GD Forest Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) (127) �14310 (127) 929.4' 139-P Lake Minnetonka 4,750 929.4' 133-P Lydiard Lake is the most rural of Orono's lakes, being surrounded by heavily wooded rolling hills. Dickey's Lake has become surrounded by low density residential development over the past 30 years. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 4 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Lake Classen is surrounded by orchards, woods and open fields with a handful of homes overlooking its' waters. The Orono School District maintains a nature study area and waterfowl ponds on Classen's east shore. Mooney Lake's shore is relatively undeveloped in Orono and Medina, but the lake's watershed has received growing pressures from urbanization in Plymouth, including usage conflicts, elevation concerns due to lack of a natural outlet, and urban storm water pollution inflow. Long Lake is the second largest and 2nd most actively used lake in Orono behind Lake Minnetonka. The east and west shores have been developed at rural residential densities. The north shore has mixed rural residential areas and one denser housing cluster dating from the 1930's. The south shore is bordered by the City of Long Lake and is urbanized to the same degree as much of Lake Minnetonka. Long Lake has experienced storm water problems as well as increased usage pressures. In recent years, the expansion of Carp and other fish have suspended solids, degrading water quality. The Cities of Medina, Long Lake, and Orono have agreed to study the issue. Orono also has identified a number of protected tributary streams which are subject to Shoreland regulations. These are shown in the following table: Table 3A-3: Protected Tributary Streams Tributary Name From: To: Section Township Range Section Township Range Long Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160-P) 118 23 10(Basin 141-P) 117 23 "Wolsfeld" Creek 27 (City limit) 118 23 6(Basin 160-P) 118 23 Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 26 (City limit) 118 23 27 118 23 Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 161-P) 118 23 34 (Basin 160-P) 118 23 Stubbs Bay Creek (aka Classen Creek) 32 (Basin 162-P) 118 23 5 (Basin 133-P) 117 23 Painter's Creek 30 (Basin 154-P) 118 3 31 (City limit) 118 23 The second most significant and most universal natural amenity in Orono is its many wetlands and marshlands comprising Lake Minnetonka's upland drainage system. Orono's nearly 1600 acres of marshland and wetlands comprise fully one-sixth of the City's land area. Map 3A-2 indicates how the marshland and drainageways are scattered throughout the City. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 5 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan These natural ponding areas serve an integral function within the natural ecological system of Lake Minnetonka. The "Harza Study" includes quantitative data identifying how the wetland soils easily retain phosphorus, and how marsh plants take up and incorporate large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus into their growing tissue. Thus, the marshlands are the primary pollution filters for Lake Minnetonka's surface water runoff. Since marshes and small lakes in the watershed aggregate nearly as much area as the main body of Lake Minnetonka, their potential for supplying water to the subsurface formations is appreciable. In addition, marshes provide diversity in the kinds of open space available within the region. They provide a habitat which is uniquely suited for certain birds and mammals. They can be utilized to provide storage of storm runoff with minimal disruption to their function as a habitat for wildlife and their ability to reduce the phosphorus input to the lake. Development Impacts on Wetlands. When urban development occurs, the function of the natural drainageways and filtration system is adversely affected in three ways: The speed and quantity of the storm water runoff are increased as the absorption ability of the land is eliminated with hardcover (houses, driveways, roads, etc.). This increase in the speed and quantity of storm water runoff causes the third adverse effect, which is the increase of the amount of nutrients which are contained in the storm water runoff which now has less time in the natural marsh filtration system to be purified before entering the lake. Nutrients contained in dying vegetation, lawn fertilizers, and from other urban sources are discharged into the lake faster and in greater quantities as the level of urbanization increases. (Harza Study) Orono does not rely solely on the ability of the natural filtration system of the marshes and drainageways to purify storm water so necessary for the preservation of Lake Minnetonka. Supplementary Stormwater Ponding & Alternatives. While Orono's Surface Water Management Plan adopted in 2002 places a significant emphasis on preservation of wetlands, it also provides for the establishment of supplementary stormwater management ponds to help counteract the impacts of development within the watershed. NURP (National Urban Runoff Program) pond design criteria are primarily based on the removal of suspended particles such as sand, silt, etc. Secondary design criteria enhance the capability of NURP ponds to remove other pollutants such as trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients (such as phosphorus) and pesticides. Phosphorus is mainly removed through biological uptake in algae and aquatic plants. When the algae die, the nutrients fall to the bottom of the pond and become part of the sediments. Ponds in the Twin Cities area designed according to NURP standards have total phosphorus removal efficiencies of 47 to 68 percent according to Walker. Possibilities for improving this include (1) increasing mean pond depth; (2) promoting infiltration; (3) promoting plug flow conditions (i.e. multiple cell ponds); (4) applying chemicals to precipitate out the orthophosphorus (alum treatments); (5) encouraging growth of certain aquatic plants; and (6) design of outlet structure to provide extended detention of large runoff events. Whether each of these enhancements can or should be incorporated is dependent on the desired level of control and other site specific conditions. Constructed wetlands have potential benefits as well as drawbacks. Additionally, the cost of constructing stormwater ponds and storm sewer systems is enormous compared to the cost of wetland preservation. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 6 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Vegetated buffers, green strips adjacent to hard surfaces, permeable pavements that incorporate runoff treatment features, and rain gardens are just some of the additional tools available for supplementing runoff management. Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds or alum treatments will give Orono an added tool to manage runoff from rural densities, but Orono will not rely solely on man-made systems for preserving water quality. ORONO'S NATURAL RESOURCES Soils Orono's land forms are highly varied as the result of four separate glacial scourings. Surface features include islands, peninsulas, narrow land bridges, the lakes, bays and marshes, and a few shallow outwash basins. The highest elevations range from about 1060 feet above mean sea level in the northern part of the City down to the normal water level of Lake Minnetonka at elevation 929.4 MSL. The soils in the City of Orono (Map 3A-3) originated from drift materials deposited by meltwaters of the glaciers. Generally, the soil types consist primarily of clay and loam materials on the uplands and organic, wet materials in the lowland areas. Consequently, the ability of each soil type to adequately accommodate development varies considerably in Orono. Careful examination of each site is needed to determine the most appropriate land use for individual properties. Orono's native vegetation is primarily woodland interspersed with localized areas of wet prairie marshlands. Northern Orono and many areas along Lake Minnetonka's shore, contain vestiges of Minnesota's Big Woods with hardwood forests of oak, maple, elm, and basswood. Much of these have been thinned into scattered stands, as shown on Map 3A-4, but major forests remain in north central and north east Orono, especially around Lydiard Lake and in the MNDNR's Wolsfeld Woods and Wood Rill nature areas. In addition, 100 year old settlements have by now added mature stands of various evergreens and other decorative trees and shrubs. Tree Preservation Policy 1. The City finds that its trees and woodlands provide numerous benefits including: soil stabilization, reduction of storm water runoff, improvement of air quality, reduction of noise pollution, protection and increase of property values, privacy, energy conservation through natural insulation, and natural habitat for birds and other wildlife. 2 It is the City's policy to preserve and protect significant trees, stands of trees and wooded buffer areas. 3. The City will study whether adoption of additional tree protection and replacement ordinances is necessary to accomplish these goals. 4. The eradication of exotic vegetation species such as buckthorn will be encouraged in all wooded areas. However, in Shoreland areas where complete removal of buckthorn may leave a relatively bare lakeshore, plans for revegetation may be required. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 7 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Orono's Ground Water Supplies Orono enjoys the same abundant ground water resources from the Twin Cities artesian basin as does most of the metropolitan area. In addition, our generally heavy clay soil layers near the surface have protected the ground waters from surface pollution. Most areas of the City have had no difficulty obtaining potable water supplies drawn from the Jordan aquifer with wells ranging in depth from 75 to 200 feet. Only occasional wells have had to go deeper. Land Cover Summary. In 2006, Hennepin County published the Natural Resource Inventory for Orono and is included here by reference. The land cover classification encompassed the entire incorporated area of the City (approximately 15,400 acres) of which fully 1/3 is open water. Artificial surfaces, which include residential areas, farmsteads, commercial lands and other areas with greater than four percent impervious surfaces, accounted for an additional 20% of Orono's total area. Forest and woodland cover combined accounted for an additional 20% of Orono, with herbaceous vegetation types (wet meadows, cattail marshes, etc.) and planted , maintained or cultivated vegetation types (agricultural crops, hayfields, pastures) each comprising 13% of the City. The figure below illustrates Orono's MLCCS Level One Land Cover. ly=W Herbaceous 1 9 vecetatiola 13°r'o Sparse Shtubland I—veaetataoll 1% 0% i Woodland 2% _open Water 33% Forests 13°�© - ljo) 14 Planted, Maintainer) Artificial or C'ulti'vated - Surface Vegetation 20% 13% Figure 3A-1 Land cover Map 3A-4 depicts Orono's land cover at the most general level (MLCCS Level 1). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 8 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Natural Resource Inventory Results. The Inventory identified 358 individual natural community remnants, covering a total of 2,549 acres or approximately one-fourth of Orono's land area. These included eight forest types, one woodland type, two shrubland types, four herbaceous wetland types, and one upland grassland type. Each of the remnants was categorized with regards to quality as either high, good, moderate or low. Nearly half of this acreage (1,148.2 acres) is encompassed in Maple -Basswood Forest remnants ranging in size from 0.2 acres to 113.2 acres. Oak Forests comprise 369 acres, and Lowland Hardwood Forests total 157 acres. Other forest types identified include Aspen Forest (4.4 acres); Tamarack Swamps (25.4 acres); Floodplain Forests (14.5 acres); Black Ash Swamps (56.9 acres); and Mixed Hardwood Swamp (3.1 acres). Oak Woodland/Brushland totals 38.0 acres. Shrublands identified in the inventory include Willow Swamp (30.4 acres) and Alder Swamp (2.8 acres). Herbaceous wetlands documented in the inventory include 568 acres of Cattail Marsh ranging from 0.1 acres to 106.1 acres in size; 11.9 acres of Wet Meadow; 2.5 acres of Poor Fen; and 74.2 acres of Mixed Emergent Marsh. Upland grasslands include Mesic Prairie totaling 29.3 acres. Aimrmate Orono does not benefit from aggregate (Sand/ gravel) resources in a commercially viable scale. Consequently, there are no plans to open or allow for aggregate mining within the city of Orono. ORONO AS A "RURAL OASIS" In 2005, the City of Orono commissioned DSU, Inc to quantify several goals intended to preserve the Cities Rural Oasis Identity. That study is retained as an appendix in the 2008-2030 CMP and is incorporated by reference here. The goals and guiding principles identified by that study are highlighted here: Goals Future development in Orono must achieve the following goals: Goal #1: Promote the conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout the city, particularly Lake Minnetonka. Goal #2: Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 9 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Guiding Principles In order to guarantee that future development in Orono will achieve the above goals, these "Guiding Principles" for development shall be followed in the City of Orono: Guiding Principle #1: Promote ecologically sensitive stormwater management. Applying an ecologically -based stormwater management system will improve ecosystems by reducing both reliance on manmade infrastructure and reducing downstream runoff of contaminants. Guiding Principle #2: Establish and maintain native ecological communities. Conserving and improving natural and semi -natural areas will provide wildlife habitat and support natural ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, buffering, etc). Guiding Principle #3: Establish and maintain ecological connections. Creating ecological connections will enhance stormwater collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for residents. Guiding Principle #4: Preserve and augment corridor enclosure. Maintaining and improving the extent of roadway corridor enclosures will promote community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character. Guiding Principle #5: Preserve views. Mitigating the visual impacts of development will also preserve the aesthetic elements of the landscape. Guiding Principle #6: Preserve and maintain landmarks and unique points of local character. Preserving distinct cultural features will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. The city, in the review of this CMP, added a 7th guiding principal: Guiding Principle #7: Continue to work to educate property owners and residents on the effects development and use action has on the environment and character of the community. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 10 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Surface Water Management Plan Introduction The City of Orono's 2018 Local Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) is an update of the 2011 SWMP. This Surface Water Management Plan has been developed to serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Orono in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. The SWMP provides an inventory of water resource related information including the results of assessments conducted by other governmental units, both local and state. From this inventory and assessment, Orono sets forth its goals and policies and implementation program. The SWMP also seeks consistency with the goals and policies of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and with the requirements and guidance provided in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Statutory Requirements This SWMP meets the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Minnesota Statute 10313.201 states that the purposes of the water management programs are to: 1. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; 4. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; 6. Promote groundwater recharge; 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and 8. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. This plan is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan, and the goals, rules and management objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) with whom Orono partners in its management activities. Though intended to serve Orono until 2028, this plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 11 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local practices and policies and to maintain Orono's compliance with MCWD rules and State of Minnesota laws and rules. NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Since 2003 Orono has operated its stormwater management program under a permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This permit is called the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit and authorizes Orono to discharge stormwater to waters of the state under certain conditions. Under its permit coverage, Orono has implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to addresses the MS4 Permits six minimum control measures, as listed below: 1. Public education 2. Public involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post -construction runoff control 6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations The City's SWPPP contains several Best Management Practices within each of the listed control measures. These were identified using a self-evaluation and input process with City staff. Many of the goals and policies discussed in the SWMP are directly related to requirements listed in the NPDES program. As a result, the implementation section of this plan references items listed in the City's SWPPP. Additional information regarding the City's SWPPP Goals, Policies and Strategies The City of Orono highly values the natural resources within its jurisdiction and seeks to protect surface and groundwater storage systems, effectively manage expenditures to correct flooding and water quality problems, prevent erosion into surface waters, promote groundwater recharge, enhance wildlife habitats and water recreational facilities, and improve the water quality of all water resources. Therefore, the city established the following goals. Specific policies and implementation strategies are listed in the SWMP. Maintain or improve the physical, chemical, biological, and aesthetic condition of surface water resources. 2. Develop and implement plans as necessary to reduce pollutant loads for waters that do not meet Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) as approved by the EPA. Coordinate City efforts with applicable Implementation Plans as approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 12 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 3. Minimize and mitigate the impacts of urban stormwater runoff on water resources. 4. Manage and protect wetlands to maximize wetland functions and improve surface water resources. 5. Manage Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems to ensure proper design, installation, operation, maintenance or replacement in order to eliminate health hazards or illicit discharges to water resources. Connect properties with SSTSs to city sanitary sewer as soon as feasible. 6. Manage and protect natural upland areas adjacent to surface water resources to mitigate degradation of surface waters and increase the quantity, quality and biological diversity of natural areas. 7. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. Provide the public with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to protect and improve surface water and groundwater resources. Implementation Planning SWMP includes a plan for implementation water resource improvements. The plan identify potential projects in the following categories: 1. Stream and shoreline restoration projects. 2. Outlet control structure repair or replacement projects. Localized storage, volume reduction, and water quality improvement sites. 4. Wetland restoration sites Natural upland restoration sites. The projects included will be used for planning purposes and will require further development prior to inclusion in the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT An element of surface water management addressed in the SWMP Goals is the management of flood plains and wetlands. The City of Orono originally adopted a Flood Plain Ordinance in 1970, which has since been revised and updated on a regular basis, most recently with Hennepin County's mapping revision in November, 2016. The principles of flood plain regulation go hand-in-hand with those of stormwater management. The City will be best served by retention of open land uses which would locate permanent structures and artificial obstructions in a manner that would not obstruct the passage of waters nor destroy the natural public waters, marshes and wetlands within the City. The Ordinance is compliant with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 13 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59--78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Orono's defined flood plains are depicted on Map 3A-5. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT The City of Orono in 1992 adopted a comprehensive Shoreland Management Ordinance, pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, Minnesota Regulations Parts 6120.2500-6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. In 2012, this ordinance was amended to better promote the public health, safety and general welfare by providing for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands abutting public waters that exist within the City's corporate boundaries. Orono's defined Shoreland Overlay District is depicted on Map 3A-6. SOLAR ACCESS PROTECTION Minnesota Statutes 473.859 requires that local comprehensive plans include an element for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The City of Orono will protect such access by requiring minimum standards for lot sizes, amounts of open space, yard setbacks, and maximum height of buildings for urban and rural residents. Land uses should not preclude the possible use of solar energy systems. The Metropolitan Council has estimated the City's solar potential as follows: Table 3A-4 Solar Potential Rooftop Gross Rooftop Generation Gross Potential Potential Generation Potential Potential (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr)Z (Mwh/yr)Z 14,656,623 1 442,509 1,465,662 44,251 Figure 3A-2 displays the City's Solar Suitability Analysis. Protecting solar access means protecting solar collectors (or the location of future collectors) from shading by adjacent structures or vegetation. Existing structures and buildings in the City generally do not present significant shading problems for solar energy systems and the City's promise of open, rural spaces is intended to protect that condition. Most single family attached and detached homes are one or two stories and most multi -family, commercial, and industrial buildings are three stories or less. Solar energy systems and equipment are generally a permitted use if attached to structures. The zoning ordinance provides standards for the protection and establishment of these solar energy systems. While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal building would be free of shading City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 14 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or alternative to conventional fuels. Gross Solar Potential City of Orono, Hennepin County zn'17P8 Extent cf Main Mao Figure 3A-2 5 1 2 3 4 a�e Miles ^ Gross Solar Potential {lAfatt-hours per Year) High :1277133 Low: 900001 _ solar Potential under 900,DDC watt-hours per year �.l County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries ' Wetlands and Open Water Features Source_ University of Minnesota U -Spatial Statewide Solar Raster City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 15 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan QUALITY OF LIFE PRESERVATION Orono's primarily residential character has resulted in an environment that is relatively free from the noise pollution of major roadways, the light pollution of commercial and industrial development, and other negative impacts such as odors, vibration, toxic emissions, glare and visual clutter that are common in non-residential areas. The residents of Orono place a high value on the quality of life provided by the lack of such negative impacts. The City of Orono is committed to preserving the qualities that make Orono an attractive residential community while providing an adequate level of the necessary services, commerce and industries required to support the community. Preservation of Dark Skies A key element that adds to the quality of life in Orono is its dark night sky. The ability to view a naturally dark, star -filled sky is a precious resource as valuable as our forested landscapes and our fresh air and clean water. But this inspiring amenity can be easily lost in the presence of inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting. While artificial lighting is necessary for safety and security, the quality of that lighting can have a profound effect on our night-time security and enjoyment. Night Sky Policies 1. The City finds that preservation of the night sky is an important factor in maintaining the quality of life in Orono, and that inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting can lead to glare, light trespass, sky glow and other negative impacts inconsistent with dark skies. 2. Orono will encourage the use of efficient and properly designed outdoor lighting to limit the occurrence of these negative impacts while providing for the necessary levels of safety, security and visibility appropriate to the area being illuminated. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES The Goals and Policies of this Chapter are basic to the remaining sections of the Community Management Plan. Without environmental stability, Orono's character and vitality would be lost. With environmental care and concern, Orono citizens expect their forefather's heritage to live on for generations to come. Environmental Protection Goals 1. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and all other lakes in Orono. 2. Expand education of the benefits and value of environmental features in Orono. 3. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the City's marshland, wetland and natural drainage system. 4. Provide for surface water management such that the City is protected from both flooding hazards and pollution hazards. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 16 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 5. Protect the City's ground water resources from pollution and from depletion. 6. Protect the City from air, water and noise pollution. 7. Preserve, conserve, and enhance open space, light and air, including solar access for all properties. 8. Preserve a reasonable amount of native woodlands as an integral part of Orono's heritage. 9. Protect and preserve a reasonable amount of natural wildlife habitat in woodlands and wetlands. 10. Protect the land from soil erosion and the hazards of dust and siltation. 11. Preserve greenways and open space corridors. 12. Promote conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout Orono, particularly Lake Minnetonka. 13. Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. 14. Preserve Orono's night skies and minimize light pollution. General Policies For Natural Resource Management 1. Orono will promote and support the formulation and implementation of environmental protection policies by other Lake Minnetonka area municipalities and responsible government agencies. 2 Environmental protection policies will continue to be utilized in the formation of all other goals and policies in this CMP. Orono's commitment to environmental quality is carried throughout each element in this comprehensive plan, coloring the goals, policies and implementation practices in every facet of municipal responsibility. 3. Development density will be limited to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. 4. Surface water runoff will be directed through the natural drainage system. Direct runoff into the lake will be avoided and will be prohibited whenever possible. 5. Natural drainageways will be favored over artificial storm sewers. Where storm sewers are needed, all efforts shall be taken to minimize their impacts on receiving waters. 6. The wetlands and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as the only economically practical method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Orono's recently updated wetland protection ordinances in concert with the additional regulatory authority of the MCWD, the MnDNR, MnBWSR and the Corps of Engineers will continue to provide an aggressive program to retain and enhance the viability of the City'swetlands. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 17 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 7. Protection of the City's marshland, wetlands and drainageways shall include protection of adjoining lands and prevention of drainage, filling, dredging or wetland vegetation removal. 8. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with MnDNR Shoreland Management regulations for Recreational Development lakes, the City will continue to prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. In conjunction with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will continue to be refined and enforced to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 9. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. The establishment and preservation of vegetated buffers along lake shorelines will be promoted and encouraged. Clearcutting of the lakeshore will continue to be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection as well as bioengineering (plant -based) solutions for shoreline stabilization will be encouraged. The use of artificially constructed seawalls will be discouraged except where no other shoreline stabilization options are feasible. 10. Lake bed alterations will be discouraged because of adverse short-term and long-term effects on water quality. Dredging will be deemed appropriate in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. 11. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. Most of the City's identified floodplains are located along the shoreline or within designated marshlands and will be protected by other provisions applicable to those areas. 12- Natural resource investigation will be required as part of all development proposals. This will include topographical information, soil analysis, drainage plans, vegetation plans, erosion control measures and similar site data related to each project, whether public or private. The extent of each such review will be determined by probable environmental impact. 13. On-site water retention facilities will be required as part of all residential, commercial or industrial development projects whenever necessary to maintain or improve the existing storm water runoff patterns as required by law and Ordinance. 14. Land use and development will not be permitted at the expense of environmental protection. 15. Erosion control plans and programs will be required in all land alteration projects. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 18 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 16. Erosion control Best Management Practices shall be applied to all land alteration projects. 17. Citizen efforts to protect and enhance the natural environment will be encouraged. The City will encourage individual citizens and private groups or organizations to be pro -active in the preservation of the environment in which they live. Activities such as reforestation, prairie and wetland restoration, buckthorn removal, minimizing use of phosphorus on lawns establishment of lakeshore buffer strips and rain gardens, lake and stream trash cleanup, and other citizen -driven efforts are an important element in Orono's commitment to environmental protection. 18. Protection and preservation of greenways and open space corridors will be considered as part of the development process. The City will strive to provide connectivity between and among natural and semi- natural open spaces. Remnant natural areas will be preserved to the greatest extent possible, and will be connected where appropriate by greenways that may incorporate water resources and larger wetland systems, semi -natural communities, and restoration of degraded natural areas. 19. New development will be required to adhere to the methods of Conservation Design in order to achieve the City's environmental protection goals. New development shall adhere to the six Guiding Principles established through the Orono Rural Oasis Study, including: ■ Promotion of ecologically sensitive stormwater management. ■ Establishment and maintenance of native ecological communities. ■ Establishment and maintenance of ecological connections. ■ Preservation and augmentation of corridor enclosures. ■ Preservation of views. ■ Preservation and maintenance of landmarks and unique points of local character. 20. Preservation of Orono's dark night skies will be promoted by encouraging the use of appropriate outdoor lighting design. Urban Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot widths will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. The City will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in its ongoing efforts to limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 2. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Changes to the topography of lakeshore lots with the intent of creating `walkout' situations will be discouraged because such land alterations result in an unnatural lakeshore character. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 19 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 3. Direct runoff into the lake will be minimized. Standards regarding the amount of impervious hardcover will continue to be aggressively enforced for residential properties within 1000 feet of the shoreline. The percentage of hardcover allowed within established lakeshore setback zones shall be limited in accordance with Orono's hardcover ordinance which has been in effect in form since 1975. 4. All existing urban wetlands will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 5. City maintenance practices will be designed to improve storm water quality, including salt use and snow storage policies. 6. A significant amount of natural woodlands and open space will be retained on each property. Retention of the natural environment requires careful siting and preservation of trees and open space on each urban property. 7. All developments will be designed to assure protection of light, air, and solar access for neighboring properties. Requirements for minimum lot size, amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum building heights will be designed to assure protection of these values for all urban residents. Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the pollution loading of rural marshes and drainageways. Rural densities will be low enough to ensure permanent reliance upon satisfactory on-site sewer and water systems where municipal sewer is not feasible and to ensure that rates of phosphorus and nitrogen generation will not adversely affect the water quality in the natural drainage system. 2. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate homesites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our abundant wildlife. 3. Rural wetlands and marshland will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 4. The City will promote farming and animal management practices designed to conserve the soil and ground water and minimize pollution. 5. Land use standards will limit the impact of rural encroachment on Orono's rural lakeshore areas. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 20 All 2040 Comprehensive Plan Lake Minnetonka O BOLTON EK Orono, MN February 2018 lr1��' Real People. Real Solutions. I I I Rice Lake I I I Independence Pioneer Creek Medicine e\- Lake l i Medina�J L II— I I Maple ` I Plain I Lower Lake I L— �..—..—..—..—..—..—..—..—..—. _ - -Minnetonka , ,1 Cr Y E 1 BaLake Long Lake — -------------- Minnetonka •�-�.�''�' ��... ... r t-� eKe .. 1 Orono 2 Wayzata Minnehaha ♦_ 'Creek 1 • 1• — • I • 1 /\ 1 . / Woodland I\ � Mlnnetrista t4nn to onka.Beach • 1 1 L — SpringLPark 1 • . — r j I ,. •� s ��J �� Deephavenl I •� S _ Mound I \ i / • ` Tonka Bay / I—I I I Minnetonka Greenwood'\" I I I Shorewood �I II Excelsior C �tV` (! r — "7 I I in Countv I I / Car I Upper I Lake ' netonka I Legend e J 1 + • � City Limits I I r -i Surrounding I Communities I County Boundary � I 0 1.5 Miles I Source: MnGeo Chaska Creek I 'S Lake Minnetonka Le-rr� Watershed Boundary Chanhassen Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams Figure 3A-1 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� k�' Orono, MN sit co Katrina rn � m ..............._ . °x . w Moon' Turner Road 12 r -° o Lake q ` Drake Dr c° 0 z z 1 j a a r I `o ~ 6th Ave N v II 3 ickeiz x Lake c �;`0 ELoad ! ° Lake — Oee' f~ Pve N Classen m 3 m f Spra' L z tier. a tir ;$ ydiard m- 0 + ��, KelleyIprY ` Long Lake a°, ° a oa """' • Lake �, d i\16 �� R _0 12 Daniels St t c _ r d 0 1�`°G d R !� Orchard4l Way , OiO LL Moline Road a a, e m Grand Ave �, 4 �o y �� . 1 wn Roaq Lai G � og La. 19 N U) U) . .. 26 eaYsige R ✓� �� ... °dd IJI Cy4 'w .rn J m 1 Stubbs N oad• rte° Bay rn PainterR �r v L...• °m 3 Fox St e� W Branch Road Icj dN`e.W Ln 1 F caa 'County Road 151 Brow, Fey (i North Arm Tanager Bay t Maxwell Lake Bay French Sunnyfield Road E lJ Forest Z Marsh LL z Lake ° c Jenning's A M Bay 1 0 5 v 4th Ave N N Shore Or o� M R°ad E m° `' �• "Y2a'ta Blvd E F ' yc Smith Bracketts Game Farm T Point c �• •► I 0 o i West �•' •' Dutch 1 Arm Crystal Bay Bohr- •• ♦ � Lake > m 1 Point.. • . . Harrison • • — .�' • ' ;. Bay •� E �• ' 1 Lynwood Blvd c • • .. .. . Ot; ; ; Shoreline Or eye r • 1 Lafayette 1 Bay . � Legend �''� �'• ' e •♦ _•.r: City Limits Lakes & Ponds ,a Spri%- I Park Carman'sI ••� •. o�j Bay ► Bav "� 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams •� K x•.41 �.• � '•� ._.._.._.._.._.. 0 3,500 ��J ' �. Feet e1N ' �• Ca Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, • �•. Po, 1 Hennepin County, MnDOT �'' — " — • • — ( /� Bets !k w d � Wetlands � & E BOLTON K February 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. rte• 22�jq P,e � Z' . •.- 19th Ave I Y Z J Ave-]' N �Pve r— �I ��C � z 0 5 v 4th Ave N 1Jrd,Ave 44tE "Y2a'ta Blvd E F Highway112 E Wayzata Bay a�Rutledge Road ��« f r �� Js% Day PIS �. J ar \Q Wetlands Stormwater National c Ponds Wetlands Inventory rn i Figure 3A-2 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M co 0 Turner Road v 0 0 y Drake Dr o � U 0 U , GteEr t Q W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E Game Dutch Lake m Legend City Limits 1++t 2040 MUSA i Soils February 2018 12 star_ 1 o • Moon ,.. .. _ .. _„ .�,.,. ..,. _ �..�....�....._....�,...�....� _ .._ ...�..,�,� d ��� GY�g� �, 1 __ 1 Lake Troy 0 .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ . . _ .. _ .. ..� . _ _ .. _ . .. _ ... _ .. _ z ��IL c m_ •� Z Z a c o o 6th Ave N d �ti F Lake '� _° , moa Pve N Clas 1 m m *SpJ`Oo, 1A L i Kelley P_k,. y..� 10 19thl Ave 0 C Z i U -�� r� 'a r a�''. ^ �# , 2 • ,= aniels St 1 i _ _rLL 8th Avey, N _ �L �,- m o e�` w� 1 Orchard WaYZa O� I s 1 1 Moline Road o m 1+ Grand Ave �. o 11 4 1 CL awn Ro � 9' La -k,-4 t _ 1 �JM e d 3 r 9 N �; �� to �° �t� ♦ 1 � v e 1 w- Lakes & PondsSpnnc `tea Carman's pr, i Ba; / Bay ! d, Rivers & Streams a°� 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT < ewe 4%b %b Ca. f� Por i 12 Ivd E Wayzata Bay Soils By Drainage Class I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Unclassified �B/D A C A/D C/D N Z c J B ['.21 Figure 3A-3 ays�ae 1 f 1 o • Rosa i�1 d ��� GY�g� �, 1 __ 1 �1 ! ; V ♦¢' i� ! Stubbs 1 y �' 1 1 1 ��IL Bay 1.1 110 1 1 .. r `Ice) % d '0 Fox St 1 v Ln rv�e 1 County Road 151 1,r North : �Brownsrw'wArm Bay Maxwell ' ,� 0' 6 Z Bay �Ma, FrenchForest jake LakeJenning':BayN Shore Dr o< aytBracketts Point i i West r'r"�'♦ ! ♦ � Crystal i 1 Arm Bohns If ♦� i C7 Bay Pointe •�Nib ' Mob i Harrison ! I�r I� ���� Bay �line 1 Or ! / Lafayette i e<r Bay Lakes & PondsSpnnc `tea Carman's pr, i Ba; / Bay ! d, Rivers & Streams a°� 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT < ewe 4%b %b Ca. f� Por i 12 Ivd E Wayzata Bay Soils By Drainage Class I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Unclassified �B/D A C A/D C/D N Z c J B ['.21 Figure 3A-3 26• 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M Turner Road o d' Drake Dr o U e'r �ID ate t Q n O C 7 0 Moline Road O W a 19 N W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E R 0 cc m Game Farm Road E Dutch Lake Road off/ Jenning's Bay Harrison Bay Legend e City Limits Lakes & Ponds +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Minnesota Land Cover Classification Katrina \ (\ 12 ' ' Star s Yo Pnoon _.�:._. _e._...,. ...,.......,-.._.....«.�_ a = e Teo .E. _ .1 z [ _ .= 0.,o 0 0 �«««_«««, 6th d 1 3 Oa ve N 1 op o An « o, 1z m e — L KelleylPkNyw. *+ � 1so 01 + �1 February 2018 19thlAve St 8th Ave N _ _rLL s i2 1. WayZd� r O" S 1 1 1� t w� R Orchard o m x 1 + Grand Ave �n •,r�r �• �< ,� 1 1 w. 9 Lak n 'l ' 1 1, wf 1 °yr 1 O � �,,,♦ 1 w � . . i � * , L� Ba 1 � � _` f 1 �. � , ; � ' • ' 1 , .. I wee 110 2 Ix 12 CD ¢ r 1 i 1 1 1• w rn lake cSt! FOX St i'� C 01 Ln 1 a North 140 *0e Brow, 0 Wa Y �.c Arm Ma �♦ keJ ea MLCCS f , Bay � French Forest �1,. Marsh; 11. 5-10% Lake v �i *° ! Impervious 12. 11-25% N Shore Dr o j Impervious Smiti_ R` ` Bracketts ! Bav 13. 26-50% Point i Impervious West I� 4%b i 1 Arm Crystal Bohr; �• ♦�, ! 14. 51-75% 1 Bay Pointop Impervious %b 4f 4f 15. 76-100% 1 ! Impervious �y�� 1 1 1 ! 3 21. Short `O� Irk Lafayette 1 ! a'` Grasses F, 1 i�--- —`,Bay ♦♦ I' a 22. Agricultural 1 �� ♦ ,�♦ I� \Qar Land 4023. Maintained _ I a Sprinc; 1 Carman's I� Tall Grass Park ,I , Bay Ba" �I p! 1 ; ��I Aa,�p' 24. Tree 0 # Plantation TT �l ewe �►,`,►ftb Ca r�I 7101: ! ft. � _. � � ..ts is QBOLT MENK Ivd E Real People. Real Solutions. z c J N 31. Forest 32. Wetland dOu Forest Figure 3A-4 51. Shrubland 52. Wetland Shrubs 61. Tall Grasses 62. Wetland Emergent Veg. 63. Dry Tall Grasses 90. Open Water 92. Wetland Open Water v 0 0 x .2I i 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� 4 Orono, MN FEMA Floodplain � & E BOLTON K February 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. vKatrina °.�' ' ' i'* ` / m Moon r� P e ch G + rn Turner Road o .ate 2 ..� StarF .._.. .�.. ---..�....�....._..,.-� i+: � � �` Lake'.. T' c � � .°} .. O CD --w ■■r..i.r o.�s$'1j�f.�ry �a..� .�..�• �sei •.�a3 •.�..i La - _ray J �th•-Ay o w _ _ ■ /' x �� 19th Ave ` 1 { ,. W, I Drake Dr 3 +xr�. il • c f. m r '0 • z no a y Y v a 0 6th Ave N o eK vCla e N Laks 1 m = ° L A �z PiT, Lydiard o o Y Lon Lake ey r•_* Q: a a 1 d R �° `.. ; gth�A• —O Daniels st 1 8th Ave N �— a Q� N+'Ii ' o e Wayzd O� s 1 '- o y._ o �' d �o Or Moline Road a e m Grand Ave �n �• o - 1 1 v 4th Av .. lief 'Down Ro 1 a * I� �01 W.8 Lake • f 3rd,Ave N ff+t{ 19 N ��� N • 1 'alr > 1.. . o! .. _ .. `ae� @a/ m 12 k sf F R Jh + r �1 �, m - �� 1 L aRice S aY2ata Blvd E yR* oaStu d.,# 1 ,� Bay bs i 1 • ' '. ( ,/ ke st@ F Highw Painter aSt 1 +'. r'+is., +, � ♦� 7 v � �♦ i J ��; a om��. oil Fox ° W Branch Road 'a .v -, .r. dvr Ln WayzataCoBrow, ♦ / North I0 Tanager Bay i Bay r `' � _ Arm Maxwell,./1 "F ..Lake i •i Bay French N Z _ J rf j Sunnyfield Road E Forest Z ' Marsh ,' }. / Lake D f... ` ,, ,,,• r f .. mo o Jenning's Bay m,.. m + 1_ N Shore Dr Game Farm Road E •�° R �r Smit; Bracketts - ''+ w . ♦� r •` Point '` 1 +` Cryst Dutch ' Lake i > r Bay Point�� I ♦� Harrison ♦� �� f �� `� ` .r m ` CD �. ' --wr--••,,. 1 I' Minnetonka@ Lynwood Blvd E . . . . . . o o v 1 1 �• Shoreline Dr i� Highland Ave � � r, Lafayette a Rutledge Road �w ir La Bay ♦ / Legend '�` ♦♦ E f., �� 1Q Flood Hazard Zones 1401� p / - t ♦ ��' ' 100 Year City Limits Lakes & Ponds ai S rine Cayman's''. - - 'r/ i ` Floodplain �A Park 1 Ba : I� ' o Bay 1 rF' Y / / 2040 MUSA 500 Year Rivers &Streams %° / + �� f. R ��` d��p� " Floodplain 000, �J; ' � � �fffffffffr y 0 3 500 c �' Feet ewp .. ♦�` Ca 1'W Po. 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Figure 3A-5 •���..� Hennepin County, MnDOT -� - �' epts �` � Floodway 0 0 0 N 0 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� k�' Orono, MN sit Shoreland Overlay District BOLTON February 2018 (D & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. '0 L 0 MOO/ Turner Road o �! 12 Stam " Lake d' C r.•ir�r.� �...� r_r.ra. terra rr�r7 •• E_ Drake Dr = °m z z v 1 j a M o `o T • 6th Ave N • ti � c Lake 3 t Road ° Lake - e� Cre tir pve N Classen m Spiro' L diard ° Y Ke.11ey.,pry Long Lake na �Z v • Lake m °c + moa .,`+ •�••�. �O 12 Daniels St LL Orcard�Way Moline Road ooO' . o ran40- M 119 Lake 79 N °a 3 'P 19thlAve 8th Ave N Wayzata Bay Ivd E N a ay Lynwood Blvd c Shoreline Ory 1 • • .. .. _ . pt• 1 1 Shoreland Overlay District c _ Lafayette 1 Bay •♦ 4. La District Protected 'y .' �'v ar Boundary Tributaries Legend lQ e �• e •�.•' �.• Lakeshore Included , � •. Setback Floodplain ^,. City Limits Lakes & Ponds -..� • 0 Spri% 1 Park Carman s .• Overlay Bay 1 Bay •' �. ��Aa^�- Streams 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams a' ®. .• p/ nn Q� a+ � N s• R• r rri r r da 12 CY9 �� v rn m 1 Stubbs N • oa d ° Bay i Pal 1 r � _ Fox St W Branch Road V 0PIV- Ln 'County Road 151 North Browns F' Arm Tanag Bay j Maxwell ake Bay • French 1 Sunnyfield Road E Forest Z Marsh o Lake D 1 c Z z c Jennings 1 Bay m E0: 1 ' N Shore Or o� Bracketts Game Farm R°ad �• �r g yth T Point 0 o ,•' West Dutch a 1 Ann �•'w••�• Crystal Bohns •' �. Lake Bav Pn nt : •. Lake Harrison .. _ 1 . • . .� - I n 19thlAve 8th Ave N Wayzata Bay Ivd E N a ay Lynwood Blvd c Shoreline Ory 1 • • .. .. _ . pt• 1 1 Shoreland Overlay District c _ Lafayette 1 Bay •♦ 4. La District Protected 'y .' �'v ar Boundary Tributaries Legend lQ e �• e •�.•' �.• Lakeshore Included , � •. Setback Floodplain ^,. City Limits Lakes & Ponds -..� • a Spri% 1 Park Carman s .• Overlay Bay 1 Bay •' �. ��Aa^�- Streams 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams a' ®. .• p/ 0 3,500 O� Feet ew . �• Ca • 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Po. Hennepin County, MnDOT �• • — • • — • • — epts Figure 3A-6 Nig Z c J CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3B. GENERAL LAND USE PLAN Page Introduction 313-2 Scope 3B-2 Basic Land Use Concepts and Principles 313-3 Table 313-1: Orono Population and Households 1970-2040 313-4 Table 313-1a: Orono Populations and HH adjusted 313-5 Land Use Goals and Policies 313-6 The Land Use Plan 313-12 Figure 313-1 Generalized Land Use 313-13 Table 313-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary 313-15 Table 313-3: Orono 2040 Planned Land Use 313-15 Table 313-4: Planned Development Sites 313-23 Table 313-5: Net Density 3B-24 Employment 313-24 Figure 313-2 Employment 313-24 Figure 313-3 Employment by Industry 311-25 Historic Site Preservation Plan 313-25 Appendix I Maps Map 3B-1 Map 3B-2 Map 3B -2B Map 3B-3 Map 3B -3B Map 3B-4 Appendix II Navarre Area Plan Urban and Rural Areas Existing Land Use Existing Land Use -Navarre Area Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Planned Development Areas City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 1 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan CMP PART 3B LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION This Land Use Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practices of Orono citizens. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues the basic land use concepts developed by Orono Township in 1950 and it conforms to the goals established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: L The Land Use Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials, City staff, and other parties involved in land development and growth management in Orono. Orono's land use plan indicates the basic location, density and types of land uses in the City that are considered to be compatible with environmental conditions and beneficial to the long term health, safety and welfare of the City and its citizens alike. Z The Land Use Plan is intended to be a guide for future development so as to reinforce our environmental protection commitment and to ensure such development will be consistent with existing land use. This Plan is compatible with the plans of nearby cities for land use of abutting neighborhoods and for overall levels of services and facilities. 3. The Land Use Plan is intended to advise the Metropolitan Council and our municipal neighbors of Orono's planning and growth management programs. The Land Use Plan illustrates and coordinates the various goals and policies of all the elements of the Community Management Plan. 4, The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a basis for public facilities planning. The Land Use Plan plays an important role in determining each neighborhood's ultimate population, the required capacity of public facilities, and an appropriate capital improvements program. 5. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as the basis for developing responsible ordinances for land use management. Zoning and subdivision controls have been established and will continue to be refined to implement the intent of this Land Use Plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 2 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan MOM The time framework of the Land Use Plan is intended to be consistent with the regional planning period of 2020 through 2040 and with the City's permanent planning policy for rural Orono. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan and no expansion of the existing urban service area. This commitment is particularly important to the many Orono citizens who are making private investments based upon this concept. BASIC LAND USE CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES Orono's planning programs have long recognized the development paradox, or urbanization spiral, which often results from arbitrary planning assumptions or from incomplete analysis of planning alternatives. The most striking example in Orono's situation is the documented evidence that over- extension of sanitary sewers, ostensibly to solve a pollution problem, can easily in itself cause irretrievable water quality degradation of Lake Minnetonka. Chapter 1 of this Plan outlines the "urbanization spiral". Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds, alum treatments, and a wide variety of Best Management Practices provide added tools to manage runoff from rural densities. However, Orono cannot and will not rely solely on man- made systems for preserving water quality, and will not increase density to pay for stormwater management infrastructure. A principal goal of Orono's planning program is the protection of natural resources and environmental amenities, particularly the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake Minnetonka. Retention of natural vegetation, light, air, and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion and alteration. Water quality preservation is dependent upon effective sewage treatment programs. Urbanized areas, shoreland areas and remaining existing higher -density housing clusters within the Rural area have been or will be provided with municipal sanitary sewer to prevent discharge of untreated or insufficiently treated sewage effluent into the Lake. In the rural areas, low density land use can be safely served long- term by individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. These two development patterns offer a variety of housing to meet residents' lifestyle and service desires. The citizens of Orono have determined that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, and with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area. Orono is partly in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and partly outside the current MUSA. The MUSA was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. Orono does not anticipate expansion of the MUSA boundary as part of the 2040 update. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 3 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan Urban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require, and to financially support, municipal sewer and water services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreational facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas have limited density and have environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have new residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the Community Management Plan. Additional of higher density housing is anticipated in the planning term to accommodate a wider range of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively low. The rural area is expected to have continued infill residential development. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and development objectives of Orono. Community leaders have consistently held firm to the quality over quantity in approving development proposals, and will continue to do so. Those close in proximity to Core metro area, the projected population is a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Table 3B-1 illustrates Orono Populations and Households growth, from 1970, projected through 2040. The most recent data supplied by the Met Council, in 2016, shows 7,691 people in 3,037 households. Table 3B-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Severed and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered 4,429 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered 3,008 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered - - 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Personslj 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Table 3B -la illustrates the number of households need to be created based on the 2016 updated numbers. In summary, the city will need to add 202 sewered households to meet 2030 projections, and 532 households to meet 2040 projections. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 4 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on Highway 12 through Orono and Long Lake. Environmental and social pressures have eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 15 along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans were revised three decades ago in response to Orono's plans for low-density development. The final Orono -Long Lake Interceptor is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent with Orono's goals for the rural area. Orono's commercial and economic development has always been centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been met by commercial facilities and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. New urban housing will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family, attached townhome, and apartment dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels along Wayzata Boulevard and in the Navarre Area. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry -buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required by urban and rural neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 5 Table 3B -la: Orono Households 2010 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered adjusted Forecasts) Household Change Change 2040 Change Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. from 2030 Est. from Est from 2016 2016 2016 Sewered 1780 2253 2105 -148 2,455 202 2,785 532 Unsewered 1046784 1095 311 1105 321 1,115 331 Total City 29146 3037 39200 163 3,560 523 3,900 L863 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on Highway 12 through Orono and Long Lake. Environmental and social pressures have eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 15 along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans were revised three decades ago in response to Orono's plans for low-density development. The final Orono -Long Lake Interceptor is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent with Orono's goals for the rural area. Orono's commercial and economic development has always been centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been met by commercial facilities and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. New urban housing will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family, attached townhome, and apartment dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels along Wayzata Boulevard and in the Navarre Area. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry -buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required by urban and rural neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 5 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan Orono's transportation plan is tailored to the different needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. Near the lakeshore and in some rural areas, the collector roads are relatively slow speed with circuitous alignment dictated by the hills and bays rather than by commuter preference. The urban areas are provided with a typical network of city streets connecting residential and shopping areas with each other. The rural area is gridded-off with a core system of publicly maintained collector and minor arterial streets running at regular intervals. Orono's parks and open space facilities reflect different urban and rural characteristics. In the urban area, the City provides numerous small neighborhood parks and playgrounds offering centers for neighborhood activities such as swimming, skating, softball and soccer. In addition, three larger preserves (Casco Circle, Saga Hill and Highwood) offer substantial "natural" areas. In the rural area, a variety of City -owned parks and preserves offer a range of active and passive recreation opportunities. Large public and quasi -public recreational facilities include Three Rivers Park District lands, several golf courses, a gun club, Minnesota DNR's Luce Line Trail, the new Dakota Rail Trail, as well as two 'big woods' Scientific and Natural Areas. LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Land Use Plan is based upon the following goals and policies which in turn have been actively developed and fostered by Orono residents over the last 45 years. Land Use Goals 1. To reinforce Orono's environmental protection commitment, with special emphasis on the protection of Lake Minnetonka and Orono's other lakes. 2. To maintain the historic identity and character of the separate urban and rural neighborhoods. 3. To provide appropriate places for a variety of local residential, educational, recreational, industrial and neighborhood commercial activities. 4. To protect neighborhoods from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 5. To coordinate Orono's land uses with that of neighboring communities. 6. To coordinate land uses and developed density with the financial and physical capabilities of the City. General Land Use Policies 1. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural Areas is fixed. Orono's Urban Area will not be strictly defined by the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary or future expansions of the MUSA boundary but will be fixed by this and the other elements of the Community Management Plan. Orono's defined Urban and Rural Areas are best described by the planned development types and densities. Areas where the zoned density allows no more than 1 unit per 2 acres is deemed Rural; areas where the zoned density allows more than I unit per 2 acres is deemed Urban, Orono's Urban and Rural areas are depicted and fixed by Map City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 6 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan 3B-1. 2. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) will define the areas of Orono where municipal sewers may be extended. The MUSA will include all parts of Orono's Urban Area and may include parts of Orono's Rural Area where appropriate. The MUSA boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not strictly define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 3. Orono's land use plans will be based upon environmental protection policies. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. 4. Development density will be limited throughout the city to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. Urbanization increases the rate and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. To the extent that it is practical and feasible, the City will supplement existing natural assimilation capacities with man- made ponding areas, but will not allow increases in development density beyond the defined density as a result of such supplementation. 5. The wetlands, floodplains, and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as an economically practical and effective method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. The city will not support the filling of a wetland to provide a buildable lot. 6. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with Orono's Shoreland Management regulations, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. 7. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to limit surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. Where determined to be feasible and practical, alternative natural methods of shoreline protection other than rip -rap will be promoted. Excavation, filling and other grade changes at or near the shoreline for the sole purpose of accommodating development will be discouraged. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 7 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan 8. The City will work to encourage and facilitate slope stabilization measures prior to slope failures. 9. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. The City will observe and administer Flood Plain regulations as required by the DNR. 10. Orono's land use plan will promote the preservation of open space, light and air. Sufficient open spaces will be provided in each neighborhood and on each lot to prevent overcrowding and to ensure adequate light, air and recreation for all residents. 11. Private ownership, maintenance and stewardship of the land, including open space and many types of improvements, is favored over public ownership as being in the best and most beneficial interests of the property owner and the public, providing for more intimate, responsive and economical land management. 12. No land owner should be denied the right to develop his land by any staged growth, land banking or no -growth policy, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. 13. Future development must enhance the community. Land development should respect preserve the value of the land and the integrity, stability and beauty of the community. 14. Physical improvements required to accommodate new development must be provided by the developer. It is the policy of the City that development pays for itself, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to development In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configurations, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. All physical improvements must conform to city standards. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform, City -established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. Developers must dedicate lands required for public use. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, trails, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. If the individual development's property is not conducive to public land dedication, then in lieu of lands the developer may be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase of such lands or the improvement of such facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase from multiple small developments. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 8 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan 17. No land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Urban Land Use Policies 1. The majority of Orono's urban area will be reserved for residential land use. Many urban residences will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive environmental conditions. Medium and High Density multi- family residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation services, but will not be appropriate within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka except when in close proximity to the Navarre commercial area abutting CR 15 or CR 19. 2. Commercial areas will be provided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercial areas will be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature (i.e. "big box" retail) which would increase traffic, particularly on collector streets serving low density residential development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial Development is targeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas will be provided for public access and limited lake -user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishing supplies, boat service and boat repair facilities which are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. 4. The City will encourage private unification and coordination of the existing commercial areas. Unplanned strip commercial developments will be discouraged. Coordinated projects designed to aesthetically enhance, unify and identify the business areas will be encouraged. 5. Future industrial development will be limited to the area of the existing Orono industrial park. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is consistent with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. 6. Commercial and industrial development will not be permitted to adversely affect City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 9 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan neighboring residential property. The location, scale and types of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach upon or adversely impact the primary residential land uses in Orono. Wherever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. Public urban services must be available for all future commercial, industrial and urban - residential development. Commercial, industrial and urban -density residential uses will be permitted only where municipal sanitary sewer, water, adequate transportation, police and fire protection services are available. 8. Urban development will utilize the capacity of existing public facilities. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. 9. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City regulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 10. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Rural Land Use Policies Orono's rural area will be reserved for permanent low-density residential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs. marshland assimilative capacity precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low- density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. Orono's rural area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses, orchards, small hobby farms, riding stables, and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. Rural density is limited by natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, factors which influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 10 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. The existing rural area will not be urbanized. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. Rural development will be subject to proven on-site sewage treatment capability. Future development in the rural area will be contingent upon the developer providing prior technical evidence that the site contains sufficient suitable land for all development, an acceptable primary drainfield area, and reserved space for at least one alternate drainfield area. The zoning area requirements for rural Orono will therefore be based upon minimum areas of dry, buildable, contiguous land exclusive of roadways, wetlands, streams or areas of high water table. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate homesites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our wildlife. Public open space will be provided on a large-scale or Park Reserve basis, but neighborhood or mini -parks are unnecessary because of the large amount of available privately owned and maintained open space. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shoreland and within the MUSA will be provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Municipal sewer service connections will be available to new or existing residences within the designated Shoreland Overlay District and within the MUSA when requested, costs to connect will be the responsibility of the property owner. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Lakeshore Residential Land Use Policies Although Orono's lakeshore has a wide range of diversity in lot size and home size, the predominant character of Orono's lakeshore is natural. Natural is defined in part by much of the lakeshore being historically developed as large estate lots with homes set back a substantial distance from the lakeshore, or being developed as moderate homes on moderate lots leaving substantial open space. Natural includes remnants of native forests and vegetation, protection of the lakeshore from hardcover and impervious surface encroachments. The exception to the natural lakeshore is the areas where historically small cottages were built on small lots close to the lakeshore. These cottages in many cases have been updated, remodeled or expanded into year- round homes. The key goal of the City's Comprehensive Plan is to protect Lake Minnetonka, and other Orono lakes and waterways which includes the preservation of the natural character of the lakeshore and the water quality of the lakes. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 11 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan As the demand for, and value of, lakeshore property has dramatically increased, so has the pressure to expand or replace older homes with much larger homes. This pressure has the potential to substantially alter the natural character of the lakeshore, and the more open and natural environment enjoyed by property owners along much of the lakeshore in Orono. The following policies will guide the City in addressing development on the lakeshore. 1. Lake Minnetonka shall be protected as a natural and recreational resource. 2. The natural character of the lakeshore shall be preserved, and when possible, enhanced. 3. The views and open space currently enjoyed by lakeshore property owners shall be protected. 4. The size of a house to be allowed on a lot shall be determined, in part, based on the size of the lot, as well as on the shape and topography of the lot. 5. The increase in massing of structures on the lakeshore shall be limited. THE LAND USE PLAN In 2016, the Met Council published a generalized land use map illustrating the majority of Orono Land as either single family detached, undeveloped, or water. This is illustrated in the Figure 3B-1 below. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 12 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan 2016 Generalized Land Use City of Orono, Hennepin County Medina Spring / Park Mound _1 i Shorewood Minnetonka Beach Tonka J Bay I 2 3 4 Woodland Deephaven -I Miles 2016 Generalized Land Use Farmstead - Mixed Use Residential - Major Highway SeasonalNacation - Mixed Use Industrial - Railway Single Family Detached - Mixed Use Commercial and Other - Airport Manufactured Housing Park Industrial and Utility Agricultural Single Family Attached - Extractive Undeveloped Multifamily - Institutional Vater _ Retail and Other Commercial - Park, Recreational or Preserve _ Office - Golf Course L --- J County Boundaries 1 City and Township Boundaries - NCompass Street Centerlines Figure: 313-1 Generalized Land Use City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 13 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2015 adopted "Thrive MSP 2040" to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. Forecasts indicate the metro area will grow by 820,000 people between 2010 and 2040, and as the average household size continues to shrink (from 2.55 in 2010 to 2.43 by 2040) an additional 389,000 households must be accommodated. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a "one size fits all" approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. In general, Orono's area within the MUSA boundary is designated as "Emerging Suburban Edge" and the areas outside the MUSA boundary are "Rural Residential". Metropolitan Council has identified a set of implementation strategies for each of these categories, as well as an umbrella of strategies that will apply to all communities. Map 3C-1 outlines the Community Designations and the community responsibilities. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2021-2030. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7 -county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element is a housing implementation program, "...including official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing." Orono's share is forecasted at 154 new affordable housing units for the decade 2021- 2030. EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE SUMMARY Map 3B-2 depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2016. As shown in Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary, just over 1/3 of Orono's total area is in open water; of the 2/3 that is land area, 92% is devoted to residential, parks & open space uses, or undeveloped. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 14 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan Table 313-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary Land Use Category Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 301.79 1.96% Rural Residential 5469.34 35.59% Island Residential 75.99 0.49% Urban Low Density Residential 2440.78 15.88% Urban Medium Density Residential 28.40 0.18% Urban Med-High/ Mixed Use Density Residential 0.00 0.00% Urban High Density Residential 20.57 0.13% Commercial/ Office 85.75 0.56% Industrial 34.79 0.23% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1529.49 9.95% Lake and Open Water 5245.44 34.13% Major Highway and Railway TOTAL I r 136.77 1 15,356 0.89% 100% Source: Existing Land Use Map Map 3B-3 indicates the proposed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use map will form the basis for land use zoning decisions over the next 20 years. Table 3B-3 is a summary of Orono's Planned Land Use. Note that the Summary reflects that the planned uses are to be allowed to take effect immediately rather than being staged over a period of years. Table 313-3: Orono Planned Land Use Summary Land Use Category Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 1207.64 8.29% Rural Residential 2794.54 19.17% Island Residential 55.37 0.38% Urban Low Density Residential 2761.88 18.95% Urban Medium Density Residential 599.20 4.11% Urban Med-High/ Mixed Use Density Residential 76.80 0.53% Urban High Density Residential 40.46 0.28% Commercial/ Office 46.06 0.32% Industrial 41.67 0.29% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1569.78 10.77% Lake and Open Water 5245.44 35.99% Major Highway and Railway TOTAL 136.77 15,356 0.94% 100% Source: Proposed Land Use Map City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 15 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan The land uses identified in Map313-3 are outlined in greater detail below. Lakes and Open Water Areas within the city boundary of open water. The Lakes and associated watersheds are a significant influence on the quality of life and character of the City. 2. Rural Preserve (1 units per 5 acres) The northwest corner of the City is planned for a lower density of one unit per five acres. This area has been developed to provide large lot and quasi agricultural home sites. The extension of municipal water or sewer is not intended for these areas. Rural Residential (1 unit per 2 acres) This is the typical rural residential density developed and planned to be permanently self-supporting. No rural density will be allowed greater than one unit per two acres except for those residences in existing rural housing clusters that were originally developed many decades ago and in most cases have been provided with municipal sewer within the past 3 decades. New rural developments may include housing clustering when environmental and site conditions allow, provided the overall density within the development conforms to these requirements, and provided that all sewage treatment needs can be adequately met within. 4. Urban Low Residential (.5-2 units per acre) This is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of lots developed many decades ago smaller than 1 acre, and have access to sanitary sewer services. These lots have a particular impact on lake water quality, and lake character and storm water management, massing, and hardcover controls are critical to the retention of this character. Urban Medium Residential (3-10 units per acre) This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely situated that residential development at the prescribed density will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. 6. Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. The Mixed Use Residential and Commercial designation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residential. This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near -by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi -family residential development such as senior and assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher -density City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 16 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan residential use or mixed residential -commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects. The City anticipates mixed use within the context of the neighborhood, and not necessarily specific to a particular parcel. 7. Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. 8. Island Residential (1 unit per 5 acres) The Island residential is characterized by limited access, utilities, and municipal services for properties originally developed as seasonal cabins. The Land use category is intended to preserve this land use without encouraging additional subdivision. 9. Commercial/ Office Commercial/ Office is the general land use describing 3 sub land use categories: Navarre Commercial District, Long Lake Business District, and Lakeshore Commercial. Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL Lakeshore Commercial is restricted to Lake access and lake user service businesses are appropriate for a lakeside community and require a lakeshore location, including marinas. Special performance standards are necessary to assure protection of the lake environment. Parking, utilities, lake and Highway access, and pedestrian circulation must be considered in siting new Lake Shore Commercial Uses. NAVARRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be Navarre. This area will provide opportunity for neighborhood retail and service businesses, plus professional offices. Accessory functions such as offices and owner -occupied living units or limited multi -family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian -friendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in Navarre to allow for an expanded range of neighborhood services and local small business opportunities. The Navarre Commercial District extends along either side of Shoreline Drive from the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 westward to the Orono -Spring Park border, and along both sides of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue to Lydiard Avenue. The commercial uses along these intersecting corridors are typically only one tier deep, with virtually all commercial properties abutting either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Additionally, the commercial properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among them, making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential; hence the business uses in many cases are in close proximity to individual homes. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 17 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identified a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to come: 1. High traffic volumes and the existing traffic management infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestrians have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cross CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2. Parking availability is a limiting factor for expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3. Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as financial constraints. 4. Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local businesses to survive and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5. There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. Navarre hasn't decided whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the street, parking in the rear) or suburban (buildings set back, parking at the front) in character. 6. Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighborhood can become an issue. 7. Expansion of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8. Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. Orono/Lon2 Lake Commercial Area An additional commercial area is designated along Wayzata Boulevard where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than "big box" regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally -owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 18 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan retail area will be a pedestrian -friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. Parameters for commercial use of this area are as follows: 1. The area affected is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, west of Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. Allowed uses in this area include professional offices, limited service uses, retail uses accessory to the office use, and senior and assisted living uses. 3. Access to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway. Direct access to Willow Drive, if allowed, shall be right-in/right-out only. There shall be no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. 4. "Big box" retail uses will not be allowed within this area. 9. Park/ Recreation/ Open Space Park, Recreation, and Open Space Land Use includes public and private parks and natural areas throughout the community. The recreational facilities identified on the Land Use Plan are principally large natural or open space areas which are compatible with their Rural Area location. 10. Industrial This district provides space for industrial activities for companies that are able and willing to achieve superior standards of design and environmental protection. Industrial land uses should be restricted to areas abutting major transportation corridors and individually cited so as to minimum negative impacts on residential areas. Based on their heavy hardcover needs, industrial areas should be located further than 1,000 feet from lakes. 11. Major Highway and Railway Uses Identifies land occupied by federal or state highways and railway improvements. Note. The City does not intend to establish a staged growth plan, limiting a property from the use of their land, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. Future Development The City anticipates its growth to occur in the same manner has been employed over the last three decades. The majority of subdivision based growth will occur via the splitting of larger lots into subdivisions of less than 6 new building sites. Small areas of the community are conducive to higher density. These projects have served to accommodate our aging community, and provide additional housing and neighborhood options not prevalent in Orono. The City's new residential growth within the MUSA area is expected in one of 6 primary areas, depicted on Map 3B-4 Planned Development areas, and summarized in Table 3134, Planned Development Sites. The table predicts growth over the next 2 decades and identifies the MUSA part and the Traffic Analysis Zone impacted. Assuming development at the minimum range, the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 19 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan city will meet its household growth projection for 2030 and 2040. The city also maintains opportunity for property owners to provide housing to meet affordability goals. The Net Density for the sewered areas of Orono is included in Table 3134, and is summarized for clarity on Table 313-5. The planned minimum density of new sewer connections is 3.16 units per acre over the next 20 years. NA VARRE AREA PLAN In 2018, the City completed the Navarre Area Plan (NAP) with the aid of a Planning Consultant, WSB and Associates. This planning process focused on the land range vision and land use goals for the Navarre area, and to inform the Comprehensive Plan, for this update. The proposed land uses shown on Map 3B- 3 include the findings from the Navarre Area Plan. Map 313-3a shows the Navarre area specifically. The Navarre Planning Process employed a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), consisting of 13 members of the Navarre area community, including business owners and operators and residents. The Planning Process included three PAC meetings, an open house in January, and a Joint Work session in April. Public comment was collected via the open house, work session, on-line surveys, and the use of a social media tool, Social Pinpoint. The full report, including the appendices detailing the comments received, and the market study, are attached in Appendix II of this chapter. The NAP evaluated several factors influencing the changes in the Navarre neighborhood over the next 20 years, including the market, traffic and transportation. The goal of the PAC was to influence and guide this change toward a Navarre area that can serve as a pseudo "downtown" of Orono, while still respecting the core Orono values as a small, rural community. A market study was completed by Maxfield and Associates, tested the land use assumptions made by the land use plan. The market study was used to adjust the planned land use map from the 2030 to the 2040 Plan. Traffic and transportation issues are a major influence on the character and change in Navarre. In 2019, Hennepin County is expected to improve the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 (Shoreline and Shadywood Road), though these improvements are not expected to increase capacity. Capacity challenges of this section of the community are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The findings of the Navarre area Plan are highlighted below. Interaction with Lake Minnetonka As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 20 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan Future Development ■ Cautiously consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development. ■ Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas. ■ Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, facade articulation, and entryways. ■ Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw. ■ Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking. ■ Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses. ■ Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles. ■ Consider developing a fagade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements ■ Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. ■ Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features. ■ Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. ■ Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 21 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan Shadywood Trail Connection ■ Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward. ■ Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required. ■ Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events ■ Encourage the development of a community festival. ■ Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail. ■ Utilize the city -owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event. ■ Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival. ■ Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre. ■ Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers' market to organize a farmers' market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre. ■ Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Tear Downs ■ Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures. ■ Proactively address blighted properties through the City's code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City's code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. ■ Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 22 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 23 Land Use (Planned Dev. Areas) PID Status: Vacant, Agriculture, Developed Table 313- Acres Net Gross Residentia Resid. 1 Acres 4 Planned Develo ment Sites Guided Guided #of units Density Density (Target, based Range Range (L -w) (Hlgb) on low density) Net Res. Density (Units per acre) within MUS A 2020-2030 Growth 2030-2040 Growth MUSA Part TAZ Zone Area A 921 inge3211823140001, Vsu--E� 321182314002 Vacant 289 3.7 3 10 11.1 29 L 921 3311823230002 Agriculture 52.9 1 23.52 8 1 20 188.16 50 138 XXXII 921 Area A Total 81.6 27.22 199.26 7.32 79 138 Area B _ 922 2745 Kelley 3311823120008 Vacant 2.55 2.55 10 20 25.5 26 X 922 2635 Kelley 3311823120009 Vacant 3.5 3.5 10 20 35 35 X 922 St. Thomas Prop 3311823110060 Vacant 3.69 3.69 10 20 36.9 37 X 922 Area BTotal 9.74 9.74 97.4 10 61 _ 37 Area C 929 Hwy 12 frontage 3411823320002 Vacant 1.71 1.71 3 10 5.13 5.13 XXXIV 929 Garden Prop. 3411823320051 Agriculture 3.41 3.41 3 10 10.23 10.23 XXXiV 929 Glendale Drive 3411823320004 Developed 3.82 3.82 3 10 11.46 11.46 XXXN 929 Area CTotal = 8.94 8.94 26.82 3 0 26.82 Area D 923 2060 Wayzata 3411923210040 Vacant 2.51 251 10 20 25.1 25.1 923 Area DTotal 1 2.51 1 2.51 25.1 10 0 25.1 Area E (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) 927, 931, 954,955 690 Brown Rd 3411823120007 Developed 26.9 23.8 0.5 11.9 11.9 XL 927 740 Brown Rd 3411823120002 Developed 3.18 3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 XL 927 3400 Fox 511723430005 Developed 7.36 5.26 0.5 1 2.63 2.63 XXXI 954 3295 Fox 511723440006 Vacant 4.23 4.23 0.5 2.115 2.115 XXXI 931 3345 Fox 511723440007 Vacant 4.64 1 4.69 0.5 2.345 2.345 XXXI 931 3350 Fox 511723440008 Developed 7.12 7.12 0.5 3.56 3.56 XXXI 954 3320 Fox 511723440009 Developed 3.06 3.06 0.5 1.53 1.53 XXXI 954 3300 Fox 511723440003 Developed 4.55 4.55 0.5 2.275 2.275 XXXI 954 3280 Fox 511723440011 Vacant 4.95 4.95 0.5 2.475 2.475 XXXI 954 3250 Fox 511723440012 Developed 5.31 5.31 0.5 2.655 2.655 XXXI 954 3200 Fox 511723440013 Vacant 4.12 4.12 0.5 2.06 2.06 XXXI 954 3175 Fox 411723330010 Developed 1 7.49 7.49 0.5 3.745 3.745 XXXI 954 3125 Fox 411723330011 Developed 7.44 7.44 0.5 3.72 3.72 XXXI 954 825 Old Crys taIB 911723210001 Developed 21.23 17.61 0.5 8.805 8.805 XXXI 954 1700 Shorel ine 1011723140022 Developed 20.14 20.14 0.5 10.07 10.07 XXXXVH 955 1100 Mil lston Rd 1011723140020 Developed 12.7 1 12.7 0.5 6.35 6.35 XXXXVII 955 Area ETotal 144.47 135.65 1 67.825 0.5 13.49 54.335 Area F 956,958 3880 Shoreline (Hennepin Count 1711723330151 Developed 9.37 9.37 10 93.7 93.7 I 958 3890 Shoreline 1711723330004 Developed 0.68 0.68 10 6.8 6.8 1 958 3860 Shoreline 1711723330005 Developed 0.64 0.64 10 6.4 6.4 1 958 3850 Shoreline 1711723330006 Developed 0.78 0.78 10 7.8 7.8 1 958 3800 Shoreline 1711723330007 Developed 0.7 0.7 10 7 7 1 958 3596 Shoreline 1711723430107 Developed 0.62 0.62 10 6.2 6.2 1 958 2389 Blaine 1711723340012 Developed 1.11 1.11 10 11.1 11.1 1 958 3574 Shoreline 1711723430149 Developed 0.47 0.47 10 4.7 4.7 1 958 3572 Shoreline 1711723430151 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3542 Shoreline 1711723430113 Developed 0.46 1 0.46 10 1 4.6 4.6 1 958 3502 Shoreline 1711723430114 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3496 Shoreline 1711723430155 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3480 Shoreline 1711723430093 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 3472 Shoreline 1711723430094 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 3468 Shoreline 1711723430095 Developed 0,15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 3465 Lyric 1711723430086 Developed 0,62 0.62 10 6.2 6.2 I 958 3440 Shoreline 1711723430142 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 For£iet Land 1711723430085 Vacant 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 Forliiet Land 1711723430084 Vacant 0.1 0.1 10 1 1 I 958 Parking Lot 1711723430083 Developed 0.86 0.86 10 8.6 8.6 I 958 2520 Shadywood 2011723110038 Vacant 2.63 2.02 10 20.2 1 20.2 1 956 3770 Shoreline (Firestation) 1711723340086 Developed 4.33 4 10 40 40 1 958 Area FTotal 25.05 1 24. 11 1 1 241.1 10.00 602 IM9 272.31 1 208.17 1 0 1 657.505 1 3.15850 213.69 462.155 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 23 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan EMPLOYMENT Employment levels in the City have grown slowly, and are expected to remain static over the next two decades. 2000 1800 1600 iElR ] 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Employment 1970 - 2040 19'0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2030 2040 Figure 313-2 Employment Education services are highest employer by industry at 32% of all jobs in Orono. Retail trade is the third highest employer at 15% of jobs. The City anticipates employment growth to occur as existing businesses evolve and grow. With the exception of new commercial areas along the west side of Shadywood, the City does not anticipate the expansion of commercial areas in the city. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 24 Table 313-5 Net Density Net Res. Land Use Acres Net Guided # of units Density (Units (Planned Dev. Category Gross Residential Density (Target, based on per acre) Areas) Resid. Acres Range (Low) low density) within MUSA Area A Med, High 81.6 27.22 3,10 199.26 7.32 Area B High 9.74 9.74 10 97.4 10 Area C Medium 8.94 8.94 3 26.82 3 Area D High 2.51 2.51 10 25.1 10 Area E Low 144.47 135.65 0.5 68 0.50 High, Mixed Area F 25.05 24.11 10 241.1 10.00 Use 272.31 208.17 657.68 7 3.16 EMPLOYMENT Employment levels in the City have grown slowly, and are expected to remain static over the next two decades. 2000 1800 1600 iElR ] 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Employment 1970 - 2040 19'0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2030 2040 Figure 313-2 Employment Education services are highest employer by industry at 32% of all jobs in Orono. Retail trade is the third highest employer at 15% of jobs. The City anticipates employment growth to occur as existing businesses evolve and grow. With the exception of new commercial areas along the west side of Shadywood, the City does not anticipate the expansion of commercial areas in the city. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 24 CMP Part 313. General Lane Use Plan (Employment by Industry in Orono Real Estate and Rental and Leasing, Professional and Technical Services, &%— Retail Trade. All Dther Industries, Gare and Social Assistance, 5% }ublic Administration. 4% .-FFnance and Insurance. 4% Other Services, Ex. Public Admin.. 4% struction, 3% nufacturing, 2% ,nnistrative and Waste Services, 1% Services, 32% 11 Source, Quarterly Census of Employment: and Wages, Minresota Department of Employment and Economic Development, 2nd quarter data: Metropolitan Cc�urc =_calf have estimated some data points. Figure 313-3 Employment by Industry HISTORIC SITE PRESER VA TION PLAN Orono began to develop in the mid 19th Century, and many of the vestiges of early development are still present, in the form of standing buildings and structures, foundations, fence lines, roadway corridors, place names and other more subtle reminders of the past. Additionally, due to Orono's unique location on the shores of Lake Minnetonka, prehistoric native burial mound sites are known to have existed in various locations throughout the City. Orono has long encouraged the preservation of historic sites and structures, but has never adopted a formal preservation plan. Because no formal plan has been in place, many historic properties have been lost or significantly changed as development and redevelopment progressed. The subdividing of many of the old lakeshore estate properties has typically left a stately mansion surrounded by modern high-end homes rather than formal grounds. The City is fortunate that the West Hennepin Pioneer's Association Museum is located in neighboring Long Lake, with its members serving as an invaluable resource for helping to preserve the past. Historic Preservation Policies 1. In order to ensure that Orono's heritage is preserved, the City will consider development of a Historic Preservation Plan. The intent of such a plan would be to establish goals, policies and local regulations resulting in preservation of historic sites, buildings, place names, corridors, etc. 2. Orono will work with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in determining whether properties proposed for development contain historically significant resources which should be preserved. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 25 CMP Part 3B. General Lane Use Plan APPENDIX Appendix 1 Maps Map 313-1 Urban and Rural Areas Map 3B-2 Existing Land Use Map 3B -2B Existing Land Use -Navarre Area Map 313-3 Proposed Land Use Map 313-3B Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Map 3B-4 Planned Development Areas Appendix II Navarre Area Plan and appendices. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 26 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M co Turner Road o ` a: I.. Drake Dr o U Green Q 1 �_-- Painter' W Branch Road Id Road E �a O w �a m Game Far Dutch Lake Legend 0 Defined Urban and Rural Areas April 2018 BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Moline Road a u�`\e�� ae pp p'��j Orchard�Ln Wayzata♦ Ohy< Grand Aver ���. oh 1 _•.r: City Limits ++t 2040 MUSA 0 Rive lgggeams Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT �o w f � , e , p.� � <ake�` . 7g N.. 1 1 \� N 1, •:� . `''• _.. _.. _. _ a� ° cn \ de c `E �s 6�4oay ��, a .. ' 12 Park S � R 1 Rice 1 Siubbs rn Lake St E 1 O Fox St R \� 1 d�y�evr Ln y Road 151 � Wayzata C l o Bay Lake D 1 Jenning I Bay 1 N Shore Dr'oi ,c Harrison Bay N Ivd E Z c J Katrina ( Y_'% 12 '�' A Moon 1„_._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._Z._.._.._.s�q„_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._,' '<eTroy`s 19t Ave 1 o Il 3 eN � 2 • 1 ° Z � oad 1 • . N o c Spring�\� Z: 1 1 c Poe 3 �” Z' 01 •- o Kelley Pk•N`J_- _ ° K. Minnetonkae� oa o 1 Daniels St ' t 1•'• a 1 8th Ave N �.D. Moline Road a u�`\e�� ae pp p'��j Orchard�Ln Wayzata♦ Ohy< Grand Aver ���. oh 1 _•.r: City Limits ++t 2040 MUSA 0 Rive lgggeams Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT �o w f � , e , p.� � <ake�` . 7g N.. 1 1 \� N 1, •:� . `''• _.. _.. _. _ a� ° cn \ de c `E �s 6�4oay ��, a .. ' 12 Park S � R 1 Rice 1 Siubbs rn Lake St E 1 O Fox St R \� 1 d�y�evr Ln y Road 151 � Wayzata C l o Bay Lake D 1 Jenning I Bay 1 N Shore Dr'oi ,c Harrison Bay N Ivd E Z c J Ann • �” '♦• `• I Minnetonkae� En C3 •.. .. _.. _. Ot • 1 O S d L Highland Ave w S 5J 1 Lafayette .� tRutledge Road �w o- p m �s Bay ♦' 1 La �: , a Day PI' �' �'y9` �� lQar Urban and Rural Areas �.•'•• ♦.•♦♦. Defined Rural Recreational a S P rinc;l �'•�♦• ♦�.♦. •.�. Areas Trail \J Park Bay A °� 0o ►♦•' ♦�♦ a^dpi Defined Urban Railroad Right - Areas of -Way '• Ca P°' ' Figure 3A-3 �.._.._.._ / .tsit- Turner Road w Drake Dr 0 U 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN JKatrina 12 t 7-si _.. _ �wr d�nter C� � o � .aG Moline Road to W CL � r 19N r r � ��dys�de r �Oaa 1 Lake Classen z v to 0 m m a .n s 0 U) Stubbs �µoad a Bay Painter W Branch Road 1 a Road Dutch Lake Legend City Limits Road 151' L e Forest Lake North Arm Y 6t1i o hq� E o r QN, Lake 7 Inset 1 12 U � 1 �• o i Watertown Road Y) 0 0 m T R m 2 a �o Long m "� • Lake it • t, y.l Orchardq t WayyZ4 N� OI n Aver:'�a_ 12 Existing Land UseBOLTN � & E N K April 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. L ._. Z 0 �� ,,°1 I _ Residential (20 i I T m tq - 25 units / acre) zl i 0 U m. 0Kelley Pkwy �1 Office Island Residential Industrial Inset 1 3rd,Ave N U aaaJJJ o 0 - Fox St , eg d VJ Ln � 1 as Laky rv�e netonk, Browns I enc Tanager Bay i Maxwell Lake Bay i" French i Inset 2 Marsh I � Jenning's I /, OI Bay � i • 1•• ♦ y�° Smith Bracketts • Point � " I F Nest ♦• ' Crystal Bohns ••�.• (y Bay Pnint�•♦ 1 Harrison .. — �.♦ • �' Bay 1 4f'• iline Ur Lafayette Bay Inset 2 �% �.• ,♦'� ♦�. Lakes & Ponds /; •• Carman's 1 Bay '� ♦•• �° Wetlands Rivers & Streams ♦ ,♦ . '•` ♦.' F'/ 0 3,500 ♦ ♦ M. W Feet • • Casco : �0 '0 • • Point y ° Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. �•. _ z si,,,oI Hennepin County, MnDOT ro ,orn pve z 0 ..— ....-.. W . Land Use Classes z 23rd Ave N z 0 0 W 0 0 m� c` Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Urban High Density _ Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Commercial / Office Island Residential Industrial Urban Low Park, Density Residential (0.5 Recreational, - 2 units / acre) and Open Space Urban Medium Density Undeveloped Residential (3 - 10 units / acre) _ Right -of -Way Figure 313-2a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN I I � - �.._.._.._..�.._.._.._.._. ,�♦, Sy01 A I & Togo Road W Arm Road Warren Legend W Arm Dr Ln f Northern per.-•� Del Otero Ave= I I 1 SP rin c Park Bay 1 :_ •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds Wetlands Rivers & Streams 0 1,000 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT N u..i I I� 1 1 !Old County R,R v yl 1 Existing Land Use -Navarre � & E BOLTON K March 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. Wes'WO�OdRlad Arcola Lafayette <q .._.._, a..�.._.._.._.._.._.., Bay r° ay o •• �, m ryd. ca ` _9 ••% O �♦ Land Use Classes 31 0 _ i • Rural Preserve High Density °cA m (1 unit/ 5 acres) Residential (7- r w 20 units / acre) i Rural arman/ t7 Residential 1 _Commercial / ♦ C'' ,p° unit / 2 acres) Office ♦ dd a� / �' Island Industrial �/ �•' Residential ��. Low Density Park, Residential (0.5 Recreational, i'• - 2 units / acre) and Open • Space �. Medium Density �• Residential (2-7 Undeveloped �•• units / acre) •�•� Right -of -Way I • Casco ;" Figure 313-2b Point 0 M G Turner Road c� tr w Drake Dr 3 0 U Vtoad Painter W Branch Road Dutch Lake Legend 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN mllii-. n J sinter C;, G7 Moline Road]o W CL City Limits Katrina Lake . \ #- C31 1 Star .. z o ' sthq� E t' Lake Classen z �a z lob��� T, R � m 0 � T � i m U a "a n O s Lake 19 N } 012. . in Watertown Road_.._}• r U) o °aa N C-0 l m i J m r Stubbs Long " •' • Lake 7 Future Land Use March 2018 r=-�'-' L -Z m 0 o: � � m ad I Spripg��� z I+ Lydiar: M: � ke X01 Kelley m. 01 I LL I #I-- -oia 9�ake,Q Inset 1 3rdA+N o Northern Ave Bay I U Fox St ity Road 151 0 2 t - Browns 0 North y �I. Tanager gay r ��^ Arm Maxwell _ Lake wBay � � French Forest Marsh R Lake Jenninc I O� Bay I•., yc° Smith Bracketts •` Point r Nest ♦•• •' �• c I CrystalBohns �. o ♦ C9 Bay Point •• • . 1 Harrison • • — •.I • • ` • amu„ Bay 1 '� iline Dr `Jd 0s �* _ O g • Lafayette 1 Bay �' 1 Inset 2 �%. _ �. ♦' ♦�. e y Lakes & Ponds / Carman's I• 1 Bay •� A. z 0 0 Wetlands Rivers & Streams ,♦ . •` ♦.• F'/ 0 3,500 •' ♦' Feet Casco ' . • , • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. • . _ Z Hennepin County, MnDOT ' • — • ' — a�t�, ami Lak( netonk, Inset 2 PI BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Dickeys r '1" z 23rd Ave N z 0 0 tr c 3 0 m D Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Urban Medium High Density Residential (10 - 20 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Urban High Island Density Residential (20 Residential - 25 units / acre) ighIan dAv Urban Low Road Density Commercial / Residential (0.5 Office - 2 units / acre) Urban Medium Industrial Density Residential (3 - Park, 10 units /acre) Recreational, and Open Space W R 0 s Figure 313-3a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Future Land Use - Navarre BOLTON March 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. . _. 41* 1 0 h �� 1 'txoVthvie`N Road �i`a9e a �•��— •'—' ' r Westwood00 F Road Arcola Ln rooks Ln c Crescent St 40'.ogo Road °°y 11956j Ln boa �ay &Old County RoaQ Q' Crystal v j Ro a ee dy�om Crystal PI Latay W Arm Road pies W Arm Dr No�hern �� �� a 0. ay��e� ?D.\. Q° S Warren qve �"" c Livingston Ave e,qk .o e Lafayette`3°reg` c 0, Lyric Ave .o de O yCL �g St Del Otero Ave ' � ����' %OA. � ��' _ r .._.._�.� Bay0 0 % • G' o ryrym� ,'., W o a Land Use Classes o ��a �.♦ Rural Preserve Urban Medium �CIO y (1 unit/ 5 acres) High Density SP nn ► 3 a Residential (10 �- l— # Rural - 20 units /acre) I caSoo 9� Carman ,�7 / 41 Residential (1 t Park e i .p° unit / 2 acres) Urban High dd Density ea° �a c a / ��' Island Residential (20 B �oanQ Bay J/ � e* Residential - 25 units / acre) Urban Low o` 1 i0i ii'� Density 3 Commercial / ♦' Residential (0.5 Office Legend e �'� - 2 units /acre) R♦ Urban Medium Industrial _ �'• � "° � City Limits Lakes & Ponds n Density Park, Residential (3 - �'� 10 units / acre) Recreational, Wetlands Rivers &Streams ,• and Open .� � Space 0 1,000 �•. Casco Feet �' • � � Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �., Figure 313-3b Hennepin County, MnDOT♦' Point \ `• • i 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 26 k--- ad pter R° W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E 0 0 m m Game Farm ROad E'y Dutch Lake ii Planned Development Sites BOLTON April 2018 & MEN K Real People. Real Solutions. Cl) co rn Turner Road c \ 0 0 T 22 Oo P°e Drake Dr 3 3 0 o U U 1 teA �G Q 26 k--- ad pter R° W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E 0 0 m m Game Farm ROad E'y Dutch Lake ii Planned Development Sites BOLTON April 2018 & MEN K Real People. Real Solutions. Jenning's 1 Development Areas pal ^ Katri=a.. 12 Lake \ y o Y� r Moon High Density / Mixed Use Sites 22 Oo P°e C - Fire Station Area ..`kp 1 1 Stam E - Navarre Mixed Use Area N Shore Dr •,, .. m 6 110 .. .... .. (� .......,a.. .._ .� .... ... ...........� ....... c Lake Tr ...� . ..... ... , .. .� ..... �y _ '' f 19th J th Av 10 I t � 1 West �•• � Ave J Arm Crystal Bohns •• Bay �.1 •�•.�• d aO Point.- Z `o �2; ~� 6th Ave Z YC •.� �' • � , Bay 1 - Lake , A Lickea Lake c aa �oW z ve N ,c P >line Dr Classen m 3 ° m g P �`r Lydiard z : c c Lafayette p rO� - Bay Long Lake mol - 3 0 ♦ •�' '. °a z `' Lake ' 'c N N Ave Stirr 1 '" ' Y o -O Daniels St � I �' 8th Ave, � . �' Je � �� d R i Orchard,Ln WayZa�d� Cay L4th 3 Moline Road a t w ott,A m � Grand Ave �� . . � � ` °�9 � w � i Ave N � Ro as n j a G = L o Lake ,P 3rd,Ave N Rte: ;19 N 411 in a ,, Od 0-, M. co cyg° —� 12 pa k St d .�T m 1 F Rice SWey2afa Blvd E M Stubbs rn lam— ke w La StF F Hi ghwayl12 E 0 Bay O Fox St o' 0 E 1 as w County Road 151 North Tanager Browt - '� Fe�c Wayzata Bay Arm Bay Maxwell` Bay Lake French i 1 \ Forest Z Marsh J - Lake Jenning's 1 Development Areas pal ^ A - Orchard Area Y i a O� Bay High Density / Mixed Use Sites `iQ ar C - Fire Station Area ..`kp 1 1 D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots E - Navarre Mixed Use Area N Shore Dr •,, yc Smith Bracketts • • Point `s •• ' I t � 1 West �•• � J Arm Crystal Bohns •• Bay �.1 •�•.�• c9 1 Point.- Harrison �, .. •.� �' • � , Bay 1 1 • • 1 >line Dr o"e�0 Lafayette 1 e —.• Bay - I 0 ♦ •�' '. Legend e ''� .•' City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprint ► i Pa Carman's •.� c ► Ba v j • Ade 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams f%° •.� 'apt 0 3,500 Oc ' Feet ew '.,• Ca: ' Poi) 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •�• 'its Hennepin County, MnDOT Figure 3134 Development Areas A - Orchard Area Y i a B - Kelley Pkwy. / Wayzata Blvd. Lak High Density / Mixed Use Sites `iQ ar C - Fire Station Area D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots E - Navarre Mixed Use Area Figure 3134 Introduction......................................................................................................................................2 Overviewof Process.................................................................................................................... 2 PreviousPlanning Studies...........................................................................................................2 Navarre Moratorium / DSU Study — 2006................................................................................. 3 Comprehensive Plan Discussion — 2010.................................................................................. 3 Navarre Community Initiative — 2011........................................................................................ 3 Hennepin County / Community Design Group — Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan 2012......3 City of Orono / Hennepin County — Street Light and Sidewalk Improvements — 2013 .............4 Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota — Navarre Demonstration Project 2014-2015 ...................4 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka....................................................................................................5 LakeInteraction Opportunities.....................................................................................................5 Future Development.............................................................................. 5 Market Study Considerations.......................................................... ................................................ 5 CommercialMarket......................................................... ..... ...`.......................................6 ResidentialMarket................................................................................................. 7 Other Uses Considered ......................................... ...... 7 Transportation Improvements ............................... ..............................................................7 Improvements to County Road Intersection.....:�...................................................................7 ArterialCapacity...........................................................................................................................8 Trail to Businesses Connection ......... .. ...` ...............................................................................9 Shadywood Trail Connection.. Q........................................................................................ 9 CommunityEvents........................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Single -Family Housing.....................................................................................................10 Implementation...............................................................................................................................10 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka..............................................................................................10 FutureDevelopment...................................................................................................................10 Transportation Improvements....................................................................................................11 ShadywoodTrail Connection.....................................................................................................11 CommunityEvents.....................................................................................................................11 TearDowns................................................................................................................................12 LIST OF APPENDICES Market Study Public Engagement Traffic Information Page 1 Navarre Small Area Plan I _ Introduction Overview of Process The Navarre Small Area Plan process began in the Fall of 2017. The Navarre area is generally located at the intersection of County Roads 19 (Shoreline Drive) and 15 (Shadywood Road). The study area (Figure 1) includes the residential area north of Shoreline Drive, south of Crystal Place, west of Bayview Place, east of the city limits, and the commercial areas along Shoreline and Shadywood Road. The Navarre area represents Orono's historic town center. A number of planning initiatives have been done for the area over the last twenty years, however, have not been fully acted on. The intent of this plan is to develop a vision for the area to guide policy and investment decisions. The process began with a consultation with the City Council on Monday, September 11, 2017, to discuss the issues that would be evaluated as part of the plan, including: • Explore expanding the Navarre neighborhood to touch and interact with Lake Minnetonka • Develop strategies that can build on the success of the Dakota Rail Trail. • Encourage trail users to be customers of the Navarre businesses. • Examine and determine the commercial and multi -family markets for Navarre and the surrounding area to determine the appropriate development opportunities. • Design guidelines, zoning tools, and/or regulations for the remodels and tear -downs of the existing single-family homes. • Engage the residents, business owners, and elected officials to determine the feasibility of any redevelopment strategies. • Create clear redevelopment strategies for implementation. A Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) made up of fourteen Navarre area stakeholders was selected by the City Council to help guide the planning process around these topics. The first meeting of the PAC took place on Thursday, October 19, 2017 and included an overview of past planning studies and included a SWOT analysis discussion about the Navarre area. A community open house was held on Thursday, November 16, 2017 at the Long Lake Fire Station #2. The open house included several interactive activities aimed at getting feedback about what people want to see in Navarre and what they would like to change. An online engagement tool, Social Pinpoint, was also utilized to gather feedback. Social Pinpoint allowed participants to identify areas in the neighborhood where there are issues and to identify things they would like to see. Several survey questions were also collected using Social Pinpoint. Following the community open house and gathering responses from Social Pinpoint, a PAC meeting was held on Thursday, January 11, 2018 to present the findings from the community engagement. The discussion focused on the seven key issues presented to the City Council and a direction forward on each issue was determined. The draft report of this small area plan was presented to the PAC on Thursday, March 8 and to the City Council and the Planning Commission during a joint Work Session on April 9, 2018. The Navarre Small Area Plan was incorporated as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, which was adopted on Previous Planning Studies Several planning initiatives have been undertaken for the Navarre area in recent history. The following information provides an overview of those studies since 2006 to provide context for this small area plan process. Page 2 Navarre Moratorium / DSU Studv — 2006 In July of 2005, the City Council imposed a moratorium on development applications for the Navarre commercial area with the intent to study the area and develop a framework to guide future investment. The City enlisted the services of Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban (DSU) to provide an analysis of the existing conditions and to conduct a workshop with business and property owners and surrounding neighbors to present an analysis of existing conditions, explain the City Council's objectives, and facilitate a discussion about the future of the area. The discussion included a SWOT analysis of the Navarre area. Approximately 75 members of the public were in attendance. A narrative summarizing the outcomes of the workshop identified three objectives for the area: 1. Preserve the small-town atmosphere of Navarre 2. Creation of community area around the lakeshore 3. Encourage a functional, thriving business district DSU also conducted a joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting to present the workshop findings and assist the City in determining next steps for planning to support reinvestment in the Navarre area. This included a presentation of concept renderings depicting various improvements within the public right-of-way, including pedestrian amenities such as decorative sidewalk, seating areas, public art, enhanced landscaping, and signage. One concept explored the possibility of a roundabout at the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. Comprehensive Plan Discussion — 2010 In 2010, following the completion of the City's comprehensive plan, City staff and the City Council discussed options for updating the City's zoning map and ordinances for properties guided for higher density or mixed use. In the case of Navarre, the discussion included the possibility of developing a Mixed -Use Overlay District; however, this was never implemented. Navarre Community Initiative — 2011 The Navarre Community Initiative (NCI) is a group formed in late 2011 made up of residents and business owners of the Navarre area intended to provide input to the City Council regarding potential improvements for the area. In addition, the intent of the group is to enhance Navarre's quality of life with special emphasis on public safety, beautification, and preservation. The group's work includes defining short-term and long-term projects and enlisting the support of a variety of community partners to assist in their implementation. A City staff member serves as a liaison to the committee for communication purposes between the committee and City Council. In early 2012, NCI and the City sent a letter and questionnaire to Navarre businesses soliciting their thoughts and ideas for the area. Out of 58 questionnaires, only six responses were received. In the spring of 2012, NCI presented a petition to Navarre residents, which read "Agreeing with concerns that current traffic conditions in Navarre are a clear and present danger, I support safety improvements that affect pedestrians, bikers and autos as the number one priority in our Navarre community." The petition received approximately 200 signatures On July 16, 2012, members of NCI, city staff, and the Mayor conducted a walking tour of Navarre to identify issues and opportunities for the neighborhood. Hennepin County / Community Design Group — Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan 2012 On August 28, 2012, a group meeting was held at the Freshwater Institute as part of a series of meetings conducted by Hennepin County and Community Design Group to gather local input regarding the Hennepin County pedestrian plan and to identify issues with safe walking along county roads. Approximately 50 participants attended the meeting. The outcome of this process Page 3 was a final plan that seeks to improve conditions for walking in Hennepin County so that it can become a safer, more convenient, and more enjoyable transportation choice. City of Orono / Hennepin County — Street Light and Sidewalk Improvements — 2013 The City of Orono held a series of meetings to gather input from residents and businesses regarding future planning for Navarre. Meetings took place on February 11, April 8 and June 10, 2013 at Orono City Hall. Meetings included updates on recent activities regarding Navarre as well as review of street lighting options under consideration and discussion of sidewalk issues. Hennepin County Transportation Department staff were also involved in the process to discuss potential pedestrian and traffic safety improvements currently being studied. A survey was developed that allowed residents to comment on proposed street light alternatives. Following the public participation process, the City completed a streetlight and sidewalk improvement project in the summer of 2014. In addition, Hennepin County revised their striping plan for the crosswalks in response to recommendations from the City and residents at the June 10 meeting. There were approximately 40 attendees at the February 11 meeting, 35 attendees at the April 8 meeting, and 20 attendees at the June 10 meeting. Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota — Navarre Demonstration Project 2014-2015 In collaboration with Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota, the City held two open house meetings with Navarre residents and businesses to develop ideas for a potential Active Living Demonstration project. Demonstration projects are short-term projects or pop-up events intended to show what potential permanent improvements could look like. The City held the meetings to gather feedback on what issues could be addressed as part of the demonstration project. Objectives identified as part of the meetings included traffic calming and making the area more pedestrian friendly. Ideas for projects included bringing in temporary boulevard trees, improving trail connections to businesses, and providing community gathering spaces. The City had planned to seek grant funds from Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota for the demonstration project; however, due to the timing of the resignation of the City's Community Development Director, a grant application was not completed by the City. The NCI agreed to go forward with a scaled back version of some of the projects. Page 4 Int Navarre Study Area Map — Figure 1 Lake Interaction Opportunities One of the key issues identified for this study was whether the Navarre neighborhood can be expanded to touch and interact with Lake Minnetonka. Few opportunities exist to physically connect with the lake based on the Navarre boundaries shown in Figure 1. The most logical location to provide any sort of connection would be along the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue. The PAC identified this area as possible opportunity to connect with Lake Minnetonka. Should any of these properties redevelop in the future, it is possible that development could occur in a way that provides views of the lake. Through the community engagement process, feedback was received that was overwhelmingly opposed to any active lake access, such as a public launch, in this location. Environmental concerns were cited as the primary reasons. Therefore, connections with the lake in this area should be passive and limited to views and opportunities to walk or sit near the lakeshore. If development is proposed in the future, the city should work with developers to create a public space near the lakeshore, where appropriate. When redevelopment opportunities along the Lake present themselves, the City should consider if those redevelopment could provide a possible connection for the Navarre neighborhood with Lake during the redevelopment. Future Development Market Study Considerations Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC was hired to conduct a market study to evaluate potential development opportunities in the Navarre area. The entire market study is attached to this report as Appendix A. The scope included a review of key demographic trends, assessment of current market conditions for housing, and analysis of the current commercial market in the Lake Minnetonka area. The study identifies seven potential redevelopment areas and describes the potential land uses that could result. These land uses are an indication of what the market would support but do not Page 5 necessarily represent the desires of the neighborhood. The seven redevelopment areas are identified in Figure 2. The study finds that many of the properties could accommodate a variety of different land uses given their location, access, and surrounding land uses. Recommended uses based on market demand include retail, for -sale townhomes, for -sale condominiums, senior housing, and rental housing. Market Study Map — Figure 2 Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Commercial Market The market study finds that Navarre and the greater Lake Minnetonka area is under -retailed. An opportunity exists to attract additional retail businesses to the Navarre area along Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. The market study identifies Sites #4 and #5 (see Table 29 above) as being the most attractive to retail tenants. Attracting additional retail businesses to Navarre would also Page 6 TABLE 29 SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT SITE POTENTIAL USES 1 3.66 x x 2 4.58 x x 3 1.86 x x 4 2.60 x x x x 5 6.78 x x x x 6 2.22 x x 7 2.63 x x x Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Commercial Market The market study finds that Navarre and the greater Lake Minnetonka area is under -retailed. An opportunity exists to attract additional retail businesses to the Navarre area along Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. The market study identifies Sites #4 and #5 (see Table 29 above) as being the most attractive to retail tenants. Attracting additional retail businesses to Navarre would also Page 6 be consistent with feedback received through the community engagement process, as the neighborhood desires a more robust commercial district with places to go. There is currently no market for speculative office development. Build -to -suit office development may occur for specific businesses but those decisions on site attractiveness would consider different factors than considered in this market study. Residential Market In looking at the market -supported residential uses, for -sale townhomes would likely only be supported on Site #2, due to higher land costs on the other sites. Mid -rise for -sale condominiums and rental housing could likely be supported on all of the sites. Residential densities for multi- family housing in third -tier suburbs, such as Orono, are generally in the 25 to 40 units an acre range. Increasing the number of residential units near the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road would likely increase the potential for greater pedestrian traffic and provide support for additional retail businesses. Higher residential densities also help to justify public investment in pedestrian infrastructure such as enhanced pavement, lighting, benches, decorations and landscaping. Mixed responses were received regarding the desire for higher residential density in Navarre; however, there was overwhelming support for pedestrian improvements and additional retail businesses and places to go. Generally, higher residential densities are required to justify spending on pedestrian improvements and to attract additional retail businesses. Navarre will need to consider these tradeoffs carefully when reviewing future proposals for higher density residential housing. Other Uses Considered The market for hospitality has been oversaturated and therefore a hotel is not likely to be supported at any of the identified locations. If lake access were available, a small boutique hotel could be a possibility in Navarre. Additionally, office uses will be very difficult to attract in Navarre as the office market cannot generate the rents needed to support new construction; however, an office building with a built -to -suit tenant would be an ideal use for several of the identified sites. Transportation Irn 0 ents Improvements to County Road Intersection Overwhelmingly, residents of the Navarre area find the intersection of Shoreline Drive (County Rd 15) and Shadywood Road (County Rd 19) to be dangerous and unwelcoming to pedestrians and cyclists. Traffic volumes, speeds, and the orientation of the intersection all contribute to unfavorable pedestrian conditions. Based on feedback received through the citizen engagement process, a priority for the neighborhood is to make the area more pedestrian friendly. With both of these roadways under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County, the City will need to work closely with the County to ensure that future improvements meet the needs of the neighborhood. As part of any road improvement, an objective should be to reduce speeds of motor vehicles and consider all modes of transportation. This may be achieved with lane narrowing or other optical illusions to get drivers to respond accordingly. However, since the roadway is already at capacity in terms of traffic volumes, it is unlikely that improvements will aim to drastically reduce speeds. Another objective should be to tighten up the intersection and make traffic movements for all modes of traffic more predictable. Eliminating some of the free -right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners of 15/19 intersection should be options that are considered, which would help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Hennepin County has obtained federal funding to make safety improvements to the intersection. The project is scheduled in the County's capital improvement plan for 2019. Hennepin County Page 7 may begin community outreach in 2018. In addition to broader community engagement, utilizing the PAC from this small area plan as a focus group could provide the County a good opportunity for enhanced local input. Traffic Volumes Map — Figure 3 Navarre Small Area Plan - Traffic Volumes Arterial Capacity The segments of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road within the Navarre area would be classified as three lane undivided roadways with a capacity of 15,000 to 17,000 vehicles per day. Current and projected traffic volumes are consistent with that of a four -lane undivided roadway, as shown in Figure 4. The objective of the neighborhood to enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility is not consistent with a common transportation goal to move as many vehicles through the area as quickly as possible. This plan supports improvements to the intersection that improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists while still reasonably accommodating vehicle traffic. The City should continue to work with Hennepin County on a plan that achieves safety improvements for pedestrians and cyclists, while also exploring improvements to other arterials in the area that could relieve some of the traffic pressure through Navarre. Page 8 Navarre Small Area Plan Figure 4 - Planning Level Urban Roadway Capacities Trail to Businesses Connection Shadywood Trail Connection The Dakota Rail Trail is a valuable recreation and transportation asset to the Navarre Community, spanning 13 miles through the communities of St. Bonifacius, Minnetrista, Mound, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, and Wayzata. As a highly -used bike and walking trail, an opportunity exists to connect trail users to the Navarre area. Presently, there is not an ideal physical connection to draw people from the trail towards the businesses and the park. At the time of this report, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, and the City of Orono have discussed an unformalized agreement to fund a trail connection south of the trail along Shadywood Road to the park. This connection was also well supported throughout the community engagement process. The implementation of this trail connection should be a priority for Navarre. Additional analysis will need to be done to identify the necessary mitigation required to impacted property owners. Additional community engagement should also be done regarding the trail connection and could be done concurrently with the engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. The City of Orono should continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection to keep the process moving forward. Community Events Through the community engagement process, it was found that there is a desire to create a sense of place and enhanced sense of community. One of the ways this could be achieved is through community events. Through the community engagement process, people responded favorably to the idea of an annual festival in Navarre. An annual festival would bring people to the area and create an awareness of what Navarre is. The community engagement process also revealed a desire to see enhanced branding for Navarre. The city -owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road provides a centralized location and public open space for an event. The enhancement of this public space to accommodate uses in addition to parking should be explored. An event could be centered around the Dakota Rail Trail and include some kind of race or walkathon. An event could be coordinated in collaboration with nearby communities and feature different attractions along the trail. In addition to an annual event, Navarre could host a regular farmers' market in collaboration with Mound, which currently hosts a farmers' market along the trail. Page 9 Daily Two-way Volume Shoreline Drive (vehicles) (County Road 15) Facility Type Current 2030 Lower Higher Traffic Traffic Threshold Threshold Level Forecast Two lane undivided 10,000 12,000 N/A N/A Arterials Two lane divided or N/A Three lane undivided 15,000 17,000 17,800 Four lane undivided 18,000 22,000 18,100 Trail to Businesses Connection Shadywood Trail Connection The Dakota Rail Trail is a valuable recreation and transportation asset to the Navarre Community, spanning 13 miles through the communities of St. Bonifacius, Minnetrista, Mound, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, and Wayzata. As a highly -used bike and walking trail, an opportunity exists to connect trail users to the Navarre area. Presently, there is not an ideal physical connection to draw people from the trail towards the businesses and the park. At the time of this report, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, and the City of Orono have discussed an unformalized agreement to fund a trail connection south of the trail along Shadywood Road to the park. This connection was also well supported throughout the community engagement process. The implementation of this trail connection should be a priority for Navarre. Additional analysis will need to be done to identify the necessary mitigation required to impacted property owners. Additional community engagement should also be done regarding the trail connection and could be done concurrently with the engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. The City of Orono should continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection to keep the process moving forward. Community Events Through the community engagement process, it was found that there is a desire to create a sense of place and enhanced sense of community. One of the ways this could be achieved is through community events. Through the community engagement process, people responded favorably to the idea of an annual festival in Navarre. An annual festival would bring people to the area and create an awareness of what Navarre is. The community engagement process also revealed a desire to see enhanced branding for Navarre. The city -owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road provides a centralized location and public open space for an event. The enhancement of this public space to accommodate uses in addition to parking should be explored. An event could be centered around the Dakota Rail Trail and include some kind of race or walkathon. An event could be coordinated in collaboration with nearby communities and feature different attractions along the trail. In addition to an annual event, Navarre could host a regular farmers' market in collaboration with Mound, which currently hosts a farmers' market along the trail. Page 9 The Navarre Community Initiative had developed a community event as late at 2016 which was well received. Any community event will require continued leadership from those within the community, most likely in the form of volunteer residents and area stakeholders. Community partners should consider the formation of a 501(c)3 organization should be explored for the purpose of managing an annual festival. Partnerships with the City of Orono, Hennepin County, and Three Rivers Park District could be beneficial in carrying on a successful ongoing festival. With a 501(c)3 organization, the public or agencies may donate resources or in-kind services to assist in the cost of any event, such as police or public works assistance. Existing Single -Family Housing In highly desirable areas, including the Navarre community, existing single-family homes are more frequently torn down to reconstruct newer single-family homes. In some cases, this is beneficial, as blighted properties are removed and larger homes bring in increased property value and young families. In other cases, there may be issues, such as new development being inconsistent with the existing neighborhood character and disruption during the construction. Navarre has already experienced some signs of this development pressure. As such, outreach was done regarding this topic as part of the small area plan process. Generally, people responded that their concern surrounding the tear down and rebuild of single family homes in the area is low to moderate. The top two issues identified for which there is a moderate level of concern include preservation of existing neighborhood character and the height of new development. The City should review development standards applicable to single family homes in Navarre and make sure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging redevelopment of blighted properties to occur. A proactive approach to code enforcement and property maintenance should also be taken to address properties that are deteriorating and detracting from the neighborhood. t �N Implementation Q1*1 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka • As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. Future Development • Consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development. • Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas. • Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, fagade articulation, and entryways. • Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw. • Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking. Page 10 Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses. Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles. Consider developing a fagade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements • Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. • Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features. • Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. • Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. Shadywood Trail Connection • Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward. • Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required. • Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events • Encourage the development of a community festival. Community partners should consider forming a 501(c)3 organization to assist in fundraising and administration of a community festival. • Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail. • Utilize the city -owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event. • Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival. • Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre. • Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers' market to organize a farmers' market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre. • Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Page 11 Tear Downs • Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures. • Proactively address blighted properties through the City's code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City's code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. • Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. Page 12 LIST OF APPENDICES Market Study Public Engagement Traffic Information Appendix Maxfield Research & Consulting December 19, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates FROM: Mr. Matt Mullins & Ms. Hannah Bonestroo Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC. RE: Initial Market Assessment for the Navarre Small Area Plan in Orono, Minnesota Introduction/Purpose and Scope of Research This memorandum contains an initial market assessment to evaluate the potential develop- ment opportunities in Navarre neighborhood located in Orono, Minnesota. The scope of the study includes a review of key demographic trends, an assessment of current market conditions for housing, and analysis of the current commercial market in the Lake Minnetonka area. The methodology used to calculate demand in this memorandum is proprietary to Maxfield Re- search but is consistent with methodologies used by analysts throughout the housing industry. This report includes primary and secondary research. Primary research includes interviews with rental property and self -storage managers gathering data on existing and proposed rental and self -storage properties. Secondary research is credited to the source when used, and is usually data from the U.S. Census or regional planning agencies. Secondary research is always used as a basis for analysis, and is carefully reviewed in light of other factors that may impact projec- tions such as residential building permit data or migration trends. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Navarre Trade Area December 19, 2017 Page 2 Navarre is located within the City of Orono. While Orono only has a population of just over 8,000 people (Esri 2017), approximately 56,000 other people (Esri 2017) live within a 5 -mile ra- dius of the site set from the intersection of Shadywood Road and Shoreline Drive. Notable communities within a five -mile radius of Navarre include: Wayzata, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Long Lake, Maple Plain, Medina, Excelsior, Minnetrista, and Chanhassen. Downtown Minneapolis is only a 20 -30 -minute drive from Navarre via Highway 12/394. The neighborhood is located along Shoreline Drive which is utilized by around 17,600 vehicles each day (MnDOT). Navarre 1 -Mile, 3 -Mile, & 5 -Mile Radius a pie Plain _ 4 � Parlw rs � Narw in- Lt i - Labe - Orono a Parti x Lan_q Lake = - .. 5,;2Bivr1 — Go If ClubrWayzata ISI fa Algid.-- �841nu -,`tia;' to Ba, 3 �I Z `G, rc vm BiY ' 7,r ^t ',rm ice. Lakz Ldinnetanka Parti. MinnC i,nka ak Nlooda r "r- Spf nq Park Farm Mound iv4 Coo ks a Minn trista g.al10%t4sBeep-haven Gideon 4 S t Bonifactus Bal Itl celstor �y S ±phway `�h Shcrewaacfsa J, L ,.n — £ J 3 C row n G�Ila�e °1"r °R ?a ' o _arver .,i Farb. Peseru_- a w '4a91sy Vi Rd r6areium4lyy I Chanhassen Victoria `+. Ilii v 'd178oh St ',, 21'� —_ Land AciFT =EsfenPralri. °i Ribcieluin. — �' � n f,l ilkr MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 3 Neighborhood Analysis Navarre is a community of 342 people (Esri 2017) that covers just over 100 acres in southern Orono, MN. Orono, located in Hennepin County, has a population of 8,179 (Esri 2017). Situated on Shoreline Drive, the subject area is almost completely surrounded by Lake Minnetonka, the ninth largest lake in Minnesota and a popular attraction for boaters, sailors, and fishermen. The site is bordered to its West by Spring Park, to its South by Tonka Beach, and is about 18.5 miles away from Downtown Minneapolis. The site area consists of 230 parcels comprising of a variety of uses. Residential land uses are by far the most common type of use present representing roughly 60% of parcels and 38% of acres. There are 24 vacant parcels in Navarre of various land uses. Of special interest are 27 parcels, mostly along Shoreline Drive, which are particularly suited for redevelopment. The fol- lowing table, maps, and photos depict the site location and the surrounding land uses. Apartments Commerical Common Area Residential Seasonal- Residential Townhouse Vacant Subtotal TABLE 1 PARCEL SUMMARY NAVARRE Source: Realist Tax, Maxfield Research & Consulting LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC $510,000 $795,000 WM 1 0.96 $285,000 26 33.60 $5,654,000 6 10.39 $0 137 38.80 $12,703,000 8 2.50 $554,000 28 1.04 $672,000 24 14.01 $663,000 230 101.3 $20,531,000 Source: Realist Tax, Maxfield Research & Consulting LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC $510,000 $795,000 $7,441,000 $13,095,000 $0 $0 $16,571,000 $29,274,000 $801,000 $1,355,000 $4,143,000 $4,815,000 $0 $663,000 $29,466,000 $49,997,000 Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Navarre Site Parcels December 19, 2017 Page 4 Navarre Land Use by Parcel il-esr.drnr iTogo Rd A� Id County Rd �� northern ��e Crystal P1 — II■■■1■ ■11111111 � �� ■II■111 1 ■11■1111■i �� �■ m■■■I 1■1�■�11■1111 o{e� MINE on IN Land Use��- Apartment oQe �L Commercial L9 Common Area L l_'ar�riaf� 1iaE' � Residential Seasonal Residential Townhouse Vacant 0 0.1'25 0.25 0.5 ��tiles MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Navarre Site Location December 19, 2017 Page 5 0 0 325 0.25 0.5 Miles. o fYsst,4)iTg'AoOld County Rd e Crystal PI �t ga o� �y `oe Take kfinnet whi L y� C LP Loi7iz Lake ORONO - Site Area 0 0.5 4 2 Miles MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Navarre Zoning, 2017 ('r,i'.ctiif Y3aY JK>.v Ai—w Togo }fid Po, 14 o4Lhef0 \,je Crystal Pi ��� ®11■1■n■nl ■■■■■1 ■1■1111■ himII■II ■1111 ■ Zoning Districts Business _ B-1 - Retail Sales B-3 - Shopping Center 1z, _ B-4-Office/Professional B-5 - Limited Neighborhood Lakeshore Residential LR -1C - One Family Lakeshore ResidentW - 1/2 Acre LR -1C-1 - One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict - 1/2 Acre Planned Unit Development PRD - Planned Residential Development Traffic Counts c 01 '9L December 19, 2017 Page 6 Id County Rd V 10075 0.15 0.3 Miles I i s i I i i I Traffic counts are provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Traffic counts are reported as the number of vehicles expected to pass a given location on an average day of the year. This value is called the "annual average daily traffic" and are represented on traffic count or traffic volume maps. The AADT is based on a short-term traffic count, usually 48 hours, taken at the location. This count is then adjusted for the variation in traffic volume throughout the year and the average number of axles per vehicle. Short-term counts are col- lected over a three-year cycle. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 7 According to MnDOT 17,600 vehicles utilize Shoreline Drive on the southern border of Navarre daily. Shadywood Road, which runs through the eastern half of Navarre, has an annual average daily traffic count of 4,900, while Sunset Drive, just west of the site, has and AADT of 2,490. The maps on the following page illustrate the drive times from the subject property and traffic counts. This information is helpful in determining a draw area for various services in the area. It is also useful to determine access to workforce as potential business operations would likely give strong consideration to commuting patterns when making location decisions. As shown, the Site can be reached within a 20 to 30 -minute drive of Downtown Minneapolis. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Drive Time R,:kfcwd �i ` Fridley Brooklyn ' rake F-6eu Gent r ' ,12' De@ari: NJ;iHope IJ toy _ • ltd Crystal = diva - c _ ' , Minneapolis St LWis Park W `.-°`4a5t ,n E -AeSi Mars Minnetonka Mi nn etri sta a . - •� w _ Edina ;N 5Cm st Mayer - _ - ..:` w `-il :k`��e�"',�fj W Gull 31 II1 •ap "I ' •° - 4v=`- .S. fawn h. en 'r_�--.Eden W that V+ TEth S Richfteicf l ., Inrl:, rV •�n. It toric - Prairie. e a. nsDa�l— LEWacomaF m a Pi.,... lig j LL 'Jd S 71 - o Blvvmingtgton E. Il 'V.Ivy W Old ShaN.ap �'d y Shakopee I.. Ni"'. F d wng America Chaska - -1, n,,-- rv_+n Fa r1c IiC ffR rued Cne olo ttur _ tJ 9ieC..' Savaae + Burnsville,, MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 8 Navarre Traffic Counts ! Togo Rd �9pp Id County R O� tqooern Ave C stat PI P ti� ; eft ore ?7,600440T r Qo��ti 00 \Lake lvlrivnet nka Carman Bay °P 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles Population & Household Growth Trends Population and household growth trends and projections are analyzed in this section because these are key indicators of the potential demand for new housing units and additional commer- cial space in a community. We also analyze data on population age distribution, household in- come, household tenure, and household type to determine the housing and shopping needs of the local household base. Table 2 presents population and household growth trends in the Market Area from 2000 to 2022. The 2000 and 2010 population and household figures were obtained from the U.S. Cen- sus Bureau. The 2017 estimate and projection for 2022 are based on data provided by ESRI with adjustments made by Maxfield Research to reflect current year data. The following are key points from Table 2. • As of 2017, Orono is estimated to have 8,179 people. Between 2000 and 2010, the pop- ulation decreased 1.3% (-101) while the number of households increased 2.1% (+58). • In 2017, the population of Navarre is estimated to make up 4.2% of the total population of Orono. While Hennepin County experienced growth between 2000 and 2010, Orono decreased in population. However, both the city and county are expected to grow from 2017 to 2022. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 9 • Although the population of Navarre was only 342 persons in 2017; the population in- creases to over 2,100 persons within a one -mile radius, nearly 21,000 within three miles, and over 56,000 within five -miles. Household growth outpaced population growth during the 2000s and is forecast to do so through 2022. The aging of the baby -boom generation, declining birth rates, and many couples choosing to postpone having children until later in life are all factors con- tributing to a declining average household size. These trends will continue to generate demand for more diverse housing products such as townhomes, and condominiums. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 2 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS MARKET AREA 2000 to 2022 ••i • • 2000 2010 2017 2022 No. Pct. No. Pct. Navarre N/A N/A 342 357 N/A N/A 15 4.4% Navarre 1 -mile radius N/A N/A ,2,102 2,195 N/A N/A 93 4.4% Navarre 3 -mile radius N/A N/A 20,890 21,826 N/A N/A 936 4.5% Navarre 5 -mile radius N/A N/A 56,133 58,823 N/A N/A 2,690 4.8% Orono City 7,538 7,437 8,179 8,678 -101 -1.3% 499 6.1% Hennepin County 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,248,638 1,312,919 36,225 3.2% 64,281 5.1% HOUSEHOLDS Navarre N/A N/A 175 181 N/A N/A 6 3.4% Navarre 1 -mile radius N/A N/A 932 968 N/A N/A 36 3.9% Navarre 3 -mile radius N/A N/A 8,723 9,090 N/A N/A 367 4.2% Navarre 5 -mile radius N/A N/A 21,685 22,670 N/A N/A 985 4.5% Orono City 2,763 2,821 3,080 3,253 58 2.1% 173 5.6% Hennepin County 456,129 473,856 511,605 536,306 17,727 3.9% 24,701 4.8% PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD Navarre N/A N/A 1.95 1.97 Orono City 2.73 2.64 2.66 2.67 Hennepin County 2.45 2.43 2.44 2.45 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; ESRI; Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Age Distribution December 19, 2017 Page 10 The age distribution of a community's population helps in assessing the type of housing and commercial services needed. For example, younger and older people are more attracted to higher density housing located near urban services and entertainment while middle-aged peo- ple (particularly those with children) traditionally prefer lower -density single-family homes. In terms of retail, younger people typically seek services such as entertainment, electronics, and specialty apparel. Child stores increase in popularity for the 25 to 34 and 35 to 44 age cohorts while home furnishings are more frequently sought by the 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 age groups. Table 3 presents the age distribution of the Market Area population from 2000 to 2022. Infor- mation from 2000 and 2010 is sourced from the U.S. Census. The 2017 estimates and projec- tions for 2022 were calculated by Maxfield Research based on information from local building permits and economic conditions. The following are key trends about the age distribution of the Market Area's population. • In 2017, we estimate that the largest adult cohort by age in Navarre is 45 to 54 totaling 63 people (19.4% of the total population), followed by the 55 to 64 age group with 56 people (17.3%). The same trend was found in Orono where the two largest age cohorts are also 45 to 54 (21.0%) and 55 to 64 (17.8%). • The greatest growth is projected to occur among older adults. Aging of baby boomers led to a 51.4% increase (+1,537 people) in the 55 to 64 population between 2000 and 2010 in Orono. As this group ages, the 65 to 74 and 75 plus age groups are projected to experience rapid growth from 2017 to 2022, expanding 28.0% and 32.8%, respectively. • A decline in the middle age cohorts is projected between 2017 and 2022 in Orono. The 45 to 54 age cohort is expected to decline 5.8%. • The weak growth projected for the middle age population is a result of the compara- tively small number of people who will move into those age cohorts between 2017 and 2022, a phenomenon known as the "baby bust." The "baby bust" is often referred to the generation of children born between 1965 and 1980, an era when the United States birthrate dropped sharply. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. 2.500 o 2,000 L 4J 4-- 1,500 L d1 E 1,000 500 0 35.0°/0 30.0% 25.0% 20,0% c s 15.001 U 10.001 v 5.0! 0.0/ 5.0010 -10,0% Population Age Distribution Orono 2017 December 19, 2017 Page 11 ■ 2017 ■ X722 11 11 11111111 1 Under 18 18 to 24 25 to 34 3.5 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 6.5 to 74 75 plus Age Cohort Percent Change in a Distribution From 2017-2022 ■ Navarre ■ Oro in Age Cohort MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC I. 1 III 110 In III nderrl8 V24 25 to 34 35 to 44 k 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 plus Age Cohort MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 12 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 3 POPULATION AGE DISTRIBUTION PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2000-2022 U.S. Census I ESRI Change 2000-2010 Change 2017-2022 2000 2010 2017 2022 No. Pct. No. Pct. Under 18 N/A 66 63 65 N/A N/A 2 3.2% 18 to 24 N/A 16 18 17 N/A N/A -1 -5.6% 25 to 34 N/A 36 41 43 N/A N/A 2 4.9% 35 to 44 N/A 49 48 51 N/A N/A 3 6.3% 45 to 54 N/A 63 58 55 N/A N/A -3 -5.2% 55 to 64 N/A 56 61 63 N/A N/A 2 3.3% 65 to 74 N/A 26 40 47 N/A N/A 7 17.5% 75 plus N/A 12 15 1;� N/ N/A 3 20.0% � Total N/A 324 344 359 N/A N/A 15 44.4% Under 18 2,062 1,976 1,968 1,920 -86 -4.2% -48 -2.4% 18 to 24 337 325 439 468 -12 -3.6% 29 6.6% 25 to 34 597 400 493 549 -197 -33.0% 56 11.4% 35 to 44 1,414 914 872 927 -500 -35.4% 55 6.3% 45 to 54 1,578 1,559 1,454 1,369 -19 -1.2% -85 -5.8% 55 to 64 874 1,323 1,537 1,607 449 51.4% 70 4.6% 65 to 74 420 587 956 1,224 167 39.8% 268 28.0% 75 plus 256 353 1 457 607 97 37.9% 150 32.8% Total 7,538 7,437 8,176 8,671 -101 51.7% 495 81.4% Hennepin County Under 18 267,502 261,345 268,719 274,768 -6,157 -2.3% 6,049 2.3% 18 to 24 108,767 113,551 124,686 125,843 4,784 4.4% 1,157 0.9% 25 to 34 183,860 187,523 191,588 198,828 3,663 2.0% 7,240 3.8% 35 to 44 191,872 154,304 164,543 178,271 -37,568 -19.6% 13,728 8.3% 45 to 54 156,068 171,130 161,675 156,373 15,062 9.7% -5,302 -3.3% 55 to 64 85,773 133,758 160,972 163,600 47,985 55.9% 2,628 1.6% 65 to 74 59,737 66,516 101,312 125,133 6,779 11.3% 23,821 23.5% 75 plus 62,621 64,298 75,143 90,103 1,677 2.7% 14,960 19.9% Total 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,248,638 1,312,919 36,225 64.1% 64,281 57.1% Sources: U.S. Census; ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 13 Household Income Distribution Income data is useful in that it can reflect wage trends and helps assess living conditions and reveal demand for different types of services. This data also helps determine demand for differ- ent types of owned and rented housing based on the size of the market at specific cost levels. In general, housing costs of up to 30 percent of income are considered affordable by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Household income data also helps ascertain demand for different types of retail services. People with lower incomes are likely to seek out discount retailers and spend a higher proportion of their income on necessities like grocery items. Retail services and goods such as dining and home furnishings will experience higher spending from more moderate -income households while upper income households will also shop for specialty apparel, recreation and sporting goods, and luxury items. The next three tables present data on household income by age of householder in 2017 and 2022 for Navarre, Orono, and Hennepin County. The data is estimated by ESRI and adjusted by Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC to reflect the most current local household estimates and projections. The following are key points. • In 2017, the median household income for Navarre is estimated to be $91,744. This value is lower than the estimate for Orono ($136,259), but significantly higher than that of Hennepin County ($68,497). However, the median income for Navarre is expected to increase by 15.5% to $105,955 by 2022. • As households age through the lifecycle, their household income tends to peak in their late 40s and early 50s. This trend is evident in the Market Area as the age 45 to 54 co- hort has the highest estimated income at $189,487 in Orono. • Rental housing often targets younger renter households. The median household income in Orono is $63,804 for the under -25 age group and $102,544 for the 25 to 34 age group. Households earning the median income for these age groups could afford monthly housing costs estimated at $1,595 and $2,564, respectively. • Households in the 35 to 44 age group that may delay buying a home could afford a $3,879 monthly rent, based on the median household income of $155,158. • The median sale price for new construction multifamily housing units (twinhomes and detached townhomes) in Orono is approximately $677,00 (based on recently sold and active listings). Assuming that a potential home buyer has good credit and makes a 20% down payment, a household would need to have a minimum annual income of roughly $166,000 to be income -qualified for a new construction multifamily unit purchased at the median price in Orono. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. $200,000 $180,000 $160,000 $140;000 $120,000 $100,000 $8©,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 <25 ■ Navarre ■ 0rono Income Trends by Age of Householder (2017) December 19, 2017 Page 14 45-54 55-64 ■ Navarre 1 -Mile Radius Navarre 3 -Mile Radius ■ Navarre 5 -Mile Radius Hennepin Twin Cities Metro Area ■ Minnesota MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 15 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 4 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 $15,000 to $24,999 8 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 $25,000 to $34,999 6 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 $35,000 to $49,999 29 1 5 5 4 5 6 3 $50,000 to $74,999 28 1 5 5 5 6 4 2 $75,000 to $99,999 18 1 3 4 3 3 3 1 $100,000 to $149,999 31 1 4 6 7 8 4 1 $150,000 to $199,999 14 0 2 3 4 4 1 0 $200,000+ 38 0 2 7 11 13 4 1 Total 175 4 23 32 36 42 27 11 Median Income $91,744 $75,000 $71,478 $100,000 $123,670 $120,118 $63,528 $46,511 Less than $15,000 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 $15,000 to $24,999 9 0 1 1 1 1 3 2 $25,000 to $34,999 6 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 $35,000 to $49,999 25 1 4 4 3 4 6 3 $50,000 to $74,999 27 1 5 5 4 5 5 2 $75,000 to $99,999 17 1 3 4 2 3 3 1 $100,000 to $149,999 36 1 5 7 7 9 6 1 $150,000 to $199,999 17 0 2 4 4 5 1 1 $200,000+ 43 0 3 8 12 14 5 1 Total 181 4 24 34 33 43 31 14 Median Income $105,955 $75,000 $81,880 $110,312 $144,931 $131,812 $71,613 $43,660 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 $15,000 to $24,999 1 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 1 $25,000 to $34,999 -0 0 -0 -0 -1 -0 -0 1 $35,000 to $49,999 -4 -0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -0 -0 $50,000 to $74,999 -1 -0 -0 -0 -1 -1 1 -0 $75,000 to $99,999 -1 -0 -0 -0 -1 -0 -0 -0 $100,000 to $149,999 5 -0 1 1 -0 1 2 -0 $150,000 to $199,999 3 0 -0 1 -0 1 -0 1 $200,000+ 5 0 1 1 1 1 1 -0 Total -1 -0 -0 -0 -4 -1 3 2 Median Income $14,211 $0 $10,402 $10,312 $21,261 $11,694 $8,085 -$2,851 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 16 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 5 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 1 -MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 24 2 2 2 2 6 4 6 $15,000 to $24,999 44 2 4 4 3 4 18 9 $25,000 to $34,999 36 2 5 5 4 6 7 7 $35,000 to $49,999 126 S 21 19 17 23 25 16 $50,000 to $74,999 148 5 27 21 23 32 26 14 $75,000 to $99,999 97 4 17 18 16 20 17 5 $100,000 to $149,999 155 3 20 26 31 39 30 6 $150,000 to $199,999 69 1 9 14 19 19 5 2 $200,000+ 237 2 15 38 64 79 32 6 Total 938 26 120 147 180 229 165 71 Median Income $97,619 $57,692 $76,100 $106,122 $136,225 $124,911 $77,335 $46,812 1 Less than $15,000 24 2 2 2 1 6 5 6 $15,000 to $24,999 43 2 4 3 3 3 17 11 $25,000 to $34,999 33 2 5 5 2 4 7 8 $35,000 to $49,999 114 4 18 17 14 18 26 17 $50,000 to $74,999 133 4 25 19 17 26 27 15 $75,000 to $99,999 99 4 18 18 14 19 19 7 $100,000 to $149,999 174 3 22 31 31 43 37 8 $150,000 to $199,999 81 1 11 17 20 21 7 4 $200,000+ 268 2 19 43 66 87 43 9 Total 968 24 124 155 167 226 187 85 Median Income $108,471 $60,207 $84,347 $116,920 $153,886 $141,252 $89,341 $50,556 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 - -0 -0 -1 -0 1 -0 $15,000 to $24,999 -0 -0 -1 -0 -1 -1 2 $25,000 to $34,999 -0 _ -0 -0 -2 -2 -0 1 $35,000 to $49,999 -11 -3 -2 -3 -5 1 1 $50,000 to $74,999 to $99,999 -16f-1 0 -2 ilp$75,000 1 -2 0 -6 2 -6 1 1 2 1 2 $100,000 to $149,999 19 -0 2 5 -0 4 7 2 $150,000 to $199,999 12 -0 2 3 1 2 2 2 $200,000+ 31 -0 4 5 2 7 11 3 Total -13 -2 -3 -1 -15 -12 10 9 Median Income $10,852 $2,515 $8,247 $10,798 $17,661 $16,341 $12,006 $3,744 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 17 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 6 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 3 -MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 438 15 30 37 53 114 92 97 $15,000 to $24,999 472 19 35 45 44 80 113 136 $25,000 to $34,999 432 16 51 48 57 80 77 103 $35,000 to $49,999 907 32 111 117 134 175 180 158 $50,000 to $74,999 1,349 34 174 171 230 303 252 185 $75,000 to $99,999 1,048 19 138 165 209 261 192 64 $100,000 to $149,999 1,572 11 160 244 386 435 264 72 $150,000 to $199,999 789 5 65 143 238 217 98 23 $200,000+ 1,716 5 74 255 540 573 216 53 Total 8,723 156 838 1,225 1,891 2,238 1,484 891 Median Income $91,867 $47,455 $77,430 $104,070 $123,273 $108,725 $77,839 $44,226 1 Less than $15,000 460 16 28 40 40 103 109 124 $15,000 to $24,999 468 18 33 41 31 63 124 158 $25,000 to $34,999 407 13 44 45 35 66 83 121 $35,000 to $49,999 847 31 98 102 99 139 195 183 $50,000 to $74,999 1,233 29 153 155 165 245 271 215 $75,000 to $99,999 1,062 22 141 165 169 248 230 87 $100,000 to $149,999 1,783 13 184 289 364 473 348 112 $150,000 to $199,999 908 5 81 173 223 244 142 40 $200,000+ 1,922 5 90 299 498 636 307 87 Total 9,090 152 852 1,309 1,624 2,217 1,809 1,127 Median Income $101,249 $48,659 $85,486 $113,653 $133,315 $120,668 $86,626 $47,567 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 22 -2 3 -13 -11 17 27 $15,000 to $24,999 -4 1 -2 -4 -13 -17 11 22 $25,000 to $34,999 -25 -3 -7 -3 -22 -14 6 18 $35,000 to $49,999 -6 -1 -13 -15 -35 -36 15 25 $50,000 to $74,999 -116 -5 -21 -16 -65 -58 19 30 $75,000 to $99,999 11 3 3 0 -40 -13 38 23 $100,000 to $149,999 211 2 24 45 -22 38 84 40 $150,000 to $199,999 119 0 16 30 -15 27 44 17 $200,000+ 206 0 16 44 -42 63 91 34 Total 42 -4 -18 10 -210 -111 190 185 Median Income $9,382 $1,204 $8,056 $9,583 $10,042 $11,943 $8,787 $3,341 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 18 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 7 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 5 -MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 908 34 64 72 108 238 182 210 $15,000 to $24,999 953 34 70 80 91 173 251 254 $25,000 to $34,999 1,012 30 110 104 134 190 179 265 $35,000 to $49,999 1,861 61 227 218 267 361 346 381 $50,000 to $74,999 2,852 73 363 338 478 599 525 476 $75,000 to $99,999 2,412 43 301 367 484 613 466 138 $100,000 to $149,999 4,128 29 403 615 1,064 1,161 657 199 $150,000 to $199,999 2,411 14 213 452 723 654 275 80 $200,000+ 5,093 20 243 824 1,635 1,609 584 178 Total 21,632 338 1,994 3,070 4,984 5,599 3,465 2,181 Median Income $106,948 $52,275 $86,704 $123,984 $141,240 $121,815 $86,651 $48,954 1 Less than $15,000 964 36 65 78 81 218 215 271 $15,000 to $24,999 943 33 66 70 59 133 274 308 $25,000 to $34,999 954 25 99 97 85 155 190 303 $35,000 to $49,999 1,743 60 205 185 197 289 369 438 $50,000 to $74,999 2,613 64 328 300 328 483 561 549 $75,000 to $99,999 2,433 43 314 363 383 580 563 187 $100,000 to $149,999 4,575 31 470 701 964 1,238 868 304 $150,000 to $199,999 2,708 14 259 532 660 727 389 127 $200,000+ 5,686 19 300 964 1,533 1,759 831 281 Total 22,618 325 2,106 3,290 4,289 5,581 4,259 2,768 Median Income $113,617 $52,254 $97,540 $135,702 $152,691 $133,557 $97,629 $51,960 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 56 1 6 -27 -20 33 61 $15,000 to $24,999 -10 -4 -10 -32 -40 23 54 $25,000 to $34,999 -58 -5 -11 -7 -49 -35 11 38 $35,000 to $49,999 -11` -1 -22 -33 -70 -72 23 57 $50,000 to $74,999 -240 -9 -35 -38 -150 -116 36 73 $75,000 to $99,999 20 -0 13 -4 -101 -33 97 49 $100,000 to $149,999 447 2 67 86 -100 77 211 105 $150,000 to $199,999 296 -0 46 80 -63 73 114 47 $200,000+ 593 -1 57 140 -102 150 247 103 Total 97 -12 9 -0 -530 -240 433 437 Median Income $6,669 -$21 $10,836 $11,718 $11,451 $11,742 $10,978 $3,006 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 19 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 8 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER ORONO CITY 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 56 2 2 4 5 17 9 17 $15,000 to $24,999 87 2 4 6 8 15 32 20 $25,000 to $34,999 78 1 5 7 10 15 19 21 $35,000 to $49,999 180 4 19 21 26 34 35 41 $50,000 to $74,999 377 9 34 39 59 71 75 90 $75,000 to $99,999 322 6 32 49 60 77 69 29 $100,000 to $149,999 555 2 39 72 131 152 125 34 $150,000 to $199,999 333 1 25 56 97 88 48 18 $200,000+ 1,092 3 38 157 363 348 144 39 Total 3,080 30 198 411 759 817 556 309 Median Income $136,259 $63,804 $102,544 $155,158 $189,487 $163,004 $111,200 $62,452 1 Less than $15,000 62 2 2 4 6 14 12 22 $15,000 to $24,999 87 2 5 6 3 12 33 26 $25,000 to $34,999 74 1 5 7 6 13 20 22 $35,000 to $49,999 171 4 17 18 20 29 36 47 $50,000 to $74,999 353 7 32 33 41 57 79 104 $75,000 to $99,999 331 6 36 46 50 74 81 38 $100,000 to $149,999 622 2 44 79 125 161 160 51 $150,000 to $199,999 366 1 29 61 92 92 64 27 $200,000+ 1,186 3 45 169 346 371 195 57 Total 3,253 28 215 423 689 823 680 394 Median Income $141,731 $65,462 $108,435 $162,213 $200,001 $174,822 $119,256 $67,060 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 6 0 0 1 -3 3 5 $15,000 to $24,999 0 1 0 -5 -3 1 6 $25,000 to $34,999 -4 0 0 0 -4 -2 1 1 $35,000 to $49,999 - 0 -2 -3 -6 -5 1 6 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 -24 -2 0 -2 4 -6 -3 -18 -10 -14 -3 4 12 14 9 $100,000 to $149,999 67 0 5 7 -6 9 35 17 $150,000 to $199,999 33 0 4 5 -5 4 16 9 $200,000+ 94 0 7 12 -17 23 51 18 Total 46 -2 6 -5 -48 -21 57 58 Median Income $5,472 $1,658 $5,891 $7,055 $10,514 $11,818 $8,056 $4,608 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 20 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 9 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 & 2022 Total <25 25-34 Age 35-44 of Householder 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 44,258 5,988 7,575 5,589 5,278 7,799 5,294 6,735 $15,000 to $24,999 42,732 4,274 7,349 5,400 4,341 5,867 6,290 9,211 $25,000 to $34,999 40,300 3,349 8,681 5,917 4,874 5,646 5,229 6,604 $35,000 to $49,999 59,869 3,731 12,622 9,333 8,414 8,907 8,261 8,601 $50,000 to $74,999 85,577 3,925 18,235 14,698 14,278 14,539 11,084 8,818 $75,000 to $99,999 65,409 1,996 13,762 12,898 11,960 12,396 8,335 4,062 $100,000 to $149,999 85,199 1,230 15,432 18,274 18,676 18,690 9,352 3,545 $150,000 to $199,999 40,399 590 5,686 8,865 11,237 8,852 3,999 1,170 $200,000+ 47,862 353 4,452 9,802 13,383 13,151 5,085 1,636 Total 511,605 25,436 93,794 90,776 92,441 95,847 62,929 50,382 Median Income $68,497 $31,725 $62,192 $82,052 $92,581 $83,783 $62,080 $38,534 1 Less than $15,000 45,953 6,145 7,586 6,027 4,898 7,410 6,102 7,785 $15,000 to $24,999 41,982 4,105 6,729 4,805 3,720 5,253 6,933 10,437 $25,000 to $34,999 37,952 3,108 7,731 5,405 3,922 4,879 5,760 7,147 $35,000 to $49,999 56,015 3,556 11,215 8,320 7,071 7,554 8,957 9,342 $50,000 to $74,999 80,045 3,732 16,650 13,595 11,774 12,606 11,981 9,707 $75,000 to $99,999 67,819 2,343 14,146 13,323 11,019 11,943 10,018 5,027 $100,000 to $149,999 101,536 1,546 18,805 22,176 19,881 20,840 12,917 5,371 $150,000 to $199,999 48,706 759 7,297 11,004 11,875 10,169 5,769 1,833 $200,000+ 56,298 416 5,701 11,940 13,770 14,554 7,428 2,489 Total 536,306 25,710 95,860 96,595 87,930 95,208 75,865 59,138 Median Income $76,759 $32,967 $70,962 $92,712 $102,495 $94,729 $70,010 $40,513 Change 2017 - 2022 Less than $15,000 1,695 157 11 438 -380 -389 808 1,050 $15,000 to $24,999 -750 -169 -620 -595 -621 -614 643 1,226 $25,000 to $34,999 -2,348 -241 -950 -512 -952 -767 531 543 $35,000 to $49,999 -3,854 -175 -1,407 -1,013 -1,343 -1,353 696 741 $50,000 to $74,999 -5,532 -193 -1,585 -1,103 -2,504 -1,933 897 889 $75,000 to $99,999 2,410 347 384 425 -941 -453 1,683 965 $100,000 to $149,999 16,337 316 3,373 3,902 1,205 2,150 3,565 1,826 $150,000 to $199,999 8,307 169 1,611 2,139 638 1,317 1,770 663 $200,000+ 8,436 63 1,249 2,138 387 1,403 2,343 853 Total 7,958 42 -794 1,542 -5,536 -3,359 8,823 7,240 Median Income $8,262 $1,242 $8,770 $10,660 $9,914 $10,946 $7,930 $1,979 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Household Type December 19, 2017 Page 21 As with age distribution, the trends in types of households impact demand for different types of housing. Table 10 presents data on the types of households in the Market Area in 2010 and 2015. Family households include married -couple families with children (so-called "traditional" families), married couples without children (mostly empty nesters, but also young married cou- ples without children), and other -family households (single parents and unmarried couples with children). Non -family households include persons living alone and roommates (unrelated indi- viduals living together, including unmarried couples without children). • In 2015, there were a total of 3,184 family households in Orono including 766 married couples with children, 1,130 married couples without children, and 182 other families. Married couples without children include empty nesters, who are increasingly a market for for -sale multifamily housing and younger couples without children, who are also a primary market for rental housing. • From 2010 to 2015, the greatest growth among family households in Orono was among "other" families, which grew by 81 households (80.2%). This is in contrast with the de- crease by 119 households (-13.4%) in the number of married couples with children in Orono. Conversely, from 2010 to 2015 in Hennepin County, the number of families categorized as "other" decreased by 269 households (-0.6%) and the number of married couples with children increased by 65 households (0.1%). • There were 1,106 non -family households in Orono in 2015. This includes 126 persons living alone and 980 roommate households. Persons living alone added 28 households (28.6%) to Orono from 2010 to 2015, while the number of roommate households in- creased by 339 (52.9%). Roommate households consist of unrelated persons living with each other to share housing costs and unmarried couples without children, among oth- ers. These persons also tend to be younger and often prefer to live in locations that are closer to entertainment, activities, and other nightlife. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. 1,200 MO O i 800 tv a 600 al E 400 z 200 Household Type, Orono (2010-2.015) Household Type December 19, 2017 Page 22 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 10 HOUSEHOLD TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2010 & 2015 Households 2010 2015 Married w/ 2010 Child 2015 Family Households Married w/o Child 2010 2015 Other 2010 2015 Non -family Households Living Alone Roommates 2010 2015 2010 2015 Orono City Hennepin County 2,821 472,586 3,184 488,941 885 94,635 766 94,700 1,096 1,130 112,311 120,473 101 45,268 182 44,999 98 22,026 126 23,774 641 198,346 980 204,995 State of Minnesota 1,895,127 2,087,227 477,615 443,212 540,630 617,297 1 236,896 288,506 509,468 584,008 1 130,518 154,204 Percent Orono City Hennepin County 100.0 100.0 100.0 4 100.0 31.4% 20.0% 24.1% 19.4% 38.9% 35.5% 23.8% 24.6% 3.6% 9.6% 5.7% 9.2% 3.5% 4.7% 4.0% 4.9% 22.7% 42.0% 30.8% 41.9% State of Minnesota 100.0 100.01 1 25.2% 21.2% 28.5% 29.6% 12.5% 13.8% 26.9% 28.0% 6.9% 7A% No. Pct. No. Pct. Change 2010-2015 No. Pct. No. Pct. No. Pct. No. Pct. Orono City Hennepin County 363 16,355 12.9% 3.5% -119 65 -13.4% 0.1% 34 3.1% 8,162 7.3% 81 -269 80.2% -0.6% 28 1,748 28.6% 7.9% 339 6,649 52.9% 3.4% State of Minnesota 192,100 10.1% -34,403 -7.2% 76,667 14.2% 51,610 21.8% 74,540 14.6% 23,686 18.1% *Single -parents with children ** Includes unmarried couples without children and group quarters Sources: U. S. Census; ESRI, Inc.; Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Summary of Demographic Trends December 19, 2017 Page 23 The following points summarize key demographic trends that will impact development in Na- va rre. • The population in Orono is forecast to grow by 499 people (+6.1%) and 173 households (+5.6%) between 2017 and 2022. • The population over age 65 is expected to experience a substantial increase in Orono, as a result of the aging of the baby boom generation. • Median incomes are rising in Orono, with a 4.0% increase forecast between 2017 and 2022 as incomes rise from $136,259 to $141,731. • Only 15% of residential units in Orono are renter -occupied. Out of renter -occupied units, 66.7% are single-family homes, the rest are in structures with 50 or more units. • Between 2010 and 2015, married couple households with children decreased in Orono, while married couple households without children, other family households and household- ers living alone increased. Orono Building Permit Data Based on building permit data obtained from Metropolitan Council, Table 11 presents the num- ber of housing units added in Orono since 2007. • A total of 360 new housing units were delivered in Orono between 2007 and 2016. Approxi- mately 83% of the permitted units were for single-family homes (298), while 17.2% were for multifamily units (62 units). • The number of new permits generally increased each year since 2007. The number of per- mitted single-family housing units added from 2012 to 2016 (205 units) was over double of those added from 2007 to 2011 (93 units). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. TABLE 11 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PERMITTED UNITS ISSUED ORONO, MN 2007 to 2017 Units Permitted Year Family Multifamily Total Units 2007 23 0 23 2008 23 0 23 2009 20 0 20 2010 10 0 10 2011 17 62 79 2012 25 0 25 2013 39 0 39 2014 42 0 42 2015 62 0 62 2016 37 0 37 Total 298 62 360 Sources: Met Council; Maxfield Research & Consulting LLC Housing Units by Structure Type December 19, 2017 Page 24 Based on Census data, Table 12 presents the number of housing units by housing type as com- pared with housing tenure. Housing types compared include single-family detached units, townhouse units, and multifamily units. Multifamily includes duplex, triplex, and four-plex units as well as buildings with five or more units. • Out of all residential housing units in Orono about 94% were single-family homes, while only 6% of units were multifamily. However, when considering housing tenure, out of owner -occupied units, 99% were single family homes, while out of renter -occupied units 66.7% of units were single family homes. • For Hennepin County in 2015, single detached homes accounted for 90.4% of owner - occupied housing units. The largest portion of renter -occupied units in Hennepin County were those in structures containing 50 or more units accounting for 32.2% of all units. This compares with just in Orono, where structures containing 50 or more units were the only type of multifamily structure. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Housing Units by Structure, Orono City (2015) m ■2to9 ■10to19 20 to 49 ■ 5he -0 December 19, 2017 Page 25 Housing Units by Structure, Hennepin County (2015) 0% 14M N F*'l ■ 1 ■ 2 to 9 ■ 10 to 19 20 to 49 ■ 50+ ■ Other MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 26 Housing Resale Values Table 13 presents recently sold single family homes, condos/townhomes, and multi -family homes in Navarre and Orono from January 2017 to mid-November 2017. • A total of 186 properties were identified as recently sold in Orono with 153 single family homes listed and 33 condo or multi -family homes • The largest percentage (30%) of single family homes in Orono were sold for over $1,000,000. Only 5% of single family homes were sold for less than $200,000. • Only 16 homes have sold through mid-November 2017 in Navarre. Compared to Orono proper the housing market in Navarre is much more affordable as the average and me- dian sales price was $215,305 and $206,500, respectively. The housing stock is also older and smaller as the average home size was 1,476 finished square feet. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 12 HOUSING UNITS BY STRUCTURE & TENURE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2015 ORONO CITY HENNEPIN COUNTY Owner- Renter- Owner- Renter - Units in Structure Occupied Pct. Occupied Pct. Occupied Pct. Occupied Pct. 1, detached 2,615 96.6% 239 50.0% 247,800 80.6% 23,400 12.8% 1, attached 66 2.4% 80 16.7% 30,109 9.8% 12,592 6.9% 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,012 1.3% 12,829 7.0% 3 to 4 10 0.4% 0 0.0% 2,669 0.9% 8,885 4.9% 5 to 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,588 0.8% 10,911 6.0% 10 to 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,076 0.7% 22,573 12.3% 20 to 49 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,620 1.5% 32,276 17.7% 50 or more 15 0.6% 159 33.3% 12,573 4.1% 58,794 32.2% Mobile home 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 910 0.3% 446 0.2% Boat, RV, van, etc. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 38 0.0% 95 0.1% Total 2,706 100% 478 100% 307,395 100% 182,801 100% Sources: U.S. Census Bureau -American Community Survey; Maxfield Research and Consulting LLC Housing Resale Values Table 13 presents recently sold single family homes, condos/townhomes, and multi -family homes in Navarre and Orono from January 2017 to mid-November 2017. • A total of 186 properties were identified as recently sold in Orono with 153 single family homes listed and 33 condo or multi -family homes • The largest percentage (30%) of single family homes in Orono were sold for over $1,000,000. Only 5% of single family homes were sold for less than $200,000. • Only 16 homes have sold through mid-November 2017 in Navarre. Compared to Orono proper the housing market in Navarre is much more affordable as the average and me- dian sales price was $215,305 and $206,500, respectively. The housing stock is also older and smaller as the average home size was 1,476 finished square feet. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 27 Recently Sold Residential Properties, Orono (2017) $1,000,000 and over $900,000 to $999,999 � $800,000 to $899,000 $700,000 to $799,000 o $600,000 to )If ``a $500,(100 to $59 ol�mmm� $400,000 $4 $300,OOOt 3 99 $200,000 tea $ 9,999 $100,000t© $199,999 < $99,999 0 10 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 20 30 40 50 Count TABLE 13 RECENTLY SOLD (JANUARY 2017- NOVEMBER 2017) MARKET AREA Condo/ Townhomes/ Multi -Family Single Family Homes Homes Total Navarre Orono Navarre Orono Navarre Orono Cost Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent <$99,999 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 9% 0 0% 3 2% $100, 000 to $199,999 3 33% 8 5% 3 43% 0 0% 6 38% 8 4% $200, 000 to $299,999 5 56% 13 8% 4 57% 9 27% 9 56% 22 12% $300, 000 to $399,999 1 11% 12 8% 0 0% 14 42% 1 6% 26 14% $400, 000 to $499,999 0 0% 14 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 14 8% $500, 000 to $599, 000 0 0% 13 8% 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 14 8% $600, 000 to $699, 000 0 0% 12 8% 0 0% 5 15% 0 0% 17 9% $700, 000 to $799, 000 0 0% 11 7% 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 12 6% $800,000 to $899,000 0 0% 15 10% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 15 8% $900, 000 to $999,999 0 0% 9 6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 9 5% $1,000,000 and over 0 0% 46 30% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 46 25% Total 9 100% 153 100% 7 100% 33 100% 16 100% 186 100% Sources: Trulia; Realtor.com; RE/MAX; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Recently Sold Residential Properties, Orono (2017) $1,000,000 and over $900,000 to $999,999 � $800,000 to $899,000 $700,000 to $799,000 o $600,000 to )If ``a $500,(100 to $59 ol�mmm� $400,000 $4 $300,OOOt 3 99 $200,000 tea $ 9,999 $100,000t© $199,999 < $99,999 0 10 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 20 30 40 50 Count Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Active Listings December 19, 2017 Page 28 Table 14 presents currently listed, for -sale single family homes, condos, and multi -family homes in Navarre and Orono as of mid-November 2017. • A total of 115 properties were identified as actively listed for -sale in Orono with 101 sin- gle family homes listed and 14 condo or multi -family homes. • The largest percentage (50%) of single family homes in Orono were listed for over $1,000,000 with only 5% listed for under $300,000. • Only seven homes were listed for sale in the Navarre area. The median list price of these listings was $288,450. 1� v MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 14 ACTIVE LISTINGS , NOVEMBER 2017 Condo/ Townhomes/ Multi -Family Single Family Homes Homes Total Navarre Orono Navarre Orono Navarre Orono Cost Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent <$99,999 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $100, 000 to $199,999 3 50% 4 4% 0 0% 0 0% 3 43% 4 3% $200,000 to $299,999 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% $300, 000 to $399,999 1 17% 7 7% 0 0% 3 21% 1 14% 10 9% $400, 000 to $499,999 1 17% 4 4% 0 0% 1 7% 1 14% 5 4% $500, 000 to $599, 000 0 0% 4 4% 1 100% 3 21% 1 14% 7 6% $600,000 to $699,000 0 0% 6 6% 0 0% 4 29% 0 0% 10 9% $700, 000 to $799, 000 0 0% 6 6% 0 0% 2 14% 0 0% 8 7% $800,000 to $899, 000 1 17% 3 3% 0 0% 1 7% 1 14% 4 3% $900, 000 to $999,999 0 0% 8 8% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 8 7% $1,000,000 and over 0 0% 58 57% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 58 50% Total 6 100% 101 100% 1 100% 14 100% 7 100% 115 100% Sources: Zillow; Realtor.com; RE/MAX; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Active Listings (Residential Properties) Orono, November 2017. $1,000,000 and over $900,000 to $999,999 t $800,000 to $899,000 $700,000 to $799,000 o $600,000 to $699,000 u $500,000 to $599,000 $400,000 to $499,999 $300,000 to $399,999 $200,000 to $299,999 ■ $100,000 to $199,999 $99,999 0 10 2�_ 30 COU [It New For -Sale Housing Projects December 19, 2017 Page 29 Table 15 presents active and pending for -sale new construction single family homes in Orono as of mid-November 2017. % �® t1 • A total of 39 new construction projects were identified as actively listed for -sale in Orono. • The largest percentage (54%) of single family homes in Orono were listed for over $1,000,000 with no active or pending new construction homes listed for under $400,000. • The median price per square foot (PSF) of a new single-family home in Orono is $253 PSF; compared to $210 PSF for a for -sale multifamily home (twinhome or detached townhome). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. TABLE 15 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (ACTIVE ORONO AND PENDING) Cost Count Percent $400,000- $499,999 1 3% $500,000-$599,999 3 8% $600,000- $699,999 6 15% $700,000- $799,999 6 15% $800,000- $899,999 2 5% $900,000- $999,999 0 0% $1,000,000- $1,199,999 1 3% $1,200,000- $1,299,999 9 23% ZN $1,300,000- $1,399,999 2 5%/0 10 $1,400,000- $1,499,999 2 5 $1,500,000 + 7 18% Total 39 100% New Construction (Active and Pending) $1,.500,000 + $1,400,000- $1,499,999 $1,300,000- $1,399,999 $1,200,000- $1,299,999 $1,000,000-$1,199,999 o $900,000- $999,999 U $800,000- $899,999 $700,000- $799,999 $600,0100- $699,999 $500,000-$599,999 $400,000- $499,999 0 2 Count MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC December 19, 2017 Page 30 Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Selected Multifamily Housing Developments December 19, 2017 Page 31 Table 16 lists selected multifamily housing developments in Navarre and from other Lake Min- netonka area communities. Data comprises of both for sale and rental properties and includes the number of units and bedrooms and pricing. The following points summarize the current market for multifamily residential units in Navarre. • The for -sale units range in size from 850 square feet to 4,600 square feet, while the for - rent units range in size from 450 to 2,049 square feet. • Pricing for the for -sale condominium units is at the luxury end as prices range from $273,917 to over $3,500,000. Most of new condominium product is being developed in Downtown Wayzata with prices starting at $500,000 with most product selling for over $1,000,000. • Pricing for the for -rent units ranges from $750 per month for a studio to $3,575 per month for a two-bedroom unit. • Besides The Mist on Lake Minnetonka which was built in 2007, all the other for -rent pro- jects predate 2000. The for -sale units were all built after 2000. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 16 SELECTED MULTIFAMILY UNITS NAVARRE SURROUNDING AREA Yr. No. of 111111M �- Name Type Open Units Bedrooms Min - Max Min - Max Avg. The Landing Condos 2017 31 2-3 BR 1,220 - 4,600 $825,000 - $3,500,000 $719 815 Wayzata Blvd E; Wayzata Meyer Place at Ferndale Condos 2017 21 2-4BR 2,000 - 4,000 $1,290,000 - $2,399,000 $622 105 Lake St E; Wayzata The Regatta Condos 2015 59 1-2BR 850 - 4,000 $500,000 - $2,000,000 $544 801 Lake St E; Wayzata Lakeview Lofts Condos 2005 32 1-2BR 1,297 - 1,534 $273,917 - $380,202 $230 4100 Spring St; Spring Park The Mist on Lake Minnetonka Apartments 2007 121 1-2BR 1,260 2,049 N/A $3,575 N/A 4201 Sunset Dr; Spring Park Minnetonka Edgewater Apartments 1967 82 0-2BR 450 - 1,078 $875 $1,450 $1.64 4177 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park Bayview Apartments Apartments 1969 107 0-3BR 500 1,200 $750 - $1,500 $1.33 24001nterlachen Rd; Spring Park Parkshore Apartments Apartments 1984 92 1-2BR 643- 1,050 N/A N/A N/A 4601 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Selected Multifami December 19, 2017 Page 32 & Commercial Development The Mist on Lake Minnetonka VIN-WW""M The Regatta Lakeview Lofts The Landing - Hotel Senior Housing (� The term "senior housing" refers to any housing development that is restricted to persons age 55 or older. Today, senior housing includes a spectrum of housing alternatives, which occasion- ally overlap, thus making the differences somewhat ambiguous. However, the level of support services offered best distinguishes them. The following figure classifies senior housing projects into five categories based on the level of support services that are offered. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 33 Table 17 shows the inventory of existing market rate senior housing products in Navarre and the surrounding Lake Minnetonka communities that would be competitive with a new market rate senior housing development on the subject property. • As displayed in Table 17, five properties with a total of over 300 units were identified near the Orono area. • Four out of five projects offered assisted living care and only one out of the five projects offered solely adult/few services units. • Although there are no senior housing developments in Navarre, a large senior housing campus is located to the west in Spring Park (Lake Minnetonka Shores). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Continuum of Housing and Services for Seniors Single -Family Townhome or Congregate Apartments w/ Assisted Luing Nursing Facilities Age -Restricted Independent Single- Congregate Apartments Memory Care Family, Townhomes, Apartments, w/ Intensive Services (Alzheimer's and Condominiums, Cooperatives Dementia Units) Fully Fully or Highly Independent Dependent on Care Lifestyle Senior Housing Product Type Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Table 17 shows the inventory of existing market rate senior housing products in Navarre and the surrounding Lake Minnetonka communities that would be competitive with a new market rate senior housing development on the subject property. • As displayed in Table 17, five properties with a total of over 300 units were identified near the Orono area. • Four out of five projects offered assisted living care and only one out of the five projects offered solely adult/few services units. • Although there are no senior housing developments in Navarre, a large senior housing campus is located to the west in Spring Park (Lake Minnetonka Shores). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Home Apartment i Optional Services Age -Restricted Independent Single- Congregate Apartments Memory Care Family, Townhomes, Apartments, w/ Intensive Services (Alzheimer's and Condominiums, Cooperatives Dementia Units) Table 17 shows the inventory of existing market rate senior housing products in Navarre and the surrounding Lake Minnetonka communities that would be competitive with a new market rate senior housing development on the subject property. • As displayed in Table 17, five properties with a total of over 300 units were identified near the Orono area. • Four out of five projects offered assisted living care and only one out of the five projects offered solely adult/few services units. • Although there are no senior housing developments in Navarre, a large senior housing campus is located to the west in Spring Park (Lake Minnetonka Shores). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 34 TABLE 17 SELECTED SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS NAVARRE SURROUNDING AREA NOVEMBER 2017 Number Project/ Address Year Built of Units Services Presbyterian Homes and Services 2013 254 Adult/ (Folkestone) Few Services/ 100 Promenade Ave; Wayzata Assisted Living/ Memory Care Trails of Orono 2012 76 Assisted Living/ 875 Wayzata Blvd; Wayzata Memory Care Orono Woods Senior Apartments 2002 62 Adult/ 2040 Wayzata Blvd; Long Lake Few Services Long Lake Assisted Living LLC 2005 N/A !it Assisted Living/ 345 North Brown Rd; Long LakeHousing With 01_ Services Sojourn Suites LLC 1984 2-7 per Assisted Living/ 3645 Lyric Ave; Navarre, location Housing With (8 locations total) Services/ Memory Care Presbyterian Homes and Services X78 131 Adult/ (Lake Minnetonka Shores) Few Services/ 4527 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park Assisted Living/ Memory Care Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Selected Senior Housing Developments qwpw-._ — Folkestone MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Presbyterian Homes- Lake Minnetonka Shores Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 35 Trails of Orono Consumer Expenditure Patterns Long Lake Assisted Living Table 18 shows estimated consumer expenditures and average expenditures per households for retail goods and services in Navarre and Orono compared to all of Hennepin County in 2017. Data was obtained from ESRI based on Consumer Expenditure Surveys from the Bureau of La- bor Statistics. V The table shows the average expenditures per household in the Market Area by product or ser- vice. The average expenditure reflects the average amount spent per household, while the total expenditure reflects the aggregate amount spent by all households. In addition, a Spending Po- tential Index (SPI) is illustrated for comparison purposes. The SPI is based on households and represents the annual expenditures for a product or service relative to the national average which is given a benchmark index of 100. An SPI of 115 indicates that the average annual ex- penditure by local consumers is 15% above the national average. Two-thirds of the national economy is driven by consumer spending. Consumer spending is in- fluenced by market conditions and trends. In times of economic troubles, market conditions drive spending patterns toward convenience and necessities, whereas in times of a booming economy consumer trends feature opportunity and luxury items. During the most recent reces- sion, when the housing market began its decline in late 2006 into 2007, consumer spending and consumer confidence followed. Households decreased spending, increased savings, and re- duced credit card debt as many households were faced with job losses. As the nation exited the recession, consumers gained confidence and spending gradually recov- ered. Consumer confidence continues to grow suggesting economic growth with higher con- sumption. The following are key points from the household expenditures table. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 36 • Overall, Navarre residents will spend an estimated $6.9 million on retail goods and ser- vices in 2017, excluding housing, finance/insurance, and travel expenditures, as well as vehicle purchases. • Average annual expenditures (excluding the categories mentioned above) are estimated to be $38,538 per household in Navarre. This compares to an average of $27,506 per household for Hennepin County. • As reflected in the SPI, expenditures by Navarre and Orono households are higher than the Hennepin County average in every product and service category. • Among the retail categories, Market Area spending was greatest for Food at Home (i.e. groceries) at an average of $8,353 per household in Navarre compared to $6,052 per household in Hennepin County. • Spending was also high for Food Away from Home ($5,693 per Navarre household) and Entertainment and Recreation goods and services ($5,375 per household in Navarre). MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 37 Goods & Services TABLE 19 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES BY SELECTED PRODUCT TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA Index Apparel & Services 2017 $3,715 Navarre Annual Expenditures Orono City Expenditures Hennepin Spending Potential Index to USA County Expenditures Total Average Average Average $941 $5,375 Hennepin Category ($000's) Per HH Per HH Per HH Navarre Orono City County Goods & Services IIndex Index Index Index Apparel & Services $650 $3,715 $5,299 $2,674 172 245 124 Entertainment and Recreation $941 $5,375 $7,662 $3,749 172 246 120 Nonprescription Drugs $38 $215 $292 $148 168 229 116 Prescription Drugs $113 $646 $869 $434 166 224 112 Eye Glasses & Contact Lenses $29 $163 $229 $111 173 243 117 Personal Care Products $141 $804 $1,097 $574 (-. 71 233 122 Child Care $145 $826 $1,235 $609 172 258 127 School Books & Supplies $46 $263 $369 $195 170 239 126 Smoking Products $110 $631 $706 $472 152 170 113 Computer Hardware $53 $304 $429 $220 ' 176 248 127 Computer Software $4 $20 $29 $15 176 251 132 Pets $178 $1,017 $1,408 $682 171 236 114 Food IIndex Index Index Food at Home $1,462 $8,354 $11,114 $6,052 166 221 120 Food Away from Home $996 $5,693 $7,818 $4,121 171 235 124 Alcoholic Beverages $173 $990 $1,423 $705 178 256 127 Home IIndex Index Index Index Home Mortgage Payment/Rent $2,726 $15,574 $24,766 $9,967 181 287 116 Maintenance& Remodeling Services $622 $3,557 $5,845 $2,218 183 301 114 Maintenance& Remodeling Material $121 $689 $1,138 $433 170 281 107 Utilities $1,456 $8,317 $11,246 $5,898 165 223 117 Household Furnishings, Equipment, & Operations Index F Index Household Textiles $29 $167 $240 $118 175 252 124 Furniture $174 $995 $1,400 $711 174 245 124 Rugs $8 $43 $69 $29 185 299 125 Major Appliances $96 $549 $772 $363 171 241 113 Small Appliances $15 $83 $113 $60 172 233 124 Housewares $29 $163 $222 $114 172 234 120 Luggage $4 $22 $35 $15 181 292 128 Telephone & Accessories $21 $118 $151 $86 171 218 125 Lawn & Garden $129 $739 $1,113 $469 176 265 112 Moving/Storage/Freight Express $19 $111 $143 $86 174 223 134 Hous ekeepingSupplies $209 $1,195 $1,610 $842 168 226 118 Financial & Insurance Index Index Index Investments $2,069 $11,825 $20,817 $7,512 191 336 121 Vehicle Loans $775 $4,430 $5,684 $3,156 163 209 116 Owners & Renters Insurance $156 $889 $1,298 $569 172 251 110 Vehicle Insurance $345 $1,973 $2,671 $1,408 168 227 120 Life/Other Insurance $134 $764 $1,232 $495 179 288 116 Health Insurance $1,089 $6,225 $8,733 $4,237 170 239 116 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 38 Retail Demand Potential and Leakage Tables 20 through 24 on the following pages present current retail sales and consumer expendi- ture data for Block Groups 27053072031 and 27053072032; Orono; Hennepin County; and a 5 - mile radius around Navarre. Due to ESRI data limitations, information could not be provided for the Navarre site area and instead the two block groups closest to the site were analyzed (see map on the following page). The sales information is from ESRI based on household counts. This information lists retail demand (potential sales), retail supply to consumers (retail sales) and provides a picture of the gap between the area's retail supply and demand. A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity to stores outside of the Market Area. A negative value represents a "surplus," where more customers are coming into the area for retail goods and services than there are households in the area. • As depicted in the tables and illustrated in the following graphs, leakages exist in most retail industry segments in both Navarre and Orono. For the Navarre area block groups, MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 19 CONTINUED ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES BY SELECTED PRODUCT TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2017 Navarre Annual Orono City Hennepin Spending Potential Index to USA County Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Total Average Average Average Hennepin Category ($000-s) Per HH Per HH Per HH Navarre Orono City County Transportation Index Index Index Cars and Trucks (Net Outlay) $656 $3,746 $4,893 $2,635 167 218 117 Gasoline and Motor Oil $794 $4,535 $5,917 $3,257 164 213 117 Vehicle Maintenance/Repair $318 $1,818 $2,515 $1,276 170 235 119 Travel IIndex Index Index Airline Fares $163 $933 $1,501 $645 183 295 127 Lodging $167 $951 $1,500 $634 182 286 121 Vehicle Rental $8 $48 $75 $32 182 282 123 Food &Drink on Trips $155 $888 $1,358 $600 180 275 122 Average Annual Household Expenditures Summary Goods & Services $2,446 $12,962 $18,217 $9,202 Food $2,631 $15,036 $20,354 ` $10,878 Home $4,924 $28,138 $42,995 $18,517 Household $733 $4,186 $5,868 Wit $2,893 Financial and Insurance $4,569 $26,106 $40,436 $17,376 Transportation $1,767 $10,099 $13,325 $7,168 Travel $494 $2,821 $4,434 $1,910 Total $17,564 $99,349 $145,627 $67,944 Note: The Spending Potential Index is based on households and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to the national average of 100. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Retail Demand Potential and Leakage Tables 20 through 24 on the following pages present current retail sales and consumer expendi- ture data for Block Groups 27053072031 and 27053072032; Orono; Hennepin County; and a 5 - mile radius around Navarre. Due to ESRI data limitations, information could not be provided for the Navarre site area and instead the two block groups closest to the site were analyzed (see map on the following page). The sales information is from ESRI based on household counts. This information lists retail demand (potential sales), retail supply to consumers (retail sales) and provides a picture of the gap between the area's retail supply and demand. A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity to stores outside of the Market Area. A negative value represents a "surplus," where more customers are coming into the area for retail goods and services than there are households in the area. • As depicted in the tables and illustrated in the following graphs, leakages exist in most retail industry segments in both Navarre and Orono. For the Navarre area block groups, MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 39 the total Retail Trade industry (including Food and Drink) experienced a $46.5 million sales leakage in 2017, while Orono experienced a $209.8 million sales leakage. • There is high leakage in Orono and from within the three- and five -mile radius of Na- varre. This suggests the Navarre area is under retailed and could support new commer- cial development. Navarre Site Block Groups e MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Surplus/Leakage by Retail Category (Block Groups) Total (Retail + Food & Drink) Food Services & Drinking Places Nonstore Retailers Miscellaneous Retailers General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby... Clothing and Accessories... Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage Bldg Materials, Garden Equip... Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Furnishings Motor Vehicle & Parts... -1 Surplus/Leak Total (Retail + Food & Drink) Food Services & Drinking Places hlonstore Retailers Miscellaneous Retailers General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby... Clothing and Accessories... Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage Bldg Materials, Garden Equip... Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Furnishings Motor Vehicle & Parts... December 19, 2017 Page 40 —surplus -,`leakage 01 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 ----surplus---- MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC ------leakage------ Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 41 Surplus/Leakage by Retail Category (Navarre 3 -Mole Radius) Total (Retail + Food & Drink) Food Services & Drinking Places Nonstore Retailers Miscellaneous Retailers General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby... Clothing and Accessories... Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage Bldg Materials, Garden Equip... Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Furnishings Motor Vehicle & Parts... -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 —surplus— —'V_ leakage------ Surplus/Leakage by Retail Category (Navarre 5 -Mile Radius) Total (Retail + Food & Drink) Food Services & Drinking Places Nonstore Retailers Miscellaneous Retailers General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby... Clothing and Accessories... Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage Bldg Materials, Garden Equip... Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Furnishings Motor Vehicle & Parts... -100 -75 -50 -25 0 ----surplus--- MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 25 50 75 100 -----leakage----- Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 42 Surplus/Leakage by Retail Category (Hennepin County) Total (Retail + Food & Drink) Food Services & Drinking Places Nonstore Retailers Miscellaneous Retailers General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby... Clothing and Accessories... Gasoline Stations Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage Bldg Materials, Garden Equip... Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Furnishings Motor Vehicle & Parts... -1 ----surplus---- *L ------leakage------ MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC M Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 43 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 20 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE BLOCK GROUPS 27053072031 AND 27053072032 2017 Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code) (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) (Demand - Supply) Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722) $83,246,161 $36,712,858 $46,533,303 38.8 24 Total Retail Trade (NAI C544-45) $74,923,922 $31,455,599 $43,468,323 40.9 18 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722) $8,322,239 EXPENDITURE $5,257,259 TYPE $3,064,980 22.6 6 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $15,332,266 $4,274,957 $11,057,309 56.4 5 AutomobileDeaIers $12,220,953 $0 $12,220,953 100.0 0 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $1,736,499 $0 $1,736,499 100.0 0 Auto Parts, Accessories &Tire Stores $1,374,814 $4,274,957 ($2,900,143) (51.3) 5 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $2,433,512 $938,640 $1,494,872 44.3 1 Furniture Stores $1,446,739 $0 $1,446,739 100.0 0 Home Furnishings Stores $986,773 $938,640 $48,133 2.5 1 Electronics & Appliance Stores $2,864,604 $0 $2,864,604 100.0 0 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $5,412,792 $3,223,242 $2,189,550 25.4 3 Bldg Material&Supplies Dealers $4,894,588 $3,223,242 $1,671,346 20.6 3 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $518,204 $0 $518,204 100.0 0 Food & Beverage Stores $11,791,677 $13,854,42,062,798) (8.0) 2 Grocery Stores $9,646,239 $13,36 3 3,721,796) (16.2) 1 Specialty Food Stores $596,215 <+$0 $596,215 100.0 0 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $1,549,223 a $486,44 $1,062,783 52.2 1 Health & Personal Care Stores $5,225,483 $,0 $5,225,483 100.0 0 Gasoline Stations $7,998,282 $7,625,12 $372,670 2.4 2 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $4,167,426 $0 $4,167,426 100.0 0 Clothi ng Stores $2,807,837 $0 $2,807,837 100.0 0 Shoe Stores $576,622 $0 $576,622 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $782,967 $0 $782,967 100.0 0 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $2,352,042 $354,365 $1,997,677 73.8 1 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical InstrStores $2,043,401 $354,365 $1,689,036 70.4 1 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $308,641 $0 $308,641 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $13,233,944 $708,161 $12,525,783 89.8 1 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts. $9,975,419 $0 $9,975,419 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores $3,258,525 $708,161 $2,550,364 64.3 1 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $2,875,558 $228,135 $2,647,423 85.3 2 Florists i $168,075 $95,461 $72,614 27.6 1 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $605,024 $0 $605,024 100.0 0 Used Merchandise Stores $375,089 $0 $375,089 100.0 0 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $1,727,370 $132,674 $1,594,696 85.7 1 Nonstore Retailers $1,236,336 $248,012 $988,324 66.6 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail -Order Houses $960,637 $0 $960,637 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $54,560 $0 $54,560 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $221,139 $248,012 ($26,873) (5.7) 1 Food Services & Drinking Places $8,322,239 $5,257,259 $3,064,980 22.6 6 Special Food Services $200,835 $227,460 ($26,625) (6.2) 1 Drinking Places- Alcoholic Beverages $508,937 $1,048,301 ($539,364) (34.6) 1 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $7,612,467 $3,981,498 $3,630,969 31.3 4 Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers ata retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from+100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positivevalue represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 44 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 21 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE NAVARRE 3 -MILE RADIUS 2017 Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code) (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) (Demand - Supply) Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722) $535,612,858 $172,168,743 $363,444,115 51.3 120 Total Retai I Trade (NAICS 44-45) $482,523,379 $133,891,510 $348,631,869 56.6 89 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722) $53,089,479 EXPENDITURE $38,277,232 TYPE $14,812,247 16.2 31 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $99,423,043 $23,897,095 $75,525,948 61.2 15 Automobi le Dealers $79,182,070 $2,050,214 $77,131,856 95.0 3 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $11,338,855 $16,703,910 ($5,365,055) (19.1) 6 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $8,902,118 $5,142,971 $3,759,147 26.8 6 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $15,746,253 $4,068,157 $11,678,096 58.9 6 Furniture Stores $9,240,709 $705,683 $8,535,026 85.8 1 Home Furnishings Stores $6,505,543 $3,362,474 $3,143,069 31.9 5 Electronics & Appliance Stores $18,233,322 $7,727,957 $10,505,365 40.5 6 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $36,688,185 $10,731,333 $25,956,852 54.7 9 Bldg Material&Supplies Dealers $33,012,711 $9,129,145 $23,883,566 56.7 8 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $3,675,474 $1,602,187 $2,073,287 39.3 1 Food & Beverage Stores $75,096,200 $36,591,107 $38,505,093 34.5 9 Grocery Stores $61,451,947 $29,157,128 $32,294,819 35.6 3 Specialty Food Stores $3,792,310 $445,514 $3,346,796 79.0 1 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $9,851,942 $6,988,465 $2,863,477 17.0 5 Health & Personal Care Stores $33,767,842 $7,834,775 $25,933,067 62.3 5 Gasoline Stations $50,957,027 $18,086,810 $32,870,217 47.6 5 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $26,545,442 $14,016,785 $12,528,657 30.9 10 Cl othi ng Stores $17,836,647 $5,358,116 $12,478,531 53.8 7 Shoe Stores $3,687,554 $0 $3,687,554 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $5,021,241 $8,658,669 ($3,637,428) (26.6) 3 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $14,934,881 $1,638,205 $13,296,676 80.2 3 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $12,986,768 $1,638,205 $11,348,563 77.6 3 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $1,948,113 $0 $1,948,113 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $84,610,381 $1,448,666 $83,161,715 96.6 3 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts. $63,775,567 $0 $63,775,567 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores �.-•� $20,834,815 $1,340,482 $19,494,333 87.9 2 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $18,422,426 $7,523,946 $10,898,480 42.0 17 Florists $1,228,539 $606,436 $622,103 33.9 2 Office Supplies, Stationary& Gift Stores �; $3,891,558 $3,026,738 $864,820 12.5 3 Used Merchandise Stores $2,366,857 $714,706 $1,652,151 53.6 3 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $10,935,473 $3,176,066 $7,759,407 55.0 8 Nonstore Retailers $8,098,379 $326,676 $7,771,703 92.2 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail -Order Houses $6,149,255 $0 $6,149,255 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $346,660 $0 $346,660 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $1,602,464 $248,012 $1,354,452 73.2 1 Food Services & Drinking Places $53,089,479 $38,277,232 $14,812,247 16.2 31 Special Food Services $1,337,609 $414,454 $923,155 52.7 2 Drinking Places -Alcoholic Beverages $3,310,413 $1,935,735 $1,374,678 26.2 2 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $48,441,457 $35,927,043 $12,514,414 14.8 27 Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates theexpected amoutspent by consumers ata retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from+100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positivevalue represents "leakage" of retai I opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 45 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 22 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE NAVARRE 5 -MILE RADIUS 2017 Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code) (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) (Demand - Supply) Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722) $1,465,161,877 $420,595,936 $1,044,565,941 55.4 309 Tota I Reta i I Trade (NAI CS 44-45) $1,319,383,170 $334,264,186 $985,118,984 59.6 233 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722) $145,778,708 EXPENDITURE $86,331,750 TYPE $59,446,958 25.6 76 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $273,031,317 $48,007,748 $225,023,569 70.1 25 AutomobileDeaIers $217,457,583 $7,977,305 $209,480,278 92.9 4 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $31,302,300 $33,208,460 ($1,906,160) (3.0) 12 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $24,271,434 $6,821,983 $17,449,451 56.1 9 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $43,421,622 $11,715,267 $31,706,355 57.5 15 Furniture Stores $25,407,690 $996,344 $24,411,346 92.5 2 Home Furnishings Stores $18,013,933 $10,718,923 $7,295,010 25.4 13 Electronics & Appliance Stores $49,869,939 $17,626,389 $32,243,550 47.8 15 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $101,657,303 $31,946,126 $69,711,177 52.2 28 Bldg Material&Supplies Dealers $91,455,405 $24,836,604 $66,618,801 57.3 22 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $10,201,898 $7,109,522 $3,092,376 17.9 6 Food & Beverage Stores $203,992,841 $71,428,021 $132,564,820 48.1 23 Grocery Stores $166,772,659 $51,905,277 $114,867,382 52.5 8 Specialty Food Stores $10,286,259 $2,154,202 $8,132,057 65.4 4 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $26,933,923 $17,368,543 $9,565,380 21.6 11 Health & Personal Care Stores $91,628,133 $22,411,233 $69,216,900 60.7 12 Gasoline Stations $138,114,753 $48,440,917 $89,673,836 48.1 12 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $72,910,482 $28,807,127 $44,103,355 43.4 31 Cl othi ng Stores $48,930,743 $15,583,803 $33,346,940 51.7 22 Shoe Stores $10,193,797 $0 $10,193,797 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $13,785,942 $13,191,567 $594,375 2.2 9 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $41,017,804 $10,807,870 $30,209,934 58.3 12 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $35,693,853 $9,021,925 $26,671,928 59.6 10 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $5,323,950 $1,785,946 $3,538,004 49.8 1 General Merchandise Stores $231,338,399 $15,872,083 $215,466,316 87.2 10 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts. $174,570,783 $9,654,682 $164,916,101 89.5 1 Other General Merchandise Stores v Miscellaneous Store Retailers N $56,767,617 $50,280,409 $6,217,401 $25,083,031 $50,550,216 $25,197,378 80.3 33.4 8 47 Florists $3,459,149 $914,561 $2,544,588 58.2 4 Office Supplies, Stationary& GiftSts $10,669,342 $9,460,044 $1,209,298 6.0 12 Used Merchandise Stores $6,484,743 $1,967,103 $4,517,640 53.5 7 Other Miscellaneous Stor Q0,ses; $29,667,175 $12,741,323 $16,925,852 39.9 23 Nonstore Retailers $22,120,166 $2,118,375 $20,001,791 82.5 4 Electronic Shopping&Mail $16,870,797 $1,246,433 $15,624,364 86.2 1 Vending Machine Operators $942,008 $230,841 $711,167 60.6 1 Direct Selling Establishments $4,307,361 $641,100 $3,666,261 74.1 2 Food Services & Drinking Places $145,778,708 $86,331,750 $59,446,958 25.6 76 Special Food Services $3,728,365 $949,922 $2,778,443 59.4 5 Drinking Places -Alcoholic Beverages $9,107,936 $3,564,223 $5,543,713 43.7 3 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $132,942,406 $81,817,605 $51,124,801 23.8 68 Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates theexpected amoutspent by consumers ata retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from+100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positivevalue represents "leakage" of retai I opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 46 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 23 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE ORONO CITY 2017 Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code) (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) (Demand - Supply) Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722) $273,377,507 $63,595,140 $209,782,367 62.3 39 Tota I Reta i I Tra de (NAI CS 44-45) $245,936,678 $59,162,800 $186,773,878 61.2 33 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722) $27,440,829 EXPENDITURE $4,432,340 TYPE $23,008,489 72.2 6 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $50,578,889 $21,468,058 $29,110,831 40.4 7 AutomobileDeaIers $40,231,314 $1,378,783 $38,852,531 93.4 1 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $5,803,044 $16,354,747 ($10,551,703) (47.6) 2 Auto Parts, Accessories &Tire Stores $4,544,531 $3,734,528 $810,003 9.8 4 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $8,166,792 $3,353,614 $4,813,178 41.8 2 Furniture Stores $4,761,449 $0 $4,761,449 100.0 0 Home Furnishings Stores $3,405,343 $3,353,614 $51,729 0.8 2 Electronics & Appliance Stores $9,444,296 $3,201,648 $6,242,648 49.4 3 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $19,381,412 $6,201,401 $13,180,011 51.5 5 Bldg Material&Supplies Dealers $17,380,098 $4,781,741 $12,598,357 56.8 4 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $2,001,314 $1,419,660 $581,654 17.0 1 Food & Beverage Stores $37,825,732 $14,968,478 $22,857,254 43.3 3 Grocery Stores $30,734,280 $14,48038 i $16,252,242 35.9 2 Specialty Food Stores $1,894,083 $$1,894,083 100.0 0 Beer, Wine &Liquor Stores $5,197,369 $\.V $4,710,929 82.9 1 Health & Personal Care Stores $17,043,7870 $17,043,787 100.0 0 Gasoline Stations $25,217,387 6 $18,937,471 60.1 2 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $13,882,519 $0 $13,882,519 100.0 0 Cl othi ng Stores $9,254,983 $0 $9,254,983 100.0 0 Shoe Stores $1,891,861 $0 $1,891,861 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $2,735,675 $0 $2,735,675 100.0 0 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $7,694,959 $1,561,511 $6,133,448 66.3 3 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $6,689,415 $1,561,511 $5,127,904 62.1 3 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $1,005,544 $0 $1,005,544 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $43,125,150 $850,552 $42,274,598 96.1 2 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts. $32,641,652 $0 $32,641,652 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores s, $10,483,498 $850,552 $9,632,946 85.0 2 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $9,361,046 $1,029,610 $8,331,436 80.2 5 Florists $710,279 $364,997 $345,282 32.1 2 OfficeSupplies, Stab onary&Gift Stores $2,001,624 $290,005 $1,711,619 74.7 1 Used Merchandise Stores $1,215,961 $0 $1,215,961 100.0 0 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $5,433,182 $374,608 $5,058,574 87.1 2 Nonstore Retailers $4,214,709 $248,012 $3,966,697 88.9 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail -Order Houses $3,185,449 $0 $3,185,449 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $173,941 $0 $173,941 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $855,319 $248,012 $607,307 55.0 1 Food Services & Drinking Places $27,440,829 $4,432,340 $23,008,489 72.2 6 Special Food Services $691,993 $225,549 $466,444 50.8 1 Drinking Places- Alcoholic Beverages $1,778,415 $863,307 $915,108 34.6 1 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $24,970,421 $3,343,484 $21,626,937 76.4 4 Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates theexpected amoutspent by consumers ata retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from+100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positivevalue represents "leakage" of retai I opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 47 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 24 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code) (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) (Demand - Supply) Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722) $23,168,709,937 $24,969,872,273 ($1,801,162,336) (3.7) 9,278 Tota I Reta i I Tra de (NAI CS 44-45) $20,858,232,830 $22,157,297,456 ($1,299,064,626) (3.0) 6,390 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722) $2,310,477,107 EXPENDITURE $2,812,574,817 TYPE ($502,097,710) (9.8) 2,888 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $4,308,548,701 $4,935,215,848 ($626,667,147) (6.8) 494 Automobi le Dea I ers $3,446,131,266 $4,381,372,658 ($935,241,392) (11.9) 192 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $481,691,364 $241,203,595 $240,487,769 33.3 89 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $380,726,071 $312,639,595 $68,086,476 9.8 213 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $671,176,633 $973,802,560 ($302,625,927) (18.4) 372 Furniture Stores $404,679,267 $719,995,929 ($315,316,662) (28.0) 162 Home Furnishings Stores $266,497,366 $253,806,631 $12,690,735 2.4 210 Electronics & Appliance Stores $779,650,061 $1,050,461,363 ($270,811,302) (14.8) 423 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $1,467,246,241 $1,520,171,215 ($52,924,974) (1.8) 557 Bldg Material&Supplies Dealers $1,324,440,594 $1,439,612,015 ($115,171,421) (4.2) 476 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $142,805,647 $80,559,200 $62,246,447 27.9 81 Food & Beverage Stores $3,305,974,043 $3,075,748,654 $230,225,389 3.6 745 Grocery Stores $2,719,393,786 $2,448,193,873 $271,199,913 5.2 361 Specialty Food Stores $168,265,811 $171,408,676 ($3,142,865) (0.9) 187 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $418,314,446 $456,146,105 ($37,831,659) (4.3) 197 Health & Personal Care Stores $1,444,064,248 $1,457,795,870 ($13,731,622) (0.5) 511 Gasoline Stations $2,267,501,559 $1,113,835,678 $1,153,665,881 34.1 247 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $1,142,973,158 $1,663,179,726 ($520,206,568) (18.5) 1,060 Cl othi ng Stores $774,154,614 $1,257,723,092 ($483,568,478) (23.8) 725 Shoe Stores $161,601,699 $177,000,222 ($15,398,523) (4.5) 120 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $207,216,845 $228,456,412 ($21,239,567) (4.9) 215 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $647,455,533 $812,335,807 ($164,880,274) (11.3) 531 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $561,028,522 $691,618,003 ($130,589,481) (10.4) 438 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $86,427,011 $120,717,804 ($34,290,793) (16.6) 93 General Merchandise Stores $3,683,528,480 $3,118,258,947 $565,269,533 8.3 300 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts. $2,768,054,392 $2,128,058,707 $639,995,685 13.1 103 Other General Merchandise Storess $915,474,088 Miscellaneous Store Retailers .. $799,727,609 $990,200,240 $848,126,062 ($74,726,152) ($48,398,453) (3.9) (2.9) 197 998 Florists $45,527,447 $63,012,000 ($17,484,553) (16.1) 107 Office Supplies,Stationary&Gift Sts $167,282,748 $177,651,900 ($10,369,152) (3.0) 265 Used Merchandise Stores $104,884,138 $121,419,040 ($16,534,902) (7.3) 163 Other Miscellaneous Stor Do'ses $482,033,276 $486,043,122 ($4,009,846) (0.4) 463 Nonstore Retailers $340,386,564 $1,588,365,726 ($1,247,979,162) (64.7) 152 Electronic Shopping&Mail- $264,788,750 $1,542,255,474 ($1,277,466,724) (70.7) 95 Vending Machine Operators $15,365,586 $18,042,785 ($2,677,199) (8.0) 19 Direct Selling Establishments $60,232,228 $28,067,467 $32,164,761 36.4 38 Food Services & Drinking Places $2,310,477,107 $2,812,574,817 ($502,097,710) (9.8) 2,888 Special Food Services $57,042,060 $85,543,664 ($28,501,604) (20.0) 94 Drinking Places -Alcoholic Beverages $138,339,841 $116,543,152 $21,796,689 8.6 127 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $2,115,095,206 $2,610,488,001 ($495,392,795) (10.5) 2,667 Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates theexpected amoutspent by consumers ata retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from+100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positivevalue represents "leakage" of retai I opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Selected Available Office Space December 19, 2017 Page 48 Table 25 presents office space that is currently available for lease as of mid-November 2017 in the communities surrounding Navarre including properties in Long Lake, Mound, Orono, Shore- wood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. A total of 26 properties available for lease were identified. • The selected properties range in lease rate from $10.03 Net to $45.00 NNN. • A majority (18/26) of the properties are in Wayzata and none are within Navarre. • The space available in the properties ranges from 150 square feet to 160,000 square feet. N"�-G • Metro -wide, the office market continues to be soft with vacancies averaging between 15% and 18% in the Twin Cities. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. TABLE 25 SELECTED AVAILABLE OFFICE SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE $13.33 FSG Ye Yea Property Name/ Address City Bui 1850 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake 19 1850 Wayzata Blvd Minimum Maximum 432 Mill St Long Lake 19 432 Mill St SF 7,500 2350 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake 19 2350 Wayzata Blvd 576 5,576 Freshwater Building Orono 19 2500 Shadywood Rd 980 51,149 Casco Run Orono 19 3701 Shoreline Dr 1,000 1,000 Orono Medical & Dental Center Orono 20 2765 Kelley Pkwy 2,477 26,036 South Lake Office Building Shorewood 2 23505 Smithtown Rd 200 7,112 Tonka Business Center Spring Park 19 4154Shoreline Dr 6,854 24,024 Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 5 Wayzata 19 1001 Twelve Oaks Center Or 195 1,825 Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 4 Wayzata 19 901 Twelve Oaks Center Dr 4,040 35,000 Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 1 Wayzata 19 600 Twelve Oaks Center Dr 299 496 Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 2 Wayzata 19 700Twelve Oaks Center Dr 8,639 37,806 Wayzata Crossings Wayzata 19 1415 E Wayzata Blvd 150 150 Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 3 Wayzata 19 801 Twelve Oaks Ctr 10,648 A 16,000 Wayzata Executive Park Bldg 3 Wayzata 20 1907 Wayzata Blvd 192 192 Wayzata Executive Park Bldg 2 Wayzata 20 1905 Wayzata Blvd 6,330 25,000 Arne Professional Building Wayzata 19 101 W Lake St 2,466 2,466 100 West Lake Wayzata 19 100 Lake St 11,971 28,000 Wayzata Specialty Center Wayzata N/ 1120 E Wayzata Blvd 1,895 1,895 Wayzata Marquee Place Wayzata 19 641 Lake St 445 Lake St E Wayzata 19 445 Lake St E 701 Building Wayzata 20 701 Lake St 201 Lake Street-Westway Building Wayzata 19 201 Lake St 326-332 Broadway Ave Wayzata N/ 326 Broadway Ave 315 Lake St E Wayzata 2 315 Lake St Piper Jaffray Building Wayzata 19 319 Barry Ave Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 05 37 90 74 82 03 007 53 78 78 79 77 70 78 01 Ol 96 97 87 88 04 97 009 88 $13.33 FSG N/A $20.83 Gross N/A Negotiable 6,368 $17.50 Gross 1,000 Minimum Maximum Available It Bldg Size Divisible Contiguous SF 7,500 130 275 275 1,728 576 5,576 576 18,000 200 480 980 51,149 295 2,013 6,368 6,474 1,000 1,000 1,000 16,800 2,477 2,477 2,477 26,036 330 673 1,003 142,156 200 7,112 7,112 24,024 732 1,756 6,854 24,024 261 1,500 6,355 23,266 195 1,825 6,841 23,220 209 1,758 4,040 35,000 840 7,000 7,840 24,024 299 496 1,135 42,110 1,910 5,168 8,639 37,806 5,979 5,979 5,979 9,316 150 150 150 12,000 6,355 10,648 10,648 A 16,000 1,500 16,000 16,000 56,000 192 192 192 37,710 3,000 6,330 6,330 25,000 3,005 3,005 3,005 33,220 2,466 2,466 2,466 A 17,899 2,420 6,541 11,971 28,000 2,055 2,055 2,055 29,754 1,895 1,895 1,895 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC December 19, 2017 Page 49 Vacancy Lease Rate N/A $13.33 FSG N/A $20.83 Gross N/A Negotiable 6,368 $17.50 Gross 1,000 $20.00 Gross 2,477 $20.00 N N N 1,003 $27.61- $27.64 Gross 0 $10.50 NNN 5,098 $10.03 - $12.53 Net 6,355 $10.03 - $15.00 Net 5,793 $11.03 - $15.70 Net 3,437 $11.25 - $13.80 Net 7,000 $12.00- $17.00 Net 1,135 $12.53 Net 6,729 $16.00 NNN 5,979 $16.00 NNN 150 $24.00 N N N 0 $30.00 Net 16,000 $30.00 N N N 192 $35.00 Gross 0 $40.00 - $45.00 N N N 3,005 $48.00 Gross 2,466 Negotiable 11,971 Negotiable 0 Negotiable NNN 1,895 Negotiable NNN Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 50 Selected Available Retail Space Table 27 presents retail space that is currently available for lease as of mid-November 2017 in the area outside Navarre including properties in Long Lake, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. A total of 18 properties available for lease were identified. • The selected properties range in lease rate from $12.00 Net to $40.00 Net. • A majority (8/18) of the properties are in Wayzata and none are within Navarre. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 26 SELECTED AVAILABLE OFFICE SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE Number of Properties Average Average City Available For Lease Bldg Size Available SF Lease Rates Long Lake 3 9,076 610 $13.33 FSG - $20.83 Gross Mound 0 N/A N/A N/A Orono 3 24,807 3,281 $17.50 Gross - $20.00 NNN Shorewood 1 26,036 1,003 $27.61 Gross - $27.64 Gross Spring Park 1 142,156 7,112 $10.50 NNN Tonka Bay 0 N/A N/A N/A Wayzata 18 27,687 5,689 $10.03 Net- $45.00 NNN Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Selected Available Retail Space Table 27 presents retail space that is currently available for lease as of mid-November 2017 in the area outside Navarre including properties in Long Lake, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. A total of 18 properties available for lease were identified. • The selected properties range in lease rate from $12.00 Net to $40.00 Net. • A majority (8/18) of the properties are in Wayzata and none are within Navarre. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 51 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 27 SELECTED FOR LEASE RETAIL SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE Gross Operating Bldg Land Year Minimum Maximum Available Expenses/S Tax Property Name/ Address City Specific Use Size Area Built Tenancy Divisible Contiguous SF Vacancy Lease Rate Taxes/SF F Year 2073AWayzata Blvd Long Lake Freestanding 2,587 98,446 2005 Single -Tenant 1,000 2,587 2,587 2,587 $12.00-$20.00 NNN $5.28 $5.55 2016 2073 W Wayzata Blvd Mound Marketplace Mound Neighborhood Ctr 52,879 270,407 2003 Multi -Tenant 1,597 2,985 6,580 6,580 $18.00 - $22.00 Net $4.95 $3.90 2017 2131 Commerce Blvd Commerce Place - Retail Mound Conv/Strip Ctr 40,053 14,375 1986 Multi -Tenant 839 17,504 28,789 28,789 $8.00 - $18.00 Net $1.77 $2.98 2017 2200 Commerce Blvd Shorewood Village Center Shorewood Neighborhood Ctr 62,308 286,189 1975 Multi -Tenant 1,419 3,393 6,435 6,435 Negotiable NNN $4.71 $6.49 2017 23470 Highway Waterford Center Shorewood Conv/Strip Ctr 22,930 147,233 1994 Multi -Tenant 1,500 5,706 7,206 7,206 $16.50 NNN N/A $7.23 2016 19905 Highway Marina Center Spring Park Conv/Strip Ctr 47,135 507,038 1964 Multi -Tenant 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 $12.00 Net $3.85 $2.12 2016 4669 Shoreline Dr Lakeview Lofts Spring Park Neighborhood Ctr 60,000 24,019 2005 Multi -Tenant 3,964 3,964 3,964 3,964 $23.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A 4100 Spring St Marina Center- Pad Site Spring Park Freestanding 9,120 87,120 N/A Multi -Tenant 1,680 9,120 9,120 9,120 Negotiable N/A N/A N/A 4659 Shoreline Dr Tonka Village Shopping Center Tonka Bay Neighborhood Ctr 25,000 273,992 N/A Single -Tenant 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Negotiable NNN $3.45 $4.04 2017 24324 Smithtown Rd Tonka Village Shopping Center Tonka Bay Neighborhood Ctr 37,126 283,140 1959 Multi -Tenant 1,823 7,441 9,264 9,264 Negotiable NNN $3.45 $4.04 2017 5609 Manitou Rd Wayzata Marquee Place Wayzata Mixed Use 72,000 24,394 1946 Multi -Tenant 600 1,289 1,889 1,889 $25.00 NNN $12.00 $8.68 2017 603 Lake St E 1330 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata General 4,500 29,621 N/A Multi -Tenant 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 $40.00 Net $3.00 $7.00 2017 1330 Wayzata Blvd 240 Minnetonka Unit 103 Wayzata Other 1,094 N/A N/A Single -Tenant 1,094 1,094 1,094 1,094 $25.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A 240 Minnetonka The Promenade of Wayzata Wayzata Community Ctr 108,739 632,491 2014 Multi -Tenant 984 20,588 65,665 65,665 Negotiable NNN $11.72 $4.69 2017 801 E Lake St Wayzata Village Shoppes Wayzata Neighborhood Ctr 43,127 119,790 1964 Multi -Tenant 1,215 Lais 1,215 1,215 Negotiable NNN $7.29 $4.25 2017 812 Lake St 240 Minnetonka Unit 102 Wayzata Other 734 25,000 N/A Multi -Tenant 734 734 734 734 $25.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A 240 Minnetonka Ave S Colonial Square Shopping Center Wayzata Neighborhood 38 325,393 1959 Multi -Tenant 1,313 1,313 1,313 1,313 Negotiable NNN $8.85 $3.69 2017 1125 Wayzata Blvd Cross Creek Shoppes Wayzata General 10,145 28,314 1968 Multi -Tenant 1,239 2,994 4,233 4,233 Negotiable NNN N/A $16.00 2017 748 E Lake St Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Conclusions December 19, 2017 Page 52 The impetus for this study was to complete a high-level initial analysis of the future develop- ment potential in Navarre. Previous sections examined the demographic, economic, and mar- ket performance of various real estate uses in the Navarre area. This section summarizes the market potential findings and makes recommendations on the most appropriate product types that may be captured in Navarre. Potential Redevelopment Sites Maxfield Research & Consulting, together with WSB, identified potential areas is Navarre that could support redevelopment. Table 28 identifies parcels of interest sorted into seven poten- tial redevelopment areas. The table shows the parcel address and PID, owner, acreage, land use, last date of sale (if applicable), and current market values and property taxes. The redevel- opment areas range in size from 1.86 acres up to 6.78 acres. The following summarizes the re- development sites and the potential land uses that could result. • Site #1: The first site is the western -most site in Navarre located just north of Shoreline Drive and south of the 6.4 -acre Hennepin County property. This redevelopment consists of five parcels that comprise about 3.7 acres and include a mix of commercial and resi- dential properties. Most of the property is about 200 -feet deep off Shoreline Drive. Recommended land uses could include o Mid -rise housing r,%, 4,00 o Stand-alone commercial sites o Small retail center Because of the traffic along Shoreline Drive, this site would be accessed by a "right -in right -out" and could experience a longer wait time to make a left turn out of the site. Site #2: This property consists of three properties that collectively are about 4.5 -acres. These sites are not presently on the tax rolls and are either tax forfeited properties or owned by the City of Orono. The site is wooded and located directly to the north of the Navarre Fire Department and west of a for -sale townhome development. The site also abuts the railroad track to the north. Recommended land uses could include: o For -sale twin homes or villas o Attached for -sale townhomes o Mid -rise housing MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Page 53 TABLE 28 PARCELS OF INTEREST NAVARRE Year Market Taxes Number Address Owner Name Land Type Built Sale Date Sale Price Acres Value Total Total Potential Redeviopment 1 Area 1 3890Shoreline Dr EJ &MJ Held Residential 1991 Mar -93 $105,000 0.68 $320,000 $3,361 2 3860 Shoreline Dr David Umbehocker Commercial -Preferred 1930 N/A $0 0.64 $196,000 $5,272 3 3850 Shoreline Dr Leeryan Of Minneapolis LLC Commercial -Preferred 1987 Nov -02 $790,000 0.78 $759,000 $23,802 4 3800 Shoreline Dr M E Brewer& B LBrewer Commercial -Preferred 1956 Jun -01 $239,900 0.70 $290,000 $8,366 5 38 Address Unassigned City Of Orono Vacant Land -Residential N/A N/A $0 0.86 $0 $0 Total 3.66 $1,565,000 $40,801 Potential Reclevlopment 6 Area 2 38Address Unassigned Hennepin Forfeited Land Vacant Land -Residential N/A N/A $0 0.10 $0 $0 7 38 Address Unassigned Hennepin Forfeited Land Vacant Land -Residential N/A N/A $0 0.15 $0 $0 8 3770Shoreline Dr City of Orono Commercial -Preferred 2003 N/A $0 4.33 $0 $0 Total 4.58 $0 $0 Potential Redevelopment 9 Area 3 3542 Shoreline Dr Shoreline -Navarre LLC Commercial -Preferred 1986 Sep -04 $35,000 0.46 $528,000 $16,199 10 3502 Shoreline Dr Lowell RZitzloff Commercial -Non Preferred 1950 Apr -82 $60,981 0.31 $289,000 $9,512 11 3574ShorelineDr R L & G H Plaisted Commercial -Preferred 1959 Jan -03 $561,705 0.47 $183,000 $4,844 12 3572 Shoreline Dr Leis In Grace LLC Commercial -Preferred 1947 Aug -13 $250,000 0.31 $226,000 $6,260 13 3496 Shoreline Dr Skyt Properties LLC Commercial -Preferred 1979 Nov -13 $320,000 0.31 $339,000 $9,979 Total 1.86 $1,565,000 $46,793 Potential Redevelopment 14 Area 4 3416 Shoreline Dr Germ -Tom Partnership Commercial -Preferred 1955 Jul -87 $360,000 0.54 $581,000 $18,368 15 3400 Shoreline Dr 3400 Properties LLC Commercial -Preferred 1954 Feb -07 $375,000 0.29 $643,000 $19,984 16 3440 Shoreline Dr Richard W Bloomquist Residential 1951 Aug -99 $122,000 0.15 $215,000 $3,984 17 2377 Shadywood Rd Lake Country Corp Investment Commercial -Preferred 2005 Sep -15 $387,000 0.24 $378,000 $11,262 18 38 Address Unassigned City Of Orono Vacant Land -Commercial N/A N/A $0 0.47 $0 $0 19 3360 Shoreline Dr Leroy David Koehnen Commercial -Preferred 1969 Oct -84 $155,000 0.44 $383,000 $11,427 20 2385 Shadywood Rd S H Schmidt/SJ Schl tT?4--,,, Commercial -Preferred 1937 N/A $0 0.18 $197,000 $5,305 * 3400Shoreline Dr 3400 Properties LLC Commercial -Preferred 1954 Feb -07 $375,000 0.29 $643,000 $19,984 Total 2.60 $2,397,000 $90,315 Potential Redevelopment 21 Area 5 2474 Carman St W E Edwards & D M Edwards Tr Residential Lake Shore 1990 N/A $0 2.00 $1,130,000 $13,601 22 2480 Carman St R A Edwards Et Al Trustees Residential Lake Shore 1965 N/A $0 2.24 $1,116,000 $13,418 23 3465 Shoreline Dr Navarre Realty LLC Apartment 1952 Jan -80 $210,000 0.96 $795,000 $17,384 24 3423 Shoreline Dr Brook Investment Group LLC Commercial -Preferred 1952 Nov -07 $1,700,000 1.58 $782,000 $24,688 Total 6.78 $3,823,000 $69,091 Potential Redevelopment 25 Area 6 2455 Shadywood Rd Jeanne M Englund Vacant Land -Commercial N/A N/A $0 0.88 $137,000 $3,432 26 2465 Shadywood Rd David J Delaney Trustee Seasonal -Residential Rec 1920 Dec -09 $205,000 1.34 $164,000 $1,766 Total 2.22 $301,000 $5,199 Potential Redevelopment 27 Area 7 2520 Shadywood Rd Ugorets 8098 LLC Vacant Land -Residential N/A N/A $0 2.63 $0 $0 Total 2.63 $0 $0 *The Narrows Saloon Source: Realist Tax; Maxfield Research & Consulting,LLC MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Page 53 • Fri awl �• =tom, ti •' J• �. - �,J���,� .44 LL. �, �}; : " � '1 �,. 1101110 ■111 11 i�Q��►, ,�.f,i oil ■111■ �11o11■If I► •" � ■ a. X11■1� � - � i , Potential _ Site Parcels The Narrows Saloon`l .. LN Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. Sites of Interest for F December 19, 2017 Page 55 2 3 11 12 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 56 14 lb 19 23 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 24 Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 57 27 • Site #3: The third redevelopment area consists of five commercial properties that make-up 1.86 total acres; the smallest redevelopment area. Most of the commercial buildings are dated as they were constructed between 1947 and 1986. All of the prop- erties have frontage on Shoreline Drive and are surrounding by housing land uses to the north of the parcels. This area would have access and visibility to Shoreline Drive mo- torists; however, it will be challenging making left turns out of the site. Recommended land uses could include: o Mid -rise housing o Modest commercial development • Site #4: Located at the northwest quadrant of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road; this redevelopment area has the potential be the "gateway" into the Navarre neighbor- hood. The property is at "main and main" and benefits from higher traffic counts and excellent access and visibility from both roadways. As a result, this site could be the cor- nerstone for future redevelopment in Navarre. Collectively the site is 2.6 acres across eight parcels. Most of the existing uses are commercial, however there are two com- mercial uses located in low-density residential structures. Because of this location, this site should be the top priority for attracting redevelopment in Navarre. Recommended land uses could include: o Commercial concentration —front loaded design towards the roadways (parking in rear) o Mixed-use or multi -use development with a mid -rise housing component MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 58 • Site #5. This potential redevelopment area also has Shoreline Drive frontage, however on the south side of the roadway. The site is anchored by the east parcel that contains 1.58 acres and is adjacent to the Lunds/Byerly's. The site encompasses four parcels with 6.78 -acres; however, two the properties are zoned residential lake shore that could be subdivided and maintained by the current land owner. As a result, the total developable is about 5.75 acres should the lakeshore properties subdivide the property to align with the two other commercial properties. Recommended land uses could include: o Commercial development o Mid -rise housing development o Mixed-use development featuring housing and first -level commercial space • Site #6. Along Shadywood Road about one block south of the Lunds/Byerly's are two parcels that comprise 2.2 acres. Both properties have thick vegetation to the west and could be combined to create a more marketable site. Recommended land uses could include: o Stand-alone commercial building o Smaller mid -rise housing development. • Site #7. A vacant 2.6 -acre site is in the far southeastern boundary of Navarre area. The property is east of Shadywood Road and south of the five -acre commercial site located directly north of the site. The site has the potential to be the gateway into Navarre for the northbound traveler on Shadywood Road. Recommended land uses could include: o Stand-alone commercial development o Mid -rise housing development o Mixed-use development— 1st floor commercial with housing MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 59 Recommended Real Estate Types The previous section outlined the seven potential redevelopment areas. Many of the proper- ties could encompass a few different land use types given their location, access, and surround- ing land uses. The recommended product types that are recommended include: • Retail: As illustrated in the earlier leakage figures, Navarre and the Lake Minnetonka area is under -retailed. Navarre has an opportunity to capture these retail sales on prop- erty either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Among all the redevelopment areas, the site at the northwest quadrant of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road has the greatest potential to capture commercial tenants. However, this site will likely need to attract regional or national tenants given the site acquisition and development costs at this location. These credit -worthy tenants will have the means to pay higher lease rates that will be required to support redevelopment. Other sites in Navarre are more likely to cater to "niche or boutique" retailers that may have fled other higher -rent properties in other Lake Minnetonka communities. Because the Navarre area and Orono show leakage in nearly every category of retail sales; Navarre can support more retail than what could be developed given the acreage available within redevelopment sites identified. Several of the identified sites could support retail and there would still be excess demand for retail goods and services. Re- development sites #4 and #5 will be the most attractive sites for retail tenants. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC TABLE 29 SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT SITE POTENTIAL USES Combined Acres 93M Commercial Mixed Use/ Component Multi -Use 1 3.66 x x 2 4.58 x x 3 1.86 x x 4 2.60 x x x x 5 6.78 x x x x 6 2.22 x x 7 2.63 x x x Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Recommended Real Estate Types The previous section outlined the seven potential redevelopment areas. Many of the proper- ties could encompass a few different land use types given their location, access, and surround- ing land uses. The recommended product types that are recommended include: • Retail: As illustrated in the earlier leakage figures, Navarre and the Lake Minnetonka area is under -retailed. Navarre has an opportunity to capture these retail sales on prop- erty either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Among all the redevelopment areas, the site at the northwest quadrant of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road has the greatest potential to capture commercial tenants. However, this site will likely need to attract regional or national tenants given the site acquisition and development costs at this location. These credit -worthy tenants will have the means to pay higher lease rates that will be required to support redevelopment. Other sites in Navarre are more likely to cater to "niche or boutique" retailers that may have fled other higher -rent properties in other Lake Minnetonka communities. Because the Navarre area and Orono show leakage in nearly every category of retail sales; Navarre can support more retail than what could be developed given the acreage available within redevelopment sites identified. Several of the identified sites could support retail and there would still be excess demand for retail goods and services. Re- development sites #4 and #5 will be the most attractive sites for retail tenants. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 60 • Office: An office building with a build -to -suit tenant would be an excellent land use for several of the identified sites. However, this will be predicated on the ability to secure a single tenant who will commit to a built -to -suit office structure. The multi -tenant office market continues to be very soft with high vacancies and with rents that cannot support new construction costs. The office market continues to be the soft spot in the Twin Cit- ies commercial real estate market and that is likely to continue in the short-term as companies squeeze square footages and more employees work remotely. Since the of- fice market is the weakest commercial real estate product type in the Metro Area; office space will be more challenging to develop in Navarre unless a single -tenant user seeks out new construction. • Hospitality: The Twin Cities is experiencing a major building boom in the hospitality sec- tor due to a variety of conditions: 2018 Super Bowl, future Final Four, and improved economic conditions. However, with all the new supply occupancies have peaked and the hotel market is at equilibrium. If a site had lake access a small, boutique hotel could be considered in Navarre; however, since a lake site is unavailable we do not recom- mend a hotel concept at any of the identified locations. • For -Sale Townhomes: Because townhomes require a lower density than traditional mul- tifamily housing; most of the sites would not be well-suited for townhomes. Townhome land costs are usually lower than other multifamily densities hence the financial return on townhomes would be lower than other housing types located in multi -story con- cepts. However, the site just north of the fire station would make an excellent location for for -sale housing — either a townhome, twinhome, or villa style concept. The site would be well-received for a for -sale housing concept. Based on the site acreage of about 4.6 sites; this site may be able to accommodate upwards of 35 to 45 attached townhome units. • For -Sale Condominiums: The condominium market is ripe for new development as the market was hit hard from the recession and from the lack of new construction from the state law governing condominium development. However, this past year the Minnesota Legislature recently modified the condominium state statute that is resulting in condo- minium developers looking to re-enter the market. New condo construction has fo- cused on the upper -end of the market in Downtown Wayzata and Downtown Minneap- olis. Condominiums in Orono would be well-received and would provide an excellent product for existing residents to downsize from larger lake homes for maintenance -free living. As a result, we find a condominium development would be well-received in Na- varre and would serve a niche in the marketplace. Suburban condominium development should be able to support densities of about 20 to 30 units per acre. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates, Inc. December 19, 2017 Page 61 Senior Housing: Long-term the senior housing outlook is very promising given the aging of the population and future demographic shifts. Orono and the Lake Minnetonka area has an older demographic with significant growth in the 65+ population. However, there are several service -based senior housing communities located within five miles of Navarre that would compete with a new development in Navarre. At that same time, there may be an opportunity for active -adult products such as an age -restricted rental, for -sale 55+ condominium, or senior cooperative. However, the Navarre area can likely support one active adult product in the short-term. Suburban senior housing projects are averaging about 25 units or more per acre across the Metro Area. Rental Housing: Navarre and Orono have few rental properties; the City of Orono has an 85% home ownership rate and the majority of rentals are located in single-family housing stock. The Twin Cities is experiencing a major rental housing building boom as rental housing has been a preferred asset class over the past seven years, however the majority of new construction has been located in locations closer to the core. The Na- varre area may be able to support one rental housing development; however, because of development costs a new rental concept would have high rents targeting lifestyle renters. Many of these renters could be from the 55+ demographic who want to down- size from their single-family home. Rental housing could be developed in a stand-alone building or as part of a mixed-use development with first -level commercial space. New suburban rental properties in the Metro Area vary considerably between the inner - ring communities and the outer -ring communities. Densities closer to the core are aver- aging over 50 units per acre; whereas densities in the third -tiers and beyond are averag- ing 25 to 40 units per acre. Combined with properties in the two core cities; the average density for new apartments in the entire Metro Area is 74 units per acre for all new de- velopment in 2017. MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Community Engagement Open House: November 16, 2017 Drive-thru Old growth woods Small Crossroads of lake (2) Up north feeling Autooart store central Community Text Responses Small town feel (3) You know everyone The new remodeled storefronts of Narrows is a nice look Walking all year round - sidewalks clean and plowed in winter Everything you need right there - Lund's, liquor store, gas station Location (easy drive to downtown Minneapolis, center of Lake Minnetonka, urban yet woodsy feel) Dakota trail (3) Lake `��eec s Can walk to fill ma aiefrom home Lund's Narrows ora Create some character for Navarre - it is a blank slate Lighting - more pedestrian (2) Streetscape - planters, Christmas trees, benches Crosswalk - very dangerous Make it pedestrian friendly! (4) More of a town square feeling _ Nicer storefronts _ Create a sense of place _ Increase local businesses and move toward an exterior design patate over time _ Landscape on County Road 15 - too much concrete Restaurant or coffee shop 0 Highest Priority Planned for a future WW where it was safe to walk and bike and had a zoning/use code that favored local retail like a Made Navarre Continue the tradition of Navarre Restiral bike shop unique! We need more businesses that serve the community not office space, not apartment buildings or senior living - seniors do not spend any money, they will not revitalize the town - please don't make Design standards, the same mistakees as Spring Park or service businesses Wayzata - tax income over common sense. for area residents, Excelsior is a good example, charming sit down restaurant Design standards Walkability and They planned for a future where people were walking and biking - not driving! Navarre Community Engagement Open House: November 16, 2017 Spectrum Survey o�° Average Ranking (Strongly Agree = 1; Strongly Category by Average Percent Agree or Disagree = 5) Ranking Strongly Agree I plan to live in Navarre for the forseeable future. 1.5 100% I would recommend Navarre as a great place to live. 1.9 90% Navarre needs more businesses. 2.0 89% Sidewalks and trails are well-maintained. 2.7 56% There is adequate parking. 3.0 • • 50% 1 can walk to the places I need to go. 2.9 • • 44% Navarre is the Downtown of Orono. 3.1 • • 44% Navarre should be vibrant and active day, night, and on weekends. 2.8 44% There is a strong sense of community. 3.4 27% I feel comfortable as a pedestrian. 3.7 33% There is a need for greater variety in housing options. 3.9 14% Navarre needs more residents. 3.6 11% o�° Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Survey Monkey Online Engagement Please check the following boxes that accurately describe you Number Percent I am a resident of 1 2 Navarre 20 77% 1 am a resident outside 3 7 of Navarre, but in 4 3 Orono 4 151 1 am not a resident of 11 Average Orono 2 8% 1 own or operate a 15 62.50% business in Navarre 1 4% Rate your desire to see regular community events in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all desired, 5 = very desired) Number 0 0 Annual Festival 1 2 Quarterly/Holiday 2 5 shopping events 3 7 Races/Events 4 3 centered around the 51 9 Dakota Rail Trail 11 Average 1 3.4615385 What types of events would you like to see in Navarre? Number Percent Annual Festival 15 62.50% Quarterly/Holiday shopping events 10 41.67% Races/Events centered around the Dakota Rail Trail 11 45.83% Enhanced branding for Navarre 15 62.50% Cultural events 1 71 29.17% Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Survey Monkey Online Engagement Do you consider Navarre the Downtown of 0 Orono? Number Percent Number Percent Yes 16 61.54% No 3 4 15.38% 1 have not thought 8 57.89% 5 about it 36.84% 6 23.08% Overall, please rate your level of concern regarding the teardown and rebuild of single-family homes in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all concerned, 5 = very concerned). Number 0 2 Number Percent 1 8 2 4 3 3 4 8 57.89% 5 0 36.84% Building height Average 1 2.28 Regarding the tear down and rebuild of single-family homes in Navarre, which of the following issues are important to you? Number Percent Preservation of existing neighborhood character 11 57.89% Building massing 7 36.84% Building height 9 47.37% Loss of affordable housing 7 36.84% Issues related to construction 8 42.11% Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Survey Monkey Online Engagement Rate your desire for new multi -family residential and commercial development in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all desired, 5 = very desired). Number 0 3 desirable? 1 8 4 2 4 3 2 4 5 15 5 4 Average 1 2.384615 Rate your desire for new multi- family residential and commercial development in the City of Orono from 1-5 (1= not at all desired, 5 = Number 0 2 desirable? 11 4 4 2 5 31 4 4 7 15 5 4 Average 1 2.8461538 ora Regarding new multi -family residential and commercial development in Navarre, which of the following characteristics are desirable? Number Percent Affordable housing 4 16.67% Provision of additional business types and services 15 62.50% Places to go and things to do in Navarre 21 87.50% Increased population density 7 29.17 0 Building heights of 3 stories or more 4 16.67% Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Survey Monkey Online Engagement Regarding new multi -family residential and commercial development in the City of Orono, which of the following characteristics are desired? Number Percent Affordable housing 5 22.73% business types and 13 59.09% Places to go and things No concerns, but single family housing ONLY to do in Orono 19 86.36% Increased population I'm for anything that improves the quality and density 3 13.64% Building heights of 3 NOT multi -family residential any place good. stories or more 4 18.18% Comments Just like Minneapolis we need revitalization - main concern is pressure on existing infrastructure, Wide variety of housing is important tear them down damage to lake, inadequate roads I think its great to have old dilapidated homes New development must conform to the torn down and lovely new single family homes neighborhood current density replace them better support of existing business No concerns, but single family housing ONLY walkability, connection to other neighborhoods and No affordable housing at ALL!! No apartments! (no apartments) amenities I'm for anything that improves the quality and value of the housing stock. Tear downs are NOT multi -family residential any place good. Holiday market, car show... Construction site mtc is important, but easily Outdoor music in the park in the summer weekend if its not broke; don't fix it dealt with afternoons Pedestrian and bike connections across the community I Build more beautiful new homes I I think any and all community events are important t d r 10 imp T T 40 4- J I� t i Navarre Community Engagement Social Pinpoint Map Responses Social Pinpoint Online Engagement Good Location for a new Amenity or Places I Like to Go/Be Amblillik, r Development Really didn't need another auto parts store. Navarre and community can have a better image than 3 gas stations and 2 auto part Put a land bridge over 15 to connect the Great park - wonderful job stores 39 neighborhoods New to area, use all the services, improve Too much concrete, need it developed to store fronts host pop -ups? 3.71 New park location on both sides of the road On the main drag - need better Christmas Would be nice to have a nice entry point and Wasted space/find a better location for co decorations! There were even lights strung better signage at the entry to the trail shop! 0 across the street. Also need pretty planters Beautification of street and sidewalk - Great start with new light fixtures and banners - however, they are too high for pedestrian enjoyment and not at people scale. Need a consistent plan for plantings to create some neighborhood charm and character - I have a design background and have done lots of master planning and lighting for places like Love the trail - non traffic wonderful place to Edinborough Park - Edina, Minneapolis/St. ride, easy accessibility a 491 Paul airport, and landscaping Direct access to Lake Minnetonka in Navarre, Central gathering place 36 either a park or residential development Pedestrian only, like a square, gathering spot, 44 benches/fountain, meeting place Add/develop new businesses on the Dakota 42 Trail Great land to have a walking path to town 45 Navarre Community Engagement Social Pinpoint Map Responses Social Pinpoint Online Engagement Ora In Need better shops - especially on south side 41 of street 43 Sit down restaurant option, nice casual dining More multiple unit housing/city controlled 38 already Empty lot since 1965 tornado, not attractive. Great spot for development. Can't we get Champion auto parts to do something with their building? Disappointed that Patrick's bakery idea was turned down. It was an opportunity to have a slightly more upscale coffee shop/restaurant that is pleasant and 35 not filled with contractors. Ora In Navarre Small Area Plan - Traffic Volumes anka Beach _ JFr ringin HENNEPIN 11 - or Q Y r i r � \ Shorewood l ,Tonka B , w ! 5 •' / iii , November 30, 2017 1:16,000 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 mi 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km Functional Class Road Review Shoreline Drive (CSAH 15): A -Minor Arterial Shadywood Road (CSAH 19): A -Minor Arterial south of Shoreline Drive; B -Minor Arterial north of Shoreline Drive ORONO L --21Q--0 I 221i1i� 1030 4226 84 3 qo 51 ► O Qfl 5700 14 570# } LO M o >. SPRING 1 0 L9 00 PARK 4 � 0 4150 16400 tg-561 '��100£1 1 00 N ETONKA 6000 14000 1 EACH DEEP] TO MAP C N Forecasted Year 2030 19 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2030 Forecast Volume [OR EWOOD 2005 Base Volume ' • Base Volume Is From 2005 Hennepin County Flowmap And Minnesota Dept. Of Transportation Volumes From 2005 2030 Forecasts Incorporate Metropolitan Council Goal Of 1 Doubling Transit Ridership Over The Next 20 Years BAY + REEN OOI EXC E L 4IOR� NWPF N Roadway System Adequacy 2030 Operations era on vw�,,.rc.p.=.p aaeo .- Roadway Network N Possible Congesfion (1-1.20) N Probable Congestion (1.20) 0 2030 Forecasted ADT Range \\\ reeaN �anmrs�y �zope�w a� reearrya. Planning Level Urban Roadway Capacities Daily Two-way Volume (vehicles) Lower Higher Facility Type Threshold Threshold Two lane undivided 10,000 12,000 Two lane divided or Three lane undivided Arterials Four lane undivided Four lane divided or five lane undivided Four lane freeway 15,000 17,000 18,000 22,000 28,000 32,000 60,000 80,000 Freewa�i Six lane freeway 90,000 1 120,000 1 Eight lane freeway or Calculated on a segment by higher segment basis Choice of Roadway Section Based on ADT and Access Spacing --------------------------------------- 6 -Lane UnMee •..�:m snum�axrs aayc Plane Aaesse o, 5 10 Avt �xmg 660 ft. 1,g Ml J Lane "nd"'dad n -Lam owed L ar.e witli r:�:x rn Ian r: w sna W ders 30' 35 d0' 45' 50' __ 60' 95 330,1 150 R. 7 ,,. 20,40 15.iu'I d i � iu.uc S,ee Practical Operating Ranges fur Roadway Design Types 21 me 3 -Law A Le1K I Lane unidiwkd Divided Project Name: 2151000 CSAH 15 - Geometric improvements to CSAH 19 intersection Funding Start: 2018 Major Program: Public Works Funding Completion: 2019 Department.- Transportation Roads & Bridges Summary: o Revise the intersection of Shoreline Drive (CSAR 15) at Shadywood Road (CSAH 19) in the City of Orono. p -- —UMN GSTON-AVE Purpose & Description: Federal funding was awarded in 2015 through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to address existing safety concerns. The existing intersection is unique due to the abundance of driveways, including gas stations in three of the quadrants, within close proximity of the intersection. The proposed project will improve safety and traffic j L-YFt1G,AVE— �;, operations by implementing a new striping configuration on Shadywood Road (CSAH 19) to provide left-tum lanes, installing flashing yellow arrows to better facilitate left-turning movements, and eliminating channelized right-turn ORONO islands to provide traffic calming whenever feasible. The project will also include a replacement of the traffic signal t i� system that has reached the end of its service life and an upgrade of the ADA accommodations to ensure accessibility. snag ► ^"' er�o� O\fm ko 1- rsnas~ REVENUE'S Budget.taDaLr . Acf 8i EncTo=Daie _ . y13alance :zolcBudget loss Est(niate 'w,ia��gie ` . ,021 Esdinate 2022`7_stiinatie K I3eyo►xd,zElzz ::Total Property Tax 67,000 (67,000) - - - Federal General - - - 656,000 - - 656,000. Mn/DOT State Aid - Regular - - 250,000 432,000 - - - 682,000' Total - 67,000 (67,000} 2501000 110881000 1,338,000 EXPENDITUP.E5 Badget"t6babe Act:$ Enc'To'Date ;Balance; 2018 Budget, i,... :2Qi9.Estlsnate. OBD titt ale ;;202 Estimate 5 , •2d 2 Esfliia tie.. "•Beyond 2(172 ! Tota! .,':_. Land - - - 200,000 - - - 200,000 Construction - 67,000 (67,000) 11088,000 - 1,088,000 Consulting - 5,213 (5,213) 50,000 - - - 50,000 Equipment - - - - - - Fumishings - - - - Other Costs - - - - - Contingency - - - - - - Tutal 72,213 (72,213) 230,0001 1,088,000 1,338,000 II -30 Project Name: 2151000 CSAH 15 - Geometric improvements to CSAH 19 intersection Funding Start: 2018 Major Program: Public Works Funding Completion: 2019 Department: Transportation Roads & Bridges Current Year's.CIIP'ProcessSummary Budget to Date: 2018 Budget : 2019 Estimate ' 2620m Estiriiate . 2021 °Esti'riute;., . 2022°Estimate1,:`Beyond 2022 Total Department Requested - 250,000 1,088,000 - - - 1,338,000 Administrator Proposed - 250,000 1,088,000 - - - - 1,338,000 CBTF Recommended 250,000 1,088,000 - - - - 1,338,000 Board Approved Final - - - - - - - - Scheduling Milestones (major phases only): Board Resolutions / Supplemental Information: The funding of this project begins in 2019 with completion in 2020. Scoping: 2015-2016 Design: TBD Procurement: TBD Construction: 2019 Completion: TBD Project's Effect on Annual Operating Budget: No impact to department staff or annual operating costs are anticipated by this project. Annual Impact for Requesting Department: 0 sal Annual Impact for all other Depts: 0 \ 1 Total p Changes from Prior CIP: • Added $50,000 consultant cost to reflect experience . Increased construction cost by $193,000 based upon engineer's estimate update . Increased costs financed with State Aid Last Year's CIP Pi%Kms Summary Budgett:to Da 20117 '.2018 2019 :: 2420 2021 Begond Total Department Requested - - - 200,000 895,000 - 1,095,000 Administrator Proposed - - - 200,000 895,000 - 1,095,000 CBTF Recommended - - - 200,000 895,000 - - 1,095,000 Board Approved Final 200,000 895,000 - - 1,095,000 II -31 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN Page Introduction.................................................................................. 3C-2 Figure 3C-1 Community Designation 3C-3 Basic Housing Concepts and Principles..................................................... 3C-4 Table 3C-1: Population and Households 1970-2040 3C-6 Summary of Existing Housing Statistics.................................................... 3C-7 Table 3C-2: Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 3C-7 Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 3C-8 Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock 3C-8 Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions 3C-9 Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner -Occupied Units 3C-9 Figure 3C-2 Owner Occupied Housing by Est. Mkt Value 3C-10 Table 3C-7: Housing Cost Burden Households 3C-11 Housing Needs Identification..................................................................... 3C-11 Table 3C-8: Orono Housing Goals 3C-12 Housing Implementation Plan 3C-12 Housing Action Plan................................................................................. 3C-14 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 1 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN INTRODUCTION An increasing priority of national, regional and local concern is for the provision of an adequate supply of safe, affordable housing for all citizens. Land costs and other development factors suggest that these affordable and lifecycle housing needs can most practically be addressed within the urban areas of Orono. A secondary concern is that much of Orono's existing affordable housing is aging, and there is an increasing need for neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires that local comprehensive plans include "official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing" (Minn. Stat. Sec. 473.859, Subd. 2). To further address housing needs, the Minnesota Legislature in 1995 enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (LCA), establishing a fund for communities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Act provided for funding in three specific areas: cleaning up polluted land; revitalizing communities and promoting efficient development; and providing housing affordable to people with moderate incomes. As the Metropolitan Area continues to grow, the provision of adequate housing poses ongoing challenges for local and regional governments. The three primary facets of the problem include: 1. Supply - Inadequate supply of lower-cost housing in good condition; 2. Location - Concentration of low and moderate income housing in the core cities and inner suburbs; and 3. Affordability - A widening gap between the price of housing and income. 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2014 adopted its "Thrive MSP 2040" to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a "one size fits all" approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 2 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Community Designations City of Orono, "ennepin County and r,is Rf—FU i n— I hrdapenchmc■ Lake Vft"M Minnettiska Wwd�and MmMianka _11'...6Beach bound dark I [7iripAYaSrtrR �ilfnnemunks --.� Tonka I —i Ea I EOM# {, F7anhuFsan PrR= COMMU arty DVSijjn3VVn& Otge do [conch pianrirg auo�ntr ErrmMM SLbu bw fidw i"uaa Sud berm edge Rwal no-Skon4a 5ubjIbdn Dpvsru%d Rues= Urban Rwal 0Bnber Urban Ceraher ® Gr") 9awMerer Lires i.W IWiwr 4uars Figure 3C-1: Community Designations City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 3 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Community Designation Orono has been classified as a mix between Rural Residential, and Emerging Suburban Edge. Within the "Rural Residential", Metropolitan Council's role includes the encouraging rural development patterns that will protect natural resources and preserve areas where post 2040 growth can be provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infrastructure, and work with communities to plan development patterns that will protect natural resources and water quality and quantity, and maintain existing contiguous lots that are 10 or more acres in size. The local community's role is to: 1. Discourage future development of rural residential patterns (unsewered lots of 2.5 acres or less) and where opportunities exist, plan for rural development at densities that are not greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. 2. Implement conservation subdivision ordinances, cluster development ordinances, and environmental protection provisions in local land use ordinances, consistent with the Council's flexible residential development guidelines. 3. Promote best management practices for stormwater management, habitat restoration, and natural resource conservation in development plans and projects. The Metropolitan Council has established Orono's growth forecasts for the Planning term. Orono's populations is anticipated to increase to 9,500 persons by 2040, an increase of 575 new households. As an Emerging Suburban Edge, local government's role is 1. Plan and stage development for forecasted growth through 2040 and beyond at overall average net densities of at least 3-5 dwelling units per acre in the community. Target higher -intensity developments in areas with better access to regional sewer and transportation infrastructure, connections to local commercial activity centers, transit facilities, and recreational amenities. 2. Identify and protect an adequate supply of land to support growth for future development beyond 2040, with regard to agricultural viability and natural and historic resources preservation. 3. Incorporate best management practices for stormwater management and natural resources conservation and restoration in planning processes. 4. Plan for local infrastructure needs including those needed to support future growth. BASIC HOUSING CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES This Housing Plan is an indication of the ongoing policies and concerns of Orono residents toward addressing our own housing goals while taking considered and appropriate measures to address regional housing concerns. This Plan is a refinement and restatement of the planning direction established in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and updated in 1980, 2000, and 2008. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 4 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan The Housing Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's housing improvement programs complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, public health, fiscal responsibility and general land use. Orono's urban and rural areas provide distinctly different lifestyles, amenities and services which jointly characterize the community as a whole. Each area has separate planning priorities and separate environmental considerations. Urban areas and urban services will not be permitted to encroach on or destroy the rural area of the city. Orono has acknowledged the need for a wider range of housing alternative and has taken steps to provide new locations for development of urban density housing where it will not be in conflict with the rural area. Many of these areas have been guided or rezoned to allow for appropriate urban housing densities and have become a part of Orono's urban area. Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels similar to the forms of development typical of the closer -in suburbs. Opportunities exist for substantial rehabilitation projects in the older urban neighborhoods and for scattered -site new construction of affordable and lifecycle housing units. Overall urban density will not increase dramatically because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a steady pace. Strict subdivision review will ensure adequate retention of privately owned and maintained open space, wetland conservation, and on- site sewage treatment system site evaluation. The typical rural lot will continue to provide for a rural lifestyle as the low investment in public services continues to make the land competitive with more fully developed suburban properties. Orono's land use plans and programs allow new urban and rural developments to provide comparable cost housing opportunities. Orono's projected population growth dramatically declined in the 1970's primarily due to the 1975 rezoning. The projected population numbers for 2020 through 2040 shown in Table 3C-1 reflect the gradually decreasing size of the typical household, reduced from 3.16 persons per household (PPH) in 1970 to 2.59 PPH at the 2010 census. Household sizes are projected to shrink even further to a level of 2.39 PPH by 2030. Orono's 2030 population projection of 9,800 reflects an estimated 4100 households at 2.39 persons per household. In Orono, the Land Use Plan is the determinant factor in future growth, rather than allowing growth to drive the Land Use Plan. This is the cornerstone of Orono's long-term development philosophy and policies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 5 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan L Table 3C-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000g2,826 2016 2020L3,560 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- -- 2,1052,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- -- 1,0951,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,7663,037 3,200 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.732.53 2.53 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Orono's land use plan accommodates all planned population growth in a variety of housing opportunities. The forecast population increase of approximately 2,000 persons in the next twenty years translates into a housing demand of approximately 800 new dwelling units. This average of 40 new dwellings per year is consistent with Orono's rate of building permit issuance during the past two decades. Based on the Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. Successful development of a wide range of housing alternatives is directly related to the ability to obtain the necessary infrastructure and public services. In today's market, affordable housing and many forms of lifecycle housing are only feasible at urban densities, which require urban infrastructure such as municipal sewer and water, and the wide range of urban services not available in the 80% of Orono that is planned for low-density rural residential development. New housing alternatives in Orono are anticipated to occur within the existing urban area as well as in specified urban area expansions that are detailed in the Land Use Plan. These housing options will include a range of housing styles and types at densities of 2 to 20 units per acre. Where feasible, affordable housing units will be incorporated within High Density Residential in the Land Use Plan. These designated areas are depicted in the Land Use Plan chapter of the CMP. Development Density and Housing Goals Minnesota Statutes 473.859 Subd. 2(c) states that the content of the land use plan element of comprehensive plans shall "include a housing element containing standards, plans and programs for providing adequate housing opportunities to meet existing and projected local and regional housing needs, including but not limited to the use of official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing." 2021-2030 Housing Goals. For the period 2021-2030, Met Council established a goal of 154 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 6 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan affordable units. To accommodate Orono's share of new affordable housing units, the Land Use Plan must include 20 undeveloped acres of residential density at 8 units per acre or higher. This Land Use Plan added 19.89 acres of High density residential (20 units per acre or more) from existing levels. Much of this land is available designated for development immediately. SUMMARY OF EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS The following sections provide a brief summary of the housing types, occupancy tenure, structural condition and price range of housing in Orono. Housing Types The predominant housing type in Orono is single-family detached dwellings. This is true of both the urban and the rural areas of the City. However, the number of multi -family housing units has increased substantially since 2000, primarily along the Highway 12 corridor with the addition of the Orono Woods Senior Housing building and the Stonebay development. This recent increase in multi -family development is a direct result of implementation of the 2000-2020 Land Use Plan that guided a select group of parcels in northern Orono for higher residential densities. Table 3C-2 Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Single Family (One unit detached) 2942 2953 2954 2944 2960 2952 2962 2944 2956 3019 2988 3006 Townhome 88 94 101 102 108 74 98 74 74 74 80 96 Duplex, Tri, Quad 19 19 19 19 19 30 60 30 30 30 30 30 Apartment (5 or more units) 62 110 119 119 119 153 76 206 215 215 215 215 Mobile Home/Trailer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Other 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 13 13 0 0 0 Total Dwelling Units 3111 3176 3193 3184 3206 3209 3209 3267 3288 3338 3313 3348 Source: US census A review of the Owner/ Rental statistics shows that the number of rental housing units is rising quickly, from 5 percent in 2000 to over 15 percent in 2015. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 7 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 2000 2015 Occupancy Type Number of % of All Units Number of % of All 150 Units 345 Units Units Owner -occupied 2,604 89.60% 2,808 84.76% Renter -occupied 162 5.60% 505 15.24% Total Occupied Units 2,766 426 3,313 1960-69 Source: 2010 census, Metropolitan Council Age of Existing Housing Stock The range in ages of Orono's existing housing stock by defining the decade of construction is indicated in Table 3C-4. Approximately 56% of the housing stock is more than 50 years old, which raises concern about its continued functionality if maintenance is deferred. The numbers in Table 3C-4 do not necessarily reflect the extensive remodeling and upgrading that many Orono residences, especially lakeshore homes, have undergone in the last three decades. Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock (2000 and 2016) Year Built 2000 % 2017 % unknown 150 5% 345 10% Pre -1940 693 24% 663 20% 1940-49 172 6% 150 4% 1950-59 343 12% 426 13% 1960-69 298 10% 304 9% 1970-79 415 15% 366 11% 1980-89 412 14% 447 13% 1990-00 359 13% 367 11% 2000-09 420 13% 2010-17 203 6% Total 2,845 100% 3,346 100% Source: 2000 U.S. Census; Hennepin County Records City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 8 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Housing Demolitions Table 3C-5 reports the demolition of residential principal structures over the last 7 years. An average of 20 homes are removed per year. With land values continuously increasing and a substantial supply of older lakeshore homes still remaining in Orono, this trend is expected to continue. The City will monitor this trend to guard against the erosion of neighborhood character. Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions Valuation 2010 10 2011 15 2012 13 2013 25 2014 20 2015 27 2016 19 2017 33 Source: City Permitting records Cost Valuation of Housing in Orono Owner -occupied Housing The valuation of housing units in Orono is strongly tied to the location in relation to the lakeshore, though to some extent the age of the housing impacts the value. Much of the housing in Orono has been constructed as 'custom' housing rather than tract housing. Hennepin County Records were used to create the following table of housing values in Orono in 2015, illustrated as a percentage of total housing. Of note, almost 3/4ths of all owner occupied housing is valued at $300,000 or more. Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner -occupied Units 2015 Valuation 2015 $75,000 to $99,999 0.43% $100,000 to $124,999 0.93% $125,000 to $149,999 2.76% $150,000 to $174,999 3.39% $175,000 to $199,999 3.23% $200,000 to $249,999 8.10% $250,000 to $299,999 7.52% $300,000 to $399,999 10.51% $400,000 to $499,999 9.93% $500,000 or more 53.15% Source: Hennepin County City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 9 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Owner -Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value Orono a a +aa.E as f .■ a + a■a • * i a a a a• Ma pie !r* ■ M* a • a` ■'■ ai ai• ■fli t Plain * a. ■Medina � ■■ #■ * a t! � N. a ■ I_ —--'�.,>..---- ` .,�—--_..._. a• t.rwa.- ■;a w a a #■ ■■ �■■ Ai.i•-■� PItm io`u'cteh,t ■ • a r ■ r ++ i Independence*` i ■■ a s+i i _ ■ i +► � ira a .1r t L a# ong i a aw i • ■a #a '0a■ i *r * ; e; s' �a� Lake�■ aa ,� w■ ". �" * +job ■ �a+a`a•*a■ab'bi+--r,.ji'%.-+a+ *i*� •>fi No an a 600 am* rr t r ■� aa_no,`i ■ ■ . W* *•a Orr* S , ■ ■ ♦ _ r F ti fa Min netelsta*` '.:: ■ �: ar 40 Ya r. a= tea+ r■ I 41 ' I r• 'yltoi�dlartits I " .. Park 3116, ., ■ � t a 1M r Mound . + r + -P To�rnk 11 a awrRSL-"aaY ,��,, + r* �. h`oreood a � � ;S t w . to EA14 i. • 0 CDUrl,y BUJI111309S = Cq and Township Bmndanes Lakes and Major Rlweis — StreeCenlErIfleE Owner -Occupied Housing) (Estimated Market Value, 2615 $2M,SDO IX LEbs $2M,S1l1 ba 53ia,L'{ D �3a41.aa1 to S460,ND vrer yasa,Wa ■ a kdin-net onka - G: n W-00 1Imb-13.971 Tlles 4 - Sone vont. i'Je44Gi8 Regraim+Parcei 0ansr[, SD1I5 estinatatl rnMd w ue rar taxes payahe In _015. NIAe: Esllmated Uadu! 'Valuer s�tles nnN homes<.eair] u-i� 'th a b%Akl na an the parcel. Figure 3C-2: Owner Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 10 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Affordable housing According to the Metropolitan Council, there are 345 households within Orono that are at or below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). 345 households represents approximately 12% of the number of households observed during the 2010 Census. Table 3C-7: Housing Cost Burden Households Owner Households Income at or below 30% of AMI 167 Income 31-50% of AMI 100 Income 51-80% of AMI 78 Source: Metropolitan Council Subsidized Housing Units At the present time, the City of Orono does not contain any units of subsidized housing. This is due in part to the lack of or limited shopping and employment opportunities, public transportation, medical facilities. HOUSING NEEDS IDENTIFICATION In assessing local housing needs, Orono has identified the need for a broader range of housing choices including starter homes, empty -nester and senior housing, and an ongoing need for substantial housing rehabilitation. Our aging population is retiring and on fixed incomes. Orono has identified one of our greatest needs as housing rehabilitation for senior -citizen homeowners and for alternative senior housing accommodations in the immediate lake area. A second pressing need is for a wider range of housing options for middle income residents, such as those who grew up in Orono and would like to raise a family here, but cannot find suitably priced homes. A third identified need is for the empty nesters or professionals whose lifestyle better matches the amenities of attached unit housing. Orono's housing needs were identified in part through the LMACC Sub- Regional Housing Study conducted in 1998. There may be an opportunity to review and update the Housing study. The City of Orono will investigate and promote methods by which more moderate priced housing can be provided as the area around Wayzata Boulevard further develops. The northerly portion of this area is being reguided to allow for multi -family residential development at a density of up to 20 units per acre. Metropolitan Livable Communities Program In 1995 the Minnesota legislature enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, which established funding for metro -area cities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Metropolitan Council is responsible for implementing the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program, and negotiating with individual municipalities to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 11 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Orono has participated in the Livable Communities program since 1996. The program establishes benchmarks for housing affordability, life -cycle housing, and housing density. The City is required to identify numerical goals in response to the Land Planning Act. The City's housing goals in terms of affordability and the number of housing starts to meet projected growth appear in Table 3C-8. Table 3C-8: Orono Housing Goals Affordable Housing Need Allocation At or Below 30% AMI 69 Between 31% and 50% AMI 56 Between 51 % and 80% AMI 29 Total Units 154 Total New Housing starts by 2030 247 by 2040 340 HOUSING IMPEMENTATIONPLAN Orono's Housing Implementation Plan is based upon the following Goals and Policies which are designed to be consistent with our regional housing responsibilities and with the Goals, Policies and Plans of the other elements of the Community Management Plan. SCOPE The time framework of the housing improvement plan is intended to address the requirements of the Metropolitan Council for the planning period of 2020 through 2040 and retain Orono's own housing character. The goals, policies and proposed housing programs contained in this Chapter are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040. In addition, the housing programs also reflect Orono's plans for permanent maintenance of the low density rural residential community. Therefore, this Plan includes goals, policies, and programs for addressing the different needs of both the urban and rural areas of Orono. Housing Goals 1. To provide housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. 2. To provide opportunities for a mix of housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. 3. To improve the housing conditions of persons residing in substandard housing. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 12 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan 4. To provide safe, healthful, and blight -free residences and neighborhoods. 5. To provide immediately beneficial housing programs for the greatest number of Orono residents with affordable housing needs. Urban Housing Policies 1. The residential areas of urban Orono are primarily suitable for single family development. Because of historic development patterns, most of Orono's urbanized neighborhoods are located along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline, or within 1,000 feet of the shoreline. These lands are environmentally sensitive to overuse or over development such as typically occurs with large scale developments. Urban residential development in a limited number of areas further from the shoreline at a density of 2-20 units per acre is compatible with Orono's environmental policies of limited hardcover and maximum retention of natural open space and vegetation to protect Lake Minnetonka. 2. A wider range of housing types will be provided by planned residential developments. A limited amount of land is available within the Urban Service Area for planned developments of townhomes, garden type apartments or mixed residential and limited commercial land uses. These housing clusters or multiple family developments will be acceptable only where full urban services are available and only where the proposed density is compatible with the neighborhood and with local environmental constraints. Multiple family developments generally will not be considered appropriate for lands within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Additionally, County Road 15 is the key roadway serving Orono's urban areas and particularly the Navarre area. It is not practical from an economic or environmental standpoint to expand County Road 15 to increase its capacity. Therefore, additional housing options will be primarily developed along Orono's Highway 12 corridor in specifically identified areas that are or will be served by urban services. The City will consider proposals for developments that will provide housing types in furtherance of Orono's housing goals as established in this Housing Plan, for sites not currently guided for such use but which may be appropriate for such use. 3. Urban density residential development must occur within the defined Urban Area. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. The Urban Area as defined in this Plan will not be greatly expanded into the defined rural area, and urban services and facilities will not be extended into the rural area for purposes of fostering or allowing increased development in those areas. 4. Urban density residential development will utilize existing or planned public services and facilities. New residential development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the Urban Area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage, transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 13 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan users. New urban development will not be permitted if it requires additional unplanned local or regional facilities capacity. 5. The City will promote scattered site development as opposed to large scale tract development within the existing developed urban area. 6. The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard homes. Whereas there is no identifiable block of deteriorated housing in the City, there are a substantial number of older homes or converted cottages that are in need of repair, energy conservation measures, or major rehabilitation. In many cases, these homes are occupied by low income or fixed income persons who cannot undertake the needed work within their means. Maintaining existing neighborhoods and existing homes enables maintenance of affordability. Replacement of these homes, even with higher density development, would result in substantially increased housing prices. The City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts to improve the existing housing stock, to improve and maintain the neighborhoods, and most importantly to improve the living conditions of the affected citizens. 7. The City will promote development or rehabilitation that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The City will encourage all homeowners and developers to be conscious of the neighborhood, the site and the environment in the design and improvement of residential properties. The City will encourage, and in many cases, require the retention of woods and vegetation, open spaces, light, air and scenic views. No new development will be permitted to conflict with or to adversely affect the established neighborhood character. Rural Housing Policies I. Housing in rural Orono will be limited to single family homes at established rural densities. The majority of the rural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. 2 The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard rural homes. Rural Orono contains a significant number of older homes, which also require repair, energy conservation measures or major rehabilitation. These rural owners also require the same type of assistance often reserved for urban areas. Therefore, the City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts in both urban and rural housing improvements programs. HOUSING ACTION PLAN Orono's Housing Action Plan is a set of implementation policies designed to achieve the above stated Housing Goals and Planning Policies. A top priority in Orono must be improving the housing conditions of persons who are presently inadequately housed and eliminating substandard housing. There are deteriorated and dilapidated housing units located throughout the City. Orono's Housing Action Plan is aimed principally at improving the condition of Orono's older homes, both urban and rural, and improving the housing conditions of Orono's City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 14 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan many low, moderate and fixed income residents. L Orono will cooperate with neighboring cities to fulfill area -wide housing needs. Most apparent is the need of many senior Orono residents who desire to live in the immediate area, but who cannot find available senior housing. Orono will actively participate with nearby municipalities to facilitate the provision of senior housing at locations that are near to home yet also convenient to necessary shopping, transportation and medical facilities. 2 Orono will continue to participate in housing rehabilitation subsidy programs. Many Orono residents, both urban and rural, are occupying older housing that has code -related structural, safety or health hazards, substandard living conditions or energy inefficiencies. They would like to improve their housing condition and their neighborhood's appearance, but are unable to because of insufficient income. Orono will continue to actively participate in Community Development Block Grant and Minnesota Housing Finance Assistance programs designed to help these citizens meet their very immediate housing needs. 36 Orono will encourage developers to provide a variety of housing types and cost ranges. Whenever a multiple family or clustered housing development is proposed, Orono will actively encourage setting aside a reasonable number of units for large families and/or for low and moderate income families. Orono will participate and assist developers in applications for loan guarantees or other suitable forms of housing subsidy aids which may be available. Orono will also consider proposals for lifecycle housing options for sites which have not been guided for such use, but where such use may be appropriate if developed in a manner that is sensitive to the surrounding land uses and has the necessary services available. Such areas may include property that is currently guided or zoned for more intense uses such as commercial or industrial, or may include sites adjacent to existing higher intensity uses. 4 Housing construction will be subject to uniform state building code requirements but will not be burdened with unnecessary zoning requirements. Orono does not intend to require arbitrary minimum dwelling sizes or minimum amenity installations as these artificial standards only drive up the cost of housing while limiting the buyer's freedom of choice. 5. Orono will promote energy conservation methods and procedures. Orono will actively pursue and advertise all available programs for energy conservation funding. G To achieve its housing goals outlined above, the City will evaluate opportunities to utilize public and non-profit programs or to partner with other agencies in these programs. The programs available to the City and developers to support affordable housing, depending on circumstances, include the following. ■ Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority: ■ Housing Bonds: Minnesota State Statute allows HRAs to issue housing bonds to provide affordable housing. ■ Tax Abatement: Cities may issue bonds to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, using a portion of the property tax received (tax abatement) from the development to finance these bonds. This removes this property from paying taxes for the services needed for this property, its residents and the community in general. The City may develop a tax abatement policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and the guaranteed length of affordability City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 15 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan provide sufficient public benefit to justify the use of tax abatement. ■ Tax Increment Financing: Cities may create a housing district to create a tax increment financing (TIF) district. The TIF bonds issued on this district are to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, and property taxes received above the original tax value (increment) from the development are utilized to finance these bonds. The property tax revenue that otherwise would be available to pay for city services would be restricted and not available to pay for the services. The City may develop a TIF policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and the guaranteed length of affordability to provide a public benefit is great enough to justify the use of tax increment financing. ■ Minnesota Housing Consolidated Request for Proposals: The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency provides a request for proposal (RFP) once annually where affordable housing developers can apply for funding to construct affordable housing. The City may consider supporting applications for new housing that addresses the City's need allocation of 244 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives. ■ Community Development Block Grants (CDBG): The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funds to communities with over 45,000 residents for the use of providing and maintaining affordable housing. Hennepin County HRA administers these CDBG funds for the City of Oorno. The City will consider applications that addresses the City's need allocation of 244 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives. ■ Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Grants: The NSP was established by HUD for the purpose of stabilizing communities that have suffered from foreclosures and abandonment. The focus of this program is the purchase, rehabilitation and resale of foreclosed and abandoned properties. The NSP grants are administered by the Hennepin County HRA. ■ Energy Assistance: Local energy companies offer programs intended to encourage energy efficiency and responsible use of energy resources. ■ Livable Communities Grants: The housing rehabilitation funding is provided through the Hennepin County housing rehabilitation program, which is funded through the CDBG program. The City will consider supporting applications for new housing that addresses the City's need allocation of units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives. ■ Fee Waivers or Adjustments: State rules require that city fees correlate to the cost of providing the services. The city will closely monitor expenses as they relate to project review to ensure fees closely match expenses. ■ Zoning and Subdivision Policies: The City frequently grants variances and adjusts its zoning and subdivision regulations through a planned unit development (PUD). The City currently provides zoning incentives such as increased density and potential staging plan flexibility for projects which achieve the city's housing goals. ■ 4(d) Tax Program: The 4(d) tax program provides a 4% tax credit to affordable housing developers. This program is administered through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. ■ Land Trusts: A land trust achieves affordable home ownership by owning the land on which a house is located, allowing the resident to seek financing only on the house. The resident enters into a long-term lease for the home. The advantage of a land trust is that the trust can control the future sale of the property to ensure that affordability can be maintained and have the ability to scatter the land trust sites throughout the community. The disadvantage of a land trust is that it will take significant financial resources to purchase the land rights and those resources are never recovered during the period that the property remains affordable. Orono may evaluate if joining the West City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 16 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust is the most efficient way to use its resources to provide affordable housing. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 17 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction Purpose and Scope Roadways Fig 1 Functional Classification Table 4A-1 Roadways Classification Summary Table 4A-2 A Minor Arterials Table 4A-3Collectors Table 4A-4 MSA Roads Table 4A-5 Road Design Capacity Table 4A-6 Road Capacity Table 4A -Future Capacity Fig. 2 Ring Road Concept Fig 3 Access Curve Fig. 4 Maintenance/ Cost Curve Table 4A-8 Maintenance Trails Lake Access Table 4A-9 Transit Freight Aviation Implementation Plan. Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives Table 4A-11 Transportation History Appendix A. TAZ Zones B. Map T-1 Existing Functional Class C. Map T-2 Existing Jurisdiction D. Map T-3 TAZ zones E. Map T-4 Existing Traffic Volume F. Map T-5 ADT G. Map T-6 Existing non -motorized facilities H. Map T-7 Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure I. Map T-8 Metropolitan Freight Systems Page 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 11 12 14 15 16 18 18 22 22 22 23 23 27 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 1 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The City of Orono's transportation system generally operates well today. The City's multimodal transportation system includes facilities for personal vehicles, freight, walking, and bicycling. Facilities are operated by a number of agencies, including the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, MnDOT, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad. This transportation chapter has been prepared in compliance with state statues and applicable Metropolitan Council guidelines. As part of this plan, the City has reviewed existing and future conditions for each mode and identified safety, operations, and network improvements that will be important to address before 2040. The City has also developed goals, objectives, and strategies to preserve and improve the transportation system. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) This plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The TPP is a regional plan that evaluates the existing transportation system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current residents while accommodating the region's anticipated growth. The TPP also guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and established regional performance measures and targets. The TPP is guided by the following goals: ■ Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets. ■ Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users. ■ Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. ■ Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State. ■ Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system contributes to communities' livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments. ■ Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity, and sustainability. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 2 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ■ Lake Access, Preservation, and Management. Access to the Lake recognizes the value of the lake and reinforces the desire to protect its value to the community and the region. Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current transportation revenue will not meet the region's transportation needs through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long- term investment scenarios: a fiscally -constrained scenario under current revenue, and an increased revenue scenario that identifies priorities should additional transportation funding become available. Under the current fiscally constrained revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway mobility and access are limited to those that address multiple TPP goals and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility, access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth. Orono's Place within the TPP Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. The TPP does not include any planned regional investments in Orono. ROADWAYS The sections below provide information about the existing and future roadway system within Orono; including functional classification, jurisdictions, capacity, safety, access management, and maintenance. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 3 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Functional Classification System The Functional Classification System organizes a roadway and street network that distributes traffic from local neighborhood streets to collector roadways, then to minor arterials and ultimately the principal arterial system. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land and mobility for through traffic. Functional classification gives an indication of the relative hierarchy of roadways in the transportation network. Four classes of roadways are included in the Seven NNW - County Metropolitan Area functional classification Image: MnDOT system: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Map T1 shows the existing functional classification of each road in the City of Orono and Map T2 shows existing roadway jurisdiction. The following sections describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways fall into each classification. Figure Functional Classifications City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 4 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A -I Roadway Classification Summary Table Criteria Principal Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Arterial Place Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects Connections metro centers major trip neighborhoods blocks and regional generators and minor within business business neighborhoods concentrations concentrations and land parcels within Intersections Grade separated Traffic signals, All -way stops, As required for or high-capacity roundabouts and roundabouts and safe operation intersection cross -street stops some traffic controls signals Parking None Restricted as Restricted as Usually necessary necessary unrestricted Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct Limited access to Access to Unrestricted property access property properties is property access common Typical Average 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 1,000-15,000 Less than 1,000 Daily Traffic Posted Speed 45-65 mph 35-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 Limits mph Right-of-way 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Width Transit Priority access Preferential Designed for use Normally used Accommodation for transit in treatment where by regular route as bus routes s peak periods needed buses only in non- residential areas Map T-1 Functional Classification Principal Arterials Principal arterials are roadways that provide the greatest level of mobility and access control. Within the metropolitan area, the great majority of principal arterials are under MnDOT jurisdiction. Principal arterials are typically Interstate highways or other state or US freeways or expressways. Principal arterials also connect to other cities, regions, and states outside of the metropolitan area. Principal arterials are intended to maintain average speeds of 40 mph during peak traffic periods. To maintain mobility and speeds on principal arterials, land access and transportation system connections are limited. There is little to no direct land access from principal arterials. Access is limited to interstate freeways, other Principal Arterials, and A Minor Arterials. Access points are typically grade -separated or controlled with a signal and are spaced approximately one to two miles apart. Within the City of Orono, there is one principal arterial: US Highway 12. The TPP does not identify any specific regional mobility improvements on this highway, although maintenance and preservation investments will be made on all highways. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 5 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Minor Arterials The minor arterial system supplements the principal arterial system and provides connections to the principal arterial system. Minor arterials also support access to major traffic generators, including regional job concentrations and freight terminals, and between rural centers within and just outside the region. Access points along minor arterials are generally at -grade and typically controlled with signals or stop signs. The Metropolitan Council has established a system of "A" Minor and Other Minor arterials. "A" Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has further split "A" Minor arterials into four types, described below. The City has one (1) mile of minor arterial roads. Table 4A-2: A Minor Arterials A Minor Arterials Other Relievers Au menters Expanders Connectors Purpose Provide Supplement Supplement the Provide safe, These supplementary the principal principal arterial direct roadways capacity for arterial system system in less connections connect major congested, in more densely between rural traffic parallel densely developed or centers and to generators in principal developed or redeveloping principal arterials the region. arterial redeveloping areas in rural areas Other arterials areas without adding are not eligible continuous for federal general purpose funding lane capacity Hennepin CSAH 112 CSAH 6 CSAH 6 (West Willow Drive County CSAH 15 of McCulley N (N of System CSAH 19 (S of Rd) CSAH 6) 15) CSAH 19 (N of CSAH 15) Orono McCulley Road System Collector Streets Collector streets provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one another. Collector streets generally favor access to the system over mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. These roadways are generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. They are usually owned and operated by cities, although counties operate some of these facilities. Orono has 20 miles of Collector Streets. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 6 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-3: Collectors Major Collector Minor Collector Major collectors serve higher density Minor collectors serve shorter local trips and lower Purpose residential areas (often penetrating density land uses (often penetrating residential residential neighborhoods for neighborhoods only for a short distance). significant distances), job and activity centers and freight terminals that are not on the arterial system, and they serve longer local trips, including local bus service. Existing Other CSAH 84 (Bayside/Leaf Fox St/Old CSAH 151 (West Branch North Arm Dr) Jurisdictions Crystal Bay Rd) CSAH 51 North Shore Dr) CSAH 146 (Brown Road S) CR 201 (Homestead Tr) CSAH 135 (Tonkawa Rd) Existing Orono Brown Road N Stubbs Bay Rd (Bayside Ferndale Rd W System Old Crystal Bay Road (N of Fox) to Watertown) Hunter Dr Watertown Road Ferndale Rd N North Arm Dr Willow Drive (S of CSAH 112) Kelley Pky Orono Orchard Rd Fox Street (E of Willow) Leaf Street Spring Hill Rd Casco Point Road Tamarack Dr Dunwoody Ave Wildhurst Trail East Long Lake Rd Local Streets Local streets connect blocks and land parcels, and the primary emphasis is on land access. In most cases, local streets connect to other local streets and collectors. In some cases, they connect to minor arterials. Local streets serve short trips at low speeds. Local streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of Orono. Orono currently has 27 miles of publicly owned local streets. Orono's history has had a significant impact on the local road way systems. Northern Rural Orono Roads The straight-line road grid system in central and northern Orono was established along section lines a century ago to efficiently serve the agricultural activity in the City. This grid has readily adapted to use as a collector system for the many local and private roads created to serve new rural residential subdivisions in the last 40-50 years. Southern Lakeshore Roads City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 7 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan The seasonal recreational uses that grew up along Orono's 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline a century ago resulted in a network of winding roads that commonly followed the center of the narrow peninsulas between bays, creating local road frontage for lakeshore lots while also often serving as the main road between settlements. A large number of these roads do not meet current road specifications as they are narrow, winding roads with steep slopes. Private Roads A private road is a privately owned and privately maintained road, located in the rural area or within a planned development that functions as a local access street. In order to curb maintenance expenses the city has, since the 1980s, maintained a policy that developments in Orono's rural area would be serviced by privately maintained roads. The city does require that the private roads are built to city standards and that the city is granted an underlying easement to ensure right of access. As a result Orono currently has 20 miles of privately owned and maintained roads. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. Rural properties should be served by private streets unless through streets. State Aid Roads To support the state's system of streets, roads and bridges, MnDOT distributes funds for highway maintenance and construction to counties, cities and townships based on a formula determined by the Legislature. The roads that are on the state aid system typically carry heavier traffic volumes, connect major points of interest, and provide an integrated and coordinated road system. The majority of the county Roads within Orono are designated County State Aid Highways (CSAH). The City has 9.45 miles of roadway eligible for Municipal State Aid (MSA). Table 4A-4: MSA Roads Name Description State Aid # Willow Dr County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 101 Old Crystal Bay Rd County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 102 Watertown Rd Willow Dr to County Road 6 MSAS 103 McCulley Rd Entirety MSAS 104 Fox St Old Crystal Bay Rd to Brown Rd MSAS 105 Brown Rd N County Road 6 to Wayzata Blvd MSAS 107 Leaf St Watertown Rd to Bayside Rd MSAS 109 Ferndale Rd County road 6 to City Boundary MSAS 110 Planned Functional Classification Changes There are no planned changes to functional classifications of roads within Orono. However, five jurisdictional transfers are under consideration based on existing functional classification and traffic patterns. McCulley Road to Hennepin County to tie CSAH 19 to CSAH 6. Old Crystal Bay Road to Hennepin County to connect CSAH 84 to CSAH 6. Bayside Road (CSAH 84) From Hennepin County to Orono. Tonkawa Road (CSAH 135) from Hennepin County to Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 8 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Roadway Capacity A roadway's capacity indicates how many vehicles may use a roadway before it experiences congestion. Capacity is largely dependent upon the number of lanes. The table below lists planning -level thresholds that indicate a roadway's capacity. Additional variation (more or less capacity) on an individual segment is influenced by a number of factors including: amount of access, type of access, peak hour percent of traffic, directional split of traffic, truck percent, opportunities to pass, and amount of turning traffic, the availability of dedicated turn lanes, parking availability, intersection spacing signal timing and a variety of other factors. Table 4A-5 Design Capacity Roadway Type Daily Capacity Planning Level (ADT) Two-lane undivided urban 10,000 Two-lane undivided rural 15,000 Three -lane urban (two- 17,000 lane divided with turn lanes) Roadway Capacity — Traffic Forecasting The Metropolitan Council uses Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) for traffic forecasting. Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Orono, is divided into a series of TAZs (see Map T3). The TAZ data for Orono can be found at Appendix A. The modeling shows the majority to the projected growth in the city within the TAZs that correspond with City Municipal Utility Service Areas (MUSA) which further corresponds to the cities areas for higher existing and planned densities. Current and Future Regional / Hennepin County Capacity At the planning level, capacity problems are identified by comparing the existing number of lanes with current traffic volumes. The table below illustrates the existing number of lanes on state and county arterial roadways within the City. To identify the need for potential future capacity improvements, Hennepin County compared 2030 forecasts to planning -level roadway capacities. Nearly all State and County roadways within the City have adequate capacity to handle forecast 2040 traffic volumes with little to minimal congestion. (See Map T4). Based on traffic counts in 2015 the only Hennepin County road currently undersized based on capacity is Shoreline Drive (CSAH 15). The 2015 ADT for CSAH 15 was 17,600. Those roads projected to exceed their design capacity by 2030 are highlighted red below. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 9 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-6: Road Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid 2016 2030 Route # ADT ADT Estimated Highway 12 Principal Two Lane -divided NA 28,500 31,500 Arterial Wayzata Blvd Minor Three -lane -urban CSAH 112 11,000 26,000 Arterial County Road 6 Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 11,000 10,700 Arterial undivided -rural Watertown Road Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 10,000 (CR6) Arterial undivided -rural Shoreline Drive Minor Two-lane, CSAH 15 Arterial undivided -rural Shadywood Drive(N Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 5,700 13100 of 15) Arterial undivided -rural Shadywood Drive (S Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 11,900 of 15) Arterial undivided -rural Northshore Drive Collector Two-lane, CSAH 51 4650 5700 undivided -rural Brown Road S Collector Two-lane, CSAH 146 1450 2100 undivided -rural West Branch Collector Two-lane, CSAH 151 1750 undivided -rural Bayside, Leaf, Fox Collector Two-lane, CSAH 84 690 2000 Streets undivided -rural Tonkawa Road Collector Two-lane, CSAH 135 560 undivided -rural Homestead Trail (CR Collector Two-lane, ----- 1050 1900 201) undivided -rural * Data from Hennepin county's 2030 ADT Forecast prepared in 2009. NEED 2040 Modeling #s County Road 15 is the primary minor arterial for commuter traffic through southern Orono. Because County Road 15 abuts the shoreline along much of its route, the City is committed to retaining its character as that of a scenic parkway serving local residences. Such a character is incompatible with its minor arterial function. It would therefore be preferable to reduce the volume of traffic on County Road 15 by providing an additional east -west corridor in southern Orono. However, the configuration of Lake Minnetonka=s bays and the severe topography between them, as well as the large number of wetlands in the shoreland areas, preclude the development of such a corridor. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 10 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan To address this issue, the Ring Route was established in 1980 by connecting County Road 19 to County Road 6 via McCulley Road, providing a relatively direct route northeastward to Highway 12 from the western Lake Minnetonka area. The City will encourage the use of this ring route to address traffic congestion through the Navarre Area. Congestion policies The City will continue to work with the County and other transportation agencies to facilitate improvements to the transportation networks. This assistance may include right of way or easement procurement, staging of Orono projects, and information outreach. Orono Roadway Current and Future Capacity Collector and minor arterial roads under the City's jurisdiction are all two-lane roadways, are currently, and are projected to remain under their maximum capacity guidelines of 15,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Forecasted 2040 traffic volumes are shown on Map - T -5. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 11 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-7: Future Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid 2015 2040 ADT Route # ADT Estimated* Fox St Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 105 1025 1639 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 1948 3116 Rural Willow Dr Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 101 4319 6908 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 4708 7530 Rural Watertown Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 103 4428 7083 Rural McCulley RD Minor 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 104 5633 9010 Arterial Rural * the 2040 ADT estimate is based on the 2015 ADT x the Increase in the # of households which is 60% Table 4A-7 Future capacity Roadway Safety Providing a safe transportation system for all users is a high priority for the city. This needs to be accomplished through a combination of engineering, education, and enforcement and is to be targeted towards all users including drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The City continues to proactively work with the county and other regional local and state partners to incorporate safety into all transportation designs and efforts. In order to address safety issues on city streets the City adopted a Traffic Management Policy in 2014. The policy is intended to provide a systematic process for the City to address traffic concerns by a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management and safety techniques. Access Management The purpose of access management is to provide adequate access to adjacent land development while maintaining acceptable traffic flow on higher level roadways. Management consists of carefully controlling the spacing and design of public street intersections and private access points to the public roadway system. Arterials, being designed for higher speed, longer distance trips, generally have reduced or restricted access, while local streets can accommodate much greater access. Collector roadways fall in between arterials and local roadways regarding the amount of access that is permitted. The agency with jurisdiction over a City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Freeway Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector 0 Minor Collectar as a Local Street Cul Do Sac Increasing Access >-• Figure 3: Access Curve Part 4A, Page 12 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan roadway sets access management guidelines. Regional / County Road Access Access to US 12 must meet MnDOT access management guidelines and is permitted subject to conditions. Hennepin County has established access management guidelines for county roads. Hennepin County requires permits for new driveway access to county roads and when land uses change at a site adjacent to a county road. In addition the county reviews development plats for access management compliance. Hennepin County typically requires that new access points meet its guidelines; however, the county can make exceptions to the guidelines with sufficient justification. (See Hennepin County Transportation Plan for detailed county access requirements and guidelines). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 13 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Orono Access Management Management of access to principal and minor arterials is necessary to ensure a safe and efficient arterial system. Direct individual property access to arterials is regulated in the Orono Municipal Code by requiring development of local or private roads to serve new residential developments of 3 or more units; by limiting the number of curb cuts per residence; by prohibiting direct access to principal arterials; and by a number of other regulations involving the location, type and number of access points to the arterial roadway system. However, many of southern Orono's arterials near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline have historically served a dual function as both arterials and as local/collector streets, due to geographic and topographic limitations. It should be noted that there are existing access points that do not meet City, County, and MnDOT access spacing guidelines. In most cases these access points were established prior to agency access spacing guidelines. In other cases the agency has granted an exception to the existing guidelines. As roadways are reconstructed, each of these agencies generally works to modify and/or relocate access points that do not meet current access spacing guidelines in the interest of long term safety and efficiency. Pavement Preservation / Maintenance. Pavement Preservation is a program employing a network level, long-term strategy to enhance pavement performance by using integrated, cost- effective set of practices that extend pavement life, improve safety and meet resident's expectations. As the diagram to the right illustrates, as the pavement condition decreases, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can increase significantly. Maintenance activities applied to surfaces in better condition, such as sealcoats, thin or structural 75%'rime Lowest Annual Resurfacing Cost 4096 Each $1.00 of Renovation Quality Cost Here Drop Will Cost $4.00 to $5.00 if Delayed to Here. 40 % Quality Drop Total Failure 123% Time i 4 8 12 16 Years (Time Varies for Each Road Section) Source: "The Hole Story, "American Public Works Association overlays may prove to be more cost effective than waiting until the pavement is in Figure 4: Maintenance/ cost curve poor condition when it is necessary to perform more costly maintenance or reconstruction. An effective preservation programs addresses pavements while they are still in good condition. A cost-effective treatment in a timely manner will restore the pavement almost to its original condition. By doing so, the cumulative costs of such treatment are substantially less then reconstruction or major rehabilitation over the life of the pavement. In addition the disruption of traffic is less for more frequent and minimal treatments in comparison to larger construction treatments. A proper Pavement Preservation program consists of three primary components: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 14 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-8 Maintenance Type Description Examples Preventive A planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to Chip sealing maintenance an existing roadway system and its appurtenances Slurry or micro surfacing that preserves the system, retards future Thin overlay deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity). Routine Day-to-day activities that are scheduled by Cleaning of ditches & structures maintenance maintenance personnel to maintain and Pavement markings maintenance preserve the pavement at a satisfactory level. Crack filling Pavement patching Minor Minor Structural enhancements that extend the Overlays rehabilitation service life of an existing pavement and/or Mill and Overlay improve its load carrying capacity. Geiger, D.R., Pavement Preservation Definitions, FHWA Memorandum dated 12 September 2005. County Road/ Pavement Maintenance Hennepin County implemented a pavement management system in 1996 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. The Program is used by the County to develop priorities for pavement maintenance projects on county roads. (See Hennepin county Transportation Plan for details on their Maintenance program) Orono Road/Pavement Maintenance The primary need for Orono Roadways in the coming years is maintenance. Over the last decade Orono had underfunded road maintenance and replacement operations and therefore the roads have fallen in to disrepair. Orono adopted a pavement management system in 2014 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. While a certain share of the City's annual levy is dedicated to Pavement Management Fund (PMF) each year for maintenance, much of the city's infrastructure is aging. This is particularly challenging in the older, more developed parts of the city. Many of these roads are old, were not initially designed to support the land use forms desired today, are not pedestrian or bicycle friendly, and are in need of both infrastructure and land use revitalization. Also a lack of adequate funding for preventive maintenance activities has resulted in a great deal of deferred maintenance. This deferred maintenance has undesirable consequences from a financial as well as a user perspective, and effective planning is needed to ensure that quality infrastructure is sustained over time. Streets that receive no preventive maintenance are often beyond repair in just ten years, while streets that are properly maintained at critical stages in the life -cycle can last up to twenty-five years or more. Local roadway maintenance has the potential to become more of an issue in the future due to Orono's reliance on privately maintained roads to serve the rural neighborhoods. Orono's 20 miles of private rural area roadways are currently maintained by individual property owners or through neighborhood homeowners associations. Conversion of these private roadways to a public status with public maintenance would result in Orono's road maintenance costs increasing substantially. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 15 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Bridge Maintenance State and county Bridges The vast majority of bridges located within Orono fall under the jurisdiction of the state and county. Orono Bridges All three bridges under Orono roadway jurisdiction have been completely replaced within the past ten years. These include the bridges on West Ferndale Road, Fox Street, and McCulley Road. The three bridges are enrolled in the state bridge maintenance systems and received bi-annual inspections. TRAILS This section addresses network needs for walking and bicycling within the City of Orono. This section includes information on the existing non -motorized transportation network within Orono, connections to land use planning, the planned local non -motorized transportation network, and the planned regional non - motorized transportation network. This section also includes recommendations for intersection improvements and design best practices. This section also addresses the needs of people using wheelchairs and assistive mobility devices such as mobility scooters, as they are considered pedestrians. Existing Non -Motorized Transportation System The existing non -motorized transportation system consists of sidewalks, multi -use paved trails, turf trails, and paved shoulders. Map T-6 depicts the existing and planned trails within the City limits of Orono. There are currently limited facilities for walking and bicycling in the City, and these facilities serve recreational uses better than transportation uses. There is not currently a connected network in place to serve the needs of people bicycling and walking for transportation. Regional Non -Motorized Transportation Network The Metropolitan Council established a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) in 2015. The RBTN establishes regional priorities for bicycle transportation so that regional destinations are accessible by bicycle. Regional multi -use trails within the City limits include the Luce Line, Dakota and Independence Regional trails and are owned and operated by Three Rivers Park District and the Minnesota DNR. Several existing and planned trails and shoulders will be key links in the expanding regional non -motorized transportation network. A Tier 1 alignment, identified in the RBTN, includes a segment of Shadywood, north from excelsior, connecting to the Dakota Rail Trail. There are no other connections contemplated by the RBTN. Orono Non -Motorized Transportation Network Sidewalks are generally located within newer residential developments and more dense residential and commercial portions of the city. As part of our recreation -open space plan, Orono has developed a trail plan focused on providing links between both local and regional recreational and open space areas, as well as links within the urban areas for pedestrian and bicycle access to Orono's Navarre commercial area and links between the Orono Schools and the Long Lake downtown area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 16 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Connections to Land Use Planning The City of Orono has development patterns consistent with its designation as an Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community. Existing residential development is low density and commercial land uses are separated from residential land uses. This means that people walking and bicycling must cover greater distances to reach commercial areas from their homes. The development patterns in the City are better suited to bicycling than walking, due to the distance between residential and commercial areas of the City. Non -Motorized Transportation Design Considerations As non -motorized facilities are planned and designed, the City should consult additional planning and design resources, including: ■ Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan ■ Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan ■ MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual ■ Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ■ Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities — American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ■ Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities — American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ■ Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) — US Access Board Accessibility Accessibility is a very important consideration for non -motorized design. All new pedestrian and bicycle facilities must meet the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility guidelines. To address accessibility issues, the City developed and adopted and ADA transition plan in 2017 aimed at bringing sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA guidelines. Trail Policy It is the policy of the City to encourage the development of sidewalks and trails. In urban densities, sidewalks should be added to at least one side of roads. In all development densities, connections to the existing or planned trail network should be made or rights preserved. The City will support the expansion of trails and or bike lanes if feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 17 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan LAKE ACCESS, PRESERVATION, AND MANAGEMENT Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. This value was long ago realized by City leaders. In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to Win width. These right-of-ways (often referred to as "fire lanes" or "lake access roads") vary considerably in their proximity to traffic, parking availability, proximity to housing, lakeshore conditions, and other factors that effect their recreational value. Some of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice -fishing accesses. Certain accesses have docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography, shallow water depths, undesirable lake bottom conditions, and/or dense vegetation and experience little or no usage. Of the City lake accesses shown in Table 4A-9, half of those located outside of Big Island are either undeveloped or closed to public use. In addition to Orono's relatively small public lake access corridors, other governmental agencies own and operate significantly larger lake access properties in Orono. These include the DNR Maxwell Bay Access, Hennepin County's North Arm Access and Hennepin County's Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park. These three large facilities benefit from Metro Transit bus service on their County Road 51 frontage, and are used regularly by visitors from the greater metropolitan area and beyond. The Noerenberg Gardens lack the docks and ramps supplied at the nearby Maxwell Bay and North Arm locations, however the Noerenberg shoreline in Maxwell Bay is a popular place for boaters to anchor and swim. Even more popular destinations for Lake Minnetonka boaters are the Hennepin County beach at Cruiser's Cove on Big Island, and Orono's Big Island Park, which has dockage and hiking areas. Orono also owns and operates Summit Park on Long Lake. Orono offers public lake access through five commercial marinas within its boundaries. Its private recreational facilities with lake shore are Camp Teko on North Arm Bay and the Minnetonka Power Squadron on Big Island. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 18 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-9: City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current ID Access Name Plat Between Designated UPDATED 4-24-2018 or Street Name Section Address #s Use # Notes Brown's Bay (Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline - Shoreline Drive - 2-S Across from Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area "Molly's Corner" 1410 and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; (Outlot A, Shoreline popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible. Dragonfly Hill) Fire Boat dockage Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Winter vehicular access allowed. Spates 3 North Shore Drive 10-S Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep at Shoreline Drive slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay -- North Shore Drive 9-S 2605/2655 No longer a public access ("Town Road") 4 North Shore Drive 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30' wide platted road right-of-way at Baldur Park Road -- North Shore Drive 17-N 3685/3705 33' wide eastward extension of North Shore Drive east of Shadywood (Hennepin County jurisdiction) 5 Shadywood Road at 17-N 1998/2000 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on Sunset Dr either side 6 Crystal Bay Road 17-S Adj to 2264 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore; City also (West end) Shadywood owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for "boating and bathing"... status currently under discussion 7 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3405/3415 20' relocated alley from Railroad property to (Relocated shoreline; potential lake access from railway corridor. extension of The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed Bayview Place in filed Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which plat of "Wallace's states that the 20' strip is "heretofore taken for street Addition...") purposes" and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 8 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3339/3345 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer (Platted extension of lines, potential access from neighborhood and Hillside Place) Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing - Fox 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian Tax records show access as Outlot A, owned by owner St. year-round, of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City vehicles winter maintains access only Stubbs Bay City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 19 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'s 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 11 Bayside Rd. at 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33' platted road ("Oak Street" in plat of "Bay View Stubbs Bay Rd. Park") Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from NA Two 60' platted roads and one 65' platted road to the 3640, 3700, Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park; and Theresa St. in plat of Ottoville on Lake 3750 Bayside Minnetonka). These potential access points are not opened for public use. 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of NA 30' realigned platted road (Realigned "Lake Street" in 3775 Bayside the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka) (See street file 3775 Bayside). Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 30' platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only. North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline - usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 30' wide platted road, not developed, steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from NW end of platted developed road as it extends to 1384/1392 shoreline 18 Oak Place (Platted 8-S 3768/3818 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from road in plat of North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to Shore "Crystal Bay Dr shoreline; mostly wetland or under water View") 19 Sandy Beach 8-S 3898/3908 Swimming 60' wide platted roadway used for City beach (Extension of Maple Beach Cherry Ave Place) 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/ 50' wide platted road, undeveloped 1330 Cherry P1 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 60' wide platted road right-of-way , access not developed, walking use only 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 20' wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 "Summit Avenue" 7-S 1067/1101 50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to (Extension of shoreline 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not 1453 Park Dr developed West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive 7-S "4795" 33' platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co. Rd. west end (adjacent 19 plus tax -forfeited Lot 10, Block 6, `Bergquist and Shoreline to Orono/M'trista Wicklund's Park...'; undeveloped corridor primarily border) for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 20 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan IDF Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'2 28 North Shore Drive 7-S 4731/4745 40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of at "Adams Street" `Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..." undeveloped, Extension very steep, used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 33' platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline, paved but no boat launching available 31 Orchard Beach 7-S West of 1530 50' platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline; tree Place growth and topography limits vehicular access 32 Highwood Lane 7-S 4156/4167 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline; steep slope Extension to shoreline, undeveloped Highwood Rd 33 Highwood Road 7-S 4051/4075 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not Alley developed 34 Corral Road 17-N 1785/1825 20' platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking Extension access Concordia ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Notes 35 Fagerness Point 18-N Across from Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat Accretions 1965/1985 of "Fagerness"; title registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no Fagerness Pt Rd public access remaining Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Swimming 60' wide platted road ("Carman St") used as a City Beach swimming beach Casco Pt Rd 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy 20-S 3486/3508 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Place) shoreline east of Ivy Place - steep, used for drainage 39 "Spring Street" 20-S 2600/2618 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of "Kaster Cove" - undeveloped, walking access only Casco Pt Rd 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Cannan/ 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock 3555 Frederick 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Swimming 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Lydiard Rd Beach shoreline, used as a City swimming beach Big Island A N. End of "Lawn 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Avenue" Island Park B E. end of "Tooisit 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Avenue" Island Park - slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted r'dway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable gravel road for emergency & service vehicle access D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+1- wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, Morse Island Park City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 21 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'s E "Meadow Lane East 23-S 280/290 20' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Extended" Morse Island Park - steep slope makes use difficult F "Meta -Comet 23-S 340 33' wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Avenue South" Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Park 2nd Addition G "Massasolt Avenue 23-S 440/450 33' wide platted roadway between Lot 1, Morse Island West End" Park and Lot 1, Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park - steep slope H "Meadow Lane 23-S 450/460 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Alley" Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles I "Pleasant View 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Street" Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe Table 4A-8 TRA /UNIT Orono is categorized as a Transit area IV. Transit Market Area IV has lower concentrations of population and employment and a higher rate of auto ownership. It is primarily composed of Suburban Edge and Emerging Suburban Edge communities. This market can support peak -period express bus services if a sufficient concentration of commuters likely to use transit service is located along a corridor. The low- density development and suburban form of development presents challenges to fixed -route transit. General public dial -a -ride services are appropriate in Market Area IV. The three primary routes serving Orono are Express Route 675 and 677, which provide express service to downtown from the Mound, Navarre and Wayzata commercial areas along County Road 15, and Express Route 674 which provides similar express service to western and central Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata. The TPP's Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Orono in the Current Revenue Scenario. (See Map T-7) FREIGHT Freight transportation in Orono is primarily served by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail line parallel to US 12. There are no freight facilities within Orono. The BNSF rail line does not cross any roadways within the City. There are no large freight traffic generators within the City. Most truck and rail traffic is passing through Orono on trips to, from, and through the Twin Cities. Heavy truck traffic is for the most part constrained to roads under Hennepin County and State Jurisdiction. (See Map T-8) A VIA TION Orono is not in an influence area of a regional airport and is therefore not subject to associated land use restrictions. . Airspace protection should be included in local codes/ordinances to control height of structures. There are currently no existing or planned aviation facilities within the City of Orono. However, the City is responsible for airspace protection in order to reduce hazards to air travel within the region. Given the distance to the nearest airports, there are no radio beacons or other air navigation aids located in off -airport locations in Orono. Any person or organization who intends to sponsor the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 22 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan construction or alteration of a structure affecting navigable airspace as defined in Federal Regulation Title 14; Part 77 needs to inform the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) of the project. This notification is accomplished through the completion and submittal to FAA of Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. In Orono, this requirement applies to any construction or alteration exceeding 200 feet above ground level. The City's zoning code allows a maximum structure height of 30 feet; therefore it is unlikely that any structures in the City will require FAA notification. There are no seaplane bases located within the City. There are currently no heliports in Orono nor any known plans to construct one. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. The existing level of seaplane operation is satisfactory to Orono. The City will support the LMCD in their monitoring of seaplane operation and in any reasonable changes in regulations necessary to prevent seaplane conflict with the primary boating use of the lake. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section of the Plan provides the goals objectives and strategies that can help city officials implement the Transportation Plan and make wise long-term decisions. Goals and Obiectives The following table displays the goals and objectives of the Orono Transportation Plan. The goals listed below represent the City's overall vision for transportation over the next 20 years. The objectives listed below provide guidance that the City can use to reach the transportation goals. Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives Goals Objective 1. Facilitate efficient movement of 1.1. Regularly assess transportation maintenance needs and include people within and through the City roadway, trail pavement, and other transportation infrastructure maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan. 1.2 Efficiently preserve and maintain the City's transportation system in a state of good repair. 1.3. Provide safe and efficient routes for emergency and public safety vehicles. 1.4. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdiction (MnDOT, Hennepin County) to provide adequate capacity to relieve congestion. 1.5. Encourage sound access management. 1.6 Encourage, with other government agencies, the expansion of multi- modal and transit services in the city to support resident and business transportation needs 2. Facilitate efficient movements 2.1. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions (BNSF, MnDOT, Hennepin of goods within and through the county) to ensure the safe and efficient flow of Freight through the city of City Orono 3. Provide a transportation system 3.1. Coordinate transportation system investments with the Orono Land that is integrated with land use and Use Plan. 3.2. Design, construct, and maintain roadways that fit the character of the development adjacent land use 3.3. Require all new (private or public) residential streets be designed to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 23 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan General Transportation Policies 1. Commuter and general arterial traffic must be directed away from Lake Minnetonka. The sensitive environment of Lake Minnetonka, and the property rights of the riparian landowners, are being damaged by continued reliance on this outmoded roadway location. 2. Orono will actively promote use of the Ring Route and Highway 12 to provide viable efficient alternatives to continued over -use of County Road 15. 3. Existing collector and arterial roadways will be upgraded as necessary in a manner that does not encourage additional commercial traffic or through commuter traffic on any of the City's primary north -south collector roads. These roads, specifically Orono Orchard Road, Brown Road, Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road, are primarily located in the rural area and serve a dual function both as collectors and as local streets. Discouraging expansion of their use by non - local traffic will help to preserve the rural character of the area while enhancing safety. 4. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. 5. It is the city's intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography, water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions, the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. 6. As always, both public and private property rights will be considered. To this end, the City will be guided thusly: a The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. b The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 24 City standards. 4. Improve transportation safety 4.1. Implement safety improvements to address high crash locations 4.2. Proactively address bicycle and pedestrian safety concerns along for all users and modes of transportation roadways and at crossings. 4.3. Bring sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA. 4.4. Support traffic calming and design to minimize speed on minor City collectors and local roadways. 5. Develop a safe and convenient 5.1. Invest in multi -modal transportation solutions including bicycle and multimodal transportation system pedestrian infrastructure. 5.2. Preserve and acquire adequate right of way for sidewalk and trail construction. 6. Conserve and enhance 6.1. Incorporate storm water Best Management Practices into all environmental resources transportation construction and maintenance projects. 6.2. Incorporate natural feature preservation into road construction project as practical. 6.3 Incorporate Best Management practices for natural resources within the city rights of Way General Transportation Policies 1. Commuter and general arterial traffic must be directed away from Lake Minnetonka. The sensitive environment of Lake Minnetonka, and the property rights of the riparian landowners, are being damaged by continued reliance on this outmoded roadway location. 2. Orono will actively promote use of the Ring Route and Highway 12 to provide viable efficient alternatives to continued over -use of County Road 15. 3. Existing collector and arterial roadways will be upgraded as necessary in a manner that does not encourage additional commercial traffic or through commuter traffic on any of the City's primary north -south collector roads. These roads, specifically Orono Orchard Road, Brown Road, Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road, are primarily located in the rural area and serve a dual function both as collectors and as local streets. Discouraging expansion of their use by non - local traffic will help to preserve the rural character of the area while enhancing safety. 4. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. 5. It is the city's intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography, water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions, the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. 6. As always, both public and private property rights will be considered. To this end, the City will be guided thusly: a The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. b The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 24 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 7. Orono will consider conversions of private roads to public roads as requested on a case by case basis. The factors considered in evaluating a proposal may include: a. The condition of the street. The condition of the street is consistent with city standards. b. Affected property owners. The desire of the affected property owners. The city does not intend to acquire maintenance responsibility for private roads unless requested by a majority of affected property owners, or c. Safety. If the condition of the road restricts access to the parcels by emergency vehicles, the City may affect the improvements. d. Ownership. Provision of Right of way or an easement Urban Transportation Policies 1. Local streets in the urban area will be owned and maintained by the City. 2. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. 3. Urban streets will be constructed to urban design standards. 4. Curb cuts and driveway locations will be limited for traffic safety. 5. On -street parking will be strictly limited. All urban development must provide adequate on- site parking facilities. 6. The City will pursue additional pedestrian and bike -hike trail facilities. 7. The City will promote improved mass transportation services for urban neighborhoods, including park and rides. Orono encourages improved bus scheduling and improved service, especially at off-peak hours. Rural Transportation Policies 1. Public streets in the rural area will be primarily limited to the existing collector and arterial grid system. 2. The Ring Route concept utilizes as much as possible the existing rural highway system. The City of Orono will encourage all necessary road system improvements required to accommodate and to facilitate through traffic on the Ring Route. 4. Rural residential developments will utilize private road feeders to supplement the existing public road grid. 5. Private rural roadways will be constructed to rural design standards. 6. The City will guarantee reasonable maintenance levels and public access on all private roads. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 25 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 7. Driveway locations and rural street or private road intersections will be limited for traffic safety. 8. Rural trails are an integral part of the total alternate transportation system. 9. Mass transportation services for rural Orono are not economical, hence the City will promote the use of Park and Ride locations where local service is not feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 26 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Transportation Plans Table 4A-11 Transportation Plan history Policy or Plan Description Adopted Traffic Management Provides a systematic process for the City to 14 December 2015 Plan address traffic concerns from residents through a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management techniques Snow and Ice Policy Established the city's response to snow and ice events Under Review that impact the cities roadways. Setting policies for snow and ice management involves balancing the following priorities: public safety, personnel safety, environmental stewardship, cost and Adaptability. Pavement Establishes the standards and priorities for Maintaining 27 October 2014 Management Plan the city's roads over a ten year time period. Further it identifies the annual Operating budget needs for pavement maintenance. Americans with The plan guides the Cities policies and practices with 13 November 2017 Disabilities Act respect to maximizing accessibility and use of city (ADA) Transition facilities by individuals with disabilities. Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 27 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Appendix A. TAZ Data City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 28 TO o O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M CO N Ln O W Ln M O M O Ln M N N M (` N O r- M W co N (O M N co cO G W i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ O O O O O O y O N N N M O W O N MLO V C I- co O N N M 7m d) M Ln CO Ln CO M M O N y a O 3 O 0 M 7 i- WM CO M N W M Ln M I- Ln N V M N M N V M N .- V Ln N (fl V 7 Un 7 M NI-: 0 O y a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a0 0 a = O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N M 7 N lf') N M Ln V CO N W M r- V V O M O) M O M V M M CO O IT N (D M W N N M M N N N G O O a ', 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O N r- N M M O V N N M n N O f` N w N . N CO G W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N y W N M I� O Ln O) O) M V d' Ln M M i� N M V M M W N O M M V M M N O N y -6 O O O M = O y t I.- M V V Ln O d' N 7 W M Ln N N N M N N Ln d' V N V Ln M N N d' N M (fl L[7 Ln (fl O y 'O i Q O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a = x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln O M N M N M N I- M co V I- M W O O M W V O i- Ln M O W co f` d' N O M I- I- Ln M O 7 G O O a T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W N V M M N O N M V 0 N N M Il- N O f` M M N N N ti N CL C G W OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y O Ln W M O V M MM M 7 M L[) N M V N M M N O M co N co Ln d) y � O 7 O O N = O y NLn Lf) M (0 M Ln M CO Ln f- (` CO M M Ln M V V Ln 00 N I- V Na I, Lf) 'I: N W d' N N V W M M (fl W V M 01 O y 'O L C O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C a = O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N Ln V 7 N M M M N n M W 7 d) P.- d1 O M N V M M M M O N M M N V co M I� W M M Q O O a A N Ln N Ln M M M N r N Ln CO M O M O M N N M In I- M M co (O M N N Ln N M M N co W M (D O R W N V co h O) m (D Ln <Y R V' Ln L[) O Ln n V 7 m y M N Ln N W N Lf7 O w N 7 N NM (0I - (O O M M N O M y � O 7 O O r = W Ln W N I- W (` I- M LM M M O) I,- M O (O In In N W I, O Ln W W 7 V 7 W I- W Ln M Ln Ln M I� V O y '6 n 0 0 N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CL W M O O N r O W K W O N d' O Ln O M I- co N Ln (O h - N co M N (D M C It M � M M N I- V V d' M 7 M O W W M Ln N N M M d) M O O) W V 3 C O. O O O N M V M W (` N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M In M N In LO O O O O O O O O O O O O) W O O O Q) W O W O City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 28 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN rn Turner Road =o 0 O Drake Dr r c 3 O U cc 0 o: m Game Far 26 1 Pa-,ntef W Branch Road E MI00 Moline Road a I 1 I County Road —,4 Katrina Star ._.,_...�....�....� �..� Existing Roadway Functional Class BOLTON E K March 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. i•"f�l.�! �fl.L !_lfif �fli 11 f� M M Z E z `2 ~ 6th Ave N c�ro o Dickem r° N g Lake o Lake Q,�e Classes m m Sp�oo'i� Kelle Y Long A z '� v Y*P ""'"•`• Lake,: j G�N\e� 0 0 12 Danie�++r� a Orchar'-'r q ay 51'0wh Ro ` Grand Ave)r oo 40- Lake � 1 Lake • ! . • _ 1 Lydiard Lake •'� ��� eats/a ) GY9 d R • , _ ! . oda e w �i +� Io —• 12 --. Stubbs Bay Fox. St � %Ii e.NLn~ / North Brow; Bay 1 Arm Maxwell L Bay. , French Forest z � Marsh Lake c Jenning's Bay e I 1 v N Shore Dr o< n Road E �• �r Bracketts I Point �.• . " I v0 � 1 West �• �' � Dutch 1 Arm Crystal Bora Lake V' Bay Pnint •• • . m , 1 LHarrison .. �.� • �' a� 1 1 ' fT Bay E Lynwood Blvd c ' - • • _ .. _ . _ ; Ott \�-- U ,r Shoreline Dr c`�� ■ ■ Lafayette ,1 e< Bay �• 1 Legend .r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT �116VIE W5 e Sprin, P, Carman's40, 1 Bav '•. Ca. �• � Poi, I 19th,Ave N Wayzata Bay z c J 4th' A�i T 1 Ivd E fno �Qw o v s m _Hi hland Ave- °' ° Functional Classification 3-3 lQar Principal _ A Minor Connector A Minor Reliever . Other A Minor Expander Major Collector Minor Collector Figure T-1 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� 4� Orono, MN �'f,4y v�k tee__ rner Road Drake Dr . � r RC pante W Branch Road Id Road E R 0 w m m Game Far Dutch Lake i Legend Moline Road 1;,.0 Harriss City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT / = 1 U Existing Roadway Jurisdiction BOLTON March 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. -wh j `C Ro1 f .. ..�. � C3 Y - ._.._. ` C Moot r .. ._ Lake -1 12 Star £ _� z z `o O o o • 6th Ave N fJ Dicko �oaa Lakee3 Lake pye N m Classen ! Long d0. as "'�"• Z / m • GJpe� af0 Daniels St 1 e_ m Existing Roadway Jurisdiction BOLTON March 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. -wh j `C Ro1 f .. ..�. � C3 Y - ._.._. ` C Moot r .. ._ Lake -1 £ _� z z `o f0 ~ o • 6th Ave N Dicko �oaa Lakee3 p`p Sp<�,,,� m PINPk�y Long d0. • "'�"• Lake m • 12 Daniels St 1 d 119 Lake • . ay rn�09� • *ate. .e Ysige o' 0 .. Ro o • — 12 da GY9 > J � R O N w U 3 W- Browo Fox St c) aF' Tanager Bay •� Lake •� 1 Z • � 1 3 �c 1 N Shore Dr •. �c Smitr' Bracketts 1 • Bat `Point Crysta ♦ 1 . Bay .� ••�•. 1 1 1 '� • X .�• e 400, 4400, c 1 2 �Ae N Z71, 1 1 t—r 1 r`—V r" I t Jurisdictional Classifications Z c J v �- MnDOT Municipal Street Hennepin County Private Road Figure T-2 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� 4 Orono, MN Transportation Analysis Zones BOLTN — (D 8c M E N K March 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. 00 Turner Road w Lake p� j 2 Katrina Lake Star/ r 920 c z w c '`g24 r° ----.._,...._...£ _.._. 925 / " _,._.,_ _ „_.._ akon e ° z — 19thAve� ` 22T eC� �a P, th-Av�,N 1011 T934 Drake Dr �j N Shore Dr _ -1 Game Farm Road E °m a z o • 6th Ave N w 2 Y o 1010 937 Point 0 West °ak eY 92T,,��IX°ad Dutch Va rm Crystal Bohns Bay _ Lake >CEJ m • ve N Lake Classen 922 �- z vko, Harrison .r Spar � L diard ��1001 ake 4innetonka z res �e G��Pr ��.. n °am_. 956'`—, � u �° Kelle 923 d°' Long Lake °(1002 IIfR Shoreline'Dr e� y , 936°a . _ c 958 -. 'Y; m �„"''"• `�•� `' Lake •�'�' 926 m N 9ti�Ave Y c ���e� �''� ' •• -Y 2 Daniels St m 8th Ave eN` > _ 935 L �G �' d� e� �, m y Orchard�1 Grand Ave n Ways Oi a� LL Carman's o 5 0 4th Ave N 3 m .r Moline Road s mN Bay °wnRo ad 931 ' 0 929 ���i a G s i l a °,g eke �'o �' 3rd,AveN 100 A 932 '� •sem d°, ,� 26 - 952 R GY9—Ccc , 928 = 12 974 m 972 Rice S- i t Blvd ubbs 16 I B cn F 975 F d Z` �a a PainterR°a 93O _ keS r � t 994 o Fox St`e T W Branch Road v a `eva Ln ' f a� y 'County Road 151 North N 954 Bro ns • Fe�c ayzafa tj �, � Arm Tanager Bay � ay 941 ' l xwell Lake D B • French e ` I •i Sunnytield Road E J Forest 3 Marsh 976 I) 992 V) M o w -Highland Ave tledge Road 1-0 Q 9 7 8 Traffic Analysis Zones TAZ Boundary #### TAZ I D Figure T-3 A 993 Lake p� c z w c Jenning's m c Bay 953 N Shore Dr Game Farm Road E Smith Bracketts w Bay Point a c o V West Dutch Va rm Crystal Bohns Bay Lake >CEJ m . Harrison ake 4innetonka E Bay 956'`—, Lynwood Blvd U 9.51 — • • — • • — • • ; t Shoreline'Dr e� y , . a �tv _ c 958 d Lafayette t Bay •�' Legend �''� ' •• : City Limits Lakes &Ponds g park Carman's •• .r Bay Bay Ad�� 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams p/ 100 969 0 3,500 Feet e Casco Point -- 968Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, � Hennepin County, MnDOT / � eon 976 I) 992 V) M o w -Highland Ave tledge Road 1-0 Q 9 7 8 Traffic Analysis Zones TAZ Boundary #### TAZ I D Figure T-3 A 993 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Existing Traffic Volume & Crash Data BOLTON March 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. CD I ij o, 15 Turner Road CD O O 2 . — . Star ._. 19 t3 ...., v O 3 1$00 20 0 -1�'. ....rr . .—a...—...x-..� ...—.....r e. ...i' — r . � L � � P � �10 til Ave � O °r.—... ..—..— °....— v' 5 CD ° E _ 20th e N Drake Dr q0 N d 0 6th Ave N ® © 10 4500 7 mosso q 0 - •1 0 CO 15 O (� v c� O 3 c 2 4co � o Dickey O 1 6 oad 12 I 5 2 1 6 146 3 0 6 o '' Lake c S ���` �` 5 2 O 16 9 00 7 1 2 3 J# 7 5800 YeeK 07 - ® i~ 0 302.9 `" _ NAL - _Ql . ©0 i _ 2 ! 00 t G s 100 ��,. 0 Lydiard r Z O 275 3 0 a o $?40`~L-4900 IF 8 7400 4 13 - Long Lake I o 7 0 3 l•O 12 . "" • `• • �. 4 r. a M � i• `< 3 1 8 - O 2 7 • • n 8th Ave, N 6 th Ave N - 4 6th Ave N ° 0 0 0o s O Q 2- 2 4 IF 16 . 6"M�.'2 5 4 1 1 t-� _ t+r^s 3 x O,�O o r q 1 1 � 5 1 J) 4 s q VSs. N o 0 3 0 ropo mN 1 O 870 1 1600 15 660 \ '� "` 1 1 1850 3 1700 — 5 L'4�' 3 2 dysW � M � 'tel I� N 1 � rn O 1 1 — .. — 3 12 � ® o � 1 d j q 1 q 1 00 M cv 1—� 1 CD 1 q 0 850 N Arm..Dr �3 �f 1 c_ UM '`•oad PainteCD 3 r rn c 7 o � 1 680 1 1 4 1000- 6 M Fox W Branch Road 1 a •e.N _ 1 14_ 1 3 330 OS 03 20 1 20 41300 rv� Ln grow; O 1 2 1 O o 1 North Tanager ga "' y i 20 N Arm Maxwell Q _r 1 Lake O Cl� ' i 4. 2 s 1 1 2 �o gay French 1 1 4902 Sunnyfield Road E 2 10 1 Forest �l Marsh 6 ; Jennings I 3 Lake 1 7 15 9 1 1 q Bay 4300 1 2 17 1 O If • �• with gracketts 1 2 , ' 1 Point 02 O I Arn Crystal gohns rn 1 gay Point,• '�•.� J* I Luxe O� 2B� i •mss ®185001 0 2 6 1 11 14 1 q 1 4 ;rn Ave 2 1 0 a1`3 8= 1l) 6q i 1 q 3 2 5.1 2O No�{�e 1 ® 1 1 1 137001 O (1 c 1O 1 4) 1 1 �J 1 15 3 1 9 397 LegendO 3 O 4' �'• •' •� e 1• � ' ,• �• _' •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds O 1 �= Carman's • 2 1 gay 3 •� ♦'• 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams q 2 9 . •` ,.' 3 � •� 8 '' 0 0 3,500 •� �• . _.. _.. _.. _.. – 5 Feet '• �. Cas 2O 0 �3O Source: Met. Council, City of Orono,• • • . – Poi 1 10 J) Hennepin County, MnDOT • • – • • – q�O Ln W efts ty W w O 1 8 Ak n N Q ® . �O o N 7-11 2 1O� � 2-- O © 9 1 2 0 n Traffic and Crash Information Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) O #### 2015 #### 2014 1 #### 2013 2012 Non -Motorized Crashes (2006 - 2015) Pedestrian 0% Bicycle Intersection Summary (2006-2015) ® Total Crashes Severity Summary (Quantity) Q Incapacitating Injuries Fatalities Non -Intersection Crashes (2006-2015) Incapacitating Injury Fatal Injury Figure T-4 v 0 0 0;_ a1 c - R r rn 365 0 Z5 Game F 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN co 0 Turner Road o 12 O OO Drake Dr 3 N i� ,d C O � U RJ 5800- 6500 520010 's \ m' 0 LO M M 0 +. J\\e�Q• 1� Moline Road � -7a] ❑ � 4000 6 4500 Z + E °m *o i ~' 6500*6th Ave N c Dicke 1Z 0 : o Lake o je *�9-ZW.2_ m tr —° Sni�n Dutch Lake 1850 Legend 1-1 Z Stubbs Bay eco® West 1 An» Harrison . . Bay 1 •�.. _.. _.. _ ; 0�1— .r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT 1° Lon 4900; 7400, �•-�•. Lake O 12 Daniels St_ 7,>00 •1 0 Orchard t n WayZa, Ota NL =y Grand Ave � � � f i o .. 870 ' 1850 0 Cn 480.zJ o O 1�0 M • HT1 m N - 1000 Fox St 9I Brow; ♦Q,o Tanager. Bay 1 Maxwell p - Lake Bay y French 1 Marsh 4600 r 1 4300 , + Smith Bracketts 1 Bay Point Crystal Bohn ♦•• �. 1 Bay Point,• ��•.�� �• L r= 1 1 1 1%1700 "W Ar- SO�o . _ Lafayette 1 • _,Bay .9 `. .00 e Q 40..,00 Spring 1 Park Carman's Bay 1 Bay •� M LE r ♦.' A". c dl e,. � Cas. Por 1 Existing Traffic Volume BOLTON March 2018 i & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. Y Moone' �+ �d P Tro510th Av _ =moo= .. w lake y� 940 O 19th Ave N' J 21 i N o ad ASO10000 - 0 14600 Lo t f`' Lydiard o N Lake i 275 _ 1 0. c l u_ Lake akP� 0 i 12 N Wayzata Bay H 4�Ru� H N E 1 9 0 11600 Minnetonka e.` 3 i d 14100 L � o' I rn S'4sse p r -r - Day PI Traffic Information Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) #### 2015 #### 2013 #### 2014 2012 Figure T-4 a 0 0 v c R .c L. N 3 E 0 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M co Turner Road o 0! w Drake Dr = 0 U 26 Paint W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E �a 0 o: is m Game Farm Road E Dutch Lake Legend �a sal_ 12ke Moline Road County Road `6'�I_ '-A North Arm Forest Lake 3 Jenning's 1 p^ Bay 1 f C West 1 Arm c� Harrison Bay 1 ; City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT 0 It Existing Non -Motorized Facilities & RBTN BOLTON March 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. yrrr\\■ w\ itReal Stubbs Bay y 1 _1 0„ — A sir"reolot long I.0 Z rio- J 0 9tihtiAve X - 13th Ave N Zt �.ajS > 4th Ave N *RSL � .. � ♦ �y � �' y E : ♦ �� 12 Park St B ♦♦♦ �1 1 L Rlce SwaY,>ata Blvd E ♦♦�� Maxwell Bay French Marsh Fox St ` � `ca Brow, F0 anager Bay Lake Smith Brackett, Point F ',�� e e rVP, wayr12 -El \ of r r r, •.♦ . -o ., .. D� ♦♦IJ�1�. ; 0 ♦♦ o � � U Non -Motorized Facilities & Points of Interest I Points of Interest 1 0 Marinas ! © Navarre Crystal Bohr Bay Point ••� j*V1 •, 1 1 • 1 Lafayette 1 — ■—••—. Bay 1 e ' Spri%_ / !' Park Carman's jw Bay ► Bev ♦ �•' Adr� ' i'• ewe •. ` Ca �•� Poi, 1 �.._.._.._ e�tsty © Orono High School ♦♦ Orono Ice �. Moon © • R■ .1 School O Z E■ �♦ ~ School ©. 0 c 0 •• ♦♦♦ `� Roan 1 Lak School Q Other Trails 11\V ©Z m �Sp<�n Lydiard **N♦N�* ra some pl■ r.+• ♦\\�' 0 /^v & Trails ` �0 m 12 Daniels St R • t • ard��n Wayzata Blvd lot !v ♦ ; m 'Z _ .v and AveLL , t ��' % ! Stubbs Bay y 1 _1 0„ — A sir"reolot long I.0 Z rio- J 0 9tihtiAve X - 13th Ave N Zt �.ajS > 4th Ave N *RSL � .. � ♦ �y � �' y E : ♦ �� 12 Park St B ♦♦♦ �1 1 L Rlce SwaY,>ata Blvd E ♦♦�� Maxwell Bay French Marsh Fox St ` � `ca Brow, F0 anager Bay Lake Smith Brackett, Point F ',�� e e rVP, wayr12 -El \ of r r r, •.♦ . -o ., .. D� ♦♦IJ�1�. ; 0 ♦♦ o � � U Non -Motorized Facilities & Points of Interest I Points of Interest 1 0 Marinas ! © Navarre Crystal Bohr Bay Point ••� j*V1 •, 1 1 • 1 Lafayette 1 — ■—••—. Bay 1 e ' Spri%_ / !' Park Carman's jw Bay ► Bev ♦ �•' Adr� ' i'• ewe •. ` Ca �•� Poi, 1 �.._.._.._ e�tsty 5; Regional Trails //'� Dakota Rail Lake Independence Lake Minnetonka ` LRT Luce Line Tier 1 RBTN Alignment Tier 2 RBTN Alignment Tier 2 RBTN Corridor Regional Trail Search Corridors Regional Trails - 2040 System Additions Figure T-6 It 20i © Orono High School 0 Orono Ice Orono © Intermediate School O Orono Middle School Schumann fir° Q Elementary Lak School Q Other Trails 11\V Existing Planned **N♦N�* Local Sidewalks /^v & Trails 5; Regional Trails //'� Dakota Rail Lake Independence Lake Minnetonka ` LRT Luce Line Tier 1 RBTN Alignment Tier 2 RBTN Alignment Tier 2 RBTN Corridor Regional Trail Search Corridors Regional Trails - 2040 System Additions Figure T-6 It 20i 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� 4�' Orono, MN Existing and Planned Transit InfrastructureBOLTON March 20180 & MEN K Real People. Real Solutions. Moot Turner Road o� a! , 1 2 ... _ .. _ .. _ ..�\. Stae i.._. _�..�.... �.. / �� Lake it �� ...__.._. �.._Lake o .. .. • s■ i •■ ■7 •. . •'W l0 _ Drake Dr o = I0 Z Z Z � •' v r= a c o 0 6th Ave N d 1 _ 3 W 3 X \oa ° Lake M o ; .���� a� G K r We N Clasen R m SpLydiard Long Lake qac /6 Paint W Branch Road 0 Z m Game Far Dutch Lake Legend E 0 1Z low 0 I \ Q•�av oIM_o Moline Road O. s� m 0H'ry 19 N i 04 19 too • eaYsjae oStubbsBay 'County Road 151 North Arm Maxwell '�Z Bay Forest Z Lake D 3 rc Jenning's 1 p� Bay '0 1 0 Z Y:Pky ""' • `• Lake 12 Daniels St • 1 �_ French Marsh t i I Fox St 4 ■ i .F 1 Brow; Bay Lake 7 e I I Smit';Bracketts Point West �••• �• 1 1 Ann Crystal Bohns •' • �. (y Bay Pnint••� 1 � Harrison .. — .♦ e • �' Bay .line Dr ��� + ■ 1 Lafayette 1 e� 6 m,-�® m •_ •_••_. 7C Bay �' 1 e City Limits Lakes & Ponds s Sprinc Park Carman's �� ,. 1 ate„ � ♦.' 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams a .♦• 0 3,500 Qc Feet eHr `'•�• ca ♦•• Po Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT— �l 12 8th Ave N E Wayzata Bay Ce/ Transit Infrastructure N aPark and Ride Transit Advantages Lak Q Existing HOT Lane �Q ar Transit Routes Meter Bypass lO Transit Centers Shoulder Lane 0 Transit Stops Figure T-7 c J 2040 Comprehensive Plan •,� 4�' Orono, MN M 00 Turner Road o { it I.. Drake Dr 3 0 U Freight, Rail, and Heavy Commercial Corridors BOLTON March 2018 i & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. �JZO� Katrina �` r- .12 Star o Moog M— •.ten .. — .. —s.—. r—,.._.a.....�r....�..+.� �• m•f- F i.att� .. `° Q C Lake ° z E = i Z P-ja o `o �^ ~ 6th Ave N c c Dick �e N ° Cb z SPONLydiard Long Lake is 1150 1200, 1350 ""' * Lake °aa d m° v 12 Daniels St 7� 1 O LL 10.0 ��'0 d w O chard�Ln 14 WaYTaf9, Or Moline Road �112. e m 14GandASQA. 19 N jM 0 19th Ave 8th Ave N N U) � .%'"' *`moi ...,L -Ji .. yi -� ��� m � . , r ' —10 ' • .. o `E 2350 H� R CY90 `/� i .r 12 Park Sf F l r 9hH,d J m 1 Rice S �JZahta Blvd E N . I. r Ftcn•- w fake gt Paiute r 1 U °m F U- 3 Fox St L . - • eQ, W Branch Road V dN`epl Ln �•r 1 i cam �' 'County Road 1517F�rench Brow, Fey Wayzata 1 'a Tanager Bay �• Bay lll��f MaxI, Lake e Bay Sunnyfield Road E Forest ZLL Ice/ 1V z Lake D 1 r r o° c Jenning's 1 p� 01 Oc Bay m 1 N Shore Dr 0< Game Farm Road E �• �� ayth Bracketts w _ ,• � Point 0 i West ♦.' I o' Dutch ° 1 Arm Crystal c ' Lake > C7 Bay Pnint ••' • . m 1 , Harrison .. - .' • �' •� Bay E ' Lynwood Blvd c ' - • • - .. - .. . �• pts 1 1 Shoreline or eye -- ■ 1 Awa 5� •'�•-� Lafayette 1 e� - ,� - ._..-.• Bay 1 Legend �• �'y �'• ' • ♦♦. e City Limits Lakes & Ponds a Spri%- I ! -..� • �� Park Carman's o Bay ► Bav •� ♦• 1 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams a' ♦ ®. of •• •� I � 0 3,500 �� '•� ♦. ♦ .-.._.._.._.._.. Feet e1N ' �• Ca Po, 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. MnDOT Hennepin County, • • - / k L Corridors and Information Z c J aTruck Highway Heavy Commercial Average I Corridors Daily Traffic (HCAADT) La �Qar Tier 2 #### 2012 Tier 3 #### 2016 Railroad Class 1 Figure T-8 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4B SANITARY SEWER PLAN Page Introduction 413-2 Existing Sanitary Sewer System 413-3 Table 4B-1 Lift Stations 4B-5 Table 413-2 Sanitary Sewer Agreements 413-6 Table 4B-3 Existing ISTS Systems 413-7 Forecasts 4B-7 Table 4B-4 Sewer Allocation Forecasts 4B-8 Table 413-5 MCES Projections 413-9 Table 4B-6 Sanitary Sewer Flow 4B-9 Table 413-7 Sanitary Sewer Projections 413-10 Table 4B-8 Interceptors 4B-11 Table 413-9 Septic Projections 413-11 Table 4B-10 Septic Projections 4B-12 Inflow And Infiltration 4B-12 Table 4B-11 I&I Infiltration 413-13 Orono Goals and Policies 413-14 Future Sanitary Sewer System 413-15 Table 4B-12 Priorities 4B-15 Table 413-13 Projects 413-16 Table 4B-14 Maintenance 4B-17 Appendix A. MCES Facility Map B. Orono Sanitary Sewer Maps C. ISTS Map D. Orono Ordinances Related to Waste Water E. Discharge Ordinance City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 1 CMP Part 413. Sanitary Sewer Plan INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to prepare a Community Management Plan that aligns with the Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan System Plan every ten years per Minnesota Rule 473.858. An important part of the Community Management Plan is the Sanitary Sewer Plan, which describes the existing sanitary sewer system and outlines the timing and sequence of future improvements. The Sanitary Sewer Plan allows the City and Metropolitan Council to build and improve their sanitary sewer collection and treatment systems so that development can occur in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. This document serves as the sanitary sewer component for the City of Orono's 2040 Community Management Plan. The City of Orono's Sanitary Sewer Plan was developed to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's Thrive MSP 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The Thrive MSP 2040 Plan was approved in May 2015 and outlines regional goals for the wastewater system, including environmental sustainability, water reuse, and water conservation. Additionally, the Thrive MSP 2040 Plan includes population, household, and employment projections, and projected wastewater flows. As a result of projected population increases and land use changes in Orono, the Metropolitan Council estimates that sanitary sewer flows will increase approximately 20% between 2010 and 2040. This Sanitary Sewer Plan serves as a guiding document for City infrastructure improvements and expansion. It also outlines the locations in which the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) can expect to see increased wastewater flows, allowing the Council to determine if capacity upgrades will be required at regional wastewater treatment plants and interceptors. Background The City of Orono is located in western Hennepin County and is bordered by Medina to the north, Wayzata and Plymouth to the east, and Minnetrista and Independence to the West. The Cities of Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach are completely contained within Orono. The City of Orono is primarily residential and is dominated in the south by Lake Minnetonka. Approximately 34% of the City is covered by lakes and wetlands. Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan for conversion of low density residential uses to higher density residential uses, and expansion of the existing urban service area will occur only within a few specifically planned areas. Therefore, the goals, plans and programs for on-site sewage treatment in rural Orono are intended to be permanently self-sufficient. Potential future demands on regional capacity will be primarily from the retrofitting of existing rural residential neighborhoods where sewer is readily available and where residents are willing to pay the costs associated with its installation. The goals, policies and facilities plans contained in this plan are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040 and beyond. These statistics and programs are primarily applicable to the urban areas of Orono and to the municipal sanitary sewer facilities which serve or are planned to serve these areas. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 2 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS Land Use Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. The citizens of Orono have decided that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area, and with the legislative intent of metropolitan planning such that expensive urban services not be over extended into undeveloped areas. Sewering of the urban area was necessary. The character and historic density of land use in the existing urban area of Orono, coupled with its general proximity to Lake Minnetonka both required and economically justified the installation of sanitary sewer to alleviate existing health and environmental problems. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shore land and within the MUSA have been provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Residences, existing or proposed within the designated Shore land Overlay District and within the MUSA for which municipal sewer service was requested were and shall be provided with municipal sewer. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Metropolitan Council Facilities The MCES owns, operates and maintains interceptor sewer and facilities in Orono as indicated in the map at Appendix A. The Orono system is serviced by MCES meters; M431 and M435. Sewage flows from southern Orono are metered at MCES Meter M435. Flows from north central Orono are metered at MCES Meter M431. MCES maintains six lift stations within Orono; L44, L45, L46, L49, L59 and L60. All sewage outflow from Orono is conveyed to and treated at MCES's Blue Lake Treatment Plant on the Minnesota River in Shakopee. Orono's sewer service capacity is limited by the capacity of the intervening interceptors including the Orono -Long Lake Interceptor, and not strictly by the capacity of the Blue Lake Facility. Orono Sanitary Sewer System The City of Orono owns, operates and maintains municipal sanitary sewer facilities as indicated on the Map bellow. Orono's sanitary sewer system currently consists of approximately 245,131 ft of Sewer Main, 80,530 ft of Force Main, 1292 Manholes and 44 lift stations, of which a majority was built within the last 50 years. The City of Orono's existing Sanitary Sewer System limits are defined by the boundaries of the Municipal Utility Service Area (MUSA). Because of topography and historic development patterns, the Orono municipal sewer system includes a number of disconnected sections which can be categorized into 5 distinct service areas. In addition the topography of the area has resulted in the City constructing 44 Lift Stations. A map of the Orono System is at Appendix B. 1. Southwest Orono System(MCES metershed M435): This system consists of two sub systems; the Lift Station 59 system and the downstream interceptors system. The Lift Station 59 system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to MCES Lift Station #59 (LS -59). The system was constructed with eighteen projects from 1964 to2007. This is the original City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 3 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan municipal sewer system and it still serves the majority of urban Orono. These lines were installed to provide pollution abatement and sewer service to the Navarre business area and to the urban residential areas along Lake Minnetonka. The downstream interceptors system consists of all trunk and lateral lines which directly discharge to the Orono -Long Lake Interceptor (MCES 7113 and 7113A) downstream from L.S. 59 but upstream of Meter # 435. These direct discharges are via City -owned and maintained lift stations pumping into the MCES force main at a limited number of locations. Construction occurred during 1980-2014. 2. Highway 12 Area System (MCES metershed M431): This system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to LS -60. Construction consisted of sixteen Projects from 1967 to 2018. This portion of the municipal system was initially constructed as an extension of the Long Lake municipal system primarily to provide sewer (and water) service to the Orono High School. This system currently serves all of the urban and commercial area in the North West portion of the city along the County Road 6 and 112 corridor. 3. Long Lake Connections. This system consist of all of the lines that connect directly into the Long Lake Municipal Sewer System. The system was constructed in a series of projects from 1970 to 2018. 4. Wayzata System Extensions: Sewer laterals which connect to extensions of the Wayzata sewer system along Orono's eastern boundary. Construction consisted of six Projects 1970-2009. This portion of the Orono municipal sewer system functions as an extension of the Wayzata system serving existing housing adjacent to the Wayzata border. 5. Plymouth Direct Connection. The City has one property directly connected to the Plymouth municipal system, St. Edwards Church on North Ferndale Road. No further connections to the Plymouth system are anticipated. 6. Lift Stations. The Orono Sanitary Sewer system is serviced by 44 Lift Stations, listed on Table 4B-1: Lift Stations. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 4 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4B-1: Lift stations LS # Type Address Street SCADA Generator Flow (GPM) Met Council Meter LS -1 Lift 1302 Shoreline Dr Yes 60 M435 LS -2 Lift 1970 Spates Ave Yes Yes 500 M435 LS -3 Lift 3400 Eastlake St Yes 125 M435 LS -4 Lift 160 Stubbs Bay Rd 100 M435 LS -5 Lift 351 Westlake St Yes 200 M435 LS -6 Lift 2478 Casco Point Rd Yes Yes 360 M435 LS -7 Lift 2552 Shadywood Rd Yes 240 M435 LS -8 Lift 2662 West Lafayette Rd Yes 70 M431 LS -9 Lift 1580 Bohns Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -10 Lift 115 Orono Orchards Rd 105 M435 LS -11 Lift 1815 Fagerness Pout Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -12 Lift 2030 Wayzata Blvd Yes Yes 240 M435 LS -13 Lift 2919 Casco Point Rd Yes 140 M435 LS -14 Lift 1580 Orchard Beach PI Yes Yes 250 M435 LS -15 Lift 1375 VINE PL Yes 200 M435 LS -16 Lift 1385 Rest Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -17 Lift 1074 Wildhurst Tr Yes 100 M435 LS -18 Lift 1330 CHERRY PL Yes Yes 200 M435 LS -19 Lift 1030 Loma Linda Ave Yes 100 M435 LS -20 Lift 1101 Elmwood Ave Yes Yes 100 M435 LS -21 Lift 4265 Forest Lake Dr Yes Yes 100 M435 LS -22 Lift 2890 Shoreline Dr Yes 100 M435 LS -23 Lift 3017 North Shore Dr Yes 100 M435 LS -24 Lift 4015 Dahl Rd 250 M435 LS -25 Lift 780 North Arm Dr Yes 250 M435 LS -26 Lift 1207 Tonkawa Rd Yes Yes 400 M435 LS -27 Lift 870 Partenwood Rd Yes 250 M435 LS -28 Lift 632 Park Ln Yes Yes 325 M435 LS -29 Lift 754 Tonkawa Rd Yes 250 M435 LS -30 Lift 1799 Lakeview Terrace Yes 100 M431 LS -31 Lift 1579 Long Lake Blvd Yes 130 M431 GS -1 Grinder 2635 North Shore Dr Yes 45 M435 GS -2 Grinder 1082 Ferndale Rd W Yes 35 M435 GS -3 Grinder 978 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -4 Grinder 907 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -5 Grinder 883 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -6 Grinder 1446 Shoreline Dr Yes 35 M435 GS -7 Grinder 2472 Carmen St 15 M435 GS -8 Grinder 1023 Old Crystal Bay Rd 20 M435 GS -9 Grinder 1222 Bracket's Point Rd Yes 39 M435 GS -10 Grinder 2048 Shoreline Dr 57 M435 GS -11 Grinder 3980 Dahl Rd 15 M435 GS -30 Grinder 988 Partenwood Rd 15 M435 GS -31 Grinder 994 North Arm 15 M435 7. Agreements with Adjacent Cities. In order to provide municipal sanitary service in the most cost effective manner the City of Orono partners with neighboring cities. Orono residents are City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 5 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan served by connection to Plymouth, Long Lake and Wayzata. Orono provides service to residents from Wayzata, Spring Park and Medina. Table 4B-2 below lists the current agreements with other municipalities. Table 413-2: Sanitary Sewer Agreements with Adjacent Cities Cities Involved Date Properties Affected Orono/Wayzata 6-3-70 Properties on North Ferndale Road Orono/Long Lake 10-7-75 Connection of Hackberry Neighborhood to LL Sewer. Orono/Wayzata 11-16- 76 "Herrick Circle" along Old Long Lake Road - MUSA Part IV Orono/Wayzata 6-8-81 Lots 104 & 105, Aud. Sub. No. 184; 865 and 885 West Ferndale Road - Part of MUSA Part VI Orono/ Long Lake 6-17-86 650 North Brown Road connection to LL Sewer Orono/Wayzata 8-25-03 Properties along Old Long Lake Road; supersedes 1976 agreement Orono /Long Lake/ Medina 8-10-81 Includes MUSA Parts II, III, X, XIX, XX, XXIX and XXX Orono/Plymouth 1-11-00 St. Edwards Church, 865 North Ferndale Road Orono/Long Lake 10-3-00 Fox Ridge and East Long Lake Areas (MUSA Parts XXI and XXIII Orono/Spring Park 4-24-00 Property at 3800 Dickson Extension Orono/Long Lake 12-14- 11 Creekside properties that ultimately discharge to Long Lake sewer lines Orono/Wayzata 7-21-09 Orono properties that ultimately discharge to Wayzata sewer lines - combination of all previous agreements into one new agreement City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 6 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Orono Private Treatment Systems The City of Orono's rural areas are served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). A map of existing ISTS's in Orono is at Appendix C. Orono Code regulating ISTS can be found in Appendix D. This Chapter 58 is consistent with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regulations adopted as (Minnesota Rules Chapters 7080-7083). The provisions specify technical standards, site evaluations, sizing requirements, and minimum setbacks from floodplains and wetlands for individual systems. Every three years the City notifies homeowners to provide maintenance to their septic systems and submit inspection reports to the City. If a complaint is submitted about a septic system, the city is responsible for performing an inspection of the system. Based on City building records, an inventory of septic services is listed below: Table 413-3: Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (2018) Residential 1024 Institutional (Churches, Golf courses) 5 Total On -Site systems 1029 Source: City Building Records FORECASTS Land Use Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities of 1-3 units per acre. Urban commercial development will be restricted to neighborhood services in the existing Navarre Area and fuller utilization of the industrial and commercial potential near Long Lake. Overall urban density will remain relatively low because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a slow, steady pace in a manner similar to that of the past three decades. Strict subdivision review will ensure adequate retention of privately maintained open space, wetland conservation, and on-site system site evaluation. Non-residential development will be limited to open space recreation. The majority of the rural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. When wetlands, roads, steep slopes and public open space are factored in, nearly 80% of the City's land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 7 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Population The Metropolitan Council publishes population and sewer usage forecasts for each city in the Metropolitan Area. MCES use these growth and wastewater flow forecasts to plan future interceptor and treatment works to serve communities. The forecast data in the table below is from the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Community Page for Orono and includes both total and sewered population, households, and employment. Table 4B-4: Sewer Allocation Forecasts by type Forecast Year Forecast Component Population Households Employment 2010 MCES Sewered 45429 1,780 1,562 2010 Septic 3,008 1,046 0 2020 MCES Sewered 5,150 2,105 1,700 2020 Septic 2,950 1,095 0 2030 MCES Sewered 6,170 2,455 1,780 2030 Septic 2,630 1,105 0 2040 MCES Sewered 6,740 2,785 1,800 2040 Septic 2,760 1,115 0 Source: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Flows All of the existing and anticipated sewage flow from the City of Orono is treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. The treatment plan currently processes 26 Million Gallons Per day and has a planned capacity of 40 million gallons per day by 2040 (Council, 2016). The CSPP element of the 1980 CMP indicated an ultimate interceptor design capacity assigned to Orono of 3,025 units based on a flow of 368 gpd per unit (115 gal/person/day x 3.2 persons/household) totaling 1.14 mgd or 416 million gallons per year (MGY). Under current projections which include land use changes proposed in the Land Use Plan of this 2018-2040 CMP, potential Orono flow rates will slightly exceed the annual flows forecasted by Met Council through 2040 but remain below the ultimate design capacity. The paragraphs and tables below depict the MCES and Orono projections. MCES Projections Table 4B-5 below lists projected total average wastewater flow for Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 8 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4B-5: MCES Sewered Wastewater Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Av. Annual Wastewater Flow (MGD)l 0.58 0.59 0.65 0.72 1 From: Metropolitan Council Water Resources Policy Plan, Pg 70. As a point of reference Table 413-6 below depicts the amount of Orono wastewater delivered into the MCES system from 2012-2016. Table 4B-6: Sanitary Sewer Flow from Orono 2012-2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Annual Average Flow in MGD 0.48 0.57 0.63 0.49 0.54 Total Flow in MGY 177.21 207.73 228.52 177.27 199.00 Orono Projections Orono's projects are based on the planned development of the existing Municipal Service Areas. The current and projected connections are shown in the table below broken down by Sewer Service Areas. Note that the projections used in this report are greater than the MCES projections since they rely on flow estimates for each parcel of developable land, rather than population estimates. Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) The table uses Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) to convert non-residential connection into their residential equivalents. The project flows are calculated based on 1 REC = 250 Gallons / Day (1 REC = 2.5 residents x 100 gal/resident/day). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 9 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 411-7: Sanitary Sewer Projections by Interceptor Orono Sewer 2020 2030 2040 Service 2010 REC 2020 REC 2030 REC 2040 Area REC Change REC Change REC Change REC M431 458 41 499 140 639 38 677 M435 593 41 634 0 634 66 700 Wayzata 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 Long Lake 372 49 421 140 561 76 637 Plymouth 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Total 2591 99 2690 203 2893 383 3276 Orono 2020 2030 2040 Sewer 2010 Flow 2020 Flow 2030 Flow 2040 Service flow Change Flow Change Flow Change Flow Area (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) M431 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.17 M435 0.15 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.02 0.18 Wayzata 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Long Lake 0.09 0.01 0.11 0.04 0.14 0.02 0.16 Plymouth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.65 0.02 0.67 0.05 0.72 0.10 0.82 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 10 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Projections for MCES Interceptors. The MCES interceptors forecasted flow are listed in the table below. The interceptors are in series: 8352A ->7113A->7113 and 8567->7113. Note the flow depicted is only Orono generated flows that are received within Orono and Long Lake. Orono generated flows that go to Wayzata or Plymouth are not included as they ultimately end up at interceptors 7018-2 and 7027-1. Also, note that the total flow listed is only the flow generated in Orono and does not include any flows from neighboring communities that may also discharge into the particular interceptor. Table 413-8: Interceptors MCES Interceptor 2010 now (MGD) 2020 Flow (MGD) 2030 Flow (MGD) 2040 Flow (MGD) 8352A & 7113A 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.17 8567 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.52 7113 0.55 0.57 0.61 0.69 Private Systems Rural areas of Orono will continue to be served by individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). Sanitary sewers and other urban services will not be extended into the rural area to promote new development or expansion of urbanization. The city does not foresee much increased density in the rural area requiring additional ISTS. Within the rural area, nearly all water supplies are provided by individual wells and most sewage treatment is provided by individual sewage treatment systems ("ISTS"). A number of specific neighborhoods within the Rural Area have been or will be provided with municipal sewers to solve neighborhood problems or to protect the lakes, but no other urban services are planned for these areas. MCES Projections Table 413-9: Septic (MCES Unsewered) Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Septic (Un-Sewered) Population 3,008 2,950 2,630 2,760 Septic (Un-Sewered) Households 1,046 1,095 1,105 1,115 Septic (Un-Sewered) Employment 0 0 0 0 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 11 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City Of Orono Projections The table below depicts the projected number of septic systems in Orono based on development projections for the rural area. Table 4B-10: Septic Projections 1 2010 2020 2030 —0 2040 Institutional Septic Systems 5 5 5 5 Residential Septic Systems 1041 1024 1100 1110 Total Septic Systems 10451 10292 1105 1115 1. Actual number from 2008 2. Actual number from ISTS data base as of 2018 3. City Staff Estimates INFLOW AND INFILTRATION General Inflow is water, typically stormwater, which enters the sewer system through broken manhole covers, sewer cleanouts, sump pumps, foundation drains, and rain leaders. Infiltration is water, typically groundwater, which leaks into the sewer system through cracks in the sewer mains, laterals, joints, and manholes. Water from inflow and infiltration (1/I) can consume available capacity in the wastewater collection system and increase the flow into treatment facilities. In extreme cases, the added flow can cause bypasses or overflows of raw wastewater. This extra flow also requires a larger capacity in the city's collection and treatment components, which results in increased capital, operation and maintenance, and replacement costs. As a sewer system ages and deteriorates, 1/I can become an increasing burden on a City's system. Therefore, it is imperative that I/I be reduced whenever it is cost effective to do so. The MCES has established 1/I goals for each community discharging wastewater into the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) based on average day flows and allowable peaking factors. In February 2006, the MCES began an I/I Surcharge Program which requires communities within their service area to eliminate excessive I/I over a period of time. Now, communities that exceed their wastewater flow program year goals, will be required to complete an UI mitigation assignment that will be required to be implemented in 2018. Nonetheless, flow metering data is available for the meter sheds within Orono, and an analysis of this data as it relates to 1/I is presented on the following page. The City's strategies, programs, investments, and goals for reducing 1/I are listed in this section as well City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 12 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Municipal I/I Reduction Much of the City's sewer infrastructure is over 40 years old, and susceptible to I/I due to their age. In addition much of the city system runs along lake shore and is susceptible to high water periods. City code prohibits the discharge of storm water to the sanitary sewer system and requiring the disconnection of existing 1/I sources (Sec. 14-189. - Prohibited discharges of groundwater/stormwater into the sanitary sewerage system). The city does experience a high amount of home rebuilds, especially along the lake shore which coincides with a large portion of the municipal sewer system. All new construction is inspected for possible cross connection as part of the sewer connection permit process. In addition, the City has routine activities directed at recognizing and correcting UI. During the City's annual sewer system maintenance activities, 20% of the system is cleaned and televised to locate leaks or service connections with continuous flows. Appropriate corrective measures are then initiated with the affected property owner. The results of the inspections are used to develop and prioritize the City's sewer rehabilitation projects. For the past 5 years and programmed in to the future the city allocates $250,000 per years for sewer improvement projects to address I&I issues. W-- Table 4B-11: Recently Completed I& I Reduction Projects Project Description Cost 2013 Sewer Lining of 4288 feet of gravity main; Manhole lining and $136,786 Rehabilitation Project joint sealing 2014 Sewer Lining of 4000 feet of gravity main; 4 manhole $239,167 Rehabilitation Project rehabilitations 2015 Sewer Lining of 4,915 feet of gravity main; 35 Lateral linings; $246,198 Rehabilitation Project 11 Manhole rehabilitations 2016 Sewer Lining 6,091 feet of gravity main; 20 Manholes joint $215,177 Rehabilitation Project sealed 2017 Sewer Lining 5026 feet of gravity main $213,338 Rehabilitation Project City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 13 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan ORONO GOALS AND POLICIES Goals 1. To provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all residences and other occupied properties in the City. 2. To protect Lake Minnetonka, other lakes and streams, surface and ground waters from sewage effluent pollution. 3. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens without becoming an intolerable burden on the landowners or taxpayers. Policies 1. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Urban Service Area will be municipal sewer. 2. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Rural Area will be individual on-site systems, because: a. The cost of providing municipal sewer service to the Rural Area is high due to the low density of development and due to the varied topography. b. Development of the Rural Area at densities which would keep the cost of municipal sewer low, would be counterproductive to the City's primary goal of protecting Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. 3. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 4. Orono will provide municipal sewer extensions to lakeshore areas and non-lakeshore areas within the MUSA when it is determined that municipal sewer is preferable to long-term use of on-site sewage treatment systems. 5. The costs of extending municipal sewer to existing neighborhoods will be borne primarily by the property owners being served. 6. The costs of extending municipal sewer to serve new residential and nonresidential development will be borne entirely by the developer. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 14 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan FUTURE SA NITA R Y SE WER SYSTEM Orono's Plan for future sewer facilities includes upgrades to certain existing local sewer facilities as well as retrofitting a small number of existing neighborhoods with municipal sewer service. These system improvements and expansions are not expected to require additional capacity allocation in metropolitan sewer facilities. MUSA Expansion The city has no plans for expansion of the MUSA within the time period covered by this plan. Future demands on the sanity sewer system will come as areas within the existing MUSA develop. While the City has no staged development plan, and currently has not scheduled projects outside the existing MUSA, any future MUSA expansions will be considered within the context of the following guidelines: Priority. The city will use the priorities outlined in Table 413-12 to assess whether or not to request a MUSA expansion. Table 4B-12: Priorities EX 0 E Priority 1 Properties that abut the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and all other Orono lakes Priority 2 Properties that abut City -protected tributaries, and all other properties within the Shoreland Overlay District. Priority 3 Existing substandard developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems and do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 4 New development using clustering that permanently preserves blocks of open space. Priority 5 Conforming developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems and do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 6 New or existing development not covered by Priorities 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5. Conditions Expansion of the MUSA on the established prioritized basis noted above will occur only when one of the following conditions is found: When an area of existing homes has failing or non -conforming septic systems and replacement drain field sites are not available for a significant share of the existing homes. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 15 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan 2. When an individual home has a failing or non -conforming septic system, does not have an alternate drain field site, is adjacent to existing sewer lines, and is not part of a neighborhood that could be better served by a neighborhood sewer lateral project. 3. When a new or existing residential development meeting all required development standards is adjacent to existing sewer lines and the developer or homeowners agree to bear all costs of extending municipal sewer to the development, but only when inclusion of such development in the MUSA will not result in a decrease in the City's sewered density as calculated by the Metropolitan Council. Future Sanitary Sewer Improvements The City's focus on future sanitary sewer needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area/ MUSA and maintenance to include I&I mitigation of the existing system. Future Sewer Expansion Proiects Table 4B-13 below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 413-13: Projects I—M Improvement Projected Triggering Year of Event completion 1 Orono Preserve Development – Sewer main to serve 39 2018 Under single family homes Construction 2 Shadywood Villas Development -Sewer Main to service 2018 Under 7 single family homes. Construction 3 Brackets Point Sewer Main Replacement – Replacement 20181 Development of the existing gravity main with a force main and lift Approval station. 4 CSAH 112 Sewer Main Extension- Extension of sewer 20191 Approved main West along CSAH 112 from Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary to serve future developments planned on the south side Plat for of CSAH 112. Developments 1 Schedule is dependent on development timing, size and/or location. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 16 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Future Sewer Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing sanitary sewer system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 413-14: Maintenance Program Description Purpose Annual Budget (2018$s) Annual sewer This project includes the cleaning and This project is part of the City $ 45,895 cleaning and inspection (televising) of 1/5 of the preventative maintenance program. inspections City's sewer mains each year. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs and identify possible sources of I&I. Annual Lift All 44 Lift and Grinder stations with in The results of the inspection are used $7,000 Stations the city are inspected annually. to determine future maintenance Inspections needs. Sewer Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (1&I) $ 265,225 Rehabilitation will consist of Cured in Place Pipe into the Sanitary sewer systems. The (CIPP) lining of infiltration susceptible lining process creates and new sanitary sewer pipes, manhole durable pipe within the older pipe at reconstruction, and lid replacement. a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling. Lift Station This project will rehabilitate 2 of the Ensure the reliability of the city's lift $ 110,000 Rehabilitations City's 46 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation station system. Allows City to includes the inspection, and provide extensive maintenance to replacement of a lift stations piping, each Lift Station once every 22 years. motors, pumps and control as well as repairs wet well. Backup Generator This project will provide a backup This project is part of a systematic $ 150,000 Installation generators for 2 Lift Stations per year. effort to provide backup power to critical City infrastructure. Sewer System This project will see the provision of This is a continuation/ expansion of $ 26,000 Monitoring electronic monitoring of 4 additional the project begun in 2016. As of Lift Stations per year. This project will 2017 the city has 30/46 lift stations upgrade/replace components of the being electronically monitored. The monitoring system including antennas, provision of electronic monitoring cabling, and uninterruptable power for all of the city's lift stations will supply (UPS). improve response time to issues, reduce backup incidents and provide real time monitoring and reporting for accountability. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 17 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan MCES Sanitary Sewer deter Service Areas City of Orono, Hennepin County V34 Independer l Minnetrista To Meter # M429A Mound i Spring Park 1 + To Meter M4,e Ild 5ho .A I Medina NEW Ta Meter Plymouth i! M4$9 F To Meter i # M118 83524 Lang ' To Meter Lake + �J -�- - - e� To Meter To Meter-_ --- # M437 _ 4 I Orono Wayzata i $ Woodland Minnetonka s Beach To Meter # M424 To Meier �'�I ❑eephaYen #Md29A Tonka Bay a� f Minnetonka �.�.,.� To Meter �J # M420 _, - To Meter _.�I # M412 Greenwood ._ Excelsior City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 413, Page 18 Mile¢ Interceptors by Type — Outfall ! ' Meters — Gravity — Law Head Crossing A Lift Stations — Forcemain Bypass — Siphon IIn�es++ LLW MCES Wastewater Treatment Plants Inb—pl.r Meter Service Areas To Meter # 1 D Frear Not Sereed j Areas of Unmetered Flow j County Boundares L. Park, Recreational or Preserve into the Community .----. L_City and Township Boundaries Golf Course Rural Center WWTP _j Service Areas Lakeland Rivers 2046 MUSA — MCompass Street Centerlines City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 413, Page 18 MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service Areas City of Orono, Hennepin County Maple Plain3 Medina ------------------ �� i To Meter # M431 Independence _ / r - To Meter #M118 8352 M —I 1� 8352A Long J To Meter Lake # M43�0 M I — , To Meter To Meter - _—"l # M437 r #'M429A I I� _ `Orono � � - L--� -' Wayzata ''la.2. Minnetrista To Meter #M429A 056A Mound �;\ i ``•�•'�- -------� � Minnetonka �_nnc 6so �. /M, Spring I Beach Park To Meter j # M429A To Meter�• TBnka� am# M423 •`' I Bay0 Mi J To Meter ■ !I # M420 s Shorewxce ood To Meter # M424 r% Deephaven �V - AO l 41 r M 'moi IMM &OH-rr6Qh 1 -Minnetonka T:"' # M412r N 0 0.5 t 2 3 1/6/2015 w+e S Miles Interceptors by Type Outfall Meters Gravity Low Head Crossing Q Lift Stations — Forcemain Bypass Siphon MCES Wastewater Treatment Plants Interceptor Meter Service Areas To Meter # 100 Areas of Unmetered Flow County Boundaries Park, Recreational or Preserve into the Community Rural Center WWTP •----• ----_I City and Township Boundaries Golf Course Service Areas Lakes and Rivers 2040 MUSA NCompass Street Centerlines 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M Turner o it w Drake Dr 3 0 U Legend Moline Road ];,.0 19 N 12 0�,- r.. .._..was ��. f • I ® I eays�ae ° d w Ps 0 m a 0 m m Lake Classen Existing Wastewater System&MEN K February 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. L � 0 / Y U E R ~ • 6th Ave N 1 Dicke, o� Like jKelley,71411 ti a ILr.i,Daniel t+ Long rd`\. YZ I L L L a j3 1 M •t����*� v �iI1:Y r -a � �' as i `° ° _ , 0 Fox St 0 f U �, Ps Ps d�`e.N Ln Ps P urity Road 151 � I Browns .2✓ {Bay r �= MaxwellAM ' PPs _., :, Bay French Marsh ' Jl Denning' I D Ag, Bay•�cPS N Shore Or o� ` PB J � West +� ' � ♦� 1 1 Ann ;DI' ' (9 ' i . 1 " Harrison .. I•. Bay I ' o. Gine Dr°� - ' ; • 1 Lafayette 1 -,.' \ •—;•r—•• Bay e City Limits Lakes & Ponds —.. r • a Spri%- 1 'i - CIUNTY 26 �A Park r Bay I 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 is 0 N b painte r Road N N `� W Branch Road 0 3,500 O� •' - Feet L110 J r Sunnyfield Road E 0 Z �i 0 N ) L, � m � Road E 0 Game Farm `) L 0 O o' U Dutch v Lake Legend Moline Road ];,.0 19 N 12 0�,- r.. .._..was ��. f • I ® I eays�ae ° d w Ps 0 m a 0 m m Lake Classen Existing Wastewater System&MEN K February 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. L � 0 / Y U E R ~ • 6th Ave N 1 Dicke, o� Like jKelley,71411 ti a ILr.i,Daniel t+ Long rd`\. YZ I L L L a j3 1 M •t����*� v �iI1:Y r -a � �' as i `° ° _ , 0 Fox St 0 f U �, Ps Ps d�`e.N Ln Ps P urity Road 151 � I Browns .2✓ {Bay r �= MaxwellAM ' PPs _., :, Bay French Marsh ' Jl Denning' I D Ag, Bay•�cPS N Shore Or o� ` PB J � West +� ' � ♦� 1 1 Ann ;DI' ' (9 ' i . 1 " Harrison .. I•. Bay I ' o. Gine Dr°� - ' ; • 1 Lafayette 1 -,.' \ •—;•r—•• Bay e City Limits Lakes & Ponds —.. r • a Spri%- 1 'i - �A Park r Bay I 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams is - ,' ♦' 0 3,500 O� •' - Feet ew •�• Ca Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT • Po �•. �'' — " — • • 1 — f Lydiard Lake J ,>q Lake z 19thlAve 8th Ave N —� _�VtCyI:11R:�� • - �1 qq� 4 Wayzata Bay 101 0 r Sanitary Sewer System N z c J o Sanitary Lift Sanitary Station Forcemain Sanitary Pipe MCES Interceptor Figure SW -15 Appendix D. City Ordinances relating to Sanitary Sewer and On -Site Sewage Disposal DIVISION 4. - SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL Subdivision I. - In General Sec. 14-166. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Industrial waste means any liquid, gaseous or solid waste substance resulting from any process of industry, manufacturing, trade or business, or from development of any natural resources. Sewage means water -carried waste products from residences, public buildings, institutions or other buildings or premises, including the excrement or other discharge from the bodies of human beings or animals, together with such groundwater infiltration and surface water as may be present. Sewerage service means the use of and benefit from the sewerage system, including the availability, collection, transportation, pumping, treatment and final disposal of sewage. Sewerage system includes all street lateral, main and intersecting sewers and structures by which sewage or industrial wastes are collected, transported, treated and disposed of; provided that this shall not include plumbing inside or a part of a building or premises served, or building sewers or service stubs from a building to the street lateral. Sec. 14-167. - Construction, maintenance and repair. The customer shall be responsible for all repairs and maintenance from the main to the house or other building. Secs. 14-168-14-185. - Reserved. Subdivision II. - Discharge Restrictions Sec. 14-186. - Classification of industrial wastes. The city shall have the power to classify the industrial wastes from any lot, parcel of land, building or premises discharged into the sewerage system of the city, taking into consideration the quantity of sewage produced and its concentration and composition, as specified in the Metro Waste Control Commission regulations, and of any other factors entering into the cost of its disposal, for the purpose of fixing and prescribing a distinct rate of rental or use charge. Should it be found that as to such sewer uses the water basis consumption does not provide a practicable method for the premises, but until so determined and such distinct rate fixed, the water consumption basis hereinbefore prescribed shall remain in full force and effect as to such commercial or industrial users. The city may require and prescribe pretreatment on the consumer's premises. Sec. 14-187. - Deleterious substances. No sewage, including industrial wastes, shall contain any substance which is deemed deleterious by the city to the operation of the sewerage system or to any plant or facilities used in the treatment or disposal of such sewage. If a user of the sewerage system discharges excessive loads or any deleterious substances therein which are likely to retard or injuriously affect sewerage operations, he shall discontinue such practice; and such practice is hereby declared to be a violation of this section. Each day of such violation continuing after having been notified in writing by the city clerk to discontinue such practice shall be deemed a separate violation. Sec. 14-188. - Unlawful discharge. It is unlawful to discharge any of the following described wastes into the sewerage system: (1) Liquids having a temperature higher than 150 degrees Fahrenheit. (2) Water or waste which contains more than 100 ppm by weight of fat, oil or grease. (3) Gasoline, benzene, naphtha, fuel oil or other flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas. (4) Garbage, except such as has been properly shredded. (5) Ashes, cinders, shavings, feathers, tar or other liquid or viscous substance capable of causing obstruction to the flow in the sewerage system or other interference with the proper operation of the system. (6) Noxious or malodorous substances capable of creating a public nuisance. Sec. 14-189. - Prohibited discharges of groundwater/stormwater into the sanitary sewerage system. (a) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, any stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage or cooling water to any sanitary sewer. Any person having a roof drain, sump pump, unauthorized swimming pool discharge, cistern overflow pipe or surface drain connected and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer shall disconnect and remove any piping or system conveying such water to the sanitary sewerage system. (b) Every person owning improved real estate that discharges into the city's sanitary sewerage system shall allow inspection by authorized city employees or its agents of all properties or structures connected to the sanitary sewerage system to confirm there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewerage system. In lieu of authorizing a city inspection of the property, the property owner may furnish a certificate from a licensed plumber, in a form acceptable by the city, certifying that the property has no prohibited discharge in the municipal sanitary sewer system. (c) Any owner of any property found to be in violation of this section shall make the necessary changes to comply with this division, and such change shall be verified by authorized city employees or agents. Any property or structure not inspected or not in compliance shall, following notification from the city, comply within 14 calendar days or be subject to the surcharge as provided in subsection (f) of this section. 2 (d) Existing buildings with sump pumps and all newly constructed buildings with sumps shall have a discharge pipe installed to the outside wall of the building. The pipe attachment must be of rigid permanent -type plumbing, such as PVC, copper or galvanized pipe. The discharge shall extend outside of the foundation and may not be pumped directly onto any public right-of-way unless approved by the public service director or his designee. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer shall be closed and repaired in compliance with applicable codes. (e) Upon verified compliance with this chapter, the city reserves the right to reinspect such property or structure or require the property owner to provide a certificate of compliance from a licensed plumber in a form acceptable to the city at least annually to confirm continued compliance. Any property found not to be in compliance upon reinspection by the city shall, following notification from the city, comply within 14 calendar days or be subject to the surcharge provided for in subsection (f) of this section. (f) A surcharge set by the annual fee schedule adopted by the city council is imposed and shall be added to every utility billing to properties not in compliance with this chapter. The surcharge shall be added to every quarterly utility billing until the property is in compliance as determined by the city. If the surcharge is not paid in a timely manner, the delinquent payments may be certified for collection with the following years' property taxes. (g) The city council, upon recommendation of the city administrator and the city engineer, shall hear and decide requests for temporary waivers from the provisions of this division where strict enforcement would cause a threat to public safety because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Any request for a temporary waiver shall be submitted to the city administrator in writing within 14 calendar days of notification of noncompliance. Upon approval of a temporary waiver from the provisions of this division, the property owner shall agree to pay an additional fee for sanitary sewerage services based on the number of gallons discharged into the sanitary sewerage system as estimated by the city engineer. (h) Stormwater and all other unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such drainage facilities as are specifically designated by the city engineer. (i) The imposition of the surcharge shall not limit the right of the city to seek an injunction in district court ordering the person to disconnect the nonconforming connection to the sanitary sewer or from pursuing any other legal remedies available; or in the alternative, the city may correct the violation and certify the costs of correction as an assessment against the property on which the correction was made. Secs. 14-190-14-210. - Reserved. ISTS Ordinances The provisions of Chapter 58 apply to all properties in the City, as follows: ARTICLE II. - ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSALu DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 58-41. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. Words and terms not defined in this section shall have those meanings as set forth in chapters 78 and 82 and Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. Absorption area means the area on original soil below a mound that is designed to absorb sewage tank effluent. The absorption area for trenches, seepage beds, and at grade systems is the area in contact with the part of the distribution medium that is designed to absorb sewage tank effluent. "Absorbtion area" is the area to which setbacks are measured for property lines, wells and the like. City sewer means a sewage collection system terminating in a treatment plant or Metropolitan Council, facilities, and not utilizing septic tanks or soil treatment and absorption areas. Code system means an ISTS which meets all the location, design and construction standards of this Code and which is not an "imminent threat to public health or safety" as defined in Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. Compliance inspection means an evaluation, investigation, inspection, or other process for the purpose of issuing a certificate of compliance or notice of non-compliance. Compliant system means an ISTS which does not meet all the location, design and construction standards of this Code but does meet the three-foot separation requirement, and which is not "failing" or an "imminent threat to public health or safety" as defined in Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. Construction means any action which in any way affects the physical components of any new or existing ISTS, including construction, installation, extension, alteration or repair, not to include pumping. Contractor means a person licensed under the provisions of Minnesota Rules chapter 7080 to engage in the business of site evaluation, system design, system construction and pumping. Disposal means the evaporation or absorption of purified liquids after treatment of the raw sewage. Existing system means any ISTS constructed and in use prior to the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived. "New systems" shall become "existing systems" at the time of final inspection and approval by the city. Failing system means any ISTS that discharges sewage to a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell or leaching pit. In addition, any ISTS posing an imminent threat to public health or safety as defined in Minnesota Rules chapter 7080 shall be considered failing. Inspection report means the official report of the results of the inspection by the city or private inspector, including any official orders to repair or replace a noncompliant or failing ISTS. Imminent threat to public health or safety ("ITPH') means situations with the potential to immediately and adversely affect or threaten public health or safety. At a minimum, "ITPH" includes ground surface or surface water discharges and sewage backup into a dwelling or other establishment. ISTS means an individual sewage treatment system as defined in Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. Minnesota Rules chapter 7080 means the state pollution control agency standards for the design, construction, installation and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems extracted from the current Minnesota Rules as adopted in this article. New system means any proposed ISTS, or any newly constructed ISTS which construction takes place after the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived until the time of final inspection and approval by the city. See Existing system. Noncompliant system means a prohibited ISTS; an ISTS located within a designated 100 -year flood plain; any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location, design, or construction standards of this Code and which is failing for any reason; and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. Owner means any person having legal or equitable title or sufficient proprietary interest in any building or land subject to the provisions of this article. For purposes of notification, the owner shall be the occupant of the property or the person listed as taxpayer on the current tax rolls. Pollutants means bacterial or chemical impurities, including pathogenic bacteria, infectious viruses, toxic chemicals, excess nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous), non -potable water, or septage. Privy means an outhouse, a cesspool enclosed by a building, typically not served with running water. Prohibited systems means cesspools, dry wells, leaching or seepage pits, and privies. Pumping means the removal by gravity, siphon or mechanical means of any liquid or septage from sewage or holding tanks. 51 Standard system means an ISTS employing a building sewer, sewage tanks, and the soil treatment system, consisting of trenches, at -grades, or mounds which are constructed on original soil which has a percolation rate equal to or faster than 120 minutes per inch and is constructed according to Minnesota Rules chapter 7080 and this Code. Structure means anything which is built, constructed or erected, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner, which requires a location on, below or above the ground. Treatment means the purification of raw sewage by the removal or neutralization of pollutants through separation, bacteriological processes, biological and physical filtration, and gasification. Sec. 58-42. - Statement of purpose. The city regulates the installation and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems to protect natural resources, protect public health and safety, and prevent the costly premature extension of municipal sewers. Sec. 58-43. - Adoption by reference. The Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, Parts 7080.0020-7080.0178, 7080.0400 and 7080.0600 relating to individual sewage treatment systems, are hereby adopted by reference. The Minnesota Rules chapter 7080, parts 7080.0179 (performance systems) and 7080.0450 (warrantied systems) are hereby prohibited from use within the city. Sec. 58-44. - Treatment required. All sewage generated within the city shall be disposed of by connection to the city sewer system or shall be treated and disposed of in an ISTS according to the provisions of this article. Sec. 58-45. -Jurisdiction; compliance. The provisions of this article shall apply to the method of sewage disposal from every building within the city intended for human use or habitation, whether such use is permanent, temporary or seasonal, regardless of the date of original construction or use. (1) The owners of all buildings where city sewer is available, or becomes available, shall connect the buildings to the city sewer subject to the following conditions: a. A code ISTS will not be required to be connected to the city sewer until the ISTS becomes noncompliant or the building undergoes major remodeling resulting in an increase in water use that exceeds the capacity of the ISTS. A compliant system will be required to connect to municipal sewer regardless of increase in water use. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until the building is connected to the city sewer. b. An ISTS that is noncompliant due only to a lack of a three-foot separation must connect to the city sewer system within the same time frame that ISTS replacement would be required. c. A failing ISTS "imminent threat to public health" that is discharging sewage to the surface must be connected to the city sewer within 90 days. (2) At the time connection to the city sewer is completed, all existing septic tanks no longer in use shall be pumped out and filled with native soil. (3) The owners of those buildings which have been completely connected to the city sewer shall be exempt from the maintenance and inspection provisions of this article. Sec. 58-46. - Permits. (a) A permit from the city is required for all construction, removal, alteration or repair of an ISTS within the city. A complete site evaluation and ISTS design must be approved by the city prior to the issuance of a permit. All permits must be issued to contractors who are licensed under Minnesota Rules 7080.0700-7080.0715, and all work must comply with this division. The city may reject permit applications that are incomplete or for repairs that do not meet the provisions of this division. The city may require additional inspections, removal or alteration of work performed which does not comply with the requirements of this division. The city reserves the right to deny additional permits to contractors who have failed to correct unsatisfactory work. The city maintains the right to pursue legal action or fines against anyone performing work on an ISTS without a permit. Construction relating to an ISTS that does not require a permit are as follows: (1) Repair or replacement of pumps, floats or other electrical devices of the pump. (2) Repair or replacement of baffles in the septic tank. (3) Installation or repair of inspection pipes and manhole covers. (4) Repair or replacement of the line from the building to the septic tank. (b) All permits issued for construction or repair of an ISTS shall meet the following standards: (1) A new ISTS shall be designed and constructed as a standard system in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and meet the provisions in subsection (b) of this section. (2) A new technology ISTS will only be allowed for use with an existing residence when a standard system is not feasible or the provisions of this article are not feasible due to preexisting lot limitations. . (3) When an existing ISTS is repaired or expanded, the system must be sized to treat the anticipated flow from the building, and the portions of the system that are repaired must become compliant or remain compliant according to this article. (4) Prior to any permits being issued for new construction, all ISTS sites must be completely enclosed in a durable four -foot blaze orange snow fence. The fence cannot be removed until permission is given from the on-site systems manager. Sec. S8-47. - Building permit applications. (a) New residence. No building permit shall be issued for any new building that will be connected to an ISTS until a site evaluation and design is approved by the on-site systems manager. The site evaluation must include the identification of both primary and alternate drainfield sites suitable for a minimum of a five -bedroom residence. If the building will be connected to an existing system, a site evaluation and design must be approved by the city, including the existing system specifications and a future site meeting the provisions of this article. A new residence must be connected to an ISTS meeting the definition of a code system. (b) Required upgrade or replacement. A sewage treatment system not meeting the requirements of Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, as amended, or the requirements of this article, whichever is more restrictive, must be upgraded, at a minimum, at any time a building permit is required for any improvements on, or use of, the property, subject to the following: (1) Any such system for which the city has previously issued orders requiring upgrade or replacement of the system by December 31, 2007, shall not be subject to this requirement until January 1, 2008. (2) Any such system for which the city has previously issued orders requiring upgrade or replacement of the system by December 31, 2010, shall not be subject to this requirement until January 1, 2011. (3) Regardless whether previous upgrade or replacement orders have been issued, this upgrade or replacement requirement shall not apply when said building permit is for regular maintenance or upkeep including but not limited to replacement of mechanical equipment such as air conditioning, furnaces, water heaters, or water softeners, or for re -roofing, re -siding or window replacement. IN (c) Construction of additional bedrooms or construction including water -using appliances that will increase the sewage flow into an ISTS. A building permit shall not be issued until the city confirms that the existing ISTS is compliant and of adequate size to treat the sewage flow from the building and that a future drainfield site is designed and preserved. If the existing ISTS must be repaired or replaced, an ISTS design for both the existing ISTS and a future drainfield site must be approved before issuing a building permit. If expansion or replacement of the ISTS is required, the ISTS must be installed and inspected before a certificate of occupancy shall be issued for the construction. Failure to identify satisfactory drainfield sites for the proposed sewage flow for use now as well as a future site shall result in the denial of the building permit application. (d) Expansion of an existing building, including decks and patios; construction of an accessory building, driveway or land alteration. A future drainfield site must be designed and preserved prior to the issuance of a building permit for any expansion of an existing building, construction to an accessory building or driveway or land alteration on a property using an ISTS. A building permit will not be issued when the proposed work would preclude the use of the only future drainfield site approved by the city. Sec. 58-48. - Conditional use permit and zoning variance applications. No conditional use permit or zoning variance application shall be approved for a property until the existing ISTS has been confirmed as being of adequate capacity for the anticipated use. If expansion or replacement of the ISTS is required, a site evaluation and design must be approved by the city prior to the approval of a conditional use permit or zoning variance. If the change in use intensifies the strength or quantity of flow for the ISTS, an alternate site must be designated and protected. Sec. 58-49. - Subdivision applications. No subdivision, lot division or replatting for the purpose of creating a new building site, which property includes the use of an ISTS, shall be approved by the city until a site evaluation report and ISTS design, when required, has been reviewed and approved, and all existing ISTS have been inspected and certified by the city as being in compliance with this article. (1) Each newly created lot, regardless of acreage and which is intended for the development of a residence, shall have approved primary and alternate drainfield sites. (2) Each new lot with an existing residence connected to an ISTS must have either two future drainfield sites or one future site and a code existing ISTS which is sized correctly for the existing residence or expandable to suit a five -bedroom residence (750 GPD), whichever is greater. (3) Each proposed lot shall be capable of sustaining a five -bedroom residence and two drainfield sites to serve the dwelling including those lots with existing residences. (4) As part of any subdivision, the owner shall grant to the city in a form approved by the city a perpetual right -of -entry to allow for the future inspection of all systems, which right -of -entry may be filed in the chain of title for the property. Sec. 58-50. - More restrictive design and construction standards. All ISTS permit applications, site evaluations, design specifications, construction methods, and material specifications shall meet the parts of Minnesota Rules chapter 7080 adopted by reference in section 58-43 with the following additional minimum standards: (1) Site evaluation. The site evaluation report shall include the following: a. Soil borings. At least three soil borings shall be completed for each new drainfield site designed. Each soil boring must be located within the drainfield site or within close proximity along similar contours such that similar soil conditions are likely. For additions to an ISTS, at least one soil boring shall be made in the expansion area. b. Percolation tests. At least two percolation tests shall be completed for each new drainfield site designed. Each percolation test must be located within the drainfield site or within close 7 proximity along similar contours such that similar soil conditions are likely. For additions to existing ISTS's, at least one percolation test shall be completed in the expansion area. c. Plot plan. A scale drawing of the entire lot showing the following: 1. All property lines and lot dimensions. 2. All existing and proposed structures. 3. All existing or proposed well locations, or water supply piping. 4. Relative elevations of house, lot corners and drainfield areas. 5. Slope of ground at drainfield sites by contour lines or direction arrows and slope percentages. 6. Location of all percolation test holes and soil borings with identifying symbols and relative ground elevations of each. 7. Primary and alternate drainfield areas identified. 8. Distance from primary and alternate drainfield areas to property lines, well locations, and any lake, stream, marsh or drainage channel within 75 feet of any part of the system. (2) ISTS design. ISTS design specifications shall include proposed flows or other sizing information, minimum sewage tank capacity, minimum soil treatment area requirements, a plan of the component layout, and all other information necessary to assure the city that the ISTS is designed and will be constructed to receive, treat and dispose of all of the sewage from the building served. Footing or roof drainage, water softener recharge water, garage floor drainage, toxic chemicals, flammable liquids, animal wastes, commercial process water and commercial kitchen grease shall not enter any portion of the ISTS but shall be separately treated and disposed of according to the applicable regulations of the MPCA, the state board of health and the city. a. Setbacks. The minimum setback distance requirements are as follows: Feature Water supply well: Deep well Shallow well Wetland Lake: General development Recreational development 8 Natural environment Tributaries, streams Driveways, sidewalks, decks and other hardcover Property lines, buildings and buried pipes Lawn sprinkler systems b. Sewage tanks. The minimum sewage tank size requirements are as follows: Number of Bedrooms Tank's Liquid Capacities (gallons) 4 or less 1 1,000 + 1,000 regardless of garbage disposal use 5 or 6 1 1,250 + 1,000 regardless of garbage disposal use 7, 8 or 9 1 1,500 + 1,500 regardless of garbage disposal use 10 or more Sewage tanks shall be sized as other establishments per Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. c. Pumping stations. In order to standardize installation and electrical connection methods, the following pumping station requirements must be met in addition to Minnesota Rules chapter 7080: 1. Electrical connection. A watertight, lockable electrical box must be mounted on a four -inch -by -four -inch treated redwood or cedar post. All electrical connections shall be made within the box. Pump connection must not be made using a direct line (plug-in only). Wire entry to the electrical box shall be sealed with a watertight material such as foam or putty. Alarm and pump floats shall be on separate electrical circuits. iv. Electrical wire from the power supply must not run over any tanks but must be laid beside the tanks and placed in conduit along the electrical post. v. Electrical cords from the pump and floats must be run through a two-inch PVC (or equivalent) conduit (schedule 80) with a one -inch gap between the conduit and the G] 150 150 75 75 10 10 10 20 10 10 b. Sewage tanks. The minimum sewage tank size requirements are as follows: Number of Bedrooms Tank's Liquid Capacities (gallons) 4 or less 1 1,000 + 1,000 regardless of garbage disposal use 5 or 6 1 1,250 + 1,000 regardless of garbage disposal use 7, 8 or 9 1 1,500 + 1,500 regardless of garbage disposal use 10 or more Sewage tanks shall be sized as other establishments per Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. c. Pumping stations. In order to standardize installation and electrical connection methods, the following pumping station requirements must be met in addition to Minnesota Rules chapter 7080: 1. Electrical connection. A watertight, lockable electrical box must be mounted on a four -inch -by -four -inch treated redwood or cedar post. All electrical connections shall be made within the box. Pump connection must not be made using a direct line (plug-in only). Wire entry to the electrical box shall be sealed with a watertight material such as foam or putty. Alarm and pump floats shall be on separate electrical circuits. iv. Electrical wire from the power supply must not run over any tanks but must be laid beside the tanks and placed in conduit along the electrical post. v. Electrical cords from the pump and floats must be run through a two-inch PVC (or equivalent) conduit (schedule 80) with a one -inch gap between the conduit and the G] electrical box. Electrical cords must not run through or under the manhole cover. Wires must not have ground contact. Pumping chamber. Pressure pipe exiting the pumping chamber must be laid on a uniform slope up to the soil treatment area for proper drain back. The pressure pipe must be sleeved inside a larger diameter pipe for additional support if spanning ground that has been excavated. If the pipe at the tank must be lower than union to get elevation for drain back, a one -quarter -inch weep hole must be used. When the soil depth above the pressure distribution pipe is less than 3'/2 feet, insulation must be added to achieve an insulating factor equal to 3'/2 feet of soil to decrease the potential for freezing (Styrofoam or concentric piping are acceptable methods). Piping under hardcover, such as tennis courts or driveways, shall be insulated pipe or equivalent. iii. A reserve capacity equaling 75 percent of the anticipated daily flow must be allowed in the pumping chamber between the alarm activation level and the pump tank inlet. d. Drainfields. Trenches. Trenches must meet Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. 2. Mounds and at -grades. Mounds and at -grades must meet specifications per Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. (3) Compliance standards. a. A new system shall be located, designed and constructed as a code system. b. When an existing code system is repaired or expanded, such ISTS shall remain a code system. Compliant systems, when repaired, shall be upgraded to a code system status whenever such classification is reasonably attainable. (4) Construction procedures. a. Protection of drainfield area. Proposed drainfield areas shall be identified and marked off on the lot at the time of the site evaluation and prior to any construction or grading occurring in the area. The drainfield area shall remain undisturbed until drainfield construction is commenced. No vehicular traffic shall be allowed in the drainfield area either before or after drainfield installation. b. Favorable weather required. Drainfield area or trench construction must not proceed if the area is wet or has had rain within 48 hours. Mound or trench construction shall not proceed unless the soil moisture content is below the plastic limit. c. Construction inspection required. The contractor issued a permit for ISTS construction shall perform all work according to the design specifications approved by the city for each particular ISTS. All subsurface work, including building sewer, sewage tanks, distribution system and soil treatment area shall be inspected by the city inspector prior to backfilling or covering of any portion thereof. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to notify the city at least 24 hours prior to the time an inspection will be required, and it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the inspection is accomplished and the construction is approved prior to any backfilling, covering or continuation of the construction. Sec. 58-51. - System operation, use and maintenance. (a) Generally. Existing systems require prudent use and proper maintenance to ensure that each system will continue to treat and dispose of the entire sewage input and operate in conformance with this article. Therefore, this section provides for certain maintenance standards and regular monitoring of all systems within the city. 10 (b) Owner's responsibility. It shall be the responsibility of each property owner to demonstrate that the ISTS on his property is in compliance with all requirements of this article, that the ISTS properly treats and/or disposes of the entire sewage input generated on the property, and that the ISTS is adequately and properly maintained at all times. The owner is also responsible for the protection of the alternate drainfield site, if designated due to the development of the property or was required to be designated for any other reason. Protection of the drainfield site includes, but is not limited to, preventing construction of buildings, excavating, filling, or driving across the drainfield site with automobile or heavy machinery traffic. (c) System use. All owners using or controlling the use of any ISTS shall use such ISTS in a prudent manner, shall control the volume of liquid discharged into the ISTS consistent with the design capacity; shall strictly limit the discharge of shredded garbage, residential kitchen grease or other solid matter into the system; and shall prohibit the discharge into the ISTS of footing or roof drainage, water softener recharge water, garage floor drainage, toxic chemicals, flammable liquids, animal wastes or commercial process water and commercial kitchen grease. (d) System maintenance. All owners using or controlling the use of any ISTS shall perform the following maintenance functions: (1) System location. A diagram shall be prepared and thereafter kept on the property showing location of the ISTS, including the sewage tanks, distribution boxes and soil treatment area, pump station, sewer line, water well and location of septic alarm in residence. (2) Annual inspection. It is the responsibility of the homeowner to monitor the condition of the ISTS serving the property on a regular basis and ensure that the ISTS is functioning properly. Whenever existing sewage tanks are not provided with inspection pipes, the owner of such tank shall install inspection pipes within 12 months of the effective date of the ordinance from which this article is derived. At the same time that the septic tank is opened for inspection, each distribution box shall be opened and any accumulated solids shall be placed in the septic tank for treatment. (3) Regular pumping. Sewage tanks and/or holding tanks shall be regularly pumped of septage as provided by this article. (4) Owner's records. Full and accurate records shall be kept on the property, which records shall list the date of every sewage tank or holding tank pumping, the contractor responsible for the pumping and the gallons removed, the date and nature of all ISTS repairs or alterations occurring after the effective date of the ordinance from which this article is derived, and shall include a copy of the most recent city inspection report (e) Sewage tank and holding tank pumping. It is unlawful for any person to pump or remove any septage (liquids or solids) from any sewage tank or holding tank without complying with the requirements of this article. (1) Required pumping. The owner of each sewage tank or holding tank shall cause such tank to be pumped for the removal of septage when required by one or more of the following provisions: a. Sludge buildup. Sewage tanks shall be pumped whenever measurement of the tank indicates that the top of the sludge layer in the tank or any compartment thereof is less than 12 inches below the bottom of the outlet device, or the floating solids layer is less than three inches from the bottom of the outlet device. b. Maintenance pumping. No sewage tank shall remain in service without being pumped at least once every three years, whether or not measurement indicates a sludge buildup. Each existing septic tank shall be pumped at least once within 36 months of the effective date of the ordinance from which this article is derived and thereafter at least once within 36 months of each succeeding pumping. In order to be considered a maintenance pumpout, the manhole or cover section (20 -inch diameter minimum) must be removed to allow the complete extraction of the solid materials within the sewage tank. The contractor must also determine whether the tanks are watertight and report this information on the pumpout notification. Failure to adhere to these requirements will result in the city's rejection of the pumpout notification as a bona fide maintenance pumpout. c. System failure. A noncompliant ISTS discharging pollutants shall have the sewage tanks regularly pumped to limit or eliminate effluent discharge until satisfactory repairs have been completed. d. Holding tanks. Holding tanks shall be pumped on a regular basis and in all cases shall be pumped before overflowing occurs. All new holding tank installations will require review by the onsite septic manager. Holding tanks shall be provided with a sight and sound alarm to warn of possible overflow. (2) Contractor required. All sewage and holding tank pumpings, shall be performed by licensed contractors. (3) Off-site disposal required. All septage removed from sewage tanks or holding tanks shall be removed from the site in sealed containers and shall be disposed of in a sanitary location and manner according to the requirements of the Metropolitan Council. (4) Registration required. Each pumping of every sewage tank and holding tank shall be registered with the city on forms provided for that purpose, within 30 days of the pumping. The contractor shall certify to the city the owners of the property, property address, date of pumping, gallons removed and location of sanitary disposal. Failure to register any pumping with the city may result in the city inspection report's classifying the ISTS as noncompliant. Sec. 58-52. - Special provisions for Lake Minnetonka Islands. All lots, properties, buildings and structures on Big Island, Mahpiyata Island and Deering Island, Lake Minnetonka, shall be provided with ISTS's which comply with the requirements of this article, as amended by the following special provisions and specific exceptions pertaining to island properties: (1) Systems not required. Vacant property or property used solely for one -family seasonal recreational use of land without structures, or with accessory structures only, as permitted in the RS zoning district, need not be provided with an ISTS, provided that, at any time such property is actually in use by one or more persons for overnight or longer stays, an approved marine toilet or portable holding tank toilet shall be available on the property or within a watercraft docked or moored at the property. (2) ISTS required. Each building or structure within the RS zoning district must be connected to an ISTS according to the provisions of this article as follows: a. For each principal dwelling. b. For each dwelling on a property containing two or more dwellings pursuant to a private guest cabin conditional use permit. c. For each seasonal dwelling over 800 square feet in floor area. d. For any dwelling or building which has water plumbed inside and has a sink, toilet, tub or other plumbing fixture. e. Island septic systems are exempt from the five bedroom minimum sizing standards for new construction and may be sized for actual water use. (3) Alternative ISTS permitted. Outhouses, incinerating devices, composting devices or small portable holding tank toilets are permitted as follows: a. Seasonal dwellings of less than 800 square feet in floor area. b. Seasonal recreational use of land without structures, or with accessory structures only. c. Any other permitted or conditional use only upon approval of a variance issued by the council. 12 d. Outhouses shall be constructed in accordance with Minnesota Rules chapter 7080, except that sealed vault type outhouses shall not be permitted. e. Existing outhouses not conforming to any or all of the above requirements shall be abandoned, filled in and the superstructure removed within ten months of notification that a noncompliant system exists. DIVISION 2. - ADMINISTRATIONS Sec. 58-71. - Administrating officer. The provisions of this article shall be administered by the building and zoning department and the onsite systems manager, who shall coordinate all permit applications and inspection services. The on-site systems manager or building official shall review and evaluate technical matters including ISTS design and installation as provided in this division. Sec. 58-72. - Enforcement; violation. (a) Enforcement. It shall be the duty of the onsite systems manager to enforce the provisions of this article and to bring to the attention of the prosecuting attorney any violations or lack of compliance with this article. (b) Civil enforcement. Appropriate actions and proceedings may be taken by law or in equity to prevent any violation of the provisions of this article to prevent unlawful construction, to recover damages, to restrain, correct or abate a violation, to prevent illegal occupancy of a building, or to prevent continued use of a noncompliant ISTS. (c) Criminal enforcement. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or a fine or both as defined by law. In the event of a violation of this chapter, in addition to the other remedies, the city may institute appropriate actions or proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations. Sec. 58-73. -Variances. The on-site systems manager may grant variances to the provisions of this article due to unnecessary or unintended hardship to the owner that are not contrary to the intent and purpose of this article or other applicable law. Variance applications shall be reviewed by the on-site systems manager upon written request of the owner or the owner's agent. (1) Variance applications must include complete soil testing and ISTS design in accordance with this article, including the identification of any site limitations leading to the variance request. (2) Variances shall be approved, conditionally approved or rejected in writing by city staff. The owner shall pay all costs incurred by the city in the review of the proposal. (3) Variance approvals shall be subject to all conditions established by the city at the time of approval and thereafter. (4) Any variance application may be referred to the city council for review by the on-site systems manager. Sec. 58-74. - Inspection program. For purposes of ensuring continued proper use and maintenance of all existing ISTS's, the city shall periodically inspect each existing ISTS. (1) Right of entry. The city inspector shall have the right of entry onto every property in the city, which property includes an ISTS, for purposes of inspecting such ISTS for compliance with the 13 provisions of this article. Each construction permit issued after adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived shall be construed as the right of entry to the city inspector by explicit approval of the owner requesting such permit, which approval may be filed in the chain of title for the property. Failure of any party to grant the city access for this purpose shall be grounds to classify any ISTS on the property as noncompliant. The city attorney shall thereafter take such action as is necessary to enable the city to perform the inspection and to enforce all the provisions of this article, and to assess the cost thereof against the property. (2) Inspection report. Within a reasonable period, after the inspection of each ISTS by the city, the city shall provide the results of such inspection in writing to the owner of the ISTS, including the classification of the ISTS as to compliance with city requirements. Notice of a noncompliant or failing ISTS shall include orders for maintenance, repairs or replacement, the procedures for obtaining all required permits, the deadline for completion of the construction or pumping, and the penalties for failure to comply with the order. (3) Inspection schedule. Code and compliant ISTS's shall be inspected by the city on a routine basis or as necessary. Sec. 58-75. - Noncompliant systems. (a) Owners of noncompliant septic systems determined as such by the City of Orono's earlier inspection programs which were issued orders requiring maintenance, repair or replacement shall be subject to the following: (1) An ISTS located within the Shoreland District found to be noncompliant due solely to lack of three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics shall be repaired or replaced within a reasonable period of time not to extend past December 31, 2007. (2) An ISTS located outside the Shoreland District found to be noncompliant due solely to lack of three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics shall be repaired or replaced within a reasonable period of time not to extend past December 31, 2010. (b) Owners of noncompliant septic systems identified as such after the date of this ordinance which are found to be non-compliant for other reasons than due solely to lack of three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics shall be issued orders requiring maintenance, repair or replacement, as follows: (1) An ISTS found to be noncompliant because it is either failing or prohibited, as defined in section 58-43, shall be repaired or replaced within 90 days, if feasible, but in no case later than ten months after the date of the repair order. (2) Sewage tanks requiring pumping in order to eliminate surface discharge shall be pumped within 48 hours and as often as necessary thereafter to eliminate effluent discharge until system repairs are completed. (c) An ISTS required to obtain and maintain a MPCA state disposal system permit shall meet the requirements of Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. If the state permit lapses, orders shall be issued to cease use of the ISTS within ten days, such use to be discontinued until reinstatement of the state permit. (d) Failure to obey a lawful order requiring repair, alteration or replacement of a noncompliant ISTS shall be cause for the city to enjoin the owner or occupant from further use of the ISTS. Upon notice, the owner shall have ten days to show cause to the city why the property should not be condemned for occupancy according to Minn. Stat. § 463.15 et seq. (Sec. 58-76. - Annual service charge. 14 (a) An annual service charge in the amount prescribed by resolution of the council shall be paid by the owner of every building connected to an ISTS, such charge being for purposes of administering and enforcing the city inspection program as provided for in this article. A separate charge shall be due for each separate ISTS located on each property. (b) The service charge shall be due 45 days after the billing date. (c) It shall be the duty of the city administrator to endeavor to collect all delinquent accounts. (d) Each year the city administrator shall prepare an assessment roll providing for the assessment of the delinquent accounts against the respective properties as provided in Minn. Stat. § 429.061, subd. 3, and shall certify the roll to the county auditor, who shall thereupon enter such amount with the tax levy on such property collectible with the taxes for the next year. Sec. 58-77. - Property transaction standards for individual sewage treatment systems. (a) No owner of a tract of land upon which a dwelling is located, or a tract of land upon which a structure which is required to have an individual sewage treatment system is located, shall sell or transfer to another party said tract of land, unless the following requirements are met: (1) The seller of any property having an individual sewage treatment system shall have a state licensed inspector or designer I complete the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) sewage system compliance inspection form for existing sewage systems in accordance with this article and Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. The exception would be a new septic system installed within the previous five years or a compliance inspection performed by a licensed inspector or designer I within the previous three years. (2) The seller must provide a copy of the completed sewage system disclosure form and the certificate of compliance or notice of non-compliance to any person who signs a purchase agreement. The disclosure form and certificate of compliance or notice of non-compliance inspection form must be provided to the buyer prior to signing the purchase agreement. (3) The licensed inspector or designer I must submit a copy of the certificate of compliance or notice of non-compliance to the city within 30 days of the date of inspection. (4) If the existing system is found to be out of compliance it must be brought into compliance prior to transfer of the property. If the system is not brought into compliance prior to transfer, the seller shall provide the buyer sufficient security in the form of an escrow agreement to assure the installation of a complying ISTS. (5) If the seller fails to provide a certificate of compliance, the seller shall provide the buyer sufficient security in the form of an escrow agreement to assure the installation of a complying ISTS. (6) The security shall be placed in an escrow with a licensed real estate closer, licensed attorney- at-law or a federal or state chartered financial institution. The amount escrowed shall be equal to 150 percent of a written estimate to install a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certified installer, or the amount shall be equal to 110 percent of the written contract price for the installation of a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certified installer. After a complying ISTS has been installed and a certificate of compliance issued, the City of Orono shall provide the escrow agent a copy of the certificate of compliance. Secs. 58-78-58-115. - Reserved. 15 Appendix E Sec. 14-189. - Prohibited discharges of groundwater/stormwater into the sanitary sewerage system. (a) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, any stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage or cooling water to any sanitary sewer. Any person having a roof drain, sump pump, unauthorized swimming pool discharge, cistern overflow pipe or surface drain connected and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer shall disconnect and remove any piping or system conveying such water to the sanitary sewerage system. (b) Every person owning improved real estate that discharges into the city's sanitary sewerage system shall allow inspection by authorized city employees or its agents of all properties or structures connected to the sanitary sewerage system to confirm there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewerage system. In lieu of authorizing a city inspection of the property, the property owner may furnish a certificate from a licensed plumber, in a form acceptable by the city, certifying that the property has no prohibited discharge in the municipal sanitary sewer system. (c) Any owner of any property found to be in violation of this section shall make the necessary changes to comply with this division, and such change shall be verified by authorized city employees or agents. Any property or structure not inspected or not in compliance shall, following notification from the city, comply within 14 calendar days or be subject to the surcharge as provided in subsection (f) of this section. (d) Existing buildings with sump pumps and all newly constructed buildings with sumps shall have a discharge pipe installed to the outside wall of the building. The pipe attachment must be of rigid permanent -type plumbing, such as PVC, copper or galvanized pipe. The discharge shall extend outside of the foundation and may not be pumped directly onto any public right-of-way unless approved by the public service director or his designee. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer shall be closed and repaired in compliance with applicable codes. (e) Upon verified compliance with this chapter, the city reserves the right to reinspect such property or structure or require the property owner to provide a certificate of compliance from a licensed plumber in a form acceptable to the city at least annually to confirm continued compliance. Any property found not to be in compliance upon reinspection by the city shall, following notification from the city, comply within 14 calendar days or be subject to the surcharge provided for in subsection (f) of this section. (f) A surcharge set by the annual fee schedule adopted by the city council is imposed and shall be added to every utility billing to properties not in compliance with this chapter. The surcharge shall be added to every quarterly utility billing until the property is in compliance as determined by the city. If the surcharge is not paid in a timely manner, the delinquent payments may be certified for collection with the following years' property taxes. (g) The city council, upon recommendation of the city administrator and the city engineer, shall hear and decide requests for temporary waivers from the provisions of this division where strict enforcement would cause a threat to public safety because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Any request for a temporary waiver shall be submitted to the city administrator in writing within 14 calendar days of notification of noncompliance. Upon approval of a temporary waiver from the provisions of this division, the property owner shall agree to pay an additional fee for sanitary sewerage services based on the number of gallons discharged into the sanitary sewerage system as estimated by the city engineer. (h) Stormwater and all other unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such drainage facilities as are specifically designated by the city engineer. (i) The imposition of the surcharge shall not limit the right of the city to seek an injunction in district court ordering the person to disconnect the nonconforming connection to the sanitary sewer or from pursuing any other legal remedies available; or in the alternative, the city may correct the violation and certify the costs of correction as an assessment against the property on which the correction was made. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4C WATER SUPPLY Introduction 4C-2 Existing Facilities 4C-2 Table 4C-1 Well Construction Summary 4C-2 Table 4C-2 Existing Storage Facilities 4C-3 Table 4C-3 Met Council Projections 4C-4 Table 4C-4 Historic Water Use 4C-5 Table 4C-5 Projected Water Demand - Navarre 4C-6 Table 4C-6 Projected Water Demand — Highway 12 4C-6 Water System Evaluation 4C-8 Table 4C-7 Projected Water Supply - Navarre 4C-8 Table 4C-8 Projected Water Supply — Highway 12 4C-8 Table 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre 4C-10 Table 4C-10 Required Storage — Highway 12 4C-10 Table 4C-11 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-11 Table 4C-12 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-12 Table 4C-13 Recommended Fire Flows 4C-14 Proposed Water System Improvements 4C-16 WaterSystem Emergency Preparedness 4C-17 Table 4C-14 Additional Water Resources 4C-19 Conservation Plan 4C-23 Goals and Policies 4C-26 Table 4C-15 Future Expansion Projects 4C-28 Table 4C-16 Future Sewer Maintenance Needed 4C-29 Appendix 1. Figures / Maps Appendix 2. MnDNR Local Water Supply Template Submission City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 1 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to update its water supply plan and submit to the DNR and the Metropolitan Council as part of the Comprehensive Plan update required of all metro area cities. This Chapter is intended to address that requirement. EXISTING FACILITIES General This Section provides a summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution facilities for the City of Orono. The City has four existing water systems: the Navarre Water System, the Highway 12 Water System, the Wayzata System Extension, and the Long Lake System Extension. The Navarre Water System is located in the southern portion of Orono. It consists of two municipal wells, a treatment facility, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Highway 12 Water System is located in the northern portion of the City. It consists of two municipal wells, a small treatment facility including a chemical feed system, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Wayzata System Extension is located in the northeast portion of Orono. It consists of a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Wayzata. The Long Lake System Extension is a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Long Lake. More than 50 percent of the households in Orono receive their potable water from private individual wells. The distribution systems are comprised of watermains ranging in size from 6 to 16 inches in diameter. The existing water service area is shown in Table 4C-1. Water Supply The City's water is currently provided by four existing water systems. The Navarre Water System is supplied by two wells, Well 1 and 2. The Highway 12 Water System is supplied by two wells, Wells 3 and 4. A summary of the specific well construction information is provided in Table 4C-1. Table 4C-1 Well Construction summary Navarre Navarre Well 1 Well 2 Highway 12 3 ell Highway 12 Well 4 Unique Well No. 205627 211965 509097 821940 Year Constructed 1971 1971 1991 2017 Well Pump Capacity (gpm) 1,000 500 500 1,000 Casing Diameter (inches) 12 8 16 18 Casing Depth (feet) NA NA NA 365 Overall Well Depth (feet) 385 390 381 1 500 Total Well Capacity 1.8 MGD 1.6 MGD Firm Capacity 0.6 MGD 0.6 MGD City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 2 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply The total well capacity is determined as the total capacity of all wells operating for 20 hours per day. It is considered good practice to allow the well pumps a few hours of down time to "rest", which ultimately extends the life of the pumps and allows for aquifer recharge. The firm capacity is the total capacity with the single largest pump out of service and is determined for a pumping period of 20 hours per day. Regulatory agencies recommend the firm capacity be equal to or greater than the average day demand it serves. Water Treatment Treatment of source water for the Navarre Water System consists of sand filtration for iron and manganese removal, ion exchange softening to reduce hardness, and chemical addition prior to entry into the distribution system. Fluoride is added for dental cavity protection, chlorine is added for disinfection, and polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Treatment of source water for the Highway 12 system consists of chemical addition of chlorine and fluoride, and polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Water Storage The existing storage facilities in the City of Orono consist of one 200,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Navarre Water System and one 400,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Highway 12 Water System. Details of the water storage tower are presented in Table 4C-2. Table 4C-2: Existing Storage Facilities 11 Navarre Highway 12 Water Water Tower Tower Capacity (gallons) 200,000 400,000 Year Constructed 1971 1993 High Water Level 1,102 1,165 Support Type Multi- legged Hydropillar Water Distribution System The Orono water system is comprised of water mains ranging in size from 6 inches to 16 inches in diameter. As previously discussed, both the Navarre and Highway 12 service areas include groundwater wells and elevated storage. The Wayzata System Extension and Long Lake System Extension are supplied with water directly from the other two Cities' water systems and only provide a means of distribution to the customers. The existing capacities of the systems appear to be adequate in regards to pressure and available fire flow. Future improvements to provide service to planned expansion areas as well as increased supply capacities are discussed later in this report. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 3 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Mains that are 10 inches and larger are considered trunk mains for this size of distribution system. When possible, all mains should be built in loops. A dead end main without enough connected demand will require frequent flushing to reduce water stagnation problems. This problem is especially true for trunk mains because of the larger volume of water stored. The existing system has several dead end pipe segments in cul-de-sacs and other areas that limit looping. Looping of water mains also helps provide for uninterrupted service to most of the system customers when one pipe segment is shut down for repairs. With a looped system only an isolated section of the system will be out of service instead of an entire neighborhood or commercial area. Looping also provides for substantial flow increases during a fire demand as the demand at the location of the fire can be met from more than one direction in the system. The existing water distribution system is shown in Table 4C- 2. LAND USE AND POPULATION Land Use The water system planning area is based on providing service within the current City limits. Population Projection The Metropolitan Council's "Thrive" forecasts are presented in Table 4C-3. The Metropolitan Council projects the City of Orono's population to approach 9,800 in 2030. Table 4C-3: Met Council Pro'ections 2010 2020 2030 2040 POPULATION 7,437 8,100 8,800 9,500 HOUSEHOLDS 2,826 3,200 3,560 3,900 EMPLOYMENT 1,562 1,700 1,780 1,800 As previously noted, approximately one-half of the existing population is served by private wells. A portion of the projected population growth will be served by the Orono water system. This increase in population served is likely the growth that will occur within and adjacent to the Highway 12 water system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 4 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply WATER USAGE Existing Water Usage Historical water data is an important tool for determining trends and helping to assist the City in determining if there are problems within the system. Yearly and monthly pumping summaries from 2005 to 2015 are presented below in Table 4C-1 for the Water System. The yearly pumping totals reveal a slight decrease in recent water usage. Table 4C-4: Historic Water Demand Average Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2010-2015 Pop. Served 2260 2305 2350 2380 2410 2440 2470 2500 2970 2970 2970 2720 Total Connections 879 882 876 905 945 965 997 1006 1001 1002 1008 997 Res. Water Delivered (MG) 62.44 78.56 69.3 72.6 72.11 69.94 72.53 78.67 75.07 67.1 65.27 71.43 C/I/I Water Delivered (MG) 22.69 21.28 18.34 8.58 26.07 21.46 26.55 32.27 17.93 16.7 16.87 21.96 Other Water Delivered (MG) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.38 3.36 3.86 1.57 2.2 Wholesale Deliveries (MG) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.61 0.6 0.67 0.31 Total Water Delivered (MG) 85.13 99.84 87.64 81.18 98.18 91.4 99.08 115.32 96.97 88.26 84.38 95.9 Total Water Pumped (MG) 99.78 123.64 131.61 112.51 129.28 107.83 116.32 125.01 108.49 96.07 374.15 154.65 Water Supplier Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.71 2.85 275 47.26 Percent unmetered/ unaccounted 14.68% 19.25% 33.41% 27.85% 24.06% 15.24% 14.82% 7.75% 5.35% 5.16% 3.95% 8.71% Average Daily Demand (MGD) 0.27 0.34 0.36 0.31 0.35 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.3 0.26 1.03 0.42 Max Daily Demand (MGD) 1.11 1.08 1.16 1.43 0.91 0.79 0.77 0.89 0.74 0.8 10.33 2.39 Date of Max Demand 7/10/2012 8/26/2013 8/27/2014 4/21/2015 Res. Per Capita Demand (GPCD) 75.7 93.4 80.8 83.6 82 78.5 80.4 86.2 69.2 61.9 60.2 72.8 Total per Capita Demand (GPCD) 121 1 147 153.4 1 129.5 147 121.1 1 129 137 1 100.1 88.6 345.1 153.5 MG - Million Gallons MGD - Million Gallons per Day GPCD - Gallons per Capita per Day Unaccounted for water was above 10 percent in 2008 and 2009. Since then, the unaccounted for water has been very good at below 10 percent. Determining unaccounted- for naccountedfor water is an important tool. The City monitors this parameter on a quarterly basis as well as conducting water audits and annual leak detection. Reducing the amount of City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 5 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply unaccounted for water will conserve the amount of water pumped as well as preserve the life expectancy of the well pumps. Water Demand Proiections Water demand projections have been estimated with respect to the construction of new homes. For simplicity reasons, new industrial/commercial demands have been calculated by the available acreage for development. The population projections shown below indicate what the various water demands would be should the population increase to that value. The populations shown is only for planning purposes and it should not be presumed that this growth will occur. The proposed expansion areas of the distribution system are shown in Figure 4.1. From historical data previously presented, the average per capita daily water usage for the Navarre Water System has been selected as 100 gpcpd with a peaking factor of 2.0. The total average demand per capita for the Highway 12 Water System has been selected as 150 gpcpd with a peaking factor of 2.0. Since the population in the Highway 12 system is so small the commercial water use skews population based projections therefore a 0.10 mgpd constant has been added. The selected water use values were then used with population projections to project future water demands which are presented in Table 4C-5 and Table 4C-6. Table 4C-5: Projected Water Demand - Navarre Service Area Population Average Daily Demand (MGD)1 Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)2 2200 0.233 0.466 2,300 0.23 0.46 2,400 0.24 0.48 2,500 0.25 0.5 2,600 0.26 0.52 2,700 0.27 0.54 2,800 0.28 0.56 2,900 0.29 0.58 3,000 0.3 0.6 Used an average day usage of 100 gpcpd 2 Used a peaking factor of 2.0 TABLE 4C-6: Projected Water Demand - Highway 12 Service Area Population Average Daily Demand (MGD)' Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)2 400 0.16 0.32 600 0.19 0.38 800 0.22 0.44 1,000 0.25 0.5 1,200 0.28 0.56 1,400 0.31 0.62 1,600 0.34 0.68 1,800 0.37 0.74 2,000 0.40 0.80 Used an average day usage of 150 gpcpd, and 100K GPD of comcercial use " Use a peaking factor of 2.0 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 6 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply WATER SYSTEM E " L UA TION General This section provides an evaluation summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution systems for the City of Orono. The existing system consists of four water supply systems. These four systems consist of four supply wells, two elevated storage tanks, two water treatment facilities, and four distribution systems. The existing water infrastructure components have been evaluated in terms of current and future demands. Water Supply Wells General The City of Orono currently obtains water from four wells, Navarre Well 1 and 2 and Highway 12 Well 3 and 4. All four of the wells draw from the Jordan aquifer. Supply well details are presented in Table 4C-1. Well Capacity The Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten State Standards) recommends that the average day demand be met by the firm capacity. Firm capacity is the pumping capacity with the largest well out of service. In addition, the daily well output is calculated based on operating for 20 hours per day to allow 4 hours per day of aquifer recharge. Using these standards, the Navarre Water System has a total capacity of 1.80 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.60 MGD. The Highway 12 Water System has a total capacity of 1.60 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. Table 4C-7 and Table 4C-8 present the number of wells that will be needed to meet future demand projections for the Navarre and Highway 12 systems. The projected demands, both average and peak day usage, are listed in Table 4C-7 and Table 4C- 8. As shown in Table 4C-7, no additional wells are required for either system as both have adequate well capacity to meet future demands. . City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 7 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Table 4C-7: Projected Water Supply - Navarr Service Area Population Average Day Demand (MGD) Maximum Day Demand (MGD) No. of New Wells Required Firm Capacity (MGD) Total Capacity (MGD) 2,200 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.8 2,300 0.23 0.46 0 0.6 1.8 2,400 0.24 0.48 0 0.6 1.8 2,500 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.8 2,600 0.26 0.52 0 0.6 1.8 2,700 0.27 0.54 0 0.6 1.8 2,800 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.8 2,900 0.29 0.58 0 0.6 1.8 3,000 0.30 0.60 0 0.6 1.8 TABLE 4C-8 Projected Water Su ply - Highway 12 Service Area Population Average Day Demand (MGD) Maximum Day Demand (MGD) No. of New Wells Required Firm Capacity (MGD) Total Capacity (MGD) 400 0.16 0.32 0 0.6 1.6 600 0.19 0.38 0 0.6 1.6 800 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.6 1,000 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.6 1,200 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.6 1,400 0.31 0.62 0 0.6 1.6 1,600 0.34 0.68 0 0.6 1.6 1,800 0.37 0.74 0 0.6 1.6 2,000 0.40 0.80 0 0.6 1.6 Well Head Protection Well head protection should be given consideration when evaluating new well locations. Wellhead protection is a method of preventing contamination of public water supplies by managing potential contaminant sources in the area that contribute to a public water supply well. Land uses relative to commercial, industrial, and underground storage of chemicals and petroleum are considered higher risks to ground water protection than permanent open spaces, parks, farmland and low-density residential lots. All public water suppliers are required City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 8 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply to implement wellhead protection measures. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) was granted authority to implement wellhead protection and rules governing wellhead protection were adopted in March 2007. Grouping of wells eases wellhead protection and potential treatment beyond the existing facilities. Water Treatment The Navarre Water System currently uses sand filtration for iron and manganese removal, ion exchange softening to reduce hardness, and adds fluoride, chlorine, and polyphosphate to the water before entry into the distribution system. At this time, the City does not need to pursue additional water treatment capacity at the Navarre WTP. However, the City should make chemical feed and other improvements at the Navarre WTP as outlined in Section 6. The Highway 12 Water System adds chlorine and fluoride, as well as polyphosphate to inhibit corrosion to water before entry into the distribution system. Water Storage The City of Orono's existing storage facilities consist of a 200,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Navarre system and a 400,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Highway 12 system. Details of the storage tanks are presented in Table 4C-2. The principal purpose of storage is to provide the ability to equalize pumping rates during periods of variable rate demand. Adequate storage permits a reduction in the size of the pumps required to supply a community because peak demands are diminished by the reserve provided in storage. Storage is typically provided in elevated tanks for communities the size of Orono to provide storage and a pressure source even when the wells are not pumping. The primary reasons for providing storage are as follows: ■ To equalize pressure in the distribution system. ■ For emergency requirements (pump failure, power failure). ■ Fire protection. Storage adequacy can be assessed using the Average Day Criteria or the Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria. Average Day Criteria Generally, the minimum recommended standard, without fire protection, is equal to the average day demand (Ten State Standards, 1997). By this standard, the Navarre Water System currently has a slight storage deficit since the average day demand is 220,000 gpd and the current storage capacity is 20,000 gallons. As shown in Table 4C-9, the Navarre Water System will have a storage deficit of 100,000 gallons when the population using the system reaches 3,000. As shown in Table 4C-10, the Highway 12 Water System will have adequate storage until the population exceeds 2000 and the average day demand rises above 400,000 gpd. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 9 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) Existing Storage (gallons) Storage Deficit 2200 220,000 200,000 20,000 2,300 230,000 200,000 30,000 2,400 240,000 200,000 40,000 2,500 250,000 200,000 50,000 2,600 260,000 200,000 60,000 2,700 270,000 200,000 70,000 2,800 280,000 200,000 80,000 2,900 290,000 200,000 90,000 3,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 TABLE 4C-10: Required Storage - Highway 12 Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) ExistingStorage Storage (gallons) Deficit 400 160,000 400,000 None 600 190,000 400,000 None 800 220,000 400,000 None 1,000 250,000 400,000 None 1,200 280,000 400,000 None 1,400 310,000 400,000 None 1,600 340,000 400,000 None 1,800 370,000 400,000 None 2,000 400,000 400,000 None Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria Another approach is to consider the individual storage components for equalization, fire demand, and emergency reserve versus the available water supply production facilities. The water production and storage must be considered together, since an increase in production may decrease the amount of water storage required. Water storage requirements using this approach for the Navarre Water System and the Highway 12 Water System are summarized in Table 4C-9 and Table 4C-10. The current storage is not able to meet the maximum day, fire protection and emergency storage criteria for either water system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 10 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE 4C-11: Required Storage based on High Day -Navarre Population 2'200 2,400 2,600 2,800 (Existing) 3,000 Fire Demand (gpm)' 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 421 459 498 536 574 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,421 2,459 2,498 2,536 2,574 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 500 500 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,921 1,959 1,998 2,036 2,074 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,780 352,620 359,640 366,480 373,320 Emergency Storage (gallons)3 121,248 132,192 143,424 154,368 165,312 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,028 484,812 503,064 520,848 538,632 Current Available Storage (gallons) 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -267,028 -284,812 -303,064 -320,848 -338,632 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi -family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 5.1. (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 11 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE 4C-12: Required Storage based on High Day - Highway 12 800 Population 400(Existing) 1,200 1,600 Fire Demand (gpm)l 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 422 844 1,266 1,689 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,422 2,844 3,266 3,689 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 1,000 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,922 2,344 2,766 2,689 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,960 421,920 497,880 484,020 Emergency Storage (gallons)' 121,536 243,072 364,608 486,432 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,496 664,992 862,488 970,452 Current Available Storage (gallons) 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -67,496 -264,992 -462,488 -570,452 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi -family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 4C-8 (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. Water Distribution System General The analysis of a water distribution system often requires the use of a computer model of the system. A computer model is prepared which is calibrated with field data resulting in a model that simulates the known conditions of the system as closely as possible. This model provides a basis for simulation of existing system operations and deficiencies as well as future operating conditions of the system. From these simulations, determinations can be made as to the improvements that the system will need. The water distribution system for the City of Orono was modeled using Bentley's WaterCad version 8.0. The computer network is used to analyze steady state flows for pipe distribution systems. The information required by the model includes data such as diameter, length, and Hazen -Williams C Factor (pipe roughness factor) for each pipe in the system. Other data required include ground elevation of pipe junctions, elevated storage water level, and water demand on the system. Primary goals of the analysis included the following: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 12 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Analysis of pressures throughout the water system. Analysis of available fire flows throughout the system. Analysis of interconnections between Long Lake and Orono for the Highway 12 system. Analysis of Existing Water System Existing Water Pressure. Average Day (AD) pressures in the existing system range from 50 to 78 psi. These pressures are within acceptable standards. According to Ten States Standards for Water Works (2012), an industry standard that the Minnesota Department of Health has adopted, pressures in the system should meet the following: "The minimum working pressure in the distribution system should be 35 psi (240 kPa) and the normal working pressure should be approximately 60 to 80 psi (410 - 550 kPa). When static pressures exceed 100 psi (690 kPa), pressure reducing devices shall be provided on mains or as part of the meter setting on individual service lines in the distribution system." Peak Hour (PH) pressures, which represent some of the highest non -emergency demands that a system will require, range from 44 to 73 psi, which is again within acceptable standards. Therefore, no deficiencies were identified during computer system analysis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 13 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Existing Available Fire Flow The modeled fire flows were run up to a maximum of 5,000 gpm. The minimum fire flow available at any given point in a system should not be less than 500 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi. This represents the amount of water required to provide for two standard hose streams on a fire in a typical residential area for residential dwellings with spacing of 100 feet. The distance between buildings and the corresponding fire flow is summarized in Table 4C-13 TABLE 4C-13: Recommended Fire Flows Distance Between Buildings Required Fire Flow (feet) (gpm) More Than 100 500 31-100 750 30-11 1,000 Less Than 11 1,500 The computed fire flows for the current distribution system are represented in Figure 4C-8. They are represented by fire flow districts in gallons per minute. Generally, available fire flows are adequate throughout the water distribution system. Areas with less than 500 gpm mostly include residential properties with limited water main looping due to locations along cul-de-sacs or dead end roads. The majority of these locations are in the Navarre system and the Wayzata System Extension. Pipe Velocities and Friction Losses Pipe segments are considered potentially deficient, or most -limiting, if they have the following conditions: ■ Velocities greater than 5 ft/s; and ■ Head losses greater than 10 ft/1000 ft. Velocities in pipe segments are acceptable up to about 10 ft/s during emergency or extreme demand conditions of short duration. As velocities increase, pipe friction increases and problems with water hammer occur. This is especially true in systems with higher pressures. The system has been checked for locations where velocities and head losses meet the above stated conditions. There are several locations where pipe velocities exceed 5 ft/s during emergency or peak demand flows. During normal operating conditions, no segments with high velocities or high head loss were observed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 14 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Long Lake Interconnections During emergency events, the Orono Highway 12 system and the Long Lake system are able to provide water service to each other through a series of interconnections. In the past, this arrangement is able to work for extended periods of time due to the large extra capacity of Long Lake wells, along with the large elevated storage in the City of Orono. In the event of emergency water supply needs, where one of the system wells are to be off-line for an extended period, the combined firm supply capacity is able to meet the maximum day demands of the combined systems by nearly 500,000 gallons. In addition, the combined water system can meet domestic demands for its customer base during the event that either tower is taken off line for repairs or rehabilitation. During these outages, available fire flows will be reduced significantly compared to when each tower is in operation. In the event of the Orono tank being taken off line, available fire flows will be reduced to approximately 700-750 gpm throughout the northwest area of the Highway 12 system. While adequate for residential fire flows, the fire department should be aware that tankers may be needed on-call if a larger fire occurs at a large industrial or institutional customer. There are currently four interconnections between the Long Lake and Orono (Highway 12) water systems. Two of the interconnections have automatic pressure reducing valves (PRVs) which allow emergency flow in either direction if an emergency occurs and system pressure drops below a minimum pressure setting. The interconnections are located near the following intersections: ■ Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard (Automatic PRV) • Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard • Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard(Automatic PRV) • Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard The PRVs rarely operate, especially since the set points for operation are at low levels which are not impacted by normal operating conditions. The primary operation of these interconnections would be during an emergency such as a large fire when additional water would be required for the duration of the fire. In the event that one system loses supply capacity or a tower is taken out of service, these interconnections can also be utilized. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 15 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS General The major water system components have been evaluated in the previous sections. A detailed description of the proposed improvements is presented in this section. Water Supply The Navarre Water System currently has two wells with a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. During the last four years, the maximum daily demand has averaged less than 0.5 MGD, which means the current water system has excess capacity. The service area of the Navarre Water System is close to full development so the population growth within the service area is expected to be minimal. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. The Highway 12 Water System was recently upgraded from one well which ran nearly 24 hours per day during the summer, to two wells. The firm capacity is 0.6 MGD. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. Treatment Facilities The objective of a water system is to provide quality water that is fit for domestic and commercial use. The City currently does not have any major water quality issues that need to be addressed, or major outstanding issues with both the Navarre WTP and the Highway 12 Well House Water Storage As discussed previously, the Navarre Water System has a current storage deficit of 20,000 gallons using the average day criteria and a storage deficit of 267,000 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The existing storage capacity is very close to meeting the current average demand and very little growth is expected in the Navarre Distribution System. Therefore, it is concluded that storage capacity is not needed at this time. If the City sees an increase in water demand for the Navarre System we may want to consider additional storage that would also meet the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The Highway 12 Water System currently meets the average day criteria and has a storage deficit of 67,500 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. Given that the existing storage meets the average day criteria and nearly meets the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria, additional storage is not needed at this time. As water demands increase the City will need to consider added storage for the Highway 12 Water System. Distribution System Proposed water distribution system improvements are shown in Figure 4C-15. Improvements include water main extensions to serve expansion areas along the west edge City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 16 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply of the Highway 12 system. In addition, a portion of the existing Highway 12 system is recommended to be increased in size from an 8 inch main to a 12 inch. This improved trunk main will increase available fire flow capacity during emergencies. In addition, water availability through the east interconnection will be improved. Depending on the future location of a new supply well to serve the Highway 12 system, the increased trunk capacity may also be required to allow adequate transmission of the increased supply capacity to the water tower. Long Lake Interconnections Based on computer modeling, not all of the existing interconnections are needed in the future. We recommend that the two primary automatic PRV interconnections are maintained. These two are located at Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard and Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. Two interconnections will provide adequate fire protection during an emergency. In addition, having these on the east and west sides of the distribution system provides for more redundancy of service as well. Upgrades to a 12 inch main along Wayzata Boulevard between Brimhall Avenue and Willow Drive North will also provide a better hydraulic connection for transmission of water during emergency events. WATER SYSTEM EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Purpose The Orono Water System Emergency Preparedness Plan is a detailed description of procedures to follow should disruption to normal water service occur. Water system emergencies can occur as a result of accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failures, drought, and other natural disasters. Disruptions to normal service may affect the entire water system or only parts of the system. While this plan cannot address all potential disasters, it is intended to provide City staff with a procedural guideline for implementation of actions resulting in the restoration of normal water service with a minimum of disruption, and minimizing any potential health risks. This plan is part of the City of Orono Emergency Preparedness Plan. Emergency Telephone Lists The City maintains a list of telephone numbers for key utility and City personnel, contacts in adjacent communities which may be affected, and other key local, state and federal contacts. Current Water Sources and Service Area 'As -Built' plans and specifications for both the Navarre and Highway 12 water systems are located on the City's GIS and Asset Management Systems with hard copies located in the Public Works Map room at 2700 Kelley Parkway. These plans include service area maps as well as groundwater source information, individual well logs and pump specifications. Procedures For Augmenting Water Supplies A number of alternatives exist for augmenting existing water supplies: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 17 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Interconnections with Adjacent Communities Navarre System. Orono's Navarre water system is interconnected with the water systems operated by the City of Minnetonka Beach and the City of Spring Park.. The City of Orono has Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreements with both Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park (see Appendix). The high water level elevation in the Navarre water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. The high water level elevation for Minnetonka Beach's water tower is estimated to be 1091.0 feet. The high water level elevation of Spring Park's water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. Minnetonka Beach has two connection points with Orono - a 10" connection at Old County Road and an 8" connection at Northview Road. Spring Park was two 6" interconnections with Orono, one on Northern Avenue and the other at the intersection of Shadywood and Sunset. In the event that both wells are out of service the Navarre system could potentially be supplied by either the Spring Park or Minnetonka Beach systems, although it would likely place less of a burden on the Spring Park system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 18 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Table 4C-14: Additional Water Resources Other Water Capacity (GPM & List of services, Supply System MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use equipment, supplies Owner available to respond City of Minnetonka 470 GPM, 0.677 417,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT. WATER SUPPLY Beach MGD City of Spring Park 1095D GPM, 1.576 MG 969,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Other Water Capacity (GPM & List of services, Supply System MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use equipment, supplies Owner available to respond City of Long Lake MGD GPM, 1.584 630,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Highway 12 System Four interconnection points exist between Orono's Highway 12 water system and the Long Lake water system at: Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard, Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard, Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard, & Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard. The City of Orono has a Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreement with the City of Long Lake. The high water elevation of the Highway 12 water tower is 1165'. Use Of Surface And Ground Waters As An Alternative Source. None- The nearest surface water source to the Navarre area is Lake Minnetonka. The nearest surface water source to Highway 12 is Long Lake. However, both lakes have a high susceptibility to contamination. Due to the high cost of treatment, neither Lake Minnetonka nor Long Lake are feasible as sources of water. Demand Reduction Procedures Demand Reduction Potential In a water supply emergency, demand could be reduced by implementation of various measures such as voluntary restrictions or a lawn sprinkling ban. Additionally, non- essential high-volume uses such as commercial car washing could be banned. Both measures could potentially result in short term demand reductions. Short -Term Demand Reduction Procedures Orono Municipal Code Section 14-136 establishes regulations for the use of water during periods of water shortage. Subsection 136(e)(1) enumerates a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction. These restrictions are listed in order of progressively increasing stringency: ■ Voluntary restriction, to be implemented via public notice in the local City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 19 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply newspapers, "bill stuffers" and public service announcements. Odd/even watering ban in which residents of addresses ending in an even digit may water on even -numbered calendar days and residents of addresses ending in an odd digit may water on odd -numbered calendar days. Complete or partial ban on water use for watering lawns, trees and shrubs, irrigation, car washing, filling swimming pools, air conditioning, and/or other uses determined by the City to be non-essential, or any combination thereof. Water Emergency Condition Orono Municipal Code Section 14-137 establishes procedures which may be implemented by the City Administrator in the event of a water emergency. The Administrator may order an immediate general sprinkling ban or an odd -even sprinkling ban, and may curtail industrial water use. The Administrator may approve exemptions to such actions, and establish necessary conditions for such exemptions, upon written request from 1) commercial enterprises whose economic well-being is dependent upon sprinkling, irrigating or watering of a lawn, grass or turf owned, leased or operated by such enterprise; 2) employees and agents of the City wherein lawn, grass or turf used for play fields or areas owned or operated by the City require more frequent watering to prevent unreasonable damage thereto; and 3) owners and lessees of lands newly sodded or grass seeded which requires sprinkling or irrigation to prevent loss of new sod, seed or immature turf or grasses. The following actions will be taken to control demand during a Water Emergency Condition: Administrative Actions ■ An educational program that describes the severity and effects ofthe emergency will be instituted. ■ Prohibit outdoor sprinkling on a continual basis. ■ Increase penalties and fees for violation of the sprinkling ordinance. ■ Limit or prohibit swimming pool filling, car washing, and other similar nonessential residential uses. ■ Limit or prohibit use of water for commercial car washes. ■ Restrict restaurants from serving water to customers on a voluntarybasis. ■ Require operators of large air conditioning systems (if they exist) to recycle cooled water as appropriate. Utility Operation Program. The performance of routine public operations shall be redirected to reduce water demand. The following actions which can be easily implemented on a short-term basis may affect the aesthetics of the City but will not harm City facilities on a long-term basis: Reduce sewer cleaning activities. Reduce fire hydrant and main flushing activities to an absolute minimum. Eliminate street cleaning activities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 20 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply ■ Eliminate fire -fighting training practices that utilize water. ■ Purchase water from the City of Long Lake if the emergency condition is limited to the Orono water supply system. PROCEDURES FOR WATER ALLOCATION Allocation of water by the City of Orono may be required during a severe water shortage. When supply augmentation or demand reduction measures are determined to be inadequate, water allocation may be implemented in conformance with the following priorities established by Minnesota Statutes 103G.261: 1. First Priority: Domestic water supply, excluding commercial and industrial uses of municipal water supply, and use for power production that meets the statutory contingency planning requirements. 2. Second Priority: Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons of water per day. Third Priority: Agricultural irrigation, and processing of agricultural products involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 4. Fourth Priority: Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan noted above under "First Priority". 5. Fifth Priority: Uses other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products and power production, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 6. Sixth Priority: Non-essential uses. Non-essential uses are defined in Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as including but not limited to lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, and golf course and park irrigation. Non-essential water uses will be the first water uses subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non-essential uses during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 21 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Triggers For Implementing Plan Components Navarre A water emergency condition for the Navarre system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur: ■ The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or ■ The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reservein storage, or ■ The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds the firm pumping capacity of the system, 720,000 gallons. Highway 12 A water Emergency Conditiong for the Highway 12 system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur: ■ The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or ■ The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reservein storage, or ■ The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds 575,000 GPD, i.e. approximately 80% of the 720,000 GPD system capacity. Wayzata System Extension The Wayzata system extension is a small part of the total Wayzata system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City ofWayzata will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Wayzata System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Long Lake System Extensions The Long Lake system extensions are a small part of the total Long Lake system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City of Long Lake will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Long Lake System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Notice City ordinances define two levels of urgency in establishing water use restrictions. During periods of water shortage which are not considered to be water emergencies, the City Council may implement restrictions by resolution or Ordinance. Such resolution shall define: the uses of water that will be restricted; the types of water supply that will be restricted, such as the public water system, private wells, lake or other surface water systems; times during which the restriction will apply; whether the use restriction will apply to all property in the City or will vary depending on City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 22 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply location or identification of property; when the restrictions will be implemented and when they will terminate; and whether the restrictions will be voluntary or involuntary. Notice of the restrictions will be posted on the website, sent via social media and direct mailings and published in the local newspaper, and will become effective 24 hours after passage and publication. If the City Administrator determines that the water pressure and available water in the municipal water system reaches a level which endangers the public health or safety, he may declare a water emergency. Upon such declaration, notice will be given to the news media, social media and city website, and all orders restricting water use shall be enforceable one (1) hour from the time of such notice. Enforcement By ordinance, violation of a mandatory water use restriction is a misdemeanor. The City of Orono has not established penalty charges for non-compliance. Failure to comply after repeated notices will lead to discontinued water service (Section 14-75). Water use restrictions will be monitored by Citystaff and enforced as necessary CONSERVATION PLAN Role Of Conservation. The City of Orono Water Conservation Plan is intended to reduce the demand for water, improve the efficiency of use of water, and reduce losses and waste of water. Water conservation has the potential to delay or eliminate the need for development of supplemental water sources to meet peak demands for nonessential water uses. Reduction in the peak demand through conservation efforts is preferable to major City expenditures for increasing water source, treatment and storage capacities. Water Conservation Potential. For the Navarre System, a primarily residential service area, conservation efforts will be focused on ensuring the wise use of water as well as updating the treatment facility and making system repairs as necessary. As the residential housing stock is renovated by homeowners, City enforcement of the State plumbing codes will ensure use of water efficient fixtures. The Highway 12 system serves a variety of users including both single- family and multi -family residential uses that are still developing, commercial and industrial uses, and the Orono Schools complex. New homes will be required by State plumbing codes to install water -efficient fixtures. New or expanding commercial, industrial, and institutional users will be encouraged (and required when appropriate) to establish water - conserving policies and use water -efficient equipment. Water Conservation Programs The city will endeavor to implement the MnDNR Conservation Objectives and Strategies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 23 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply MnDNR objectives 1. MnDNR Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non -Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%. The city is currently meeting this objective. Thorough water audits, leak detection and preventive maintenance. 2. MnDNR Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD). The city is meeting this objective with a 5 year average per capita demand of 73 Gal/day. The average residential per capita water demand has been on a downward trend since a high of 93.4 gpcd in 2006 to a low of 60.2 gpcd in 2015. 3. MnDNR Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use. Education- The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from the DNR and MDH. There is very little C/UI or Ag water usage within the City of Orono. 4. MnDNR Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand. The Residential per capita water demand has been trending downward since 2005, with a years of spikes within the data. These spikes can likely be attributed to years with less rainfall, which leads to greater irrigation use within the residential sector. It is likely that the trend will continue downward as time progresses due to increased education about water use and a recently revised water rate structure. The C/UI per capita water demand appears to be trending downward overall with various spikes and fluctuations throughout the years. These sometimes large fluctuations can be attributed to the smaller and ever changing client base that is present in the City within the C/UI category. 5. MnDNR Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day (peak day) to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6. Calculate a ten-year average (2005 — 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand is 4.8. This high ratio is likely due to excessive irrigation in the summer months. The city will continue to encourage responsible water use though educational efforts and discourage individual high water use through our tiers water rate structure. 6. MnDNR Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 24 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City Conservation Strategies 1. Metering. All water customers on Orono's three water systems are metered. All new users added to the system will be metered. All customers purchase meters through the City, and meters are tested, recalibrated, and repaired on an as -required basis. Meters are read by City personnel quarterly. 2. Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair. The volume of unaccounted-for water is determined on an annual basis. Unaccounted- for water is defined as the volume of water withdrawn from the source minus the volume of water sold. Water not accounted for may be a result of meter under -registration; various forms of public unmetered use such as hydrant flushing, appropriation by fire departments, and illegal connections or appropriations; or system leakage. The city conducts annual leak detection as a means of identifying and repair leaks. 3. Conservation -Oriented Water Rates. Water customers are billed quarterly. Water rates are reviewed by the City annually and adjusted as necessarywith the goal of paying for the true cost of supplying, treating and delivering water as well as maintaining the distribution system. Past reviews have resulted in the adoption of a hydrant charge to those properties where water is available but unconnected. Capital expenditures are financed through the use of connection charges, area charges, and special assessments. Since 2010 the city has used a conservation -oriented water rate structure. The conservation -oriented structure establishes Water Usage Tiers that vary between residential, multi -family and commercial users and are based on usage. 4. Regulation. Orono has adopted a number of regulations to provide short-term demand reductions and long-term improvements in water use efficiencies: ■ Short -Term Demand Reduction Procedures: Municipal Code Sections 14-136 and 14-137 define measures for short-term demand reduction. The Code identifies a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction, and provides procedures for enforcement of such measures. ■ Long -Term Demand Reduction: Long-term demand reduction will be accomplished by enforcement of the State and Federal Plumbing Codes which require the use of water efficient fixtures in new home construction as well as when retrofitting. 5. Education and Information Programs. The City of Orono will make an effort to promote efficient water use on an ongoing basis. Education of the public on the benefits of water conservation will include articles City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 25 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply in the City newsletter as well as the use of "bill stuffers", and support for school curriculums on water resources such as National Drinking Water Week. During periods of limited water supplies when public awareness is high, the City will issue public service announcements through the local mass media including local newspapers, and will notify the public via direct mailings of water conservation and demand reduction measures in effect. 6. Retrofitting Programs. Existing plumbing codes requiring the use of water -conserving fixtures when retrofitting buildings, will continue to be enforced by the Building Inspections Department. The City will investigate whether establishment of a mandatory retrofitting program unrelated to concurrent remodeling projects wouldbe feasible or cost efficient. GOALS AND POLICIES The City of Orono's water supply goals are as follows: 1. Provide an adequate supply of potable water to all residences and occupied properties in Orono. 2. Provide an adequate supply of water for fire protection in urban -density neighborhoods and commercial/industrial districts in Orono. 3. Protect the Cities natural resources- Water. The City of Orono's water supply policies are as follows: 1. All occupied properties within Orono shall be provided with a potable water supply and minimum sanitary facilities as required by the Minnesota Health Department. 2. Individual wells will be considered to be acceptable water supply for low- density urban and rural residential neighborhoods. Industrial, commercial and multi -family residential development will be permitted only within the municipal water service area where supplies are sufficient for domestic, process and fire protection purposes. 3. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only within the Urban Service Area. Rural land use must be of the type and density to be adequately served by individual private wells. 4. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only where sufficient land use density and/or user demand will make the public investment economically feasible. Municipal water systems will not be extended to all neighborhoods in the urban service area. Many urban residential areas that received municipal sewer for public health and environmental reasons have relatively low land use density and can be adequately served by private wells at much less total cost than by extensive water system City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 26 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply extension. 5. New urban developments will be served by developer -installed mains. Municipal water mains may be extended within the boundaries of the urban area to serve new development on vacant properties provided the development occurs at the established zoned density, the development does not overburden or exceed the design capacity of the existing system, and the developer pays and finances the entire cost of the project. 6. The city will operate and maintain the municipal water system. To assure cost effectiveness and quality control, the City will own, operate andmaintain the entire municipal water system of mains and laterals up to and including the curb stop on each property. Each property owner must purchase a meter from the City and install it in an approved manner and location. 7. All water serviced properties must be connected. No new well or well repair permits will be issued where municipal water service is available. Existing operable wells may be used provided the water is potable and the well conforms to MHD requirements. Individual connections will be required for each separate residence and/or place of business. 8. Water service construction will conform to state codes. Installation of new building service lines, connection stubs, or water mains shall be by licensed plumbing contractors, and installation or repair of wells shall be by licensed well drillers; all construction shall utilize materials and methods approved by the Minnesota State Board of Health. 9. The City will endeavor to meet the MnDNRs Conservation Objectives. FUTURE WATER SYSTEM Orono's pan for future water facilities includes upgrades to existing local water facilities. Future Water System Improvements The City's focus on future water system needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area and maintenance of the existing system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 27 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Future Water System Expansion Proiects The table below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 4C-15: Future Expansion Projects Improvement Projected Year of Triggering Event completion Orono Preserve Development — Water Under 1 Distribution main to serve 39 single family 2018 Construction homes Shadywood Villas Development -Water Under 2 Distribution to service 7 single family 2018 Construction homes. CSAH 112 Water Main Extension- Approved Extension of water main West along CSAH Preliminary Plat 4 112 from Old Crystal Bay Road to serve 2019' for future developments planned on the south Developments side of CSAH 112. 5 Highway 12 Water Main upsize to 12". 2020 CSAH 112 Turn back Ph3 project 1 Schedule is dependent on development timing, size and/or location. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 28 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Future Sewer Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing sanitary sewer system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 4C-16: Future Sewer Maintenance Needs Resourcing City water service will be self-supporting. The operation, maintenance and depreciation financing of the municipal water supply system will be completely financed by user charges sufficient to cover all allocable costs without requiring any general tax subsidy. Water charges shall be equitably established on the basis of actual use and/or fire protection advantage while at the same time designed to encourage resource conservation. Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's water system. Funding will continue to come from the Water fees. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 29 Annual Program Description Purpose Budget (2018$s) This project includes the replacement Many of the city's water mains were Water Main of select water mains in within the installed in late 1960s and early 1970s and replacements system. Where possible utility are cast iron pipe. Over the years the city $200,000 replacements are synchronized with has had issues with cast iron pipe road reconstructions. deterioration based. Valve Each year all of the Water Valves Ensures proper operation. Helps identify $5,000 Exercising within the city should be exercised. future replacement needs. Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Hydrant will consist of Cured in Place Pipe Sanitary sewer systems. The lining process Flushing (CIPP) lining of infiltration susceptible creates and new durable pipe within the $265,225 sanitary sewer pipes, manhole older pipe at a much reduced cost from open reconstruction, and lid replacement. curing or directionally drilling. Well inspection This project includes the inspection and To ensure a continued dependable supply of ppp y and rehabilitation/ replacement of a Well's ' quality water from the City's well periodic $20,000 maintenance pumps, motors, and column piping. maintenance is required Each well is inspected every 7 years. This project includes the replacement Water Meter of all of the water meters within the Meters need have a 15 year life. $90,000 Replacement city. The project will be phased over 5 ears. Pressure wash of north water tower, inside and out; perform repairs to Water Tower interior and exterior coatings and Preventive maintenance $12,500 Maintenance perform preventive maintenance checks and services. (Once every 5 years) Resourcing City water service will be self-supporting. The operation, maintenance and depreciation financing of the municipal water supply system will be completely financed by user charges sufficient to cover all allocable costs without requiring any general tax subsidy. Water charges shall be equitably established on the basis of actual use and/or fire protection advantage while at the same time designed to encourage resource conservation. Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's water system. Funding will continue to come from the Water fees. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 29 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures for the Water system as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City's goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements Funding for Water system Capital improvement projects comes from the Enterprise Water Fund, special assessments, and connection charges. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 30 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN Page Introduction 2 Public Safety Services 3 Public Education 5 Government Agencies and Services Privately Operated Utilities and Services 9 City Owned Land, Rights, and Easements 11 Coordination with Adjoining Municipalities 13 Appendix A Map 4D-1: School District Boundaries Appendix B Map 4D-2: Telephone Service Areas Appendix C Map 4D-3: Telephone Service Areas City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 1 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Community Management Plan includes a brief review of all the many other necessary services and facilities of a municipality that were not mandated elements of Twin Cities Regional planning. The elements contained in this Chapter have varying degrees of impact upon metropolitan systems, but they all have important ties to Orono's local planning development and land use concerns. The Goals, Policies and Plans outlined in this Chapter are an integral part of the total Community Management Plan and have been derived from joint and concurrent consideration of all community planning elements. This Chapter of the CMP is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1 The Public Services Plan is intended to place the identified services and facilities within the context of the overall Community Management Plan. 2 The Public Services Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials and City staff in the development and management of municipal services and facilities necessary to support the basic planning objectives of the City. -1 The Public Services Plan is intended to advise our neighboring municipalities and other governmental agencies of our intended service levels, and our intention to continue cooperative service arrangements. SCOPE The Public Services Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's public service requirements complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, fiscal responsibility and general land use. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 2 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES POLICE SERVICES Orono has had an independent police force since 1962. The Police Department operates out of headquarters facilities located in the City administrative complex on Old Crystal Bay Road North. Orono Police currently provide contract services to the citizens of Long Lake, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Police Service Goals 1. To create and maintain a feeling of security in the community. 2. To reduce the opportunity for the commission of crimes. 3. To aid individuals having medical emergencies or who are in danger of physical harm, and to assist those who cannot care for themselves. 4. To identify criminal offenders and criminal activity and, where appropriate, to apprehend offenders and participate in subsequent court proceedings. 5. To resolve conflict. 6. To protect constitutional guarantees and to promote and preserve civil order. 7. To identify potentially serious law enforcement problems. 8. To facilitate the efficient and hazard -free movement of people and vehicles. 9. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Police Service Policies In order to achieve the stated Police Service Goals, the Orono Police Department will be operated and administered according to the following policies: A basic level of routine police services will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. The level of routine services provided in the Rural Area is not to be as extensive or as frequent as that level necessary in the more densely developed urban neighborhoods. 2. Twenty-four (24) hour emergency response will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. 3. Orono will participate in active mutual aid arrangements with police departments in adjoining jurisdictions. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 3 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 4. Orono will rely on technical support from other agencies including the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office. 5. Orono will embrace the "Community Oriented Policing" concept. 6. The Orono Police Reserve program will continue. 7. Orono expects to continue contract services with adjoining municipalities. Police Service Plans Orono intends to continue operation of the Orono Police Department and provide contract services to adjacent municipalities consistent with their desires. The size and abilities of the Department will be consistent with and dependent upon the land use type and density within the Department's jurisdiction. Police department funding, including contract service costs, will be based upon the level of service desired. FIRE SERVICES Fire protection services in Orono are contracted with the Long Lake Fire Department. Fire Service Goals 1. To encourage fire prevention practices. 2. To provide fire protection and fire suppression services. 3. To provide reasonable levels of total fire services within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Fire Service Policies In order to achieve reasonable levels of fire protection for Orono citizens, the City expects to provide and administer fire services according to the following policies: 1. Fire prevention is the first step toward reduction in fire loss damages. The City has adopted and will enforce the State Fire Code (which incorporates the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association Code). 2. A basic level of fire protection services will be provided consistent with land use type and density. Urban areas will be expected to require more frequent fire services and more extensive fire services than that necessary in rural areas. Fire protection levels will be expected to be higher where municipal water is available than where water supplies must be transported to the scene. 3. Each of the contracting fire departments will be expected to provide all necessary administration, equipment and manpower to provide adequate service within their district. Each of the two contracting fire departments is a municipally -operated volunteer fire department. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 4 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 4. Orono expects to contribute its fair share of fire department expenses. Both fire protection contracts are written with the respective municipality and not directly with the fire department. Orono will expect to contribute its fair share of the costs of equipping and operating each fire department in comparison to Orono's relative service requirements. Fire Service Plans Orono intends to continue contracting for fire services from Long Lake. Land use type or density in areas not provided with municipal water will not be increased beyond the capability of rural water -hauling fire tactics. PUBLIC EDUCATION Orono is served by four local School Districts in addition to a number of private elementary and pre- schools, a private charter school, and a privately operated art center which provides nationally recognized art education to the public. Orono's four local school districts serve geographic areas of the City as indicated on Map 4D-1. Each of the four districts provides its own full service program of educational services for grades Kindergarten through Twelve, plus special education, recreation and community service programs. Each District is operated independent of the City by a separately elected School Board. Each District provides and manages its own student transportation services. And, since each District has its own tax powers, there is considerable difference in total property tax mill levy between different neighborhoods in the City. Minnetonka School District No. 276, This School District has the smallest area of the City within its borders serving only the two small sections of Big Island. The odd arrangement of this boundary dates back to some of the former township realignments in 1868 and 1889. It is doubtful that any Minnetonka students actually reside in Orono as only seasonal cottages are located on these portions of the island. Westonka School District No. 277. This School District includes all of the Navarre Area, the major portion of Orono's Urban Service Area, and a small amount of rural land on our western border. All Orono students are now bused to their classrooms in Mound or Minnetrista: Mound Westonka High School, Sunnyfield Road, Minnetrista (Grades 8-12) Grandview Middle School, Commerce Boulevard, Mound (Grades 5-7) Shirley Hills Primary School, Wilshire Blvd., Mound (Grades pre -K - 4) Hilltop Primary School, Game Farm Road, Minnetrista (Grades pre -K - 4) Most of Orono's land area within District 277 is fully developed and urbanized with very little potential for major population increase. Many homes in this area are occupied by older persons whose families have grown, thereby reducing student population. Since no school facilities are located in Orono, Orono's facilities plans have no direct impact on District 277. Orono School District No. 278. This School District includes more of Orono's land area than all other districts combined. Most of this District is within Orono's Rural Area where total planned density is relatively low. However, this is also where most of Orono's remaining development will occur. Therefore, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 5 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan student population from this area of Orono is likely to remain steady or slightly increase over the next 10- 20 years. Because of the low land use density and the distances involved, almost all Orono students are now bused or driven to their classrooms on the Orono campus located on Old Crystal Bay Road between County Road 6 and Wayzata Boulevard. Included in this facility are: Orono High School, 795 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 9-12) Orono Middle School, 800 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 6-8) Orono Intermediate School, 685 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 3-5) Schumann Elementary School, 765 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades K-2) The Orono Schools have continually upgraded facilities in Orono, including a high school auditorium in 1981, the Link between the Middle School and Schumann Elementary in 1990, and a new High School media center in 2000. The new Middle School opened in the fall of 2000, expanding the school's campus to the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road. The City has no plan or intent to close Old Crystal Bay Road as a result of this expansion. Orono does plan to study the current school and City facilities driveway access layout along Old Crystal Bay Road to determine whether a more efficient and safe access system can be established. The City has ample municipal water supply to serve the Orono Schools facilities. Orono's municipal sewer capacity downstream from the school campus is currently adequate to accommodate all known planned school facility needs. Wayzata School District No. 284. This School District includes a small section of Orono's eastern edge including fully developed neighborhoods within the Urban Area and some homes in the Rural Area. A significant portion of this District's Orono land area is within the Wayzata Country Club's golf course or within the DNR's Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area. Because of these long term land uses, and the low density planned rural land use, the potential for student population from this portion of Orono is very limited. Compared with the major increases in population occurring in this District in Plymouth, any change in Orono student population would be insignificant. Under current zoning, approximately 125 households in Orono will ultimately be served by Wayzata Schools. All Orono students are bused to classrooms in Wayzata or Plymouth. Facilities used by Orono students include: Wayzata High School, Peony Lane, Plymouth (Grades 9-12) Wayzata West Middle School, Barry Avenue, Wayzata (Grades 6-8) Gleason Lake Elementary, County Road 101, Plymouth (Grades K-5) None of these facilities are expected to be closed in the future. Any new facilities will likely be constructed in Plymouth where major population increases are occurring. Since no school facilities are located in Orono, Orono's facilities plans have no direct impact on District 284. The Minnetonka Center for Arts and Education offers instruction and facilities for all forms of artistic expression. The Art Center was established in the early 1970's as a local, privately operated place for artistic endeavors. Since that time, facilities have been provided for all -forms of education and hands- on art experience. The Art Center is privately operated and privately financed, but enrollment is open to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 6 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan all. Many Orono residents are active participants as are persons from the entire metropolitan area. Orono residents have ready access to all metropolitan educational facilities. Orono is within daily commuting distance of all the many educational institutions in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area including the University of Minnesota, community colleges, vocational schools and many private colleges, universities and specialty schools. This ready availability amply supplements the schools and institutions located within our borders. Public Education Policies 1. The City will take no direct role in determining educational needs. This is the responsibility of the separate school districts. 2. The City will encourage coordination of facilities and programs between those districts serving Orono. Orono and surrounding communities have limited populations and limited taxation capabilities. The City will encourage all reasonable forms of cooperation between school districts so as to avoid unnecessary duplication of staff or facilities. The City will coordinate community service programs with the school districts. Although each is administered separately, the City and School Districts are used and financed by the same citizens. It is only reasonable to expect cooperation so that improved community services such as recreation programs will be able to utilize available facilities and talents without duplication of effort or cost. Public Education Plans Orono's projected slow rate of population growth should not require the provision of any new educational facilities in any of the four local school districts, other than those facilities already planned. Orono's public facilities plans have no impact on the Wayzata, Minnetonka or Westonka School Districts because they have no facilities located in Orono. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND SERVICES This Section provides a brief review of the several public agencies that have jurisdiction over certain subjects in Orono, and a review of special services which have direct benefit to many Orono residents. A review of these subjects is not a mandated element of regional planning, but their inclusion in this CMP is indicative of their relationship to environmental conditions and land use planning. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 7 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan U. S. POSTAL SERVICE Addresses within Orono are tied to one of 5 different zip codes. There is no unique zip code for Orono. The lack of a single post office serving the entire City has long been a point of discussion among residents who may, for instance, live in the City of Orono, have children attending the Mound Schools, and have a mailing address of Wayzata, Excelsior or Mound. Figure 4D-1 zip codes Postal Service Goal To have the U.S. Postal Service allow the use of the City name "Orono" with the appropriate post office zip code, which will lend cohesiveness and identity to our community. Postal Service Policy Orono will encourage the Postal Service to establish a separate "Orono" zip code or to utilize one of the existing rural route zip codes, combined with the use of "Orono, Minnesota", as the City address. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 8 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan PRIVATELY OPERATED UTILITIES AND SERVICES Citizens and properties in Orono are provided with power and communication services by public utility companies operating under public regulation and franchise. Sanitation services are provided by private haulers operating under license from the City. As in other elements of the CMP, the availability of service levels varies between the urban and rural portions of the City. In addition, electricity and telephone service districts are each divided between two different utility companies making coordination with City officials and City policy more involved than if only one company were involved. Electrical Service Electrical service is provided in Orono by two separate utilities. Northern States Power (NSP) provides service to most of Orono with local offices in Shorewood. Wright -Hennepin Co-op Electric Association, with offices in Rockford, provides service to a few properties in northern and northwestern Orono. The service areas are divided as shown on Map 4D-2. Cable Television & Communication Service Orono is provided with cable television service by Mediacom, the franchise holder which currently owns and maintains the cable television infrastructure in the Lake Minnetonka area. Not all homes in Orono are currently provided with cable service, which relies on a minimum level of residential development density in order to financially justify the infrastructure costs. Local programming and franchise administration are under the auspices of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission (LMCC), a joint powers organization consisting of 17 of the smaller cities around Lake Minnetonka. In terms of franchise administration, the LMCC controls rates on basic service, reviews technical standards and compliance, ensures that the cable operator is meeting the needs of the community in customer service, and provides quality television production facilities and training for the local communities. In terms of local programming, LMCC operates a television production studio in Spring Park and generates local programming which is broadcast over two local access channels. A total of four channels are dedicated to local Public, Educational and Governmental programming ("PEG Access"). Private Utility & Sanitation Service Goal To provide all citizens and all areas of the City with adequate levels of service in the most economical manner possible consistent with Orono's urban -rural land use plans. Sanitation Policies Each resident will be responsible for his own sanitation requirements. The City will require by ordinance that all residents individually contract with a licensed hauler for regular pickup and removal of all garbage, trash, and rubbish. 2. Licensed haulers will be responsible for all administrative requirements including arranging for their own disposal sites. Rates, routes and schedules shall be determined by the hauler. Locating an approved disposal site and paying City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 9 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan all disposal costs shall be the responsibility of the hauler. 3. The City will encourage all recycling and resource recovery activities. Too much solid waste is being generated by all citizens. The City will encourage conservation measures by the citizens, by the haulers, by independent operators and by all levels of government. The City will encourage returnable bottles and cans and a general reduction in the volume of packaging materials. The City will encourage organics recycling. 4. The City will encourage neighborhood clean-up campaigns. At least once a year, the City will provide a local disposal site for trash and debris to encourage a general housecleaning and city-wide spruce -up of back yards, road sides, and vacant lots. Sanitation Plans 1. The City will continue the practice of private sanitation and haulage without direct public involvement in this activity. 2. The City will investigate the establishment of a recycling center or facility within Orono to encourage energy conservation and reduction in solid waste generation. 3. The City will participate with Hennepin County and other municipalities to find alternative waste disposal solutions. Management Of Utility Conduits Private Utility Policies 1. Utility placement will be permitted in public rights-of-way. 2. The City will require dedication of appropriate utility easements in all new subdivisions. 3. The City will require that utilities provided to new developments be placed underground whenever feasible. 4. The provision of utilities to new developments will be a private responsibility and will not be coordinated by the City nor provided with any public financial support. Utility regulation, including rate charges, shall be by the State Public Service Commission and shall not be by the City. The City will not intervene in any problems or complaints between customers and private utility companies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 10 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 6. No private utility connection permits will be required from the City except that street opening permits will be required whenever a utility excavates within any public street right-of-way. CITY OWNED LAND, RIGHTS, AND EASEMENTS City Owned Easements The City has equitable interest in various types of easements across privately owned property throughout the City. The underlying property owner retains fee title to the property, but his use is limited in various ways according to terms of the particular easement. The City's rights are strictly limited to the purposes and conditions of the particular easement. These easements are described below according to their intended purpose: Underlying Road Easements. The Transportation Plan includes provisions for privately owned and maintained roads particularly in the rural area. In all cases where private roads are allowed, the City will as a condition of the subdivision require dedication and recording of a permanent underlying public ingress, egress and access easement. These easements will ensure legal access of the public to all properties served by the private road. Further, the City will by ordinance and easement conditions, guarantee that all private roads are maintained to City standards at all times through required maintenance agreements and/or homeowner's associations, and that failure of the private group to so maintain their private road will be cause for the City to accomplish needed maintenance and to assess the benefited properties for the direct cost of such maintenance. The existence of these easements will not in and of itself indicate any intention of the City to acquire and/or to regularly maintain the subject private roads, but only provides a legal contingency to assure general public -safety as well as public access to all building sites. Utility Easements. The City will as much as possible locate all public utilities on publicly owned rights-of-way. Particularly in the case of sewer lines, however, this is not always feasible in Orono's hilly terrain. The need for gravity flow often requires a sewer location to run across private properties, quite often between the homes and the lakeshore. In these instances, the City will acquire permanent utility easements to allow such placement and to permit regular maintenance activities to occur. The typical easement is at least 10 and does preclude any temporary or permanent construction over the sewer route. The existence of these underground utilities and the appurtenant easement seldom affects the appearance or use of the property, other than the construction limitation. In addition to the above, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage and utility" easements along most lot lines to facilitate lot drainage and the installation of utilities such as sewer, water, power and telephone without the need for separate legal instruments. Drainage Easements. As in the case of utility easements, the City's topography often has resulted in natural drainageways running over privately owned property. Non -obstruction of the natural City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 11 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan drainage system is protected by our local environmental ordinances because such natural systems often are not covered by legal easements. Drainage easements are utilized where the City has constructed and/or maintains a storm drainage system across private property. These easements do legally record the non -obstruction requirements as well as provide for City maintenance access. In addition, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage easements" along all natural creeks and drainageways and over all designated marshland or wetland. Flowage & Conservation Easements and Covenants for Wetland and Wetland Buffer Protection. Orono's Environmental Preservation and Surface Water Management Plans, as well as certain City Ordinances, have identified and designated wetlands, marshland and flood plains throughout the City that are to be permanently protected and preserved from encroachment or alteration. Whenever land containing such features is subdivided or developed, the City will require the land owner to dedicate a permanent flowage and conservation easement to the City over the affected portion of his land. Open Space Easements. In certain development situations, the City may have particular interest in permanently precluding certain types of improvements or in permanently protecting views or natural conditions or otherwise private property. This protection may be in return for allowing use or development of other areas of the property. In these circumstances, the City will require dedication of a permanent open space easement identifying the protected area and describing permitted and on -permitted uses or alterations. Open space easements may be temporary or permanent depending upon the circumstance. Open space easements will be filed in the chain of title of the subject property. Trail Easements. In locations where the City trail system has been or will be constructed, a Trail Easement will be acquired, either at the time property is subdivided (often as part of the required Park Dedication associated with land development) or via purchase or other means. Trail easements will be filed on the chain of title of the property, and will allow the use of the land by the City for the construction of a trail and permanent access by the public. TAX FORFEITED LANDS Many areas of Orono were platted and partially developed as much as 100 years ago, often into extremely small parcels. Many of these lots have never been developed because of their size, location or, often, because they are wetlands. They are not separately buildable because of land use and environmental constraints. Consequently, there are a number of lots that have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes and for which title is held by the State of Minnesota. The City of Orono does not encourage tax forfeiture, but likewise the City will not permit use of extremely substandard or environmentally protected lands. Where tax forfeited lots exist, the City will pursue the following policies: I. Encourage purchase by adjacent land owners for inclusion with their properties, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 12 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan normally requiring legal combination of the tax forfeit parcel with the adjacent land. 2. Encourage sale and private development of those parcels large enough to accommodate an occupancy consistent with the City's land use plans and zoning performance standards particularly where they can be used for low and moderate income housing pursuant to the Housing Plan. Review and acquire for park purposes lots or larger parcels of sufficient size and location to be used for neighborhood mini -parks or play areas, or which are adjacent to and would be an appropriate addition to existing park or open space lands. 4. Review and acquire for flowage and conservation purposes those lots totally or significantly covered by marshland or wetland or which would have value for the City's surface water management system. COORDINATION WITH ADJOINING MUNICIPALITES The City of Orono has a long history of collaboration with the many municipalities who share its borders. This is illustrated by existing and ongoing shared services such as municipal sewer and water interconnections, building inspection services, police and fire department services, etc. Orono remains supportive of continued cooperation with adjoining municipalities in the provision of public services, and will work together with its neighbors on matters of common interest. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 13 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN School Districts February 2018 co Katrina rn Turner Road J j 2 Lake Moon �o Lake Tr1oy .• Z 6thq .�.•' '� — �� 19thAve� r Drake Dr o v 3 �e,� • y o Dic Z moa • Lake �! La c ♦ Sp g�: a� Ctee" tir pve N Classenp R aAN = Lydiard e Kelley P{c�y ? �r Lake �0 a 0 + >, m � 1 c,. R Daniels St r� 1 E' 8th Ave,N tiY`Pve, o Oen d 1 Orchard Ln Wayza'N'12 o, �, 1 0 5 Moline Road Q. 4VJ ;� m 1 a Grand Ave v . roti �iL• oh I 1 4 1 g °N'hRO '4ake�.p�•. • y 3rd,AveN 79 N Vo 26 tde = 0 M � ` I 12 ,°ark st E J h !.0 ` r 10, La Rice S F lata Blvd E 4 Stubbs % 1 1 1 ke St F d ► �, 1 1go °a ± Bay •r . tv, , i ' � � 1 PainterR ��� .a ■ 1 ♦� i �� o ♦ � O Fox St e W Branch Road` c�,y�eva Ln 1 caa County Road 151 1 r North Brown i Fey Wayzata Tanage Bay Bay Ud 1 -1 Arm Maxwell ake i Bay V French i Sunnyfield Road E Forest Z Marsh i a Z Lake D i o° c Jenning's Bay m c = NS hore Drr°� Smith i Game Farm Road E T t` y „ Bracketts i Point i t w� 0 West`� 4% ♦ i Dutch 01 1 Arm Crystal Bohns I %� _ i Lake m Bay Point4►l 4V& *a i 41 oftd garrison ��� ����,;,,,,,r;,1,- E y ` 1 i o Lynwood Blvd E 0-4. i o v Legend '. _r: City Limits ++t 2040 MUSA �N E Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Z c J N ° Highland Ave£ 3 a°, yJo Lafayette i 4 Rutledge Road �_ p w S^ Bay II �� La R 72Day PI School Districts Sprint i �+� Minnetonka Wayzata o Pa Carman's r` ! �� _'a Ba; Bay �� r0a,, Orono Westonka L 1 ! ♦ t rn R~� Ca: f'��� �,� Poli i Figure 4F-1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Electrical Service Areas February 2018 Katrina \ r _ ,-,iti rn 2 -..Z...._.._.,_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._,._MoonTurner Roado LakeTry Drake Dr 100........L � .•. rad '� s� q�e •1 19th Ave 01r 3 ♦ti v a ♦ p� .. Glee ` Pve N L r.. ; z ' Mpy g�� 1A �� Kelley P.kvi`1 - o ong r a°•� a Q f1 Z ♦♦ T i m �M 4 1 d' O c + a ♦ m % Ora, a 1 ,� ± �oaa �°, , N■ 2 Daniels St 1 i -yam 8th Ave, N yP�e! o + JOe�� d 1 Orchard 9' Wayzata ! +ia� S 1 v Moline Road a i g o�Ow m � !1 + Grand Ave n e� "ti ��� oake • h `ti 9r . i< x,40 ♦ 1 1 3rd, N 19N r � i��••'�"��►��♦�"'�� 1 0�r IRS (n 40-40D ONE • VIN says 1 f ♦ 1 �� \• 1 ♦ 1 .. �ewe 26 ode R 1 • ♦ 1 _ . Frr�y 11 _ , . _ `P_ °aa i ♦ 1 gym. C'0c 1 (_ AMP1 f ; 12 ark St E � 1 _j°� l,o_= I �� 1 L Ripe S eY2atta Blvd E akeS rR°ad • 1 �� 1..1 1 "" tE �\ Paints �� \ / L) 40 FOX St ♦I i��i°r0 W Branch Road rw° ' IA drv`e* Ln , i `cap° County Road 151 1 1 �r 11 ♦ �� Wayzata �� +� 1,♦ gay t r � 1 Sunnyfield Road E o z 1 v i 0 c Jenning'. Bay m m N Shore Dr of i Game Farm Road E T �►` �� i � I ♦ i Dutch Lake m Irl 4%N Harrison Bay �� i 1 j o Lynwood Blvd E j t! o v o p1 i i 0 M i A Highland Ave£ 3 ° v I w r Shoreline Dr ocr'! j i , Lafayette 4 Rutledge Road etiw �• �� i-----� Bay �J# �� La Legend e ! °''� ` �� �,►'� `r� agar Electrical Service Areas __r: City Limits ++ZEI t 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Sprint .tea P� ! �� Ba; ! �✓ 1 �� Aare °� ! �� : r ♦ j I, 1 eW� 4%� 4%� -3a,,t �''on�ts it - i Xcel Energy BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Z c J N Wright -Hennepin CO-OP Figure 417-2 U 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Telephone Service Areas February 2018 co Turner Road 0 ...012 ._.�...� .^, .. _ . ..._�,.�_..._.._.��..�,..._-• �..y.n_.... ` 9 9i< � . ` ... Moon t ado .Z._...+.•...._.._.._.,_.._..�.._.._..�.._.._..� Troy '�6`q�e •� y 1 Drake or 19 N r Cn 1 ,► � '� � ♦ �'� ��, 1 o'r �� ad 1 r 26 - P R 1 • 1 _ � • + N 1 z o ��Sprtn `Z� ir y 9 �4 Uzi Geek yet _ .. _ 1 �f 12 Pie �wc 1 .,a m 0 3 Kelley �pk.4 o°L�I o. 01 1 d J 0# 4 �Oaa 0 � " M m m mm■ *vow � , 2 �" "0"'�'S St �� � I La oad X �Oe� 1 .. 1 Orchard�� WayzatON`alo, ♦ s 1 LLI Moline Road a .�,� m � � ♦ ®/ � 1 a Grand Ave n �Sr�`�-. ��• oh 11 4 1 0 z � o m Game Farm Road E �° 'o Dutch v v Lake >i Legend City Limits a' t1 2040 MUSA Jenning Bay Harrison Bay i 3 of i 6. O N Shore Dr ore i i A4 R i Arm Crystal 4k i 44r.R ��Iy La Wayzata Bay N QBOLTON MENK er 11 1* �*# ♦� Igar Telephone Service Areas Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT ! e 0SPI f Pa ,1► o % Bay ! I 04% I` Ad� I ! It �,. Q ♦4 Point i Real People. Real Solutions. J M 10, Ave z c J Citizens Phone Century Link 'cc Figure 4F-3 y wo ROad � 0 ` 9 9i< � . ` i * " ak1,Qo ♦ 1 y 1 1 19 N r Cn 1 ,► � '� � ♦ �'� ��, 1 o'r � 1 i, r 26 - P R 1 • 1 _ � ■rr� y 4w C'o _ .. _ 1 �f 12 1 d J im oad .. N paints,rn r � � ♦ ®/ 1 � ��� � .n O � / ♦ � i � � �' Fox St m W Branch Road !W° ' ; �♦ d�`eW Ln 1 ,♦ i 1 `cam County Road 151 1 1h PM ,♦ i Fe `11 II�1 i Bp,� Sunnyfield Road E Z j 0 z � o m Game Farm Road E �° 'o Dutch v v Lake >i Legend City Limits a' t1 2040 MUSA Jenning Bay Harrison Bay i 3 of i 6. O N Shore Dr ore i i A4 R i Arm Crystal 4k i 44r.R ��Iy La Wayzata Bay N QBOLTON MENK er 11 1* �*# ♦� Igar Telephone Service Areas Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT ! e 0SPI f Pa ,1► o % Bay ! I 04% I` Ad� I ! It �,. Q ♦4 Point i Real People. Real Solutions. J M 10, Ave z c J Citizens Phone Century Link 'cc Figure 4F-3 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4E PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL PLAN Introduction 2 Park Classification and Definitions 2 Table 4E-1 Parks Classifications and Definitions 2 Existing Park, Open Space and Trail System Inventory 4 Table 4E-2 Parks Facilities 4 Table 4E-3 Regional Facilities 5 Table 4E-4 School Facilities 6 Table 4E-5 Lakes 6 Park System Needs Identification 7 Table 4E-6 Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification 7 Park, Open Space and Trail Goals and Policies 8 Park, Open Space and Trail Action Plan 11 Table 4E-7 Big Island Implementation 12 Table 4E-8 Golf Course Implementation 13 Table 4E-9 Trail Implementation 14 Appendix. A. Parks and Trails Map B. Lake Access map C. Park Details D. Lake Access Point Listing City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 1 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces INTRODUCTION The provision of parks, open space areas and trails in Orono is an essential quality of life element for the residents of the City. It is important for Orono to develop and implement a thoughtful strategy for meeting these needs in an efficient, economical manner. This Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practice of the City of Orono. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues many of the basic open space concepts established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's, the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and the 1980 Community Management Plan, the 2000-2020 CMP, and the 2010-2030 CMP. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. To identify the recreation and open space needs of the City and its citizens. 2. To be a management tool for City officials, appointed commissions, City staff, and other parties involved in developing, maintaining, and managing recreational programs and city owned facilities in Orono. 3. Serve as the recreation open space element of our community management plan, designed to address and conform to all the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan PARK CLASSIFICATION AND DEFINITIONS Orono residents are serviced by a variety of park, recreation, open space, and trail facilities provided by the City, regional and state government, the Orono School District, and private enterprise. In addition, the community benefits from facilities in nearby communities which are accessible to and used by Orono residents. Table 4E-1 Park Classification and Definitions' Component Use Service Area Size Site Attributes & Location Mini -park Specialized facilities that serve a Less than 1/4 < 1 acre May be publicly or privately owned and/or concentrated or limited mile radius incorporated into a development site, such as population or specific group apartment, such as tots or senior citizens. Neighborhood park/ Area for intense recreational /4 to %2 mile < 25 acres Physical geography suited for intense playground activities such as field games, radius to serve development. Proximity to elementary schools court games, crafts, apparatus a population of or residential neighborhoods. area, skating, and neighborhood 4,000 — 5,000 centers. (one neighborhood) Community Area for intense recreational 3 - 5 25-50 Physical geography suited for intense playfield facilities such as athletic fields neighborhoods acres development. Proximity to secondary schools and swimming pools; could or one and other public facilities. include a neighborhood use. community Community park Area of natural or ornamental 3 - 5 25- 100 Proximity to community facilities and quality for outdoor recreation neighborhoods acres resources. such as walking, viewing, or one sitting, picnicking; could have community some field and court 2ames. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 2 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Component Use Service Area Size Site Attributes & Location Conservancy lands Area of natural quality such as Municipality, Variable, Natural resources that merit preservation and that watercourses and wetlands that township, based on would be negatively affected by development. are preserved for environmental county or state extent of or aesthetic benefits to the resources. community and/or because of the negative environmental or economic effects of development in them. Local linear parks, Area developed for one or more A Contained On- or off-road trails that may or may not trail, corridors and varying modes of recreational neighborhood within one traverse scenic areas while assuring the trail parkways travel such as hiking, biking, or several city or treadway has no adverse effect on the natural snowmobiling, horseback riding, neighborhoods township. resource base. cross-country skiing, canoeing in a city or Width and and driving. township length minimums vary by locality. Lake access' These areas provide access to 3 - 5 <1 Acre Developed or undeveloped public right of way. lakes for activities such as neighborhoods swimming, boating, fishing, or one snowmobiling, walking skiing, community snowshoeing and winter vehicular lake access. County linear parks, Area developed for one or more Several cities Traverses On- or off-road trails that may or may not trail, corridors and varying modes of recreational and/or one or more traverse scenic areas while assuring the trail parkways travel such as hiking, biking, townships in a municipaliti treadway has no adverse effect on the natural snowmobiling, horseback riding, county es. Width resource base. cross-country skiing, canoeing and length and driving. minimums vary by county. Special recreation Area that preserves, Community Specific Appropriate to particular special recreation feature maintains, and provides standard feature. Sited where most advantageous for the specialized or single purpose applicable special recreation feature and the overall park activities to desired system. feature. Regional Facilities County park Area of natural or ornamental County 25-100 Affords natural features with varied physical quality for outdoor recreation acres geographic interest. Proximity to community such as walking, viewing, facilities and resources and/or where resource sitting, picnicking; could have occurs. some field and court games. Regional park Area of natural or ornamental 3 - 5 200 - 500 Complete natural setting contiguous to water quality for nature -oriented communities acres bodies or watercourses where possible. Where outdoor recreation such as natural resource occurs -particularly water. picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming, camping and trail uses. Regional park Area of natural quality for nature- County, multi- 1000+ acres Diversity of unique resources, such as reserve oriented outdoor recreation such county area topography, lakes, streams, marshes, flora, as viewing and studying nature, fauna. Where natural resource occurs. wildlife habitat, conservation, swimming, picnicking, hiking, boating, camping and trail uses. Regional Area developed for one or more The entire Sufficient When feasible, off-road trails that utilize human destination & varying modes of non -motorized metropolitan corridor made and/or natural linear resources such as linking trails recreational travel such as hiking, region width and utility corridors, railroad and highway rights of biking, horseback riding, cross- length to way, stream / river valleys, or at the edges of country skiing, and canoeing. accommoda forest or prairie. On -road trails are acceptable to trail. when off-road trails are not feasible. Preferably adjacent to high-quality natural areas. The trail treadway should be placed where it has no adverse impact on the natural resource base. When feasible, linking trails should attempt to connect to population, economic and social centers along its route. 'from Met council Parks Definitions 'City of Orono Definition City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 3 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces EXISTING PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL SYSTEM INVENTORY City of Orono Facilities The City of Orono maintains over 260 acres of parks, trails and open space. The table below summarizes the types of parks and facilities available throughout the city system. Appendix A contains a map of the City parks, trails and recreation system and Appendix C has detailed descriptions of each park. Table 4E-2 Cityof Orono Park Facilities u � O w R R � •E O O � bA i. C O Park Acres a C7 " i F Z a w A. Notes Mini Livingston Tower Park 0.2 X Neighborhood Roberta Lee Antoine Park 1.3 X Crystal Bay Park 2.3 X X X X X X Navarre Playground 1.1 X X X X Community playfields Bederwood Park 9.05 X X X X X X X Hackberry 3.58 X X X X X X Casco Point Ice Rink 3.1 X X Community Parks Casco Point Park 8.5 X X French Creek Preserve 33.9 X X X X Saga Hill Preserve 28.9 X X X Big Island Nature Park 56.5 X X X X X Lowry Woods 14.1 X X Highwood Park 13.6 X X X Seven Nations Park 3.0 X X Pleasant View Park 1.2 X Lake Accesses There are 50 lake access point below are those capable of support recreation activities. A comprehensive list is at Appendix C Casco Point Beach (36) 0.3 X Lydiard Beach 0.7 X X Sandy Beach 19) 0.28 X Summit Park Beach 4.5 X X X Browns Bay Molly's 0.04 corner (la) X X 0.02 Winter Vehicular Shoreline at Spates (2) North Shore Drive at 0.04 Winter Vehicular Baldur Park Road (4) Crystal Bay Road (6) 0.04 Boating and bathing deeds for select parcels Gibbs Landing - Fox St. 0.04 Pedestrian year- round, vehicles X winter only Eastlake Street (10) 0.04 Winter Vehicular X Bayside Rd. at Stubbs 0.04 Winter Bay Rd. (11) snowmobiles access, Fishing X x X Dock City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 4 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Westlake Street (14) 0.04 Agency Facility Acres in Orono Classification Three Rivers Morris T. Baker Regional Park Reserve 255 Regional Park Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge 62 X Noerenberg Memorial Gardens 73 Special Use Pedestrian Access Park Lane (15) 0.04 Dakota Rail Regional Trail 3 Regional Trail Hennepin County North Arm Landing 1.5 Lake Access MnDNR Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area 40 X Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area 220 Regional Park Fishing Dock Loma Linda Avenue (22) 0.04 Maxwell Bay Lake Access 3.5 Lake Access Nature Conservancy Ferndale Marsh 16 Regional Park Reserve Private Public Lakeview Legacy Park 4.5 X LMCD Lake Minnetonka 4700.0 Fishing Dock Corral Road Extension (34) 0.04 221.0 Lake X Pedestrian Access Ivy Lane (3 8) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Spring Street (39) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Carman Street (40) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Trails Ferndale Road 1.8 x Willow Drive 0.7 x CR 6 0.6 x Brown Road 0.7 x SlIecial Use Areas Orono Golf Course 45.6 X Golf , Winter Sledding and X- X X country Skiing Lurton Park 39 Off Leash Dog X X Park Regional Facilities There are numerous regional parks, trails and open space facilities within Orono's boundaries. Table 4E-3 Regional Facilities Agency Facility Acres in Orono Classification Three Rivers Morris T. Baker Regional Park Reserve 255 Regional Park Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge 62 Regional Park Reserve Noerenberg Memorial Gardens 73 Special Use Independence Trail 3 Regional Trail Dakota Rail Regional Trail 3 Regional Trail Hennepin County North Arm Landing 1.5 Lake Access MnDNR Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area 40 Regional Park Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area 220 Regional Park The Luce Line Trail 6 Regional Trail Maxwell Bay Lake Access 3.5 Lake Access Nature Conservancy Ferndale Marsh 16 Regional Park Reserve Private Public Lakeview Legacy Park 4.5 Community park LMCD Lake Minnetonka 4700.0 Lake Orono/Long Lake Long Lake 221.0 Lake School and Other Publicly Available Recreational Facilities Orono Schools The Orono School District campus on Old Crystal Bay Road North provides a wide range of facilities for school and community use, including tennis courts, football and soccer fields, baseball/softball, etc. Additionally, the school property is home to the Orono Ice City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 5 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Arena (developed by the Orono Hockey Boosters) and Lee Carlson Baseball Fields (developed by the Orono Baseball Association). Table 4E-4 School Facilities AWA Facility Acres in Orono Classification Orono School Campus fields 20 Community Playfields Orono Ice Arena 4 Special Use Lee Carlson Baseball Fields 8 Community Play Fields Private Parks Available to the General Public One of the most recent additions to the Orono community is the Lakeview Legacy Park. The park is 4.5 acres of privately owned publicly available park land. Lakes and Lake Access With more than 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline and nearly 5 miles of additional lake shorelines, Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. Lakes A defining characteristic of Orono is access to lake recreation opportunities. The two major lakes within the community are Lake Minnetonka which is managed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Long Lake which is shared between Long Lake and Orono. In addition to access that lake shore property owners enjoy the city maintains a number of lake access points. The DNR and Hennepin County each maintain boat landing public access points on Lake Minnetonka. Lake Access In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to 66' in width. The historic level of use of these right-of-ways (sometimes referred to as a fire lanes or lake access roads) ranges from minimal to year-round. Certain of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice -fishing accesses. Certain accesses are provided with docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography and experience a relatively low level of usage. Appendix B has a map of Lake Access Point and Appendix D contains a complete listing of lake access points. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 6 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK SYSTEM NEEDS IDENTIFICATION At the present time, there are many parks and open space facilities located in the City of Orono. These recreation and open space facilities are primarily under City, State, county and school District jurisdiction. Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification The table below depicts the amount of park, trails and open space within the boundaries of Orono by type. The National Recreation and Parks Association recommends a minimum of 9.6 acres per 1000 population of available park land. Orono is well above this standard with 34.3 Acres of parkland per 1000 with just city maintained facilities. Table 4E-6: Parks, Open Space and Trails Acreage by Classification (2018) Classification Acreage Acres per 1000 Mini -Parks 0.2 0.0 Neighborhood Parks 4.8 0.6 Community Playfields 12.6 1.6 Community Parks 160.0 20.6 Lake Access 6.4 0.8 Trails 3.9 0.5 Orono Special Use Areas 79.1 10.2 Other Orono Preserved Areas 0.0 City Subtotal 266.9 34.3 Regional Park 515 66.2 Regional Park Reserve 78 10.0 Special Use 77 9.9 Regional Trail 13 1.6 Lake Access 5 0.6 Community Play Fields 28 3.6 Community park 4.5 0.6 Regional, school and private public 720 92.5 Grand Total 986.9 126.8 Lakes 4921 632.1 Summary and Conclusions 2018 Citizen Park Survey To help inform this chapter the city conducted a parks, trails and open space survey. The results of the survey are available on the city website or by contacting the City Clerk. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 7 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is based upon the following goals and Policies, which in turn are consistent with the other elements of Orono's Land Use and Community Management Plans: Goals 1. To provide passive open space and active recreational opportunities to serve the needs and desires all residents. 2. To protect, preserve, restore and provide access to ecologically significant natural resource areas, wildlife habitats and open space. 3. To provide citywide bike and walking trails that provide connections between area parks, trails and open space and when possible function as a transportation corridors. 4. To identify, preserve and highlight areas of historical significance. 5. To maintain and increase access for all residents to the city's lake resources such as Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. 6. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens by developing fiscal and management policies that support maintenance, development and acquisition of parks and open spaces. Policies The city will maintain a Park Commission (see paragraph 6.A. for details) of appointed residents to continually assess and evaluate the current parks, trails and open spaces within Orono. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 2. The city will actively encourage civic involvement in developing and maintaining Orono's parks and open spaces through programs such as adopt a parks and park clean up days. (Supports goals 1, 2, 6) 3. The City will cooperate and actively work with public and private organizations to provide additional opportunities for recreation and open space that complement existing municipal, regional and private facilities. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 4. Orono will require land developers to provide for recreational space to serve all new developments. New developments that results in increased land use density will be required to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional parks, playgrounds, bike -hike trails and open space or will be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase, of such lands or improvement of existing recreation facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 6) 5. Orono will encourage the preservation and protection of natural recreational and open space amenities including lakes, marshland, wetlands, and natural woodlands on private lands though City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 8 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces open space through conservation easements, private donations, land trusts and other preservation methods that allow the private sector to play role in preservation of open spaces. (Supports goals 2, 6) 6. Orono will coordinate with other jurisdictions, agencies and non-profit organizations in the provision of sufficient active recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of the community. Orono will actively encourage all school districts to coordinate their programs and facilities and to open them to the public whenever feasible. Orono will actively support and cooperate with the Orono and Mound-Westonka School Districts in their community service recreation programs. The City will encourage planning for organized team sports on a community/sub-regional basis. Orono will work with public or non-profit groups to fund the acquisition and development of recreational and open space lands and facilities. (Supports Goals 1, 4, 5) 7. Orono will strive toward connectivity between the various park and open space facilities. The interrelationships between neighborhood parks, conservation areas and the rest of the park system should be strengthened through the proper location and use of green ways, trails, underpasses and overpasses. Trail connections should be provided to neighborhood parks to enable pedestrian access. Trail corridors / easements will be incorporated at the edge of subdivisions and adjacent to major roadways. (Supports goal 3) 8. Orono will acquire additional public open space parcels as opportunities arise. The priority for any acquisitions will be for ecologically significant lands that abut existing park land, land that provides improved access to existing parkland and trails or land that facilitates the development of the planned trail system. (Supports goals 2, 5, 6) 9. The City's park dedication fund will be used for purchase of additional park land and/or for improvement of existing park land. Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, this fund will not be used for park maintenance or recreation operating expense. (Supports goal 6) 10. Where possible, recreational facilities will be designed to be barrier -free so that handicapped citizens have reasonable access to facilities. Orono will ensure that select new parks are constructed with accessibility in mind and to incorporate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards with projects to upgrade existing parks. (Supports goals 1, 3, 5) 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City's intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end, the City will follow these policies: ■ Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right-of-ways will be denied in all cases except where equal or better lake access will be granted nearby in return. ■ The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. ■ The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 9 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces 12. The city will conduct a periodic (10 year cycle) park usage and needs community wide survey to determine if residents' needs are being met. (Supports goal 1) 13. The city will review the existing park and facilities conditions to identify needed maintenance upgrades and replacements. 14. The city will provide sufficient funding for the administration and maintenance of the existing parks, trials and open space system as part of the regular City budget levy. Other sources of park funding such as development park fees, grants, support from local organizations, private donations, will be used for acquisitions, capital improvements and major renovations. (Supports goal 6) City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 10 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK, OPEN SPA CE AND TRAIL A CTION PLAN The following paragraphs describe how Orono intends to act on the goals and policies of the previous section. Park Commission The Orono Park Commission serves as an advisory body appointed by the City Council to make recommendations about park, open space and trail issues. The Park Commission's mandate as set forth in Municipal Code Section 2.52 is to study and consider the continuing needs of the City for parks and recreation areas- and facilities of all kinds, including, but not limited to, problems involving public use of Lake Minnetonka and other lakes in the City, and portions of its shorelines, The Park Commissions role in park planning is to continuously evaluate park, open space and trail facilities and community needs. This ongoing evaluation process allows for identification and prioritization of improvements; taking into account such factors as population growth, demographic changes, levels of facility use, health and safety factors, condition of facilities, special populations, adjacent land use compatibility, and life cycle recreation; invasive species removal and satisfaction of community needs. The Park Commission will monitor the parks, open space and trail systems to satisfactorily address the goals and policies of this plan. Focus Parks and Trails City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 11 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Big island In order to achieve the level of management needed to operate Big Island Park successfully, the City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed district created and adopted the Big Island Nature Park Management Plan, November, 2011. The management plan contains a vision and a series of goals for the park. The specific bullet points require additional clarification and coordination with the Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan for Orono 2040 will be a three-phase process as outlined below: Table 4E-7. Big Island Implementation Phase L 1 This Phase will,focus on the making the park sae and accessible. • Clean up existing trails so they are passable for hiking. • Purchase and place a safe container for mowing and trail maintenance equipment. • Mow and maintain trails. • Establish controls for unauthorized use (snowmobiles) • Renovate existing structure (visitor center) • Evaluate Historical value • Create a plan to improve security. Phase II I This Phase willfocus on completing Goals in 2030 Comp Plan. • Establish a master plan for day use facilities, including but not limited to: bathrooms, shelter, viewing platform, picnic tables, historical marker, accessible paths, and a veteran's memorial flag. • Clarify the Natural and Recreational Areas in the conservation easement. • Re-evaluate the Management Plan together with the MCWD and make revisions as needed. • Construct day use facilities • Provide access for those who are physically disabled. • Conduct a process involving all possible stakeholders to create a long-term Vision. • Establish a true Vision for the Orono Big Island Park (what should it look like in the year 2040?) Phase III I This Phase willfocus on the long-term potential of the park. • Create the partnerships required to implement the plan (MCWD, LMCD, surrounding cities, state of MN, Veterans groups, Three Rivers Park District, etc) • Create a phased approach to the vision (masterplan) • Seek and obtain funding. • Implement the plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 12 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Golf Course The city will look to secure the long term viability of the Municipal Golf course through a series of capital improvements focusing on both golf and alternative recreational activities on the site. In 2017 the city under took the development of a mini -master plan to lay out options for the park. Future projects may include: Table 4E-8 Golf Course Implementation Priority Project Description 1 Porch/ Patio Includes porch for clubhouse 2 Cart Parking Run concurrent with Porch project as the porch project eliminates current cart parking. Includes retaining wall and pavement for cart parking. 3 Fest Tent Area Leveling and clearing a 40'x60' area for placement of a fest tent to facilitate more events at the golf course 4 Fire Pit Natural gas fire pit area. 5 Lawn Bowling Project pending further analysis. Installation of a 30'x 120'2 lane lawn bowling facility 6 Snow Tubing Hill w/Tow Project pending further analysis. Installation of a tow rope and Rope procurement of snow tubes. 7 Multi -Use Trail Project pending further analysis. Installation of a perimeter multiuse trail at the golf course. Annual Focus Parks In addition to specific City initiatives or activities supporting Big Island and the Orono Golf Course, the Park Commission will designate one or two of its Parks each year for special consideration as "Focus Parks". In addition to normal maintenance activities, Focus Parks (neighborhood or community, recreational or natural) will be evaluated from a broader perspective, including potential capital investment. Examples for consideration could be: ■ Are there additional opportunities to increase use of the park (e.g. new trails or recreational facilities)? ■ Are special ecological or historical features of the park effectively featured? ■ Could the park benefit from more extensive removal of invasive species? ■ Are directional signs to the park and within the park adequate? ■ Are parking facilities appropriate for existing and proposed uses for the park? When designating a Focus Park, the Commission will also seek input from surrounding residents who could be impacted by changes in park use or investment. Recent examples of Focus Park designation included the conversion of the Susan E. Lurton Nature Area to include an off -leash dog park (2016-2017), extensive removal of invasive species, trail widening, new signage and benches at Saga Hill Nature Area (2017-2018), and potential new uses and improvements at Bederwood Community Park (2018-2019). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 13 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Trails Table 4E-9: Trail Im lementation Priority Project Description 1 County Road The city does not support the planned on -street trail on County Road 15 due to 15 West of its close proximity to Dakota trail. Navarre 2 Navarre The city will actively partner with Hennepin county and Three Rivers park Dakota Trail District to complete a trail connection along County Road 19 Connecting Connection Navarre to the Dakota Trail 3 Old Crystal The city will plan an off-street trail that provides access from the Luce Line Trail Bay Road at Old Crystal Bay Road to the Dakota Trail at North Shore Drive. 4 Wayzata Blvd The City is partnering with the city of Long Lake and Hennepin County to Trail provide a multi modal trail along the north side of Wayzata Blvd from the Luce Line trial to the western Boundary of the Orono School Property. The trail is being included as part of the CSAH 112 Turn back Projects. 5 Lakeview The city will plan a trail that connects Lakeview Legacy Park to the County Legacy Park Road 19 trail as well as trails to the south that connect with the Dakota trail. 6 Hunter The city will partner with the Hennepin County to connect the trails in northeast Drive/Ferndale Orono to the Luce Line and Dakota Trails via Hunter Drive and Ferndale Road. 7 Lowry Woods The city will plan trail access to the Lowry Woods Park. 8 Old Long Lake The city does not support the addition of an off-street trail along Old Long Lake Road Road due to the nearby access to the Luce Line Trail in several locations. RESOURCING Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's parks, trails and open space system. The majority of the resourcing will come from the General Fund Levy. The golf course and Lurton off Leash Park have separate funding sources for maintenance. The golf course is funded through greens fees and the off leash dog park through a combination the Lurton Park Fund and annual permit fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures at parks as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City's goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements As Orono becomes fully developed over the next two decades, the amount of money collected via new development park dedication fees will decrease substantially. Funding for the acquisition of park lands and for improvement of existing facilities will require alternative sources of capital in the future. The City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding and will continue City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 14 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintain the level of active and passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. Orono currently provides funding for park, open space and trail acquisitions and improvements by the following methods: Mandatory developer contributions of land or cash payments to the Park Dedication Fund at the time property is subdivided or developed; transfers from the City's general fund; private contributions of land or funds; fees for use; and grants. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 15 2040 Comprehensive Plan v ; Orono, MN Parks and Trails � & E BOLTON K February 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. I k� a ` Moon �' Troy Legend e _ .._.... ...._ .,. _.__._. w..._ .w.�.w ...._...._._ .. _ .. _ . . _ .. - - - .. _ .. _ .. _ .. - . — R ..� , ' 'I Z E 2 '- ,r' 3 Dicke ~ 6th Ave N�°aJ ' 1 e i° Lake Lake'o pve N • Classen W SpL diard z i cor a Y ° o Long Lake � Source: Met. Council, City of Orono,°aa sate JPO m """' . ` L`ake �, d Hennepin County, MnDOT 1 GJOe� wnR° m 12 Daniels St LL '' t o ( 8th Ave N �0 `� ��a d0 M N - Orchard�n Wayzata @yL N Moline Road ;U m �� Grand Ave o c °�l)� ' . Ua i y / _ 3rd Av Fp—arks and Trails Regional Trails Other Trails Figure 4E-2 R°aa J oy9° • 12 rn 1 Stubbs - cc Bay 3 Fox St' �.._ c°i Ln . North Browns F' anager Bay ■ Arm Maxwell Lake Bay t ■m Forest D Marsh Lake o ®� • N Shore. Dr o<e • . • �,c Smith Bracketts Point West o �• Arm Crystal Bohn:; �•' Bay Point • c• I L ! 1 U ■ 5� 1 Lafayette 1 •■•■I�---_-===5. Bay �' 1 y i 40 a Sp. O� •.,� �' 010 .. �A Pai 'nal / 1 � •, � ••`�•♦ gyp/ c in Viewer asci )irot I �. 1 AveN 1' I IN. Tu Dr Blvd Lake Access Points Orono, MN z --I ruru C Moline Road 0 151 M la 0 C 0 0 Katrina \ Lake 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1♦ 1. 12 1 13.i*- ��7 fo X 0 N /Q � Lake Ciassen z a 0 IX M m 4 Alb 14 Stubbs Bay A Branch Road O^ North �_. Arm �a _ 'P23 22� o 27 a \A Forest 24 284 3 Lake 21 Jenning's 1 J 25 20 Bay 1 29 A 26 19 1 0 �♦, 31 33 1. ** A 18 Apr 1 Wes! 32 34 O ./ Bf0' d'�o 1 Arm vd� m 1 o _ 1 35 Harri, oor L� 5 Bay ! 1 ♦ t � 1 ♦eti��tr Edgewat .. yo�y�o90 Road Ave W Arm Dr therl- Legend e Lake Access Points Lakes & Ponds 11111111 11 +tl City Limits Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT, MnDNR W d J D a Kelley P'y m 12 Dan w � 1 0 C O hills.m I Long Lake 1' 1 Olp.�o t o ,94Lake ,e V M 11111 « c 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111�ra 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 zethq�@ Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment ofshomline 7 is Shoreline Drive - "Molly's Comer' 2-S 9- t . Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and tmshcans at this wide spot along 1q N Shoreline Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible Ot Smith Bay (Lower Lake) Dicke? 2 Shrelin, Dive at Spares 10-SAdj to 1955 WinnerOnly Browns 1 ) ¢oa/d 01 Lake XOM ager Bay North Sh Drive at Shoreline a Kelley P'y m 12 Dan w � 1 0 C O hills.m I Long Lake 1' 1 Olp.�o t o ,94Lake ,e -�� Bay ,♦ % A H � F ♦ od lk ♦ G ® ♦♦ 3o Ro; 37 ,, 3 1� V A A CiasC 0 d � Porn 1 �tou o January 2018 nnIInn B O LTO N ,1 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. V roll at « c 1 End of Orono Lane 2-5 1355/1385No public access Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment ofshomline 7 is Shoreline Drive - "Molly's Comer' 2-S 9- o Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and tmshcans at this wide spot along 1q 1y Shoreline Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible Ot Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2 Shrelin, Dive at Spares 10-SAdj to 1955 WinnerOnly Browns 1 ) _ ager Bay North Sh Drive at Shoreline Maxwell --N e 3 Drive Bay French a} Crystal Bay I Marsh Lydiard North Shore Drive at Baldur Park 4 Road 8-S 1 Winter Only 30'w i& planed road tight-nf-way Lake 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr I7 -N 1998/2000 Drainage way 15" wide platted alley- closely abutting homes on either, side 2 Adj to 2264 Pedestrian 66' wide platted mad extending to lakeshore; City also owns 4 adjacent tiny Lakeshore parcels t 3 l7 -S Sbadywood 1 I N Shore or 1 Crystal Bay Road (Relocated Smith Bracket 1 7 extension of Bayview Place in plat 17-S Bay Pedestrian Point 1 of"'W,11ace's Addition. ") � Access Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20' stip is "heremfore taken for street purposes" 00 1 Crystal Bohn:, ♦� ��, and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the Diarist Conn. C 1 Bay Point I • to 25' wide platted roadway; contains mumcipal sewer lines, potential access from neighborhood 1 17-S 3339/3345 • and Railroadlfrail corridor to lakeshore Lake 1 MinnetunKa 1 1 Arcolav� Pedestrian year- Tax records show access as Outlet A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, 1 8 4-S Adj to 3125 owrm vehicles Ci tains access ty m 1 5 7 Of,. este Rona 1 l wiv[a at, ; Lafayette Iq me s, ... ► Bay 00 9�e Ro j ♦ ehaha ♦ 4♦ 10; V ♦I ay ♦Minn , 11101,♦♦ C Carman' 41 DAE -�� Bay ,♦ % A H � F ♦ od lk ♦ G ® ♦♦ 3o Ro; 37 ,, 3 1� V A A CiasC 0 d � Porn 1 �tou o January 2018 nnIInn B O LTO N ,1 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. jRoadW rk, Stubbs Bay 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 I1 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33 platted road ("Oak Street" m plat mi "Bay View Park") Also wed fm winter access by wmobilesoff Luce Lm c Two 60'planed roads and eve 65'platted road to the Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Smears in Across from.yxid set St. in I t fOn.,illc on Lake Minetonka). These 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Nopulic accessplat oFB y V Paz; d Th p a o 3700, 3750 Bayside potents 1 p int. a t p ned for public use13 Byide Rd. 5-N Westsideof3775 p30realigned platted road (Religned "Lake Street"in theplatofOttovilleonLakeMinnetonka Ba side See sheet file 3775Nofr bliuse. 14 Westlke Street 5-N 372/389 Pedestrian 30' tatted road ri hnof--wet tendin to lakeshore; walkin IAccessp g y ex g g access on y. North Arm Bay 60 wide planed road, paved to shoreline usble for boat launch bur there is no parking IS Park Lave 6-S 607/649 FishmgD k ailable 16Oak Street 6-S Ad1 m 4119 Dminag y 30Wide platted road, vet develoed, steep slopes and mvme hmrt useA ipso from l7 B Id Park R d 8-S WiterA NW ridof platteddevelopedroadasnextendstoshorelt 1384/1392O k PI ml trod road to plat of 3768/3818Nah Shore 40 ide planed undeveloped road extending fi'om North Sh D across platted Cherry Av18"Cry n 16 y V_ew" 8_g Dr No pabh {eline mostly walencl or under water, Encroached l y h d d ivewa) S dy Beach(Externin of Maple. 3898/3908Cherry l9 P1ae) B -S Ave SwtmmmgBeach60 de platted roadway used for Cuybeach 20 Grnvt Street 8-S 1310 Spmce/1330 Drainage way 50' wide platted road, undeveloped Che PI 21 Spmce Place 8-S 1250/1260 No public access 40' Wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped, Encroached 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40'wide phnIod road; also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 Pedestrian 60' wide platted road righ4of-way, ,access not developed, walking use only. Encroachments Access present 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 Drainage way 20' wide platted mad/alley undeveloped right -of --way leading to shoreline "Summit Avenue" (Extension of Dramas way 25 7-5 1067/110/ 50' wide platted road undeveloped fight -of -way to shoreline, drainage way F,].—.d Avenue; utilities 26 "Buff Street' 7-S W est side T 1453 Drainage way 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not developed, drainage way Park Or West Arm Bay North Shore Drive west end 33' platted right-,fconio dor extensn of Co. Rd. 19 plus tax -forfeited Lo[ 10, Block 6, 27 7-S "4795" Shoreline Drainage way "Bergquist and Wickland'. Park....'; undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due (adjacent to Orono/M'triata horde) to very, steep slopes North Shore Drive at "Adams 40' planed roan right-of-way extev,lov Ln plat of "Bergq,i,t and Wickland', Park—" 28 7-S 4731/4745 Drainageway slreef' Exmn,ipn nnaevem a ve ,tee naafi ter amino c 29 Rest P Pedestrian tit Lane 7-5 1340/1345 33' platted right-of-way comfier, pavement does not extend to lake Access 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/14/0 Pedestrian 16platted road right of -way widens to about 40 at shorelme, paved but no boat launching Access —it"' 31 O hard Beach Place 7-1 West of 1530 Pedestrian 50' platted road right -mf -way extend, to shoreline, tree growth and topography limit, vehicular Acne., ecce,. 32 Highwood Lane Extensi4156/4167 Highwoodon 7-S Rd Drainage way 20' platted alley right-,fway to shoreline; steep slope to shoreline, uMeveloped 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 Drainage way 20' platted alley right -of --way, to shoreline, not developed r Drainage way P y mainly nage g access 34 Conal Road Extension 17-N 17ft5/1825 Concordia pe es 20' Iatted aIle 1 for disc but also walking a tion annexa Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat of "Fagemess"; fine registrations by mos 35 Fagemess Point Accretions 18-N Across koro 1965/1985 No public access abutting owners have resulted iv dedicated right -o8 -way no longerabulting sh... law; it appears a Fagemess N Rd that Cher is ubbr access reins Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/287091Ca. 7Pt Swimtviv Beach 60' wide lattedroad Carman Sf used m a Ci v beach g P (" City ewimmi g Q37 Casco Circle � 3195/ 3205 Drainage way 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline a[ the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 Drainage way 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place -steep, used for drainage 39 "Spring Strea" 20-S 2600/261 Was- Point Pedestrian 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side ofplat Rd Access of"Kastar Cove"--develo ed walkingaccess onl ,,.4e 40 Cannan Street 20-S —C— 3555 Fishing dock 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock Frederick p°41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Rd Swimming Beach 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, used w a City swimming beach yJ� Big Island 00 A N. End of "Lawn Avenue" 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Island Park B E. end of "Tocisit Avenue" 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Island Park -slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established ad drivable a a road for emergency &service vehicle access ° D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+/- d planed road y between Lois 21 d 54, Mo Island Park or 20' wnd E `7vleadow Lane East Extended' Z3 -S 280290 drffieull planed away between Lots 59 d 60, Morse Island Park -steep slope makes use , F "Meta Comet A— Somh" 23-S 340 33' wide planed roadway between Lot F Memse, Island Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Pmk 2"a Addition 41 ;i G "Massasoit Avenue West Bnd" 23-5 440/450 33' wide platted roadway between Lot L Morse Island Park and Lot 1, Seri— subdivision of r Lot E Morse Island Park -steep slope H "Meadow Lane Alley" 23-S 450/460 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles 1 "Pleasant View Street" 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Lake Mimetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe « c 1 End of Orono Lane 2-5 1355/1385No public access Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment ofshomline 7 is Shoreline Drive - "Molly's Comer' 2-S Across from 1410 Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and tmshcans at this wide spot along (Oudot A, Dragonfly Hill) Shoreline Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2 Shrelin, Dive at Spares 10-SAdj to 1955 WinnerOnly G t d t vehicular allowed. A f 2016 privately owned with city _ at for Ik d tryb k pg t North Sh Drive at Shoreline T - t. S&U RLS 192: th t I v th t p I p adjacent to Shoreline Drive, due to 3 Drive 10-5 No public slope a d , r ty'a is this ass point is not open for public use Crystal Bay Lydiard North Shore Drive at Baldur Park 4 Road 8-S 498/35In Winter Only 30'w i& planed road tight-nf-way Lake 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr I7 -N 1998/2000 Drainage way 15" wide platted alley- closely abutting homes on either, side Adj to 2264 Pedestrian 66' wide platted mad extending to lakeshore; City also owns 4 adjacent tiny Lakeshore parcels t b Crystal Bay Road (West end) l7 -S Sbadywood Access / Bathing the east for sm additio..I 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for "boating and bathing". Crystal Bay Road (Relocated 20'relocaled alley from Railroad property to shoreline; potential lake access from milway 7 extension of Bayview Place in plat 17-S 3405/3415 Pedestrian corridor. The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed filed Nov. 10, 1908 from of"'W,11ace's Addition. ") Access Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20' stip is "heremfore taken for street purposes" 00 and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the Diarist Conn. C Crystal Bey Road (Platted extension 1 25' wide platted roadway; contains mumcipal sewer lines, potential access from neighborhood 8 of Hillside Place` 17-S 3339/3345 Utilities and Railroadlfrail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay Pedestrian year- Tax records show access as Outlet A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, 9 Gibbs Landing -Fox St 4-S Adj to 3125 owrm vehicles Ci tains access ty m l wiv[a at, jRoadW rk, Stubbs Bay 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 I1 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33 platted road ("Oak Street" m plat mi "Bay View Park") Also wed fm winter access by wmobilesoff Luce Lm c Two 60'planed roads and eve 65'platted road to the Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Smears in Across from.yxid set St. in I t fOn.,illc on Lake Minetonka). These 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Nopulic accessplat oFB y V Paz; d Th p a o 3700, 3750 Bayside potents 1 p int. a t p ned for public use13 Byide Rd. 5-N Westsideof3775 p30realigned platted road (Religned "Lake Street"in theplatofOttovilleonLakeMinnetonka Ba side See sheet file 3775Nofr bliuse. 14 Westlke Street 5-N 372/389 Pedestrian 30' tatted road ri hnof--wet tendin to lakeshore; walkin IAccessp g y ex g g access on y. North Arm Bay 60 wide planed road, paved to shoreline usble for boat launch bur there is no parking IS Park Lave 6-S 607/649 FishmgD k ailable 16Oak Street 6-S Ad1 m 4119 Dminag y 30Wide platted road, vet develoed, steep slopes and mvme hmrt useA ipso from l7 B Id Park R d 8-S WiterA NW ridof platteddevelopedroadasnextendstoshorelt 1384/1392O k PI ml trod road to plat of 3768/3818Nah Shore 40 ide planed undeveloped road extending fi'om North Sh D across platted Cherry Av18"Cry n 16 y V_ew" 8_g Dr No pabh {eline mostly walencl or under water, Encroached l y h d d ivewa) S dy Beach(Externin of Maple. 3898/3908Cherry l9 P1ae) B -S Ave SwtmmmgBeach60 de platted roadway used for Cuybeach 20 Grnvt Street 8-S 1310 Spmce/1330 Drainage way 50' wide platted road, undeveloped Che PI 21 Spmce Place 8-S 1250/1260 No public access 40' Wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped, Encroached 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40'wide phnIod road; also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 Pedestrian 60' wide platted road righ4of-way, ,access not developed, walking use only. Encroachments Access present 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 Drainage way 20' wide platted mad/alley undeveloped right -of --way leading to shoreline "Summit Avenue" (Extension of Dramas way 25 7-5 1067/110/ 50' wide platted road undeveloped fight -of -way to shoreline, drainage way F,].—.d Avenue; utilities 26 "Buff Street' 7-S W est side T 1453 Drainage way 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not developed, drainage way Park Or West Arm Bay North Shore Drive west end 33' platted right-,fconio dor extensn of Co. Rd. 19 plus tax -forfeited Lo[ 10, Block 6, 27 7-S "4795" Shoreline Drainage way "Bergquist and Wickland'. Park....'; undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due (adjacent to Orono/M'triata horde) to very, steep slopes North Shore Drive at "Adams 40' planed roan right-of-way extev,lov Ln plat of "Bergq,i,t and Wickland', Park—" 28 7-S 4731/4745 Drainageway slreef' Exmn,ipn nnaevem a ve ,tee naafi ter amino c 29 Rest P Pedestrian tit Lane 7-5 1340/1345 33' platted right-of-way comfier, pavement does not extend to lake Access 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/14/0 Pedestrian 16platted road right of -way widens to about 40 at shorelme, paved but no boat launching Access —it"' 31 O hard Beach Place 7-1 West of 1530 Pedestrian 50' platted road right -mf -way extend, to shoreline, tree growth and topography limit, vehicular Acne., ecce,. 32 Highwood Lane Extensi4156/4167 Highwoodon 7-S Rd Drainage way 20' platted alley right-,fway to shoreline; steep slope to shoreline, uMeveloped 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 Drainage way 20' platted alley right -of --way, to shoreline, not developed r Drainage way P y mainly nage g access 34 Conal Road Extension 17-N 17ft5/1825 Concordia pe es 20' Iatted aIle 1 for disc but also walking a tion annexa Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat of "Fagemess"; fine registrations by mos 35 Fagemess Point Accretions 18-N Across koro 1965/1985 No public access abutting owners have resulted iv dedicated right -o8 -way no longerabulting sh... law; it appears a Fagemess N Rd that Cher is ubbr access reins Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/287091Ca. 7Pt Swimtviv Beach 60' wide lattedroad Carman Sf used m a Ci v beach g P (" City ewimmi g Q37 Casco Circle � 3195/ 3205 Drainage way 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline a[ the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 Drainage way 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place -steep, used for drainage 39 "Spring Strea" 20-S 2600/261 Was- Point Pedestrian 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side ofplat Rd Access of"Kastar Cove"--develo ed walkingaccess onl ,,.4e 40 Cannan Street 20-S —C— 3555 Fishing dock 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock Frederick p°41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Rd Swimming Beach 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, used w a City swimming beach yJ� Big Island 00 A N. End of "Lawn Avenue" 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Island Park B E. end of "Tocisit Avenue" 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Island Park -slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established ad drivable a a road for emergency &service vehicle access ° D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+/- d planed road y between Lois 21 d 54, Mo Island Park or 20' wnd E `7vleadow Lane East Extended' Z3 -S 280290 drffieull planed away between Lots 59 d 60, Morse Island Park -steep slope makes use , F "Meta Comet A— Somh" 23-S 340 33' wide planed roadway between Lot F Memse, Island Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Pmk 2"a Addition 41 ;i G "Massasoit Avenue West Bnd" 23-5 440/450 33' wide platted roadway between Lot L Morse Island Park and Lot 1, Seri— subdivision of r Lot E Morse Island Park -steep slope H "Meadow Lane Alley" 23-S 450/460 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles 1 "Pleasant View Street" 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Lake Mimetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe Appendix A: Park Histories and Details. Park Name: Antoine Park Classification: Neighborhood Park`' 4y Location: 1780 Concordia Street Size (in acres): 1.3 1 Description: Mainly open parkland with some large • u deciduous trees."; " t Facilities: Playground Sign+ ; Picnic Tables Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential J y Restrictions or Park sign must read "Roberta Lee Antoine Conditions: Playground" in the name of the donor. History / Notes: The property was donated to the city in 1974 by Roberta Lee Antoine. Until 1995 a recreational ice skating rink was maintained at the park. The abandoned buildings on the property were previously used to store the city's docks during the winter. Some winters and for the annual neighborhood picnic, area residents use one of the buildings as shelter. The Park Commission on January 6, 1997 recommended installation of new playground equipment. The Commission also requested that the City evaluate the existing buildings for a possible use as a picnic shelter, warming house or for their removal. The buildings were removed. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 22 0026 1.30 Donation in 1974 from Mary Antoine Park Name: Bederwood Classification: Community Playfield Location: 55 Stubbs Bay Road Size (in acres): 9.05 Description: Mainly open parkland with a scattering of smaller trees throughout the terrain while older deciduous trees surround the park along its borders, a Little League baseball field is located nearly in the center of the park; park is located near a small residential neighborhood Facilities: Baseball field Playground Benches Picnic tables Temporary chemical toilet facilities Gravel parking for park & Trail (approximately 25 to 30 vehicles) Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential / Luce Line State Trail Special use Groups/ Orono Baseball Association, trail users. Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: A 4" well has been constructed to provide drinking water and for flooding the ice skating rink. Improvements and equipment were funded through CDBG (community development block grant) funds and park dedication. A soccer field was proposed in the original plans for the park that was to be located in the north part of the parcel. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 05-117-23 210001 8.75 City purchased in 1974 05-117-23 21 008 TF 0.30 1979 Transfer from DNR to City Park Name: Casco Point Beach 1 y. u ►, ' ''" Al Classification: Public Lake Access/Beach Location: Off Casco Point Rd. on Carmen Rd Size (in acres) 0.3 Description: Narrow strip of land that was originally a street used as a water access point to fill fire trucks with water. Park is situated between two residential lake shore properties. Facilities: Bike rack 1" Picnic Table • f Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential .y 1 y �• "�'' Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Neighborhood residents Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: Casco Point Beach is a narrow strip of land 60 feet wide and 235 feet long between 2871 and 2879 Casco Point Road on Spring Park Bay. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.3 Dedicated right-of-way ("Carman Ave.") in the plat of `Spring Park' (1881) Park Name: Casco Point Ice Rink Classification: Special Use Area Location: On Casco Point Rd. before Dunwoody Ave. and one block south of Shoreline Dr. Size in acres): 3.14 Description: The majority of the land is now open space which abuts an adjoining wetland area, an �! open area used as an ice rink occupies the # A front of the park. The park is heavily wooded in the rear. _ Facilities: Ice Rink Parkin Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential 4 Special use Groups/ P p Stakeholders: - + Restrictions or None Conditions: ' F ,N' P Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 20-117-23 210022 3.00 Purchased by City in 1966 Park Name: Casco Point Park ►. Classification: Community Park + Location: Casco Point Circle Size (in acres): 8.25 Description: Heavily wooded lot with several meadows and gradually sloping terrain located at the tip,`."� r of Casco Point, park has one low lying area ` that acts as a catch basin; passive conservation area "< Facilities: Sign Mowed Areas a i Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential`" Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Restrictions or The deed to the property, dated December Conditions: 30, 1971, specifies that the conveyed �.•.:, premises shall be maintained as an open space natural woodland, that no buildings may be constructed, no recreational facilities _ inconsistent with the retention and preservation of the land, and no construction of a parking lot, washroom facility and/or other permanent structures. Notes: Casco Point Park is an 8 acre park at the end of Casco Point Road. It is left in its natural state and only mowed 3-4 times per year. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 20-117-23 43 0031 8.50 Quit -claim deeded to City in 1971 by Casco Point residents Park Name: Crystal Bay Park Classification: Neighborhood Park qi Location: 1335 Brown Road South w�. ' IE Size (in acres): 2.39 Description: Flat terrain with a division in park space, between the playground area and the open space by a row of tall evergreens. The park shares ., a parking lot with the Crystal Bay Post Office. .. r' Facilities: Playground Park benches Picnic tables ` Park identification sign -� Well Small Basket Ball Court _ +� t� l f 1 1 Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential M` l Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders • Restrictions or None Conditions: ; Notes: This playground was developed using park dedication and CDBG�N► funds. The portion of the park area north of the Post Office was .j 1 converted into a park by the City when they demolished the old city administrative and public works buildings in 1993. Open space on 4 the north side of the park may at some time in the future be developed " -., ,• into an ice rink - PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 10-117-23 31 0024 0.17 Orig. Village Hall site, acquired 1906 10-117-23 310025 0.16 Purchased 1920 10-117-23 310026 0.15 Purchased 1944 10-117-23 310027 0.14 Purchased 1944 10-117-23 31 0097 0.90 Purchased 1958-67 (4 parcels total) 10-117-23 31 0101 0.87 Purchased 1974-1980 (3 lots) Park Name: Livingston Tower Park Classification: Mini -park R ' Location: Corner of Livingston and Blaine streets IU Size in acres): 0.2 Description: Very small parcel with pine trees and three benches g � Facilities: Picnic Tables Benches Bike Rack Historical/Information Signs' Paver Patio Flower Gardens Adjacent Land Use: Single and multi -family residential. Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: Sculpted bird bath was constructed with funds from Westonka Lions and park dedication ftmds for the city by a local artist. Park was rehabilitated in 2015. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 34 0048 0.20 Dedicated as `Park Outlot' in plat of `Navarro' (1982) Park Name: Seven Nations Natural Area Classification: Community Park ; .y Location: Watertown Rd • 4' Size in acres): 3.04 Description: Truncated piece of property that has slightly = - rolling terrain located within the �" T Thoroughbred subdivision Facilities: Parking -t Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential r Special use Groups/ There have been claims of a connection of Stakeholders: the land with Native American groups. Restrictions or None Conditions: V i.F.n . Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 04-117-23 12 0020 3.04 Acquired in 1994 via Park Dedication from development of Old Crystal Bay Road Addition Park Name: I French Creek Preserve Park Name: I Hackberry Park i Classification: Community Park Location: 898 Old Crystal Bay Road South Size (in acres): 33.9 Description: About 7 acres of the dedicated portion are wetland wildlife and about 4 acres are prairie land preserve. The 7 acres open pond (which 20 years ago was once a sewer pond) is from 1.5 feet to 4 feet in depth and is surrounded by wetlands on the east and south. The NW corner of the 4 acres is a restored prairie which rises up slightly from the pond. Facilities: Gravel parking for approximately 8 to 10 Vehicles Benches Restored prairie Trails Park identification sign Information signs Adjacent Land Use: Mostly open space, some single family residences Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: =.L4_ Restrictions or None Conditions: how many acres the preserve actually holds, the city dedicated the Notes: There has been some discrepancy on determining northern portion of the property as parkland, which has been noted in records as being approximately 11 acres. Another portion of the preserve which fell into tax forfeiture makes up approximately 19 more acres; the whole property of Outlot A has been estimated around 30 acres. The park opened in the Fall of 1994. The City has set aside the NW 4 acres. The City transferred $90,000.00 from the City's park dedication account to the general fund for the purchase of this land. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 09-117-23 110007 32.7 Acquired for sewer plant (1963) 09-117-23 12 0009 1.15 Park dedication as part of plat of French Creek Woods (1995) Park Name: I Hackberry Park Classification: Community Playfields 4 FNPAI f fb� LA r -. Location: 126 Hackberry Hill Size (in acres): 3.58 Description: Terraced terrain, upper west side has play equipment and ice rink, lower east contains two ballfields. A residential house is situated in the middle half of the western portion. Facilities: Playground Half size basketball court 2 T -ball fields F Soccer field" - Picnic tables 5 Chemical toilets y� Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential Special use Groups/ Orono Baseball Association Stakeholders: % Restrictions or None" Conditions: - Notes: This park was developed with the assistance of the Minnetonka Optimists Club, Community Development Block Grant Funds and Park Dedication Funds. The City Purchased the residential property at 140 Hackberry Hill with living mortgage in 2016. The ice rink stopped being maintained in 2016 due to lake of use. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 33-118-23 44 0003 0.51 City purchased in 1971 33-118-23 44 0004 0.52 City purchased in 1971 33-118-23 44 0006 0.53 City purchased in 1967 33-118-23 44 0007 0.41 City purchased in 1967 33-118-23 44 0034 1.61 Dedicated as Park in plat of `Daniels Long Lake Heights" (1950) Park Name: Highwood Park Classification: Community park Location: North of North Shore Dr. Size (in acres): 13.69 Description: Nature trail area that is surrounded by single- family residential housing. ti Facilities: Gravel parking lot-:'"'• Trails Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ MnDNR for Parcel 0057 Stakeholders Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: Highwood was purchased by the city in 1971. The area has been left in Ass natural state with the exception of a walking trail that was developed. Several species of birds, ground hogs, fox and deer are common in this area. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 07-117-23 44 0074 11.29 Purchased by City in 1971 07-117-23 44 0059 TF 0.22 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0058 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1980 (Owned by MnDNR) 07-117-23 44 0057 0.23 Tax forfeit ? 07-117-23 44 0056 TF 0.22 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0055 TF 0.12 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0054 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1988 07-117-23 44 0053 TF 0.23 Tax forfeit 1991 07-117-23 410002 TF 0.32 part of 1971 purchase? 07-117-23 410003 0.60 Park Name: Lowry Woods ` 0') s Classification: Community Park Location: South of the Luce Line Trail between the roads of Luce Line Ridge and Cristofori Circle Aft Size (in acres): 14.1 Description: Isolated and currently land -locked parcel of land. It is heavily forested along with rolling to steep terrain. The property is densely vegetated with - deciduous trees and contains a segment of old growth Oak, Maple and Basswood forest. There is also a small evergreen mix of Pine varieties. Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or Conveyance from Nature Conservancy requires Conditions: that the City of Orono maintain the property in a natural state. No development except trails is allowed. �. Notes: Lowry Woods is a Bi, Woods remnant of the Old-': Maple Basswood forests once found throughout ~ the area. The forest is available for research by l� 5` scientists or for nature walks and study. Mr. and Mrs. Lowry donated the 14 acres of land to the Nature Conservancy in 1965 for use as a natural "` area with the idea that if it became inappropriate .± '�` to be held as a natural area it could be sold. The proceeds must be used to purchase another natural area. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 31-118-23 43 0009 14.1 Donated to Nature Conservancy by Mrs. Lowry in 1964; conveyed to Orono in 1994 Park Name: Lydiard Beach Classification: Lake Access/Beach Location: At the east end of Lydiard Ave ' Size (in acres): .85 Description: Narrow strip of land 66 feet wide. Parking lot is near the beach area. Area is adjacent to lagoons which serves as small marinas for Walters Port Lane and Carman Road residents. Facilities: Sand beach Bike rack Gravel parking lot Picnic Table f gate and fence Buoys. Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential 5 Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: s PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.70 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of `Townsite of Langdon Park' (1893) Park Name: Navarre Playground's " Classification: Neighborhood Park Location: 3408 Lyric Ave Size (in acres): 1.08 Description: Small park along busy intersection. Located near both commercial and residential areas. Facilities: Playground Benches Picnic Tables Half court Basket Ball Information Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential and Commercial _ Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: Original improvements and playground equipment were funded through CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) and park dedication funds in the 1970's. This is one of the only playgrounds located in the most densely populated southwest corner of Orono. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 43 0078 0.31 City purchased in 2004 17-117-23 43 0079 0.15 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0080 0.15 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0081 0.11 Tax forfeit 1979 17-117-23 43 0082 0.03 Old Right of Way 17-117-23 44 0008 0.14 Tax forfeit 1982 17-117-23 44 0015 0.19 Tax forfeit 1980 Park Name: Orono Golf Course` .r"-. # Classification: Special Use Area Location: 265 Orono Orchard Road South Size (in acres): 45.63 ' f. E r Description: 9 hole Golf Course on rolling hills.; Facilities: Golf course Club house Parking lot (approximately 35-40 vehicles) Adjacent Land Use: Single -family residential y, Special use Groups/ Golfers Stakeholders: Sledding and Cross country skiers in the winter Restrictions or None Conditions: Notes: The Orono Golf Course is a picturesque nine-hole course with varying topography, elevated greens, mature trees, and a wooded buffer on the course perimeter. It was founded in 1924, and has the distinction of being the first public golf course in Minnesota with grass greens. In 2017 the parks commission had a master plan prepared to look at both golf related and other recreational future opportunities. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 02-117-23 22 0005 45.63 Purchased by City in 1967 Park Name: Pleasant View L-.1 Classification: Community Park Location: Mahpiyata Island (west island of Big Island) �-- Size (in acres): 1.25 Description: Largely natural and undeveloped land f Facilities: None , Adjacent Land Use: Single-family cottagesi Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders• -1 Restrictions or None Conditions• Notes: Island residents use park to access each other and water. i i i PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated 1.25 Dedicated in plat of `Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka' (1888) parkland Park Name: Saga Hill Classification: Nature/Conservation Area Location: Located along the west side of the Wildhurst Trail about 1/3 mile north of Tonkaview Lane. ~ • '' +' bF Size (in acres): 28.96 Description: The park is also a wooded site. Facilities: Parking Lot Trails — —! 1 Benches Information Signs` — — — -- — —7+1 Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ DNR Stakeholders: r f- - Restrictions or Conservation Easement The DNR portion "(a) The Property shall Conditions: be managed and maintained consistent with the purpose and type of property acquired using appropriate management and protection practices to protect the natural and/or scenic resources; and (b) This part of the Property may not be used for any other purpose without the express written approval of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (the 'DNR')." This - declaration shall be binding and run with the property for a period of twenty (20) years and shall be automatically renewed for consecutive ten (10) year periods. Tax forfeiture parcel has no use restrictions. Notes: The portion of the park with the DNR restrictions was purchased from Midway Bank in St. Paul. Area residences raised the funds for this and were successful due to anonymous donor. The park was restored in 2017. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 07-117-23 22 0007 3.43 Purchased 1999 07-117-23 22 0008 3.45 Purchased 1999 `Sollner Properties" 07-117-23 23 0019 1.46 Purchased 1999 07-117-23 23 0029 8.70 Tax forfeit 1998 07-117-23 23 0034 0.70 Tax forfeit 2008 07-117-23 23 0020 1.72 Purchased 1996 07-117-23 23 0021 1.88 Purchased 1996 07-117-23 23 0022 1.91 Purchased 1996 Park Name: Sandy Beach Classification: Lake Access/Beach I .. Location: At end of Maple Place on North Arm Bay 1PO, z Size (in acres): 0.28 Description: Narrow stretch of lake access.. Facilities: Bike rack Picnic Table City information sin Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: 17 IN Restrictions or None Conditions: x Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.28 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of `Crystal Bay View' (189 1) Park Name: Summit Park Beach f Classification: Lake Access/Beach �0 Location: 455 East Long Lake Road E� Size (in acres): 4.56 Description: Park is somewhat secluded off of East Long Lake Road, park consists of a small beach area with a dock, a wooded picnic area, a canoe launch and a wetland area toward the north side of the parcel. •+� Facilities: Gravel parking lot (10 to 15 vehicles) Picnic tables Canoe storage rack Seasonal chemical toilets Park identification sign 4 F t Adjacent Land Use: Single -Family Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders • _ Restrictions or None Conditions: I]1G NU G.0°Riff-i1'[1 Notes: City Beach property on Long Lake was donated to the city by Bruce Dayton. This park is close to the Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area which was donated to the Department of Natural Resources by Bruce and Ruth Dayton. Motorized boat access to the park is not allowed. Park Name: Susan B Lurton Park Classification: Special Use r 1 - h • , Location: 3589 Wayzata Blvd Size (in acres): 39 Description: Off Leash Dog Park Facilities: Parking Trails Toilet Well W"`1 Picnic Tables Information Signs Benches Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential M �" Special use Groups/ Lurton Family Stakeholders: Restrictions or Restrictive covenants were established that Conditions: limit improvements. Hunting and ballfields are specifically prohibited on the property. Notes: "Lurton Park Property" is the former C. W. Gordon farmstead located on the southwestern shore of Lake Classen and originally established in the nineteenth century. The 39 -acre property was donated to the City by William and Susan Lurton in 2000 for use as a passive, natural environmental park. The park was transformed into and off leach dog park in 2017. Park Maintenance is provided through a special Lurton Park Fund and through user fees. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 32-118-23 12 0001 30.45 Donation in 2000 by Bill and Sue Lurton Park Name: Big Island Nature Park Classification: Community Park i Location: Big Island, Lake MinnetonkatA +� ` .� Size (in acres): 56 Description: Facilities: Docks Beach Small Building Trails' ;t , Adjacent Land Use: Season Recreational Cabins Special use Groups/ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Stakeholders: _• 1 Restrictions or A majority of the site is in a Conservation Conditions: Easement. The park is managed under the Big Island V" ; Management plan, 2011. The park has it own section in the city Code Article IV, Sections 22-111 thru 116 Notes: The Park is intended to serve a dual role in preservation of a unique natural setting while offering the public a variety of passive recreational opportunities. The land on which the Park lies has a rich history of recreational use that today's casual passerby might never have imagined. It was home to an amusement park in the early 1900s operated by the Twin City Rapid Transit Company This regional attraction lasted only 6 seasons before it closed and was eventually dismantled. Remnants of the grandeur of the Big Island Amusement Park can still be found on the site, including the grand entry portal stairway and old foundation remnants hidden among the Island's wooded glens. In 1923 the property became the Big Island Veterans Camp, offering camping and other recreational opportunities to Minnesota's war veterans. Use of the camp by veterans and their families continued until 2003, when the Vets Camp Board of Governors voted to dispose of the property and use the proceeds for other veterans needs throughout Minnesota. The City of Orono stepped up and in partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District obtained a grant from the State of Minnesota to purchase the property for park purposes. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 23-117-23 210001 46.12 City purchase in 2006 with $2M Stat /$3M City/$850K MCWD 23-117-23 22 0001 4.67 14-117-23 34 0001 5.66 Name: I Lake Access Point 2 Classification: I Lake Access Location: I Spates Avenue at Shoreline Facilities: I Gravel access lane Adjacent Land Use: I Comercial and Residential Special use Groups/ Marina at 1955 Shoreline Stakeholders Restrictions or Winter Access Only Conditions: Notes: Name: Lake Access Point 4 Classification: Lake Access �1L Location: North Shore Drive at Baldur Park Road between 3498/3510 Facilities: 30 ft wide graveled lane � Adjacent Land Use: Residential QRS { �'[3 Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or Winter access Only Conditions: x Notes: Name: Lake Access Point 6 Classification: Lake Access L B'AI� Location: Crystal Bay Road Facilities: 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore. City Facilities: also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the RD ` 1 :,' j Residential east for an additional 200' of shoreline I �. Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Local property owners Stakeholders: Restrictions or A number of inland private parcels claim deeded Conditions: access rights for "boating and bathing" Notes:LS wn x r. Name: Lake Access Point 9 (Gibbs Landing) Classification: Lake Access Location: Adjacent to/ west of 3125 Fox Street. Facilities: Trail to Lake Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Owner of 3125 Fox Street Restrictions or Conditions: Pedestrian access year-round, vehicles winter only Notes: Tax records show access as Out lot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Out lot, Name: Lake Access Point 10 340 Classification: Lake Access 3464 0 Location: East Lake Street between 3424 and 3465 m Location: y 3444 Facilities: 30' platted roadwayo ti Facilities: Fa rcax€sr L _ _141, Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders Restrictions or Winter access Only Conditions: Stakeholders: ` 405 Notes: Restrictions or Name: Lake Access 11 0 a Classification: Lake Access a m Location: Bayside Road at Stubbs Bay Road m a ti Facilities: Fishing Dock LS B.4YSILiER17 Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: T~ o�Q Restrictions or Summer Fishing Dock Conditions: Winter Snowmobile Acess Notes: Name: I Lake Access 14 Name: I Lake Access 22 Classification: Lake Access LS w Location: South end of West Lake Street Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders Restrictions or Walking Access Only Conditions• Notes: Drainage way for Est Lake Street. Name: I Lake Access 22 Name: Lake Access 34 ,: i 1119 1090 1096 fq NDA E Aba 1130 -AJIO Classification: Lake access Location: Loma Linda Avenue beween 1098 and 1130 Facilities: Fishing Dock Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders • None Restrictions or Conditions: Location: Notes: 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Name: Lake Access 34 Classification: Lake access , Location: Corral Road between 1785 and 1825 Concordia Street Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ None Stakeholders: Restrictions or Walking access only Conditions: Notes: Mainly used as a drainage way. Name: Lake access #38 / Ivy Lane +► _ 1 Classification: Lake Access Location: Ivy Place between 3486 and 3508 Facilities: 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Pedestrian Access Notes: Steep, used for drainage Name: I Lake Access #40 a Classification: Lake Acess g u Location: Between 2470 Carman/3555 Frederick. Facilities: 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock FRFa�Rrc►c sr Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: City of Orono, sake Minnetonka Access Points, - . Desi mated Use .and.0 [D Access Name Plat Section IBetween Designated Use # or Street Name jAddress #s Brown's Bay (Lower Lake) 1End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 No public access la Shoreline Drive - "Molly's Corner" (Outlot A, Dragonfly Hill) 2-S Across from 1410 Shoreline Shore Fishing (Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2Shoreline Drive at Spates 10-5 Adj to 1955 Winter Only 3 orth Shore Drive at Shoreline Drive 10-5 5-N No public access Crystal Bay 4 North Shore Drive at Baldur Park 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 11 Road 5-N round, vehicles Fishing Dock 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr 17-N 1998/2000 drainage way 6 Crystal Bay Road (West end) 17-S Adj to 2264 Pedestrian 14 Westlake Street 5-N Shadywood Access / Bathing 7 Crystal Bay Road (Relocated 17-5 3405/3415 Pedestrian Fishing Dock extension of Bayview Place in plat of Oak Street 6-S Access drainage way "Wallace's Addition...") Baldur Park Road 13339/3345 Across from 1384/1392 8 Crystal Bay Road (Platted extension 17-5 Utilities of Hillside Place Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing - Fox St. 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian year- Winter Only 11 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N round, vehicles Fishing Dock 12 Bayside Rd 5-N winter only Tubbs Bay 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 11 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from 3640, 3700, 3750 Ba side No public access 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of 3775 Bayside o public access 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 Pedestrian Access North Arm Bay. 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 drainage way 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from 1384/1392 Winter Access 18 Oak Place (Platted road in plat of "C stal Ba View" 8-S 3768/3818 North Shore Dr o public access 19 Sandy Beach (Extension of Maple Place 8-S 3898/3908 Cherry Ave Swimming Beach 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/1330 Cherry PI Drainage way 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 No public access 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 Pedestrian to Orono/M'trista border) Pt Rd Access 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 drainage way 25 "Summit Avenue" (Extension of 7-S 1067/1101 drainage way Access Elmwood Avenue) Street I lutilities 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 1453 drainage way Fishine dock Park Dr Access f West Arm'Bay 27orth Shore Drive west end (adjacent 7-S "4795" Shoreline Swimming to Orono/M'trista border) Pt Rd Beach 37 Casco Circle 20-5 3195/3205 drainage way 28 orth Shore Drive at "Adams Street" 7-S 4731/4745 drainage way Access Extension Street 20-5 drainage way 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 Pedestrian Fishine dock Access 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 Pedestrian Access 31 Orchard Beach Place 7-S West of 1530 Pedestrian Access 32 Highwood Lane Extension 7-S 4156/4167 Highwood Rd drainage way 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 drainage way 34 Corral Road Extension 17-N 1785/1825 rainage way Concordia pedestrian access 35 Fagerness Point Accretions 18-N Across from No public access 1965/1985 Fagerness Pt Rd JSpring Fark.B.ay 36Casco Point Beach 20-5 2871/2879 Casco Swimming Pt Rd Beach 37 Casco Circle 20-5 3195/3205 2600/2618Casco Pedestrian drainage way Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 drainage way 39 "Spring Street" 20-5 2600/2618Casco Pedestrian Point Rd Access 40Carman Street 20-5 2490 Carman/ 3555 Frederick Fishine dock 41 ILydiard Beach 20-5 End of Lydiard RdSwi mming Beach Big Island A End of "Lawn Avenue" 23-N 110 B E. end of "Tooisit Avenue" 23-N 110/120 C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 E "Meadow Lane East Extended" 23-S 280/290 F "Meta -Comet Avenue South" 23-S 340 G "Massasolt Avenue West End" 23-S 440/450 H "Meadow Lane Alley" 23-S 450/460 1 !"Pleasant View Street" I 22-S 570/600 ..................................................... i ... i Status ........................................... . UPDATED 4/2/01; UPDATED 5/21/08; UPDATED 1/26/18 Notes Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible Gated in summer; winter vehicular access allowed. As of 2016 privately owned with city easment for lake acess and sanitary back up generator. Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use 30' wide platted road right-of-way 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on either side 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore; City also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the I2 east for an additional 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for "boating and bathing". 20' relocated alley from Railroad property to shoreline; potential lake access from railway corridor. The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed filed Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20' strip is "heretofore taken for street purposes" and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer lines, potential access from neighborhood and Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Tax records show access as Outlot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City maintains access 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 33' platted road ("Oak Street" in plat of "Bay View Park") Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line Two 60' platted roads and one 65' platted road to the Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park; and Theresa St. in plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka). These potential access oints are not opened for public use. 30' realigned platted road (Realigned "Lake Street" in the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka) (See street file 3775 Bayside). Not opened for public use. 30' platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only. 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline - usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 30' wide platted road, not developed, steep slopes and ravine limit use W end of platted developed road as it extends to shoreline 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to shoreline; mostly wetland or under water, Encroached by shared driveway 60' wide platted roadway used for City beach 50' wide platted road, undeveloped 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped, Encroached 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access 60' wide platted road right-of-way, access not developed, walking use only. Encroachments present 20' wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to shoreline, drainage way 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not developed, drainage way 33' platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co. Rd. 19 plus tax -forfeited Lot 10, Block 6, "Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..."; undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes 40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of "Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..." undeveloped, very steep, used for drainage 33' platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake 16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline, paved but no boat launching available 50' platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline; tree growth and topography limits vehicular access 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline; steep slope to shoreline, undeveloped I20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not developed 20' platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking access Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat of "Fagerness' ; title registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no public access remaining 60' wide platted road ("Carman St") used as a City swimming beach 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place - steep, used for drainage 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of "Kaster Cove" - undeveloped, walking access only 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, used as a City swimming beach 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Island Park 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Island Park - slope makes use difficult 90' wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable ravel road for emergency & service vehicle access 50'+1- wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, Morse Island Park 20' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Morse Island Park - steep slope makes use difficult 33' wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Park 2nd Addition 33' wide platted roadway between Lot 1, Morse Island Park and Lot 1, Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park - steep slope 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 5 Plan Implementation Comprehensive Plan Adoption and amendment Implementation Capital Improvement Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Appendix Appendix 1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Appendix 2 Zoning Map 5-1 5-3 5-4 5-5 CMP Part 5. Implementation CMP Part 5 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION COMPREHENSIVE PLANADOPTIONAND AMENDMENT PLAN PREPARATION The basic goals and philosophies contained in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan were continued insubseq tplaw and are still the backbone of this 2020-2040 CMP. This update has been drafted by City Staff with input from an Advisory Committee established to advise the city on the development of this plan, and a separate committee and consultant, WSB and Associates, established to advise the city and its consultant on the development of the Navarre Area Plan. The Planning Commission and City Council received this input and support this plan. PLAN ADOPTION Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 2, the Orono Planning Commission explained the intent and the details of the CMP, and received public comments thereon, at an official Public Hearing held for that purpose on . Notice of the Hearing was published in the official City newspaper on Following closing of the Public Hearing, and after discussion concerning changes and comments resulting from the Hearing, the Planning Commission on a vote of recommended that the City Council adopt the Plan. On the Orono City Council on a vote of approved the concept and direction of the Community Management Plan, and adopted Resolution granting preliminary approval of the plan and ordering its submittal to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. This Community Management Plan was delivered to the Metropolitan Council on for their official review and approval. Metropolitan Council granted formal approval of the Plan on . The Orono City Council formally adopted the Plan via Resolution No. on on a vote of_ ayes and _ nay. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 2 CMP Part 5. Implementation PLAN DISTRIBUTION This CMP and any future amendments made thereto shall be distributed to the following agencies and jurisdictions as required by law: CITY OF ORONO City Clerk - 2 copies for permanent record METROPOLITAN COUNCIL STATE OF MINNESOTA Department of Transportation Department of Natural Resources HENNEPIN COUNTY Administration Department of Transportation ADJACENT MUNICIPALITIES Chanhassen Deephaven Eden Prairie Greenwood Independence Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetrista Mound Plymouth Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata SCHOOL DISTRICTS 276 Minnetonka 277 Westonka 278 Orono 284 Wayzata INDEPENDENT DISTRICTS Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Three Rivers Park District PERIODIC REVIEW The Community Management Plan is intended to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, and updated if necessary, on an annual basis. PLAN AMENDMENT After formal adoption of this CMP by the City Council, there shall be no amendments made to the plan content except by the following applicable state law. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 3 CMP Part 5. Implementation IMPLEMENTATION The City utilizes various tools to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The primary tools include, but are not limited to: 1) Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map — Chapter 78 of the City Code 2) Subdivision Regulations — Chapter 82 of the City Code 3) Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulations — Chapter 58 of the City Code 4) Sewer and Water System Regulations — Chapters 14 and 82 of the of the City Code 5) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Appendix A) 6) City Budget 7) City Fee Schedule (esp. sewer, water, and park dedication fees to support infrastructure). Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map The current zoning map is attached as Appendix B. The City intends to review these official controls for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan within nine months of adopting the Plan as required by State law. The City will also make any changes which are necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan within this timeframe. The City has identified that the following changes may be necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan: 1) Review standards for development within the Mixed Residential Land Use. 2) Amend official controls to achieve consistency with updated density requirements for Medium -High Density Residential and High Density Residential land uses. 3) Amend official zoning map for property for which a Future Land Use Map was amended. 4) Review environmental protection regulations. Administrative Provisions The Ordinances pertaining to general government operation are updated on an ongoing basis to reflect current policy and requirements. General performance standard revisions may be needed to be consistent with the CMP, with current development concerns and with recognized existing situations. The City wishes to carefully protect CMP plans and neighborhood property values, but does not want to require unnecessary zoning reviews, extensive delays, or unrealistic standards. Areas needing attention include: commercial district development standards and uses, lake access management, standards for private roads, and nonconforming use provisions. Ists Management The City's progressive policies regarding management of individual sewage treatment systems will be continued and strengthened as the best insurance policy against unnecessary extension of municipal sewers into the Rural Area. The City will continue to provide for a full-time City employee whose duties are public education and the enforcement of proper on-site sewage treatment system operation. Current ordinances provide for regular system maintenance and for periodical inspection of all existing systems by the City inspector. Environmental Ordinances The Shoreland Management ordinances adopted in 1992 require only minimal if any revisions at City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 4 CMP Part 5. Implementation this time. An updated Floodplain Ordinance was adopted in 2016 to be in conformitywith FEMA and other regulations, and a new Wetlands Ordinance was adopted in 2005 in compliance with MCWD requirements as well as those of the Surface Water Management Plan. Certain additional amendments of these Ordinances may be required upon forthcoming adoption of the updated SWMP. Lake Use Ordinances The regulations involving lake use, harbor limits and management of access to Lake Minnetonka as a recreational resource will be reviewed to determine whether they should more adequately incorporate Lake Minnetonka Conservation District rules where appropriate, and to provide City regulation wherenecessary. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Overview In order to achieve Orono's development goals and objectives in accordance with the CMP, expenditures of public funds will be required. Such expenditures may include acquisition of park and open space lands, road construction or reconstruction, maintenance equipment purchases, municipal building improvements, utility extension or reconstruction, stormwater management facilities construction, and the like. The city annually reviews the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify and prioritize capital expenditures over a sufficient period to allow for adequate financial and budgetary planning. The CIP allows the City Council to make sound financial decisions for accomplishing the various capital improvements required to implement the CMP. The CIP is attached as Appendix A to this chapter. Potential funding sources for capital improvement expenditures may include: General Fund - Special Assessment - General Obligation Bonds - Revenue Bonds - Tax Increment Financing - Development Impact Fees - Grants from public agencies - Donations SUMMARY OF PROJECTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Commercial/Industrial Development Infrastructure The public improvements required to support Orono=s planned development are essentially in place. Minor expansions of infrastructure are expected to be paid for by the developer. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 5 CMP Part 5. Implementation Sewer/Water Systems Renovation Ongoing maintenance of the City --s sewer and water systems occasionally requires capital expenditures for major rehabilitation work. These system renovation projects will be primarily funded by revenues from operation of these utilities, with additional necessary funding from special assessment to the systemusers. Parks and Open Space The CIP includes a Parks, Open Space and Trails element. The primary capital expenditures will involve the improvement and maintenance of existing park lands. Funding sources will include fees collected through the subdivision process (Park Fund), the General Fund, and grants or donations from public agencies and private entities. A large proportion of Orono's existing preserved open space has been through private and public contribution. Stormwater Management Implementation of Orono's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) will require significant public expenditures, including site acquisition and construction of stormwater retention ponds, storm sewer construction, and related projects. Funding sources will include the City's Stormwater and Drainage Utility Fees (charged to all properties on an annual basis); the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees (charged to all new developments); the General Fund; and grants from other public agencies. Road Maintenance and Reconstruction Reconstruction of City roads has in the past been funded through the General Fund rather than by special assessments. This practice is expected to continue. Minnesota State Aid (MSA) funding for reconstruction of qualified road segments will be a principal source of funding for ongoing road reconstruction. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Orono has a number of long-standing interrelationships with surrounding jurisdictions and public agencies. These relationships have arisen as a result of many and varied factors, including: geographic proximity; efficiency and economies of scale; mutual goals and philosophies; and a desire to provide for a more uniform and coordinated planning and delivery of services. Orono will continue to encourage cooperative local efforts for the sharing of services, equipment and facilities. Cooperation with regional and state governmental units will be encouraged, especially where mutual goals can be identified and implemented. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 6 Council MINUTES OF THE Exhibit B ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 18-000044 Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 7. LAI 8-000044 CITY OF ORONO, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2040 UPDATE, 7:46 P.M. — 8:30 P.M. Barnhart noted this item is intended to apprise the Planning Commission on the proposed changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan but that he is not asking the Planning Commission to approve the 2040 amendment at this time. Barnhart stated since April of 2017, a committee that was put together by the City Council has met monthly and reviewed specific chapters of the existing Comprehensive Plan and directed Staff to make certain changes. The committee operated under three primary goals: 1. Preserve Orono's rural character and natural resources. Keep rural areas rural and not add unnecessary traffic. 2. Meet the Metropolitan Council requirements that are established for all cities under their jurisdiction. 3. Improve the readability of the Comprehensive Plan. On April 26, the Committee authorized the publication of the plan for public comment, which officially commenced May 1. The public comment period includes the distribution of the plan to affected communities. Those agencies are allowed six months to provide comment. The plan was distributed to 26 affected jurisdictions, including the Conservation District, Hennepin County Transportation Department, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The City has received one comment back already from the City of Plymouth, who had no recommended changes. An open house was held on May 10 and comments were invited but none were received. Barnhart noted the open house was not as well attended as Staff would like but that there will be another open house in the fall. Barnhart stated he is looking for authorization to submit the update to the Metropolitan Council for their preliminary review so their comments can be addressed. The final plan is due by December 31 of next year. Barnhart noted the key piece that most people are interested in is land use and that the committee and Staff tried to not make wholesale changes on the land use side. Currently the Metropolitan Council recognizes some areas of Orono as undeveloped, which is the light green color on the map, and Orono looks at those as rural areas and will not be changing those. Thiesse asked if the Metropolitan Council considers non -buildable lots as undeveloped. Barnhart indicated Staff does not go to that level of detail and that he is not sure whether the Metropolitan Council makes that distinction. Barnhart noted there is not a huge change in land use between the 2030 and 2040 plan and that most of the land use changes have occurred in the northern area of the City. Two of those changes are consistent with recent amendments that have already been approved. The third change is located at the corner of Willow and Wayzata Boulevard where some high-density residential was introduced next to Orono Woods and another high-density area was introduced south of Kelley Page 1 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Parkway. Barnhart noted the City does not have to approve the first high-density project that is proposed and that any proposed project must be consistent with the City's regulations. Barnhart noted another area of high interest is the Navarre area. In the 2030 plan, the brown color on the map depicts mixed use. Shadywood Villas was recently approved on the south side of Shadywood Road. Also in the area is the Freshwater Business Center and a vacant lot. The 2040 plan still designates commercial at the main corner of Shadywood and Shoreline, which will likely be the component of a redevelopment process. Also in the area is medium residential density around the townhomes. The 2040 plan removes the residential from the south side of Shadywood Road and has been changed to commercial. The 2040 plan also introduces some additional residential near the fire station on the north and south side. No other new residential areas were added. Barnhart stated the Metropolitan Council predicts a certain amount of growth within each city and each city is supposed to provide an opportunity for that growth over the next 20 years. Those opportunities for growth were identified in the 2008 plan in the form of a planned development site map. That site map identified areas for potential growth and are outlined in heavy red on the map. It included Orono Preserve, Eisinger Meadows, the area around the fire station, and the Irvin Jacobs property. Area E on the map depicts areas that the City anticipated connection to the sanitary sewer system. Barnhart noted whenever the City extends the MUSA boundary, the density must be at least three units per acre. Barnhart noted there has been some discussion over the last ten years or so regarding areas that could be guided to serve as a buffer to meet the Metropolitan Council's requirement relating to MUSA. Originally Eisinger Meadows was guided to be 15 units an acre but came in at five units an acre and some of the other projects have been less than what they were originally guided for. As a result, the City's buffer has been significantly reduced. A consequence of that may be that some of the properties that would like to connect to the MUSA may be denied by the Metropolitan Council. Barnhart noted in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the Navarre area has no new developments south or west of Shadywood Road. The green areas depict the two -acre lots and 690 Brown Road has been added to the area. Barnhart noted the City has already received some sketch plan concepts over the last couple of years for that parcel and it is anticipated it will be developed at some point in the next ten years. The Dumas Orchard has been kept the same and three residential parcels along Kelley Parkway have been added. Through the review, Staff and the committee have attempted to identify development sites where growth is anticipated but growth is not limited to those areas. The committee also looked at impacts to infrastructure over the next ten years. The chart identifies the anticipated areas of growth as required by the Metropolitan Council. The City is projected to have 523 new sewered households by 2030 and 330 more sewered households after 2040. Barnhart stated in the 2040 plan, the City has provided an opportunity for those homes but that they are not obligated to approve any development that does not meet the City's requirements. Barnhart stated at this time he is looking for authorization to move it forward to the City Council and that the Planning Commission will have the next four or five months to review the Comprehensive Plan in more detail. Changes will be made in October based on feedback and then the plan will be back before the Planning Commission in November. Landgraver asked how Staff would like feedback on minor comments. Page 2 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart requested all suggestions be sent directly to him and that he will make those changes in October once he has received all the feedback. Landgraver asked if there is a document that details what changes there are between the two plans. Lemke commented the public is more concerned about what is changing rather than reviewing the entire plan. Barnhart stated he does not believe he can do that since a new document was created based largely on the old plan Lemke asked how the plan will be presented to the public. Barnhart indicated it is in the public realm right now and that people can submit written comments. Landgraver asked how community interest can be generated in this update. Barnhart stated the challenge is that it is hard for a resident to understand how it impacts them, which is the reason for the maps. Barnhart stated he does not believe most people care how Orono complies with the sewer regulations and that a committee of 13 Orono residents was formed to help review the plan and recommend various changes. Staff and the committee have identified what anticipated land use changes there will be. Landgraver stated when you look around Orono, affordable housing is not real dominant and there does not appear to be a real plan for developing affordable housing. Barnhart pointed out affordable housing is often dictated upon the price of the land and that two options to provide for affordable housing are, one, the City purchase the property or, two, provide tax increment financing. Barnhart stated Orono is not likely to use those options unless they absolutely have to and that he sees the land value as a huge deterrent to affordable housing. Barnhart stated putting affordable housing in the middle of nowhere does not really achieve anything since more public services would also be needed in those areas and those currently do not exist. Barnhart stated the City has to provide the opportunity for affordable housing. Lemke stated Mr. Barnhart's explanation was very helpful and that he was wondering how that can be communicated to the general public. Barnhart stated he is open to any way the Comprehensive Plan update can be promoted. Seals suggested a YouTube video be placed on the City's website detailing the changes. Landgraver stated if an area is being changed, the City could perhaps notify the residents of that area within a certain distance and that they would then be targeting an audience that is subjected to change. Thiesse stated there is also a responsibility of the public to become involved. Thiesse stated in his view the plan is good and he appreciates the work of the committee and Staff. Thiesse asked why the Metropolitan Council is looking to have more sewered properties. Page 3 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart indicated the Metropolitan Council anticipates those properties are more likely to be developed. Seals asked whether the City expects comment back from the Metropolitan Council. Barnhart stated they do and that he is preliminarily submitting it to make sure nothing was missed that might delay final approval further on down the road. Landgraver asked who in the City reviews the other cities' Comprehensive Plan updates. Barnhart indicated he would do the initial review and then it would go to the City Administrator. Barnhart stated they are primarily looking for any changes that would impact Orono. Thiesse asked what would happen if he has a piece of property that is deemed open space and it is rezoned. Barnhart stated a number of parks and open spaces have been identified in the plan and they are often permanent uses but that designation can be changed if the land is privately owned and the owner would like to change it. Barnhart noted that is what the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process is about. Thiesse commented the City kind of puts the burden on the property owner to change it. Barnhart stated the property owner can request it be amended if it is zoned parks and open spaces but that the City's zoning ordinance must match the Comprehensive Plan per state statute. Landgraver stated if the City is re -guiding someone's property a different way, they should probably know about it and that it would be better to hear that feedback now. Barnhart stated the City has a right to guide property the way the City deems appropriate but that he agrees with Commissioner Landgraver. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. Lemke moved, Landgraver seconded, to recommend the Comprehensive Plan Update be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Page 4 of 4 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: May 21, 2018 Subject: #LA18-44, City of Orono, 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, Public Hearing Council Exhibit C 18-000044 Application Summary: The City requests authorization from the Planning Commission and City Council, following a public hearing at the Planning Commission, to submit the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan update to the Metropolitan Council. Formal approval will be requested in November, following the public comment period. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends authorization of the document to be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. Background The City officially started the development of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update in March 2017 with the appointment of thirteen members (and one alternate) of the community to advise staff. The members are: Jennifer Smiley, Resident Meg Cowden, Resident Chad Olson, Planning Commission Candice Nadler, Resident Paul Pesek, Park Commission Jon Schwingler, Planning Commission Bob Erickson, Resident Dennis Libby, Resident Phil Lusardi, Resident John Morast, Resident Jan Berg, Park Commission Rick Meyers, Park Commission (Alternate) Dennis Walsh, Mayor Richard Crosby, Councilmember Since April 2017, this Committee met monthly and reviewed specific chapters of the draft plan, and proposed changes to the document. The meeting information and agendas are posted on the city's website for public consumption. The Committee operated under three primary goals: 1. Retain rural character and natural resource protection policies established in previous plans FILE #18-44 May 21, 2018 Page 2 of 4 2. Satisfy Met Council requirements 3. Improve the readability of the document. The changes recommended by the Committee along with formatting and updated maps are included into a final document, and on April 26th the Committee authorized the publication of the plan for public comment. The public comment period includes the distribution of the plan to affected communities. These agencies are allowed 6 months opt provide comment. On May 10th, an open house was held to introduce the plan to the public, comments were invited but none were received. The Plan. The complete plan in .pdf format has been uploaded to drop box. The complete plan, and the individual chapters, and exhibits, is available on the city website. The plan retains the general development and land protection philosophy's established by earlier plans. Preservation of rural character and preservation of water quality was very important to the committee. Metropolitan Council estimates. The Metropolitan Council requires the plans to reflect growth in population, households, and employment over the next 20 years. The Committee, in meeting the Met Council predictions, noted that the City retains its' right to review development proposals for consistency with the Comprehensive plan (not just land use) and applicable zoning ordinances and to ensure a development is the right fit for the neighborhood and city as a whole. Points of interest. Utility Plans. Utility Plans were updated to reflect new regulations and rules establishec since the 2008 plan and to incorporate plans adopted since 2008. Of note, the comprehensive plan does not propose the expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. The MUSA boundary generally identifies those parcels where access to the sanitary sewer system is possible. City Code requires connection to the sanitary sewer system with the utility is available (adjacent) at the time of subdivision and/ or failure of the existing system. Expansion of the MUSA comes with a Table 313-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Severed and Unsevered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/M 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement The Committee, in meeting the Met Council predictions, noted that the City retains its' right to review development proposals for consistency with the Comprehensive plan (not just land use) and applicable zoning ordinances and to ensure a development is the right fit for the neighborhood and city as a whole. Points of interest. Utility Plans. Utility Plans were updated to reflect new regulations and rules establishec since the 2008 plan and to incorporate plans adopted since 2008. Of note, the comprehensive plan does not propose the expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. The MUSA boundary generally identifies those parcels where access to the sanitary sewer system is possible. City Code requires connection to the sanitary sewer system with the utility is available (adjacent) at the time of subdivision and/ or failure of the existing system. Expansion of the MUSA comes with a FILE #18-44 May 21, 2018 Page 3 of 4 requirement that parcels located within the expanded area be developed at 3 units per acre or greater. The MUSA boundary is shown on Map 313-4, Development Sites. Land Use. To meet the growth projections of the Metropolitan Council, the Land Use Map was updated. The map (313-3) reflects a revised listing of land use categories. These 10 categories are used throughout the document per Met Council requirements and include 7 residential, 2 commercial/ industrial, and a park/open space land use. Island residential is a new land use and is employed for the residences on Big Island and Deering Island. For the majority of the community, land use did not change. In the Navarre area, residential land uses was removed from the west side of Shadywood in favor of straight commercial uses. The remaining mixed use or high density residential land uses along Shoreline were adjusted from 6-15 units per acre and 7-10 units per acre to 10-20 and 20-25 units per acre. These areas are predominately currently developed and therefore the result of a significant redevelopment project. In the northern portion of the community, residential land uses were introduced to the Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Blvd areas. In order to prevent expansion of the MUSA, and therefore introduction of density in our rural areas, increased opportunity for density had to be added in the Navarre and northern Orono areas. The Committee applied density in areas where they felt it was most appropriate, given transportation networks, neighboring land uses, and services available. Planned Development Sites. As part of our requirement that sites be identified for potential growth in the next 20 years, the Committee updated the Planned Development Suites map, originally developed as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Map 313-4 is the revised version and shows 5 areas that could be the subject of development proposals. These 5 areas provide 'growth' in a range of densities, from 2 acre lots (green) to High Density Residential (Yellow). Navarre Area Plan. The Navarre Area Plan, conducted by the Planning Consultant WSB and Associates was incorporated in the Land Use Chapter, 3B and influenced some of the land use in that area. Editing. The Committee worked hard to reduce the length of the document, removing redundant statements, in the hopes of making it more 'readable' while retaining the major policy discussions outlined within. Maps. The maps were updated to reflect new roads and parcels established since the 2008 plan. The Park Commission reviewed the park Trail and Open Space Chapter at their meeting in March Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Public comments will be collected over the FILE #18-44 May 21, 2018 Page 4 of 4 summer and fall, and provided to the committee who will review, take appropriate action, and resubmit the plan for formal Planning Commission and Council action in November. Issues for Consideration. The Commission could contemplate the following policy questions identified through the review of the document and discuss in the following months, or at the final review of the document. These policy questions may include: 1. Should the city more aggressively require connection to sanitary sewer services when these services are available at the time of house construction or at the time when a existing system requires replacement. 2. The public has several rights of way, many of which are unimproved. Some of these rights of way terminate in the Lake. Should the City continue to retain these rights of way when no clear present use is known, recognizing the ability to reacquire these parcels is challenging? 3. Should the city expand the MUSA boundary to add additional sewered density in favor of keeping existing sewered areas lower density? 4. With respect to dwelling size, should the city explore minimum dwelling sizes or minimum amenity installations or continue to view these requirements as arbitrary and serve to drive up the cost of housing while limiting the buyer's freedom of choice. S. Any additional issues or topics developed by the Planning Commission. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Existing Land Use Map Exhibit B. 2030 Planned Land Use Exhibit C. 2040 Planned Land Use Exhibit D. 2030 Planned Development Sites Exhibit E. 2040 Planned Development Sites Exhibit F. Planned Development Sites Table Exhibit G. Full Plan Draft Turner Road w Drake Dr 0 U 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN JKatrina 12 t 7-si _.. _ �wr d�nter C� � o � .aG Moline Road to W CL � r 19N r r � ��dys�de r �Oaa 1 Lake Classen z v to 0 m m a .n s 0 U) Stubbs �µoad a Bay Painter W Branch Road 1 a Road Dutch Lake Legend City Limits Road 151' L e Forest Lake North Arm Y 6t1i o hq� E o r QN, Lake 7 Inset 1 12 U � 1 �• o i Watertown Road Y) 0 0 m T R m 2 a �o Long m "� • Lake it • t, y.l Orchardq t WayyZ4 N� OI n Aver:'�a_ 12 Existing Land UseBOLTN � & E N K April 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. L ._. Z 0 �� ,,°1 I _ Residential (20 i I T m tq - 25 units / acre) zl i 0 U m. 0Kelley Pkwy �1 Office Island Residential Industrial Inset 1 3rd,Ave N U aaaJJJ o 0 - Fox St , eg d VJ Ln � 1 as Laky rv�e netonk, Browns I enc Tanager Bay i Maxwell Lake Bay i" French i Inset 2 Marsh I � Jenning's I /, OI Bay � i • 1•• ♦ y�° Smith Bracketts • Point � " I F Nest ♦• ' Crystal Bohns ••�.• (y Bay Pnint�•♦ 1 Harrison .. — �.♦ • �' Bay 1 4f'• iline Ur Lafayette Bay Inset 2 �% �.• ,♦'� ♦�. Lakes & Ponds /; •• Carman's 1 Bay '� ♦•• �° Wetlands Rivers & Streams ♦ ,♦ . '•` ♦.' F'/ 0 3,500 ♦ ♦ M. W Feet • • Casco : �0 '0 • • Point y ° Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. �•. _ z si,,,oI Hennepin County, MnDOT ro ,orn pve z 0 ..— ....-.. W . Land Use Classes z 23rd Ave N z 0 0 W 0 0 m� c` Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Urban High Density _ Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Commercial / Office Island Residential Industrial Urban Low Park, Density Residential (0.5 Recreational, - 2 units / acre) and Open Space Urban Medium Density Undeveloped Residential (3 - 10 units / acre) _ Right -of -Way Figure 313-2a 0 M G Turner Road c� tr w Drake Dr 3 0 U Vtoad Painter W Branch Road Dutch Lake Legend 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN mllii-. n J sinter C;, G7 Moline Road]o W CL City Limits Katrina Lake . \ #- C31 1 Star .. z o ' sthq� E t' Lake Classen z �a z lob��� T, R � m 0 � T � i m U a "a n O s Lake 19 N } 012. . in Watertown Road_.._}• r U) o °aa N C-0 l m i J m r Stubbs Long " •' • Lake 7 Future Land Use March 2018 r=-�'-' L -Z m 0 o: � � m ad I Spripg��� z I+ Lydiar: M: � ke X01 Kelley m. 01 I LL I #I-- -oia 9�ake,Q Inset 1 3rdA+N o Northern Ave Bay I U Fox St ity Road 151 0 2 t - Browns 0 North y �I. Tanager gay r ��^ Arm Maxwell _ Lake wBay � � French Forest Marsh R Lake Jenninc I O� Bay I•., yc° Smith Bracketts •` Point r Nest ♦•• •' �• c I CrystalBohns �. o ♦ C9 Bay Point •• • . 1 Harrison • • — •.I • • ` • amu„ Bay 1 '� iline Dr `Jd 0s �* _ O g • Lafayette 1 Bay �' 1 Inset 2 �%. _ �. ♦' ♦�. e y Lakes & Ponds / Carman's I• 1 Bay •� A. z 0 0 Wetlands Rivers & Streams ,♦ . •` ♦.• F'/ 0 3,500 •' ♦' Feet Casco ' . • , • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. • . _ Z Hennepin County, MnDOT ' • — • ' — a�t�, ami Lak( netonk, Inset 2 PI BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Dickeys r '1" z 23rd Ave N z 0 0 tr c 3 0 m D Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Urban Medium High Density Residential (10 - 20 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Urban High Island Density Residential (20 Residential - 25 units / acre) ighIan dAv Urban Low Road Density Commercial / Residential (0.5 Office - 2 units / acre) Urban Medium Industrial Density Residential (3 - Park, 10 units /acre) Recreational, and Open Space W R 0 s Figure 313-3a 7, , , h^ /ri 4)dj Dustin Rief From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED Dustin, Soren Mattick <SMattick@ck-law.com> Monday, June 11, 2018 5:15 PM Dustin Rief Fire Contract Orono Ltr re Fire Services Contract 5-11-18 - PDF.PDF; Fwd: Your SA Fleet Account Has Been Suspended - Action Required - Do Not Reply; Re: [External] Re: Long Lake Fire Radio Plans; Long Lake Fire Proposal.docx Please review this email and it meets with your approval, distribute it to the Council. The City of Orono received a letter from Long Lake's attorney demanding payment in the amount of $370, 833.09 which represents Orono's share of the $446,479.52 purchase price (see attached letter). Orono has declined to pay for the truck. At previous Council meetings, the City of Orono has stated that they will not pay for the truck until a new contract between the two parties has been finalized. The City of Long Lake has refused to negotiate with Orono until the truck is paid for. The parties are at an impasse. Long Lake has demanded payment by 6/11/18 or they will start to charge the City of Orono interest on the outstanding balance. There are two obvious paths at this point. 1) Pay for the fire truck and negotiate a contract. 2) Status Quo. Don't pay for the fire truck and wait to see what Long Lake does next. If the Council wishes to pursue option 2, 1 would propose the following letter: Dear Mr. Thames, Please be advised that this law firm represents the City of Orono. I am in receipt of your May 11th letter whereby you demand payment of $370,833.09 for Orono's share of the fire truck. Orono respectfully declines to make that payment at this time. As you are aware, the conditions of payment under the Agreement and Contract for Fire Protection ("Contract") entered into by the parties have not been satisfied. Regarding the purchase of the fire truck, the Contract states in relevant part: The City of Long Lake and the Long Lake Fire Department shall prepare a 15 year major equipment replacement plan, and a 15 year plan for major maintenance, repair, or rehabilitation items related to the fire station. These 15 year plans will be the basis for the preparation of an annual capital budget. Neither the approval nor lack of disapproval of the 15 year plans by the Contract Cities creates any obligation for final approval or funding of any specific capital expenditure. Final approval of capital expenditures occurs as part of the Annual Fire Services Capital Budget approval process. (see paragraph 11) The City of Long Lake has never prepared an Annual Fire Services Capital Budget or presented one for approval to the City of Orono. In December of 2016 the City of Orono approved a City of Orono 15 year CIP (prepared by Orono), but this was not the Annual Fire Services Capital Budget. The staff report specifically states, "approving the CIP does not authorize any expenditure". The Contract is clear, without the required approval, the City of Orono is not required to pay for a capital expenditure. It is my understanding that Long Lake believes it can charge interest for late payments in the amount of 5%. Because the payment isn't due, no interest can accrue. Finally, it has come to Orono's attention that Long Lake continues to authorize capital expenditures without following the terms of the agreement (see attached email) and that there appears to be a certain level of mismanagement regarding the ability to purchase fuel for the fire trucks (see attached email). Based on the above, it is Orono's desire to sit down and discuss the contract. I believe finalizing a new contract will appease Orono's concerns regarding capital expenditures and result in the payment of the fire truck. Please let me know when your client would like to meet. Soren M. Mattick Attorney CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Fagan, ININ 55121 Phone: (651) 234-6217 • Fax: (651) 234-6237 smattick&ck-law.com 0 www.ck-law.com J(}�� CAMPBELL KNUTSON